CITY COUNCIL - January 13, 2026
1. CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM
Public Comments:
2. ROLL CALL
Public Comments:
3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Public Comments:
This Public Comment period is limited to Closed Session agenda items only. Public Comment is limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.
4. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
Public Comments:
4.a
MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on December 9, 2025 Public Comments:
4.b
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Public Comments:
City Negotiator:
Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager
Organizations:
Teamsters and Professional and Administrative Employees ("PAE") Bargaining Units
5. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Public Comments:
6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Public Comments:
7. ROLL CALL
Public Comments:
8. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Public Comments:
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS
Public Comments:
10. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Public Comments:
This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.
Recommended Action:
To approve the order of the agenda.
11. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
Public Comments:
11.a
LOCAL CONTEST WINNERS OF THE LOS ANGELES PUBLIC LIBRARY 2025 CHILDREN’S BOOKMARK CONTEST Public Comments:
11.b
ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE WINNER OF THE 16TH ANNUAL PARKING PERMIT ART CONTEST Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 11. b .pdf
12. PUBLIC COMMENT
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. eComment Report 1-13-26.pdf
Adam Morrison
I just want to understand something very simple: why is Hermosa Beach paying Ferrari money for a tricycle? We already paid a fortune to buy out the last city manager. That was mistake number one. Then this Council followed it up by hiring Steve Napolitano at an absolutely heroic salary, as if the first mistake unlocked a bonus round.
So we’re paying two city managers’ worth of money and somehow still not getting one good one. Napolitano is not even competent enough to run a children's lemonade stand.
And I have to ask, is this just slumlords helping slumlords? Is Keegan looking out for his guy? Because, from the outside, it looks less like governance and more like a group project where everyone gives each other A's while the city foots the bill.
Residents are tightening their belts. Small businesses are struggling. Hermosa Beach isn’t getting safer. It isn’t getting simpler. It isn’t getting more affordable. It’s just getting more expensive to mismanage.
So please explain why this Council thinks Napolitano's salary makes sense. Because right now, it looks like another costly mistake from a Council that’s made a habit of them.
It's time to look at getting the 3 Stooges (Saemann, Keegan, and Francois) out of office. tony against beach food & alcohohol sales
Dear City Council,
Re Parks Commission Hearing on Beach Vendors and the sale of alcohol and hot or refrigerated foods I am concerned that our Recreation Department Director sees as inevitable that special events producers will be allowed to sell VENDOR PERMITS to vendors who will then use our beaches to sell items that directly compete with local businesses.
See: https://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=0d944e78-32b3-4e26-be4a-ccd3c1dabb84&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=23&Tab=attachments i fear that without effective guardrails we are in a slippery slope that could lead to over-commercialization and the trashing of our beaches. i fear we are on a slippery slope to mini-fiestas on the beach where the vendors become the event and who then turn our beaches into county fairs, swap-meets or flea markets.
The right carefully thought policies and guardrails to protect from this should not be at the discretion of any director.
Directors come and go.
Rather guardrails must be enshrined in clear policies developed by the council & commissions whose responsibility is to represent the residents of our city; with an eye that favors resident quality of life, safety and preserving the the natural beauty and sanctity of our wonderful beaches.
If absence of clear policy and guardrails now, 10 years from now we may be asking how did we get here... just my 2 cents. im not expecting a response.
thank you for considering
tony higgins
This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate discussion, and Future Agenda Items). If public comment is provided on a Public Hearing or Municipal Matter item, public comment on the same item will not be accepted when the item is heard at a later part of the meeting.
The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker from those present in City Council Chambers and via the remote participation options listed on the agenda. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council.
No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the public will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard.
13. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Public Comments:
14. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
Public Comments:
This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives.
15. CONSENT CALENDAR
Public Comments:
The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period.
Recommended Action:
To approve the consent calendar.
15.a
WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Public Comments:
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
15.b
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Attachment 1. December 9, 2025 Regular Meeting.pdf
2. Attachment 2. June 11, 2024 Special City Council Meeting (Interviews).pdf
3. Attachment 3. July 11, 2024 Special City Council Meeting .pdf (City Clerk Myra Maravilla)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council approve the minutes of the December 9, 2025 regular meeting, and June 11, 2024 special meetings.
15.c
CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-008
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CHECK REGISTERS 1-13-2026 - 26-AS-008.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Check Register 11-25-25.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Check Register 12-3-25.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Check Register 12-10-25.pdf
5. Attachment 4. Check Register 12-18-25.pdf
6. Attachment 5. Check Register 12-23-25.pdf
7. Attachment 6. Check Register 12-31-25.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for November 25, 2025 through December 31, 2025. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.
15.d
CASH BALANCE REPORT - 26-AS-006
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - OCTOBER 2025 CASH BALANCE REPORTS - 26-AS-006.pdf
2. Attachment 1. October 2025 Cash Balance Report.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the October 2025 Cash Balance Report.
15.e
REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR OCTOBER 2025 - 26-AS-005 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - OCTOBER 2025 REVENUE, EXPENDITURE, AND CIP REPORTS - 26-AS-005.pdf
2. Attachment 1. October 2025 Revenue Report.pdf
3. Attachment 2. October 2025 Expenditure Report.pdf
4. Attachment 3. October 2025 CIP Report by Project.pdf (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the October 2025 Financial Reports.
15.f
ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY’S RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM - 26-AS-009 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ADOPT A RESOLUTION FOR NEW PARKING PERMIT RULES - 26-AS-009.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Draft Resolution (Updated on 1-12-26).pdf (Revenue Services Supervisor Paul Avila)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution adopting the provisions of the City’s Residential Parking Permit Program.
15.g
CITY’S TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-007
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - NOVEMBER 2025 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - 26-AS-007.pdf
2. Attachment 1. November 2025 City Treasurer's Report.pdf (City Treasurer Dave Pedersen)
Recommended Action:
The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the November 2025 City Treasurer’s Report.
15.h
REPORT ON RECENT ACTIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR POSSIBLE DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF CALL UP DE NOVO REVIEW UNDER HBMC SECTION 2.52.040 - 26-CDD-006 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 26-CDD-006.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Planning Commission Action Minutes of December 16, 2025.pdf (Community Development Director
Alison Becker
)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission Special Meeting of December 16, 2026.
15.i
APPROVAL OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF LONG-TERM AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS FOR HOPE CHAPEL PICNIC - 26-CR-002 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CONSIDERATION OF LTA FOR HOPE CHAPEL - 26-CR-002.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Hope Chapel LTA Application.pdf
(Special Events and Filming Coordinator Austin DeWeese) Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council approve the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission’s recommendation for staff to commence long-term agreement negotiations with Hope Chapel for the Hope Chapel Picnic in 2026 through 2028.
15.j
APPROVAL OF LONG-TERM AGREEMENTS FOR THE AAU HERMOSA BEACH CHAMPIONSHIPS, AAU HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BEACH VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE MATCHES, AND AAU SOUTHERN GRAND PRIX SERIES, AVP JUNIOR NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND JVA/BVCA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS - 26-CR-003 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - AAU AVP JVABVCA LTA - 26-CR-003.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Proposed LTA with AAU.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Proposed LTA with AVP.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Proposed LTA with JVABVCA.pdf
5. Attachment 4. 2026 Special Events Calendar.pdf
6. Attachment 5. 2027 Special Events Calendar.pdf
(Community Resources Director Lisa Nichols)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Approve long-term agreements (LTA) with the following organizations for the following special events on the dates listed in each LTA in 2026 and 2027, with an option, at staff’s discretion, to extend the LTA for an additional one-year term for each organization’s special events in 2028 on dates to be determined:
Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) for the AAU Hermosa Beach Championships, AAU High School Boys Beach Volleyball League Matches, and AAU Southern Grand Prix Series; Association of Volleyball Professionals (AVP) for the AVP Junior National Championships; and Junior Volleyball Association (JVA)/Beach Volleyball Clubs of America (BVCA) for the JVA/BVCA National Championships; and Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest to each LTA, subject to approval by the City Attorney.
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M
Public Comments:
16.a
INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION 17.08.020 (D) OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO HOME OCCUPATIONS (CITYWIDE). - 26-CDD-002 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AMENDING SUBSECTION 17.08.020 (D) OF THE HBMC - 26-CDD-002.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Draft Ordinance Amending HBMC 17.08.020 (D) – Home Occupations.pdf
3. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 16. a.pdf
CEQA:
Determine the ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines (Common Sense Exception). (Community Development Director Alison Becker)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Determine the ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines (Common Sense Exception); Conduct a public hearing to consider amending subsection 17.08.020 (D) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to Home Occupations (Citywide); and Introduce by title only and waive first reading of an Ordinance of the City of the Hermosa Beach approving Zoning Text Amenment (TA25-04) pertaining to Home Occupations (Attachment 1)
.
17. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
Public Comments:
17.a
AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CITY YARD PROJECT OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES - 25-PW-086 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - AWARD OF PSA FOR CITY YARD PROJECT OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES - 25-PW-086.pdf
2. Attachment 1. RFQ 25-006 City Yard Project Owner's Representative Services.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Cumming Group Statement of Qualifications.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Proposed Professional Services Agreement with Cumming Group.pdf
5. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. a.pdf
tony higgins - replaces earlier post
NOTE: this replaces earlier post on this topic
Dear City Council
Re 1/13 Hb City Yard CCM Agenda Item 17a
The Hb city yard redesign is a 20-30 million dollar project that is a bellweather of whether of the city staff and leadership now have the skills necessary to effectively streamline and prioritize the estimated 160 million in unfunded & backlogged capital projects coming up by 2031 and deliver them on-time and on-budget; and frankly it could look better.
After 7 years of unexplained delays, while we are finally on the cusp of hiring a construction manager and that's progress, but we still dont have answers to even the most basic questions including:
1) What is the target date for when the city yard requirements be fully defined?
2) What is the target date for when the budgetary estimates consistent with these requirements be completed?
3 What is the target date for when a funding plan be approved? It has been under the stewardship of Director SanClemente for ~4 years.
The city yard was designated a high priority project by the city council ~ 3 years ago. At the time Councilman Jackson said it was his highest priority infrastructure project.
But the buck stops with Napolitano AND if after 7 months under Steve Napolitano's leadership city staff still cant answer these three basic questions; it is cause for concern.
I believe the public expects two other things going forward:
1. To have answers to the above questions; seven years it too long to wait and these types of delays dont inspire confidence that the city can pull off even larger infrastructure projects like the City Hall on time & on budget
AND
To be presented with a well defined project plan and accurate budget estimates in the next 6 months and be reassured that heads will roll if the council and our residents are again are blindsided by missed deliverables or cost overruns
end
tony for long overdue plan
Dear City Council,
After 7 years the city should have a City Yard plan that can at least answer the 3 basic questions below. 1) What is the target date for when the city yard requirements be fully defined?
2) What is the target date for when the budgetary estimates consistent with these requirements be completed?
3 What is the target date for when a funding plan be approved? This project has been on the books for 7 years.
It has been under the stewardship of Director SanClemente for ~4 years.
The city yard was designated a high priority project by the city council ~ 3 years ago. At the time Councilman Jackson said it was his highest priority infrastructure project.
But the buck stops with Napolitano AND if after 7 months under Steve Napolitano's leadership city staff still cant answer these 3 basic questions; it is cause for concern. thank you for considering
tonyhiggins
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Award a contract for City Yard owner’s representative services to Cumming Management Group, Inc. at a not-to-exceed amount of $565,000 for a term of four years ending January 13, 2030 (Attachment
3 )
;
and
Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the proposed agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney.
17.b
APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. - 26-PD-004 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CROSSING GUARDS - 26-PD-004.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Proposed First Amendment to Agreement with All City Management Services for Crossing Guard Services.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Signed Agreement with All City Management Services Inc(1).pdf
4. Attachment 3. Supplemental Information - Crossing Guard Survey Results.pdf
5. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. b.pdf
(Police Chief Landon Phillips)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Approve the proposed first amendment to agreement with All City Management Services, Inc., to provide crossing guard services at an additional location at 5 th
Street and Pacific Coast Highway to increase the not-to-exceed amount by $46,394, resulting in a total not-to-exceed amount of $686,461 (Attachment 1
)
;
Appropriate $23,197 for the first-year amendment in the Proposition C Fund 146 to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Budget; and Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the proposed first amendment, subject to approval by the City Attorney.
17.c
ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO RECLASSIFY AND AMEND THE SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT FOR THE RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION, APPROVE REVISED SALARY SCHEDULE, AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS - 26-AS-001 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CONSIDERATION OF RECLASSIFICATION OF RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION - 26-AS-001.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Risk Program Manager – Classification Specification.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Draft Resolution to Amend Salary and Benefits Report for Unrepresented Classifications.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Revised Salary Schedule, Effective 1-14-26.pdf
5. Attachment 4. Draft Resolution to Reclassify Risk Management Position.pdf
6. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. c.pdf
Ira Ellman
Just a note regarding the Risk Management Analyst position: At the December 1, 2025 Civil Service Board meeting (I am a member) we were only asked to review and approve the reclassification of "Risk Management Analyst" to "Risk Program Manger" and also approve the Risk Program Manager class specifications (including definitions, example of duties, qualification guidelines, physical demands and working environment). We were not requested to review or approve the "Salary Schedule" or any information regarding step increases, performance bonuses, deferred compensation, educational allowances, etc. I assume this was normal protocol.
Laura Pena
Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff – I find it increasingly important that the City’s performance accountability and transparency around compensation evolve at the same pace. Without that balance, well intentioned adjustments can unintentionally create long term fiscal exposure and erode public confidence in how compensation decisions are made.
My comments are not intended to oppose reclassification or fair pay. Rather, they are offered to ensure that compensation growth remains outcome driven, and clearly connected to public value, particularly as these costs are related to pension and benefit obligations that extend far beyond the current budget cycle.
Based on the attached reports, I've noticed the following:
• Step increases occur annually and are effectively automatic for employees rated “meeting expectations.” • Merit bonuses of up to 5% are available bi annually, with eligibility beginning at as little as 20% goal completion. • Merit pay is PERS reportable, and base salary tables are adjusted upward to reflect assumed bonus participation. • Performance goals are established internally between supervisors and employees, without Council level reporting or public visibility. It has been challenging to find how performance measures are tied to strategic goals.
Individually, each of these elements may be appropriate. Collectively, however, they create compounding compensation growth without a clear path for Council or the public to evaluate whether that growth is producing measurable improvements in outcomes such as operational efficiency, resident/business satisfaction or cost avoidance.
I respectfully offer the following refinements, many of which could be implemented without reopening compensation agreements:
1. Differentiate Retention Adjustments From Performance Rewards. Reclassification and market adjustments are meant to support recruitment and retention. Merit bonuses should remain truly exceptional and tied to outcomes that exceed baseline job performance, rather than functioning as a routine supplement layered on top of automatic increases.
2. Raise the Threshold for Merit Bonuses. When partial goal completion qualifies as “superior performance,” incentives risk losing credibility. Consider establishing higher minimum thresholds such as 70–80% goal achievement before bonuses are awarded, particularly at higher bonus levels.
3. Provide Annual, High Level Performance Reporting to Council. Without reviewing individual personnel matters, Council could receive an annual summary showing:
• The number of bonuses awarded by classification
• Average bonus percentages
• General categories of outcomes achieved (e.g., claims reduction, training completion, satisfaction surveys) This level of transparency would reinforce public confidence that bonuses are tied to results, not expectations.
4. Revisit the Role of Step Increases at Higher Levels. Automatic step increases tied solely to tenure can unintentionally weaken performance management. Consider whether progression at higher steps should require demonstrated skill development, certification, or outcomes aligned with departmental or Citywide objectives.
5. Model Long Term Fiscal Impacts of Layered Compensation Growth. Because bonuses and salary increases affect pension and benefit liabilities, I encourage the City to periodically present multi-year projections illustrating how these policies affect long term costs, particularly as future revenue measures or service tradeoffs are considered.
We all benefit from dedicated staff and competitive compensation is essential. At the same time, public trust depends on the City’s ability to clearly explain not just why compensation increases are granted, but what the community receives in return. In doing so, we can build the confidence necessary for residents to support future investments whether through taxes or bonds.
As always, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration.
Laura Pena
(Interim Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Adopt a Resolution to reclassify the Risk Management Analyst position to Risk Program Manager (Attachment 4)
;
Approve the revised Salary Schedule
(Attachment 3)
;
Adopt a Resolution to amend the Salary and Benefits Report for Unrepresented Classifications (Attachment 2)
; and
Appropriate $22,500 to the Insurance Fund for the reclassification of the Risk Program Manager for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2025-26.
17.d
PART-TIME TEMPORARY SALARY SCHEDULE UPDATE - 26-AS-003
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - PART-TIME TEMPORARY SALARY SCHEDULE UPDATE - 26-AS-003.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Resolution to Adopt the Part-Time Temporary Employee Wage Rates Schedule.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Updated Temporary Employee Wage Rates Schedule.pdf
4. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. d.pdf
(Interim Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council adopt a Resolution to amend the Temporary Employee Hourly Wage Rates, Effective January 1, 2026 (Attachment 2)
.
17.e
APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT HALF, INC. TO PROVIDE AS-NEEDED STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES CITYWIDE - 26-AS-002 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - TEMP STAFFING - 26-AS-002.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Professional Services Agreement - Robert Half, Inc.pdf
3. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. e.pdf
Claudia Berman
The city has recently experienced vacancies in the HR Manager and HR analyst positions, and the recently hired HR Analyst (09/25 - per LinkedIn) is now the Interim HR Manager. It is also my understanding that the city clerk is leaving, and an analyst in the city manager’s office has also resigned.
While the $500K is reportedly funded by vacancy savings, the size of this expenditure and lack of detail in the staff report warrant clarification:
Scope & Timeline:
1. How much of the $500K addresses internal vacancies versus staff augmentation? Which departments and positions?
2. What is the recruitment timeline for vacant positions? At what point does temp staffing cost more than the vacancy savings?
3. Will there be overlap between temp staff and new permanent hires for transition purposes?
4. What "special projects" mentioned in the staff report require temporary staffing?
5. What is the projected monthly burn rate for this contract? Procurement & Accountability:
6. Which other agencies were contacted, and why were they deemed unqualified?
7. Can you provide a statement of work for the initial services to be rendered? Without an RFP, the staff report lacks specifics.
8. What services has Robert Half previously provided to Hermosa Beach, and what were those contract amounts?
9. Does any portion of this expenditure cover functions previously performed by the Deputy City Manager position that was eliminated by Saemann, Francois, and Keegan? If so, how does this impact the claimed savings from that elimination? Typically, one of the functions of a DCM is to assist during staffing shortages.
Reporting:
10. Can staff provide monthly reports to Council showing: number of temps by department, amount spent, and permanent recruitment status for each vacancy? Thank you for listening!
(Interim Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Approve an agreement with Robert Half, Inc to provide as-needed temporary staff augmentation services citywide through a cooperative purchasing agreement with Robert Half, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $500,000.
Authorize the City Attorney to authorize modifications to the proposed agreement, if needed; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed agreement, with the City Clerk attesting the proposed agreements, subject to approval by the City Attorney.
17.f
INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 2.20 COMMUNITY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, 2.28 PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY DEPARTMENT, AND 12.30 SPECIAL EVENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY - 26-CR-007 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - AMENDMENTS TO HBMC FOR DEPARTMENT NAME CHANGE - 26-CR-007.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Proposed Ordinance.pdf
3. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. f.pdf
(Community Resources Director Lisa Nichols)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council introduce by title only and waive the first reading of an ordinance amending Chapters 2.20, 2.28, and 12.30 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to Update the Title of the Community Resources Department and Determing the Ordinance is Not a Project Under the Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).
17.g
ADOPT A RESOLUTION AND AUTHORIZE CHANGE ORDER FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CIP 699 PARKING LOT C STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS - 26-PW-002 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - 1ST AMENDMENT TO SLATER WATERPROOFING INC. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - CIP 699 - 26-PW-002.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Resolution Approving Amendment No. 1 to Slater Waterproofing Contract.pdf
3. Attachment 2. CIP 699 Contract Signed.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Amendment No. 1 to Slater Waterproofing Construction Contract.pdf
5. Attachment 4. Amendment No. 1 to Slater Waterproofing Contract - Exhibit A-1 .pdf
6. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. g.pdf
CEQA:
Determine that CIP 699, Parking Lot C Structure Improvements, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(Existing Facilities). The proposed project scope involves functional improvements to the existing parking structure. (City Engineer Saad Malim)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Determine that CIP 699, Parking Lot C Structure Improvements, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(Existing Facilities).
Adopt a resolution authorizing an increase of $240,873, to fund the construction contract change order with Slater Waterproofing, Inc. for a total current authorization of $2,243,415 for CIP 699 Parking Lot C Structure Improvements ( Attachment 1
);
Approve an appropriation of $151,957 to CIP 699 Parking Lot C Structure Improvements in the Capital Improvement Project fund for the proposed change order from remaining CIP 603 funds; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment to the proposed contract, and approve minor modifications if necessary, and the City Clerk to attest, subject to approval by the City Attorney (Attachment
3 ).
17.h
INFORMATIONAL ITEM REGARDING FEES FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-001 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ENCROACHMENT FEE INFO ITEM - 26-CMO-001.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Outdoor Encroachment Areas - October 2025 by Location Type.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Fee Log.pdf
4. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. h.pdf
Informational item supported by Councilmember Keegan and Mayor Saemann (Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council receive and file this Informational Item regarding commercial encroachment fees.
17.i
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR A BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS HANDBOOK - 26-CCO-001 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - COMMISSION HANDBOOK - 26-CCO-001.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Boards and Commissions Handbook.pdf
3. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 17. i.pdf
Kathy Dunbabin
As a resident and Public Works Commission member I think it is time and important that Hermosa Beach has a Boards and Commissions Handbook.
However I would clarify...With exception of staff and staff directory updates, the City Council should approve all other updates. (p. 32 Handbook Review and Updates) Thanks.
David Pedersen
While I did not read the proposed handbook in detail, I do think that this is a worthy effort. Many that become commissioners are already well-versed in the public process, but no one would accuse us of overcommunication in terms of the nuts and bolts of these roles. I think this is a step in the right direction.
Sincerely, David Pedersen
City Treasurer and former Planning Commissioner
David Grethen
(1) The hard requirement that "Commissioners ARE NOT PERMITTED to speak during City Council meetings on topics that have come before their commission" should be changed to a policy that "Commissioners SHOULD NOT speak during City Council meetings on topics that have come before their commission". The allowance for phone calls or emails to Council is inadequate because it cannot anticipate what may be stated during the meeting and would not be heard by all. While I appreciate the intent of this restriction and do not advocate for disruption, a guardrail should be in place in the unlikely event that Staff mistakenly misrepresents or inadequately conveys the Commission meeting events and outcomes. (2) It seems like Council should have to approve updates to the document, not just allow changes by the Clerk with City Manager and Attorney approval. (3) I do not see City attorney concurrence listed anywhere in the Staff report.
Todd Tullis
As a recent commission appointee, the lack of written orientation information was a bit frustrating. The draft handbook should be further edited to include legal citations (for clarity/accuracy), to remove unnecessary content (to make it easier to read), and to remove content that is subject to change (to reduce maintenance burden). I have suggested several such edits in red in the attached (please ignore black lines on pgs 16 & 17). tonyhiggins edit
please click on file above and ignore earlier pdf
thanks
tonyhiggins
Please see comment by clicking on above file.
thanks
(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends City Council:
Approve the Boards and Commissions Handbook
(Attachment 1
)
;
Provide direction on a new live scan or background check requirement for newly appointed commissioners; and Provide direction on requiring a sexual harassment prevention training for all commissioners.
18. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Public Comments:
This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only.
18.a
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-003
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA 1-13-26 - 26-CMO-003.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Tentative Future Agenda.pdf
Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.
19. CITY MANAGER REPORT
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for item 19.pdf
20. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Public Comments:
This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken.
20.a
PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Action Minutes of the December 2, 2025 Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission Meeting.pdf (Office Assistant Amari Gilbert)
20.b
PARKING CITATION AND REVENUE REPORT—DECEMBER 2025
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Parking Citation and Revenue Report - December 2025.pdf (Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales)
21. ADJOURNMENT
Public Comments: