City Council
City of Hermosa Beach
Regular Meeting Agenda - Final
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA
90254
Mayor
Michael Detoy
Mayor Pro Tem
Raymond Jackson
Councilmembers
Stacey Armato
Mary Campbell
Justin Massey
Tuesday, January 25, 2022 5:00 PM
Face masks required for all in-person attendance.
Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.
Open Session - 6:00 P.M.
Duly posted on January 21, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. by S.M.
1 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022
VIEWING OPTIONS FOR PUBLIC MEETINGS
Public meetings are broadcast live on Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach. Additional viewing options are provided as a courtesy.
ZOOM: Join the meeting link if available or participate by phone YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 CITY WEBSITE: www.hermosabeach.gov and visit the Agendas/Minutes/Videos page ***PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU EXPERIENCE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES WHILE VIEWING THE
MEETING ON ONE OF THESE PLATFORMS, PLEASE TRY ONE OF THE OTHER VIEWING OPTIONS***
All council meetings are open to the public. PLEASE ATTEND.
The Council receives a packet with detailed information and recommendations on nearly every agenda item. City Council agenda packets are available for your review on the City's website located at www.hermosabeach.gov. Complete agenda packets are also available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office.
During the meeting, a packet is also available in the Council Chambers foyer or you can access the packet at our website, www.hermosabch.org, on your laptop, tablet or smartphone through the wireless signal available in the City Council chambers - Network ID: CHB-Guest, Password: chbguest To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) will be available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at (310) 318-0204 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 Printed on 3/26/2024
2 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
(LOCATION: Meetings convene in the Council Chambers and move to the Second Floor Conference Room after Public Comment)
CALL TO ORDER IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Hybrid virtual/in-person meetings are held pursuant to AB361. State and local officials recommend measures to promote social distancing. Members of the public may email comments to [email protected] or submit eComments until 3:00 p.m. on the meeting date.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS: 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach (Face mask required for all in-person attendance)
JOIN THE VIRTUAL MEETING AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828?pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT09 OR PARTICIPATE BY PHONE:
• Toll Free: 833-548-0276
• Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #
• Passcode: 472825
ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED.
If you are joining by phone, press * 9 to raise your virtual hand and * 6 to unmute your line when asked to do so. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker.
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION IN SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM a. 22-0063 MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on January 11, 2022.
b. 22-0051 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Pending Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Name of Case: Name of Case: Lejins v. City of Long Beach Case Number: S272594, California Supreme Court
Consideration whether to join multiple cities requesting Supreme Court review.
RECESS TO OPEN SESSION
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 Printed on 3/26/2024
3 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 6:00 P.M. - REGULAR AGENDA
Hybrid virtual/in-person meetings are held pursuant to AB361. State and local officials recommend measures to promote social distancing. Members of the public may email comments to [email protected] or submit eComments until 3:00 p.m. on the meeting date.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS: 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach (Face mask required for all in-person attendance)
JOIN THE VIRTUAL MEETING AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828?pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT09 OR PARTICIPATE BY PHONE:
• Toll Free: 833-548-0276
• Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #
• Passcode: 472825
ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED.
If you are joining by phone, press * 9 to raise your virtual hand and * 6 to unmute your line when asked to do so. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker.
Oral and Written Communication
Persons who wish to have written materials included in the agenda packet at the time the agenda is published on the City's website must submit the written materials to the City Manager's office by email ([email protected]) or in person by noon of the Tuesday, one week before the meeting date.
Written materials pertaining to matters listed on the posted agenda received after the agenda has been posted will be added as supplemental materials under the relevant agenda item on the City's website at the same time as they are distributed to the City Council by email. Supplemental materials may be submitted via eComment (instructions below) or emailed to [email protected].
Supplemental materials must be received before 3:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting to ensure Council and staff have the ability to review materials prior to the meeting. Supplemental materials submitted after 3:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting or submitted during the meeting will be posted online the next day.
Submit Supplemental eComments in three easy steps:
Note: Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information (i.e. phone numbers, addresses, etc) that you do not want to be published.
1. Go to the Agendas/Minutes/Video webpage and find the meeting you’d like to submit comments on.
Click on the eComment button for your selected meeting.
2. Find the agenda item for which you would like to provide a comment and select the comment button.
3. Sign in to your SpeakUp Hermosa Account or as a guest, enter your name and comment in the fields provided. If you have an account, you may attach files before submitting your comment.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 Printed on 3/26/2024
4 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
V. ANNOUNCEMENTS - UPCOMING CITY EVENTS
VI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:This is the time for the City Council to change the order in which it takes up items on this agenda, remove and/or continue agenda items and pull items from the consent calendar for separate consideration.
VII. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
a. 22-0039 COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM
BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT
b. 22-0049 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION PRESENTS AWARD TO
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
VIII. CITY MANAGER REPORT - The City Manager and staff may provide brief reports on pending City business. Longer oral reports to be provided are as follows:
a. 22-0040 POLICE CHIEF UPDATE
IX. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -- ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC: This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction not on this agenda, on items on this agenda as to which public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Reports Consent Calendar items that are not pulled for separate consideration and Future Agenda Items), on written communications, and to request the removal of an item from the consent calendar. Public comments on the agenda items called City Manager Reports, City Councilmembers Reports, Consent Calendar items that are not pulled for separate consideration and Future Agenda Items will only be heard at this time. Further, comments on public hearing items are heard only during the public hearing. Members of the audience may also speak during discussion of items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration; during Public Hearings; and, during discussion of items appearing under Municipal Matters.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 Printed on 3/26/2024
5 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 All comments from the public under this agenda item are limited to three minutes per speaker, but this time allotment may be reduced due to time constraints. The City Council acknowledges receipt of the written communications listed below. No action will be taken on matters raised in oral and written communications, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised in oral and written communications for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager.
a. 22-0050 WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the written communication.
X. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS: Councilmembers may briefly respond to public comments, may ask a question for clarification or make a brief announcement or report on his or her own activities or meetings attended. a. 23-0041 UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES
AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES
XI. CONSENT CALENDAR: The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council.
Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any consent calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration prior to the vote on the consent calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item prior to the vote on the consent calendar. Items removed will be considered under Agenda Item XII (12), with public comment permitted at that time. The title is deemed to be read and further reading waived of any ordinance listed on the consent calendar for introduction or adoption. a. REPORT
22-0038
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
(Interim City Clerk Susan Morrow)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council approve the following minutes:
1. January 11, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting
b. REPORT
22-0042
CHECK REGISTERS
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council ratify the following check registers.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 Printed on 3/26/2024
6 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 c. REPORT
22-0048
MEMORANDUM REGARDING
REVENUE REPORT, COVID-19 REVENUE REPORTS,
EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT
FOR DECEMBER 2022
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
d. REPORT
22-0047
MEMORANDUM REGARDING
CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT
(City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
e. REPORT
22-0046
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
AS OF JANUARY 13, 2022
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of January 13, 2022.
f. REPORT
22-0045
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2021
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of November 17, 2021.
g. REPORT
22-0015
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 2022
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the canceled Planning Commission meeting of January 18, 2022.
h. REPORT
22-0017
PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council receive and file the February 15, 2022 Planning Commission tentative future agenda items.
i. REPORT
22-0037
FINDINGS TO HOLD REMOTE TELECONFERENCE/MEETINGS,
PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
(Interim City Clerk Susan Morrow)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council authorize remote teleconference/virtual meetings of all City of Hermosa Beach legislative bodies in accordance with Assembly Bill 361 ("AB 361"), by finding that: (1) a statewide state of emergency is currently in place; (2) state and local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID-19; and meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 Printed on 3/26/2024
7 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 j. REPORT
22-0036
APPROVAL OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF SPECIAL EVENT
LONG-TERM AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE JEWISH
COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE COMMUNITY CHANUKAH
CELEBRATION AND THE GREAT AUTOS OF YESTERYEAR FOR
THE ENDLESS SUMMER CLASSIC CAR SHOW
(Community Resources Manager Lisa Nichols)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council approve the commencement of special event long-term agreement negotiations with the following organizations:
1. The Jewish Community Center for its Community Chanukah Celebration; and
2. The Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show.
XII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION - Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be handled separately.
Public comment will be taken prior to Council deliberation and action on each item pulled from the Consent Calendar.
XIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M.
NONE
XIV. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
a. REPORT
22-0034
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 689 CLARK BUILDING RENOVATIONS
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council:
1. Approve the Clark Building Renovations final plans; and
2. Appropriate $747,033 from the Capital Improvement Fund to the CIP 689 project budget for the construction phase of the project.
b. REPORT
22-0035
DESIGNATION OF A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FEE WAIVERS TO BE
GRANTED FOR SPECIAL EVENTS HELD IN 2022
(Community Resources Manager Lisa Nichols)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council designate a maximum amount of $20,000 in fee waivers to be granted for special events held in 2022, as per the City's Special Event Fee Waiver Policy.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 Printed on 3/26/2024
8 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 c. REPORT
22-0043
DISCUSSION OF NEXT STEPS TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE
CITY’S GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GOALS
AND CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY
CHOICE AGGREGATION OPTIONS
(Environmental Programs Manager Doug Krauss)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council:
1. Discuss Community Choice Aggregation options as a means of reducing emissions to meet the City's carbon neutrality goal;
2. Provide staff direction to return to Council with a fuller treatment of one or more Community Choice Aggregation options and/or authorize the City Manager to sign an authorization to proceed with Clean Power Alliance to conduct an applicant impact study for $10,000 (Attachment 5); and
3. Authorize a move to Southern California Edison's 100 percent Green Rates for municipal facilities at an estimated annual cost of $15,000. d. REPORT
22-0044
DISCUSSION OF ENCROACHMENT FEES FOR TEMPORARY
OUTDOOR DINING PERMIT PROGRAM
(Environmental Programs Manager Doug Krauss)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council consider the information presented by staff and provide direction regarding possible fees for the City's temporary outdoor dining permit programs. e. REPORT
22-0061
UPDATE REGARDING THE PARKING STUDY
SESSION SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON JANUARY 31, 2022
(City Manager Suja Lowenthal)
Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council:
1. Receive an update regarding the parking study session scheduled to be held on January 31, 2022; and
2. Provide staff direction on whether to schedule a special meeting of the City Council following the parking study session to discuss and decide whether to postpone the 2022-2023 Residential and Employee parking permit sales and renewals to allow for a review of the current rates.
XV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - Requests from Councilmembers for possible future agenda items and questions from Councilmembers regarding the status of future agenda items. No discussion or debate of these requests shall be undertaken; the sole action is whether to schedule the item for consideration on a future agenda. No public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The existing list of future agenda items below is for information only.
a. 22-0052 TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 Printed on 3/26/2024
9 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022
FUTURE MEETINGS AND CITY HOLIDAYS
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS:
January 31, 2022 -Monday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - Parking Study Session
February 8, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
February 22, 2022 - No meeting due to lack of quorum
March 3, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - Revenue Study Session
March 8, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
March 22, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
March 31, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - ADA Study Session
April 12, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
April 21, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - FY 2022-2023 CIP Study Session
April 26, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
May 10, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
May 24, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
June 2, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - Budget Study Session
June 14, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
June 28, 2022 - No meeting due to lack of quorum
July 12, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
July 21, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Joint meeting with all Boards/Commissions
July 26, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
August 4, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - Study Session
August 9, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
City of Hermosa Beach Page 10 Printed on 3/26/2024
10 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - CONTINUED:
August 23, 2022 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark for Summer Break) September 1, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - Study Session
September 13, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
September 27, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
October 11, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
October 22, 2022 -Saturday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
8:00 AM - City Council Retreat
October 25, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session,
6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
November 3, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - Regular Meeting
November 8, 2022 - No meeting due to lack of quorum (General Election) November 22, 2022 - No meeting due to lack of quorum (Thanksgiving week) November 29, 2022 -Tuesday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - Regular Meeting (Installation of new officers) December 1, 2022 -Thursday - Adjourned Regular Meeting:
6:00 PM - Mayor Transition Ceremony & Reception
December 13, 2022 - Tuesday - 5:00 PM - Closed Session, 6:00 PM - City Council Meeting
December 27, 2022 - Tuesday - No Meeting (Dark for WInter Break) City of Hermosa Beach Page 11 Printed on 3/26/2024
11 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda - Final January 25, 2022 BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS:
February 1, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting February 7, 2022 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting February 15, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting March 7, 2022 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting March 15, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting March 16, 2022 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting April 4, 2022 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting April 5, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting April 19, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 2, 2022 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting May 3, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting May 17, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting May 18, 2022 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting June 6, 2022 - Monday - 6:00 PM - Economic Development Committee Meeting June 16, 2022 - Thursday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting June 21, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting July 5, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting July 19, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting July 20, 2022 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting August 2, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting August 16, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 6, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting September 20, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting September 21, 2022 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting October 6, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting October 18, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 1, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting November 15, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting November 16 - Wednesday - 6:00 PM - Public Works Commission Meeting December 6, 2022 - Tuesday - 7:00 PM - Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting December 20, 2022 - Tuesday - 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting CITY OFFICES CLOSED FRIDAY-SUNDAY AND ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS:
February 21, 2022 - Monday - President's Day
May 30, 2022 - Monday - Memorial Day
July 4, 2022 - Monday - Independence Day
September 5, 2022 - Monday - Labor Day
November 24, 2022 - Thursday - Thanksgiving Day
December 26, 2022 - Monday - Christmas Day (observed)
January 2, 2023 - Monday - New Year's Day (observed)
City of Hermosa Beach Page 12 Printed on 3/26/2024
12 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
22-0063
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Closed Session of January 25, 2022
MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on January 11, 2022.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 13
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
22-0051
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Closed Session of January 25, 2022
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Pending Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Name of Case: Name of Case: Lejins v. City of Long Beach Case Number: S272594, California Supreme Court
Consideration whether to join multiple cities requesting Supreme Court review.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 14
B305134
Court of Appeals of California
Lejins v. City of Long Beach
Decided Dec 1, 2021
B305134 B306506
12-01-2021
DIANA LEJINS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, Defendant and
Appellant.
CHANEY, J.
Charles Parkin, City Attorney, Howard D. Russell,
Principal Deputy City Attorney, Richard Anthony,
Deputy City Attorney; Jarvis, Fay & Gibson,
Benjamin P. Fay, and Gabriel McWhirter for
Defendant and Appellant. Colantuono, Highsmith
& Whatley, Michael G. Colantuono, and Matthew
C. Slentz, for League of California Cities as
Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and
Appellant. Benink & Slavens, Eric J. Benink, and
Vincent D. Slavens for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court
of Los Angeles County No. 18STCP02628 James
C. Chalfant, Judge. Affirmed.
Charles Parkin, City Attorney, Howard D. Russell,
Principal Deputy City Attorney, Richard Anthony,
Deputy City Attorney; Jarvis, Fay & Gibson,
Benjamin P. Fay, and Gabriel McWhirter for
Defendant and Appellant.
Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, Michael G.
Colantuono, and Matthew C. Slentz, for League of
California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of
Defendant and Appellant.
Benink & Slavens, Eric J. Benink, and Vincent D.
1 Slavens for Plaintiffs and Respondents. *1
CHANEY, J.
Diana Lejins and Angela Kimball (collectively,
Plaintiffs) filed a petition for writ of mandate in
the trial court, challenging a surcharge defendant
City of Long Beach (the City) imposes on its
water and sewer customers by embedding the
surcharge in the rates the Long Beach Water
Department (the Water Department) charges its
customers for service. The surcharge covers
transfers of funds from the Water Department to
the City's general fund, to be used for unrestricted
general revenue purposes. The City contends the
surcharge was legally imposed because it was
approved by a majority of the City's voters
pursuant to article XIII C of the California
Constitution. Plaintiffs argue notwithstanding
majority voter approval, the surcharge violates
article XIII D, which prohibits a local agency from
assessing a fee or charge "upon any parcel of
property or upon any person as an incident of
property ownership" unless the fee or charge
satisfies enumerated requirements the City
acknowledges were not met here. (Art. XIII D, §§
3, subd. (a) & 6, subd. (b).) The trial court entered
judgment in favor of Plaintiffs, concluding the
surcharge is unconstitutional and invalid under
article XIII D for the reason Plaintiffs advance. As
explained below, we agree with Plaintiffs'
argument and affirm the judgment and postjudgment order awarding attorney fees to Plaintiffs. *2
1 2 2
1 Undesignated article references are to the
California Constitution.
2 Plaintiffs also argue, and the trial court also
concluded, the surcharge is
unconstitutional and invalid under article
1 15
XI, section 7 to the extent the City collects
the surcharge from water and sewer utility
customers who receive service at a location
outside the City. We need not reach this
issue based on our holding the surcharge is
unconstitutional and invalid as to all
customers under article XIII D.
BACKGROUND
I. Proposition 218 - A Brief Overview
In 1996, California voters adopted Proposition
218, the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," which
added articles XIII C and XIII D-the California
Constitution provisions the parties reference in
this action. As our Supreme Court has explained:"
'Proposition 218 can best be understood against its
historical background, which begins in 1978 with
the adoption of Proposition 13, '" which added
article XIII A. (Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles
County, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (2001) 24
Cal.4th 830, 836 (Apartment Assn.).) Among other
things, Proposition 213" 'limited ad valorem
property taxes to 1 percent of a property's assessed
valuation and limited increases in the assessed
valuation to 2 percent per year unless and until the
property changed hands;'" it also prohibited local
governments" 'from enacting any special tax
without a two-thirds vote of the electorate.'" (Ibid.;
art. XIII A, §§ 1, 2 & 4.)
Article XIII D, added in 1996 by Proposition
218," 'allows only four types of local property
taxes: (1) an ad valorem property tax; (2) a special
tax; (3) an assessment; and (4) a fee or charge'" for
a property-related service. (Apartment Assn.,
supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 837; art. XIII D, § 3, subd.
(a), ¶¶ (1)-(4).) Proposition 218" 'buttresses
Proposition 13's limitations on ad valorem
property taxes and special taxes by placing
analogous restrictions on assessments, fees, and
charges.'" (Ibid.) The parties here agree the
Measure M surcharge does not constitute an ad
valorem property tax, a special tax, or an
assessment; as discussed below, they disagree
whether it constitutes a fee or *3 charge "assessed
by any agency upon any parcel of property or
upon any person as an incident of property
ownership," subject to article XIII D's restrictions.
(Art. XIII D, § 3.) A "property-related fee [or
charge] violates article XIII D if [among other
things] the revenues derived from the fee [or
charge] exceed the amount required to provide the
property-related service [(art. XIII D, § 6, subd.
(b), ¶ (1))]"; "if revenues derived from the fee [or
charge] are used for any purpose other than that
for which it was imposed (see art. XIII D, § 6,
subd. (b)(2)) or if the fee [or charge] is imposed
for general governmental services (see art. XIII D,
§ 6, subd. (b)(5))." (Citizens for Fair REU Rates v.
City of Redding (2018) 6 Cal.5th 1, 14 (Redding).)
3 Article XIII C, added in 1996 by Proposition 218,
"restricts the authority of local governments to
impose taxes by, among other things, requiring
voter approval of all taxes imposed by local
governments." (City of San Buenaventura v.
United Water Conservation Dist. (2017) 3 Cal.5th
1191, 1200.) As defined in article XIII C, a
general tax is "any tax imposed for general
governmental purposes," and a special tax is "any
tax imposed for specific purposes, including a tax
imposed for specific purposes, which is placed
into a general fund." (Art. XIII C, § 1, subds. (a)
& (d).) "Article XIII C buttresses article XIII D by
limiting the other methods by which local
governments can exact revenue using fees and
taxes not based on real property value or
ownership." (Redding, supra, 6 Cal.5th at p. 10.)
"As a constitutional initiative, Proposition 218 is
binding upon charter cities," such as the City here.
(Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of San
Diego (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 374, 391, italics
4 omitted.) *4
II. The City and Its Water Department
The City is governed by the Long Beach City
Charter (Charter), which created its Water
Department at article XIV, section 1400 et seq. of
the Charter. The City's Water Department, which
is not a legal entity separate from the City,
2 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 16 provides water and sewer services to most of the
City's residents and businesses and to a small
number of customers located in nearby cities or
unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. At
all relevant times, plaintiff Diana Lejins has
resided in the City and is a water and sewer
customer of the Water Department; and plaintiff
Angela Kimball has resided in an unincorporated
area of Los Angeles County and is a water
customer of the Water Department.
The Water Department is managed by a fivemember Board of Water Commissioners (the Board). (Charter, art. XIV, § 1400.) One of the
Board's powers, as provided in the Charter, is to
fix rates charged for water and sewer services. The
rates ultimately must be approved by the City
Council. (Id. at § 1403(5)-(6).) Monies collected
from customers for water service are accounted
for and initially maintained in the City's Water
Revenue Fund, and monies collected from
customers for sewer service are accounted for and
initially maintained in the City's Sewer Revenue
Fund. (Id. at §§ 1403(13) & 1407.)
As described in the record on appeal, there is a
long history in the City of transferring revenues
from the City's utilities to the City's general fund
to help support general City services, such as
police, fire, library, and parks.
III. Prior Litigation and Settlement
The City devised the surcharge at issue in this case
to account for a reduction of general fund revenue
that resulted *5 after Diana Lejins (one of the
plaintiffs in this case) sued the City in 2016 (in a
different case), challenging a pipeline permit fee
the City required the Water Department to pay to
the City's general fund to install and operate
pipelines and other facilities in the City's streets
and rights-of-way. The City established the
pipeline permit fee by ordinance, without approval
by the City's voters. The Water Department's
pipeline permit fee payments that were placed in
the City's general fund were treated as unrestricted
revenue. The Water Department, with City
Council approval, fixed its water and sewer rates
at a level to recoup the amount of the pipeline
permit fees from its customers.
5 On November 8, 2017, the City and Lejins settled
the pipeline permit fee lawsuit. The City agreed to
stop collecting pipeline permit fees from the Water
Department. The settlement also allowed the
Water Department to make payments to the City's
general fund to cover street repair and public
safety costs associated with the Water
Department's activities. The City commissioned
studies of such costs during the pipeline permit fee
litigation and determined payments to the general
fund to cover such costs would be less than the
amount the pipeline permit fee had generated for
the general fund. The City reduced water and
sewer rates accordingly, and agreed to transfer $12
million from the City's general fund to the Water
Department over approximately four years. On
December 5, 2017, the City Council adopted an
ordinance reducing water and sewer rates in
accordance with the settlement.
IV. Measure M and the Surcharge Embedded
in the Rates the Water Department Charges Its
Customers
In early 2018, the City Council held public
meetings to consider amending its Charter to
address the loss of general fund *6 revenue
resulting from the settlement of the pipeline
permit fee lawsuit-the amount which exceeded the
Water Department's payments to the City's general
fund to cover street repair and public safety costs
associated with the Water Department's activities.
During a January 10, 2018 meeting of the City's
Charter Amendment Committee and the City
Council there was discussion regarding the long
history in the City of transferring revenues from
the City's utilities to the City's general fund to help support general City services, such as police, fire,
library, and parks.
6 The City devised Measure M, which would amend
article XIV, section 1407 of the Charter to
authorize the Water Department to transfer to the
3 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 17 City's general fund any funds from the Water
Revenue Fund and/or the Sewer Revenue Fund
that the Board determined "to be unnecessary to
meet" other obligations of the Water Department,
not to exceed 12 percent of the "annual gross
revenues of the water works and sewer system,
respectively." (Charter, art. XIV, § 1407(5).)
Measure M would permit the City to use the
proceeds from these transfers for "unrestricted
general revenue purposes," as the City Council
may direct "by budget adoption or other
appropriation." (Id. at § 1407(6)-(7).) Measure M
would also authorize, but not require, the Board to
fix, and the City Council to approve, "water and
sewer rates in an amount sufficient to recover the
cost" of any transfers to the general fund that the
Board may make. (Id. at § 1407(8).) As set forth
in the City's opening brief on appeal, the purpose
of the Measure M revenue transfers was "to
provide financial support for general city
services."
On March 7, 2018, the City Council adopted a
resolution calling for the submission of the
proposed Charter amendment to *7 City voters at
the next general election. The Official Sample
Ballot for the general election at which Measure
M was approved asked voters the following: "To
maintain general City services like 9-1-1
emergency response, police/fire protection,
street/pothole repairs, senior services, parks and
libraries, shall the City of Long Beach amend its
Charter to authorize annual fund transfers from the
City's water, sewer and gas utilities to the General
Fund not to exceed 12% of utility gross revenues,
generating approximately $25, 500, 000 annually
for unrestricted general revenue purposes,
requiring annual independent audits, until ended
by voters?" An "Impartial Analysis of Measure
M" prepared by the city attorney described the
revenue to be transferred from the utilities to the
general fund under Measure M as "surplus"
revenue that is "not necessary to pay for a utility's
capital improvements, bond/debt service,
operations and maintenance, personnel, reserves,
and other costs." At the June 5, 2018 general
election, 53.76 percent of City voters approved
Measure M.
7 On June 21, 2018, the Board passed a resolution
fixing water and sewer rates effective October 1,
2018, raising rates for potable and recycled water
by 7.2 percent, and leaving sewer rates unchanged.
In a Notice of Public Hearing for an August 30,
2018 hearing, the Water Department informed
customers the proposed increase in water rates
was due to the following: "In June 2018, voters in
the city of Long Beach passed Measure M,
reauthorizing and affirming the City's historical
practice of revenue transfers from the City's
utilities to the General Fund, as approved by the
City Council and Board of Water Commissioners.
The revenue transfer is subject to a cap of twelve
percent (12%) of each utility's annual gross
revenues, as shown by audited *8 financial
reports. All proceeds from utility revenue transfers
to the General Fund shall be used to maintain local
General Fund services, which include general City
services such as police, fire and paramedic
response, street repair, parks, libraries and
youth/senior programs." On September 6, 2018,
the City Council passed Ordinance No. ORD-18-
0022, approving the rates fixed in the Board's June
21 resolution, including the potable and recycled
water rates that were increased by 7.2 percent to
fund the transfers to the City's general fund
authorized by Measure M.
8 The Measure M surcharge, which the City
characterizes as a general tax, is embedded in the
Water Department customers' utility service
charges and is not separately identified in the
Water Department's bills to customers. Thus, it is
not possible to discern from looking at the bills
what percentage of the customers' utility charges
make up the Measure M surcharge.
As the City explains in its opening brief on appeal,
the Measure M surcharge is "the part of the [water
and sewer] rates that raises unrestricted revenue
for the support of the City's general fund," not the
4 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 18 part of the rates that is "designed to recoup the
Water Department's costs of providing water and
sewer service." The City characterizes the
surcharge as a tax because it "exceeds the Water
Department's costs of providing water and sewer
service," as the City explains in its opening brief.
V. The Present Action
On October 22, 2018, Plaintiffs filed in this action
a verified petition for writ of mandate and
complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief,
asserting the Measure M surcharge violates article
XIII D, section 6, subdivision (b) because the rate
revenue collected through the surcharge "does not
benefit the water or sewer utility, is not used for
the provision of water and sewer *9 service, and is
not a reimbursement of costs incurred in the
General Fund for the benefit of the water and
sewer utilities. Instead, such rate revenue is used
for general governmental purposes." Plaintiffs
further asserted, to the extent the City contends the
Measure M surcharge is a general tax, article XIII
D, section 3, subdivision (a) "precludes local
governments from imposing general taxes upon
any parcel [of property] or upon any person as an
incident of property ownership."
9 By their first cause of action, Plaintiffs sought a
writ of mandate directing the City (1) to invalidate
the September 6, 2018 ordinance (Ordinance No.
ORD-18-002) approving utility rates that include
the Measure M surcharge; (2) to cease transferring
proceeds from the surcharge to the City's general
fund; (3) to return to the Water Department any
proceeds already so transferred; and (4) to cease
embedding the surcharge in water and sewer fees
and charges. In their second cause of action for
declaratory relief, Plaintiffs sought a judgment
declaring the City violated article XIII D, section
3, subdivision (a), and section 6, subdivision (b),
paragraphs (1)-(2) and (5), by imposing the
Measure M surcharge. In their third cause of
action for an injunction pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure section 526a, Plaintiffs sought a
permanent injunction precluding Measure M
transfers of funds from the Water Department and
ordering the return to the Water Department of
previously-transferred funds. Finally, Plaintiffs
sought an award of attorney fees and costs.
After the City filed an answer to the petition for
writ of mandate and complaint, Plaintiffs filed a
motion asking the trial court to issue the requested
writ of mandate, declaration, and permanent
injunction. In their opening brief on the petition
for writ of mandate, Plaintiffs argued the Measure
M surcharge *10 violates article XIII D, section 3,
subdivision (a), and section 6, subdivision (b),
paragraphs (1)-(2) and (5), for the reasons asserted
in their petition, as summarized above.
10 3
3 Plaintiffs also argued the Measure M
surcharge violates article XI, section 7 to
the extent the City collects the surcharge
from water and sewer utility customers
who receive service at a location outside
the City. As stated above, we need not
reach this issue because we conclude the
surcharge is unconstitutional and invalid as
to all customers under article XIII D, for
the reasons set forth below.
In opposition to the petition for writ of mandate,
the City argued article XIII D is inapplicable to a
general tax imposed on the use of a propertyrelated service (water and sewer) after approval by a majority of the City's voters pursuant to article
XIII C. The City also conceded that to the extent a
court concludes the Measure M surcharge is a fee
or charge subject to article XIII D, the surcharge
does not comply with article XIII D's
requirements. The City's opposition brief below
states: "[T]he City concedes that the general fund
surcharges do not comply with article XIIID [sic],
section 6(b)'s substantive requirements; after all,
proceeds from the surcharges are not used to fund
the City's water and sewer services, and instead
are intended for 'general revenue purposes.' "
On January 2, 2020, the trial court held a hearing
on Plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate and
causes of action for declaratory and injunctive
5 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 19 relief. After hearing argument by the parties, the
court adopted its 24-page tentative ruling as its
final decision, with oral modifications as set forth
in the reporter's transcript of the hearing. The
court concluded the Measure M surcharge violates
article XIII D, section 6, subdivision (b) *11
because it "is a general tax imposed as an incident
of property ownership and not a charge based on
actual water usage. The surcharge is not required
to provide the water and sewer service [(art. XIII
D, § 6, subd. (b), ¶ (1))], is not used for that
service [(art. XIII D, § 6, subd. (b), ¶ (2))], and
only benefits the general community [(art. XIII D,
§ 6, subd. (b), ¶ (5))]." The court also concluded
the Measure M surcharge violates article XIII D,
section 3, subdivision (a) "because it is a charge as
an incident of property ownership that does not
fall under any of the enumerated exceptions" for a
permissible fee or charge. The court explained
article XIII D, section 3, subdivision (a) "ensures
that the only levies that can be imposed on
property ownership per se are an ad valorem tax, a
special tax, an assessment, or some other levy that
complies with the substantive requirements" of
article XIII D, section 6, subdivision (b), and the
Measure M surcharge does not fit within any of
these categories. (Italics omitted.) The court
rejected the City's contention that obtaining voter
approval of Measure M pursuant to article XIII C
rendered XIII D inapplicable to the surcharge,
stating in its decision, "The answer is that [article
XIII C] does not relieve the City from complying
with [article XIII D], which carries independent
constitutional requirements." Finally, the court
concluded the City's imposition of a general tax
(the Measure M surcharge) upon customers who
receive water and sewer services at locations
outside the City's boundaries violates article XI,
section 7.
11 On February 7, 2020, the trial court entered
judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against the
City, providing (1) the Measure M general tax is
unconstitutional and invalid under article XIII D;
(2) the Measure M general tax is unconstitutional
and invalid under article XI, section 7, to the
extent the City collects the *12 surcharge from
water and sewer utility customers who receive
service at a location outside the City; (3) "any
transfers of the proceeds of the Measure M general
tax from the City's Water Revenue Fund and
Sewer Revenue Fund to its General Fund are
unconstitutional and invalid" under article XIII D;
and (4) "all City ordinances that establish and/or
fix water or sewer rates, including, but not limited
to, Ordinance No. 18-0022 and Ordinance No. 19-
0018 [the then-current water and sewer rate
ordinance, which became effective October 1,
2019], are unconstitutional and invalid to the
extent that they embed or otherwise impose the
Measure M general tax on the City's water and
sewer utility customers." The judgment enjoined
the City from making any further transfers of
Measure M proceeds to its general fund. The
judgment also ordered the issuance of a
peremptory writ of mandate. On February 11,
2020, the clerk of the trial court issued a
peremptory writ of mandate to the City,
commanding it to set aside or rescind Ordinance
No. ORD-19-0018 and return all prior transfers of
Measure M proceeds from the City's general fund
to the Water Revenue Fund and Sewer Revenue
Fund.
12 The City appealed from the judgment. Pursuant to
stipulation by the parties, the trial court stayed
enforcement of the peremptory writ of mandate
and the injunction, subject to certain enumerated
conditions, pending resolution of this appeal.
The parties stipulated to an award of attorney fees
to Plaintiffs. On May 27, 2020, the trial court
entered an order awarding attorney fees based on
the stipulation. The City appealed from the order,
seeking reversal of the attorney fees award to the
extent this court reverses the judgment in favor of
13 Plaintiffs on the merits. *13
Amicus curiae League of California Cities (Cal
Cities) filed in this appeal a brief in support of the
City, and Plaintiffs filed an answer to the amicus
6 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 20 curiae brief. Cal Cities describes itself as "an
association of 476 California cities dedicated to
protecting and restoring local control to provide
for the public health, safety, and welfare of their
residents and enhance the quality of life for all
Californians." We have considered this additional
briefing in analyzing the matter before us.
DISCUSSION
The City contends the trial court erred in
invalidating the Measure M surcharge, arguing "a
voter-approved general tax on the use of
municipal water and sewer service" is not a fee or
charge subject to article XIII D's restrictions. We
disagree with the City's interpretation of article
XIII D's scope and conclude the trial court
properly found in favor of Plaintiffs and against
the City.
I. Standard of Review
Whether the Measure M surcharge violates article
XIII D is a question of law that we review de novo
based on the undisputed facts. (Apartment Assn.,
supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 836; Tesoro Logistic
Operations, LLC v. City of Rialto (2019) 40
Cal.App.5th 798, 806 (Tesoro).)
In construing article XIII D, "The aim of
constitutional interpretation is to determine and
effectuate the intent of those who enacted the
constitutional provision at issue. [Citation.] To
determine that intent, we begin by examining the
constitutional text . . . ." (Richmond v. Shasta
Community Services Dist. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 409,
418 (Richmond).)" 'The principals of
constitutional interpretation are similar to those
governing statutory construction.' [Citation.] If the
language [of the *14 constitutional text] is clear
and unambiguous, the plain meaning governs.
[Citation.] But if the language is ambiguous, we
consider extrinsic evidence in determining voter
intent, including the Legislative Analyst's analysis
and ballot arguments for and against the
initiative." (Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Assn., Inc. v.
Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (2008)
44 Cal.4th 431, 444-445 (Silicon Valley).) We
conclude the language of article XIII D is clear
and unambiguous. In evaluating the issue before
us, however, we quote California Supreme Court
authority, which references extrinsic evidence,
such as the Proposition 218 Legislative Analyst's
analysis.
14 II. The Measure M Surcharge Violates Article
XIII D
A. Article XIII D, section 3 Article XIII D,
section 3 provides:
"Property Taxes, Assessments, Fees and Charges
Limited. (a) No tax, assessment, fee, or charge
shall be assessed by any agency upon any parcel
of property or upon any person as an incident of
property ownership except:
"(1) The ad valorem property tax imposed
pursuant to Article XIII and Article XIII A.
"(2) Any special tax receiving a two-thirds vote
pursuant to Section 4 of Article XIII A.
"(3) Assessments as provided by this article.
"(4) Fees or charges for property related services
as provided in this article.
"(b) For purposes of this article, fees for the
provision of electrical or gas service shall not be
deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident of
property ownership."
The word "agency," as used in article XIII D
"means any local government," including a charter
city. (Art. XIII D, § 2, *15 subd. (a); art. XIII C, §
1, subd. (b).) "Property ownership" is defined in
article XIII D "to include tenancies of real
property where tenants are directly liable to pay
the assessment, fee, or charge in question." (Id. at
§ 2, subd. (g).) A "property-related service" for
purposes of article XIII D, "means a public service
having a direct relationship to property
ownership." (Id. at § 2, subd. (h).)
15 4
5 7
Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 21 4 Cal Cities asserts in its amicus curiae brief
that "voter approval takes [a tax, like the
Measure M surcharge, ] outside article XIII
D, as such a tax is not imposed by an
'agency,' but by voters." Not so. As our
Supreme Court has explained, when an
agency places a measure on the ballot for
voter approval-as the City did here-it is the
agency, not voters, that assesses or imposes
the tax, assessment, fee, or charge within
the meaning of article XIII D. (California
Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland
(2017) 3 Cal.5th 924, 940-941, 942 ["that a
local government's imposition of a general
tax 'will not take effect' absent subsequent
approval by the voters" does not mean it is
the voters, as opposed to the local
government, who impose the tax].)
5 Thus, "article XIII D broadly defines
ownership to include rental interests."
(Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of
Fresno (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 914, 925,
fn. 3 (Fresno).)
B. Article XIII D, section 6
Article XIII D, section 6 provides, in pertinent
part:
"(b) Requirements for Existing, New or Increased
Fees and Charges. A fee or charge shall not be
extended, imposed, or increased by any agency
unless it meets all of the following requirements:
"(1) Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall
not exceed the funds required to provide the
16 property related service. *16
"(2) Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall
not be used for any purpose other than that for
which the fee or charge was imposed.
[¶] . . . [¶]
"(5) No fee or charge may be imposed for general
governmental services including, but not limited
to, police, fire, ambulance or library services,
where the service is available to the public at large
in substantially the same manner as it is to
property owners. . . . In any legal action contesting
the validity of a fee or charge, the burden shall be
on the agency to demonstrate compliance with this
article."
"Fee" or "charge," as used in article XIII D
"means any levy other than an ad valorem tax, a
special tax, or an assessment, imposed by an
agency upon a parcel or upon a person as an
incident of property ownership, including a user
fee or charge for a property related service." (Art.
XIII D, § 2, subd. (e).) As our Supreme Court has
explained, "Because article XIII D provides a
single definition that includes both 'fee' and
'charge,' those terms appear to be synonymous,"
and may be used interchangeably. (Bighorn-Desert
View Water Agency v. Verjil (2006) 39 Cal.4th 205,
214, fn. 4 (Bighorn).)
C. The City imposed the Measure M surcharge
as an incident of property ownership
As set forth above, article XIII D, section 3,
subdivision (a) prohibits an agency from assessing
a tax, fee, or charge "upon any parcel of property
or upon any person as an incident of property
ownership," with limited exceptions. Article XIII
D, section 6, subdivision (b) places restrictions on
an agency's imposition of a fee or charge "upon a
parcel or upon a person as an incident of property
ownership, including a user fee or charge *17 for a
property related service." (Art. XIII D, § 2, subd.
(e).) Whether the Measure M surcharge is imposed
upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of
property ownership is the key dispute between the
parties to be resolved in this appeal. The City has
acknowledged the Measure M surcharge does not
comply with article XIII D, section 6, subdivision
(b)'s requirements applicable to fees or charges
imposed upon a parcel or upon a person as an
incident of property ownership, as set forth more
fully below.
17 As our Supreme Court explained in Apartment
Assn., "article XIII D only restricts fees imposed
directly on property owners in their capacity as
such." (Apartment Assn., supra, 24 Cal.4th at p.
8 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 22 838.) "In other words, taxes, assessments, fees,
and charges are subject to the constitutional
strictures [of article XIII D] when they burden
landowners as landowners." (Id. at p. 842.) The
Supreme Court in Apartment Assn. concluded an
inspection fee imposed on private landlords by
city ordinance was not a fee upon a parcel or upon
a person as an incident of property ownership,
within the meaning of article XIII D, because the
fee was imposed on landlords "by virtue of their
ownership of a business-i.e., because they [were]
landlords," not because they were property
owners. (Apartment Assn., at p. 842.) The fee was
"imposed only on those landlords who [chose] to
engage in the residential rental business, and only
while they [were] operating the business." (Id. at
p. 840.) In other words, the fee was "imposed
because the property [was] being rented. It
cease[d] along with the business operation,
whether or not ownership remain[ed] in the same
hands." (Id. at p. 838; cf. Tesoro, supra, 40
Cal.App.5th 798, 801, 814 ["an 'annual business
license tax' of 'up to One Dollar [($1.00)] per year
for each One (1) cubic foot of *18 liquid storage
capacity' on '[a]ny person engaged in the business
of owning[, ] operating, leasing, supplying[, ] or
providing a wholesale liquid fuel storage facility'
in the City" violated article XIII D, section 3
because it was "a tax on real property and on
persons, namely, owners of wholesale liquid fuel
storage facilities, as an incident of owning the
facilities," "regardless of whether the facilities or
the storage tanks [were] used in any business
operations," and no exception set forth in section 3
applied].)
18 The City characterizes the Measure M surcharge
as a valid "utility users tax, or an excise tax levied
on the use of utility services-including water and
sewer service." The City argues the surcharge is
not imposed upon a parcel or upon a person as an
incident of property ownership, within the
meaning of article XIII D, because one may own
real property without obtaining water or sewer
service. Case law does not support the City's view.
In Richmond, supra, 32 Cal.4th 409, our Supreme
Court held "a charge that a local water district
imposed as a condition of making a new
connection to the water system, and that the
district used to finance capital improvements to
the water system," was not subject to article XIII
D's restrictions, as the district did not "impose the
capacity charge on real property as such, but on
individuals who apply for new service
connections." (Richmond, at pp. 415, 420.) The
Court "conclude[d] that a water service fee is a fee
or charge under article XIII D if, but only if, it is
imposed 'upon a person as an incident of property
ownership.' (Art. XIII D, § 2, subd. (e).) A fee for
ongoing water service through an existing
connection is imposed 'as an incident of property
ownership' because it requires nothing other than
*19 normal ownership and use of property. But a
fee for making a new connection to the system is
not imposed 'as an incident of property ownership'
because it results from the owner's voluntary
decision to apply for the connection." (Richmond,
at p. 427.)
19 The Court in Richmond explained that the
Proposition 218 "Legislative Analyst apparently
concluded that water service has a direct
relationship to property ownership, and thus is a
property-related service within the meaning of
article XIII D because water is indispensable to
most uses of real property; because water is
provided through pipes that are physically
connected to the property; and because a water
provider may, by recording a certificate, obtain a
lien on the property for the amount of any
delinquent service charges [citation]. But the
Legislative Analyst was apparently referring to
fees imposed on existing water service customers,
not fees imposed as a condition of initiating water
service in the first instance.
"Several provisions of article XIII D tend to
confirm the Legislative Analyst's conclusion that
charges for utility services such as electricity and
water should be understood as charges imposed 'as
an incident of property ownership.' For example,
9 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 23 subdivision (b) of section 3 provides that 'fees for the provision of electrical or gas service shall not
be deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident
of property ownership' under article XIII D. Under
the rule of construction that the expression of
some things in a statute implies the exclusion of
other things not expressed [citation], the
expression that electrical and gas service charges
are not within the category of property-related fees
implies that similar charges for other utility
services, such as water and sewer, are propertyrelated fees subject to the *20 restrictions of article XIII D." (Richmond, supra, 32 Cal.4th at pp. 426-
427.)
20 In Bighorn, supra, 39 Cal.4th 205, a case in which
our Supreme Court held article XIII C, section 3
"grants local voters a right to use the initiative
power to reduce the rate that a public water district
charges for domestic water," the Court cited with
approval the above-quoted principles from its
opinion in Richmond. (Bighorn, at pp. 209, 214-
215.) In analyzing the issue presented to it under
article XIII C, the Court in Bighorn reiterated its
conclusion in Richmond "that a public water
agency's charges for ongoing water delivery . . .
are fees and charges within the meaning of article
XIII D." (Bighorn, at p. 216.)
In Fresno, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th 914, the Fifth
District Court of Appeal relied on the Supreme
Court's analysis in Richmond in concluding a fee"
'in lieu of property and other taxes normally
placed upon private business, '" imposed "by
Fresno on its utility departments and divisions,
and passed through to ratepayers [by blending it
into the user fees], [was] a fee subject to the
restrictions of article XIII D, section 6" because it
was imposed as an incident of property ownership.
(Fresno, at pp. 917, 918, 925, 926.) The appellate
court rejected Fresno's argument-identical to the
City's argument here-that the fee was" 'imposed on
the use of utility services, '" rather than" 'solely on the basis of property ownership.' " (Id. at p. 925;
see *21 also Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v.
City of Roseville (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 637, 647
[Third District Court of Appeal held article XIII D
applied to in lieu franchise fee of four percent on
water, sewer, and refuse collection utilities' annual
budgets, paid by ratepayers and transferred to
Roseville's general fund, as the fee was
"necessarily tied to property ownership"]; Crawley
v. Alameda County Waste Management Authority
(2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 396, 408 ["Ordinance's
fee for the collection of household hazardous
waste is imposed 'as an incident of property
ownership'" because it is imposed on each
household in the county and" 'vacant [h]ouseholds
also require household hazardous waste collection
and disposal in connection with property
improvements, maintenance, or landscaping.'
Thus, the fee requires nothing other than normal
ownership and use of property"].)
6 21
6 The City attempts to distinguish Fresno
based on differences between Fresno's
charter and the City's charter, for example,
the fact Fresno's charter expressly
prohibited Fresno from taxing any person
for using a utility service. (Fresno, supra,
127 Cal.App.4th at p. 926.) The facts the
City cites are not germane to our analysis
of whether the Measure M surcharge is
imposed upon a parcel or upon a person as
an incident of property ownership, and
violates article XIII D, and we need not
address such facts further.
Following our Supreme Court's guidance, we
conclude the City imposed the Measure M
surcharge upon a parcel or upon a person as an
incident of property ownership, within the
meaning of article XIII D. "A fee for ongoing
water service through an existing connection is
imposed 'as an incident of property ownership'
because it requires nothing other than normal
ownership and use of property." (Richmond,
supra, 32 Cal.4th at p. 427.) Because the Measure
M surcharge therefore qualifies as a "levy other
than an ad valorem tax, a special tax, or an
assessment, imposed by an agency upon a parcel
or upon a person as an incident of property
22 ownership, including a user fee *22 or charge for a
10 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 24 property related service," it satisfies the definition of "fee" or "charge" in article XIII D. (Art. XIII D,
§ 2, subd. (e).)
D. The Measure M surcharge must comply
with article XIII D, section 6, subdivision (b)'s
requirements regardless of voter approval
As set forth above, and as relevant to the parties'
dispute here, article XIII D, section 6, subdivision
(b) requires that "[r]evenues derived from the fee
or charge shall not exceed the funds required to
provide the property related service"; "[r]evenues
derived from the fee or charge shall not be used
for any purpose other than that for which the fee
or charge was imposed"; and "[n]o fee or charge
may be imposed for general governmental
services, including but not limited to, police, fire,
ambulance or library services, where the service is
available to the public at large in substantially the
same manner as it is to property owners." (Art.
XIII D, § 6, subd. (b), ¶¶ (1), (2) & (5).)
The City argues article XIII D, section 6,
subdivision (b)'s restrictions on fees and charges
are inapplicable to the surcharge at issue here
because Measure M was approved by a majority
of the City's voters pursuant to article XIII C,
which requires voter approval of taxes imposed by
local governments. There is no language in article
XIII C or article XIII D that supports the City's
argument. Article XIII D makes clear that
regardless of whether the imposition is
characterized as a tax, assessment, fee, or charge,
if it is imposed upon a parcel of property or upon a
person as an incident of property ownership-as we
have concluded the Measure M surcharge is-it
must satisfy one of the exceptions to the
prohibition on an agency's imposition of a tax,
assessment, fee, or charge upon a parcel of
property or upon a person as an incident of
property ownership, enumerated in *23 article XIII
D, section 3. The only exception relevant here is a
fee or charge for a property-related service that
complies with the requirements of article XIII D,
section 6, subdivision (b). (Art. XIII D, § 3, subd.
(a), ¶ (4).) There is no exception for a voterapproved tax, assessment, fee, or charge imposed upon a parcel of property or upon a person as an
incident of property ownership that does not
satisfy one of the four enumerated exceptions in
article XIII D, section 3, subdivision (a). Indeed,
article XIII D, section 6, subdivision (c) has its
own voter approval requirements for certain
property-related fees and charges (not applicable
here), which do not obviate subdivision (b)'s
requirements for a valid property-related fee or
charge. (Art. XIII D, § 6, subd. (c) ["Voter
Approval for New or Increased Fees and Charges.
Except for fees or charges for sewer, water, and
refuse collection services, no property related fee
or charge shall be imposed or increased unless and
until that fee or charge is submitted and approved
by a majority of the property owners of the
property subject to the fee or charge or, at the
option of the agency, by a two-thirds vote of the
electorate residing in the affected area"].)
23 7
7 The other exceptions to the prohibition on
an agency's imposition of a tax,
assessment, fee, or charge upon a parcel of
property or upon a person as an incident of
property ownership are for an ad valorem
property tax, a special tax receiving a twothirds vote, and an assessment. (Art. XIII D, § 3, subd. (a), ¶¶ (1)-(3).) The City does
not dispute that none of these other
exceptions applies here.
Thus, voter approval of Measure M pursuant to
article XIII C does not rescue the City from an
independent constitutional violation of article XIII
D. (See Silicon Valley, supra, 44 Cal.4th at p. 449
["voter consent cannot convert an unconstitutional
*24 legislative assessment into a constitutional
one"].) The cases the City cites in support of its
position are inapposite.
24 For example, in Capistrano Taxpayers Assn. v.
City of San Juan Capistrano (2015) 235
Cal.App.4th 1493 (Capistrano), the Fourth
District Court of Appeal held Proposition 218
allows "public water agencies to pass on to their
11 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 25 customers the capital costs of improvements to
provide additional increments of water," but
Proposition 218 also "requires public water
agencies to calculate the actual costs of providing
water at various levels of usage" under article XIII
D, section 6, subdivision (b), paragraph (3)-a
provision not pertinent to the parties' dispute here.
(Capistrano, at p. 1497.) The City relies on
Capistrano for the following dicta set forth in the
conclusion of the appellate court's opinion:
"The way Proposition 218 operates, water rates
that exceed the cost of service operate as a tax,
similar to the way a 'carbon tax' might be imposed
on use of energy. But, we should emphasize: Just
because such above-cost rates are a tax does not
mean they cannot be imposed-they just have to be
submitted to the relevant electorate and approved
by the people in a vote. There is no reason, for
example, why a water district or local government
cannot, consistent with Proposition 218, seek the
approval of the voters to impose a tax on water
over a given level of usage-as we indicated earlier,
that might be a good idea. However, if a local
government body chooses to impose tiered rates
unilaterally without a vote, those tiers must be
based on cost of service for the incremental level
of usage, not predetermined budgets. (For the
moment, of course, we need not decide whether
such a proposed tax would constitute a general *25
tax or special tax.)" (Capistrano, supra, 235
Cal.App.4th at p. 1515.)
25 The court in Capistrano did not analyze the tax it
proposed to determine if it might qualify as a valid
special tax under article XIII D, section 3,
subdivision (a), and we have no cause to engage in
that undertaking. Suffice it to say, we conclude the
Measure M surcharge at issue here is a fee or
charge imposed upon a parcel of property or upon
a person as an incident of property ownership, that
was not approved by two-thirds of the City's
voters (and is not an ad valorem tax or an
assessment), and therefore must comply with
article XIII D, section 6, subdivision (b)'s
requirements in order to be valid. (Art. XIII D, §
3, subd. (a).)
The City also cites Redding, supra, 6 Cal.5th 1, a
case in which our Supreme Court concluded an
electric utility's transfer of utility funds to
Redding's general fund did not result in an
increase in rates customers paid, and the
customers' rates did not exceed the reasonable
costs of providing electric service, so voter
approval of the rates was not required pursuant to
article XIII C. (Redding, at pp. 4-5, 15.) In
analyzing the issue, the Supreme Court did not
interpret article XIII D. As set forth above, article
XIII D expressly states: "For purposes of this
article, fees for the provision of electrical or gas
service shall not be deemed charges or fees
imposed as an incident of property ownership."
(Art. XIII D, § 3, subd. (b).) Nonetheless, the City
cites the following language the Court used in
Redding in discussing article XIII C in relation to
the facts of that case: "[F]or any service charge to
which the article [art. XIII C] applies, a local
government must either charge a rate that does not
exceed the reasonable costs of providing the
service or obtain voter approval for rates that
exceed *26 costs." (Redding, at p. 18, italics
added.) This language has no applicability here, as
charges for water and sewer service-like those at
issue here-are not excluded from article XIII D's
definition of fee or charge.
26 E. The City has conceded the Measure M
surcharge is not a valid fee or charge under
article XIII D, as it does not comply with
subdivision (b)'s requirements
The City has acknowledged that to the extent
article XIII D applies to the Measure M surchargeas we concluded above- the surcharge is unconstitutional because it does not comply with
article XIII D, section 6, subdivision (b)'s
requirements. The City's opposition brief in the
trial court states: "[T]he City concedes that the
[Measure M] general fund surcharges do not
12 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 26 comply with article XIIID [sic], section 6(b)'s
substantive requirements; after all, proceeds from
the surcharges are not used to fund the City's
water and sewer services, and instead are intended
for 'general revenue purposes.'" Similarly, the
City's opening brief on appeal asserts: "Because
the proceeds of a general tax [referring to the
Measure M surcharge] are used for general
governmental purposes [citation], and the
proceeds of a 'fee' or 'charge' may only be used to
provide the service for which the 'fee' or 'charge' is
collected [citing art. XIII D, § 6, subd. (b), par.
(2)], general taxes can never satisfy the
substantive limitations applicable to 'fees' and
'charges.' "
The City made no attempt to prove the Measure M
surcharge complies with article XIII D, section 6,
subdivision (b)'s requirements, relying instead and
solely on its argument article XIII D does not
apply to a voter-approved general tax imposed on
the use of municipal water and sewer services, an
argument we *27 have rejected. For example, the
City did not attempt to demonstrate any
correlation between the Measure M transfers from
the Water Department to the City's general
fund/the Measure M surcharge, and the costs to
the City associated with the Water Department's
use of the City's infrastructure. (See art. XIII D, §
6, subd. (b), ¶ (1) ["Revenues derived from the fee
or charge shall not exceed the funds required to
provide the property related service"].) As the
record before us shows, and the City
acknowledges in its briefing, the purpose of
Measure M is to raise unrestricted revenue to
support a variety of municipal services (9-1-1
emergency response, police/fire protection,
street/pothole repairs, senior services, parks, and
libraries), not to reimburse the City for costs
associated with the Water Department's use of the
City's infrastructure.
27 In this regard, the matter before us is
distinguishable from Wyatt v. City of Sacramento
(2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 373, a recent Third District
Court of Appeal case on which the City relies in
support of its contention a city's voter-approved
general tax on utility services, to fund transfers to
the city's general fund, does not violate article XIII
D. In Wyatt, Sacramento argued-and the Court of
Appeal concluded Sacramento proved-a voterapproved mandatory 11 percent tax Sacramento imposed on utilities' revenues was a cost of
providing services that the utilities could pass on
to ratepayers without violating article XIII D,
section 6, subdivision (b). (Wyatt, at pp. 378, 380,
383.) We express no opinion on whether Wyatt
was correctly decided. We note only that Wyatt's
analysis is inapplicable to the case before us
because the City here never argued, and there is
nothing in the record indicating, the Measure M
transfers and/or surcharge were in *28 any way
related to the costs of providing water and sewer
services.
28 As it pertains to whether the City proved-or even
attempted to prove-the Measure M surcharge
complies with article XIII D, section 6,
subdivision (b)'s requirements, this case is more
similar to Fresno, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th 914,
where the Court of Appeal explained: "On the
current record . . . Fresno has not even claimed the
in lieu fee approximates the cost of city services to
the utility departments and divisions, much less
has it established such a relationship as a fact. (See
art. XIII D, § 6, subd. (b)(5) [allocating to
governmental agency burden to demonstrate
compliance with art. XIII D].) Accordingly, the
trial court correctly issued an injunction to
prohibit Fresno from collecting the current 1
percent in lieu fee from the water, wastewater, and
solid waste divisions of the department of public
utilities." (Fresno, at p. 927.)
Based on the City's concessions that the Measure
M surcharge does not comply with article XIII D,
section 6, subdivision (b)'s requirements, and the
absence of anything in the record before us
indicating such compliance, we need not address
this issue further. The Measure M surcharge is a
fee or charge within the meaning of article XIII D,
section 6, and the City has not carried its burden
13 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 27 of demonstrating compliance with subdivision
(b)'s requirements. (Art. XIII D, § 6, subd. (b), ¶
(5) ["In any legal action contesting the validity of
a fee or charge, the burden shall be on the agency
to demonstrate compliance with this article"].)
Thus, we hold the Measure M surcharge is
unconstitutional because it violates article XIII D.
The City and Cal Cities assert the invalidation of
the Measure M surcharge on these grounds will
mean the *29 invalidation of numerous taxes
imposed by local governments throughout
California. The only tax, fee, or charge before us
is the Measure M surcharge. We express no
opinion on the validity of taxes not before us.
29 Because we conclude the Measure M surcharge
violates article XIII D as to all Water Department
customers, for the reasons explained above, we
need not determine whether the trial court
correctly decided the surcharge also violates
article XI, section 7 to the extent the City collects
the surcharge from water and sewer utility
customers who receive service at a location
outside the City. And because we affirm the
judgment on the merits, we have no cause to
reverse the stipulated award of attorney fees to
Plaintiffs.
DISPOSITION
The judgment and post-judgment order awarding
attorney fees are affirmed. Respondents are
entitled to recover costs on appeal.
We concur: ROTHSCHILD, P. J., CRANDALL, J.
*30 Judge of the San Luis Obispo County
Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice
pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California
Constitution.
[*] 30[*]
14 Lejins v. City of Long Beach B305134 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2021) 28 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
22-0039
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM
BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 29
BCHD COVID-19 Health Update
January 25, 2022
30 View our data dashboard at www.bchd.org/covidnumbers State of COVID-19
31 State of COVID-19 in the Beach Cities
32 Vaccination Numbers in the Beach Cities
Data as of January 20, 2022
Percentage of
residents age 5+
Hermosa
Beach
Manhattan
Beach
Redondo
Beach
Los Angeles
County
Received 1+ dose 89% 92% 88% 81%
Fully vaccinated 81% 84% 81% 72%
Received 1+ additional
dose 45% 49% 44% 32%
33 Free At-Home COVID-19 Tests
Every home in the U.S. is eligible to order 4 free at-home COVID-19 tests Visit: covidtests.gov
Other Options
• Free COVID-19 Tests at the YMCA
• LA County Home Test Collection Program (limited availability) • LA County’s The Pick-Up Testing Kit
• BCHD COVID-19 Testing for School & City Employees
bchd.org/covidtesting
34 Protect Yourself & Others from COVID-19
Get Vaccinated &
Boosted
Upgrade Your Mask Wash Your Hands Stay Home & Test
When Sick
35 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
22-0049
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION PRESENTS AWARD TO
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 36
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
22-0040
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
POLICE CHIEF UPDATE
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 37
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
22-0050
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the written communication.
Attachments:
1. Letter from Matt McCool submitted January 18, 2022
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 38
From: Matt McCool <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 8:25 AM
To: 'Landon Phillips' <[email protected]>
Cc: 'Dorothy Scheid' <[email protected]>; 'Paul LeBaron' <[email protected]>; 'Suja Lowenthal' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Document Released to Requester] City of Hermosa Beach public records request #21-79 Lt. Phillips:
Thank you for confirming my observation that I was not provided a record of the watch commander log for my 3/15/14 attack.
“We no longer have a copy of the graveyard activity report for 3/16/14” is unacceptable. It creates the perception of impropriety, as this is too much of a coincidence.
I highly recommend you try harder to locate the activity report. I am sure there are redundant systems in place that include a hard copy and a digital copy for this exact reason.
Please do what you can by the next City Council meeting, where I will be addressing this issue.
If you are unable to locate the 3/16/14 activity log, I will be forced to make a public records request for all activity reports six months before and six months after 3/16/14 in order to count the other missing activity reports. With that data, I can calculate the statistical probability of you no longer having a copy of the 3/16/14 activity log.
Very respectfully,
Matt McCool
From: Landon Phillips <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 7:05 AM
To: Matt McCool <[email protected]>
Cc: Dorothy Scheid <[email protected]>; Paul LeBaron <[email protected]>; Suja Lowenthal <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Document Released to Requester] City of Hermosa Beach public records request #21-79 Good morning Mr. McCool,
As you know, the incident on 3/15/14 was documented in a crime report by Sgt. Ramirez.
At the time of the incident, the Watch Commander’s Daily Activity Report for the graveyard shift was evenly split between two dates and it was dated using the second half of the shift. For example, if the graveyard shift started on Friday, March 14, 2014 at 6pm and ended on Saturday, March 15, 2014 at 6am, the activity report would be dated as 3/15/14. The documents you received included the activity reports for:
3/15/14 Graveyard – Beginning on 3/14/14 at 6pm and ending on 3/15/14 at 6am 3/15/14 Dayshift – Beginning on 3/15/14 at 6am and ending on 3/15/14 at 6pm 3/16/14 Dayshift – Beginning on 3/16/14 at 6am and ending on 3/16/14 at 6pm 3/17/14 Graveyard – Beginning on 3/16/14 at 6pm and ending on 3/17/14 at 6am 39 3/17/14 Dayshift – Beginning on 3/17/14 at 6am and ending on 3/14/14 at 6pm The incident involving you was reported to Sgt. Ramirez on 3/15/14 at 6:24pm so it may have been included in the graveyard activity report dated 3/16/14. We no longer have a copy of the graveyard activity report for 3/16/14 so I cannot say if it was included in that report or not.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Landon Phillips |Lieutenant
City of Hermosa Beach
O: 310-318-0336
E: [email protected]
We exist so Hermosa Beach can be the safest little beach city through partnerships, integrity and excellent service.
From: Matt McCool <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 3:36 PM
To: Landon Phillips <[email protected]>
Cc: Dorothy Scheid <[email protected]>; Paul LeBaron <[email protected]>; Suja Lowenthal <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Document Released to Requester] City of Hermosa Beach public records request #21-79 Lt. Phillips:
I am respectfully requesting if you can confirm if my 3-15-14 attack was recorded on the watch commander log. I do not see it. However, my 3-16-14 follow up with Ofc. McDermott was recorded. See attached.
For your situational awareness, this case was part of a public hearing before the City Council in 2014.
At your convenience, please confirm if my 3-15-14 attack was logged or not.
Very respectfully,
Matt McCool
From: Starla Smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:48 PM
To: Matt McCool <[email protected]>
Cc: Landon Phillips <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Document Released to Requester] City of Hermosa Beach public records request #21-79 Good Evening Mr. McCool,
40 We have produced all the responsive records for your request, please contact my Lieutenant Landon Phillips if you have any questions regarding your request. I have cc'ed him on this email.
Starla Smith | Police Service Officer Supervisor
Hermosa Beach Police Department
540 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
o: 310-318-0344
e: [email protected]
hermosabeach.gov/police
We exist so Hermosa Beach can be the safest little beach city through partnerships, integrity, and excellent service.
From: Matt McCool <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:40 PM
To: Starla Smith <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Document Released to Requester] City of Hermosa Beach public records request #21-79 Ofc. Smith:
Thank you for the public records request. I want to follow up with you before I take this up the chain of command.
My attack on 3-15-14 is not on the watch commander log. On the attached page from 3-16- 14, Ofc. McDermott references “yesterday,” but I do not see anything logged by Sgt.
Ramirez.
At your convenience, please confirm if my 3-15-14 attack was logged or not.
Thank you in advance.
Very respectfully,
Matt McCool
From: City of Hermosa Beach Public Records <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 3:36 PM
41 To: [email protected]
Subject: [Document Released to Requester] City of Hermosa Beach public records request #21-79 -- Attach a non-image file and/or reply ABOVE THIS LINE with a message, and it will be sent to staff on this request. -- City of Hermosa Beach Public Records
A document has been released for
record request #21-79 along with the
following message:
Dear Mr. McCool:
This correspondence is in response to your Public Records Act request submitted to the City of Hermosa Beach (“City”) on December 27, 2021 and received by the City on the same
date. Your request seeks: the Hermosa Beach Police
Department Watch Commander Log for March 15-17 of 2014.
The City is hereby producing all responsive records to your request. A copy of these records is attached. Please note, however, that the PRA and case law interpreting it, exempts certain types of information from disclosure, including personal information that, if released, would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, such as the name of minors, medications taken, and the dates of birth pursuant to Gov. Code, § 6255. Information pertaining to person’s receipt of involuntary and voluntary medical services is also exempt from disclosure pursuant to Gov. Code, § 6254(k) & 42 Welfare & Institutions Code, § 5328. This information has accordingly been redacted where possible. In addition, the PRA only requires disclosure of records existing at the time of the request and not those that have been lawfully discarded (if any) prior to receipt of the request. (Cal. Gov. Code § 6254, subd. (c); Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1075.) Finally, we note that privilege logs are not required under the PRA and will not be provided by the City. (Haynie, supra, 26 Cal.4th at 1075.)
If you have any questions. Please feel free to contact our office.
Sincerely,
Starla Smith | Police Service Officer Supervisor
Hermosa Beach Police Department
540 Pier Ave. Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
o: 310-318-0344
e: [email protected]
hermosabeach.gov/police
• PRR 21-79.pdf
View Request 21-79
https://cityofhermosabeach-ca.nextrequest.com/requests/21-79 43 Document links are valid for one month. After February 13, you will need to sign in to view the document(s).
POWERED BY NEXTREQUEST
The All in One Records Requests Platform
Questions about your request? Reply to this email or sign in to contact staff at City of Hermosa Beach.
Technical support: See our help page
44 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
23-0041
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES
AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 45
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0038
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
(Interim City Clerk Susan Morrow)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council approve the following minutes:
1. January 11, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting
Respectfully Submitted by: Susan Morrow, Interim City Clerk Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 46
Hermosa Beach Virtual Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Closed Session - 5:00 P.M.
Regular Session - 6:00 P.M.
Virtual Meeting via Zoom
City Council
Michael Detoy, Mayor
Ray Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem
Stacey Armato, Councilmember
Mary Campbell, Councilmember
Justin Massey, Councilmember
I. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council Regular Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met via a virtual meeting held pursuant to Executive Order AB 361 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom September 16, 2021 on the above date. The Closed Session Meeting was called to order by Mayor Detoy at 5:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
Absent: None
IV. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
The following person provided public comment:
1. Matt McCool
IV. RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION
47 The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:07 p.m. to the hear the following Closed Session items:
a. MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on December 14, 2021. b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Pending Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.
Name of Case: Lynn Webster v. City of Hermosa Beach
Case Number: 21STCV26516, Los Angeles Superior Court
c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Anticipated Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council on the advice of its legal counsel, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City.
Number of Cases: Threat of litigation from the County of Los Angeles pertaining to workers compensation claims.
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Closed Session) I. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council Regular Meeting of the City of Hermosa Beach met via a virtual meeting held pursuant to Executive Order AB 361 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom September 16, 2021 on the above date. The Regular Session meeting was called to order by Mayor Detoy at 6:01 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Detoy.
III. ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
Absent: None
IV. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Jenkins stated that the Closed Session meeting began at 5:07 p.m. and one person provided public comment for the Closed Session agenda. He stated that the conference with legal counsel: pending litigation was not heard and there were no 48 reportable actions were taken on the conference with legal counsel: anticipated litigation. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Closed Session Report) V. ANNOUNCEMENTS – UPCOMING CITY EVENT
Councilmember Massey announced the Los Angeles County hazardous waste collection event by on Valley Drive, adjacent to Clark Field, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. this Saturday.
Mayor Detoy thanked those who donated to the 29th Annual Beach Cities Toy Drive as it was another successful year with donations still trickling in after the holidays. He thanked the community for their generosity.
Mayor Detoy shared the sad news of the tragic death of L.A. County Firefighter Jonathan Flagler. He lost his life on January 6th after heroically battling a house fire in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The City of Hermosa Beach joins with the Los Angeles County Fire Department and County Board of Supervisors in sending our deepest sympathies to his family, friends, and fellow firefighters – especially those who served alongside him at Fire Station 83 in Rancho Palos Verdes. His bravery will not be forgotten, and we keep his wife and two children in our thoughts and prayers.
Mayor Detoy concluded his announcement by mentioning that he will be holding neighbor walks and city talks as Mayor. He stated that more details will be forthcoming, and his first event will be on January 29th.
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Announcements Upcoming City Events)
VI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to approve the agenda except for removing Agenda Item l, second reading of Ordinance 22-1440 off the Consent Calendar, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried unanimously.
AYES: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
NOES: None
49 (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Approval of the Agenda) VII. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
a. COVID-19 HEALTH UPDATE FROM BEACH CITIES HEALTH DISTRICT AND
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE
b. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE WINNER OF THE 12TH ANNUAL PARKING
PERMIT ART CONTEST
c. HERMOSA BEACH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESENTS REVIEW OF 2021 PROGRAMS AND VISION FOR 2022
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s Office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Proclamations and Presentations)
VIII. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Lowenthal began her report by announcing that the City was seeking civicminded residents and business owners who are interested in serving on Hermosa Beach’s Cannabis Advisory Group. Members of the Cannabis Advisory Group should be available to participate in at least four or five public meetings of at least two to three hours in length. The meetings will be conducted by teleconference and will include testimony from the public. This group will provide input to the City Council on whether Hermosa Beach should modify its ordinance that bans cannabis sales in the city limits. She encouraged those interested to submit their Statement of Interest to [email protected] by Thursday, January 13th.
Ms. Lowenthal mentioned that staff continues to work and the City has extended the City’s limitations on direct, in-person services until at least Tuesday, January 18th. Outdoor areas including parks, playgrounds, restrooms, and sports courts will also remain open.
Ms. Lowenthal stated that the City was nearing completion of its CalTrans-funded Climate Adaptation Planning project. This project will develop concepts for capital projects that can address both mobility improvements and adaptations to potential sea-level rise. A final community meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 12th at 5 p.m. via Zoom and more information can be found on the City’s website and calendar.
City Manager Lowenthal announced that Los Angeles County will host its annual hazardous waste collection event on Valley Drive, adjacent to Clark Field, from 9 a.m. to 50 3 p.m. on January 15th. This event is an excellent opportunity for all Los Angeles County residents to safely dispose of their household hazardous waste and a complete list of eligible items and contact information is available on the City’s website and CleanLA.com.
Ms. Lowenthal stated that the implementation of the state-mandated organic waste recycling program has been delayed due to supply shortages on the delivery of the organic waste carts. She added that all other aspects of the mandatory organics program, including food donation tracking and city procurement, were moving forward on schedule.
Ms. Lowenthal mentioned that the Skechers Project will begin the construction of a walkway underneath 30th Street to connect their 2901 Pacific Coast Highway and 3001 Pacific Coast Highway buildings. Construction will last 9 months, and traffic will be restricted to one-lane eastbound with flagmen directing traffic. The City will be sharing the same update by email, social media, and online.
City Manager Lowenthal concluded her report by stating that the Planning Commission has rescheduled its public hearing regarding Starbucks’ application for a drive-through at its location on 2nd Street and Pacific Coast Highway. The new meeting will take place on February 15, and the City will issue a new public notice and directly notify community members who have reached out to the City regarding this matter.
Chief LeBaron provided his update.
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 City Manager Report) IX. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS/ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS The following people provided public comment:
1. Tony Higgins
2. Kent Allen
3. Trent Larson
4. Sarah Harper
5. Nancy Schwappach
6. Matt McCool
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Public Communication/Oral Written Communications)
51 X. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND
STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES
Mayor Detoy stated that he and Councilmember Campbell, attended the Economic Development Committee meeting on January 3rd. He reported that the Economic Development Plan was moving forward, and action items were being divided into five categories for implementation. Councilmember Campbell encouraged the community to review the meetings and provide their input as they finalize the Plan.
Mayor Detoy asked staff to provide an update on the CEQA analysis for the Outdoor Permit Program, which City Manager Lowenthal stated that the CEQA consultant was recently hired.
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 City Council Comments) XI. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Councilmember Massey moved to approve the Consent Calendar except for Agenda Item l, second reading of Ordinance 22-1440, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried unanimously.
AYES: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, Mayor Pro Tem Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
NOES: None
a. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
b. CHECK REGISTERS
c. REVENUE REPORT, COVID-19 REVENUE TRACKING REPORT,
EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 2021
d. CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT
e. CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN CHECKS
52 f. ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 2021 g. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE AND AMBULANCE MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 2021
h. ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2021
i. ACTION MINUTES OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 2022
j. AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CIP 629 THE
ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE
MUNICIPAL PIER
k. FINDINGS TO HOLD REMOTE TELECONFERENCE/MEETINGS, PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
m. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS AND THE BEACH CITIES REGARDING USE OF SBCCOG’S
ALLOCATED COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES INNOVATION GRANT FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT THE CITIES’ CASE MANAGEMENT PROJECT
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Consent Calendar) XII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE
DISCUSSION
l. ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 16, ADDING CHAPTER 16.24 URBAN LOT SPLITS AND SECTIONS 16.24.10 THROUGH 16.24.70 AND ALSO AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.08 R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONE TO INCLUDE TWO-UNIT PROJECTS AS PERMITTED USES IN SECTION 17.08.020 AND ADD A NEW SECTION 17.08.050 TWO-UNIT
PROJECTS PERMITTING THEM SUBJECT TO OBJECTIVE STANDARDS IN 53 THE R-1 ZONE AS ALLOWED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 9 The following people provided public comment:
1. Dean Francois
2. Trent Larson
3. Jon Davis
MOTION: Councilmember Massey moved to waive full second reading and adopt by title Ordinance 22-1444; and direct staff to publish a summary ordinance, seconded by Councilmember Armato. Motion carried by majority consent.
AYES: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, and Mayor Detoy NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Jackson
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Items removed from Consent Calendar)
XIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL 2022 IMPACT LEVEL III EVENTS INCLUDING:
BATTLE AT THE BEACH-SUPER BOWL TOURNAMENT (2/06); BEACH TENNIS TOURNAMENTS (3/05-3/06, 4/09, 6/04-6/05, 8/27, 9/17-9/18; 10/15- 10/16; AND 10/29-10/30); CONCERT AT CLARK FIELD (5/14); AND TRIATHLON (6/10-6/12)
The following people provided public testimony:
1. Trent Larson
2. Mark Mamber
3. Dency Nelson
MOTION: Councilmember Campbell moved to approve the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission’s recommendation to include the following additional Impact Level III Special Events on the 2022 Special Event 54 Calendar:
Battle on the Beach-Super Bowl Tournament on Sunday, February 6 south of the pier;
Beach Tennis Tournaments on Saturday, March 5-Sunday, March 6; Saturday, April 9; Saturday, June 4-Sunday, June 5; Saturday, August 27; Saturday, September 17-Sunday, September 18; Saturday, October 15- Sunday, October 16; and Saturday, October 29-Sunday, October 30 on the beach tennis courts;
Concert at Clark Field on Saturday, May 14 on Clark Field; and West Coast AAU Junior Olympic Games on Monday, July 25-Friday, July 29 on the volleyball courts north and south of the pier; and Triathlon on Friday, June 10-Sunday, June 12 on the strand north and south of the pier, Pier Plaza, and the volleyball courts north of the pier, seconded by Councilmember Massey. Motion carried unanimously.
AYES: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, and Mayor Pro Tem Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
NOES: None
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Public Hearing item a) b. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF APPROXIMATELY $62,938 OF FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR SIDEWALK RECONSTRUCTION ALONG
LONGFELLOW AVENUE AND MONTEREY BOULEVARD, AUTHORIZING USE
OF CDBG FUNDS FOR CONTRACTORS, AND GRANTING THE PUBLIC
WORKS DIRECTOR AUTHORITY TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF COMPLETION The following person provided public testimony:
1. Trent Larson
MOTION: Councilmember Armato over to:
1. Adopt the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 budget resolution which:
a. Approves the FY 2022-23 CDBG allocation of approximately $62,938; b. Approves the allocation of approximately $62,938 of Federal CDBG funds in FY 2022-23 for the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) sidewalk improvements project;
55 c. Authorizes the use of CDBG funds in FY 2022-23 for a construction contractor and a Contract/Labor Compliance Officer to provide direct project related services including but not limited to construction management and inspections; and
2. Grant the Public Works Director authority to submit a notice of completion once work is complete, seconded by Councilmember Massey. Motion carried unanimously.
AYES: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, and Mayor Pro Tem Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
NOES: None
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Public Hearing item b) XIV. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
a. AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC
INFORMATION OFFICER SERVICES TO LAURA MECOY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
The following people provided public comment:
1. Kent Allen
2. Trent Larsen
3. Matt McCool
4. Laura Pena
MOTION: Councilmember Armato moved to:
1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Laura Mecoy Communications, LLC, to provide Public Information Officer Services in the amount of $86,400 for one year, with the option to renew for four (4) additional one-year terms; and
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest the Professional Services Agreement, seconded by Councilmember Campbell. Motion carried unanimously.
AYES: Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Armato, and Mayor Pro Tem Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
56 NOES: None
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Municipal Matter item a) XV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
a. MAYOR PRO TEM JACKSON REQUESTS THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN ITEM FOR THE JANUARY 25, 2022 AGENDA THAT INCLUDES
A RECOMMENDATION FOR AN ENCROACHMENT FEE FOR THE TEMPORARY
OUTDOOR PERMIT PROGRAM FOR THE DINING DECKS
Mayor Pro Tem Jackson wanted to have City Council support to have an agenda item prepared on a recommendation for an encroachment fee for the Temporary Outdoor Permit Program for the dining decks. Councilmembers Massey, Campbell, Amato, and Mayor Detoy supported a full agenda item be brought back on January 25, 2022. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Future Agenda item a) b. TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council received and filed as there were no changes to the tentative agenda items. (Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Future Agenda item b) XVI. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Detoy adjourned the meeting at 9:42 p.m. Mayor Detoy announced the next City Council meeting will be on January 25, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. for Closed Session and 6:00 p.m. for the Regular Session.
(Complete audio and video are available upon request at the City Clerk’s office or can be accessed by clicking the following link: January 11, 2022 Meeting Adjournment).
Susan Morrow, Interim City Clerk
57 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0042
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
CHECK REGISTERS
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council ratify the following check registers.
Attachments:
1. Check Register 12/30/2021
2. Check Register 1/6/2022
Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 58
12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98745 12/30/2021 21688 A.J. KIRKWOOD & ASSOCIATES K210949 EMERG REPAIRS/CLARK FIELD TENNIS LIGHTS 105-2024 1,530.00
21688 Total : 1,530.00
98746 12/30/2021 11437 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CO OP 113006 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM - CARD/NOV 21 145-3404-4201 1,525.22
113021 TAXI VOUCHER PROGRAM - VOUCHERS/NOV 21
145-3404-4201 256.37
11437 Total : 1,781.59
98747 12/30/2021 00353 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO. 118633 COVER FOR MONUMENT 001-3104-4309 591.28
001-3104-4309 60.61
00353 Total : 651.89
98748 12/30/2021 20685 AMERICAN GUARD SERVICES, INC. INV35019 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES/ NOV 21 146-2102-4201 19,481.28
20685 Total : 19,481.28
98749 12/30/2021 11575 BANK OF NY MELLON TRUST CO NA, THE 252-2421195 INVESTMENT SAFEKEEPING/ JUL - SEP 21 001-1141-4201 875.00
11575 Total : 875.00
98750 12/30/2021 20942 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 921516 CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES-GENERAL/NOV 21 001-1131-4201 21,652.80
921517 ATTORNEY-PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS/NOV 21
001-1131-4201 6,658.00
921518 CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES-COVID/NOV 21
157-2702-4201 11,732.50
921519 CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES - ADA/ NOV 21
001-1203-4201 20.50
921520 CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES-LAND USE/ NOV 21
001-1131-4201 4,216.85
921521 CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES-FANGARY/ NOV 21
705-1133-4201 9,008.39
921522 LEGAL - HUMAN RESOURCES/ NOV 21
001-1203-4201 2,660.00
921523 LEGAL-PW CONSTRUCTION/ NOV 21
Attachment 159
12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98750 12/30/2021 20942 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP (Continued) 001-1131-4201 4,785.00
20942 Total : 60,734.04
98751 12/30/2021 00163 BRAUN LINEN SERVICE 1723000 to 1730086 PRISONER LAUNDRY/ NOV 21 001-2101-4306 451.35
00163 Total : 451.35
98752 12/30/2021 21720 CAPITAL WHOLESALE LIGHTING 447101, 447103 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ NOV 21 001-4204-4309 1,808.97
21720 Total : 1,808.97
98753 12/30/2021 09632 CDWG M079276 TONER - JAIL PRINTER 001-2101-4305 556.17
N349221 COMPUTER POWER ADAPTER - PD
001-2101-4305 56.03
09632 Total : 612.20
98754 12/30/2021 09694 CLEAN ENERGY CE12415921 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS/ JUL 21 715-3109-4310 32.38
CE12425057 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS/ AUG 21
715-3109-4310 25.42
CE12433755 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS/ SEP 21
715-6101-4310 40.19
CE12442654 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS/ OCT 21
715-3109-4310 40.94
09694 Total : 138.93
98755 12/30/2021 21871 COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH & 50102 LEGAL SERVICES/UUT LAWSUIT/ NOV 21 705-1133-4201 137.05
21871 Total : 137.05
98756 12/30/2021 20627 COMMERCIAL BUILDING MANAGEMENT 68534 JANITORIAL/COVID PORTER/ NOV 21 001-4204-4201 6,861.00
157-2702-4201 4,296.44
20627 Total : 11,157.44
98757 12/30/2021 12964 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AR0241676 BACKFLOW TESTING 001-6101-4251 74.00
AR0262944 BACKFLOW TESTING
60 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98757 12/30/2021 12964 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (Continued) 001-6101-4251 37.00
AR0262945 BACKFLOW TESTING
001-6101-4251 37.00
AR0262946 BACKFLOW TESTING
001-6101-4251 37.00
AR062943 BACKFLOW TESTING
001-6101-4251 37.00
12964 Total : 222.00
98758 12/30/2021 20781 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES C0010168 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES/ JAN 22 001-2202-4251 524,522.03
180-2202-4251 3,588.52
20781 Total : 528,110.55
98759 12/30/2021 22456 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, C/O AUDITOR CONTROLLER 900001 SART EXAM ACCT#1024840197 001-2101-4201 1,074.76
22456 Total : 1,074.76
98760 12/30/2021 19444 CROTTY, CRAIG R 12621 CRAIG CROTTY - ARBORIST SERVICES AT CLAR 301-8689-4201 2,500.00
19444 Total : 2,500.00
98761 12/30/2021 00364 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 542123 MAT REQ 973968/FINGERPRINTING/OCT 21 001-1203-4251 512.00
00364 Total : 512.00
98762 12/30/2021 11449 DEWEY PEST CONTROL 1233239 SEWER RAT ABATEMENT/OCT-DEC 21 160-3102-4201 834.00
11449 Total : 834.00
98763 12/30/2021 17868 DONNOE & ASSOCIATES, INC 9141 POLICE TESTS INV 9141 001-1203-4201 550.00
17868 Total : 550.00
98764 12/30/2021 20668 DUNCAN SOLUTIONS, INC. 1006303 CITATION PAYMENT SYSTEM FEES/ NOV 21 001-1204-4201 3,273.65
20668 Total : 3,273.65
98765 12/30/2021 06293 FEDEX OFFICE 7-571-51072 MAT REQ 973970/SHIPPING SERVICES 61 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98765 12/30/2021 06293 FEDEX OFFICE (Continued)
001-1203-4201 48.81
7-601-44834 MAT REQ 973970/SHIPPING SERVICES
001-1203-4201 83.78
06293 Total : 132.59
98766 12/30/2021 20842 FLORES, ANTHONY 80640 PO 37057 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT/FALL21 001-2101-4317 3,240.00
20842 Total : 3,240.00
98767 12/30/2021 01320 GALLS LLC BC1499824 MAT REQ 838555/FLASHLIGHT/CSO ALVARADO 001-3302-4314 124.15
01320 Total : 124.15
98768 12/30/2021 07547 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS AND ASSC SIN013241 SALES TAX AUDIT/OCT21-DEC21 001-1202-4201 1,352.09
07547 Total : 1,352.09
98769 12/30/2021 15141 HONDA MD INC, STEPHAN T 00132913 DETAINEE BLOOD DRAW/ NOV 21 001-2101-4201 63.60
15141 Total : 63.60
98770 12/30/2021 21849 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 74187 ON-CALL ENGINEERING SRVCS/OCT21 001-3104-4201 1,920.00
21849 Total : 1,920.00
98771 12/30/2021 22496 JONES, JOHN RILEY 0000001 EXECUTIVE COACHING SRVCS/OCT 21 001-1201-4201 800.00
0000002 EXECUTIVE COACHING SRVCS/NOV 21
001-1201-4201 900.00
22496 Total : 1,700.00
98772 12/30/2021 12978 KEALY CONSTRUCTION, PATRICK 52306/PW21-0771 STREET EXCAVATION PERMIT REFUND 001-3831 722.25
12978 Total : 722.25
98773 12/30/2021 00118 LA SUPERIOR COURT - TORRANCE PO 36976 CITATION SURCHARGES/NOV21 001-3302 40,611.50
00118 Total : 40,611.50
62 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98774 12/30/2021 22299 LAW OFFICE OF C PATRICK HAMBLI 4441 LEGAL SRVCS/PERSONNEL/SEPT21 001-1203-4201 486.75
4523 LEGAL SRVCS/PERSONNEL/OCT21
001-1203-4201 1,468.50
22299 Total : 1,955.25
98775 12/30/2021 22111 LEO WEB PROTECT INC 3456 PD SUBSCRIPTION/INTERNET PRIVACY 001-2101-4201 3,999.96
22111 Total : 3,999.96
98776 12/30/2021 19487 M6 CONSULTING INC 1907 PLAN CHECKS/NOV21 001-4202-4201 6,130.00
19487 Total : 6,130.00
98777 12/30/2021 18071 MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES 58970 CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING/NOV21 001-6101-4201 21,200.00
58971 CITYWIDE MEDIAN LANDSCAPING/NOV21
105-2601-4201 3,600.00
18071 Total : 24,800.00
98778 12/30/2021 22444 MV CHENG & ASSOCIATES INC 11/30/2021 TEMP ACCTS PAYABLE CLERK/NOV21 001-1201-4201 8,812.50
22444 Total : 8,812.50
98779 12/30/2021 14693 PARS 49086 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/AUG21 001-1101-4185 6.36
001-1204-4185 0.59
001-3302-4185 2.94
001-4204-4185 5.51
001-4101-4185 6.16
001-4201-4185 6.16
001-4601-4185 98.67
49233 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/SEPT21
001-1101-4185 6.51
001-1204-4185 0.61
001-3302-4185 3.01
001-4204-4185 5.64
001-4101-4185 6.30
001-4201-4185 6.30
63 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98779 12/30/2021 14693 PARS (Continued)
001-4601-4185 101.02
49454 ALT RETIREMENT PLAN ADMIN FEES/OCT21
001-1101-4185 6.48
001-1204-4185 0.60
001-3302-4185 3.00
001-4204-4185 5.62
001-4101-4185 6.27
001-4201-4185 6.27
001-4601-4185 100.58
14693 Total : 384.60
98780 12/30/2021 15701 POELSTRA, GERRITT "JOE" TR 896 PER DIEM/SHERMAN BLOC LEADRSHIP 001-2101-4312 150.00
15701 Total : 150.00
98781 12/30/2021 01911 PROVIDENCE MEDICAL GuarantorID600000284 MAT REQ 973969/EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS 001-1203-4305 309.00
GuarantorID600000285 MAT REQ 973969/EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS
001-1203-4305 473.00
01911 Total : 782.00
98782 12/30/2021 03282 REDONDO BEACH, CITY OF 574173 CITY PROSECUTOR SERVICES/NOV21 001-1132-4201 16,667.00
03282 Total : 16,667.00
98783 12/30/2021 21153 RJ PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL 800 PD EXCEPTION SLIPS 001-2101-4305 663.60
001-2101-4305 58.96
21153 Total : 722.56
98784 12/30/2021 03428 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC. 87393558 REQ 638996/HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL 001-3104-4201 1,091.00
03428 Total : 1,091.00
98785 12/30/2021 16425 SAFEWAY INC VONS 724516-111121-2110 REQ 987408/WATER/VETERANS DAY EVENT 001-4601-4308 16.17
804136-111021-2110 REQ 987407/WATER/VETERANS DAY EVENT
001-4601-4308 9.59
64 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98785 12/30/2021 16425 SAFEWAY INC VONS (Continued) Total : 25.76 98786 12/30/2021 08165 SASE COMPANY INC INV278576 PW GRINDER PARTS 001-3104-4309 388.64
001-3104-4309 36.93
INV280180 PW GRINDER PARTS/DRUMS
001-3104-4309 777.28
001-3104-4309 73.83
INV280194 PW GRINDER PARTS
001-3104-4309 145.51
001-3104-4309 13.82
08165 Total : 1,436.01
98787 12/30/2021 03353 SBCU VISA 0028 PO 37026 CC FIELD TRAINING OFCR/SMITH/JAN21 001-2101-4312 315.00
0650632 PO 36864 CC CELL PHONE CASE/J.DAVIS
001-4202-4305 44.96
001-4202-4305 4.27
0882643 PO 36806 CC PW ENGINEERS/COFFEE SUPPLIES
001-4202-4305 79.95
001-4202-4305 2.92
105707 TR868 CC FUEL PURCHASE/LEEDS INSTITUTE/LEBARON
001-2101-4317 22.00
124487479006 CC SENIOR CENTER MUSIC/NOV21
001-4601-4328 9.99
200000172 PO 36871CC CITY CLERK JOB POSTING
001-1203-4201 200.00
20541 PO 36888 CC TRAINING/SECONDS IN COMMAND/SCHEID
001-2101-4317 150.00
213759 PO 36916 CC CITY COUNCIL RETREAT/11-6-21
001-1101-4201 2,345.89
001-1101-4201 175.14
24 PO 36897 CC MAYOR TRANSITION RECEPTION/11-8-21
001-1101-4319 732.00
001-1101-4319 57.00
31 11/4/21 CC SOUTH BAY CHIEF LUNCHEON 11-4-21
001-2101-4305 175.10
3180 PO 36920 CC SNOWMAN EVENT SUPPLIES
001-4601-4308 134.10
65 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98787 12/30/2021 03353 SBCU VISA (Continued)
341099001201 TR868CC FUEL PURCHASE/LEEDS INSTITUTE
001-2101-4317 58.00
377302/PO 36696CC LED LIGHTS/PARTS
001-4601-4201 589.88
469266 PO36578 CC LEBARON/ADDT'L CELL PHONE STORGE/NOV21 001-2101-4305 2.99
47276 PO 37009 CC GAVEL PLAQUE/MAYOR MASSEY
001-1101-4319 80.00
001-1101-4319 6.38
478166 PO 36578 CC SCHEID/ADDT'L CELL PHONE STORAGE/NOV21 001-2101-4305 0.99
49960 PO36867 CC COFFEE/PASTRIES/PD RECRUIT ORAL BOARD
001-1203-4305 26.90
5 PO 37011 CC PW YARD TEAM MEETING/BREAKFAST
001-1201-4305 159.30
001-1201-4305 13.73
533355 TR 894 CC LEAGUE OF CITIES/CM CONFERENCE
001-1201-4317 725.00
533357 PO 37013 CC COUNCIL MEMBR ACADEMY/REGISTRATION
001-1101-4317 250.00
54962 TR868 CC TRANSPORTATION/UBER/LEBARON
001-2101-4317 2.50
554 PO 37031 CC PD CAR WASH/CHIEF
715-2101-4311 23.99
570387 MR 791238 CC COFFEE TRAVELER/PW/GALLEGOS GATHERING 001-4202-4305 59.85
65069 PO 37066 CC COMPUTER RAM/DESKTOP MEMORY
001-4201-4305 106.50
001-4101-4305 106.50
001-4201-4305 10.11
001-4101-4305 10.11
7276935859 PO37025CC BEREAVEMENT FLOWER PURCHASE/PD
001-2101-4305 112.53
73820 PO 36834 CC COMPUTER MEMORY/BRACKET/HARD DRIVE
001-1201-4305 214.96
001-1201-4305 20.41
8521023 PO 36833 CC PW ENGINEER/HEADPHONES/WEBCAM
001-4202-4305 161.07
66 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
9 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98787 12/30/2021 03353 SBCU VISA (Continued)
001-4202-4305 15.30
878857 PO 37012 CC MGMNT TEAM BUILDING WORKSHOP/LUNCH
001-1203-4317 249.00
001-1203-4317 19.71
9533062 TR 868CC FUEL PURCHASE/LEEDS INSTITUTE/LEBARON
001-2101-4317 58.00
EBUQUJ TR 893CC CA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOC/LEGISLATIV TOUR 001-1101-4317 575.00
PO 36872 CC COMM RESOURCES/RENEWAL DUES
001-4601-4315 555.00
PO 36886 CC FLIGHT/CPRS CONFERENCE/NICHOLS
001-4601-4317 443.88
PO 37072 CC MONTHLY DAILY BREEZE/NOV21
001-4101-4315 14.00
RU311890 PO36585CC EOC SATELLITE PHONE/10-28 TO 11-27-21 001-1201-4304 57.67
03353 Total : 9,177.58
98788 12/30/2021 17903 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 9304-6 MAT REQ 279167/PAINTING SUPPLIES 001-3301-4309 206.10
9684-1 MAT REQ 279169/PAINTING SUPPLIES
001-3104-4309 157.06
17903 Total : 363.16
98789 12/30/2021 00114 SMART & FINAL 3220630001001 MAT REQ 838904/PD BRIEFING SUPPLIES 001-2101-4305 107.52
3220630002802 MAT REQ 838906/JAIL SUPPLIES
001-2101-4306 188.28
3220630007902 MAT REQ 479091/PD FAREWELL EVENT
001-1201-4305 24.77
3220630008501 MAT REQ 437845/PD BASE OFFICE SUPPLY
001-3302-4305 95.59
3220630021801 MAT REQ 838900/JAIL SUPPLIES
001-2101-4306 14.99
00114 Total : 431.15
98790 12/30/2021 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM 04067 MAT REQ 583676/CELLULAR ANTENNAS 715-3302-4311 358.31
67 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
10 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98790 12/30/2021 08812 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL PUBLIC COMM (Continued) 04068 MAT REQ 583675/CELLULAR ANTENNAS
715-3302-4311 358.31
04069 MAT REQ 583674/CELLULAR ANTENNAS
715-3302-4311 441.00
04070 MAT REQ 583678/CELLULAR ANTENNA
715-3302-4311 358.31
04072 MAT REQ 583679/CELLULAR ANTENNAS
715-3302-4311 358.31
04073 MAT REQ 583681/ CELLULAR ANTENNA
715-3302-4311 358.31
04074 MAT REQ 583680/CELLULAR ANTENNAS
715-3302-4311 358.31
04075 MAT REQ 583677/ETHERNET ADAPTER
715-3302-4311 30.78
08812 Total : 2,621.64
98791 12/30/2021 00159 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO 700057262780 ELECTRICITY 11-4-21 TO 12-6-21 105-2601-4303 74.39
001-2026 0.69
001-2027 -0.69
700234897163 ELECTRICITY 11-4-21 TO 12-6-21
001-3304-4303 2,381.62
001-2026 32.96
001-2027 -32.96
700304673105 ELECTRICITY 11-4-21 TO 12-6-21
160-3102-4201 90.53
001-2026 0.53
001-2027 -0.53
700338055956 ELECTRICITY 11-5-21 TO 12-7-21
001-4204-4303 1,495.49
001-2026 31.41
001-2027 -31.41
700371314327 ELECTRICITY 11-8-21 TO 12-8-21
105-2601-4303 139.44
001-2026 1.46
001-2027 -1.46
00159 Total : 4,181.47
68 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
11 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98792 12/30/2021 19623 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 0011499124 CLASSIFIED/ADVERTISING/NOV21 001-1121-4323 553.12
19623 Total : 553.12
98793 12/30/2021 18821 SPCALA 2021-1130 ANIMAL SHELTERING/DISPOSAL/NOV21 001-3302-4201 875.00
18821 Total : 875.00
98794 12/30/2021 21075 THAYER'S DIST. & ELECTRICAL 7587 ELECTRICAL GATE REPAIR/CITY YARD 001-4204-4201 635.58
7628 ELECTRICAL GATE SRVC/REPAIR/BARD ST
001-4204-4201 682.50
21075 Total : 1,318.08
98795 12/30/2021 20121 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIO 79782 PD COUNSELING SRVCS/JUL21 001-1203-4201 500.00
80618 PD COUNSELING/OCT21
001-1203-4201 250.00
20121 Total : 750.00
98796 12/30/2021 00123 TRIANGLE HARDWARE 30607 thru 30621 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/DEC21 001-3104-4309 1,868.42
001-4204-4309 2,129.97
001-6101-4309 636.26
105-2601-4309 480.65
715-4206-4311 392.90
001-2021 115.29
001-2022 -115.29
00123 Total : 5,508.20
98797 12/30/2021 09718 WEBB, W. ROBERT PO 37014 TAXI VOUCHER REFUND/UNUSED 145-3853 27.00
09718 Total : 27.00
98798 12/30/2021 22297 WIRELESS CCTV LLC 83458 PD CCTV CAMERA TRAILER 150-2120-4201 31,192.62
22297 Total : 31,192.62
98799 12/30/2021 00315 YAMADA COMPANY INC. 81434 MAT REQ 583665/HONDA PARTS 715-3102-4311 81.53
69 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
12 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98799 12/30/2021 00315 YAMADA COMPANY INC. (Continued) Total : 81.53 3191081 10/22/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 74911615 VEHICLE FUEL/ 9-11 TO 10-10-21 715-4206-4310 67.91
715-6101-4310 428.53
001-1250 188.21
715-2101-4310 5,592.96
715-3104-4310 530.03
715-3302-4310 982.74
715-4204-4310 312.08
10668 Total : 8,102.46
3219023 12/2/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 75758176 VEHICLE FUEL/ 10-11 TO 11-10-21 715-2101-4310 5,854.16
715-3104-4310 601.28
715-3302-4310 1,301.64
715-4204-4310 684.56
715-4206-4310 171.44
715-6101-4310 524.35
10668 Total : 9,137.43
5358260 9/10/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 73394591 VEHICLE FUEL/ 7-11 TO 8-10-21 001-1250 91.60
715-2101-4310 5,803.14
715-3104-4310 529.83
715-3302-4310 1,418.17
715-4204-4310 596.73
715-4206-4310 153.52
715-6101-4310 328.04
10668 Total : 8,921.03
5715626 12/30/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 76666174 VEHICLE FUEL/ 11-11 TO 12-10-21 001-1250 98.44
715-2101-4310 4,775.73
715-3104-4310 162.35
715-3302-4310 1,048.95
715-4204-4310 620.36
715-4206-4310 71.86
715-6101-4310 421.81
70 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
13 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
5715626 12/30/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET (Continued) Total : 7,199.50 6021662 6/17/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 72288068 VEHICLE FUEL/ 5-11 TO 6-10-21 001-2024 89.02
715-2024 8,191.12
10668 Total : 8,280.14
8382322 12/24/2021 15230 CALPERS FISCAL SERVICES DIV 100000016655403 REPLACEMENT BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION - 2021 001-2101-4184 8,306.28
15230 Total : 8,306.28
8548574 9/17/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 73958959 VEHICLE FUEL/ 8-11 TO 9-10-21 001-1250 94.32
715-2101-4310 5,807.12
715-3104-4310 887.35
715-3302-4310 1,161.42
715-4204-4310 282.02
715-4206-4310 176.36
715-6101-4310 272.55
10668 Total : 8,681.14
9894382 7/16/2021 10668 EXXON MOBIL BUSINESS FLEET 72835012 VEHICLE FUEL/ 6-11 THROUGH 7-10-21 001-2024 90.03
715-2024 3,640.84
715-2101-4310 1,915.84
715-2024 290.13
715-3104-4310 289.80
715-2024 817.69
715-3302-4310 286.53
715-2024 279.10
715-4204-4310 189.80
715-2024 176.64
715-6101-4310 85.53
10668 Total : 8,061.93
1579591776 12/24/2021 01397 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT L0045324560 UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS/JUL - SEP 21 705-1215-4186 4,586.00
158-3756 -2,443.35
01397 Total : 2,142.65
71 12/30/2021
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
14 5:29:26PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
64 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 879,172.63 64 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 879,172.63
"I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 14 inclusive, of the check
register for 12/20/2021 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget."
By
Finance Director
Date 12/30/21
72 01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
1 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98800 1/6/2022 00138 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES INV366903 PD HELMETS WITH SHIELDS 001-2101-4201 611.80
00138 Total : 611.80
98801 1/6/2022 00016 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 4286211111 WATER USAGE - JUN 21 105-2024 3,585.09
001-2024 35,813.42
4286211111 WATER USAGE - AUG 21
105-2601-4303 5,368.97
001-6101-4303 42,993.95
001-4204-4303 2,139.69
001-3304-4303 304.24
4286211111 WATER USAGE - SEP 21
105-2601-4303 6,049.72
001-6101-4303 43,555.06
001-4204-4303 1,998.36
001-3304-4303 1,256.25
4286211111 WATER USAGE - OCT 21
105-2601-4303 5,530.55
001-6101-4303 29,562.58
001-4204-4303 1,827.31
001-3304-4303 296.81
00016 Total : 180,282.00
98802 1/6/2022 10838 CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC 4038244936 DETECTIVE COPIER/SEPT21-DEC21 715-2101-4201 694.55
10838 Total : 694.55
98803 1/6/2022 21720 CAPITAL WHOLESALE LIGHTING 447938 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ NOV 21 105-2601-4309 733.16
21720 Total : 733.16
98804 1/6/2022 20398 CONTINENTAL MAPPING SERVICE 120121 PUBLIC NOTICE SERVICES/ DEC 21 001-4101-4201 550.00
20398 Total : 550.00
98805 1/6/2022 14752 CRECY, STEVEN 8457826 PO 37069 REIMBURSEMENT/VETERANS MEMORIAL FLAG 001-2120 120.33
Attachment 273
01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
2 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98805 1/6/2022 14752 CRECY, STEVEN (Continued) Total : 120.33 98806 1/6/2022 22113 ELITE PRIVATE INVESTIGATION 202118 INVESTIGATION SERVICES/10-16 TO 11-16-21 001-2101-4201 2,841.00
202119 INVESTIGATION SERVICES/ 11-16 TO 12-4-21
001-2101-4201 1,976.00
22113 Total : 4,817.00
98807 1/6/2022 21217 FJR PACIFIC, INC. 24650 TROUBLESHOOT AC UNIT IN PD 001-4204-4201 345.00
21217 Total : 345.00
98808 1/6/2022 19884 FRONTIER 209-188-4669-0714985 LANDLINES/COMPUTER LINKS/DEC21 001-3302-4304 85.43
001-2101-4304 730.69
001-4204-4321 235.68
001-4202-4304 62.68
001-3304-4304 62.49
001-1204-4304 60.51
209-190-0013-1206175 PD COMPUTER CIRCUITS/DEC21
001-2101-4304 902.84
310-318-9210-0827185 PD JAIL BREATHALYZER/DEC21
001-2101-4304 76.32
310-318-9800-1204155 CHAMBERS EOC ANALOG LINE/NOV21
715-1206-4304 1,580.87
001-2026 45.78
001-2027 -45.78
310-318-9800-1204155 CHAMBERS EOC ANALOG LINE/DEC21
715-1206-4304 1,526.24
19884 Total : 5,323.75
98809 1/6/2022 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1033362 MAT REQ 435181/PLYWOOD/PD TRAINING 001-4204-4309 305.18
1034322 MAT REQ 435185/DRYWALL/YARD OFFICE
001-4204-4309 240.72
3012517 MAT REQ 638613/MEMORIAL BENCH MATERIALS
001-6101-4309 93.27
350069 PRESSURE WASHER/GRAFFITI REMOVAL
001-3104-4309 605.27
74 01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
3 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98809 1/6/2022 03432 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 5011110 MAT REQ 435182/ELECTRICAL WORK SUPPLIES
001-4204-4309 82.09
7514303 MAT REQ 008586/TOOLS/DOOR LOCK KIT
001-4204-4309 107.90
7514304 MAT REQ 008587/CORDLESS TOOL/ATOMIC KIT
001-6101-4309 431.92
8970382 MAT REQ 638536/CITY YARD SUPPLIES
001-4204-4309 444.19
9030165 MAT REQ 638502/POWER WASHER PARTS
001-3104-4309 187.27
9033900 MAT REQ 435184/PD DOOR
001-4204-4309 268.13
03432 Total : 2,765.94
98810 1/6/2022 05356 JOHN L HUNTER AND ASSOC INC HB1MS412109 MUNI STORM WATER PROG ADMIN/SEP 21 161-3109-4201 4,163.34
HB1MS412110 MUNI STORM WATER PROG ADMIN/ OCT 21
161-3109-4201 5,842.50
HB1MS412111 MUNI STORM WATER PROG ADMIN/ NOV 21
161-3109-4201 6,643.75
05356 Total : 16,649.59
98811 1/6/2022 22484 JONES, MARQUIS 37049 CITATION (33014054) REFUND - OVERPAYMENT 001-3302 28.00
22484 Total : 28.00
98812 1/6/2022 21552 K9 SERVICES LLC HBPD-23 K9 OFFICER MAINT TRAINING/ DEC 21 170-2105-4317 250.00
21552 Total : 250.00
98813 1/6/2022 00167 LEARNED LUMBER B758048-B760156 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/ DEC 21 001-6101-4309 785.01
00167 Total : 785.01
98814 1/6/2022 00183 MANHATTAN BEACH, CITY OF 494 MEDIAN MAINTENANCE 105-2601-4251 2,402.04
00183 Total : 2,402.04
98815 1/6/2022 21660 MILLER PLANNING ASSOCIATES LLC 20007-1121-12 ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE/ NOV 21 75 01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
4 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98815 1/6/2022 21660 MILLER PLANNING ASSOCIATES LLC (Continued) 001-4105-4201 5,180.00
21660 Total : 5,180.00
98816 1/6/2022 21596 ONWARD ENGINEERING 6104 PAVING/CONSTRUCT MGR/INSPECT/SEP 21 115-8186-4201 17,330.00
21596 Total : 17,330.00
98817 1/6/2022 09513 PACIFIC COAST CONSTRUCTION 958 INSTALL MONUMENT COVER/ 11TH ST @ PROSPE 001-3104-4201 1,455.00
09513 Total : 1,455.00
98818 1/6/2022 03353 SBCU VISA 01046 PO 37047 CC PD K9 FOOD 170-2105-4309 71.95
058029 TR 891 CC HOTEL/MOTOR SCHOOL/GRODRIGUEZ
001-2101-4317 166.88
075112 TR891 CC HOTEL/MOTOR SCHOOL/GRODRIGUEZ
001-2101-4314 155.68
08288 PO 36885 CC TRAINING/ENHANCED DRUG ID/V JOHNSON
001-2101-4313 100.00
11042021 TR 892CC TUITION/CIVILIAN LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE 001-2101-4317 3,000.00
111121 PO 36870 CC DEPOSIT/HOLIDAY STAFF PARTY
001-1203-4201 3,340.00
11172021 PO 36765 CC CASHIER TRAINING/11-17-21
001-1204-4317 360.00
12302021 CC REFUND/STAFF HOLIDAY PARTY
001-1203-4201 -3,340.00
31QCGD PO 37082 CC PD FILE SHARING/ADDT'L LICENSE/RENEW 001-2101-4305 7.23
5035 PO 37021 CC PD SANTA COSTUME/BATTERY STARTER
001-3302-4201 69.99
715-2101-4311 51.99
001-3302-4201 6.65
715-2101-4311 4.94
513168 PO 36582CC PD WATER DELIVERY/OCT21
001-2101-4305 485.81
780560 PO 36889 CC ANIMAL SERVICES/EUTHANASIA
001-3302-4201 29.77
76 01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
5 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98818 1/6/2022 03353 SBCU VISA (Continued)
780881 CC ANIMAL SERVICES/EUTHANASIA
001-3302-4201 27.00
8944 TR 881CC HOTEL/BEHAVORIAL ANALYSIS/T.MATEKO
001-2101-4312 821.40
9270658 CC PD HOLIDAY ELF COSTUMES
001-3302-4201 227.68
NOV 11 CC STAFF HOLIDAY PARTY
001-1203-4201 152.33
NW6Y/PO 37056 CC PD FILE SHARING LIC RENEWAL
001-2101-4201 1,200.00
PO 36862 CC PD VACUUM CLEANER
001-2101-4305 98.54
PO 36863 CC PD CABLE BIKE LOCKS
001-2101-4305 198.15
001-2101-4305 18.75
PO 36894 CC HIGH VISIBILITY RAIN JACKET/CSO ALVARADO
001-3302-4314 65.93
001-3302-4314 5.79
03353 Total : 7,326.46
98819 1/6/2022 22482 SONG, XI 37050 CITATION (33014614) REFUND - OVERPAYMENT 001-3302 28.00
22482 Total : 28.00
98820 1/6/2022 20236 SPECTRUM BUSINESS 8448300300046247 CITY HALL CABLE 11/24/21-12/23/21 715-4204-4201 109.85
8448300300046247 CITY HALL CABLE 12/24/21-1/23/22
715-4204-4201 109.85
8448300300049969 PD CABLE 11-11-21 TO 12-10-21
001-2101-4201 76.95
8448300300049969 PD CABLE 12-11-21 TO 1-10-22
001-2101-4201 76.95
8448300300088884 PW YARD CABLE 12/16/21-1/15/22
001-4202-4201 146.90
8448300300350359 1301 HERMOSA/RCC CONNECT/DEC21
001-2101-4304 149.99
8448300300350359 1301 HERMOSA/RCC CONNECT/JAN21
001-2101-4304 149.99
77 01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
6 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98820 1/6/2022 20236 SPECTRUM BUSINESS (Continued)
8448300300402150 1301 HERMOSA/540 CONNECT/DEC21
001-2101-4304 798.92
8448300300402150 1301 HERMOSA/540 PIER CONNECTION/JAN21 001-2101-4304 798.92
20236 Total : 2,418.32
98821 1/6/2022 22481 STEWART, KEVIN M 37051 CITATION (33014302) REFUND - OVERPAYMENT 001-3302 28.00
22481 Total : 28.00
98822 1/6/2022 11908 SWRCB SW-0222981 STORM WATER PERMIT/ OCT 21 TO SEP 22 161-3109-4251 10,602.00
WD-0190001 SEWER PERMIT/ 2021-22
160-3102-4251 3,326.00
11908 Total : 13,928.00
98823 1/6/2022 19082 T-MOBILE acct 954297746 PW YARD/CELL PHONES/HOTSPOTS/NOV21 001-4202-4304 321.48
acct 954297746 PW YARD/CELL PHONES/HOTSPOT/DEC21
001-4202-4304 321.48
19082 Total : 642.96
98824 1/6/2022 20670 TURBODATA SYSTEMS, INC. 36042 TICKET WRITER WIRELESS/OCT21-JAN21 001-3302-4201 3,750.00
20670 Total : 3,750.00
98825 1/6/2022 14148 UPS 000023R146012 SHIPPING SERVICES - PD/ DEC 21 001-2101-4305 11.13
14148 Total : 11.13
98826 1/6/2022 04768 UPTIME COMPUTER SERVICE 32283 MONTHLY PRINTER MAINT/ DEC 21 715-1206-4201 554.45
32315 MONTHLY PRINTER MAINT/ JAN 22
715-1206-4201 587.38
04768 Total : 1,141.83
98827 1/6/2022 09672 VCA COAST ANIMAL HOSPITAL 401468062 CARDBOARD ANIMAL/PET CARRIERS 001-3302-4305 172.75
001-3302-4305 16.41
78 01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
7 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
98827 1/6/2022 09672 VCA COAST ANIMAL HOSPITAL (Continued) Total : 189.16 5469331 12/24/2021 00170 SOCAL GAS 097 904 5900 3 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS - NOV 21 001-4204-4303 120.21
00170 Total : 120.21
5469361 12/24/2021 00170 SOCAL GAS 102 104 5900 3 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS - NOV 21 001-4204-4303 109.89
00170 Total : 109.89
5469602 12/24/2021 00170 SOCAL GAS 139 104 4600 7 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS - NOV 21 001-4204-4303 15.29
00170 Total : 15.29
5469631 12/24/2021 00170 SOCAL GAS 141 204 4600 1 CITY-OWNED BLDGS/NATURAL GAS - NOV 21 001-4204-4303 22.17
00170 Total : 22.17
32 Vouchers for bank code : boa Bank total : 270,054.59 32 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 270,054.59
79 01/06/2022
Check Register
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
8 5:14:25PM
Page:
Bank code : boa
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount
"I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages 1 to 8 inclusive, of the check
register for 1/6/2022 are accurate funds are available for payment, and are in conformance to the budget."
By
Finance Director
Date 1/6/22
80 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0048
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
MEMORANDUM REGARDING
REVENUE REPORT, COVID-19 REVENUE REPORTS,
EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT
FOR DECEMBER 2022
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
The December 2021 Revenue, COVID-19 Revenue Tracking, Expenditure, and CIP reports will be submitted with the Midyear Budget Review, which is scheduled for the March 8, 2022 City Council meeting.
Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 81
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0047
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
MEMORANDUM REGARDING
CITY TREASURER’S REPORT AND CASH BALANCE REPORT
(City Treasurer Karen Nowicki)
The December 2021 City Treasurer’s Report and Cash Balance Report will be submitted with the Midyear Budget Review, which is scheduled for the March 8, 2022 City Council meeting.
Respectfully Submitted by: Karen Nowicki, City Treasurer Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 82
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0046
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
AS OF JANUARY 13, 2022
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of January 13, 2022.
Executive Summary:
In order to provide greater clarity of the City’s ongoing efforts to make accessibility improvements, the Capital Improvement Program Status Report was revised. The report now contains a column titled “ADA Component” to indicate projects that include an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvement. In addition, the “Project Description” column was expanded to contain a description of the ADA improvements.
Analysis:
Number of Projects/Studies by Phase # of Projects/Studies Study/Conceptual Planning 9
Preliminary Design 9
Final Engineering Design 16
Project Approvals/ Bidding 2
Construction 5
Closeout 4
Total Projects 39
Total Studies 6
Number of Projects/Studies by Completion Timeline # of Projects/Studies 1 - Complete by end of FY 21-22 11
2 - Complete in FY 22-23 7
3 - 3 years to completion 0
4 - 5 years to completion 0
5 - TBD 23
Projects/Studies Complete 4
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 83
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0046
Number of Projects/Studies by Completion Timeline # of Projects/Studies 1 - Complete by end of FY 21-22 11
2 - Complete in FY 22-23 7
3 - 3 years to completion 0
4 - 5 years to completion 0
5 - TBD 23
Projects/Studies Complete 4
Total Projects 39
Total Studies 6
Number of Projects/Studies by Category # of Projects/Studies Street & Highway Improvements 14
Sewer & Storm Drain Improvements 6
Park Improvements 4
Public Building & Ground Improvements 21
Total Projects 39
Total Studies 6
# of Projects/Studies
Number of Projects/Studies by Manager Lead Support Total Lucho Rodriguez 4 3 7
Romany Basilyous 7 0 7
Andrew Nguyen 6 3 8
Michelle Licata 5 1 6
Jonathan Pascual 5 1 6
John Cordova 1 0 1
Doug Krauss 4 1 5
Lisa Nichols 2 0 2
TBD 11 0 11
Total Projects/Studies 45
Attachments:
Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of January 13, 2022.
Respectfully Submitted by: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 84
City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 1-13-22 UPDATED FY 2021-22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold.
Light Blue indicates projects milestone updates.
Project CategoryADA Component
CIP No. Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual Planning
Preliminary Design
Final Engineering Design
Project Approvals/Bidding
Construction
Closeout
Tentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
SH
X
102 Bus Stops Improvements $ 900,000 Romany
Basilyous X
Complete Preliminary
Design -
3/22
09/22
Final Engineering Design. This project will improve bus stops throughout the City.
These improvements will include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible curb ramps, concrete bus pads, crosswalk, striping improvements, furnishing, and other general improvements within direct vicinity of the bus stops.
SH 108 Pay-By-App Parking Signage (NEW) $ 75,000 TBD
X TBD TBD
Final Engineering Design. Pending staff availability. The implementation of a pay by app system will require the installation of signs that will provide instructions for users and zone numbers necessary to use the system. The industry recommendation is that at least two signs be installed per block. At this time, most vendors providing pay by app systems will provide the signs at no additional cost to the City but require City staff to install them and any additional poles. It is estimated that the City will need approximately 375 signs installed, and 30 new poles installed in some locations due to a lack of existing poles. The installation would occur in areas of the City where paid parking is currently provided.
SH
X
143 PCH Mobility Improvement Project $ 148,243 Lucho
Rodriguez
X TBD TBD
On Hold. Study/Conceptual Planning. Metro Approved funding of $1.8 million for the City for the project development phases - PA&ED (Project Approval and Environmental Document) as a result of Public Work's Measure M application in 2020. Metro is procuring the services of their on-call consultants to assist with this phase. Estimated date of kick-off meeting, February 2022.
This project would retain the existing number of lanes including north and south bound flex lanes and maintain lane widths of ten (10) feet, and flex lanes of twelve (12) feet with zero (0) feet shoulders. Collectively, the improvements will address existing, near-term, and long-range future traffic conditions along this corridor by improving intersection operations, reducing instances of unsafe turning movements, create a safe and more comfortable environment for pedestrians and transit riders, and improving the efficient movement of vehicles along the corridor.
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.
SH 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street $ 159,500 Doug Krauss Michelle Licata X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
10/22
TBD
Final Engineering Design. Preparation of plans and specifications by consultant (CWE) through grant managed by City of Torrance. This project is also part of Study 103. Consultant selected and preparing plans.
The project will design and implement Low Impact Development (LID) and green infrastructure on Hermosa Ave from 4th Street to Herondo Avenue, which will include a variety of green street design elements. This project is part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant recipient for preliminary design. This project is also part of a multicity green street project lead by City of Torrance.
SH 186 Street Improvements - Various Locations $ 1,485,095 Romany Basilyous
X Closeout Closeout
Closeout. This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This project also includes the resurfacing of 24th Street between Valley Drive and Park Avenue. The scope of work includes the construction of curb and gutter as needed to correct street drainage deficiencies as well as lowering of public utilities (by utility companies) to standard depth to permit the proper street construction. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. Project will be bided out together with Project 190.
SH
X
188 Strand Bikeway and Walkway Improvements at 35th Street $ 10,000 TBD
X TBD TBD
Part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant. Consultant selected and preparing report.
This project would provide improved accessibility and connectivity for bicyclists travelling between the Cities of Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach via The Strand at 35th Street. This project is part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant recipient for preliminary design.
The project will also consider the addition of a dedicated ADA path to provide greater ADA accessibility to The Strand.
SH
X
190 Annual Street Improvements $ 200,000 Romany
Basilyous
X Closeout Closeout
Closeout. This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans. Project will be combined with Project 186.
Project will construct new ADA curb ramps. Estimated cost of ADA improvements is $170,000 SH
X
191 Annual Street Improvements $ 45,000 Romany
Basilyous
X
Complete Preliminary
Design -
3/22
TBD
Preliminary Design. This project provides for pavement rehabilitation of streets at various locations. The project will also repair/replace deteriorated portions of sidewalk, curb and gutter, and curb ramps. This work will be performed following the sewer and storm drain repairs identified in the Sewer and Drainage Master Plans.
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.
SH
X
192 Annual Striping Improvements $ 100,000 Michelle Licata X Closeout Closeout
Closeout. This project provides traffic striping, markings, and signage improvements and modifications throughout the City at various locations to improve safety and visibility. This project will help address needed thermoplastic striping which the City is not capable of installing directly.
Project includes restriping and new signage to bring City ADA parking spots in City lots to comply with current ADA standards.
Estimated cost of ADA improvements is $32,000
SH 193 Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements $ 500,000 Andrew Nguyen X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
TBD
Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm finalizing plans and specifications. This project will implement rectangular rapid flashing beacons and other measures at several uncontrolled pedestrian crossings on Hermosa Avenue at 4th, 6th, 19th, 24th, 25th Streets and the crossing in front of Clark Building on Valley Drive.
SH
X
194 Annual Striping Improvements (NEW) $ 200,000 Michelle Licata X
Complete Preliminary
Design -
3/22
TBD
Preliminary Design. This project provides traffic striping, markings, and signage improvements and modifications throughout the City at various locations to improve safety and visibility. This project will help address needed thermoplastic striping which the City is not capable of installing directly.
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.
SH
X
195 City Sidewalk Improvements (NEW) $ 50,000 Michelle Licata X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
2/22
TBD
Final Engineering Design. This project provides repairs, replacements, and improvements to sidewalks throughout the City at various locations to maintain and improve safety.
Improvements will include ADA components by increasing sidewalk accessibility to be determined during design.
Categories:
SH = Street/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 1 of 4
85 City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 1-13-22 UPDATED FY 2021-22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold.
Light Blue indicates projects milestone updates.
Project CategoryADA Component
CIP No. Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual Planning
Preliminary Design
Final Engineering Design
Project Approvals/Bidding
Construction
Closeout
Tentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
SSD 417 Annual Storm Drain Improvements - Various Locations $ 2,044,966 Romany Basilyous
X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
08/22
Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm finalizing plans and specifications. Storm drain improvements throughout the City. Locations will be as identified and prioritized per the Storm Drain Master Plan.
Projects will address deficiencies, ponding, and repairs as well as where new storm drains are needed citywide. This project will also address operational deficiencies at the outfall structures at 18th Street and 19th Street. Improvements include for design and construction activities on an annual basis. Project to be bided out together with Project 422.
SSD 419 Storm Drain Pipe Screens $ 150,000 Romany
Basilyous
Doug Krauss X Closeout Closeout
Closeout. The City has revised its strategy for addressing the Santa Monica Bay Debris Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) using State Board-approved full capture devices or systems to achieve 100% reduction of trash from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). The City will install approximately 160 screen assemblies inside various storm drain catch basins throughout the City, in front of the outlet pipe, preventing debris from entering the storm drain system. They City has installed approximately 120 screens previously.
SSD 421 Annual Sewer Improvements $ 2,414,774 Andrew
Nguyen X Complete Construction -
2/22 03/22
Construction. Begin Construction November , 2021. Project consists of 2 phases. Phase 1 includes lining work and point repairs. Phase 2 includes point repairs, pipe replacement, and maintenance access hole rehabilitation. Phase 2 to start after completion of Phase 1.
This project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan.
SSD 422 Annual Storm Drain Improvements $ 500,000 Romany Basilyous X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
08/22
Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm finalizing plans and specifications. Storm drain improvements throughout the City. Locations will be as identified and prioritized per the Storm Drain Master Plan.
Projects will address deficiencies, ponding, and repairs as well as where new storm drains are needed citywide. This project will also address operational deficiencies at the outfall structures at 18th Street and 19th Street. Improvements include for design and construction activities on an annual basis. Project will be bid out together with Project 417.
SSD 423 Annual Sewer Improvements $ 250,000 Andrew
Nguyen X TBD TBD
Preliminary Design. This project includes design and construction of sewer improvements and repairs based on the Sewer Master Plan.
SSD 424 Annual Storm Drain Improvements $ 250,000 TBD
X TBD TBD
Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability. Storm drain improvements throughout the City. Locations will be as identified and prioritized per the Storm Drain Master Plan.
Projects will address deficiencies, ponding, and repairs as well as where new storm drains are needed citywide. This project will also address operational deficiencies at the outfall structures at various locations. Improvements include for design and construction activities on an annual basis.
PI 548 Park Planting Improvements (NEW) $ 50,000 John Cordova X 06/22 06/22
Construction. City landscape contractors planting new planting. This project provides new plantings needed throughout the City's parks.
PI
X
549 Temporary Beach Accessible Routes (NEW) $ 90,000 Andrew Nguyen X Complete Construction -
3/22 04/22
Construciton. City is awaiting delivery of mobi mats to deploy. This project is to continue the City's temporary beach access routes pilot program. Access routes will be established on the beach at 2nd Street, 11th Street, and 22nd Street.
ADA improvements are integral to the project.
PBG
X
601 Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps $ 63,710 Jonathan
Pascual
Andrew Nguyen X
Complete Project
Approvals/Bidding -
2/22
05/22
Project Approvals/Bidding. Preparing to bid project in February with new online system. This project provides improvements and relocation of sidewalks, curb ramps and obstructions along Prospect Avenue in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards. Project to be bided out together with Project 698.
ADA improvements are integral to the project.
PBG 603 South Park Slope and Irrigation Repairs (NEW) $ 275,000 Jonathan Pascual
Lucho
Rodriguez
X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
06/22
Final Engineering Design. Finalizing irrigation and landscaping plans and specifications for phase 1.
This project will address sloped areas around the playground area at South Park. Funding would be utilized to install interim measures in order to open up the area to the public while the City pursues more permanent measures for repairs required of the entire park, including irrigation and landscaping.
PBG
X
604 City Wide ADA Improvements (NEW) $ 50,000 TBD
X TBD TBD
Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability. This project provides improvements city wide in order to comply with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards along with the City's Transition Plan being developed.
ADA improvements are integral to the project.
PBG 608 Downtown Lighting Improvements $ 58,519 TBD
X TBD TBD
Final Engineering Design. Pending staff availability. This project will improve safety, security and ambiance in the downtown area through lighting improvements as determined by the Downtown Security Assessment Report.
PBG 609 Downtown Strategic Plan Implementation $ 460,166 Andrew Nguyen X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
06/22
Final Engineering Design. Preparing plans and specifications for Pier Plaza catenary lights and light dimming units. Preparing assessment of Hermosa Ave and Pier Ave median electric system.
The purpose of this project is to mitigate safety concerns with lighting improvements for the City’s downtown area. This project will install catenary lights and dimming units on Pier Plaza.
PBG 615 New Corporate Yard Facilities $ 1,291,891 Doug Krauss Lucho
Rodriguez
X TBD TBD
Preliminary Design. This project is for the design and construction of a new city yard.
Construction will be done in two phases. Phase 1 to include one metal prefabricated building to house a new mechanic, paint/sign shop and contracted services. New wash down station area. Phase 2 to include demolition of existing buildings.
Construction of new administration building. General yard improvements (fencing, landscaping, drainage).
PBG 629 Municipal Pier Structural Assessment and Repairs $ 413,075 Michelle Licata X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
09/22
Final Engineering Design. Consultant to update and finalize plans in conjunction with CIP 650. Repairs of the municipal pier structural elements including the piles, pile caps, deck and the lifeguard storage room.
Categories:
SH = Street/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 2 of 4
86 City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 1-13-22 UPDATED FY 2021-22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold.
Light Blue indicates projects milestone updates.
Project CategoryADA Component
CIP No. Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual Planning
Preliminary Design
Final Engineering Design
Project Approvals/Bidding
Construction
Closeout
Tentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
PBG 660 Municipal Pier Electrical Repairs $ 520,284 Michelle Licata X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
09/22
Final Engineering Design. Consultant to update and finalize plans in conjunction with CIP 629. The pier electrical repairs will involve the replacement of existing conduit, junction boxes, connections and wiring so that the lights can be functional. The project will also eliminate the service box towards the end of the pier and create a new service connection point for the foghorn at the end of the pier. This project will also include the replacement of the bollard lighting at the pier with new LED lighting fixtures.
PBG
X
669 City Park Restrooms and Renovation $ 2,450,925 Lucho Rodriguez
Jonathan
Pascual
X Complete Construction -
3/22 06/22
Construction. This project consists of construction of new ADA compliant restrooms at Forts Lots-of-Fun, Seaview Parkette, South Park, and Clark Field. This project also plans to renovate existing restrooms at South Park and Clark Field.
ADA improvements are integral to the project.
PBG
X
682 Parking Lot D Improvements $ 480,836 Doug Krauss
X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
3/22
12/22
Final Engineering Design. Coastal Conservancy Board grant approved in April 2021. Pending application for construction funds with Measure W grant. Finalizing plans.
The project will install a rapid electric vehicle charging station, expand bicycle parking and capture and treat storm water run-off from road and parking surfaces.
Project will include new ADA ramp to the parking lot and new ADA parking spots. Estimated cost of ADA improvements is $15,000
PBG 684 Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Renovations $ 192,880 TBD
X TBD TBD
Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability. This project will add restrooms to the EOC and renovate the adjacent room for future EOC uses. The EOC is located within a building designated as a historical building, which will require a Certificate of Appropriateness to complete the repairs. This project will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 includes restroom construction including flooring, lighting, wall and ceiling repairs, painting, new plumbing, and installing fixtures. Phase 2 includes complete room renovation including new flooring, ceiling, lighting, furnishings, and relocation of Emergency System IT equipment, including a new switch, 2 UPC batteries, and firewall to support the EOC. Security Improvements to include new key fob locking systems.
PBG
X
689 Clark Building Renovations $ 399,889 Jonathan
Pascual
Lucho
Rodriguez
X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
2/22
08/22
Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm finalizing plans and specifications. Will Present to City Council.
The project proposes:
1. Design, Operational Review
2. Kitchen Remodel - including new commercial appliances, sinks, countertops, lighting, tile, flooring, doors and ADA upgrades.
3. Restrooms Remodel - including new flooring, fixtures, stalls, sinks, toilets, lighting, and ADA upgrades. Electrical, plumbing, sewer line upgrades.
4. Install new Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning.
5. Acoustic panels and new lighting throughout ballroom area.
6. ADA upgrades to entrance building entrance points.
ADA improvements are integral to the project.
PBG
X
692 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehabilitation $ 530,000 TBD
X TBD TBD
Study/Conceptual Planning. Pending staff availability. This project proposes to construct a new restroom facility which includes replacement of the entire building; restrooms; appurtenant plumbing; ADA improvements for compliance. This project will also include the replacement of the existing sewer lift station components which includes 2 submersible pumps; motor control panel; associated plumbing; addition of telemetry for condition/outage notifications.
New restrooms will be ADA compliant.
PBG
X
695 Parking Lot A Improvements $ 592,260 TBD
X TBD TBD
Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability. This project will consist of upgrading Parking Lot A to meet ADA standards, with improvements including:
• New layout to maximize parking capacity and improve circulation. • Consideration of the layout of parking spaces on 11th Street and explore incorporating 11th Street parking spaces into the Lot A pay station system.
• New surfacing and lighting.
• New trash enclosures adjacent to commercial buildings and removal of the trash enclosure and joint compactor. • Low impact development elements including permeable pavers and landscaping.
Coastal Commission permits will be required.
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.
PBG 696 Police Station Improvements $ 28,500 TBD
X TBD TBD
Preliminary Design. Pending staff availability. The Police Station is in need of improvements including increased security measures and improvements to report writing room and evidence and property room. The restrooms in the basement of the Police Station are in need of improvements.
PBG
X
698 ADA improvements $ 71,298 Jonathan
Pascual
Andrew Nguyen X
Complete Project
Approvals/Bidding -
2/22
05/22
Project Approvals/Bidding. Preparing to bid project in February. The project proposes: Improvements and relocation of sidewalks, curb ramps and obstructions along Prospect Avenue in order to follow the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meet the latest Federal Standards. Project to be bided out together with Project 601.
ADA improvements are integral to the project.
PBG
X
699 Parking Structure (Lot C) Improvements (NEW) $ 1,200,000 Jonathan Pascual
Andrew Nguyen
X
Complete Final
Engineering Design -
5/22
TBD
Final Engineering Design. On-call design firm finalizing plans and specifications. This project provides repairs and improvements to the City's parking structure (Lot C) based on the assessment report from Study 694 Parking Structure (Lot C) Structural Assessment including structural, elevator, and electrical repairs.
Improvements will include ADA components to be determined during design.
Categories:
SH = Street/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 3 of 4
87 City of Hermosa Beach
Updated 1-13-22 UPDATED FY 2021-22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Grey indicates projects on hold.
Light Blue indicates projects milestone updates.
Project CategoryADA Component
CIP No. Project Name Project Budget Project Manager
Study/Conceptual Planning
Preliminary Design
Final Engineering Design
Project Approvals/Bidding
Construction
Closeout
Tentative Date to Next
Milestone/ Update
Estimated Project Completion
Date Current Project Status Project Description
SH
X
101 Hermosa Avenue Greenwich Village Street Realignment (STUDY)
$ 10,000 TBD
X TBD TBD
Part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant. Consultant selected and preparing report.
This study will evaluate potential improvements at the intersections of:
• Hermosa Avenue and Greenwich Village; and
• Manhattan Avenue and Greenwich Village/27th Street
The study will evaluate opportunities improve the flow and visibility for pedestrian, bikes, and vehicles at the two intersections.
This study is part of Study 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment Grant recipient for preliminary design.
Study will also evaluate potential ADA improvements.
PBG 103 Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment
(STUDY)
$ 279,058 Doug Krauss
X
Complete
Study/Conceptual
Planning - 2/22
02/22
Study/Conceptual Planning. Consultant selected and preparing report. This study will assess the risk of sea level rise in three areas along Hermosa Avenue, 35th Street, Greenwich Village, and 4th Street to Herondo Avenue. It incorporates three other projects. Project 164 Hermosa Avenue Green Street, Project 188 Strand Bikeway and Walkway Improvements at 35th Street, and Study 101 Hermosa Avenue Greenwich Village Street Realignment.
PI 538 Citywide Park Master Plan
(STUDY)
$ 193,368 Lisa Nichols
X TBD TBD
Study/Conceptual Planning. The City is seeking to prepare a Parks Master Plan that achieves the following goals:
• Engages the community and local recreational organizations in a dialogue about parks and open space resources in Hermosa Beach;
• Identifies the current demand/utilization and the future/evolving parks and recreational facility needs for the Hermosa Beach community;
• Leverages the vision and goals of the recently adopted General Plan and the Community Decision-Making Tool; • Identifies an appropriate balance between organized and informal recreational activities at the City’s parks and open spaces; • Serves as a dynamic useful planning and implementation document that enjoys broad community and political support; • Provides a comprehensive strategy to maintain, rehabilitate and improve the City’s network of parks, facilities, and open space assets, including current unfunded park and recreational opportunities; • Evaluates the effective use of the City’s financial and physical resources and opportunities to fund implementation of the recommendations in the Master Plan.
PI
X
544 Greenbelt Accessible Path Assessment
(STUDY)
$ 10,000 Lucho
Rodriguez X
Complete
Study/Conceptual
Planning - 3/22
03/22
Study/Conceptual Planning. Preparing report. Determine the feasibility of installing an ADA surface path on the Greenbelt to provide a firm, natural looking and permeable path that increases accessibility for the disabled and boosts accessibility for all.
PBG 605 City Facilities Condition and Needs Assessment (NEW) (STUDY)
$ 175,000 TBD
X TBD TBD
Study/Conceptual Planning. Pending staff availability. Prepare condition assessment reports for City facilities throughout the City to understand the infrastructure improvement needs.
PBG 668 Library Community Needs Assessment
(STUDY)
$ 60,000 Lisa Nichols
X TBD TBD
On Hold. On hold until funding opportunities become available for a new or renovated library facility.
Phase II consists of preparation of conceptual designs and estimates for:
• Keeping the city’s library at its current location, to include: Renovation and expansion of existing building or adding a second floor to the existing building (before preparation of renovation schemes for the existing building, the structural condition must be assessed to make sure that the building is not beyond its useful life); Construction of a two (2) story library building at the existing location; or
• Construction of a new library at a new site
• Relocation of “Friends of the Library” from Bard Street to a more appropriate location. Funding is reimbursed to the City through the Library’s Excess Operating Funds through agreement with the LA County Library. Other funding options will be explored.
SH 160 PCH Traffic Improvements
(RECONCILIATION)
$ 160,000 Lucho
Rodriguez
X Complete Construction -
3/22 03/22
Project was to be closed out in FY 19-20 but delayed due to modifications requiring Caltrans approval. Funding approved by Council during Midyear budget. Project to be completed and closed out by FY 21-22. Caltrans pre-inspection meeting schedule to finalize work in January.
The purpose of this project is to improve operational mobility along State Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway) which also provides operational relief to I-405 by improving operations in a parallel route. The proposed project also includes improvements including but not restricted to truck turning radius, ADA curb ramps, striping and pedestrian signal improvements of the segment on PCH between Anita Street and Artesia Boulevard.
Pedestrian signal, crosswalks and ADA curb ramps improvements at the intersections of PCH and Pier Avenue and PCH and Aviation Boulevard including improvements at intersection to aid trucks turning onto Aviation.
PBG 760 Tree Well Grates
(RECONCILIATION)
$ 51,068 Andrew
Nguyen X TBD TBD
Project has been under dispute resolution. Funds to be used to purchase and install tree well grates on Hermosa Ave.
This project will install iron tree grates in existing tree wells on Hermosa Ave.
Categories:
SH = Street/Highway
SSD = Sewer/Storm Drain
PI = Parks
PBG = Public Building and Ground 4 of 4
88 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0045
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2021
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of November 17, 2021.
Attachments:
Action Minutes of the November 17, 2021 Public Works Commission Meeting Respectfully Submitted by: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 89
ACTION MINUTES
PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2021
CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1315 VALLEY DRIVE
6:00 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner
Janice Brittain
Commissioner
Scott Hayes
Chair
David Grethen
Vice Chair
Andrea N. Giancoli
Commissioner
Kathy Dunbabin
********************************************************************************************* ******************
THIS MEETING IS HELD PURSUANT TO AB361 BECAUSE STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ARE RECOMMENDING MEASURES TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING. ANY OR ALL COMMISSION MEMBERS MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE/VIRTUAL MEETING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE BY TELECONFERENCE.
********************************************************************************************* ******************
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Members of the public may email comments to [email protected] until 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date. Members of the public may also participate by phone or through Zoom.
JOIN THE VIRTUAL PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING AT:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83076777652?pwd=Z3lQcDFpUU1obDVuMUpnMGlQME1pUT09 OR
PARTICIPATE BY PHONE:
1. Email [email protected] to be added to the speaker list. Please indicate which item you would like to speak on.
2. Dial-in to meeting:
• Toll Free: 877-853-5257
• Public Works Commission Webinar ID: 830 7677 7652
• Passcode: 748636
3. ATTENDEES WILL BE MUTED UNTIL THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PERIOD IS OPENED. When you are called on to speak, press * 6 to unmute your line. Comments from the public are limited to 3 minutes per speaker.
Note: Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information (i.e. phone numbers, addresses, etc.) that you do not want to be published.
Public Works Commission agendas and staff reports are available for your review on the City’s web site located at www.hermosabeach.gov.
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
90 2
3. Roll Call
Present: Chairperson Grethen, Vice Chairperson Giancoli, Commissioner Dunbabin, Commissioner Brittain, Commissioner Hayes
Staff present: Joe SanClemente, Director of Public Works; Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer, Andrew Nguyen, Interim Associate Engineer; Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager; Jonathan Pascual, Assistant Engineer; Kambria Vint, Recreation Coordinator; John Natalizio, City Attorney’s Office
4. Approval of Action Minutes
A. September 15, 2021
ACTION: Commissioner Dunbabin motioned to receive and approve minutes. Seconded by Vice Chairperson Giancoli, the motion passed 5-0.
5. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items: Anyone wishing to address the Commission on items pertaining to Public Works that are not listed on the agenda and pertaining to Public Works may do so at this time. Comments from the public are limited to three minutes per speaker.
No public comments received.
6. Correspondence
A. Written Communication from Anthony Higgins
B. Written Communication from R. Bender
ACTION: Commissioner Hayes motioned to receive and file the written communications.
Seconded by Commissioner Dunbabin, the motion passed 5-0.
7. Presentations
A. West Coast Sea Water Barrier Project Update – Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager
The upgrades to the wells within the City of Hermosa Beach have been completed and only landscape repairs are pending. A kiosk describing the project will be installed at the intersection of Gould Avenue and Valley Drive along the Greenbelt. Further notification of the finalization of the project will be posted on the City website.
B. Hermosa Ave Green Street Project Update – Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager
Staff is seeking funds for the construction phase. The engineering phase is in progress.
Outreach consultants are hosting pop-up events on November 18th and 29th to inform the public about the project. Outreach will continue when the project moves into the construction phase.
C. Climate Adaptation Project (Sea Level Rise Risk Assessment) Update – Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager
The project is anticipated to be completed in February 2022 to meet grant deadlines. Staff is currently completing a cost/benefit analysis and working on developing final concept designs 91 3
based on feedback received at community meetings. Final concept designs will be presented during the virtual meeting scheduled for January 12, 2022.
D. 26th Street One-Way Conversion Project Update – Douglas Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager
On November 3, 2021, a community meeting was held to discuss the project. More communications are scheduled for early 2022, which will determine the next steps.
8. Items for Consideration
A. Appointment of Public Works Commission Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for 2022 and Meeting Schedule for 2022
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Public Works Commission consider:
1. Appoint the Public Works Commission Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for 2022; ACTION: Commissioner Brittain motioned to appoint the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for 2022 following the adopted chair rotation tradition, which is based on seniority. In 2022, Vice Chairperson Giancoli will become the Chairperson and Commissioner Dunbabin will be the Vice Chairperson.
2. Receive and file the Public Works Commission Meeting Schedule for 2022.
ACTION: Commissioner Brittain motioned to receive and file the Public Works Commission Meeting Schedule for 2022. Seconded by Commissioner Dunbabin, the motion passed 5-0.
B. Ordinance to Require Property Owners to Repair and Maintain the Parkway Abutting Their Real Property and Amending the City’s Municipal Code Related to Payment for Tree Removal Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Public Works Commission consider:
1. Recommend the City Council consider and approve an Ordinance titled, “An Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, Adding Chapter 12.42 (Parkway Maintenance and Repair) to Title 12 (Streets, Sidewalks and Public Places) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to Require Property Owners to Repair and Maintain the Parkway Abutting their Real Property and Amending the City’s Municipal Code Related to Payment for Tree Removal”.
ACTION: Commissioner Hayes motioned to direct staff to remove section 12.42.020 (Liability for Injuries to the Public) from the ordinance and modify the language of 12.42.040 (Failure to Make Repair) to eliminate the penalty of misdemeanor and replace it with language that enables the City to issue citations to homeowners that are refusing to repair after being notified by the City; further direct staff to develop guidelines that dictate what is and what is not allowed in a parkway, a list of what conditions are considered dangerous, and rules that dictate when an encroachment permit is required; and to extend the time to correct beyond 30 days at the director’s discretion as long as the homeowner can show a good faith effort to correct the condition. Seconded by Vice Chair Giancoli, the motion passed 5-0.
92 4
C. Design Updates for Capital Improvement Project 689 Clark Building Renovations Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Public Works Commission consider:
1. Recommend the City Council consider and approve the Clark Building Renovation plans.
ACTION: Commissioner Hayes motioned to recommend City Council’s consideration and approval of the Clark Building renovation plans with the acknowledgement that staff will strive to incorporate the input they received from Public Works Commission at their discretion. Seconded by Vice Chair Giancoli, the motion passed 5-0.
9. Commissioners’ Reports
None.
10. Monthly Reports
A. Monthly Activity Reports (Provided for Information Only) B. CIP Status with Verbal Updates
Deputy City Engineer highlighted the following:
• CIP 164 – Hermosa Avenue Green Street – The project is transitioning to the final engineering design.
• CIP 186 – Street Improvements – Various Locations – The project was completed. • CIP 192 – Annual Striping Improvements – The project was completed. • CIP 194 – Annual Striping Improvements (NEW) – The project was completed. • CIP 195 – City Sidewalk Improvements (NEW) – Staff is in the process of identifying the best locations and starting design.
• CIP 417 – Annual Storm Drain Improvements-Various Locations – The design is soon to be completed. Advertising for bids is to follow. • CIP 419 – Storm Drain Pipe Screens – Staff is working with LA County to close-out the project.
• CIP 421 – Annual Sewer Improvements – The construction phase is soon to begin. • CIP 422 – Annual Storm Drain Improvements – The project is in the final engineering design phase. The construction phase is soon to begin.
• CIP 160 – PCH Traffic Improvements – Staff was notified the final piece of equipment needed to close-out the project was manufactured and expected to be installed in December or January 2022, which completes the project.
93 5
• CIP 669 – City Park Restrooms and Renovation – Staff met with the contractor and visited the sites. The restrooms at South Park are fully framed. Renovations at South Park also include the construction of a brand new sewer system. The foundations have been completed for the restrooms at Fort Lots of Fun and Seaview Park. The next step is the completion of the frames. This project is on track to be completed by the allowed time.
• CIP 689 – Clark Building Renovations – The project is moving along, but there is a tree possibly preventing the sidewalk from being constructed. If that is the case, the tree will be removed.
• CIP 692 – 14th Street Beach Restroom Rehabilitation – Staff is awaiting the structural report.
11. Director’s Verbal Updates
Director SanClemente provided the following updates:
• The department hired four new temporary employees, including two temporary Maintenance I Workers and two Assistant Engineers. In addition, two interns were hired to provide assistance in Engineering. The department also posted six new positions. • The beach mats were pulled back from the winter length burn by the pier, so the path is shorter.
• The bike racks near the former Mermaid Restaurant were removed to accommodate events. Staff plans to relocate these racks and is working to identity a location. • The department lost a team member, Alfonso Gallegos, who had been with the City approximately four years. His last day with the City was November 6, 2021. The team is working through the loss. City Council adjourned their meeting in his honor.
12. Commissioner Items (Other Matters)
Chairperson Grethen inquired about the status of CIP 186 – Street Improvements – Various Locations and CIP 190 – Annual Street Improvements. Deputy City Engineer Rodriguez noted the project will be completed by City staff as it is more cost effective. The design is to be completed soon. He also shared the PMP is completed, and the final step will help determine what areas should be paved next.
13. Commissioner’s Announcements
Commissioner Brittain invited everyone to participate in the Hermosa Holiday Weekend activities, including the Tree Lighting Ceremony on Sunday, November 21, 2021. Commissioner Dunbabin encouraged everyone to support local businesses.
As Chairperson Grethen’s term as Chair came to an end, Commissioner Hayes thanked him for his leadership. In response. Chairperson Grethen congratulated Commissioner Hayes on his one-year anniversary as Public Works Commissioner. He also commented on his experience as Chair and expressed his gratitude for the opportunity.
14. Adjournment
94 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0015
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 2022
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the canceled Planning Commission meeting of January 18, 2022.
Attachments:
Action Minutes of the January 18, 2022 Canceled Planning Commission Meeting Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 95
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA
90254
City of Hermosa Beach
Action Minutes - Draft
Planning Commission
Chair
Marie Rice
Vice Chair
David Pedersen
Commissioners
Stephen Izant
Peter Hoffman
Rob Saemann
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 6:00 PM
*******************************************************************************************************
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JANUARY 18, 2022 HAS BEEN CANCELED DUE TO LACK OF QUORUM. ******************************************************************************************************* Call to Order
Roll Call
Commissioner Rob Saemann, Commissioner Peter Hoffman, Commissioner Stephen Izant, Vice Chair David Pedersen, and Chair Marie Rice Excused: 5 -
Absent: 0
Public Comment
Noting that tonight's regular meeting had been canceled, the meeting was adjourned due to lack of quorum.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:01 pm.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1
96 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
(Community Development Director Ken Robertson)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the February 15, 2022 Planning Commission tentative future agenda items.
Attachments:
Planning Commission February 15, 2022 Tentative Future Agenda Respectfully Submitted by: Ken Robertson, Community Development Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 97
\\CHB-FS-01\Vol1\B95\CD\CC\CC 2022\1-25-22\Planning Commission Tentative Agenda for 2-15-22.docx Revised 01/13/2022 5:31 PM
Tentative Future Agenda
PLANNING COMMISSION
City of Hermosa Beach
February 15, 2022
Regular Meeting
6:00 P.M.
Project Title Public
Notice
Meeting
Date
⇒ Comedy and Magic Club - 1018 Hermosa Ave. – Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Parking Plan Amendment. 2/3/22 2/15/22 ⇒ 204-210 Pacific Coast Highway – Conditional Use Permit for drivethru (Starbucks). 2/3/22 2/15/22 ⇒ Rotation of Chair to Pedersen, Vice Chair to Izant n/a 2/15/22 ⇒ Triannual CUP Review (Staff Item) n/a 2/15/22
Upcoming and Pending Projects
⇒ 825 15th Street – Final Map
⇒ 685 5th Street – Two unit condominium project.
⇒ 301-311 31st Street – Lot Merger
⇒ City Yard – Precise Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Environmental Review – pending environmental clearance. ⇒ 911 1st Street – Zone and General Plan Amendment, Precise Development Plan and Planned Unit Development for a 12-unit condominium project. 98 City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0037
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
FINDINGS TO HOLD REMOTE TELECONFERENCE/MEETINGS,
PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361
(Interim City Clerk Susan Morrow)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council authorize remote teleconference/virtual meetings of all City of Hermosa Beach legislative bodies in accordance with Assembly Bill 361 (“AB 361”), by finding that:
(1) a statewide state of emergency is currently in place; (2) state and local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID-19; and meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
Background:
All meetings of the City’s legislative bodies are subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code §§ 54950 et seq.) and must be open and public so that any member of the public may attend and participate in the meetings. Commencing in March of 2020, Governor Newsom issued a series of executive orders aimed at preventing the spread of a respiratory disease that came to be known as the novel coronavirus, “COVID-19.” Among these were Executive Orders (“EO”) N-25-20, N-29-20, and N-35-20 (collectively, the “Brown Act Orders”) that waived the teleconferencing requirements of the Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to meet virtually.
On June 11, 2021, the Governor issued EO N-08-21 to begin winding down some of the prior measures that were adopted to respond to COVID-19. Notably, EO N-08-21 rescinded the Brown Act Orders, effective September 30, 2021. On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361, which became effective October 1, 2021, and amended the Brown Act to allow legislative bodies to meet virtually, without following the Brown Act’s standard teleconferencing rules, provided that the legislative body makes specific findings, which include the following:
1. A statewide state of emergency is currently in place;
2. State or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID-19; and/or
3. Meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
Continued compliance with AB 361 would require City Council to approve the action making the City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™ 99
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0037
Continued compliance with AB 361 would require City Council to approve the action making the required findings at least every 30 days.
Discussion:
All three findings under AB 361 can be made given the current circumstances. The Governor has proclaimed a state of emergency in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The state of emergency currently remains in effect.
Further, State officials, including the California Department of Public Health, have recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID-19, which are currently in place. Similarly, local officials, including the County Public Health Officer, have also recommended measures to promote social distancing in connection with COVID -19. In a recommendation dated September 28, 2021, the County Public Health Officer stated that “utilizing teleconferencing options for public meetings is an effective and recommended social distancing measure to facilitate participation in public affairs and encourage participants to protect themselves and others from the COVID-19 disease.” Finally, the City has determined that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. Accordingly, all of the above-referenced AB 361 findings currently exist.
If City Council thus desires to allow virtual meetings in order to both ensure the health and safety of the public, the legislative bodies of the City, and City staff, as well as continuity of government in allowing regularly-scheduled meetings to continue to occur without interruption, staff recommends City Council authorize virtual/teleconference meetings by making the findings set forth above.
Alternative:
If City Council does not make the findings pursuant to AB 361, the City would have to conduct its public meetings for City Council and other public boards and commissions in person and not have the option of conducting its meetings via teleconferencing.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
Attachments:
Link to Assembly Bill 361
Respectfully Submitted by: Susan Morrow, Interim City Clerk Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™100
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0036
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
APPROVAL OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF SPECIAL EVENT LONG-TERM AGREEMENT
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE COMMUNITY CHANUKAH
CELEBRATION AND THE GREAT AUTOS OF YESTERYEAR FOR THE ENDLESS SUMMER
CLASSIC CAR SHOW
(Community Resources Manager Lisa Nichols)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council approve the commencement of special event long-term agreement negotiations with the following organizations:
1. The Jewish Community Center for its Community Chanukah Celebration; and
2. The Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show.
Executive Summary:
The City Council approved implementation of the special event long-term agreement (LTA) policy pilot program for a three-year period commencing with the 2020 event calendar. Considering the cancellation of events in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council extended the policy’s pilot program by one year, ending with the 2023 event calendar. Staff received LTA applications from the Jewish Community Center for its Community Chanukah Celebration and the Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show. The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (Commission) reviewed the applications and recommends City Council approval to commence LTA agreement negotiations with the Jewish Community Center for its annual Community Chanukah Celebration, and the Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show.
Background:
On December 3, 2019, the Commission recommended that City Council approve the proposed special event LTA policy as a three-year pilot program, scheduled to begin with the 2020 event calendar. Additionally, the Commission recommended that City Council affirm and request that the Commission review and provide an update on the policy in two years, in advance of entering the pilot program’s third and final year. The City Council formally approved the Commission’s recommended policy and subsequent review at its January 14, 2020 meeting.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 6 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™101
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0036
Considering the cancellation of large gatherings and events in 2020, the Commission recommended that City Council extend the special event LTA policy pilot program by one year at its August 4, 2020 meeting. The City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation at its October 27, 2020 meeting. Therefore, the Commission is due to review the policy in 2022, instead of in 2021. The three -year policy pilot program would then be completed in 2023, at which time the Commission would recommend its permanent implementation with or without modifications.
At its January 4, 2022 meeting, the Commission reviewed LTA applications from the Jewish Community Center for its Community Chanukah Celebration and the Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show. Following its review, the Commission recommended the commencement of LTA negotiations with the Jewish Community Center for its annual Community Chanukah Celebration, and the Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show.
Past Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources
Advisory Commission and Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
December 3, 2019 Commission recommended Council approve the proposed special event LTA policy as a three-year pilot program
January 14, 2020 City Council formally approved the Commission’s recommended LTA policy
August 4, 2020 Commission recommended that City Council extend the special event LTA policy pilot program by one year
October 27, 2020 City Council approved the Commission’s recommendation extension
January 4, 2022 Commission reviewed LTA applications from the Jewish Community Center for its Community Chanukah Celebration; and the Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show
Discussion:
Staff began accepting LTA applications on September 17, 2020 for special events that met the eligibility requirements. In addition to completing the application, each event producer is required to submit a corresponding letter that addresses how the organization or event qualifies for each of the eligibility requirements.
To be eligible for a long-term agreement, an organization must satisfactorily meet at least three of the following qualifiers:
· The event qualifies as an Impact Level II or III (per the Impact Worksheet), and at least one of City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 6 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™102
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0036
· The event qualifies as an Impact Level II or III (per the Impact Worksheet), and at least one of the following:
o Have a combined total of 5,000 attendees; or
o Take place over two consecutive days (including setup and teardown). · The event has been held in Hermosa Beach for at least three consecutive years and can demonstrate a positive impact to the City including substitutive and measurable economic and community benefits;
· The event is produced by an organization that serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach’s coastal lifestyle, its residents, schools, and/or businesses; and · The event producer or organization can demonstrate how its programs (outside of those provided at the event) provide a positive impact to the City, including enhancements to quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community or the offering of recreational, cultural, social, and/or educational activities of interest to the community.
Staff received LTA applications from the Jewish Community Center for its Community Chanukah Celebration on November 4, 2021 and the Great Autos of Yesteryear for its Endless Summer Classic Car Show on November 29, 2021. As required by the LTA policy, the Commission reviewed the applications at its January 4, 2022 meeting and recommended City Council approve the commencement of special event long-term agreement negotiations with the Jewish Community Center and the Great Autos of Yesteryear. If City Council affirms the Commission’s recommendation to proceed, staff would begin negotiating with both organizations and return to City Council for formal adoption of the final agreements.
Included in Table 1 are the Jewish Community Center’s and the Great Autos of Yesteryear’s date requests for consideration.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 6 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™103
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0036
City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 6 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™104
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0036
Requested dates are not confirmed at this phase of review but would be part of the negotiation process if approved by the Council to proceed. Dates are provided here for informational purposes only and are consistent with each organization’s event dates held in previous years.
Event Information:
Community Chanukah Celebration
The Jewish Community Center’s annual Community Chanukah Celebration includes music, entertainment, the lighting of the Menorah, and family fun activities on Pier Plaza. Setup consists of the installation of the Menorah on Pier Plaza and Greenwood Park the Wednesday prior to the event.
The Menorahs stay in place through the indicated teardown dates. Additional event details and the organization’s justification for consideration of an LTA are included in its LTA application and supplemental letter included as Attachment 1.
Endless Summer Classic Car Show
The Great Autos of Yesteryear’s annual Endless Summer Classic Car Show includes the display of 48 classic cars throughout Pier Plaza. Additional event details and the organization’s justification for consideration of an LTA are included in its LTA application and supplemental letter included as Attachment 2.
General Plan Consistency:
This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:
Governance Element
Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.
Policy:
· 1.6 Long-term considerations. Prioritize decisions that provide long-term community benefit and discourage decisions that provide short-term community benefit but reduce long-term opportunities.
Parks and Open Space Element
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 6 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™105
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0036
Goal 3. Community parks and facilities encourage social activity and interaction.
Policies:
· 3.1 Community-friendly events. Encourage, permit, and support community group, nonprofit, or business organized events on City property that support physical activity, beach culture, and family-friendly social interactions. · 3.2 Social and cultural events. Design and program parks and open space to accommodate unique social and cultural events to foster connectedness and interaction.
· 3.3 Commercial use of facilities. Regulate and enforce commercial use of City parks and open spaces to ensure activities do not impact general use and enjoyment.
Goal 8. Special events at the beach are balanced to support community recreation and economic development without restricting coastal access or impacting the community.
Policies:
· 8.3 Community-focused events. Prioritize the approval of special events that enhance the sense of community, improve economic vitality, and foster · 8.4 Family-focused events. Prioritize events that appeal to a wide segment of community members.
Fiscal Impact:
At this time, there is no known fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. Special event fees are negotiated as part of each agreement, but those impacts are not known until the commencement of negotiations.
Attachments:
1. Jewish Community Center Long-term Agreement Application
2. Great Autos of Yesteryear Long-term Agreement Application
3. Link to December 3, 2019 Commission Report
4. Link to January 14, 2020 City Council Report
5. Link to August 4, 2020 Commission Report
6. Link to October 27, 2020 City Council Report
7. Link to January 4, 2022 Commission Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Nichols, Community Resources Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 6 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Endless Summer Classic Car Show
Long Term Agreement Application
By David Freedman
Show Coordinator
From the application:
In order for an organization to be eligible for consideration of a longterm agreement, its event(s) must satisfactorily meet at least three of the following:
The event(s) must qualify as an Impact Level II or III (per the Impact Worksheet found in the Special Event Application) event, AND at least one of the following:
□ Have a combined estimated total of 5,000 people in attendance; or □ The event must be at least two (2) consecutive days (including setup and teardown).
The show is determined to be an impact Level II.
We do not track the number of people in attendance because the car show is an open, free show but it is reasonable to estimate that during the course of the day-long show, we have over 5000 people entering the plaza and enjoying the beautiful classic cars.
□ Have held its event in Hermosa Beach for at least three consecutive years and can demonstrate a positive and differentiated impact to the city including substantive and measurable economic and community benefits;
115
The show has taken place for 21 consecutive years with the exception of 2020 due to COVID. Because the show occurs in early May, it brings pedestrians to Hermosa Beach and the Plaza during a time of the year that people would not regularly consider going to the beach, resulting in increased economic benefits. The long-term sponsors of the show, such as Hennessey’s Tavern and Baja Sharkeez has consistently stated that they far busier on the car show day, that the previous or following weekend.
□ The event must be produced by an organization that serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach’s coastal lifestyle, its residents, schools, and/or businesses;
The sponsoring classic car club, Great Autos of Yesteryear was founded in Los Angeles and convertibles and woodies have been a part of the beach culture for as long as there have been cars. On a sunny, cool, early May Saturday, there is nothing finer than enjoying a free and diverse classic car show while reveling in the delicious food and beautiful sites offered on the Plaza in Hermosa Beach.
□ The organization or event producer must be able to demonstrate how its programs (outside of those provided at the event) provide a positive impact to the City including enhancements to quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; or the offering of recreational, cultural, social, and/or educational activities of interest to the community.
The sponsoring classic car club, Great Autos of Yesteryear, is the largest LGBT classic car club in the world, yet many of our members, and participants in this show, are straight-identified, making this show and the numerous classic car shows and classic car cruise-ins sponsored by the club, a shining example of diversity, equality and friendship, all bound by the love of classic cars.
116
I personally have made lifelong friends through this show, straight and gay identified, many of them local to my hometown of Hermosa Beach and the South Bay, and consider my life enriched as a result. But it is the smiles on peoples’ faces as they enter the Plaza and see the classic cars, that is the ultimate sign of the importance and success of this show.
With Warmest Regards,
David Freedman
117
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0034
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 689 CLARK BUILDING RENOVATIONS
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
1. Approve the Clark Building Renovations final plans; and
2. Appropriate $747,033 from the Capital Improvement Fund to the CIP 689 project budget for the construction phase of the project.
Executive Summary:
Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 689 Clark Building Renovations provides for a full renovation of the Clark Building. The renovation includes remodeling of the kitchen area complete with new appliances; remodeling the restrooms and ballroom area; the addition of air conditioning, heating, and solar panels; acoustical improvements; new lighting throughout; a new sewer lateral; and full Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance for both the interior and exterior of the building.
Approval of the final design plans and appropriation of $747,033 from the Capital Improvement Fund would allow staff to move forward with the bidding process to complete construction of the project.
Background:
The Clark Building was constructed in 1936, adjoining Clark Stadium and the Lawn Bowling Facility.
The building houses a ballroom, two storage rooms, two restrooms, a small stage, and kitchen. The Clark Building is currently used for nonprofit, community, school, and civic organization meetings and gatherings, as well as private parties.
Over the years, the building has undergone various refurbishments. Most recently in 2008, City Council approved CIP 641, which included painting of the exterior of the building, replacement of windows and doors.
At its June 15, 2017 meeting, with the adoption of the FY 2017-18 budget, City Council approved CIP 689, with the purpose of remodeling the kitchen, making minor restroom upgrades, and painting the City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 5 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™118
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0034
689, with the purpose of remodeling the kitchen, making minor restroom upgrades, and painting the interior of the building. Under the original project scope, the bulk of the work was to be done by City maintenance crews with a budget of just $165,000. On June 12, 2018, with the adoption of the FY 2018-19 budget, City Council increased the project’s total budget to $475,100 to cover a larger scope of work including heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) system, new lighting in the ballroom space, and new ADA access to the building. The current project detail sheet for CIP 689 is included as Attachment 1.
At its July 3, 2018 meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission reviewed preliminary designs for the Clark Building kitchen. The Commission recommended the kitchen design be part of a facility-wide design to include the ballroom and restroom space and that the designs consider both existing and potential future uses of the facility. Additionally, the Commission recommended the involvement of subcommittees from both the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission and the Public Works Commission in design development.
On May 28, 2020, staff selected one of the City’s on-call consultants, The Albert Architect Group (Architect) to design the Clark Building Renovations. The cost of these design services is $63,000.
On September 14, 2020, the Community Resources Department performed community engagement through a survey and a virtual community forum. The survey was shared with neighboring residents, past facility users, and to the community through a social media campaign. Two surveys were developed, one for community and facility users and another for nearby residents. A virtual community forum was hosted on Monday, October 19, 2020, to discuss the scope of the project, evaluate facility user needs, gather community input, and understand the neighboring residents’ concerns. Information gathered through community engagement was used by staff, the subcommittees, and the architect to guide the design and specifically to determine the best kitchen type to accommodate the needs of the current and future building users.
On November 2, 2021, the architect presented the current design plans to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission and the Commission provided their approval. On November 17, 2021, the architect presented the current design plans to the Public Works Commission and the Commission also provided approval.
Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
June 15, 2017 City Council approves CIP 689 with the adoption of the FY 2017-18 budget
June 12, 2018 City Council increases the budget and scope for CIP 689 with the adoption of the FY 2018-19 budget City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™119
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0034
Meeting Date Description
June 15, 2017 City Council approves CIP 689 with the adoption of the FY 2017-18 budget
June 12, 2018 City Council increases the budget and scope for CIP 689 with the adoption of the FY 2018-19 budget
Analysis:
Included as Attachment 2 are the current design plans prepared by the project architect. These plans reflect design goals developed through the public engagement process and cover the following elements:
· Provides compliance with ADA standards for the building; · Designs an overall space including a main hall, kitchen, and restrooms that meet the building’s occupancy load of 170 seated and 240-assembly style;
· Includes elements that are complimentary to the building’s art deco architecture in the overall design;
· Increases energy efficiency for all appliances and lighting; · Provides a kitchen and hall space that is versatile for the needs of existing users, as well as potential future users;
· Includes audio visual (AV) equipment and acoustic improvements; · Provides storage areas compatible with the storage of all necessary equipment for the space including tables, chairs, AV equipment, a podium and stage; · Designs modern restroom facilities that are compatible with building usage; · Incorporates the addition of solar panels; and
· Develops a design that minimizes maintenance costs.
The funds requested in FY 2018-19 for the project were based on preliminary cost estimation, to be further developed during design. The FY 2018-19 construction cost estimate only included the original scope of work and did not include the increased scope or cost escalation for future years.
The additional items included in the project are complete electrical, plumbing, and mechanical upgrades; enhanced ADA access throughout the property; new trash enclosure; addition of an HVAC and solar systems; a new sewer lateral; new flooring; and an acoustical ceiling to improve the acoustics of the building.
The current construction cost estimate for the building is approximately $850,000 and includes all modern appliances and fixtures and cost escalation. The actual cost would depend on the bids received for construction. Actual bid prices would be presented to City Council for approval and award.
During the bidding and construction phase of the project, City staff and the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission subcommittee would review and update the Clark City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™120
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0034
Community Resources Advisory Commission subcommittee would review and update the Clark Building use policies to better suit the renovated space. The remodel is tentatively scheduled to be completed by 2023.
General Plan Consistency:
This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:
Sustainability Element
Goal 4. A leader in reducing energy consumption and renewable energy production.
Policies:
· 4.4 Municipal facilities. Utilize renewable energy sources at City facilities. · 4.5 Sustainable building standards. Use sustainable building checklists to minimize or eliminate waste and maximize recycling in building design, demolition, and construction activities.
Parks + Open Space Element
Goal 3. Community parks and facilities encourage social activity and interaction.
Policy:
· 3.6 Availability of City facilities. Consider the demand and availability of City facilities for general community use in the long-term lease and/or rental of City facilities.
Goal 4. Direct and accessible routes and connections to parks, recreational facilities, and open space are provided.
Policy:
· 4.4 ADA accessible park access. Install ADA and universally accessible amenities and equipment so that all parks, beach, and trail networks are accessible to all persons.
Infrastructure Element
Goal 1. Infrastructure systems are functional, safe, and well maintained.
Policy:
· 1.8 Minimize recurring repairs. Ensure that recurring repairs to City facilities are minimized by investing in low maintenance materials and performing preventive procedures where available.
Fiscal Impact:
Staff is requesting an additional $747,033 to support the construction phase of the project. The funds would cover the full construction costs, as well as the construction management and inspection City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™121
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0034
would cover the full construction costs, as well as the construction management and inspection services for the project. If approved, the total expected budget would be a total of $1,109,000 including: $850,000 for construction; $159,000 for construction management and inspection services; and $100,000 as a contingency for any unforeseen conditions or work. Any unused funds will be returned to the Capital Improvement Fund.
Table A. Project Funds
Fund Title Funds
Remaining Budget $361,967
Requesting Funds $747,033
Total Expected Budget $1,109,000
Table B. Project Expenses
Fund Title Expenses
Construction $850,000
Contingency $100,000
Construction Support $159,000
Total $1,109,000
Attachments:
1. CIP 689 Clark Renovations-Approved FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Project Detail Sheet
2. Clark Building Design - Presented to the Commissions
3. Clark Building Design - Received on January 19, 2022
4. Clark Building Design Presentation by the Albert Architect Group
5. Link to June 15, 2017 City Council Report
6. Link to June 12, 2018 City Council Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Jonathan Pascual, Assistant Engineer Concur: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer
Concur: Joseph SanClemente, Public Works Director
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™122
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS PRIORITY NO.: ACCOUNT NO.:
CATEGORY: Public Building and Ground Improvements 301-8689-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 689 Clark Building Renovations
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project proposes:
1. Design, Operational Review
2. Kitchen Remodel - including new commercial
appliances, sinks, countertops, lighting, tile,
flooring, doors and ADA upgrades.
3. Restrooms Remodel - including new flooring,
fixtures, stalls, sinks, toilets, lighting, and ADA
upgrades. Electrical, plumbing, sewer line
upgrades.
4. Install new HVAC.
5. Acoustic panels and new lighting throughout
ballroom area.
6. ADA upgrades to entrance building entrance
points.
JUSTIFICATION:
The kitchen has already been demolished in 2018 and the restrooms are very dated. Repairs to kitchen appliances and restroom fixtures are common due to numerous malfunctions.
STATUS:
Final Engineering Design
On-call design firm finalizing plans and specifications.
Construction to be completed in FY 21-22.
MAINTENANCE:
Additional janitorial services estimated at $1,420 annually.
COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS
Design (Conceptual/Construction
Docs/MEP/Operational Review) $50,300 301 Capital Improvement Funds $399,889 Construction $409,000
Construction Management $15,800
CURRENT REQUEST
301 Capital Improvement Funds $0
PROJECT TOTAL: $475,100 TOTAL FY 18-19 CIP FUNDING: $399,889 123
ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS
GA. GUAGE
GALV. GALVANIZED
G.I. GALVANIZED IRON
GL. GLASS
GR. GRADE
GYP.BD. GYPSUM BOARD
G.D. GARBAGE DISPOSAL
H.B. HOSE BIBB
HWD. HARDWOOD
HGT. HEIGHT
H.PT. HIGH POINT
HDR. HEADER
HTR. HEATER
H.W. HOT WATER
HORIZ. HORIZONTAL
H.C. HOLLOW CORE
I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER
INT. INTERIOR
INSUL. INSULATION
INV. INVERT
I.P.S. IRON PIPE SIZE
I.I.C. IMPACT INSULATION CLASS
LAV. LAVATORY
LGTH. LENGTH
LKR. LOCKER
MIN. MINIMUM
MAS. MASONRY
MAX. MAXIMUM
MECH. MECHANICAL
MEMB. MEMBRANE
MTL. METAL
M.H. MANHOLE
MISC. MISCELLANEOUS
M.O. MASONRY OPENING
M.R. MOISTURE RESISTANT
MFG. MANUFACTURER
N.I.C NOT IN CONTRACT
NO. NUMBER
NOM. NOMINAL
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
OBSC. OBSCURE
O.C. ON CENTER
O.D. OUTSIDE DIIAMETER
OFF. OFFICE
OPG. OPENING
OV. OVEN
OVFL. OVERFLOW
OPP. OPPOSITE
PL PROPERTY LINE
PART'N PARTITION
PLAS. PLASTER
PLYWD. PLYWOOD
PR. PAIR
P.L. PLASTIC LAMINATE
A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR
A.F.S. ABOVE FINISH SURFACE
BD BOARD
BLK BLOCK
BLKG BLOCKING
BM BEAM
BOT BOTTOM
BLDG BUILDING
BET BETWEEN
C.L. CENTER LINE
C.B. CATCH BASIN
CEM. CEMENT
CER. CERAMIC
C.I.P. CAST IRON PIPE
CLG. CEILING
CLO. CLOSET
CLR. CLEAR
C.O. CLEAN OUT
COL. COLUMN
COM. COMMON
CONC. CONCRETE
CONT. CONTINUOUS
C.W. COLD WATER
C.T. CERAMIC TILE
C.YD. CUBIC YARD
DET. DETAIL
D.F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN
D.D. DOOR DIMENSION
DIA. DIAMETER
DWG. DRAWING
D.S. DOWNSPOUT
D.W. DISHWASHER
DR. DOOR
DIM. DIMENSION
EA. EACH
ELEC. ELECTRICAL
ELEV. ELEVATION
ENCL. ENCLOSURE
EXH. EXHAUST
EXIST. EXISTING
EXP. EXPANSION
EXT. EXTERIOR
E.J. EXPANSION JOINT
F.D. FLOOR DRAIN
F.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET
FIN. FINISH
FLR. FLOOR
FLRG. FLOORING
F.GL. FIXED GLASS
F.S. FLOOR SINK
FLUOR. FLUORESCENT
F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE
F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY
F.O.S. FACE OF STUD
F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH
F.F. FINISH FLOOR
F.J. FLOOR JOIST
R. RISER
RAD. RADIUS
REINF. REINFORCING
RESIL. RESILIENT
RD. ROOF DRAIN
RM. ROOM
R.O. ROUGH OPENING
REF. REFRIGERATOR
REQ'D REQUIRED
S.C. SOLID CORE
SHT. SHEET
SIM. SIMILAR
SHTG. SHEATHING
SQ. SQUARE
STD. STANDARD
STL. STEEL
STRUCT. STRUCTURAL
S.S. STAINLESS STEEL
SUSP. SUSPENDED
SPECS. SPECIFICATIONS
STOR. STORAGE
S.T.C. SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS
S.F. SQUARE FOOT
SSD SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
TEL. TELEPHONE
TERR. TERRAZZO
T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE
T.O.C. TOP OF CURB
T.O.W. TOP OF WALL
TYP. TYPICAL
THRU. THROUGH
TEMP. TEMPERED
T.O.P. TOP OF PARAPET
T. TREAD
T.O.PL TOP OF PLATE
U URINAL
U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
VERT. VERTICAL
VEST. VESTIBULE
V.C.T. VINYLE COMPOSITION TILE
VIF VERIFY IN FEILD
W/ WITH
WAINS. WAINSCOT
W.C. WATER CLOSET
WD. WOOD
WH WATER HEATER
WP. WATERPROOF
DEMOLISH
EXISTING
NEW
PHASING LEGEND
SLOPE ARROWS
SLOPE ARROWS
ELEVATION CALLOUTS
GRID BUBBLE
BUILDING ELEVATION
SHEET NUMBER
INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBER
BUILDING SECTION
SHEET NUMBER
WALL SECTION
SHEET NEUMBER
DETAIL NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
DETAIL TICK
MATCHLINE
BREAK LINE
SLOPE
0:12
T.O.WALL
T.O.WALL
X
1 A0.0
1 A0.0
1 1
A0.0
1 A0.0
1 A0.0
1 ROOM FINISH TAG
SUSMP AREA
ALLOCATION
POINT ELEVATION
STEP IN SLAB
FACADE ELEVATION
MARKER
WALL TYPE
REVISION CALLOUT
DOOR CALLOUT
WINDOW CALLOUT
ROOM NUMBER
CEILING HEIGHT
NORTH ARROW
KEYNOTES
CEILING HGT.
ROOM NAME
FLR. MATERIAL
SUSMP
+00.00'
+0'-0"
+0"
X X X
0 D-000
W-000
000
ROOM NAME
0'-0"
RENOVATION OF THE CLARK BUILDING CONSISTING OF ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES, NEW KITCHEN, RENOVATED RESTROOMS, AND MATERIAL UPGRADES THROUGHOUT.
NO CHANGE TO THE BUILDING STRUCTURE MEP UPGRADES PER SEPERATE PERMIT.
SITE ADDRESS: CLARK BUILDING
861 VALLEY DRIVE,
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
PROPERTY INFORMATION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ZONING INFORMATION
UNDERLYING ZONE: OPEN SPACE
ZONING INFORMATION: COSTAL ZONE
OWNER
COMPANY: CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CONTACT: JONATHAN PASCUAL
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 310.318.0222
ADDRESS: 1315 VALLEY DRIVE,
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
COMPANY: A & N DESIGN GROUP INC.
CONTACT: ARASH NAZARI, PE
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 818.288.4361
ADDRESS: 21550 OXNARD STREET #300
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367
MEP ENGINEER
ARCHITECT
COMPANY: THE ALBERT GROUP ARCHITECTS
ARCHITAG LLP
CONTACT: BRITTANY EDWARDS
EMAIL: [email protected]
TELEPHONE: 310.820.8863 x205
ADDRESS: 2032 STONER AVE, STUDIO A
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
1. THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES, OR ANY OTHER ACCESSORIES
THEREOF, ARE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE FOR USE BY THE OWNER AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES ON THE DESIGNATED PROPERTY ONLY.
2. IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES OCCUR IN THE DRAWINGS OF DIFFERENT DISCIPLINES, CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION.
3. THESE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY ARE NOT EXHAUSTIVELY DETAILED OR FULLY SPECIFIED. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO SELECT, VERIFY, RESOLVE, AND INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT.
4. WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN STRUCTURAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, CONSULT ARCHITECT.
5. STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER FOR STRUCTURAL CONFORMANCE TO THE APPROVED PLANS.
6. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE.
7. ALL ADDENDA, CHANGE ORDERS, BULLETINS, AND NOTICES, IF ANY ISSUED LATER, SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE WORK.
8. IN THE EVENT THERE ARE FOUND DISCREPANCIES OR AMBIGUITIES IN OR OMISSIONS
FROM THE DRAWINGS, OR SHOULD THERE BE DOUBT AS TO THEIR MEANING OR
INTENT, THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN CLARIFICATION.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTINUOUS CLEANUP OF THE SITE
AND OF ALL DEBRIS, WHETHER CREATED BY HIS WORK, OR BY THE FAILURE OF HIS SUBCONTRACTORS TO CLEAN UP AFTER THEIR WORK.
10. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN AND PROPERTY PROTECTION BARRICADES AND/OR CANOPIES
REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES , OR AS NECESSARY FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. AS A PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR A PROTECTION FENCE OR CANOPY ON OR OVER ANY STREET OR PUBLIC SPACE.
11. TYPICAL DETAILS SHALL APPLY WHERE NO SPECIFIC DETAILS OR SECTIONS ARE GIVEN.
12. ALL DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALE. NOTE THAT DIMENSIONS ARE TO
FACE WALL, UNLESS OBVIOUSLY SHOWN, OR MARKED CENTERLINE OF WALL OR COLUMN. CONTRACTOROF SHALL NOT SCALE FROM THE DRAWINGS.
13. ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NECESSITATED BY FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT.
14. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE BY EACH SUBCONTRACTOR BEFORE THAT SUBCONTRACTOR BEGINS WORK.
ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE
ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS.
15. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS OF THE OCCUPATION SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT.
16. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BY THE LOCAL BUILDING INSPECTOR FOR ALL CONCEALED WORK BEFORE CLOSING UP.
17. ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE FLASHED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM WATERPROOF. ALL FLASHING, COUNTERFLASHING AND
COPING WHEN OF METAL, SHALL MEET THE GAUGES SPECIFIED, BUT NO LESS THAN 24 GA. GALVANIZED.
18. PROVIDE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE OVER ALL EXTERIOR BUILDING WALLS BELOW GRADE. CARRY WATERPROOF MEMBRANE 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. INSTALL PROTECTION BOARD PRIOR TO BACKFILLING.
19. NO TRENCHES OR EXCAVATIONS 5' OR MORE IN DEPTH INTO WHICH A PERSON IS
REQUIRED TO DESCEND SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT ENGINEERED SHORING PLANS. IT SHALL BE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE SUCH PLANS AND OBTAIN REQUIREDTHE APPROVALS.
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
As indicated
2017
A0.00
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
TITLE SHEET
3/31/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
CLARK COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRESS SET
861 VALLEY DRIVE
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
PROJECT SYMBOLS
GENERAL
A0.00 TITLE SHEET
A0.02 GENERAL NOTES
A0.03 GENERAL NOTES
A0.10 CODE COMPLIANCE
SHEET LIST
ARCHITECTURAL
A1.00 SITE PLAN
A1.10 DEMO PLAN
A2.00 PROPOSED PLAN
A2.01 PROPOSED RCP
A2.10 ENLARGED RAMPS
A2.11 ENLARGED RESTROOMS AND KITCHEN
A3.00 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.10 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS- BALLROOM
A3.11 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS- KITCHEN
A3.12 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS- RESTROOM
A3.13 MATERIALS
A3.14 RENDERING
A3.15 RENDERING
A3.16 RENDERING
A3.17 RENDERING
A7.00 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES
ACC.1 ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS
ACC.2 ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS
AD.10 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS- WALLS
AD.20 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS- FOUNDATION
AD.50 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS- DOORS
AD.70 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS- STAIRS
AD.80 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS- FINISHES
PROJECT DATA DIRECTORY
AREA MAP
PROJECT SITE
PROJECT SITE
ZONING MAP
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
124
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE:
2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 24 PART 11
2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
TOTAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY: 200 PERSONS
OCCUPANCY TYPE: ASSEMBLY A-3
WATER CLOSETS MALE: 1: 1-100 MALE: 1 MALE: 2 MALE: 2 MALE: 1 FEMALE: 3: 51-100 FEMALE: 3 FEMALE: 3 FEMALE: 3 FEMALE: 1
FIXTURE TYPE CALCULATION FIXTURE COUNT FIXTURE COUNT FIXTURE COUNT ADA FIXTURES
REQUIRED EXISTING PROVIDED PROVIDED
1. FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS PER CPC 2019 TABLE 422.1
2. 201 PERSONS ASSUMED 50% GENDER SPLIT. FOR THE PERPOSES OF THIS CALCULATION THERE ARE 100 MALES AND 100 FEMALES.
URINALS 1: 1-100 1 2 2 1
LAVATORIES MALE: 1: 1-200 MALE: 1 MALE: 1 MALE: 2 MALE: 1 FEMALE: 1: 1-100 FEMALE: 1 FEMALE: 2 FEMALE: 3 FEMALE: 2 MAIN BALLROOM 2,938 SF ASSEMBLY (UNCONCENTRATED) 15 NET 195 PERSONS ROOM AREA OCCUPANCY TYPE FLOOR AREA CALC. OCCUPANCY
KITCHEN 391 SF KITCHEN 200 SF GROSS 2 PERSONS
MEN'S RESTROOM 171 SF N/A N/A N/A
WONEN'S RESTROOM 188 SF N/A N/A N/A
STORAGE 1 145 SF ACCESSORY STORAGE 300 SF GROSS 1 PERSON STORAGE 2 199 SF ACCESSORY STORAGE 300 SF GROSS 1 PERSON STORAGE 3 84 SF ACCESSORY STORAGE 300 SF GROSS 1 PERSON TOTAL 3,366 SF 200 PERSONS
1. PER TABLE 1004.1.2 CBC 2016
1 1
BALLROOM
100
200 SF
STORAGE 1
105
180 SF
STORAGE 2
104
213 SF
WOMEN'S
RESTROOM
103
182 SF
MEN'S
RESTROOM
102
372 SF
KITCHEN
101
98 SF
STORAGE 3
106
67 44"
44"
44"
67 67
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
As indicated
2017
A0.10
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
CODE COMPLIANCE
01/08/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
CODE SUMMARY
PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS
OCCUPANCY CALCULATIONS
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
125
200 SF
STORAGE 1
213 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
182 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
3,366 SF
BALLROOM
372 SF
KITCHEN
98 SF
STORAGE 3
W
S
S
VALLEY DRIVE
(E) SIDEWALK
(E) PARKING
(E) ACCESSIBLE
PARKING
(E) ACCESSIBLE
PARKING
(E) ACCESSIBLE
PARKING
(E) ACCESSIBLE
PARKING
(E) PARKING
(E) PARKING
(E) BASEBALL
FEILD
(E) LAWN
BOWLING FEILD
CLARK BUILDING
COMMUNTY CENTER
BUILDING TOTAL = 5,119 SF
EXTENT OF ARCHITECTURAL SCOPE
180 SF
STORAGE 2
N
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
3/16" = 1'-0"
2017
A1.00
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
SITE PLAN
7/14/2020 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
SITE PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" 1
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
126
1 XA4.00
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
5 5
4 4
1 1
3 3
2 2
A3.01
1 1 A3.00
A3.01
2 A3.00 2
2 XA4.00
2 XA4.00
BALLROOM
STORAGE 1
KITCHEN
STORAGE 2
D01
D02
D03
D13
D14
D04
D04
D04
D05
D05
D06
D06
D06
D06
D07
D08
D08
D08
D08
D08 D08 D08 D08 D08
D08 D09
D10 D10 D10
D11
D12
D11
D15
D16
D08
A3.10
2 1
4 3
9' - 9 1/2" V.I.F. 7' - 0"
1 A3.14
A3.16
1 1. PROTECT AND PRESERVE EXISTING TREE AT SOUTH-EAST
CORNER OF BUILDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
2. PRESSURE WASH EXTEROR AND INTERIOR OF BUILDING
BEFORE PAINTING OR APLICATION OF NEW MATERIAL.
DEMO NOTES
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
As indicated
2017
A1.10
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
DEMO PLAN
8/18/2020 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
EXISTING / DEMO PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" 1
DEMO KEYNOTES
D01 REMOVE EXISTING FIREPLACE, FLUE, AND BRICK FACADE.
D02 REMOVE DRYWALL ON CEILING BETWEEN STRUCTURAL BAYSPROTECT BEAMS F STRUCTURAL BAYS, LEAVE FRAMING SYSTEM INTACT
D03 REMOVE EXISTING INTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES THROUGHOUT
D04 DEMOLISH PORTION OF CONCRETE WALL TO CREATE A SURFACE
FLUSH WITH THE SURROUNDING GRADE
D05 REMOVE STALL PARTITIONS
D06 REMOVE EXISTING WALL (OR PORTION OF WALL)- PROTECT
SURROUNDING WALL SURFACES - PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED
D07 REMOVE VANITY COUNTER AND SINK
D08 REMOVE EXISTING DOOR- PATCH AND REPAIR AS NEEDED
D09 REMOVE SINK
D10 REMOVE TOILET / URINAL
D11 DEMOLISH EXISTING CONCRETE LANDING AND STAIRS
D12 DEMOLISH EXISTING RAMP AND HANDRAILS
D13 PULL UP EXISTING FLOORING THROUGHOUT
D14 REMOVE EXISTING WATER HEATER- SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR
DEATILS AND REPLACEMENT
D15 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE
D16 REMOVE EXISTING STAIR - PORTION PER PROPOSED PLAN
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
127
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
5 5
4 4
1 1
3 3
2 2
A3.01
1 1 A3.00
A2.11
2 A3.00 2
A3.12
4 5
2 3
A3.12
8 9
6 7
200 SF
STORAGE 1
213 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
182 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
3,366 SF
BALLROOM
601 501 401 101
602
372 SF
KITCHEN
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
(EXISTING) (EXISTING)
98 SF
STORAGE 3
4' - 0"
-0'-1/4"
1% SLOPE
8' - 7"
W
S
180 SF
STORAGE 2
A2.11
1 5' - 4"
7' - 0"
02 09
11 14
14 12
01 01
01 01
01 02
03 03
04 09
05 06
07 07
07 08
08 0'-0"
1% SLOPE 1% SLOPE
1% SLOPE
1% SLOPE
1% SLOPE
1% SLOPE
2 A3.11
6 3
5 A3.11 4
14' - 8 1/2" 14' - 9" 14' - 9" 14' - 9"
-1' - 6"
3' - 7" 5' - 0"
6' - 0" MIN. 16' - 8" V.I.F.
44" MIN.
3' - 10"
-0'-1/4"
-0'-1/4"
1% SLOPE
1% SLOPE 1% SLOPE
1' - 11" 3' - 3 1/2" 10' - 3 1/2" 10' - 0 1/2" 3' - 6"
7' - 5 1/2"
6' - 3 1/2" 7' - 3 1/2"
5' - 0"
5' - 4 1/2" 5' - 4 1/2" 2' - 10"
6' - 6 1/2"
6' - 7 1/2" 6' - 4 1/2" 13' - 5 1/2" 7' - 3 1/2"
6' - 4" V.I.F.
A3.10
2 1
4 3
A 4 0
A 6 0
A 6 0
A 4 0
A 4 0
A 4 0
A 4 0
A 6 0
A 4 0
A 4 0
A 4 0
A 6 0
44" MIN.
3' - 10"
1' - 11" 1' - 0"
1' - 0" 1' - 0"
1' - 0" 1' - 0"
1' - 11" 1' - 0" 1' - 0" 1' - 11"
1' - 0" 1' - 11"
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
1' - 0"1' - 0"
60" MIN.
6' - 7"
0' - 0" -0'-1/4" 1' - 6"
2' - 0"
2' - 1"
18' - 9" V.I.F. 5' - 8"
1' - 0"1' - 0" 1' - 0"
60" MIN.
5' - 5"
1' - 0" 18' - 9" V.I.F. 1' - 0" 6' - 0"
1' - 0" 1' - 0"
1' - 0"
1' - 6"
5' - 0" 17' - 2" V.I.F.
1' - 0"1' - 0"
V.I.F.
1' - 7 1/2" 6' - 6"
301
102
103
503
402
502
201
(EXISTING) (EXISTING) (EXISTING) (EXISTING)
-0'-1/4" 0'-0"
11' - 9"
3' - 9" 7' - 6"
0' - 0"
4' - 10"
8.3% SLOPE
MAX.
8.3% SLOPE
MAX.
8.3% SLOPE MAX.
8.3% SLOPE MAX.
8.3% SLOPE
MAX.
8.3% SLOPE
MAX.
8.3% SLOPE
MAX.
N
1 A3.14
A3.16
1 A2.10
1 -0'-1"
A2.10
3 A2.10
5 A2.10
2 A2.10
4 001
002
003
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
1/4" = 1'-0"
2017
A2.00
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PROPOSED PLAN
8/18/2020 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
PROPOSED PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
PLAN KEYNOTES
01 ACCESSIBLE CONCRETE RAMP AND METAL HANDRAIL, SEE DETAILS 02 CONCRETE OVERPOUR TO BE PROVIDED FOR AN ACCESSIBLE
TRANSITION @ ENTRY DOOR- 2% SLOPE MAX. FOR DRAINAGE
03 CONCRETE WALKWAY AND METAL HANDRAIL, SEE ENLARGED PLANS
AND DETAILS
04 CONCRETE STAIRS AND METAL HANDRAIL, SEE ENLARGED PLANS AND
DETAILS
05 FILL EXISTING STAIR W/ CONCRETE FOR A FLUSH FINISHED SURFACE 06 PROVIDE NEW RETAINING WALL TO MATCH EXISTING FOR
CONTINUOUS STRUCTURE
07 NEW COCRETE WALKWAY ON GRADE
08 CONCRETE LANDING PER ENLARGED PLANS AND DETAILS- ALIGN
LANDING W/ ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE FOR ACCESSIBLE
TRANSITION
09 CONCRETE STAIRS AND METAL HANDRAIL, SEE ENLARGED PLANS AND DETAILS; V.I.F. IF EXISTING STAIRS CAN BE UTILIZED W/ OVERPOUR TO ADJUST FOR OVERPOUR @ LANDING
11 WATER HEATER CLOSET- SEE MEP DRAWIGNS FOR DETAILS
12 ATTIC ACCESS PULL DOWN LADDER- VERIFY EXACT LOCATION IN FEILD
14 NEW RESTROOM LAYOUT AND FIXTURES PER ENLARGED PLAN
B01 ARMSTRONG FLORING LUXE PLANK; GROVELAND NATURAL OR
APPROVED EQ.
B02 CERTAINTEED ECOPHON SOLO PANEL, WHITE- SEE RCP
B04 MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE SYSTEM, ECOVEIL SHEER, METAL- OR APPROVED EQ.
B05 PAINT- WHITE OR APPROVED EQ.
B06 ACCENT PAINT- LIGHT GREEN OR APPROVED EQ.
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
128
1 XA4.00
1 XA4.00
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
E
E
F
F
5 5
4 4
1 1
3 3
2 2
A3.01
1 1 A3.00
A3.01
2 A3.00 2
2 XA4.00
2 XA4.00
200 SF
STORAGE 1
3,366 SF
BALLROOM
213 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM 182 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
372 SF
KITCHEN
4' - 0"
3' - 6"
4' - 0"
180 SF
STORAGE 2
3' - 6" 3' - 6" 3' - 6"
3' - 6"3' - 6"
4' - 7" 4' - 0"
3' - 6"
EQ EQ EQ 3' - 0" 3' - 6"
98 SF
STORAGE 3
EQ EQ
4' - 0" 4' - 0"
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
CL
OF SINK
CL
OF SINK
1' - 0"
CL
OF SINK
CL
OF SINK
1' - 0"
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
CL
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
EQEQ
EQ EQ
CL
OF SINK
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
2' - 0" 2' - 0"
C01
C03 C03 C03
C03
C03
C02
C02
C08
C08 C08
C08
EQ EQ
C07
C07
C07
C07
C10
C08
C08
C08
C08
C08
C10
C08
C08
C09
C09
C09 C09
C09 C09
C09
CL
OF SINK
C07
EQ EQ1' - 6" 1' - 6" EQ EQ EQ
C14
C14
CL
OF COUNTER
BELOW
1 A3.14
43' - 5"
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
1/4" = 1'-0"
2017
A2.01
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PROPOSED RCP
09/23/20 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
PROPOSED RCP 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
RCP KEYNOTES
C01 PATCH EXISTING DRYWALL CEILING- HT. TO MATCH EXISTING- PAINTED WHITE
C02 DRYWALL SOFFIT @ 1'-0" BELOW MAIN CEILING
C03 EXISTING DRYWALL CEILING TO REMAIN
C07 2" RECESSED CAN LED LIGHT FIXTURE- 4000K
C08 4" RECESSED CAN LED LIGHT FIXTURE- 4000K
C09 6" RECESSED CAN LED LIGHT FIXTURE- 3000K, DIMMABLE
C10 EXHAUST FAN PER MECH. DRAWINGS- VENTS TO BE DUCTED TO THE
EXTERIOR PER MECHANICAL
C14 LUMENWERX 2" VOILA PENDANT, 9" HT FIXTURE- 3500K
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
129
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
4' - 0"
8.3% SLOPE MAX.
5' - 0" 1' - 0"
5' - 0" 1' - 0"
RAMP
18' - 9" V.I.F. 7' - 0" LANDING
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
ALIGN PROPOSED
CONCRETE LANDING W/
EXISTING PARKING LOT
-0' - 1"
5' - 0"
6' - 0" LANDING
4' - 0" LANDING
V.I.F.
8.3% SLOPE
MAX.
-0' - 3/4"
5' - 0" LANDING
RAMP
1' - 7 1/2" V.I.F. 6' - 6" LANDING
1' - 0"
8.3% SLOPE MAX.
1' - 6"
-1' - 6"
1' - 0"1' - 0" 5' - 0" LANDING
RAMP
17' - 2" V.I.F.
5' - 0"
5' - 4"
1% SLOPE
44" MIN.
3' - 10"
44" MIN.
3' - 10"
5' - 0" LANDING
6' - 0" LANDING
5' - 0" LANDING
V.I.F.
V.I.F.
6' - 0" LANDING
5' - 0" LANDING
1' - 0"1' - 0"
RAMP
4' - 3" V.I.F. 5' - 0" LANDING
5' - 0" LANDING
5' - 0" LANDING
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
RAMP
14' - 6" V.I.F. 6' - 6" LANDING
8.3% SLOPE MAX.
8.3% SLOPE MAX.
-1' - 6"
-0' - 3 1/2"
V.I.F.
V.I.F.
5' - 0" LANDING
5' - 0" LANDING
4' - 0"
8.3% SLOPE MAX.
1' - 0"
RAMP
16' - 8" V.I.F. 1' - 0"
1' - 0" 1' - 0"
6' - 0" LANDING
4' - 0" LANDING
-1' - 6" -0' - 3 1/2"
V.I.F. V.I.F.
ALIGN PROPOSED
CONCRETE LANDING W/
EXISTING PARKING LOT
5' - 0" LANDING
5' - 0" LANDING
6' - 0" LANDING
4' - 0" LANDING 1' - 0"
RAMP
18' - 9" V.I.F. 1' - 0"
1' - 0"
2' - 1"
5' - 8"
4' - 0" 8.3% SLOPE MAX.
- 0' - 1/4"
11' - 1 1/2"
- 1' - 6"
V.I.F.
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
1/2" = 1'-0"
2017
A2.10
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
ENLARGED RAMPS
07/21/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
SCALE:
ENLARGED RAMP 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 1
SCALE:
ENLARGED RAMP 2 1/2" = 1'-0" 3
SCALE:
ENLARGED RAMP 3 1/2" = 1'-0" 5
SCALE:
ENLARGED RAMP 4 1/2" = 1'-0" 2
SCALE:
ENLARGED RAMP 5 1/2" = 1'-0" 4
130
A3.12
4 5
2 3
A3.12
8 9
6 7
213 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
182 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
2' - 0" MIN. 2' - 0" 2' - 0"
15" MIN. 15" MIN. 15" MIN. 15" MIN.
5' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
1' - 6" MIN.
ø 5' - 0"
1' - 9"
4' - 0"
2' MIN.
5' - 6"
1' - 10"
5' - 0" MIN. 5' - 0" MIN.
5' - 0"
5' - 0" MIN.
2' - 0" MIN. 2' - 0" 1' - 0"
15" MIN. 15" MIN. 15" MIN. 15" MIN.
2' - 6" MIN.
15" MIN.
3' - 0"
4' - 10"
8' - 2 1/2" V.I.F.
18"
24" 12"
12" 42"
59" CL.
4' - 0" MIN.
6' - 4 1/2" V.I.F.
18"
59" CL. 36"
2' - 0" MIN.
6' - 0"
42" 12"
24" 12"
5' - 0" MIN.
2' MIN.
2' MIN.
ø 5' - 0"
2' - 6" 2' - 6"
60" MIN.
A3.12
12 11
10 13
R01
R01
R01
R01
R01
R02
R02
R03
R03
R03
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
R04
R04
R04
R04
R04
R05
R05
R06
R06
R05 R06
R05
R06
R05
R06
R07
R07
R08
R08
R08
R11 R08
R12
R09
R10
0' - 10 1/2"
R13
R07
R13
R13
2' - 0" 4' - 1" 13' - 1" 5' - 0" 2' - 0"
2' - 0" 4' - 2" 2' - 6" 3' - 0"
2' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 1' - 6" 2' - 0"
8' - 0" 0' - 6"
2' - 0" 6' - 1"
7' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
5' - 0"
KITCHEN
STORAGE 3
2 A3.11
6 3
5 A3.11 4
8' - 0"
7' - 0" V.I.F. WINDOW PLACEMENT
6' - 0"
ALIGN W/ SOFIT ABOVE
2' - 1"
3' - 0" 2' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 1"
2' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0"
3' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0"
K01
K03
K04
K05
K06
K11
K12
K12
K02
2' - 6" 3' - 0"
K10
K08
K13
2' - 6"
2' - 0" 4' - 5"
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
1/2" = 1'-0"
2017
A2.11
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
ENLARGED
RESTROOMS AND
KITCHEN
8/18/2020 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
ENGLARGED RESTROOM PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0" 2
SCALE:
ENLARGED KITCHEN PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0" 1
RESTROOM KEYNOTES
R01 WATER CLOSET, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 2|ACC.3 "ULTRA LOW FLUSH" TYPE TOILET: MAX 1.28 GAL/FLUSH (TOTO CT705ULN(G) OR APPROVED EQ.) 29" DEEP MAX, RECESSED TOTO ECOPOWER CONCEALED FLUSH
VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL
R02 URINAL, "ULTRA HIGH EFFICIENCY" TYPE URINAL: MAX. 0.125 GAL/FLUSH (TOTO UT445U(V) W/ CONCEALED TOTO ECOPOWER FLUSH VALVE - ADA COMPLIANT, OR APPROVED EQ.)
R03 COUNTERTOP, ADA COMPLIANT, MIN 27" KNEE CLR A.F.F., CAESARSTONE- NOBLE GREY OR APPROVED EQ.
R04 UNDERMOUNT LAVATORY BASIN, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 2|ACC.2, KOHLER VERTICYL MODEL NO. K-2882-0, WHITE OR APPROVED EQ R05 LAVATORY FAUCET, AUTOMATIC, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 7|ACC.1, BRADLEY VERGE ZEN SERIES S53-3700 OR APPROVED EQ.
R06 SOAP DISPENSER, DECK MOUNTED, AUTOMATIC, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 7|ACC.1, BRADLEY VERGE ZEN SERIES 6-3700 OR APPROVED EQ.
R07 HAND DRYER, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 7,8|ACC.1, TOTO CLEAN DRY HIGH SPEED HAND DRYER HDR111#SS
R08 HANDICAP GRAB BAR, ICC 11B COMPLIANT, SEE 3,5|ACC.2 R09 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL, TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES PARTITION-MOUNTED B-357 OR APPROVED EQ.
R10 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL, TOILET TISSUE
DISPENSER, ADA COMPLIANT- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES RECESSED B-3574 OR APPROVED EQ.
R11 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER, ADA
COMPLIANT- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES RECESSED B-34745 OR
APPROVED EQ.
R12 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES RECESSED B-3474 OR APPROVED EQ.
R13 FRAMELESS MIRROR; SIZE AND HEIGHT PER INTERIOR ELEVATIONS R20 FLOOR TILE, PORCELANOSA, CONCRETE GREY NATURE 12X24 OR APPROVED EQ.
R21 WALL TILE, ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE, BLANCO IN MATTE OR APPROED EQ.
R22 WALL TILE, ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE, GRIS IN GLOSS OR APPROED EQ.
R23 ARMTRONG LUX PLANK W/ RIGID CORE- GROVELAND NATURAL; OR APPROVED EQ.
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
KITCHEN KEYNOTES.
K01 30" GAS RANGE, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K02 30"x18" HOOD, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K03 24" WIDE UNDERCOUNTER MICROWAVE, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING DRAWERMICRO OVEN 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K04 30" WARMING DRAWER, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K05 24"x24" UNDERCOUNTER DISHWASHER, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 524 MODEL OR APPROVED EQ.
K06 30" ELECTRIC OVEN, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES VSOE350 OR APPROVED EQ.
K08 STAINLESS STEEL UNDER-MOUNT SINGLE BOWL KITCHEN SINK W/ GRABAGE DISPOSAL, KOHLER VAULT K-3821-3 OR APPROVED EQ.
K10 24"x24" PENAL-WARE 1630 SERIES STAINLESS STEEL MOP SINK OR APPROVED EQ.
K11 30" WIDE ADA COMPLIANT WORK SPACE W/ NO BASE CABINET FOR KNEE & TOE CLEARANCE.
K12 36" HIGH, STONE TOP COUNTER, TYP. @ KITCHEN, CAESARSTONE EMPIRA WHITE OR APPOVED EQ.
K13 KOHLER PURIST K-24982 FAUCET, VIBRANT STAINLESS- OR APPROVED EQ.
K14 FLOOR TILE, PORCELANOSA, CONCRETE GREY NATURE 12X24 OR APPROVED EQ.
K15 WALL TILE, ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE, BLANCO IN MATTE OR APPROED EQ.
K17 ARMTRONG LUX PLANK W/ RIGID CORE- GROVELAND NATURAL; OR APPROVED EQ.
K18 STONE COUNTERTOP WATERFALL OVER EDGE
K19 MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE SYSTEM, ECOVEIL SHEER, METAL- OR APPROVED EQ.; SEE INTERIOR ELEVATION FOR WALL LOCATION
K20 KARMAN, FORTE, ULTRA MATTE ACRYLIC, COLOR METALIC SILVER OR APPROVED EQ.
131
(E) BALLROOM FF
5 4 3 2 1
ADJACENT GRADE
(E) LAWN
BOWLING
FIELD
1' - 10" 1' - 10" 7' - 10" 9"
E01 E01 E01 E02E02
E03
E03
E06 E06 E04 E06 E06
E05
E07
E07
E08
(E) BALLROOM FF
1 2 3 4 5
ADJACENT GRADE
(E) LAWN
BOWLING
FIELD
(E) RETAINING
WALL
E03 E03
E07
E01 E02 E01
E04
E05
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
1/4" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.00
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
3/31/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
EAST FRONT ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
SCALE: WEST REAR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 2
ELEVATION KEYNOTES
E01 CONCRETE RAMP, SEE PLANS
E02 CONCRETE STAIRS, SEE PLANS
E03 POWDER COATED BLACK METAL RAILING
E04 POWERWASH & REPAINT EXTERIOR- COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PER
ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL
E05 REPLACE EXISTING DOOR PER SCHEDULE
E06 STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOORS TO REMAIN
E07 CONCRETE OVERPOUR TO BE PROVIDED FOR AN ACCESSIBLE
TRANSITION @ ENTRY DOOR- 2% SLOPE MAX. FOR DRAINAGE
E08 FRAMED COLUMN W/ STUCCO FINISH- PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING
COLUMNS
E09 REPLACE EXISTING WINDOW PER SCHEDULE
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
132
(E) BALLROOM FF
F E D C B A
ADJACENT GRADE
E06 E06 E06 E06 E06
E01
E01
E03
E03
E04
E07
(E) BALLROOM FF
A B C D E F
ADJACENT GRADE
1' - 10" 1' - 10" 7' - 10" 9"
E09 E09 E04 E09 E09
E08
E03 E03
E01 E01
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
1/4" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.01
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
3/31/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
SCALE:
SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 2
ELEVATION KEYNOTES
E01 CONCRETE RAMP, SEE PLANS
E02 CONCRETE STAIRS, SEE PLANS
E03 POWDER COATED BLACK METAL RAILING
E04 POWERWASH & REPAINT EXTERIOR- COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PER
ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL
E05 REPLACE EXISTING DOOR PER SCHEDULE
E06 STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOORS TO REMAIN
E07 CONCRETE OVERPOUR TO BE PROVIDED FOR AN ACCESSIBLE
TRANSITION @ ENTRY DOOR- 2% SLOPE MAX. FOR DRAINAGE
E08 FRAMED COLUMN W/ STUCCO FINISH- PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING
COLUMNS
E09 REPLACE EXISTING WINDOW PER SCHEDULE
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
133
(E) LAWN
BOWLING
FIELD
1' - 10" 1' - 10" 9"
E01 E01 E01 E02E02
E03
E03
E06 E06 E04 E06 E06
E05
E07
E07
E08
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
1/4" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.14
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
RENDERING
06/23/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
SCALE:
EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
RAILINGMETAL;
POWDER COATED BLACK
WALLPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
JACK AND THE BEANSTALK
WALLPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
DESERT GREEN
WALLPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
CEDAR GROVE
ELEVATION KEYNOTES
E01 CONCRETE RAMP, SEE PLANS
E02 CONCRETE STAIRS, SEE PLANS
E03 POWDER COATED BLACK METAL RAILING
E04 POWERWASH & REPAINT EXTERIOR- COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PER
ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL
E05 REPLACE EXISTING DOOR PER SCHEDULE
E06 STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOORS TO REMAIN
E07 CONCRETE OVERPOUR TO BE PROVIDED FOR AN ACCESSIBLE
TRANSITION @ ENTRY DOOR- 2% SLOPE MAX. FOR DRAINAGE
E08 FRAMED COLUMN W/ STUCCO FINISH- PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING
COLUMNS
E09 REPLACE EXISTING WINDOW PER SCHEDULE
WALLPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
GREENWICH VILLAGE
TRIMPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
STORMY SKY
134
2 A3.11
6 3
5 A3.11 4
K14
K172' - 0" 4' - 1" 13' - 1" 5' - 0" 2' - 0"
2' - 0" 4' - 2" 2' - 6" 3' - 0"
2' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 1' - 6" 2' - 0"
8' - 0" 0' - 6"
2' - 0" 6' - 1"
7' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
5' - 0"
KITCHEN
STORAGE 3
8' - 0"
7' - 0"
6' - 0"
ALIGN W/ SOFIT ABOVE
2' - 1"
3' - 0" 2' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 1"
2' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0"
3' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0"
2' - 6" 3' - 0"
K01
K03
K04
K05
K06
K11
K12
K12
K02
K10
K08
K13
K20
K19
K20
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
3/8" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.15
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
RENDERING
06/23/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
K13
KOHLER PURIST K-24982 FAUCET;
VIBRANT STAINLESS
K01 / K02
VIKING 5 SERIES STOVE & HOOD;
STAINLESS STEEL
K06
VIKING 5 SERIES OVEN;
STAINLESS STEEL
K07
VIKING 5 SERIES REFRIGERATOR;
STAINLESS STEEL
K14
PORCELANOSA TILE;
CONCRETE GREY NATURE
K19
MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE, ECOVEIL SHEER;
METAL
K15
ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE TILE;
BLANCO IN MATTE
WALLACCENT PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
THORNTON SAGE
K12
CAESARSTONE;
EMPIRIA WHITE
K20
KARMAN, FORTE, ULTRA MATTE ACRYLIC;
METALIC SILVER
K03 / K04
VIKING 5 SERIES MICROWAVE &
WARMING DRAWER;
STAINLESS STEEL
K05
VIKING 5 SERIES DISHWASHER;
STAINLESS STEEL
SCALE:
KITCHEN MATERIAL PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0" 1
KITCHEN KEYNOTES
K01 30" GAS RANGE, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K02 30"x18" HOOD, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K03 24" WIDE UNDERCOUNTER MICROWAVE, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING DRAWERMICRO OVEN 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K04 30" WARMING DRAWER, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K05 24"x24" UNDERCOUNTER DISHWASHER, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 524 MODEL OR APPROVED EQ.
K06 30" ELECTRIC OVEN, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES VSOE350 OR APPROVED EQ.
K08 STAINLESS STEEL UNDER-MOUNT SINGLE BOWL KITCHEN SINK W/ GRABAGE DISPOSAL, KOHLER VAULT K-3821-3 OR APPROVED EQ.
K10 24"x24" PENAL-WARE 1630 SERIES STAINLESS STEEL MOP SINK OR APPROVED EQ.
K11 30" WIDE ADA COMPLIANT WORK SPACE W/ NO BASE CABINET FOR KNEE & TOE CLEARANCE.
K12 36" HIGH, STONE TOP COUNTER, TYP. @ KITCHEN, CAESARSTONE EMPIRA WHITE OR APPOVED EQ.
K13 KOHLER PURIST K-24982 FAUCET, VIBRANT STAINLESS- OR APPROVED EQ.
K14 FLOOR TILE, PORCELANOSA, CONCRETE GREY NATURE 12X24 OR APPROVED EQ.
K15 WALL TILE, ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE, BLANCO IN MATTE OR APPROED EQ.
K17 ARMTRONG LUX PLANK W/ RIGID CORE- GROVELAND NATURAL; OR APPROVED EQ.
K18 STONE COUNTERTOP WATERFALL OVER EDGE
K19 MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE SYSTEM, ECOVEIL SHEER, METAL- OR APPROVED EQ.; SEE INTERIOR ELEVATION FOR WALL LOCATION K20 KARMAN, FORTE, ULTRA MATTE ACRYLIC, COLOR METALIC SILVER OR APPROVED EQ. 135
B05
B06 B06 B06 B06
B01
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
3/8" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.16
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
RENDERING
06/23/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
B02
LARGE KOVACS BOWL P592-3;
COPPER BRONZE PATINA
B03
EMPIRE WALL SCONSE;
MODERN BRASS
WINDOW COVERINGMOTORIZED MECHO SHADE, ECOVEIL SHEER;
METAL
B06
ACCENT PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
THORNTON SAGE
B01
ARMSTRONG LUXE PLANK;
GROVELAND NATURAL
TRIMACCENT PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
STORM AF-700
B05
PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
WHITE DIAMOND
SCALE:
BALLROOM SOUTH Copy 1 3/8" = 1'-0" 1
136
A3.12
4 5
2 3
A3.12
8 9
6 7
A3.12
12 11
10 13
R23 R20 R20
213 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
182 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
ø 5' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
ø 5' - 0"
2' - 0" MIN. 2' - 0" 2' - 0"
5' - 0"
1' - 6" MIN.
1' - 9"
4' - 0"
5' - 7"
1' - 10"
5' - 0" MIN. 5' - 0"
5' - 0"
5' - 0"
2' - 0" MIN. 2' - 0" 1' - 0"
2' - 6"
1' - 5 1/2"
4' - 11"
8' - 2 1/2"
6' - 4 1/2"
2' - 0" MIN.
6' - 0"
5' - 0"
2' - 6" 1' - 3"
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
0' - 10 1/2"
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
3/8" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.17
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
RENDERING
06/23/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
WOMEN'S RESTROOM SINK MEN'S RESTROOM SINK
FLOORPORCELANOSA TILE;
CONCRETE GREY NATURE
COUNTERCAESARSTONE;
NOBLE GREY
FIXTURETOTO URINAL
WALLANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE TILE;
BLANCO IN MATTE
FIXTURETOTO TOILET
WALLANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE TILE;
GRIS IN GLOSS
FIXTURETOTO CLEAN DRY HIGH SPEED HAND DRYER;
STAINLESS STEEL
FIXTURERADLEY VERGE ZEN AUTOMATIC FAUCET;
STAINLESS STEEL
WALLACCENT PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
THORNTON SAGE
FIXTUREKOHLER VERTICYL SINK;
WHITE
SCALE:
RESTROOM MATERIAL PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0" 1
137
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
2017
A3.13
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS MATERIALS
06/16/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
BALLROOM
FLOORARMSTRONG LUXE PLANK;
GROVELAND NATURAL
WINDOW COVERINGMOTORIZED MECHO SHADE, ECOVEIL SHEER;
METAL
WALLACCENT PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
THORNTON SAGE
KITCHEN
FIXTUREKOHLER PURIST K-24982 FAUCET;
VIBRANT STAINLESS
APPLIANCEVIKING 5 SERIES STOVE & HOOD;
STAINLESS STEEL
APPLIANCEVIKING 5 SERIES OVEN;
STAINLESS STEEL
APPLIANCEVIKING 5 SERIES REFRIGERATOR;
STAINLESS STEEL
FLOORPORCELANOSA TILE;
CONCRETE GREY NATURE
WINDOW COVERINGMOTORIZED MECHO SHADE, ECOVEIL SHEER;
METAL
RESTROOM
FLOORPORCELANOSA TILE;
CONCRETE GREY NATURE
COUNTERCAESARSTONE;
NOBLE GREY
FIXTURETOTO URINAL
EXTERIOR
CONCRETE
RAILINGMETAL;
POWDER COATED BLACK
WALLANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE TILE;
BLANCO IN MATTE
WALLPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
JACK AND THE BEANSTALK
WALLANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE TILE;
BLANCO IN MATTE
FIXTURETOTO TOILET
WALLANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE TILE;
GRIS IN GLOSS
FIXTURETOTO CLEAN DRY HIGH SPEED HAND DRYER;
STAINLESS STEEL
FIXTURERADLEY VERGE ZEN AUTOMATIC FAUCET;
STAINLESS STEEL
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
WALLACCENT PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
THORNTON SAGE
WALLACCENT PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;
THORNTON SAGE
COUNTERCAESARSTONE;
EMPIRIA WHITE
CABINETKARMAN, FORTE, ULTRA MATTE ACRYLIC;
METALIC SILVER
FIXTUREKOHLER VERTICYL SINK;
WHITE
WALLPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
CEDAR GROVE
WALLPAINT COLOR BENJAMIN MOORE;
CAMBRIDGE GREEN
LIGHTING
LARGE KOVACS BOWL P592-3;
COPPER BRONZE PATINA
LIGHTING
EMPIRE WALL SCONSE;
MODERN BRASS
138
B01
B06
B06 B05 B06
B05
B06 B06 B06 B06
B01
B06 B05 B06
B04 B04 B02 B04
B04 B04 B04 B04 B04
B06 B06 B05 B06 B06
B01
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
3/8" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.10
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
INTERIOR
ELEVATIONSBALLROOM
06/16/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
BALLROOM WAST 3/8" = 1'-0" 4
SCALE:
BALLROOM SOUTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 1
SCALE:
BALLROOM EAST 3/8" = 1'-0" 3
SCALE:
BALLROOM NORTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 2
BALLROOM KEYNOTES
B01 ARMSTRONG FLORING LUXE PLANK; GROVELAND NATURAL OR
APPROVED EQ.
B02 CERTAINTEED ECOPHON SOLO PANEL, WHITE- SEE RCP
B04 MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE SYSTEM, ECOVEIL SHEER, METAL- OR APPROVED EQ.
B05 PAINT- WHITE OR APPROVED EQ.
B06 ACCENT PAINT- LIGHT GREEN OR APPROVED EQ.
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
139
2 A3.11
6 3
5 A3.11 4
K14
K17
2' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0" 3' - 0"
3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0"
3' - 6" 2' - 6" 2' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0"
K05
K13
K02
K01
K15
3' - 0"
K12
2' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0" 5' - 1" 2' - 0"
K03
K04
K06
K18
2' - 0" 4' - 1" 3' - 0"
3' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0"
3' - 0" 2' - 0" 3' - 0" 2' - 0"
K01
K02
K15
1' - 6" 2' - 10" 3' - 0"
K04
K06
K15
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
3/8" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.11
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
INTERIOR
ELEVATIONSKITCHEN
06/16/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
ENLARGED KITCHEN MATERIAL PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0" 1
SCALE:
KITCHEN WES 3/8" = 1'-0" 2
SCALE:
KITCHEN NORTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 6
SCALE:
KITCHEN EAST 1 3/8" = 1'-0" 3
SCALE:
KITCHEN SOUTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 5
SCALE:
KITCHEN EAST 2 3/8" = 1'-0" 4
KITCHEN KEYNOTES
K01 30" GAS RANGE, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K02 30"x18" HOOD, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K03 24" WIDE UNDERCOUNTER MICROWAVE, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING DRAWERMICRO OVEN 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K04 30" WARMING DRAWER, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES OR APPROVED EQ.
K05 24"x24" UNDERCOUNTER DISHWASHER, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 524 MODEL OR APPROVED EQ.
K06 30" ELECTRIC OVEN, STAINLESS STEEL, VIKING 5 SERIES VSOE350 OR APPROVED EQ.
K08 STAINLESS STEEL UNDER-MOUNT SINGLE BOWL KITCHEN SINK W/ GRABAGE DISPOSAL, KOHLER VAULT K-3821-3 OR APPROVED EQ.
K10 24"x24" PENAL-WARE 1630 SERIES STAINLESS STEEL MOP SINK OR APPROVED EQ.
K11 30" WIDE ADA COMPLIANT WORK SPACE W/ NO BASE CABINET FOR KNEE & TOE CLEARANCE.
K12 36" HIGH, STONE TOP COUNTER, TYP. @ KITCHEN, CAESARSTONE EMPIRA WHITE OR APPOVED EQ.
K13 KOHLER PURIST K-24982 FAUCET, VIBRANT STAINLESS- OR APPROVED EQ.
K14 FLOOR TILE, PORCELANOSA, CONCRETE GREY NATURE 12X24 OR APPROVED EQ.
K15 WALL TILE, ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE, BLANCO IN MATTE OR APPROED EQ.
K17 ARMTRONG LUX PLANK W/ RIGID CORE- GROVELAND NATURAL; OR APPROVED EQ.
K18 STONE COUNTERTOP WATERFALL OVER EDGE
K19 MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE SYSTEM, ECOVEIL SHEER, METAL- OR APPROVED EQ.; SEE INTERIOR ELEVATION FOR WALL LOCATION K20 KARMAN, FORTE, ULTRA MATTE ACRYLIC, COLOR METALIC SILVER OR APPROVED EQ.
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
140
A3.12
4 5
2 3
A3.12
8 9
6 7
A3.12
12 11
10 13
R23 R20 R20
80"
42" 4" 34"
R13
R05 R06 R03
R22 R21
46" 34"
48" MAX.
R03
R13
R07
R01
R21
R08
R08
R21
R01 R01 R01
34" 46" 10"
R01
R04 R05
R13
R21
3' - 8"
R02
R01
R21
R01 R01
R08
R21 R21
46" 34"
2' - 0"
R21
R03
R13
5' - 0" 5' - 2"
42" 38"
5' - 8" 1' - 0"
1' - 0"
6' - 8"
48" MAX.
R02 R02
R13
R07
R21 R22 R21
4" 34"
R13
R21
R21
R03
R13
42" 4" 34"
42" 4" 34"
R22
R03 R05 R06
R13 R13 48" MAX.
46" 4" 34"
R07
R21
R05 R04
R13
PROJECT
#:
SHEET #:
SHEET
NAME:
SHEET
ISSUE
DATE:
PROJECT
PHASE:
DRAWING
SET:
SCALE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
DATE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SHT. __ OF__
FILE NUMBER
DATE ADJ. , QUAD.
No. , ELEV.
BENCH MARK:
DATE
BUILDING #:
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ENGINEER NAME, RCE LICENSE No.
STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
L ICENSED ARCHI TECT
NO. C 9412
REN. 5/31/21
STEPHEN M.
ALBERT
SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42" ARCH E1
DO NOT SCALE
3/8" = 1'-0"
2017
A3.12
CITY REVIEW
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
INTERIOR
ELEVATIONSRESTROOM
06/16/21 861 VALLEY DR.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
CIP 698--CLARK BUILDING REMODEL
SCALE:
ENGLARGED RESTROOM MATERIAL PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0" 1
SCALE: WOMEN'S RESTROOM WEST 3/8" = 1'-0" 9
SCALE: WOMEN'S RESTROOM NORTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 6
SCALE: WOMEN'S RESTROOM EAST 3/8" = 1'-0" 7
SCALE: WOMEN'S RESTROOM SOUTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 8SCALE:
MEN'S RESTROOM SOUTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 4
SCALE:
MEN'S RESTROOM WEST 3/8" = 1'-0" 5
SCALE:
MEN'S RESTROOM NORTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 2
SCALE:
MEN'S RESTROOM EAST 3/8" = 1'-0" 3
SCALE: WOMEN'S VANITY SOUTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 12
SCALE: WOME'S VANITY WEST 3/8" = 1'-0" 13
SCALE: WOMEN'S VANITY NORTH 3/8" = 1'-0" 10
SCALE: WOMEN'S VANITY EAST 3/8" = 1'-0" 11
RESTROOM KEYNOTES
R01 WATER CLOSET, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 2|ACC.3 "ULTRA LOW FLUSH" TYPE TOILET: MAX 1.28 GAL/FLUSH (TOTO CT705ULN(G) OR APPROVED EQ.) 29" DEEP MAX, RECESSED TOTO ECOPOWER CONCEALED FLUSH
VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL
R02 URINAL, "ULTRA HIGH EFFICIENCY" TYPE URINAL: MAX. 0.125 GAL/FLUSH (TOTO UT445U(V) W/ CONCEALED TOTO ECOPOWER FLUSH VALVE - ADA COMPLIANT, OR APPROVED EQ.)
R03 COUNTERTOP, ADA COMPLIANT, MIN 27" KNEE CLR A.F.F., CAESARSTONE- NOBLE GREY OR APPROVED EQ.
R04 UNDERMOUNT LAVATORY BASIN, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 2|ACC.2, KOHLER VERTICYL MODEL NO. K-2882-0, WHITE OR APPROVED EQ R05 LAVATORY FAUCET, AUTOMATIC, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 7|ACC.1, BRADLEY VERGE ZEN SERIES S53-3700 OR APPROVED EQ.
R06 SOAP DISPENSER, DECK MOUNTED, AUTOMATIC, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 7|ACC.1, BRADLEY VERGE ZEN SERIES 6-3700 OR APPROVED EQ.
R07 HAND DRYER, ADA COMPLIANT, SEE 7,8|ACC.1, TOTO CLEAN DRY HIGH SPEED HAND DRYER HDR111#SS
R08 HANDICAP GRAB BAR, ICC 11B COMPLIANT, SEE 3,5|ACC.2 R09 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL, TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES PARTITION-MOUNTED B-357 OR APPROVED EQ.
R10 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL, TOILET TISSUE
DISPENSER, ADA COMPLIANT- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES RECESSED B-3574 OR APPROVED EQ.
R11 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER, ADA
COMPLIANT- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES RECESSED B-34745 OR
APPROVED EQ.
R12 SEAT-COVER DISPENSER, TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER- BOBRICK CLASSIC SERIES RECESSED B-3474 OR APPROVED EQ.
R13 FRAMELESS MIRROR; SIZE AND HEIGHT PER INTERIOR ELEVATIONS R20 FLOOR TILE, PORCELANOSA, CONCRETE GREY NATURE 12X24 OR APPROVED EQ.
R21 WALL TILE, ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE, BLANCO IN MATTE OR APPROED EQ.
R22 WALL TILE, ANN SACKS ARCILLA RECTANGLE, GRIS IN GLOSS OR APPROED EQ.
R23 ARMTRONG LUX PLANK W/ RIGID CORE- GROVELAND NATURAL; OR APPROVED EQ.
REVISIONS
No. DESCRIPTION DATE
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
CLARK COMMUNITY CENTER RENOVATION
171
VALLEY DRIVE
(E) SIDEWALK
(E) BASEBALL
FEILD
(E) LAWN
BOWLING FEILD
CLARK BUILDING COMMUNTY CENTER
BUILDING TOTAL = 5,119 SF
EXTENT OF ARCHITECTURAL SCOPE
N
Exterior Scope of Work
COSMETIC UPGRADES
ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES
SOLAR ROOF ARRAY
172
VALLEY DRIVE
(E) SIDEWALK
(E) BASEBALL
FEILD
(E) LAWN BOWLING FEILD
CLARK BUILDING COMMUNTY CENTER
N
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVELACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL Accessibility Upgrades 5 ADDITIONAL RAMPS
KITCHEN ACCESSIBILITY
RESTROOM ACCESSIBILITY
173
VALLEY DRIVE
(E) SIDEWALK
(E) BASEBALL
FEILD
(E) LAWN BOWLING FEILD
CLARK BUILDING COMMUNTY CENTER
N
Accessibility Upgrades
TRASH ENCLOSURE
KITCHEN AND STORAGE ACCESS
174
Ballroom Scope of Work
FLOORING
CEILING AND LIGHTING
ACOUSTICS
WINDOW SHADES
AIR CONDITIONING
STAGE AND AUDIO/VISUAL
REMOVE FIREPLACE LARGE KOVACS BOWL; COPPER BRONZE PATINA EMPIRE WALL SCONSE; MODERN BRASS WINDOW COVERING- MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE, ECOVEIL SHEER;METAL
ACCENT PAINT COLOR,
BENJAMIN MOORE;THORNTON SAGE
ARMSTRONG LUXE PLANK;
GROVELAND NATURAL
ACCENT PAINT COLOR,
BENJAMIN MOORE;STORM AF-700
PAINT COLOR, BENJAMIN MOORE;WHITE DIAMOND
175
STORAGE FOR APPROX.
(25) 6' ROUND TABLES & 150 FOLDING CHAIRS
STORAGE 1 STORAGE 2
STORAGE 3
BALLROOM
EXISTING STRUCTUE ABOVE
SPEAKER LOCATION 3 LIGHTING OPTIONS
Usability and Flexibility
3 STORAGE LOCATIONS
MOVABLE STAGE
LIGHTING OPTIONS
ADDED A/V EQUIPMENT
176
KITCHEN
STORAGE 3
Kitchen Scope of Work
FLOORING
CEILING AND LIGHTING
APPLIANCES
WINDOW SHADES
CABINETRY, COUNTERTOP, TILE
VIKING 5 SERIES STOVE & HOODVIKING 5 SERIES OVENVIKING 5 SERIES REFRIGERATOR PORCELANOSA TILE; CONCRETE GREY NATURE
MOTORIZED MECHO SHADE, ECOVEIL SHEER;METAL
ANN SACKS ARCILLA
RECTANGLE TILE;BLANCO IN MATTE
ACCENT PAINT COLOR,
BENJAMIN MOORE;THORNTON SAGE
CAESARSTONE;EMPIRIA WHITE
KARMAN, FORTE, ULTRA MATTE ACRYLIC;METALIC SILVER
VIKING 5 SERIES MICROWAVE & WARMING DRAWERVIKING 5 SERIES DISHWASHER 177
Restroom Scope of Work
FLOORING
CEILING AND LIGHTING
FIXTURES
COUNTERTOP, TILE
REMOVE FIREPLACE FOR
UPDATED FIXTURE COUNT AND
ACCESSIBILITY
PORCELANOSA TILE; CONCRETE GREY NATURE
TOTO URINAL
ANN SACKS ARCILLA
RECTANGLE TILE;BLANCO IN MATTE
TOTO TOILET
ANN SACKS ARCILLA
RECTANGLE TILE;GRIS IN GLOSS
TOTO CLEAN DRY HIGH SPEED HAND DRYER RADLEY VERGE ZEN
AUTOMATIC FAUCET
ACCENT PAINT COLOR,
BENJAMIN MOORE;THORNTON SAGE
178
For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in
Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.
Get Adobe Reader Now!
179
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0035
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
DESIGNATION OF A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FEE WAIVERS TO BE
GRANTED FOR SPECIAL EVENTS HELD IN 2022
(Community Resources Manager Lisa Nichols)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council designate a maximum amount of $20,000 in fee waivers to be granted for special events held in 2022, as per the City’s Special Event Fee Waiver Policy.
Executive Summary:
The City’s Special Event Policy Guide, adopted by City Council in 2017, outlines policies and procedures required of event producers to hold an event on public property within the City of Hermosa Beach. An updated Special Event Fee Waiver Policy was included following its adoption by the City Council on October 10, 2019. The Special Event Fee Waiver Policy requires City Council to annually designate a maximum amount of fee waivers that may be granted for special events held in each calendar year. As staff develops the 2022 calendar of events, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission’s (Commission) consideration of fee waiver requests must take place soon to ensure event producers have time to financially plan for their events.
Therefore, staff requests City Council designate the maximum amount of fee waivers that can be applied to qualified events held in 2022.
Background:
The City’s Special Event Policy Guide (Attachment 1), adopted by City Council in 2017, outlines policies and procedures required of event producers to hold an event on public property within the City of Hermosa Beach. At its October 10, 2019 meeting, City Council approved the Commission’s recommended Special Event Fee Waiver Policy.
The policy provides the Commission the ability to approve the award of fee waivers through a grant process. As detailed in the policy, City Council is to annually affirm the maximum amount of grant funding available to the Commission to award to qualified events for the upcoming calendar year. City Council designated a maximum of $20,000 for events held in each of the last two, calendar years.
Unfortunately, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, events were unable to be held in the 2020 calendar City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 7 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™180
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0035
Unfortunately, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, events were unable to be held in the 2020 calendar year or from January through March of the 2021 calendar year. Therefore, no fee waivers were granted during these time periods. The fee waivers granted in the remainder of the 2021 calendar year, from April through December, can be found in Table 1 below:
City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 7 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™181
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0035
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 7 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™182
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0035
At its October 12, 2021 meeting, City Council approved an additional waiver of $23,542 for the Hermosa Holidays event organized for community-wide benefit by the Chamber of Commerce. This was a one-time waiver of two days of Pier Plaza Use Fees. Future requests for fee waivers would be handled through the formalized grant process per policy.
Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
October 10, 2019 Council approves adoption of Special Event Fee Waiver Policy
October 12, 2021 Council approves a one-time waiver of two days of Pier Plaza Use Fees for Hermosa Holidays event
Discussion:
The Special Event Policy Guide outlines the Special Event Fee Waiver policy and the level of fee waivers that can be awarded in addition to the types of fees that are eligible for fee waiver consideration, including:
“Grants will be awarded up to a maximum of $2,500 per event or a 50 percent reduction of indirect City special event fees, whichever is the lesser amount.” Each organization that meets the qualifications of the grant policy, may receive the lesser amount of $2,500 or 50 percent of applicable special event fees (indirect costs) eligible for reduction. Fees applied toward the application fee, staff time, inspections, Police or Fire services, etc. are ineligible.
Those fees that are eligible for fee reductions include daily permit fees, set-up and tear-down fees, etc. Included in Table 2 are the various special event fees categorized between indirect or direct fees:
City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 7 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™183
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0035
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 7 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™184
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0035
As required in the Special Event Fee Waiver Policy, City Council must annually determine a maximum amount of fee waivers the Commission can award to qualifying events for each calendar year. The City Council designated the maximum of $20,000 in fee waiver grants for each of the 2020 and 2021 calendar years. As previously noted, grant funding was not awarded in 2020 and from January through March in 2021 due to event cancelations associated with COVID-19 precautionary measures.
General Plan Consistency:
This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:
Parks and Open Space Element
Goal 3. Community parks and facilities encourage social activity and interaction.
Policy:
• 3.1 Community-friendly events. Encourage, permit, and support community group, nonprofit, or business organized events on City property that support physical activity, beach culture, and family-friendly social interactions.
Goal 8. Special events at the beach are balanced to support community recreation and economic development without restricting coastal access or impacting the community.
Policies:
• 8.2. Off-peak season events. Incentivize event producers to host special events during offpeak seasons through reduced fees or accommodating location/reserved area preferences. • 8.6. Special event impact fees. Require special event applicants pay a fair share of costs associated with impacts on City services and facilities required to support special events.
Fiscal Impact:
The fiscal impact associated with the recommended action is unknown since the 2022 Special Event Calendar continues to be developed and it is unknown at this time how many event producers intend to apply for this aid.
City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 7 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™185
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0035
Attachments:
1. Special Events Policy Guide
2. Link to October 10, 2019 City Council Report
3. Link to October 12, 2021 City Council Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Nichols, Community Resources Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 7 Printed on 5/24/2023
powered by Legistar™186
HERMOSA BEACH
SPECIAL EVENTS POLICY GUIDE
187
1 This policy guide has been developed to clarify and carry out the City’s mission statement related to special events that occur on outdoor public spaces within the community.
Cover Image: Hermosa Beach Murals Project - John Van Hamersveld Mission Statement
Hermosa Beach strives to offer a safe and enjoyable environment for special events to take place in a way that balances resident and visitor needs. Special events in Hermosa Beach are celebrated for being community-friendly, enhancing local beach culture, and offering a myriad of benefits to the local community. The City of Hermosa Beach* works collaboratively with event operators in an efficient and clear manner to process and carry out permits in compliance with this policy.
* “City of Hermosa Beach” collectively refers to City staff, Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission, City Manager, and City Council.
City Contact Information
The City of Hermosa Beach Department of Community Resources is available to assist and answer any questions related to the special events process:
Website: www.hermosabeach.gov
Phone: (310) 318-0280
Email: [email protected]
Address: 710 Pier Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
188
2 Table of Contents
General Information + Frequently Asked Questions..............................................................................................3 When is a special events permit required?
How do I apply for a special events permit?
Are private events allowed?
What is the “Nothing Weekend”?
How will this policy be enforced?
Where are special events allowed?
Use Classification + Impact Characteristics……………………………………………………………………………….…...…………………6 Impact Characteristics Matrix
Pass-Through Events
Pier Plaza Promotions
Approval Guidelines + Requirements………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….7 Event Approval Findings
Application Submittal Deadlines and Approval Process
Peak Season Event Limits
Simultaneous Use of North and South Volleyball Courts
Pre/Post Event Meetings
Accessibility Plan
Site Plan, Equipment, and Signage
Amplified Sound
Food, Beverage, or Merchandise Sales
Professional Filming
Security
Insurance
Event Day Expectations
Applicable Fees………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………10 Current Fee Schedule
Application Fees
Special Events Permit Fee
Additional Fees
Damage Deposit
Refund/Cancellation Policy
Compliance…...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………12 Environmental Requirements
Applicable Codes + Regulations
Fee Waivers…...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………13 Funding Limits
Eligibility
Approval
Obligations
Disqualification
Long-term Agreements…...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………15 Eligibility
Term Limits
Procedures
Obligations
189
3 General Information + Frequently Asked Questions
When is a special events permit required?
Any organized event, activity, celebration, or function involving the use of the beach at which one hundred (100) or more persons are to be assembled, or use of outdoor city facilities, rights-of-way, or parkland at which twenty-five (25) or more persons are to be assembled requires a special events permit. Additionally, special events permits shall be required for any commercial or non-profit group requesting use of any outdoor area or public facility within the city.
How do I apply for a special events permit?
Applications for special events must be submitted using the online form on the City of Hermosa Beach website and questions may be directed toward the Department of Community Resources.
Are private events allowed?
All events located on the beach within the commercial zone, the Pier, or Pier Plaza must be open to spectators/general public free of charge. Participant entry fees are permissible.
What is the “Nothing Weekend”?
On at least one weekend during each summer season, the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission will recommend that no special events permits be issued. This means that any application for a special events permit that coincides with the designated “Nothing Weekend” will be asked to change dates in order for their event to be considered.
How will this policy be enforced?
The special events policy will be strictly enforced by Community Resources Department staff, Code Enforcement Officers, and the Police Department. Events, either permitted or unpermitted, found to be violating the City's rules or failing to comply with any of the requirements of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code may be subject to penalties or fines. Special events, and any of its participants, vendors, or spectators, found to have caused damage or be in violation of any City rules may be subject to greater deposits, regulation, or restrictions when submitting special events applications in the future.
Where are special events allowed?
To ensure adequate space and resources are available, and to limit potential disturbances to residents, special events are limited to the following locations:
• South of Pier (Adjacent to the commercial area on the beach (between 10th Street and the pier); • North of the Pier (Adjacent to the commercial area on the beach (between the pier and 15th Street • Designated Surf Zone
• Along The Strand (only allowed for races or events that are continuously moving); • Pier Plaza
• Within a public right of way (please note that any event, race, or block party within the public right of way is subject to approval by the Chief of Police);
• The following City Parks and Facilities
o Valley Park: Corner of Gould and Valley Drive
o Community Center: 710 Pier Avenue
o Clark Field: 861 Valley Drive
o South Park: 425 Valley Drive
o Greenwood Park: PCH & Aviation
o Edith Rodaway Park: Prospect & Hollowell Ave
o The Greenbelt
Events on the beach outside of the commercial area (between 10th and 15th Street) are not permitted. 190
4 Special Events Permitted Locations
191
5 Beach Special Event Boundaries
192
6 Use Classifications + Impact Characteristics
Special events are evaluated based on a number of factors and will be categorized as a level I, II, or III event based on the information provided in the special events application. Once the information is submitted and reviewed by the Community Resources Department, City staff will determine the impact level of the event using the impact characteristics matrix.
The impact level of the event will be used to determine:
o applicable fees;
o timing of application submittal;
o requirements for pre event meeting and post event walk through; and o level of review for approval (City staff, Commission or City Council) Impact Characteristics Matrix
If more than one option is applicable, the highest characteristic will be considered to determine the impact level.
Characteristic Impact Level I Impact Level II Impact Level III Attendees and spectators total 100-500 501 – 1,999 2,000 or more Event has previously occurred in
Hermosa Beach
3 or more years 1 or 2 years New event
Event location(s) a park or the beach Pier or Pier Plaza Streets, the Strand, or public right of way
Event season(s) Winter Spring or Fall Summer
Event day(s) Monday - Thursday Friday, Saturday, or
Sunday
Holiday
Total event days per year
(including set-up and tear-down)
1-2 3-4 5 or more
Events per year 1-2 3-4 5 or more
Additional requests such as
filming, reserved parking,
fencing, stage, street closures, or
amplified sound
None 1-2 3 or more
Impact Level 5 or more applicable =
Impact Level I
2 or more applicable =
Impact Level II
2 or more applicable =
Impact Level III
Pass-Through Events
A pass-through event is exactly what the name implies, the event participants pass through the City of Hermosa Beach and the event does not start or end in Hermosa Beach. A special events application is required to be submitted and pass-through events must also go through the approval process required based on the impact level assigned to the event.
Pier Plaza Promotions
The Pier Plaza Promotion option is designed to provide companies or event sponsors a one-day promotional opportunity on Pier Plaza subject to a Pier Plaza use fee. These events must be strictly commercial product or service promotions and not special events. Companies or sponsors who request approval for this use will be required to submit a special events application.
193
7 Approval Guidelines + Requirements
Event Approval Findings
A special events permit may be issued upon finding that:
1. The applicant reimburses the City for all costs incurred by the City in connection with the event, including public safety, traffic control and monitoring.
2. The number of estimated attendees can be accommodated at the proposed location and surrounding area.
3. The applicant is capable and qualified to manage the event in a competent, professional manner in accordance with all conditions of approval.
4. Adequate provision has been made for satellite parking, shuttle transportation and traffic control (as requested and determined by City staff).
5. Adequate provision has been made for security, crowd control, ingress and egress, and clean-up.
6. The total number of days required for the event shall not exceed sixteen consecutive days.
7. The applicant provides required insurance, deposits, bonding and indemnification of the City.
Application Submittal Deadlines and Approval Process
Special Events Applications must be submitted as follows:
• Level III events: Must be submitted no later than July 30 for the following calendar year. Will be subject to a public hearing by both the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council. Upon approval by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and City Council, permits will be processed and issued by the Community Resources Manager.
o New events: Please note, any events that are new to Hermosa Beach will need to follow the approval process for impact level III events.
• Level II events: Must be submitted at least ninety (90) days in advance of the event, but no earlier than October 15 of the prior calendar year. Upon Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommendation, the Community Resources Manager may process and issue permits. Should the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission recommend denial of a Special Event, that decision may be appealed to the City Council.
• Level I events: Must be submitted at least thirty (30) days, but no earlier than October 15 of the prior calendar year. Level I events will be reviewed and permits will be issued by the Community Resources Manager. Should the Community Resources recommend denial of a Special Event, that decision may be appealed to the City Council. o Pier Plaza Promotions: Review and approval of Pier Plaza Promotion events will follow the same approval process as Level I events.
The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and City Council will evaluate and recommend approval of Level III events and a “Nothing Weekend” first, and then will consider approval of Level II events. Events submitted earliest will be given priority for their preferred dates.
Review Timeline Application Period
Opens
Last Day to Submit
Application Commission Review City Council Review
Level I
October 15
(for following
calendar year)
30 days prior to event n/a n/a
Level II
October 15
(for following
calendar year)
90 days prior to event Beginning in December n/a
Level III
July 1
(for following
calendar year)
July 30
(for following
calendar year)
September Meeting –
Public Hearing
October Meeting –
Public Hearing
At the discretion of the Community Resources Manager, special events applications may be submitted and approved after the application submittal deadline has passed, provided:
194
8 • there are unforeseeable circumstances (memorial service, team victory celebration, need for minimal marketing/advertising)
• the event does not exceed Peak Season Event Limits
• the event can still meet all of the event approval findings (as noted on Page 9) The Community Resources Manager and the City’s Special Events Team will participate in the review and approval of event applicants submitted after the deadline has passed. The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission will receive an update on the status of events submitted after the deadlines.
City staff will provide both a calendar of all upcoming special events and a brief event wrap-up summary for special events to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and City Council (if required).
Event organizers are expected to be present at the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and City Council meetings (if required) where their event is scheduled to be reviewed.
Peak Season Event Limits
To balance coastal access with beach events, the beach/Pier Plaza area will be limited to the following number of events during the peak summer season (Memorial Day to Labor Day – approximately 100 days over the summer):
o Maximum of 30 days used by Level III Events
o Maximum of 40 days used by Level I and II Events, City Sponsored/Contracted Events, and Long-Term Agreement events (on days not used by Level III Events) Additionally, the monthly number of event limits for off-peak season (Labor Day to Memorial Day) will be limited to a maximum of 15 days used by events per month.
Simultaneous Use of North and South Volleyball Courts
One side of the North and South of Pier Volleyball courts will be required to remain open for general public use during special events occurring on weekends (exception provided for events that occur at the same time as City-sponsored classes utilizing the North or South of Pier Volleyball Courts) or at the discretion of the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission and the City Council.
Pre/Post Event Meetings
Pre-event meetings and post-event walkthrough/evaluations with City staff and event producers may be required.
A “pre-event meeting” may be scheduled anytime between 3 months to several weeks prior to the actual event date as determined by City staff. The goal of this meeting is to provide information to any and all City departments involved or impacted by your event. The Community Resources Department may require any event to have an “on-site meeting” prior to the event and a final site map must be presented at this time. City staff may require multiple meetings if the event details require further discussion or if additional information is requested. First-time events that expect to be recurring events may also be required to attend a “post-event meeting.” The Community Resources Department will invite representatives from other City Departments to these meetings if who may be involved or affected by your event.
Permits may also specify a time for a “post-event walkthrough” where he applicant, event coordinator, or another authorized representative of the applicant is required to be present during the “post-event walkthrough” inspection, as staff will walk through the site and assess the condition it was left in.
Failure to participate in pre or post meeting events, may jeopardize your approved event or future events in Hermosa Beach.
Site Plan, Equipment, and Signage
A detailed map schematic must be submitted to move forward with the review and approval process that includes the proposed location of the event, including all temporary facilities/structures/signage/equipment to be erected, ingress and egress, number and type of vehicles and whether existing structures/facilities are to be relocated or modified.
Events requiring Building, Police, or Fire Department review, must include maps and plans that are drawn to scale. 195
9 A parking plan showing the number of public parking spaces to be occupied by the event organizers, the location of satellite parking lots to be used for attendee parking, arrangements for shuttle bus transportation, and plans for publicizing the availability of off-site public parking may also be required.
Events that set up bleachers, stages higher than 2’ off the ground, fencing or other temporary structures will be subject to review and inspection by the City Building Official prior to the start of the event. Accessibility compliance will be required for seating, bleachers or any stages higher than 2’ off the ground. Pedestrian access shall be maintained and a layout plan may be required to ensure proper access and circulation.
Events including promotional signs/banners, a frame signs, and other signage items shall not be placed on City facilities or premises without prior written approval from the City and must include a temporary sign/banner permit and site plan.
Accessibility Plan
It is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with all City, County, State and Federal disability access requirements applicable to the event, including the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). All indoor and outdoor sites, activities and programs must be accessible to persons with disabilities.
Amplified Sound
Amplified sound (Public Address system for announcements, etc.) is limited to the hours of 10:00 AM to 9:00 PM for up to a total of four hours in any day. Exceptions may be approved for special events, in conjunction with the Special Event approval. Events must comply with the City Noise Ordinance HBMC 8.24 and speakers must be facing westward (towards the ocean) at all times. Event producers are required to obtain an Amplified Sound Permit if the event intends to use a loudspeaker or sound amplifying equipment for the purpose of giving instructions, directions, lectures, or transmitting music. Requests should be noted when submitting a special events application to the Community Resources Department to ensure proper coordination with the Chief of Police. The Chief of Police will consider the following in the issuance of amplified sound permits:
1. The volume and intensity of the noise, particularly as it is experienced within a residence or place of business;
2. Whether the noise is prolonged and continuous;
3. How the noise contrasts with the ambient noise level;
4. The proximity of the noise source to residential and commercial uses;
5. The time of day; and
6. The anticipated duration of the noise
Food, Beverage, or Merchandise Sales
In accordance with HBMC Section 12.20.300, the sale of food, non-alcoholic beverages, or branded merchandise from the event producer on the beach are allowed pursuant to a special events permit approved by the City Council. The sale of any other commodity, merchandise, wares, products, or service on the beach or the strand is not allowed.
Applicant is responsible for obtaining any applicable food or beverage permits. A Temporary Food Permit is required when selling, serving, giving away, or sampling food or consumable products, including water or other beverages, at a public event. Additionally, each food vendor at the event must also have a Temporary Food Permit. Different permits, policies and procedures depend on the classification and the number of days of the event. As part of the food handling requirements, applicants or event organizers are required to include public safety features in the event plans such as hand-washing sinks. The County of Los Angeles Department of Environmental Health issues food permits. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure all vendors have current permits.
If the sale of alcohol is included in a special event application (requests for alcohol on the beach will not be approved), approval from the City Council is required and the applicant must request authorization from the State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC). A copy of the ABC License must be provided to the Community Resources Department prior to the issuance of a permit. City departments may place restrictions on the way in which alcohol is managed at a proposed event.
196
10 Professional Filming
A Film Permit Application is required for any event utilizing professional filming equipment or recording activities resulting in commercial use. Information about professional filming permits can be obtained on the City of Hermosa Beach website.
Security
City staff or law enforcement may deem an activity warrants the presence of one or more Police Officers or security personnel and the cost of such services shall be borne by the applicant. Security personnel must be licensed, in uniform and are subject to approval by the City. Proof of obtaining the required security personnel must be provided to the Community Resources Manager at least two (2) weeks prior to the event.
Portable Restrooms + Hand Sanitizing/Sink Facilities
Events may be required to provide portable restrooms and hand-sanitizing/sink facilities. The cost of such services shall be borne by the applicant. The number of portable restrooms and hand-sanitizing/sink facilities required will be determined by City staff and factors such as the event location, total duration of the event, estimated attendance (participants and spectators), season the event takes place and whether food and beverage will be served will be considered. City staff will designate the location for any portable restrooms and hand-sanitizing/sink facilities required at the event location.
Insurance
At least ten (10) days prior to the event, applicants will provide the City with a certificate of insurance providing liability insurance naming the “City, its officers, employees, and agents as additional insured” (exact verbiage is required) with a minimum coverage of $2 million combined single limit coverage.
The policy shall also contain the statement that the City will be notified thirty (30) calendar days prior to termination, reduction, cancellation, suspension, or expiration of the policy. Applicants and Event Organizers must agree to hold the City harmless and to indemnify the City. Approved events will require the authorized applicant or event organizer to sign a Hold Harmless Statement on the permit itself. Events with vendors or active participants require a vendor and or participant waiver that indemnifies the City.
Event Day Expectations
In order to immediately address any issues or changes that may arise during the course of an event, producers are responsible for:
• Providing a cell phone number upon which City staff may contact the producer • Being available on-site or providing a designated contact at all times during the event. This includes agreement that producers (or their designated contact) will not actively participate in the event. • Maintaining copies of all applicable special events permits and any other permits issued by the City of Hermosa Beach on-site during the event.
Applicable Fees
All special events are subject to an application fee, special event category fees and additional fees established by resolution of the City Council and any additional costs incurred by the City on behalf of the event.
Payment of special event fees is due upon receipt. The Community Resources Manager has the discretion to revoke a permit or place a hold on processing future event applications if all applicable fees are not paid in a timely manner. 197
11 Current Fee Schedule
Event Categories Fee
Category I
• Less than 500 people
Non-profit: $2 per registrant
and roster or participants due to City
Commercial: 70/30
split of proceeds
and roster or participants due to City
Category II
• Impacts public areas for no longer than one (1) day including set-up/tear-down • Is conducted in the off-season (not between Memorial Day and Labor Day or on any holiday)
• Participant plus spectator crowd more than 500 but less than 3,000 • Has no television coverage (except news)
• A non-profit entity is the beneficiary of the net revenues (100%) • Does not meet any of the identifying criteria for a Category III or IV event $2,940 per event day
Category III
• Impacts public areas for more than one (1) day including set-up/teardown • Participant plus Spectator crowd does not exceed 5,000 • Has no television coverage (except news)
• Has more than $3,000 and less than $50,000 in prize money • Does not meet any of the identifying criteria for a Category IV event $3,235 per event day
Category IV
• Meets Category III Criteria and has one or more of the following:
▪ Has network television coverage
▪ Estimated participant/spectator crowds exceed 5,000 people ▪ Prize money in excess of $50,000
▪ Charges admission to spectator
▪ Gross revenues in excess of $50,000
$5,882 per event day
Additional Fees Fees
Commercial Application Fee - non-refundable $924
Non-Profit Application Fee - non-refundable $616
Pass-Thru Application Fee - non-refundable $308
Amplified Sound Permit $181
Pier Plaza Use Fee $12,312 per event day
Event Co-Sponsor $311 each
Event Set-Up/Tear-Down $278 per location, per day
Community Resources Staff $369 per day
Parking Meter Space Fee $1.25 per hour (8am-8pm)
$1.50 per hour (8pm-8am)
Please note that fees may be updated at any time.
Depending on event details additional fees may apply due to required staffing and/or services from the City of Hermosa Beach’s Building Division, Public Works Department and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 198
12 Application Fees
Upon review of the special events application, City staff will follow up to the event contact to collect payment of the application fee, which will be due immediately to continue the review and approval process. This fee will not be applied to special events permit fees and is non-refundable.
Special Events Permit Fees
Events are subject to a daily permit fee based on the designated event category level.
Payment of applicable special event permit fees shall be due following event approval and must be submitted at least 10 days in advance of the scheduled event.
Additional Fees
The Community Resources Department will confirm the necessary permits during application review and will coordinate with applicants to secure permits and process fees from the appropriate City departments once the Special Event is approved by the appropriate review body. Additional fees may be required for:
• the use of Pier Plaza and reservation of City Facilities • installation of street banners or temporary signs
• reservation/use of public parking spaces
• use of amplified sound
• use of professional filming or still photography
• presence of police, fire, community resources, or paramedic staff on site before, during or after event • application for business license
Damage Deposit
Monetary deposits, bonds and other security may be necessary to guarantee performance of all required conditions, clean-up and repair of any City property or facilities damaged as a result of the event. Events may be required to submit a deposit to cover any potential damage to City facilities. All or a portion of the deposit may be refunded upon post event inspection or sign-off by Public Works, Chief of Police, or other applicable City staff. Events will be billed for the costs to repair or replace any City property damaged as a result of the event if the damage exceeds the deposit provided.
Refund/Cancellation Policy
Once a permit is approved and issued, the special events permit and additional impact fees may be refunded when written notice is given to the Community Resources Department at least two weeks prior to the event date and provided that no staff services are incurred. If rain is predicted and the decision is made to cancel within two weeks prior to the event, no monetary refund will be given but City staff will work with event producers to re-schedule events to another available date.
Compliance
Environmental Requirements
All events will be required to submit an environmental protection plan showing proposed compliance to reduce environmental impacts as part of the application form. Such measures may include, but shall not be limited to:
• Waste recycling and reduction
• Energy efficiency
• Protection of the marine environment
• Community education opportunities
• Monitoring and reporting compliance with the environmental protection plan 199
13 Applicable Codes + Regulations
The City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code governs the approval, review, and enforcement of Special Events. The Special Event Policy rules and regulations must be strictly adhered to and all pertinent City Ordinances shall be enforced.
The sections of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relevant to Special Events include:
Title 8 – Health and Safety
8.24 Noise Control -
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach08/HermosaBeach0824.html
8.64 Ban on Polystyrene Food Service Ware –
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach08/HermosaBeach0864.html#8.64 Title 9 – Public Peace Morals and Welfare
9.28 Parties, Events and Gatherings on Private Property http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach09/HermosaBeach0928.html#9.28 Title 10 – Vehicles and Traffic
10.28 Loading and Unloading
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach10/HermosaBeach1028.html#10.28
10.32 Stopping, Standing and Parking
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach10/HermosaBeach1032.html#10.32 Title 12 Street, Sidewalks and Public Places
12.20 Beach and Strand Regulations
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach12/HermosaBeach1220.html#12.20
12.24 Municipal Pier
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach12/HermosaBeach1224.html#12.24
12.28 Parks, Playgrounds and Other Public Areas
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/HermosaBeach/#!/HermosaBeach12/HermosaBeach1228.html#12.28 Fee Waivers
To support qualifying organizations, the City provides special event fee waiver grant opportunities to assist in its success by relieving the financial burden associated with the cost of the City’s special event fees. The Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Policy is intended for those events required to complete the annual application filing, review, and approval process. Events and organizations that qualify for a long-term agreement are not bound to the terms of this policy.
Funding Limits
The Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (“Commission”) awards grant funding for qualified organizations that have received approval to hold their event in the City of Hermosa Beach. The annual award limit of the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant is approved by the City Council each fall for the upcoming calendar year. 200
14 Grants will be awarded up to a maximum of $2,500 per event or a 50% reduction of indirect City special event fees, whichever is the lesser amount.
Awards may only be used toward indirect special event fees charged by the City; direct costs (i.e. application processing fee, inspections, staff time, Police or Fire services, etc.) are not eligible for consideration of this grant and organizations are required to pay those in full. A fee worksheet is included in the Fee Waiver Grant Application that further outlines those fees eligible under this grant. The minimum amount of requested special event fee waiver grants must total at least $250. Fee waivers will not be considered for events taking place between Memorial Day and Labor Day (peak season).
Eligibility
In order to be eligible to apply for a Special Event Fee Waiver Grant, the special event must have been successfully approved through its applicable approval process as outlined in the Special Event Policy Guide. Following approval of a special event, a completed Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Application is required to be submitted to the Community Resources Department at least 60 days prior to the event. Following a review to ensure the completeness of the application, the request will be included on an upcoming meeting of the Commission for its formal review and determination of grant award.
Fee waivers may be granted when the Commission determines that the event is of significant value to the community or to a significant portion of its residents and provides a measurable community benefit. In addition, the organization producing the event must meet at least 1 (one) of the following criteria:
1) An organization that has a demonstrated community benefit to Hermosa Beach. 2) Hermosa Beach business that is not delinquent on city permits or fees. 3) Organizations that are producing returning events to the City of Hermosa Beach and can demonstrate:
a. A community benefit (must complete the Community Benefit form); or b. A positive economic impact as a result of the event (must complete the Economic Impact Report with previous years’ event details).
Activities specifically prohibited from receiving a fee waiver grant include those events that:
• Promote, advocate or advance a political message or belief. • Projects or organizations who have unsatisfactorily fulfilled its obligations from previous Special Event Fee Waiver Grant awards.
Approval
The five (5) member Commission is tasked with reviewing and determining the level of Special Event Fee Waiver Grant award at one of their regular meetings held on the first Tuesday of each month beginning at 7:00pm. Consideration will include careful review of:
• Special Event Fee Waiver Grant Application.
• Community Benefit Form (if required).
• Economic Impact Report (if required).
• Successful fulfillment of previously awarded grant obligations.
In addition, the Commission will consider the following evaluation criteria:
• Whether the event serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach, its residents, schools, and/or businesses. • Whether the event delivers substantive and measurable economic and community benefits to the City. • Whether the event enhances the quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; offering recreational, cultural, social, and or and/or educational activities of interest to the community.
The Commission’s decision to deny grant funding for specific events is appealable by the City Council. The City Council will not consider additional fee waiver considerations in addition to the maximum award amounts allowable through the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant program.
Obligations
Organization receiving grant funding through the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant program will be required to complete the following:
201
15 • Submission of a Grant Final Report within 30-days following the event. • A formal presentation to the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission at one of its regular meetings no more than 60-days following the event. The presentation shall include discussion of:
o Number of attendees.
o Beneficiary of funds raised by the event (if applicable). o Overview of event budget and financial outlook.
Disqualification
Failure to complete these requirements in accordance with this policy shall automatically disqualify the organization from submitting a future request to receive a Special Event Fee Waiver Grant for the remainder of the current calendar year plus one additional year.
If any information submitted as part of the Special Event Fee Waiver Grant is found to be fraudulent, event approvals already granted for the remainder of the calendar year will be automatically revoked. While the organization will be permitted to reapply for approval of event(s) in the following calendar year, it will no longer be eligible to apply for Special Event Fee Waiver Grants.
Long-term Agreements
The City of Hermosa Beach recognizes the value in hosting a variety of beloved community events that help create a balanced and enjoyable events calendar for its residents. To support and develop a long- term approach to the scheduling of events, eligible events can qualify for a long-term agreement (LTA) with the City.
Eligibility
In order for an organization to be eligible for consideration of a long-term agreement, its event(s) must satisfactorily meet at least three of the following:
□ The event(s) must qualify as an Impact Level II or III (per the Impact Worksheet), and at least one of the following:
o Have a combined estimated total of 5,000 people in attendance; or o The event must be at least two (2) consecutive days (including setup and teardown). □ Have held its event in Hermosa Beach for at least three consecutive years and can demonstrate a positive and differentiated impact to the city including substantive and measurable economic and community benefits; □ The event must be produced by an organization that serves, involves, and/or promotes Hermosa Beach’s coastal lifestyle, its residents, schools, and/or businesses; and □ The organization or event producer must be able to demonstrate how its programs (outside of those provided at the event) provide a positive impact to the City including enhancements to quality of life to the Hermosa Beach community; or the offering of recreational, cultural, social, and/or educational activities of interest to the community.
Upon request of an organization whose event does not satisfy one or more of the above eligibility criteria, the City Council may at a regular Council meeting authorize such organization to apply for an LTA where its event provides a demonstrable or differentiated benefit to the community or a service that the City would otherwise be unable to provide.
Term Limits
LTA’s shall be for no less than two (2) years but shall not exceed a maximum of three (3) years unless otherwise determined by the City Council.
Procedures
The following steps are required to guide the development and implementation of an LTA:
1. Submittal of an LTA Application and corresponding letter to the Community Resources Department explaining the organization’s qualifications (as outlined above). 202
16 2. Review and recommendation for City Council approval by the Parks, Recreation and Community Resources Advisory Commission (Commission).
3. Review and approval by the City Council to begin LTA negotiations with Staff.
4. LTA negotiations and development.
5. Presentation of the final LTA to the City Council for approval.
Obligations
Organizations whose event(s) are approved through an LTA are required to provide a formal presentation to the Commission at one of its regular monthly meetings no more than 60-days prior AND 60-days following its event(s). The pre-event presentation shall include a general event overview including anticipated number of attendees; an overview of the event footprint and individualized setup; and its anticipated impact(s) to the community, etc. The post-event presentation shall include a general overview including the actual number of attendees; actual impact(s) to the community; and any event struggles and successes, etc.
203
204
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of January 25, 2022
DISCUSSION OF NEXT STEPS TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE
CITY’S GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GOALS
AND CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY
CHOICE AGGREGATION OPTIONS
(Environmental Programs Manager Doug Krauss)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
1. Discuss Community Choice Aggregation options as a means of reducing emissions to meet the City’s carbon neutrality goal;
2. Provide staff direction to return to Council with a fuller treatment of one or more Community Choice Aggregation options and/or authorize the City Manager to sign an authorization to proceed with Clean Power Alliance to conduct an applicant impact study for $10,000 (Attachment 5); and
3. Authorize a move to Southern California Edison’s 100 percent Green Rates for municipal facilities at an estimated annual cost of $15,000.
Executive Summary:
The City has a long history of addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, both to achieve sustainability and to lower City operational costs. PLAN Hermosa identifies the goals of reducing emissions from both municipal and community-wide operations and prescribes regular progress evaluations for measuring progress towards those goals. With this report, staff presents the established goals and presents some of the options available to make advancements towards those goals.
Background:
In 2006, the City of Hermosa Beach endorsed the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement (the “Cool Cities Program”), committing itself to aligning with the greenhouse gas emissions reductions spelled out in the Kyoto Protocol. This heralded a series of actions by the City Council to address GHG emissions reduction. These actions included development of a Sustainability Plan in 2011, and both a Carbon Neutral Scoping Plan and a Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan (Attachment 1) in 2016.
PLAN Hermosa, completed in 2017, serves as the City’s General Plan, as well as its Climate Action Plan (CAP). This plan incorporates many of these strategies and details a course of action the City City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™205
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
should take to achieve its emission-reduction goals.
The State has set goals for reducing GHG emissions through AB 32 and Executive Order (EO) S-3- 05 for local governments to achieve a 15 percent reduction below 2005 levels by 2020. PLAN Hermosa outlined the following City goals:
1. A Community emissions reduction target of at least 66 percent reduction below 2005 levels by 2040; and
2. A Municipal emission reduction target that meets or exceeds 80 percent below 2005 levels by 2030.
Municipal emissions result from City-owned facilities and operations, while community emissions result from all the privately-owned facilities and activities in the City including residential and commercial. Understandably, the City has greater control over municipal emissions, while community emissions represent a much greater amount of emissions from a more complex mix of sources.
PLAN Hermosa also requires the City evaluate its progress at five-year intervals and take corrective action as needed to stay on track to meet its municipal emissions reduction goals. Inventories of municipal and community emissions were performed in 2015 by the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) comparing the years 2005 and 2012 (Attachment 2). These inventories show the following progress towards the City’s goals:
· The community of Hermosa Beach decreased emissions 7.7 percent from 2005 to 2012, from 137,160 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) to 126,611 MTCO2e; · Under the Adjusted Business-as-Usual (BAU) forecast, community emissions will be 111,690 MTCO2e in 2020 and 94,162 MTCO2e in 2035. These emissions levels are 19 percent lower in 2020 than 2005 and 31 percent lower than 2005 by 2035; and · Municipal emissions have decreased 9 percent from 2005 to 2012, from 1,501 MTCO2e to 1,372 MTCO2e.
Since then, the City has implemented many additional emissions reductions measures. These measures include:
· Installation of additional electric vehicle chargers for both the public and for City fleet. The City now maintains 34 chargers citywide, 28 of which are for public use; · Installation of a 99 kilowatt (kW) solar photovoltaic system on the Community Center. The installation cost the City approximately $200,000, but has saved the City almost $70,000 in electricity costs to date while reducing energy use by more than half; · Retrofit of over 900 streetlights from low-pressure sodium vapor bulbs to LED technology, reducing energy consumption by approximately 360,000 kilowatt hours (kWh) over the last City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™206
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
reducing energy consumption by approximately 360,000 kilowatt hours (kWh) over the last three years; and
· The City revised its Clean Fleet policy in 2017 to align with the City’s municipal carbon neutral plan and commit to a progressive transition to zero and low-emissions vehicles and equipment.
Despite this progress, the City must do more to ensure achievement of the emissions reduction goals adopted in PLAN Hermosa. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, City staff was unable to dedicate the resources necessary to perform the anticipated 2020 assessment of progress towards municipal emissions reductions. Auspiciously, the SBCCOG has begun work on new emissions inventories for its member agencies. Expected to be completed by Summer 2022, this inventory will address community emission sources. Additional municipal inventory analysis is under discussed. These inventories should capture the reductions resulting from the major energy efficiency projects mentioned above and help further illustrate both the City’s progress and any need for further reductions.
Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
November18, 2014 Hosted Study Session and approved Feasibility Study to Explore formation of a CCA
February 24, 2015 Accepted Carbon Neutral Municipal Plan August 22, 2017 Adopted Plan Hermosa
November 6, 2021 Hosted Council Retreat to discuss emissions reductions strategies and directed staff to return to Council with CCA options and recommendations
Discussion:
At its November 6, 2021 retreat, City Council focused on the topic of City emissions reductions goals and strategies. At that meeting, there was an extensive discussion of CCA including a presentation from the Clean Power Alliance. As described in the Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan and in PLAN Hermosa, CCA is potentially one of the most impactful options the City has in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Below is a discussion of CCA, the options available to the City, and recommended next steps.
Community Choice Aggregation (CCA)
CCA was made possible in California in 2002 with the passing of AB117 (Migden). CCA provides public agencies, such as the City, the opportunity to procure their own energy for their customers-the City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™207
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
public agencies, such as the City, the opportunity to procure their own energy for their customers-the residents and businesses in their jurisdiction. CCA can purchase power and sell it to its customers, utilizing the infrastructure (poles and wires) of the existing Investor-owned Utility (IOU). In Hermosa Beach, the IOU is Southern California Edison (SCE). This results in customer bills that include both the IOUs delivery costs and the CCA’s energy (“generation”) costs. The IOU would typically continue to provide customer billing with a description of the CCA’s charges included.
One of the biggest benefits a CCA offers is the ability to control the energy portfolio. This has been used most commonly to increase the percentage of renewable energy in the portfolio compared to that currently offered by the IOUs. Another important feature of a CCA is that once a public agency chooses to form or join a CCA, every customer within the agency’s jurisdiction is automatically enrolled into the program. The agency sets a default initial renewable energy level for both its municipal accounts and all other community accounts. Customers then have the option of opting out of the CCA entirely and going back to their original IOU for energy. Customers also have the option of changing their individual renewable energy level or remaining at the original default level set by the jurisdiction. The public agency also has the option of changing its citywide default renewable energy level if necessary.
Hermosa Beach was one of the first cities in the South Bay to seriously consider the CCA model. As early as 2014, with its work on a Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan, the City identified a CCA as a viable strategy for reducing the City’s overall carbon emissions. At the time, the only established CCA in Southern California was Lancaster Choice Energy which was also the first to be formed as a standalone CCA. Most CCAs in California are formed as Joint Power Authorities (JPA) between multiple public agencies. A number of CCAs have been operating successfully in Northern California since 2010 including California’s first CCA, Marin Clean Energy.
Since these early considerations of a CCA, the City has hosted study sessions on the topic and staff has produced reports concerning the topic of CCA. At its November 10, 2015 meeting, City Council gave staff direction to pursue two avenues for implementing Community Choice Aggregation: 1) as part of the Los Angeles County JPA model (which evolved into Clean Power Alliance) and 2) as a standalone CCA in partnership with Lancaster Choice Energy (Attachment 3). At that meeting, the Council authorized a consulting agreement between Hermosa Beach and the City of Lancaster for a feasibility study and preparation of an Implementation Plan.
In June 2016, a draft technical feasibility study was completed and presented to City Council at a special study session. Following a discussion of the results, City Council directed staff to continue pursuing establishment of a City of Hermosa Beach CCA-Hermosa Beach Choice Energy (HBCE).
Council also requested information on the timing and costs associated with the Los Angeles County CCA Program.
Much of the discussion at the time centered on potential risk to the City of forming its own CCA and associated costs. Amidst this discussion, in September 2016, Council approved an Ordinance and City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™208
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
associated costs. Amidst this discussion, in September 2016, Council approved an Ordinance and associated Implementation Plan and Statement of Intent allowing for the formation of a Hermosa Beach CCA (Attachment 4). Though it was made clear by Council that this was not a commitment to form a CCA, the implementation was filed with the California Public Utilities Commission to allow the City the option to proceed with the process.
Ultimately, the City decided against forming or joining a CCA at the time. In 2017, the County’s CCA program became the Clean Power Alliance and now has 32 member agencies, including neighboring Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach.
Current CCA Options
Currently, there are three feasible options for the Hermosa Beach to become part of a CCA:
1. Form its own standalone CCA;
2. Join CalChoice, a hybrid CCA model affiliated with Lancaster Choice Energy; or
3. Join Clean Power Alliance.
There would be significant administrative and financial burdens associated with formation of a new CCA. Though all the revenue of the CCA would go directly to the City of Hermosa Beach in this scenario, so would all potential risk. Though most likely operated by contractors and consultants, City staff would be required to oversee these operations and interface between Council and the CCA.
This would require additional, specialized City staff to administer the program.
CalChoice provides a hybrid CCA option in which the City would technically have its own CCA, but would be overseen administratively by Lancaster Choice Energy. CalChoice has a team of consultants that handles administration and energy procurement for its members, and each member pays a fee for these services. The City would have total control over rate-setting, branding, billing and programs. CalChoice personnel have indicated over ongoing discussions that Hermosa Beach would likely not be a viable member for CalChoice due to the City’s small size and would instead be encouraged to partner with another larger agency to join.
Clean Power Alliance is the largest CCA in California, covering 32 agencies in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. Clean Power Alliance is a JPA and each member agency has a representative on the Board of Directors. The JPA format relieves the member agencies from any liability to their general funds. The Board of Directors determines the programs, rates, and policies of the JPA with the guidance from Clean Power Alliance staff. Current Clean Power Alliance program offerings include: solar plus clean backup power for critical member agency facilities; rebates for publicly accessible electric vehicle chargers; demand response incentives for residential and commercial smart technologies; and community solar for customers in disadvantaged communities. Clean Power Alliance handles all customer billing and administration for its members though each member’s City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™209
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
Alliance handles all customer billing and administration for its members though each member’s governing board determines its agency’s default renewable energy rates. Clean Power Alliance currently offers three energy options: Lean Power (40 percent clean energy, similar to SCE’s base product), Clean Power (50 percent clean energy), and 100 percent Green Power (100 percent renewable energy).
Based on the City’s 2016 feasibility study, as well as more current information, the table below illustrates some of the risks and benefits associated with these three CCA options:
CCA OPTION RISK AUTONOMY COST
Standalone CCAHigh–all cost and revenue
tied to General Fund
High–run entirely
by City.
High–significant initial
costs but long-term
revenue potential
Hybrid CCA–
CalChoice
High–all cost and revenue
tied to General Fund
Moderate–
CalChoice
consultants handle
admin. and
procurement
High–significant initial
costs but long-term
revenue potential.
Ongoing fees to
CalChoice
Clean Power
Alliance
Low–no connection to
General Fund. Customers
pay direct.
Low–City has one
vote on Board of
Directors
Low–after feasibility
study, no additional
costs.
The most likely risk associated with CCA is based on the potential for errors made in forecasting energy needs and costs. If Hermosa Beach had its own CCA with its own unique energy needs, forecasting and purchasing supplies would be critically important. In the CCA model, there is no real threat of outages due to underestimating energy loads, but there could be exorbitant costs associated with procuring energy in real-time in the event of an unexpected shortfall. Because the CCA would be connected to the General Fund, any potential shortfalls experienced in the standalone CCA model could impact the City’s overall budget.
Clean Power Alliance’s combination of low-risk with cooperative local control has made it a popular option among local agencies, including the neighboring cities of Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach. Clean Power Alliance is now the State’s largest CCA and is currently accepting new members. This process includes a required feasibility study at a one-time cost of $10,000. Manhattan Beach recently changed its default energy level so that now all customers are at a default level of City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™210
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
Beach recently changed its default energy level so that now all customers are at a default level of 100 percent renewable energy. Redondo Beach voted in December 2021 to change the default level for its customers to 100 percent renewable energy effective October 1, 2022. Individual customers have the option of choosing lower clean energy content or opting out of the program altogether and returning to paying SCE for both generation and delivery costs.
From 2018 through 2020, Clean Power Alliance’s rates were 1-2 percent less expensive than SCE’s for Lean Power, at parity with SCE for Clean Power, and 7-9 percent more expensive for 100 percent Green Power. In 2021, the Lean Power and Clean Power rates became more expensive than SCE due to an increase in the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) (commonly referred to as the “exit fee”) and market conditions that forced CPA to purchase system power at historically high prices. The 100 percent Green Power rate remained around the nine percent premium as falling prices for renewable energy offset the rise in system power prices. Clean Power Alliance expects that in March 2022 all three Clean Power Alliance rate products will be less expensive than SCE if the PCIA goes down and SCE generation rates go up. The Clean Power Alliance Board conducts an annual rate setting process in June, at which time the rate comparisons will likely return to levels similar to the 2018-2020 period for Lean and Clean, with a 3-4 percent premium for 100 percent Green.
In the short term, the City also has the option of subscribing to SCE’s 100 percent renewable option for its municipal accounts. This would ensure the City eliminates virtually all GHG emissions associated with energy consumption at City facilities. An initial estimate from SCE shows that this option would increase the City’s annual energy bill by approximately $11,000. The City’s annual cost may decrease or increase slightly should it later join Clean Power Alliance’s 100 percent Green Power rate for municipal facilities, depending on SCE and Clean Power Alliance 100 percent Green rates at that time.
Additional Strategies
Onsite generation of electricity is another means for the City to lower emissions and reduce its energy consumption. If the City were to procure 100 percent renewable energy, onsite generation would not contribute to GHG emissions reductions resulting from electricity use, but it could potentially offset emissions from other sources that cannot be easily made carbon neutral (e.g., natural gas use, emissions from employee commuting, etc.). This could also reduce energy costs and allow the possibility of contributing power back to the grid and offer some potential revenue when conditions allow.
Photovoltaic solar power systems are the most common type of onsite generation. The solar installation on the Community Center has cut offsite electricity consumption for the facility by over half. Additionally, battery storage of energy from such installations offers a way to further reduce consumption of offsite energy and develop resiliency among City facilities by providing a source of backup energy in the event of power outages, such as those expected to occur following a natural disaster-when municipal operations will be needed for emergency services. Onsite generation and City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™211
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
disaster-when municipal operations will be needed for emergency services. Onsite generation and energy efficiency improvements typically require an upfront financial commitment that is repaid over the life of the improvement. Grants are also sometimes available, particularly for multi-benefit projects, such as energy resiliency and emergency operations, that go beyond simply improving City facilities.
Energy efficiency improvements can also be made to existing facilities and equipment that reduce emissions. These include: more efficient HVAC systems, lighting retrofits, and more significant green construction practices during remodels and new builds of facilities. For instance, the City is currently working to incorporate solar panels and battery storage in the upcoming upgrades planned for the Clark Building. Another strategy to consider is revisions to building codes and policies to require more ambitious energy efficiency installations on public and private projects. For instance, Manhattan Beach recently began developing a plan to require solar panel installations on all new public and private commercial buildings. As a member agency, Hermosa Beach may be able to partner with Clean Power Alliance on these and other initiatives, leveraging Clean Power Alliance’s technical expertise, industry relationships and collective purchasing power.
Next Steps
Staff recommends City Council determine whether to renew its pursuit of CCA. As mentioned above and discussed at the recent City Council retreat, Clean Power Alliance is now accepting new member agencies. The process of joining the Clean Power Alliance includes a $10,000 one-time cost for Clean Power Alliance to develop a feasibility study that would assess the City’s current and projected power needs and help determine what additional resources Clean Power Alliance would need to secure to accommodate Hermosa Beach’s customers (Attachment 5).
Should this feasibility study support the City’s inclusion in the Clean Power Alliance, Clean Power Alliance would then discuss with the City its next steps. These would include the City Council officially declaring its interest in joining Clean Power Alliance in late 2022, adopting an ordinance to join the JPA, and then developing an outreach plan. The majority of outreach to the community and customers would be done by Clean Power Alliance itself with a goal of opting in all customers citywide in 2024.
Joining Clean Power Alliance would be the most efficient and impactful strategy for further reducing the City’s overall GHG emissions. Based on the City’s most recent emissions inventories, community energy use (residential, commercial, and municipal usages) contributes approximately 40 percent of the City’s overall GHG emissions. By switching to 100 percent renewable sources for energy (for comparison, currently SCE’s default service uses approximately 36 percent renewable energy), the City could essentially reduce its GHG emissions instantly by roughly 40 percent. This would help the City move significantly towards meeting both its municipal and community emissions goals City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™212
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
simultaneously.
In the meantime, staff recommends Council authorize the City to subscribe to SCE’s 100 percent Green Rate to ensure its municipal electricity use is carbon-neutral in the short-term while the City weighs its other long-term options. The annual premium for this service is currently estimated at approximately $11,000, but estimating $15,000 annually would allow for any potential rate variations, which cannot be accurately projected at this time.
General Plan Consistency:
This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:
Sustainability and Conservation Element
Goal 1. Hermosa Beach is a low-carbon municipal organization, reducing greenhouse gases at a rate that meets or exceeds 80% below 2005 levels by 2030.
Policy:
1.1 Low-carbon municipality. Demonstrate environmental leadership and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from municipal facilities and operations by at least 80% below 2005 levels by 2030.
Goal 2. Hermosa Beach is a low-carbon community meeting State greenhouse gas reduction goals by 2040
Policy:
2.1 State targets and goals. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions at a rate that meets longterm State targets and goals to reduce emissions by at least 66% below 2005 levels by 2040.
Fiscal Impact:
The $10,000 cost for the Clean Power Alliance feasibility study was appropriated in the 2021-22 Budget (Account # 001-1201-4251). The additional $15,000 annual cost to fund the SCE 100 percent Green Rates would be allocated between all utility accounts during the annual budget process. If approved, the transition to SCE 100 percent Green Rates would be effective March 2022, at an increased cost of approximately $5,000 for the remainder of the fiscal year. The utility accounts would be reviewed as a part of the Midyear Budget Review and any increases to current appropriations would be requested at that time. The fiscal impact of other future emissions reductions programs is unknown at this time but will be analyzed by staff as needed.
Attachments:
1. Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
2. Emissions Inventory
3. 2015 Staff Report
City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™213
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0043
4. 2016 Ordinance and Feasibility Study
5. Letter from Clean Power Alliance regarding feasibility study
6. Link to November 18, 2014 Study Session
7. Link to February 24, 2015 City Council Report
8. Link to August 22, 2017 City Council Report
9. Link to November 6, 2021 Study Session
Respectfully Submitted by: Doug Krauss, Environmental Programs Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 10 of 10 Printed on 5/24/2023 powered by Legistar™214
Hermosa Beach
Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Prepared for the City of Hermosa Beach
and the Southern California Association of Governments
January 2015
kaizenergy Prepared by Juan Matute • em: [email protected] • ph: LOCLIMATE-1 (562-546-2831)
215
Existing Actions: Page 2
Disclaimer
The following disclaimer is provided as a condition of the contract terms under which this plan was produced:
“This is a project for the City of Hermosa Beach with funding provided by the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) Sustainability Program Grants. The Sustainability Program assists Southern California cities and other organizations in evaluating planning options and stimulating development consistent with the region's Sustainable Communities Strategy. Sustainability Program Grants support visioning efforts, infill analyses, economic and policy analyses, and marketing and communication programs.
The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FT A) through the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) in accordance with the provisions under the Metropolitan Planning Program as set forth in Section 104(t) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code.
The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, DOT or the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. SCAG shall not be responsible for the City's future use or adaptation of the report.
The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG or DOT. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation.”
216
Existing Actions: Page 3
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Action Baseline...................................................................................1 Defining Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment.........................................................................6 Electricity.....................................................................................................................................29 Municipal Fleet............................................................................................................................45 Employee Commutes..................................................................................................................57 Other Emissions..........................................................................................................................66 Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets.................................................................................................69 Performance Monitoring, Costs, Transparency, and Outreach...................................................87 217
Existing Actions: Page 1
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Action Baseline
Municipal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
A recent draft update to Hermosa Beach’s greenhouse emissions inventory for municipal operations indicates that streetlights and traffic signals, vehicle fleet, and building and other electricity make up Hermosa Beach’s top three municipal emissions sources. The City’s municipal operations inventory is being updated as part of the Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan process. The 2005 inventory is compared to the draft 2012 inventory below.
Top Municipal Operations Emissions Sources in Hermosa Beach (2005 to 2012) Emissions Source/Activity (Scope) 2005 MT CO2e
(% of total)
2012 MT CO2e
(% of total)
% Change in MT
CO2e (2007-2012)
Streetlights and Traffic Signal
Electricity (2)
405 (27%) 359 (26.2%) -11.4%
Employee Commute (3) 348 (23.2%) 218 (15.9%) -37.4%
Building & Other Facility Electricity
(2)
301 (20%) 305 (22.2%) 1.3%
Vehicle Fleet (1) 227 (15.1%) 328 (23.9%) 44%
Solid Waste - Contract Services (3) 215 (14.3%) 162 (11.8%) -24.7% Total 1,501 1,372 -8.6%
Source: EECAP Final Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report. Note: Some 2005 figures in EECAP Draft inventory are inconsistent with 2005 & 2007 Inventories.
City of Hermosa Beach Actions toward Carbon Neutrality
Like many communities in California, the City of Hermosa Beach has developed a number of plans and strategies to address climate change and reduce the city’s greenhouse gas emissions. The latest effort, an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan (EECAP), has provided the City of Hermosa Beach with a foundation in development of a comprehensive Climate Action Plan (CAP) by understanding community and municipal energy use, identifying local level 218
Existing Actions: Page 2
strategies resulting in long term energy efficiency, developing implementation plans, and establishing progress reports.
In pursuit of carbon neutrality, the City of Hermosa Beach has taken progressive steps in the planning, collaborating, and goal-setting for GHG reductions. Since setting the goal of carbon neutrality, the City Council has developed or is working on community discussions, strategic plans, and updates to the General Plan in keeping with its new sustainability targets. They have contracted outside vendors to inventory municipal GHG emissions so City operations and building may become the beacon of carbon reductions for the entire community. As a result of this inventory, the City has begun specific financial and technical assessments of its energy procurement. It has also begun exploring options to reduce energy use, including park and street lighting, and minimize GHG emissions by City operations. In doing so, the City set green purchasing and fleet policy goals to allow considerations for their target reductions and initiated a preliminary review of their employee rideshare program.
The keystone of Hermosa Beach’s existing climate action planning activities is the Hermosa Beach Sustainability Plan prepared by its Green Task Force and accepted by the City Council in 2011. This prior plan is estimated to support a 25% reduction in emissions below 2005 levels by 2020.
219
Existing Actions: Page 3
Existing Plans, Measures, and Documents Related to Climate Action Title Description
Assessing Options to
Deliver Carbon
Neutral Electricity to
the City of Hermosa
Beach
A report assessing options to deliver carbon neutral electricity to the City. It focuses on Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) and SCE's version of a Green Tariff Shared Renewables (GTSR) program as solutions.
Assessment and
Planning Report for
an Energy Efficiency
Climate Action Plan
(Draft)
Describes actions that the City, the SBCCOG, and region have already taken toward the goals of reduced energy use and GHG emissions, and outlines the process for planning and
implementing new measures to continue to work toward those goals. (Prepared by SBCCOG in consultation with city)
Beacon Award
Program
Resolution to participate in recognition program “Beacon Award:
Local Leadership toward Solving Climate Change Leader
Partnership Program” run by the Institute for Local Governments.
Carbon Neutral Issue
Paper: City Council
Staff Report
The document summarizes issues and actions taken toward carbon reduction for municipal operations. (January 3, 2014) Carbon Neutral Road
Map for Municipal
Facilities &
Operations
Definitions, actions and target date for carbon neutrality.
Summary of accomplishments, 2005 baseline, Sustainability Plan Targets. (SCAG Grant).
Carbon Neutral
Scoping Plan
Provides analysis of emissions conditions by sector and identifies scenarios and options for GHG reduction to achieve carbon neutrality (GHG emissions model).
City Council Strategic
Plan
The plan sets City Council goals and action plans (5-year/current year), such as a road map to carbon neutrality.
Clean Fleet Policy
and Action Plan and
Update
City Council adopted the policy, targets, and a plan to green the City fleet.
Community Dialogue:
Decision-Making
Tool, Quality of Life,
Fiscal/Financial
A summary of the community character and what people value about the City. Provides a comparison of the City's financial/fiscal condition as compared to other peer communities. City Council incorporated Decision Making Tool into its Strategic Plan, 2014. 220
Existing Actions: Page 4
Title Description
Employee Commute
Survey and
Reduction Strategies
(Draft): 2013
Employee Commute
Survey.
Summary identifies strategies for the Employer Commuter Program to support the City's carbon neutrality goal.
Enterprise Energy
Management
Information System
A program designed to track electricity, natural gas, and water data in real time.
Energy Savings at a
Glance Quarterly
Report
Reports created by GSE Solutions for the SBCCOG. The reports summarize total annual energy use for all municipal facilities and energy-savings projects completed, in progress, and
planned/identified and quantify opportunities for reducing operating costs.
Energy Study Report This report, by GSE Solutions, assesses the City’s options for energy efficiency retrofits and makes recommendations to pursue the most cost-effective options through on-bill financing.
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventory:
Community-wide and
Municipal
Community and municipal GHG inventories per Local
Government Operations Protocol and International Local
Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol. The baseline year is 2005, interim year is 2007, and 1990 is the historic level.
Municipal HighEfficiency Product
Procurement Policy
Allows energy efficiency to be a consideration in purchasing.
Solar Project
Proposal
Conceptual proposal by PSOMASFMG for 2 solar sites (total system size of 176 kW-DC) with a net purchase price of $740,843 and annual O&M of $4,893 in year 1. Sites include solar energy systems mounted on carports at City Hall and Community Center.
Strategy and Steps to
Accelerate Energy
Reduction and Cost
Savings
Report includes recommendations to implement energy reduction projects for City building, park lighting, and street lighting through CIP funds and on-bill financing agreement with SCE and adoption of a Municipal High Efficiency Product Procurement Policy.
Sustainability Plan A plan of actions to reduce GHG emissions City-wide by 15% from 2005 by 2020.
221
Existing Actions: Page 5
In-Progress Plans, Measures, and Documents Related to Climate Action Title Description
Energy Element:
Climate Action Plan
The South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) is developing the EECAP, which is the electricity section of the City’s Climate Action Plan. The Energy Element will provide the foundation and framework to develop a comprehensive CAP and put the city on a measurable path toward energy and GHG emissions reductions. This report will describe actions already taken towards reducing energy use and GHG emissions. It will also provide an energy and emissions inventory, forecasts, and targets, potential measures for energy efficiency and GHG reduction, and the proposed processes for public participation, environmental review, and ongoing monitoring processes.
General Plan Update
Integrating the
Coastal Land Use
Plan Focused on
Sustainability and a
Low Carbon Future
A General Plan Update will be focused on sustainability and carbon reduction targets adopted by the City prior to or through the process.
Municipal Carbon
Neutral Plan
This plan helps the City navigate its pathway to Carbon Neutrality and ancillary benefits.
222
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 6
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Defining Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment
Determining the City’s Municipal Climate Action Goal
The Elements of a Climate Action Goal
Local governments have various options in defining their climate commitment. The time frame, magnitude, boundary, and control options are detailed in the table below. Goals with larger magnitude reductions and future years that are nearer are seen as more aggressive. For instance, an 80% reduction in emissions by 2030 is viewed as far more aggressive than an 80% reduction in emissions by 2050 or a 50% reduction in emissions by 2030.
Choices for Climate Action Goals
Goal Element Goal Choices
Time Frame Choose both:
● Base Year - typically in the past
● Future Year - the year by which the entity commits to meeting its climate commitment
Magnitude Choose an absolute or percentage reduction, relative to the base year Applicable
Boundary
Choose one depending on the type of goal:
● Organizational boundary (for entities)
● Geographic boundaries (for communities)
Control over
Emissions
Determine which emissions are within and outside of control:
● Direct & indirect emissions (scopes 1 through 3, for entities) ● Activities & sources (communities)
Note: Communities and entities will typically use a greenhouse gas accounting protocol to aid in identifying applicable boundaries and control over emissions.
Most goals follow the following format: an X% reduction in boundary-wide greenhouse gas emissions versus Base Year levels by the future year. For example, California’s greenhouse gas reduction goal is to achieve 1990 levels in statewide emissions by 2020. This is a 0% reduction in all statewide emissions (adjusting for electricity imports) versus 1990 levels by 2020.
The most common local climate commitment is the U.S. Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement.
Mayors from the 1,060 cities that have signed onto the agreement indicated their City’s 223
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 7
commitment to “strive to meet or exceed Kyoto Protocol targets for reducing global warming pollution by taking actions in our own operations and communities.” Kyoto targets were 7% below 1990 levels by 2012. Former Hermosa Beach Mayor Sam Edgerton III signed onto this agreement.
In commissioning this Carbon Neutral Plan for Municipal Operations, Hermosa Beach wishes to explore the feasibility of a 100% reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions. While this determines the magnitude, the City has yet to determine the future year, boundary, and control over emissions. The base year becomes important if Hermosa Beach seeks to go beyond carbon neutrality by offsetting additional emissions to become “climate positive” or “carbon negative”.
Defining the “Carbon Neutral” goal for Municipal Operations In pursuing carbon neutral municipal operations, Hermosa Beach is striving for a 100% reduction in emissions from local government operations. The key remaining decisions are:
● Determining the future year by which Hermosa Beach plans to achieve carbon neutrality. ● Deciding which local government emissions are subject to the goal. ● Deciding whether to set a goal for “gross” emissions in addition to net emissions. Gross emissions are subtotals before any use of offsets.
In determining the future year, Hermosa Beach must balance its desire to be a state, national, or international climate action leader with a desire to make pursuit of carbon neutrality as costeffective as possible.
Prior work on greenhouse gas accounting for local governments and prior actions by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) have largely determined which emissions should be subject to Hermosa Beach’s goal. An understanding of these accounting procedures and consideration of the boundary and control decisions made by other cities are useful in determining which emissions the City should seek to neutralize.
Accounting Standards for Local Government Operations
The California Air Resources Board recommends that municipalities that seek to inventory their entity’s emissions use the Local Government Operations Protocol, which it helped develop.
The Local Government Operations Protocol provides specific guidance for accounting and reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions throughout North America, with additional guidance for California. The Local Government Operations Protocol is based on the North America-specific General Reporting Protocol, published by The Climate Registry. Forty-one US States have declared The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol as their preferred greenhouse gas emissions accounting and reporting guidance. The General Reporting Protocol is based on the 224
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 8
worldwide Corporate Standard, jointly published by the World Business Council on Sustainable Development and the World Resources Institute.
All three documents are used for entity-based greenhouse gas emissions accounting and reporting. Entity-based accounting differs from geographic-based accounting and reporting, which is used to account for and report emissions from the community, a state, or a nation. The U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories are two commonly-accepted guidance documents for geographic-based accounting.
Both entity-based and geographic-based accounting and reporting guidance require an inventory to include gross emissions totals before adjusting for any offsets. Offsets and the inventory’s gross emissions after adjusting for offsets are included as an informational item.
Looking at requirements for state agencies may shed light on what accounting procedures local governments would need to use should the state one day mandate greenhouse gas reductions from local government operations. California Law requires state agencies that are members of the Climate Action Team to estimate their greenhouse gas emissions from their operations. An Executive Order (B-18-12) requires all other state agencies to prepare an annual inventory. The guidance to state agencies dictates that inventories should be conducted using protocols established by The Climate Registry, which includes the Local Government Operations Protocol.
The following cities in Los Angeles County are members of The Climate Registry: Lomita, Long Beach, Santa Monica, and Vernon. Only Vernon has reported a third-party verified GHG inventory to The Climate Registry. Los Angeles County is also a member of The Climate Registry. The 2005 and 2007 municipal inventories and current draft of the City of Hermosa Beach GHG Inventory, Forecasting, Target-Setting Report for an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan also uses the Local Government Operations Protocol. ➤
➣
➢
Because the Local Government Operations Protocol is currently recommended and is the most likely candidate if municipal accounting and reporting were ever made compulsory, Hermosa Beach should use this protocol to determine which local government operations emissions are subject to its carbon neutrality goal.
Defining Organizational Boundaries for the Local Government Organization Each of the three entity-based reporting standards discussed earlier allows entities the option of reporting emissions using operational control or financial control. 225
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 9
● Operational Control: Occurs when an entity wholly owns the operation, facility, or source, or when it has the full authority to introduce and implement operational and health, safety, and environmental policies (including both GHG- and non-GHG-related policies). ● Financial Control: Occurs when a local government wholly owns an operation, facility, or source, or is a majority partner in a joint venture. A local government may own an asset (e.g. a transit bus), but not maintain operational control (e.g. transit operations and maintenance are contracted out).
Because of the unique nature of local governments, the Local Government Operations Protocol “strongly encourages local governments to utilize operational control when defining their organizational boundary.” In addition, the Local Government Operations Protocol makes several reporting recommendations for jointly-controlled operations, sources, or facilities.
Organizational Boundaries for Local Governments
Structure Reporting Recommendation in Local Government Operations Protocol
Joint Powers Authority
(JPA)
A JPA is considered a distinct entity; a local government should not report emissions from a JPA of which it is a member.
Special Districts Special Districts are considered distinct entities; however, a local government may optionally report as scope 3 those emissions which are attributable to the local government (e.g. emissions at a special district operated landfill attributable to the municipal government’s waste)
Community Choice
Aggregation
Community Choice Aggregation is a distinct entity when
implemented through a Joint Powers Authority; a local government should not report emissions from community electricity used through a CCA. The local government should report emissions from municipal electricity procured via a CCA.
➤
➣
➢
Hermosa Beach should use operational control to define its organization for purposes of GHG emissions accounting and reporting. Scope 3 emissions from special districts can be incorporated on a case-by-case basis, as determined by the relevancy of emissions to municipal operations.
Determining Appropriate Emissions within the Municipal Operations Boundary To become carbon neutral, Hermosa Beach would have to reduce or offset emissions from all sectors, activities, and sources for which it reports emissions. The Local Government Operations Protocol suggests that municipalities report scope 1 and 2 emissions over which they have operational control from the following 11 sectors:
226
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 10
Local Government Operations Protocol Sectors and Reporting Recommendations for Hermosa Beach
Sector Operational Control in Hermosa Beach Recommendation Buildings and other
facilities
✔ Operational control over City-owned
buildings.
Report these
emissions.
Streetlights and
traffic signals
✔ Operational control over City-owned
streetlights.
✘ Limited or no operational control of
streetlights provided by Southern
California Edison.
Report these
emissions, including
emissions from
SCE-owned street
lighting.
Water delivery
facilities
✘ No operational control:
○ Water is imported, recycled, treated,
and supplied by West Basin
Municipal Water District.
○ Water is delivered by California Water
Service Company (Rancho
Dominguez/Hermosa-Redondo).
Consider reporting
emissions from
water distribution.
Port facilities ✘ No port facilities. Do not report.
Airport facilities ✘ No airport facilities. Do not report.
Vehicle fleet ✔ Owned municipal vehicle fleet Report these emissions
Transit fleet ✘ No operational control.
Hermosa Beach is served by Beach Cities
Transit (controlled by Redondo Beach,
operated by Transportation Concepts), the
Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority Lines 130 & 232,
(operated by MV Transportation), Los
Angeles Department of Transportation
Commuter Express Route 438 (operated
by MV Transportation).
Consider these
emissions as an
informational item.
Power generation
facilities
✘ Service provided by Southern California
Edison.
Emissions reported
in other sectors as
scope 2.
227
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 11
Sector Operational Control in Hermosa Beach Recommendation Solid waste facilities ✔ Operational control via contracting.
Athens Services provides haulage and
sorting, landfills are owned by a third
party.
Report communitywide collection and
haulage emissions.
Report landfill
emissions from
waste generated by
municipal
operations.
Wastewater facilities ✘ Services provided by the Southern California Sanitation Control District /
South Bay Cities District.
Consider these
emissions as an
informational item.
Other process &
fugitive emissions
These are cross-sectoral emissions. Report fugitive
emissions of
common high-GWP
gases (refrigerants
and fire suppression
systems) over which
the City has
operational control
Other special districts of which Hermosa
Beach is a part
These sectors are not included in the Local
Government Operations Protocol
Flood Control Los Angeles Flood Control District Do not report.
Vector Control Los Angeles County West Vector & VectorBorne Control District Do not report.
Community Health
District
Beach Cities Health District - preventative
healthcare for the residents of Hermosa,
Manhattan, and Redondo Beach.
Do not report.
Emissions from transit and wastewater are not currently included in Hermosa Beach’s greenhouse gas inventory. We recommend they are included as an informational item because these services are provided in Hermosa Beach, but by other local government entities.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scopes & Biogenic Emissions
Entity-based accounting guidance also classifies emissions into three scopes depending on the operational control possessed over the emissions. Hermosa Beach should report and neutralize all scope 1 and scope 2 emissions, and certain scope 3 emissions. 228
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 12
Emissions Scopes and Local Government Protocol Reporting Requirements Emissions Scope Reporting Recommendation for Selected Sectors 1 - Direct Emissions Include per Local Government Operations Protocol 2 - Indirect Emissions from
Imported Energy, Steam, &
Cooling
Include per Local Government Operations Protocol
3 - Other Indirect Emissions Optional per Local Government Operations Protocol Hermosa Beach should include emissions from:
● waste generated by government operations, but
disposed of outside its organizational boundary;
● emissions from employee commuting; and
● emissions from employee business travel (not
currently included in the City’s municipal
inventories).
Hermosa Beach should consider including:
● upstream life-cycle emissions from goods and
services consumed by Hermosa’s municipal
government.
Anthropogenic versus Biogenic Emissions
Anthropogenic sources represent new greenhouse gas emissions, above and beyond the atmospheric carbon balance that existed before industrialization and use of fossil fuels. Much of the carbon emitted is new atmospheric carbon, formerly trapped underground.
Biogenic or non-anthropogenic sources are considered part of the carbon cycle or result from emissions not caused by humans. Because of this difference, greenhouse gas reporting guidelines differentiate between biogenic and anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gas emissions, reducing gross or net inventory figures by biogenic emissions totals. Biogenic CO2 emissions from the combustion of biomass should be quantified and reported as an informational item rather than as part of scope 1 emissions.
Climate Action Goals by Other Cities
This section examines the context for Hermosa Beach’s climate commitment by looking at aggressive local government goals for both the community and municipal operations. In general, cities have set and pursued aggressive climate action goals because of internal pressure to take action to mitigate climate change and provide an example to others rather than to capitalize on any economic benefits that may accrue to climate action leaders. 229
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 13
Hermosa Beach seeks a reputation as a prominent local climate action leader. While the City’s position in California gives it clear guidance on choosing the minimum set of emissions which it should neutralize, Hermosa Beach should look to other cities’ goals and use of offsets in order to position itself as a climate action leader. When Hermosa Beach adopts and publicizes a goal, it will be compared first and foremost to current and future goals by other cities in California, followed by cities elsewhere in the U.S. Less weight will likely be placed on comparing goals set by Hermosa with those of major world cities.
Cities in California
Davis: Carbon Neutral Community by 2050
In 2008, the City of Davis adopted, by resolution, GHG targets for community and municipal operations that put the City on a path toward carbon neutrality by 2050, with average reductions of 2.6% per year between 2015 and 2040. Davis plans to use offsets to neutralize emissions it cannot reduce on its own.
Davis uses the Local Government Operations Protocol to account and report municipal emissions and the U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for community emissions. Within its inventory, Davis includes its vehicle fleet, special equipment, refrigerant leakage, natural gas and facility emissions, electricity (buildings, streetlights, traffic lights, and water & wastewater conveyance), as well as direct emissions from treating and processing water and wastewater. In 2010, Davis adopted its Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, which details the City’s past and future climate actions.
The City of Davis reported verified emissions to The Climate Registry for calendar years 2009 and 2010.
Berkeley: Reductions by Popular Demand
In 2006, the voters of the City of Berkeley adopted a GHG reduction target of 80% below 2000 levels by 2050. 82.3% of voters favored Measure G. The Office of Energy and Sustainable Development within the Department of Planning & Development regularly tracks community and municipal progress. Berkeley does not have a carbon neutrality goal.
Palo Alto: Carbon Neutral Electricity
The City of Palo Alto Utilities Electricity Supply Portfolio Carbon Neutral Plan outlines a strategy to secure long-term contracts for renewable energy, with use of RPS-eligible unbundled RECs and greenhouse gas offsets in the interim (2013-2016). In 2007, the Palo Alto City Council adopted a goal to reduce municipal and community GHG emissions 15% below 2005 levels by 2020.
230
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 14
Lancaster: “Solar Capital of the World”
The City of Lancaster’s goal is to become the Solar Capital of the World. In 2011, the City formed the Lancaster Power Authority to install solar photovoltaic arrays at local schools and to partner with private clean energy companies. On March 26, 2013, the City adopted an ordinance that required new single family homes to provide solar-generated power. In 2014, the City started Lancaster Choice Energy, a pending community choice aggregator.
The City does not have a climate action plan. In 2010, it passed a resolution asking the state to suspend AB 32.
San Francisco: A Cautionary Tale on Ephemeral Climate Goals In his January 2008 inaugural address, Mayor Gavin Newsom pledged to make the City completely carbon neutral by 2020:
“The most important step we can take is make this city completely carbon neutral, and that is exactly what we’re going to do.... Today I want to pledge to make this City -- and this, by the way this is not one of those fanciful pledges that never gets done, you can't measure, and nothing ever happens, and we come and go, and no one holds us to account. Let us pledge today -- with a specific plan that will follow -- to make San Francisco and City government carbon neutral by 2020. I think that's a fair, reasonable, as well as an audacious goal.”
The resulting plan, released later that year, contained a goal to reduce community emissions to 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2012 through implementation of reduction strategies and the use of offsets. The plan mentioned neutrality, but did not express a future year to make the goal concrete. In 2008, the City adopted an ordinance to reduce community-wide emissions 25% below 1990 levels by 2017 and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.
San Francisco failed to meet its 2012 goal for reductions in municipal greenhouse gas emissions.
Sacramento: Acting Through the General Plan
Sacramento incorporated its 2012 Climate Action Plan into its 2035 General Plan Update in 2014. The City did this to strengthen the plan’s objectives by including them as general plan policies and implementation measures. The 2014 Draft includes a general plan policy to reduce community-wide emissions 83% below 2005 levels by 2050.
The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), which provides electric service to the City and surrounding areas, maintains an offset program and offers opt-in 50% and 100% renewable options through its Greenergy product.
Neither the City nor the utility have a carbon neutral goal. 231
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 15
Santa Barbara: Concerned about the Cost of Carbon Neutrality Santa Barbara considered a municipal carbon neutral goal in 2008 through 2009, but ultimately decided against setting aggressive greenhouse gas reduction targets. According to an agenda from their March 10, 2009 meeting, “The [Finance] Committee is in favor of having City goals in this regard, but has requested additional financial information. Once the Committee receives the additional information, the Committee will review the options and return to the full Council in the near future.” No evidence in the council record suggests that the council ever reconsidered a carbon neutral goal. In Santa Barbara’s 2012 Climate Action Plan, the City adopted the standard AB 32 target of reducing community emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
Cities Elsewhere in the United States
Seattle, Washington: A Gross Emissions Reduction Goal
In 2005, municipal utility Seattle City Light became the first carbon neutral electric utility, aided by the fact that 90% of the utility’s portfolio comes from hydroelectric resources. Seattle City Light offsets the balance of emissions using offsets registered with the Climate Action Reserve and other third-party organizations.
In May 2011, the City released Getting to Zero: A Pathway to Carbon Neutral Seattle. In October 2011, the City Council adopted a resolution to set a goal of 87% gross reduction in community emissions by 2050, with the balance neutralized by offsets. The City does not have a separate target for municipal operations. In 2013, the City adopted the Seattle Climate Action Plan, which relies on a combination of pricing, transportation electrification, and integrated transportation and land use planning to move the city towards its long-term goal.
Seattle’s approach to climate action and long-term goal highlight both the urgency of the effort, but also the deliberate process in deciding to decarbonize a local economy. The City made its carbon neutral community commitment 10 years after its first notable climate action, a LEED building incentive program, and five years after its first Climate Action Plan. Control over the electric utility -- and the revenues it provides -- will undoubtedly aid the City in its pursuit.
Austin, Texas: Carbon Neutral Community by 2050; Municipality by 2020 In 2007, Austin adopted, by resolution, a goal of carbon neutral municipal operations by 2020.
The resolution included an interim goal to power all City facilities with renewable energy by 2012 (achieved), implement an ordinance to mandate zero net-energy capable1new homes by 2015, and create an interdepartmental climate action team to address emissions from the community, and a unified approach to obtain offsets for municipal and community emissions.
1 Austin defines a net-zero energy capable” homes as a home that is energy efficient enough would produce as much energy as it uses if it were to have a reasonably-sized solar system on the roof 232
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 16
In 2014, Austin adopted a resolution to pursue community carbon neutrality by 2050, which reiterated the City’s 2020 goal for a carbon neutral municipality.
Austin’s City Council has control over its electric utility, Austin Energy, which gives the City substantial leeway to fund and implement climate action programs. The City has its own offsets program, which prioritizes local sources of offsets. Offsets are funded by voluntary contributions from various large events in Austin, including Austin City Limits.
Boulder County and City, Colorado
Boulder County has a goal of carbon neutral municipal operations by 2020. The County plans to use offsets to achieve this goal. The County’s stated goal in its 2012 Environmental Sustainability Plan is to “Achieve carbon neutrality and become more resilient to the potential effects of climate change.” The County adopted this goal before the County and other parts of Colorado experienced a once-in-a-century flood in September 2013, which were seen as a potential symptom of climate change.
The City of Boulder’s years of consideration provide an example of a thoughtful, deliberative approach to making long-term climate commitments. The City discussed three climate commitment goals in a council study session on July 30, 2013, following four shorter study sessions in 2013. They are summarized below:
● Realizing that aggressive climate action efforts must span City departments, Boulder has an integrated approach at the top level of administration and policy-making (city manager and general plan level). Boulder also found it important to develop a short-term goal in addition to its long term goal, as this would solidify early actions rather than approaching “analysis paralysis” in determining the ordering of actions towards the longterm goal. As a key part of its efforts to build climate change information into decisionmaking, Boulder strives to create a more robust and dynamic data management and performance system for monitoring progress.
● Key points of the climate commitment are:
○ Seven Core Principles: be strategic, yet opportunistic; take calculated risks; avoid analysis paralysis; partner with other agencies, nonprofits, and businesses; demonstrate ethical leadership; focus on system change; and harness the economic benefits of climate leadership.
○ Six Pillars of Action: “ramp up renewables”, “better buildings” (efficiency and resilience), “travel wise” (sustainable transportation), “waste not” (materials & resource recovery), and “every drop” (conserve water)
○ Five Elements: goal setting, defining targets, strategy development, monitoring and reporting, and community & partner engagement.
233
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 17
Three Goals
The City of Boulder explored 3 community-wide goals for carbon neutrality, from least to most aggressive:
1. An 80% reduction in emissions by 2050 (ultimately selected)
2. Carbon neutral by 2050
3. Carbon neutral by 2030 (determined to be too aggressive) Staff ultimately decided to recommend the Council consider the first two goals, as the third option would require immediate, drastic reductions (25% per year). The Council ultimately decided on Option 1: an 80% reduction in community-wide emissions by 2020.
While some council members sought the stronger goal, the Council ultimately decided that they would revisit the goal in a few years. A comment from Councilmember Macon Cowles captured the sentiment of the majority: “I don’t look at this as an endpoint but as an aggressive goal...that we can revisit again in a couple of years... With this goal (option one), I think that we can do this. But the times are uncertain....Let’s make sure we can do this and that we do this.” (3:42:03 in video).
City of Boulder’s financial resources for climate action In 2006, Boulder’s voters passed a Climate Action Plan tax as a surcharge on electric utility bills. Voters extended the measure in 2012. Boulder is served by an investor-owned utility, Xcel Energy. The tax, similar to California’s Utility Users Tax, provides the City with an opportunity to collect revenues based on electricity usage. Per-kWh rates are $0.0049 for residential, $0.0009 for commercial, and $0.0003 for industrial customers. The tax generates around $1.8 million per year and funds personnel, energy audits, rebates and incentives, and public education programs.
Next Steps
The July 30th council discussion provided direction for staff, but did not formalize the City’s climate commitment. As of September 2014, Boulder has not yet adopted a target via resolution or ordinance.
The City of Boulder and Hermosa Beach are both working with the Brendle Group on climate action strategy. The Brendle Group conducted much of the background research for the City’s climate commitment study.
South Miami, Florida
In 2009, the City adopted a resolution and work plan committing to carbon neutrality by 2030.
The resolution applies only to municipal operations.
234
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 18
Cambridge, Maryland
Cambridge has a “getting to zero” task force scoping options to become a “net zero community.” This term is not defined, but the task force is focused on reducing carbon emissions from building operations.
Cities Outside of the United States
British Columbia, Canada
British Columbia is globally unique due to its low-per capita emissions, pervasive local government climate commitments, and high price of carbon. The province has high utilization of emissions-free energy, since BC Hydro gets more than 90% of its power from hydroelectricity and other clean energy sources. Many British Columbia Municipalities have signed on to the British Columbia Climate Action Charter and have made a commitment to carbon neutral operations by 2012. British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax reached its full phase-in value of $30 per metric ton during 2012.
In measuring municipal carbon neutrality goals, British Columbia considers core services, whether provided directly or contracted. It also considers fuel and energy used for vehicles, facilities, machinery, and equipment (whether or not they are owned or leased). Excluded are non-core services such as airports, janitorial services, staff commuting and travel, and construction emissions. Offsets are used to neutralize gross greenhouse gas emissions. Their use - and controversy - are covered in the discussion of offsets later in this chapter.
Aarhus, Denmark
Aarhus is the central city of a region of about 1,250,000 people. In 2008, the City Council adopted a goal for the community to be CO2-neutral by 2030. The implementation plan does not include a discussion of offsets.
Copenhagen, Denmark
Copenhagen has a comprehensive plan to achieve community carbon neutrality by 2025. The City plans to implement aggressive energy efficiency measures, and will offset any remaining emissions via surplus renewable energy generation.
Malmö, Sweden
Across the Sound from Copenhagen, Malmö is a city with a population of about 300,000. In 2009, the City set a community-wide goal to be “climate neutral” by 2020 (by using offsets) and run on 100% renewable energy by 2030. The City plans to reduce gross emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2020.
Melbourne, Australia
In 2002, the City adopted a goal of carbon neutral municipal operations by 2020. In 2013, Melbourne verified its carbon neutral municipal operations status through an independent audit.
The City used offsets to achieve this goal: investments in an Indonesian clean energy plant. 235
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 19
The City hopes that its central business district and surrounding areas will be carbon neutral by 2020.
Climate Commitments by Entities Other Than Local
Governments
As carbon neutral commitments are relatively uncommon among local governments, climate commitments from other entities -- specifically universities, but also corporations -- are relevant to Hermosa Beach’s decision-making. More similarities exist between local government and universities than with corporations. Similarities between local governments and higher educational institutions include: close ties between an individual’s identity and the institution and place, 24-hour communities with residential life, and the role of competing missions and priorities in considering climate commitments and action.
Colleges and Universities
The American College and University President’s Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) is a national climate commitment registry and information-sharing network designed to enhance the credibility and success of college and university climate goals. As many colleges and universities are on the leading edge of climate action, the ACUPCC effort is the most mature climate commitment effort in the U.S. The effort’s commitment requirements and support structure can provide an example for municipalities.
Signatories agree to: (1) complete an emissions inventory; (2) set a target date and interim milestones to become climate neutral; (3) immediately implement short-term actions to reduce GHGs; (4) integrate sustainability into the curriculum; and (5) submit the action plan, inventory, and progress reports to the network.
ACUPCC provides membership-based guidance and technical support, much as ICLEI provides for local governments. Annual dues vary from $750 to $4,000 for a basic membership based on the institution’s size.
As of September 2014, ACUPCC has 684 signatories, 73 of which are in California. 236
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 20
Southern California Signatories of the American College and University President’s Climate Commitment:
Anaheim University
Antioch Los Angeles
CSU Pomona
CSU Fullerton
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
Chaffey College
Claremont McKenna College
East Los Angeles College
Harvey Mudd College
Los Angeles City College
Los Angeles Harbor College
Los Angeles Mission College
Los Angeles Pierce College
Los Angeles Southwest College
Los Angeles Trade-Technical
College
Los Angeles Valley College
Loyola Marymount University
Pasadena City College
Pitzer College
Pomona College
Santa Monica College
UC Irvine
UC Los Angeles
UC Riverside
University of La Verne
University of Redlands
West Los Angeles College
West Valley College
Defining Carbon Neutrality for Colleges and Universities The ACUPCC defines carbon neutrality as “having no net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to be achieved by eliminating net GHG emissions, or by minimizing GHG emissions as much as possible, and using carbon offsets or other measures to mitigate the remaining emissions.” At a minimum, institutions must report scope 1 (direct) emissions produced through campus activities; scope 2 (indirect-energy) emissions from purchased energy; and scope 3 (indirect) emissions from student, faculty, & staff commuting and institution-funded air travel. ACUPCC recommends (but does not require) that universities evaluate upstream (scope 3) emissions in purchased goods and services.
ACUPCC requires use of an accounting method consistent with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol of the World Business Council on Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute.
Both The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol and its derivative for municipalities, the Local Government Operation Protocol, are consistent.
The ACUPCC has provided a commonly-accepted standard for college and university climate commitments. Because carbon neutral commitments are relatively rare for U.S. local governments, no equivalent commonly-accepted standard exists. This signals a leadership opportunity for Hermosa Beach and other cities considering carbon neutrality goals in the coming years.
Future Year for College and University Climate Commitments The most common horizon year for college and university carbon neutrality goals is 2050. A few universities have set - and achieved - neutrality goals with horizon years prior to 2014. A discussion of their efforts and use of offsets follows in this chapter. 237
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 21
A Closer Look at University of California’s Climate Commitment The University of California hopes to be the first research university system to achieve carbon neutrality by 2025. Although the goal has been discussed publicly by the Regents and President Janet Napolitano, it has not been formally adopted as a UC Policy. Existing climate goals are measured against emissions scopes 1, 2, and select scope 3 (student, staff, and faculty commutes and university-funded air travel). In 2011, the Regents discussed a carbon neutrality commitment, stating that while reductions in gross emissions were preferred, offsets would be required. In order to keep funds within the UC system, the Regents discussed developing a UC offset fund.
Corporate Climate Goals
In 2014, Ceres, a non-profit organization dedicated to sustainable investment and business, released a report of corporate greenhouse gas goals for Fortune 500 companies using information from the CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project). A total of 53 Fortune 100 companies reported target data to the CDP.
238
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 22
Notable Climate Goals of Fortune 500 Companies
Fortune 500 Company (rank) Sector Gross Emissions Goal (before offsets) Walmart Stores (1) Retail 30% reduction in GHG-intensity per square foot from 2010 levels by 2020.
General Electric (8) Industrials /
Financials
25% reduction in scope 1 & 2 emissions from
2004 levels by 2015.
JP Morgan Chase (18) Financials 40% reduction in scope 1 & 2 emissions from 2005 levels by 2020.
Wells Fargo & Company (25) Financials 35% reduction in scope 1, 2, & 3 emissions from 2008 levels by 2020.
Microsoft (35) Information
Technology
Carbon neutral by 2013. Uses an internal
carbon fee to allocate resources.
Goldman Sachs (68) Financials Carbon neutral for offices and data centers by 2020.
Nike (126) Apparel Carbon neutral facilities by 2015.
Excelon (129) Utility eliminate 17.5 million metric tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year by 2020
Kohls (148) Retail Carbon neutrality goal, 2009 through 2015.
Mattel (395)
based in South Bay
Consumer Reduce emissions per unit of revenue 50% from
2008 levels by 2020.
Many companies have backed off carbon neutrality claims that they made in the mid 2000s.
Yahoo, Nike, Pepsi, and Dell are examples. Dell achieved carbon neutral status in 2008, but backed off after a Wall Street Journal article criticized their lack of transparency and exception of supply-chain emissions.
The shoeware and apparel company Timberland set a goal in 2005 to be carbon neutral by 2010. By 2010, they had reduced 38% of emissions and offset the remaining 62%. Timberland continues to report annual emissions, though it estimates that 96% of life-cycle emissions associated with its products are outside of corporate control. The company continues to have a goal of a 50% reduction in 2006 levels by 2015. VF Corporation bought Timberland in 2011.
The change in ownership highlights that decision-maker priorities can change over time.
Defining Climate Goals for Hermosa Beach
The validity of climate action and renewable energy claims is complicated by California’s Capand-Trade and Renewable Portfolio Standard programs. The climate action and renewable 239
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 23
energy goals presented in this section are not mutually exclusive: the concurrent pursuit of multiple goals is possible, and some goals are inclusive within others. It’s possible for the City to pursue multiple goals, and achieve some goals along the way towards others.
Summary of Possible Goals for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Goal What it means for municipal
operations
What it means for the
community
Zero Emissions Zero gross scope 1, 2, and select
scope 3 emissions attributable to
municipal operations, before
accounting for offsets and RECs.
Zero gross greenhouse gas
emissions from emissionsgenerating activities or emissions sources attributable to the
community, before accounting for
offsets and RECs.
Carbon Neutral A zero balance of net emissions on
a municipal greenhouse gas
inventory after accounting for offsets
and RECs.
A zero balance of net emissions
on a municipal greenhouse gas
inventory after accounting for
offsets and RECs.
Carbon Negative A real, additional, and verifiable
reduction in California (and global)
greenhouse gas emissions
equivalent to some base year
emissions (e.g. Hermosa Beach’s
2005 or 2012 municipal inventory).
A real, additional, and verifiable
reduction in California (and global)
greenhouse gas emissions
equivalent to a community
baseline.
240
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 24
Possible Goals for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions
Zero Emissions
Zero Emissions means zero gross emissions, even before accounting for adjustments that appear as informational items on a greenhouse gas inventory, such as use of offsets and Renewable Energy Certificates. Zero Emissions is the strictest definition of carbon neutrality and the most difficult to achieve. Because Hermosa Beach is in California (which has a capand-trade program), achieving Zero Emissions would not lead to real, verifiable reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions (see Carbon Negative section).
Zero Emissions requires 100% participation of:
● Facilities and fleet that exclusively operate on zero-emissions electricity or renewable biofuels that emit non-anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Zero emissions renewable electricity could be produced on-site or off-site. ● Employees that either walk, bike, or take electric or biofuel-powered vehicles for commutes.
241
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 25
● Contracted service providers that exclusively use electricity or biofuels, either biodiesel or renewable natural gas.
● Use of landfills and wastewater treatment facilities that employee state-of-the-art greenhouse gas mitigation techniques.
Carbon Neutral
Carbon Neutral status results when a greenhouse gas inventory has a net zero balance after subtracting informational items such as offsets and Renewable Energy Certificates from gross emissions. Carbon Neutral status is possible with less than 100% participation of the activities outlined under Zero Emissions, plus the retirement of greenhouse gas allowances and, in certain cases, Renewable Energy Certificates.
Hermosa Beach can achieve Carbon Neutral status by retiring California-eligible greenhouse gas emissions allowances in an amount equal to its gross emissions inventory. Hermosa Beach can retire qualified renewable energy used for municipal operations through the California Air Resources Board’s Voluntary Renewable Energy Program. Hermosa Beach can also purchase and retire California-eligible offsets through direct participation in California’s carbon market or through services offered by carbon balancing firms.
Hermosa Beach can also purchase and retire greenhouse gas allowances that are not California-eligible. While non-California allowance retirement can also lead to a reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions, it will not reduce emissions in California and therefore would not meet potential future guidance from the California Air Resources Board. If the City chooses to pursue this route, Hermosa Beach should seek out high-quality offsets that are measurable, real, additional, and verifiable: typically those that are admissible to mandatory greenhouse gas reduction programs with high offset performance standards. In some cases, voluntary allowances may meet this high performance standard, such as those certified by the Climate Action Reserve, Gold Standard, and Verified Carbon Standard.
Carbon Negative
A new term to describe municipal climate action goals is needed for cities subject to a cap-andtrade program. The absolute cap on emissions in such a program means that emissions reductions attributable to activities in Hermosa Beach would be replaced by equivalent emissions from other sources outside of Hermosa Beach, but within the jurisdiction of the capand-trade program. Therefore, the overall level of greenhouse gas emissions in California (and globally) remains the same regardless of Hermosa Beach’s actions. Cap-and-trade programs allow for guaranteed reductions in program-wide greenhouse gas emissions, but negate emissions reductions from individual entity or community action. 242
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 26
Carbon Negative status means that Hermosa Beach achieves a real, additional, and verifiable reduction (or “dent”) in California and global greenhouse gas emissions. If Hermosa Beach were not located within a cap-and-trade program, achieving Zero Emissions or Carbon Neutral status would lead to a real, additional, measurable, and verifiable reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to the City’s business-as-usual baseline.
Hermosa Beach and other entities and communities can achieve Carbon Negative status by retiring greenhouse gas emissions allowances. The retirement of any amount of allowances greater than the City’s gross greenhouse gas emissions inventory allows the City to make Carbon Negative claims. However, as the City’s gross emissions decrease, the “dent” will decrease over time. Thus, the business-as-usual baseline is recommended for offset purchase and retirement targets, as this approximates the “dent” Hermosa Beach would make in global greenhouse gas emissions if it pursued aggressive climate action outside of California’s capand-trade program.
Summary of Possible Goals for Use of Renewable Energy
Goal What it means for municipal
operations
What it means for the
community
Powered by
Renewable
Energy
The municipality can validly claim
that operations are powered by
renewable energy, using Green-e
RECs to support the claim.
The community can validly claim
that it is powered by renewable
energy.
Powered by
California
Renewable
Energy
The municipal can validly claim that
operations are powered by
renewable energy delivered to
California, using direct purchases,
on-site generation, and Californiaeligible RECs to support the claim.
The community can validly claim
that operations are powered by
renewable energy delivered to
California, using direct purchases,
on-site generation, and Californiaeligible RECs to support the claim.
Powered by Renewable Energy
Using Renewable Energy Certificates certified under the Green-e program, Hermosa Beach can make claims that municipal operations are powered by renewable energy. Renewable Energy Certificates represent the environmental attributes of renewable power, and their monetary value has aided in financing additional renewable energy generation in the United States. While valid under commonly-accepted energy accounting principles, such claims may be challenged because there is no credibility that the renewable energy was delivered to California. For instance, the certificate could represent renewable energy generated at a wind farm in West Texas or North Dakota with no connection to the Southern California electricity grid. 243
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 27
Whether Hermosa Beach can take credit for an associated reduction in greenhouse gas emissions depends on a number of factors.
Under the Local Government Operations Protocol, Hermosa Beach can take emissions credit (as an informational item) for net greenhouse gas reductions in scope 2 (electricity) emissions only if the certificates come from electricity generation not delivered to California. This is somewhat counterintuitive and is due to California’s cap-and-trade program. Full details are covered in the Section on Electricity. Because California-eligible RECs are desirable for compliance with California’s mandatory Renewable Portfolio Standard, less-expensive, voluntary Green-e RECs available for purchase are not California-eligible. Within California, greenhouse gas claims made from use of non-California RECs may ultimately be seen as weak and considered the result of an accounting maneuver.
There is not yet a commonly-accepted standard for the adjusting community-wide emissions inventories for the purchase of Renewable Energy Certificates. This scenario could be applicable under a Community Choice Aggregation program.
Powered by California Renewable Energy
California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard requires 33% of statewide electricity consumption to come from qualified renewable energy sources by 2020. Because of this mandate, generation from qualified sources is at a price premium compared to non-qualified sources. Because of California’s cap-and-trade program, Hermosa Beach must take the extra step of retiring allowances through the California Air Resources Board’s Voluntary Renewable Energy Program in order to claim emissions-related benefits.
Despite being more expensive and requiring an extra step to claim greenhouse gas benefits, California Renewable Energy is likely to be perceived as the gold standard for renewable energy claims in California.
Hermosa Beach could purchase California Renewable Energy from Southern California Edison’s Green Rate Option, from a future Community Choice Aggregation program, possibly from direct access provider (through a lottery), or from on-site generation.
A Community Choice Aggregation program could offer, and Southern California Edison’s Green Rate Option will offer, California Renewable Energy.
Recommendation for Hermosa Beach
To be seen as a leader in municipal climate action, Hermosa Beach would need to commit to neutralizing emissions from municipal operations within the next 10 years. While a goal of 2025 244
Hermosa Beach’s Climate Commitment: Page 28
would still help Hermosa Beach be seen as a leader, the City should match goals set by the City of Austin and County of Boulder and commit to a 2020 goal. Committing to the same goal as other leading local governments would unambiguously establish Hermosa Beach as a climate action leader.
While many British Columbia municipalities have already achieved carbon neutral status for 2010, many have backed off the use of offsets to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions.
Hermosa Beach has an opportunity to be achieve “first-to” status for municipal operations in the United States by committing to neutralize as early as 2015.
Hermosa Beach can seek the more aggressive goals of “Carbon Negative” status and “Powered by 100% California Renewable Energy”. However, this level of climate commitment from the City is currently unnecessary for the City to be seen as a national leader. The City should re-evaluate its climate and renewable energy goals in the future if it finds itself undifferentiated in a growing pool of cities with simple “Carbon Neutral” goals, which are currently rare.
➤
➣
➢
Hermosa Beach should set a goal to become Carbon Neutral for municipal operations by the end of 2020.
245
Electricity: Page 29
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Electricity
Introduction
Municipal electricity use accounts for 43.4% of total scope 1, 2, & selected scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions reported in the City’s 2007 operations inventory.
This section of the Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan focuses on the procurement of emissions-free renewable electricity in order to make carbon neutrality claims and implement Program E5 of the City’s Sustainability Plan: Municipal Renewable Energy Generating. Efficiency efforts remain important, nonetheless, and the City should continue to pursue actions outlined in the Energy Study Report and the Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan.
The Hermosa Beach Carbon Neutral Electricity Procurement Plan explored on-site zero emissions generation, Southern California Edison’s Green Rate Option, and Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) for community electricity. In this section, we also discuss a Power Purchase Agreement, a municipal lease, Direct Access programs, and the use of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) as options. We recommend a combination of on-site generating, RECs, and pursuit of a CCA for achieving the City’s carbon neutral goals.
On-site Electricity Generation
Production Incentives for Owned Generation
California Solar Initiative
The California Solar Initiative began in 2007 to provide additional incentives for solar generation in California. When the program began in 2007, non-residential entities were eligible for a $2.40/watt incentive for installation and a $0.39/kWh incentive for energy production. The program utilizes a tiered schedule where incentives decline as more solar projects are installed.
In Southern California Edison territory, the California Solar Initiative incentive for non-residential customers, including local governments, is currently $0.20 per watt of installed capacity (step 10 is the final step for the incentive). As of July 2014, approximately 72 MW of installed capacity remains available in the program. Go Solar California maintains up-to-date information on the status of the program. The incentive for residential customers in Southern California Edison Territory has been exhausted.
246
Electricity: Page 30
The Local Government Renewable Energy Self-Generation Bill Credit Transfer The Local Government Renewable Energy Self-Generation Bill Credit Transfer allows local governments with on-site energy generation to transfer excess bill credits between accounts.
This would allow Hermosa Beach to generate excess solar power at one facility and transfer any credit to other accounts. According to CPUC Guidance, the program applies only to local government-owned systems and would not apply to a power purchase agreement.
Southern California Edison does not require transfer of the Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) produced by the generating facility, which would transfer the renewable benefits of the energy to another party. Hermosa Beach could retain these RECs to claim use of renewable energy and associated emissions benefits (if allowances are voluntarily retired) if it has no other agreement to transfer the RECs to another party.
Southern California Edison can offer up to 124.6 MW total under their bill credit transfer program. As of June 16, 2014 107.72 MW remains available. SCE charges a $500 set up fee and $30 monthly billing fee per generating account.
Other Options for Procurement of On-Site Generation
Entering into a Power Purchase Agreement or lease agreement can spread the costs of solar installation over several years, reducing the need for upfront payments. Unlike local governments, private owners of solar generating equipment can also utilize investment tax credits to reduce system cost.
Power Purchase Agreement
Under a Power Purchase Agreement, a third party owns and installs the equipment needed to generate on-site solar power, and Hermosa Beach signs a contract to purchase all power delivered by the unit at a pre-specified price per MWh. A Power Purchase Agreement can be a compelling option to pay for solar over time, and the City can negotiate the option to purchase the equipment at a substantially reduced rate at the end of the contract term.
The U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory has published a Power Purchase Agreement Checklist for Local Government. In addition, a presentation from the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources outlines the pros and cons. Among the cons are that the City would receive two electricity bills and that transaction costs for establishing the agreement may be high. Another con is that because the system would be privately owned, the city cannot participate in the Self-Generating BIll Credit Transfer, which would have allowed the city to overproduce at one site and use that energy at a site with a higher demand.
Solar Lease
A third party owns and installs the equipment needed to generate on-site solar electricity, and Hermosa Beach signs a contract to lease this equipment at a pre-specified price. Some 247
Electricity: Page 31
agreements have an option to purchase the equipment at a substantially reduced rate at the end of the lease term. One option unique to local governments is the California Lease Finance Program (CaLease). However, this program has a $500,000 minimum financing amount.
Another option is the Southern California Regional Energy Center Public Agency Master Lease, which offers a minimum loan of $250,000, but allows multiple projects to be bundled under a single loan.
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Credit for On-site Renewable Electricity Generating
California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requires utilities to procure a specified quantity of renewable electricity. The current mandate requires 33% of energy to come from renewable sources by 2020. While the use of renewable energy helps the state meet its greenhouse gas cap, additional generation or use of renewable, all else held equal, does not reduce the cap.
Any reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that come from meeting or exceeding the RPS requirement will lower an electricity utility’s compliance obligation - the allowances they must surrender each year to comply with the cap. Excess procurement will not affect the overall greenhouse gas emissions cap for California, but rather free up additional space under the cap for other sources to emit greenhouse gasses. In effect, greenhouse gas reductions that come from exceeding RPS or implementing greenhouse gas reduction measures would decrease the cost of a compliance unit. The notable exception is presented below.
Because of California’s Cap-and-Trade program, the greenhouse gas reduction benefits of renewable energy are separate from other environmental properties. As such, The National Green-e standard has special procedures for creating RECs from voluntary renewable energy generated in California. Voluntary renewable energy is electricity that is procured in excess of an entity’s compliance obligation under the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standard. This includes electricity rooftop solar projects on Hermosa Beach municipal facilities, whether owned by the City or procured through a lease or Power Purchase Agreement. Southern California Edison would not obtain RPS credit for voluntary renewable energy generated within its service territory.
California’s Voluntary Renewable Electricity Program allows for retirement of greenhouse gas allowances for renewable energy. Each year from 2015 to 2020, up to 0.25% of allowances under California’s Cap-and-Trade program will be retired through the program. Allowances are retired on a first-come, first-served basis. Hermosa Beach cannot own and sell credits produced under the Voluntary Renewable Electricity Program.
Claiming Emissions Reductions
Under The Climate Registry’s rule, retiring allowances is not necessary for Hermosa Beach to claim greenhouse gas reductions for on-site renewable energy generation. However, Hermosa 248
Electricity: Page 32
Beach’s participation in the program is necessary for it to claim that its use of renewable energy reduced greenhouse gas emissions in California.
If allowances remain in the Voluntary Renewable Energy Reserve Account after the California Air Resources Board serves all greenhouse gas allowance retirement requests, then these allowances may be auctioned. This has two implications for producing real, additional reductions to greenhouse gas emissions in California:
1. If the Reserve Account is undersubscribed, meaning that there are fewer requests for retirements than allowances available in the account, then Hermosa Beach’s participation produces real, additional reductions in statewide greenhouse gas emissions. This is because the City’s participation in VREP prevents another entity from purchasing the allowance via auction. Hermosa Beach could then claim zero-emissions electricity under the ARB’s rules.
2. If the Reserve Account would be exhausted regardless of Hermosa Beach’s participation, then Hermosa Beach’s successful retirement of allowances does allow Hermosa Beach to take credit for zero-emissions electricity under the ARB’s rules, but does not produce real, additional reductions in statewide greenhouse gas emissions.
Retiring allowances, though not required for Hermosa Beach to claim carbon neutrality under The Climate Registry rules, makes the City’s neutrality claim more robust. The City must enact and sustain greenhouse gas reduction activities that allow it to retire allowances in order to make valid Carbon Negative or Climate Positive claims.
Qualified Renewable Energy Sources
Section 95841.1 of the California Cap-and-Trade Regulation identifies general requirements to retire greenhouse gas allowances under the program:
1. The generator must be new and not have served load prior to July 1, 2005.
2. The generator of the renewable energy or RECs must be certified as RPS-eligible by the California Energy Commission or meet the design and installation programs of the Guidelines for California’s Solar Electric Incentive Programs in place at the time the system received an approved utility incentive claim. The California Energy Commission maintains a list of generators that meet RPS-eligibility requirements.
3. Voluntary renewable electricity must be directly delivered to California (PCC-1 and PCC2).
4. The REC must be generated in the same year that Hermosa Beach requests the retirement of greenhouse gas allowances through the ARB. For example, 2014 vintage RECs can only be retired as 2014 vintage greenhouse gas allowances.
5. The REC must be tracked by and retired with the Western Region Renewable Generation Information System (WREGIS) before submitting an application to the ARB for allowance retirement.
249
Electricity: Page 33
6. The ARB determines the greenhouse gas reduction that comes from a given unit of power consumption.
How to Apply
The annual application deadline for requesting the retirement of a REC(s) is July 1 of the year after the unit of renewable energy was generated. July 1, 2014 was the first deadline for parties to request retirement of allowances. As of September 2014, the California Air Resources Board reports zero retirements from the program’s account.
If Hermosa Beach generates on-site renewable energy in the future, it can apply to the program.
In order to reduce the City’s application burden, one application for multiple systems with nameplate capacities of 200 kW or less may be aggregated and submitted together.
Criteria for Siting Solar Photovoltaic Systems
Generating zero-emissions renewable electricity at locations recognizable as city facilities is an attractive option to demonstrate the city’s climate actions while reducing gross greenhouse gas emissions. The following criteria will help the City determine appropriate locations for on-site solar photovoltaic systems:
● If rooftop-mounted, the building and roof have the structural integrity to support a solar photovoltaic system.
● The host facility won’t undergo significant changes that affect the roof and photovoltaic system during the financing contract, or, if purchased, the assumed 30-year life of the solar system.
● The host facility is part of an electricity service account that has sufficient usage to size a cost-effective solar photovoltaic system. In general, larger systems have a lower cost per watt-hour of electricity, since fixed costs are defrayed over additional units of electricity. Also, in certain financing scenarios the energy must be used on-site as a bill transfer credit is not allowed under a municipal lease arrangement or power purchase agreement.
● Ideally, the solar photovoltaic system would be visible from publicly-accessible areas, allowing the photovoltaic panels to be a visible part of the city’s public education and outreach efforts.
Southern California Edison’s Green Rate Option
The Green Rate, a high-renewables content energy subscription program, will be available to ratepayers within SCE’s territory beginning January 2015. This program enables customers to participate in off-site renewable energy generation through SCE by subscribing to 50% or 100% renewable resource content for a determined price premium. We estimate the Green Rate Charge to be a 6.77 cent/kWh premium over the City’s estimated average generating charge of
7.53 cents/kWh. With a subscription to this new program, the City of Hermosa Beach could 250
Electricity: Page 34
meet their entire energy load with one hundred percent renewable energy; however this method will be far more costly than other alternatives. Also under SB 43, the founding legislation for this program, SCE is only required to offer the Green Rate until January 1, 2019. No provisions are currently established to continue the program beyond this deadline.
According to a report compiled by GSE Solutions, the City’s average annual energy usage is 1,717,582 kWh. Detailed, itemized bills provided by the City covered 1,339,598 kWh of usage, and we used the rates on those bills to estimate the annual premium for the Green Rate option.
The table below shows a comparison of the current annual total paid by the City for electricity with a standard renewables content and the projected annual price should Hermosa Beach subscribe to 100% renewable energy on the Green Rate.
Green Rate vs. Annual Total
Annual
Electricity
Use (kWh)
Estimated
Annual Green
Rate Premium
Current
Annual
Charge
Total Projected
Annual
Charges
GSE Solutions
Report
1,717,582 $116,318.09 $300,961.00 $417,279.09
Provided SCE Bills 1,339,598 $90,720.26 $264,672.61 $355,392.87
Direct Access Program
Direct Access is an electricity procurement option in California that allows certain customers to purchase their electricity directly from Electric Service Providers. Electric Service Providers are able to offer a greater variety of retail options to electricity customers, offering more competitive pricing or greater renewable energy attributes than is offered by SCE’s bundled product. Direct Access first became an option in California in 1998, but was suspended in September 2001.
Electricity customers with existing Direct Access contracts could continue. Through 2010, 7,764 GWh of annual customer load remained with the Direct Access program.
Direct Access is an extremely limited option for Hermosa Beach. New direct access connections are offered only via an annual lottery, so there is little certainty that Hermosa Beach would be able to choose this option.
Furthermore, Hermosa Beach’s annual electricity demand may be insufficient to obtain a competitive rate quote from an Electric Service Provider. Additionally, as many Electric Service Providers use unbundled RECs to offer green power, there would be no greenhouse gas reductions benefit over separately purchasing and retiring RECs. Hermosa Beach’s annual electricity demand in 2010 was under 2 GWh. Even a municipality with over ten times the 251
Electricity: Page 35
annual electricity demand (Santa Monica) found it could not obtain competitive rates from prospective Electric Service Providers for Direct Access service. The staff report at the time alleged that the City did not receive a competitive rate because the City’s 28.95 GWh in annual demand was “too small to offer significant price discounts or flexible terms over a long-term contract.”
