Agenda packet — Hermosa Beach City Council, February 28, 2023 (part 4 of 4)

Supplemental testimony from H. Longacre (Resident) to Public Hearing Item XIII-b February 28, 2023 Hermosa Beach City Council 6-PM Regular Meeting City Manager/City Clerk: Please post this additional Supplemental with Parking Charges Public Hearing Item XIII-b of the 6-PM Regular City Council Meeting of June 28, 2023 upon receipt.

Thank You.

February 28, 2023
To: Hermosa Beach City Council ( Raymond Jackson, Michael Detoy, Dean Francois, Rob Saemann, Justin Massey), City Clerk Myra Maravilla, City Manager Suja Lowenthal, and Contract City Attorney Patrick Donegan From: Howard Longacre, Resident
Re: Prior City Council Meeting of Januar 11, 2011. Which btw was essentially far more properly noticed.

City Council and others:

Everything within are of course my views other than the comments presented vis-à-vis the prior referenced meeting.

An eComment posted from resident Kelly Kinnon (see eComment Supplementals) referenced the January 11, 2011 City Council meeting in which this item was previously brought forth, among other times.

For the benefit of all below follows that exact item from that January 11, 2011 meeting.

After over 56 years living as an adult in Manhattan Beach, but mostly Hermosa Beach nothing amazes me anymore with Hermosa’s City Council / City Manager operation, other than that every year in the last 7 years especially, it has become less and less honorable, arrogant, and frankly downright stupid, and for the most part ignores its own people and goes ahead and railroads through whatever the staff presents, as undoubtedly worked up behind the scenes by the City Manager and Councilman Justin Massey (Kingpin, in his mind perhaps, of Hermosa Beach).

5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - TO COMMENCE AT 7:30 P.M.
5a. CONSIDER MAKING CHANGES TO THE PREFERENTIAL PARKING PROGRAM AS FOLLOWS:

1. INCREASE THE RESIDENT PARKING PERMIT FEE FROM $40 TO $100 FOR THE FIRST PERMIT, $100 FOR THE SECOND PERMIT, $200 FOR THE THIRD PERMIT, $300 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL PERMIT.

2. INCREASE THE GUEST PERMIT FEE FROM $40 TO $300 FOR EACH GUEST 892

Page 2 of 2 ends

Supplemental testimony from H. Longacre (Resident) to Public Hearing Item XIII-b February 28, 2023 Hermosa Beach City Council 6-PM Regular Meeting PERMIT.

3. VEHICLES WITH OUT-OF-STATE REGISTRATION WILL NOT BE ISSUED

PARKING PERMITS, UNLESS THE VEHICLE OWNER IS A STUDENT OR IN THE MILITARY, OR HAS DUAL RESIDENCY.

4. INCREASE DRIVEWAY PERMIT FEE FROM $44 TO $54 TO PARK ON THE STREET IN FRONT OF THE OWNER’S DRIVEWAY (ONE-TIME FEE; DOES NOT AFFECT CURRENT PERMIT HOLDERS).

5. INCREASE THE FEE FOR DAILY PASSES FROM $6 TO $10 EACH FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M..

6. EMPLOYEE PERMIT FEES (CURRENTLY $143) MAY ALSO BE DISCUSSED.

RECOMMENDATION: Hold a public hearing and direct staff to prepare a resolution to amend the preferential parking program as directed with regarding to resident and guest vehicle permit pricing, out-of-state vehicles, driveway permits, or other matters as directed.

Following below are the staff report and supplemental hundreds of letters which people necessarily felt they had to take an extensive amount of their time to write regarding their own government’s attempt to de facto additionally tax them for that which they had neither logical right nor need to do.

At the moment btw, Hermosa Beach has almost $60
million in cash sloshing around in the City’s various
bank and investment accounts; smoke and mirrors
accounts as I refer to them as.

893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
From: Myra Maravilla
To: Reanna Guzman
Subject: Fwd: 2/28/23 New Parking Regulations Discussion Date: Monday, February 27, 2023 10:23:49 AM
This is a public comment for the parking item.

Get Outlook for iOS
From: Mayor Ray Jackson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 9:41:13 AM
To: Celeste Coar <[email protected]>
Cc: Myra Maravilla <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 2/28/23 New Parking Regulations Discussion Appreciate the note, Celeste
Thanks for reaching out to share your thoughts on residential parking and I’ll forward as asked.

Have a great Hb day.
v/r
Ray
Raymond Jackson
Mayor
City of Hermosa Beach
540 Pier Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Mobile: 813-362-8056
[email protected]
Improve your community. Report an issue and watch it get fixed by submitting a service request using the online link below or download the free Go Hermosa app. https://www.hermosabeach.gov/ourgovernment/public-works/go-hermosa-app On Feb 26, 2023, at 19:19, Celeste Coar <[email protected]> wrote:

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
Thank you Major for posting information about the Council Meeting regarding parking regulations for Tuesday 2/28.
1222
I would appreciate it if you would forward this letter to the Council for consideration.

Thank You,
Celeste Coar
Council Members,
Can someone please address the needs of some residents who only need a guest pass on occasion
when a visitor or service provider comes to the home? Often times it is impromptu and the date is not known
in advance. Maybe consider selling a limited number of SINGLE USE DAY PASSES per year for residents? They
could have barcodes on them and expire when the annual passes expire. The proposed $150 guest pass (if I understand
it correctly) is exorbitant based on my needs, and I oppose changing the cost.

Also, I would appreciate it if Council Members would remember that we are a diverse community here in Hermosa
with residents who are incredibly wealthy, and others who live on low fixed incomes. If the Council decides to raise rates
for the guest pass can they consider a rebate for qualifying senior residents ? (with guidelines similar to the PropertyTax Rebate
program)
Thank You for your time and consideration,
Celeste Coar
1223

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

MEMORANDUM
DATE: JANUARY 27, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Viki Copeland, Finance Director
CC: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
RE: 9/28/2023 AGENDA. ITEM 13b – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR

PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER CHANGES TO RESIDENTIAL

PARKING PERMITS, EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMITS, AND PARKING METER

AND PARKING LOT RATES
Under the Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Spaces section of the staff report on page 4, staff indicated that the payment of parking meter fees at silver post meters by electric vehicles was already reinstated.

Implementation of this item is in progress and charging will be reinstated after a brief notification and warning period that will begin immediately.

The Meter/Pay-by-Space table on page ten of the staff report shows an Incorrect hourly rate for the County Parking Lots/Meters for Manhattan Beach. The correct hourly rate is $2.50 per hour. The corrected table is attached.

Attachment 8, Parking Meter Rate Comparison with Other Cities had an incorrect hourly rate for the Lower and Upper Pier Lots for the City of Manhattan Beach on page 1. The correct amount is $2.50 per hour for each lot. The redline document is attached.

As supplemental information for City Council, staff prepared the attached map of the impacted parking area and residential units. The total residential unit count in the impacted area is 5,215.
1224
Meter/Pay-by Space
City Location Rate
Hermosa
Beach Upper Pier, Hermosa Avenue - 10am-8pm / 8pm-2am $1.25/$1.50 Lot A, B & D (silver meters) 10am-8pm / 8pm-2am $1.25/$1.50 Lot D- yellow meters only, F, G & All Other Meters, 10am-2am $1.25 24-hour yellow meters and residential one-hour time limit spaces $5/day Manhattan
Beach On-Street Meters City Wide $2.00
County Parking Lots/Meters $2.50
Redondo
Beach
Street Meters: Redondo Bike Path, North Harbor Drive, George Freeth Way, Veterans Park (Lot)
$1/40 min;
$.25/10 min;
$.10/4 min; $.05/2
min
Parking Meter Permit thru 9/21, non-transferrable, numbered parking sticker, CA plates only
$110/Annual per
vehicle. 4 hr. limit
Santa
Monica On-Street Meters City Wide $1.25
Downtown/Beach Meter Zones $2.50
West
Hollywood All Streets
Per 15 Minutes $0.50
Per Hour, 5 min grace between transactions $2.00
Outdoor Dining Parking Meter Fee (Restaurants)
Daytime Hourly Rate per Parking Meter $0.54
Evening Hourly Rate per Parking Meter $0.32
Annual Flat Rate per Non-Enforcement Hour $107.50
Annual Renewal Fees Subject to the LA-Long Beach-Santa Ana Area CPI Increase
Culver City
Areas where employee parking is scarce, and where businesses, by petition, opted for employee parking $0.25 per hour
Areas with high-turnover, food pick-up in the Downtown area $0.75 per 15
minutes
Outside of the Downtown area $1.00 per hour
Downtown area $1.50 per hour
1225
Parking Lot Rate Comparison
Parking Lots/Structures
Hermosa Beach Location Hourly Rate Limit
Lot A, B & D
(silver meters)
10am-8pm/8pm2am
$1.25/$1.50
Lots D- yellow
meters only, F, G &
All Other Meters,
10am-2am
$1.25
Parking Lots - Non-Impact Zone
No limit lot
Valley Park/Gould
Free
Greenwood Park 1 hour free
Lot E, Community
Center, City Hall
2 hours free
South Park, Kiwanis
Club
6 hours free
City Hall, Clark Bldg,
Field & Stadium,
Hermosa Greenbelt,
City Yard Adjacent
12 hours free
City Yard,
Community Center /
South Valley Dr.
72 hours free
Manhattan Beach Location Hourly Rate Limit
Lot 1 $2.00 2 hr.

Lot 2 $2.00 2hr.

Lot 3 $2.00 2 and 10 hr.

Lot 4 $2.00 2 hr.

Lot 6 $2.00 2 hr.

Lot7 Valley Dr $2.00 10 hr.

Lot 8 Ardmore - no
meters
10 hr.
26th/Ocean - County
Lot
$2.50 5 hr.

El Porto - County Lot $2.50 5 hr.

Metlox Structure $2.00 3 hr. on P1, 10 hr. on P2
Civic Center Upper
Lot - no meters
2 hr.

Civic Center Lower
Lot
Civic Center South
Lot
$2.00 2 hr.

Lower Pier Lots $2.50 5hr.

Upper Pier Lots $2.50 5hr.
1226
Parking Lot Rate Comparison
Redondo Beach Location Hourly Rate Limit
Pier and Plaza
Parking Structures
Pay-by-Space
$2.00/hr.

Redondo Beach Bike
Path, North Harbor
Drive, George Freeth
Way, Lot 5 (adjacent
to Veteran’s Park)
$1.00 = 40 min
$0.25 = 10 min
$0.10 = 4 min
$0.05 = 2 min
Santa Monica Parking Lots, Non-Beach
Location Hourly Rate/Daily Max Limit
Downtown Lot $1.25/$17.50
Disabled free
Construction per
space/per day
3x daily max
Main Library Surface
Lot (1 hr. limit)
$1.00
Disabled free
Construction per
space/per day
3x daily max
Main Street Lot $1.25
Disabled free
Mid-City Lot $1.00/$14.00
Disabled free
Construction, per
space/per day
3x daily max
Beach Lots Parking
Rates
(Sunset-Sunrise)
Summer
Apr 1st-Oct 31st
Winter
Nov 1st-Mar 31st
Santa Monica Pier Deck
Weekdays (per hour) $3.75/$18 max/entry $2.50/$12 max/entry Weekends (per
hour)
$3.75/$18 max/entry $3.50/$15 max/entry
Buses or RV's Not allowed Not allowed
Disabled
Placard/Plates
Free Free
Central Beach Zone (Lots 1N, 3N, 2S, 3S)
Short-term (2 hr.
max)
$1.00/hr. $1.00/hr.

Weekdays
(per entry)
$15.00 $7.00
Weekends
(per entry)
$15.00 $10.00
Bus (per entry) 6x daily rate 6x daily rate
Recreational Vehicle
(per entry)
4x daily rate 4x daily rate
1227
Parking Lot Rate Comparison
Central Beach Zone (Lots 1N, 3N, 2S, 3S) (continued)
Location Hourly Rate/Daily Max Limit
Disabled
Placard/Plates
Free Free
North Beach Zone (Lots 4N-9N)
Weekdays (per
entry)
$10.00 $7.00
Weekends (per
entry)
$12.00 $10.00
Bus (per entry) 6x daily rate 6x daily rate
Recreational Vehicle
(per entry)
4x daily rate 4x daily rate
Disabled
Placard/Plates
Free Free
South Beach Zone (Lots 4S-5S)
Weekdays (per
entry)
$10.00 $7.00
Weekends (per
entry)
$12.00 $10.00
Entry After 4 pm Daily Rate Daily Rate
Bus (per entry) 3x daily rate 3x daily rate
Recreational Vehicle
(per entry)
4x daily rate 4x daily rate
Disabled
Placard/Plates
Free Free
Short-term (2 hr.
max)
$1.00/hr. $1.00/hr.

Annenberg Community Center
Daily $3.00/hr $3.00/hr.
$12.00 Max Per Entry $8.00 Max Per Entry
Buses or RV's Not allowed Not allowed
Disabled
Placard/Plates
Free Free
Main Street Farmer's Market (Lot 5S)
Patrons with proof
of purchase
1 Refund Per Person per
Day
Vendors, staff,
performers
Refund or Validations of
Fees
Replacement – All Permits
1st replacement,
stolen permit with
PD report
Free
2nd replacement,
stolen permit with
PD report
50% of cost
1228
Parking Lot Rate Comparison
Replacement – All Permits (continued)
Location Hourly Rate/Daily Max Limit
3rd replacement, or
any lost/stolen
permit without PD
report
Full cost
Parking Structure #9

WEEKDAY WEEKEND
PER ENTRY (Mon-Fri) (Sat & Sun)
First 90 Minutes Free Free

1.5-2.0 hrs $ 2.00 $ 2.00

2.0-2.5 hrs $ 3.00 $ 3.50

2.5-3.0 hrs $ 4.00 $ 5.00

3.0-3.5 hrs $ 5.50 $ 7.00

3.5-4.0 hrs $ 7.00 $ 9.00

4.0-4.5 hrs $ 9.00 $ 11.50

4.5-5.0 hrs $ 11.00 $ 14.00

5.0-5.5 hrs $ 14.00 $ 17.00

5.5 or more $ 17.00 $ 20.00
Daily Maximum $ 17.00 $ 20.00
Lost Ticket (each) $ 17.00 $ 20.00
Parking Structure #10

WEEKDAY WEEKEND
PER ENTRY (Mon-Fri) (Sat & Sun)
First 30 Minutes $ 0.50 $ 0.50

0.50-1.0 hrs $ 1.00 $ 1.00

1.0-1.5 hrs $ 1.50 $ 1.50

1.5-2.0 hrs $ 2.00 $ 2.00

2.0-2.5 hrs $ 3.00 $ 3.50

2.5-3.0 hrs $ 4.00 $ 5.00

3.0-3.5 hrs $ 5.50 $ 7.00

3.5-4.0 hrs $ 7.00 $ 9.00

4.5-5.0 hrs $ 9.00 $ 11.50

5.0-5.5 hrs $ 11.00 $ 14.00

5.5 hours or more $ 14.00 $ 17.00
Daily Maximum $ 17.00 $ 20.00
Lost Ticket (each) $ 17.00 $ 20.00
Parking Structure Main Library Garage and Civic Center Lot & Structure

WEEKDAY WEEKEND
PER ENTRY (Mon-Fri) (Sat & Sun)
First 30 minutes Free Free
Up to 1.0 hours $ 0.50 $ 1.00
Up to 1.5 hours $ 1.00 $ 2.00
Up to 2.0 hours $ 2.00 $ 3.00
Up to 2.5 hours $ 3.00 $ 4.00
1229
Parking Lot Rate Comparison
Parking Structure Main Library Garage and Civic Center Lot & Structure (continued)

WEEKDAY WEEKEND
PER ENTRY (Mon-Fri) (Sat & Sun)
Up to 3.0 hours $ 4.00 $ 5.00
Up to 3.5 hours $ 5.50 $ 5.00
Up to 4.0 hours $ 7.00 $ 5.00
Up to 4.5 hours $ 8.50 $ 5.00
Up to 5.0 hours $ 10.00 $ 5.00
Up to 5.5 hours $ 12.00 $ 5.00

5.5 hours or more $ 14.00 $ 5.00
Daily Maximum $ 14.00 $ 5.00
Lost Ticket (each) $ 14.00 $ 5.00
For construction or other exclusive use (per
space per day)
3x daily rate
Promenade and Surrounding Shopping Areas (Parking Structures 1-8)

WEEKDAY WEEKEND
PER ENTRY (Mon-Fri) (Sat & Sun)
First 90 minutes FREE FREE
Up to 2.0 hours $ 2.00 $ 2.00
Up to 2.5 hours $ 3.50 $ 4.00
Up to 3.0 hours $ 5.00 $ 6.00
Up to 3.5 hours $ 7.00 $ 8.50
Up to 4.0 hours $ 9.00 $ 11.00
Up to 4.5 hours $ 11.50 $ 14.00
Up to 5.0 hours $ 14.00 $ 17.00
Up to 5.5 hours $ 17.00 $ 21.00

5.5 hours or more $ 20.00 $ 25.00
Daily Maximum $ 20.00 $ 25.00
Lost Ticket (each) $ 20.00 $ 25.00
Free parking Sundays 6 AM to 11 AM only
Entry between 6 AM and 11 AM and exit after 11 AM, rates apply between 11 AM and time of exit
Entry before 6AM and exit after 11 AM, rates apply outside of free period Entry before 6 AM, rates apply between time of entry and 6 AM For construction or other exclusive use (per
space per day)
3x daily rate
Parking Cards - Downtown Structures (nonrefundable)$10.00 West Hollywood
Location Hourly Rate Limit
Bonner Lot $2.00 ea. 1 hr. 2 hr. max stay
City Hall Automated
Garage
$1.00 ea. 20 min $8.00 Daily Max
Hart Park Free 2 hr. max
1230
Parking Lot Rate Comparison
West Hollywood (continued)
Location Hourly Rate Limit
Kings Road Parking
Garage
1st hr. free, $1.00 ea. 20
min
$8.00 max; $5.00 max after
6pm
La Jolla Lot $2.00/hr. $100 Monthly
Melrose Lot $2.00/hr. 2 hr., no monthly
Orange Grove Lot $1.00/hr./$60.00 Mo.

Plummer Park North Free 3 hr., no monthly
Plummer Park South Free 3 hr., no monthly
Queens Lot $2.00/hr., $2.00/hr.
after 6pm $150 Mo.

Robertson Lot $1.00/hr. first 3 hours
$2.00/hr. Thereafter
No Monthly
Spaulding Lot $1.00/hr./ $60.00mo.

Sunset Lot $2.00/hr.

Sun-Thu:
$5.00 flat rate after 6pm
Fri & Sat:
$8.00 flat rate after 6pm
$10.00 max until 6pm
$150.00 Monthly
West Hollywood
Park 5-Story
$1.00 ea. 20 min $12.00 max
Sun-Wed: 5am-2am
Thurs: 5am-2am
Fri-Sat: 5am-2am
$1.00 ea. 20 min
Until 6pm, 1 hr. free
2 hr. validation for park
and pool guests
$6.00 daily max after 6pm
$8.00 daily max after 6pm
$9.00 daily max after 6pm
Lost ticket $12
West Hollywood
Library
$1.00 ea. 20 min $12.00 max
Mon-Wed: 10:45am7pm
Fri & Sat: 9am-6pm
Sun: 9am-2pm
$1.00 ea. 20 min,
First 3 hrs. free with
Library validation
$12.00 daily max
Culver City Location Hourly Rate Limit
Downtown Parking
Structures
(3 facilities)
1 hr. Free; ea.

Additional 30 min $1.00
$12.00/Daily; $120.00/mo.

Downtown
Structures -
Temporary Film and
Event Parking
$9.00/per space/
per day
Additional fee of $30.00 per hour is required if the parking structure must be open before 8:00 am and after 1:00 am.
$0.35 per validation ticket is charged for all reservations Five working day notice required prior to any cancellation for refund 1231
Parking Lot Rate Comparison
Structure & Lot Parking Permits – Summary of Survey
City Area Hourly Rate Options
Hermosa Beach Downtown Parking
Structure & Lots
$31.00/$62.00 Monthly
Manhattan Beach All Lots & Structure None None
Redondo Beach Pier & Plaza Parking
Structures
None None
Lot 4, 309 Esplanade $25.00 per vehicle Seniors only - monthly Santa Monica Parking Lots –
Non-Beach
$14.00-$17.50 max
$55.00 to $132.00
Daily
Monthly
Beach Lots
Various
Summer/Winter rates
$7.00 - $18.00 daily
max
per entry
Daily, Weekdays,
Weekends
Beach $20.00, $105.00
$155.00
Monthly, Semi-Annual,
Annual
Senior Beach $25.00 Annual
Overnight Beach $15.00, $75.00
$150.00
Monthly, Semi-Annual,
Annual
Parking Structures
Special Events
$30.00-$35.00/entry Weekdays/Weekends
Parking Structures
Various Locations
$14.00 - $20.00 Max Daily
Parking Structures
Various Locations
(Downtown
residents/Certain ADA
& Affordable Housing
Residents only)
$65.00 - $220.00 Monthly
West Hollywood Various lots $60.00 - $150.00 Monthly
Culver City Downtown $12.00/$120.00 Daily/Monthly
1232
Ardmore Ave
Pacific
Coast
Hwy
Morningside
Dr
Prospect Ave
Monterey Blvd
Pier Ave
8th St
Aviation Blvd
2nd St
Hermosa Ave
Lo
m
a
Dr
Manhattan Ave
2nd St
Ma
nh
atta
n
Ave
Gould Ave
Longfellow Ave
Valley Dr
Impacted Parking Area and Residential Units
Impacted Parking Boundary
Residential Unit Count
0 1 - 3
4 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
30 - 286
Residential Unit Count Derived from Los Angeles
County Assessors Parcel Data Feb 2023
Total Residential Unit Count
in Impacted Parking Area: 5,215
1233
City Council Regular Meeting (Closed Session - 5:00 PM and Open Session - 6:00 PM 02-28-23 17:00
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
b) REPORT 23-0111 PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER

CHANGES TO

RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS, EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMITS,

AND PARKING METER AND PARKING LOT RATES
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
49 1 40 2
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.

Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for b) REPORT 23-0111 PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER CHANGES TO

RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS, EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMITS,

AND PARKING METER AND PARKING LOT RATES
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Overall Sentiment
Jessica Accamando
Location:

Submitted At: 2:57pm 02-28-23
RE: Employee Parking Permits
Dear Mayor, Council and City staff,
On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, we would like to let you know about our concerns regarding the staff report recently presented regarding the Employee Parking Permit Program. We disagree with the report's recommendations and believe they will negatively affect businesses in our community. 1234
Firstly, we oppose the recommendation to update the locations for the employee parking permit program to include only off-street parking lots and the downtown parking structure. This will limit the available parking options for employees, particularly those who work in businesses not located near these designated areas. In addition, our businesses located on the North side of Pier Avenue along the 400 block are already excluded from the "Impact Parking Area" and would be further disadvantaged.

Secondly, we are strongly opposed to the recommendation to increase the pricing for employee permits to discourage driving or to encourage employers to provide parking options for their employees. This will place an undue burden on hourly waged employees who may not have other options for transportation due to the lack of reliable mass transportation and the high cost of living in the area.

We understand the need to reduce the number of cars on the road and encourage alternative forms of transportation. However, raising parking prices for those driving to work is not an effective or equitable solution.

Instead, we urge the City to focus on implementing policies and initiatives to encourage public transportation and other sustainable transportation options.

It is also worth noting that the City's Parking Management Study and Recommended Standards for the Coastal Zone from 2019 has a priority list of recommendations to focus on, with Employee Parking Permit Program improvement being the 11th of 12 items mentioned. The City should focus on higher-priority items on this list instead of placing undue focus on the Employee Parking Permit Program.

We request that the City Council reconsider the recommendations presented in the staff report and instead focus on implementing policies that are equitable and effective in reducing the number of cars on the road.

Sincerely,
The Economic Development Action Committee
Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau
Anthony Higgins
Location:

Submitted At: 2:48pm 02-28-23
Look. Last summer in north Hermosa residential areas there was virtually mo enforcement of the one hour parking restriction.

This can be easily verified.

The first order of business should be refunds for residents The second order of businessshould be telling residents how you are going to enforce the one hour limit in residential areas if you haven’t solved the parking enforcement staffing issues.

The third order of business should be to explain how you are going to enforce the one hour limit in residential areas if you have suspended “tire chalking”.

Hermosa Native
Location:

Submitted At: 2:22pm 02-28-23
1/2

1. Meters - Meter increases look reasonable, provided the business community doesn’t think it will hurt them. With an average stay of, say, 3 hours, I don’t think visitors will care if the rate is $1.50, $2.00 or $2.50/hr. It’s another couple of bucks, and most are occasional visitors.

2. Employee Parking – I don’t have a dog in the hunt, but would give deference to business owners. Hermosa doesn’t have a lot of businesses to begin with, many of the employees are probably not making a high wage, and I don’t think that many of the businesses themselves are making huge profits (though I don’t really know, but I am particularly talking about the smaller retail businesses). 1235

3. EV Subsidies – Glad these are ending. I supported with the advent of EV’s, but to think I (and all other Hermosa residents) was paying for someone to “fill the tank” on their $100K Tesla is pretty infuriating. Same with free parking for EV’s. That time has passed. That change, already passed I believe, should be implemented immediately. Turn off the free taps. Charge for parking. I am already envious they don’t have to pay $5/gallon.

4. Residential Parking – I have seen clips showing certain council members think they should charge what the market will bear. First, there is no data supporting the new proposal is market, as described in other comments.

Second, If your goal is to serve your constituents, this is a terrible way to look at it. The 2010 Staff Report (p.2) states that “the purpose of the program [is] to provide long-term residential parking for people impacted by beach parking while maintaining availability of public parking near the beach”. The purpose is not (repeat, not) to maximize revenue or make one group of residents pay a disproportionate share based simply on what street their home is on. I agree with many points made in letters below, but will add---- • Although I can see a good argument for no raise so long as each resident is covering the administrative cost of the program, a modest raise is within the realm of reason, but Hermosa already charges more than other communities, even before a substantial increase (if the City did a survey, like they did for meters and employee permits, in the interest of transparency it should be shared). • Why should those who happen to live near the beach be singled out to pay to park in front of their own homes? How is that fair? Let’s make it citywide! Everyone pays to park on the streets that their taxes already help pay for!! • If me or my wife want to park in front of the house to unload groceries rather than in the detached garage around the alley and a flight of stairs down ,we should be able to, just like others in the City – and not then have to move the car within the hour.
• To make a point using the absurd, if you really want to reduce street parking and increase revenue, why not take it to the extreme—charge $1,000 per permit. I have no doubt that there are at least 500 people in the impact zone for whom money is no object who would pay that amount, and it would decrease your permits from about 9,000 (which is down from 2010, curiously) to, say, 500, while still raising your revenues!! And think of the ticket revenue!! Or you can auction them off to the highest bidders. • Regarding the limitation, I see it only would reduce the total by 6%. You already have a requirement that they only be issued to cars registered at the address. If there is a fraud problem involving resale, that can be addressed – there is technology other cities use (plate scanners), or you can spot check the sticker numbers against the plate numbers and issue a big fine for cheaters. That said – 24 passes at one address?? Not sure about that (I am guessing it is a multi-unit property, but perhaps not). I suggest 5 total with a right to appeal under special circumstances.
• Even if you think it should be a “market price”, there is no data supporting that this proposal is market. In fact, the opposite.

Hermosa NativePartOne
Location:

Submitted At: 2:16pm 02-28-23
2/2
At the very least, you should do a proper survey about how your constituents—and in particular the ones who are impacted by this proposed increase (depending on how many and what type of permits) really feel about this. I suspect that some will show up for the meeting, but we all know that most people are busy, uninformed, shy, housebound, and/or sometimes hesitant to make the effort to appear at hearings. That certainly doesn’t mean that they don’t care or should be ignored. At least give them a proper, mailed notice a couple weeks before the meeting so they can be aware. However, judging by the feedback that is represented in the comments below, I think you have a pretty good sample and can assume that the affected residents are overwhelmingly against anything other than a modest increase in permit fees. I respectfully take issue with one point made below in the sole post supporting the new policy – the roads are not “City Property” in my book – they are ”Public Property”, which we, the public, are paying for. Some of us shouldn’t have to pay twice based solely on location. Using that logic the writer might think that we should be charged to drive on “City Property” (which, as taxpayers, we do – but those who live in one section of the city don’t pay more than others).

In summary, a modest increase may be warranted, though the Council needs to acknowledge that Hermosa already charges more than any other City, and a strong argument could be made that residents should only have to bear the actual cost of the program rather than an arbitrary number. And if you sincerely want to know what 1236
people think, good or bad, you should send a notice.

Rick Koenig
Location:

Submitted At: 2:10pm 02-28-23
My name is Rick Koenig, I live at 1825 Manhattan Avenue. Most of you have been to my house, for those of you who haven’t and for the record, My home is in the impacted zone a couple of blocks from the Pier Ave. downtown district.

I would like to take you on a journey of facts in the hope of instituting logic and common sense on an issue that effects hundreds if not thousands of our residents.

Let’s see how this sounds
Let’s set the scene, shall we?
A small beach community that is the destination location for 100’s of thousands of visitors every year with a already severe lack of parking issue. Then let’s increase the occupancy of the most popular downtown restaurants which also takes away parking making it harder to find a place to park.

Are you with me so far?
OK to the point.

So, the best thinking after taking all the before-mentioned facts into consideration is to raise the cost of residential parking passes making it more expensive to park in font of your own house. Sadly, when my house was built in 1917 garages were not built large enough to accommodate cars built 100 years later. That being said, I can only park on the street and for the 123 days between May 15th and September 15th I must have a residential parking permit displayed on my windshield or face a daily $45.00 fine.

Here is a little-known fact. The whole residential parking pass program was originally FREE to property owners in the “impacted area”. It occurs to me that City government back then thought of resident first and lived and ruled by not concerning themselves with making money off those they were elected to serve.

Perhaps leaving it alone for now is the best way to handle this issue. Many of us are still rebounding from the pandemic and do not need added expenses and more municipal rules.

Here are the other cities fees, Why are you proposing us to be considerably more? Leave it alone.

Raymond Dussault
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 12:43pm 02-28-23
Specifically, in regards the egregious propoesed cost increase for lower wage hospitality and retail workers (the people that use the employee parking permits more than anyone), are city staff, who make multiple times more than those hospitality/retail workers, subject to the employee parking cost or is their parking subsidized by the City budget?
Randy Balik
Location:

Submitted At: 11:38am 02-28-23
1237
Absolutely NOT. There are a lot of reasons, and I will try to not be repetitive with many. But I want to emphasize two, one of which is likely repetitive.

First, with these proposed fee hikes, our parking permit cost structure is becoming a TAX for those of us who live in the parking permit zone. There is a strong argument to be made here now that this is a tax disguised as something else, and the process for raising taxes has very specific rules. I imagine I speak for many when I say that we've accepted the permit parking fees (myself for 26 years now) as a minor annual cost to try and keep parking more available in our residential neighborhood by making it a bit harder for non-residents to park especially at peak times. But the fact is we are forced to pay this in order for us and our guests to park in our own neighborhood, and when you are forced to pay something, it's a tax. So this is akin to a steep tax increase without going through the approval and ratification process for such an increase.

Secondly, and this is my own personal situation to use anecdotally, we only buy TWO permits in my household. I put a sticker on my car and we get the guest pass for my wife's car. We typically park in our driveway but need passes when we have visitors. She gets the guest pass because we don't have a need for another sticker and she'd rather not put a sticker in her company-provided vehicle, and it then gives us the flexibility to use the pass either for her car when needed or for a guest. This would normally cost us $40 x 2 per year ($80). But to do this now, rather than get a second pass, we'd be paying for the first pass (sticker) at $50 and another $150 for the guest pass....which would be $200 under this proposed rate hike and is FAR MORE than just two sticker passes would be at $120...but we need a hanging guest pass so we're forced into this (again, "tax" comes to mind). So this tiered fee structure doesn't make any sense to me, let alone the exorbitant fee hikes. Some people just guy the one guest pass so they don't have to have a sticker, but now you'd be forcing them to get a sticker, or perhaps even two passes, which makes the problem of more passes worse, not better. So there's just a problem with this fee structure in general for at least some of us.

Sure, there is likely a problem with people trying to cheat the system with more passes than their addresses should have, but this is NOT the solution to that problem. Try to solve that problem on its own, which will take some work on the part of city staff, but that's their job...do do the work of the city. Have the city staff flag addresses where there is a red flag and investigate if the situation is valid or not. In some cases, they'll find a valid reason. In others, they'll find people cheating the system and can respond. Here's another anecdotal example - I moved to Hermosa in 1996 and lived in a 6-bedroom house with 5 roommates, and we were all entitled to a pass then as well as one guest pass, and that was VALID. But now that would have been subject to a limit of 4 total passes and we would have a had a major parking issue just to live in that house. There are other residences like this today, I would imagine. Again...anecdotal, but a program like this would have been problematic then and likely is now for at least some of our residents.

So it seems to me for the city to solve the "too many passes" problem, it'll take a bit of work by city staff to just identify and deal with the real problem addresses. And if it's not that problem that's being targeted for solution, then what is? None of these fee increases make sense anyway.

Charles Gronbach
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 11:09am 02-28-23

I WOULD LIKE TO GO ON RECORD OPPOSING THIS PROPOSED LARGE INCREASE IN THE PRICE OF STREET PARKING PASSES. IT LOOKS LIKE OUR NON-ELECTED STAFF EMPLOYEES ONCE AGAIN ARE WORKING OVERTIME TRYING TO FIND WAYS TO INCREASE CITY REVENUES. IF HERMOSA BEACH

CITY GOV'T TRUELY NEEDS MORE REVENUE MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO REDUCE THE STAFF HEADCOUNT.

Kelly Kinnon
Location:

Submitted At: 10:01am 02-28-23
First, thanks to the staff for assistance in my recent queries. They promptly addressed my questions.

I will just make a few points since I think from the comments below there is clear consensus opposing the proposed residential permit changes.
1238
The last time this was considered, on January 11, 2011, all affected residents were mailed notice. And boy did they respond. There was an OVERFLOW crowd at the meeting, spilling into the lobby (don't take my word for it, it is referenced in the video linked below). There were 213 pages of comments (I have sent to you all through the City email, and would urge you to flip through them). In an unprecedented move, council "read the room", called the item out of order, and somewhat sheepishly tabled the item indefinitely. Coincidentally, Mr. Tucker, who commented below, was presiding (and he did not support it then either). I think the video is "must see TV" for any council member who is considering this issue. Start at 8:20. It shows the passion of the residents, which I am sure would be replicated if everyone got noticed, as they were in 2011. https://hermosabeach.granicus.com/player/clip/1275?view_id=6&redirect=true&h=6b9dead36732b1e316ebcd164 3b7531c
I will concur with Jack Levy's comments below. This should not be a profit center - it is a service to residents in impacted areas so they can park near their own house. That is how many other cities seem to view it. Hermosa is already the most expensive, before these changes. Can many afford to pay more -yes. Can some not afford to pay more - yes. But the real issue the fairness of making those in impacted zones pay to park in the street, while the majority of residents can park in front of their homes at no extra charge (other than the taxes we ALL pay to maintain those streets). If you want to raise money, how about we charge everyone in the City $25 to park on their street, regardless of address.

If you extrapolate the percentage of those opposing below to the affected parties who are unaware this is being considered, it seems like there are a whole lot of folks who will be unhappy should you institute changes.

Lastly, I respectfully disagree in part with Mr. Tucker's comment regarding paying for CEO's (unless you net out the revenue generated by said enforcement). The fees should just cover the marginal cost of administering the program (cost of printing permits, sending out, etc.).

Thank you for your consideration.

Peter Tucker
Location:

Submitted At: 6:18am 02-28-23
The residential parking plan allow residents living in the parking district the ability to park (West of Morningside Drive and Loma Drive) the ability to near their homes. This permit allows residents in the district to hunt for possible parking but is not a guarantee that there will be parking. This parking plan has Coastal Commission approval. Over the years enforcement has been very spotty and thus the posted signage is not enforced.

This is not to be used as a revenue generator but only to pay for the CSO (code enforcement officers) costs. It seems that since the Sales Tax measure failed the city is trying to Punish the residents for its failure. The then Mayor stated that Public Safety officers would cut back. He should know that the one of the requirements of an elected official is to provide Public Safety personal. The Councill should look at the countless consultants being hired to reduce spending.

Howard LadditionalSidebar
Location:

Submitted At: 3:00am 02-28-23
Council,
In the following eComment posted earlier, I forgot to mention that after my complaints, never replied to by Staff or the City Council members this past weekend, the Public Hearing Notices for tonight's meeting were posted at 3:30PM yesterday just 27.5 hours before a regular meeting. They should have been posted 10 full days ago.

That while fine, is not good enough for a Public Hearing notice of such signifance, i.e. 27.5 hours of posting notice for what was supposed to be a minimum of 240 hours of posting notice. Thanks to whomever posted the notice but too bad no one in staff or the Council, especially the ceremonial Mayor who was written to first, could bother to lower themselves to replying to this old man.

Note also that the other Public Hearing was thusly also not noticed fully and timely. This is the digital age and you should either do things fully and correctly or give it up that you are ok for sloppy incomplete government.

Sloppy government leads to corrujption of course.

Howard L.
1239
Howard L
Location:

Submitted At: 2:12am 02-28-23
Council,
VERY IMPORTANT LEGAL ISSUES ARE BEING RAISED WITHIN.

CITY ATTORNEY AND COUNCIL PLEASE CONSIDER CAREFULLY this eComment as many of your constituents are also attorneys as well as being Hermosa Beach residents.

It is my firm belief that this item is too complex, contains too much for a single Public Hearing, and was incredibly poorly and incompletely, nor reasonably noticed from what Hermosa residents are used to expecting from its government for an item significantly representing taxation and fees to be paid by the residents and others in city.

Possibly it seems obvious that someone in city, or on the Hermosa City Council said, “let’s have some fun by having Hermosa’s new City Council step on Hermosa’s 3rd rail”, i.e. ‘Parking Permit Costs and Regulations’.

Welcome to a reality check. One I have seen in a few times in the past. However you on Council have not even begun to get a true reality check regarding this issue as it was not hardly even noticed.

ISSUES WITH THIS PUBLIC HEARING’s NOTICING:
1- This public hearing has not been noticed but in the most incomplete and minimum of ways. 2- The Public Notice included 4 major topics (Far too many for one Public Hearing) was placed by the City Clerk’s office only in the back of the Easy Reader classifieds 2.5 weeks ago. The particular newspaper issue was not one that is delivered to every Hermosa Beach residence. Few likely saw it there. 3-The Public Hearing Notice was somehow not even posted on the City’s own website where it says, “this is where legal notices” are posted. That was evidently a major SNAFU. Likely unintentional however, nonetheless not accomplished.
5- There were none of the city’s large orange-Fluorescent placards or other notices posted around the city where Parking Permits are required, for permit-holders to learn of this Public Hearing as done for other matters of an area interest.
4- But worse yet, there was not even a simple card mailed to every parking permit holder as accomplished in the past for this very issue. The city has the list of parking permit holder addresses.

So only but perhaps a couple of hundred parking permit holders, of the thousands in city learned about this from a handful of noisy blog posters and others in town during the past three days.

ACTIONS NEEDED TO CORRECT THE NOTICING SNAFU:
1) Rather than waste possibly hours of staff and Council time taking testimony by Zoom/phone or in chambers given the sorry noticing situation it would be best to simply pull the item from the Feb 28, 2023 meeting agenda, due to the incredibly poor noticing.
2) Direct staff later in the meeting, on ‘future agenda items/other matters’, to rethink the entire item, and be sure to Notice this item next time with a card mailed to all permit holders indicating what is proposed. 3) Ensure that when reconsidering, that staff include logical thinking, primarily focusing on the issue of excessive parking permits or those abusing the obtaining of permits, using a better, and more computer-based verification of those receiving the permits, requiring in-person renewal or other at least every 6-years (not this renewal by mail scam), permits being issued basis a two-year renewal and more. 4) Ensure lowering of the rates from those presently set, which are already over the cost they should be, given 1240
the revenue the city makes from the parking meters, and ticketing utilizing the residents’ streets. Net zero revenue should come from the residents needing these parking permits. 5) Also determine a process for anyone residing in city outside the permit area (long a requested item) to have the right to buy a parking permit to avoid the 1 hr-limit currently in the regulated residential streets. Such permits should not have to be renewed every year. Every resident of Hermosa Beach should have the right to park in any non-silver-metered parking space in city presently allowed only for those now able to purchase a parking permit in those areas.

This Public Hearing was not noticed properly, that’s unquestionably a fact.

The failure to properly and fully notice this particular Public Hearing, especially, and not do a mailer to each permit holder, and not even put up orange fluorescent notices in the area of the city presently able to purchase these parking permits, is truly thoughtless, unconscionable, and incredibly selfish.

You on the City Council are our representatives. Take quick action via the Mayor/City Attorney to correct these mistakes, by removing the item from the agenda and posting in RED at the top of the agenda that Public Hearing Item XIII-b has been removed for reasons of noticing, but will be addressed by the City Council on other matters only for giving of direction to staff for a future item, whatever that be.

Howard L.

Jack Levy
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 12:15am 02-28-23
As so many have said the parking permit system is not supposed to be a profit center and especially not a penalty system for people who have to have roommates. While, I don’t have any roommates now I know in the past when I did that would’ve been a dealbreaker to have to spend so much money for parking permits every year when you’re not guaranteed a space. If you want to start a teared system for four or more passes to penalize anyone attempting to abuse the system maybe then but otherwise increase of $5 dollars or $10 is absolutely the most that is reasonable and across the first four passes and the hanging permit that I use for when family or friends come down to spend money on a visit to Hermosa.

I absolutely oppose this proposed price increase and change. For reference has also been shared by others have a look at what the other cities charge. Well, being a leader is a nice idea being a price leader, that penalizes people who struggle they have to make the choice to live with several others is wrong.

Manhattan Beach, is a good example, as is Redondo, take a look at how much they charge. Make note and copy them at least on this one. Even better look at the other HB, Huntington Beach, their passes are a 3 or 5 year pass for less than Hermosa charged last year.
……………………………………………Number of Permits
………………………………..…One…….Two……..Three….. Four
Hermosa Beach - Proposed ..$50.00 ..$125.00 ….$225.00. .$375.00 Hermosa Beach - Current …..$40.00 ..$80.00 …...$120.00 ..$160.00 El Segundo ……………………$0.00 …$0.00 ….....$0.00 …..$0.00
Rancho Palos Verdes ………..$2.50 …$5.00 ……..$7.50 …….N/A
Redondo Beach ………………$15.00 ..$30.00 ……$45.00…$60.00
Manhattan Beach …………….$7.50…..$10.00….. .$12.50 ..…N/A
Santa Monica …………………$21.00 ..$47.00 …...$90.00 ….$122.00 Malibu ………………………….$30.00 .$60.00 …...$90.00 …..$120.00
Los Angeles …………………..$34.00 ..$68.00 …...$102.00 ……N/A
Average - Other Cities ……….$15.71 ..$31.43 …...$49.57…. $75.50 Lesley Wright
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 10:39pm 02-27-23
1241
I’m shocked to learn of Hermosa Beach City Council’s proposal to raise the cost of resident parking permits by as much as 375%. This is a breach of duty & a failure in representation by Council members were elected to represent the interests of Hermosa Beach residents. Hermosa property owners pay large sums in property taxes.

Why are we being charged anything to park on the streets our taxes pay to maintain? The proposed astronomical increase in annual parking permit fees is unjustifiable & should be rescinded. anonymous seniors
Location:

Submitted At: 10:35pm 02-27-23
We are seniors who live just above PCH and would like to park in our town near the beach as beach area residents are able to. There might be considered a low-cost low-income seniors' permit that would be good for life for low-income seniors’ to allow them to occasionally park near downtown and enjoy the beach area without having to pay residential parking meters or be limited to just 1 hour on those streets. We are locked out of our own city as if we are from outside the city. We are no different than any other resident or worker but we should be entitled to a parking permit with a onetime fee. We’ve been here virtually forever and few think of our needs. We used to walk to the beach, but that is more difficult now. Why are we unable to have a parking permit that we would rarely use? It’s not as if we are going to be parking overnight by the beach. Would you consider this.

Thank you very much.

Daniel Godwin
Location:

Submitted At: 10:23pm 02-27-23
It’s understandable that the City wants to address parking availability by reducing the # of parking permits.

However, affordability (especially for renters) should be at the forefront of City Council’s attention. The majority of residents in this town rent including many households that include 3-4 roommates.

Under the proposed change, please consider raising the number of permits to 5 per household and at a cost that is fair/equitable to residents with lower incomes. A household of 4 roommates equates to an average of $93.75/person. An increase of this magnitude from $40 is unfair and excessive. Please consider a permit increase that accounts for inflation and processing, but also fair to our renter community.

Hermosa Res
Location:

Submitted At: 9:46pm 02-27-23
Note to City: The Legislative Text refers to a 2019 study that says that residential parking is "well under market". It gives no data for that. Here is the report (I had to dig):
http://hermosabeach.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?M=F&ID=cc76e455-71d4-4e7b-a735-ebcf6f01e535.pdf See page 69 and 70. It says "Peer cities, such as Newport Beach and Corona Del Mar, price residential parking permits at an
escalating rate". First, Corona Del Mar is not a city. It is a neighborhood in Newport Beach. Second, Newport Beach charges currently charges $19 per pass for residential parking. It is not an escalating rate. Here is the link. https://www.newportbeachca.gov/government/departments/finance/revenue-division/parking-information/parkingpermits/residential-zone-3-eastbluff-cdmhs So the entire premise of "over market" is completely unsupported. This is also shown by other posts below comparing costs that other city's charge for residential parking. Not to mention, what is "market" to park in front of your own residence? Generally speaking, it is $0, just like it is for the majority of Hermosa residents.

Holly Heines
Location:

Submitted At: 9:13pm 02-27-23
Residential Parking Permit increase. NO
A L
Location: 90254
Submitted At: 8:36pm 02-27-23
1242
I like to think of myself as a relatively reasonable person when it comes to taking side on local matters, but wow.

This one really threw me. I shouldn't be shocked anymore, but here I am again. I would like to make it clear that I vehemently oppose the outrageous increase in fees proposed for residential parking passes, both sticker and hanger (guest) passes.

I believe the current cap on hanger passes (i.e. 1 per address) is fair and I believe it would be fair to cap on the number of sticker passes per address as proposed at 4. HOWEVER, the proposed increase in fees is completely unreasonable and most notably, the fact that the already-limited-to-1-per-address hanger (guest) pass is immediately increased from $40 to $150 *regardless* of how many passes allocated to a single address is complete and utter robbery.

Jim Krueger
Location: 90254, HERMOSA beach
Submitted At: 6:36pm 02-27-23
This new pricing is ripoff of the residents of Hermosa. I can’t believe this is even a recommendation. Maybe a price hike of $5 to $45.. per pass.

Take Two
Location:

Submitted At: 6:27pm 02-27-23
My attempt below changed format when I entered, so I am giving it one more shot! If it fails again, I think it is still decipherable with minimal effort.
……………………………………………Number of Permits
………………………………..…One…….Two……..Three….. Four
Hermosa Beach - Proposed ..$50.00 ..$125.00 ….$225.00. .$375.00 Hermosa Beach - Current …..$40.00 ..$80.00 …...$120.00 ..$160.00 El Segundo ……………………$0.00 …$0.00 ….....$0.00 …..$0.00
Rancho Palos Verdes ………..$2.50 …$5.00 ……..$7.50 …….N/A
Redondo Beach ………………$15.00 ..$30.00 ……$45.00…$60.00
Manhattan Beach …………….$7.50…..$10.00….. .$12.50 ..…N/A
Santa Monica …………………$21.00 ..$47.00 …...$90.00 ….$122.00 Malibu ………………………….$30.00 .$60.00 …...$90.00 …..$120.00
Los Angeles …………………..$34.00 ..$68.00 …...$102.00 ……N/A
Average - Other Cities ……….$15.71 ..$31.43 …...$49.57…. $75.50 Sarah Nahrwold
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 6:21pm 02-27-23
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed increase in parking permit fees and the imposition of a limit on the number of permits per household. While I understand that the city may be looking for ways to generate revenue, I believe that this proposal is misguided and would have a disproportionate impact on low- to moderate-income residents.

Firstly, the current parking permit system was designed to help residents cope with the challenges of living in a dense urban environment. It was never intended to be a revenue generator for the city. The proposed increase in fees and limit on the number of permits per household would fundamentally change the nature of the system, turning it into a regressive tax on residents who can least afford it.

Secondly, the tiered pricing structure would penalize residents with roommates, who may need to purchase multiple permits to accommodate everyone's vehicles. In many cases, these are individuals and families who are already struggling to make ends meet, and an additional financial burden would only make things more difficult for them.
1243
Instead of increasing the cost of parking permits, I urge the city to consider alternative revenue-generating measures that do not disproportionately impact low- to moderate-income residents. For example, the city could explore options for generating revenue from parking meters or enforcing existing parking regulations more effectively.

In conclusion, I strongly urge the city to reconsider the proposed increase in parking permit fees and limit the number of permits per household. This proposal would create a burden for many of the city's residents and undermine the original purpose of the parking permit system. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Sarah Nahrwold
Justthe Facts
Location:

Submitted At: 6:01pm 02-27-23
From the Easy Reader. Bottom line - even without any changes Hermosa seems to be the most expensive and much higher than average (hopefully this is still readable and the format doesn't change):

Number of Permits
One Two Three Four
Hermosa Beach - Proposed $50.00 $125.00 $225.00 $375.00 Hermosa Beach - Current $40.00 $80.00 $120.00 $160.00
El Segundo $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Rancho Palos Verdes $2.50 $5.00 $7.50 N/A
Redondo Beach $15.00 $30.00 $45.00 $60.00
Manhattan Beach $7.50 $10.00 $12.50 N/A
Santa Monica (2) $21.00 $47.00 $90.00 $122.00
Malibu $30.00 $60.00 $90.00 $120.00
Los Angeles $34.00 $68.00 $102.00 N/A
Average - Other Cities $15.71 $31.43 $49.57 $75.50
Lsrry Fisher
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 5:00pm 02-27-23
We’re in full support of the opposition comments made thus far. No need to repeat them. We have lived here since 1975 and don’t have street side garage access with parking pad in front. It’s hard enough finding a parking spot let alone face the prospect of such an exorbitant increase in fees.

Kathy Dunbabin
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 3:42pm 02-27-23
After purchasing the Parking Permits for 40 years, my recommendation would be that:

Each unit (residence) be allowed up to 4 parking permits and 1 visitor permit at the rate to be determined ($40 at this time). Required information for each permit would include the occupant's driver license showing the unit's address and the car's registration showing the occupant's name and unit's address.

Additional permits would be charged incrementally more... There should be a reasonable limit to the number of permits per unit.

At my residence I do have plenty of parking on my property; however there are times when I need to park on the street. I prefer having a permit instead of receiving a parking ticket.

Thanks for your consideration..

Alex Sola
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 3:18pm 02-27-23
1244
Extending on my previous proposal of a Subscription parking pass on currently free parking areas:

The proposal to create a Free Parking Subscription for non-residents has several justifications for a possible implementation. One of the primary reasons is that it would generate more revenue for the city. By turning free parking areas into subscription parking areas, anyone from inside or outside Hermosa would be able to purchase a subscription pass at a reduced cost of (for example) $25 per year, and park in those farther areas. This would push people to park in more expensive and central meters, or get the subscription pass and park for free a bit farther.

Implementing this measure would also alleviate traffic congestion in central areas, improving air quality, reducing noise, and CO emissions. Furthermore, it could help diversify the busy commercial areas, pushing for more business around 2nd/Herondo or 27th.

The cost of implementation is minimal, as it would only require signage updates in certain areas. With good promotion of the initiative on different parking meters in town, social media, and future town events, it could attract thousands of non-resident subscribers. In fact, 10,000 subscribers from out of town could generate more revenue than the current proposal with under 9,000 resident permits, and all that money is coming from non-residents.

Another important justification for this proposal is the data it could collect. Contact information, age, and other segmentation parameters could be collected, helping to understand who is visiting Hermosa. This data could be used to engage with people from out of town, promote local activities and events, or share information about the town to keep visitors coming and spending money in the community.

This is one of many examples of constructive policies that can be designed. In a community is certainly difficult if not impossible to please everyone, but is not difficult to get everyone upset by touching what is already working (and making it more expensive). See you tomorrow for further discussion and more insight.

Warmly,
Alex Sola
Megg Sulzinger
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 2:53pm 02-27-23
I strongly oppose this increase in cost and tiered system. It is extremely unfair and unnecessary to punish 93% of residents who do not abuse the parking pass program. This system was not put in place to be a revenue source for the city and now you want to put an unnecessary financial burden on the majority of residents. It is already extremely expensive to live here with studio apartments exceeding $2000/month. Let me remind you it is city staff that issued an excessive number of permits to those who abused the system. Why don’t you start with figuring out how a single address was issued that many permits before enacting a new rule. Under this new system a sticker and a pass would cost $200. This is more than doubling what this same resident paid in 2022. As you know having a parking pass doesn’t guarantee you a spot. Every day there is street sweeping residents have to constantly drive around sometimes for over 30 minutes or be forced to park at a paid meter or park extremely far from their actual residence. There is absolutely no reason for a tiered system when over 50% of the community are renters living with multiple roommates. If you want to limit a residence to 4 passes which already represent 93% of the community that is reasonable but increasing the cost of a non-guaranteed parking spot is extremely irresponsible and a financial burden. Additionally 65% of residents get 2 or less passes. You are creating a problem for the majority in response to a minority. Please do not approve this tiered system. All passes should be the same price.

Ryan Baczek
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 2:08pm 02-27-23
Too expensive and i can barely find a spot for my one car to begin with. Half the time i need to use a meter until spots open up.

Test Test
1245
Location:

Submitted At: 2:02pm 02-27-23
Test Test
Alexandre Sola
Location:

Submitted At: 1:49pm 02-27-23
Strong Objection to Proposed Increase in Resident Parking Permits Dear City Council,
I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed increase in resident parking permits. This proposal lacks empathy and creative leadership, and will only exacerbate the current struggle to find parking in our community, particularly during summer months or street cleaning days.

I find it particularly problematic that our street parking spots are often occupied by trucks from never-ending construction sites, and I believe that the cost of temporary permits for construction vehicles should be revised and covered by the owner of the construction site.

While I believe that limiting the number of permits to three stickers plus one visitor hanging pass is reasonable, I cannot support an increase in the cost associated with these permits.

Furthermore, I am disappointed that the council did not introduce this measure before the elections, and now with the control of the council, it feels as though you are betraying your voters by implementing this classist taxation.

Instead, I urge you to consider solutions that benefit the community as a whole, such as creating more free parking areas like Ardmore St. This would allow visitors to decide if they want to park farther away and walk our beautiful streets, pass by our local businesses, and still enjoy our beach. You could even consider a year pass for people out of town that allows free parking on farther streets from the beach, pushing regular visitors to more affordable options and encouraging eventual visitors to pay a premium cost to be close to the beach.

As politicians in charge of the Hermosa Council, I implore you to do better. Please find solutions that benefit the entire community, keep our streets clean and lively, maintain the landscape and hardscape in good condition, promote local sports, and activate initiatives to promote local business. Raising the cost for resident street parking will not make Hermosa a better place.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Alex Sola
David Brandin
Location:

Submitted At: 12:04pm 02-27-23
I oppose the raise in prices with a tier system.

There shouldn’t be a financial burden to parking in Hermosa which is already a quite expensive place to live.

Limiting the amount of permits per household to 4 is reasonable, but adding a financial cost on residents is ridiculous.

R D
Location:

Submitted At: 11:47am 02-27-23
Strong Objection to Proposed Increase in Employee Parking Permits Dear City Council & Staff,
1246
I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed increase in employee parking permits in the City of Hermosa Beach. As a concerned citizen, I believe that such an increase will be an unnecessary burden on the hospitality and retail workers we need and who can least afford it. The current employee parking permit fees are already excessively high compared to those of neighboring cities such as Manhattan and Redondo Beach.

The hospitality and retail workers in Hermosa Beach already struggle to make ends meet, and an increase in employee parking permits will only add to their financial difficulties. According to a study conducted by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the average renter in California has to earn $35.20 per hour to afford a two-bedroom apartment. However, the average hourly wage for a retail worker in California is only $14.47 per hour, and for a hospitality worker, it is $12.16 per hour. These workers already face significant financial challenges, and an increase in employee parking permit fees will only exacerbate their struggles.

In light of these concerns, I urge you to reconsider the proposed increase in employee parking permit fees.

Instead, I urge you to explore alternative solutions that will not put an additional financial burden on the workers who can least afford it. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Raymond Dussault
Ira Ellman
Location:

Submitted At: 11:42am 02-27-23
The quantity of parking passes purchased by some of our residents is ridiculous. Such abuse reduces visitors (and unpermitted residents) ability to find parking in downtown and adjacent areas. The staff’s recommendation of a maximum of four does not go far enough. In addition, although the city shouldn’t gauge residents for the price of these permits, $40 (11 cents a day) seems too low to park on city property. Therefore, I recommend the City limit the number of parking passes to three for year one. Next year, this would be reduced to two, which would allow residents a year to clean out their garages or make other arrangements. Parking passes should be increased to $60/$120/$180, which equates to 16 cents, 33 cents and 49 cents per day, respectively. These fees should be increased every few years based on inflation rate. In addition, I would raise 8 PM to 2 AM parking to $2.00, but leave parking during the day at $1.25. These recommendations would increase access to downtown businesses and residents, while still charging nominal and competitive rates.

Stephanie Palmer
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 11:35am 02-27-23
I agree with a majority of the people that are opposing this new tier payment system. The intent of the parking permit was to lift the parking burden and not now create a financial burden. Limiting the amount of permits per household to 4 is reasonable, but adding another financial cost on residents is ridiculous.

Vardan Balyan
Location: 90254, HERMOSA BEACH
Submitted At: 11:17am 02-27-23
Dear City Council & Staff,
I oppose the proposed tiered parking permit system for Hermosa Beach, as it would negatively impact our community's livability, sustainability, diversity and equity.

The Residential Parking Program was not meant to generate revenue, but to provide affordable parking for residents. While some may abuse the system, punishing the entire community - 93 percent of residents have four or fewer permits - is unfair when there are other solutions.

The proposed system would make it harder for residents to park on the street, especially low- and moderateincome residents who rely on it. This could lead to increased traffic, pollution, and negative impacts on public health. Additionally, the proposed tiered system would act as a regressive tax, with low-income residents being disproportionately affected. This would tend to drive more of those low- and moderate-income residents - who 1247
often work locally - to live elsewhere and drive in for work, increasing traffic congestion, air pollution, and carbon emissions, all of which have negative impacts on the environment and public health.

I urge you to maintain the current system or at least only increase costs when households exceed four or more permits.

Sincerely,
Vardan Balyan
Maxwell Benoit
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 10:47am 02-27-23
This new policy is class warfare. You are taxing people who can’t afford to own their own beach house and procure roommates out of financial necessity. It’s bad enough we got to navigate the politics of adult roommates now we are getting taxed more for this pleasure.

Raymond Dussault
Location: 90254, HERMOSA BEACH
Submitted At: 9:54am 02-27-23
Dear City Council & Staff,
I oppose the proposed tiered parking permit system for Hermosa Beach, as it would negatively impact our community's livability, sustainability, diversity and equity.

The proposed system would make it harder for residents to park on the street, especially low- and moderateincome residents who rely on it. This could lead to increased traffic, pollution, and negative impacts on public health. Additionally, the proposed tiered system would act as a regressive tax, with low-income residents being disproportionately affected. This would tend to drive more of those low- and moderate-income residents - who often work locally - to live elsewhere and drive in for work, increasing traffic congestion, air pollution, and carbon emissions, all of which have negative impacts on the environment and public health.

I urge you to maintain the current system or at least only increase costs when households exceed four or more permits.

Sincerely,
Raymond Dussault
Hermosa BCHBOY
Location: 90254
Submitted At: 7:07pm 02-26-23
This is absolutely ridiculous. The amount you want to raise our parking permit. look at Huntington Beach fees for parking permits much lower than ours now and you want to raise ours. I’ve been living in Hermosa beach 51 years, I agree with one of the other comments someone made, you do not take care of Hermosa Beach residence. Very sad!!!
Debbie Leshane
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 7:07pm 02-26-23
I oppose the raise in parking pass. Will be at the meeting Tuesday.

Please stop making Hermosa too expensive for us residents. 1248
Carol Wood
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 6:50pm 02-26-23
I oppose increases on
Resident passes and
the guest pass. There
needs to be something
done with all the trucks
that the construction people
park on our streets as I usually
never find a place to leave off groceries during the day as the building on my block
has been going on for many
years. This is not right. Many
of them don’t have passes.

It is a crazy making situation!
I’ve been here for 37 years.

The parking spaces keep
dwindling because of new
construction too. I do use
my garage for parking.
celeste coar
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 5:10pm 02-26-23
Please provide affordable single day pass option for residents so that a visitor or service provider may use it on ocassion. I'm ok with the $40.guest pass a year for this purpose, but $150. is way too expensive. Will we still have 10 passes for residents for a certain day? How could that be modified so residents could pay for a couple single use passes a year?
Liz S
Location:

Submitted At: 2:11pm 02-26-23
We just heard about this today from our neighbor. We already pay to much for our two permits every year. This is the final straw with this awful hermosa government. The hermosa parking and taxing and constant hermosa ticketing operation of hermosa people has gone from painful to nightmare. Why is hemosa government out to get it’s own residents all time: Government is wrong charging people more then $10 for a permit an park in there own street. And for each person’s car at hermosa address. Any more then that cost for the permit shoud come from the meter and ticket money the city makes to park in our own street. Juust take the parking meters out from our street. We lost trust for hermosa government many years ago. Now the last years hermosa government is worse all the time. Every day more tax,, more fees more government harrassment. We’ll probably sell like other longterm owners did and are doing. hermosa government doesn't care for hermosa people. just more proof with this.

Shauna Valenzuela
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 1:42pm 02-26-23
I think a small increase to $50.00 per car is warranted. In a county that has horrible public transportation, it is necessary to drive, so if you have more than two drivers living at the same residence, they should all be able to get a parking pass for their car. In order for anyone to visit you, you need a guest pass. A small increase on that pass is also acceptable but $100 is too much. Shame on the parking department that they let people game the system by giving out a huge number of passes. Most of us just want to be able to survive the spring/summer months when your neighborhood is overrun with visitors.

Bo Webber
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach, CA
Submitted At: 10:43am 02-26-23
1249
I have four licensed drivers that reside at our home along with four vehicles registered to our home address. I feel that the number of vehicles registered to your home should correlate with the number of parking passes available to residents and one guest pass per address should also be available. The proposed tiered system is completely off base. Hermosa Beach residents already pay substantial property taxes and I don't see the need to try and squeeze out a few extra dollars from residents.

Michael Miller
Location: 90254, Hermosa Beach
Submitted At: 6:56am 02-26-23
I am very much against this increase. Raising prices just because they haven’t been raised in awhile is not a valid reason. I’m fine limiting the number os passes per household but leave the price alone.

VeryUpsetWithCouncil Resident
Location:

Submitted At: 5:33pm 02-25-23
MASSIVELY OPPOSE! TIME FOR A PEOPLES INITIATIVE TO TAKE THIS TAXING ABUSE OF REENTERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS BACK FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.

Yellow meters are clerarly a revenue generator for the city in the residential zoned areas and to discourage excessive impact of beach visitors from blocking out the ability for the residents to park.

The residents have permitted the yellow meters for that purpose ONLY and in doing so, have put up with having to obtain a permit to park on their own streets. That's something Manhattan Beach residents have not agreed to do in their beach area.

Rersidential permits are supposed to cost no more than the initial cost of setting up an account for a permit, and then a lesser amount to process an annual or bi-annual paymentj and receive a sticker. This permitting cost is not suipposed to be a revenue generator and tax on renters and property owners living in city! Can you imagine what the residents would do to the Manhattan City Council if they tried to do what Hermosa Beach is doing incrementally? Why does Manhattan Beach not have meters in the beach area except in their commercial zones downtwon? Why is that?
Hermosa Resident
Location:

Submitted At: 4:43pm 02-25-23
For comparison sake, from Huntington Beach website: "The City recently updated our permit parking costs. The new fees are: $24 for first permit (including 2 guest passes), $10 for each additional permit. Residents are also responsible for a fair share payment of costs to establish the permit parking district (fabrication and installation of signs). This is typically in the range of $20-$40 per address and is a one-time cost. Permits are typically valid for a period of 3-5 years (new permits typically not purchased annually).:
m henderson
Location: 90254
Submitted At: 2:17pm 02-25-23
I completely agree with Steven Peterson's well-thought-out comments. Residential parking permits should not be considered as a revenue generator for the city.

Steven Peterson
Location:

Submitted At: 12:51pm 02-24-23
As a "participant" in this program since its inception, I have long ago acquiesced to the idea of paying the city to park in front of my house as a way to discourage visitors from parking for free to visit our beach. One idea I cannot accept that there is a "Market Price" for this residential privilege. The price should offset enforcement costs and no more. It should not be considered as a revenue generator for the city. Considering the specific proposal: Limiting the number of permits per address is sound. A tired pricing structure is understandable. 1250
Treating a Guest permit at the highest tier is objectionable. Instead, treat the Guest permit within the tiered pricing so as not to penalize those of us who modestly buy 1 Regular and 1 Guest. Also, consistent with other city license programs, implement a fee discount for Seniors, etc. 1251
From: Raymond Dussault
To: Suja Lowenthal; Myra Maravilla; City Council; City Clerk Subject: Opposing the Proposed Tiered Parking Permit System Date: Monday, February 27, 2023 9:46:08 AM
Dear City Council & Staff:

I oppose the proposed tiered parking permit system being considered for the City of Hermosa Beach.

I believe that this proposed system would have negative impacts on the livability, sustainability, and equity of our community.

The Residential Parking Program was never intended to drive revenue for the city. It was implemented at cost for residents because previous staffs and councils recognized the right of residents to park near their own homes.

Much has been made of residents that may be abusing the system but City Staff’s own data indicates that 93 percent of residences have four or fewer permits. It is unfair to punish the entire community when other, less broad solutions can be used to deal with perceived scofflaws.

The proposed system would undermine the livability of our community by making it more difficult for residents to park on the street. Parking is an essential component of urban life, and it should be affordable and accessible to all residents. It would impact low- and moderate-income residents, who rely on street parking and more often live in multi-family households, the most making it difficult to access necessary resources and amenities in our community.

As such, it is a regressive tax, making it more difficult for low- and moderate-income people, often local workers, to reside in Hermosa Beach. Making it more difficult for residents to park on the street would force more of those workers to live outside the community and to drive to work, school, and other destinations, leading to increased traffic congestion, air pollution, and carbon emissions, all of which have negative impacts on the environment and public health. This could also have a negative impact on the diversity of our community, as low-income families, people of color, and immigrants would be disproportionately affected.

For example, under the proposed structure, a residence with four roommates – very common – would pay an average of $82/permit. With more than four roommates, some residents will be completely frozen out. These roommates are most likely to be residents with no access to offstreet parking of any kind.

I urge the City Council to reconsider the proposal and maintain the current system, which is fair, reasonable, and affordable for all residents. At a minimum, please only change the cost when a residence exceeds a specified number of permits, allowing, at a minimum, four permits per household before costs increase.

Sincerely,
Raymond Dussault
--
Raymond Dussault
33 North Ventures, Inc.

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Phone: (916) 205-1844
1252
From: Kelly Kinnon <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 1:22 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>; Suja Lowenthal <[email protected]>; Ann Yang <[email protected]>
Subject: URGENT - ecomments not functioning
I went to add my thoughts re: the parking policy issues coming up tomorrow via ecomments. It indicates there are 23 comments for the meeting, and 19 (80%) relate to parking item.

There was no way for me to add a comment. Who knows how many others have had this problem? I have heard from others that this is a common glitch.

I note that the last time this came up, in 2011, all affected residents re: residential permits got a mailed notice ahead of time. And there was an overwhelming response (see Jan. 11, 2011 video and the 200 comments that were sent in, attached for your reference and which you should add to the record for the upcoming meeting and review, as many of the observations are still valid).

I have some views on the new policies (no, not all negative as you might surmise), which I will share separately, but I think in the interest of true transparency and given the direct effect on so many residents, the fact that separate notice was given last time, and the fact that ecomments are not even working, you should continue this item, send out separate notices, and hear it at the next meeting. I think that to do otherwise will risk a large backlash from many, many residents when they get the new bills, if you should decide to raise the price.

Thanks,
Kelly
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
1253
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 28, 2023
MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2022-23
(Finance Director Viki Copeland)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers, and fund balances as shown herein and in the attached Revenue Detail Report, Additional Appropriations Report, Budget Transfers Report, and Budget Summary Report (Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 4);

2. Approve the following transactions from the General Fund:
a) Transfer $281,758 to the assigned fund balance for Contingencies in order to maintain the City’s target of 16 percent of appropriations for this fund (Attachment 5); b) Transfer $7,858 to the assigned fund balance for Compensated Absences in order to maintain the City’s target of 25 percent of accrued leave balances (Attachment 5); c) Transfer $3,835,617 of unspent funds from 2021-22 from the unassigned fund balance category to the assigned fund balance category;
d) Transfer $2,012,273 of unspent funds from 2020-21 from the unassigned fund balance category for use in the Capital Improvement Fund; and
e) Transfer the remaining balance of $1,521,689 of unspent funds from 2022-23 for use in the Insurance and Equipment Funds; and

3. Receive and file the City Council Travel Summary (Attachment 6).

Executive Summary:

With an estimated revenue increase of 4.7 percent or $2,167,077 and changes in the General Fund balance for restricted General Plan Maintenance Fees, Public Educational and Government (PEG) Grant, and Certified Access Specialist (CASp) fees, funds are available to cover the midyear requests for additional appropriations of $585,648, an increase to the Contingency (Rainy Day Fund) of $281,758, an increase to the assigned balance for Compensated Absences of $7,858 and transfer of the remaining balance of $1,521,689 to maintain goal amounts in the Insurance and Equipment Replacement Funds.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1254
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Background:

The City has conducted an annual Midyear Budget Review since fiscal year 1981-82. The review is a tool to ensure that assumptions and estimates originally used to prepare the budget ten months earlier remain realistic. All revisions would be recorded as of January 31, 2023 so that midyear revisions for revenue and appropriations would reflect in the 2022-23 Budget worksheets used for preparation of the 2023-24 Budget.

The City Council Conference/Travel Summary was requested by City Council in 2014-15 and continues to be provided as an information item (Attachment 6).

Analysis:

OVERVIEW
The Midyear Budget Review estimates an increase in revenue of 4.7 percent or $2,167,077. Staff recommends adjusting the City’s Contingency (Rainy Day Fund) to the goal of 16 percent of appropriations for operations by adding $281,758, adding $7,858 to the Compensated Absences assigned fund balance to meet the funding goal of 25 percent of accrued leave, and transferring any remaining funds to the Insurance Fund to meet the funding goal of $3,000,000 and replenish the Equipment Replacement Fund. Staff also recommends transferring the remaining 2020-21 unspent funds of $2,012,273 in the assigned fund balance in the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund to replenish the balance. Finally, staff recommends leaving unspent funds of $3,835,617 from 2021-22 as a part of the assigned fund balance in the General Fund for the 2023-24 Budget. During budget preparation, staff will evaluate whether there are sufficient funds available to transfer according to the City’s fund balance policies outlined later in the staff report or if these funds should be used in the 2023-24 Budget.

REVENUE
(Refer to Attachment 1, Midyear Revenue Detail Report, for individual revenue accounts.) Revenue is estimated to increase 4.7 percent over the 2022-23 Budget. The following chart shows revenue by category and the following graphs show trends for the largest tax revenue sources:
2022-23 2022-23 Increase %
General Fund Revised Budget Midyear Revision (Decrease) Change Property Taxes 22,055,924 22,359,658 303,734 1.4%
Sales Taxes 3,550,145 3,752,006 201,861 5.7%
Utility User's Tax 2,262,450 2,516,494 254,044 11.2%
Transient Occupancy Tax 3,856,344 5,109,879 1,253,535 32.5% Other Taxes 2,638,981 2,587,620 (51,361) -1.9%
Licenses and Permits 1,408,690 1,504,280 95,590 6.8%
Fines & Forfeitures 1,753,010 1,740,260 (12,750) -0.7%
Use of Money & Property 988,228 1,181,616 193,388 19.6% 2022-23 Midyear Revenue by Category
City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1255
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
2022-23 2022-23 Increase %
General Fund Revised Budget Midyear Revision (Decrease) Change Property Taxes 22,055,924 22,359,658 303,734 1.4%
Sales Taxes 3,550,145 3,752,006 201,861 5.7%
Utility User's Tax 2,262,450 2,516,494 254,044 11.2%
Transient Occupancy Tax 3,856,344 5,109,879 1,253,535 32.5% Other Taxes 2,638,981 2,587,620 (51,361) -1.9%
Licenses and Permits 1,408,690 1,504,280 95,590 6.8%
Fines & Forfeitures 1,753,010 1,740,260 (12,750) -0.7%
Use of Money & Property 988,228 1,181,616 193,388 19.6% Intergovernmental/State 146,636 155,781 9,145 6.2%
Current Service Charges 7,686,027 7,455,785 (230,242) -3.0% Other Revenue 107,980 258,113 150,133 139.0%
Total 46,454,415 48,621,492 2,167,077 4.7%
2022-23 Midyear Revenue by Category
TAXES
Property Tax
The estimate for overall property tax revenue is increased by 1.4 percent. The midyear estimate for the secured portion of the property tax or “real property,” which is land and personal property located upon that property of the same owner, is 1.3 percent over the original estimate or six percent over the prior FY 2021-22. The new estimate is $17,973,918. Growth for the prior four years was five percent, seven percent, six percent, and six percent, respectively.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1256
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Sales Tax
The chart below shows that 2021-22 ended at a higher level than predicted, 15 percent over the prior year and 20 percent higher than 2018-19. An increase of 20 percent over the 2018-19 level, suggests a strong recovery and growth since the COVID-19 closures.

Comparison of Sales Tax by Class
2018-19 through 2021-22
City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1257
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
The sales tax revenue estimate is increased to $3,752,006, an increase of 5.7 percent over the original budgeted amount.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1258
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
The following chart compares sales tax on major accounts for only the first quarter of this year to the first quarter of last year for the top ten business classes and by geographic area. Detailed information on sales tax is only available for the first quarter due to the one quarter lag in information from the State.

Sales tax for the most recent quarter, which is July-September 2022 is two percent higher than the same quarter last year, which combined with the higher-than-expected sales tax for 2021-22 is a good trend.

As shown in the chart on the following page, the category with the highest sales tax overall is still Eating/Drinking Places, which grew by 4.53 percent over 2021-22, followed by the County/State Pool.

This category reflects internet sales from shopping remotely. The categories with the next highest dollar increase are Building Materials and Total Business, Service, Repair.

Comparison of Sales Tax by Class FY
First Quarter (Q1) 2021-22 vs. 2022-23
% OF
TOTAL
Retail Group
Eating/Drinking Places 317,617 $13,755 4.53% 33.98%
Building Materials 80,621 $10,314 14.67% 8.63%
Other Retail 74,809 ($17,655) -19.09% 8.00%
Food Stores 64,016 ($1,319) -2.17% 6.37%
Service Stations
Auto Dealers & Supplies 41,543 ($10,437) -20.08% 4.44%
Drug Stores-- CONFIDENTIAL --
RANK / BUSINESS CLASS* INC/(DEC) % CHANGE

SALES TAX PREVIOUS YEAR
2022-23
-- CONFIDENTIAL --
City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1259
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
% OF
TOTAL
Retail Group
Eating/Drinking Places 317,617 $13,755 4.53% 33.98%
Building Materials 80,621 $10,314 14.67% 8.63%
Other Retail 74,809 ($17,655) -19.09% 8.00%
Food Stores 64,016 ($1,319) -2.17% 6.37%
Service Stations
Auto Dealers & Supplies 41,543 ($10,437) -20.08% 4.44%
Drug Stores
All Other Retail 19,849 $505 2.61% 2.12%
Furniture/Appliance 19,571 $3,184 19.43% 2.09%
Apparel Stores 15,656 ($2,516) -13.85% 1.68%
Total Retail Group 696,372 $13,443 1.97% 74.50%
County/State Pool 154,584 ($20,011) -11.46% 16.54%
Total Business, Service, 52,066 $18,031 52.98% 5.57%
Repair
Total Manufacturing 31,325 $8,806 39.10% 3.35%
& Wholesale
Total Non-Store/Part Time 330 ($156) -32.10% 0.04%
Retailers/Adjustments
Total Sales Tax Receipts 934,677 $ 20,113 2.20% 100%
* Threshold for inclusion, $300 per quarter
-- CONFIDENTIAL --
CONFIDENTIAL: Business class sales tax information is deemed confidential if there are four or less businesses in a class or if a single class member's share is a disproportionate percentage of the total.

RANK / BUSINESS CLASS* INC/(DEC) % CHANGE

SALES TAX PREVIOUS YEAR
2022-23
-- CONFIDENTIAL --
Sales Tax Comparison by Geographic Area
Revenue % of % Revenue % OF
LOCATION 2021-22 Total Change 2022-23 Total
Downtown $ 373,029 45% 4% $ 388,542 45%
PCH 309,241 37% 3% 319,505 37%
Pier/Valley/Monterey 119,323 14% 1% 120,362 14%
Aviation 30,097 4% -6% 28,218 4%
City of Hermosa Beach Page 7 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1260
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Transient Occupancy Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) receipts for the first half (through November) are 32.5 percent higher than budget. Again, receipts for the prior year were higher than expected at $4,730,760 and were 46 percent higher than 2020-21. Occupancy is 81.3 percent for the first half of this year vs. 78.1 percent for last year.

In November 2019, the voters passed Measure H which increased the Transient Occupancy Tax from 12 percent to 14 percent, effective January 1, 2020. A new hotel and five short-term vacation rental properties with a total of 15 rental units have been added since 2018-19.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 8 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1261
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Utility User Tax
The estimate for Utility User Tax (UUT) revenue is increased by 11.2 percent from the original budget and an increase of six percent over 2021-22 revenue. Revenue for the first half is up 15 percent. The largest increases for the first half are in electric, water, and cable as shown in the pie chart on the next page.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 9 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1262
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Other Tax
The 1.9 percent decrease in the Other Tax category is primarily due to a decrease in transfer tax and business license revenue. There was the sale of two large condominium complexes in 2021-22, which lead to a one-time increase in transfer tax. Business licenses declined 14 percent from 2020-21 but are up 9 percent for the first half of 2022-23.

Licenses and Permits
This category is increased by 6.8 percent, primarily due to an increase in building permits.

Fines and Forfeitures
This category is reduced by $12,750 or 0.7 percent due to a decrease in nuisance abatementrestroom fines.

Use of Money and Property
This category is increased by 19.6 percent due to an increase in interest rates and a shift in cash balances to higher yielding accounts.

Intergovernmental/State
This category is increased by 6.2 percent due to one-time reimbursement of older mandated cost claims and an increase in Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) and Standards and Training for Corrections (STC) Service Officer Training reimbursements.

Current Service Charges
The estimates for User Fees or Service Charges are down three percent. There are many accounts in this category, some increase and some decrease. Plan check fees vary from year to year and are down from 2021-22. Temporary Outdoor Dining Encroachments are less than originally budgeted due to reduced participation and North Pier Parking Structure Revenue is down.

Other Revenue
Funds received in the General Miscellaneous, Reimbursement/Refund and Contribution (donations) accounts are included in the midyear revenue estimates. No revenue is assumed in the original budget for these revenue sources. Appropriations have already been added where a donation is intended to be spent. The increase in this category is primarily due to $100,000 payment from Athens as a part of the newly negotiated contract.

ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
Additional appropriations requested by departments are shown on the attached spreadsheet, 2022- 23 Additional Appropriations Report (Attachment 2). Overall appropriations in the General Fund increased by $585,648. Included in the Additional Appropriations Report is a request for a contract City of Hermosa Beach Page 10 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1263
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
increased by $585,648. Included in the Additional Appropriations Report is a request for a contract increase of $10,000 for the contract organizer for the City Clerk Records Center. The contract expense is over the contract limit for City Manager and requires City Council approval. A new parttime temporary intern is recommended to assist with the Records Center, and the reclassification of two full-time permanent positions is recommended.

Several grants have been awarded to the City. Revenue estimates have been adjusted and additional appropriations have been requested accordingly.

Several Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) have been added: CIP 606 Longfellow Sidewalk Improvements, CIP 607 Record Center Renovation, and CIP 610 Forts Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Improvements (Attachment 7).

RESULT OF CHANGES
As a result of changes to estimated revenue, appropriation revisions, General Plan Maintenance Fees, and the PEG Grant, a balance of $1,811,305 is available in the General Fund.

Staff recommends that those funds be used in the following manner:
· Assign additional funds of $281,758 from the balance available in the General Fund to bring the Contingency up to the goal amount of 16 percent of General Fund operating appropriations;
· Assign additional funds of $7,858 from the balance available in the General Fund to bring the Compensated Absences up to the goal of 25 percent of the current accrued leave liability balance,
· Transfer the remaining available balance of $1,521,689 to the Insurance and Equipment Replacement Funds in accordance with the financial policies listed below.

FINANCIAL POLICIES
The City Council’s adopted fund balance policies are:

General Fund
Any funds remaining unspent at year-end in the General Fund transfer equally to the Contingency Balance, Insurance Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund, the Capital Improvement Fund, and Capital Facility Reserve. The City Council may change these transfers annually as necessary.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 11 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1264
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Contingency Balance
The goal is to maintain an amount equal to 16 percent of the General Fund operating appropriations to be used in the event of economic uncertainties or unforeseen emergencies.

Compensated Absences Balance
The goal is to maintain 25 percent of the funding needed for accrued liabilities for employee vacation, sick, and compensatory time.

Retirement Rate Stabilization Balance
These funds were set aside in the 2004-05 Budget for use during times of rate volatility. The 2018-19 Budget approved that the existing balance of $1 million be used for the creation of a retirement trust however that action is on hold pending COVID-19. The current balance is $1,021,575.

Insurance Fund
The goal is to maintain $3,000,000 in net position for claims above recorded claims liabilities or catastrophic losses.

Equipment Replacement Fund
The goal is to maintain net position equal to the accumulated amount calculated on the equipment replacement schedule for all equipment, based on replacement cost and useful life.

RESULTS OF 2021-2022
For 2021-22, the unspent funds of $3,835,617 remained in the General Fund and are currently unassigned. Revenue was up $1.3 million or 2.8 percent over budget in 2021-22, primarily due to sales tax, TOT, Court Fines/Parking, parking related revenue, In Lieu Fee/Parking Facility, and contract recreation classes. Expenditures were under budget by $3.1 million or 6 percent of which $173,267 was reappropriated to the 2022-23 budget for one-time purchases that were delayed or for ongoing projects. $40,111 was carried forward to the 2022-21 for CIPs. Expenditures were lower overall primarily due to salary savings from vacant positions or staff out on leave. The remaining difference of approximately $600,000 came from changes to reserved fund balance for General Plan Maintenance Fees, PEG funds, In Lieu Fee/Parking Facility, and Certified Assess Specialist (CASp) fees.

Due the use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to balance the previous two annual budgets, staff recommends reserving the funds in the General Fund. Once the 2023-24 Budget estimates are reviewed, recommendations would be made regarding the 2021-22 unspent funds and any unappropriated funds from 2022-23. Use of these funds will be determined in conjunction with the 2023-24 budget requests.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 12 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1265
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
Progress on Funding Goals
Fund Name Goal
Estimated Fund
Balance
12/31/2022
Estimated Fund
Balance
6/30/2023 After
Midyear Change
Over/(Under)
Goal Amount
Compensated
Absences Balance $286,312 $7,858 1 $294,170 $0
Contingency
Balance $281,758 1 $7,588,784 $0
Equipment
Replacement Fund $3,511,262 $2,840,835 $645,035 1 $3,485,870 ($25,392) 1 From General Fund available fund balance.

Insurance Fund $3,000,000 $0
Recommended
Midyear Change
$7,588,784,
16% of
Operating
Budget
$294,170,
25% of Current
Liability
$3,000,000 $2,123,346
$7,307,026
$876,654 1
As shown in the Over/(Under) Goal Amount column, the Compensated Absences and Contingency Balance goals are at the target amounts after the recommended changes. Due to the annual adjustment to the claims liabilities, ongoing litigation costs, settlements, and additional appropriations recommended at Midyear, the balance in the Insurance Fund is under the $3,000,000 goal. Claims liabilities will be adjusted in the Insurance Fund at year end based on actuarial reports typically received in May for Worker’s Compensation and General Liability Claims. Staff recommends transferring $876,654 of the $1,521,689 available fund balance in the General Fund to the Insurance Fund to bring the balance back up to the funding goal of $3,000,000. Staff recommends using the remaining $645,035 to bring the Equipment Replacement Fund within $25,392 of the target funding goal of $3,511,262.

USE OF 2020-2021 UNSPENT FUNDS
The December 31, 2022 balance of 2020-21 unspent funds is $2,330,733. At the February 2, 2023 City Council meeting, an additional appropriation of $300,000 was approved for CIP 669 City Park Restrooms and Renovations from these funds. The final Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) from labor negotiations, the Police Management MOU, is pending City Council approval for $18,460. The available balance of unspent funds, taking these additional appropriations into account, is $2,012,273. Staff recommends transferring the remaining 2020-21 unspent funds balance available City of Hermosa Beach Page 13 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1266
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
$2,012,273. Staff recommends transferring the remaining 2020-21 unspent funds balance available from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund to make funds available for future CIP requests. The Capital Improvement Fund has an estimated fund balance of $77,707 as of December 31, 2022. After the recommended transfer, the balance would be $2,089,980.

UPCOMING/ONGOING CHALLENGES
With approval of the Midyear changes by the City Council, staff would move forward with preparation of the 2023-24 Budget. While the current revenue estimates point to positive growth, staff will remain conservative in its approach to the budget process for next year due to the many uncertainties present in the economy.
2023-24 BUDGET WORKSHOP
The Capital Improvement Plan Study Session is planned for April 20, 2023. The Budget Study Session is scheduled for June 1, 2023 at 6:00 pm, with adoption planned for June 13, 2023.

General Plan Consistency:

PLAN Hermosa, the City’s long-range planning document, was adopted by the City Council in August 2017, and envisions a future where “Hermosa Beach is the small town others aspire to be; a place where our beach culture, strong sense of community, and commitment to sustainability intersect.” One of the guiding principles to achieve the vision is to make decisions and take actions that help contribute to the City’s economic and fiscal stability.

This report and associated recommendations have been evaluated for their consistency with the City’s General Plan. Relevant policies are listed below:

Governance Element
Goal 1. A high degree of transparency and integrity in the decision-making process.

Policy:
· 1.1 Open meetings. Maintain the community’s trust by holding meetings in which decisions are being made, that are open and available for all community members to attend, participate, or view remotely.

Infrastructure Element
Goal 1. Infrastructure systems are functional, safe, and well maintained.

Policy:
· 1.2 Priority investments. Use City Council established priorities and the Capital Improvement City of Hermosa Beach Page 14 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1267
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0062
· 1.2 Priority investments. Use City Council established priorities and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to identify and allocate funding for projects identified in the infrastructure plan.

Public Safety Element
Goal 5. High quality police and fire protection services provided to residents and visitors.

Policy:
· 5.2 High level of response. Achieve optimal utilization of allocated public safety resources and provide desired levels of response, staffing, and protection within the community.

Fiscal Impact:

Midyear budget revisions increase revenue estimates in the General Fund by $2,167,077 and appropriations by $585,648. The Contingency (Rainy Day Fund) meets the 16 percent funding goal and the Compensated Absences balance and Insurance Fund are also at the target funding goals.

The Equipment Replacement Fund is slightly under the target funding goal and will be evaluated as a part of the 2023-24 Budget process. $3,835,617 in unspent funds from 2021-22 remain available for use in the 2023-24 Budget if necessary.

Attachments:

1. 2022-23 Revenue Detail Report

2. 2022-23 Additional Appropriations Report

3. 2022-23 Budget Transfers Report

4. 2022-23 Midyear Budget Summary Report

5. Link to City Council Adopted Fund Balance Policies

6. 2022-23 City Council Travel Summary

7. New Capital Improvement Project Requests
Respectfully Submitted by: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 15 of 15 Printed on 2/24/2023 powered by Legistar™1268
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
001 3101 Current Year Secured 17,001,253 6,724,831 7,167,439 17,745,473 17,973,918 228,445 1.3% 001 3102 Current Year Unsecured 595,892 504,665 537,527 587,996 549,459 -38,537 -6.6% 001 3103 Prior Year Collections 183,646 173,334 211,791 0 0 0 N/A 001 3106 Supplemental Roll SB813 506,078 135,160 142,908 400,000 513,826 113,826 28.5% 001 3107 Transfer Tax 685,820 443,205 149,072 453,596 421,628 -31,968 -7.0% 001 3108 Sales Tax 3,848,960 1,213,538 1,183,339 3,550,145 3,752,006 201,861 5.7% 001 3109 1/2 Cent Sales Tx Ext 299,037 105,158 97,815 282,034 282,034 0 0.0% 001 3110 Spectrum Cable TV Franchise 187,752 46,599 46,723 182,490 187,700 5,210 2.9% 001 3111 Electric Franchise 93,600 0 0 93,600 93,600 0 0.0% 001 3112 Gas Franchise 50,618 0 0 53,618 53,618 0 0.0%
001 3113 Refuse Franchise 318,517 134,168 155,939 300,000 340,000 40,000 13.3% 001 3114 Transient Occupancy Tax 4,730,760 2,041,389 2,420,507 3,856,344 5,109,879 1,253,535 32.5% 001 3115 Business License 913,747 426,762 463,086 1,162,677 1,115,040 -47,637 -4.1% 001 3120 Utility User Tax 2,369,269 954,678 1,101,903 2,262,450 2,516,494 254,044 11.2% 001 3122 Property tax In-lieu of Veh Lic Fees 3,178,888 21,561 36,466 3,322,455 3,322,455 0 0.0% 001 3123 Frontier Cable Franchise Fee 106,962 27,861 24,388 110,966 94,000 -16,966 -15.3% Total Taxes 35,070,799 12,952,908 13,738,902 34,363,844 36,325,657 1,961,813 5.7% 001 3202 Dog Licenses 26,326 23,514 25,369 27,205 27,205 0 0.0% 001 3204 Building Permits 537,077 323,227 391,789 1,142,000 1,142,000 0 0.0% 001 3205 Electric Permits 103,875 52,315 58,797 80,400 124,845 44,445 55.3% 001 3206 Plumbing Permits 83,835 47,501 54,890 66,200 101,930 35,730 54.0% 001 3207 Occupancy Permits 4,361 2,142 2,703 4,150 4,900 750 18.1% 001 3208 Grease Trap Permits 3,173 1,331 777 2,380 2,380 0 0.0% 001 3209 Garage Sales 126 84 70 100 100 0 0.0%
001 3211 Banner Permits 4,026 860 540 2,000 2,000 0 0.0% 001 3213 Animal Redemption Fee 114 54 0 162 162 0 0.0%
001 3214 Amplified Sound Permit 8,149 4,006 3,248 15,000 15,000 0 0.0% 001 3215 Temporary Sign Permit 0 0 0 558 558 0 0.0%
001 3217 Open Fire Permit 1,393 625 770 900 1,500 600 66.7% 001 3219 Newsrack Permits 325 29 0 148 148 0 0.0%
001 3225 Taxicab Franchise Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3226 Outdoor Seating Permit/Private Property 0 0 0 543 543 0 0.0% 001 3227 Mechanical Permits 94,923 52,939 38,697 60,000 72,690 12,690 21.2% 001 3228 Concealed Weapons Permit 0 0 93 100 600 500 500.0% 001 3229 Private Special Event Permit 0 0 875 0 875 875 N/A 001 3230 Temporary Minor Special Event Permit 3,233 1,061 3,029 4,344 4,344 0 0.0% 001 3236 Drone Permit Fee 2,760 1,235 1,235 2,500 2,500 0 0.0% 001 3239 A-Frame sign Permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Total Licenses and Permits 873,695 510,922 582,882 1,408,690 1,504,280 95,590 6.8% 1 Attachment 1
1269
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
001 3301 Municipal Court Fines 60,937 27,206 24,239 60,010 54,260 -5,750 -9.6% 001 3302 Court Fines /Parking 1,530,216 776,416 831,789 1,658,000 1,658,000 0 0.0% 001 3305 Administrative Fines 44,250 5,100 8,500 10,000 10,000 0 0.0% 001 3306 Nuisance Abatement-Restrooms 7,653 1,690 7,900 25,000 18,000 -7,000 -28.0% Total Fines and Forfeitures 1,643,056 810,413 872,428 1,753,010 1,740,260 -12,750 -0.7% 001 3401 Interest Income 121,553 39,718 81,315 117,849 343,783 225,934 191.7% 001 3404 Community Center Leases 16,168 1 12,702 25,406 33,104 7,698 30.3% 001 3405 Community Center Rentals 219,154 105,206 115,386 194,700 187,000 -7,700 -4.0% 001 3406 Community Center Theatre 62,780 19,239 41,383 70,000 70,000 0 0.0% 001 3414 Fund Exchange 490,000 490,000 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3418 Special Events 73,395 34,849 54,874 90,000 90,000 0 0.0% 001 3422 Beach/Plaza Promotions 55,429 53,981 43,259 12,312 43,259 30,947 251.4% 001 3425 Ground Lease 56,400 28,200 28,200 56,401 56,401 0 0.0% 001 3427 Cell Site License-Sprint/Easement Cable 2-Lo 43,220 21,003 22,460 45,481 45,785 304 N/A 001 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon/Easement Cable 3 35,775 17,710 18,242 36,848 36,848 0 N/A 001 3429 Inmate Phone Services 41 41 33 100 100 0 0.0%
001 3431 Storage Facility Operating Lease 247,200 123,600 127,308 254,616 254,616 0 0.0% 001 3432 Film Permits 51,980 20,132 4,020 83,500 15,000 -68,500 -82.0% 001 3435 Cell Site License- Crown Castle 892 0 0 0 295 295 0.0% 001 3450 Investment Discount 1,156 542 1,946 1,090 5,498 4,408 404.4% 001 3475 Investment Premium -45 0 -66 -75 -73 2 -2.1%
Total Use of Money and Property 1,475,097 954,221 551,062 988,228 1,181,616 193,388 19.6% 001 3507 Highway Maintenance 0 0 0 2,300 2,300 0 0.0%
001 3508 Mandated Costs 4,874 4,858 14,019 4,874 14,019 9,145 187.6% 001 3509 Homeowner Property Tax Relief 79,429 11,914 11,774 79,428 79,428 0 0.0% 001 3510 POST 5,167 5,167 0 30,000 30,000 0 0.0%
001 3511 STC-Service Officer Training 2,962 1,170 2,509 7,500 7,500 0 0.0% 001 3575 VLF Coll Excess of $14m-Rev code 11001.5 22,534 0 0 22,534 22,534 0 0.0% Total Intergovernmental/State 114,967 23,110 28,302 146,636 155,781 9,145 6.2% 001 3801 Residential Inspection 74,504 36,436 24,577 63,140 54,272 -8,868 -14.0% 001 3802 Planning Sign Permit/Master Sign Program 16,339 7,304 14,727 7,190 14,727 7,537 104.8% 001 3803 Environmental Impact / Negative Declaratio 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 3804 General Plan Maintenance Fees 71,346 45,315 39,594 104,900 79,188 -25,712 -24.5% 001 3805 Amendments (Panning Entitlement / Conditi 13,811 4,467 9,344 32,704 18,688 -14,016 -42.9% 001 3808 Zone Variance Review 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3809 Tentative Map Review 10,396 9,758 0 25,515 0 -25,515 -100.0% 001 3810 Final Map Review 4,488 2,193 765 3,825 3,825 0 0.0% 001 3811 Zone Change 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3812 Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other 5,070 5,070 0 15,909 15,909 0 0.0% 2 1270
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
001 3813 Plan Check Fees 396,440 256,143 192,847 406,000 243,303 -162,697 -40.1% 001 3814 Planning/Zoning Appeal 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3815 Public Works Services 114,476 64,105 64,600 96,900 96,900 0 0.0% 001 3816 Utility Trench Service Connect Permit 153,392 48,262 102,838 105,000 170,000 65,000 61.9% 001 3817 Address Change Request Fee 4,889 2,259 2,388 5,260 5,260 0 0.0% 001 3818 Police Services 3,535 887 3,107 3,000 5,000 2,000 66.7% 001 3819 Jail Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3821 Daily Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 49,848 24,862 25,358 48,407 50,344 1,937 4.0% 001 3823 Special Event Security/Police 38,155 25,344 46,311 50,000 55,000 5,000 10.0% 001 3824 500' Noticing 4,267 2,802 1,465 19,045 1,465 -17,580 -92.3% 001 3825 Public Notice Posting -189 -189 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3827 Library Grounds Maintenance 10,066 0 0 10,569 10,569 0 0.0% 001 3831 Non-Utility Street Excavation Permit / Street 30,459 13,515 15,642 26,000 26,000 0 0.0% 001 3834 Encroachment Permit 237,091 22,703 299,594 722,152 654,859 -67,293 -9.3% 001 3836 Refund Transaction Fee 5,070 2,805 2,562 6,000 6,000 0 0.0% 001 3837 Returned Check Charge 364 50 106 200 200 0 0.0% 001 3838 Sale of Maps/Publications 10 10 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3839 Photocopy Charges 659 165 231 300 300 0 0.0%
001 3840 Ambulance Transport 648,989 331,909 355,489 662,000 662,000 0 0.0% 001 3841 Police Towing 116,066 44,197 43,928 83,345 83,345 0 0.0% 001 3842 Parking Meters 2,009,448 953,439 1,051,751 1,975,108 2,107,760 132,652 6.7% 001 3843 Parking Permits-Annual 366,792 22,290 21,604 375,979 366,106 -9,873 -2.6% 001 3844 Daily Parking Permits 2,740 1,245 1,110 2,845 2,605 -240 -8.4% 001 3845 Lot A Revenue 523,854 259,245 269,052 502,000 533,661 31,661 6.3% 001 3846 North Pier Parking Structure Revenue 579,173 282,943 299,389 709,865 610,588 -99,277 -14.0% 001 3847 In Lieu Fee / Parking Facility 260,100 0 0 57,800 57,800 0 0.0% 001 3848 Driveway Permits 4,230 2,288 1,214 4,710 3,000 -1,710 -36.3% 001 3849 Guest Permits 849 433 504 500 800 300 60.0%
001 3850 Contractors Permits 29,614 15,776 16,132 28,200 29,614 1,414 5.0% 001 3851 Cash Key Revenue -55 0 -16 0 0 0 N/A
001 3852 Recreation Program Transaction Fee 81,903 24,735 23,232 70,000 70,000 0 0.0% 001 3855 Bus Passes 388 168 161 200 400 200 100.0%
001 3856 500' - 2nd Noticing 0 0 0 1,752 1,752 0 0.0%
001 3857 Parking Plan Application 0 0 0 9,786 9,786 0 0.0% 001 3858 Monthly Permit Lot A/Parking Structure 113,896 48,174 60,202 106,125 125,924 19,799 18.7% 001 3859 Admin Permit - Abandon CUP 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3861 Fire Alarm Sys Insp - New Installation 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 3862 Alarm Permit Fee 5,001 2,289 1,650 5,250 5,250 0 0.0% 001 3865 Lot B Revenue 105,549 53,898 49,090 99,009 99,009 0 0.0% 3 1271
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
001 3867 Precise Development Plans 2,897 0 5,937 16,807 16,807 0 0.0% 001 3868 Public Noticing/300 Ft Radius 6,853 4,210 2,800 4,405 4,405 0 0.0% 001 3877 Business License Application Fee 14,888 7,177 6,248 13,036 13,036 0 0.0% 001 3879 Business License Renewal Fee 39,497 17,558 19,716 35,000 40,000 5,000 14.3% 001 3880 Insurance Service Charges/Tobacco Retailer 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 3881 Tobacco Retailer Renewal 0 0 0 4,488 4,488 0 0.0% 001 3883 Final/Tentative Map Extension 3,131 2,056 0 2,150 2,150 0 0.0% 001 3884 Lot Line Adjustment 443 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3886 Text Amendment/Private 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3888 Slope/Grade Height Determination, Appeals 3,084 0 3,084 9,252 3,084 -6,168 -66.7% 001 3890 300 Ft Radius Noticing/Appeal to CC 0 0 0 263 263 0 0.0% 001 3891 Appeal of Plng Comm Action to Council 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 3893 Contract Recreation Classes 817,224 253,784 228,678 700,000 700,000 0 0.0% 001 3894 Other Recreation Programs 117,021 26,067 36,099 174,300 127,800 -46,500 -26.7% 001 3895 Zoning Information Letters 1,337 0 210 840 840 0 0.0% 001 3896 Mailing Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 3897 Admin Fee/TULIP Ins Certificate 206 426 62 0 62 62 N/A 001 3898 Height Limit Exception 4,104 4,104 0 8,586 4,104 -4,482 -52.2% 001 3899 Condo - CUP/PDP 24,515 21,060 0 27,535 27,535 0 0.0% Total Current Service Charges 7,128,220 2,953,735 3,343,381 7,443,152 7,225,783 -217,369 -2.9% 001 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 29,302 13,731 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 3903 Contributions Non Govt 64,318 44,564 20,010 0 24,108 24,108 N/A 001 3904 General Miscellaneous -15,196 983 1,684 0 101,684 101,684 N/A 001 3907 Pkg Str Utility Reimb From Beach House 5,673 0 2,049 5,000 6,000 1,000 20.0% 001 3908 Hermosa Sr Ctr Donations/Memberships 2,764 1,626 1,223 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% 001 3914 Planning EIR Admin Reimbursement 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 3938 Solid Waste Contract Admin Fee 58,296 24,290 24,953 60,000 64,500 4,500 7.5% 001 3960 Frontier PEG Grant-formerly Verizon 26,408 0 4,878 21,221 21,221 0 0.0% 001 3968 Spectrum PEG Grant-formerly TWC 28,004 9,320 9,345 18,759 37,600 18,841 100.4% Total Other Revenue 199,569 94,513 64,141 107,980 258,113 150,133 139.0% 001 6801 Mural Review/Principal Payments 484 484 2,530 1,012 1,012 0 0.0% 001 6802 Sign Variance 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 6803 General Plan Amendment/ Map or Text 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 6804 Temporary Use Permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 6808 Request for Reasonable Accomodation 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 6809 Categorical Exemption 2,181 1,365 1,872 4,284 4,284 0 0.0% 001 6810 Deed Restriction/Covenant Review 9,526 4,290 5,294 14,960 14,960 0 0.0% 001 6811 Landscape Plan Review 4,356 3,082 3,185 4,830 4,830 0 0.0% 001 6813 Director's Determination 969 405 1,139 705 705 0 0.0% 4 1272
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
001 6818 New/Modified Business Zoning Review 11,337 5,530 5,675 9,450 9,450 0 0.0% 001 6819 Historic Resource Review 0 0 3,362 2,756 2,756 0 0.0% 001 6820 Appeal to the Planning Commission 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 6821 Solar Plan Check/Inspection 9,912 3,626 7,650 4,725 7,650 2,925 61.9% 001 6822 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 134 134 0 350 350 0 0.0% 001 6825 Clean Bay Restaurant - NPDES Inspection 42,147 0 4,732 41,200 41,200 0 0.0% 001 6826 Light Industry - NPDES Inspection 3,961 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 6828 Public Improvement Plan Check 47,635 31,229 20,832 51,000 51,000 0 0.0% 001 6832 DUI Collision Response 0 0 0 1,039 1,039 0 0.0% 001 6834 Citation Sign-off 454 350 104 522 522 0 0.0%
001 6836 Police Business Background Check 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 6837 Deceased Animal Pickup 126 61 65 125 140 15 12.0% 001 6839 Pet Home Quarantine Review 0 0 0 62 70 8 12.9% 001 6840 Multiple Dog Review 232 116 242 106 520 414 390.6% 001 6847 Document Certification 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 6849 Traffic Plan Review 320 320 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 6851 Bus. License State Mandated Fee (CASp) 9,644 4,956 4,731 9,714 9,714 0 0.0% 001 6852 Tobacco Retailer Renewal 3,888 3,888 2,961 3,888 4,411 523 13.5% 001 6860 Refuse Lien Fees/Athens 654 3,219 5,892 336 700 364 108.3% 001 6861 Sewer Service Charge/Oversized Vehicle Per 683 495 329 775 775 0 N/A 001 6866 Records Technology Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
001 6867 Credit Card Processing Fee 79,098 37,679 39,377 76,700 76,700 0 0.0% 001 6871 Sewer Service Charge Rebate -9,318 -4,481 -2,633 -9,700 -9,700 0 0.0% 001 6873 Impound Fee- Bicycle, Scooters & Wheeled 141 141 0 150 158 8 5.3% 001 6874 Limited Live Entertainment Permit Fee 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 6875 Solid Waste Contract Reimbursement 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 001 6881 Public Tree Removal Permit 1,248 200 643 400 400 0 0.0% 001 6883 Stort-term Vacation Rental Permit 10,536 10,536 1,589 18,719 1,589 -17,130 -91.5% 001 6884 M-1 Limited Event Permit 0 0 0 544 544 0 0.0%
001 6885 Temporary Outdoor Dining/Retail Permit 4,526 2,496 1,264 1,660 1,660 0 0.0% 001 6886 Minor Conditional Use Permit 0 0 0 2,309 2,309 0 0.0% 001 6887 Minor Planning Sign Review 127 0 0 254 254 0 0.0% Total Current Service Charges (Continued) 235,001 110,121 110,835 242,875 230,002 -12,873 -5.3% Total General Fund 46,740,404 18,409,943 19,291,933 46,454,415 48,621,492 2,167,077 4.7% 105 3101 Current Year Secured 455,557 184,154 184,121 456,000 456,000 0 0.0% 105 3103 Prior Year Collections 3,849 3,627 3,249 7,600 3,849 -3,751 -49.4% 105 3105 Assessment Rebates -2,215 -763 -664 -2,300 -2,300 0 0.0% Total Taxes 457,191 187,019 186,706 461,300 457,549 -3,751 -0.8% 5 1273
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
105 3401 Interest Income 1,217 393 566 1,226 2,796 1,570 128.0% 105 3450 Investment Discount 11 5 16 11 45 34 306.5%
105 3475 Investment Premium -1 0 -1 -1 -1 0 -40.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 1,228 398 581 1,236 2,840 1,604 129.8% Total Other Revenue 458,419 187,417 187,287 462,536 460,389 -2,147 -0.5% Total Lighting/Landscaping District Fund 458,419 187,417 187,287 462,536 460,389 (2,147) (0.00) 115 3401 Interest Income 5,060 2,372 5,696 5,882 16,252 10,370 176.3% 115 3450 Investment Discount 53 32 121 54 260 206 381.3% 115 3475 Investment Premium -2 0 -4 -4 -3 1 -13.3%
Total Use of Money and Property 5,111 2,404 5,813 5,932 16,509 10,577 178.3% 115 3501 Section 2106 Allocation 66,626 34,904 29,571 74,860 74,860 0 0.0% 115 3502 Section 2107 Allocation 129,519 60,704 66,323 171,931 171,931 0 0.0% 115 3503 Section 2107.5 Allocation 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 0.0% 115 3512 Section 2105 (Prop 111) 108,314 56,663 47,670 125,850 125,850 0 0.0% 115 3513 Sec 2103 Higher Mtr Veh Excise Tax(HUTA) 154,287 89,161 75,547 192,114 192,114 0 0.0% 115 3566 Coastal Conservancy Grant/Loan Repayment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 115 3567 Road Maintenance Rehab Account 393,996 133,269 145,201 444,633 444,633 0 0.0% Total Intergovernmental/State 856,742 378,701 368,312 1,013,388 1,013,388 0 0.0% Total State Gas Tax Fund 861,853 381,105 374,125 1,019,320 1,029,897 10,577 1.0% 117 3401 Interest Income 1,684 643 1,664 1,510 5,461 3,951 261.6% 117 3450 Investment Discount 16 8 35 14 87 73 523.8%
117 3475 Investment Premium -1 0 -1 -1 -1 0 17.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 1,700 651 1,697 1,523 5,547 4,024 264.2% 117 3860 AB939 Surcharge 62,783 26,606 27,901 62,000 62,000 0 0.0% Total Current Service Charges 62,783 26,606 27,901 62,000 62,000 0 0.0% Total AB939 Fund 64,483 27,256 29,598 63,523 67,547 4,024 6.3% 121 3608 Maintenance Allocation 0 0 0 30,000 96,123 66,123 220.4% Total Intergovernmental/County 0 0 0 30,000 96,123 66,123 220.4% Total Prop A Open Space Fund 0 0 0 30,000 96,123 66,123 220.4% 122 3401 Interest Income 15,964 6,321 14,247 15,237 48,877 33,640 220.8% 122 3426 Easement Cable 1-2nd Street 337,932 168,966 168,966 337,932 337,932 0 0.0% 122 3450 Investment Discount 159 79 296 141 782 641 454.4% 122 3475 Investment Premium -6 0 -10 -10 -10 0 4.4%
Total Use of Money and Property 354,049 175,366 183,499 353,300 387,580 34,280 9.7% Total Tyco Fund 354,049 175,366 183,499 353,300 387,580 34,280 9.7% 125 3116 Parks & Recreation Facility Tax 0 0 0 57,526 57,526 0 0.0% Total Taxes 0 0 0 57,526 57,526 0 0.0%
6 1274
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
125 3401 Interest Income 3,066 1,483 2,120 3,592 7,681 4,089 113.8% 125 3450 Investment Discount 32 19 45 33 123 90 272.2%
125 3475 Investment Premium -1 0 -1 -2 -2 0 -18.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 3,098 1,502 2,163 3,623 7,802 4,179 115.3% 125 3910 Park/Recreation In Lieu Fee 32,678 32,678 49,364 78,616 49,364 -29,252 -37.2% Total Other Revenue 32,678 32,678 49,364 78,616 49,364 -29,252 -37.2% Total Park/Rec Facilty Tax Fund 35,776 34,180 51,527 139,765 114,692 -25,073 -17.9% 135 3401 Interest Income 44 16 37 44 133 89 202.6%
135 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 1 0 2 2 N/A
135 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 45 16 37 44 135 91 207.4% 135 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 4,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.0% Total Other Revenue 4,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.0% Total Bayview Dr District Admin Exp Fund 4,545 4,516 5,037 5,044 5,135 91 1.8% 138 3401 Interest Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
138 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Loma District Admin Exp Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
139 3401 Interest Income 34 12 27 35 100 65 184.7%
139 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 1 0 2 2 N/A
139 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 35 12 27 35 101 66 189.2% 139 3925 Special Assessment Admin Fees 3,500 3,500 3,950 3,950 3,950 0 0.0% Total Other Revenue 3,500 3,500 3,950 3,950 3,950 0 0.0% Total Beach Dr Assmnt Dist Admin Exp Fund 3,535 3,512 3,977 3,985 4,051 66 1.7% 140 3401 Interest Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
140 3720 Americans with Disabilities Act 0 0 0 135,008 233,089 98,081 72.6% Total Intergovernmental/Federal 0 0 0 135,008 233,089 98,081 72.6% Total Community Dev Block Grant Fund 0 0 0 135,008 233,089 98,081 73% 145 3117 Proposition A Transit 495,313 243,077 261,701 474,542 474,542 0 0.0% Total Taxes 495,313 243,077 261,701 474,542 474,542 0 0.0% 145 3401 Interest Income 2,813 859 3,904 3,904 11,329 7,425 190.2% 145 3450 Investment Discount 28 13 80 36 181 145 403.3% 145 3475 Investment Premium -1 0 -3 -2 -2 0 21.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 2,840 871 3,981 3,938 11,507 7,569 192.2% 145 3853 Dial-A-Taxi Program 451 -132 389 622 622 0 0.0% 145 3855 Bus Passes 110 0 83 86 86 0 0.0%
Total Current Service Charges 561 -132 472 708 708 0 0.0% 7 1275
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
Total Proposition A Fund 498,714 243,817 266,153 479,188 486,757 7,569 1.6% 146 3118 Proposition C Local Return 410,852 201,629 217,073 393,620 393,260 -360 -0.1% Total Taxes 410,852 201,629 217,073 393,620 393,260 -360 -0.1% 146 3401 Interest Income 12,773 5,191 11,362 12,441 38,845 26,404 212.2% 146 3450 Investment Discount 128 65 234 115 621 506 440.2% 146 3475 Investment Premium -5 0 -8 -8 -8 0 3.8%
Total Use of Money and Property 12,896 5,256 11,589 12,548 39,458 26,910 214.5% Total Proposition C Fund 423,748 206,885 228,662 406,168 432,718 26,550 6.5% 147 3119 Measure R Local Return Funds 308,089 151,236 162,763 295,215 295,215 0 0.0% Total Taxes 308,089 151,236 162,763 295,215 295,215 0 0.0% 147 3401 Interest Income 3,206 1,835 2,708 3,804 7,940 4,136 108.7% 147 3450 Investment Discount 34 24 56 35 127 92 262.8%
147 3475 Investment Premium -1 0 -2 -2 -2 0 -15.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 3,240 1,859 2,762 3,837 8,065 4,228 110.2% 147 3970 Measure R SBCCOG South Bay Highway 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Measure R Fund 311,329 153,095 165,525 299,052 303,280 4,228 1.4% 148 3131 Measure M Local Return Funds 348,638 171,009 184,145 334,577 334,577 0 0.0% Total Taxes 348,638 171,009 184,145 334,577 334,577 0 0.0% 148 3401 Interest Income 4,602 1,629 5,472 3,569 16,588 13,019 364.8% 148 3450 Investment Discount 44 20 112 33 265 232 703.9% 148 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 -2 -4 -2 77.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 4,646 1,649 5,585 3,600 16,849 13,249 368.0% Total Measure M Fund 353,284 172,658 189,730 338,177 351,426 13,249 3.9% 149 3132 Measure W Local Returns 157,832 0 158,027 157,832 157,832 0 0.0% Total Taxes 157,832 0 158,027 157,832 157,832 0 0.0%
149 3401 Interest Income 901 67 1,568 373 4,458 4,085 1095.2% 149 3450 Investment Discount 8 1 31 3 71 68 2276.7%
149 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 909 68 1,599 376 4,528 4,153 1104.6% Total Measure W Fund 158,741 68 159,627 158,208 162,360 4,152 2.6% 150 3558 Beverage Recycling Grant 5,162 0 0 5,300 5,300 0 0.0% 150 3562 State Homeland Security Grant Program 34,156 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 150 3574 SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant - OWR1 28,442 0 0 72,017 72,017 N/A 150 3585 BSCC Mental Health Training 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
150 3590 SB 2 Zoning Ord Update Grant 36,575 0 0 181,545 181,545 0 0.0% 150 3591 Local Early Action Planning 0 0 0 16,370 16,370 0 0.0% 150 3592 Coastal Conservancy Grant- Lot D 0 0 0 433,650 433,650 0 0.0% 150 3593 CalRecycle grant 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0.0%
8 1276
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
150 3594 State Dept Parks & Rec- Specific Grant (Pier) 0 0 0 2,300,000 2,300,000 0 0.0% Total Intergovernmental/State 104,335 0 0 2,962,865 3,008,882 72,017 2.4% 150 3736 Bulletproof Vest Partnership 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
150 3750 Dept of Justice- Body Worn Cameras 1,445 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 150 3751 DOJ Tobacco Law Enforcement Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 150 3757 CalOES Grant - Tsunami Siren 0 0 0 3,525 3,525 0 0.0% 150 3758 CalOES Grant - Education 0 0 0 187,500 187,500 0 0.0% 150 3759 CalOES Grant - Emergency Generator 0 0 0 87,338 0 -87,338 -100.0% 150 3760 Mobile Crisis Response Team 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 N/A 150 3761 CalOES- Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 0 0 0 0 48,045 48,045 N/A Total Intergovernmental/Federal 1,445 0 0 278,363 1,239,070 -87,338 -31.4% 150 3969 West Basin Grant - Water Filling Stations 2,000 2,000 0 0 2,000 2,000 N/A 150 3971 LA Country Library 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
150 3973 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement PCH&2nd 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 150 3984 Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 150 3985 California Green Business Program 7,500 0 7,500 0 15,000 15,000 N/A 150 3986 Caltrans Adaptation Planning Grant 247,050 64,008 0 214,355 0 -214,355 -100.0% 150 3992 BCHD-Domestic Violence Advocate Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Revenue 256,550 66,008 7,500 214,355 17,000 -197,355 -92.1% Total Grant Fund 362,330 66,008 7,500 3,455,583 4,264,952 835,369 24.2% 152 3401 Interest Income 638 246 635 620 2,065 1,445 233.0% 152 3450 Investment Discount 6 3 13 6 33 27 450.3%
152 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 644 249 647 626 2,097 1,471 235.1% 152 3538 AQMD Emission Control AB2766 24,838 6,391 6,435 25,000 25,000 0 0.0% Total Intergovernmental/State 24,838 6,391 6,435 25,000 25,000 0 0.0% Total Air Quality Mgmt Dist Fund 25,482 6,640 7,082 25,626 27,097 1,471 5.7% 153 3135 C.O.P.S. Allocation 126,608 99,615 110,063 127,424 127,424 0 0.0% Total Taxes 126,608 99,615 110,063 127,424 127,424 0 0.0% 153 3401 Interest Income 3,159 1,272 2,794 3,126 9,482 6,356 203.3% 153 3450 Investment Discount 31 16 59 29 152 123 422.9% 153 3475 Investment Premium -1 0 -2 -2 -2 0 1.5%
Total Use of Money and Property 3,189 1,288 2,851 3,153 9,632 6,479 205.5% Total Supp Law Enf Serv Fund 129,797 100,903 112,914 130,577 137,056 6,479 5.0% 158 3755 CARES Act/Coronavirus Relief Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 158 3756 Unemployment Reimbursement 2,443 2,443 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Intergovernmental/Federal 2,443 2,443 0 0 0 0 N/A Total CARES Act Fund 2,443 2,443 0 0 0 0 N/A
9 1277
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
159 3761 American Rescue Plan Act Allocation 4,621,754 2,310,877 0 2,310,877 0 -2,310,877 -100.0% Total Intergovernmental/Federal 4,621,754 2,310,877 0 2,310,877 0 -2,310,877 -100.0% Total American Rescue Plan Act Fund 4,621,754 2,310,877 0 2,310,877 0 -2,310,877 -100.0% 160 3401 Interest Income 25,640 10,057 19,983 26,521 73,856 47,335 178.5% 160 3450 Investment Discount 254 126 422 245 1,181 936 382.1% 160 3475 Investment Premium -9 0 -14 -17 -16 1 -7.2%
Total Use of Money and Property 25,884 10,183 20,390 26,749 75,022 48,273 180.5% 160 3550 CA Waste Oil Recycling Grant 5,455 5,455 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Intergovernmental/State 5,455 5,455 0 0 0 0 N/A
160 3602 Beach Outlet Maintenance 8,294 0 0 8,000 8,000 0 0.0% Total Intergovernmental/County 8,294 0 0 8,000 8,000 0 0.0% 160 3828 Sewer Connection Fee 3,612 3,612 4,077 24,000 8,200 -15,800 -65.8% 160 3829 Sewer Demolition Fee 3,477 945 1,974 2,300 2,300 0 0.0% 160 3832 Sewer Lateral Installation 20,266 10,250 10,887 18,000 18,000 0 0.0% Total Current Service Charges 27,355 14,807 16,938 44,300 28,500 -15,800 -35.7% 160 6861 Sewer Service Charge/Oversized Vehicle Per 1,090,628 445,597 480,732 1,102,000 1,081,905 -20,095 N/A Total Current Service Charges (Continued) 1,090,628 445,597 480,732 1,102,000 1,081,905 -20,095 -1.8% Total Sewer Fund 1,157,617 476,042 518,060 1,181,049 1,193,427 12,378 1.0% 161 3401 Interest Income 17,879 8,925 18,371 18,342 55,473 37,131 202.4% 161 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 0 170 887 717 421.9%
161 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 -12 -12 0 -1.3%
Total Use of Money and Property 17,879 8,925 18,371 18,512 56,348 37,848 204.5% Total Storm Drain Fund 17,879 8,925 18,371 18,500 56,348 37,848 204.6% 170 3307 Department of Justice Forfeited Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 170 3308 Department of Treasury Forfeited Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Fines and Forfeitures 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
170 3401 Interest Income 5,100 2,129 4,136 5,366 14,752 9,386 174.9% 170 3450 Investment Discount 52 27 86 50 236 186 371.9% 170 3475 Investment Premium -2 0 -3 -3 -3 0 5.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 5,150 2,156 4,219 5,413 14,985 9,572 176.8% Total Asset Seizure/Forft Fund 5,150 2,156 4,219 5,413 14,985 9,572 176.8% 180 3401 Interest Income 60 53 0 0 0 0 N/A
180 3450 Investment Discount 1 1 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 61 54 0 0 0 0 N/A
180 3912 Fire Flow Fee 8,457 5,169 4,897 34,814 9,800 -25,014 -71.9% Total Other Revenue 8,457 5,169 4,897 34,814 9,800 -25,014 -71.9% Total Fire Protection Fund 8,519 5,223 4,897 34,814 9,800 -25,014 -71.9% 10 1278
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
190 3401 Interest Income 6,457 2,760 5,632 6,940 19,270 12,330 177.7% 190 3426 Easement Cable 1-2nd Street 90,000 45,000 45,000 90,000 90,000 0 0.0% 190 3427 Cell Site License-Sprint/Easement Cable 2-Lo 61,200 25,200 36,000 72,000 72,000 0 N/A 190 3428 Cell Site License - Verizon/Easement Cable 3 0 0 255,547 17,250 255,547 238,297 N/A 190 3433 Easement Cable 4-25th St 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
190 3450 Investment Discount 66 35 116 64 308 244 381.5% 190 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 -4 -4 0 3.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 157,723 72,996 342,295 186,250 437,121 250,871 134.7% Total RTI Undersea Cable Fund 157,723 72,996 342,295 186,250 437,121 250,871 134.7% 191 3401 Interest Income 3,490 1,512 3,622 3,806 10,480 6,674 175.4% 191 3426 Easement Cable 1-2nd Street 0 0 184,000 184,000 184,000 0 0.0% 191 3450 Investment Discount 36 19 85 35 168 133 378.9% 191 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 -2 -2 0 12.0%
Total Use of Money and Property 3,526 1,531 187,707 187,839 194,645 6,806 3.6% Total RTI Tidelands Fund 3,526 1,531 187,707 187,839 194,645 6,806 3.6% 301 3401 Interest Income 74,685 29,185 67,023 74,403 229,671 155,268 208.7% 301 3450 Investment Discount 740 363 1,359 688 3,673 2,985 433.9% 301 3475 Investment Premium -27 0 -46 -47 -49 -2 4.4%
Total Use of Money and Property 75,398 29,548 68,336 75,044 233,295 158,251 210.9% 301 3913 In-Lieu Fee/Street Pavement 2,544 2,544 5,422 0 10,000 10,000 N/A Total Other Revenue 2,544 2,544 5,422 0 10,000 10,000 N/A Total Capital Improvement Fund 77,942 32,093 73,758 75,044 243,295 168,251 224.2% 313 3940 Cash Payments/Utility Undergrounding 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Greenwich Village N Utility Undergrounding Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 609 3401 Interest Income 734 251 440 783 1,960 1,177 150.4% 609 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 0 7 31 24 347.9%
609 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 734 251 440 790 1,991 1,202 152.1% Total Bayview Dr Redemption Fund 734 251 440 790 1,991 1,201 152.1% 610 3401 Interest Income 25 11 21 27 74 47 172.9%
610 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 0 0 1 1 N/A
610 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 26 11 21 27 75 48 177.3% Total Lower Pier Dist Redemption Fund 26 11 21 27 75 48 177.2% 611 3401 Interest Income 307 101 165 334 796 462 138.4% 611 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 0 3 13 10 324.3%
611 3475 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 307 101 165 337 809 472 140.1% 11 1279
Revenue Detail Report
Mid Year 2022-23
Funds
Account
Code Account Name 2021-22 Actual
2021-22 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 YTD
Thru Dec
2022-23 Revised
Budget
2022-23 Mid Year
Estimate
Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
over 2022-
23 Revised
Budget
Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Redemption Fund 307 101 165 337 809 472 140.0% 612 3401 Interest Income 37 16 30 39 108 69 177.5%
612 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 1 0 2 2 N/A
612 3745 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 38 16 31 39 110 71 181.9% Total Beach Dr Assessment Dist Reserve Fund 37.7 15.7 31.1 39.0 109.9 70.9 181.9% 617 3401 Interest Income 408 210 381 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 408 210 381 0 0 0 N/A
Total Mrytle Ave Assessment Fund 408 210 381 0 0 0 N/A
618 3401 Interest Income 77 0 -77 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 77 0 -77 0 0 0 N/A
Total Loma Drive Assessment Fund 77 0 -77 0 0 0 N/A
619 3401 Interest Income 123 51 100 128 355 227 177.3%
619 3450 Investment Discount 0 0 0 1 6 5 468.0%
619 3745 Investment Premium 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Use of Money and Property 123 51 100 129 361 232 179.6% Total Bayview Dr Reserve Fund 123 51 100 129 361 232 179.5% 705 3880 Insurance Service Charges/Tobacco Retailer 2,911,245 1,462,152 1,557,078 3,114,147 3,114,147 0 0.0% Total Current Service Charges 2,911,245 1,462,152 1,557,078 3,114,147 3,114,147 0 0.0% 705 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 29,809 29,809 11,038 0 11,038 11,038 N/A 705 3904 General Miscellaneous 550 0 1,194 0 1,194 1,194 N/A Total Other Revenue 30,359 29,809 12,233 0 12,232 12,232 N/A Total Insurance Fund 2,941,604 1,491,961 1,569,311 3,114,147 3,126,379 12,232 0.4% 715 3822 Building Maintenance Service Charges 101,556 50,778 50,772 101,556 101,556 0 0.0% 715 3885 Comm Equip/Business Mach Charges 1,053,480 526,746 465,708 931,422 931,422 0 0.0% 715 3889 Vehicle/Equip Replacement Charges 899,264 468,708 480,576 921,518 921,518 0 0.0% Total Current Service Charges 2,054,300 1,046,232 997,056 1,954,496 1,954,496 0 0.0% 715 3901 Sale of Real/Personal Property 33,299 10,534 7,285 0 17,435 17,435 N/A 715 3902 Refunds/Reimb Previous Years 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
715 3904 General Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
715 3962 Election/SCE Reimbursement 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
Total Other Revenue 33,299 10,534 7,285 0 17,435 17,435 N/A 715 6866 Records Technology Fee 99,047 58,561 50,527 80,914 101,054 20,140 24.9% Total Current Service Charges (Continued) 99,047 58,561 50,527 80,914 101,054 20,140 24.9% Total Equipment Replacement Fund 2,186,646 1,115,327 1,054,868 2,035,410 2,072,985 37,575 1.8% Grand Total 61,969,000 25,693,582 25,038,723 63,110,140 64,537,973 1,453,833 2.3% 12 1280
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
General Fund
City Clerk 001-1121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,000
In January 2023, O'Brien Bender Consulting began work at the Records Center.

She is working from a location in the Community Center and will be providing organizing services to rebox, analyze, and inventory all records. Her contract amount is expected to exceed the threshold approved by the City Manager through the end of the fiscal year. Adding an additional $10,000 amount to her contract will enable her to continue working on the Records Center Project.

New Positions or Position Reclassifications:

City Clerk 001-1121-4112 Part Time/Temporary 20,000
In January 2023, City Clerk's office third-party expert began working on reboxing, itemizing, and inventorying the records in the Records Center. She is working out of the Community Center and will require additional support. A temporary intern will assist our professional organizer with managing the master indexing of all records and verifying the status of scanned and returned boxes from a thirdparty vendor. Recommend adding one temporary part-time City Clerk intern.

Police 001-2101-4102 Regular Salaries 1,215
The Police Department request to adjust staffing by eliminating the position of Administrative Assistant and creating a new position, Assistant to the Chief of Police. Based on the research, the Assistant to the Chief of Police is a specific classification within the City or the position is classified as an Executive Assistant, not as Administrative Assistant. The recommended classification of Assistant to the Chief of Police does not currently exist and would need to be presented to the Civil Service Commission for authorization. In order to provide a classification that will attract qualified candidates and provide a competitive salary, it is recommended that the salary for the Assistant to the Chief of Police be established at 5% above the salary range for the Administrative Assistant position within the City of Hermosa Beach. The position reclassification would cost $4,858 annually. Requesting an additional $1,215 for April-June 2023.

Contact Amendments:
1 Attachment 2
1281
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Community
Dev/Planning
001-4101-4102 and 001-4201-
4102 Regular Salaries 3,983
The Community Development Department is requesting to reclassify the Office Assistant position to a second permanent Building and Planning Technician to perform varied clerical and administrative functions relating to the issuance of building permit applications and zone checks and to do related work as required.

Duties may include, but are not limited to the following: Assisting in the processing of building permit applications; assisting in responding to information requests at the public counter; providing general zoning, building and related code information to permit applicants and the general public; receives and responds to inquiries at the public counter and on the telephone; reviews permit applications for completeness; issues permits for work to be performed; coordinates plan distribution, processing, and permit issuance within and outside the department; calculates fees; maintains and updates computer data base for building and development permits and computer tracking of project case work; maintains related records, logs, and files; and assists other office staff in answering the department telephone and performing miscellaneous clerical work. The cost of the reclassification is $15,931. Requesting to cover the increase for April- June 2023. Salary will be split between the Building and Planning Division
Other Department Requests:

City Council 001-1101-4305 Office Operating Supplies 8,000 Increase office operating supplies budget due to return to in-person meetings and election year: Additional funds needed for Council meeting dinners, presentations, photos, and office supplies.

City Council 001-1101-4317 Conference/Training 8,000
Increase City Council conference and training budget due to increased in-person conferences and due to election year with two outgoing Councilmembers also attending conferences prior to the City Council transition on December 12, 2022.

City Clerk 001-1121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,375
Recommendation to approve a recurring cost of about $3,375 for a DocuSign commercial account. The City Clerk's office has a Business Pro account with DocuSign. The upgrade to a commercial account will accommodate unlimited users.

City Clerk 001-1121-4201 Contract Serv/Private 3,405
The Clerk's office is requesting funding to have File Keepers integrate our DocuSign account into Laserfiche and to create a workflow for contract processing that will begin and end in Laserfiche. This will create efficiencies and ensure that the process is streamlined. The City has Laserfiche licensing through File Keepers and Laserfiche is the City's permanent repository system.

Recommendation to approve $1,405 for the DocuSign integration and $2,000 for the contract processing workflow in Laserfiche for a total of $3,405. 2 1282
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
City Manager 001-1201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 12,180 Staff recommends adding $12,180 for FY 2022-23 to cover the balance due to Granicus for completion of the web design re-branding project on January 20, 2023 and for the Communications Cloud Package (service from 12/15/21 - 12/14/22) which was originally budgeted in FY 2021-22.

City Manager 001-1201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 15,000 Staff recommends increasing contract services by $15,000 for Print Communications/Promotions/Public Outreach (Special Event Banners, Ads, Mailers).In its 2022-23 budget, the City Manager's Office budgeted $10,000 under its printing communications line item. However, the City Manager's Office had multiple unanticipated printing expenses, including election-related mailers and cost-sharing with the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce on printed materials. Due to these expenses, the City Manager's Office has spent $17,645.88 on printing communications to date and it expects to spend an additional $7,400 through the end of the fiscal year.

City Manager 001-1201-4305 Office Operating Supplies 2,500 The City Manager's Office currently has nine full-time staff members with a possibility of adding an additional part-time temporary intern. Additional Office Operating funds are needed due to additional staff members.

City Manager 001-1201-4315 Membership 250
Purchase subscription to California Planning & Development Report (CP&DR), the leading news source on California planning and development issues. They track the development of state law as it pertains to environmental policy, housing development, and transportation planning. CP&DR also provides indepth coverage of planning-related news of interest in cities across California.

Finance Admin 001-1202-4112 Part-time/temporary 60,000
Request for $60,000 to cover part-time staff used to fill vacancies, assist with duties while new hires are trained, and assist with the training of new hires.

Human Resources 001-1203-4191 Signing Bonus 100,166
In order to provide the City with an additional tool to help attract and retain qualified employees, the City Manager approved a Sign-On Bonus Program to support the recruitment efforts of specific vacant positions. Staff is recommending approval of an additional $48,500 to cover the sign-on bonuses for non-Police Department staff estimated to be paid through the remaining of the 2022-2023 FY. Staff is also recommending approval of an additional $51,666 to cover the sign-on bonuses for police department staff to be paid through the remaining of the 2022-2023 FY. The total amount requested is $100,166. 3 1283
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Human Resources 001-1203-4201 Contract Services/Private 3,221 Request to fund the Flexible Spending Arrangement (FSA) account deposit. The City offered optional FSA enrollment to employees for the 2023 benefit year. In order to offer the employee funded health care and dependent care reimbursement accounts, the City is required to prefund the accounts by paying a deposit of equivalent to one month's contributions to cover any initial reimbursements.

Police 001-2101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 9,142
CPS HR Consulting was hired to conduct a Sergeant position assessment as a result of the Police Department having two promotions available this fiscal year.

They conducted research to create a promotion plan, which consisted of developing questions and scenarios to ask during the process. They also looked into the department's policies and procedures to guide their plan of action.

These services were not accounted for in the 2022-23 Budget.

Police 001-2101-4314 Uniforms 8,000
Staff is requesting an increase to the uniforms budget to reflect the number of recruits hired in 2022-23.

Police 001-2101-4329 Recruitment/Hiring 2,500
The Police Department requests a separate recruitment and hiring budget to cover the efforts to seek and hire candidate. The Professional Standards Unit (PSU) would use the Recruitment/Hiring account for introductory/informational meetings with potential candidates for available positions, required materials and services needed upfront for the hiring process, and emergency requests for new hires. The PSU invests a lot of time in finding the right candidates for the positions and seeing if they match the Department’s values and goals. When it comes to the hiring process, most recruits are required to have a set of equipment and reading materials, which would charged to the new account.

Public works 001-3301-4201 Contract Services/Private 111,305 Installation of new decorative lighting on the downtown palm trees along Pier and Hermosa Avenues. Funding will come from the $100,000 upfront payment from the new Athens contract amendment.

Community Services 001-3302-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 1,000 The Community Service's Base 3 building does not have any central air conditioning unit and it gets hot during the summer. Staff recommends the addition of tint to the windows that face the sun the most to reduce the temperature inside the building.

Community
Dev/Planning and
Building 001-4101-4305 Office Operating Supplies 2,128
Staff requests an additional $1,100 for dinner expenses to provide food to the Planning Staff before Planning Commission meetings and an additional $1,028 to cover supplies and furnishings for the front office and Director's office. 4 1284
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Community
Dev/Planning 001-4101-4314 Uniforms 796
The Community Development department purchased new Code Enforcement uniforms for two Officers including embroidery with the new Hermosa logo. Cost of uniforms increased due to inflation. Requesting to add $596.32 + $200 for additional uniform purchasing as needed.

Community
Dev/Planning 001-4101-4317 Conference/Training 1,426
The Community Development Director requests an additional $1,426 in funding for training for four Planners.

Community
Dev/Planning 001-4101-4394 Building Maintenance Charges 2,000 Request for $2,000 to replace Blinds in the Planners' Offices, Front Office, and Director's Office.

Community Dev/Building 001-4201-4187 Uniform Allowance 260 Request to include work boots funding, which was approved in the MOU.

Community Dev/Building 001-4201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,000 Community Development would like to enlist the services of Matrix Imaging Products, Inc. for an annual amount of $5,000 to assist with scanning file boxes of paper records into an electronic content. Scanning of the Community Development's paper records into a centralized electronic repository will improve document search and retrieval times, free up the office and storage space occupied by file boxes and allow for recycling and disposal of unneeded records as permissible by the Hermosa Beach records retention policy. This would include large-file format document scanning, such as plans and maps, permit applications, and other documents that are required to be retained.

Benefits of using Matrix Imaging Products, Inc. include improved business continuity and disaster recovery in case of damage or loss to paper files, along with the ability to convert paper processes such as event permit applications to online storage.

Community Dev/Building 001-4201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50,000 The Community Development Department requests to retain the services of two professional firms or individuals with the expertise and capacity to review a variety of plans, reports, parcel maps, vesting tentative maps, land development and disciplines plan checks, commercial and residential plans and coordinate Civil review sheets with the Engineering Department. The requested amount is $200,000 a year ($100,000 per consultant annually). It is anticipated that the services would start April 2023, therefore an additional $50,000 for April-June.

Community Dev/Building 001-4201-4305 Office Operating Supplies 1,000 Staff requests an increase of $1,000 to cover the addition of the new Director's cell phone and service for two iPads for the Code Enforcement Officials.

Community Dev/Building 001-4201-4317 Conference/Training 1,720 Request additional $1,720 for additional training for Staff . 5 1285
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Building Maintenance 001-4204-4505 Equipment > $5,000 26,334 Request for upgrades to the City Council Chambers audio-visual (AV) equipment.

The main AV system encoder (Vaddio) seems to be failing. It has been sent back to the manufacturer once for repairs and reinstalled. Western AV is suggesting upgrading to a Blackmagic broadcast system including a new camera controller. This will replace the current Vaddio production switcher and camera controller. Equipment would be purchased using Public Education and Government Access (PEG) grant funding.

Building Maintenance Use of Restricted PEG Funds Restricted Fund Balance -26,334 Use Public Education and Government Access (PEG) grant funding in the General Fund's restricted fund balance to purchase new audio-visual equipment listed above.

Community Resources 001-4601-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,200 Increase requested for Community Resources contract services account to cover increased cost of Community Center Gymnasium annual floor refinishing, which came in overbudget, and excursions.

Parks 001-6101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50,000
Staff recommends appropriating $50,000 for installation of netting on the north side of Clark Field. The existing baseball in the northwest corner of Clark Field does not have a net along the northerly fall ball line. There is long history of baseballs going over the fences of Clark field and damaging surrounding homes and now the new City Park restroom which has solar panels on the roof.

Parks 001-6101-4201 Contract Serv/Private 71,876
Increase the Parks Maintenance service by $71,876. The original estimate for Parks Maintenance contract services was lower than the actual required following bidder selection.

Parks 001-6101-4309 Maintenance Materials 10,000
Maintenance costs have been higher than anticipated this fiscal year and additional funds are needed for the remaining fiscal year. Staff recommends appropriating an additional $10,000 to cover the cost for the remaining fiscal year.

Total General Fund Requests 585,648
Lighting/Landscaping Fund
Lighting/Landscaping/M
edians 105-2601-4309 Maintenance Materials 10,000
Increased maintenance costs have occurred this fiscal year and additional funds are needed for the remaining fiscal year. Staff recommends appropriating an additional $10,000 to cover the cost for the remaining fiscal year.

Total Lighting/Landscaping Fund Requests 10,000
6 1286
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Gas Tax Fund
193 Pedestrian Crossing
Safety Imp 115-8193-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,000
The City has $10,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds that need to be used by June 30, 2023. TDA funds can be used to towards purchasing Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) as part of CIP 193, which includes installation of several RRFBs throughout the City.

Total Gas Fund Requests 10,000
CDBG Fund
606 Longfellow Sidewalk
Improvements 140-8606-4201 Contract Serv/Private 98,081 New CIP to use $98,081 of grant funds through LA County's Community Development Block grant (CDBG) program which is be used on sidewalk improvement along Longfellow Ave as approved by City Council.

Total CDBG Fund Requests 98,081
Proposition A Fund
Commuter Xpress 145-3408-4251 Contract Services/Govt 19,606 City of Los Angeles route 438 share of costs was $52,891.60 for prior year. Staff recommends increasing the Commuter Express Budget by $19,606 to match prior year costs.

Total Proposition A Fund Requests 19,606
Grant Fund
City Manager 150-1201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 48,045 Receive the grant from CalOES to update the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP)
7 1287
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
City Manager 150-1201-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,000,000 Mobile Mental Health Pilot Project - Federal Grant. The City of Hermosa Beach will receive $1 million in federal funding to launch a mobile crisis response pilot program to provide help to people experiencing homelessness and mental health crises.

U.S. Rep. Ted Lieu secured the funding at the request of the City of Hermosa Beach to develop and provide an alternate response model for mental health and behavior-related calls involving people experiencing homelessness in Hermosa. Currently, the Hermosa Beach Police Department is often the agency responding to calls involving unhoused residents who have mental health issues.

The City will use the federal funding to engage and support a civilian team that will respond instead of the police when the calls involve non-emergency and nonmedical situations with individuals experiencing homelessness and in need of mental health services.

The mobile crisis response team will be trained and equipped to de-escalate situations and work in cooperation with Harbor Interfaith Services, which provides services for Hermosa’s unhoused residents. The mobile crisis response team will be able to provide information, referrals, transportation to services and additional follow-up support and case management to support Harbor Interfaith Services.

Zoning Ordinance
Update 150-4105-4201 Contract Serv/Private 72,017 Increase grant for $72,017 that was not reappropriated from FY 2021-22 in error.

Total Grant Fund Requests 1,120,062
Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund
Special Investigations 170-2103-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 56,933 Purchase of Automatic License Plate Readers. On April 26, 2022, City Council approved the Hermosa Beach Police Department to move forward in purchasing Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPR). Funds from 170-2103-5403 for a total amount of $56,932.50 were not reappropriated into FY2022-23. These funds were needed to cover the purchase of the ALPRs.

Total Asset Seizure/Forfeiture Fund Requests 56,933
8 1288
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Capital Improvement Fund
607 Record Center
Renovation 301-8607-4201 Contract Serv/Private 160,000
Design Costs of Records Center. The area in the Community Center that was formerly a shower and locker room is being used as a storage center for all City records for retention and processing. The area is not designed or set up to be a proper Records Center for the City and should be brought up to current health and building standards if there are plans to continue housing City records there.

Having a proper Records Center will allow City Clerk staff to process destruction requests in a timely manner, and for departments to submit Records Transfer Requests to the City Clerk's office for storage in the Records Center using proper archiving methodologies. Creating and maintaining a proper archiving methodology will allow departments to request records in the Clerk's custody and receive them in a timely manner. This should cut the amount of time that staff spends searching for records in response to Public Records Requests. In addition, maintaining a proper Records Center will allow departments to free up space in their working areas of records.

CIP 610 Fort Lots-O-Fun
Wall and Gate Imp 301-8610-4201 Contract Serv/Private 100,000 The concrete retaining wall and wooden gate at Fort Lots-O-Fun are in need of substantial, urgent repair.

Total Capital Improvement Fund Requests 260,000
Insurance Fund
City Attorney- Litigation 705-1133-4201 Contract Serv/Private 50,000 Staff recommends a budget increase of $50,000 for City Attorney Litigation due to anticipated Initiation of Litigation.

Liability Insurance 705-1209-4201 Contract Serv/Private 222,702 ICRMA Liability Insurance fund premium was underbudgeted. The cost allocation process uses a 70/30 weighting of claims experience and payroll. Both of these formula components increased this past year due to an increase in our claims loss experience and an increase in payroll, which increased by 12% from the previous year.

Auto/Property/ Bonds 705-1210-4201 Contract Serv/Private 6,356 ICRMA Auto/Property/Bonds Insurance fund was also underbudgeted. The cost allocation process uses a 70/30 weighting of claims experience and payroll.

Both of these formula components increased this past year due to an increase in our claims loss experience and an increase in payroll, which increased by 12% from the previous year.

Total Insurance Fund Requests 279,058
9 1289
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Equipment Replacement Fund
Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 240 Canva - Annual Subscription. The City uses Canva to create public information graphics that align with the City’s style guide and logo use guidelines. The seven seats are assigned to staff in the City Manager’s Office, Community Recreation, and Public Works who are responsible for creating flyers, graphics, and other materials.

Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 708 Loomly - Annual Subscription. The City uses Loomly, an online service, to schedule content posts across four social media channels (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram). Loomly can also be used to schedule content to TikTok. The City has six users and is currently paying $79 per month on a recurring PO. Staff is requesting $708 up front to switch to yearly pricing and save 25 percent.

Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 1,200 Purchase AirTable annual subscription. Airtable is a no-code relational database with public facing interfaces and the ability to automate workflows. City staff are exploring the use of Airtable to create tools such as a contract tracker, a general plan tracker, an analyst team project tracker, and an IT /hardware tracker. Currently we have four collaborators under Airtable’s Pro plan at a cost of at $24 a month (total $1152). We are requesting five seats and paying upfront ($20 / person / month = $1,200).

Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 2,000 Bluebeam Licenses - Annual Subscription. This will be an ongoing expense.

As part of ongoing process improvements, Community Development is moving to electronic plan checking. Bluebeam is a program specifically designed for handling large scale graphic documents such as plans and has electronic plan checking and other field specific functionalities built into it, making Bluebeam a better tool for planners and engineers than Adobe Acrobat. Public Works has been using this program successfully since 2020 for numerous tasks including plan checks.

Community Development has requested 5 licenses for their staff (planners and building official) to use this program. Bluebeam recently transition to a subscription based purchasing model so this would be an ongoing service. 10 1290
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 5,720 The City has been using Zoom to facilitate hybrid City Council and Commission meetings, as well as hold all-staff meetings, department meetings, interviews for recruitment, and meetings with outside entities and individuals. As this service was brought on as a direct response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the annual Zoom fees were charged to FEMA reimbursement accounts. With the end of pandemic related emergency declarations and grant programs, this service needs to be charged to a regular contract services account.

Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,000 RFP Development/Service Review. Due to substantially increased costs in the IT managed services contract as well as a decline in service, staff is looking to put the IT managed services contract out to RFP before the end of the fiscal year. For the previous RFP process for this service, a consultant was brought on board to review current services, help develop the RFP and review submissions. The staff involved with the previous process found it extremely beneficial to have a subject matter expert provide to contribute to the process.

This request is to engage in similar services for the upcoming process.

Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 15,000 $15,000 adjustment to "Microsoft Enterprise Agreement and Additional Licenses" to bring the total to $50,000. Additional licenses are needed accommodate new positions that were added this fiscal year. Most of these positions require the highest level of licenses (G3) because these staff need access to the full suite of Microsoft products to complete their everyday work.

Also, some staff were previously accessing Microsoft Office programs that were licensed to the computer, as opposed to the user. Like most software companies, Microsoft has moved to a named user licensing model and these computer licenses are no longer available.

Requesting an additional $15,000 to bring the total amount budgeted for this item to $50,000.
11 1291
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Information Technology 715-1206-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,453 Add $10,452.86 to cover outstanding invoice to Granicus for Web Hosting Services from 12/15/21 - 12/14/22. The City previously had an agreement with Vision Technology Solutions LLC (Vision) for Web Hosting Services. On 2/9/2018, Vision was acquired by Granicus. A consent to assumption agreement was signed with Granicus on 9/24/2020 to continue the City's Web Hosting Services.

This ongoing service was budgeted in FY 2021-22 for $10,468 under the Information Technology Account 715-1206-4201. The amount due of $10,452.86 for Web Hosting Services from 12/15/21 - 12/14/22 was included on the same invoice as the Granicus E-Notification System Upgrade (City Manager Account 001-1201-4201) which caused confusion and the amount was not paid.

Information Technology 715-1206-4305 Office Operating Supplies 1,500 Additional $1500 for regular Office Operating Supplies expenditures for remainder of the fiscal year. There have been more requests for printer ink and other miscellaneous office supplies (webcams, monitor adaptors, Wi-Fi adaptors, etc.), than were anticipated when requesting funds for the Office Operating Supplies account this budget cycle. There is less than $900 available in account currently to cover the rest of the fiscal year.

Information Technology 715-1206-5401 Equip-Less Than $1,000 13,000 Computer Replacement Catch Up- $10,800 to replace additional computers with the replacement schedule and $2,200 to cover increases in computer costs of already budgeted replacements.

Information Technology 715-1206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 1,100 The incoming Community Development Director has requested a laptop to use while working out of the office and the City Manager has approved this request.

Information Technology 715-1206-5402 Equip-More Than $1,000 6,600 Computers for Crime Analyst / Associate Engineer / GIS IT Analyst. The positions of Associate Engineer, Crime Analyst and GIS / IT Analyst are assigned duties that involve processing large amounts of data and extensive rendering of graphics.

Providing these positions with computers that have more RAM and dedicated graphics processor will provide the technical support these positions need to efficiently complete their work.
12 1292
2022-23 Midyear Budget Review
Additional Appropriations Report
Functions Name Account String Account Name 2022-23 Mid
Year Estimate Description
Information Technology 715-1206-5405 Equipment more than $5,000 10,000 Wireless Bridge Upgrade - City Yard. The City Yard's internet is provided through a wireless antenna on the roof of City Hall. This antenna is also providing internet to the Community Center and Base 3 by pointing in the general direction of all 3 sites. The antenna has 90 degree field of view, but the receivers on the Community Center and the City Yard are 112 degrees apart, meaning one of these locations is not receiving the full signal from City Hall. Additionally, this system was installed pre-pandemic, before there was a need for the Yard to use bandwidth intensive services such as video meetings. When 2+ people at the City Yard join a video call, it is highly likely the internet will go down because their existing service is overwhelmed by the bandwidth being pulled.

Upgrading the antenna at the City Yard and adding an antenna to the City Hall roof that is dedicated to broadcast to City Yard will improve the connection at that site.

Community Services 715-3302-5403 Vehicles 104,354
Ford Electric F150 and the Ford Cargo Van. Vehicles were approved for purchase in 2021-22, but funds were inadvertently not reappropriated. In addition, vehicle prices have gone up so the prices of the two vehicles have increased since last assessed.

Building Maintenance 715-4204-4201 Contract Serv/Private 10,000 Additional $10,000 is needed for Unspecified Building Maintenance & Repairs contract service account due to unexpected repairs and higher than expected costs.

Total Insurance Fund Requests 191,875
13 1293

BUDGET TRANSFERS
2022-23 MIDYEAR BUDGET

FUND / DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT
GENERAL FUND:

From Lighting/Landscaping Fund , Administration $11,054 From State Gas Tax Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $357,865 From Prop A Open Space Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation $44,963 From Beach Drive Assessment District Administrative Expense Fund, Agency Administration $2,500
From Bayview Drive Administrative Expense Fund, Agency Administration $3,000 From American Rescue Plan Act Fund,For Public Safety Costs $1,313,107 To Insurance Fund, 2020-21 Unspent Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal $278,031
To Insurance Fund, 2022-23 Midyear Unspent Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal (Midyear) $876,654
To Equipment Replacement Fund, 2020-21 Unspent Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal $333,645
To Equipment Replacement Fund, 2022-23 Midyear Unspent Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal (Midyear) $645,035
CIPs $2,602,107
(Midyear) $2,012,273
To Lease Revenue Bond Fund, Bond Payment $685,860
To Storm Drain Fund, From Utility User Tax $700,000
GENERAL FUND TOTALS $1,732,489 $8,133,605
LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND:

To General Fund, Administration $11,054
From Tyco Fund, Cover Deficit $1,590
From RTI Fund, Cover Deficit $239,245
LIGHTING/LANDSCAPING FUND TOTALS $240,835 $11,054
STATE GAS TAX FUND:

To General Fund, Street Maintenance, Traffic Safety Operations $357,865 STATE GAS TAX FUND TOTALS $0 $357,865
RTI FUND:

To Lighting/Landscaping Fund, Cover Deficit $239,245
RTI FUND TOTALS $0 $239,245
PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND:

To General Fund, Parks Maintenance Allocation $44,963
PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND TOTALS $0 $44,963
TYCO Fund
To Fire Protection Fund, Cover Deficit (Midyear) $19,500 To Lighting/Landscaping Fund, Cover Deficit $1,590
PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND TOTALS $0 $21,090
1 Attachment 31294

BUDGET TRANSFERS
2022-23 MIDYEAR BUDGET

FUND / DESCRIPTION TRANSFERS IN TRANSFERS OUT
BAYVIEW DRIVE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND:

To General Fund, Agency Administration $3,000
BAYVIEW DRIVE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND TOTALS $0 $3,000 BEACH DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND:

To General Fund, Agency Administration $2,500
E ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUND TOTALS $0 $2,500 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUND:

To General Fund, For Public Safety Costs $1,313,107
AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUND TOTALS $0 $1,313,107
STORM DRAIN FUND:

From General Fund, From Utility User Tax $700,000
STORM DRAIN FUND TOTALS $700,000 $0
FIRE PROTECTION FUND:

From Tyco Fund, Cover Deficit (Midyear) $19,500 $0
PROP A OPEN SPACE FUND TOTALS $19,500 $0
LEASE REVENUE BOND FUND:

From General Fund, For Bond Payments $685,860
LEASE REVENUE BOND FUND TOTALS $685,860 $0

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
From General Fund, 2020-21 Unspent Funds Funds for Future CIPs (Midyear) $2,012,273
From General Fund, 2020-21 Unspent Funds Funds for New and Future CIPs $2,602,107
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TOTALS $4,614,380 $0

INSURANCE FUND
From General Fund, 2022-23 Midyear Unspent Funds Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal (Midyear) $876,654
From General Fund, 2020-21 Unspent Funds Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal $278,031
INSURANCE FUND TOTALS $1,154,685 $0

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
From General Fund, 2022-23 Midyear Unspent Funds Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal (Midyear) $645,035
From General Fund, 2020-21 Unspent Funds Funds to Bring Balance to Funding Goal $333,645
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND TOTALS $978,680 $0
GRAND TOTALS $10,126,429 $10,126,429
2 1295
Major Fund

LIGHTING

GENERAL LANDSCAPING STATE GAS

FUND FUND TAX FUND
001 105 115

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $36,325,657 $457,549 $0
Licenses/Permits $1,504,280 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $1,740,260 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $1,181,616 $2,840 $16,509
Intergovernmental/State $155,781 $0 $1,013,388
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $7,455,785 $0 $0
Other Revenue $258,113 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $48,621,492 $460,389 $1,029,897 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $1,732,489 $240,835 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $50,353,981 $701,224 $1,029,897

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $20,424,949 $137,828 $804,068
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $70,778,930 $839,052 $1,833,965

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $47,429,897 $815,348 $50,000
Capital Outlay $121,020 $0 $0
Capital Improvements $40,411 $0 1,385,000
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $47,591,328 $815,348 $1,435,000
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $8,133,605 $11,054 $357,865
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $55,724,933 $826,402 $1,792,865

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $15,053,997 (a) $12,650 $41,100 (a) CLASSIFICATIONS OF FUND BALANCE:

Restricted Previous Balance Current Balance
General Plan Maintenance Fee $242,483 $0
PEG Grants $113,106 $145,593
CASP Fees $48,526 $58,240
Marquee Donation $50,000 $50,000
Committed
In Lieu Fee/ Parking Facility $404,600 $462,400
Assigned
Contingencies $7,307,026 $7,588,784
Unspecified Contingencies $730,696 $0
20-21 Year End Balance $2,602,107 $318,460
21-22 Year End Balance $0 $3,835,617
Retirement Rate Stabilization $1,021,575 $1,021,575
Retirement Trust $829,060 $829,060
Compensated Absences $286,312 $294,170
Prop A Fund Exchange- Engineer Funding $190,321 $190,321 $259,777 $259,777
CIP Carry Forward $40,411 $0
$14,126,000 $15,053,997
Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $0 $12,650 $41,100

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
21-22 Prop A Fund Exchange- Engineer
Special Revenue Funds
1 Attachment 4
1296
PROP A
AB 939 OPEN SPACE TYCO

FUND FUND FUND
117 121 122

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $0 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $5,547 $0 $387,580
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $0 $96,123 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $62,000 $0 $0
Other Revenue $0 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $67,547 $96,123 $387,580
INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $67,547 $96,123 $387,580

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $231,848 ($51,160) $2,012,109
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $299,395 $44,963 $2,399,689

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $3,475 $0 $0
Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0
Capital Improvements $0 $0 $1,542,162
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $3,475 $0 $1,542,162
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $44,963 $21,090
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $3,475 $44,963 $1,563,252

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $295,920 $0 $836,437
Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $295,920 $0 $836,437

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
Special Revenue Funds
2 1297

PARK/ BAYVIEW DRIVE

RECREATION DISTRICT ADMIN

FACILITY TAX EXPENSE

FUND FUND
125 135

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $57,526 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $7,802 $135
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0
Current Service Charges $0 $0
Other Revenue $49,364 $5,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $114,692 $5,135
INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $114,692 $5,135

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $312,746 $5,072
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $427,438 $10,207

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $0 $1,900
Capital Outlay $0 $0
Capital Improvements $419,690 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $419,690 $1,900
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $3,000
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $419,690 $4,900

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $7,748 $5,307
Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $7,748 $5,307

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
Special Revenue Funds
3 1298

BEACH DRIVE DISTRICT

ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNITY / DEV PROPOSITION PROPOSITION

EXPENSE BLOCK GRANT A C

FUND FUND FUND
139 140 145 146

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $0 $474,542 $393,260
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $101 $0 $11,507 $39,458
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $233,089 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $0 $0 $708 $0
Other Revenue $3,950 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $4,051 $233,089 $486,757 $432,718 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $4,051 $233,089 $486,757 $432,718

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $3,744 $3,192 $419,678 $1,485,636
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $7,795 $236,281 $906,435 $1,918,354

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $1,500 $0 $183,720 $270,000
Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Improvements $0 $233,089 $0 $1,590,290
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,500 $233,089 $183,720 $1,860,290 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $2,500 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $4,000 $233,089 $183,720 $1,860,290

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $3,795 $3,192 $722,715 $58,064 Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $3,795 $3,192 $722,715 $58,064

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
Special Revenue Funds
4 1299

MEASURE R MEASURE M MEASURE W GRANT

FUND FUND FUND FUND
147 148 149 150

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $295,215 $334,577 $157,832 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $8,065 $16,849 $4,528 $0
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $3,008,882
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $1,239,070
Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0
Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $17,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $303,280 $351,426 $162,360 $4,264,952 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $303,280 $351,426 $162,360 $4,264,952

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $339,013 $719,379 $172,625 $335,051
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $642,293 $1,070,805 $334,985 $4,600,003

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $0 $0 $0 $1,218,199
Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Improvements $632,226 $829,150 $329,500 $3,376,867 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $632,226 $829,150 $329,500 $4,595,066 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $632,226 $829,150 $329,500 $4,595,066

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $10,067 $241,655 $5,485 $4,937 Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $10,067 $241,655 $5,485 $4,937

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
Special Revenue Funds
5 1300
2022-23

SUPPLEMENTAL

AIR QUALITY LAW ENFORCEMENT AMERICAN RESCUE

IMPROVEMENT SERVICES FEMA CARES ACT PLAN ACT

FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND
152 153 157 158 159

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $127,424 $0 $0 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $2,097 $9,632 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/State $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $27,097 $137,056 $0 $0 $0
INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $27,097 $137,056 $0 $0 $0

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $105,515 $386,722 ($1,004,055) $310,537 $2,310,876 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $132,612 $523,778 ($1,004,055) $310,537 $2,310,876

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $5,000 $121,598 $0 $0 $0
Capital Outlay $50,000 $62,404 $0 $0 $0
Capital Improvements $0 0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $55,000 $184,002 $0 $0 $0
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,313,107
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $55,000 $184,002 $0 $0 $1,313,107

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $77,612 $339,776 ($1,004,055) $310,537 $997,769 Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 77,612 $339,776 ($1,004,055) $310,537 $997,769

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
2022-23
Midyear Budget
Special Revenue Funds
6 1301

ASSET SEIZURE/

SEWER STORM DRAIN FORFEITURE

FUND FUND FUND
160 161 170

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $0 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $75,022 $56,348 $14,985
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $8,000 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $1,110,405 $0 $0
Other Revenue $0 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $1,193,427 $56,348 $14,985
INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $700,000 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $1,193,427 $756,348 $14,985

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $3,131,806 $2,395,337 $617,482
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $4,325,233 $3,151,685 $632,467

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $565,742 $504,381 $5,200
Capital Outlay $0 $0 $56,933
Capital Improvements 2,918,714 2,434,417 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $3,484,456 $2,938,798 $62,133
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $3,484,456 $2,938,798 $62,133

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $840,777 $212,887 $570,334 Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $840,777 $212,887 $570,334

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
Special Revenue Funds
7 1302
RTI

FIRE RTI UNDERSEA CABLE

PROTECTION UNDERSEA CABLE TIDELANDS

FUND FUND FUND
180 190 191

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $0 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $0 $437,121 $194,645
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0
Other Revenue $9,800 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $9,800 $437,121 $194,645
INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $19,500 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $29,300 $437,121 $194,645

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 ($7,769) $881,076 $395,675
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $21,531 $1,318,197 $590,320

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $21,531 $0 $0
Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0
Capital Improvements $0 $1,078,952 170,336
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $21,531 $1,078,952 $170,336
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $239,245 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $21,531 $1,318,197 $170,336

DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $0 ($0) $419,984
Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $0 ($0) $419,984

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
Special Revenue Funds
8 1303
Debt Service Fd

BAYVIEW DRIVE LOWER PIER

CAPITAL GREENWICH DISTRICT DISTRICT

LEASE REVENUE IMPROVEMENT VILLAGE N UNDERGROUND REDEMPTION REDEMPTION

BOND FUND FUND UTILITIES FUND FUND
201 301 313 609 610

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $0 $233,295 $0 $1,991 $75
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Other Revenue $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $0 $243,295 $0 $1,991 $75
INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $685,860 $4,614,380 $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $685,860 $4,857,675 $0 $1,991 $75

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $95,224 $9,412,840 $120,898 $169,100 $31,289
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $781,084 $14,270,515 $120,898 $171,091 $31,364

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0
Capital Outlay $0 $371,695 $0 $0 $0
Capital Improvements $0 8,460,290 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $8,951,985 $0 $0 $0
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $8,951,985 $0 $0 $0 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT $716,900 $0 $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $64,184 $5,318,530 $120,898 $171,091 $31,364 Reserved for New Corporate City Yard Construction $2,189,278 (with contingency)
Reserve for Capital Facilities $841,393
Reserve for Fire Facility Payments $197,879
Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $64,184 $2,089,980 $120,898 $171,091 $31,364

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
Midyear Budget
2022-23
Special Revenue Funds Agency Funds
9 1304

BEACH DRIVE BEACH DRIVE MYRTLE LOMA

DISTRICT DISTRICT AVENUE DRIVE

REDEMPTION RESERVE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT

FUND FUND FUND FUND
611 612 617 618

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $0 $0 $0
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $0
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $0
Use of Money/Property $809 $110 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $0
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $0
Current Service Charges $0 $0 $0 $0
Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $809 $110 $0 $0
INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $809 $110 $0 $0

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $81,415 $1,595 $46,762 $114,807
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $82,224 $1,705 $46,762 $114,807

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Improvements
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $0 $0 $0
INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $0

ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR

FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $82,224 $1,705 $46,762 $114,807 Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $82,224 $1,705 $46,762 $114,807 Midyear Budget

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
2022-23
Agency Funds
10 1305

BAYVIEW

DRIVE EQUIPMENT

RESERVE INSURANCE REPLACEMENT TOTAL

FUND FUND FUND (MEMORANDUM
619 705 715 ONLY)

ESTIMATED REVENUE
Taxes $0 $0 $0 $38,623,582
Licenses/Permits $0 $0 $0 $1,504,280
Fines/Forfeitures $0 $0 $0 $1,740,260
Use of Money/Property $361 $12,232 $0 $2,721,260
Intergovernmental/State $0 $0 $0 $4,203,051
Intergovernmental/County $0 $0 $0 $104,123
Intergovernmental/Federal $0 $0 $0 $1,472,159
Current Service Charges $0 $3,114,147 $2,055,550 $13,798,595 Other Revenue $0 $0 $17,435 $370,662
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE $361 $3,126,379 $2,072,985 $64,537,973 INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN $0 $1,154,685 $978,680 $10,126,429 ESTIMATED FUNDS AVAILABLE $361 $4,281,064 $3,051,665 $74,664,401

FUND BALANCE
7/1/22 $4,884 $2,359,393 $9,533,012 $59,601,506
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $5,245 $6,640,457 $12,584,677 $133,514,600

APPROPRIATIONS
Operating Budget $0 $3,640,457 $2,721,135 $57,679,083
Capital Outlay $0 $0 $1,180,235 $1,842,287
Capital Improvements $0 $0 $0 $25,441,094
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $3,640,457 $3,901,370 $84,962,464 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT $0 $0 $0 $10,126,429
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS OUT $0 $3,640,457 $3,901,370 $95,088,893 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT $716,900
ADJUST FUND BALANCE FOR $1,180,235 $1,180,235
FIXED ASSET ADDITIONS 2
ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30/23 $5,245 $3,000,000 $9,863,542 $38,889,042 Designated Building Maintenance Funds $647,236
Investment in Fixed Assets $4,721,542
Assigned reserve for Police Department Radio Equipment/South Bay $30,000 Interoperability Project.

Records Technology Fee $645,249
Assigned reserve for Accounting ERP $333,645
Available Fund Balance 6/30/23 $5,245 $3,000,000 $3,485,870 $14,228,823 Midyear Budget

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH BUDGET SUMMARY
2022-23
Agency Fund Internal Service Funds
11 1306
FY 2022-2023 CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE/TRAINING BUDGET SUMMARY

CONFERENCE/TRAINING JACKSON MASSEY FRANCOIS SAEMANN DETOY ARMATO CAMPBELL TOTAL INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION SUMMER SEMINAR $1,973.08 $1,949.20 (8/11/22 - 8/14/22)
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE $350.00
(9/9/22)
INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION BOARD INSTALLATION $40.00 $40.00 (9/29/22)
CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE TOUR $1,385.61 (1/8/23 - 1/11/23)
(Expenses have not been finalized)
UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS WINTER MEETING $2,481.00 (1/17/23 - 1/20/23)
(Expenses have not been finalized)
SACRAMENTO MEETING WITH LEGISLATORS $690.87
(1/29/23 - 1/30/23)
(Expenses have not been finalized)
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES NEW MAYORS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ACADEMY $1,707.93 $75.00 (2/1/23 - 2/3/23)
(Expenses have not been finalized)
INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSOCIATION WINTER SEMINAR $1,208.00 $1,308.00 (2/3/23 - 2/5/23)
(Expenses have not been finalized)

SOUTHERN CA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL CONFERENCE AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY (5/4/23 - 5/5/23)

CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MUNICIPAL SEMINAR (Tentative: 5/11/23 - 5/14/23)

UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS ANNUAL MEETING
(6/2/23 - 6/5/23)
$7,778.56 $0.00 $3,015.93 $75.00 $0.00 $1,989.20 $350.00 $13,208.69 BUDGET: $17,000.00
REAMAINING: $3,791.31
Attachment 61307

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ACCOUNT NO.:

CATEGORY: Public Building and Ground Improvements 140-8606-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 606 Longfellow Sidewalk Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project provides improvements and replacement
of sidewalk panels along Longfellow Avenue in order to
comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
and meet the latest Federal Standards. Project to be
bid out together with Project 601 and 698.

JUSTIFICATION:

City is required to spend Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds as part of an agreement
with LA County on ADA improvement projects.

STATUS: Project Approvals/Bidding
Council to award construction contract at February 28
meeting with CIP 601 and 698.

MAINTENANCE:

No additional maintenance required.

COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS
Construction $98,081

CURRENT REQUEST
140 CDBG Fund $98,081
PROJECT TOTAL: $98,081 TOTAL FY 22-23 CIP FUNDING: $98,081 1 Attachment 71308

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ACCOUNT NO.:

CATEGORY: Public Building and Ground Improvements 301-8607-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 607 Record Center Renovation
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project provides necessary safety improvements
to the City’s Record Center that is currently housed in the former shower and locker room area in the lower
level of the Community Center. The area is not
designed, or properly set up, to be a Records Center
for the City to ensure safe retention and processing of public records. The Records Center is in need of
several improvements to bring the area up to current
health and building safety standards, including, but not limited to, new sprinkler system, new ventilation
system, pipe repairs, seismic retrofit of records
shelving, and lighting modifications. The Project
currently includes funding for design of the
improvements; construction costs will be further
defined through the design process.

JUSTIFICATION:

Having a proper Records Center will allow City Clerk
staff to ensure safe storage of public records and
create and maintain a proper archiving methodology to
allow departments to request records in the Clerk's
custody and receive them in a timely manner. This will
help reduce the amount of time that staff spends
searching for records in response to Public Records
Requests. The improvements will also allow
departments to submit Records Transfer Requests to
the City Clerk's office for storage in the Records Center using proper archiving methodologies and process
destruction requests in a timely manner.

STATUS: Preliminary Design
Preliminary design.

MAINTENANCE:

Additional maintenance to be determined.

COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS
Design $160,000
Construction TBD

CURRENT REQUEST
301 Capital Improvement Fund $160,000
PROJECT TOTAL: $160,000 TOTAL FY 22-23 CIP FUNDING: $160,000 2 1309

CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS ACCOUNT NO.:

CATEGORY: Public Building and Ground Improvements 301-8610-4201 PROJECT NO./TITLE: CIP 610 Fort Lots-O-Fun Wall and Gate Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project provides necessary improvements and
repairs to the existing retaining wall and wooden gate
at Fort Lots-O-Fun. The Project currently includes
funding for design of the improvements; construction
costs will be further defined through the design
process.

JUSTIFICATION:

The concrete retaining wall surrounding the park is in
need of urgent repair as it is experiencing rotational
failure and significant cracking. The wall damage has
recently experienced further deterioration following
recent heavy rains in early January 2023. The wooden
gate entrance to the park is also in need in urgent
repair or replacement due to significant deterioration
and termite damage.

STATUS: Preliminary Design
Preliminary design.

MAINTENANCE:

Additional maintenance to be determined.

COST TO COMPLETE PROJECT REMAINING PRIOR YEAR FUNDS
Design $100,000
Construction TBD

CURRENT REQUEST
301 Capital Improvement Fund $100,000
PROJECT TOTAL: $100,000 TOTAL FY 22-23 CIP FUNDING: $100,000 3 1310
City of Hermosa Beach
Staff Report
City Hall
1315 Valley Drive
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0091
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Hermosa Beach City Council Regular Meeting of February 28, 2023

AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDED

CURB RAMPS, SIDEWALK, AND AMERICAN WITH

DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) IMPROVEMENTS
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council:

1. Award a construction contract for curb ramps, sidewalk, and ADA improvements to Gentry General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $207,793 (Attachment 4);

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to establish a project contingency amount of $82,027.07;

3. Adopt the attached resolution entitled "A Resolution of The City Council of the City of Hermosa Beach Approving the Construction of Curb Ramps, Sidewalk, and ADA Improvements Pursuant to Government Code Section 830.6 and Establishing a Project Payment Account” (Attachment 3);

4. Authorize the Mayor to execute the construction contract and the City Clerk to attest, subject to approval by the City Attorney; and

5. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion following final completion of the project.

Executive Summary:

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects 601-Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps, 698-ADA Improvements, and the newly proposed mid-year budget CIP-606 Longfellow Sidewalk Improvements provide reconstruction of curb ramps to current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards including: associated adjustment of utilities to grade; removal and construction of curb and gutter; repair of asphalt; striping and markings; and sidewalk panel replacement at various locations as shown in Attachments 5 and 6. Staff received construction bids for the combined projects and recommends City Council award a construction contract to lowest responsible bidder, Gentry General Engineering Inc.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 1 of 6 Printed on 2/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1311
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0091
Background:

CIP 601, 606, and 698 are primarily funded through the Community Development Block Grant Program, as well as funds from the Capital Improvement Fund. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is authorized under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The primary objective of Title I is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for lowand moderate-income persons.

The CDBG program, funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), offers communities opportunities to compete nationally for funds to implement program activities that best meet the needs of their communities, in accordance with the national objectives and requirements of the CDBG program.

The City of Hermosa Beach is a participating city in the County of Los Angeles Community Development Block Grant Program. The Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) administers CDBG funding, on behalf of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, for the County and 48 participating cities.

The CDBG program has three primary objectives:

1. Benefit those with low- and moderate-income;

2. Aid in preventing neighborhood deterioration; and

3. Meet other urgent community development needs due to natural disasters or other emergencies.

Use of CDBG funds is limited to certain types of construction projects in Hermosa Beach and requires pre-approval by LACDA. CDBG funds cannot be used for paving, but may be used for sidewalk and ADA curb ramps. The City receives approximately $60,000 to $100,000 each year through the program and staff typically accumulates funds for two to three years, while observing grant spending deadlines, until there is a sufficient amount available to advertise a larger project to ensure efficiency and cost effectiveness for construction.

The City currently has three CDBG projects that include construction of ADA curb ramps along Prospect Avenue and sidewalk panel replacement along Longfellow Avenue to meet current ADA standards to improve accessibility for all, including disabled adults and/or elderly that use wheelchairs, canes, walkers, and crutches. The ADA curb ramps construction is a continuation of previous CDBG projects to improve the ADA curb ramps along the safe route to school on Prospect Avenue. The City Council approved the use of CGBD funds to improve segments of sidewalk along Longfellow Avenue at its January 11, 2022 meeting. The use of funds was subsequently approved by LACDA. In the City’s Sidewalk Assessment, Longfellow Avenue was assessed as one of the poorest condition sidewalks and was recommend for repairs and improvements.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 2 of 6 Printed on 2/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1312
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0091
A portion of the project contingency, which is a mix of primarily local funds as well as some CDBG funds, may be used to construct additional high priority curb ramps and sidewalk panel replacement, subject to the remaining contingency funding following the completion of the base scope of work on Prospect Avenue and Longfellow Avenue. The additional improvements may include other limited sidewalk panel replacements or ramp upgrades necessary to complete the accessible route for CIP 549 Temporary Beach Accessible Routes on 2nd Street, 11th Street, and 22nd Steet.

On January 23, 2022, the combined project was advertised for formal competitive bidding in the local newspaper and on Planet Bids, the City’s electronic bidding platform.

Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
January 8, 2019 Approve and allocate CDBG funds for construction of sidewalk curb ramps.

March 10, 2020 Approve and allocate CDBG funds for construction of sidewalk curb ramps along Prospect Ave
January 11, 2022 Approve and allocate CDBG funds for construction of sidewalk improvements along Longfellow Ave.

Analysis:

On February 13, 2023, the City received four bids, which were opened, and read aloud by the City Clerk (Attachment 1). The bid results are summarized below.

Bidders Amount
Gentry General Engineering. Inc. $207,793.00
C J Concrete Paving, Inc. $227,254.50
CT&T Concrete Paving, Inc. $228,167.00
Onyx Paving Company, Inc. $381,000.00
Staff reviewed the bid documents and found the apparent low bidder, Gentry General Engineering, Inc., to be a responsible and responsive bidder. Gentry General Engineering, Inc’s. contractor license is active and in good standing with the Contractor’s State License Board. City Staff contacted references and confirmed competency through completion of recent projects of similar type of work within the past two years.

Gentry General Engineering, Inc. has completed sidewalk construction for the City of Orange, City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of El Segundo, and City of Torrance in 2022. The referenced cities reported highly satisfactory work and willingness to work with them if given the opportunity again.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 3 of 6 Printed on 2/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1313
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0091
reported highly satisfactory work and willingness to work with them if given the opportunity again.

Gentry General Engineering, Inc. has also performed prior work in the City of Hermosa Beach in the past and the work was very satisfactory. Overall, staff finds the low bidder to be a qualified contractor to complete the proposed work for the project.

Public Works Inspectors would provide construction management and inspections services due to the limited scope of work and similarity with work inspected daily for private developments and other projects. Staff anticipates construction to start as soon as March 2023, with an anticipated completion date in May 2023.

ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Consistency
The project is consistent with the goals of the Council Approved 2022 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan as it directly works to advance the construction of improvements that remove physical barriers and facilitate access for all individuals.

Environmental Analysis
The Project is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Existing Facilities). The proposed work is a minor alteration of existing public structures or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing use. No exceptions to the CEQA exemption apply.

General Plan Consistency:

PLAN Hermosa, the City’s General Plan, was adopted by the City Council in August 2017. The Prospect Avenue Curb Ramps and Longfellow Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Improvements supports several PLAN Hermosa goals and policies that are listed below.

Mobility Element
Goal 3. Public rights-of-way supporting a multimodal and people-oriented transportation system that provides diversity and flexibility on how users choose to be mobile.

Policies:
· 3.1 Enhance public rights-of-way. Where right-of-way clearance allows, enhance public right of ways to improve connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled persons, and public transit stops.
· 3.2 Complete pedestrian network. Prioritize investment in designated priority sidewalks to ensure a complete network of sidewalks and pedestrian-friendly amenities that enhances pedestrian safety, access opportunities and connectivity to destinations. · 3.10 Require ADA standards. Require that all public rights-of-way be designed per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards by incorporating crosswalks, curb ramps, pedestrian signals, and other components to provide ease of access for disabled persons.

City of Hermosa Beach Page 4 of 6 Printed on 2/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1314
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0091
Infrastructure Element
Goal 2. Roadway infrastructure maintenance supports convenient, attractive, and complete streets and associated amenities.

Policy:
· 2.4 Sidewalk Improvements. Consider innovative funding strategies, such as cost-sharing, ADA accessibility grants, or sidewalk dedications, to improve the overall condition, safety, and accessibility of sidewalks.

Fiscal Impact:

This construction is funded primarily with grant money from the CDBG program, as well as funds from the Capital Improvement Fund. The City has sufficient funds appropriated in the Capital Improvement Program Project budget for CIP 601 and CIP 698. In the mid-year budget, CIP 606 is proposed to be created to appropriate $98,081 of CDBG funds which have been granted to the City.

The requested project contingency, which is primarily to cover unknowns during construction, would allow for the remaining CDBG grant funds appropriated in CIP 606 to be used to construct additional sidewalk improvements and also includes $18,164 in local funds from CIP 549 Temporary Beach Accessible Routes to build additional ADA curb ramps to complete the beach mat accessible routes.

The additional work would be subject to available contingency following completion of the base contract scope of work.

Agreement Request
Request Amount FY 2022-2023 Budget Dept. Account # Total Contract Amount $207,793 301-8601-4201, 140-8601-4201,140-8698
-4201, 301-8549-4201,140-8606-4201
$207,793
Attachments:

1. Bid Opening Log

2. Gentry General Engineering, Inc. Bid Documents

3. Draft Resolution

4. Draft Agreement

5. Map of ADA Improvements locations on Prospect Avenue

6. Map of CDBG Sidewalk repair along Longfellow Avenue

7. Link to January 8, 2019 City Council Staff Report

8. Link to March 10, 2020 City Council Staff Report
City of Hermosa Beach Page 5 of 6 Printed on 2/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1315
Staff Report
REPORT 23-0091

9. Link to January 11, 2022 City Council Staff Report
Respectfully Submitted by: Jonathan Pascual, Assistant Engineer Concur: Andrew Nguyen, Associate Engineer
Concur: Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director
Noted for Fiscal Impact: Viki Copeland, Finance Director Legal Review: Patrick Donegan, City Attorney
Approved: Suja Lowenthal, City Manager
City of Hermosa Beach Page 6 of 6 Printed on 2/24/2023
powered by Legistar™1316
1317
16 NOTICE TO BIDDERS

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) REQUIREMENTS
A Bidder is required to review and familiarize itself with all Federal clauses and provisions provided on the following pages. Failure to comply with and/or meet the requirements may result in a bid being determined incomplete or non-responsive.

A Bidder shall complete and include in their Bid Proposal the following forms specified in the Table below (highlighted in gray).

Construction Compliance Form
Submit Form with Bid
Proposal
Submit Form At
Pre-Con Meeting
Prime
(Bidder)
Sub(s) Prime
(Bidder)
Sub(s)
County Lobbying Certification (pg. 59) ▲ - - ▲
Report of Additional Classification & Rate (pg. 51) ▲ - - ▲ Contractor’s List of Proposed Subcontractors (pg.
52)
▲ - - ▲
Worker’s Compensation Certification (pg. 53) ▲ - - ▲
Non-Segregated Facilities Certification (pg. 54) ▲ - - ▲ Past Performance Certification (pg. 56) ▲ - - ▲
Non-Collusion Declaration (pg. 57) ▲ - - -
Federal Lobbyist Certification (pg. 58) ▲ - - -
Equal Employment Opportunity Commitment (pg. 55) ▲ - - ▲ Compliance Clean Air and Water Acts (pg. 60) ▲ - - ▲
Declaration of Intent to Comply with Section 3 (pg.
61)
▲ - - ▲
Agency Report of Contract Award (pg. 63) - - ▲ ▲
Section 3 Worker Certification (pg. 64) - - ▲ ▲
Targeted Section 3 Worker Certification (pg. 65) - - ▲ ▲ Section 3 Business Concern Certification (pg. 66) - - ▲ ▲ Section 3 Qualitative Efforts Form (pg. 67) - - ▲ ▲
*The City may request the completion of additional forms not listed in the table above.

The successful Bidder and its subcontractor(s) must submit a Certified Payroll Report, Statement of Compliance, and a Section 3 Labor Hours Report each week until the Contract is final and complete. A Certification of Understanding and Authorization form and Fringe Benefit Statement shall also be provided with the first payroll report. The City or its representative shall have the option of inspecting and/or auditing all records and other written materials used by the Contractor in preparing its billings to the City as condition precedent to any payment to the Contractor or in 1318
17 response to a construction claim or a Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.) request. The Contractor will promptly furnish documents requested by the City at no cost.

Additionally, the Contractor shall be subject to examination and audit at the request of the City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of five (5) years after final payment under the Contract. 1319
18 IV. BID DOCUMENTS
A. PROPOSAL
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & & CIP NO.698 ADA IMPROVMENTS CONTRACTOR: Date: ___________________
TO: City of Hermosa Beach
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Hall Hermosa Beach, California, 90254
Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned declares that he/she has carefully examined the location of the proposed work and that he/she has examined the Plans and Specifications, has read the Contract Documents, and hereby agrees to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, and services to do all work required for:

CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO.698 ADA IMPROVMENTS
In accordance with the Plans and Specifications prepared by the Engineer, in accordance with the Special Provisions and Technical Provisions, the Contract Documents, and in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction 2021 and Unified Building Code for Construction (current edition) (except Sections 1-9), and the requirements of the Engineer under said documents, for the prices shown herein.

The Contractor also certifies that he/she is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations.

Bid items costs shall include but not limited to mobilization, Bonds, Insurance, labor, equipment, materials, overhead, and profit, any and all other indirect costs shall be considered full compensation for each bid item.

All work shall be completed within (40) working days from the date the notice to proceed is issued by the Engineer.

Contractor Signature PWCR Registration Number
Gentry General Engineering, Inc February 3, 2023
1000024189
1320
19 B. BIDDING SCHEDULE
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO.698 ADA IMPROVMENTS
CONTRACTOR NAME: _____________________________________________________ Item
No.

Estimated
Quantity
Unit Description of Work Payment
Reference
Unit
Price Total
1 1 LS Mobilization and Demobilization
(5% maximum)
101-3
- $
2 1 LS Traffic Control 103-10 - $
3 1250 SF Remove Pavement Markings 102-3 $ $
4 2630 SF Install Crosswalks and Pavement
Markings
110-5
$ $
5 110 LF Paint Curb Markings 110-6 $ $
6 800 SF Construct Sidewalk (Outside of Curb
Ramp Area)
108-2
$ $
7 3442 SF Remove and replace Sidewalk
(Along Longfellow)
108-2
$ $
8 120 LF Construct 18” Curb and Gutter
(Outside of Curb Ramp Area)
109-2
$ $
9 1 EA Construct ADA Curb Ramp – Case
B Type 1
107-10 $ $
10 9 EA Construct ADA Curb Ramp – Case
B Type 2
107-10 $ $
11 1 EA Construct ADA Curb Ramp – Case
D Type 1
107-10 $ $
12 2 EA Construct ADA Curb Ramp – Case
D Type 2
107-10 $ $
Total (Base Bid) $
Gentry General Engineering, Inc
6,300.00
40,000.00

5.00 6,250.00

7.00 18,410.00

7.00 770.00

11.50 9,200.00

11.50 39,583.00

89.00 10,680.00
4,600.00 4,600.00
6,300.00 56,700.00
5,100.00 5,100.00
5,100.00 10,200.00
207,793.00
TOTAL BASE BID (IN FIGURES): ____________________________________________________ $207,793.00 TOTAL BASE BID (IN WORDS): two hundred seven thousand seven hundred ninety-three dollars 1321
20 In case of any discrepancy between the words and the figures, the words shall prevail. If the unit price and the total amount for any item are not in agreement, the unit price alone shall be considered to represent the bidder’s intention and all totals will be corrected to conform thereto. Attached hereto is cash, a certified check, a cashier's check, or a bidder's bond in the amount of Dollars, said
amount being not less than 10 percent of the amount bid. It is agreed a portion equal to the difference between the low bid and second low bid shall be retained as liquidated damages by the City if the undersigned fails or refuses to execute the Contract and furnish the required bonds and certificates of insurance within the time provided.

CONTRACTOR SIGNTAURE:

PW REGISTRATION NUMBER: _______________________________ CONTRACTOR’S STATE LICENSE NUMBER: _______________________________ CONTRACTOR’S COMPANY NAME: _______________________________ 1000024189
974279
Gentry General Engineering, Inc
ten percent
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
23 D. BIDDER'S ASSURANCE
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVMENTS
FROM:

Name of Bidder:

Business Address:

Telephone No:

TO:

Members of the City Council
c/o City Hall
City of Hermosa Beach, California
Members of the City Council:

Pursuant to your published Notice Inviting Bids for: CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO.698 ADA

IMPROVMENTS
The undersigned declares that he/she has carefully examined the location of the proposed work; that he/she has carefully examined the Plans and Specifications and read the accompanying Instructions to Bidders and hereby proposes to furnish all materials, machinery, tools, labor, and services and do all the work necessary to complete the project in accordance with said Plans and Specifications and other Contract Documents at the item prices on the bidding schedule.

BY: TITLE:

Gentry General Engineering, Inc
9277 Archibald Ave
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 330-1128
President
1327
24 E. BIDDER'S DECLARATION
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVMENTS
It is understood and agreed that:

1. The undersigned has carefully examined all documents which will form a part of the Contract; namely, the Notice Inviting Bids, the Instructions to Bidders, this Proposal, the Bid Bond, the Contract, the Faithful Performance Bond, Warranty Bond, the Payment Bond, the federal requirements, if any, the Plans and Specifications, the Special Provisions, and the Technical Provisions.

2. The undersigned has, by investigation at the site of the work and otherwise, satisfied himself as to the nature and location of the work and fully informed himself as to all conditions and matters, which can in any way affect the work or the cost thereof.

3. The undersigned fully understands the scope of work and has carefully checked all words and figures inserted in this Proposal and he further understands that the City will not be responsible for any errors or omissions in the preparation of the Proposal.

4. The undersigned agrees and acknowledges that he is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and that the undersigned will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Contract if it is awarded to the undersigned.

The undersigned will execute the Contract and furnish the required statutory bonds and certificates of insurance within the period of time specified in the Contract Documents.

The undersigned will begin work after award of Contract and a Notice to Proceed has been given as herein specified and will complete said work within the time specified in the Bidding Schedule.

5. The undersigned certifies that this Proposal is genuine and not sham or collusive, or made in the interest or on behalf of a person not herein named, and the undersigned has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a sham bid nor induced any other person, firm, or corporation to refrain from bidding.

6. The undersigned will accept an award and enter into a Contract for all work scheduled herein on which he puts in a bid. The awards for such work are to be entirely at the discretion of the Owner after evaluation of the bids as submitted. The undersigned agrees that the Owner shall recover or retain as liquidated damages an amount equal to the difference between the low bid and amount of the bid of the bidder with whom the City enters into a Contract, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder in accordance with the provisions of the Public Contract Code section 20174 in the event of his failure to execute a Contract and furnish required bonds and insurance therefor within the time provided.

7. This bid will not be withdrawn within a period of ninety (90) days after the date of its proper opening by the City.
1328
1329
In attendance:

Board of Directors:

GENTRY GENERAL ENGINEERING
Gentry General Engineering, Inc.
5 minutes
Date: February 3, 2023
7:30 a.m.

Brenton Gentry - President, CEO and Secretary
I called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m.

I made a motion to submit to the City of Hermosa Beach a statement of those authorized to sign and contract on behalf of Gentry General Engineering, Inc. Those authorized are as follows:

Brenton Gentry, President, CEO and Secretary
9277 Archibald Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
The aforementioned individual can act alone to execute any and all documents on behalf of the Corporation and to bind the Corporation with respect thereto. All were in favor and none were opposed.

I called a conclusion of this meeting at 7:35 a.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Brenton Gentry
President, CEO and Secretary
__ ... -
1330
26 F. CERTIFICATE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION BY CONTRACTORS
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVMENTS
As suppliers of goods or services to the City, the firm listed below certifies that it does not discriminate in its employment with regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; that it is in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local directives, and executive orders regarding non-discrimination in employment; and that it agrees to pursue positively and aggressively the principle of equal opportunity in employment.

We agree specifically:

1. To establish or observe employment policies which affirmatively promote opportunities for minority persons at all job levels.

2. To communicate this policy to all persons concerned, including all company employees, outside recruiting services, especially those serving minority communities, and to the minority communities at large.

3. To take affirmative steps to hire minority employees within the company.

FIRM

TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING

SIGNATURE
DATE
Please include any additional information available regarding equal opportunity employment programs now in effect within your company:

Gentry General Engineering, Inc
President
February 3, 2023
1331
27 G. CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVMENTS
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. (Section 1861, Labor Code.) Signature:

Name:

Title:

Name of Company:

Brenton Gentry
President
Gentry General Engineering, Inc
1332
28 H. DECLARATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO CONTRACT
[Labor Code Section 1777.1; Public Contract Code Section 6109] CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVEMENTS
The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of the contractor, certifies and declares that:

1. The undersigned contractor is aware of Section 1771.1 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code, which prohibit a contractor or subcontractor who has been found by the Labor Commissioner or the Director of Industrial Relations to be in violation of certain provisions of the Labor Code, from bidding on, being awarded, or performing work as a subcontractor on a public works project for specified periods of time.

2. The undersigned contractor is not ineligible to bid on, be awarded or perform work as a subcontractor on a public works project by virtue of the foregoing provisions of Sections 1771.1 or 1777.7 of the California Labor Code or any other provision of law.

3. The undersigned contractor is aware of California Public Contract Code Section 6109, which states:
“(a) A public entity, as defined in Section 1100 [of the Public Contract Code], may not permit a contractor or subcontractor who is ineligible to bid or work on, or be awarded, a public works project pursuant to Section 1777.1 or 1777.7 of the Labor Code to bid on, be awarded, or perform work as a subcontractor on, a public works project. Every public works project shall contain a provision prohibiting a contractor from performing work on a public works project with a subcontractor who is ineligible to perform work on the public works project pursuant to Section 1771.1 or 1777.7 of the Labor Code.”
“(b) Any contract on a public works project entered into between a contractor and a debarred subcontractor is void as a matter of law. A debarred subcontractor may not receive any public money for performing work as a subcontractor on a public works contract, and any public money that may have been paid to a debarred subcontractor by a contractor on the project shall be returned to the awarding body. The contractor shall be responsible for the payment of wages to workers of a debarred subcontractor who has been allowed to work on the project.”

4. The undersigned contractor has investigated the eligibility of each and every subcontractor the undersigned contractor intends to use on this public works project and determined that none of them is ineligible to perform work as a subcontractor on a public works project by virtue of the foregoing provisions of the Public Contract Code, Sections 1771.1 or 1777.7 of the Labor Code, or any other provision of law.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of
, at (place of execution), California.

Signature:

Name:

Title:

Name of Company:
3 February
2023 Rancho Cucamonga
Brenton Gentry
President
Gentry General Engineering, Inc
1333
29 I. NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVEMENTS
The undersigned declares:

I am the ___________________ of ______________________________, the party making the foregoing Bid.

The Bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The Bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The Bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The Bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any Bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The Bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the Bid Price of the Bidder or any other Bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the Bid Price, or of that of any other Bidder. All statements contained in the Bid are true. The Bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her Bid Price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a Bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the Bidder.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on __________ [date], at ___________________ [city], ___________________ [state].

NAME OF BIDDER

SIGNATURE OF BIDDER

ADDRESS OF BIDDER

CITY STATE ZIP
President Gentry General Engineering, Inc
02/03/2023 Rancho Cucamonga
CA
Gentry General Engineering, Inc
9277 Archibald Ave
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
1334
1335
30 J. REFERENCES OF WORK
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVEMENTS
Date: ________________
The following are the names, addresses and phone numbers/ email addresses for three public agencies for which Bidder has performed similar work within the past five years.

All contact information must be current.

1. Name and address of Public Agency
Name and Telephone No. of Project Manager
Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Name and address of Public Agency
Name and Telephone No. of Project Manager
Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Name and address of Public Agency
Name and Telephone No. of Project Manager
Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed
For additional References, please add separate sheets
February 3, 2023
please see attached
please see attached
please see attached
1336
9277 Archibald Ave.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
off: 909.330.1128
fax: 909.330.1129
[email protected]
Prior Projects
2013 – $34,500.00
City of Fontana
Damaged Street/Sidewalk
Asphalt & Concrete R&R
8353 Sierra Ave
Fontana, Ca 92335
Jason Jojola: No Email Address
909.350.6636
2014 – $30,000.00
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Solar Shade Structure
8794 Lion St.

Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
909.477.2730 (No Email Address)
2015 – $495,000
City of Whittier
Fire Loop/Fire Sprinkler Repair
9401Painter Ave
Whittier, Ca 90605
Karla Embry: [email protected]
562.332.9303
2015 – $41,000
City of Glendora
Water Improvement
116 E. Foothill Blvd.

Glendora, Ca 91741
Carlos Cigneros: No Email Address
626.786.1285
2016 – $504,420
City of Baldwin Park
Alleyway Street/Sidewalk
Asphalt & Concrete R&R
14403 Pacific Ave
Baldwin Park, Ca 91706
Chase Fidler: [email protected]
626.960.4011
2016 – $619,075
City of Bloomington
ADA Ramp – Repair/Maintenance/Replaced
825 E. 3rd Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415
Haile Ford: [email protected]
909.387.7936
2016 – $173,604
City of Montclair
Alleyway Street/Sidewalk Asphalt & Concrete
5111 Benito St
Montclair, Ca 91763
Steve Stanton: [email protected]
909.625.9444
2017 – $325,000
City of Upland
Damaged Street/Sidewalk
Asphalt & Concrete R&R
1370 North Benson Ave
Upland, Ca 91785
Tony Trejo: [email protected]
909.631.3918
1337
9277 Archibald Ave.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
off: 909.330.1128
fax: 909.330.1129
[email protected]
2017 – $624,688
Santa Ana
Repair Maintenance/Replaced
Damaged Street/Sidewalk
Asphalt & Concrete R&R
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, Ca 92701
Victor So: [email protected]
714.647.5076
2017 – $694,000
City of Corona
Miscellaneous Concrete Repair
400 S. Vicentia Ave, Ste. 210
Corona, Ca 92882
Barry Ghaemi: [email protected]
951.739.4961
2017 – $30,000
City of San Diego
Demo/Backfill/Compact Existing
Vault Location
422 W. Washington St.

San Diego, Ca 92103
Matt Cavan: [email protected]
951.684.1909
2018 – $1.2 Million
City of Torrance
Damaged Street/Sidewalk
Asphalt & Concrete R&R
20500 Madrona Ave
Torrance, Ca 90503
Shin Furukawa: [email protected]
310.618.3073
2018 – $547,950
City of Pasadena
Miscellaneous Concrete Repair
100 Garfield Ave
Pasadena, Ca 91101
Morley Saralya: [email protected]
626.744.3703
2018 – $2.2 Million
City of Torrance
Downtown Torrance Active Transportation
Improvements
20500 Madrona Ave
Torrance, Ca 90503
Justin Gatza: [email protected]
310.618.3032
2019 – $288,974
City of Barstow
Water Treatment Plant Dewatering Pad & Wall
2200 Riverside Dr.

Barstow, Ca 92311
Kody Topkins: [email protected]
760.252.2538
2019 - $544,342
Torrance Unified School District
Anza, Arnold and Hickory ES Site Drainage
21400 Ellinwood Dr
Torrance, CA 90503
Joe Winterburn:
[email protected]
(949) 502-4000
2019 - $714,000
City of Hermosa Beach
8 th Street Improvements Project
8 th Street
Hermosa Beach, CA 90254
Reed Salan: [email protected]
(310) 318-0229
1338
9277 Archibald Ave.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
off: 909.330.1128
fax: 909.330.1129
[email protected]
2019 - $267,000
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
Indus Sewer Main Replacement
20122 Santa Ana Ave
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Rob Hamers: [email protected]
(949) 548-1192
2019 - $285,744
City of Fullerton
Curb/Gutter and Sidewalk Reconstruction
Fullerton, CA 92831
Jose Medina: [email protected]
(714) 738-6863
2019 - $141,312 ($139,573 original bid; work
limits increased)
City of Irvine
Ranch Park Bike Trail Rehabilitation
Irvine, CA 92618
Anthony Caraveo: [email protected]
(949) 724-7365
2019 - $644,763
City of Thousand Oaks
Concrete Replacement and Sidewalk Repair
Program
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Michelle McCarty: [email protected]
(805) 449-2477
2019 - $14,800.00
Whittier Unified School District (Whittier CHS)
Refurbish Long Jump Pits
9401 S. Painter Ave.,
Whittier, CA 90605
Danny True –
[email protected]
(562) 237-0795
2019 - $210,000
Lynwood Middle School (USD)
Storm Drain Improvements
11321 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Manuel Jaramillo: [email protected]
(323)447-0996
2020 - $1,369,000
City of Torrance
Sidewalk Repair for Handicap Accessibility
Torrance, CA 90505
Shin Furukawa: [email protected]
(310) 781-6900
2020 - $19,546
City of Fontana
San Bernardino at Cypress Driveway
Improvements
Fontana, CA 92335
Christopher Smethurst:
[email protected]
(909) 350-6649
2020 - $158,338 ($149,835 original bid;
additional grading work performed)
City of Walnut
Butterfield Park Trail Rehabilitation
21201 La Puente Rd
Walnut, CA 91789
Tony Lopez: [email protected]
(909) 594-9702
1339
9277 Archibald Ave.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
off: 909.330.1128
fax: 909.330.1129
[email protected]
2020 - $29,820
City of Irwindale
Peppertree Bus Shelter Removal and Foothill
Column
5050 N Irwindale Ave
Irwindale, CA 91706
Elizabeth Rodriguez –
[email protected]
(626) 430-2211
2020 - $5,565
City of Irwindale
Arrow Bus Shelter Roof Repair
5050 N Irwindale Ave
Irwindale, CA 91706
Elizabeth Rodriguez –
[email protected]
(626) 430-2211
2021 - $22,000
Whittier Unified School District
Collapsed Storm Drain Repair
9401 S. Painter Ave.,
Whittier, CA 90605
Danny True –
[email protected]
(562) 237-0795
2021 - $29,999
Costa Mesa Sanitary District
Manhole Surface Repairs Phase 7
290 Paularino Ave
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Michael Benesh –
[email protected]
(949) 548-1192
2021 - $366,732
City of Laguna Beach
Zones 2 and 3 Street Concrete Improvements
505 Forest Ave
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Alpha Santos-Guinto –
[email protected]
(949) 497-0729
2021 – $221,318 ($211,965 original bid; extra
work added)
City of Laguna Beach
Ramona Alley Decorative Paving Replacement
505 Forest Ave
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Alpha Santos-Guinto –
[email protected]
(949) 497-0729
2021 - $198,420
Chino Valley Unified School District
Briggs K-8 Waterline Upgrades
11880 Roswell Ave
Chino, CA 91710
Sam Sousa –
[email protected]
(909) 628-1201 x1490
2021 - $125,400
Torrance Unified School District
Seaside Elementary Site Drainage Improvement
2335 Plaza Del Amo
Torrance, CA 90501
Ryan Palmer –
[email protected]
(310) 972-6240
1340
9277 Archibald Ave.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
off: 909.330.1128
fax: 909.330.1129
[email protected]
2021 - $252,796
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Citywide Concrete Repair
10500 Civic Center Dr
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Ernie Ruiz –
[email protected]
(909) 774-4108
2021 - $41,750
State of California
Moro State Deck and ADA Access
715 P Street
Sacramento, CA 94296
Michelle Humphrey –
[email protected]
(949) 366-8533
2021 - $1,924,055
City of Anaheim
Alley Sanitary Sewer Improvement
200 S Anaheim Blvd
Anaheim, CA 92805
Scott Yanagihara –
[email protected]
(714) 231-4696
2022 - $9,010,551 ($8,449,000 original bid;
plans/specs revised post-award)
State of California
Doheny State Beach Projects A, B and C
715 P Street
Sacramento, CA 95832
Ryan McBride –
[email protected]
(714) 833-1792
2022 - $88,066
Cucamonga Valley Water District
Nitrate Facility Retaining Wall
10440 Ashford St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Tyler Bui –
[email protected]
(909) 483-7455
2022 - $148,029
County of San Bernardino
Laurel Ave/Randall Ave Drainage Improvement
825 E 3rd St
San Bernardino, CA 92415
Carlos Seanez –
[email protected]
(909) 486-0227
2022 – $98,050
City of Laguna Beach
Citywide Guardrails
505 Forest Ave
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Alpha Santos-Guinto –
[email protected]
(949) 497-0729
2022 - $121,318 ($111,000 original bid; work
limits extended)
City of Orange
Chapman Ave Alley Improvement
300 E Chapman Ave
Orange, CA 92866
Karl Schmidt –
[email protected]
(714) 744-5562
1341
9277 Archibald Ave.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
off: 909.330.1128
fax: 909.330.1129
[email protected]
2022 - $1,085,610.50
City of Torrance
Citywide Sidewalk Repair for Disabled
Accessibility
3031 Torrance Blvd
Torrance, CA 90503
Marc Simons –
[email protected]
(424) 399-3193
2022 - $7,997
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Citywide Fence Repair
8794 Lion St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phillip Ortega –
[email protected]
(909) 477-2730
2022 - $206,496 ($200,010 original bid; design
revisions)
City of El Segundo
W Mariposa Ave and W Pine Ave Sidewalk
Construction
350 Main St
El Segundo, CA 90245
Floriza Rivera –
[email protected]
(310) 524-2361
2022 - $413,420
Temecula Valley Unified School District
Vintage Hills Elementary School Modernization
31350 Rancho Vista Rd
Temecula, CA 92592
Jim Flath –
[email protected]
(951) 501-9594
2022 - $5,700
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Way Finder Monument Sign Replacement
8794 Lion St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phillip Ortega –
[email protected]
(909) 477-2730
2022 - $426,472 ($508,372 original bid; some
bid schedule items deleted from work)
County of San Bernardino
Ridgecrest Rd Sidewalk and Ramps
825 E 3rd St
San Bernardino, CA 92415
Carlos Seanez –
[email protected]
(909) 486-0227
2022 - $48,606
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Calle Carabe Sidewalk Repair
8794 Lion St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Richard Favela –
[email protected]
(909) 774-4107
2022 – $128,695
City of Laguna Beach
Peppertree Parking Lot Rehabilitation
505 Forest Ave
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Alpha Santos-Guinto –
[email protected]
(949) 497-0729
1342
9277 Archibald Ave.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
off: 909.330.1128
fax: 909.330.1129
[email protected]
2022 - $529,424 ($489,075 bid value;
quantities/limits increased)
City of El Monte
Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Reconstruction
11333 Valley Blvd
El Monte, CA 91731
John Rico –
[email protected]
(626) 258-8833
2022 - $47,522 ($44,236 bid value; additional
signage added to scope)
City of El Monte
City Hall Parking Lot ADA Improvements
11333 Valley Blvd
El Monte, CA 91731
Kevin Ko –
[email protected]
(626) 580-2058
2022 - $142,591
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Heritage Community Park Pedestrian Trail
Rehabilitation
8794 Lion St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Richard Favela –
[email protected]
(909) 774-4107
2022 - $15,600
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Carnelian Block Wall Repair
8794 Lion St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Richard Favela –
[email protected]
(909) 774-4107
2022 - $8,922
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Guardrail Replacement at Woodruff and
Highland
8794 Lion St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phillip Ortega –
[email protected]
(909) 477-2730
2022 – $176,450 ($138,925 bid value;
limits/quantities increased)
City of Orange
Chapman and Yorba Sidewalk Construction
300 E Chapman Ave
Orange, CA 92866
Eric Perez –
[email protected]
(714) 744-4107
2022 - $109,208 ($99,420 bid value; scope of
work increased
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Construction of Pickleball Courts at Redhill Park
8794 Lion St
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Jenny Hanlon –
[email protected]
(909) 774-2343
1343
31 K. SUBCONTRACTORS LIST
CIP NO. 601 PROSPECT AVENUE CURB RAMPS & LONGFELLOW SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS & CIP NO. 698 ADA IMPROVEMENTS
In compliance with the "Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act" being Sections 4100-4113 of the Government Code of the State of California, and any amendments thereto, each bidder shall set forth below: (a) the name and location of the place of business, (b) the California contractor license number, (c) the DIR public works contractor registration number unless exempt pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, and (d) the portion of the work which will be done by each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the prime contractor in or about the construction of the work or improvement in an amount in excess of one-half (1/2) of one percent (1%) of the prime contractor's total bid, and shall further set forth the portion of the work which will be done by each subcontractor.

Only one subcontractor for each such portion shall be listed.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the work involves the construction of streets and highways, then the Bidder shall list each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the Bidder in or about the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the Bidder’s Total Bid Price or $10,000, whichever is greater. No additional time shall be granted to provide the below requested information.

If the contractor fails to specify a subcontractor for any portion of the work to be performed under the contract, he shall be deemed to have agreed to perform such portion himself, and he shall not be permitted to subcontract that portion of the work except under the conditions hereinafter set forth.

Subletting or subcontracting of any portion of the work to which subcontractor was designated in the original bid shall only be permitted in cases of public emergency or necessity, and then only after a finding reduced to writing as a public record of the legislative body of the Owner.

We propose to use the following listed subcontractors as per Public Contract Code Section 4100 et seq.:

List all Subcontractors. The subcontractor shall be licensed for the type of work they are performing.

Sub-Contractors Name: Address:

Description of Work: