Cities Index.
Agenda Packet

Hercules City Council
October 22, 2024

Document
Agenda Packet
Meeting
October 22, 2024
Body
Hercules City Council
Pages
8
Original file
22.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on hercules.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

Tuesday, October 22, 2024
6:00 PM
City of Hercules
111 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547
City Council
Mayor Dan Romero
Vice Mayor Dion Bailey
Council Member Alex Walker-Griffin
Council Member Chris Kelley
Council Member Tiffany Grimsley
Dante Hall, City Manager
Christie Crowl, City Attorney
Eibleis Melendez, City Clerk
Meeting Agenda
CLOSED SESSION - 6:00 P.M., REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M.

In-Person in Council Chambers or to Listen only:

Zoom ID: 841 2152 1399
Zoom Passcode: 127003 Zoom Phone Number: 1-669-900-6833 1 October 22, 2024City Council Meeting Agenda
See last pages of agenda for information regarding meeting procedures To view webcast of meetings, live or on demand, go to the City's website at www.ci.hercules.ca.us I. CLOSED SESSION – CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL - 6:00 P.M.

IA CONSIDER AND TAKE ACTION ON ANY REQUEST FROM A COUNCIL MEMBER TO

PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING REMOTELY DUE TO JUST CAUSE OR EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES PURSUANT TO AB 2449

IB SPECIAL MEETING - CLOSED SESSION
II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
III. CONVENE INTO CLOSED SESSION
The Hercules City Council will meet in Closed Session regarding the following:

1. 22-978

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(e)(1) in one matter.

2. 22-989 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - City Negotiators: Dante Hall, City Manager; Edwin Gato, Director of Finance; relative to the following employee groups:
a. Teamsters Local 315 Employee Organizations
b. Hercules Police Officers Association

3. 22-990
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to
Government Code section 54956.8. CONFERENCE WITH Real
Property Negotiators Property address: 1680 Refugio Valley Road, Hercules CA 94547 Agency Negotiators: Dante Hall, City Manager; Christie Crowl, City Attorney, Negotiating Parties: City of Hercules, Rodeo Hercules Fire Protection District
IV. REGULAR MEETING – CONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - ROLL CALL - 7:00 P.M.

V. REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
VII. MOMENT OF SILENCE
VIII. INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS/COMMISSION REPORTS

Page 2 ends

2 October 22, 2024City Council Meeting Agenda
IX. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
X. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This time is reserved for members of the public to address issues not included in the agenda. In accordance with the Brown Act, Council will refer to staff any matters brought before them at this time, and those matters may be placed on a future agenda.

Individuals wishing to address the City Council are asked to complete a form indicating the name and address of the speaker and the general topic to be addressed. Speakers must make their comments from the podium and will be allowed 3 minutes to discuss their concerns. All public comments are recorded and become part of the public record. A limit of 30 minutes will be devoted to taking public comment at this point in the agenda. If any speakers remain at the conclusion of the initial 30 minute period, time will be reserved at the conclusion of the meeting to take the remaining comments.

XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
XII. CONSENT CALENDAR

1. 22-991
Meeting Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 8, 2024 Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meeting of October 8, 2024Attachments:

2. 22-992 Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2024 Staff Report - Investment Quarterly Report Ending 09302024 Attach 1 - Quarterly Investment Report
Attachments:

3. 22-993 Approve Memorandum of Understanding with the Hercules Police Officers Association (HPOA).

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding with the Hercules Police Officers Association (HPOA).

Staff Report - Hercules Police MOU
Attach 1 - Resolution
Attach 2 - HPOA 2024-2025 MOU-DRAFT (Redline)
Attach 3 - HPOA 2024-2025 MOU (Final)
Attachments:

Page 3 ends

3 October 22, 2024City Council Meeting Agenda
XIII. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS

1. 22-994 Professional Services Agreement with LSA in the amount of $132,101 to Secure the Environmental Permits, Complete the Final Design, and Perform Analytical Testing on the Spoils for the Lake Refugio Dredging Project and appropriating $32,101 from the General Fund/Capital Reserves to fully fund the Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with LSA for a not to exceed amount of $132,101 to secure the environmental permits, complete the final design, and perform analytical testing on the spoils for the Lake Refugio Dredging Project and appropriating $32,101 from the General Fund/Capital Reserves to fully fund the agreement.

Staff Report - Lake Refugio Dredging
Attach 1 - Resolution
Attach 2 - 24-064 LSA Associates Inc. Professional Services Agreement Attachments:

2. 22-995 City-Sponsored Event Policy Amendments
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve a resolution amending the City-Sponsored Event Policy to allow the City Manager to fully or partially waive facility rental fees as well as permit fees as an in-kind contribution to community events that the City chooses to co-sponsor with City-recognized nonprofit groups.

Staff Report - City-Sponsored Event Policy Amendments
Attach 1 - Resolution Amending City-Sponsored Event Policy Attach 2 - Proposed Amended City-Sponsored Event Policy Attach 3 - City Recognized Nonprofit Groups
Attachments:

3. 22-998 Discussion on Inclusive Recreation Programming for Individuals with Disabilities
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive a report on a potential inclusive event designed to serve individuals with disabilities, discuss the subject, and provide additional feedback.

Staff Report - Inclusive Recreation
Attach 1 - Inclusive Recreation Dances
Attach 2 - Inclusive Recreation Movie - Game Night
Attachments:

Page 4 ends

4 October 22, 2024City Council Meeting Agenda

4. 22-996 Queen Anne House Demolition
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution finding demolition of the Queen Anne house to be exempt from CEQA, authorizing its demolition, and amending the General Fund FY 2024-25 Budget for the Public Works Department increasing its appropriation by $50,000 for testing and demolition of the structure.

Staff Report - Queen Anne House Demolition
Attach 1 - Resolution
Attach 2 - Hercules Queen Anne Integrity Evaluation Final 09-17-2024 Attachments:

5. 22-997 Youth In Government Day
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Hercules City Council receives report about Youth In Government Day that will take place on Tuesday, November 12, 2024.

Staff Report - Youth In Government Day 2024Attachments:

XIV. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This time is reserved for members of the public who were unavailable to attend the Public Communications period during Section X of the meeting, or were unable to speak due to lack of time. The public speaker requirements specified in Section X of this Agenda apply to this Section.

XV. CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENTS,

COMMITTEE, SUB-COMMITTEE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE REPORTS

AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This is the time for brief announcements on issues of interest to the community. In accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, matters which do not appear on this agenda but require City Council discussion may be either (a) referred to staff or other resources for factual information or (b) placed on a future meeting agenda.

1. Regional Committee

2. City Council Committees and Subcommittees

3. Commission Liaisons

Page 5 ends

5 October 22, 2024City Council Meeting Agenda
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, November 12, 2024 at 7:00p.m. in the Council Chambers.

Agendas are posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) or Section 54956.

Members of the public can view electronic agendas and staff reports by accessing the City website at www.ci.hercules.ca.us and can receive e-mail notification of agenda and staff report postings by signing up to receive an e-notice from the City’s homepage. Agendas and staff reports may also be obtained by contacting the City Clerk at (510) 799-8200 (Posted: October 17, 2024)

INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE AND WATCH THE HERCULES CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING

COMMISSION HYBRID MEETINGS
Attend in Person: Hercules City Council Chambers – 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA 94547 Attend via Zoom Teleconference: Details provided below and zoom webinar login, passcode and phone numbers provided on the agenda cover.

Page 6 ends

6 October 22, 2024City Council Meeting Agenda
How to Submit Public Comments
In Person: Attend meeting at the Hercules City Council Chambers, fill out a public speaker card located on the side table and submit it to the City Clerk.

Via Zoom: Members of the public may submit a remote public comment via Zoom video conferencing. Download the Zoom mobile app from the Apple Appstore or Google Play. If you are using a desktop computer, you can test your connection to Zoom by clicking here or go to: https://www.zoom.us/join. Zoom also allows you to join by phone at +1-669-900-6833 or +1-929-205-6099 or +1-253-215-8782.

Written Comments Submitted Electronically: All comments received before 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be provided to the City Council prior to the meeting and posted to the City’s agenda website and located by clicking on the “meeting details” tab. Written comments received after 3:00 p.m. will be provided to City Council and posted to the agenda website the following day. Written comments will not be read aloud during the meeting. Email comments to [email protected]. Please indicate which item on the agenda you are commenting on in the subject line of your email.

Written comments submitted in person or via mail: Additional ways to provide your public comment is to either drop off your comment in person to the front desk receptionist located in the City Hall lobby or to mail your comment to City of Hercules, ATTN: City Clerk – Public Comment (Meeting Date), 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA 94547 in time to reach the City Clerk no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting or you can submit your comment by telephone by calling (510) 799-8208 no later than 3:00 p.m. on the meeting date.

If you need assistance with public comment, please contact: Eibleis Melendez City Clerk at [email protected] or by calling (510) 799-8208.

All public comments will become part of the official meeting record. As email containing public meeting comments are part of the official record, note that personal contact information may be published if it is included with your email. The City cannot guarantee that its network and/or the website will not be uninterrupted. To ensure that the City Council receives your written comments, you are strongly encouraged to submit your comments in writing in advance of the meeting by 3:00 p.m. on the day of the Council or Commission meeting.

OTHER WAYS TO WATCH THE MEETING
Live on Channel 28: City Council meetings will replay the following Thursday at 7:00 p.m. and Saturday at 1:00 p.m.

Planning Commission meetings will replay the following Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. and Saturday at 9:00 a.m.

Video Streamed Live on the City’s Website:

To view City Council and Planning Commission meeting videos online go to: Hercules Meeting Videos.

Instructions to view Live or On-Demand Videos from the City’s website:

1. Go to: Hercules Meeting Videos or https://hercules.legistar.com/calendar.aspx.

2. Locate the desired meeting and date.

3. Click the associated “Video” link (Video status is as follows):

Video = Video is available for on demand viewing.

In Progress = Video is available for viewing during live recording.

Not Available = Video is either unavailable or has not been recorded.

Page 7 ends

7 October 22, 2024City Council Meeting Agenda

THE HERCULES CITY COUNCIL ADHERES TO THE FOLLOWING POLICIES,

PROCEDURES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

1. SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special accommodations to participate at a City Council meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 510-799-8208 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

2. AGENDA ITEMS: Persons wishing to add an item to an agenda must submit the final written documentation 12 calendar days prior to the meeting. The City retains the discretion whether to add items to the agenda. Persons wishing to address the City Council otherwise may make comments during the Public Communication period of the meeting.

3. AGENDA POSTING: Agendas of regular City Council meetings are posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting at City Hall, the Hercules Swim Center, Ohlone Child Care Center, and on the City’s website (www.ci.hercules.ca.us),

4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: Persons who wish to address the City Council should complete the speaker form prior to the Council's consideration of the item on the agenda.

Anyone who wishes to address the Council on a topic that is not on the agenda and is relevant to the Council should complete the speaker form prior to the start of the meeting. Speakers will be called upon during the Public Communication portion of the meeting. In accordance with the Brown Act, the City Council may not take action on items not listed on the agenda. The Council may refer to staff any matters brought before them at this time and those matters may be placed on a future agenda.

In the interests of conducting an orderly and efficient meeting, speakers will be limited to three (3) minutes.

Anyone may also submit written comments at any time before or during the meeting.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Council or a member of the public prior to the time the City Council votes on the motion to adopt.

6. LEGAL CHALLENGES: If you challenge a decision of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the meeting or in written correspondence delivered at, or prior to, the meeting. Actions challenging City Council decisions shall be subject to the time limitations contained in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.

Page 8 ends

8 CONSENT CALENDAR

AGENDA ITEMS

1. 22-991

2. 22-992

3. 22-993
9 111 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547City of Hercules
Meeting Minutes
City Council
Mayor Dan Romero
Vice Mayor Dion Bailey
Council Member Alex Walker-Griffin
Council Member Chris Kelley
Council Member Tiffany Grimsley
Dante Hall, City Manager
Christie Crowl, City Attorney
Eibleis Melendez, City Clerk
6:00 PMTuesday, October 8, 2024
In-Person in Council Chambers or
Zoom ID: 839 6926 4064
Zoom Passcode: 260983
Zoom Phone Number: 1-669-900-6833
I. CLOSED SESSION – CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL - 6:00 P.M.

Council Member C. Kelley, Council Member A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Romero, and Vice Mayor D. Bailey

Present: 4 -
Council Member T. GrimsleyAbsent: 1 -
II.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
NONE
III. CONVENE INTO CLOSED SESSION
The Hercules City Council will meet in Closed Session regarding the following:

City Attorney, Christie Crowl, read the title of the item to be discussed in Closed Session. City Council and Staff recessed into Closed Session.

1. 22-977 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Conference With Labor Negotiators - City Negotiators: Dante Hall, City Manager; Edwin Gato, Director of Finance; relative to the following employee groups:
a.

Teamsters Local 315 Employee Organizations
b. Hercules Police Officers Association
Meeting went into Recess
Meeting Reconvened
IV. REGULAR MEETING – CONVENE TO OPEN SESSION - ROLL CALL - 7:00 P.M.

Page 1 ends

22-991
10 October 8, 2024City Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member C. Kelley, Council Member A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Romero, and Vice Mayor D. Bailey

Present: 4 -
Council Member T. GrimsleyAbsent: 1 -
V. REPORT ON ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION-
1A. CONSIDER AND TAKE ACTION ON ANY REQUEST FROM A COUNCIL MEMBER TO

PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING REMOTELY DUE TO JUST CAUSE OR EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES PURSUANT TO AB 2449
1B. SPECIAL MEETING - CLOSED SESSION
There was no final or reportable action to report on the item discussed in Closed Session.

VI. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was lead by Vice Mayor Bailey.

VII. MOMENT OF SILENCE
Mayor Romero requested a Moment of Silence in remembrance of the more than 1200 Jewish settlers that were murdered October 7th and the 8700 Israeli's that were injured. We pray that both sides will find peace.

VIII. INTRODUCTIONS/PRESENTATIONS/COMMISSION REPORTS
NONE
IX. AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mayor Romero requested that Discussion Item13.5, Spring 2025 Compost Event, be postponed to a future meeting due to Council Member Grimsley absence. Council agreed unanimously to move the item to a future meeting.

X. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
This time is reserved for members of the public to address issues not included in the agenda. In accordance with the Brown Act, Council will refer to staff any matters brought before them at this time, and those matters may be placed on a future agenda.

Individuals wishing to address the City Council are asked to complete a form indicating the name and address of the speaker and the general topic to be addressed. Speakers must make their comments from the podium and will be allowed 3 minutes to discuss their concerns. All public comments are recorded and become part of the public record. A limit of 30 minutes will be devoted to taking public comment at this point in the agenda. If any speakers remain at the conclusion of the initial 30 minute period, time will be reserved at the conclusion of the meeting to take the remaining comments.

XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS

Page 2 ends

11 October 8, 2024City Council Meeting Minutes
XII. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kelley, seconded by Council Member Walker-Griffin, to adopt the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member C. Kelley, Council Member A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Romero, and Vice Mayor D. Bailey
4 -

Absent: Council Member T. Grimsley1 -

1. 22-967
Meeting Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 24, 2024 Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meeting of September 24, 2024Attachments:

APPROVED

2. 22-969 Amendment No.2 with R3 for a Not to Exceed Amount of $15K to complete the Franchise Agreement Renewal Negotiations for a Total Not to Exceed Contract Amount of $65K and an appropriation of $15K from the Solid Waste Fund to fully fund the Contract
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No.2 with R3 for a not to exceed amount of $15K to complete the franchise agreement renewal negotiations for a total not to exceed contract amount of $65K and appropriating $15K from the Solid Waste Fund to fully fund said amendment. Once negotiations for the new franchise agreement are complete, the $15K will be reimbursed to the City by Republic Services.

Staff Report - R3 Amendment No.2
Attach 1 - Resolution R3 Amend No.2
Attach 2 - R3 Amendment No.2
Attach 3(a) - R3 Amendment No.1
Attach 3(b) - R3 Amendment No.1 Staff Report & Reso
Attach 4 -R3 Base Contract
Attachments:

Resolution 24-065, APPROVED

3. 22-968 Waive Second Reading and Adopt Amended Hercules Municipal Code Modifying the Requirements of a Planned Development Plan (PDP) in the Overlay Districts (Special Flood Hazard Area Overlay District, Refugio Creek Overlay District, School-Park Overlay District, Special Study Area Overlay District and Scenic Road and Highway Overlay District), the Residential Districts (RS-E, RS-L, RM-L, RM-M and RM-H), the Public/Quasi-Public Districts (P/QP-C, P/QP-O, P/QP-P and P/QP-S), the Planned Office-Research and Development Mixed-Use District (PO/RD), and the Planned Commercial Residential Mixed-Use District (PC-R).

Page 3 ends

12 October 8, 2024City Council Meeting Minutes
Modify the Planned Development Plan Section to allow the PDP process to be utilized as requested by an applicant in all zones and overlay districts.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 24-XX (Attachment 1) to amend provisions of Hercules Municipal Code Sections 13-6.200(3), 13-10.200(3), 13-15.200(1 & 2), 13-16.200(1-3), 13-21.400(2), 13-22.300(1 & 2), 13-23.300(1), 13-24.300(1 & 2) and 13-25.300(2) to modify the requirement of a Planned Development Plan (PDP) for new and expanded development within the specified zoning and overlay districts, to amend Hercules Municipal Code Section 13-48.200 to allow a PDP process to be requested in all zoning and overlay districts, and finding the actions exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Staff Report - PDP Removal Text Amend
Attach 1 - Ordinance
Attach 2 - Signed PC Resolution 24-05.docx
Attach 3 - Zoning and overlay maps
Attachments:

Ordinance 553, APPROVED

4. 22-970 Consideration And Proposed Adoption Of A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Execute Amendment No. 3 To The Professional Services Agreement With Regional Government Services (RGS) For Human Resources Assistance In The Amount Not To Exceed $100,000 RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council adopt the attached Resolution and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 in the amount of $100,000 to the Professional Services Agreement with Regional Government Services (RGS) for human resources assistance.

Staff Report - Third Amendment To Professional Services Agreement With (RGS) 2024
Attach 1 - Resolution - Third Amendment To Agreement with RGS Attach 2 - Contract with RGS for HR Services
Attach 3 - Amendment 1 to Contract with RGS for HR Services Attach 4 - Adopted FY 2023-24 Budget - RGS Services
Attach 5 - Amendment 2 to RGS HR Agreement
Attach 6 - Amendment 3 to RGS HR Agreement
Attachments:

Resolution 24-066, APPROVED
XIII. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION ITEMS

1. 22-976 Bayfront Boulevard Road Closure for Relocation of Farmers Market RECOMMENDATION:

Page 4 ends

13 October 8, 2024City Council Meeting Minutes
City Council receive a report on a request to close Bayfront Boulevard from Railroad Avenue to Earnest Street to allow for the relocation of Saturday’s Farmers Market, receive public comments, discuss the request, and provide direction to staff.

Staff Report - Bayfront Road Closure Farmers Market
Attach 1 - Signed TUP24-28
Attach 2 - Bayfront Farmer's Market Road Closure Notice Attachments:

Public Works Director, Mike Roberts, introduced and presented the item.

Golden State Farmers Market Association attended via Zoom to answer any questions. Council asked questions and provided comment. Director Roberts provided a response. No public comment. Action was taken on this item.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kelley, seconded by Vice Mayor Bailey, to approve Staffs recommendation through the recommended period, December 2024. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member C. Kelley, Council Member A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Romero, and Vice Mayor D. Bailey
4 -

Absent: Council Member T. Grimsley1 -

2. 22-971
Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Districts (LLAD) - FY 24-25 Staffing Allocation, 5-Year Financial Projections with 30% Reduction in Staff Costs, and Associated Management of the Districts
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the report on the staffing allocation and associated management of the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts (LLAD).

Staff Report - LLAD Staff Allocation
Attach 1 - Bayside LLAD 2005-1 Maintenance Improvement Diagram Attach 2 - Hercules Village-Promenade LLAD 2002-2 Maintenance Improvement Diagram
Attach 3 - Baywood LLAD 2004-1 Maintenance Improvement Diagram Attach 4 - Victoria by the Bay 2002-1 Maintenance Improvement Diagram
Attach 5 - Hercules Arterials-Major Roads Program Map
Attach 6 - Citywide District 83-2 Landscape Maintenance Map Attach 7 - LLAD Staffing Allocation and Admin_Indirect Charges FY 24-25
Attach 8 - Hercules Total Cost Allocation Plan - RCS
Attach 9 - FY 24-25 Adopted with 30% Staff reductions - Baseline Attach 10 - 5-year Projection Findings - F&A
Attach 11 - Staff Report - LLAD PReliminary Engineer's Report 04242018
Attachments:

City Manager, Dante Hall, introduced the item. Public Works Director, Mike Roberts, and Finance Director, Edwin Gato, presented. Public Works

Page 5 ends

14 October 8, 2024City Council Meeting Minutes
Superintendent, Jeff Brown, attended via Zoom to answer any questions.

Council asked questions and provided comment. Director Gato, Director Roberts and City Manager Hall provided a response. No public comment.

This was an informational item. No action was taken.

3. 22-972
Acceptance of a Grant Award from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program(STEP).

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to accept the grant award of $80,000 on behalf of the City of Hercules.

Staff Report - Office of Traffic Safety Grant Award
Attach 1 - Resolution STEP Grant Acceptance - 2024
Attach 2 - STEP Grant Agreement 2024
Attachments:

Police Chief, Joseph Vasquez, introduced and presented the item.

Council asked questions and provided comment. Chief Vasquez provided a response. No public comment. Action was taken on this item.

MOTION: A motion was made by Council Member Kelley, seconded by Council Member Walker-Griffin, to adopt Resolution 24-067. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Council Member C. Kelley, Council Member A. Walker-Griffin, Mayor D. Romero, and Vice Mayor D. Bailey
4 -

Absent: Council Member T. Grimsley1 -

4. 22-973
Quarterly Update on FY 2024-2026 Hercules City Council Strategic Goals RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file the report on FY 2024-2026 Hercules City Council Strategic Goals.

Staff Report - 2024-2026 Hercules City Council Strategic Goals Update
Attach 1 - FY 2024-2026 Hercules City Council Strategic Goals Report
Attach 2 - City of Hercules 2024 Strategic Goals Work Plan Update Attachments:

City Manager, Dante Hall, introduced and presented the item. Council asked questions and provided comment. City Manager Hall provided a response. No public comment. This was an information item. No action was taken on this item.

5. 22-974
Spring 2025 Composting Event
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council receive a report on a proposed community composting event scheduled for Spring 2025.

Page 6 ends

15 October 8, 2024City Council Meeting Minutes
Staff Report - Spring Composting Event
Attach 1(a) Flyer-Materials In organic bin (8.5x11in)
Attach 1(b) Compost Supplies Discount Flyer 2023-2024 - English and Spanish - FOR PRINT
Attachments:

Please see Agenda item IX, Agenda Additions /Deletions for more information. This item got moved to a future meeting.

XIV. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
This time is reserved for members of the public who were unavailable to attend the Public Communications period during Section X of the meeting, or were unable to speak due to lack of time. The public speaker requirements specified in Section X of this Agenda apply to this Section.

XV. CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY ANNOUNCEMENTS,

COMMITTEE, SUB-COMMITTEE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE REPORTS

AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This is the time for brief announcements on issues of interest to the community. In accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, matters which do not appear on this agenda but require City Council discussion may be either (a) referred to staff or other resources for factual information or (b) placed on a future meeting agenda.

1. Regional Committee

2. City Council Committees and Subcommittees

3. Commission Liaisons
City Manager, Dante Hall, promoted upcoming events offered through the Parks and Recreation Department. City Attorney, Christie Crowl, had no announcements.

1. Regional Committee
No reports were provided

2. City Council Committees and Subcommittees
No reports were provided

3. Commission Liaisons
No reports were provided
There were no future agenda item requests.

Page 7 ends

16 October 8, 2024City Council Meeting Minutes
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Romero adjourned the meeting at 8:46 PM.
_________________________________
Dan Romero, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
Eibleis Melendez, City Clerk

Page 8 ends

17 CON

SENT CALENDAR

AGENDA ITEM

2. 22-992
18 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of October 22, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Edwin Gato, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2024
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Pursuant to California Government Code section 53646 and the City’s Investment Policy, a Quarterly Investment Report and certification shall be provided to the City Council, City Manager, and City Auditor. The Quarterly Investment Report shall include a c omplete description of the portfolio, the type of investments, the issuers, maturity dates, par value and dollar amounts invested in all securities. The certification must provide assurances that investments were made consistent with the City’s Investment Policy and that the City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months. The Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2024, is provided as Attachment 1.

BACKGROUND:

To comply with state law and city policy, the City is required to present quarterly investment reports detailing the City's investment portfolio to the City Council, City Manager, and City Auditor. The Council's authority to invest or reinvest funds or sell or exchange securities is delegated to the City's Finance Director, who also serves as City Treasurer. Pursuant to the Investment Policy, the City Treasurer may delegate some of their fiduciary responsibility to an outside investment management firm. An investment manager's fiduciary responsibility is a legal requirement related to registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisor Act of 1940. Due to the specialized services and expertise required to assist the City in the varied investment options available, the City has 22-992
19 used the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) experienced investment managers.

ANALYSIS:

This report presents the City’s investment portfolio for the quarter ending September 30, 2024. It has been prepared to comply with regulations contained in California Government Code Section 53646 and City’s Investment Policy. The report includes all cash and investments managed by the City. It also includes City-related investments held by bond trustees for debt service obligations as well as money held in the irrevocable trust with PARS for pension and other post-employment benefits (OPEB). The report provides information on the investment type, issuer, maturity date, cost, and current market value for each security.

The City utilizes the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) as a money market fund administered by the State Treasurer. LAIF has many governmental agency participants and holds securities through its administrator. LAIF provides local agencies a way to invest cash held in treasury pool that may be withdrawn as needed on a same-day basis to meet the agency’s cash flow needs while realizing interest generated by the Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA). Moreover, the Investments held by Bond Trustees are administered in accordance with individual bond indentures.

As of September 30, 2024, the overall pooled investment portfolio average yield (before adjustments for changes in market value) was 3.03%, which is lower than the rate for two- year U.S. Treasury Note at 3.66% and LAIF average monthly rate of 4.58%. The market value of the pooled portfolio was $202,969 or 0.30% lower than the book value. As the City does not intend to sell its pooled investment portfolio securities prior to maturity, this will have no effect on yield.

81.89% of the total Investment Portfolio was deposited with LAIF as of September 30, 2024.

LAIF has 82.1% of its investments in U.S. Treasuries and agency notes, 8.2% in CDs and bank notes, and 9.8% in other types of investments. Additional economic summaries and specific information related to each investment advisor and LAIF are included i n the Investment Portfolio Summary Report, which is in Attachment 1.

Amount
Market Over/(Under) Average
Investment Type Value Cost Yield
Petty Cash $2,005 - 0.00%
Cash in Bank 4,504,681 - 1.00% Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 54,892,393 ($202,969) 4.58% Irrevocable Trust (Pension) 2,484,899 - 5.23% Irrevocable Trust (OPEB) 3,000,983 - 5.23% Investments with Bond Trustees 2,120,215 - 4.13% Total Portfolio $67,005,176 ($202,969) 2.99%
20 The City invests its idle cash from all operating funds on a pooled basis to maximize returns.

Earnings are allocated to each fund based on the average cash balance. The timing of revenue collections, such as property tax, business licenses, and franchise tax, affects the quarterly investment income during the year. There is adequate cash to meet expected obligations over the next six months.

Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement 40 requires the City to recognize the fair market value of its investments at the end of each fiscal year. The market values of investments included in this report are obtained from the State Controller’s office for LAIF and from the City’s registered investment managers and bond trustees for all other investments. These market valuations are subject to daily changes. The difference between market value and historical costs, known as Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses, are temporary in nature and are not cash related transactions. Since it is the City’s general intention to hold its investments until maturity, when they would be redeemed at par value, any unrealized gain or loss is only reported at the end of the fiscal year in the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report.

Of the total cash and investments reported above, the portions held in the City’s General Fund (approximately $25.2 million, or 37%) and Internal Service Funds (approximately $1.2 million or 2%) are unrestricted, although a portion of these amounts may be committed for existing obligations or designated for speci fic purposes. The remaining $ 40.8 million, or 61%, of the City’s cash and investments are restricted for specific uses, in accordance with federal, state, or local agency rules and regulations.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This is an information report with no fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Quarterly Investment Report

21 1

INVESTMENT REPORT
For the Quarter Ending September 30, 2024
City of Hercules, California
22 CITY OF HERCULES

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
111 CIVIC DRIVE
HERCULES, CALIFORNIA 94547-1771
PHONE: 510-799-8200
October 22, 2024
Honorable Mayor and City Council:

I verified that this investment portfolio, as of September 30, 2024 , conforms with all state laws and City’s investment policy. The City’s expenditures requirements for the next months are covered by anticipated revenues from City operations and liquidity from cash on deposit.

As of September 30, 2024, the City has sufficient funds to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Sincerely,
Edwin Gato
Finance Director/City Treasurer
23 City of Hercules, California
Investment Portfolio Summary Report
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2024
Book % of Average Market
Value Total Yield Value
Cash on Hand $2,005 $2,005
Cash on Deposit 4,504,681 4,504,681
Total Cash on Hand 4,506,686 6.70% 1.00% 4,506,686 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 55,095,362 81.89% 4.58% 54,892,393 Irrevocable Trust (Pension) 2,518,236 3.74% 5.44% 2,518,236 Irrevocable Trust (OPEB) 3,041,244 4.52% 5.44% 3,041,244 Investments with Bond Trustees 2,120,215 3.15% 4.13% 2,120,215 Total Portfolio $67,281,743 100.00% 3.03% $67,078,774
Amount over (under) Market Value vs. Book Value ($202,969) % of Portfolio -0.30%
Investments by Type
Cash on Hand
LAIF
Irrevocable Trust
(Pension)
Irrevocable Trust
(OPEB)
Investments with
Trustees
24 City of Hercules
Detail for Investment Portfolio Summary Report
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2024
(DAYS)

BOOK PURCHASE MATURITY LIFE TO REMAINING PAR MARKET

DESCRIPTION VALUE RATE YIELD DATE DATE MATURITY LIFE VALUE VALUE

CASH ON HAND
PETTY CASH 2,005.00 0.00% 0.00% 2,005.00 $2,005.00

CASH IN BANK
MECHANICS BANK - GENERAL CHECKING 3,672,411.34 0.00% 0.00% 3,672,411.34 3,672,411.34 MECHANICS BANK - HERCULES RDA 750,900.46 0.00% 0.00% 750,900.46 750,900.46 MECHANICS BANK - PD ASSET SEIZURE 59,343.77 0.00% 0.00% 59,343.77 59,343.77 CalTRUST 22,025.10 1.00% 1.00% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 22,025.10 22,025.10 TOTAL AND AVERAGES 4,504,680.67 1.00% 1.00% 91 - 4,504,680.67 4,504,680.67

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)
LAIF 55,095,362.33 4.58% 4.58% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 55,095,362.33 54,892,393.33

IRREVOCABLE TRUST (PENSION/OPEB)
US BANK MUTUAL (PARS-OPEB) 3,041,243.79 5.44% 5.44% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 3,041,243.79 3,041,243.79 US BANK MUTUAL (PARS-PENSION) 2,518,236.05 5.44% 5.44% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 2,518,236.05 2,518,236.05 TOTAL AND AVERAGES 5,559,479.84 5.44% 5.44% 91 - 5,559,479.84 5,559,479.84

INVESTMENTS WITH BOND TRUSTEES

WEBSTER BANK (STERLING NATIONAL BANK
ESCROW) 118,729.19 0.25% 0.25% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 118,729.19 118,729.19 THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) JM 05 1 RESSMT FD
2019 192,173.59 0.00% 0.00% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 192,173.59 192,173.59 THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) JM 05 1 RESERVE
FUND 55,797.47 0.00% 0.00% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 55,797.47 55,797.47

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON TRUST
HERCULES PFA WW INTEREST ACCT 21 A 2,887.50 0.00% 0.00% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 2,887.50 2,887.50

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON TRUST
(HERCULES PFA 09 REVENUE FUND) 667,332.67 5.10% 5.10% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 667,332.67 667,332.67

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON TRUST
(HERCULES PFA 09 DEBT SERV PRIN ACCT) 54,346.34 5.10% 5.10% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 54,346.34 54,346.34

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON TRUST
(HERCULES PFA 09 DEBT SERV INT ACCT) 104,165.47 5.10% 5.10% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 104,165.47 104,165.47

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON TRUST
(HERCULES PFA 09 RESERVE FD) 920,215.00 5.10% 5.10% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 920,215.00 920,215.00

THE BANK OF NEW YORK (BNY) MELLON TRUST
(HERCULES 2020 INT FD) 4,567.80 0.00% 0.00% 7/1/2024 9/30/2024 91 - 4,567.80 4,567.80 TOTAL AND AVERAGES 2,120,215.03 4.13% 4.13% 91 - 2,120,215.03 2,120,215.03 TOTAL INVESTMENT REPORT $67,281,742.87 3.03% 3.03% 91 - $67,281,742.87 $67,078,773.87 25 City of Hercules, California
Investment Portfolio Summary Report
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2024
% of
Cash Description Book Value Total
Bond Trustee $2,120,215 3%
Irrevocable Trust 5,559,480 8%
Restricted 33,222,457 49%
General Fund 25,220,775 37%
Internal Service Funds 1,158,816 2%
Total, Book Value $67,281,743 100%
Restricted:

Wastewater 16,161,192
Successor Housing 5,883,016
Development Impact Fees 3,658,749
Successor Agency 2,594,757
Gas Tax & Measure J "Street" 1,144,069
SB1 RMRA 1,108,312
Solid Waste 892,427
Agency Fund 781,088
Landscape & Lighting 729,776
Asset Seizure 240,563
BART (Park & Ride) 28,508
33,222,457
Bond Trustee
3%
Irrevocable Trust
8%
Restricted
49%
General Fund
38%
Internal Service Funds
2%
Cash by Fund
26 September 4.575
August 4.579
July 4.516
June 4.480
May 4.332
April 4.272
PMIA Average Life(1): 217
LAIF Fair Value Factor(1): 0.996316042
PMIA Daily(1): 4.52
PMIA Quarter to Date(1): 4.36
LAIF Apportionment Rate(2): 4.55
LAIF Earnings Ratio(2): 0.00012419067099490
LAIF Administrative Cost(1)*: 0.16
Treasuries

58.85%Agencies

23.21%
Certificates of
Deposit/Bank Notes

8.17%
Time
Deposits

3.22%
Commercial
Paper

5.79%
Corporate
Bonds

0.51%
Loans

0.26%
Notes: The apportionment rate includes interest earned on the CalPERS Supplemental Pension Payment pursuant to Government Code 20825 (c)(1) and interest earned on the Wildfire Fund loan pursuant to Public Utility Code 3288 (a). *The percentage of administrative cost equals the total administrative cost divided by the quarterly interest earnings. The law provides that administrative costs are not to exceed 5% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund. However, if the 13-week Daily Treasury Bill Rate on the last day of the fiscal year is below 1%, then administrative costs shall not exceed 8% of quarterly EARNINGS of the fund for the subsequent fiscal year.

