PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
conducted on
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
625 Willow Avenue
Hercules, Contra Costa County, California 94547
Apex Project No. QUA030-0313093-24013225
January 8, 2025
Prepared for:
Quarterra
492 9th Street
Oakland, California 94607
Prepared by:
Apex Companies, LLC
3480 Buskirk Avenue
Pleasant Hill, California 94523
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 Scope of Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3 Significant Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.4 Limitations and Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 User Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.6 Critical Dates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.1 Site Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Surrounding Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1 Prior Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.1 Site Reconnaissance Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.0 PHYSICAL RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.1 Physical Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.1 Historical Resources Reviewed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.2 Historical Use Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.2.1 Historical Use Summary (Site) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.2.2 Historical Use Summary (Adjoining and Surrounding Properties) . . . . . . . . . . . 19
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7.1 Environmental Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7.1.1 On-Site Listings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7.1.2 Surrounding Property Listings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7.2 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
7.3 File Review/Public Records or Database Review Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
8.0 INTERVIEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
9.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DATA GAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
10.0 NON-ASTM CONSIDERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
11.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
11.1 Environmental Professional Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
11.2 Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
11.3 Qualifications of Apex Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
12.0 TERMINOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
13.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
14.0 ACRONYMNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
TABLE OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Site Plan
Appendix B: Site Photographs
Appendix C: User Questionnaire and Title and Environmental Lien Searches Appendix D: Prior Reports
Appendix E: Historical Aerial Photographs
Appendix F: Historical Fire Insurance Maps
Appendix G: Historical Topographic Maps
Appendix H: Historical City Directories
Appendix I: Environmental Database Report
Appendix J: Agency Information and FOIA Request Responses Appendix K: Resumes
Appendix L: Physical Setting
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of the property located at 625 Willow Avenue, in Hercules, Contra Costa County, California (Site)1. This assessment was completed in accordance with Apex Proposal No. 21764332712 to Quarterra dated August 30, 2024. The scope of services was to prepare a Phase I ESA in a manner generally consistent with the ASTM International (ASTM) Standard Designation: E1527-21 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process;” the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI), 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 312; and, any exceptions, deletions, or non-scope considerations identified in the proposal.
The Site consists of one parcel of land (406-070-042-6) comprising approximately 6.25 acres and is owned by Hercules Hotel Development Group, LLC. The Site is currently undeveloped characterized by open space land use and freeway corridor, as the Site is bordered by Willow Avenue to the south, Interstate 80 to the west, Highway 4 to the north, and an Interstate 80 offramp from north to east. An apparent freshwater wetland associated with a drainage tributary was observed on the northern portion of the Site with woody canopy and wetland vegetation. In summary, the Site has remained undeveloped land since 1916.
Adjoining and surrounding properties were undeveloped land prior to the development of residential, commercial, and industrial uses along Interstate 80 to the west-northwest and Highway 4 to the north beginning in the 1950s.
This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs), historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs), or de minimis conditions in connection with the Site.
Type of Concern Finding
Recognized
Environmental
Condition (REC)
Apex did not identify RECs associated with the Site.
Controlled Recognized
Environmental
Conditions (CREC)
Apex did not identify CRECs associated with the Site.
Institutional Controls
(ICs) and/or
Engineering Controls
(ECs)
Apex did not identify ICs associated with the Site.
Apex did not identify ECs associated with the Site.
1. For purposes of this report, "Site" shall be synonymous with the ASTM E1527-21 definition of "subject property" (§3.2.88) - the property that is the subject of the Phase I ESA described in this practice.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
1 Type of Concern Finding
Historical Recognized
Environmental
Conditions (HREC)
Apex did not identify HRECs associated with the Site.
De Minimis Conditions Apex did not identify de minimis conditions associated with the Site.
Vapor Migration
In general, EPA does not regulate indoor air quality except to the extent that indoor air impacts are caused by releases of hazardous substances into subsurface soil or groundwater (vapor intrusion). ASTM E1527-21 defines “migrate” and “migration” as referring to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface. Vapor migration in the subsurface is described in ASTM E2600 – Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transaction; however, nothing in ASTM E1527-21 should be construed to require application of the ASTM E2600 standard to achieve compliance with all appropriate inquiries.
Subject to the above limitations, as part of the evaluation of the Site completed by Apex to identify RECs, the potential presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including soil vapor, was evaluated.
Apex did not identify any RECs in connection with the Site that would likely pose a vapor migration concern.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
2 Type of Concern Finding
Business
Environmental Risk
(BER)
Apex identified the following BERs associated with the Site:
• Given that the Site has been bordered by Willow Avenue to the south since at least 1939 and Interstate 80 East to Highway 4 East offramp since 1958, the possibility of aerially deposited lead (ADL) along the northern portion of the Site exists as the location of the Site is within 50 feet of the Willow Avenue Highway 80 East offramp.
• During the Site reconnaissance, non-native fill material was observed on the easement between the Site and the surrounding I-80 off ramp to the northwest and northeast. It was not clear if this non-native fill material was located on the northwest and northeast edges of the Site. Given that non-native fill material may cover the northwestern and northeastern edges of the Site, soils of the Site may contain naturally occurring asbestos (NOA).
• During the Site reconnaissance, Apex observed a concrete anchor or foundation at the southern entrance along Willow Avenue.
Concrete is considered a suspect asbestos containing material (ACM) and would need to be tested as to its asbestos content by a licensed asbestos contractor prior to the removal of the concrete anchor or foundation.
Non-ASTM
Considerations
Non-ASTM considerations were not included in this assessment's scope of services.
Significant Data Gaps Apex did not identify any significant data gaps associated with the Site.
Recommendations Given that Apex did not identify RECs at the Site, additional investigation is not recommended at this time. Due to the BERs identified on Site, testing of Site soils and the observed concrete debris will be required to manage the soil and dispose of the concrete debris prior to redevelopment.
Data Gaps Significance
Apex identified historical source gaps greater than 5-years and considers this a data gap. However, it is the Environmental Professional's opinion that based on a review of available environmental databases, historical sources, interviews, and other documentation, this data gap is not significant.
Not Significant
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
3 Data Gaps Significance
Apex has not received a response back from all government agencies and considers this a data gap. Based on the current and/or historical use of the Site and findings of this report, Apex does not consider this a significant data gap.
Not Significant
An environmental lien and AUL search was not provided by the User to Apex for review during this assessment and was not performed by Apex as part of the scope of services for this assessment. Based on the ASTM Standard requirements, Apex interprets the lack of environmental lien and AUL search as a data gap for this Phase I ESA. Based on the current and/or historical use of the Site and findings of this report, Apex does not consider this a significant data gap.
Not Significant
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
4 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) has prepared this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) of 6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot (Site2) at the request of Quarterra. The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to perform all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the Site consistent with good commercial or customary practices for a possible property transaction involving the Site and to permit Quarterra (User) to qualify for one of the landowner liability protections as identified by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).
1.2 Scope of Services
This project was completed in accordance with Apex Proposal No. 21764332712 to Quarterra dated August 30, 2024. The scope of services was to prepare a Phase I ESA in a manner generally consistent with the ASTM International (ASTM) Standard Designation: E1527-21 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process,” and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI), 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 312.
An environmental lien and/or AUL search was not included as a part of the scope of services for this assessment. As such, Apex assumes that the User of this report is evaluating this User requirement independently and will report any findings to the environmental professional.
The scope of services comprising this Phase I ESA was conducted to provide a reasonable level of investigation to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs). As defined by ASTM E1527-21 Section 3.2.73:
"recognized environmental conditions", n - (1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.
The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment, and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of the appropriate government agencies. Any controlled RECs (CRECs) or historical RECs (HRECs) as defined by ASTM E1527-21 that were identified during the assessment are discussed in this report, as applicable. Definitions of key terms within ASTM E1527-21 are included in Section 12.0.
The approved scope of services did not include any non-ASTM considerations.
2. For purposes of this report, "Site" shall be synonymous with the ASTM E1527-21 definition of "subject property" (§3.2.88) - the property that is the subject of the environmental site assessment described in this practice.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
5 1.3 Significant Assumptions
Apex has completed historical and environmental record searches in accordance with current ASTM standards and industry practices. The data, findings, and conclusions presented in this Phase I ESA are based upon a detailed search, review, and analysis of documents obtained, interviews performed, and observations made during the reconnaissance.
Phase I ESAs, such as the one performed at the Site, are of limited scope, are non-invasive, and cannot eliminate the potential that hazardous, toxic, or petroleum substances are present or have been released at the Site beyond what is identified by the limited scope of this Phase I ESA. In conducting the limited scope of services described herein, certain sources of information and public records were not reviewed.
It should be recognized that environmental concerns may be documented in public records that were not reviewed. No Phase I ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. The limitations herein must be considered when the user of this report formulates opinions as to risks associated with the site or otherwise uses the report for any other purpose. These risks may be further evaluated – but not eliminated – through additional research or assessment. We will, upon request, advise you of additional research or assessment options that may be available and associated costs.
1.4 Limitations and Exceptions
This report was prepared as a result of a contractual agreement that defined the approach and scope of services to be employed during the course of the investigation. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study have been based strictly on the results of these contracted services. The scope of this Phase I ESA is intended to aid in the evaluation of RECs. The services provided by Apex should not be construed as a warranty or guarantee that no RECs exist at the Site or that all RECs have been uncovered. No conclusions are stated or implied concerning the suitability of the Site for its eventual use. This document is not intended for purposes other than those expressly set forth herein or for use by parties other than for whom it has been prepared.
As limited by the ASTM Standard for Phase I ESAs and the scope of work provided by Apex, aside from the sampling and testing of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), if applicable, this project was non-intrusive in nature and did not include any sampling or testing of soils, groundwater, surface water, or other materials. Additionally, unless specifically described in this report, the scope of work completed by Apex explicitly excluded issues that are outside the scope of ASTM E1527-21 and may constitute a business environmental risk as defined by ASTM.
ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21 recognizes inherent limitations for Phase I ESAs, including, but not limited to:
• Uncertainty Not Eliminated - No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a Site. Performance of this practice is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs, and this practice recognizes reasonable limits of time and cost.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
6 • Not Exhaustive - All Appropriate Inquiry does not mean an exhaustive assessment of a Site.
There is a point at which the cost of information obtained, or the time required to gather it outweighs the usefulness of the information and, in fact, may be a material detriment to the orderly completion of transactions.
• Level of Inquiry Is Variable - Not every Site will warrant the same level of assessment. Consistent with good commercial or customary practice, the appropriate level of environmental site assessment will be guided by the type of Site, the expertise and risk tolerance of the User, and the information developed in the course of the inquiry. • Comparison with Subsequent Inquiry - It should not be concluded or assumed that an inquiry was not All Appropriate Inquiries merely because the inquiry did not identify RECs in connection with a Site. Phase I ESAs must be evaluated based on the reasonableness of judgments made at the time and under the circumstances in which they were made. Subsequent Phase I ESAs should not be considered valid standards to judge the appropriateness of any prior assessment based on hindsight, new information, use of developing technology or analytical techniques, or other factors.
• Point in Time - The Phase I ESA is based upon conditions at the time of completion of the individual Phase I ESA elements: User's Responsibilities, Physical Setting Resources, Government Records, Historical Records, Site Reconnaissance, Owner/Operator/Occupant Interviews, Local Government Officials Interviews, and Evaluation/Reporting.
In general, EPA does not regulate indoor air quality except to the extent that indoor air impacts are caused by releases of hazardous substances into subsurface soil or groundwater (vapor intrusion). ASTM E1527-21 Section 3.2.53 defines “migrate” and “migration” as referring to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface. Vapor migration in the subsurface is described in Guide E2600 – Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transaction; however, nothing in ASTM E1527-21 requires application of the Guide E2600 standard to achieve compliance with all appropriate inquiries.
1.5 User Reliance
This report documents the Phase I ESA of the Site performed by Apex at the explicit request and direction of Quarterra and in general accordance with ASTM E1527-21 and the US EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, 40 CFR 312. The findings, opinions, and conclusions of this Phase I ESA are for the confidential and exclusive use of Quarterra, its affiliates, employees, agents, successors, and assigns. Reliance on this report for any use or by parties other than specifically stated is prohibited without the expressed written consent of Apex and Quarterra, and such use is at the sole risk of the user.
Continued viability of this report is subject to ASTM E1527-21 Section 4.6 and Section 4.8. If the Phase I ESA will be used by a different user (third party) than the user for whom the Phase I ESA was originally prepared, the third party must also satisfy the user’s responsibilities in Section 6 of ASTM E1527-21.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
7 1.6 Critical Dates
A Phase I ESA meeting or exceeding this practice and completed less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition of the property or (for transactions not involving an acquisition) the date of the intended transaction, is presumed to be valid. A Phase I ESA meeting or exceeding this practice and for which the information was collected or updated within one year prior to the date of the intended transaction may be used provided that the following components of the ESA were conducted or updated within 180 days of the date of purchase or the date of the intended transaction:
• Interviews with owners, operators, and occupants;
• Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens;
• Reviews of federal, tribal, state, and local government records; • Visual inspections of the property and of adjoining properties; and, • The declaration by the Environmental Professional responsible for the assessment or update.
The date of this report generally may not represent the date the individual components of All Appropriate Inquiries were completed and should not be used when evaluating compliance with the 180-day or 1-year all appropriate inquiries requirements.
Critical Dates
Item Date
Earliest date of interviews with owners, operators, and/or occupants N/A Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens N/A
Reviews of federal, tribal, state, and local government records December 12, 2024
Visual inspections of the property and of adjoining properties December 11, 2024
The declaration by the Environmental Professional responsible for the Phase I ESA or update
January 8, 2025
The effective date of this report (earliest of the above-listed dates) is December 11, 2024; therefore, per ASTM E1527-21 the expiration date of this report is June 9, 2025 (effective date plus 180 calendar days).
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
8 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
2.1 Site Description
A summary of the Site and nearby properties is included in the following table. A Site Location Map is provided as Figure 1, a Site Plan is included as Figure 2, and a Surrounding Properties Map is provided as Figure 3. Photographs of the Site and adjoining properties are included as Appendix B.
Site Description
Site Address 625 Willow Avenue
Hercules, Contra Costa County, California 94547
Current Use of Site 6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot, Vacant
Zoning New Town Center (NTC)
Site Improvements The Site is currently undeveloped characterized by open space land use and freeway corridor, as the Site is bordered by Willow Avenue to the south, Interstate 80 to the west, Highway 4 to the north, and an Interstate 80 offramp from north to east. An apparent freshwater wetland associated with a drainage tributary was observed on the northern portion of the Site with woody canopy and wetland vegetation.
Site Operations No operations conducted on the Site.
Site Contacts Pranay Mowji, Representative for Hercules Hotel Development Group, LLC
Site Acreage 6.25 acres
Number of Parcels One
Tax ID / Parcel Number(s) 406-070-042-6
Current Property
Owner(s)
Hercules Hotel Development Group, LLC
Utility Providers
Although no utilities are provided at the Site, the following utilities are provided in the vicinity of the Site:
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
9 Utility Providers
Utility Provider
Electric Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)
Natural Gas PG&E
Potable Water East Bay Municipal Utilities District
Sanitary Sewer City of Hercules
2.2 Surrounding Properties
Surrounding properties generally consist of commercial properties.
Adjoining and Nearby Properties
Direction Description
North Interstate 80 offramp and John Muir Parkway (Route 4) West Interstate 80, followed by a retail shopping center with a Safeway Fueling Station, addressed as 4000 San Pablo Avenue
South Willow Avenue, followed by railroad tracks and retail shopping center East Interstate 80 offramp, followed by the Hercules Transit Center bus station Apex’s review of adjoining and surrounding property uses did not identify any uses that are indicative of a REC to the Site.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
10 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
ASTM E1527-21 Section 3.2.94 defines “User” as the party seeking to use Practice E1527-21 to complete a Phase I ESA of a property. Apex understands that Quarterra is the User as defined by ASTM E1527-21.
ASTM E1527-21 specifies that certain tasks associated with identifying potential RECs at the Site should be performed by the User and provided to the Environmental Professional (i.e., User Responsibilities).
Accordingly, Apex provided a User Questionnaire to Quarterra requesting the above information. Quarterra provided the User Questionnaire to Mr. Pranay Mowji, representative of the Site owner, who completed the User Questionnaire.
The completed questionnaire was returned to Apex and a copy is provided in Appendix C. Provided information is summarized in the table below.
USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
Data Type Information Provided
Environmental Liens, AUL,
Title Records
The User did not identify any environmental liens or AULs. An environmental lien or AUL search was not included as a part of the scope for this assessment.
Specialized User
Knowledge
The User did not provide specialized knowledge regarding the Site.
Commonly Known or
Reasonably Ascertainable
Information
The User did not provide any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information material to RECs other than that in the client-provided documents, which are included in the appendices, and summarized below.
Valuation Reduction for
Environmental Issues
The User did not identify a valuation reduction of the Site for environmental issues.
Reason for Performing
Phase I ESA
Acquisition
Other User Provided
Information
The User provided prior report which is summarized below.
3.1 Prior Reports
Prior report(s) are briefly summarized in the table below and a copy is included in Appendix D.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
11 Prior Report Summary
Report Author Date
Phase I ESA Ground Zone Environmental
Services
January 27, 2020
Ground Zone Environmental Services (Ground Zone) reported that the Site at the time of this 2020 Phase I ESA was open space and drainage swale. In addition, no use of hazardous waste or disposal at the Site was identified. Ground Zone identified no RECs, HRECs, or CRECs in connection with the Site. Although no RECs, HRECs, or CRECs were identified, three potential impacts of concern were reported by Ground Zone. These three impacts of concern included the possibility of aerially deposited lead (ADL) along the northern portion of the Site as the location of the Site is within 50 feet of Willow Avenue and Highway 80 East to Highway 4 East offramp; the possibility of naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) located in the soils of the Site; and part of a concrete anchor or foundation was observed which may contain asbestos. Ground Zone recommended conducting soil sampling for lead and NOA within all areas planned for excavation and testing the concrete anchor or foundation for its asbestos content prior to removal.
Apex considers these three impacts of concern discussed by Ground Zone as business environmental risks (BERs).
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
12 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
4.1 Site Reconnaissance Observations
The reconnaissance was conducted on December 11, 2024 by Apex representative Dan Hisey and consisted of a walk-through of exterior areas of the Site. Apex was provided access by Caroline Layden but was unaccompanied during the reconnaissance.
Apex was provided access to all areas of the Site.
A summary of reconnaissance observations is provided in the table below. Representative site photographs are provided in Appendix B.
Site Reconnaissance Summary
Observation Observed Comments
Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Storage
Hazardous Substances and/
or Petroleum Products
No Apex did not observe any hazardous substances and/or petroleum products.
Aboveground Storage
Tanks (ASTs)
No Apex did not observe any obvious indications of ASTs during the course of this Phase I ESA.
Underground Storage Tanks
(USTs)
No Apex did not observe any obvious indications of USTs during the course of this Phase I ESA.
Leaks, Spills, or Releases
Around ASTs, USTs, and/or
Chemical Storage Areas
No Apex did not observe any significant leaks, spills, or releases.
Drums, Totes, and
Intermediate Bulk
Containers
No Apex did not observe any drums or other containers.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs)
No Apex did not observe any potential sources of PCBs.
It should be noted that ASTM E1527-21 excludes
consideration of fluorescent light ballasts.
Transformers No Apex did not observe any pad-mounted, pole-mounted, or dry-type transformers.
Hydraulic Equipment No Apex did not observe any hydraulic equipment.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
13 Site Reconnaissance Summary
Observation Observed Comments
Water/Wastewater
Wastewater Treatment and/
or Septic Systems
No Apex did not observe any wastewater treatment or septic systems.
Floor Drains or Sumps No Apex did not observe any floor drains or sumps.
Oil-Water Separators
(OWS) or Grease Traps
No Apex did not observe any oil-water separators (OWS) or grease traps.
Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons No Apex did not observe any pits, ponds, or lagoons.
Catch Basins and
Stormwater Drainage
Yes Storm water is directed via the following conveyance systems:
• Sheet flow
Storm water is released to nearby natural waterways.
Wells (including dry wells,
irrigation wells, injection
wells, monitoring wells,
abandoned wells, or other
wells)
No Apex did not observe any wells.
Other Observations
Stressed Vegetation or
Stained Soil
No Apex did not observe any stressed vegetation or stained soil.
Stains or Corrosion on
Floors, Walls, or Ceilings
No Apex did not observe any significantly stained or corroded floors, walls, or drains.
Strong, Pungent, or Noxious
Odors
No Apex did not observe any unusual odors.
Pipes of Unknown Origin or
Use
No Apex did not observe any pipes of unknown origin or use.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
14 Site Reconnaissance Summary
Observation Observed Comments
Fill Material Yes Apex observed evidence of fill material located on the northwestern and northeastern edges of the Site. This fill material was observed as soil stockpiles used for the
development of the I-80 off ramp to the northwest and
northeast of the Site.
Solid Waste Yes Monolithic anchor or foundation at the southern entrance to the Site near Willow Avenue.
REC Summary
On-Site Observations REC
Summary
No Based on the site reconnaissance, Apex did not identify any items of environmental concern indicative of RECs, CREC, HRECs, or de minimis conditions at the Site. Apex considers the monolithic anchor or foundation observed at the southern entrance to the Site near Willow Avenue a BER.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
15 5.0 PHYSICAL RECORDS REVIEW
5.1 Physical Setting
Sources consulted to characterize the physical setting of the Site are referenced herein.
