Hercules City Council
December 13, 2022

Tuesday, December 13, 2022
7:00 PM
City of Hercules
111 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547
City Council
Mayor Dion Bailey
Vice Mayor Alexander Walker-Griffin
Council Member Dan Romero
Council Member Chris Kelley
Council Member Tiffany Grimsley
Dante Hall, City Manager
Patrick Tang, City Attorney
Lauren Berges, City Clerk
Meeting Agenda
In person in Council Chambers or
Zoom ID: 856 3161 6879
Zoom Passcode: 223611
Zoom Phone number: 1-669-900-6833
1 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda
See last pages of agenda for information regarding meeting procedures To view webcast of meetings, live or on demand, go to the City's website at www.ci.hercules.ca.us I. SPECIAL MEETING - CLOSED SESSION – NONE
II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
III. CONVENE INTO CLOSED SESSION
The Hercules City Council will meet in Closed Session regarding the following:

IV. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL V. REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
VII. MOMENT OF SILENCE
VIII. INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS/COMMISSION REPORTS
IX. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
X. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This time is reserved for members of the public to address issues not included in the agenda. In accordance with the Brown Act, Council will refer to staff any matters brought before them at this time, and those matters may be placed on a future agenda.

All public comments are allowed up to 3 minutes to relay their message or concern. A limit of 30 minutes will be devoted to taking public comment at this point in the agenda. If any speakers remain at the conclusion of the initial 30 minute period, time will be reserved at the conclusion of the meeting to take the remaining comments.

Individuals wishing to address the City Council are asked to complete a form indicating the name and address of the speaker and the general topic to be addressed. Speakers must make their comments from the podium and will be allowed 3 minutes to discuss their concerns. The public may log into the Zoom meeting (refer to agenda cover for Zoom login information) and provide their public comment (3 minute time limit). All public comments are recorded and become part of the public record.

XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE

2 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda
XII. CONSENT CALENDAR

1. 22-373 Emergency Declaration
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing virtual city council, commission and committee meetings during a declared state of emergency pursuant to government code 54953 (AB 361).

Staff Report AB 361
Attach 1 - AB 361 Resolution
Attachments:

2. 22-372 Meeting Minutes of November 9, 2022
Meeting Minutes for November 9, 2022Attachments:

3. 22-342 FY 2022-23 First Quarter Budget Report
Recommendation: Receive the report on the FY 2022-23 first quarter budget report.

FY 22-23 1st Quarter Revenue and Expenditure Report_SR
Attach 1 - General Fund Year-to-date Revenue Report through September 30, 2022 Attach 2 - General Fund Year-to-date Expenditure Report through September 30, 2022 Attach 3 - All Funds Year-to-date Revenues and Expenditures Report through September 30, 2022 Attach 4 - Active Capital Projects through September 30, 2022 Attachments:

4. 22-370 Declaring Results of the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution declaring the results of the General Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022.

Staff Report - Election Results 121322
Attach 1 - Resolution
Exhibit A - Certificate of Election_SummaryReport_Final Attach 2 - Measure N Ordinance Text
Attachments:

5. 22-374 Annual Local Commission Appointment List
Recommendation: Review and receive the Annual Local Commission Appointment List commonly referred to as the Maddy Act.

Staff Report - Maddy Act 121322
Attach 1 - 2022 Maddy Act - revised 12.13.22
Attachments:

3 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda
XIII. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS

1. 22-371 Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement - Adjustment of Republic Services’ Rate +3.52% effective January 1, 2023 Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving Republic Services’ base year rate adjustment of +3.52% effective January 1, 2023 per the recommended order issued by the Public Works Director.

Staff Report - Solid Waste R3 12-01-2022
Resolution - Solid Waste Rate Adjustment
Att 1 - Report and Recommended Order for Republic Rate Increase Att 2 - 11092022 Staff Report - Solid Waste Rate Adjustment Attachments:

2. 22-383 Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers in the amount of $284,000 for Engineering Support Services during Construction for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Carollo Engineers for a not to exceed amount of $284,000 for Engineering Support Services during construction for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Staff Report-Carollo Engineering Support Services
Attach 1 - Resolution Carollo Engineer Support Services Proposal for Sycamore Ave Trunk Sewer Replacment ESDC_rev Attachments:

3. 22-384 Award of a Construction Contract to Cratus for the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Cratus Inc. in the amount of $11,615,866 for the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant, authorizing an additional expenditure of up to $1,161,587 for a 10% contingency on said construction contract, for a total not to exceed contract amount of $12,777,453.

Staff Report - Sycmoare Sewer Trunk Construction
Attach 1 - Resolution Sycamore Sewer Trunk Construction Contract Location Map - Sycamore Ave Trunk Sewer Replacement Project Attachments:

4 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda
XIV. CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

1. 22-379 Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin to Present a Proclamation to Mayor Bailey D. Bailey - Mayor 2022 ProclamationAttachments:

2. 22-380 Remarks from Mayor Bailey
XV. OATHS OF OFFICE & INSTALLATION OF RE-ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS

1. 22-376 Administer Oath of Office to Re-Elected Council Members Dion Bailey and Chris Kelley.

Cert of Election Form - D. Bailey
Cert of Election Form - C. Kelley
Attachments:

2. 22-381 Remarks from Council Members
XVI. RECESS AND REFRESHMENTS
XVII. RECONVENE - CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL
XVIII. CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION

1. 22-375 Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor
Recommendation: City Council to nominate and appoint a Mayor and Vice Mayor for 2023.

Staff Report - Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor
Attach 1 - Council Rules of Procedure - Amended by Res No. 18-017 041018 Attachments:

2. 22-385 Administer Oath of Office to Newly Appointed Mayor

3. 22-382 Remarks from Newly Appointed Mayor and Vice Mayor XIX. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS

1. 22-378 City Council Regular Meeting Dates for the 2023 Calendar Year Recommendation: Review the schedule of City Council regular meeting dates in 2023 and consider canceling one or more regular meetings in August and the November 28th and December 26th regular meetings.

Staff Report - Meeting Schedule 2023
Attach 1 - 2023 Meeting Calendar (2023 Jan - Dec)
Attachments:

5 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda

2. 22-377 2023 Council Appointments on Regional Committees and Council Subcommittees
Recommendation: Express interest and availability for the 2023 Council Appointments on Regional Committees and Council Subcommittees to be made by the Mayor at the January 10, 2023 City Council meeting.

Staff Report - Council Appointments to Regional Committees Attach 1 - 2022 CC Appointed Reps - Approved 01.11.2022 Attachments:

XX. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This time is reserved for members of the public who were unavailable to attend the Public Communications period during Section X of the meeting, or were unable to speak due to lack of time. The public speaker requirements specified in Section X of this Agenda apply to this Section.

XXI. CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENTS,

COMMITTEE, SUB-COMMITTEE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE REPORTS

AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This is the time for brief announcements on issues of interest to the community. In accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, matters which do not appear on this agenda but require City Council discussion may be either (a) referred to staff or other resources for factual information or (b) placed on a future meeting agenda.

XXII. ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 7:00p.m. in the Council Chambers.

Agendas are posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) or Section 54956.

Members of the public can view electronic agendas and staff reports by accessing the City website at www.ci.hercules.ca.us and can receive e-mail notification of agenda and staff report postings by signing up to receive an enotice from the City’s homepage. Agendas and staff reports may also be obtained by contacting the Administrative Services Department at (510) 799-8215 (Posted: December 8, 2022)

6 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda

INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE AND WATCH THE HERCULES CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING

COMMISSION HYBRID MEETINGS
Attend in Person: Hercules City Council Chambers – 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA 94547 Attend via Zoom Teleconference: Details provided below and zoom webinar login, passcode and phone numbers provided on the agenda cover.

Please note: Updated COVID-19 safety protocols will be posted outside the City Council Chambers. Please review this information before entering the Council Chambers.

How to Submit Public Comments
In Person: Attend meeting at the Hercules City Council Chambers, fill out a public speaker card located on the side table and submit it to the City Clerk.

Via Zoom: Members of the public may submit a live remote public comment via Zoom video conferencing.

Download the Zoom mobile app from the Apple Appstore or Google Play. If you are using a desktop computer, you can test your connection to Zoom by clicking here or go to: https://www.zoom.us/join. Zoom also allows you to join by phone at +1-669-900-6833 or +1-929-205-6099 or +1-253-215-8782. • Speakers will be asked to provide their name and city of residence, although providing this information is not required for participation.
• Each speaker will be allowed up to 3 minutes to speak and provide comment. A limit of 30 minutes will be devoted to taking public comment during the first public comment period on the agenda. If any speaker comments have not been accommodated prior to the initial 30 minute period, time will be reserved at the conclusion of the meeting for the remaining public comments. • Speakers will be muted until their opportunity to provide public comment.

When the Mayor opens the comment period for the item you wish to speak on, please use the “raise hand” feature (or press *9 if connecting via telephone) which will alert staff that you have a comment to provide and press *6 to unmute.

Written Comments Submitted Electronically: All comments received before 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided to the City Council prior to the meeting and posted to the City’s agenda website and located by clicking on the “meeting details” tab. Written comments received after 3:00 p.m. will be provided to City Council and posted to the agenda website the following day. Written comments will not be read aloud during the meeting. Email comments to [email protected]. Please indicate which item on the agenda you are commenting on in the subject line of your email.

Written comments submitted in person or via mail: Additional ways to provide your public comment is to either drop off your comment in person to the front desk receptionist located in the City Hall lobby or to mail your comment to City of Hercules, ATTN: City Clerk – Public Comment (Meeting Date), 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA 94547 in time to reach the City Clerk no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting or you can submit your comment by telephone by calling (510) 799-8215 no later than 3:00 p.m. on the meeting date.

If you need assistance with public comment, please contact: Lauren Berges, City Clerk at [email protected] or by calling (510) 799-8215.

All public comments will become part of the official meeting record. The City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the website will not be uninterrupted. To ensure that the City Council receives your written comments, you are strongly encouraged to submit your comments in writing in advance of the meeting by 3:00 p.m. on the day of the Council or Commission meeting.

7 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda

OTHER WAYS TO WATCH THE MEETING
Live on Channel 28: City Council meetings will replay the following Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and Saturday at 1:00 p.m.

Planning Commission meetings will replay the following Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. and Saturday at 9:00 a.m.

Video Streamed Live on the City’s Website:

To view City Council and Planning Commission meeting videos online go to: Hercules Meeting Videos.

Instructions to view Live or On-Demand Videos from the City’s website:

1. Go to: Hercules Meeting Videos or https://hercules.legistar.com/calendar.aspx.

2. Locate the desired meeting and date.

3. Click the associated “Video” link (Video status is as follows):

Video = Video is available for on demand viewing.

In Progress = Video is available for viewing during live recording.

Not Available = Video is either unavailable or has not been recorded.

8 December 13, 2022City Council Meeting Agenda

THE HERCULES CITY COUNCIL ADHERES TO THE FOLLOWING POLICIES,

PROCEDURES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

1. SPECIAL ACCOMODATIONS: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special accommodations to participate at a City Council meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 510-799-8215 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

2. AGENDA ITEMS: Persons wishing to add an item to an agenda must submit the final written documentation 12 calendar days prior to the meeting. The City retains the discretion whether to add items to the agenda. Persons wishing to address the City Council otherwise may make comments during the Public Communication period of the meeting.

3. AGENDA POSTING: Agendas of regular City Council meetings are posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall, the Hercules Swim Center, Ohlone Child Care Center, Hercules Post Office, and on the City’s website (www.ci.hercules.ca.us),

4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: Persons who wish to address the City Council should complete the speaker form prior to the Council's consideration of the item on the agenda.

Anyone who wishes to address the Council on a topic that is not on the agenda and is relevant to the Council should complete the speaker form prior to the start of the meeting. Speakers will be called upon during the Public Communication portion of the meeting. In accordance with the Brown Act, the City Council may not take action on items not listed on the agenda. The Council may refer to staff any matters brought before them at this time and those matters may be placed on a future agenda.

In the interests of conducting an orderly and efficient meeting, speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes.

Anyone may also submit written comments at any time before or during the meeting.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Council or a member of the public prior to the time the City Council votes on the motion to adopt.

6. LEGAL CHALLENGES: If you challenge a decision of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the meeting or in written correspondence delivered at, or prior to, the meeting. Actions challenging City Council decisions shall be subject to the time limitations contained in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.

9 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Lauren Berges, City Clerk

SUBJECT: Emergency Declaration Extension

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a resolution authorizing virtual city council, commission and committee meetings during a declared state of emergency pursuant to government code 54953 (AB 361)

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION: There are no direct financial impacts from enactment of the proposed resolution.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

When the COVID-19 pandemic started, local agencies struggled to conduct their public meetings in compliance with the Brown Act’s public accessibility requirements while still abiding by stay- at-home orders. As a result, Governor Newsom signed Orders N-25-20, N-29-20, and N-35-20 to grant local agencies the flexibility to meet remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. These orders expired on September 30, 2021.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law AB 361 – Brown Act: Remote Meetings During Emergencies. AB 361 went into effect immediately upon signature by the governor. It amends the Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to continue having purely virtual meetings using teleconferencing and virtual meeting technology as long as there is a gubernatorial "proclaimed state of emergency," and either (1) state or local officials imposing or recommending measures that promote social distancing or (2) the legislative body finding that meeting in person would present an imminent safety risk to attendees.

There are key differences between the Executive Orders, which expired September 30, 2021, and AB 361. AB 361 imposes requirements with respect to public comment, however, the City of Hercules currently satisfies legal requirements with respect to live public comment via Zoom in alignment with AB 361. Additionally, public agencies must either make findings by majority vote that the state of emergency still exists and continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person, or that health officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. These conditions continue to exist. Determinations by 10 the local agency that the emergency impacts the ability to meet safely in person must be re- visited every 30 days.

Governor Newsom’s March 4, 2020 Proclamation of Emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is still in effect. In addition, the Contra Costa County Public Health Officer continues to recommend teleconferencing or social distancing to protect the public’s health and safety during local government meetings.

Continuing the remote meetings would provide for a consistent meeting format until the pandemic emergency is lifted.

DISCUSSION:

AB 361 amends Government Code Section 54953 to provide an alternative to having the public access the locations where City Councilmembers, Commissioner, or Committee Members, are teleconferencing in from. To have teleconference public meetings, without providing access to City Councilmember’s private residences, the City Council must pass a resolution stating that they have reconsidered the circumstances of the COVID-19 state of emergency and that any of the following circumstances exist:

1. The state of emergency as a result of COVID-19 continues to directly impact the ability of the members of City Council and the members of the City’s Commissions, and Committees to meet safely in person; and

2. The State of California and the City of Hercules continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.

This Resolution makes the findings to confirm the current conditions to allow teleconference meetings pursuant to AB 361 for the City Council and on behalf of all of the commissions and committees created by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b). The Resolution authorizes teleconference meetings including hybrid meetings held both via teleconference and in-person. This Resolution will allow members of the public to safely observe and participate in local government teleconference meetings during the continued pandemic.

AB 361 requires City Council to make these findings every 30 days to continue teleconference hearings. If adopted, staff will agendize this item once a month until the state of emergency is over, or City Council no longer believes teleconference meetings are necessary.

If the Resolution is not adopted, the City will be required to hold public meetings in-person or conduct teleconference meetings pursuant to subsection 54953(b)(3) of the California Government Code which will require posting of the agenda at each teleconference location and for the public to be admitted to each teleconference location.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

11 HERCULES CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERCULES

AUTHORIZING VIRTUAL CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AND COMMITTEE

MEETINGS DURING A DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953 (AB 361)

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hercules is committed to ensuring public access to observe and participate in local government meetings; and

WHEREAS, all meetings of the City Council and its other legislative bodies created pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b) are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, so that any member of the public may participate in local government meetings; and

WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Governor signed Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Brown Act in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings by teleconference or by other means; and

WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21 which ended the provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 on September 30, 2021; and

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361 (2021) into law allowing legislative bodies to continue to conduct meetings via teleconferencing under specified conditions, including the requirement that the legislative body make specified findings. AB 361 (2021) took effect on October 1, 2021; and

WHEREAS, AB 361 authorizes local legislative bodies to continue using teleconferencing and virtual meeting technology as long as there is a gubernatorial "proclaimed state of emergency," and either (1) State or local officials imposing or recommending measures that promote social distancing or (2) the legislative body finding that meeting in person would present an imminent safety risk to attendees; and

WHEREAS, the state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, related to the pandemic of coronavirus commonly as COVID-19 has not been rescinded and remains in effect; and

WHEREAS, new variants of COVID-19 have developed, and risks of illness or death due to such variants remains significant to the general public; and

WHEREAS, State and local health officials have imposed and recommended social distancing measures for the protection of public health and safety in response to COVID-19; and

WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Health Services Officer continues to recommend teleconferencing or social distancing during public meetings of all legislative bodies to protect the community’s health against the spread of COVID-19; and

WHEREAS, teleconference meetings may include hybrid meetings, in which all or some members of the legislative body meet in person while others attend by teleconference, and members of the public are either allowed to participate only by teleconference or both in person 12 and by teleconference (“hybrid meetings”). The purpose of hybrid meetings is to allow for multiple modes of attending meetings while reducing the risks of COVID-19, including its variants; and

WHEREAS, the City Council, acting as a legislative body pursuant to Government Code section 54952(a) and for the benefit of the commissions, committees, and other bodies that were created by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b) (collectively referred to as “Legislative Bodies”), finds that the current conditions meet the circumstances set forth in Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to allow Legislative Bodies to continue to use teleconferencing to hold open and public meetings if the Legislative Bodies comply with the requirements set forth in Government Code section 54953(e)(2) to ensure the public can safely participate in and observe local government meetings.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules that:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Current Conditions Authorize Teleconference Public Meetings of Legislative Bodies.

Based on the California Governor’s continued declaration of a State of Emergency and the Contra Costa County Health Services Officer’s recommendation to continue teleconferencing or social distancing during public meetings, the City Council finds that the conditions continue to exist pursuant to Government Code sections 54952(e)(1) and 54953(e)(3) to allow Legislative Bodies to use teleconferencing to hold public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(2) to ensure members of the public have continued access to safely observe and participate in local government meetings.

Section 3. Authorize Legislative Bodies to Conduct Teleconference Meetings. The Legislative Bodies are hereby authorized to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(2) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately and shall be in effect for a period of 30 days from the date of adoption. The City Council may reconsider the circumstances necessitating this resolution within 30 days of the adoption of this resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the 13th day of December, 2022 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

____________________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Lauren Berges, City Clerk
13 3

14 111 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547City of Hercules
Meeting Minutes
City Council
Mayor Dion Bailey
Vice Mayor Alexander Walker-Griffin
Council Member Dan Romero
Council Member Chris Kelley
Council Member Tiffany Grimsley
Dante Hall, City Manager
Patrick Tang, City Attorney
Lauren Berges, City Clerk
5:30 PMWednesday, November 9, 2022
SPECIAL MEETING In-person in Council Chambers or
Zoom ID:881 6006 4242
Zoom Phone Number: 1-669-444-9171
Zoom Passcode: 461565
To view webcast of meetings, live or on demand, go to the City's website at www.ci.hercules.ca.us I. SPECIAL MEETING - 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley

Present: 4 -
Council Member T. GrimsleyAbsent: 1 -
II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - SPECIAL MEETING ITEMS
None.

III. COMMISSION INTERVIEWS
22-3481. Commission Interviews
Recommendation: Conduct interviews for eligible candidates which have applied for Hercules Commissions and Committees.

Councilmembers conducted interviews for candidates for Finance Commission, Planning Commission, County Library Commission representative, and the Parks and Recreation Steering Committee.

IV. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley

Present: 4 -
Council Member T. GrimsleyAbsent: 1 -

15 November 9, 2022City Council Meeting Minutes
V. REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION - NONE
VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin.

VII. MOMENT OF SILENCE
Mayor Bailey requested a moment of silence for former Hercules Police Department employee Cheryl Rinker and Hercules resident Micah Stewart-Speight, who both recently passed away.

VIII. INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS/COMMISSION REPORTS

1. 22-340
Vietnam Memorial Anniversary Proclamation
Mayor Bailey read the proclamation aloud. Councilmembers provided comment.

IX. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
City Manager Dante Hall had no additions or deletions to the agenda.

X. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
None.

XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

XII. CONSENT CALENDAR

1. 22-344 Meeting Minutes of October 25, 2022
Approved.

2. 22-338 Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2022
Recommendation: Accept the investment report for the quarter ending September 30, 2022
Approved.

3. 22-341
Emergency Declaration
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing virtual city council, commission and committee meetings during a declared state of emergency pursuant to government code 54953 (AB 361).

Approved.

16 November 9, 2022City Council Meeting Minutes
XIII. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS

1. 22-347 Commission and Committee Appointments
Recommendation: Review all eligible candidates which have applied for Hercules Boards and Commissions. City Council will make their selection and appointments directly following the special meeting interview process.

Mayor Bailey introduced the item. The City Councilmembers announced their selection of candidates to fill the vacancies on the City's Boards and Commissions. The following candidates received the highest number of votes and were appointed to the City's Boards and Commissions as follows:

Finance Commission
Barinder Dhillon-Flanagan - 2 year term ending 12/31/2024 Ed Ulle - 2 year term ending 12/31/2024
Planning Commission
Ken Morrison - 2 year term ending 12/31/2024
Carol Most-Walker - 2 year term ending 12/31/2024
Dilli Bhattarai - 2 year term ending 12/31/2024
Parks and Recreation Steering Committee (Limited Term)
Tyler Darke
Ricky Delos Reyes
Bob Redlow
County Library Commission Seat
Councilmember Romero motions to appoint Jo Ellen Marcotte to the County Library Seat, Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin seconds; D. Romero, C.