Source:
(1) State of California, Office of the Treasurer
(2) State of Calfiornia, Office of the Controller
PMIA Average Monthly
Effective Yields(1)
PMIA/LAIF Performance Report
as of 9/30/24
Daily rates are now available here. View PMIA Daily Rates Quarterly Performance
Quarter Ended 09/30/24
Chart does not include $1,368,000.00 in mortgages, which equates to 0.001%. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

Pooled Money Investment Account
Monthly Portfolio Composition (1)
9/30/24
$163.4 billion
27 CON

SENT CALENDAR

AGENDA ITEM

3. 22-993
28 STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting October 22, 2024
TO: Members of the City Council
SUBMITTED BY: Dante Hall, City Manager
Edwin Gato, Director of Finance
Kristi Carter, Human Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Approve Memorandum of Understanding with the Hercules Police Officers Association (HPOA).

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding with the Hercules Police Officers Association (HPOA).

DISCUSSION:

Existing Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and agreements with HPOA employees have terms that ended June 30, 2024. The City has been engaged in the meet and confer process as required by law with the represented employees and in a consultation process with non-represented employees. The City Council has provided the City’s labor negotiator with directions in closed sessions over the past few months. The City has agreed with the HPOA on a proposed one-year Memorandum of Understanding. A summary of the changes proposed by the HPOA employee groups is set forth below:

Employee Group Summary of Terms
Hercules Police Officers Association
(HPOA)
FY 2024-25
3% Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA) effective the
first full pay period following July 1, 2024.

MOU Term to June 30, 2025 (One-Year) One-time 5% of the employees gross annual salary earned in FY 2023-24 non-recurring, non-pensionable
retention payment.

Adjust bereavement leave from 24 to 40 hours
pursuant to AB 1949 and employees may use
accrued unused vacation or sick leave to extend their
bereavement leave up to a total of 56 hours.
22-993
29 FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of new labor-related items will result in ongoing and one-time costs. The proposed MOU covers one year. The ongoing and one -time employee costs covered by these approvals are illustrated below.

FY 2024-25

Group Annualized On-Going Costs One-Time Costs
HPOA $126,000 $165,000

The adopted FY 2024-25 Budget provides an amount for both ongoing and one-time costs of 3% Ongoing and 5% One-time Retention Payment. The long-term forecast projects a 3% increase in costs on an ongoing basis. Available ongoing and one -time monies are anticipated to be sufficient in FY 2024-25 to meet the obligations.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Memorandum of Understanding with Hercules POA (Redline Version)

3. Memorandum of Understanding with Hercules POA (Final Version)

30 HERCULES CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION
24-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERCULES APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING “MOU” WITH THE HERCULES POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2024, THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025

WHEREAS, the most recent agreement between the City of Hercules and the Hercules Police Officers Association (HPOA) expired on June 30, 2024;

WHEREAS, the City and the HPOA have been engaged in negotiations for a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU);

WHEREAS, the resulting MOU reflects a one-year package that will enable the City to provide reasonable workforce stability;

WHEREAS, the ongoing costs of approximately $126,000 (3% COLA) are included in the FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget and there is sufficient funding for the one-time costs of approximately $165,000 (5% One-Time Retention Pay).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager to sign and implement the Memo randum of Understanding with the Hercules Police Officers Association covering July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the 22nd day of October 2024 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Dan Romero, Mayor
ATTEST:

________________________________
Eibleis Melendez, City Clerk
31 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR
POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION

OF THE CITY OF HERCULES

Effective July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025
Per Resolution No. 24-xxx

July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025
32 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERCULES AND

THE HERCULES POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

ARTICLE I - RECOGNITION ........................................................................................................ 1 ARTICLE II - NONDISCRIMINATION ....................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE III - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITY ..................................... 1 A. Management Rights ................................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE IV - SUPPORT OF AGREEMENT .............................................................................. 2 ARTICLE V - LEAVES ..................................................................................................................... 3 A. Sick Leave ......................................................................................................................... 3 B. Authorized Leaves of Absence Without Pay ........................................................... 3 C. Unauthorized Leaves of Absence ............................................................................ 5 D. Jury Duty ................................................................................................................. 5 E. Military Leave .............................................................................................................. 5 F. Pregnancy Disability Leave ..................................................................................... 5 G. Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 ......................................................................... 6 H. Catastrophic Illness and Donations of Leave by Employees...................................... 6 I. Bereavement Leave ...................................................................................................... 6 ARTICLE VI - HOURS OF WORK ........................................................................................... 6 A. Work Assignment ........................................................................................................ 6

1. Hours of Work ............................................................................................ 6

2. Break Periods ................................................................................................... 7 B. Overtime .................................................................................................................. 7 C. Compensatory Time Off .......................................................................................... 7 D. On Call Pay ............................................................................................................. 7 E. Call Back Pay ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 8 F. Court Pay................................................................................................................. 8 G. Department Training .................................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE VII - VACATION PLAN ............................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE VIII - HOLIDAYS......................................................................................................... 10 A. Holidays ...................................................................................................................... 10 ARTICLE IX - GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................................................... 11 A. Payroll Deductions ..................................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE X - COMPENSATION ................................................................................................. 11 i
33 A. Salaries ........................................................................................................................ 11 B. Salary Upon Hire ................................................................................................... 12 C. Salary Step Advancement .......................................................................................... 12 D. Incentive Pay Plan ................................................................................................. 12 E. Education Reimbursement ......................................................................................... 13 F. Education Incentive Pay ........................................................................................ 14 G. Bilingual Pay ......................................................................................................... 14 H. Field Training Officer Pay Differential ................................................................. 14 I. Shift Differential…………………………………………………………………14 J. Assigned Positions……………………………………………………………….14 K.

Out-of-Class Work ............................................................................................................ 15

1. Officer in Charge ........................................................................................... 15

2. Acting Commander ................................................................................... 15

3. Acting Chief of Police ............................................................................... 15 L. Uniforms ..................................................................................................................... 15

1. New Employees ............................................................................................. 15

2. Uniform Allowance ....................................................................................... 16 M. Work-Out Pay ....................................................................................................... 16 N. K-9 Differential .......................................................................................................... 16 O. Longevity Pay ....................................................................................................... 16 P. Assigned Take-Home Department Vehicles ............................................................. 17 Q. Assigned Position - Corporal ..................................................................................... 17 R. Computer Loan Program ........................................................................................... 17 ARTICLE XI - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN ............................................................ 17 ARTICLE XII - EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN ............................................................ 17 ARTICLE XIII - MEDICAL AND INSURANCE BENEFITS .................................................. 18 A. Medical.................................................................................................................. 18

1. Medical Redirect ............................................................................................ 21

2. Vision/Dental ................................................................................................. 21 B. Dental and Orthodontic .............................................................................................. 21 C. Vision .......................................................................................................................... 21 D. Other Insurance Benefits ........................................................................................... 22

1. Long-Term Disability ................................................................................ 22

2. Life ................................................................................................................. 22

3. Accidental Death and Dismemberment ........................................................ 22 E. Vantage Care Retiree Health Savings Program ........................................................ 22 ARTICLE XIV - LAY-OFF POLICY AND PROCEDURE ..................................................... 22 A. Discretion of City .................................................................................................. 22 B. Notification ................................................................................................................. 22 C. Vacancy and Demotion ......................................................................................... 22 D. Employee Rights ................................................................................................... 23 E. Seniority ................................................................................................................ 23 F. Employment Status .................................................................................................... 23 34 G. Re-employment List ....................................................................................................... 23 H. Duration of Re-employment List .................................................................................. 24 ARTICLE XV - OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT AND OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES ....................... 24 A. General Prohibition .................................................................................................... 24 B. Definition .............................................................................................................. 24 C. Chief of Police’s Approval ........................................................................................ 25 D. Retroactive and Prospective Application ............................................................... 25 E. Grievance Authority .............................................................................................. 25 F. Penalty for Violation of this Section ..................................................................... 25 ARTICLE XVI - DISCIPLINARY ACTION PROCEDURES .................................................. 25 A. Applicability of This Section ................................................................................. 25 B. Grounds for Discipline ............................................................................................... 25 C. Delegation of Disciplinary Action ......................................................................... 26 D. Types of Discipline ............................................................................................... 26

1. Written Reprimand ........................................................................................ 27

2. Suspension ..................................................................................................... 27

3. Demotion ................................................................................................... 28

4. Reduction in Pay ....................................................................................... 28

5. Discharge ....................................................................................................... 28 E. Disciplinary Appeal Process ...................................................................................... 28 ARTICLE XVII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ......................................................................... 33 A. Definitions .................................................................................................................. 33 B. General Provisions ..................................................................................................... 33 C. Procedures .................................................................................................................. 34

1. Level I - Information/Resolution .................................................................. 34

2. Level II - Formal Written Grievance ......................................................... 34

3. Level III - Appeal to the Chief of Police ................................................... 35

4. Level IV - Advisory Mediation ................................................................. 35

5. Level V - Appeal to the City Manager ...................................................... 36 ARTICLE XVIII - WAIVER CLAUSE ........................................................................................ 37 ARTICLE XIX - SEVERABILITY ................................................................................................ 37 ARTICLE XX - DURATION .......................................................................................................... 37 ARTICLE XXI - PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS ............................................. 37 SIGNATURE PAGE ......................................................................................................................... 38 35 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERCULES AND

THE HERCULES POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION

This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into pursuant to the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Government Code section 3500 et seq). Parties to this Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU” herein) are the City of Hercules (“City” herein) and the Hercules Police Officers Association (“Association” herein). The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment of the employees represented by the Association and have exchanged freely information, opinions and proposals and have endeavored to reach an agreement on matters relating to the employment, conditions, and employee relations of such employees.

This Memorandum of Understanding shall be presented to the City Council as a joint recommendation of the undersigned for salary, fringe benefits, and other working conditions for the period of July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025, and shall be in full force and effect at such date as herein prescribed, on ratification by both the City Council and affected members of the Police Association.

ARTICLE I - RECOGNITION

The City recognizes the Association as the exclusive representative of the full-time sworn employees of the Hercules Police Department in the classifications of Sergeant and Police Officer.

Said recognition herein shall remain in full force and effect unless decertified according to procedures adopted in conformity with State law. The provisions of this article shall not preclude any individual representing him/herself in matters of employer/employee relations.

ARTICLE II - NONDISCRIMINATION

No bargaining unit members represented by the Association shall be reduced or removed, or in any way favored or discriminated against because of race, sex, national origin, or religion.

Neither the City nor the Association shall interfere with, intimidate, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against bargaining unit members because of the exercise of their rights to engage or not to engage in employee organization activities pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 et seq.

ARTICLE III - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITY

1. Management Rights

- The City retains all its exclusive rights and authority under State law and expressly and exclusively retains its management rights, which include, but are not limited to:

- The exclusive right to determine the mission and organization of its constituent departments and commissions;
36 - Set standards and levels of service;

- Determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment and promotions;

- Establish and effect administrative regulations consistent with laws and the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding to direct its employees;

- Maintain the efficiency of governmental operations;

- Determine the methods, means, and numbers and kinds of personnel by which governmental operations are to be conducted;

- Determine methods of financing;

- Determine and/or change the facilities, methods, technology, means, organizational structures, and size and composition of the work force and allocate and assign work by which the City operations are to be conducted;

- Determine and change the numbers of locations, relocations, and types of operations, processes and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions;

- Discharge, suspend, demote, reprimand, withhold salary increases and benefits, or otherwise discipline employees in accordance with applicable law;

- Take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies;

- Exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work; and

- Take actions as are in the interest of effective service to the community.

The City maintains the right to use qualified volunteers or reserves in the Police Department. Use of said individuals shall be in accordance with State law and Police Department regulations.

ARTICLE IV - SUPPORT OF AGREEMENT

During the term of this agreement, the City agrees not to negotiate with any organization other than the Police Officers Association or its designated representatives on matters on which the Association is the exclusive representative and which is within its scope of representation. The Association agrees to negotiate only with the representatives officially designated by the City to act on its behalf.

The Association is given a bank of 120 hours for Association business during the term of this MOU.
37 ARTICLE V - LEAVES

A. Sick Leave

1. The City provides paid sick leave benefits for all full-time sworn employees. Sick leave accrues at the rate of eight (8) hours per month for each month in which an employee has worked a minimum of 96 hours. The maximum accrual of sick leave is 2,080 hours. The City does not pay employees for unused sick leave upon termination for any reason.

Sick leave may be taken by an employee only under the following circumstances:

- When sickness prevents performance of services, functions, or duties;

- In the event of a serious illness to a member of the employee’s immediate family (defined as the employee’s spouse, parent, step-parent, brother, sister, child, step child, domestic partner, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sister-in-law, brother-in-law, grandparent, grandchild or legal guardian); or for a scheduled medical or dental appointment for the employee or the employee’s dependent children, in the event that the appointment requires the employee to be absent from work.

In requesting sick leave, members must notify, or make reasonable effort to notify, the watch commander four (4) hours prior to the member’s work shift. The City may require an employee to submit a doctor’s excuse for sick leave under the following circumstances:

- More than two (2) consecutive sick leave days taken by the employee.

- With prior notification of the employee.

In cases where an employee’s request for sick leave would normally be approved, but there is no sick leave accrual available, then the absence shall be charged against the available vacation or compensatory time balance. If there is no such vacation or compensatory time available, then the time off shall be recorded as an authorized unpaid Leave of Absence. An employee claiming for long-term disability benefits shall not be required to first exhaust paid leave.

If an employee’s death is duty-related, his beneficiary shall be entitled to reimbursement for all that officer’s accumulated unused sick leave.

B. Authorized Leaves of Absence Without Pay

1. Requesting Leave

Upon the recommendation of the Chief of Police, the City Manager may, in his or 38 her discretion, grant an employee an unpaid Leave of Absence not to exceed three (3) months. Employees desiring to take time off without pay who have no leave balances available shall submit a request in writing to the Chief of Police. Whenever possible, such request shall be submitted at least five (5) weeks in advance .

2. Extension of Leaves

During the period of the Leave of Absence, an employee may request that the leave be extended by submitting such a request in writing to the City Manager stating the reason for the extension. Such a request may be approved or disapproved by the City Manager as described in the above section. No Leaves of Absence exceeding one (1) year may be granted under any circumstances.

3. Early Return From Leaves of Absence

An employee may request permission from the City Manager to return to work prior to the approved expiration of the leave. Approval of the City Manager for such early returns is discretionary.

4. Failure to Return to Work From Leave of Absence

Failure of an employee to return to work on the approved date is grounds for disciplinary action up to and including dismissal.

5. Benefits During Leaves of Absence

Employees on leave of absence may continue their medical and insurance benefit coverage by reimbursing the City directly for the amount of the insurance premiums in advance. Such reimbursement must be made in advance by the 30th day of the preceding month for the subsequent month for each month in which the employee wishes to receive coverage. Should the employee fail to submit payment on a timely basis, the Personnel Department will send the employee a reminder notice. Coverage in any plan will be dropped if the employee is more than 30 days late in making a premium payment.

6. Status of Employee on Authorized Leave of Absence

a. An authorized Leave of Absence does not represent a break in employment for a full time sworn employee. Such an employee retains all accrued vacation, sick leave, and other rights as exist at the time the Leave of Absence begins.

However, only active full-time service shall count towards accumulated seniority or toward benefits, which accrue according to length of service (including vacation and sick leave). Vacation, sick leave, holiday, and merit salary increases do not accrue to an employee on leave during the period of such leave.
39 b. An employee returning from Leave of Absence shall return to the same salary step or relative placement in the pay range existing at the time the employee returns to work.

C. Unauthorized Leaves of Absence

Any unauthorized Leave of Absence may be cause for disciplinary action.

D. Jury Duty

The City provides jury duty leave with pay for all sworn employees who are called upon to serve for court jury duty according to the following provisions:

1. An employee called for jury duty should immediately notify the Chief of Police by providing the jury summons indicating the date, time, and place.

2. An employee may either remain in regular pay status and turn over to the City all jury duty wages (less mileage allowance if provided by the Court), or may take vacation leave, compensatory time off, or authorized Leave of Absence without pay and retain all jury duty wages.

E. Military Leave

Military Leave of Absence shall be granted within the provisions of State law.

F. Pregnancy Disability Leave

1. Employees are entitled to use sick leave, accrued vacation and/or compensatory time off for disabilities caused or contributed to by pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth, and recovery therefrom on the same terms and conditions governing Leaves of Absence for other temporary illness or medical disability.

2. Such leave shall not be used for childcare, child rearing, or preparation for childbearing, but shall be limited to those disabilities as set forth above.

3. The length of such disability leave, including the date on which the leave shall commence and the date on which the duties are to be resumed, shall be determined by the employee and the employee’s physician; however, the Personnel Department may require a verification of the extent of disability through a physical examination of the employee by a physician appointed by the City at City expense.

4. Employees are entitled to leave without pay or other benefits for disabilities because of pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth, or recovery therefrom when sick leave has been exhausted on the same terms and conditions applicable to other temporary illness or medical disability.
40 5. The employee on pregnancy disability leave shall be returned to an equivalent position within her classification.

G. Family Medical Leave Act of 1993

1. The City shall provide eligible employees with family care leave in accordance with the Federal Family Medical and Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA). Under FMLA and the CFRA, eligible employees may take up to twelve (12) weeks of unpaid leave; however, employees must first use accrued vacation and compensatory time leave.

H. Catastrophic Illness and Donations of Leave by Employees

1. HPOA members may participate in the City of Hercules Catastrophic Illness Plan as donors and receivers of hours.

I. Bereavement Leave

Paid bereavement leave of up to 40 hours shall be provided to employees in the event of a death in the immediate family of the employee. In addition to the 40 hours of paid bereavement leave, employees may use accrued unused vacation or sick leave to extend their bereavement leave up to a total of 56 hours. At the discretion of the City Manager, additional time may be taken as vacation, sick leave or unpaid leave.

Immediate family of an employee is defined as: parents, step-parents, parent-in-laws, spouse, domestic partner, child, step child, brother, sister, grandparents, grandchildren, brother/sister in-law, son/daughter-in-law or legal guardian.

In special cases, the City Manager may approve a leave of absence for bereavement in other circumstances.

ARTICLE VI - HOURS OF WORK

A. Work Assignment

Full-time employees shall be assigned to a shift designated by the Chief of Police after a meet and confer with the HPOA on the number of days and hours equaling eighty (80) hours per two week period at such times as designated by the Chief of Police.

1. Hours of Work

a. Effective January 1, 1996, the City designated a 7(k) exemption under FLSA of one hundred and seventy-one (171) hours per 28-day period as the standard work period.
41 2. Break Periods

Employees shall receive one (1) fifteen-minute break during the mid-portion of each four-hour block of time. In addition, employees shall receive allowance of forty-five minutes for meals during each shift of duty. If an employee does not receive at least thirty minutes for meal break during a shift, he/she shall be paid compensation for forty-five minutes at a time and one-half (1-1/2) rate.

B. Overtime

1. All employees required to work in excess of their regularly assigned shift shall receive compensation at the rate of time and one-half (1-1/2) of the employee’s regular base rate of pay for each additional quarter hour of work performed.

2. An employee required to work in excess of 171 hours per 28-day period shall receive time and one-half (1-1/2) of the employee’s regular base rate plus, if assigned shift differential, Officer-In-Charge (OIC) pay, Field Training Officer pay, and education incentive pay.

3. Overtime shall be earned and recorded in quarters (1/4th) of an hour increments rounded to the nearest quarter (1/4th) of an hour.

C. Compensatory Time Off

In lieu of receiving cash payment at the regular rate of pay (Section B) for overtime hours worked, an employee may elect the option of taking compensatory time off (CTO).

Compensatory time off shall be earned at the rate of time and one-half for each hour worked. Compensatory time off must be requested by the employee when submitting an overtime slip. No more than two hundred forty (240) hours of compensatory time off may be accumulated. Compensatory time off must be scheduled with the advance approval of the Chief of Police or his/her designee. Use of accumulated compensatory time off shall follow the current guidelines provided by the United States Department of Labor.

D. On Call Pay

Detectives and other employees who are required to remain on call or on court telephone standby by the Chief of Police or his/her designee shall be restricted from traveling to any location which would preclude his/her return to duty within one-half hour and shall be required to maintain the ability to be contacted by phone at all times. Employees shall be compensated at the following rate:

$50.00 per weekday
$55.00 per weekend day
$60.00 per holiday

Detectives shall have full use of a take-home City vehicle while on call. 42 E. Call Back Pay

When an officer is called back to duty by a supervisor, that officer shall be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times his/her regular hourly rate. Any compensation for being called back to duty shall cease after the officer is relieved from duty by his/her supervisor.

Any employee represented by the Association who is called back in accordance with this article shall be compensated for a minimum of four (4) hours. The City and the Association agree that the intent of this Article is to compensate employees who are called back to duty on an emergency or urgent basis, or for department meetings, training, or City business, and that this Article shall not apply if “call back” work hours are contiguous either prior to or at the end of the employee’s normally assigned shift. If an employee receives, less than eight (8) hours notice to return to duty for hours that are contiguous and prior to the normally assigned shift, the minimum shall apply.

F. Court Pay

An employee shall be entitled to receive compensation for a court appearance as a witness subpoenaed by the City, the State of California, or the United States, as follows:

1. Court appearances made while on-duty shall constitute normal hours of work.

2. In the event a court appearance extends beyond the end of the officer’s regularly assigned shift, such time spent in court will be treated as normal work time for the purpose of computing the officer’s overtime compensation.

3. Employees required to appear in court during their off-duty time shall be paid as follows:

a. Morning Session Only: Employees shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation at the appropriate rate. Time in excess of the minimum compensation shall be on an actual time basis at time and one-half (1-1/2).

b. Afternoon Session Only: Employees shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation. Time in excess of the minimum compensation shall be on an actual time basis at time and one-half (1-1/2).

c. Morning and Afternoon Sessions: When an employee is required to be present at both a morning and an afternoon court or attorney conference, the employee shall receive overtime compensation for the actual time spent in court from the time of arrival until dismissed by the court including lunch recesses.

d. Afternoon and Evening Sessions: When an employee is required to be present at both an afternoon and an evening court or attorney conference, the employee shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation for the afternoon session. When the employee is released from court one (1) or 43 more hours prior to the start of the evening session, or the evening session is scheduled for a court in a different city than that of the afternoon session, the employee shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation for the evening session.

e. In the event the time spent in court extends into the beginning of the employee’s regularly scheduled work shift, time spent in court shall be deemed ended at the time such shift is scheduled to begin for the purpose of computing the employee’s overtime compensation.

f. Compensation for court pay is subject to the employee submitting the appropriate form reflecting the beginning and ending time of the court appearance.

If a morning court appearance is canceled with six (6) hours or less notice provided to the employee or an afternoon appearance is canceled with two (2) hours or less notice provided to the employee, the employee shall be compensated for one (1) hour pay at the overtime rate.

G. Department Training

1. For the purpose of department scheduled training, work assignments shall not be modified with less than seven (7) calendar days notice or upon mutual agreement by the employee and the Chief of Police or designee.

2. Training Hours: Any training of six (6) hours or more shall be considered a full shift; less than six (6) hours, the employee shall be required to return to duty on that shift.

3. Any travel time that is outside the work assignment and in excess of the employee’s normal commute is subject to compensation by The City. The City will compensate employees for travel time to training through an established Travel Time Guide.

ARTICLE VII - VACATION PLAN

A. Accrual Rate and Accumulation

The City provides paid vacation benefits for all full-time employees. Vacation shall be paid at the regular rate of pay earned at the time of vacation is commenced. The amount of annual paid vacation accrual is based on the number of years of full-time service based on total time in public service for each member. Existing designated employees may qualify as being eligible for this provision on a forward going basis. The vacation accrual is as follows:

- Start to 4 years of service – 96 hours annually
- 5 to 9 years of service – 120 hours annually
44 - 10 to 15 years of service – 144 hours annually
- 16 to 19 years of service – 160 hours annually
- 20 years plus of service – 176 hours annually

The maximum vacation balance which may be accumulated is 280 hours. When an employee reaches this maximum balance, no additional earned vacation is added to his/her account. The maximum amount of vacation accrual which may be added to the vacation balance in any one (1) year is the amount earned during the year less forty (40) hours.

No vacation leave may be earned by an employee while he/she is on Leave of Absence. In addition, an employee may not take vacation during his/her first six (6) full months of employment.

When an employee is terminated for any reason, he/she shall be entitled to all vacation pay earned and accumulated up to and including the effective date of the termination.

B. Vacation Sell Back

Consistent with City policy, employees may sell back up to 40 hours of their accrued unused vacation annually, once during each fiscal year. Employees will only be allowed to cash-out a maximum of 40 hours of vacation, provided that after doing so it leaves them with at least 40 hours of vacation and/or compensatory time on the books and 40 hours of sick leave at the time of cash- out.

ARTICLE VIII - HOLIDAYS

A. Holidays

The City provides paid time off for all full-time permanent employees for thirteen (13) holidays per year. Payment for holidays shall be as follows:

- Employees not receiving extra days off for City holidays shall be compensated for holidays in the pay period in which the holiday falls. - Employees who are not assigned to a uniformed position shall continue to have the option of working the designated City Holiday schedule and thus receive the above holiday compensation. The decision to work the holiday schedule will be a yearly one and must be declared to the finance department prior to the start of the fiscal year. Those employees that choose not to work the City Holiday schedule and receive compensation in the form of time off shall not receive financial compensation for the days off as outlined in Article VIII on this MOU. - Employees separated from City service before June 1 or December 1 shall be entitled to receive holiday pay at the rate of one (1) holiday for each month that the employee was in paid status through the first pay period of the month, e.g., employees who separate on or after the 16th of March shall be entitled to three (3) 45 holidays at eight (8) hours straight time; employees who separate from City service before the 16th of March shall be entitled to two (2) holidays at straight time.

- Each POA member will be allocated floating holiday hours. The number of hours will be determined by the holiday schedule issued by the City Manager for the city offices. Each member may select these floating holidays, subject to the requirement that their supervisor must approve requests for time off that do not incur a cost to the city. Floating holidays are provided for annually on each fiscal year (July 1 – June 30) and cannot be carried forward each year.

- Proclaimed Holidays

 Independence Day
 Labor Day
 Veterans' Day
 Thanksgiving Day
 Day After Thanksgiving
 Christmas Eve Day
 Christmas Day
 New Year's Day
 Martin Luther King Day
 President's Day
 Memorial Day
 Two Floating Holidays

If any of these Holidays fall on a Sunday, the Monday following shall be observed as the holiday. If any of these Holidays fall on a Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the Holiday.

To be eligible for Holiday pay, employees must have worked the workday before and the workday after the Holiday, or be in approved paid leave status the workday before and the work day after the Holiday.

ARTICLE IX - GENERAL PROVISIONS

A. Payroll Deductions

The City shall grant payroll deductions for membership dues to the Association.

ARTICLE X - COMPENSATION

A. Salaries

46 The salaries in Table 1 below include a three percent (3%) base wage increase, effective the first full pay period after June 30, 2024.

TABLE 1

July 1, 2024 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
Police Officer $8,853.80 $9,119.43 $9,393.00 $9,674.81 $9,965.06 $10,264.01 Police Sergeant $10,466.36 $10,780.34 $11,103.77 $11,436.86 $11,779.94 $12,133.38

1. Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2024, all bargaining unit members will be required to participate in the City’s Direct Deposit program for all regular paychecks.

All members of the bargaining unit shall receive a one-time, non-recurring, non-pensionable retention payment of five percent (5%) of their gross annual salary earned in FY 2023-24. The retention payment shall be paid in the second pay period following ratification by both parties of the successor agreement.

Members may elect to direct the retention payment to their Deferred Compensation Plan if desired.

B. Salary Upon Hire

A. Police Officer Trainees, while at the Police Academy and who have not graduated from the Police Academy, shall be compensated at a rate of ten percent (10%) less than Step 1 of the range for Police Officer.

C. Salary Step Advancement

It is the responsibility of the City to establish appropriate standards of performance for employees and to review employees’ performance in meeting established standards. Employees will be evaluated as to whether the employee meets standards, exceeds standards, or fails to meet standards. Employees evaluated as meeting or exceeding standards overall will receive a salary step advancement to the next salary step until the employee reaches the top step of the salary range. For employees hired on or after July 1, 1990, the salary step advancement shall become effective the first pay period following the employee’s anniversary date. Excepted from this provision shall be those employees whose anniversary date falls on the first day of the pay period. An employee evaluated as failing to meet standards overall will receive no salary step advancement and such an employee’s evaluation will indicate the specific areas of improvement needed in order to meet standards overall; such an evaluation may be appealed initially to the Chief of Police and then, if desired, to the City Manager 47 whose determination shall be final.

An employee evaluated as failing to meet standards overall will receive a follow-up evaluation not less than three (3) months nor more than six (6) months following the initial evaluation and will be granted a salary step advancement at that time if the employee’s performance is rated as meeting or exceeding standards overall.

Employees are eligible for further salary step advancement twelve (12) months following their previous salary step advancement, except as provided in B, 1, above. When an employee demonstrates an outstanding level of performance in the opinion of the Chief of Police, the employee may be evaluated and awarded salary step advancement, even though twelve (12) months have not elapsed since the employee’s previous salary step advancement.

The evaluation will be discussed with the employee and space will be provided on the evaluation form for the employee’s comments. The employee will be given a copy of the evaluation.

The HPOA salary schedule will consist of six steps, with each additional step above #1 receiving an additional 3% of salary.

D. Incentive Pay Plan

HPOA employees will be eligible for the same incentive plan that the rest of the City employees have. The City will meet and confer with HPOA on the formulation of this policy.

E. Education Reimbursement

An employee who is enrolled in a technical/vocational, an associate of arts, bachelor’s, or master’s degree program which the City determines is in a job-related field may receive reimbursement for tuition and books in an amount not to exceed three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) per fiscal year. The Chief of Police, the Human Resources Department and the City Manager must approve the reimbursement prior to enrollment.

Evidence of a grade of “C” or better – or, if no grade is given, successful completion of the course – shall be required as a condition of obtaining reimbursement. There will be a total of $30,000 dollar annual allocation in the Education Reimbursement Program for all City employee groups. A POA member who is enrolled in a degree program and has received reimbursement monies the prior year will have priority and cannot be bumped from the program by a member who did not receive a reimbursement the prior fiscal year.

F. Education Incentive Pay

Extra compensation for possession of POST certificates and/or college degrees shall be provided pursuant to the following schedule:
48 A. Intermediate POST Certificate: 3.5% of base wage; B. Associate of Arts Degree: 4% of base wage;
C. Advanced POST Certificate: 4.5% of base wage;
D. Bachelor of Arts Degree: 5% of base wage.

An employee shall only be eligible for one of the foregoing education incentive payments.

G. Bilingual Pay

Effective July 1, 2019, an employee certified as bilingual shall receive an additional premium of 1% of base wage per month if he or she is certified as bilingual as follows:

A. The employee has the demonstrated ability to translate Spanish, Chinese or Tagalog into English and vice versa, both in writing and verbally, established by passing a proficiency test administered by the City’s Human Resources representative or its designee; and,

B. The employee and department head certify that the employee’s bilingual skills are desired by the department, and the employee may be called upon when necessary to translate communications as required by the department head.

H. Field Training Officer Pay Differential
An employee who is assigned as a Field Training Officer will be paid an additional five percent (5%) of his/her salary for actual time spent as a Field Training Officer. This differential shall also apply to the Field Training Sergeant.

I. Shift Differential
The City agrees to pay a differential of three percent (3%) of base salary for officers and sergeants assigned to swing and/or relief swing and five percent (5%) of base salary for officers and sergeants assigned to the graveyard shift. The differential shall be available only to those employees actually performing duties on the covered shifts.

J. Assigned Positions
The City agrees to pay sworn employees designated to work a regular assigned position including Administrative Sergeant, Investigative Sergeant, and Training Sergeant, excluding patrol, an additional five percent (5%) of his/her base salary. This differential does not include sworn employees temporarily assigned to the position.

Sworn employees temporarily assigned shall have the work schedule adjusted to include a paid lunch. Officers receiving Specialty Pay incentive will retain pay incentive even when working shifts not related to the Specialty Pay.

49 K. Out-of-Class Work

a. Officer in Charge

During the absences of regular supervisors, a sworn officer shall be designated as Officer-in-Charge (OIC) to handle field supervision or station responsibilities as required. The OIC shall be compensated at a rate which is five percent (5%) above said employee’s existing salary rate for every hour worked in such temporary service. Any out-of-class work for which premium compensation is provided requires advanced written approval of the Chief of Police, or his or her designee.

b. Acting Commander

An employee who is appointed Acting Commander shall receive an hourly rate equal to five percent (5%) above said employee’s existing salary rate for every hour worked in such temporary assignment. Any out-of-class work for which premium compensation is provided requires advanced written approval of the Chief of Police, or his or her designee.

c. Acting Chief of Police

An employee who is appointed Acting Chief of Police shall receive an hourly rate equal to ten percent (10%) above said employee’s existing salary rate for every hour worked in such temporary appointment. Any out-of-class work for which premium compensation is provided requires advanced written approval of the Chief of Police, or his or her designee.

L. Uniforms

a. New Employees

The City shall provide all new members with a uniform which includes three (3) short sleeve shirts, three (3) long sleeve shirts, three (3) pants, one (1) tie, one (1) hat, and leathers and rain gear, as determined by the Chief of Police and as approved by the City Manager. The City shall also provide safety equipment, including weapons, ammunition, and body armor vest, as determined necessary by the Chief of Police and as approved by the City Manager. Each employee is responsible for the care, maintenance, and replacement of such uniforms. The City shall reimburse employees for the cost of serviceable uniforms damaged in the course of employment. In addition, each employee is responsible for the care and maintenance of the issued safety equipment.

b. Uniform Allowance

50 The City will compensate each employee an additional $75.00 per month ($900.00 annually) as payment for such maintenance and replacement. Such compensation shall be made semi-annually during the second pay period in January and the second pay period in July. Due to the retention payment mentioned in Article X.A.1, the July Uniform Allowance will be deferred to the first pay period in August of 2017.

Payment shall be made by a separate check and not as part of a regular paycheck.

Employees shall become eligible to receive the first semi-annual payment following their first anniversary date. With respect to the time between the employee’s first anniversary date and the semi-annual payment, the allowance will be prorated on a monthly basis with an employee having to work more than sixteen (16) days to receive payment for that month. The uniform allowance is considered a prospective payment and there shall be no payment or reimbursement upon separation from City service.

M. Work-Out

During the term of this MOU, the City and the Association agree to explore establishing an on-site gym to allow for possible work-out release time for officers.

N. K-9 Differential

An employee who is assigned as a K-9 officer will be paid an additional five percent (5%) of her/his salary.

O. Longevity Pay

Hercules Police Officer’s longevity pay is calculated as a percentage of their salary and the City will make the payments in 26 bi-weekly installments. Existing designated employees may qualify as being eligible for this provision on a forward going basis. The calculations are based on total public service sworn time and will be as follows in addition to the employee’s base salary:

At 5 years of service: 2 %
At 10 years of service: 4 %
At 15 years of service: 6 %
At 20 years of service: 8 %
At 25 years of service: 10%

P. Assigned Take-Home Department Vehicles

Employees holding certain specialized assignments may be assigned take-home City vehicles. These include City owned and City rented vehicles. Employees assigned take- home vehicles are not considered on duty and eligible for compensation for time spent driving to and from work in their City vehicle. Employees may be considered on duty and eligible for compensation when engaging in a law enforcement action while driving to or 51 from work.