Physical Setting Summary
Data Type Data Source Comments
Topography /
Slope
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
7.5-minute Topographic Map,
Mare Island, California, dated
2021.
According to the USGS topographic maps
dated 2021, the Site is situated at an
elevation of approximately 45 to 65 feet
above mean sea level and slopes moderately
to the west. Regional topography slopes
moderately to the northwest toward San
Pablo Bay.
Presumed
Groundwater
Flow Direction
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
7.5-minute Topographic
Map, Mare Island, California,
dated 2021.
Based on topography, the groundwater flow
beneath the Site is presumed to flow to the
northwest.
Estimated Depth
to Groundwater
Geotracker Water Boards
California Government - online
portal
Groundwater is estimated to be between
approximately 2 and 8 feet below ground
surface (bgs) in the vicinity of the Site.
Soils U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS)
Web Soil Survey (WSS) as
provided by ERIS in their
database report.
Based on the soil survey, the following soil
types were identified at the Site:
• Sehorn clay, well drained, 15 to 30
percent slopes. These soils are
described as well drained with high
runoff potential when thoroughly
wet. Water transmission through
the soil is restricted or very
restricted. The parent material
consists of residuum weathered
from shale.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
16 Physical Setting Summary
Data Type Data Source Comments
Geology ERIS Physical Setting Report
(PSR), dated December 12, 2024.
Based on the geologic source, the Site is
underlain by the Miocene marine rocks from
the Oligocene to Pliocene age described as
sandstone, shale, siltstone, conglomerate,
and breccia.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
17 6.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW
6.1 Historical Resources Reviewed
Apex retained Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) to provide readily available historical sources including aerial photographs (Appendix E), fire insurance maps (Appendix F), topographic maps (Appendix G), and city directories (Appendix H) for the Site and surrounding properties. Copies of these historical sources are provided in the referenced appendices and are further discussed in the tables below.
ASTM E1527-21 Section 8.3.1 requires the Environmental Professional to evaluate historical property information and developing a history of the previous uses of the Site, adjoining properties, and surrounding area is to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the Site. Further, ASTM requires that all obvious uses of the Site shall be identified from the present, back to the Site’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. The term “developed use” includes agricultural uses and placement of fill dirt, and other uses that may not involve structures.
Apex has excluded listings from city directories that the Environmental Professional has deemed not significant to the evaluation of the Site.
Historical Sources
Historical Resource Years Reviewed
Aerial Photographs 1939, 1948, 1958, 1968, 1971, 1980, 1988, 1993, 2003, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022
Topographic Maps 1916, 1942, 1949, 1951, 1959, 1968, 1980, 2015, 2018, and 2021 Fire Insurance Maps (FIMs) No Coverage
City Directories 1956, 1960, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1991, 1996, 2001, 2003, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, and 2023
6.2 Historical Use Summary
6.2.1 Historical Use Summary (Site)
Historical Summary (Site)
Date Range
(Decade) Site Use Site
1910s Undeveloped The 1916 topographic map depicts the Site as undeveloped land.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
18 Historical Summary (Site)
Date Range
(Decade) Site Use Site
1930s Undeveloped The 1939 aerial photograph depicts the Site as open space grassy area rolling hills with an apparent depression and areas of higher order vegetation and ponding on the
northeastern portion.
1940s Undeveloped The 1948 aerial photograph depicts the Site as unchanged from the 1930s.
1950s Undeveloped The 1958 aerial photograph depicts the Site with the depressional area on the northeastern portion now
channelized across the Site with a culvert passing below the newly constructed Highway 80 to the west.
1960s Undeveloped The 1968 aerial photograph depicts the Site as essentially unchanged from the 1950s.
1970s Undeveloped The 1971 aerial photograph depicts the Site as essentially unchanged from the 1960s.
1980s Undeveloped The 1980 and 1988 aerial photographs depict the Site as essentially unchanged from the 1970s.
1990s Undeveloped The 1993 aerial photograph depicts the Site as essentially unchanged from the 1980s.
2000s Undeveloped The 2003, 2005, and 2009 aerial photographs depict the Site as essentially unchanged from the 1990s.
2010s Undeveloped The 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018 aerial photographs depict the Site as essentially unchanged from the 2000s. 2020s Undeveloped The 2020 and 2022 aerial photographs depict the Site as essentially unchanged from the 2000s.
In summary, the Site has remained undeveloped land since 1916.
6.2.2 Historical Use Summary (Adjoining and Surrounding Properties)
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
19 Historical Summary (Adjoining and Surrounding)
Date Range
(Decade) Adjoining Surrounding
1910s An intermittent stream was apparent to
the north and west of the Site. Willow
Avenue was apparent to the south,
beyond which was railroad tracks.
Undeveloped land was apparent to the
east.
Undeveloped land is depicted to the north
and east. Undeveloped land and a
railroad tracks are apparent to the south.
Residential structures are located to the
west.
1930s Essentially unchanged from the 1910s. Essentially unchanged from the 1910s. 1940s Essentially unchanged from the 1930s. Essentially unchanged from the 1930s. 1950s Interstate 80 is depicted to the
west-northwest. The Interstate 80
offramp is apparent to the north and east.
Willow Avenue and railroad tracks are
depicted to the south.
Highway 4 is depicted further to the north.
Smaller buildings appear to the east and
south of the Site.
1960s Essentially unchanged from the 1950s. Additional buildings are apparent throughout a quarter mile radius of the
Site.
1970s Essentially unchanged from the 1960s. Essentially unchanged from the 1960s. 1980s Essentially unchanged from the 1970s. Development of a retail shopping center is apparent beyond Willow Avenue and
railroad tracks to the south. Residential
development is apparent beyond
Highway 4 to the northeast.
1990s Essentially unchanged from the 1980s. Commercial development is apparent to the east and southeast of the Site.
2000s Essentially unchanged from the 1990s,
except for the development of the transit
center to the east.
Parking and commercial development is
apparent beyond Interstate 80 to the
west.
2010s Essentially unchanged from the 2000s. Essentially unchanged from the 2000s.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
20 Historical Summary (Adjoining and Surrounding)
Date Range
(Decade) Adjoining Surrounding
2020s Essentially unchanged from the 2010s. Essentially unchanged from the 2010s, except for further commercial
development apparent beyond Interstate
80 to the west.
Adjoining and surrounding properties were undeveloped land prior to the development of residential, commercial, and industrial uses along Interstate 80 to the west-northwest and Highway 4 to the north beginning in the 1950s.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
21 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW
7.1 Environmental Records
Consistent with ASTM E1527-21, customary and usual practices, specific scope of work terms and conditions (see Section 1.2), and contractual terms and conditions, Apex obtained and reviewed environmental databases and records to characterize the obvious and apparent uses of the Site and nearby properties. Apex retained ERIS to provide a database and record search report, provided in Appendix I. Apex has reviewed the listings pertaining to the Site and nearby properties and evaluated whether these listings should be considered RECs, CRECs, HRECs, vapor conditions, and/or de minimis conditions. RECs, CRECs, HRECs, vapor conditions, and/or de minimis conditions are also specifically listed in the Executive Summary and Section 9.0.
Based on the Environmental Professional's review of the databases and resulting opinion, only the following significant and relevant database and record search findings are included for discussion below.
Due to the volume of listings for the surrounding properties only listings which, in the opinion of the Environmental Professional, warrant discussion. The remaining listings are included in the appended database report.
Note: Names and Addresses listed in the table(s) below reflect the data imported from the ERIS report.
The ERIS report is populated by the various governmental databases. Spelling errors or incomplete information, if present, reflect the actual regulatory record; therefore, Apex did not correct these items.
7.1.1 On-Site Listings
The Site was not listed on any significant or relevant database and search records findings.
7.1.2 Surrounding Property Listings
Several properties surrounding the Site were identified in relevant or significant databases. Apex has reviewed the listings to evaluate their potential to impact the Site. Pertinent listings are summarized in the table below with details in the listing discussion table that follows.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
22 Surrounding Properties Summary
Database Site Name Address
Elev.
diff.
(ft)
Dist.
(mi) /
Dir. Comments
CHMIRS CALTRANS EB 80
BETWEEN
HIGHWAY 4
AND WILLOW
AVE,
HERCULES, CA
-8 0.01/
W
Spill of 175 gallons of
diesel fuel on Interstate
80 East reported on
October 17, 1995. The
spill was reportedly on
Interstate 80, cleaned
up, and is not
considered a REC.
CHMIRS CHP GG EB 80 TO EB 4
CONNECTOR,
HERCULES, CA
-16 0.01/
NE
Further discussed
below.
CHMIRS CALTRANS OAKLAND I-80 EB AT EB 4
TRANSITION,
HERCULES, CA
-16 0.01/
NE
Spill of 10 gallons of
diesel fuel from the
saddle tank of a FedEx
truck on February 26,
2010. Substance was
contained to a plastic
pool and asphalt area,
and is not considered a
REC.
CHMIRS CAL TRANS WB 4 TO EB 80
CONNECTOR
RAMP,
HERCULES, CA
-16 0.01/
NE
Spill of 1 pound of
carbon graphite 299 on
Highway 4 on April 16,
2002. The spill was
cleaned up and is not
considered a REC.
CHMIRS ASHBY LUMBER HIGHWAY 80
EB AT
JUNCTION TO
HIGHWAY 4
-16 0.01/
NE
Spill of 30 10-ounce
containers of
construction adhesive.
This spill was
reportedly limited to the
side of the road,
cleaned up by the
responsible party, and
is not considered a
REC.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
23 Database Site Name Address
Elev.
diff.
(ft)
Dist.
(mi) /
Dir. Comments
HIST CHMIRS I-80, 2MI E/SR4,
HERCULES, CA
-16 0.01/
NE
Spill of an alkaline
liquid from a vehicle
collision/overturn on
February 28, 1989.
Given the substance
and the surface spill
nature of this incident,
Apex does not consider
this spill a REC.
RCRA SQG,
FINDS/FRS, HAZ
GEN
CALTRANS I-80 AND I-4
SEPARATION
TO 1.2 KM W
OF CARQUINEZ
BRIDGE,
HERCULES, CA
-16 0.01/
NE
No violation or reported
releases associated
with this listing. Not
considered a REC.
CHMIRS CONTRA COSTA CHP WB 80 AT
WILLOW AVE.,
HERCULES, CA
-26 0.01/
WSW
Spill of 1 gallon of
gasoline during a traffic
accident on February
27, 2000. Reportedly,
gasoline leaked from
car's gas tank into a
storm drain. Given that
this spill occurred on
the westbound side of
I-80, Apex does not
consider this spill a
REC.
CHMIRS CALTRANS WILLOW RD.
AT I-80,
HERCULES, CA
-26 0.01/
WSW
Spill of 20 gallons of
hydraulic fluid occurred
on January 11, 2007
after a hose broke on a
piece of equipment on
the road. The spill site
was reported as the
road with no water
impacted. Given that no
water was impacted
and the spill was
cleaned up, this spill is
not considered a REC.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
24 Database Site Name Address
Elev.
diff.
(ft)
Dist.
(mi) /
Dir. Comments
CHMIRS CALTRANS EB 80 EAST OF
WILLOW,
HERCULES, CA
-26 0.01/
WSW
Spill of 60 gallons of
diesel fuel on the
shoulder of I-80 EB on
July 12, 1996.
According to the
database, Erickson
Company cleaned up
the spill, and no further
investigation was
completed. Not
considered a REC.
HAZNET, HAZ
GEN
PACIFIC GAS &
ELECTRIC - FRANKLIN
STA
1213
BAYBERRY,
HERCULES,
CA, 945470000
-25.0 0.02/
WSW
No releases or spills
identified. Not
considered a REC.
CUPA
CONTRACO,
CERS HAZ,
RCRA NON GEN
BIG LOTS HERCULES
1957
1551
SYCAMORE
AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
3.0 0.09/
SSW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
RCRA SQG,
CUPA
CONTRACO,
DRYCLEANERS,
CERS HAZ,
EMISSIONS,
RCRA NON
GEN, FED
DRYCLEANERS
CREEKSIDE CLEANERS 1511
SYCAMORE
AVE, STE G,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-7.0 0.10/
SSW
No reported releases or
spills identified. Based
on assumed direction
of groundwater flow,
this site is
hydrogeologically down
gradient from the Site
and is not considered a
REC.
CUPA
CONTRACO,
CERS HAZ
HERCULES RT INC 1511
SYCAMORE
AVE STE D,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-7.0 0.10/
SSW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
RCRA NON GEN PIPE0006 1511
SYCAMORE
AVENUE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-7.0 0.10/
SSW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
25 Database Site Name Address
Elev.
diff.
(ft)
Dist.
(mi) /
Dir. Comments
CUPA
CONTRACO,
CERS HAZ,
EMISSIONS,
RCRA SQG
THE HOME DEPOT
STORE #1044, AT&T
MOBILITY - RITE AID
HERCULES (USID47399)
1625
SYCAMORE
AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
38.0 0.11/
SSE
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
CALSITES CENTEX HOMES OF
CALIFORNIA
I-80 AND
SYCAMORE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94572
-23.0 0.11/
WSW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
RCRA NON GEN HERCULES PET CLINIC 1511 B
SYCAMORE
AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547-0000
-25.0 0.12/
SW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
RCRA NON
GEN, CUPA
CONTRACO,
CERS HAZ
SAFEWAY #2874 4080 SAN
PABLO AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-28.0 0.12/
WNW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
CUPA
CONTRACO,
RCRA NON
GEN, CERS
TANK, UST
SAFEWAY FUEL
CENTER #2874
4000 SAN
PABLO AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-31.0 0.12/
W
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
CALSITES GELSAR SAN PABLO
AVENUE/
SYCAMORE
AVENUE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-31.0 0.12/
W
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
CUPA
CONTRACO,
CERS TANK,
UST, RCRA NON
GEN,
EMISSIONS,
LUST
HERCULES SHELL,
T-MOBILE WEST CORP/
BA01338A
3900 SAN
PABLO AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-24.0 0.14/
W
Discussed below.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
26 Database Site Name Address
Elev.
diff.
(ft)
Dist.
(mi) /
Dir. Comments
CUPA
CONTRACO,
DELISTED HAZ
JACK IN THE BOX 3800 SAN
PABLO AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-21.0 0.14/
WSW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
RCRA NON
GEN, VCP, HIST
CORTESE,
ENVIROSTOR,
HWSS
CLEANUP,
CALSITES
LCRI INVESTMENTS LLC,
GELSAR, HERCULES
INC,
NW CORNER
OF SYCAMORE
AVE AND SAN
PABLO AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-28.0 0.15/
W
Discussed below.
CUPA
CONTRACO
TACO BELL 41365 1541
SYCAMORE
AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
-34.0 0.16/
SW
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
CUPA
CONTRACO,
EMISSIONS
T-MOBILE WEST CORP/
BA01317A, CITY OF
HERCULES CITY HALL
111 CIVIC DR,
HERCULES,
CA, 94547
47.0 0.17/
SE
No violations or
releases reported. Not
considered a REC.
LUST, HHSS,
HIST TANK, UST
SWEEPS
CALTRANS HERCULES
MAINTENANCE STATION
1369
BAYBERRY
AVE,
HERCULES,
CA, 94572
-5.0 0.19/
ESE
Discussed below.
Facility Name: CHP GG
Facility Address: EB 80 TO EB 4 CONNECTOR, HERCULES, CA Distance/Direction: 0.01/NE
Database(s): CHMIRS
According to the CHMIRS database, a spill of 4 gallons of diesel fuel was reported on the connector road between Interstate 80 East and Highway 4 East, which is located approximately 100 feet to the northwest of the Site, on October 2, 2010. This spill was reportedly caused by a vehicle accident and the substance flowed into a storm drain. No indication of where the storm drain released water to. Cal Trans was reported as the cleanup agency. Given Cal Trans reported as the cleanup agency and the absence of additional information regarding further investigation into this spill, Apex does not consider this diesel fuel spill a REC.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
27 Orphan Facilities
Orphan facilities are those facilities that could not be mapped due to incomplete or incorrect address/ geocoding information.
The environmental database report identified a total of 22 orphan facilities.
These facilities were reviewed and determined to not be within the vicinity of the Site.
7.2 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations Search Environmental liens and Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) can commonly be found within recorded land title records (e.g., County Recorder/Registry of Deeds). The types of title reports that may disclose environmental liens and AULs include Preliminary Title Reports, Title Commitments, Condition of Title, and Title Abstracts. Chain-of-title reports will not normally disclose environmental liens or AULs that are imposed by judicial authorities may be recorded or filed in judicial records only.
Reviewing land title records for AULs and environmental liens (or judicial records where applicable) is a user responsibility. Apex notes the following:
Were the results of the User’s search for
environmental liens and AULS received?
No
Were environmental liens and AULS noted in the
User-provided search results?
No
An environmental lien and/or AUL search was not included as a part of the scope of services for this assessment. As such, Apex assumes that the User of this report is evaluating this User requirement independently and will report any findings to the environmental professional.
7.3 File Review/Public Records or Database Review Summary Per ASTM E1527-21, if the Site or any of the adjoining properties are identified on one or more of the standard environmental record sources then reasonably ascertainable pertinent regulatory files and/ or records associated with the listing should be reviewed in order to obtain sufficient information to assist in determining if a REC, CREC, HREC, or de minimis condition exists in connection with the Site. If, in the Environmental Professional’s opinion, such a review is not warranted, the justification for not conducting the regulatory file review must be provided. As an alternative, information from other sources (for example, online regulatory databases, on-site records, User provided records, records from local government agencies, interviews with regulatory officials, or interviews with other individuals knowledgeable about the Site may be reviewed.
It is the Environmental Professional's opinion that a file review is not warranted based on the following reasons: distance and/or hydrologic orientation of environmental concerns relative to the Site; known or suspected groundwater flow direction; and regulatory status.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
28 Apex contacted agencies as summarized in the table below for public information requests including open records and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Copies of pertinent open record and FOIA responses and records of communication are provided in Appendix J.
Information obtained via the below listed file reviews for Site and adjoining properties regulatory listings is discussed in detail above in Section 7.1.
File Review/Public Records or Database Review Summary
Agency Summary
Contra Costa Health
Hazardous Materials
Program
Apex submitted a FOIA request to the Contra Costa Health Hazardous Materials Programs on December 31, 2024. No response was received by the date of the issuance of this report. If files which are determined to be significant to the report findings are obtained, Apex will provide these findings to the User.
Rodeo-Hercules Fire
Protection District
Apex submitted a FOIA request to Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District on December 31, 2024. No response was received by the date of the issuance of this report. If files which are determined to be significant to the report findings are obtained, Apex will provide these findings to the User.
State Water Resources
Control Board Geotracker
data management system
Apex reviewed pertinent files of surrounding properties on the State Water Resources Control Board Geotracker website. Information obtained on the Geotracker website are included in the appropriate sections of this report.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
29 8.0 INTERVIEWS
Apex performed interviews with individual(s) knowledgeable about the Site and adjoining property uses, as summarized in the table below.
Interviews
Name Title/Company Date Comments
Pranay Mowji Owner Representative January 14,
2025
Mr. Mowji completed the User
Questionnaire and provided it to
Apex on January 14, 2025, which
was discussed in Section 3.0 of
this report. Additional information
provided by Mr. Mowji is provided
in the appropriate sections of this
report.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
30 9.0 FINDINGS, OPINIONS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DATA GAPS
Apex has performed a Phase I ESA of 6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot, which is described in Section
2.0 of this report. This project was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Designation: E1527-21 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process,” the USEPA’s Standards and Practices for AAI, 40 CFR, Part 312, and additional terms and conditions required by contract with Quarterra. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.0 of this report.
This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs), historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs), or de minimis conditions in connection with the Site.
Type of Concern Finding
Recognized
Environmental
Condition (REC)
Apex did not identify RECs associated with the Site.
Controlled Recognized
Environmental
Conditions (CREC)
Apex did not identify CRECs associated with the Site.
Institutional Controls
(ICs) and/or
Engineering Controls
(ECs)
Apex did not identify ICs associated with the Site.
Apex did not identify ECs associated with the Site.
Historical Recognized
Environmental
Conditions (HREC)
Apex did not identify HRECs associated with the Site.
De Minimis Conditions Apex did not identify de minimis conditions associated with the Site.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
31 Type of Concern Finding
Vapor Migration
In general, EPA does not regulate indoor air quality except to the extent that indoor air impacts are caused by releases of hazardous substances into subsurface soil or groundwater (vapor intrusion). ASTM E1527-21 defines “migrate” and “migration” as referring to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface. Vapor migration in the subsurface is described in ASTM E2600 – Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transaction; however, nothing in ASTM E1527-21 should be construed to require application of the ASTM E2600 standard to achieve compliance with all appropriate inquiries.
Subject to the above limitations, as part of the evaluation of the Site completed by Apex to identify RECs, the potential presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including soil vapor, was evaluated.
Apex did not identify any RECs in connection with the Site that would likely pose a vapor migration concern.
Business
Environmental Risk
(BER)
Apex identified the following BERs associated with the Site:
• Given that the Site has been bordered by Willow Avenue to the south since at least 1939 and Interstate 80 East to Highway 4 East offramp since 1958, the possibility of aerially deposited lead (ADL) along the northern portion of the Site exists as the location of the Site is within 50 feet of the Willow Avenue Highway 80 East offramp.
• During the Site reconnaissance, non-native fill material was observed on the easement between the Site and the surrounding I-80 off ramp to the northwest and northeast. It was not clear if this non-native fill material was located on the northwest and northeast edges of the Site. Given that non-native fill material may cover the northwestern and northeastern edges of the Site, soils of the Site may contain naturally occurring asbestos (NOA).
• During the Site reconnaissance, Apex observed a concrete anchor or foundation at the southern entrance along Willow Avenue.
Concrete is considered a suspect asbestos containing material (ACM) and would need to be tested as to its asbestos content by a licensed asbestos contractor prior to the removal of the concrete anchor or foundation.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
32 Type of Concern Finding
Non-ASTM
Considerations
Non-ASTM considerations were not included in this assessment's scope of services.
Significant Data Gaps Apex did not identify any significant data gaps associated with the Site.
Recommendations Given that Apex did not identify RECs at the Site, additional investigation is not recommended at this time. Due to the BERs identified on Site, testing of Site soils and the observed concrete debris will be required to manage the soil and dispose of the concrete debris prior to redevelopment.
Data Gaps
The ASTM Standard requires that the report identify the following: 1) obvious uses of the Site since 1940 or first development, whichever is earlier; and 2) significant “data gaps” which affect the ability of the Environmental Professional to identify RECs. A data gap by itself is not inherently significant. Apex identified the following data gaps in this assessment:
Data Gaps Significance
Apex identified historical source gaps greater than 5-years and considers this a data gap. However, it is the Environmental Professional's opinion that based on a review of available environmental databases, historical sources, interviews, and other documentation, this data gap is not significant.
Not Significant
Apex has not received a response back from all government agencies and considers this a data gap. Based on the current and/or historical use of the Site and findings of this report, Apex does not consider this a significant data gap.
Not Significant
An environmental lien and AUL search was not provided by the User to Apex for review during this assessment and was not performed by Apex as part of the scope of services for this assessment. Based on the ASTM Standard requirements, Apex interprets the lack of environmental lien and AUL search as a data gap for this Phase I ESA. Based on the current and/or historical use of the Site and findings of this report, Apex does not consider this a significant data gap.
Not Significant
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
33 10.0 NON-ASTM CONSIDERATIONS
An evaluation of “Non-ASTM” issues was not included in the scope of services for this assessment.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
34 11.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS
11.1 Environmental Professional Statement
I, Suzanne Nase, declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312, and I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Site. I have developed and performed All Appropriate Inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Suzanne Nase
Senior Project Scientist/Environmental Professional
January 8, 2025
11.2 Signatures
Report Author
Dan Hisey
Client Program Manager
Signature for Unknown User
Unknown User
11.3 Qualifications of Apex Personnel
Qualifications for Apex personnel responsible for the completion of this report are included in Appendix K.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
35 12.0 TERMINOLOGY
Note: references in this section refer to ASTM E1527-21. abandoned property, n—property that can be presumed to be deserted, or an intent to relinquish possession or control can be inferred from the general disrepair or lack of activity thereon such that a reasonable person could believe that there was an intent on the part of the current owner to surrender rights to the property.
activity and use limitations (AULs), n—legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility: (1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and/or surface water on the property, or (2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment.
These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls, are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and/or surface water on a property. actual knowledge, n—knowledge actually possessed by an individual who is a real person, rather than an entity. Actual knowledge is to be distinguished from constructive knowledge that is knowledge imputed to an individual or entity.
adjoining properties, n—any real property or properties the border of which is contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the Site, or that would be contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the Site but for a street, road, or other public thoroughfare separating them. aerial photographs, n—photographs taken from an aerial platform with sufficient resolution to allow identification of development and activities.
all appropriate inquiries, n—that inquiry constituting all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the Site consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined in CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(35)(B) and 40 C.F.R. Part 312, that will qualify a party to a commercial real estate transaction for one of the threshold criteria for satisfying the LLPs to CERCLA liability (42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(35)(A) & (B), § 9607(b)(3), § 9607(q), and § 9607(r)), assuming compliance with other elements of the defense.
approximate minimum search distance, n—the area for which records must be obtained and reviewed pursuant to Section 8 subject to the limitations provided in that section. This may include areas outside the Site and shall be measured from the nearest Site boundary. This term is used in lieu of radius to include irregularly shaped properties.
bona fide prospective purchaser [42 U.S.C. § 9607(r)], n—a person may qualify as a bona fide prospective purchaser if, among other requirements, such person made “all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the facility in accordance with generally accepted good commercial and
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
36 customary standards and practices.” Knowledge of contamination resulting from all appropriate inquiries would not generally preclude this liability protection. A person must make all appropriate inquiries on or before the date of purchase. The facility must have been purchased after January 11, 2002.
Brownfields Amendments, n—amendments to CERCLA pursuant to the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, Pub. L. No. 107 - 118 (2002), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. building department records, n—those records of the local government in which the Site is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on a property. business environmental risk (BER), n—a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally – driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of commercial real estate, not necessarily related to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice. Consideration of BER issues may involve addressing one (or more) non-scope considerations. commercial real estate, n—any real property except a dwelling or property with no more than four dwelling units exclusively for residential use (except that a dwelling or property with no more than four dwelling units exclusively for residential use is included in this term when it has a commercial function, as in the construction of such dwellings for profit). This term includes but is not limited to undeveloped real property and real property used for industrial, retail, office, agricultural, other commercial, medical, or educational purposes; property used for residential purposes that has more than four residential dwelling units; and property with no more than four dwelling units for residential use when it has a commercial function, as in the building of such dwellings for profit. commercial real estate transaction, n—a transfer of title to or possession of real property or receipt of a security interest in real property, except that it does not include transfer of title to or possession of real property or the receipt of a security interest in real property with respect to an individual dwelling or building containing fewer than five dwelling units, nor does it include the purchase of a lot or lots to construct a dwelling for occupancy by a purchaser, but a commercial real estate transaction does include real property purchased or leased by persons or entities in the business of constructing or developing dwelling units. construction debris, n—concrete, brick, asphalt, and other such building materials discarded in the construction of a building or other improvement to property. contaminated public wells, n—public wells used for drinking water that have been designated by a government entity as contaminated by hazardous substances (for example, chlorinated solvents) or petroleum products, or as having water unsafe to drink without treatment. contiguous property owner [42 U.S.C. § 9607(q)], n—a person may qualify for the contiguous property owner liability protection if, among other requirements, such person owns real property that is contiguous to, and that is or may be contaminated by hazardous substances from other real property that is not owned by that person. Furthermore, such person conducted all appropriate inquiries at the time of acquisition of the Site and did not know or have reason to know that the Site was or could be contaminated by a release or threatened release from the contiguous property. The all appropriate inquiries must not result in knowledge of contamination. If it does, then such person did “know” or “had reason to know” of contamination and would not be eligible for the contiguous property owner liability protection.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
37 controlled recognized environmental condition, n—recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).
data failure, n—failure to achieve the historical research objective in 8.3.1 even after reviewing the standard historical resources in 8.3.4.1 through 8.3.4.8 that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. Data failure is one type of data gap.
data gap, n—a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice, including, but not limited to, site reconnaissance (for example, an inability to conduct the site visit), and interviews (for example, an inability to interview the key site manager, regulatory officials, etc.). See 12.6.
de minimis condition, n—a condition related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. A condition determined to be a de minimis condition is not a recognized environmental condition nor a controlled recognized environmental condition. demolition debris, n—concrete, brick, asphalt, and other such building materials discarded in the demolition of a building or other improvement to a property. drum, n—a container (typically, but not necessarily, holding 55 gal (208 L) of liquid) that may be used to store hazardous substances or petroleum products.
dry wells, n—underground areas where soil has been removed and replaced with pea gravel, coarse sand, or large rocks. Dry wells are used for drainage, to control storm runoff, for the collection of spilled liquids (intentional and nonintentional), and wastewater disposal (often illegal). due diligence, n—the process of inquiring into the environmental characteristics of commercial real estate or other conditions, usually in connection with a commercial real estate transaction. The degree and kind of due diligence vary for different properties, and differing purposes. dwelling, n—structure or portion thereof used for residential habitation. engineering controls, n—physical modifications to a site or facility (for example, capping, slurry walls, or point of use water treatment) to reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on a property. Engineering controls are a type of activity and use limitation (AUL).
environment, n—environment shall have the same meaning as the definition of environment in CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601(8)). For additional background information, see Legal Appendix (Appendix X1) to X1.1.1 “Releases or Threatened Releases.”
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
38 environmental compliance audit, n—the investigative process to determine if the operations of an existing facility are in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. This term should not be used to describe this practice, although an environmental compliance audit may include an environmental site assessment or, if prior audits are available, may be part of an environmental site assessment.
environmental lien, n—a charge, security, or encumbrance upon title to a property to secure the payment of a cost, damage, debt, obligation, or duty arising out of response actions, cleanup, or other remediation of hazardous substances or petroleum products upon a property, including (but not limited to) liens imposed pursuant to CERCLA 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(1) & 9607(r) and similar state or local laws. environmental professional, n—a person meeting the education, training, and experience requirements as set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 312.10(b). For the convenience of the reader, this section is reprinted in Appendix X2. The person may be an independent contractor or an employee of the user. environmental site assessment (ESA), n—the process by which a person or entity seeks to determine if a subject property is subject to recognized environmental conditions. At the option of the user, an environmental site assessment may include more inquiry than that constituting all appropriate inquiries or, if the user is not concerned about qualifying for the LLPs, less inquiry than that constituting all appropriate inquiries. An environmental site assessment is both different from and often less rigorous than an environmental compliance audit.
ERNS list, n—EPA’s emergency response notification system list of reported CERCLA hazardous substance releases or spills in quantities greater than the reportable quantity, as maintained at the National Response Center. Notification requirements for such releases or spills are codified in 40 C.F.R. Parts 302 and 355.
fill dirt, n—dirt, soil, sand, or other earth, that is obtained off - site, that is used to fill holes or depressions, create mounds, or otherwise artificially change the grade or elevation of real property. It does not include material that is used in limited quantities for normal landscaping activities. fire insurance maps (FIMs), n—maps originally produced for fire insurance purposes that indicate uses of properties at specified dates.
good faith, n—absence of any intention to seek an unfair advantage or to defraud another party; an honest and sincere intention to fulfill one’s obligations in the conduct or transaction concerned. hazardous substance, n—a substance defined as a hazardous substance pursuant to CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), as interpreted by EPA regulations and the courts: “(A) any substance designated pursuant to section 1321(b)(2)(A) of Title 33, (B) any element, compound, mixture, solution, or substance designated pursuant to section 9602 of this title, (C) any hazardous waste having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to section 3001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6921) (but not including any waste the regulation of which under RCRA (42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.) has been suspended by Act of Congress), (D) any toxic pollutant listed under section 1317(a) of Title 33, (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7412), and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which the Administrator (of EPA) has taken action pursuant to section 2606 of Title 15. The term does not include
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
39 petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under subparagraphs (A) through (F) of this paragraph, and the term does not include natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, or synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas).” (See Appendix X1.) hazardous waste, n—any hazardous waste having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to section 3001 of RCRA, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6921) (but not including any waste the regulation of which under RCRA (42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 - 6992k) has been suspended by Act of Congress). RCRA is sometimes also identified as the Solid Waste Disposal Act. RCRA defines a hazardous waste, at 42 U.S.C. § 6903, as: “a solid waste, or combination of solid wastes, which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics may: (A) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness, or (B) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of, or otherwise managed.” hazardous waste/contaminated sites, n—sites on which a release has occurred, or is suspected to have occurred, of any hazardous substance, hazardous waste, or petroleum products, and that release or suspected release has been reported to a government entity. historical recognized environmental condition, n—a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the Site that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the Site to any controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations). A historical recognized environmental condition is not a recognized environmental condition. For examples of historical recognized environmental conditions, see Appendix X4.
IC/EC registries, n—databases of institutional controls or engineering controls that may be maintained by a federal, state, or local environmental agency for purposes of tracking sites that may contain residual contamination and AULs. The names for these may vary from program to program and state to state, and include terms such as, but not limited to the following: Declaration of Environmental Use Restriction database (Arizona), Land Use Restriction Sites (California Department of Toxic Substances Control), Sites with Deed Restrictions (California State Water Resources Control Board), Environmental Covenant List (Washington), Sites With Environmental Covenants and Use Restrictions (Colorado), Institutional Control Registry (Indiana), Environmental Site Tracking and Research Tool (Missouri), and the Pennsylvania Activity and Use Limitation (PA AUL) Registry.
innocent landowner [42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(35) & 9607(b)(3)], n—a person may qualify as one of three types of innocent landowners: (1) a person who “did not know and had no reason to know” that contamination existed on the Site at the time the purchaser acquired the Site; (2) a government entity which acquired the Site by escheat, or through any other involuntary transfer or acquisition, or through the exercise of eminent domain authority by purchase or condemnation; or, (3) a person who “acquired the facility by inheritance or bequest.” To qualify for the innocent landowner defense, such person must have made all appropriate inquiries on or before the date of purchase. Furthermore, the all appropriate inquiries must not have resulted in knowledge of the contamination. If it does, then such person did “know” or “had reason to know” of contamination and would not be eligible for the innocent landowner defense. See Appendix X1 for the other necessary requirements that are beyond the scope of this practice.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
40 institutional controls (IC), n—a legal or administrative mechanism (for example, “deed restrictions,” restrictive covenants, easements, or zoning) on the use of, or access to, a site or facility to (1) reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property, or (2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. An institutional control is a type of activity and use limitation (AUL). interviews, n—those portions of this practice that are conducted to gather information from an individual or individuals in person, by telephone, in writing, or via other electronic media to meet the objectives of this practice.
key site manager, n—the person identified by the owner or operator of a Site as having good knowledge of the uses and physical characteristics of the Site. See 10.5.1. land title records, n—records that affect the title of real estate, which may include, among other things, deeds, mortgages, leases, land contracts, court orders, easements, liens, and AULs recorded within the recording systems or land registration systems created by state statute in every state and ordinarily administered in the local jurisdiction (usually the county) in which the Site is located, and available by performing a title search. Such records are publicly accessible, though the process of performing a title search to find land title records often requires specialized expertise or knowledge of the local system (see
5.4 – AULs and Environmental Liens in Land Title Records). Information about the title to the Site that is filed or stored in any place other than where land title records are, by law or custom, recorded for the local jurisdiction in which the Site is located, are not considered land title records. landfill, n—a place, location, tract of land, area, or premises used for the disposal of solid wastes as defined by state solid waste regulations. The term is synonymous with the term solid waste disposal site and is also known as a garbage dump, trash dump, or similar term. landowner liability protections (LLPs), n—a defense to CERCLA available to bona fide prospective purchasers, contiguous property owners, and innocent landowners. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(35)(A), 9601(40), 9607(q), and 9607(r).
local government agencies, n—those agencies of municipal or county government having jurisdiction over the Site. Municipal and county government agencies include but are not limited to cities, parishes, townships, and similar entities.
local street directories, n—directories published by private or government entities that list the occupant(s) of a specific address at the time the occupant data were collected, typically within a year of the publication date of the directory.
major occupants, n—those tenants, subtenants, or other persons or entities each of which uses at least 40 % of the leasable area of the Site or any anchor tenant when the Site is a shopping center. material safety data sheet (MSDS), n—see safety data sheet.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
41 material threat, n—obvious threat which is likely to lead to a release and that, in the opinion of the environmental professional, would likely result in impact to public health or the environment. An example might include an aboveground storage tank system that contains a hazardous substance and which shows evidence of damage. The damage would represent a material threat if it is deemed serious enough that it may cause or contribute to tank integrity failure with a release of contents to the environment. migrate/migration, v/n—for the purposes of this practice, “migrate” and “migration” refers to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including, for example, solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface.
National Priorities List (NPL), n—list compiled by EPA pursuant to CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9605(a)(8)(B) of sites with the highest priority for cleanup pursuant to EPA’s Hazard Ranking System. See 40 C.F.R. Part 300.
obvious, adj—that which is plain or evident; a condition or fact that could not be ignored or overlooked by a reasonable observer.
occupants, n—those tenants, subtenants, or other persons or entities using a property or a portion of a property.
operator, n—person responsible for the overall operation of a facility. other historical resources, n—any resource other than those designated in 8.3.4.1 through 8.3.4.8 that are credible to a reasonable person and that identify past uses of properties. See 8.3.4.9. owner, n—generally the fee owner of record of a property. petroleum exclusion, n—the exclusion from CERCLA liability provided in 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), as interpreted by the courts and EPA: “The term (hazardous substance) does not include petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under subparagraphs (A) through (F) of this paragraph, and the term does not include natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, or synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas).”
petroleum products, n—those substances included within the meaning of the petroleum exclusion to CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), as interpreted by the courts and EPA, that is: petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under Subparagraphs (A) through (F) of 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, and synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas). (The word fraction refers to certain distillates of crude oil, including gasoline, kerosene, diesel oil, jet fuels, and fuel oil, pursuant to Standard Definitions of Petroleum Statistics.) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, n—the process described in this practice. physical setting sources, n—resources that provide information about the geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, or topographic characteristics of the area that includes the Site. See 8.2.1.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
42 pits, ponds, or lagoons, n—manmade or natural depressions in a ground surface that are likely to hold liquids or sludge containing hazardous substances or petroleum products. The likelihood of such liquids or sludge being present is determined by evidence of factors associated with the pit, pond, or lagoon, including, but not limited to, discolored water, distressed vegetation, or the presence of an obvious wastewater discharge.
practically reviewable, adj—information that is practically reviewable means that the information is provided by the source in a manner and in a form that, upon examination, yields information relevant to the Site without the need for extraordinary analysis of irrelevant data. The form of the information shall be such that the user can review the records for a limited geographic area. Records that cannot be feasibly retrieved by reference to the location of the Site or a geographic area in which the Site is located are not generally practically reviewable. Most databases of public records are practically reviewable if they can be obtained from the source agency by the county, city, zip code, or other geographic area of the facilities listed in the record system. Records that are sorted, filed, organized, or maintained by the source agency only chronologically are not generally practically reviewable. Listings in publicly available records which do not have adequate address information to be located geographically are not generally considered practically reviewable. For large databases with numerous records (such as RCRA hazardous waste generators and registered underground storage tanks), the records are not practically reviewable unless they can be obtained from the source agency in the smaller geographic area of zip codes. Even when information is provided by zip code for some large databases, it is common for an unmanageable number of sites to be identified within a given zip code. In these cases, it is not necessary to review the impact of all of the sites that are likely to be listed in any given zip code because that information would not be practically reviewable. In other words, when so much information is generated that it cannot be feasibly reviewed regarding its impact on the Site, it is not practically reviewable. property, n—real property, including buildings and other fixtures and improvements located on and affixed to the land.
property use limitation, n—limitation or restriction on current or future use of a property in connection with a response to a release, in accordance with the applicable regulatory authority or authorities that allows hazardous substances or petroleum products to remain in place at concentrations exceeding unrestricted use criteria.
property tax files, n—files kept for property tax purposes by the local jurisdiction which may include records of past ownership, appraisals, maps, sketches, photographs, or other information. publicly available, adj—information that is publicly available means that the source of the information allows access to the information by anyone upon request.
RCRA generators, n—those persons or entities that generate hazardous wastes, as defined and regulated by RCRA.
RCRA TSD facilities, n—those facilities on which treatment, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous wastes takes place, as defined and regulated by RCRA.
reasonably ascertainable, adj—information that is (1) publicly available, (2) obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints, and (3) practically reviewable.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
43 recognized environmental conditions, n—(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Site due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Site due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Site under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. records review, n—that part that is contained in Section 8 of this practice that addresses which records shall or may be reviewed.
release, n/v—a release of any hazardous substance or petroleum product shall have the same meaning as the definition of “release” in CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22). There are a number of statutory exclusions from the definition of release that may impact the environmental professional’s opinions and conclusions, such as the normal application of fertilizer. For additional background information, see Legal Appendix (Appendix X1) to X1.1.1 “Releases and Threatened Releases.” report, n—written report prepared by the environmental professional and constituting part of a “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,” as required by this practice. safety data sheets, n—written or printed material that is prepared by chemical manufacturers and importers for distributors’ and employers’ use that provides comprehensive information regarding a hazardous chemical pursuant to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200. significant data gap, n—a data gap that affects the ability of the environmental professional to identify a recognized environmental condition. See 12.6.2.
site reconnaissance, n—that part that is contained in Section 9 of this practice and addresses what should be done in connection with the site visit. The site reconnaissance includes, but is not limited to, the site visit done in connection with such a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. site visit, n—the visit to the Site during which observations are made constituting the site reconnaissance section of this practice.
solid waste disposal site, n—a place, location, tract of land, area, or premises used for the disposal of solid wastes as defined by state solid waste regulations. The term is synonymous with the term landfill and is also known as a Garbage dump, trash dump, or similar term. solvent, n—a chemical compound that is capable of dissolving another substance and may itself be a hazardous substance, used in a number of manufacturing/industrial processes including but not limited to the manufacture of paints and coatings for industrial and household purposes, equipment clean - up, and surface degreasing in metal fabricating industries.
standard environmental record sources, n—those records specified in 8.2.2. standard historical resources, n—those resources of information about the history of uses of properties specified in 8.3.4.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
44 standard physical setting resources, n—recent USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent) showing contour lines and the area on which the Site is located, and site - specific physical setting information obtained pursuant to agency file reviews. See 8.2.1. standard practice, n—the activities set forth in ASTM E1527-21. standard sources, n—sources of environmental, physical setting, or historical records specified in Section 8 of this practice.
site, n—the property that is the subject of the environmental site assessment described in this practice. sump, n—pit, cistern, cesspool, or similar receptacle where liquids drain, collect, or are stored. topographic map, n—graphic representation delineating natural and man - made features of an area or region in a way that shows their relative positions and elevations.
TSD facility, n—treatment, storage, or disposal facility. See 3.2.71. underground injection, n—the emplacement or discharge of fluids into the subsurface by means of a well, improved sinkhole, sewage drain hole, subsurface fluid distribution system or other system, or groundwater point source.
underground storage tank (UST), n—any tank, including underground piping connected to the tank, that is or has been used to contain hazardous substances or petroleum products and the volume of which is 10 % or more beneath the surface of the ground.
user, n—the party seeking to use Practice E1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the Site.
USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, n—USGS Topographic Map, including the current US Topo 7.5 – Minute Series or the historical 7.5 - Minute Topographic Series, which is available from the United States Geologic Survey and showing the Site.
visually and/or physically observed, v—during a site visit pursuant to this practice, this term means observations made by visual, auditory, or olfactory means while performing the site reconnaissance. wastewater, n—water that (1) is or has been used in an industrial or manufacturing process, (2) conveys or has conveyed sewage, or (3) is directly related to manufacturing, processing, or raw materials storage areas at an industrial plant. Wastewater does not include water originating on or passing through or adjacent to a site, such as stormwater flows, that has not been used in industrial or manufacturing processes, has not been combined with sewage, or is not directly related to manufacturing, processing, or raw materials storage areas at an industrial plant.
zoning/land use records, n—those records of the local government of areas encompassing the Site indicating the uses permitted by the local government in particular zones within its jurisdiction. The records may consist of maps or written records.
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
45 13.0 REFERENCES
The following reference materials were used during the course of this Phase I ESA:
References
Document Type Author Date Document Name
ASTM Standard ASTM International
(ASTM)
2021 Standard Practice
for Environmental
Site Assessments: Pha
se I Environmental
Site Assessment
Process E1527-21
Aerial
Photographs
ERIS December 16, 2024 N/A
Fire Insurance
Maps
ERIS December 12, 2024 N/A
Topographic
Maps
ERIS December 12, 2024 N/A
Database Report ERIS December 12, 2024 N/A
Physical Setting
Report
ERIS December 12, 2024 N/A
City Directories ERIS December 18, 2024 N/A
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
46 14.0 ACRONYMNS
Apex - Apex Companies, LLC
AULs - Activity and Use Limitations
BGS - below grade surface
CERCLA - Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.)
CERCLIS - Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System C.F.R. - Code of Federal Regulations
CREC - Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition
EC - Engineering Control
EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPCRA - Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (also known as SARA Title III), 42 U.S.C. §§ 11001 - 11050 et seq.
ERNS - emergency response notification system
ESA - environmental site assessment
FR - Federal Register
HREC - Historical Recognized Environmental Condition
IC - Institutional Control
LLP - Landowner Liability Protections under the Brownfields Amendments LPST - Leaking petroleum storage tank
LUST - Leaking underground storage tank
µg/L - micrograms per liter
µg/m3 - micrograms per cubic meter (of air)
mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
NCP - National Contingency Plan
NFRAP - Sites where no further remedial action is planned under CERCLA
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
47 NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL - National Priorities List
PCBs - Polychlorinated biphenyls
RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.) REC - Recognized Environmental Condition
RCRA - Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (amendment to CERCLA).
TSDF - hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility U.S.C. - United States Code
USGS - United States Geological Survey
UST - Underground Storage Tank
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
48 Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Site Plan
Appendix B: Site Photographs
1 - View of the Site from the south facing north.
2 - Concrete anchor located on the southern
portion of the Site.
3 - Western edge of the Site from the southwest
facing northeast.
Quarterra
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot,
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
1 4 - Solid waste located on the western edge of
the Site.
5 - View of the Site from the northwest facing
southeast.
6 - Northern edge of the Site.
Quarterra
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot,
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
2 7 - Northeastern portion of the Site.
8 - View of the Site from the north facing south.
9 - Storm drainage creek located on the northern
end of the Site.
Quarterra
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot,
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
3 10 - Another view of the storm water drainage
creek located on the northern end of the Site.
11 - Northeastern end of the Site.
12 - Southeastern edge of the Site.
Quarterra
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot,
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
4 13 - View of the Site from the southeast facing
northwest.
14 - View of the Site from the east facing west.
15 - View of the Site on the southern end from the
east facing west.
Quarterra
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot,
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
5 16 - View of the Site from the south facing north.
17 - Railroad tracks located beyond Willow
Avenue to the south.
18 - Interstate 80 offramp to Willow Avenue
located to the east of the Site.
Quarterra
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot,
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
6 19 - Home Depot located beyond Willow Avenue
and railroad tracks to the south.
20 - Interstate 80 overpass over Willow Avenue
located to the southwest.
21 - Hercules Transit Center located to the east of
the Site.
Quarterra
6.25-Acre Undeveloped Lot,
Hercules, California
January 8, 2025
QUA030-0313093-24013225
7 Appendix C: User Questionnaire
and Title and Environmental
Lien Searches
ASTM E1527-21 USER QUESTIONNAIRE
Site Name: _________________________________________
Site Address: _________________________________________ Respondent Name: _________________________________________ Respondent Title/Company: _________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________
For Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the "Brownfields Amendments", 40 CFR Part 312), the user must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that "all appropriate inquiry" is not complete, and the environmental professional may identify a “data gap” which could impact the Phase I ESA report findings.
Question: Yes No
1. Environmental Liens
Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? Check the box below as appropriate.
The scope of work for this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) includes a search of recorded environmental liens as an added-scope item (in accordance with ASTM E1527-21 Section 6.2).
2. Activity and Land Use Limitations (AULs)
Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? Check the box below as appropriate.
The scope of work for this Phase I ESA includes a search of recorded AULs as an addedscope item (in accordance with ASTM E1527-21 Section 6.2).
3. Specialized Knowledge or Experience
Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business?
4. Purchase Price vs. Fair Market Value
Does the purchase price being paid for this property reflect any adjustments from the fair market value of the property? (If you conclude that the value is lower than the fair market price, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property?)
5. Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases?
5a. Do you know the past uses of the property?
5b. Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or were once were present at the property?
5c. Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? 5d. Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property?
6. Obviousness of the Presence or Likely Presence of Contamination Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property?
PLEASE PROVIDE EXPLANATION FOR ALL “YES” ANSWERS, OR ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS.
Appendix D: Prior Reports
Page
i of 24
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Hercules Hotel Complex
Prepared For:
Hercules Hotel Development LLC
1365 Murchison Drive
Millbrae, CA 94030
Prepared By:
1361 B Street
Hayward, Ca 94541
www.GroundZoneES.com
(510) 582-4212
January 27, 2020
i
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, we have meet the definition of Environmental professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
I declare that this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) was prepared in accordance with ASTM Standard E1527-13, and consistent with Ground Zone Environmental Services, LLC (Ground Zone) December 5, 2019 Scope of Work for Consultant Services to Address California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Requirements for Hercules Hotel Complex (Ground Zone , December 5, 2019). Every reasonable effort was undertaken to collect and review readily available information relating to potential environmental risks present at the Site. Ground Zone does not warrant the accuracy or veracity of information obtained through third party sources.
Sam Brathwaite, P.G., CEG, Chg
President, Ground Zone
Environmental Services, LLC
ii
Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 3
2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................ 3
2.2 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................................................... 6
2.3 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 7
3.0 HISTORICAL LAND USE .......................................................................................................................... 11
3.1 DIRECTORY LISTINGS ................................................................................................................................. 11
3.2 HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS ............................................................................................................... 11
3.3 HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS .............................................................................................................. 12
3.4 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS .............................................................................................................. 12
3.5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCH ............................................................................................................... 13
3.5.1 File Reviews ........................................................................................................................................... 13
3.5.2 EDR 1-Mile Radius Database Findings................................................................................................. 16
4.0 CURRENT LAND USE ............................................................................................................................... 18
4.1 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .............................................................................................................................. 18
4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................................. 19
5.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................. 20
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 20
7.0 LIMITATIONS............................................................................................................................................. 21
8.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 23 List of Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location
Figure 2 – Site Plan
Figure 3 – USGS Topographical Map
Figure 4 – Geotracker Map
List of Tables
Table 1 – Summary of Historic Aerial Photograph Findings Table 2 – Summary of Historic Topographical Map Findings Table 3 – Summary of Current Environmental Database Listings within ¼ Mile Table 4 – Summary of Findings from the Site Reconnaissance Survey Table 5 – Findings and Recommendations Summary
iii
List of Appendices
Appendix A – EDR Radius Report with Geocheck
Appendix B – Geology Maps
Appendix C – USGS Web Soil Survey
Appendix D – City Directory Listings
Appendix E – Historic Aerial Photographs
Appendix F – Historical Topo Maps
Appendix G – Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Search Results
Appendix H - City of Hercules Planning, Building & Public Works Department Appendix I - City of Hercules Fire Department
Appendix J - Bay Area Air Quality Control District
Appendix K - Contra Costa County Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs Appendix L - San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board—GeoTracker Database Appendix M – Site Reconnaissance Photo Log
Appendix N – Environmental Questionnaire
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Ground Zone Environmental Services, LLC. (Ground Zone) is pleased to present this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) for Contra Costa County Assessor’s Parcel Number 406 070 042, California (Site) to Hercules Hotel Development (HHD). The purpose of the proposed development Project is to implement building and Site maintenance, building system upgrades and capital improvements (Project).
This Phase I was performed to assess recognized environmental conditions at the Site for potential future real estate transaction. This Phase I provides preliminary information on potential environmental liabilities associated with historic and current operations at the Site.
This Phase I was conducted by Ground Zone in accordance with its Scope of Work for Consultant Services to Address California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Requirements for Hercules Hotel Complex (Ground Zone, December 5, 2019) and in accordance with the following industry standards and regulations:
ASTM Standard E1527-13 (Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process)1
;
40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312;
22 California Code of Regulations §69200; and,
California Health and Safety Code §25570.2 (f).
The purpose of this Phase I report is to assess the potential risks posed by hazardous materials at the Project area to environmental resources and human health, and to Site for the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) as defined by American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. ASTM E1527-13 defines a REC as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term REC is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.
Two additional types of RECs are included in the revised ASTM publication, including Historical RECs (HREC) and Controlled RECs (CREC). An HREC is defined by ASTM E1527- 13 as a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, or meeting unrestricted-use criteria established by the regulatory authority without subjecting the property to any required controls. A CREC is defined by ASTM as an REC resulting from a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that was addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (as evidenced by a no further
action [NFA] letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by the regulatory authority) with hazardous substances and/or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (i.e. property-use restrictions, activity and use limitations (AULs), institutional controls, or engineering controls).
As part of the Phase I, an all appropriate inquiries (AAI) was conducted in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency “Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries” (40 CFR Part 312.20). The AAI must be included as part of the process of evaluating a property’s environmental conditions and assessing potential liability for any contamination. The intention of the Phase I is to identify potential issues that may impact the Project with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601) and petroleum products.
The approach adopted by Ground Zone to meet this objective includes:
A review of historical land use information, interviews and a survey with the property manager/owner in order to confirm current and previous land uses; A database search to evaluate the nature of hazardous material use at the Site and the likelihood of hazardous material impact to the Site; and, A Site reconnaissance which included a review of the Site and surrounding properties to confirm the presence and location of RECs or HRECs at the Site or nearby sites identified within the database.
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Background information considered relevant to this Phase I includes a Project description, Site description, physical setting, and the Site geology and hydrogeology.
2.1 Project Description
Hercules Hotel Development LLC plans to construct a 100-unit 4-story hotel and s 6-story office building complex at the Site. The Site location is showed in Figure 1 and the Site plan is shown in Figure 2.
2.2 Site Description
The subject Property is located in the City of Hercules along the east side of Interstate Highway 80 (I-80) within the loop ramp to westbound Willow Avenue. The highway itself was constructed circa 1958 or during the window (1950-1958). Before this, the Property was part of open rolling hills with an intermittent channel/drainage swale, apparently the remnant of the historic tributary to Refugio Creek to the South.
The Site layout is shown in Figure 2.
2.3 Physical Setting
The subject Site is located in the northeasterly portion of the San Francisco Bay area near the City of Richmond on San Pablo Bay and in the city limits of Hercules in Contra Costa County, California. This Site encompasses the location of the Hercules Hotel Complex property that included approximately 8.5 acres of rolling hill and drainage ditch waterway terrain within the Refugio Creek Valley (Figure 3). This low-lying valley trends in a westerly-easterly direction and is in the proximity where Refugio Creek discharges its intermittent flows into the San Pablo Bay.
2.3.1 Topography
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2018 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map of Mare Island, California was provided is shown in Figure 3. The average elevation of the Project area is approximately 65 ft. above mean sea level (AMSL).
The regional drainage is moderately sloped from east to west with a topographic flow direction to the west, as indicated in the Project’s Radius Map Report with GeoCheck (Environmental Data Resources [EDR] 2019) (see Appendix A).
2.1.2 Regional Geology
The Site is located within the Refugio Creek Valley a land feature sloping easterly to westerly covered mostly by exposed Quaternary aged alluvium, estuarine sediments, and manmade artificial fill materials. Older Tertiary aged bedrock underlies these younger sediments and consists of sandstones and shale - both being low to intermediate grade metamorphic units.
Bedrock located to the north is composed of Briones Sandstone and Hercules Shale. These sandstones are mostly massive and indurated by heat, and therefore lacking significant fracturing. Shale consists of closely fractured siltstone and claystone with interbedded lenses of sandstone with local fracturing.
The sandstones are covered by Tertiary gravels, sand and clayey materials in upland areas located northerly of the valley. Characteristics of the bedrock located to the south of the Site includes older Hambre Sandstone overlain by younger Rodeo Shale. In this area the sandstone is massive to thickly bedded and moderately to closely fractured. The Shale is also closely fractured but thinly bedded. These materials underlie the low grassy hills located immediately adjacent to the valley.
The bedrock underlying the valley is overlain by highly plastic silty clays mixed with varying amounts of organics and sand lenses. These materials represent a portion of the bay muds also exposed at the surface on tidal flats located to the north and are between 10 to 40 feet thick.
Across the Site materials exposed at the surface are composed of alluvium and manmade fill between 5 to 10 feet thick. Fill is moderately to well compacted engineered material composed of gravel, sand and fines with varying amounts of organic material. Alluvium consists mostly of fine-grained clay and silt with varying amounts of clayey sand and minor lenses of well sorted sands and gravels. At the surface these materials are soft or loose but become more compact and denser with increasing depth.
The Regional Geologic Map provided in Appendix B, Geologic Map of California, Santa Rosa Sheet (Koenig 1963).
The Radius Map Report with GeoCheck (EDR 2019) also provided geologic information in the general area of the Project corridor, which was identified as a stratified sequence of the Cenozoic era, quaternary system and series.
2.3 Geology and Hydrogeology
2.3.1 Local Geology and Soils
The subsurface soils in the Project area generally consist of marine and non-marine continental sedimentary rocks. Pleistocene-Holocene-aged alluvium consists of unconsolidated and semi consolidated fine-grained sediments. The unconsolidated sediments consist of clays, silts, and sands, with a thickness ranging up to 1,000 feet or more. These sediments are semi-continuous throughout the Bay and are usually referred to as “Old Bay Mud.” Younger, fine-grained alluvial and estuarine deposits (Young Bay Mud) overlay the Old Bay Mud. The younger, fine-grained alluvium is typically a mixture of interbedded stiff clays, silts, gravel, and sands derived from the hills or deposited during the formation of the San Francisco Bay.
The Radius Map Report with GeoCheck (EDR 2019) (Appendix A) provided native soil composition information in the general area of the Project corridor, which was identified as Sehorn clay comprised of Class D very slow infiltrating soils with high water table; the soils are clay from 0-25 inches, silty clay from 25 to 35 inches, and unweathered bedrock at 38 inches.
Also use Web Soil Survey.
The other major soil type identified was Clear Lake clay comprised of clay from 0 to 59 inches with very slow infiltration rates, high water table, and poorly drained. The last soil type identified is Tierra loam, also Class D and moderately well drained with loam from 0 to 25 inches, clay from 25 to 59 inches, and silty clay loam from 59 to 70 inches.
Natural Resources Conservation Service’s (NRCS) January 6, 2010 Web Soil Survey confirms soil type Clear Lake clay with 0 to 15 percent slopes, covers 1.5 acres of the Site or 15.5 percent; and Sehorn clay with 15 to 30 percent slopes covering 8 acres of the Site or 84.5% of the site. (NRCS 2020). NRCS Web Soil Survey is provided in Appendix C.
2.3.2 Naturally Occurring Asbestos
Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA) is present all over the state of California — the state rock serpentine contains NOA. Asbestos minerals belong to either the serpentine mineral group or the amphibole mineral group. The most common type of asbestos found in California is chrysotile, a serpentine mineral. A review of the General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos (California Geological Survey [CGS] 2000) indicated that NOA was not mapped on, or in the near vicinity of, the Project area.
However, because the Site was observed to contain large stockpiles of fill soil from an unknown source, NOA remains a risk at the Site due to regional NOA geology. (See Appendix B for Geology Map).
2.3.3 Surface and Groundwater Hydrology
Hydrology and hydrogeology located across and beneath the property is mainly a function of climatic fluctuations within the Refugio Creek watershed area and tidal fluctuations of the San Francisco Bay. The Project area is located within the San Pablo Creek-Frontal San Pablo Bay Estuaries watershed and the Pinole Creek-Frontal San Pablo Bay Estuaries subwatershed. The site receives19.36 inches of rain per year on average (Caltrans 2020).
Intermittent flows within the Refugio Creek channel located along the northerly side of the valley are directed in a westerly direction from elevated terrain located to the east. Most of these waters are emptied into San Pablo Bay to the west of the Site but small portions do infiltrate into the subsurface thus adding to underlying ground water resources. During the winter season portions of surface water flows pond in low lying depressions, artificial surface dikes, drainage ditches, and channels through the valley. Past measurements of ground water depth and gradient indicate that its direction of flow generally follows the topography of the surrounding highland features and floor of the valley westerly (Geosolutions 2003).
Underlying bedrock appears to have both a low primary permeability and highly variable secondary permeability that is due mostly to fractures. Across the Site and within the valley area, ground water in the bedrock arrives mostly after infiltrating through overlying alluvium that has been placed by erosional processes. In elevated terrain located to the east of the site, ground water enters the subsurface through the mantle of regolith located across the ground surface.
Overall these ground waters migrate in a westerly direction towards and into the bay. Within limits of the Refugio Creek valley the ground water becomes increasingly brackish to saline from south to north and east to west with the highest concentration being near to the San Pablo Bay (Geosolutions 2003).
The East Bay Plain sub-basin is a northwest trending alluvial plain bounded on the north by the San Pablo Bay, on the east by Franciscan Basement rock, on the south by the Niles Cone Groundwater Basin, and on the west by the San Francisco Bay (DWR 2004). The East Bay Plain sub-basin extends beneath the San Francisco Bay to the west (DWR 2004).
The East Bay Plain sub-basin aquifer system consists of unconsolidated sediments from of Quaternary age (DWR 2004). Deposits include the early-Pleistocene Santa Clara Formation, the late-Pleistocene Alameda Formation, the early-Holocene Temescal Formation, and Artificial Fill (DWR 2004). The Santa Clara Formation consists of alluvial fan deposits inter-fingered with lake, swamp, river channel, and floodplain deposits (DWR 2004). The Alameda Formation includes a sequence of alluvial fan deposits bounded by mud deposits on the top and bottom of the formation (DWR 2004). The Temescal Formation is an alluvial deposit consisting primarily of silts and clays with some gravel layers (DWR 2004). Artificial Fill is found mostly along the bay front and wetlands areas and is derived primarily from dredging, as well as quarrying, construction, demolition debris, and municipal waste (DWR 2004).
The depth to groundwater near the Project area ranges from approximately 3.75 ft to 10.2 ft below ground surface (bgs), and shallow groundwater flow direction is typically to the northwest (SWRCB 2018). Regional groundwater flows are estimated to be west-northwest toward the San Pablo Bay located approximately 1.5 miles west of the Project area. The Radius Map Report
with GeoCheck (EDR 2019) identified no monitoring wells, federal USGS wells, public water supply wells, or state wells within 1 mile of the Project area.
It is important to note that groundwater flow direction can be influenced locally and regionally by the presence of local wetland features, surface topography, recharge and discharge areas, horizontal and vertical inconsistencies in the types and location of subsurface soils, and proximity to water pumping wells. Additionally, the depth and gradient of the Project area’s water table can change seasonally in response to variation in precipitation and recharge, and over time, in response to urban development such as stormwater controls, impervious surfaces, pumping wells, dewatering, seawater intrusion barrier projects near the coast, and other factors.
3.0 HISTORICAL LAND USE
This section provides a summary of historical land use associated with the Site. This section includes a review of historic directory listings, government agency files, as well as an EDR database report. A summary of findings for each source is presented below.
3.1 City Directory Listings
A City of Hercules address directory search was performed for the Project Site by EDR Inc.
EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5-year intervals. The search returned no records of business or other land use operations at the Site back to 1975. The results of the City directory search are provided in Appendix D.
3.2 Historic Aerial Photographs
Historical Site uses can frequently be ascertained from a review of aerial photographs. Aerial photographs of the Project area and surrounding area were provided by EDR for the years 2016, 2012, 2009, 2005, 1998, 1993, 1982, 1974, 1968, 1963, 1958, 1950, 1946, and 1939, and are summarized below in Table 1. The EDR 2019 Aerial Photo Decade Package is included in Appendix E.
Table 1 – Summary of Historic Aerial Photograph Findings Photo Year Land Use description
1939 The Site and vicinity are generally undeveloped. The Site straddles Willow Road to the south and San Pablo Avenue is in place a few hundred yards to the west. The Site is open space grassy area rolling hills with an apparent depression with areas of higher order vegetation and ponding at the northeast perimeter.
1946 No change from 1939.
1950 No change from 1939.
1958 The depressional area to the northeast is now channelized across the Site with a culvert passing below the newly construction Highway 80 to the West. Highway 4 is also constructed to the North. Small buildings appear to the East and South of the Project Site at a distance of a quarter mile. No other development is apparent.
1963 No change from 1958.
1968 Few additional buildings are scattered throughout a quarter mile radius of the site. No other land use change is apparent.
1974 No major change from 1968.
1982 A major residential and commercial development appears to the South within a quarter mile and a major commercial transportation hub appears to the east. To the north within a quarter mile, a refining operation appears.
1993 Additional major residential and commercial developments appear in every direction around the Site within a quarter mile. Industrial uses to the North have expanded greatly. 1998 No major change from 1993.
2005 Commercial and industrial uses have expended in the North and residential and commercial uses have expended in the North, South, and West.
2009 Large paved transportation use has appeared immediately to the East of the site. 2012 No major change from 2009.
2016 No change from 2009.
A review of the available historic aerial maps indicates that the Site has remained undeveloped since 1939. The Site vicinity has transformed dramatically from undeveloped minor arterial corridor, to fully developed, residential, commercial, and industrial uses along two major freeway corridors. The Site remains undeveloped with remnants of a waterway at the Northern perimeter, a tributary to Refugio Creek to the South.
3.3 Historic Topographical Maps
A historical topographic map report was prepared by EDR and included a search of a collection of public and private topographic maps. Maps dated 1902, 1914, 1916, 1947/1948, 1949/1950, 1951/1952, 1959, 1968, 1980, 2012 were provided for review by EDR and summarized below.
Table 2 summarizes the findings of the historic topo map review. The EDR 2019 Historical Topographic Map Report is included as Appendix F.
Table 2 – Summary of Historic Topographical Map Findings Photo Year Land Use description
1902 The undeveloped Site located in the middle of Refugio Valley slightly elevated on rolling hills from the valley south limit, appears to drain north to northwest and straddle an intermittent tributary of Refugio Creek to the South and lies within a depressed area at the foot of a hill to the Northeast, aligning a roadway just North of the site. RR appears along at the southern perimeter of the site.
1914 Few changes from 1902. The roadway north of the Site no longer appears and the tributary is located a few hundred feet north of the site.
1916 No change from 1914.
1947, 1948 The Site appears to drain to an independent tributary to Refugio Cree across historic San Pablo Avenue to the West.
1949,1950 Independent tributary no longer depicted within Site limits 1951,1952 No change from 1950.
1959 The tributary has been rerouted to pass through the Site through its historic intermittent path.
Highways 80 and 4 have been constructed directly to the north and west of the site. Heavy commercial/industrial development appears a mile to the north and southwest of the site. 1968 No change from 1959.
1980 Additional residential and commercial development appears to east, south north, and west of the site.
2012 Development now surrounds the Project Site in all direction up to within 1/8 mile of site.
The historic topographical maps indicate that the Project Site has been undeveloped from 1902 through 2012 as open space hillside and depressed waterway (intermittent tributary to Refugio Creek) along the norther perimeter.
3.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
Sanborn™ fire insurance maps are used to identify historic land uses that may pose a continued hazardous material risk at the Project site. These maps have been produced for most urban areas since the late 1800s as a tool to for documenting fire risk. No Sanborn maps are available for the Project Site according to the Certified Sanborn Map Report (EDR 2019) provided in Appendix G.
3.5 Government Records Search
3.5.1 File Reviews
File reviews were requested or conducted at the following government agencies to secure records not available by database or other means. File reviews were conducted at resource agencies potentially holding records of current or past land uses at facilities associated with hazardous material use or release into the environment. File reviews were conducted at the following government agencies:
City of Hercules Planning, Building & Public Works Department (Appendix H) City of Hercules Fire Department (Appendix I)
Bay Area Air Quality Control District (Appendix J)
Contra Costa County Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs (Appendix K) San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board—GeoTracker Database (Appendix L)
Record of permit applications, permits, releases, spills, accidents, fires, pollution complaints, etc. obtained from these file reviews is summarized below.
City of Hercules Planning, Building & Public Works Department A Public Records Request for Assessor Parcel Number 406 070 042 was submitted to the City of Hercules Planning, Building & Public Works Department on December 30, 2019 and was responded to on January 6, 2020 indicated no records were located for the site.
Rodeo‐Hercules Fire Protection District
A Public Records Request was submitted to Kimberly Corcoran, Administrative Services at the City of Hercules Fire Department, [email protected] on December 30, 2019 and on January 13, 2019 and was responded to on January 14, 2020 by Tammy Thomas indicating that the department has no record of any hazardous materials, spills, leaks, emergency responses, fires, or disposal of waste at this location.
Bay Area Air Quality Control District
A Public Records Request was submitted to the BAAQMD’s Public Tracker webSite https://baaqportal.publicrecordstracker.com/ on December 30, 2019 and on January 13, 2020. No response has been received yet. Another request was submitted on January 13, 2020.
Contra Costa County Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs A Public Record Request was submitted to the Contra Costa County Health Services Hazardous Materials Program. Alex McMullen, Clerical Supervisor, responded on January 2, 2020 indicating that they have no records for APN 406-070-042 back to 1986 when their records began.
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
The SFBRWQCB’s GeoTracker database is a repository of regulatory oversight files concerning undergoing investigation for pollution impacts to groundwater or threats of pollution impacts to groundwater. In addition, GeoTracker cross-tracks cleanup Site records of the DTSC.
Groundwater flow overall migrates in a westerly direction towards and into the Bay.
Thirteen current or former cleanup or permitted hazardous material sites were identified in the Geotracker map. No groundwater cleanup sites were identified within 1 mile upstream of the Project Site or within a quarter of a mile of the Site in all directions. See Figure 4 for Geotracker map.
There were also no soil cleanup sites identified within an eighth of a mile and upstream of the Project site. Two former LUST cleanup sites were identified within an eighth of a mile west (downstream) of the Project site.
The West Contra Costa Transit (T0601300532) Site located 582 feet west of the southwestern perimeter of the Project Site is a former gasoline UST cleanup Site closed on December 3, 2008.
The other LUST Site is the Caltrans Hercules Maintenance Station (T0601391848) located 554 feet to the west of the southwestern perimeter of the Project site.
The Caltrans Site was also a gasoline UST cleanup Site and has been closed since September 26, 2002. Neither Site pose a risk of hazardous materials to the Project Site due to their distance downstream both for groundwater and topographically to the Project site. Additional information for all 13 sites identified are provided in Appendix L.
GEOTRACKER DATABASE
Hercules Hotel Complex
Date:
Designed:
Draw
Checke
DWG
No Dat Revisio Approve Figure
4 Project
N
Groundwater Flow
Groundwater Flow
Project Site
Project Site
3.5.2 EDR 1‐Mile Radius Database Findings
As part of the Phase I, Ground Zone obtained environmental database records through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The EDR’s search included both federal and state resource agencies and pollution control agency records for the Site and for facilities within a one-mile radius of the Site. All but two (HIST LUST and HIST USTs) of the databases searched were “current,” i.e., had been updated within 90 days prior to the search date.
The database search included a list of sites that generated hazardous waste or have released hazardous waste at the Site or within a ⅛, ¼, ½ and 1-mile radius of the Site. The EDR report identified at least 45 hazardous waste generators within a - mile radius of the Site. Table 3 summarizes the sites listed in the EDR report that generate hazardous waste within a ¼ mile of the Site at equal or higher elevation and up-gradient with respect to prevailing groundwater flow direction; hence sites that poses a potential risk to impact the Site. Groundwater flow direction is identified by Geosolutions Inc. in 2003 (Geosolutions 2003). The Geosolutions groundwater investigation, conducted on a site within a quarter mile downstream of the Project Site, indicated that prevailing groundwater flow is westward. None of the facilities identified in Table 3 pose a proximate risk of pollution migration to the Site since none were identified for spills leaks or onSite disposal of hazardous waste. A full record of all government database listings, sources, and coverage dates within 1 mile of the Site may be found in Appendix A (EDR Radius Report).
Table 3 - Summary of Current Environmental Database Listings within ¼ Mile (at Equal or Higher Elevation) Government
Database Listing Operator Address
Distance from
Site and
Direction
Most Recent
Status Reported Waste or Pollution of Concern
Reported
Disposal
Methods
CERS HAZ WASTE,
DRYCLEANERS,
HAZNET, CERS
CREEKSIDE
CLEANERS and
HERCULES PET
CLINIC
1511 SYCAMORE
AVE
452, 0.086,
SSW
Several administrative
violations found. In
compliance as of
6/11/18
Photochemicals/photoprocessing
waste; drycleaner chemicals
Not reported but
CUPA Business Plan
required.
RCRA-SQG,
HAZNET, CERS
HOME DEPOT USA
INC H 1625
SYCAMORE AVE
1216, 0.230,
SSE
Small quantity
generator. No
violations reported.
Ignitable Waste; Corrosive Waste;
Mercury; 2,4-D (2,4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid);
Benzene; Methyl Ethyl Ketone;
Xylene, Acetone, Ethyl Acetate, Ethyl
Benzene, Ethyl Ether, Methyl
Isobutyl Ketone, N-Butyl
Alcohol, Cyclohexanone, And
Methanol; All Spent Solvent
Mixtures/Blends Containing, Before
Use, Only The Above Spent
Nonhalogenated Solvents; And All
Spent Solvent Mixtures/Blends
Containing, Before Use, One Or
More Of The Above Nonhalogenated
Solvents, And A Total Of Ten
Percent Or More (By Volume) Of
One Or More Of Those Solvents
Listed In F001, F002, F004, And
F005; And Still Bottoms From The
Recovery Of These Spent Solvents
And Spent Solvent Mixtures.
Off-Site disposal
EMI, ENF, CONTRA
COSTA CO. SITE
LIST, WDS, CIWQS
HERCULES CITY CS
111 CIVIC DRIVE 1269, 0.240, SE
Several
administrative
violations, permit
withdrawn
03/23/2018
Sanitary waste
Sanitary waste
discharge NPDES
permit 2006-0003-
DWQ
4.0 CURRENT LAND USE
This section provides a summary of the current land use at the Site based on tenant history, Site reconnaissance walks, and a review of the City of Hercules Development Services.
4.1 Site Reconnaissance
A Site reconnaissance survey was conducted on December 16, 2019. Table 4 summarizes the findings of that survey. In general, the Site is characterized by open space land use and freeway corridor, as the Site is sandwiched between Willow Avenue to the south, Interstate 80 to the West, Highway 4 to the North and Interstate 80 offramp from North to East. The Site is comprised of natural and artificial fill hills and a relatively natural drainage depression from East to West fed by a 6 foot by 4 foot concrete culvert at the eastern perimeter of the site, discharging to a 6 foot by 4 foot culvert at the northwestern perimeter of the Site which eventually discharges to Refugio Creek on the West side of Interstate 80. Evidence of fill from historic freeway construction and one concrete foundation from historic pile demolition. Also identified on Site are several drainage vents or wells recently installed apparently to help drain the site. An
apparent freshwater wetland associated with the drainage tributary dominates the northern ¼ of the Project area with woody canopy and wetland vegetation.
The photographs taken at the Site are presented in Appendix M.
Table 4 Summarizes the findings from the Site Reconnaissance Survey Table 4 - Summary of Findings from the Site Reconnaissance Survey Parameter Observation Photograph Taken
General Observations
Current Use of Property Open space, wetland Yes
Potable Water Source None Yes
Sewer Disposal Source None Yes
Storm water Sewer Drainage swale/ditch located at the northern part of Project area
Yes
Odors None Yes
Pools of Standing Liquid Wetland ponded are in norther perimeter of Project area
Yes
Electric and Hydraulic
Equipment Likely to
contain Polychlorinated
biphenyls
None
Yes
Evidence of UST None Yes
Drums and other
Hazardous Waste
Containers
None
Yes
Pits, Ponds & Lagoons Ponded wetland area at northern perimeter of Project area
Yes
Drains and sumps None Yes
Stained soil or pavement None Yes
Solid Waste Monolithic anchor or foundation at entrance to the Site near Willow Avenue.
Yes
Wastewater Discharge None Yes
Wells or Septic Systems None Yes
Topography Hills and drainage ditch depression. Hills mostly made of artificial fill.
Yes
Current land uses in Area Freeway corridor and commercial and residential development
Yes
4.2 Environmental Questionnaire
On January 14, 2020, Ground Zone with the assistance of Mr. Arvind Desai completed an environmental questionnaire to ascertain the nature of business operations and wastes generated and to assess the potential for historic or future pollution impacts to the Site (Appendix N).
According to the survey, there is no evidence of historic or current underground storage tank use on the property nor have there been any release of hazardous waste to the environment. The survey revealed no evidence of land use or business operations of any kind in over one hundred
years. The Site has not been subject to permits, citations, emergencies, dumping, waste disposal, construction, or any type of environmental hazard throughout its history.
5.0 FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Historic land use and historic operations at the Site is comprised entirely of open space and drainage swale.
No history use of hazardous waste or disposal at the Site appears in the record.
Naturally occurring asbestos may be present at the Site in artificial fill soils due to the prevalence of serpentine in the Bay Area in general.
Aerially deposited lead at hazardous levels along Interstate 80 offramp and Willow Avenue is a certain risk. Any movement and/or reuse of soil along the perimeters of the Project Site should be preceded with lead screening.
The record collected for this assessment reveals no evidence of current operations or practices which pose an imminent threat of pollution release to the Site. The record also does not reveal evidence of any history of releases of hazardous materials or hazardous waste to the Site. The record indicates that current open space land use in compliance with federal, state and local regulatory requirements.
The record also does not contain evidence of historic hazardous material impacts from contiguous properties. According to the record, properties within a quarter mile of the Site with historic hazardous material releases at equal or higher elevation to the Site are permitted hazardous waste generators with no history of releases or cleanups. Nothing in the record indicates the existence of any ongoing potential for impacts to the Site from nearby facilities.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been performed in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 and as presented in our proposal dated December 5, 2019. Any exceptions to, or deviations from, this practice are described in Section 7 of this report.
This assessment has revealed the no REC, HREC, or CREC conditions in connection with the property. Table 5 below summarizes recommended management actions based on our conclusions.
Table 5. Conclusions and Recommendations Summary
Potential Impacts Evidence of REC Found Recommended Actions Aerially Deposited Lead The Project Site is located
within 50 feet of Willow Ave.
(since prior to 1939) and
Highway 80 East to Highway
4 East offramp (since before
1958). Leaded gasoline was
used through the 1970s and
likely the shoulders of the
roadway along the northern
portion of the Project corridor
may contain aerially deposited
lead (ADL).
Conduct soil sampling for lead
within all areas planned for
excavation.
Naturally Occurring Asbestos Native soils in the San
Francisco Bay Area have the
potential to contain NOA.
Detailed geologic maps do not
indicate Franciscan Complex
rock located near the Project
Site but the Site is covered in
non-native fill and may contain
NOA.
Conduct soil sampling for NOA
within all areas planned for
excavation.
Asbestos Containing Building
Material
At the Site exists part of a
concrete anchor or foundation.
Concrete is considered suspect
asbestos containing material
by BAAQMD and NESHAP
regulations.
The object should be disposed
of intact. Or if planned for
demolition, the concrete object
should be tested for its
asbestos content.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
Information for this assessment was obtained from sources listed in the reference section of this report. This information, to the extent it was relied on to form our opinion, is assumed to be correct and complete. Ground Zone is not responsible for the quality or content of information from these sources.
Any opinions and/or recommendations presented apply to Site conditions existing at the time of performance of services. We are unable to report on, or accurately predict, generally unforeseeable events which may impact the Site following performance of services, whether occurring naturally or caused by external forces. Therefore, we cannot assume responsibility for such events or their impact. We also cannot assume responsibility for changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations.
Because this assessment was limited to regulatory file reviews, interviews and surveys, we cannot make any conclusions as to the condition of soil, groundwater, or building materials at the Site. Further investigation would be necessary to determine whether potential unreported, preregulation, or clandestine activities occurring at or near the Site have resulted in pollution impacts to soil, groundwater, or building materials at the Site.
The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by Hercules Hotel Development LLC. Ground Zone will not distribute or publish this report without consent except as required by law or court order. The information and opinions expressed in this report are given in response to a limited assignment and should be considered and implemented only in light of that assignment. The services provided by Ground Zone in completing this Project were consistent with the standard for the profession. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
Any party other than Hercules Hotel Development LLC shall not use this report without receiving prior authorization from Ground Zone. Unauthorized use of this report will relieve Ground Zone of any liability resulting from its use.
Because Hercules Hotel Development LLC is the current and historic real property owner at the Site, inquiry into the terms of and conditions of the its real property ownership or chain of title is outside the scope of this Phase I ESA investigation. Hercules Hotel Development LLC is presumed to be aware of land use conditions present in its real property title records which may evince the existence of pollution risks present at the Site.
8.0 REFERENCES
A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California - Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Compiled by Ronald K. Churchill and Robert L. Hill August 2000 ASTM International, 2013, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; ASTM E1527-13.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Request December 30, 2019).
California Geological Survey, 2000, General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos, CGS Open File Report 2000-19.
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Environmental Analysis, Stormwater Unit, Water Quality Planning Tool (http://svctenvims.dot.ca.gov/wqpt/wqpt.aspx) (Access January 9, 2020).
California Department of Water Resources, 2004, 2017, Bulletin 118, online:
www.water.ca.gov/pubs/groundwater/bulletin_118/basindescriptions/2-9.04.pdf, accessed October 5, 2018. (Updated February 27, 2004).
Contra Costa County Assessor Recorder. Assessor’s Parcel Map Book 406 Page 07 Contra Costa County, California. April 20, 2004.
Contra Costa County Community Development Department. 2003. Contra Costa County Watershed Atlas. Online: http://cocowaterweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Watershed-Atlas.pdf accessed January 6, 2020.
Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package (Inquiry 5897647.8 December 9, 2019).
Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Certified Sanborn Map Report. Inquiry 5897647.3, December 9, 2019.
Environmental Data Resources (EDR) City Directory Abstract (EDR Inc. Inquiry Number:
5897647.5 December 11, 2019)).
Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Historic Topographical Maps (Inquiry 5897647.4 December 9, 2019).
Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Radius Map Report with Geocheck. Inquiry Number:
5897647.2s December 09, 2019
Koenig, James B. Geologic Map of California. 1963.
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey. (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx). January 6, 2020.
Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District (Public Records Request December 30, 2019 and January 13, 2020).
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board—Geotracker Database (http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov). Accessed December 30, 2019.
T.W. Dibblee Jr. 2005 Geologic Map of the Richmond Quadrangle, Contra Costa & lameda Counties, California. 2005.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Amendment to Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries Under CERCLA," 40 CFR Part 312, Federal Register, Vol 78, No. 250, Dec. 30, 2013.
USGS US Topo 7.5-minute map for Mare Island, CA 2018 Published Date: 2018-09- 05Metadata Updated: 2019-07-26 Format: Geospatial PDF (35.33 MB), Extent: 7.5 x 7.5 minute.
Appendix A – EDR Radius Report with Geocheck
FORM-LBC-LMI
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Hercules Hotel Complex
Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez
Hercules, CA 94547
Inquiry Number: 5897647.2s
December 09, 2019
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 9
Orphan Summary 208
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-11
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC5897647.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
HYW 80 EAST AND HYW 4 TO MARTINEZ
HERCULES, CA 94547
COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 38.0131740 - 38˚ 0’ 47.42’’
Longitude (West): 122.2691080 - 122˚ 16’ 8.78’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10
UTM X (Meters): 564160.9
UTM Y (Meters): 4207323.0
Elevation: 65 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5602140 MARE ISLAND, CA
Version Date: 2012
Northeast Map: 5602094 BENICIA, CA
Version Date: 2012
Southeast Map: 5640608 BRIONES VALLEY, CA
Version Date: 2012
Southwest Map: 5640624 RICHMOND, CA
Version Date: 2012
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140608
Source: USDA
5897647.2s Page 2
39 BIO-RAD LABORATORIES HERCULES INDUSTRIAL HIST Cal-Sites Higher 3165, 0.599, NW 38 MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE ALFRED NOBEL DRIVE/L ENVIROSTOR, SCH, CERS Lower 3017, 0.571, NW 37 HERCULES INC CORNER OF SAN PABLO RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, HIST Cal-Sites, DEED,... Lower 2747, 0.520, West 36 CENTEX HOMES OF CALI BETWEEN I-80 AND SAN RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR Higher 2533, 0.480, WSW 35 GELSAR SAN PABLO AVENUE/SYC ENVIROSTOR, VCP, LIENS Lower 2226, 0.422, West 34 BUILDING ASSOCIATES 100 JASPER CT LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST CORTESE, CONTRA COSTA CO....Higher 2155, 0.408, SW H33 CARONE BROS INC 1350 BAYBERRY LUST, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 1779, 0.337, ESE 32 FORMER PG&E HERCULES 4200 SAN PABLO AVENU CPS-SLIC, BROWNFIELDS, CERS Lower 1765, 0.334, NNW H31 CALTRANS DISTRICT 4 1369 BAYBERRY AVE RCRA-SQG, LUST, SWEEPS UST, FINDS, ECHO, ENF, CERS Lower 1718, 0.325, ESE 30 HERCULES CITY CS 111 CIVIC DRIVE EMI, ENF, CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST, WDS, CIWQS,... Higher 1269, 0.240, SE G29 RITE AID #5923 1560 SYCAMORE AVE RCRA-SQG Lower 1243, 0.235, SSW G28 RITE AID #5923 1560 SYCAMORE AVE CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST Lower 1243, 0.235, SSW G27 RITE AID #5923 1560 SYCAMORE AVE CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET Lower 1243, 0.235, SSW F26 THE HOME DEPOT STORE 1625 SYCAMORE AVE CERS HAZ WASTE, CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST, CERS Higher 1216, 0.230, SSE F25 HOME DEPOT USA INC H 1625 SYCAMORE AVE RCRA-SQG, HAZNET, CERS Higher 1216, 0.230, SSE 24 RALEYS 352 1592 SYCAMORE AVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 1197, 0.227, SSW 23 SAFEWAY STORE NO 287 4000 SAN PABLO AVENU NPDES, CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST, CIWQS Lower 1159, 0.220, NW 22 PG&E FRANKLIN SUBSTA 1332 WILLOW AVE CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST, CERS Lower 1106, 0.209, ESE D21 PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE RCRA-SQG, LUST, CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST, HIST...Lower 1014, 0.192, SW D20 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 1540 SYCAMORE AVE HIST UST, HAZNET Lower 1014, 0.192, SW D19 AT&T CALIFORNIA - WB 1540 SYCAMORE AVE UST Lower 1014, 0.192, SW C18 HERCULES CLEANERS 1581 SYCAMORE AVE, # DRYCLEANERS, EMI, CERS Lower 1004, 0.190, SSW C17 HERCULES CLEANERS 1581 SYCAMORE AVE 7 CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST Lower 1004, 0.190, SSW E16 HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS, HAZNET, CERS Lower 894, 0.169, WNW E15 HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE UST Lower 894, 0.169, WNW E14 HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST Lower 894, 0.169, WNW E13 HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 894, 0.169, WNW 12 CENTEX HOMES OF CALI I-80 AND SYCAMORE HIST Cal-Sites Lower 882, 0.167, WSW D11 TACO BELL 16146 1541 SYCAMORE AVE CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST, CERS Lower 862, 0.163, SSW 10 JACK IN THE BOX 3800 SAN PABLO AVE CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST Lower 831, 0.157, West D9 PARK LAKE CLEANERS 1572 C SYCAMORE AVE DRYCLEANERS Lower 772, 0.146, SW C8 BIG LOTS #1957 1551 SYCAMORE AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 765, 0.145, SSW C7 BIG LOTS HERCULES 19 1551 SYCAMORE AVE CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET, CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LISTLower 765, 0.145, SSW 6 WEST CONTRA COSTA TR 100 SYCAMORE AVE LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST CORTESE, CONTRA COSTA CO....Lower 571, 0.108, West B5 CENTEX PROPERTIES HE SAN PABLO AVE/I-80 A SEMS-ARCHIVE Lower 513, 0.097, WNW B4 HERCULES, INC. CORNER OF SAN PABLO CA BOND EXP. PLAN Lower 513, 0.097, WNW A3 CREEKSIDE CLEANERS 1511 SYCAMORE AVE UN RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, DRYCLEANERS, EMI, HAZNET,... Higher 452, 0.086, SSW A2 CREEKSIDE DRY CLEANE 1511 SYCAMORE AVE EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 452, 0.086, SSW A1 HERCULES PET CLINIC 1511 B SYCAMORE AVE CERS HAZ WASTE, DRYCLEANERS, HAZNET, CERS Higher 452, 0.086, SSW
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
HYW 80 EAST AND HYW 4 TO MARTINEZ
HERCULES, CA 94547
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS 5897647.2s Page 3
J45 RODEO MUFFLER 650 PARKER AVE ENVIROSTOR, LUST, CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET, HIST... Lower 5267, 0.998, North J44 CLASSIC CLEANERS 679 PARKER AVENUE ENVIROSTOR, VCP, CERS Lower 5247, 0.994, North 43 BIO RAD LABORATORIES 2000 ALFRED NOBEL DR RCRA-SQG, RESPONSE, ENVIROSTOR, CERS HAZ WASTE,...Lower 5130, 0.972, NNW I42 SAN PABLO AVENUE/HER SAN PABLO AVENUE/LIN ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 4152, 0.786, North I41 HERCULES LLC 4901 SAN PABLO AVENU HWP, CERS Higher 4110, 0.778, North 40 HERCULES MIDDLE SCHO SYCAMORE AVENUE/WILL ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 3467, 0.657, WNW
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
HYW 80 EAST AND HYW 4 TO MARTINEZ
HERCULES, CA 94547
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database
SWRCY Recycler Database
HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register SCH School Property Evaluation Program
CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database
Local Land Records
LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
DEED Deed Restriction Listing
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List
EMI Emissions Inventory Data
ENF Enforcement Action Listing
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data
ICE ICE
HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
MINES Mines Site Location Listing
MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing
NPDES NPDES Permits Listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
PROC Certified Processors Database
Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records
UIC UIC Listing
UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER)
WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
WDS Waste Discharge System
WIP Well Investigation Program Case List
MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER)
PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER)
WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System
CERS CERS
NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER)
OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER)
PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER)
SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER)
WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2019 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CENTEX PROPERTIES HE SAN PABLO AVE/I-80 A WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.097 mi.) B5 30 Site ID: 0902079
EPA Id: CAD980817456
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/24/2019 has revealed that there are 5 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CREEKSIDE CLEANERS 1511 SYCAMORE AVE UN SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.086 mi.) A3 19 EPA ID:: CAD983661273
HOME DEPOT USA INC H 1625 SYCAMORE AVE SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) F25 89 EPA ID:: CAR000169243
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 EPA ID:: CAT080020209
RALEYS 352 1592 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) 24 88 EPA ID:: CA0000927509
RITE AID #5923 1560 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) G29 104 EPA ID:: CAR000211730
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE: Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk.
A review of the RESPONSE list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 RESPONSE sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CENTEX HOMES OF CALI BETWEEN I-80 AND SAN WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.480 mi.) 36 145 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 07/29/2019 Status: Certified
Facility Id: 7650001
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERCULES INC CORNER OF SAN PABLO W 1/2 - 1 (0.520 mi.) 37 147 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 07/29/2019 Status: Certified / Operation & Maintenance
Facility Id: 7280156
BIO RAD LABORATORIES 2000 ALFRED NOBEL DR NNW 1/2 - 1 (0.972 mi.) 43 170 Database: RESPONSE, Date of Government Version: 07/29/2019 Status: Certified
Facility Id: 7280160
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.
A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2019 has revealed that there are 9 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CENTEX HOMES OF CALI BETWEEN I-80 AND SAN WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.480 mi.) 36 145 Status: Certified
Facility Id: 7650001
SAN PABLO AVENUE/HER SAN PABLO AVENUE/LIN N 1/2 - 1 (0.786 mi.) I42 168 Status: No Action Required
Facility Id: 7010007
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GELSAR SAN PABLO AVENUE/SYC W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.422 mi.) 35 143
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10
Status: Certified
Facility Id: 7280162
HERCULES INC CORNER OF SAN PABLO W 1/2 - 1 (0.520 mi.) 37 147 Status: Certified / Operation & Maintenance
Facility Id: 7280156
MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE ALFRED NOBEL DRIVE/L NW 1/2 - 1 (0.571 mi.) 38 160 Status: No Action Required
Facility Id: 7280166
HERCULES MIDDLE SCHO SYCAMORE AVENUE/WILL WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.657 mi.) 40 164 Status: No Further Action
Facility Id: 7000005
BIO RAD LABORATORIES 2000 ALFRED NOBEL DR NNW 1/2 - 1 (0.972 mi.) 43 170 Status: Certified
Facility Id: 7280160
CLASSIC CLEANERS 679 PARKER AVENUE N 1/2 - 1 (0.994 mi.) J44 193 Status: Active
Facility Id: 60002384
RODEO MUFFLER 650 PARKER AVE N 1/2 - 1 (0.998 mi.) J45 198 Status: Refer: Other Agency
Facility Id: 7550003
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 5 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BUILDING ASSOCIATES 100 JASPER CT SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.408 mi.) 34 140 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: 07-0578
Facility Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0601300533
date9: 10/6/1998
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WEST CONTRA COSTA TR 100 SYCAMORE AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.108 mi.) 6 31 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: 07-0576
Facility Status: Leak being confirmed
Global Id: T0601300532
PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: 07-0694
Facility Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0601300642
date9: 3/21/1997
CALTRANS DISTRICT 4 1369 BAYBERRY AVE ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.) H31 124 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Facility Id: 07-0817
Facility Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0601391848
date9: 9/26/2002
CARONE BROS INC 1350 BAYBERRY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.337 mi.) H33 139 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: T0601300610
CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CPS-SLIC site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FORMER PG&E HERCULES 4200 SAN PABLO AVENU NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.334 mi.) 32 137 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: T10000006209
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) E15 50 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019
Facility Id: 07-000-772052
AT&T CALIFORNIA - WB 1540 SYCAMORE AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D19 63 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/09/2019
Facility Id: 07-000-716428
Facility Id: 716428
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs.
A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2019 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GELSAR SAN PABLO AVENUE/SYC W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.422 mi.) 35 143 Status: Certified
Facility Id: 7280162
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process.
A review of the BROWNFIELDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/23/2019 has revealed that there is 1 BROWNFIELDS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FORMER PG&E HERCULES 4200 SAN PABLO AVENU NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.334 mi.) 32 137
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
HIST Cal-Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR.
A review of the HIST Cal-Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there are 3 HIST Cal-Sites sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BIO-RAD LABORATORIES HERCULES INDUSTRIAL NW 1/2 - 1 (0.599 mi.) 39 162 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CENTEX HOMES OF CALI I-80 AND SYCAMORE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) 12 45 HERCULES INC CORNER OF SAN PABLO W 1/2 - 1 (0.520 mi.) 37 147
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13
CERS HAZ WASTE: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs.
A review of the CERS HAZ WASTE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/14/2019 has revealed that there are 6 CERS HAZ WASTE sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERCULES PET CLINIC 1511 B SYCAMORE AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.086 mi.) A1 9 THE HOME DEPOT STORE 1625 SYCAMORE AVE SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) F26 94 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BIG LOTS HERCULES 19 1551 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.145 mi.) C7 34 HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) E16 50 PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 RITE AID #5923 1560 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) G27 99 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list.
A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WEST CONTRA COSTA TR 100 SYCAMORE AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.108 mi.) 6 31 Status: A
Tank Status: A
Comp Number: 57912
PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 Status: A
Tank Status: A
Comp Number: 16428
HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database.
A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 2 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHO 1540 SYCAMORE AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D20 64 PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 Facility Id: 00000016428
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14
CERS TANKS: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs.
A review of the CERS TANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/14/2019 has revealed that there are 2 CERS TANKS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) E16 50 PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.
A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/24/2019 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BIG LOTS #1957 1551 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.145 mi.) C8 39 EPA ID:: CAL000391104
HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) E13 48 EPA ID:: CAL000345310
CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated.
A review of the CA BOND EXP. PLAN list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/01/1989 has revealed that there is 1 CA BOND EXP. PLAN site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERCULES, INC. CORNER OF SAN PABLO WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.097 mi.) B4 30 DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners’ agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services.
A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 DRYCLEANERS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERCULES PET CLINIC 1511 B SYCAMORE AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.086 mi.) A1 9 Database: DRYCLEANERS, Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 EPA Id: CAL000414957
CREEKSIDE CLEANERS 1511 SYCAMORE AVE UN SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.086 mi.) A3 19 Database: DRYCLEANERS, Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15
EPA Id: CAD983661273
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PARK LAKE CLEANERS 1572 C SYCAMORE AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.146 mi.) D9 40 Database: DRYCLEANERS, Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 EPA Id: CAL000084203
EPA Id: CAL000286739
HERCULES CLEANERS 1581 SYCAMORE AVE, # SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.190 mi.) C18 60 Database: DRYCLEANERS, Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 EPA Id: CAL000121936
HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency.
A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 4 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BUILDING ASSOCIATES 100 JASPER CT SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.408 mi.) 34 140 Reg Id: 07-0578
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WEST CONTRA COSTA TR 100 SYCAMORE AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.108 mi.) 6 31 Reg Id: 07-0576
PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 Reg Id: 07-0694
CARONE BROS INC 1350 BAYBERRY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.337 mi.) H33 139 Reg Id: 07-0661
HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor.
A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/19/2019 has revealed that there is 1 HWP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERCULES LLC 4901 SAN PABLO AVENU N 1/2 - 1 (0.778 mi.) I41 166 EPA Id: CAT000617407
Cleanup Status: PROTECTIVE FILER
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16
CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST: Lists includes sites from the Underground Tank Program, Hazardous Waste Generator Program & Business Plan 12185 Program
A review of the CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/20/2019 has revealed that there are 13 CONTRA COSTA CO. SITE LIST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CREEKSIDE CLEANERS 1511 SYCAMORE AVE UN SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.086 mi.) A3 19 Facility Id: FA0041731
Facility Id: FA0028445
THE HOME DEPOT STORE 1625 SYCAMORE AVE SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) F26 94 Facility Id: FA0030607
Facility Id: FA0029983
HERCULES CITY CS 111 CIVIC DRIVE SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) 30 107 Facility Id: FA0030529
Facility Id: FA0030666
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WEST CONTRA COSTA TR 100 SYCAMORE AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.108 mi.) 6 31 Facility Id: FA0032440
BIG LOTS HERCULES 19 1551 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.145 mi.) C7 34 Facility Id: FA0034949
JACK IN THE BOX 3800 SAN PABLO AVE W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) 10 41 Facility Id: FA0037818
TACO BELL 16146 1541 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.163 mi.) D11 41 Facility Id: FA0040696
HERCULES SHELL 3900 SAN PABLO AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.) E14 49 Facility Id: FA0030792
Facility Id: FA0028770
HERCULES CLEANERS 1581 SYCAMORE AVE 7 SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.190 mi.) C17 59 Facility Id: FA0028449
PACIFIC BELL 1540 SYCAMORE AVENUE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) D21 66 Facility Id: FA0031835
PG&E FRANKLIN SUBSTA 1332 WILLOW AVE ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) 22 83 Facility Id: FA0029117
SAFEWAY STORE NO 287 4000 SAN PABLO AVENU NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.) 23 86 Facility Id: FA0042474
RITE AID #5923 1560 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.) G28 103 Facility Id: FA0030118
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17
listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CREEKSIDE DRY CLEANE 1511 SYCAMORE AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.086 mi.) A2 18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5897647.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records.
Site Name Database(s)
____________ ____________
HERCULES HOTEL CIWQS
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 kV
80 3 2 0
2 8 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
2 4 0
2 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
1 6 0
120
1 2 0
1 2 0
160
1 6 0 1 6 0
2 0 0
2 8
80 0
2 4 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
8 0
2 0 0
8 0
160
1 6 0
40 4 0
4 0
8 0
1 2 0 120
1 2 0
4 0
1 2 0
8 0
4 0
80 8 0
2 8 0
2 4 0
2 0 0 2 0 0
2 0 0
1 6 0
160
2 0 0
8 0
2 0 0
23 2
0 80
160
1 6 0
2 40
2 0 0
2 00
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 4 0
240
2 4 0
8 0 4 0
40 4 0
4 0
40 4 0
40 4 0
4 0
4 0
40 80
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
80 8 0
80 8 0
1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
120
1 2 0
1 2 0 1 2 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
1 6 0
160
2 0 0 1 6 0
200
2 8 0
3 2 0
2 8 0 2 8 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 0 0
2 4 0
2 0 0 1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
160
1 6 0 2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
320
2 1 6 0
2 0 0
2 8 0
2 0 0
3 2 0
1 2 0
2 4 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
2 0 0 2 0 0
3 2 0
2 8 0
3 2
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 4 0
3 2 02 0 0
2 0 0
3 2 0
3 6 0
1 6 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
3 6 0
2 80
2 0 0
2 0
2 0
0 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
5 20
2 0 0
8 0
2 8 0
4 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
0 4 0
4 4
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
80 8 0
2 8 0
8 0
1 2
1 6 0
2 4 0
4 0
1 6 0
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 kV
240
200
200
200
120
200 280
240
160
40 40
40 80
40 80
40 40
40 80
80 120
TC5897647.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in Version Date: 2012
Southwest Map: 5640624 RICHMOND, CA
Version Date: 2012
Southeast Map: 5640608 BRIONES VALLEY, CA
Version Date: 2012
Northeast Map: 5602094 BENICIA, CA
Version Date: 2012
Target Property Map: 5602140 MARE ISLAND, CA
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Elevation: 65 ft. above sea level
UTM Y (Meters): 4207323.0
UTM X (Meters): 564160.9
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10
Longitude (West): 122.269108 - 122˚ 16’ 8.79’’
Latitude (North): 38.013174 - 38˚ 0’ 47.43’’
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
HERCULES, CA 94547
HYW 80 EAST AND HYW 4 TO MARTINEZ
HERCULES HOTEL COMPLEX
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft) TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles ✩Target Property Elevation: 65 ft.
North South
West East 301238 249221191 6241 89 10053 6265 160 18814310498 10079 85918043 6239 5037 87654144 63 91 124948181 148 General Topographic Gradient: General NNW
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-3
Not Reported
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
Status: Not found
Search Radius: 1.25 miles
Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*:
* ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
MARE ISLAND YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
06013C0232F FEMA FIRM Flood data
06013C0043G FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
06013C0044G FEMA FIRM Flood data
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Tertiary
Series: Miocene
Code: Tm (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 5 3
2 1
3 4
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
TC5897647.2s Page A-6
Min:
Max: 7.3
Min: 0
Not reported Max: 1.4
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
bedrock
3 35 inches 38 inches unweathered
Min:
Max: 7.3
Min: 0
Not reported Max: 1.4
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
2 25 inches 35 inches silty clay Silt-Clay
Min:
Max: 7.3
Min: 0
Not reported Max: 1.4
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
1 0 inches 25 inches clay Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: clay
Soil Component Name: SEHORN
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-7
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: loam
Soil Component Name: TIERRA
Soil Map ID: 3
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
2 29 inches 59 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
1 0 inches 29 inches clay Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: clay
Soil Component Name: CLEAR LAKE
Soil Map ID: 2
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-8
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high Soil Surface Texture: clay
Soil Component Name: CROPLEY
Soil Map ID: 4
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
3 59 inches 70 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
2 25 inches 59 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 7.9
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.4
Max: 4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
1 0 inches 25 inches loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-9
Max: Min:
Min: 0
Not reported Max: 1.4
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
1 0 inches 9 inches clay loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward Soil Surface Texture: clay loam
Soil Component Name: LOS OSOS
Soil Map ID: 5
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
2 24 inches 59 inches clay Silt-Clay
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.4
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
1 0 inches 24 inches clay Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-10
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
No PWS System Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
State Database 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
Federal USGS 1.000
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
Max: Min:
Min: 0
Not reported Max: 1.4
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
bedrock
3 31 inches 35 inches weathered
Max: Min:
Min: 0
Not reported Max: 1.4
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
2 9 inches 31 inches clay Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH)
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
TC5897647.2s Page A-11
No Wells Found
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 6 0
80 3 2 0
2 8
2 0
0 0
2 0 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
2 0 0 2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
1 6 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
160
160
1 6 0 1 6 0
2 80 8 0
2 4 0
120
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
8 0
2 0 0
8 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
40 4 0 4 0
80 1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
4 0
1 20
8 0
4 0
80 8 0
2 8
2 0
4 0
2 0 0 2 0 0
1 20
2 00
1 6 0
1 6 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
2 3
0 2 8
1 0
6 0
1 6 0
2 40
2 0 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 4 0
240
2 4 0
1 2 0
120
8 0
8 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
40 4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
8 8 0
80 8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
80 8 0
8 0
8 0
1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0
1 2 0 1 20
2 0 0
2 0 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
2 0 0 1 6 0
2 00
2 8 0
3 2 0 2 8 0 2 80
2 4 0
2 40
2 0 0
2 4 0
2 0 0 1 6 0 1 6 0
1 6 0
1 6 0
160
1 6 0 2 0 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
1 2 0 0
3 2 0
3 6 0
3 60
320
2 0 0
1 20
2 0 0
2 0 0 1 6 0
2 0 0
8 0
8 0
2 00 2 0 0
2 0 0
2 80
2 0 0
4 0 0
3 20
1 2 0
1 2 0
2 4 0
1 6 0
1 60
1 6 0
4 4 0
2 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 3 2 0 2 8 0
2 8 0
320
2 40
2 8 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
2 8 0 2 40
2 4 0
2 8 0
3 2 0
2 8 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
3 2 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
3 2
1 0
6 0
3 60
1 6 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
2 00
3 60
2 80
2 0 0
2 00
2 4 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 40
2 0 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
4 0
4 0
4 0 0
4 00
3 2 0
3 2 0
4 80
5 2 0
2 0 0
2 0 0
00 5 6 0
5 2 0
4 8 0 5 20
2 0 0
5 2 0
5 6 0
5 2 0
5 2 0
4 8 0
4 8 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 4 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 6 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
8 0
8 0
8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
2 8 0
1 2 0
120
1 6 0
0 1 6 0
2 4 0
2 4 0
3 2 0
1 6 0
2 0 0
2 4 0 2 8 0
2 8 0
3 2 0
5 6 0
8 0 0 4 4 0
CA
TC5897647.2s Page A-13
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 2nd Floor 0.300 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 1st Floor 1.000 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Number of sites tested: 1
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 94547
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for CONTRA COSTA County: 2
94547 7 0
______ ________ ________
Zipcode Num Tests > 4 pCi/L
Radon Test Results
State Database: CA Radon
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information System R
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management.
TC5897647.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
Water Well Database
Source: Department of Water Resources
Telephone: 916-651-9648
California Drinking Water Quality Database
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-324-2319
The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information.
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
California Oil and Gas Well Locations
Source: Department of Conservation
Telephone: 916-323-1779
Oil and Gas well locations in the state.
California Earthquake Fault Lines
Source: California Division of Mines and Geology
The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.
RADON
State Database: CA Radon
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-210-8558
Radon Database for California
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-356-4020
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC5897647.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-356-4020
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC5897647.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
Appendix B – Geology Maps
THE RESOURCES AGENCY
MARY D. NICHOLS
SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES
OPEN-FILE REPORT 2000-19
A GENERAL LOCATION GUIDE FOR ULTRAMAFIC
ROCKS IN CALIFORNIA - AREAS MORE LIKELY TO
CONTAIN NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS
August, 2000
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
Division of Mines and Geology
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
GRAY DAVIS
GOVERNOR
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
DARRYL YOUNG
DIRECTOR
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, P.O. Box 2980, Sacramento, California 95812-2980, (916) 445-5716, Web Site: http://www.consrv.ca.gov/
O C E A N
Copyright © 2000 by the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent of the Division of Mines and Geology.
The California Department of Conservation makes no warranties as to the suitability of this product for any particular purpose.
P A C I F I C
A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks
in California - Areas More Likely to Contain
Naturally Occurring Asbestos
Compiled By
Ronald K. Churchill and Robert L. Hill
August 2000
be present. Small amounts of chrysotile asbestos are common in serpentinite because chrysotile is one of the serpentine group minerals. Tremolite-actinolite asbestos (amphibole asbestos) may also occur with serpentinite, but such occurrences are less common than chrysotile asbestos.
This map should not be used to determine whether bedrock or soil on a particular parcel of land in or adjacent to areas identified as ultramafic rocks contains asbestos.
A site-specific investigation would be required to make such a determination.
Consequently, such occurrences are not shown on this map.
The small scale of this map (1:1,000,000) precludes showing detailed boundaries of ultramafic rock units and small occurrences of ultramafic rocks. It should be used only as a general guide to the presence of ultramafic rocks that may contain asbestos.
This map is derived from the Geologic Map of California (1:750,000 scale - one inch equals about 12 miles), Jennings (1977). No ultramafic rocks are shown in Solano and Madera counties on this map. However, ultramafic rocks are shown as present in these counties on available more detailed maps at scales of 1:250,000 (one inch equals about 4 miles) and larger. In addition to association with ultramafic rock and serpentinite, asbestos minerals are also known to occur in association with some faults This rock type has a greasy or waxy appearance and may be dark to light green, brown, yellow or white. In addition to serpentine minerals, small amounts of other minerals such as magnetite, chromite, talc, brucite, and tremolite-actinolite may Serpentinite -- Serpentinite is a rock consisting almost entirely of one or more serpentine minerals. Serpentinite is not identified as a separate rock unit on this map but is likely to be found within areas of ultramafic rock shown on the map. in particular geologic settings, certain non-ultramafic related metamorphic rock types, and magnesium-rich carbonate rocks such as dolomite. These asbestos occurrences are much less common and their locations less well known than for ultramafic rocks.
Asbestos -- Asbestos is the generic term for the naturally occurring fibrous (asbestiform) varieties of six silicate minerals. These minerals are: chrysotile, tremolite (when fibrous), actinolite (when fibrous), crocidolite (fibrous riebeckite), usually do not occur as fibrous crystals and are not asbestos minerals. Although the term serpentine is commonly used to refer to the rock serpentinite, it is actually the name of the group of minerals that makes up the rock serpentinite. amphibole mineral group. Asbestos also refers to an industrial product obtained by mining and processing deposits of the asbestiform minerals listed above. serpentinite in small veins, where the fibers are oriented perpendicular to the vein walls (cross-fiber veins) or parallel to the vein walls (slip-fiber veins).
Chrysotile fibers are one type of asbestos. The other serpentine minerals anthophyllite (when fibrous), and amosite (fibrous cummingonite-grunerite).
Chrysotile is the most common asbestos mineral in California and belongs to the serpentine mineral group. The remaining asbestos minerals belong to the Serpentine --The serpentine group minerals are hydrous magnesium silicate minerals, of which lizardite, antigorite and chrysotile are the most common.
Chrysotile forms crystals that are naturally fibrous. These fibers occur in
MAP USAGE AND LIMITATIONS
Definitions
Note--occurrences of non-ultramafic rock types, such as gabbro or diabase, may be included within some of the ultramafic rock areas shown on this map. Asbestos is much less likely to be associated with these non-ultramafic rock types.
This map may be viewed on the California Department of Conservation website at http://www.consrv.ca.gov, which includes links to other sites with asbestos information.
The ultramafic rock areas shown on this map are adapted from Jennings, C.W., 1977, Geologic Map of California, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map No. 2, scale 1:750,000.
partially to completely altered to serpentinite, a type of metamorphic rock. Sometimes the metamorphic conditions are right for the formation of chrysotile asbestos or tremoliteactinolite asbestos in bodies of ultramafic rock or along their boundaries. minerals olivine, augite, hypersthene, or less commonly hornblende. Ultramafic rocks form in high temperature environments well below the surface of the earth. By the time they are exposed at the surface by uplift and erosion, ultramafic rocks may be Ultramafic rocks are dunite, peridotite, pyroxenite, and less common in California, hornblendite (IUGS classification of ultramafic rocks, in Philpotts, 1990*). These igneous rocks contain 90 percent or more of the dark colored iron-magnesium-silicate *Philpotts, A.R., 1990, Principles of igneous and metamorphic petrology, Figure 6-3, IUGS (International Union of Geological Sciences) classification of ultramafic rocks:
Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, page 96.
be an issue. In these areas, consideration of the implications of the presence or absence of asbestos through examination of more detailed maps and site-specific investigations could be warranted as part of public or private decision making.
This map shows the areas more likely to contain natural occurrences of asbestos in California. Its purpose is to inform government agencies, private industry and the public of the areas in the State where natural occurrences of asbestos may
MAP PURPOSE
Natural occurrences of asbestos are more likely to be encountered in, and immediately adjacent to, areas of ultramafic rocks. The general location of these rocks is noted on this map. While geologic conditions are more likely for asbestos formation in or near these areas, its presence is not certain. The only way to establish the presence or absence of asbestos at a specific location is through a detailed site examination by a qualified geologist.
EXPLANATION OF ULTRAMAFIC ROCK UNIT
INFORMATION SOURCES
238°
2 36°2
114°
2 2
2 240°
118°
120°
242°
120°
120°
234°
2 2
2 2
122°
36°
2 o
34 122 o
2 2
42°
124°
40°
124°
2 2
2 124°
38°
95 95
10 8
15 40
15 15
215
15 5
6 395
405
58 5
14 80
50 395
101
5 99
580
101
97 101
5 395
5 99
80 101
95 95
10 8
15 40
15 15
215
15 5
6 395
405
5 58
14 80
50 395
101
5 99
395
97 580
101
80 99
5 101
101
5 80
SCALE 1:1,100,000
Kilometers
80 40
40 Miles
0 20
0 20
Inyo
Mariposa
Mono
Madera
Fresno
El Dorado
Amador
Placer
Calaveras
Tuolumne
Stanislaus
Sacramento
San Joaquin
Merced
San Mateo
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
San Benito
Monterey
Trinity
Sonoma
Marin
Napa
San Francisco
Yolo
Colusa Sutter
Butte
Yuba
Lake
Solano
Contra Costa
Mendocino
Alameda
Nevada
Glenn
Tehama
Shasta
Siskiyou
Lassen
San Bernardino
Sierra
Plumas
San Luis Obispo
Los Angeles
Santa Barbara
Kings
Kern
Orange
Imperial
San Diego
Riverside
Modoc
Del Norte
Alpine
Humboldt
Tulare
Ventura
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - GRAY DAVIS, GOVERNOR
THE RESOURCES AGENCY - MARY NICHOLS, SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION - DARRYL YOUNG, DIRECTOR
A GENERAL LOCATION GUIDE FOR ULTRAMAFIC ROCKS IN CALIFORNIA -
AREAS MORE LIKELY TO CONTAIN NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS
DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
JAMES F. DAVIS, STATE GEOLOGIST
Layout and digitizing by Kim Larose, L.G. Youngs and Joy Arthur
DISCLAIMER
The State of California and the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology make no representations or warranties as to the actual presence or absence of natural asbestos at specific sites within or near the ultramafic rock areas shown on this map. Further, the State and the Department make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of the data shown on the map. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or any third party on account of or arising from the use of this map.
Acknowledgement: Dr. R.G. Coleman, Professor Emeritus,
Stanford University reviewed a draft version of this map.
Dr. Coleman's suggestions and comments
are greatly appreciated.
Massive serpentinite, partially to completely serpentinized peridotite (ultramafic rock), with a brown to reddish brown weathered surface due to oxidation of iron.
Sheared serpentinite showing its characteristic variegated green color and greasy luster.
Highly sheared and somewhat weathered light green to white serpentinite.
Cross-fiber chrysotile (asbestos) vein, 3/4 inch wide, in serpentinite.
UKIAH
1960
SANTA ROSA
1963
SAN FRANCISCO
1990
SANTA CRUZ
1959
CHICO
1992
SAN JOSE
1966
SACRAMENTO
1981
WESTWOOD
(SUSANVILLE)
1960
SAN LUIS OBISPO
1959
SANTA MARIA
195919591959 19591959 1959
ALTURAS
1958
WEED
1987
REDDING
1962
INDEX TO GEOLOGIC ATLAS SERIES
AND REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP SERIES MAPS
LONG BEACH
1962
WALKER LAKE
1963
MARIPOSA
1967
LOS ANGELES
1969
BAKERSFIELD
1965
FRESNO
1966
Counties in solid green contain ultramafic rock areas shown on the adjacent map.
These areas are shown in more detail on the Division of Mines and Geology 1:250,000 scale Geologic Atlas and Regional Geologic Map Series maps. Madera and Solano small occurrence is present in Kern County.
SAN DIEGO
1962
SANTA ANA
1966
SAN
BERNARDINO
1969
TRONA
1963
DEATH VALLEY
1977
counties, in diagonal pattern, have ultramafic rock areas shown on the Geologic Atlas and Regional Geologic Map Series maps that are too small to show on the adjacent map.
Los Angeles County has small utramafic rock occurrences on Catalina Island and a
SALTON SEA
1967
EL CENTRO
1962
KINGMAN
1961
NEEDLES
1964
OPEN-FILE REPORT 2000-19
UKIAH
1960
SANTA ROSA
1963
SAN FRANCISCO
1990
SANTA CRUZ
1959
CHICO
1992
SAN JOSE
1966
SACRAMENTO
1981
WESTWOOD
(SUSANVILLE)
1960
SAN LUIS OBISPO
1959
SANTA MARIA
195919591959 19591959 1959
ALTURAS
1958
WEED
1987
REDDING
1962
INDEX TO GEOLOGIC ATLAS SERIES
AND REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP SERIES MAPS
LONG BEACH
1962
WALKER LAKE
1963
MARIPOSA
1967
LOS ANGELES
1969
BAKERSFIELD
1965
FRESNO
1966
Counties in solid green contain ultramafic rock areas shown on the adjacent map.
These areas are shown in more detail on the Division of Mines and Geology 1:250,000 scale Geologic Atlas and Regional Geologic Map Series maps. Madera and Solano small occurrence is present in Kern County.
SAN DIEGO
1962
SANTA ANA
1966
SAN
BERNARDINO
1969
TRONA
1963
DEATH VALLEY
1977
counties, in diagonal pattern, have ultramafic rock areas shown on the Geologic Atlas and Regional Geologic Map Series maps that are too small to show on the adjacent map.
Los Angeles County has small utramafic rock occurrences on Catalina Island and a
SALTON SEA
1967
EL CENTRO
1962
KINGMAN
1961
NEEDLES
1964
EXPLANATION TEXT FOR MAP
A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos
MAP PURPOSE
This map shows the areas more likely to contain natural occurrences of asbestos in California. Its purpose is to inform government agencies, private industry and the public of the areas in the State where natural occurrences of asbestos may be an issue. In these areas, consideration of the implications of the presence or absence of asbestos through examination of more detailed maps and sitespecific investigations could be warranted as part of public or private decision making. Natural occurrences of asbestos are more likely to be encountered in, and immediately adjacent to, areas of ultramafic rocks. The general location of these rocks is noted on this map. While geologic conditions are more likely for asbestos formation in or near these areas, its presence is not certain. The only way to establish the presence or absence of asbestos at a specific location is through a detailed site examination by a qualified geologist.
EXPLANATION OF ULTRAMAFIC ROCK UNIT
Ultramafic rocks are dunite, peridotite, pyroxenite, and less common in California, hornblendite (IUGS classification of ultramafic rocks, in Philpotts, 1990*). These igneous rocks contain 90 percent or more of the dark colored iron-magnesiumsilicate minerals olivine, augite, hypersthene, or less commonly hornblende.
Ultramafic rocks form in high temperature environments well below the surface of the earth. By the time they are exposed at the surface by uplift and erosion, ultramafic rocks may be partially to completely altered to serpentinite, a type of metamorphic rock. Sometimes the metamorphic conditions are right for the formation of chrysotile asbestos or tremolite-actinolite asbestos in bodies of ultramafic rock or along their boundaries. Note--occurrences of non-ultramafic rock types, such as gabbro or diabase, may be included within some of the ultramafic rock areas shown on this map. Asbestos is much less likely to be associated with these non-ultramafic rock types.
INFORMATION SOURCES
The ultramafic rock areas shown on this map are adapted from Jennings, C.W., 1977, Geologic Map of California, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map No. 2, scale 1:750,000. *Philpotts, A.R., 1990, Principles of igneous and metamorphic petrology, Figure 6-3, IUGS (International Union of Geological Sciences) classification of ultramafic rocks: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, page 96.
This map may be viewed on the California Department of Conservation website at http://www.consrv.ca.gov, which includes links to other sites with asbestos information.
MAP USAGE AND LIMITATIONS
The small scale of this map (1:1,000,000) precludes showing detailed boundaries of ultramafic rock units and small occurrences of ultramafic rocks. It should be used only as a general guide to the presence of ultramafic rocks that may contain asbestos. This map is derived from the Geologic Map of California (1:750,000 scale - one inch equals about 12 miles), Jennings (1977). No ultramafic rocks are shown in Solano and Madera counties on this map. However, ultramafic rocks are shown as present in these counties on available more detailed maps at scales of 1:250,000 (one inch equals about 4 miles) and larger. In addition to association with ultramafic rock and serpentinite, asbestos minerals are also known to occur in association with some faults in particular geologic settings, certain non-ultramafic related metamorphic rock types, and magnesium-rich carbonate rocks such as dolomite. These asbestos occurrences are much less common and their locations less well known than for ultramafic rocks.
Consequently, such occurrences are not shown on this map.
This map should not be used to determine whether bedrock or soil on a particular parcel of land in or adjacent to areas identified as ultramafic rocks contains asbestos. A site-specific investigation would be required to make such a determination.
Definitions
Asbestos -- Asbestos is the generic term for the naturally occurring fibrous (asbestiform) varieties of six silicate minerals. These minerals are: chrysotile, tremolite (when fibrous), actinolite (when fibrous), crocidolite (fibrous riebeckite), anthophyllite (when fibrous), and amosite (fibrous cummingonite-grunerite).
Chrysotile is the most common asbestos mineral in California and belongs to the serpentine mineral group. The remaining asbestos minerals belong to the amphibole mineral group. Asbestos also refers to an industrial product obtained by mining and processing deposits of the asbestiform minerals listed above.
Serpentine --The serpentine group minerals are hydrous magnesium silicate minerals, of which lizardite, antigorite and chrysotile are the most common.
Chrysotile forms crystals that are naturally fibrous. These fibers occur in serpentinite in small veins, where the fibers are oriented perpendicular to the vein walls (cross-fiber veins) or parallel to the vein walls (slip-fiber veins).
Chrysotile fibers are one type of asbestos. The other serpentine minerals usually do not occur as fibrous crystals and are not asbestos minerals. Although the term serpentine is commonly used to refer to the rock serpentinite, it is actually the name of the group of minerals that makes up the rock serpentinite.
Serpentinite -- Serpentinite is a rock consisting almost entirely of one or more serpentine minerals. Serpentinite is not identified as a separate rock unit on this map but is likely to be found within areas of ultramafic rock shown on the map.
This rock type has a greasy or waxy appearance and may be dark to light green, brown, yellow or white. In addition to serpentine minerals, small amounts of other minerals such as magnetite, chromite, talc, brucite, and tremolite-actinolite maybe present. Small amounts of chrysotile asbestos are common in serpentinite because chrysotile is one of the serpentine group minerals.
Tremolite-actinolite asbestos (amphibole asbestos) may also occur with serpentinite, but such occurrences are less common than chrysotile asbestos.
DISCLAIMER
The State of California and the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology make no representations or warranties as to the actual presence or absence of natural asbestos at specific sites within or near the ultramafic rock areas shown on this map. Further, the State and the Department make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of the data shown on the map. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or any third party on account of or arising from the use of this map.
VIEWING AND PRINTING TIPS
A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Viewing the map
This map opens up in Acrobat Reader in “fit window” view. When you wish to zoom in and look at areas at a higher magnification, there are several ways to do so:
1. Use the magnifying glass icon on the left-hand tool bar and zoom in at preset increments, or
2. Click on the View pull-down menu for a variety of zoom options, or
3. Use the pop-up menu on the lower left toolbar to set exact zoom parameters.
4. To zoom back out with the magnifying glass icon active, press ctrl/alt/spacebar and click the mouse, or
5. Go back to View pull-down menu and change view, or
6. Use pop-up menu on the lower left toolbar to change view.
Printing the map
If you try to print this map, you’ll find that Acrobat Reader will simply print the entire map at your printer’s default page size. The resulting print isn’t very useful if you can only print to an 8.5 x 11 inch page. To print portions of this map at 1:1,100,000 (the original scale of the map) you’ll need Acrobat Reader and a graphics program such as Microsoft Paint, Paint Shop Pro, Corel Draw or Mac Paint. Armed with these tools, do the following:
1. Use Adobe Acrobat Reader to open map file.
2. To select an area, open the document and zoom to 100% at the area of interest. Hold mouse button down (if you have three buttons on your mouse, click on the left one) on the Text Select tool button, which will expand to three buttons. Choose the “grab graphics” tool button (last one on the right). Using this tool, select your area of interest..
3. Click on the Edit pull-down menu and select Copy. This places a copy of the selected area onto your computer’s clipboard. At this point, you can close Adobe Acrobat if your paint program requires the memory to run. If not, you can leave it open.
4. Open your paint program. In Microsoft Paint, make sure that the image area is at least as wide or as tall as the map area that you’ve selected. Choose the Edit pull-down menu, and click on Paste. In Paint Shop Pro, select Paste as New Image. The selected map area will be pasted into the view and can be printed. This “bitmap” image may appear “pixilated” or have jagged edges.
To print the entire map at full-scale requires a large-format color plotter. If you don’t have one, many reproduction firms do, and can plot the file for you.
Appendix C – USGS Web Soil Survey
Soil Map—Contra Costa County, California
(Hercules Hotel Complex)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/6/2020
4207450 4207490 4207530 4207570 4207610 4207650
4207450 4207490 4207530 4207570 4207610 4207650
563960 564000 564040 564080 564120 564160 564200 564240 564280 564320 563960 564000 564040 564080 564120 564160 564200 564240 564280 564320 38° 0' 52'' N
122° 16' 17'' W
38° 0' 52'' N
122° 16' 1'' W
38° 0' 44'' N
122° 16' 17'' W
38° 0' 44'' N N 122° 16' 1'' W
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 25 50 100 150
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,700 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Contra Costa County, California
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 17, 2019
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 1, 2019—May 31, 2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Contra Costa County, California
(Hercules Hotel Complex)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/6/2020
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Cc Clear Lake clay, 0 to 15
percent slopes, MLRA 15
1.5 15.5%
SdE Sehorn clay, 15 to 30 percent
slopes
8.0 84.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 9.5 100.0%
Soil Map—Contra Costa County, California Hercules Hotel Complex Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/6/2020
Appendix D – City Directory Listings
Hercules Hotel Complex
Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez
Hercules, CA 94547
Inquiry Number: 5897647.5
December 11, 2019
The EDR-City Directory Image Report
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR
OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.
All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.
EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals.
RECORD SOURCES
EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report.
EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright.
RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.
Year Target Street Cross Street Source
2011 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
2006 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
2000 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1995 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1990 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1985 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1980 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
1975 Haines Criss-Cross Directory
5897647- 5 Page 1
FINDINGS
TARGET PROPERTY STREET
Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez
Hercules, CA 94547
Year CD Image Source
HWY 4
2011 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 2006 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 2000 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1995 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1990 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1985 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1980 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1975 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source HWY 80 E
2011 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 2006 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 2000 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1995 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1990 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1985 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1980 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1975 - Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 5897647- 5 Page 2
FINDINGS
CROSS STREETS
No Cross Streets Identified
5897647- 5 Page 3
Appendix E – Historic Aerial Photographs
5897647.8 1950 = 500'
5897647.8 1946 = 500'
5897647.8 1939 = 500'
5897647.8 1974 = 500'
5897647.8 1968 = 500'
5897647.8 1963 = 500'
5897647.8 1958 = 500'
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Inquiry Number: December 09, 20195897647.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2016 1"=500' Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2005 1"=500' Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP
1998 1"=500' Flight Date: August 27, 1998 USDA
1993 1"=500' Acquisition Date: July 06, 1993 USGS/DOQQ
1982 1"=500' Flight Date: July 08, 1982 USDA
1974 1"=500' Flight Date: April 30, 1974 USGS
1968 1"=500' Flight Date: April 20, 1968 USGS
1963 1"=500' Flight Date: July 17, 1963 EDR Proprietary Aerial Viewpoint 1958 1"=500' Flight Date: July 25, 1958 USGS
1950 1"=500' Flight Date: May 18, 1950 USDA
1946 1"=500' Flight Date: September 06, 1946 USGS
1939 1"=500' Flight Date: August 02, 1939 USDA
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 12/09/19 Hercules Hotel Complex Site Name: Client Name: Ground Zone Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez 1361 B Street Hercules, CA 94547 Hayward, CA 94540 EDR Inquiry # 5897647.8 Contact: Sam Lea Brathwaite Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5897647 - 8 page 2 5897647.8 2016 = 500'
5897647.8 2012 = 500'
5897647.8 2009 = 500'
5897647.8 2005 = 500'
5897647.8 1998 = 500'
5897647.8 1993 = 500'
5897647.8 1982 = 500'
Appendix F – Historical Topo Maps
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 December 09, 20195897647.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:
P.O.#
Project:
Maps Provided:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
Coordinates:
Latitude:
Longitude:
UTM Zone:
UTM X Meters:
UTM Y Meters:
Elevation:
Contact:
Site Name: Client Name:
2012
1980
1968
1959
1951, 1952
1949, 1950
1947, 1948
1916
1914
1902
12/09/19 Hercules Hotel Complex Ground Zone Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez 1361 B Street Hercules, CA 94547 Hayward, CA 94540 5897647.4 Sam Lea Brathwaite EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Ground Zone were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s.
NA 38.013174 38° 0' 47" North 235.A.01 -122.269108 -122° 16' 9" West Zone 10 North 564159.31 4207528.73 65.18' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5897647 4 2 page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
2012 Source Sheets
2012
Mare Island
7.5-minute, 24000
2012
Benicia
7.5-minute, 24000
2012
Richmond
7.5-minute, 24000
2012
Briones Valley
7.5-minute, 24000
1980 Source Sheets
1980
Mare Island
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1959
1980
Benicia
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1979
1980
Richmond
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1979
1968 Source Sheets
1968
Briones Valley
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1968
1968
Mare Island
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1968
1968
Benicia
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1968
1968
Richmond
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1968
1959 Source Sheets
1959
Mare Island
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1958
1959
Briones Valley
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1958
1959
Benicia
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1958
1959
Richmond
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1958
5897647 4 3
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1951, 1952 Source Sheets
1951
Mare Island
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1948
1952
Benicia
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1948
1949, 1950 Source Sheets
1949
Richmond
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1949
Briones Valley
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1949
Mare Island
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1948
1950
Benicia
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1948
1947, 1948 Source Sheets
1947
PORT CHICAGO
15-minute, 50000
1947
MARE ISLAND
15-minute, 50000
1948
CONCORD
15-minute, 50000
1948
SAN FRANCISCO
15-minute, 50000
1916 Source Sheets
1916
Mare Island
15-minute, 62500
5897647 4 4
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1914 Source Sheets
1914
MARE ISLAND
15-minute, 62500
1902 Source Sheets
1902
Napa
30-minute, 125000
5897647 4 5
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Mare Island, 2012, 7.5-minute
NE, Benicia, 2012, 7.5-minute
SE, Briones Valley, 2012, 7.5-minute
SW, Richmond, 2012, 7.5-minute
5897647 4 6
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1980 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Mare Island, 1980, 7.5-minute
NE, Benicia, 1980, 7.5-minute
SW, Richmond, 1980, 7.5-minute
5897647 4 7
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1968 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Mare Island, 1968, 7.5-minute
NE, Benicia, 1968, 7.5-minute
SE, Briones Valley, 1968, 7.5-minute
SW, Richmond, 1968, 7.5-minute
5897647 4 8
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1959 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Mare Island, 1959, 7.5-minute
NE, Benicia, 1959, 7.5-minute
SE, Briones Valley, 1959, 7.5-minute
SW, Richmond, 1959, 7.5-minute
5897647 4 9
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1951, 1952 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Mare Island, 1951, 7.5-minute
NE, Benicia, 1952, 7.5-minute
5897647 4 10
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1949, 1950 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Mare Island, 1949, 7.5-minute
NE, Benicia, 1950, 7.5-minute
SE, Briones Valley, 1949, 7.5-minute
SW, Richmond, 1949, 7.5-minute
5897647 4 11
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1947, 1948 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, MARE ISLAND, 1947, 15-minute
NE, PORT CHICAGO, 1947, 15-minute
SE, CONCORD, 1948, 15-minute
SW, SAN FRANCISCO, 1948, 15-minute
5897647 4 12
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1916 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Mare Island, 1916, 15-minute
5897647 4 13
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1914 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, MARE ISLAND, 1914, 15-minute
5897647 4 14
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E
SW S SE
NW N NE
1902 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 Ground Zone TP, Napa, 1902, 30-minute
5897647 4 15
Appendix G – Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Search Results
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Hercules Hotel Complex Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules, CA 94547 December 09, 20195897647.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:
Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
EDR Inquiry # Contact:
Site Name: Client Name:
Certification #
PO #
Project
12/09/19 Hyw 80 East and Hyw 4 To Martinez Hercules Hotel Complex Ground Zone 1361 B Street Hercules, CA 94547 5897647.3 Hayward, CA 94540 Sam Lea Brathwaite The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Ground Zone were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.
The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 177C-455C-A565 NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY 235.A.01 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found.
Certification #: 177C-455C-A565
Ground Zone (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5897647 3 2 Appendix H - City of Hercules Planning, Building & Public Works Department
From: "Shiva Matinpour" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Parcel # 406 070 042
Date: Mon, January 6, 2020 10:16 am
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "Lori Martin" <[email protected]>
Good Morning Mr. Jones,
This is a private property owned by Hercules Hotel Development LLC Owner Address:1365 Murchison Drive Millbrae, CA 94030
Please contact them for information you need.
Sincerely,
Shiva Matinpour
Planning, Building & Public Works Department
City of Hercules
Tel: 510 799 8244
Fax: 510 799 8249
Please be advised City offices are closed on Fridays. Thank you for your patience.
Attachments:
untitled-[1]
Size: 0.4 k
Type: text/plain
From: "Tony Jones" <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Records Request
Date: Mon, December 30, 2019 7:19 pm
To: [email protected]
For the property located at the southwest quadrant of Hwy 80 east and Hwy 4 east (APN: 406-070-042), please make available all hazardous material use, storage, or disposal records, including but not limited to: permit applications, enforcement actions, permits, environmental reviews, inspections, emergency response actions, etc.
Thank you.
Tony Jones J.D., QSD, QISP
Ground Zone Environmental Services LLC
1361 B Street, Hayward, CA 94542
www.GroundZoneES.com
Phone: (510) 582-4212
Fax: (510) 244-7996
Cell: (209) 404-2433
Appendix I - City of Hercules Fire Department
From: "Tammy Tomas" <[email protected]>
Subject: Parcel # 406 070 042
Date: Tue, January 14, 2020 10:18 am
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Regarding parcel # 406 070 042 in Hercules, CA; this department has no record of any hazardous materials, spills, leaks, emergency responses, fires, or disposal of waste at this location.
Thank you,
Tammy Tomas
Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District
1680 Refugio Valley Road
Hercules, CA 94547
510-799-4561
www.rhfd.org
Attachments:
untitled-[1]
Size: 0.3 k
Type: text/plain
From: "Tony Jones" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Public Records Request
Date: Mon, January 13, 2020 2:37 pm
To: [email protected]
This request was first submitted on December 30, 2019. Please process:
Please make available for review and/or copy (or send by email to [email protected]
), any records held by this department for the
property at Assessor Parcel Number 406 070 042 located at the southeast quadrant of Interstate 80 East offramp to Highway 4 East.
Please include all records related to hazardous material, spills, leaks, emergency response, fires, or disposal of waste at this location.
Thank you.
> See request attached.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Tony Jones J.D., QSD, QISP
> Ground Zone Environmental Services LLC
> 1361 B Street, Hayward, CA 94542
> www.GroundZoneES.com
> Phone: (510) 582-4212
> Fax: (510) 244-7996
> Cell: (209) 404-2433
Tony Jones J.D., QSD, QISP
Ground Zone Environmental Services LLC
1361 B Street, Hayward, CA 94542
www.GroundZoneES.com
Phone: (510) 582-4212
Fax: (510) 244-7996
Cell: (209) 404-2433
Appendix J - Bay Area Air Quality Control District
From: "Public Records" <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Records Request No. 2019-12-0226
Date: Fri, January 10, 2020 3:02 pm
To: "Tony Jones" <[email protected]>
Dear Tony Jones,
Thank you for your request. We are unable to provide the records you requested for:
Hercules Hotel Complex
N/A
Hercules
This request did not include sufficient information to identify specific records and therefore we are unable to process. If you have any questions or concerns, please call or e-mail me.
Best,
Magnolia Vinluan-Chan for
Rochelle Henderson
Public Records Section
BAAQMD
415-516-1916
Attachments:
untitled-[1]
Size: 0.4 k
Type: text/plain
Home (/) > Public Records List (/public-records-list/) > Public Records List Details Public Records List Details
Request Type *
Other Information
Facility Name (Optional, if known, please include)
Hercules Hotel Complex
Facility Street
N/A
Facility City
Hercules
Facility State
California
Facility Zipcode (if known)
N/A
Request Details
Air District Facility ID (if known)
Period Covered
For Office Use Only *
N/A, Hercules
Print Outs
Episode
Permit Application
Violation
Complaint
—
—
Brief Description (3000 character limit) (Optional)
This is a correction to, and superceds my previous request for this Hercules Hotel Complex.
For the location at the southwest quadrant of the Hwy 80 East to Hwy 4 East to Martinez (Hercules Ca), please make available (electronic delivery preferred) all records related to the site, including: permit applications, citations, warnings, letters, inspection reports, etc.
The location is not developed and does not appear to have ever been developed.
Site Location:
Lat: 38.013379°
Lon: -122.268879°
Requested Delivery Method
Electronic Copy
I will be sending additional documentation for this request.
Appendix K - Contra Costa County Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs
From: "ccchazmat" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Public Records Request
Date: Thu, January 2, 2020 10:43 am
To: "Tony Jones" <[email protected]>
Good Morning:
We have no records for APN 406-070-042 @ Bayberry Ave, Hercules.
Our records go back to 1986, anything prior to this would be the jurisdiction of the local fire department.
FYI: CalEPA has a new website that combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single, searchable database and interactive map. By combining data from a variety of state and federal databases, the portal provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California.
The link to the CalEPA Regulated Site Portal is: https://siteportal.calepa.ca.gov/nsite/ Kind Regards,
Alex McMullen, Clerical Supervisor
Contra Costa Health Services
Hazardous Materials Programs
4585 Pacheco Blvd., Suite 100
Martinez, CA 94553
(925) 335-3200 Phone
(925) 646-2073 Fax
[email protected]
From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:49 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Public Records Request
Please see attached request.
Tony Jones J.D., QSD, QISP
Ground Zone Environmental Services LLC
1361 B Street, Hayward, CA 94542
www.GroundZoneES.com
Phone: (510) 582-4212
Fax: (510) 244-7996
Cell: (209) 404-2433
Attachments:
untitled-[1]
Size: 1.4 k
Type: text/plain
Public Records Request Form
Date: ____________
Name: _______________________________ Business Name: ______________________ Address: ______________________________ Phone #: ____________________________ _______________________________ E-mail: ____________________________ I am requesting the following public record(s) from Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs.
RECORD(S) REQUESTED: (Use additional form (s) if more space is needed) Our records are available electronically. Please choose one of the methods below:
Please copy the record(s) and send FedEx to the above mailing address.
The cost is $15.00 and is payable by check or credit card (Visa, Discover or M/C).
Please copy the record(s) and notify me when ready for pick up.
The cost is $3.00 and is payable by check or cash (MUST BE EXACT).
If you would like us to provide a list of sites in our database, please choose:
Please copy all “Active” or “Inactive” sites from database Cost: $15.00
You may email the completed form to [email protected], or mail or hand deliver to Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs at 4585 Pacheco Blvd., Suite 100, Martinez, CA 94553; or FAX to (925) 646-2073.
______________________________________________________________________________ Office Use Only:
Date Received________ Completed________ □No records exist responsive to this request.
Picked Up________ or FedEx________ XR_______________ Time Spent________ Rev. April 2018
SR#______________
(office use only)
Appendix L - San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board— GeoTracker Database
SITE NAME GLOBAL ID FAC ID SITE_TYPE STATUS ADDRESS CITY LATITUDE LONGITUDE AT&T CALIFORNIA - WB185 07-000-716428 1540 SYCAMORE AVE HERCULES 38.00908 -122.271 BUILDING ASSOCIATES INC T0601300533 LUST CLEANUP SITE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 100 JASPER CT HERCULES 38.00744 -122.275 CALTRANS HERCULES L10001703915 LAND DISPOSAL SITE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1369 BAYBERRY ROAD MAINTENANCE STATION HERCULES 38.01185 -122.262 CALTRANS HERCULES MAINTENANCE STATION T0601391848 LUST CLEANUP SITE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1369 BAYBERRY AVE HERCULES 38.01305 -122.273 CARONE BROS INC T0601300610 LUST CLEANUP SITE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1350 BAYBERRY WY HERCULES 38.0062 -122.263 CENTEX HOMES OF CALIFORNIA 7650001 7650001 STATE RESPONSE OR NPL CERTIFIED BETWEEN I-80 AND SAN PABLO AVENUE HERCULES 38.00941 -122.279 FORMER PG&E HERCULES PUMPING STATION T10000006209 CLEANUP PROGRAM SITE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 4200 SAN PABLO AVENUE HERCULES 38.01789 -122.272 GELSAR 7280162 7280162 VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CERTIFIED SAN PABLO AVENUE/SYCAMORE AVENUE HERCULES 38.01417 -122.278 HERCULES INC7280156 7280156 STATE RESPONSE OR NPL CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE CORNER OF SAN PABLO & SYCAMORE AVENUE HERCULES 38.01341 -122.28 HERCULES MIDDLE SCHOOL 7000005 7000005 SCHOOL NO FURTHER ACTION SYCAMORE AVENUE/WILLET STREET HERCULES 38.0161 -122.282 HERCULES SHELL 07-000-772052 3900 SAN PABLO AVE HERCULES 38.01254 -122.274 PACIFIC BELLT0601300642 LUST CLEANUP SITE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 1540 SYCAMORE AVE HERCULES 38.0101 -122.272 WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT T0601300532 LUST CLEANUP SITE COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED 100 SYCAMORE AVE HERCULES 38.01276 -122.273 Back to Top Conditions of Use Privacy Policy Accessibility Contact Us Copyright © 2015 State of California
CALTRANS HERCULES MAINTENANCE STATION (T0601391848) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL ALERTS 1369 BAYBERRY AVE
HERCULES, CA 94572
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT
CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) (LEAD) - CASE #: 07-0817 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - CASE #: 07-0817
CASEWORKER: SUE LOYD
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY
CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 9/26/2002 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN
GASOLINE
POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN
UNDER INVESTIGATION
FILE LOCATION DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS MUN
DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
San Pablo - Pinole (206.60)
Site History
No site history available
Summary Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases Tools Reports UST Case Closures Information
Back to Top Conditions of Use Privacy Policy Accessibility Contact Us Copyright © 2015 State of California
WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT (T0601300532) - (MAP) SIGN UP FOR EMAIL ALERTS 100 SYCAMORE AVE
HERCULES, CA 94547
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
LUST CLEANUP SITE (INFO)
PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY / CSM REPORT
CLEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES
SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2) (LEAD) - CASE #: 07-0576 CASEWORKER: MARTIN MUSONGE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - CASE #: 57912
CASEWORKER: SUE LOYD
Regulatory Profile PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY
CLEANUP STATUS - DEFINITIONS
COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED AS OF 12/3/2008 - CLEANUP STATUS HISTORY
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN
GASOLINE
POTENTIAL MEDIA OF CONCERN
OTHER GROUNDWATER (USES OTHER THAN DRINKING WATER)
FILE LOCATION DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BENEFICIAL USE(S) - DEFINITIONS MUN
DWR GROUNDWATER SUB-BASIN NAME CALWATER WATERSHED NAME
San Pablo - Pinole (206.60)
Site History
No site history available
Summary Case Reviews Cleanup Action Report Regulatory Activities Environmental Data (ESI) Site Maps / Documents Community Involvement Related Cases
Tools Reports UST Case Closures Information
Appendix M – Site Reconnaissance Photo Log
Hercules Hotel Complex
December 12, 2019
Site Reconnaissance Photo Log
Photo 1 – Concrete foundation block at entrance to site off Willow Ave.
Photo 2 – Fill soil located in several areas of site
Photo 3– Western perimeter of site along Interstate 80 to the right Photo 4 – Drainage vent or well along former drainage area Photo 5 – Culvert at southwestern perimeter of site
Photo 6 – Municipal water and electrical utilities
Photo 7 – Drainage vent or well
Photo 8 – Non-hazardous rash at the site
Photo 9 – 60-inch corrugated steel culvert with headwall at northwestern perimeter Photo 10 – Drainage ditch and wetland at northern area of site Photo 11 – Stormwater slope drain from Interstate 80 offramp SDI Photo 12 – 60-inch CSP and headwall at northeast perimeter of site Photo 13 – SDI in offramp median offsite draining to site Photo 14 – SDI and drain from offramp to site
Appendix N – Environmental Questionnaire
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE – PROPERTY MANAGER OF 900 WELCH ROAD, PALO ALTO Project/Site Information
Project Street Address Willow Road – Hercules Hotel Complex City City of Hercules
Zip Code
Contact Information
Contact Name
Telephone No. email
Years
Associated
w/Site
Property
Owner
Arvind Desai (650) 455 -
2105 [email protected]
Property
Manager
Property Use and Specifications
Single-Family Residential Vacant or undeveloped
Multi-Family Residential Agricultural specify type
Commercial Office Industrial specify type
Commercial retail Other specify type:
Provide General Site Description
Provide all Know current and former addresses and Parcel Numbers:
Total Property Size: Original Construction Date:
Total Number of Buildings: None Was Construction Phased? Yes No Unk.
Total Square Feet of Building: Dates of Renovation:
Are there any plans for site redevelopment or change in use? yes No, if yes describe N/A
Are there any bodies of water on or immediately adjacent to the site? X yes No, if yes describe Electricity Provider: N/A Gas Provider: N/A
Heating System Fuel Source(s): N/A
Cooling System Power Source: N/A
Potable Water Source/Provider: N/A Sanitary Sewer Provider: N?A Any Waste Discharged at the Site? No
Septic Tank/Leachfield Sanitary Sewer Other
Occupants/Tenants
Current Occupants(s)/Tenant(s)
Length of
Occupancy Brief description of on-site operations
Has the subject site ever been occupied by the following: No Dry Cleaner Gas Station Printing Facility Manufacturing Facility , if yes, provide length of occupancy Have any previous investigations been performed at the subject site XYes NO , If yes provide available reports If yes provide type and describe: Phase I Phase II Asbestos Lead Radon On-Site Environmental Conditions
Are you aware of any of the following environmental conditions, either current or former, on the subject site? Note: If applicable, please provide inventory records, inspection records and material safety data sheets to site inspector during site inspection
Environmental Condition/Issue Response Notes on Yes Responses Above ground storage tanks yes No
Underground Storage Tanks yes No
Hazardous/Toxic Substances yes No
Stored Chemicals yes No
Chemical Spills/Releases yes No
Dump Areas/Landfills yes No
Waste Treatment Systems yes No
Wastewater Discharges yes No
Floor Drains/DIs yes No
Pits, Ponds, Lagoons yes No
Stained Soil/Vegetation yes No
Pesticide/Herbicide Use yes No
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) yes No
Electrical Transformers yes No
Hydraulic Lifts yes No
Elevators yes No
Asbestos yes X No
Lead-based paint yes X No
Oil/Gas Wells yes No
Environmental Clean-ups yes No
Environmental Permits yes X No
Other Environmental Conditions
Are you aware of any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the property?
yes No
If yes, provide brief explanation
Are you aware of any pending, threatened, or past administration proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the property? property? yes No
If yes, provide brief explanation
Are you aware of any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products? yes No
If yes, provide brief explanation
Are you aware of any incidents of flooding, leaks, or other water intrusion, and/or complaints related to indoor air quality?
yes No
If yes, provide brief explanation
Are you aware of any cases of extreme water damage or mold throughout the building(s)? yes No
If yes, provide brief explanation
The preparer of this form must complete the following required information.
This questionnaire was completed by:
Name: Arvind Desai