10/18/21, 2:36 PM MIG, Inc. Mail - FW: Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/? k=645daf7b10&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a%3Ar5364197495337187473&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-a%3Ar53… 1/1 Sou Garner <[email protected]>
FW: Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project
Sou Garner <[email protected]> Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:35 PM To: Sou Garner <[email protected]>
From: Adriaan Vanderzwan
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2021 5:31 AM
To: Robert Reber <[email protected]>
Subject Franklin Canyon RV Re ort Project
I feel change may be good for our area, but totally eliminating a golf cour e i too dra tic The be t outcome would be an executive 9 hole course with a smaller space triple deck driving range and practice putting green. Open space for hikers is already plentiful. The nearest 9 hole golf courses are far away, Concord and Oakland making golf for seniors more difficult to access. Please consider this alternative.
From:
To: Robert Reber
Subject: Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project
Date: Thursday, October 7, 2021 11:10:30 AM
Please keep the golf course and add a couple restaurants instead or replacing it with an RV park. Considering Hercules does not technically have a downtown, the removal of the golf course would be a to the community.
Regards
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments.
From:
To: Robert Reber; Hector Rubio; Lori Martin; Chris Kelley; Dion Bailey; Alex Walker-Griffin; Dan Romero; Tiffany Grimsley; Irina Galieva; Kenneth Morrison; Robert Schaufenbil Subject: Planning Commission Mtg - Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project Date: Monday, October 4, 2021 9:32:05 PM
Dear Members of the Hercules Planning Commission & City Council:
I was on the call this evening as one of 5 members of the public that voiced feedback, all of which were not in favor of the current plan for the RV Park. Not one member of the public voiced comments in favor of the project. The 132 page document of public letters from May, 2021, also did not include any positive comments in favor of the project. I would like to know how many voiced letters in favor vs not in favor. It was mentioned there were positive letters but somehow they do not appear in the 132 page document.
Patricia Curtain mentioned that the project for the RV park was already determined to be in alignment with Measure M in 2019. When even one of the writers of Measure M, Richard Sneider says this project is inconsistent with the intent of Measure M and a former Hercules Planning Commissioner, Melinda Manzo, who was closely involved with Measure M also says there is no way one could reach the conclusion that this project is consistent with Measure M, this leads me to question the sincerity of that original determination.
Now we
hear it's been a done deal since 2019 and so it essentially doesn't matter if it aligns with Measure M or not because a prior commission determined it was consistent.
Patricia also noted that there was significant public outreach based on what is legally required back in 2019.
I'd like to know exactly what that public outreach consisted of because I find it odd that 60+ people were at the orignal meeting, and then no public dissent when deciding if the proposed project meets Measure M, which was voted on by the residents of Hercules.
And
only now when it's a done deal do we hear public dissent.
And finally, let's take Measure M out of the equation for a moment. Do the residents of Hercules want this RV Park? Everything I've heard and seen tells me no, they do not - at least not the majority that recently voiced feedback. Just because a former planning commision determined it matches measure M, doesn't change the fact that many members of the public voiced legitimate concerns about the RV Park.
Sincerely,
-Kathleen Carter
From:
To: Robert Reber
Cc: Ken Morrison; Christine Kelley
Subject: RV Resort
Date: Sunday, October 3, 2021 2:42:30 PM
Dear Mr. Reber and Planning Commission
I am writing in favor of the proposed Recreational Vehicle Resort. I understand some residents have concerns. I highly recommend there be a great deal more information shared with the community about this which includes mailers and perhaps an opportunity for the public to view a scaled model and ask the developer questions. It is my impression that those who are opposed have never camped at an RV Resort. I have, many times.
The differences between regular RV campgrounds and RV Resorts are considerable. For many years I was able to vacation during the summer with two small children and a dog to beautiful national parks as well as to San Diego and Disneyland in complete safety and comfort.
Although we did not have a fancy rig (we camped with a VW Vanagon and later a Coleman Tent Trailer,) I always selected the resorts for safety, cleanliness, full hook-ups, location, beauty and the great amenities.
Staying at an RV resort is like staying at a hotel but
you are bringing your own little apartment.
It was my observation during those years that those who enjoyed RV resorts typically were seniors enjoying retirement and visiting places in the United States they were never able to previously visit, and young families like mine with small children and pets.
We enjoyed swimming pools, hot tubs, playgrounds, beautiful views, enclosed clean dog runs, convenience stores, small coffee shops or snack bars, even bike rentals, golf and miniature golf at some locations. While
it has been many years since my family RV'd, I have many wonderful memories of the places we were able to visit in safety and comfort and it was all affordable.
My only concern is the RV storage option. I think there should be enforced time limits and specifications as to the size and type of RV to be stored as well as required padlocks, etc. I also suggest the KOA style tent cabins be limited in number and maintained and kept in pristine condition with strict limits on the amount of time a guest can stay.
I also would like to
suggest that the proposed Driving Range be replaced with a Miniature Golf Course which would be greatly enjoyed by the family-oriented Hercules and would bring in revenue.
Miniature golf provides a safe, fun, family activity and is also fun for teens looking for something safe and fun to enjoy.
Please do not hesitate to share my input. I can be reached at:
Susan Keeffe
Regards,
Susan Keeffe
From:
To: Robert Schaufenbil; Robert Reber; Nicole Sacramento; Irina Galieva; Kenneth Morrison; Hector Rubio Cc: City Council
Subject: Re: Oct. 4 Planning Commission Meeting: Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project Date: Saturday, October 2, 2021 10:54:47 AM
Dear Commissioners,
Several years ago I was a member of the Hercules Planning Commission when a vision for the Franklin Canyon Golf Course was presented. At that time a new clubhouse, restaurant and resort hotel were proposed. The water issue was going to be addressed just as it is at other golf courses, i.e. use of recycled/gray water and careful
placement of the "greens".
The current proposal represents a significant downgrade of a concept that would have created an impressive eastern gateway to Hercules. Instead, the proposed RV "Resort" is simply a typical RV hookup, dump station and campground similar to KOA and others typically found on routes to National Parks. These facilities are intended to provide services and storage for
the motorhome and travel trailer community. This project would replace a very attractive and popular regional asset with a marginal and unattractive yard for RV's.
I respectfully recommend that you deny the proposal and send the project's proponents back to the drawing board. The Franklin Canyon Golf course has great potential. Please don't surrender it to this low value use.
Richard Mitchell
Hercules resident since 1985
Planning Commissioner for fourteen years
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:37 AM Robert Reber <[email protected] > wrote:
Hello Planning Commissioners,
The agenda packet for the Planning Commission meeting on Monday, Oct. 4, is now available on the City’s web site. The Planning Commission will be continuing the public hearing from Sept. 20 for the Franklin Canyon RV Resort project.
Robert Reber, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Hercules
510-799-8248
[email protected]
9/29/21, 9:46 PM MIG, Inc. Mail - FW: Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=645daf7b10&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a%3Ar1462659298625472513&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-a%3Ar14… 1/1 Sou Garner <[email protected]>
FW: Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project
Sou Garner <[email protected]> Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:03 PM To: Sou Garner <[email protected]>
From:
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 1:12 PM
To Robert Reber RReber@ci hercule ca u
Subject: Franklin Canyon RV Resort Project
The addition of the Franklin Cayon RV Resort, is the perfect fit for our small city. As someone who is familiar with RV camping this will bring much need recreation and income to our community. Golf is a privileged sport that has many deeply rooted issues aside from the insane amount of money spent to water a non native invasive species. I have driven from the Bay Area to Petaluma and Pe cadero to utilize there KOA facilitie and ugge t u ing them a proof that the concept works and will remain viable for the foreseeable future. Thank you all for consideration and I look forward to welcoming the Franklin Canyon RV resort to our community.
Randall Dunevant
Commissioners,
I was very heartened to hear concerns expressed about the assault this project is making against Measure M and the desires of Hercules residents.
I extracted the following narrative from the packet provided for the Planning Commission meeting Sept 20, 2021 … In issuing the zoning clearance determination, the Community Development Director found the Project to be consistent with the purposes of Measure M “because it does not propose to develop any area of Franklin Canyon outside the envelope of the current existing golf course and therefore continues to preserve and protect nearby open space lands and surrounding areas for agriculture, outdoor recreation, very low-density residential, and open space uses.”
I think the Community Director came to an incorrect conclusion. The above statement ignores the interest and protection of the residents of Hercules.
As stated in Measure M, its purpose is to protect Franklin Canyon and nearby open space lands from harmful and unnecessary development. The ordinance maintains existing use of the Canyon and surrounding areas for agriculture, outdoor recreation, very low-density residential and open space uses. The objectives are to preserve and protect natural resources, watersheds and water quality, wildlife habitat, beauty and tranquility, and scenic hill views, while permitting proximity to nature and outdoor recreation for the residents of Hercules.
The Community Development Director left out, or ignored, the consideration of beauty, tranquility and impact on Hercules residents.
Creating a parking lot for 158 RVs and storage for 50 others does not fit within the intended purpose. RVs are not outdoor recreation … they are simply a means of transportation from one RV park to the next.
Allowing the current front 9 holes of the golf course to be converted into an RV parking lot simply does not allow for beauty and tranquility or scenic views.
Additionally, at night the golf course is currently a very peaceful and tranquil area. If the RV parking lot is approved, how do you think the residents of Hercules will accept having to listen to 158 generators, loud music, and other rambunctious noises on a nightly basis.
If approved, this project will destroy the current peaceful and tranquil area and turn it into an eye sore that has the potential to be a significant burden on current police, fire and other Hercules resources.
It is good to know Mr. Schneider is now available to consult with you regarding the original intent of Measure M, although I wonder why he was not initially consulted by the Community Development Director.
Commissioners, I believe that moving this project forward is not in the best interest of Hercules residents.
Jim Taylor
From:
To: Robert Reber
Subject: Franklin+Canyon+RV+Resort+Project
Date: Sunday, September 26, 2021 11:52:58 PM
As a 32-year resident of Hercules, I strongly support the RV Resort project as a positive contribution to our community that is a great fit for the difficult zoning requirements of that area. It will provide much needed tax revenue and local spending with very little impact.
As an RV owner, I am familiar with this type of project. The restrictions on this project will allow it to remain a positive destination while not becoming misused.
The Bay Area has few if any high end locations for RV visitors to stay that provide safe, quality accommodations close to desirable tourist attractions like the Napa, Sonoma, Suisun,
and Lodi wine countries, Discovery Kingdom, and the many other cities and outdoor activities our area has to offer.
Please move to approve this project.
Scott A. Wyatt
From: Shiva Matinpour
To: Robert Reber
Subject: FW: 9/20 Planning Commission Meeting
Date: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:58:26 PM
Shiva Matinpour
Community Development Specialist
smatinpour@ci hercules.ca.us
City of Hercules -111 Civic Drive-Hercules, CA 94547
Tel: 510 799 8244
Please be advised City offices are closed on Fridays.
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:33 PM
To: Shiva Matinpour <[email protected]>
Subject: 9/20 Planning Commission Meeting
Hi,
I have a meeting for the owners of Franklin Canyon Golf Course.
I realize you have made an effort to plan this proposed RV Park but did you consider alternatives to keep this a golf course- things like approaching local cities, county, East Bay Parks, to lease or contract the golf course? Perhaps a consortium of entities would have been able to continue with a golf course.
Thanks!
Nancy Arms
Sent from my iPhone
From:
To: Robert Reber
Subject: Horse Trailer Parking at Franklin Canyon Golf Course Date: Thursday, September 2, 2021 8:35:03 AM
"The project would add approximately 70 acres (not 700) of public open space to the John Muir Land Trust's Fernandez Ranch property, with public parking and new trailhead access from what is now the golf course parking lot along Highway 4. Although there are no horse trailer parking spaces in the current design plans, that would be a very relevant issue to raise for the Planning Commission to consider. Because access off and on to Highway 4 is much easier from the golf course than Christie Road--especially for vehicles pulling a trailer--I would recommend that the applicants and JMLT revise the parking lot to accommodate an appropriate number of trailer parking spaces." My name is Joni Hiramoto. I am a Contra Costa County resident who boards a horse in Martinez. The Fernandez Ranch property is a wonderful and close area for trail riding.
However, my friends and I currently don't use it much because the driveway on and off Highway 4 is not a proper ramp and is so short and requires a 270 degree right turn to head eastbound on Highway 4. It is dangerous for hauling a horse in a trailer.
I would request that the applicants and JMLT revise the parking lot to accommodate an appropriate number of horse trailer parking spaces. There are many places that board horses in Martinez and Briones whose horse owners would welcome this accommodation.
Thank you.
Joni Hiramoto
Resident of El Cerrito, CA
From:
To: Irina Galieva; Kenneth Morrison; Robert Schaufenbil; Hector Rubio; Robert Reber; Shiva Matinpour Subject: Public comment on the Project to convert Franklin Canyon Golf Course to an RV Resort Date: Monday, September 6, 2021 11:51:37 AM
Hercules Planning Commission,
I submit this public comment on behalf of the Bicycle Trail Council of the East Bay membership for the September Planning Commission meetings. We support the project converting the Franklin Canyon golf course property to a campground, creating a second trail head to the John Muir Land Trust Fernandez Ranch property, and the addition of 70 acres on the west end of the existing golf course property to the John Muir Land Trust Fernandez Ranch property.
The project
provides increased opportunities for public access to open spaces.
Regarding the trail head at Franklin Canyon we would like to see consideration to provide parking for horse trailers and consideration for disabled access to trails and facilities.
Trails are a shared access for a wide variety of trail users and we support access and positive trail experiences for all trail users.
We are disappointed that this project does not include a means of bicycle access without traveling on highway 4. If there is a way to include that in this project that would be a great benefit although it does not appear to include properties connecting to bike accessible public roadways.
Currently there is no northern
means of access to Fernandez Ranch by bicycle. We would like the planning commission to consider bicycle access to this new trailhead and additional access from the neighborhoods to the west of Fernandez in future planning and projects.
Potential future access points could include potential trail access points #1,2,3 identified in the 2013 Initial Study for Bicycle access is important to those that don't have ready access to motor vehicles and to reducing traffic and environmental impact.
Regards,
Scott Bartlebaugh
Advocacy Director, Bicycle Trails Council of the East Bay
From:
To: Robert Reber
Subject: Needed trailer parking at Franklin Canyon Golf Course Date: Friday, September 3, 2021 10:47:54 PM
Hi Robert: I commented on this earlier in the summer to someone associated with the John Muir Land Trust regarding horse trailer parking at Franklin Canyon Golf course (and the need for a watering trough). I also gave some input regarding the plans for the "campsites" and wondered if the campsite developers would consider including a couple of spots for overnight horse camping. I live on Franklin Canyon Rd closer to Alhambra exit. It would be nice to be able to park down that way to explore that end.
It is not possible to ride that far now. Thanks, Cindy Easton --
CE
Virus-free. www.avg.com
From:
To: Robert Reber; [email protected]
Cc: Joni Hiramoto
Subject: Please have equestrian staging at the new Frankkin Canyon Fernandez Ranch park Date: Thursday, September 2, 2021 8:50:38 AM
My horses are boarded in Orinda and I trailer weekly around the east bay.
Staging at Briones for example.
Please provide staging at Fernandez as well so that I can access this new park.
Sent from my "dumb" phone
From: Webmaster
To: Robert Reber
Subject: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 1:03:16 PM
Message submitted from the <Hercules, CA> website.
Site Visitor Name: David Hammond
Site Visitor Email:
Robert I am a supporter of JMLT and the repurposing of Franklin Canyon and especially the open space component of the plan. Fernandez Ranch and Franklin Canyon are both popular mountain biking locations and this plan will further their popularity and enjoyment. Dave Hammond 10 Year Land Committee Member of Save Mt Diablo and a vocal Open Space Advocate.
From:
To: Robert Reber
Subject: Franklin Canyon Golf Course
Date: Sunday, June 13, 2021 7:43:48 AM
My wife lived in Hercules for many years and is very fond of the city as am I. We also play golf and played again yesterday after a few years away from the sport. The environmental impact of the water in particular has been weighing on me. 50M gallons of water needed for Franklin Canyon and if you read the Yelp reviews many golfers are complaining about the condition of the course. “Need to get water back into the water hazards”. Completely out of touch with the realities of the semi- arid climate in California. I was running the numbers in my head of economics of the course and wondering how it could possibly survive the combination of increased water expenses, increased labor expenses, and decreasing interest in golf. I think the RV park concept makes a lot of sense for the community. Tent cabins and mountain bike trails would be amazing and that’s just a small part of the project. I’m sure this is not easy to manage and I wanted to send a quick note that even for someone that loves golf, we need to do what’s best for the environment and the overall return for the community.
Hopefully anyone working for the course now will be offered employment in this new RV park.