Kelley, Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey Ayes. T. Grimsley absent. Motion passes.

Councilmembers returned to this item to reappoint the following members:

Councilmember Romero motions to reappoint Jennifer Doran to the Contra Costa Advisory Council on Aging, Councilmember Kelley seconds; D.

Romero, C. Kelley, Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey Ayes. T.

Grimsley absent. Motion passes.

Councilmember Kelley motions to reappoint Han Chen, D. Yamamoto, and Brian Campbell-Miller to the Community and Library Services Commission, Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin seconds; D. Romero, C. Kelley, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey Ayes. T. Grimsley absent.

Motion passes.

17 November 9, 2022City Council Meeting Minutes

2. 22-337 Memorandum Of Understanding with Participating Contra Costa Agencies to Complete a Feasibility Study for Expanded Ferry Service including the Hercules Hub at a Participating Cost of $40,000 in Measure J Funding
Recommendation: Approve a Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) with the Cities of Antioch, Martinez, and Pittsburg, Contra Costa County, Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority, and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority to advance planning and studies to evaluate the feasibility of expanded ferry service in Contra Costa County including the Hercules Hub at a participating cost of $40,000 in Measure J Funding.

Presentation by Director of Public Works Mike Roberts and Peter Engel of CCTA. Councilmembers provided comment. No public comment.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Romero, seconded by Council Member Kelley, to adopt Resolution 2022-094. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: Council Member T. Grimsley1 -

3. 22-339
Agreement with the John Muir Land Trust for the Evaluation of the Refugio Creek Conservation Easement and Appropriation of $50K in Public Benefit Fees to fund Related Activities
Recommendation: The City Council approve an agreement for the John Muir Land Trust (JMLT) to undertake evaluation activities prior to accepting the transfer of the Refugio Creek Conservation Easement and associated Mitigation Obligation for the Hercules Hub; and, appropriate $50K in Public Benefit Fees to fund said activities.

Presentation by Director of Public Works Mike Roberts and Becky Rozumowics-Kodsuntie of Area West Environmental Inc. Councilmembers provided comment. No public comment.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kelley, seconded by Vice Mayor Walker-Griffin, to adopt Resolution 2022-095. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: Council Member T. Grimsley1 -

4. 22-345
Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement - Preliminary Recommendation to Adjust Republic Services Rate +3.52% for 2023 Recommendation: Receive the Public Works Director’s report and

18 November 9, 2022City Council Meeting Minutes
recommended order following his November 8, 2022 Public Hearing regarding Republic Services’ preliminary recommended base year rate adjustment of +3.52% effective January 1, 2023.

Presentation by Director of Public Works Mike Roberts and Garth Schultz of R3 Consulting Group. Councilmembers provided comment. No public comment.

No action, report only.

5. 22-343
Pipeline Agreement with Union Pacific including a $174,600 License Fee for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project Recommendation: Approve a Crossing and Longitudinal Pipeline Agreement with Union Pacific (UP) including a $174,600 license fee for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Replacement Project and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City Council.

Presentation by Director of Public Works Mike Roberts. Councilmembers provided comment. Anne Prudhel of Corollo Engineers provided comment.

No public comment.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Romero, seconded by Council Member Kelley, to adopt Resolution 2022-096. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member D. Romero, Vice Mayor A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Bailey, and Council Member C. Kelley
4 -

Absent: Council Member T. Grimsley1 -
XIV. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
No public comment.

XV. CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENTS,

COMMITTEE, SUB-COMMITTEE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE REPORTS

AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
City Manager Hall announced that City Hall will be closed tomorrow in recognition of Veteran's Day. Councilmembers reported out on local and regional meetings and events.

This is the time for brief announcements on issues of interest to the community. In accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, matters which do not appear on this agenda but require City Council discussion may be either (a) referred to staff or other resources for factual information or (b) placed on a future meeting agenda.

19 November 9, 2022City Council Meeting Minutes
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Bailey adjourned the meeting at 8:22 p.m.
_________________________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
Lauren Berges, CMC
City Clerk

20 1

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Special Meeting of November 9, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Edwin Gato, Director of Finance

SUBJECT: FY 22-23 1st Quarter Budget Report and Preliminary Final FY 21-22 General Fund Annual Operating Results

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive the reports on the FY 22-23 1st Quarter Budget Report for the period ending September 30, 2022, and the Preliminary FY 21-22 General Fund Preliminary Annual Results (Unaudited).

COMMISSION/SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:

This report will be presented to the Finance Commission on their regular meeting on November 16, 2021.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

The FY 22-23 1st quarter report includes information detailing the variances between budgets and actual for revenues, and expenditures, and the Preliminary FY 21-22 General Fund Annual Results (Unaudited).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Quarterly financial reporting is being prepared by the City staff as a means of providing the community, Council, and the organization with an overview of financial information for the General Government Funds. The primary information provided in the quarterly report is a comparison of the annual budget amounts to actual revenues and expenditures for operating departments. All financial information is based on preliminary, unaudited information reported from the municipal financial system as of the report date. Seasonal variations or special occurrences in municipal operations may affect the proportion of revenues achieved or expenditures incurred to date.

DISCUSSION:

FY 21-22 General Fund Preliminary Year End Results
This report was prepared without the final audit results and is subject to change depending upon the results of the audit in progress. The audit will not be completed until December at the earliest.

The following is the preliminary unaudited summary of the year-end annual budget results as of June 30, 2022:
21 2

Preliminarily, the FY 21-22, revenues were higher than anticipated, and expenditures were lower than expected. As a result, the net General Fund ended the year with a positive $3.9 million available cash balance, $2.9 million better than the projected FY 21-22 Budget.

The City Council amended the financial policy that the General Fund surplus or available cash balance will be allocated as follows:
 25% to Pension (Section 115 Trust).
 25% to operating reserve until it reaches 25% of total operating expenses.  50% to fund unmet/deferred infrastructure and maintenance needs.

FY 22-23 1st Quarter Budget Report
This report summarizes the City’s financial performance for the three months ended September 30, 2022. Financial analysis for this report is provided for the General Fund, Capital Improvement Program, and combined information for other City funds on a cash basis. Cash basis means that revenues are recognized at the time revenues are received and expenditures are recognized at the time payment is processed.

The expenditure budgets include adjustments for encumbrances, carryovers and any supplemental appropriations made by the City Council as of September 30, 2022.

GENERAL FUND
The General Fund is the chief operating fund for the City and includes multiple programs that provide direct programs, activities, and services to the citizens of Hercules.

The Fiscal Year (FY) 22-23 annual budget for the General Fund projected revenues is $16.8 million.

As of September 30, 2022, the General Fund's actual revenues were $4 million, or 24% of the FY 22- 23 estimated revenues.

The FY 22-23 expenditure appropriations for the General Fund are $17.7 million. As of September 30, 2022, actual expenditures were $5.3 million, or 30% of the FY 21-22 budget. As is typical with the General Fund, the first quarter information is insufficient to make projections on how the fiscal year might track. The primary purpose of this report is to highlight what significant deviances, positive and negative, we have seen thus far in comparison to a typical first quarter to highlight areas that might require focus in the future.

Budget Actual Variance
Beginning Available Cash Balance $2,138,826 $2,138,826 $0 Revenues 16,901,000 19,826,712 2,925,712
Expenditures 18,104,239 18,056,516 (47,723)
Net Results (1,203,239) 1,770,196 2,973,435
Ending Available Cash Balance $935,587 $3,909,022 $2,973,435 22 3

General Fund Revenue Analysis

General Fund Revenues

About 83% of the General Fund revenues comes from taxes in the following categories:
 Utility Users Tax
 Sales Tax
 Property Taxes
 Vehicle License Fees (VLF)
 Business License Fees
 Document Transfer Tax
 Franchise Fees
 Transient Occupancy Tax

The City derives a significant portion of its General Fund revenues from economically sensitive sources such as property taxes, sales taxes (1% Bradley-Burns), and utility users’ taxes. When one or more of these key revenue sources deviate from projections, funding for future programs and services may be affected.

The Utility User’s Tax (UUT) is imposed by the City on the consumption of utility services, including (but not limited to) electricity, gas, water, sewer, telephone, sanitation, and cable television. The City determines the rate of the tax and the use of its revenues. As of September 30, 2022, $978,000 or 27% of the estimated revenues have been collected.

Taxes
83%
Program
Revenues
10%
Cost allocation
4%
Use of Money
& Property
2%
Transfers and
others
1%
23 4

Sales Taxes, the second-largest revenue source for the City’s General Fund, is remitted to the City from the State on an ongoing basis. Sales Tax revenues are significantly higher by 39% compared to the same quarter last year. This revenue source is highly concentrated within a few major operators.

The City’s property taxes are received between December and April. Therefore, there are no property taxes have been received to date. The City continually realizes a stable property tax-related revenue growth based on prior-year trends and this year’s report from the County Assessor’s Office.

General Fund - Expenditure Analysis
Operating expenses, by category and department, are tracked at approximately 30% of the annual budget through September 30, 2022. Expenditures on Worker’s Compensation and General Liability Insurance are paid in full at the beginning of the year. Overall, there is not enough information this early to determine if expenditures will deviate significantly from the budget due to the timing of spending. Staff will revisit this budget at mid-year or as of December 31 and prepare a Mid-Year Budget adjustment as necessary based on that analysis.

SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
The Enterprise Fund group consists of the City's Sewer Fund and requires proprietary fund balance reporting, including cash, reserves, fixed assets, and related long-term debt. Sufficient resources are maintained to ensure the completion of current projects and programs and to cover debt service. The Sewer Fund's net position on September 30, 2022, was $33 million.

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Actual revenues on September 30, 202 2, were $ 1.4 million, and actual expenditures were $ 1.6 million. The Special Revenue Funds are driven by grants or other specific funding sources used for specific purposes, such as transportation, building permit counter activity, other restricted programs, etc. Such funding sources are restricted in nature, which requires revenues and expenditures to be tracked differently from the City’s primary operating fund, the General Fund. There is sufficient funding for the completion of current projects or programs, but the addition of any new programs or projects is dependent on the availability of future funding sources.

CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
These funds derive their revenues from a combination of fees from new development, Gas Tax, and Regional Measure J, most of which generate revenues and expenditures in different patterns from the City’s other operating funds. Because these funds are budge ted multi -year, the project may experience some cost overruns. Typical reasons for these overruns include underestimating costs in initial project proposals and field changes required to complete a project but were unanticipated when the contract was awarded. To mitigate the risk of cost overruns, the Finance Department continues to work with the Departments to ensure processes are in place to prevent overspending, including providing project balances are kept up to date, and adequate contingencies are in place before the commencement of the project. The Capital Improvement Projects Funds had an aggregate expense of $47 million to date as illustrated in attachment 4. There is sufficient funding to complete the projects.

24 5

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
The Debt Service Funds group accounts for the long-term debt of the City. As of June 30, 2022, the unaudited fund balances of all debt service funds were $2.1 million. Sufficient funds are transferred from a variety of sources to meet debt service obligations as they come due. The funding source is dependent upon the purpose of the debt.

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
The Internal Service Funds group includes those funds created for the accumulation of reserves for vehicle replacement, technology and equipment replacement, and facility maintenance. Revenues for these funds is derived from administrative (cost recovery) charges to other funds, primarily the General Fund. The fund balance of the Internal Service Funds group was $1.4 million as of September 30, 2022.

FIDUCIARY FUNDS
The Fiduciary Funds group includes the assessment district bond that are not obligations of the City and a trust fund established for the Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB).

SUCCESSOR AGENCY
The Successor Agency is an entity separate from the City and accounted for in separate trust funds that are used to account for tax increment monies received and payments of items approved by the Oversight Board in the Required Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS). Governmental accounting standards require that the full amount of debt outstanding be recorded as part of these funds. The unaudited deficit balance as of June 30, 2022, was $42 million, which reflects bonded indebtedness to be paid from future Redevelopment Property Transfer Tax Fund (RPTTF) revenue.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. General Fund Year-To-date Revenue Report through September 30, 2022

2. General Fund Year-To-date Expenditure Report through September 30, 2022

3. All Funds Year-to-date Revenues and Expenditures Report through September 30, 2022

4. Active Capital Projects report through September 30, 2022

25 Description Budget
FY 22-23
1st Quarter % Collected
FY 21-22
1st Quarter
$ Change from
Prior Year
% Change from
Prior Year
Sales Tax 4,998,000 1,969,796 39% 949,327 1,020,469 107% Utility User Tax 3,589,000 978,187 27% 994,644 (16,457) -2% Vehicle License Fee (VLF) 2,463,000 - 0% - - Property Taxes 1,571,000 - 0% - - Franchise Fees 905,000 240,888 27% 117,512 123,376 105% Business Licenses 274,000 28,457 10% 35,241 (6,784) -19% Transfer Tax 146,000 31,993 22% 52,636 (20,643) -39% Transient Occupancy Tax 114,000 9,369 8% 3,764 5,605 149% Intergovernmental 48,000 2,947 6% 33,579 (30,632) -91% Fines & Forefeitures 38,000 12,356 33% 13,168 (812) -6% Program Revenues
Community Development 285,000 78,163 27% 59,592 18,571 31% Parks and Recreation 1,156,000 441,090 38% 216,703 224,387 104% Police 139,000 29,016 21% 27,764 1,252 5% Public Works 38,000 23,692 62% 3,929 19,763 503% Other 11,000 3,650 33% 2,333 1,317 56% Use of Money & Property 286,000 72,804 25% 56,660 16,144 28% Cost allocated to other funds 684,000 171,000 25% 167,434 3,566 2% Transfers In 150,000 - 0% - - 16,895,000 4,093,408 24% 2,734,286 1,359,122 50% $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 Sales Tax
Utility User Tax
Vehicle License Fee (VLF)
Property Taxes
Other Taxes
Intergovernmental
Fines & Forefeitures
Program Revenues
Use of Money & Property
Cost allocated to other funds
Transfers In
City of Hercules
General Fund Y ear-to-date Revenue Report through 9/30/2022 Estimated Revenues vs. Actual
FY 21-22 1st Quarter FY 22-23 1st Quarter Budget
26 Description Budget
FY 22-23
1st Quarter % Used
FY 21-22
1st Quarter
$ Change from
Prior Year
% Change from
Prior Year
Police 8,098,421 2,217,334 27% 2,168,168 49,166 2% Public Works 426,154 116,762 27% 121,113 (4,351) -4% Community Development 865,847 203,231 23% 195,086 8,145 4% Parks and Recreation 2,117,769 678,507 32% 628,410 50,097 8% City Council 345,630 91,634 27% 114,608 (22,974) -20% City Manager 575,142 128,800 22% 91,814 36,986 40% Workers Comp/General Liability 1,266,049 1,033,265 82% 1,200,099 (166,834) -14% Human Resources 335,999 77,652 23% 76,714 938 1% Legal 273,000 42,371 16% 46,932 (4,561) -10% City Clerk/PIO 454,867 91,931 20% 96,494 (4,563) -5% Finance 1,348,625 191,975 14% 465,197 (273,222) -59% Non-Department 645,809 110,000 17% 100,000 10,000 10% Transfers Out 352,000 328,981 93% 319,941 9,040 3% DDR Settlement with DOF 604,025 - 0% - - 0% 17,709,337 5,312,443 30% 5,624,576 (312,133) -6% $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 Police
Public Works
Community Development
Parks and Recreation
City Council
City Manager
Workers Comp/General Liability
Human Resources
Legal
City Clerk/PIO
Finance
Non-Department
Transfers Out
DDR Settlement with DOF
City of Hercules
General Fund Year-to-date Expenditure Report through 9/30/2022 Budget vs. Actual
FY 21-22 1st Quarter FY 22-23 1st Quarter Budget
27 FY 22-23 Year to Date (YTD) Fund Balance Report - All Funds Through September 30, 2022
General Fund
Preliminary
Beginning
Available Balance
Revenues and
Transfers In
Expenditures and
Transfers Out Net Activities
Ending Available
Balance Revenue Expenditure
Fund Number Fund Name 7/1/22 9/30/22 % Collected 9/30/22 % Used 9/30/22 9/30/22 Estimate Budget 100 GENERAL FUND 3,909,022 4,007,563 24% 5,312,443 30% (1,304,880) 2,604,142 16,895,000 17,709,337 103 ARPA (Revenue Loss Allowance) 2,171,889 - 0% - 0% - 2,171,889 - 225,000 6,080,911 4,007,563 5,312,443 (1,304,880) 4,776,031 16,895,000 17,934,337 Special Revenue Funds
Preliminary
Beginning
Available Balance
Revenues and
Transfers In
Expenditures and
Transfers Out Net Activities
Ending Available
Balance Revenue Expenditure
Fund Number Fund Name 7/1/22 9/30/22 % Collected 9/30/22 % Used 9/30/22 9/30/22 Estimate Budget 101 ASSET SEIZURE 69,395 - 0% 7,500 17% (7,500) 61,895 33,000 45,000 201 AB 3229 COPS Program 18,011 74,358 50% - 0% 74,358 92,369 150,000 150,000 220 CITYWIDE L&L DIST 83-2 (235,297) - 0% 571,202 26% (571,202) (806,499) 2,162,025 2,180,718 221 VICTORIA BY THE BAY L&L (315,422) - 0% 180,188 31% (180,188) (495,610) 482,897 588,273 222 HERCULES VILLAGE L&L DIST 179,767 - 0% 63,863 31% (63,863) 115,904 166,305 208,350 223 BAYWOOD ASSESS 04-1 L&L 55,009 - 0% 193,277 129% (193,277) (138,268) 157,261 149,764 224 BAYSIDE ASSESS DIST L&L 146,427 - 0% 40,305 30% (40,305) 106,122 149,231 134,417 225 ARTERIAL ROADWAYS 574,312 - 0% 26,631 8% (26,631) 547,681 314,000 333,123 231 STORMWATER ASSESSMENT (183,570) - 0% 115,316 29% (115,316) (298,886) 376,000 399,540 241 DIF-GEN PUBLIC FACILITIES 143,087 - 0% - 0% - 143,087 - - 242 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FND 166,708 - 0% - 0% - 166,708 - - 243 DEVELOPMENT FEE FUND 71,122 - 0% - 0% - 71,122 - - 244 DIF-POLICE FACILITIES 262,940 - 0% - 0% - 262,940 - 60,000 246 DIF-FIRE FACILITIES 820 - 0% - 0% - 820 - - 247 DIF-PARK & REC 184,426 - 0% - 0% - 184,426 - - 249 PUBLIC BENEFIT FEE 964,565 - 0% - 0% - 964,565 - - 261 DIF-TRAFFIC FACILITIES 153,233 - 0% 12,949 99% (12,949) 140,284 - 13,036 262 STATE GAS TAX FUND 686,466 315,211 22% 140,294 7% 174,917 861,383 1,434,597 1,970,795 263 MEASURE "C" STREET FUND 42,356 - 0% 159,976 27% (159,976) (117,620) 450,000 593,805 264 STMP TRAFFIC IMPACT FUND - - 0% - 0% - - - 24,753 267 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE - 970,072 4619% 73,867 172% 896,205 896,205 21,000 42,936 291 SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING 828,649 43,904 25% 4,058 2% 39,846 868,495 178,000 243,745 521 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY 51,144 - 0% - 0% - 51,144 - - 266 BART (PARK & RIDE) 275,881 17,884 40% 5,661 33% 12,223 288,104 45,000 17,192 4,140,029 1,421,429 23% 1,595,087 22% (173,658) 3,966,371 6,119,316 7,155,447 Enterprise Funds
Preliminary
Beginning
Available Balance
Revenues and
Transfers In
Expenditures and
Transfers Out Net Activities
Ending Available
Balance Revenue Expenditure
Fund Number Fund Name 7/1/22 9/30/22 % Collected 9/30/22 % Used 9/30/22 9/30/22 Estimate Budget 420 WASTEWATER 34,270,401 11,435 0% 977,937 10% (966,502) 33,303,899 6,053,000 9,915,922 This fund is used to account for all revenues and expenditures necessary to carry out basic governmental activities of the City. The General Fund includes activities for police, planning, public works, operations and maintenance, and legal and administration.

Special Revenue Funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than trusts for individuals, private organizations, or other governments, or for major capital projects) that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes.

