Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

Healdsburg City Council
April 21, 2025

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
April 21, 2025
Body
Healdsburg City Council
Pages
10
Original file
102.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on healdsburgca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Hall Council Chamber Meeting Date: April 21, 2025
401 Grove Street Time: 6:00 PM
Healdsburg, CA 95448 Date Posted: April 16, 2025
(707) 431-3317
www.healdsburg.gov
To join by computer, tablet, or mobile device:

Go to https://zoom.us/join and type in the Webinar ID: 815 8894 3494 or follow this link:
healdsburg.gov/zoom (Pre-registration for the meeting is not required.) To view the agenda online, visit healdsburg.gov/agendas. To view the Council Meeting PowerPoint presentations or correspondence received after the agenda packet has been posted, visit healdsburg.gov/presentations. To electronically submit correspondence regarding an item on the agenda, please email [email protected]. Documents and correspondence received 72 hours prior to the meeting will be posted by 10:00 a.m. the following business day. .

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Approval of Agenda

2. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION(S)

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
A. A Proclamation Recognizing Utilities Director Terry Crowley

4. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND NON

AGENDA ITEMS
This time is set aside to receive comments from the public regarding matters of general interest not on the agenda, but related to City Council/RSA business. Pursuant to the Brown Act, however, the City Council cannot consider any issues or take action on any requests during this comment period. Public comment on non-agenda items is limited to thirty (30) minutes total for all speakers, with each speaker given no more than three (3) minutes. If there are more than ten (10) audience/public comment speakers, the Mayor may reduce each speaker’s time from three (3) minutes so that all speakers have an equal time to speak. At the Mayor’s discretion, the public comment period may be extended past 30 minutes. Members from the public wishing to speak on a Consent Agenda item should notify the Mayor during Public Comments.

City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Agenda
April 21, 2025

Page 2 ends

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine in nature or have been previously reviewed by the Council and require little or no further discussion by the Council, public, or applicant and action will be taken by the City Council by a single motion. A Councilmember may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and action taken separately. Consent by a majority of the Councilmembers present will be required in order to remove the item. In the event an item is removed, the matter will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

A. Energy Efficiency Forecast and Rebate Programs Update 2025

1. Receive the Energy Efficiency Forecast for 2025-2035 as required by the State for all publicly-owned utilities, 2024 energy efficiency program results, and proposed 2025 updates to the energy rebate programs; and

2. Adopt a Resolution approving ten-year targets for energy efficiency and fuel substitution programs from 2026 to 2035; and

3. Adopt a Resolution approving updates to the Healdsburg Building Energy Rebate Programs.

B. Annual Water Supply and Demand Forecast
Receive a report regarding the status of the City's water supply and forecasted water demands through June 2027.

C. 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project Bid Award Adopt a Resolution conditionally awarding the 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project to AGD General Engineering Inc. in the amount of $88,645, authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract; authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and approve contract change orders up to 20% of the original contract amount D. Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement
Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute and enter into the first amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the City of Healdsburg, Freebird Development Company, LLC, Saggio Hills Lot 14, L.P., and Saggio Hills Lot 3, L.P., for the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project at 450 Parkland Farms Boulevard and amending the Adopted Budget.

E. Approval of Minutes
By motion, approve the August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes and the September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes.

City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Agenda
April 21, 2025

Page 3 ends

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. To Start at a Time Certain of 6:30 p.m. - Public Hearing to Receive community input and consider introduction of an Ordinance Amending Healdsburg Municipal Code Article 1 (General Provisions) within Chapter 2.40 (Elections) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to add section 2.40.010.01 “District Elections” to Provide for the Election of Members of the City Council by Five Districts; Establish the District Boundaries; and Election Order of Each District

1. Conduct a sixth public hearing to receive community input regarding the proposed final map, Draft Map D, and any other published draft maps and sequence of elections for district-based council elections; and

2. Select the final map to be included in proposed ordinance; and

3. Select the two District Seats to be up for election in 2026 (with the remaining District seats to be up for election in 2028) to be included in the proposed ordinance; and

4. Consider introducing by title only and waive further reading of an Ordinance Amending Healdsburg Municipal Code Article 1 (General Provisions) within Chapter

2.40 (Elections) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to add section 2.40.010.01 “District Elections” to Provide for the Election of Members of the City Council by Five Districts; Establish the District Boundaries; and Election Order of Each District.

8. OLD BUSINESS
None.

9. NEW BUSINESS
A. An Ordinance Designating Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Area
Introduce for first reading, by title only, waiving further reading of the text, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Healdsburg designating fire hazard severity zones in the Local Responsibility Area (LRA).

B. 2025 Sewer System Management Plan Audit and Findings Receive the 2025 Sewer System Management Plan Audit that reviews the effectiveness of the 2020 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP).

C. Abel De Luna Community Center Multicultural Center Concept and Grant Funding from Sonoma County
City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Agenda
April 21, 2025

Page 4 ends

Receive a presentation and provide direction to staff regarding (1) the integration of concepts from a multicultural center planning process into the design and operation of the Abel De Luna Community Center, and (2) receipt of $500,000 in grant funding from Sonoma County through Supervisor James Gore’s office.

10. COUNCIL REPORTS ON MATTERS OF INTEREST OCCURRING SINCE

PREVIOUS REGULAR MEETING/EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT REPORTS

11. ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL / RSA MEETING

12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
A. Future Agenda Items for 2025
SB 343 - DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency Board regarding any item on this agenda after the posting of this agenda and not otherwise exempt from disclosure, will be made available for public review in the City Clerk's Office located at City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, during normal business hours. If supplemental materials are made available to the members of the City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency Board at the meeting, a copy will be available for public review at the City Hall Council Chambers, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448.

These writings will be made available in appropriate alternative formats upon request by a person with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DISABLED ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Healdsburg will make reasonable accommodations for persons having special needs due to disabilities. Please contact Raina Allan, City Clerk, at Healdsburg City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, California, 431-3317, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, to ensure the necessary accommodations are made.

CIUDAD DE HEALDSBURG

CONSEJO DE LA CIUDAD/AGENCIA SUCESORA A LA DE
REURBANIZACIÓN
ORDEN DEL DÍA DE LA REUNIÓN ORDINARIA
Sala del Consejo del Ayuntamiento Fecha de la reunión: 21 de abril de 2025 401 Grove Street Hora: 6:00 PM
Healdsburg, CA 95448 Fecha de publicación: 16 de abril de 2025 (707) 431-3317
www.healdsburg.gov
Para unirse por computadora, tableta o dispositivo móvil:

Conéctese a https://zoom.us/join y escriba la clave del seminario web: 815 8894 3494 o siga este enlace: healdsburg.gov/zoom (No es necesario el registro previo para asistir a la reunión.) Para consultar el orden del día en línea, conéctese a healdsburg.gov/agendas. Para ver las presentaciones en PowerPoint de la reunión del Consejo o la correspondencia recibida después de que se haya publicado el paquete del orden del día, conéctese a healdsburg.gov/presentations.

Para enviar electrónicamente correspondencia sobre un tema del orden del día, envíe un correo electrónico a [email protected]. Los documentos y la correspondencia que se reciban 72 horas antes de la reunión se publicarán antes de las 10:00 a.m. del siguiente día laborable. .

1. INICIO DE LA REUNIÓN/TOMA DE ASISTENCIA
A. Juramento de lealtad
B. Aprobación del orden del día

2. INFORME SOBRE SESIÓN(ES) A PUERTA CERRADA

3. ANUNCIOS/PRESENTACIONES
A. Proclamación de reconocimiento al Director de Servicios Públicos Terry Crowley

4. INFORMES DEL ADMINISTRADOR DE LA CIUDAD

5. COMENTARIOS DEL PÚBLICO SOBRE ASUNTOS DEL ORDEN DEL DÍA ACORDADO Y PUNTOS NO INCLUIDOS EN EL ORDEN DEL DÍA
Este tiempo se reserva para recibir comentarios del público sobre asuntos de interés general que no figuran en el orden del día, pero que están relacionados con los asuntos del Consejo de la Ciudad/RSA. Sin embargo, de conformidad con la Ley Brown, el Consejo de la Ciudad no debe considerar ningún asunto ni tomar medidas sobre ninguna solicitud durante este período de comentarios. El tiempo total para los comentarios del público sobre asuntos no incluidos en el orden del día está limitado a treinta (30) minutos para todos los oradores, y cada orador dispondrá de un máximo de tres (3) minutos. Si hay más de diez (10) oradores de comentarios del público, el Orden del día de la reunión ordinaria del Consejo de la Ciudad/RSA 21 de abril de 2025
Página 6
alcalde podrá reducir el tiempo de cada orador de tres (3) minutos para que todos los oradores tengan el mismo tiempo para hablar. A discreción del alcalde, el período para comentarios del público puede extenderse más allá de los 30 minutos. Los miembros del público que deseen hablar sobre un tema del orden del día acordado deben notificarlo al alcalde durante los comentarios del público.

6. ORDEN DEL DÍA ACORDADO
Los siguientes puntos del orden del día acordado se consideran de rutina o han sido revisados previamente por el Consejo y requieren poca o ninguna discusión adicional por parte del Consejo, el público o el solicitante, y el Consejo de la Ciudad tomará medidas mediante una sola moción.

Un miembro del Consejo puede solicitar que se elimine un punto del orden del día acordado y que se tomen medidas por separado. La eliminación de un punto requerirá el consentimiento de la mayoría de los miembros del Consejo presentes En caso de que se elimine un punto, el asunto se considerará inmediatamente después de la adopción del orden del día acordado.

A. Pronóstico de eficiencia energética y actualización de programas de reembolsos 2025

1. Recibir el pronóstico de eficiencia energética para 2025-2035 según lo exige el Estado para todas las empresas de servicios públicos, los resultados del programa de eficiencia energética de 2024 y las actualizaciones propuestas para 2025 de los programas de reembolsos de los costos de energía; y

2. Adoptar una Resolución por la que se aprueben los objetivos decenales para los programas de eficiencia energética y sustitución de combustibles de 2026 a 2035; y

3. Adoptar una Resolución por la que se aprueben las actualizaciones de los programas de descuentos energéticos para edificios de Healdsburg.

B. Pronóstico anual de la oferta y la demanda de agua.

Recibir un informe sobre el estado del suministro de agua de la Ciudad y los pronósticos de demanda de agua hasta finales de junio de 2027.

C. Adjudicación de la licitación del proyecto de reparación de aceras y cierre de brechas 24/25
Adoptar una resolución que adjudique de forma condicional el proyecto de reparación de aceras y cierre de brechas 24/25 a la empresa AGD General Engineering Inc. por la cantidad de $88,645, autorizando al Administrador de la Ciudad a celebrar el contrato; y que autorice al Administrador de la Ciudad a negociar y aprobar órdenes de modificación del contrato por hasta el 20% de la cantidad original del contrato D. Vivienda económicamente accesible de Saggio Hills, primera modificación del Acuerdo de Disposición y Desarrollo
Orden del día de la reunión ordinaria del Consejo de la Ciudad/RSA 21 de abril de 2025
Página 7
Adoptar una resolución que apruebe y autorice al Administrador de la Ciudad a celebrar y firmar la primera modificación del Acuerdo de Disposición y Desarrollo entre la Ciudad de Healdsburg, Freebird Development Company, LLC, Saggio Hills Lot 14, L.P., y Saggio Hills Lot 3, L.P., para el proyecto de vivienda económicamente accesible de Saggio Hills en 450 Parkland Farms Boulevard y que modifique el presupuesto adoptado.

E. Aprobación de las minutas
Por moción, aprobar las minutas de la reunión ordinaria del 19 de agosto de 2024 y, las minutas de la reunión ordinaria del 3 de septiembre de 2024.

7. AUDIENCIAS PÚBLICAS
A. Comenzará a la hora determinada de 6:30 p.m. - una Audiencia pública para recibir los comentarios de la comunidad y considerar la introducción de una ordenanza que modifique el Artículo 1 del Código Municipal de Healdsburg (Disposiciones generales) dentro del Capítulo 2.40 (Elecciones) del Título 2 (Administración y personal) para agregar la sección 2.40.010.01 “Elecciones de distrito” para disponer la elección de miembros del Consejo Municipal por cinco distritos; Establecer los límites de los distritos; y Orden de elección de cada distrito.

1. Realizar la sexta audiencia pública para recibir las opiniones de la comunidad con respecto al mapa final propuesto, el mapa preliminar D, y cualquier otro mapa preliminar publicado, y la secuencia de elecciones para las elecciones del consejo basadas en distritos; y

2. Seleccionar el mapa final que se incluirá en la ordenanza propuesta; y

3. Seleccionar los dos escaños de distrito que se elegirán en 2026 (los escaños de distrito restantes se elegirán en 2028) que se incluirán en la ordenanza propuesta; y

4. Considerar la introducción solo por título de una ordenanza que modifique el artículo 1 del Código Municipal de Healdsburg y renunciar a la lectura adicional de la misma (Disposiciones generales) dentro del capítulo 2.40 (Elecciones) del Título 2 (Administración y personal) para agregar la sección 2.40.010.01 “Elecciones de distrito” para disponer la elección de miembros del Consejo Municipal por cinco distritos; Establecer los límites de los distritos; y el orden de elección de cada distrito.

8. ASUNTOS PENDIENTES
Ninguno
Orden del día de la reunión ordinaria del Consejo de la Ciudad/RSA 21 de abril de 2025
Página 8

9. NUEVOS ASUNTOS
A. Una ordenanza que designa las zonas de gravedad de riesgo de incendio en el Área de Responsabilidad Local
Presentar para la primera lectura, solo por título y renunciando a la lectura adicional del texto, una Ordenanza del Consejo de la Ciudad de Healdsburg que designa zonas de gravedad de riesgo de incendio en el Área de Responsabilidad Local (LRA).

B. Auditoría y conclusiones del Plan de Administración del Sistema de Drenaje Sanitario de 2025
Recibir la auditoría del Plan de Administración del Sistema de Drenaje Sanitario de 2025 que revisa la eficacia del Plan de Administración del Sistema de Drenaje Sanitario (SSMP) de 2020.

C. Centro Comunitario Abel De Luna. Concepto de Centro Multicultural y fondos de subvención del Condado de Sonoma
Recibir una presentación y dar indicaciones al personal sobre (1) la integración de conceptos de un proceso de planificación de un centro multicultural en el diseño y la operación del Centro Comunitario Abel De Luna., y (2) el recibo de $500,000 en subvenciones del Condado de Sonoma a través de la oficina del Supervisor James Gore.

10. INFORMES DEL CONSEJO SOBRE ASUNTOS DE INTERÉS OCURRIDOS DESDE LA ÚLTIMA REUNIÓN ORDINARIA/INFORMES DE REEMBOLSO DE GASTOS

11. SE CIERRA LA REUNIÓN DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL/RSA

12. FUTUROS ASUNTOS DEL ORDEN DEL DÍA
A. Puntos futuros del orden del día para 2025
SB 343 - DOCUMENTOS RELACIONADOS CON LOS ÓRDENES DEL DÍA DE SESIONES ABIERTAS: Cualquier escrito o documento que se entregue a la mayoría del Consejo de la Ciudad/Consejo de la Agencia Sucesora a la de Reurbanización en relación con cualquier punto de este orden del día después de la publicación de este orden del día y que no esté exento de divulgación, estará disponible para su revisión por parte del público en la Oficina del Secretario de la Ciudad, ubicada en City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, durante el horario laboral normal. Si en la reunión se ponen materiales complementarios a disposición de los miembros del Consejo de la Ciudad/Consejo de la Agencia Sucesora a la de Orden del día de la reunión ordinaria del Consejo de la Ciudad/RSA 21 de abril de 2025
Página 9
Reurbanización, habrá una copia de dichos materiales disponible para su revisión por parte del público en City Hall Council Chambers, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448.

Estos escritos estarán disponibles en formatos alternativos apropiados a petición de una persona con discapacidad, tal y como exige la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades.

ADAPTACIONES PARA PERSONAS INCAPACITADAS: La Ciudad de Healdsburg hará adaptaciones razonables para las personas con necesidades especiales debido a incapacidades.

Por favor, comuníquese con Raina Allan, Secretario de la Ciudad, en Healdsburg City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, California, 431-3317, al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión, para asegurarse de que se hagan las adaptaciones necesarias.

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

PROCLAMATION

A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG HONORING UTILITY DIRECTOR TERRY

CROWLEY FOR FOURTEEN YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO

THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG
WHEREAS, Terry Crowley has served the City of Healdsburg exemplifying leadership, professionalism, technical expertise, and management acumen in his role as Utility Director; and WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg recognizes the outstanding contributions made by Utility Director Crowley to reliably deliver essential electric, water and wastewater treatment services to the Healdsburg Community; and
WHEREAS, Terry Crowley has played an instrumental role in several key initiatives, including the installation of the City’s floating solar array at the Water Reclamation Facility, which was the largest in the country for a time, to provide locally-produced renewable electricity to Healdsburg; and WHEREAS, Terry Crowley led the implementation of the City’s recycled water program that not only provides a means of compliance for the summer seasonal discharge prohibition, but also helps the City reduce demands on potable water resources; and
WHEREAS, Terry Crowley strategically positioned the City’s water rights to maintain water supplies as plentiful as possible in light of the uncertainties of climate change and upstream diversions; and WHEREAS, Terry Crowley served as an outstanding advocate for the City and its residents with electricity purveyors and regulatory agencies of all sorts, ensuring that Healdsburg met its compliance obligations for electricity, water, and wastewater, for which the regulations and requirements are continuously changing and increasingly rigorous; and
WHEREAS, Terry Crowley has overseen the water, wastewater, and electric utilities through fires, floods, City-wide evacuations, and pandemics while maintaining the highest level of service available with each situation; and
WHEREAS, Terry Crowley served as one of Healdsburg’s key representatives to the Northern California Power Agency, where he is respected as an expert in the field of publicly owned utilities; and WHEREAS, Terry Crowley approached every issue and challenge with sincere interest, reasonableness, fairness, and desire to come to the best solution possible for the community; and WHEREAS, Terry Crowley worked tirelessly and provided continuous support and leadership to his team, every day recognizing their contributions; and WHEREAS, Terry Crowley led the charge on turkey preparation for the staff holiday luncheons for many years, and introduced the term “spatchcocking” to the formerly uninitiated; and WHEREAS, Terry Crowley offered a wry and quick wit in most situations, embracing a ‘work with’ approach over an ‘imposed upon’ approach, much to the appreciation of all who encountered him; and

3.A.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Proclamation (4830 : Proclamation recognizing Terry Crowley) WHEREAS, as Terry Crowley begins his next chapter with the City of Palo Alto, we know that through his hard work and dedication, he laid the groundwork for the City of Healdsburg utilities to continue successfully.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby honors and expresses its deepest gratitude to Terry Crowley for his dedicated service to the City of Healdsburg. We extend our heartfelt thanks for his commitment to the Healdsburg community and wish him continued success in all future endeavors.

Dated: April 21, 2025
SO ORDERED:
_______________________________
Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor

3.A.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Proclamation (4830 : Proclamation recognizing Terry Crowley)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: Energy Efficiency Forecast and Rebate Programs Update 2025 PREPARED BY: Terra Sampson, Utility Conservation Analyst STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Pursue Initiatives that Promote Environmental Stewardship Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Receive the Energy Efficiency Forecast for 2025-2035 as required by the State for all publicly-owned utilities, 2024 energy efficiency program results, and proposed 2025 updates to the energy rebate programs; and

2. Adopt a Resolution approving ten-year targets for energy efficiency and fuel substitution programs from 2026 to 2035; and

3. Adopt a Resolution approving updates to the Healdsburg Building Energy Rebate Programs.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

In October 2023, City Council adopted the Healdsburg Climate Mobilization Strategy (CMS), which included extensive community engagement and outreach activities. The CMS Implementation Plan includes multiple actions related to energy efficiency and efficient electrification.

Energy efficiency and efficient electrification information at large is shared through multiple channels such as the City’s website, social media channels, City Manager newsletter, and utility bill inserts.

BACKGROUND:

California Senate Bill 1037 (Kehoe), signed into law in September 2005, established several important policies on energy efficiency. Among the many provisions of the law is a state-wide commitment to cost‐effective and feasible energy efficiency, with the expectation that all utilities consider energy efficiency before investing in other resources to meet growing demand.

6.A
Packet Pg. 12
Assembly Bill 2021 (Levine), introduced in 2006, added to these policies by requiring the establishment of 10‐year energy efficiency targets. This is a statutory requirement in Public Utilities Code 9505(b) on a quadrennial basis (i.e., updated 10-year energy efficiency forecasts to be developed every 4 years).

The City Council adopted the City’s most recent 10-year electric energy efficiency goals in 2021. Figure 1 below provides a summary of the annual electric energy efficiency goals and achievements since 2018. Detailed results for Healdsburg’s energy programs in 2024 are provided in Attachment 4 and Attachment 5 to this staff report.

Figure 1. Historical Energy Efficiency Program Results
Chart showing the Energy Efficiency Program results compared to the targets from 2018-2024.

EE stands for Energy Efficiency and FS stands for Fuel Substitution (also referred to as Efficient Electrification).

As depicted in the chart, in some years the City exceeded the annual goals, mostly due to large commercial lighting projects, whereas in recent years the targets have not been achieved. This is in part due to initial impacts of COVID and lowered participation rates, but has persisted due to limiting opportunities for claimable cost-effective energy efficiency program savings. For example, as State regulations and building codes require higher efficiency, then there is less efficiency that can be attributed to and claimed by energy rebate programs.

The past two years, the City has also developed new programs for Fuel Substitution (FS), switching from natural gas to efficient electric appliances, which presents a substantial opportunity for claimable energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) savings and is discussed in more detail below.

6.A
Packet Pg. 13
To achieve energy efficiency savings, the City has offered a variety of energy efficiency programs. These programs have been focused on community needs for energy efficiency and primarily focused on broad areas of commercial lighting, appliances, weatherization, and heat pumps. Funding for these programs is largely supported by the City’s Cap & Trade proceeds, which must be used to benefit electric ratepayers while reducing GHG emissions. Programs can also be supported by the Electric Public Benefit’s Charge, which is currently used to fund the CARE income-qualified electric bill discount.

Critical to the success of energy efficiency programs is customer participation. Without the customer’s awareness and willingness to adopt energy efficiency measures and participate in the rebate programs, energy efficiency goals cannot be met. Therefore, well designed programs are necessary to incentivize purchases, upgrades and behaviors that result in a measurable reduction in energy use.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

Energy efficiency and efficient electrification provide several important benefits to Healdsburg Electric and its ratepayers. Energy efficiency measures and projects reduce GHG emissions associated with electricity generation (i.e., natural gas combustion), save ratepayers on electricity costs, reduce stress on California’s grid during peak demands, and make room for additional loads such as electric vehicle charging. Therefore, Healdsburg Electric is committed to energy efficiency and efficient electrification as a climate change mitigation strategy.

To analyze Healdsburg Electric’s energy efficiency potential, the City along with all publiclyowned utilities in California, contracted with GDS Associates to create a standardized model to quantify each utility’s unique efficiency forecast and goals1. A memo from GDS summarizing the results of the study for Healdsburg is included with this staff report as Attachment 3. The model quantified inputs such as projected electricity sales and energy consumption, customer type, current and expected program offerings, saturation rates, market and regulatory factors, and willingness to participate in rebate programs.

The model estimates the technical, economic, and market potential for energy measures for residential and non-residential customers, defined as follows and depicted in Figure 2:
• Technical potential is the energy savings that would result from installation of the most energy efficient measures that are commercially available, regardless of costeffectiveness or rebate program offerings. • Economic potential includes only savings from the installation of cost-effective energy measures.
• Market potential is a subset of the economic potential which is scaled by customers’ awareness and willingness to adopt energy efficient equipment. It also includes calibration of the model based on actual energy efficiency savings and costs for a specific 1 Note: This forecast is different from the Electric Demand Forecast that Healdsburg Electric is working on simultaneously. The forecast discussed in this staff report is part of a State requirement to forecast energy rebate program potentials and goals. The Electric Demand Forecast is intended to forecast future overall electric consumption and demands, in order for Healdsburg Electric to plan for future electricity generation and infrastructure needs.

6.A
Packet Pg. 14
utility, and the rebate program offerings. The market potential results are therefore used as the annual energy efficiency goals.

Figure 2. Type of Energy Efficiency Potential2
Diagram depicting the difference between Technical, Economic, and Market Potential.

New to the forecast this year, the model also estimates energy savings from Fuel Substitution, which is broken into two categories. From 2026-2029, the model estimates overall energy savings from rebate programs for switching from natural gas to efficient electric appliances.

With the understanding that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is currently working on a state-wide proposal to require that HVAC and water heating appliance replacements use zeroemission appliances3 , the model for 2030-2035 estimates energy savings only for selecting high efficiency heat pumps compared to standard electric options and does not include the energy savings for switching from natural gas to efficient electric appliances. Cooking fuel substitution estimates the overall energy savings for switching from natural gas to efficient electric options for the full time period 2026-2035. As a forecast update is required every 4 years, this can be revisited once more is known about the potential CARB regulation.

The recommended goals in Figure 3 are market potential savings based on “net” savings rather than “gross” savings. This means they do not include the energy savings that would have occurred in the absence of utility incentives, and therefore more accurately reflect the energy efficiency savings attributable to Healdsburg’s programs. Healdsburg also excludes savings attributable to building and appliance codes and standards, as these are considered requirements.

Figure 3. Net Incremental Annual Market Potential by Sector and Savings Category 2 Source: GDS. Reproduced from “Guide to Resource Planning with Energy Efficiency.” November 2007. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Figure 2-1. Modified to depict the additional levels of achievable and program potential included in this study.
3 https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/zero-emission-space-and-water-heater-standards

6.A
Packet Pg. 15
Chart showing the Energy Program forecast from 2026-2035. EE stands for Energy Efficiency, FS stands for Fuel Substitution, and FSEE stands for Fuel Substitution Electrification Efficiency.

Non-residential savings continue to represent the bulk of the City’s potential energy efficiency, primarily because non-residential customers have energy-intensive buildings and processes, where just a few commercial projects can result in substantial savings. Non-residential accounts are 18% of total electric accounts, but account for about 64% of city-wide electricity usage.

Energy savings from refrigeration, heating and cooling, lighting, and motors can be substantial in non-residential buildings because the equipment is used frequently throughout the year.

However, program savings related to commercial lighting will be limited in the future due to a new California health and safety regulation regarding mercury-containing light fixtures4, which essentially makes LEDs the default option for light fixture replacements.

In the coming years leading up to an expected CARB regulation for zero-emission space and water heating appliances, residential fuel substitution also contributes a substantial amount of potential energy savings. This is because the City can claim the overall ‘equivalent energy savings’, which also includes the energy savings for switching from natural gas. While the targets for residential fuel substitution appear high, they have had high participation since the rebate offerings were introduced in 2023 and are gaining in customer interest.

In addition to the annual net goals, the energy saved year over year is accounted for as a cumulative net savings as shown in Figure 4. This includes each measure’s usable life and assumes every annual target is met. Although the expected annual savings in 2035 is only 198 MWh, each prior year’s achieved targets become cumulative savings over time achieving up to 4 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2208

6.A
Packet Pg. 16
2,151 MWh cumulative savings in 2035 from energy programs during the 10-year period.

Figure 4. Cumulative Net Market Potential by Sector and Savings Category Chart showing the Energy Program forecast from 2026-2035. EE stands for Energy Efficiency, FS stands for Fuel Substitution, and FSEE stands for Fuel Substitution Electrification Efficiency.

Table 1 shows the annual net energy program targets per sector. Staff recommend adopting these targets as broken out between the savings categories for Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution.

Table 1. 10-Year Incremental Net Energy Program Goals
All Sectors &
Savings Categories
(MWh)
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Total Market
Potential
203 257 317 392 140 150 161 171 183 198
Total Market
Potential EE
101 107 110 113 112 117 122 126 133 144
Total Market
Potential FS&FSEE
102 150 207 278 28 33 39 44 49 54
Commercial Market
Potential EE
89 93 94 94 89 89 88 86 86 87
Commercial Market
Potential FS
16 20 25 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Market
Potential FSEE
0 0 0 0 8 10 11 13 15 16
Residential Market 12 14 16 20 23 28 34 40 47 57

6.A
Packet Pg. 17
Potential EE
Residential Market
Potential FS
85 130 182 248 1 1 1 1 1 1
Residential Market
Potential FSEE
0 0 0 0 18 22 26 29 33 37
Energy program goals are often also expressed as a percentage of electricity sales. Staff recommend adopting the goals as MWh instead of as a percentage of sales. Electric load growth due to transportation electrification was excluded from this study, so that the study would only analyze building electric consumption which the programs might be able to influence. However, in reality, future years will see much higher load growth and it would not be feasible to achieve the percentage targets identified in this study.

Strategies for Achieving the Proposed Goals
Achieving these goals will require effective programs structures and increasing awareness and participation of existing programs, particularly for commercial building owners. The programs currently offered are on a voluntary basis making outreach, education on the value of energy efficiency and efficient electrification, and well-designed programs necessary to gain participation.

It is also important to periodically review program eligibility criteria, rebate amounts, new program offerings, and programs that no longer have claimable savings. The newest POU Technical Reference Manual (TRM) was recently completed and establishes the claimable savings for various programs. Staff recently reviewed the existing programs based on the new POU TRM and propose some program updates, which are outlined in Attachment 6. The more substantial updates are also described below in italics.

The Electric Department offers several energy efficiency and efficient electrification programs to incentivize all customer segments. Below is a high-level overview of the programs5.

Residential Programs
Heating & Cooling Rebates for the installation of a heat pump HVAC system
Incentives for enrolling a smart thermostat in
the Load Management program
Weatherization Rebates for attic and wall insulation
Remove rebates for windows because no
longer included in the POU TRM as claimable
savings and low participation
Appliances Rebates for clothes washers, heat pump clothes dryers, heat pump water heaters, and electric
cooktops
Add rebates for heat pump pool heater fuel
5 Note: Only building energy programs are included in this staff report. The City also has a number of electric transportation, load management, and water programs. Information about all Healdsburg programs is available at www.SmartLivingHealdsburg.org.

6.A
Packet Pg. 18
substitution due to high savings opportunity
Remove rebates for pool pump because no
longer included in the POU TRM as claimable
savings and low participation
CARE / Income-Qualified Programs
All of the residential programs above, plus:

Multi-Family Appliance Replacement Program Rebates up to 100% for certain appliances at large income-qualified multi-family properties
Phase 1 of the program currently focused on
refrigerators and dishwashers, targeting phase
1 completion in 2025
Future phases to be determined at a later date
Heating & Cooling Rebates up to 100% for smart thermostats that are enrolled in the Load Management program
Remove the $50,000 maximum rebate cap for existing income-restricted multi-family properties working on fuel substitution projects for their whole property, with utility pre-approval for project and confirmation of available budget
Commercial Programs
Heating & Cooling Rebates for the installation of a heat pump HVAC system
Appliances Rebates for heat pump water heaters and
commercial kitchen equipment
Commercial Lighting Rebates for LED lighting upgrades or controls/sensors that incentivize peak demand
reduction
Modifications to reduce rebate eligibility and
estimated savings, as well as change focus to
controls/sensors and reducing lighting
fixtures/over-lighting, due to new CA health
and safety code
Custom Program Site-specific energy efficiency improvements such as refrigeration or motor replacement
Include measures that have gas savings only,
such as hot water savings that will reduce the
demand on future electric hot water heater
Remove electrification bonus and set different rebate amounts between energy efficiency and fuel substitution, similar to the residential rebate structure.

Following this Council item, Staff will begin working on the rebate updates, including rebate forms, webpage information, and informing contractor lists of the changes. Updates will be rolled out as ready and completed by no later than December 31, 2025. Staff will also monitor rebate programs and make administrative updates, such as eligibility clarifications or efficiency requirements based on the new POU TRM, as necessary to ensure program success and effectiveness.

6.A
Packet Pg. 19
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Energy efficiency and efficient electrification programs contribute to GHG emission reductions, help sustain grid reliability, and help minimize grid impacts from new load such as electric vehicle charging. The Climate Mobilization Strategy includes targets for decarbonizing residential buildings by 8% and commercial buildings by 5% by 2030. If achieved, these strategies would reduce GHG emissions by 812 MTCO2e and 314 MTCO2e respectively.

ALTERNATIVES:

As an alternative the City Council could direct staff to increase or decrease energy efficiency goals by a percentage. Staff does not recommend this alternative at this time. The study performed by GDS to develop these targets was implemented using the same methodology for all publicly-owned utilities (POUs) in California, vetted by staff, and represents the best forecast of energy efficiency program potential that is available. The POU report has a statutory requirement to be submitted to the California Energy Commission by no later than May 14.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The adopted budget for the Cap-and-Trade Allowances and Public Benefit Fund includes the cost of these programs and contains sufficient funding to support staff’s recommendation for the current biennial budget for FY2024-25 and FY2025-26. From time-to-time, Staff will come before Council to recommend new programs or changes in incentive levels for existing programs and propose any budget adjustments at that time. Staff will also consider these program goals in the Cap-and-Trade and Public Benefit Fund budget proposals during the next biennial budget process, which sufficient funds are available in these Funds to support the energy efficiency and fuel substitution targets. Customer participation is necessary to achieve these goals, making it important to maintain flexibility in program design, type, and incentive levels, while being costeffective.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

The adoption of the Energy Efficiency Forecast and Goals is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the Energy Efficiency Forecast and Goals is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution - Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Forecast Resolution - Rebate Programs
Healdsburg Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Potential Forecast Memo 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt
2024 Healdsburg Energy Programs Summary
Rebate Change Summary

6.A
Packet Pg. 20

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. -2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG APPROVING TEN-YEAR TARGETS FOR

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND FUEL SUBSTITUTION
PROGRAMS FROM 2026 TO 2035
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1037 requires electricity providers to commit to cost-effective and feasible energy efficiency; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2021 requires the establishment of ten-year energy efficiency targets; and
WHEREAS, Public Utilities Code 9505(b) requires energy efficiency targets be updated on a quadrennial basis and submitted to the California Energy Commission; and WHEREAS, in 1996, the State of California established the Public Benefits Fund to support energy efficiency programs, renewable energy generation, and low-income discounts; and WHEREAS, California’s Cap-and-Trade Program provides freely allocated allowances to Healdsburg Electric Utility, with the requirement that the value of allowances must be used to benefit electric ratepayers while reducing greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, in 2016, SB 32 set a target for achieving a 40 percent reduction in GHG emissions below 1990 levels by 2030, and in 2018, EO B-55-18 established a goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 and was codified by AB 1279; and WHEREAS, electric energy efficiency and fuel substitution programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions and overall energy consumption; and
WHEREAS, residential and commercial energy efficiency and fuel substitution programs should incentivize high energy efficiency options, be cost-effective, and support equity; and WHEREAS, the potential for energy efficiency and fuel substitution in Healdsburg was studied by GDS Associates, Inc through a state-wide effort led by California’s Publicly Owned Electric Utilities; and
WHEREAS, due to increases in mandatory energy efficiency from various State building codes and Federal appliance and equipment standards (codes and standards) the overall potential for energy efficiency decreases over time; and
WHEREAS, fuel substitution and electrification efficiency present new opportunities for energy programs and savings; and

6.A.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Resolution - Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Forecast (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Resolution No. xx-2025

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Healdsburg adopted a Climate Mobilization Strategy in October 2023, which includes residential and commercial building decarbonization; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of the Energy Efficiency Forecast and Goals is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the Energy Efficiency Forecast and Goals is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby;

1. Find that the adoption of the Energy Efficiency Forecast and Goals is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the Energy Efficiency Forecast and Goals is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

2. Establish program targets for energy efficiency and fuel substitution Megawatt-hours (MWh) savings as outlined in the Memo attachment to this resolution.

3. Direct staff to work with the Northern California Power Agency and California Municipal Utilities Association to submit the adopted targets to the California Energy Commission by the statutory deadline.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
__________________________________ ____________________________________ Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.A.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Resolution - Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Forecast (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. -2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG APPROVING UPDATES TO THE

HEALDBURG BUILDING ENERGY REBATE PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, in 1996, the State of California established the Public Benefits Fund to support energy efficiency programs, renewable energy generation, and low-income discounts; and WHEREAS, California’s Cap-and-Trade Program provides freely allocated allowances to Healdsburg Electric Utility, with the requirement that the value of allowances must be used to benefit electric ratepayers while reducing greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, in 2016, SB 32 set a target for achieving a 40 percent reduction in GHG emissions below 1990 levels by 2030, and in 2018, EO B-55-18 established a goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 and was codified by AB 1279; and WHEREAS, electric energy efficiency and fuel substitution programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions and overall energy consumption; and
WHEREAS, Healdsburg Electric Utility has long-term goals to provide cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation programs to its commercial and residential customers; and WHEREAS, residential and commercial energy efficiency and fuel substitution programs should incentivize high energy efficiency options, be cost-effective, and support equity; and WHEREAS, an updated Technical Reference Manual for California publicly-owned utilities (POU TRM), which outlines energy measures and savings, was completed in early 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Healdsburg adopted a Climate Mobilization Strategy (CMS) in October 2023, which includes residential and commercial building decarbonization; and
WHEREAS, action BE-3.6 in the CMS directs staff to continue to conduct periodic energy efficiency rebates reviews; and
WHEREAS, staff identified building energy rebate program updates based on the recently completed POU TRM, 2024 rebate program results, and the energy efficiency and fuel substitution forecast; and
WHEREAS, Healdsburg also offers water conservation rebates, electric transportation programs, and energy load management incentives, which are outside the scope of this resolution for building energy rebates; and

6.A.b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Resolution - Rebate Programs (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Resolution No. xx-2025

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the adoption of Building Energy Rebate Program Updates is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the Energy Rebate Program is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby:

1. Find that the adoption of Building Energy Rebate Program Updates is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the Energy Rebate Program is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

2. Authorize updates to the Building Energy Rebate Programs as outlined in the summary attached to this resolution.

3. Delegate authority to staff to make administrative updates to the rebate programs as necessary to ensure program success and effectiveness.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
___________________________________ ____________________________________ Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.A.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Resolution - Rebate Programs (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs)

MEMORANDUM
2025 CMUA Energy Efficiency Potential Forecasting Study C O N F I D E N T I A L 1

MEMORANDUM
TO City of Healdsburg
FROM GDS Associates, Inc.

DATE March 13, 2025
RE 2025 CMUA Energy Efficiency Potential Forecasting Study

INTRODUCTION
This memo provides the City of Healdsburg (Healdsburg) results of the California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA) Energy Efficiency (EE) Potential Forecasting Study conducted in 2025 by GDS Associates, Inc. (GDS). The results described here are specific to the Healdsburg service territory and account for unique characteristics of the service area, customer base, climate zone, economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This memo provides a summary of the EE Savings Forecast and Fuel Substitution/Electrification Efficiency program opportunity, as well as a description of the data provided in the detailed results spreadsheet file provided to the utility. Energy efficiency potential is followed by fuel substitution and electrification efficiency opportunities.

SUMMARY OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL
This potential study provides a roadmap for Healdsburg as they develop strategies and programs for energy efficiency.

The development of market potential estimates for a range of feasible measures is useful for program planning and modification purposes.

The Healdsburg energy efficiency program target for the next 10 years (sum of incremental annual, 2026 through 2035) is set at 1,186 MWh. This results in an average annual target of 0.15 percent of total projected energy sales. Figure 1 provides the market potential for the residential and non-residential sectors, as well as the total incremental potential as a percentage of total sales for the 10-year period of 2026 to 2035.

FIGURE 1. NET INCREMENTAL MARKET POTENTIAL BY SECTOR (MWH) AND PERCENT OF SALES

0.00%

0.02%

0.04%

0.06%

0.08%

0.10%

0.12%

0.14%

0.16%

0.18%

0.20%
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
% of Annual Sales
MWh
Residential NonResidential Total Incremental Potential as a % of Sales

6.A.c
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Healdsburg Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Potential Forecast Memo (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Table 1 below includes the specific inputs used to create Figure 1. The annual energy and demand impacts are provided.

The energy impacts are shown as a percentage of forecasted sector-level and total sales. Incremental annual savings range from 101 MWh to 144 MWh, which corresponds to 0.13% to 0.18% of the forecasted sales.

TABLE 1 NET INCREMENTAL MARKET POTENTIAL BY SECTOR – ENERGY AND DEMAND 10 Year Energy Goals (Incremental Net MWh)
ALL Sectors (MWh) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Total Market Potential 101 107 110 113 112 117 122 126 133 144 Res Market Potential 12 14 16 20 23 28 34 40 47 57
Non-Res Market Potential 89 93 94 94 89 89 88 86 86 87
Total Potential as a % of
Total Sales

0.13% 0.14% 0.14% 0.15% 0.14% 0.15% 0.15% 0.16% 0.17% 0.18% Res Potential as a % of
Res Sales

0.04% 0.05% 0.06% 0.07% 0.08% 0.10% 0.12% 0.14% 0.16% 0.19% Non-Res Potential as a %
of Non-Res Sales

0.18% 0.19% 0.19% 0.19% 0.18% 0.18% 0.18% 0.17% 0.17% 0.17% 10 Year Demand Goals (Incremental kW)
ALL Sectors (kW) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Total Market Potential 27 27 26 26 26 26 27 27 28 28
Res Market Potential 6 5 4 5 6 7 9 10 12 13
Non-Res Market Potential 22 22 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15
At a glance, Healdsburg’s results include:
 A 2026-2035 average annual gross savings target of 0.17% of forecasted retail sales  A 2026-2035 average annual net savings target of 0.15% of forecasted retail sales  No claim of savings from codes and standards (C&S)
Detailed Results
GDS has provided Healdsburg with a detailed results file which includes the summary information described above, as well as additional detailed results. The results file includes the following information:
 10-yr gross incremental and cumulative annual energy and demand savings  10-yr net incremental and cumulative annual energy and demand savings  20-yr cumulative annual technical, economic and market potential by sector – energy and demand  20-yr incremental annual market potential by sector – energy and demand  20-yr market potential by program
 20-yr market potential by end-use
 20-yr costs by program
 Comprehensive measure mapping list

SUMMARY OF FUEL SUBSTITUTION AND ELECTRIFICATION EFFICIENCY The analysis of fuel substitution and electrification efficiency opportunities provides a roadmap for the City of Healdsburg as they develop strategies and programs to support fuel substitution and electrification efficiency. The development of program opportunity estimates account for converting fossil fuel heating (space heating and water heating), and cooking for a range of feasible measures associated with the eTRM fuel substitution measures. As the market for fuel substitution moves forward and the disposition of proposed CARB zero-emission rules for space heating

6.A.c
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Healdsburg Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Potential Forecast Memo (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) and water heating become clearer, the results are useful for program planning and modification purposes. Fuel substitution and electrification are described separately, with a focus for fuel substitution on the 2026-2029 timeframe, prior to the modeling assumption of proposed CARB rules coming into effect in 2030.

The Healdsburg fuel substitution opportunity identifies a market opportunity from 2026-2029 of 737 net equivalent MWh (eMWh).1This result grows from 102 net ekWh in 2026 to 278 net ekWh in 2029. Electricity sales are expected to increase by 178 MWh due to in-program measures over the 2026-2029 timeframe. Figure 2 provides program opportunities related to eMWh, MWh load increases, the combined residential and non-residential sectors, as well as the total net eMWh savings. Fuel substitution savings beyond 2029 are solely based on cooking measures, which may be speculative and subject to change given program design decisions and priorities.

FIGURE 2. NET INCREMENTAL FUEL SUBSTITUTION PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY (MWH) AND SAVINGS Table 3, below, includes the specific inputs used to create Figure 2. The annual energy and demand impacts are provided. The energy impacts are shown as a percentage of forecasted sector-level and total sales.

TABLE 2 10-YEAR FUEL SUBSTITUTION ENERGY RESULTS, ENERGY AND DEMAND ALL Sectors (eMWh
saved)
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Total Incremental
Program Opportunity
(eMWh saved)
126 186 257 345 2 2 3 3 2 2
Res Incremental Program
Opportunity 105 160 223 304 2 2 2 3 2 2
Non-Res Incremental
Program Opportunity 22 27 33 41 0 0 0 0 0 0
ALL Sectors (actual MWh
growth)
Total Incremental
Program Opportunity
(MWh growth)
-25 -36 -50 -67 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
1 Fuel substitution savings are calculated by converting therm savings from gas to equivalent kWh (ekWh). Therm savings are multiplied by 29.3 to create ekWh and divided by 1,000 to create eMWh. The increased electricity from these loads is subtracted from the eMWh to arrive at the net ekWh or net eMWh of savings.
-100
-50
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
MWh
Total Incremental Program Opportunity
(eMWh Saved)
Total Incremental Program Opportunity
(MWh Growth)
Total Incremental Program Opportunity
(net eMWh)

6.A.c
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Healdsburg Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Potential Forecast Memo (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) ALL Sectors (eMWh
saved)
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
Res Incremental Program
Opportunity -19 -29 -41 -56 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
Non-Res Incremental
Program Opportunity -6 -7 -9 -10 0 0 0 0 0 0
ALL Sectors (net eMWh
savings)
Total Incremental
Program Opportunity (net
eMWh)
102 150 207 278 1 1 1 2 1 1
Res Incremental Program
Opportunity 85 130 182 248 1 1 1 1 1 1
Non-Res Incremental
Program Opportunity 16 20 25 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Incremental
Program Opportunity as a
% of Total Sales
-0.032% -0.047% -0.064% -0.086% -0.001% -0.001% -0.001% -0.001% -0.001% -0.001% Res Incremental Program
Opportunity as a % of
Res Sales
-0.068% -0.104% -0.145% -0.197% -0.003% -0.003% -0.004% -0.004% -0.003% -0.003% Non-Res Incremental
Program Opportunity as a
% of Non-Res Sales
-0.012% -0.014% -0.017% -0.021% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% ALL Sectors (kW) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Total Incremental Program
Opportunity -4 -6 -8 -11 0 0 0 0 0 0
Res Incremental Program
Opportunity -3 -5 -6 -9 0 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Res Incremental Program
Opportunity -1 -1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0
The Healdsburg electrification efficiency opportunity identifies a market opportunity from 2030-2035 of 240 MWh in savings. This result is driven by the proposed CARB zero-emission rules and possible energy efficiency adoption level that could come through programs. These results are predicated on the proposed CARB rules, but indicate a significant program opportunity in the future should those rules come to pass. Figure 3 provides the program opportunity for energy savings relative to possible load growth driven by the proposed CARB rules and share of total energy sales after adding the impact of the proposed CARB rules to the baseline forecast. These savings and impacts are highly speculative and dependent on the implementation and timing of proposed CARB rules, as well as future program design decisions.

6.A.c
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Healdsburg Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Potential Forecast Memo (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) FIGURE 3. NET INCREMENTAL ELECTRIFICATION EFFICIENCY PROGRAM SAVINGS AND LOAD IMPACTS (MWH)
Table 4, below, includes the specific inputs used to create Figure 3. The annual energy and demand savings opportunities are provided, along with annual load growth factors.

At a glance, Healdsburg’s fuel substitution and electrification results include:
 Growing net eMWh program savings opportunities through 2029, followed by a sharp decline to the modeled impact of proposed CARB rules.
 Minor load growth from fuel substitution programs through 2029.  A large growth in electrification efficiency opportunities from 2030-2035, with substantial opportunities to offset load growth.

Detailed Results
GDS has provided Healdsburg with a detailed results file which includes the summary information described above, as well as additional detailed results. The results file includes the following information:
 10-yr gross incremental and cumulative annual energy and demand impacts from fuel substitution and electrification efficiency
 20-yr incremental annual market impacts by sector impacts from fuel substitution and electrification efficiency load and demand growth, as well as program impacts

0.00%

0.01%

0.02%

0.03%

0.04%

0.05%

0.06%

0.07%
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035
MWh
Total Incremental Program Opportunity Savings
Total Load Increase After Electrification Efficiency Program Electrification Efficiency Share of Total Sales After Adding CARB-Driven Electrification to Baseline Forecast

6.A.c
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Healdsburg Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Potential Forecast Memo (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) TABLE 3 10-YEAR ELECTRIFICATION EFFICIENCY ENERGY RESULTS, ENERGY AND DEMAND ALL Sectors (MWh) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Total Incremental Increased Electricity 0 0 0 0 1,252 1,250 1,248 1,246 1,242 1,238 Res Incremental Increased Electricity 0 0 0 0 1,002 999 996 992 988 983 Non-Res Incremental Increased
Electricity 0 0 0 0 251 251 252 253 254 255
Total Incremental Program Opportunity
Savings 0 0 0 0 27 32 37 43 48 53
Res Incremental Program Opportunity
Savings 0 0 0 0 18 22 26 29 33 37
Non-Res Incremental Program
Opportunity Savings 0 0 0 0 8 10 11 13 15 16
Total Load Increase After
Electrification Efficiency Program 0 0 0 0 1,226 1,218 1,211 1,203 1,194 1,185 Res Load Increase After Electrification
Efficiency Program 0 0 0 0 983 977 970 963 955 947
Non-Res Load Increase After
Electrification Efficiency Program 0 0 0 0 243 242 241 240 239 238 Total Incremental Program Opportunity
as a % of Total Sales 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% 0.04% 0.05% 0.05% 0.06% 0.06% Res Incremental Program Opportunity
as a % of Res Sales 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.06% 0.07% 0.09% 0.10% 0.11% 0.12% Non-Res Incremental Program
Opportunity as a % of Non-Res Sales 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.03% 0.03% ALL Sectors (kW) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Total Incremental
Program Opportunity 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 3 4 4
Res Incremental
Program Opportunity 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
Non-Res Incremental
Program Opportunity 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3

6.A.c
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Healdsburg Energy Efficiency and Fuel Substitution Potential Forecast Memo (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) 19TH EDITION‒2025
EnergyEfficiency
INCALIFORNIA’SPUBLICPOWERSECTOR

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………..………….3 Program Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Resources and Tools…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 Sources of Funding………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……13 Appendix A – Publicly Owned Utility Narratives…………………………………………………………….…..A–1 Appendix B – Calculation Reference…………………………………………………………………………………..B–1

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This report would not be possible without the substantial contributions of the following individuals:

Project Managers: Derek Dolfie, California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA) Emily Lemei, Northern California Power Agency (NCPA)
Brandon Czworniak, Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA) Heather Heinbaugh
Alameda Municipal Power
Brian Zimmerman
Anaheim Public Utilities
Paul Reid and Liza Sagun
Azusa Light & Water
Amber Rockwell
City of Banning
Carrie Pahua
City of Biggs
Drew Kidd
Burbank Water & Power
Jessica Sutorus and Adrianne Rogers
City of Colton
Aneta Badalian and Ruzan Soloyan
Glendale Water & Power
Hugo Valdez and Sabrina Barber
Imperial Irrigation District
Terra Sampson
City of Healdsburg
Theresa Phillips
Lassen Municipal Utility District
Astrida Trupovnieks
City of Lodi
Steven Valle
City of Lompoc
Armen Saiyan, Damon Turney, Melanie Kwong, and
Luke Sun
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
Queta Maldonado, Marisol Vidauri-Sandoval, and
Chelsea Moniz
Merced Irrigation District
Esmeralda Alvarez, Kathleen Fossan, and Samantha
Perea
Modesto Irrigation District
Tanya Dunlap
City of Moreno Valley
Tim Scott
City of Palo Alto Utilities
Gordon Algermissen
Pasadena Water & Power
Vanessa Xie
City of Pittsburg
Emily Compton
Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative
Trina Valdez and Deborah Allen
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Sarah Brookins and Kamryn Hutson
City of Redding Electric Utility
Kirsten Rosales
Riverside Public Utilities
Rachel Marmorstein
Roseville Electric
Jamie Arbizo
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Daniel Young, James Hendry, and Bigit Kundu
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
James Takehara
City of Shasta Lake
Mary Medeiros McEnroe
Silicon Valley Power
Steve Keates
Truckee Donner Public Utilities District
Monique Hampton, Willie Manuel, Christian Poley,
and Cory Sobotta
Turlock Irrigation District
Jonathan Sun and Anthony Serrano
Vernon Public Utilities
Len Viejo
ASTRUM Utility Services
Miranda Boutelle and Paul Rich
Efficiency Services Group

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
California’s Publicly Owned Utilities (POUs) continue to collaborate to develop cost-effective Energy Efficiency (EE) programs and report annual results to their customers and the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission) in a consistent and comprehensive manner. This 19 th
edition report presents the latest results from POUs’ wide range of EE programs.

During the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 reporting cycle, POUs expended over $211 million on EE programs for their communities, including low-income customers, resulting in over 304 Gigawatt hours (GWh) of net annual energy savings and reducing peak demand by more than 61 Megawatts (MW). Since the enactment of Senate Bill (SB) 1037 (Kehoe, 2005), public power has spent over $3.113 billion on EE and demand reduction, achieving over 3,588 GWh in net lifecycle energy savings.

California’s POUs are exploring new methods to reduce energy use and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions in a cost-effective manner. As indicated in the utility narratives, many POUs have expanded their electrification and GHG gas reduction efforts, focusing on clean energy solutions that may demonstrate greater cost-effectiveness than remaining EE opportunities.

Appendix A contains additional information on each POU’s portfolio, including program descriptions, expenditures, and energy savings. Appendix B presents a comprehensive outline of the calculations used within the Cost Effectiveness Tool (CET) Reporting Platform (RP) (CET/RP).

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 3

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the Public Utilities Code, each year POUs are required to report the following information to customers and the Energy Commission :
1 • Investments in EE and demand reduction programs.
• Descriptions of each EE and demand reduction program, program expenditures, costeffectiveness of each program, and expected and actual EE savings and demand reduction results.
• Sources for funding of EE and demand reduction programs. • Methodologies and input assumptions that are used to determine cost-effectiveness of programs.
• A comparison of the POUs’ annual EE targets and the POUs’ reported electricity efficiency savings and demand reductions.

This collaborative report compiles the required data from the individual POUs into a comprehensive document in compliance with the California Public Utilities Code.

The State’s POUs supply approximately one-quarter of California’s electricity to a broad range of communities with widely differing climates, customer bases, and economic conditions. This compilation is presented to foster analyses of broader EE trends and offer policymakers datadriven considerations regarding the practical impacts of related policies.

The POUs have long supported California’s EE policies and administered programs to provide financial incentives and rebates to POU customers for investments in a variety of energy-saving measures. The purpose of this report is to reflect on the successes and challenges of the past year, while looking ahead to guide discussions on how to achieve further energy savings in the future.
“
“Energy efficiency is the foundation of deep
decarbonization and is one of the best-established and
most-implemented examples of a distributed, zerocarbon resource.” Energy Efficiency Impact Report 2

1 California Public Utilities Code (Cal. Pub. Util. Code) § 9505. 2 https://energyefficiencyimpact.org/

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 4

PROGRAM RESULTS
This section provides an overview of the EE program results for public power in California during FY 2024. Most POUs manage and implement EE programs on a fiscal year basis; for POUs that operate on a calendar year basis, their respective report results for FY 2024 are equal to that of Calendar Year 2024.
3 In summary, during the 2024 reporting cycle, POUs collectively spent over $211 million on EE programs, resulting in more than 304 GWh of net annual energy savings, with 3,589 GWh of net lifecycle energy savings and reduced peak demand by over 61,582 kilowatts (kW).

TABLE 1: Historic Program Results
Fiscal Year
Net Peak
Savings
(kW)
Net Annual
Savings (MWh)
Net Lifecycle
Savings
(MWh)
Total Utility
Expenditures
2006 52,552 169,303 2,249,214 $54,412,728
2007 56,772 254,332 3,062,361 $63,151,647
2008 82,730 401,919 4,473,801 $103,907,266
2009 117,435 644,260 6,749,912 $146,093,107
2010 93,712 522,929 5,586,299 $123,433,250
2011 81,121 459,459 4,604,364 $132,372,795
2012 82,561 439,710 4,638,521 $126,936,631
2013 89,305 521,478 5,722,100 $134,475,230
2014 110,437 568,980 6,414,228 $169,940,735
2015 124,807 644,703 7,836,316 $162,896,993
2016 107,925 771,592 10,253,633 $154,796,668
2017 113,549 861,942 11,991,602 $226,386,251
2018 129,244 638,656 8,267,536 $218,730,235
2019 147,405 646,281 7,312,304 $260,675,319
2020 126,522 475,631 5,221,787 $261,918,171
2021 81,596 254,310 2,850,853 $158,527,378
2022 70,858 361,940 4,265,855 $223,075,217
2023 87,510 355,286 4,114,639 $180,313,119
2024 61,582 304,555 3,588,787 $211,236,782
Total 1,817,623 9,297,266 109,204,122 $3,113,279,522

3 POU fiscal years run from July 1 to June 30, except for the following POUs who operate on a calendar year basis: Imperial Irrigation District, Merced Irrigation District, Modesto Irrigation District, Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Co-op, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Truckee Donner Public Utility District, and Turlock Irrigation District.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 5 As shown in Table 1, public power has collectively spent over $3.113 billion on EE programs, resulting in 109,204 GWh in net lifecycle energy savings since 2006 and avoided the development of 1,817 MW of generation resources to serve peak demand during that time.

Table 1 also shows that Net Annual Savings continue to be below that realized prior to 2020, indicating that there has been a significant shift in the energy efficiency savings available for utility programs.

This year’s report has been updated to more accurately account for energy savings from electrification measures. To calculate the savings for electrification measures with fuel substitution, positive therm savings are converted to an equivalent kWh and combined with the negative kWh savings, resulting in a net equivalent kWh savings. Savings for electrification measures are included in the energy efficiency totals in Tables 1-10.

California’s POUs continue to support the statewide goal of doubling EE by 2030 under the Energy Commission’s direction. Using the Energy Commission’s methodology to determine cumulative energy savings, POUs’ cumulative first-year savings from FY 2015 through FY 2024 equals 4,953 GWh, as presented in Table 2 below. The POUs’ energy efficiency results are influenced by a number of factors, including the lingering effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, which continues to impact both program delivery and participation rates. Additionally, the market for easily implemented energy-saving measures is approaching saturation, which is limiting potential savings from many traditional EE programs. Compounding these challenges are ongoing budget constraints and limitations in workforce capacity, which further constrain the scope of EE initiatives.

TABLE 2. California POU Cumulative 1st Year Energy Savings Comparison Table 3, shown on the next page, provides a comprehensive summary of the EE savings for all POUs’ respective EE Portfolios in FY 2024. The 16 largest utilities subject to Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) requirements account for the majority of savings within the public power community.

As in past years, the two largest POUs, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) and Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), accounted for 61% of the total POU savings during the 2024 reporting cycle. Taken as a group, the 16 IRP POUs produced 96% of the total savings. The remainder of the savings were realized by 25 smaller POUs located throughout California.
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
644.7 771.6 861.9 638.7 646.3 475.6 254.3 361.9 355.3 304.6 4,953 5,826 Net 1st Year Savings per Installation Year (GWh) Cumulative Savings
CEC Cumulative
Savings Target

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector
— 20256
TABLE 3. EE Program Results by Utility

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 7 Table 4 breaks down the statewide results by end-use. While lighting programs once again account for the largest share (32%) of the gross annual EE program savings, total savings from lighting programs continue to trend downwards.

TABLE 4. EE Program Results by End-Use Category

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 8 Table 5 presents the statewide EE program results by sector. In 2024, the Commercial and Industrial (C&I) sectors account for approximately half of California POUs’ annual energy savings (50%); the overall percentage of C&I savings has been trending down over the past three years. In comparison, the proportion of EE savings from residential programs has increased, resulting in 45% of the gross annual EE program savings.

TABLE 5. EE Program Results by Sector
Table 6, on the next page, presents the statewide EE program results by building type.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector
— 20259
TABLE 6. EE Program Results by Building Type

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 10 Table 7 compares the actual savings in 2024 to the POUs’ adopted annual targets for each utility. In total, the actual energy savings were approximately 35% below the forecasted targets for 2024. Every four years, POUs are required to identify potentially achievable energy efficiency savings and establish annual targets for energy efficiency for the next 10-year period.

The targets for 2024 were established in 2021.

TABLE 9. Forecast vs. Actual for Installation Year 2024 3F 4 4F
5 4 To be consistent with EE savings reported in Table 3, Annual targets exclude codes and standards savings. 5 Not all Small, Non-IRP POUs are included in this list because they either did not develop forecasts for 2024, or did not have any energy savings in 2024.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 11

RESOURCES AND TOOLS
This section provides an overview of the technical resources, analytical tools, methodologies, and input assumptions used or developed by public power to evaluate its EE program and develop EE targets, in accordance with the Public Utilities Code.6 EE Cost-Effectiveness Tool and Reporting Platform
Energy Platforms, LLC developed a cloud-based EE cost-effectiveness tool and reporting platform (CET/RP) to improve POUs’ tracking and evaluation of program performance and to support the development of reports in compliance with state and federal reporting requirements. This tool was launched in 2019 to calculate the cost-effectiveness of EE and demand reduction measures and programs and to summarize and report the related program expenditures and energy savings. The model includes all of the traditional benefit-cost ratio calculation methodologies used industry-wide to evaluate EE resource programs: Total Resource Cost (TRC), Program Administrator Cost (PAC), Ratepayer Impact (RIM), and Participant Cost Test.

Using this tool, POUs can analyze individual efficiency measures or full portfolios to determine the potential savings and cost-effectiveness before implementation. POUs are able to create unique programs and measures for their utility – and may choose to share them with other POUs collaboratively. The model also allows each POU to be able to specify many key inputs, including, but not limited to, the following:
• retail rates,
• hourly load shapes,
• hourly GHG emissions curves,
• hourly avoided cost, and
• overhead allocations by measure, programs, portfolio, sector, and/or end-use.

The tool allows POUs to manage reference libraries of measures, avoided costs, load shapes, and GHG emissions, allowing useful tracking and comparative scenario analyses for integrated planning purposes. The CET/RP has undergone recent updates to fully integrate the statewide electronic TRM (eTRM) and enable reporting of gas savings and equivalent kWh for fuel substitution measures. Energy Platforms, LLC continues to update and improve the platform to enhance reporting functionality.

6 Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 9505(a)(4).

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 12 Technical Reference Manual
POUs contracted for the development of a POU technical reference manual7(TRM) in 2013, and replaced DEER as the basis for which most POUs calculate the energy savings of their programs.

The POU TRM has since been updated in 2016, 2017, and 2025. Deviations from the TRM for individual utilities are noted in Appendix A
The TRM provides the methods, formulas, and default assumptions used for estimating energy savings and peak demand impacts from EE measures and projects in a user-friendly format.

POUs use energy savings estimates to report program accomplishments and measure progress toward program goals. EE measures are documented and classified as either unit energy savings measures, semi-custom measures, or custom measures. The TRM includes nonresidential and residential measures, presenting each measure type in separate sections, grouped by technology type.

In addition, public power continues its involvement in the California Technical Forum’s (CalTF) eTRM, an online repository for statewide deemed measures for California. 8 NCPA, SCPPA,
SMUD, and LADWP are members of the CalTF Policy Advisory Committee, which consists of statewide EE stakeholders who advise on the organization's vision, mission, and guiding principles, and affirm the annual Work Plan. The eTRM is now integrated into both the POUs’ energy efficiency reporting platform and the POU TRM.

Evaluation, Measurement & Verification
California Public Utilities Code requires each POU to make available to its customers and the Energy Commission the results of any independent evaluation that measures and verifies the EE savings and the reduction in energy demand achieved by its EE.9 The Evaluation, Measurement, & Verification (EM&V) process relies on the approaches articulated in the National Action Plan for EE, adopted CPUC protocols, and the innovation and expertise of firms experienced in program evaluation. EM&V reports help to define the effectiveness of individual programs with the intent of improving future offerings. Key findings from the EM&V reports confirm high realization rates for reported energy savings.10

7 California Municipal Utilities Association Savings Estimation Technical Reference Manual, 3rd. Ed. 2017. https://www.cmua.org/energy-efficiency-technical-reference-manual. 8 For more information on the CalTF, visit: http://www.caltf.org/. 9 Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 9505(d).
10 See: https://www.cmua.org/emv-reports.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 13

SOURCES OF FUNDING
This section provides an overview of the POUs’ sources of funding for its investments in EE and demand reduction programs, as required by the Public Utilities Code.11 The POUs collectively spent $211 million in FY 2024 from a combination of Public Goods Charge (PGC) funds, Capand-Trade (C&T) allowances, and General Fund monies.

Public Goods Charge
The PGC is a “non-bypassable” usage-based charge on local distribution services collected by POUs in accordance with the Public Utilities Code.12 The PGC is available to fund investments in the following:
• Cost-effective demand-side management services to promote EE and energy conservation,
• New investment in renewable energy resources and technologies, • Research, development, and demonstration programs for the public interest to advance science or technology not adequately provided by competitive and regulated markets, and
• Services provided for low-income electricity customers.

Cap-and-Trade Allowances
The California C&T program allows utilities to use proceeds from the sale of freely allocated allowances to invest in EE programs to reduce GHG emissions. Expenditures explicitly noted as acceptable include but are not limited to equipment rebates and building retrofits.

Funds are generated once a quarter as part of CARB’s regular C&T auctions, but the level of available revenues is expected to increase over time as minimum auction prices have escalation factors that are applied once a year.13
General Fund
POUs also support EE improvements and social good in the communities that they serve by using funds from their general operating reserves through programs such as home improvement and retrofit projects, appliance recycling and replacement programs, disconnection assistance programs for DACs, and income-qualified bill assistance discounts

11 Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 9505(a)(3).
12 Id. § 385.
13 California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 17, § 95801.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-1 Appendix A – POU Narratives
Appendix A consists of detailed narratives of each POU’s EE programs and general descriptions of the utilities, presented in alphabetic order.

TABLE 10. Annual EE Program Summary

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-74

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
City of Healdsburg at a Glance
• Climate Zone: 2
• Customers: 6,157
• Total annual retail sales: 82,201 MWh
• Annual Retail Revenue: $16,076,672
• Annual energy efficiency expenditures for reporting year: $229,639 • Gross annual savings from reporting year portfolio: 210 MWh City of Healdsburg Overview
The City of Healdsburg’s Electric Department manages a comprehensive energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction program for residential and commercial customers by incentivizing energy conservation as well as peak load reduction. For residential customers, rebates help drive installations of a variety of energy efficiency and efficient electrification measures.

Residential rebates are offered in the following areas: appliances, heating and cooling, and weatherization. Commercial rebates are predominately for heat pump projects or site-specific lighting upgrades. For commercial customers, rebates can also include custom programs when analysis demonstrates savings. This custom rebate approach allows greater flexibility and variety of incentives to the end users. These energy rebates and other greenhouse gas Residential, 27
Commercial, 44
Electrification, 140
Gross Energy Savings (MWh)
Residential Commercial Industrial Agricultural Other Low Income T&D Electrification

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-75 reduction programs are predominately supported by proceeds from the Cap-and-Trade Program allocations.

Major Program and Portfolio Changes
During 2024, Healdsburg Electric continued implementing a new multi-family program for appliance replacements in income-qualified multi-family properties. Healdsburg Electric has also continued the promotion and implementation of existing rebate programs, making minor modifications as needed to improve the programs. New in 2024, Healdsburg Electric also updated electric vehicle (EV) programs and launched a Home Energy Load Management program for managed EV charging and smart thermostat control. Additionally, Healdsburg Electric is supporting an in-depth energy audit of the Wastewater Reclamation Facility, one of the highest electricity consumers in the City, to identify energy efficiency opportunities for the treatment facility.

Program and Portfolio Highlights
The City of Healdsburg continued implementation of the strategies and actions outlined in its citywide Climate Mobilization Strategy to help reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Healdsburg. One of these programs is the Appliance Replacement Program for income-qualified multi-family properties, which completed 5 pre-assessment audits to determine equipment eligibility in the identified properties and collaborated with a local non-profit organization to receive a grant award for the non-profit group’s support with outreach and on-the-ground implementation of the program moving forward.

Commercial, Industrial & Agricultural Programs
The City offers the following commercial programs:
• Commercial Lighting Rebates: This program engages local lighting and electrical contractors to promote and install energy-efficient lighting upgrades through technical assistance and financial incentives available from the Electric Department. Adjustments limiting the rebate eligibility will likely be made to this program in 2025 due to new building codes and health and safety regulations regarding the sale of mercury light fixtures.
• Commercial HVAC Rebates: The Electric Department offers commercial customers a variety of HVAC rebates. There are rebate offerings for heat pump HVAC systems and heat pump water heaters to promote efficient electric space heating and cooling and water heating.
• Electric Kitchen Equipment: The Electric Department offers rebates for efficient electric commercial kitchen equipment, based on the California Energy Wise program. A onetime additional electrification rebate is also available to support switching from natural gas appliances to efficient electric appliances.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-76 • Custom EE Programs: The Electric Department will consider custom energy efficiency programs for site-specific consumption. The Electric Department requires that its contractor review and endorse all custom programs. This review may result in a small cost adder to the proposed project, but confirms the estimated savings and allows greater flexibility for the program. The Electric Department retains the sole right to approve or deny custom projects. The in-depth energy audit of the Wastewater Reclamation Facility is expected to result in one or more custom program rebates. The audit is being supported by Public Benefits Funds to identify innovative and costeffective energy efficiency opportunities for the treatment facility, which had $25,459.56 in consultant and program staff costs in 2024.

Residential Programs
The City offers the following residential programs:
• Residential Heat Pump Rebates: The Electric Department offers rebates for residential and small business customers who install high performance heat pump HVAC systems and/or heat pump water heaters. Higher rebate amounts are available for replacing an existing natural gas appliance with an efficient electric heat pump. • Weatherization and Building Envelope Rebates: The Electric Department provides financial incentives for property owners who invest in home weatherization such as ceiling insulation, wall insulation, and efficient window replacement projects. • Laundry Rebates: The Electric Department offers incentives for high performance clothes washers to encourage energy efficiency and water conservation. Clothes dryer rebates are also offered to further encourage energy efficiency and electric clothes drying.
• Device Rebates: The Electric Department also provided rebates for variable speed pool pumps and smart thermostats. The smart thermostat rebate ended in late 2024 with the launch of the Home Energy Load Management program. However, smart thermostat rebates are still available for low-income customers who enroll their new thermostat in the load management program. The pool pump rebate will likely be discontinued in 2025 as well.
• Electric Stove: The Electric Department offers an electric stove/cooktop rebate to promote electric cooking in place of cooking with natural gas. To inform customers regarding electric cooktops, specifically induction cooktops, Healdsburg Electric also offers a free induction cooktop loaner for electric customers interested in cooking with electricity rather than natural gas. The loaner program includes pans compatible with induction cooktops.
• Multi-Family Income-Restricted Properties: The Electric Department continued development and implementation of an appliance replacement program for multifamily income-restricted properties. The program includes replacing old inefficient appliances with efficient electric appliances, starting with dishwashers and refrigerators.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-77 Of the 8 identified properties, 5 have completed a pre-assessment to verify equipment eligibility. It is the responsibility of the property manager to solicit appliance quotes and coordinate the installation, which has stalled program progress at the properties given the property managers’ multiple priorities and day-to-day property management demands. Healdsburg Electric collaborated with a local non-profit focused on Spanishspeaking outreach and support to apply for the Community Climate Implementation Fund grant. The non-profit, Corazon Healdsburg, was selected in early 2025 and will provide additional on-the-ground support to property managers to assist them in coordinating the appliance replacements and also support multi-family residents that may need help swapping their food and belongings during the appliance replacements.

During the program, the non-profit will also promote additional programs in which the property management or residents could participate.

Complementary Programs
The City offers the following complementary programs:
• Low-Income Programs: The City actively supports a low-income discount for incomequalified customers. This program was expanded during COVID to include customers with income at 80% or below area median income. Currently, this discount supports approximately 565 families, or about 11% of the City’s residential customers. Incomequalified customers receive 25% off their electric bill through this program. In 2024, electric bill discounts totaled $100,524.44 with staff administration and overhead costs of $68,998.36, totaling $169,522.80 for the program. The low-income bill discount is the primary program supported by Public Benefits Funds.
• Electric Vehicles: The City offers an EV Discount for residents who drive a battery electric vehicle and switch to the Time of Use rate. This program is no longer accepting new applications as of late 2024 and will officially end in June 2025. The new Home Energy Load Management program is replacing the EV Discount Program and provides better management of peak energy demands caused by EV charging. • Public EV Charging: Additionally, the City maintains 12 public charging stations with discounted charging rates located at City Hall. The user fee structure was updated in 2024 to better recover electric costs and discourage charging during evening peak hours. A 50% discount on the user fees is available for low-income customers.

Healdsburg Electric took ownership of 2 additional charging stations in a new development area in 2024 and is actively working to expand public charging opportunities. Healdsburg Electric also offers a commercial level 2 EV charger rebate to encourage workplace charging and charging during the day when abundant solar is available.
• Home Energy Load Management: Healdsburg Electric launched its Home Energy Load Management Program in late 2024 for managed EV charging and smart thermostat

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-78 control. Low-income EV owners that do not have a home charger can also qualify for an EV charger rebate, if they enroll the charger and EV in the load management program. • E-bikes: Healdsburg Electric offers an e-bike rebate for residents who purchase an e-bike to replace driving trips. This program provides various levels of rebates relative to customer income and purchase location to help offset the cost of purchasing an e-bike.

In 2023 and 2024, Healdsburg Electric also had coupons available for low-income customers to try the e-bike share program.
• Technical Consulting on all-electric construction: The City implemented a Reach Code in 2019, which was updated in 2022, that required electric space and water heating.

Although the Reach Code is no longer being enforced, the City still offers free technical consulting through a consultant engineering firm to support builders and contractors interested in all-electric construction.
• Green Rate: The Electric Department offers a voluntary opt-in 100% renewable electricity rate for an approximately $0.2 additional charge per kWh. Roughly 8% of the City’s electricity usage is attributed to customers enrolled in the Green Rate. All municipal accounts are on the Green Rate and make up the majority of this usage. • Renewable Energy Programs: The City continues to see PV solar array installations in both residential and commercial sectors. At the end of 2024, the City had interconnected a total of 6.87 MWac of solar capacity and 0.79 MW of battery capacity.

This includes the City's 3 MWac floating photovoltaic (FPV) system at the City’s Water Reclamation Facility. The system provides about 8% of community-wide annual electric needs. In 2024, the system generated 5,950 MWh directly into the City’s distribution system and offset roughly .6 MW of the City’s peak coincident demand. • Water Conservation: The City offers multiple water conservation programs, such as lawn conversion, low-flow toilets, irrigation controllers, and more. During the multi-year drought significantly impacting Healdsburg, the City had increased promotion of these rebates. Customers continued their water conservation in 2024 with an approximately 11% reduction in water consumption, compared to before the drought. Water conservation can help reduce the amount of electricity needed for treating and conveying water. Funding for water conservation programs is primarily funded by the City’s water department and regional conservation grants.

Evaluation, Measurement & Verification Studies
EM&V previously completed by the City is available at www.cmua.org.

Major Differences or Diversions from CA POU TRM for Energy Savings In 2024, Healdsburg Electric predominately relied on the California eTRM streamlined values for savings calculations. Fuel substitution calculations provide the negative kWh savings and positive therm savings, which are converted to claim the total equivalent energy savings in kWh.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-79 For measures not included in the eTRM (such as windows, LEDs, and pool pumps), Healdsburg Electric relied on the 2017 CMUA TRM. For measures without an offering option in the eTRM (such as electric resistance clothes dryer fuel substitution), Healdsburg Electric relied on actual equipment model information. Savings for the Commercial Lighting Program are calculated based on the actual equipment replaced and installed.

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-80 TABLE Healdsburg-1. Energy Efficiency Program Results by End Use Summary by End Use Resource Savings Summary Cost Test Results End Use Gross Peak
Savings (kW)
Gross Annual
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Gross Lifecycle
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Peak
Savings (kW)
Net Annual
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Lifecycle
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Lifecycle GHG
Reductions (Tons)
Total Utility
Cost PAC TRC Utility ($/kWh)
Appliance & Plug Loads 0 1,393 24,296 0 1,393 24,296 -3 $4,937 -0.31 -0.16 0.283 HVAC - Heat Pump 0 113,200 1,698,007 0 113,200 1,698,007 220 $104,702 0.63 0.32 0.082 Service & Domestic Hot Water 0 25,085 250,853 0 25,085 250,853 38 $18,096 0.65 0.80 0.087 Electrification 0 139,678 1,973,156 0 139,678 1,973,156 255 $127,735 0.60 0.33 0.085 Appliance & Plug Loads 0 3,721 40,025 0 1,598 16,959 5 $2,122 0.78 0.50 0.153 Building Envelope 2 17,003 340,065 1 7,754 155,083 34 $15,048 0.83 0.35 0.143 HVAC - Cooling 0 3,781 34,327 0 2,004 18,193 5 $2,006 0.88 0.87 0.131 HVAC - Heat Pump 2 7,139 107,079 1 3,579 53,680 17 $12,826 0.47 0.51 0.319 Lighting - Indoor 10 38,971 474,855 9 32,382 392,467 133 $32,315 1.24 1.31 0.104 Energy Efficiency 14 70,615 996,351 11 47,316 636,382 194 $64,318 0.96 0.75 0.132 Appliance & Plug Loads 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37,585 0.000
Low-Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37,585 0.000
EE, Low Income and Electrification 14 210,294 2,969,507 11 186,995 2,609,538 449 $229,639 0.60 0.39 0.116 C&S and T&D $0
Utility Total 14 210,294 2,969,507 11 186,995 2,609,538 449 $229,639 0.60 0.39 0.116

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-81 TABLE Healdsburg-2. Energy Efficiency Program Results by Sector Summary by Sector Resource Savings Summary Cost Test Results Sector Gross Peak
Savings (kW)
Gross Annual
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Gross Lifecycle
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Peak
Savings (kW)
Net Annual
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Lifecycle
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Lifecycle GHG
Reductions (Tons)
Total Utility
Cost PAC TRC Utility ($/kWh)
Commercial 0 13,099 196,478 0 13,099 196,478 40 $12,744 1.06 0.89 0.087 Residential 0 126,580 1,776,677 0 126,580 1,776,677 216 $114,991 0.55 0.29 0.085 Electrification 0 139,678 1,973,156 0 139,678 1,973,156 255 $127,735 0.60 0.33 0.085 Commercial 12 43,632 544,767 10 34,616 425,983 142 $41,797 1.05 1.12 0.124 Residential 2 26,983 451,584 1 12,700 210,399 51 $22,522 0.81 0.42 0.150 Energy Efficiency 14 70,615 996,351 11 47,316 636,382 194 $64,318 0.96 0.75 0.132 Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37,585 0.000
Low-Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37,585 0.000
EE, Low Income and Electrification 14 210,294 2,969,507 11 186,995 2,609,538 449 $229,639 0.60 0.39 0.116 C&S and T&D $0
Utility Total 14 210,294 2,969,507 11 186,995 2,609,538 449 $229,639 0.60 0.39 0.116

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Energy Efficiency in California’s Public Power Sector — 2025 A-82 TABLE Healdsburg-3. Energy Efficiency Program Results by Building Type Summary by Building Type Resource Savings Summary Cost Test Results Building Type Gross Peak
Savings (kW)
Gross Annual
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Gross Lifecycle
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Peak
Savings (kW)
Net Annual
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Lifecycle
Energy Savings
(kWh)
Net Lifecycle GHG
Reductions (Tons)
Total Utility
Cost PAC TRC Utility ($/kWh)
Multiple 0 139,678 1,973,156 0 139,678 1,973,156 255 $127,735 0.60 0.33 0.085 Electrification 0 139,678 1,973,156 0 139,678 1,973,156 255 $127,735 0.60 0.33 0.085 Multiple 3 28,425 474,160 1 12,723 209,299 51 $28,979 0.63 0.52 0.194 Other Commercial 10 36,571 438,855 8 31,086 373,027 126 $30,534 1.24 1.32 0.103 Residential 1 4,271 69,856 1 2,699 45,968 15 $4,118 1.24 0.29 0.125 Residential - Single-Family 0 1,348 13,480 0 809 8,088 2 $687 1.17 0.74 0.103 Energy Efficiency 14 70,615 996,351 11 47,316 636,382 194 $64,318 0.96 0.75 0.132 Residential - Multi-Family 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37,585 0.000
Low-Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $37,585 0.000
EE, Low Income and Electrification 14 210,294 2,969,507 11 186,995 2,609,538 449 $229,639 0.60 0.39 0.116 C&S and T&D $0
Utility Total 14 210,294 2,969,507 11 186,995 2,609,538 449 $229,639 0.60 0.39 0.116

6.A.d
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: 2025 POU EE Report - Healdsburg Excerpt (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Rebate
# of
Rebates
Total kWh*
Saved
(Annually - Net)
Total kWh*
Saved
(Lifetime - Net)
GHG* Tons
Reductions
(Lifetime - Net)
Heat Pump HVAC 36 116,779 1,751,686 237
Heat Pump Water Heater 6 25,085 250,853 38
Smart Thermostat 14 2,004 18,193 5
Weatherization (Insulation & Windows) 11 7,754 155,083 34 Laundry (Washers & Dryers) 16 286 2,834 -2
Electric Cooktop 11 1,896 30,334 1
Lightbulb Giveaways 200 1,296 19,440 7
Pool Pump 2 809 8,088 2
Commercial Lighting 2 31,086 373,027 126
Total 186,995 2,609,538 449
The state-wide Energy Efficiency report for California publicly-owned utilities has been posted! With the help of our energy programs, the community was able to save 186,995 kWh of energy during 2024. That’s approximately the annual electric use of 32 average homes in Healdsburg!

ENERGY EFFICIENCY REPORT
2024 results
*Due to the need to claim savings in terms of kWh,
fuel substitution calculations used the factor of 29.3 to convert therms into kWh and claim the equivalent kWh savings.

6.A.e
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: 2024 Healdsburg Energy Programs Summary (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Category+A1:L30 Rebate Rebate Amount Unit
Estimated kWh
Savings
Estimated therm
Savings
Equivalent kWh
Savings
Rebate $/kWh
Annual Saved GHG Savings
Rebate $/MTCO2e
Annual Saved Incentive Change Eligibility Change
Residential ‐ Fuel Sub Electric Cooktop ‐ gas to electric, new construction $ 500.00 Cooktop ‐188 15 258 1.94 $ 0.07 7,673 $ No Change ‐ Remove $50,000 maximum rebate
cap for existing income‐restricted MF, with
utility pre‐approval for project
Add ENERGY STAR requirement,
Clarify that portable 1‐2 burner units
do not qualify
Residential ‐ Fuel Sub Heat Pump Clothes Dryer ‐ gas to electric $ 175.00 Dryer ‐122 13 249 0.70 $ 0.06 3,075 $ No Change Reduce to ENERGY STAR with
minimum CEF 4.50
Residential ‐ Fuel Sub Heat Pump HVAC ‐ gas to electric, no previous AC $ 2,000.00 Household/ account ‐1007 166 3842 0.52 $ 0.79 2,520 $ No Change ‐ Remove $50,000 maximum rebate
cap for existing income‐restricted MF, with
utility pre‐approval for project
Change to rebate per household/account
instead of per outdoor unit
Simplify SEER/HSPF requirements tominimum SEER2 16/HSPF2 8 Residential ‐ Fuel Sub Heat Pump HVAC ‐ gas to electric, with previous AC $ 2,000.00 Household/ account ‐492 121 3061 0.65 $ 0.60 3,322 $ No Change ‐ Remove $50,000 maximum rebate
cap for income‐restricted MF, with utility pre‐
approval for project
Change to rebate per household/account
instead of per outdoor unit
Simplify SEER/HSPF requirements to
minimum SEER2 16/HSPF2 8
Residential ‐ Fuel Sub Heat Pump Pool Heater ‐ gas to electric $ 1,000.00 Water Heater ‐1700 332 8028 0.12 $ 1.62 618 $ New rebate COP of 5.8 minimum, pool cover proof
required
Residential ‐ Fuel Sub Heat Pump Water Heater ‐ gas to electric $ 2,000.00 Water Heater ‐1414 185 4014 0.50 $ 0.86 2,313 $ No Change ‐ Remove $50,000 maximum rebate
cap for existing income‐restricted MF, with
utility pre‐approval for project
No Change (ENERGY STAR with
minimum UEF 3.30)
Residential Attic Insulation ‐ existing buildings only $ 0.50 Sq ft 0.3 0.01 1 0.70 $ 0.00 4,901 $ Change ‐ Only one incentive amount No Change (R‐44+ final condition),
must add R‐11 or more to existing
Residential Clothes Washer ‐ existing buildings, new construction $ 75.00 unit 46 7 242 0.31 $ 0.04 1,908 $ No Change No Change (ES Most Efficient, front‐
loading)
Residential
Heat Pump Clothes Dryer ‐ electric to electric, new
construction $ 75.00 unit 100 ‐1 75 1.00 $ 0.00 19,842 $ No Change Reduce to ENERGY STAR with
minimum CEF 4.50
Residential
Heat Pump HVAC ‐ electric to electric, new construction, or gas back up $ 500.00 Household/ account 705 0 703 0.71 $ 0.06 8,583 $ Change ‐ Reduce incentive amount
Change to rebate per household/account
instead of per outdoor unit
Simplify SEER/HSPF requirements tominimum SEER2 16/HSPF2 8 Residential
Heat Pump Water Heater ‐ electric to electric, new
construction $ 500.00 Water Heater 1085 0 1085 0.46 $ 0.09 5,545 $ Change ‐ Reduce incentive amount No Change (ENERGY STAR with
minimum UEF 3.30)
Residential Pool Pump Remove ‐ no claimable savings
Residential Wall Insulation $ 1.00 Sq ft 2 0 4 0.25 $ 0.00 1,743 $ Change ‐ Increase incentive amount No Change (R‐13+ final condition, only
homes built before 1988)
Residential Windows Remove ‐ no claimable savings
Res ‐ Low Income Only Dishwasher ‐ Appliance Replacement Program $ 700.00 Dishwasher 200 0 200 3.50 $ 0.02 42,116 $ No Change No Change (ENERGY STAR), Expand to
additional MF properties if approved
budget allows
Res ‐ Low Income Only Refrigerator ‐ Appliance Replacement Program $ 1,000.00 Refrigerator 600 0 600 1.67 $ 0.05 20,055 $ No Change No Change (ES Most Efficient), Expand
to additional MF properties if
approved budget allows
Res ‐ Low Income Only Smart Thermostat $ 200.00 Thermostat 57 11 388 0.52 $ 0.06 3,093 $ No Change No Change (ENERGY STAR, compatible
with Optiwatt)
Commercial‐Fuel Sub Heat Pump HVAC, >65 kBTU ‐ gas to electric $ 500.00 per ton ‐354 46 983 0.51 $ 0.21 2,353 $ Change ‐ Reduce inventive amount Change ‐ minor correction to match
POU TRM IEER & COP minimums
Commercial‐Fuel Sub Heat Pump HVAC, <65 kBTU ‐ gas to electric $ 500.00 per ton ‐106 63 1751 0.29 $ 0.33 1,528 $ No Change Change ‐ Reduce to SEER 16/HSPF 8.7 Commercial‐Fuel Sub Heat Pump Water Heater ‐ gas to electric $ 4,000.00 Water Heater ‐12620 1332 26408 0.15 $ 6.01 665 $ Change ‐ Increase incentive amount Change ‐ Size 75 gallons maximum
(ENERGY STAR minimum UEF 3.30),
larger heat pump water heater
systems to do as custom
Commercial
Heat Pump HVAC, <65 kBTU ‐ electric to electric, new
construction, gas back up $ 100.00 per ton 24 0 24 4.18 $ 0.00 50,258 $ Change ‐ Reduce incentive amount Change ‐ Reduce to SEER2 16.2

6.A.f
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Rebate Change Summary (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs) Commercial Kitchen Equipment NA ‐ based on state‐wide program NA ‐ based on state‐wide program,
Include new construction
Commercial Custom $ 0.15
per estimated kWh
savings 1 0 1 0.15 $ 0.0001 1,805 $
No Change
(Also includes $250 per kW reduction)
Include gas‐only savings projects as
equivalent kWh
Commercial
Heat Pump HVAC, >65 kBTU ‐ electric to electric, new
construction, gas back up $ 100.00 per ton 18 0 18 5.55 $ 0.00 66,728 $ Change ‐ Reduce incentive amount Change ‐ minor correction to match
POU TRM EER & COP minimums
Commercial
Heat Pump HVAC, Package Terminal, <24 kBTU ‐ electric
to electric, new construction $ 100.00 per ton 99 0 99 1.01 $ 0.01 12,099 $ No Change / Change ‐ Reduce incentive amount Change ‐ use new construction
eligibility efficiency ratings from POU
TRM
Commercial
Heat Pump Water Heater ‐ electric to electric, new
construction $ 2,000.00 Water Heater 13645 0 13645 0.15 $ 1.13 1,764 $ Change ‐ Increase incentive amount Change ‐ Size 75 gallons maximum
(ENERGY STAR minimum UEF 3.30),
larger heat pump water heater
systems to do as custom
Commercial Lighting $ 0.15
per estimated kWh
savings 1 0 1 0.15 $ 0.0001 1,805 $
No Change
(Also includes $250 per kW reduction)
Eligibility and savings estimates will
need to become stricter due to new
health and safety regulations
regarding mercury bulbs, Only early
replacement and/or compared to
standard baseline LED options,
Change focus to controls/sensors and
reducing fixtures/over‐lighting
Key Existing Rebate
New RebateRemoved Rebate
Substantially Reduced Rebate
Savings are estimated averages for the rebate. Claimable savings are subject to change over time as updates are made to the POU TRM Rebate amounts and efficiency requirements are subject to change to ensure program success and effectiveness.

Healdsburg Electric also offers electric transportation, water conservation, and load management programs. This summary only reflects building energy programs.

6.A.f
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Rebate Change Summary (4681 : Energy Efficiency Forecast and Programs)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: Annual Water Supply and Demand Forecast
PREPARED BY: Terry Crowley, Utilities Director
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Receive a report regarding the status of the City's water supply and forecasted water demands through June 2027.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

No community engagement was sought for this item.

BACKGROUND:

With the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the Department of Water Resources (DWR) requires all Urban Water Suppliers to provide their governing boards with yearly water supply and demand updates. The annual update provides the current year’s forecasted water supply and customer demands along with an assumption that the following year will meet drought conditions and restricted water supplies. This information can help communities prepare for water shortages and plan to implement portions of their water supply contingency plans.

Healdsburg’s water supply and demand vary with yearly and seasonal changes. During the winter months water usage is low, and water supplies tend to be plentiful. However, due to summer irrigation demands, Healdsburg’s water usage nearly doubles at a time when our water supplies are the most restricted. This pattern of high summer demand and limited summer water supply creates imbalances between water demands and available water supplies. In future years, with the loss of the Potter Valley Project, these differences in water supply are expected to become more pronounced requiring the City to invest in new and more resilient water sources.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

At the end of March 2025, both Ukiah and Santa Rosa are reporting above average rainfall for the 2024-2025 rain season (114% and 135% respectively). Due to this above average rainfall, regional water supplies and storage levels are strong heading into the dry summer months. At

6.B
Packet Pg. 59
this time there are no indications that water restrictions or curtailments will be needed this summer. While rain and storage levels are above average, there remains a need to be mindful of water use and what future drought years may bring.

The chart below shows Healdsburg’s average water demands and forecasted demands for the fiscal year 2025-26. The average water demands are based upon water produced by the City’s usage during calendar years 2017, 2018, and 2019 (pre-COVID years that are considered “normal” for customer usage). These demands include water system losses, due to leaks and system operations (e.g. flushing of water mains) necessary to provide safe drinking water. The average water usage of 2017, 2018 and 2019 has been reduced by roughly 5% to the predicted 2025-26 water usage. Long-lasting conservation measures, such as lawn conversions and appliance replacements, are helping Healdsburg remain below historic usage numbers.

Healdsburg’s average water demand significantly increases during irrigation months at the same time water supplies are the most constrained. The uppermost line on the graph below indicates the City’s water supplies under normal conditions (full water rights and access to contracted water from Sonoma Water). Under normal conditions the City’s water supply is adequate for current needs and future growth, during years of below average rainfall or prolonged drought there remains a need for conservation.

Fiscal year 2025-26 forecasted water demands (red line) in comparison to available water supplies (blue line).

Healdsburg’s summertime water usage is expected to fall roughly five percent below the 2017- 2019 average due to long-lasting conservation measures achieved during the past several years.

Based upon this forecast, the City’s water supply for fiscal year 2025-26 is sufficient to meet expected customer demand.

6.B
Packet Pg. 60
Per the 2020 UWMP, the Board requires urban water suppliers to further predict water supplies and demands under a single dry-year (drought) condition. For the single-dry year criteria, Healdsburg’s planning criteria are the recent drought years of 2014, 2015, 2021, and 2022. For a conservative approach, City staff assumes 2021 conditions represent the worst-case scenario for a single dry year. During 2021, the City lost the use of all permitted water rights. This left Healdsburg with only a Human Health and Safety (HH&S) exemption to pull water from the Russian River and Dry Creek. Under a petition filed with the Board, Healdsburg requested a total HH&S water limit of 112 gallons per capita day (GPCD). This limit represents the combined needs of both residents, businesses, and institutional needs throughout Healdsburg. This number also represents a roughly 50% decrease in water usage during the summer months.

FY2026-27 forecasted water supplies during a dry-year (blue line) and consumer demands with conservation (red line). Both summertime supply and customer demands assume operating at the minimum limits of Human Health & Safety needs.

To achieve a 50% reduction in water usage the City would need to implement Stage 5 of the current water shortage contingency plan early in the irrigation season. Stage-5 significantly restricts outdoor water usage, initiates water budgets for residential customers, and delays certain types of development. The single dry-year graph shows forecasted water supplies and demands starting July 2026 and running through June of 2027. The demand reduction shown is very similar to summer 2021 water conservation efforts. Again, the dry-year forecast is a planning exercise and not what is expected.

City staff continue to develop alternate water supplies that are not immediately impacted by lowrain years. These projects include aquifer storage and recovery wells (ASR) and the now complete municipal recycled water pipeline. The recycled water pipeline offsets roughly 25-

6.B
Packet Pg. 61
million gallons of potable water and provides a more stable supply of irrigation water for City parks and recreation areas. Additionally, the City was awarded a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for the completion of phase 1 of the ASR wells. Under this grant award City Staff are pursuing options to construct test wells to prove the presents of suitable drinking water, and the ability to both store and recover water placed into these isolated aquifers. In addition to the development of long-term water supply projects, the City will also need continued efforts to implement efficient landscape irrigation.

As part of the most recent water and wastewater rate study, City staff continue to work toward re-establishing pumping capacity along Dry Creek such that the City can better access water stored within Lake Sonoma. Unlike Lake Mendocino, which typically has a single year of water storage, Lake Sonoma has multiple years of water storage and therefore provides a more stable source of water during periodic droughts. With the loss of the Potter Valley Project, Lake Sonoma will also provide an alternative source of water during dry years and years of low storage within Lake Mendocino. Since this supply of water has not been contracted and the pump facilities are yet to be restored, this future supply is not included in the annual outlook. When these two efforts (contracted water and increased pumping capacity) are complete, water supplies during single dry-year scenarios will see measurable improvements.

There is no recommended action with this staff report. Staff are providing this information to meet regulatory requirements and inform the City Council of the current water supplies and demands as well as providing predictions of what a dry year may require in conservation.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

The annual water supply and demand update increases the City Council and Community’s awareness of a finite natural resource. A better understating in this ultimately leads to improved management of our region’s water supply.

ALTERNATIVES:

There are no actions requested, or alternatives provided with this staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact directly associated with this staff report. Continued conservation and development of new water supplies will create a fiscal impact on Healdsburg’s Water Department. Conservation will lower fiscal year revenues and additional projects will increase capital costs as well as ongoing operational costs. Conservation efforts like lawn conversions that have lasting impacts will help lessen the need to develop new water supplies and may help reduce total fiscal impacts by reducing the scale of new projects required to support increased water demands.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

The receipt and review of annual water supply and demand forecasts is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because informational items are not a project since they are not a discretionary action by a governmental agency and will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

6.B
Packet Pg. 62

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project Bid Award PREPARED BY: Clay Thistle, Senior Engineer
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution conditionally awarding the 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project to AGD General Engineering Inc. in the amount of $88,645, authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract; authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and approve contract change orders up to 20% of the original contract amount.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The Project was advertised for public bidding in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat and on the City’s website.

Prior to beginning construction, advance notices will be provided to adjacent properties. They will be advised of potential impacts, parking restrictions, and the planned work duration. The City project manager’s direct contact information will be provided for additional information and for any concerns that arise during the construction process.

BACKGROUND:

Public Work staff collects and maintains a list of sidewalks, curb and gutter and other concrete within the public right-of-way needing repair. Where vertical offsets occur, they can typically be repaired through a horizontal saw-cutting contract performed on a periodic basis. Certain locations that are not able to be cut and must be replaced. This project will repair seventeen of these locations. The repairs are often needed due to tree roots and subsurface soil movement.

On February 27, 2025, and March 4, 2025 the 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project was advertised and bids opened on March 27, 2025.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

A notice inviting bids was advertised in accordance with all applicable procedures, and the City

6.C
Packet Pg. 63
received six bids. The lowest apparent and responsive bid was from AGD General Engineering Inc. in the amount of $88,645. The other bids received ranged from the apparent second lowest bid of $92,000 to the highest bid of $163,884. The lowest bid was lower than the engineer’s estimate of $126,450 by approximately 30%. This can be attributed to a competitive bidding climate evidenced by the number of bids received.

Staff recommends a 20% contingency to cover unforeseen conditions for a total project budget of $106,374. A contingency beyond the standard 15% is recommended due to the numerous locations and potential variability of field conditions when conforming to existing conditions.

The bid from AGD General Engineering Inc. satisfies the bidding requirements for the project as described in the bid instructions. There are no irregularities with the bid and no protests to the bid have been filed as of the time of this report. Staff has verified that AGD General Engineering Inc. possesses the required license and is otherwise qualified to complete the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Recycling will be used to divert much of the construction waste from landfill. Concrete and asphalt removed will be delivered to local recyclers for reuse in new paving and concrete products.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council could choose not to award the project and reject all bids. However, in that case, the TDA3 funds would lapse and need to be reapplied for, resulting in the necessary repairs going unfixed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

On June 28, 2023, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) approved allocation(s) of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds to the City of Healdsburg for FY-2023-24 in the amount of $125,000.

The Adopted Budget included the FY 23-24 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project ST012 funded by $125,000 in Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA) funding and $4,394 in Measure T funding for a total project budget of $129,394. Due to staff constraints this project was carried forward into the current fiscal year and bid as the FY 24-25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project. Eligible cost to be reimbursed by the TDA funding must be incurred before June 30, 2026 and drawn by September 30, 2026.

The proposed contract is for $88,645 with an additional 20% contingency authorized for unforeseen conditions and potential additional costs bringing the total construction amount to $106,374. There are sufficient appropriations remaining in the Adopted Budget after design costs to support the proposed contract and additional staff time to administer the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

The proposed 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project involves the repair and maintenance of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use therefore is exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15302(c).

6.C
Packet Pg. 64
A Notice of Exemption has been filed with the Office of Planning and Research, and the County Clerk.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution
Location Map

6.C
Packet Pg. 65

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. -2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEALDSBURG CONDITIONALLY AWARDING THE 24/25

SIDEWALK REPAIR AND GAP CLOSURE PROJECT TO AGD
GENERAL ENGINEERING INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $88,645,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

CONTRACT, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

NEGOTIATE AND APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS
UP TO 20% OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
WHEREAS, the notice inviting bids for the 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project was advertised in accordance with applicable procedures that resulted in the City receiving six bids; and
WHEREAS, the apparent lowest bid was submitted by AGD General Engineering Inc. in the amount of $88,645; and
WHEREAS, staff has verified that AGD General Engineering Inc. possesses the required license(s) and is otherwise qualified to complete the project; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the bid proposal and determined that there are no irregularities; and
WHEREAS, staff recommend awarding the contract to by AGD General Engineering Inc. in the amount of $88;645 and
WHERAS, staff recommend a 20% contract contingency for a total construction budget of $106,374.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby:

1. Finds the proposed 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project involves the repair and maintenance of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of use therefore is exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15302(c). Staff has filed a Notice of Exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and County Clerk.

2. Conditionally awards the 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project to AGD General Engineering Inc.

3. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project contract.

6.C.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Resolution (4815 : 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project Bid Award) Resolution No. -2025

Page 2 ends

4. Authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and approve contract change orders up to twenty percent (20%) of the bid amount, issue the notice of award to AGD General Engineering Inc.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAINING: Councilmembers:

SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ____________________________________ Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.C.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Resolution (4815 : 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project Bid Award)

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Location Map (4815 : 24/25 Sidewalk Repair and Gap Closure Project Bid Award)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement
PREPARED BY: Griselda Villarreal, Administrative Analyst II STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Expand Affordable Housing Opportunities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute and enter into the first amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the City of Healdsburg, Freebird Development Company, LLC, Saggio Hills Lot 14, L.P., and Saggio Hills Lot 3, L.P., for the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project at 450 Parkland Farms Boulevard and amending the Adopted Budget.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The City of Healdsburg ("City") and Freebird Development Company, LLC ("Project Wide Developer") have engaged in community outreach efforts related to future development of the affordable housing project on approximately 12.4 acres of land ("Affordable Housing Land") within the Saggio Hills Project site. Members of the public participated in the City Council's evaluation of developers in late 2020 and selection of the Developer and the approval of an Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement ("ENA") effective February 16, 2021, as well as during public hearings before the Planning Commission on November 8, 2022, related to design review (“DR 2022-05”) and tentative subdivision map (“TM 2022-02”) applications; thereafter, on April 3, 2023, the City Council approved TM 2022-02 and the Disposition and Development Agreement. A public hearing for the final map was held on April 7, 2025, providing an additional opportunity for community input as part of the application process.

BACKGROUND:

On April 3, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-2023, approving the Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") between City of Healdsburg and Freebird Development Company, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Project Wide Developer"), for the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project ("Project"). The Project will include the development of up to 118 affordable housing units in four (4) phases, the preservation of open space, outdoor

6.D
Packet Pg. 69
amenities for residents, a community building, publicly accessible trails and public infrastructure improvements.

On April 17, 2023, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1228, thereby approving the Development Agreement (“DA”) between the City and Project Wide Developer, which became effective thirty (30) days thereafter on May 17, 2023. The DA was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 2, 2023, as Instrument No. 2023024652.

On April 21, 2023, the City and Project Wide Developer executed the DDA, which became effective on May 17, 2023, simultaneously with the effectiveness of the DA.

Effective as of February 1, 2024, pursuant to the Partial Assignment and Assumption of DA and DDA, executed by and between the City, Project Wide Developer, and Saggio Hills Lot 14, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Phase 1 Developer”), the Project Wide Developer assigned to Phase 1 Developer, and Phase 1 Developer assumed from Project Wide Developer, all rights, title, interest, and obligations under the DDA and DA related to the development of the Phase 1 Project on the Phase 1 Parcels (the “Phase 1 Assignment”).

The Phase 1 Project is comprised generally of 48 Rental Affordable Housing Units on Lot 14 (47 units deed-restricted for affordable housing for at least 55 years, and one unit designated for the manager), an approximately 3,067 square foot community building with associated hardscape and landscape improvements on Lot 2, public improvements comprised generally of sidewalks and streetlights along Passalacqua Drive and Parkland Farms Boulevard, installation of a rectangular rapid flashing beacon at a crossing of Parkland Farms Boulevard between Parcel B and Lot 2, and publicly accessible open space areas enhanced with pedestrian trails on Parcel A.

On September 1, 2024, in accordance with the Partial Assignment and Assumption of DA and DDA, executed by and between the City, Project Wide Developer, and Saggio Hills Lot 3, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Phase 2 Developer”), the Project Wide Developer assigned to Phase 2 Developer, and Phase 2 Developer assumed from Project Wide Developer, all right, title, interest, and obligations under the DDA and DA related to the development of Project Phase 2 on the Phase 2 Parcels (the “Phase 2 Assignment”). The Phase 2 Project is comprised generally of 42 Rental Affordable Housing Units on Lot 3 and outdoor amenities such as community gardens, picnic areas or a small farm on Lot 1.

On April 7, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-2025, approving the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Final Map (the “Final Map”) for the subdivision of the Property, creating Parcel A and B, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, and 15, in conformance with TM 2022-02 and as contemplated by the DA and DDA.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The DDA sets forth the terms and conditions relating to: i) the disposition of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, and 15 and Parcel A of the Final Map from the City to Project Wide Developer in four phases - Parcel B is being retained by the City for open space purposes; (ii) the development and maintenance of the Project Improvements constructed in each phase by Project Wide Developer; and (iii) the imposition of covenants running with the land to ensure the long-term affordability

6.D
Packet Pg. 70
of the Affordable Units constructed in each phase of the Project.

In accordance with its obligations under the terms of the DDA, the Phase 1 Developer has secured substantially all the necessary financing to develop and construct the Phase 1 Project.

Close of escrow for the transfer of fee title to the Phase 1 Parcels from the City to Phase 1 Developer, as well as all of the construction financing required for the Phase 1 Project, is scheduled for May 14, 2025, with construction anticipated to commence shortly thereafter.

As Saggio Hills nears the finish line for the first phase of the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project and, as is common for affordable housing developments with varied sources of financing, there is a need to amend the DDA to facilitate the transaction or to correct overlooked items. In this instance staff is recommending the DDA be amended to address an overlooked aspect governing Pre-Approved Transfers, and to increase the amount of the Public Improvement Loan.

Further, the lenders involved in this first phase have also identified a few matters they would like to have addressed to clarify their obligations; accordingly, Sections 209.3 and 1019 of the Agreement is amended to clarify that a successor owner acquiring title to a Project Phase through a foreclosure proceeding is not responsible for indemnification obligations set forth in Sections 209.3 and 1019 accruing prior to the date of acquiring title through foreclosure; Section 611.3 of the Agreement is amended to provide that notices regarding a default by a developer of a Project Phase be provided to the investors of a Project Phase so that they may be able to cure the default if the developer of the Project Phase does not; and a new Section 909 be added to the Agreement to clarify that upon the close of escrow for a Project Phase, that the owners of said Project Phase will not have any liability for any other Project Phase.

Pre-Approved Transfers
Section 103 of the DDA addresses the issue of transfers or assignments of rights under the DDA by the Project Wide Developer to another entity. Generally speaking, until a certificate of completion is issued for a project phase, any transfer or assignment of an interest under the DDA requires the City’s prior approval. However, section 103.3 contains a list of Pre-Approved Transfers that do not necessitate the City’s prior approval, such as the granting of an easement to facilitate construction of the project or securing a mortgage to finance construction of the project, among other exceptions. One form of transfer that always occurs in tax credit financing, which is the primary source of financing for affordable housing, involves the transfer of limited partner interests to a tax credit investor; further, the nature of tax credit transactions are such that the tax credit investor never gets admitted until the day of closing. So, this is an issue that recently arose as a result of the last rounds of due diligence for the Phase 1 Closing. Accordingly, to facilitate the Phase 1 Closing, staff is recommending to amend Section 103.3 of the DDA to add subsection (h) thereto as follows:
(h) The admission of limited partners to the Developer’s limited partnership in connection with tax credit financing as part of a Phased Closing, and any subsequent transfer of such limited partnership interests, including any transfer of stock or equity in the limited partners that does not change management or operational control of the Project.

Section 103.3 has general application to all of the Phased Closings and thus, since the DDA has

6.D
Packet Pg. 71
been partially assigned to the Phase 2 Developer pursuant to the terms of the Phase 2 Assignment, that is why the Phase 2 Developer is also a signatory to this First Amendment even though we do not have an anticipated date for the Phase 2 Closing.

Public Improvement Loan
Section 802 of the DDA provides for an interest free loan of $1,151,170, due and payable in 55 years, for costs associated with the construction of public infrastructure and publicly accessible open space areas enhanced with pedestrian trails on Parcel A (“Public Improvement Loan”). The Public Improvement Loan of $1,151,170, funded by monies received from Sonoma Luxury Resorts as the Saggio Hills developer upon the conveyance of the affordable housing land to the City, will be evidenced by a promissory note (Attachment No. 14 to DDA) and secured by a deed of trust.

In order to ensure necessary funding for construction of the Phase 1 Project, city staff is recommending that the City Council authorize an increase in the amount of the Public Improvement Loan by an additional one million dollars (“$1,000,000”), raising the total sum of the Public Improvement Loan amount to two million one hundred fifty-one thousand one hundred seventy dollars (“$2,151,170”). The additional sum of $1,000,000 will be funded with Measure S revenues, the 2016 hotel tax dedicated to affordable housing services and programs.

This $1,000,000 portion of the Public Improvement Loan will bear interest at the rate of 3% per annum, with annual payments based on available residual receipts, and otherwise due and payable in 55 years. Because of the different loan terms and source of funding, this $1,000,000 portion of the Public Improvement Loan will be evidenced by a separate residual receipts promissory note (Attachment No. 16 to DDA) and secured by the same deed of trust.

Close of Escrow
As previously noted, the close of escrow for the transfer of the Phase 1 Parcels (Parcel A, Lot 2 and Lot 14) from the City to Phase 1 Developer, is scheduled for May 14, 2025, with construction anticipated to commence shortly thereafter. By entering into the First Amendment to the DDA, the City will facilitate the admission of the tax credit investor, a critical and necessary component of the financing required for the Phase 1 Project, and the financing of the public improvements associated with Phase 1, supporting the development of necessary infrastructure and public amenities, and ensuring the Phase 1 Project progresses in a timely and effective manner.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

The Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project underwent an environmental review as part of the tentative map approval process. Additionally, an environmental impact report (“Saggio Hills Project EIR”) was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res.

Code 21000, et seq.) (“CEQA”), (State Clearinghouse No. 2003062025), which analyzed the environmental impacts of development of the Saggio Hills Project. The Saggio Hills Project EIR was certified by the City Council on January 31, 2011, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was adopted by Resolution No. 15-2011. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164, the City prepared an Environmental Checklist & Addendum to the Saggio Hills Project EIR, dated September 2022 ("Addendum"). This document can be found in the Planning Department's files for the Project at Healdsburg City Hall, Community Development Center, 401

6.D
Packet Pg. 72
Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Recommended actions: Adopt a resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute and enter into the First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the City, Project Wide Developer, Phase 1 Developer, and Phase 2 Developer and thereby amend Section 103.3 of the DDA related to Pre-Approved Transfers and Section 802 of the DDA regarding the Public Improvement Loan for the Phase 1 Project.

2. Incorporate specific modifications into the resolution prior to taking Council action.

3. The Council may choose not to adopt the resolution to approve the execution and entry into the First Amendment to the DDA, which could delay or impact the close of escrow for the Project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The financial implications of this project are outlined below, highlighting the loan terms, funding structure, and anticipated revenue for the City, in accordance with the terms of the two (2) separate Promissory Notes. The initial loan of $1,151,170 (the “Initial Loan”) was approved by council on 04/03/2023 and the promissory note was included as Attachment No. 14 to the DDA.

The Promissory Note included with this report as Attachment No. 16 to the DDA is for the additional loan of $1,000,000 being authorized by this First Amendment to DDA (the “Additional Loan”).
• Initial Loan: The City of Healdsburg is providing an Initial Loan of $1,151,170 to the Phase 1 Developer, Saggio Hills Lot 14, L.P., interest free. The total principal amount of $1,151,170 is due and payable on the 55th anniversary of the date the Certificate of Completion is recorded for the project site.
• Additional Loan: The City of Healdsburg is providing an additional loan as provided by the First Amendment to the DDA of $1,000,000 to Phase 1 Developer. This additional loan amount will accrue 3% simple annual interest on the outstanding principal balance.

The outstanding principal amount is due and payable on the 55th anniversary of the date the Certificate of Completion is recorded for the project site. • Payment Structure: There are no payments required on the Initial Loan of $1,151,170, other than when the entire amount is due and payable on the 55th anniversary of the date of the Certificate of Completion noted above. Annual payments toward principal and interest on the additional loan of $1,000,000 are based on a residual receipt’s method, with the Borrower paying the City a proportional share of 50% of all Surplus Cash (amount by which Gross Revenue exceeds Annual Operating Expenses for the project), generated by the project. Payments are first applied to late charges, fees, and accrued interest, with any remaining amounts applied to the principal. Again, all outstanding principal and interest is due and payable on the 55th anniversary of the date of the Certificate of Completion.
• Security: The total amount of the Public Improvement Loan of $2,151,170, as evidenced by two (2) separate Promissory Notes attached as Attachment No. 14 to the DDA for the

6.D
Packet Pg. 73
initial loan of $1,151,170 (the “Initial Loan”), and as Attachment No. 16 to the DDA for the additional loan of $1,000,000 (the “Additional Loan”) is secured by a Deed of Trust executed by the Borrower, which will encumber the Phase 1 Parcels described in the agreement. This provides the City with security interests in the property.

The Initial Loan of $1,151,170 is intended to support the completion of deferred public improvements required in the Development Agreement for the Saggio Hills Project. The Initial Loan is funded by monies received from Sonoma Luxury Resorts as the Saggio Hills developer upon the conveyance of the affordable housing land to the City. The additional loan of $1,000,000 is intended to close the remaining funding gap for the Phase 1 Project of the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project and is proposed to be funded by the Measure S Affordable Housing Fund. Staff propose amending the Fiscal Year 24-25 budget to increase appropriations in the Measure S Affordable Housing Fund by $1,000,000 for the additional loan disbursement.

Additionally, in compliance with the DDA, the Developer has established a deposit account with the City to cover consultant costs related to the implementation of the agreement. As a result, the costs incurred by the City Attorney for preparing and reviewing the proposed documents have been deducted from the developer’s deposit account.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

See above discussion under Environmental Stewardship.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution - Saggio Hills DDA Amendment
Exhibit A - Budget Amendment
Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement

6.D
Packet Pg. 74
4928-7855-1091 v4

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. ___ -2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND ENTER INTO THE FIRST

AMENDMENT TO DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG, FREEBIRD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC,
SAGGIO HILLS LOT 14, L.P., AND SAGGIO HILLS LOT 3, L.P.,

FOR THE SAGGIO HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
AT 450 PARKLAND FARMS BOULEVARD AND AMENDING

THE ADOPTED BUDGET
WHEREAS, on April 3, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-2023, approving the Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") between City of Healdsburg and Freebird Development Company, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Project Wide Developer"), for the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project ("Project"), involving the development of up to 118 affordable housing units in four (4) phases, the preservation of open space, outdoor amenities for residents, a community building, publicly accessible trails and public infrastructure improvements; and
WHEREAS, On April 17, 2023, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1228, thereby approving the Development Agreement (“DA”) between the City and Project Wide Developer, which became effective thirty (30) days thereafter on May 17, 2023, and was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 2, 2023, as Instrument No. 2023024652; and WHEREAS, the DDA established the terms and conditions for the transfer of City property to the Project Wide Developer and the financing, construction, and long-term affordability of the Project to be constructed thereon; and
WHEREAS, effective February 1, 2024, pursuant to the Partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement and Disposition and Development Agreement, executed by and between the City, Project Wide Developer, and Saggio Hills Lot 14, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Phase 1 Developer”), the Project Wide Developer assigned to Phase 1 Developer, and Phase 1 Developer assumed from Project Wide Developer, all rights, title, interest, and obligations under the DDA and DA related to the development of Phase 1 Project on the Phase 1 Parcels (“Phase 1 Assignment”); and
WHEREAS, effective September 1, 2024, pursuant to the Partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement and Disposition and Development Agreement, executed by and between the City, Project Wide Developer, and Saggio Hills Lot 3, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Phase 2 Developer”), the Project Wide Developer assigned to Phase 2 Developer, and Phase 2 Developer assumed from Project Wide Developer, all rights, title, interest, and

6.D.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Resolution - Saggio Hills DDA Amendment (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First Amendment DDA) Resolution No. -2025

Page 2 ends

4928-7855-1091 v4
obligations under the DDA and DA related to the development of Phase 2 Project on the Phase 2 Parcels (“Phase 2 Assignment”); and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-2025, approving the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Final Map (“Final Map”) for the subdivision of the Property, creating Parcel A and B, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, and 15, in conformance with TM 2022-02 and as contemplated by the DA and DDA; and
WHEREAS, City, Project Wide Developer, Phase 1 Developer and Phase 2 Developer desire to enter into a First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement ("Agreement") to amend (i) Section 103.3 of the DDA to allow for the admission of a tax credit investor as a Pre-Approved Transfers, (ii) Section 802 of the DDA to increase the amount of the Public Improvement Loan by one million dollars ($1,000,000), above the existing amount of one million one hundred fifty one thousand one hundred seventy dollars ($1,151,170.00), to a total loan amount of two million one hundred fifty one thousand one hundred seventy dollars ($2,151,170), (iii) Sections 209.3 and 1019 of the DDA to clarify that a successor owner acquiring title to a Project Phase through a foreclosure proceeding is not responsible for indemnification obligations set forth in Sections 209.3 and 1019 accruing prior to the date of acquiring title through foreclosure, (iv) Section 611.3 of the DDA to provide that notices regarding a default by a developer of a Project Phase be provided to the investors of a Project Phase so that they may be able to cure the default if the developer of the Project Phase does not, and (v) add a new Section 909 to the DDA to clarify that upon the close of escrow for a Project Phase, that the owners of said Project Phase will not have any liability for any other Project Phase; and WHEREAS, the fulfillment of this First Amendment to Disposition and Development Agreement is in the vital and best interests of City and the health, safety and welfare of its residents and in accord with the provisions of applicable federal, state and local law; and WHEREAS, an environmental impact report (“Saggio Hills Project EIR”) was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code 21000, et seq.) (“CEQA”), (State Clearinghouse No. 2003062025), which analyzed the environmental impacts of development of the Saggio Hills Project. The Saggio Hills Project EIR was certified by the City Council on January 31, 2011, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was adopted by Resolution No. 15-2011. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164, the City prepared an Environmental Checklist & Addendum to the Saggio Hills Project EIR, dated September 2022 ("Addendum"). This document can be found in the Planning Department's files for the Project at Healdsburg City Hall, Community Development Center, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg does hereby:

1. Approve the First Amendment to the Disposition And Development Agreement By And Between the City of Healdsburg, a California municipal corporation, Freebird Development Company, LLC, a California limited liability company, Saggio Hills Lot

6.D.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Resolution - Saggio Hills DDA Amendment (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First Amendment DDA) Resolution No. -2025

Page 3 ends

4928-7855-1091 v4
14, L.P., a California limited partnership, and Saggio Hills Lot 3, L.P., a California limited partnership for the Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, and subject to such minor and clarifying changes consistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Attorney prior to execution hereof, and authorizes the City Manager to take all actions, execute all documents, and take all appropriate actions to implement the DDA, as amended by the First Amendment to the Disposition And Development Agreement in accordance with its terms on behalf of the City of Healdsburg.

2. Approve amending the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget as depicted on the attached Exhibit A.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg this 21st day of April 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.D.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Resolution - Saggio Hills DDA Amendment (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First Amendment DDA) Resolution No.

Exhibit A
Account Number Increase Amount Decrease Amount Description 106-2022-42501-00000 $ 1,000,000 Increase Measure S Affordable Housing Fund Expense for Loan Disbursment to Saggio Affordable Housing Project Phase 1 FY 24-25 Budget Amendment

6.D.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Exhibit A - Budget Amendment (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First Amendment ATTACHMENT NO. 16
4935-7564-4963 v6
989.005/642198

RESIDUAL RECEIPTS PROMISSORY NOTE
(Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project – Phase 1 Project) $1,000,000.00 Healdsburg, California
_______, 2025
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Saggio Hills Lot 14, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the City of Healdsburg, a California municipal corporation (the “City”), in lawful money of the United States of America the principal sum of One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00), together with interest on the outstanding principal balance in accordance with the terms and conditions described herein. Interest shall accrue on the principal balance of this Note outstanding from time to time at the rate of three percent (3%) simple annual interest. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a year of 365 days, and charged for the actual number of days elapsed.

This Residual Receipts Promissory Note (this “Note”) has been executed and delivered pursuant to and in accordance with that certain Disposition and Development Agreement dated April 21, 2023, and executed by and between Freebird Development Company, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Freebird”) and City (the “Agreement”), which Agreement was partially assigned to Borrower in relation to the Phase 1 Project pursuant to that certain Partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement and Disposition and Development Agreement, effective as of February 1, 2024, and executed by and between Freebird, Borrower and City (the “Assignment”), and further amended pursuant to that certain First Amendment to Disposition and Development Agreement dated _____, 2025, and executed by and between Freebird, Borrower and City (“Amendment”) wherein City agreed to increase the amount of the Public Improvement Loan by One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) subject to the terms and conditions of this Note. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement as modified by the Amendment.

This Note is secured by a Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (“Deed of Trust”) dated as of the date hereof, executed by Borrower as trustor for the benefit of City, and encumbering the property described therein. City shall be entitled to the benefits of the security provided by the Deed of Trust and shall have the right to enforce the covenants and agreements contained herein, in the Deed of Trust, and in that certain Rental Affordable Housing Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated as of the date hereof, executed by and between City and Borrower and recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County (the “Regulatory Agreement”). The rent restrictions and other requirements set forth in the Regulatory Agreement shall remain effective for the full term of the Regulatory Agreement and shall survive the repayment of this Note. Collectively, the Agreement, Assignment, Amendment, Regulatory Agreement, Note and Deed of Trust may be referred to herein as the “City Documents”.

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 2
989.005/642198

1. PAYMENTS.

1.1 ANNUAL PAYMENT DATES; MATURITY DATE. Annual payments toward principal and interest accrued on this Note shall be payable on a residual receipts basis with the Proportional Share of fifty percent (50%) of all Surplus Cash (defined below) payable to City as described below. Payments shall be credited first to any unpaid late charges and other costs and fees then due, then to accrued interest, and then to principal. In no event shall any amount due under this Note become subject to any rights, offset, deduction or counterclaim on the part of Borrower. The entire outstanding principal balance of this Note, together with interest accrued thereon and all other sums accrued hereunder shall be payable in full on the date (the “Maturity Date”) which is the fifty-fifth (55th) anniversary of the date upon which the Certificate of Completion is recorded against the Site pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Regulatory Agreement.

1.2 ANNUAL PAYMENTS FROM SURPLUS CASH. By not later than October 1 of each year following the year of the City’s recording of the Certificate of Completion against the Site, Borrower shall pay to City its Proportional Share, reflected as a percentage as defined herein, of all Surplus Cash generated by the Project during the previous calendar year to reduce the indebtedness owed under this Note. “Proportional Share” shall mean the percentage arrived at by dividing the principal amount of this Note by the sum of the principal amount of this Note plus the principal amount of all other loans extended to Borrower by City, State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, and the County of Sonoma for the Project.

No later than August 30 of each year following the year of the City’s recording of the Certificate of Completion against the Site, Borrower shall provide to City Borrower’s calculation of Surplus Cash for the previous calendar year, accompanied by such supporting documentation as City may reasonably request, including without limitation, an independent audit prepared for the Project by a certified public accountant in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The annual report shall include an accounting of deposits to and withdrawals from the Project replacement, operating, and other reserves. City shall have the right to inspect and audit Borrower’s books and records concerning the calculation of Surplus Cash, and to object within sixty (60) days from receipt of Borrower's report. Failure to timely object shall be deemed acceptance of the report. If City does object, City shall specify the reasons for its disapproval, and Borrower shall have thirty (30) days to reconcile any disapproved item. If Borrower and City cannot agree on the amount of Surplus Cash, an independent auditor mutually selected by Borrower and City shall resolve any disputed items. The cost of the auditor shall be paid by Borrower.

No later than November 1 of each year following City’s recording of the Certificate of Completion against the Site, Borrower shall provide to City a proposed budget for the following calendar year which shall include an estimate of Surplus Cash. City will review the proposed budget and, if acceptable, approve it, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided, however, if the proposed budget has not been rejected by City within 30 days of receipt, City shall be deemed to have accepted the budget. If the budget is not acceptable, City shall specify the reasons for disapproval. Once approved, any changes to the budget for

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 3
989.005/642198
discretionary items that exceed ten percent (10%) of the total budget shall require City's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.

1.2.1 “Surplus Cash” shall mean for each calendar year during the term hereof, the amount by which Gross Revenue (defined below) exceeds Annual Operating Expenses (defined below) for the Project. Surplus Cash shall also include net cash proceeds realized from any sale of the Project and any refinancing of permanent loans for the Project, less fees and closing costs reasonably incurred in connection with such sale or refinancing, and any Cityapproved uses of the net cash proceeds of the sale or refinancing.

1.2.2 “Gross Revenue” shall mean for each calendar year during the term hereof, all revenue, income, receipts and other consideration actually received from the operation and leasing of the Project. Gross Revenue shall include, but not be limited to: all rents, fees and charges paid by tenants; Section 8 payments and other rental subsidy payments received for the dwelling units; deposits forfeited by tenants; all cancellation fees, price index adjustments and any other rental adjustments to leases or rental agreements; proceeds from vending and laundry room machines; the proceeds of business interruption or similar insurance; the proceeds of casualty insurance not required to be paid to the holders of Approved Senior Loans (defined below) (provided however, expenditure of such proceeds for repair or restoration of the Project shall be included within Annual Operating Expenses in the year of the expenditure, and with City’s written consent, proceeds of casualty insurance may be excluded from Gross Revenue until the year such proceeds will be expended for repair or restoration of the Project provided that Borrower provides adequate assurance that such proceeds will be expended for such purposes); condemnation awards for a taking of part or all of the Property or the Project for a temporary period; and the fair market value of any goods or services provided to Borrower in consideration for the leasing or other use of any part of the Project. Gross Revenue shall include any release of funds from replacement, operating, and other reserve accounts other than for the purposes for which such reserves were established. Gross Revenue shall not include tenant security deposits, loan proceeds, grant proceeds, capital contributions or similar advances, or interest earned on reserves provided that such interest is dedicated for the purpose for which the applicable reserve was established.

1.2.3 “Annual Operating Expenses” shall mean for each calendar year during term hereof, the following costs reasonably and actually incurred for the operation and maintenance of the Project to the extent that they are consistent with an annual independent audit performed by a certified public accountant using generally accepted accounting principles:
property taxes and assessments; debt service currently due and payable on a non-optional basis (excluding debt service due from residual receipts or surplus cash of the Project) on loans that have been approved in writing by the City and that are secured by deeds of trust senior in priority to the Deed of Trust (“Approved Senior Loans”) in accordance with the Agreement; reasonable property management fees and reimbursements excluding incentive management fees, in amounts in accordance with industry standards for similar residential properties and paid pursuant to a property management agreement approved by City; fees payable to a social services provider, if any, pursuant to an agreement approved by City; premiums for property damage and liability insurance; utility service costs not paid for directly or indirectly by tenants; maintenance and repair costs; fees for licenses and permits required for the operation of the

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 4
989.005/642198
Project; organizational costs (e.g., annual franchise tax payments) and costs associated with accounting, tax preparation and legal fees of Borrower incurred in the ordinary course of business; expenses for security services; advertising and marketing costs; payment of deductibles in connection with casualty insurance claims not paid from reserves; the amount of uninsured losses actually replaced, repaired or restored and not paid from reserves asset management fees in a combined amount not to exceed $25,000, increasing annually by three percent (3%); cash deposits into reserves for capital replacements in an amount no more than $500 per unit per year or such greater amount as reasonably required by the holder of an Approved Senior Loan or as required by a physical needs assessment prepared by a third-party selected or approved by City and prepared at Borrower’s expense; actual payment of any portion of a developer fee (without interest) due in accordance with a financing plan approved by City (provided however, on a cumulative basis, for the purpose of calculating Surplus Cash, the aggregate amount of a developer fee that may be included as a component of Annual Operating Expenses may not exceed the developer fee permitted for the Project by HCD); any required annual monitoring fees payable to the City or other public agency lenders; cash deposits into operating reserves in an amount reasonably approved by City or required by Project lenders or tax credit investors, but only if the accumulated operating reserve does not exceed three (3) months’ projected Project operating expenses; services provided to Project residents as set forth in the approved annual budget; and other ordinary and reasonable operating expenses in accordance with the approved annual budget.

1.2.4 EXCLUSIONS FROM ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES. For the purpose of calculating Surplus Cash, Annual Operating Expenses shall exclude the following:
developer fees (except as permitted pursuant to Section 1.2.3); interest on any deferred developer fees; contributions to Project operating or replacement reserves except as provided in Section

1.2.3; debt service payments on any loan which is not an Approved Senior Loan, including without limitation, unsecured loans or loans secured by deeds of trust which are subordinate to the Deed of Trust; depreciation, amortization, depletion and other non-cash expenses; expenses paid for with disbursements from any reserve account; any amount paid to Borrower, any partner or member of Borrower, or any entity controlled by the persons or entities in control of Borrower. Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation regarding payments to Borrower and related parties, the following fees shall be included in Annual Operating Expenses, subject to applicable limitations set forth in Section 1.2.3 above, even if paid to Borrower, an affiliate of Borrower, or a partner or member of Borrower: fees paid to a property management agent, resident services agent, or social services agent; and subject to Section 1.2.3, repayment of cash advances by Borrower to cover Project operating expense deficits or emergency cash needs of the Project.

Payments to Borrower, its partners, members or affiliates in excess of the limitations set forth in Section 1.2.3 shall not be counted toward Annual Operating Expenses for the purpose of calculating Surplus Cash.

1.2.5 ADJUSTMENT TO OPERATING EXPENSES. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, for the purpose of calculating Surplus Cash, Annual Operating Expenses shall include: (a) the repayment of operating deficit loans provided by Borrower’s limited partner provided however, interest payable on such loans may be included in Annual Operating Expenses only in an amount equivalent to the lesser of (i) interest accrued at the actual interest rate charged for the loan, and (ii) interest accrued at a rate equal to the Applicable

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 5
989.005/642198
Federal Rate, and (b) the amount of any tax credit adjuster or Tax Equivalency Payment (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) that is required to be paid solely from Project cash flow.

1.3 PROCEEDS OF REFINANCING. Borrower shall be obligated to pay to City a Proportional Share of the net cash proceeds realized from any refinancing of the Project, less fees and closing costs reasonably incurred in connection with such refinancing, and any City-approved uses of the net cash proceeds of the refinancing permitted under the Agreement. Such payment shall be in addition to the annual payments due pursuant to Section 1.2 above and shall be applied toward the outstanding balance payable under this Note.

1.4 DUE ON SALE. The entire unpaid principal balance and all interest and other sums accrued hereunder shall be due and payable upon the transfer of an Interest (as defined in Section 103.1 of the Agreement) absent City consent, of all or any part of the Project or the Property or any interest therein other than a Pre-Approved Transfer permitted without City consent pursuant to the City Documents. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this Note shall not be assumable without City’s prior written consent, which consent may be granted or denied in City’s sole discretion.

1.5 PREPAYMENT. Borrower may, without premium or penalty, at any time and from time to time, prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal balance due under this Note, provided that each such prepayment is accompanied by accrued interest on the amount of principal prepaid calculated to the date of such prepayment. Prepayments shall be applied first to any unpaid late charges and other costs and fees then due, then to accrued but unpaid interest, and then to principal. The Regulatory Agreement shall remain in full force for the entire term thereof regardless of any prepayment of this Note.

1.6 MANNER OF PAYMENT. All payments of principal and interest on this Note shall be made to City at 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448 or such other place as City shall designate to Borrower in writing, or by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated by City in writing.

2. DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES.

2.1 EVENTS OF DEFAULT. The occurrence and continuance beyond any applicable cure period of any one or more of the following events shall constitute an event of default hereunder (“Event of Default”):
(A) Borrower fails to pay when due the principal and interest payable hereunder and such failure continues for thirty (30) days after such payment is due. (B) Pursuant to or within the meaning of the United States Bankruptcy Code or any other federal or state law relating to insolvency or relief of debtors (“Bankruptcy Law”), Borrower (i) commences a voluntary case or proceeding; (ii) consents to the entry of an order for relief against Borrower in an involuntary case; (iii) consents to the appointment of a trustee, receiver, assignee, liquidator or similar official for Borrower; (iv) makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or (v) admits in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due.

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 6
989.005/642198
(C) A court of competent jurisdiction enters an order or decree under any Bankruptcy Law that (i) is for relief against Borrower in an involuntary case, (ii) appoints a trustee, receiver, assignee, liquidator or similar official for Borrower or substantially all of Borrower’s assets, (iii) orders the liquidation of Borrower, or (iv) issues or levies a judgment, writ, warrant of attachment or similar process against the Property or the Project, and in each case the order or decree is not released, vacated, dismissed or fully bonded within sixty (60) days after its issuance.
(D) Borrower shall have voluntarily suspended its business or Borrower shall have been dissolved or terminated.
(E) The occurrence of a transfer of an Interest in violation of the City Documents. (F) The holder of any instrument secured by a mortgage or deed of trust on the Project or the Property declares a default and such default remains uncured beyond any applicable cure period such that the holder of such instrument has the right to accelerate payment thereunder.
(G) Borrower fails to maintain insurance on the Property and the Project as required pursuant to the City Documents and Borrower fails to cure such default within five (5) days. (H) Subject to Borrower’s right to contest the following charges pursuant to the City Documents, if Borrower fails to pay prior to delinquency taxes or assessments due on the Property or the Project or fails to pay when due any other charge that may result in a lien on the Property or the Project, and Borrower fails to cure such default within twenty (20) days of the date of delinquency, but in all events prior to the date upon which the holder of any such tax or other lien has the right to foreclose thereon.
(I) If any representation or warranty contained in any City Document, or any certificate furnished in connection therewith, proves to have been false or misleading in any material adverse respect when made and continues to be materially adverse to the City. (J) An Event of Default shall have been declared under any City Document, and remains uncured beyond the expiration of the applicable cure period.

2.2 REMEDIES. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default hereunder, City may, at its option (i) by written notice to Borrower, declare the entire unpaid principal balance of this Note, together with all accrued interest thereon and all sums due hereunder, immediately due and payable regardless of any prior forbearance, (ii) exercise any and all rights and remedies available to it under applicable law, and (iii) exercise any and all rights and remedies available to City under this Note and the other City Documents, including without limitation the right to pursue foreclosure under the Deed of Trust. Borrower shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by or on behalf of City including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with City's enforcement of this Note and the exercise of any or all of its rights and remedies hereunder and all such sums shall be a part of the indebtedness secured by the Deed of Trust. The rights and remedies of City under this Note shall be cumulative and not alternative.

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 7
989.005/642198

2.3 DEFAULT RATE. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, interest shall automatically be increased without notice to the rate of the lesser of ten percent (10%) per annum or the maximum rate permitted by law (the “Default Rate”); provided however, if any payment due hereunder is not paid when due, the Default Rate shall apply commencing upon the due date for such payment. When Borrower is no longer in default, the Default Rate shall no longer apply, and the interest rate shall once again be the rate specified in the first paragraph of this Note. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, if the interest rate charged exceeds the maximum legal rate of interest, the rate shall be the maximum rate permitted by law. The imposition or acceptance of the Default Rate shall in no event constitute a waiver of a default under this Note or prevent City from exercising any of its other rights or remedies.

3. MISCELLANEOUS.

3.1 WAIVERS; AMENDMENTS; BORROWER’S WAIVERS. No waiver by City of any right or remedy under this Note shall be effective unless in a writing signed by City.

Neither the failure nor any delay in exercising any right, power or privilege under this Note will operate as a waiver of such right, power or privilege, and no single or partial exercise of any such right, power or privilege by City will preclude any other or further exercise of such right, power or privilege or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. No waiver that may be given by City will be applicable except in the specific instance for which it is given. No notice to or demand on Borrower will be deemed to be a waiver of any obligation of Borrower or of the right of City to take further action without notice or demand as provided in this Note. There shall be no amendment to or modification of this Note except by written instrument executed by Borrower and City.

To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law Borrower hereby waives presentment, demand, protest, notices of dishonor and of protest and all defenses and pleas on the grounds of any extension or extensions of the time of payment or of any due date under this Note, in whole or in part, whether before or after maturity and with or without notice.

3.2 Borrower’s limited partner(s) shall have the right to cure any default of Borrower hereunder upon the same terms and conditions afforded to Borrower. Any cure tendered by a limited partner of Borrower shall be deemed to be a cure by Borrower and shall be accepted or rejected on the same basis as if tendered by Borrower.

3.3 NOTICES. Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be given in accordance with Section 1001 of the Agreement.

3.4 SEVERABILITY. If any provision in this Note is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, the other provisions of this Note will remain in full force and effect. Any provision of this Note held invalid or unenforceable only in part or degree will remain in full force and effect to the extent not held invalid or unenforceable.

3.5 GOVERNING LAW; VENUE. This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. Any legal action filed in connection with this Note shall be filed in the Superior Court of Sonoma County, California, or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 8
989.005/642198

3.6 BINDING ON SUCCESSORS. This Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and assigns and shall accrue to the benefit of City and its successors and assigns.

3.7 SECTION HEADINGS, CONSTRUCTION. The headings of Sections in this Note are provided for convenience only and will not affect its construction or interpretation.

3.8 RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. The relationship of Borrower and City under this Note is solely that of borrower and lender, and the loan evidenced by this Note and secured by the Deed of Trust will in no manner make City the partner or joint venturer of Borrower.

3.9 TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence with respect to every provision of this Note.

3.10 NONRECOURSE. Except as expressly provided in this Section 3.9, Borrower shall not have personal liability for payment of the principal of, or interest on, this Note, and the sole recourse of City with respect to the payment of the principal of, and interest on, this Note shall be to the Project, the Property and any other collateral held by City as security for this Note; provided however, nothing contained in the foregoing limitation of liability shall:
(A) impair the enforcement against all such security for the Loan of all the rights and remedies of the City under the Deed of Trust and any financing statements City files in connection with the Loan as each of the foregoing may be amended, modified, or restated from time to time; (B) impair the right of City to bring a foreclosure action, action for specific performance or other appropriate action or proceeding to enable City to enforce and realize upon the Deed of Trust, the interest in the Project and the Property created thereby and any other collateral given to City in connection with the indebtedness evidenced hereby and to name the Borrower as party defendant in any such action;
(C) be deemed in any way to impair the right of the City to assert the unpaid principal amount of the Loan as a demand for money within the meaning of Section 431.70 of the California Code of Civil Procedure or any successor provision thereto; (D) constitute a waiver of any right which City may have under any bankruptcy law to file a claim for the full amount of the indebtedness owed to City hereunder or to require that the Project and the Property shall continue to secure all of the indebtedness owed to City hereunder in accordance with this Note and the Deed of Trust; or
(E) limit or restrict the ability of City to seek or obtain a judgment against Borrower to:
(1) recover under any provision of any City Document that obligates Borrower to indemnify City, or
(2) recover from Borrower compensatory damages as well as other costs and expenses incurred by City (including without limitation attorneys’ fees and expenses) arising as a result of the occurrence of any of the following:

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 9
989.005/642198
(a) any fraud or intentional misrepresentation on the part of the Borrower, or any officer, director, member, manager, general partner, or authorized representative of Borrower in connection with the request for or creation of the Loan, or in any City Document, or in connection with any request for any action or consent by City in connection with the Loan;
(b) any failure to maintain insurance on the Property and the Project as required pursuant to the City Documents;
(c) failure to pay taxes, assessments or other charges which may become liens on the Property or the Project (subject to the right to contest as set forth in the Agreement);
(d) the presence of Hazardous Materials on the Property or other violation of the Borrower’s obligations under the City Documents pertaining to environmental matters;
(e) the occurrence of any act or omission of Borrower that results in waste to or of the Project or the Property;
(f) the material misapplication of the Loan proceeds;
(g) the removal or disposal of any personal property or fixtures other than in the normal course of Borrower’s business, or the retention of rents, insurance proceeds, or condemnation awards in violation of the Deed of Trust; (h) the material misapplication of the proceeds of any insurance policy or award resulting from condemnation or the exercise of the power of eminent domain or by reason of damage, loss or destruction to any portion of the Project or the Property; and
(i) the failure of Borrower to pay all amounts payable under this Note in full if Borrower transfers an Interest in the Property in violation of the City Documents.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE.

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4935-7564-4963 v6 10
989.005/642198
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has executed this Note as of the date first written above.

BORROWER:

SAGGIO HILLS LOT 14, L.P.,
a California limited partnership
By: JHC-Saggio Hills Lot 14 LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its managing general partner
By: Jamboree Housing Corporation, Inc.,
a California nonprofit public benefit
corporation, its sole member/manager
By: _________________________
Michael Massie
Chief Development Officer
By: Freebird Saggio Hills Lot 14 LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its administrative general partner
By: Freebird Development Company, LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its sole member/manager
By: _________________________
Robin Zimbler, Manager

6.D.c
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Freebird Residual Receipts Promissory Note - Attachment No. 16 to DDA v5 (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 1
4908-5188-4340, v. 1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and between the

CITY OF HEALDSBURG,
a California municipal corporation,
and

FREEBIRD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
a California limited liability company,
and
SAGGIO HILLS LOT 14, L.P.
a California limited partnership
and
SAGGIO HILLS LOT 3, L.P.
a California limited partnership
for

SAGGIO HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 2
4908-5188-4340, v. 1

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into by and between the CITY OF HEALDSBURG, a California municipal corporation (“City”), FREEBIRD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Developer”), SAGGIO HILLS LOT 14, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Phase 1 Developer”), and SAGGIO HILLS LOT 3, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Phase 2 Developer”), as of the Effective Date set forth in the signature block below.

City, Developer, Phase 1 Developer and Phase 2 Developer are sometimes referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. Effective as of May 17, 2023, the City and Developer executed and entered into that certain Disposition and Development Agreement (the “Agreement”), pertaining to real property located within the City of Healdsburg, County of Sonoma, State of California, and described in Exhibit A attached to the Agreement (hereinafter, the “Site”). The following recitals are a substantive part of this Amendment; capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined are defined in Section 101 of the Agreement.

B. The City and Developer also entered into that certain Development Agreement effective as of May 17, 2023, which was recorded in the Official Records on June 2, 2023 as Instrument No. 2023024652 (the “Development Agreement”), pertaining to the Site.

C. The Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions relating to: (i) the disposition of the Site, excluding Parcel B, to Developer for the development of up to 150 affordable housing units; (ii) the development and maintenance of the Project Improvements by Developer; and (iii) the imposition of covenants running with the land to ensure the long-term affordability of the Affordable Units on the Site.

D. Section 103.3 of the Agreement governs the terms and conditions regarding the transfer or assignment of an Interest in the Agreement by Developer which does not require the City’s prior approval, which Pre-Approved Transfers are meant to facilitate the timely implementation of the terms of the Agreement and development of the project without undermining the City’s oversight.

E. Section 802 of the Agreement provides for a Public Improvement Loan in the amount of ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED FIFTY ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS ($1,151,170.00) to be provided by City to Developer in connection with the Phase 1 Closing and development of the Phase 1 Improvements comprised generally of 48 Rental Affordable Housing Units, an approximately 3,067 square foot community building with associated hardscape and landscape improvements, and Public Improvements comprised generally of sidewalks and streetlights along Passalacqua Drive and Parkland Farms Boulevard, installation of a rectangular rapid flashing beacon at a crossing of Parkland Farms Boulevard between Parcel B and Lot 2, and open space areas enhanced with pedestrian trails on Parcel A.

F. Effective February 1, 2024, the City, Developer and Phase 1 Developer executed and entered into that certain Partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement and Disposition and Development Agreement (the “Phase 1 Assignment”) whereby Developer

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 3
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
transferred, assigned, granted and conveyed to Phase 1 Developer all of its rights, title and interest in and to and the obligations, duties, responsibilities, conditions and restrictions under the Development Agreement and Disposition and Development Agreement to the Phase 1 Parcels and Phase 1 Project.

G. Effective September 1, 2024, the City, Developer and Phase 2 Developer executed and entered into that certain Partial Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreement and Disposition and Development Agreement (the “Phase 2 Assignment”) whereby Developer transferred, assigned, granted and conveyed to Phase 2 Developer all of its rights, title and interest in and to and the obligations, duties, responsibilities, conditions and restrictions under the Development Agreement and Disposition and Development Agreement to the Phase 2 Parcels and Phase 2 Project.

H. To facilitate the Phase 1 Closing, the Phase 1 Developer has requested City to increase the amount of City funding provided in Section 802 of the Agreement by ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) above the existing Public Improvement Loan of ONE MILLION ONE

HUNDRED FIFTY ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS
($1,151,170.00) to a total amount of TWO MILLION ONE HUNDRED FIFTY ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS ($2,151,170.00).

H. City has agreed to increase the amount of City funding as requested by Phase 1 Developer subject to the terms and conditions as provided in this Amendment.

I. To facilitate each of the Phased Closings, Developer has requested that (i) Section 103.3 of the Agreement be amended to allow for the admission of limited partners in connection with tax credit financing as part of a Phased Closing and subsequent transfers of those interests that do not effect a change in the management or operational control of the Project, (ii) Sections 209.3 and 1019 of the Agreement be amended to clarify that a successor owner acquiring title to a Project Phase through a foreclosure proceeding is not responsible for indemnification obligations accruing prior to the date of acquiring title through foreclosure, (iii) Section 611.3 of the Agreement be amended to provide for notices of default be provided to investors of a Project Phase, and (iv) a new Section 909 be added to the Agreement to clarify that upon the close of escrow for a Project Phase, that the owners of said Project Phase will not have any liability for any other Project Phase.

J. The fulfillment of this Amendment is in the vital and best interests of City and the health, safety and welfare of its residents and in accord with the provisions of applicable federal, state and local law.

NOW, THEREFORE, City, Developer, Phase 1 Developer and Phase 2 Developer hereby agree as follows:

1. Consistent with the terms of the Agreement and the Phase 1 Assignment, the term Developer shall mean the Phase 1 Developer in connection with the Phase 1 Project.

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 4
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
Consistent with the terms of the Agreement and the Phase 2 Assignment, the term Developer shall mean the Phase 2 Developer in connection with the Phase 2 Project.

2. Section 101 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following definitions:
“Phase Developer” is defined in Section 103.3 (a).
“Phase Investor” is defined in Section 103.3 (h).

3. Section 103.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
103.3. Pre-Approved Transfers. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, City approval of a transfer or assignment of any Interest shall not be required in connection with any of the following:
(a) Subject to Developer submitting and obtaining City’s approval of the assignment and assumption agreement referred to in Subsection 103.2(c) any transfer or assignment of any Interest to an Affiliate of Developer occurring contemporaneously with and in connection with a Phased Closing (each a “Phase Developer”);
(b) Transfers resulting from the death or mental or physical incapacity of any shareholder of Developer or any constituent thereof; (c) The granting of temporary or permanent easements or permits to facilitate development of the Project Improvements; (d) Any mortgage, deed of trust, or assignment for purposes of financing construction (including design, planning permitting, remediation, site preparation and horizontal and vertical construction) of the Project Improvements; (e) Leasing of Rental Affordable Units to Eligible Households at Affordable Rents;
(f) Sale of Owner-Occupied Affordable Units to Eligible Purchasers at Affordable Sales Price;
(g) A transfer of the ownership interests in Developer, which, combined with any and all previous or simultaneous transfers after the Date of Agreement, represents less than fifty percent (50%) of the equity or beneficial interest of Developer, provided such transfer does not cause a material change in the rights to manage and control Developer;
(h) The admission of limited partners to a Phase Developer, or any other of Developer’s limited partnership(s) in connection with tax credit financing as part of a Phased Closing (each a “Phase Investor”), and any subsequent transfer of such limited partnership interests, including any transfer of stock or equity in the limited

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 5
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
partners that does not change management or operational control of the Project or any Project Phase;
(i) the first transfer of the Property following a foreclosure, and the encumbrance of the Property with any financing obtained in connection therewith (and any financing for acquisition or construction relating to that first transfer); and (j) the refinancing of any senior or junior debt encumbering the Property in an amount equal to the then-outstanding principal balance of the applicable loan, plus the costs of such refinancing, including to provide cash resources to purchase the limited partnership interest, provided that such refinancing is on commercially reasonable terms.

In the event of an assignment or transfer by Developer under Subsection Error! Reference source not found., 101.1(d), or 101.1(f) not requiring City’s prior approval, Developer nevertheless agrees that it shall give at least forty five (45) days prior written Notice to City of such assignment or transfer. In addition, City shall be entitled to review such documentation as may be reasonably required by the City Manager for the purpose of determining compliance of such assignment or transfer with the requirements of Subsection 103.3(a), 101.1(d), or103.3(f).

4. The following sentence is hereby added to the end of each of Section 209.3 and 1019 of the Agreement respectively:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, City hereby acknowledges and agrees the provisions of this section shall not bind a successor owner that acquires title pursuant to a foreclosure, deed in lieu or similar action for any losses damages, liabilities, claims, actions, judgments, court costs, and legal or other expenses first arising or accruing prior to the date such successor owner acquired title to the Property, irrespective of when the indemnification obligations hereunder were discovered.

5. Section 611.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
611.3. Notice of Default to Mortgagee or Deed of Trust Holders and Phase Investors; Right to Cure. With respect to (i) any mortgage or deed of trust granted by Developer or Phase Developer on the Phase 1 Parcels, Phase 2 Parcels, Phase 3 Parcel, or Phase 4 Parcels, and (ii) any Phase Investor, whenever City shall deliver any Notice or demand to Developer or Phase Developer with respect to any breach or default by Developer or Phase Developer hereunder, City shall at the same time deliver to each holder of record of any mortgage or deed of trust on the Phase 1 Parcels, Phase 2 Parcels, Phase 3 Parcel, or Phase 4 Parcels, and each Phase Investor a copy of such Notice or demand. No Notice of default shall be effective as to the holder or Phase Investor, as applicable unless such Notice is given. Each such holder and Phase Investor shall (insofar as the rights of City are concerned) have the right, at its option, within one hundred twenty (120) days after the receipt of the Notice, to cure or remedy or commence to cure or remedy any such default and, with respect to any holder, to add the cost thereof to the mortgage debt and the lien of its mortgage. In the event possession of the Phase 1 Parcels, Phase 2 Parcels,

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 6
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
Phase 3 Parcel or Phase 4 Parcels, or portion thereof, is required to effectuate such cure or remedy, the holder shall be deemed to have timely cured or remedied if it commences the proceedings necessary to obtain possession thereof (with respect to any holder) and the Phase Investor shall be deemed to have timely cured or remedied if it initiates the process necessary to remove the general partner or managing member of the Phase Developer, or any other of Developer’s limited partnership(s), as applicable (with respect to any Phase Investor), within one hundred twenty (120) days, diligently pursues such proceedings to completion, and, after obtaining possession or removal, as applicable, diligently completes such cure or remedy (the foregoing time periods being subject to extension during the period that such holder or Phase Investor is precluded from taking or pursuing any such action as a consequence of any bankruptcy stay or other court order).

Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to permit or authorize such holder to undertake or continue the construction or completion of the Project Improvements applicable to the Project Phase (beyond the extent necessary to conserve or protect such Project Improvements or construction already made) without first having expressly assumed Developer’s or Phase Developer’s obligations to City by written agreement reasonably satisfactory to City. Any such holder or Phase Investor properly completing such Project Improvements applicable to a Project Phase shall be entitled, upon compliance with the requirements of Section 610, to a Certificate of Completion for the Project Phase.

6. Section 802 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
802. Public Improvement Loan. In consideration of Developer’s obligations hereunder, including Developer’s obligation to design, develop, construct, and install the Phase 1 Improvements, inclusive of the Public Improvements in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and the Public Improvement Agreement, City shall provide a loan to Developer in connection with Phase 1 Closing in the amount of TWO MILLION ONE

HUNDRED FIFTY ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS
($2,151,170.00) (the “Public Improvement Loan”). The Public Improvement Loan shall be comprised of two components as follows: (a) the sum of ONE MILLION ONE

HUNDRED FIFTY ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS
($1,151,170.00) which shall bear interest at the rate of zero percent (0%) per annum and the entire balance shall be due and payable on the fifty-fifth (55th) anniversary of the recordation of the Certificate of Completion for the Phase 1 Project, and shall be evidenced in accordance with the terms of the Promissory Note, substantially in the form attached hereto as Attachment No. 14, to be secured by a Deed of Trust, substantially in the form attached hereto as Attachment No. 15, to be recorded against the Phase 1 Parcels, which Deed of Trust shall contain a “due-on sale or further transfer clause” and be subordinate to Developer’s construction and permanent financing for the Phase 1 Project; and (b) the sum of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) which shall bear interest at the rate of three percent (3%) per annum, with residual receipts payments due on an annual basis during the fifty-five (55) year term of the note, and the entire balance shall be due and payable on the fifty-fifth (55th) anniversary of the recordation of the Certificate of Completion for the Phase 1 Project, and shall be evidenced in accordance with the terms of the Residual Receipts Promissory Note, substantially in the form attached hereto as Attachment No. 16, to be secured by a Deed of Trust, substantially in the form attached hereto as Attachment

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 7
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
No. 15, to be recorded against the Phase 1 Parcels, which Deed of Trust shall contain a “due-on sale or further transfer clause” and be subordinate to Developer’s construction and permanent financing for the Phase 1 Project.

7. The following new Section 909 is hereby added to the Agreement:
909. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, following a Phased Closing, in no event shall the Phase Developer or Phase Investor of such applicable closed Project Phase, or any party owning all or part of such Project Phase thereafter, have any liability under the Agreement as to any other portion of the Site which is the subject to the Agreement (other than the Project Phase for which it owns) or to cure any default under the Agreement relating from any other Project Phase, and the City shall not terminate the Agreement or exercise its remedies under the Agreement as to such owner’s Project Phase as a result of any default under the Agreement or any related agreement caused by another Project Phase.

8. The Parties shall cause the Memorandum of Agreement (“Memorandum”), in the form attached as Attachment No. 4 to the Agreement, to be modified to reflect the approval of this Amendment, and thereafter executed and acknowledged by the City, Developer, Phase 1 Developer, Phase 2 Developer and delivered into the Phase 1 Escrow for recordation against the Site in the Official Records upon the Phase 1 Closing.
.
[Signatures follow on next 2 pages]

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 8
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City, Developer, Phase 1 Developer and Phase 2 Developer have executed this Amendment on the respective dates set forth below and effective as of the date executed by City.

Dated: ____________________
[“Effective Date”]
CITY:

CITY OF HEALDSBURG,
a California municipal corporation
By:

Jeffrey Kay, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Samantha Zutler, City Attorney
Dated: ____________________ DEVELOPER:

FREEBIRD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC,
a California limited liability company
By:

Robin Zimbler, Manager

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 9
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
Dated:__________ PHASE 1 DEVELOPER:

SAGGIO HILLS LOT 14, L.P.,
a California limited partnership
By: JHC-Saggio Hills Lot 14 LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its managing general partner
By: Jamboree Housing Corporation,
a California nonprofit public benefit
corporation, sole member/manager
By:_________________________
Michael Massie, Executive Vice
President and Chief Development
Officer
By: Freebird Saggio Hills Lot 14 LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its administrative general partner
By: Freebird Development Company,
LLC, a California limited liability
company, its sole member/manager

By:_________________________

Robin Zimbler, Manager

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905
-0208-1559 v6 10
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
Dated:__________ PHASE 2 DEVELOPER:

SAGGIO HILLS LOT 3, L.P.,
a California limited partnership
By:JHC-Saggio Hills Lot 3 LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its managing general partner
By: Jamboree Housing Corporation,
a California nonprofit public benefit
corporation, its sole member/manager
By:_________________________
Michael Massie, Executive
Vice President and Chief
Development Officer
By: Freebird Saggio Hills Lot 3 LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its administrative general partner
By: Freebird Development Company,
LLC, a California limited liability company, its
sole member/manager
By:_________________________
Robin Zimbler, Manager

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First 4905-0208-1559 v6 11
4908-5188-4340, v. 1
Attachment No. 16
Residual Receipts Promissory Note

6.D.d
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Healdsburg_Freebird_First Amendment_Disposition and Development Agreement (4824 : Saggio Hills Affordable Housing First

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
August 19, 2024

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
401 Grove Street, Healdsburg
.

CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor/Chairperson Hagele called to order the concurrent meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Successor Agency of the City of Healdsburg at 6:00 p.m. with the following Council Members present:

Present: Council Members/: Edwards, Herrod, Kelley, Mitchell and Mayor Hagele Board Members

Absent: Council Members/: None.

Board Members

APPROVAL OF AGENDA
On a motion by Councilmember Kelley, seconded by Councilmember Edwards, approved the August 19, 2024, City Council and Redevelopment Successor Agency meeting agenda as submitted. The motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. (Ayes 5, Noes 0, Absent – None)

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
None.

ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS – PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF JENNIFER “JENDALA” UTSCH TO THE HEALDSBURG

COMMUNITY
Mayor Hagele, with Council concurrence, issued a Proclamation recognizing the contributions of Jennifer “Jendala” Utsch to the Healdsburg community.

Ms. Utsch expressed gratitude to the City Council and City staff and reflected on 20 years living in the City of Healdsburg.

ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS – PROCLAMATION DECLARING AUGUST 26, 2024, AS WOMEN’S EQUALITY DAY IN THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG Mayor Hagele, with Council concurrence, issued a Proclamation declaring August 26, 2024 as Women’s Equality Day in the City of Healdsburg.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 2 ends

Gina Fortuna Dixon introduced Laura Arreguin, a representative on the Commission on the Status of Women and presented the ongoing issue of pay inequities faced by women today.

Councilmember Edwards expressed thanks for releasing the Status of Women report.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Kay reported about implicit bias training, announced the City has been awarded the Prohousing Designation and received $560,000 to assist with repairs at Victory Studios. City Manager Kay further noted the City is recommended for the Affordable Housing Sustainable Community Grant Program to fund Saggio Hills affordable housing project, announced business license renewals are available, and the unveiling of the Maria De Los Angeles mural at Harmon guest house is coming up.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND NON

AGENDA ITEMS
Merrilyn Joyce expressed concern about accessibility of sidewalks around town, lighting the basketball courts at Giorgi Park and inquired about public comment returning on Zoom.

CONSENT CALENDAR
On a motion by Councilmember Kelley, seconded by Councilmember Edwards, approved the Consent Calendar as follows:

A. CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE SONOMA COUNTY ABANDONED VEHICLE

ABATEMENT PROGRAM
Adopted Resolution No. 96-2024 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE SONOMA COUNTY VEHICLE ABATEMENT AUTHORITY.” (Ayes 5, Noes 0, Absent – None)
B. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY
Adopted Resolution No. 97-2024 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

A COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH THE SONOMA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.” (Ayes 5, Noes 0, Absent – None)

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 3 ends

C. UPDATED PUBLIC ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING USER FEES FOR CITYOWNED ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS Adopted Resolution No. 98-2024 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG UPDATING PUBLIC ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING

USER FEES FOR CITY-OWNED ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS THROUGH JUNE 30, 2027.” (Ayes 5, Noes 0, Absent – None) The motion to approve the Consent Calendar as above carried on a unanimous roll call vote. (Ayes 5, Noes 0, Absent – None)

PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

OLD BUSINESS – GROVE STREET NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN IMPLEMENTATION (COMPLETE STREETS) PROJECT DESIGN UPDATE
Councilmember Kelley recused herself from this item as she lives within 500 feet of the proposed project.

Public Works Director Zimmer introduced Project Manager Clay Thistle, and Robert Stevens, the CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Design Consultant, who would be presenting alongside him this evening.

Director Zimmer provided background information on the project’s purpose, the history of the project, the grant funding received for the Grove Street Neighborhood Project, the outreach events conducted on the project and the feedback received from the community. Additionally, Director Zimmer explained the different types of bike facilities, including Class III, Class II, Class IV, and Class I bike lanes.

Design Consultant Stevens provided information on the takeaways received from the outreach meetings, a detailed overview of existing conditions on Grove Street and the challenges associated with adding a bike lane or sidewalks along certain areas on Grove Street. Consultant Stevens discussed the difficulties of implementing Class II bike lanes, noted the recommendation is to move forward with Class III bike lanes, shared the design concept for the Foss Creek pathway crossing and addressed bicycle desire lines. Additionally, he discussed the on-street parking supply and noted the results of a parking study that was conducted.

Principal Engineer Thistle provided an overview of the current budget, funding, and project timeline.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 4 ends

Director Zimmer noted that the funding for undergrounding the electric utilities and street lighting would come from the Electric Department. Additionally he mentioned that since the grant application, there have been changes to Measure T funding, requiring the deferral of the pavement project to a later date.

In response to Councilmember inquiries, Director Zimmer provided information on the budget, how to adjust speed limits along Grove Street, painting the bike lanes green, noted that an advanced parking study would be needed to assess the usage of street parking and explained that the Class II bike lane would be a one-way lane. Engineer Thistle provided information on pavement repairs that would be conducted. Consultant Stevens provided information on the Foss Creek Pathway crossing and cut through. Director Zimmer further provided additional details on the biking pathways connecting Foss Creek Pathway, Grove Street, and Dry Creek, and clarified that the bike box is a designated green area allowing cyclists extra space at crosswalks. Engineer Thistle provided further details on project funding. City Manager Kay added that SB1 funds are allocated for road rehabilitation.

Public Comment
Walter Niederberger, representing the Healdsburg 2040 Club, expressed support for bike lanes on both sides of Grove Street, emphasized the importance of improving safety for all types of cyclists and expressed a preference for Option B and advocated for green-painted bike lanes throughout the entire route.

Emily Sheraton, Advocacy Coordinator with the Sonoma County Bike Coalition, raised concerns about the safety of Class III bike facilities and the impact of driving speed limits, explained why Class II bike lanes are safer for cyclists and urged the City to consider all routes for cyclists and ensure they cater to all types of riders.

Christine Webster, a member of the Active Transportation Plan Advisory Committee, expressed her support for painted green bike lanes on Grove Street, well-lit streets, expressed concerns about the lack of space for cyclists on Grove Street and expressed her support for extending bike paths up to Dry Creek Road.

Ed expressed his support for bike boulevards, raised concerns about individuals who rely on bikes as their primary mode of transportation, commented on the dangers of cycling with highspeed traffic and emphasized the need for speed reduction to be included in the plan.

Alice Oliver inquired about the impact of the plan on mailboxes.

Skip Brand expressed his support for green bike lanes and advocated for reduced speed limits.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 5 ends

Council Comments
Option B – Class 2 Bike Lanes Both Directions
Following a brief discussion, there was Council majority to move forward with Option B, Class 2 Bike Lanes in both Directions. Councilmember Edwards raised concerns about the loss of parking and noted that feedback from residents in the affected area had not been heard.

Class 2 Bike Facilities Painted Green
Following a brief discussion, there was Council consensus to move forward with painting the Class II bike facilities green.

Vice Mayor Mitchell thanked the staff for their hard work and is looking forward to the completion of the project.

Councilmember Herrod expressed appreciation for the thoroughness of the design and looked forward to the project's completion.

Councilmember Edwards suggested outreach to the residents of Citrine Apartments to inform them about the City’s decision to proceed with Option B.

Mayor Hagele concluded the discussion by noting that the Council will revisit speed limits in the future.

Councilmember Kelley returned to Council Chamber at this time.

OLD BUSINESS – ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION STRUCTURE
Community Services Director Themig provided background information on the Arts in Healdsburg, reviewed the goals of the Arts and Culture Master Plan, key considerations of forming and Arts and Culture Commission, the proposed framework and structure of the Arts and Culture Commission. Additionally, Director Themig reviewed the potential fiscal impact and a preliminary timeline to implement the Arts and Culture Commission.

In response to Council’s inquiries City Manager Kay noted at the end of each calendar year, the Council can appoint a liaison during board, commission, and committee appointments. Director Themig further clarified that any significant changes to the Arts and Culture Master Plan would require approval by the Council, noted that the commission's structure was developed in advance to ensure the process remains on track, and that the inclusion of a full-time student was modeled after the Parks and Recreation Commission. Additionally, Director Themig confirmed that an annual work plan is listed as part of the duties of the Commission.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 6 ends

Public Comment
Linus Lancaster urged the Council to include the Creative Leadership Team's proposed modifications to the Arts and Culture Program Administrator job description.

Mark McMullen, member of the Creative Leadership Team, highlighted the revisions to job description, suggested the Arts and Culture Masterplan be updated as needed and wants to see this plan integrated into citywide planning.

Gale Okumura Sullivan, executive director of Healdsburg jazz, supports the creation of the Arts and Culture Commission.

Council Comments
Councilmember Herrod expressed gratitude to the Creative Leadership Team for their thoughtful contributions and hard work, was supportive of having a broader pool of commissioners is beneficial and supports allowing two commissioners from outside the Healdsburg city limits but within the Healdsburg Unified School District boundary to serve on the Commission.

Councilmember Kelley expressed support for allowing two commissioners from outside city limits but within the Healdsburg Unified School District boundary, expressed support for the inclusion of a youth member, removing the requirement that the youth member must be a fulltime student and reflected on past arts and culture events and emphasized the importance of focusing on diverse events.

Councilmember Edwards expressed concerns about the timing of potential arts and culture projects moving forward on schedule, noting that the commission will need to stay aligned with City Council meetings and be mindful of project timelines.

Vice Mayor Mitchell echoes Councilmember Edwards’ concerns and acknowledged that the commission is evolving and that it will be an interactive process and expressed support for staff's framework.

Mayor Hagele expressed appreciation for staff's recommendations and the insightful public comments provided.

Council discussion ensued regarding the language surrounding the youth commissioner position and allowing two commissioners from outside the City limits but within the Healdsburg Unified School District boundary to serve on the Commission.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 7 ends

Director Themig concluded the discussion by stating that he would revise the language to allow for up to two commissioners from outside the City limits but within the Healdsburg Unified School District boundary to serve on the Commission, clarified that the language around the youth commissioner would be re-defined and that he would add language to the job description as recommended by the Creative Leadership Team.

NEW BUSINESS – DISCUSSION ON FORMULA BUSINESS REGULATIONS IN

DOWNTOWN HEALDSBURG
Planning and Building Director Duiven stated the item this evening was a discussion on Formula Business regulation in Downtown Healdsburg. Director Duiven provided the reason for including the item on the agenda, offered a brief overview of the staff report, clarified the definition of "Formula Business" as outlined in the General Plan and highlighted two key policies related to land use and economic development and outlined the implementation measures associated with these policies. Additionally, Director Duiven provided context on proposed amendments from 2011, noting that while the item was removed from the City Council agenda and never revisited, staff has continued to enforce the Planning Commission's amendments. He concluded his presentation by offering several alternatives for the Council to consider.

City Manager Kay provided additional information on the policy around Formula Businesses and noted the feedback staff is seeking from Council this evening.

Councilmember Kelley commented on why she asked for this item to be agendized for discussion, raised concerns about the current land use code, emphasized the importance of amending the land use code to better align with the community's needs and the need for the Council to establish a clear direction moving forward. Additionally, Councilmember Kelley expressed a desire to see the Planning Commission provide a formal recommendation to guide the Council's actions.

In response to Mayor Hagele’s inquiry, City Manager Kay clarified there is a general plan policy in place.

Councilmember Herrod noted that limiting formula retail businesses is largely a noncontroversial issue within the community, recommended that the Planning Commission provide a formal recommendation to guide the Council's actions, raised concerns about potential future challenges, such as vacant consumer businesses, the fulfillment of consumer needs by formula businesses, and the impact of economic downturns. Additionally, Councilmember Herrod expressed his support for a clearer definition of what constitutes formula retail.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 8 ends

Councilmember Edwards highlighted the need for a more in-depth discussion and acknowledged that many key concepts still need to be clearly defined.

Vice Mayor Mitchell echoed Councilmember Edwards' concerns, recognized the potential for unintended consequences and stressed that whatever decision is ultimately made must be intentional and well-considered.

Mayor Hagele reflected on the challenges of the recession, wildfires, and the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasized the importance of supporting local businesses, acknowledged the potential for these issues to evolve in cycles and expressed interest in hearing public comments and ideas on alternative definitions.

Public Comment
Holly Brand commented on the Land Use Code, proposed expanding the plaza retail space to surrounding areas, noted the focus of the ordinance should be on updating the Land Use Code and refining the definitions related to formula retail. Ms. Brand expressed support for allowing businesses that are currently lacking in town.

Erin Morris, owner of Fideaux, expressed her support for maintaining small, locally owned businesses in downtown Healdsburg and explained the importance of small businesses to the vitality of the community.

Erica Dawkins, a business owner, shared her experience growing up in Healdsburg, shopping at local businesses, and eventually becoming a business owner herself. Ms. Dawkins emphasized the importance of tourism in supporting local businesses and expressed opposition of formula retail businesses being located in the downtown.

Cathy Waterbury expressed her support for local businesses and reflected on past and present formula retail in town. She urged the Council to consider expanding the plaza district to prevent formula businesses from being in town.

Laney Rooks, an attorney in town, urged the Council to consider the impact on businesses like hers if local businesses were to disappear.

Ed commented on how special Healdsburg is, preserving what has been created and expressed a desire to protect local business owners.

Healdsburg Resident thanked the Council for listening to the community and urged Council to expand the downtown area to accommodate growth.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 9 ends

Skip Brand commented on big box businesses, vacancy rates in Healdsburg, noted diversity in business contributes to higher quality, thanked the Council for allowing the community to engage in this important discussion and was supportive of a moratorium on formula businesses.

Council Comments
Mayor Hagele recommended directing staff to refine the definition surrounding formula retail and emphasized the need for further discussions on the boundaries and exceptions related to formula retail. Additionally, Mayor Hagele expressed a desire to see the community feel more welcomed downtown.

Councilmember Herrod reviewed the staff alternatives and expressed support for directing staff to present policy options that would clarify the definition of formula businesses for the Council’s consideration.

Director Duiven suggested utilizing a process similar to the Cannabis Ordinance, noting that staff could continue research and develop a framework based on the feedback received tonight.

Councilmember Edwards commented on past small businesses successes and including feedback from the community on formula retail policy.

Vice Mayor Mitchell expressed her support for businesses in Healdsburg and slowing down the process to move this item forward because the amount of work this item would take and inquired what priorities would fall off staff’s plate if Council decided to move forward with this item.

Vice Mayor Mitchell was in favor of moving this item to goal setting.

Councilmember Herrod was supportive of moving this item to goal setting.

Councilmember Kelley expressed a desire to see staff move forward with formula retail, expanding the definition of formula retail and looking at what zoning districts should be included.

Following a Council discussion, there was a Council majority to direct staff to bring back policy options for formula business regulations in Downtown Healdsburg before goal setting in 2025.

COUNCIL REPORTS ON MATTERS OF INTEREST OCCURRING SINCE PREVIOUS

REGULAR MEETING/EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT REPORTS
Councilmember Edwards reported that he attended the implicit bias training, senior brunch at the Senior Center, and the Healdsburg Museum display on Fitch Mountain.

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
August 19, 2024

Page 10 ends

Vice Mayor Mitchell reported that she attended implicit bias training, the Sonoma County Alliance meeting, Sonoma County Mayors and Councilmembers dinner, the ribbon cutting celebrating 100 years at the Garrett’s Ace Hardware and the Sunrise Rotary breakfast.

Councilmember Herrod reported that he attended the Corazón fundraiser, Chamber of Commerce board meeting and noted that it was back to school week in the City.

Councilmember Kelley reported she attended a fundraiser for Project Zin, the SCTA subcommittee meeting and met with business owners to discuss formula retail.

Mayor Hagele reported that he met with Senator Padilla, gave him a tour of the solar floating project, drove him around town and showed him the street projects and recycled water pipeline.

Mayor Hagele further reported he met with City Manager Kay to discuss funding for these projects, attended National Night Out, the implicit bias training, and the Rotary Sunrise breakfast.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:41 p.m.

APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ __________________________________ David Hagele, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.E.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: August 19, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
September 3, 2024

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
401 Grove Street, Healdsburg
.

CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Mayor/Chairperson Hagele called to order the concurrent meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Successor Agency of the City of Healdsburg at 6:00 p.m. with the following Council Members present:

Present: Council Members/: Edwards, Herrod, Kelley and Mayor Hagele Board Members

Absent: Council Members/: Vice Mayor Mitchell
Board Members

APPROVAL OF AGENDA
On a motion by Councilmember Kelley, seconded by Councilmember Herrod, approved the September 3, 2024, City Council and Redevelopment Successor Agency meeting agenda. The motion carried on a voice vote with Vice Mayor Mitchell noted as absent. (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell)

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
None.

ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS – RECOGNITION OF CITY EMPLOYEES

WITH MILESTONE ANNIVERSARIES
Chief Boaz honored Fire Engineer Brian Crabb for 10 years of dedicated service with the City and reflected on his contributions to the City.

Fire Engineer Crabb thanked the Council for the recognition.

ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS – A PROCLAMATION HONORING JIM

WALTERS
Mayor Hagele, with Council concurrence, issued a Proclamation honoring Jim Walters for his dedication to the community of Healdsburg.

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2024

Page 2 ends

Mr. Walters thanked the Council for the recognition.

ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS – A PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 2024 AS NATIONAL SERVICE DOG MONTH
Mayor Hagele, with Council concurrence, issued a Proclamation declaring the month of September 2024 as National Service Dog month in the City of Healdsburg.

Ben Vieth, Utility Compliance and Safety Coordinator, shared his experiences serving in the US Air Force, his struggles with PTSD, and the transformative support he received from K9 Companions, along with the assistance of his service dog, Mateo.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Kay reported about the mini library opening at the Community Center, the upcoming YWCA ribbon cutting, the Foss Creek Clean Up, and Neighborhood Night Out. He noted that City Attorney Zutler is participating remotely.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND NON

AGENDA ITEMS
Ray Holley Sonoma County Library PIO, commented on the mini library opening of the Sonoma County Mini Library and gave praise to Jim Walters and his significant contributions to the City of Healdsburg.

Callum Weeks commented on Proposition 5, and urged the community to vote "yes" in support of it on the upcoming ballot in November and provided information about AB 1033, which went into effect this year.

Brigette Mansell expressed her opposition towards Measure O on the November 2024 ballot and expressed concerns about the ballot measure language and transparency with the public.

Mark Horne commented on formula business policies in the City of Healdsburg, expressed concerns about the City’s oversight of who leases property on the plaza and the absence of a clear ordinance regarding formula business and expressed dissent that there is no urgency in advancing the ordinance.

Holly Brand commented on the formula retail decision from two weeks ago and encouraged the Council to reconsider the urgency of formula retail and defining the downtown area.

Mark McMullen, on behalf of the Creative Leadership Team, thanked the Council for advancing the Arts and Culture Commission.

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2024

Page 3 ends

Moreta Wimmer echoed Ms. Brand’s concerns and expressed her dissatisfaction with the Council’s response regarding formula businesses.

Genevieve Gago wants the formula retail ordinance to be completed and emphasized the importance of preserving small-town charm and supporting local businesses.

Sandy Erickson reflected on her decision to move her business from San Francisco to Healdsburg and recalled a past City Council decision to prioritize tourism. Ms. Erickson expressed her support for expanding the downtown area as it relates to formula retail.

Bjorn Wimmer commented on formula businesses, expressed concerns about the potential influx of such businesses in town and encouraged Council to address formula businesses in Healdsburg.

CONSENT CALENDAR
On a motion by Councilmember Kelley, seconded by Councilmember Herrod, approved the Consent Calendar as follows:

A. RECEIVE THE MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR JULY 2024
By motion, received and approved the Monthly Investment Report for July 2024. (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent - Mitchell)
B. APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENT REPORT FOR WITHDRAWALS DURING THE MONTH OF JULY 2024
By motion, approved the Disbursement Report for July 2024. (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent - Mitchell)
C. ACCEPT A RECYCLED WATER PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS APN 088-150-035 AND APN 088-150-037
Adopted Resolution No. 99-2024 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG ACCEPTING A DEDICATION OF A RECYCLED WATER PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT FROM OAK MOUND CEMETERY, INC., AT A PORTION OF APN 088-150-035 AND APN 088-150-037.” (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell)
D. AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RRM

DESIGN GROUP

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2024

Page 4 ends

Adopted Resolution No. 100-2024 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RRM DESIGN GROUP FOR

ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AND TESTING SERVICES FOR THE

NORTH VILLAGE FIRE SUBSTATION PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT AND INCREASING THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT TO $433,540.” (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell) E. READING OF ORDINANCE TITLES
By motion, determined that the titles to all ordinances that appear on this public agenda have been read and waived further reading. (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell) F. CREATION OF AN ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION
By motion, introduce for first reading by title only, waiving further reading of the text, "AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG AMENDING CHAPTER 2.32 OF TITLE 2 OF THE HEALDSBURG MUNICIPAL CODE (BOARDS,

COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS) TO ADD AN ARTS AND CULTURE
COMMISSION.” (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell)
G. BIENNIAL REVISIONS TO LOCAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE Adopted Resolution No. 101-2024 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 141-2022 AND ADOPTING A REVISED LOCAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE.” (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell)
H. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN OF AQUIFER

STORAGE AND RECOVERY WELLS
Adopted Resolution No. 102-2024 titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GEI CONSULTANTS INC. TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING

SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY (ASR)

EXPLORATORY WELLS, AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,055,600, APPROVE CHANGE

ORDERS UP TO TEN PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT AND AMENDING THE ADOPTED FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET.” (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell)

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2024

Page 5 ends

The motion to approve the Consent Calendar as above carried on a roll call vote with Vice Mayor Mitchell noted as absent. (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent – Mitchell)

PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

OLD BUSINESS
None.

NEW BUSINESS – DISCUSSION OF FUTURE PLANNING EFFORTS TO SUPPORT

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN TARGETED AREAS
Planning and Building Director Duiven provided information on previous planning efforts aimed at supporting residential development, noted the planning tools that would be covered in the presentation, including the housing overlay zone, specific plan, and general plan. Director Duiven further provided an in-depth explanation of an Housing Overlay Zone, covering its definition, potential features, benefits, and its application to the North Healdsburg Avenue Corridor and outlined the proposed timeline and associated costs.

In response to Councilmember Kelley’s inquiry, Director Duiven clarified additional studies could be within the $200,000 cost range and noted CEQA analysis would assist with knowing which additional studies would be needed.

Director Duiven further reviewed detailed information on a Specific Plan, covering its definition, key components, benefits, and its application to the Central Healdsburg Avenue Plan and South Entry Area and outlined the proposed timeline and costs. Additionally, Director Duiven provided an overview of the General Plan, including its definition, elements, benefits, and potential applications. Director Duiven noted that staff does not consider updating the General Plan to be a timely or cost-effective approach at this time.

Director Duiven summarized the recommended planning tools, which include adding a Housing Overlay Zone to North Healdsburg Avenue, amending the Specific Plan for the Central Healdsburg Avenue Plan, and creating a new Specific Plan for the South Entry Area and noted starting with the Housing Overlay Zone for North Healdsburg Avenue first.

City Manager Kay clarified that this presentation is for informational purposes only, noted staff is seeking feedback from the Council and there are insufficient resources to update the General Plan at this time.

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2024

Page 6 ends

In response to Council’s inquiries, Director Duiven provided insights into a potential community engagement process, clarified that no density changes are being proposed with Measure O and noted that in addition to the City identifying properties for higher density under the housing overlay, residents would have the opportunity to propose properties for consideration.

Additionally, Director Duiven noted the South Entry Area requires the addition of water, sewer and electric utilities before any construction can occur and elaborated on the process that would need to happen including funding for a South Entry Area Plan, funding to get utilities to the South Entry Area before any housing can be built and the length of time all of that may take.

Director Duiven further provided information on Housing Overlay Zones, how they could be applied to various zones, emphasized that the overlay is specifically designed to address residential housing needs, not commercial development. Director Duiven further reviewed incentives available to Developers, clarified that the housing capacity study recommends density levels that can be supported while preserving the character of Healdsburg and noted that there is room for flexibility in densities with the Housing Overlay.

Public Comment
Brigette Mansell expressed a desire to see more affordable-by-design housing in Healdsburg, acknowledged the importance of having a clear plan, and commented that people won’t support Measure O without one and voiced concerns about the City moving too quickly in its efforts.

Calum Weeks commented on the importance of community engagement in this process, suggested considering an increase in minimum density requirements to address the need for "missing middle" housing and advocated for a focus on developer incentives.

Mark Horne expressed interest in MTC's transient community standards, stressing that the City should act on this opportunity and noted that prioritizing the CHAP amendment first could help secure that funding.

Jonathan Pearlman acknowledged that this discussion encourages developers to focus on middleclass housing, urged Council to consider the next generation in planning for the future, clarified that the focus should be on middle-class housing, not affordable housing, and encouraged greater resident participation in the process.

Merrilyn Joyce expressed concerns about the South Entry Area potentially taking away valuable manufacturing land, farming space, and wetlands if residential development were to occur, suggested exploring modular homes and the possibility of subdividing existing residential lots and stressed the need for a solid plan to ensure Measure O passes.

Hank Skewis commented on the PowerPoint slides, noted that transit was not included, commented on the importance of addressing how residents will get around, voiced concerns

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2024

Page 7 ends

about Measure O and expressed a desire to see the focus be on mixed housing, as middle-income housing might not meet the needs of all residents.

Council Comments
Councilmember Kelley was supportive of moving forward with the Housing Overlay Zone in the north part of Healdsburg and as funding from MTC’s priority development areas becomes available, utilizing those funds to support planning efforts around the future smart station area.

Councilmember Herrod emphasized the urgency of advancing planning efforts to meet housing goals, recognized the ongoing work to provide deed-restricted housing for low-income residents and highlighted the need for “missing middle” housing to address gaps in the market.

Councilmember Edwards expressed concerns about access to affordable housing for Senior Residents, acknowledged that middle-income housing will continue to evolve, noted the importance of considering this in future planning and commented on how wealth is built.

Mayor Hagele expressed appreciation for the public’s comments and concerns, as well as appreciation for the hard work of staff and the Council in advancing housing initiatives. Mayor Hagele expressed support for the Housing Overlay Zone and expressed excitement about the upcoming connectivity improvements.

Councilmember Kelley reflected on the area around the future SMART station and OBAG funding and provided information on how we get future projects funded. Councilmember Kelley expressed a desire to see updates to the Central Healdsburg Avenue Plan in place in order to apply for additional funds through OBAG and the importance of ensuring the City is wellpositioned to pursue future funding opportunities.

NEW BUSINESS – ESTABLISH MUNICIPAL RECYCLED WATER RATES Utilities Engineering Manager Fuss stated the action this evening was to establish municipal recycled water fees, provided background information on the recycled water program, and the estimated operational and capital replacement costs to operate the recycled water program.

Manager Fuss further reviewed the municipal recycled water fee, annual adjustments and provided information about the fiscal impacts and the benefits of the recycled water program.

In response to Council’s inquiries, Manager Fuss provided information on what facilities would be utilizing the recycled water, explained that there are two bulk fill stations available, and contractors have the option to rent a meter and cover the associated water fees. Additionally, Manager Fuss confirmed that the volume of water used for construction purposes is not factored in the calculations.

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025) City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2024

Page 8 ends

There were no public comments on this item.

On a motion by Councilmember Edwards, seconded by Councilmember Herrod, adopted Resolution No. 103-2024, titled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF HEALDSBURG ESTABLISHING METER AND VOLUMETRIC USAGE FEES FOR MUNICIPAL RECYCLED WATER USERS.” The motion carried on a roll call vote with Vice Mayor Mitchell noted as absent. (Ayes 4, Noes 0, Absent - Mitchell)

COUNCIL REPORTS ON MATTERS OF INTEREST OCCURRING SINCE PREVIOUS

REGULAR MEETING/EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT REPORTS
Councilmember Edwards reported he attended the Senior Citizen Advisory Commission meeting and Chamber of Commerce BBQ.

Councilmember Herrod reported he attended the mini library opening and Labor Day event.

Councilmember Kelley reported she went to see Maria De Los Angeles’s mural at Harmon Guest House.

Mayor Hagele reported he attended the Chamber of Commerce BBQ, Maria De Los Angeles’s mural unveiling, the final Tuesday on the Plaza event and Healdsburg’s World Gym lifting competition.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:53 p.m.

APPROVED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ __________________________________ David Hagele, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.E.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: September 3, 2024 Regular Meeting Minutes (4828 : Approval of Minutes - April 21, 2025)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: To Start at a Time Certain of 6:30 p.m. - Public Hearing to Receive community input and consider introduction of an Ordinance Amending Healdsburg Municipal Code Article 1 (General Provisions) within Chapter

2.40 (Elections) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to add section

2.40.010.01 “District Elections” to Provide for the Election of Members of the City Council by Five Districts; Establish the District Boundaries; and Election Order of Each District
PREPARED BY: Raina Allan, City Clerk
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Conduct a sixth public hearing to receive community input regarding the proposed final map, Draft Map D, and any other published draft maps and sequence of elections for district-based council elections; and

2. Select the final map to be included in proposed ordinance; and

3. Select the two District Seats to be up for election in 2026 (with the remaining District seats to be up for election in 2028) to be included in the proposed ordinance; and

4. Consider introducing by title only and waive further reading of an Ordinance Amending Healdsburg Municipal Code Article 1 (General Provisions) within Chapter 2.40 (Elections) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to add section 2.40.010.01 “District Elections” to Provide for the Election of Members of the City Council by Five Districts; Establish the District Boundaries; and Election Order of Each District.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

Outreach for this effort includes posting on social media channels, including Facebook, Instagram and Nextdoor. The City has also shared information on the City’s website and in the bi-weekly City Manager’s Update. Informational pamphlets have been distributed to each City facility in English and Spanish as well as an insert that was included in the December utility

7.A
Packet Pg. 118
bills. A dedicated webpage has been created on the City’s website at https://healdsburg.gov/1152/Transition-to-District-Elections. Information is available to the public with background information about the districting process, upcoming hearing dates, and supporting documents. This webpage is being continuously updated with dates and locations where community members can share their feedback on this issue. The website also features a virtual mapping tool which community members have been utilizing to draw their own district boundaries and a feature allowing submission of community interest forms. Information will be provided in both English and Spanish. The City held a community meeting on January 16, 2025 at the Community Center, met with the senior community on January 24, 2025 at the Senior Center and the City Manager held a meeting with the Spanish-speaking community on January 28, 2025 to gather feedback on the process. The City has partnered with Corazón Healdsburg to assist with the outreach to the Spanish-speaking community. Both public hearings and community meetings will continue to include live interpretation services.

BACKGROUND:

On October 3, 2024, the City received a letter from a potential plaintiffs’ attorney, Shenkman & Hughes PC, alleging a violation of the CVRA and threatening litigation unless the City voluntarily transitions to a district-based election system for electing Councilmembers. On November 18, 2024, the City Council adopted a resolution declaring the intent to transition to District-Based elections. Elections Code section 10010(e)(3)(B) and (C) provides that if a legislative body adopts a resolution of intent, a prospective plaintiff may not commence an action within ninety (90) days of the resolution of intention’s passage unless that date is extended in writing by the parties. In this case, the prospective plaintiff’s attorney agreed to allow the City of Healdsburg a sixty (60) day extension and the initial Tentative Timeline submitted to the Council identified April 17, 2025 as the deadline for the transition. Since then, Staff confirmed with the prospective plaintiff’s attorney that an additional thirty (30) day extension is acceptable and thus the new deadline to complete the transition to district based elections is by May 17, 2025.

The City conducted the initial two public hearings on December 16, 2024 and January 6, 2025.

At the first and second public hearings, the Council received a report from the City’s demographer, Redistricting Partners, about the basics of the districting process and identifying communities of interest. The video and presentation from the first and second meeting can be found on the City’s dedicated redistricting webpage which can be found here:
https://healdsburg.gov/1152/Transition-to-District-Elections.

Upon completion of the first and second public hearings, the City was required to hold at least two additional hearings over a period of no more than 45 days, at which the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps and the proposed sequence of elections.

The City held the third public hearing on February 18th at which both the public and the City Council provided feedback on the draft maps. Members of the public had the opportunity to submit maps with four, five or six districts over the course of the last ten weeks.

At the fourth public hearing on March 17, 2025, the community and the City Council considered the draft maps moved forward from the third public hearing, as well as the community-submitted

7.A
Packet Pg. 119
maps. All of the maps are available on the City’s website:
https://healdsburg.gov/1152/Transition-to-District-Elections. The maps that have been submitted by members of the public through the City’s “Districtr” mapping tool are identified by a numerical identification number (e.g., ID 277459),” and the maps that have been prepared by Redistricting Partners are identified by a letter (e.g., Draft Map A).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

On April 7, 2025, the City Council held a fifth public hearing where they considered Draft Map A as the basis for an ordinance. Following discussion, the Council elected not to approve Draft Map A and instead selected Draft Map D as the foundation for the ordinance.

A summary of Draft Map D moved forward at the April 7th public hearing is provided below:
• Maximum Population Deviation Between Districts: 6.3%
• Based on public map ID 278352
o City Council and demographer edited map in public meeting #3 (2.18.25) • Map meets all FAIR MAPS Act requirements
o Balanced Population
o Contiguous
o Maintain Communities of Interest
o Follows main roads and man-made boundaries, such as the railroad tracks o Compact
• Communities discussed and maintained:
o Cohesive along the river community in the south of the City o Matheson Street Historic District remains together
o Similar community north of South Fitch Mountain Road kept together ▪ Older homes with larger lots
▪ Higher risk of fire
o District 1 maintains similar communities
▪ Renters/apartment complexes
▪ East of railroad tracks
▪ Establishes an influence district for Latino voters
o March Avenue and Fitch Mountain Villas neighborhoods remain together Within 21 days of adopting final election district boundaries, the City Council will be required to issue a report that explains the basis on which it made its decisions in achieving compliance with the requirements and criteria of the Fair Maps Act, including, as to each neighborhood, community of interest, city, or census designated place that was split into two or more districts, the reason for that split.

Redistricting Partners has prepared a FAIR MAPS Act Assessment (“Assessment”) of the maps submitted by members of the public. This Assessment analyzed all of the ranked list of criteria pursuant to the FAIR MAPS Act in the order required (i.e., population size deviation is under 10%, contiguous, maintains “communities of interest”, easily identifiable and understandable lines, compact, etc.). However, as indicated in the Assessment, Redistricting Partners can assess all criteria objectively except for “maintaining communities of interest”. That particular criterion

7.A
Packet Pg. 120
is subjective by definition and should be discussed by the City Council and public at this meeting to determine how well the draft maps fulfil this criterion.

Between the fifth and sixth public hearings, the City received zero additional maps.

At this sixth public hearing, the public may provide input regarding the published maps for consideration.

Proposed Ordinance
If the Council elects to finalize the selection of a map at April 21st meeting, does not make any further revisions to the selected map, or selects a new map entirely, the City Council can then proceed with selecting the two district seats that will be up for election in 2026 and the three district seats that will be up for election in 2028. Once the map and the sequencing are selected, the Council can proceed with the introduction of the proposed Ordinance.

The proposed Ordinance would amend Article 1 (General Provisions) within Chapter 2.40 (Elections) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to add a new section 2.40.010.01 “District Elections” within the Municipal Code. The proposed Ordinance would provide for the election of Councilmembers by establishing five districts and identify the district boundaries by including the map selected by the Council in the ordinance. The proposed Ordinance would also specify that the commencement of the district elections shall be in the next general municipal election in 2026 and provide for two seats being elected in 2026 and three seats in 2028 to ensure all incoming and currently seated Councilmembers’ do not have shortened terms. Finally, the Proposed Ordinance authorizes Redistricting Partners to make non-substantive, technical adjustments to the map as necessary to prepare a GIS shapefile, which will be submitted to the County of Sonoma by the City Clerk.

Sequence of Elections
The initial proposed sequencing for draft maps is even-numbered districts in 2026 and odd districts in 2028. To align the election cycles staff is proposing to renumber the districts. (Attached as “Draft D Staff Recommended Sequencing”) Under the proposed renumbering, Districts 2 and 4 would transition to District Elections in 2026 and 1, 3 and 5 in 2028.

Request for Direction and Next Steps
At the April 21, 2025 public hearing, Council will be considering Draft Map D, the introduction of an ordinance, the sequence of elections as well as any community-submitted maps that the City Council wishes to review.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council could choose not to move adopting Draft Map D. If this alternative is selected, staff requests further direction in terms of additional analysis requested or an alternative map to include in an ordinance for consideration at a future public hearing (most likely on May 5).

7.A
Packet Pg. 121
Staff confirmed with the prospective plaintiff’s attorney that an additional thirty (30) day extension is acceptable but the City would need to adopt the ordinance by May 17, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is a fiscal impact due to the costs associated with the transition to District-based elections.

Costs include the demographer, which are estimated to be less than $50,000, legal costs, and payment of the plaintiffs’ attorney costs of $30,000. The City Council appropriated a total of $100,000 for this effort at a prior meeting
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This item does not constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq.) (CEQA) as the adoption of the resolution does not have the potential to result in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15378).

ATTACHMENT(S):

Ordinance Adopting District Map and Sequencing
Healdsburg Draft D
Draft D Renumbered
Tentative Timeline Re Implementing District Based Elections FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25
Public Comment

7.A
Packet Pg. 122
4911-2648-5292 v2

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG AMENDING HEALDSBURG MUNICIPAL
CODE ARTICLE 1 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) WITHIN
CHAPTER 2.40 (ELECTIONS) OF TITLE 2
(ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) TO ADD SECTION

2.40.010.01 “DISTRICT ELECTIONS” TO PROVIDE FOR THE

ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL BY FIVE
DISTRICTS; ESTABLISH THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES; AND

ELECTION ORDER OF EACH DISTRICT
WHEREAS, members of the City Council are currently elected in “at-large” elections, in which each City Councilmember is elected by the registered voters of the entire City; and WHEREAS, California Government Code section 34886, in certain circumstances, authorizes the legislative body of a city of any population to adopt an ordinance to change its method of election from an “at-large” system to a “district-based” system in which each councilmember is elected only by the voters in the district in which the candidate resides; and WHEREAS, on October 3, 2024, the City of Healdsburg (“City”) received a certified letter from a potential plaintiffs’ attorney, alleging a violation of the California Voting Rights Act (the “CVRA”) and threatening litigation if the City declines to voluntarily change to a district-based election system for electing Councilmembers; and
WHEREAS, while the City Council denies that the City’s at large election system violates the CVRA or any other provision of law, the City Council determined that the public interest is better served by initiating a process for transition to a district-based election system and thereby avoiding the high costs associated with defending a lawsuit under the CVRA; and WHEREAS, California Government Code section 34886 permits the City Council of any city to change the City’s method of election by ordinance to a “by-district” system in which each member of the City Council is elected only by the voters in the district in which the candidate resides; and
WHEREAS, Elections Code Section 10010 provides a method whereby a jurisdiction can expeditiously transition to a district-based election system and thereby avoid the high cost of litigation under the CVRA if the jurisdiction complied with the “safe harbor” provisions of Elections Code Section 10010; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of California Elections Code section 10010(a)(1), a city that changes from an at-large city council method of election to a by-district city council method of election is required to hold at least two public hearings over a period of not more than 30 days,

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Ordinance Adopting District Map and Sequencing (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) Ordinance No.

Page 2 ends

at which the public is invited to provide input regarding communities of interest that would help to define the composition of the districts; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of California Elections Code section 10010(a)(2), a city that changes from an at-large election system to by district must, after the first and second public hearings hold at least two additional hearings over a period of no more than 45 days, at which the public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps and the proposed sequence of elections. A fifth public hearing would be held to adopt the selected map; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of California Elections Code section 10010(e)(3)(C), a city may enter into an agreement with a prospective plaintiff to extend the time periods to transition; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on November 18, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 134-2024 to begin the process of transitioning to a district-based election system and adopting the timeline for public hearings to conform to the requirements of California Elections Code section 10010; and
WHEREAS, the City did enter into a written agreement to extend the time period by which the City could transition to district based elections by an additional sixty days; and WHEREAS, at regular meetings held on December 16, 2024 and January 6, 2025, pursuant to California Elections Code section 10010(a)(1), the City Council held public hearings where the public was invited to provide input regarding the number and composition of the City’s voting districts and election sequencing, before any draft maps were drawn, and the City Council considered public input and discussed the same at those meetings; and WHEREAS, thereafter, at regular meetings on February 18, 2025 and March 17, 2025, pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010(a)(2), the City Council held public hearings where the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps that had been released at least seven (7) days before each meeting, and the proposed sequence of elections, and the City Council received, considered and discussed the same; and WHEREAS, at the regular meeting on April 7, 2025, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council formally selected the voting districts identified in “DRAFT MAP D”, attached to and incorporated herein as Exhibit A to this Ordinance (referred to hereafter as “Map D”), and an election sequence described herein, and introduced this Ordinance for a first reading at that time with a second reading and adoption scheduled to take place on April 21, 2025, and WHEREAS, throughout the foregoing process, the City engaged in a significant amount of public outreach and engagement above and beyond the public procedures required by California Elections Code Section 10010 and those portions of the Fair and Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities and Political Subdivisions (Fair Maps) Act applicable to cities that are transitioning for the first time to district-based elections systems; and

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Ordinance Adopting District Map and Sequencing (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) Ordinance No.

Page 3 ends

WHEREAS, such outreach included but is not limited to, maintaining a City website dedicated to the process of transitioning from at-large elections to by district elections, regularly notifying residents of meetings and other engagements on the City’s social media channels, posting and publishing notices about the public; distribution of informational pamphlets at each City facility in English and Spanish as well as an insert that was included in the December utility bills; and
WHEREAS, the City held a community meeting on January 16, 2025 at the Community Center, met with the senior community on January 24, 2025 at the Senior Center and the City Manager held a meeting with the Spanish-speaking community on January 28, 2025 to gather feedback on the process; and
WHEREAS, the City has partnered with Corazón Healdsburg to assist with the outreach to the Spanish-speaking community conducting public hearings and community meetings with live interpretation services; and
WHEREAS, in selecting the map, the City Council considered the criteria set forth in Elections Code Section 21130 of the Fair Maps Act and is adopting district boundaries in accordance with the provisions stated therein, as well as the federal Voting Rights Act and the California Voting Rights Act; and
WHEREAS, Map D meets all the requirements of state and federal law and was posted on November 8, 2024 on the City’s website for public consideration at least seven (7) days before the introduction of this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to enact, pursuant to California Government Code section 34886, an ordinance providing for the election of members of the City Council of the City of Healdsburg by district in five single-member districts as reflected in Exhibit A to this Ordinance and to implement the guarantees of the California Constitution.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and accurate and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Determination. Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from environmental review as the adoption of this Ordinance does not qualify as a “project” pursuant to Public Resource Code section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15320, 15378 and 15061(b)(3) since it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of the Ordinance would cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Ordinance Adopting District Map and Sequencing (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) Ordinance No.

Page 4 ends

Section 3. Code Amendment. Article 1 (General Provisions) within Chapter 2.40 (Elections) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) is hereby amended to add section 2.40.010.01 “District Elections,” within Article 1 to read as follows:
“Section 2.40.010.01- District Elections.

A. Declaration of Purpose. The City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby declares that the change of method of electing members of this Council, hereby enacted, is being made in furtherance of the California Voting Rights Act.

B. City Council Districts Established. Five City Council districts are hereby established in the City of Healdsburg. The district boundaries and identifying number of each district shall be as described on the Council District Map D, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated hereby by this reference and incorporated below. [SELECTED MAP]
C. Election of Members of the City Council by District.

1. Following the effective date of this ordinance and upon the commencement of “by district” elections pursuant to section 2.40.010.01(D), members of the City Council shall be elected “by district,” as defined in California Government Code Section 34871, or any successor statute.

2. Registered voters signing nomination papers or voting for a member of the City Council shall be residents of the geographical area making up the district from which the member is to be elected.

3. No term of any member of the City Council that commenced prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be affected by the adoption of this ordinance.

D. Commencement of District Elections. Commencing with the general municipal election in November of 2026 and every four years thereafter the voters in districts [ 2 ] and [ 4 ] shall elect members of the City Council by district for full four (4) year terms. At the general municipal election in 2028 and every four years thereafter, the voters in districts [ 1 ], [ 3 ], and [ 5] shall elect members of the City Council by district for full four (4) year terms.” Section 4. Authorization for Technical Adjustments. The City’s demographer, Redistricting Partners, is hereby authorized to make non-substantive technical adjustments to Map D to finalize the Map as necessary and to prepare a GIS shapefile which identifies the Council district boundaries, as well as the census blocks and tracts. The final Map D, the census blocks and tracts and the GIS shapefile shall be in a form approved by the City Clerk and City Attorney.

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Ordinance Adopting District Map and Sequencing (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) Ordinance No.

Page 5 ends

Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 6. Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption as provided by Government Code section 36937.

Section 7. Publication; Certification.

The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in accordance with State law. The City Clerk is also authorized and directed to file this Ordinance, Map D, the census blocks and tracts, the GIS shapefile, and any other documents necessary to effectuate the adoption of Map D with the Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-AssessorRegistrar of Voters. In the case of any parcels that are split across Council district boundaries, the Sonoma County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor-Registrar of Voters shall apply a uniform methodology to adjust the boundary line to a border of the parcel without materially affecting the population within each affected district.

INTRODUCED by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg on the 21st day of April, 2025, and PASSED and APPROVED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____ day of ____, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
___________________________________ ____________________________________ Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk
Dated: ______________________________

7.A.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Ordinance Adopting District Map and Sequencing (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Healdsburg Draft D (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D
12345
Population 2,342 2,200 2,340 2,263 2,215
Deviation 70 -72 68 -9 -57
Deviation % 3.1% -3.2% 3.0% -0.4% -2.5%
Other 980 1,616 1,682 1,437 1,494
Other % 41.8% 73.5% 71.9% 63.5% 67.4%
Latino 1,319 542 611 797 665
Latino % 56.3% 24.6% 26.1% 35.2% 30.0%
Asian 32 27 38 24 43
Asian % 1.4% 1.2% 1.6% 1.1% 1.9%
Black 11 1595 13
Black % 0.5% 0.7% 0.4% 0.2% 0.6%
2020 Census
12345
Total CVAP 1,727 2,174 1,857 1,655 1,345
Other CVAP 1,162 1,774 1,553 1,379 1,034
Other CVAP % 67.3% 81.6% 83.6% 83.3% 76.9%
Latino CVAP 511 350 296 262 248
Latino CVAP % 29.6% 16.1% 15.9% 15.8% 18.4%
Asian CVAP 54 497 14 63
Asian CVAP % 3.1% 2.3% 0.4% 0.8% 4.7%
Black CVAP01100
Black CVAP % 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP)

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Healdsburg Draft D (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D
District 1
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,342 70 3.1% 980 41.8% 1,319 56.3% 32 1.4% 11 0.5%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,727 1,162 67.3% 511 29.6% 54 3.1% 0 0.0%

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Healdsburg Draft D (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D
District 2
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,200 -72 -3.2% 1,616 73.5% 542 24.6% 27 1.2% 15 0.7%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 2,174 1,774 81.6% 350 16.1% 49 2.3% 1 0.0%

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Healdsburg Draft D (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D
District 3
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,340 68 3.0% 1,682 71.9% 611 26.1% 38 1.6% 9 0.4%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,857 1,553 83.6% 296 15.9% 7 0.4% 1 0.1%

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Healdsburg Draft D (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D
District 4
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,263 -9 -0.4% 1,437 63.5% 797 35.2% 24 1.1% 5 0.2%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,655 1,379 83.3% 262 15.8% 14 0.8% 0 0.0%

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Healdsburg Draft D (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D
District 5
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,215 -57 -2.5% 1,494 67.4% 665 30.0% 43 1.9% 13 0.6%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,345 1,034 76.9% 248 18.4% 63 4.7% 0 0.0%

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Healdsburg Draft D (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D (renumbered)

7.A.c
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Draft D Renumbered (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D (renumbered)
12345
Population 2,342 2,340 2,200 2,263 2,215
Deviation 70 68 -72 -9 -57
Deviation % 3.1% 3.0% -3.2% -0.4% -2.5%
Other 980 1,682 1,616 1,437 1,494
Other % 41.8% 71.9% 73.5% 63.5% 67.4%
Latino 1,319 611 542 797 665
Latino % 56.3% 26.1% 24.6% 35.2% 30.0%
Asian 32 38 27 24 43
Asian % 1.4% 1.6% 1.2% 1.1% 1.9%
Black 119 155 13
Black % 0.5% 0.4% 0.7% 0.2% 0.6%
2020 Census
12345
Total CVAP 1,727 1,857 2,174 1,655 1,345
Other CVAP 1,162 1,553 1,774 1,379 1,034
Other CVAP % 67.3% 83.6% 81.6% 83.3% 76.9%
Latino CVAP 511 296 350 262 248
Latino CVAP % 29.6% 15.9% 16.1% 15.8% 18.4%
Asian CVAP 547 49 14 63
Asian CVAP % 3.1% 0.4% 2.3% 0.8% 4.7%
Black CVAP01100
Black CVAP % 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP)

7.A.c
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Draft D Renumbered (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D (renumbered)
District 1
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,342 70 3.1% 980 41.8% 1,319 56.3% 32 1.4% 11 0.5%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,727 1,162 67.3% 511 29.6% 54 3.1% 0 0.0%

7.A.c
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Draft D Renumbered (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D (renumbered)
District 2
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,340 68 3.0% 1,682 71.9% 611 26.1% 38 1.6% 9 0.4%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,857 1,553 83.6% 296 15.9% 7 0.4% 1 0.1%

7.A.c
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Draft D Renumbered (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D (renumbered)
District 3
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,200 -72 -3.2% 1,616 73.5% 542 24.6% 27 1.2% 15 0.7%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 2,174 1,774 81.6% 350 16.1% 49 2.3% 1 0.0%

7.A.c
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Draft D Renumbered (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D (renumbered)
District 4
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,263 -9 -0.4% 1,437 63.5% 797 35.2% 24 1.1% 5 0.2%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,655 1,379 83.3% 262 15.8% 14 0.8% 0 0.0%

7.A.c
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Draft D Renumbered (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) City of Healdsburg
Draft D (renumbered)
District 5
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
2020 Census
Other % Latino % Asian % Black %
Citizen Voting Age Population
Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black % 2,215 -57 -2.5% 1,494 67.4% 665 30.0% 43 1.9% 13 0.6%
Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP % 1,345 1,034 76.9% 248 18.4% 63 4.7% 0 0.0%

7.A.c
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Draft D Renumbered (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 4875-1596-6974 v1
Tentative Timeline for Consideration and Implementation of District-Based Elections Date Event Code § Comment
10/3/24 City received certified
demand letter from
Shenkman & Hughes
EC§10010(e)(1) Before commencing an action to enforce Sections 14027 and 14028, a prospective plaintiff shall send by certified mail a written notice to the clerk of the political subdivision (“City’) against which the action would be brought asserting that the City’s method of conducting elections may violate the California Voting Rights Act.

EC§ 10010(e)(2) A prospective plaintiff shall not commence an action to enforce Sections 14027 and 14028 within 45 days of the City’s receipt of the written notice described above (CVRA lawsuit cannot be commenced until November 17, 2024. Since this is a Sunday use the November 18, 2024 date).
11/18/24 Resolution is
considered at City
Council Meeting
EC§ 10010 (3)(A) Within 45 days of receipt of a notice, the City may pass a resolution outlining its intention to transition from at-large to district-based elections, specific steps it will undertake to facilitate this transition, and an estimated time frame for doing so. (CVRA lawsuit cannot be commenced until November 17, 2024. Since this is a Sunday use the November 18, 2024 date).
11/18/24 Resolution is adopted
at City Council
Meeting
EC§ 10010(e)(3)(B) If the City begins the process of switching to districts within 45 days and adopts a resolution to that effect a potential plaintiff cannot commence an action within 90 days of the resolution’s passage. (CVRA lawsuit cannot be commenced until February 16, 2025, with 60 day extension, the new date would be April 17, 2025.

Before
First Public
Hearing
and
throughout
process
Conduct public
outreach, encourage
public participation,
and receive public
input
EC§ 10010(a)(1)
The City may conduct outreach to the public, including to non-English-speaking communities, to explain the districting process and to encourage public participation.(i.e. farmers market, public library, public schools, places of worship, homeowners associations, and community organizations)
12/16/24 1st Public Hearing
(Regular Meeting)
EC§ 10010(a)(1) First and second public hearings must occur within a period of 30 days.

No maps for review, but take public comments on composition of districts and preference for district lines.
1/6/25 2nd Public Hearing
(Regular Meeting)
EC§ 10010(a)(1) No maps for review, but take public comments on composition of districts and preference for district lines.
2/10/25 Publish for review
first drafts of district
election maps and
EC§ 10010(a)(2) After all draft maps are drawn, at least 7 days before the 3rd public hearing, the City shall publish and make available for release at least one draft map and, if city councilmembers

7.A.d
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Tentative Timeline Re Implementing District Based Elections (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - 4875-1596-6974 v1
potential sequence of
elections
will be elected in their districts at different times to provide for staggered terms of office, the potential sequence of the elections.
2/18/25 3rd Public Hearing
(Regular Meeting)
EC§ 10010(a)(2) The City shall also hold at least two additional hearings over a period of no more than 45 days, at which the public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft map or maps and the proposed sequence of elections, if applicable. 3/10/25 Post any new or
amended maps
EC§ 10010(a)(2) Maps available for review at least 7 days before consideration at the 4th public hearing. 3/17/25 4th Public Hearing
(Regular Meeting)
EC§ 10010(a)(2) Take public comments on proposed maps. Council may introduce ordinance adopting the map at this meeting if map is not changed and selected at this public hearing. If map is changed at this meeting, the map will need to be published again for 7 days and ordinance cannot be introduced until 7 days after amended map is published. 3/31/25 Post any new or
amended maps
EC§ 10010(a)(2) Maps available for review at least 7 days before consideration at the 5th public hearing. 4/7/25 5th Public Hearing
(Regular Meeting)
• If Council makes revisions to map introduced on 3/17/25, Council can re-introduce ordinance establishing district elections, including district boundaries and election sequence and adopt ordinance at next regular meeting on 4/21/25; or adjourn this regular meeting on 4/7/25 to another date to adopt ordinance; Or
• If no revisions to map prior to second reading of the ordinance adopting the map, Council can adopt ordinance at this meeting;
Or
• Make further changes to map without introduction of the ordinance adopting the map.

DEADLINE
4/17/25
EC§ 10010(e)(3)(B)

7.A.d
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Tentative Timeline Re Implementing District Based Elections (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - 1 | P a g e
Public Maps: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment
The following map was submitted by March 31, 2025 and can be considered during the April 7 public hearing Under the FAIR MAPS Act, the City of Healdsburg is required to follow a ranked list of criteria in their districting process:
• Relatively equal in population size – total deviation is under 10% • Contiguous
• Maintains “communities of interest”
• Easily identifiable and understandable lines, following city, natural, and man-made boundaries
• Compact
As demographers, we can assess all criteria objectively except for “maintaining communities of interest.” This particular criterion is subjective by definition and should be discussed by the public and the City Council to determine how well these maps fulfil this criterion.

ID 290505
“Update Map A”
Total Deviation: 8.5 %
Date of submission: 3/19/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*There are some noncontiguous edge pieces that need to be cleaned up.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 2 | P a g e
The following maps were submitted by March 10, 2025 and were considered during the March 17 public hearing
ID 284214
Total Deviation: 49.2 %
Date of submission: 2/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 284372
"Best Map Ever"
Total Deviation: >100 %
Date of submission: 2/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 3 | P a g e
ID 284689
"Map 1"
Total Deviation: 3.9%
Date of submission: 2/16/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 284694
"Map 2"
Total Deviation: 7.6%
Date of submission: 2/16/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 284697
"Map 3"
Total Deviation: 2.0 %
Date of submission: 2/16/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?

Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 4 | P a g e
ID 285286 "Modification of Draft Map C with all the notes from council members taken into account. Don’t mind the long sliver of the light green district the goes on the west side of Healdsburg ave north of powell, those are all commerical north of powell, the people on the west side of the ave. south of powel should be apart of the central district. The smallest population is the north district like Hagele" Total Deviation: 11.5%
Date of submission: 2/19/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?

ID 286075 "Revision of Draft Map C but using streets such as Powell, University and Matheson as boarders"
Total Deviation: 11.9%
Date of submission: 2/25/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 286781 "Draft C2 revision
– B. Crabb"
Total Deviation: 9.8%
Date of submission: 2/27/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?

*District 3’s tail potentially makes this uncompact.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 5 | P a g e
The following maps were submitted on or before February 10, 2025 and were considered at the February 18 public hearing.

Four-District Maps
ID 283651
"Tessa Kraft 2"
Total Deviation: 1.7%
Date of submission: 2/10/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*There is a portion of District 3 in District 4, and it would need to be fixed before considering as a potential draft map.

ID 283434
"Tessa Kraft"
Total Deviation: 15.7%
Date of submission: 2/9/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? *
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*A small portion of District 4 is in District 1.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 6 | P a g e
ID 282146
Total Deviation: 6.3%
Date of submission: 2/3/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 7 | P a g e
ID 281023
"beatriz"
Total Deviation: 2.6%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
A portion of District 3 is in District 2 and would need to be fixed, in addition to unpopulated/missing blocks.

ID 281020
"Hola"
Total Deviation: 11%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
*
Compact? ✓
*In addition to equal population and contiguity issues, District 3’s lines would need to be cleaned up.

ID 281015,
"Sandra Nava"
Total Deviation: 39.1%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?

Compact? 
Appears to be an unfinished map.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 8 | P a g e
ID 281011
"Ali Rodriguez"
Total Deviation: 18.7%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?

Compact? 
ID 280379
Total Deviation: 3.4%
Date of submission 1/26/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? 
District 1 is barely contiguous and cleanup is advised if choosing this map as a potential draft map.

ID 2800118
"Four Districts + Mayor for entire city"
Total Deviation: 5.9%
Date of submission 1/24/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 9 | P a g e
ID 280047
4 districts + 1 mayor"
Total Deviation: 5.4%
Date of submission 1/24/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*A piece of District 1 is in District 4 and should be corrected before being considered as a draft map.

ID 279877
"Sunset Drive Team #1"
Total Deviation: 8.7%
Date of submission 1/23/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*A piece of District 1 is in District 4 and should be corrected before being considered as a draft map.

ID 279849
"4 plus Mayor = 5"
Total Deviation: 6.7%
Date of submission 1/23/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*A piece of District 1 is in District 4 and should be corrected before being considered as a draft map.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 10 | P a g e
ID 279822
"FT Residents Voices 1st"
Total Deviation: 3.9%
Date of submission 1/23/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*A piece of District 1 is in District 4 and should be corrected before being considered as a draft map.

ID 279020
"North District was intentionally the lowest population deviation at

9.72% because in reality, ENSO and Montage area have increased the voter base for the north district. At Large Mayor a must!” Total Deviation: 19%
Date of submission 1/20/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*Missing census blocks need to be populated.

ID 278633
"4 Districts"
Total Deviation: 11.4%
Date of submission 1/18/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 11 | P a g e
ID 278059
"Fair Healdsburg - need a Mayor!"
Total Deviation: 15.1%
Date of submission 1/15/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?

ID 277851
"Less than 1% SD is possible. Prefer at large mayor.”
Total Deviation: 1.3%
Date of submission: 1/14/25
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 277767
"Four Chunks"
Total Deviation: 2.9%
Date of submission: 1/14/25
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 12 | P a g e
ID 277766
"4+Mayor"
Total Deviation: 0.6%
Date of submission: 1/14/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓*
*District 1 may be considered noncompact but it allows the other districts to be more compact.

ID 277598
"More than 4 districts is difficult for Healdsburg – 4 + at large mayor” Total Deviation: 7.7%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓*
*District 1 may be considered noncompact but it allows the other districts to be more compact.

ID 277596
"4 + At Large Mayor makes the most sense!”
Total Deviation: 1.9%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓*
*District 1 may be considered noncompact but it allows the other districts to be more compact.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 13 | P a g e
ID 277561
"DP4"
Total Deviation: 0.7%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277527
"Tara 4 districts"
Total Deviation: 3.3%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓*
*There are a couple of small census blocks in the wrong districts that can be easily fixed.

ID 277487
"Cells need some tunning"
Total Deviation: 15.6%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 14 | P a g e
ID 277475
Total Deviation: 18.9%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?

Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 277459
"Block One"
Total Deviation: 3.1%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
There’s a misplaced census block, which is easy to fix.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 15 | P a g e
Five-District Maps
ID 283716
"Distribution"
Total Deviation: 3.8%
Date of submission: 2/10/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?

Compact? 
ID 283622
Total Deviation: 5.3%
Date of submission: 2/10/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓*
*District 1 may not be compact, but it allows the other four districts to remain compact.

ID 283612
"Fitch River Grove 1.8% Dev"
Total Deviation: 3.3%
Date of submission: 2/10/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 16 | P a g e
ID 283611
"Fitch River Grove 8.4% Dev"
Total Deviation: 16%
Date of submission: 2/10/25
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 283248
"BLUE LEMON V.1"
Total Deviation: 6.7%
Date of submission: 2/8/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 282037
Total Deviation: 6%
Date of submission: 2/3/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 17 | P a g e
ID 281774
"Plan CDG"
Total Deviation: 1.7%
Date of submission: 2/1/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 281306
Total Deviation: 12.1%
Date of submission 1/29/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 281027
"Mi Mapa"
Total Deviation: 2.5%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 18 | P a g e
ID 281026
"amelco"
Total Deviation: 7.4%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? *
*District 3 has a dovetail that needs to be cleaned up, in addition to the contiguity issues.

ID 281025
"Elia G"
Total Deviation: 6%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
ID 281024
"Hola"
Total Deviation: 8.8%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
A portion of District 3 is in District 2 and would need to be fixed, in addition to unpopulated/missing blocks.

Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 19 | P a g e
ID 281022
"Cecilia"
Total Deviation: 15.6%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
A portion of District 3 is in District 2 and would need to be fixed, in addition to unpopulated/missing blocks.

ID 281019
"Francisca Frores"
Total Deviation: 34.5%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?

Compact? 
ID 281017
"My Map"
Total Deviation: 0.5%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓*
Compact? 
*The dovetail in District 3 would need to be cleaned up, in addition to adding the missing population/census block that were excluded.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 20 | P a g e
ID 281016
"Cristina"
Total Deviation: 15.1%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 281014
"Hola"
Total Deviation: 86.2%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?

Lines are easy to understand and
identify?

Compact?

ID 281012
"xochil"
Total Deviation: 2.6%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?

Lines are easy to understand and
identify?

Compact?

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 21 | P a g e
ID 281010
Total Deviation: 15.6%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
* Missing census blocks need to be populated in order to be considered as a draft map, in addition to fixing the equal population issue.

ID 281009
"Jesus y Consuelo Lopez"
Total Deviation: 36.3%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
* Missing census blocks need to be populated in order to be considered as a draft map, in addition to fixing the equal population issue.

ID 281008
"Maria Garcia"
Total Deviation: 42.5%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
* Missing census blocks need to be populated in order to be considered as a draft map, in addition to fixing the equal population issue.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 22 | P a g e
ID 281007
"Adela Perez"
Total Deviation: 46.6%
Date of submission 1/28/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? *
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
* Missing census blocks need to be populated in order to be considered as a draft map, in addition to fixing the equal population issue.

ID 279117
"NO at Large Mayor /5D"
Total Deviation: 5.9%
Date of submission 1/21/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? *
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
* Missing census blocks need to be populated in order to be considered as a draft map, and a portion of District 3 is in District 5 and needs to be fixed.

ID 279111
"5 Districts / rotating"
Total Deviation: 7.7%
Date of submission 1/21/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
* Missing census blocks need to be populated in order to be considered as a draft map.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 23 | P a g e
ID 278392
"Gulliver"
Total Deviation: 6%
Date of submission 1/16/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 278352
"2025"
Total Deviation: 9%
Date of submission 1/16/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓*
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*Unpopulated census blocks must be populated, and this might throw off the equal population; however, it can be adjusted to remain under 10%.

ID 278263
"The Neighbors"
Total Deviation: 0.6%
Date of submission 1/16/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*District 1 needs to be completely touching in order to be considered contiguous. This can be fixed.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 24 | P a g e
ID 278051
"make a latino district"
Total Deviation: 7.9%
Date of submission 1/15/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓*
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*Unpopulated census blocks need to be populated, which would likely change the total deviation.

ID 277796
"Hank#1"
Total Deviation: 15.9%
Date of submission 1/14/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277777
"Five"
Total Deviation: 2.8%
Date of submission 1/14/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 25 | P a g e
ID 277577
Total Deviation: 14.7%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*There are a couple of small census blocks in the wrong districts, which can be easily fixed.

ID 277549
"DP5"
Total Deviation: 0.7%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277521
"Tara map 5 districts"
Total Deviation: 3.7%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? 
District 3 is noncompact.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 26 | P a g e ID 277488
Total Deviation: 13.1%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 277485
"North, Downtown, River, Fitch and Central"
Total Deviation: 16%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size?

Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 277480
Total Deviation: 5%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 27 | P a g e ID 277474
"First Pass"
Total Deviation: 5.7%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 278334
Total Deviation: 5.9%
Date of submission 1/16/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓
ID 277471
"First"
Total Deviation: 9.5%
Date of submission 1/13/2025
Relatively equal in population size?
✓
Contiguous?
✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact?
✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 28 | P a g e
Six-District Maps
ID 283667
"Tried but no Hispanic voting block"
Total Deviation: 10.7%
Date of submission: 2/10/25
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 283552
"6 seats elect the Mayor"
Total Deviation: 7.7%
Date of submission: 2/10/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? 
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?

Compact? ✓
District 6 is divided by District 5, and the lines deviate from other public maps, which raises questions about whether the lines are easy to identify and understand.

ID 278058
"SixDistricts-4%PopDiviation-mj"
Total Deviation: 8.1%
Date of submission: 1/15/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
District 6 is divided by District 5, and the lines deviate from other public maps, which raises questions about whether the lines are easy to identify and understand.

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 29 | P a g e
ID 278037
"6 district, at large mayor: evaluation mode”
Total Deviation: 20.7%
Date of submission: 1/15/25
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277981
"6 districts"
Total Deviation: 5.5%
Date of submission: 1/15/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277853
"less than 1% SD also possible for 6 Districts and at large mayor” Total Deviation: 1.2%
Date of submission: 1/14/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 30 | P a g e
ID 277781
"AddAnotherChairToTheDias!"
Total Deviation: 8.4%
Date of submission: 1/14/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓*
Contiguous? ✓*
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
*There are missing census blocks, which may overpopulate the overall total deviation. Additionally, there is a small portion of District 1 in District 2, which can be easily fixed.

ID 277770
"6+1"
Total Deviation: 4.3%
Date of submission: 1/14/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277743
"6 Districts with Elected Mayor"
Total Deviation: 7.5%
Date of submission: 1/14/25
Relatively equal in population size? ✓
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? 

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 31 | P a g e
ID 277608
"Attempt at 6 districts"
Total Deviation: 10.5%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277604
"6 Districts could work with at large mayor – anyone notice there are 7 seats on the Dais? Let’s fill 7 seats!”
Total Deviation: 14.6%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓
ID 277473
"6 w/ at large mayor"
Total Deviation: 15.6%
Date of submission: 1/13/25
Relatively equal in population size? 
Contiguous? ✓
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
✓
Compact? ✓

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections) 32 | P a g e
One-District Maps
ID 280517
"One City"
Total Deviation: --
Date of submission 1/27/2025
Relatively equal in population size? NA
Contiguous? NA
Lines are easy to understand and
identify?
NA
Compact? NA

7.A.e
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: FAIR MAPS Act Assessment 3.31.25 (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections)

7.A.f
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Public Comment (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections)

7.A.f
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Public Comment (4827 : Public Hearing #6 - District Elections)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Designating Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Area
PREPARED BY: Lance MacDonald, Fire Marshal/Division Chief STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Provide Effective Governance
Maintain and Enhance Public Health and Safety
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Introduce for first reading, by title only, waiving further reading of the text, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Healdsburg designating fire hazard severity zones in the Local Responsibility Area (LRA).

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The Fire Hazard Severity Zone map was posted for public review and comment as required by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). The City made the proposed map available through its website and city offices to ensure transparency and community awareness.

BACKGROUND:

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) periodically updates Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps based on current science and fire modeling. These updates reflect changes in vegetation, topography, weather patterns, and fire behavior and are used to identify areas at significant risk for wildland fires. The new Local Responsibility Area map for the City of Healdsburg was finalized and released by CAL FIRE on February 24, 2025.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

CAL FIRE’s updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone map identifies areas within the City of Healdsburg that are subject to heightened wildfire risk. Adoption of the map by ordinance allows the City to align with State fire prevention policies and ensure the enforcement of defensible space regulations and other risk-reduction strategies. Adopting this ordinance also maintains the City's eligibility for related fire prevention grants and resources.

9.A
Packet Pg. 178
Existing Law:

Pursuant to Government Code Sections 51175–51189 and Public Resources Code Sections 4201–4204, jurisdictions are required to adopt the CAL FIRE-recommended Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps and implement enforcement mechanisms to mitigate fire risk in designated areas.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

This ordinance promotes wildfire resilience and community safety by enabling proactive vegetation management and fire mitigation strategies in high-risk areas.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may direct staff to return with alternative language or defer adoption; however, non-adoption within 120 days may result in non-compliance with the State mandate.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact resulting from this ordinance adoption.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This administrative action does not constitute a project as defined in Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines and is therefore exempt.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Ordinance
Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map

9.A
Packet Pg. 179

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG DESIGNATING THE FIRE HAZARD

SEVERITY ZONES IN THE LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA
(LRA)
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Healdsburg does ordain as follows:

Section 1. The City of Healdsburg hereby designates the Fire Hazard Severity Zones within is Local Responsibility Area (LRA) as recommended by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) pursuant to Government Code Section 51178.

The map, approved by the City of Healdsburg and incorporated by reference herein, is entitled “City of Healdsburg Fire Hazard Severity Zones – Local Responsibility Area (LRA)” and is based on final maps released by CAL FIRE on February 24, 2025.

Section 2. Environmental Determination. The Council finds that the adoption and implementation of this ordinance are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility that the adoption of this ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day following its adoption.

INTRODUCED by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg on the 21st day of April 2025, and PASSED and APPROVED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ____ day of _____ 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ____________________________________ Evelyn L. Mitchell, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk
Dated: ______________________________

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Ordinance (4832 : Fire Hazard Severity Zones – 1st Reading) City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1)
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources:

Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of California Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. and other relevant factors including areas where winds
have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.
statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire
Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Waterbody
Federal Responsibility
Area (FRA)
Unzoned LRA
Incorporated City
Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers
Scale: 1:37,000 at 11" x 17"
Km 0 1 2 3
Mi 0 1
Very High High Moderate
Very High High Moderate
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal Healdsburg 101

UNINCORPORATED
SONOMA CO.

February 24, 2025
As Identified by the
State Fire Marshal
Local Responsibility Area
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
CITY OF HEALDSBURG – SONOMA COUNTY
Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility
Area (SRA), Effective April 1, 2024

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map (4832 : Fire Hazard Severity Zones – 1st Reading)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: 2025 Sewer System Management Plan Audit and Findings PREPARED BY: Patrick Fuss, Water/Wastewater Engineer
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Maintain and Enhance Public Health and Safety
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Receive the 2025 Sewer System Management Plan Audit that reviews the effectiveness of the 2020 Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP).

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

No community engagement was sought for this item.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Healdsburg (City) owns, operates, and maintains a sanitary sewer collection system to collect and convey sewage from homes and businesses to the Water Reclamation Facility for treatment. The City’s sanitary sewer system consists of approximately 50 miles of sewer mains and 11 sewer lift stations. The sanitary sewer system serves approximately 10,985 people through approximately 4,973 service connections.

The sanitary sewer operated under a permit administered by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board in compliance with Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems (SSS WDR, Order WQ 2022-0103-DWQ).

The SSS WDR requires that sanitary sewer system operators prepare a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) to document the policies, procedures, and responsible parties for the proper operation and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system. The goal of the SSMP is to help the sewer system operators minimize sanitary sewer spills (i.e. unauthorized releases from the sewer system).

The SSMP is intended to be a useful document and, as such, requires periodic revisiting for effectiveness in the form of an audit. This revisiting or SSMP Audit is required every two years

9.B
Packet Pg. 182
following updates to the SSMP. The City of Healdsburg SSMP was updated in 2023 to capture revisions to the spill emergency response plan; the SSMP Audit was completed in February 2025.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The SSMP Audit reviews sewer system performance with respect to spills, documents the findings, and identifies areas of improvement.

Spills
The City’s spill events per 100 miles of pipe have decreased over the years. This reduction coincides with the 2020 SSMP update and the implementation of the computerized maintenance management program (CMMS) which was one of the recommendations of the 2020 SSMP.

Table 1 Local, Regional, and Statewide Comparison of Spill Data FY # of Spills per 100 miles of pipe Spill Volume (gal) per 100 miles of pipe City Region 1 State City Region 1 State
2015/16 11.3 3.1 4.0 660 2,226 25,134
2016/17 24.4 3.4 3.7 73,981 73,372 49,725
2017/18 5.6 3.2 3.0 240,145 12,710 8,674
2018/19 11.3 3.9 3.2 120,848 69,478 23,982
2019/20 7.4 2.0 2.57 2480 1,358 17,993
2020/21 11.1 2.33 2.7 2200 3,916 7,909
2021/22 3.7 1.96 2.77 37 3,148 27,177
2022/23 3.7 2.66 2.74 194 49,505 177,777
2023/24 3.7 1.77 1.03 206 43,931 33,869
While the performance of the collection system has improved, the City’s metrics are behind the North Coast Region (Cotati north to the Oregon-California border) and State averages.

The sanitary spills in Healdsburg are attributed to three primary causes: roots, debris, and FOG (fats, oils and grease). Roots enter the pipe through cracks such as separated joints and cracking in the pipe body. These are indicative of an aging sewer system in need of rehabilitation and/or replacement.

Similarly, debris, such as gravel, can enter through similar pipeline defects as roots and often enter after roots have compromised small defects making them larger. Another source of debris is personal wipes. Personal wipes, while advertised as flushable, are slow to disintegrate and can accumulate at roots and pipe defects that make the flow surface not smooth. Staff have a public outreach program through social media and bill inserts that remind the residents that wipes should not be flushed down the sewer.

FOG in the sewer is primarily congealed cooking wastes. As with wipes, staff have a public outreach program through social media and bill inserts that remind the residents that grease and oils should not be flushed down the sewer. The City also has a program with commercial food establishments requiring the establishments install and maintain grease interceptors, which are

9.B
Packet Pg. 183
regularly monitored by staff. Some FOG inevitably enters the sewer and accumulates on the pipe walls at sags in the flow line and at locations where flow velocity is slowed. Where possible these defects are corrected by localized reconstruction. Larger segment reconstruction requires capital improvement investment to correct.

Capacity limitations have not been the attributed cause of spills in the collection system.

However, the collection system experiences a high influx of rainfall-derived inflow and infiltration (I/I). This is evidenced by the high flow peaks (greater than 7 times normal summertime flows) at the pump stations and treatment plant after a rain event. As with roots and debris that have caused spills, pipe defects and cracks are the likely cause of much of the (I/I) and could be reduced with rehabilitation and/or replacement of the damaged pipes.

Other Findings
The SSMP Audit also reviews the administration of the SSMP against the requirements of the SSS WDR. Staff found that the City scored well on most of the requirements but still needs to improve on others. The requirements in need of improvement consist of:
• Training – Staff are required to receive annual training on sewer system operational and maintenance and the spill emergency response plan.
• FOG Disposal plan - The City should develop a list of acceptable grease haulers and verify where each is disposing of hauled material.
• Measure effectiveness of SSMP elements - Conduct the I/I investigation and develop a corrective CIP project(s) to address the I/I.

Staff is working to address these deficiencies noted in the SSMP Audit.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

A managed approach to sewer system operation and maintenance leads to improved performance of the sewer system. This results in less sewage spills that are detrimental to the environment.

ALTERNATIVES:

There are no actions requested, or alternatives provided with this staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact directly associated with this staff report. Recommendations for corrective measures requiring capital improvements and the associated costs are addressed separately with the respective improvements in the capital improvements plan.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

The receipt and review of SSMP Audit is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because informational items are not a project since they are not a discretionary action by a governmental agency and will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

9.B
Packet Pg. 184

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 21, 2025
SUBJECT: Abel De Luna Community Center Multicultural Center Concept and Grant Funding from Sonoma County
PREPARED BY: Mark Themig, Community Services Director
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Provide Effective Governance
Provide Resident-Driven Community Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Receive a presentation and provide direction to staff regarding (1) the integration of concepts from a multicultural center planning process into the design and operation of the Abel De Luna Community Center, and (2) receipt of $500,000 in proposed grant funding from Sonoma County through Supervisor James Gore’s office.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The City of Healdsburg’s 2023 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion plan (DEI Plan) by Acosta Latino Learning Partnership includes recommendations and goals for the review, improvement, and establishment of community equity programming both within the City government and throughout the greater Healdsburg Community. Nine community events and in-depth listening sessions with 150 community members informed the DEI Plan, which recommends the development of a multicultural center to provide a space dedicated to celebrating cultural heritage and fostering a sense of belonging.

The Healthcare Foundation of Northern Sonoma County (the Foundation) led an initiative in 2024 to advance the multicultural center goal and brought together several community partners, including Corazón Healdsburg, and Alliance Medical Center. The Foundation engaged Goring & Straja Architects and Carducci Associates, two Bay area design firms, who led a participatory process that engaged 129 residents through surveys, eight listening sessions, and two design workshops. The resulting Multicultural Center Report identifies the existing Abel De Luna Community Center as the preferred location for a multicultural center and outlines design and programming concepts that would build upon existing resources and strengthen community connections to realize the multicultural center goal by integrating it within the existing

9.C
Packet Pg. 185
community center.

BACKGROUND:

In 2021, the City Council awarded a contract to Acosta Latino Learning Partnership (ALLP) for the development of a DEI Plan for the City.

On August 7, 2023, the City Council received a presentation from staff and ALLP on the draft DEI Plan and directed staff to hold an implementation workshop, which occurred on October 23, 2023.

In February 2024, the Healthcare Foundation announced a grant of $285,000 from Providence to support a community convening and visioning process for residents of Healdsburg to explore the potential for a multicultural Community Wellness Center commenced a multicultural center initiative to begin realizing the multicultural center recommendations contained in the DEI Plan.

The Foundation held eight listening sessions and two design workshops throughout 2024 and released its Multicultural Center Report in January 2025.

Sonoma County Supervisor James Gore notified staff in February 2025 that he intends to contribute $500,000 in Sonoma County grant funding for implementation of the Multicultural Center concepts identified in the Foundation’s report. This award would also be related to enhancing the Community Center’s role as a resiliency hub during times disasters, emergency response, and recovery.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The Foundation’s Multicultural Center Report includes a master plan concept based upon input from the Foundation’s participatory process. The plan illustrates several recommendations that can be implemented at the Abel De Luna Community Center to integrate the multicultural center concepts within it. The interventions are presented in a framework of six tiers that can be implemented in phases. The Foundation suggests an initial focus on the first three tiers.

Tier 1: Introduce painting of the exterior walls with bright colors to add vibrancy. This will also help identify each building and courtyard and help with visitor wayfinding. Introduce community-based multicultural murals based on traditional themes.

Tier 2: Renovate the east courtyard, the west courtyard near the Corazón offices and the Alliance Medical Center and renovate the south courtyard. This will soften the courtyards, add plants and shade and provide a place for events and outdoor gatherings. Renovate the planting next to the covered walkway between the east courtyard and the south courtyard. Consider adding rain gardens in the courtyards to treat stormwater from impervious surfaces before entering Foss Creek.

Tier 3: Renovate the Multipurpose Room and create an indoor/outdoor relationship with the east courtyard. Renovate the Community Meeting Room to create an indoor/outdoor relationship with the west courtyard and the Corazón offices. Add fire sprinklers as part of the room renovations.

Consider adding rain gardens in the courtyard to treat stormwater from impervious surfaces before entering Foss Creek.

9.C
Packet Pg. 186
Tiers 4-6 are detailed in the attached report from the Foundation.

Supervisor Gore requested that his $500,000 in grant funding be used for near-term implementation of the multicultural center concepts. Additional funding has not been identified.

Due to these funding limitations, staff recommends that the grant funding be used for an improvement project that includes the painting and planting concepts in Tier 1 and Tier 2.

A preliminary grant-funded project budget is as follows:
• Paint the community center’s exterior walls, soffits, eves, flashings, fascia, doors, door frames and window trim, including full primer and two finish coats of paint o $225,000
• Commission community-based multicultural mural
o $50,000
• Landscaping, shade structures, other site improvements o $225,000
If City Council directs staff to move forward with the multicultural center plan and receive funding from Sonoma County, staff will return to City Council with more details on the scope of work, along with a grant agreement that would authorize receipt of the funding.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Should a painting and planting improvement project move forward, the project could incorporate Zero-VOC paints and native plants.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council could direct staff to focus on the implementation of other multicultural center concepts from the Foundation’s Report. Or City Council could direct staff to decline the grant funding from Supervisor Gore entirely.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The grant from Supervisor Gore does not require any matching funds from the City. Any implementation of the multicultural center concepts would be scoped so that the work does not exceed the $500,000 of grant funding available from Sonoma County.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Prior to final City Council action on the Foundation’s multicultural center concepts and master plan, the City will undertake the necessary environmental review pursuant to Sections 21000 et seq., of the Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act; "CEQA") and in accordance with Sections 15000 et seq., of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines).

ATTACHMENT(S):

Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation
Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report
Public Comment

9.C
Packet Pg. 187
Healdsburg Multicultural
Center

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center "In order to have a more effective
and efficient way of communicating
with the large Spanish speaking
community in Healdsburg, and other
emerging cultures and languages, we
believe the city of Healdsburg should
develop a multicultural center that is
housed within the Community
Services/Parks and Recreation
department“-Healdsburg DEI Report 2023

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Healdsburg Listening Sessions with Funding from Providence Health

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center "Analyzing well-being across Healdsburg's
three census tracts, reveals disparities
that may disproportionately impact
specific racial and ethnic groups.“-Healdsburg
Multicultural Center Report
"This analysis of Healdsburg reveals a community rich in diversity and history but also marked by socioeconomic
disparities and unequal access to resources across its
neighborhoods. Recognizing these disparities is crucial for creating a truly inclusive and equitable Multicultural Center. “- Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report
North Healdsburg presents a concerning
picture with the lowest scores in health and
education. This indicates significant challenges
faced by residents in this area, including
potential barriers to accessing healthcare
services and limited educational
opportunities. These factors can contribute to
poorer health outcomes and lower
educational attainment potentially trapping
residents in cycles of disadvantage
Healdsburg Socioeconomic Indicators

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Data
Collection and
Analysis
Survey Cards
Quantitative
Qualitative

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Community Mandates

1. Multigenerational Spaces for
Movement and Play

2. Community Kitchen and Café

3. Collaborative Murals

4. Sensory-Aware Design

5. Spaces for Creative Expression

6. Environmental Justice

7. Lifelong Learning Hub

8. Community Gathering Spaces

9. Digital Access and Literacy

10. Access, Autonomy,
Accountability and Justice

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Location
• Familiarity and Comfort
• Increased Feasibility
• Centralized Community Hub
"When asked about the ideal location for the Healdsburg Multicultural Center, participants overwhelmingly favored integrating it into the existing Healdsburg Community Center at 1557 Healdsburg Ave. "

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Visioning Session 1 “Dot Polling”

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Visioning Session 2

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center First Tier: Introduce Painting of the
exterior walls with bright colors to add
vibrancy.

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Add plants and shade and provide a place
for events and outdoor gatherings.

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Second Tier: Renovate the east courtyard, the west
courtyard near the Corazon offices and the Alliance Medical Center and renovate the south courtyard.

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Third Tier: Renovate the Multipurpose Room and
create an indoor/outdoor relationship with the
east courtyard.

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Next Steps

1. Committed Funding: $500,000 Supervisor Gore District 4

2. Anticipated Funding: $100,000 Providence Health

3. Healthcare Foundation’s Role

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center Thank You!
Amy Ramirez
Executive Director
Healthcare Foundation Northern Sonoma County
[email protected]

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Presentation (4645 : Multicultural Center

HEALDSBURG MULTICULTURAL CENTER
January 2025

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
• Dot Polling Review & Commonalities 35 • Site Planning Activity & Results 37 ‣ Future Directions 47 • Master Plan Concept 48 • 3D Model Perspectives 50 Appendix 59 ‣ A: Protocol Questions 60 ‣ B: Detailed Results from Each Survey Cards Question 61 ‣ C: Detailed Results from Overall Survey Frequency 66 ‣ D: Visioning Session Workshop Handouts 69 ‣ E: Visioning Session 1 Imagery 72 Acknowledgements & References 90
Listening Sessions | On The Margins, Inc. 03 ‣ Executive Summary 04 ‣ Introduction 05 ‣ Healdsburg 07 ‣ Methodology 12 ‣ Findings, Conclusions, and Confirmations 14 Visioning Sessions | Goring & Straja Architects + Carducci Associates 17 ‣ Workshop #01 18 • Context & Existing Conditions 20 • Dot Polling & Results 24 ‣ Workshop #02 34 Table of Contents

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

LISTENING SESSIONS
EIGHT PUBLIC EVENTS LEAD BY ON THE MARGINS, INC.

BETWEEN JANUARY & OCTOBER, 2024

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
4 This report showcases the community's aspirations for the forthcoming Healdsburg Multicultural Center, shaped by a community-led research endeavor. In response to a profound need for a multicultural and inclusive space of belonging, the Healthcare Foundation of Northern Sonoma County spearheaded this initiative, bringing together the following partners — On the Margins, Corazón Healdsburg, Alliance Medical Center, Goring & Straja Architects, and Carducci Associates.

Through a participatory process involving surveys, listening sessions, and design workshops, 129 residents shared their voices and perspectives, shaping the Healdsburg Multicultural Center from its conceptualization to its architectural design. Analysis of the collected data revealed key themes and priorities, giving rise to ten "Design Mandates" that serve as a roadmap for the center's development. These mandates champion:

1. Multigenerational Spaces for Movement and Play: Design spaces that promote physical well-being for all ages, including multipurpose sports fields, exercise areas, and play spaces for children and youth.

2. Community Kitchen & Cafe: Enjoy a community-led kitchen and cafeteria that fosters culinary skills, shared meal preparation, and access to healthy, affordable food.

3. Collaborative Murals: Partner with Healdsburg artists, especially those from LGBTQIA+ and BIPOC communities, to co-create murals that celebrate cultural diversity and empowerment.

4. Sensory-Aware Design: Create spaces that offer varying levels of sensory engagement, from vibrant and stimulating to quiet and calming, to accommodate diverse needs and preferences.

5. Spaces for Creative Expression: Dedicate areas for community-led arts, crafts, and music programs, emphasizing cultural traditions and the therapeutic benefits of creative expression.

6. Environmental Justice: Demonstrate a commitment to sustainability through the incorporation of native plants, traditional medicinal plants, and edible gardens. The design should prioritize reclaiming and restoring natural spaces historically taken from BIPOC communities.

7. Lifelong Learning Hub: Establish a center for intergenerational learning and career development, offering academic support, life skills training, career/technical education, and resources for literacy, GED preparation, and certifications.

8. Community Gathering Spaces: Provide flexible spaces designed to foster community interaction, gatherings, and cross-cultural connection. Support community-led events, celebrations, and shared activities.

9. Digital Access & Literacy: Ensure on-site computer access and provide technology education, including coding classes, for all community members.

10. Access, Autonomy, Accountability, and Justice: Maintain a strong commitment to mutual accountability and justice for underserved communities in Healdsburg. The center must be physically and financially accessible to all, with community voices central to its design and operation.

This report exemplifies the transformative power of community-based participatory research and collaborative partnerships in shaping spaces that promote well-being, cultural celebration, and a more equitable future for all Healdsburg residents.

Executive Summary

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
5 In 2024, the Healthcare Foundation of Northern Sonoma County, driven by a deep commitment to health equity, recognized the pressing need for a dedicated multicultural center in Healdsburg. This recognition was a response to a long-held community aspiration, brought to light through compelling evidence. A 2023 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion report by Acosta Latino Learning Partnership, which involved in-depth listening sessions with 150 community members, revealed a strong desire for a space dedicated to celebrating cultural heritage and fostering a sense of belonging. This contemporary finding resonated with a decades-old recommendation from a 1982 American Institute of Architects study that proposed a "Hispanic Community Center" to address the dwindling number of traditional gathering places for the city's growing Latine population. These converging voices, spanning generations, painted a clear picture: Healdsburg needed a vibrant, dedicated space where residents, particularly those historically marginalized, could connect, thrive, and access essential resources.

Introduction
Recognizing this historical context and the community's clearly articulated need, the Healthcare Foundation championed this vision, setting the Healdsburg Multicultural Center Project (HMCP) in motion. To ensure the initiative was truly community-driven, they enlisted On the Margins (OTM), an organization specializing in asset-based community development (ABCD) and participatory research. OTM, with its expertise in collaborative approaches like This photo depicts one of the listening sessions.
participatory mapping and "freedom dreaming" – methodologies that empower communities to envision and build their desired futures – was uniquely positioned to guide this effort.

Partnering with Corazón Healdsburg and Alliance Medical Center, two organizations deeply interwoven with the fabric of the Healdsburg community, OTM embarked on the HMCP. This initiative sought to cultivate a grassroots vision for a vibrant and inclusive space, one that authentically responded to the needs and aspirations of all residents, particularly those who are on the margins. Ensuring the active and meaningful engagement of these communities was paramount, with their voices and perspectives shaping every facet of the project, from its initial conception to the final design.

To gain a deeper understanding of the community's needs and aspirations for the HMCP, OTM, in collaboration with Alliance Medical Center and Corazón Healdsburg, facilitated a series of eight bilingual (Spanish and English) listening sessions in Healdsburg between January and October 2024. These in-person sessions provided a safe and welcoming platform for residents to share their visions for the center, prompting them to consider key questions such as:
• Who should the center serve, and who should be involved in its operation and governance?
• What kinds of activities, programs, and resources should it offer? • How should the physical space be designed to foster a welcoming and inclusive space of belonging? What amenities are essential?
• What kind of atmosphere, or "spirit," should the center cultivate? • What core values should guide the center's operations and programming? By prioritizing community voices and fostering collaborative exploration, the listening sessions laid the groundwork for a culturally responsive and inclusive space where everyone can feel a sense of belonging.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
6 During these eight listening sessions, Corazón Healdsburg and Alliance Medical Center meticulously documented the ideas, concerns, and aspirations expressed by Healdsburg residents. On the Margins then carefully analyzed this wealth of qualitative data, identifying recurring themes and priorities. These recurring themes, embodying the collective wisdom and desires of the community, were then synthesized into the "10 Design Mandates." These mandates served as guiding principles for the project, ensuring that the final design truly reflected the community's vision.

To further solidify the community's vision and translate it into tangible design concepts, two esteemed firms, Goring & Straja Architects and Carducci Associates, joined the HMCP. These two firms orchestrated two pivotal community sessions designed to bridge the gap between aspirations and architectural realities.

The inaugural community design session, held in September 2024, focused on exploring potential programs and architectural designs to best serve the Healdsburg Multicultural Center's mission. Participants delved into the "10 Design Mandates," with a particular emphasis on practical implementation and seamless integration into the existing Healdsburg Community Center site—the location favored by residents for the multicultural center. A key component of this session was a "dot polling" activity, an interactive exercise that allowed residents to quickly and visually express their design preferences, providing invaluable insights to guide the architects.

Building on this foundation, the second session in November 2024 shifted the focus to gathering community input on specific architectural and landscape design elements. This workshop fostered a collaborative environment where residents actively participated in a site planning activity, generating ideas for the center's layout, functionality, and aesthetic appeal. By actively involving the community in this process, their vision was firmly embedded into the project's design and development trajectory.

This report delves into the heart of Healdsburg’s aspirations for a Multicultural Center, weaving together the voices and visions of its residents. It first explores the demographic landscape of Healdsburg, providing a snapshot of its residents and their diverse backgrounds. It then presents a comprehensive analysis of community feedback, utilizing both traditional qualitative methods and innovative text mining techniques to uncover key themes and aspirations. These findings paint a vivid picture of the community's desired Healdsburg Multicultural Center.

Finally, it translates these aspirations into concrete design mandates, offering a roadmap for creating a space that truly reflects and serves the needs of all Healdsburg residents. This report is a testament to the power of community engagement and collaboration, showcasing the potential for creating a truly inclusive multicultural center in Healdsburg.

These photos illustrate the dot polling activity.

This photo illustrates the site planning activity.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
7 rich tapestry of cultures that contribute to the city's vibrant identity today, while also recognizing and honoring its indigenous roots.

Healdsburg
Population & Demographics
Healdsburg, a town in the heart of Sonoma County, California, is a place where history, culture, and demographics converge to create a unique and dynamic community. It is critical to acknowledge that Healdsburg stands on the unceded ancestral lands of the Southern Pomo people, specifically the Kaiyao Pomo. This historical context underscores the importance of recognizing the profound connection between the land, its original inhabitants, and Healdsburg’s identity today.

Healdsburg is home to a diverse population of over 11,000 residents. While the majority identify as White (65.64%), the town has significant Latine (27.82%) and mixed-race (7.38%) communities (See Table 1). It is important to recognize and value the presence and contributions of all residents, including the smaller but vital Asian, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander populations. The presence of different sociocultural groups enriches Healdsburg's social fabric, shaping its cultural landscape.

A closer look at Healdsburg's demographic profile reveals important trends. The age distribution skews older, with over a quarter of residents aged 65 or older. This demographic characteristic has the potential to influence the types of services and amenities desired within the community. Additionally, a significant portion of residents (15.23%) are foreign-born, indicating a rich history of immigration and cultural exchange that has undoubtedly contributed to Healdsburg’s unique strength and character.

Housing presents a serious challenge, with a median home value exceeding $900,000 and a median gross rent of over $2,000. These factors play a significant role in the socioeconomic dynamics within the community, highlighting the need to address affordability and ensure equity and justice for all residents.

Creating a truly inclusive and representative Multicultural Center in Healdsburg necessitates a deep understanding of its unique demographic landscape. This involves acknowledging the Characteristic Statistic
White Alone, percent 65.64%
Black or African-American Alone, percent 0%
American Indian and Alaska Native Alone, percent 0.23%
Asian Alone, percent 1.91%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Alone, percent 0.24% Other Race Alone, percent 18.19%
Two or More Races, percent 7.38%
Hispanic or Latine, percent 27.82%
Persons Under 5 Years, percent 4.67%
Persons Under 18 Years, percent 15.67%
Persons 65 Years or Older, percent 27.64%
Foreign-Born Persons, percent 15.23%
Owner-Occupied Housing Rate, percent 57.15%
Median Value of Owner-Occupied Housing Units $933,400
Median Gross Rent $2,167
TABLE 1. HEALDSBURG DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW (US CENSUS BUREAU) Note: This table provides a snapshot of Healdsburg's population using data from the US Census Bureau. It includes information on racial and ethnic composition, age distribution, foreign-born population, and housing characteristics.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
8 Socioeconomic Indicators
Healdsburg's relatively high median family income suggests a degree of affluence; however, a closer examination reveals socioeconomic complexities that affect residents' lives. For example, 8.7% of the population comprises non-citizens or undocumented individuals, who may encounter challenges accessing essential services and experience increased vulnerability due to their immigration status (See Table 2). In addition, 11.2% of residents identify as having a disability, underscoring the need for accessible and inclusive housing, transportation, and public spaces to ensure they can fully participate in wellness programs and community life.

A relatively high vacancy rate (14.6%) raises questions about housing affordability, seasonal residency patterns, or a potential mismatch between housing supply and demand.

Investigating these factors is crucial to understanding the dynamics of Healdsburg's housing market and addressing potential challenges. With 42.9% of households being renteroccupied, policies that support renters' rights and housing stability become paramount. This includes prioritizing affordable housing options, implementing tenant protections, and establishing eviction prevention programs to safeguard vulnerable and marginalized residents.

Although the majority of households have access to computers and broadband internet (over 95%), maintaining digital equity and addressing any remaining digital divide is vital. Bridging this gap is essential to prevent disparities in access to information, education, employment opportunities, and other critical resources in an increasingly digital world.

Understanding these socioeconomic nuances is fundamental for effective community planning and resource allocation in Healdsburg. By recognizing and addressing these complexities, the community can strive to ensure that all residents, regardless of income, background, or ability, have the opportunity to thrive and enjoy health, wellness, and a high quality of life.

Indicator Value
Non-U.S. Citizens/Undocumented Persons 8.7%
People with a Disability 11.2%
Median Family Income $94,799
Vacant Households 14.6%
Renter-Occupied Households 42.9%
Households with a Computer 95.6%
Households with Broadband Internet 95.2%
Note: This table presents additional insights into Healdsburg's population using 2022 data. It highlights the percentage of non-citizens and undocumented persons, individuals with disabilities, median family income, and housing-related indicators such as vacancy rates and renter-occupied households. Additionally, it provides information on computer and broadband access within households.

TABLE 2. SELECTED DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATORS, HEALDSBURG (2022 ACS 1-YEAR SUPPLEMENTAL ESTIMATES)
Wellbeing
City-wide data provides a valuable overview of Healdsburg, but a deeper understanding of resident well-being requires a more granular, neighborhood-level analysis. This approach can reveal hidden disparities and inform the development of targeted interventions to address specific needs and opportunities for improvement within distinct areas of the city. To better understand Healdsburg and its population, this report utilizes data from the Portrait of Sonoma's 2021 Update, focusing on three distinct Census Tracts within Healdsburg: North Healdsburg (1539.01), Central Healdsburg (1539.02), and Old Healdsburg (1539.03).

Comparing key well-being indicators across these areas provides a more nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing each neighborhood.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
9 interplay between various well-being factors and underscores the need for a multipronged approach to address the unique challenges faced by residents in Central Healdsburg.

The disparities in well-being across Healdsburg's neighborhoods highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions and equitable resource allocation. By understanding the specific challenges and opportunities within each neighborhood, the city can develop tailored strategies to improve the quality of life for all residents.

A Tale of Three Neighborhoods

The tale of three neighborhoods analysis reveals stark disparities in well-being across Healdsburg's census tracts, painting a picture of distinct realities experienced by residents in different parts of the city (See Table 3). A granular analysis underscores the importance of moving beyond city-wide averages to understand the nuanced experiences of residents within specific neighborhoods.
• Old Healdsburg: This census tract
emerges as the most advantaged area,
boasting the highest scores in health and
education. Residents here likely benefit
from factors such as access to quality
h e a l t h c a re s e r v i c e s a n d s t ro n g
educational institutions. This translates
to a higher overall quality of life and
greater access to resources, contributing
to better health outcomes, higher
educational attainment, and increased
economic stability.
• North Healdsburg: In stark contrast,
North Healdsburg presents a concerning
picture with the lowest scores in health and education. This indicates significant challenges faced by residents in this area, including potential barriers to accessing healthcare services and limited educational opportunities. These factors can contribute to poorer health outcomes and lower educational attainment potentially trapping residents in cycles of disadvantage.
• Central Healdsburg: This neighborhood occupies a middle ground, with strong health and education indices but the lowest income index. This suggests that while residents may have access to good healthcare and education, they may still face financial constraints or income inequality. This disparity highlights the complex TABLE 3. WELL-BEING INDICES BY CENSUS TRACT IN HEALDSBURG (PORTRAIT OF SONOMA, 2021)
Census Tract Health Index Education Index Income Index
North Healdsburg 5.58 5.80 6.22
Central Healdsburg 6.67 6.12 4.93
Old Healdsburg 8.67 6.55 6.17
Note: This table presents Health, Education, and Income Indices for different census tracts within Healdsburg.

These indices offer a comparative snapshot of well-being across these areas.

TABLE 4. HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX (HDI) AND LIFE EXPECTANCY BY CENSUS TRACT IN HEALDSBURG (PORTRAIT OF SONOMA, 2021)
Census Tract HDI Life Expectancy (at Birth)
North Healdsburg 5.84 79.4
Central Healdsburg 5.91 82.0
Old Healdsburg 7.13 86.8
Note: This table shows the Human Development Index (HDI) and life expectancy at birth for different census tracts in Healdsburg. The HDI is a composite index measuring achievements in key dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge, and a decent standard of living. Life expectancy at birth is an indicator of overall population health.

Healdsburg Plaza in Old Healdsburg

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
10 Human Development Index and Life Expectancy
Further analysis using the Human Development Index (HDI), a composite measure encompassing life expectancy, education, and income, reinforces the disparities observed across the three census tracts (See Table 4).
• Old Healdsburg: Leads with the highest HDI (7.13) and longest life expectancy (86.8 years), reflecting overall well-being.
• North Healdsburg: Has the lowest HDI (5.84) and shortest life expectancy (79.4 years), highlighting potential challenges related to socioeconomic factors, access to healthcare, and overall quality of life.
• Central Healdsburg: Falls in between, with an HDI of 5.91 and a life expectancy of 82 years, indicating room for improvement compared to Old Healdsburg.

See Table 4 for data.

Educational Attainment
Educational attainment levels in Healdsburg reveal significant disparities between neighborhoods, highlighting an unequal distribution of educational opportunities and resources across the city (See Table 5). These disparities have profound implications for residents' overall well-being, impacting their economic prospects, access to healthcare, and social mobility.
• Old Healdsburg: This neighborhood demonstrates the highest level of educational attainment, with a large proportion of residents holding a Bachelor's or Graduate/ Professional degree and a very low percentage of those without a high school diploma. This suggests that residents in Old Healdsburg benefit from greater access to quality education from early childhood through higher education, potentially leading to better job prospects, higher incomes, and improved overall well-being.

TABLE 5. EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT AND ENROLLMENT PERCENTAGES IN HEALDSBURG

BY CENSUS TRACT
Note: This table presents Health, Education, and Income Indices for different census tracts within Healdsburg.

These indices offer a comparative snapshot of well-being across these areas.

Census Tract Less Than High
School (%)
Bachelor's
Degree (%)
Graduate/Professional
Degree (%)
Enrollment
(%)
Old Healdsburg 3.7 51 17.7 75.1
North Healdsburg 5.9 44.6 14.4 72.8
Central Healdsburg 10 35.4 14.8 82.2
• North Healdsburg: While still relatively high compared to national averages, North Healdsburg exhibits slightly lower educational attainment levels than Old Healdsburg. The percentage of residents with a Bachelor's or Graduate/Professional degree is lower, and the percentage without a high school diploma is slightly higher.

This suggests that residents in North Healdsburg may encounter barriers to accessing or completing higher education, potentially limiting their economic opportunities and overall well-being.
• Central Healdsburg: This neighborhood presents the most concerning picture regarding educational attainment. It has the lowest percentage of residents with a Bachelor's degree and the highest percentage without a high school diploma. This disparity raises concerns about the quality of education and support systems available to residents in Central Healdsburg. It also suggests that residents may face significant challenges in pursuing higher education or even completing high school, potentially perpetuating cycles of economic hardship and limiting social mobility.

These stark differences in educational attainment across Healdsburg's neighborhoods underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions and investments to address these inequities.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
11 Racial and Ethnic Disparities
Analyzing well-being across Healdsburg's three census tracts – North Healdsburg, Central Healdsburg, and Old Healdsburg – reveals disparities that may disproportionately impact specific racial and ethnic groups. For instance, North Healdsburg, which has the lowest scores across health and education, also has a higher concentration of Latine residents. This suggests that Latine residents in this area may face greater challenges in accessing healthcare, educational opportunities, and also economic resources.

Furthermore, Central Healdsburg, with its lower income index despite strong health and education indices, may also reflect disparities experienced by specific racial or ethnic groups. A deeper investigation into the demographic composition of each census tract, alongside the well-being indicators, can shed light on potential racial and ethnic disparities that require targeted interventions.

This analysis of Healdsburg reveals a community rich in diversity and history, but also marked by socioeconomic disparities and unequal access to resources across its neighborhoods. Recognizing these disparities is crucial for creating a truly inclusive and equitable Multicultural Center.

Median Earnings
Median earnings provide a stark illustration of the economic disparities that exist between Healdsburg's neighborhoods. These figures shed light on the financial realities faced by residents in different areas and underscore the need for targeted economic development initiatives (See Table 6).
• North Healdsburg: Has the highest median earnings ($42,060), indicating a higher level of economic prosperity in this area.
• Old Healdsburg: Follows closely with median earnings of $41,770, suggesting a similar level of economic well-being.
• Central Healdsburg: Reports the lowest median earnings ($34,926), indicating a potential need for economic development and support in this neighborhood.

Understanding these economic disparities is crucial for community planning and resource allocation in Healdsburg. By recognizing these variations, the community can strive to ensure that all residents, regardless of their neighborhood, have the opportunity to thrive and enjoy a high quality of life.]
TABLE 6. MEDIAN EARNINGS PER CENSUS TRACT
Census Tract Median Earnings
Central Healdsburg $34,926
Old Healdsburg $41,770
North Healdsburg $42,060
Note: Table 6 presents the median earnings for the three census tracts in Healdsburg. North Healdsburg has the highest median earnings ($42,060), followed by Old Healdsburg ($41,770). Central Healdsburg has the lowest median earnings ($34,926). These figures indicate a disparity in income levels across different areas of the city.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
12 Figure 1. Survey Card Structure, see also Appendix B.

Methodology
Multicultural Center in their own words. This method facilitated broad participation and captured a wide range of perspectives (See Figure 1).

Listening Sessions: Recognizing the value of in-depth dialogue, the project conducted 8 listening sessions in diverse community settings between January and October 2024. These sessions fostered open conversations and allowed for a deeper exploration of community needs and aspirations. See Appendix A for the list of protocol questions that guided the conversation.

This multi-faceted approach, involving 129 participants, ensured that diverse voices, including those from potentially marginalized groups, were heard and valued.

This photo depicts On the Margins’ listening session at Alliance Medical Center The Healdsburg Multicultural Center Project was deeply committed to incorporating the community's voice at every stage. To achieve this goal, the project adopted a mixed-methods approach grounded in Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) principles. This ensured that the community's needs and aspirations not only were considered but actively shaped the research questions, focus, and ultimate direction of the HMCP.

To gather rich and comprehensive data, the project employed two primary methods:

Survey Cards: These cards provided a structured yet open-ended format, allowing community members to express their thoughts, ideas, and priorities for the Healdsburg Data Collection: A Community-Driven Approach

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
13 Data Analysis: A Multi-Dimensional Perspective
A robust mixed-methods approach, integrating both quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques, was employed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the community's vision for the Healdsburg Multicultural Center. This multi-faceted approach ensured that the findings were both data-driven and deeply rooted in the lived experiences and aspirations of community members.

Quantitative Analysis:
• Text Mining: Advanced computational text mining techniques were applied to analyze the survey card responses. This involved leveraging sophisticated algorithms to sift through the text data, identify key words, phrases, and recurring themes, and ultimately quantify the most frequently expressed needs and priorities. This approach provided a valuable overview of the prevalent topics and concerns within the community.

Qualitative Analysis:
• Thematic Analysis: A rigorous
qualitative methodology known as
thematic analysis was employed to
delve deeper into the meaning behind
the community's input. This involved a
systematic process of reviewing both
the survey card responses and detailed
notes from the listening sessions to
identify, analyze, and report patterns
(themes) within the data. This approach
facilitated a critical and systemic
inquiry, allowing the researchers to
uncover the underlying meanings,
beliefs, and values expressed by
community members, providing rich
context to the quantitative findings.

TABLE 7. STEP BY STEP DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS (PICKRELL & DOMINGUEZ, 2024)

1. Careful Data Entry and Cleaning:
○ All survey responses were meticulously typed into a spreadsheet, ensuring accuracy and correcting any typos or grammar mistakes.
○ Responses were sorted by language (English or Spanish) to ensure clear understanding. ○ To protect participant privacy, any identifying information was removed.

2. Analyzing the Data:
○ Quantitative analysis: Specialized computer programs were used to analyze word frequency, phrase frequency, and recurring themes. Demographic data was also analyzed to ensure representation.
○ Qualitative analysis: Responses were thoroughly reviewed to identify common themes and patterns. Computer programs were used to create visual representations of the data, such as word clouds and network diagrams, to aid in understanding the overall picture.

3. Text Mining (Using Computers to Find Meaning in Words):
○ A Python script was used to analyze the text in the survey responses. ○ English and Spanish responses were separated.
○ Common word pairs (bigrams) were identified in each language. ○ Word clouds were created to visualize frequently mentioned words and ideas. ○ Word types (nouns, verbs, adjectives) were analyzed to understand expression styles. ○ Network diagrams were created to visualize connections between different ideas. ○ Topic modeling was used to discover the main topics emerging from the responses.

The photograph depicts the researcher alongside
the results of the analysis. The design mandates
are displayed on the right, while a word cloud
visualization of the survey responses is featured on
the left.
• Demographic Calculations: Standard statistical software (e.g., Excel) was utilized for demographic calculations, providing a clear picture of the community's composition and needs.

By combining these analytical approaches, the HMCP gained a multi-dimensional perspective and a nuanced understanding of the community's vision for the Healdsburg Multicultural Center. This ensured that the final recommendations were not only data-driven but also deeply rooted in the lived experiences and aspirations of the community, ultimately contributing to a more relevant and impactful Healdsburg Multicultural Center.

A summary of the survey card analysis procedure is described in Table 7 below:

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
14 Conclusions from Survey Cards and Listening Sessions In conclusion, the eight listening sessions proved instrumental in capturing the authentic voice of the Healdsburg community. Through meticulous documentation and careful analysis of the qualitative data by Corazón Healdsburg, Alliance Medical Center, and On the Margins, recurring themes and priorities emerged, crystallizing into the "10 Design Mandates." These mandates are:

1. Multi-generational Spaces for Movement and Play: Spaces designed for physical wellbeing for all ages, including multipurpose sports fields, exercise areas, and play spaces for children and youth.

2. Community Kitchen/Cafeteria: A community-led kitchen/cafeteria fostering culinary skills, shared meal preparation, and access to healthy, affordable food.

3. Collaborative Mural Art: Partnerships with Healdsburg artists and community members, especially from LGBTQIA+ and BIPOC communities, to co-create murals celebrating cultural diversity and empowerment.

4. Sensory-Aware Design: Spaces offering varying levels of sensory engagement, from vibrant and stimulating to quiet and calming, to accommodate individual preferences.

5. Spaces for Creative Expression: Dedicated areas for community-led arts, crafts, and music, emphasizing cultural traditions and the therapeutic benefits of creativity.

6. Environmental Justice: A commitment to sustainability, featuring native plants, traditional medicinal plants, and edible gardens. The design should reclaim and restore natural spaces historically taken from BIPOC communities.

7. Lifelong Learning Hub: A center for intergenerational learning and career development, offering academic support, life skills training, career/technical education, and resources for literacy, GED preparation, and certifications.

8. Community Gathering Spaces: Flexible spaces designed to foster community interaction, gatherings, and cross-cultural connection. Support for community-led events, celebrations, and shared activities.

9. Computer Access and Digital Literacy: On-site computers and technology education, including coding classes, accessible to all community members.

10. Access, Autonomy, Accountability, and Justice: The center must be physically and financially accessible to all, with community voices central to its design and operation. A commitment to mutual accountability and justice for underserved communities in Healdsburg.

Findings, Conclusions, and Confirmations
Demographics
Listening session participants were diverse, with over 90% identifying as Latine, and representation from Mixtec, Triqui, White, and Asian/Pacific Islander communities. The majority of respondents were female (65%), with 34% identifying as male and 1% as non-binary. Almost all respondents who provided their location indicated a zip code of 95448 or wrote in "Healdsburg."
The listening session participants were also diverse in age, with the largest group being middleaged adults between 40 and 50 years old, but also included representation from young adults, seniors, and various cultural backgrounds (See Figure 2).

Figure 2. Age Histogram

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
15 Preferred Location
When asked about the ideal location for the Healdsburg Multicultural Center, participants overwhelmingly favored integrating it into the existing Healdsburg Community Center at 1557 Healdsburg Ave, Healdsburg, CA 95448.

This strong preference stemmed from several factors:
• Familiarity and Comfort: The existing Community Center is already a familiar and welcoming space for many residents, fostering a sense of comfort and belonging. • Increased Feasibility: Participants recognized that leveraging the existing site would make the project more feasible and efficient, allowing for a quicker realization of the Multicultural Center.
• Centralized Community Hub: Integrating the Multicultural Center into the existing Community Center creates a centralized hub for diverse programs and services, promoting greater access and community interaction.

By choosing this location, the community envisions a vibrant and inclusive space that builds upon existing resources and strengthens community connections.

Design Workshops Based on Design Mandates
To bridge the gap between community aspirations and architectural realities, the design team orchestrated two interactive workshops. The first workshop, held in September 2024, served as a platform to gather community feedback on potential architectural designs and delve deeper into how the community's vision could be seamlessly integrated into the existing Healdsburg Community Center site.

A key component of this workshop was the "dot polling" activity, which allowed residents to visually express their preferences for various design options by placing colored stickers on posters. This interactive exercise provided the architects with immediate, quantifiable feedback, giving them valuable insights to guide their decision-making.

Building on the foundation established in the first workshop, the second workshop in November 2024 delved into specific architectural and landscape design elements. Residents actively participated in a site planning activity, generating creative ideas for the center's layout, functionality, and aesthetic appeal.

This photo is from the initial design workshop held at the Healdsburg Community Center.

The images showcase a range of design possibilities explored by the architecture firms for this project.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
16 2. 3D Model Perspective: To further enhance visualization and refine the design, the architects are creating a 3D model of the Healdsburg Multicultural Center. This digital representation allows them to:
• Explore Aesthetics: Experiment with different architectural styles, materials, and color palettes to achieve an aesthetically pleasing and culturally relevant design. • Evaluate Functionality: Assess the flow and functionality of spaces, ensuring they meet the intended purpose and accommodate various activities and events. • Communicate Effectively: Share a tangible representation of the design with stakeholders, facilitating communication and fostering a shared understanding of the project's vision.

By meticulously crafting the master plan concept and 3D model perspective, the architects are taking concrete steps to bring the community's dream for the Healdsburg Multicultural Center to life.

Future Directions
The architects are currently immersed in the process of translating the community's aspirations into tangible design concepts for the Healdsburg Multicultural Center. They are diligently analyzing the wealth of feedback gathered from the two community workshops, paying close attention to the preferences expressed through the "dot polling" activity. This valuable input is shaping their decision-making as they refine the design and ensure it aligns with the community's vision.

Their current focus is twofold:

1. Master Plan Concept: The architects are developing a comprehensive master plan that outlines the overall design and layout of the center. This preliminary plan encompasses various aspects, including:
• Building Placement: Strategically positioning the main building and any auxiliary structures to optimize flow and functionality.
• Parking and Accessibility: Designing accessible parking areas and pathways that cater to individuals of all abilities.
• Walkways and Circulation: Creating a pedestrian-friendly environment with clearly defined walkways and intuitive circulation patterns.
• Landscaping and Outdoor Spaces: Integrating green spaces, native plants, and gathering areas that foster a sense of community and connection with nature. • Amenities and Features: Incorporating key amenities such as the community kitchen, multi-purpose spaces, and technology areas in a way that maximizes their usability and accessibility.

This master plan concept serves as a blueprint for the project, guiding decision-making and ensuring that the final design effectively meets the diverse needs of the community.

The image shows one groups’ site plan that influenced the Master Plan Concept.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

VISIONING SESSIONS

TWO PUBLIC WORKSHOPS LEAD BY GORING & STRAJA ARCHITECTS AND CARDUCCI ASSOCIATES IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER, 2024

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
18 Workshop #01
Drawing from the Listening Sessions
As was previously mentioned in the On the Margins (OTM) report, the firms of Goring & Straja Architects and Carducci Associates (Design Team), were engaged to further the community’s vision for the Healdsburg Multicultural Center. The Design Team’s intent was to build upon the the information and data gathered at the eight“Listening Sessions by introducing two “Visioning Session” Workshops to engage with the community directly. OTM provided the Design Team with an “Architect Design Suggestions Report” which summarized the data collected at the previous Listening Sessions to assist them with preparing for the Workshops.

After reviewing the report, the Design Team determined that there were eight distinct Programmatic Spaces the community described for their ideal Multicultural Center:

The mural above is currently displayed in the west courtyard of the existing community center. The participatory and community oriented nature of it serves as inspiration for the HMCP process. • Quiet Study / Reading Spaces
• Music Room
• Life Skills / Career Support Spaces
• Multipurpose Room
• Community Kitchen
• Arts & Crafts Room
• Study Spaces
• Classrooms
The Design Team developed image boards consisting of photographs they felt could best describe options for each of the eight Programmatic Spaces. In addition, they developed image boards representing the ten Design Mandates which also had multiple photographic images of options for each of the Design Mandates.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
19 In addition to Dot Polling, a “Comments Board” was made available to solicit input from the community to further describe their vision for the Multicultural Center not be represented in the Programmatic Spaces or Design Mandates image boards.

Site Context and Dot Polling
Workshop #01 was held on October 16, 2024 at the Healdsburg Community Center Multipurpose Room. It was attended by over 50 members of the community. Bi-lingual materials and a translator were provided at the Workshop to ensure inclusion. A Context Map, Existing Conditions Plan and Plan of the Existing Community Center were presented to orientate the community with the facility. After review of the eight Programmatic Spaces and ten Design Mandate Programming Imagery Boards, the community was provided with colored “dots” and asked to place them on the images (photographs) of Spaces / Mandates that resonate with them. It was a lively exercise and participants enjoyed the opportunity to “vote” for the photographs that best represented their vision for the future Multicultural Center. It should be noted that several participants would gather around a specific board and discuss as a group why a specific photograph was the best representation.

The following page shows the context map of Healdsburg that was printed at large scale for reference during Visioning Session 1, to illustrate relationships between the existing Community Center site and other public amenities and points of interest within Healdsburg.

The mural above is currently
displayed in the west courtyard
of the existing community
center. The participatory and
community oriented nature of it
serves as inspiration for the
HMCP process.

Above: Three participants pose during the activity.

Top left: Landscape architect William Fee joins
attendees on an optional walk of the Community
Center site prior to the workshop.

Top Right: The number of stickers an image
receives illustrates how important the ideas within
it are to the community who voted.

Opposite: Attendees participate in dot polling.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore) 0 1000 2000 4000
N
2 M I L E | M I L L A
1 M I L E | M I L L A
1 1 / 2 M I L E | M I L L A
1 /
4 M
I L E | M I L L A
1 /
2 M I L E | M I L L A
5 MINUTE WALK
5 M I N U T O S D E C A M I N ATA

1.5 MINUTES BY BIKE

1.5 MINUTOS EN BICICLETA
10 MINUTE WALK
1 0 M I N U T O S D E C A M I N ATA
3 MINUTES BY BIKE
3 MINUTOS EN BICICLETA
20 MINUTE WALK
2 0 M I N U T O S D E C A M I N ATA
6 MINUTES BY BIKE
6 MINUTOS EN BICICLETA
30 MINUTE WALK
3 0 M I N U T O S D E C A M I N ATA
9 MINUTES BY BIKE
9 MINUTOS EN BICICLETA
40 MINUTE WALK
4 0 M I N U T O S D E C A M I N ATA
12 MINUTES BY BIKE
12 MINUTOS EN BICICLETA

HEALDSBURG PLAZA

PLAZA DE HEALDSBURG

PROJECT SITE

SITIO DEL PROYECTO
Healdsburg Context Map 20

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
21 Existing Community Center Site Plan The site plan below was presented as a 36” x 72” print for Visioning
Sessions 1 and 2, to show the full
spread of the long and narrow site of
the existing Community Center.

HEALDSBURG MULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DEL PROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARD NO. 00 1557 HEALDSBURG AVENUE
WORKSHOP 1

1.5 MILE | MILLAT O H E A L D S B U R G P L A Z A A LA PLAZA DE HEALDSBURG5/16 MILE | MILLA6 M I N U T E W A L K 6 M I N U T O S D E C A M I N ATA 2 M I N U T E B I K E R I D E 2 MINUTOS EN BICICLETA1/4 MILE | MILLA5 M I N U T E W A L K 5 MINUTOS DE CAMINATA1 . 5 M I N U T E B I K E R I D E 1.5 MINUTOS EN BICICLETA1/8 MILE | MILLA2 M I N U T E W A L K 2 MINUTOS DE CAMINATA1 M I N U T E B I K E R I D E 1 MINUTO EN BICICLETA0 MILE | MILLA

YOU ARE HERE
ESTÁS AQUÍ

U N D E V E L O P E D A R E A
ÁREA NO DESARROLLADA
( E ) R E D W O O D S

SECUOYAS EXISTENTES

S O C C E R F I E L D
CAMPO DE FÚTBOL

G R A S S S P O R T S F I E L D
CAMPO DE CÉSPED

B A S E B A L L I N F I E L D

W I T H B A C K S T O P
I N F I E L D D E B É I S B O L

CON REJA O MALLA
PARKING (41)

ESTACIONAMIENTO

E X I T
SALIDA
( E ) R E D W O O D S

SECUOYAS EXISTENTES

E N T R Y

ENTRADA

O U T F A L L

SALIDA DE DRENAJE

P L A Y A R E A
ÁREA DE JUEGOS

I N F O R M A L P A R K I N G A R E A
Á R E A D E E S T A C I O N A M I E N T O

INFORMAL

B A L L W A L L S

P A R E D E S P A R A
PELOTA

B A S K E T B A L L C O U R T S

CANCHAS DE BALONCESTO

FOSS CREEK
OFFICES | OFICINAS

S E R V I C E G A T E

PUERTA DE SERVICIO

F O R M E R G A R D E N
EXJARDÍN

Y A R D
PATIO

R E A R E N T R Y

E N T R A D A

TRASERA
D A Y
CARE
G U A R D E R Í A

INFANTIL
PR PR S T A F F |

PERSONAL

PR PR PR

PR PR O F F I C E

OFICINA

O F F I C E

OFICINA

M E E T I N G

R O O M
S A L Ó N D E

REUNIONES

AMPHITHEATER

ANFITEATRO

M U L T I P U R P O S E R O O M

S A L A D E U S O S
MÚLTIPLES

E X I T
SALIDA

T R A F F I C L I G H T C R O S S W A L K
SEMÁFORO PASO PEATONAL

E X I T
SALIDA

E N T R Y

ENTRADA

C R O S S W A L K

PASO PEATONAL

M A I N E N T R Y

ENTRADA PRINCIPAL

L O A D I N G Z O N E

Z O N A D E C A R G A Y

DESCARGA
P A R K I N G ( 4 3 )

ESTACIONAMIENTO

A C C E S S I B L E P A R K I N G

E S T A C I O N A M I E N T O

ACCESIBLE

E N D O F P A T H

FIN DEL CAMINO L O W P O I N T

PUNTO BAJO DE DRENAJE L O W P O I N T

P U N T O B A J O D E

DRENAJE
~158.50 ~156.00
~154.00
~152.50
~152.00
~154.00
~149.00 ~153.50
~147.00 ~ 5 %
~154.00
~150.00 ~155.00
~145.00
~149.50
~146.25
0 . 8 %
1 . 5 %

K I T C H E N
COCINA
R

GROVE ST

HEALDSBURG AVE

HEALDSBURG AVE

PAUL WITTKE DR

F O S S C R E E K P A T H W A Y

CAMINO DE FOSS CREEK

O A K G R O V E

A P A R T M E N T S

D E P A R T A M E N T O S

DE OAK GROVE
04 1”=30’
FOSS

FOSS CREEK
CREEK

B A S E B A L L B A C K S T O P
REJA O MALLA DE BÉISBOL

T R A F F I C L I G H T
SEMÁFORO

C R O S S W A L K

PASO PEATONAL

O U T F A L L

SALIDA DE DRENAJE
( E ) R E D W O O D S

SECUOYAS EXISTENTES

F O S S C R E E K P A T H W A Y

CAMINO DE FOSS CREEK

R R T R A C K S
VÍAS DEL TREN
R
R
R

C R O S S W A L K

PASO PEATONAL

R R T R A C K S
VÍAS DEL TREN

O U T F A L L

SALIDA DE DRENAJE
R
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN | PLAN DE CONDICIONES EXISTENTES 0 30 60 120 N

F O S S C R E E K P A T H W A Y

CAMINO DE FOSS CREEK

S T O R M D R A I N E A S E M E N T & S T O R M W A T E R

A C C E S O P A R A D R E N A J E D E A G U A S D E
LLUVIA
LEGEND

V E H I C U L A R E N T R Y & E X I T

ENTRADA Y SALIDA VEHICULAR

P R O G R A M R O O M

SALA DE PROGRAMAS

R E S T R O O M
BAÑO

R R T R A C K S
VÍAS DEL TREN

T R A F F I C L I G H T
SEMÁFORO
2 0 ’ W I D E F I R E R O A D
C A M I N O C O N T R A I N C E N D I O S D E 2 0 P I E S

DE ANCHO
PR
R

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
22 Existing Site Conditions
The existing Healdsburg Community Center is owned and operated by the City of Healdsburg.

It was a former elementary school. It is adjacent to Foss Creek and the Foss Creek Bikeway, an abandoned railroad right-of-way that connects to Central Healdsburg. The Community Center fronts Healdsburg Avenue. The site is bordered by mature trees on the south and east. West of the site is a large grove of mature native oak trees in the Foss Creek riparian corridor. Between Foss Creek and the site is the abandoned railway and the Foss Creek Bikeway. The site is about 10 acres and includes three distinct areas:

1. a central campus of one-story buildings,

2. south of the campus buildings is a multiuse hardcourt with basketball courts, a children’s play area, an abandoned community garden, and an adjacent multiuse natural grass sports field that accommodates baseball and soccer,

3. and a small undeveloped area in the north portion of the site The central campus buildings are occupied by the City of Healdsburg Community Services Department, Corazón Healdsburg, Alliance Medical Center and a YMCA childcare facility.

The campus also includes a Multipurpose Building with a kitchen, a community meeting room and several classrooms that are available for rental use. The buildings and rooms are connected by covered outdoor corridors. Situated between the various rooms and covered outdoor corridors are three mostly paved courtyards. The courtyard next to the Multipurpose Room includes a sunken amphitheater. The two other courtyards are unprogrammed and have few trees or plants.

Area 3: view of undeveloped north area; looking south from start of Foss Creek Bikeway at Grove St.

Area 2: view of vast blacktop and soccer fields south of central campus, looking south.

Area 1: view of entrance on north side of central campus, looking south.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
23 FF 155.7
FF 155.6
FF 155.6

DRIVEWAY CURB CUT

CROSS WALK
TRASH

ENCLOSURE

CONCRETE WALL
GATE
C
FF 155.6
FF 154.4
153.7
150.3
153.7
149.0

GATE GATE
FF 154.4
FF 154.25
FF 154.4
FF 155.6
FF 154.35
154.35
FF 154.4
FF 154.4
154.25
154.35

SIDEWALK
20' W DI E STORM

DRA NI EASEMENT

CURB & GUTTER

SIDEWALK
153
153
156
155
154
154
154
153
153
153
152
152
152
152
152
151
151
151
150
150
JP
JP
HB
FH
FH
FH
0 32 48 64 FT
M
D B
N
O
C
H
P
Q
R
S
T
U
A
B
T
T
G
I

G G F F
J
J
ROOM 1
ROOM 2
ROOM 3
ROOM 4
ROOM 5
ROOM 9
ROOM 10
ROOM 11
ROOM 8
ROOM 7
ROOM 6
ROOM
12 ROOM
13 ROOM
14 ROOM
15 ROOM
16 S
S
S
R
R
V
W
V
E
J
M
M I
L
L
L
L
L
K L
E

YOU ARE HERE
USTED ESTÁ AQUÍ

EXISTING USES
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
Reception / Recepción
City of Healdsburg Community Services/Parks &
Recreation Staff Offices /
Oficinas de personal de servicios
comunitarios/parques y recreación de la ciudad
de Healdsburg
Conference & Break Room / Sala de
Conferencias y Descanso
Community Meeting Room / Sala de Reuniones
Comunitarias
Temporary Regional Library / Biblioteca Regional
temporal
Alliance Medical Center / Clínica Alianza
Corazón Healdsburg
City of Healdsburg Staff Break Room / Sala de
Descanso del Personal de la Ciudad de
Healdsburg
Santa Rosa Junior College / Colegio Santa Rosa
YWCA Childcare Program / Programa de cuidado
infantil de la YWCA
Art room / Sala de arte
Summer camp (seasonal) / Campamento de
verano (estacional)
Multipurpose room / Salón Multiusos
Kitchen / Cocina
Mechanical / Sala de Máquinas
Staff Restroom / Baño de Empleados
Child Restroom / Baño de Niños
Public Restroom / Baño Público
Storage Container / Contenedor de
Almacenamiento
Courtyard / Patio
Amphitheater / Anfiteatro
Childcare Playground / Patio de juegos de niños
Former Community Garden / Antiguo jardín
comunitario

HEALDSBURG MULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER
PLAN OF EXISTING COMMUNITY CENTER | PLANO DEL CENTRO COMMUNITARIO EXISTENTE SCALE:
10/16/24
1" = 10'-0"
DATE:

BOARD NO. 06 1557 HEALDSBURG AVENUE
WORKSHOP 1
Existing Community Center
Enlarged Plan
This drawing was printed at large
scale (1” = 10’-0”) for reference
during Visioning Session 1. Both of
the Visioning Sessions were held in
the Multipurpose Room, indicated
by a red star.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
24 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - #1 of 8 total: 67
Program: Community Kitchen
Tulum outdoor kitchen 26.5
Hackney kids kitchen       25.5
outdoor banquet dining 4
grandma cooking 4
industrial open kitchen 4
Nordic cafeteria3

INDOOR/OUTDOOR, FAMILY

FRIENDLY, OPEN, LOTS OF

STORAGE
Rank - #2 of 8 total: 60
Program: Music Room
CDMX dance hall 18
TEDx-esque bean bags 14
black and white rehearsal room 10
red vibey recording studio 10
other vibey recording studio 5
dugout practice room 1
frames and guitar 1
mobiles and xylophones 1

PLAYFUL LIGHT/MAT'L

INSTALLATION, LARGE OPEN

SPACE, CONVERTIBLE FOR

DANCE /PERFORMANCE /

REHEARSAL /LISTENING,

PERFORMANCE ACOUSTICS

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
25 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - #3 of 8 total: 38
Program: Study Spaces
tech computer lab 24
plywood booths 9
colorful Wework cafe 3
japandi cubicles 1
banquet cafe 1

FOCUSED ATMOSPHERE, TASK

LIGHTING, FLEXIBLE TABLES/BAR
TOPS, OPTION TO COLLAB, HIGHTECH COMPATIBLE, SOME

DESKTOP STATIONS
Rank - Tied for #4 of 8 total: 35
Program: Classrooms
indoor/outdoor open classroom 25
techy kid classroom 3
exposed brick with clerestory windows 1
white board/mod furniture 2
brise soleil with green desks 4

LIGHT, OPEN, MODULAR/

FLEXIBLE, OPEN UP TO

OUTDOOR

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
26 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - Tied for #4 of 8 total: 35
Program: Multipurpose Room
basketball pavilion 9
colorful glass lobby 7
ping pong 7
indoor hillside 5
glass presentation 3
colorful fabric 2
nighttime pavilion 2

COLORFUL, INDOOR/OUTDOOR OR
AT LEAST LOTS OF NAT'L LIGHT +

VIEWS, GAMES, PRIORITIZE

PLAYFULNESS
Rank - Tied for #6 of 8 total: 31
Program: Life Skills/Career Support Spaces
CDMX concrete computer lab 17
materials lab with glass ceiling 6
sewing lab 4
‘millennial pink’ board room 2
chat circle mural 2

LIGHT, OPEN SPACE, HIGH

TECH-COMPATIBLE/ PRIORITY

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
27 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - Tied for #6 of 8 total: 31
Program: Arts & Crafts Room
sewing lab with floor mural 11
loom 7
colorful coloring table 4
techy maker space 3
peg board maker space 3
clay studio with large windows 2
double height art studio 1

COLORFUL, FIBER-ARTS

FOCUSED, FLEXIBLE/

CONVERTIBLE
Rank - #8 of 8 total: 27
Program: Quiet Study/Reading Spaces
hammock 13
university library cubbies 5
bean bags 3
space age booth 3
techy research library 2
curtain cutout 1

OPTION TO GET REAL COMFY,

PLAYFUL FURNITURE, PARTIAL

PARTITIONS

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
28 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - #1 OUT OF 10 total: 91
Design Mandate 1: Multipurpose, Intergenerational
Movement Spaces
zumba          30
basketball           16
Don Biddle play structure      11
colored asphalt with activities    11
Marina fitness blue square     9
yoga               9
lawn/field           7
music play             3
swings and playground       3
nature play             1
pickleball & Don Biddle hammocks 0

ACTIVE, COLORFUL

PROGRAMMING, MOVING
YOUR BODY, MULTIGENERATIONAL ACTIVITIES
Rank - #2 OUT OF 10 total: 57
Design Mandate 8: Community Building Spaces
outdoor nightlife group event the barn 31
stage with community watching 12
movie watching 11
outdoor colorful plaza parking lot 5
colorful plaza 5
community food table 2
outdoor food event 1
outdoor seating blue & yellow chairs 0

PARTY, NIGHTLIFE, LIVELY,

COLORFUL, VIBRANT,

MINGLING, COMMUNITY,

ENGAGING

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
29 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - #3 OUT OF 10 total: 48
Design Mandate 4: Mixed Sensory Engagement
outdoor seating and stage 16
fountain 10
peaceful shade structure 6
a bunch of activities on blacktop 5
rainbow statement structure 5
hummingbird and bees 4
mosaic water fountain         1
wild planting and seat benches     1
person alone in serene garden     0

LIVELY, LOUD,

STIMULATING, ENGAGING,

MINGLING
Rank - #4 OUT OF 10 total: 42
Design Mandate 5: Arts, Crafts, Music
musicians singing on stage         17
lady with loom     7
classical Mexican fancy dancing      7
community dancing and classical dressing up 4
tiny crafts area for kids          3
cultural indigenous dancing         2
community painting craft night       2
face painting & tribal classic dressing up    0

MUSIC, ROOTS, CLASSIC,

CULTURAL PRIDE,

GENERATIONAL, ART,

HANDS-ON

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
30 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - #5 OUT OF 10 total: 41
Design Mandate 3: Participatory Mural Design
historical mural powerful 15
lady with basket       9
people painting interactive 5
flowers painted 3
flowers on chain link fence 3
cultural pattern colorful sidewalk 3
Healdsburg chainlink fence 1
basket weave ceiling 1
lady screaming fence 1
train track painted sidewalk & LGBTQ+ mural 0

STORYTELLING,

HISTORICAL, MEMORIAL,

CULTURAL PRIDE
Rank - #6 OUT OF 10 total: 39
Design Mandate 2: Community Kitchen and Cafeteria
cultural kitchen/adobe style         11
lush greenery outdoor seating/eating area    8
colorful rainbow outdoor kitchen/seating    6
outdoor picnic/tree canopy           5
outdoor grilling               4
rustic barn outdoor kitchen          3
outdoor produce              1
outdoor market               1
veggie theme outdoor kitchen & tamale making 0

TRADITIONAL, COLORFUL,

PLANTS, TEXTURE,

EXCITING

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
31 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - #7 OUT OF 10 total: 37
Design Mandate 6: Environmental Justice
ethnobotanical garden          21
outdoor educational garden      5
educational signage showing indigenous history
and use of plants      5
learning stewarding from indigenous people 3
community stewarding of native plants 3
pruning plants            0

PLANTS THAT REMIND

THEM OF HOME,

STEWARDING ROOTS,

EDUCATIONAL

IMPORTANCE
Rank - #8 OUT OF 10 total: 33
Design Mandate 7: Multifaceted Educational
Support
outdoor children nature learning     8
outdoor community group session     8
indoor/outdoor hybrid computer space 7
lady weaving basket         5
outdoor library           3
clay brick making 2
historian/docent talking about trees 0

DEDICATION TO

LEARNING, CULTURAL

PRACTICES AND

IMPORTANCE

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
32 Dot Polling Data Analysis Process
Rank - #9 OUT OF 10 total: 32
Design Mandate 10: Prioritize Access, Autonomy,
Accountability and Justice
bilingual signage/walking path   14
ada accessible planters and engagement in
surroundings         8
land acknowledgement 6
walking loop 3
ada accessible path 1

WALKING, ACCESSIBLE

WAYFINDING AND

SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBILE

PHYSICAL SPACES,

ACKNOWLEDGING THE

LAND AND ITS PEOPLE
Rank - #10 OUT OF 10 total: 29
Design Mandate 9: Computer Access and Education
nighttime view of solar seating kids after school 11
computer solar orange bench 7
computer station surrounded by nature and flowers 7
outdoor charging station 2
bench with charging pedestal 2
white high tech outdoor computer space 0

CAN BE PLACED

ANYWHERE, DEDICATION

TO LEARNING,

ACCESSIBILITY TO

CHARGING SOURCES,

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
33 The hand-written comments left on the open-ended comments board are as follows:

Dot Polling — Comments Board

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE ARTS AND CRAFTS, BUT THEY BRING IN PEOPLE FROM DIFFERENT CULTURES AND WE GET TO DO DIFFERENT TYPE OF THING. LIKE BASKET WEAVING OR

JUST AN ARTIST WHO WANTS TO SHOW PEOPLE HOW TO DRAW
SALÓN PARA BAILE - FOLKLÓRICO, HIP HOP, DISCO, ETC.

HOLIDAY/COMMUNITY EVENTS, EVERYONE COMES TOGETHER. EX: EASTER OR

HALLOWEEN
I WANT THERE TO JUST BE HANGOUT SPOTS TOO; I WANT THERE TO BE RECREATIONAL

ACTIVITIES LIKE GAMING ROOMS, POOL TYPE OF CLUB THING, STUFF LIKE THAT

POP UP FOOD TRUCK EXPERIENCE

I WOULD LIKE THEME PARK
TEMAZCAL BAÑOS DE VAPOR

TEMAZCAL

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING LIKE INDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES OR LIKE A TRAINING/ GYM CENTER; AS FOR THE GENERAL LOOK OF EVERYTHING I DON'T WANT IT TO LOOK TOO MODERN. I WANT IT TO HAVE A SORT OF RELAXED FEELING BUT ALSO BE VIBRANT Note: These comments are shown in the language they were written in.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
34 Workshop #02
Results Revealed
Workshop #02 was also at the Healdsburg Community Center Multipurpose Room on November 24, 2024. After a brief recap, the Design Team presented the Dot Polling results for the Programmatic Spaces and Design Mandate images. The standout images were the most popular images that were reviewed and selected at the first Visioning Session. Each Programmatic Space was represented in the Dot Polling Results board. Similar to the Word Clouds, the standout images were increased or decreased in size according to the number of dot polling votes a specific image received. What emerged from this exercise was the opportunity for the Design Team to define “Commonalities” amongst the eight Programmatic Spaces and ten Design Mandates:

The entrance to the existing Community Center at 1557 Healdsburg Ave.

Programmatic Space Commonalities:
• Close Relationship between Indoor &
Outdoor
• Family Oriented
• Traditional Building Techniques &
Materials
• Fiber Arts priority for Craft Space
• Playfulness, Festivity
• Flexibility of Space & Technology
Design Mandate Commonalities:
• Food, Music and Dance
• Exercise in Natural Setting “Green
Exercise”
• Access to Nature and Ethnobotanical
Plants
• Education and Access to Technology
• Multigenerational and Traditional
• Art Representing Cultural Heritage

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
35 DOT POLLING RESULTS / RESULTADOS DE LA ENCUESTA DE STICKERS/PEGATINAS Project: Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center / Proyecto: Centro Comunitario Multicultural de Healdsburg Subject: Workshop 2 / Contenido: Taller 2
Date: November 25th, 2024 6:00 - 7:30 pm / Fecha: 25 de noviembre de 2024 6:00 - 7:30 PM Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center Workshop 2 — Dot Polling Results

HEALDSBURG MULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER
DOT POLLING RESULTS | RESULTADOS DE LA ENCUESTA DE STICKERS/PEGATINAS SCALE:
11/25/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARD NO. 01 1557 HEALDSBURG AVENUE
WORKSHOP 2
PROGRAMS | PROGRAMAS:
1 1
2 3
4 7
5 6
8 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 COMMUNITY KITCHEN |

COCINA COMUNITARIA
MUSIC ROOM | SALA DE MÚSICA
STUDY SPACE | ESPACIOS DE ESTUDIO
CLASSROOM | AULAS
MULTIPURPOSE SPACE |
SALÓN DE USOS MÚLTIPLES
LIFE SKILLS/CAREER SUPPORT SPACE |

ESPACIOS DE APOYO PROFESIONAL/

HABILIDADES PARA LA VIDA
ARTS & CRAFTS SPACE |

SALA DE ARTES Y MANUALIDADES
QUIET STUDY/READING SPACE |

ESPACIOS TRANQUILOS DE

ESTUDIO/LECTURA
THE STANDOUT IMAGES |
LAS IMÁGENES DESTACADAS:

CLOSE RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN INDOOR & OUTDOOR

FAMILY ORIENTED

TRADITIONAL BUILDING

TECHNIQUES & MATERIALS

FIBER ARTS PRIORITY FOR

CRAFT SPACE

PLAYFULNESS, FESTIVITY

FLEXIBILITY OF SPACE &

TECHNOLOGY

FLEXIBILIDAD DE ESPACIO Y
TECNOLOGÍA
DIVERSIÓN, FESTIVIDAD

LAS ARTES DE FIBRA,

PRIORIDAD PARA EL ESPACIO

DE MANUALIDADES
TÉCNICAS Y MATERIALES DE
CONSTRUCCIÓN

TRADICIONALES

ORIENTADO A LA FAMILIA
RELACIÓN CERCANA ENTRE

INTERIOR Y EXTERIOR
COMMONALITIES | PUNTOS COMUNES:

Architectural themes consistent across
much of your feedback.

Temas arquitectónicos consistentes en
gran parte de sus comentarios.

Shown are the most popular images from each
of the programmatic imagery boards reviewed
during the first Visioning Session.

Se muestran las imágenes más polulares de cada
uno de los tableros de emisión programática
revisados durante la primera sesión de visión.

Listed in order of most to least dots received
during Visioning Session 1 Dot Polling.

Enumerados en orden de mayor a menor
número de puntos recibidos durante la
encuesta de puntos de la sesión de visión 1.

THE LARGER THE IMAGE, THE MORE

DOTS IT RECEIVED INDIVIDUALLY
CUANTO MÁS GRANDE LA IMAGEN,
MÁS PUNTOS RECIBIÓ

INDIVIDUALMENTE

26.5 DOTS | PUNTOS

25.5 DOTS | PUNTOS
18 DOTS | PUNTOS
25 DOTS | PUNTOS
9 DOTS | PUNTOS 24 DOTS | PUNTOS
17 DOTS | PUNTOS
11 DOTS | PUNTOS
13 DOTS | PUNTOS
ARCHITECTURE | ARQUITECTURA
Dot Polling Results — Programmatic Favored Imagery & Commonalities The presentation board below was printed large format as 36”x72” and
distributed as an 11”x17” handout
to Visioning Session 2 participants.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
36 DOT POLLING RESULTS / RESULTADOS DE LA ENCUESTA DE STICKERS/PEGATINAS Project: Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center / Proyecto: Centro Comunitario Multicultural de Healdsburg Subject: Workshop 2 / Contenido: Taller 2
Date: November 25th, 2024 6:00 - 7:30 pm / Fecha: 25 de noviembre de 2024 6:00 - 7:30 PM Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center LANDSCAPE Workshop 2 — Dot Polling Results COMMONALITIES:

Architectural themes consistent
across much of your feedback

HEALDSBURG MULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITY WELLNESS CENTER

DOT POLLING RESULTS
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARD NO. 01 1557 HEALDSBURG AVENUE
WORKSHOP 1
PROGRAMS:

Listed in order of most to least dots
received during Visioning Session 1
Dot Polling. 1
1 2
3 4
7 5
6 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8

COMMUNITY KITCHEN

MUSIC ROOM

STUDY SPACE

CLASSROOM

MULTIPURPOSE SPACE

LIFE SKILLS/CAREER

SUPPORT SPACE

ARTS & CRAFTS
SPACE

QUIET STUDY/

READING SPACE
The larger the image, the more
dots it received individually.

CLOSE RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN INDOOR &

OUTDOOR

FAMILY ORIENTED

TRADITIONAL

BUILDING

TECHNIQUES AND

MATERIALS

FIBER ARTS PRIORITY

FOR CRAFT SPACE

PLAYFULNESS,

FESTIVITY

FLEXIBILITY OF SPACE
& TECHNOLOGY
THE STANDOUT IMAGES:

Shown are the most popular images
from each of the programmatic
imagery boards reviewed during the
first Visioning Session.
11/25/24 WORKSHOP 2
31 DOTS | 31 PUNTOS
1 3
2 4
5 6
7 8
9 9
8 8
5 8
16 DOTS | 16 PUNTOS
11 DOTS | 11 PUNTOS
11 DOTS | 11 PUNTOS 16 DOTS | 16 PUNTOS 11 DOTS | 11 PUNTOS 17 DOTS | 17 PUNTOS
21 DOTS | 21 PUNTOS
30 DOTS | 30 PUNTOS
15 DOTS | 15 PUNTOS 8 DOTS | 8 PUNTOS
8 DOTS | 8 PUNTOS
11 DOTS | 11 PUNTOS
14 DOTS | 14 PUNTOS

DOT POLLING RESULTS
NTS
02 THE STANDOUT IMAGES | LAS IMÁGENES DESTACADAS:

Shown are the most popular images from each of the programmatic imagery boards reviewed during the first Visioning Session.

Se muestran las imágenes más populares de cada uno de los tableros de imágenes programáticas revisados durante la primera sesión de visión. 1 LARGE COMMUNITY GATHERING PAVILION | GRAN
PABELLÓN DE REUNIÓN COMUNITARIA
(08 COMMUNITY BUILDING SPACES | 08 ESPACIOS PARA EL DESARROLLO

COMUNITARIO)
2 “ZUMBA” MULTIPURPOSE EXERCISE SPACE | ESPACIO DE
EJERCICIO MULTIUSOS “ZUMBA”
(01 MULTIPURPOSE, INTERGENERATIONAL MOVEMENT SPACES | 01 ESPACIOS

MULTIUSOS DE MOVIMIENTO INTERGENERACIONAL)
3 ETHNOBOTANICAL GARDEN | JARDÍN ETNOBOTÁNICO
(06 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE | 06 JUSTICIA AMBIENTAL)
4 MUSIC PERFORMANCE SPACE | ESPACIO DE
INTERPRETACIÓN DE MÚSICA
(05 ARTS, CRAFTS, MUSIC | 05 ARTES, MANUALIDADES, MÚSICA) 5 STAGE AND SEATING | ESCENARIO Y ASIENTOS
(04 MIXED SENSORY ENGAGEMENT | ESTIMULACIÓN SENSORIAL MIXTA) BASKETBALL | BALONCESTO
(01 MULTIPURPOSE, INTERGENERATIONAL MOVEMENT SPACES | 01 ESPACIOS

MULTIUSOS DE MOVIMIENTO INTERGENERACIONAL)
6 HISTORICAL MURAL | MURAL HISTÓRICO
(03 PARTICIPATORY MURAL DESIGN | 03 DISEÑO PARTICIPATIVO DE MURALES) 7 WALKING PATH WITH BILINGUAL SIGNAGE | SENDERO
CON SEÑALIZACIÓN BILINGÜE
(10 PRIORITIZE ACCESS, AUTONOMY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND JUSTICE | 10 PRIORIZAR EL ACCESO, LA AUTONOMÍA, LA RESPONSABILIDAD Y LA JUSTICIA) 8 PLAY STRUCTURE AND PAVEMENT ACTIVITIES |

ACTIVIDADES DE ESTRUCTURA DE JUEGO Y PAVIMENTO
(01 MULTIPURPOSE, INTERGENERATIONAL MOVEMENT SPACES | 01 ESPACIOS

MULTIUSOS DE MOVIMIENTO INTERGENERACIONAL)
CULTURAL KITCHEN | COCINA CULTURAL
(02 COMMUNITY KITCHEN AND CAFETERIA | 02 COCINA Y CAFETERÍA

COMUNITARIAS)
OUTDOOR TECH STATION | ESTACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA AL

AIRE LIBRE
(09 COMPUTER ACCESS AND EDUCATION | 09 ACCESO A LA COMPUTADORA Y EDUCACIÓN)
9 OUTDOOR LEARNING SPACES | ESPACIOS DE

APRENDIZAJE AL AIRE LIBRE
(07 MULTIFACETED EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT | APOYO EDUCATIVO
MULTIFACÉTICO)
COMMONALITIES | PUNTOS EN COMÚN:

Landscape themes consistent across much of your feedback:

Temas de paisaje consistentes en gran parte de sus comentarios:

FOOD, MUSIC, AND DANCE
COMIDA, MÚSICA Y BAILE

EXERCISE IN NATURAL
SETTING “GREEN EXERCISE”

EJERCICIO EN ENTORNO
NATURAL “EJERCICIO VERDE”

ACCESS TO NATURE AND

ETHNOBOTANICAL PLANTS

ACCESO A LA NATURALEZA Y
PLANTAS ETNOBOTÁNICAS

EDUCATION AND ACCESS

TO TECHNOLOGY
EDUCACIÓN Y ACCESO
A LA TECNOLOGÍA

MULTIGENERATIONAL AND

TRADITIONAL

MULTIGENERACIONAL Y

TRADICIONAL

ART REPRESENTING CULTURAL

HERITAGE

ARTE REPRESENTANTE DEL

PATRIMONIO CULTURAL
PROGRAMS | PROGRAMAS:

Listed in order of most to least dots received during Visioning Session 1 Dot Polling.

Enumerados en orden de mayor a menor puntos recibidos durante el sondeo de puntos de la sesión de visión 1.

Dot Polling Results — Design Mandate Favored Imagery & Commonalities The presentation board below was printed large format as 36”x72” and
distributed as an 11”x17” handout
to Visioning Session 2 participants.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
37 A Community Charrette
During the second half of Workshop #02, participants were divided into six groups. Each group consisted of 8-10 persons plus a design facilitator and bi-lingual colleague. The groups gathered around an existing Site Plan of the facility and were provided with transparent representations of the Programmatic Spaces and Design Mandates for the participants to overlay over the existing Site Plan as a “Space Planning Activity”. Each group’s final “Site Plan” was recorded.

It is the hope of the Design Team that as the project moves forward, the Dot Polling Results, Commonalities and Site Plan options will inform and influence the design for the future Multicultural Center.

Group 6 hashes out some possibilities with
landscape architect Karly Behncke.

Ellipses with site elements (green) or interior
programs (blue) were printed on acetate to overlay
the site plan. Write-ins were purple.

Group 1 poses at their table in the existing Multipurpose Room of the Community Center after completing their site planning activity. Architect Douglas Thornley (standing) joined their table.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
38 Group 1:
• Provide Community Gathering Space in north
undeveloped site
• Increase parking
• Increase trees along Healdsburg Avenue
• Provide Arts + Crafts space (infill southwest adj to
portables or adjacent to Community Gathering
Space)
• Provide an indoor soccer facility
• Provide a proper exterior soccer pitch
• Provide a Temazcal at either end of the property
(ensuring privacy)
• Provide exterior lighting at existing sports field (for night use)
• Provide outdoor learning spaces adjacent to sports
field
• Provide an outdoor track (for sports) around sports
field
• Preserve current (health) services
Detailed Summary of Notes per Charrette Group
Group 2:
• Mostly programing
• Table two placed acetate programs overtop of
where they are existing in order to ‘lock them in’
and preserve their programs.
• Table two came up with so many of their own
programs that they used all of the purple open
ended ellipses and more plain trace paper.

Group 3—Scheme 1:
‣ Community Center
• Use existing rooms in the community center for
quiet activity. Ie: Use existing MPR for quiet
study
• Have noisy activities on the south side of the
community center. Ie: Music room located on
south side of community center
• Rearrangement of room use inside the existing
community center
• Locate historic mural on free-standing wall east
of the existing amphitheater
‣ South of Community Center
• Locate ethnobotanical garden at location of
former garden. Locate community kitchen west
of the ethnobotanical garden and outdoor
cultural kitchen south of the ethnobotanical
garden.
• Locate large community gathering structure in
southwest corner of hardcourt. Include outdoor
music performance and stage with seating
• Provide indoor soccer, basketball and gym
venue at location of existing basketball courts
• Expand one bay of parking into lawn
• Include walking paths
• Use hardcourt for Zumba, play structure and
pavement activity
‣ Undeveloped Parcel
• Outdoor learning, Outdoor tech station and
Sweat House
Group 3— Scheme 2:
‣ Community Center
• Use existing rooms in the community center for
noisy activity. Ie: Use existing MPR for
performance space
• Have quiet activities on the south side of the
community center. Ie: classrooms and quiet
study
• Rearrangement of room use inside the existing
community center
• Locate historic mural on free-standing wall east
of the existing amphitheater
‣ South of Community Center
• Locate ethnobotanical garden at location of
former garden. Locate community kitchen west
of the ethnobotanical garden and outdoor
cultural kitchen south of the ethnobotanical
garden.
• Locate large community gathering structure in
southwest corner of hardcourt. Include outdoor
music performance and stage with seating
• Provide indoor soccer, basketball and gym
venue at location of existing basketball courts
• Include walking paths
• Use hardcourt for Zumba, play structure and
pavement activity
‣ Undeveloped Parcel
• Outdoor Learning, Outdoor tech station and
Sweat House
• Music room
Group 4:
• "All in the short term" note added at the end -
• at the zoomed-out diagram level, this group chose
to maintain the 'indoor' program where the
building is and the 'outdoor' programs where the
open space/fields are. -
• exceptions: the community kitchen away from the
existing building, adjacent to the open space/large
gathering space; the addition of a pool at the site
of the current baseball fields. -
• the existing athletic fields have been taken over
by other programming. -
• the live music/food truck programs on the north
site were a last minute addition because there
was confusion as to whether this was, in fact, part
of the parcel. this demonstrates excitement about
this location though these are short term
measures.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
39 Group 6:
• Noted how important parking is to maintain and
expand where possible due to the overflow during
events/soccer games. Not willing to lose trees for
parking.
• General interest was more in programming and
how to use un-used space in the community center
quickly and effectively for what the community
needed: Financial Support, Life Skills Youth
Support, Art-Making Spaces, Dance Class, Event
Hall.
• Liked the idea of re-using former garden area for
the Ethnobotanical Garden and also align it with
outdoor learning spaces so it can support
educational activities to the garden as well.
• The hardcourt area adjacent to the field is very
important not only for parking during overflow
events, but for the youth. Re-striping or adding
color to the pavement for creating new activities
seemed of interest. Keeping basketball was a
must, but there was an idea that it could be a
covered soccer space as well.
• Activating Foss Creek Pathway with fitness
Stations, Cultural Plants for interest and signage
that could provided measured increment
information or educational signage about
ornamental plants that tell a story about the
regions of their native countries
• Murals could be placed on any open wall space
• General excitement about creating an large event
space in the undeveloped parcel for parties, music
events, and impromptu food park. Parking was
noted of importance, and could be placed at
furthest corner where entry from adjacent road
could be easy.

Three of the five groups creating site plans during Visioning Session 2 Group 5:
• Passionate about preserving parking lot space
• Excited about having the Pool and the Temazcal
adjacent to each other
• Considering splitting field up into new areas,
keeping some lawn for progams such as zumba,
nature play, and a gathering pavilion (potential for
an artificial turf field)
• Walking path with bilingual signage adjacent to/
going through the ethnobotanical garden
• Mention of indoor soccer
• Mural to be placed on existing building to
accentuate the space
After the breakout session, an open discussion was started to bring the groups back together. The summary of notes are as follows:
• a place for events/ music (Event Hall for rent)
• An indoor soccer area - year round, all-weather sports complex • Currently they have to travel to Sports Complex in Santa Rosa (Sports City) • Fitness stations, plants and signage along existing walkway to amplify that experience • A location for Food trucks (similar to Mitote Food Park in Santa Rosa) • Providing spaces for technology and financial education • Art making spaces for the local artisans to create and sell their work • Spaces for dance classes/music classes
• Varying degrees for access of youth activities - indoor and outdoor • Funding for sports usages
• Community Center
• Use existing rooms in the community center for quiet activity. Ie: Use existing MPR for quiet study
• Have noisy activities on the south side of the community center. Ie: Music room located on south side of community center
• Rearrangement of room use inside the existing community center • Locate historic mural on free-standing wall east of the existing amphitheater • Prefer to put effort into programming + healthcare and not the building. • Provide spaces for Arts + Crafts (space for weaving), indoor soccer, dancing; outdoor gym/exercise equipment; proper Soccer Field; Training Facility for Soccer Teams; Arts + Crafts program for children; Music programming; Resiliency Center capability. Provide funds for Soccer Program, child activities (ballet, dance, etc).

Mostly programming and not design (with exception of Indoor Soccer, Training Facility and Resiliency Center).

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
40 Site Planning Activity — Group 1 Plan

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
41 Site Planning Activity — Group 2 Plan

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
42 Site Planning Activity — Group 3 Plan 1

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
43 Site Planning Activity — Group 3 Plan 2

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
44 Site Planning Activity — Group 4 Plan

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
45 Site Planning Activity — Group 5 Plan

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
46 Site Planning Activity — Group 6 Plan

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
47 Future Directions
The Design Team was asked to develop a Master Plan Concept and 3D Renderings of possible interventions at the existing Healdsburg Community Center that incorporate the visions provided during Workshops #01/#02. The interventions are as follows:

View of the amphitheater from the existing and underutilized west courtyard. ‣ Master Plan
Concept
‣ West Courtyard
‣ East Courtyard
‣ South Courtyard
‣ Multipurpose Room
Master Plan Concept
The master plan is based on input from the meeting participants that identified inclusivity, welcomeness, multigenerational activity, sustainability, places to have food together, an outdoor kitchen, adding connections to nature, native and ethnobotanical plants, music, gathering areas, quiet areas, space for events, color and vibrancy. Provide indoor/outdoor relationships and be rustic or traditional in architectural style rather than modern.

The master plan illustrates several recommendations that can be interventions into the community center. Recommendations are presented in a framework of tiers and can be adjusted as needed.

First tier: Introduce painting of the exterior walls with bright colors to add vibrancy. This will also help identify each building and courtyard and help with visitor wayfinding.

Introduce community-based multicultural murals based on traditional themes.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
48 19
18 19
17 16
7 6
1 2
8 5
7 16
15 14
12 13
9 10
11 8
4 3
7 19 GROVE ST

HEALDSBURG AVE

OAK GROVE APARTMENTS

RR TRACKS

H E A L D S B U R G M U L T I C U L T U R A L

COMMUNITY CENTER

HARDCOURTS

NORTH PARKING

SOUTH PARKING

UNDEVELOPED AREA
ENTRY

EVA ACCESS
ENTRY

FOSS CREEK PATHWAY

FOSS CREEK PATHWAY

FOSS CREEK

GRASS SPORTS FIELD
EXIT
0 50 100 200 N
LEGEND
1 PAINT EXTERIOR WALLS WHAT VIBRANT COLORS INSPIRED BY MEXICAN ARCHITECT LUIS BARRAGAN AND RICARDO LEGORRETA.
2 RENOVATE THE MULTIPURPOSE ROOM AND CREATE AN INDOOR / OUTDOOR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EAST COURTYARD. OPEN THE SOUTHEAST WALL OF MULTIPURPOSE ROOM BY INSTALLING A TILT-UP GLASS DOOR. ADD INTERIOR FIRE SPRINKLERS. RENOVATE THE KITCHEN. UPDATE LIGHTING. ADD RAIN GARDENS.
3 RENOVATE THE COMMUNITY MEETING ROOM TO CREATE INDOOR / OUTDOOR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE WEST COURTYARD AND THE CORAZÓN HEALDSBURG OFFICES. OPEN THE SOUTH WALL OF THE COMMUNITY MEETING ROOM BY CHANGING WINDOWS TO OPERABLE GLASS DOORS. ADD INTERIOR FIRE SPRINKLERS. ADD PERGOLA FOR SHADE AND AESTHETICS. REPLACE CONCRETE PAVING WITH SALVAGED CONCRETE PAVING AND SONOMA FIELDSTONE BOULDERS. ADD REMOVABLE FURNITURE.

ADD A RAIN GARDEN.
4 RENOVATE WEST COURTYARD NEAR CORAZÓN HEALDSBURG OFFICES. INCLUDES DECOMPOSED

GRANITE PAVING, SALVAGED CONCRETE PAVING (URBANITE) RAISED WATER FEATURE, BOSQUE OF DECIDUOUS CREPE MYRTLE TREES. ADD REMOVABLE FURNITURE. RENOVATE EXISTING PLANTERS, ADD NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAIN GARDENS.
5 RENOVATE THE EAST COURTYARD NEXT TO THE MULTIPURPOSE ROOM AND YMCA CHILDCARE ROOMS. INFILL SUNKEN AMPHITHEATER WITH WOOD DECK / DANCE FLOOR. ADD RETRACTABLE SHADE CANOPY OVER WOOD DECK. ADD ROOF TO THE STAGE. ADD WALL AT BACK OF STAGE. MOVE STAGE TO BE CENTERED ON THE DECK. MOVE EXISTING PERIMETER WALL ON EAST SIDE TO EXPAND THE COURTYARD SPACE. PROTECT EXISTING TREES, ADD WOOD TOPPED SEAT WALLS, PLANTING, AND RAIN GARDENS.
6 RENOVATE SOUTH COURTYARD. REPLACE CONCRETE PAVING WITH A GARDEN OF COLORFUL PLANTS, RAIN GARDENS, DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING AND URBANITE IN A RANDOM PATTERN. PROVIDE BUILT-IN SEATING AND MOVABLE FURNITURE IN COVERED CORRIDORS. 7 ART WALK: COLORFUL PAVING MURAL FOR CONNECTION THROUGHOUT. 8 COMMUNITY BASED MURAL.
9 ADD A PICNIC PAVILION / SHADE STRUCTURE WITH OUTDOOR KITCHEN OR BBQ AREA WITH WATER AND ELECTRICITY. ADD PLANTING AND RAIN GARDEN.
10 RENOVATE ABANDONED COMMUNITY GARDEN AS AN ETHNOBOTANICAL GARDEN. INCLUDE STAKEHOLDERS IN PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE. ADD RAISED BEDS AND FRUIT TREES FOR COMMUNITY USE. ADD BILINGUAL SIGNAGE, AN ART FENCE, GATES, AND MAINTENANCE GATE FOR TRUCK ACCESS. PROVIDE A GARDEN AREA FOR USE BY YMCA CHILDCARE CENTER. 11 REPLACE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING WITH “QUIET GARDEN.” INCLUDE DECOMPOSED GRANITE

PAVING, NATIVE PLANTING, SHADE TREES, MOVABLE FURNITURE AND QUIET SEATING AREA THAT CAN ALSO BE USED AS AN OUTDOOR CLASSROOM.
12 RENOVATE THE EXISTING PLAY AREA. ADD NATURE PLAY, PATHWAYS, PLANTING, RAIN GARDENS, SHADE TREES AND FURNITURE FOR MULTI-GENERATIONAL USE.
13 ROTATE AND COLOR THE EXISTING BASKETBALL COURTS. REPLACE SOME ASPHALT PAVING WITH

DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING, URBANITE, SEAT WALLS, SEATING, SHADE TREES, PLANTING, AND RAIN GARDENS.
14 ADD EXERCISE STATION EQUIPMENT FOR MULTI-GENERATIONAL USE. 15 RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING TO ACCOMMODATE FORMAL OR INFORMAL PARKING. USE PART OF THE EXISTING PAVING FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND TO ACCOMMODATE FOOD TRUCKS.

REPLACE EXISTING PAVEMENT NEXT TO THE MULTI-USE FIELD WITH DECOMPOSED GRANITE, SHADE TREES, PICNIC TABLES AND SEATING. DESIGNATE A PAVED AREA FOR WALKING AT THE EDGE OF THE FIELD SO PEOPLE CAN WALK A LOOP AROUND THE FIELD.
16 BIO-BASIN TO TREAT STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM ADJACENT ASPHALT BEFORE IT ENTERS FOSS CREEK.
17 USE THE UNDEVELOPED PARCEL FOR TEMPORARY AND SEASONAL EVENTS THAT COULD INCLUDE

TEMPORARY TENTS, PORTABLE STAGE, PORTABLE DANCE FLOOR, FOOD TRUCKS AND OTHER TEMPORARY FACILITIES FOR SPECIAL EVENTS. FOR THE LONG TERM, CONSIDER ADDING AN

ACCESSIBLE OUTDOOR PAVILION WITH RESTROOMS, STORAGE, STAGE AREA, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, AND A LAWN FOR SPECIAL EVENTS.
18 ADD TRAILHEAD/ BIKE RALLY AREA FOR FOSS CREEK PATHWAY. CONSIDER ADDING SHADE, SEATING, WATER, BIKE FIX-IT STATION, ART, EXERCISE STATIONS AND BILINGUAL EDUCATIONAL SIGNAGE. 19 ADD ART, SEATING, SHADE TREES AND BILINGUAL EDUCATIONAL SIGNAGE ALONG FOSS CREEK PATHWAY.

GENERAL NOTE: PROTECT EXISTING MATURE TREES.

Master Plan Concept

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
49 Second Tier: Renovate the east courtyard, the west courtyard near the Corazón offices and the Alliance Medical Center and renovate the south courtyard. This will soften the courtyards, add plants and shade and provide a place for events and outdoor gatherings.

Renovate the planting next to the covered walkway between the east courtyard and the south courtyard. Consider adding rain gardens in the courtyards to treat stormwater from impervious surfaces before entering Foss Creek. See images and description below of courtyards.

Third Tier: Renovate the Multipurpose Room and create an indoor/outdoor relationship with the east courtyard. Renovate the Community Meeting Room to create an indoor/outdoor relationship with the west courtyard and the Corazón offices. Add fire sprinklers as part of the room renovations. Consider adding rain gardens in the courtyard to treat stormwater from impervious surfaces before entering Foss Creek.

Fourth tier: Continue to implement community-based murals, paint the paving under the outdoor corridors as an “art walk”, renovate the paved area south of the buildings and add a picnic pavilion/shade structure with outdoor kitchen or barbecue area with water and electricity, ethnobotanical and herb garden, a quiet garden, add shade trees and shrub planting. Also consider placing art, bilingual educational signage, exercise stations, a bike fix it station and bike trailhead along the Foss Creek Bikeway. Consider adding rain gardens to treat stormwater from impervious surfaces before entering Foss Creek.

Fifth tier: Renovate the large asphalt paved area next to the multipurpose field to accommodate food truck events, informal or formal parking, rotate and color the basketball courts, add exercise stations, shade tree and shrub planting, seating areas and enlarge the children’s play area. Replace some asphalt with decomposed granite paving and salvaged concrete placed like flagstone to soften the space. Add bio-retention areas to treat stormwater from impervious surfaces before entering Foss Creek.

Sixth tier: Use the undeveloped parcel for temporary and seasonal events that could include temporary tents, portable stage, portable dance floor, food trucks and other temporary facilities for special events. For the long term consider adding an accessible outdoor pavilion for events, with restrooms, storage, stage area, outdoor kitchen and a lawn for events.

N
Above: the overview of the west and east courtyards illustrates three different shading measures proposed.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore) Prospective Perspectives — West Courtyard 50

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
51 Adjacent: View looking east toward the bosque,
across the garden lounge outside the
Community Meeting Room.

Prospective Perspectives — West
Courtyard
The West Courtyard includes a communitybased mural and painted walls. It replaces the concrete paving with decomposed
granite paving and salvaged concrete
paving (urbanite) arranged in a random
pattern to soften the courtyard. It has a
raised water feature with cobble stones
that mimic an arroyo and can also look
natural when dry during a drought.

A bosque of deciduous flowering trees,
such as Crape myrtle, provides dappled
summer shade and winter sun, native
plants and movable furniture add nature
and comfort to the courtyard. It also
includes an overhead pergola next to the
Community Meeting Room to provide a
dramatic shade pattern that changes and
marks the sun movement throughout the
day. Next to the pergola, a wall of
windows in the Community Meeting Room
wall facing the courtyard is transformed
into a wall of operable glass doors for an
indoor/outdoor feeling. Consider adding
rain gardens to treat stormwater from
impervious surfaces before entering Foss
Creek.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore) Prospective Perspectives — East Courtyard 52

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
53 Adjacent: View from just inside the multipurpose
room, looking south onto the east courtyard’s
new patio, shade structure, and band shell
backdrop.

Prospective Perspectives — East
Courtyard
The east courtyard includes a communitybased mural and painted walls. A majority of the south wall of the Multipurpose
Room is transformed into an operable
glass door blurring the line between
indoor and outdoor.

The sunken amphitheater is filled in with a
multipurpose wood deck and dance floor.

The stage is centered on the wood deck.

The deck is covered with a retractable
fabric canopy for seasonal shade or sun.

The existing freestanding courtyard wall is
moved to enlarge the courtyard and
accommodate the new stage and rear
stage wall. Plantings and wood-topped
seat walls are added in the corners to
soften the space, and frame views of the
stage. Consider adding rain gardens to
treat stormwater from impervious surfaces
before entering Foss Creek.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore) Prospective Perspectives — South Courtyard 54

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
55 Prospective Perspectives — South Courtyard
The south courtyard includes painted walls. The concrete paving is replaced with a garden of colorful native plants, decomposed granite paving and urbanite in a random pattern. Built-in benches, and movable furniture are arranged in the adjacent covered corridors. Consider adding rain gardens to treat stormwater from impervious surfaces before entering Foss Creek.

Below: Birds’ eye view of the south courtyard
shows the tapestry of plantings proposed and the
walkway that bisects it. North is up.

Adjacent: View looking east as one exits the public
restrooms. The florals compliment and contrast the
proposed paint colors.

N

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore) Prospective Perspectives — Multipurpose Room 56

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
57 Prospective Perspectives — Multipurpose Room
The existing Multipurpose Room at the existing Healdsburg Community Center was a former cafeteria for a K-6 Elementary School dating back to the late 1980’s. The Design Team believes the room can be substantially transformed to reflect the diversity of the community as well as support a diversity of uses and activities. The vision shown weaves the following modifications to open the space to the outdoors and improve the acoustics and lighting for the types of activities spelled out in the OTM report: • Removal of storage structure (to be replaced with a simple structure adjacent to the Restroom) to allow for a flip-up glass door that will provide views into the adjacent east courtyard and encourage indoor/outdoor activities. • Install a wood slat acoustical ceiling assembly to improve the sound experience and warm the space.
• Removal of fold-down cafeteria tables and infill wall niches with wood slat acoustical wall panels.
• New lighting to provide more flexibility for daytime / nighttime activities. • Replace existing flooring with a wood dance floor system. • Color: introduce colors more reflective of the diverse Healdsburg community.

It should be noted that another project related to the Multipurpose Room is the replacement and expansion of the existing commercial kitchen to better support the desire for a Community Kitchen.

Adjacent: View from east courtyard looking into the Multipurpose Room, now a much more appropriate atmosphere for community festivities.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

VISIONING SESSIONS
58 Notes on Color
One of the simplest and cost effective
means for transforming the facility into a
Multicultural Center is the introduction of
vibrant colors to the exterior of the existing
buildings. The Design Team is inspired by
the use of color by two famous Mexican
architects, Luis Barragán and Ricardo
Legorreta. The colors selected should be
rooted in how the diverse cultures of
Healdsburg experience the world. The
colors suggested are brilliant yellow,
orange, red and purple. If the City of
Healdsburg decides to proceed with
rethinking the exterior color palette for the
facility when transforming it into the
Multicultural Center, then a more careful
and deep study of which colors are finally
determined should take place.

Adjacent: View of the west courtyard from the entry
walkway. The existing mural shown right compliments the proposed landscaping and paint color upgrades.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

APPENDIX

APPENDICES A-C RELATE TO LISTENING SESSIONS

APPENDICES D & E RELATE TO VISIONING SESSIONS

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
60 1. Community & Connection: • What are the joys and challenges of living in Healdsburg? • How does living in Healdsburg affect your connections to community and culture? • What support systems do you rely on during challenging times?

2. Vision for the Center: • How can a multicultural center best serve Healdsburg? • How do you envision yourself engaging with the center? • What is the essence or "spirit" of the multicultural center? • Describe the atmosphere of your ideal multicultural center. What does it feel like? Smell like? Look like? What's the first thing you sense upon entering?

3. Facilities & Amenities: • What facilities and amenities would make you feel comfortable, welcomed, and supported at the center?
• What amenities would support your health and wellness? • What types of art would you like to see at the center? (e.g., sculptures, paintings)

4. Programming & Activities: • What activities or programs do you envision for yourself and your loved ones? • What educational opportunities should the center offer? (e.g., computer skills, language learning, cooking)
• What activities would support your health and well-being?

5. Resources & Support: • What resources should the center provide? • What is essential for the center to support meaningful engagement and programming?

6. Location & Site: • Ideally, where should the center be located? • What makes this location ideal for a multicultural center? Appendix A. Protocol Questions
A. PROTOCOL QUESTIONS

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
61 Figure 3 visually represents the responses to the survey question "In the multicultural center of my dreams, I would like to SEE...". Here's an analysis of the responses:

Nouns Frequency Adjectives Frequency
Juegos / Games 33 Infantiles 23
Mural 12 Culturales 5
Plantas / Plants 31 Nativas 9
Niños / Children 10 Comfortable 3
Flores / Flowers 9 Welcoming 2
TABLE 9. FREQUENCY CHART BY PART-OF-SPEECH - “SEE”
Topic modeling was not performed on the Spanish and English data due to the limited sample size. However, a brief thematic analysis of responses revealed several key themes:
• Youth Play Space: Participants expressed a strong preference for dedicated play areas for children and youth.
• Broad Plant Diversity: There was a desire for native, medicinal, and food-producing plants, reflecting an interest in biodiversity and environmental harmony within the multicultural center.
• Multipurpose Sports Fields: Participants frequently requested versatile spaces that could accommodate a variety of sports and physical activities. • Participatory and Culturally-Relevant Murals: There were suggestions for murals that engage the community and reflect its cultural identity.
• Community Kitchen: Participants expressed interest in a shared kitchen space for cooking classes, food preparation, and communal dining.

Figure 3. “SEE” Word Cloud
Commonly Clustered
Phrases (Frequency):
• “Juegos infantiles” /
“Games for children” (23)
• “Plantas nativas” /
“Native plants” (10)
• “Salon fiestas” / “Party
area” (4)
• “Campos deportivos” /
“Sports fields” (3)
• “Kart track” (2)
“SEE” Prominent Themes:
• Spaces for Gathering and Community: Words like "place," "center," "spaces," "comunitaria," and "reuniones" are prominent, highlighting the desire for a place that fosters community interaction and a sense of belonging. "Lugar" reinforces this in Spanish.
• Nature and Outdoors: The prominence of "gardens," "trees," "flowers," "plants," "afuera" (outside), "naturales," and "arboles" suggests a strong desire to incorporate nature and outdoor spaces into the center. This could include gardens, green spaces, or outdoor activity areas. • Activities and Recreation: Words like "activities," "sports," "deportivos," "juegos" (games), "baile" (dance), "bailar," and "distraer" (distract/entertain) indicate a desire for diverse recreational and activity spaces within the center. This could include spaces for sports, dance, games, and other forms of recreation. • Arts and Culture: The presence of "mural," "murales," "art," "cultural," "colors," "arte," and "culturales" signifies the importance of arts and cultural expression within the center. This could involve murals, art displays, cultural events, and spaces for artistic creation.
• A Welcoming and Inclusive Environment: Words like "comfortable," "bienvenida" (welcome), "agradable" (pleasant), "open," "bright," and "welcoming" emphasize the need for a welcoming and inclusive atmosphere. The center should be a place where everyone feels comfortable and accepted. • Learning and Education: The presence of "education," "clases" (classes), "aprender" (learn), and "educacion" indicates an interest in educational opportunities at the center. This could include language classes, computer skills training, or other educational programs.
• Food and sustenance: "Cocina" (kitchen), "cafeteria," and "food" suggest a desire for food services or a communal kitchen space. This could involve a cafe, a community kitchen, or space for cooking classes or cultural food events.

Appendix B. Detailed Results from Each Survey Cards Question B. DETAILED RESULTS FROM EACH SURVEY CARDS QUESTION

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
62 Figure 4 visually represents the responses to the survey question "In the multicultural center of my dreams I would like to DO...". Here's an analysis:

TABLE 10. FREQUENCY CHART BY PART-OF-SPEECH - "DO" RESPONSES Key Themes from Responses:

While a formal topic modeling analysis was not feasible due to the limited sample size, a thematic analysis of responses revealed several key themes:
• Arts and Crafts Space: Participants envision a multipurpose, community-led "maker space" that offers arts and crafts activities, lessons, and community education.
• Educational Support: Participants expressed a desire for study spaces, educational and tutoring resources, and youth peer support. • Exercise and Dance: Participants expressed interest in multipurpose spaces to support a variety of traditional, cultural, and modern dance activities (including Zumba), as well as exercise spaces for personal fitness and community health.

Figure 4. “DO” Word Cloud
Nouns Frequency Adjectives Frequency Verbs Frequency
Manualidades/Crafts 38 Voluntaria/Voluntary 2 Aprender/Learn 7 Arte/Arts 29 Cultural 1 Bailar/Dance 2
Classes/Clases 11 N/A N/A Estudiar/Study 2
Zumba 7 N/A N/A Enseñar/Teach 2
Sports/Deportes 5 N/A N/A Ayudar/Help 1
“DO” Prominent Themes:
● Active Engagement and Learning: Words like "learn," "aprender" (learn), "estudiar" (study), "classes," "clases" (classes), "talleres" (workshops), "skills," and "enseñar" (teach) indicate a strong interest in active learning and skill-building opportunities. The center should offer diverse classes, workshops, and resources for personal and professional development.
● Arts and Creativity: The prominence of "crafts," "manualidades" (crafts), "arts," "arte" (art), "painting," "dancing," "baile" (dance), "music," "música," and "photography" emphasizes the importance of creative expression and artistic activities. The center should provide spaces and resources for various art forms, including visual arts, performing arts, and crafts.
● Health and Wellness: Words like "exercise," "yoga," "zumba," "pilates," "ejercicio" (exercise), "relajarme" (relax), "health," and "bienestar" (well-being) suggest a focus on physical and mental health. The center should offer spaces and programs that promote wellness, such as fitness classes, yoga, and relaxation activities.
● Social Connection and Community: Words like "play," "socializar" (socialize), "compartir" (share), "ayudar" (help), "voluntaria" (volunteer), "community," and "comunitaria" highlight the importance of social interaction and community building. The center should facilitate opportunities for people to connect, socialize, and support each other.
● Recreation and Entertainment: The presence of "sports," "deportes" (sports), "games," "juegos" (games), "bowling," "arcade," "pool," "futbol" (soccer), and "dance" indicates a desire for recreational activities and entertainment options. The center should offer spaces and equipment for various recreational activities. ● Cultural Activities: Words like "cultural," "bailes" (dances), "fiestas" (parties), "music," "cocina" (cooking), and "comida" (food) suggest an interest in cultural events and activities. The center should host cultural celebrations, performances, and gatherings.

Commonly Clustered
Phrases (Frequency):
• "Arte y manualidades" /
"Arts and crafts" (19)
• "Zumba y
manualidades" (7)
• "Clases Zumba" (2)
B. DETAILED RESULTS FROM EACH SURVEY CARDS QUESTION

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
63 Note: Topic modeling was not performed on the Spanish and English data due to the limited sample size.

TABLE 11. WORD FREQUENCY BY PART-OF-SPEECH FOR "FEEL" (SURVEY RESPONSES) Key Themes from Responses (Thematic Analysis)
• Calm, Quiet Sensory Spaces: Desire for reduced-sensory areas for decompression, relaxation, and mindfulness.
• Community Autonomy and Co-Creation: Emphasis on community involvement in the design, implementation, and management of the center.
• Empowerment and Justice: Vision for the center as a promoter of spatial, environmental, racial, and economic/social justice.

Figure 5. “FEEL” Word Cloud
Part of Speech Spanish Word (English) Frequency
Nouns Relajación (Relaxation) 29
Alegría (Joy) 18
Emoción (Excitement) 10
Seguridad (Security) 4
Adjectives Segura (Safe) 8
Relajado (Relaxed) 6
Feliz (Happy) 4
Verbs Bienvenida (Welcomed) 4
Convivir (Co-existing) 3
Tranquilidad (Peace of Mind) 5
Figure 5 visually represents the responses to the survey question "In the multicultural center of my dreams, I would like to FEEL...". Here's a breakdown of the analysis:

Commonly Clustered
Phrases (Frequency):
• Alegría y relajación" / "Joy
and relaxation" (13)
• "Alegría y emoción" / "Joy
and excitement" (5)
• "Paz y tranquilidad" / "Peace
and tranquility" (2)
• "Stress-free" (2)
“FEEL” Dominant Emotions and Sensations:
● Happiness and Joy: Words like "happy," "alegría" (joy), "feliz" (happy), "joy," "felicidad" (happiness), "emocion" (emotion), and "excited" dominate the cloud, indicating that people primarily want to feel happy, joyful, and excited in the multicultural center.
● Safety and Security: The prominence of "safe," "segura" (safe), "seguridad" (security), "tranquilidad" (tranquility), "paz" (peace), and "security" emphasizes the need for a safe and secure environment where people feel comfortable and protected. ● Relaxation and Peace: Words like "relaxed," "relajada" (relaxed), "relaxation," "relajarme" (relax), "calm," "tranquilidad" (tranquility), "paz" (peace), and "stress-free" suggest a desire for a space that promotes relaxation, stress reduction, and a sense of peace.
● Welcome and Belonging: The presence of "welcome," "bienvenida" (welcome), "belonging," "included," "incluida" (included), "home," "accepted," and "comunidad" (community) highlights the importance of creating a welcoming and inclusive environment where everyone feels a sense of belonging. ● Motivation and Inspiration: Words like "inspired," "motivacion" (motivation), "motivaciones" (motivations), and "empowered" indicate a desire for a space that inspires, motivates, and empowers individuals.

B. DETAILED RESULTS FROM EACH SURVEY CARDS QUESTION

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
64 TABLE 12. FREQUENCY CHART BY PART-OF-SPEECH - "HEAR" RESPONSES Key Themes from Responses:

While a formal topic modeling analysis was not feasible due to the limited sample size, a thematic analysis of responses suggested the following key themes:
• Music as a Cultural Component: Music practice, musical arts environments, and ambient music should be established as integral to the cultural identity of the center. The center should support and uplift cultural music and music practices (e.g., "música baja antigua," "Música Latina," "Música Triqui," "Música Banda"). • Community-Centric Environment: The center should provide spaces for entertainment, gathering, community building, and conversation. It should actively engage with local communities to host events and gatherings.
• Sensory Awareness: The center should be designed with diverse sensory environments, allowing visitors to choose their desired level of sensory stimulation or engagement.

Figure 6. “HEAR” Word Cloud
Nouns Frequency Adjectives Frequency Verbs Frequency
Música/Music 36 Relajante/Relaxing 2 Having/Tener 2
Niños/Children 19 Diferentes/Different 1 Tocar/Playing 2 Risas/Laughter 17 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Gente/People 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Banda 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Note: Topic modeling was not performed on the Spanish and English data due to the limited sample size.

Figure 6 visually represents the responses to the survey question "In the multicultural center of my dreams, I would like to HEAR...". Here's an analysis:
“HEAR” Dominant Sounds:
● Music and Laughter: "Music," "música," "laughter," and "risas" (laughter) are the most prominent words, indicating a desire for a lively and joyful atmosphere filled with music and laughter. This suggests the center should host musical performances, events with music, and spaces where people can enjoy music together. ● Language and Learning: Words like "classes," "clases" (classes), "spanish," "english," "idiomas" (languages), and "información" (information) suggest an interest in language learning and educational programs. The sounds of people learning and exchanging ideas are desired. ● Community and Connection: "Community," "comunidad," "gente" (people), "niños" (children), "adultos" (adults), and "compañeros" (companions) highlight the importance of community interaction and connection. The center should be a place where people can hear the sounds of conversations, shared laughter, and community building.
● Cultural Expression: Words like "cultural," "cultura," "bailes" (dances), "cumbias" (a type of Latin American music), "latino," and "latina" indicate a desire to hear cultural expressions through music, dance, and language.

Commonly Clustered Phrases
(Frequency):
• "Música y risas" / "Music and
laughter" (15)
• "Risas de niños" / "Children's
laughter" (4)
Various Music Preferences:
• "Música latina" (3)
• "Música banda" (3)
• "Música relajante" / "Relaxing
music" (2)
• "Tocar instrumentos" / "Playing
instruments" (2)
B. DETAILED RESULTS FROM EACH SURVEY CARDS QUESTION

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
65 TABLE 13. FREQUENCY CHART BY PART-OF-SPEECH - "TAKE" RESPONSES Key Themes from Responses (Thematic Analysis):
• Career-Technical Education: Participants expressed a desire for bilingual, culturally responsive educational courses to support career development and certification in areas such as automotive technology, mechanics, and computer skills.
• Educational Support: Participants indicated a need for youth and adult educational support, including language learning (Spanish and English), literacy development, academic support, and extracurricular offerings like art, cooking classes, and ethnic studies. • Life Skills Support: Participants expressed interest in courses or programs designed to support transitional-aged youth in areas such as career development, personal finance, purpose-finding, and job hiring opportunities.

Figure 7. “TAKE” Word Cloud
Nouns Frequency Adjectives Frequency Verbs Frequency
Clases/Classes 91 Vocational/Profesional 3 Aprender/Learn 2 Inglés/English 37 Mechanical 2 Ayudar/Help 2
Computo/
Computer
13 Productivos/
Productive
1 Desestresar/Destress1
Cocina/Cooking 5 Español/Spanish 7 N/A N/A
Note: Topic modeling was not performed on the Spanish and English data due to the limited sample size.

Figure 7 visually represents the responses to the survey question, "In the multicultural center of my dreams, I would like to TAKE...". Here's an breakdown of the analysis:

Commonly Clustered
Phrases (Frequency):
• “Clases de inglés” /
“English classes” (25)
• “Clases de computo” /
“Clases de computadora” /
“Computer classes” (18)
• “Clases de cocina” /
“Cooking classes” (9)
• “Real-world life skills
courses” (3)
“TAKE” Dominant Themes:
● Skills and Knowledge: The prominent words "skills," "computer," "computadora" (computer), "language," "spanish," "inglés" (English), "cooking," "clases" (classes), and "learning" indicate a strong desire for skillbuilding and educational opportunities. The center should offer classes, workshops, and resources in areas like language learning, computer literacy, cooking, and other practical skills. ● Health and Wellness: Words like "yoga," "ejercicio" (exercise), "zumba," "gardening," "jardinería" (gardening), "salud" (health), and "terapia" (therapy) suggest a focus on physical and mental well-being. The center should provide programs and resources that promote health, such as fitness classes, gardening workshops, and mental health support.
● Arts and Creativity: The presence of "art," "arte" (art), "crafts," "tejido" (weaving), "singing," "pintura" (painting), "guitar," and "piano" highlights the importance of creative expression and artistic development. The center should offer classes, workshops, and spaces for various art forms, including visual arts, music, and crafts.
● Personal and Professional Development: Words like "studies," "estudios" (studies), "homework," "academic," "académico" (academic), "professional," "profesional" (professional), "business," and "vocational" indicate a desire for personal and professional growth opportunities. The center should offer resources and programs that support career development, continuing education, and personal enrichment. ● Community and Support: Words like "help," "ayuda" (help), "support," "apoyen" (support), "community," "comunidad," and "ethnic" suggest a need for community support and resources. The center should provide a space where people can access support, connect with others, and learn about different cultures.

B. DETAILED RESULTS FROM EACH SURVEY CARDS QUESTION

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
66 Appendix C. Detailed Results from Overall Survey Frequency Parte del Discurso Palabra (Español/Inglés) Frecuencia
Nouns Clases / Classes 108
Música / Music 42
Manualidades / Crafts 40
Juegos / Games 34
Arte / Arts 33
Plantas / Plants 31
Inglés / English 25
Lugar / Place 22
Cocina / Cooking 19
Risas / Laughter 16
Adjectives Nativas / Native 9
Relajado/a / Relaxing 8
Segura / Safe 7
Culturales / Cultural 6
Comfortable / Cómodo/a 3
Afuera / Outside 3
Naturales / Natural 2
Gratis / Free 2
Verbs Aprender / Learn 12
Bailar / Dance 4
Sentir / Feel 3
Convivir / Co-existing 3
Ayudar / Help 3
Estudiar / Study 2
Jugar / Play 2
Involucrado/a / Involved 2
Commonly Clustered Phrases (Frequency):
• “Clases Inglés” / “English Classes” (25)
• “Arts and Crafts” / “Arte y Manualidades” (23)
• “clases Cómputo” / “clases computadora” / “Computer classes” (14) • “Plantas Nativas” / “Native Plants” (10)
• “Salon Fiestas” / “Party room” (4)
TABLE 14. FREQUENCY CHART BY PART-OF-SPEECH - OVERALL
Note: Topic modeling was not performed on the Spanish and English data due to the limited sample size.

C. DETAILED RESULTS FROM OVERALL SURVEY FREQUENCY

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
67 FIGURES 8-11. SPANISH TOPIC MODELING RESULTS1 1Based on empirical evidence from the WE1S Topic Model Observatory Guide, a relevance metric (λ = 0.61) was employed to ensure interpretable results. Topic selection was guided by multidimensional scaling distance and overall corpus coverage, with an arbitrary limit of 20 words per topic.

C. DETAILED RESULTS FROM OVERALL SURVEY FREQUENCY

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
68 Topics 1, 2, 3, 5, and 15 were selected for further analysis due to their interpretability and distinctiveness from other topics. Here's a refined interpretation of each topic:

Five key themes emerged from the analysis of community feedback regarding the Healdsburg Multicultural Center:

1. Intergenerational, Bilingual, and Multicultural Activities: The center should offer diverse recreational activities and courses accessible in multiple languages, catering to all ages and celebrating various cultural practices.

2. Art and Music as Cultural Cornerstones: Prioritize art and music education, recognizing their role in preserving cultural heritage and fostering community cohesion.

3. Multipurpose Sports Fields for Community Connection: Include multipurpose sports fields to promote physical activity, intergenerational interaction, and community building.

4. Educational Opportunities for Adults: Provide GED courses and adult educational support, including English language learning, to empower individuals and strengthen the community.

5. Environmentally Just and Culturally Relevant Design: The center's design should prioritize environmental sustainability and cultural responsiveness, creating a natural environment that complements the local ecosystem while celebrating Healdsburg's diverse cultural practices. This space should encourage community gatherings and foster a deeper connection with nature.
1Based on empirical evidence from the WE1S Topic Model Observatory Guide, a relevance metric (λ = 0.61) was employed to ensure interpretable results. Topic selection was guided by multidimensional scaling distance and overall corpus coverage, with an arbitrary limit of 20 words per topic.

FIGURE 12. SPANISH TOPIC MODELING RESULTS1
C. DETAILED RESULTS FROM OVERALL SURVEY FREQUENCY

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
69 PLEASE JOIN US / POR FAVOR ÚNASE A NOSOTROS:

Workshop 2 will be held in November at the Healdsburg Community Center. Please stay tuned for the exact date and time.

El taller 2 se llevará a cabo en noviembre en el Centro Comunitario de Healdsburg. Estén atentos para conocer la fecha y la hora exactas.
6:40 PM
45 Mins
Mingle/
Intercambiar
Open House: Visit Stations / Casa Abierta: Visitar Estaciones Discuss ideas with and offer feedback to
members of the design team at any station. No
need to follow any particular order.

1. LISTENING SESSION DATA
Review findings by On the Margins

2. SITE MAP
Imagine the layout for your ideal
facilities using the existing Community
Center site as your canvas.

3. ‘DESIGN MANDATE’ IMAGES
Vote with your dot stickers for what
you’d like your Multicultural/Community
Wellness Center to look like.

4. COMMENTS BOARD
Provide feedback
Discuta ideas y ofrezca comentarios a los miembros
del equipo de diseño en cualquier estación. No es
necesario seguir ningún orden en particular.

1. DATOS DE SESIÓN DE ESCUCHA
Revisar descubrimientos de On the Margins

2. SITIO PROPUESTO INICIALMENTE
Imagine el diseño de sus instalaciones
ideales utilizando el sitio existente del Centro
Comunitario como lienzo.

3. ‘MANDATOS DE DISEÑO’ IMÁGENES
Vote con sus pegatinas de puntos por cómo
le gustaría que se viera su Centro de
Bienestar Comunitario/Multicultural.

4. PANEL DE COMENTARIOS
Proponer retroalimentación
7:25 PM
5 Mins
Reconvene/
Reunirse
Final Wrap-Up / Resumen final
Closing announcements Anuncios de clausura
7:30 PM ADJOURN / APLAZAR
Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center Workshop 1 Agenda PAGE 2

AGENDA
Project: Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center / Proyecto: Centro Comunitario Multicultural de Healdsburg Subject: Workshop 1: Open House / Contenido: Taller 1 : Casa Abierta Date: October 16th, 2024 6:00 - 7:30 pm / Fecha: 16 de Octubre de 2024 6:00 - 7:30 PM OVERVIEW:

The purpose of this stakeholder session is to explore possible programs and architectures for a Multicultural/Community Wellness Center. We will focus today on the “Design Mandates” that resulted from the seven Listening Sessions conducted by On the Margins, to explore how each might look and imagine how each might be situated in relation to one another on the existing Community Center site.

DESCRIPCIÓN GENERAL:

El propósito de esta sesión de partes interesadas es explorar posibles programas y arquitecturas para un Centro de Bienestar Comunitario/Multicultural. Hoy nos centraremos en los “Mandatos de Diseño” que resultaron de las siete Sesiones de Escucha realizadas por On the Margins, para explorar cómo podría verse cada uno e imaginar cómo podrían situarse cada uno en relación con el otro en el sitio existente del Centro Comunitario. 5:30 PM
30 Mins
Familiarize/
Familializarse
Optional awareness walk / Caminata opcional de concientización.

Join some of our team members to walk the
site.

Únase a uno de los miembros de nuestro equipo
para recorrer el lugar.
6:00 PM BEGIN WORKSHOP 1 / TALLER 1
20 Mins
Welcome/
Bienvenida
Sign in, Receive Voting Dot stickers, enjoy
refreshments, first look at Image Boards
Regístrese, reciba calcomanías de Voting Dot,
disfrute de los refrigerios, vea por primera vez los
tableros de imágenes
10 Mins
Focus/
Enfoque
Project Introduction / Introducción al proyecto
Greeting by Marcy Flores
Recap by Dr. Danny Dominguez:

Listening Sessions and data collected by On the
Margins
Saludo de Marcy Flores
Resumen de Dr. Danny Domínguez:

Sesiones de escucha y datos recopilados por On the
Margins
10 Mins
Focus/
Enfoque
Site Introduction / Introducción al Sitio
Intro by Douglas Thornley & William Fee:

Review of Existing Site Conditions
Brief run-down of each Image Board
What to expect from Workshops 1 & 2
Introducción de Douglas Thornley y William Fee:

Revisión de las condiciones existentes
Breve resumen de cada Pancarta
Qué esperar de los talleres 1 y 2
Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center Workshop 1 Agenda PAGE 1 WORKSHOP 1 AGENDA
This bilingual agenda was
handed out to attendees of
Visioning Session 1.

D. VISIONING SESSION WORKSHOP HANDOUTS
Appendix D. Visioning
Session Workshop
Handouts

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
70 WORKSHOP 1 DESIGN

MANDATES
This double-sided letter
sized handout summarized
On the Margins’ Design
Mandates for attendees of
Visioning Session 1, in
English on one side and
Spanish on the other.

ON THE MARGINS’ LISTENING SESSION ‘DESIGN MANDATES’
Project: Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center / Proyecto: Centro Comunitario Multicultural de Healdsburg Subject: Workshop 1: Open House / Contenido: Taller 1 : Casa Abierta Date: October 16, 2024 6:00 - 7:30 pm / Fecha: 16 de Octubre de 2024 6:00 - 7:30 PM CONCLUSIONS AND DESIGN SUGGESTIONS:

Thanks to the comprehensive results and thematic analysis from the Listening sessions, the following 10 “design mandates” were gathered:

1. Multipurpose, Intergenerational Movement Spaces: Intentionally support the physical well-being of the community through multi-purpose sports fields, exercise gyms for personal fitness, and playgrounds/play spaces for youth.

2. Community Kitchen/Cafeteria: Establish a community-led and community-supported kitchen/cafeteria that allows for culinary practice and education, community food preparation, and encourages access to healthy meals at sliding-scale costs.

3. Participatory Mural Design: Engage with community members and local artists, especially LGBTQIA+ and BIPOC artists, in Healdsburg to co-create mural designs for the Multicultural Center that both represents the cultural diversity of the Healdsburg community and empowers residents to create positive impact in their communities.

4. Mixed-Sensory Engagement: The Multicultural center design should have spaces that vary in sensory engagement so visitors can either engage in loud, stimulating environments or quiet, relaxing spaces.

5. Arts, Crafts, Music: Create “maker spaces” or other community-led spaces for arts, crafts, and music practice; Emphasize cultural/traditional music and art practices as well as art practice for healing/well-being.

6. Environmental Justice: The Multicultural center should be environmentally sustainable, and should have intentional environmental design that both highlights native plants, traditional/cultural/medicinal plants, and native food plants; The space should reclaim environmental spaces and plants historically taken from BIPOC communities.

7. Multifaceted Educational Support: The Multicultural center should have a hub for intergenerational educational and career development support: academic support,“life skills” courses, and Career-Technical Education courses for youth; Literacy development, GED preparation, and Career Certification for adults and elders.

8. Community Building: Create spaces for community engagement, gathering, and cross-cultural belonging; Food, sports, parties/fiestas, and other mass gatherings should be supported and co-created with community members.

9. Computer Access and Education: The Multicultural center should be able to provide visitors with computer access and computer/coding classes for members in the community.

10. Prioritize Access, Autonomy, Accountability and Justice: Ensure that the Multicultural center is accessible to all (regardless of ability, cost, or personal background), uplifts community voices in directly designing the space, is accountable to the community (and the community is accountable for maintaining and supporting the center in return), and prioritizes justice for underserved and disinvested communities in Healdsburg.

Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center OtM Listening Session Design Mandates PAGE 1

CONCLUSIONES Y SUGERENCIAS DE DISEÑO:

Basado en aportes y análisis integrales de la comunidad, los siguientes principios básicos de diseño guiarán la creación del Centro Multicultural de Healdsburg:

1. Espacios multigeneracionales de movimiento y juego: Espacios diseñados para el bienestar físico para todas las edades, incluyendo canchas deportivas de usos múltiples, áreas de ejercicio y espacios de juego para niños y jóvenes.

2. Cocina/Cafetería Comunitaria: Una cocina/cafetería dirigida por la comunidad que fomenta las habilidades culinarias, la preparación de comidas compartidas y el acceso a alimentos saludables y asequibles.

3. Arte mural colaborativo: Asociaciones con artistas y miembros de la comunidad de Healdsburg, especialmente de las comunidades LGBTQIA+ y BIPOC, para cocrear murales que celebren la diversidad cultural y el empoderamiento.

4. Diseño sensorialmente consciente: Espacios que ofrecen distintos niveles de participación sensorial, desde vibrantes y estimulantes hasta tranquilos y calmantes, para adaptarse a las preferencias individuales.

5. Espacios para la expresión creativa: Áreas dedicadas a artes, artesanías y música dirigidas por la comunidad, enfatizando las tradiciones culturales y los beneficios terapéuticos de la creatividad.

6. Justicia Ambiental: Un compromiso con la sustentabilidad, con plantas nativas, plantas medicinales tradicionales y jardines comestibles. El diseño debe recuperar y restaurar espacios naturales históricamente tomados de las comunidades BIPOC.

7. Centro de aprendizaje permanente: Un centro para el aprendizaje intergeneracional y el desarrollo profesional, que ofrece apoyo académico, capacitación en habilidades para la vida, educación profesional/técnica y recursos para alfabetización, preparación para el GED y certificaciones.

8. Espacios de reunión comunitaria: Espacios flexibles diseñados para fomentar la interacción comunitaria, las reuniones y la conexión intercultural. Apoyo para eventos, celebraciones y actividades compartidas liderados por la comunidad.

9. Acceso a computadoras y alfabetización digital: Computadoras en el sitio y educación tecnológica, incluidas clases de codificación, accesibles para todos los miembros de la comunidad.

10. Acceso, autonomía, rendición de cuentas y justicia: El centro debe ser accesible física y financieramente para todos, y las voces de la comunidad deben ser fundamentales para su diseño y funcionamiento. Un compromiso con la responsabilidad mutua y la justicia para las comunidades desatendidas en Healdsburg.

Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center OtM Listening Session Design Mandates PAGE 2 D. VISIONING SESSION WORKSHOP HANDOUTS

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
71 AGENDA
Project: Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center / Proyecto: Centro Comunitario Multicultural de Healdsburg Subject: Workshop 2 / Contenido: Taller 2
Date: November 25th, 2024 6:00 - 7:30 pm / Fecha: 25 de noviembre de 2024 6:00 - 7:30 PM OVERVIEW:

The purpose of this stakeholder session is to design together your ideal layout for the programmatic elements of your Multicultural/Community Wellness Center, on the site of the existing Community Center. We will begin by reviewing the results from Workshop 1’s Dot Polling activity and then breakout into a site planning activity.

DESCRIPCIÓN GENERAL:

El propósito de esta sesión para las partes interesadas es diseñar juntos la disposición ideal para los elementos programáticos de su Centro de Bienestar Comunitario/Multicultural, en el sitio del Centro Comunitario existente. Comenzaremos revisando los resultados de la actividad de sondeo de puntos del Taller 1 y luego pasaremos a una actividad de planificación del sitio. 6:00 PM BEGIN WORKSHOP 2 / TALLER 2
20 Mins
Welcome/
Bienvenida
Sign in, receive handout sheets, enjoy
refreshments
Regístrese, reciba folletos y disfrute de
refrigerios.
10 Mins
Rewind/
Recapitulación
Project Recap / Resumen del proyecto
Greeting by Marcy Flores & Amy Ramirez
Recap of Workshop 1 by Dr. Danny Domínguez
& Douglas Thornley
Saludo de Marcy Flores & Amy Ramirez
Resumen del Taller 1 por Dr. Danny Domínguez &
Douglas Thornley
10 Mins
Focus/
Enfoque
Dot Polling Results / Resultados de la encuesta de puntos Review by Haley Mayes, Jin Kim & Karly
Behncke
Introduction to Site Planning Activity by Jin Kim
& Karly Behncke
Revisión por Haley Mayes, Jin Kim & Karly
Behncke
Introducción a la actividad de planificación de
sitio por Jin Kim & Karly Behncke
Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center Workshop 2 Agenda PAGE 1

THANK YOU FOR JOINING US / GRACIAS POR UNIRSE A NOSOTROS Stay tuned for more about the future of this project from the Healthcare Foundation of Northern Sonoma County.

Manténgase atento para obtener más información sobre el futuro de este proyecto de la Healthcare Foundation del Norte del Condado de Sonoma.
6:40 PM
45 Mins
Breakout/
Receso
Site Planning Activity / Actividad de planificación del sitio Split into groups to brainstorm your ideal
locations for Multicultural/Community
Wellness Center programs.

Work together to place each program Bubble
(e.g. “Ethnobotanical Garden” or “Music
Room”) in the location on the site plan where
you’d most like to have it.

Divídanse en grupos para pensar en las
ubicaciones ideales para los programas del
Centro de bienestar comunitario y multicultural.

Trabajen juntos para ubicar cada burbuja de
programa (por ejemplo, “Jardín etnobotánico” o
“Sala de música”) en el lugar del plano del sitio
donde más les gustaría ubicarla.
7:25 PM
5 Mins
Reconvene/
Reunirse
Final Wrap-Up / Resumen final
Closing announcements Anuncios de clausura
7:30 PM ADJOURN / APLAZAR
Healdsburg Multicultural/Community Wellness Center Workshop 2 Agenda PAGE 2 WORKSHOP 2 AGENDA
This bilingual agenda was
handed out to attendees of
Visioning Session 2.

D. VISIONING SESSION WORKSHOP HANDOUTS

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
72 HEA

LDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.071557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
QuietStudy/ReadingSpaces|Espaciostranquilosdeestudio/lectura Relatesto
Design
Mandates
4,7,10...

Serelaciona
conlos
Mandatos
dediseño
4,7,10...

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM
Appendix E. Visioning
Session 1 Imagery

PROGRAM IMAGERY

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
73 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.081557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
MusicRoom|Salademúsica
RelatestoDesign
Mandates4,5,8...

Serelacionacon
losMandatosde
diseño4,5,8...

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
74 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.091557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
LifeSkills/CareerSupportSpaces|Espaciosdeapoyoprofesional/habilidadesparalavida RelatestoDesign
Mandates7,9,10...

SerelacionaconlosMandatosdediseño7,9,10...

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
75 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.101557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
MultipurposeRoom|SalóndeUsosMúltiples
RelatestoDesignMandates1,4,8...

SerelacionaconlosMandatosdediseño1,4,8...

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
76 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.111557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
CommunityKitchen|Cocinacomunitaria
RelatestoDesign
Mandates2&8...

Serelacionacon
losMandatosde
diseño2&8...

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
77 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.121557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
Arts&CraftsRoom|Saladeartesymanualidades
Relatesto
Design
Mandates
4,5,7...

Serelaciona
conlos
Mandatos
dediseño
4,5,7...

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
78 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.131557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
StudySpaces|Espaciosdeestudio
RelatestoDesign
Mandates4,7,10...

Serelaciona
conlos
Mandatos
dediseño
4,7,10..

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
79 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.141557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
Classrooms|Aulas
RelatestoDesignMandates7,8,9...

Serelaciona
conlos
Mandatos
dediseño
7,8,9...

E.1 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — PROGRAM

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
80 HE

ALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
01 Multipurpose, Intergenerational Movement Spaces | Espacios Multiusos de Movimiento Intergenerational 15 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

DESIGN MANDATE

IMAGERY

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
81 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
02 Community Kitchen and Cafeteria | Cocina y Cafetería Comunitaria 16 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
82 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
17 NTS
03 Participatory Mural Design | Diseño Participativo de Murales E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
83 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
04 Mixed Sensory Engagement | Estimulación Sensorial Mixta 18 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
84 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
05 Arts, Crafts, Music | Artes, Manualidades, Música
19 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
85 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
06 Environmental Justice | Justicia Ambiental
20 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
86 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
07 Multifaceted Educational Support | Apoyo Educativo Multifacético 21 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
87 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
08 Community Building Spaces | Espacios Para el Desarrollo Comunitario 22 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
88 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
09 Computer Access and Education | Acceso a la Computadora y Educación 23 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

APPENDIX
89 HEALDSBURGMULTICULTURAL/

COMMUNITYWELLNESSCENTER
PROGRAMIMAGERY|IMÁGENESDELPROGRAMA
SCALE:
10/16/24
NTS
DATE:

BOARDNO.001557HEALDSBURGAVENUE
WORKSHOP1
PROGRAM IMAGERY | IMÁGENES DE PROGRAMACIÓN
10 Prioritize Access, Autonomy, Accountability, and Justice | Priorizar el Acceso, la Autonomía, la Responsabilidad y la Justicia 24 NTS
E.2 VISIONING SESSION 1 IMAGERY — DESIGN MANDATES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & REFERENCES

AUTHORS, DEDICATION, FUNDING, LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT,

PARTNERS & SOURCE REFERENCES

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
91 Researchers & Authors — Listening Sessions
Daniela G. Domínguez, Psy.D. is an Associate Professor at the University of San Francisco's Counseling Psychology Department and the founder of On the Margins. She specializes in Latinx mental health, antiracism, migrant justice, and trauma-informed care.

Her research focuses on understanding how Latinx communities heal from trauma and access positive health.

She uses critical and political methodologies, grounded in Critical Race Theory, to challenge traditional research, assessment, and evaluation paradigms. She encourages psychologists to move away from Eurocentric epistemologies and towards a critical race epistemology that recognizes knowledge as shaped by interlocking systems of oppression. Her work has earned her numerous professional, academic, and community awards.

Addison Pickrell is a Research Associate working at On the Margins and a second-year college student in Mathematics at the University of California, Berkeley. She specializes in text mining methods for social science, systems thinking and theory, and research justice methodology. Her work focuses on envisioning spaces, systemic change, and cultural shifts that uplift and center marginalized communities. Her work builds on participatory and pluralistic democratic structures, and emphasizes economic, racial, social, educational, and healing justice.

Partners
The Healdsburg Multicultural Center Project (HMCP) is the result of a dynamic coalition between diverse organizations committed to community development, healthcare access, and justice. Coalition partners include Goring & Straja Architects, Carducci Associates, the Healthcare Foundation Northern Sonoma County, Alliance Medical Center, Corazón Healdsburg, and On the Margins. Photography in this report is from Will Bucquoy.

Researchers & Authors — Visioning Sessions
The founders of Goring & Straja Architects set out in 1996, with offices in the San Francisco Bay Area and Milan Italy, to build on their experience working together delivering projects of exceptional quality. They started their careers working for the late William Turnbull in San Francisco and from that grew their passions: creativity, rigor, sustainability, and a commitment to client and community participation. Their expertise ranges from public and other community facilities, hospitality projects and wineries, to retail and higher education. Common threads that weave through their work are a drive to create uplifting, memorable and meaningful designs that are responsive to their clients’ needs, an inclusive and open design process, a commitment to leave a positive mark on communities where they have worked, and to touch the land and the environment as gently and as positively as possible.

Carducci Associates combines creative and technical ability in landscape architecture, planning and urban design. They have worked with the City Healdsburg on Giorgi Park, Recreation Park, West Plaza, Saggio Hills Park, and previous planning studies for the Healdsburg Community Center. They focus on clients’ needs, creating opportunities for connections between people and nature. They design landscapes that express an artistry and sensitivity to the interaction of social and natural systems, are purposeful, buildable and sustainable.

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

H E A L D S B U R G M U LT I C U LT U R A L C E N T E R

LISTENING SESSIONS
92 Dedication
This report is dedicated to the residents of Healdsburg, whose generous contributions of time, talent, and diverse experiences made the Healdsburg Multicultural Center Project possible.

Funding
This transformative project would not have been possible without the generous support and commitment of Providence Health. Their dedication to improving community health and wellbeing is evident in their attention to and significant investment in the Healdsburg Multicultural Center Project.

Acknowledgment
Healdsburg is located on the unceded ancestral lands of the Southern Pomo people. We acknowledge their enduring presence and profound connection to this place, recognizing them as the original stewards of the land. We are committed to honoring their legacy and supporting their inherent sovereignty. This commitment necessitates actively dismantling the ongoing legacies of colonization and systemic oppression, including settler colonialism, patriarchy, and white supremacy – forces that continue to perpetuate injustice.

References — Listening Sessions
DEI Plan (2023). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https:// www.ci.healdsburg.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/17293/Final-ALLP-DEI-ReportSPA-101023 American Institute of Architects. (1982). Healdsburg R/UDAT. Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https:// www.brikbase.org/sites/default/files/dat_1982_Healdsburg_compressed.pdf Dominguez, D., & Pickrell, A. C. (2023). Nuestra Comunidad Sana.

Lewis, K. (2021). A portrait of Sonoma County: 2021 update. Measure of America, Social Science Research Council.

U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. American Community Survey, ACS 1- Year Supplemental Estimates, 2022, https://data.census.gov/table? q=Healdsburg&amp;y=2022.

TMO Guide. (2019, May 26). WE1S. https://we1s.ucsb.edu/research/we1s-tools-andsoftware/topic-model-observatory/tmo-guide/

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore) PUBLISHED JANUARY 2025

9.C.b
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Healdsburg Multicultural Center Report (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

9.C.c
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Public Comment (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

9.C.c
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Public Comment (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

9.C.c
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Public Comment (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore)

9.C.c
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Public Comment (4645 : Multicultural Center Concepts and Grant Funding from Supervisor Gore) 4/16/2025 – Page 1

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
(NOTE: The schedule is tentative and subject to change pending final publication and posting of the City Council meeting agenda) May 5, 2025 Public Service Recognition Week Proclamation Housing Element Work Group Appreciation Proclamation
Proclamation Recognizing May 2025 as Bike Month & Bike to Work Day Employee Anniversaries – Jorge Hernandez (20 years), Mark Themig (10 years) and Michell Violetti (5 years)
Investment Report – March 2025
Disbursement Report – March 2025
Professional Services Agreement with Alameida Architecture for Victory Apartments 2 nd Reading – District Elections
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Adopt Fiscal Year 26-27 City Council Goals
Notice of Completion – Fire Substation
Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Planning Grant for Healdsburg SMART Station Area Professional Services Agreement with Coastland Civil Engineering Award Test Wells for ASR Potential Project
Funding Commitment to Burbank for the Dry Creek Commons Acceptance of Mill District Subdivision Improvements
Healdsburg Avenue Complete Streets – Project Update
SCTCA Grant Priority List
Selection of the Official City Plant, Flower or Tree
Three Council Identified Priorities for Mayors & Councilmembers Association May 19, 2025 Public Works Week Proclamation
Affordable housing Month Proclamation

12.1.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Agenda Planning Sheet (4829 : Future Agenda Items - April 7, 2025) 4/16/2025 – Page 2
Fire Hazard Severity Zones – 2
nd Reading
Weed Abatement
Mill District Project (Replay Healdsburg, LLC; Eden Mill District, LP) – Annual DA Review North Village Project (CCS Healdsburg, LLC; Kendal at Sonoma, A Zen Inspired Community; BHDC North Village, LLC) – Annual DA Review
Saggio Hills Affordable Housing Project (Freebird Development Company, LLC) – Annual DA Review Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plan Update
Sonoma County Funding for Community Center Improvements SB1 List of Streets Projects
Notice of Completion for Recycled Water Pipeline Project Laura Fish Somersal Park Phase 1 Schematic Design Review FY2024-25 Q3 Financial Update
HTID Annual Report Update from the Chamber
Electrification Energy Demand Forecast
Speed Limit Reduction Ordinance – 1st reading
June 2, 2025 Pride Month Proclamation
Elder Abuse Awareness Month Proclamation
Gun Violence Awareness Month Proclamation
GANN Appropriation Limit
Villa Chanticleer Lease Amendment - Utilities
Speed Limit Reduction Ordinance – 2nd Reading
Electric Vehicle (EV) Charger Program Participation and Results June 16, 2025 Juneteenth Day Proclamation
Disabilities Pride Month Proclamation
FY2025-26 Investment Policy
Reach for Home Quarterly Update
Fletcher Studio Contract Amendment - Laura Fish Somersal Park Design Development

12.1.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Agenda Planning Sheet (4829 : Future Agenda Items - April 7, 2025) 4/16/2025 – Page 3
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
Weed Abatement Public Hearing
Badger Park Redevelopment CEQA and Master Plan Approval Public Hearing on Staffing Vacancies to Comply with Assembly Bill 2561 Title Six Implementation Plan Presentation

12.1.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Agenda Planning Sheet (4829 : Future Agenda Items - April 7, 2025)

← All documents from this meeting