Sean McMurray
Founder/CEO
Watch ALVA Goes Bowling!
https://vimeo.com/236319157
www.alvalight.com
155 Mason Circle
Concord CA 94520
phone (925) 685-9301
fax (925) 685-0266
www.contracostamosquito.com
Protecting Public Health Since 1927
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
President PEGGIE HOWELL Clayton Vice President PETER PAY San Ramon Secretary DANIEL PELLEGRINI Martinez Antioch LOLA ODUNLAMI Brentwood Vacant Concord PERRY CARLSTON Contra Costa County JIM PINCKNEY CHRIS COWEN & DARRYL YOUNG Danville RANDALL DIAMOND El Cerrito THOMAS MINTER Hercules DUYLINH NGUYEN Lafayette JAMES FITZSIMMONS Moraga Vacant Oakley MICHAEL KRIEG Orinda KEVIN MARKER Pinole WARREN CLAYTON Pittsburg RICHARD AINSLEY PhD Pleasant Hill JENNIFER HOGAN Richmond SHIVA MISHEK San Pablo Vacant Walnut Creek JAMES MURRAY
April 28, 2021
Robert Reber
City of Hercules
111 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547
Re: Franklin Canyon RV Resort
Dear Mr. Reber,
Thank you for the opportunity to express the position of the Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control District (the District) regarding the proposed conversion of the Franklin Canyon Golf Course into a RV resort and campground.
As a bit of background, the District is tasked with reducing the risk of diseases spread by vectors in Contra Costa County by controlling them in a responsible, environmentally-conscious manner. A “vector” means any animal capable of transmitting the causative agent of human disease or capable of producing human discomfort or injury, including, but not limited to, mosquitoes, flies, mites, ticks, other arthropods, and rodents and other vertebrates. Under the California Health and Safety Code, property owners retain the responsibility to ensure that the structure(s), device(s), other project elements, and all additional facets of their property do not produce or harbor vectors, or otherwise create a nuisance.
Owners are required to take measures to abate any nuisance caused by activities undertaken and/or by the structure(s), device(s), or other feature(s) on their property. Failure by the owner(s) to adequately address a nuisance may lead to abatement by the Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector Control District and civil penalties up to $1,000 per day pursuant to California Health and Safety Code §2060 et seq.
All mosquitoes require water to complete their life cycle. Projects that construct impervious surface, alter water flow or drainage, introduce irrigation, contain water conveyance or treatment elements, etc. have the potential to produce standing water and vector breeding habitat, creating a potential health hazard for area citizens, pets, and wildlife. Vector species that may breed in such locales have the ability to not only affect nearby individuals, but potentially spread disease viruses to persons and other animals several miles away. This project has multiple features—stormwater collection and conveyance structures, bioretention basins, RV wash station, etc.— that can become high-volume mosquito production sites. These sites can not only require significant District resources, but put the health of local citizens at risk. Careful considerations for design and construction should be employed for all facets of the project in order to prevent creating suitable vector habitat. No feature of the project should create areas of stagnant water that exist in excess of 72 hours. A thorough operation and maintenance plan should include steps to preclude vector production and contingencies to remedy such issues if they arise. Bioretention basins, along with any other potential mosquito production sources, should be readily accessible by our field staff for inspection and control efforts, if necessary.
Sites abutting open or green space encounter a greater number of encounters with wildlife, including skunks. As skunks are a primary vector of rabies virus in California, efforts should be taken to prevent their access to gathering spaces to reduce the risk of encounters and potential virus transmission. Any fences bordering such space should be constructed of solid, gapless materials (e.g. wood or concrete) or incorporate ½-inch hardware cloth (e.g. slatted fence with attached hardware cloth) from ground level to two feet in height, paired with footings of similar material running the length of the fence to a depth of 12 inches.
Additionally, efforts should be made to keep the grounds, office, storage areas, trash enclosure, etc. from becoming attractive harborage for rodents. Trash enclosures should have sealed containers and be kept clean. Thorough exclusion work on structures, paired with eradicating available food and water sources, should reduce the attractiveness of the site to these animals, thus limiting potential for diseases spread by rodents and rodent-associated vectors.
Addressing these concerns in the project planning phases can not only better protect public health and reduce the need for vector control efforts, but avoid costly retrofits and fines for property owners in the future. Please don’t hesitate to contact the District should you have any questions or need anything further.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Shannon
Vector Control Planner
925-771-6119
[email protected]
From: Chris Kelley
To: Robert Reber; Steve Falk; Mike Roberts; Lori Martin; [email protected] Subject: Fw: Proposed RV park in Franklin Canyon
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 7:05:23 AM
FYI.
Chris
From:
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:21 PM
To: Chris Kelley <[email protected]>; Dion Bailey <[email protected]>; awalker- [email protected] <[email protected]>; Dan Romero <[email protected]>; Tiffany Grimsley <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed RV park in Franklin Canyon
Dear Mayor Kelley and Members of the City Council,
I had the privilege of serving on the Hercules Planning Commission for fourteen years. During that time I participated in the approval process for much of the development that has been built west of San Pablo Avenue. Many elements in those communities are unique and celebrated examples of urban design that could only have been achieved because the City Council, Planning Commission, City staff and Community shared a vision that demanded excellence from land developers.
I'm writing to respectfully express my strong concerns about the current proposal to close the Franklin Canyon Golf Course and replace it with a recreational vehicle park/resort and storage facility. In my opinion this proposal falls far short of the tradition of excellence in land planning and development that defines Hercules today.
During a recent driving tour around southern Utah I had the opportunity to observe several "RV Resorts". Beyond their manicured entrances these facilities are not attractive or appealing, especially to anyone outside of the RV community. These establishments provide power connections, laundromats, a sewage dumping station and other facilities and services needed by people who are living or traveling on the road. Such a facility would offer little or no value to the Hercules community.
RV parks are
usually located on highways near major attractions such as national and state wilderness parks, amusement parks, casinos, or retail outlet centers. The proposed Franklin Canyon site is not close enough to San Francisco, the wine country, Carmel, Lake Tahoe or any other regional attraction to justify use of this location as a staging area. Lacking close proximity to major attractions, the proposed RV "resort" could eventually become a typical mobile home/trailer park. RV storage, also included in the proposal, is a "light industrial" use that should not be permitted under any circumstances. Vehicle storage is a very low value land use that does not require a choice location or generate jobs or revenue.
This RV Park proposal completely abandons the upscale destination that was promised when the Council voted to permit bifurcation
of the site many years ago. At that time the
owner/developer claimed that the golf course was going to be extensively redesigned and
upgraded by a nationally known operator and the project was going to include a luxury hotel, restaurants, a variety of sports facilities and shopping. If that vision was a bit too ambitious, the current proposal is far too modest and unimaginative.
Certainly, interest in Recreational Vehicles is enjoying temporary growth concurrent with retirement of the "baby boom generation" and as a reaction to the Covid outbreak, however; this trend may be short lived as people are already returning to pre-Covid travel patterns.
Based upon recent articles that cover the subject, much of the current demand for RV, travel trailer, "tiny house", and tent accommodations
is driven by a growing interest in
"alternative/affordable" non code compliant permanent housing rather than a demand for space to park luxury mobile units ($200,000+) depicted in the developer's video.
The developer suggests that the project will generate significant occupancy tax revenue for the city. Please consider requesting that the proposed financial model be evaluated by a third party (to be identified and hired by the City and paid for by the developer). Developer estimates of occupancy rates and revenue may be significantly overstated. Moreover, what safeguards are in place to prevent
sale of the property to an organization that has a different vision for the facility? Given the housing crisis that has driven the state legislature to take extreme measures to increase sheltering capacity, the project may be vulnerable to a change at the state level that could arbitrarily convert the site from transient into permanent "alternative" housing.
Finally, the video prepared for the
project offers a confusing picture because it shows scenes of an upgraded Franklin Canyon Golf Course juxtaposed with images of RV resorts in Florida or Southern California under canopies of Palms. The viewer is then taken on a photo tour of San Francisco and the wine country rather than being shown specifics pertaining to the proposal itself. The video includes a glance at an overhead layout and an elevation ( drawing) of the proposed new 'clubhouse'. It mentions a "Spa" , restaurant and other amenities but without specifics. I respectfully suggest that more information is needed before an informed decision can be made about this proposal.
I hope that you will carefully consider these issues and seriously question why this particular project is proposed for such an attractive, unique and popular site. Franklin Canyon has operated successfully as an affordable place to learn and play golf for many years. This existing amenity could be improved and made more attractive and accessible to Hercules residents. It is difficult to imagine how an RV, travel trailer, tent camp and RV storage facility can complement the site or benefit the community in any meaningful way.
Sincerely,
Richard H. Mitchell
Hercules resident since 1985
Retired