This fund accounts for wastewater treatment to the cities of Hercules and Pinole and for the maintenance of the City's sewer lines and related facilities. It is a self-supporting activity which provides services on a user charge basis to residences and businesses.
28 FY 22-23 Year to Date (YTD) Fund Balance Report - All Funds Through September 30, 2022
Internal Service Funds
Preliminary
Beginning
Available Balance
Revenues and
Transfers In
Expenditures and
Transfers Out Net Activities
Ending Available
Balance Revenue Expenditure
Fund Number Fund Name 7/1/22 9/30/22 % Collected 9/30/22 % Used 9/30/22 9/30/22 Estimate Budget 450 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 908,085 - 0% - 0% - 908,085 148,300 276,000 460 IT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 605,110 1,702 0% 467,779 36% (466,077) 139,033 1,271,986 1,306,068 470 FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND 517,075 - 0% 188,005 24% (188,005) 329,070 787,000 795,735 2,030,270 1,702 0% 655,784 28% (654,082) 1,376,188 2,207,286 2,377,803 Debt Service Funds
Preliminary
Beginning
Available Balance
Revenues and
Transfers In
Expenditures and
Transfers Out Net Activities
Ending Available
Balance Revenue Expenditure
Fund Number Fund Name 7/1/22 9/30/22 % Collected 9/30/22 % Used 9/30/22 9/30/22 Estimate Budget 672 2003B DEBT SERVICE PFA 158,687 - 0% 1,500 0% (1,500) 157,187 355,934 513,000 673 2009 DEBT SERVICE PFA 1,993,825 - 0% 1,300 0% (1,300) 1,992,525 908,000 908,000 383 SUNTRUST LEASE - 102,549 100% 102,549 100% - - 103,000 103,000 388 EQUIPMENT LEASE - 226,432 100% 226,432 100% - - 227,000 227,000 2,152,512 328,981 331,781 (2,800) 2,149,712 1,593,934 1,751,000 Capital Projects Funds
Preliminary
Beginning
Available Balance
Revenues and
Transfers In
Expenditures and
Transfers Out Net Activities
Ending Available
Balance Revenue Expenditure
Fund Number Fund Name 7/1/22 9/30/22 % Collected 9/30/22 % Used 9/30/22 9/30/22 Estimate Budget 295 STREET CIP GRANTS 473,625 - 0% - 0% - 473,625 492,000 492,000 300 CITY CAPITAL PROJ-SINGLE 1,265,836 - 0% 31,649 4% (31,649) 1,234,187 247,000 708,508 301 ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECT 117,303 - 0% - 0% - 117,303 - 282,637 340 GRANT FUND / STIP / RIP (40,522) 300 0% 12,097 2% (11,797) (52,319) - 780,433 387 WATER QUALITY RET BASIN 182,539 - 0% 9,747 294% (9,747) 172,792 - 3,317 1,998,781 300 53,493 (53,193) 1,945,588 739,000 2,266,895 Agency Funds
Preliminary
Beginning
Available Balance
Revenues and
Transfers In
Expenditures and
Transfers Out Net Activities
Ending Available
Balance Revenue Expenditure
Fund Number Fund Name 7/1/22 9/30/22 % Collected 9/30/22 % Used 9/30/22 9/30/22 Estimate Budget 382 ASSMT DIST 05-01 DEBT SVC 415,829 - 0% 193,196 83% (193,196) 222,633 232,910 232,910 501 TAYLOR WOODROW MAINT LMOD 69,457 - 0% - 0% - 69,457 - - 511 GASB 45 OPEB LIABILITY 2,629,051 (106,945) 0% 14,446 14% (121,391) 2,507,660 118,000 102,000 3,114,337 (106,945) 207,642 (314,587) 2,799,750 350,910 334,910 These funds are used to account for assets held in trust by the City for the benefit of individuals or other entities. Financial Statements may further distinguish fiduciary funds as either trust or agency funds; a trust fund generally exists for a longer period of time than an agency fund.

These funds account for activities related to vehicle replacement, IT equipment replacement, and facilities maintenance.

These funds are used to account for money that will be used to pay the interest and principal of long-term debts. Bonds used by a government to finance major construction projects, to be paid by tax levies over a period of years, require a deby service fund to account for their repayment. The debts of special assessment and proprietary funds are serviced within those funds, rather than by a separate debt service fund.

These funds are used to account for the construction or acquisition of fixed assets, such as buildings, equipment and roads. Depending on its use, a fixed asset may instead be financed by a special revenue fund or a proprietary fund. A capital project fund exists only until completion of the project. 29 City of Hercules
FY 22-23 Year-to-date Capital and Maintenance Project Report Through September 30, 2022
As of 09/30/22 % Expensed
Project
Number Description Previous Years As of 09/30/22
Year-to-Date
Total Previous Years As of 09/30/22
Year-to-Date
Total
Outstanding
Encumbrances
Remaining
Budget
and
Encumbered
63001 HERCULES RAIL STATION 46,017,537 360,000 46,377,537 45,537,271 92,273 45,629,544 - 747,993 98% 63041 SEWER TRUNK LINE REHAB 13,700,000 651,000 14,351,000 940,799 2,447 943,246 1,107,549 12,300,205 14% 63042 WILLOW/PALM PEDESTRIAN 78,195 - 78,195 151,180 1,097 152,277 6,348 (80,430) 203% 63047 2021 REHAB PROJ SYCAMORE - 1,803,716 1,803,716 143,607 68,176 211,783 1,012,421 579,512 68% 63049 UPPER SEWER TRUNK LINE - 100,000 100,000 40,396 - 40,396 17,604 42,000 58% 63052 BAYWOOD TREE REPLACEMENT 162,000 - 162,000 133,000 - 133,000 7,000 22,000 86% 63053 WOOFIELD PARK BACKSTOP 20,000 - 20,000 23,030 - 23,030 - (3,030) 115% 63054 POLICE DEPT EXPANSION 100,000 60,000 160,000 - - - - 160,000 0% 63055 BEECHNUT PARK 254,000 254,000 - - - - 254,000 0% ARP211 STRATEGIC COMMUNICAT PLAN 50,000 - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 0% ARP212 WILLOW/PALM SIDEWALK INST 250,000 - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 0% ARP213 REFUGIO TENNIS COURT TREE 6,000 - 6,000 - - - - 6,000 0% ARP214 SIDEWALK & SAFE WALKWAYS 100,000 - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 0% ARP215 CMMTY SWIM CTR FENCE REPL 100,000 - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 0% ARP216 BLDG & DEFRRED MAINTENANC 250,000 - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 0% ARP218 E-GIFT CARD PROGRAM 65,000 - 65,000 - - - - 65,000 0% ARP221 BUILDING FACILITIES PLAN - 75,000 75,000 - - - - 75,000 0% ARP222 PARKS MASTER PLAN - 150,000 150,000 - - - 190,845 (40,845) 127% ARP223 BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGR 150,000 - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 0% ARP224 BUSINESS RENTAL ASSIST GR 9,551 - 9,551 - - - - 9,551 0% BR2202 SWING SETS 50,000 - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 0% BR2207 TRAFFIC CALMING VILLAGE P 100,000 22,000 122,000 14,870 6,909 21,779 4,401 95,820 21% LLD231 REFURNISH GAZEBBO/RAILING - 55,000 55,000 - - - - 55,000 0% LLD232 OHLONE DOG PK TREE REM/PR - 85,000 85,000 - - - - 85,000 0% LLD233 TREE PLANTING/REM OPEN SP - 50,000 50,000 - 11,500 11,500 - 38,500 23% LLD234 AERATOR REF VALLEY PARKS - 60,000 60,000 - - - - 60,000 0% LLD234 VICTORIA LINEAR PARK - 50,000 50,000 - - - - 50,000 0% 61,462,283 3,521,716 64,983,999 46,984,153 182,402 47,166,555 2,346,168 15,471,276 76%

FUNDING SOURCES
DIF-POLICE FACILITIES 100,000 60,000 160,000 - - - - 160,000 PROPOSITION 68 - STATE GRANT 194,000 194,000 - - - - 194,000 DIF-PARK & REC 60,000 60,000 - - - - 60,000 VICTORIA LLAD. 2001-1 50,000 50,000 - - - - 50,000 LLAD 83-2 ZONE 10 20,000 250,000 270,000 23,030 11,500 34,530 - 235,470 GENERAL FUND 1,130,551 247,000 1,377,551 14,870 82,067 96,937 195,246 1,085,368 BAYWOOD LLAD NO. 2004-1 162,000 162,000 133,000 - 133,000 7,000 22,000 SEWER 13,700,000 751,000 14,451,000 981,195 2,447 983,642 1,125,153 12,342,205 STATE GAS TAX 78,195 1,026,827 1,105,022 246,288 4,607 250,895 491,435 362,692 OBAG 492,000 492,000 - 64,666 64,666 427,334 - MEASURE J RETURN TO SOURCE 184,889 184,889 133,670 - 133,670 - 51,219 SOLID WASTE 100,000 100,000 - - - 100,000 - MEASURE J SP GRANT 223,944 60,000 283,944 258,546 4,166 262,712 - 21,232 MEASURE J TLC GRANT 178,911 178,911 178,911 - 178,911 - - STMP GRANT 724,602 300,000 1,024,602 137,512 - 137,512 - 887,090 DIF-TRAFFIC FACILITIES 12,949 12,949 - 12,949 12,949 - - GRANTS 44,877,131 44,877,131 44,877,131 44,877,131 - - 61,462,283 3,521,716 64,983,999 46,984,153 182,402 47,166,555 2,346,168 15,471,276 Budget Actual Expenditures
30 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Lauren Berges, City Clerk

SUBJECT: Declaring Results of the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution declaring the results of the Consolidated General Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022, determining the elected councilmembers and certifying that Measure N was approved by a majority vote of Hercules voters.

COMMISSION/SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:

There was no Commission or Subcommittee review of this item.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

BACKGROUND:

On June 14, 2022 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-043 calling for the holding of a General Municipal Election for purposes of electing two (2) members to the City Council and Resolution No. 22-043 requesting that Contra Costa County consolidate the General Municipal Election with the General Election to be held on November 8, 2022 and that the County provide specific election services.

On July 21, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-061 to place an ordinance before the voters at the November 8, 2022 General Election to amend Title 8, Chapter 8 of the Hercules Municipal Code to extend the Utility Users Tax at the current rate of 8% until ended by the Voters or repealed by the City Council; requesting that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors consent to the consolidation of this election with the statewide General Election to be held on the same date; and directing the Registrar of Voters to conduct the election.

31 DISCUSSION:

The City of Hercules held a Consolidated General Municipal Election on November 8, 2022 for the purpose of electing two members of the City Council and to vote on Measure N – “Extension of the Existing Utility Users Tax Measure”. The election was conducted on behalf of the City of Hercules by the County of Contra Costa. Pursuant to California Elections Code § 10262 the County Clerk has certified the election results and provided a Statement of the Votes Cast at the City of Hercules Election. Pursuant to Elections Code §10263 the City Council shall adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election.

The ordinance to extend the existing utility users tax, codified in Hercules Municipal Code Chapter 8, § 8-8.101 through § 8-8.503, was introduced by Resolution No. 22-061 at the July 21, 2022 Special City Council meeting. This ordinance was assigned as Measure N by the Contra Costa County Registrar of Voters and placed on the ballot for the election held on November 8, 2022.

Measure N was voted in favor of and thereby deemed adopted by the people by 69.24% of the total votes, exceeding the necessary simple majority vote for passage. Per Elections Code 9217, upon certification, the ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after the declaration of the results of that election by the City Council of the City of Hercules.

Dion Bailey and C hris Kelley were the successful candidates and have been elected to the City Council for full terms of four years.

Candidate Votes Cast
Dion Bailey 5,784
Chris Kelley 4,246
Pamela Vargas 2,181
William “Bill” Henderson 1,476

Enclosed is the Certificate of the County Clerk/Registrar of Voters as to the results of the canvass of the City of Hercules General Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022 including the total votes cast for each candidate and Measure N (Exhibit A).

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Attach 1 - Resolution including Exhibit A.

2. Attach 2 – Measure N Ordinance Text

32

Resolution 22-
RESOLUTION NO. 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HERCULES, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022

DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW

WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Hercules, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precincts we re properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provis ions of the Elections Code of the State of California for the holding of elections in general law cities; and WHEREAS, the County Election Department canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to this City Council, the results are received, attached and made a part hereof as “Exhibit A”.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERCULES, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the whole number of votes (ballots) cast in the precin cts was 919. That the whole number of vote by mail voter ballots cast in the City was 12,769, making a total of 13,688 votes (ballots) cast in the City.

SECTION 2. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows: DION BAILEY , CHRIS KELLEY , PAMELA VARGAS, AND WILLIAM “BILL” HENDERSON.

SECTION 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates were as listed in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

SECTION 4. The City Council does declare and determine that: DION BAILEY was elected as Me mber of the City Council for the full term of four years; CHRIS KELLEY was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years.

SECTION 5. The City Council does declare and determine that Measure N passed as determined by a majority of the votes cast listed in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the result of the election, showing: (1) The whol e number of votes (ballots) cast in the City; (2) The names of the persons voted for; (3) The measure(s) voted upon; (4) For what office each person was voted for; (5) The number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and for and against each measure(s); (6) The total number of votes given to each person, and for and against each measure. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of the persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the office of the City Clerk. Each and all of the persons so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected.

SECTION 8. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the 13th day of December 2022 by the following vote of the Council:

33

Resolution 22-

AYES: Council Members:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

____________________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor

ATTEST:

Lauren Berges
City Clerk

34 35
36 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
GAVIN NEWSOM DEM 493 248,857 16,021 265,371 68.31%
BRIAN DAHLE REP 508 104,237 18,387 123,132 31.69%
Total Votes 1,001 353,094 34,408 388,503
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
GOVERNOR (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ELENI KOUNALAKIS DEM 484 247,298 15,738 263,520 68.85%
ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD
JACOBS REP 502 100,645 18,078 119,225 31.15%
Total Votes 986 347,943 33,816 382,745
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SHIRLEY N. WEBER DEM 492 246,689 15,939 263,120 68.75%
ROB BERNOSKY REP 493 101,172 17,933 119,598 31.25%
Total Votes 985 347,861 33,872 382,718
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
SECRETARY OF STATE (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
Voters Cast: 394,153 of 701,969 (56.15%)
Cards Cast: 1,575,651

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

GENERAL ELECTION
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8 2022
Official Results - Final
Elector Group Counting Group Cards Cast Voters Cast Registered Voters Turnout Total Early In-Person 4,032 1,008 0.14%
Vote By Mail 1,432,362 358,318 51.04%
Election Day 139,257 34,827 4.96%
Total 1,575,651 394,153 701,969 56.15%
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 1 of 33
37 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MALIA M. COHEN DEM 463 227,548 14,853 242,864 63.58%
LANHEE J. CHEN REP 526 119,637 18,937 139,100 36.42%
Total Votes 989 347,185 33,790 381,964
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
CONTROLLER (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
FIONA MA DEM 482 241,681 15,390 257,553 67.49%
JACK M. GUERRERO REP 507 105,170 18,377 124,054 32.51%
Total Votes 989 346,851 33,767 381,607
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
TREASURER (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ROB BONTA DEM 483 242,838 15,635 258,956 67.63%
NATHAN HOCHMAN REP 510 105,276 18,183 123,969 32.37%
Total Votes 993 348,114 33,818 382,925
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ATTORNEY GENERAL (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
RICARDO LARA DEM 489 242,047 15,682 258,218 68.41%
ROBERT HOWELL REP 504 100,966 17,796 119,266 31.59%
Total Votes 993 343,013 33,478 377,484
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 2 of 33
38 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SALLY J. LIEBER DEM 491 237,811 15,506 253,808 67.91%
PETER COE VERBICA REP 501 101,701 17,740 119,942 32.09% Total Votes 992 339,512 33,246 373,750
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, DISTRICT 2 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ALEX PADILLA DEM 494 250,610 16,227 267,331 69.72%
MARK P. MEUSER REP 502 97,890 17,730 116,122 30.28%
Total Votes 996 348,500 33,957 383,453
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ALEX PADILLA DEM 488 247,297 15,963 263,748 69.48%
MARK P. MEUSER REP 499 97,814 17,540 115,853 30.52%
Total Votes 987 345,111 33,503 379,601
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
UNITED STATES SENATOR - SHORT TERM (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
JOHN GARAMENDI DEM 174 80,791 6,033 86,998 80.48%
RUDY RECILE REP 108 17,639 3,351 21,098 19.52%
Total Votes 282 98,430 9,384 108,096
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 285 102,087 9,823 112,195 / 233,947 47.96%
Precincts Reported: 393 of 393 (100.00%)
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 8 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 3 of 33
39 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
TOM PATTI REP 14 3,200 646 3,860 58.06%
JOSH HARDER DEM 6 2,654 128 2,788 41.94%
Total Votes 20 5,854 774 6,648
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 20 6,035 804 6,859 / 11,684 58.70%
Precincts Reported: 27 of 27 (100.00%)
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 9 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MARK DESAULNIER DEM 386 177,859 11,923 190,168 79.00%
MICHAEL ERNEST KERR GRN 208 42,857 7,497 50,562 21.00%
Total Votes 594 220,716 19,420 240,730
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 703 250,196 24,200 275,099 / 456,338 60.28%
Precincts Reported: 845 of 845 (100.00%)
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 10 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
LORI D WILSON DEM 10 8,926 629 9,565 51.20%
JENNY LEILANI CALLISON NPP 36 7,406 1,676 9,118 48.80%
Total Votes 46 16,332 2,305 18,683
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 48 17,971 2,605 20,624 / 41,020 50.28%
Precincts Reported: 130 of 130 (100.00%)
MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, DISTRICT 11 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
BUFFY WICKS DEM 102 57,303 4,099 61,504 83.60%
RICHARD KINNEY REP 31 10,405 1,632 12,068 16.40%
Total Votes 133 67,708 5,731 73,572
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 134 70,258 5,992 76,384 / 147,502 51.79%
Precincts Reported: 242 of 242 (100.00%)
MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, DISTRICT 14 (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 4 of 33
40 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
TIM GRAYSON DEM 239 93,916 6,557 100,712 67.31%
JANELL ELIZABETH PROCTOR REP 281 40,400 8,230 48,911 32.69% Total Votes 520 134,316 14,787 149,623
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 531 139,599 15,344 155,474 / 298,091 52.16%
Precincts Reported: 574 of 574 (100.00%)
MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, DISTRICT 15 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
REBECCA BAUER-KAHAN DEM 137 85,833 4,594 90,564 66.85%
JOSEPH A. RUBAY REP 153 38,870 5,882 44,905 33.15%
Total Votes 290 124,703 10,476 135,469
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 295 130,490 10,886 141,671 / 215,356 65.78%
Precincts Reported: 319 of 319 (100.00%)
MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, DISTRICT 16 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 521 234,668 16,887 252,076 78.78%
No 340 56,389 11,184 67,913 21.22%
Total Votes 861 291,057 28,071 319,989
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,318 34,827 394,153 / 701,969 56.15%

CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
(GUERRERO) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 531 215,176 15,164 230,871 76.52%
No 330 58,931 11,578 70,839 23.48%
Total Votes 861 274,107 26,742 301,710
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT(LIU) (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 5 of 33
41 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 501 209,110 14,913 224,524 76.19%
No 348 58,659 11,156 70,163 23.81%
Total Votes 849 267,769 26,069 294,687
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT(JENKINS) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 482 202,465 13,974 216,921 74.61%
No 357 61,820 11,631 73,808 25.39%
Total Votes 839 264,285 25,605 290,729
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT(GROBAN) (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 480 201,772 14,222 216,474 75.63%
No 346 58,138 11,262 69,746 24.37%
Total Votes 826 259,910 25,484 286,220
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 2 (STEWART) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 493 202,188 14,197 216,878 75.80%
No 336 57,647 11,259 69,242 24.20%
Total Votes 829 259,835 25,456 286,120
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% PRESIDING JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 3 (TUCHER) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 6 of 33
42 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 476 198,195 14,145 212,816 74.92%
No 346 59,701 11,201 71,248 25.08%
Total Votes 822 257,896 25,346 284,064
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 3 (RODRIGUEZ) (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 473 195,825 13,582 209,880 74.47%
No 337 60,251 11,373 71,961 25.53%
Total Votes 810 256,076 24,955 281,841
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 3 (PETROU) (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 477 199,074 13,810 213,361 75.42%
No 341 57,967 11,239 69,547 24.58%
Total Votes 818 257,041 25,049 282,908
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 3 (FUJISAKI) (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 486 203,432 14,516 218,434 77.05%
No 329 54,121 10,628 65,078 22.95%
Total Votes 815 257,553 25,144 283,512
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 4(BROWN) (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 7 of 33
43 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 458 192,089 13,251 205,798 73.33%
No 356 62,859 11,636 74,851 26.67%
Total Votes 814 254,948 24,887 280,649
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 4 (GOLDMAN) (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 483 200,006 13,990 214,479 75.76%
No 339 57,224 11,069 68,632 24.24%
Total Votes 822 257,230 25,059 283,111
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% PRESIDING JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 5 (JACKSON) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 479 194,782 13,729 208,990 74.42%
No 333 60,333 11,165 71,831 25.58%
Total Votes 812 255,115 24,894 280,821
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 1, DIVISION 5 (BURNS) (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
TONY K. THURMOND 469 216,989 14,298 231,756 69.77%
LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN 384 86,633 13,406 100,423 30.23%
Total Votes 853 303,622 27,704 332,179
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 357,501 34,811 393,320 / 701,969 56.03% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 8 of 33
44 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SARAH G. BUTLER 58 36,840 1,758 38,656 48.76%
LISA L. DISBROW 62 19,982 2,370 22,414 28.27%
RUPY KRISHNAN 55 16,452 1,704 18,211 22.97%
Total Votes 175 73,274 5,832 79,281
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 201 88,022 7,262 95,485 / 147,488 64.74%
Precincts Reported: 219 of 219 (100.00%)
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 2 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MIKE MAXWELL 55 27,683 2,357 30,095 40.43%
CHERI CALCAGNO 40 21,039 2,472 23,551 31.64%
ANAITÉ LETONA 45 19,210 1,543 20,798 27.94%
Total Votes 140 67,932 6,372 74,444
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 169 83,966 8,327 92,462 / 149,970 61.65%
Precincts Reported: 231 of 231 (100.00%)
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 4 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ANNETTE LEWIS 54 22,820 1,904 24,778 41.28%
JUSTIN BROWN 89 19,678 3,255 23,022 38.36%
DEREK CARSON II 27 10,720 1,473 12,220 20.36%
Total Votes 170 53,218 6,632 60,020
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 210 62,650 8,064 70,924 / 146,380 48.45%
Precincts Reported: 345 of 345 (100.00%)
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 5 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MARY ROCHA 7 1,915 216 2,138 56.58%
DOMINIQUE KING 5 1,455 181 1,641 43.42%
Total Votes 12 3,370 397 3,779
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 13 3,678 461 4,152 / 11,157 37.21%
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 5 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 9 of 33
45 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DEBORAH ANNE BRANDON 7 2,340 232 2,579 42.08%
TERRI BURK 7 1,732 222 1,961 32.00%
JERROLD "JERRY" PARSONS 7 1,424 158 1,589 25.93%
Total Votes 21 5,496 612 6,129
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 16 4,245 540 4,801 / 9,394 51.11%
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
JOHN SWETT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 2) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
YAZMIN LLAMAS 13 1,141 79 1,233 58.80%
MARCY LEBOEUF 18 756 90 864 41.20%
Total Votes 31 1,897 169 2,097
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 33 2,225 199 2,457 / 4,182 58.75%
Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 3 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DEBRA MASON 11 4,796 397 5,204 49.11%
A.J. FARDELLA 8 2,902 470 3,380 31.90%
JEANETTE GREEN 4 1,781 227 2,012 18.99%
Total Votes 23 9,479 1,094 10,596
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 30 11,122 1,360 12,512 / 28,012 44.67%
Precincts Reported: 44 of 44 (100.00%)
MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 1 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
CHERISE MARIE KHAUND 9 13,389 806 14,204 68.26%
HERBERT LEE 13 5,713 878 6,604 31.74%
Total Votes 22 19,102 1,684 20,808
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 31 23,522 2,237 25,790 / 38,844 66.39%
Precincts Reported: 64 of 64 (100.00%)
MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 4 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 10 of 33
46 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
HELIODORO "HELIO"
MORENO 17 5,179 452 5,648 21.10%
DE'SHAWN WOOLRIDGE 22 5,046 464 5,532 20.66%
DESTINY BRISCOE 18 4,777 458 5,253 19.62%
YESENIA I. ROMAN 12 3,391 408 3,811 14.23%
DUANE SMITH 16 3,224 355 3,595 13.43%
MARIA BAGLEY 16 2,584 333 2,933 10.95%
Total Votes 101 24,203 2,470 26,774
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 48 11,178 1,288 12,514 / 31,832 39.31%
Precincts Reported: 39 of 39 (100.00%)
PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
JESSE VANZEE 26 5,210 794 6,030 42.18%

