Hermosa Beach City Council
August 9, 2022

form HUD-4010 (06/2009)
ref. Handbook 1344.1
of the wages of any laborer or mechanic the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing bona fide fringe benefits under a plan or program, Provided, That the
Secretary of Labor has found, upon the written request of the contractor, that the applicable standards of the DavisBacon Act have been met. The Secretary of Labor may require the contractor to set aside in a separate account assets for the meeting of obligations under the plan or program. (Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under OMB Control Number 1215-0140.)

2. Withholding. HUD or its designee shall upon its own
action or upon written request of an authorized
representative of the Department of Labor withhold or
cause to be withheld from the contractor under this
contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor, or any other Federally-assisted contract
subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements,
which is held by the same prime contractor so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered
necessary to pay laborers and mechanics, including
apprentices, trainees and helpers, employed by the
contractor or any subcontractor the full amount of wages required by the contract In the event of failure to pay any laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice, trainee or helper, employed or working on the site of the work, all or part of the wages required by the contract, HUD or its
designee may, after written notice to the contractor,
sponsor, applicant, or owner, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further
payment, advance, or guarantee of funds until such
violations have ceased. HUD or its designee may, after
written notice to the contractor, disburse such amounts withheld for and on account of the contractor or
subcontractor to the respective employees to whom they
are due. The Comptroller General shall make such
disbursements in the case of direct Davis-Bacon Act
contracts.

3. (i) Payrolls and basic records. Payrolls and basic
records relating thereto shall be maintained by the
contractor during the course of the work preserved for a period of three years thereafter for all laborers and
mechanics working at the site of the work. Such records shall contain the name, address, and social security
number of each such worker, his or her correct
classification, hourly rates of wages paid (including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in Section l(b)(2)(B) of the Davis-bacon Act), daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made and
actual wages paid. Whenever the Secretary of Labor has
found under 29 CFR 5.5 (a)(1)(iv) that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs
reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a plan or program described in Section l(b)(2)(B) of the DavisBacon Act, the contractor shall maintain records which show that the commitment to provide such benefits is
enforceable, that the plan or program is financially
responsible, and that the plan or program has been
communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics
affected, and records which show the costs anticipated or the actual cost incurred in providing such benefits.

Contractors employing apprentices or trainees under
approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the registration of apprenticeship programs and certification of trainee programs, the registration of the apprentices and trainees, and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the applicable programs. (Approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under OMB Control Numbers
1215-0140 and 1215-0017.)
(ii) (a) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all
payrolls to HUD or its designee if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant
sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to HUD or its designee. The payrolls submitted shall set out accurately and completely all of the information required to be maintained under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i) except that full social security numbers and home addresses shall not be included on weekly transmittals. Instead the payrolls shall only need to include an individually identifying number for each employee (e.g., the last four digits of the employee’s social security number). The required weekly payroll
information may be submitted in any form desired.

Optional Form WH-347 is available for this purpose from the Wage and Hour Division Web site at
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/forms/wh347instr.htm or its
successor site. The prime contractor is responsible for the submission of copies of payrolls by all subcontractors.

Contractors and subcontractors shall maintain the full
social security number and current address of each
covered worker, and shall provide them upon request to
HUD or its designee if the agency is a party to the
contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the
contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant
sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to HUD or its designee, the contractor, or the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor for purposes of an
investigation or audit of compliance with prevailing wage requirements. It is not a violation of this subparagraph for a prime contractor to require a subcontractor to provide addresses and social security numbers to the prime
contractor for its own records, without weekly submission to HUD or its designee. (Approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under OMB Control Number
1215-0149.)
(b) Each payroll submitted shall be accompanied by a
“Statement of Compliance,” signed by the contractor or
subcontractor or his or her agent who pays or supervises the payment of the persons employed under the contract
and shall certify the following:
(1) That the payroll for the payroll period contains the information required to be provided under 29 CFR 5.5
(a)(3)(ii), the appropriate information is being maintained under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i), and that such information is correct and complete;
231
Previous editions are obsolete

form HUD-4010 (06/2009)
ref. Handbook 1344.1
(2) That each laborer or mechanic (including each helper, apprentice, and trainee) employed on the contract during the payroll period has been paid the full weekly wages
earned, without rebate, either directly or indirectly, and that no deductions have been made either directly or
indirectly from the full wages earned, other than
permissible deductions as set forth in 29 CFR Part 3;
(3) That each laborer or mechanic has been paid not less than the applicable wage rates and fringe benefits or cash equivalents for the classification of work performed, as specified in the applicable wage determination
incorporated into the contract.
(c) The weekly submission of a properly executed
certification set forth on the reverse side of Optional Form WH-347 shall satisfy the requirement for submission of the “Statement of Compliance” required by subparagraph
A.3.(ii)(b).
(d) The falsification of any of the above certifications may subject the contractor or subcontractor to civil or criminal prosecution under Section 1001 of Title 18 and Section
231 of Title 31 of the United States Code.
(iii) The contractor or subcontractor shall make the
records required under subparagraph A.3.(i) available for inspection, copying, or transcription by authorized
representatives of HUD or its designee or the Department of Labor, and shall permit such representatives to
interview employees during working hours on the job. If the contractor or subcontractor fails to submit the required records or to make them available, HUD or its designee
may, after written notice to the contractor, sponsor,
applicant or owner, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds. Furthermore, failure to submit the required records upon request or to make such records
available may be grounds for debarment action pursuant to 29 CFR 5.12.

4. Apprentices and Trainees.
(i) Apprentices. Apprentices will be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work they
performed when they are employed pursuant to and
individually registered in a bona fide apprenticeship
program registered with the U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training Administration, Office of
Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, or with a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the
Office, or if a person is employed in his or her first 90 days of probationary employment as an apprentice in such an apprenticeship program, who is not individually
registered in the program, but who has been certified by the Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services or a State Apprenticeship Agency (where
appropriate) to be eligible for probationary employment as an apprentice. The allowable ratio of apprentices to
journeymen on the job site in any craft classification shall not be greater than the ratio permitted to the contractor as to the entire work force under the registered program. Any worker listed on a payroll at an apprentice wage rate, who is not registered or otherwise employed as stated above, shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed. In addition, any apprentice performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not less than the
applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the
work actually performed. Where a contractor is performing construction on a project in a locality other than that in which its program is registered, the ratios and wage rates (expressed in percentages of the journeyman’s hourly
rate) specified in the contractor’s or subcontractor’s
registered program shall be observed. Every apprentice
must be paid at not less than the rate specified in the registered program for the apprentice’s level of progress, expressed as a percentage of the journeymen hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination.

Apprentices shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the apprenticeship program. If the apprenticeship program does not specify fringe benefits, apprentices must be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination for the applicable
classification. If the Administrator determines that a
different practice prevails for the applicable apprentice classification, fringes shall be paid in accordance with that determination. In the event the Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, or a State
Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Office,
withdraws approval of an apprenticeship program, the
contractor will no longer be permitted to utilize
apprentices at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is
approved.
(ii) Trainees. Except as provided in 29 CFR 5.16,
trainees will not be permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the work performed unless they are employed pursuant ‘,to and individually registered in a program which has received prior approval, evidenced by formal certification by the U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training Administration. The ratio of
trainees to journeymen on the job site shall not be greater than permitted under the plan approved by the
Employment and Training Administration. Every trainee
must be paid at not less than the rate specified in the approved program for the trainee’s level of progress,
expressed as a percentage of the journeyman hourly rate specified in the applicable wage determination. Trainees shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the
provisions of the trainee program. If the trainee program does not mention fringe benefits, trainees shall be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage
determination unless the Administrator of the Wage and
Hour Division determines that there is an apprenticeship program associated with the corresponding journeyman
wage rate on the wage determination which provides for
less than full fringe benefits for apprentices. Any
employee listed on the payroll at a trainee rate who is not registered and participating in a training plan approved by 232
Previous editions are obsolete

form HUD-4010 (06/2009)
ref. Handbook 1344.1
the Employment and Training Administration shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage
determination for the work actually performed. In addition, any trainee performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the work actually performed. In the
event the Employment and Training Administration
withdraws approval of a training program, the contractor will no longer be permitted to utilize trainees at less than the applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable program is approved.
(iii) Equal employment opportunity. The utilization of
apprentices, trainees and journeymen under 29 CFR Part 5 shall be in conformity with the equal employment
opportunity requirements of Executive Order 11246, as
amended, and 29 CFR Part 30.

5. Compliance with Copeland Act requirements. The
contractor shall comply with the requirements of 29 CFR Part 3 which are incorporated by reference in this contract

6. Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor will
insert in any subcontracts the clauses contained in
subparagraphs 1 through 11 in this paragraph A and such other clauses as HUD or its designee may by appropriate instructions require, and a copy of the applicable
prevailing wage decision, and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier
subcontractor with all the contract clauses in this
paragraph.

7. Contract termination; debarment. A breach of the
contract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5 may be grounds for
termination of the contract and for debarment as a
contractor and a subcontractor as provided in 29 CFR

5.12. 8. Compliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act Requirements.

All rulings and interpretations of the Davis-Bacon and
Related Acts contained in 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, and 5 are
herein incorporated by reference in this contract

9. Disputes concerning labor standards. Disputes
arising out of the labor standards provisions of this
contract shall not be subject to the general disputes
clause of this contract. Such disputes shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures of the Department of
Labor set forth in 29 CFR Parts 5, 6, and 7. Disputes
within the meaning of this clause include disputes between the contractor (or any of its subcontractors) and HUD or its designee, the U.S. Department of Labor, or the
employees or their representatives.

10. (i) Certification of Eligibility. By entering into this contract the contractor certifies that neither it (nor he or she) nor any person or firm who has an interest in the
contractor’s firm is a person or firm ineligible to be
awarded Government contracts by virtue of Section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1) or to be
awarded HUD contracts or participate in HUD programs
pursuant to 24 CFR Part 24.
(ii) No part of this contract shall be subcontracted to any person or firm ineligible for award of a Government
contract by virtue of Section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1) or to be awarded HUD contracts or
participate in HUD programs pursuant to 24 CFR Part 24. (iii) The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in the U.S. Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C. 1001. Additionally, U.S. Criminal Code, Section 1 01 0, Title 18, U.S.C.,
“Federal Housing Administration transactions”, provides in part: “Whoever, for the purpose of . . . influencing in any way the action of such Administration..... makes, utters or publishes any statement knowing the same to be false..... shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not
more than two years, or both.”

11. Complaints, Proceedings, or Testimony by
Employees. No laborer or mechanic to whom the wage,
salary, or other labor standards provisions of this Contract are applicable shall be discharged or in any other manner discriminated against by the Contractor or any
subcontractor because such employee has filed any
complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any
proceeding or has testified or is about to testify in any proceeding under or relating to the labor standards
applicable under this Contract to his employer.

B. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. The
provisions of this paragraph B are applicable where the amount of the prime contract exceeds $100,000. As used in this paragraph, the terms “laborers” and “mechanics” include watchmen and guards. (1) Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which the individual is employed on such work to work in excess of 40 hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives
compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in such workweek.
(2) Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated
damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, the contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and
subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of
Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such
territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated
damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards,
employed in violation of the clause set forth in
subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of 40 hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in sub paragraph (1) of this paragraph.
233
Previous editions are obsolete

form HUD-4010 (06/2009)
ref. Handbook 1344.1
(3) Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated
damages. HUD or its designee shall upon its own action
or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contract, or any other Federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act which is
held by the same prime contractor such sums as may be
determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and
liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph.
(4) Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in
subparagraph (1) through (4) of this paragraph and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these
clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime
contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any
subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in subparagraphs (1) through (4) of this
paragraph.

C. Health and Safety. The provisions of this paragraph C are applicable where the amount of the prime contract exceeds $100,000. (1) No laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are
unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to his health and
safety as determined under construction safety and health standards promulgated by the Secretary of Labor by
regulation.
(2) The Contractor shall comply with all regulations
issued by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Title 29 Part 1926 and failure to comply may result in imposition of
sanctions pursuant to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, (Public Law 91-54, 83 Stat 96). 40 USC
3701 et seq.
(3) The contractor shall include the provisions of this paragraph in every subcontract so that such provisions will be binding on each subcontractor. The contractor shall
take such action with respect to any subcontractor as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development or the
Secretary of Labor shall direct as a means of enforcing such provisions.
234
235
236
Equal Employment Opportunity is

THE LAW
Employers
Holding Federal
Contracts or
Subcontracts
Applicants to and employees of
companies with a Federal government
contract or subcontract are
protected under the following
Federal authorities:

RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN
Executive Order 11246, as amended,
prohibits job discrimination on the
basis of race, color, religion, sex or
national origin, and requires affirmative
action to ensure equality of
opportunity in all aspects of
employment.

INDIVIDUALS WITH

DISABILITIES
Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended, prohibits job
discrimination because of disability
and requires affirmative action to
employ and advance in employment
qualified individuals with disabilities
who, with reasonable accommodation,
can perform the essential functions
of a job.

VIETNAM ERA, SPECIAL

DISABLED, RECENTLY

SEPARATED, AND OTHER

PROTECTED VETERANS
The Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment
Assistance Act of 1974, as amended, 38 U.S.C.,
4212, prohibits job discrimination and requires
affirmative action to employ and advance in
employment qualified Vietnam era veterans, qualified
special disabled veterans, recently separated
veterans, and other protected veterans. A recently
separated veteran is any veteran during the threeyear period beginning on the date of such veteran's discharge or release from active duty in the U.S.
military, ground, naval or air service.

RETALIATION
Retaliation is prohibited against a person who files a
charge of discrimination, participates in an OFCCP
proceeding, or otherwise opposes discrimination
under these Federal laws.

Any person who believes a contractor has violated
its nondiscrimination or affirmative action obligations under the authorities above should contact
immediately:

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs (OFCCP), Employment Standards
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210,
(202) 693-0101 or call an OFCCP regional or district
office listed in most telephone directories under U.S.

Government, Department of Labor. For individuals
with hearing impairment, OFCCP’s TTY number is
(202) 693-1337.

Private Employment,
State and Local Governments,
Educational Institutions,
Employment Agencies and
Labor Organizations
Applicants to and employees of
most private employers, state
and local governments,
educational institutions,
employment agencies
and labor organizations are
protected under the following
Federal laws:

RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, prohibits
discrimination in hiring,
promotion, discharge, pay, fringe
benefits, job training,
classification, referral, and other
aspects of employment, on the
basis of race, color, religion, sex
(including pregnancy and sexual
harassment) or national origin.

Religious discrimination includes
failing to reasonably
accommodate an employee’s
religious practices where the
accommodation does not impose
undue hardship.

DISABILITY
Title I and Title V of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (ADA), as amended,
protect qualified applicants and
employees with disabilities from
discrimination in hiring,
promotion, discharge, pay, job
training, fringe benefits,
classification, referral, and other
aspects of employment on the
basis of disability.

The law also requires that
covered entities provide qualified
applicants and employees with
disabilities with reasonable
accommodations, unless such
accommodations would impose
an undue hardship on the
employer.

AGE
The Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, as
amended, protects applicants
and employees 40 years of age
or older from discrimination on
the basis of age in hiring,
promotion, discharge,
compensation, terms, conditions
or privileges of employment.

SEX (WAGES)
In addition to sex discrimination
prohibited by Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as
amended, prohibits sex
discrimination in payment of
wages to women and men
performing substantially equal work, in jobs that
require equal skill, effort and responsibility under
similar working conditions, in the same
establishment.

RETALIATION
Retaliation is prohibited against a person who files a
charge of discrimination, participates in a
discrimination proceeding, or otherwise opposes
discrimination under these Federal laws.

If you believe that you have been discriminated
against under any of the above laws, and to ensure
that you meet strict procedural timelines to preserve
the ability of EEOC to investigate your complaint and
to protect your right to file a private lawsuit, you
should immediately contact:

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC), Washington, DC 20507 or an
EEOC field office by calling toll free (1-800) 669-
4000. For individuals with hearing impairments,
EEOC’s toll free TTY number is 1-800 669-6820.

Programs or Activities Receiving
Federal Financial Assistance

RACE, COLOR, SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN
In addition to the protection of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of
race, color or national origin in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. Employment
discrimination is covered by Title VI if the primary
objective of the financial assistance is provision of
employment, or where employment discrimination
causes or may cause discrimination in providing
services under such programs.

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of
sex in educational programs or activities which
receive Federal assistance.

INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
Section, 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, prohibits employment discrimination on
the basis of disability in any program or activity which receives Federal financial assistance in the federal
government, public or private agency.

Discrimination is prohibited in all aspects of
employment against persons with disabilities who,
with or without reasonable accommodation, can
perform the essential functions of a job.

If you believe you have been discriminated against in
a program of any institution which receives Federal
assistance, you should contact immediately the
Federal agency providing such assistance.

Publication OFCCP 1420
Revised August 2008
237

LA IGUALDAD DE OPORTUNIDADES DE EMPLEO

ES LA LEY
Empleadores que tienen contratos o
subcontratos con el Gobierno Federal
Los empleados o postulantes a empleos de
compañías que tienen contratos o subcontratos del
gobierno federal gozan de la protección otorgada por
las siguientes instituciones federales:

RAZA, COLOR, RELIGIÓN, SEXO,

NACIONALIDAD
El Decreto 11246 (Executive Order 11246), con sus
modificaciones, prohíbe la discriminación laboral en
razón de raza, color de piel, religión, sexo o
nacionalidad, y requiere la acción afirmativa para
garantizar la igualdad de oportunidades en todos los
aspectos laborales.

PERSONAS CON DISCAPACIDADES
El Artículo 503 de la Ley de Rehabilitación de
1973(The Rehabilitation Act of 1973), con sus
modificaciones, prohíbe la discriminación laboral por
discapacidad y requiere la acción afirmativa de
emplear y avanzar en el empleo de personas
discapacitadas idóneas que, mediante una
adaptación razonable, puedan llevar a cabo las
funciones esenciales de un trabajo.

VETERANOS DE VIETNAM CON

DISCAPACIDADES ESPECIALES,

RECIENTEMENTE RETIRADOS Y OTROS
VETERANOS BAJO PROTECCIÓN
La Ley de Asistencia a la Readaptación de
Veteranos de Vietnam de 1974 (The Vietnam Era
Vererans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974), y
sus modificaciones, 38 U.S.C., 4212, prohíbe toda
discriminación laboral y requiere la acción afirmativa
de emplear y avanzar en el empleo de veteranos de
Vietnam idóneos, veteranos idóneos con
discapacidades especiales, veteranos recientemente
retirados y otros veteranos bajo protección. Un
veterano recientemente retirado es todo veterano
durante el período de tres años a partir de la fecha
en que fue dado de baja o dejó el servicio activo en
el Ejército, la Marina o la Fuerza Aérea de los EE.

UU.

REPRESALIA
Queda prohibida toda represalia contra una persona
que presenta un cargo de discriminación, participa
en un procedimiento del Programa OFCCP o, de
alguna otra manera, se opone a la discriminación de
conformidad con las leyes federales.

Toda persona que cree que un contratista ha violado
sus obligaciones de no discriminación o acción
afirmativa, según las fuentes anteriores, debe
ponerse en contacto de inmediato con:

La Oficina de Programas de Cumplimiento de
Contratos Federales (The Office of Federal Contract
Compliance Programs-OFCCP), Employment
Standards Administration, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC
20210, (202) 693-0101 o llamar a una oficina de la
OFCCP regional o de distrito consignada en la
mayor parte de los directorios telefónicos en U.S.

Government, Department of Labor (Gobierno de los
EE.UU., Departamento de Trabajo). Para personas
con discapacidad auditiva, el número TTY de la
OFCCP es (202) 693-1337.

Empleo privado, gobiernos estatales y locales,
instituciones educativas, agencias de empleo y
organizaciones laborales
Los empleados y postulantes a
empleos de la mayor parte de los
empleadores privados, gobiernos
estatales y locales, instituciones
educativas, agencias de empleo
y organizaciones laborales gozan
de la protección otorgada por las
siguientes leyes federales:

RAZA, COLOR, RELIGIÓN,

SEXO, NACIONALIDAD
La Ley de Derechos Civiles de
1964, Título VII (The Civil Rights
Act of 1990), y sus
modificaciones, prohíbe toda
discriminación en relación con la
contratación, ascenso, despido,
remuneración, compensaciones
adicionales, capacitación,
clasificación, referencias, y otros
aspectos laborales, en razón de
la raza, el color de la piel, la
religión, el sexo (incluidos
embarazo y acoso sexual) o la
nacionalidad. Por discriminación
religiosa se entiende, entre otros,
la falta de adaptación razonable
para las prácticas religiosas de
un empleado siempre que la
adaptación no provoque una
dificultad económica excesiva.

DISCAPACIDAD
La ley de Estadounidenses con
Discapacidades de 1990 (The
Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990-ADA), Títulos I y V, con sus
modificaciones, protege a
empleados y postulantes idóneos
con discapacidades contra la
discriminación en relación con la
contratación, ascenso, despido,
remuneración, capacitación,
beneficios adicionales,
clasificación, referencias y otros
aspectos laborales en razón de la
discapacidad.

La ley también requiere que las
entidades contempladas provean
las adaptaciones razonables que
necesiten los empleados y
postulantes con discapacidades,
a menos que esas adaptaciones
causen una dificultad económica
excesiva al empleador.

EDAD
La Ley de Discriminación Laboral
por Edad de 1967 (The Age
Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967), con sus modificaciones,
protege a los empleados y
postulantes de 40 años o más
contra la discriminación por edad
en relación con la contratación,
ascenso, despido,
compensaciones, condiciones o
privilegios laborales.

SEXO (SALARIOS)
Además de la discriminación
sexual prohibida por la Ley de
Derechos Civiles de 1964, Título
VII, y sus modificaciones, la Ley
de Igualdad en las
Remuneraciones de 1963, con sus modificaciones,
prohíbe la discriminación sexual en el pago de
salarios a mujeres y hombres que básicamente
realicen igual trabajo, en empleos que requieren
igual capacidad, esfuerzo y responsabilidad, en
condiciones laborales similares y en el mismo
establecimiento.

REPRESALIA
Queda prohibida toda represalia contra una persona
que presenta un cargo de discriminación, participa
en un procedimiento de contra la discriminación o,
de alguna otra manera, se opone a la discriminación
de conformidad con las leyes federales.

Si cree que ha sufrido alguna discriminación, de
conformidad con algunas de las leyes anteriores, y
para garantizar que cumple con los estrictos
cronogramas procesales a fin de preservar la
capacidad de la EEOC para investigar su queja y
para proteger su derecho a iniciar una demanda
privada, debe ponerse en contacto de inmediato
con:

La Comisión Federal de Igualdad de Oportunidades
de Empleo de los EE.UU. (The US Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission-EEOC),
Washington, DC 20507 ó con una oficina de la
EEOC telefónicamente a la línea gratuita (1-800)
669-4000. Para las personas con discapacidad
auditiva, la línea gratuita TTY de la EEOC es 1-800
669-6820.

Programas o actividades que reciben apoyo
financiero federal

RAZA, COLOR, SEXO, NACIONALIDAD
Además del Título VII de la Ley de Derechos Civiles
de 1964, con sus modificaciones, el Título VI de la
misma ley prohíbe la discriminación por raza, color
de piel o nacionalidad en programas y actividades
que reciben apoyo financiero federal. La
discriminación laboral está contemplada en el Título
VI si el objetivo principal del apoyo financiero es la
provisión de empleo, o siempre que la discriminación
laboral cause, o pueda causar, discriminación en la
provisión de servicios en el marco de esos
programas.

El Titulo IX de las Modificaciones de 1972 a la Ley
de Educación (Education Amendments of 1972)
prohíbe la discriminación laboral en razón de sexo
en los programas o actividades educativas que
reciben apoyo federal.

PERSONAS CON DISCAPACIDADES
El Artículo 504 de la Ley de Rehabilitación de 1973 ,
con sus modificaciones, prohíbe la discriminación
laboral por discapacidad en todo programa o
actividad que recibe apoyo financiero federal en el
gobierno federal y las agencias públicas o privadas.

Queda prohibida la discriminación en todos los
aspectos laborales contra personas con
discapacidades que puedan realizar las tareas
esenciales relacionadas con ese puesto, sin
perjuicio de que resulte o no necesario efectuar una
adaptación razonable
Si cree que ha sufrido discriminación en relación con
un programa de cualquier institución que reciba
apoyo federal, debe contactarse de inmediato con la
agencia federal que brinda ese apoyo.

Publicación OFCCP 1420
Se revisó en agosto de 2008
238
County Lobbyist Certification
(Print Name of Contractor’s Authorized Representative) (Signature of Contractor’s Authorized Representative) (Title) (Date)
239

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMITMENT
240
241
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

REPORT OF ADDITIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND RATE
HUD FORM 4230A
OMB Approval Number 2501-0011
(Exp. 01/31/2010)

1. FROM (name and address of requesting agency) 2. PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER

3. LOCATION OF PROJECT (City, County and State)

4. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 5. CHARACTER OF CONSTRUCTION Building
Heavy
Highway
Residential
Other (specify)

6. WAGE DECISION NO. (include modification number, if any)

COPY ATTACHED

7. WAGE DECISION EFFECTIVE DATE

8. WORK CLASSIFICATION(S) HOURLY WAGE RATES
BASIC WAGE FRINGE BENEFIT(S) (if any)

9. PRIME CONTRACTOR (name, address) 10. SUBCONTRACTOR/EMPLOYER, IF APPLICABLE (name, address) Check All That Apply:

The work to be performed by the additional classification(s) is not performed by a classification in the applicable wage decision.

The proposed classification is utilized in the area by the construction industry.

The proposed wage rate(s), including any bona fide fringe benefits, bears a reasonable relationship to the wage rates contained in the wage decision.

The interested parties, including the employees or their authorized representatives, agree on the classification(s) and wage rate(s).

Supporting documentation attached, including applicable wage decision.

Check One:

Approved, meets all criteria. DOL confirmation requested.

One or more classifications fail to meet all criteria as explained in agency referral. DOL decision requested.

FOR HUD USE ONLY
LR2000:

Agency Representative
(Typed name and signature)
Date
Log in:

Log out:

Phone Number
HUD-4230A (8-03) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257

NONCOLLUSION DECLARATION TO BE EXECUTED BY BIDDER AND SUBMITTED WITH BID The undersigned declares:

I am the ____ of ____, the party making the foregoing bid.

The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on ___[date], at ___[city], ___[state]." 258
259
260
261
Certification of Understanding and Authorization
This certification is required when a Payroll Officer is not listed on the business license (03/30/17)
The contractor certifies, by signature below, that the designated payroll officer has received a copy of the federal wage decision assigned to this project as identified below;
The payroll officer acknowledges, by signature below, that she/he have also received, read, and understands the following provision and publication;
Federal Labor Standards Provisions (HUD-4010 form), and Contractor’s Guide to Prevailing Wage Requirements for Federally-Assisted Construction Projects.

Further, the person designated as the Payroll Officer understands the labor standards reporting requirements applicable to the above listed project, and she/he is hereby authorized to sign the Statement of Compliance form that will accompany each weekly payroll report for this project on behalf of the contractor.

Contractor’s Business Name License Number
Print Name of Owner or Principal listed on the business license Signature of Owner or Principal listed on the business license Title Date
Print Name of Payroll Officer Signature of Payroll Officer Contractor Name:

Project Name: CDBG Project Number:

Project Location:

Local Contracting Agency (LCA):

Labor Standards Officer (LSO): Telephone:

CA Modification Number Dated
262
Certified Payroll Reports (CPRs) – The California Public Works Payroll form is the preferred form and format; however, contractors may use any form as long as it contains all of the information required to complete the Public Works Payroll form. CPRs must be submitted each week with an original Statement of Compliance form attached. Contractors who submit unacceptable payroll or Statement of Compliance form must resubmit on an appropriate form. If any of the required information is missing, the contractor must submit a corrected CPR. In no case will the original payroll report be returned to the contractor.

Reviewing the CPR – The Prime Contractor should review all subcontractor’s CPR and supporting documentation for accuracy and completeness ensuring that:

Work classifications conform to Federal Wage Decision
Apprentice Status Letter is attached to the CPR were an apprentice is first reported.

Hourly wage and fringe benefit rates conform to the Federal Wage Decision.

Fringe benefits were paid into approved plans or to the worker.

All over-time hours worked are reported and paid in accordance with the Federal Wage Decision.

All “Other” deductions are documented and authorized by the worker signature Statement of Compliance has a wet signature is attached to each CPR.

All CPR’s are current, within two (2) weeks of any payment request.

CPR’s are numbered sequentially and the last payroll is annotated as Final Name, Address and Social Security Numbers – Each worker’s name, address, and social security number must be available in order to resolve any allegations of underpayments. Contractors may use an assigned Employee Identification Number (EID) to identify workers on the CPR, but, the contractor must provide you with a Confidential List of Workers on their company letterhead. The list must include; the employee’s name, assigned EID number, address, and social security number for all employees working at the project site. The Confidential List will be kept in the project file and is not to be made available or copies released to anyone.

Prior to release, you must redact all confidential information on any copies of CPR’s requested by any authorized agency or in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Work Classifications and Wage Fringe Benefit Rates – must be compared with the assigned Federal Wage Decision and any field interview forms to confirm all workers are working in their proper work classification and are paid hourly wage rates that are equal to or greater than the wage rates listed in the wage decision. If work classifications and wage rates reported on the CPRs do not match the Federal wage decision, you must, without exception, contact the contractor(s) to clarify the workers appropriate status and, in necessary, make restitution payment to the worker(s) and submit a revised CPR.

Owner-Operator – Owner-Operators, such as truck drivers must submit the “Owner-Operator Listing” report to the prime contractor, who will then certify its accuracy by attaching a WH-348 Statement of Compliance form and forward it to the LCA. However, sole-owners of a business who are working without a crew cannot certify their own payroll and must be listed on the prime contractor’s payroll report.

Apprentices and Trainees – A copy of the worker’s Apprentice Status Letter from the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards (DAS) or the Federal Bureau of Apprenticeship Training (BAT) must be attached to the first CPR where an apprentice or trainee is reported. Verification of Apprentice Status can be made on-line at; http://www.dir.ca.gov/DAS/appcertpw/AppCertSearch.asp Hourly Wage and Fringe Benefit Rate – The LCA must ensure that each worker is paid no less than once a week, the full amount of hourly wages and fringe benefits that are listed on the assigned Federal wage decision for the appropriate work classification. The term “wages” means the basic hourly rate of pay, plus fringe benefits, including any contribution paid by the contractor into a bona fide fringe benefit fund, plan or program or in cash to the worker. Benefits include medical or hospital care, retirement pensions, unemployment benefits, life insurance, vacation or holiday pay or similar programs.

Over-time – Federal Labor Standards Provisions state that workers are to be paid 1 and ½ times their basic hourly wage rate, plus the hourly fringe benefit, for all hours worked over 40-hours in a week. However, the State Labor Code requires workers to be paid for all hours worked over 8 in a day. CDC will monitor your project for compliance with the Federal funding program requirements, but in the event of a labor dispute, State investigators may impose the more stringent requirement as a result of their investigation.

Other Deductions – Your review must ensure that contractors do not make payroll deductions that are not allowed by law. Deductions may include taxes, Social Security payments, insurance premiums, retirement, savings accounts, and any other legally-permissible deduction authorized by the worker. Deductions may also be made for payments on judgments and other financial obligations legally imposed against the worker. A copy of the court order or judgment can be accepted as support documentation only if the worker is unable to provide a signed Employee Authorization form.

Field Interviews – Monitoring also involves conducting on-site interviews with the workers employed at the job site using the Record of Employee Interview, HUD-11 form (Field Interview form), and performing regular detailed reviews of each contractor’s weekly Certified Payroll Reports (CPRs). It is essential that you completely fill in all blanks on the Field Interview form, your comments and observations may be helpful in the event of a labor dispute. In addition, you should provide each worker with a Prevailing Wage Notice, in English and in Spanish, you interview them. A representative sample of the workers in each trade at the project site. The minimum number of workers to be interviewed on projects less than $100,000 is 10% of each trade. However, the minimum number of workers to be interviewed on a project with a construction contract of $100,000 or more is 20% of each trade working at the project site. No person is exempt from participating in the field interview. A Contractor’s refusal to participate and allow you to conduct field interviews may be grounds for suspension of payment, contract cancellation or debarment proceedings. The interview shall be conducted on the premises, at a place and for a duration that shall permit privacy for the worker and cause the least amount of disruption to the on-going work.
263

AGENCY REPORT OF CONTRACT AWARD
(2015)
TO: Program Manager/Contract Compliance Officer, Grants Management Unit Date: ______________ Community Development Commission, County of Los Angeles _________________________________________________ _________________ ____________________________ Project Name Project Number Agency’s Primary Contact Person _________________________________________________ ____________________________ __________________ Name of the ocal ontracting gency (LCA) LCA – abor tandards fficer’s Name LSO Initials

1. This Agency reports the date for formal bid opening, or informal solicitation for this construction contract was: _______________

2. This Contract Subcontract was awarded to the contractor identified below on _____________ (Date) The contract amount for the construction activity to be performed by this Contractor, as detailed below, is: $ ___________________

IDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS CONTRACTOR Estimated Start Date: Estimated Completion Date:

IDENTIFY THE TRADES TO BE USED BY THIS CONTRACTOR AT THE CONSTRUCITON SITE Estimated Workforce:

Asbestos Worker Equipment Operator Group Lather Roofer
Bricklayer Glazier Marble setter Sheet metal worker
Carpenter Ironworker Painter Terrazzo Worker
Cement Mason Laborer Group Plasterer Tile layer
Electrician Labor/Striper Group Plumber (other)

3. This is a Section 3 qualified contract and a Section 3 Pre-Bid Meeting was held on ____________ (Date) N/A A copy of the completed Section 3 Bid Evaluation form was provided to the CDC on ___________ (Date) N/A

4. The LCA verified this Contractor’s Eligibility prior to contract award and documented the project file with search results from:

The List of Parties Excluded from federal contract award internet website (https://www.sam.gov) on ___________ (Date) The California Contractors State Licensing Board (CSLB) internet website (http://www.cslb.ca.gov) on ___________ (Date) The California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) internet website (https://efiling.dir.ca.gov) on ___________ (Date)

5. The Contractor(s) acknowledge, by signature below, that: “This construction project is funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.”

6. A copy of the Federal Labor Standards Provisions (HUD-4010 form), is attached to the contractor’s copy of this form.

7. A copy of the applicable Federal Wage Decision (identified below) is attached to the contractor’s copy of this form.

Federal Wage Decision Number: CA _____________ Mod. ____, DATED _____________ (http://www.wdol.gov/).

8. The Contractor(s) further acknowledge that federal prevailing wage and fringe benefit rates must be paid to all workers each week.

9. The LCA sent a Notice of Contract Award letter to the U.S. Dept. of Labor, OFCCP (contracts $10,000 or more) on ________ (Date) N/A _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________ PRINT – Prime Contractor Subcontractor Company Name PRINT – Prime Sub Lower-tier Contractor Company Name Signature: ______________________________________
Print Name: ____________________________________
Title: __________________________________________
Address: ______________________________________
______________________________________
Employer Identification Number: _____________________
Contractor License Number: ________________________
Signature: ______________________________________
Print Name: ____________________________________
Title: __________________________________________
Address: ______________________________________
______________________________________
Employer Identification Number: _____________________
Contractor License Number: ________________________
Black American
White American
Hispanic American
Women Owned Business
Minority Owned Business
Section 3 Qualified Business
Native American
Hasidic Jews
Asian/Pacific American
Black American
White American
Hispanic American
Women Owned Business
Minority Owned Business
Section 3 Qualified Business
Native American
Hasidic Jews
Asian/Pacific American 264

GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING THE FORM
The Agency Report of Contract Award (ARCA) form is designed to protect the interest of all parties concerned and should be completed at the preconstruction conference. Send a copy of the completed form to the GMU Program Manager/Contract Compliance Officer via email. The ARCA will be processed as follows:

Local Contracting Agency (LCA) must;
o Enter the basic project information on the form,
o Enter the dollar amount of the Prime Contract
o Explain the prevailing wage requirements as outlined in the specifications, o Do not sign the form until it is returned, completed by the prime and/or sub, o Collect form from the contractor and review for accuracy, o Sign and fax or email completed forms to the CDBG Reporting Unit.

Prime Contractor must;
o Provide an estimated start and end date, and a summary the Scope of Work, o Identify the basic trades and number of workers to be used on site, o Complete lower left section – business address and EEO portion, and o Sign and return the form to the LCA.
o For Subcontractor form, provide the dollar amount of each subcontract Ensure subcontractor has a copy of the HUD-4010 form & Federal Wage Decision Collect form from the subcontractor, review it for accuracy, and forward to LCA.

Subcontractor must;
o Provide an estimated start and end date, and a summary the Scope of Work, o Identify the basic trades and number of workers to be used on site, o Complete lower right section – business address and EEO portion, and o Sign and return the form to the Prime Contractor.

1. Date of formal Bid Opening or Informal Solicitation Date: LCA identifies the date of formal bid opening was held. For an informal solicitation, the date that the contractor signed a construction contract with the LCA.

2. Contract Award Date: Prime Contracts, the date an agreement was signed with the LCA.

Subcontracts, the date an agreement was signed with the prime contractor.

3. Section 3 Qualified Contracts: The agency’s LSO or Section 3 Coordinator will conduct a presentation at the Section 3 Pre-Bid Meeting. The meeting must be held by the LCA to inform prospective bidders of hiring and employment requirements and the bid preference opportunity allowed by the Section 3 requirements. Also, during the bid evaluations, the LCA will include a Section 3 analysis to determine each bidder’s Section 3 Responsiveness and provide CDC with a copy of their evaluation.

4. Contractor Eligibility: Prior to awarding any contract or subcontract the LCA must ensure that each contractor is eligible to receive a federally-funded construction contract. Ensuring that each contractor’s license is current and active is part of the LCA bid evaluation process and the eligibility check includes:

1. Obtaining the state license number of each bidder and proposed sub-contractor

2. Contact the CA Contractor State License Board at (800) 321-2752 or on-line at http://www.cslb.ca.gov

3. Enter the contractor’s license number and click on “Check License”

4. The License Detail page will display; Business Information, License Status, Personnel List, etc.

5. Print a copy of this page to assist in completing the contractor’s eligibility verification.

6. Access the CA Department of Industrial Relations website (https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/Search.action)

7. Access the Federal List of Excluded Parties on-line at https://www.sam.gov/

8. Enter the business name and all personnel as they appear on the license search

9. The results of your search will be displayed, print a copy and place it in your Labor Standards Enforcement file

5. Contractor Acknowledgement: acknowledges that the project is federally-funded and the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts will be administered, monitored, and enforced by the LCA, or their assigned representative, in accordance with the Federal Labor Standards Provisions.

6. Federal Labor Standards Provisions: A copy of the current HUD-4010 form that outlines the labor requirements for each contractor must be included in the bid specifications for all formal competitive bids, or physically attached to each Prime Contract awarded for informal contracts under $25,000. The Prime Contractor must attach a current copy of the HUD-4010 form to each subcontract.

7. Federal Wage Decision: A copy of the current Wage Decision that identifies the minimum hourly wage and fringe benefit payments to workers must also be included in the bid specifications for all formal competitive bids, or physically attached to each Prime Contract awarded for informal contracts under $2,000.

The Prime Contractor must attach a copy of the applicable Wage Decision and HUD-4010 form to each subcontractor ARCA to ensure that each subcontractor was informed of his/her obligation to pay prevailing hourly wages and fringe benefits to workers each week.

8. Contractor’s Acknowledgement: Federal prevailing wage and fringe benefits rates must be paid to workers each week.

9. Notice of Contract Award: For all contracts awarded in the amount of $10,000 or more, the LCA must ensure that a “Notice of Contract Award” letter is sent to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) at the address below and a copy of the signed letter must be placed in the project file.

U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs 1640 South Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 440
Los Angeles, CA 90024
265
Any other deductions, contributions and/or payments whether or not included or required by prevailing CERTIFICATION MUST be completed Form A-1-131 (New 2-80) O = OVERTIME wage determinations must be separately listed. Use extra sheet(s) if necessary (See reverse side) California Department of SDI = STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE Industrial Relations Page ______ of ______ NAME OF CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NO.: ADDRESS: OR SUBCONTRACTOR: SPECIALITY LICENSE NO.: PAYROLL NO.: FOR WEEK ENDING: SELF-INSURED CERTIFICATE NO.: PROJECT OR CONTRACT NO.: (4) DAY (5) (6) WORKERS' COMPENSATION POLICY NO.: PROJECT AND LOCATION: (2) M T W TH F S S (9) DATE (1) NAME, ADDRESS AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF EMPLOYEE NO. OF WITH- HOLDING EXEMPTIONS (3) WORK CLASSIFICATION HOURS WORKED EACH DAY TOTAL HOURS HOURLY RATE OF PAY (7) GROSS AMOUNT EARNED (8) DEDUCTIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS AND PAYMENTS NET WGS PAID FOR WEEK CHECK NO. THIS PROJECT ALL PROJECTS FED. TAX FICA (SOC. SEC.) STATE TAX SDI VAC/ HOLIDAY HEALTH & WELF. PENSION S TRAING. FUND ADMIN DUES TRAV/ SUBS. SAVINGS OTHER* TOTAL DEDUC- TIONS O THIS PROJECT ALL PROJECTS FED. TAX FICA (SOC. SEC.) STATE TAX SDI VAC/ HOLIDAY HEALTH & WELF. PENSION S TRAING. FUND ADMIN DUES TRAV/ SUBS. SAVINGS OTHER* TOTAL DEDUC- TIONS O THIS PROJECT ALL PROJECTS FED. TAX FICA (SOC. SEC.) STATE TAX SDI VAC/ HOLIDAY HEALTH & WELF. PENSION S TRAING. FUND ADMIN DUES TRAV/ SUBS. SAVINGS OTHER* TOTAL DEDUC- TIONS O THIS PROJECT ALL PROJECTS FED. TAX FICA (SOC. SEC.) STATE TAX SDI VAC/ HOLIDAY HEALTH & WELF. PENSION S TRAING. FUND ADMIN DUES TRAV/ SUBS. SAVINGS OTHER* TOTAL DEDUC- TIONS O PUBLIC WORKS PAYROLL REPORTING FORM 266
267
268
EXHIBIT “D” – CONTRACTOR GUIDE TO DAVIS-BACON
CIP NO. 601 & 698

CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
269
January 2012
Previous versions obsolete
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Labor Relations Desk Guide
LR01.DG

DAVIS-BACON

LABOR STANDARDS
A Contractor’s Guide
to Prevailing Wage Requirements
for Federally-Assisted Construction Projects
270
271
i

INTRODUCTION
This Guide has been prepared for you as a contractor performing work on construction projects that are assisted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and subject to DavisBacon prevailing wage requirements. This Guide does not address contractor requirements involved in direct Federal contracting where HUD or another Federal agency enters into a procurement contract. In this latter case, the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) are applicable. While the guidance contained in this Guide is generally applicable to any Davis-Bacon covered project, specific questions pertaining to direct Federal contracts should be addressed to the Contracting Officer who signed the contract for the Federal agency.

Our objective here is to provide you with a guide which is simple and non-bureaucratic yet comprehensive and which will help you better understand and comply with Davis-Bacon labor standards. HUD’s Office of Labor Relations worked closely with the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division to make sure that the labor standards provisions in your contract and the specifics of complying with them represent the latest information. It is the Department of Labor which has general administrative oversight of all Federal contracting agencies, such as HUD, which administer the day-to-day responsibilities of enforcing Davis-Bacon provisions in construction contracts they either fund or assist in funding.

There are three chapters in this Guide. The first chapter offers a brief description of the laws and regulations associated with Federal labor standards administration and enforcement and discusses both what’s in your contract that requires Davis-Bacon compliance and your responsibilities. The second chapter deals with labor standards and payroll reporting requirements.

The third chapter discusses what can happen in the event there is a dispute about the wage rates that should be (or have been) paid and any back wages that may be due.

Finally, not all HUD construction projects are covered by Davis-Bacon wage rates. For the purpose of this Guide, we are assuming that a determination has already been made that DavisBacon wage rates are applicable. Should you wish assistance in determining whether DavisBacon wage rates apply to a particular project or if you need other related technical assistance, please consult with the HUD Labor Relations Field staff for your area. If you don’t know which staff to contact, a list of Labor Relations field offices and their geographic areas and telephone numbers can be found on HUD’s Home Page at the address below.

Visit the Office of Labor Relations on-line:
http://www.hud.gov/offices/olr
Obtain additional copies of this Guide and other publications at our website or by telephone from HUD’s Customer Service Center at (800)767-7468.
272
273
iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................i CHAPTER 1 LAWS, REGULATIONS, CONTRACTS
AND RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................1-1 1-1 DAVIS-BACON AND OTHER LABOR LAWS. .......................................................1-1 a. The Davis-Bacon Act (DBA)...............................................................................1-1 b. The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA)......................1-1 c. The Copeland Act (Anti-Kickback Act)................................................................1-2 d. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)................................................................1-2 1-2 DAVIS-BACON REGULATIONS.............................................................................1-2 1-3 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROVISIONS .......................................................1-2 1-4 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR......................................1-3 1-5 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR.................................1-4 CHAPTER 2 HOW TO COMPLY WITH LABOR STANDARDS
AND PAYROLL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .............................2-1

SECTION - I THE BASICS
2-1 THE WAGE DECISION ...........................................................................................2-1 a. The work classifications and wage rates............................................................2-1 b. Posting the wage decision..................................................................................2-2 2-2 ADDITIONAL “TRADE” CLASSIFICATIONS AND WAGE RATES.......................2-2 a. Additional classification rules .............................................................................2-2 b. Making the request.............................................................................................2-3 c. HUD review ........................................................................................................2-3 d. DOL decision......................................................................................................2-3 2-3 CERTIFIED PAYROLL REPORTS..........................................................................2-4 a. Payroll formats ...................................................................................................2-4 b. Payroll certifications ...........................................................................................2-4 c. “No work” payrolls ..............................................................................................2-4 d. Payroll review and submission...........................................................................2-5 e. Payroll retention .................................................................................................2-5 f. Payroll inspection ...............................................................................................2-5 2-4 DAVIS-BACON DEFINITIONS................................................................................2-5 a. Laborer or mechanic ..........................................................................................2-5 b. Employee ...........................................................................................................2-6 c. Apprentices and trainees....................................................................................2-6 d. Prevailing wages or wage rates .........................................................................2-7 e. Fringe benefits....................................................................................................2-7 f. Overtime.............................................................................................................2-7 g. Deductions .........................................................................................................2-8 h. Proper designation of trade................................................................................2-8 i. Site of work.........................................................................................................2-8 274
iv

SECTION - II REPORTING REQUIREMENT
2-5 COMPLETING A PAYROLL REPORT....................................................................2-9 a. Project and contractor/subcontractor information...............................................2-9 b. Employee information.........................................................................................2-9 c. Work classification..............................................................................................2-9 d. Hours worked .....................................................................................................2-10 e. Rate of pay.........................................................................................................2-10 f. Gross wages earned ..........................................................................................2-10 g. Deductions .........................................................................................................2-11 h. Net pay...............................................................................................................2-11 i. Statement of compliance....................................................................................2-11 j. Signature............................................................................................................2-11

SECTION III - PAYROLL REVIEWS AND CORRECTIONS
2-6 COMPLIANCE REVIEWS.......................................................................................2-12 a. On-site interviews...............................................................................................2-12 b. Project payroll reviews .......................................................................................2-12 2-7 TYPICAL PAYROLL ERRORS AND REQUIRED CORRECTIONS .......................2-12 a. Inadequate payroll information...........................................................................2-12 b. Missing identification numbers ...........................................................................2-12 c. Incomplete payrolls ............................................................................................2-13 d. Classifications ....................................................................................................2-13 e. Wage Rates........................................................................................................2-13 f. Apprentices and trainees....................................................................................2-13 g. Overtime.............................................................................................................2-13 h. Computations .....................................................................................................2-13 i. Deductions .........................................................................................................2-13 j. Fringe benefits....................................................................................................2-14 k. Signature............................................................................................................2-14 l. On-site interview comparisons ...........................................................................2-14 m. Correction certified payroll..................................................................................2-14 2-8 RESTITUTION FOR UNDERPAYMENT OF WAGES.............................................2-14 a. Notification..........................................................................................................2-14 b. Computing wage restitution................................................................................2-15 c. Correction certified payrolls................................................................................2-15 d. Review of correction CPR ..................................................................................2-15 e. Unfound workers ................................................................................................2-15 275
v
CHAPTER 3 LABOR STANDARDS DISPUTES, ADMINISTRATIVE

REVIEWS, WITHHOLDING, DEPOSITS AND ESCROW
ACCOUNTS, AND SANCTIONS.......................................................3-1 3-1 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................3-1 3-2 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW ON LABOR STANDARDS DISPUTES.....................3-1 a. Additional classifications and wage rates...........................................................3-1 b. Findings of underpayment..................................................................................3-2 3-3 WITHHOLDING.......................................................................................................3-2 3-4 DEPOSITS AND ESCROWS ..................................................................................3-3 3-5 ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS ............................................................................3-4 a. DOL debarment..................................................................................................3-4 b. HUD sanctions ...................................................................................................3-4 3-6 FALSIFICATION OF CERTIFIED PAYROLL REPORTS........................................3-5

APPENDICIES
ACRONYMS AND SYMBOLS...........................................................................................A-1 DAVIS-BACON - RELATED WEB SITES* ........................................................................A-2 HUD-4720, Project Wage Rate Sheet ..............................................................................A-3 WH-347, Payroll Form/Statement of Compliance ..........................................................A-4 276
277
1-1
CHAPTER 1 LAWS, REGULATIONS, CONTRACTS

AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following paragraphs describe what the labor standards laws and regulations actually say and what they mean to you on HUD projects:
1-1 DAVIS-BACON AND OTHER LABOR LAWS.
a. The Davis-Bacon Act (DBA). The Davis-Bacon Act requires the payment of prevailing wage rates (which are determined by the U.S. Department of Labor) to all laborers and mechanics on Federal government and District of Columbia construction projects in excess of $2,000. Construction includes alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of public buildings or public works.
b. The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA). CWHSSA requires time and one-half pay for overtime (O/T) hours (over 40 in any workweek) worked on the covered project. The CWHSSA applies to both direct Federal contracts and to indirect Federally-assisted contracts except where the assistance is solely in the nature of a loan guarantee or insurance. CWHSSA violations carry a liquidated damages penalty ($10/day per violation). Intentional violations of CWHSSA standards can be considered for Federal criminal prosecution.

CWHSSA does not apply to prime contracts of $100,000 or less. In addition, some HUD projects are not covered by CWHSSA because some HUD programs only provide loan guarantees or insurance. CWHSSA also does not apply to construction or rehabilitation contracts that are not subject to Federal prevailing wage rates (e.g., Davis-Bacon wage rates, or HUD-determined rates for operation of public housing and Indian block grantassisted housing). However, even though CWHSSA overtime pay is not required, Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime pay is probably still applicable. (See also Labor Relations Letter SL-95-01, CWHSSA Coverage threshold for overtime and health and safety provision, available on-line at the HUD Labor Relations Library at: www.hud.gov/ offices/olr/library.cfm)
Most HUD construction work is not covered by the DBA itself since HUD seldom contracts directly for construction services. Most often, if Davis-Bacon wage rates apply to a HUD project it is because of a labor provision contained in one of HUD’s “Related Acts” such as the U. S. Housing Act of 1937, the National Housing Act, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, and the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. The Related Acts are often referred to as the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts or DBRA. 278
1-2
c. The Copeland Act (Anti-Kickback Act). The Copeland Act makes it a Federal crime for anyone to require any laborer or mechanic (employed on a Federal or Federallyassisted project) to kickback (i.e., give up or pay back) any part of their wages. The Copeland Act requires every employer (contractors and subcontractors) to submit weekly certified payroll reports (CPRs) and regulates permissible payroll deductions. d. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA contains Federal minimum wage rates, overtime (O/T), and child labor requirements. These requirements generally apply to any labor performed. The DOL has the authority to administer and enforce FLSA.

HUD will refer to the DOL any possible FLSA violations that are found on HUD projects. 1-2 DAVIS-BACON REGULATIONS.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has published rules and instructions concerning Davis-Bacon and other labor laws in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). These regulations can be found in Title 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7. Part 1 explains how the DOL establishes and publishes DBA wage determinations (aka wage decisions) and provides instructions on how to use the determinations. Part 3 describes Copeland Act requirements for payroll deductions and the submission of weekly certified payroll reports.

Part 5 covers the labor standards provisions that are in your contract relating to DavisBacon Act wage rates and the responsibilities of contractors and contracting agencies to administer and enforce the provisions. Part 6 provides for administrative proceedings enforcing Federal labor standards on construction and service contracts. Last, Part 7 sets parameters for practice before the Administrative Review Board. These regulations are used as the basis for administering and enforcing the laws. 1-3 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROVISIONS
Each contract subject to Davis-Bacon labor standards requirements must contain labor standards clauses and a Davis-Bacon wage decision. These documents are normally bound into the contract specifications.
a. The labor standards clauses. The labor standards clauses describe the responsibilities of the contractor concerning Davis-Bacon wages and obligate the contractor to comply with the labor requirements. The labor standards clauses also provide for remedies in the event of violations, including withholding from payments due to the contractor to ensure the payment of wages or liquidated damages which may be found due. These contract clauses enable the contract administrator to enforce the Federal labor standards applicable to the project. HUD has standard forms that contain contract clauses. For example, the HUD-2554, Supplementary Conditions to the Contract for Construction, which is issued primarily for FHA multifamily housing and other construction projects DOL Regulations are available on-line on the World Wide Web:
http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/Title_29.htm
279
1-3
administered by HUD; the HUD-4010, Federal Labor Standards Provisions, which is used for CDBG and HOME projects, and the HUD-5370, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction or the HUD-5370-EZ (construction contracts ≤$100,000) which are used for Public and Indian Housing projects.
b. Davis-Bacon Wage Decisions. The Davis-Bacon wage decision (or wage determination) is a listing of various construction work classifications, such as Carpenter, Electrician, Plumber and Laborer, and the minimum wage rates (and fringe benefits, where prevailing) that people performing work in those classifications must be paid.

Davis-Bacon wage decisions are established by the DOL for various types of construction (e.g., residential, heavy, highway) and apply to specific geographic areas, usually a county or group of counties. Wage decisions are modified from time to time to keep them current. In most cases, when the contract is awarded or when construction begins, the wage decision is “locked-in” and no future modifications are applicable to the contract or project involved.
1-4 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR
The principal contractor (also referred to as the prime or general contractor) is responsible for the full compliance of all employers (the contractor, subcontractors and any lower-tier subcontractors) with the labor standards provisions applicable to the project. Because of the contractual relationship between a prime contractor and his/her subcontractors, subcontractors generally should communicate with the contract administrator only through the prime contractor. (See Contract Administrator, below.) To make this Guide easier to understand, the term “prime contractor” will mean the principal contractor; “subcontractor” will mean all subcontractors including lower-tier subcontractors; and the term “employer” will mean all contractors as a group, including the prime contractor and any subcontractors and lower-tier subcontractors.

HUD program labor standards forms are available on-line at:
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/index.cfm
All current Davis-Bacon wage decisions can be accessed on-line at no cost at:
http://www.wdol.gov
280
1-4
1-5 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR.

The contract administrator is responsible for the proper administration and enforcement of the Federal labor standards provisions on contracts covered by Davis-Bacon requirements. We use this term to represent the person (or persons) who will provide labor standards advice and support to you and other project principals (e.g., the owner, sponsor, architect), including providing the proper Davis-Bacon wage decision (see 2-1, The Wage Decision) and ensuring that the wage decision and contract clauses are incorporated into the contract for construction. The contract administrator also monitors labor standards compliance (see 2-6, Compliance Reviews) by conducting interviews with construction workers at the job site and reviewing payroll reports, and oversees any enforcement actions that may be required.

The contract administrator could be an employee or agent of HUD, or of a city or county or public housing agency. For HUD projects administered directly by HUD staff, usually FHAinsured multifamily projects, the contract administrator will be the HUD Labor Relations field staff. But many HUD-assisted projects are administered by local contracting agencies such as Public Housing Agencies (PHAs), Indian tribes and tribally-designated housing entities (TDHEs), and States, cities and counties under HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. In these cases, the contract administrator will likely be local agency staff. In either case, the guidance for you remains essentially the same.

The DOL also has a role in monitoring Davis-Bacon administration and enforcement. In addition, DOL has independent authority to conduct investigations. A DOL investigator or other DOL representative may visit Davis-Bacon construction sites to interview construction workers or review payroll information.
281
2-1
CHAPTER 2 HOW TO COMPLY WITH LABOR STANDARDS

AND PAYROLL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
WHERE TO START? Now that you know you’re on a Davis-Bacon project and you know some of the legal and practical implications, what’s next?

SECTION I - THE BASICS
2-1 THE WAGE DECISION.

Davis-Bacon labor standards stipulate the wage payment requirements for Carpenters, Electricians, Plumbers, Roofers, Laborers, and other construction work classifications that may be needed for the project. The Davis-Bacon wage decision that applies to the project contains a schedule of work classifications and wage rates that must be followed.

If you don’t have it already (and by now you should), you’ll want to get a copy of the applicable Davis-Bacon wage decision.
a. The work classifications and wage rates. A Davis-Bacon wage decision is simply a listing of different work classifications and the minimum wage rates that must be paid to anyone performing work in those classifications. You’ll want to make sure that the work classification(s) you need are contained in the wage decision and make certain you know exactly what wage rate(s) you will need to pay. Some wage decisions cover several counties and/or types of construction work (for example, residential and commercial work) and can be lengthy and difficult to read. Contact the contract administrator (HUD Labor Relations field staff or local agency staff) if you have any trouble reading the wage decision or finding the work classification(s) you need.

To make reading lengthy wage decisions easier for you, the contract administrator may prepare a Project Wage Rate Sheet (HUD-4720). This Sheet is a one-page transcript that will show only the classifications and wage rates for a particular project. A blank copy of a Project Wage Rate Sheet is provided for you in the appendix. Also, a fillable version of this form is available on-line at HUDClips (see web address in the Appendix). Contact the contract administrator monitoring your project for assistance with a Project Wage Rate Sheet.

Remember, the wage decision is contained in the contract specifications along with the labor standards clauses. See 1-3, Construction Contract Provisions. 282
2-2
b. Posting the wage decision. If you are the prime contractor, you will be responsible for posting a copy of the wage decision (or the Project Wage Rate Sheet) and a copy of the DOL Davis-Bacon poster titled Employee Rights under the Davis-Bacon Act (Form WH1321) at the job site in a place that is easily accessible to all of the construction workers employed at the project and where the wage decision and poster won’t be destroyed by wind or rain, etc. The Employee Rights under the Davis-Bacon Act poster is available in English and Spanish on-line at HUDClips (see address in the Appendix). 2-2 ADDITIONAL “TRADE” CLASSIFICATIONS AND WAGE RATES.

What if the work classification you need isn’t on the wage decision? If the work classification(s) that you need doesn’t appear on the wage decision, you will need to request an additional classification and wage rate. This process is usually very simple and you’ll want to start the request right away. Basically, you identify the classification you need and recommend a wage rate for DOL to approve for the project. There are a few rules about additional classifications; you’ll find these rules in the DOL regulations, Part 5, and in the labor clauses in your contract. The rules are summarized for you here:
a. Additional classification rules. Additional classifications and wage rates can be approved if:

1. The requested classification is used by construction contractors in the area of the project. (The area is usually defined as the county where the project is located).

2. The work that will be performed by the requested classification is not already performed by another classification that is already on the wage decision. (In other words, if there already is an Electrician classification and wage rate on the wage decision you can’t request another Electrician classification and rate.)

3. The proposed wage rate for the requested classification “fits” with the other wage rates already on the wage decision. (For example, the wage rate proposed for a trade classification such as Electrician must be at least as much as the lowest wage rate for other trade classifications already contained in the wage decision.) And,

4. The workers that will be employed in the added classification (if it is known who the workers are/will be), or the workers’ representatives, must agree with the proposed wage rate.

The Employee Rights under the Davis-Bacon Act poster (WH-1321) replaces the Notice to all Employees. The new poster is available in English and Spanish on-line at HUDClips (see address in the Appendix).
283
2-3
b. Making the request. A request for additional classification and wage rate must be made in writing through the contract administrator. (If the contract administrator is a local agency, the agency will send the request to the HUD Labor Relations staff.) If you are a subcontractor, your request should also go through the prime contractor. All you need to do is identify the work classification that is missing and recommend a wage rate (usually the rate that employer is already paying to the employees performing the work) for that classification. You may also need to describe the work that the new classification will perform.
c. HUD review. The HUD Labor Relations field staff will review the requested classification and wage rate to determine whether the request meets the DOL rules outlined in paragraph 2-2(a), above. If additional information or clarification is needed, the staff will contact the prime contractor (or contract administrator for local agency projects) for more information, etc. If the Labor Relations review finds that the request meets the rules, the staff will give preliminary approval on the request and refer it to the DOL for final approval. The staff will send to you a copy of the preliminary approval/referral letter to the DOL.

If the HUD Labor Relations staff doesn’t think the request meets the rules and if agreement can’t be reached on the proper classification or wage rate for the work described, the HUD Labor Relations staff will not approve the request. In this case, the staff will send your request to the DOL with an explanation why HUD believes that the request shouldn’t be approved. The DOL still has final decision authority. You will receive a copy of the disapproval/referral letter to the DOL.
d. DOL decision. The DOL will respond to HUD Labor Relations in writing about the additional classification and wage rate request. HUD Labor Relations will notify you of the DOL decision in writing. If the DOL approves the request, the prime contractor must post the approval notice on the job site with the wage decision.

If the DOL does not approve the request, you will be notified about what classification and wage rate should be used for the work in question. You will also receive instructions about how to ask for DOL reconsideration if you still want to try to get your recommendation approved.

It’s always a good idea to talk to the contract administrator before submitting an additional classification and wage rate request. The contract administrator can offer suggestions and advice that may save you time and increase the likelihood that DOL will approve your request. Usually, the contract administrator can give you an idea about what the DOL will finally decide.
284
2-4
2-3 CERTIFIED PAYROLL REPORTS.

You’ll need to submit a weekly certified payroll report (CPR) beginning with the first week that your company works on the project and for every week afterward until your firm has completed its work. It’s always a good idea to number the payroll reports beginning with #1 and to clearly mark your last payroll for the project “Final.” a. Payroll formats. The easiest form to use is DOL’s WH-347, Payroll. A sample copy of the WH-347 is included in the back of this Guide. You may access a fillable version of the WH-347 on-line at HUDClips (see web address in the Appendix). Also, the contract administrator can provide a few copies of the WH-347 that you can reproduce. b. Payroll certifications. The weekly payrolls are called certified because each payroll is signed and contains language certifying that the information is true and correct. The payroll certification language is on the reverse side of the WH-347. If you are using another type of payroll format you may attach the certification from the back of the WH347, or any other format which contains the same certification language on the WH-347 (reverse).
c. “No work” payrolls. “No work” payrolls may be submitted whenever there is a temporary break in your work on the project, for example, if your firm is not needed on the project right now but you will be returning to the job in a couple of weeks. (See tip box, for “no work” payroll exemption!) However, if you know that your firm will not be working on the project for an extended period of time, you may wish to send a short note to the contract administrator to let them know about the break in work and to give an approximate date when your firm will return to the project. If you number payrolls consecutively or if you send a note, you do not need to send “no work” payrolls.

You are not required to use Payroll form WH-347. You are welcome to use any other type of payroll, such as computerized formats, as long as it contains all of the information that is required on the WH-347.

DOL’s website has Payroll Instructions and the Payroll form WH-347 in a “fillable” PDF format at this address:
www.dol.gov/whd/forms/wh347.pdf
If you number your payroll reports consecutively, you do not need to submit “no work” payrolls!
285
2-5
d. Payroll review and submission. The prime contractor should review each subcontractor’s payroll reports for compliance prior to submitting the reports to the contract administrator.

Remember, the prime contractor is responsible for the full compliance of all subcontractors on the contract and will be held accountable for any wage restitution that may be found due to any laborer or mechanic that is underpaid and for any liquidated damages that may be assessed for overtime violations. All of the payroll reports for any project must be submitted to the contract administrator through the prime contractor. e. Payroll retention. Every contractor (including every subcontractor) must keep a complete set of their own payrolls and other basic records such as employee addresses and full SSNs, time cards, tax records, evidence of fringe benefit payments, for a Davis-Bacon project for at least 3 years after the project is completed. The prime contractor must keep a complete set of all of the payrolls for every contractor (including subcontractors) for at least 3 years after completion of the project.
f. Payroll inspection. In addition to submitting payrolls to the contract administrator, every contractor (including subcontractors) must make their own copy of the payrolls and other basic records available for review or copying to any authorized representative from HUD or from DOL.
2-4 DAVIS-BACON DEFINITIONS.

Before we discuss how to complete the weekly payroll forms, we need to review a couple of definitions. These definitions can help you understand what will be required of you:
a. Laborer or mechanic. “Laborers” and “mechanics” mean anyone who is performing construction work on the project, including trade journeymen (carpenters, plumbers, sheet metal workers, etc.), apprentices, and trainees and, for CWHSSA purposes, watchmen and guards. “Laborers” and “mechanics” are the two groups of workers that must be paid not less than Davis-Bacon wage rates.

1. Working foremen. Foremen or supervisors that regularly spend more than 20% of their time performing construction work and do not meet the exclusions in paragraph 2 below are covered “laborers” and “mechanics” for labor standards purposes for the time spent performing construction work.

2. Exclusions. People whose duties are primarily administrative, executive or clerical are not laborers or mechanics. Examples include superintendents, office staff, timekeepers, messengers, etc. (Contact the contract administrator if you have any questions about whether a particular employee is excluded.) An alert prime contractor that reviews subcontractor payroll submissions can detect any misunderstandings early, prevent costly underpayments and protect itself from financial loss should underpayments occur.
286
2-6
b. Employee. Every person who performs the work of a laborer or mechanic is “employed” regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between a contractor or subcontractor and such person. This means that even if there is a contract between a contractor and a worker, the contractor must make sure that the worker is paid at least as much as the wage rate on the wage decision for the classification of work they perform. Note that there are no exceptions to the prevailing wage requirements for relatives or for self-employed laborers and mechanics.
c. Apprentices and trainees. The only workers who can be paid less than the wage rate on the wage decision for their work classification are “apprentices” and “trainees” registered in approved apprenticeship or training programs. Approved programs are those which have been registered with the DOL or a DOL-recognized State Apprenticeship Council (SAC).

Apprentices and trainees are paid wage rates in accordance with the wage schedule in the approved program.

1. Probationary apprentice. A “probationary apprentice” can be paid as an apprentice (less than the rate on the wage decision) if the DOL or SAC has certified that the person is eligible for probationary employment as an apprentice.

2. Pre-apprentice. A “pre-apprentice”, that is, someone who is not registered in a program and who hasn’t been DOL- or SAC-certified for probationary apprenticeship is not considered to be an “apprentice” and must be paid the full journeyman’s rate on the wage decision for the classification of work they perform.

3. Ratio of apprentices and trainees to journeymen. The maximum number of apprentices or trainees that you can use on the job site cannot exceed the ratio of apprentices or trainees to journeymen allowed in the approved program.

Most often, the apprentice/trainee wage rate is expressed as a series of percentages tied to the amount of time spent in the program. For example, 0-6 months: 65%; 6 months - 1 year: 70%; etc. The percentage is applied to the journeyman’s wage rate. On DavisBacon projects, the percentage must be applied to the journeyman’s wage rate on the applicable wage decision for that craft.

For more information about working subcontractors, ask the contract administrator or your HUD Labor Relations Field Staff for a copy of Labor Relations Letter LR-96-01, Labor standards compliance requirements for self-employed laborers and mechanics.

Labor Relations Letters and other helpful Labor Relations publications are available at HUD’s Labor Relations web site (see the list of web site addresses in the Appendix). 287
2-7
d. Prevailing wages or wage rates. Prevailing wage rates are the wage rates listed on the wage decision for the project. The wage decision will list a minimum basic hourly rate of pay for each work classification. Some wage decisions include fringe benefits which are usually listed as an hourly fringe rate. If the wage decision includes a fringe benefit rate for a classification, you will need to add the fringe benefit rate to the basic hourly rate unless you provide bona fide fringe benefits for your employees.

1. Piece-work. Some employees are hired on a piece-work basis, that is, the employee’s earnings are determined by a factor of work produced. For example, a Drywall Hanger’s earnings may be calculated based upon the square feet of sheetrock actually hung, a Painter’s earnings may be based upon the number of units painted. Employers may calculate weekly earnings based upon piece rates provided the weekly earnings are sufficient to satisfy the wage rate requirement based upon actual hours, including any overtime, worked.

Accurate time records must be maintained for any piece-work employees.

If the weekly piece rate earnings are not sufficient, the employer must recompute weekly earnings based upon the actual hours worked and the rate on the wage decision for the work classification(s) involved. e. Fringe benefits Fringe benefits can include health insurance premiums, retirement contributions, life insurance, vacation and other paid leave as well as some contributions to training funds. Fringe benefits do not include employer payments or contributions required by other Federal, State or local laws, such as the employer’s contribution to Social Security or some disability insurance payments.
f. Overtime. Overtime hours are defined as all hours worked on the contract in excess of 40 hours in any work week. Overtime hours must be paid at no less than one and onehalf times the regular rate of basic pay plus the straight-time rate of any required fringe benefits.

Note that the total hourly wage rate paid to any laborer or mechanic (basic wage or basic wage plus fringe benefits) may be no less than the total wage rate (basic wage or basic wage plus fringe benefits) on the wage decision for their craft. If the value of the fringe benefit(s) you provide is less than the fringe benefit rate on the wage decision, you will need to add the balance of the wage decision fringe benefit rate to the basic rate paid to the employee. For example, if the wage decision requires $10/hour basic rate plus $5/ hour fringe benefits, you must pay no less than that total ($15/hour) in the basic rate or basic rate plus whatever fringe benefit you may provide. You can meet this obligation in several ways: you could pay the base wage and fringe benefits as stated in the wage decision, or you could pay $15 in base wage with no fringe benefits, or you could pay $12 basic plus $3 fringe benefits. You can also off-set the amount of the base wage if you pay more in fringe benefits such as by paying or $9 basic plus $6 fringe benefits; as long as you meet the total amount. The amount of the base wage that you may off-set with fringe benefits is limited by certain IRS and FLSA requirements. 288
2-8
g. Deductions. You may make payroll deductions as permitted by DOL Regulations 29 CFR Part 3. These regulations prohibit the employer from requiring employees to “kick-back” (i.e., give up) any of their earnings. Allowable deductions which do not require prior DOL permission include employee obligations for income taxes, Social Security payments, insurance premiums, retirement, savings accounts, and any other legally-permissible deduction authorized by the employee. Deductions may also be made for payments on judgments and other financial obligations legally imposed against the employee. h. Proper designation of trade. You must select a work classification on the wage decision for each worker based on the actual type of work he/she performed and you must pay each worker no less than the wage rate on the wage decision for that classification regardless of their level of skill. In other words, if someone is performing carpentry work on the project, they must be paid no less than the wage rate on the wage decision for Carpenters even if they aren’t considered by you to be fully trained as a Carpenter. Remember, the only people who can be paid less than the rate for their craft are apprentices and trainees registered in approved programs.

1. Split-classification. If you have employees that perform work in more than one trade during a work week, you can pay the wage rates specified for each classification in which work was performed only if you maintain accurate time records showing the amount of time spent in each classification of work. If you do not maintain accurate time records, you must pay these employees the highest wage rate of all of the classifications of work performed. i. Site of work. The “site of work” is where the Davis-Bacon wage rates apply. Usually, this means the boundaries of the project. “Site of work” can also include other adjacent or virtually adjacent property used by a contractor or subcontractor in the construction of the project, like a fabrication site that is dedicated exclusively, or nearly so, to the project.

Referring, again, to our example above where the wage decision requiring a $15 total wage obligation ($10 basic wage plus $5 fringe benefits) was met by paying $9 base wage plus $6 fringe benefits: Note that overtime rates must be based on one and one-half times the basic rate as stated on the wage decision. In the above example, the employer must pay for overtime: $15/hr ($9 basic + $6 fringe) plus $5 (one-half of $10, the wage decision basic rate) for a total of $20 per hour.
289
2-9

SECTION II - REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
2-5 COMPLETING A PAYROLL REPORT.

What information has to be reported on the payroll form? The weekly payroll form doesn’t ask for any information that you don’t already need to keep for wage payment and tax purposes. For example, you need to know each employee’s name; his or her work classification (who is working for you and what do they do?), the hours worked during the week, his or her rate of pay, the gross amount earned (how much did they earn?), the amounts of any deductions for taxes, etc., and the net amount paid (how much should the paycheck be made out for?). No more information than you need to know in order to manage your work crew and make certain they are paid properly. And, certainly, no more information than you need to keep for IRS, Social Security and other tax and employment purposes.

You are required to submit certified payrolls to illustrate and document that you have complied with the prevailing wage requirements. The purpose of the contract administrator’s review of your payrolls is to verify your compliance. Clearer and complete payroll reports will permit the contract administrator to complete reviews of your payroll reports quickly. a. Project and contractor/subcontractor information. Each payroll must identify the contractor or subcontractor’s name and address, the project name and number, and the week ending date. Indicate the week dates in the spaces provided. Numbering payrolls is optional but strongly recommended.
b. Employee information. Effective January 18, 2009, payrolls shall not report employee addresses or full Social Security Numbers (SSNs). Instead, the first payroll on which each employee appears shall include the employee’s name and an individually identifying number, usually the last 4 digits of the employee’s SSN. Afterward, the identifying number does not need to be reported unless it is necessary to distinguish between employees, e.g., if two employees have the same name.

Employers (prime contractors and subcontractors) must maintain the current address and full SSN for each employee and must provide this information upon request to the contracting agency or other authorized representative responsible for federal labor standards compliance monitoring. Prime contractors may require a subcontractor(s) to provide this information for the prime contractor’s records. DOL has modified form WH347, Payroll, to accommodate these reporting requirements. c. Work classification. Each employee must be classified in accordance with the wage decision based on the type of work they actually perform.

For many contractors, the Weekly Certified Payroll is the only Davis-Bacon paperwork you need to submit!
290
2-10

1. Apprentices or trainees. The first payroll on which any apprentice or trainee appears must be accompanied by a copy of that apprentice’s or trainee’s registration in a registered or approved program. A copy of the portions of the registered or approved program pertaining to the wage rates and ratios shall also accompany the first payroll on which the first apprentice or trainee appears.

2. Split classifications. For an employee that worked in a split classification, make a separate entry for each classification of work performed distributing the hours of work to each classification, accordingly, and reflecting the rate of pay and gross earnings for each classification. Deductions and net pay may be based upon the total gross amount earned for all classifications.
d. Hours worked. The payroll should show ONLY the regular and overtime hours worked on this project. Show both the daily and total weekly hours for each employee. If an employee performs work at job sites other than the project for which the payroll is prepared, those “other job” hours should not be reported on the payroll. In these cases, you should list the employee’s name, classification, hours for this project only, the rate of pay and gross earnings for this project, and the gross earned for all projects. Deductions and net pay may be based upon the employee’s total earnings (for all projects) for the week. e. Rate of pay. Show the basic hourly rate of pay for each employee for this project. If the wage decision includes a fringe benefit and you do not participate in approved fringe benefit programs, add the fringe benefit rate to the basic hourly rate of pay. Also list the overtime rate if overtime hours were worked.

1. Piece-work. For any piece-work employees, the employer must compute an effective hourly rate for each employee each week based upon the employee’s piece-work earnings for that week. To compute the effective hourly rate, divide the piece-work earnings by the total number of hours worked, including consideration for any overtime hours.

The effective hourly rate must be reflected on the certified payroll and this hourly rate may be no less than the wage rate (including fringe benefits, if any) on the wage decision for the classification of work performed. It does not matter that the effective hourly rate changes from week-to-week, only that the rate is no less than the rate on the wage decision for the classification of work performed. f. Gross wages earned. Show the gross amount of wages earned for work performed on this project. Note: For employees with work hours and earnings on other projects, you may show gross wages for this project over gross earnings all projects (for example, $425.40/$764.85) and base deductions and net pay on the “all projects” earnings.

Remember, the overtime rate is computed at one and one-half times the basic rate of pay plus any fringe benefits. For example, if the wage decision requires $10/hour basic plus $5/hour fringe benefits, the overtime rate would be: ($10 x 1 ½) + $5 = $20/hour. 291
2-11
g. Deductions. Show the amounts of any deductions from the gross earnings. “Other” deductions should be identified (for example, Savings Account or Loan Repayment). Any voluntary deduction (that is, not required by law or by an order of a proper authority) must be authorized in writing by the employee or provided for in a collective bargaining (union) agreement. A short note signed by the employee is all that is needed and should accompany the first payroll on which the other deduction appears. h. Net pay. Show the net amount of wages paid.
i. Statement of compliance. The Statement of Compliance is the certification. It is located on the reverse side of a standard payroll form (WH-347). Be sure to complete the identifying information at the top, particularly if you are attaching the Statement of Compliance to an alternate payroll form such as a computer payroll. Also, you must check either 4(a) or 4(b) if the wage decision contains a fringe benefit. Checking 4(a) indicates that you are paying required fringe benefits to approved plans or programs; and 4(b) indicates that you are paying any required fringe benefit amounts directly to the employee by adding the fringe benefit rate to the basic hourly rate of pay. If you are paying a portion of the required fringe benefit to programs and the balance directly to the employee, explain those differences in box 4(c).
j. Signature. Make sure the payroll is signed with an original signature in ink. The payroll must be signed by a principal of the firm (owner or officer such as the president, treasurer or payroll administrator) or by an authorized agent (a person authorized by a principal in writing to sign the payroll reports). Signature authorization (for persons other than a principal) should be submitted with the first payroll signed by such an agent. Signatures in pencil; signature stamps; xerox, pdf and other facsimiles are not acceptable.

Only one employee authorization is needed for recurring (e.g., weekly) other deductions.

Written employee authorization is not required for income tax and Social Security deductions.

Only one Statement of Compliance is required for each employer’s weekly payroll no matter how many pages are needed to report the employee data. 292
2-12

SECTION III - PAYROLL REVIEWS AND CORRECTIONS
2-6 COMPLIANCE REVIEWS.

The contract administrator or other inspector may visit the project site and interview some of the workers concerning their employment on the project. The DOL may also independently conduct its own reviews (see 1-5). In addition, the contract administrator will periodically review payrolls and related submissions, comparing the interview information to the payrolls, to ensure that the labor standards requirements have been met. You will be notified by the contract administrator if these reviews find any discrepancies or errors.

You will be given instructions about what steps must be taken to correct any problems. a. On-site interviews. Every employer (contractor, subcontractor, etc.) must make their employees available for interview at the job site with the contract administrator or other agency representative, or HUD or DOL representative. The interviews are confidential and the employee will be asked about the kind of work they perform and their rate of pay. Every effort will be made to ensure that these interviews cause as little disruption as possible to the on-going work. The interviewer will record the interview information, usually on a form HUD-11, Record of Employee Interview, and forward the interviews to the contract administrator.
b. Project payroll reviews. The contract administrator will compare the information on the interview forms to the corresponding payrolls to ensure that the workers are properly listed on the payrolls for the days and hours worked on the job site, work classification and rate of pay. The contract administrator will also review the payroll submissions to make certain that the payrolls are complete and signed; that employees are paid no less than the wage rate for the work classification shown; apprentice and trainee certifications are submitted (where needed); employee or other authorizations for other deductions are submitted (where needed); etc.
2-7 TYPICAL PAYROLL ERRORS AND REQUIRED CORRECTIONS.

The following paragraphs describe common payroll errors and the corrective steps you must take.
a. Inadequate payroll information. If an alternate payroll format used by an employer (such as some computer payrolls) is inadequate, e.g., does not contain all of the necessary information that would be on the optional form WH-347, the employer will be asked to resubmit the payrolls on an acceptable form.
b. Missing identification numbers. If the first payroll on which an employee appears does not contain the employee’s individually identifying number, the employer will be asked to supply the missing information. This information can be reported on the next payroll submitted by the employer if the employer is still working on the project. Otherwise, the employer will be asked to submit a correction certified payroll. 293
2-13
c. Incomplete payrolls. If the information on the payroll is not complete, for example, if work classifications or rates of pay are missing, the employer will be asked to send a correction certified payroll.
d. Classifications. If the payrolls show work classifications that do not appear on the wage decision, the employer will be asked to reclassify the employees in accordance with the wage decision or the employer may request an additional classification and wage rate (see 2-2). If reclassification results in underpayment (i.e., the wage rate reported on the payroll is less than the rate required for the new classification), the employer will be asked to pay wage restitution to all affected reclassified employees. (see 2-8 for instructions about wage restitution.)
e. Wage rates. If the wage rates on the payroll are less than the wage rates on the wage decision for the work classifications reported, the employer will be asked to pay wage restitution to all affected employees.
f. Apprentices and trainees. If a copy of the employee’s registration or the approved program ratio and wage schedule are not submitted with the first payroll on which an apprentice or trainee appears, the employer will be asked to submit a copy of each apprentice’s or trainee’s registration and/or the approved program ratio and wage schedule. If the ratio of apprentices or trainees to journeymen on the payroll is greater than the ratio in the approved program, the employer will be asked to pay wage restitution to any excess apprentices or trainees. Also, any apprentice or trainee that is not registered in an approved program must receive the journeyman’s wage rate for the classification of work they performed.
g. Overtime. If the employees did not receive at least time and one-half for any overtime hours worked on the project, the following will occur:

1. If the project is subject to CWHSSA overtime requirements, the employer will be asked to pay wage restitution for all overtime hours worked on the project. The employer may also be liable to the United States for liquidated damages computed at $10 per day per violation. Or,

2. If the project is not subject to CWHSSA, the employer will be notified of the possible FLSA overtime violations. Also, the contract administrator may refer the matter to the DOL for further review.
h. Computations. If the payroll computations (hours worked times rate of pay) or extensions (deductions, net pay) show frequent errors, the employer will be asked to take greater care. Wage restitution may be required if underpayments resulted from the errors. i. Deductions. If there are any “Other” deductions that are not identified, or if employee authorization isn’t provided, or if there is any unusual (very high, or large number) deduction activity, the employer will be asked to identify the deductions, provide employee authorization or explain unusual deductions, as necessary. 294
2-14
j. Fringe benefits. If the wage decision contains fringe benefits but the payroll does not indicate how fringe benefits were paid [neither 4(a) nor 4(b) is marked on the Statement of Compliance], the employer may be asked to submit correction certified payrolls and will be required to pay wage restitution if underpayments occurred. However, if the basic hourly rates for the employees are at least as much as the total wage rate on the wage decision (basic hourly rate plus the fringe benefit rate), no correction is necessary. k. Signature. If the payroll Statement of Compliance is not signed or is missing, the employer will be asked to submit a signed Statement of Compliance for each payroll affected. If the Statement of Compliance is signed by a person who is not a principle of the firm and that person has not been authorized by principle to sign, the employer will be asked to provide an authorization or to resubmit the Statement(s) of Compliance bearing the signature of a principle or other authorized signatory.
l. On-site interview comparisons. If the comparison of on-site interviews to the payrolls indicates any discrepancies (for example, the employee does not appear on the payroll for the date of the interview), the employer will be asked to submit a correction certified payroll report.
m. Correction certified payroll. Any and all changes to data on a submitted payroll report must be reported on a certified correction payroll. In no case will a payroll report be returned to the prime contractor or employer for revision. 2-8 RESTITUTION FOR UNDERPAYMENT OF WAGES.

Where underpayments of wages have occurred, the employer will be required to pay wage restitution to the affected employees. Wage restitution must be paid promptly in the full amounts due, less permissible and authorized deductions. All wages paid to laborers and mechanics for work performed on the project, including wage restitution, must be reported on a certified payroll report.
a. Notification to the Employer/Prime contractor. The contract administrator will notify the employer and/or prime contractor in writing of any underpayments that are found during payroll or other reviews. The contract administrator will describe the underpayments and provide instructions for computing and documenting the restitution to be paid. The employer/ prime contractor is allowed 30 days to correct the underpayments. Note that the prime contractor is responsible to the contract administrator for ensuring that restitution is paid. If the employer is a subcontractor, the subcontractor will usually make the computations and restitution payments and furnish the required documentation through the prime contractor.

HUD does not enforce or attempt to provide advice on employer obligations to make deductions from employee earnings for taxes or Social Security. However, HUD may refer to the IRS or other responsible agency copies of certified payroll reports that show wages paid in gross amounts (i.e., without tax deduction) for its review and appropriate action.
295
2-15
b. Computing wage restitution. Wage restitution is simply the difference between the wage rate paid to each affected employee and the wage rate required on the wage decision for all hours worked where underpayments occurred. The difference in the wage rates is called the adjustment rate. The adjustment rate times the number of hours involved equals the gross amount of restitution due. You may also compute wage restitution by calculating the total amount of Davis-Bacon wages earned and subtracting the total amount of wages paid. The difference is the amount of back wages due. c. Correction certified payrolls. The employer will be required to report the restitution paid on a correction certified payroll. The correction payroll will reflect the period of time for which restitution is due (for example, Payrolls #1 through #6; or a beginning date and ending date). The correction payroll will list each employee to whom restitution is due and their work classification; the total number of work hours involved (daily hours are usually not applicable for wage restitution); the adjustment wage rate (the difference between the required wage rate and the wage rate paid); the gross amount of restitution due; deductions and the net amount actually paid. A properly signed Statement of Compliance must accompany the correction payroll.
d. Review of correction CPR. The contract administrator will review the correction certified payroll to ensure that full restitution was paid. The prime contractor shall be notified in writing of any discrepancies and will be required to make additional payments, if needed, documented on a correction certified payroll within 30 days. e. Unfound workers. Sometimes, wage restitution cannot be paid to an affected employee because, for example, the employee has moved and can’t be located. After wage restitution has been paid to all of the workers who could be located, the employer must submit a list of any workers who could not be found and paid (i.e., unfound workers) providing their names, Social Security Numbers, last known addresses and the gross amount due. In such cases, at the end of the project the prime contractor will be required HUD no longer requires the signature of the employee on the correction payroll to evidence employee receipt of restitution payment. In addition, except in the most extraordinary cases, HUD no longer requires employers to submit copies of restitution checks (certified, cashiers, canceled or other), or employee-signed receipts or waivers.

The contract administrator may communicate directly with a subcontractor when the underpayments are plainly evident and the subcontractor is cooperative. It is best to work through the prime contractor when the issues are complex, when there are significant underpayments and/or the subcontractor is not cooperative. In all cases, the subcontractor must ensure that the prime contractor receives a copy of the required corrective documentation.
296
2-16
to place in a deposit or escrow account an amount equal to the total gross amount of restitution that could not be paid because the employee(s) could not be located. The contract administrator will continue attempts to locate the unfound workers for 3 years after the completion of the project. After 3 years, any amount remaining in the account for unfound workers will be credited and/or forwarded by the contract administrator to HUD. 297
3-1
CHAPTER 3 LABOR STANDARDS DISPUTES, ADMINISTRATIVE

REVIEWS, WITHHOLDING, DEPOSITS AND ESCROW

ACCOUNTS, AND SANCTIONS
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THINGS GO WRONG?
3-1 INTRODUCTION.

Even in the best of circumstances, things can go wrong. In a Davis-Bacon context, “things going wrong” usually means there’s a difference of opinion or a dispute about whether and to what extent underpayments have occurred. These disputes are usually between the contract administrator and one or more employers (the prime contractor and/ or a subcontractor). The dispute may involve something simple such as an additional classification request that is pending before the DOL; or something as significant as investigative findings following a complaint of underpayment. This chapter discusses some of what you may expect and what you can do to make your views known and to lessen any delays in resolving the problem or issue.
3-2 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW ON LABOR STANDARDS DISPUTES.

As mentioned in the Introduction above, a dispute about labor standards and compliance can arise for a number of reasons. The labor standards clauses in your contract and DOL regulations provide for administrative review of issues where there is a difference of views between the contract administrator and any employer. The most common circumstances include:
a. Additional classifications and wage rates. Additional classification and wage rate requests are sometimes denied by the DOL. An employer that is dissatisfied with the denial can request reconsideration by the DOL Wage and Hour Administrator. The employer may continue to pay the wage rate, as requested, until a final decision is rendered on the matter. When the final decision is known, the employer will be required to pay any additional wages that may be necessary to satisfy the wage rate that is established.

1. Reconsideration. The DOL normally identifies the reasons for denial in its response to the request. Any interested person (for example, the contract administrator, employer, representatives of the employees) may request reconsideration of the decision on the additional classification request. The request for reconsideration must be made in writing and must thoroughly address the denial reasons identified by the DOL. Employer requests for reconsideration should be made through the contract administrator but may be made directly to the DOL. (See 2-2(d), and also DOL Regulations 29 CFR

1.8.) All requests initiated by or made through the contract administrator or HUD must be submitted through the HUD Headquarters Office of Labor Relations. 298
3-2

2. Administrative Review Board. Any interested party may request a review of the Administrator’s decision on reconsideration by the DOL’s Administrative Review Board. DOL regulations 29 CFR Part 7 explain the procedures for such reviews. (See also 29 CFR 1.9.)
b. Findings of underpayment. Compliance reviews and other follow-up enforcement actions may result in findings of underpayment. The primary goal in every case and at every step in this process is to reach agreements about who may have been underpaid and how much wage restitution may be due and, of course, to promptly deliver restitution to any underpaid workers. The contract administrator will usually work informally with you to reach such agreements. You will have an opportunity to provide additional information to the contract administrator that may explain apparent inconsistencies and/or resolve the discrepancies.

If informal exchanges do not result in agreement, the final determination and schedule of back wages due will be presented to you in writing and you will be permitted 30 days in which to correct the underpayment(s) or to request a hearing on the matter before the DOL. The request for hearing must be made in writing through the contract administrator and must explain what findings are in dispute and the reasons. In such cases, HUD is required to submit a report to DOL for review and further consideration. All requests for DOL hearing must be submitted through the HUD Headquarters Office of Labor Relations.

1. DOL review. The DOL will review the contract administrator’s report and the arguments against the findings presented in the hearing request. The DOL may affirm or modify the findings based upon the materials presented. You will be notified in writing by the DOL of the results of its review. If DOL concludes that violations have occurred, you will be given an opportunity to correct any underpayments or to request a hearing before a DOL Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). (See DOL Regulations 29 CFR 5.11 (b) and 29 CFR Part 6, Rules of Practice for Administrative Proceedings.)

2. Administrative Review Board. Contractors and/or subcontractors may request a review by the Administrative Review Board of the decision(s) rendered by the DOL ALJ in the administrative hearing process. See DOL regulations 29 CFR Part 7 for more information about this proceeding.
3-3 WITHHOLDING.

The contract administrator shall cause withholding from payments due to the prime contractor to ensure the payment of wages which are believed to be due and unpaid, for example, if wage underpayments or other violations are not corrected within 30 days after written notification to the prime contractor. DOL may also direct the withholding of contract payments for alleged wage underpayments. Withholding is considered to be serious and is not taken unless warranted. If withholding is deemed necessary, you will be notified in writing. Only the amounts needed to meet the contractor’s (and/or subcontractors’) liability shall be withheld.
299
3-3
3-4 DEPOSITS AND ESCROWS.

In every case, we attempt to complete compliance actions and resolve any disputes before the project is completed and final payments are made. Sometimes, corrective actions or disputes continue after completion and provisions must be made to ensure that funds are available to pay any wage restitution that is ultimately found due. In these cases, we allow projects to proceed to final closing and final payments provided the prime contractor deposits an amount equal to the potential liability for wage restitution and liquidated damages, if necessary, in a special account. The deposit or escrow account is controlled by the contract administrator. When a final decision is rendered, the contract administrator makes disbursements from the account in accordance with the decision.

Deposit/escrow accounts are established for one or more of the following reasons:
a. Where the parties have agreed to amounts of wage restitution that are due but the employer hasn’t furnished evidence yet that all of the underpaid workers have received their back wages, e.g., some of the workers have moved and could not be located. The amount of the deposit is equal to the total gross amount of restitution due to workers lacking payment evidence. As these workers are paid and proper documentation is provided to the contract administrator, amounts corresponding to the documented payments are returned to the depositor. Amounts for any workers who cannot be located are held in the deposit/escrow account for three years and disposed as described in 2-8(f) of this Guide. b. Where underpayments are suspected or alleged and an investigation has not yet been completed. The deposit is equal to the amount of wage restitution and any liquidated damages, if applicable, that are estimated to be due. If the final determination of wages due is less than the amount estimated and placed in the escrow account, the escrow will be reduced to the final amount and the difference will be returned to the depositor.

If the parties agree to the investigative findings, the amounts due to the workers will be paid by the employer. As these workers are paid and proper documentation is provided to the contract administrator, the gross amounts corresponding to the documented payments are returned to the depositor.

1. If the employer is unable to make the payments to the workers, e.g., lacks the funds necessary, the contract administrator may make disbursements directly to the workers in the net amounts calculated by the employer. The amounts withheld from the workers for tax deduction will be returned to the employer as payments to workers are made. The employer shall be responsible for reporting and transmitting withholdings to the appropriate agencies.

Remember, the prime contractor is responsible and will be held liable for any wage restitution that is due to any worker employed in the construction of the project, including workers employed by subcontractors and any lower-tier subcontractors. See 1-4, Responsibility of the Principal Contractor, and 2-8, Restitution for Underpayment of Wages. 300
3-4

2. If the employer is not cooperating in the resolution, the contract administrator shall make disbursements to the workers in accordance with the schedule of wages due. Amounts for unfound workers will be retained as described above (See 2-8(f) and 3-4(a)).

If the parties do not agree and an administrative hearing is requested, the escrow will be maintained as explained in 3-4(c), below.
c. Where the parties are waiting for the outcome of an administrative hearing that has been or will be requested contesting a final determination of wages due. The deposit shall be equal to the amount of wage restitution and liquidated damages, if applicable, that have been determined due. Once a final decision is rendered, disbursements from the escrow account are made in accordance with the decision. 3-5 ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS.

Contractors and/or subcontractors that violate the labor standards provisions may face administrative sanctions imposed by HUD and/or DOL.
a. DOL debarment. Contractors and/or subcontractors that are found by the Secretary of Labor to be in aggravated or willful violation of the labor standards provisions of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) will be ineligible (debarred) to participate in any DBRA or Davis-Bacon Act contracts for up to 3 years. Debarment includes the contractor or subcontractor and any firm, corporation, partnership or association in which the contractor or subcontractor has a substantial interest. Debarment proceedings can be recommended by the contract administrator or can be initiated by the DOL. Debarment proceedings are described in DOL regulations 29 CFR 5.12. b. HUD sanctions. HUD sanctions may include Limited Denials of Participation (LDPs), debarments and suspensions.

1. Limited Denial of Participation. HUD may issue to the employer a limited denial of participation (LDP) which prohibits the employer from further participation in HUD programs for a period up to one year. The LDP is usually effective for the HUD program in which the violation occurred and for the geographic jurisdiction of the issuing HUD Office. HUD regulations concerning LDP’s are found at 24 CFR

24.700-24.714.

Remember, if you have any questions or need assistance concerning labor standards requirements help is always available. Contact the contract administrator for the project you’re working on or the HUD Field Labor Relations staff in your area. 301
3-5

2. Debarment and suspensions. In certain circumstances, HUD may initiate its own debarment or suspension proceedings against a contractor and/or subcontractor in connection with improper actions regarding Davis-Bacon obligations. For example, HUD may initiate debarment where a contractor has been convicted for making false statements (such as false statements on certified payrolls or other prevailing wage certifications) or may initiate suspension where a contractor has been indicted for making false statements. HUD regulations concerning debarment and suspension are found at 24 CFR Part 24.
3-6 FALSIFICATION OF CERTIFIED PAYROLL REPORTS.

Contractors and/or subcontractors that are found to have willfully falsified payroll reports (Statements of Compliance), including correction certified payroll reports, may be subject to civil or criminal prosecution. Penalties may be imposed of $1,000 and/or one year in prison for each false statement (see Section 1001 of Title 18 and Section 231 of Title 31 of the United States Code).

Remember, if you have any questions or need assistance concerning labor standards requirements help is always available. Contact the contract administrator for the project you’re working on or the HUD Field Labor Relations staff in your area. 302
A-1

ACRONYMS AND SYMBOLS
CDBG - Community Development Block Grant
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
CPR - Certified Payroll Report
CWHSSA - Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
DBA - Davis-Bacon Act
DBRA - Davis-Bacon and Related Acts
DOL - Department of Labor
FHA - Federal Housing Administration
FLSA - Fair Labor Standards Act
HUD - Housing and Urban Development (Department of)
IHA - Indian Housing Authority
LCA - Local Contracting Agency
LDP - Limited Denial of Participation
O/T - Overtime
PHA - Public Housing Agency
S/T - Straight-time
SAC - State Apprenticeship Council/Agency
TDHE - Tribally-Designated Housing Entity
§ - Section
¶ - Paragraph
303
A-2
DAVIS-BACON - RELATED WEB SITES*
HUD Office of Labor Relations:
www.hud.gov/offices/olr
HUD Regulations:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR HUDClips (HUD Forms and Publications):
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/index.cfm
DOL Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Homepage:
http://www.dol.gov/whd/contracts/dbra.htm
DOL Regulations:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR Davis-Bacon Wage Decisions:
www.wdol.gov
DOL Forms:
www.dol.gov/whd/programs/dbra/forms.htm
*Web addresses active as of January 2012
304
A-3
Project Wage Rate Sheet
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Office of Labor Relations
Project Name: Wage Decision Number/Modification Number:

Project Number: Project County:

Work
Classification
Basic
Hourly
Rate (BHR)
Fringe
Benefits
Total
Hourly
Wage Rate
Laborers
Fringe
Benefits
$
Bricklayers $ Group # BHR Total Wage
Carpenters $ $
Cement Masons $ $
Drywall Hangers $ $
Electricians $ $
Iron Workers $ $
Painters $ Operators Fringe Benefits: $
Plumbers $ Group # BHR Total Wage
Roofers $ $
Sheet Metal Workers $ $
Soft Floor Workers $ $
Tapers $ $
Tile Setters $ Truck Drivers Fringe Benefits: $
Other Classifications Group # BHR Total Wage
$
$
$
Additional Classifications (HUD Form 4230-A)
Work
Classification
Basic
Hourly
Rate (BHR)
Fringe
Benefits
Total
Hourly
Wage Rate
Date of
HUD Submission
to DOL
Date of
DOL
Approval
$
$
$
305
A-4 306
A-5 307
308
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Departmental Operations and Coordination
Washington, DC 20410
Email: [email protected]
Labor Relations Desk Guide
LR01.DG
309
EXHIBIT “E” – CURRENT FEDERAL WAGE DECISION
CIP NO. 601 & 698

CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
310
"General Decision Number: CA20220022 04/29/2022
Superseded General Decision Number: CA20210022
State: California
Construction Types: Building, Heavy (Heavy and Dredging) and Highway
County: Los Angeles County in California.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; DREDGING PROJECTS (does not include hopper dredge work); HEAVY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include water well drilling); HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Note: Contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act are generally required to pay at least the applicable minimum wage rate required under Executive Order 14026 or Executive Order 13658.

Please note that these Executive Orders apply to covered contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60).
______________________________________________________________ |If the contract is entered |. Executive Order 14026 |
|into on or after January 30, | generally applies to the | |2022, or the contract is | contract. |
|renewed or extended (e.g., an |. The contractor must pay | |option is exercised) on or | all covered workers at |
|after January 30, 2022: | least $15.00 per hour (or |
| | the applicable wage rate |
| | listed on this wage |
| | determination, if it is |
| | higher) for all hours |
| | spent performing on the |
| | contract in 2022. |
|______________________________|_____________________________| |If the contract was awarded on|. Executive Order 13658 | |or between January 1, 2015 and| generally applies to the | |January 29, 2022, and the | contract. |
|contract is not renewed or |. The contractor must pay all| |extended on or after January | covered workers at least | |30, 2022: | $11.25 per hour (or the |
| | applicable wage rate listed|
| | on this wage determination,|
| | if it is higher) for all |
| | hours spent performing on |
| | that contract in 2022. |
|______________________________|_____________________________| The applicable Executive Order minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. If this contract is covered by one of the Executive Orders and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must still submit a
conformance request.

Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the Executive Orders is available at
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/government-contracts.
311
Modification Number Publication Date
0 01/07/2022
1 01/14/2022
2 01/21/2022
3 02/25/2022
4 03/04/2022
5 04/01/2022
6 04/29/2022
ASBE0005-002 09/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Asbestos Workers/Insulator
(Includes the application of
all insulating materials,
protective coverings,
coatings, and finishes to all
types of mechanical systems).....$ 47.25 24.45
Fire Stop Technician
(Application of Firestopping
Materials for wall openings
and penetrations in walls,
floors, ceilings and curtain
walls)...........................$ 32.09 19.66
---------------------------------------------------------------- ASBE0005-004 07/05/2021
Rates Fringes
Asbestos Removal
worker/hazardous material
handler (Includes
preparation, wetting,
stripping, removal,
scrapping, vacuuming, bagging
and disposing of all
insulation materials from
mechanical systems, whether
they contain asbestos or not)....$ 22.40 13.07
---------------------------------------------------------------- BOIL0092-003 01/01/2021
Rates Fringes
BOILERMAKER......................$ 46.03 38.81
---------------------------------------------------------------- * BRCA0004-007 05/01/2020
Rates Fringes
BRICKLAYER; MARBLE SETTER........$ 41.53 19.48
*The wage scale for prevailing wage projects performed in Blythe, China lake, Death Valley, Fort Irwin, Twenty-Nine Palms, Needles and 1-15 corridor (Barstow to the Nevada State Line) will be Three Dollars ($3.00) above the
standard San Bernardino/Riverside County hourly wage rate ---------------------------------------------------------------- BRCA0018-004 06/01/2021
Rates Fringes
MARBLE FINISHER..................$ 35.90 14.11
312
TILE FINISHER....................$ 30.47 12.52
TILE LAYER.......................$ 43.09 18.31
---------------------------------------------------------------- * BRCA0018-010 09/01/2021
Rates Fringes
TERRAZZO FINISHER................$ 35.43 14.10
TERRAZZO WORKER/SETTER...........$ 43.61 14.63
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0213-001 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes

CARPENTER
(1) Carpenter, Cabinet
Installer, Insulation
Installer, Hardwood Floor
Worker and acoustical
installer...................$ 51.60 16.28
(2) Millwright..............$ 52.10 16.48
(3) Piledrivermen/Derrick
Bargeman, Bridge or Dock
Carpenter, Heavy Framer,
Rock Bargeman or Scowman,
Rockslinger, Shingler
(Commercial)................$ 51.73 16.28
(4) Pneumatic Nailer,
Power Stapler...............$ 51.85 16.28
(5) Sawfiler...............$ 51.69 16.28
(6) Scaffold Builder.......$ 42.80 16.28
(7) Table Power Saw
Operator....................$ 51.70 16.28
FOOTNOTE: Work of forming in the construction of open cut sewers or storm drains, on operations in which horizontal lagging is used in conjunction with steel H-Beams driven or placed in pre- drilled holes, for that portion of a lagged trench against which concrete is poured, namely, as a
substitute for back forms (which work is performed by
piledrivers): $0.13 per hour additional.
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0213-002 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Diver
(1) Wet.....................$ 834.40 16.28
(2) Standby.................$ 445.84 16.28
(3) Tender..................$ 437.84 16.28
(4) Assistant Tender........$ 413.84 16.28
Amounts in ""Rates' column are per day
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0213-004 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Drywall
DRYWALL INSTALLER/LATHER....$ 51.60 16.28
STOCKER/SCRAPPER............$ 22.16 8.62
---------------------------------------------------------------- CARP0721-001 07/01/2021
313
Rates Fringes
Modular Furniture Installer......$ 21.85 7.15
---------------------------------------------------------------- ELEC0011-004 01/31/2022
Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN (INSIDE

ELECTRICAL WORK)
Journeyman Electrician......$ 55.05 3%+29.37

ELECTRICIAN (INTELLIGENT
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Street
Lighting, Traffic Signals,
CCTV,and Underground Systems)
Journeyman Transportation
Electrician.................$ 55.05 3%+29.37
Technician..................$ 41.29 3%+29.37
FOOT NOTE:

CABLE SPLICER & INSTRUMENT PERSON: Recieve 5% additional per hour above Journeyman Electrician basic hourly rate.

TUNNEL WORK: 10% additional per hour.

SCOPE OF WORK - TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
ELECTRICIAN:

Installation of street lights and traffic signals,including electrical circuitry, programmable controllers,
pedestal-mounted electrical meter enclosures and laying of pre-assembled multi-conductor cable in ducts, layout of electrical systems and communication installation,
including proper position of trench depths and radius at duct banks, location for man
holes, pull boxes, street lights and traffic signals.

Installation of underground ducts for electrical,telephone, cable television and communication systems.

Pulling,termination and
splicing of traffic signal and street lighting conductors and electrical systems including interconnect,detector loop, fiber optic cable and video/cable.

TECHNICIAN:

Distribution of material at job site, manual excavation and backfill, installation of system conduits and raceways for electrical, telephone, cable television and communication systems. Pulling, terminating and splicing of traffic signal and street lighting conductors and electrical systems
including interconnect, detector loop, fiber optic cable and video/data.
---------------------------------------------------------------- * ELEC0011-005 12/27/2021
COMMUNICATIONS & SYSTEMS WORK (excludes any work on Intelligent Transportation Systems or CCTV highway systems)
Rates Fringes
Communications System
Installer...................$ 43.87 3%+15.03
Technician..................$ 33.30 3%+27.82
SCOPE OF WORK The work covered shall include the
314
installation, testing, service and maintenance, of the
following systems that utilize the transmission and/or
transference of voice, sound, vision and digital for
commercial, education, security and entertainment purposes for TV monitoring and surveillance, background foreground music, intercom and telephone interconnect, inventory
control systems, microwave transmission, multi-media,
multiplex, nurse call system, radio page, school intercom and sound, burglar alarms and low voltage master clock
systems.

A. Communication systems that transmit or receive information and/or control systems that are intrinsic to the above
listed systems SCADA (Supervisory control/data acquisition PCM (Pulse code modulation) Inventory control systems
Digital data systems Broadband & baseband and carriers
Point of sale systems VSAT data systems Data communication systems RF and remote control systems Fiber optic data
systems
B. Sound and Voice Transmission/Transference Systems
Background-Foreground Music Intercom and Telephone
Interconnect Systems Sound and Musical Entertainment
Systems Nurse Call Systems Radio Page Systems School
Intercom and Sound Systems Burglar Alarm Systems
Low-Voltage Master Clock Systems Multi-Media/Multiplex
Systems Telephone Systems RF Systems and Antennas and Wave Guide
C. *Fire Alarm Systems-installation, wire pulling and
testing.

D. Television and Video Systems Television Monitoring and Surveillance Systems Video Security Systems Video
Entertainment Systems Video Educational Systems CATV and CCTV
E. Security Systems, Perimeter Security Systems, Vibration Sensor Systems
Sonar/Infrared Monitoring Equipment, Access Control Systems, Card Access Systems
*Fire Alarm Systems

1. Fire Alarms-In Raceways: Wire and cable pulling in
raceways performed at the current electrician wage rate and fringe benefits.

2. Fire Alarms-Open Wire Systems: installed by the Technician. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ELEC1245-001 01/01/2022
Rates Fringes

LINE CONSTRUCTION
(1) Lineman; Cable splicer..$ 60.19 22.07
(2) Equipment specialist
(operates crawler
tractors, commercial motor
vehicles, backhoes,
trenchers, cranes (50 tons
and below), overhead &
underground distribution
line equipment).............$ 48.08 20.86
(3) Groundman...............$ 36.76 20.46
(4) Powderman...............$ 51.87 18.79
315
HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, M.L. King Day, Memorial Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day and day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Day
---------------------------------------------------------------- ELEV0018-001 01/01/2022
Rates Fringes
ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 61.34 36.885+a+b
FOOTNOTE:
a. PAID VACATION: Employer contributes 8% of regular hourly rate as vacation pay credit for employees with more than 5 years of service, and 6% for 6 months to 5 years of service. b. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, Friday after Thanksgiving, and Christmas Day.
---------------------------------------------------------------- ENGI0012-003 07/01/2020
Rates Fringes
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(All Other Work)
GROUP 1....................$ 48.25 27.20
GROUP 2....................$ 49.03 27.20
GROUP 3....................$ 49.32 27.20
GROUP 4....................$ 50.81 27.20
GROUP 5....................$ 48.96 25.25
GROUP 6....................$ 51.03 27.20
GROUP 8....................$ 51.14 27.20
GROUP 9....................$ 49.29 25.25
GROUP 10....................$ 51.26 27.20
GROUP 11....................$ 49.41 25.25
GROUP 12....................$ 51.43 27.20
GROUP 13....................$ 51.53 27.20
GROUP 14....................$ 51.56 27.20
GROUP 15....................$ 51.64 27.20
GROUP 16....................$ 51.76 27.20
GROUP 17....................$ 51.93 27.20
GROUP 18....................$ 52.03 27.20
GROUP 19....................$ 52.14 27.20
GROUP 20....................$ 52.26 27.20
GROUP 21....................$ 52.43 27.20
GROUP 22....................$ 52.53 27.20
GROUP 23....................$ 52.64 27.20
GROUP 24....................$ 52.76 27.20
GROUP 25....................$ 52.93 27.20
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Cranes, Piledriving &
Hoisting)
GROUP 1....................$ 49.60 27.20
GROUP 2....................$ 50.38 27.20
GROUP 3....................$ 50.67 27.20
GROUP 4....................$ 50.81 27.20
GROUP 5....................$ 51.03 27.20
GROUP 6....................$ 51.14 27.20
GROUP 7....................$ 51.26 27.20
GROUP 8....................$ 51.43 27.20
GROUP 9....................$ 51.60 27.20
GROUP 10....................$ 52.60 27.20
GROUP 11....................$ 53.60 27.20
316
GROUP 12....................$ 54.60 27.20
GROUP 13....................$ 55.60 27.20
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(Tunnel Work)
GROUP 1....................$ 50.10 27.20
GROUP 2....................$ 50.88 27.20
GROUP 3....................$ 51.17 27.20
GROUP 4....................$ 51.31 27.20
GROUP 5....................$ 51.53 27.20
GROUP 6....................$ 51.64 27.20
GROUP 7....................$ 51.76 27.20
PREMIUM PAY:
$3.75 per hour shall be paid on all Power Equipment Operator work on the followng Military Bases: China Lake Naval
Reserve, Vandenberg AFB, Point Arguello, Seely Naval Base, Fort Irwin, Nebo Annex Marine Base, Marine Corp Logistics Base Yermo, Edwards AFB, 29 Palms Marine Base and Camp
Pendleton
Workers required to suit up and work in a hazardous material environment: $2.00 per hour additional. Combination mixer and compressor operator on gunite work shall be classified as a concrete mobile mixer operator.

SEE ZONE DEFINITIONS AFTER CLASSIFICATIONS

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Bargeman; Brakeman; Compressor operator; Ditch Witch, with seat or similar type equipment; Elevator
operator-inside; Engineer Oiler; Forklift operator
(includes loed, lull or similar types under 5 tons;
Generator operator; Generator, pump or compressor plant operator; Pump operator; Signalman; Switchman
GROUP 2: Asphalt-rubber plant operator (nurse tank operator); Concrete mixer operator-skip type; Conveyor operator;
Fireman; Forklift operator (includes loed, lull or similar types over 5 tons; Hydrostatic pump operator; oiler crusher (asphalt or concrete plant); Petromat laydown machine; PJU side dum jack; Screening and conveyor machine operator (or similar types); Skiploader (wheel type up to 3/4 yd.
without attachment); Tar pot fireman; Temporary heating plant operator; Trenching machine oiler
GROUP 3: Asphalt-rubber blend operator; Bobcat or similar type (Skid steer); Equipment greaser (rack); Ford Ferguson (with dragtype attachments); Helicopter radioman (ground); Stationary pipe wrapping and cleaning machine operator
GROUP 4: Asphalt plant fireman; Backhoe operator (mini-max or similar type); Boring machine operator; Boxman or mixerman (asphalt or concrete); Chip spreading machine operator; Concrete cleaning decontamination machine operator;
Concrete Pump Operator (small portable); Drilling machine operator, small auger types (Texoma super economatic or similar types - Hughes 100 or 200 or similar types -
drilling depth of 30' maximum); Equipment greaser (grease truck); Guard rail post driver operator; Highline cableway signalman; Hydra-hammer-aero stomper; Micro Tunneling
(above ground tunnel); Power concrete curing machine
operator; Power concrete saw operator; Power-driven jumbo form setter operator; Power sweeper operator; Rock Wheel Saw/Trencher; Roller operator (compacting); Screed operator 317
(asphalt or concrete); Trenching machine operator (up to 6 ft.); Vacuum or much truck
GROUP 5: Equipment Greaser (Grease Truck/Multi Shift).

GROUP 6: Articulating material hauler; Asphalt plant
engineer; Batch plant operator; Bit sharpener; Concrete joint machine operator (canal and similar type); Concrete planer operator; Dandy digger; Deck engine operator;
Derrickman (oilfield type); Drilling machine operator,
bucket or auger types (Calweld 100 bucket or similar types - Watson 1000 auger or similar types - Texoma 330, 500 or 600 auger or similar types - drilling depth of 45'
maximum); Drilling machine operator; Hydrographic seeder machine operator (straw, pulp or seed), Jackson track
maintainer, or similar type; Kalamazoo Switch tamper, or similar type; Machine tool operator; Maginnis internal full slab vibrator, Mechanical berm, curb or gutter(concrete or asphalt); Mechanical finisher operator (concrete,
Clary-Johnson-Bidwell or similar); Micro tunnel system
(below ground); Pavement breaker operator (truck mounted); Road oil mixing machine operator; Roller operator (asphalt or finish), rubber-tired earth moving equipment (single engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck); Self-propelled tar pipelining machine operator; Skiploader operator
(crawler and wheel type, over 3/4 yd. and up to and
including 1-1/2 yds.); Slip form pump operator (power
driven hydraulic lifting device for concrete forms);
Tractor operator-bulldozer, tamper-scraper (single engine, up to 100 h.p. flywheel and similar types, up to and
including D-5 and similar types); Tugger hoist operator (1 drum); Ultra high pressure waterjet cutting tool system operator; Vacuum blasting machine operator
GROUP 8: Asphalt or concrete spreading operator (tamping or finishing); Asphalt paving machine operator (Barber Greene or similar type); Asphalt-rubber distribution operator; Backhoe operator (up to and including 3/4 yd.), small ford, Case or similar; Cast-in-place pipe laying machine
operator; Combination mixer and compressor operator (gunite work); Compactor operator (self-propelled); Concrete mixer operator (paving); Crushing plant operator; Drill Doctor; Drilling machine operator, Bucket or auger types (Calweld 150 bucket or similar types - Watson 1500, 2000 2500 auger or similar types - Texoma 700, 800 auger or similar types - drilling depth of 60' maximum); Elevating grader operator; Grade checker; Gradall operator; Grouting machine operator; Heavy-duty repairman; Heavy equipment robotics operator; Kalamazoo balliste regulator or similar type; Kolman belt loader and similar type; Le Tourneau blob compactor or
similar type; Loader operator (Athey, Euclid, Sierra and similar types); Mobark Chipper or similar; Ozzie padder or similar types; P.C. slot saw; Pneumatic concrete placing machine operator (Hackley-Presswell or similar type);
Pumpcrete gun operator; Rock Drill or similar types; Rotary drill operator (excluding caisson type); Rubber-tired
earth-moving equipment operator (single engine,
caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds. up to and including 50 cu. yds. struck); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator (multiple engine up to and including 25 yds. struck);
Rubber-tired scraper operator (self-loading paddle wheel type-John Deere, 1040 and similar single unit); Self-
propelled curb and gutter machine operator; Shuttle buggy; Skiploader operator (crawler and wheel type over 1-1/2 yds. 318
up to and including 6-1/2 yds.); Soil remediation plant operator; Surface heaters and planer operator; Tractor
compressor drill combination operator; Tractor operator (any type larger than D-5 - 100 flywheel h.p. and over, or similar-bulldozer, tamper, scraper and push tractor single engine); Tractor operator (boom attachments), Traveling pipe wrapping, cleaning and bendng machine operator;
Trenching machine operator (over 6 ft. depth capacity,
manufacturer's rating); trenching Machine with Road Miner attachment (over 6 ft depth capacity): Ultra high pressure waterjet cutting tool system mechanic; Water pull
(compaction) operator
GROUP 9: Heavy Duty Repairman
GROUP 10: Drilling machine operator, Bucket or auger types (Calweld 200 B bucket or similar types-Watson 3000 or 5000 auger or similar types-Texoma 900 auger or similar
types-drilling depth of 105' maximum); Dual drum mixer, dynamic compactor LDC350 (or similar types); Monorail
locomotive operator (diesel, gas or electric); Motor
patrol-blade operator (single engine); Multiple engine
tractor operator (Euclid and similar type-except Quad 9 cat.); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator (single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Pneumatic pipe ramming tool and similar types; Prestressed wrapping machine operator; Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator (single
engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber tired earth moving equipment operator (multiple engine, Euclid, caterpillar and similar over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck), Tower crane repairman; Tractor loader operator (crawler and wheel type over 6-1/2 yds.); Woods mixer operator (and similar Pugmill equipment)
GROUP 11: Heavy Duty Repairman - Welder Combination, Welder - Certified.

GROUP 12: Auto grader operator; Automatic slip form operator; Drilling machine operator, bucket or auger types (Calweld, auger 200 CA or similar types - Watson, auger 6000 or
similar types - Hughes Super Duty, auger 200 or similar types - drilling depth of 175' maximum); Hoe ram or similar with compressor; Mass excavator operator less tha 750 cu. yards; Mechanical finishing machine operator; Mobile form traveler operator; Motor patrol operator (multi-engine); Pipe mobile machine operator; Rubber-tired earth- moving equipment operator (multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar type, over 50 cu. yds. struck); Rubber-tired self- loading scraper operator (paddle-wheel-auger type self-loading - two (2) or more units)
GROUP 13: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator
operating equipment with push-pull system (single engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 14: Canal liner operator; Canal trimmer operator; Remote- control earth-moving equipment operator (operating a second piece of equipment: $1.00 per hour additional); Wheel excavator operator (over 750 cu. yds.)
GROUP 15: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system (single engine, Caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds. and up to and including 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, 319
operating equipment with push-pull system (multiple
engine-up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 16: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system (single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system
(multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar, over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck)
GROUP 17: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with push-pull system (multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar, over 50 cu. yds. struck); Tandem tractor operator (operating crawler type tractors in tandem - Quad 9 and similar type)
GROUP 18: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar
types in any combination, excluding compaction units -
single engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 19: Rotex concrete belt operator (or similar types); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar types in any
combination, excluding compaction units - single engine, Caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds.and up to and including 50 cu. yds. struck); Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment
operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar types in any combination, excluding compaction
units - multiple engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck) GROUP 20: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar
types in any combination, excluding compaction units -
single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired
earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem
(scrapers, belly dumps, and similar types in any
combination, excluding compaction units - multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar, over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck)
GROUP 21: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating in tandem (scrapers, belly dumps and similar
types in any combination, excluding compaction units -
multiple engine, Euclid, Caterpillar and similar type, over 50 cu. yds. struck)
GROUP 22: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system
(single engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 23: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system
(single engine, Caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon and
similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds. and up to and including 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired
earth-moving equipment operator, operating with the tandem push-pull system (multiple engine, up to and including 25 yds. struck)
GROUP 24: Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system
(single engine, over 50 yds. struck); Rubber-tired
earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with 320
the tandem push-pull system (multiple engine, Euclid,
Caterpillar and similar, over 25 yds. and up to 50 yds. struck)
GROUP 25: Concrete pump operator-truck mounted; Rubber-tired earth-moving equipment operator, operating equipment with the tandem push-pull system (multiple engine, Euclid,
Caterpillar and similar type, over 50 cu. yds. struck)

CRANES, PILEDRIVING AND HOISTING EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATIONS GROUP 1: Engineer oiler; Fork lift operator (includes loed, lull or similar types)
GROUP 2: Truck crane oiler
GROUP 3: A-frame or winch truck operator; Ross carrier
operator (jobsite)
GROUP 4: Bridge-type unloader and turntable operator;
Helicopter hoist operator
GROUP 5: Hydraulic boom truck; Stinger crane (Austin-Western or similar type); Tugger hoist operator (1 drum)
GROUP 6: Bridge crane operator; Cretor crane operator; Hoist operator (Chicago boom and similar type); Lift mobile
operator; Lift slab machine operator (Vagtborg and similar types); Material hoist and/or manlift operator; Polar
gantry crane operator; Self Climbing scaffold (or similar type); Shovel, backhoe, dragline, clamshell operator (over 3/4 yd. and up to 5 cu. yds. mrc); Tugger hoist operator GROUP 7: Pedestal crane operator; Shovel, backhoe, dragline, clamshell operator (over 5 cu. yds. mrc); Tower crane
repair; Tugger hoist operator (3 drum)
GROUP 8: Crane operator (up to and including 25 ton
capacity); Crawler transporter operator; Derrick barge
operator (up to and including 25 ton capacity); Hoist
operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (up to and including 25 ton capacity); Shovel, backhoe, dragline, clamshell operator (over 7 cu. yds., M.R.C.)
GROUP 9: Crane operator (over 25 tons and up to and including 50 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 25 tons up to and including 50 tons mrc); Highline cableway operator; Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 25 tons up to and including 50 tons mrc); K-crane operator; Polar crane operator; Self erecting tower crane operator maximum lifting capacity ten tons
GROUP 10: Crane operator (over 50 tons and up to and
including 100 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 50 tons up to and including 100 tons mrc); Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 50 tons up to and including 100 tons mrc), Mobile tower crane operator (over 50 tons, up to and including 100 tons M.R.C.); Tower crane operator and tower gantry
GROUP 11: Crane operator (over 100 tons and up to and
including 200 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 100 tons up to and including 200 tons mrc); Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 100 tons up to and including 200 tons mrc); Mobile tower crane operator 321
(over 100 tons up to and including 200 tons mrc)
GROUP 12: Crane operator (over 200 tons up to and including 300 tons mrc); Derrick barge operator (over 200 tons up to and including 300 tons mrc); Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 200 tons, up to and
including 300 tons mrc); Mobile tower crane operator (over 200 tons, up to and including 300 tons mrc)
GROUP 13: Crane operator (over 300 tons); Derrick barge operator (over 300 tons); Helicopter pilot; Hoist operator, stiff legs, Guy derrick or similar type (over 300 tons); Mobile tower crane operator (over 300 tons)

TUNNEL CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Skiploader (wheel type up to 3/4 yd. without
attachment)
GROUP 2: Power-driven jumbo form setter operator
GROUP 3: Dinkey locomotive or motorperson (up to and
including 10 tons)
GROUP 4: Bit sharpener; Equipment greaser (grease truck); Slip form pump operator (power-driven hydraulic lifting device for concrete forms); Tugger hoist operator (1 drum); Tunnel locomotive operator (over 10 and up to and including 30 tons)
GROUP 5: Backhoe operator (up to and including 3/4 yd.); Small Ford, Case or similar; Drill doctor; Grouting machine operator; Heading shield operator; Heavy-duty repairperson; Loader operator (Athey, Euclid, Sierra and similar types); Mucking machine operator (1/4 yd., rubber-tired, rail or track type); Pneumatic concrete placing machine operator (Hackley-Presswell or similar type); Pneumatic heading
shield (tunnel); Pumpcrete gun operator; Tractor compressor drill combination operator; Tugger hoist operator (2 drum); Tunnel locomotive operator (over 30 tons)
GROUP 6: Heavy Duty Repairman
GROUP 7: Tunnel mole boring machine operator

ENGINEERS ZONES
$1.00 additional per hour for all of IMPERIAL County and the portions of KERN, RIVERSIDE & SAN BERNARDINO Counties as defined below:

That area within the following Boundary: Begin in San
Bernardino County, approximately 3 miles NE of the intersection of I-15 and the California State line at that point which is the NW corner of Section 1, T17N,m R14E, San Bernardino Meridian. Continue W in a straight line to that point which is the SW corner of the northwest quarter of Section 6, T27S, R42E, Mt. Diablo Meridian. Continue North to the intersection with the Inyo County Boundary at that point which is the NE corner of the western half of the northern quarter of Section 6, T25S, R42E, MDM. Continue W along the Inyo and San
Bernardino County boundary until the intersection with Kern County, as that point which is the SE corner of Section 34, T24S, R40E, MDM. Continue W along the Inyo and Kern County boundary until the intersection with Tulare County, at that 322
point which is the SW corner of the SE quarter of Section 32, T24S, R37E, MDM. Continue W along the Kern and Tulare County boundary, until that point which is the NW corner of T25S, R32E, MDM. Continue S following R32E lines to the NW corner of T31S, R32E, MDM. Continue W to the NW corner of T31S, R31E, MDM. Continue S to the SW corner of T32S, R31E, MDM. Continue W to SW corner of SE quarter of Section 34, T32S, R30E, MDM.

Continue S to SW corner of T11N, R17W, SBM. Continue E along south boundary of T11N, SBM to SW corner of T11N, R7W, SBM.

Continue S to SW corner of T9N, R7W, SBM. Continue E along south boundary of T9N, SBM to SW corner of T9N, R1E, SBM.

Continue S along west boundary of R1E, SMB to Riverside County line at the SW corner of T1S, R1E, SBM. Continue E along south boundary of T1s, SBM (Riverside County Line) to SW corner of T1S, R10E, SBM. Continue S along west boundary of R10E, SBM to Imperial County line at the SW corner of T8S, R10E, SBM.

Continue W along Imperial and Riverside county line to NW corner of T9S, R9E, SBM. Continue S along the boundary between Imperial and San Diego Counties, along the west edge of R9E, SBM to the south boundary of Imperial County/California state line. Follow the California state line west to Arizona state line, then north to Nevada state line, then continuing NW back to start at the point which is the NW corner of Section 1, T17N, R14E, SBM
$1.00 additional per hour for portions of SAN LUIS OBISPO, KERN, SANTA BARBARA & VENTURA as defined below:

That area within the following Boundary: Begin approximately 5 miles north of the community of Cholame, on the Monterey County and San Luis Obispo County boundary at the NW corner of T25S, R16E, Mt. Diablo Meridian. Continue south along the west side of R16E to the SW corner of T30S, R16E, MDM. Continue E to SW corner of T30S, R17E, MDM. Continue S to SW corner of T31S, R17E, MDM. Continue E to SW corner of T31S, R18E, MDM.

Continue S along West side of R18E, MDM as it crosses into San Bernardino Meridian numbering area and becomes R30W. Follow the west side of R30W, SBM to the SW corner of T9N, R30W, SBM.

Continue E along the south edge of T9N, SBM to the Santa Barbara County and Ventura County boundary at that point whch is the SW corner of Section 34.T9N, R24W, SBM, continue S along the Ventura County line to that point which is the SW corner of the SE quarter of Section 32, T7N, R24W, SBM. Continue E along the south edge of T7N, SBM to the SE corner to T7N, R21W, SBM. Continue N along East side of R21W, SBM to Ventura County and Kern County boundary at the NE corner of T8N, R21W.

Continue W along the Ventura County and Kern County boundary to the SE corner of T9N, R21W. Continue North along the East edge of R21W, SBM to the NE corner of T12N, R21W, SBM. Continue West along the north edge of T12N, SBM to the SE corner of T32S, R21E, MDM. [T12N SBM is a think strip between T11N SBM and T32S MDM]. Continue North along the East side of R21E, MDM to the Kings County and Kern County border at the NE corner of T25S, R21E, MDM, continue West along the Kings County and Kern County Boundary until the intersection of San Luis Obispo County. Continue west along the Kings County and San Luis Obispo County boundary until the intersection with Monterey County. Continue West along the Monterey County and San Luis Obispo County boundary to the beginning point at the NW corner of T25S, R16E, MDM.
$2.00 additional per hour for INYO and MONO Counties and the Northern portion of SAN BERNARDINO County as defined below:
323
That area within the following Boundary: Begin at the
intersection of the northern boundary of Mono County and the California state line at the point which is the center of Section 17, T10N, R22E, Mt. Diablo Meridian. Continue S then SE along the entire western boundary of Mono County, until it reaches Inyo County at the point which is the NE corner of the Western half of the NW quarter of Section 2, T8S, R29E, MDM.

Continue SSE along the entire western boundary of Inyo County, until the intersection with Kern County at the point which is the SW corner of the SE 1/4 of Section 32, T24S, R37E, MDM.

Continue E along the Inyo and Kern County boundary until the intersection with San Bernardino County at that point which is the SE corner of section 34, T24S, R40E, MDM. Continue E along the Inyo and San Bernardino County boundary until the point which is the NE corner of the Western half of the NW quarter of Section 6, T25S, R42E, MDM. Continue S to that point which is the SW corner of the NW quarter of Section 6, T27S, R42E, MDM.

Continue E in a straight line to the California and Nevada state border at the point which is the NW corner of Section 1, T17N, R14E, San Bernardino Meridian. Then continue NW along the state line to the starting point, which is the center of Section 18, T10N, R22E, MDM.

REMAINING AREA NOT DEFINED ABOVE RECIEVES BASE RATE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ENGI0012-004 08/01/2020
Rates Fringes
OPERATOR: Power Equipment
(DREDGING)
(1) Leverman................$ 56.40 30.00
(2) Dredge dozer............$ 50.43 30.00
(3) Deckmate................$ 50.32 30.00
(4) Winch operator (stern
winch on dredge)............$ 49.77 30.00
(5) Fireman-Oiler,
Deckhand, Bargeman,
Leveehand...................$ 49.23 30.00
(6) Barge Mate..............$ 49.84 30.00
---------------------------------------------------------------- IRON0433-006 07/01/2020
Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER
Fence Erector...............$ 34.58 24.81
Ornamental, Reinforcing
and Structural..............$ 41.00 33.45
PREMIUM PAY:
$6.00 additional per hour at the following locations:

China Lake Naval Test Station, Chocolate Mountains Naval Reserve-Niland,
Edwards AFB, Fort Irwin Military Station, Fort Irwin Training Center-Goldstone, San Clemente Island, San Nicholas Island, Susanville Federal Prison, 29 Palms - Marine Corps, U.S. Marine Base - Barstow, U.S. Naval Air Facility - Sealey, Vandenberg AFB $4.00 additional per hour at the following locations:
324
Army Defense Language Institute - Monterey, Fallon Air Base, Naval Post Graduate School - Monterey, Yermo Marine Corps Logistics Center
$2.00 additional per hour at the following locations:

Port Hueneme, Port Mugu, U.S. Coast Guard Station - Two Rock ---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0300-001 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Brick Tender.....................$ 35.82 20.45
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0300-003 07/01/2020
Rates Fringes

LABORER (TUNNEL)
GROUP 1.....................$ 42.54 21.04
GROUP 2.....................$ 42.86 21.04
GROUP 3.....................$ 43.32 21.04
GROUP 4.....................$ 44.01 21.04

LABORER
GROUP 1.....................$ 36.39 21.04
GROUP 2.....................$ 36.94 21.04
GROUP 3.....................$ 37.49 21.04
GROUP 4.....................$ 39.04 21.04
GROUP 5.....................$ 39.39 21.04

LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Cleaning and handling of panel forms; Concrete screeding for rough strike-off; Concrete, water curing; Demolition laborer, the cleaning of brick if performed by a worker performing any other phase of demolition work, and the cleaning of lumber; Fire watcher, limber, brush loader, piler and debris handler; Flag person; Gas, oil and/or
water pipeline laborer; Laborer, asphalt-rubber material loader; Laborer, general or construction; Laborer, general clean-up; Laborer, landscaping; Laborer, jetting; Laborer, temporary water and air lines; Material hose operator
(walls, slabs, floors and decks); Plugging, filling of shee bolt holes; Dry packing of concrete; Railroad maintenance, repair track person and road beds; Streetcar and railroad construction track laborers; Rigging and signaling; Scaler; Slip form raiser; Tar and mortar; Tool crib or tool house laborer; Traffic control by any method; Window cleaner; Wire mesh pulling - all concrete pouring operations
GROUP 2: Asphalt shoveler; Cement dumper (on 1 yd. or larger mixer and handling bulk cement); Cesspool digger and
installer; Chucktender; Chute handler, pouring concrete, the handling of the chute from readymix trucks, such as walls, slabs, decks, floors, foundation, footings, curbs, gutters and sidewalks; Concrete curer, impervious membrane and form oiler; Cutting torch operator (demolition); Fine grader, highways and street paving, airport, runways and similar type heavy construction; Gas, oil and/or water
pipeline wrapper - pot tender and form person; Guinea
chaser; Headerboard person - asphalt; Laborer, packing rod steel and pans; Membrane vapor barrier installer; Power broom sweeper (small); Riprap stonepaver, placing stone or 325
wet sacked concrete; Roto scraper and tiller; Sandblaster (pot tender); Septic tank digger and installer(lead); Tank scaler and cleaner; Tree climber, faller, chain saw
operator, Pittsburgh chipper and similar type brush
shredder; Underground laborer, including caisson bellower GROUP 3: Buggymobile person; Concrete cutting torch; Concrete pile cutter; Driller, jackhammer, 2-1/2 ft. drill steel or longer; Dri-pak-it machine; Gas, oil and/or water pipeline wrapper, 6-in. pipe and over, by any method, inside and out; High scaler (including drilling of same); Hydro seeder and similar type; Impact wrench multi-plate; Kettle person, pot person and workers applying asphalt, lay-kold,
creosote, lime caustic and similar type materials
(""applying"" means applying, dipping, brushing or handling of such materials for pipe wrapping and waterproofing); Operator of pneumatic, gas, electric tools, vibrating
machine, pavement breaker, air blasting, come-alongs, and similar mechanical tools not separately classified herein; Pipelayer's backup person, coating, grouting, making of joints, sealing, caulking, diapering and including rubber gasket joints, pointing and any and all other services; Rock slinger; Rotary scarifier or multiple head concrete chipping scarifier; Steel headerboard and guideline setter; Tamper, Barko, Wacker and similar type; Trenching machine, hand-propelled
GROUP 4: Asphalt raker, lute person, ironer, asphalt dump person, and asphalt spreader boxes (all types); Concrete core cutter (walls, floors or ceilings), grinder or sander; Concrete saw person, cutting walls or flat work, scoring old or new concrete; Cribber, shorer, lagging, sheeting and trench bracing, hand-guided lagging hammer; Head rock
slinger; Laborer, asphalt- rubber distributor boot person; Laser beam in connection with laborers' work; Oversize
concrete vibrator operator, 70 lbs. and over; Pipelayer performing all services in the laying and installation of pipe from the point of receiving pipe in the ditch until completion of operation, including any and all forms of tubular material, whether pipe, metallic or non-metallic, conduit and any other stationary type of tubular device used for the conveying of any substance or element, whether water, sewage, solid gas, air, or other product whatsoever and without regard to the nature of material from which the tubular material is fabricated; No-joint pipe and stripping of same; Prefabricated manhole installer; Sandblaster
(nozzle person), water blasting, Porta Shot-Blast
GROUP 5: Blaster powder, all work of loading holes, placing and blasting of all powder and explosives of whatever type, regardless of method used for such loading and placing; Driller: All power drills, excluding jackhammer, whether core, diamond, wagon, track, multiple unit, and any and all other types of mechanical drills without regard to the form of motive power; Toxic waste removal

TUNNEL LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Batch plant laborer; Changehouse person; Dump
person; Dump person (outside); Swamper (brake person and switch person on tunnel work); Tunnel materials handling person; Nipper; Pot tender, using mastic or other materials (for example, but not by way of limitation, shotcrete, etc.) GROUP 2: Chucktender, cabletender; Loading and unloading 326
agitator cars;; Vibrator person, jack hammer, pneumatic tools (except driller); Bull gang mucker, track person; Concrete crew, including rodder and spreader
GROUP 3: Blaster, driller, powder person; Chemical grout jet person; Cherry picker person; Grout gun person; Grout mixer person; Grout pump person; Jackleg miner; Jumbo person; Kemper and other pneumatic concrete placer operator; Miner, tunnel (hand or machine); Nozzle person; Operating of
troweling and/or grouting machines; Powder person (primer house); Primer person; Sandblaster; Shotcrete person; Steel form raiser and setter; Timber person, retimber person, wood or steel; Tunnel Concrete finisher
GROUP 4: Diamond driller; Sandblaster; Shaft and raise work ---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0300-005 03/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Asbestos Removal Laborer.........$ 37.49 21.88
SCOPE OF WORK: Includes site mobilization, initial site cleanup, site preparation, removal of asbestos-containing material and toxic waste, encapsulation, enclosure and
disposal of asbestos- containing materials and toxic waste by hand or with equipment or machinery; scaffolding,
fabrication of temporary wooden barriers and assembly of decontamination stations.
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO0345-001 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes

LABORER (GUNITE)
GROUP 1.....................$ 46.50 20.42
GROUP 2.....................$ 45.55 20.42
GROUP 3.....................$ 42.01 20.42
FOOTNOTE: GUNITE PREMIUM PAY: Workers working from a
Bosn'n's Chair or suspended from a rope or cable shall
receive 40 cents per hour above the foregoing applicable classification rates. Workers doing gunite and/or
shotcrete work in a tunnel shall receive 35 cents per hour above the foregoing applicable classification rates, paid on a portal-to-portal basis. Any work performed on, in or above any smoke stack, silo, storage elevator or similar type of structure, when such structure is in excess of
75'-0"" above base level and which work must be performed in whole or in part more than 75'-0"" above base level, that work performed above the 75'-0"" level shall be compensated for at 35 cents per hour above the applicable
classification wage rate.

GUNITE LABORER CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Rodmen, Nozzlemen
GROUP 2: Gunmen
GROUP 3: Reboundmen
---------------------------------------------------------------- 327
LABO1184-001 07/01/2021
Rates Fringes
Laborers: (HORIZONTAL

DIRECTIONAL DRILLING)
(1) Drilling Crew Laborer...$ 38.89 17.10
(2) Vehicle Operator/Hauler.$ 39.06 17.10
(3) Horizontal Directional
Drill Operator..............$ 40.91 17.10
(4) Electronic Tracking
Locator.....................$ 42.91 17.10
Laborers: (STRIPING/SLURRY
SEAL)
GROUP 1.....................$ 40.10 20.12
GROUP 2.....................$ 41.40 20.12
GROUP 3.....................$ 43.41 20.12
GROUP 4.....................$ 45.15 20.12

LABORERS - STRIPING CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Protective coating, pavement sealing, including repair and filling of cracks by any method on any surface in parking lots, game courts and playgrounds; carstops; operation of all related machinery and equipment; equipment repair technician
GROUP 2: Traffic surface abrasive blaster; pot tender - removal of all traffic lines and markings by any method (sandblasting, waterblasting, grinding, etc.) and
preparation of surface for coatings. Traffic control
person: controlling and directing traffic through both
conventional and moving lane closures; operation of all related machinery and equipment
GROUP 3: Traffic delineating device applicator: Layout and application of pavement markers, delineating signs, rumble and traffic bars, adhesives, guide markers, other traffic delineating devices including traffic control. This
category includes all traffic related surface preparation (sandblasting, waterblasting, grinding) as part of the
application process. Traffic protective delineating system installer: removes, relocates, installs, permanently
affixed roadside and parking delineation barricades,
fencing, cable anchor, guard rail, reference signs,
monument markers; operation of all related machinery and equipment; power broom sweeper
GROUP 4: Striper: layout and application of traffic stripes and markings; hot thermo plastic; tape traffic stripes and markings, including traffic control; operation of all
related machinery and equipment
---------------------------------------------------------------- LABO1414-001 08/05/2020
Rates Fringes

LABORER
PLASTER CLEAN-UP LABORER....$ 36.03 21.01
PLASTER TENDER..............$ 38.58 21.01
Work on a swing stage scaffold: $1.00 per hour additional. ---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0036-001 07/01/2020
328
Rates Fringes
Painters: (Including Lead
Abatement)
(1) Repaint (excludes San
Diego County)...............$ 29.59 17.12
(2) All Other Work..........$ 33.12 17.24
REPAINT of any previously painted structure. Exceptions:
work involving the aerospace industry, breweries,
commercial recreational facilities, hotels which operate commercial establishments as part of hotel service, and sports facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0036-006 10/01/2021
Rates Fringes

DRYWALL FINISHER/TAPER
Antelope Valley North of
the following Boundary:

Kern County Line to Hwy.
#5, South on Hwy. #5 to
Hwy. N2, East on N2 to
Palmdale Blvd., to Hwy.
#14, South to Hwy. #18,
East to Hwy. #395...........$ 39.50 22.92
Remainder of Los Angeles
County......................$ 43.63 22.92
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN0036-015 01/01/2020
Rates Fringes
GLAZIER..........................$ 43.45 23.39
FOOTNOTE: Additional $1.25 per hour for work in a condor, from the third (3rd) floor and up Additional $1.25 per
hour for work on the outside of the building from a swing stage or any suspended contrivance, from the ground up
---------------------------------------------------------------- PAIN1247-002 01/01/2021
Rates Fringes
SOFT FLOOR LAYER.................$ 38.75 14.03
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLAS0200-009 08/04/2021
Rates Fringes
PLASTERER........................$ 45.77 18.39
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLAS0500-002 07/01/2020
Rates Fringes
CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 38.50 25.91
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0016-001 09/01/2021
Rates Fringes
329

PLUMBER/PIPEFITTER
Work ONLY on new additions
and remodeling of bars,
restaurant, stores and
commercial buildings not
to exceed 5,000 sq. ft. of
floor space.................$ 52.20 24.38
Work ONLY on strip malls,
light commercial, tenant
improvement and remodel
work........................$ 39.91 22.71
All other work except work
on new additions and
remodeling of bars,
restaurant, stores and
commercial buildings not
to exceed 5,000 sq. ft. of
floor space and work on
strip malls, light
commercial, tenant
improvement and remodel
work........................$ 53.83 25.36
---------------------------------------------------------------- PLUM0345-001 09/01/2021
Rates Fringes

PLUMBER
Landscape/Irrigation Fitter.$ 36.85 24.75
Sewer & Storm Drain Work....$ 40.94 22.13
---------------------------------------------------------------- ROOF0036-002 08/01/2021
Rates Fringes
ROOFER...........................$ 42.07 18.92
FOOTNOTE: Pitch premium: Work on which employees are exposed to pitch fumes or required to handle pitch, pitch base or pitch impregnated products, or any material containing coal tar pitch, the entire roofing crew shall receive $1.75 per hour ""pitch premium"" pay.
---------------------------------------------------------------- SFCA0669-013 04/01/2022

DOES NOT INCLUDE THE CITY OF POMONA, CATALINA ISLAND, AND THAT PART OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY WITHIN 25 MILES OF THE CITY LIMITS OF LOS ANGELES:

Rates Fringes
SPRINKLER FITTER.................$ 43.25 26.77
---------------------------------------------------------------- SFCA0709-005 01/01/2021

THE CITY OF POMOMA, CATALINA ISLAND, AND THAT PART OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY WITHIN 25 MILES OF THE CITY LIMITS OF LOS ANGELES:

Rates Fringes
330
SPRINKLER FITTER (Fire)..........$ 48.71 29.15
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0105-002 07/01/2021
LOS ANGELES (South of a straight line between Gorman and Big Pines including Catalina Island)
Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER
(1) Light Commercial: Work
on general sheet metal and
heating and AC up to 4000
sq ft.......................$ 30.14 10.74
(2) Modernization :

Excluding New Construction
- Under 5000 sq. ft. Does
not include modification,
upgrades, energy
management, or
conservation improvements
of central heating and AC
equpment....................$ 27.47 10.72
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0105-003 01/01/2022
LOS ANGELES (South of a straight line drawn between Gorman and Big Pines)and Catalina Island, INYO, KERN (Northeast part, East of Hwy 395), MONO ORANGE, RIVERSIDE, AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER
(1) Commercial - New
Construction and Remodel
work........................$ 50.23 29.60
(2) Industrial work
including air pollution
control systems, noise
abatement, hand rails,
guard rails, excluding
aritechtural sheet metal
work, excluding A-C,
heating, ventilating
systems for human comfort...$ 48.28 29.46
---------------------------------------------------------------- SHEE0105-004 01/01/2022
KERN (Excluding portion East of Hwy 395) & LOS ANGELES (North of a straight line drawn between Gorman and Big Pines including Cities of Lancaster and Palmdale) COUNTIES
Rates Fringes
SHEET METAL WORKER...............$ 39.08 28.84
---------------------------------------------------------------- TEAM0011-002 07/01/2020
Rates Fringes

TRUCK DRIVER
GROUP 1....................$ 32.59 30.59
331
GROUP 2....................$ 32.74 30.59
GROUP 3....................$ 32.87 30.59
GROUP 4....................$ 33.06 30.59
GROUP 5....................$ 33.09 30.59
GROUP 6....................$ 33.12 30.59
GROUP 7....................$ 33.37 30.59
GROUP 8....................$ 33.62 30.59
GROUP 9....................$ 33.82 30.59
GROUP 10....................$ 34.12 30.59
GROUP 11....................$ 34.62 30.59
GROUP 12....................$ 35.05 30.59
WORK ON ALL MILITARY BASES:

PREMIUM PAY: $3.00 per hour additional.
[29 palms Marine Base, Camp Roberts, China Lake, Edwards AFB, El Centro Naval Facility, Fort Irwin, Marine Corps
Logistics Base at Nebo & Yermo, Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport, Point Arguello, Point Conception,
Vandenberg AFB]

TRUCK DRIVERS CLASSIFICATIONS
GROUP 1: Truck driver
GROUP 2: Driver of vehicle or combination of vehicles - 2 axles; Traffic control pilot car excluding moving heavy equipment permit load; Truck mounted broom
GROUP 3: Driver of vehicle or combination of vehicles - 3 axles; Boot person; Cement mason distribution truck; Fuel truck driver; Water truck - 2 axle; Dump truck, less than 16 yds. water level; Erosion control driver
GROUP 4: Driver of transit mix truck, under 3 yds.; Dumpcrete truck, less than 6-1/2 yds. water level
GROUP 5: Water truck, 3 or more axles; Truck greaser and tire person ($0.50 additional for tire person); Pipeline and utility working truck driver, including winch truck and plastic fusion, limited to pipeline and utility work;
Slurry truck driver
GROUP 6: Transit mix truck, 3 yds. or more; Dumpcrete truck, 6-1/2 yds. water level and over; Vehicle or combination of vehicles - 4 or more axles; Oil spreader truck; Dump truck, 16 yds. to 25 yds. water level
GROUP 7: A Frame, Swedish crane or similar; Forklift driver; Ross carrier driver
GROUP 8: Dump truck, 25 yds. to 49 yds. water level; Truck repair person; Water pull - single engine; Welder
GROUP 9: Truck repair person/welder; Low bed driver, 9 axles or over
GROUP 10: Dump truck - 50 yds. or more water level; Water pull - single engine with attachment
GROUP 11: Water pull - twin engine; Water pull - twin engine with attachments; Winch truck driver - $1.25 additional when operating winch or similar special attachments
332
GROUP 12: Boom Truck 17K and above
---------------------------------------------------------------- WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing
operation to which welding is incidental.
================================================================ Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/government-contracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).
---------------------------------------------------------------- The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of ""identifiers"" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers
A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than ""SU"" or ""UAVG"" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this
classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.
333
Survey Rate Identifiers
Classifications listed under the ""SU"" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average
calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers
Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those
classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010
08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.
----------------------------------------------------------------

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:
* an existing published wage determination
* a survey underlying a wage determination
* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter
* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour National Office because National Office has responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.) and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations
334
Wage and Hour Division
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210
The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final. ================================================================ END OF GENERAL DECISIO"

335
EXHIBIT “F” – AGENCY REPORT OF CONTRACT AWARD
CIP NO. 601 & 698

CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
336

AGENCY REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARD
TO: Grants Management Unit (GMU) Date:

Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA)
FROM: Local Contracting Agency Name:

Project Name: Project Number:

A formal bid opening, or informal solicitation for this construction contract was held on: Date:

A Contract Subcontract was awarded to the contractor identified below on: Date:

The contract amount for the scope of work to be performed by this Contractor, as detailed below, is: Amount:

This is or is not a Section 3 qualified construction contract A Section 3 Pre-Bid Meeting was held on: Date:

A copy of the completed Section 3 Bid Evaluation form was provided to the LACDA on: Date:

The Contractor’s Eligibility was verified prior to the contract with search results from:

California Contractors State Licensing Board (CSLB) website (http://www.cslb.ca.gov) on: Date:

California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) website (https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/Search) on: Date:

California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) website (https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html on: Date:

Federal List of Parties Excluded from federal contract award website (https://beta.sam.gov) on: Date:

A Notice of Contract Award letter was sent to the U.S. Dept. of Labor, OFCCP (contracts $10,000 or more) on: Date:

The Contractor(s) acknowledge, by signature below, that: “This construction project is funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.” A copy of the Federal Labor Standards Provisions (HUD-4010 form), is attached to the contractor’s copy of this form.

A copy of the assigned Federal Wage Decision identified below will be attached to the contractor’s copy of this form.

Federal Wage Decision Number: CA _____________ Mod. ____, DATED _____________ (http://beta.SAM.gov/).

The Contractor(s) further acknowledges that the prevailing wage and fringe benefit rates must be paid to all workers each week.

Print Company Name above – Prime Contractor Subcontractor Print Company Name above – Subcontractor Lower-tier Employer Identification Number: Employer Identification Number:

Contractor License Number: Contractor License Number:

Authorized Signature of Company Representative Authorized Signature of Company Representative

Black American
White American
Hispanic American
Women Owned Business
Minority Owned Business
Section 3 Qualified Business
Native American
Hasidic Jews
Asian/Pacific American
Black American
White American
Hispanic American
Women Owned Business
Minority Owned Business
Section 3 Qualified Business
Native American
Hasidic Jews
Asian/Pacific American
Identify the detailed scope of work FOR THIS CONTRACTOR Estimated Start Date: Estimated Completion Date:
Identify the work classifications to be USED BY THIS CONTRACTOR at the construction site Estimated Workforce size:

Asbestos Worker Equipment Operator Group Lather Roofer
Bricklayer Glazier Marble setter Sheet metal worker
Carpenter Ironworker Painter Terrazzo Worker
Cement Mason Laborer Group Plasterer Tile layer
Electrician Labor/Striper Group Plumber (other)
337
Tips for completing the Agency Report of Contract Award form The Agency Report of Contract Award (ARCA) form will help the LCA to complete HUD’s Semi-Annual and Annual reporting requirements. Send a copy of the completed form(s) to the GMU Contract Compliance Officer via email. Process the ARCA as follows:
 Local Contracting Agency (LCA) must;
o Enter the basic project information on the form,
o Enter the dollar amount of the Prime Contract
o Explain the prevailing wage requirements as outlined in the specifications, o Do not sign the form until it is returned, completed by the prime sub, or lower-tier contractor, o Collect form from the contractor and review for accuracy, o Initial and email completed form(s) to GMU.
 Prime Contractor must;
o Provide an estimated start and end date, and a summary the Scope of Work, o Identify the basic trades and number of workers to be used on site, o Complete lower left section – business address and EEO portion, and o Sign and return the form to the LCA.
o Subcontractor form, provide the dollar amount of each subcontract  Ensure subcontractor has a copy of the HUD-4010 form & Federal Wage Decision  Collect form from the sub-contractor and review it for accuracy  Sign and forward the form to the LCA
 Sub and Lower-tier contractor must;
o Provide an estimated start and end date, and a summary the Scope of Work, o Identify the basic trades and number of workers to be used on site, o Complete lower right section – business address and EEO portion, and o Sign and return the form to the Prime Contractor.

1. Date of Public Bid Opening or Informal Solicitation Date: Date that the LCA held the public bid opening, or the date that the contract opened for vendor offers through informal solicitation.

2. Contract Award Date: Prime Contracts, the date that the contractor signed an agreement with the LCA.

Subcontracts, the date the subcontractor signed an agreement with, or work commenced for the prime contractor.

Lower-tier contracts, the date the lower-tier signed an agreement with, or work commenced for the subcontractor.

3. Section 3-Qualified Contracts: The LCA is required to conduct a presentation of the bid preference and hiring requirements of Section 3 during the PreBid Meeting. In addition, during the bid evaluations, the LCA will include a Section 3 analysis to determine each bidder’s Section 3 Responsiveness and provide GMU with a copy of their evaluation. A standard-format evaluation form is available for reference and use during the evaluation process.

4. Contractor Eligibility: Prior to awarding a contract for construction, the LCA must ensure the contractor is eligible to receive federal funds, and that the contractor’s license is current and active as part of the LCA bid evaluation process. The eligibility check includes:

1. Obtaining the state license number of each bidder and proposed sub-contractor

2. Contact the CA Contractor State License Board on-line at http://www.cslb.ca.gov

3. Enter the contractor’s license number and click on “Check License”

4. The License Detail page will display; Business Information, License Status, Personnel List, etc.

5. Print a copy of this page to assist in completing the contractor’s eligibility verification. a. First, access the CA Department of Industrial Relations websites:
i. at https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/Search.action for contractor public works registration status, and ii. at https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html to ensure that the contractor is not debarred b. Next, access the Federal List of Parties Excluded from receiving federal funds on-line at https://beta.sam.gov/

6. Print the results of your search and place a copy in the contractor’s Labor Standards Enforcement File

5. Contractor Acknowledgement: By signing this form the contractor(s) acknowledges that this project is federally-funded and the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts will be administered, monitored, and enforced by the LCA, or their assigned representative.

6. Federal Labor Standards Provisions: A copy of the current HUD-4010 form that outlines the labor requirements for each contractor must be included in the bid specifications for all formal competitive bids, or physically attached to each Prime Contract awarded for informal contracts under $25,000. The Prime Contractor must attach a current copy of the HUD-4010 form to each subcontract.

7. Federal Wage Decision: A copy of the current Wage Decision that identifies the minimum hourly wage and fringe benefit payments to workers must also be included in the bid specifications for all formal competitive bids, or physically attached to each Prime Contract awarded for informal contracts under $2,000.

The Prime Contractor must attach a copy of the applicable Wage Decision and HUD-4010 form to each subcontractor ARCA to ensure that each sub and lowertier contractor was informed of his/her obligation to pay prevailing hourly wages and fringe benefits to workers each week.

8. Contractor’s Acknowledgement: To pay workers each week no less than the hourly wage and fringe benefits rates identified in the assigned wage decision.

9. Notice of Contract Award: Within 10-days of the award date, a Notice of Contract Award letter must sent to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) at the address below for contracts awarded in the amount of $10,000 or more. Place a copy of the signed letter in the project file.

U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs 1640 South Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 440
Los Angeles, CA 90024
338
EXHIBIT “G” – COUNTY LOBBYIST CERTIFICATION
CIP NO. 601 & 698

CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
339
COUNTY LOBBYIST CODE CHAPTER 2.160
COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 93-0031

CERTIFICATION
Name of Firm: ____________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________________

State: ___________ Zip Code: _____________ Telephone Number: ( ) _______________________ Acting on behalf of the above named firm, as its Authorized Official, I make the following Certification to the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA).
1) It is understood that each person/entity/firm who applies for a Los Angeles County Development Authority contract, and as part of that process, shall certify that they are familiar with the requirements of the Los Angeles County Code, Chapter 2.160 (Los Angeles County Ordinance 93-0031) and;
2) That all persons/entities/firms acting on behalf of the above named firm have and will comply with the County Code, and;
3) That any person/entity/firm who seeks a contract with the Los Angeles County Development Authority shall be disqualified therefrom and denied the contract and, shall be liable in civil action, if any lobbyist, lobbying firm, lobbyist employer or any other person or entity acting on behalf of the named firm fails to comply with the provisions of the County Code.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into contract with Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles County Development Authority.

Authorized Official:
___________________________________ By: _______________________________________ (Contractor/Subcontractor) (Signature)
___________________________________ _______________________________________ (Date) (Title)
340
EXHIBIT “H” – NOTICING MAP
CIP NO. 601 & 698

CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
341
342
343
4 City of Hermosa Beach
II. NOTICE INVITING BIDS
Notice is hereby given that the City of Hermosa Beach will receive electronic bids until 2 P.M. on Tuesday, June 28th, 2022, at which time the electronic bids will be publicly opened at the City Clerk’s Office at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 and posted on Planet Bids for CIP No. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & CIP No. 698 ADA IMPROVEMENTS.

The project includes, but not limited to, the construction of ADA concrete ramps including the adjustment of utilities to grade, removal and construction of curb and gutter, repair of asphalt, thermoplastic/paint striping/markings and other miscellaneous work as needed to complete the intended construction of the ADA ramps, and all appurtenant work per plans and specifications.

The cost estimate for the project is $110,000. The duration of the project is 40 working days. License requirements are a valid State of California Contractors License Class “A”.

Bids will be received electronically on the Planet Bids Portal, accessible through the webpage at http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=667 where you must first register as a vendor through our Planet Bids portal. Contract Documents in PDF format including City Special Provisions and Project Plans, Standard Plans, Standard Specifications, or Reference Specifications shall be obtained from the link or website above.

Each proposal must be accompanied by a cash deposit, certified or cashier's check, or a bidder's bond, made payable to the City of Hermosa Beach, in an amount not less than 10 percent of the total bid submitted.

The successful bidder will be required to furnish a faithful performance bond in the amount of 100 percent of the contract price, and a payment bond in the amount of 100 percent of the contract price, both in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney. The successful bidder will also be required to pay the State of California prevailing wage scale as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations, available at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/dlsePublicWorks.html.

The Contractor must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations at the time of bid.

Contractor’s registration available at:
https://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Contractor-Registration.html The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any informality or irregularity in any bid received and to be the sole judge of the merits of the respective bids received. The award, if made, will be made to the lowest responsible bidder. Plans and Specifications will be available for review at City Hall.

This is a federally-assisted construction contract. Federal Labor Standards Provisions, including prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon and related Acts will be enforced. In the event of a conflict between Federal and State wages rates, the higher of the two will prevail. The Contractor’s duty to pay Sate prevailing wages can be found under Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and Labor Code Section 1775 and 1777.7 outline the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages and employment apprentices including forfeitures and debarment. 344
5 In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by sub-recipients, the conflictof-interest provision in (Sate LAC – 24 CFR 85.36 and Non-Profit Organizations – 24 CFR 84.4), OMB Circular A-110, and 24 CFR 570.611, respectively, shall apply. No employee, officer or agent of the sub-recipient shall participate in selection, or in the award or administration of a contract supported by Federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved.

Attention is directed to Section 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code and Title 8, California Administrative code, Section 200 et seq. to ensure compliance and completely understand of the law regarding apprentices.

Contract Documents in PDF format including City Special Provisions and Project Plans, Standard Plans, Standard Specifications, or Reference Specifications shall be obtained from the City of Hermosa Beach Public Works Department webpage at
http://www.hermosabch.org/index.aspx?page=667 or Planet Bids where you must first register as a vendor through our Planet Bids vendor portal. For any questions, please submit on Planet Bids or contact the Project Manager, Jonathan Pascual, by email at [email protected] All questions regarding this bid must be submitted in writing no later than 12:00 p.m., Thursday, June 16th, 2022, to the project manager by email.

345
346
Gentry General Engineering, Inc
9277 Archibald Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 330-1128
CIP No. 601 Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps
&
CIP No. 698 ADA Improvements
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to protest the proposals submitted by Ruiz Concrete and Paving, Inc and Falkon Construction, Inc for the bid titled “CIP No. 601 Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps and CIP No. 698 ADA Improvements” on June 28, 2022.

Bid submittals from the two aforementioned contractors were requested by us on June 29 and provided on July 6. We believe that both proposals should be found unresponsive on the following grounds:
• The eBid Instructions required that a Certificate of Non-Discrimination be included for all subcontractors; neither protested bidder did so.
• The eBid Instructions required that an Equal Employment Opportunity Certification be included for all subcontractors; neither protested bidder did so. • The Worker’s Compensation Certification included in Exhibit C of the project specifications (page 139) was required with the bid submittal; neither protested bidder included this in their proposal.
• The Non-Segregated Facilities Certification included in Exhibit C of the project specifications (page 140) was required with the bid submittal; neither protested bidder included this in their proposal.
347
• The Past Performance Certification included in Exhibit C of the project specifications (page 141) was required with the bid submittal; neither protested bidder included this in their proposal.
• The Notice of Equal Employment Opportunity included in Exhibit C of the project specifications (page 152) was required with the bid submittal; neither protested bidder included this in their proposal.
• The Federal Lobbyist Certification included in Exhibit C of the project specifications (page 154) was required with the bid submittal; neither protested bidder included this in their proposal.

Supporting documentation is attached.

Thank you,
Brenton Gentry
President and CEO, Gentry General Engineering, Inc
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
Request 22-196 - NextRequest - Modern FOIA & Public Records Reque... https://cityofhermosabeach-ca.nextrequest.com/requests/22-196 1 of 2 7/7/2022, 6:01 PM
356
Request 22-196 - NextRequest - Modern FOIA & Public Records Reque... https://cityofhermosabeach-ca.nextrequest.com/requests/22-196 2 of 2 7/7/2022, 6:01 PM
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0494
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022
SUBJECT: FINAL MAP NO. 82983 (C.U.P CON NO. 20-2, PDP NO, 20-5); LOCATION: 622 1st PLACE; APPLICANT(S): NICK LIND; REQUEST: TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING

FINAL PARCEL MAP FOR A TWO-UNIT RESIDENTIAL

CONDOMINIUM PROJECT
(Community Development Director Jeannie Naughton)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 22-XX (Attachment 1) approving Final Parcel Map No. 82983, which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map; and

2. Authorize the City Clerk to endorse the certificate for said map.

Executive Summary:

The applicant and property owner, Nick Lind, at 622 1st Place, possess a Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan, approved at the September 15, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant applied for a final map approval on June 28, 2022. Upon review of Final Parcel Map No. 82983 (Attachment 2), staff recommends Council adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) approving the final map.

Background:

At its September 15, 2020 meeting, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 20-2 and Precise Development Plan 20-5 for a two-unit residential condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82983 located at 622 1st Place.

Past Planning Commission Actions
Meeting Date Description
September 15, 2020
(Regular Meeting)
Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 20-2, Precise Development Plan 20-5, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82983
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™396
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0494
Discussion:

Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the Los Angeles County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4) of the State Subdivision Map Act.

An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval.

Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, “...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder....” pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the State Subdivision Map Act.

Staff reviewed the Final Parcel Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Land Use and Design Element
Goal 1: Create a sustainable urban form and land use patterns that support a robust economy and high quality of life for residents.

Policy:
· 1.6 Scale and context. Consider the compatibility of new development within its urban context to avoid abrupt changes in scale and massing.

Goal 2. Neighborhoods provide for diverse needs of residents of all ages and abilities and are organized to support healthy and active lifestyles.

Policies:
· 2.3 Balanced neighborhoods. Promote a diverse range of housing unit types and sizes, within the allowed densities.
· 2.5 Neighborhood preservation. Preserve and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods by avoiding or abating the intrusion of disruptive, nonconforming buildings and uses.
· 2.6 Diversity of building types and styles. Encourage a diversity of building types and styles in areas designated for multi-family housing ranging from duplex/triplex/fourplex to courtyard housing to multi-family housing projects.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™397
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0494
Goal 5. Quality and authenticity in architecture and site design in all construction and renovation of buildings.

Policy:
· 5.6 Eclectic and diverse architecture. Seek to maintain and enhance neighborhood character through eclectic and diverse architectural styles.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution

2. Final Map No. 82983

3. Letter from the County Engineer

4. Link to September 15, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report Respectfully Submitted by: Johnathon Masi, Assistant Planner Concur: Jeannie Naughton, Community Development Director Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™398

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
RESOLUTION NO. 22-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 82983, FOR TWO NEW DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS, LOCATED AT 622 1ST PLACE IN

THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, on September 15, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application of 622 1st Place, Nick Lind, (the “Applicant” hereinafter) for approval of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82983 and, upon conclusion of said public hearing on September 15, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 20-22 approving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82983.

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2022, the Applicant filed an application for approval of Final Parcel Map No. 82983 (the “Application” hereinafter), as described in the title of this Resolution.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.08.040, the City Engineer has reviewed Final Parcel Map No. 82983 and determined that the map is technically correct, conforms to the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map and is in compliance with applicable provisions of Title 16 of the Municipal Code and of the Subdivision Map Act.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in this Resolution are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 16.08.040 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the Final Parcel Map to be in substantial conformance with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, with Title 7, Division 2, Chapter 3 of the California Government Code and with the applicable provisions 399

of Title 16 of the Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing finding, the Council hereby approves Final Parcel Map No. 80318 as presented.

SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall transmit a copy of this Resolution to the Applicant.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 9th day of August, 2022.

Michael Detoy
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ ________________________________ Myra Maravilla Michael Jenkins
City Clerk City Attorney
400

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
“To Enrich Lives Through Effective and Caring Service”
900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331
Telephone: (626) 458-5100
http://dpw.lacounty.gov
June 1, 2022
MARK PESTRELLA, Director
ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:

P.O. BOX 1460
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460

IN REPLY PLEASE
REFER TO FILE: LD-2
Mr. Lucho Rodriguez
Deputy City Engineer
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3884
Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

PARCEL MAP 82983
Parcel Map 82983 has been reviewed and approved by Public Works for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis, title information, and for compliance with the Subdivision Map Act. It is ready for your examination and certification as to compliance with the conditions of approval and applicable City ordinances.

The City Council or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act and the Subdivision Map Act.

After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the final map should be returned to Los Angeles County Public Works, Land Development Division, for filing with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's office.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Edmond Ghadimi of Public Works, Land Development Division, at (626) 458-4915 or [email protected].

Very truly yours,

MARK PESTRELLA, PE
Director of Public Works

ARTHUR VANDER VIS, PE
Assistant Deputy Director
Land Development Division
EG:kt
P:\LDPUB\SUBMAP\LETTERS\CITY LETTERS - PARCEL MAPS\82983 MAP-CITY LETTER (HERMOSA BEACH).DOC 403
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0466
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022
SUBJECT: FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 82639 (C.U.P. CON 19-5,
PDP NO. 19-8) AND ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT DEDICATION
FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES; LOCATION: 626
LONGFELLOW AVENUE; APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER:

MILTON STREET; RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITIONS REQUEST:

APPROVE FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 82639 FOR A TWO-UNIT

ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT

AND ACCEPT THE EASEMENT DEED FOR A

SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE
REDEVELOPMENT OF 626 LONGFELLOW AVENUE
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
(Community Development Director Jeannie Naughton)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 22-XX (Attachment 1) accepting the easement deed for a sanitary sewer easement in connection with the redevelopment of 626 Longfellow Avenue;

2. Authorize the City Manager to sign the Certificate of Acceptance (Attachment 5);

3. Adopt Resolution 22-XX (Attachment 6) approving Final Parcel Map No. 82639, which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map; and

4. Authorize the City Clerk to endorse the certificate for said map.

Executive Summary:

The applicant, Milton Street Residential Acquisitions, Inc., at 626 Longfellow, possesses a Conditional Use Permit and Precise Development Plan, approved at the October 15, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant applied for final map approval on May 18, 2022. The subject site includes two separate City-owned and maintained eight-inch sanitary sewer mains located on the property line border with no dedicated utility easements. Through the development approval process, staff requested a utility easement dedication to the City. If accepted, the newly dedicated easement would allow for maintenance access to existing City-owned sewer infrastructure as shown on the Location Map (Attachment 2).

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) accepting the dedication of a City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 5 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™404
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0466
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) accepting the dedication of a sanitary sewer easement, authorize the City Manager to sign the Certificate of Acceptance (Attachment 5), and adopt a resolution (Attachment 6) approving the Final Parcel Map No. 82639 (Attachment 7). If approved, both the respective map and easement deed may be recorded concurrently.

Background:

At its October 15, 2019 meeting, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 19-5 and Precise Development Plan 19-8 for a two-unit residential condominium project and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 for 626 Longfellow Avenue. Architectural and Civil Plans were submitted to the Community Development and Public Works Departments for review and approval.

The Public Works Department identified two separate City-owned and maintained eight-inch sanitary sewer mains located on the property line border of subject private property with no dedicated utility easements. Prior to finalizing Parcel Map 82639 (Attachment 7) staff requested the property owner grant a utility easement for access and maintenance to the public sewer system. The property owner granted the utility easements and had a professional land surveyor prepare the attached Easement Agreement and legal description (Attachments 3 and 4).

The Public Works Department reviewed and approved Civil Plans on May 5, 2020 and building permits for the condominium project were issued on January 19, 2021. The project is currently under construction.

Past Planning Commission Actions
Meeting Date Description
October 15, 2019
(Regular Meeting)
Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 19-5, Precise Development Plan 19-8, and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639
Discussion:

Easement Dedication
Much of the City-owned sanitary sewer infrastructure is 75-100 years old and requires regular maintenance, updating, and emergency repairs. To maintain the existing sewer infrastructure, the City requires adequate access and space to perform the repairs or replacement. Designated utility easements on private property allow the City the necessary access to maintain its infrastructure.

Currently, there are several locations where City-owned sanitary sewer infrastructure was previously installed on private property without dedicated utility easements.

As a standard practice, the Public Works Department requests the owner of any new development City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™405
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0466
As a standard practice, the Public Works Department requests the owner of any new development that includes City-owned sewer infrastructure on private property to grant a dedicated utility easement. The standard easement width, where no structures are permitted to be built or obstruct the dedicated easement, is 10 feet.

The development of 626 Longfellow Avenue includes two existing City-owned eight-inch sanitary sewer mains installed on private property. Based on these conditions, staff requested the property owner grant two five-foot utility easements as shown on the Easement Agreement and legal description (Attachments 3 and 4). The reduced easement of five feet is due to the existing sewer main being located within two neighboring properties.

Staff recommends City Council adopt the resolution accepting the Easement Agreement (Attachment 1) and authorize the City Manager to sign Certificate of Acceptance (Attachment 5) prior to recordation of easement documents and Final Parcel Map 82639 (Attachment 7).

Final Map
Once a map has been tentatively approved by the Planning Commission, copies of the tentatively approved map must be submitted to the Los Angeles County Engineer, who is contracted by the City, to review the map for its technical correctness pursuant to Section 66442(a)(4) of the State Subdivision Map Act. An applicant has two years from the date of tentative map approval to submit for final map approval.

Final maps must be submitted to the City Council and must be approved by the City Council, “...if it conforms to all the requirements of [Subdivision Map Act] and any local subdivision ordinance applicable at the time of approval or conditional approval of the tentative map and any rulings made thereunder....” pursuant to Section 66458(a) of the State Subdivision Map Act.

Staff reviewed the Final Parcel Map and found it substantially consistent with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map approved by the Planning Commission and in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Land Use and Design Element
Goal 1: Create a sustainable urban form and land use patterns that support a robust economy and high quality of life for residents.

Policy:
· 1.6 Scale and context. Consider the compatibility of new development within its urban City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™406
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0466
· 1.6 Scale and context. Consider the compatibility of new development within its urban context to avoid abrupt changes in scale and massing.

Goal 2. Neighborhoods provide for diverse needs of residents of all ages and abilities, and are organized to support healthy and active lifestyles.

Policies:
· 2.3 Balanced neighborhoods. Promote a diverse range of housing unit types and sizes, within the allowed densities.
· 2.5 Neighborhood preservation. Preserve and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods by avoiding or abating the intrusion of disruptive, nonconforming buildings and uses.
· 2.6 Diversity of building types and styles. Encourage a diversity of building types and styles in areas designated for multi-family housing ranging from duplex/triplex/fourplex to courtyard housing to multi-family housing projects.

Goal 5. Quality and authenticity in architecture and site design in all construction and renovation of buildings.

Policy:
· 5.6 Eclectic and diverse architecture. Seek to maintain and enhance neighborhood character through eclectic and diverse architectural styles.

Infrastructure Element
Goal 1. Infrastructure systems are functional safe and well maintained.

Policy:
· 1.1 Infrastructure systems plan. Establish and adopt an integrated, holistic systems approach to guide infrastructure development, improvement, maintenance, and resilience.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution for Easement Dedication

2. Easement Location Map

3. Easement Dedication

4. Easement Exhibit A

5. Certificate of Acceptance

6. Draft Resolution for Final Map

7. Final Parcel Map No. 82639
City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™407
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0466

8. Letter from the County Engineer

9. Planning Commission Resolution 19-24

10.Link to October 15, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report Respectfully Submitted by: Melanie Hall, Assistant Planner Respectfully Submitted by: Michelle Licata, Assistant Engineer Concur: Jeannie Naughton, Community Development Director Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™408
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

ACCEPTING THE EASEMENT DEED FOR A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT OF 626 LONGFELLOW AVENUE,

HERMOSA BEACH
The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:

A. RECITALS:
(i.) The owners of the real property located at 626 Longfellow Avenue, Hermosa Beach, CA desire to grant to the City a sanitary sewer easement in connection with the redevelopment of their property. (ii.) The City desires to accept the sanitary sewer easement in furtherance of the public interest.
(iii.) All legal prerequisites to the acceptance of this grant and the adoption of this resolution have occurred.

B. RESOLUTION:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HERMOSA BEACH DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby find that all of the facts set forth in the recitals of this resolution are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby accept the grant of a sanitary sewer easement
legally described in the Easement Deed attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and cause the Easement Deed to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder.
409
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _______, 2022.

Michael Detoy, Mayor
ATTEST:
___
City Clerk
410

0.0 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere

0.0 Miles
Notes
626 Longfellow Ave
Location Map
Legend
The map generated is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map do not have survey grade accuracy but represent close approximation. 0 0.02
1: 1,575
City of Hermosa Beach
City Boundary
Parcels
City Manholes
City Sewerlines
411
Recording Requested by:

City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254
When Recorded Mail to:

Community Development Dept
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, Ca 90254
No charge for recording pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 6103 This is a conveyance of an easement and the consideration and value is $100 or less R&T Code 11911

EASEMENT DEED
For valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, MILTON STREET RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITIONS, INC.,

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
do(es) hereby grant to the CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, a municipal corporation of Los Angeles County, State of California, an easement for, and the right to construct, operate, maintain, repair and use, or to reconstruct, a SANITARY SEWER, across and under that certain real property situated in said City of Hermosa Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and more particularly described as follows:

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT “A”
Together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and along said easement and to deposit tools, implements and other materials thereon, by said City of Hermosa Beach, its officers, agents and employees and by any contractor, his agents and employees, engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes above set forth.

MILTON STREET RESIDENTIAL ACQUISITIONS,
INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Dated this _____ day of _________________ 2022. Sign: ____________________________ (All signatures must be notarized) Print: __Heriberto Gonzalez Title:

Property Address: 626 Longfellow Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
APN: 4169-031-012
412
EXHIBIT “A”
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 75 AND 76 OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW PARK, IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA

BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 18, PAGES 2 AND 3 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE WESTERLY 5.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 75; AND THE SOUTHERLY 5.00 FEET OF SAID LOTS 75 AND 76
413
EXHIBIT “A”
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 75 AND 76 OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

CONVENTION HALL AND MARINE VIEW PARK, IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA

BEACH, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 18, PAGES 2 AND 3 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE WESTERLY 5.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 75; AND THE SOUTHERLY 5.00 FEET OF SAID LOTS 75 AND 76
414

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
Pursuant to Section 27281 of the
California Government Code
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Easement Deed dated________, 2022, from__________, a __________, as Grantor thereunder, to City of Hermosa Beach, a municipal corporation, as Grantee thereunder, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach, pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. _____________, adopted by City Council on August 9, 2022, and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: _________________, 2022 _____________________________ By ____________________________
Suja Lowenthal
City Manager
415

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
RESOLUTION NO. 22-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 82639, FOR TWO NEW DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS, LOCATED AT 626

LONGFELLOW AVENUE IN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,

CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Hermosa Beach conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application of 626 Longfellow Avenue, Milton Street Residential Acquisitions, (the “Applicant” hereinafter) for approval of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639 and, upon conclusion of said public hearing on October 15, 2019, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 19-24 approving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82639.

WHEREAS, on May 18, 2022, the Applicant filed an application for approval of Final Parcel Map No. 82639 (the “Application” hereinafter), as described in the title of this Resolution.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.08.040, the City Engineer has reviewed Final Parcel Map No. 82639 and determined that the map is technically correct, conforms to the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map and is in compliance with applicable provisions of Title 16 of the Municipal Code and of the Subdivision Map Act.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in this Resolution are true and correct.
416

SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 16.08.040 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the City Council finds the Final Parcel Map to be in substantial conformance with the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, with Title 7, Division 2, Chapter 3 of the California Government Code and with the applicable provisions of Title 16 of the Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing finding, the Council hereby approves Final Parcel Map No. 82639 as presented.

SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted; and shall transmit a copy of this Resolution to the Applicant.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 9th day of August, 2022.

Michael Detoy
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ ________________________________ Myra Maravilla Michael Jenkins
City Clerk City Attorney
417
418
5,288 SQ.FT.
419

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
“To Enrich Lives Through Effective and Caring Service”
900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331
Telephone: (626) 458-5100
http://dpw.lacounty.gov
April 21, 2022
MARK PESTRELLA, Director
ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:

P.O. BOX 1460
ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460

IN REPLY PLEASE
REFER TO FILE: LD-2
Mr. Lucho Rodriguez
Deputy City Engineer
City of Hermosa Beach
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254-3884
Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

PARCEL MAP 82639
Parcel Map 82639 has been reviewed and approved by Public Works for mathematical accuracy, survey analysis, title information, and for compliance with the Subdivision Map Act. It is ready for your examination and certification as to compliance with the conditions of approval and applicable City ordinances.

The City Council or Advisory Agency should make the findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act and the Subdivision Map Act.

After your approval and the approval of the City Council or Advisory Agency, the final map should be returned to Los Angeles County Public Works, Land Development Division, for filing with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's office.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Diego Rivera of Public Works, Land Development Division, at (626) 458-4915 or [email protected].

Very truly yours,

MARK PESTRELLA, PE
Director of Public Works

ARTHUR VANDER VIS, PE
Assistant Deputy Director
Land Development Division
DR:kt
P:\LDPUB\SUBMAP\LETTERS\CITY LETTERS - PARCEL MAPS\82639 MAP-CITY LETTER (HERMOSA BEACH).DOC 420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0484
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022

VACANCIES-PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION

UPCOMING EXPIRATION OF TERMS
(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council direct staff to immediately advertise and request applications from interested parties for two Public Works Commission Members for four-year terms ending October 31, 2026.

Executive Summary:

Incumbent Public Works Commission Members, Andrea Giancoli and Kathy Dunbabin have terms that are set to expire on October 31, 2022. Staff requests Council direction to begin the application process to fill the two positions for the new term beginning on November 1, 2022.

Background:

In accordance with Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2.80, the Public Works Commission shall consist of five members appointed by the City Council for staggered four-year terms. Members of the Public Works Commission shall be qualified electors of the City to be considered for a position on the commission.

Key duties of the Public Works Commission are to review and make a recommendation to the City Council on all capital improvement program projects, assist with developing and updating design guidelines for public improvements, and other matters referred to the Commission by the City Council, as outlined in Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 2.80.

The Public Works Commission meets regularly in the Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. on the third Wednesday of odd-numbered months (January, March, May, July, September, and November).

However, the Commission is currently meeting at 6:00 p.m., in alignment with the City Council, and is meeting in a hybrid format to give members of the public and the Commission the option to join a meeting via Zoom or in-person.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™432
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0484
Discussion:

Following established procedures, staff requests City Council direction to advertise for two Public Works Commission positions set to expire and be vacated on October 31, 2022. If so directed, the City Clerk would prepare a notice for physical posting and publication in the Easy Reader on Thursday, August 18, 2022.

Based on the advertising date, staff would set an application filing deadline of 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 21, 2022. A staff report presenting applications from interested parties would be presented at the September 27, 2022, City Council meeting, with interviews being scheduled before the October 11, 2022 City Council meeting. Appointments can be made by the City Council at the same October 11, 2022 meeting. New appointments to the Public Works Commission would be for four-year terms expiring on October 31, 2026.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Governance Element
Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.

Policies:
· 1.1 Open meetings. Maintain the community’s trust by holding meetings in which decisions are being made, that are open and available for all community members to attend, participate, or view remotely.
· 1.4 Consensus oriented. Strive to utilize a consensus-oriented decision making process. · 1.7 Diversity of representation. Strive to reflect a comprehensive cross-section of the community in appointments to Commission and Advisory Committees.

Goal 2. The community is active and engaged in decision-making process.

Policies:
· 2.3 Public participation guidelines. Establish parameters and guidelines to ensure public participation is promoted through diverse methods.
· 2.6 Responsive to community needs. Continue to be responsive to community inquiries, providing public information and recording feedback from community interactions.

Fiscal Impact:

The estimated cost of one publication in the Easy Reader would be $200. Funds are available in the City Clerk’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™433
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0484
Attachments:

Link to Boards and Commissions Application
Respectfully Submitted by: Myra Maravilla, City Clerk
Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™434
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0500
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022

SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

QUARTERLY SUMMARY
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Quarterly Summary from the South Bay Workforce Investment Board (SBWIB).

Attachments:

SBWIB 4th Quarter Summary for Program Year 2021-2022
Respectfully Submitted by: Chris Cagle, SBWIB Regional Affairs Manager Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/25/2024
powered by Legistar™435

SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD
11539 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 500, Hawthorne, CA 90250
Office 310-970-7700; Fax 310-970-7712
Quarterly Summary of the
July 21, 2022 South Bay Workforce Investment Board of Directors Meeting
Hermosa Beach
This report summarizes the July 21, 2022, South Bay Workforce Investment Board’s (SBWIB) meeting activities and program accomplishments during the 4th Quarter of Program Year 2021-2022. As you are aware, the South Bay WIB is comprised of representatives from the eleven participating cities of Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach Lawndale, El Segundo, Inglewood, Carson, Redondo Beach, Torrance, Hawthorne, Lomita and Gardena for the delivery of employment and training services through its One-Stop Business and Career Centers. *The South Bay Workforce Investment Board’s 27th Annual Awards Ceremony will be held on Thursday, November 3, 2022, at the Torrance Marriott South Bay. The reception will begin at 5:00 p.m. followed by the dinner program which will begin at 6:00 p.m. The Awards Ceremony will celebrate the outstanding accomplishments of the workforce development community during the past year and honor, employers, training providers and graduates of job and career training programs.
*Last quarter, the California Department of Industrial Relations awarded the SBWIB a $2 million grant to implement the SBWIB’s Expanding Flexible Apprenticeship in California (EFAC) initiative that will train underserved individuals to fill high demand positions in a variety of industry sectors throughout the State including energy, information technology, arts, media & entertainment, advanced manufacturing and healthcare. Over a threeyear period, the SBWIB will enroll 417 participants from underserved communities, including women, people of color, justice-involved persons, individuals with disabilities, veterans and youth into non-traditional registered apprenticeships.
*As part of the continued partnership with Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 2, the SBWIB received a grant for $206,000 to provide life sciences pre-apprenticeships, career exploration, and training to at least 75 Second District high school seniors. The Second Supervisorial 436
District has prioritized recruiting from eight high schools across the District.

The program will be offered in the Fall of 2022 and the Spring of 2023. *Last quarter, the South Bay WIB was awarded a $250,000 grant to provide work readiness services to fifty (50) students with disabilities 16 – 22 years of age. The grant funding will be used to provide one hundred (100) additional paid work experience hours to students with disabilities in an effort to enhance their skills. Students will be interning with local non-profits, community-based organizations, and for-profit businesses. *During the 4th quarter, two cohorts began the Aero-Flex PreApprenticeship Program, one cohort included ten (10) El Camino College students. As part of the three-track program, the participants are completing the Blueprint for Workplace Success curriculum, receiving resume and interview assistance, and completing technical skills training through Tooling U-SME. The El Camino College students are completing their work experience at Northrop Grumman.
*Last quarter, nine (9) women were enrolled in an advanced manufacturing pre-apprenticeship program through the $250,000 James Irvine Foundation grant. The South Bay WIB was awarded the James Irvine Foundation grant to expand career pathways for women and women of color with a focus on the advanced manufacturing sector. Over a two-year period, the SBWIB is tasked with identifying and training at least 50 lowincome women, women of color, and/or others with multiple barriers to enter the advanced manufacturing sector with a focus on aerospace and bioscience. As a result, employers will have access to a pipeline of diverse and skilled job seekers.
*America's Job Center of California (AJCC)/One-Stop Services – The SBWIB operates four One-Stop Business & Career Service Centers located in Inglewood, Torrance, Gardena and Carson. For the safety of the public and to reduce the number of people in close proximity, the One-Stop Centers continue to offer services virtually or in-person and highly recommend scheduling an appointment for services. Each South Bay OneStop Business & Career Center continues to assist about 25-30 laid-off workers daily with applying for unemployment insurance benefits.

Recruitments, workshops, orientation/info sessions, case management, and career pathway counseling are provided virtually or in-person. Clients are being assisted with crossing over in their short-term vocational training programs from the traditional seat-based instruction to distance learning 437
platforms. The Job Development team conducts recruitment fairs in-person or virtually and will continue to screen and refer applicants to essential service employers that are in desperate need of employees. *Last quarter, 6 participants successfully completed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Program and two successfully exited the Workforce Accelerator Special grant with employment. The remaining 4 participants are interviewing with local hospitals such as the LAC+USC Medical Center that is actively looking to fill 100+ positions. The SBWIB will continue to host targeted recruitment fairs and application workshops for graduating CNA cohorts in conjunction with the Los Angeles County Nursing Administrator to assist with filling open positions.
*Rapid Response services were provided to 16 South Bay companies that employ 655 individuals who were affected by layoffs/closures during the 4th Quarter of Program Year 2021-2022, including Paramount Building Services located in the City of Hermosa Beach. The SBWIB’s Rapid Response team reached out to the employers and offered to provide webinars to assist with the layoffs. The webinars covered services offered at the America’s Job Centers of California, unemployment insurance, healthcare options, and financial services. The Rapid Response team will continue to provide webinars and virtual assistance to employers and dislocated workers.
*The South Bay Business and Career Center enrolled 3 additional Hermosa Beach residents in the WIOA (Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act) dislocated worker program during the 4th quarter.
*One additional Hermosa Beach resident was enrolled in the WIOA adult program last quarter. A total of 18 Hermosa Beach residents were enrolled in the WIOA adult program during the 2021 – 2022 Program Year. *In the last quarter, 2 Hermosa Beach resident exited the dislocated worker program with employment.
*Two additional youth from the City of Hermosa Beach was enrolled in the WIOA year-round Youth Program last quarter; these individuals received pre-employment Blueprint for Workplace Success training and access to free occupational training based on their career interest. Other services included paid work experience at a worksite in the City of Hermosa Beach. 438
*It is the goal of South Bay WIB to provide essential online services to support students, teachers, and parents by assisting them navigate through virtual platforms and school assignments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

SBWIB has taken a number of steps to ensure that youth have access to the resources they need to prosper amid a pandemic. We strive to assist our local K-12 partners with virtual services through our Virtual Learning Ambassadors Program. Virtual Learning Ambassadors (VLAs) are paid high school students who support elementary/middle/high school students, teachers, and parents who need assistance adapting to a virtual presence.

VLAs are paid student interns from ages 16-24. VLA’s will receive 20 hours of paid training and up to $1500 of paid work experience. The VLA’s will be trained on several online platforms such as Google Classroom, Canvas, Schoology, Edgenuity, Google Meets, Acellus Learning Accelerator, Zoom, etc. online or in-person at either the Hawthorne Teen Center, the Inglewood Teen Center, or the SBWIB YouthBuild site before delivering a minimum of 120 hours of virtual services to students, parents and teachers. *Last quarter, the SBWIB enrolled 25 additional individuals in the statewide National Dislocated Worker Employment Recovery grant (NDWG) making the total number enrolled 227. Under this program, displaced workers are provided with job training and placement services. California Employment Development Department (EDD) awarded the South Bay WIB the NDWG Employment Recovery grant to assist workers displaced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. So far, 114 out of 133 participants exited the program with employment.
*The SBWIB is part of a two-year Allied Health Regional Project with West Los Angeles College and 12 other community colleges to do sector-based work in allied health with a goal of increasing enrollments, completions, and living wage attainments for community college students. The group meets once a month to discuss training on a regional level in an effort to meet local workforce needs. As the convener, the South Bay WIB initiates the monthly virtual meetings comprised of representatives from the community colleges, industry partners, and associations to explore collaboration opportunities. Last quarter, various employers participated in the virtual meetings including Cedar Sinai and Prime Healthcare.
*The 4th quarter totals reflected that a total of 167 individuals from 17 South Bay employers have been enrolled to receive upskills training through the $590,780 California Employment Training Panel grant. Under the grant, manufacturing, information technology, logistics and healthcare sector 439
employers are reimbursed for new and incumbent worker upskill training.

The SBWIB analyzes and manages the employer’s workforce training needs and connects participating employers with appropriate training providers to deliver services if needed.
*On June 23rd, a Graduation Ceremony was held for 11 SBWIB YouthBuild graduates who successfully completed the program and obtained their high school diplomas. Applications are currently being accepted for enrollment into the SBWIB’s YouthBuild career pathway program. The program is open to at-risk out-of-school youth ages 16-24. The SBWIB’s YouthBuild program provides a seamless progression from education to work-based training that includes classroom instruction leading to a high school diploma and occupational skills training in construction building trades at approved work sites. YouthBuild Charter School of California provides the academic skills curriculum and Habitat for Humanity manages the housing construction or rehabilitation project sites. Please contact the SBWIB YouthBuild site at (310) 225-3060 for additional information. *Last quarter, the South Bay WIB and the Hospital Association of Southern California hosted a Clinical Laboratory Science (CLS) orientation for California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) students. As a result, 11 CSUDH students were recruited for enrollment under the Workforce Accelerator Fund. The CSUDH students will receive clinical laboratory science training and supportive services to prepare for the credentialing exam.
*This past quarter, the Los Angeles Basin Regional Planning Unit (LABRPU) successfully completed the State of California’s Prison to Employment (P2E) Program. The South Bay Workforce Investment Board serves as the lead and fiscal agent under the (P2E) initiative on behalf of the seven Workforce Development Boards in Los Angeles County apart of the LABRPU. The LABRPU exceeded the goal of providing employment and job placement services to over 700 formerly incarcerated individuals.

Over 1,930 individuals have received direct services and 1,035 individuals have completed the program with unsubsidized employment. *During the 4th quarter, the SBWIB exceeded all service goals under the El Camino College Career Pathways Grant. Under the Grant, SBWIB staff provided job readiness workshops, work experience opportunities, and other employment services. Over the course of the past school year, SBWIB staff provided 450 one-on-one sessions with students, conducted 440
11 workshops, hosted 2 large hiring events, provided 219 job leads, and assisted 27 students with securing employment or internships. *Our year-end totals reflect 65,527 individuals received services through our South Bay One-Stop Business and Career Centers, 13,542 of which were serviced through the Torrance One-Stop, where Hermosa Beach residents and businesses are served.

*The South Bay One-Stop Business & Career Center will continuously conduct monthly outreach to Hermosa Beach businesses to market SBWIB services available to meet their hiring and business needs. *During the last quarter, the SBWIB in partnership with the SELACO Workforce Development Board, and Health Impact successfully met the enrollment goals under the Specialty Nursing Apprenticeship Program. A cohort of 15 Registered Nurses were enrolled in the Program. Under this Apprenticeship Program, incumbent workers including experienced registered nurses and recent nursing graduates have the opportunity to join a unique 12-month transition to practice program. Upon completion of the Program, the graduates will transition into an ambulatory care position.

A written summary, along with a report of Program Year 2021-2022’s 4th quarter activities and accomplishments is being provided for your personal review.

Thank you,
Jan Vogel
SBWIB Executive Director
441
1 | P a ge
Committees Activity Report
(Based upon the April 21, 2022, South Bay Workforce Investment Board Meeting) *Rapid Response Summary of Activity from July 2021 – March 2022:

Number of Companies
Affected
Number of Employees
Affected
Number of companies
utilizing services
Number of companies
not receiving service
16 655 16 0
City Number of
Companies Affected
Number of Employees
Affected
Carson 2 70
El Segundo 2 120
Gardena 1 8
Gardena (Unincorporated) 1 5
Hawthorne 1 45
Hermosa Beach 1 6
Inglewood 0 0
Lawndale 0 0
Lomita 0 0
Los Angeles 0 0
Manhattan Beach 1 6
Redondo Beach 1 21
Torrance 5 207
Torrance (Unincorporated 1 167
Youth Development Council (YDC) Committee Meeting, May 3, 2022:

The May 3, 2022, Youth Development Council meeting was called to order at 9:02 a.m. The following information was discussed or acted upon:

The Committee took action to approve the February 1, 2022, Meeting Minutes and the Youth Activity and Performance Report.

Members of the South Bay Workforce Investment Board’s (SBWIB) Special Projects Development Department provided the Committee with a presentation on the Meta/Facebook Career Connections Program. The Committee was informed that the SBWIB has partnered with Meta/Facebook under their Career Connections Program to provide Digital Marketing internships to young adults, 18 years of age or older. Under the Program, the interns assist businesses with amplifying their online presence, at no cost to the businesses, once 5 weeks of non-paid training has been completed. Interns are paid by the SBWIB for 160 hours of paid work experience once they complete preliminary training and are assigned to a South Bay business. The Special Projects Development Department concluded the presentation by encouraging interested young adults and businesses to submit an interest form and noted that the Program is expected to kickoff June 2, 2022.

During the meeting, SBWIB staff members provided updates on activities conducted at the Hawthorne and Inglewood Teen Centers, both Bridge to Work Programs, the YouthBuild Program, the Youth at Work Summer Program, the Virtual Learning Ambassadors Program, and Special Youth Projects and Grants.

Presidents, Superintendents and Representatives from CSU, Dominguez Hills, the Southern California Regional 442
2 | P a ge
Occupational Center, Da Vinci Schools, Lawndale, Hawthorne, Centinela Valley, Lennox, LAUSD Local District South, and Wiseburn school districts provided the Committee with brief updates on things happening in their districts.

The meeting was adjourned at 10:02 a.m.

One Stop Policy Committee Meeting, May 18, 2022:

The May 18, 2022, One Stop Policy Committee meeting was called to order at 9:01 a.m. The following items were discussed or acted upon.

The February 16, 2022, meeting minutes and the 3rd Quarter Summary for Classroom Training Providers Activity reports were approved.

The 4th Quarter Self-Service Activity Report through April 30, 2022 was presented by Mr. Robert Chavez and approved unanimously by the Committee.

Mr. Michael Trogan provided a brief update on disability services offered by the South Bay Workforce Investment Board in partnership with community partners including the Department of Rehabilitation (DOR).

During the meeting, the Committee was provided with an update on the Program Year 2022 – 2025 South Bay One-Stop America's Job Center of California (AJCC) Partner’s Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) and Infrastructure Agreements. Under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) each local Workforce Development Board is to develop a MOU with all AJCC required partners to establish a high quality One-Stop delivery system and enhance collaboration amongst partner programs. The Committee was informed that all signed AJCC Partner MOUs will be submitted to the State by the June 30th deadline and will include details of when the SBWIB anticipates submitting the remaining MOUs.

Mr. David Baquerizo, SBWIB One-Stop Operator provided a brief report on his role as the Operator and the Comprehensive One-Stop partner meetings.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 a.m.

Performance & Evaluation Committee Meeting, May 17, 2022:

TheMay 17, 2022,Performance&EvaluationCommitteemeetingwas called to order at 9:00 a.m. The following items were discussed or acted upon:

The February 15, 2022,meetingminutes were reviewed and approved by the Committee.

TheWIOAFY2021-223rd quarterexpenditurereportthroughMarch 31, 2022, was approved unanimously, as well as the Self-Service and Activity report through April 30, 2022.

StaffmemberJustinaMunozpresentedthe3rd QuarterOne-StopCentersand Service ProvidersReport. The report displayed that during the third quarter all South Bay One-Stop Business and Career Centers and Service Providers met 85% or more of their enrollment, exit and wage goals for the year. After reviewand discussion, theCommitteeunanimously approved the 3rd Quarter Service Provider and Operating Cities Report.

Ms. LauraBischoff presented the 3rd QuarterVendorPerformanceReport.Staff recommendations were to place 5 training providers on probation and to place 9 training courses on hold. Ms. Bischoff informed the Committee 443
3 | P a ge
that South Bay Workforce Investment Board (SBWIB) staff will send letters of concern to the training providers allowing them an opportunity to work out any discrepancies before action is taken. The providers placed on hold will not receive any more referrals until their placement numbers have improved. After discussion, the 3rd Quarter Vendor Performance Report for classroom training providers was approved unanimously by the Committee.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:39 a.m.

Business & Economic Development Committee Meeting, July 6, 2022:

The July 6, 2022, Business, Technology and Economic Development Committee meeting was called to order at 9:01 a.m.

The Committee reviewed and approved the April 6, 2022, Meeting Minutes.

Staff member Maria Frias presented the PY 21-22 4th quarter Rapid Response Activity Report. 16 companies received Rapid Response services through Jun 30, 2022, with a total of 655 employees affected by layoffs/closures. After review and discussion, the Rapid Response Activity Report was approved unanimously by the Committee.

The latest Construction and Utilities Preparation Program (CUPP) report was reviewed by the Committee and reflected that a total of 206 individuals were enrolled in an apprenticeship program and placed with various Intuit Dome construction companies. 200 of the apprenticeship placements were minorities.

Mr. Michael Trogan provided a brief update on the SBWIB’s healthcare initiatives including the dental assistant training program and the apprenticeship program in the areas of specialty nursing, certified nursing assistant, phlebotomy and clinical laboratory science.

During the meeting, Ms. Chris Cagle also provided the Committee with updates on Pre-Apprenticeship and Apprenticeship Programs, Employment Training Panel (ETP) funding, other special projects, and new funding opportunities.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:27 a.m.

Executive Committee Meetings:

The following are highlights of the May 12, 2022, June 9, 2022, June 30, 2022, and July 14, 2022, Executive Committee Meetings:

The Executive Committee approved all committee reports and meeting minutes this past quarter.

On June 30, 2022, the Executive Committee held a Special meeting to discuss the South Bay WIB adopting the Los Angeles County or Los Angeles City minimum wage for all Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act paid work experience/work-based programs, including County programs such as Youth@Work. Effective July 1, 2022, the County of Los Angeles’ minimum wage increased to $15.96 an hour and the City of Los Angeles’ minimum wage increased to $16.04 an hour. After review and discussion, the Executive Committee unanimously approved adopting the City of Los Angeles’ minimum wage ordinance and the SBWIB Procedural Memo.
444
4 | P a ge
During the July 14, 2022 meeting, the Executive Committee approved the SBWIB July 21, 2022, Meeting Agenda.

This concludes the Executive Committee Report.
445

SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD
PY 2021-2022

NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS SERVED - INFORMATIONAL/SELF SERVICE ONLY

PREVIOUS CUMULATIVE PREVIOUS MONTH OF CUMULATIVE
REPORT MONTH JUNE PY 21/22
INGLEWOOD, HAWTHORNE, LAWNDALE, 28186 3705 3686 31872

EL SEGUNDO ONE-STOP BUSINESS

AND CAREER CENTER
GARDENA ONE-STOP 12316 1221 1432 13748

BUSINESS AND CAREER CENTER
TORRANCE ONE-STOP 12144 1219 1398 13542

BUSINESS AND CAREER CENTER
CARSON BUSINESS AND 5219 783 1146 6365

CAREER CENTER
TOTAL 57865 6928 7662 65527
7/11/2022 Self Serve PY21/22:excel
446

SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT (NEW ENROLLMENT REPORT) GRANT PERIOD 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 SUMMARY BY CAREER CENTER REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 PAGE 2
ADULT PROGRAM (G201)
Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q SBWIB Qtr. % Year-End % ∆Q Gardena Plan Plan Plan Plan Inglewood Plan Plan Plan Plan Torrance Plan Plan Plan Plan Carson Plan Plan Plan Plan TOTAL Plan Plan Plan Plan I. TOTAL CLIENTS 49 47 104% 47 104% 177 178 99% 178 99% 123 123 100% 123 100% 48 47 102% 47 102% 397 395 101% 395 101% A. CARRIED IN 18 18 18 39 39 39 47 47 47 7 7 7 111 111 111 B. NEW 31 29 107% 29 107% 0 138 139 99% 139 99% 24 76 76 100% 76 100% 17 41 40 103% 40 103% 11 286 284 101% 284 101% 52 II. TOTAL EXITS 26 #DIV/0! 119 54 220% 54 4 1350% 42 27 156% 241 85 284% 241 A. UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 24 13 185% 5 89 44 202% 32 43 3 1433% 9 34 21 162% 7 190 81 235% 190 53 B. ALSO ATTAINED CREDENTIAL 9 13 69% 2 45 44 102% 16 22 3 733% 3 10 21 48% 2 86 81 106% 0 23 C. % OF PLACEMENT 92% 75% 80% 81% 79%
D. AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $17.71 $20.56 $25.32 $21.19 $21.20 Grant (201)
YOUTH PROGRAM (G301)
Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q SBWIB Qtr. % Year-End % ∆Q Gardena Plan Plan Plan Plan Inglewood Plan Plan Plan Plan Torrance Plan Plan Plan Plan Carson Plan Plan Plan Plan TOTAL Plan Plan Plan Plan I. TOTAL CLIENTS 32 29 110% 29 110% 114 111 103% 111 103% 78 78 100% 78 100% 28 28 100% 28 100% 252 246 102% 246 102% A. CARRIED IN 12 12 12 24 24 24 32 32 32 2 2 2 70 70 70 B. NEW ENROLLEES 20 17 118% 17 118% 0 90 87 103% 87 103% 28 46 46 100% 46 100% 4 26 26 100% 26 100% 5 182 176 103% 176 103% 37 II. TOTAL EXITS 26 14 186% 43 121 36% 64 6 1067% 25 27 93% 158 168 94% 158 A. UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 21 1 29 5 24 9 10 4 84 19
B. ENT. TRAINING/POST-SECONDARY 3 0 10 4 22 1 11 7 46 12 C. ATTAINED RECOGNIZED DEGREE 9 0 17 3 4 8 10 9 40 20
D. AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $16.16 $17.59 $16.57 $16.45 $16.69 YOUTH POSITIVE EXIT RATE 92% 91% 72% 84% 82%
Grant (301)
DISLOCATED WORKER (G501)
Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q Qtr. % Yr. % ∆Q SBWIB Qtr. % Year-End % ∆Q Gardena Plan Plan Plan Plan Inglewood Plan Plan Plan Plan Torrance Plan Plan Plan Plan Carson Plan Plan Plan Plan TOTAL Plan Plan Plan Plan I. TOTAL CLIENTS 42 42 100% 42 100% 151 155 97% 155 97% 244 239 102% 239 102% 67 64 105% 64 105% 504 500 101% 500 101% A. CARRIED IN 20 20 20 64 64 64 153 153 153 30 30 30 267 267 267 B. NEW 22 22 100% 22 100% 0 87 91 96% 91 96% 19 91 86 106% 86 106% 27 37 34 109% 34 109% 12 237 233 102% 233 102% 58 II. TOTAL EXITS 17 11 155% 84 97 87% 122 35 349% 45 69 65% 4% 268 212 126% 268 III. TOTAL UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 15 9 167% 1 67 82 82% 31 92 29 24 32 58 55% 9 206 178 116% 205 65 A. RETRAINING 9 0 38 22 46 7 17 4 110 33
ALSO ATTAINED CREDENTIAL 9 0 38 22 46 7 17 4 110 33
B. CALLED BACK WITH EMPLOYER 0 0 0 0 0
IV. % PLACEMENT (INCL. CALL BACKS) 88% 80% 75% 71% 77%
V. % PLACEMENT (EXCL. CALL BACKS) 88% 80% 75% 71% 77%
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $21.35 $21.86 $35.31 $22.17 $25.17 Grant (501)
Serving laid of workers; with priority given to those individuals that have been laid-off from employers located in the nine cities that comprise the South Bay Workforce Investment Area.

Serving economically disadvantaged adults 18 years and over in the nine cities that comprise the South Bay Workforce Investment Area.

Serving low income, in school and out of school youth between the ages of 14 and no more than 21 years of age in the nine cities that comprise the South Bay Workforce Investment Area. 447

SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT (NEW ENROLLMENT REPORT) GRANT PERIOD 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DETAIL BY CITY
REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 PAGE 3
ADULT PROGRAM (G201)
Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year TOTAL Year Gardena Plan ∆Q Inglewood Plan ∆Q Hawthorne Plan ∆Q Lawndale Plan ∆Q El Segundo Plan ∆QRedondo Plan ∆QHermosa Plan ∆QManhattan Plan ∆QTorrance Plan ∆Q Lomita Plan ∆QCarson Plan ∆Q SBWIB Plan ∆Q I. TOTAL CLIENTS 49 47 96 93 54 57 19 20 8 8 34 35 4 5 6 6 70 68 9 9 48 47 397 395 A. CARRIED IN 18 18 27 27 10 10 2 2 0 0 16 16 1 1 0 0 25 25 5 5 7 7 111 111 B. NEW 31 29 0 69 66 11 44 47 8 17 18 5 8 8 0 18 19 3 3 4 2 6 6 2 45 43 10 4 4 0 41 40 11 286 284 52 II. TOTAL EXITS 26 26 78 78 34 34 5 5 2 2 12 12 2 2 1 1 33 33 6 6 42 42 241 241 A. UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 24 24 5 56 56 17 27 27 14 4 4 1 2 2 0 11 11 3 2 2 0 1 1 1 27 27 5 2 2 0 34 34 7 190 190 53 ALSO ATTAINED CREDENTIAL 9 2 34 8 10 7 1 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 17 2 1 0 10 2 86 23 B. OTHER TERMINATION 2 1 22 10 7 7 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 4 0 8 1 51 22

17.71 18.56 18.09 18.56 27.03 22.6 17 25 19.66 17 21.19 222.4 YOUTH PROGRAM (G301)
Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year TOTAL Year Gardena Plan ∆Q Inglewood Plan ∆Q Hawthorne Plan ∆Q Lawndale Plan ∆Q El Segundo Plan ∆QRedondo Plan ∆QHermosa Plan ∆QManhattan Plan ∆QTorrance Plan ∆Q Lomita Plan ∆QCarson Plan ∆Q SBWIB Plan ∆Q I. TOTAL CLIENTS 32 29 66 64 33 32 11 10 4 5 19 19 4 4 5 5 46 46 4 4 28 28 252 246 A. CARRIED IN 12 12 23 23 1 1 0 0 0 0 7 7 2 2 2 2 19 19 2 2 2 2 70 70 B. NEW 20 17 0 43 41 5 32 31 16 11 10 4 4 5 3 12 12 4 2 2 0 3 3 0 27 27 0 2 2 0 26 26 5 182 176 37 II. TOTAL EXITS 26 26 35 35 5 5 2 2 1 1 17 17 2 2 5 5 36 36 4 4 25 25 158 158 A. UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 21 1 21 3 5 2 2 0 1 0 7 2 0 2 3 1 13 4 1 0 10 4 84 19 ALSO ATTAINED CREDENTIAL 12 0 11 1 4 2 1 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 10 7 1 1 10 9 57 20 B. ENT. TRAINING/POST-SECONDAR 4 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 14 0 1 1 11 7 47 12 C. ATTAINED RECOGNIZED DEGREE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
D. RETURNED TO SCHOOL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E. OTHER EXITS 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 1 0 9 6 2 1 4 3 27 11

16.16 16.25 16.1 21.00 17 17.5 15.67 17.12 16.00 16.45 169.25 DISLOCATED WORKER (G501)
Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year TOTAL Year Gardena Plan ∆Q Inglewood Plan ∆Q Hawthorne Plan ∆Q Lawndale Plan ∆Q El Segundo Plan ∆QRedondo Plan ∆QHermosa Plan ∆QManhattan Plan ∆QTorrance Plan ∆Q Lomita Plan ∆QCarson Plan ∆Q SBWIB Plan ∆Q I. TOTAL CLIENTS 42 42 81 87 41 39 17 17 12 12 68 67 18 18 27 27 112 109 19 18 67 64 504 500 A. CARRY IN 20 20 44 44 8 8 7 7 5 5 43 43 11 11 18 18 70 70 11 11 30 30 267 267 B. NEW 22 22 0 37 43 6 33 31 11 10 10 2 7 7 0 25 24 8 7 7 3 9 9 6 42 39 10 8 7 0 37 34 12 237 233 58 II. TOTAL EXITS 17 17 56 56 13 13 10 10 5 5 32 32 13 13 14 14 49 49 14 14 45 45 268 268 III. TOTAL UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMEN 15 15 1 41 41 15 12 12 7 9 9 6 5 4 3 27 27 8 10 10 2 12 12 4 33 33 7 10 10 3 32 32 9 206 205 65 A. RETRAINING 9 0 26 13 7 5 1 1 4 3 11 3 6 0 9 0 16 3 4 1 17 4 110 33 ALSO ATTAINED CREDENTIAL 9 0 26 13 7 5 1 1 4 3 11 3 6 0 9 0 16 3 4 1 17 4 110 33 B. CALLED BACK WITH EMPLOYER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IV. ALL OTHER TERMINATIONS 2 0 15 8 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 1 3 1 2 0 16 4 4 1 13 3 62 21 448
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 WTW SUBSIDIZED TRANSITIONAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (STEP 100L) - PAID WEX REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DETAIL BY CAREER CENTER PAGE 4 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 4 21 34 26 8 0 0 0 15 26 19 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 4 0 21 3 34 3 26 2 8 2 0 0 0 15 0 26 1 19 3 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 25 20 0 7 5 0 16 18 0 29 54 22
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 25 3 20 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 0 0 16 1 18 0 0 0 29 2 54 6 22 0 II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 9 18 15 42 13 8 37 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 9 2 18 0 15 0 42 2 13 0 8 2 37 2 0 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 16 19 0 0 0 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 16 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ENROLLMENT GOALS 585 ∆ 85 ∆ 76 ∆ 41 ∆ 616 ∆ 95 ∆ 189 563 ∆ ∆ ∆Q I. TOTAL CLIENTS 93 26 19 0 196 15 0 142
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 93 10 26 1 19 3 0 0 196 12 15 0 35 0 142 8 34 117 II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Targets Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, TANF participants; and places them into Paid Work Experience activity. Participants are placed at worksites that are either Public or Non-Profit in an effort to obtain unsubsidized employment and long term self-sufficiency.

Targets CalWORKs participants; and places them into Paid Work Experience and On-the-Job activities in an effort to obtain unsubsidized employment and long term self-sufficiency.

P
R
O
V
I
D
E
R
T
O
T
A
L
S
L
A
C
I
T
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
G
A
T
E
W
A
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S

PAGE TOTALS
2250
526
S
B
W
I
B
T
O
T
A
L
S
F
O
O
T
H
I
L
L
T
O
T
A
L
S
S
E
L
A
C
O
V
E
R
D
U
G
O
T
O
T
A
L
S
L
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S
INTERNATIONAL INST. OF LA

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS

ANGELES

CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW

CENTRAL SGV

RESCARE BOYLE HEIGHTS

YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE

UNION STATION HOMELESS

SERVICES

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS

ANGELES (AYE)

GAIN / CENTRAL COUNTY

HOLLYWOOD WORKSOURCE
CTR

CANOGA PARK WEST HILLS

JVS MARINA/CULVER CITY

EL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO

WILSHIRE METRO

WORKSOURCE CENTER

HOUSING AUTHORITY
PACE
LAI Southeast La Crenshaw
Wrks

CCD RANCHO DOMINGUEZ

CENTRAL SAN GABRIEL

VALLEY GOODWILL

GOODWILL / PACOIMA

MCS ROSEMEAD

LAO / MCS SAN GABRIEL
VALLEY

MCS POMONA

SASSFA / PARAMOUNT

SELA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES

JVS PALMDALE

JVS PACOIMA

JVS CPC ANTELOPE VALLEYHUB CITITES CONSORTIUM

VERDUGO JOB CENTER

GARDENA

INGLEWOOD

INGLEWOOD (POMONA)
CARSON

TORRANCE CAREER CENTER

PACIFIC GATEWAY

FOOTHILL
SELACO

PERCENT

OF PLAN
23%

PLANNED

ENROLLMENT
2,250
449
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 WTW SUBSIDIZED TRANSITIONAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (STEP 100K) - OJT REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DETAIL BY CAREER CENTER PAGE 5 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 10 40 0 2 13 2 0 0 2 0 8 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 10 0 40 3 0 0 2 0 13 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 8 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 1 0 0 3 7 1 1 0 0 5 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 7 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 0 1 0 0 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ENROLLMENT GOALS 65 ∆ 10 ∆ 9 ∆ 4 ∆ 69 ∆ 10 ∆ 21 ∆ 62 ∆ ## ∆ ∆Q I. TOTAL CLIENTS 67 0 8 0 18 2 1 2
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 67 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 18 4 2 1 1 0 2 0 8 15
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Targets Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, TANF participants; and places them into Paid Work Experience activity. Participants are placed at worksites that are either Public or Non-Profit in an effort to obtain unsubsidized employment and long term self-sufficiency.

Targets CalWORKs participants; and places them into Paid Work Experience and On-the-Job activities in an effort to obtain unsubsidized employment and long term self-sufficiency.

P
R
O
V
I
D
E
R
T
O
T
A
L
S
L
A
C
I
T
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
G
A
T
E
W
A
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S

PAGE TOTALS
98 0
98 0
0 0
S
B
W
I
B
T
O
T
A
L
S
F
O
O
T
H
I
L
L
T
O
T
A
L
S
S
E
L
A
C
O
V
E
R
D
U
G
O
T
O
T
A
L
S
L
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S

INTERNATIONAL INST OF LA

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS

ANGELES

CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW

CENTRAL SGV

RESCARE BOYLE HEIGHTS

YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE
0 #DIV/0!

HOLLYWOOD

WORKSOURCE CENTER

CANOGA PARK WEST HILLS

JVS CULVER CITY/MARINA

EL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO

WILSHIRE METRO

WORKSOURCE CENTER

HOUSING AUTHORITY
PACE

CCD -RANCHO DOMINGUEZ

CENTRAL SAN GABRIEL

VALLEY GOODWILL

SOUTH VALLEY WORKSOURCE

GOODWILL

MCS ROSEMAD

MCS SAN GABRIEL VALLEY

WEST COVINA

MCS POMONA

SASSFA PARAMOUNT

SELA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES

JVS PALMDALE

JVS PACOIMA

JVS ANTELOPE VALLEY

HUB CITIES CONSORTIUM

GARDENAVERDUGO

INGLEWOOD

INGLEWOOD (POMONA)
CARSON

TORRANCE

PACIFIC GATEWAY

FOOTHILL
SELACO

PERCENT

OF PLAN
39%

PLANNED

ENROLLMENT
250
450
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 WTW SUBSIDIZED TRANSITIONAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (GROW 055L) - PAID WEX REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DETAIL BY CAREER CENTER PAGE 6 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 1 10 32 8 0 0 0 0 0 2
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 1 0 10 0 32 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 3 0 3 0 17
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 17 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 0 2 11 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 0 0 2 0 11 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 0 0 0 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 0 0 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ENROLLMENT GOALS 38 ∆ 7 ∆ 3 ∆ 52 ∆ ∆ 100 ∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 51 0 0 2 23 0 0 89 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 51 0 0 0 0 2 0 23 0 0 0 13 0 89 0 10 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0% 0% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Targets Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, TANF participants; and places them into Paid Work Experience activity. Participants are placed at worksites that are either Public or Non-Profit in an effort to obtain unsubsidized employment and long term self-sufficiency.

Targets CalWORKs participants; and places them into Paid Work Experience and On-the-Job activities in an effort to obtain unsubsidized employment and long term self-sufficiency.

L
A
C
I
T
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S

PAGE TOTALS

PLANNED PERCENT

ENROLLMENT OF PLAN
S 100 89%
B
W
I
B
T
O
T
A
L
S
F
O
O
T
H
I
L
L
T
O
T
A
L
S
S
E
L
A
C
O
V
E
R
D
U
G
O
T
O
T
A
L
S
L
A
C
O
U
N
T
Y
T
O
T
A
L
S
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
R
T
O
T
A
L
S

YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE JVS MARINA DEL REY /

CULVER CITY

LAI / PACE

WILSHIRE METRO

WORKSOURCE CENTER

LAO / HUB CITIES

CENTRAL SAN GABRIEL

VALLEY GOODWILL

JVS ANTELOPE VALLEY
JVS Goodwill / PACOIMA

JVS PALMDALE

GARDENA

VERDUGO

INGLEWOOD

INGLEWOOD (POMONA)
CARSON

FOOTHILL
451
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD PAGE 7
GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 06/30/22 REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022

HOMELESS INITITAIVE
ENROLLMENT GOALS 60 ∆ 60 ∆ 60 ∆ 60 ∆ 60 ∆ ∆ 300 ∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 20 14 12 21 4 0 0 0 0 71
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 20 0 14 4 12 0 21 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 5 10
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $ - $ - $ - $ -
GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 06/30/22 REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022

TSE COMMUNITY AMBASSADOR NETWORK PROGRAN (CAN)
∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 5 2 11 6 4 8 6 4 5 51
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 5 0 2 0 11 0 6 0 4 0 8 0 6 0 4 0 5 0 51 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRANSFER TO OTHER AGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE 0 $ -
Planned Enrollments are based on individual need and available funds.

SOUTHEAST LA CRENSHAW

PAGE TOTALS

PLANNED PERCENT
113%

ENROLLMENT OF PLAN

ENROLLMENT OF PLAN
The program is part of a countywide homeless initiative to target eligible CalWORKs families to participate in the Transitional Subsidized Employment (TSE) programs to improve their ability to become self-sufficient and retain housing. Program services will include paid work experience, specialized work experience, on-the-job training and classroom training. 300 24%

METRO NORTH WORKSOURCE
CENTER

UNION STATION HOMELESS

SERVICES

JVS CPC ANTELOPE VALLEY

JVS PALMDALE
The program is part of a countywide initiative to target eligible CalWORKs families to participate in the Transitional Subsidized Employment (TSE) programs to improve their ability to become self-sufficient . Program services will include paid work experience, LAI PACE LAI WILSHIRE METRO EL PROYECTO DEL BARIO PAGE TOTALS

PLANNED PERCENT

INGLEWOOD

JVS PALMDALE

JVS ANTELOPE VALLEY

CCD-RANCHO DOMINGUEZ

LAO JVS MARINA DEL REY

PACIFIC GATEWAY
45 452
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 COLLEGE WORK STUDY PROGRAM (150L) REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DETAIL BY COLLEGE PAGE 8 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 13 22 5 22 14 0 4 10 0 0 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 13 0 22 0 5 0 22 0 14 0 0 0 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 0 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0
B. NEW 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0
ENROLLMENT GOALS 159 ∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 90
A. CARRIED IN 0
B. NEW 90 0 18
II. TOTAL EXITS 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0
% OF PLACEMENT 0%
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $0.00 L.A. CITY COLLEGE
EAST L.A. COLLEGE

EL CAMINO /COMPTON
L.A. MISSION COLLEGE
L.A. PIERCE COLLEGE
WEST L.A. COLLEGE
L.A. SOUTHWEST COLLEGE

LONG BEACH CITY COLLEGE
Targets CalWORKs participants/Individuals whose families are on Public Assistance; enrolled in Community Colleges; and places them into a Paid Work Experience activity. Participants are placed at worksites that are either Public or Non-Profit in an effort to obtain unsubsidized employment and long term self-sufficiency.

PLANNED PERCENT

ENROLLMENT
159

OF PLAN
57%

PAGE TOTALS
453
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD PAGE 9
GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DCFS ILP PROGRAM (006L TIER I)
ENROLLMENT GOALS ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ 16 ∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT 0%
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $ -
∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 0 0 0 0 0
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0
TRANSFER TO OTHER AGENCY 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT

AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE
GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 06/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DCFS ILP PROGRAM (007L TIER II)
ENROLLMENT GOALS ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ 70 ∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 5 0 12 8 2 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 4 1 46
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 5 0 0 0 12 4 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 46 6 9 II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT 0%
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $ -
∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 3 0 0 0 3
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0
TRANSFER TO OTHER AGENCY 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT

AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE

ENROLLMENT OF PLAN
Lao/El Proyecto Del Barrio

PERCENT
44%

JVS (ANTELOPE VALLEY)
Lao / San Gabriel Valley
Serving Youth in the Foster Care Independent Living Program, between 16-17 years of age, throughout Los Angeles County.

PAGE TOTALS

PACIFIC GATEWAY

PLANNED

GARDENA

INGLEWOOD

INGLEWOOD POMONA
CARSON

TORRANCE CAREER CENTER

FOOTHILL

VERDUGO

JVS (MARINA DEL REY)

PAGE TOTALS

ENROLLMENT
16 JVS (ANTELOPE VALLEY)

SELA AREA

SOCIAL SERVICES

PERCENT

OF PLAN

MCS HOLLYWOOD

MCS COVINA

JVS (MARINA DEL REY)
CARSON

PLANNED
70 SELACO PIC

PACIFIC GATEWAY

HOLLYWOOD NORTH

WORKSOURCE CENTER
66%

MCS SAN GARBRIEL VALLEY
SELACO

FOOTHILL

MCS COVINA

GARDENA

TORRANCE

VERDUGO

INGLEWOOD

INGLEWOOD POMONA

HUB CITIES

CANOGA PARK

YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE
El PROYECTO DEL BARRIO

LAO / HUB CITIES

CANOGA PARK

YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE

LAO / SASSFA
Serving Youth in the Foster Care Independent Living Program, between 18-21 years of age, throughout Los Angeles County. 454
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD PAGE 10
GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 06/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DPSS PROBATION PROGRAM (950L TIER I)
ENROLLMENT GOALS ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ 1 ∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT 0%
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $ -
GRANT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 06/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 DPSS PROBATION PROGRAM (951L TIER II)
ENROLLMENT GOALS ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
A. CARRIED IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. NEW 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1
II. TOTAL EXITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER TERMINATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% OF PLACEMENT 0%
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE 0.00 $ - SELA AREA SOCIAL SERVICES Serving Youth on probation, between 16-17 years of age, throughout Los Angeles County. INGLEWOOD INGEWOOD INGLEWOOD (POMONA) HOLLYWOOD WORKSOURCE CTR

FOOTHILL

PACIFIC GATEWAY

HUBCITIES

YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE

SELA AREA

SOCIAL SERVICES

YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE

MCS SAN GABRIEL VALLEY

PAGE TOTALS

PLANNED
2 5 80%

PERCENT

ENROLLMENT OF PLAN
Serving Youth on probation, between 18-21 years of age, throughout Los Angeles County. 50%

INGLEWOOD (POMONA)

HOLLYWOOD

WORKSOURCE CTR

FOOTHILL

PACFICI GATEWAY

HUB CITIES

PLANNED PERCENT

ENROLLMENT OF PLAN
SELACO

MCS SAN GABRIEL VALLEY

PAGE TOTALS
455
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022
PAGE 11

YOUTHBUILD
GRANT TERM: 1/01/2020 TO 3/31/2024
REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2020 TO 6/30/2022
Planned % of ∆Q
Actual Services Plan
PENDING ENROLLMENTS 2
ENROLLMENTS 42 73 58% 7
EDUCATION & EMPLOYMENT 10 55 18% 4
-Education (Obtained High School Diploma) 9 5
-Entered Employment 6 0
ATTAINMENT OF DEGREE/CERTIFICATE 27 58 46% 15
LITERACY & NUMERACY ATTAINMENT 2 2 100% 2
RETENTION (Quarter 4) 2 2 100% 2
RECIDIVISM 0 0 #DIV/0!
HOME REHABILITATION AND REPAIRS PROGRAM (HRRP) - 2ND DISTRICT GRANT TERM: 7/01/2020 TO 6/30/2022
FINAL REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2020 TO 6/30/2022
Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
HOME REPAIR PROJECTS 15 20 75% 5
HOME REPAIR COMPLETIONS 15 20 75% 5
CLEARED HOME REPAIR APPLICATIONS BY CDBG 5 5
PENDING HOME REPAIR APPLICATIONS/INTAKE/INQUIRIES 0 0 HRRP The HRRP program provides residential home repairs to 18-20 eligible low income homeowners residing in the 2nd District and Athens-Westmont area that includes Inglewood and Lennox.

Repairs promote and eliminate unhealthy and unsafe living conditions. Funding is sponsored by the Los Angeles Community Development Block Grants. 3/2022-Grant extension received. The SBWIB YouthBuild program will provide educational, occupational skills training in construction and leadership skills to disadvantaged youth ages 16-24 years residing in targeted communities. Outcome measures are based on qualified enrollment criteria. The SBWIB YouthBuild partnership includes two required partners the YouthBuild Charter School of California (Education) and the Habitat for Humanity of Greater Los Angeles (Housing Construction). YOUTHBUILD **Open enrollment process
456
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 12
Chancellor Apprenticeship Initiative CAI #4 – EL Camino College (Bio-Flex Apprenticeship) Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS 2 50 4% 0
Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan

ENROLLMENTS
PRE-APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS 16 15 107% 0
APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS - Aero-Flex, Bio-Flex, Other 0 25 0% 0 3 35 9% 0

COMPLETIONS
PRE-APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS 8 4
APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS - Aero-Flex, Bio-Flex, Other 0 0 APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS - Construction 3 1

JOB PLACEMENT
PRE-APPRENTICESHIP JOB PLACEMENT - Aero-Flex and Bio-Flex 4 2 2 0
Assist the District in the enrollment of 50 apprentices into Bio-Flex and help to build additional Bioscience apprenticeship programs.

GRANT TERM: 01/01/2020 TO 12/31/2022
CAI #4 - ECC

BIO-FLEX RA
REPORT PERIOD: 01/1/2020 TO 6/30/2022

GROW TAYPORTUNITY APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM
GRANT TERM: 7/01/2021 TO 06/30/2022
REPORT PERIOD: 7/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022
Enroll 15 pre-apprentices in either Aero-Flex or Bio-Flex and 25 Apprentices. Additionally 35 apprentices will be enrolled into construction training programs, ages 18- 24 years old.

APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS - Construction
APPRENTICESHIP JOB PLACEMENT - Construction
GROW
TAYportunity
457
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 13
REPORT PERIOD: 9/21/2021 TO 6/30/2022
Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
11 8 138% 5
11 10 110% 4
51 30 170% 31
21 24 88% 15
REPORT PERIOD: 11/03/2021 TO 6/30/2022
Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
ENROLLMENTS 10 50 20% 5

LA COUNTY SUPERVISOR SECOND DISTRICT (BIO-FLEX PRE-APPRENTICESHIP) REPORT PERIOD: 3/01/2022 TO 6/30/2022 (NEW)
Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
ENROLLMENTS 0 75 0% 0
*Contract received 6/2022
Enroll thirty (30) individuals from the Aero-Flex or Bio-Flex Pre-Apprenticeship Programs, graduate twenty-four (24), involve eight (8) schools, and engage ten (10) businesses to support the Pre-Apprenticeships through work-based learning.

SCHOOLS INVOLVED

HOWMET FOUNDATION - GRANT
GRANT TERM: 9/21/2021 TO 8/31/2022
Howmet

BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT

ENROLLMENTS

ATTAINMENT OF CREDENTIAL/CERTIFICATE
Identify and train 50 low-income women, women of color, and/or other individuals with multiple barriers in the advanced Irvine Foundation

IRVINE FOUNDATION - GRANT
GRANT TERM: 11/03/2021 TO 11/03/2023
Provide life sciences career exploration and training to at least 75 participants residing within the Second District.

GRANT TERM: 3/01/2022 - 6/30/2023

LAC BOS
District 2
458
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 14
DOL Scaling Apprenticeship Grant - West LA College (Bio-Flex & Aero-Flex Apprenticeship & Pre-Apprenticeship) Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan

APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS
441 1240 36% 316
OTHER PROJECT PARTNER APPRENTICSHIP ENROLLMENTS 1909 3760 51% 0 2350 5000 47%

APPRENTICESHIP COMPLETIONS
6 2
1063 0
1069

PRE-APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS
467 0
Employment Training Panel (ETP) - Multiple Employer Contract (MEC) REPORT PERIOD: 11/22/2021 TO 6/30/2022
Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
17 15 113% 12
162 515 31% 162
0 515 0%

DOL RA & PA
Nationwide 4 year grant provided by the United States Department of Labor through WLAC. The goal is to recruit and enroll 5,000 apprentices. SBWIB is responsible for 1,240 apprenticeship enrollments. SBWIB pre-apprenticeship enrollments an allowable expense, but not a deliverable.

OTHER PARTNER APPRENTICE COMPLETIONS
GRANT TERM: 11/22/2021 TO 11/21/2023

TOTAL PROJECT APPRENTICE COMPLETIONS

TOTAL APPRENTICE ENROLLMENTS

SBWIB APPRENTICE COMPLETIONS

TOTAL PROJECT APPRENTICE COMPLETIONS

RETENTION IN EMPLOYMENT

ETP - MEC

EMPLOYER PARTNERS
ENROLLMENTS (100%)
Training reimbursement for employers from Employment Training Panel Fund.

GRANT TERM: 07/15/2019 TO 07/14/2023

OTHER PARTNER PRE-APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS

AVERAGE WAGE AFTER EMPLOYMENT
REPORT PERIOD: 07/15/2019 TO 6/30/2022

SBWIB APPRENTICESHIP ENROLLMENTS
459
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 15
Program % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
6 5 120% 1
5 5 100% 5
ENTERED INTO EMPLOYMENT 1 5 20% 1

YOUTH AT WORK EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
GRANT TERM: 7/1/2021 TO 6/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 7/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
TOTAL ENROLLMENTS 293 366 80% 38
CALWORKS 39 123 5
OUSY 178 162 15
FOSTER YOUTH 24 24 2
PROBATION YOUTH 1 12 1
SYSTEM INVOLVED YOUTH (New) 51 45 15
Enroll five youth ages 18-24, from LA County Supervisory District 4, into the Aero-Flex Pre-Apprenticeship Program, graduate the youth and place them into unsubsidized employment. LACYJ WDACS

ENROLLMENTS

ATTAINMENT OF CREDENTIAL/CERTIFICATE
GRANT TERM: 7/1/2021 TO 06/30/2022
REPORT PERIOD: 7/1/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Youth at Work
The Youth At Work Employment Program (also referred to as the Summer Jobs Programs) provides eligible youth ages 14-21 with paid work experience and education support year-round and during school breaks.

LACYJ WDACS
460
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 16

INVEST LA COUNTY PROBATION GRANT
GRANT TERM: 7/1/2021 TO 6/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 7/1/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
ENROLLMENTS 61 120 51% 26
ENROLLED INTO TRAINING 35 72 49% 13
TRAINING COMPLETION 9 61 15% 3
UNSUBSIDIZED PLACEMENTS 35 58 60% 11
TRAINING RELATED PLACEMENTS 9 10 90% 3
RETENTION SERVICES (2ND QUARTER) 0 57 0%
RETENTION SERVICES (4TH QUARTER) 0 54 0%

FAMILIES FIRST
GRANT TERM: 7/1/2021 TO 6/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 7/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
ORIENTATIONS/WORKSHOPS 26 50 52% 12
INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS 59 50 118% 33
JOB REFERRALS / INTERVIEWS 247 50 494% 71
JOB READINESS / RESUME COMPLETION 23 50 46% 13
PLACEMENT 0 10 0%

HACLA GRANT
GRANT TERM: 12/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 12/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Qrt. % of Year % of ∆Q
Activities Plan Plan Actual Plan Plan
REFERRAL OF ELIGIBLE YOUTH & REENTRY CLIENTS 19 19 100% 24 50 48% 10 PLACEMENTS 14 14 100% 14 35 40% 10 HACLA
SBWIB is being contracted by the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, for referral of youth and reenrty participants that reside at the Mar Vista Gardens Housing Project to HACLA for workforce development programming including assisting participant as they become employable and remain employed. PY22-22 The South Bay WIB, Inc., will provide job development staff support and services to Family First Charter School students at the Century Regional Detention Facility. Job Development services will include job readiness workshops, one-on- one interviewing and counseling, job match and referrals to employment and worksites, progress monitoring and follow-up. INVEST YEAR 3 Provide work-based learning services to 120 referred Probation Adult participants including BluePrint Workplace for Success training, short-term vocational training, Paid Work Experience, interviews and job referrals, and job placement.
461
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 17

SECTOR GRANT - FRIENDS OUTSIDE OF LOS ANGELES
GRANT TERM: 01/01/2022 TO 12/31/2022
REPORT PERIOD: 01/01/2022 TO 6/30/2022
Qrt. % Year % of ∆Q
Activities Plan Plan Actual Plan Plan
COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT(S) 6 6 100% 19 20 95% 6
ENROLLMENT 6 6 100% 19 20 95% 6
ENROLLMENT INTO TRAINING 5 5 100% 13 12 108% 8
* Agreement pending

VETERANS EMPLOYMENT RELATED ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (VEAP)
GRANT TERM: 4/01/2021 TO 3/31/2023 REPORT PERIOD: 4/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
ENROLLMENTS (100%) 10 75 13% 0
ATTAINMENT OF CREDENTIAL/CERTIFICATE (90%) 0 68 0% 0
ENTERED EMPLOYMENT RATE (80%) 0 60 0% 0
EMPLOYMENT RETENTION (70%) 0 42 0%
AVERAGE WAGE AT EMPLOYMENT $ -

CDA DENTAL ASSISTANT PILOT
GRANT TERM: 10/01/2021 TO 09/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 10/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
ENROLLMENTS 0 15 0% 0
TRAINING COMPLETION 0 12 0% 0
PAID WORK EXPERIENCE 0 10 0% 0
EMPLOYMENT 0 11 0% CDA Dental Assistant
The CDA Dental Assistant Piolt project is designed to assist 15 eligible dislocated/displaced workers and provide careerpath training, paid hands-on work experience and employment in the dental field as a CDA Dental Assistant.

Sector Grant - FOLA
SBWIB is being contracted by FOLA to provide career pathways case management for recently released prisoners into short-term vocational training and assisting them as they need to become employable and remain employed. Funding by the Los Angeles County, Office of Diversion and Reentry. VEAP - AATA (SBWIB Sub-contractor) The VEAP project(s) will assist eligible veterans with significant barriers to employment (i.e., long-term unemployed, homeless, transitioning) to receive career and training services leading to employment in high growth employment sectors such as Construction Trades. Additionally, SBWIB has partnered with AATA to provide employment and training services as a subcontractor. 462
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 18

CALIFORNIA CAREER PATHWAYS GRANTS - ACADEMY
GRANT TERM: 01/01/2022 TO 8/31/2023 REPORT PERIOD: 01/01/2022 TO 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q Year % of ∆
Activities Plan Plan Activities Plan Plan
OPPORTUNITIES OFFERED 252 106 238% 97 132 86 153% 0
COMPANY TOURS 2 10 20% 2 3 4 75% 0
GUEST SPEAKERS/ADVISORY BOARD 23 56 41% 8 60 32 188% 0
INTERNSHIP 51 75 68% 24 43 50 86% 0
EVENT VENDORS 53 100 53% 0 115 50 230% 0
BLUEPRINT 75 75 100% 59 269 200 135% 0

CALIFORNIA CAREER PATHWAYS GRANTS - ONSITE PROGRAM
GRANT TERM: 10/01/2021 TO 8/31/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 10/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q
Activities Plan Plan
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT 2824 340 831% 320
EMPLOYERS CONNECTED 54 120 45% 19
WORKSHOPS 90 32 281% 20
GUEST SPEAKERS 6 12 50% 1
INTERNSHIPS 74 40 185% 55
JOB LEADS 826 300 275% 155
SBWIB will supply staff onsite at each of theCentinela Valley Union High School District's four high schools to provide work-based learning support and other career pathway activities.

INGLEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT STRONG WORKFORCE
GRANT TERM: 10/07/2021 TO 9/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 10/07/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Year % ∆Q
Activities Plan Plan
BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT/GUEST SPEAKERS 34 35 97% 22
INTERSHIPS 47 50 94% 13
OCCUPATIONAL TRAINING 6 2 300% 4
BLUEPRINT/WORK READINESS 47 50 94% 13
20-21 CVUHSD (FINAL)
Centinela Valley Union
High School District
(CVUHSD)
20-21 Centinela Valley Union
High School District
(CVUHSD)
SBWIB will provide work-based learning support to Centinela Valley Union High School District's nine academies and two career pathways. SBWIB will outreach to employers, engage in work based learning activities, which include guest speaking, providing opportunities for job shadowing, company tours, hosting interns, or serving as an advisory board member. Other activities will include participation in activities such as Career Day and Maker Faire.

Inglewood Unified
School District
SBWIB will provide outreach to employers, work readiness, internships, hiring and recruitment activities. Centinela Valley Union High School District (CVUHSD) 463
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 19

AMERICORPS YOUTHBUILD
GRANT TERM: 8/15/2019 TO 8/14/2022
REPORT PERIOD: 08/15/2019 TO 6/30/2022
Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
FULL-TIME ENROLLMENTS (TEACHERS AIDES) 4 4 100% 0
QUARTER-TIME ENROLLMENTS (YOUTHBUILD MEMBERS) 34 88 39% 2 NATIONAL SERVICE EVENTS / IN-SERVICE 14 40 35% 0
SCHOLARSHIP ATTAINMENT 8 40 20% 4
* 1 TA dropped due to medical
** Activities impacted by COVID-19

HOMELESS LA RISE (REGIONAL)
GRANT TERM: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 07/01/2021 TO 6/30/2022 Qrt. % Year % of ∆Q
Activities Plan Plan Plan Plan
ENROLLMENTS 39 31 126% 31 126% 14
EMPLOYMENT 40 22 182% 22 182% 20
EMPLOYMENT RATE - 2ND QRT AFTER EXIT 0 #DIV/0! 20 0%
EMPLOYMENT RATE - 4TH QRT AFTER EXIT 0 #DIV/0! 12 0%
WAGE AT EMPLOYMENT $ 19.60
SoCalGas
GRANT TERM: 11/1/2021 TO 10/31/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 1/01/2022 TO 6/30/2022 Qrt. % Year % of ∆Q
Activities Plan Plan Actual Plan Plan
Recuitment-Interested SoCalGas Applicants 183 50 366% 431 200 128% 84 Referral of applicants to SoCalGas Employment Opportunities 28 25 112% 27 100 0% 3 Placement 0 6 0% 0 25 0%
#DIV/0!
Homeless LA Rise Year 3 AmeriCorps
8/2021-New Year Allottment and Goals. The AmeriCorps project supports resources to the SBWIB YouthBuild programs by providing teachers aides. YouthBuild members can enroll into the program and earn credits/hours toward scholarships through training and community engagement activities. New funds awarded for continuation of services for year three (agreement pending). SoCalGas (Outcomes include carry-in activities)
Effective 10/01/18, SBWIB will serve 18 and over Homeless Individuals through a Transitional Subsidized Employment Program leading towards Unsubsidized employment in the competitive marketplace that is along an articulated career pathway.
464
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 20

BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS (BSCC) YOUTH REINVESTMENT PROGRAM GRANT TERM: 10/01/2019 TO 2/28/2023
REPORT PERIOD: 10/01/2019 TO 6/30/2022
Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
REFERRALS (100%) 190 150 127%
PENDING INTAKE/PARENT APPT. (100%) 20 0 #DIV/0! 9
RISK ASSESSMENT (100%) 29 75 39% 0
ENROLLMENTS (100%) 170 150 113% 38
INTEVENTION WORKSHOPS/WORK READINESS PREPARATION 170 75 227% 38 PAID WORK EXPERIENCE, INTERNSHIP OR OJT 113 75 151% 27
FOLLOW-UP SERVICES FOR 12 MONTHS 96 150 64% 12
WORKFORCE ACCELERATOR 9.0
GRANT TERM: 8/01/2021 TO 12/31/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 8/01/2021 to 6/30/2022 Year % of ∆Q
Enrolled Plan Plan
48 75 64% 19
22 64 22
APPRENTICES (100%) 14 15 14
EMPLOYMENT AT EXIT (80%) 0 60 0
* 18 Apprentices pending for June 2022 start

EL CAMINO COLLEGE CAREER PATHWAYS
GRANT TERM: 3/01/2022 TO 6/30/2022 REPORT PERIOD: 3/01/2022 TO 6/30/2022 Year % ∆Q
Activities Plan Plan
STUDENT ENGAGEMENTS 450 60 750% 450
WORKSHOPS 11 6 183% 11
RECRUITING EVENTS 2 2 100% 2
INTERNSHIPS/EMPLOYMENT 27 25 108% 27
JOB LEADS 218 100 218% 218 YOUTH REINVESTMENT
This project will provide job readiness, work experience opportunities and employment services.

This project is in partnership with SELACO, Health Impact and the Hosptial Assocation to train or place into apprenticeship 75 under presented indivduals in the healthcare field. Occupations include: Speciality Nursing, CNA, Clinical Laboratory and Phlebotemy

YOUTH REINVESTMENT
This project will provide services to Inglewood, Hawthorne and Lennox youth that are disproportionally affected by violence and will receive evidence-based services for diversion, restorative justice, and employment opportunities through the Inglewood Community and Regional Engagement Violence Intervention and Prevention (I-CARE VIP) collaboration. The project will serve 100 youth ages 14-18 and provide intervention and diversion activities, case management along with paid pre-employment training, paid work experience and job search assistance. WAF 9.0 ENROLLMENTS (100%)
CREDENTIAL ATTAINED (85%)
465
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD

SPECIAL PROJECTS SUMMARY
PAGE 21

COVID NDWG EMPLOYMENT RECOVERY GRANT
GRANT TERM: 4/10/2020 TO 3/31/2023 REPORT PERIOD: 4/10/2020 TO 6/30/2022 ∆Q
I. TOTAL CLIENTS 232
A. ENROLLED 227 98% 25
B. NEW 4 25
C. TRAINING 59 7
D. OJT 16 0
E. Pre-Apprenticeship/Apprenticeship 0
II. TOTAL EXITS 133 26
III. TOTAL UNSUBSIDIZED EMPLOYMENT 114 22
A. RETRAINING 42 9
ALSO ATTAINED CREDENTIAL 42 9
B. CALLED BACK WITH EMPLOYER 0
IV. % PLACEMENT (INCL. CALL BACKS) 86%
V. % PLACEMENT (EXCL. CALL BACKS) 86%
AVERAGE PLACEMENT WAGE $ 22.90 SBWIB TOTALS
Grant Plan
12/2021-SBWIB received additional funds ($240K), enrollment slots (55) and a period of performance extension through March 31, 2023. The NDWG Employment Recovery grant is a statewide grant to provide employment and training services to 232 displaced workers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. 466
PROGRAM YEAR 2021 / 2022 SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD PAGE 22
PRISON TO EMPLOYMENT REPORT PERIOD: 12/01/2019 TO 6/30/2022 GRANT PERIOD: 12/01/2019 TO 3/31/2022

NON-FINAL
Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ
TOTAL PLANNED ENROLLMENTS 35 282 269 28 35 28 28
I. TOTAL CLIENTS
A. Individual Direct Services 99 0 830 0 584 0 36 0 82 0 52 0 14 0 1697 0 B. Supportive Services & Earn and Learn 65 0 284 0 436 0 28 0 96 0 50 0 1 0 960 0 II. ACTIVITIES
SUBSIDZED EMPLOYMENT 8 0 216 0 189 0 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 430 0 Transfer to Other Agency 0 0
TRAINING 51 0 178 0 145 0 13 0 35 0 17 0 7 0 446 0 146% CREDENTIAL OBTAINED 30 0 126 0 101 0 12 0 30 0 14 0 5 0 318 0 136% UNSUBSIDZED EMPLOYMENT 54 0 481 0 421 0 3 0 32 0 38 0 6 0 1035 0 245%

QUARTERLY REPORTING

PERCENT
Prison to Employment is a regional employment and training program to assist formerly incarcerated individuals. On behalf of the LA Basin, SBWIB serves as the fiscal agent and program lead on behalf of the seven Workforce Boards in Los Angeles County.
422
315%
305
233

FOOTHILL
SBWIB

LA CITY

LA COUNTY

PACIFIC GATEWAY
TOTALS

PLANNED

VERDUGO
SELACO
705 OF PLAN
400 424%
305
467
PAGE 23
Other Grants
City of Lomita - NEW
Grant Term: January 2022 through December 2022
Funding Amount: $100,000
Activities: Designed, printed and mailed a postcard announcing services to every business in the city; direct outreach has begun to all Lomita businesses In partnership with the City of Lomita, the SBWIB is creating a new program to offer enhanced services to businesses in the City of Lomita. The project is funded by Lomita through a grant received from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARAP). The partnership includes the Lomita Chamber of Commerce and will be designed to accelerate economic recovery for Lomita businesses.

Customer Service Training - City of Hawthorne and City of Gardena GRANT TERM: Open
Over 95 people from the City of Hawthorne and 5 people from the City of Gardena have completed the SBWIB’s customer service training. The training utilizes the SBWIB’s successful Blueprint for Workplace Success model and is available to South Bay municipalities for employee training at no cost for one year. The class is entirely online, self-paced, interactive, available in English and Spanish, and includes a pre- and postassessment and comprehension quiz for each module. 468
PAGE 24
Other Grants (cont.)
New Grants - waiting for contract
Funding Amount: $55,000 per year
Chancellor Apprenticeship Initiative (CAI #5) – West Los Angeles College (Health-Flex Apprenticeship) Funding Amount: $100,000
Assist in the enrollment of 80 apprentices into Health-Flex and help to build additional healthcare apprenticeship programs.

Chancellor Apprenticeship Initiative (CAI #6) – El Camino College (IT-Flex Apprenticeship) Funding Amount: $100,000
CA DIR SAEEI Grant (Apprenticeship)
Funding Amount: $2,000,000
GRANT TERM: 7/01/2022 TO 2/28/2025
Enroll at least 417 participants into DAS apprenticeship.

GRANT TERM: 4/01/2022 TO 2/28/2025
GRANT TERM: 4/01/2022 TO 2/28/2025
Assist in the enrollment of 80 apprentices into IT-Flex and help to build additional IT apprenticeship programs.

WLAC Allied Health Project - NEW
GRANT TERM: 11/03/2021 TO 11/03/2023
The SBWIB was retained by WLAC to facilitate discussions about Allied Health training options among 13 community Colleges throughout LA County. Discussions will include a variety of topics that will ensure they are meeting the needs of students and industry. Employer speakers are also arranged to attend by the SBWIB to present to the schools and discuss their hiring needs. 469
Inglewood Teen Center New Returning Total Inglewood Teen Center New Returning Total Inglewood 8 24 32 Inglewood 4 44 48
Hawthorne 0 0 0 Hawthorne 0 0 0
Lawndale 0 0 0 Lawndale 0 0 0
Gardena 0 0 0 Gardena 0 0 0
TOTAL 8 24 32 TOTAL 4 44 48
Hawthorne Teen Center New Returning Total Hawthorne Teen Center New Returning Total Inglewood 0 0 Inglewood 0 2 2
Hawthorne 1 36 37 Hawthorne 12 38 0
Lawndale 0 0 0 Lawndale 0 0 0
Gardena 0 0 0 Gardena 0 0 0
Torrance 0 0 0 Torrance 0 0 0
TOTAL 1 36 37 TOTAL 12 40 52
Inglewood Teen Center New Returning Total QUARTER TOTAL VISITS Qurater 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total Inglewood 6 33 39 Inglewood Teen Center 66 77 44 119 306 Hawthorne 0 0 0 Hawthorne Teen Center 154 82 115 128 479 Lawndale 0 0 0
Gardena 0 0 0
TOTAL 6 33 39
Hawthorne Teen Center New Returning Total
Inglewood 0 0 0
Hawthorne 2 37 39
Lawndale 0 0 0
Gardena 0 0 0
Torrance 0 0 0
TOTAL 2 37 39
Teen Center Attendance Report -4th Quarter
April 1, 2022- April 30, 2022 June 1, 2022- June 30, 2022 May 1, 2022- May 31, 2022
470
Save the Date
27th Annual Awards Ceremony
5 - 6 pm Reception
6 pm Dinner Program begins
Torrance Marriott South Bay
3635 Fashion Way, Torrance, CA 90503
Thursday, November 3, 2022
471
Hawthorne Hermosa Beach Gardena Lawndale Redondo Beach Manhattan Beach Carson El Segundo Lomita Torrance Inglewood 11539 Hawthorne Boulevard, 5th Floor, Suite #500, Hawthorne CA 90250 / w. 310.970.7700 / f. 310.970.7711 PRESS RELEASE South Bay Workforce Investment Board
11539 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 500
May 17, 2022 Hawthorne, CA 90250
Contact: 310-970-7700

South Bay Workforce Investment Board Receives
$2 Million Grant from California Department of Industrial Relations To Train Candidates as Apprentices for High Demand Jobs INGLEWOOD – The South Bay Workforce Investment Board (SBWIB) has received a $2 million Grant from the California Department of Industrial Relations to implement the SBWIB’s Expanding Flexible Apprenticeship in California (EFAC) program that will help train individuals to fill high demand positions in a variety of work sectors throughout the state.

The EFAC program will focus on enrolling 417 participants into non-traditional registered apprenticeship occupations in sectors that include Advanced Manufacturing, Healthcare, Information Technology, Arts, Media and Entertainment and Energy/Climate. Based on labor market information and ongoing employer conversations, these sectors are in need within the local region and throughout California. “Our novel approach to addressing the demand for skilled professionals over the past several years has been to use our “Flex” model for apprenticeship training, which has attracted an increasing number of industry and employer partners,” noted SBWIB Executive Director Jan Vogel. “EFAC enables us to continue building a productive and strong relationship between employers, the workforce system and both K-12 and higher education,” he concluded.

The SBWIB’s overall project goal for developing and expanding registered apprenticeships will be to not only employ hundreds of apprentices, but to also grow the SBWIB’s existing non-traditional apprenticeship program and to help its partners create or expand their programs. The SBWIB will provide training, supportive services and tracking necessary to ensure successful completion of apprenticeship training.

The SBWIB’s successful apprenticeship program that originally focused on the aerospace and bioscience sectors have expanded to many industries, creating flexible training models to meet the needs of employers with options to customize the training for their specific work environment.

The SBWIB provides no-cost business services, job search and employment preparation support to job seekers at its four One-Stop Business and Career Centers serving 11 South Bay communities that include the city of Inglewood, Hawthorne, Gardena, Carson, El Segundo, Lawndale, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Torrance and Lomita. The SBWIB also operates two teen centers in Hawthorne and Inglewood. For more information please call (310) 970-7700 or visit www.sbwib.org. # # #
472
Hawthorne Hermosa Beach Gardena Lawndale Redondo Beach Manhattan Beach Carson El Segundo Lomita Torrance Inglewood 11539 Hawthorne Boulevard, 5th Floor, Suite #500, Hawthorne CA 90250 / w. 310.970.7700 / f. 310.970.7711 Photo caption: The SBWIB has received a $2 million Grant from the California Department of Industrial Relations to implement the SBWIB’s Expanding Flexible Apprenticeship in California program that will help train individuals to fill high demand positions in a variety of work sectors throughout the state. Pictured are Edwin Gamez, Aero-Flex Pre-Apprenticeship and West LA College graduate and Apprenticeship participant with Matt Liknaitzky, The Airplane Factory Co-CEO Torrance, CA, congratulating Edwin on his accomplishment. 473
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0486
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022

APPOINTMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE BOARD
(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council appoint one new member to the Civil Service Board for a four-year term ending July 15, 2026.

Executive Summary:

At its August 9, 2022 4:15 p.m. meeting, City Council conducted interviews for one Civil Service Board vacancy. After receiving a request from James C. Petti to withdraw his application, Council interviewed the remaining two applicants, Kathryn Jones (Attachment 1) and Thor L. Legvold (Attachment 2). Staff recommends City Council appoint one new member to the Civil Service Board for a four-year term ending July 15, 2026.

Background:

In accordance with Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 2.76, the Civil Service Board shall consist of five members appointed by the City Council for terms of four years. Members of the Civil Service Board shall be qualified electors of the City and shall not hold any salaried public office or employment with the City of Hermosa Beach.

The Civil Service Board functions as the City’s Review Board pertaining to personnel functions and Civil Service Rules and Regulations in conjunction with N.S. 211 (People’s Ordinance). Duties include review and/or approval of City job specifications and eligibility lists as outlined in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Sections 2.76.060 - 2.76.090.

The Civil Service Board meets regularly in the Council Chambers at 5:00 p.m. on the third Wednesday of each month, with additional meetings called, if needed. In alignment with the City Council, the board is currently meeting in a hybrid format to give members of the public and the board the option to join a meeting via Zoom or in-person.

At its April 26, 2022 meeting, the City Council directed the City Clerk to advertise for applicants to fill the Civil Service Board term due to expire July 15, 2022. Along with e-notifications, notice was posted on May 9, 2022 on the City’s website and was published in the Easy Reader, with an application filing City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™474
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0486
on May 9, 2022 on the City’s website and was published in the Easy Reader, with an application filing deadline of 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 29, 2022.

At its July 12, 2022 meeting, City Council received applications from Kathryn Jones, Thor L. Legvold, and James C. Pettis and scheduled interviews for August 9, 2022. Subsequent to the acceptance of applications, James C. Pettis withdrew his application from the City Clerk’s office on August 3, 2022.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
April 26, 2022 (Regular Meeting) City Council directed the City Clerk to advertise for app July 12, 2022 (Regular Meeting) City Council received applications from Kathryn Jones 9, 2022 to fill one vacancy for a four-year term.

Discussion:

After the withdraw of an application by James C. Pettis, applications from Kathryn Jones (Attachment 1) and Thor L. Legvold (Attachment 2) remain or City Council consideration.

Having conducted interviews at 4:15 p.m. on August 9, 2022, staff recommends City Council appoint one new member to the Civil Service Board for a four-year term ending July 15, 2026.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Governance Element
Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.

Policies:
· 1.1 Open meetings. Maintain the community’s trust by holding meetings in which decisions are being made, that are open and available for all community members to attend, participate, or view remotely.
· 1.4 Consensus oriented. Strive to utilize a consensus-oriented decision-making process. · 1.7 Diversity of representation. Strive to reflect a comprehensive cross-section of the community in appointments to Commission and Advisory Committees.

Goal 2. The community is active and engaged in decision-making process.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™475
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0486
Policies:
· 2.3 Public participation guidelines. Establish parameters and guidelines to ensure public participation is promoted through diverse methods.
· 2.6 Responsive to community needs. Continue to be responsive to community inquiries, providing public information and recording feedback from community interactions.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

Attachments:

1. Application for Kathryn Jones

2. Application for Thor L. Legvold

3. Link to April 26, 2022 City Council Staff Report

4. Link to July 12, 2022 City Council Staff Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Myra Maravilla, City Clerk
Concur: Vanessa Godinez, Human Resources Manager
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
Thor L. Legvold, Psy.D.
[email protected] | | +47 900 55 868 (NO) | www.legvoldconsulting.com www.linkedin.com/in/thor-l-legvold
Industrial-Organizational Psychologist
Helping Leaders, Teams and Organizations Find Their Own Ideal Solutions SPECIALIZING IN:

Global Organizational Development | Talent Management | 360 Assessment | Change Management Leadership & Team Effectiveness | Executive Coaching | Tailored Strategy Design and Implementation

EXPERIENCE
Director of US Operations | Boost.ai, Inc. | 01.2020 – Present Boost.ai specializes in enterprise-grade conversational artificial intelligence (AI). Inventor of the world’s most scalable conversational AI platform, Boost.ai empowers enterprises to automate customer service and internal support channels, enhance human efficiency and drive revenue with proprietary self-learning AI and a no-code solution that’s quick to deploy, easy to learn and highly scalable. • Responsible for ensuring smooth, consistent operations at all levels of the organization and alignment with policies and strategies between the US office and HQ.
• Develop an organization and culture that fits the startup we are yet will scale as we grow and expand. • Report to CEO, work alongside VP of sales to lead and develop an agile and effective US organization. • Develop the organization, it’s policies, processes, perform leadership and team development.

Senior Consultant/Regional Market Strategist | AIIR Consulting | 02.2018 – Present AIIR Consulting is a global leadership development consultancy dedicated to increasing the effectiveness and performance of leaders, teams and organizations. • Assess and coach C-Suite and senior level executives in Fortune 500 companies; design and deliver leadership development and team effectiveness programs in collaboration with stakeholders and organizational goals
• Implement and deliver on plans and manage projects, ensure that stakeholder buy-in and engagement are maintained, and that long-term behavioral change occurs • Develop team of west coast consultants to increase market share in important California business hubs, network and generate new business, participate in and lead regular colleague-based mentoring Senior Consultant | Bjørnson Organizational Psychologists | 05.2017 – Present Work with multinational corporate clients, develop 360˚ needs assessments to determine performance gaps across all levels within the organization, collaborate with stakeholders to design and implement development programs that address these challenges. Manage projects and secure stakeholder engagement, generate new business and develop new products.
• Assess and coach C-Suite level executives; diagnose, design and deliver leadership, team, and global organizational design and development to maximize leadership impact and effectiveness • Manage talent, perform change management, strategy development, facilitate conflict management, cross cultural communication and integration of geographically spread teams and locations • New business development, conduct ongoing program evaluation to ensure continual improvement, new product development
489
2 Senior Consultant | Organizational Psychologist | Assessit | 03.2015 – 03.2017 Assessit is a pan-Scandinavian consultancy specializing in executive search and selection and organizational & leadership development. I worked with private and public sector clients to improve leadership, organizational climate and culture, efficiency and profitability, as well as facilitate and develop global cross-cultural teams. • Executed Senior Executive assessments and selection. Performed coaching in private-sector firms, leadership and team development with both private- and public-sector clients nationally and internationally • Collaborated with clients to assess needs, design and implement development solutions at the leader, team and organizational level, ran assessment center programs on behalf of clients • As Project Lead, consistently mentor colleagues and manage program resources across multiple projects • Identified potential customers by networking at trade and industry gatherings, create and deliver partnership proposals tailored to customer needs and business goals • Followed up with post-program evaluation to ensure lasting client impact and explore additional partnership opportunities
• Expanded new product areas and concepts based upon research and analysis of market and industry trends • Managed the team’s client portfolio of recurrent and new business Senior Psychology Specialist | STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL | 08.2010 – 01.2015 Provided outpatient treatment of patients with various disorders, supervised less experienced staff. • Assessed patient needs, determined diagnosis and tailored treatment plans, monitored progress, reported and documented treatments and effects
• Participated in cross-disciplinary treatment team collaboration, supervised and coached non-specialist colleagues
• Obtained EMDR training and certification
Technical Director | MEMNON (SONY) | 09.2006 – 01.2010 (Management for hire) Memnon (Sony) is a local division of one of the EU’s largest digital assets management companies. • Recruited, trained and managed Engineer team; designed and equipped facilities in accordance with internationally established standards
• Established standard operating procedures for asset management based in accordance with international standards and best practices
• Partnered with third party companies, customers, and technical committees to effectively develop and implement worldwide industry standards
Consulting Organizational Psychologist | KIRKEGATE PSYKOLOGKONTOR | 03.2003 – 03.2015 Coordinated with clients in SME and startup markets to tailor development programs centered on entrepreneurship, leadership, communication, culture, diversity and inclusion, teams, and conflict management. • Provided assessment of individuals and teams with follow-up feedback and intervention tailored to client needs and assessment results, designed and conducted organizational development programs. • Organized and helmed seminars and workshops focused on identifying and addressing major industry trends and challenges, including leadership, cross-cultural and communication strategies. • Designed and delivered entrepreneurship programs to immigrants and locals, facilitated diversity and inclusion among individuals and organizations
• Concurrently managed private clinical practice
Senior Consultant/Organizational Psychologist | NORWEGIAN ROYAL MAIL | 10.2000 – 01.2003 490
3 I was part of the team of organizational psychologists who assisted the Norwegian Postal Service in reaching its goal of concurrent privatization and downsizing 1/3rd of its workforce. Large-scale OD focus. • Developed multiple programs and strategies, implementing change, crisis, and conflict-management strategies and values-based leadership to strengthen the leadership impact and organizational effectiveness during restructuring
• Achieved leadership development initiatives and stakeholder engagement via coaching and mentoring of management at all levels, balanced stakeholder objectives between owners, union and government, ensured organizational adherence to national laws and regulations • Enacted national “Inclusive Workplace” program to follow up and reduce consequences of employees on long-term leave of absense
Guest Lecturer/Professor
Served as a guest lecturer/professor on a variety of subjects for students at the graduate level for:
• Sveučilište u Zagrebu / University of Zagreb, Croatia • Universitetet i Stavanger / University of Stavanger, Norway • USC - University of Southern California, USA
• The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, USA

EDUCATION AND ACCREDITATIONS
• Bachelor of the Arts, Psychology (minor in Art) | CAL STATE NORTHRIDGE • Doctorate of Psychology | UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN, NORWAY • Post-Graduate Specialization as Industrial-Organizational Psychologist | 2008 • Red Cross Emergency Response Unit (ERU) | RED CROSS WORC, 2012 - 2018 • EMDR certified practitioner | EMDR Europe, 2014

COMPETENCIES
• Multilingual and fluent in English, Scandinavian languages (Norwegian, Swedish, Danish), both written and oral, with intermediate ability in Balkan languages (Croatian, Bosnian, Serbian), Portuguese, and French • Assessment certification in Hogan, SHL OPQ32, Cut-E batteries, JTI/MBTI, Team Effectiveness Survey, Coaching Mindset Index
• eLearning and Content Creation Systems Tools including Apple iWork, Adobe Creative Suite, AV software (Nuendo, soundBlade, Resolve, etc); familiar with R statistical analysis programming language • Microsoft Office Tools including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook • MacOS Productivity & Planning Tools including OmniPlan, Daylite, FileMaker Pro and Keynote

EXTRACURRICULARS
• Founder/Managing Director, Sonovo Mastering
Fulfilled a youthful dream of opening my own sound studio. Identified a niche in the market and established a business strategy. Increased sales by between 50-100% annually the first 5 years. Worked with top tier Norwegian and international artists, Grammy nominated 4 times, one win. Responsible for overall growth strategy, brand identity, marketing, sales. Recruited, trained and managed staff with a specific focus on bringing more women into a male-dominated industry. Took on projects as consultant to establish other studios, including choice of gear, establish routines and train employees. Presented own work on panels and seminars at international conferences. Prepared and taught university courses for graduate level students. 491
4 • Published Photographer. Have had a number of photographs published as a freelancer in multiple international publications.
• Chinese Martial Arts, have practiced and taught for over 20 years, expanded our brand from one to six clubs across Norway, plus a satellite club in the USA. Participated in and organized events and competitions. • Classic cars. Restored a vintage Maserati with my son, wrote a blog documenting it and contributed articles to the Maserati Club magazine, Viale Ciro Menotti. One of the few people who can sync and tune multiple Weber carburetors on a V8 or V12 engine.

REFERENCES
Available upon request.
492
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0502
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022

CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION

APPLICATION FEE WAIVER POLICY
(Community Development Director Jeannie Naughton)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Consider approving a resolution (Attachment 1) adopting a Historic Resources Preservation Application Fee Waiver Policy pursuant to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.53 (Historic Resources Preservation); and

2. If approved, provide staff direction as to the total number of waiver applications per fiscal year and/or the maximum dollar amount waived or direct costs to be absorbed by the City per application.

Executive Summary:

At its June 14, 2022 meeting, the City Council, by unanimous vote, directed staff to return to the August 9, 2022 meeting with a residential historic resources preservation application fee waiver policy for its consideration. This report provides an overview and draft resolution by which a Historic Resources Preservation Application Fee Waiver Policy could be implemented by the Community Development Department.

Background:

The City’s Historic Resources Preservation Ordinance, as codified in the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) Chapter 17.53 was adopted in 1998. Since that time, there have been three buildings designated or identified for protection under the City’s Historic Resources Preservation Ordinanceone Municipal facility and two privately owned non-residential properties. There have been no residential applications for protection under the City’s Historic Resources Preservation Ordinance since adoption in 1998.

The City of Hermosa Beach adopted Resolution No. 16-7045 (“Master Fee Resolution”) (Attachment 2) to establish fees and charges for certain services provided by the City and penalties for violation of certain provisions of the Municipal Code. There is no mechanism in the associated HBMC or the resolution adopting the Master Fee Schedule to waive the fees associated with an application by a City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 7 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™493
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0502
resolution adopting the Master Fee Schedule to waive the fees associated with an application by a property owner.

In 2022, the total fees associated with a historic resource nomination is $4,298.19. The application fee does not include the anticipated need to hire a third-party review by a historic preservation consultant who would review the application materials and outline the historical or architectural significance of the proposed resources. The application process may involve the review or report of a historic preservationist, architect, or similar professional(s). The report and recommendation from a historic preservation professional would serve as the basis for City Council action regarding whether the proposed resource qualifies under the ordinance criteria. Generally, the applicant would bear the cost of the third-party review. The application fees, coupled with any additional costs of a third-party review by a historic preservation professional, can be financially burdensome to residential property owners, especially those who have been in their homes for many years.

At its May 10, 2022 meeting, Mayor Mike Detoy requested that the City Council consider directing staff to bring forward an item regarding the City’s historic resources preservation program including fiscal impacts, possible waiver of fees, and any information about historical designations in Hermosa Beach. The proposed future agenda item was unanimously supported by all Councilmembers in attendance.

At its June 14, 2022 meeting, the City Council received a report which provided an overview of the historic resources preservation program, as well as the requested financial information. City Council directed staff to return to the Council with a fee waiver policy for residential properties for its consideration. Council further directed staff to take an item to the Planning Commission regarding consideration of revisions to the City’s Historic Resources Preservation Ordinance to ensure it is in line with industry standards, as part of the comprehensive zoning code update, as well as consideration of the potential participation in the Mills Act.

Past Board, Commission, and Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
December 17,1996 City Council adopted a two-year moratorium ordinance on the demolition or modification of historic and architecturally significant structures for the purpose of possible adoption of a historic preservation ordinance.

October 20, 1998 Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of the draft Hermosa Beach Preservation Ordinance (PC Resolution 98-65).

October 27, 1998 City Council approved a text amendment to the zoning ordinance adding a Hermosa Beach Preservation Ordinance (Ord. No. 98-1186). City Council adopted a resolution
establishing a list of potential historic buildings (Resolution No. 98-5937).

July 23, 2002 City Council approved the designation for the Hermosa Beach City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 7 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™494
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0502
demolition or modification of historic and architecturally significant structures for the purpose of possible adoption of a historic preservation ordinance.

October 20, 1998 Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of the draft Hermosa Beach Preservation Ordinance (PC Resolution 98-65).

October 27, 1998 City Council approved a text amendment to the zoning ordinance adding a Hermosa Beach Preservation Ordinance (Ord. No. 98-1186). City Council adopted a resolution
establishing a list of potential historic buildings (Resolution No. 98-5937).

July 23, 2002 City Council approved the designation for the Hermosa Beach Community Center at 710 Pier Avenue (City Council
Resolution 02-6216).

May 10, 2022 Under Tentative Future Agenda Items, Mayor Mike Detoy requested, and all Councilmembers in attendance supported, directing staff to bring forward an item regarding the City’s historic resources preservation program including fiscal impacts, possible waiver of fees, and any information about historical designations in Hermosa Beach.

June 14, 2022 City Council received an informational report regarding the historic resources preservation program and directed staff to return to the Council with an application fee waiver policy for residential properties for its consideration. It also directed staff to work with the Planning Commission to consider
possible revisions to the City’s Historic Resources
Preservation as part of the comprehensive zoning code
update and to consider potential participation in the Mills Act.

Discussion:

The purpose of the historic resources preservation program is to identify and ensure the long-term protection and use of local historic resources, such as buildings and structures, sites and places within the City that reflect special elements of the City's architectural, artistic, cultural, historical, political, and social heritage.

In Hermosa Beach, a historic landmark designation is for local purposes only and does not include State or National designation. The City does not currently participate in historic preservation incentive programs such as the Mills Act, which is a State program administered and implemented by local governments. Based on staff’s research, no ordinance amendment would be required for the City to execute Mills Act contracts. Staff will initiate discussions with the Planning Commission, as directed by the City Council, regarding potential participation in the Mills Act and ensure that the City’s Historic Resources Preservation Ordinance (HBMC Chapter 17.53) is in line with current industry standards, as part of the comprehensive update of the zoning code.

Once the Community Development Department has determined an application is complete, meaning City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 7 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™495
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0502
Once the Community Development Department has determined an application is complete, meaning the application is submitted with all supporting materials and all fees have been paid, no development related permits including building; alteration; demolition; removal; or relocation permits for any historic resource, improvement, building or structure relative to a proposed landmark shall be issued until a final determination regarding the proposed designation is made by City Council.

After receipt of a complete application, staff would schedule a public hearing before the City Council to study the proposed designation and to determine its eligibility and qualifications. The Council has no more than 70 days from the initial hearing date to approve, in whole or in part, or disapprove the proposed designation. Council carefully considers whether a proposed property meets the HBMC criteria for landmark designation, therefore, an application does not guarantee designation.

In recognition that payment of application fees and any additional third-party review can be financially burdensome to residential property owners, and in an effort to support qualifying applicants, staff was directed by City Council to consider providing Historic Resources Preservation application fee waiver opportunities to assist with relieving the financial burden associated with petitioning the City for the historic designation of a particular residential landmark, building, resource, or site. The City Council directed staff to consider a prima facie review, to determine if the application was likely to satisfy the application filing, review, and approval process, in determining whether the application would qualify for the respective fee waiver.

As drafted, the Historic Resources Preservation Application Fee Waiver Policy would waive, for eligible applicants, up to 100 percent of the application fees required under the Master Fee Resolution to file a Historic Resources Preservation application through a special waiver process.

Also as drafted, the City would waive up to 100 percent of the costs associated with the preparation of reports, documentation, or evidence by a suitable professional or professionals.

Typical services provided by a suitable professional(s) when reviewing applications for designations include preparation of historic assessment reports, site-specific research, and application of Federal, State, and local historical register criteria, when developing recommendations to the City Council for designation status.

Once the City Council designates a property as a historic landmark, the property is listed on the local register of landmarks and all appropriate City departments are notified so that the notice of designation is incorporated into the necessary City records. Unless otherwise exempted, HBMC Section 17.53.140 requires any modification to a property listed on the City’s register of landmarks to obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness granted by the City Council. The review process for a Certificate of Appropriateness includes a City Council evaluation of whether the proposed modifications alter any of the historic defining characteristics of the structure. As drafted, the policy would only waive fees during the application process for designation and does not propose to waive fees associated with the Certificate of Appropriateness process once the respective residential City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 7 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™496
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0502
property is listed on the local register.

With the local designation, the landmark would be able to utilize the California Historical Building Code as an alternative to complying with the building standards in HBMC Title 15, Building Code.

Typical services a suitable professional(s) would provide associated with a Certificate of Appropriateness application include design review for consistency with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Standards), provision of recommendations and conditions of approval to ensure projects are in line with the Standards, and site inspections to ensure projects are executed in accordance with City Council and staff approvals.

There are currently no staff members in the Community Development Department who possess the knowledge and/or technical expertise to provide these services, and it is therefore anticipated that for both the application for designation, as well as any projects requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness, staff would engage the services of suitable professionals to perform these activities.

Given that staff can reasonably assume that upon receipt of an application for designation, it would be necessary to engage the services of a qualified professional to assist in a prima facie review, staff would propose a period of not more than 30 days to deem an application complete or incomplete.

The Community Development Department would endeavor to exceed these timelines, especially in the case where the applicant provides substantial information as part of the application. HBMC Section 17.53 requires that a public hearing be scheduled not more than 45 days from the nomination or acceptance of a completed application for the designation of a landmark.

Staff recommends City Council consider the proposed draft resolution by which a Historic Resources Preservation Application Fee Waiver Policy could be implemented by the Community Development Department and provide direction regarding the total number of waiver applications per fiscal year and/or the maximum dollar amount waived or direct costs to be absorbed by the City per application.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Land Use Element
Goal 5. Quality and authenticity in architecture and site design in all construction and renovation of buildings.

Policy:
· 5.5 Preservation and adaptive reuse. Provide incentives for the preservation or adaptive reuse of historic structures and iconic landmarks.

Goal 10. A strong sense of cultural and architectural heritage.

Policies:
· 10.1 Historic landmarks and districts. Encourage the voluntary designation of potentially City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 7 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™497
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0502
· 10.1 Historic landmarks and districts. Encourage the voluntary designation of potentially historic resources as landmarks or historic districts.
· 10.2 Protect designated landmarks. Continue to use the Certificate of Appropriateness process for reviewing applications to demolish or alter designated landmarks. · 10.3 Public and institutional facilities. Consider the designation of potentially historic public or institutional resources under threat of demolition or deterioration. · 10.4 Historic resources as cultural tourism. Promote historic places and cultural tourism as an economic development strategy.
· 10.5 Adaptive reuse and sustainable development. Promote historic preservation as sustainable development and encourage adaptive reuse of historic or older properties. · 10.6 History and cultural heritage. Support and encourage efforts to document and share the cultural heritage and history of Hermosa Beach.
· 10.7 Culturally inclusive planning. Ensure that historic preservation planning is culturally inclusive and reflective of the unique background and diversity of neighborhoods in the city. · 10.8 Incentives and technical assistance. Provide expert technical assistance to owners of potentially eligible and designated historic properties with tools and incentives to maintain historic resources.
· 10.9 Salvage architectural features or materials. Encourage the preservation or reuse of historic architectural features on site or within the community. · 10.10 Archaeological and paleontological resources. Recognize the prehistory and history of the city and strive to identify, protect, and preserve archaeological and paleontological resources.

Fiscal Impact:

The fiscal impact of an application is reflected in the application fees, which are included in the City’s Master Fee Schedule and based directly on the cost of providing the service. In 2022, the total fees associated with a historic resource nomination is $4,298.19* and include:
· Historic Resources Review, Nomination/Application Fee $2,756; · Legal Public Hearing Noticing (300 Foot Radius) $881; · Legal Advertising in a Local Newspaper $176;
· Required Categorical Exemption of the California Environmental Quality Act $204; and · City Records Technology System Fee $281.19.
*An additional 2.75 percent processing is applied if the applicant pays by credit card.

Staff obtained information from adjacent jurisdictions that have historic preservation programs and consulted with two reputable consulting firms that provide a wide range of historic resource designation support, to better understand the costs associated with engaging the services of suitable City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 7 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™498
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0502
designation support, to better understand the costs associated with engaging the services of suitable professionals. Relevant costs for application review of residential properties in cities that do not have citywide historic resources surveys or a historic context statement, which is a report that highlights trends and patterns critical to the understanding of the built environment, range from $3,000 to $7,800. These services would include preparation of historic assessment reports, site-specific research, and application of Federal, State, and local historical register criteria, when developing recommendations to the City Council for designation status. These funds are not currently budgeted and, if the City were to decide to absorb these costs, funds would need to be transferred from Prospective Expenditures to pay the consulting firm.

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution

2. City Council Resolution No. 16-7045

3. Link to June 14, 2022 Staff Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Jeannie Naughton, Community Development Director Concur: Angela Crespi, Deputy City Manager
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 7 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™499
65270.00001\40201068.2

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, hereby finds as follows:

A. Subsidizing applications for the designation of historic landmarks within the City is in the public interest for the reasons fully set forth in Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.53.020, including: (1) to safeguard the City’s heritage by encouraging the protection of landmarks representing significant elements of its history; (2) to foster civic and neighborhood pride and a sense of identity based on an appreciation of the City’s past and the recognition and use of historic resources; (3) to enhance the visual character of the City by preserving diverse architectural styles reflecting phases of the City’s history and by encouraging complementary contemporary design and construction; (4) to strengthen the economy of the City by protecting and enhancing the City’s attractions to residents, tourists, and visitors; (5) to stabilize and improve property values within the City by recognizing historic landmarks and by protecting areas of historic buildings from encroachment by incompatible designs; (6) to promote the enjoyment and use of historic resources appropriate for the education and recreation of the people of the City; (7) to integrate the preservation of historic resources appropriate for the education and recreation of the people of the City; (8) to conserve valuable material and energy resources by ongoing use and maintenance of the existing built environment; and (9) to take whatever steps are reasonable and necessary to safeguard the property rights of owners whose property is declared to be a landmark.

B. The City of Hermosa Beach adopted Resolution No 16-7045 (“Master Fee Resolution”) to establish fees and charges for certain services provided by the City and penalties for violation of certain provisions of the Municipal Code.

RESOLUTION NO. 22-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION

APPLICATION FEE WAIVER POLICY PURSUANT TO HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.53 (HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION) OF TITLE 17 (ZONING)
500
65270.00001\40201068.2
C. Chapter 17.53 (Historic Resources Preservation) of Title 17 (Zoning) was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach on November 10, 1998 through its Ordinance No. 98-1186.

D. The purpose of the City’s Historic Resources Preservation Ordinance is to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by providing for the identification, protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of historic resources such as buildings, structures, sites, and places within the City that reflect special elements of the City’s architectural, artistic, cultural, historical, political, and social heritage.

E. Applicants with a sufficient ownership interest in a particular eligible historic resource may apply to nominate that property to become a landmark. (HBMC § 17.53.070.) The City’s Master Fee Resolution requires payment of an application fee to accompany applications for the historic designation of a site under Chapter 17.53. The application process may involve the review or report of a historic preservationist, architect, or similar professional(s). Generally, the applicant also bears the cost of this third-party professional review.

F. Payment of the above costs can be financially burdensome to residential property owners, especially those who have owned their homes for many years.

G. Waiving the costs identified in Recital E for worthy applications serves to incentivize property owners to nominate their properties as a historic resource for the benefit of the community.

H. In an effort to support qualifying applicants, the City desires to provide Historic Resources Preservation application fee waiver opportunities to assist with relieving the financial burden associated with petitioning the City for the historic designation of a particular residential landmark, building, resource, or site.

SECTION 2. This Historic Resources Preservation Application Fee Waiver Policy (the “Policy”) is intended for those eligible residential structures that are, in the sole and exclusive judgment of the City based on a prima facie review of the application materials, likely to satisfy the application filing, review, and approval process.

SECTION 3. Under the Policy, the City would waive, for eligible applicants, up to 100% of the application fee otherwise required under the Master Fee Resolution to file a Historic Resources Preservation 501
65270.00001\40201068.2
application through a special waiver process (“Waiver Applications”). In addition, the City would waive up to 100% of the costs associated with the preparation of reports, documentation, or evidence by a suitable professional(s).

SECTION 4. In order to be eligible to apply for a Waiver Application, a proposed application must meet the following generally applicable criteria:

A. The structure proposed to become a historic landmark is a residential structure; B. The structure is older than 50 years of age; and
C. The structure, after a preliminary review by City staff, is likely to satisfy the criteria for historic landmark designation under Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.53, in the sole and exclusive judgment of the City’s Community Development Department.

SECTION 5. The City will only consider a maximum of ______________ Waiver Applications per fiscal year. In addition, the maximum dollar amount waived and/or cost of application processing absorbed by the City will be $__________________ per application.

SECTION 6. The City’s Community Development Department is tasked with reviewing and determining the propriety of awarding a Waiver Application. Fee waivers may be granted when the City, through its designee(s), determines that the proposed landmark is of significant value to the community under the factors outlined in the City’s Historic Landmark Preservation Ordinance and this Policy.

SECTION 7. Subject to the requirements and criteria of this Resolution, the Community Development Department is hereby authorized to approve Waiver Applications, notwithstanding the provisions of the City’s Master Fee resolution.

SECTION 8. This Policy has no effect on the requirements, standards, procedures, and review associated with the Historic Resources Preservation Ordinance as codified under Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.53. This Policy does not create any additional right in any individual, group, or applicant. The City expressly reserves the right to modify, suspend, or terminate this Policy at any time and without warning.

SECTION 9. A certified copy of this resolution shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection.
502
65270.00001\40201068.2
SECTION 10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, shall cause the original of the same to be entered among the original resolutions of the City Council, and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the same is passed and adopted.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ____ day of __________, 2022.

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________________
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the
City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
____________________________
Myra Maravilla
City Clerk
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
City Council Hybrid Meeting
08-09-22 17:00
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
b) REPORT 22-0502 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING

A HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION APPLICATION FEE

WAIVER POLICY
(Community Development Director Jeannie Naughton)
1 0 0 0
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.

Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for b) REPORT 22-0502 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A HISTORIC RESOURCES

PRESERVATION APPLICATION FEE WAIVER POLICY
(Community Development Director Jeannie Naughton)
Overall Sentiment
Dean Francois
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 10:32am 08-09-22
Hermosa beach's historical preservation program has been neglected for quite some time.

This is evidenced by very few applications since it was initiated in the 90s.

As a former preservation commissioner, I know all too well that the process of landmark designation is cumbersome and expensive. We need to do what we can to give people an incentive to designate their properties. Property owners can benefit up to a 50% reduction in their property taxes.

The program needs a complete overhaul which would include some type of fee reduction or fee waiver. It makes sense to reduce our waive fees on a long-term property owner that may not financially benefit as much. 521
However, causing the taxpayers to spend upwards of $10,000 for each application and requiring that applications be processed by the city will cause serious budgetary problems. 522
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022

CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE INTRODUCTION ON

FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING
CHAPTER 5.80 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL

RELATING TO CANNABIS DELIVERY IN THE CITY AND
AMENDING SECTION 1.10.040 TO ADD THAT VIOLATIONS

ARE SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY PROCEDURES
(City Manager Suja Lowenthal)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Receive a report regarding cannabis delivery into the City;

2. Consider waiving full reading and introduce by title only an Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, adding Chapter 5.80 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relating to cannabis delivery into the City and amending Section 1.10.040 to add that violations of Chapter 5.80 are subject to administrative penalty procedures (Attachment 1); and

3. Provide staff with alternate or additional direction, if so desired.

Executive Summary:

Cannabis businesses are currently prohibited in Hermosa Beach. An initiative has qualified for the November 8, 2022 ballot that would allow retail cannabis in the City. The Council voted to place a measure on the ballot to add Chapter 3.48 to Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, establishing a tax on cannabis businesses operating within the City of Hermosa Beach should they be allowed to do so. As directed, staff presents this item to allow Council to consider an amendment to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) to allow delivery of cannabis into the City from businesses located outside the City.

Background:

State and City Law Governing Medical Cannabis
In 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215, entitled the Compassionate Use Act, the intent of which was to enable persons who are in need of medical marijuana to use it City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™523
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
without fear of prosecution under limited, specified circumstances.

In 2004, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (referred to as the Medical Marijuana Program) to clarify the scope of Proposition 215 and to provide qualifying patients and primary caregivers who cultivate marijuana with a limited defense to certain specified State criminal statutes. Assembly Bills 2650 (2010) and 1300 (2011) amended the Medical Marijuana Program to expressly recognize the authority of counties and cities to “[a]dopt local ordinances that regulate the location, operation, or establishment of a medical marijuana cooperative or collective” and to civilly and criminally enforce such ordinances.

In 2013, in City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that “[n]othing in the [Compassionate Use Act] or the [Medical Marijuana Program] expressly or impliedly limits the inherent authority of a local jurisdiction, by its own ordinances, to regulate the use of its land….” Additionally, in Maral v. City of Live Oak, the Court of Appeal affirmed the ability of local government entities to prohibit the cultivation of marijuana under its land-use authority, holding that “there is no right - and certainly no constitutional right - to cultivate medical marijuana….”
On October 9, 2015, Governor Brown signed three bills into law - Assembly Bills 266 and 243, and Senate Bill 643 - collectively referred to as the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act (“MMRSA”). Prior to the passage of the MMRSA, State law provided no legal mechanism for commercial cultivation of marijuana for medicinal purposes and Federal law prohibited all cultivation of marijuana. Until the MMRSA was passed, cultivation of marijuana for medicinal purposes in California was restricted to individual qualified patients or their primary care givers for noncommercial purposes and limited to personal quantities. The MMRSA became effective on January 1, 2016 and contained provisions to govern the cultivating, processing, transporting, testing, and distributing of medical marijuana to qualified patients. The MMRSA also contained statutory provisions that:
• Set up a “dual licensing” scheme which requires dispensaries and cultivators to obtain a local license prior to requesting and obtaining a license from the State; no dispensary or cultivation activity may lawfully operate without both a State and local license; • Allow the City to completely prohibit the delivery of marijuana by requiring a local government that wishes to prevent marijuana delivery activity from operating within the local government’s boundaries to enact an ordinance affirmatively banning such delivery activity (see Business & Professions Code § 19340(a));
• Preserves the ability of a qualified patient and/or primary caregiver to cultivate for personal, non-commercial purposes, sets new limits on such cultivation, and excepts such personal cultivation from State cultivation licensing requirements. Furthermore, the MMRSA allows local City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™524
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
cultivation from State cultivation licensing requirements. Furthermore, the MMRSA allows local governments to enact ordinances expressing their intent to prohibit the cultivation of marijuana and their intent not to administer a conditional permit program for the cultivation of marijuana (see Health & Safety Code § 11362.777(c)(4));
• Expressly provide that the MMRSA does not supersede or limit local law enforcement activity, enforcement of local ordinances, or enforcement of local permit or licensing requirements regarding marijuana (see Bus. & Prof. Code § 19315(a)); and • Expressly provide that the MMRSA does not limit the authority or remedies of a local government under any provision of law regarding marijuana, including but not limited to local governments’ right to make and enforce within its limits all police regulations not in conflict with general laws (see Bus. & Prof. Code § 19316(c)).

The MMRSA, however, also stated that if a city or county had not adopted land use regulations by March 1, 2016, to either regulate or ban cultivation of marijuana for medicinal purposes, the State would become the sole authority to issue cultivation licenses in that jurisdiction, meaning no local license would be required.

At its March 8, 2016 meeting, City Council adopted Ordinance 16-1362 amending sections 17.42.110 and 17.26.030 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) to expressly prohibit all commercial medical marijuana uses in the City, cannabis deliveries to any location within the city, and prohibit cultivation for medical use by a qualified patient or primary caregiver. This ordinance codified the long -standing rule that since cannabis uses were not listed as a permitted use in the HBMC, medical marijuana uses were not permitted in the City.

State and City Law Governing Recreational Cannabis
On November 8, 2016, Proposition 64 was adopted for adult use of marijuana act (AUMA). In addition to other items, AUMA regulated the use of marijuana for personal and commercial purposes, including the recreational use of marijuana by adults over 21 years of age. Ultimately, AUMA expanded the permissions under MMRSA. Proposition 64 retains the local control that was clarified by the courts whereby cities can determine whether to allow or prohibit commercial cannabis activity in its jurisdiction and under what terms those uses would be permitted. Cities throughout California rushed to adopt local ordinances by January 1, 2018. Without a local ordinance specifying what activities were permitted or prohibited, a valid State license would be the only requirement to open and operate any commercial marijuana business in any commercial zone in the City.

At its November 28, 2017 meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance 17-1380 amending Title 17 of the HBMC to expressly prohibit all commercial cannabis activities in the City and prohibit outdoor cannabis cultivation for personal use. A person may cultivate no more than six living cannabis plants City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™525
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
inside a private residence in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 11362.2.

Current State law allows qualified patients and their caregivers to cultivate and possess cannabis for personal use in order to treat certain medical conditions. It also allows the personal possession and use of recreational cannabis. However, cities retain their authority to reasonably regulate the business of cultivating, processing, and selling cannabis and related products. The sale of cannabis for any purpose is currently prohibited in the City of Hermosa Beach.

State and City Law Governing Cannabis Delivery
The Bureau of Cannabis Control (now the Department of Cannabis Control) adopted California Code of Regulations, title 16, section 5416, subdivision (d), allowing delivery statewide. Regulation 5416 (d) can arguably be interpreted to mean that delivery of cannabis goods is authorized in any city within California, regardless of whether the city regulates or bans deliveries within its borders. Most recently, the litigation challenging this regulation as violative of AUMA was dismissed as not ripe for adjudication because the court found the Bureau’s regulation did not conflict with a city’s right to control or ban delivery. Delivery and transport of commercial cannabis remains an open issue yet to be fully resolved by the legislature or the courts.

A local jurisdiction cannot ban transport of cannabis on public roads. However, delivery of cannabis must comply with local law. Accordingly, the most consensus position on this issue among cities (and that put out by the League of California Cities City Attorney’s Department Cannabis Regulation Committee) is that cities may ban or regulate deliveries within their borders. However, cities cannot prevent a delivery service from using public roads to pass through its jurisdiction.

Recent Local Cannabis Discussions and Decisions
On November 17, 2021, the Hermosa Beach City Clerk received a petition from the cannabis industry for the purposes of adopting an initiative that would repeal Hermosa Beach’s existing ban on all commercial cannabis business operations and allow commercial cannabis operations in the City. The initiative measure does not include a tax on cannabis. At City Council’s regular meeting on November 23, 2021, Mayor Detoy requested, and a unanimous vote of the City Council supported, directing staff to place on the next regular session agenda an item addressing the City’s options.

At its December 14, 2021 meeting, City Council directed the City Manager to form an Advisory Group to explore policy issues and provide City Council with input on whether the City’s current ban on cannabis business operations should be modified. The group held a total of six public meetings and at its sixth and final meeting on March 29, 2022, the Cannabis Advisory Group participated in a final voting process regarding its support of key policy issues and options of the City Council.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™526
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
A majority of the group indicated that they felt there is currently adequate access to legal cannabis.

When asked if Hermosa Beach should lift the ban on cannabis delivery, a majority of the group indicated yes, but did not support that delivery being based within the City. The group’s final report and recommendations were presented to the City Council at its April 12, 2022 meeting.

At its March 22, 2022 meeting, the City Clerk reported to the Council that the initiative petition had acquired sufficient signatures to qualify for the ballot. The City Council opted not to adopt the initiative by ordinance but as required by law, to instead submit the ordinance, without alteration, to the voters in the November 8, 2022 Municipal Election.

At its May 24, 2022 meeting, City Council voted to oppose the industry-sponsored initiative. Council also directed staff to bring to Council for its consideration an ordinance allowing delivery of cannabis from outside the City and a measure that would impose a tax on cannabis businesses, should they be permitted in the City. State law requires any new local taxes to be approved by the voters (Proposition 218).

At its July 26, 2022 meeting, City Council adopted a resolution calling for the placement of a measure on the ballot for the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election for the submission to the qualified voters of an ordinance adding Chapter 3.44 to Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, establishing a tax on cannabis businesses operating within the City of Hermosa Beach should the initiative pass or the Council allow delivery at any time in the future.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
March 8, 2016 (Regular
Meeting)
City Council adopted Ordinance 16-1362 amending sections

17.42.110 and 17.26.030 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal
Code (HBMC) to expressly prohibit all commercial medical marijuana uses in the City and prohibiting cultivation for medical use by a qualified patient or primary caregiver.

November 28, 2017
(Regular Meeting)
City Council adopted Ordinance 17 -1380 amending Title 17 of the HBMC to expressly prohibit all commercial cannabis activities in the City and prohibit outdoor cannabis cultivation for personal use.

November 23, 2021
(Regular Meeting)
Under Future Agenda Items, Mayor Detoy requested City
Council consider directing staff to place on the December 14, 2021 agenda an item addressing the City’s options in light of the cannabis industry initiative filed with the City Clerk. The request was supported by a unanimous vote of the City
Council.

December 14, 2021
(Regular Meeting)
City Council directed the City Manager to form an Advisory Group, subject to the Brown Act, to explore policy issues and provide City Council with input on whether the City’s current ban on cannabis business operations should be modified.

Mh 222022 (RlCitCil td t tdt thbiidtiititi
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™527
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
March 8, 2016 (Regular
Meeting)
City Council adopted Ordinance 16-1362 amending sections

17.42.110 and 17.26.030 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal
Code (HBMC) to expressly prohibit all commercial medical marijuana uses in the City and prohibiting cultivation for medical use by a qualified patient or primary caregiver.

November 28, 2017
(Regular Meeting)
City Council adopted Ordinance 17 -1380 amending Title 17 of the HBMC to expressly prohibit all commercial cannabis activities in the City and prohibit outdoor cannabis cultivation for personal use.

November 23, 2021
(Regular Meeting)
Under Future Agenda Items, Mayor Detoy requested City
Council consider directing staff to place on the December 14, 2021 agenda an item addressing the City’s options in light of the cannabis industry initiative filed with the City Clerk. The request was supported by a unanimous vote of the City
Council.

December 14, 2021
(Regular Meeting)
City Council directed the City Manager to form an Advisory Group, subject to the Brown Act, to explore policy issues and provide City Council with input on whether the City’s current ban on cannabis business operations should be modified.

March 22, 2022 (Regular
Meeting)
City Council opted not to adopt the cannabis industry initiative by ordinance and instead submit the ordinance, without
alteration, to the voters in the November 8, 2022 Municipal Election.

April 12, 2022 (Regular
Meeting)
City Council received and discussed t he final report and recommendations of the Cannabis Advisory Group.

May 24, 2022 (Regular
Meeting)
City Council action to oppose the cannabis industry -
sponsored initiative filed with the City Clerk on November 17, 2021. Council also directed staff to brin g to Council for its consideration an ordinance allowing delivery of cannabis from outside the City and a measure that would impose a tax on cannabis businesses, should they be permitted in the City.

July 26, 2022 (Regular
Meeting)
City Council adopted a resolution calling for the placement of a measure on the ballot for the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election for the submission to the qualified voters of an ordinance adding Chapter 3.44 to Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, establishing a tax on cannabis businesses operating within the City of City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™528
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
July 26, 2022 (Regular
Meeting)
City Council adopted a resolution calling for the placement of a measure on the ballot for the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election for the submission to the qualified voters of an ordinance adding Chapter 3.44 to Title 3 (Revenue and Finance) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, establishing a tax on cannabis businesses operating within the City of Discussion:

The City of Hermosa Beach currently prohibits all commercial cannabis activity in the City, including the delivery of cannabis from outside the City. As directed, staff presents this item to allow Council to consider an amendment to the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) to allow delivery of cannabis into the City. The draft ordinance (Attachment 1) would add Chapter 5.80 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relating to cannabis delivery in the City and amend Section 1.10.040 to add that violations of Chapter 5.80 would be subject to administrative penalty procedures. As drafted, the ordinance would allow cannabis delivery as generally described below:
· Delivery activities would be limited to operators with physical locations outside of the City and may take place only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.; · Entities must be licensed and conform to all relevant legal standards and impose operational requirements to ensure health, safety, and welfare; and · Entities must apply for, and be granted, a cannabis delivery use permit subject to standards that eliminate or minimize to the extent possible any associated impacts.

The City Manager would review any application for a cannabis delivery permit accompanied by the application fee adopted by City Council and only issue a permit if all the required findings are supported by substantial evidence as described in detail in the draft ordinance. Once issued, cannabis delivery permit holders would be required to comply with all applicable State and local laws and tax requirements and maintain detailed books and records.

Under the terms of the draft ordinance, the City Manager would be authorized to establish any additional rules, regulations, and standards governing the issuance, denial, or renewal of cannabis delivery permits, the ongoing operations of a cannabis delivery permit holder and the City’s oversight, or concerning any other subject determined necessary. Any decision by the City Manager could be appealed to the City Council.

Staff recommends City Council consider and provide feedback regarding the draft ordinance (Attachment 1). Should Council choose to introduce the ordinance, staff would return to Council with an amendment to the City’s Master Fee Schedule establishing an annual cannabis delivery permit fee and establishing a fine. Staff would also bring an item before the Planning Commission to make minor modifications to the Zoning Code for consistency.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™529
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485
Should City Council choose not to introduce the ordinance and the industry initiative be passed by the voters in the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, the delivery of cannabis products would be permitted exclusively by the retail businesses located in the City unless otherwise required by State law.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Governance Element
Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.

Policy:
· 1.1 Open Meetings. Maintain the community’s trust by holding meetings in which decisions are being made, that are open and available for all community members to attend, participate, or view remotely.

Goal 2. The Community is active and engaged in decision-making processes.

Policy:
· 2.3 Public participation guidelines. Establish parameters and guidelines to ensure public participation is promoted through diverse methods
Fiscal Impact:

Fiscal impacts associated with lifting the ban on cannabis delivery in the City would include staff time for review and issuance of a cannabis delivery permit. If approved, staff would return to Council with a proposed amendment to the City’s Master Fee Schedule to add an annual cannabis delivery permit fee, as well as to establish a fine for violation of the requirements. If passed by the voters in the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, the City would be allowed to tax the gross sales of cannabis delivery activities.

Attachments:

1. Draft Ordinance

2. Link to March 8, 2016 City Council Staff Report

3. Link to November 28, 2017 City Council Staff Report

4. Link to November 23, 2021 City Council Agenda

5. Link to December 14, 2021 City Council Staff Report
City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™530
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0485

6. Link to March 22, 2022 City Council Staff Report

7. Link to April 12, 2022 City Council Staff Report

8. Link to May 24, 2022 City Council Staff Report

9.. Link to July 26, 2022 City Council Staff Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Angela Crespi, Deputy City Manager Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 9 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™531
ORDINANCE NO. ___

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH ADDING CHAPTER 5.80 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH

MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CANNABIS DELIVERY IN THE CITY, AMENDING SECTION 1.10.040 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL

CODE TO ADD THAT VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER ARE SUBJECT

TO ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY PROCEDURES AND FINDING THE

SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach does hereby ordain as follows:

Section 1. Findings
A. The City currently prohibits all commercial cannabis activity in the City, including the cannabis delivery.

B. While this amendment will not permit commercial cannabis activity in the City at static physical locations (i.e., storefronts, warehouses, etc.), the purpose of this amendment is to allow the delivery of cannabis into the City by licensed entities that conform to all relevant legal standards and impose operational requirements to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City.

C. It is the City’s intent to permit cannabis delivery subject to a use permit to ensure the safe delivery to City residents subject to standards that eliminate or minimize to the extent possible any impacts associated with the delivery of cannabis into the City.

Section 2. Chapter 5.80 (Cannabis delivery) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:

A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, this Chapter shall govern and regulate cannabis delivery in the City. To the extent there are any other provisions of this code in conflict with this Chapter, this Chapter shall prevail.

B. Cannabis delivery is permitted in the city by operators with physical locations located outside of the city, subject to the issuance of a cannabis delivery permit and the requirements of this chapter. No person shall deliver cannabis anywhere in the City unless a cannabis delivery permit has been obtained in compliance with this chapter and in compliance with all legal requirements.

1. The City Manager shall review any application for a cannabis delivery permit and associated documents and shall require, if deemed necessary at the sole discretion of the City Manager, additional information to complete the application. 532
The City Manager shall only issue a cannabis delivery permit if all of the required findings are supported by substantial evidence in the application.

2. An application for a cannabis delivery permit shall be accompanied by the application fee adopted by resolution of the City Council and shall comply with all application requirements as determined by the City Manager and include, at a minimum the following:
(a) The name, mailing address and contact information of the applicant. (b) The physical address and assessor’s parcel number(s) of the property upon which the applicant conducts the commercial cannabis activity that will be the location where deliveries originate.
(c) Copies of any required State and local license to conduct commercial cannabis activity. This includes any state or local licenses for the physical retail location (or non-retail location) that must be located outside of the city. (d) If the Applicant is a business entity or any form of entity, information regarding the entity, including, without limitation, the name and address of the entity, its legal status, and proof of registration with, or a certificate of good standing from, the California Secretary of State, as applicable. (e) The full name, date of birth, present address and telephone number for all owners, supervisors, employees, and those with a financial interest in the applicant that is the subject of the application at the time of application submittal.

In the event an applicant is an entity, each entity must disclose the owners or those with a financial interest in the entity until an individual person(s) is/are named. (f) List of names and a copy of a California driver’s license for any individual eligible to conduct cannabis delivery in the City at the time of application. (g) List of all vehicles (make, model and license plate number) of any vehicle that eligible to conduct cannabis delivery in the City. (h) Employee educational and training plan to ensure that all employees are informed and educated to all of the requirements of this Chapter and applicable state law requirements for cannabis delivery in the city.

4. The City Manager shall only issue a cannabis delivery permit if all of the following findings are made based on substantial evidence:
(a) Applicant is licensed by all relevant governmental entities and has demonstrated a capability to comply with all cannabis laws and regulations. (b) Applicant has been truthful and made no material misrepresentations in its application.
533
(c) Applicant has paid all application fees and has no outstanding fines, penalties or other unpaid enforcement obligations of any kind. (d) Applicant does not have any previous civil, administrative or legal judgments or history of moral turpitude or other activities of a fraudulent or felonious nature that would indicate applicant is not suited to operate a cannabis delivery business in the City in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. (e) Each delivery vehicle shall be equipped with a dual dash camera system showing the inside of the vehicle as well as a forward facing camera and shall be turned on at all time the vehicle is in the City making cannabis deliveries. Video footage shall be retained for a period of at least two (2) weeks and made available to the City upon request.

Notwithstanding the above, the City reserves the right to reject any or all applications for a cannabis delivery permit for any reason that the renders the applicant unfit to operate conduct cannabis delivery in the City. The city further reserves the right to request and obtain additional information from any applicant submitting an application.

5. Any cannabis delivery permit holder must comply with the following:
(a) Each cannabis delivery permit holder must comply with all applicable State and local laws and regulations as amended.
(b) Each cannabis delivery permit holder shall maintain accurate books and records, detailing the revenues and expenses of the business it does in the city. (c) Each cannabis delivery permit holder shall maintain a current register of names and required information for all employees participating in the delivery of cannabis in the city and all vehicles used for the delivery of cannabis in the city. In no event shall any employee participate in the delivery of cannabis in the city or a vehicle be used for the delivery of cannabis in the city until the information is updated to the permit holder’s register. Each cannabis delivery permit holder shall provide the City its current register upon request by the City within forty-eight (48) hours.
(d) Each cannabis delivery permit holder must pay all applicable federal, state and local taxes as amended from time to time.
(e) Each cannabis delivery permit holder shall provide the City Manager, and keep current, with the name, telephone number(s) (mobile preferred, if available) of an owner and or manager to whom can be reached 24 hours a day. (f) Cannabis delivery is only permitted in the city between the hours of 8:00 am to 10:00pm.
534
(g) Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by the City at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the cannabis delivery permit holder.
(h) Automobile Liability Coverage. Cannabis delivery permit holders shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the cannabis delivery permit holder arising out of or in connection with cannabis delivery in the City, including coverage for owned, hired, and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence

6. Each cannabis delivery permit holder shall maintain accurate books and records, detailing all of the revenues and expenses of all cannabis delivery in the city. On no less than an annual basis, or at any time upon reasonable request of the city, each cannabis delivery permit holder shall file a sworn statement detailing the number of sales by the cannabis delivery permit holder during the previous twelve-month period (or shorter period based upon the timing of the request), provided on a monthly basis. The statement shall also include gross sales for each month, and all applicable taxes paid or due to be paid. If, upon written request from the City, each cannabis delivery permit holder shall make available to the City all books, records, accounts, inventory and access to onsite operations of persons engaged in cannabis delivery specific to the business, including examination of both state and federal income tax returns, sales tax returns, or other evidence documenting the finances pertaining to cannabis delivery in the City for the purpose of verifying compliance with this Chapter and any other applicable provision of this Code.

7. An application for renewal of a cannabis delivery permit shall be filed at least sixty (60) calendar days prior to the expiration date of the current permit. The renewal application shall contain all the information required for new applications and the applicant shall pay a renewal application fee in an amount set by the City Council. An application for renewal of a cannabis delivery permit shall be rejected by the City Manager if any of the following exists:
(a) The application is filed less than sixty (60) days before its expiration. (b) The cannabis delivery permit is suspended or revoked at the time of the application.
(c) The cannabis delivery permit has not been in regular and continuous operation in the four (4) months prior to the renewal application. 535
(d) The cannabis delivery permit holder has failed to conform to the requirements of this Chapter, or of any regulations adopted pursuant to this Chapter.
(e) The permittee fails or is unable to renew its State of California license or other applicable local licenses.
(f) If the City or state has determined, based on substantial evidence, that the permittee is in violation of the requirements of this Chapter, of the City’s Municipal Code, or of the state rules and regulations, and the City or state has determined that the violation is grounds for termination or revocation of the cannabis delivery permit.

If a renewal application is rejected, a person may file a new application pursuant to this Chapter no sooner than one (1) year from the date of the rejection.

8. In addition to any regulations adopted by the City Council, the City Manager is authorized to establish any additional rules, regulations, and standards governing the issuance, denial, or renewal of cannabis delivery permits, the ongoing operations of a cannabis delivery permit holder and the City’s oversight, or concerning any other subject determined to be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Chapter. Regulations shall be published on the City’s website. Regulations promulgated by the City Manager shall become effective upon date of publication.

A cannabis delivery permit holder shall be required to comply with all state and local laws and regulations, including but not limited to any rules, regulations, or standards adopted by the City Manager or his designee.

9. The person or members of a business entity to whom a cannabis delivery permit is issued pursuant to this Chapter shall be responsible for all violations of the laws of the State of California or of the regulations and/or the ordinances of the city, whether committed by the permittee or any employee or agent of the permittee, which violations occur in the city whether or not said violations occur within the permit holder’s presence.

10. In addition to the violation section of this Chapter as well as any other enforcement mechanism authorized by the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code or State law, violations of this subsection (C) of this Chapter shall be subject to suspension or revocation of the cannabis delivery permit.

11. Any decision by the City Manager under this chapter (including, but not limited to, the initial decision on an application, renewal decision, and a decision to suspend or revoke a cannabis delivery permit) may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be filed in writing, with the city clerk’s office no later than fifteen (15) days after the City Manager’s decision and an appeal fee must be included. The city council shall conduct a public hearing within sixty (60) days of the date the appeal is submitted and issue it decision within sixty (60) days of the closing of the hearing, unless extended at the sole discretion of the city council. 536
G. Violations and Remedies.

1. Violations of the provisions of this chapter are subject to the administrative penalty provisions of Chapter 1.10.

Section 3. Section 1.10.040 (Code violations subject to administrative penalty procedures) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to add subsection (A)((25) to read as follows:

25. Chapter 5.80, Cannabis delivery.

Section 4. The City Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance is not a “project” under California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), because the ordinance will allow for the establishment of cannabis delivery to operate in a similar manner as traditional delivery services which will not cause a direct physical change in the environment nor a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (Public Resources Code section 21065.) Further, the City Council finds that even if this ordinance is found to be a project under CEQA, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from environmental review under pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The ordinance permits cannabis delivery in the city which businesses will have impacts similar to delivery services which are already authorized within the City. Furthermore, the Ordinance contains operational requirements that prevent any potential impacts on the environment that may be unique to businesses involving cannabis. Further, there is no possibility that this Ordinance would create cumulative impacts that are significant and there are no other significant impacts that could occur as a result of this Ordinance, and there are no unusual circumstances that would cause any such significant impacts
Section 5. Pursuant to California Government Code section 36937, this ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final passage.

Section 6. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of Hermosa Beach’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this __th day of _________________, 2022 VOTE: AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
537
_______________________________________
MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, California
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
City Attorney
538
City Council Hybrid Meeting
08-09-22 17:00
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
c) REPORT 22-0485 CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE

INTRODUCTION ON

FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING
CHAPTER 5.80 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL

RELATING TO CANNABIS DELIVERY IN THE CITY AND
AMENDING SECTION 1.10.040 TO ADD THAT VIOLATIONS

ARE SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY PROCEDURES
(City Manager Suja Lowenthal)
20 0 18 2
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.

Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for c) REPORT 22-0485 CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE INTRODUCTION ON

FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADDING
CHAPTER 5.80 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL

RELATING TO CANNABIS DELIVERY IN THE CITY AND
AMENDING SECTION 1.10.040 TO ADD THAT VIOLATIONS

ARE SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY PROCEDURES
(City Manager Suja Lowenthal)
Overall Sentiment
Dean Francois
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 10:17am 08-09-22
The staff report fails to recognize that the cannabis advisory group recommended this by only one vote. This was 539
a split decision.

The staff report does not give any explanation why the staff and the advisory group is recommending this.

I have continued to testify about the need for transparency in city government and this is an example. One would expect a report to concisely define the advantages and disadvantages of taking an action and the revenue shortfalls or revenue potentials of such action.

This recommendation should be rejected.

When I get elected to this city council I will make sure our staff reports are complete, and ensure transparency, so that city councils and the public are fully informed of city business.

Michael Treidl
Location: 90254
Submitted At: 10:07am 08-09-22
I am oppose to cannabis in Hermosa Beach, including both delivery and brick and mortar stores. At the very least this should be decided by voters in November. Why the rush? Ingrid Jodele
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 9:07am 08-09-22
I don't want more potheads. We have enough. Let's protect our youth instead of promoting drugs.

Lee Schantz
Location:

Submitted At: 7:45am 08-09-22
I strongly oppose any efforts prior to the November elections to legalize Cannabis deliveries in Hermosa Beach.

Any decision on cannabis should be made by the residents, not by 3 council members. jamie stockley
Location:

Submitted At: 5:43pm 08-08-22
This initiative should be decided by the voters and not a rush decision made by a select few.

Peter Michel
Location: 90274, Palos Verdes Peninsula
Submitted At: 2:46pm 08-08-22
What is the RUSH for allowing Cannabis Delivery in Hermosa Beach? The vôters should have the right to decide in the November Election to Allow or Not Allow CANNABIS DELIVERY IN THR CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH.

Alice Bohlinger
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 2:43pm 08-08-22
Please do not rush a decision to legalize any sort of marijuana dispensary or delivery into Hermosa Beach. I know many residents are not in agreement. Let’s wait and let the people decide on the November ballot. Thank you!
Kristina O'Brien
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 2:00pm 08-08-22
No thank you! Please hold off on this until the people can vote in November. Please, let’s keep Hermosa drug free (smell free) community where we can raise our children not living in fear. No to drugs. No to changing our city for 540
money. Let’s not become a Venice. KEEP HERMOSA HERMOSA!!!! Do it for the kids! Thank you! Joanna Anderson
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 1:50pm 08-08-22
Legalizing cannabis delivery in our small family friendly town should be decided by the voters in November, hold off on this important issue until then.

Rebekah Barrios
Location: 90254-4316, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 1:02pm 08-08-22
I think we should hold off until November and voters can be heard.

Joseph Swan
Location:

Submitted At: 7:08am 08-08-22
Any change in the city's current ban on cannabis sales, whether through brick-and-mortar retail shops or through delivery, should be approved by the voters through the initiative process. I strongly oppose doing this by city ordinance.

Christy Robinson
Location:

Submitted At: 6:19am 08-08-22
Please wait for the November vote! It is up to the Hermosa Beach citizens to decide Dori Medina
Location:

Submitted At: 4:30am 08-08-22
Let the voters decide in November. There are too many items that get passed by those in gov't, which is basically taking away the rights of the voters to make decisions that affect our cities. A decision of this kind affects all the cities in the South Bay area and beyond. Stop dictating what should happen and give these important rights back to the citizens who live in this area.

Karen Buchhagen
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 12:01am 08-08-22
Voters must decide whether or not cannabis delivery should be legalized in Our November election, not two random and unauthorized councilmen.

Tracy H
Location:

Submitted At: 9:27pm 08-07-22
I am opposed to legalizing cannabis delivery.

Scott Binder
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 6:32pm 08-07-22
Let the citizens of Hermosa Beach decide in November. What’s the rush? This needs to be an inclusive fair decision made by the people.

Linda Hanson
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 6:24pm 08-07-22
What's the hurry? Let the citizens of Hermosa decide. We don't need this town regressing to what it was in the not so distant past. As citizens of HB we have worked hard to make our little city a clean and safe place for 541
everyone. Don't turn this into Venice-South!!!
Vicki Garcia
Location: 90254
Submitted At: 6:10pm 08-07-22
Wait for the November vote. It is up to citizens to decide.

Carolyn Petty
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 5:34pm 08-07-22
Why the RUSH to legalize cannabis deliveries NOW in advance of the November election? This ordinance, proposed by Councilmembers Massey and Ray Jackson (up for re-election) is unnecessary and potentially usurping the will of the Hermosa Beach voters. The answer for them is that it is much easier to get 3 votes (the 3rd vote being Councilmember Campbell) rather than wait for input from THOUSANDS of voters in November. If it is the will of the voters to legalize dispensaries (although clearly I am against this), then cannabis delivery will become legal in Hermosa Beach anyway, rendering this entire discussion a waste of everyone’s time.

I want to point out to everyone that the decision maker granting licenses will be the City Manager, who continues to demonstrate that she does not have the best interests of our city in mind. There will be no public hearings, no commission input and no community input. It will all rest on what the City Manager decides.

There will be no LIMIT on the number of licenses granted – how is this responsible? The answer is that it is not.

Bizarrely, the staff report points out that this is consistent with our general plan. Crime is associated with these delivery vehicles. Read here:
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=marijuana+delivery+robbery&qpvt=marijuana+delivery+robbery&FORM= VDRE
Or just google “Cannabis Delivery Vehicle crime”, and a litany of criminal incidents will appear. Unfortunately, Councilmember Jackson wants these delivery companies to “come out of the shadows”. His own words. Really? Is this really in the best interest of our community to ensure these delivery vehicles are openly driving through our neighborhoods?
The answer is No. Let the community decide in November. Councilmembers are elected to represent the community, not their own personal interests. This entire discussion of legalizing delivery in advance of November disrespects the community and the process.

Heidi J. Swan
Location:

Submitted At: 5:32pm 08-07-22
Why not wait until November and let the voters decide!? This is a huge decision. Overturning the ban on legal deliveries should be up to the RESIDENTS. Will legalizing marijuana delivery reduce our risk for an increase in crime? Will overturning our ban keep us more safe? NO. It will only increase the risk for innocent people to be harmed. Imagine a robbery of a delivery driver in our small town. Our small streets. Where are there not children on foot and on bikes? This is not a benign proposition! https://patch.com/california/palmdesert/cannabis-delivery-driver-robbed-gunpoint-2-arrested-dhs-cops https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/cannabis-delivery-driver-robbed-at-gunpoint-in-martinez/ https://www.yourcentralvalley.com/news/local-news/cannabis-delivery-driver-robbed-in-fresno-policesay/#:~:text=FRESNO%2C%20Calif.,Bulldog%20Avenue%20and%209th%20Street. https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2021/02/27/4-arrested-in-carjackings-of-pot-delivery-vans-in-pasadena/ 542
543
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0487
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022

RULES GOVERNING THE SUBMITTAL OF

REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE
NOVEMBER 8, 2022 BALLOT MEASURES
(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council consider whether to sign the rebuttal arguments corresponding to the four ballot measures or to yield its signature to another person using the Authorization for Another Person to Sign Rebuttal Argument Form (Attachment 1).

Executive Summary:

At its July 26, 2022 meeting, City Council voted to author the Arguments in Favor of the ballot measures pertaining to a Sales Tax, Cannabis Tax, and the Civil Service Ordinance Repeal and to author the Argument Against the ballot measure pertaining to the Cannabis Initiative. Staff recommends City Council consider whether to sign the rebuttal arguments corresponding to the four ballot measures or to yield its signature to another person using the Authorization for Another Person to Sign Rebuttal Argument Form (Attachment 1).

Background:

At its July 26, 2022 meeting, City Council authorized its members to author arguments pertaining to the four ballot measures to be submitted to the voters at the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election. Per California Elections Code Section 9282 and 9287, City Council was given priority to author these arguments. The authors were authorized as follows:

Ballot Measure and Argument Authors
Sales Tax - Argument in Favor Mayor Detoy and Councilmember Massey Cannabis Initiative - Argument Against Mayor Detoy and Mayor Pro Tem Jackson Cannabis Tax - Argument in Favor Councilmember Massey and Councilmember Campbell
Civil Service Ordinance Repeal -
Argument in Favor
Mayor Detoy and Mayor Pro Tem Jackson
City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 5 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™544
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0487
Ballot Measure and Argument Authors
Sales Tax - Argument in Favor Mayor Detoy and Councilmember Massey Cannabis Initiative - Argument Against Mayor Detoy and Mayor Pro Tem Jackson Cannabis Tax - Argument in Favor Councilmember Massey and Councilmember Campbell
Civil Service Ordinance Repeal -
Argument in Favor
Mayor Detoy and Mayor Pro Tem Jackson
Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
July 26, 2022 (Regular
Meeting)
The City Council voted to author the arguments in favor of the Sales Tax, Cannabis Tax, and Civil Service Ordinance Repeal and the Argument Against the Cannabis Initiative.

Discussion:

The approved ballot questions for the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election will read as follows:

To maintain Hermosa Beach’s long-term financial stability with locally controlled funds, to be used for programs such as public safety/911 response, enforcement against theft/property crime; street/pothole repair; protection of beach and coastal waters; support for school safety; cleaning of public areas; retention/attraction of local businesses; homeless services and for general governmental use; shall an ordinance be adopted establishing a ¾¢ sales tax requiring public spending disclosure/independent audits, generating approximately $3,000,000 annually until ended by voters?
YES
NO
Shall an ordinance proposed by initiative petition be adopted that repeals the City’s existing ban on cannabis businesses and allows by Cityapproved permit up to two cannabis retail storefront businesses, including home delivery from those stores?
YES
NO
Shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a local business tax on cannabis/hemp businesses up to $20.00 per square foot for cultivation and up to 10% of gross receipts for all other cannabis/hemp businesses, estimated to generate $700,000 - $1,500,000 annually (assuming two retail stores operating and taxed at maximum rate), until ended by voters, for general governmental use, subject to independent audits, to be effective only if cannabis business operations are allowed in the City? YES
NO City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 8/4/2022 powered by Legistar™545
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0487
Shall an ordinance be adopted enacting a local business tax on cannabis/hemp businesses up to $20.00 per square foot for cultivation and up to 10% of gross receipts for all other cannabis/hemp businesses, estimated to generate $700,000 - $1,500,000 annually (assuming two retail stores operating and taxed at maximum rate), until ended by voters, for general governmental use, subject to independent audits, to be effective only if cannabis business operations are allowed in the City? YES
NO
Shall Ordinance No. N.S. 211, establishing a civil service system, adopted on June 7, 1960, be repealed to enable the Hermosa Beach City Council to adopt an updated personnel/civil service ordinance? YES
NO
Arguments in Favor and Against
The deadline for the City Clerk to accept arguments in favor and against the four ballot measures was Tuesday, August 9, 2022, at 6 p.m. Each argument was limited to 300 words and will be titled “Argument in Favor of Measure __” and “Argument Against Measure __” in the Official Sample Ballot Booklet submitted to voters.

Rebuttals to Argument in Favor and Against
The Elections Official will send a copy of the Argument in Favor to the authors of the Argument Against and the Argument Against to the authors of the Argument in Favor, along with a copy of the impartial analysis. An argument author may authorize another person to sign the rebuttal to the opposing argument using the form provided by the Elections Official and in accordance with California Elections Code Section 9285 (Attachment 1). Rebuttals to the Arguments in Favor and Against are due by Tuesday, August 23, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. and are limited to 250 words.

Each Councilmember has the authority to yield their signature to allow another person to sign the rebuttal argument in their place. Up to five new signatures can be submitted for each rebuttal argument printed in the Sample Ballot Booklet. If no opposing argument was submitted to the Elections Official, a rebuttal argument will not be printed in the Sample Ballot Booklet.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Governance Element
City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™546
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0487
Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.

Policy:
· 1.1 Open Meetings. Maintain the community’s trust by holding meeting in which decisions are being made, that are open and available for all community members to attend, participate, or view remotely.

Goal 2. The Community is active and engaged in decision-making processes.

Policy:
· 2.3 Public participation guidelines. Establish parameters and guidelines to ensure public participation in promoted through diverse methods.

Goal 5. Small beach town character is reflected throughout Hermosa Beach.

Policies:
· 5.5 Community benefits. Consider incentives for new development that provides a substantial economic benefit to the community such as retail sales taxes, transient occupancy taxes or higher-paying jobs. Prohibit the provision of incentives that outweigh the direct benefits from the use.
· 5.7 Visitor and resident balance. Recognize the desire and need to balance visitor-serving and local-serving uses as a key to preserving character and the economic vitality of the community.

Goal 6. A broad-based and long-term economic development strategy for Hermosa Beach that supports existing businesses while attracting new business and tourism.

Policy:
· 6.1 Long-term economic development. Support the development and implementation of longterm economic development strategies that seek to establish and keep new businesses and a strong middle class in Hermosa Beach over the decades to come.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

Attachments:

1. Authorization for Another Person to Sign Rebuttal Argument Form

2. Link to July 26, 2022 City Council Meeting Agenda
Respectfully Submitted by: Myra Maravilla, City Clerk
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™547
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0487
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™548

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ELECTION PLANNING SECTION

REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK

AUTHORIZATION FOR ANOTHER PERSON TO SIGN

REBUTTAL ARGUMENT
(Elections Code Sections 9167, 9317 & 9504)
I, authorize the person listed below to
(Print name of AUTHOR of the Argument
sign the rebuttal to the argument  in favor  against Measure (Check one) (Letter)
for the election to be
(Jurisdiction)
held on .
(Date)
Any Author of the Argument may be replaced with another author to sign the Rebuttal. (Print name of Rebuttal Author)
(Signature of Rebuttal Author)
(Title to appear on Rebuttal)
Signature of Argument Author: Date:

Attach this form to the “Declaration by Authors Form” submitted with the Rebuttal Argument. 549
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0475
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of August 9, 2022
TERMINATION OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 07-5108

BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) CONCERNING
CIP 143 - PCH MOBILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution approving a Termination Statement terminating Cooperative Agreement 07- 5108 with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) concerning CIP 143 - PCH Mobility Improvement Project (Attachment 1); and

2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the attached Cooperative Agreement Termination Statement (Attachment 2), subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Executive Summary:

To facilitate preparation of the necessary Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA & ED) for Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 143, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) Mobility Improvement Project, the City must terminate Cooperative Agreement No. 07-5108 with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Following termination of the agreement, a new agreement would be executed between Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation (Metro) and Caltrans for the same work.

Background:

At its September 27, 2016 meeting, City Council adopted Resolution 16-7047 (Attachment 3) approving Cooperative Agreement 07-5108 (Attachment 4) between the City of Hermosa Beach and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) concerning Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 143, PCH Mobility Improvement Project. The agreement stipulated that Caltrans would prepare a Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA & ED) based on a previously completed Project Study Report/Project Development Support (PSR/PDS) (Attachment 5). As part of the same resolution, the City committed to an $800,000 funding match for the City’s portion (17.4 percent) of the cost to prepare the PA & ED. Caltrans was to cover the remaining $3.8 million (82.6 percent) of the projected $4,600,000 project cost.

In October 2019, the City applied for Metro’s Measure M funding for CIP 143, Pacific Coast Highway City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 6 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™550
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0475
In October 2019, the City applied for Metro’s Measure M funding for CIP 143, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) Mobility Improvement Project. The funding request was for $16.4 million to complete the project from environmental documents through design and construction. In August 2020, Metro notified the City that its Board approved $1.8 million in Measure R funding to advance the Project through the PA & ED process.

Under the new funding, the PA & ED would be based on and utilize the previously completed PSR/PDS, finalized in 2015, and supplemented in 2016. The new study effort would also include conducting preliminary engineering studies and preparing the Project Report (PR) required for development of the PA & ED phase of the project. Efforts would include developing more detail or updating studies initiated during the Project Document (PID) phase. This task would also include incorporating studies for initial alternatives, new alternatives, or revisions developed during the environmental process. The final product of this effort would be a Final Environmental Document.

Through the proposed agreement with Metro, the City would no longer be required to provide a funding match for the PA & ED phase of the project and would benefit from using one of Metro’s oncall design consultants to prepare the project documents.

In October 2021, the City’s Public Works Director and the Deputy City Engineer, in conjunction with Metro’s Senior Manager overseeing the project, interviewed four of Metro’s on-call transportation firms to find the most suitable firm to work on this project, ultimately selecting WKE to complete the PA & ED.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
September 27, 2016 City Council adopted a resolution approving a cooperative agreement with Caltrans concerning the Mobility and
Access Improvements Project on Pacific Coast highway
between Herondo Street/Anita Steet and Artesia Boulevard and committed $800,000 to the project.

Analysis:

The primary objectives of the Mobility Improvement Project on Pacific Highway between Herondo Street/Anita Street and Artesia Boulevard, and Aviation Boulevard and Aviation Boulevard from PCH to Prospect Avenue (CIP 143), are to incorporate complete street features, improve pedestrian mobility, and beautify the roadway, while enhancing roadway safety and fulfilling American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. These objectives would be achieved by selecting, and modifying as needed, one of the project alternatives presented in the 2015/2016 PSR/PDS.

It is Caltrans standard procedure to follow the PSR/PDS with the PA & ED phase. During this phase of the project, various environmental and efficacy issues are evaluated to ultimately select the best City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 6 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™551
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0475
of the project, various environmental and efficacy issues are evaluated to ultimately select the best alternative to accommodate the needs of the community, as well as agencies having jurisdiction and/or concern with the project. During this period, input from various concerned agencies and the community is obtained and incorporated into the selection of the final alternative. All of the input would be presented to City Council at a later date.

In order for Metro to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans to work on the PA & ED, the original Cooperative Agreement 07-5108 between the City and Caltrans needs to be terminated. The draft of the new Agreement 07-5261 between Metro and Caltrans is herein provided as Attachment 6 and would be executed for the same work following the termination of the City and Caltrans agreement.

The selected engineering consulting firm, WKE, that would prepare the PA & ED is currently working on initial data collection, Caltrans permits for traffic counts, and reviewing and assessing the project alternatives included in the PSR/PDS. The PA & ED is expected to take approximately 18 to 24 months to complete and the timeline is contingent on the completion of the new cooperative agreement.

Staff recommends City Council adopt the proposed draft resolution (Attachment 1) and authorize the Mayor to execute the Cooperative Agreement Termination Statement (Attachment 2) to terminate Cooperative Agreement 07-5108 between the City and Caltrans. Following the termination, Metro and Caltrans will enter into Cooperative Agreement 07-5261 for the same work and to continue the preparation of the PA & ED.

General Plan Consistency:

This report and associated recommendation have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant Policies are listed below:

Land Use Element
Goal 4. A variety of corridors throughout the city provide opportunities for shopping, recreation, commerce, employment and circulation. Corridors with a variety of uses throughout the city provide opportunities for shopping, recreation, commerce, employment and circulation.

Policies:
· 4.5 Corridor connectivity. Recognize corridors as important cross-town thoroughfares that connect Hermosa Beach, serve as transitions between neighborhoods, provide opportunities for local-serving retail and balance the needs of multiple transport modes. · 4.7 Access to transit. Support the location of transit stations and enhanced stops near the intersection of Aviation Blvd and PCH, and adjacent to Gateway Commercial uses to facilitate City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 6 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™552
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0475
intersection of Aviation Blvd and PCH, and adjacent to Gateway Commercial uses to facilitate and take advantage of transit service, reduce vehicle trips and allow residents without private vehicles to access services.
· 4.9 Streetscape enhancements. Facilitate streetscape improvements, add pedestrian amenities that attract new uses, and revitalize the corridors. · Goal 6. A pedestrian-focused urban form that creates visual interest and a comfortable outdoor environment. By designing buildings and spaces that pay careful attention to the interface between building frontages and the public realm, appropriately scaled design can help to facilitate a walkable, attractive, family-friendly environment that supports healthy and active lifestyles.

Goal 6. A pedestrian-focused urban form that creates visual interest and a comfortable outdoor environment.

Policy:
· 6.2 Streetscaping. Proactively beautify existing streetscapes with street trees, landscaping and pedestrian-scaled lighting.

Mobility Element
Goal 2. A public realm that is safe, comfortable, and convenient for travel via foot, bicycle, public transit, and automobile and creates vibrant, people oriented public spaces that encourage active living.

Policy:
· 2.1 Prioritize public right-of-ways. Prioritize improvements of public right-of-ways that provide heightened levels of safe, comfortable and attractive public spaces for all nonmotorized travelers while balancing the needs of efficient vehicular circulation.

Goal 3. Public right-of-ways supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile.

Policies:
· 3.1 Enhance public right-of-ways. Where right-of-way clearance allows, enhance public right -of ways to improve connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled persons, and public transit stops.
· 3.6 Complete bicycle network. Provide a complete bicycle network along all designated roadways while creating connections to other modes of travel including walking and transit. · 3.7 Transportation project considerations. Ensure transportation planning projects provide consideration to access, health and safety, and individual responsibility that enhances the quality of life of residents in the community.
· 3.10 Require ADA standards. Require that all public right-of-ways be designed per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards by incorporating crosswalks, curb ramps, City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 6 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™553
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0475
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards by incorporating crosswalks, curb ramps, pedestrian signals, and other components to provide ease of access for disabled persons. · 3.11 Site specific conditions. Evaluate and incorporate any site specific conditions or restrictions on public property or right-of-ways during the design and engineering phases for pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Infrastructure Element
Goal 1. Infrastructure systems are functional, safe, and well maintained.

Policy:
· 1.7 Aesthetic and urban form. Require infrastructure and infrastructure improvements that are aesthetically pleasing and consistent with the scenic character of the surrounding area.

Goal 3. Public right-of-ways supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile.

Policies:
· 3.1 Enhance public right-of-way. Where right-of-way clearance allows, enhance public right - of-way to improve connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled persons, and public transit stops.
· 3.2 Complete pedestrian network. Prioritize investment in designated priority sidewalks to ensure a complete network of sidewalks and pedestrian-friendly amenities that enhances pedestrian safety, access opportunities and connectivity to destinations.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution

2. Cooperative Agreement Termination Statement

3. Resolution No. 16-7047

4. Cooperative Agreement 07-5108

5. Project Study Report/Project Development Support (PSR/PDS) 2015 with Supplemental 2016

6. Draft Cooperative Agreement No. 07-5261 between Metro and Caltrans

7. Link to September 27, 2016 City Council Staff Report Respectfully Submitted by: Lucho Rodriguez, Deputy City Engineer Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 6 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™554
Staff Report
REPORT 22-0475
Legal Review: Mike Jenkins, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 6 Printed on 8/4/2022
powered by Legistar™555

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
RESOLUTION NO. 22-

RESOLUTION APPROVING A TERMINATION STATEMENT TERMINATING THE

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) CONCERNING THE MOBILITYAND ACCESS

IMPROVEMENTS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (PCH) BETWEEN HERONDO

STREET/ANITA STREET AND ARTESIA BOULEVARD, AND ON AVIATION BOULEVARD

BETWEEN PCH TO PROSPECT AVENUE, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 143), WHEREBY CALTRANS WOULD PREPARE THE PROJECT APPROVAL AND

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (PA & ED) FOR THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2016, Council Approved Cooperative Agreement No. 07-5108 by and between the City of Hermosa Beach and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) which provided for Caltrans to prepare the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA & ED) for the Project referred to as “CIP 143 – PCH Mobility Improvement Project in Hermosa Beach, on Pacific Highway (PCH) between Herondo St./Anita St. and Artesia Boulevard and on Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue”; and WHEREAS, following the approval of the Termination Statement, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation (Metro) will enter onto a Cooperative Agreement with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) replacing the City – Caltrans Cooperative agreement and providing for both parties to work on the PA & ED for CIP 143 – PCH Mobility Improvement Project in Hermosa Beach, on Pacific Highway (PCH) between Herondo St./Anita St. and Artesia Boulevard, and on Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue, to improve safety operations, mobility and provide aesthetic elements, utilizing the previously completed Project Study Report / Project Development Support (PSR/PDS) completed for the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY
SECTION 1. Approve the Termination Statement, thereby terminating Cooperative Agreement No. 07-5108 by and between the City of Hermosa Beach and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) which provided for Caltrans to prepare the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA & ED) for the Project referred to as “PCH Mobility Improvement Project in Hermosa Beach, on Pacific Highway (PCH) between Herondo St./Anita St. and Artesia Boulevard, and on Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prosect Avenue”. 556
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 9 day of August, 2022.

Michael Detoy
PRESIDENT of the City Council and MAYOR of the City of Hermosa Beach, CA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ ________________________________ Myra Maravilla Michael Jenkins
City Clerk City Attorney
557
07-LA-1-20.6/21.9
EA 31500
Project No. 0715000162
Agreement 07-5108
1 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT

TERMINATION STATEMENT
PARTIES agree that Cooperative Agreement 07-5108 and any Amendments to this Agreement are terminated in writing by PARTIES’ mutual consent. Agreement 07-5261 will be executed between Caltrans and LACMTA for the same work following the termination of 07-5108.

PARTIES have agreed that PROJECT’S SPONSOR is changed from CALTRANS and the City of Hermosa Beach to LACMTA. Funding for the PROJECT has also changed. CALTRANS will no longer be the IMPLEMENTING AGENCY and will be replaced by LACMTA. Therefore, the Cooperative Agreement 07-5108 is hereby terminated and a new AGREEMENT will be executed in its place between LACMTA and CALTRANS.

The final signature date on this document terminates the AGREEMENT except survival articles.

All survival articles in the AGREEMENT will remain in effect until expired by law, terminated or modified in writing by PARTIES’ mutual agreement, whichever occurs first. 558
07-LA-1-20.6/21.9
EA 31500
Project No. 0715000162
Agreement 07-5108
2 SIGNATURES
PARTIES are authorized to enter into this AGREEMENT and have delegated to the undersigned the authority to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of the respective agencies and hereby covenants to have followed all the necessary legal requirements to validly execute this AGREEMENT.

The PARTIES acknowledge that executed copies of this AGREEMENT may be exchanged by facsimile or email, and that such copies shall be deemed to be effective as originals.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Tony Tavares
07 District Director
Certified as to funds:

Vickie Murphy
District Budget Manager
Date: ____________

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
____________________________
Michael Detoy
Mayor
Approved as to form and procedure:
____________________________
Mike Jenkins
City Attorney
Attest:
________________________
Myra Maravilla
City Clerk
Date: _____________
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
2 Vicinity Map
Project Location
SR-1 PM20.6 - PM 21.9
588
589
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
4 Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................5

2. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................6

3. PURPOSE AND NEED .............................................................................6

4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT ..............6

5. DEFICIENCIES .........................................................................................6

6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION .....................................6

7. ALTERNATIVES......................................................................................7

8. RIGHT-OF-WAY ......................................................................................7

9. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ........................................................7

10. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/DOCUMENTATION ...........7

11. FUNDING..................................................................................................8

12. SCHEDULE ...............................................................................................8

13. RISKS ........................................................................................................8

14. FHWA COORDINATION ........................................................................8

15. DISTRICT CONTACTS ...........................................................................9

16. PROJECT REVIEWS ................................................................................9

17. ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................9 590
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
5 1. INTRODUCTION
This supplemental PSR-PDS is prepared to update the approved PSR-PDS dated 01/26/2015. It proposes an additional alternative, Alternative 2a, that will mainly focus on fulfilling American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements for State Route 1 (SR1), also known as Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). Improvements are proposed on PCH between Anita St./Herondo Street (PM 20.6) and Artesia Blvd./Gould Avenue (PM 21.9).

The scope of work for Alternative 2a includes relocating protruding objects and reconstructing sidewalks.

Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) would be required for adjusting driveways.

This report will only address Alternative 2a. See attachment I for all other alternatives.

Project Limits On 07-LA-1 (PCH): From PM 20.6 to PM 21.9 On Aviation Blvd: From PCH to Prospect Ave.

Number of Alternatives 5 (including No Build)
Alternatives Cost Range ($ Millions)
Alt. 2a Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Alt. 4
Capital Outlay Support for
PA&ED 4.6
Capital Outlay
Construction
Cost Range
State R/W 6 - 7 14 - 15 17 - 24 18 - 26
City R/W 0 3 - 4 4 - 6 4 - 7
Capital Outlay
Right-of-Way
Cost Range
State R/W 1 - 5 7 - 10 * 60 - 100 * 60 - 100 *
City R/W 0 6 - 8 ** 11 - 15 ** 11 - 15 **
Funding Source TBD
Type of Facility PCH: 6-lane Conventional Highway
Aviation Blvd.: 4-lane Road
Number of Structures N/A
Anticipated Environmental
Determination or Document EIR/EIS
Project Development
Category
Category 4 or 5, depending on alternative selection in
the next project phase.

SHOPP Project Output 201.361 - ADA Curb ramps: 90 curb ramps 201.378 - Ped. Infrastructure: 80 accessible ped. signals Utility undergrounding cost included: * $8.6 mil.; ** $6.5 mil. 591
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
6 2. BACKGROUND
No Change.

3. PURPOSE AND NEED
No Change.

4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
No Change.

5. DEFICIENCIES
No Change.

6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION
Complete Street Elements and Climate Change Considerations:

In compliance with Deputy Directive DD-64 on Complete Streets, safety and mobility needs of all travelers were evaluated and complete street elements were incorporated in this project. Sidewalk improvements were proposed in all alternatives. Public transit facility and crosswalk enhancements were proposed in Alternatives 2, 3, and 4. Bike lanes were proposed in Alternative 3.

In compliance with Director’s Policy DP-30 on Climate Change, mitigation and adaptation strategies to minimize Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions were considered and integrated in this project. Traffic operation efficiency would be increased with proposed accessibility improvements in Alternatives 2, 3, and 4. Public transportation system would be promoted with proposed sidewalk and bus stop improvements in all alternatives. Active transportation program would be promoted with proposed bike lane installation in Alternative 3.
592
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
7 7. ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 2a would upgrade the existing sidewalks and curb ramps along PCH to the current ADA standards. As needed, protruding objects that limit the clear width of the sidewalks would be relocated. The existing sidewalks would be either fully reconstructed or partially reconstructed with standard curb ramps. This alternative would maintain the existing nonstandard lane widths of 10 ft and the existing 0 ft shoulders.

Design Standards Risk Assessment
Alternative
Design Standard from
Highway Design Manual
Tables 82.1A & 82.1B
Probability of Design
Exception Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High,)
Justification for Probability Rating
2a Mandatory Lane Width
(HDM Section 301.1) Medium
(Existing/Proposed lane width on
SR-1 is 10’)
This section of Route 1 is
Terminal Access (STAA). Further
evaluation is needed.
2a Mandatory Shoulder Width,
Right (HDM Section 302.1) Medium
(Posted speed limit = 30mph
Existing/Proposed right shoulder
width on SR-1 is 0’)
This section of Route 1 is a
conventional multilane highway;
not an access control highway.

8. RIGHT‐OF‐WAY
Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs) would be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet the ADA requirements.

Conceptual right-of-way cost estimates for Alternative 2a has been prepared. (See Attachment F)
Since many of the TCEs impact commercial businesses, it is likely there will be additional impacts requested by the property owners to be mitigated that cannot be identified at this time, and not until discussions with property owners are held.

9. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
No Change.

10. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/DOCUMENTATION
The Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report has been updated. (See Attachment E)
593
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
8 11. FUNDING
Funding for this project would come from various sources.

The current cost for Alternative 2a was estimated to range from $6 million to $7 million for construction, and from $1 million to $5 million for right of way.

The capital outlay support cost for programming PA&ED for this project was estimated to be $4.6 million. City of Hermosa Beach has agreed to contribute $0.8 million for preparation of the PA&ED.

12. SCHEDULE
Project Milestones Scheduled Delivery Date
(Month/Day/Year)
PROGRAM PROJECT M015 03/17/2017
BEGIN ENVIRONMENTAL M020 07/03/2017
CIRCULATE DPR & DED EXTERNALLY M120 04/08/2019
PA&ED M200 01/07/2020
PROJECT PS&E M380 03/07/2022
RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION M410 07/01/2022
READY TO LIST M460 07/29/2022
AWARD M495 10/31/2022
APPROVE CONTRACT M500 11/18/2022
CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE M600 01/08/2024
END PROJECT M800 11/08/2027
This project is proposed to be amended into the 2016 SHOPP for PA/ED phase only under the ADA Program. Programming will be requested for subsequent phases of the project after the selection of the preferred alternative at the conclusion of the PA/ED phase.

13. RISKS
Risks Register has been updated (See Attachment G).

14. FHWA COORDINATION
No Change.
594
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
9 15. DISTRICT CONTACTS
Office of Project Management:

Osama Megalla, Project Manager Phone (213)897-0520
Office of Project and Special Studies
James Vu, Project Engineer Phone (213)897-0116
Fardin Amini, Project Engineer Phone (213)897-0800
Mohamed Ahmed, Sr. Transportation Engineer Phone (213)897-5975 Marco Ruano, Office Chief Phone (213)897-9863
Office of Traffic Engineering:

Yunus Ghausi, Sr. Transportation Engineer Phone (213)897-0560 Office of Environmental Planning:

Karl Price, Sr. Environmental Planner Phone (213)897-1839 Christine Lan, Environmental Planner Phone (213)897-2936 Office of Right of Way Appraisals
Dan Murdoch, Office Chief Phone (213)897-1816

16. PROJECT REVIEWS
Office of Engineering Services:

Zebunnesa Tareque, District Design Liaison
Office of Design ‘B’:

Rene Yin, Sr. Transportation Engineer
Essam Alameddine, Office Chief

17. ATTACHMENTS
A. Location Map
B. Aerial Layout Plans
C. Typical Cross Sections
D. Capital Outlay Project Estimate
E. Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report
F. Right-of-Way Conceptual Cost Estimate Component
G. Risk Register
H. Traffic Investigation Report
I. Approved PSR-PDS
595
Attachment A
596
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
Location Map
Begin Project
PM 20.6
End Project
PM 21.9
597
Attachment B
598
A
nita
S
t
H
erondo
S
t
1 s
t
S
t
1 st
S
t
1 s
t
P
l
2nd
S
t
2nd
S
t
3 rd
S
t
4 th
S
t
3 rd
S
t
PM
2 0.7
PM

20.8 FH
LP
300 PCH
LP
125 PCH
SR-1 (Pacific CoastHwy(PCH))
Signals
Replace Intersection
155 PCH
Driveway Work
New Curbramp
LP (Relocate Light Pole)
FH (Relocate Fire Hydrant)
LAYOUT
L-1
303 PCH
900 N PCH
MATCHLINE L-2
New Driveway

BEGIN PROJECT
PM 20.6
New Curbramp

NO SCALE
0 50 100 FT
252 PCH
344 PCH
ALTERNATIVE 2A: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
x
x
x
x
x

LAST REVISION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE PLOTTED =>TIME PLOTTED => $TIME
$DATE
00-00-00

FUNCTIONAL SUPERVISOR

REVISED BY

DATE REVISED
CALCULATEDDESIGNED BYCHECKED BY
No.

Exp.

CIVIL

REG ISTERED

STATE OF CALIF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ITS OFFICERS

OR AGENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ELECTRONIC
COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHEET.

REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE

PLANS APPROVAL DATE
07 LA 01

POST MILE

20.6/21.9 01 06

PROFESSIONAL ENG INEER
ORNIA
Dist COUNTY ROUTE

TOTAL PROJECT
SHEET
No.

TOTAL
SHEETS
USERNAME => 0 1 2 3
DGN FILE => $REQUEST
$USER
BORDER LAST REVISED 7/2/2010

IS IN INCHES

RELATIVE BORDER SCALE
UNIT 1786 PROJECT NUMBER & PHASE 0715000162 K
599
4 th
S
t
5 th
S
t
5 th
S
t
6 th
S
t
7 th
S
t
8 th
S
t
8 th
S
t
8 th
P
l
PM

20.9 PM

21.0 PM

21.1 506 PCH
FH
8 th
P
l
422 PCH
LAYOUT
L-2
FH (Relocate Fire Hydrant)
Signals
Replace Intersection
MATCHLINE L-3
Driveway Work
Signals
Replace Intersection
MATCHLINE L-1
Dr
837
iveway Work
PCH
6 th
S
555 P
t
CH
New Curbramp
New Driveway New Curbramp
560 PCH
SR-1 (PCH)
0 50 100 FT
403 PCH
454 PCH

NO SCALE
ALTERNATIVE 2A: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
x
x
x
x
x

LAST REVISION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE PLOTTED =>TIME PLOTTED => $TIME
$DATE
00-00-00

FUNCTIONAL SUPERVISOR

REVISED BY

DATE REVISED
CALCULATEDDESIGNED BYCHECKED BY
No.

Exp.

CIVIL

REG ISTERED

STATE OF CALIF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ITS OFFICERS

OR AGENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ELECTRONIC
COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHEET.

REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE

PLANS APPROVAL DATE
07 LA 01

POST MILE

20.6/21.9 02 06

PROFESSIONAL ENG INEER
ORNIA
Dist COUNTY ROUTE

TOTAL PROJECT
SHEET
No.

TOTAL
SHEETS
USERNAME => 0 1 2 3
DGN FILE => $REQUEST
$USER
BORDER LAST REVISED 7/2/2010

IS IN INCHES

RELATIVE BORDER SCALE
UNIT 1786 PROJECT NUMBER & PHASE 0715000162 K
600
9 th
S
t
10th
S
t
10th
S
t
11th
S
t
11th
P
l
A viation Blvd
13 th
S
t
14 th
S
t
P
ier
A
ve
PM

21.2 PM

21.3 FH

DRAINAGE
9 th
S
t
FH (Relocate Fire Hydrant)
LAYOUT
L-3
New Driveway
M

ATCHLINE L-4
Signals
Replace Intersection
Driv
931
eway Work
PCH
Driveway Work
860 PCH
Driveway Work
900 PCH
Driveway Work
1131PCH
Signals
Replace Intersection
Driveway Work
1200 PCH
Relocate Drainage
M

ATCHLINE L-2

DRAINAGE
New Curbramp
SR-1 (PCH)
0 50 100 FT
1314 PCH
1401PCH
GreenwoodPark

NO SCALE
ALTERNATIVE 2A: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
x
x
x
x
x

LAST REVISION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE PLOTTED =>TIME PLOTTED => $TIME
$DATE
00-00-00

FUNCTIONAL SUPERVISOR

REVISED BY

DATE REVISED
CALCULATEDDESIGNED BYCHECKED BY
No.

Exp.

CIVIL

REG ISTERED

STATE OF CALIF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ITS OFFICERS

OR AGENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ELECTRONIC
COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHEET.

REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE

PLANS APPROVAL DATE
07 LA 01

POST MILE

20.6/21.9 03 06

PROFESSIONAL ENG INEER
ORNIA
Dist COUNTY ROUTE

TOTAL PROJECT
SHEET
No.

TOTAL
SHEETS
USERNAME => 0 1 2 3
DGN FILE => $REQUEST
$USER
BORDER LAST REVISED 7/2/2010

IS IN INCHES

RELATIVE BORDER SCALE
UNIT 1786 PROJECT NUMBER & PHASE 0715000162 K
601
15 th
S
t
16 th
S
t
16 th
S
t
17 th
S
t
1 8
th
S
t
PM

21.4 PM

21.5 DRAINAGE
FH
MATCHLINE L-3
MATCHLINE L-5
FH (Relocate Fire Hydrant)
LAYOUT
L-4
New Driveway
New Curbramp
Signals
Replace Intersection

DRAINAGE
Driveway Work
1837
Sen
PCH
iorLivingFacility
PM

21.6 1821PCH
Relocate Drainage
SR-1 (PCH)
0 50 100 FT
1600 PCH
1601PCH

NO SCALE
ALTERNATIVE 2A: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
x
x
x
x
x

LAST REVISION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE PLOTTED =>TIME PLOTTED => $TIME
$DATE
00-00-00

FUNCTIONAL SUPERVISOR

REVISED BY

DATE REVISED
CALCULATEDDESIGNED BYCHECKED BY
No.

Exp.

CIVIL

REG ISTERED

STATE OF CALIF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ITS OFFICERS

OR AGENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ELECTRONIC
COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHEET.

REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE

PLANS APPROVAL DATE
07 LA 01

POST MILE

20.6/21.9 04 06

PROFESSIONAL ENG INEER
ORNIA
Dist COUNTY ROUTE

TOTAL PROJECT
SHEET
No.

TOTAL
SHEETS
USERNAME => 0 1 2 3
DGN FILE => $REQUEST
$USER
BORDER LAST REVISED 7/2/2010

IS IN INCHES

RELATIVE BORDER SCALE
UNIT 1786 PROJECT NUMBER & PHASE 0715000162 K
602
19 th
S
t
21st
St
20th
S
t
21 s
t
S
t
24 th
S
t
24 th
P
l
FH (Relocate Fire Hydrant)
LAYOUT
L-5
New Curbramp
PM

21.7 FH
Relocate Drainage
PM

21.8 Drainage
Drainage
SR-1 (PCH)
2100 PCH
PM

21.9 MATCHLINE L-4
MATCHLINE L-6
0 50 100 FT
Signals
Ne
1901
w Intersection
PCH
2121PCH

NO SCALE
ALTERNATIVE 2A: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
x
x
x
x
x

LAST REVISION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE PLOTTED =>TIME PLOTTED => $TIME
$DATE
00-00-00

FUNCTIONAL SUPERVISOR

REVISED BY

DATE REVISED
CALCULATEDDESIGNED BYCHECKED BY
No.

Exp.

CIVIL

REG ISTERED

STATE OF CALIF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ITS OFFICERS

OR AGENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ELECTRONIC
COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHEET.

REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE

PLANS APPROVAL DATE
07 LA 01

POST MILE

20.6/21.9 05 06

PROFESSIONAL ENG INEER
ORNIA
Dist COUNTY ROUTE

TOTAL PROJECT
SHEET
No.

TOTAL
SHEETS
USERNAME => 0 1 2 3
DGN FILE => $REQUEST
$USER
BORDER LAST REVISED 7/2/2010

IS IN INCHES

RELATIVE BORDER SCALE
UNIT 1786 PROJECT NUMBER & PHASE 0715000162 K
603
LAYOUT
L-6
New Curbramp
G
ould
A ve
SR-1 (PCH)
A
rte
s
ia
A
v
e
PM 21.9

END PROJECT
MATCHLINE L-5
0 50 100 FT
2601 PCH

NO SCALE
ALTERNATIVE 2A: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
x
x
x
x
x

LAST REVISION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE PLOTTED =>TIME PLOTTED => $TIME
$DATE
00-00-00

FUNCTIONAL SUPERVISOR

REVISED BY

DATE REVISED
CALCULATEDDESIGNED BYCHECKED BY
No.

Exp.

CIVIL

REG ISTERED

STATE OF CALIF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ITS OFFICERS

OR AGENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ELECTRONIC
COPIES OF THIS PLAN SHEET.

REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE

PLANS APPROVAL DATE
07 LA 01

POST MILE

20.6/21.9 06 06

PROFESSIONAL ENG INEER
ORNIA
Dist COUNTY ROUTE

TOTAL PROJECT
SHEET
No.

TOTAL
SHEETS
USERNAME => 0 1 2 3
DGN FILE => $REQUEST
$USER
BORDER LAST REVISED 7/2/2010

IS IN INCHES

RELATIVE BORDER SCALE
UNIT 1786 PROJECT NUMBER & PHASE 0715000162 K
604
Attachment C
605
606
Attachment D
607
07-LA-1
715000162

20.XX.201.378
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 6,390,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $
$
RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS See ROW datasheet
$
Program Manager
Phone No.

Project Manager
Phone No.

Upgrade ADA curb ramps and accessibility (Option 1-spot sidewalk replacement))

COST ESTIMATE
DIST-CO-RTE:

Up grade ADA curb ramps and accessibility
ID:

Program Code:

USE
Project Description:

SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS

TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS
On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.6) and Artesia Blvd (PM 21.9).

Proposed Improvement
(Scope):

Limits:

Sheet 1 of 6
608
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost
463 CYD $220.00 $101,860
207 CYD $220.00 $45,540
Subtotal of Earthwork Items $148,000
Section 2 Pavement Structure Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost 670 CYD $550.00 $368,500
Repair Damaged Area
Asphalt Concrete
Cement-Treated Base
Aggregate Base, Class 3
Aggregate Subbase
Edge Drains
Maintenance Access and
incidental staging cost (Pull out)
Subtotal Pavement Structural Section $369,000
Section 3 Drainage Items Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost Biofiltration Strip
Biofiltration Swale
Media Filter Device
Gross Solid Removal Devices :

Detention Basin
Drainage Modification 8EA $50,000 $400,000
Subtotal Drainag $400,000
Remove Minor Concrete
(sidewalk)
Roadway Excavation
Remove AC Pavement
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Imported Borrow
Section 1 Earthwork
Remove Minor Concrete
(curb and gutter)
PCC
Clearing & Grubbing
Sheet 2 of 6
609
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

Section 4 Specialty Items Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost Curb Ramp 90 EA $15,000 $1,350,000
Driveway 9EA $25,000 $225,000
Accessible Pedestrian Signa 80 EA $2,000 $160,000
Relocate Traffic Signal 7EA $150,000 $1,050,000
Relocate Fire Hydrant 5EA $5,000 $25,000
Detectable Waring Surface
Temporary Railing(Type k)
Construction Site BMPs 1 LS $125,000
Lead Compliance Plan Preparat 1 LS $10,000
Hazardous Waste Mitigation W 1 LS $10,000
Environmental Mitigation 1 LS $10,000
Water Pollution Control Program(WPCP)
Resident Engineer Office 1 LS $80,000
Subtotal Specialty Items $3,045,000
Section 5 Traffic Items Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost Incidental fund for lighting, 1 LS $20,000
Pull boxes and conduit relocation
Remove Painted Traffic Strip(White)
Temporary Traffic Stripe(paint)
Remove Pavement Markers(Type G&H)
Traffic Control System 1 LS $250,000
Traffic Management Plan 1 LS $5,000
Yellow Thermoplastic Traffic Strip
Paint Traffic Strie(2-coat)
Pavement Marker Type H
Pavement Marker Type G
Construction Area Sign
Maiden Barrier Atchitecture Treament
Temporary Railing Type K
Subtotal Traffic Items $275,000
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1-5 $4,240,000
Remove&Replace Yellow
Sheet 3 of 6
610
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

Section 6 Minor Items
X 5.00% $212,000
Subtotal Sections 1-5 (x%)
TOTAL MINOR ITEMS $220,000
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1-6 $4,460,000
Section 7 Roadway Mobilization
X 10.00% $446,000
Subtotal Sections 1-6 (x%)
TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION $450,000
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1-7 $4,910,000
Section 8 Roadway Additions
X 5.00% $245,500
Subtotal Sections 1-7 (x%)
X 25.00% $1,227,500
Subtotal Sections 1-7 (x%)
TOTAL ROADWAY ADDITIONS $1,480,000
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $6,390,000
(Total of sections 1-8)
Estimate Prepared By Fardin Amini Phone # 7-0800
Estimate Checked By Fardin Amini Phone # 7-0800
$4,910,000
$4,240,000
$4,910,000
$4,460,000
Sheet 4 of 6
611
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Bridge Name
Structure Type
Width (Replacement) - (ft)
Widening Width - (ft)
Span Lengths - (ft)
Total Area - (ft2 )
Footing Type (Pile/Spread)
Cost Per ft2
(include 10% mobilization
and 20% contingency)
Total Cost for Structure
Removal Cost
Remove Approach/Departure Slabs
Approach/Departure Slabs
Joint Seal
Railroad Related Costs SUBTOTAL STRUCTURES ITEMS

SUBTOTAL RAILROAD ITEMS

TOTAL STRUCTURES ITEMS
USE
Estimate Prepared By
(See Attachment J - Advance Planning Study)
Fardin Amini

STRUCTURE
7-0800
Sheet 5 of 6
612
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

III. RIGHT OF WAY
Current Values Escalated Values*

A. R/W Acquisition
B. Utility Relocation (State Share)
C. RAP (cont rate.)
D. Clearance/Demolition
E. Title and Escrow Fees

TOTAL ESTIMATE COST
Anticipated Date of Right of Way Certificaiton
(Date to which Values are escalated)
F. Construction Contract Work
COMMENTS:

Estimate Prepared By Fardin Amini 7-0800
Date (If appropriate, attach
additional pages and backup)
Sheet 6 of 6
613
07-LA-1
715000162

20.XX.201.378
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 6,760,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $
$
RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS See ROW datasheet
$
Program Manager
Phone No.

Project Manager
Phone No.

Proposed Improvement
(Scope):

Limits:

TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS
On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.6) and Artesia Blvd (PM 21.9).

USE
Project Description:

SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS

COST ESTIMATE
DIST-CO-RTE:

Up grade ADA curb ramps and accessibility
ID:

Program Code:

Upgrade ADA curb ramps and accessibility (Option 2-All new sidewalk) Sheet 1 of 6
614
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost
2,234 CYD $150.00 $335,100
962 CYD $150.00 $144,300
Subtotal of Earthwork I $480,000
Section 2 Pavement Structure Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost 3,196 CYD $550.00 $1,757,800
Repair Damaged Area
Asphalt Concrete
Cement-Treated Base
Aggregate Base, Class 3
Aggregate Subbase
Edge Drains
Maintenance Access and
incidental staging cost (Pull out)
Subtotal Pavement Structura $1,758,000
Section 3 Drainage Items Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost Biofiltration Strip
Biofiltration Swale
Media Filter Device
Gross Solid Removal Devices :

Detention Basin
Drainage Modification 8EA $50,000 $400,000
Subtotal Drainage Sec $400,000
Clearing & Grubbing
Remove Minor Concrete
(curb and gutter)
PCC
Imported Borrow
Section 1 Earthwork
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Remove Minor Concrete
(sidewalk)
Roadway Excavation
Remove AC Pavement
Sheet 2 of 6
615
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

Section 4 Specialty Items Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost Curb Ramp
Driveway
Accessible Pedestrian Signa 80 EA $2,000 $160,000
Relocate Traffic Signal 7EA $150,000 $1,050,000
Relocate Fire Hydrant 5EA $5,000 $25,000
Dectectable Waring Surface 1,800 SQFT $55 $99,000
Temporary Railing(Type k)
Construction Site BMPs 1 LS $125,000
Lead Compliance Plan Preparat 1 LS $10,000
Hazardous Waste Mitigation W 1 LS $10,000
Environmental Mitigation 1 LS $10,000
Water Pollution Control Program(WPCP)
Resident Engineer Office 1 LS $80,000
Subtotal Specialty Ite $1,569,000
Section 5 Traffic Items Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost Section Cost Incidental fund for lighting, 1 LS $20,000
Pull boxes and conduit relocation
Remove Painted Traffic Strip(White)
Temporary Traffic Stripe(paint)
Remove Pavement Markers(Type G&H)
Traffic Control System 1 LS $250,000
Traffic Management Plan 1 LS $5,000
Yellow Thermoplastic Traffic Strip
Paint Traffic Strie(2-coat)
Pavement Marker Type H
Pavement Marker Type G
Construction Area Sign
Maiden Barrier Atchitecture Treament
Temporary Railing Type K
Subtotal Traffic Item $275,000
SUBTOTAL SECTION $4,490,000
Remove&Replace Yellow
Sheet 3 of 6
616
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

Section 6 Minor Items
X 5.00% $225,000
Subtotal Sections 1-5 (x%)
TOTAL MINOR ITEM $230,000
SUBTOTAL SECTION $4,720,000
Section 7 Roadway Mobilization
X 10.00% $472,000
Subtotal Sections 1-6 (x%)
TOTAL ROADWAY MOBIL $480,000
SUBTOTAL SECTIO $5,200,000
Section 8 Roadway Additions
X 5.00% $260,000
Subtotal Sections 1-7 (x%)
X 25.00% $1,300,000
Subtotal Sections 1-7 (x%)
TOTAL ROADWAY ADD $1,560,000
TOTAL ROADWAY IT $6,760,000
(Total of sections 1-8)
Estimate Prepared By Fardin Amini Phone # 7-0800
Estimate Checked By Fardin Amini Phone # 7-0800
$4,720,000
$5,200,000
$4,490,000
$5,200,000
Sheet 4 of 6
617
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Bridge Name
Structure Type
Width (Replacement) - (ft)
Widening Width - (ft)
Span Lengths - (ft)
Total Area - (ft2 )
Footing Type (Pile/Spread)
Cost Per ft2
(include 10% mobilization
and 20% contingency)
Total Cost for Structure
Removal Cost
Remove Approach/Departure Slabs
Approach/Departure Slabs
Joint Seal
Railroad Related Costs SUBTOTAL STRUCTURE

SUBTOTAL RAILROAD

TOTAL STRUCTURES
USE
Estimate Prepared By Fardin Amini 7-0800

STRUCTURE
(See Attachment J - Advance Planning Study)
Sheet 5 of 6
618
07-LA-1
715000162
DIST-CO-RTE:

ID:

III. RIGHT OF WAY
Current Values Escalated Values*

A. R/W Acquisition
B. Utility Relocation (State Share)
C. RAP (cont rate.)
D. Clearance/Demolition
E. Title and Escrow Fees

TOTAL ESTIMATE COST
Anticipated Date of Right of Way Certificaiton
(Date to which Values are escalated)
F. Construction Contract Work
COMMENTS:

Estimate Prepared By Fardin Amini 7-0800
Date (If appropriate, attach
additional pages and backup)
Sheet 6 of 6
619
Attachment E
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
Attachment F
640
State of California California State Transportation Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Mohamed Ahmed , Design Manager
Caltrans
District 7, Los Angeles Office
From: Dan Murdoch, Office Chief
Right of Way Appraisals, and Planning & Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
07-LA-1-PMPM 20.6 - PM 21.9
Project ID # 0715000162
EA: 31500K
Alt:

Data Sheet ID NO: ds2378
A Field Review was conducted
Scope of the Right of Way
Right of Way Required
Number of Parcels
Type of Parcels
Land Area: Fee: Easement:

Displaced Persons/Businesses
Demolition/Clearance
Railroad Involvement
Support Costs
Cost Estimates
Capital Costs
Schedule
Right of Way will require 24 months to deliver a Right of Way Certification #1 from Final R/W Maps. This estimate is based on a Right of Way Certification date of 7/1/22.

Yes
Yes
None
0 sqft 0 sqft
No
No
No
Utility Involvement No
$250,001-$500,000
$1,000,001-$5,000,000
Areas of Concern
Date: 12/9/16
641
Attachment G
642
643
644
645
Attachment H
646
Summary of Investigation Report of the ADA Grievances along PCH in Hermosa Beach
1 | Page

INTRODUCTION
This summery of reports is to address the ADA Grievances along PCH in City of Hermosa Beach. The grievances have been investigated and based on the field observations, we have determined the following ADA features are non-compliance with the current ADA standards, missing ADA curb ramps, and obstacles blocking the path of sidewalks to pedestrian. The following’s are the result of field investigation of 320 issues pertaining to ADA grievances. See the attached file for description of all Categories and the proposed action plans.

Category A: Clear Floor Space, signal poles, and fire hydrants which restricted the pedestrian paths, and the access curb ramps (18 locations),
Counter measure to address category A is to relocate the signal poles, fire hydrants and widen the east and west sidewalks by two (2) feet, respectively. The widening would require the reconstruction of the curb and gutter, drainage improvements, roadway improvements, and pavement delineation.

Action Plan: Improvements will be paid by ADA program. The cost of these improvements are estimated at $4.2 Million.

Category B: Abrupt Level Change (51 locations), Running Slope (45 locations), Cross Slope (50 locations), Grade Breaks (14 locations), Marker Lines (34), Defined Edges (41 locations), Counter measure to address the Category B, the counter measure would be to resurface the existing AC pavement.

Action Plan: Improvements should be performed by a CAPM (Program in 2020/2021 FY). The Capital cost of improvements is estimated at $5,950,000.

Accessible: A site, building, facility, or portion thereof that complies with this part (of the 2010 ADA Standards) [2010 ADA Standards].

Sidewalk: A surfaced pedestrian way contiguous to a street used by the public [Title 24 11B-106.5]. Also, see the discussion in Section 4.3.1, “Surface” of this DIB.

Minimum Accessibility
Newly constructed or altered (see Section 4.1.2) streets, roads, and highways must contain curb ramps or other sloped areas at any intersection having curbs or other barriers to entry from a street level pedestrian walkway.

Surface
(1) All surfaces on an accessible route shall be stable, firm, and slip resistant. {2014 ADA Standards 302.1 and Title 24 11B-302.1]
(2) Changes in level up to ¼ inch may be vertical and without edge treatment. [2014 ADA Standards 303.2 and Title 24 11B-303.2]
(3) Changes in level between ¼ inch and ½ inch shall be beveled with a slope no greater than 1:2 (50%). {2014 ADA Standards 303.3 and Title 24 11B-303.3]
(4) Changes in level greater than ½ inch shall be accomplished by means of a ramp. [2014 ADA Standards 303.4 and Title 24 11B-303.4]
Clear Width
647
Summary of Investigation Report of the ADA Grievances along PCH in Hermosa Beach
2 | Page
Highway Design Manual (HDM) Index 105.1 states, as an Advisory Design Standard, that “the minimum width of a sidewalk should be 5 feet.” In many locations, local agency sidewalk standards will require greater widths; which can provide even greater accessibility than the minimum standard stated in the HDM. If for a specific project this is the case, the local agency standard should be used. Street furniture, signs, above ground utilities and poles, business frontage needs, street landscaping, etc. should all be placed outside of the “clear width zone” of a sidewalk.

In addition to the standards referenced above, the following Accessibility Design Standards are to be followed:
(1) If an accessible route has less than 60 inches clear width, then passing spaces at least 60 inches by 60 inches shall be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet. [2014 ADA Standards 403.5.3 and Title 24 11B-403.5.3]
(2) The clear width for sidewalks and walks shall be 48 inches minimum. [Title 24 11B-403.5.1.3] (3) When, because of right-of-way restrictions, natural barriers or other existing conditions, the enforcing agency determines that compliance with the 48-inch clear sidewalk width would create an unreasonable hardship, the clear width may be reduced to 36 inches. [Title 2411B-403.5.1.3] Grade
(1) All walks with continuous gradients shall have resting areas, 5 feet in length, at intervals of 400 feet maximum.
[Title 24 11B-403.7]
(2) The accessibility standard in (1) above does not apply to sidewalks, but (2) does. The grade or slope of an accessible route should be as flat as possible. Since exterior facilities must drain, a walkway can be at 2% and still be considered level. The practical use of the accessibility standard in (1) above is thus applied for grades exceeding 2%. Any part of an accessible route with a slope greater than 1:20 (5%) shall be considered a ramp, and must comply with the standards of a ramp. See Section 4.3.7 of this DIB, “Ramps,” for further information.

Cross Slope
(1) No more than a 2% cross slope shall be constructed on a walkway that is an accessible route.

[2010 ADA Standards 403.3 and Title 24 11B-403.3]
Ramps
(1) Slopes that are greater than 1:20 will be considered ramps and must not exceed a 30-inch rise without landings.
[2010 ADA Standards 106.5, 405.6 and Title 24 11B-403.3, 11B-405.6] (2) The maximum slope of a ramp shall not exceed 1:12 (8.33%). [2010 ADA Standards 405.2 and Title 24 11B-405.2]
(3) The cross slope of ramp surfaces shall be no greater than 2%. [2010 ADA Standards 405.3 and Title 24 11B-405.3]
(4) In the case of a historic property/historical resource, ramps no greater than 1:10, cannot exceed a horizontal distance of 5 feet. Or, ramps of 1:6 slope cannot exceed a horizontal distance of 13 inches. Signs shall be posted at upper and lower levels to indicate steepness of the slope. [Title 24 8-603.6]
648
Summary of Investigation Report of the ADA Grievances along PCH in Hermosa Beach
3 | Page
Curb Ramps
(1) Perpendicular and parallel curb ramps shall have a running slope not steeper than 1:12. Blended transitions shall have a running slope not steeper than 1:20. [2014 ADA Standards 406.1, 405.2 and Title 24 11B-406.2.1, 406.3.1, 406.4.1]
(2) Ramp running slope length shall not exceed 15 feet. [PROWAG R304.2.2, R304.3.2] (3) The clear width of curb ramp runs (excluding any flared sides), blended transitions, and turning spaces shall be 48 inches minimum. [Title 24 11B-406.5.2] Landings
Landing shall be provided at the tops of curb ramps and blended transitions. The landing clear length shall be 48 inches minimum. Exception: parallel curb ramps shall not be required to comply with the top landing requirement.

Level landing is allowed to be sloped up to 2% to accommodate drainage. For curb ramp landing guidance, see Section 4.3.8 of this DIB. This DIB does not discuss the situation where a door opens onto a landing at a building entrance.

Handrails
Handrails are not required on curb ramps or along sidewalks. In all other situations, the following applies:

Warning Curbs:
(1) Ramp runs with a rise greater than 6 inches shall have handrails. Handrails shall be provided on both sides of stairs and ramps. [2014 ADA Standards 405.8, 505.2 and Title 24 11B-505.2] (1) Abrupt changes in level exceeding 4 inches in a vertical dimension between walks, sidewalks or other pedestrian ways and adjacent surfaces or features shall be identified by warning curbs at least 6 inches in height above the walk or sidewalk surface. Exception: a warning curb is not required between a walk or sidewalk and an adjacent street or driveway. [Title 24 11B-303.5 including Exception #1]
(2) A warning curb is not required when a guard or handrail is provided with a guide rail centered 2 inches minimum and 4 inches maximum above the surface of the walk or sidewalk. [Title 24 11B-303.5 Exception #2]
Detectable Warning Surface

1. Detectable warnings at hazardous vehicular areas shall be 36 inches in width. [Title 24 11B-705.1.2.5] 649
Attachment I
650
651
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
2 652
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
3 This project study report-project development support has been prepared under the direction of the following registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer attests to the technical information contained herein and the engineering data upon which recommendations, conclusions, and decisions are based.
01/23/2015

JAMES VU DATE
12/31/16
C58683
James Vu
653
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
4 Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................5

2. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................6

3. PURPOSE AND NEED .............................................................................6

4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT ..............7

5. DEFICIENCIES .........................................................................................7

6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION .....................................7

7. ALTERNATIVES......................................................................................8

7.1 Alternative #1 – No Build ....................................................................8

7.2 Alternative #2 .......................................................................................8

7.3 Alternative #3 .......................................................................................9

7.4 Alternative #4 .......................................................................................9

7.5 Other Alternatives Considered ...........................................................10

7.6 Design Standards Risk Assessment ....................................................10

8. RIGHT-OF-WAY ....................................................................................10

9. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ......................................................11

10. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/DOCUMENTATION .........11

11. FUNDING................................................................................................11

12. SCHEDULE .............................................................................................12

13. RISKS ......................................................................................................12

14. FHWA COORDINATION ......................................................................12

15. CONSTRUCTION PHASING ................................................................12

16. DISTRICT CONTACTS .........................................................................13

17. PROJECT REVIEWS ..............................................................................13

18. ATTACHMENTS ....................................................................................14 654
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
5 1. INTRODUCTION
This project proposes to improve mobility and beautify the roadway at the following locations within the City of Hermosa Beach (City):
 On State Route 1 (SR-1), also known as Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), between Anita St./Herondo St. (PM 20.6) and Artesia Blvd./Gould Ave. (PM 21.9).  On Aviation Blvd. between PCH and Prospect Ave.

Three build alternatives are proposed in this report. Alternative 2 proposes to improve pedestrian mobility and provide aesthetically pleasing roadway by reconstructing the sidewalks, undergrounding utilities, and constructing a landscaped median. Alternatives 3 and 4 propose to improve mobility and safety for all users including pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users by implementing the concept of road diet and constructing roundabouts at some of the intersections.

Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) would be required for adjusting driveways for all three build alternatives. Right of way acquisition would be required for Alternatives 3 and 4 to construct roundabouts at PCH/Aviation Blvd., PCH/Pier Ave., PCH/Artesia Blvd., and Aviation Blvd./Prospect Ave.

Project Limits 07-LA-1 PM 20.6/21.9
Number of Alternatives 4
Alternative 1
($ Million)
Alternative 2
($ Million)
Alternative 3
($ Million)
Alternative 4
($ Million)
Capital Outlay Support for
PA&ED 0 2-3 2-3 2-3
Capital Outlay
Construction Cost
Range
State
R/W 0 14-15 17-24 18-26
City
R/W 0 3-4 4-6 4-7
Capital Outlay Rightof-Way Cost Range
(including utilities
undergrounding)
State
R/W 0 7-10 * 60-100 * 60-100 *
City
R/W 0 6-8 ** 11-15 ** 11-15 **
Funding Source TBD
Type of Facility PCH: 6-lane Conventional Highway
Aviation Blvd.: 4-lane Road
Number of Structures N/A
Anticipated Environmental
Determination or Document

EIR/EIS
Project Development
Category
Category 4A or 4B, depending on alternative selection
in the next project phase.

Utility undergrounding cost included: * $8.6 mil.; ** $6.5 mil. 655
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
6 2. BACKGROUND
SR-1 is a north-south state highway that traverses through Los Angeles and Ventura Counties Coastal region and is used for inter-regional, intra-regional, recreational and commuter travel through highly urbanized areas in Los Angeles County, and rural areas of Ventura County. It varies from one lane to four lanes in each direction. It serves many unincorporated areas, coastal cities and communities in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties by providing access to beaches, parks and other attractions along the route. The route runs beside the coastline or close to it and turns inland to avoid federally controlled or protected areas such as Vandenberg Air Force Base, Diablo Canyon Power Plant and Point Reyes National Seashore.

Within the project limits, SR-1 is designated as Pacific Coast Highway. In each direction, it generally consists of a 10 to 12 ft wide two-way left-turn lane, two 10 ft mixed-flow lanes, an 11 ft flexible lane (which is used for parking during non-peak hour), and sidewalks varying from 3 to 8 ft wide.

Within the project limits, Aviation Blvd. is a four-lane road with time limit parking spaces, and 8 ft wide sidewalks.

See Attachment A, Vicinity Map for project location.

3. PURPOSE AND NEED
Purpose:

The primary objectives of this project are to incorporate complete street features, improve pedestrian mobility and beautify the roadway, while enhancing traffic safety, and fulfilling American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.

Need:

Within the project limits, the sidewalks are generally narrow and obstructed with utility features, which discourages pedestrian use and minimize accessibility. There are no bike lanes within the project limits, which results in bicyclists sharing the traveled lanes or the sidewalk. The traveled way has non-standard lane widths, and the intersection geometrics are inadequate for u-turn movement, which hinders the traffic flow. 656
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
7 4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
An Intersection Control Evaluation screening meeting has been held, pursuant to Traffic Operations Policy Directive #13-02. It was agreed that the proposed roundabouts at PCH/Aviation Blvd., PCH/Pier Ave., PCH/Artesia Blvd., and Aviation Blvd./Prospect Ave. would provide substantial traffic flow benefits to the area.

Office of Traffic Engineering recommended that a detailed Traffic Impact Analysis be performed during Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA/ED) phase to accurately assess potential impacts of the PCH flexible lanes removal.

5. DEFICIENCIES
Following are identified transportation deficiencies:
 Lane width: The existing lane width is 10 ft. Alternatives 3 and 4 propose eliminating the two-way left-turn lane on PCH and providing standard 11 ft traveled lanes. This would improve traffic safety along this corridor.  Bike lanes: Currently there is no bike lane within the project limits. Bicyclists have to share a lane with motorists. Alternative 3 proposes to add a bike lane where geometrically feasible. This is consistent with Caltrans’ Complete Street policy and City of Hermosa Beach’s improvement plan for Aviation Blvd.  Transfer facilities: Existing bus stops are small and lack visibility. This project would construct standard bus-stop concrete pads and new bus canopies. This would improve connectivity to public transit for bicyclists and pedestrians, which in turn supports increased bicycling and walking.
 U-turn locations: Intersections within the project limits are generally inadequate for u-turn movements. Alternatives 3 and 4 propose adding roundabouts at PCH/Aviation Blvd., PCH/Pier Ave., PCH/Artesia Blvd., and Aviation Blvd./Prospect Ave. This would improve traffic safety and traffic flow in the area.  Sidewalks: Within the project limits, sidewalks generally do not comply with the ADA standards. In some areas, the sidewalks are narrow and in poor condition. This project would relocate/remove protruding objects, and reconstruct the sidewalk to meet ADA requirements.

6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION
Following are the known recently completed/planned projects within the study limits:
 EA 1W140: Cold Plane, AC Overlay between Artesia Blvd. (PM 21.9) and Rosecrans Ave. (PM 23.9) in the City of Manhattan Beach. This project was completed in August 2014.
657
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
8  EA 4T540: This project proposes to install left turn phasing and upgrade traffic signal system at the intersection of State Route 1, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and 2nd St. (PM 20.7). In Addition, it is proposed to modify an existing pedestrian crosswalk and install ADA curb ramps and In-Roadway Warning Lights (IRWL) at the intersection of PCH and 3rd St. This project is scheduled to be constructed in Spring 2016.

7. ALTERNATIVES
Four alternatives are presented in this report (See Attachment B).

7.1 Alternative #1 – No Build
The “No Build” Alternative will maintain the current configuration of the existing facility. It is presented as a basis of comparison with the other alternatives.

7.2 Alternative #2
Within State Right of Way
On PCH, this alternative would beautify the roadway and upgrade the existing sidewalks to the current ADA standards. Protruding obstacles that limit the clear width of the sidewalks would be removed. Exposed utility lines would be buried underground, and the existing two-way left-turn lane would be reconstructed to provide space for raised landscaped median. This alternative would maintain the existing nonstandard lane widths of 10 ft and the existing 0 ft shoulders.

Temporary Construction Easements would be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet the ADA requirements.

Within City Right of Way
On Aviation Blvd., this alternative would remove protruding obstacles that limit the clear width of the sidewalks. Exposed utility lines would be buried underground, and the existing two-way left-turn lane would be reconstructed to provide as a raised landscaped median. One through-lane in the east bound direction would be eliminated, leaving only one through-lane in that direction. A 5 ft bike lane would be added in each direction.

Parking would be provided in the east bound direction.

Temporary Construction Easements would be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet the ADA requirements.
658
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
9 7.3 Alternative #3
Within State Right of Way
This alternative proposes to develop two distinct segments on PCH within the project limit. The first segment is between Aviation Blvd. and Artesia Blvd. and the second segment is between Aviation Blvd. and Anita St/Herondo St. The common design features between the two segments are: upgrading the sidewalks to meet the current ADA standards; eliminating the outside lane in each direction to provide space for two lanes with standard width of 11 ft; and providing permanent parking 9 ft wide in each direction.

The first segment would have a 5 ft bike lane in each direction and roundabouts proposed at PCH/Aviation Blvd., PCH/Pier Ave., and PCH/Artesia Blvd. The second segment would have raised landscaped median and left-turn lanes at various intersections.

Temporary Construction Easements would be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet the ADA requirements. Right of way acquisition would be required for construction of roundabouts.

Within City Right of Way
On Aviation Blvd. this alternative would remove protruding obstacles that limit the clear width of the sidewalks. Exposed utility lines would be buried underground. This alternative would add bike lanes on Aviation Blvd. within the project limits. It would eliminate one through-lane in the east bound direction. A roundabout would be added at the intersection of Aviation Blvd. and Prospect Ave.

Temporary Construction Easements would be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet the ADA requirements. Right of way acquisition would be required for construction of roundabouts.

7.4 Alternative #4
Within State Right of Way
This alternative is similar to Alternative 3 on PCH, except that a landscaped median would be constructed instead of the bike lanes.

Within City Right of Way
This alternative is similar to Alternative 3 on Aviation Blvd, except that a landscaped median would be constructed instead of the bike lanes.
659
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
10 7.5 Other Alternatives Considered
Road Diet with Bike Lanes:

This alternative proposes a road diet with bike lanes without roundabouts on PCH. It is similar to segment 2 in Alternative 3 (See attachment C - Typical Cross Sections, Alternative 3 - from Herondo St. to Aviation Blvd.), except that bike lanes would be provided instead of parking. This alternative should be explored further in PA&ED phase. Traffic impacts due to the elimination of the flexible lanes need to be studied in details. Design exception for non-standard shoulders would be needed.

Minimum Standard Alternative:

This alternative proposes upgrading the segment on PCH to the current design standards.

The existing right of way lines would be shifted by a total of 20 ft to the outside to provide space for standard lanes and shoulders. This alternative was discarded from further study due to its excessive cost for right of way acquisition.

7.6 Design Standards Risk Assessment
Alternative
Design Standard from
Highway Design Manual
Tables 82.1A & 82.1B
Probability of Design
Exception Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High,)
Justification for Probability Rating
2 Mandatory Lane Width
(HDM Section 301.1) Low
(Existing/Proposed lane width on
SR-1 is 10’)
This section of Route 1 is
Terminal Access (STAA). Further
evaluation is needed.
2 Mandatory Shoulder Width,
Right (HDM Section 302.1) Low
(Posted speed limit = 30mph
Existing/Proposed right shoulder
width on SR-1 is 0’)
This section of Route 1 is a
conventional multilane highway;
not an access control highway.

8. RIGHT‐OF‐WAY
Conceptual right-of-way cost estimates for each build alternative have been prepared. (See Attachment E)
660
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
11 9. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
Involved stakeholders in the development of the purpose and need of this project include Caltrans and the City of Hermosa Beach.

A Cooperative Agreement between Caltrans and the City of Hermosa Beach will be executed prior to commencement of project approval and environmental document (PA&ED) work.

A Maintenance Agreement for the segment on PCH will be required.

10. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/DOCUMENTATION
A Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) has been prepared to identify studies and capital outlay resources needed to complete the PA&ED phase. An Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) has been identified as the appropriate level environmental document for this project.

Alternatives 3 and 4 will require new right of way from private properties which may result in additional time needed to prepare the environmental document if there is project controversy regarding right of way. (See Attachment F)

11. FUNDING
Capital Outlay Project Estimate
Alternatives
Range of Estimate ($ Million) STIP Funds Other Funds
Construction Right-of-Way Construction Rightof-Way Construction Rightof-Way 1 State R/W 0 0

N/A N/A N/A N/A
City R/W 0 0
2 State R/W 14-15 7-10

N/A N/A N/A N/A
City R/W 3-4 6-8
3 State R/W 17-24 60-100

N/A N/A N/A N/A
City R/W 4-6 11-15
4 State R/W 18-26 60-100

N/A N/A N/A N/A
City R/W 4-7 11-15
The level of detail available to develop these capital outlay project estimates is only accurate to within the above ranges and is useful for long-range planning purposes only.

The capital outlay project estimates should not be used to program or commit Stateprogrammed capital outlay funds. 661
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
12 Capital Outlay Support Estimate
Capital outlay support cost for programming PA&ED for this project is estimated to be from $2 million to $3 million.

12. SCHEDULE
Project Milestones Scheduled Delivery Date
(Month/Day/Year)
PROGRAM PROJECT M015 02/02/2015
BEGIN ENVIRONMENTAL M020 07/01/2015
CIRCULATE DPR & DED EXTERNALLY M120 03/01/2017
PA&ED M200 08/01/2017
PROJECT PS&E M380 11/01/2019
RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION M410 01/01/2020
READY TO LIST M460 06/01/2020
AWARD M495 09/01/2020
APPROVE CONTRACT M500 11/01/2020
CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE M600 10/01/2021
END PROJECT M800 12/01/2022
The anticipated funding fiscal year for construction is 2019/2020.

13. RISKS
Risks are identified at the PSR-PDS level in the Risk Register (See Attachment H).

14. FHWA COORDINATION
This project is determined to be a “Delegated/Assigned Project” and is administered per the Project Responsibilities List in the Joint Stewardship and Oversight Agreement 2007 (Amended September 2010).

15. CONSTRUCTION PHASING
It was suggested to divide the project into multiple construction phases. Phase I could include the improvements on Aviation Blvd. between PCH and Prospect Ave. Phase II, or additional phases, could include the improvements on PCH between Herondo St. and Artesia Blvd.
662
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
13 16. DISTRICT CONTACTS
Office of Project Management:

Zoe Yue, Office Chief Phone (213)453-7566
Office of Project and Special Studies
James Vu, Project Engineer Phone (213)897-0116
Amir Elsharief, Sr. Transportation Engineer Phone (213)897-9565 Rafael Molina, Sr. Transportation Engineer Phone (213)897-7945 Elaheh Yadegar, Office Chief Phone (213)897-9635
Office of Right of Way Appraisals
Dan Murdoch, Office Chief Phone (213)897-1816

17. PROJECT REVIEWS
Caltrans
Office of Design ‘A’:

Richard Chiang, Acting Office Chief
Office of Environmental Planning:

Karl Price, Sr. Environmental Planner
Office of Traffic Engineering:

Yunus Ghausi, Sr. Transportation Engineer
Moe Bhuyian, Sr. Transportation Engineer
Office of Maintenance Engineering
Hamid Saadatnejadi, Office Chief
HQ Design
Brian Frazer, Design Reviewer
Peter Vacura, Design Coordinator

City of Hermosa Beach

Frank Bigdeli, Deputy Public Works Director
663
07-LA-1, PM 20.6/21.9, EA31500K
14 18. ATTACHMENTS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Schematic Maps

1. Alternative 1: No Build/Existing

2. Alternative 2

3. Alternative 3

4. Alternative 4
C. Typical Cross Sections
D. Capital Outlay Project Estimate
E. Right-of-Way Conceptual Cost Estimate Component
F. Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report
G. Storm Water Data Report
H. Risk Register
664
Attachment A
665

GLENDALE

ARCADIA
AZUSA
Malibu SANTA
MONICA

NORWALK
LONG
BEACH
POMONA

INDUSTRY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

VENTURA COUNTY

LOS ANGELES
ORANGE
COUNTY
COUNTY

PALMDALE

LANCASTER

SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Cerritos
Diamond
Bar ANGELES
LOS
14 14
138
118
5 18
138
2 2
39 39
210
10 30
60 57
71 210
72 60
164
19 42
5 110
105
710
605
10 10
2 110
101
210
210
5 405
170
134
210
2 405
90 27
2 1
91 1 405
1 405
213
107
19 1
605
5 47
126
126
5 KERN COUNTY

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
14 Pt. Dume

SISKIYOU MODOC

HUMBOLDT

TRINITY SHASTA LASSEN
TEHAMA

MENDOCINO

GLENN BUTTE
PLUMAS
SIERRA
NEVADA

PLACER YUBA
COLUSA
LAKE
YOLO

NAPA SONOMA

EL DORADO
MARIN
AMADOR
ALPINE

CALAVERAS
CONTRA
COSTA

TUOLUMNE MONO
SANTA
CLARA
SANTA
CRUZ

STANISLAUS

MARIPOSA
MERCED
MADERA
FRESNO

MONTEREY
INYO
TULARE
KINGS

OBISPO KERN
SANTA

BARBARA

VENTURA

LOS ANGELES

SAN BERNARDINO

RIVERSIDE

SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL
ORANGE
SOLANO

ALAMEDA
MENTO
SACRAJOAQUIN
SAN
SAN
LUIS
SUTTER

SAN FRANCISCO

SAN MATEO
DEL
NORTE

SAN BENITO
138
101
101

NOT TO SCALE

HAWTHORNE

PACIFIC
OCEAN

VICINITY MAP

PROJECT LOCATION
LA-1 (PM20.6/21.9)
EA 31500K
666
Attachment B
667
Alt. 1 No Build
_
S1.dgn 1/11/2015 1:46:08 PM
668
Alt. 1 No Build
_
S2.dgn 1/11/2015 1:46:46 PM
669
Alt. 1 No Build
_
S3.dgn 1/11/2015 1:47:54 PM
670
Alt.
1 No Build_S4.dgn 1/13/2015 12:53:04 PM
671
FEDEX
OFFICE
TUTTI

FRUITTI
YOGURT

LINDBERG

NUTRITION
CHASE
BANK

OCEAN POINT

BUSINESS BUILDING

CHUNG'S

CHINESE
CAFE
BEST
DONUTS

WILDFLOUR
PIZZA
HOPE
CHAPEL
HOPE
CHAPEL

PACIFIC PLAZA

SWEDISH

VACANT PRO-TECH
21ST ST.

OPEN
LOT
APT.

COMPLEX

MARINA BAY CLUB APARTMENTS LISZ DOM / PRO BIOS

SUNRISE OF HERMO
21ST ST.
20TH ST.
19TH ST. ARTESTIA BLVD.

HOTEL

HERMOSA
SPYDER

SURFBOARDS

AMERIPRISE

INTERNATIONAL

BUSINESS

BUILDING BUSINESS BUILDING
RP &
ASSOC.

BUSINESS

BUILDING
P. C. H.

GOULD AVE.
24TH PL.
24TH ST.

NEW MEDIAN STRIPNEW ROUND ABOUTNEW BIKE LANENEW PERMEABLE PAVERSNEW PEDESTRIAN SIGNAGE / WAYFINDING

VEHICULAR SIGNAGE / DIRECTIONAL
G
O

NEW PERMEABLE PAVERS
672

FREEDIVE &
SPEAR

SUPERCUTS

FRAME &
ART DEPT.

OCEAN
DINER
OCEAN DR. OCEAN DR.

QUALITY INN
& SUITES
AUBREY PARK CT.

RALPHS EL POLLO
INKA

CLEANERS

NAILS &
SPA

HERMOSA BEACH

CAR WASH

ET SURF

BIKE RENTAL
CASH 4
GOLD AVIATION BLVD.

OSA BEACH
18TH ST.

P. C. H.
17TH ST.
16TH ST.
15TH ST.
14TH ST.
13TH ST.
10TH ST.
9TH ST.
8TH PL.

JACK'S

SURFBOARDS
OCEAN

REALTORS

VCA COAST
ANIMAL

HOSPITAL

HOFFMAN/MURPHY

REALTORS

HAMPTON

INN & SUITES

HERMOSA
BEACH

HERMOSA

PAVILLION
AARON
BROS

CHIPOTLE
VONS

CVS PHARMACY
APT.

BUILDING
WELLS
FARGO
UNION
BANK
THE

COUNTER

LA SUNSET
TAN

AMERICA

TIRE DEPOT
VANS

SHOE STORE

ESSENCE
SPA

CLEANERS
LASER

TREATMENT
FUSION

SUSHI SKINNY

MINNY'S

COMMUNITY
CENTER
LAWNS

MEMORIAL

HERMOSA BEACH

COMMUNITY CENTER
ARCO

MCDONALD'S

DIALED IN

PERFORMANCE

SP EAGLE

PLUMBING
'WINDMILL' GREEN SPACE

BEACH CITIES

CHRISTIAN

FELLOWSHIP
MY FIT
FOODS
MOBIL

PINKBERRY

CASEY'S AUTO
DEALER

TAILOR TLC PHARMACY CLASSIC

TILE & MOSAIC

CLASSIC
TILE

HERMOSA

CELEBRATIONS
P. C. H.
16TH ST.
15TH ST. PIER AVE.
11TH PL.
11TH ST.
10TH ST.
9TH ST.
8TH PL
G G
OCEAN DR OCEAN DR. O
8TH PL. 8TH PL
O
OCEAN
I
E

ALTERNATI
673
8TH PL.
8TH ST.
7TH ST.
6TH ST.
5TH ST.
4TH ST.
3RD ST.
2ND ST.
1ST ST.

ANITA ST.

IC

G-IMPORTS
THE
TENDER
BOX

SASSY'S FRESH & EASY

EXPRESS

LEARNED
LUMBER

SOUTH BAY

UPHOLSTRY

SHERWIN

WILLIAMS
PAINT

FLOYD'S

BARBERSHOP

INSURANCE

BUILDING
JAMA

AUTO SERVICE

CASEY'S AUTO
DEALER
CA

MARKING
DEVICE

VACANT CAR WASH

FLEX CITY

FITNESS
DR.

AUTOTECH
AUTO
CENTER

SPECIAL

OCCAISIONS
CO.

CA

SUSHI &

TERIYAKI
A&M
AUTO
REPAIR
JUST

MASSAGE

TRIANGLE

HARDWARE

PAMPERED
TOT

COLLISION
CENTER

HERMOSA

ANIMAL HOSPITAL
HEART
& POLE
ALKA
WATER

WESTSIDE

RENTALS
NAILS
& SPA
PURPLE
HAZE

PINKIE'S BBQ /
KEBABS
7/11 GRACE DELI
MOMMA
MIA

OKI DOKI
SUSHI

BOW WOW

BOUTIQUE
3V
SIGNS
MOR

WIRELESS
FIFTY
& FIVE
COAST
LIQUOR

PACIFIC
COAST

LAUNDRY
JIM &
JACK'S
VACANT

FURNISHED
/ TATTOO

THE ROTH
GROUP
BOXING
WORKS
SB

JU-JITSU VACANT
POULET
DU
JOUR

VENTIVA /
ROYAL
NAILS
BEACH
CITIES
CYCLE

HERMOSA
SALOON

DOMINO'S

CVS PHARMACY

HOLIDAY INN

EXPRESS WEST
MARINE

HARMONY
YOGA

BUSINESS

BUILDING
EMPTY
LOT

REDONDO
BEACH

GATEWAY

PANACHE ROSA'S

HERMOSA

BARBER SHOP

COAST MUSIC

CONSERVATORY

ANYTIME

FITNESS
HAIR
STUDIO
PIER
& PIER
HAIR
ON THE
RUN

FELDER'S

BODY SHOP
SAINT
ROCKE

OKELL'S

FIREPLACE

VERIZON

SWITCHING

STATION SOUTH BAY

LAND ROVER

PETER'S

GARDEN CENTER
APT. BUILDING

PETER'S

GARDEN CENTER
(CONT'D)

CADENCE

HERMOSA BEACH CITY LIMIT

HERMOSA BEACH CITY LIMIT
HERONDO ST.

P. C. H.
8TH PL.
8TH ST.
6TH ST.
5TH ST.
4TH ST.
3RD ST.
2ND ST.
1ST PL.

G 1ST ST.

NEW MEDIAN STRIPNEW ROUND ABOUTNEW BIKE LANENEW PERMEABLE PAVERSNEW PEDESTRIAN SIGNAGE / WAYFINDING

VEHICULAR SIGNAGE / DIRECTIONAL
8TH PL. 8TH PL

NEW PERMEABLE PAVERS
I
674
PROSPECT AVE.

TERPLAN
DENTAL

OFFICES

FOREIGN CAR
REPAIR

ARTZONE
ACKBAR

YOU CAN
DANCE
ENERGY
YOGA
LA PAZ

WAYLAND &

VUKADINOVICH LLP
AVIATION BLVD. CORONA ST.

PROSPECT AVE.

G
PET
MART

OPEN LOT
HOME

AUTOMATOR
CHURCH

OF CHRIST
LUCKY
PLANTS

SOUTH BAY

FIRE EXTINGUISHER
OWOSSO AVE. OWOSSO AVE.

RESIDENCE
AIM
SPORTS

MEDICINE

THE CHICKEN
SHACK

SPLINTERED
HEART
VACANT
HERBAL

REGENISIS
CARPET

SPECTRUM

DIVERSITY
SALON
BONNIE BRAE ST.

OCEAN
TIRE
DOG

GROOMING

FEED THE

MACHINE
TATTOO
OCEAN DR. OCEAN DR.

ROUND ABOUT O
HARPER ST.

OCEAN DR OCEAN DR.

O
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
Attachment C
684
685
686
Attachment D
687
Project Study Report - Project Development Support
Capital Outlay Project Estimate
Dist - Co - Rte 07-LA-1
PM 20.6/21.9
Program Code 20.XX.400.100
Project Number 0715000162
Month/Year 01/2015
Project Description:

Limits:

On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.621) and Artesia Boulevard (PM 21.919).

On Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue.

Proposed Improvement (Scope):

Alternative 2
State Right of Way
Summary of Project Cost Estimate
Cost (Low) Cost (High)
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $14,080,000 $14,080,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $0 $0
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $512,000 $848,000
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $14,592,000 $14,928,000
RIGHT OF WAY $7,100,000 $9,900,000
TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS $21,692,000 $24,828,000 USE $21,000,000 $25,000,000
. Underground utility lines; Reconstruct sidewalks; Construct landscaped median 688
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Access Improvements $ 2,992,000 $ 2,992,000

2. Trafic Signal and Lighting Improvements $ 6,800,000 $ 6,800,000

3. Landscape $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000

4. Sidewalk Improvements $ 2,288,000 $ 2,288,000

5. Utility Relocation/Undergrounding $ See RoW $ See RoW

6. Traveled way Improvements, Roundabouts $ NA $ NA
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 14,080,000 $ 14,080,000
Note: Roadway items include demolition, earthwork, structural section, drainage, landscape specialty items, traffic items, minor items, mobilization, TMP, and contingencies II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Structure Name Cost (Low) Cost (High)
N/A $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $ 0 $ 0
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Hazardous Materials $ 80,000 $ 400,000

2. Storm Water (DPP, Construction Site) $ 432,000 $ 448,000 TOTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $ 512,000 $ 848,000
See Attachment E
IV. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)
A. Acquisition, including excess lands,… $ 0 $ 0
B. Temporary Construction Easement $ 600,000 $ 900,000
C. Utility Relocation / Undergrounding $ 6,500,000 $ 9,000,000 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS $ 7,100,000 $ 9,900,000
See Attachment G
689
Project Study Report - Project Development Support
Capital Outlay Project Estimate
Dist - Co - Rte 07-LA-1
PM 20.6/21.9
Program Code 20.XX.400.100
Project Number 0715000162
Month/Year 01/2015
Project Description:

Limits:

On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.621) and Artesia Boulevard (PM 21.919).

On Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue.

Proposed Improvement (Scope):

Alternative 3
State Right of Way
Summary of Project Cost Estimate
Cost (Low) Cost (High)
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $15,280,000 $18,336,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $0 $0
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $2,080,000 $5,360,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $17,360,000 $23,696,000
RIGHT OF WAY $60,600,000 $99,400,000
TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS $77,960,000 $123,096,000 USE $78,000,000 $123,000,000
. Relocate/underground utility lines; Reconstruct sidewalks; Construct roundabouts; Remove median; Cold plane and AC Overlay
690
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Access Improvements $ 2,720,000 $ 3,264,000

2. Trafic Signal and Lighting Improvements $ 5,600,000 $ 6,720,000

3. Landscape $ 1,920,000 $ 2,304,000

4. Sidewalk Improvements $ 2,400,000 $ 2,880,000

5. Utility Relocation/Undergrounding $ See RoW $ See RoW

6. Traveled way Improvements, Roundabouts $ 2,640,000 $ 3,168,000.0 TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 15,280,000 $ 18,336,000
Note: Roadway items include demolition, earthwork, structural section, drainage, landscape specialty items, traffic items, minor items, mobilization, TMP, and contingencies II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Structure Name Cost (Low) Cost (High)
N/A $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $ 0 $ 0
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Hazardous Materials $ 1,600,000 $ 4,800,000

2. Storm Water (DPP, Construction Site) $ 480,000 $ 560,000 TOTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $ 2,080,000 $ 5,360,000
See Attachment E
IV. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)
A. Acquisition, including excess lands,… $ 55,000,000 $ 82,500,000 B. Temporary Construction Easement $ 600,000 $ 900,000
C. Utility Relocation / Undergrounding $ 5,000,000 $ 16,000,000 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS $ 60,600,000 $ 99,400,000
See Attachment G
691
Project Study Report - Project Development Support
Capital Outlay Project Estimate
Dist - Co - Rte 07-LA-1
PM 20.6/21.9
Program Code 20.XX.400.100
Project Number 0715000162
Month/Year 01/2015
Project Description:

Limits:

On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.621) and Artesia Boulevard (PM 21.919).

On Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue.

Proposed Improvement (Scope):

Alternative 4
State Right of Way
Summary of Project Cost Estimate
Cost (Low) Cost (High)
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $16,720,000 $20,064,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $0 $0
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $2,120,000 $5,440,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $18,840,000 $25,504,000
RIGHT OF WAY $60,600,000 $99,400,000
TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS $79,440,000 $124,904,000 USE $80,000,000 $125,000,000
. Relocate/underground utility lines; Reconstruct sidewalks; Construct roundabouts; Reconstruct median; Cold plane and AC Overlay
692
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Access Improvements $ 3,040,000 $ 3,648,000

2. Trafic Signal and Lighting Improvements $ 6,080,000 $ 7,296,000

3. Landscape $ 2,800,000 $ 3,360,000

4. Sidewalk Improvements $ 2,400,000 $ 2,880,000

5. Utility Relocation/Undergrounding $ See RoW $ See RoW

6. Traveled way Improvements, Roundabouts $ 2,400,000 $ 2,880,000.0 TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 16,720,000 $ 20,064,000
Note: Roadway items include demolition, earthwork, structural section, drainage, landscape specialty items, traffic items, minor items, mobilization, TMP, and contingencies II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Structure Name Cost (Low) Cost (High)
N/A $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $ 0 $ 0
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Hazardous Materials $ 1,600,000 $ 4,800,000

2. Storm Water (DPP, Construction Site) $ 520,000 $ 640,000 TOTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $ 2,120,000 $ 5,440,000
See Attachment E
IV. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)
A. Acquisition, including excess lands,… $ 55,000,000 $ 82,500,000 B. Temporary Construction Easement $ 600,000 $ 900,000
C. Utility Relocation / Undergrounding $ 5,000,000 $ 16,000,000 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS $ 60,600,000 $ 99,400,000
See Attachment G
693
Project Study Report - Project Development Support
Capital Outlay Project Estimate
Dist - Co - Rte 07-LA-1
PM 20.6/21.9
Program Code 20.XX.400.100
Project Number 0715000162
Month/Year 01/2015
Project Description:

Limits:

On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.621) and Artesia Boulevard (PM 21.919).

On Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue.

Proposed Improvement (Scope):

Alternative 2
City Right of Way
Summary of Project Cost Estimate
Cost (Low) Cost (High)
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $3,520,000 $3,520,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $0 $0
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $128,000 $212,000
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $3,648,000 $3,732,000
RIGHT OF WAY $6,660,000 $7,940,000
TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS $10,308,000 $11,672,000 USE $10,000,000 $12,000,000
. Underground utility lines; Reconstruct sidewalks; Construct landscaped median 694
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Access Improvements $ 748,000 $ 748,000

2. Trafic Signal and Lighting Improvements $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000

3. Landscape $ 500,000 $ 500,000

4. Sidewalk Improvements $ 572,000 $ 572,000

5. Utility Relocation/Undergrounding $ See RoW $ See RoW

6. Traveled way Improvements, Roundabouts $ NA $ NA
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 3,520,000 $ 3,520,000
Note: Roadway items include demolition, earthwork, structural section, drainage, landscape specialty items, traffic items, minor items, mobilization, TMP, and contingencies II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Structure Name Cost (Low) Cost (High)
N/A $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $ 0 $ 0
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Hazardous Materials $ 20,000 $ 100,000

2. Storm Water (DPP, Construction Site) $ 108,000 $ 112,000 TOTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $ 128,000 $ 212,000
See Attachment E
IV. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)
A. Acquisition, including excess lands,… $ 0 $ 0
B. Temporary Construction Easement $ 160,000 $ 240,000
C. Utility Relocation / Undergrounding $ 6,500,000 $ 7,700,000 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS $ 6,660,000 $ 7,940,000
See Attachment G
695
Project Study Report - Project Development Support
Capital Outlay Project Estimate
Dist - Co - Rte 07-LA-1
PM 20.6/21.9
Program Code 20.XX.400.100
Project Number 0715000162
Month/Year 01/2015
Project Description:

Limits:

On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.621) and Artesia Boulevard (PM 21.919).

On Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue.

Proposed Improvement (Scope):

Alternative 3
City Right of Way
Summary of Project Cost Estimate
Cost (Low) Cost (High)
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $3,820,000 $4,584,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $0 $0
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $520,000 $1,340,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $4,340,000 $5,924,000
RIGHT OF WAY $11,160,000 $14,840,000
TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS $15,500,000 $20,764,000 USE $15,000,000 $21,000,000
. Relocate/underground utility lines; Reconstruct sidewalks; Construct roundabouts; Remove median; Cold plane and AC Overlay
696
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Access Improvements $ 680,000 $ 816,000

2. Trafic Signal and Lighting Improvements $ 1,400,000 $ 1,680,000

3. Landscape $ 480,000 $ 576,000

4. Sidewalk Improvements $ 600,000 $ 720,000

5. Utility Relocation/Undergrounding $ See RoW $ See RoW

6. Traveled way Improvements, Roundabouts $ 660,000 $ 792,000.0 TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 3,820,000 $ 4,584,000
Note: Roadway items include demolition, earthwork, structural section, drainage, landscape specialty items, traffic items, minor items, mobilization, TMP, and contingencies II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Structure Name Cost (Low) Cost (High)
N/A $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $ 0 $ 0
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Hazardous Materials $ 400,000 $ 1,200,000

2. Storm Water (DPP, Construction Site) $ 120,000 $ 140,000 TOTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $ 520,000 $ 1,340,000
See Attachment E
IV. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)
A. Acquisition, including excess lands,… $ 4,000,000 $ 6,000,000 B. Temporary Construction Easement $ 160,000 $ 240,000
C. Utility Relocation / Undergrounding $ 7,000,000 $ 8,600,000 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS $ 11,160,000 $ 14,840,000
See Attachment G
697
Project Study Report - Project Development Support
Capital Outlay Project Estimate
Dist - Co - Rte 07-LA-1
PM 20.6/21.9
Program Code 20.XX.400.100
Project Number 0715000162
Month/Year 01/2015
Project Description:

Limits:

On PCH between Anita Street/Herondo Street (PM 20.621) and Artesia Boulevard (PM 21.919).

On Aviation Boulevard between PCH and Prospect Avenue.

Proposed Improvement (Scope):

Alternative 4
City Right of Way
Summary of Project Cost Estimate
Cost (Low) Cost (High)
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $4,180,000 $5,016,000
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $0 $0
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $530,000 $1,360,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $4,710,000 $6,376,000
RIGHT OF WAY $11,160,000 $14,840,000
TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS $15,870,000 $21,216,000 USE $16,000,000 $22,000,000
. Relocate/underground utility lines; Reconstruct sidewalks; Construct roundabouts; Reconstruct median; Cold plane and AC Overlay
698
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Access Improvements $ 760,000 $ 912,000

2. Trafic Signal and Lighting Improvements $ 1,520,000 $ 1,824,000

3. Landscape $ 700,000 $ 840,000

4. Sidewalk Improvements $ 600,000 $ 720,000

5. Utility Relocation/Undergrounding $ See RoW $ See RoW

6. Traveled way Improvements, Roundabouts $ 600,000 $ 720,000.0 TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS $ 4,180,000 $ 5,016,000
Note: Roadway items include demolition, earthwork, structural section, drainage, landscape specialty items, traffic items, minor items, mobilization, TMP, and contingencies II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Structure Name Cost (Low) Cost (High)
N/A $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS $ 0 $ 0
III. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)

1. Hazardous Materials $ 400,000 $ 1,200,000

2. Storm Water (DPP, Construction Site) $ 130,000 $ 160,000 TOTAL MITIGATION ITEMS $ 530,000 $ 1,360,000
See Attachment E
IV. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
Items Cost (Low) Cost (High)
A. Acquisition, including excess lands,… $ 4,000,000 $ 6,000,000 B. Temporary Construction Easement $ 160,000 $ 240,000
C. Utility Relocation / Undergrounding $ 7,000,000 $ 8,600,000 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS $ 11,160,000 $ 14,840,000
See Attachment G
699
Attachment E
700
State of California California State Transportation Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Amir Elsharief , Design Manager
Program Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
From: Dan Murdoch, Office Chief
Right of Way Appraisals, and Planning & Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
07-LA-1-PMPM 20.6/21.9
Project ID #
EA: 31500K
Data Sheet ID NO: ds1183
A Field Review was conducted
Scope of the Right of Way
Right of Way Required
Number of Parcels
Type of Parcels
Land Area: Fee: Easement:

Displaced Persons/Businesses
Demolition/Clearance
Railroad Involvement
Support Costs
Cost Estimates
Capital Costs
Schedule
Right of Way will require 18 months to deliver a Right of Way Certification #1 from Final R/W Maps. This estimate is based on a Right of Way Certification date of 10/1/20.

Yes
Yes
51-100
Suburban
No
No
No
Utility Involvement Yes
$2,500,000 - $3,500,000
$7,000,000 - $10,000,000
The Right of Way cost contains an estimate for the proposed undergrounding of utilities within the project limits. It is assumed that these utilities will remain within the public right of way, and that no new right of way will be required for the undergrounding.

Undergrounding estimated at $8,600,000.00
The estimator was provided with very preliminary plans and maps, which may ultimately be significantly revised, resulting in this conceptual cost estimate to be modified and updated.

Areas of Concern
Date: 1/9/15
701
State of California California State Transportation Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Amir Elsharief , Design Manager
Program Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
From: Dan Murdoch, Office Chief
Right of Way Appraisals, and Planning & Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
07-LA-1-PMPM 20.6/21.9
Project ID #
EA: 31500K
Data Sheet ID NO: ds1182
A Field Review was conducted
Scope of the Right of Way
Right of Way Required
Number of Parcels
Type of Parcels
Land Area: Fee: Easement:

Displaced Persons/Businesses
Demolition/Clearance
Railroad Involvement
Support Costs
Cost Estimates
Capital Costs
Schedule
Right of Way will require 36 months to deliver a Right of Way Certification #1 from Final R/W Maps. This estimate is based on a Right of Way Certification date of 10/1/20.

Yes
Yes
>100
Suburban
Yes
Yes
No
Utility Involvement Yes
$4,500,000 - $6,000,000
$60,000,001 - $100,000,000
The Right of Way cost contains an estimate for the proposed undergrounding of utilities within the project limits. It is assumed that these utilities will remain within the public right of way, and that no new right of way will be required for the undergroudning.

Undergrounding estimated at $8,600,000.00
The estimator was provided with very preliminary plans and maps, which may ultimately be significantly revised, resulting in this conceptual cost estimate to be modified and updated.

Areas of Concern
Date: 1/9/15
702
State of California California State Transportation Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Amir Elsharief , Design Manager
Program Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
From: Dan Murdoch, Office Chief
Right of Way Appraisals, and Planning & Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
07-LA-1-PMPM 20.6/21.9
Project ID #
EA: 31500K
Data Sheet ID NO: ds1181
A Field Review was conducted
Scope of the Right of Way
Right of Way Required
Number of Parcels
Type of Parcels
Land Area: Fee: Easement:

Displaced Persons/Businesses
Demolition/Clearance
Railroad Involvement
Support Costs
Cost Estimates
Capital Costs
Schedule
Right of Way will require 36 months to deliver a Right of Way Certification #1 from Final R/W Maps. This estimate is based on a Right of Way Certification date of 10/1/20.

Yes
Yes
>100
Suburban
Yes
Yes
No
Utility Involvement Yes
$4,500,000 - $6,000,000
$60,000,001-$100,000,000
The Right of Way cost contains an estimate for the proposed undergrounding of utilities within the project limits. It is assumed that these utilities will remain within the public right of way, and that no new right of way will be required for the undergrounding.

Undergrounding estimated at $8,600,000.00
The estimator was provided with very preliminary plans and maps, which may ultimately be significantly revised, resulting in this conceptual cost estimate to be modified and updated.

Areas of Concern
Date: 1/9/15
703
State of California California State Transportation Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Amir Elsharief , Design Manager
Program Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
From: Dan Murdoch, Office Chief
Right of Way Appraisals, and Planning & Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
07-LA-Aviation Blvd-PMBtwn Prospect
& Pacific Coast Highway
Project ID # 0715000162
EA: 31500K Alt. 2 Aviation Blvd.

Data Sheet ID NO: ds1196
A Field Review was conducted
Scope of the Right of Way
Right of Way Required
Number of Parcels
Type of Parcels
Land Area: Fee: Easement:

Displaced Persons/Businesses
Demolition/Clearance
Railroad Involvement
Support Costs
Cost Estimates
Capital Costs
Schedule
Right of Way will require 30 months to deliver a Right of Way Certification #1 from Final R/W Maps. This estimate is based on a Right of Way Certification date of 6/15/17.

Yes
26-50
Suburban
Yes
Yes
No
Utility Involvement Yes
$1,300,000.00 - $1,800,000.00
$6,750,000.00 - $8,000,000.00
The Right of Way cost contains an estimate for the proposed undergrounding of utilities within the project limits. It is assumed that these utilities will remain within the public Right of Way, and that no new right of way will be required for the undergrounding.

According to information provided to the estimator, pole lines are located on both sides of Aviation Blvd. Therefore this estimate includes undergrounding for both sides of the street.

Undergrounding estimated at $6,500,000.00
The estimator was provided with very preliminary plans and maps, which may ultimately be significantly revised, resulting in the need for this conceptual cost estimate to be modified and updated.

Areas of Concern
Date: 1/20/15
704
State of California California State Transportation Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Amir Elsharief , Design Manager
Program Manager
District 7, Los Angeles Office
From: Dan Murdoch, Office Chief
Right of Way Appraisals, and Planning & Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
07-LA-Aviation Blvd-PMProspect /
Pacific Coast Highway
Project ID # 0715000162
EA: 31500K Alt. 3 Aviation Blvd.

Data Sheet ID NO: ds1191
A Field Review was conducted
Scope of the Right of Way
Right of Way Required
Number of Parcels
Type of Parcels
Land Area: Fee: Easement:

Displaced Persons/Businesses
Demolition/Clearance
Railroad Involvement
Support Costs
Cost Estimates
Capital Costs
Schedule
Right of Way will require 30 months to deliver a Right of Way Certification #1 from Final R/W Maps. This estimate is based on a Right of Way Certification date of 6/15/17.

Yes
Yes
26-50
Suburban
Yes
Yes
No
Utility Involvement Yes
$1,400,000.00 - $2,000,000.00
$11,000,000.00 - $15,000,000.00
The Right of Way cost contains an estimate for the proposed undergrounding of utilities within the project limits. It is assumed that these utilities will remain within the public Right of Way, and that no new right of way will be required for the undergrounding.

According to information provided to the estimator, pole lines are located on both sides of Aviation Blvd. Therefore this estimate includes undergrounding for both sides of the street.

Undergrounding estimated at $6,500,000.00
The estimator was provided with very preliminary plans and maps, which may ultimately be significantly revised, resulting in the need for this conceptual cost estimate to be modified and updated.

Areas of Concern
Date: 1/20/15
705
State of California California State Transportation Agency

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Amir Elsharief , Design Manager
Program Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
From: Dan Murdoch, Office Chief
Right of Way Appraisals, and Planning & Management
District 7, Los Angeles Office
07-LA-Aviation Blvd-PMProspect /
Pacific Coast Highway
Project ID # 0715000162
EA: 31500K Alt. 4 Aviation
Data Sheet ID NO: ds1190
A Field Review was conducted
Scope of the Right of Way
Right of Way Required
Number of Parcels
Type of Parcels
Land Area: Fee: Easement:

Displaced Persons/Businesses
Demolition/Clearance
Railroad Involvement
Support Costs
Cost Estimates
Capital Costs
Schedule
Right of Way will require 30 months to deliver a Right of Way Certification #1 from Final R/W Maps. This estimate is based on a Right of Way Certification date of 6/15/17.

Yes
Yes
26-50
Suburban
Yes
Yes
No
Utility Involvement Yes
$1,400,000.00 - $2,000,000.00
$11,000,000.00 - $15,000,000.00
The Right of Way cost contains an estimate for the proposed undergrounding of utilities within the project limits. It is assumed that these utilities will remain within the public Right of Way, and that no new right of way will be required for the undergrounding.

According to information provided to the estimator, pole lines are located on both sides of Aviation Blvd. Therefore this estimate includes undergrounding for both sides of the street.

Undergrounding estimated at $6,500,000.00
The estimator was provided with very preliminary plans and maps, which may ultimately be significantly revised, resulting in the need for this conceptual cost estimate to be modified and updated.

Areas of Concern
Date: 1/20/15
706
Attachment F
707
Revised April 2011

PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS REPORT

1. Project Information
District
07 County
LA
Route
1 PM

20.62/21.92
EA
31500K
Project Title: PCH/Hermosa Beach Improvement Project Alternative Proposals Project Manager
Zoe Yue
Phone #
213-897-1051
Project Engineer
James Vu
Phone #
213-897-0116
Environmental Office Chief/Manager
Karl Price
Phone #
213-897-1839
PEAR Preparer
Christine Lan
Phone #
213-897-2936

2. Project Description
Purpose and Need
The City of Hermosa Beach has proposed a highway improvement project on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH/LA-1) between Herondo Street/Anita Street (PM 20.6) and Artesia Boulevard (PM 21.9). The project will also include Aviation Blvd between the intersections of Prospect Ave/Aviation Blvd and PCH/ Aviation Blvd. The purpose of this project is to incorporate complete street features, improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility, beautify the roadway, enhance traffic safety, and fulfill Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.

The project is needed for four reasons: 1) the existing sidewalk is not ADA compliant, is in poor condition, and is generally narrow with protruding obstacles (i.e. utility poles) which discourages pedestrian use of the sidewalks, 2) there is no existing bike access on this section of PCH, 3) the bus stops are small and lack visibility, 4) the existing travel lanes are at non-standard widths and the intersection geometrics are inadequate for u-turn movements, hindering traffic flow.

Description of Work
All build alternatives will likely include right of way acquisition, demolition, earthwork, cold planing, grading, concrete work, re-striping, traffic control, staging, storm water BMPs and General BMPs.

Alternatives
There are three build alternatives and a no build alternative that are being considered:

Alternative 1: No-build
708
Revised April 2011
This alternative will maintain the existing facility in its current condition.

Alternative 2:

Within State Right of Way
This alternative will beautify Pacific Coast Highway and upgrade the existing sidewalks to ADA standards. Protruding obstacles that limit the clear width of the sidewalks will be removed and exposed utility lines will be buried underground. The existing two-way left turn lane will be reconstructed to provide space for a raised landscaped median. This alternative will maintain the existing travel lanes in their current condition.

Temporary Construction Easements will be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet ADA requirements.

Within City Right of Way
On Aviation Blvd this alternative would remove protruding obstacles that limit the clear width of the sidewalks and exposed utility lines will be buried underground. The existing twoway left turn lane will be reconstructed to provide space for a raised landscaped median. One through-lane in the east bound direction will be eliminated, leaving only one through-lane in that direction. A 5ft bike lane will be added in each direction and parking will be provided on the side of the east bound direction.

Temporary Construction Easements will be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet ADA requirements.

Alternative 3:

Within State Right of Way
This alternative proposes to develop two distinct segments on PCH within the project limit. The first segment is between Aviation Blvd and Artesia Blvd and the second segment is between Aviation Blvd and Anita St/Herondo St. Common design features between the two segments are: upgrading the sidewalks to current ADA standards; eliminating the outside (#3) lane in each direction to provide space for two lanes with standard widths of 11ft and providing permanent parking (9 ft wide) in each direction.

The first segment (between Aviation Blvd and Artesia Blvd) would have 5ft bike lanes in each direction and roundabouts proposed at the following intersections: PCH/Aviation Blvd, PCH/Pier Ave. and PCH/Artesia Blvd. The second segment (between Aviation Blvd and Anita St/Herondo St.) will have raised landscaped median and left-turn lanes at various intersections.

Temporary Construction Easements will be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet the ADA requirements. Right of way acquisition will be required for construction of roundabouts. Utility obstacles along the sidewalks will be relocated underground.

Within City Right of Way
On Aviation Blvd this alternative would remove protruding obstacles that limit the clear width of the sidewalks and exposed utility lines will be buried underground. One through-lane in the east bound direction will be eliminated, leaving only one through-lane in that direction. A 5ft bike lane will be added in each direction and parking will be provided on the side of the east bound direction. A roundabout will be added at the intersection of Aviation Blvd andProspect Ave.

Right of way acquisition will be required to construct the roundabout. Temporary Construction Easements will be required for adjusting driveways along the sidewalk to meet the ADA requirements.
709
Revised April 2011
Alternative 4
This alternative is similar to alternative 3, except that a landscaped median would be constructed instead of the bike lanes throughout the project area on both PCH and Aviation Blvd.

710
Revised April 2011

3. Anticipated Environmental Approval
Check the anticipated environmental determination or document for the proposed project in the table below.

CEQA NEPA
Environmental Determination
Statutory Exemption
Categorical Exemption Categorical Exclusion
Environmental Document
Initial Study or Focused Initial Study
with proposed Negative Declaration
(ND) or Mitigated ND
Routine Environmental Assessment
with proposed Finding of No
Significant Impact
Complex Environmental Assessment
with proposed Finding of No
Significant Impact
Environmental Impact Report Environmental Impact Statement CEQA Lead Agency (if determined): California Department of Transportation
Estimated length of time (months) to obtain environmental approval:
24 months
Estimated person hours to complete identified tasks: See Attachment B

4. Special Environmental Considerations
Alternatives 3 and 4 will require new right of way from private properties which may result in additional time needed to prepare the environmental document if there is project controversy regarding right of way.

5. Anticipated Environmental Commitments
Lead Compliance Plan (LCP)
Work Plan (WP)
Contractors will devise a work plan to address health and safety of workers performing the task of removal, containment, storage, and disposal of yellow thermoplastic and lead-based painted traffic stripe and pavement marking.

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
SWPPP will be required if the soil disturbance area is more than 1 acre.

Day Time Work Window
Potential day time work windows and limited night time construction due to noise concerns for adjacent residential areas.

Cultural Pre-Construction Survey
A Pre-Construction Survey is required for any uninvestigated areas within the APE to determine the presence of archeological resources.

Biology Pre-Construction Survey
711
Revised April 2011
A Pre-Construction Survey is required to determine if any endangered/threatened species is within the project impact area.

Endangered Species Sighting and Construction Halting
If any state and federal species are sighted during construction then all construction activities will cease and the district biologist will be notified immediately. Work should not resume until clearance is given by the district biologist.

Work Window and Biologist Monitor for Nesting Birds
No vegetation removal should take place between February 15th and September 1st if at all possible. A qualified biology monitor should be on site to monitor any vegetation removal activity. If nesting birds are observed before or during vegetation removal then all vegetation removal activities will be halted until it is determined that the fledglings have left the nest.

Nesting birds may not be impacted by any construction activity including noise and dust pollution or the destruction of habitat.

Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Best Management Practices should be implemented to the Maximum Extent Practicable. They will be in place before and during project construction to avoid any water quality impacts. If at any time work, debris, or staging of equipment shall occur inside any channel, drainage, stream, rivers, or creek beds, the environmental division must be notified immediately.

6. Permits and Approvals
Local Coastal Development Permit (to be determined)- A short section of the project’s south side post mile extends into the local coastal jurisdiction. The need for this permit will be determined during the next phase.

7. Level of Effort: Risks and Assumptions
Assumptions:
 Study limits and design alternatives have been properly identified by the City of Hermosa Beach and Caltrans’ design team and will remain unchanged throughout the project study duration.  The environmental document level identified in this report has been determined based on a preliminary evaluation of the project. However, it is impossible to foresee all project impacts at the preliminary project study stage. If additional unforeseen impacts arise a higher level environmental document may be required.
 There will be sufficient opportunities to address public concerns.

Risks:
 Additional right of way and relocation is needed for alternatives 3 and 4 of this project which may create public controversy for the project. Opposition from landowners may elevate the level of environmental document needed and will increase the time and cost needed to complete the project.
 Delays in obtaining a full description of engineering design details and other materials that are needed for environmental studies or permitting can cause additional delays.  Delays from outside agencies in responding and processing permits can cause additional delays.

712
Revised April 2011

8. PEAR Technical Summaries

8.1 Land Use: No Effect

8.2 Growth: No Effect

8.3 Farmlands/Timberlands: No Effect

8.4 Community Impacts:

Based on the current project scope there will be substantial impacts to the community due to the acquiring of right of way from adjacent properties. 16 properties will be permanently impacted by alternatives 3 and 4 and relocation will be required for many of the properties.

The project is also expected to impact numerous driveways to existing housing along PCH and Aviation Blvd. A Community Impacts Assessment will be needed along with a Relocation Study.

The installation of roundabouts proposed by alternatives 3 and 4 is somewhat controversial within the PDT and will likely generate controversy among the local residents and business owners. There is also concern that the roundabouts could adversely affect access to businesses within the project area and create an economic hardship. It has also been suggested by the City of Hermosa Beach that this may set a precedent that other adjacent cities will want to emulate, thereby potentially increasing whatever impacts (positive or negative) their construction may cause.

This determination is based on approximate project footprint maps. Actual impact of the surrounding area will be determined in later phases when right of way data is available.

8.5 Visual/Aesthetics:

The project is expected to have a positive effect on Visual and Aesthetics with the addition of landscaped medians and roundabouts. A study on visual and aesthetics can be requested during the PAED phase to assess for the project improvements.

8.6 Cultural Resources:

According to the current project scope this project has low archaeological sensitivity. There are no archaeological sites within or adjacent to the project based on the district 7 records search. Any uninvestigated areas within the APE should be surveyed by a qualified archaeologist prior to project approval. The estimated time for cultural review is one to three months.

8.7 Hydrology and Floodplain:

The project location is outside of the 100 Year Flood Zones in the USA based on a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zones search.

8.8 Water Quality and Storm Water Runoff:
713
Revised April 2011
The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is a document that addresses water pollution control for a construction project. The Construction General Permit (CGP) requires that all storm water discharges associated with construction activity, where said activity results in soil disturbance of one acre or more of land area, must be permitted under the CGP and have a fully developed site SWPPP on-site prior to beginning any soil disturbing activities. Caltrans may require the development of a SWPPP for projects with disturbed soil areas of less than 1 acre if it is determined that the project possesses a significant water quality risk.

All of the build alternatives will be subject to the same requirements.

8.9 Geology, Soils, Seismic and Topography:

A geotechnical review of the project area will be required during PA/ED to fully evaluate potential effects.

8.10 Paleontology: No Effect

8.11 Hazardous Waste/Materials:

It is recommended that a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) be prepared in accordance with ASTM guideline during the PAED/PS&E Phase to identify potential recognized environmental conditions (RECs) for the intersections specifically related to new R/W acquisition and construction activities.

Additionally, for new R/W acquisition purposes, it will be necessary to conduct a Phase II environmental site investigation (SI) for the parcels that are located within the reported REC sites. The SI must provide sufficient information to address the lateral extent and maximum depth of proposed excavation and proposed acquisition type (fees/easements).

Project concerns include:
 25 recognized environmental conditions (RECs) sites were reported within 1,000 feet radius search from the project footprint.
 Yellow thermoplastic/paint striping that needs to be removed may contain lead and chromium at concentrations that are considered hazardous. The level of lead and chromium will be analyzed during later project phases to determine if the product needs to be disposed at a Class I facility.
 Roadway Improvements and Utility Relocation: These improvements will involve excavation work. A Phase II environmental SI shall be conducted that provides sufficient information to address the lateral extent and maximum depth of proposed excavation for all roadway improvements and utility relocation work.  Right of Entry Permit and Property Access: Before Caltrans/consultant can access properties to conduct the recommended Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Phase II Site Investigation, “Permit to Enter” permits (Permits) shall be required. It is important that the Permits must be obtained as early as possible to minimize project delay as the process can take up to 18 months to complete.

8.12 Air Quality:
714
Revised April 2011
Based on the current project’s scope of work the proposed project is not exempt from conformity requirements according to 40 CFR 93.126-128. The proposed project must be included in the latest conforming Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) to satisfy regional conformity requirements and a conformity analysis should be prepared to demonstrate conformity at the project level.

The project is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) which has the following pollutant attainment status:

Federal Status State Status
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Nonattainment Nonattainment
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Nonattainment Nonattainment
Carbon Monoxide (CO) Maintenance Attainment
ozone Nonattainment Nonattainment
PM10 Maintenance Nonattainment
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
Lead Nonattainment Nonattainment
For projects in areas that are in maintenance or nonattainment of federal standards for CO, PM10, or PM2.5, a hot-spot analysis is required for CO, PM10, or PM2.5 in accordance with the US EPA transportation conformity regulations for projects that are not considered exempt pursuant to 40 CFR 93.126.

Los Angeles County, where the proposed project is located, is within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is an attainment-maintenance area for PM10 and non-attainment for PM2.5. Per the EPA’s final rule, for projects located in a PM nonattainment and maintenance area, an Interagency Consultation is required as part of the demonstration of transportation conformity requirements. The Interagency Coordination takes the form of the SCAG Transportation Conformity Working Group (TCWG), which includes representatives from Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Air Resource Board (ARB), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and other local and state partners.

The proposed project is located within the boundary of SCAB; therefore, this project must comply with, among others, the SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Implementation Rule 403 to minimize temporary emissions during construction of the project as applicable and appropriate.

It is requested that the AQB be informed of any further changes to the proposed scope or the class of action determined for this project. Such changes may require an update or reassessment of air quality issues for the proposed project.

8.13 Noise and Vibration:

The project is located in a densely populated area adjacent to residential and commercial facilities. A number of sensitive receptors (e.g., schools) are located within 1000 feet. A Noise Study will be required during PAED to assess potential construction impacts. 715
Revised April 2011

8.14 Energy and Climate Change:

Improved traffic circulation, reduced traffic flow, and multimodal access will reduce the amount of vehicular traffic at this section of the roadway. All of the build alternatives are expected to result in a slight reduction in energy and vehicular usage and therefore a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

8.15 Biological Environment:

Based on the current project scope, impacts to biological resources are expected to be minimal because the immediate vicinity of the project is highly disturbed.

However, there are 11 state and/or federally listed threatened/endangered wildlife species in the areas adjacent to the project area. There are also four listed threatened/endangered plant species. There is no critical habitat in this area. The high number of threatened/endangered species is due to the project’s close proximity to the Pacific Ocean’s shore.

Additional evaluation of impacts on listed and sensitive bird species will be needed during the PA/ED phase of the project. Biology review is expected to take approximately six to nine months to deliver should biological surveys and endangered species consultation be required.

8.16 Cumulative Impacts: No Effect

8.17 Context Sensitive Solutions:

This project provides a transportation system that enhances the place in which it serves.

The project will improve traffic operation by providing improved traffic flow through roundabouts. The project will also promote multi-modal transportation by improving bike, transit, and pedestrian access, thereby enhancing the quality of life of the local community. 716
Revised April 2011

9. Summary Statement for PSR or PSR-PDS
For each of the build alternatives, the primary environmental issue centers around the need to acquire additional right of way property.

Studies required:
 Natural Environmental Study (NES)
 Cultural Study
 Hazardous Waste Site Investigation (SI)
 Air Quality Report (AQR)
 Community Impacts Assessment
 Relocation Study
 Geotechnical Investigation
 Visual Analysis (optional)
Permits
 Local Coastal Permit (to be determined)

10. Disclaimer
This Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) provides information to support programming of the proposed project. It is not an environmental determination or document. Preliminary analysis, determinations, and estimates of mitigation costs are based on the project description provided in the Project Study Report (PSR). The estimates and conclusions in the PEAR are approximate and are based on cursory analyses of probable effects. A reevaluation of the PEAR will be needed for changes in project scope or alternatives, or in environmental laws, regulations, or guidelines.

11. List of Preparers
Cultural Resources specialist
Alex Kirkish
Date: 1/9/2015
Biologist
Celina Oliveri
Date: 1/12/2015
Community Impacts specialist
N/A
Date:

Noise and Vibration specialist
Jin Lee
Date: 1/20/2015
Air Quality specialist
Andrew Yoon
Date: 1/9/2015
Paleontology specialist/liaison
N/A
Date:

Water Quality specialist
N/A
Date:

Hydrology and Floodplain specialist
N/A
Date:

Hazardous Waste/Materials specialist Date: 1/13/2015
717
718
Attachment A: PEAR Environmental Studies Checklist
Rev. 11/08
Environmental Studies for PA&ED Checklist
Not
anticipated
Memo
to file
Report
required
Risk*
L M H
Comments
Land Use L
Growth L
Farmlands/Timberlands L
Community Impacts L
Community Character and Cohesion L
Relocations L
Environmental Justice L
Utilities/Emergency Services L
Visual/Aesthetics L
Cultural Resources: L
Archaeological Survey Report L
Historic Resources Evaluation Report L
Historic Property Survey Report L
Historic Resource Compliance Report L
Section 106 / PRC 5024 & 5024.5 L
Native American Coordination L
Finding of Effect L
Data Recovery Plan L
Memorandum of Agreement L
Other: L
Hydrology and Floodplain L
Water Quality and Stormwater Runoff L
Geology, Soils, Seismic and
Topography
L
Paleontology L
PER L
PMP L
Hazardous Waste/Materials: L
ISA (Additional) L
PSI L
Other: L
Air Quality L
Noise and Vibration L
Energy and Climate Change L
Biological Environment L
Natural Environment Study L
Section 7: L
Formal L
Informal L
No effect L
Section 10 L
USFWS Consultation L
NMFS Consultation L
Species of Concern (CNPS, USFS,

BLM, S, F)
L
719
Environmental Studies for PA&ED Checklist
Not
anticipated
Memo
to file
Report
required
Risk*
L M H
Comments
Wetlands & Other Waters/Delineation L
404(b)(1) Alternatives Analysis L
Invasive Species L
Wild & Scenic River Consistency L
Coastal Management Plan L
HMMP L
DFG Consistency Determination L
2081 L
Other: L
Cumulative Impacts L
Context Sensitive Solutions L
Section 4(f) Evaluation L
Permits:
401 Certification Coordination L
404 Permit Coordination, IP, NWP, or
LOP
L
1602 Agreement Coordination L
Local Coastal Development Permit
Coordination
L
State Coastal Development Permit
Coordination
L
NPDES Coordination L
US Coast Guard (Section 10) L
TRPA L
BCDC L
720
Project ID: 07-1500-0162
EA: 07-31500KDescription: Hermosa Beach Roadway Improvement Division
Chief
Office
Chief Senior Generalist Biology Cultural Haz Waste Socio- Economic Storm
Water
To be
Determined
in later
phases
ECL Steward- ship
Noise/AirTo be
Determined
in later
phases
Sup Svcs Design Hydraulics Landscape Planning Right of Way Surveys Total Project Management100.10 – Project Management - PA&ED - 100.15 – Project Management - PS&E - 100.20 – Project Management - Construction - 100.25 – Project Management - Right of Way - Total Project Management - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Perform Preliminary Engineering Studies and Draft Project Report160.05 – Updated Project Information - 160.10 – Engineering Studies - 160.15 – Draft Project Report - 160.30 – Environmental Study Request - 160.40 – NEPA Assignment - Total Perform Prelim Eng Studies & Draft PR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Perform Environmental Studies and Prepare Draft Environmental Document - Task Management Activities165.05 – Env Scoping of Alternatives 70 200 16 16 16 16 8 342 165.10 – General Env Studies 100 300 4 400 804
165.15 – Biological Studies 40 40
165.20 – Cultural Resource Studies 200 200
165.25 – Draft Env Document 2,800 200 8 3,008
165.30 – NEPA Assignment 8 8 Total Perform Env Studies & Prepare DED - - 370 3,308 68 216 416 - 16 - - - 8 - - - - - - 4,402 Obtain Permits, Licenses, Agreements and Certifications (PLACs) and Route Adoptions during PA&ED Component - Task Management Activities170.05 – Reqired PLACs 40 40 170.10 – PLACs 8 8
170.15 – Railroad Agreements - 170.20 – Freeway Agreements - 170.25 – Agreement for Material Sites - 170.30 – Executed Maintenance Agreements - 170.40 – Route Adoptions - 170.45 – MOU from TERO - 170.55 – NEPA Assignment - Obtain PLACS & Rte Adoptions during PA&ED - - - 40 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 Circulate Draft Environmental Document and Select Preferred Project Alternative - Task Management Activities175.05 – DED Circulation 20 100 120 175.10 – Public Hearing 20 160 180 175.15 – Public Comment Responses & Corr 60 200 20 20 300 175.20 – Project Preferred Alternative 8 8
175.25 – NEPA Assignment 8 8 Total Circ DED & Select Preferred Proj Alt - - 100 476 20 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 616 Prepare and Approve Project Report and Final Environmental Document180.05 – Final Project Report 30 30 180.10 – Final Env Document 16 450 16 16 498
180.15 – Completed Env Document 100 100 180.20 – NEPA Assignment 8 8 Total Prep and Approve PR & FED - - 16 588 16 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 636 Prepare Base Maps and Plan Sheets for PS&E Development185.05 – Updated Project Information 320 320 185.15 – Preliminary Design - Total Prep Base Maps & Plan Sheets - - - 320 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 320 WBS Task Activity Code
ATTACHMENT B - Resources by WBS Code
Assigned Unit