In 2009, SB 695 re-opened Direct Access to new non-residential customers in 2010. Four phase-in periods were offered via first-come, first-served applications to allocate an additional 3,946 GWh in annual load for new Direct Access customers. In each period, there was more demand for the Direct Access than there was load available, and many potential customers were turned away. Southern California Edison’s overall Direct Access program cap is 11,710 GWh per year, about 13.5% of the utility’s 2012 load of 86,558 GWh.
Direct Access Lottery
A post phase-in enrollment process allows aspiring new direct access customers to join an annual waitlist. Waitlist applications are accepted during an annual phase-in enrollment period, the second full week of June, and new Direct Access customers are assigned via a lottery if and when existing direct access customers end their contract.
If the City wished to participate in the Direct Access lottery, it would first choose an approved Electric Service Provider.
Before the second week in June, Hermosa Beach’s selected Electric Service Provider would complete and submit a Customer Information Service Request (CISR) form to obtain the City’s energy usage and billing histories from Southern California Edison. The form requires the signature of the Hermosa Beach City Manager or another person authorized to bind the City to a financial contract. Southern California Edison must receive and approve the CISR in advance of the June enrollment period.
During the second week of June, Hermosa Beach would submit a Six-Month Advance Notice Form to switch service from Southern California Edison to its chosen Electric Service Provider.
Southern California Edison would then assign Hermosa Beach’s application a random waitlist number.
Each month, Southern California Edison will review available Direct Access and randomly select numbers from the waitlist and notify Hermosa Beach if load is available. If selected, Hermosa Beach would be allowed to switch to its preselected Electric Service Provider beginning January 1 of the following calendar year. The chosen Electric Service Provider must submit a Direct Access Service Request form in order to complete the transition. Each waitlist is for one calendar year. Hermosa Beach would need to submit a new application each June if it wished to remain on the waitlist.
252
Electricity: Page 36
Customers subscribing to a Direct Access program may be automatically enrolled in a Community Choice Aggregation program, unless they opt out.
The state maintains a list of registered Electric Service Providers, 21 of whom have agreements with Southern California Edison. Two providers are notable for Hermosa Beach’s Carbon Neutrality efforts.
1. Three Phases Renewables is a Manhattan Beach-based company that focuses on 100% renewable energy.
2. The City of Santa Monica has a Direct Access contract with Commerce Energy to provide 100% of municipal energy demand with 100% renewable power. However, due to a lapse in service, Commerce only supplies 59% of the City’s energy demand.
Community Choice Aggregation
AB 117, passed in 2002, established the legislative precedent for forming a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA). This bill enables California cities, groups of cities, or counties to supply electricity to customers within their jurisdiction. Establishment of a CCA allows the community to specifically allocate resources for electricity procurement, while the Investor Owned Utility (IOU) retains ownership of all transmission and delivery systems. Once a city or community forms a CCA, they gain autonomy over their energy sources, and are thus free to pursue specific initiatives like carbon neutral electrical generation. Community Choice Aggregators comply with California’s RPS, but they can procure renewable energy above and beyond this requirement.
The City of Hermosa Beach could utilize this procurement method in one of three ways to reach their overall goal of Carbon Neutrality. First, the City may launch its own effort to form a CCA as a single city. This method could prove cost-intensive as none of the fees or surcharges associated with the formation of this entity would be shared. Second, the City could pursue a partnership with surrounding cities, communities, or counties with similar, progressive climate goals and establish a CCA in which startup costs would be split. Finally, the City of Hermosa Beach may opt to join an already emerging or pre-existing CCA.
CCAs have garnered significant success in California since the formation and growth of Marin Clean Energy (MCE) beginning May 2010. Sonoma Clean Power soon followed this success and will provide service by the end of the 2014 calendar year. These successes in the North Bay have given rise to other efforts to form CCAs in California. Listed below is a synopsis of actions taken by California communities toward CCA formation. 253
Electricity: Page 37
Lancaster Choice Energy
Lancaster Choice Energy plans to be the next operational CCA in California. This entity plans to begin accepting Municipal enrollment in May 2015, Commercial/Industrial enrollment in November 2015, and Residential enrollment in November 2016. Lancaster Choice Energy has reached agreement with SCE as an approved Community Choice Aggregator Service and has already received accreditation on their Service Provider Application.
San Diego Energy District
The San Diego Energy District is in its beginning stages to become a CCA serving the City and County of San Diego. A Technical Feasibility Study has recently been authorized for the region.
Clean Power S.F.
Clean Power S.F. is planned to serve residential electricity customers in the City of San Francisco. Thus far, the efforts in the area to form this service have reached just short of residential service, which was expected at the end of 2013 and is currently accepting preenrollment.
East Bay Community Choice Energy
The County of Alameda has endeavored to create a CCA serving its residential electricity load excluding the City of Alameda. The Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted to launch a feasibility study in June 2014.
254
Electricity: Page 38
Summary of Current CCA Planning & Pre-operational Efforts in California CCA Current Stage
Lancaster
Choice Energy
Preoperational:
Community Choice Aggregator Service Agreement with Southern California Edison has been approved and Service Provider Application has been approved.
Service Begins:
● Municipal enrollment May 2015
● Commercial/Industrial enrollment in November 2015
● Residential enrollment by November 2016
San Francisco Preoperational (delayed):
Implementation Plan certified by CPUC and registered as a CCA. For residential customers only.
Was expected for late-2013. Pre-enrollment is open.
East Bay
Community
Choice Energy
Feasibility:
After an initial study, Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted to launch a Feasibility Study in June 2014.
San Diego
Energy District
Feasibility:
Technical Feasibility Study authorized by City of San Diego.
Contra Costa
County
Under Consideration:
Public information presentations underway
Hermosa Beach Under Consideration:
The City Council adopted a resolution to join with other cities for a feasibility study.
Humboldt
County & Arcata
Under Consideration:
Student-authored feasibility study released 2011 & 2013 from UC Davis.
San Luis Obispo
County
Under Consideration:
The County’s EnergyWise Plan suggests evaluation of a CCA.
Santa Barbara Under Consideration:
County’s emissions reduction strategy includes ‘evaluate CAA formation’ in Staff Report for Climate Action Plan, August 2014.
Yolo County,
City of Davis
Under Consideration:
Yolo Climate Action Plan requires the County to determine ‘feasibility of CCA Issue’ brought up on City Council Agenda in August 2012. 255
Electricity: Page 39
Renewable Energy Certificates
Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) can be part of a long-term or transitional strategy to incorporate renewable energy into Hermosa Beach’s electricity mix. Because California both requires utilities to procure a certain amount of renewable energy and caps greenhouse gas emissions, the rules surrounding the use of RECs for Carbon Neutrality claims is somewhat complicated. RECs do not directly translate into greenhouse gas offsets because the replacement power is not fully accounted for. However, special rules apply to convert California RECs into offsets, and commonly-accepted greenhouse gas accounting rules allow Hermosa Beach to use certain RECs to reduce gross emissions.
Accounting for Renewable Energy Purchases in the Emissions Inventory The multi-partner, sector-specific Local Government Operations Protocol and The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol provide greenhouse gas accounting and reporting guidance for cities.
Section 6.2.4 of the Local Government Operations Protocol outlines guidance for green power and renewable energy certificate purchases. In summary, the guidance suggests that local governments report “green power” or REC purchases as supplemental information in their inventory report; the purchases should not be deducted from scope 2 emissions. The reasoning behind this recommendation is that deducting this electricity use would result in double counting of the greenhouse gas benefit from renewable energy because the renewable energy is already accounted for in the electricity emissions factor. In the 2010 update, the partners that publish the protocol wrote:
“The partner organizations will continue to monitor and track the evolution of green power programs and the REC market. We hope that a broadly used, credible tracking, and retirement processes will soon be in place and that we will be able to provide better guidance to account for the GHG reductions associated with these purchases in future versions of this Protocol.”
It is Kaizenergy’s opinion that a 2013 update to the Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol provides the guidance needed for local governments to adjust scope 2 electricity consumption and emissions for REC purchases. The Local Government Operations Protocol provides sector-specific guidance for implementation of the General Reporting Protocol.
The 2013 update also provides for the use of program-specific utility emissions factors for entities that subscribe to a utility’s green power program, such as Southern California Edison’s Green Rate Option.
The 2013 update to the General Reporting Protocol also provides a method to adjust for the ownership and retirement of unbundled RECs that meet the Green-e standard. This includes 256
Electricity: Page 40
RECs from solar electric, such as concentrated solar thermal, wind, geothermal, certified lowimpact or EcoLogo hydropower, pipeline or irrigation canal turbine hydropower, and biomass (non-chemically treated woody waste, agricultural crops or waste).
Adjusting Hermosa Beach’s emissions inventory for REC purchases is simple: the City follows the same methodology as in its 2005 and 2007 municipal emissions inventories, adjusting for the emissions factor of renewable energy. Emissions are calculated by multiplying the quantity, in Megawatt-hours, of qualified, current-year RECs retired on Hermosa Beach’s behalf by the emissions factor of the renewable energy source. Some renewable energy generation projects create anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, such as additional organic material decomposition behind a hydroelectric dam. Greenhouse gas emissions from any electricity purchases not covered by retiring RECs will be calculated as usual: Megawatt-hours times the emissions factor of the source (e.g. Southern California Edison’s utility-specific emissions factor).
Nationally, the use of RECs for greenhouse gas accounting is subject to a number of rules:
● The REC must be separate from offsets. For example, offsets produced by a livestock project that captures and combusts biogenic methane must not include the carbon offsets produced by the renewable energy generation.
● RECs must be of near-similar vintage to the inventory year they will be used to offset electricity purchases. REC accounting standards allow some leeway: RECs can be produced up to six months before or three months after the period covered by the inventory (typically a calendar year).
● To ensure that RECs lead to the creation of new renewable energy generation, they must come from facilities that began operations fewer than 15 years before the inventory year.
The California policy environment creates two additional requirements for RECs:
● RECs must include all renewable and environmental attributes associated with the production of renewable energy. In California, this means that the greenhouse gas benefits of renewable energy production must be retired through the Air Resources Board’s Voluntary Renewable Electricity Program
● RECs must be surplus to regulatory requirements. That is, they must be produced above and beyond what’s needed to comply with California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard.
According to The Climate Registry, RECs bearing the Green-e Energy and EcoLogo tags will meet the national and California requirements. RECs from energy not delivered to California do not require allowance retirement in order to be Green-e eligible.
Green-e Renewable Energy Certificates Requirements for California’s Cap and Trade System Green-e standards require the full greenhouse gas reduction benefits be included with the REC.
This creates special procedures for renewable energy delivered to areas where greenhouse gas 257
Electricity: Page 41
emissions are capped, such as California. Green-e standards require RECs created by energy generated in or delivered to California (PCC 1 and PCC2) to have their associated greenhouse gas benefit retired through allowances, procured either through the Voluntary Renewable Energy Program or purchased through other means.
California Renewable Energy Certificates
California Law defines RECs as "a certificate of proof, issued through the accounting system established by the Energy Commission… that one unit of electricity was generated and delivered by an eligible renewable energy resource.” This includes “all renewable and environmental attributes associated with the production of electricity from the eligible renewable energy resource, except for an emissions reduction credit issued pursuant to [California’s Capand-Trade Program] and any credits or payments associated with the reduction of solid waste and treatment benefits created by the utilization of biomass or biogas fuels.” In the table below, each renewable energy classification is presented with procurement options and whether Hermosa Beach could make valid Carbon Neutrality claims under the Air Resources Board (ARB) accounting regulations or The Climate Registry’s (TCR) accounting guidance.
258
Electricity: Page 42
Categories of California Renewable Energy
Renewable
Energy
Classification
Description Cost
Premium
($/MWh
over grid
power)
Procurement
Options
Carbon
Neutrality
Claims*
PCC 1 Renewable electricity
generated in or near
California, with arrangements
to deliver the power to
California.
$10-$30 DA, CCA ARB, TCR
(with
allowance
retirement)
PCC 2 Renewable electricity
generated outside of
California, bundled with
environmental attributes, but
without arrangements to
deliver the power to California.
$5-$25 DA, CCA ?, TCR
(with
allowance
retirement)
PCC 3 The unbundled (separate from
electricity) environmental
attributes of renewable energy
generated outside of
California.
$1-$10 REC, DA, CCA TCR (if
Green-e
certified)
Green-e
Renewable
Energy
Certificate
The unbundled environmental
attributes of renewable
energy, generated outside of
California.
$1-$5 REC, CCA TCR
California
Green-e REC
A Green-e REC from a
qualifying PCC 1 or 2 facility
with retired CA-eligible CO2
allowance.
$5-$30 REC, CCA ARB, TCR
*for zero-emissions renewable generation. Not all renewable generation is zero non-biogenic emissions (e.g. biomass processes that require electricity). Cost estimates are for 2013 from Table 6 of Palo Alto’s Electricity Supply Portfolio Carbon Neutral Plan.
Marin Clean Energy use of Renewable Energy Certificates Many CCA Programs, utility green power purchase programs, and Direct Access providers make use of RECs in order to offer “green” power. Marin Clean Energy uses a mix of California RPS energy and Green-e RECs for its product. According to their 2013 Integrated Resources Plan:
259
Electricity: Page 43
“MEA is largely resourced for the next several years, having contracted for most of its projected needs for bundled renewable energy through 2017, non-renewable energy through 2017 and capacity through 2015. However, MEA has a short term need for bundled renewable energy in 2014 (PCC1) and a longer term need beginning in 2017 (PCC1 and PCC2). MEA also has a need for capacity purchases to meet resource adequacy obligations beginning in 2015.
...
The majority of MEA’s voluntary renewable energy purchases (those in excess of RPSeligible purchases) are under contract through the end of 2013. MEA has a need for renewable energy certificates in 2014 and beyond to support RPS compliance (PCC3) and voluntary renewable energy targets (Green-e). MEA also has a need for carbon neutral energy in 2014 and beyond to support voluntary GHG emissions targets.
In 2013, MCE offered 60% renewable or zero emissions energy. Twenty-seven percent of its total load came from RPS-eligible generation. The balance is met with Green-e certified REC purchases.”
The graphic below highlights Marin Clean Energy’s plan to use bundled and bundled RECs in order to offer its renewable energy programs.
Marin Clean Energy Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy, 2013 to 2022 260
Electricity: Page 44
Recommendations
First and foremost, the City should continue and expand upon existing energy efficiency programs. As the GSE Solutions report indicates, the City has opportunities to improve building energy efficiency by 40% or more. The City should pursue Projects 1 and 2, and the bundle of hot water and HVAC projects identified in the GSE Solutions report. After committing to Carbon Neutrality, the City should include the cost to neutralize emissions from electricity (approximately 0.3 cents additional per kWh) when evaluating whether to pursue electricity efficiency and retrofit projects.
To take a highly-visible climate action step, Hermosa Beach should take steps to install solar photovoltaic systems on municipal property. The City should continue to explore the options of a Power Purchase Agreement and Solar Lease. The City should also request the retirement of greenhouse gas emissions allowances through the state’s Voluntary Renewable Electricity Program in order to claim unambiguous emissions reductions.
RECs are a commonly-accepted element of a green or carbon neutral portfolio, and should be an element of Hermosa Beach’s municipal Carbon Neutrality efforts. Some entities employ RECs as a short term strategy while they wait for new generating projects to be built. Hermosa Beach can retire Green-e RECs to make greenhouse gas reduction claims under The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol.
Over the long term, Hermosa Beach should establish a CCA program and become one of program’s first customers. This would allow for a unified approach to community and municipal greenhouse gas emissions reductions, with community members participating in the same program as the municipality. A CCA program can offer a 100% renewable, emissions-free energy option for the municipality, households, and firms. According to Southern California Edison rate schedule OBF-2, on-bill financing programs for energy efficiency retrofits will continue to be available under a CCA program.
Even with on-site solar generation and a CCA program, Hermosa Beach will likely continue to purchase streetlight services from Southern California Edison, particularly for streetlights on wood poles. The City can shift these accounts to Edison’s Green Rate option, or purchase Green-e RECs equal the amount of electricity used by SCE-owned streetlights. 261
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 45
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Municipal Fleet
Introduction
The Clean Fleet Policy and Action Plan, created in 2013, specifies a long-term goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions for the municipal fleet and alternative fuel used by 100% of contracted city service vehicles. The Plan also sets an interim goal to determine the feasibility of 50% emissions reduction for the City fleet and 20% emissions reduction for contractor service vehicles. These goals demonstrate the City’s strong commitment to reducing the carbon footprint of its municipal operations.
The City’s policies to “maximize the use of alternative fuel and low emission vehicles used to supply city services,” “reduce vehicle emissions through efficient fleet management and operations,” and “facilitate infrastructure to support alternative fuel vehicles” are in line with current best practices for California Local Governments, as identified by the Institute for Local Government and the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI).
Currently, the municipal fleet is comprised of CNG, diesel, gasoline, and propane fueled vehicles. According to Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan checklist, the City utilizes vehicles with fuel ranges from 11-44 mpg gasoline, 9-12 mpg diesel, 13-30 mpg CNG, and 30 mpg propane, all of which have varying emissions intensities. Though over 20% of the vehicle fleet is comprised of alternative fuel vehicles, making Hermosa Beach ahead of, or in line with many neighboring cities (Manhattan Beach has 13%, for instance), it is behind some area cities. For example, Santa Monica’s non-emergency fleet is comprised of 81% alternative fuel vehicles.
Some national cities also have more aggressive goals. Indianapolis, for instance, is the first city in the U.S. to pledge to convert its entire municipal non-police fleet to electric or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles by 2025.
262
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 46
Hermosa Beach’s City Fleet by Fuel Type
Fuel Type Number of
Vehicles (In Use)
Models
CNG 6 Camry, Interceptor, F-150, F-250
Diesel 8 Leader, Spartan, Fire Truck, Equipment
Gasoline 57 Tahoe, Escape hybrid, Crown Victoria, Durango, F150, F-250, F-350, F-450, Interceptor, Wrangler, Explorer, Utility truck, Impala, Taurus,
Propane 1 Interceptor
Source: Hermosa Beach Energy Efficiency and Climate Action Plan Checklist Related Sustainability Plan Goals
The City’s Sustainability Plan details three goals for the City’s fleet:
● T10: Adopt a clean fuel/ultra low emission vehicle buying policy for all City vehicles and devise a long-term plan for replacement, identifying several options for low emissions vehicles that includes a cost-benefit analysis for all fleet vehicle types. ● T11: Evaluate CNG filling station for municipal vehicles. ● T12: Provide EV charging stations for City vehicles.
Recommendations for Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet
Hermosa Beach’s 2013 City Fleet Policy and Master Plan is aligned with current regional best practices and policies. The City can continue to pursue their goal of Carbon Neutral municipal operations by continuing to adopt the most current trends in green fleet procurement and management. As the technology, performance, cost, financing options, and availability of alternative fuel vehicles are quickly evolving, the fleet policy should be responsive to these trends. The City of Hermosa Beach should review and revise the policy on a regular basis to ensure the City is acquiring the lowest emission vehicles that meet its needs. These recommendations are meant to provide guidance for future fleet procurement and management decisions. The recommendations are based upon the successful practices of other government agencies and best practices identified by respected resources.
To remain consistent with the City Fleet Policy’s guideline, which states, “Review available green vehicle options including: electric vehicles, hybrids, CNGs, hydrogen, biodiesels, and any other emission reducing vehicles,” the City of Hermosa Beach should continue to consider the latest and lowest-emissions alternative fuel technology when replacing fleet vehicles. Zeroemissions vehicles are now becoming staples of alternative fueled vehicle fleets, in addition to 263
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 47
conventional hybrid and natural gas vehicles. These zero-emissions vehicles have environmental and operating advantages over other alternative fuel vehicles. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, fuel-cell electric vehicles, and battery-electric vehicles are now available in most vehicle classes. To keep up with the fast-changing California market for alternative fuel vehicles through comparison of price, performance, and environmental qualities of specific vehicles, Hermosa Beach should consult the California Air Resource Board’s Drive Clean Buying Guide and the guidance provided in Zero-Emission Vehicles in California: Community Readiness Guidebook created by the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research.
California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard
The Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) is a California regulation adopted by the Air Resources Board (ARB) that requires petroleum suppliers to reduce the life-cycle carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the state. The regulation provides additional opportunities for Hermosa Beach to reduce gross greenhouse gas emissions and additionally neutralize net emissions from the transportation sector.
The regulation establishes a declining schedule for the average adjusted carbon intensity, in grams of CO2/MegaJoule (g/MJ), of fuel sold in the state. In 2014, the required adjusted carbon intensity is 94.41 g/MJ. To reduce the greenhouse gas intensity of gasoline sold in California 10% by 2020, the average adjusted carbon intensity of fuels sold must decrease to 86.27 g/MJ.
Producers, refiners, blenders, and distributors of transportation fuels must acquire and surrender LCFS credits, denominated in metric tonnes of CO2-equivalent, to demonstrate compliance with the regulation.
Hermosa Beach does not generate LCFS credits when using electricity or natural gas as vehicle fuels, as these credits are retained by the respective utilities. However, Hermosa Beach’s use of low-carbon fuels reduces the City’s gross greenhouse gas emissions.
Adjusted carbon intensity values compensate for differences in the energy economy of a vehicle. According to the ARB, an electric-powered vehicle travels 3.0 times further on a unit of energy than a gasoline-powered vehicle.
264
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 48
Adjusted Carbon Intensity of California Vehicle Fuels
Fuel Type Adjusted Carbon Intensity
(grams CO2e/MJ
California Gasoline (CARBOB) 95.86
California Reformulated Gasoline (CaRFG) 95.85
Midwestern Corn Ethanol 99.40
California Low-CI Ethanol 80.70
California-Sourced Compressed Natural Gas 75.22
California-Sourced Landfill Gas 12.51
Cellulosic Ethanol 20.40
Electricity (California average electricity mix) 41.37
Electricity (California marginal electricity mix) 34.90 Electricity (Zero Emissions Generating) 0.00
Hydrogen 33.09
Source: ARB Low Carbon Fuel Standard Staff Report Volume 1 Table IV-1 Electricity, landfill gas, and hydrogen are attractive options for reducing life-cycle emissions from transportation. Electricity is an especially attractive option, as the carbon intensity is a function of the mix of sources used to produce the electricity. For zero-emissions renewable energy, the carbon intensity value is zero.
According to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Alternative Fuels Data Center, electric vehicle infrastructure is most prevalent near Hermosa Beach, with 3 stations and 7 chargers, including 2 DC fast chargers, listed within the city. Three compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling stations are available in Torrance and near the Los Angeles Airport. Two of Southern California’s 9 hydrogen stations are located in the South Bay. Three biodiesel (B20+) and ethanol (E85) facilities are located in the Harbor Gateway corridor.
265
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 49
Alternative Fueling Stations near Hermosa Beach
Source: U.S. Department of Energy
Hermosa Beach should continue to prioritize plug-in electric vehicle purchases where they are practical. The convenience and future expansion potential of electric vehicle supply infrastructure and the low carbon intensity of electricity for vehicles makes plug-in electric vehicles an ideal choice for reducing gross emissions. Hermosa Beach should invest $50,000 in electric vehicle service equipment (chargers) and an additional $250,000 to accelerate its Clean Fleet Policy and Master Plan.
Public Safety Vehicles
As identified in the City’s Clean Fleet Policy, some fleets, particularly public safety, have limited or no alternative fuel options that meet their requirements. Where electric, natural gas, or hydrogen-fueled vehicles are not practical, Hermosa Beach could look to acquire Flex-Fuel vehicles, which can run on fuel blends of up to 85% ethanol (“E85”). 266
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 50
Ethanol has been criticized due to its high energy requirement to refine blends from certain feedstocks, and the indirect greenhouse gas emissions that result from additional land required to farm fuel crops. The California Low Carbon Fuel Standard takes a life-cycle perspective on environmental impacts in order to mitigate potential upstream environmental degradation due to use of ethanols and other fuels.
American automobile manufacturers offer a number of E85-capable Police Pursuit Vehicles, including the Chevrolet Impala, Dodge Charger, and Ford Police Interceptor Utility. The Hermosa Beach City Council recently authorized the purchase of four police vehicles. The 2014 Ford Police Interceptor Utility vehicle offers both a standard E85-capable 3.7-L V6 model and an upgraded 3.5-L V6 EcoBoost model that Hermosa Beach selected. The EcoBoost model offers higher performance, but is not E85-capable. The three 2015 Ford Fusion Hybrid vehicles the City authorized offer improved fuel economy but are not E85 capable.
Cellulosic Ethanol has a carbon intensity of 20.40, but is not widely available for use in California. The more commonly available California Low-CI Ethanol has a carbon intensity of
80.70. As of September 2014, 220 flex-fuel capable models are available in the U.S. for general use.
Alternatively, the City could look to purchase and retire greenhouse gas emissions credits produced under the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Transportation-specific offset options and procedures are discussed later in this section.
Financing Options and Considerations
As consistent with the City Fleet Policy guideline stating “Research available grants, dealer incentives, and organization incentives” within the City’s purchasing, maintenance and environmental considerations, the City of Hermosa Beach should continue to consider all available financing options when purchasing or leasing (or considering the purchase or lease of) an alternative fuel vehicle. A review of best practices identified the following financing options for consideration:
● Municipal Lease Financing: Although local governments do not benefit from tax credits offered for the purchase of zero emission vehicles, many lenders offer municipal lease financing options. Municipal lease financing programs allow municipalities to capture a portion of the $7,500 tax credit that they would not capture in a direct purchase. The Nissan Municipal Lease Financing program and the Ford Municipal Financing program are two examples in which auto dealers provide financing options to local government agencies. Riverside County; the City of Loveland, Colorado; the City of Houston, Texas; and the City of Olympia, Washington have all utilized municipal lease financing programs to acquire electric vehicles for their municipal fleet. 267
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 51
● State Procurement Contracts: Local governments are eligible to purchase vehicles using the California Department of General Services’ (DGS) state procurement contracts. Although many local government agencies prefer procuring fleet vehicles from local dealers, using the negotiated prices for alternative fuel vehicles listed with the state procurement contracts can serve as a baseline price for comparison purposes. ● Consider Total Cost of Ownership: The City should consider how capital and operating expenditures are allocated when making fleet procurement decisions. Since fuel costs will be lower in alternative fuel vehicles, the City may find that future operating savings justify higher initial procurement costs for alternative fuel vehicles. ● Include Co-Benefits in Cost Analysis: Hermosa Beach should explicitly assess other co-benefits and values that arise from the use of alternative vehicles, such as environmental health and the marketing of low emission vehicles to the community when comparing costs of alternative fuel vehicles to those of conventional vehicles.
Potential Partnerships and Resources
Instead of managing its municipal fleet internally, the City of Hermosa Beach could utilize local fleet management service companies to determine the best way to green their municipal fleet while maintaining fleet quality and cost-effectiveness. ● Vision Fleet Capital: Vision Fleet Capital strives to implement clean vehicles within fleets, cutting total cost of ownership, reliance on foreign oil, and enhancing service levels. Vision Fleet Capital also helps finance and manage fleets by offering low-cost financing, strategic operational advice, telematics tools, and asset management. Based locally in Venice Beach, California, Vision Fleet Capital could be a potential partner for Hermosa Beach to help the City electrify their vehicle fleet in the most cost-effective manner.
Fleet Management Regulations
The City Fleet Policy states that the City aims to “Reduce vehicle emissions through efficient fleet management and operations.” Best practices for efficient fleet management from the Institute for Local Government can assist Hermosa Beach in implementing this policy:
● Use Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and integrated software to control fleet vehicles, reduce misuse and increase efficiency through trip planning and location information. ● Provide fuel saving tips to drivers of fleet vehicles. These can include prohibiting idling, rapid acceleration, etc.
● Install battery systems for vehicles with onboard equipment to reduce truck idling when equipment is in use.
● Use technology options, such as requests via mobile device, for field personnel to prevent unnecessary trips back to the office.
268
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 52
Carsharing
Instead of replacing old or under-utilized vehicles, the City of Hermosa Beach can also consider using carsharing to meet its fleet needs. Carsharing is a model of car rental where people rent cars by the hour or fraction of an hour. Local governments throughout the U.S. have used carsharing to lower fleet costs, reduce carbon emissions, and support sustainable transportation in their communities. Municipalities that have utilized car sharing to supplement their fleet include Berkeley, San Francisco, Austin, New York City, Seattle, and Washington DC. Local governmental support for carsharing services usually involves either the direct contracting of service and/or provision of parking spaces. These municipalities experienced many benefits using carsharing within their operations, including lower fleet replacement, maintenance, fuel, insurance and staffing costs; newer, cleaner, and lower emission vehicles; more efficient vehicle allocation; increased vehicle access for employees; more available parking; and better data on vehicle use and mileage. As each municipality’s program varied in scope, the following provides more detail on the experiences of a few municipalities who have utilized carsharing. ● The City of Berkeley: The first city to replace municipal fleet vehicles with carsharing, Berkeley has had considerable success reducing vehicle emissions, costs, and inefficient fleet use through an innovative partnership with City Carshare, the San Francisco Bay Area’s carsharing service. Berkeley’s partnership with City Carshare not only uses carsharing to replace municipal fleet vehicles, but also includes carsharing in the planning and development process and supports carsharing for citizens and businesses. Berkeley also contracted City Carshare to develop specialized vehicle reservation software that dedicates vehicles for City employee use during normal work hours, and allows any member of City Carshare to use the vehicles on evenings or weekends. In the first year of the program, 4-5 carshare vehicles replaced 10-15 fleet vehicles. The use of carsharing has resulted in an annual financial savings of about $8,000 per year, most of which results from not having to use the City’s vehicle replacement funds to replace fleet vehicles. These savings do not include air quality, parking, or public health benefits.
● The City and County of San Francisco: As the City and County of San Francisco retires its older vehicles, City Carshare’s fleet provides vehicles for City employee use so the City does not have to purchase new fleet vehicles. This partnership reduces San Francisco’s vehicle fleet size, lowers purchase and maintenance costs, and reduces carbon emissions.
● Washington DC: In 2008, Washington DC replaced 360 vehicles with a shared fleet of 71 passenger vehicles operated by Zipcar technology through the “FastFleet” program.
FastFleet is Zipcar’s fleet management model that helps fleet managers right-size current fleets, enables self-service reservations and keyless access, develops analytics on driver and vehicle history, leverages software and support services, and transitions fleets to energy-efficient hybrid and electric vehicles where sensible. In Washington DC, employees use an intuitive web-based reservation system, phone, or mobile device to select and reserve vehicles and a wallet size access card to unlock the reserved car. 269
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 53
FastFleet varies from Zipcar’s conventional carsharing model in that it does not supply the vehicles. Instead, the City’s existing vehicles are equipped with FastFleet’s invehicle technology. After the first year of the pilot program, Washington DC projected a savings of greater than $6 million over five years.
● The City of Portland: Flexcar (now Zipcar) partnered with the City of Portland to provide fleet management services. In the pilot, Flexcar managed 12 out of 25 motor pool vehicles. Employees signed up for Flexar individually, and then each department was charged for vehicle use. This partnership saved Portland approximately 25% in the motor pool’s annual operating, maintenance, and fuel costs. After the pilot, Portland contracted all 25 motor pool vehicles to Flexcar, and Flexcar’s tracking technology helped Portland identify underutilized cars.
● The City of Austin: The City of Austin, Texas entered a revenue-neutral barter agreement with the carsharing organization Car2Go. Municipal employees could use vehicles for free during a six-month pilot phase, allowing Car2Go to gather consumer testing data and receive dedicated parking spaces avoiding parking fees. This partnership was innovative in that the City did not directly subsidize Car2Go, but the parking benefits were valued at about $85,000. After the successful pilot, Austin extended the partnership and numerous Texas state agencies have signed up for the Car2Go program.
Potential Carsharing Partnerships for Hermosa Beach
A few different organizations that offer carsharing services in L.A. County may serve as potential partners for Hermosa Beach. Each carsharing service listed below has experience working with a municipality and varies in its fleet composition, services offered, and other program components.
● Car2Go: In June 2014, Car2Go launched its pay-by-the-minute carsharing service in several South Bay Cities of LA County, including Hermosa Beach. Car2Go members use a smartphone application to find a vehicle, drive it, and then are able to park it in any public parking space identified as 2-hour parking or longer. This model differs from conventional round-trip services such as those provided by Zipcar. Hermosa Beach could contact Car2Go about the possibility of extending carsharing services for municipal fleet use, similar to Car2Go’s arrangement with the City of Austin, Texas. ● Zipcar: Now owned by Avis and operating in over 20 cities across North America, Zipcar is the world’s largest carsharing service and is an alternative to traditional car rental and ownership. Members use a Zipcard to unlock their car, pay a $6 per month membership fee and a driving rate of $8-10 per hour. Zipcar is a round-trip service, meaning members must return vehicles to the same parking space from which they obtained it.
Beginning in 2009, the City of Los Angeles partnered with Zipcar to dedicate 40 onstreet parking spots near USC and UCLA campuses to Zipcar. Washington DC partnered with Zipcar to utilize Zipcar’s FastFleet program to help them more efficiently 270
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 54
manage their municipal fleet. Hermosa Beach could partner with Zipcar either through the provision of parking spaces or by using Zipcar’s FastFleet as a tool to manage Hermosa Beach’s municipal fleet.
Recommendations for Other Vehicles
To achieve Carbon Neutrality for municipal operations, the City of Hermosa Beach must consider ambitious and innovative strategies. A review of the programs implemented by other municipalities identified the following strategies for consideration for Hermosa Beach:
Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs)
Hermosa Beach should also consider utilizing Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) within its vehicle fleet. Falling under the U.S. classification for low-speed vehicles, NEVs are battery electric vehicles have a maximum speed of 25 mph and are legally limited to roads with speed limits of 45 mph or less. Although NEVs are not included in vehicle sales forecasts and passenger fleet projects, these short-range, low-speed vehicles designed for local use could become a key component of the electric vehicle mix, especially in mature suburban areas like the South Bay that will likely not attract transit investments in the near future.
Beginning in 2004, the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) began to research a land use and transportation strategy that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, pollution, and gasoline use without focusing on transit investments or increased residential density. This led to the adoption of the Sustainable South Bay Strategy (SSBS) in 2010, which proposes that cities create compact destinations in neighborhood centers to encourage walking, cycling, and the use of NEVs for travel between these centers. As part of this strategy, the SBCCOG launched a NEV Demonstration Project which loaned a fleet of NEVs to South Bay households for an 18-month period.
This project was highly successful, finding that of those who participated, NEV mode share averaged 46% of the roundtrips. The average round-trip travel distance ranged from 2-5 miles.
Due to Hermosa Beach’s compact size, NEVs could also be an effective component of travel for municipal employees, whose average work trip or personal errand is likely only a few miles.
Global Electric Motorcars (GEMs), a type of Neighborhood Electric Vehicle by Polaris, are small vehicles which serve as an alternative to golf carts. GEMs have served municipal fleets as utility, parking and security, and even landscaping and construction vehicles. Municipalities who have employed NEVs within their fleet include the City of Palm Springs, the City of Cypress, and the City of Santa Monica.
Hermosa Beach should purchase two neighborhood electric vehicles for municipal fleet use and later determine whether these vehicles are a suitable replacement for other fleet needs. 271
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 55
Bicycle Fleet
The Institute for Local Government’s Sustainability Best Practices Framework recommends establishing a pool of shared bicycles to allow employees to borrow a bicycle for use during the workday. Providing bikes to employees reduces vehicle trips made during the day for business and personal errands, therefore reducing emissions. Municipalities all over California have adopted employee bike share programs, including Long Beach, Santa Monica, Cupertino, San Jose, and San Francisco. Municipal bike fleet programs typically provide bicycles, secure bicycle storage, and showers and lockers. They usually require employees to complete a bicycle safety training program to participate. Traveling by bike especially makes sense in the City of Hermosa Beach due to its compact size.
Although most cities provide regular bicycles, Hermosa Beach can also consider adding electric bicycles to its fleet program. Electric bicycles make it easier to travel on hilly terrain but still emit zero tailpipe emissions. An electric bike can achieve over 2,000 mpg-equivalent, making them a highly energy and cost-efficient option for Hermosa Beach. Hermosa Beach could be one of the very first cities to utilize electric bikes within their bike fleet. Purchasing regular or electricassist bicycles also provides Hermosa Beach with an opportunity to support local businesses.
See the following for a list of several local bike shops:
● Hermosa Cyclery, Inc: Located on the Strand at 20 13th Street in Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Cyclery specializes in strand cruisers that are easy to ride around the city and is regarded as a trusted bicycle service center.
● The Old Bike Shop: Located at 430 Pier Ave. in Hermosa Beach, the Old Bike Shop is an owner-operated bike shop that specializes in custom-built high end bikes. ● Beach Cities Cycle: This bike shop is located at 219 Pacific Coast Hwy in Hermosa Beach.
● Motion Bicycle Establishment: Motion Bicycle Establishment sells, rents, services, and repairs all types of bikes and is located at 914 Aviation Blvd in Hermosa Beach. ● Electric Bikes LA: Located at 433 Main Street in El Segundo, Electric Bikes LA is the first bicycle store in the region dedicated to the sale and repair of electric and folding bikes.
Offsetting Emissions from Vehicles
Implementation of California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) is leading to the availability of low greenhouse gas transportation fuels in California. However, costs to transport these fuels from their production location to Hermosa Beach can be high. Additionally, many vehicles are not designed to use low-carbon fuels.
The LCFS credits generated under the program are tradable. LCFS credits trade for $24 to $85 per credit, which, like allowances and offsets, are denominated in units of metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e). Compared with the $11.50 cost of California allowances, 272
Municipal Fleet Recommendations - Page 56
LCFS credits are an expensive means of offsetting emissions. However, in the future their use could allow for sector-specific neutrality claims. Instead of offsetting transportation emissions with forest or livestock projects, retiring LCFS credits will allow Hermosa Beach to claim that it is subsidizing low carbon fuels consumed by others on Hermosa Beach’s behalf.
Whether entities without compliance obligations like Hermosa Beach can acquire and voluntary retire LCFS credits for climate action goals has not been tested as of this writing. Additionally, no greenhouse gas accounting method currently exists to adjust fuel purchases for LCFS credits.
If a commonly accepted method to account for LCFS credit emerges, one specific LCFS credit opportunity may aid the City’s climate action outreach and education campaign. Digester gas is not currently a common transportation fuel, but the Climate Trust believes LCFS could change that. Many livestock farms in California are looking to capture methane in order to generate ARB offset credits. If the biogas is then consumed as transportation fuel in California, LCFS credits can be generated above and beyond these offsets, which are for avoided methane emissions. If Hermosa Beach decides to establish a direct relationship with a livestock project for purposes of acquiring greenhouse gas offsets, the City may be able to negotiate receiving any LCFS credits produced by the project.
The Low Carbon Fuel Standard is not to be confused with Federal renewable fuel regulations, which are based on the quantity of renewable stocks blended into transportation fuel, not the resulting change in greenhouse gas emissions. Federal regulations require fuel suppliers to blend renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel. In a manner similar to the Renewable Portfolio Standard, each refiner or importer of fuel must meet a Renewable Volume Obligation by surrendering a series of Renewable Identification Numbers to the U.S. EPA. The Renewable Identification Numbers can be separated and traded. When renewable fuel with a Renewable Identification Number is produced in or imported to California, that fuel may also generate LCFS credits for California’s program, which is a separate regulation. 273
Employee Commutes - Page 57
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Employee Commutes
Introduction
The City’s Sustainability Plan calls for a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from employee commutes relative to 2005 levels by 2020, which were 348 metric tonnes of CO2- equivalent2. The 2012 draft inventory shows 218 metric tonnes, a 37.4% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions versus 2005. However, it is important to note that the number of fulltime equivalent City employees decreased 33.8% during this period.
In pursuit of attaining the greenhouse gas reduction goal for employee commutes, the City’s Sustainability Plan recommends revising Hermosa Beach’s existing rideshare program to better incentivize employees to substitute more environmentally conscious alternatives to single occupant vehicle (SOV) trips for commuting. Launched in 1990 to comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Regulation XV, the City’s existing rideshare program provides employees who use alternative transportation modes 3 out of 4 days per week with $30 per month. Despite the incentive in place, the program had no participants as of July 2013. Just 11% of employees biked, walked, used transit, or a combination of these modes at least once a week. An employee commute survey conducted in 2013 on 108 out of 142 employees found that about 31% of employees were interested in participating in a rideshare program, and 50% of employees would be influenced by tax savings or other monetary incentives.
Using data gathered from the 2013 City of Hermosa Beach Employee Commute Survey, information regarding other cities’ employee commute reduction programs, and best practices in transportation demand management, Kaizenergy has outlined a strategy and plan the City of Hermosa Beach could use to overhaul its employee commute reduction program thus increasing participation and reducing resultant municipal carbon emissions.
Hermosa’s Employee Commute Reduction Challenge
Traditional commuter rideshare programs rely on matching employees with similar schedules, origins, and destinations. Creating successful carpool or vanpool matches is mostly a numbers game. Successful traditional rideshare matches rely on a large pool of people who are eligible
2 The Energy Efficiency & Climate Action Plan Draft Inventory, Forecasting and Target-Setting Report shows employee commutes at 348 metric tonnes in 2005. However, the City’s previous inventory reports employee commutes at 399 metric tonnes for 2005. The more recent document is presented to show change over time.
274
Employee Commutes - Page 58
to match, a subset of whom are interested in ridesharing. Strategies to match more carpools or vanpools include increasing the size of the pool of potential ride-sharers and/or improving and increasing incentives to motivate more people to share rides.
The City of Hermosa Beach’s current employee commute reduction challenges are twofold.
First, Hermosa Beach is a relatively small employer, with only 142 employees across multiple sites. This limits the potential for rideshare matching. Second, the City’s 2013 Employee Commute Survey indicated that, due to the structure of existing incentives, their effectiveness is limited.
As seen below, many potential carpool matches live in or near the City. While matching employees who live nearby into carpools will reduce vehicle trips and the need for on-site car parking, these consolidated short-distance trips will not cause substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from employee commutes. However, successful matches could provide an example of the program’s benefits for other employees who live farther away.
Hermosa Beach could also incentivize employees who live nearby to commute using neighborhood electric vehicles or electric-assist bicycles if these vehicles are added to the City’s fleet.
275
Employee Commutes - Page 59
Map of Zip Codes with 2 or more employees
Legend: Number of employees per zip code:
1 to 3 4 to 5 6 to 9 10 to 20
Top Zip Codes
Zip Code Place Number of
Employees
Distance from
Hermosa Beach
(miles)
90278 North Redondo Beach 20 2.0
90277 South Redondo Beach 14 2.3
90254 Hermosa Beach 9 0
90260 Lawndale 6 4.7
90275 Rancho Palos Verdes 6 13.3
276
Employee Commutes - Page 60
Heatmap of All Employees Responding to 2013 Commute Survey Best Practices in Local Government Commute Trip Reduction Programs
To reduce their municipal carbon footprint and to comply with regional regulatory agency trip reduction requirements, many municipalities have begun implementing employee commute reduction programs. Reviewing best practices in local government transportation demand management programs as well as the practices of neighboring cities and other successful local programs can help Hermosa Beach identify most effective methods to decarbonize its employee commutes.
Statewide Best Practices
The Institute for Local Government identifies several best practices for municipalities developing programs to reduce employee commutes via SOV. These best practices focus on using effective incentives and acquiring the necessary infrastructure to encourage employees to bike, walk, take public transit, or carpool to work. Hermosa Beach’s existing program is in line with the incentive best practices identified by Institute for Local Governments, but the City could enhance the attractiveness of these incentives and ensure the City provides the necessary 277
Employee Commutes - Page 61
infrastructure for employees to feel comfortable walking or biking to work. The best practices described by the Institute for Local Government are summarized below3:
Create an Incentive Program
The Institute for Local Government states that a municipality should “offer agency employees incentives to use alternatives to single-occupant commuting.” Incentives could include parking cash-out, flexible schedules, public transit incentives, bike share and rideshare services and subsidies, transit subsidies, and telecommuting. Rideshare programs should incorporate a “Guaranteed Ride Home” program and utilize smartphone technology.
Provide Infrastructure
As mentioned in the employee fleet recommendations, the Institute for Local Government suggests municipalities “establish a ‘bike barn’ to enable agency employees to borrow a bicycle to use for local meetings.” The bikes purchased for the bike barn could also be rented to employees for commute purposes. The Institute for Local Government also suggests municipalities “construct bicycle stations for employees that include bicycle storage, showers, and bicycle repair space” and provide locker and shower facilities for employees who bike or walk to work.
Review of Other Programs in Nearby Cities
The City of Hermosa Beach and neighboring South Bay cities face a unique set of challenges in motivating employees to cut SOV commutes: they are already mature, built-out suburbs without the robust public transit service found elsewhere in L.A. County. Nonetheless, we found that adjacent cities have ascertained more effective commuter incentive programs. The following discussion describes employee commute reduction strategies employed in the South Bay cities that neighbor Hermosa Beach as well as the successful approach taken by the City of Santa Monica, a municipality recognized statewide for its environmental leadership.
Manhattan Beach
The City of Manhattan Beach offers an incentive of $60 per month to employees who carpool, bike, walk, take public transit, or use a combination of these modes to get to work. The City currently has about 12 employees who participate (6 carpool, 2 bike, 2 walk, 1 public transit, and 1 combination of modes). The program costs the City about $8,500 per year. Information about the program is posted on the City’s employee “intranet” with all necessary instructions and forms. The City does not currently have a bike fleet or share program. In Manhattan Beach, only one staff member administers the program.
3 http://www.ca-ilg.org/sustainability-best-practice-area/efficient-transportation#agency-employeeprograms 278
Employee Commutes - Page 62
Redondo Beach
The City of Redondo Beach launched its “Employee Rideshare Program” in 2008. Employees who carpool, walk, bike, use public transit, vanpool, or drive alternative fuel vehicles earn incentive points on a daily basis that can be traded in for Sears gift certificates. Redondo Beach offers guaranteed return trip services, ride matching services, free CNG fueling, and an annual prize drawing for all employees who participate.
Torrance
The City of Torrance launched its “Catch a Ride” program to comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) rule 2202. Rule 2202 requires employers with 250 or more employees to reduce mobile source emissions generated from employee commutes. In the Catch a Ride program, employees who carpool, walk, bike, use public transit, or vanpool earn points on a daily basis that can be traded in for time off, gas vouchers, gift cards, and discounts on public transit. Program participants are eligible for emergency rides home, preferential parking, free car washes, and ride matching services.
Santa Monica
The City of Santa Monica reduced emissions from employee commutes through its Rideshare Club. The Rideshare Club consists of three sub-categories, the Commute Club, the Transit Club, and the Vanpool Subsidy Club. The Commute Club provides incentive points to employees who bike, carpool, drive an electric scooter, walk, ride the bus, and more.
Participants can drive as part of their commute or mix these options. A carpool consists of two or more people (they do not need to be coworkers at the City, but children without driver’s licenses do not count) who ride together at least 51% of round trip travel. Employees earn incentive points for each day they rideshare, and they exchange these points quarterly for a bonus on their paychecks. Commute Club participants must earn a minimum of 4 incentive points per month and a maximum of 40 points per month. Transit Club provides riders of mass transit fare reimbursement for travel costs to and from work. Mass transit includes bus, light rail, and train. To qualify, employees must use transit for at least 15 roundtrips per month. They are provided up to $84 for bus and $100 for rail. The Vanpool Subsidy Club provides employees who participate in a vanpool with up to $100 per month. To provide alternative mode commuters with mobility options at work, the City allows staff to borrow a bike from its “Bikes At Work” fleet to run errands, exercise, or attend meetings.
Recommendations
To reduce gross greenhouse gas emissions attributed to employee commutes, the City of Hermosa Beach should revise its Employee Commute Reduction Program (ECRP) to better incentivize employees to adopt alternative modes of commute and to generate lasting program participation. This section provides a brief description of the strategies the City could employ. 279
Employee Commutes - Page 63
1. Appoint an Employee Transportation Coordinator
The City should institutionalize its commuter program by designating a staff member to serve as the citywide Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC). This staff person’s work plan would include launching a revamped program and tracking the success of the program through annual surveys. Typically, ETCs are staff members in human resources, but Hermosa Beach might find it is more successful in recruiting staff who are already involved in promoting other sustainability-related initiatives. At an employer of Hermosa Beach’s size, the ETC role would not be a full-time position. This person would also serve as the go-to peer to answer questions, administer incentives, and disseminate informational materials to educate and inform fellow staff members about their options. Finally, this role would include investigating resources the City could access from Metro’s Commute Services, in order to further strengthen the program.
2. Form Partnerships
In concert with the newly-appointed ETC, Hermosa Beach should form partnerships with nearby employers to increase the likelihood of a carpool or vanpool match. The options are limited, but they include:
● The Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce’s 300 members, who represent firms that employ many private sector workers in Hermosa Beach. ● The Hermosa Beach City School District. School District offices are a short walk from Hermosa Beach City Hall, on the campus of Hermosa Valley School.
However, as 55% of commute survey respondents work a 4/10 schedule, from 7AM to 6PM Monday through Thursday, and school district employees may have different work schedules than City employees.
Hermosa Beach could also promote online ride matching through services already provided by Metro (www.ridematch.info). Unfortunately, no existing vanpool routes terminate in Hermosa Beach; many terminate in El Segundo.
3. Restructure Incentives
A common theme among successful local employee commute reduction programs is the provision of incentives to participants. These programs typically provide a monetary incentive to employees who participate a certain number of times per month, or employees earn incentive points on a daily basis that can be traded in for monetary incentives or other prizes. Of the 64 employees who answered the question, “What is the minimum monthly cash reward that would entice you to carpool, bike, walk, or take public transit to and from work at least 50% of the time?” in the 2013 Employee Commute Survey, 42% answered $30-50, and 37.5% answered greater than $50. Based on these results and the programs of neighboring cities, here are some future considerations:
280
Employee Commutes - Page 64
● Create a tiered incentive system: Although as of July 2013 no employees were participating in the City’s rideshare program, about 11% were biking, carpooling, walking or taking transit to work at least one day a week. This gap in participation could reflect the program’s stringent requirement, enforcing 3 days participation each week to qualify for incentives. To encourage more employee participation, the City could create a tiered incentive system in which participants utilizing the program more receive a larger incentive. For instance, employees who participate 5 days per month receive $20, and those who participate 10 days per month receive $50.
● Create a “points based” incentive system: Like the Cities of Redondo Beach, Torrance, and Santa Monica, Hermosa Beach could create a system based upon incentive points that are earned on a daily basis. This system also encourages employees to participate who are not ready for the existing program’s stringent requirement of 3 days per week. At the end of the month or the quarter, employees can trade in their incentive points for cash or prizes. ● Incorporate alternative fuel vehicle commuters: Some municipalities, like Manhattan Beach, offer incentives to employees who commute in 100% alternative fuel vehicles (100% electric, CNG, LNG, hydrogen fuel cell).
Hermosa Beach could even look to subsidize alternative fuel vehicle purchases and leases as a component of planned compensation increases. If the employee saves money on vehicle operation costs, the alternative fuel vehicle incentive could put additional money in the employee’s pocket above and beyond the City’s contribution.
The City of Hermosa Beach may also consider providing direct subsidies or a pre-tax set-aside for workers who use transit and vanpool.
● Direct subsidies: Employers can provide up to $230 per month tax-free to employees who use transit or vanpools. The employer therefore pays the benefit and receives equivalent deduction from business income taxes. The employer pays directly for vanpool expenses or purchases transit passes for employees. ● Set aside pre-tax dollars: Employees are allowed to set aside up to $230 per month of their pretax income to pay for transit or vanpools. Employees save on payroll and income taxes since it is not reported as a taxable salary. The amount set aside is a benefit and therefore reduces employer payroll costs. ● Partially subsidize costs: The employer subsidizes a portion of vanpool or transit costs in addition to salary, and allows employees to pay the rest.
Finally, if it is eligible to do so, Hermosa Beach should submit a Rideshare Service Agreement with Metro’s Commute Services division in order to make its employees eligible for Metro Rewards. Metro Rewards is an incentive program available at no cost 281
Employee Commutes - Page 65
to participating employers. In 2014, the Metro Rewards program provided workers who commuted using an environmentally-friendly mode with a coupon discount book to purveyors of goods and services throughout Los Angeles County worth $1,000 in immediate savings. The eligibility threshold is much lower: Employees must rideshare at least 8 work days a month during three consecutive months.
4. Add Bike Accommodations
To support bicycle commuting and the use of bicycles for mid-day trips, the City of Hermosa Beach should investigate:
● Ensuring there is adequate and safe bicycle parking at all work sites. ● Including building showers and lockers with bicycle commuters in facility renovation plans.
● Launching a bike barn at City Hall and the City Yard to allow for use of shared bicycles, including electric-assist bicycles.
● Initiating a Take Home Bike Program, which allows nearby employees to take home bicycles or neighborhood electric vehicles for use in commutes.
5. Determine a Telecommuting Policy
Instituting a telecommuting policy could help the City significantly lower vehicle emissions attributed to employee commuting, especially if initiated as an option for longdistance commuters. This would be both effective in reducing emissions and attractive to employees with significant commutes. Thirty-four percent of employees surveyed expressed interest in this option in the 2013 Employee Commute Survey. These employees indicated their ability to use such a policy 3 to 4 times a month; however 46% stated their work would not be compatible with telecommuting, and 17% were not interested. Several cities had success. A few strategies the City of Hermosa Beach should include when determining a telecommuting policy are listed below:
● Establish an eligibility list of suitable job categories, employment status, and prior performance ratings for telecommuting.
● Create a performance agreement for those employees eligible to telecommute, specifying a minimum for office-based hours, accessibility during regular work hours, methods of communication with supervisor, and necessary requirements for alternative worksites including computer specification and special equipment, desk size and configuration.
282
Other Emissions: Page 66
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Other Emissions
Natural Gas
Hermosa Beach uses natural gas for both building energy and some vehicles in the City’s fleet.
Increasing the energy efficiency of the City’s natural gas vehicles and equipment is key to gross emissions reductions. However, even with efficiency improvements, the 2013 Hermosa Beach Carbon Neutral Scoping Plan found that gross reductions in natural gas emissions are limited by the fuel’s inherent greenhouse gas intensity. This is in contrast to gross greenhouse gas emissions from electricity, which can be eliminated through use of renewable generation.
Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions have generated interest in low-carbon sources of natural gas. The section on the City’s vehicle fleet details an option for transferable credits when renewable natural gas is used as a transportation fuel. Biogas Transfer Credits may be a future option for other uses of natural gas.
Biogas Transfer Credits
Biogas Transfer Credits are a concept to separate the renewable qualities and emissions benefits from physical biogas, in a manner similar to RECs and LCFS credits. Biogas (or biomethane) is natural gas that is produced from the breakdown of organic material in the absence of oxygen. Biogas can be produced through anaerobic digestion at facilities that handle green waste, manure, municipal solid waste, and sewage. Biogas must typically be cleaned in order to improved quality, but can then be compressed into Biogas CNG or liquefied into Biogas LNG. Biogas combustion is considered a biogenic source of greenhouse gas emissions, and is not included in gross emissions totals in greenhouse gas inventories.
Historically, most biogas used for energy in California has been combusted on-site or nearby a landfill, dairy, or sewage treatment plant. A new law may bring new opportunities for pipeline biogas use in California. In 2014, the California Public Utilities Commission adopted regulations to implement AB 1900 (2012) enabling biogas injections into natural gas pipelines. The implementing regulations pertain to safety requirements and recordkeeping for biogas injections, including a facility’s annual biomethane production rate. The law does not establish Biogas Transfer Credits in California, but future laws or regulations could do so.
If Biogas Transfer Credits (or conceptually similar units with a different name) become available in the U.S. or California, Hermosa Beach could look to acquire credits to offset its natural gas consumption. For Hermosa Beach to take credit in its inventory, greenhouse gas accounting guidance would need to incorporate a method to adjust for the credits. 283
Other Emissions: Page 67
Contract Vehicles
Hermosa Beach contracts its street cleaning, landscaping, and refuse & recycling services. The City has already included stipulations that some of these contractors use cleaner, natural gas vehicles. The City’s street cleaning provider and refuse/recycling service use natural gas vehicles.
The City’s Clean Fleet Policy and Action Plan establishes several goals for contracted vehicles:
● Interim:
○ Determine feasibility of 50% emissions reduction for City fleet and 20% emissions reduction for contractor service vehicles (implemented with new contracts, or with amendments when feasible).
● Long-term:
○ Net zero greenhouse gas emissions for City fleet.
○ Alternative fuel used for 100% of contracted City service vehicles. This is a lesser goal in that it is not a net carbon neutral goal.
In the future, Hermosa Beach can specify contract terms that require the service provider to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions from the services they perform on behalf of Hermosa Beach. Alternatively Hermosa Beach could require that the contracted service provider disclose the volume and carbon intensity of fuels and amount of electricity used to service the contract, and Hermosa Beach can then take additional steps to offset those emissions.
Solid Waste
The City’s 2007 inventory reported 167 metric tonnes from waste in landfills. Hermosa Beach does not have operational or financial control over a landfill. However, emissions from waste sent to landfills are considered to be Scope 3 emissions under the Air Resources Board’s Local Government Operations Protocol. The City should include these emissions within its offset program.
The City’s 2007 inventory reported 85 metric tonnes from all contract service vehicles. Because Hermosa Beach can exercise operational control over its waste service provider, compressed natural gas combustion emissions from Athens Services’ collection of waste and transfer to landfills would be considered Scope 3 transportation emissions from contracted services.
Hermosa Beach’s current contract with Athens Services ends in 2021. Before Hermosa Beach considers a new waste hauling contract, it can include Athens Services’ GHG emissions in the city’s annual purchases of GHG emissions offsets. Hermosa Beach can also seek to include contract terms that Athens offset their emissions, if the City amends the contract before 2021. 284
Other Emissions: Page 68
Water
According to the 2007 Municipal Inventory, Hermosa Beach has operational control over limited sprinkler and irrigation systems and lift stations. These emissions, derived from electricity, may be addressed through electricity procurement strategies. Hermosa Beach may wish to consider upstream emissions related to water treatment and distribution. In the 2013 Hermosa Beach Carbon Neutral Scoping Plan, West Basin Water District’s emissions factors for imported and recycled water were found to be 0.00414 and 0.00388 kgCO2e/gallon, respectively. Hermosa Beach could elect to track and offset upstream emissions from water use, but it is not necessary for the City to claim carbon neutral status under the Local Government Operations Protocol. 285
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 69
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets
The Role of Offsets in Climate Commitments
Greenhouse gas offsets, typically denominated in metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e), represent avoided greenhouse gas emissions produced from a monetary investment in a specific project. Offset projects range from those that capture and destroy methane and other potent greenhouse gases to those that sequester emissions in soil, plants, and trees.
All aggressive (80% reduction or more) entity and community climate commitments referenced in this document either explicitly permit offsets or are silent on their use in achieving their goal.
Some commitments include separate goals for gross reductions - those achieved without the use of offsets - in addition to a goal for net emissions.
Commitments from organizations that plan to use offsets differ in the types of offsets that they will use. Some local governments and entities prefer to use offsets that are in some way connected to the city or entity. For instance, Austin Texas has its own boutique offset program, and the University of California plans to develop its own as well. Others have prescribed standards for the types of offsets they will pursue. Offsets range in quality: the ability to demonstrate that the offset is real, measurable, verifiable, additional, and permanent. Offsets of lower quality and those that are not connected to a particular sector or geography are typically cheaper. Various registries and protocols have been established to guarantee offset quality.
Defining Offsets
Real The offset has produced an actual reduction in GHG emissions, rather than shifting emissions to some other source.
Measurable The offset can be quantified, typically in metric tonnes of CO2-equivalent.
Verifiable An outside auditor can determine the existence of a single offset unit, which is then tracked using an offset registry.
Additional The offset was produced as a result of its value. The offset would not have occurred in the absence of an offset payment.
Permanent The offset cannot be reversed. If there is risk of reversal (e.g. the risk that forestry carbon stocks will be destroyed by wildfire), the offset protocol typically requires some portion of offsets be set aside. 286
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 70
Cities and Offsets
Guidance on the Use of Offsets
Accounting guidance for local governments doesn’t allow cities to replace gross emissions with offsets. Instead, local governments report their use of offsets – and resulting net emissions – as an informational item.
Local Government Operations Protocol (section 13.1.2.5) “Carbon offsets retired/generated and sold.
Local governments should account for and report all carbon offsets which they purchase and retire. These offsets may not be deducted from Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions due to the fact that a complete accounting framework which accurately and credibly tracks the ownership and retirement of these credits has not yet been established.
Local governments should also report any offsets that they both generate and sell as part of a climate mitigation project.”
U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions “The ICLEI community protocol requires the community to report gross GHG emissions without the impact of carbon offset projects, stocks, sinks, sequestration projects, purchases of carbon credits, or renewable energy certificates. The community may optionally, and separately, report the emissions reductions associated with any of the above activities.”
City Standards for Offset Quality
Few cities have specified the level of quality, types of projects, and project locations that they expect from offsets used to meet climate commitments.
British Columbia does have requirements for offsets used to meet that province’s goal for carbon neutral municipalities for 2012 and beyond. Offsets must be generated in British Columbia and meet the requirements set by the Pacific Carbon Trust, a boutique offset program established as a joint venture of the provincial government and a League of Cities equivalent.
Many local governments achieved carbon neutral municipal operations in 2012 or earlier, but the entire province is now readjusting its Carbon Neutral pursuits as a result of an offset scandal. The local offset registry, the Pacific Carbon Trust, has been absorbed by the provincial government after a scandal caused attempts to repeal the requirement that local governments neutralize their emissions. Local government were purchasing offsets at a cost of more than double the amount of their wholesale cost, and some of the offsets the Trust purchased and sold to local governments were ineligible under the provincial rules. 287
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 71
British Columbia’s experience highlights the potential trade-off of establishing a new, boutique offset program. Establishing the Trust allowed British Columbia greater control over the locations and types of offset projects that would be funded. However, costs of the boutique offset program may be higher than under an established, multisectoral offset program, and as with any new entity, oversight is important to ensure that actions are within the public interest.
One alternative to establishing a boutique offset program is to invest in a narrow range of projects offered by an existing offset registry. Hermosa Beach could, for example, seek out forestry projects in the Western United States.
Municipal Utilities
Several municipal utilities make use of both offsets and renewable energy certificates (RECs) in order to make climate-related claims. Palo Alto Utilities uses RECs that are eligible under California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard. The Sacramento Municipal Utilities District invests in its own projects as well as RECs eligible in California. Outside of California, Austin Energy makes direct contracts with wind generators. Seattle Power & Light uses offsets from the Climate Action Reserve and other third-party organizations.
Universities and Colleges
The few colleges that have already achieved carbon neutral status have chosen to be transparent about their use of offsets and the projects in which they invest. As educational institutions, these entities can incorporate a discussion of climate commitments and the use of offsets within their curriculum. That offsets are required to meet Carbon Neutrality commitments can highlight the vast challenge in decarbonizing organizations and places.
The College of the Atlantic in Maine claims to be the first Carbon Neutral educational institution.
It chose to use offsets from specific projects from two carbon project developers: the Carbon Fund and the Climate Trust. These developers invested in a traffic signal optimization project in Portland, OR and a truck stop electrification project in Oregon and Washington. These two projects are verified to the Oregon Standard, an offset standard created by the state legislature.
Colby College, also in Maine, first invested on-campus: in a biomass project and energy retrofits. For the remaining emissions, Colby purchased and retired carbon offsets from three projects: two landfills in Maine and Connecticut and one farm in Michigan. The offsets are registered with the Climate Action Reserve and meet the Reserve’s verification requirements.
However, the offsets are not eligible for conversion to California Compliance Offsets because they were not verified to the more stringent California standard.
Green Mountain College, another Carbon Neutral educational institution, invested in a farm methane project in Vermont.
288
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 72
Corporations
Microsoft is one of the few companies which details its use of offsets. Microsoft looks to use offsets that are credible, verifiable, and additional. Through the Gold Standard and Verified Carbon Standard offset registries, Microsoft has invested in reforestation in Kenya, home fuel switching in Mongolia, wind farms in China, and alternatives to deforestation in Brazil.
Consumers
TerraPass is a consumer service that retires offsets from the Verified Carbon Standard and Climate Action Reserve on behalf of consumers. One project registered on the Climate Action Reserve, the Arcata Community Forest, expanded an existing forest to protect adjacent land from logging.
Offset Programs Available to Hermosa Beach
Both California Compliance Offsets and voluntary offsets are available to Hermosa Beach.
California Compliance Offsets
California Compliance Offsets are admissible to the state’s Cap-and-Trade program. They are issued by the Air Resources Board. In certain cases, California Compliance Offsets can be converted from offsets generated by the Climate Action Reserve, Verified Carbon Standard, and American Carbon Registry.
California Cap-and-Trade
California’s Climate Change Scoping Plan outlines the state’s strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, as required by AB 32 (2006). The Scoping Plan relies heavily on a cap on greenhouse gas emissions that come from electricity, natural gas, transportation fuels, and certain other industries like cement production. Entities in these sectors must acquire and surrender an amount of emissions allowances equivalent to their greenhouse gas emissions. Greenhouse gas emissions from other sectors, like agriculture and landfills, are uncapped and will likely remain uncapped due to monitoring and verification challenges in enforcing compliance. Emissions reductions projects from uncapped sectors can produce compliance offsets.
California Greenhouse Gas Allowances
The California Air Resources Board issues both California Greenhouse Gas Allowances and ARB Offset Credits, which together serve as compliance instruments for sources subject to state’s Cap-and-Trade program. Up to 8% of the total compliance obligations for a year can be met using ARB Offset Credits. The Air Resources Board issues ARB Offset Credits for projects that meet certain criteria contained in an approved offset protocol. Registry Offsets from projects meeting the same criteria but registered with the American Carbon Registry, Climate Action Reserve, or Verified Carbon Standard can be converted to ARB Offset Credits. 289
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 73
California Greenhouse Gas Allowances and ARB Offset Credits are both denominated in metric tonnes of CO2-equivalent, and are identical aside from the ARB Offset Credits being limited to 8% of the overall compliance obligation. Hermosa Beach can acquire and retire either California Greenhouse Gas Allowances or ARB Offset Credits to offset its greenhouse gas emissions within California’s Cap-and-Trade program.
Allowances are available in vintages corresponding to the three established compliance periods, 2013-14, 2015-17, and 2018-20. When retiring allowances to offset the City’s emissions from municipal operations, the City should retire offsets of the same vintage as the year to be offset.
For example, if the City wishes to offset its 2015 emissions, it should retire 2017 vintage offsets.
Acquiring California Allowances to Offset Hermosa Beach’s Emissions Hermosa Beach is not a covered entity and does not have a compliance obligation under California’s Cap-and-Trade Program. Hermosa Beach does indirectly participate in California’s Cap-and-Trade system. Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas, and transportation fuels distributors who sell products and services to Hermosa Beach and their contractors do have a compliance obligation, and these entities must surrender allowances to the Air Resources Board for each compliance period.
Hermosa Beach has several options to retire California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances.
The City can register on the California Air Resources Board’s Compliance Instrument Tracking System Service (CITSS) to purchase allowances at auction and transfer compliance instruments to the Retirement Account. The City can register as a Voluntary Associated Entity pursuant to California Code of Regulations Section 95814. Under this scenario, the City could acquire allowances:
● Directly from the Air Resources Board at quarterly auctions. The City must register as an auction participant after establishing a CITSS Account and submitting a bid guarantee prior to each auction.
● From a third party via an exchange. The Intercontinental Exchange and CME Group offer futures contracts for California Carbon Allowances (CCA). Futures contracts provide for delivery of a tangible or intangible asset at a future date. For instance, between now and December 24, 2015, Hermosa Beach could purchase and retire 2017 Vintage California Carbon Allowances to be delivered to Hermosa Beach’s CITSS account at the end of December 2015.
● From a third party via an over-the-counter transaction. The third party must maintain a CITSS Account and the transaction must be registered on CITSS to guarantee legitimacy.
290
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 74
Hermosa Beach can also work with a registered Voluntarily Associated Entity to purchase and retire offsets on behalf of the City. A Voluntarily Associated Entity would conduct transactions on Hermosa Beach’s behalf. Several brokers hold CITSS accounts and provide carbon offsetting (or “balancing”) services on behalf of third parties, like Hermosa Beach. These include:
● 3Degrees - offers Carbon Balancing Services
● Element Markets - developer and supplier of GHG credits, including California ● Evolution Markets - Kyoto, EU-ETS, RGGI, & California Hermosa Beach should expect to pay a slight price premium or service fee when working with an exchange or Voluntary Associated Entity to purchase and retire allowances. For instance, contracts for 2014 allowances delivered at the end of September 2014 traded for $12.00 on the Intercontinental Exchange, while allowances from the August 2014 Air Resources Board auction settled at $11.50.
Retiring California Allowances to Offset Hermosa Beach’s Emissions Retiring California Compliance Instruments is simple. Hermosa Beach, a broker, or a third party can access CITSS and process a transfer from the General Account to the Retirement Account.
Instruments transferred to a compliance account will result in real offsets to Hermosa Beach’s emissions.
Analysis of California Allowance Prices
California allowances are of the highest quality, as they are used for compliance in a legallybinding Cap-and-Trade program. As such, California allowances are more expensive than offsets for voluntary programs.
The California Air Resources Board has sold allowances at auction since the fall of 2012.
Allowance prices peaked at $14.00 in May of 2013. The settlement price at 2014 auctions (as of August) has concentrated between $11.48 and $11.50.
291
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 75
California Air Resources Board Allowance Auction Prices In the 2010 Economic Analysis, the Air Resources Board projected a 7% annual price increase from 2012 through 2020, which is roughly what a company could earn on invested capital. The reasoning behind that is because entities with a compliance obligation can hold onto allowances for a future compliance period, and allowances are subject to a rate of return similar to what allowance holders can achieve from asset classes of a similar risk. If allowance holders expected allowances to appreciate at a higher rate (say 10%), they would buy and bank allowances in pursuit of an extraordinary profit opportunity. This would bid up the price of allowances to a price level where the extraordinary profit opportunity vanishes (back to 7%).
The 2010 Economic Analysis projected an allowance price of $25 per metric tonne in 2020. At a 7% annual price increase, expected 2014 values would be $16.66 per tonne, $5.16 higher than the latest auction. Because of this price discrepancy, an updated analysis is needed to forecast allowance prices through 2020. The analysis below projects a 5.8% (low-case), 7% (mid-case), or 11% (high case) annual increase in allowance prices after 2014. 292
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 76
Projected California Air Resources Board Allowance Prices Cost
Projection
Annual %
Increase 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Low 5.8% $11.50 $12.17 $12.87 $13.62 $14.41 $15.24 $16.13 Middle 7.0% $11.50 $12.31 $13.17 $14.09 $15.07 $16.13 $17.26 High 11.0% $11.50 $12.77 $14.17 $15.73 $17.46 $19.38 $21.51 Analysis by Kaizenergy
The California State Legislature must amend state law for the state’s Cap-and-Trade program to continue beyond 2020. Two factors point towards continuation of the Cap-and-Trade program.
First, the legislature and public’s support for addressing climate change through carbon pricing remains strong. Second, allowing the program to end would mean a significant loss of revenue from allowance sales. With future Cap-and-Trade auction revenues already committed to the California High Speed Rail project, abandoning carbon pricing would leave the project partiallyfinished or in search of another multi-billion dollar source of funds.
Voluntary Offset Registries
Voluntary greenhouse gas emissions offsets have been available for two decades. Most climate commitments have used voluntary offsets to validate emissions reductions claims.
Outside of California, Quebec, and a handful of other places subject to Cap-and-Trade programs, voluntary offsets are the standard instruments of making carbon claims.
Voluntary offsets are available at a fraction of the price of compliance offsets. A 2013 study of voluntary offsets found an average price of $4.90 per metric tonne of CO2-equivalent, 42% of the California ARB allowance price.
A system of registries and independent verifiers are responsible for assuring the quality of voluntary offsets. Registries determine policy related to offset production through protocols, work with the offset project developer to verify the project, issue offset units based on the metric tonnes of reductions produced, and track the transfer offset units between parties. Some projects on these registries can also be certified to produce California Compliance Offsets, if the projects meet certain protocol and verification requirements 293
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 77
Voluntary Offset Registries
Offset Registry Share of
Global
Market
Convertible
to ARB
Offsets?
Notes
Verified Carbon Standard 47% Some
projects
70 U.S.-based projects (of 1,200+).
VCS has the most methodologies of
any offset registry.
The Gold Standard 15% No Focuses on offsets produced outside of the United States, primarily in
developing countries.
Climate Action Reserve 5% Some
projects
California-based organization (Los
Angeles) focused on offsets produced
in the U.S. (360 projects), Mexico (8
projects), and Canada. 51 projects are
in California.
American Carbon Registry 1% Some 95 U.S.-based projects (of 105). Staff trained on ARB protocols.
Market shares based on 2013 data in Forest Trends State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2014 Voluntary Offset Project Types
Offset projects must adhere to an approved protocol or methodology. While the California Air Resources Board has approved protocols for five project types, the various voluntary registries have approved dozens of protocols and methodologies.
The table below presents the range of offset projects, which are classified by their Kyoto Protocol greenhouse gas emissions sector.
294
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 78
Types of Offset Projects, by Emissions Sector
Sectoral Scope Registries with
approved
method/protocol
Types of projects
1 - Energy Generation ACR, VCS, TGS Cogeneration facilities, fuel use in cooking stoves
2 - Energy Distribution ACR Recycling of transformer oil 3 - Energy Demand ACR, VCS Building weatherization, campus energy efficiency
4 - Manufacturing
Industries
None None yet
5 - Chemical Industries VCS Chemical production processes 6 - Construction None yet
7 - Transport ACR, VCS Vehicle fuel switching, truck stop electrification
8 - Mining/Mineral
Production
ARB, CAR Coal mine methane
9 - Metal Production None None
10 - Fugitive Emissions
from Fuels
None None
11 - Fugitive Emissions
from Gases
CAR, VCS Destruction of ozone depleting
substances, leak detection
12 - Solvents Use None None
13 - Waste Handling and
Disposal
CAR, VCS Landfill methane capture, organic waste
composting
14 - Agriculture, Forestry,
Land Use
ACR, ARB, CAR,
VCS, TGS
Rice cultivation, forestry, urban forest,
prevention of deforestation, fertilizer
management, soil management,
15 - Livestock and
Manure Management
ARB, CAR Manure management, grazing
management
ACR = American Carbon Registry, ARB = California Air Resources Board, CAR = Climate Action Reserve, TGS = The Gold Standard, VCS = Verified Carbon Standard, 295
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 79
Recommendations on Use of Offsets
Offsets are an important part of an aggressive climate commitment, as demonstrated by other cities, corporations, and colleges that have claimed or plan to achieve Carbon Neutrality status.
Offsets put a price signal on carbon emissions. By purchasing offsets, Hermosa Beach acknowledges the real environmental cost of greenhouse gases emissions from municipal operations. Offsets also signal that the City is looking for other ways to reduce its emissions as any investments to reduce gross emissions will, in turn, reduce future offset expenditures. As such, the sustained use of offsets can be seen as a commitment device for achieving gross emissions reductions: the City cannot simply ignore the cost of its gross greenhouse gas emissions. As a climate commitment device, offset retirements are not limited to a certain percentage of a City’s emissions ㅡ the City pledges to neutralize gross emissions at any level.
However, offsets are not a free pass to emit; they are only effectively utilized as part of a larger climate action strategy. Hermosa Beach stakeholders may have a negative perception of the City’s use of offsets, especially if they feel the City’s efforts to reduce gross emissions are inadequate. Use of offsets alone will not accomplish the City’s other objectives or lead to the desired co-benefits from the City’s climate action efforts.
Transparency is exceedingly important in climate action, especially when offsets are used.
Hermosa Beach should establish a performance monitoring program that includes regular reporting of the City’s climate action efforts, along with publishing greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Offsets utilized within a public education and outreach campaign that focuses on the City’s efforts to reduce its gross greenhouse gas emissions from municipal operations.
The offsets should tell a story that people can connect to when understanding the City’s climate actions and considering their own.
The experience of existing cities and entities, particularly the three educational institutions, highlights the possibility to connect offsets with a community as part of a public education program about a city’s climate action efforts. By investing in certain projects – projects whose stories resonate with residents – Hermosa Beach can communicate the climate action challenges that it is seeking while connecting the community with specific projects they can also invest in to offset their own emissions.
While a wide range of offset project types exist, Hermosa Beach may find some more suitable than others if the City wishes to include its own offset retirements as part of a public education and outreach program. The public may feel more of a connection with offsets generated within the United States, especially those from projects in California. 296
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 80
Should Hermosa Beach Use Compliance or Voluntary Offsets? Hermosa Beach must decide whether to use the cheaper voluntary emissions offsets or the more expensive California Compliance Offsets. The annual price of offsets to cover the City’s 2007 municipal inventory in all cost projection scenarios is less than 0.1% of the City’s general fund budget.
Range of Annual Costs to Offset 1,552 Metric Tonnes of CO2-e Scenario Offset Price per Metric Tonne Annual Cost to
Offset 1,552 MT
ARB - Current $11.50 (August 2014 auction price) $17,848 ARB - Future High $21.51 (high-case projection for 2020) $33,383 Voluntary - Current $5.00 $7,760
Voluntary - Future High $7.50 $11,640
Under this range of prices, the City will find that many of its opportunities to reduce gross greenhouse gas emissions are not cost competitive with offsets or allowances. For example, for $99.84, the City could retire the more expensive ARB-eligible allowances (at $11.50/metric tonne) to offset the tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions of a 2002 Ford Expedition traveling 60 miles round trip, 4 days per week, 48 weeks per year. The annual cost of ARB-eligible offsets to neutralize for a Prius traveling 15 miles per day is approximately $7.74. Incidentally, the Expedition driver would save $2,051.30 per year in fuel costs (at $4.00/gallon) by switching to a Prius. This example illustrates both how inexpensive greenhouse gas emissions are, even within California’s Cap-and-Trade system, and also the need for strategic climate action policies that are well-integrated within the City’s existing municipal operations. It also illustrates that use of offsets can be the most cost-effective option to achieve a given level of reductions.
The price of allowances will increase in the future as California’s cap on emissions decreases and early actions are exhausted, but even a seven-fold increase in allowance price would only yield a $60 per-month incentive for the Ford Expedition driver to switch to a carpool. The City has found this level of incentive too low for many employees. 297
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 81
Advantages and Disadvantages of ARB and Voluntary Offsets Advantages Disadvantages
Voluntary ● Are 50% cheaper than California
Compliance Offsets.
● Offers a greater variety of projects.
● Most projects are located
outside of California.
● Voluntary offsets can be
perceived to be lower quality
than compliance offsets.
California
Compliance
● California offsets are perceived as
the highest quality offsets.
● There exists a strong connection
between Hermosa Beach and
statewide actions: these offsets can
help the City explain statewide
actions including cap and trade
program.
● Their use creates additional
emissions reductions within
California; effectively reducing the
cap.
● Their use shows Hermosa Beach is
willing to put a higher price on
greenhouse gas emissions.
● California offsets are more
expensive; and these
additional expenditures could
be used to reduce gross
emissions.
● It may be more difficult for
consumers to acquire and
retire offsets if households
and businesses within
Hermosa Beach want to
invest in the same offset
project as the City.
➤
➣
➢
Hermosa Beach should primarily rely on California Compliance Offsets to validate its emissions claims. Although California Offsets are slightly more expensive, their higher perceived quality and the connection they provide to statewide climate actions will make Hermosa Beach’s climate commitment more robust.
Selecting Among ARB-Approved California Compliance Offsets Up to 10% of allowances in California’s Cap-and-Trade system can come from offsets. While, purchasing and retiring California Emissions Allowances has the same effect on emissions as purchasing and retiring California Compliance Offsets, Emissions Allowances have a number of limitations that make them less ideal for Hermosa Beach. For instance, it is difficult to explain within a public education campaign, that, as a result of Hermosa Beach’s offset purchases, a petroleum refinery or a natural gas power plant had to pay a slightly higher price to comply with California’s greenhouse gas regulations. Emissions allowances are intangible, and the only distinguishing characteristic is their ARB-assigned serial number.
Offsets have a story: a project location, emissions removal process, and organization associated with their production. As of September 2014, Hermosa Beach can choose from 298
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 82
projects among the five ARB-approved offset protocols. Offsets from each type of project are functionally equivalent in mitigating climate change as they are denominated in metric tonnes of CO2-equivalent. However, each individual project can tell a different story. In choosing among project types, Hermosa Beach should consider how stakeholders can relate to the project’s location, the type of project, and the organization that produces the offset and receives payment. In addition, attractive photographs of the project itself would aid in any public education and outreach efforts the city conducts.
U.S. Forest Projects
The link between trees and carbon dioxide emissions is well-established in middle school biology classes. Trees are tangible, beautiful, and provide a range of ecosystem services besides converting carbon dioxide into oxygen. Projects certified under the U.S. Forest Protocol provide for the preservation of large, contiguous forest lands in the United States, including some locations in California. These forests will provide for attractive photographs, and the sites could even be visited by Hermosa Beach stakeholders. The offsets are produced by non-profit conservation organizations or private landowners.
299
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 83
U.S. Forest Project
Harvego Bear River Preserve Project / Photo by Placer Land Trust Urban Forest Offsets
Urban forests, including street trees, parks, and wildlands within city limits, are highly soughtafter amenities that provide shade, mitigate the urban heat island effect, and give character to streets and parks. Under current Air Resources Board guidance, planned tree planting and maintenance activities within the urban forest and qualify for offsets. Few projects have used this approach thus far, but a possible protocol update could expand the volume of offsets that come from urban forest projects.
The Climate Action Reserve approved two Urban Forest protocols in June 2014. The Urban Forest Management Protocol offers a programmatic approach to the updated Urban Tree Planting protocol. The California Air Resources Board previously adopted the Climate Action Reserve’s Urban Forest Protocol and will need to adopt the Urban Forest Management protocol for the programmatic approach to create California Compliance Offsets. The Reserve hopes that these new protocols facilitate implementation of more urban forest projects. 300
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 84
Municipalities and counties can aggregate projects within an urban area boundary, as established by the U.S. Census Bureau. Projects must be a minimum of 50 acres. Projects are issued credits that are for renewable 25-year periods. Projects are subject to monitoring, reporting, and verification for 100 years to ensure permanent removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Carbon offsets are generated annually based on the difference in standing live carbon stocks in trees that results from an urban forest management plan (versus the area’s baseline).
The City of Santa Monica’s Urban Forest Protocol Project was the first submitted to the Climate Action Reserve. The 1,000 new trees planted under the City’s Urban Forest Master Plan are estimated to produce 5,000 metric tonnes in CO2 reductions over 100 years, or an average of roughly 50 metric tons per year. The fact that this is roughly 4% of Hermosa Beach’s emissions from municipal operations illustrates the sheer number of trees needed to offset emissions. To date, the Santa Monica project hasn’t produced any offsets.
Boulder estimates that its urban forest of approximately 330,000 trees sequesters 2,000 tons of CO2 annually.
Because the annual amount of emissions sequestered from an urban forest in a 1.4 square mile city would be low relative to the municipality’s emissions from operations, Hermosa Beach may wish to express interest in participating in any potential future South Bay Cities Council of Governments-wide or county-wide urban forest management protocol effort. A larger effort could be more efficient for cities that wish to participate.
Livestock Projects
The ARB’s livestock projects involve biogas control systems to manage manure on cattle and pig farms. Manure is processed into biogas in a digester, then typically combusted to produce electricity and heat. Livestock projects provide a connection to the familiar topics of farms and food, though this could be perceived as negative as many of the livestock projects are sited at concentrated animal feeding operations. Offsets are typically produced by companies that specialize in biogas control systems and complying with the offset protocols. 301
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 85
Livestock Project
New Hope Dairy Livestock Biogas Digester Project in Galt, CA / Photo American Biogas Council Ozone Depleting Substances
Some substances which deplete the ozone layer also have a high global warming potential, as measured in carbon dioxide equivalent. Ozone depleting substances that also have a high global warming potential are used as refrigerants, solvents, and fire suppressants. Destroying these substances provides both ozone protection and greenhouse gas reduction.
Chemical companies typically produce greenhouse gas offsets from the destruction of ozone depleting substances, and photos of the project locations appear to be a chemical plant.
Mine Methane Capture
In a mine methane project, methane is combusted and used to make energy.
The ARB recently approved the Mine Methane Capture Protocol. The Climate Action Reserve has existing projects registered in Alabama, Colorado, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
Coal mine methane projects may be challenging to explain in a public education and outreach campaign that highlights Hermosa Beach’s actions and use of offsets. The projects may evoke a negative association with dirty coal mining and burning coal in power plants, both environmentally harmful activities. In addition, payments to the mining companies or energy/environmental service companies that produce the offsets are unlikely to be viewed as positively compared with payments to forest conservation non-profits. 302
Use of Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Page 86
Photos of projects depend on mine location; the project in Colorado is on a scenic mountainside.
Mine Methane Capture Project
Vessels Coal Gas project in Colorado / photo by Vessels Coal Gas ➤
➣
➢
Hermosa Beach should prioritize U.S. Forest and Urban Forest offset projects, but may consider other projects within an offset portfolio. Other important considerations are whether Hermosa Beach stakeholders can invest in the same project as the City and how the specific project would fit within the City’s outreach and education efforts. 303
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 87
Hermosa Beach Municipal Carbon Neutral Plan
Performance Monitoring, Costs, Transparency, and Outreach Performance Monitoring
In committing to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions from municipal operations, the City of Hermosa Beach is assuming responsibility for its own emissions. It will track and neutralize its contributions to global emissions. Thus, greenhouse gas emissions are now seen as a liability to the City, and the City should take steps to continuously account for emissions with processes similar to how the City accounts for cash, indebtedness, and other assets and liabilities. After the City sets a greenhouse gas reduction target for local government operations, Hermosa Beach should conduct an annual greenhouse gas emissions inventory within 9 months of the close of each calendar year. Meeting this timeline necessitates that the City implement systems to track the following at a minimum of a calendar-year resolution:
● Amount (kWh) of electricity used for each service account, by year. If electric vehicle chargers used exclusively for municipal operations are submetered, this electricity may be broken out into vehicle fleet.
● Volume of gasoline, diesel, natural gas, and other fuels loaded into City-owned vehicles and equipment.
● Volume of gasoline, diesel, natural gas, and other fuels attributable to Hermosa Beach from contracted waste, landscaping, and street sweeping services. ● Miles traveled by vehicle type for employee commutes and business travel. ● City pairs and number of City passengers for any business travel flights taken. ● Weight and composition of waste generated by the City’s municipal operations. ● Recharge volume of high-global warming potential gases into vehicle or facility air conditioning units, fire extinguishers, or other equipment.
Performance Monitoring Tools
Much of this data can be tracked in ICLEI’s Master Data Workbook4, an Excel spreadsheetbased tool that can be compiled by multiple individuals or shared on a networked hard drive.
Two web-based tools will assist Hermosa Beach in tracking activity data and conducting an annual emissions inventory. These are described below.
4 ICLEI’s Master Data Workbook is recommended for Hermosa Beach’s purposes over The Climate Registry’s Local Government Operations Protocol Activity Data Entry Workbook, developed by Juan Matute in 2009
304
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 88
ClearPath Tool for Online Greenhouse Gas Performance Monitoring ClearPath is a web-based tool that allows local governments to perform community-scale and government operations GHG inventories in the cloud. Multiple users can collaborate to enter data from different departments, and the data can be exported in the common .csv format for sharing outside of the web-based tool. ClearPath includes modules for forecasting business-asusual emissions changes (adjusting for state-level actions like renewable electricity and fuel economy standards) and forecasting the effectiveness of various emissions mitigation strategies.
ClearPath offers two tracks: a Government Track and a Community-Scale Track. Using the Government Track, a user can create an inventory following the guidelines of the Local Government Operations Protocol. Using ClearPath, a local government can translate its activity data, like fuel or electricity use, into greenhouse gas emissions by using emissions factors.
ClearPath contains default emission factors, including some that are California-specific. Users can also add their own emissions factors, for instance a utility-specific value for kg CO2e from electricity. ClearPath allows users to compare between inventory years, tracking progress over time. An inventory module user guide contains additional information about ClearPath’s features.
With data tracking, emissions calculation, and forecasting in the same web-based tool, Hermosa Beach can close the loop between climate target setting, performance monitoring, and iterative policymaking.
Hermosa Beach has access to ICLEI ClearPath as an ICLEI member and a California Local Government through the Statewide Energy Efficiency Collaborative California (SEEC). SEEC is a collaboration between investor-owned gas and electric utilities, ICLEI, the Institute for Local Government, and the Local Government Commission. The SEEC program website offers live and recorded training materials on ClearPath and other resources.
Enterprise Energy Management Information System
In the summer of 2014, an analyst at the South Bay Environmental Service Center began using McKinstry’s Enterprise Energy Management Information System (EEMIS), a web-based tool, to accesses and analyze the Hermosa Beach’s account data from Southern California Edison.
This tool will be used to track changes in energy use over time, particularly those that follow efficiency and retrofit projects. The EEMIS tool can report monthly, quarterly, and annual consumption data, streamlined for greenhouse gas reporting and other uses.
Hermosa Beach should budget to maintain an account on the McKinstry EEMIS, approximately $900 per year. Additionally, the City should train staff to access the data in order to monitor the progress of energy retrofit projects, assess the City’s opportunities for power purchase agreements, and produce annual reports for use in greenhouse gas emissions inventories. 305
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 89
Municipal Climate Action Indicators
Many intermediate indicators will help the City better understand its progress versus annual greenhouse gas emissions totals or subtotals. For instance, a draft 2012 inventory indicates that commute emissions fell by 37.4% between 2005 and 2012. At first, this may seem to indicate that the City achieved its goal of a 20% reduction in 2005 commute emissions by 2020.
However, the number of full-time equivalent employees (FTE) decreased 33.8% during the 2005 to 2012 period. Commute greenhouse gas emissions per FTE during that same period decreased by only 5.3%. Indicators like metric tonnes of CO2-e per FTE can give a clearer picture of the City’s climate action performance than can aggregate totals or subtotals. Activity data, such as miles traveled by employees or kWh of electricity used by facility, can also elucidate the City’s climate action position in greater detail.
The Local Government Operations Protocol and other guidance for municipal operations recommend several indicators for municipal operations. The following indicators and metrics are applicable to Hermosa Beach’s annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory:
306
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 90
Indicators and Metrics for Municipal Climate Action Performance Indicator Metrics What it Means
Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT)
Fleet GHG/VMT A measure of GHG intensity of each mile
traveled by the City’s vehicle fleet. As the
City’s fleet procurement policies take
effect, this metric will show progress.
Number of vehicles
(#Vehicles)
VMT/#Vehicles The utilization rate for vehicles as the City considers shared-use fleet
Equipment Operating
Hours (EOH)
Equipment
GHG/EOH
The GHG intensity of equipment
operations
Number of Pieces of
Equipment
(#Equipment)
EOH/#Equipment GHG intensity per unit of equipment
Solid Waste Tonnage
Disposed (Waste)
Waste GHG/Waste The GHG intensity of the waste the
municipal government sends to landfills;
varies based on a landfill’s methane control
practices
Refuse & Recycling
Vehicle Service Hours
(WasteVehHours)
Waste Vehicle
GHG/
WasteVehHours
Indicates the GHG intensity of the
contractor’s refuse and recycling
operations
Kilo-watt Hours (kWh) Electricity
GHG/kWh
The GHG intensity of electricity used by
Hermosa Beach. As Hermosa Beach
begins to blend its energy procurement,
the effects will show in this metric.
Number of FTE
Employees
(#Employees)
Commute
GHG/#Employees
The GHG intensity of employee commutes.
This metric allows the City to monitor the
effectiveness of its commute reduction
program
Volume of Water
Pumped (Water)
Water Pumped
GHG/Water
The GHG intensity of water pumping at the
City’s water pumping lift stations.
Transparency
Transparency is exceedingly important in climate action. Greenhouse gases are invisible, and the activity that leads to their emission is difficult to track. Thus, interested stakeholders must 307
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 91
rely on the City’s recordkeeping of activity data, indicators, and annual emissions in order to assess the City’s climate action progress.
Transparency is even more important when instruments such as RECs or offsets are used to neutralize all or a portion of emissions. Most stakeholders cannot verify the off-site RECs or offsets. When claiming offsets in its annual greenhouse gas inventory, Hermosa Beach should list the serial numbers (or ranges) of offsets retired for the year. When using unbundled RECs to claim renewable energy and reduce the scope 2 emissions, the City should follow guidelines in The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol and “disclose additional activity data such as MWh consumed, purchased, generated or sold as supplemental information.“ Hermosa Beach should also disclose the serial numbers of RECs credited to the City’s electricity consumption.
Carbonn Cities Climate Registry
An emerging global standard for reporting municipal and community climate action provides a venue for Hermosa Beach to register its targets, document its actions, and publish its annual greenhouse gas inventory.
The Carbonn Cities Climate Registry is a new partnership of C40, R20, and other global groups focused on sub-national climate action. The Carbonn registry will help local governments to achieve transparency and accountability for their local climate actions. In reporting its targets, inventories, and actions on Carbonn, Hermosa Beach will be on the same platform as other cities seen as national or global climate action leaders.
In September 2014, ICLEI USA’s Resilient Cities for America Initiative named Carbonn as their official reporting platform. As of October 2014, 465 cities are reporting to Carbonn, including Manhattan Beach and Hawthorne. The two South Bay cities have reported their greenhouse gas emissions targets, performance, and mitigation actions.
Verification & Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Some entities have a third-party verify their greenhouse gas inventory prior to reporting the results. The process for verifying greenhouse gas emissions inventories is similar to auditing corporate accounting records, and the intention is to enhance the credibility of the results.
Because the cost to verify emissions can be substantial, few local governments and other entities contract with a third-party verifier before reporting their emissions. Credible verification can be obtained through an ISO 14064 compliant procedure, such as through The Climate Registry.
Hermosa Beach can increase the credibility of its municipal GHG claims by obtaining third-party verification for a greenhouse gas inventory. However, because the cost of verification, Hermosa Beach should only audit certain inventories (for instance, the first year it sets a carbon neutrality 308
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 92
goal). As Hermosa Beach develops new systems to monitor emissions, its annual emissions inventories will become more accurate and precise, reducing the need for third-party verification.
Outreach and Education
Building external awareness of the city’s climate action programs necessitates an effective public outreach and education plan. Effective implementation can be challenging - especially because most greenhouse gas reduction efforts produce intangible results. Unlike some other air pollutants, greenhouse gases are undetectable by human senses at typical concentrations.
Furthermore, greenhouse gas reductions represent the absence of these undetectable gasses.
This creates an environmental communications challenge versus tangible efforts like cleaning water in a river or reducing urban smog.
The City should lead its climate action messaging with the city’s goal to be a climate action leader: that its municipal actions will show both the community and other cities what can be possible. The City should support this message by detailing specific actions that have been implemented, and those that are planned for the future. Visualizations of alternative fuel vehicles or solar photovoltaic panels on City facilities can be the most salient demonstrations of climate actions. When explaining less salient actions, the City should tie examples to actions that that community members can take. For example:
● When explaining specific energy retrofit actions, include information on the various options for residential and commercial energy retrofits, especially property-assessed financing
● Connect the City’s actions to procure zero-emissions electricity with options available to residents and business owners, especially the emerging option of Community Choice power
● make the City’s employee commute program an example of implementing GHG reductions in transportation sector called for in the City’s General Plan update Tying municipal efforts to community action will also strengthen the perception of the City as a climate action leader. As, greenhouse gas emissions from municipal operations make up only about 1% of community-wide emissions, connecting the City’s municipal actions with other emissions reductions will demonstrate the city’s ability to leverage its position as a climate action leader. Outside resources, such as ICLEI’s education and outreach guidance and reports from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communications, will help the City determine effective messaging for its outreach and education program.
Rather than relying on a limited number of City staff to communicate the City’s climate action program, Hermosa Beach should train municipal employees and community members to be climate action ambassadors. By holding regular information sessions that describe the City’s 309
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 93
climate action commitment, existing actions, and future plans, Hermosa Beach can empower City employees and community members to tell the City’s story – and connect it with community-wide actions. This training problem would follow the model popularized by An Inconvenient Truth, the film version of a presentation Al Gore had taught thousands of others to deliver. This model of empowering others to tell climate-related stories has showed great success in connecting individual action with an overwhelming problem.
Information sessions specific to municipal employees could first highlight all municipal actions and then highlight efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions reductions opportunities within an employee’s area of responsibility. The training sessions can also highlight how some highlyvisible municipal programs (such as the employee commute reduction program and bicycles at work) serve as examples for community-wide actions.
The City should publish regularly-updated presentations on the its website, so that ambassadors can obtain and deliver the most up-to-date information, which stakeholders can also access on the Carbonn Cities’ Climate Registry. A version of the climate ambassador information session could also be delivered within the Hermosa Beach Unified School District, combined with materials from California’s Education and the Environment Initiative.
Costs of Municipal Climate Action
After accounting for savings from projects which reduce energy cost or vehicle operating costs, the 30-year estimated cost of recommended municipal carbon neutral programs is $59,130, or $1,971 per year. This low cost is made possible because many of the municipal climate action opportunities available to the City have a payback period of less than 5 years. In addition to the projects listed above, the recommended municipal climate action programs will fund and Employee Commute Coordinator (20% FTE Assistant), a Climate Programs Analyst (25% FTE Analyst), and annual Greenhouse Gas Offsets required to make carbon neutral claims. The recommended plan is cash-flow positive by 2019.
The added cost of a “first-to” position, in which the city would achieve carbon neutrality in 2017 rather than 2020, would be approximately $52,475.
310
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 94
Municipal GHG Reduction Project Options - Cost Summary
Implementation Measure
Range in Cost per
MTCO2e Recommended
Electricity
Community Choice Aggregation $10 to $18 Yes
Solar Photovoltaic Projects (ASE Solar Solutions
Proposal) -$5 to $20 Yes
GSE Solutions "Project 1" -$125 to -$175 Yes
GSE Solutions "Project 2" -$225 to -$275 Yes
GSE Solutions - Hot Water, HVAC $20 to $35 Yes
Municipal Fleet
Bicycle Parking Yes
Employee Bicycles Yes
Mode Switching Yes
Bicycle Fleet Program (Summary) $0 to -$200 Yes (Bundle) EV Service Equipment Yes
Accelerate Clean Fleet Master Plan Yes
Fuel Switching Yes
EV Fleet Program (Summary) -$50 to -$150 Yes (Bundle)
Employee Commutes
Employee Commute - Carpool Incentive $100 to $200 Yes
Employee Commute - EV Incentive $500 to $1,000 No
311
Recommended Municipal Climate Actions: Cost Details and Timeline Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 95
Implementation Measure Cost Assigned 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 to
2044 Total
Electricity
Community Choice Aggregation Additional Costs of Procurement $0 $18,309 $14,119 $9,193 $4,501 $90,024 $136,147 Solar Photovoltaic Projects
Max upfront buydown of PPA
Rate to Cost-Neutral $30,000 0 0 0 0 0 $30,000
GSE Solutions "Project 1" Outlay and annual savings $89,262 $72,087 $54,912 -$51,524 -$51,524 -$51,524 -$51,524 -
$1,236,576
-
$1,315,673
GSE Solutions "Project 2" Outlay and annual savings $63,029 $126,059 -$23,792 -$23,792 -$23,792 -$23,792 -$571,008 -$477,088 GSE Solutions - Hot Water, HVAC Outlay and annual savings $53,785 $107,571 -$5,056 -$5,056 -121344 $29,900 Municipal Fleet
Bicycle Parking Infrastructure at City Facilities $7,500 $7,500 Employee Bicycles
5 regular bicycles; 5 electricassist bicycles $18,500 $46,250 $64,750 Mode Switching
Vehicle Operating Savings from
Car -> Bike -$2,750 -$2,750 -$2,750 -$2,750 -$2,750 -$66,000 -$79,750 Bicycle Fleet Program (Summary)
EV Service Equipment $50,000 $50,000
Accelerate Clean Fleet Master Plan
Additional Costs for
Procurement (versus BAU) -
$7,500 per vehicle $100,000 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $250,000 Fuel Switching
Operating Savings from $3 to $4
Gasoline -> Electricity mi/year -$3,817 -$9,860 -$18,568 -$23,124 -$21,733 -$521,593 -$598,695 EV Fleet Program (Summary)
Employee Commutes
Carpool Incentive Add’l Costs for $50 Incentive $1,200 $2,400 $3,600 $4,800 $6,000 $144,000 $162,000 EV Incentive Costs for $125 Incentive $7,500 $15,000 $22,500 $30,000 $37,500 $900,000 $1,012,500 Employee Commute Coordinator -
Staffing Additional Costs for Incentive $20,000 $21,000 $22,050 $23,153 $24,310 583443 $693,956 Climate Programs
Staffing - Analyst
Additional Cost of Managing All
Climate Programs $30,000 $31,500 $33,075 $34,729 $36,465 729303.75 $895,073 Total Costs
Total Cost of All Projects $89,262 $142,616 $424,104 $114,068 $158,781 -$34,371 -$33,579 -$923,500 -$151,880 Estimated Advance from Equipment Replacement Fund $142,026 $142,026 $142,026 $426,077 Outlay Before Offsets, Net of Advance -$52,764 $591 $282,079 $114,068 $158,781 -$34,371 -$33,579 -$923,500 -$577,957 CARB (High Quality) GHG Offsets
2021 - 2044 costs assume
further reductions in gross GHG
emissions $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,442 $490,609 $511,051
Total Cost After Offsets -$52,764 $591 $282,079 $114,068 $158,441 -$34,837 -$13,736 -$447,279 $59,130 312
Recommended Municipal Climate Actions: Cost Details and Timeline Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 96
Begins Duration 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Electricity
Community Choice Aggregation 1Q2015 8
Solar PV Procurement 3Q2015 6
GSE Solutions "Project 1" 1Q2014 12
GSE Solutions "Project 2" 3Q2015 8
GSE Solutions - Hot Water, HVAC 3Q2017 6
Municipal High Efficiency Procurement Policy 1Q2014 ongoing Municipal Fleet
Municipal Facility - Bicycle Parking 4Q2014 1
Bike Barn @ Work 1Q2016 1
Municipal Facility - EV Service Equip. 3Q2015 4
Electric Vehicle Procurement 1Q2016 10
NEV Procurement 2Q2016
Employee Commute
Carpool Incentive 1Q2016 ongoing
EV Incentive 1Q2016 ongoing
Municipal Service Contracts
Amendment with Athens Services
Other
Purchase Offsets 1Q2017 ongoing
Climate & Commute Programs Staffing 1Q2016 ongoing
2016 2019 2020
implementation period
Implementation Measures
Implementation Period 2015 2017 2018
active
313
Performance Monitoring, Costs, & Transparency: Page 97
Revenues for Climate Action
Climate Action leaders are often expected to “put their money where their goals are” in order to fund climate action measures and programs. For instance, Boulder’s Climate Action Plan tax generates about $1.8 million per year for the City. Voters renewed that measure in 2012.
One possible source of dedicated, local funds for climate action is Hermosa Beach’s Utility User Tax, which currently generates approximately $2.5 million per year. At current prices for California Emissions Allowances ($11.50), the community’s 134,000 metric tonnes of CO2-e would cost about $1.54 million to offset. This represents an approximately 61% increase above existing rates of 6% on electricity, gas, and water and 5.5% on communications services, bringing the total Utility User Tax would be 10%, comparable to Santa Monica’s. Utility User Tax rates in California range from 1% to 11%, except in Arcata, which levies a 45% tax on residential customers that use greater than 600% of the baseline electricity usage. Currently, it appears that Albany is the only California city looking to use the Utility User Tax to fund climate action.
Hermosa Beach could try an alternate approach to funding aggressive reductions in communitywide emissions. The City could declare its interest in implementing innovative demonstration projects and programs in order to achieve aggressive reductions in community-wide greenhouse gas emissions, provided they are available at no additional expense to the City.
The City’s national-leading commitment to neutralize emissions from government operations could attract attention from companies looking for such an opportunity. However, as more cities dedicate funding to climate action, Hermosa Beach may lose out on some promising demonstration projects to cities that can dedicate some local funding to assisting these companies.
Hermosa Beach will likely find itself in a more competitive position for state and federal grants as a result of its aggressive climate commitment. The state and federal government have a vested interest in the success of leaders, so that they may lead the path for others to follow. If Hermosa Beach maintains a climate leadership position into the future, it will likely find success in attracting government grants and government-sponsored pilot projects. 314
City of Hermosa Beach
GHG Inventory, Forecasting,
Target-Setting Report for an
Energy Efficiency Climate
Action Plan
January 2015
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
3570 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300
San Diego, California 92130
Funded by:
Local Government Strategic Plan Strategies Program
Under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission 315
316
Contents i
Contents
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ iii Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 GHG Emissions Inventories........................................................................................................................... 2 Emissions Reporting ............................................................................................................................... 2 Emissions Sectors...................................................................................................................... 2 Calculation Methodology .......................................................................................................... 4 Community Emissions ............................................................................................................................ 4 2005—2012 Emissions Summary .............................................................................................. 5 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Inventories................................................................................... 6 Energy........................................................................................................................................ 9 Municipal Emissions............................................................................................................................. 11 2005—2012 Emissions Summary ............................................................................................ 11 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Inventories................................................................................. 13 Energy...................................................................................................................................... 15 Inventory Forecasts..................................................................................................................................... 17 Business-as-Usual Forecasts................................................................................................................. 17 Community Business-as-Usual Forecast.................................................................................. 18 Municipal Business-as-Usual Forecast .................................................................................... 19 Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecasts ................................................................................................. 19 Community Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecast .................................................................. 20 Municipal Adjusted Business-as-Usual Forecast..................................................................... 21 Reduction Targets....................................................................................................................................... 22 Recommended Community Targets..................................................................................................... 22 Recommended Municipal Targets........................................................................................................ 23 Conclusions and Next Steps........................................................................................................................ 25 References .................................................................................................................................................. 26 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
Appendix B: Methodology
317
ii Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Tables
Table 1. Key Terms in the Report..................................................................................................................1 Table 2. GHGs Analyzed in the Inventories..................................................................................................2 Table 3. Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 ....................................................6 Table 4. Community GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 ........................................................7 Table 5. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Community Inventories...................................8 Table 6. Demographic Data for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 .......................................................................9 Table 7. Activity Data and GHG Emissions of Energy in 2005 and 2012.......................................................9 Table 8. Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 ..............................................................12 Table 9. Municipal GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 ..........................................................13 Table 10. Activity Data used in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 Municipal Inventories..................................14 Table 11. Activity Data and GHG Emissions of Energy in 2005 and 2012...................................................15 Table 12. Growth Factors for 2012, 2020, and 2035 ..................................................................................18 Table 13. Community BAU Forecast ...........................................................................................................18 Table 14. Municipal BAU Forecast..............................................................................................................19 Table 15. Community Adjusted BAU Emissions..........................................................................................21 Table 16. Municipal Adjusted BAU Emissions.............................................................................................21 Table 17. State-Aligned GHG Reduction Targets........................................................................................22 Table 18. State-Aligned Municipal GHG Reduction Targets.......................................................................23 Figures
Figure 1. Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012 ...................................................5 Figure 2. Community GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 ........................................................6 Figure 3. GHG Emissions for Community Electricity and Natural Gas, by Sector.......................................10 Figure 4. Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector for 2005 and 2012..............................................................12 Figure 5. Municipal GHG Emissions for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012.........................................................13 Figure 6. GHG Emissions for Municipal Electricity and Natural Gas, by Sector..........................................16 Figure 7. Community Emissions Inventories, Projections, and Targets......................................................23 Figure 8. Municipal Emissions Inventories, Projections, and Targets.........................................................24 318
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations iii
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
AB Assembly Bill
ADC Alternative Daily Cover
BAU Business-as-Usual
CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy
CH4 Methane
CARB California Air Resources Board
CIWMB California Integrated Waste Management Board
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalents
EECAP Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan
EO Executive Order
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GWP Global Warming Potential
IEAP International Local Government GHG Emissions Analysis Protocol IFT Inventories, Long-Term Forecasts, and Target-Setting IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
JWPCP Joint Water Pollution Control Plant
kWh Kilowatt-hour
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
LGOP Local Government Operations Protocol
MT Metric Tons
NDN Nitrification/denitrification
N2O Nitrous Oxide
RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SBCCOG South Bay Cities Council of Governments
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCE Southern California Edison
SCG Southern California Gas Company
SEEC Statewide Energy Efficiency Collaborative
319
iv Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach Key Findings
Community
The City of Hermosa Beach decreased emissions 7.7% from 2005 to 2012, from 137,160 MT CO2e to 126,611 MT CO2e.
On-Road Transportation, Commercial Energy, Solid Waste, Water, and Off-Road Sources sector emissions decreased while Residential Energy and Wastewater sectors increased emissions from 2005 to 2012.
Energy-related emissions account for about 40% of the total community emissions. Under the Adjusted Business-as-Usual (BAU) forecast, emissions will be 111,690 MT CO2e in 2020 and 94,162 MT CO2e in 2035. These emissions levels are 19% lower in 2020 than 2005 and 31% lower than 2005 by 2035.
The City should choose a reduction target that is feasible and ambitious. The State recommends a 15% reduction below 2005 levels by 2020, which would be achieved under the Adjusted BAU scenario.
To continue reductions consistent with the State’s long-term emissions reduction goal of lowering emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, the City would need to reduce emissions in 2035 by 24,210 MT CO2e from an Adjusted BAU forecast. This is a 24% reduction from the Adjusted BAU emissions level and would achieve a 49% reduction from 2005 levels.
Municipal
Municipal emissions have decreased 9% from 2005 to 2012, from 1,501MT CO2e to 1,372 MT CO2e.
Emissions in all sectors decreased between 2005 and 2012 except for the Vehicle Fleet & Equipment and SCE-Owned Outdoor Lights.
Municipal energy use accounts for approximately 1% of all emissions. Under the Adjusted BAU forecast, emissions will be 1,751 MT CO2e in 2020 and 1,872 MT CO2e in 2035. These emissions levels are 17% higher in 2020 than 2005 and 25% higher than 2005 by 2035.
The City would need to reduce emissions by 1,751 MT CO2e from the 2020 Adjusted BAU emissions level to meet its carbon neutrality goal by 2020. 320
Introduction 1
Introduction
The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventories, Long-Term Forecasts, and Target-Setting (IFT) Report contains the first steps toward the City of Hermosa Beach (City) identifying energy-efficiency measures in an Energy Efficiency Climate Action Plan (EECAP). The inventories describe historic energy use and GHG emissions and the forecasts describe projected future emissions in the City. The target-setting section describes GHG reduction recommendations that are consistent with State goals and may assist the City in establishing local GHG reduction targets. The inventories and recommended reduction targets will help the City in the next step of the EECAP, which is to identify energy efficiency and GHG reduction measures that are relevant, meaningful, and feasible.
Specifically, the IFT Report includes (words and phrases in bold are described in Table 1):
Historic GHG emissions in community inventories and municipal inventories for 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012;
Future GHG emissions for 2020 and 2035 under a business-as-usual forecast scenario and adjusted business-as-usual forecast scenario; and
Recommended GHG reduction targets for 2020 and 2035.
Table 1. Key Terms in the Report1
Term Definition
Adjusted business-as-usual
A GHG forecast scenario that accounts for known policies and regulations that will affect future emissions. Generally, these are state and federal initiatives that will reduce emissions from the business-as-usual scenario.
Baseline year The inventory year used for setting targets and comparing future inventories against.
Business-as-usual
A GHG forecast scenario that assumes no change in policy affecting emissions since the most recent inventory. Changes in emissions are driven primarily through changes in demographics.
Community Inventory GHG emissions that result from the activities by residents and businesses in the city.
An inventory reports emissions that occur over a single calendar year.
Emission factors The GHG-intensity of an activity.
Municipal Inventory
GHG emissions that result from the activities performed as part of the government operations in the city and are a subset of the community inventory. An inventory reports emissions that occur over a single calendar year.
Reduction targets
GHG emissions levels not to be exceeded by a specific date. Local reduction targets are often informed by state recommendations and different targets may be established for different years.
Sector A subset of the emissions inventory classified by a logical grouping such as economic or municipal-specific category.
1 A glossary of terms is also included as Appendix A.
321
2 Inventory, Forecasting, and Target-Setting Report – City of Hermosa Beach GHG Emissions Inventories
GHG emissions inventories are the foundation of planning for future reductions. Establishing an existing inventory of emissions helps to identify and categorize the major sources of emissions currently being produced. In this report, four years of historic inventories are presented to show not only the major sources of emissions in the City, but also how those sources vary over time. For both the community and municipal inventories, the years 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2012 are presented. The 2005 inventory (for both community and municipal operations) is considered the baseline year. A baseline year is established as a starting point against which other inventories may be compared and targets may be set, and is generally the earliest year with a full emissions inventory. The most recent inventory (2012) has the most relevant data for planning purposes, while the interim years (2007 and 2010) provide context and may help identify trends or anomalies.