MICHELLE SINNOTT
PETERSEN 15 5,391 388 5,794 40.53%
JEROME PANDELL 6 2,325 141 2,472 17.29%
Total Votes 47 12,926 1,323 14,296
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 55 14,805 1,487 16,347 / 23,598 69.27%
Precincts Reported: 35 of 35 (100.00%)

SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 1 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DEMETRIO GONZALEZ-HOY 5 8,363 530 8,898 70.99%
OLIVIA LIOU 6 3,273 358 3,637 29.01%
Total Votes 11 11,636 888 12,535
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 12 13,552 1,104 14,668 / 28,541 51.39%
Precincts Reported: 58 of 58 (100.00%)

WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 4 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 11 of 33
47 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
LESLIE RECKLER 22 11,965 687 12,674 61.22%
PATRICIO DUJAN 11 7,413 604 8,028 38.78%
Total Votes 33 19,378 1,291 20,702
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 38 23,590 1,704 25,332 / 36,482 69.44%
Precincts Reported: 39 of 39 (100.00%)

WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 5 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
STEVEN DROUIN 0 43 3 46 18.18%
CRAIG BUENO 0 40 0 40 15.81%
EMILY PRUSSO 0 39 1 40 15.81%
ANNE E. WHITE 0 28 0 28 11.07%
JOHN M. KUPSKI 0 28 0 28 11.07%
ALEXANDRIA IZARRARAZ 0 25 1 26 10.28%
DEENA KAPLANIS 0 25 1 26 10.28%
KRISTINA MAZAIKA 0 11 1 12 4.74%
HAYDEN SIDUN 0 6 1 7 2.77%
Total Votes 0 245 8 253
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 0 131 5 136 / 180 75.56%
Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)

LIVERMORE VALLEY JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
JENNIFER CHEN 60 34,463 1,851 36,374 27.23%
CHRISTOPHER SEVERSON 53 30,203 1,382 31,638 23.68%
NANCY KENDZIERSKI 45 29,834 1,390 31,269 23.40%
MARK WOOLWAY 50 9,769 1,216 11,035 8.26%
RENEE NOWAC 49 9,168 1,173 10,390 7.78%
GABE LEDEEN 43 8,584 1,025 9,652 7.22%
CLAYTON GARDNER 11 2,841 390 3,242 2.43%
Total Votes 311 124,862 8,427 133,600
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 127 55,650 4,075 59,852 / 85,239 70.22%
Precincts Reported: 117 of 117 (100.00%)
ACALANES UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 12 of 33
48 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SUSAN WALLACE 26 3,323 454 3,803 57.02%
KRISTEN ROMANO 10 1,421 303 1,734 26.00%
DANTE ROSS 5 1,024 104 1,133 16.99%
Total Votes 41 5,768 861 6,670
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 44 7,067 1,086 8,197 / 15,725 52.13%
Precincts Reported: 45 of 45 (100.00%)
LIBERTY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 3 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SANDY MCCASLIN 9 4,201 538 4,748 68.50%
DARLENE B. WEAVER 6 1,845 332 2,183 31.50%
Total Votes 15 6,046 870 6,931
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 24 8,080 1,200 9,304 / 16,926 54.97%
Precincts Reported: 51 of 51 (100.00%)
LIBERTY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER, AREA 4 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SEQUOIA ALBA 0 96 4 100 30.40%
ADAM RABINOVITZ 0 85 1 86 26.14%
LAURA ESPERANZA SURLS 0 69 5 74 22.49%
KENNETH HOGARTY 0 68 1 69 20.97%
Total Votes 0 318 11 329
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 0 137 5 142 / 178 79.78%
Precincts Reported: 3 of 3 (100.00%)
CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 13 of 33
49 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ROB STURM 12 9,431 554 9,997 26.18%
DAVE SMITH 15 9,126 523 9,664 25.31%
KATY FOREMAN 11 8,924 567 9,502 24.88%
SARAH LIND 9 2,873 423 3,305 8.65%
ROBB MCSORLEY 5 2,580 394 2,979 7.80%
NIELS LARSEN 10 2,348 385 2,743 7.18%
Total Votes 62 35,282 2,846 38,190
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 26 14,165 1,247 15,438 / 21,354 72.30%
Precincts Reported: 27 of 27 (100.00%)
LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
LARRY JACOBS 3 5,074 287 5,364 32.66%
MARTHA A. WHITE 4 4,327 283 4,614 28.09%
KRISTIN KRAETSCH 2 3,424 225 3,651 22.23%
HEN KING 2 2,608 184 2,794 17.01%
Total Votes 11 15,433 979 16,423
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 5 7,571 550 8,126 / 11,626 69.90%
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
MORAGA SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
EDDA COLLINS COLEMAN 3 5,104 253 5,360 22.96%
EVE M. PHILLIPS 9 4,729 308 5,046 21.62%
KATIE SHOGAN 5 4,681 315 5,001 21.42%
MICHELLE CHANG 5 4,312 263 4,580 19.62%
LINDA DELEHUNT 4 3,154 198 3,356 14.38%
Total Votes 26 21,980 1,337 23,343
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 9 10,093 685 10,787 / 15,057 71.64%
Precincts Reported: 31 of 31 (100.00%)
ORINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 14 of 33
50 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
AIMEE MOSS 48 12,879 542 13,469 25.44%
NITHIN IYENGAR 38 12,539 519 13,096 24.74%
HEIDI HERNANDEZ GATTY 39 12,288 498 12,825 24.22%
GAIL CONTRERAS 36 6,224 650 6,910 13.05%
MICHAELA STRAZNICKA 35 6,010 600 6,645 12.55%
Total Votes 196 49,940 2,809 52,945
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 87 23,684 1,588 25,359 / 37,024 68.49%
Precincts Reported: 49 of 49 (100.00%)
WALNUT CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD MEMBER (Vote for 3) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
KEN CARLSON 60 39,814 2,956 42,830 53.93%
DEBORA ALLEN 98 32,417 4,068 36,583 46.07%
Total Votes 158 72,231 7,024 79,413
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 183 83,742 8,297 92,222 / 151,451 60.89%
Precincts Reported: 230 of 230 (100.00%)
SUPERVISOR, DISTRICT 4 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
KRISTIN BRAUN CONNELLY 377 157,770 11,475 169,622 53.47% VICKI GORDON 447 131,506 15,649 147,602 46.53%
Total Votes 824 289,276 27,124 317,224
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,270 34,816 394,094 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
CLERK-RECORDER (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
TAMISHA TORRES-WALKER 2 1,306 159 1,467 34.36%
JOY MOTTS 3 1,277 184 1,464 34.29%
DIANE GIBSON-GRAY 2 1,162 175 1,339 31.36%
Total Votes 7 3,745 518 4,270
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 8 4,039 574 4,621 / 12,437 37.16%
Precincts Reported: 24 of 24 (100.00%)
CITY OF ANTIOCH, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 1 (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 15 of 33
51 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MONICA E WILSON 4 2,386 229 2,619 36.60%
LORI OGORCHOCK 4 1,804 187 1,995 27.88%
SHAWN PICKETT 3 1,179 142 1,324 18.50%
SANDRA G. WHITE 1 1,074 143 1,218 17.02%
Total Votes 12 6,443 701 7,156
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 14 6,946 760 7,720 / 17,032 45.33%
Precincts Reported: 38 of 38 (100.00%)
CITY OF ANTIOCH, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 4 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
PATANISHA DAVIS PIERSON 4 1,408 114 1,526 37.07%
SINZIANA TODOR 3 1,052 99 1,154 28.03%
MARK DUKE 3 739 165 907 22.03%
BRAYDEN HAENA 5 455 70 530 12.87%
Total Votes 15 3,654 448 4,117
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 17 4,070 527 4,614 / 9,443 48.86%
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
CITY OF BRENTWOOD, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 2 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
TONY OERLEMANS 16 1,859 315 2,190 51.98%
HOLLEY BISHOP-LOPEZ 9 998 163 1,170 27.77%
JACOB SINGH 5 787 61 853 20.25%
Total Votes 30 3,644 539 4,213
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 31 4,126 640 4,797 / 9,359 51.26%
Precincts Reported: 16 of 16 (100.00%)
CITY OF BRENTWOOD, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 4 (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 16 of 33
52 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
JEFF WAN 0 2,545 316 2,861 30.57%
KIM TRUPIANO 0 2,046 285 2,331 24.90%
BRIDGET BILLETER 0 1,941 158 2,099 22.43%
ED MILLER 1 1,870 198 2,069 22.10%
Total Votes 1 8,402 957 9,360
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1 5,209 606 5,816 / 8,477 68.61%
Precincts Reported: 10 of 10 (100.00%)
CITY OF CLAYTON, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 2)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
LAURA HOFFMEISTER 4 3,231 309 3,544 43.25%
ROBERT RING 2 2,383 417 2,802 34.20%
QUINNE ANDERSON 0 1,698 150 1,848 22.55%
Total Votes 6 7,312 876 8,194
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 6 8,293 1,002 9,301 / 16,108 57.74%
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
CITY OF CONCORD, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 1 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DOMINIC ALIANO 11 1,903 239 2,153 99.95%
Total Votes 11 1,903 240 2,154
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 14 2,583 336 2,933 / 8,177 35.87%
Precincts Reported: 9 of 9 (100.00%)
CITY OF CONCORD, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 3 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
LAURA NAKAMURA 5 4,488 417 4,910 56.04%
TIM MCGALLIAN 7 3,461 383 3,851 43.96%
Total Votes 12 7,949 800 8,761
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 16 8,943 971 9,930 / 16,449 60.37%
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
CITY OF CONCORD, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 5 (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 17 of 33
53 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
EDITH "PATTI" BARSOTTI 34 22,771 1,982 24,787 77.37%
D'MARCO J. ANTHONY 24 6,169 1,057 7,250 22.63%
Total Votes 58 28,940 3,039 32,037
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 71 35,420 4,014 39,505 / 71,827 55.00%
Precincts Reported: 109 of 109 (100.00%)
CITY OF CONCORD, TREASURER (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
CAROLYN WYSINGER 8 5,733 329 6,070 37.18%
GABRIEL QUINTO 7 5,433 288 5,728 35.09%
VANESSA WARHEIT 10 4,254 262 4,526 27.73%
Total Votes 25 15,420 879 16,324
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 15 11,196 735 11,946 / 17,376 68.75%
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
CITY OF EL CERRITO, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 2)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DION BAILEY 6 5,434 344 5,784 42.26%
CHRIS KELLEY 5 4,002 239 4,246 31.02%
PAMELA VARGAS 4 2,001 176 2,181 15.93%
WILLIAM "BILL" HENDERSON
1 1,331 144 1,476 10.78%
Total Votes 16 12,769 903 13,688
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 11 8,189 640 8,840 / 17,031 51.91%
Precincts Reported: 19 of 19 (100.00%)
CITY OF HERCULES, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 2)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
STEVE WOEHLEKE 5 4,917 291 5,213 51.32%
KERRY HILLIS 4 4,636 303 4,943 48.67%
Total Votes 9 9,554 594 10,157
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 5 7,493 548 8,046 / 11,477 70.11%
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
TOWN OF MORAGA, MEMBER, TOWN COUNCIL - FULL TERM (Vote for 2) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 18 of 33
54 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DAVID SHAPIRO 3 4,549 267 4,819 72.29%
KENDALL W. LANGAN 2 1,699 146 1,847 27.71%
Total Votes 5 6,248 413 6,666
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 5 7,493 548 8,046 / 11,477 70.11%
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
TOWN OF MORAGA, MEMBER, TOWN COUNCIL - SHORT TERM (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
BRIANNE ZORN 23 3,656 180 3,859 24.40%
SEAN TRAMBLEY 31 3,373 264 3,668 23.19%
LARA E. DELANEY 34 3,289 213 3,536 22.36%
MIKE MENESINI 22 1,824 148 1,994 12.61%
MARK ROSS 11 1,699 98 1,808 11.43%
MICHAEL R AYERS 37 779 135 951 6.01%
Total Votes 158 14,620 1,038 15,816
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 171 15,564 1,133 16,868 / 25,827 65.31%
Precincts Reported: 83 of 83 (100.00%)
CITY OF MARTINEZ, MAYOR (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
JAY HOWARD 58 1,745 102 1,905 57.76%
NAKENYA ALLEN 14 1,315 64 1,393 42.24%
Total Votes 72 3,060 166 3,298
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 81 3,464 204 3,749 / 5,905 63.49%
Precincts Reported: 31 of 31 (100.00%)
CITY OF MARTINEZ, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 1 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DEBBIE MCKILLOP 10 2,064 108 2,182 50.28%
BEN THERRIAULT 21 2,032 105 2,158 49.72%
Total Votes 31 4,096 213 4,340
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 38 4,529 246 4,813 / 6,878 69.98%
Precincts Reported: 26 of 26 (100.00%)
CITY OF MARTINEZ, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 4 (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 19 of 33
55 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
HUGH HENDERSON 2 895 163 1,060 54.00%
RACHELLE "SHELLY"
FITZGERALD 0 818 85 903 46.00%
Total Votes 2 1,713 248 1,963
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 2 1,897 281 2,180 / 4,798 45.44%
Precincts Reported: 13 of 13 (100.00%)
CITY OF OAKLEY, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 2 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SHANNON SHAW 5 1,615 164 1,784 89.60%
Total Votes 5 1,806 180 1,991
Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ADAM MICHAEL GERHART WRITE-IN 0 190 16 206 10.35%
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 6 2,371 294 2,671 / 5,861 45.57%
Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
CITY OF OAKLEY, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 4 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
LATIKA MALKANI 3 5,418 258 5,679 23.56%
BRANDYN IVERSON 5 4,444 269 4,718 19.58%
JANET RILEY 4 4,299 258 4,561 18.92%
ALEX DREXEL 6 3,361 216 3,583 14.87%
STUART HOUSE 2 3,098 202 3,302 13.70%
SUNIL RAJARAMAN 3 2,065 190 2,258 9.37%
Total Votes 23 22,685 1,393 24,101
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 9 10,100 686 10,795 / 15,049 71.73%
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
CITY OF ORINDA, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 3)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 20 of 33
56 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
CAMERON SASAI 6 3,008 202 3,216 19.38%
ANTHONY L. TAVE 0 2,985 172 3,157 19.02%
NORMA MARTINEZ-RUBIN 4 2,428 175 2,607 15.71%
DEBBIE LONG 0 2,250 170 2,420 14.58%
JUSTIN MARTINEZ 2 2,167 158 2,327 14.02%
PETER MURRAY 1 1,862 163 2,026 12.21%
RAFAEL MENIS 3 770 68 841 5.07%
Total Votes 16 15,470 1,108 16,594
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 7 6,310 522 6,839 / 12,172 56.19%
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)
CITY OF PINOLE, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total

SHANELLE SCALES-PRESTON
28 8,059 730 8,817 26.82%
DIONNE ADAMS 27 7,088 593 7,708 23.45%
ANGELICA LOPEZ 22 6,065 680 6,767 20.59%
WOLF CROSKEY 18 5,023 572 5,613 17.07%
SONJA SHEPHARD 14 3,521 410 3,945 12.00%
Total Votes 109 29,775 2,989 32,873
Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
IVELINE D. POPOVA WRITE-IN 0 19 3 22 0.07%
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 53 14,120 1,617 15,790 / 39,503 39.97%
Precincts Reported: 50 of 50 (100.00%)
CITY OF PITTSBURG, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ALICE E. EVENSON 41 10,699 1,094 11,834 100.00%
Total Votes 41 10,699 1,094 11,834
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 53 14,120 1,617 15,790 / 39,503 39.97%
Precincts Reported: 50 of 50 (100.00%)
CITY OF PITTSBURG, CITY CLERK (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 21 of 33
57 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
NANCY PARENT 43 10,737 1,079 11,859 100.00%
Total Votes 43 10,737 1,079 11,859
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 53 14,120 1,617 15,790 / 39,503 39.97%
Precincts Reported: 50 of 50 (100.00%)
CITY OF PITTSBURG, TREASURER (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SUE NOACK 8 6,312 412 6,732 29.04%
ZAC SHESS 10 5,422 485 5,917 25.53%
ZHANNA THOMPSON 9 4,036 263 4,308 18.59%
BILL BANKERT 7 2,851 358 3,216 13.87%
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ 3 1,692 193 1,888 8.15%
ANDREI OBOLENSKIY 6 966 145 1,117 4.82%
Total Votes 43 21,280 1,856 23,179
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 27 13,463 1,270 14,760 / 23,049 64.04%
Precincts Reported: 29 of 29 (100.00%)
CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 2) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ANDREW J. KALINOWSKI 20 9,314 775 10,109 100.00%
Total Votes 20 9,314 775 10,109
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 27 13,463 1,270 14,760 / 23,049 64.04%
Precincts Reported: 29 of 29 (100.00%)
CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, TREASURER (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
EDUARDO MARTINEZ 23 9,511 785 10,319 39.20%
SHAWN DUNNING 22 7,033 612 7,667 29.12%
NATHANIEL "NAT" BATES 17 6,611 702 7,330 27.84%
MARK WASSBERG 7 854 148 1,009 3.83%
Total Votes 69 24,009 2,247 26,325
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 72 25,404 2,443 27,919 / 57,945 48.18%
Precincts Reported: 106 of 106 (100.00%)
CITY OF RICHMOND, MAYOR (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 22 of 33
58 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ANDREW BUTT 4 1,733 184 1,921 50.00%
CESAR ZEPEDA 3 1,753 165 1,921 50.00%
Total Votes 7 3,486 349 3,842
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 7 3,784 403 4,194 / 8,616 48.68%
Precincts Reported: 26 of 26 (100.00%)
CITY OF RICHMOND, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 2 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DORIA D. ROBINSON 8 1,015 122 1,145 39.62%
OSCAR GARCIA 4 770 125 899 31.11%
COURTLAND CORKY BOOZÉ 3 736 107 846 29.27%
Total Votes 15 2,521 354 2,890
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 16 2,684 395 3,095 / 8,505 36.39%
Precincts Reported: 17 of 17 (100.00%)
CITY OF RICHMOND, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 3 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
SOHEILA BANA 2 3,919 270 4,191 67.40%
JAMIN PURSELL 3 1,868 156 2,027 32.60%
Total Votes 5 5,787 426 6,218
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 5 6,336 494 6,835 / 12,417 55.05%
Precincts Reported: 20 of 20 (100.00%)
CITY OF RICHMOND, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 4 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DAVID E. "DAVE" HUDSON 26 11,613 1,159 12,798 48.64%
SABINA ZAFAR 6 6,895 401 7,302 27.75%
DINESH B. GOVINDARAO 4 5,637 568 6,209 23.60%
Total Votes 36 24,145 2,128 26,309
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 37 25,777 2,311 28,125 / 49,271 57.08%
Precincts Reported: 86 of 86 (100.00%)
CITY OF SAN RAMON, MAYOR (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 23 of 33
59 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MARK ARMSTRONG 6 4,114 427 4,547 59.23%
SARA LASHANLO 2 2,932 196 3,130 40.77%
Total Votes 8 7,046 623 7,677
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 9 8,058 727 8,794 / 14,110 62.32%
Precincts Reported: 22 of 22 (100.00%)
CITY OF SAN RAMON, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 2 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MARISOL RUBIO 8 3,579 246 3,833 64.25%
HEIDI KENNISTON-LEE 1 1,976 156 2,133 35.75%
Total Votes 9 5,555 402 5,966
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 9 6,589 505 7,103 / 12,507 56.79%
Precincts Reported: 28 of 28 (100.00%)
CITY OF SAN RAMON, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 4 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MATT FRANCOIS 50 16,842 927 17,819 36.25%
CINDY EISLEY SILVA 42 15,298 832 16,172 32.90%
LAURA PATCH 25 8,201 564 8,790 17.88%
BRIAN O'TOOLE 17 5,717 644 6,378 12.97%
Total Votes 134 46,058 2,967 49,159
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 88 31,073 2,283 33,444 / 49,007 68.24%
Precincts Reported: 61 of 61 (100.00%)
CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL (Vote for 2) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
RONALD CASSANO 63 20,254 1,193 21,510 100.00%
Total Votes 63 20,254 1,193 21,510
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 88 31,073 2,283 33,444 / 49,007 68.24%
Precincts Reported: 61 of 61 (100.00%)
CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, TREASURER (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 24 of 33
60 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
GREGORY R LORENZ 1 275 46 322 22.90%
JERRY SLAVONIA 1 262 52 315 22.40%
CHRISTINE CHARTIER 1 258 49 308 21.91%
JEFFERY C. EORIO 0 228 19 247 17.57%
GARTH B. HOBDEN 0 198 16 214 15.22%
Total Votes 3 1,221 182 1,406
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1 507 76 584 / 778 75.06%
Precincts Reported: 1 of 1 (100.00%)
DIABLO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, DIRECTOR (Vote for 3) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ASHLEY PORTER 7 3,270 346 3,623 29.39%
J. KEVIN GRAVES 10 2,917 335 3,262 26.46%
BRYON GUTOW 8 2,927 317 3,252 26.38%
LEONARD D. WOREN 5 1,913 274 2,192 17.78%
Total Votes 30 11,027 1,272 12,329
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 17 5,346 734 6,097 / 10,280 59.31%
Precincts Reported: 15 of 15 (100.00%)

TOWN OF DISCOVERY BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, DIRECTOR (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ANN MARIE JOHNSON 3 3,870 241 4,114 57.64%
JIM BRADY 6 2,689 328 3,023 42.36%
Total Votes 9 6,559 569 7,137
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 9 7,817 694 8,520 / 14,504 58.74%
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION 2 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 25 of 33
61 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
ALEXANDRA AQUINO-FIKE 2 1,954 107 2,063 25.83%
SARAH A. GOUGH 2 1,948 104 2,054 25.71%
CASSANDRA ROSE DUGGAN 0 1,571 92 1,663 20.82%
GAIL FELDMAN 2 1,194 54 1,250 15.65%
MIKE LOGAN 4 916 38 958 11.99%
Total Votes 10 7,583 395 7,988
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 4 3,153 188 3,345 / 4,322 77.39%
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)

KENSINGTON POLICE PROTECTION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, DIRECTOR (Vote for 3)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
JULIE MARIE STEIN 3 2,277 115 2,395 31.06%
DANIEL LEVINE 2 2,122 106 2,230 28.92%
JIM WATT 3 1,892 113 2,008 26.04%
JANICE KOSEL 2 1,022 54 1,078 13.98%
Total Votes 10 7,313 388 7,711
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 4 3,153 188 3,345 / 4,322 77.39%
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
KENSINGTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, DIRECTOR (Vote for 3) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
GREG HASLER 2 1,384 88 1,474 52.55%
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG 0 1,252 79 1,331 47.45%
Total Votes 2 2,636 167 2,805
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 2 3,168 228 3,398 / 4,725 71.92%
Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
MORAGA-ORINDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION 1 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 26 of 33
62 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total

STEVEN MICHAEL DANZIGER
4 2,045 120 2,169 63.02%
VINCE DELL' AQUILA 1 1,185 87 1,273 36.98%
Total Votes 5 3,230 207 3,442
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 5 3,664 257 3,926 / 5,622 69.83%
Precincts Reported: 14 of 14 (100.00%)
MORAGA-ORINDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION 3 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MIKE ROEMER 2 1,751 100 1,853 50.86%
MICHAEL DONNER 0 1,689 101 1,790 49.14%
Total Votes 2 3,440 201 3,643
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 2 3,899 253 4,154 / 5,717 72.66%
Precincts Reported: 6 of 6 (100.00%)
MORAGA-ORINDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION 4 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
DELANO DOSS 18 7,231 619 7,868 32.03%
MARIE BOWMAN 8 5,893 397 6,298 25.64%
STEVE HILL 5 5,077 338 5,420 22.07%
TARA SHAIA 7 2,591 261 2,859 11.64%
ANN CARGO ZIFF 4 1,935 179 2,118 8.62%
Total Votes 42 22,727 1,794 24,563
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 21 10,504 942 11,467 / 22,662 50.60%
Precincts Reported: 26 of 26 (100.00%)
RODEO-HERCULES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, DIRECTOR (Vote for 3) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MARGUERITE YOUNG 17 17,026 898 17,941 72.20%
MARK SEEDALL 7 6,270 632 6,909 27.80%
Total Votes 24 23,296 1,530 24,850
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 25 28,954 2,088 31,067 / 47,665 65.18%
Precincts Reported: 83 of 83 (100.00%)
EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, WARD 3 (Vote for 1) 12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 27 of 33
63 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
APRIL CHAN 2 2,171 188 2,361 44.87%
MATT TURNER 6 1,328 172 1,506 28.62%
CORINA N. LOPEZ 3 1,251 141 1,395 26.51%
Total Votes 11 4,750 501 5,262
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 12 5,822 639 6,473 / 10,843 59.70%
Precincts Reported: 12 of 12 (100.00%)
EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, WARD 7 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
CHERYL SUDDUTH 4 3,848 183 4,035 69.32%
JEFFERY D. WINTER 3 1,634 149 1,786 30.68%
Total Votes 7 5,482 332 5,821
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 7 6,332 429 6,768 / 13,012 52.01%
Precincts Reported: 29 of 29 (100.00%)
WEST COUNTY WASTEWATER DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION 5 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
JOEL YOUNG 61 24,204 2,081 26,346 57.93%
ALFRED TWU 27 17,804 1,303 19,134 42.07%
Total Votes 88 42,008 3,384 45,480
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 105 50,770 4,338 55,213 / 106,769 51.71%
Precincts Reported: 178 of 178 (100.00%)
ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, AT LARGE (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
MILAN "PETE" PETROVICH 0 46 5 51 54.26%
LARRY ENOS 0 42 1 43 45.74%
Total Votes 0 88 6 94
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 0 97 6 103 / 170 60.59%
Precincts Reported: 1 of 1 (100.00%)
BYRON BETHANY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION 1 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 28 of 33
64 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
PATT YOUNG 24 10,135 910 11,069 53.47%
MARIAH LAURITZEN 29 8,429 1,173 9,631 46.53%
Total Votes 53 18,564 2,083 20,700
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 60 22,053 2,618 24,731 / 54,391 45.47%
Precincts Reported: 86 of 86 (100.00%)
CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION 1 (Vote for 1) Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 559 271,002 18,966 290,527 75.64%
No 405 78,466 14,713 93,584 24.36%
Total Votes 964 349,468 33,679 384,111
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,270 34,816 394,094 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
PROPOSITION 1 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
No 679 237,616 22,888 261,183 69.14%
Yes 296 105,871 10,417 116,584 30.86%
Total Votes 975 343,487 33,305 377,767
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,270 34,816 394,094 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
PROPOSITION 26 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
No 797 291,635 26,366 318,798 83.47%
Yes 182 55,760 7,185 63,127 16.53%
Total Votes 979 347,395 33,551 381,925
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,270 34,816 394,094 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
PROPOSITION 27 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 29 of 33
65 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 585 246,928 20,205 267,718 69.55%
No 401 103,126 13,709 117,236 30.45%
Total Votes 986 350,054 33,914 384,954
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,273 34,803 394,084 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
PROPOSITION 28 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
No 645 234,033 22,645 257,323 67.75%
Yes 324 111,443 10,719 122,486 32.25%
Total Votes 969 345,476 33,364 379,809
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,273 34,803 394,084 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
PROPOSITION 29 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
No 620 186,902 21,494 209,016 54.23%
Yes 365 163,664 12,395 176,424 45.77%
Total Votes 985 350,566 33,889 385,440
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,273 34,803 394,084 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
PROPOSITION 30 (Vote for 1)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 589 256,033 19,671 276,293 72.12%
No 398 92,386 14,017 106,801 27.88%
Total Votes 987 348,419 33,688 383,094
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 1,008 358,273 34,803 394,084 / 701,969 56.14% Precincts Reported: 1,265 of 1,265 (100.00%)
PROPOSITION 31 (Vote for 1)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 30 of 33
66 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 2 287 54 343 58.73%
No 1 196 44 241 41.27%
Total Votes 3 483 98 584
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 3 502 103 608 / 1,054 57.69%

MEASURE R - KNIGHTSEN TOWN COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT - MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 18 of 18 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 4 2,200 101 2,305 81.28%
No 0 485 46 531 18.72%
Total Votes 4 2,685 147 2,836
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 4 3,156 188 3,348 / 4,322 77.46%

MEASURE I - KENSINGTON POLICE PROTECTION AND
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT - MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Bonds No 0 68 4 72 55.81%
Bonds Yes 0 56 1 57 44.19%
Total Votes 0 124 5 129
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 0 132 5 137 / 180 76.11%

MEASURE G - LIVERMORE VALLEY JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT -55% (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 7 of 7 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Bonds Yes 44 14,243 742 15,029 62.65%
Bonds No 40 8,190 729 8,959 37.35%
Total Votes 84 22,433 1,471 23,988
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 87 23,767 1,587 25,441 / 37,024 68.71%
MEASURE J - WALNUT CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT - 55% (Vote
for 1)
Precincts Reported: 49 of 49 (100.00%)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 31 of 33
67 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Bonds Yes 69 6,194 382 6,645 52.60%
Bonds No 80 5,426 483 5,989 47.40%
Total Votes 149 11,620 865 12,634
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 157 12,088 902 13,147 / 20,887 62.94%
MEASURE K - MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT - 55% (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 88 of 88 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 4 845 109 958 62.78%
No 1 483 84 568 37.22%
Total Votes 5 1,328 193 1,526
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 5 1,386 197 1,588 / 2,561 62.01%

MEASURE L - CROCKETT COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT -
MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 14 6,903 551 7,468 56.58%
No 11 5,124 597 5,732 43.42%
Total Votes 25 12,027 1,148 13,200
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 27 13,481 1,271 14,779 / 23,049 64.12%

MEASURE M - CITY OF PLEASANT HILL -
MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 29 of 29 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 10 5,480 392 5,882 69.24%
No 1 2,385 227 2,613 30.76%
Total Votes 11 7,865 619 8,495
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 11 8,200 641 8,852 / 17,031 51.98%

MEASURE N - CITY OF HERCULES -
MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 19 of 19 (100.00%)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 32 of 33
68 Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 51 19,722 1,143 20,916 65.05%
No 34 10,172 1,031 11,237 34.95%
Total Votes 85 29,894 2,174 32,153
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 88 31,062 2,282 33,432 / 49,007 68.22%
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 28 14,139 1,223 15,390 58.81%
No 39 9,709 1,032 10,780 41.19%
Total Votes 67 23,848 2,255 26,170
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 72 25,427 2,443 27,942 / 57,945 48.22%

MEASURE P - CITY OF RICHMOND -
MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 106 of 106 (100.00%)
Candidate Party Early In-
Person
Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Yes 61 12,568 1,190 13,819 64.28%
No 51 6,417 1,212 7,680 35.72%
Total Votes 112 18,985 2,402 21,499
Early In-Perso Vote By Mail Election Day Total
Times Cast 114 20,122 2,554 22,790 / 41,105 55.44%

MEASURE Q - CITY OF BRENTWOOD -
MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 65 of 65 (100.00%)
12/2/2022 11:31:32 AMPage: 33 of 33

MEASURE O - CITY OF WALNUT CREEK -
MAJORITY (Vote for 1)
Precincts Reported: 61 of 61 (100.00%)
69 220729
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERCULES AMENDING TITLE 8, CHAPTER 8 OF

THE HERCULES MUNICIPAL CODE TO EXTEND THE UTILITY USERS TAX AT THE CURRENT RATE OF 8% UNTIL ENDED BY THE VOTERS OR REPEALED BY THE

CITY COUNCIL

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF HERCULES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Amendments to Municipal Code (deletions in strikethrough; additions in italics).

Sections 8-8.318, 8-8.401, 8-8.406, 8-8.407, 8-8.408, and 8-8.409 of the Hercules Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows:

Sec. 8-8.318 Sunset Termination of Tax.

This Chapter shall automatically sunset, and its provisions shall become ineffective, on January 1, 2025. (Ord. 475 § 1 (part), 2013: Ord. 395 § 1 (part), 2004. Formerly 8-8.320) The levy of taxes as provided in this Chapter shall remain in full force and effect until ended by the voters or repealed by the City Council.

Sec. 8-8.401 Purpose.
(a) The purpose of this Article is to continue the increase of two percent (2%) to the existing six percent (6%) utility users tax rate approved by the voters at the June 4, 2013, special election, for a total utility users tax rate of eight percent (8%), which eight percent (8%) rate shall be applicable from the effective date of this Article to all categories of utility services identified in this Chapter, including but not limited to telephone, electricity, gas, water, cable and video, until ended by the voters or repealed by the City Council. such time as the Finance Commission determines that the City has met its goal of achieving long term fiscal stability with adequate reserves, and the City Council approves by a two-thirds (2/3) vote to terminate the two percent (2%) increase pursuant to Section 8-8.409, after which the rate shall revert to six percent (6%), with said six percent (6%) rate to sunset on the date indicated in Section 8-8.318. (b) The continuation of the 2013 voter approved tax increase is pursuant to voter approval at the November 3, 2015, special election. (Ord. 489 § 1 (part), 2015: Ord. 481 § 2 (part), 2014: Ord. 475 § 1 (part), 2013)
70 Sec. 8-8.406 Duties.
(a) The Commission is charged with the following responsibilities: (1) reviewing all appropriations of revenues received by the City from the sales and use taxes imposed pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter to determine whether such funds are to be used as provided for in this Chapter and the voter approved measure that adopted this Chapter; (2) reviewing the audit prepared by an independent auditor retained by the City to perform the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to determine whether such funds have been spent as provided for in this Chapter and the voter approved measure; and (3) prepare and issue the Commission’s own annual report setting forth their findings in regard to the foregoing; and (4) determining when the City has met its goal of achieving long term financial stability with adequate financial reserves, and issuing a report to Council detailing such findings, pursuant to Section 8-8.409. (b) In order to preserve the integrity and independence of the oversight process, Commission members will not play a formal role in contracting, project management, construction, or any other aspect of the funding. In addition, the Commission is not charged with decision-making on spending priorities, construction schedules, project details, funding source decisions (e.g., leveraged funds, developer fees, etc.), financing plans, tax rate assumptions, or selection of consultants, design, and construction firms. (Ord. 489 § 1 (part), 2015: Ord. 481 § 2 (part), 2014:

Ord. 475 § 1 (part), 2013)
Sec. 8-8.407 Effective Date.

This Article relates to the continuation of an temporary increase of two percent (2%) to the City’s existing utility users tax rate, and is a valid and binding City tax upon passage and approval by a majority of the electorate of the City of Hercules. This Article shall be considered adopted upon the date that the vote is declared by the legislative body and shall go into effect ten (10) days after that date. (Ord. 489 § 1 (part), 2015: Ord. 481 § 2 (part), 2014: Ord. 475 § 1 (part), 2013) Sec. 8-8.408 Amendments.

The City Council of the City of Hercules may make amendments to this Chapter without approval of the voters of the City if the amendments do not affect the rate of tax imposed. The City Council may amend the rate of tax imposed herein (increase or decrease) or extend the term of the tax, only upon two-thirds (2/3) vote of the Council and with approval of the voters of the City under applicable codes. (Ord. 489 § 1 (part), 2015: Ord. 481 § 2 (part), 2014: Ord. 475 § 1 (part), 2013) Sec. 8-8.409 Procedure for Termination of Two Percent (2%) Increase.

This Article providing for an increase of two percent (2%) to the existing utility users tax rate shall remain in effect until ended by the voters or repealed by the City Council. January 1, 2025, 71 pursuant to Section 8-8.318, or until such time as the Finance Commission, created pursuant to Title 2, Chapter 2, Article 6, determines that the City has met its goal of achieving long term financial stability with adequate financial reserves. Upon finding by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the City Council that the Finance Commission has adequately determined that the City has achieved long term financial stability with adequate financial reserves, the City Council shall enact legislation to reduce the UUT rate to six percent (6%), effective no later than one (1) year from date of passage. Notwithstanding this Section, the Council retains the independent authority to repeal the utility users tax pursuant to Section 8-8.317.

SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance, if approved by a majority of the voters of the City of Her cules at the General Municipal Election of November 8, 2022, shall become effective ten (10) days after the declaration of the results of that election by the City Council of the City of Hercules, pursuant to Elections Code section 9217.

SECTION 3. Publication. Within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof to be published or to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Hercules in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code section 36933.

SECTION 4. Codification. Upon adoption of this Ordinance pursuant to the voter approval referenced above, the City Clerk, in consultation with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized and directed to codify this Ordinance in the Hercules Municipal Code.

SECTION 5. City Council Amendments. The City Council of the City of Hercules may amend this Ordinance in any manner that does not increase the amount of tax any person would pay under this Chapter.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter. The City Council here by declares that it would have passed the Ordinance codified in this Chapter, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of this Chapter would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 7. Execution. The Mayor is hereby authorized to attest to the adoption of the Ordinance by the voters of the City by signing where indicated below.

It is hereby certified that the foregoing Ordinance No. ___ was APPROVED by the following vote of the People of the City of Hercules on November 8, 2022:

YES:

NO:

It is hereby further certified that the foregoing Ordinance No. ___ was adopted by Declaration of the November 8, 2022 election results by the City Council of the City of Hercules on, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:
72 ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED: ATTESTED:

__________________ __________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor Lauren Berges, City Clerk

73 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Lauren Berges, City Clerk

SUBJECT: Annual Local Commission Appointment List

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review and receive the Annual Local Commission Appointment List commonly referred to as the Maddy Act.

COMMISSION/SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:

There was no commission or subcommittee review of this item.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

DISCUSSION:

Government Code Section 54972 requires the legislative body to annually, on or before December 31, prepare and post a list of “all regular and ongoing boards, commissions, and committees which are appointed by the legislative body of the local agency, with the name of the incumbent appointee, the date of appointment, the date the term expires and the necessary qualifications for the position.” The list is attached for your review and information.

The City Council conducted a Special Meeting on November 9, 2022, to interview applicants who applied to the City’s Boards and Commissions and at this meeting made appointments to the Planning Commission, Finance Commission and Community and Library Services Commission.

The attached City of Hercules Appointment List will reflect the new appointments made by City Council at the Special City Council meeting held on November 9, 2022, and will be posted pursuant to GC section 54972 on or before December 31, 2022.

The at tached Appointment List will be posted on bulletin boards located at City Hall and the Community Center as required by law. In addition, the appointment list will be posted on the City website.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. City of Hercules Appointment List
74 Revised 12/13/2022

CITY OF HERCULES APPOINTMENT LIST
December 13, 2022

FINANCE COMMISSION COMMUNITY & LIBRARY SERVICES

COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION
Meets Bi-monthly on the 3rd Wednesday
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
Staff: Edwin Gato
Meet the 2nd Monday of every month at 7:00
p.m., in the Council Chambers
Staff: Christopher Roke
Meet the 1st and 3rd Mondays of every
month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council chambers
Staff: Tim Rood
Esselsagoe, Dennis 12/31/23
Appointed: 1/11/2022
Chen, Han
Appointed: 4/1/10
Reappointed: 11/9/2022 12/31/24
Dilli Bhattarai
Appointed: 11/9/2022
12/31/24
Dhillon-Flanagan, Barinder
Appointed: 11/9/2022 12/31/24

Yamamoto, D.

Appointed: 11/12/19
Reappointed: 11/9/2022
12/31/24
Morrison, Kenneth
Appointed: 3/26/13
Reappointed: 11/9/2022 12/31/24
Kingwood, Terrell
Appointed: 8/9/2022 12/31/23

Campbell-Miller, Brian
Appointed: 4/10/13
Reappointed: 11/9/2022 12/31/24
Rubio, Hector
Appointed: 4/15/15 12/31/23
Reappointed: 1/11/2022
Samson, Orit
Appointed: 11/19/2020
Reappointed:
12/31/22

Ward-Jackson, Evangelia
Appointed 5/15/15 12/31/23
Reappointed: 11/12/19
Schaufenbil, Robert
Appointed: 11/19/2020
Reappointed: 1/11/2022
12/31/23

Ulle, Edward
Appointed: 11/12/19 12/31/24
Reappointed: 11/09/2022

Student Commissioner
Solis, Haley
Appointed: 1/11/2022 12/31/2022
Reappointed:

Carol Most-Walker
Appointed: 11/9/2022
12/31/24

APPOINTMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL MAKES TO OUTSIDE AGENCIES

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
Doran, Jennifer
Appointed: 1/10/17
Reappointed: 11/9/2022
Term Expires: 12/31/2024

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY COMMISSION
Jo Ellen Marcotte
Appointed: 11/9/2022
Term Expires: 6/30/23

CCTA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
VACANT
Appointed:

Term Expires:

CONTRA COSTA MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL BOARD
Damien Wong
Appointed: 01/11/2022
Term Expires:12/31/23

In compliance with the requirements of the Maddy Act, Government Code 54970, the following commission, board and committee appointment list is posted on an annual basis by December 31. It shows all current members of commissions, boards and committees 75 Revised 12/13/2022

and the dates of their terms of office as of the time of this posting. Commissioners must be 18 years of age or older and residents of the City unless otherwise stated.

NOTE: The names on this list are subject to change based on term expirations and re signations that occur during the year. For a current list of members, please refer to the Commission Pages on the City’s website or call the City Clerk’s Office at 799-8215.
76 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Michael Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer

SUBJECT: Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement – Adjustment of Republic Services’ Rate +3.52% effective January 1, 2023

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a resolution approving Republic Services’ base year rate adjustment of +3.52% effective January 1, 2023, per the recommended order issued by the Public Works Director.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Following the process required by the Hercules Municipal Code, Republic Services’ solid wa ste franchise rate adjustment request was reviewed by the City’s consultants, R3, a noticed public hearing was convened by the Public Works Director on November 8, the Public Works Director’s report was forwarded to the City Manager, and the City Manager’s recommended order was reported out at the November 9 City Council meeting and the proposed rate increase of +3.52% was presented in detail.

The report triggered a 15-day objection period during which time no objections were received from the public. The proposed new rates are now coming before City Council for final approval, to be effective January 1, 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

Adjusting the rate +3.52% is in accordance with the established terms of the franchise agreement. It will change the collection fee for a residential customer using a 35-gallon garbage can, which is the service level chosen by residents approximately 85% of the time, from $29.29 to $30.32, an increase of $1.03 per month. The collection fee is just one component of the rates charged to solid waste rate payers – the complete set of fees for all service levels is shown in the Table below. The collection fee includes weekly collection of trash, organics and recycling as well as the provision of other community-wide progr ams. The proposed rate adjustment will also increase the franchise fee collected by the City by approximately $20K per year.

77 DISCUSSION:

In 1986 the City and Republic Services entered into a Franchise Agreement which provides Republic Services the exclusive right for solid waste collection and disposal services within Hercules. Since that time the Agreement has been amended multiple times. In accordance with Amendment No. 5, 2019 and 2023 are base years for rate review and adjustment. In other years the refuse collection rates are adjusted annually in accordance with the San Francisco -Oakland-San Jose Metropolitan Area Consumer Price Index (CPI).

On June 28, 2022 Republic Services submitted a base year rate adjustment request for +4.92% to be effective January 1, 2023 as provided for in Amendment No. 5. As described below, the rate increase recommended by consultants retained by the City is +3.52%.

The Rate Review Process. Under the rather complex rate adjustment procedure pursuant to Hercules Municipal Code Chapter 5-2A “Adjustment of Refuse Collection Rates”, the Public Works Director/City Engineer is required to review the rate increase request from Republic Services including completing any necessary studies and, after providing a 20-day notice, conduct a public hearing. The noticed public hearing is scheduled to take place on Monday, November 8. The findings and recommended action resulting from the Public Works Director/City Engineer’s public hearing are then compiled into a recommended order that is submitted to the City Manager, who will forward his final recommendation to the City Council. The final recommendation from the City Manager was presented to the City Council at the November 9th council meeting as a supplement to the agendized item. The recommendation must be presented to Council no sooner than 25 days from the rates going into effect. Submission of the findings and recommended action to the Council on November 9 th triggers a 15-day objection period to which 10 addition days are req uired to provide notice to the applicant (i.e. Republic Service), after which City Council at the regular meeting of December 13th can take final action on the rate setting after consideration of any comments or objections that were received during the 15-day objection period. No comments were received from the public during the 15-day objection period.

The submittal of the above described recommended order is coordinated with the rate increase being considered by RecycleMore (further discussion below) w hich administers the post-collection agreement (recycling) so that the City Council can evaluate the total cost increase to residents while considering the City collection component of the total rate increase.

Consultant’s Assistance. To be as cost-effective as possible and maximize available resources, Hercules jointly hired R3 Consulting Group Inc. (R3) along with Pinole and San Pablo, who are also undergoing base year rate adjustments, to perform a high level, desktop review for all 3 Cities. R3 is a Bay Area solid waste management consulting firm and satisfactorily completed the last rate reviews for Hercules back in 2013 and 2019 and has done business in the State of California for 20 years.

R3 reviewed Republic’s rate adjustment applications for 2023 with regard to mathematical accuracy, consistency with industry standards, allocations between franchise areas, and consistency with the franchise agreements. They are recommending a base rate adjustment for Hercules of +3.52% which includes meeting Republic’s established operating ratio of 0.88 under the franchise agreement. R3 subsequently confirmed the +3.52% adjustment with Republic, who has agreed with the findings.

This adjustment of +3.52% is lower than the most recent change in CPI, which is tracking at 5.7% as of August 2022.

78 The base rate adjustment of +3.52% recommended by R3 which would be effective January 1, 2013 and which has been agreed to by Republic Services is illustrated in the table below, and include both the collection rate pursuant to the City’s Agreement with Republic Services, and the post-collection rate pursuant to RecycleMore’s Post-Collection Agreement with Republic:

Rate Tables

2022 Base Year 2023 City 2023 2023
Collection Rate Adj Collection Waste Post-
Collection Monthly
Rate 3.52% Rate Program Charge
(Estimated)
TOTAL
(Estimated)
35-gallon $29.29 $1.03 $30.32 $2.08 $12.60 $45.00
65-gallon 50.52 1.78 52.30 3.79 23.42 79.51
95-gallon 71.85 2.53 74.38 5.60 35.15 115.13
20-gallon 28.25 0.99 29.24 1.40 7.18 37.82
Sr. 35-gal 27.29 1.03 28.32 2.03 12.60 42.95

2023 Commercial Collection Service Rates*
Bin Times per Week Size 1 2 3 4 5
1 Yard $316.99 $556.47 $796.13 $1,035.62 $1,275.27
2 Yard 526.57 964.20 1,401.80 1,839.42 2,276.86 3 Yard 723.63 1,347.96 1,971.86 2,595.76 3,219.67 4 Yard 914.04 1,719.10 2,523.99 3,328.88 4,133.71 5 Yard 1,100.90 2,084.22 3,067.35 4,050.67 5,033.81 6 Yard 1,285.81 2,446.28 3,607.16 4,767.82 5,928.69 7 Yard 1,469.45 2,807.66 4,146.05 5,484.27 6,822.47 *Includes $49.40 per yard/per month/per pick-up per week (RecycleMore IRRF Surcharge)

RecycleMore post-collection proposed Rate Changes. The rate tables also include fees for the City’s solid waste program and post -collection waste processing administered by RecycleMore.

RecycleMore is a joint powers agency in West County (and the City of Hercules is a member) and is charged with processing the waste stream once it has been collected, including recycling, composting, operating the solid waste transfer facility, and ensuring the region meets the State’s waste diversion requirements. On November 10, 2022 RecycleMore approved an increase to t heir post-collection processing rate for residential customers of 2.6%, which will increase the post-collection rate for 35- gallon residential customers by $0.32 per month. RecycleMore’s post-collection rates for commercial customers are projected to decrease by 8.1%.

79 The City’s solid waste program helps fund street maintenance and stormwater activities related to solid waste, such as street repairs due to the wear and tear of garbage trucks, removal of trash from streets and storm drains, and street sweeping to remove waste debris.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Public Works Director’s Recommended Order

2. November 9, 2022 Staff Report

Financial Impact
Description:

Increase the franchise fee collected by the City approximately $20K per year

Funding Source:

Budget Recap:

Total Estimated cost: $0 New Revenue: $20,000
Amount Budgeted: $0 Lost Revenue: $
New funding required: $0 New Personnel: $
Council Policy Change: Yes No

80 RESOLUTION NO. 22-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERCULES APPROVING REPUBLIC SERVICES’ BASE YEAR RATE ADJUSTMENT OF + 3.52% EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 20 23 PER THE RECOMMENDED ORDER ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC

WORKS DIRECTOR

WHEREAS, under the terms of the 5
th Amendment to the Franchise Agreement with
Republic Services, 2023 is designated as a base year for rate review and adjustment; and

WHEREAS, as stipulated by Municipal Code Chapter 5- 2A “Adjustment of Refuse Collection Rates” the Public Works Director has reviewed the rate adjustment request submitted by Republic, completed the necessary studies, conducted a public hearing, and subsequently issued the recommended order to increase Republic’s rates 3.52% effective January 1, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City Manager forwarded the recommended order to City Council with the recommendation to approve the 3.52% increase with the proposed rates shown below.

Rate Tables
Rates Shown Do Not Include RecycleMore’s Post-Collection Rate or City Waste Program

2022 Base Year 2023
Collection Rate Adj Collection
Rate 3.52% Rate
35-gallon $29.29 $1.03 $30.32
65-gallon 50.52 1.78 52.30
95-gallon 71.85 2.53 74.38
20-gallon 28.25 0.99 29.24
Sr. 35-gal 27.29 1.03 28.32

2023 Commercial Service Collection Rates
Bin Times per Week Size 1 2 3 4 5
1 Yard $267.59 $457.67 $647.93 $ 838.02 $1,028.27
2 Yard 427.77 766.60 1,105.40 1,444.22 1,782.86 3 Yard 575.43 1,051.56 1,527.26 2,002.96 2,478.67 4 Yard 716.44 1,323.90 1,931.19 2,538.48 3,145.71 5 Yard 853.90 1,590.22 2,326.35 3,062.67 3,798.81 6 Yard 989.41 1,853.48 2,717.96 3,582.22 4,446.69 7 Yard 1,123.65 2,116.06 3,108.65 4,101.07 5,093.47

WHEREAS, on November 9th, 2022 the City Council considered the information, evidence, and public testimony presented to them; and.
81 WHEREAS, no comments were received during the subsequent 15-day objection period.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules that the City Council hereby approves Republic Services’ base year rate adjus tment of + 3.52% effective January 1, 2023 per the recommended order issued by the Public Works Director.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the thirteen th day of December, 2022 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor

Lauren Burges, City Clerk

82 To: Dante Hall, City Manager
From: Michael Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer Re: Recommended Adjustments to the 2023 Refuse Collection Rates Date: November 9, 2022

In 1986 the City and Republic Services entered into a Franchise Agreement which provides Republic Services the exclusive right for collection and disposal services within Hercules. Since that time the Agreement has been amended multiple times. In accordance with Amendment No. 5, which was executed in 2013 and is the most recent, 2023 is a base year for rate review and adjustment. On other years the refuse collection rates are adjusted annually in accordance with the San Francisco-Oakland- San Jose Metropolitan Area Consumer Price Index (CPI).

On June 28, 2022 Republic Services submitted a base year rate adjustment request for +4.92% to be effective January 1, 2023 as provided for in Amendment No. 5. Under the Municipal Code Chapter 2A “Adjustment of Refuse Collection Rates”, the Public Works Director/City Engineer is required to review the rate increase request, including completing any necessary studies and conducting a public hearing.

The findings and recommended action are to be compiled and then submitted in a report to the City Manager. This memorandum serves as my report.

Delivery of municipal services can be divided into management/administration and field operations.

Rate reviews should include an evaluation of both. To be as cost effective as possible and maximize available resources, Hercules hired R3 to perform a high level, desktop review concurrently with the cities of Pinole and San Pablo. R3 is a Bay Area solid waste management consulting firm and satisfactorily completed the last rate review for Hercules back in 2013. R3 reviewed Republics rate adjustment applications for 2023 with regards to mathematical accuracy, consistency with industry standards, allocations between franchise areas, and consistency with the Franchise Agreements. They are recommending a base rate adjustment for Hercules of +3.52%, which they discussed with Republic, and Republic has agreed to use (See attached correspondence). This adjustment is less than the most recent CPI, which is tracking at 5.7%, and can be attributed to higher labor costs, gasoline prices, and truck costs.

I conducted a public hearing regarding the proposed rate increase at on Tuesday, November 8 as required by the Municipal Code. No members of the public attended. I have worked fairly closely with Republic, previously toured their facilities, and generally found their operations to be efficient and reliable.

Based upon these reports, findings and observations, I am recommending Republic Services’ base rate adjustment be set at +3.52% to be effective January 1, 2023.

CITY OF HERCULES
111 CIVIC DRIVE, HERCULES CA 94547
PHONE: (510) 799-8200
83 84

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Special Meeting of November 9, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Michael Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer

SUBJECT: Solid Waste Collection Franchise Agreement – Preliminary Recommendation to Adjust Republic Services’ Rate +3.52% effective January 1, 2023

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive the Recommendation of the City Manager regarding the Public Works Director’s report and recommended order following his November 8, 2022 Public Hearing on Republic Services’ request for a base year rate adjustment of +3.52% effective January 1, 2023.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Following the process required by the Hercules Municipal Code, Republic Services’ solid waste franchise rate adjustment request was reviewed by the City’s consultants, R3, a noticed public hearing was convened by the Public Works Director on November 8, the Public Works Director’s report was forwarded to the City Manager, and the City Manager’s recommended order will be reported out at the City Council meeting tonight. This report to the City Council tonight will trigger a 15 -day objection period, with final approval of any proposed new rates to come before the Council at the December 13, 2022 Council meeting. Any approved rate adjustments would go into effect January 1, 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

Adjusting the rate +3.52% is in accordance with the established terms of the franchise agreement. It will change the collection fee for a residential customer using a 35-gallon garbage can, which is the service level chosen by residents approximately 85% of the time, from $29.29 to $30.32, an increase of $1.03 per month. The collection fee is just one component of the rates charged to solid waste rate payers – the complete set of fees for all service levels is shown in the Table below. The collection fee includes weekly collectio n of trash, organics and recycling as well as the provision of other community-wide programs. The proposed rate adjustment will also increase the franchise fee collected by the City by approximately $20K per year.
85 DISCUSSION:

In 1986 the City and Republic Services entered into a Franchise Agreement which provides Republic Services the exclusive right for solid waste collection and disposal services within Hercules. Since that time the Agreement has been amended multiple times. In accordance with Amendment No. 5, 2019 and 2023 are base years for rate review and adjustment. In other years the refuse collection rates are adjusted annually in accordance with the San Francisco -Oakland-San Jose Metropolitan Area Consumer Price Index (CPI).

On June 28, 2022 Republic Services submitted a base year rate adjustment request for +4.92% to be effective January 1, 2023 as provided for in Amendment No. 5. As described below, the rate increase recommended by consultants retained by the City is +3.52%.

The Rate Review Process. Under the rather complex rate adjustment procedure pursuant to Hercules Municipal Code Chapter 5-2A “Adjustment of Refuse Collection Rates”, the Public Works Director/City Engineer is required to review the rate incre ase request from Republic Services including completing any necessary studies and, after providing a 20-day notice, conduct a public hearing. The noticed public hearing is scheduled to take place on Monday, November 8. The findings and recommended action resulting from the Public Works Director/City Engineer’s public hearing are then compiled into a recommended order that is submitted to the City Manager, who will forward his final recommendation to the City Council. The final recommendation from the City Manager will be presented to the City Council at the November 9th council meeting as a supplement to the agendized item. The recommendation must be presented to Council no sooner than 25 days from the rates going into effect. Submission of the findings and recommended action to the Council on November 9th triggers a 15-day objection period to which 10 addition days are required to provide notice to the applicant (i.e. Republic Service), after which City Council at the regular meeting of December 13th can take final action on the rate setting after consideration of any comments or objections that were received during the 15-day objection period.

The submittal of the above described recommended order is coordinated with the rate increase being considered b y RecycleMore (further discussion below) which administers the post collection agreement (recycling) so that the City Council can evaluate the total cost increase to residents while considering the City collection component of the total rate increase.

Consultant’s Assistance. To be as cost effective as possible and maximize available resources, Hercules jointly hired R3 Consulting Group Inc. (R3) along with Pinole and San Pablo, who are also undergoing base year rate adjustments, to perform a high level, desktop review for all 3 Cities. R3 is a Bay Area solid waste management consulting firm and satisfactorily completed the last rate reviews for Hercules back in 2013 and 2019 and has done business in the State of California for 20 years.

R3 reviewed Republic’s rate adjustment applications for 2023 with regards to mathematical accuracy, consistency with industry standards, allocations between franchise areas, and consistency with the franchise agreements. They are recommending a base rate adjustment for Hercules of +3.52% which includes meeting Republic’s established operating ratio of 0.88 under the franchise agreement. R3 subsequently confirmed the +3.52% adjustment with Republic, who has agreed with the findings.

This adjustment of +3.52% is lower than the most recent change in CPI, which is tracking at 5.7% as of August 2022.

86 The base rate adjustment of +3.52% recommended by R3 which would be effective January 1, 2013 and which has been agreed to by Republic Services is illustrated in the table below:

Rate Tables

2022 Base Year 2023 City 2023 2023
Collection Rate Adj Collection Waste Post-
Collection Monthly
Rate 3.52% Rate Program Charge
(Estimated)
TOTAL
(Estimated)
35-gallon $29.29 $1.03 $30.32 $2.08 $12.85 $45.25
65-gallon 50.52 1.78 52.30 3.79 23.89 79.98
95-gallon 71.85 2.53 74.38 5.60 35.85 115.83
20-gallon 28.25 0.99 29.24 1.40 7.32 37.96
Sr. 35-gal 27.29 1.03 28.32 2.03 12.85 43.20

2023 Commercial Collection Service Rates
Bin Times per Week Size 1 2 3 4 5
1 Yard $267.59 $457.67 $647.93 $ 838.02 $1,028.27
2 Yard 427.77 766.60 1,105.40 1,444.22 1,782.86 3 Yard 575.43 1,051.56 1,527.26 2,002.96 2,478.67 4 Yard 716.44 1,323.90 1,931.19 2,538.48 3,145.71 5 Yard 853.90 1,590.22 2,326.35 3,062.67 3,798.81 6 Yard 989.41 1,853.48 2,717.96 3,582.22 4,446.69 7 Yard 1,123.65 2,116.06 3,108.65 4,101.07 5,093.47 *Does not include separate per yard/per month/per pick-up per week (RecycleMore IRRF Surcharge)

RecycleMore post-collection proposed Rate Changes. The rate tables also include fees for the City’s solid waste program and post -collection waste processing administered by RecycleMore.

RecycleMore is a joint powers agency in West County (and the City of Hercules is a member) and is charged with processing the waste stream once it has been collected, including recycling, composting, operating the solid waste transfer facility, and ensuring the region meets the State’s waste diversion requirements. On November 10, 2022 RecycleMore is scheduled to consider an increase to their post- collection processing rate for residential customers of 4.6%, which would increase the post-collection rate for 35-gallon residential customers by $0.57 per month. RecycleMore’s post-collection rates for commercial customers are projected to decrease by 6.3%. 87 The City’s solid waste program helps fund street maintenance and storm water activities related to solid waste, such as street repairs due to the wear and tear of garbage trucks, removal of trash from streets and storm drains, and street sweeping to remove waste debris.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Public Works Director’s Recommended Order (To be provided at the meeting)

Financial Impact
Description:

Increase the franchise fee collected by the City approximately $20K per year

Funding Source:

Budget Recap:

Total Estimated cost: $0 New Revenue: $20,000
Amount Budgeted: $0 Lost Revenue: $
New funding required: $0 New Personnel: $
Council Policy Change: Yes No

88 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Michael Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer

SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers in the amount of $284,000 for Engineering Support Services during Construction for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Carollo Engineers for a not to exceed amount of $284,000 for Engineering Support Services during construction for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

This project was identified in the 2008 Sewer Master Plan along with other sewer system improvements. In anticipation of the associated cost, sewer rates were subsequently increased, wastewater revenue bonds were issued, and impact fees were collected from developers to generate the needed funding. As a result of this advanced financial planning, there is sufficient funding in the Sewer Fund to cover the cost of this contract, which is included in the adopted FY 22-23 Budget.

The contract amount of $284,000 is based upon 2% of the engineer’s construction estimate of $14.2M, which is in the lower percentage range for engineering support. Additionally, the project is complex.

Should additional funding be needed in the future, a contract amendment can be brought back to Council for consideration along with a report of current and future anticipated expenditures. Work will be performed on a time and materials basis.

DISCUSSION:

This project will replace 5,500 feet of the City’s primary 24-inch trunk sewer main with 30-inch piping, beginning at Duck Pond Park and ending at the influent intake to the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Pinole. The trunk sewer was constructed in 1972 and has exceeded its useful service life, is deteriorating, and needs to be increased in size to convey the flows from future development.

89 The design for this project was completed by Carollo under a separate contract and is fairly complex.

The pipeline alignment includes tunneling under the railroad tracks, a siphon crossing under Pinole Creek, realignment down Camden Avenue (a private street), depths of 35+ feet deep, and a variable water table with changing soils.

Retaining the design firm to provide support during construction is a standard practice and ensures that the City is responsive to the contractor should design issues arise due to unforeseen, underground conditions during the course of construction . Carollo will also be responding to Requests For Information, reviewing submittals, providing support on permitting, and other miscellaneous tasks as needed.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Consultant Agreement including Carollo letter proposal dated December 6, 2022.

Financial Impact
Description: Expenditure amount not to exceed $284,000.

Funding Source: Sewer Fund. Fund No. 420-5990-642.05-00

Budget Recap:

Total Estimated cost: $284,000 New Revenue: $
Amount Budgeted: $284,000 Lost Revenue: $
New funding required: $0 New Personnel: $
Council Policy Change: Yes No

90 RESOLUTION NO. 22-

RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF HERCULES

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH

CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES DURING

CONSTRUCTION FOR THE SYCAMORE AVENUE SEWE R TRUNK

REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DUCK POND PARK TO TH E WASTE WATER

TREATMENT PLANT

WHEREAS, the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project will be under construction shortly; and

WHEREAS, Carollo Engineering was selected for and completed the design for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project; and

WHEREAS, retaining the design firm to provide engineering support during construction is standard practice and e nsures the City can be responsive should design issues arise due to unforeseen, underground conditions and to respond to reques ts for information, review submittals, and provide permitting support; and

WHEREAS, the contract is fully funded with Sewer Funds that were included in the adopted FY 22-23 Budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules that the City Council hereb y authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with Carollo Engineers for a not to exceed amount of $284,000 for Engineering Support Services during construction for the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Trunk Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the thirteenth day of December, 2022 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

____________________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Lauren Berges, City Clerk
91 2795 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, California 94598
P. 925.932.1710 F. 925.930.0208

A. | Proposal for Sycamore Ave Trunk Sewer Replacment ESDC.docx December $, &&&

Mr. Mike Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Hercules
 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA -./
Subject: Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project – Proposal for Engineering Services During Construction
Dear Mr. Roberts:

We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide engineering services during construction for the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project (Project).

The Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Project is an important project for the City. This Project improves system capacity and reliability of the City’s trunk sewer that conveys the City’s wastewater to the Pinole Wastewater Treatment Plant. This is a complex project requiring multiple construction methods, tight construction corridors, compliance with multiple environmental permits, coordination with multiple jurisdictions and with the public at large.

The engineer’s estimate for this project is 8.& million. Actual cost will be dependent on contractor bids.

The industry standard for the cost of engineering services ranges from & to . percent depending on the project complexity. Based on the complexity of this project, the cost for engineering services is anticipated to be .. percent of the construction cost. However, based on communications with the City, this proposal is for & percent, or 8&:,, with the understanding that the contract can be increased in the future as needed to meet the needs of the project. The actual cost will be based on time and materials with City authorization to proceed occurring ahead of incurring costs. Actual cost will be based on the following rates:
• Project Manager/Principal in Charge 8&/hr
• Senior Structural Engineer 8&-/hr
• Project Engineer 8&$/hr
• Lead Structural Engineer 8&/hr
• Lead Engineer 8&&/hr
• Staff Engineer 8:/hr
• CAD Drafter 8-./hr
• Document Processor 8./hr
If you have any questions or would like to discuss further, please contact me at (-&.) -//‐- or [email protected].

92 Mr. Mike Roberts
City of Hercules
December $, &&&

Page &

carollo.com
Sincerely,

CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.

Anne E. Prudhel, P.E.

Vice President/Project Manager

AP:ap

cc: File

93 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Michael Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer

SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to Cratus for the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project – Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plant

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Cratus Inc. in the amount of $11,615,866 for the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the Wastewater Treatment Plan t, authorizing an additional expenditure of up to $1,161,587 for a 10% contingency on said construction contract, for a total not to exceed contract amount of $12,777,453.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

The proposed budget for the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project is as follows:

Revenues:

Sewer Fund $12,777,453
Total Revenue $12,777,453

Expenditures:

Construction Contract $11,615,866
10% Contingency $1,161,587
Total Expenditures $12,777,453

This project was identified in the 2008 Sewer Master Plan along with other sewer system improvements. In anticipation of the associated cost, sewer rates were subsequently increased, wastewater revenue bonds were issued, and impact fees were collected from developers to generate the needed funding. As a result of this advanced financial planning, there is sufficient funding in the Sewer Fund to cover the cost of this contract, which is included in the adopted FY 22-23 Budget.

94 DISCUSSION:

The Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project was advertised for bids in the West County Times on November 1 & 8, 2022 and in 5 regional plan rooms. A total of 6 bids were received at the bid opening deadline of 2pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2022. Upon opening and reviewing the 6 bids received, Cratus Inc submitted the low bid in the amount of $11,615,866, which was determined to be responsive.

Cratus Inc is based in San Francisco, has been in business for 9 years, and has broad underground sewer pipeline experience on public works projects, including in San Francisco. Their references and bid were thoroughly checked. Cratus was determined to be a responsible bidder.

This project will replace 5,500 feet of the City’s primary 24 -inch trunk sewer main with 30 -inch piping, beginning at Duck Pond Park and ending at the influent intake to the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Pinole. The trunk sewer was constructed in 1972 and has exceeded its useful service life, is deteriorating, and needs to be increased in size to convey the flows from future development.

This underground pipe project is located within a developed footprint and has many cha llenging design features. The pipeline alignment includes tunneling under the railroad tracks, a siphon crossing under Pinole Creek, realignment down Camden Avenue (a private street), depths of 35+ feet deep, and a variable water table with changing soils.

Construction is anticipated to take approximately a year and the start date will be dependent upon availability of materials. Following the award of the construction contract, staff will meet with the contractor to firm up the schedule.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Sycamore Ave Trunk Sewer Replacement Project – Location Map Location Map Bidder's Name Bid Proposal
1 CRATUS, INC. $ 11,615,886.00
2 MITCHELL ENGINEERING $ 13,116,807.00
3 JMB CONSTRUCTION, INC. $ 13,128,012.00
4 ARGONAUT CONSTRUCTORS $ 13,471,840.00
5 MOUNTAIN CASCADE, INC. $ 13,781,104.00
6 RANGER PIPELINES, INC. $ 13,815,675.00
95 Financial Impact
Description: Expenditure amount not to exceed $12,777,453

Funding Source:

Sewer Fund. Fund No. 420-5990-642.05-00 $12,777,453

Budget Recap:

Total Estimated cost: $12,777,453 New Revenue: $
Amount Budgeted: $12,777,453 Lost Revenue: $
New funding required: $ New Personnel: $
Council Policy Change: Yes No

96 RESOLUTION NO. 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERCULES AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION CONTR ACT WITH CRATUS INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 11,615,866 FOR THE SYCAMORE AVENUE TRUNK S EWER REPLACEMENT

PROJECT - DUCK POND PARK TO THE W ASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, AUTHORIZING AN ADDITIONAL EXPENDIT URE OF UP TO $ 1,161,587 FOR A 10% CONTINGEN CY ON SAID

CONSTRUCTION CONTRAC T, FOR A TOTAL NOT TO E XCEED CONTRACT AMOUN T OF $12,777,453

WHEREAS, the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Rep lacement Project was advertised for bids in the West County Times on November 1 and 8, 2022 and in 5 regional plan rooms; and

WHEREAS, a total of 6 bids were received at the bid opening deadline of 2pm on Tuesday, December 6 and upon opening and reviewing th e 6 bids received, Cratus Inc. submitted the low bid in the amount of $11,615,866; and

WHEREAS, Cratus has been determined to be a responsible bidder and their bid has been determined to be responsive; and

WHEREAS, there is sufficient funding in the Adopted FY 20 22-23 Budget to fully fund the construction contract.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules that the City Council hereby adopts a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract wit h Cratus Inc. in the amount of $ 11,615,866 for the Sycamore Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement Project - Duck Pond Park to the W astewater Treatment Plan t, authorizing an additional expenditure of up to $ 1,161,587 for a 10% contingency on said construction contract, for a total not to exceed contract amount of $12,777,453.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the 13th day of December 2022 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

____________________________
Dion Bailey, Mayor

ATTEST:

Lauren Berges, City Clerk
97 SYCAMORE SEWER TRUNK REPLACEMENT PROJECT

DUCK POND PARK TO THE PINOLE/HERCULES WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 98 PROCLAMATION

COMMENDING THE LEADERSHIP OF MAYO R DION BAILEY AND

HIS DEDICATION TO THE HERCULES COMMUNITY

WHEREAS, Dion Bailey was first elected to the Hercules City Council in November 2018; and

WHEREAS, in December 2021, Vice Mayor Bailey was appointed to serve as Mayor as part of the annual City Council reorganization; and

WHEREAS, during his tenure, Mayor Bailey has proudly represented Hercules at meetings of the Contra Costa Mayor’s Conference and is a member of the West County Mayors and Supervisors’ Association; he represented the City as the Chair of the West Contra Costa Transit Authority (WestCAT) and he was an alternate on the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC); Mayor Bailey is the Chair of the Hercules Traffic and Public Safety Subcommittee and the Hercules Economic Development Subcommittee; and

WHEREAS, under Mayor Bailey’s leadership, the City Councils accomplishments include continued financial sustainability delivering a balanced budget as well as a projected budget surplus; in an ongoing effort to move the Waterfront Master Plan forward, he has diligently worked with other mayors in the region to identify strategies to secure future ferry service and is committed to obtaining grant funding; voted to approve traffic calming projects in high-speed areas, such as John Muir Parkway and Village Parkway neighborhood ; he worked with local, regional, state and federal partners to secure grant funding for projects; worked with State Senator Nancy Skinner’s staff to secure an $8 million dollar state budget allocation for Hercules, which may be used for grant-matching projects and improvements in town; in his commitment to clean energy initiatives, he voted to approve the “All -Electric” Ordinance which aligns the City with Contra Costa County Building Codes and state law; development projects approved during his first term include Sa feway, DR Horton, Hilltown/Hillcrest, Wheel Works and LedCor Blocks M,O and P; and

WHEREAS, Mayor Bailey is actively involved in supporting the community, local organizations and local businesses; he has supported Friends of the Hercules Library and Hercules Education Foundation(HEF); post pandemic he supported the re -opening of community facilities and reinstating community service; he voted to approve the Hercules “Shop Local” program, funded with American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding ; he approve d funding to support community events which included partnering with the City of Pinole to fund a 4 th of July Fireworks event; along with other events like, National Night Out, Hercules Trunk or Treat, Holiday Tree Lighting, and Movies in the Park; and

99 WHEREAS, Mayor Bailey’s leadership and service have contributed to an enhanced reputation for the City of Hercules throughout the region and the continued support of our residents for City programs and activities due to the City Council’s commitment to transparency and open government.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED that I, Alexander Walker- Griffin, Vice Mayor of the City of Hercules, on behalf of the entire City Council, do hereby commend Dion Bailey for his leadership as Mayor and acknowledge his dedication to the Hercules community.

In witness whereof, I hereunto set my hand and cause the seal of the City of Hercules to be affixed this 13th day of December 2022.

Alex Walker-Griffin, Vice Mayor
100

Certificate of Election and
Oath of Office

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Contra Costa } ss.

I, Lauren Berges, City Clerk of the

CITY OF HERCULES
in the State of California, do hereby certify, that a General Municipal Election was held in the City of Hercules on the 8th Day of November 2022, and at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13th day of December, 2022

DION BAILEY
was officially declared elected to the office of

MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
as shown by the official returns of the election, and the statement of votes cast now on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Witness my hand and official seal this 13th day of December 2022.

By _______________________________________
(ELECTION OFFICIAL))

OATH OF OFFICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Contra Costa } ss.

I, ________________________________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

Member of the City Council
(TITLE OF OFFICE)

__________________________________________
(CANDIDATE SIGNATURE)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ______________ day of _______________, 20_______.

__________________________________________
(SIGNATURE OF PERSON ADMINISTERING OATH)
__________________________________________
(Title)
101

Certificate of Election and
Oath of Office

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Contra Costa } ss.

I, Lauren Berges, City Clerk of the

CITY OF HERCULES
in the State of California, do hereby certify, that a General Municipal Election was held in the City of Hercules on the 8th Day of November 2022, and at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 13th day of December, 2022

CHRIS KELLEY
was officially declared elected to the office of

MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
as shown by the official returns of the election, and the statement of votes cast now on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Witness my hand and official seal this 13th day of December 2022.

By _______________________________________
(ELECTION OFFICIAL))

OATH OF OFFICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of Contra Costa } ss.

I, ________________________________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

Member of the City Council
(TITLE OF OFFICE)

__________________________________________
(CANDIDATE SIGNATURE)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ______________ day of _______________, 20_______.

__________________________________________
(SIGNATURE OF PERSON ADMINISTERING OATH)
__________________________________________
(Title)
102

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Lauren Berges, City Clerk

SUBJECT: Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council to Nominate and Appoint a Mayor and Vice-Mayor.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

DISCUSSION:

Section 4.8 of the Council Rules of Procedure provides for the procedure of selecting the Mayor and Vice-Mayor.

4.8 City Council Leadership and Expectations : It is the policy and practice of the City Council that each year the City Council shall select a Mayor and Vice May or. For every election cycle, the City Council Members receiving the highest and the second highest number of votes will be identified. These City Council Members shall be selected by the City Council to rotate into the position of Mayor during the third and fourth year of their terms respectively.

The Council Member receiving the highest number of votes shall serve as Mayor during the third year of his/her term and the Council Member receiving the second highest number of votes shall serve in the fourth year of his/her term. The herein selection process shall be followed in all instances unless a Council Member is denied the honor of serving as Mayor or Vice Mayor pursuant to subsection 4.8.4.

The two highest vote getters in the 2018 Election were Chris Kelley with 5,152 votes and Dion Bailey with 3,739 votes.

The two highest vote getters in the 2020 Election were Alex Walker-Griffin with 6,172 votes and Dan Romero with 5,824 votes.

The two highest vote getters in the 2022 Election were Dion Bailey with 5,784 votes and Chris Kelley with 4,246 votes.
103

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Council Rules of Procedure

104

CITY COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Authority

2. General Rules

3. Types of Meetings

4. Chairperson and Duties

5. Order of Business and Agenda

6. Ordinances

7. Creation of Committees, Boards and Commissions

8. Citizens’ Rights

9. Regional Appointments

10. Amendments

11. Rules of Conduct

12. Legislative Process and Taking Positions
105
CO

UNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE

HISTORY OF ADOPTION AND AMENDMENTS

Resolution No. Date Amendment

Resolution No. 17-068 9/26/17 Adoption of Rules after Review of all Sections

Resolution No. 18-004 1/23/18 Amendment to Section 3.7

Resolution No. 18-017 4/10/18 Added Section 12
106

1. Authority

1.1 General Law City: General Law of the State of California provides that the City of Hercules City Council may determine its own rules of procedure. The following set of rules shall be in effect upon their adoption by the Council and until such time as they are amended or new rules adopted in the manner provided by these rules.

1.1 Related Documents: This procedures manual provides a summary of important aspects of City Council activities. However, it cannot incorporate all material and information necessary for undertaking the business of a city council. Many other laws, policies, plans, and documents exist which guide the City Council. Related documents:

1.2.1 Hercules Municipal Code

1.2.2 Hercules Conflict of Interest Resolution

1.2.3 Hercules Ethics Policy Resolution

1.2.4 Hercules Anti-Nepotism Ordinance

1.2.5 Hercules Zoning Ordinance

1.2.6 Hercules General Plan and Specific Plans

1.2.7 California Constitution and Laws

1.2.8 California Open Meeting Laws (The Ralph M. Brown Act)

1.2.9 California Political Reform Act

1.2.10 United States Constitution and Laws

2. General Rules

2.1 Meetings to be Public : All official meetings of the Council shall be open to the public, except where State or local l aw allows Closed Sessions for certain limited topics. The minutes from open session shall be open to public inspection in accordance with the provisions of the State of California Open Meetings Law (Ralph M. Brown Act). Recordings of City Council Meetings shall be retained as per the requirements of the City’s adopted Retention Schedule.

2.2. Quorum : Three members of the Council shall constitute a quorum and be necessary for the transaction of business. If a quorum is not present, those in attendance will be named and they shall adjourn to a later time.

2.3 Compelling Attendance : City Councilmembers are expected to attend all scheduled meetings. If absence is unavoidable, the City Manager, City Clerk, or Mayor shall be notified.

2.4 Teleconferencing: Pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act provisions pertaining to meeting requirements as amended from time to time, remote attendance may be allowed in connection with any meeting within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. All votes taken during a teleconferenced meeting shall be by roll call. At least a quorum of the Council must participate from teleconferencing locations within the city’s jurisdiction. Each teleconference location must be identified in the notice and agenda of the meeting. Agendas must be posted at 107
each
teleconference location, and each location must be accessible to the public. The agenda must provide the opportunity for the public to address the legislative body directly at each teleconference location.

2.5 Council Meeting Minutes: Minutes of all proceedings of the Council shall be kept by the City Clerk and shall be entered in a book constituting part of the official record of the Council.

2.6 Ordinances: An ordinance is limited to one topic, which shall be clearly stated in its title, except for an appropriations ordinance, an ordinance adopting or embodying an administrative or governmental code, or an ordinance adopting a code of ordinances.

2.7 City Manager: The City Manager shall attend all meetings of the Council unless excused by the Mayor with the consent of the Council. The City Manager shall designate at his/her discretion, staff representatives to Subcommittees and Commission meetings.

2.8 City Attorney: The City Attorney shall attend all regular mee tings of the Council unless excused by the Mayor with the consent of the Council and shall attend special meetings and Council workshops upon request. The City Attorney shall also attend meetings of the City Commissions at the request of the City Council or on an as -needed basis. The City Attorney shall act as the Council’s parliamentarian.

The City Attorney shall render legal opinions, either written or oral, on questions of law.

Individual members of the City Council may consult with the City Attorney regarding legal issues pertaining to City business, and may request written legal advice regarding a potential conflict of interest which may affect that council member’s ability to participate in an upcoming decision.

All City Attorney responses to council member legal inquiries requiring a substantial commitment of City Attorney time must be provided in writing to all members of the City Council. A ll staff legal inquiries requiring a substantial commitment of City Attorney time must be authorized by the City Manager.

The City Attorney should do no work on a policy proposal from one or more members of the Council that would require a substantial commitment of City Attorney time when the consideration of such a proposal has not been discussed by the full Council.

2.9 City Clerk : The City Clerk or his/her delegate shall attend all meetings of the Council unless excused by the City Manager and shall keep the official minutes and perform such other duties as may be requested by the Council.

2.10 Officers and Employees: Department Directors of the City, when there is pertinent business from their departments on the Council agenda, shall attend such Council meetings upon direction from the City Manager.

2.11 Rules of Order: The latest authorized edition of “Roberts Rules of Order” shall be adopted and govern the proceedings of Council Meetings where they are not in conflict with these rules. 108

2.12 Rules of Debate:

2.12.1 Mayor May Debate: The Mayor may debate from the chair, subject only to such limitations of debate as are imposed on all members, and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and privileges as a member of the Council by reason of that person serving as Mayor.

2.12.2 Getting the Floor - Improper References to be avoided : A member desi ring to speak shall address the Chair, who is in most instances the Mayor, and upon recognition by the presiding officer, shall confine comments to the question under debate. Subject to the discretion of the Chair, the order for Council comment is for the Council Members to be recognized first, followed by the Vice Mayor, and lastly, the Mayor.

2.12.3 Interruptions : A member, once recognized by the chair, shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it is to call a member to order, or as herein otherwise provided. If a member, while speaking, were called to order, that member shall cease speaking until the question of order is determined, and, if in order, the member shall be permitted to proceed.

2.12.4 Motion to Reconsider: A motion to reconsider any action taken by the Council may be made either during the same session, or at a recessed or adjourned session thereof. Such motion must be made and seconded by one of the prevailing sides, and may be made at any time and have precedence over all other motions or while a member has the floor; it shall be debatable.

Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Council or the City Manager or City Attorney from reconsidering at a subsequent meeting an action previously taken by the Council, upon a showing of changed circumstances or on the basis of new information, as long as the matter is properly agendized for discussion.

3. Types of Meetings

3.1 Regular Meeting : The Council shall meet in the Council Chambers for Regular and Adjourned meetings. Regular Council Meetings are to commence at 7:00 p.m., on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month, unless otherwise specified at least two (2) weeks in advance.

No Council meeting will be held in the event that a regular meeting of the Council falls on a City observed/recognized holiday.

3.2 Special Meetings: Special meetings may be called by the Mayor or by a majority of the members of the Council. The call for a special meeting shall be filed with the City Clerk in written form, which should be si gned by the Mayor or those members calling for a special meeting except that an announcement of a special meeting during any regular meeting at which all members are present shall be sufficient notice of such special meeting. The call for a special meeting shall specify the day, the hour, and the location of the special meeting, shall list the subject or subjects to be considered, and shall be delivered to each member of the Council, to each media outlet requesting notice, and posted on the City’s local Internet Web site. It is the policy of the City of Hercules that when possible, 72 hour notice be provided for special 109
m
eetings but in no event shall notice be less than 24 hours. Only such business may be transacted at a special meeting as may be listed in the call for said meeting or an incident thereto.

3.3 Emergency Meetings: An emergency meeting may be called pursuant to the requirements of the Brown Act as amended from time to time, when a majority of the legislative body determines that an emergency situation exists. At least one hour prior to the meeting, telephonic notice must be provided to all Council Members as well as all media outlets, which have requested that they receive notice of special meetings called pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.5, except in the case of a “dire emergency” as defined in California Government Code Sec. 54956.5(a)(2).

Emergency meetings may be held in closed session as the Government Code allows.

3.4 Adjourned Meetings: Any meeting of the Council may be adj ourned to a later date and time, provided that no adjournment shall be for a longer period than until the next Regular Meeting.

3.5 Workshops : The Council may meet informally in Workshops (open to the public), at the call of the Mayor or a majority of th e Council. Any workshop shall be noticed and conducted in the same manner as a R egular Council meeting. A workshop is for discussion only; no action can be taken by the Council.

3.6 Closed Sessions: Closed Sessions or closed meetings may only be held in ac cordance with the exceptions to open meeting requirements contained in the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act. Topics that may be discussed include: (1) personnel matters, (2) c onsideration of price and terms of payment related to the acquisition of property for public purposes or the sale or lease of public property, (3) potential or pending litigation in which the City has an interest.

3.7 Adjournment of Meetings: All regular City Council Meetings shall end no later than 11:30 p.m. with no new business beginning after 11:00 p.m. except that Future Agenda Item requests may be made and discussed after 11:00 p.m. An Agenda item which has commenced consideration before 11:00 p.m. shall be completed prior to adjournment. Upon completion of that item, the meeting shall be adjourned. Any matter appearing on the Agenda of a meeting which is adjourned prior to being considered will be placed on the Agenda of the next regular meeting.

4. Chairperson and Duties

4.1 Chairperson: The Chair of City Council meetings shall be the Mayor and in his/her absence, the Vice Mayor. In the absence of both the Mayor and the Vice Mayor, the Council Member with seniority based on continuous service shall act as the temporary Chair. City Council S ub- committees and Commissions shall elect a Chair and Vice Chair annually.

4.2 Call to Order : The Mayor shall call the meetings of the Council to order or by the Vice Mayor in his/her absence. In the absence of both, the senior Council Member based on continuous service who shall act as the temporary Chair shall call the meeting to order.

110

4.3 Preservation of Order : The Mayor shall preserve order and decorum among Council Members; prevent attacks on personalities or the impugning of members’ motives, and confine members in debate to the question under discussion.

4.4 Points of Order: By tradition, the Mayor speaks last during discussion of an agenda item.

The Mayor shall determine all points of order, subject to the right of any member to request a vote of the entire City Council on the questions whether the determination of the Mayor should be sustained.

4.5 Questions to be stated: The Mayor shall re- state all questions submitted for a vote and announce the result. A roll call vote shall be taken upon the request of any member.

4.6 Substitution for Chairperson: The Mayor may call on the Vice Mayor to temporarily chair the meeting to cover a temporary absence. Such substitution should not continue beyond adjournment.

4.7 Rights of Council to Discipline: A deliberate bod y has the inherent right to make and enforce its own rules and laws , including rules providing for the discipline of a member of the deliberative body.

The City Council shall have a right to discipline, admonish, and censure a member where a standard majority of the Council finds that actions of a member are detrimental to the City of Hercules. Such discipline, after the Council duly notices and publicly conducts a hearing, can include admonishment and in more serious cases, public censure. As a rule, the City Council has no right to go beyond what is necessary for its self-protection.

4.8 City Council Leadership and Expectations : It is the policy and practice of the City Council that each year the City Council shall select a Mayor and Vice Mayor. For every election cycle, the City Council Members receiving the highest and the second highest number of votes will be identified. These City Council Members shall be selected by the City Council to rotate into the position of Mayor during the third and fourth year of their terms respectively. The Council Member receiving the highest number of votes shall serve as Mayor during the third year of his/her term and the Council Member receiving the second highest number of votes shall serve in the fourth year of his/her term. The herein selection process shall be followed in all instances unless a Council Member is denied the honor of serving as Mayor or Vice Mayor pursuant to subsection 4.8.4.

4.8.1 Inability to Serve as Mayor or Vice Mayor: In the event of a death or removal from office, the City Council shall determine who shall serve as the Mayor or Vice Mayor for the term vacated based upon the rotation described in 4.8 above.

4.8.2 Appointment of Vice Mayor to Mayor: Upon completion of term as Vice Mayor, City Council shall appoint the Vice Mayor as Mayor for a term of one (1) year.

111

4.8.3 Declining Position of Mayor or Vice Mayor : If a Council Member declines to accept the position of Mayor or Vice Mayor pursuant to the selection process in this Section

4.8, then the City Clerk will request alternative nominations for Mayor and/or Vice Mayor from the Council. A Council Member nominated by this process must receive confirmation by a majority of the Council Members to serve in the capacity of Mayor or Vice Mayor.

4.8.4 Vote of No Confidence: A Council Member may be denied the honor of serving as Mayor or Vice Mayor by the Council upon a unanimous vote of no confidence by the rest of the Council based on a serious offense or violation of the law that reflects negatively on t he City and its residents.

4.8.5 Mayor’s Duties: The Mayor shall be the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes and shall be the presiding officer at City Council meetings. The Mayor shall assume his/her duties immediately upon the election of the City Council officers at the City Council’s reorganization meeting

4.8.6 Mayor’s Powers: In presiding at a City Council meeting, the Mayor shall facilitate and guide the meeting, preserve order and decorum, and ensure that the meeting runs smoothly, fairly and in accordance with these Rules and Procedures. The Mayor shall exercise the power to limit the time of any person speaking from the floor consistent with the Council’s Rules, state questions coming before the City Council, announce its decisi on on all subjects and decide all questions of order, subject, however, to an appeal to the City Council, as a whole. In the event of an appeal to the City Council as a whole, a majority vote shall govern and conclusively determine questions of order. The Mayor may make motions, vote or abstain on all motions. The Mayor, or if the Mayor is unavailable, the Vice -Mayor, shall sign all ordinances, resolutions and other documents adopted and approved by the City Council, unless the City Council designates other wise. Traditionally, the Mayor has also been assigned by the City Council to consult and coordinate with the City Manager in the development of agendas for meetings of the City Council. The scope of such review focuses on the timing of business items and the volume of business that can be considered at any one meeting. Such review does not allow for a unilateral unlimited delay of items to be considered by the Council or the introduction of new items not otherwise part of the Council’s identified priorities or staff’s work plan. The staff maintains a “tentative” Council Calendar that identifies when matters will likely be considered at future meetings.

5. Order of Business and Agenda

5.1 Order of Business : Shall be as in the agenda prepared by City Cler k, in substantial compliance with the following forms:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

I. CLOSED SESSION– CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL

II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS – CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEMS 112

III. CO

NVENE INTO CLOSED SESSION

IV. REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION – ROLL CALL

V. REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION

VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

VII. MOMENT OF SILENCE

VIII. INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS/COMMISSION REPORTS

IX. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS

X. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS

XII. C ONSENT CALENDAR

XIII. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS

XIV. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

XV. CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENTS,

COMMITTEE, SUB-COMMITTEE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE

REPORTS, AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

XVI. ADJOURNMENT

5.2 Agenda : The City Clerk shall as contained in the Agenda prepare the order of business of each meeting. The Agenda shall be a listing by topic of subjects to be considered by the Council, and shall be delivered to members of the Council prior to the meeting to which it pertains, and within the time frame established by the Brown Act.

An item may be placed on a Council meeting agenda by any of the following methods:

(1) A Council Member may request an item be considered on a future agenda and, upon agreement of a majority of the Council, staff will prepare a staff report if formal Council action is required. Council Members may make this request during a meeting under Section XV. The process involves two steps: initial consideration of the request by the full Council and, if a majority agrees, the matter is then scheduled for further consideration on an upcoming meeting agenda, or placed on the Council’s pending items list with no specific date set.

113
(
2) By the City Manager

(3) By the City Attorney

The Agenda Committee composed of the Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk shall meet bi-weekly to plan the scheduling and order of the agenda for future Council meetings.

5.3 Presentation by Members of Council : The Council shall have time to deliberate when the Mayor or any Council Member brings before the Council any business that he/she feels is appropriate for Council deliberation. These matters need not be specifically listed on the Agenda, but formal action on such matters shall be deferred until a subsequent Council meeting.

Immediate action may be taken upon determination by a majority vote of the Council if the issue qualifies as an “emergency situation” as defined in the Ralph M. Brown Act.

5.4 Process for Addressing Agenda Action Items before the City Council

• Mayor reads the agenda item
• Staff presents their report
• Council questions staff
• Public Comments are heard (if a public hearing is required, the public hearing will be opened, public comments taken, and the public hearing closed.) • Council discusses item
• A motion is made and seconded
• Final Council discussion
• Council votes or provides direction to staff

5.5 Reading of Minutes : Minutes belong to the City Council/Board of Directors. Unless a member of the Council requests a reading of the minutes of a Council meeting, such minutes may be approved without reading if the City Clerk previously furnished each member with a copy thereof. On Consent Calendar, approval of minutes shall be by a standard majority vote and items can be pulled for discussion and reinserted or pulled for discussion and a separate vote taken.

5.6 Process for Requesting Changes to the Minutes: Requests for non- material changes and challenges to material points should be directed to the City Manager or appropriate staff after the minutes have been pulled for discussion pursuant to Section 5.5. Challenges to material points should be presented to the City Manager and the City Clerk shall review the recording of the meeting in question prior to the next r egularly scheduled meeting where the results of the review will be reported by the City Manager. Action items cannot be rescinded, but can be pulled at the meeting for further discussion and direction.
114

6. Ordinances

6.1 Effective Date:

Pursuant to California Government Code Sec. 36937, ordinances take effect 30 days after their final passage. An ordinance takes effect immediately, if it is an ordinance:

(a) Relating to an election.

(b) For the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and is passed by a four-fifths vote of the council.

(c) Relating to street improvement proceedings.

(d) Related to taxes for the usual and current expenses of the city.

(e) Covered by particular provisions of law prescribing the manner of its passage and adoption.

6.2 Reading by Title Only : Upon being introduced, each proposed ordinance shall be read by title only, with further reading waived unless any member of the Council request s a full reading of the ordinance.

6.3 Majority Vote Required : Resolutions, orders for the payment of money, and all ordinances require a recorded majority vote of the total membership of the Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 36936. A motion, or any other proposition may be adopted by a majority voting on the issue except as otherwise specified by City Ordinance or State Statutes. When any vote is called, each Council Member shall respond “yes (aye),” “no”, “abstain”, or “pass”. Any Council Member who responds, “pass” will be given the opportunity at the end of the roll call to change their vote. Any “pass” response not changed shall be recorded as an abstention. A Council Member shall recuse himself or herself from a vote if required to do so by State conflict of interest laws, pursuant to the process provided under state law.

6.4 Requests for Preparation of Ordinances or Issuance of Legal Opinions: Any member of the City Council, with the approval of a majority of the Council, may request the City Manager to place the proposed adoption of an ordinance or resolution on the City Council agenda for discussion purposes. The City Attorney shall review proposed ordinances and resolutions for form and provide legal advice prior to and during discussion, consideration, and adoption by the City Council.

115
A
ll ordinances and resolutions prepared by the City Attorney shall be provided to the City Manager, who shall distribute them to all members of the City Council so that they may be fully informed of the status of City affairs.

7. Creation of Committees, Boards and Commissions

7.1 Citizen Committees, Boards and Commissions : The Council may create committees, boards, sub- committees and commissions to assist in the conduct of the operation of the City government with such duties as the Council may specify which are consistent with the City Code.

7.2 Membership and Selections: Membership and selection of members shall be as provided by the Council if not specified by the City Code. Any committee, board, or commission so created shall cease to exist upon the accomplishment of the special purpose for which it was created, or when abolished by a majority vote of the Council. No committee so appointed shall have powers other than advisory to t he Council or to the City Manager, except as otherwise specified by the City Code.

7.3 Removal of Members of Boards and Commissions : The Council may remove any member of any board or commission which it has created or as created by the City Code by a vote of at least a majority of the Council.

7.4 Subc ommittees - Operation of City Council Subc ommittees: The City Council shall utilize the subcommittee process to assist the work of staff and to conduct preliminary policy evaluation for purpose of recommendation to the full City Council. Such subc ommittee shall have no authority to resolve and act on policy issues and shall not act as a committee of the whole Council. With the exception of urgency items and personnel issues, notice of a scheduled subcommittee meeting shall be posted not less than 72 hours prior to the scheduled subcommittee meeting. Such notice shall include the date, time, location and item to be discussed. In addition, the subc ommittee shall cause a summary of the discussion held to be provided to all Council Members and appropriate staff. Any formal recommendation of the subcommittee to the full Council shall be in writing. A Council subcommittee is considered a standing committee subject to open meeting requirements, unless it meets the “ad hoc committee” exception under the Brown Act.

8. Citizens’ Rights

8.1 Public Comment: Any person desiring to address the Council, Commission, Subcommittee or other dul y established body shall first present a speaker's card to the Chair and shal l be recognized by the Chair. No person, other than members of the Council and the person having the floor, shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through the members of the Council. No questions shall be asked the Council Members, except through the Mayor or presiding officer.

116

8.2 Time Limits on Speakers: Disruptive Conduct: The Mayor or presiding officer may establish reasonable limits on the amount of time allocated for public comment on particular issues and for each i ndividual speaker. In addition, the Mayor or presiding officer may rule a speaker to be out of order if that speaker engages in disorderly conduct, which disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of City Council business by, among other things: a) uttering threatening or abusive language , b) speaking in excess of the time limits established by the Mayor or presiding officer, or c) repeatedly attempting to enter into discussion with staff, Council Members, or other members of the public.

8.3 Written Communications: Interested parties, or their authorized representatives, may address the Council by written communication in regard to any matter concerning the City’s business or over which the Council has control at any time by direct mail, email, or by addressing the City Clerk, who will distribute copies to the Council Members.

9. Regional Appointments

9.1 Appointments to Regional Committees: In December of each year, the Mayor shall review the appointments to all regional committees and make appointments, as necessary, at the Council’s first meeting in January of each year. The Mayor shall consult with members of the Council to discuss their availability to participate in various regional committees.

9.2 Appointments to City Subc ommittees: In December of each year, the Mayor shall review appointments to all City Council subcommittees and make appointments, as necessary, at the Council’s first meeting in January of each year. The Mayor shall consult with members of the Council to discuss their availability to participate in City Council subcommittees.

10. Amendments

10.1 Amendment of These Rules: These rules may be amended, or new rules adopted, by a majority vote of all members of the Council, provided that the proposed amendments or new rules shall have been introduced into the record at a prior Council meeting.

11. Rules of Conduct

11.1 Council M embers should be prepared for all meetings by reading and reviewing the material provided to them.

11.2 M embers of the City Council should be aware that all information covered in Closed Session is confidential and not for public discussion.

11.3 Council Members are encouraged to set up appointments with the City Manager, Department Heads and staff, if possible. The Non- Interference Clause, Section 2 -3.1-5 of the Municipal Code should always be considered when working with staff at City Hall.

117

11.4 Council M embers conduct when attending meetings, as a representative of the City of Hercules, should always reflect the highest standards.

11.5 Members of the City Council should remember that they are representing the City of Hercules when attending events, not just themselves.

11.6 Council M embers should be cognizant of the funds allocated to them within the City’s budget and not use more than their allocated amount for trips and events so that other member’s allocations will not be impacted.

11.7 In addition to the Rules of Conduct herein, Council Members shall follow the requirements of City’s Ethics Policy, adopted May 28, 2013, as Re solution No. 13- 051, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

12. Legislative Process and Taking Positions

12.1 Limitations on resources and staffing constrain the City’s level of involvement in state legislative matters, initiatives and ballot measures.

12.2 In consideration of the limitations on resources and staffing, the City Council shall not consider or take positions on legislation, ballot measures, or issues of interest or concern that would not result in a direct tangible benefit to Hercules.

12.3 The City Manager or City Attorney may identify legislation or issues of direct local importance, impact, or benefit, or where the City of Hercules taking a position would be inordinately influential such as when a local legislative repres entative is the author or co-author of a measure, which in his or her opinion necessitates or warrants the City taking a position. In these limited instances, the City Manager or City Attorney may author a letter to be signed by the Mayor or Vice Mayor, as appropriate. The City Council shall be copied on any correspondence initiated through this process.

12.4 Matters may still be considered by the City Council as a whole to express an official position of the City upon request of the City Manager or City Attorney or as part of the process for placing matters on the Council agenda by the City Council specified in Section 5.2.

12.5 Individual City Council members may author letters supporting or opposing legislation, ballot measures, initiatives, or other issues of interest using City letterhead in their individual capacity, in which case language must be included that clearly states the correspondence does not reflect the official position of the City or the City Council as a whole.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 13-051 Ethics Policy
118

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Lauren Berges, City Clerk

SUBJECT: City Council Regular Meeting Dates for 2023

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Review the schedule of City Council Regular Meeting Dates in 2023 and consider canceling one or more regular meetings in August and the November 28th and December 26th regular meetings.

COMMISSION/SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:

There was no commission or subcommittee review of this item.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

DISCUSSION:

The City Council traditionally goes dark for one or two meetings in August of each year to allow for vacations, and generally cancels the second meetings in the months of November and December if they fall on holiday weeks.

August meetings are scheduled for August 8th and August 22nd. The November 28th meeting is on the Tuesday the week after the Thanksgiving holiday. City Offices will be closed November 22nd through November 26th. The December 26th meeting falls on the Christmas Holiday with City Offices closed December 20th through January 2nd.

Attached is a 2023 Calendar showing all City Council and Commission meeting dates and dates when City Offices are closed due to holidays.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Calendar

119
January 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

April 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 July 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

October 2023

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

February 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28

May 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

August 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

November 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30

March 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

June 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30

September 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

December 2023

S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 2023
City of Hercules Meeting
Schedule

January
1: New Year's Day
16: Martin Luther King Day
February
20: Presidents Day
May
29: Memorial Day
June
19: Juneteenth
July
4: Independence Day
September
4: Labor Day
November
11: Veterans' Day
23: Thanksgiving
December
25: Christmas Day

City Offices are open Monday-Thursday.

Dates noted in red are dates offices are
closed.

Regular City Meetings
City Council
Community & Library Services
Commission
Finance Commission
Planning Commission

120

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

DATE: Regular Meeting of December 13, 2022

TO: Members of the City Council

VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager

SUBMITTED BY: Lauren Berges, City Clerk

SUBJECT: 2023 Council Appointments on Regional Committees and Council Subcommittees

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Express interest and availability for the 2023 Council Appointments on Regional Committees and Council Subcommittees to be made by the Mayor at the January 10, 2023 meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATION:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

DISCUSSION:

In January of each year, the Mayor appoints members of the Council to both Regional Committees and Council Subcommittees for a one year term.

The purpose of this item is to solicit interest and availability of Council Members to serve on these various bodies. The Mayor will make the assignments at the January 10, 2023 City Council meeting.

Attached is the List of Regional Committees and Council Subcommittees identifying the appointees for 2022.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2022 City Council Representation on Regional Committees and City Subcommittee List

121

CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATION ON REGIONAL COMMITTEES

AND CITY SUB-COMMITTEES
APPROVED – January 11, 2022

COMMITTEES

APPOINTED

COUNCIL
MEMBER

ALTERNATE

MEETING SCHEDULE

AND/OR LOCATION

REGIONAL COMMITTEES
ABAG
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607
510-464-7900
www.abag.ca.gov
Walker-Griffin Grimsley Exec. Bd. Meets 3rd Thursday every other month 7:00 p.m. (Jan., Mar., May,
July, Sept. and Nov.) Attendance
Optional
Contra Costa Mayors Conference
http://www.ccmayors.org/
Bailey Walker-Griffin First Thursday/mo. – 6:30 p.m.

Location Rotates
Hercules/Pinole - Wastewater
Management
Romero/Grimsley Walker-Griffin 1st Thursday/mo. – 8:30 a.m.

Location alternates with City of Pinole
League of Cities-E. Bay Division Bailey Walker-Griffin 4th Thurs./mo. – Bd. Mtg. - 6:30 p.m.

Location Rotates
Capital Corridor JPA Board (Liaison) Romero Walker-Griffin 3rd Wed/Feb., June, Sept. Nov. – 10:00 a.m., alternates SJ, Sacramento and Suisan
Water Emergency Transportation
Authority (WETA) Liaison
Walker-Griffin Grimsley 1st Thursday/mo. – 1:00 p.m., alternates between SF and Alameda
West County Integrated Waste Mgmt

JPA (WCCIWMA)
One Alvarado Square
San Pablo, CA 94806
510-215-3125
www.recyclemore.com
Romero Walker-Griffin 2nd Thursday/mo. - 7:00 p.m.

San Pablo City Hall – Council
Chambers- One Alvarado Sq., San Pablo

Form 806 required - $50 stipend
Form 700 required
WCCTAC
13831 San Pablo Avenue
San Pablo, CA 94806
510-215-3221
www.wcctac.org
Kelley Bailey Last Friday/mo. – 8:00 a.m.

El Cerrito City Hall

Form 700 Required
West Co. Mayors & Supervisors
Assoc.

Bailey Walker-Griffin 4th Thursday/mo. – 8:00 a.m.

The location rotates
WestCat
601 Walter Avenue
Pinole, CA 94564
www.westcat.org
Bailey/Grimsley Kelley 2nd Thursday/mo. – 6:00 p.m.

Pinole Council Chambers, Pear St.

Form 700 required

122

CITY COMMITTEES

COMMITTEES

APPOINTED

COUNCIL
MEMBER

ALTERNATE

MEETING SCHEDULE

AND/OR LOCATION
Agenda Setting Bailey Walker-Griffin Thursday prior to meeting 8:00 a.m.

Economic Development
Subcommittee
Bailey/
Grimsley
Romero As needed and at least quarterly (In-Active)
Education Subcommittee Bailey/W-Griffin Grimsley As needed and at least quarterly (In-Active) Public Safety/Traffic Bailey/Grimsley Kelley As needed and at least quarterly

CITY COMMISSIONS – COUNCIL LIAISONS
Planning Commission Bailey/Grimsley 1st and 3rd Mondays Community & Library Services
Commission
Romero/Bailey 2nd Monday
Finance Commission W-Griffin/Kelley 4th Monday

COMMITTEES NOT ASSIGNED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
East Bay Economic Development
Alliance
Kelley Not a City Appointment
(Appointed by CC Mayors)
CCTA Kelley Not a City Appointment
(Appointed by CCTA)

123