Q. Assigned Position – Corporal

An employee who appointed Corporal will be paid an additional five percent (5%) of his/her base salary as described in Section K. This amount is intended to cover the additional effort and responsibilities associated with this position and will be paid to the employee during the entire period they serve in this assignment, whether or not they are working under the supervision of a police sergeant or have an assigned trainee.

This position incorporates the duties previously performed on an as needed basis by the Officer in Charge (OIC) and Field Training Officer (FTO) specialized assignments.

Employees who are not assigned Corporals may only perform OIC and FTO duties if they are on the current Corporal list and have the approval of the Patrol Division Commander.

R. Computer Loan Program

Eligible Employees: Regular full time employees that have completed their initial one-year probation period with the City. Employee must maintain a balance of up to 40 hours of vacation and/or compensatory time until the loan is paid in full. The hours employee must maintain will vary on the amount borrowed.

Maximum Loan Amount: The City will loan employees a maximum of $2,500 for the purchase of computer hardware and software. Employees may not have more than one loan outstanding at any time. If the purchase exceeds $2,500, the remainder of the purchase price is the employee’s responsibility. No interest will be charged by the City under this program.

ARTICLE XI - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

Voluntary employee contributions may be made to the Deferred Compensation Plan through an authorized payroll deduction from the employee’s salary.

ARTICLE XII - EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

Members hired on or before 6/30/2011 shall receive the 3% at 50 PERS retirement formula through their employment with the City of Hercules to include final year compensation One Year Final Compensation pursuant to Section 20024.2 of the California Government Code. Members hired after 6/30/2011 but before 01/01/2013 shall receive the 3% at 55 PERS retirement formula through their employment with the City of Hercules to include final year compensation One Year Final Compensation pursuant to Section 20024.2 of the California Government Code. Members agree to pay the employee’s portion of nine percent (9%) pre-tax under the PERS Plan. In the event that the contribution amount is increased above the nine percent (9%) amount, the parties agree to meet and confer on the additional payment. Effective with the pay period beginning November 4, 2018, safety members will pay an additional 3% to be applied to the Employer CalPERS Contribution Rate.

52 The current MOU requires that the member employee pay the full member contribution effective July 1, 2011. Section 414(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code allows the public agency who is a member of PERS to designate employee retirement contributions required by the MOU, as being picked up by the employer and treated as employer contributions for tax purposes.

Members hired on or after 01/01/2013 shall receive the 2.7% at 57 PERS retirement formula, shall contribute 50% of the total annual normal cost of their pension benefit to the pension plan as determined by the City’s actuary and shall have their final compensation based on the employee’s highest annual compensation earnable averaged over a consecutive 36-month period. The City and members agree that all the provisions of AB 340 and AB 197 will be followed. Effective with the pay period beginning November 4, 2018, safety members will pay an additional 3% to be applied to the Employer CalPERS Contribution Rate.

An employee who retires may convert his/her unused sick leave balance to service credit as provided by Government Code Section 20965. If an employee elects to convert their entire balance of sick leave to service credit they must notify the City at least one year prior to the date of retirement.

The Association shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses or liability including, but not limited to, liability for back taxes, and all claims of any type by the IRS, Franchise Tax Board, Unit members or their heirs, successors or assigns arising out of this Agreement to pay or partially pay or "pick-up" an employee's contribution to PERS.

ARTICLE XIII - MEDICAL AND INSURANCE BENEFITS

A. Medical

1. The City contribution to the PERS health plan on behalf of all active and retired employees shall be minimum established by CalPERS which for the 2019 calendar year is $139.00.

2. Active employees shall commence cost sharing starting in calendar year 2020 based on a dollar amount equal to the premium of the Kaiser Bay Area Region plan as follow:

2020 Calendar Year

The City contribution shall be the 2019 Kaiser Bay Area Region plan rate plus the first 3% increase in cost. The Employee shall pay up to the next 3% increase in cost, with the City responsible for anything above a total of 6%.

2021 Calendar Year

The City contribution shall be its share of the 2020 Kaiser Bay Area Region plan rate 53 plus the first 3% increase in cost. The Employee shall pay up to the next 3% increase in cost, with the City responsible for anything above a total of 6%.

(For example, the City would only contribute an amount equal to the premium of the Kaiser Bay Area Region plan employee only coverage.)

3. If the employee chooses a plan where the premium exceeds the amount allowed, such excess shall be paid by the employee.

4. If the employee chooses a plan, which has a lower premium than the amount allowed, the employee shall not receive the difference in cash.

5. Supplemental Optional Monies Allowance for Retirees:

Eligibility

The City will provide an optional monetary allowance currently in the amount of $334.70 per month with an annual three percent adjustment on January 1st of each year to employees who retire as regulated by the Public Employee’s Retirement System. To be eligible for the optional monies, an employee must retire as follows:

1. Service Retirement: Employees who have served the City for at least ten (10) years prior to retirement and are at least fifty (50) years old when they separate service from the City.

2. Disability Retirement: Employees who retire with a disability retirement are not required to be a certain age, but must have at least twenty (20) years of service with the City.

To be eligible for the optional money allowance, employees must also have the minimum amount of sick leave on the books, as outlined in the chart below. If an employee has below the amount of sick leave required for their years of service, then they will only be eligible for the percentage paid equivalent to the amount of sick leave they do have on the books.

Additionally, employees must retire within one hundred twenty (120) days of separation from City employment to be eligible to receive the optional money allowance.

Years of Service Amount of sick leave hours on the
books on the day employee separates
service
Percentage of Optional Money
Available
10 480 50
11 528 55
12 576 60
13 624 65
14 672 70
54 15 720 75
16 768 80
17 846 85
18 864 90
19 912 95
20 960 100

21 960 100
22 960 100
23 960 100
24 960 100
25 No minimum amount required 100

Employees who separate service from the City of Hercules, but do not retire as a PERS annuitant within 120 days of separation, shall not be eligible for medical retirement under this program.

Retiree Reaches Age 65

The City will pay a portion of the optional money to a retiree until the retiree reaches age 65, upon which they are required to enroll in Medicare. At that time, the optional money will drop to an amount equivalent to the Kaiser Supplemental to Medicare rate through PERS. The retiree will be eligible for the same percentage of the Supplemental Optional Monies as they were eligible for under the Basic Optional Monies plan. Employees who are not eligible for Medicare must provide the City proof that they are not eligible for Medicare, either through their own employment history or their spouse and after providing such proof, the city will continue to pay the percentage of the Basic Optional Monies Plan. If proof is not provided, the City will automatically begin paying the Supplemental Optional Monies Plan percentages.

This benefit, which is effective January 1, 2001, is expected to last into perpetuity. The funds being established for this program may not be used by the City or HPOA for any purpose other than what is expressly stated in this section of the MOU. If in the future the City and HPOA mutually agree to end or modify this benefit, they can do so only for active employees. Any retiree who is currently receiving this benefit will continue to receive the benefit as stated in the MOU that was in effect at the time of their retirement. Conversely, if the City and HPOA increase this benefit, they can do so only for active employees and retiree benefits will remain the same as it was when they retired.

The City shall provide to the HPOA an annual statement of prior year balances in the medical retirement fund no later than December 31st of each year.

Payment

Payment will be made on a bi-annual basis. The optional money allowance for the months of January through June will be made the third week in July; July through December will 55 be paid the third week in January of each year. Checks will be mailed to the address on file. Supplemental Optional Money payments are subject to applicable Federal and State Income Tax regulations.

1. Medical Redirect - If an employee elects for no health coverage, and can demonstrate to the City on an annual basis that the employee has alterative health care coverage; the employee shall be entitled to use 50% of their eligible contribution to the compensation of their choice.

2. Vision/Dental - The City agrees that it will continue to pay the full premium for VSP and Delta Dental Insurance for the employee and their immediate family members if Medical Redirect option is exorcised by the employee.

B. Dental and Orthodontic

The City shall pay the premium for Delta Dental Plan, including orthodontic benefits, coverage for full-time employees plus eligible dependents.

Benefit summary:
 The City will provide Dental Insurance with a maximum benefit of $1,500 of coverage per calendar year for each family member.
 The City will provide 50% Orthodontic coverage with a lifetime maximum of $2,500 for each eligible family member.

C. Vision

The City has contracted with Vision Service Plan (VSP) in order to offer vision benefits to employees and eligible dependents. The City shall pay the premium for the VSP benefit for full-time employees plus eligible dependents.

Benefit summary:
 Vision Exam - $20.00 co-pay- every 12 months
 Prescription Glasses- $20.00 co-pay - every 12 months  Frames- $130 allowance for frame of choice/ 20% off amount over your allowance- every 12 months
 Contact Lenses – No co-pays applies – every 12 months ($130.00 allowance for contacts and the contact lens exam/fitting & evaluation)

Retirees may participate in the Vision Plan, provided the Plan will allow them to do so and the retiree pays the group rate plus the administrative fee that is allowed under COBRA laws (currently two (2) percent) to the City.

D. Other Insurance Benefits

56 The City will pay the monthly premiums for all full-time employees for life, long-term disability, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance. The insured valued benefit for each type of coverage is as follows:

1. Long-Term Disability - The City will provide Long Term Disability Premier (Plan B) through Police Officers Standards and Research (PORAC). The cost of said insurance plan shall be added to each employee’s salary. The employee will then pay the premium through payroll deduction.

2. Life - In the amount of $50,000.

3. Accidental Death and Dismemberment - In the amount of $50,000.

E. VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Program

VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Program allows employees to accumulate assests to pay for health insurance and out-of-pocket expenses in retirement.

Management agrees to open the contract to discuss the VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Program (and only this program), if the HPOA decides to participate in it.

ARTICLE XIV - LAY-OFF POLICY AND PROCEDURE

A. Discretion of City

Whenever it becomes necessary to abolish any position of employment, the employee holding such position of employment may be laid off or demoted without disciplinary action and without the right of appeal.

B. Notification

Employees to be laid off shall be given at least thirty (30)-calendar day’s prior notice.

C. Vacancy and Demotion

Except as otherwise provided, whenever there is a reduction in the work force, the appointing authority shall first demote to a vacancy, if any, in a lower class for which the employee who is the latest to be laid off in accordance with Section F below is qualified.

All persons so demoted shall have their names placed on the re-employment list.

D. Employee Rights

An employee affected by lay-off shall have the right to displace an employee who has less seniority in a lower class in the same class series or a lower classification in which the affected employee once had permanent status. For the purpose of this section and Section “E” below, seniority includes all periods of full-time service at or above the classification 57 level where lay-off is to occur.

E. Seniority

In order to retreat to a former or lower class, an employee must have more seniority than at least one of the incumbents in the retreat class and request displacement action in writing to the City Manager within five (5) working days of receipt of notice of lay-off.

Employees retreating to a lower or similar class shall be placed at the salary step representing the least loss of pay. In no case shall the salary be increased above that received in the class from which the employee was laid off.

Employees retreating to a lower or similar class shall serve a probationary period in a new class unless they have previously successfully completed a probationary period in the class or a class in the class series.

Whenever two (2) or more employees have the same hire date, the order of seniority shall be determined by lottery. The names of all employees having the same sworn date will be drawn at random, one (1) name at a time until all names are drawn. The order of selection shall determine the order of seniority, with the employee whose name is drawn first having the greater seniority. Lottery selection will be made by the Chief or his or her representative in the presence of an Association representative.

F. Employment Status

Employees shall be laid off in inverse order of seniority according to their date of hire as a full time sworn employee of the City of Hercules. Employees holding the rank of Sergeant shall be laid off in inverse order according to their date of promotion.

G. Re-employment List

The names of persons laid off or demoted in accordance with these rules shall be entered upon a re-employment list. Such list shall be used by the appointing authority when a vacancy arises in the same or lower class of position before certification is made from an eligible list.

H. Duration of Re-employment List

Names of persons laid off shall be carried on a re-employment list for one (1) year, except the persons appointed to permanent positions on the same level as that which laid off, shall, upon such appointment, be dropped from the list. Persons who refuse re-employment shall be dropped from the list. Persons re-employed in a lower class, or on a temporary basis, shall be continued on the list for the higher position for one (1) year.

ARTICLE XV - OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT AND OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES

58 A. General Prohibition

No employee shall engage in employment, activities, or enterprises for compensation of any kind or character which is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to his or her duties as an employee of the City or the duties, functions, or responsibilities of his or her position or the City itself.

B. Definition

For the purpose of this section, an employment activity or enterprise is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to those various duties, functions, or responsibilities set forth above if it:

a. Involves the use for private gain or advantage of the City’s time, facilities, equipment, or supplies; or except in limited cases of police officers, the badge, uniform, prestige, or influence of the City; or

b. Involves receipt or acceptance by a City employee of any money or other consideration from anyone other than the City for performing an act which the employee would be required or expected to perform in the regular course of working as a City employee; or

c. Involves the performance of an act in an outside capacity which may be subject directly or indirectly to the control, approval, inspection, review, audit, or enforcement of an officer, employee, or elected official of the City; or

d. Involves such time demands as would render performance of duties as a City employee less efficient, in the opinion of the Chief of Police and concurrence of the City Manager; or

e. Gives the appearance of involving or potentially involving the influence, directly or indirectly, or knowledge acquired by virtue of one’s City office or employment; or Involves an employment activity or enterprise which is inconsistent with the nature of the employment or professional standards called for by the employee’s position.

C. Chief of Police’s Approval

No employee shall be gainfully employed at any employment activity or enterprise outside of the City service without the prior approval from the Chief of Police. Such approval shall be denied only if the employment violates Section B of this Article.

D. Retroactive and Prospective Application

All provisions of this section shall apply to outside employment held by an employee on the effective date of this Agreement, as well as any outside employment sought after the 59 date of this Agreement. As to any outside employment held on the effective date of this Agreement which is not approved, the City Manager may allow a reasonable period, not to exceed one year, for the employee to cease such outside employment.

E. Grievance Authority

An employee dissatisfied with a decision of the Chief of Police under this section may request a review before the City Manager in a manner provided in Article XVII of this Agreement. The City Manager’s decision is final.

F. Penalty for Violation of this Section

An employee’s failure to abide by this section may be cause for disciplinary action and/or disciplinary action and/or dismissal.

ARTICLE XVI - DISCIPLINARY ACTION PROCEDURES

A. Applicability of This Section

1. The provisions of this article shall be administered in compliance with the requirements of State law governing police officer discipline set forth under Section 3303 of the California Government Code.

B. Grounds for Discipline

Causes for disciplinary action include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Fraud in securing appointment;

2. In competency, inefficiency, inexcusable neglect of duties, or failure to perform duties;

3. Insubordination;

4. Dishonesty;

5. Drunkenness on duty or chronic abuse of alcohol;

6. Addiction to or use of narcotics or habit-forming drugs;

7. Violation of City or departmental rules;

8. Misuse or appropriation of City property or funds;
60 9. Negligence or misconduct resulting in damage to public property or waste of public supplies;

10. Failure to follow adopted safety practices, or failure to properly use required personal protective gear or equipment;

11. Discourteous or non-cooperative treatment of the public or other City personnel;

12. Acceptance of gifts or gratuities for the performance of services, functions, or duties for which employee is retained by the City;

13. Conviction of a crime;

14. Engaging in any employment, activity, or enterprise which is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to performance of services, functions, and duties for which the employee is retained by the City;

15. Failure to maintain required licenses and certificates;

16. Failure to maintain eligibility for vehicle insurance coverage where driving is a requirement of the job classification. For purposes of this section, “driving is a requirement of the job classification” when the job description for the classification lists a driver’s license as one of the requirements for the position.

C. Delegation of Disciplinary Action

The City Manager may impose discipline or authorize any Department Head to discipline subordinate employees subject to these procedures.

D. Types of Discipline

The specific disciplinary actions which may be imposed against City employees are defined below. The City may also issue non-disciplinary letters of instruction. A letter of instruction shall be removed from the employee’s personnel file on completion of the annual evaluation subsequent to its issuance.

1. Written Reprimand

A written reprimand is a formal notice to an employee that his or her performance or behavior must be improved and that further disciplinary action, including additional reprimands, suspension, reduction in pay, demotion, or dismissal, may be taken unless the employee’s performance or behavior is improved.

a. The content of the written reprimand should include the following:

61 - A description of the action or activity necessitating a written reprimand; - The date(s) and time(s) of the action or activity causing the written reprimand.

b. The written reprimand should be prepared in duplicate and presented to the employee for his or her signature.

c. The written reprimand should then be distributed as follows:

- One copy to the employee;
- Copies to the Department Head and City Manager;
- One copy to the employee’s personnel file.

d. Employees shall have sixty (60) calendar days within which to respond to any adverse comments entered in his or her personnel file. Such responses shall be attached to the adverse comments.

e. There shall be no right to appeal a written reprimand beyond Level III review by the City Manager as provided above in this agreement.

f. After one (1) year, an employee may request that the Chief of Police remove a written reprimand from the employee’s record.

2. Suspension

a. Suspension is the temporary removal, without pay, of an employee from his or her duties.

b. The Chief of Police may suspend an employee for up to three (3) working days for each violation.

c. Suspensions of more than three (3) days are imposed by the City Manager.

There shall be no right to appeal suspensions of three (3) days or less beyond a Level III review by the City Manager as described in Article XVII of this Agreement.

3. Demotion

a. A demotion is the removal of an employee from his or her existing position to a lower paying position.

b. All demotions shall follow the guidelines of the Disciplinary Procedures in Section E below.

c. The rejection of an employee who is serving in a probationary promotional position and subsequent removal is a failure by the employee to satisfactorily 62 complete the promotional testing process. Such an employee would be returned to his or her prior position. Such a rejection and removal is not disciplinary action subject to this Agreement.

4. Reduction in Pay

a. A reduction in pay within an employee’s salary range represents a permanent or temporary lowering of an employee’s salary rate, with a corresponding reduction in all other salary-based fringe benefits.

b. Reduction in pay resulting from the rejection of an employee who is serving in a probationary promotional position and is rejected during that period is not a disciplinary action subject to these procedures.

5. Discharge

a. Discharge is the permanent removal of an employee from the City’s service.

b. Job abandonment as defined in the City’s Rules and Regulations is neither a “discharge” nor disciplinary action, but is construed as the voluntary resignation of the employee.

E. Disciplinary Appeal Process

1. Upon the suspension without pay, demotion, reduction in pay, or discharge of an employee who is an Association member, the procedures described in Section 3 below shall be followed.

2. These procedures shall also constitute the administrative appeal rights and 63 protections afforded by the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Government Code Sections 3300 et seq.)

3. These disciplinary appeal procedures include notice and four Levels (I, II, III, IV) of Response.

a. Preliminary Notice of Possible Disciplinary Action

No employee for whom this section applies shall be subject to disciplinary action unless prior to the action the employee has received:

i. Notice of possible disciplinary action, including the specific nature of such discipline;

ii. A written copy of the charges and the grounds for such charges;

iii. Copies of all relevant materials upon which the charges are based; and

iv. Notice of a reasonable time which shall not be less than seven (7) calendar days within which to respond orally and/or in writing to the charges or schedule a meeting at which to respond orally to the charges.

b. Notice of Disciplinary Action Taken

1. No disciplinary action shall be taken against an employee until the time period provided herein has passed for a response from the employee to the notice of possible disciplinary action and no response was received, or after the employee has responded to the preliminary notice of disciplinary action.

2. Thereafter, the employee shall be given written notice of the discipline to be imposed, if any, including the charges and the grounds for such charges, as well as notice of the employee’s appeal rights under these provisions.
c. Appeals

1. A “disciplinary appeal” is a formal written objection or challenge to any disciplinary action, including dismissal, demotion, suspension, or reduction in salary. The reduction in pay or change in assignment which occurs in the course of regular rotation is not punitive and shall not be subject to this grievance procedure.
64 2. Appeal of Written Reprimand or Suspension of Three (3) Days or Less

A written reprimand or suspension of three (3) days or less may be appealed in writing to the City Manager within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of the notice of disciplinary action.

The City Manager, within a reasonable time, shall conduct a hearing and render a written decision which shall be final

3. Appeal of Suspension of More Than Three (3) Days, Demotion, Reduction in Pay, or Discharge

An employee shall have the right to an appeal of a disciplinary action involving a suspension of more than three (3) days, a demotion, a reduction in pay and/or discharge. The procedures described in Sections 1 through 5 below shall be followed for all appeals.

1. Notice

(1) Within fifteen (15) calendar days of receiving a written notice of disciplinary action, the employee may submit
a written request to the City Manager for a hearing before a hearing officer from the California Office of Mediation and Conciliation.

(2) The parties shall request that State Mediation and
Conciliation supply a list of seven (7) names of
persons experienced in hearing public employment
discipline matters. If the City and the Association are unable to mutually agree on a hearing officer, each party shall alternately strike a name from the list until only one remains. The order of strike shall be determined by lot.

(3) The hearing shall be scheduled within sixty (60) days of such a request unless both parties agree to waive this
provision.

(4) Written notice of the hearing shall be given to the employee and his/her representative, if any, promptly
upon the scheduling of the hearing, but in no event shall the hearing be scheduled with less than twenty (20) days notice. For good cause, the Hearing Officer may grant a continuance.
65 (5) This notice shall be mailed by ordinary mail and also by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the
employee’s last address of record on file in the Personnel Office. The employee bears the burden of keeping a
current address on file.

2. Appearance; Representation; Witnesses; Conduct of Hearing

(1) At the administrative hearing, the employee and the City Manager shall each be entitled to representation.

(2) An official record shall be made of the hearing by a certified court reporter. The cost of a transcript shall be borne by the party requesting a transcript. Such
transcript shall be the official record of the proceeding; however, either party may tape record the proceedings.

(3) The hearing may be public or closed, at the employee’s option. Both the employee and City may designate a
person who shall not be subject to exclusion as a witness and who has investigated the matter at issue in the
hearing and whose assistance during the hearing is
necessary to the efficient conduct of the hearing.

Witnesses shall be subject to cross examination.

(4) The hearing shall proceed generally as follows:

(1) The City and the employee or his or her
representative may make opening statements.

(2) The City shall present evidence in support of the
City’s position. The employee may present
evidence on his or her behalf.

(3) Both the City and the employee may subpoena
witnesses and present rebuttal evidence as they
deem necessary and appropriate.

(4) The Hearing Officer shall rule on any objections made to the admissibility of evidence or
otherwise relating to the conduct of the hearing.

Such rulings shall be final. Hearsay evidence
shall be admissible but shall not form the sole
basis for a finding.
66 (5) The City and the employee may make closing
statements.

(6) Written briefs shall be submitted at the request
of either party.

3. Hearing Officer’s Decision

(1) Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall cause proposed findings and recommendations to
be prepared in writing and shall certify the same.

(2) The Hearing Officer shall, at a minimum, find whether the City has shown that the charges in support of the
disciplinary action have been substantiated. Such a
finding shall be made as to each charge. If the Hearing Officer finds that none of the charges are supported by the evidence presented, the recommendation shall be
that no disciplinary action be taken. If the Hearing
Officer finds that any or all the charges are supported, he/she shall either:

Recommendations shall be filed as a permanent record
with the City Manager. The City Manager shall deliver
a certified copy of such findings and recommendations
to the City Council and to the employee affected by such findings and recommendations.

(4) If, due to any cause, a hearing cannot be held and an employee is consequently denied such a hearing within
the time stated herein, action shall be deferred until a hearing can be scheduled.
(1) Recommend that the proposed disciplinary
action be carried out;
(2) Recommend that no disciplinary action be
taken; or
(3) Recommend that the proposed disciplinary
action be modified.
(3) The Hearing Officer’s findings and

67 (5) The cost of the Hearing Officer shall be borne by the City. All other costs shall be the responsibility of the party incurring them.

4. City Council Action

(1) The City Council shall have the following options with respect to the Hearing Officer’s findings and
recommendations:

* Adopt the findings and recommendations as
prepared;

* Modify the findings and recommendations; or

* Reject the Hearing Officer’s findings and
recommendations and adopt separate Council
findings and recommendations.

(2) If the findings and recommendations of the Hearing
Officer are adopted as proposed, the members of the City Council need not review the record of the hearing
before the Hearing Officer. Otherwise, the
Council shall review such record.

(3) The employee will be notified pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 that he or she
has ninety (90) calendar days within which to file an
appeal in Superior Court of the Council’s decision.

ARTICLE XVII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

A. Definitions

a. A “grievance” is an allegation by an employee or group of employees who claim to have been adversely affected by an alleged violation, misinterpretation, or misapplication of a specific provision of this Agreement, the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations or Police Department Policies.

b. A “grievant” is an employee adversely affected by an alleged violation, misinterpretation, or misapplication of a specific provision of this Agreement, or the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations or the Association specifically naming one or more such individuals.

B. General Provisions
68 1. Until final disposition of a grievance, the grievant shall comply with the directions of the grievant’s immediate supervisor.

2. All documents dealing with the processing of a grievance shall be filed separately from the personnel files of the employee.

3. Time limits for appeal provided at any level of this procedure shall begin the first day following receipt by the grievant of the written decision.

4. If any grievance meeting or hearing is scheduled during duty hours, any employee required by either party to participate as a witness or grievant in such meeting or hearing shall be released for a reasonable period of time from regular duties without loss of pay.

5. An employee may at any time present grievances to the City and have such grievances adjusted without the intervention of the Association, as long as the adjustment is not inconsistent with the terms of an applicable Memorandum of Understanding. The City shall not agree to a resolution of the grievance until the affected Association has received a copy of the grievance and the proposed resolution and has been given the opportunity to file a response. Upon request of the grievant, the grievant may be represented at any stage of the grievance procedure by a representative of the Association.

6. Time limits may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties.

C. Procedures

1. Level I - Information/Resolution

a. An employee who believes he or she has a grievance shall present the grievance orally to the immediate supervisor within fifteen (15) calendar days after the grievant knew, or reasonably should have known, of the circumstances which form the basis for the grievance.

b. Failure to do so will render the grievance null and void.

c. The immediate supervisor shall hold discussions and attempt to resolve the matter within fifteen (15) calendar days after the presentation of the grievance.

d. It is the intent of this informal meeting procedure that at least one personal conference be held between the aggrieved employee and the immediate supervisor.

2. Level II - Formal Written Grievance

a. If the grievance is not settled during the informal conference and the 69 grievant wishes to press the matter, the grievant shall present the grievance in writing to the Commander within fifteen (15) calendar days after the oral decision by the immediate supervisor.
b. The written information shall include:

1. A description of the specific grounds of the grievance, including names, dates, and places necessary for a complete understanding of the grievance;

2. The provisions of this Agreement or the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations which are alleged to have been violated;

3. The reasons why the immediate supervisor’s proposed resolution of the problem is unacceptable;

4. The specific actions requested of the City which will remedy the grievance.

c. The Commander shall communicate the decision to the grievant in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving the grievance. If the Commander does not respond within the time limits, the grievant may appeal to the next level.

d. Within the above time limits, either party may request a personal conference.

3. Level III - Appeal to the Chief of Police

a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level II, the grievant may within fifteen (15) calendar days of the receipt of the decision at Level II appeal the decision to the Chief of Police. The grievant shall present the grievance in writing to the Chief of Police within fifteen (15) calendar days after the decision by the Commander.

b. The written information shall include:

1. a description of the specific grounds of the grievance, including names, dates, and places necessary for a complete understanding of the grievance;

2. the provisions of this Agreement or the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations which are alleged to have been violated; 70 3. the reasons why the Commander’s proposed resolution of the problem is unacceptable;

4. the specific actions requested of the City which will remedy the grievance. c. The Chief of Police shall communicate the decision to the grievant in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving the grievance. If the Chief of Police does not respond within the time limits, the grievant may appeal to the next level.
d. Within the above time limits, either party may request a personal conference.

4. Level IV - Advisory Mediation
a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level III, either party by mutual agreement, may request the assistance of a mediator from the Mediation and Conciliation Service of the State of California.
b. The grievant must make his/her written request to submit the grievance to advisory mediation within fifteen (15) calendar days of the receipt of the decision at Level III. c. The City and the Association shall mutually agree upon a mediator from the Mediation and Conciliation Service of the State of California.

Those present at mediation shall include the Assistant City Manager, or the person the City Manager designates, the Chief of Police, the grievant, and his/her representative . d. The proceedings shall be tape recorded, including the opinion of the State mediator. The taped recording shall be sealed, signed, and dated by both parties. A written transcription shall be provided to both parties, if requested.
e. The mediator shall have no authority to resolve the grievance. In the event the grievance is not resolved, neither stipulations, admission, settlement proposals nor concessions agreed to or offered during the mediation shall be admissible at any subsequent hearing.

5. Level V - Appeal to the City Manager
a. If advisory mediation fails, the grievant may within fifteen (15) calendar days file a written appeal to the City Manager.
b. The statement of appeal shall include a copy of the original grievance and a clear, co n cis e statement of the reasons for the appeal to Level V. c. Within the fifteen (15) calendar days, the City Manager shall complete fact- finding which may include review of the mediation transcript, 71 scheduling a meeting with the grievant, Chief of Police, and their representatives, if any.
d. The City Manager shall communicate his or her decision to the grievant within fifteen (15) calendar days of the completion of fact-finding. e. The decision of the City Manager shall be final in resolving all employee grievances.

ARTICLE XVIII - WAIVER CLAUSE

Except as otherwise provided herein, no changes or modifications of this Agreement shall be offered, urged, or otherwise presented by the Association or the City during the term of this Agreement, provided, however, that nothing herein shall prevent the parties to this Agreement from meeting and conferring and making modifications herein by mutual consent. Any additions or changes in this Agreement shall not be effective unless reduced to writing and properly executed by both parties.

ARTICLE XIX - SEVERABILITY

If any provision of the Agreement, or the application of such provision to any persons or circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

ARTICLE XX - DURATION

This Agreement shall be effective July 1, 2024, and shall continue in full force and effect until June 30, 2025, and become amendable thereafter. The City and the Association shall meet prior to June 30, 2025 and confer on a successor M.O.U.

ARTICLE XXI - PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS

The Personnel Rules and Regulations which shall hereafter be adopted by the City shall control and determine any matters or subjects not specifically provided for herein. The Association shall have the opportunity to meet and consult with management on said Personnel Rules and Regulations prior to their adoption by the City Council. 72 FOR THE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION:

Chris Costa Date
HPOA President

Jonathan Fernandez Date
HPOA Negotiator

_________________________________ ________________________ Kyle Johnson Date
HPOA Negotiator

FOR THE CITY:

Dante Hall Date
City Manager
73 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR
POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION

OF THE CITY OF HERCULES

Effective July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025
Per Resolution No. 24-xxx

July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025
74 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERCULES AND

THE HERCULES POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

ARTICLE I - RECOGNITION ........................................................................................................ 1 ARTICLE II - NONDISCRIMINATION ....................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE III - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITY ..................................... 1 A. Management Rights ................................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE IV - SUPPORT OF AGREEMENT .............................................................................. 2 ARTICLE V - LEAVES ..................................................................................................................... 3 A. Sick Leave ......................................................................................................................... 3 B. Authorized Leaves of Absence Without Pay ........................................................... 3 C. Unauthorized Leaves of Absence ............................................................................ 5 D. Jury Duty ................................................................................................................. 5 E. Military Leave .............................................................................................................. 5 F. Pregnancy Disability Leave ..................................................................................... 5 G. Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 ......................................................................... 6 H. Catastrophic Illness and Donations of Leave by Employees...................................... 6 I. Bereavement Leave ...................................................................................................... 6 ARTICLE VI - HOURS OF WORK ........................................................................................... 6 A. Work Assignment ........................................................................................................ 6

1. Hours of Work ............................................................................................ 6

2. Break Periods ................................................................................................... 7 B. Overtime .................................................................................................................. 7 C. Compensatory Time Off .......................................................................................... 7 D. On Call Pay ............................................................................................................. 7 E. Call Back Pay ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 8 F. Court Pay................................................................................................................. 8 G. Department Training .................................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE VII - VACATION PLAN ............................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE VIII - HOLIDAYS......................................................................................................... 10 A. Holidays ...................................................................................................................... 10 ARTICLE IX - GENERAL PROVISIONS ................................................................................... 11 A. Payroll Deductions ..................................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE X - COMPENSATION ................................................................................................. 11 i
75 A. Salaries ........................................................................................................................ 11 B. Salary Upon Hire ................................................................................................... 12 C. Salary Step Advancement .......................................................................................... 12 D. Incentive Pay Plan ................................................................................................. 12 E. Education Reimbursement ......................................................................................... 13 F. Education Incentive Pay ........................................................................................ 14 G. Bilingual Pay ......................................................................................................... 14 H. Field Training Officer Pay Differential ................................................................. 14 I. Shift Differential…………………………………………………………………14 J. Assigned Positions……………………………………………………………….14 K.

Out-of-Class Work ............................................................................................................ 15

1. Officer in Charge ........................................................................................... 15

2. Acting Commander ................................................................................... 15

3. Acting Chief of Police ............................................................................... 15 L. Uniforms ..................................................................................................................... 15

1. New Employees ............................................................................................. 15

2. Uniform Allowance ....................................................................................... 16 M. Work-Out Pay ....................................................................................................... 16 N. K-9 Differential .......................................................................................................... 16 O. Longevity Pay ....................................................................................................... 16 P. Assigned Take-Home Department Vehicles ............................................................. 17 Q. Assigned Position - Corporal ..................................................................................... 17 R. Computer Loan Program ........................................................................................... 17 ARTICLE XI - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN ............................................................ 17 ARTICLE XII - EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN ............................................................ 17 ARTICLE XIII - MEDICAL AND INSURANCE BENEFITS .................................................. 18 A. Medical.................................................................................................................. 18

1. Medical Redirect ............................................................................................ 21

2. Vision/Dental ................................................................................................. 21 B. Dental and Orthodontic .............................................................................................. 21 C. Vision .......................................................................................................................... 21 D. Other Insurance Benefits ........................................................................................... 22

1. Long-Term Disability ................................................................................ 22

2. Life ................................................................................................................. 22

3. Accidental Death and Dismemberment ........................................................ 22 E. Vantage Care Retiree Health Savings Program ........................................................ 22 ARTICLE XIV - LAY-OFF POLICY AND PROCEDURE ..................................................... 22 A. Discretion of City .................................................................................................. 22 B. Notification ................................................................................................................. 22 C. Vacancy and Demotion ......................................................................................... 22 D. Employee Rights ................................................................................................... 23 E. Seniority ................................................................................................................ 23 F. Employment Status .................................................................................................... 23 76 G. Re-employment List ....................................................................................................... 23 H. Duration of Re-employment List .................................................................................. 24 ARTICLE XV - OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT AND OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES ....................... 24 A. General Prohibition .................................................................................................... 24 B. Definition .............................................................................................................. 24 C. Chief of Police’s Approval ........................................................................................ 25 D. Retroactive and Prospective Application ............................................................... 25 E. Grievance Authority .............................................................................................. 25 F. Penalty for Violation of this Section ..................................................................... 25 ARTICLE XVI - DISCIPLINARY ACTION PROCEDURES .................................................. 25 A. Applicability of This Section ................................................................................. 25 B. Grounds for Discipline ............................................................................................... 25 C. Delegation of Disciplinary Action ......................................................................... 26 D. Types of Discipline ............................................................................................... 26

1. Written Reprimand ........................................................................................ 27

2. Suspension ..................................................................................................... 27

3. Demotion ................................................................................................... 28

4. Reduction in Pay ....................................................................................... 28

5. Discharge ....................................................................................................... 28 E. Disciplinary Appeal Process ...................................................................................... 28 ARTICLE XVII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ......................................................................... 33 A. Definitions .................................................................................................................. 33 B. General Provisions ..................................................................................................... 33 C. Procedures .................................................................................................................. 34

1. Level I - Information/Resolution .................................................................. 34

2. Level II - Formal Written Grievance ......................................................... 34

3. Level III - Appeal to the Chief of Police ................................................... 35

4. Level IV - Advisory Mediation ................................................................. 35

5. Level V - Appeal to the City Manager ...................................................... 36 ARTICLE XVIII - WAIVER CLAUSE ........................................................................................ 37 ARTICLE XIX - SEVERABILITY ................................................................................................ 37 ARTICLE XX - DURATION .......................................................................................................... 37 ARTICLE XXI - PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS ............................................. 37 SIGNATURE PAGE ......................................................................................................................... 38 77 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERCULES AND

THE HERCULES POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION

This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into pursuant to the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Government Code section 3500 et seq). Parties to this Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU” herein) are the City of Hercules (“City” herein) and the Hercules Police Officers Association (“Association” herein). The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment of the employees represented by the Association and have exchanged freely information, opinions and proposals and have endeavored to reach an agreement on matters relating to the employment, conditions, and employee relations of such employees.

