Hemet City Council
November 14, 2023

20.H

9/25/2023 8:17:12 AM Page 13 of 18

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or loca l legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adopt ion of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRIMARY TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION (STATES)

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lowe r tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to particip ate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participa nts, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/).

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS —

PRIMARY TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS

20.H

9/25/2023 8:17:12 AM Page 14 of 18

1. The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOWER TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participa nts, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website ( https://www.sam.gov/).

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION —

LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

20.H

9/25/2023 8:17:12 AM Page 15 of 18

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufacture d products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory qualit y, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justific ation for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

No employee, officer, or agent of a State or its subrecipient who is authorized in an official capacity to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving any subaward, including contracts or subcontracts, i n connection with this grant shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subawar d. Such a financial or personal interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a fina ncial or personal interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. a. The code or standards shall provide that the recipient's officers, employees, or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential subawardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts.
b. The code or standards shall establish penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulations.

2. The recipient shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written code or standards of conduct.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

No State or its subrecipient, including its officers, employees, or agents, shall perform or continue to perform under a gran t or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of any related past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated by NHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonably possible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to NHTSA. The disclosure shall include a description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflict.

2. NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from the recipient. If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriate provisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.

3. Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present, or currently planned organizational, financial, contractual, or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or with an organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are related to this award. The interest(s) that requir e disclosure include those of any recipient, affiliate, proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor, and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shall be limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning more than a 20 percent interest in a recipient, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient who are responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or action can have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.

PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.

20.H

9/25/2023 8:17:12 AM Page 16 of 18

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website (www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving comp any- owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or re-evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.

20.H

9/25/2023 8:17:12 AM Page 17 of 18

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADDING OR UPDATING GEMS USERS

1. Each agency is allowed a total of FIVE (5) GEMS Users.

2. GEMS Users listed on this form will be authorized to login to GEMS to complete and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs) and reimbursement claims.

3. Complete the form if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s).

4. The Grant Director must sign this form and return it with the Grant Agreement.

CURRENT GEMS USER(S)

1. Gabriel Gomez
Title: Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: (951) 634-3037
Email: [email protected]

2. Martha Martinez
Title: Management Assistant Media Contact: No
Phone: (951) 765-2409
Email: [email protected]

3. Dan Reinbolt
Title: Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: 951-765-3725
Email: [email protected]

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
OTS-55 Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access Exhibit C

GRANT NUMBER
PT24086

GRANT DETAILS
Grant Number: PT24086
Agency Name: Hemet Police Department
Grant Title: Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Agreement Total: $115,000.00
Authorizing Official: Eddie Pust
Fiscal Official: Martha Martinez
Grant Director: Gabriel Gomez

20.H

9/25/2023 8:17:12 AM Page 18 of 18

Complete the below information if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s)

GEMS User 1
Add/Change {{[]c11_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[] c12_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c1_es_:signer1}} No{{[]c2_es_:signer1}} {{UserName1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle1_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone1_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 2
Add/Change {{[]c13_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c14_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c3_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c4_es_:signer1}} {{UserName2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle2_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone2_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 3
Add/Change {{[]c15_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c16_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c5_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c6_es_:signer1}} {{UserName3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle3_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone3_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 4
Add/Change {{[]c17_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c18_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c8_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c7_es_:signer1}} {{UserName4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle4_es_:signer1 }}

Name

Job Title
{{UserEmail4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone4_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 5
Add/Change {{[]c19_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c20_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c9_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c10_es_:signer1}} {{UserName5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle5_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone5_es_:signer1 }}

Email address

Phone number
Form completed by: {{Sig_es_:signer1:signature}} Date: {{Dte1_es_:signer1:date}}

As a signatory I hereby authorize the listed individual(s) to represent and have GEMS user access. {{Sig_es_:signer2:signature}} {{Name1_es_:signer2:fullname }} Signature Name
{{Dte2_es_:signer2:date}} Grant Director
Date Title

Gabriel Gomez (Oct 9, 2023 08:31 PDT)
Gabriel Gomez
✔
Dan Reinbolt
Patrol Lieutenant
[email protected]
(951) 765-2400
Oct 9, 2023
Gabriel Gomez (Oct 9, 2023 08:32 PDT)
Gabriel Gomez
Gabriel Gomez
Oct 9, 2023

20.H

Grant Agreement - PT24086
Final Audit Report 2023-10-10
Created: 2023-09-25
By: Stephanie Spaid ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAt14vVmrHNluRu-duT-M80jmmffGhfO6_ "Grant Agreement - PT24086" History
Document created by Stephanie Spaid ([email protected]) 2023-09-25 - 3:17:27 PM GMT
Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2023-09-25 - 3:17:38 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-10-08 - 5:42:40 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-10-09 - 3:23:08 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Gabriel Gomez 2023-10-09 - 3:31:23 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Gabriel Gomez ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-09 - 3:31:25 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2023-10-09 - 3:31:27 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-10-09 - 3:31:46 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Gabriel Gomez 2023-10-09 - 3:32:18 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Gabriel Gomez ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-09 - 3:32:20 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Martha Martinez ([email protected]) for signature 2023-10-09 - 3:32:21 PM GMT

20.H

Email viewed by Martha Martinez ([email protected]) 2023-10-10 - 4:35:49 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Martha Martinez ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-10 - 4:38:43 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2023-10-10 - 4:38:45 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-10-10 - 10:11:05 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Eddie J. Pust 2023-10-10 - 10:11:28 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Eddie J. Pust ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2023-10-10 - 10:11:30 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Carolyn Vu ([email protected]) for signature 2023-10-10 - 10:11:31 PM GMT
Email viewed by Carolyn Vu ([email protected])
2023-10-10 - 10:51:06 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Carolyn Vu ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-10 - 10:51:15 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) for signature 2023-10-10 - 10:51:16 PM GMT
Email viewed by Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) 2023-10-10 - 11:12:08 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-10 - 11:12:18 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2023-10-10 - 11:12:18 PM GMT

20.H

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Nov 14 2023
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Mark Prestwich, City Manager
Charles Russell, Public Works Operations Manager;
☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☒ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

Review and Discuss Recommended Options for Enhanced Arterial Street Sweeping in Commercial Areas
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Review and Discuss the Staff's Recommendation for Additional Street Sweeping.

2. Approve to Increase Hemet Arterial Sweeping, Additional Hemet Increased Arterial Sweeping and Center Median/Left-Turn Lane Sweeping.

3. Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving Additional Street and Center Median/Left-Turn Lane Sweeping with any Modifications Determined in the Discussion.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Hemet and CR&R Inc. (CR&R) entered into a Franchise Agreement for Comprehensive Refuse Services on October 11, 2011. CR&R Inc. began providing services on December 1, 2011.

The Franchise Agreement provides that CR&R will provide a complete sweep of all publicly maintained streets within the City, including Highway 74 and 79, twice per month, at no cost to the City. The Franchise Agreement also requires the City to assign CR&R and for CR&R to assume and perform all agreements between the City and Caltrans for the sweeping of Highway 74 and 79, and that CR&R shall be solely responsible for the performance of required services and shall be entitled to sole remuneration for the provisions of such services from Caltrans.

the for Agreement Maintenance Delegated a into Caltrans and Hemet of City The entered Maintenance of State Highways in the City of Hemet on June 28, 2018, delegating the City to sweep Highway 74 & 79, one time every two weeks, including the median islands, painted center median and left turn pockets located within the City of Hemet.

CR&R is currently performing the street sweeping services described in the Franchise Agreement and the Delegated Maintenance Agreement.

21.A

ANALYSIS:

Currently, CR&R sweeps city streets Monday through Friday. The City is divided into sections that are swept during the first and third week of each month or the second and fourth week of each month.

Highways 74 and 79 are swept every other week.

City Staff have identified streets located in the commercial corridors (areas that are highly traveled and surrounded by commercial properties) and now recommend that these streets receive additional scheduled sweeping. The tables below provide the names of streets, the section of the street to receive additional sweeping, the recommended additional times to be swept, and the cost of the additional street sweeping service. Exhibits mapping the recommended augmented street sweeping services are attached to this report.

Increased Hemet Arterial Sweeping - Staff has determined that these commercial corridors are in the most need of additional sweeping. This additional level of service will increase the sweeping schedule from two times per month to four times per month. The table below details the additional costs for these services outside the scope of the existing franchise agreements.

Additional Hemet Increased Arterial Sweeping -Staff has determined that the following commercial corridors will benefit from an enhanced level of sweeping. This additional level of service will increase the sweeping schedule of the specified street segments from two times per month to four times per month. The table below details the additional costs for these services outside the scope of the existing franchise agreements.

Center Median/Left-Turn Lanes - Staff has determined that the commercial corridors identified below have center median and left-turn lanes that should be swept on a quarterly basis. Sweeping

21.A

services for the center median and left-turn pockets are not included in the existing franchise agreement and not performed currently.

DISCUSSION:

On April 18, 2023, City of Hemet staff representing the Police, Fire, Code Enforcement, Public Works, City Attorney's Office, and the Office of the City Manager met to discuss strategies to clean and beautify the community. Following the meeting, Hemet staff was tasked with preparing recommendations for the City Manager in support of advancing efforts that would result in a cleaner, safer city. Concepts were reviewed, and feedback was provided to the City Council Clean Up/Graffiti Ad Hoc Committee. The resulting draft strategy, branded the Safe and Clean Streets Initiative and which was incorporated into the City Council's Strategic Plan Fiscal Year 2023-24 "Action Items", promotes an accelerated series of initiatives to beautify and position the City of Hemet for increased prosperity and investment.

One of the "Clean" strategies identified was to consider enhancing the street sweeping service levels in Commercial Corridors. Additional street sweeping will improve the cleanliness and appearance of the City. Staff recommends that the City Council add the additional commercial corridor street and center median/ left-turn pocket sweeping to improve the cleanliness and appearance of the designated corridors.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

1. On October 11, 2011, City Council approved the Exclusive Franchise Agreement for Comprehensive Refuse Services with CR&R Inc.

2. On May 29, 2018, City Council approved the Street Sweeping Delegated Maintenance Agreement for Maintenance of State Highway 74 and 79 in the City of Hemet with Caltrans.

3. On May 29, 2018, City Council approved the Street Sweeping Implementation Agreement with CR&R Inc.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

21.A

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

Objective 1: Enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total cost for Increased Hemet Arterial Sweeping, Additional Hemet Increased Arterial Sweeping, and Center Median/Left-Turn Lane Sweeping is $31,729 per year. This cost could be funded through the City's General Fund or by incorporating the cost into the CR&R Franchise Agreement rate structure. If the City Council approves the increased services, the City Manager recommends authorizing the Administrative Services Director to establish additional appropriations in the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Approve all recommended enhanced street sweeping services for the identified commercial areas.

2. Approve a portion of the recommended enhanced sweeping service for the identified commercial areas.

3. Do not approve any recommended enhanced sweeping service in the City's main commercial areas and provide staff alternative direction.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1: Resolution Street Sweeping
Attachment 2: Increased Hemet Arterial Sweeping
Attachment 3: Additional Hemet Increased Arterial Sweeping Attachment 4: Center Median/Left-Turn Lanes

21.A

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX 1
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

CITY OF HEMET

HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xxx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ENHANCED

SERVICE LEVEL OF STREET SWEEPING FOR HEMET

ARTERIALS AND CENTER MEDIAN/LEFT-TURN LANES
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the City of Hemet and CR&R Inc. entered into a Franchise Agreement for Comprehensive Refuse Services on October 11, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Franchise Agreement provides that CR&R Inc. will provide a complete sweep of all publicly maintained streets within the City, including Highway 74 and 79, two times per month, at no cost to the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Hemet and Caltrans entered into a Delegated Maintenance Agreement for Maintenance of State Highway in the City of Hemet on June 28, 2018; and
WHEREAS, CR&R currently sweeps city streets two times per month and Highway 74 & 79 every other week; and
WHEREAS, Staff has identified streets located in the commercial corridors and is now recommending that these streets receive additional scheduled sweeping; and WHEREAS, adding staff’s recommended additional scheduled sweeping will increase the sweeping schedule from two times a month to four times a month; and

21.A

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX 2
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHEREAS, the Safe and Clean Initiative, promotes an accelerated series of initiatives to beautify and position the City of Hemet for increased prosperity and investment.

WHEREAS, the total cost for Increased Hemet Arterial Sweeping, Additional Hemet Increased Arterial Sweeping and Center Median/Left-Turn Lane Sweeping is $31,729.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2.Authorize staff’s recommendations to Increase Hemet Arterial Sweeping, Additional Hemet Increased Arterial Sweeping and Center Median/Left-Turn Lane Sweeping.

SECTION 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the recommendation.

SECTION 4. This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

21.A

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX 3
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 2023. ____________________________
Joe Males, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

21.A

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XXX 4
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 14th day of November, 2023, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

21.A

IncreasedHemetArterialSweepingV

EATONA V
STATE‘ST
’FRU|TV A|;EA V
|—|MENLOA V—
I-(DLIJILEZ<(D
o'AKLANDA V 5.:5T.‘DEVONSHIRE-A V DEVONSH|RE'A VLATHAMA VA CAWSTONA VCOLUMBIAST3.CORNELLST

FLORIDAA V
5E’<’°.PI‘I‘

ACACIAA V ACACIAA V
LYONA VGIRARDSTSANDERSONA V\]]iERT‘ST'BUENA_VlSTAST5ST\ClNTO_ST SANTAFl
JOHNS-TON-A VSTET.rS0NA V STETSON‘A V0StreetSweepingLocation'—rRailroadsNumberArterialNameFromToTotalMileageDoubleTotalMilesPerWeekTwiceaMonthCostperYear1 FloridaCawstonColumbia4 8 8 16 $8,832SanJacintoAcaciaMenlo1 2 2 4 $2,208HarvardKimballLatham0.30.6 0.6 1.2 $662FrontStateHarvard0.20.4 0.4 0.8 $442 0 1,0002000StateThorntonFruitvale2.5 5 5 10 $5520 1=TFee‘1:3o,oooStetsonBuenaVistaCawston2.65.2 5.2 $5741 NSource:CountyofRiverside,CityofHemetTotals: $23,405 V:\Tasks\16_Street_Sweeping_20230906\Maps : Roads
1 Highways-StreetSweepingRoute

STATEST

21.A

AdditionalHemetIncreasedArterialSweeping
FRU|T,V A|;E-A V

SANTAFEST

MENLO-A V

CAWSTONA V
I-U)‘.5SU)OAKIIANDA V I-(DDD!E(DDEVONSHIRE-A V DEVONSHIREA V

KIRBYST

LATHAMA VFLORIDAA V
RDST
KIMBZI-\L’LA VACACIAA V
STATE‘STSANJACINTOST>9_QGIRA>-2AVISTAST
U) BUENGlEBERT'EVl—l_—YONA V3;llJF‘SANTAFESTgr
' 3‘I ‘[LI/|—|II —L
- 1 J0..- _ ——
ArterialName TotalMileageTotalMilesPerWeekTwiceaMonthCostperYear 0Stts _LfreeweeInocaIOFILathamEM $883 T P9l—rRailroadslathamEM 8883 _ Roads
‘
EM $883 1 HighwaysKlmball $662 Oslleelsweeplnsme

SANDERSONA V
KlmballEM $662Klmball $662 1:24,0007 $1,104 N
-f’-11222-—j ‘—--2‘—1Ij————l

21.A

21.A

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Nov 14 2023
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Mark Prestwich, City Manager
Noah Rau, Public Works Director/City Engineer;
☐ Receive and File ☐ Consent Calendar ☒ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:

Review the Results of the Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) Completed by STC Traffic, Inc. and Consider Options Related to Potential Changes to City Speed Limits Based on the E&TS; and Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California Acting in its capacity as the Legislative Body of the City of Hemet Updating Section 78-69 of Article III of the Hemet Municipal Code
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

1. Review the Results of the citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) Completed by STC Traffic, Inc.

2. Introduce and waive the first reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Acting in its capacity as the Legislative Body of the City of Hemet Updating Section 78-69 (b) of Article III of the Hemet Municipal Code.

BACKGROUND:

The Public Works Engineering Division is responsible for periodically preparing or assisting in the preparation of an engineering study of the prevailing speeds and reviewing the traffic conditions of City roads.

One primary purpose of the Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is to establish a reasonable and safe operating speed for each specific section of roadway in the City that is in turn used to set enforceable speed limits for these roadway segments.

Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) require that certain local speed limits be determined based on the E&TS reports and that these speed limits are established by local ordinance. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code requires that the E&TS studies be conducted every five years where enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of a radar device that measures the speed of moving vehicles. The five-year application of the survey findings can be extended to seven years if the officer using the radar/laser device is properly certified in its use, and if

21.B

the used electronic device was calibrated within three years of the alleged violations. Additionally, the E&TS studies can be extended for three more years if a registered engineer determines that no significant changes have occurred on the roadway after seven years.

The City last conducted an ET&S study in 2019, though the study was not a comprehensive Citywide effort, and the Council did not adopt any of the recommended changes of that study.

On January 10, 2023, the City Council awarded a professional services agreement to STC Traffic Inc. to complete a citywide E&TS.

ANALYSIS:

Speed limit zones and their required postings are established to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behaviors of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous, drivers. The limits identified are based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway reasonably and safely.

Speed zones are also established to advise drivers of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits include:

Road characteristics, shoulder conditions, grade, alignment, and sight distance Pace
Roadside development and environment
Parking practices and pedestrian activity
Reported crash experience for a 12-month period
Currently adopted speed limits

If after completing an E&TS, a local authority finds the existing speed limit to be more than reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the E&TS that established that speed limit.

Local streets, or a street or road that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road Systems Maps," and are approved by the Federal Highway Administration, are exempt from the study and do not require an E&TS.

DISCUSSION:

Speed evaluation data was collected on 152 different roadway segments along 41 different roadways across the City of Hemet.

The survey concluded that 111 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes. Two segments are recommended for speed limit decreases. Eight segments which are currently not posted with a speed limit, are recommended to be posted at speeds ranging from 25 mph to 50 mph.

Thirty-one segments are recommended for speed limit increases. All recommendations can be found in the attached E&TS report (Attachment 2). A summary table describing the speed limit increases is presented below. Twenty-six of the thirty-one segments with proposed speed limit increases are five

21.B

miles per hour while the remaining five segments with proposed speed limit increases are ten miles per hour.

21.B

Staff recommends that all of the results and recommendations of the current citywide E&TS be adopted by the Council including the 31 identified speed limit increases. If there are specific segments selected to remain posted as they currently exist and not increase in accordance with the E&TS, these segments would essentially become unenforceable.

If the Council approves the recommendation to update speed limits for the 38 street segments identified in the ET&S Survey, which are subject to different speed limits, the speed limits for those segments will then be enforceable.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

On January 10, 2023, the City Council adopted a Resolution awarding a Professional Services Agreement to STC Traffic, Inc. to conduct a citywide E&TS.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.

Objective 4: Increase employee retention by training and creating a positive workplace.

Objective 5: Streamline fire prevention coordination efforts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Updating the speed limit for the affected segments of City streets will cost approximately $4,000.

Additional appropriations are not being requested, as this activity will be absorbed in the 2023-24 operating budget.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Approve the proposed changes to speed limits as provided in the E&TS report.

2. Report with E&TS the in as limits provided to changes proposed the Approve speed modifications to specific street segments.

3. Do not approve any proposed changes to speed limits as provided in the E&TS report

4. Provide alternative direction to the City Manager.

REVIEWED BY LEGAL:
☒ Staff report☒ Resolution
☐ Ordinance☐ Agreement
ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 2 - Hemet 2023 Speed Survey_2023-11-06
Speed Limit Ordinance 2023v3(Final)

21.B

City of Hemet
November 2023
Final
Engineering and Traffic Survey
for Speed Limits

21.B

Table of Contents

City of Hemet
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

Prepared for: The City of Hemet

Submitted By: STC Traffic Inc.

November 2023
Final
445 E Florida Ave, Hemet, CA 92543
5973 Avenida Encinas #218, Carlsbad, CA 92008

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits i

City of Hemet

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION .................................................................................. III 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4

1.1 Regulations and Guidelines ...................................................................................................... 4

1.2 Methods for Estimating Speed Limits ....................................................................................... 5

1.2.1 Basic Speed Law (CVC 22350) ................................................................................................... 6

1.2.2 Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352) ..................................................................................... 6

1.2.3 Establishment of Speed Zones .................................................................................................. 6 2 SPEED SURVEY LOCATIONS ................................................................................. 7 3 METHODOLOGY FOR ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ....................................... 16

3.1 Speed Survey Procedures ....................................................................................................... 16

3.2 Rounding Speed Limits in Relation to Free-Flowing Traffic (CVC 22358.6) ............................ 17

3.3 Retaining or Restoring Speed Limit (CVC 22358.8) ................................................................ 17

3.4 Business Activity District (CVC 22358.9) ................................................................................. 17

3.5 Local Street Exemptions (CVC 40802) .................................................................................... 18

3.6 Other Considerations .............................................................................................................. 19

3.7 Radar Collection Time Frame ................................................................................................. 19 4 ANALYSIS FACTORS ............................................................................................. 20

4.1 Speed Data ............................................................................................................................. 20

4.2 Accident History ..................................................................................................................... 21 5 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................. 22

5.1 Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes" ................................................................................. 22

5.2 Locations of Speed Limit Changes .......................................................................................... 27

5.3 Summary of Recommendations ............................................................................................. 32

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits ii

City of Hemet

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1 Study Segment Locations ............................................................................................................. 8 Figure 2-2 Existing Speed Limit Postings ..................................................................................................... 15 Figure 5-1 Study Segment Speed Limit Changes ......................................................................................... 30 Figure 5-2 Study Segment Recommended Speed Limits ............................................................................ 31

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 List of Study Segments .................................................................................................................. 9 Table 5-1 Locations Recommended for No Speed Limit Changes .............................................................. 22 Table 5-2 Locations Recommended for Decreasing Speed Limit................................................................ 27 Table 5-3 Location Currently Not Posted Recommended for Posting ........................................................ 27 Table 5-4 Locations Recommended for Speed Limit Increases .................................................................. 28

LIST OF APPENDICIES
Appendix A ........................................................................................................... Data Package by Segment Appendix B ............................................................................................. CVC Sections 22358.6 and 22358.8 Appendix C .................................................................................... Previous Speed Survey Summary Sheets

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits iii

City of Hemet
TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 4

City of
1 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with procedures established by the State of California, this Engineering and Traffic Survey has been developed for the City of Hemet as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City. The work provided herein was authorized by the City and was performed by the engineering consulting firm STC Traffic, Inc.

This document is an update and includes the locations identified in previous Engineering and Traffic Surveys adopted by City Council . There have been changes to some of the street’s characteristics since the previous surveys, and some segments have now been merged with preceding or subsequent segments where characteristics were considered the same. S tudy segments have been updated to reflect these changes.

The requirement to perform an Engineering and Traffic Survey for speed limits is based on the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The goal of the Engineering and Traffic Survey is to identify the roadways to determine if conditions have changed where current speed limits should be modified.

1.1 Regulations and Guidelines
CVC Section 40802 states that at least once every five (5), seven (7) or fourteen (14) years, states and local agencies should re-evaluate non-statuary speed limits on segments of their roadways. Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB43) was approved by the Governor of California on October 8, 2021 and became effective on January 1, 2022. AB43 is an act to amend and add sections to the CVC. The bill authorizes:
› Local authorities to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrian groups. › Prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH to be established on state highways located in any business or residence district.
› A lowered speed limit on a section of highway contiguous to a business activity district. › Caltrans and local authority to declare speed limit of 20 or 15 MPH. › The period that a speed limit is justified by a traffic and engineering survey has changed from 10 years to 14 years.

Recent changes to the CVC are summarized in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) 2014 Edition, Revision 7 (effective March 10, 2023 ). The policy and procedure for setting speed limits in California states that Engineering and Traffic Surveys must be performed with the use of radar or other approved electronic devices if the use of radar is to be employed to enforce speed limits.

Per the CVC Section 40802, a "speed trap" is either of the following:
1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. 2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 5

City of
device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.

The definition of an Engineering and Traffic Survey is contained in CVC Section 627 and is as follows:

Engineering and Traffic Survey, as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by State and local authorities. An Engineering and Traffic Survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Accident Records.
3) Highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. 4) Residential Density.
5) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

Per CVC Section 627 (c)(1) Residential Density is defined as, where any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

A. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

B. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

C. The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).

1.2 Methods for Estimating Speed Limits
This section provides details on the methods available for estimating speed limits and includes relevant references to the CVC. The CVC has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general understanding of the "Basic Speed Law,” and "Prima Facie Speed Limits".

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 6

City of

1.2.1 Basic Speed Law (CVC 22350)
All fifty states base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California, CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as:
“No Person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time -to-time and place- to-place and, therefore, no set of fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist will constantly adjust driving behavior to fit the conditions they encounter. They must learn to do this with minimal assistance from the police. The Basic Speed Law is founded on the belief that a majority of motorists are able to modify their driving behavior properly, as long as they are aware of the conditions around them.

1.2.2 Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352)
All other speed limits are prima facie limits which, "on the face of it", are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. A driver may exceed any prima facie limit if it is safe to do so under prevailing conditions. However, when a police officer cites a driver for exceeding a prima facie speed limit, it is up to the driver to prove, if he can, that he was driving in a reasonable and prudent manner under the existing conditions and did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law. The opportunity given to the driver to exceed a prima facie speed limit when it is safe to do so recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic, weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times.

Certain prima facie limits are automatically established by law (CVC 22352), including a 15 mph speed limit in alleys, blind intersections, blind railroad crossing, and the 25 mph limit in business and residence districts. There is also a part time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are present in route to or from school, and when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.

1.2.3 Establishment of Speed Zones
The reason that speed limit zones and their required postings are established is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other similar laws, the limits identified are based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reasonable and safe. It is this type of information that is reflected in the analysis section of this report. Namely, posted speed limits are a reflection of that speed w hich most people deem to be safe as opposed to a minority of drivers who do not drive in a reasonable manner.

Speed zones are also established to advise drivers of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For that reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which considers the analytical data and accident history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 7

City of
2 SPEED SURVEY LOCATIONS
Speed evaluation data was collected on 152 different roadway segments along 41 different roadways in the City of Hemet . These roadways and their corresponding segments are shown on a map provided in Figure 2-1, and are listed in Table 2-1. Existing speed limit postings are shown in Figure 2-2.

As described in the CA MUTCD Section 2B.13, the individual locations on which radar data collection procedures were used involved considerations for the following:
a. Minimize the effect of a stop sign or traffic signal locations. b. Measure the unimpeded speed of free-flowing vehicles. c. Speed measurements should be taken during off -peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays.
d. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

21.B

NotT o Scale
Figure 2-1
Study Segment LocaƟons

City of Hemet, Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits LEGEND
Study Segment
City Limits
X
74 74
79 1
15 14
90 91
92 102
31 32
33 13 11
12 20 22 21 23
34 35
89 42
80 109
105
108
107
106
116
111
122
123
125
124
127
126
128
129
130
131
148 149
135
134
133
132
143
140
144 145
146
147
136
137 138 139
117
141 142
104
103
112
113
114
115
150
151
152
118
119
120
101
100 121
110
43 81 82 83 84 85
97 96
9493 95
86 87
44 4138 39
37 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 40
36 37
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 24 25
69 70 71
98 72
26 46
27 28 29
48 49
51 52
88 67
68 53
5450
30 2
19 45
57 58
99 56
55 3 4 5 6
7 8
16 17 18
9 10
47 FLORIDA AVE

ACACIA AVE CYPRESS ST

TRES CERRITOS AVE

DEVONSHIRE AVE

SEATTLE ST

DEVONSHIRE AVE

LATHAM AVELATHAM AVE

ACACIA AVE

CAWSTON AVE

CALIFORNIA AVE

FISHER ST

SANDERSON AVE SANDERSON AVE

WARREN RD

WARREN RD

OLD WARREN RD

KIRBY ST

MILLIE DR

KIRBY ST

LYON AVELYON AVE LYON AVE

PALM AVE

SEVEN HILLS
DR

PALM AVE

GILBERT ST GILBERT ST

BUENA VISTA STBUENA VISTA ST

THOMPSON ST

SANTA FE ST

YALE ST

MERIDIAN ST MERIDIAN ST

WASHINGTON AVE

RAMONA EXPY

HEMET ST HEMET ST

SOBOBA STSOBOBA ST

BERKLEY AVE

CHARLTON AVE

LINCOLN AVE

LAKE STLAKE ST

PARK AVE

PARK AVE

SAN JACINTO ST

GIRARD ST

COLUMBIA ST

CORNELL ST

DARTMOUTH ST

MENLO AVE MENLO AVE

OAKLAND AVE

FRUITVALE AVE

EATON AVE EATON AVE

ESPLANADE AVE

COMMONWEALTH AVE

STETSON AVE

ROCKING A RANCH RD

CHAMBERS ST

THORNTON AVE

STETSON AVE

POPLAR ST

JOHNSTON AVE

WHITTIER AVE

CENTRAL AVE

MUSTANG WY

NEWPORT RD

STATE ST

DOMENIGO
NI PKW
Y

SIMPSON RD DOMENIGONI PKWY

GILMORE ST
ELK ST

GARLAND WY

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 9

City of
Table 2-1 List of Study Segments

STUDY SEGMENT
Acacia Avenue
1 Florida to Sanderson
2 Sanderson to Kirby
3 Kirby to Lyon
4 Lyon to Gilbert
5 Gilbert to State
6 State to East City Limit
Buena Vista Avenue
7 North City Limits to Menlo
8 Menlo to Oakland
9 Florida to Stetson
10 Stetson to Chambers
California Avenue
11 Tres Cerritos to Devonshire
12 Devonshire to Florida
Cawston Avenue
13 Menlo to Devonshire
14 Devonshire to Florida
15 Stetson to Mustang
Columbia Street
16 Park to Devonshire
17 Devonshire to Florida
Cornell Street
18 Park to Florida
Cypress Street
19 Kirby to Wimbledon
Devonshire Avenue
20 California to Warren
21 Warren to Old Warren
22 Old Warren to Cawston
23 Cawston to Sanderson
24 Sanderson to Kirby
25 Kirby to Lyon
26 Lyon to State
27 State to Thompson
28 Santa Fe to San Jacinto
29 San Jacinto to Girard
30 Girard to Cornell

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 10

City of

STUDY SEGMENT
Domenigoni Parkway
31 Winchester to Warren
32 Warren to Sanderson
33 Sanderson to State
Eaton Avenue
34 Cawston to Sanderson
35 Sanderson to Kirby
36 Kirby to Lyon
37 Lyon to Palm
Esplanade Avenue
38 Sanderson to Kirby
39 Kirby to Lyon
40 Lyon to Palm
41 Palm to State
Fruitvale Avenue
42 Cawston to Sanderson
43 Sanderson to Kirby
44 Kirby to Lyon
Garland Way
45 Kirby to Johnston
Gilbert Street
46 Oakland to Florida
47 Johnston to Stetson
Girard Street
48 Menlo to Oakland
49 Oakland to Devonshire
50 Devonshire to Florida
Hemet Street
51 Washington to Wanda
52 Wanda to Charlton
53 Charlton to Lincoln
54 Lincoln to Florida
Johnston Ave
55 Sanderson to Kirby
56 Kirby to Lyon
57 Lyon to Palm
58 Palm to Gilbert

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 11

City of

STUDY SEGMENT
Kirby Street
59 Esplanade to Commonwealth
60 Commonwealth to Fruitvale
61 Fruitvale to Menlo
62 Menlo to Devonshire
63 Devonshire to Florida
64 Florida to Acacia
65 Acacia to Johnston
66 Johnston to Stetson
Lake Street
67 Ramona Expr. to Charlton
68 Charlton to Florida
Latham Avenue
69 Gilmore to Lyon
70 Lyon to Elk
71 Elk to Palm
72 Palm to State
Lyon Avenue
73 Esplanade to Menlo
74 Menlo to Devonshire
75 Devonshire to Latham
76 Latham to Florida
77 Florida to Acacia
78 Acacia to Johnston
79 Stetson to Chambers
Menlo Avenue
80 Cawston to Sanderson
81 Sanderson to Kirby
82 Kirby to Lyon
83 Lyon to Palm
84 Palm to State
85 State to Santa Fe
86 Santa Fe to San Jacinto
87 San Jacinto to Park
Meridian Street
88 Washington to Park
Millie Drive
89 Eaton to Fruitvale

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 12

City of

STUDY SEGMENT
Mustang Way
90 Warren to Fisher
91 Fisher to Cawston
92 Cawston to Sanderson
Oakland Avenue
93 Lyon to State
94 State to San Jacinto
95 San Jacinto to Park
Palm Avenue
96 Esplanade to Oakland
97 Oakland to Florida
98 Florida to Whittier
99 Whittier to Stetson
Park Avenue
100 North City Limit (W) to Dartmouth
101 Dartmouth to North City Limit (E)
Rexford Drive
102 Dusty Hill to Mustang
San Jacinto Street
103 Florida to Acacia
104 Acacia to Stetson
Sanderson Avenue
105 Esplanade to Menlo
106 Menlo to Devonshire
107 Devonshire to Florida
108 Florida to Acacia
109 Acacia to Stetson
110 Stetson to Mustang
111 Mustang to Domenigoni
Santa Fe Street
112 NCL to Oakland
113 Devonshire to Florida
114 Florida to Acacia
115 Acacia to Stetson
Seattle Street
116 Menlo to Cawston
Seven Hills Drive
117 Stetson to South End

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 13

City of

STUDY SEGMENT
Soboba Street
118 Mountain to Berkley
119 Berkley to Charlton
120 Charlton to Lincoln
121 Lincoln to Florida
State Street
122 Esplanade to Fruitvale
123 Fruitvale to Menlo
124 Menlo to Oakland
125 Oakland to Devonshire
126 Devonshire to Latham
127 Latham to Florida
128 Florida to Acacia
129 Acacia to Central
130 Central to Whittier
131 Whittier to Johnston
132 Johnston to Stetson
133 Stetson to Thornton
134 Thornton to Rocking A Ranch Rd
135 Rocking A Ranch Rd to Domenigoni
136 Domenigoni to Newport
Stetson Ave
137 Warren to Cawston
138 Cawston to Sanderson
139 Sanderson to Lyon
140 Lyon to Palm
141 Palm to State
142 State to San Jacinto
Thornton Avenue
143 Lyon to Palm
144 Palm to State
145 State to Santa Fe
Warren Road
146 Stetson to Mustang
147 Mustang to Simpson
Whittier Avenue
148 Lyon to Palm
149 Palm to Gilbert

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 14

City of

STUDY SEGMENT
Yale Street
150 Park to Oakland
151 Oakland to Devonshire
152 Devonshire to Florida

21.B

NotT o Scale
Figure 2-2
ExisƟng Speed Limit PosƟngs

City of Hemet, Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Speed Limit
25 MPH
30 MPH
35 MPH
40 MPH
45 MPH
50 MPH
55 MPH
65 MPH
LEGEND
Study Segment
City Limits
X
74 74
79 Not Posted
70 1
15 14
90 91
92 102
31 32
33 13 11
12 20 22 21 23
34 35
89 42
80 109
105
108
107
106
116
111
122
123
125
124
127
126
128
129
130
131
148 149
135
134
133
132
143
140
144 145
146
147
136
137 138 139
117
141 142
104
103
112
113
114
115
150
151
152
118
119
120
101
100 121
110
43 81 82 83 84 85
97 96
9493 95
86 87
44 4138 39
37 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 40
36 37
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 24 25
69 71
98 72
26 46
27 28 29
48 49
51 52
88 67
68 53
5450
30 2
19 45
57 58
99 56
55 3 4 5 6
7 8
16 17 18
9 10
47 FLORIDA AVE

ACACIA AVE CYPRESS ST

TRES CERRITOS AVE

DEVONSHIRE AVE

SEATTLE ST

DEVONSHIRE AVE

LATHAM AVELATHAM AVE

ACACIA AVE

CAWSTON AVE

CALIFORNIA AVE

FISHER ST

SANDERSON AVE SANDERSON AVE

WARREN RD

WARREN RD

OLD WARREN RD

KIRBY ST

MILLIE DR

KIRBY ST

LYON AVELYON AVE LYON AVE

PALM AVE

SEVEN HILLS
DR

PALM AVE

GILBERT ST GILBERT ST

BUENA VISTA STBUENA VISTA ST

THOMPSON ST

SANTA FE ST

YALE ST

MERIDIAN ST MERIDIAN ST

WASHINGTON AVE

RAMONA EXPY

HEMET ST HEMET ST

SOBOBA STSOBOBA ST

BERKLEY AVE

CHARLTON AVE

LINCOLN AVE

LAKE STLAKE ST

PARK AVE

PARK AVE

SAN JACINTO ST

GIRARD ST

COLUMBIA ST

CORNELL ST

DARTMOUTH ST

MENLO AVE MENLO AVE

OAKLAND AVE

FRUITVALE AVE

EATON AVE EATON AVE

ESPLANADE AVE

COMMONWEALTH AVE

STETSON AVE

ROCKING A RANCH RD

CHAMBERS ST

THORNTON AVE

STETSON AVE

POPLAR ST

JOHNSTON AVE

WHITTIER AVE

CENTRAL AVE

MUSTANG WY

NEWPORT RD

STATE ST

DOMENIGO
NI PKW
Y

SIMPSON RD DOMENIGONI PKWY

GILMORE ST
ELK ST

GARLAND WY

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 16

City of
3 METHODOLOGY FOR ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS
The CA MUTCD specifies a short method of determining speed limits on City and County Through Highways, Arterial and Collector Roads Procedures. This short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that the reasonable speed limit is one that conforms t o the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorist speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance.

B. The pace.

C. Roadside development and environment.

D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity.

E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period.

F. Speed zoning should be in 10 MPH increments.

G. Currently adopted speed limits.

3.1 Speed Survey Procedures
The following are guidelines for conducting a speed survey:
1) Only one person is required for the fieldwork. Speeds can be read directly from a radar gun or other speed measuring device.
2) A section of road should be selected with representative operating speeds. If speeds vary on a given road, additional surveys should be conducted. In this case, it may be necessary to establish additional speed zones with different speed limits.
3) Speed measurements should be taken during off -peak hours on weekdays. The weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is important that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous as not to affect traffic speeds. For this reaso n, an unmarked car is recommended, with the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed as to be able to survey traffic in both directions, and should not make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway centerline.
4) It is desirable to have a minimum sample of 100 automobiles in each survey, but in no case should the sample for any survey contain less than 50 automobiles. However, this may result in excessive survey periods for low-volume roads. Under these conditions, the survey should be conducted to obtain a bell-shaped representative sampling.
5) The CA MUTCD (Section 2B.13 Standard 12a) state s that when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile, rounding as standard mathematics directs. Under some circumstances the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph incr ement of the 85th percentile speed. If a 5 mph reduction is justified, the E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Tr affic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 22358.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 17

City of

3.2 Rounding Speed Limits in Relation to Free-Flowing Traffic (CVC 22358.6) The following standards are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria. Relevant sections of the CVC are shown in full in the appendices:
› When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free -flowing traffic (CVC Section 22358.6(a)) , except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)).

Option:

1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c).

3.3 Retaining or Restoring Speed Limit (CVC 22358.8)
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. Previous speed survey summary sheets, for segments where this justification has been applied, are provided in the appendices.

3.4 Business Activity District (CVC 22358.9)
AB 43 added section 22358.9 to the Vehicle Code, to read:
› (a)(1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.

(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 18

City of
› (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
(3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. › (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
› (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

3.5 Local Street Exemptions (CVC 40802)
Many streets are designated as "Local" streets per CVC 40802. These streets are exempt from the radar study. Therefore, the speed limit for these streets does not require an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The CVC states the following:

For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

A. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

B. Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.

C. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 19

City of

3.6 Other Considerations
Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices, sight distance, pedestrian and bicycle activity, roadway grades and alignment, and accident history. Any of these conditions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning.

3.7 Radar Collection Time Frame
The hours of the radar speed survey data collection were restricted to off -peak periods (when possible) for heavily traveled streets and to uncongested peak periods on lightly traveled streets. All surveys were conducted in fair weather.

The radar unit was mounted at the top of the front dash of an unmarked vehicle with the meter reading unit sustained inside the vehicle. The radar unit's calibration was checked periodically using a tuning fork.

The radar operator recorded the speed meter readings for each location on the radar speed survey data sheets included in Appendix A following this report. A representative sampling of at least 100 vehicles were surveyed for each study location. At locations with very light traffic flow, a minimum sample of 50 vehicles were surveyed.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 20

City of
4 ANALYSIS FACTORS

4.1 Speed Data
Several factors were used as input to our recommendations for speed limits. These include the 85th Percentile, the 10 MPH Pace and others. These are described in detail below. 1) The CRITICAL SPEED, or the 85th percentile is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. From experience, traffic engineers have found that this is one of the most reliable factors in determining appropriate speed limits. Hence, the accepted practice, and one that has been used in this case is to set the speed limit at or near the critical speed. This recognizes that other factors could be present where the above may not be appropriate. When this procedure is used, it not only conforms to that required by the State but it also provides a strong base for law enforcement personnel to properly enforce speed limits. 2) The 10 MPH PACE is that continuous 10 mph incremental range of speeds in which the largest number of recorded vehicles is contained. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. For this element, the accepted practice to the greatest extent possible, is to try and keep the recommended speed limit within the 10 mph pace after considering the critical speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the critical speed. 3) The MEDIAN (MIDDLE) SPEED , or 50th percentile speed, represents the mid- point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50% of the vehicles travel faster than, and 50% travel slower than the median speeds. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution. 4) The 15th PERCENTILE SPEED is that speed at or below which 15% of the vehicles are traveling.

This value is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the vehicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the ac cident potential.
5) MODAL SPEED: The modal speed is the speed, which occurs most frequently in the distribution (the most). It serves as another useful measure in verifying the correct recommendation for speed limits.
6) THE MEAN (AVERAGE) is the sum of the speeds of the samples divided by the number of samples. 7) STANDARD DEVIATION: This is a mathematical element, which relates to measures of dispersion of data. It is used to assist in describing the center of speed distribution information around the arithmetic mean or the time mean speed. It also is used in the overall review of r ecommended speed limits and serves to verify the level of confidence of data used in making recommendations.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 21

City of

4.2 Accident History
Accident information is used to support reducing speed limits below the 85th percentile. The accidents along with daily traffic volumes are used to calculate the crash rate. In order to apply this method, the segment accident rate shall be greater than the California Statewide Accident rate. Accident information was obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the most recent three - year period available, January 2018 to December 2020. The accident information was reviewed, and corresponding crash rates (number of reported crashes per million vehicle miles) were calculated and compared to the statewide averages. Twenty-four hour directional volume count (ADT) data was required to calculate segment accident rates. The raw ADT data and accident data are provided in Appendix A for each segment.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 22

City of
5 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following sections present the results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey for the 152 study locations. The Summary of Recommendations table in Section 5.3 shows the necessary analysis elements that, in addition to the field review of a registered Traffic Engineer, led to the recommendations indicated below. A summary of the study segments, characteristics , accident rate and i ndividual Study Segment Summary Sheets are provided in Appendix A.

5.1 Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes"
The survey concluded that 111 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes, as shown below in Table 5-1. The reason for maintaining the existing speed limit centers mostly on the fact that the newly measured values of the 85th percentile speeds are within the parameters to maintain the existing speed limits. Therefore, the current postings should remain as is.

Table 5-1 Locations Recommended for No Speed Limit Changes

STUDY SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
Acacia Avenue
5 Gilbert to State No change
6 State to East City Limit No change
Buena Vista Street
7 North City Limit to Menlo No change
8 Menlo to Oakland No change
9 Florida to Stetson No change
10 Stetson to Chambers No change
California Avenue
11 Tres Cerritos to Devonshire No change
12 Devonshire to Florida No change
Cawston Avenue
13 Menlo to Devonshire No change
14 Devonshire to Florida No change (Remain Not Posted) 15 Stetson to Mustang No change
Columbia Street
16 Park to Devonshire No change
Cornell Street
18 Park to Florida

No change
Cypress Street
19 Kirby to Wimbledon

No change

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 23

City of

STUDY SEGMENTS RECOMMENDATION
Devonshire Avenue
20 California to Warren No change
25 Kirby to Lyon No change
26 Lyon to State No change
27 State to Thompson No change
28 Santa Fe to San Jacinto No change
29 San Jacinto to Girard No change
Domenigoni Parkway
31 Winchester to Warren No change
32 Warren to Sanderson No change
33 Sanderson to State No change
Eaton Avenue
34 Cawston to Sanderson No change
35 Sanderson to Kirby No change
36 Kirby to Lyon No change
37 Lyon to Palm No change
Esplanade Avenue
38 Sanderson to Kirby No change
Fruitvale Avenue
42 Cawston to Sanderson No change
43 Sanderson to Kirby No change
44 Kirby to Lyon No change
Garland Way
45 Kirby to Johnston No change
Gilbert Street
47 Johnston to Stetson No change
Girard Street
49 Oakland to Devonshire No change
50 Devonshire to Florida No change
Hemet Street
51 Washington to Wanda No change
53 Charlton to Lincoln No change
54 Lincoln to Florida No change
Johnston Avenue
55 Sanderson to Kirby No change
56 Kirby to Lyon No change
57 Lyon to Palm No change

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 24

City of

STUDY SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
Kirby Street
59 Esplanade to Commonwealth No change
60 Commonwealth to Fruitvale No change
62 Menlo to Devonshire No change
63 Devonshire to Florida No change
66 Johnston to Stetson No change
Lake Street
67 Ramona Expr. to Charlton No change
68 Charlton to Florida No change
Latham Avenue
69 Gilmore to Lyon No change
70 Lyon to Elk No change
71 Elk to Palm No change
72 Palm to State No change
Lyon Avenue
73 Esplanade to Menlo No change
74 Menlo to Devonshire No change
76 Latham to Florida No change
79 Stetson to Chambers No change
Menlo Avenue
80 Cawston to Sanderson No change
84 Palm to State No change
85 State to Santa Fe No change
86 Santa Fe to San Jacinto No change
87 San Jacinto to Park No change
Meridian Street
88 Washington to Park No change
Millie Drive
89 Eaton to Fruitvale No change
Mustang Way
91 Fisher to Cawston No change
Oakland Avenue
92 Cawston to Sanderson No change
93 Lyon to State No change
94 State to San Jacinto No change
95 San Jacinto to Park No change

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 25

City of

STUDY SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
Palm Avenue
96 Esplanade to Oakland No change
98 Florida to Whittier No change
99 Whittier to Stetson No change
Park Avenue
100 North City Limit (W) to Dartmouth No change
101 Dartmouth to North City Limit (E) No change
Rexford Drive
102 Dusty Hill to Mustang No change
San Jacinto Street
103 Florida to Acacia No change
104 Acacia to Stetson No change
Sanderson Avenue
105 Esplanade to Menlo No change
106 Menlo to Devonshire No change
109 Acacia to Stetson No change
110 Stetson to Mustang No change
111 Mustang to Domenigoni No change
Santa Fe Street
112 NCL to Oakland No change
115 Acacia to Stetson No change
Seattle Street
116 Menlo to Cawston No change
Seven Hills Drive
117 Stetson to South End No change
Soboba Street
118 Mountain to Berkley No change
119 Berkley to Charlton No change/ Post at 40 MPH (NB) 120 Charlton to Lincoln No change
121 Lincoln to Florida No change

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 26

City of

STUDY SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
State Street
123 Fruitvale to Menlo No change
124 Menlo to Oakland No change
125 Oakland to Devonshire No change
126 Devonshire to Latham No change
128 Florida to Acacia No change
129 Acacia to Central No change
130 Central to Whittier No change
131 Whittier to Johnston No change
132 Johnston to Stetson No change
133 Stetson to Thornton No change
136 Domenigoni to Newport No change
Stetson Avenue
137 Warren to Cawston No change
138 Cawston to Sanderson No change
140 Lyon to Palm No change
142 State to San Jacinto No change
Thornton Avenue
144 Palm to State No change
Warren Road
146 Stetson to Mustang No change
Whittier Avenue
148 Lyon to Palm No change
149 Palm to Gilbert No change
Yale Street
150 Park to Oakland No change
151 Oakland to Devonshire No change
152 Devonshire to Florida No change

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 27

City of

5.2 Locations of Speed Limit Changes
With the combination of collected speed data, field review of existing roadway conditions, adjacent land uses and accident history the following recommended changes were made:
› Two segments, as shown in Table 5-2, are recommended for speed limit decreases. › Eight segments currently not posted are recommended to be posted at the speeds shown in Table 5-3.
› Thirty-one segments as shown in Table 5-4 are recommended for speed limit increases.

Supporting explanations of speed limit changes are provided in the Summary of Recommendations table in Section 5.3.

Table 5-2 Locations Recommended for Decreasing Speed Limit

STUDY SEGMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS
Lyon Avenue
75 Devonshire to Latham Reduce to 30 MPH
Stetson Avenue
141 Palm to State Reduce to 35 MPH
The table above shows that two segments are recommended for speed limit decreases.

Table 5-3 Location Currently Not Posted Recommended for Posting

STUDY SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
Columbia Street
17 Devonshire to Florida Post at 35 MPH
Gilbert Street
46 Oakland to Florida Post at 35 MPH
Girard Street
48 Menlo to Oakland Post at 35 MPH
Mustang Way
90 Warren to Fisher Post at 40 MPH
Palm Avenue
97 Oakland to Florida Post at 35 MPH
Santa Fe Street
113 Devonshire to Florida Post at 25 MPH
114 Florida to Acacia Post at 30 MPH
Warren Road
147 Mustang to Simpson Post at 50 MPH
The table above shows that 8 segments currently not posted, are recommended to be posted at the speeds shown.

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 28

City of
Table 5-4 Locations Recommended for Speed Limit Increases

STUDY SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
Acacia Avenue
1 Florida to Sanderson Increase to 50 MPH
2 Sanderson to Kirby Increase to 45 MPH
3 Kirby to Lyon Increase to 40 MPH
4 Lyon to Gilbert Increase to 35 MPH
Devonshire Avenue
21 Warren to Old Warren Increase to 45 MPH
22 Old Warren to Cawston Increase to 45 MPH
23 Cawston to Sanderson Increase to 45 MPH
24 Sanderson to Kirby Increase to 35 MPH
30 Girard to Cornell Increase to 45 MPH
Esplanade Avenue
39 Kirby to Lyon Increase to 45 MPH
40 Lyon to Palm Increase to 45 MPH
41 Palm to State Increase to 45 MPH
Hemet Street
52 Wanda to Charlton Increase to 40 MPH
Johnston Avenue
58 Palm to Gilbert Increase to 35 MPH
Kirby Street
61 Fruitvale to Menlo Increase to 40 MPH
64 Florida to Acacia Increase to 40 MPH
65 Acacia to Johnston Increase to 40 MPH
Lyon Avenue
77 Florida to Acacia Increase to 35 MPH
78 Acacia to Johnston Increase to 30 MPH
Menlo Avenue
81 Sanderson to Kirby Increase at 45 MPH
82 Kirby to Lyon Increase to 45 MPH
83 Lyon to Palm Increase to 45 MPH
Sanderson Avenue
107 Devonshire to Florida Increase to 35 MPH
108 Florida to Acacia Increase to 35 MPH
State Street
122 Esplanade to Fruitvale Increase to 50 MPH
127 Latham to Florida Increase to 30 MPH
134 Thornton to Rocking A Ranch Rd Increase to 40 MPH
135 Rocking A Ranch Rd to Domenigoni Increase to 55 MPH

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 29

City of

STUDY SEGMENT RECOMMENDATION
Stetson Avenue
139 Sanderson to Lyon Increase to 50 MPH
Thornton Avenue
143 Lyon to Palm Increase to 40 MPH
145 State to Santa Fe Increase to 35 MPH
The table above shows that thirty segments are recommended for speed limit increases.

Figure 5-1 shows study segment speed limit decreases, increases and no changes, as well as segments that are now being recommended for posting.

Recommended speed limits for each segment are shown in Figure 5-2.

21.B

NotT o Scale
Figure 5-1
Study Segment Speed Limit Changes

City of Hemet, Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

NO CHANGE

SPEED LIMIT INCREASED

SPEED LIMIT DECREASED
LEGEND
Study Segment
City Limits
X
74 74
79 RECOMMENDED FOR POSTING
70 1
15 14
90 91
92 102
31 32
33 13 11
12 20 22 21 23
34 35
89 42
80 109
105
108
107
106
116
111
122
123
125
124
127
126
128
129
130
131
148 149
135
134
133
132
143
140
144 145
146
147
136
137 138 139
117
141 142
104
103
112
113
114
115
150
151
152
118
119
120
101
100 121
110
43 81 82 83 84 85
97 96
9493 95
86 87
44 4138 39
37 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 40
36 37
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 24 25
69 71
98 72
26 46
27 28 29
48 49
51 52
88 67
68 53
5450
30 2
19 45
57 58
99 56
55 3 4 5 6
7 8
16 17 18
9 10
47 FLORIDA AVE

ACACIA AVE CYPRESS ST

TRES CERRITOS AVE

DEVONSHIRE AVE

SEATTLE ST

DEVONSHIRE AVE

LATHAM AVELATHAM AVE

ACACIA AVE

CAWSTON AVE

CALIFORNIA AVE

FISHER ST

SANDERSON AVE SANDERSON AVE

WARREN RD

WARREN RD

OLD WARREN RD

KIRBY ST

MILLIE DR

KIRBY ST

LYON AVELYON AVE LYON AVE

PALM AVE

SEVEN HILLS
DR

PALM AVE

GILBERT ST GILBERT ST

BUENA VISTA STBUENA VISTA ST

THOMPSON ST

SANTA FE ST

YALE ST

MERIDIAN ST MERIDIAN ST

WASHINGTON AVE

RAMONA EXPY

HEMET ST HEMET ST

SOBOBA STSOBOBA ST

BERKLEY AVE

CHARLTON AVE

LINCOLN AVE

LAKE STLAKE ST

PARK AVE

PARK AVE

SAN JACINTO ST

GIRARD ST

COLUMBIA ST

CORNELL ST

DARTMOUTH ST

MENLO AVE MENLO AVE

OAKLAND AVE

FRUITVALE AVE

EATON AVE EATON AVE

ESPLANADE AVE

COMMONWEALTH AVE

STETSON AVE

ROCKING A RANCH RD

CHAMBERS ST

THORNTON AVE

STETSON AVE

POPLAR ST

JOHNSTON AVE

WHITTIER AVE

CENTRAL AVE

MUSTANG WY

NEWPORT RD

STATE ST

DOMENIGO
NI PKW
Y

SIMPSON RD DOMENIGONI PKWY

GILMORE ST
ELK ST

GARLAND WY

21.B

NotT o Scale
Figure 5-2
Study Segment Recommended Speed Limits

City of Hemet, Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits Speed Limit
25 MPH
30 MPH
35 MPH
40 MPH
45 MPH
50 MPH
55 MPH
65 MPH
LEGEND
Study Segment
City Limits
X
74 74
79 Not Posted
70 1
15 14
90 91
92 102
31 32
33 13 11
12 20 22 21 23
34 35
89 42
80 109
105
108
107
106
116
111
122
123
125
124
127
126
128
129
130
131
148 149
135
134
133
132
143
140
144 145
146
147
136
137 138 139
117
141 142
104
103
112
113
114
115
150
151
152
118
119
120
101
100 121
110
43 81 82 83 84 85
97 96
9493 95
86 87
44 4138 39
37 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 40
36 37
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 24 25
69 71
98 72
26 46
27 28 29
48 49
51 52
88 67
68 53
5450
30 2
19 45
57 58
99 56
55 3 4 5 6
7 8
16 17 18
9 10
47 FLORIDA AVE

ACACIA AVE CYPRESS ST

TRES CERRITOS AVE

DEVONSHIRE AVE

SEATTLE ST

DEVONSHIRE AVE

LATHAM AVELATHAM AVE

ACACIA AVE

CAWSTON AVE

CALIFORNIA AVE

FISHER ST

SANDERSON AVE SANDERSON AVE

WARREN RD

WARREN RD

OLD WARREN RD

KIRBY ST

MILLIE DR

KIRBY ST

LYON AVELYON AVE LYON AVE

PALM AVE

SEVEN HILLS
DR

PALM AVE

GILBERT ST GILBERT ST

BUENA VISTA STBUENA VISTA ST

THOMPSON ST

SANTA FE ST

YALE ST

MERIDIAN ST MERIDIAN ST

WASHINGTON AVE

RAMONA EXPY

HEMET ST HEMET ST

SOBOBA STSOBOBA ST

BERKLEY AVE

CHARLTON AVE

LINCOLN AVE

LAKE STLAKE ST

PARK AVE

PARK AVE

SAN JACINTO ST

GIRARD ST

COLUMBIA ST

CORNELL ST

DARTMOUTH ST

MENLO AVE MENLO AVE

OAKLAND AVE

FRUITVALE AVE

EATON AVE EATON AVE

ESPLANADE AVE

COMMONWEALTH AVE

STETSON AVE

ROCKING A RANCH RD

CHAMBERS ST

THORNTON AVE

STETSON AVE

POPLAR ST

JOHNSTON AVE

WHITTIER AVE

CENTRAL AVE

MUSTANG WY

NEWPORT RD

STATE ST

DOMENIGO
NI PKW
Y

SIMPSON RD DOMENIGONI PKWY

GILMORE ST
ELK ST

GARLAND WY

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 32

City Of Hemet

5.3 Summary of Recommendations

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Acacia Avenue
1 Florida Sanderson 40 51 46 42-51 72% 50 Increase to 50 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 2 Sanderson Kirby 35 48 42 39-48 69% 45 Increase to 45 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 3 Kirby Lyon 35 40 36 31-40 80% 40 Increase to 40 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 4 Lyon Gilbert 30 40 35 30-39 72% 35 Increase to 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 5 Gilbert State 30 35 30 27-36 81% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 6 State East City Limit 30 34 30 25-34 83% 30 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 33

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Buena Vista Avenue
7 North City
Limit Menlo 35 40 35 29-38 78% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).
8 Menlo Oakland 30 40 35 31-40 75% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
9 Florida Stetson 35 40 34 31-40 69% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density). Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - church (CVC 627(c)( 2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B) and Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 10 Stetson Chambers 30 39 34 21-41 67% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

California Avenue
11 Tres Cerritos Devonshire 45 46 39 36-45 61% 45 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a). Consistent with speed limit set by County.
12 Devonshire Florida 45 52 46 43-52 72% 45 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 34

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Cawston Avenue
13 Menlo Devonshire 30 45 38 33-42 68% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
14 Devonshire Florida Not Posted 51 46 42-51 68% Remain Not posted No change
(Remain Not
Posted)
Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 15 Stetson Mustang 35 44 40 36-45 77% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Columbia Street
16 Park Devonshire 35 40 35 31-40 80% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 17 Devonshire Florida Not Posted 39 36 31-40 78% 35 Recommend 35 MPH
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Cornell Street
18 Park Florida 30 35 31 26-35 75% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups (CVC 627(c)(2).

Cypress Street
19 Kirby Wimbledon 30 36 28 24-33 62% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 35

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Devonshire Avenue
20 California Warren 45 50 46 42-51 69% 45 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been a dded to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
21 Warren Warren 35 48 43 38-47 73% 45 Increase to 45 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 22 Old Warren Cawston 40 52 47 42-51 69% 45 Increase to 45 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - no sidewalk (CVC 627(c)(2); 23 Cawston Sanderson 40 49 43 40-49 72% 45 Increase to 45 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 24 Sanderson Kirby 30 40 36 32-41 88% 35 Increase to 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).
25 Kirby Lyon 30 42 39 33-42 74% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
26 Lyon State 30 38 35 29-38 80% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
27 State Thompson 30 34 30 25-34 79% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 36

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Devonshire Avenue (Continued)
28 Santa Fe San Jacinto 30 31 27 22-31 81% 30 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 29 San Jacinto Girard 30 37 32 28-37 76% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Safety of bicyclists an d pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - Care Center (CVC 627(c)(2); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B) Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 30 Girard Cornell 30 39 34 31-40 78% 35 Increase to 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Domenigoni Parkway
31 Winchester Warren 65 72 68 64-73 78% 65 No change No person may drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour. CVC 22349(a). 32 Warren Sanderson 65 68 64 59-68 72% 65 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 33 Sanderson State 65 69 64 59-68 71% 65 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 37

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Eaton Avenue
34 Cawston Sanderson 40 48 42 35-44 61% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
35 Sanderson Kirby 40 47 42 37-46 68% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
36 Kirby Lyon 40 49 41 37-46 59% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
37 Lyon Palm 35 45 40 34-43 72% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Esplanade Avenue
38 Sanderson Kirby 45 47 42 36-45 75% 45 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 39 Kirby Lyon 40 47 43 38-47 77% 45 Increase to 45 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 40 Lyon Palm 40 49 43 39-48 70% 45 Increase to 45 MPH
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 41 Palm State 40 49 44 40-49 16% 45 Increase to 45 MPH
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 38

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Fruitvale Avenue
42 Cawston Sanderson 35 43 38 33-42 75% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
43 Sanderson Kirby 25 40 34 30-39 61% 25 No change Currently unenforceable at 25 MPH. 44 Kirby Lyon 35 42 36 33-42 62% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

Garland Way
45 Kirby Johnston 30 36 30 26-35 69% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

Gilbert Street
46 Oakland Florida Not Posted 39 31 27-36 55% 35 Post at 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 47 Johnston Stetson 30 38 33 28-37 74% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 39

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Girard Street
48 Menlo Oakland Not Posted 39 34 30-39 74% 35 Post at 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 49 Oakland Devonshire 30 39 33 28-37 71% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
50 Devonshire Florida 30 38 34 30-39 79% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Hemet Street
51 Washington Wanda 40 49 43 41-50 64% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
52 Wanda Charlton 35 40 36 30-39 82% 40 Increase to 40 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 53 Charlton Lincoln 35 40 35 32-41 75% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density) and CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average).
54 Lincoln Florida 30 39 35 30-39 72% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 40

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Johnston Avenue
55 Sanderson Kirby 30 35 31 27-36 88% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 56 Kirby Lyon 35 43 37 30-39 68% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
57 Lyon Palm 30 37 32 28-37 70% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density) and CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average).
58 Palm Gilbert 25 39 35 30-39 76% 35 Increase to 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 41

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Kirby Street
59 Esplanade Commonwealth 35 42 38 33-42 75% 35 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B (safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - no sidewalk westside). 60 Commonwea
lth Fruitvale 35 40 36 32-41 86% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B (safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - no sidewalk westside). 61 Fruitvale Menlo 35 44 40 35-44 79% 40 Increase to 40 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 62 Menlo Devonshire 45 49 43 37-46 59% 45 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 63 Devonshire Florida 35 37 34 29-38 93% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 64 Florida Acacia 35 41 36 32-41 81% 40 Increase to 40 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 65 Acacia Johnston 35 47 42 38-47 68% 40 Increase to 40 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B (safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - community park). 66 Johnston Stetson 35 42 37 33-42 81% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B (safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - community park).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 42

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Lake Street
67 Ramona
Expr. Charlton 35 42 37 32-41 67% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density) and CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average).
68 Charlton Florida 30 39 34 29-38 77% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Latham Avenue
69 Gilmore Lyon 35 40 34 30-39 71% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average). 70 Lyon Elk 35 43 37 33-42 69% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
71 Elk Palm 30 41 35 30-39 60% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
72 Palm State 30 37 33 28-37 71% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density) and CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 43

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Lyon Avenue
73 Esplanade Menlo 40 45 40 37-46 69% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
74 Menlo Devonshire 40 43 39 33-42 82% 40 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 75 Devonshire Latham 35 34 29 26-35 80% 30 Reduce to 30 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 76 Latham Florida 25 29 26 21-30 88% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 77 Florida Acacia 30 40 32 28-37 70% 35 Increase to 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 78 Acacia Johnston 30/25 41 35 30-39 68% 30 Post at 30 MPH Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
79 Stetson Chambers 40 45 40 35-44 71% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 44

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Menlo Avenue
80 Cawston Sanderson 40 46 40 35-44 69% 40 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density). Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - School (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B). 81 Sanderson Kirby 40 49 44 41-50 66% 45 Increase to 45 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 82 Kirby Lyon 40 46 41 36-45 77% 45 Increase to 45 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 83 Lyon Palm 40 46 41 38-47 76% 45 Increase to 45 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 84 Palm State 40 44 40 35-44 76% 40 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 85 State Santa Fe 35 36 32 27-36 75% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 86 Santa Fe San Jacinto 35 39 35 29-38 78% 35 No change When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 87 San Jacinto Park 35 42 37 34-43 72% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

Meridian Street
88 Washington Park 45 51 42 38-47 66% 45 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 45

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Millie Drive
89 Eaton Fruitvale 25 31 26 22-31 80% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

Mustang Way
90 Warren Fisher Not Posted 44 39 33-42 74% 40 Post at 40 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 91 Fisher Cawston 40 46 40 36-45 68% 40 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 92 Cawston Sanderson 35 45 39 34-43 71% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Oakland Avenue
93 Lyon State 30 43 36 30-39 63% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
94 State San Jacinto 30 37 32 28-37 77% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density) and CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average).
95 San Jacinto Park 35 37 34 28-37 79% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a)

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 46

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Palm Avenue
96 Esplanade Oakland 40 48 43 37-46 71% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
97 Oakland Florida Not Posted 37 32 28-37 79% 35 Post at 35 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 98 Florida Whittier 35 36 32 27-36 79% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 99 Whittier Stetson 30 38 33 29-38 70% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Park Avenue
100 North City
Limit (W) Dartmouth 40 47 42 38-47 67% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
101 Dartmouth North City Limits
(E) 40 43 39 34-43 78% 40 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Rexford Drive
102 Dusty Mustang 25 28 25 21-30 76% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 47

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
San Jacinto Street
103 Florida Acacia 30 37 33 29-38 73% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - School (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B) and CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average). 104 Acacia Stetson 30 41 36 32-41 76% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 48

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Sanderson Avenue
105 Esplanade Menlo 45 50 44 41-50 69% 45 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
106 Menlo Devonshire 45 50 45 40-49 77% 45 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
107 Devonshire Florida 30 37 31 26-35 75% 35 Increase to 35 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 108 Florida Acacia 30 36 30 27-36 69% 35 Increase to 35 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 109 Acacia Stetson 45 50 44 39-48 70% 45 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
110 Stetson Mustang 45 51 43 38-47 69% 45 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 111 Mustang Domenigoni 45 51 46 41-50 66% 45 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 49

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Santa Fe Street
112 NCL Oakland 35 36 31 27-36 71% 35 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 113 Devonshire Florida Not Posted 31 27 23-32 79% 25 Post at 25 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 114 Florida Acacia Not Posted 37 33 27-36 73% 30 Post at 30 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestrian groups - School (CVC 627(c)(2); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B) and CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E (Accident rate higher than statewide average). 115 Acacia Stetson 30 41 35 29-38 64% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Seattle Street
116 Menlo Cawston 30 37 32 28-37 76% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(A); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

Seven Hills Drive
117 Stetson South End 25 32 29 25-34 89% 25 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 50

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Soboba Street
118 Mountain Berkley 40 49 43 38-47 64% 40 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been a dded to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
119 Berkley Charlton Not Posted
(NB)/40 44 39 35-44 71% 40
Post at 40 MPH
(NB)/ No change
(SB)
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 120 Charlton Lincoln 35 41 38 34-43 86% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 121 Lincoln Florida 35 41 37 33-42 78% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 51

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
State Street
122 Esplanade Fruitvale 40 55 47 42-51 49% 50 Increase to 50 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 27K Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable).
123 Fruitvale Menlo 40 45 40 36-45 79% 40 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 124 Menlo Oakland 40 42 38 33-42 81% 40 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 125 Oakland Devonshire 40 41 37 32-41 79% 40 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 126 Devonshire Latham 30 35 29 23-32 73% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 127 Latham Florida 30 NB/
25 SB 34 27 22-31 75% 30 Post at 30 MPH in
both directions
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 128 Florida Acacia 30 35 31 27-36 81% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(B); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density). Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).
129 Acacia Central 30 35 31 27-36 73% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 130 Central Whittier 30 36 33 29-38 86% 30 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(A); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).
131 Whittier Johnston 35 39 33 28-37 75% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 52

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
State Street (Continued)
132 Johnston Stetson 35 38 33 28-37 76% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 133 Stetson Thornton 35 41 36 31-41 79% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 134 Thornton Rocking A Ranch
Rd
40 NB/45
SB 52 46 41-50 64% 45 Post at 45 MPH
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 27K Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable).
135 Rocking A
Ranch Rd Domenigoni 50 60 57 52-61 67% 55 Increase to 55 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 27K Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable).
136 Domenigoni Newport 55 59 52 46-55 66% 55 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 53

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Stetson Avenue
137 Warren Cawston 50 55 50 44-53 67% 50 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been a dded to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
138 Cawston Sanderson 50 49 45 40-49 69% 50 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 139 Sanderson Lyon 45 50 46 41-50 69% 50 Increase to 50 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 140 Lyon Palm 45 46 40 35-44 69% 45 No change Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 141 Palm State 40 41 36 31-40 71% 35 Reduce to 35 MPH
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E). 142 State San Jacinto 35 42 38 34-43 80% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

Thornton Avenue
143 Lyon Palm 35 42 36 31-40 75% 40 Increase to 40 MPH Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed of free - flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) 144 Palm State 35 39 33 30-39 75% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 145 State Santa Fe 30 39 33 30-39 75% 35 Increase to 35 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits 54

City Of Hemet

STREET LOCATION
POSTED
SPEED
LIMIT
(MPH)
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
(MPH)
MEDIAN
SPEED
(MPH)
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE

RECOMMENDED

SPEED LIMIT
(MPH)

RECOMMENDED

ACTION JUSTIFICATIONS
Warren Road
146 Stetson Mustang 45 49 44 39-48 74% 45 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 147 Mustang Simpson Not Posted 53 47 40-49 63% 50 Post at 50 MPH When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

Whittier Avenue
148 Lyon Palm 35 41 50 32-41 62% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(A); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).
149 Palm Gilbert 30 40 35 30-39 68% 30 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

Yale Street
150 Park Oakland 35 43 37 32-41 72% 35 No change
Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).
151 Oakland Devonshire 35 38 35 29-38 79% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2). 152 Devonshire Florida 35 38 34 29-38 79% 35 No change
When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A Data Package by Segment

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of
Appendix A Reference Table

STUDY SEGMENT APPENDIX

REFERENCE
Acacia Avenue
1 Florida to Sanderson A1
2 Sanderson to Kirby A2
3 Kirby to Lyon A3
4 Lyon to Gilbert A4
5 Gilbert to State A5
6 State to East City Limit A6
Buena Vista Avenue
7 North City Limits to Menlo A7
8 Menlo to Oakland A8
9 Florida to Stetson A9
10 Stetson to Chambers A10
California Avenue
11 Tres Cerritos to Devonshire A11
12 Devonshire to Florida A12
Cawston Avenue
13 Menlo to Devonshire A13
14 Devonshire to Florida A14
15 Stetson to Mustang A15
Columbia Street
16 Park to Devonshire A16
17 Devonshire to Florida A17
Cornell Street
18 Park to Florida A18
Cypress Street
19 Kirby to Wimbledon A19

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

STUDY SEGMENT APPENDIX

REFERENCE
Devonshire Avenue
20 California to Warren A20
21 Warren to Old Warren A21
22 Old Warren to Cawston A22
23 Cawston to Sanderson A23
24 Sanderson to Kirby A24
25 Kirby to Lyon A25
26 Lyon to State A26
27 State to Thompson A27
28 Santa Fe to San Jacinto A28
29 San Jacinto to Girard A29
30 Girard to Cornell A30
Domenigoni Parkway
31 Winchester to Warren A31
32 Warren to Sanderson A32
33 Sanderson to State A33
Eaton Avenue
34 Cawston to Sanderson A34
35 Sanderson to Kirby A35
36 Kirby to Lyon A36
37 Lyon to Palm A37
Esplanade Avenue
38 Sanderson to Kirby A38
39 Kirby to Lyon A39
40 Lyon to Palm A40
41 Palm to State A41
Fruitvale Avenue
42 Cawston to Sanderson A42
43 Sanderson to Kirby A43
44 Kirby to Lyon A44
Garland Way
45 Kirby to Johnston A45
Gilbert Street
46 Oakland to Florida A46
47 Johnston to Stetson A47

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

STUDY SEGMENT APPENDIX

REFERENCE
Girard Street
48 Menlo to Oakland A48
49 Oakland to Devonshire A49
50 Devonshire to Florida A50
Hemet Street
51 Washington to Wanda A51
52 Wanda to Charlton A52
53 Charlton to Lincoln A53
54 Lincoln to Florida A54
Johnston Ave
55 Sanderson to Kirby A55
56 Kirby to Lyon A56
57 Lyon to Palm A57
58 Palm to Gilbert A58
Kirby Street
59 Esplanade to Commonwealth A59
60 Commonwealth to Fruitvale A60
61 Fruitvale to Menlo A61
62 Menlo to Devonshire A62
63 Devonshire to Florida A63
64 Florida to Acacia A64
65 Acacia to Johnston A65
66 Johnston to Stetson A66
Lake Street
67 Ramona Expr. to Charlton A67
68 Charlton to Florida A68
Latham Avenue
69 Gilmore to Lyon A69
70 Lyon to Elk A70
71 Elk to Palm A71
72 Palm to State A72

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

STUDY SEGMENT APPENDIX

REFERENCE
Lyon Avenue
73 Esplanade to Menlo A73
74 Menlo to Devonshire A74
75 Devonshire to Latham A75
76 Latham to Florida A76
77 Florida to Acacia A77
78 Acacia to Johnston A78
79 Stetson to Chambers A79
Menlo Avenue
80 Cawston to Sanderson A80
81 Sanderson to Kirby A81
82 Kirby to Lyon A82
83 Lyon to Palm A83
84 Palm to State A84
85 State to Santa Fe A85
86 Santa Fe to San Jacinto A86
87 San Jacinto to Park A87
Meridian Street
88 Washington to Park A88
Millie Drive
89 Eaton to Fruitvale A89
Mustang Way
90 Warren to Fisher A90
91 Fisher to Cawston A91
92 Cawston to Sanderson A92
Oakland Avenue
93 Lyon to State A93
94 State to San Jacinto A94
95 San Jacinto to Park A95
Palm Avenue
96 Esplanade to Oakland A96
97 Oakland to Florida A97
98 Florida to Whittier A98
99 Whittier to Stetson A99
Park Avenue
100 North City Limit (W) to Dartmouth A100
101 Dartmouth to North City Limit (E) A101

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

STUDY SEGMENT APPENDIX

REFERENCE
Rexford Drive
102 Dusty Hill to Mustang A102
San Jacinto Street
103 Florida to Acacia A103
104 Acacia to Stetson A104
Sanderson Avenue
105 Esplanade to Menlo A105
106 Menlo to Devonshire A106
107 Devonshire to Florida A107
108 Florida to Acacia A108
109 Acacia to Stetson A109
110 Stetson to Mustang A110
111 Mustang to Domenigoni A111
Santa Fe Street
112 NCL to Oakland A112
113 Devonshire to Florida A113
114 Florida to Acacia A114
115 Acacia to Stetson A115
Seattle Street
116 Menlo to Cawston A116
Seven Hills Drive
117 Stetson to South End A117
Soboba Street
118 Mountain to Berkley A118
119 Berkley to Charlton A119
120 Charlton to Lincoln A120
121 Lincoln to Florida A121

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

STUDY SEGMENT APPENDIX

REFERENCE
State Street
122 Esplanade to Fruitvale A122
123 Fruitvale to Menlo A123
124 Menlo to Oakland A124
125 Oakland to Devonshire A125
126 Devonshire to Latham A126
127 Latham to Florida A127
128 Florida to Acacia A128
129 Acacia to Central A129
130 Central to Whittier A130
131 Whittier to Johnston A131
132 Johnston to Stetson A132
133 Stetson to Thornton A133
134 Thornton to Rocking A Ranch Rd A134
135 Rocking A Ranch Rd to Domenigoni A135
136 Domenigoni to Newport A136
Stetson Ave
137 Warren to Cawston A137
138 Cawston to Sanderson A138
139 Sanderson to Lyon A139
140 Lyon to Palm A140
141 Palm to State A141
142 State to San Jacinto A142
Thornton Avenue
143 Lyon to Palm A143
144 Palm to State A144
145 State to Santa Fe A145
Warren Road
146 Stetson to Mustang A146
147 Mustang to Simpson A147
Whittier Avenue
148 Lyon to Palm A148
149 Palm to Gilbert A149
Yale Street
150 Park to Oakland A150
151 Oakland to Devonshire A151
152 Devonshire to Florida A152

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A1
Acacia Avenue between Florida and Sanderson

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

1 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Acacia Ave
From: Florida Ave To: Sanderson Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 51 MPH
50 Percentile 46 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH
10 MPH Pace 42-51 MPH
Percent in Pace 72%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.65 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 7,620
Total Accidents: 2
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 0.37
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 50 MPH

This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds , it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 50 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:
☐ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☒ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Acacia Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Florida Avenue - Sanderson Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 3 0 54 X X X 3 Time
53 3 0 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 5 2 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 3 1 50 X X X X 4 * To: 9:20
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing
47 3 4 47 X X X X X X X 7 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 6 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
45 1 8 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 18% 12% 10%
39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5
38 3 0 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 66% 84% 72%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 18%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 45 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51MPH 39 - 48MPH 42 - 51MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:41 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:46 MPH 45 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:53 MPH 48 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Acacia Avenue
B/ Florida Avenue - Sanderson Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM001
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 10 67 4 77
12:15 11 72 5 49
12:30 6 71 4 53
12:45 4 62 31 272 7 74 20 253 51 525
01:00 5 63 5 60
01:15 9 71 3 80
01:30 5 83 3 58
01:45 5 71 24 288 1 63 12 261 36 549
02:00 4 74 1 61
02:15 8 84 2 49
02:30 6 83 7 72
02:45 4 78 22 319 4 62 14 244 36 563
03:00 5 73 2 75
03:15 5 83 7 63
03:30 2 93 20 73
03:45 8 91 20 340 8 76 37 287 57 627
04:00 9 100 17 78
04:15 9 88 27 86
04:30 4 87 31 63
04:45 6 102 28 377 16 53 91 280 119 657
05:00 9 98 28 60
05:15 17 88 31 69
05:30 18 92 31 61
05:45 25 68 69 346 37 58 127 248 196 594
06:00 20 69 32 61
06:15 28 85 35 40
06:30 17 73 49 43
06:45 33 66 98 293 36 29 152 173 250 466
07:00 53 38 50 34
07:15 52 46 53 29
07:30 50 48 52 35
07:45 63 29 218 161 42 25 197 123 415 284
08:00 52 19 32 23
08:15 58 9 40 21
08:30 51 8 48 22
08:45 78 10 239 46 65 20 185 86 424 132
09:00 67 19 53 34
09:15 30 15 43 21
09:30 48 27 39 17
09:45 66 25 211 86 47 6 182 78 393 164
10:00 49 17 48 26
10:15 53 18 45 8
10:30 63 21 50 9
10:45 61 8 226 64 48 10 191 53 417 117
11:00 60 16 46 9
11:15 69 16 56 9
11:30 63 18 39 9
11:45 62 15 254 65 57 4 198 31 452 96
Total 1440 2657 1440 2657 1406 2117 1406 2117 2846 4774 Combined
Total 4097 4097 3523 3523 7620
AM Peak - 08:15 - - - 08:30 - - - - -
Vol. - 254 - - - 209 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.814 0.804
PM Peak - - 04:45 - - - 03:30 - - - -
Vol. - - 380 - - - 313 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.931 0.910

Percentag
e 35.1% 64.9% 39.9% 60.1%
ADT/AADT ADT 7,620 AADT 7,620

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
City of Imperial Beach City of City of
Appendix A2
Acacia Avenue between Sanderson and Kirby

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

2 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Acacia Ave
From: Sanderson Ave To: Kirby St

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 48 MPH
50th Percentile 42 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
10 MPH Pace 39-48 MPH
Percent in Pace 69%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.51 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 12,908
Total Accidents: 8
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.11
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA- MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 45 MPH

This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds , it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 45 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:
☐ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☒ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Acacia Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sanderson Avenue - Kirby Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:20
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 0 2 50 X X 2 To: 9:40
49 4 1 49 X X X X X 5
48 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 1 1 46 X X 2 *
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 5 4 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
42 3 6 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 5 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%
39 2 6 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 70% 74% 69%
37 1 1 37 X X 2
36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 22%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 3 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 33 2 0 33 X X 2
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 40 - 49MPH 38 - 47MPH 39 - 48MPH 31 1 0 31 X 1
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:36 MPH 38 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:43 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Acacia Avenue
B/ Sanderson Avenue - Kirby Street
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM002
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 16 108 5 145
12:15 14 111 7 140
12:30 8 104 6 116
12:45 12 95 50 418 12 136 30 537 80 955
01:00 14 115 9 125
01:15 8 103 7 119
01:30 7 113 6 121
01:45 7 134 36 465 5 121 27 486 63 951
02:00 7 118 3 112
02:15 13 133 7 141
02:30 8 120 5 152
02:45 3 110 31 481 6 145 21 550 52 1031
03:00 12 132 5 119
03:15 3 109 11 123
03:30 5 140 24 132
03:45 11 142 31 523 16 117 56 491 87 1014
04:00 7 130 26 157
04:15 4 123 39 143
04:30 8 118 34 117
04:45 6 140 25 511 41 110 140 527 165 1038
05:00 12 130 40 129
05:15 34 122 58 133
05:30 18 110 58 116
05:45 32 107 96 469 66 96 222 474 318 943
06:00 18 94 62 121
06:15 30 107 51 94
06:30 31 106 54 94
06:45 40 96 119 403 69 72 236 381 355 784
07:00 53 67 74 71
07:15 65 98 70 48
07:30 73 81 77 56
07:45 84 49 275 295 82 51 303 226 578 521
08:00 44 65 79 60
08:15 77 50 96 59
08:30 91 61 87 44
08:45 75 41 287 217 113 38 375 201 662 418
09:00 87 46 98 53
09:15 56 28 76 29
09:30 69 34 78 26
09:45 73 35 285 143 101 23 353 131 638 274
10:00 59 30 106 25
10:15 76 46 98 17
10:30 85 31 117 15
10:45 106 33 326 140 114 20 435 77 761 217
11:00 92 21 101 20
11:15 93 29 106 22
11:30 103 21 111 14
11:45 105 22 393 93 133 10 451 66 844 159
Total 1954 4158 1954 4158 2649 4147 2649 4147 4603 8305 Combined
Total 6112 6112 6796 6796 12908
AM Peak - 10:45 - - - 11:00 - - - - -
Vol. - 394 - - - 451 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.929 0.848
PM Peak - - 03:30 - - - 02:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 535 - - - 557 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.942 0.916

Percentag
e 32.0% 68.0% 39.0% 61.0%
ADT/AADT ADT 12,908 AADT 12,908

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A3
Acacia Avenue between Kirby and Lyon

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

3 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Acacia Ave
From: Kirby St To: Lyon Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 40 MPH
50 Percentile 36 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
10 MPH Pace 31-40 MPH
Percent in Pace 80%

Street Classification: Express Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.50 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 12,129
Total Accidents: 5
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 0.75
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a) TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 40 MPH

This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds , it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 40 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☐ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☒ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE
: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Acacia Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Kirby Street - Lyon Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 10:50
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 0 1 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 1 44 X 1
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 5 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%
39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 6 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * % In Pace: 84% 78% 80% 37 4 3 37 X X X X X X X 7 P
36 11 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A % Under Pace: 4% 8% 7% 35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 C
34 6 4 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E Average Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH 33 5 2 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4 * Pace Speed: 30 - 39MPH 31 - 40MPH 31 - 40MPH 31 4 3 31 X X X X X X X 7 *
30 1 2 30 X X X 3
29 1 1 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 28 1 1 28 X X 2
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:36 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:38 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Acacia Avenue
B/ Kirby Street - Lyon Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM003
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 8 106 10 140
12:15 10 95 4 144
12:30 5 106 5 119
12:45 7 88 30 395 7 121 26 524 56 919
01:00 12 114 4 124
01:15 3 116 2 104
01:30 3 109 7 113
01:45 6 127 24 466 1 101 14 442 38 908
02:00 5 126 3 123
02:15 10 117 6 142
02:30 11 132 3 149
02:45 5 99 31 474 3 116 15 530 46 1004
03:00 7 122 3 141
03:15 4 102 9 117
03:30 5 134 15 124
03:45 10 119 26 477 17 108 44 490 70 967
04:00 4 106 18 160
04:15 6 133 28 127
04:30 5 110 24 120
04:45 11 143 26 492 34 105 104 512 130 1004
05:00 6 102 25 132
05:15 29 102 42 105
05:30 20 101 40 95
05:45 30 105 85 410 58 88 165 420 250 830
06:00 29 83 41 113
06:15 33 83 43 84
06:30 31 86 42 85
06:45 36 85 129 337 58 73 184 355 313 692
07:00 65 70 61 59
07:15 82 80 63 59
07:30 90 67 83 57
07:45 90 63 327 280 77 46 284 221 611 501
08:00 61 61 82 52
08:15 75 42 76 48
08:30 99 56 76 41
08:45 78 44 313 203 95 47 329 188 642 391
09:00 61 57 90 35
09:15 60 35 91 28
09:30 71 43 76 20
09:45 76 28 268 163 88 28 345 111 613 274
10:00 62 38 104 21
10:15 81 38 80 21
10:30 79 27 101 17
10:45 104 23 326 126 110 15 395 74 721 200
11:00 103 17 98 11
11:15 86 19 117 13
11:30 101 15 121 14
11:45 102 18 392 69 107 7 443 45 835 114
Total 1977 3892 1977 3892 2348 3912 2348 3912 4325 7804 Combined
Total 5869 5869 6260 6260 12129
AM Peak - 10:45 - - - 10:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 394 - - - 446 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.947 0.921
PM Peak - - 01:45 - - - 02:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 502 - - - 548 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.951 0.919

Percentag
e 33.7% 66.3% 37.5% 62.5%
ADT/AADT ADT 12,129 AADT 12,129

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A4
Acacia Avenue between Lyon and Gilbert

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

4 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Acacia Ave
From: Lyon Ave To: Gilbert St

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 40 MPH
50 Percentile 35 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace 30-39 MPH
Percent in Pace 72%

Street Classification: Express Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.75 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 9,317
Total Accidents: 11
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.44
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds and conditions not readily apparent, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 35 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☐ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☒ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Acacia Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Lyon Avenue - Gilbert Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 1 47 X 1 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 2 45 X X 2
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 From: 10:50
42 0 3 42 X X X 3
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 0 2 40 X X 2 To: 11:10
39 4 1 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 2 4 38 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
37 2 7 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 7 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
35 8 2 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
34 8 3 34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5 E
32 3 2 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 5 2 31 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 1 30 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 8% 16%
29 0 2 29 X X 2
28 2 3 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 82% 64% 72%
27 1 1 27 X X 2
26 1 1 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 10% 28% 12%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 30 - 39MPH 34 - 43MPH 30 - 39MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:31 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:34 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:39 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Acacia Avenue
B/ Lyon Avenue - Gilbert Street
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM004
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 7 91 4 107
12:15 6 82 3 82
12:30 5 82 5 85
12:45 7 83 25 338 3 95 15 369 40 707
01:00 9 72 4 84
01:15 1 81 1 94
01:30 3 86 4 79
01:45 3 99 16 338 2 78 11 335 27 673
02:00 3 122 3 82
02:15 7 98 1 129
02:30 4 98 3 116
02:45 3 92 17 410 0 104 7 431 24 841
03:00 6 77 4 102
03:15 1 75 5 101
03:30 3 90 10 91
03:45 2 105 12 347 13 80 32 374 44 721
04:00 2 97 9 122
04:15 7 94 13 98
04:30 2 94 19 91
04:45 7 105 18 390 23 90 64 401 82 791
05:00 6 94 16 83
05:15 14 84 28 88
05:30 11 91 20 68
05:45 19 85 50 354 28 70 92 309 142 663
06:00 19 63 13 83
06:15 22 65 30 73
06:30 16 88 20 67
06:45 30 80 87 296 39 59 102 282 189 578
07:00 56 52 42 39
07:15 58 65 63 48
07:30 57 58 87 39
07:45 52 53 223 228 77 30 269 156 492 384
08:00 41 45 59 41
08:15 53 31 73 36
08:30 69 39 61 28
08:45 67 40 230 155 87 25 280 130 510 285
09:00 45 52 63 23
09:15 38 31 84 24
09:30 60 35 55 15
09:45 62 19 205 137 84 21 286 83 491 220
10:00 54 25 72 11
10:15 63 13 63 11
10:30 74 15 79 14
10:45 92 13 283 66 63 15 277 51 560 117
11:00 71 10 88 9
11:15 76 16 106 11
11:30 88 9 68 8
11:45 79 10 314 45 81 6 343 34 657 79
Total 1480 3104 1480 3104 1778 2955 1778 2955 3258 6059 Combined
Total 4584 4584 4733 4733 9317
AM Peak - 10:45 - - - 11:00 - - - - -
Vol. - 327 - - - 343 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.889 0.809
PM Peak - - 01:45 - - - 02:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 417 - - - 451 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.855 0.874

Percentag
e 32.3% 67.7% 37.6% 62.4%
ADT/AADT ADT 9,317 AADT 9,317

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A5
Acacia Avenue between Gilbert and State

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

5 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Acacia Ave
From: Gilbert St To: State St

Date of Speed Survey: 6/14/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 35 MPH
50 Percentile 30 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace 27-36 MPH
Percent in Pace 81%

Street Classification: Express Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.25 Miles
Average Daily Traffic: 6,216
Total Accidents: 4
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 2.35
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 30 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds and conditions not readily apparent, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 30 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE
: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Acacia Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Gilbert Street - State Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 10:15
42 0 0 42 0
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:40
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 1 38 X 1 Existing
37 0 3 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 1 2 36 X X X 3 *
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 *
33 2 5 33 X X X X X X X 7 P
32 7 4 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
31 2 2 31 X X X X 4 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 6 10 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E % Over Pace: 6% 16% 10% 29 5 6 29 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
28 8 3 28 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 84% 80% 81% 27 6 4 27 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
26 2 1 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 10% 4% 9%
25 1 1 25 X X 2
24 2 0 24 X X 2 Average Speed: 30 MPH 32 MPH 31 MPH
23 1 0 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 26 - 35MPH 27 - 36MPH 27 - 36MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 1 0 20 X 1
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:27 MPH 28 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:29 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:33 MPH 37 MPH 35 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/14/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Acacia Avenue
B/ Gilbert Street - State Street
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM005
Site Code: 232-23157B

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 6/8/23 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 57 6 67
12:15 3 47 5 61
12:30 2 66 2 57
12:45 3 63 12 233 2 47 15 232 27 465
01:00 1 52 1 59
01:15 1 58 5 50
01:30 2 56 0 57
01:45 2 73 6 239 2 50 8 216 14 455
02:00 0 67 3 51
02:15 2 62 2 49
02:30 1 79 1 49
02:45 1 58 4 266 1 64 7 213 11 479
03:00 2 68 3 60
03:15 4 80 4 41
03:30 2 83 3 73
03:45 0 78 8 309 2 50 12 224 20 533
04:00 3 74 3 56
04:15 0 66 6 49
04:30 2 89 6 63
04:45 5 71 10 300 13 63 28 231 38 531
05:00 2 75 13 61
05:15 9 68 11 45
05:30 6 57 23 68
05:45 9 73 26 273 20 28 67 202 93 475
06:00 11 60 11 50
06:15 13 64 35 37
06:30 23 47 24 36
06:45 14 61 61 232 21 33 91 156 152 388
07:00 23 24 36 52
07:15 28 68 31 35
07:30 23 25 39 38
07:45 28 41 102 158 26 31 132 156 234 314
08:00 26 26 39 34
08:15 26 48 47 27
08:30 37 36 34 29
08:45 42 34 131 144 46 22 166 112 297 256
09:00 28 33 38 26
09:15 40 32 25 12
09:30 39 28 45 18
09:45 42 21 149 114 37 11 145 67 294 181
10:00 43 22 44 11
10:15 53 18 51 7
10:30 50 18 42 6
10:45 41 9 187 67 51 7 188 31 375 98
11:00 54 8 54 7
11:15 67 15 49 6
11:30 39 6 60 4
11:45 52 7 212 36 53 5 216 22 428 58
Total 908 2371 908 2371 1075 1862 1075 1862 1983 4233
Combined
Total 3279 3279 2937 2937 6216
AM Peak - 10:30 - - - 11:00 - - - - -
Vol. - 212 - - - 216 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.791 0.900
PM Peak - - 03:15 - - - 02:45 - - - -
Vol. - - 315 - - - 238 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.949 0.815

Percentag
e 27.7% 72.3% 36.6% 63.4%
ADT/AADT ADT 6,216 AADT 6,216

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A6
Acacia Avenue between State and East City Limit

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

6 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Acacia Ave
From: State St To: East City Limit

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 34 MPH
50 Percentile 30 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace 25-34 MPH
Percent in Pace 83%

Street Classification: Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.81 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 6,108
Total Accidents: 12
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 2.22
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA - MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 30 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speed, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 30 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code
☐ Establishment of new speed zone
APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Acacia Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: State Street - East City Limit
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 11:10
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 11:30
39 0 2 39 X X 2
38 0 1 38 X 1 Existing
37 1 0 37 X 1 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 0 3 36 X X X 3
35 1 2 35 X X X 3
34 2 4 34 X X X X X X 6 *
33 2 6 33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 6 5 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
31 8 5 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 4 7 30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A % Over Pace: 8% 6% 10% 29 9 3 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
28 2 4 28 X X X X X X 6 E % In Pace: 90% 84% 83%
27 3 3 27 X X X X X X 6 *
26 3 2 26 X X X X X 5 * % Under Pace: 2% 10% 7%
25 4 1 25 X X X X X 5 *
24 4 1 24 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 29 MPH 31 MPH 30 MPH 23 0 1 23 X 1
22 1 0 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 24 - 33MPH 27 - 36MPH 25 - 34MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:25 MPH 27 MPH 26 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:29 MPH 31 MPH 30 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:32 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Acacia Avenue
B/ State Street - East City Limits
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM006
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 5 46 2 60
12:15 3 39 3 42
12:30 4 34 2 57
12:45 2 48 14 167 3 54 10 213 24 380
01:00 3 41 2 59
01:15 2 73 3 53
01:30 0 68 0 53
01:45 1 63 6 245 1 56 6 221 12 466
02:00 6 56 1 62
02:15 1 56 3 71
02:30 3 70 2 71
02:45 1 69 11 251 1 46 7 250 18 501
03:00 2 60 2 54
03:15 2 58 4 64
03:30 3 70 9 53
03:45 1 52 8 240 5 67 20 238 28 478
04:00 0 57 6 81
04:15 2 66 4 56
04:30 1 64 11 59
04:45 3 88 6 275 5 53 26 249 32 524
05:00 2 86 11 71
05:15 6 66 14 50
05:30 7 62 16 48
05:45 10 63 25 277 16 35 57 204 82 481
06:00 6 51 16 50
06:15 13 48 18 45
06:30 19 57 24 35
06:45 24 50 62 206 36 42 94 172 156 378
07:00 39 36 39 27
07:15 53 41 68 35
07:30 38 47 60 25
07:45 39 23 169 147 78 27 245 114 414 261
08:00 33 41 50 24
08:15 34 21 47 18
08:30 43 26 60 13
08:45 41 27 151 115 74 7 231 62 382 177
09:00 30 19 46 13
09:15 29 16 49 15
09:30 36 21 40 13
09:45 25 9 120 65 60 13 195 54 315 119
10:00 39 17 46 11
10:15 40 14 47 11
10:30 52 12 47 6
10:45 47 8 178 51 47 9 187 37 365 88
11:00 47 5 59 8
11:15 34 4 53 7
11:30 38 7 53 5
11:45 52 4 171 20 50 1 215 21 386 41
Total 921 2059 921 2059 1293 1835 1293 1835 2214 3894
Combined
Total 2980 2980 3128 3128 6108
AM Peak - 10:15 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 186 - - - 256 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.894 0.821
PM Peak - - 04:15 - - - 03:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 304 - - - 265 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.864 0.818

Percentag
e 30.9% 69.1% 41.3% 58.7%
ADT/AADT ADT 6,108 AADT 6,108

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
City of Imperial Beach City of City of
Appendix A7
Buena Vista Avenue between North City Limits and Menlo

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

7 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Buena Vista St
From: North City Limit To: Menlo Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/2/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 40 MPH
50 Percentile 35 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
10 MPH Pace 29-38 MPH
Percent in Pace 78%

Street Classification: Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.74 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 2,200
Total Accidents: 2
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.12
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 3 5 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds and conditions not readily apparent, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 35 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Buena Vista Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: North City Limit - Menlo Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 0 2 43 X X 2 From: 12:55
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 2 1 40 X X X 3 To: 1:15
39 0 2 39 X X 2
38 7 1 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
37 5 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Speed Limit: 30 MPH 36 3 8 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
35 7 4 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
34 7 6 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A
33 1 4 33 X X X X X 5 C
32 6 1 32 X X X X X X X 7 E
31 2 3 31 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 2 1 30 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 19%
29 1 3 29 X X X X 4 *
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 82% 78% 78%
27 0 0 27 0
26 1 1 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 18% 3%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38MPH 33 - 42MPH 29 - 38MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:32 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:38 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/2/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Buena Vista Street
B/ North City Limits - Menlo Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM007
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/28/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 5 15 4 13
12:15 5 17 3 14
12:30 1 12 1 9
12:45 2 15 13 59 1 20 9 56 22 115
01:00 0 7 1 24
01:15 1 19 1 14
01:30 1 18 4 10
01:45 2 17 4 61 0 20 6 68 10 129
02:00 4 15 0 21
02:15 1 14 0 14
02:30 2 22 2 21
02:45 0 9 7 60 1 17 3 73 10 133
03:00 2 20 1 18
03:15 1 15 1 18
03:30 2 20 2 18
03:45 1 21 6 76 7 21 11 75 17 151
04:00 1 24 3 30
04:15 1 17 7 17
04:30 1 30 1 16
04:45 5 20 8 91 4 21 15 84 23 175
05:00 3 28 12 20
05:15 1 26 10 18
05:30 1 16 3 17
05:45 1 22 6 92 5 36 30 91 36 183
06:00 13 27 13 15
06:15 4 22 12 20
06:30 6 27 13 16
06:45 8 18 31 94 18 15 56 66 87 160
07:00 9 19 11 22
07:15 9 38 26 11
07:30 19 22 27 23
07:45 16 8 53 87 23 23 87 79 140 166
08:00 13 8 14 3
08:15 14 22 14 9
08:30 14 16 23 15
08:45 8 8 49 54 11 6 62 33 111 87
09:00 13 12 12 15
09:15 12 12 16 35
09:30 18 11 15 5
09:45 9 3 52 38 7 5 50 60 102 98
10:00 10 2 25 1
10:15 7 6 10 8
10:30 8 9 9 4
10:45 13 5 38 22 13 3 57 16 95 38
11:00 9 6 10 4
11:15 7 7 9 6
11:30 16 1 11 1
11:45 9 6 41 20 10 0 40 11 81 31
Total 308 754 308 754 426 712 426 712 734 1466
Combined
Total 1062 1062 1138 1138 2200
AM Peak - 07:30 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 62 - - - 90 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.816 0.833
PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 05:00 - - - -
Vol. - - 104 - - - 91 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.867 0.632

Percentag
e 29.0% 71.0% 37.4% 62.6%
ADT/AADT ADT 2,200 AADT 2,200

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A8
Buena Vista Avenue between Menlo and Oakland

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

8 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Buena Vista St
From: Menlo Ave To: Oakland Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/2/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 40 MPH
50 Percentile 35 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace 31-40 MPH
Percent in Pace 75%

Street Classification: Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.25 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 3,654
Total Accidents: 2
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 2.00
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 3 0 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the existing posted speed, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 30 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Buena Vista Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Menlo Avenue - Oakland Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 0 3 44 X X X 3 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 1:15
42 2 1 42 X X X 3
41 0 1 41 X 1 Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 1:35
39 4 4 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 2 4 38 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
37 5 4 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 3 5 36 X X X X X X X X 8 A
35 4 3 35 X X X X X X X 7 C
34 5 3 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 4 2 33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 4 7 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
31 3 3 31 X X X X X X 6 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%
29 4 1 29 X X X X X 5
28 1 2 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 72% 78% 75%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40MPH 31 - 40MPH 31 - 40MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:30 MPH 32 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/2/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Buena Vista Street
B/ Menlo Avenue - Oakland Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM008
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/28/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 32 3 22
12:15 4 31 2 29
12:30 1 30 1 35
12:45 2 22 8 115 1 24 7 110 15 225
01:00 3 18 2 38
01:15 0 32 0 29
01:30 1 32 1 26
01:45 2 27 6 109 0 19 3 112 9 221
02:00 3 29 0 33
02:15 1 36 1 38
02:30 2 40 1 42
02:45 0 32 6 137 1 37 3 150 9 287
03:00 3 37 3 40
03:15 0 35 3 30
03:30 0 37 5 44
03:45 4 36 7 145 2 44 13 158 20 303
04:00 5 49 3 31
04:15 8 36 1 37
04:30 5 42 1 59
04:45 6 29 24 156 2 46 7 173 31 329
05:00 6 42 6 43
05:15 5 25 7 30
05:30 8 31 6 25
05:45 9 31 28 129 6 46 25 144 53 273
06:00 17 41 16 21
06:15 10 29 9 29
06:30 15 24 11 25
06:45 17 34 59 128 17 24 53 99 112 227
07:00 18 18 28 25
07:15 40 32 31 14
07:30 43 29 46 18
07:45 40 13 141 92 29 13 134 70 275 162
08:00 34 14 32 7
08:15 19 25 23 10
08:30 25 15 32 14
08:45 38 15 116 69 34 17 121 48 237 117
09:00 16 20 30 8
09:15 21 15 22 15
09:30 25 10 28 11
09:45 20 11 82 56 29 10 109 44 191 100
10:00 25 4 23 3
10:15 11 6 31 7
10:30 23 7 27 7
10:45 29 1 88 18 22 5 103 22 191 40
11:00 23 1 30 4
11:15 20 2 22 4
11:30 20 6 20 5
11:45 29 4 92 13 31 6 103 19 195 32
Total 657 1167 657 1167 681 1149 681 1149 1338 2316
Combined
Total 1824 1824 1830 1830 3654
AM Peak - 07:15 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 157 - - - 138 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.913 0.750
PM Peak - - 03:45 - - - 04:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 163 - - - 185 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.832 0.784

Percentag
e 36.0% 64.0% 37.2% 62.8%
ADT/AADT ADT 3,654 AADT 3,654

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A9
Buena Vista Avenue between Florida and Stetson

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

9 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Buena Vista St
From: Florida Ave To: Stetson Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 40 MPH
50 Percentile 34 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
10 MPH Pace 31-40 MPH
Percent in Pace 69%

Street Classification: Collector
Length of Street Segment: 1.26 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 6,485
Total Accidents: 13
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.45
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - CVC 627 (c)(1)(C); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29A.3 (residential density). Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, vulnerable pedestri an groups - church (CVC 627(c)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 29B) and Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 3 5 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds and conditions readily apparent, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 35 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code
☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Buena Vista Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Florida Avenue - Stetson Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 3 0 46 X X X 3
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 1 2 43 X X X 3 From: 11:30
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4
41 0 3 41 X X X 3 Time
40 1 3 40 X X X X 4 * To: 11:50
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 6 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 5 3 36 X X X X X X X X 8 A
35 6 1 35 X X X X X X X 7 C
34 2 5 34 X X X X X X X 7 E
33 2 4 33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 9 2 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
31 8 2 31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 0 4 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 16% 6% 14%
29 0 2 29 X X 2
28 0 2 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 62% 69%
27 0 2 27 X X 2
26 3 0 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 6% 32% 17%
25 0 2 25 X X 2
24 0 1 24 X 1 Average Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40MPH 32 - 41MPH 31 - 40MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:31 MPH 28 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:35 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:42 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Buena Vista Street
B/ Florida Avenue - Stetson Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM009
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 5/3/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 57 4 85
12:15 5 48 3 70
12:30 6 63 1 41
12:45 2 54 17 222 4 49 12 245 29 467
01:00 6 55 3 50
01:15 5 51 6 54
01:30 1 46 4 42
01:45 3 53 15 205 2 45 15 191 30 396
02:00 2 59 2 45
02:15 0 55 2 49
02:30 1 79 2 72
02:45 0 94 3 287 3 66 9 232 12 519
03:00 2 61 1 69
03:15 5 59 4 63
03:30 3 72 5 68
03:45 4 77 14 269 10 64 20 264 34 533
04:00 8 57 3 69
04:15 5 75 9 63
04:30 9 57 5 76
04:45 10 67 32 256 8 61 25 269 57 525
05:00 8 62 10 67
05:15 13 82 13 74
05:30 17 60 9 65
05:45 26 66 64 270 16 52 48 258 112 528
06:00 17 40 20 44
06:15 25 38 17 46
06:30 41 45 21 39
06:45 59 49 142 172 25 51 83 180 225 352
07:00 73 42 48 35
07:15 91 39 59 35
07:30 84 35 60 23
07:45 97 33 345 149 45 29 212 122 557 271
08:00 57 22 44 23
08:15 38 27 43 16
08:30 61 24 45 17
08:45 63 7 219 80 46 22 178 78 397 158
09:00 46 20 40 19
09:15 50 12 34 20
09:30 39 13 46 13
09:45 54 11 189 56 33 10 153 62 342 118
10:00 38 8 31 14
10:15 47 2 30 11
10:30 52 12 35 12
10:45 49 7 186 29 34 9 130 46 316 75
11:00 48 8 36 11
11:15 43 13 57 7
11:30 41 4 45 4
11:45 61 6 193 31 42 6 180 28 373 59
Total 1419 2026 1419 2026 1065 1975 1065 1975 2484 4001 Combined
Total 3445 3445 3040 3040 6485
AM Peak - 07:00 - - - 07:00 - - - - -
Vol. - 345 - - - 212 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.889 0.883
PM Peak - - 02:30 - - - 04:30 - - - -
Vol. - - 293 - - - 278 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.779 0.914

Percentag
e 41.2% 58.8% 35.0% 65.0%
ADT/AADT ADT 6,485 AADT 6,485

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A10
Buena Vista Avenue between Stetson and Chambers

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

10 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Buena Vista St
From: Stetson Ave To: Chambers St

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 39 MPH
50 Percentile 34 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace 32-41 MPH
Percent in Pace 67%

Street Classification: Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.43 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 6,204
Total Accidents: 3
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.03
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 30 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the existing posted speed, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 30 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code
☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Buena Vista Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Stetson Avenue - Chambers Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 11:50
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 * Time
40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * To: 12:15
39 4 3 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 2 8 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Existing
37 0 1 37 X 1 A Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 5 6 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
34 4 3 34 X X X X X X X 7 *
33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 4 1 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 1 0 31 X 1 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 3 1 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 0% 1%
29 5 3 29 X X X X X X X X 8
28 3 2 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 68% 72% 67%
27 1 1 27 X X 2
26 3 3 26 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 28% 32%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 1 2 24 X X X 3 Average Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36MPH 32 - 41MPH 32 - 41MPH 21 0 1 21 X 1
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:28 MPH 27 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:33 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Buena Vista Street
B/ Stetson Avenue - Chambers Street
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM010
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 4/12/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 40 4 47
12:15 8 68 2 42
12:30 9 39 3 37
12:45 4 38 25 185 2 34 11 160 36 345
01:00 1 45 4 38
01:15 5 53 3 47
01:30 3 42 7 30
01:45 6 73 15 213 1 40 15 155 30 368
02:00 1 45 1 42
02:15 2 55 2 47
02:30 1 96 3 43
02:45 1 59 5 255 4 58 10 190 15 445
03:00 2 75 5 49
03:15 4 52 8 51
03:30 4 68 14 37
03:45 2 86 12 281 13 48 40 185 52 466
04:00 1 80 13 46
04:15 5 76 22 44
04:30 3 61 25 56
04:45 6 92 15 309 21 61 81 207 96 516
05:00 6 73 24 73
05:15 6 89 33 62
05:30 4 103 35 50
05:45 10 78 26 343 25 51 117 236 143 579
06:00 9 68 43 37
06:15 24 46 43 48
06:30 22 69 36 38
06:45 44 60 99 243 36 29 158 152 257 395
07:00 50 43 51 22
07:15 64 52 68 27
07:30 72 38 54 24
07:45 48 38 234 171 47 16 220 89 454 260
08:00 59 37 52 17
08:15 59 25 59 10
08:30 63 49 44 23
08:45 58 33 239 144 41 12 196 62 435 206
09:00 45 28 30 13
09:15 44 25 35 13
09:30 33 20 42 9
09:45 41 22 163 95 36 11 143 46 306 141
10:00 32 21 31 9
10:15 20 12 38 7
10:30 29 17 33 4
10:45 31 9 112 59 33 7 135 27 247 86
11:00 31 4 31 6
11:15 44 12 26 5
11:30 42 5 34 4
11:45 35 7 152 28 39 1 130 16 282 44
Total 1097 2326 1097 2326 1256 1525 1256 1525 2353 3851 Combined
Total 3423 3423 2781 2781 6204
AM Peak - 07:15 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 243 - - - 221 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.844 0.813
PM Peak - - 04:45 - - - 04:30 - - - -
Vol. - - 357 - - - 252 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.867 0.863

Percentag
e 32.0% 68.0% 45.2% 54.8%
ADT/AADT ADT 6,204 AADT 6,204

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A11
California Avenue between Tres Cerritos and Devonshire

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

11 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: California Ave
From: Tres Cerritos Ave To: Devonshire Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/2/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 46 MPH
50 Percentile 39 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH
10 MPH Pace 36-45 MPH
Percent in Pace 61%

Street Classification: Collector
Length of Street Segment: 0.50 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 1,089
Total Accidents: 1
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.68
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: Speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CVC 22358.6(a); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a).

Consistent with speed limit set by County.

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 45 MPH

This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds, it is a ppropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 45 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:
☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code
☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: California Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Tres Cerritos Avenue - Devonshire Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:20
52 0 2 52 X X 2
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 11:10
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 3 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 1 4 46 X X X X X 5
45 2 5 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 *
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4 P
41 5 1 41 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 1 3 40 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 16% 24% 16%
39 8 4 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 70% 58% 61%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 18% 23%
35 3 1 35 X X X X 4
34 4 2 34 X X X X X X 6 Average Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 33 2 2 33 X X X X 4
32 3 1 32 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 34 - 43MPH 36 - 45MPH 36 - 45MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 1 30 X 1
29 1 0 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:34 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 28 0 1 28 X 1
27 1 0 27 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:44 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/2/23

21.B

City of Hemet
California Avenue
B/ Tres Cerritos Avenue - Devonshire Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM011
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 7 0 6
12:15 0 4 0 7
12:30 0 6 1 13
12:45 0 3 1 20 0 8 1 34 2 54
01:00 1 6 0 7
01:15 0 10 1 8
01:30 0 7 0 12
01:45 0 13 1 36 1 6 2 33 3 69
02:00 0 12 0 10
02:15 1 11 0 12
02:30 0 13 2 8
02:45 1 15 2 51 0 7 2 37 4 88
03:00 0 10 0 13
03:15 0 13 0 11
03:30 0 12 0 8
03:45 0 8 0 43 0 14 0 46 0 89
04:00 0 13 0 17
04:15 0 13 1 14
04:30 1 11 5 18
04:45 1 18 2 55 2 6 8 55 10 110
05:00 1 5 0 6
05:15 2 9 2 11
05:30 2 12 8 12
05:45 3 10 8 36 2 10 12 39 20 75
06:00 3 6 4 6
06:15 1 11 5 8
06:30 3 7 4 4
06:45 5 10 12 34 8 11 21 29 33 63
07:00 3 3 7 2
07:15 6 7 4 5
07:30 7 7 13 2
07:45 4 9 20 26 11 1 35 10 55 36
08:00 7 3 9 5
08:15 8 5 6 2
08:30 10 2 5 2
08:45 2 3 27 13 13 6 33 15 60 28
09:00 10 6 9 13
09:15 11 5 7 7
09:30 5 4 8 4
09:45 4 3 30 18 9 4 33 28 63 46
10:00 13 3 11 6
10:15 11 2 7 3
10:30 5 3 10 1
10:45 10 2 39 10 10 2 38 12 77 22
11:00 10 2 8 2
11:15 10 3 11 0
11:30 8 1 5 0
11:45 9 1 37 7 11 1 35 3 72 10
Total 179 349 179 349 220 341 220 341 399 690
Combined
Total 528 528 561 561 1089
AM Peak - 10:00 - - - 07:30 - - - - -
Vol. - 39 - - - 39 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.750 0.750
PM Peak - - 04:00 - - - 03:45 - - - -
Vol. - - 55 - - - 63 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.764 0.875

Percentag
e 33.9% 66.1% 39.2% 60.8%
ADT/AADT ADT 1,089 AADT 1,089

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A12
California Avenue between Devonshire and Florida

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

12 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: California Ave
From: Devonshire Ave To: Florida Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/2/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 52 MPH
50 Percentile 46 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH
10 MPH Pace 43-52 MPH
Percent in Pace 72%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.50 miles
Average Daily Traffic: 7,811
Total Accidents: 4
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 0.94
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.05
Justification: Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 45 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the existing posted speed, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 45 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: California Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Devonshire Avenue - Florida Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 11:10
52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
51 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 11:30
49 2 5 49 X X X X X X X 7 P
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 A Existing
47 2 7 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 *
43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 5 2 42 X X X X X X X 7
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 18% 4% 5%
39 4 1 39 X X X X X 5
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 68% 80% 72%
37 0 2 37 X X 2
36 0 1 36 X 1 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 23%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50MPH 43 - 52MPH 43 - 52MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:41 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/2/23

21.B

City of Hemet
California Avenue
B/ Devonshire Avenue - Florida Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM012
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 47 8 57
12:15 3 51 8 64
12:30 4 56 4 54
12:45 3 40 12 194 4 57 24 232 36 426
01:00 2 43 4 66
01:15 4 44 4 70
01:30 3 49 5 66
01:45 7 55 16 191 3 74 16 276 32 467
02:00 2 57 6 60
02:15 4 47 6 71
02:30 1 67 6 61
02:45 3 59 10 230 2 90 20 282 30 512
03:00 4 54 9 84
03:15 2 64 12 76
03:30 2 73 19 94
03:45 6 65 14 256 14 82 54 336 68 592
04:00 6 66 28 95
04:15 5 75 30 87
04:30 5 87 44 91
04:45 6 85 22 313 28 79 130 352 152 665
05:00 14 64 32 87
05:15 24 70 40 100
05:30 20 74 61 85
05:45 20 72 78 280 56 90 189 362 267 642
06:00 36 67 68 60
06:15 39 54 79 63
06:30 40 50 84 48
06:45 52 53 167 224 80 40 311 211 478 435
07:00 57 31 88 38
07:15 51 43 86 31
07:30 46 33 94 35
07:45 47 45 201 152 76 26 344 130 545 282
08:00 49 27 79 26
08:15 52 36 88 22
08:30 47 27 56 23
08:45 40 25 188 115 65 20 288 91 476 206
09:00 51 25 63 26
09:15 37 22 57 25
09:30 45 14 61 20
09:45 34 24 167 85 46 12 227 83 394 168
10:00 36 21 51 12
10:15 37 18 40 15
10:30 25 15 64 18
10:45 38 10 136 64 51 12 206 57 342 121
11:00 39 15 64 11
11:15 52 7 57 14
11:30 44 7 64 8
11:45 40 6 175 35 45 2 230 35 405 70
Total 1186 2139 1186 2139 2039 2447 2039 2447 3225 4586 Combined
Total 3325 3325 4486 4486 7811
AM Peak - 06:45 - - - 06:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 206 - - - 348 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.904 0.926
PM Peak - - 04:00 - - - 05:00 - - - -
Vol. - - 313 - - - 362 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.899 0.905

Percentag
e 35.7% 64.3% 45.5% 54.5%
ADT/AADT ADT 7,811 AADT 7,811

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A13
Cawston Avenue between Menlo and Devonshire

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

13 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Cawston Ave
From: Menlo Ave To: Devonshire Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/2/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 45 MPH
50 Percentile 38 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH
10 MPH Pace 33-42 MPH
Percent in Pace 68%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.50 Miles
Average Daily Traffic: 8,515
Total Accidents: 1
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 0.21
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 30 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds , it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 30 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Cawston Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Menlo Avenue - Devonshire Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:50
49 2 1 49 X X X 3
48 0 2 48 X X 2 Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
46 2 3 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4
43 2 1 43 X X X 3
42 5 1 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 5 1 41 X X X X X X 6 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 22% 26% 23%
39 0 6 39 X X X X X X 6 P
38 6 2 38 X X X X X X X X 8 A % In Pace: 72% 68% 68%
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 E % Under Pace: 6% 6% 9%
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 6 3 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 33 4 3 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 33 - 42MPH 32 - 41MPH 33 - 42MPH 31 1 1 31 X X 2
30 0 1 30 X 1
29 1 0 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH 28 0 1 28 X 1
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:38 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/2/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Cawston Avenue
B/ Menlo Avenue - Devonshire Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM013
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/28/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Tue Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 54 4 62
12:15 8 54 4 67
12:30 1 44 5 60
12:45 3 49 16 201 6 65 19 254 35 455
01:00 1 63 3 56
01:15 5 49 3 81
01:30 0 76 2 62
01:45 4 73 10 261 0 46 8 245 18 506
02:00 1 73 1 45
02:15 0 54 4 134
02:30 1 64 6 92
02:45 1 59 3 250 5 78 16 349 19 599
03:00 2 69 2 72
03:15 0 93 4 81
03:30 4 112 4 109
03:45 3 101 9 375 9 134 19 396 28 771
04:00 3 74 16 144
04:15 4 75 16 104
04:30 1 98 14 94
04:45 5 77 13 324 17 103 63 445 76 769
05:00 7 111 25 104
05:15 3 92 29 95
05:30 11 87 22 106
05:45 15 88 36 378 32 83 108 388 144 766
06:00 12 73 43 67
06:15 19 62 35 66
06:30 31 61 45 49
06:45 66 49 128 245 58 54 181 236 309 481
07:00 93 55 82 44
07:15 116 52 125 40
07:30 48 48 118 30
07:45 56 40 313 195 93 35 418 149 731 344
08:00 106 47 108 23
08:15 77 40 129 18
08:30 85 29 127 20
08:45 69 25 337 141 122 13 486 74 823 215
09:00 38 33 61 20
09:15 42 28 59 13
09:30 35 24 43 18
09:45 32 20 147 105 57 16 220 67 367 172
10:00 35 18 51 4
10:15 28 11 48 11
10:30 32 17 43 11
10:45 33 15 128 61 52 10 194 36 322 97
11:00 49 8 43 5
11:15 45 8 56 4
11:30 46 11 68 7
11:45 48 7 188 34 56 7 223 23 411 57
Total 1328 2570 1328 2570 1955 2662 1955 2662 3283 5232 Combined
Total 3898 3898 4617 4617 8515
AM Peak - 08:00 - - - 08:00 - - - - -
Vol. - 337 - - - 486 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.795 0.942
PM Peak - - 03:15 - - - 03:30 - - - -
Vol. - - 380 - - - 491 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.848 0.852

Percentag
e 34.1% 65.9% 42.3% 57.7%
ADT/AADT ADT 8,515 AADT 8,515

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A14
Cawston Avenue between Devonshire and Florida

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

14 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Radar
Enforceable?
NO
Street: Cawston Ave
From: Devonshire Ave To: Florida Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 6/13/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 51 MPH
50 Percentile 46 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit Not Posted
10 MPH Pace 42-51 MPH
Percent in Pace 68%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.48 Miles
Average Daily Traffic: 5,974
Total Accidents: 4
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.27
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: None.

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted

This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds , it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit remains not posted along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:
☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Cawston Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Devonshire Avenue - Acacia Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 2 55 X X X 3
54 2 1 54 X X X 3 Time
53 0 2 53 X X 2 From: 1:20
52 2 1 52 X X X 3
51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 * Time
50 4 2 50 X X X X X X 6 * To: 1:40
49 1 2 49 X X X 3 *
48 4 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Existing
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 A Speed Limit: N / PMPH
46 6 4 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4 E
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 66% 68% 67%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 22% 20% 21%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51MPH 42 - 51MPH 42 - 51MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/13/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Cawston Avenue
B/ Devonshire Avenue - Acacia Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM013B
Site Code: 232-23157B

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 6/8/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 7 42 5 33
12:15 5 51 1 54
12:30 4 48 5 44
12:45 3 47 19 188 2 50 13 181 32 369
01:00 5 63 1 53
01:15 2 46 2 49
01:30 3 52 1 53
01:45 2 61 12 222 5 42 9 197 21 419
02:00 6 50 3 46
02:15 1 48 6 47
02:30 1 59 4 62
02:45 1 56 9 213 5 49 18 204 27 417
03:00 3 49 9 38
03:15 1 66 9 68
03:30 1 70 3 58
03:45 4 69 9 254 15 60 36 224 45 478
04:00 3 66 18 53
04:15 3 50 8 63
04:30 3 53 11 53
04:45 3 71 12 240 15 63 52 232 64 472
05:00 1 80 21 62
05:15 10 70 20 49
05:30 7 68 22 40
05:45 7 60 25 278 21 59 84 210 109 488
06:00 9 58 21 49
06:15 9 55 32 44
06:30 15 52 39 47
06:45 19 40 52 205 33 30 125 170 177 375
07:00 23 37 29 42
07:15 24 43 50 27
07:30 20 46 50 33
07:45 28 35 95 161 44 23 173 125 268 286
08:00 32 32 37 28
08:15 48 30 54 26
08:30 21 32 67 22
08:45 29 35 130 129 56 37 214 113 344 242
09:00 26 24 46 38
09:15 22 21 41 46
09:30 26 22 27 27
09:45 29 27 103 94 30 20 144 131 247 225
10:00 30 25 30 25
10:15 25 13 36 24
10:30 34 14 37 22
10:45 43 8 132 60 34 19 137 90 269 150
11:00 25 7 41 19
11:15 32 4 52 21
11:30 42 11 55 18
11:45 40 4 139 26 63 16 211 74 350 100
Total 737 2070 737 2070 1216 1951 1216 1951 1953 4021
Combined
Total 2807 2807 3167 3167 5974
AM Peak - 10:45 - - - 08:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 142 - - - 223 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.826 0.832
PM Peak - - 04:45 - - - 04:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 289 - - - 241 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.903 0.956

Percentag
e 26.3% 73.7% 38.4% 61.6%
ADT/AADT ADT 5,974 AADT 5,974

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A15
Cawston Avenue between Stetson and Mustang

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

15 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Cawston Ave
From: Stetson Ave To: Mustang Way

Date of Speed Survey: 3/7/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 44 MPH
50 Percentile 40 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
10 MPH Pace 36-45 MPH
Percent in Pace 77%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.81 Miles
Average Daily Traffic: 6,815
Total Accidents: 8
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.32
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit (CVC 22358.8(a); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12ag).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on existing posted speed , it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 35 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code
☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Cawston Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Stetson Avenue - Mustang Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:55
52 0 1 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 1:20
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 1 3 45 X X X X 4 *
44 1 2 44 X X X 3 *
43 3 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
41 7 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 C % Over Pace: 14% 12% 11%
39 8 7 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
38 3 6 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 74% 82% 77%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4 *
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 12% 6% 12%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH
33 3 0 33 X X X 3
32 1 1 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 34 - 43MPH 36 - 45MPH 36 - 45MPH 31 2 0 31 X X 2
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:34 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:43 MPH 45 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/7/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Cawston Avenue
B/ Stetson Avenue - Mustang Way
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM014
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 3/23/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 6 36 12 39
12:15 6 39 5 56
12:30 3 50 7 51
12:45 5 37 20 162 3 43 27 189 47 351
01:00 3 45 1 47
01:15 6 70 7 52
01:30 1 49 6 71
01:45 2 45 12 209 2 63 16 233 28 442
02:00 0 38 3 72
02:15 1 102 2 60
02:30 1 38 3 50
02:45 4 51 6 229 3 57 11 239 17 468
03:00 3 45 4 63
03:15 3 63 2 87
03:30 6 131 6 92
03:45 10 80 22 319 5 82 17 324 39 643
04:00 12 57 5 83
04:15 10 43 4 83
04:30 14 44 4 84
04:45 14 54 50 198 5 67 18 317 68 515
05:00 17 43 10 65
05:15 26 54 2 83
05:30 31 65 3 70
05:45 29 37 103 199 5 69 20 287 123 486
06:00 29 48 7 72
06:15 29 47 16 71
06:30 21 40 18 62
06:45 42 31 121 166 39 47 80 252 201 418
07:00 71 37 68 58
07:15 111 29 112 46
07:30 83 38 37 43
07:45 63 20 328 124 47 47 264 194 592 318
08:00 57 28 99 39
08:15 82 28 141 41
08:30 69 26 61 34
08:45 56 27 264 109 47 38 348 152 612 261
09:00 34 18 39 31
09:15 35 15 31 30
09:30 35 30 32 27
09:45 40 17 144 80 35 13 137 101 281 181
10:00 37 16 35 30
10:15 28 12 22 17
10:30 26 9 30 20
10:45 36 4 127 41 30 19 117 86 244 127
11:00 42 2 26 13
11:15 35 5 45 10
11:30 36 7 33 10
11:45 37 4 150 18 43 5 147 38 297 56
Total 1347 1854 1347 1854 1202 2412 1202 2412 2549 4266 Combined
Total 3201 3201 3614 3614 6815
AM Peak - 07:00 - - - 07:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 328 - - - 348 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.739 0.617
PM Peak - - 03:15 - - - 03:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 331 - - - 344 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.632 0.935

Percentag
e 42.1% 57.9% 33.3% 66.7%
ADT/AADT ADT 6,815 AADT 6,815

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A16
Columbia Street between Park and Devonshire

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

16 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Columbia St
From: Park Ave To: Devonshire Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/28/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 40 MPH
50 Percentile 35 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH
10 MPH Pace 31-40 MPH
Percent in Pace 80%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.23 Miles
Average Daily Traffic: 2,774
Total Accidents: 1
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 1.43
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding down, the speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed (CVC 22358.6(b); CA-MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 1) - Accident rate higher than statewide average (CVC 627(b)(2); CA -MUTCD Section 2B.13, Option 16E).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds and conditions not readily apparent, it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 35 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☒ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☐ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Columbia Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Park Avenue - Devonshire Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 3 44 X X X 3 Time
43 1 4 43 X X X X X 5 From: 12:20
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * To: 1:15
39 6 4 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 * Existing
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 A
35 6 7 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
34 4 6 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
33 5 5 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 *
31 4 0 31 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 2 1 30 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 4% 18% 11%
29 1 1 29 X X 2
28 0 1 28 X 1 % In Pace: 84% 76% 80%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 2 0 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 6% 9%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40MPH 32 - 41MPH 31 - 40MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:31 MPH 33 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:39 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/28/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Columbia Avenue
B/ Park Avenue - Devonshire Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM015
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 4/19/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 19 2 23
12:15 1 21 2 16
12:30 2 18 4 25
12:45 0 14 4 72 1 20 9 84 13 156
01:00 1 16 0 23
01:15 0 18 1 16
01:30 1 24 3 24
01:45 1 23 3 81 0 42 4 105 7 186
02:00 4 27 5 39
02:15 4 24 1 38
02:30 4 24 2 21
02:45 2 31 14 106 0 26 8 124 22 230
03:00 5 26 1 35
03:15 8 21 2 35
03:30 10 20 1 23
03:45 15 30 38 97 0 32 4 125 42 222
04:00 13 20 2 35
04:15 10 24 1 29
04:30 14 27 5 38
04:45 19 16 56 87 4 20 12 122 68 209
05:00 13 21 6 23
05:15 9 21 1 35
05:30 14 18 4 30
05:45 9 21 45 81 10 22 21 110 66 191
06:00 20 15 9 22
06:15 27 21 10 18
06:30 23 15 11 19
06:45 19 17 89 68 22 15 52 74 141 142
07:00 24 7 26 21
07:15 25 16 34 15
07:30 34 12 29 18
07:45 23 11 106 46 18 16 107 70 213 116
08:00 12 8 20 11
08:15 18 9 18 14
08:30 13 19 16 14
08:45 15 17 58 53 12 15 66 54 124 107
09:00 10 8 12 12
09:15 9 5 16 9
09:30 22 7 19 2
09:45 19 6 60 26 20 5 67 28 127 54
10:00 12 2 19 5
10:15 13 4 20 5
10:30 17 2 19 10
10:45 19 3 61 11 14 4 72 24 133 35
11:00 19 4 13 10
11:15 20 0 22 3
11:30 13 1 17 3
11:45 13 3 65 8 25 4 77 20 142 28
Total 599 736 599 736 499 940 499 940 1098 1676
Combined
Total 1335 1335 1439 1439 2774
AM Peak - 07:00 - - - 06:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 106 - - - 111 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.779 0.816
PM Peak - - 02:00 - - - 01:30 - - - -
Vol. - - 106 - - - 143 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.855 0.851

Percentag
e 44.9% 55.1% 34.7% 65.3%
ADT/AADT ADT 2,774 AADT 2,774

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A17
Columbia Street between Devonshire and Florida

21.B

CITY OF HEMET CITY

ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY

17 Radar
Enforceable?
YES

David DiPierro, TE
STC Traffic, Inc.

Street: Columbia St
From: Devonshire Ave To: Florida Ave

Date of Speed Survey: 3/28/2023
Critical Speed (85th) 39 MPH
50 Percentile 36 MPH
Existing Posted Speed Limit Not Posted
10 MPH Pace 31-40 MPH
Percent in Pace 78%

Street Classification: Secondary (Undivided)
Length of Street Segment: 0.23 Miles
Average Daily Traffic: 3,647
Total Accidents: 3
Evaluation Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020
Accident Rate (MVM): 3.27
California Statewide Accidents Rate (MVM): 1.29
Justification: When the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th -percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used (CVC 22358.6(c); CA - MUTCD Section 2B.13, Standard 12a, Option 2).

TRAFFIC ENGINEER’S RECOMMENDATIONS/AUTHORITY:

Posted Speed Limit: 35 MPH
This survey was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code using methods prescribed in Section 2B.13 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based on the measured critical speeds , it is appropriate and justified to recommend the posted speed limit be 35 MPH along the subject segment of the road.

APPROVALS:

☐ Recertification of the existing speed zone per Sections 22357, 22358, and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code

☒ Establishment of new speed zone

APPROVED: DATE
: October 25, 2023

21.B

MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Columbia Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Devonshire Avenue - Florida Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 11:50
42 1 1 42 X X 2
41 2 2 41 X X X X 4 Time
40 1 5 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:20
39 5 0 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 6 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Existing
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 6 5 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
35 8 1 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 1 4 33 X X X X X 5 *
32 5 2 32 X X X X X X X 7 *
31 1 6 31 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 1 3 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 82% 76% 78%
27 2 1 27 X X X 3
26 1 1 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 12% 13%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41MPH 31 - 40MPH 31 - 40MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:31 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:35 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Hemet
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/28/23

21.B

City of Hemet
Columbia Avenue
B/ Devonshire Avenue - Florida Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count

HEM016
Site Code: 232-23157

Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: [email protected]

Start 4/19/23 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 26 2 24
12:15 0 23 1 29
12:30 1 18 1 19
12:45 0 24 4 91 3 33 7 105 11 196
01:00 2 21 4 32
01:15 2 29 2 24
01:30 2 23 2 29
01:45 0 20 6 93 1 27 9 112 15 205
02:00 2 22 0 30
02:15 1 33 2 27
02:30 4 34 4 34
02:45 3 39 10 128 0 53 6 144 16 272
03:00 3 36 5 49
03:15 6 24 0 42
03:30 1 37 2 29
03:45 2 30 12 127 0 25 7 145 19 272
04:00 6 37 1 47
04:15 7 31 3 48
04:30 11 38 4 28
04:45 15 35 39 141 2 47 10 170 49 311
05:00 12 27 1 38
05:15 11 36 2 50
05:30 14 32 6 35
05:45 18 20 55 115 6 36 15 159 70 274
06:00 15 33 11 25
06:15 12 28 9 44
06:30 19 30 6 37
06:45 20 22 66 113 11 33 37 139 103 252
07:00 26 24 22 25
07:15 35 27 13 31
07:30 24 22 23 18
07:45 34 25 119 98 24 25 82 99 201 197
08:00 31 20 35 18
08:15 27 13 39 22
08:30 41 16 40 23
08:45 31 14 130 63 23 21 137 84 267 147
09:00 15 13 19 16
09:15 14 16 32 15
09:30 25 21 24 13
09:45 22 18 76 68 19 23 94 67 170 135
10:00 19 10 14 10
10:15 19 11 17 13
10:30 17 11 26 3
10:45 22 2 77 34 24 9 81 35 158 69
11:00 22 5 23 4
11:15 19 3 27 9
11:30 26 2 26 9
11:45 30 7 97 17 19 7 95 29 192 46
Total 691 1088 691 1088 580 1288 580 1288 1271 2376
Combined
Total 1779 1779 1868 1868 3647
AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 133 - - - 138 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.811 0.863
PM Peak - - 02:15 - - - 02:30 - - - -
Vol. - - 142 - - - 178 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.910 0.840

Percentag
e 38.8% 61.2% 31.0% 69.0%
ADT/AADT ADT 3,647 AADT 3,647

21.B

Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits

City of Imperial Beach City of City of

Appendix A18
Cornell Street between Park and Florida