This Memorandum of Understanding shall be presented to the City Council as a joint recommendation of the undersigned for salary, fringe benefits, and other working conditions for the period of July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025, and shall be in full force and effect at such date as herein prescribed, on ratification by both the City Council and affected members of the Police Association.

ARTICLE I - RECOGNITION

The City recognizes the Association as the exclusive representative of the full-time sworn employees of the Hercules Police Department in the classifications of Sergeant and Police Officer.

Said recognition herein shall remain in full force and effect unless decertified according to procedures adopted in conformity with State law. The provisions of this article shall not preclude any individual representing him/herself in matters of employer/employee relations.

ARTICLE II - NONDISCRIMINATION

No bargaining unit members represented by the Association shall be reduced or removed, or in any way favored or discriminated against because of race, sex, national origin, or religion.

Neither the City nor the Association shall interfere with, intimidate, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against bargaining unit members because of the exercise of their rights to engage or not to engage in employee organization activities pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 et seq.

ARTICLE III - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITY

1. Management Rights

- The City retains all its exclusive rights and authority under State law and expressly and exclusively retains its management rights, which include, but are not limited to:

- The exclusive right to determine the mission and organization of its constituent departments and commissions;
78 - Set standards and levels of service;

- Determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment and promotions;

- Establish and effect administrative regulations consistent with laws and the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding to direct its employees;

- Maintain the efficiency of governmental operations;

- Determine the methods, means, and numbers and kinds of personnel by which governmental operations are to be conducted;

- Determine methods of financing;

- Determine and/or change the facilities, methods, technology, means, organizational structures, and size and composition of the work force and allocate and assign work by which the City operations are to be conducted;

- Determine and change the numbers of locations, relocations, and types of operations, processes and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions;

- Discharge, suspend, demote, reprimand, withhold salary increases and benefits, or otherwise discipline employees in accordance with applicable law;

- Take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies;

- Exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work; and

- Take actions as are in the interest of effective service to the community.

The City maintains the right to use qualified volunteers or reserves in the Police Department. Use of said individuals shall be in accordance with State law and Police Department regulations.

ARTICLE IV - SUPPORT OF AGREEMENT

During the term of this agreement, the City agrees not to negotiate with any organization other than the Police Officers Association or its designated representatives on matters on which the Association is the exclusive representative and which is within its scope of representation. The Association agrees to negotiate only with the representatives officially designated by the City to act on its behalf.

The Association is given a bank of 120 hours for Association business during the term of this MOU.
79 ARTICLE V - LEAVES

A. Sick Leave

1. The City provides paid sick leave benefits for all full-time sworn employees. Sick leave accrues at the rate of eight (8) hours per month for each month in which an employee has worked a minimum of 96 hours. The maximum accrual of sick leave is 2,080 hours. The City does not pay employees for unused sick leave upon termination for any reason.

Sick leave may be taken by an employee only under the following circumstances:

- When sickness prevents performance of services, functions, or duties;

- In the event of a serious illness to a member of the employee’s immediate family (defined as the employee’s spouse, parent, step-parent, brother, sister, child, step child, domestic partner, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sister-in-law, brother-in-law, grandparent, grandchild or legal guardian); or for a scheduled medical or dental appointment for the employee or the employee’s dependent children, in the event that the appointment requires the employee to be absent from work.

In requesting sick leave, members must notify, or make reasonable effort to notify, the watch commander four (4) hours prior to the member’s work shift. The City may require an employee to submit a doctor’s excuse for sick leave under the following circumstances:

- More than two (2) consecutive sick leave days taken by the employee.

- With prior notification of the employee.

In cases where an employee’s request for sick leave would normally be approved, but there is no sick leave accrual available, then the absence shall be charged against the available vacation or compensatory time balance. If there is no such vacation or compensatory time available, then the time off shall be recorded as an authorized unpaid Leave of Absence. An employee claiming for long-term disability benefits shall not be required to first exhaust paid leave.

If an employee’s death is duty-related, his beneficiary shall be entitled to reimbursement for all that officer’s accumulated unused sick leave.

B. Authorized Leaves of Absence Without Pay

1. Requesting Leave

Upon the recommendation of the Chief of Police, the City Manager may, in his or 80 her discretion, grant an employee an unpaid Leave of Absence not to exceed three (3) months. Employees desiring to take time off without pay who have no leave balances available shall submit a request in writing to the Chief of Police. Whenever possible, such request shall be submitted at least five (5) weeks in advance .

2. Extension of Leaves

During the period of the Leave of Absence, an employee may request that the leave be extended by submitting such a request in writing to the City Manager stating the reason for the extension. Such a request may be approved or disapproved by the City Manager as described in the above section. No Leaves of Absence exceeding one (1) year may be granted under any circumstances.

3. Early Return From Leaves of Absence

An employee may request permission from the City Manager to return to work prior to the approved expiration of the leave. Approval of the City Manager for such early returns is discretionary.

4. Failure to Return to Work From Leave of Absence

Failure of an employee to return to work on the approved date is grounds for disciplinary action up to and including dismissal.

5. Benefits During Leaves of Absence

Employees on leave of absence may continue their medical and insurance benefit coverage by reimbursing the City directly for the amount of the insurance premiums in advance. Such reimbursement must be made in advance by the 30th day of the preceding month for the subsequent month for each month in which the employee wishes to receive coverage. Should the employee fail to submit payment on a timely basis, the Personnel Department will send the employee a reminder notice. Coverage in any plan will be dropped if the employee is more than 30 days late in making a premium payment.

6. Status of Employee on Authorized Leave of Absence

a. An authorized Leave of Absence does not represent a break in employment for a full time sworn employee. Such an employee retains all accrued vacation, sick leave, and other rights as exist at the time the Leave of Absence begins.

However, only active full-time service shall count towards accumulated seniority or toward benefits, which accrue according to length of service (including vacation and sick leave). Vacation, sick leave, holiday, and merit salary increases do not accrue to an employee on leave during the period of such leave.
81 b. An employee returning from Leave of Absence shall return to the same salary step or relative placement in the pay range existing at the time the employee returns to work.

C. Unauthorized Leaves of Absence

Any unauthorized Leave of Absence may be cause for disciplinary action.

D. Jury Duty

The City provides jury duty leave with pay for all sworn employees who are called upon to serve for court jury duty according to the following provisions:

1. An employee called for jury duty should immediately notify the Chief of Police by providing the jury summons indicating the date, time, and place.

2. An employee may either remain in regular pay status and turn over to the City all jury duty wages (less mileage allowance if provided by the Court), or may take vacation leave, compensatory time off, or authorized Leave of Absence without pay and retain all jury duty wages.

E. Military Leave

Military Leave of Absence shall be granted within the provisions of State law.

F. Pregnancy Disability Leave

1. Employees are entitled to use sick leave, accrued vacation and/or compensatory time off for disabilities caused or contributed to by pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth, and recovery therefrom on the same terms and conditions governing Leaves of Absence for other temporary illness or medical disability.

2. Such leave shall not be used for childcare, child rearing, or preparation for childbearing, but shall be limited to those disabilities as set forth above.

3. The length of such disability leave, including the date on which the leave shall commence and the date on which the duties are to be resumed, shall be determined by the employee and the employee’s physician; however, the Personnel Department may require a verification of the extent of disability through a physical examination of the employee by a physician appointed by the City at City expense.

4. Employees are entitled to leave without pay or other benefits for disabilities because of pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth, or recovery therefrom when sick leave has been exhausted on the same terms and conditions applicable to other temporary illness or medical disability.
82 5. The employee on pregnancy disability leave shall be returned to an equivalent position within her classification.

G. Family Medical Leave Act of 1993

1. The City shall provide eligible employees with family care leave in accordance with the Federal Family Medical and Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA). Under FMLA and the CFRA, eligible employees may take up to twelve (12) weeks of unpaid leave; however, employees must first use accrued vacation and compensatory time leave.

H. Catastrophic Illness and Donations of Leave by Employees

1. HPOA members may participate in the City of Hercules Catastrophic Illness Plan as donors and receivers of hours.

I. Bereavement Leave

Paid bereavement leave of up to 40 hours shall be provided to employees in the event of a death in the immediate family of the employee. In addition to the 40 hours of paid bereavement leave, employees may use accrued unused vacation or sick leave to extend their bereavement leave up to a total of 56 hours. At the discretion of the City Manager, additional time may be taken as vacation, sick leave or unpaid leave.

Immediate family of an employee is defined as: parents, step-parents, parent-in-laws, spouse, domestic partner, child, step child, brother, sister, grandparents, grandchildren, brother/sister in-law, son/daughter-in-law or legal guardian.

In special cases, the City Manager may approve a leave of absence for bereavement in other circumstances.

ARTICLE VI - HOURS OF WORK

A. Work Assignment

Full-time employees shall be assigned to a shift designated by the Chief of Police after a meet and confer with the HPOA on the number of days and hours equaling eighty (80) hours per two week period at such times as designated by the Chief of Police.

1. Hours of Work

a. Effective January 1, 1996, the City designated a 7(k) exemption under FLSA of one hundred and seventy-one (171) hours per 28-day period as the standard work period.
83 2. Break Periods

Employees shall receive one (1) fifteen-minute break during the mid-portion of each four-hour block of time. In addition, employees shall receive allowance of forty-five minutes for meals during each shift of duty. If an employee does not receive at least thirty minutes for meal break during a shift, he/she shall be paid compensation for forty-five minutes at a time and one-half (1-1/2) rate.

B. Overtime

1. All employees required to work in excess of their regularly assigned shift shall receive compensation at the rate of time and one-half (1-1/2) of the employee’s regular base rate of pay for each additional quarter hour of work performed.

2. An employee required to work in excess of 171 hours per 28-day period shall receive time and one-half (1-1/2) of the employee’s regular base rate plus, if assigned shift differential, Officer-In-Charge (OIC) pay, Field Training Officer pay, and education incentive pay.

3. Overtime shall be earned and recorded in quarters (1/4th) of an hour increments rounded to the nearest quarter (1/4th) of an hour.

C. Compensatory Time Off

In lieu of receiving cash payment at the regular rate of pay (Section B) for overtime hours worked, an employee may elect the option of taking compensatory time off (CTO).

Compensatory time off shall be earned at the rate of time and one-half for each hour worked. Compensatory time off must be requested by the employee when submitting an overtime slip. No more than two hundred forty (240) hours of compensatory time off may be accumulated. Compensatory time off must be scheduled with the advance approval of the Chief of Police or his/her designee. Use of accumulated compensatory time off shall follow the current guidelines provided by the United States Department of Labor.

D. On Call Pay

Detectives and other employees who are required to remain on call or on court telephone standby by the Chief of Police or his/her designee shall be restricted from traveling to any location which would preclude his/her return to duty within one-half hour and shall be required to maintain the ability to be contacted by phone at all times. Employees shall be compensated at the following rate:

$50.00 per weekday
$55.00 per weekend day
$60.00 per holiday

Detectives shall have full use of a take-home City vehicle while on call. 84 E. Call Back Pay

When an officer is called back to duty by a supervisor, that officer shall be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times his/her regular hourly rate. Any compensation for being called back to duty shall cease after the officer is relieved from duty by his/her supervisor.

Any employee represented by the Association who is called back in accordance with this article shall be compensated for a minimum of four (4) hours. The City and the Association agree that the intent of this Article is to compensate employees who are called back to duty on an emergency or urgent basis, or for department meetings, training, or City business, and that this Article shall not apply if “call back” work hours are contiguous either prior to or at the end of the employee’s normally assigned shift. If an employee receives, less than eight (8) hours notice to return to duty for hours that are contiguous and prior to the normally assigned shift, the minimum shall apply.

F. Court Pay

An employee shall be entitled to receive compensation for a court appearance as a witness subpoenaed by the City, the State of California, or the United States, as follows:

1. Court appearances made while on-duty shall constitute normal hours of work.

2. In the event a court appearance extends beyond the end of the officer’s regularly assigned shift, such time spent in court will be treated as normal work time for the purpose of computing the officer’s overtime compensation.

3. Employees required to appear in court during their off-duty time shall be paid as follows:

a. Morning Session Only: Employees shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation at the appropriate rate. Time in excess of the minimum compensation shall be on an actual time basis at time and one-half (1-1/2).

b. Afternoon Session Only: Employees shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation. Time in excess of the minimum compensation shall be on an actual time basis at time and one-half (1-1/2).

c. Morning and Afternoon Sessions: When an employee is required to be present at both a morning and an afternoon court or attorney conference, the employee shall receive overtime compensation for the actual time spent in court from the time of arrival until dismissed by the court including lunch recesses.

d. Afternoon and Evening Sessions: When an employee is required to be present at both an afternoon and an evening court or attorney conference, the employee shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation for the afternoon session. When the employee is released from court one (1) or 85 more hours prior to the start of the evening session, or the evening session is scheduled for a court in a different city than that of the afternoon session, the employee shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours compensation for the evening session.

e. In the event the time spent in court extends into the beginning of the employee’s regularly scheduled work shift, time spent in court shall be deemed ended at the time such shift is scheduled to begin for the purpose of computing the employee’s overtime compensation.

f. Compensation for court pay is subject to the employee submitting the appropriate form reflecting the beginning and ending time of the court appearance.

If a morning court appearance is canceled with six (6) hours or less notice provided to the employee or an afternoon appearance is canceled with two (2) hours or less notice provided to the employee, the employee shall be compensated for one (1) hour pay at the overtime rate.

G. Department Training

1. For the purpose of department scheduled training, work assignments shall not be modified with less than seven (7) calendar days notice or upon mutual agreement by the employee and the Chief of Police or designee.

2. Training Hours: Any training of six (6) hours or more shall be considered a full shift; less than six (6) hours, the employee shall be required to return to duty on that shift.

3. Any travel time that is outside the work assignment and in excess of the employee’s normal commute is subject to compensation by The City. The City will compensate employees for travel time to training through an established Travel Time Guide.

ARTICLE VII - VACATION PLAN

A. Accrual Rate and Accumulation

The City provides paid vacation benefits for all full-time employees. Vacation shall be paid at the regular rate of pay earned at the time of vacation is commenced. The amount of annual paid vacation accrual is based on the number of years of full-time service based on total time in public service for each member. Existing designated employees may qualify as being eligible for this provision on a forward going basis. The vacation accrual is as follows:

- Start to 4 years of service – 96 hours annually
- 5 to 9 years of service – 120 hours annually
86 - 10 to 15 years of service – 144 hours annually
- 16 to 19 years of service – 160 hours annually
- 20 years plus of service – 176 hours annually

The maximum vacation balance which may be accumulated is 280 hours. When an employee reaches this maximum balance, no additional earned vacation is added to his/her account. The maximum amount of vacation accrual which may be added to the vacation balance in any one (1) year is the amount earned during the year less forty (40) hours.

No vacation leave may be earned by an employee while he/she is on Leave of Absence. In addition, an employee may not take vacation during his/her first six (6) full months of employment.

When an employee is terminated for any reason, he/she shall be entitled to all vacation pay earned and accumulated up to and including the effective date of the termination.

B. Vacation Sell Back

Consistent with City policy, employees may sell back up to 40 hours of their accrued unused vacation annually, once during each fiscal year. Employees will only be allowed to cash-out a maximum of 40 hours of vacation, provided that after doing so it leaves them with at least 40 hours of vacation and/or compensatory time on the books and 40 hours of sick leave at the time of cash- out.

ARTICLE VIII - HOLIDAYS

A. Holidays

The City provides paid time off for all full-time permanent employees for thirteen (13) holidays per year. Payment for holidays shall be as follows:

- Employees not receiving extra days off for City holidays shall be compensated for holidays in the pay period in which the holiday falls. - Employees who are not assigned to a uniformed position shall continue to have the option of working the designated City Holiday schedule and thus receive the above holiday compensation. The decision to work the holiday schedule will be a yearly one and must be declared to the finance department prior to the start of the fiscal year. Those employees that choose not to work the City Holiday schedule and receive compensation in the form of time off shall not receive financial compensation for the days off as outlined in Article VIII on this MOU. - Employees separated from City service before June 1 or December 1 shall be entitled to receive holiday pay at the rate of one (1) holiday for each month that the employee was in paid status through the first pay period of the month, e.g., employees who separate on or after the 16th of March shall be entitled to three (3) 87 holidays at eight (8) hours straight time; employees who separate from City service before the 16th of March shall be entitled to two (2) holidays at straight time.

- Each POA member will be allocated floating holiday hours. The number of hours will be determined by the holiday schedule issued by the City Manager for the city offices. Each member may select these floating holidays, subject to the requirement that their supervisor must approve requests for time off that do not incur a cost to the city. Floating holidays are provided for annually on each fiscal year (July 1 – June 30) and cannot be carried forward each year.

- Proclaimed Holidays

 Independence Day
 Labor Day
 Veterans' Day
 Thanksgiving Day
 Day After Thanksgiving
 Christmas Eve Day
 Christmas Day
 New Year's Day
 Martin Luther King Day
 President's Day
 Memorial Day
 Two Floating Holidays

If any of these Holidays fall on a Sunday, the Monday following shall be observed as the holiday. If any of these Holidays fall on a Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the Holiday.

To be eligible for Holiday pay, employees must have worked the workday before and the workday after the Holiday, or be in approved paid leave status the workday before and the work day after the Holiday.

ARTICLE IX - GENERAL PROVISIONS

A. Payroll Deductions

The City shall grant payroll deductions for membership dues to the Association.

ARTICLE X - COMPENSATION

A. Salaries

88 The salaries in Table 1 below include a three percent (3%) base wage increase, effective the first full pay period after June 30, 2024.

TABLE 1

July 1, 2024 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
Police Officer $8,853.80 $9,119.43 $9,393.00 $9,674.81 $9,965.06 $10,264.01 Police Sergeant $10,466.36 $10,780.34 $11,103.77 $11,436.86 $11,779.94 $12,133.38

1. Effective the first full pay period following July 1, 2024, all bargaining unit members will be required to participate in the City’s Direct Deposit program for all regular paychecks.

All members of the bargaining unit shall receive a one-time, non-recurring, non-pensionable retention payment of five percent (5%) of their gross annual salary earned in FY 2023-24. The retention payment shall be paid in the second pay period following ratification by both parties of the successor agreement.

Members may elect to direct the retention payment to their Deferred Compensation Plan if desired.

B. Salary Upon Hire

A. Police Officer Trainees, while at the Police Academy and who have not graduated from the Police Academy, shall be compensated at a rate of ten percent (10%) less than Step 1 of the range for Police Officer.

C. Salary Step Advancement

It is the responsibility of the City to establish appropriate standards of performance for employees and to review employees’ performance in meeting established standards. Employees will be evaluated as to whether the employee meets standards, exceeds standards, or fails to meet standards. Employees evaluated as meeting or exceeding standards overall will receive a salary step advancement to the next salary step until the employee reaches the top step of the salary range. For employees hired on or after July 1, 1990, the salary step advancement shall become effective the first pay period following the employee’s anniversary date. Excepted from this provision shall be those employees whose anniversary date falls on the first day of the pay period. An employee evaluated as failing to meet standards overall will receive no salary step advancement and such an employee’s evaluation will indicate the specific areas of improvement needed in order to meet standards overall; such an evaluation may be appealed initially to the Chief of Police and then, if desired, to the City Manager 89 whose determination shall be final.

An employee evaluated as failing to meet standards overall will receive a follow-up evaluation not less than three (3) months nor more than six (6) months following the initial evaluation and will be granted a salary step advancement at that time if the employee’s performance is rated as meeting or exceeding standards overall.

Employees are eligible for further salary step advancement twelve (12) months following their previous salary step advancement, except as provided in B, 1, above. When an employee demonstrates an outstanding level of performance in the opinion of the Chief of Police, the employee may be evaluated and awarded salary step advancement, even though twelve (12) months have not elapsed since the employee’s previous salary step advancement.

The evaluation will be discussed with the employee and space will be provided on the evaluation form for the employee’s comments. The employee will be given a copy of the evaluation.

The HPOA salary schedule will consist of six steps, with each additional step above #1 receiving an additional 3% of salary.

D. Incentive Pay Plan

HPOA employees will be eligible for the same incentive plan that the rest of the City employees have. The City will meet and confer with HPOA on the formulation of this policy.

E. Education Reimbursement

An employee who is enrolled in a technical/vocational, an associate of arts, bachelor’s, or master’s degree program which the City determines is in a job-related field may receive reimbursement for tuition and books in an amount not to exceed three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) per fiscal year. The Chief of Police, the Human Resources Department and the City Manager must approve the reimbursement prior to enrollment.

Evidence of a grade of “C” or better – or, if no grade is given, successful completion of the course – shall be required as a condition of obtaining reimbursement. There will be a total of $30,000 dollar annual allocation in the Education Reimbursement Program for all City employee groups. A POA member who is enrolled in a degree program and has received reimbursement monies the prior year will have priority and cannot be bumped from the program by a member who did not receive a reimbursement the prior fiscal year.

F. Education Incentive Pay

Extra compensation for possession of POST certificates and/or college degrees shall be provided pursuant to the following schedule:
90 A. Intermediate POST Certificate: 3.5% of base wage; B. Associate of Arts Degree: 4% of base wage;
C. Advanced POST Certificate: 4.5% of base wage;
D. Bachelor of Arts Degree: 5% of base wage.

An employee shall only be eligible for one of the foregoing education incentive payments.

G. Bilingual Pay

Effective July 1, 2019, an employee certified as bilingual shall receive an additional premium of 1% of base wage per month if he or she is certified as bilingual as follows:

A. The employee has the demonstrated ability to translate Spanish, Chinese or Tagalog into English and vice versa, both in writing and verbally, established by passing a proficiency test administered by the City’s Human Resources representative or its designee; and,

B. The employee and department head certify that the employee’s bilingual skills are desired by the department, and the employee may be called upon when necessary to translate communications as required by the department head.

H. Field Training Officer Pay Differential
An employee who is assigned as a Field Training Officer will be paid an additional five percent (5%) of his/her salary for actual time spent as a Field Training Officer. This differential shall also apply to the Field Training Sergeant.

I. Shift Differential
The City agrees to pay a differential of three percent (3%) of base salary for officers and sergeants assigned to swing and/or relief swing and five percent (5%) of base salary for officers and sergeants assigned to the graveyard shift. The differential shall be available only to those employees actually performing duties on the covered shifts.

J. Assigned Positions
The City agrees to pay sworn employees designated to work a regular assigned position including Administrative Sergeant, Investigative Sergeant, and Training Sergeant, excluding patrol, an additional five percent (5%) of his/her base salary. This differential does not include sworn employees temporarily assigned to the position.

Sworn employees temporarily assigned shall have the work schedule adjusted to include a paid lunch. Officers receiving Specialty Pay incentive will retain pay incentive even when working shifts not related to the Specialty Pay.

91 K. Out-of-Class Work

a. Officer in Charge

During the absences of regular supervisors, a sworn officer shall be designated as Officer-in-Charge (OIC) to handle field supervision or station responsibilities as required. The OIC shall be compensated at a rate which is five percent (5%) above said employee’s existing salary rate for every hour worked in such temporary service. Any out-of-class work for which premium compensation is provided requires advanced written approval of the Chief of Police, or his or her designee.

b. Acting Commander

An employee who is appointed Acting Commander shall receive an hourly rate equal to five percent (5%) above said employee’s existing salary rate for every hour worked in such temporary assignment. Any out-of-class work for which premium compensation is provided requires advanced written approval of the Chief of Police, or his or her designee.

c. Acting Chief of Police

An employee who is appointed Acting Chief of Police shall receive an hourly rate equal to ten percent (10%) above said employee’s existing salary rate for every hour worked in such temporary appointment. Any out-of-class work for which premium compensation is provided requires advanced written approval of the Chief of Police, or his or her designee.

L. Uniforms

a. New Employees

The City shall provide all new members with a uniform which includes three (3) short sleeve shirts, three (3) long sleeve shirts, three (3) pants, one (1) tie, one (1) hat, and leathers and rain gear, as determined by the Chief of Police and as approved by the City Manager. The City shall also provide safety equipment, including weapons, ammunition, and body armor vest, as determined necessary by the Chief of Police and as approved by the City Manager. Each employee is responsible for the care, maintenance, and replacement of such uniforms. The City shall reimburse employees for the cost of serviceable uniforms damaged in the course of employment. In addition, each employee is responsible for the care and maintenance of the issued safety equipment.

b. Uniform Allowance

92 The City will compensate each employee an additional $75.00 per month ($900.00 annually) as payment for such maintenance and replacement. Such compensation shall be made semi-annually during the second pay period in January and the second pay period in July. Due to the retention payment mentioned in Article X.A.1, the July Uniform Allowance will be deferred to the first pay period in August of 2017.

Payment shall be made by a separate check and not as part of a regular paycheck.

Employees shall become eligible to receive the first semi-annual payment following their first anniversary date. With respect to the time between the employee’s first anniversary date and the semi-annual payment, the allowance will be prorated on a monthly basis with an employee having to work more than sixteen (16) days to receive payment for that month. The uniform allowance is considered a prospective payment and there shall be no payment or reimbursement upon separation from City service.

M. Work-Out

During the term of this MOU, the City and the Association agree to explore establishing an on-site gym to allow for possible work-out release time for officers.

N. K-9 Differential

An employee who is assigned as a K-9 officer will be paid an additional five percent (5%) of her/his salary.

O. Longevity Pay

Hercules Police Officer’s longevity pay is calculated as a percentage of their salary and the City will make the payments in 26 bi-weekly installments. Existing designated employees may qualify as being eligible for this provision on a forward going basis. The calculations are based on total public service sworn time and will be as follows in addition to the employee’s base salary:

At 5 years of service: 2 %
At 10 years of service: 4 %
At 15 years of service: 6 %
At 20 years of service: 8 %
At 25 years of service: 10%

P. Assigned Take-Home Department Vehicles

Employees holding certain specialized assignments may be assigned take-home City vehicles. These include City owned and City rented vehicles. Employees assigned take- home vehicles are not considered on duty and eligible for compensation for time spent driving to and from work in their City vehicle. Employees may be considered on duty and eligible for compensation when engaging in a law enforcement action while driving to or 93 from work.

Q. Assigned Position – Corporal

An employee who appointed Corporal will be paid an additional five percent (5%) of his/her base salary as described in Section K. This amount is intended to cover the additional effort and responsibilities associated with this position and will be paid to the employee during the entire period they serve in this assignment, whether or not they are working under the supervision of a police sergeant or have an assigned trainee.

This position incorporates the duties previously performed on an as needed basis by the Officer in Charge (OIC) and Field Training Officer (FTO) specialized assignments.

Employees who are not assigned Corporals may only perform OIC and FTO duties if they are on the current Corporal list and have the approval of the Patrol Division Commander.

R. Computer Loan Program

Eligible Employees: Regular full time employees that have completed their initial one-year probation period with the City. Employee must maintain a balance of up to 40 hours of vacation and/or compensatory time until the loan is paid in full. The hours employee must maintain will vary on the amount borrowed.

Maximum Loan Amount: The City will loan employees a maximum of $2,500 for the purchase of computer hardware and software. Employees may not have more than one loan outstanding at any time. If the purchase exceeds $2,500, the remainder of the purchase price is the employee’s responsibility. No interest will be charged by the City under this program.

ARTICLE XI - DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

Voluntary employee contributions may be made to the Deferred Compensation Plan through an authorized payroll deduction from the employee’s salary.

ARTICLE XII - EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

Members hired on or before 6/30/2011 shall receive the 3% at 50 PERS retirement formula through their employment with the City of Hercules to include final year compensation One Year Final Compensation pursuant to Section 20024.2 of the California Government Code. Members hired after 6/30/2011 but before 01/01/2013 shall receive the 3% at 55 PERS retirement formula through their employment with the City of Hercules to include final year compensation One Year Final Compensation pursuant to Section 20024.2 of the California Government Code. Members agree to pay the employee’s portion of nine percent (9%) pre-tax under the PERS Plan. In the event that the contribution amount is increased above the nine percent (9%) amount, the parties agree to meet and confer on the additional payment. Effective with the pay period beginning November 4, 2018, safety members will pay an additional 3% to be applied to the Employer CalPERS Contribution Rate.

94 The current MOU requires that the member employee pay the full member contribution effective July 1, 2011. Section 414(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code allows the public agency who is a member of PERS to designate employee retirement contributions required by the MOU, as being picked up by the employer and treated as employer contributions for tax purposes.

Members hired on or after 01/01/2013 shall receive the 2.7% at 57 PERS retirement formula, shall contribute 50% of the total annual normal cost of their pension benefit to the pension plan as determined by the City’s actuary and shall have their final compensation based on the employee’s highest annual compensation earnable averaged over a consecutive 36-month period. The City and members agree that all the provisions of AB 340 and AB 197 will be followed. Effective with the pay period beginning November 4, 2018, safety members will pay an additional 3% to be applied to the Employer CalPERS Contribution Rate.

An employee who retires may convert his/her unused sick leave balance to service credit as provided by Government Code Section 20965. If an employee elects to convert their entire balance of sick leave to service credit they must notify the City at least one year prior to the date of retirement.

The Association shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses or liability including, but not limited to, liability for back taxes, and all claims of any type by the IRS, Franchise Tax Board, Unit members or their heirs, successors or assigns arising out of this Agreement to pay or partially pay or "pick-up" an employee's contribution to PERS.

ARTICLE XIII - MEDICAL AND INSURANCE BENEFITS

A. Medical

1. The City contribution to the PERS health plan on behalf of all active and retired employees shall be minimum established by CalPERS which for the 2019 calendar year is $139.00.

2. Active employees shall commence cost sharing starting in calendar year 2020 based on a dollar amount equal to the premium of the Kaiser Bay Area Region plan as follow:

2020 Calendar Year

The City contribution shall be the 2019 Kaiser Bay Area Region plan rate plus the first 3% increase in cost. The Employee shall pay up to the next 3% increase in cost, with the City responsible for anything above a total of 6%.

2021 Calendar Year

The City contribution shall be its share of the 2020 Kaiser Bay Area Region plan rate 95 plus the first 3% increase in cost. The Employee shall pay up to the next 3% increase in cost, with the City responsible for anything above a total of 6%.

(For example, the City would only contribute an amount equal to the premium of the Kaiser Bay Area Region plan employee only coverage.)

3. If the employee chooses a plan where the premium exceeds the amount allowed, such excess shall be paid by the employee.

4. If the employee chooses a plan, which has a lower premium than the amount allowed, the employee shall not receive the difference in cash.

5. Supplemental Optional Monies Allowance for Retirees:

Eligibility

The City will provide an optional monetary allowance currently in the amount of $334.70 per month with an annual three percent adjustment on January 1st of each year to employees who retire as regulated by the Public Employee’s Retirement System. To be eligible for the optional monies, an employee must retire as follows:

1. Service Retirement: Employees who have served the City for at least ten (10) years prior to retirement and are at least fifty (50) years old when they separate service from the City.

2. Disability Retirement: Employees who retire with a disability retirement are not required to be a certain age, but must have at least twenty (20) years of service with the City.

To be eligible for the optional money allowance, employees must also have the minimum amount of sick leave on the books, as outlined in the chart below. If an employee has below the amount of sick leave required for their years of service, then they will only be eligible for the percentage paid equivalent to the amount of sick leave they do have on the books.

Additionally, employees must retire within one hundred twenty (120) days of separation from City employment to be eligible to receive the optional money allowance.

Years of Service Amount of sick leave hours on the
books on the day employee separates
service
Percentage of Optional Money
Available
10 480 50
11 528 55
12 576 60
13 624 65
14 672 70
96 15 720 75
16 768 80
17 846 85
18 864 90
19 912 95
20 960 100

21 960 100
22 960 100
23 960 100
24 960 100
25 No minimum amount required 100

Employees who separate service from the City of Hercules, but do not retire as a PERS annuitant within 120 days of separation, shall not be eligible for medical retirement under this program.

Retiree Reaches Age 65

The City will pay a portion of the optional money to a retiree until the retiree reaches age 65, upon which they are required to enroll in Medicare. At that time, the optional money will drop to an amount equivalent to the Kaiser Supplemental to Medicare rate through PERS. The retiree will be eligible for the same percentage of the Supplemental Optional Monies as they were eligible for under the Basic Optional Monies plan. Employees who are not eligible for Medicare must provide the City proof that they are not eligible for Medicare, either through their own employment history or their spouse and after providing such proof, the city will continue to pay the percentage of the Basic Optional Monies Plan. If proof is not provided, the City will automatically begin paying the Supplemental Optional Monies Plan percentages.

This benefit, which is effective January 1, 2001, is expected to last into perpetuity. The funds being established for this program may not be used by the City or HPOA for any purpose other than what is expressly stated in this section of the MOU. If in the future the City and HPOA mutually agree to end or modify this benefit, they can do so only for active employees. Any retiree who is currently receiving this benefit will continue to receive the benefit as stated in the MOU that was in effect at the time of their retirement. Conversely, if the City and HPOA increase this benefit, they can do so only for active employees and retiree benefits will remain the same as it was when they retired.

The City shall provide to the HPOA an annual statement of prior year balances in the medical retirement fund no later than December 31st of each year.

Payment

Payment will be made on a bi-annual basis. The optional money allowance for the months of January through June will be made the third week in July; July through December will 97 be paid the third week in January of each year. Checks will be mailed to the address on file. Supplemental Optional Money payments are subject to applicable Federal and State Income Tax regulations.

1. Medical Redirect - If an employee elects for no health coverage, and can demonstrate to the City on an annual basis that the employee has alterative health care coverage; the employee shall be entitled to use 50% of their eligible contribution to the compensation of their choice.

2. Vision/Dental - The City agrees that it will continue to pay the full premium for VSP and Delta Dental Insurance for the employee and their immediate family members if Medical Redirect option is exorcised by the employee.

B. Dental and Orthodontic

The City shall pay the premium for Delta Dental Plan, including orthodontic benefits, coverage for full-time employees plus eligible dependents.

Benefit summary:
 The City will provide Dental Insurance with a maximum benefit of $1,500 of coverage per calendar year for each family member.
 The City will provide 50% Orthodontic coverage with a lifetime maximum of $2,500 for each eligible family member.

C. Vision

The City has contracted with Vision Service Plan (VSP) in order to offer vision benefits to employees and eligible dependents. The City shall pay the premium for the VSP benefit for full-time employees plus eligible dependents.

Benefit summary:
 Vision Exam - $20.00 co-pay- every 12 months
 Prescription Glasses- $20.00 co-pay - every 12 months  Frames- $130 allowance for frame of choice/ 20% off amount over your allowance- every 12 months
 Contact Lenses – No co-pays applies – every 12 months ($130.00 allowance for contacts and the contact lens exam/fitting & evaluation)

Retirees may participate in the Vision Plan, provided the Plan will allow them to do so and the retiree pays the group rate plus the administrative fee that is allowed under COBRA laws (currently two (2) percent) to the City.

D. Other Insurance Benefits

98 The City will pay the monthly premiums for all full-time employees for life, long-term disability, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance. The insured valued benefit for each type of coverage is as follows:

1. Long-Term Disability - The City will provide Long Term Disability Premier (Plan B) through Police Officers Standards and Research (PORAC). The cost of said insurance plan shall be added to each employee’s salary. The employee will then pay the premium through payroll deduction.

2. Life - In the amount of $50,000.

3. Accidental Death and Dismemberment - In the amount of $50,000.

E. VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Program

VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Program allows employees to accumulate assests to pay for health insurance and out-of-pocket expenses in retirement.

Management agrees to open the contract to discuss the VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Program (and only this program), if the HPOA decides to participate in it.

ARTICLE XIV - LAY-OFF POLICY AND PROCEDURE

A. Discretion of City

Whenever it becomes necessary to abolish any position of employment, the employee holding such position of employment may be laid off or demoted without disciplinary action and without the right of appeal.

B. Notification

Employees to be laid off shall be given at least thirty (30)-calendar day’s prior notice.

C. Vacancy and Demotion

Except as otherwise provided, whenever there is a reduction in the work force, the appointing authority shall first demote to a vacancy, if any, in a lower class for which the employee who is the latest to be laid off in accordance with Section F below is qualified.

All persons so demoted shall have their names placed on the re-employment list.

D. Employee Rights

An employee affected by lay-off shall have the right to displace an employee who has less seniority in a lower class in the same class series or a lower classification in which the affected employee once had permanent status. For the purpose of this section and Section “E” below, seniority includes all periods of full-time service at or above the classification 99 level where lay-off is to occur.

E. Seniority

In order to retreat to a former or lower class, an employee must have more seniority than at least one of the incumbents in the retreat class and request displacement action in writing to the City Manager within five (5) working days of receipt of notice of lay-off.

Employees retreating to a lower or similar class shall be placed at the salary step representing the least loss of pay. In no case shall the salary be increased above that received in the class from which the employee was laid off.

Employees retreating to a lower or similar class shall serve a probationary period in a new class unless they have previously successfully completed a probationary period in the class or a class in the class series.

Whenever two (2) or more employees have the same hire date, the order of seniority shall be determined by lottery. The names of all employees having the same sworn date will be drawn at random, one (1) name at a time until all names are drawn. The order of selection shall determine the order of seniority, with the employee whose name is drawn first having the greater seniority. Lottery selection will be made by the Chief or his or her representative in the presence of an Association representative.

F. Employment Status

Employees shall be laid off in inverse order of seniority according to their date of hire as a full time sworn employee of the City of Hercules. Employees holding the rank of Sergeant shall be laid off in inverse order according to their date of promotion.

G. Re-employment List

The names of persons laid off or demoted in accordance with these rules shall be entered upon a re-employment list. Such list shall be used by the appointing authority when a vacancy arises in the same or lower class of position before certification is made from an eligible list.

H. Duration of Re-employment List

Names of persons laid off shall be carried on a re-employment list for one (1) year, except the persons appointed to permanent positions on the same level as that which laid off, shall, upon such appointment, be dropped from the list. Persons who refuse re-employment shall be dropped from the list. Persons re-employed in a lower class, or on a temporary basis, shall be continued on the list for the higher position for one (1) year.

ARTICLE XV - OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT AND OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES

100
A. General Prohibition

No employee shall engage in employment, activities, or enterprises for compensation of any kind or character which is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to his or her duties as an employee of the City or the duties, functions, or responsibilities of his or her position or the City itself.

B. Definition

For the purpose of this section, an employment activity or enterprise is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to those various duties, functions, or responsibilities set forth above if it:

a. Involves the use for private gain or advantage of the City’s time, facilities, equipment, or supplies; or except in limited cases of police officers, the badge, uniform, prestige, or influence of the City; or

b. Involves receipt or acceptance by a City employee of any money or other consideration from anyone other than the City for performing an act which the employee would be required or expected to perform in the regular course of working as a City employee; or

c. Involves the performance of an act in an outside capacity which may be subject directly or indirectly to the control, approval, inspection, review, audit, or enforcement of an officer, employee, or elected official of the City; or

d. Involves such time demands as would render performance of duties as a City employee less efficient, in the opinion of the Chief of Police and concurrence of the City Manager; or

e. Gives the appearance of involving or potentially involving the influence, directly or indirectly, or knowledge acquired by virtue of one’s City office or employment; or Involves an employment activity or enterprise which is inconsistent with the nature of the employment or professional standards called for by the employee’s position.

C. Chief of Police’s Approval

No employee shall be gainfully employed at any employment activity or enterprise outside of the City service without the prior approval from the Chief of Police. Such approval shall be denied only if the employment violates Section B of this Article.

D. Retroactive and Prospective Application

All provisions of this section shall apply to outside employment held by an employee on the effective date of this Agreement, as well as any outside employment sought after the 101
date of this Agreement. As to any outside employment held on the effective date of this Agreement which is not approved, the City Manager may allow a reasonable period, not to exceed one year, for the employee to cease such outside employment.

E. Grievance Authority

An employee dissatisfied with a decision of the Chief of Police under this section may request a review before the City Manager in a manner provided in Article XVII of this Agreement. The City Manager’s decision is final.

F. Penalty for Violation of this Section

An employee’s failure to abide by this section may be cause for disciplinary action and/or disciplinary action and/or dismissal.

ARTICLE XVI - DISCIPLINARY ACTION PROCEDURES

A. Applicability of This Section

1. The provisions of this article shall be administered in compliance with the requirements of State law governing police officer discipline set forth under Section 3303 of the California Government Code.

B. Grounds for Discipline

Causes for disciplinary action include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Fraud in securing appointment;

2. In competency, inefficiency, inexcusable neglect of duties, or failure to perform duties;

3. Insubordination;

4. Dishonesty;

5. Drunkenness on duty or chronic abuse of alcohol;

6. Addiction to or use of narcotics or habit-forming drugs;

7. Violation of City or departmental rules;

8. Misuse or appropriation of City property or funds;
102

9. Negligence or misconduct resulting in damage to public property or waste of public supplies;

10. Failure to follow adopted safety practices, or failure to properly use required personal protective gear or equipment;

11. Discourteous or non-cooperative treatment of the public or other City personnel;

12. Acceptance of gifts or gratuities for the performance of services, functions, or duties for which employee is retained by the City;

13. Conviction of a crime;

14. Engaging in any employment, activity, or enterprise which is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to performance of services, functions, and duties for which the employee is retained by the City;

15. Failure to maintain required licenses and certificates;

16. Failure to maintain eligibility for vehicle insurance coverage where driving is a requirement of the job classification. For purposes of this section, “driving is a requirement of the job classification” when the job description for the classification lists a driver’s license as one of the requirements for the position.

C. Delegation of Disciplinary Action

The City Manager may impose discipline or authorize any Department Head to discipline subordinate employees subject to these procedures.

D. Types of Discipline

The specific disciplinary actions which may be imposed against City employees are defined below. The City may also issue non-disciplinary letters of instruction. A letter of instruction shall be removed from the employee’s personnel file on completion of the annual evaluation subsequent to its issuance.

1. Written Reprimand

A written reprimand is a formal notice to an employee that his or her performance or behavior must be improved and that further disciplinary action, including additional reprimands, suspension, reduction in pay, demotion, or dismissal, may be taken unless the employee’s performance or behavior is improved.

a. The content of the written reprimand should include the following:

103
- A description of the action or activity necessitating a written reprimand; - The date(s) and time(s) of the action or activity causing the written reprimand.

b. The written reprimand should be prepared in duplicate and presented to the employee for his or her signature.

c. The written reprimand should then be distributed as follows:

- One copy to the employee;
- Copies to the Department Head and City Manager;
- One copy to the employee’s personnel file.

d. Employees shall have sixty (60) calendar days within which to respond to any adverse comments entered in his or her personnel file. Such responses shall be attached to the adverse comments.

e. There shall be no right to appeal a written reprimand beyond Level III review by the City Manager as provided above in this agreement.

f. After one (1) year, an employee may request that the Chief of Police remove a written reprimand from the employee’s record.

2. Suspension

a. Suspension is the temporary removal, without pay, of an employee from his or her duties.

b. The Chief of Police may suspend an employee for up to three (3) working days for each violation.

c. Suspensions of more than three (3) days are imposed by the City Manager.

There shall be no right to appeal suspensions of three (3) days or less beyond a Level III review by the City Manager as described in Article XVII of this Agreement.

3. Demotion

a. A demotion is the removal of an employee from his or her existing position to a lower paying position.

b. All demotions shall follow the guidelines of the Disciplinary Procedures in Section E below.

c. The rejection of an employee who is serving in a probationary promotional position and subsequent removal is a failure by the employee to satisfactorily 104
complete the promotional testing process. Such an employee would be returned to his or her prior position. Such a rejection and removal is not disciplinary action subject to this Agreement.

4. Reduction in Pay

a. A reduction in pay within an employee’s salary range represents a permanent or temporary lowering of an employee’s salary rate, with a corresponding reduction in all other salary-based fringe benefits.

b. Reduction in pay resulting from the rejection of an employee who is serving in a probationary promotional position and is rejected during that period is not a disciplinary action subject to these procedures.

5. Discharge

a. Discharge is the permanent removal of an employee from the City’s service.

b. Job abandonment as defined in the City’s Rules and Regulations is neither a “discharge” nor disciplinary action, but is construed as the voluntary resignation of the employee.

E. Disciplinary Appeal Process

1. Upon the suspension without pay, demotion, reduction in pay, or discharge of an employee who is an Association member, the procedures described in Section 3 below shall be followed.

2. These procedures shall also constitute the administrative appeal rights and 105
protections afforded by the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Government Code Sections 3300 et seq.)

3. These disciplinary appeal procedures include notice and four Levels (I, II, III, IV) of Response.

a. Preliminary Notice of Possible Disciplinary Action

No employee for whom this section applies shall be subject to disciplinary action unless prior to the action the employee has received:

i. Notice of possible disciplinary action, including the specific nature of such discipline;

ii. A written copy of the charges and the grounds for such charges;

iii. Copies of all relevant materials upon which the charges are based; and

iv. Notice of a reasonable time which shall not be less than seven (7) calendar days within which to respond orally and/or in writing to the charges or schedule a meeting at which to respond orally to the charges.

b. Notice of Disciplinary Action Taken

1. No disciplinary action shall be taken against an employee until the time period provided herein has passed for a response from the employee to the notice of possible disciplinary action and no response was received, or after the employee has responded to the preliminary notice of disciplinary action.

2. Thereafter, the employee shall be given written notice of the discipline to be imposed, if any, including the charges and the grounds for such charges, as well as notice of the employee’s appeal rights under these provisions.
c. Appeals

1. A “disciplinary appeal” is a formal written objection or challenge to any disciplinary action, including dismissal, demotion, suspension, or reduction in salary. The reduction in pay or change in assignment which occurs in the course of regular rotation is not punitive and shall not be subject to this grievance procedure.
106

2. Appeal of Written Reprimand or Suspension of Three (3) Days or Less

A written reprimand or suspension of three (3) days or less may be appealed in writing to the City Manager within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of the notice of disciplinary action.

The City Manager, within a reasonable time, shall conduct a hearing and render a written decision which shall be final

3. Appeal of Suspension of More Than Three (3) Days, Demotion, Reduction in Pay, or Discharge

An employee shall have the right to an appeal of a disciplinary action involving a suspension of more than three (3) days, a demotion, a reduction in pay and/or discharge. The procedures described in Sections 1 through 5 below shall be followed for all appeals.

1. Notice

(1) Within fifteen (15) calendar days of receiving a written notice of disciplinary action, the employee may submit
a written request to the City Manager for a hearing before a hearing officer from the California Office of Mediation and Conciliation.

(2) The parties shall request that State Mediation and
Conciliation supply a list of seven (7) names of
persons experienced in hearing public employment
discipline matters. If the City and the Association are unable to mutually agree on a hearing officer, each party shall alternately strike a name from the list until only one remains. The order of strike shall be determined by lot.

(3) The hearing shall be scheduled within sixty (60) days of such a request unless both parties agree to waive this
provision.

(4) Written notice of the hearing shall be given to the employee and his/her representative, if any, promptly
upon the scheduling of the hearing, but in no event shall the hearing be scheduled with less than twenty (20) days notice. For good cause, the Hearing Officer may grant a continuance.
107
(5) This notice shall be mailed by ordinary mail and also by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the
employee’s last address of record on file in the Personnel Office. The employee bears the burden of keeping a
current address on file.

2. Appearance; Representation; Witnesses; Conduct of Hearing

(1) At the administrative hearing, the employee and the City Manager shall each be entitled to representation.

(2) An official record shall be made of the hearing by a certified court reporter. The cost of a transcript shall be borne by the party requesting a transcript. Such
transcript shall be the official record of the proceeding; however, either party may tape record the proceedings.

(3) The hearing may be public or closed, at the employee’s option. Both the employee and City may designate a
person who shall not be subject to exclusion as a witness and who has investigated the matter at issue in the
hearing and whose assistance during the hearing is
necessary to the efficient conduct of the hearing.

Witnesses shall be subject to cross examination.

(4) The hearing shall proceed generally as follows:

(1) The City and the employee or his or her
representative may make opening statements.

(2) The City shall present evidence in support of the
City’s position. The employee may present
evidence on his or her behalf.

(3) Both the City and the employee may subpoena
witnesses and present rebuttal evidence as they
deem necessary and appropriate.

(4) The Hearing Officer shall rule on any objections made to the admissibility of evidence or
otherwise relating to the conduct of the hearing.

Such rulings shall be final. Hearsay evidence
shall be admissible but shall not form the sole
basis for a finding.
108

(5) The City and the employee may make closing
statements.

(6) Written briefs shall be submitted at the request
of either party.

3. Hearing Officer’s Decision

(1) Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall cause proposed findings and recommendations to
be prepared in writing and shall certify the same.

(2) The Hearing Officer shall, at a minimum, find whether the City has shown that the charges in support of the
disciplinary action have been substantiated. Such a
finding shall be made as to each charge. If the Hearing Officer finds that none of the charges are supported by the evidence presented, the recommendation shall be
that no disciplinary action be taken. If the Hearing
Officer finds that any or all the charges are supported, he/she shall either:

Recommendations shall be filed as a permanent record
with the City Manager. The City Manager shall deliver
a certified copy of such findings and recommendations
to the City Council and to the employee affected by such findings and recommendations.

(4) If, due to any cause, a hearing cannot be held and an employee is consequently denied such a hearing within
the time stated herein, action shall be deferred until a hearing can be scheduled.
(1) Recommend that the proposed disciplinary
action be carried out;
(2) Recommend that no disciplinary action be
taken; or
(3) Recommend that the proposed disciplinary
action be modified.
(3) The Hearing Officer’s findings and

109
(5) The cost of the Hearing Officer shall be borne by the City. All other costs shall be the responsibility of the party incurring them.

4. City Council Action

(1) The City Council shall have the following options with respect to the Hearing Officer’s findings and
recommendations:

* Adopt the findings and recommendations as
prepared;

* Modify the findings and recommendations; or

* Reject the Hearing Officer’s findings and
recommendations and adopt separate Council
findings and recommendations.

(2) If the findings and recommendations of the Hearing
Officer are adopted as proposed, the members of the City Council need not review the record of the hearing
before the Hearing Officer. Otherwise, the
Council shall review such record.

(3) The employee will be notified pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 that he or she
has ninety (90) calendar days within which to file an
appeal in Superior Court of the Council’s decision.

ARTICLE XVII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

A. Definitions

a. A “grievance” is an allegation by an employee or group of employees who claim to have been adversely affected by an alleged violation, misinterpretation, or misapplication of a specific provision of this Agreement, the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations or Police Department Policies.

b. A “grievant” is an employee adversely affected by an alleged violation, misinterpretation, or misapplication of a specific provision of this Agreement, or the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations or the Association specifically naming one or more such individuals.

B. General Provisions
110

1. Until final disposition of a grievance, the grievant shall comply with the directions of the grievant’s immediate supervisor.

2. All documents dealing with the processing of a grievance shall be filed separately from the personnel files of the employee.

3. Time limits for appeal provided at any level of this procedure shall begin the first day following receipt by the grievant of the written decision.

4. If any grievance meeting or hearing is scheduled during duty hours, any employee required by either party to participate as a witness or grievant in such meeting or hearing shall be released for a reasonable period of time from regular duties without loss of pay.

5. An employee may at any time present grievances to the City and have such grievances adjusted without the intervention of the Association, as long as the adjustment is not inconsistent with the terms of an applicable Memorandum of Understanding. The City shall not agree to a resolution of the grievance until the affected Association has received a copy of the grievance and the proposed resolution and has been given the opportunity to file a response. Upon request of the grievant, the grievant may be represented at any stage of the grievance procedure by a representative of the Association.

6. Time limits may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties.

C. Procedures

1. Level I - Information/Resolution

a. An employee who believes he or she has a grievance shall present the grievance orally to the immediate supervisor within fifteen (15) calendar days after the grievant knew, or reasonably should have known, of the circumstances which form the basis for the grievance.

b. Failure to do so will render the grievance null and void.

c. The immediate supervisor shall hold discussions and attempt to resolve the matter within fifteen (15) calendar days after the presentation of the grievance.

d. It is the intent of this informal meeting procedure that at least one personal conference be held between the aggrieved employee and the immediate supervisor.

2. Level II - Formal Written Grievance

a. If the grievance is not settled during the informal conference and the 111
grievant wishes to press the matter, the grievant shall present the grievance in writing to the Commander within fifteen (15) calendar days after the oral decision by the immediate supervisor.
b. The written information shall include:

1. A description of the specific grounds of the grievance, including names, dates, and places necessary for a complete understanding of the grievance;

2. The provisions of this Agreement or the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations which are alleged to have been violated;

3. The reasons why the immediate supervisor’s proposed resolution of the problem is unacceptable;

4. The specific actions requested of the City which will remedy the grievance.

c. The Commander shall communicate the decision to the grievant in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving the grievance. If the Commander does not respond within the time limits, the grievant may appeal to the next level.

d. Within the above time limits, either party may request a personal conference.

3. Level III - Appeal to the Chief of Police

a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level II, the grievant may within fifteen (15) calendar days of the receipt of the decision at Level II appeal the decision to the Chief of Police. The grievant shall present the grievance in writing to the Chief of Police within fifteen (15) calendar days after the decision by the Commander.

b. The written information shall include:

1. a description of the specific grounds of the grievance, including names, dates, and places necessary for a complete understanding of the grievance;

2. the provisions of this Agreement or the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations which are alleged to have been violated; 112

3. the reasons why the Commander’s proposed resolution of the problem is unacceptable;

4. the specific actions requested of the City which will remedy the grievance.

c. The Chief of Police shall communicate the decision to the grievant in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving the grievance. If the Chief of Police does not respond within the time limits, the grievant may appeal to the next level.

d. Within the above time limits, either party may request a personal conference.

4. Level IV - Advisory Mediation

a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level III, either party by mutual agreement, may request the assistance of a mediator from the Mediation and Conciliation Service of the State of California.

b. The grievant must make his/her written request to submit the grievance to advisory mediation within fifteen (15) calendar days of the receipt of the decision at Level III.

c. The City and the Association shall mutually agree upon a mediator from the Mediation and Conciliation Service of the State of California.

Those present at mediation shall include the Assistant City Manager, or the person the City Manager designates, the Chief of Police, the grievant, and his/her representative .

d. The proceedings shall be tape recorded, including the opinion of the State mediator. The taped recording shall be sealed, signed, and dated by both parties. A written transcription shall be provided to both parties, if requested.

e. The mediator shall have no authority to resolve the grievance. In the event the grievance is not resolved, neither stipulations, admission, settlement proposals nor concessions agreed to or offered during the mediation shall be admissible at any subsequent hearing.

5. Level V - Appeal to the City Manager

a. If advisory mediation fails, the grievant may within fifteen (15) calendar days file a written appeal to the City Manager.
b. The statement of appeal shall include a copy of the original grievance and a clear, co n cis e statement of the reasons for the appeal to Level V. c. Within the fifteen (15) calendar days, the City Manager shall complete fact- finding which may include review of the mediation transcript, 113
scheduling a meeting with the grievant, Chief of Police, and their representatives, if any.
d. The City Manager shall communicate his or her decision to the grievant within fifteen (15) calendar days of the completion of fact-finding. e. The decision of the City Manager shall be final in resolving all employee grievances.

ARTICLE XVIII - WAIVER CLAUSE

Except as otherwise provided herein, no changes or modifications of this Agreement shall be offered, urged, or otherwise presented by the Association or the City during the term of this Agreement, provided, however, that nothing herein shall prevent the parties to this Agreement from meeting and conferring and making modifications herein by mutual consent. Any additions or changes in this Agreement shall not be effective unless reduced to writing and properly executed by both parties.

ARTICLE XIX - SEVERABILITY

If any provision of the Agreement, or the application of such provision to any persons or circumstances, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

ARTICLE XX - DURATION

This Agreement shall be effective July 1, 2024, and shall continue in full force and effect until June 30, 2025, and become amendable thereafter. The City and the Association shall meet prior to June 30, 2025 and confer on a successor M.O.U.

ARTICLE XXI - PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS

The Personnel Rules and Regulations which shall hereafter be adopted by the City shall control and determine any matters or subjects not specifically provided for herein. The Association shall have the opportunity to meet and consult with management on said Personnel Rules and Regulations prior to their adoption by the City Council. 114
FOR THE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION:

Chris Costa Date
HPOA President

Jonathan Fernandez Date
HPOA Negotiator

_________________________________ ________________________ Kyle Johnson Date
HPOA Negotiator

FOR THE CITY:

Dante Hall Date
City Manager
115

DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION

AGENDA ITEMS

1. 22-994

2. 22-995

3. 22-998

4. 22-996

5. 22-997

116

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of October 22, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Michael Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with LSA Associates, Inc. in the amount of $132,101 to Secure the Environmental Permits, Complete the Final Design, and Perform Analytical Testing on the Spoils for the Lake Refugio Dredging Project and appropriating $32,101 from the General Fund/Capital Reserves to fully fund the Agreement RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with LSA Associates, Inc. (“LSA”) for a not to exceed amount of $ 132,101 to secure the environmental permits, complete the final design, and perform analytical testing on the spoils for the Lake Refugio Dredging Project and appropriating $32,101 from the General Fund/Capital Reserves to fund the agreement fully.

BACKGROUND:

Lake Refugio was last dredged in 2005. During large storm events, sediment is conveyed down Refugio Creek and settles to the bottom of the lake. Over time, the lake has gradually filled, creating shallow areas that are unattractive and conducive to algae blooms during the warm summer months, when the lake is also stagnant due to lower flows. The algae blooms have proved very difficult to treat despite using aerator fountains and regular chemical treatments.

In 2018, LSA was selected to complete the 30% dredging plans and assist in obtaining the required permits from the regulatory agencies. Substantial progress was made then; however, the project stalled when the dredging was estimated to cost between $500K- $1M. The range was due to whether the estimated 6,300 cubic yards of spoils had to be 22-994
117
hauled off to an approved disposal facility versus spread in City open space. The estimate also included funding for mitigation , which the Regional Water Quality Control Boar d indicated would be required, and consultant support during construction. Due to the high cost and City’s financial position at the time, the project did not advance.

Given the urgency of removing the sediment from the lake and the one -time General Fund/Capital Reserves monies that are now available, it is proposed that the Lake Refugio Dredging Project resume at this time. To this end, staff requested LSA provide a proposal to update and build upon their prior work of securing the necessary permits, completing the 100% design for bidding purposes, and testing the soil to determine the proper disposal methodology. LSA is on the city’s pre-qualified vendor list, has performed well in prior work, and is familiar with the project.

ANALYSIS:

LSA’s scope of work includes a bathymetric survey, soil sampling/analysis, preparation of sediment dredging plans, and prepar ation of permit applications. LSA would prepare the permit applications, including the biological assessment, while Balance Hydrologics, as a sub -consultant to LSA, would conduct the bathymetric survey and prepare the sediment dredging plans. Terraphase Engineering would complete the sampling and analysis of the pond sediments for reuse or disposal. This work would build upon and update the preliminary design and studies completed in 2019.

The full scope of LSA’s work for the Lake Refugio Dredging Project is detailed in their proposal (Attachment #2).

Preliminarily, it is estimated that the total cost to dredge, including biological monitoring and engineering support, could vary from $400K to $600K, depending upon the bid climate. If the dredged material has to be hauled to a disposal facility based on the soil testing results, this could add an additional $450K to the project cost. Lastly, if the regulatory agencies require mitigation and 5 -year reporting and monitoring, it could cost roughly an extra $150K.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The FY 24 -25 Adopted Budget includes $100K in General Fund/Capital Reserves for Preliminary Engineering, Environmental Compliance, and Permitting. Because the proposal for environmental permitting services exceeded the in-house estimate, staff requests that the Council appropriate an additional $32,101 from General Fund/Capital Reserves to fully fund the agreement with LSA for a total of $132,101 . Once the project has been sufficiently advanced to obtain a firm estimate of the total project costs, staff will report back to the City Council with a recommended funding plan.

118
ATTACHMENTS:

Attach 1- Resolution
Attach 2 – Agreement

Financial Impact
Description: Lake Refugio Dredging (Project #63039)
Funding Source: General Fund Capital Reserve (300-6432-642.05-00) Budget Recap:

Total Estimated cost: $32,101 New Revenue: None
Amount Budgeted: Lost Revenue: N/A
New funding required: Yes New Personnel: N/A
Council Policy Change: Yes No

119
RESOLUTION NO. 24-

RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF HERCULES

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $132,101 TO SECU RE

THE ENVIRONMENTAL PE RMITS, COMPLETE THE FINAL DESIGN , AND

PERFORM ANALYTICAL T ESTING ON THE SPOILS FOR THE LAKE REFUGI O DREDGING PROJECT AND APPROPRIATING $32,1 01 FROM THE GENERAL

FUND/CAPITAL RESERVES TO FULLY FUND THE AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, Lake Refugio is filling in with sediment which is both unsightly an d conducive to algae blooms; and

WHEREAS, LSA Associates, Inc. (“LSA”) is on the City’s pre -approved vendor list and completed preliminary planni ng, environmental, and engineering work on the project beginning in 2018; and

WHEREAS, LSA has submitted a proposal for $132,101 to secure the environmental permits, complete the final design, and perform analytical testing needed to put the project out to bid; and

WHEREAS, the FY 24 -25 Adopted Budget includes $100K in General Fund/Capital Reserves for Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Compliance, and the proposal for those services exceeded the in-house estimate by $32,101.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with LSA for a not to exceed amount of $ 132,101 to secure the environmental permits, complete the final design, and perform analytical testing o f the s oils for the Lake Refugio Dredging Project and appropriating $32,101 from the General Fund/Capital Reserves to fully fund the agreement.

The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the twenty-second day of October, 2024 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

____________________________
Dan Romero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Eibleis Melendez, City Clerk
120

CITY OF HERCULES

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This A
greement (“Agreement”) for professional services is made on October 22, 2024, between the City of Hercules, a California municipality (“City”), and LSA Associates, Inc. a corporation (“Consultant”) (individually, a “Party,” and collectively, the “Parties”).

1. Scope of S
ervices. Consultant will provide to City the professional services described in the Scope of Services, attached as Attachment A and incorporated in this Agreement (the “Services”). Only the City Council or the City Manager may authorize any change or addition to the Scope of Services specified in Attachment A.

2. Term. Thi
s Agreement will become effective on October 22, 2024 (“Effective Date”), and will terminate upon the full and satisfactory completion of the Services or as otherwise specified in Attachment A, unless terminated sooner in accordance with Section 10 of this Agreement. Time is of the essence with respect to all provisions of this Agreement that specify a time for performance.

3. Compensation. For the full and satisfactory completion of the Services, City will pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed (ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND ONE DOLLARS $132,101), without prior written authorization by City, pursuant to the terms set forth in Attachment B on Payment, which is attached to and incorporated in this Agreement. Consultant’s compensation is intended to encompass all costs required for performing the Services, including overhead and indirect costs. Except as expressly provided in Attachment B, Consultant will not be entitled to reimbursement for expenses it incurs to provide the Services.

3.1 Payment
. City will pay Consultant for Services satisfactorily provided during each calendar month within 30 days following City receipt and approval of a detailed invoice. The invoice must include, at a minimum: a description of the specific Services provided; the name of the individual providing the Services; the date(s) upon which the Services were provided; the time spent providing the Services; the amount due for the Services ; and the basis for calculating the amount due.

3.2 Addit
ional Services. If the City requests related services beyond the Scope of Services described in Attachment A, the Consultant will provide City a written estimate for the additional services (“Additional Services”). Consultant will not provide Additional Services until Consultant has received written authorization from the City to perform the Additional Services .

Consultant will not be entitled to payment for Additional Services performed without City’s prior written authorization or for costs to correct Consultant’s errors or omissions.

4. Independent C
ontractor. The Parties agree that Consultant will act as an independent contractor under this Agreement and will have control of its work and the manner in which the Services are performed. Consultant is not an employee of City and is not entitled to participate in any health, retirement, or similar employee benefits from the City.

Agreement No. 24-064
Council Resolution No.__________
121

5. Consultant’s Warranties.

5.1 Consul
tant warrants that all Services provided under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and standards for Consultant’s profession in the Bay Area.

5.2 Consul
tant warrants that all Services provided under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, conflict of interest laws and City ordinances and policies.

5.3 Consul
tant warrants that Consultant has no present interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of Services on the City’s behalf.

5.4 Cons
ultant warrants that it will comply with the City’s Nepotism and Cronyism Policy (Hercules Municipal Code § 2-3.401 et seq.) and the City’s California Equal Pay Act Compliance Policy (Hercules Municipal Code § 2-3.501 et seq.).

6. Noti
ce. Any notice, billing, or payment required by this Agreement must be made in writing, and sent to the other P arty by personal delivery, U.S. Mail, a reliable overnight deliv ery service, or by e mail as a PDF (or comparable) file. Notice is effective upon delivery unless otherwise specified. Notice for each Party will be given as follows:

City:

Consultant:

City
of Hercules LSA Associates, Inc.
111 Civic Drive 157 Park Place
Hercules, CA 94547 Point Richmond, California 94801
(510) 799-8200 Phone: 510-236-6810
Attn: City Clerk Attn: Dan Sidle
[email protected]
Copy to: Mike Roberts Copy to:

Ema
il: [email protected] Email:

7. Indemn
ity. Subsection 7.1 is not applicable to this Agreement if Consultant’s Services are “design professional” services as that term is used and defined in Civil Code section 2782.8.

Subsection 7.2 is applicable to this Agreement if Consultant’s Services are “design professional” services as used and defined in Civil Code section 2782.8.

7.1 T o t
he full extent permitted by law, Consultant will indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to City, and hold harmless City, its governing body, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers (collectively, “City Indemnitees”) from and against any and all liability, demands, loss, damage, claims, settlements, expenses, and costs (including, without limitation, attorney fees, expert witness fees, and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively, “ Liability”) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s acts or omissions with respect to this Agreement, except such Liability caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of any of the City Indemnitees. This indemnification obligation is not limited by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable under Workers’ Compensation or other employee benefit acts, or by insurance coverage limits, and will survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement. This Subsection 7.1 does not apply if the Services to be provided 122
under this Agreement are design professional services provided by a licensed architect, landscape architect, professional engineer, or professional land surveyor.

7.2 To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its City Council, officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses and costs (including, without limitation, attorney fees and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively, “Liability”) of every nature which arises out of, pertains to, or relates to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, except such Liability caused by the active negligence, sole negligence or willful misconduct of City. This indemnification obligation is not limited by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable under Workers’ Compensation or other employee benefit acts, or by insurance coverage limits, and will survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement. This Subsection 7.2 is applicable if the Services to be provided under this Agreement are design professional services provided by a licensed architect, landscape architect, professional engineer, or professional land surveyor.

8. Insurance. Before providing any Services under this Agreement, Consultant is required to procure and provide proof of the insurance coverage required by this Section in the form of certificates and endorsements. Each certificate of insurance must state that the coverage afforded by the policy or policies will not be reduced, cancelled or allowed to expire without at least 30 days written notice to City, unless due to nonpayment of premiums, in which case at least 10 days written notice will be made to City. The required insurance must cover the activities of Consultant and its employees or subcontractors relating to or arising from the performance of the S ervices, and must remain in full force and effect at all times during the term of the Agreement. All required insurance must be issued by an insurer licensed to do business in the State of California, and each such insurer must have an A.M. Best financial strength rating of “A” or better and a financial size rating of “VIII” or better. If Consultant fails to provide any of the required coverage, City may, at its sole discretion, purchase such coverage at Consultant’s expense and deduct the cost from payments due to Consultant.

8.1 The following insurance policies and limits are required for this Agreement:

8.1.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance (“CGL”) . CGL insurance issued on an occurrence basis, including coverage of liability arising from Consultant’s acts or omissions in the performance of Services under this Agreement, with limits of at least $1,000,000.00 per occurrence.

8.1.2 Automotive. Commercial automotive liability coverage for owned, non- owned and hired vehicles must provide coverage of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury, death, or property damage.

8.1.3 Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability. The policy must comply with the requirements of the California Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Safety Act, with limits of at least $1,000,000.00. If Consultant is self- insured, Consultant must provide its duly authorized Certificate of Permission to Self-Insure.

123

8.1.4 Professional Liability. This in surance must insure against Consultant ’s errors and omissions in the provision of S ervices under this Agreement, in an amount no less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit.

8.2 Subrogation Waiver. Each required policy must include an endorsement that the insurer agrees to waive any right of subrogation it may have against City or the City’s insurers.

8.3 The CGL policy and the automotive liability policy must include the following endorsements:

(1) The City, including its Council, officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers and consultants (collectively, “ Additional Insured”) must be named as an additional insured for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured, and the policy must protect the Additional Insured against any and all liability for personal injury, death or property damage or destruction arising directly or indirectly in the performance of the Agreement.

(2) The inclusion of more than one insured will not operate to impair the rights of one insured against another, and the coverages afforded will apply as though separate policies have been issued to each insured.

(3) The insurance provided is primary and no insurance held or owned by City will be called upon to contribute to a loss.

(4) Any umbrella or excess insurance must contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage will also apply on a primary or non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self -insurance will be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

9. Dispute Resolution. In the event that any dispute arises between the Parties in relation to this Agreement, the Parties agree to meet face to face as soon as possible to engage in a good faith effort to resolve the matter informally. In the event that any dispute arises between the Parties in relation to this Agreement, and the dispute is not resolved by informal discussions, the Parties agree to submit the dispute to mediation.

9.1 Either Party may give written notice to the other Party of a request to submit a dispute to mediation, and a mediation session must take place within 60 days after the date that such notice is given, or sooner if reasonably practicable. The Parties will jointly appoint a mutually acceptable mediator. The Parties further agree to share equally the costs of the mediation, except costs incurred by each Party for representation by legal counsel.

9.2 Good faith participation in mediation pursuant to this Section is a condition precedent to either Party commencing litigation in relation to the dispute.

10. Early Termination.

10.1 Termination for Convenience. City may terminate this Agreement for convenience by giving 10 calendar days written notice to Consultant. In the event City elects to terminate the Agreement without cause, it will pay Consultant for Services satisfactorily provided up to that date. 124

10.2 Term
ination for Cause. If either Party breaches this Agreement by failing to timely or satisfactorily perform any of its obligations or otherwise violates the terms of this Agreement, the other Party may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice five calendar days prior to the effective date of termination, specifying the reason and the effective date of the termination.

Consultant will be entitled to payment for all Services satisfactorily provided up to the effective date of termination, except that the City may deduct from that payment the amount of costs the City incurred, if any, because of Consultant’s breach of the Agreement.

11. Wor
k Product. City will be the sole owner of all rights to any work product in any form which has been prepared by Consultant on City ’s behalf pursuant to this Agreement, unless otherwise specified in writing by the Parties.

12. Records. U
nless otherwise specified in Attachment A, C onsultant will maintain records related to this Agreement for a period of four years from expiration or termination of this Agreement, including records of the Services performed, on a daily basis if necessary.

Consultant’s accounting systems will conform to generally accepted accounting principles, and all records will provide a breakdown of total costs charged under this Agreement, including properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, and vouchers. Consultant will permit City to inspect and examine Consultant’s books, records, accounts, and any and all data relevant to this Agreement at any reasonable time.

13. Genera
l Provisions.

13.1 Assi
gnment and Successors. Consultant may not assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement, in part or in whole, without City’s written consent. This Agreement is binding on Consultant’s and City’s lawful heirs, successors, and permitted assigns.

13.2 Thi
rd Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement.

13.3 Nondiscr
imination. Consultant will not discriminate in the employment of persons under this Agreement because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, age, medical condition, disability, or other prohibited basis. All nondiscrimination rules or regulations required by law to be included in this Agreement are incorporated by this reference.

13.4 Restr
ictions on Nepotism and Cronyism . Consultant must comply with the regulations adopted by the City to avoid favoritism or discrimination in the award of contracts, as set forth in section 2 -3.401 et seq. of the City’s Municipal Code. Consultant must complete the “Contractor Acknowledgment of City of Hercules Nepotism and Cronyism Policy,” using the form attached as Attachment C to this Agreement, and submit a fully executed copy with the executed Agreement.

13.5 Com
pliance with the California Equal Pay Act. Consultant must comply with the regulations adopted by the City to allow for verification of Consultant compliance with the requirements of the California Equal Pay Act, as set forth in section 2-3.501 et seq. of the City’s Municipal Code. Consultant must complete the “Contractor Acknowledgment of Compliance with the California Equal Pay Act,” using the form attached as Attachment D to this Agreement, and submit a fully executed copy with the executed Agreement.
125

13.6 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement will be governed by California law, and venue will be in the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and no other place.

13.7 Integration. This Agreement and the documents incorporated in this Agreement constitute the final, complete, and exclusive terms of the agreement between the City and the Consultant.

13.8 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, in part or in whole, the remaining provisions of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

13.9 Amendment. No amendment or modification of this Agreement will be binding unless it is in a writing duly authorized and signed by the Parties to this Agreement.

13.10 Provisions Deemed Inserted. Every provision of law required to be inserted in this Agreement will be deemed to be inserted, and this Agreement will be construed and enforced as though included. If it is discovered that through mistake or otherwise that any required provision is not inserted, or not correctly inserted, this Agreement will be amended to make the insertion or correction.

13.11 Precedence. If any provision in any document attached to or incorporated in this Agreement conflicts with or is inconsistent with the provisions set forth in the body of this Agreement, the provisions set forth in the body of this Agreement will control over any such conflicting or inconsistent provisions.

13.12 Waiver. No waiver of a breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the P arty waiving the breach, failure, right, or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure, right, or remedy will be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right, or remedy, whether or not similar, nor will any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.

13.13 Force Majeure. If either Party is delayed or hindered in or prevented from the performance of any act required under this Agreement because of strikes, lockouts, inability to procure labor or materials, failure of power, riots, insurrection, war, fire or other casualty, or other reason beyond the reasonable control of the P arty delayed, excluding financial inability (“Force Majeure Event”), performance of that act will be excused for the period during which the Force Majeure Event prevents such performance, and the period for that performance will be extended for an equivalent period. Delays or failures to perform resulting from lack of funds will not be Force Majeure Events.

13.14 Headings. The headings in this Agreement are included for convenience only and will not affect the construction or interpretation of any provision in this Agreement or any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.

13.15 Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.
126

13.16 Aut
horization. Each individual signing below warrants that he or she is authorized to do so by the Party that he or she represents, and that this Agreement is legally binding on that Party. If Consultant is a corporation, signatures from two officers of the corporation are required pursuant to California Corporation Code section 313.
[Si
gnature page follows.]
127
The Parties agree to this Agreement as witnessed by the signatures below:

CITY:

Approved as to form:
s/_______________________________
s/__________________________________
________________________________ ___________________________________ D
ante Hall, City Manager Patrick Tang, City Attorney
Date: _______________
____________ Date: ______________________________
Attest:
s/_______________________________

_________________________________
Eibl
eis Melendez, City Clerk
Date: _____
______________________
CONSU
LTANT: ___________________________________________________ Business Name
s/_______________________________
_________________________________
Name
/Title
Date: _____
_______________________
s/_______________________________

_________________________________
Name
/Title
Date: _____
_______________________
Attachm
ents:

Attac
hment A: Scope of Services
Attachment B: Payment
Attachment C: Contractor Acknowledgment of City of Hercules Nepotism and Cronyism Policy Attachment D: Contractor Acknowledgment of Compliance with the California Equal Pay Act LSA Associates, Inc.

Anthony Petros, CEO
October 10, 2024
128
Septe
mber 11, 2024
Michael Roberts, PE
Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Hercules
111 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94519
Subject: Proposal for Providing Permitting Services, Soil Sampling & Analysis, and Design Services for the Refugio Valley Park Pond Dredging Project, Hercules, Contra Costa County Dear Mr. Roberts:

Per your request, LSA is submitting this proposal to conduct a bathymetric survey, complete soils sampling/analysis, prepare sediment dredging plans, and prepare permit applications for the Refugio Valley Park Pond Dredging Project in the City of Hercules. LSA would prepare the permit applications, including the biological assessment, while Balance Hydrologics (Balance), as a sub- consultant to LSA, would conduct the bathymetric survey and prepare the sediment dredging plans.

Terraphase Engineering (Terraphase) would complete the sampling and analysis of the pond sediments for reuse or disposal. This work will build upon the and update the studies that were completed in 2019.

Our proposed scope of work, budget, and terms are described below.

LSA SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1: Prepare Biological Assessment
LSA will prepare a biological assessment that addresses sensitive biological resources subject to agency permitting requirements. An LSA biologist will conduct a field survey to evaluate the potential for the occurrence of listed species on the project site. The evaluation will be based on an assessment of the habitats present and the site’s suitability to support listed species known from this region. Prior to conducting the field survey, LSA will search the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare Plants, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information, Planning, and Consultation System, and other sources for occurrence records of listed species in the project vicinity. In the field, LSA will identify the cover types and habitats present onsite (for both federally listed and other special-status species) and note any species observed. LSA will prepare a report that includes the results of the field survey, an assessment of the suitability of the habitats to support listed species, and an evaluation of potential occurrence of listed species on the site or in the vicinity.

Attachment A: Scope of Services
Attachment B: Payment
129
Task 2: Prepare U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Report and Nationwide Permit Application
LSA will prepare an application and Pre-construction Notification for a Nationwide Permit #16 – Dredging Maintenance for submittal to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Corps (USACE). As required by the application, LSA will visit the site and prepare the wetland delineation map (including mapping additional emergent wetland vegetation in the pond) and a report documenting the findings. LSA will submit the delineation map with the permit application. This task does not include a site verification meeting with the USACE.

Task 3: Prepare California Department of Fish and Wildlife Lake or Streambed Alternation Agreement Application
LSA will prepare a CDFW Lake or Streambed Alternation Agreement (LSAA) application on behalf of the City. The application will be submitted via CDFW’s Environmental Permit Information Management System (EPIMS) online portal. A processing fee is required to be submitted with the application. The application fee will be paid by the City and is not included in this budget.

Task 4: Prepare Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Certification Application LSA will prepare a Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Water Quality Certification application for submittal to the RWQCB. LSA will schedule and participate in a pre-filing meeting with RWQCB, which needs to be requested at least 30 days prior to the submittal of the permit application. A processing fee is required to be submitted with the application. The application fee will be paid by the City and is not included in this budget.

Task 5: Prepare Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
If required by the regulatory agencies, LSA will prepare a Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for submittal to RWQCB.

Task 6: Project Management, Agency Permit Coordination, and Meetings LSA will attend one meeting with City staff and will attend up to two field meetings with applicable regulatory agency staff. LSA will keep the City apprised of the status of the various permit applications. This proposal assumes no more than 40 hours of the project manager’s time.

LSA will coordinate with Balance and Terraphase regarding their respective tasks. This proposal assumes no more than 40 hours of the project manager’s time for coordination with Balance and Terraphase.

BALANCE HYDROLOGIC TASKS
Work Plan
Balance’s work plan consists of first producing design documents required for submittal to the USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB. These permitting documents, when approved, will serve as the basis to produce construction documents in the second phase of work. 130
Task 1. Bathymetric Data Collection and Processing
Using RTK DGPS and sonar, Balance will perform a bathymetric survey of the existing conditions at the pond. The data will be integrated with ground-based survey data and together with both data collected in 2019 and Contra Costa County LiDAR, will serve as the existing topography and starting point for pond dredging plans. All effort will be made to adjust the vertical datum of collected data to the 1980 Design Drawings for the pond. Time under this task also includes setting a minimum of three local benchmarks to aid in future efforts to tie into the project datum.

Task 2. Permitting Document Production
Based on the data collected and processed under Task 1, Balance will update the dredging plans for the pond. This task includes not only the permit document component, but an update to the project quantities and opinion of probable costs. Balance understands that the intention continues to be to return the pond grades to as close to originally constructed conditions as possible. A notable exception to this is where emergent vegetation must be protected for regulatory reasons, and Balance has included time in this task to adjust the design based on newly collected data in this regard.

Task 3. Project Management
Work under this task includes producing construction documents incorporating comments raised during the permitting document production. Balance has allotted time under this task for two submittals: one 90 percent Plan Set, and one final, stamped Plan Set for use by the City in soliciting contractor bids. Balance assumes that there will be minor changes based on City and/or regulatory review for each submittal, but that these comments will not necessitate a change in the overall approach to the design. Estimates of probable cost will be included with each submittal for City review and comment. Additional assumptions are as follows:
• Balance will draft the revegetation plan, but any design work will be completed by others. • Any irrigation plan (if required) will be designed by others. • If a SWPPP is required, the City will contract for that work separately. • All required technical specifications will be in the form of notes on the Construction Documents.

No technical specifications outside the Drawings will be required. Balance will not be responsible for compiling Division 1 specifications, if required by the City for bidding and contracting.
• Bid support and Construction observation services are not included in this proposal. Balance assumes that the level of effort required during these phases will be clearer after further design work and that the City may choose to ask us for an additional proposal at that time.

Task 4. Project Management
Balance has included a modest number of hours for general meetings, document preparation, and invoicing.
131

TERRAPHASE TASKS
The City is planning to remove excess accumulated sediment from Refugio Valley Pond in the fall of 2025 by means of dewatering and excavation. It is the preference of the City that excavated sediment may be deposited and spread out in an open space area as cost-cutting measure. For planning purposes, the City is seeking to characterize the estimated 6,300 cubic yards (CY) of sediment prior to dewatering and excavation. Dewatering and excavation activities are to be performed by a contractor.

Task 1: Pre-Field Tasks
A work plan will be prepared to identify proposed sample locations, describe sample collection and handling procedures, and develop appropriate data screening criteria for the desired land use.

Following acceptance of the work plan by LSA, Terraphase will complete the following tasks:
• Schedule staff and sub-contractors (analytical laboratory) • Prepare a Job Hazard Analysis (JHA)
• Obtain sample collection equipment and materials
Task 2: Field Sampling and Laboratory Analysis
Relevant guidance suggests analysis of 13 to 14 samples is appropriate to characterize the estimated 6,300 CY of sediment for either placement as fill or offsite disposal. This quantity of samples is based on the following:
• DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet (12 samples for first 5,000 CY + 1 sample per each additional 1,000 CY)
• Typical landfill acceptance criteria (1 sample per 500 CY) The planned location for placement of the sediments is not a DTSC-regulated site and disposal of the material at a landfill is not anticipated. Therefore, Terraphase proposes the following value-focused approach:

1. Sediment samples will be collected from 16 discrete locations by means of either an Ekman dredge or 2-inch diameter sampling tube. The samples will be placed in laboratory-supplied glass jars, labeled, and packed in a cooler with ice for transport to the analytical laboratory under chain-of-custody protocols.

2. The analytical laboratory will prepare four composite samples using aliquots of the discrete samples for analysis. (e.g. discrete samples 1 through 4 are combined into composite 1, discrete samples 5 through 8 are combined into composite 2, etc.).

3. Chemical analysis will be conducted on the four composited samples. While not anticipated, should offsite disposal be necessary, the remaining volume of the 16 discrete samples may be analyzed to provide sufficient analytical data for landfill acceptance without the need to collect additional samples.

132
Composite samples will be analyzed for the following reported on a dry weight basis:
• Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by EPA Method 8260B - Samples for 8260B analysis will not be composited. • Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) and motor oil (TPH-mo) by EPA Method 8015 Modified.
• Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8270D. • Title 22 Metals by EPA Method 6010B/7471A.
• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) using EPA Method 8082A. • Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) using EPA Method 8270 SIM. • Pesticides using EPA Method 8081B.
• Total organic carbon (TOC) using Standard Method 5310B. • Moisture content using ASTM D2216.

Task 3: Data Summary
Following receipt of analytical results, Terraphase will prepare a table to summarize the analytical results. The table will screen the data against criteria developed in the work plan or California waste criteria to assist the City with project planning.

SPECIFICATIONS
LSA Assumptions
• This proposal includes one round of revisions due to comments from the City and regulatory agencies.
• This proposal assumes that no wetland verification visit with the USACE will be required. • This proposal assumes no more than 40 hours of meetings and consultation with the regulatory agency representatives.

Terraphase Assumptions
• Access to the work area will be provided during regular work hours and required access will be facilitated by City.
• Laboratory costs included in this proposal assume four composite samples will be analyzed. If a larger volume of sediment is encountered, additional samples may be required at the frequency previously indicated. If additional samples are required, Terraphase will notify LSA for approval of the additional costs prior to collection and analysis. • Laboratory analysis costs included in this proposal assume a 5-day standard turnaround time, from the date the samples are received by the laboratory (generally the day after sampling). If a shorter turnaround time is requested, additional fees will be incurred. 133
• Soil is assumed to be non-hazardous waste. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and Waste Extraction Test (WET) procedures may be required if the analytical results chemical constituents are above certain thresholds. Costs for these additional analyses are not included.

If the results indicate that these analyses are required, Terraphase will notify LSA for approval of these additional analytical costs prior to authorizing the laboratory to conduct the analyses. • Geotechnical properties are not included in the scope of this proposal. Building over the sediment may be difficult, geotechnical data including sieve analysis and hydrometer testing are recommended to support characterize the sediment for final placement as fill. If the City and LSA decide geotechnical testing is warranted, Terraphase can provide an estimated cost to conduct the additional sampling for LSA approval prior to adding the analysis. • Work will be performed in Level D personal protective equipment.

BUDGET AND TERMS
LSA, Balance, and Terraphase will provide these services on an hourly rate basis consistent with the attached billing rates and cost tables. We estimate a budget of an amount not to exceed $132,101.

This amount consists of $47,900 for LSA’s tasks (Task 1: 4,650; Task 2: $9,060; Task 3: $5,870; Task 4:
$9,410; Task 5: $2,910; Task 6: $16,000), $62,481 for Balance Hydrologics’ tasks (Task 1: $12,670; Task 2: $13,160; Task 3: $32,420; Task 4: $3,860; $371 expenses), and $21,720 for Terraphase’s tasks (Task 1: $4,560; Task 2: $15,350; Task 3: $1,810 [The fee for the laboratory analysis is included in the costs.), including reimbursable expenses, will be sufficient to perform the tasks described in the Scope of Services. The estimated budget will not be exceeded without specific authorization.

Balance has also included an optional 10 percent contingency in their attached proposal.

We look forward to continuing our assistance to the City with this project. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
LSA Associates, Inc.

Dan Sidle
Associate/Senior Biologist

Attachment: LSA Hourly Billing Rates
LSA Budget Spreadsheet
Balance Hydrologics Proposal (dated September 10, 2024) Terraphase Proposal (dated August 8, 2024)
Terraphase Proposal Time and Materials Cost Estimate
134
HOURLY BILLING RATES EFFECTIVE MAY 2024
Job Classification
Hourly Rate
Range1,2 Environmental
Planning Transportation Air/Noise
Cultural/
Paleontological
Resources
Biology GIS
Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal $190–$400 Associate Associate Associate Associate Associate Associate $150–$250 Senior Planner
Senior
Transportation
Planner/Engineer
Senior Air Quality/
Noise Specialist/
Noise Engineer
Senior Archaeologist/
Architectural Historian/
Paleontologist
Senior Biologist/
Botanist/Wildlife
Biologist/Ecologist/
Soil Scientist/
Herpetologist/Arborist
Senior GIS
Specialist $130–$235
Planner Transportation
Planner/Engineer
Air Quality/
Noise Specialist/
Noise Engineer/
Climate Change
Specialist
Archaeologist/
Architectural Historian/
Paleontologist
Biologist/Botanist/
Wildlife Biologist/
Ecologist/Soil Scientist/
Herpetologist/Arborist
GIS
Specialist $100–$165
Assistant
Planner
Assistant
Transportation
Planner/Engineer
Air Quality/
Noise Analyst
Field Archaeologist/
Paleontologist
Assistant Biologist/
Botanist/Wildlife
Biologist/Ecologist/
Soil Scientist/
Herpetologist/Arborist
Assistant
GIS
Specialist
$85–$130
Office Services
Marketing $110–$185
Office Assistant $110–$145
Project Accountant $110–$135
Document Management/Technical Editing/Graphics $115–$160 1 The hourly rate for work involving actual expenses in court (e.g., giving depositions or similar expert testimony) will be bi lled at $400 per hour regardless of job classifications.
2 Hourly rates are subject to review at least annually and may be adjusted to reflect changing labor costs at LSA’s discretion .

LSA IN-HOUSE DIRECT COSTS EFFECTIVE MAY 20241
Description Unit Cost Description Unit Cost
Reproduction (8.5 x 11) B/W $0.07 per page Total Station Surveying Instrument $50.00 per day Reproduction (8.5 x 11) Color $0.40 per page Level (Laser or Optical) $25.00 per day Reproduction (11 x 17) B/W $0.10 per page Laser Rangefinder $25.00 per day Reproduction (11 x 17) Color $0.75 per page Sound Meter $75.00 per day CD Production $5.00 per CD Sound Meter with Velocity Transducer $85.00 per day USB Flash Drive $5.00 per drive Aerial Photo Cost
Plotting $3.75 per sq ft GPS Unit $75.00 per day
Aerial Drone $200.00 per day Water Quality Meter $25.00 per day Mileage On-Road Current federal rate Night Vision Goggles $50.00 per unit per night Mileage Off-Road Current federal rate Wildlife Camera $25.00 per day 1 Direct costs shall be reimbursed at cost plus 10 percent.

135
Refugio Valley Pond Dredging Budget Breakdown LSA
9/11/2024
100% Year 1 $270 $200 $150 $180 $125 $170
Phase 01 Biological Assessment

1.1 Field Survey 2.00 0.25 2.25 $445.00

1.2 Biological Assessment and Bio Supplement 1.00 6.00 16.00 4.00 27.00 $4,150.00

1.00 8.00 0.00 0.25 16.00 4.00 29.25 $4,595.00
Phase 02 USACE Permit and Jurisdictinal Delineation

2.1 Jurisdictional Delineation Survey 1.00 8.00 0.25 9.25 $1,445.00

2.2 Jurisdictional Delineation Figure 1.00 1.00 8.00 8.00 18.00 $3,030.00

2.3 USACE Permit Application 1.00 2.00 31.00 34.00 $4,545.00

2.00 4.00 16.00 0.25 31.00 8.00 61.25 $9,020.00
Phase 03 CDFW Permit

3.1 CDFW Permit Application 1.00 8.00 32.00 41.00 $5,870.00

1.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 0.00 41.00 $5,870.00
Phase 04 RWQCB Permit

4.1 RWQCB Permit Application 1.00 16.00 32.00 2.00 51.00 $7,810.00

4.2 Pre-filing Meeting 8.00 8.00 $1,600.00

1.00 24.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 2.00 59.00 $9,410.00
Phase 05 Mitigation and Monitoring Plan

5.1 Mitigation and Monitoring Pan 1.00 4.00 12.00 2.00 19.00 $2,910.00

1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.00 19.00 $2,910.00
Phase 06 Meetings

6.1 Meetings and Coordination 40.00 40.00 $8,000.00

6.2 Coordination with Balance and Terraphase 40.00 40.00 $8,000.00

0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 $16,000.00
Mileage $45.69
Tolls $15.40
$61.09
$47,866.09
Phase 01 Biological Assessment Subtotal
Subtotal Reimbursable Expenses
Reimbursable Expenses
Total
Principal in Charge
(Dobberteen)
Project Manager
(Sidle)
Senior Biologist
(Schmidt)
Associate Biologist
(Zantzinger)
Technical Specialist
(Various)
GIS (Gallaugher) Total LSA Fees
Phase 05 Mitigation and Monitoring Plan Subtotal
Total LSA Hours
Phase 06 Meetings Subtotal
Phase 02 USACE Permit and Jurisdictinal Delineation Subtotal Phase 03 CDFW Permit Subtotal
Phase 04 RWQCB Permit Subtotal
136
Septemb
er 10, 2024
Mr. Dan
Sidle
LSA
157 Park Place
Point Richmond, California 94801
Via email: [email protected]
RE: Scope o
f Work for Assistance with Preparation of Sediment Dredging Plans for the Refugio Valley Park Pond, City of Hercules
Dear Dan Sidle,
We would li
ke to begin by thanking you for requesting a scope of work from Balance Hydrologics (“Balance”) to provide additional assistance for the Sediment Dredging Project planned for Refugio Valley Park in the City of Hercules (“City”). We understand that some elements of the project have evolved during what has been a multi-year pause in the planning, but that the City is now prepared to take the next steps and move towards construction. We are excited for the opportunity to be a part of this next phase and believe that our team can provide good value to this effort to complete the permitting process and prepare plans, specifications, and cost estimates that will guide the anticipated pond remediation work.

This letter describes the work we believe was requested during our recent meetings and in correspondence with both you and the City.

Work Plan
The broad work under this scope consists of first producing design documents required for submittal to the Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. These permitting documents, when approved, will serve as the basis for the production of construction documents in the second phase of work.

Task 1. Bathymetric data collection and processing. Using RT K DGPS and sonar, we will perform a
bathymetric survey of the existing conditions at the pond. The data will be integrated with ground-based survey data and together with data previously collected in 2019 and off-the-shelf Contra Costa County LiDAR, will serve as the existing topography and starting point for pond dredging plans. All effort will be made to adjust the vertical datum of collected data to the 1980 Design Drawings for the pond. Time under this task also includes setting a minimum of three local benchmarks to aid in future efforts to tie into the project datum.
137
Task 2. Permitting document production. Based on the data collected and processed under Task 1, Balance will update the dredging plans for the pond. This task includes not only the permit document component, but an update to the project quantities and opinion of probable costs. We understand that the intention continues to be to return the pond grades to as close to originally constructed conditions as possible. A notable exception to this is where emergent vegetation must be protected for regulatory reasons, and we have included time in this task to adjust the design based on newly collected data in this regard.

Task 3. Construction document production. Work unde
r this task includes producing construction
documents incorporating comments raised during the permitting document production. We have allotted time under this task for two submittals: one 90% Plan Set, and one final, stamped Plan Set for use by the City in soliciting contractor bids. We assume that there will be minor changes based on City and / or regulatory review for each submittal, but that these comments will not necessitate a change in the overall approach to the design. Estimates of probable cost will be included with each submittal for City review and comment. Additional assumptions are as follows:

Balance Hydrologics will draft the revegetation plan but any design work will be done by others.

Any irri
gation plan (if required) will be designed by others.

If a SWPPP is required, the City will contract for that work separately.

All required technical specifications will be in the form of notes on the Construction Documents. No technical specifications outside the Drawings will be required. Balance will not be responsible for compiling Division 1 specifications, if required by the City for bidding and contracting.

Bid support and Construction observation services are not included in this proposal. We assume that the level of effort required during these phases will be more clear after further design work and that the City may choose to ask us for an additional proposal at that time.

Task 4. Project management. We have
included a modest number of hours for general meetings, document preparation, and invoicing.

Schedule and Budget
The anti
cipated budget for this phase of work is summarized in the enclosed budget table. We suggest billing on a time and materials basis not to exceed this value without your prior authorization.

We are prepared to begin bathymetric data collection within 3 weeks of receiving your written authorization to proceed.
138
Closing
Thank you again for requesting the above work plan. We welcome the opportunity to apply our experience to this project.

Please do not hesitate to contact Balance if you have any questions or comments related to this scope or the work approach suggested.

Sincerely,

BALANCE
HYDROLOGICS, Inc.

Dana Jepsen
Designer / Hydrologist
Edward D. Ballman, P.E.

Principal Engineer
Enclos
ures: Table 1: Anticipated Staff Hours by Task
Table 2: Estimated Costs
139
Task Number and Description
Principal
Project
Professional
Sr. Staff
Professional
Staff
Professional

GIS/CADD
Senior Analyst
Sr. Proj Admin
Report Specialist
Labor Costs For
Task
Hourly Rate $245 $195 $190 $170 $155 $145 $105
2 12 36 24 $12,670.00
4 8 12 54 2 $13,160.00
8 32 24 124 2 6 $32,420.00
2 10 2 6 2 $3,860.00
16 62 74 202 8 10
Task 1. Bathymetric data collection and processing
Task 2. Permitting document production
Task 3. Construction document production
Task 4. Communications and project management
Subtotal Hours
Total Hours
Notes: TOTAL LABOR $62,110.00
Expenses (mileage, bathymetric survey equipment) $370.96 GRAND TOTAL $62,480.96
Table 1. Anticipated Staff Hours by Task
224095 Refugio Valley Park Sediment Removal
224095 Budget Table 2024-09-10, Table 1, 9/10/2024 ©2023-24 Balance Hydrologics, Inc. 140
Professional Fees Rate Hours Allocation
Sr. Principal $270 0 $0.00
Principal $245 16 $3,920.00
Senior Professional $210 0 $0.00
Project Professional $195 62 $12,090.00
Senior Staff Professional $190 0 $0.00
Staff Professional $170 74 $12,580.00
Assistant Professional $155 0 $0.00
Junior Professional $140 0 $0.00
GIS/CADD Senior Analyst $155 202 $31,310.00
GIS/CADD Analyst $145 0 $0.00
Senior Project Administrator $145 8 $1,160.00
Senior Report Specialist $120 0 $0.00
Report Specialist $105 10 $1,050.00
Hydrologic Technician $105 0 $0.00
Labor Subtotal (Table 1) $62,110.00
Expenses
Direct Expenses
Mileage 168 miles @ $0.72 $120.96
Mileage, 4-Wheel Drive* miles @ $0.75 $0.00
Vehicle Rental $0.00
Equipment Costs (bathymetric survey) $250.00
Per Diems @ $0.00
Reimbursable Costs
Other Travel, Subsistence trips @ $0.00
Express Mail, Deliveries $0.00
Maps and Aerial Photos $0.00
Outside Copying, Blueprint $0.00
Outside Consultants $0.00
Analytical Laboratory Fees $0.00
Materials and Supplies $0.00
Permits, Licenses or Agency Inspection fees client responsibility $0.00 Printing+
$0.00
Other $0.00
Expenses Subtotal $370.96
ESTIMATED TOTAL $62,480.96
Notes TOTAL w/ CONTINGENCY $68,729.06
* 4WD rates apply only if required by site conditions. See Balance policy re 4WD. +Plotting costs vary according to complexity of design
Project-related expenses will be billed at cost plus 10%; including work by outside consultants and analytical or testing laboratories. 224095 Refugio Valley Park Sediment Removal
Table 2. Estimated Costs
224095 Budget Table 2024-09-10, Table 2, 9/10/2024 ©2023-24 Balance Hydrologics, Inc. 141
August 8, 2024
Mr. Dan Sidle
LSA Associates, Inc.
157 Park Place
Point Richmond, California 94801
sent via email to [email protected]
Subject: Proposed Sampling and Analysis of Refugio Valley Pond Sediments for Reuse or Disposal Dear Mr. Sidle:

Terraphase Engineering Inc. (Terraphase) has prepared this proposal at the request of LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) to perform sampling and analysis of sediment to be excavated from Refugio Valley Pond, Hercules, for environmental characterization of the material. We understand that the City of Hercules (the City) is evaluating options for reuse of the sediment but that disposal at a landfill may be warranted dependent on the characterization.

Scope of Work
Refugio Valley Pond is a concrete lined pond located southeast of the intersection of Refugio Valley Road and Sycamore Avenue, Hercules, California. The City is planning to remove excess accumulated sediment from Refugio Valley Pond in the fall of 2025 by means of dewatering and excavation. It is the preference of the City that excavated sediment may be reused as fill at a local Parks and Recreation facility. For planning purposes, the City is seeking to characterize the estimated 6,300 cubic yards (CY) of sediment prior to dewatering and excavation.

Dewatering and excavation activities are to be performed by Balance Hydrologics, Inc. (Balance).

Task 1: Pre-Field Tasks
Prior to performing the sediment sampling, Terraphase will coordinate with LSA and Balance to identify and resolve any logistical challenges (e.g., site access, scheduling).

A work plan will be prepared to identify proposed sample locations, provide methods to access the sample locations, describe sample collection and handling procedures, and develop appropriate data screening criteria for the desired land use. Following acceptance of the work plan by LSA, Terraphase will complete the following tasks:
• Schedule staff and sub-contractors (analytical laboratory); • Prepare a Job Hazard Analysis (JHA);
• Obtain sample collection equipment and materials.

Task 2: Field Sampling and Laboratory Analysis
Relevant guidance suggests analysis of 13 to 14 samples is appropriate to characterize the estimated 6,300 CY of sediment for either placement as fill or offsite disposal. This quantity of samples is based on the following:
• DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet (12 samples for first 5,000 CY + 1 sample per each additional 1,000 CY)
• Typical landfill acceptance criteria (1 sample per 500 CY) 142
The planned location for placement of the sediments is not a DTSC-regulated site and disposal of the material at a landfill is not anticipated. Therefore, Terraphase proposes the following value-focused approach:

1. Sediment samples will be collected from 16 discrete locations by means of either an Ekman dredge or similar sampling device. The samples will be placed in laboratory-supplied glass jars, labeled, and packed in a cooler with ice for transport to the analytical laboratory under chain-of-custody protocols.

2. The analytical laboratory will prepare four composite samples using aliquots of the discrete samples for analysis. (e.g. discrete samples 1 through 4 are combined into composite 1, discrete samples 5 through 8 are combined into composite 2, etc.)

3. Chemical analysis will be conducted on the four composited samples. While not anticipated, should offsite disposal be necessary, the remaining volume of the 16 discrete samples may be analyzed to provide sufficient analytical data for landfill acceptance without the need to collect additional samples.

Composite samples will be analyzed for the following reported on a dry weight basis:
• Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) by EPA Method 8260B – Samples for 8260B analysis will not be composited • Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) and motor oil (TPH-mo) by EPA Method 8015 Modified • Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8270D • Title 22 Metals by EPA Method 6010B/7471A
• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) using EPA Method 8082A • Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) using EPA Method 8270 SIM • Pesticides using EPA Method 8081B
• Total organic carbon (TOC) using Standard Method 5310B • Moisture content using ASTM D2216
Task 3: Data Summary
Following receipt of analytical results, Terraphase will prepare a table to summarize the analytical results. The table will screen the data against criteria developed in the work plan or California waste criteria to assist the City with project planning.

Assumptions
Terraphase has made the following assumptions in preparing this cost estimate:
• Access to the work area will be provided during regular work hours. • Laboratory costs included in this proposal assume four composite samples will be analyzed. If a larger volume of sediment is encountered, additional samples may be required at the frequency previously indicated. If additional samples are required, Terraphase will notify LSA for approval of the additional costs prior to collection and analysis.
• Laboratory analysis costs included in this proposal assume a 5-day standard turnaround time, from the date the samples are received by the laboratory (generally the day after sampling). If a shorter turnaround time is requested, additional fees will be incurred.
143
• Soil is assumed to be non‐hazardous waste. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and Waste Extraction Test (WET) procedures may be required if the analytical results chemical constituents are above certain thresholds. Costs for these additional analyses are not included. If the results indicate that these analyses are required, Terraphase will notify LSA for approval of these additional analytical costs prior to authorizing the laboratory to conduct the analyses.
• Geotechnical properties are not included in the scope of this proposal. Building over the sediment may be difficult, geotechnical data including sieve analysis and hydrometer testing are recommended to support characterize the sediment for final placement as fill. If the City and LSA decide geotechnical testing is warranted, Terraphase can provide an estimated cost to conduct the additional sampling for LSA approval prior to adding the analysis.
• Work will be performed in Level D personal protective equipment.

Cost Estimate
Terraphase will perform these activities on a time and materials basis as requested by LSA. The following cost estimate is summarized by Task and provides a Total Request amount:

Task 1: Pre-Field Tasks $ 4,560
Task 2: Field Sampling and Laboratory Analysis $ 15,350 Task 3: Data Summary Table $ 1,810
Total $ 21,720
Terraphase will not exceed this authorized amount without prior written approval of LSA. We will perform the work under mutually agreeable terms between Terraphase and LSA and the attached 2024 standard schedule of charges.

Closing
Terraphase is grateful for the opportunity to offer our services on this project. If you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal, please contact Chris Jones at 510-645-1850 x48.

Sincerely,
for Terraphase Engineering Inc.

Chris Jones, PE (C89316)
Associate Engineer
144

Acceptance of Proposal
The cost, specifications, and conditions outlined herein are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. Terraphase is authorized to proceed with the work, as specified.

This proposal is hereby accepted by a duly authorized representative of the Client to whom it is addressed:

Signature: Date:

Printed Name:

Title:

145

2024 Standard Schedule of Charges

Labor Classification Hourly Rate
Senior Principal $303
Principal Engineer/Scientist $286
Senior Associate Engineer/Scientist $266
Associate Engineer/Scientist $250
Senior Project Engineer/Scientist $235
Project Engineer/Scientist $219
Senior Staff 2 Engineer/Scientist $202
Senior Staff 1 Engineer/Scientist
Staff 2 Engineer/Scientist
$183
$164
Staff 1 Engineer/Scientist $144
Senior Technician
Technician 3
Technician 2
$149
$129
$109
Technician 1 $91
Senior Editor/Senior Project Coordinator
Editor 2/Project Coordinator 2/Accountant 2
Editor 1/Project Coordinator 1/Accountant 1
$158
$140
$117
Administrator/Project Assistant/Billing Specialist $98

Labor Charges
All time will be recorded and charged to nearest 0.1 hour. Expert testimony at trials, hearings and depositions will be billed at 150% of the standard hourly rate. For each day when testimony is provided, a minimum of 8 hours will be billed. Preparatory time will be billed at standard rates.

Expenses
Subcontractor fees and other direct costs, such as air travel, project supplies and rental equipment, etc. will be itemized and billed at our cost plus a fifteen percent handling charge. Vehicle mileage when itemized is billed at the standard government rate in effect at the time of travel (www.gsa.gov/mileage).

Payment
Payment is to be made to Terraphase Engineering Inc. as follows:

Check Payments: Wire/ACH Payments:

Terraphase Engineering Inc.

P.O. Box 102399
Pasadena, CA 91189-2399
Terraphase Engineering Inc.

JPMorgan Chase Bank
Account Number 217693099
Routing Number 322271627
Payment is due within 30 days of receipt of invoice. A service charge of 1.5% per month or the allowable legal rate may be charged on amounts that are past due for more than 30 days.

Annual Escalation
Rates are subject to revision by annual calendar year escalation in January. Rates on invoices will reflect rates in effect at time of invoicing.

146
Table 1 - Time and Materials Cost Estimate
LSA Associates
Refugio Valley Park Pond Sediment Charaterization
Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost
Senior Principal Hour 303.00$ 2 606$ -$ 1 303$ -$ 3 909$ Principal Hour 286.00$ 2 572$ -$ -$ -$ 2 572$ Senior Associate Hour 266.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0 -$ Associate Hour 250.00$ 4 1,000$ 2 500$ 2 500$ -$ 8 2,000$ Senior Project Hour 235.00$ 8 1,880$ -$ 2 470$ -$ 10 2,350$ Project Hour 219.00$ -$ -$ 2 438$ -$ 2 438$
Senior Staff 2 Hour 202.00$ 2 404$ 20 4,040$ -$ -$ 22 4,444$ Senior Staff 1 Hour 183.00$ -$ 20 3,660$ -$ -$ 20 3,660$ Staff 2 Hour 164.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0 -$
Staff 1 Hour 144.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0 -$
Administrator/Project Assistant/Billing Specialist Hour 98.00$ 1 98$ 1 98$ 1 98$ -$ 3 294$ Total Terraphase Labor 4,560$ 8,298$ 1,809$ -$ 14,667$ Enthalpy - Composite Fee (4 -> 1) each 30.00$ -$ 5 150$ -$ -$ 5 150$ Enthalpy - EPA 8015B TPH-d + TPH-o each 60.00$ -$ 5 300$ -$ -$ 5 300$ Enthalpy - EPA 8081 Pesticides each 100.00$ -$ 5 500$ -$ -$ 5 500$ Enthalpy - EPA 8082 PCBs each 80.00$ -$ 5 400$ -$ -$ 5 400$ Enthalpy - EPA 8260 TPH-gro each 55.00$ -$ 5 275$ -$ -$ 5 275$ Enthalpy - EPA 8260 Volatile Organics each 95.00$ -$ 7 665$ -$ -$ 7 665$ Enthalpy - EPA 8270 SIM PAHs each 140.00$ -$ 5 700$ -$ -$ 5 700$ Enthalpy - EPA 8270 SVOCs each 175.00$ -$ 5 875$ -$ -$ 5 875$ Enthalpy - EPA 9060 TOC each 75.00$ -$ 5 375$ -$ -$ 5 375$ Enthalpy - ASTM D2216 each 20.00$ -$ 5 100$ -$ -$ 5 100$ Enthalpy - Container Disposal Fee each 8.00$ -$ 16 128$ -$ -$ 16 128$ Enthalpy - Terra Core Kit each 20.00$ -$ 5 100$ -$ -$ 5 100$ Pine AMS Dredge Soil Sampler day 50.00$ -$ 2 100$ -$ -$ 2 100$ Total Subcontractor Costs -$ 4,668$ -$ -$ 4,668$
EXAMPLE ROW - Mailing event 200.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0 -$ Total Other Direct Costs -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Direct Cost Handling 15% -$ 700$ -$ -$ 700$
Total Direct Costs -$ 5,368$ -$ -$ 5,368$
Truck/Vehicle (day) Day 196.00$ -$ 4 784$ -$ -$ 4 784$ IPad and Electronic Field Data (day) Day 38.00$ -$ 2 76$ -$ -$ 2 76$ Daily Consumables (includes gloves, ziplock bags and
trash bags) Each 23.00$ -$ 2 46$ -$ -$ 2 46$
Field Health and Safety and Decon Supplies (daily
fee) Day 32.00$ -$ 4 128$ -$ -$ 4 128$
Terraphase Raft Day 279.00$ -$ 2 558$ -$ -$ 2 558$ Rope - 100ft length Roll 23.00$ -$ 4 92$ -$ -$ 4 92$ Total Terraphase Equipment/Supplies (ERS) -$ 1,684$ -$ -$ 1,684$ Total Estimated Project Unit Costs 4,560$ 15,350$ 1,809$ -$ 21,719$ Notes:

Category Units
2024
Standard
Rate
Labor
Direct Costs
Subcontractor
Other Direct Costs
Terraphase Equipment/Supplies (ERS)
Task 2: Field
Sampling and
Laboratory
Task 3: Data
Summary TOTALSTask 1: Pre-Field
Tasks Task 4:

Terraphase Engineering Inc. Page 1 of 1
147
DIS

CUSSION AND/OR ACTION

AGENDA ITEM

2. 22-995
148

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of October 22, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Timothy Rood, AICP, Community Development Director Christopher Roke, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: City-Sponsored Event Policy Amendments
RECOMMENDATION ACTION:

Approve a resolution amending the City-Sponsored Event Policy to allow the City Manager to fully or partially waive facility rental fees as well as permit fees as an in-kind contribution to community events that the City chooses to co-sponsor with City - recognized nonprofit groups.

BACKGROUND:

Since approximately 2007, the City has recognized and supported community -based nonprofit organizations that improve and enhance the quality of life for the residents of Hercules through the City’s Nonprofit Group Recognition Program . Each year, the Recreation Department accepts nominations, which are reviewed and acted upon by the City’s Community and Library Services Commission. Currently there are 14 nonprofits recognized by the City (Attachment 3). City-recognized nonprofits are eligible for reduced rates on facility rentals and are eligible to use certain City facilities at certain times for business meetings.

On March 12, 2024, the City Council approved a City-Sponsored Event Policy that allows, but does not require, the City manager to approve partial or full reductions in permitting fees, such as fees for Temporary Use Permits, for community events the City chooses to co-sponsor with City-recognized nonprofits. The policy provides that co-sponsored events must be nonpartisan, nonsectarian and open to the entire Hercules community. However, 22-995
149
the policy does not currently allow the City Manager to waive or reduce facility rental fees below the already-reduced rates charged to City-recognized nonprofits.

Indoor and outdoor events held at City facilities such as Refugio Valley Park, the Hercules Library or the Community Swim Center are subject to facility rental fees but do not require temporary use permits unless 100 or more attendees are anticipated. Thus, under the current policy, City co-sponsorship does not provide any financial benefit to the organizers of these smaller events.

ANALYSIS:

To provide an increased benefit to the sponsors of City -cosponsored events, s taff requests that the Council amend the City -Sponsored Event Policy to allow the City Manager at his or her discretion to fully or partially waive facility rental fees, in addition to permit fees.

Under the proposed amended policy (Attachment 2), City-recognized nonprofits applying for Special Event permits and/or facility rentals could request a fee waiver or reduction as well as a rental facility fee reduction at the time of application. The City Manager would determine within ten business days whether the City wished to co-sponsor the event and the extent of the fee reductions or waivers.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed policy would reduce the facility rental fees accruing to the General Fun d.

The amount of the reduction would depend on the number of events co -sponsored with City-recognized nonprofits, as well as the extent of the fee reductions or waivers granted by the City Manager.

In 2023, City-recognized nonprofits rented City facilities for four events that included Bottles and Bites, Crab Feed, Career Fair, and Breakfast with Santa. The current facility rental fees for these events are estimated at $4,500, all or part of which could be contributed in kind by the City under the proposed policy.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution Amending the City-Sponsored Event Policy

2. Proposed Amended City-Sponsored Event Policy

3. City-Recognized Nonprofit Groups

150
RESOLUTION NO. 24-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERCULES AMENDING

THE CITY-SPONSORED EVENT POLICY TO ALLOW FOR THE REDUCTION OF

FACILITY RENTAL FEES AS AN IN -KIND CONTRIBUTION FOR EVENTS HELD BY

CITY-RECOGNIZED NON-PROFITS THAT ARE CO-SPONSORED BY THE CITY

WHEREAS, the City of Hercules recognizes and supports community -based nonprofit organizations that improve and enhance the quality of life for the residents of Hercules through the City’s Nonprofit Recognition Program; and

WHEREAS, the City of Hercules values the contribution of City -recognized nonprofit organizations to community life, including sponsorship of community events; and

WHEREAS, the City often participates in the planning and execution of community events sponsored by City-recognized nonprofit organizations; and

WHEREAS, in March 2024 the City Council approved a City -Sponsored Event Policy authorizing the City Manager to reduce or waive permit fees for community events that the City chooses to co-sponsors with City-recognized nonprofit groups, and

WHEREAS, the City may also wish to contribute facility rental fees in kind as a n additional contribution to events it cosponsors with City -recognized nonprofit organizations.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules that the amended City-Sponsored Event Policy for the City of Hercules hereto attached is approved and shall guide City sponsorship of community events in the City.

151
The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopt ed at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the 22nd day of October, 2024 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Dan Romero, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________________________
Eibleis Melendez
City Clerk

152
Council Policy on City-Sponsored Events
(Proposed Amendments shown in bold underline)

PURPOSE
To establish guidelines for: (1) City co-sponsorship of community events and (2) in-kind contribution of City permit fees and facility rental fees to City co-sponsored events.

POLICY
It is the policy of the City of Hercules that community events sponsored by City- recognized nonprofit organizations may be co-sponsored by the City at the sole discretion of the City Manager.

In order to establish a policy with respect to the types of events the City may wish to co- sponsor and the City’s contribution to such events, the following standards should be followed.

The City Manager is responsible for ensuring the proper execution of this policy.

STANDARDS

A. City Co-Sponsorship of Certain Community Events

1. At the discretion of the City Manager or his or her designee, the City may choose to co-sponsor certain community events that are organized by City-recognized nonprofit organizations.

2. “City-recognized nonprofit organizations” shall refer to organizations recognized by the City through its Nonprofit Group Recognition Program, which is administered by the Recreation Department and reviewed annually by the Community & Library Services Commission.

3. “Co-sponsored events” shall refer to public events organized by City-recognized nonprofit organizations that the City Manager elects to co-sponsor.

4. Co-sponsored events shall be open to the entire Hercules community and shall be nonpartisan and nonsectarian.

5. Publicity for co-sponsored events, such as event registration webpages, marketing communications, banners, and signs, shall include the City’s name and/or logo on an equal basis with those of other sponsors. 153

6. Event organizers must apply for all required facility rentals through the Parks and Recreation Department, Special Event Temporary Use Permits through the City’s Community Development Department and/or Encroachment Permits through the City’s Public Works Department. Requests for City co-sponsorship, if desired, shall be included as part of the permit application(s).

7. The City Manager shall determine, within ten (10) business days of the City’s receipt of an application, whether the City wishes to co-sponsor the event. Such determinations shall apply only to the event date(s) listed on the permit or facility rental application and shall not apply to subsequent events not listed on the application.

B. In-Kind Contribution of City Permit Fees for Co-Sponsored Events

1. At the sole discretion of the City Manager or his or her designee, the City may choose to make an in-kind contribution of a portion or all of the required permit fees and/or facility rental fees for co-sponsored events.

154
ATTACHMENT 3

2024 City-Recognized Nonprofit Groups

• Bayfront Chamber of Commerce
• Boy Scout Troop 76
• Chinese Association of Hercules
• Friends of the Hercules Library
• Friends of the Hercules Senior Center
• Hercules Community Garden
• Hercules Community Library Foundation
• Hercules Democratic Club
• Hercules Education Foundation
• Hercules Historical Society
• Hercules Senior Citizens Club
• Hercules Sister City Association
• Rotary Club of Hercules
• West Contra Costa Youth Soccer League

155
DIS

CUSSION AND/OR ACTION

AGENDA ITEM

3. 22-998
156

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of October 22, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Christopher Roke, Parks and Recreation Director SUBJECT: Discussion on Inclusive Recreation Programming for Individuals with Disabilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive a report on a potential inclusive event designed to serve individuals with disabilities, discuss the subject, and provide additional feedback.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council requested that staff explore and propose an event or initiative to promote accessibility and social inclusion among individuals with disabilities for Council consideration. Staff has identified a cooperative program known as Quad -City, which includes Concord, Pleasant Hill, Martinez, and Walnut Creek. Together, Quad-City offers a monthly dance program and inclusive movie and game nights that rotate between each of the four cities (Attachments 1 and 2)
Staff has contacted the Quad -City representatives to learn more about their offerings, event costs, and staffing needs. Staff has also contacted several West County cities to gauge their interest in potentially partnering to develop a similar program along the Highway 80 corridor.

Tonight, staff will discuss this concept and seek feedback from the City Council before moving forward.
22-998
157

BACKGROUND:

The City of Hercules is home to a diverse population, with a growing need for programs that reflect and accommodate differences in physical abilities, among other things. The Parks and Recreation Department is recognizing this with the increasing number of children with special needs. This has been most apparent in our afterschool (RAP) and summer camp (Camp Dynamite) programs.

Despite making progress in recent years by adding the all-abilities swing at Refugio Valley Park, there are still gaps in programs for marginalized groups such as those with physical limitations.

ANALYSIS:

Staff has had very preliminary discussions with staff in Pinole, San Pablo, El Cerrito, Richmond and Albany to try to capture the collective spirit that the Quad -City group has achieved for over a decade.

Before staff gets too far along, staff is reporting back to City Council to confirm that such a program fits conceptually with what City Council had in mind.

Despite the value of such events, due to current staffing level d eficits, staff seeks to develop a partnership with some of our colleagues along the Highway 80 corridor to explore the viability of replicating what is already working for other agencies.

The fiscal impact to the City of Hercules for implementing inclusive programing at the time of this report is unknown. Costs would depend upon partnerships formed, staffing , and costs associated with the dances (DJ, food/drink, etc.).

Assuming the City Council agrees with th is suggestion , staff will work with th e other communities to set up a program and schedule for the number and frequency of inclusive events in the future.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this discussion. Once the City Council provides direction, staff will return with a full fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Inclusive Recreation Dances

2. Inclusive Movie and Game Night
158
159
LOCATION: Concord Senior Center
2727 Parkside Circle, Concord, CA 94519
CONTACT: 925-671-3017
June 20
August 15
October 24
December 12
LOCATION: Martinez Senior Center
818 Green Street, Martinez, CA 94553
CONTACT : 925-370-8002
May 9
July 25
September 26
November 21
Drop-In and pay $5 entry fee at the door!
*Caregivers/parents may enter for free
Fees include: cost of staffing, games, light refreshments

IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CITY OF CONCORD AND THE
CITY OF MARTINEZ’S RECREATION DEPARTMENTS:

THURSDAYS ONCE A MONTH, Time: 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm
JOIN US FOR A FUN-FILLED NIGHT WITH FRIENDS!JOIN US FOR A FUN-FILLED NIGHT WITH FRIENDS!

INCLUSIVE MOVIE AND GAME NIGHTSINCLUSIVE MOVIE AND GAME NIGHTS Open to all adults 18+ with disabilities
This Inclusive Recreation program is specially designed for adults ages 18 and older with disabilities, focusing on both physical and developmental disabilities. The program aims to provide a fun and engaging environment where participants can enjoy a range of activities tailored to their interests and abilities. Participants will have the opportunity to come together and enjoy a variety of entertainment options. This includes movie screenings and a selection of interactive games such as board games, card games, and digital gaming options suitable for different skill levels. Participants are welcome to bring their own favorite games to share and play with others! 160
DIS

CUSSION AND/OR ACTION

AGENDA ITEM

4. 22-996
161

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: Regular Meeting of October 22, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Dante Hall, City Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Timothy Rood, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Queen Anne House Demolition
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a resolution finding demolition of the Queen Anne house to be exempt from CEQA, authorizing its demolition, and amending the General Fund FY 2024 -25 Budget for the Public Works Department increasing its appropriation by $50,000 for testing and demolition of the structure.

BACKGROUND:

The City Council has discussed the Queen Anne extensively, including on September 27, 2016; November 9, 2016; September 12, 2017; February 26, 2019; and July 9, 2024.

Historic Designation
The disassembled Queen Anne house now located at the City’s corporation yard was built around 1905 and was identified in 1980 as a contributor to the “Hercules Village” Historic District — a worker village associated with the Hercules Powder Company — which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NR8000079). The Hercules Village was associated with the Hercules Powder Works, which came to be one of the most significant explosives and chemical factories in the west. Today about 2 7 buildings associated with the former use remain in existence, including approximately 20 houses on Bay and Pinole Streets that were moved and/or restored in the mid-1980s, the Civic Arts building that houses Leila by the Bay, and six other vacant building s, including the Queen Anne, three of which have been relocated from their original sites. 22-996
162
Prior Relocations and Disassembly
In 2002, to accommodate anticipated site grading, the Bixby Company removed the structure from its foundation and relocated it about one hundred feet west of its original site. In 2010, the City of Hercules acquired the structure from Oso Trabuco, its owner, and moved it about a half mile south to the City’s corporation yard . This relocation required cutting the building in two.

Prior Historic Resource Evaluation
In February 2018, the City obtained a Historic Resource Evaluation of the house from M-Group to support its relocation and rehabilitation . Given that the resource ha d been removed from its original setting and removed from its former associations, the evaluation determined it no longer retain ed the ability to convey its district-level significance associated with the Hercules Village. According to the report, the only historic significance that would be retained by the structure once moved and renovated would be that the structure was once occupied by Eugene (Gene) Woodfield , who served as mayor from 1962-1975 and was “instrumental in crafting the City’s first General Plan an d creating a blueprint for how the City would evolve following the closure of the Hercules Plant” and for whom the first City park was named.

Failed Relocation Effort
Rockhead and Quarry, the house movers selected by the City in 2016 to move and rehabilitate the Queen Anne, withdrew from the project in May 2024, which voided the bill of sale that was executed in 2022.

Current Historic Resource Evaluation
As directed by Council on July 9, 2024, staff obtained an updated Historic Resource Evaluation (Attachment 1) from M -Group, focusing on the integrity of the structure following its disassembly and continued exposure to the elements. The evaluation found that the structure in its current condition does not retain integrity sufficient to convey it s individual significance and thus no longer constitutes a historic resource under CEQA.

ANALYSIS:

The updated Historic Resource Evaluation focusing on integrity that the City obtained from M-Group (Attachment 2) has found that the disassembled Queen Anne house no longer retains sufficient integrity to convey its individual significance. Combined with the structure’s prior loss of its district -level significance due to its relocation, the evaluation confirmed that the structure no longer constitutes a historic resource under the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is now free to file a Notice of Exemption from CEQA and pursue demolition.

The City has received complaints from area residents over the years about the appearance of the dilapida ted structure. Staff is seeking the Council’s authorization to 163
obtain bids for the demolition and removal of the structure , and an appropriation from reserves to cover the anticipated cost of hazardous materials testing and demolition.

Demolition Considerations
Based on past City Attorney analysis, demolition would likely be a public project subject to procurement requirements under the Public Contract Code and prevailing wage requirements under the Labor Code. The procurement would also need to comply with the City's policy and procedures for capital projects.

Demolition debris would need to be processed in accordance with the City’s franchise agreement with Republic Services and applicable regulations. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District must be notified and its regulations must always be followed when removing asbestos or demolishing buildings. The 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen), as amended in the City’s Municipal Code , requires that at least 65% by weight of job site debris generated by demolition projects to be recycled, reused, or otherwise diverted from landfill disposal. CalGreen requires submission of plans and reports with verifiable post-project documentation to demonstrate that at least 65% of the nonhazardous construction and demolition (C&D) debris generated on the job site are salvaged for reuse, recycled or otherwise diverted.

In October 2021, Phil Joy Housemoving added additional steel I -beams and wood cribbing to support the house and remove the sag ging that had been occurring from the prior (2010) temporary shoring equipment put in place by Trost Jacking and Heavy Moving, Inc. Both house movers will need to be notified if and when the house is moved from the corporation yard so that they can retrieve their steel beams from beneath it.

FISCAL IMPACT:

In 2016, staff estimated the potential cost of demolition at approximately $25,000, assuming hazardous material such as asbestos were not present. Staff estimates that cost would be at least $38,000 today, due to general construction cost inflation of nearly 50% between 2016 and 2024, per the California Construction Cost Index published by the Department of Finance.

Because the prior cost estimates excluded hazardous materials testing and abatement, and because lead-based paint was in near -universal use prior to its ban in 1978, staff proposes to first procure independent hazardous materials testing to confirm which regulated hazardous materials are present in the structure.

With these test results in hand, staff would then informally solicit three bids from qualified and experienced demolition contractors to conduct the work in accordance with all applicable regulations, including handling of lead-based paint, asbestos, PCBs and other hazardous materials ; complying with the Construction & Demolition provisions of the 164
CalGreen Building Code and with the City’s Franchise Agreement with Republic Services; and obtaining all required permits.

Staff believes the full cost of testing and demolition, as well as a contingency, can be accommodated within the City Manager’s signature authority of $50,000 for capital projects.

Funds are available and will be appropriated in Facilities Maintenance Fund under expenditure account # 470-5433-611.90-00. If no contractor provides a responsive and responsible bid within that limit, staff would first contact additional contractors for bids, and, if unsuccessful, return to Council for additional direction.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attach 1 – Resolution
Attach 2 – Historic Resource Evaluation (2024)

Financial Impact
Description: Queen Anne House Demolition
Funding Source: Facilities Maintenance Fund (470-5433-611.90-00) Budget Recap:

Total Estimated cost: $50,000 New Revenue: None
Amount Budgeted: Lost Revenue: N/A
New funding required: Yes New Personnel: N/A
Council Policy Change: Yes No

165
RESOLUTION NO. 24-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERCULES FINDING

DEMOLITION OF THE QUEEN ANNE HOUSE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), AUTHORIZING DEMOLITION OF THE QUEEN ANNE HOUSE, AND AMENDING THE FY 24-25 BUDGET INCREASING ITS APPROPRIATION BY $50,000

WHEREAS, a Queen Anne style house that was built around 1905 as part of the worker village associated with the Hercules Powder Company was identified in 1980 as a contributor to the “Hercules Village” Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and

WHEREAS, the structure was once occupied by Eugene (Gene) Woodfield, who served as mayor from 1962 -1975 and was instrumental in crafting the City’s first General Plan and creating a blueprint for how the City would evolve following the closure of the Hercules Plant, and for whom the first City park was named; and

WHEREAS, the Queen Anne house was removed f rom its foundation and relocated nearby by a developer in 2002; and

WHEREAS, the City purchased the house from its owner in 2010, cut it in half, and moved it to the City’s Corporation Yard, where it remains today; and

WHEREAS, envisioned reuse of the house as a City park facility proved infeasible; and

WHEREAS, in 2016 the City solicited bids for the removal and renovation of the house at no cost to the City, received one bid , and selected Rockhead and Quarry, LLC to purchase the home with the intent to relocate it outside Hercules and rehabilitate it for residential use; and

WHEREAS, in February 2018 the City obtained a Historic Resource Assessment from a qualified consultant, which found that the relocated structure had lost its district -level significance but would retain its individual-level significance if relocated again and rehabilitated; and

WHEREAS, in May 2018 the Planning Commission approved a resolution finding that a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15331 – Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation was adequate to address the environmental consequences of relocation and rehabilitation of the Queen Anne house, provided it was done in a manner consistent with the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; and

166
WHEREAS, in 2022, the City executed a bill of sale with Rockhead and Quarry, LLC, making the sale contingent upon the removal of the structure pursuant to an encroachment permit issued by the City; and

WHEREAS, in January 2024, Rockhead and Quarry removed the roof from the structure in preparation for its planned relocation to Pinole; and

WHEREAS, in May 2024, Rockhead and Quarry notified the City that they would not be able to complete the project, thereby voiding the Bill of Sale; and

WHEREAS, the structure was largely exposed to the elements from 2010 until 2024, is severely deteriorated, and has been the subject of numerous complaints from Hercules residents due to its dilapidated condition; and

WHEREAS, in September 2024, the City received an updated Historic Resource Evaluation focusing on the integrity of the structure, which found that it no longer had sufficient integrity to convey its individual significance and t hus no longer constituted a historic resource under the California Environmental Quality Act; and

WHEREAS, staff estimates the cost of demolishing the structure under applicable regulations would be less than $50,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hercules as follows:

1. The City Council hereby finds demolition of the Queen Anne house located at the City’s Corporation Yard to be categorically exempt from CEQA in that a Historic Resource Evaluation prepared by a qualified architectural historian found that that (1) the Queen Anne structure no longer retains integr ity to support its historic significance with its association with former mayor Eugene Woodfield; (2) that the Queen Anne is therefore no longer eligible as a historic resources in the National Register of Historic Places, and subsequently is no longer eli gible as a historic resource within the California Register of Historic Resources ; and (3) that the Queen Anne no longer qualifies individually as a historical resource under CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(a)(3).

2. The City Council hereby authorizes the demolitio n of the Queen Anne house in accordance with applicable regulations.

3. The City Council hereby approves an amendment to the City’s FY 24-25 Budget, increasing its appropriation by $50,000 for demolition of the structure.

167
The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hercules held on the 22nd day of October 2024 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

____________________________
Dan Romero, Mayor

ATTEST:

Eibleis Melendez, City Clerk
168
September 17, 2024

Timothy Rood
Community Development Director
Community Development Department
City of Hercules
111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA 94547

RE: FINAL – Historic Resource Integrity Evaluation
Building 54 / Queen Anne

Dear Timothy,

Enclosed is the Final Historic Resource Integrity Evaluation (Evaluation) prepared of the Hercules Powder Works Building 54, also referred to as the “Queen Anne”, built circa 1905 and originally located on 2 Kings Avenue and previously associated with the Hercules Village Historic District. In accordance with the agreed scope of work for the proposal dated July 18, 2024, Task 1 (Project Initiation and Site Visit), Task 2 (Draft Evaluation) , and Task 3 ( Final Evaluation) are now complete. On September 16, 2024, City staff reviewed the Draft Evaluation and provided comments which were addressed in the Final Evaluation. The Final Evaluation is provided on the following page, Attachment A.

Please reach out at your earliest convenience if you have any questions on the Final Evaluation and we may schedule a follow -up meeting. I look forward to speaking with you at your earliest convenience.

Respectfully submitted,

ISABEL CASTELLANO
Historic Preservation Specialist
[email protected]
707.304.7215
169
PREPARED FOR:

Community Development Department
City of Hercules
111 Civic Drive,
Hercules, CA 94547
PREPARED BY:

Metropolitan Planning Group (M-Group)
Isabel Castellano, Historic Preservation Specialist
Sean Manalo, Associate Planner

170

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Historical Resource Integrity Evaluation (Evaluation) was prepared by Metropolitan Planning Group (M-Group) at the request of the City of Hercules, Community Development Department to provide a determination whether the Hercules Powder Works Building 54, also referred to as the “Queen Anne,” (subject structure), retains integrity as a historic resource in accordance with the National Register Criteria for Evaluation and with Article 5, §15064.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

The subject structure was evaluated in 2017 and was found to have individual significance based on its association with former Hercules Mayor Woodfield and was determined to retain integrity to convey that significance. As a result of the 2017 Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) the Queen Anne was considered a historic resource for the purposes of CEQA. However, as outlined in this evaluation, the structure no longer retains integrity due to its deteriorated state and does not convey its historic significance. Therefore, the subject structure no longer qualifies individually as a historical resource under CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(a)(3)

2. SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject structure was constructed in approximately 1905, originally located at 2 Kings Avenue, and was formerly listed as a contributor to the “Hercules Village” Historic District. The Hercules Village was associated with the Hercules Powder Company, w hich came to be one of the most significant explosives and chemical factories in the west. The factory comprised nine square miles of the Refugio Creek watershed, with two piers extending to the San Pablo Bay and an extensive internal railroad system powered by compressed-air locomotives.

The subject structure was taken off its foundation and moved to a location slightly west of its original site by the Bixby Company between 2001 and 2002. In 2010, the subject structure was moved by the City of Hercules to the City -owned Corporate Yard, approximately one -half mile from its original location and outside of the District boundaries. The subject structure is supported over steel I-beams and surrounded by a chain link fence.

3. METHODOLOGY
The methodological approach used to complete this evaluation consisted of conducting a site visit with photographic documentation of the structure, brief historical research of the structure and the associated persons and events, and a review of former evaluations (refer to Appendix I to VI).

In addition, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and the California Historic Preservation’s (OHP’s) “Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD), were consulted.

A site visit was completed by M-Group Associate Planner, Sean Manalo, on August 7, 2024. During the site visit, the subject structure’s existing condition was recorded with photographs of the 171
structure and its site (Appendix IV). Additional notes on the architectural features of the subject structure were recorded for the development of this evaluation.

The Evaluation was completed by M -Group Historic Preservation Specialist, Isabel Castellano.

Isabel Castellano meets the Secretary of the Interior Standards Professional Qualifications for Architectural Historian, Architecture, and Historic Architecture. She holds a Master of Arts in Conservation Studies of Historic Buildings and a Bachelor of Architecture.

4. HISTORIC OVERVIEW
An in -depth historic overview of the subject structure is available in the Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) completed by Lilly Biano, M-Group Preservation Specialist, dated January 5, 2017 (Appendix I). The HRE provided a historic context of the Hercules Powder Company, an outgrowth of the California Powder Works founded in 1861 in Santa Cruz, California which grew to be one of the most significant explosives and chemical plants in the west. Additional context was also provided for the Worker Village that accommodated the Hercules Powder Company workforce due to their isolated location and rental shortages in Pinole.

5. HISTORY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
The subject structure was one of thirty buildings included within the Hercules Powder Company, listed as the “Hercules Village” historic district in the National Register of Historic Places in 1980.

The subject structure was identified as a contributing structure to the historic district. The Queen Anne was taken off its foundation and moved to a location slightly west of its original site by the Bixby Company between 2001 and 2002. In 2010, the subject structure was cut into two pieces and moved by the City of Hercules to the City-owned Corporate Yard, approximately one-half mile from its original location and outside of the District boundaries.

M-Group was retained in 2017 to prepare historical and environmental documentation, including a Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE), to evaluate potential impacts related to a proposal to again relocate the building (Appendix I). The HRE evaluated the historic significance of the building and determined that the structure had lost its significance as a contributor to the Hercules Village Historic District based on its relocation outside of the boundaries of the district. However, the HRE found that the subject structure had individual significance based on its association with former Hercules Mayor Woodfield and at the time of the evaluation the building retained integrity to convey that significance and therefore was considered a historic resource for the pu rposes of CEQA in 2017.

Following the completion of the HRE, the City of Hercules Planning Commission adopted Resolution #18-11 finding that the Relocation and Rehabilitation of the Queen Anne from its location at 1000 Sycamore Avenue in the City’s Corporation Yard to an undetermined location was Categorically Exempt under CEQA Guidelines. As noted in the City of Hercules’s Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report, dated May 7, 2018 (Appendix II), the need for an environmental 172
determination for moving the subject structure originated as a result of direction from the City Council in September 2016 to market the subject structure “to interested buyers that intend to rehabilitate and use the structure either in the City or in another community.” A 2016 solicitation process for the structure’s removal at no cost to the City (Appendix V) resulted in the selection of a house mover, Rockhead and Quarry, with whom a Bill of Sale was executed in 2022 with the intention to relocate the house to a site i n Pinole. In preparation to move the house to a site in Pinole, the house mover deconstructed the roof and front gable and stored the roofing lumber inside the subject structure. The front shingled gable was unable to fit inside and was stored outdoors, on the ground and exposed to the elements. In 2024, the subject structure was wrapped in a temporary tarp to prevent intrusion from rain.

Rockhead and Quarry notified the City on May 22, 2024 , that they were withdrawing from the project. No repairs or maintenance of the subject structure appears to have occurred since its relocation to the City’s Corporation Yard. A site visit to evaluate the existing conditions of the subject structure was conducted on August 7, 2024, by Sean Manalo, Associate Planner . Up to date photographs taken during the site visit are included in Appendix VIII.

6. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject structure was originally built in the Queen Anne architectural style, common from 1880 to 1910. A typical Queen Anne structure includes a steeply pitched roof of irregular shape, patterned shingles, cutaway bay windows, an asymmetrical façade with partial or full-width porch is usually one -story in height and extends along one or both side walls. Decorating detailing subtypes include spindlework, free classic, half-timbered, and patterned masonry work. Most of the single -family residential struc tures, within the Hercules Village District were designed as Queen Anne architectural style, referred to as “Queen Ann Cottages,” and varied between one- to two-stories.

The subject structure was not an elaborate example of the Queen Anne style and did not retain architectural merits for high ornamentation. The HRE (Appendix 1) described the subject structure as follows:

The primary entry features a partial, recessed porch supported by turned posts and was originally accessed by wood stairs, which are no longer intact. The entrance is centered and to the left of it is an angled bay window with gabled roof. The house is punctuated with simple double hung wood windows. Detailing on the house is relatively muted with the only embellishments being the fish scale shingles adorning the gable front of the cutaway bay and spindle work on the porch supports.

The HRE (Appendix 1) also identified the character defining features of the subject structure to be its one- story height, cross gable roof, partial porch, angled and square bay windows, double hung windows, v ariation in siding materials , and s pindle work . The following content provides an evaluation of the existing conditions of these character defining features. 173
a. One-story height: The subject structure relatively retains its one-story height. However, the building had been divided into two pieces for its temporary relocation. The interior of the building was not accessed for this evaluation due to its unsafe condition, temporarily placed over the steel I-beams and covered with a temporary tarp. Other features near the roof, eaves, and porch, which were covered by the temporary tarp, may have been partially lowered, damaged, and/or reduced in height.
b. Cross gable roof : The subject structure’s primary cross gable roof had been removed in pieces and no longer provided coverage to the building’s interior. A piece of the decorated shingle is located on the ground, at the base of the structure. A temporary tarp is fixed above the subject structure and tied to the four primary corners. The subject structure’s secondary gable roof profile is visible from the edge of the temporary tarp. c. Partial porch: The partial porch was not identifiable within the subject structure. Exposed flooring on one side of the subject structure suggests that the partial porch was divided when the structure was split into two pieces during its relocation. d. Angled and square bay windows: The angled and square bays were not completely covered by the temporary tarp and have gravely deteriorated. Paint layers on the wood horizontal siding and window trim have pealed and chipped away leaving surfaces of dirt, built grime, dust, and exposed wood.
e. Doubled hung windows : Similarly to the angled and square bays, the windows were not completely covered by the temporary tarp. The windows’ wood frames and muntins have lost their exterior paint finish. Many of the muntins are out of place or missing. Surveyed from a distance, the window frames appeared non-operable, and many have been pried and left open. Most of the windows have been boarded from the inside and no longer retain its original glazing.
f. Variation in siding materials : The only siding material visible and not covered by the temporary tarp is the horizontal wood siding material. If other variations of siding materials were contained in the subject structure, it is presumed to have been removed and/or altered.
g. Spindle work: No spindle work was visible on the subject structure within the areas uncovered by the temporary tarp. It is presumed to have been deteriorated and hidden under the temporary tarp, and/or removed from the subject structure.

7. INTEGRITY EVALUATION
Properties listed within the National Register are automatically listed in the California Register of Historic Resources. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) resources that meet the criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources are considered historical resources for the purposes of CEQA. The State Office of Historic Preservation has recommended the National Register of Historic Properties Criteria for Evaluation as a uniform standard for California because they 174
provide a basis for assessing the significance of historical resources at the national, state, and local levels. As such, they encompass and provide for routine consideration of other applicable state and local criteria.1
Determination of historical significance requires that several factors are considered, including the property’s history (both construction and use); the history and context of the surrounding community; an association with important persons or uses; the number of resources associated with the property; the potential for the resources to be the work of a master architect, builder, craftsman, landscape gardener, or artist; the historical, architectural or landscape influences that have shaped the property’s design and its pattern of use; and alterations that have taken place; and lastly how these changes may have affected the property’s historical integrity.

Historic resources must possess both historical significance and retain historic integrity. As identified in the National Register Bulletin, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance. The National Register criteria recognizes seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. As previously noted in the HRE (Appendix 1), it is not required that a property retains all of its historic physical features or characteristics, rather a property must retain at the very least, those essential features which allow it to convey its significance. The essential features are those that define (1) why a property is significant and (2) when it was significant. The seven aspects of integrity include location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association.

After the relocation of the subject structure, it was evaluated and found to retain enough integrity to convey its significant association with former mayor, Eugene Woodfield, who served as mayor from 1962 to 1975 and was instrumental in shaping modern Hercules following the closure of the explosives/chemical plant (refer to Appendix 1 – HRE, page 12). In 2015, the subject structure retained integrity as an individually significant resource associated with a person demonstrably important in local history.

The evaluation provided below assesses each of the seven aspects of integrity based on the subject structure’s condition evaluated during the site visit, conducted on August 7, 2024, to determine whether there is sufficient integrity remaining to support the Queen Anne’s significance associated with the former Mayor Eugene Woodfield.

1. Location: Refers to the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where historic event occurred.

The subject structure has been relocated twice. It was originally located at 2 Kings Avenue, within the Hercules Village Historic District. Then, relocated to approximately 100 feet west of its original site, but still within the boundaries of the Hercul es Village Historic District in 1 California Office of Historic Preservation . Instructions for Recording Historical Resources , March 1995. Available at:
https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1054/files/manual95.pdf
175
approximately 2002. Its second relocation occurred in 2010, when the subject structure was moved by the City of Hercules to the City-owned Corporate Yard, approximately one-half mile from its original location and outside of the District boundaries. This second relocation was intended as a temporary location to allow time and interested parties to propose an appropriate location for the subject structure. However, the house mover selected by the City abandoned the project in 2024. It has since remained in two pieces at the City’s Corporation Yard. The City’s Corporation Yard is not a suitable or permanent location, and does not support nor reflect similarities with the subject structure’s historic place in a residential or village (mixed-use) area as the residence of the former Mayor Eugene Woodfield. As such, the subject property no longer retains the integrity of location.

2. Design: Refers to the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property.

The design of the subject structure has been compromised since its overall form, plan, and structure have been affected with the splitting of the structure into two pieces. Removal of the roof and use of a temporary tarp increased its deterioration and los s of historic fabric. The subject structure’s Queen Anne architectural style is slightly identifiable. However, its character defining features have been deteriorated beyond repair. Refer to Section 6 of the evaluation for description of its existing condi tions and evaluation of character defining features. As such, the subject structure no longer retains the integrity of design.

3. Setting: Refers to the physical environment of a historic property.

The subject structure is no longer located in its original location at 2 Kings Avenue, where its setting included a ridge, above the Hercules Powder Company plant operations in an area known as “the Hill.” As similarly noted for the evaluation integrity of location, the City’s Corporation Yard is not a suitable and not a permanent location, and does not support nor reflect similarities with the subject structure’s historic place of a residential or village (mixed- use) area as the residence of the former May or Eugene Woodfield . As such, the subject structure no longer retains the integrity of setting.

4. Materials: Refers to the physical elements that were combines or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.

As previously described in Section 5 of the evaluation, no repairs or maintenance of the subject structure appears to have occurred since its relocation to the City’s Corporation Yard.

The roof was removed into sections and a temporary tarp was placed as t he only protection from the elements. Some roof pieces were left on the ground at the base of the subject structure. The exterior and structural elements that supported and enclosed the subject structure have been comprised with its removal, split, and/or deterioration. Due to its state of deterioration and the fact that various architectural features have been removed, destroyed, 176
or are no longer evident, the subject structure barely reflects a residential structure to identify as the former Mayor Eugene Woodfield’s residence. As such, the subject structure no longer retains the integrity of materials needed to convey its significance.

5. Workmanship: Refers to the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.

Some architectural features that identify the subject structure as a Queen Anne architectural style remain. These include the wood horizontal siding, angled and square bay windows, and double hung windows. However, they have been exposed to the weather, without repair, and have deteriorated beyond repair. Architectural detailing in the workmanship of the subject structure are no longer identifiable or salvageable. As such, the subject structure no longer retains the integrity of workmanship.

6. Feeling: Refers to a property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.

As previously evaluated in the HRE (Appendix 1), the subject structure was significant based on its collective contribution as a residential home associated with the Hercules Village. It was not able to communicate such significance in isolation. After its second relocation to the City’s Corporation Yard, the subject structure no longer retained the integrity of feeling as a contributor to the Hercules Village Historic District. Due to its state of deterioration and that various architectural features have been removed, destroyed, or are no longer evident, the subject structure barely reflects a residential structure to identify as the former Mayor Eugene Woodfield’s residence. As such, the subject structure no longer retains the integrity of feeling.

7. Association: Refers to the direct link between an important historic events or person and a historic property.

Similarly to the integrity of feeling, the integrity of association first related with the Hercules Village Historic District. The subject structure los t its integrity of association to the historic district after its second relocation to the City’s Corporation Yard. Within the HRE (Appendix 1), a second association of the subject structure was identified to the former Mayor Eugene Woodfield. As previously evaluated in 2018, building or structure removed from its original location, but which is primarily significant for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event, may still be considered to retain integrity despite it s relocation. This is particularly true for resources which are relocated in an effort to avoid demolition or destruction. However, as of the site visit completed on August 7, 2024, the subject structure demonstrated deterioration beyond repair and relocation did not appear as a viable option with the subject structure’s current existing conditions. As such, the subject structure no longer retains the integrity of association to the Hercules Village Historic District or to the former Mayor Eugene Woodfield. 177

8. APPLICATION OF CEQA
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code §21084.1 provides that any project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. Public Resources Code §5020.1(q) defines “substantial adverse change” as demolition, destruction, relocation or alteration such that the significance of the historical resource would be impaired. According to the Public Resources Code §5024.1, an historical resou rce is a resource that is listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources; included in a local register of historical resources; or is identified as significant in a historic resource survey if that survey meets specified criteria.

According to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(a)(3), a lead agency can find a resource has been determined to be significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military or cultural annals of Calif ornia provided that the determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record.

Due to the loss of the subject structure’s overall integrity to convey its significance as first a contributing structure to the Hercules Village Historic District, and secondly as the residence of the former Mayor Eugene Woodfield, who served as mayor from 1962 to 1975 , the subject structure is no longer identified as a historic resource. Therefore, the application of CEQA pursuant to Guidelines §15064.5(a)(3), is no longer applicable.

9. RECOMMENDATIONS
The City of Hercules Community Development Department staff expressed the possibility of demolition to the subject structure if evaluated that the subject structure no longer retained integrity and therefore was not considered a historic resource. The integrity evaluation determination confirmed that due to a loss of integrity that the Queen Anne is no longer identified as a historic resource, it is recommended that the City of Hercules Community Development Department complete the following two recommendations prior to demolition. ❖ It is recommended that the California State Office of Historic Preservation is notified prior to the demolition of the subject structure, and presented with a copy of th e subject structure’s 2017 HRE and this integrity evaluation report.
❖ It is recommended that all records associated with the subject structure, including evaluations, Planning Department files, etc., are submitted and recorded with the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) for the record of the Hercules Village Historic District.

178

10. CONCLUSION
Based on the Historic Resource Integrity Evaluation, the Hercules Powder Works Building 54, also referred to as the “Queen Anne,” (subject structure ), in the City of Hercules, no longer possess integrity to support its historical significance as a historic resource. It is the professional opinion of M -Group that (1) the subject structure no longer retains integrity to support its historic significance with its association with former mayor, Eugene Woodfield , (2) that the subject structure is therefore no longer eligible as a historic resources in the National Register of Historic Places, subsequently is no longer eligible as a historic resource within the California Reg ister of Historic Resources, and (3) no longer qualifies individually as a historical resource under CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(a)(3). It is also recommended that that the City of Hercules Community Development Department review and consider the t wo recommendations presented in this evaluation prior to demolition of the subject structure.

179

11. BIBLIOGRAPHY
California State Office of Historic Preservation. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ California Office of Historic Preservation. Instructions for Recording Historical Resources, March 1995. Available at: https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1054/files/manual95.pdf City of Hercules. Community Development Department. Planning Records.

McAlester, Virginia S. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York, NY; Alfred A. Knopf, 2013.

National Archives Catalog. California SP Hercules Village. Available at:
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/123858536
National Park Service. Heritage Documentation Programs – Historic American Building Survey (HABS).

Available at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/heritagedocumentation/guidelines.htm National Parks Service, National Register of Historic Places. https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP.

U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Cultural Resources. How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Available at:
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15_web508.pdf

180

APPENDIX I
Historic Resource Evaluation & Environmental Documentation, dated January 5, 2017 Provided in the following page.

The rest of this page is left blank intentionally.

181
m-group a new design on urban planning
policy planning  urban design  environmental review  historic preservation  community engagement  staffing solutions

February 22, 2018

Holly Smyth, Planning Director
City of Hercules
11 Civic Drive
Hercules, CA 94547

RE: Historic Resource Evaluation
The “Queen Anne House”
Hercules, CA

The attached Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) and environmental documentation has been prepared for the “Queen Anne House.” The “Queen Anne House” is identified as a contributor to the “Hercules Village” Historic District — a worker village associated with the Hercules Powder Company— which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NR8000079). Since District listing in 1980, the house has been re-located twice and is presently located in the city-owned Corporate Yard, approximately one-half mile from its original location and outside of the District boundaries. The house has also been separated in to two pieces. A proposal is underway to re-locate the subject house once again and rehabilitate the building for continued use. This Historic Resource Evaluation has been prepared to confirm the type of significance, determine the level of integrity that remains, and to inform the requisite CEQA review.

The findings of the evaluation confirm that the “Queen Anne House” is significant at the state level as a contributor to the Hercules Village Historic District and also individually significant based on its association with former Hercules mayor, Eugene Woodfield . Given that the resource has been removed from the original setting and removed from its former associations, it no longer retains the ability to convey its significance associated with the Hercules Village. However, the resource does retain the ability to convey significance associated with former mayor, Eugene Woodfield, who played a significant role in the recent development of the City of Hercules.

Please do not hesitate to contact me at (707) 2 59-1790 with any questions related to the review or if clarification would be helpful.

Sincerely,

Heather Hines Lilly Bianco, MHP M-Group | Principal M-Group | Preservation Specialist 182

The Queen Anne House

Historic Resource
Evaluation
City of Hercules, CA
January 5, 2017

Prepared by
m-group
1303 Jefferson Street, Suite 100-B
Napa, CA 94559
183

Historic Resource Evaluation 3 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA

1. Purpose
The City of Hercules has requested that M-Group provide the appropriate level of environmental documentation needed to comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and facilitate the re-location of the “Queen Anne House ,” a historic residential building listed on the National Register of Historic Places and identified as a historic resource in the General Plan.

The Queen Anne House is listed as a contributor to the “Hercules Village” Historic District (Building No.54). The Hercules Village was associated with the Hercules Powder Company, which came to be one of the most significant explosives and chemical factories in the west. The factory comprised nine square miles of the Refugio Creek watershed, with two piers extending to the San Pablo Bay and an extensive internal railroad system powered by compressed-air locomotives.

The explosives plant operated from the late 1890s into the 1940s after which time it diversified to also manufacture fertilizer. Beginning in 1972, the former plant was subdivided and transformed into residential suburbs. Today approximately 34 buildings associated with the former use are still intact. According to the National Register nomination, the District is significant as one of the last company towns in America and as a contributor to the Historic District, the Queen Anne’s significance associated with the former plant is largely reliant on the ability to interpret what remains of the cohesiveness of original village fabric.

At present, the Queen Anne house is located in the City’s Corp Yard, approximately one -half mile from its original location. The project proposal involves a request to re-locate and rehabilitate the subject house. The final destination is not known at this time, but it is understood that the final destination will most likely be outside of the Hercules City limits. The subject building is listed on the National Register and by default, the California Register, and therefore any activities that could adversely affect its integrity are subject to CEQA review.

2. Methodology
M-Group used a systematic approach to perform the Historic Resource Evaluation. Our approach included review of archival information for the subject property , review of records available at the Contra Costa Historical Society, Pleasant Hill Library , as well as additional online resources includ ing the California Digital Newspaper Collection. The evaluation was further informed by a great deal of email and phone communication with members of the Hercules Historic Society. Finally, a field survey was undertaken by M-Group Preservation Specialist, Lilly Bianco on November 30th, 2017 to evaluate the level of integrity that remains and obtain a more clear understanding of how the proposed relocation may impact the subject resource.

The evaluation focuses on the identification of areas of significance, essential character defining features important for conveying the propert y’s significance, the role the property played in the larger context of the District and the City of Hercules, and an assessment of the extent to which 184

Historic Resource Evaluation 4 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
those essential features have or have not been retained. This evaluation concludes with an abbreviated discussion of potential environmental impacts, as needed to inform the CEQA Analysis.

3. Summary of findings
The following Evaluation performed for the subject property confirms that the “Queen Anne” House is significant as a contributor to the Hercules Village. However, its relocation to an area outside of the District and disassociation from what is left of the “worker village” eliminates its ability to convey its significance as part of the former Hercules Powder Company and precludes it from serving as a contributor to the Historic District.

However, review of the “Queen Anne’s” architectural merit and occupant history indicates that it is significant at the individual level in accordance with CRHR Criterion 2 based on its association with former Hercules mayor, Eugene Woodfield, who served as mayor from 1962 to 1975. mayor Woodfield was instrumental in the creation of the City’s first General Plan in 1972 and in developing the blueprint for modern Hercules. In its current location, within the boundaries of the City, the “Queen Anne” House is able to convey its significance based on its association with former mayor, Eugene Woodfield and his political contributions and while it exhibits a seriously degraded condition, it retains historic integrity.

In its present state the subject house is particularly vulnerable to demolition by neglect. Given it’ s vulnerable state and in the absence of other options to preserve in place or relocate to another location within the City limits, the proposed rehabilitation consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (SOIS) and relocation to an alternative location would be an appropriate treatment and would not constitute an adverse impact to an identified historic resource as the residence would continue to be eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources despite its relocation.

4. Historic Context.

Hercules Powder Company
The Hercules Powder Company —an outgrowth of the California Powder Works founded in 1861 in Santa Cruz, California — grew to be one of the most significant explosives and chemical plants in the west. At its height the factory comprised nine square miles of the Refugio Creek watershed and employed approximately 300 workers.

In 1867, swede, Alfred Nobel, invented dynamite and it quickly became the explosive of choice for mining and tunneling in hard rock. In response to these new innovations and in 1879, the California Powder Works acquired 44.94 acres of land midway between Pinole and Rodeo where they established a plant. In 1881, The Powder Works began manufacturing “Hercules powder”— an explosive comprised of nitroglycerine absorbed in magnesium carbonate. 185

Historic Resource Evaluation 5 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
As activities continued to ramp up and the operation grew, the management identified a need for improved governance and incorporated as a City on December 15, 1900. Not long thereafter, in 1903 the DuPont Family (One of California Powder Works largest stockholders) acquired the company, but by 1912 was ordered by judicial decree to dissolve the company due to DuPont’s violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. This resulted in the California Powder Works being divided into two distinct companies, one of which was the Hercules Powder Company.

The Hercules Powder Company went on to produce not just dynamite, but also black powder and TNT. In the 1940s, the plant diversified and began manufacturing fertilizers that included methanol , formaldehyde, and urea formaldehyde. The plant officially closed in 1976 due to overseas competition. Even before that, in 1972, portions of the operations had already been sold off to developers for subdivision and to be transformed into residential suburbs. The plant was dismantled and today 34 buildings and structures associated with the former use remain.

Worker Village
To reconcile the need for workers with the isolated location of the plant and rental shortages in Pinole, the California Powder Works, and later, Hercules Powder Company, went about constructing their own housing to accommodate their workforce. The construction of the workforce housing took place over several decades and coincided with fluctuations in worker demand. Each phase of development exhibits a relatively distinct architectural style reflective of the era in which it was built.

The configuration of the plant was such that the manufacturing and operations were located closest to the Bay, with the “village” and workforce housing located in a relatively protected area removed from the manufacturing area and shielded by a hill.

The first homes were built as simple Queen Anne cottages. Later, in the early 1900s, a series of colonial revival homes were constructed along Bay, Hercules, Park, Pinole and Santa Fe streets and in 1915, and coinciding with growth of the Company and introduction of a new TNT plant, duplexes were constructed on Hercules and Bay Streets.

In the intervening years between WWI and WWII, the Company town exhibited the largest population of company towns located in the East B ay— a guide to 1930’s California, listed it’s population as 392, while the populations of other company towns did not exceed 220 residents. 1 Later on, and in anticipation of increased demand for munitions just before WWII, a number of US Government funded homes were commissioned, but were not actually completed until after the wars end. The final phase of workforce housing, a series of WWII era homes, was constructed on Skelly, Durham, and Bacchus streets. 2
Following the end of WWII, the need for worker housing had diminished along with the demand for explosives and in an effort to limit hazards associated with vacant homes, the company demolished

1 Cori Ojala and Kevin McGrath, Remembering Days Past, Hercules, CA 1879- 1987. 4 2 Cori Ojala and Kevin McGrath, Remembering Days Past, Hercules, CA 1879- 1987. 4 186

Historic Resource Evaluation 6 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
Figure 1 2 Kings Avenue. Photo Courtesy of
HHS
a number of unused structures. In 1980, 36 buildings associated with the former Powder Works operations remained and were distributed among “The Hill,” “The Village” and on the “Acid Wharf”.

In August of 1980, the remaining resources were listed as contributors to the “Hercules Village” National Register Historic District and listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

The worker housing that remained and was in restorable condition, includ ed 20 Queen Anne and Colonial Revival Style homes dating to the turn of the Century, were restored by Aegis Corporation.

In October of 1980, 13 of the homes were moved from adjacent streets and re-located to be concentrated on Bay and Pinole streets with seven other historic worker homes remaining in their original location to form a cluster of former worker homes. The December 1981 Herculean described the plans for the District, as follows:
“The developer has plans to make the streetscape similar to that of the turn of the century when the homes were built. Upon approval of the Hercules Municipal Historic District Board (the City Council members), the developers will paint the homes to reflect their design. The colors will be muted and an overall color scheme will be used for the whole area. Doors, windows and decorative touches will be accented with colors complementing the main body of the houses. The interiors will reflect the era of the homes.” Restoration and relocation activities were completed in 1984. The Street remained in its original width of 25 feet and each home features a brass plaque by the front door communicating its national register status
Queen Anne House
Constructed in approximately 1905 and originally
located at 2 Kings Avenue 3, immediately northwest
of the “Clubhouse building” 4, the “Queen Anne
House” housed senior plant personnel and later
served office functions. It was constructed on the
ridge, above the plant operations in an area known
as “the Hill .” “The Hill” was comprised of a complex
of administrative, technical, and social buildings
that included the White Columns, the
superintendent’s mansion, a men’s clubhouse, and
Quinan Hall, a bachelor quarters and social hall, as

3 (Referred to as Building no. 54 by Hercules Powder Company 4 (Referred to as Building 8103 by Hercules Powder Company 187

Historic Resource Evaluation 7 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
well as, a post office, dining hall, and kindergarten. 5 This area was distinct from “the village” located below the ridge, which consisted of approximately 100 company-built worker homes . At its height, the Hercules Powder Company Village included approximately 100 worker homes .

Data regarding previous tenants of 2 Kings
Avenue is very limited. However, available
records6 indicate that in the 1920s the Robinson
Family, Jovita and Ralph Robinson, along with
daughters, Anita, Eleanor, and Ruth occupied the
house, about whom not much can be discovered .

Later, plant engineer, George Appleton resided at
2 Kings Avenue, followed by plant engineer and
former mayor, Eugene Woodfield and his family.

Eugene (Gene) Woodfield served as mayor of
Hercules from 1962-1975 which, based on
available records on file at the Hercules Historical
Society and personal accounts, appears to have
overlapped with his time living at 2 Kings Avenue;
he passed away in January 17, 1978 due to heart
problems. In a February 1978 city newsletter,
Woodfield is remembered as being instrumental
in the development of the 1972 General Plan
which is the blueprint for the current design of
the City. The City’s f irst park, as well as a street,
was later dedicated in his name.

Available records indicate that, William Thatcher,
a former Hercules employee and watchman for
Valley Nitrogen Producers (which Succeeded Hercules Inc.) was the home’s final occupant.7 Personal accounts of the neighborhood written by the former resident of 6 Kings Avenue, E.M Fawcett, detailed a very neighborly environment where residents often held get-togethers on the lawn and which was a great place to raise children.

On August 22, 1 980, The National Park Service placed the “Queen Anne House,” along with 35 other buildings and structures associated with the Powder Company operations on the National Register of Historic Places. The “Queen Anne House ” is denoted as Building No. 54 in the Hercules Village National Register Nomination (No. 80000799).

5 Posedel, Images of America, 79
6 Available records that detail occupant history include photograph captions included in “ Images of America:

Hercules” and through personal accounts on file at the Hercules Historical Society. 7 Posedel, Images of America, 87
Figure 2 Queen Anne House, undated. Image courtesy of
HHS
188

Historic Resource Evaluation 8 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
By 1984 the house was already described as being in a compromised condition. A building survey conducted at this time indicates that, “brick foundations a re cracked and have settled. Front stairs are in a state of collapse. Roofing and sheet metal need replacement. Siding appears to be intact.” 8 In 2002 and in preparation for site grading associated with a proposed new development, the Bixby Company removed the subject house from its foundation and relocated it approximately 100 feet west of its original site, but still within the boundaries of the Hercules Village Historic District. Later, in 2010 the City of Hercules acquired the house from its then owner, Oso Trabuco, cut it in half to allow for transport, and relocated it to the City’s c orporation yard, near Willett Street and Sycamore Streets, approximately ½ mile from its original location and outside the boundaries of the District.

Today, the Ho use remains on the City’s corp oration yard and although partially secured, its condition continues to deteriorate.

5. Architectural Description
The Queen Anne House, presently located in the city’s corporate yard was built circa 1905. It is a one-story over raised basement, single family residence, designed in the Queen Anne cottage style.

The building is rectangular in plan, clad with channel wood siding, and capped with a cross gabled , asphalt shingle roof. The former foundation appears to have been a brick foundation ; although the residence has since been removed from its foundation. The primary entry features a partial, recessed porch supported by turned posts and was originally accessed by wood stairs, which are no longer intact. The entrance is centered and to the left of it is an angled bay window with gabled roof. The house is punctuated with simple double hung wood windows. Detailing on the house is relatively muted with the only embellishments being the fish scale shingles adorning the gable front of the cutaway bay and spindle work on the porch supports.

Character Defining Features
 One- story height
 Cross gable roof
 Partial porch
 Angled and square bay windows
 Double hung windows
 Variation in siding materials
 Spindle work

6. Significance
Eligibility for listing on the California Register and/or National Register is determined based on how well a given property meets one or more of the following criteria. It is not required that all four criteria are met for a resource to be considered significant. The applicable criteria are listed below

8 City of Hercules- Waterfront Park Study, Residence- 2 King Street. On file at the Hercules Historical Society. 189

Historic Resource Evaluation 9 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
with the analysis listed in italic typeface, below. Note that Criterion 1-4 refers to the California Register of Historic Places and Criterion A-D refers to the National Register of Historic Places.

Criterion 1/A Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States.

As detailed above, the Queen Anne House served as one of the first worker homes constructed to house employees of the California Powder Works and what would later become the Hercules Powder Company. The company village, that included homes and supporting uses including the clubhouse, etc, were an integral component of the plant operation. The Hercules Powder Company became one of the largest explosives plants in the United States. While the plant itself has since been dismantle, the remaining buildings and residential structures and their spatial organization serve as valuable reminders of this important time in not only California history, but also national history and trends. Taken together with the other remaining buildings and residences, the Queen Anne House is an important remnant of that historical period and is significant under Criterion 1/A as a contributor the Hercules Village National Register District. The homes and remnants are only significant under this criterion as a collective whole given that on an individual basis they are unable to communicate the significance or associations of the worker village, but as a collective whole, they can be understood and interpreted.

Criterion 2/B Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history.

This criterion applies to properties associated with individuals whose specific contributions to history can be identified and documented. Persons "significant in our past" refers to individuals whose activities are demonstrably important within a local, State, or national historic context. The criterion is generally restricted to those properties that illustrate (rather than commemorate) a person's important achievements. Properties associated with living persons are usually not eligible for inclusion in the California or National Register.

A literature search and considerable amount of coordination between the author and the Hercules Historical Society did indicate that in the 1920’s, the Robinson Family, Jovita and Ralph Robinson, along with daughters, Anita, Eleanor, and Ruth occupied the house. Later, plant engineer Eugene Woodfield and his family occupied the home. Woodfield served as mayor from 1962-1975. William Thatcher, a former Hercules employee and watchman for Valley Nitrogen Producers (which succeeded Hercules Inc. was the homes final occupant). 9 Of those tenants, Eugene (Gene) Woodfield appears to be the only one with demonstrable contributions to history, namely, he was instrumental in crafting the City’s first General Plan and creating a blueprint for how the City would evolve following the closure of the Hercules Plant ( by

9 Posedel, Images of America. 87
190

Historic Resource Evaluation 10 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
then operated by Valley Nitrogen Producers) and into the next era. After his death in 1978, the City honored him by dedicating the City’s first park and a street in his name. Accordingly, the subject residence does exhibit local significance based on its association with Eugene Woodfield who was demonstrably important in terms of local history and the Queen Anne House serves as the best representation of his productive life.

Criterion 3/C Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values The Queen Anne House was constructed in the Queen Anne cottage style and while representative of that style, does not contain a level of detail or characteristics of that style to be significant merely based on architectural merit. As such, the Queen Anne House is not individually significant under Criterion 3/C.

Criterion 4/D Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation Under this criterion a property is eligible if it has been used as a source of data and contains more, as yet retrieved data. A property is also eligible if it has not yet yielded information but, through testing or research, is determined a likely source of data. The Queen Anne House does not constitute the principal source of information, for which to deem it eligible under this criterion. As such, there is no indication that the property would be significant based on the fact that it ha s yielded or is it expected to yield information important to the prehistory or history of California or the nation.

7. Integrity
Historic Resources deemed to be significant must also be able to convey their historic significance.

The ability to do this is judged by how well the resource meets the seven aspects of integrity:

Location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. However, the individual nature of the property and its particular significance may result in certain aspects holding more weight than others. It is not required that a property retains all of its historic physical features or characteristics, rather a property must retain at the very least, those essential features which allow it to convey its significance. The essential features are those that define (1) why a property is significant and (2) when it was significant.

1. Location: Refers to the building’s original geographical location.

2. Design: Design refers to the organization of space, proportion, scale, technology, ornamentation and materials used. Design is reflective of function, technology and aesthetic trends of a respective time period. In order for integrity of design to be retained the resource should retain the original structural systems, massing, spatial arrangement, texture 191

Historic Resource Evaluation 11 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
and color of materials, detailing and arrangement and type of vegetation or, at the least, a majority of those elements.

3. Setting: Setting refers to the character of the place in which the property played its historical role. Setting often reflects the basic physical conditions under which a property was built and the functions it was intended to serve.

4. Materials: Materials are the physical elements that were combined in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property. The choice and combination of materials reveal the preferences of those who created the property and indicate the availability of particular types of materials and technologies. In order to retain integrity a property should retain the key exterior materials dating to the period of significance.

5. Workmanship: Workmanship is important because it can furnish evidence of the technology of a craft, illustrate the aesthetic principles of a historic or prehistoric period, and reveal individual, local, regional, or national applications of both technological practices and aesthetic principles.

6. Feeling: Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character.

7. Association: Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer.

The essential aspects that must be retained to convey the significance of the Queen Anne House as a contributor to the Hercules Village Historic District include location, design, feeling, and association. Originally, the subject residence was located directly behind the Powder Company Clubhouse, and clustered with other worker housing meant for upper level management. The relocation of the house to the City’s corporate yard and outside of the District effectively severed the historic relationship the home shared with the Powder Company operation and employee village.

Given that the Queen Anne House is significant based on its collective contribution as a residential home associated with the Hercules Village, it is not able to communicate such significance in isolation and would not be able to cite this criteria consideration. In its present state, the Queen Anne House retains integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, but has lost integrity of location, feeling, and association. Given that the latter three aspects are most important for the Queen Anne House to convey significance as a contributor to the District, the loss of those aspects has resulted in the resource losing integrity as a contributor to the Hercules Village . 192

Historic Resource Evaluation 12 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
While the subject building does not retain integrity based on its association with the Hercules Powder Company, it does retain enough integrity to convey its significant association with former mayor, Eugene Woodfield. A building or structure removed from its original location but which is primarily significant for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event, may still be considered to retain integrity despite its relocation. This is particularly true for resources which are relocated in an effort to avoid demolition or destruction.

As detailed in this report, not only is the building significant based on its association with Hercules Powder Company, but is also determined to be individually significant based on its association with former mayor, Eugene Woodfield, who was instrumental in shaping modern Hercules following the closure of the explosives/chemical plant. The house has been moved one-half mile from its original site, but because it is still located in a similar area and because it’s signifi cance is derived from its association with former mayor and not strictly tied to its location, it retains integrity as an individually significant resource associated with an a person demonstrably important in local history.

8. CEQA Determination
Pursuant to CEQA Section 15064.5, a historical resource is one which generally meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) or is otherwise a locally listed resource. Resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places are, by default, included on the CRHR. To qualify as a historical resource, a building must be both significant and retain a level of integrity to be able to convey that significance.

As detailed herein, t he Queen Anne House is significant both as part of a District and individually; however, it only retains enough integrity to convey its individual significance. This evaluation confirmed that the Queen Anne House is a significant resource based on its association with the Hercules Powder Company and as a representative of one of the last remaining company towns in California; nevertheless, it’s integrity and the ability to convey that significance relies on the cohesion and collection of buildings and ability to interpret their relationship and organization. The 2010 relocation of the Queen Anne House to an area removed from the other remaining Powder Company residential buildings and outside the boundaries of the District prevents the subject building from being able to convey its significance as part of the larger company town and eliminated its integrity. As a result, the Queen Anne House is no longer serves a contributor to the District.

While the Queen Anne House does not retain historic integrity as a contributor to the Hercules Village Historic District it does retain integrity as an individual resource associated with a locally significant person. Former mayor Eugene Woodfield was instrumental in guiding the evolution of Hercules into the 21st century. Because the ability to interpret a building’s significant association with an important person is less tied to the location and setting and more reliant on design, 193

Historic Resource Evaluation 13 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA
workmanship, feeling, association, the property continues to retain enough integrity to convey its significance despite its previous relocation.

As discussed under California Office of Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series #6, under most scenarios, the relocation of a historic resource, as is proposed under this project, would not be a preferred treatment; however, when undertaken in an effort to avoid demolition or destruction of the resource, it may be appropriate and the resource may remain on (or eligible for) the California Register of Historic Resources insofar as the resource is rehabilitated and maintained consistent with the SOIS, is re-located in a compatible area, and its significance is able to be interpreted.

Proposed activities, including relocation of the “Queen Anne House” to a vacant residential lot outside of the Hercules Village Historic District and rehabilitation of the residence , would therefore be exempt pursuant to CEQA Exemption 15301 which exempts the rehabilitation of damaged structures to meet current standards of public health and safety, as well, as the removal of individual small structures including single family residences. It would also be exempt pursuant to CEQA Exemption 15331, which exempts projects which maintain, repair, stabilize, rehabilitate , restore, preserve, conserve or reconstruct a historical resource in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards . Last, the proposed project is not located in a sensitive environment, would not generate cumulative impacts, there is no reasonable possibility that it would have a significant effects, is no located proximate to a scenic highway, or on a site with hazardous waste, and based on the reasons enumerated above, would not cause a substantial adverse to a historical resource.

194

Historic Resource Evaluation 14 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA

REFERENCES
Online Resources
Jennifer Posedel. “The Company Town of Hercules, Sept. 5, 2011.” http://herculeshistory.org/tag/hercules-powder-co/, Accessed Dec 8, 2017 Published Work,
Hittell, John Shertzer. The Commerce and Industries of the Pacific Coast of North America: Comprising the Rise, Progress, Products, Present Condition, and Prospects of the Useful Arts on the Western Side of Our Continent, and Some Account of Its Resources, with Elaborate Treatment of Manufactures; Briefer Consideration of Commerce, Transportation, Agriculture, and Mining; and Mention of Leading Establishments and Prominent Men in Various Departments of Business. A.L Bancroft Company, 1882.

Morton, W. Brown Ill; Hume, Gary L; Weeks, Kay D; Jandl, H. Ward, Revised by Anne E Grimer. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation & Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior. 2017.

Ojala, Cori and Kevin McGrath. Remembering Days Past, Hercules, CA 1879- 1987.

Posedel, Jennifer and Stephen Lauton with the Hercules Historical Society. Images of America:

Hercules. Arcadia Publishing: Charleston, SC. 2011

Public Records
West County Times: Oct 25, 1987; Oct 9, 1989; Feb 27, 1988; Feb 10, 1990;Dec 7, 1993.

Hercules Village National Register Nomination, NO. 80000799, 1980.

Contra Costa History Center Archives
Hercules Historical Society archives
Personal Correspondence
Victor Carniglia, in person meeting, November 30, 2017
Stephen Lawton, Hercules Historic al Society, Email Correspondence, December 5,11,12,13,14,15 2017.

195

Historic Resource Evaluation 15 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA

QUALIFICATIONS

Lilly Bianco of M-Group performed the Historic Resource Evaluation for the Hercules “ Queen Anne” House . Ms. Bianco holds a Masters in Historic Preservation and is a qualified Architectural Historian pursuant to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61. Ms. Bianco is listed as an Architectural Historian on the California Historic Resources Information Systems list of qualified consultants.

M-Group Principal, Heather Hines, oversaw the evaluation. Heather Hines is a qualified Architectural Historian pursuant to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and as def ined in the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61. Ms. Hines holds a Masters in Urban Planning and Graduate Certificate in Historic Preservation. She has 14 years of experience in the fields of historic preservation and urban planning and is listed as an Architectural Historian on the California Historic Resources Information Systems list of qualified consultants.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Site Photos

196
Attachment 1
Historic Resource Evaluation 16 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA

Front Façade , November 2017.

Side Elevation , November 2017.
197
Attachment 1
Historic Resource Evaluation 17 Queen Anne House- Hercules, CA

Rear Elevation, November 2017
Front Façade , November 2017.
198
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting