CITY COUNCIL - April 28, 2026
1. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Public Comments:
Mayor Detoy called the Open Session to order at 6:25 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Public Comments:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by U.S. Women's National Ice Hockey Team Head Coach John Wroblewski.
3. ROLL CALL
Public Comments:
City Clerk Martha Alvarez led roll call.
Present:
Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Public Comments:
There was no closed session.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS
Public Comments:
Councilmember Saemann announced the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club’s 100th birthday celebration on May 9, 2026, at noon at 2515 Valley Drive, noting it will be a community celebration rather than a fundraiser and would include music, food, and prizes.
Councilmember Francois announced his next Community Forum for Monday, May 4, 2026, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., describing it as an informal public discussion with refreshments.
Mayor Detoy announced that Hermosa Beach Little League’s annual Night in the Ballpark would take place Saturday, May 2, 2026, beginning at 5:00 p.m. at Clark Field.
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Public Comments:
This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Saemann
Motion to approve the agenda.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
7. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
Public Comments:
7.a
RECOGNIZING U.S. WOMEN’S NATIONAL ICE HOCKEY TEAM HEAD COACH JOHN WROBLEWSKI Public Comments:
Mayor Detoy on behalf of the City Council presented a proclamation of recognition to U.S. Women's National Ice Hockey Team Head Coach and Hermosa Beach resident, John Wroblewski. Mayor Detoy further noted that John lead the U.S. Women's National Ice Hockey Team to a gold medal in the 2026 Winter Olympics and for his broader achievements in international hockey. Also highlighted the recipients local involvement as a Little League father and coach.
7.b
RECOGNIZING HERMOSA BEACH KIWANIS CLUB FOR 100 YEARS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. SUPPLEMENTAL Flyer for Item 7.b.pdf
Mayor Detoy and Councilmember Saemann on behalf of the City Council presented a proclamation of recognition to the Hermosa Beach Kiwanis Club for 100 years of service to the community. The Mayor noted the club’s long history in Hermosa Beach, its support for youth and community causes, and the significance of its centennial.
Lieutenant Governor for Kiwanis International Division 19 Richard Tyler, accepted the proclamation and presented the City of Hermosa Beach with a certificate of appreciation for 100 years of collaboration and support of the Kiwanis Club’s mission.
8. PUBLIC COMMENT
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. ecomment report 4-28-26 .pdf
Claudia Berman
REQUEST: Restore Key Documents on City Website Pertaining to Civic Facilities. Detail in attached PDF. Thank you for considering this request. tonyhiggins
Dear City Council.
RE: Chamber of Commerce promotion of Illegal tackle football special event during the upcoming Memorial Day Fiesta:
I have been told by city officials to be patient; this issue will be addressed in the upcoming 4/28 City Council meeting. i want to be clear about the issue. For me personally, the issue seems to be less the number of people expected to attend the event and more the chambers willingness to promote this obviously illegal event on social media.
I think this incident needs to be viewed in the context of whether we put the Fiestas event promoter out to bid for thr reasons John Burry suggested in his public comments during the 4/14 CCM but i admit thats above my paygrade.
I think this incident needs to be viewed in the context of whether we put the Fiestas event promoter out to bid for thr reasons John Burry suggested in his public comments during the 4/14 CCM but i admit that decision is above my paygrade.
But i hope you squarely address John's comments below about putting the Fiesta and New Years event promotions out to bid. And while your at it consider why please consider that the BBK Law City Attorney contract hasnt been put out to bid since 1996, 30 years ago. Our fiscal challenges require new ways of doing business and demand we get the best value from our city contracts.
Anyway, back to bidding out Fiesta and New Years event promotions.
John Burry:
I think we do need a transparent RFP process for the production of the parade and the fiesta, possibly even a New Year's event next year.
Before this Council deepens its financial exposure to the Chamber, it's worth looking at how the Chamber's managed its own resources.
In '24, it lost $125,000 on its operating activities. Its total assets declined by $150,000. In the same year, it paid $249,000 in compensation, $60,000 more than the prior year. It then spent $37,000 last year on consultants for a TID proposal that they abandoned before securing even basic hotel buy-in. It pays almost $50,000 a year to service an office on Pier Avenue that's unstaffed on weekends, holidays, and Mondays.
This isn't the financial profile of an organization that should just be handed a no-bid contract over events that have real commercial value, not when the city is facing such a tough fiscal outlook. In real terms, the Chamber lost somewhere between $150,000 and $190,000 last year, and there's a deeper issue.
The Chamber's primary purpose is to advocate for the interests of the business community—to show up at hearings, engage with policy, and represent local businesses before this council. That doesn't have to require a large budget, but it does require knowledge, expertise, relationships, and commitment.
This chamber has become so consumed by event logistics that it can't fulfill that core function properly.
Separating event production from the chamber wouldn't weaken it; it would free it to do more of what a chamber is actually supposed to do. Fiesta generates real revenue. Those production rights have economic value and should be allocated through an open and competitive process, not grandfathered to an organization that is burning through its reserves at an alarming rate while being subsidized by taxpayers and fee waivers.
If they absolutely insist on pursuing an event strategy, and they submit a compelling proposal, they should have every opportunity to win on merit. That's the purpose of an RFP.
The best way to protect these events that the community loves is to ensure that they're produced by whoever is genuinely best positioned to deliver them. Don't miss that opportunity in 2027.
It's unlikely that any third party would want to bid for the parade alone. It would need to be coupled to Fiesta to be a commercial proposition, but together, they could generate a meaningful profit share with a third party for the city. Thank you. -----------
Thank You for considering
tonyhiggins
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Ira E. - Public Records Requests and City survey (In-Person) Carla Buck - Dog Park (Virtual)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
9. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Public Comments:
Mayor Detoy asked for clarification regarding the City survey.
City Manager Steve Napolitano provided an update and confirmed that the results will return at a future City Council meeting.
10. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
Public Comments:
This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives.
Councilmember Dean Francois reported that he had attended the South Bay Cities Sanitation District Board meeting two weeks earlier. He noted that rate increases would be discussed at the next meeting and stated that he would advocate against an increase if possible, though he indicated that an increase appeared likely.
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
Public Comments:
Councilmember Francois requested a "No" Vote under Agenda Item No. 11.j, concerning vending on public beaches. He stated that while he had supported limited vending related to specific events such as volleyball tournaments, he opposed opening vending to all beach events and believed the policy was inconsistent with the spirit of the Coastal Act.
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
Motion to approve the Consent Calendar and register a "No" Vote under Agenda Item No. 11.j, for Councilmember Francois.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
11.a
WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Public Comments:
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
Motion Carried
11.b
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. April 14, 2026 Regular Meeting.pdf
(City Clerk Martha Alvarez)
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To approve the minutes of the April 14, 2026 regular meeting.
Motion Carried
11.c
CASH BALANCE REPORT - 26-AS-047
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - JANUARY 2026 AND FEBRUARY 2026 CASH BALANCE REPORTS - 26-AS-047.pdf
2. Attachment 1. January 2026 Cash Balance Report.pdf
3. Attachment 2. February 2026 Cash Balance Report.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To receive and file the January 2026 and February 2026 Cash Balance Reports.
Motion Carried
11.d
CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-048
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - MARCH 2026 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - 26-AS-048.pdf
2. Attachment 1. March 2026 Treasurer's Report.pdf
(City Treasurer Dave Pedersen)
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To receive and file the March 2026 City Treasurer’s Report.
Motion Carried
11.e
APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH NETRIX, LLC. FOR DATA BACK-UP SERVICES - 26-CMO-022 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH NETRIX LLC FOR DATA BACK UP SERVICES - 26-CMO-022.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Agreement with Netrix LLC for Data Back-Up Services with Exhibit A.pdf (GIS/IT Analyst Alex Hildebrand).
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To approve an agreement with Netrix, LLC. for data back-up services for a three-year term for a total not-exceed-amount of $121,742; and authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed agreement, approve minor modifications if necessary, with the City Clerk attesting the attached agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney.
Motion Carried
11.f
REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2026 - 26-AS-049 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT- REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT FOR JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2026 - 26-AS-049.pdf
2. Attachment 1. January 2026 Revenue Report.pdf
3. Attachment 2. January 2026 Expenditure Report.pdf
4. Attachment 3. January 2026 CIP Report by Project.pdf
5. Attachment 4. February 2026 Revenue Report.pdf
6. Attachment 5. February 2026 Expenditure Report.pdf
7. Attachment 6. February 2026 CIP Report by Project.pdf (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To receive and file the January and February 2026 Financial Reports.
Motion Carried
11.g
CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-050
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CHECK REGISTERS 4-28-2026 - 26-AS-050.pdf
2. Attachment 1. 4-8-26.pdf
3. Attachment 2. 4-16-26.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To receive and file the check registers for April 8, 2026 through April 16, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.
Motion Carried
11.h
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF April 16, 2026 - 26-PW-021 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CIP STATUS REPORT APR 2026 - 26-PW-021.pdf
2. Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of April 16, 2026.pdf
3. Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 – Updated April 16, 2026.pdf (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of April 16, 2026.
Motion Carried
11.i
RATIFY LETTER OF SUPPORT IF AMENDED FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 2741 HOUSING ELEMENT: INVENTORY OF LAND: SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE - 26-CMO-023 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - AB 2741 - 26-CMO-023.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Letter of Support if Amended for AB 2741.pdf (Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo)
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To ratify a letter of support if amended for Assembly Bill 2741 sent on April 20, 2026.
Motion Carried
11.j
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.30 (SPECIAL EVENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY) AND SECTION 12.20.300 (SOLICITATION) OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE - 26-PR-023 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - SECOND READING VENDOR SPECIAL EVENTS - 26-PR-023.pdf
2. Proposed Ordinance.pdf
CEQA:
The proposed ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378 (b)(5) as it is an organization or administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)
The recommendation for this item was approved on the Consent Calendar by Majority Vote with Councilmember Francois registering a "No" Vote.
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
To determine that the proposed ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), as it constitutes an organizational or administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; waive full reading and adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 12.30 (Special Events on Public Property) and Section 12.20.300 (Solicitation) of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code to allow for the sale of prepared food, nonalcoholic beverages, and/or merchandise on the beach by special event-associated vendors; and direct the City Clerk to publish a summary of the ordinance.
Ayes (4)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Noes (1)
Councilmember Francois
Motion Carried
12. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M
Public Comments:
12.a
PUBLIC HEARING-RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-025 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT-PUBLIC HEARING FOR FEE STUDY UPDATES - 26-AS-025.pdf
2. Attachment 1. - Draft Fee Resolution.pdf
3. Attachment 2. PROPOSED FEE CHANGES.pdf
4. Attachment 3. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH FEE STUDY.pdf
5. Attachment 4. CURRENT MASTER FEE AND CHARGES SCHEDULE.pdf
6. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 12.a.pdf
7. SUPPLEMENTAL Emailed Comments for Item 12.a.pdf
8. SUPPLEMENTAL Emailed Comment for Item 12.a.pdf
Nancy Schwappach
I agreed with others, this is a lot of information and the report (which I only skimmed) seems to ask more questions than it answers.
I reviewed the Manhattan Beach fee schedule for a "gut check." It indicates full cost recovery unless Council as a policy matter agreed to a subsidy (eg solar panels).
If the proposed new Community Development fees are "out of market" at full cost recovery, I agree with Jon David - we may have an efficiency issue, not a fee issue.
As for the Community Services/Parks & Rec fees, event fees should, it seems to me, provide 100% reimbursement unless Council agrees on a subsidy either per event or for class of events (eg, events run by not for profits). If we cannot recover the full cost of hosting events, perhaps we should get out of the event hosting business.
As for community programs (after school, camps, theatre, etc) - again it seems these should be on a full cost recovery basis, except where council has approved subsidies.
I think this all needs more study and suggest it be continued to a different time.
Thank you for your consideration.
Laura Pena
Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff —
The User Fee Study was helpful because it broke down the cost of each service and explains why cost recovery matters given the City’s fiscal outlook. However, while the study answers, “What does this service cost?” it does not fully ask the equally important question: “Should this service cost that much in the first place?” If a process is costly because it is legally required, complex, and staff intensive, cost recovery may be appropriate. But if it is costly because it is outdated, duplicative, manual, hard to track, or inefficient, moving too quickly to full cost recovery risks making residents, businesses, and applicants pay more for inefficiencies built into the system.
This is especially concerning when some fees are proposed to double or triple, while applicants also pay a 7% technology fee. My understanding is that we still do not have a fully functioning public facing Accela portal that allows applicants to track most applications. If the public is being asked to pay more, what data shows that service quality, transparency, processing times, and customer experience have improved? Before adopting major increases, I respectfully ask Council and staff to address:
1. What measurable service improvements will applicants receive?
2. What are the current processing times and review cycles by application type?
3. Has Council received the customer service survey results regarding department performance and applicant concerns?
4. How has that feedback been used to improve Community Development and Public Works?
5. How is the City measuring whether Accela and other technology investments are reducing staff time and improving transparency? I am also concerned about applying “full business costing” without a parallel efficiency review. The study allocates costs for Departmental Administration, including support functions that do not provide direct end-user deliverables. That may be appropriate accounting, but it raises a policy question: how do we know applicants are paying for efficient support functions rather than absorbing more internal administrative burden? In the 2022–23 budget, the City allocated $100,000 for a citywide internal audit program focused on best management practices and cost efficient service delivery. Before asking the public to pay substantially higher fees, it would be helpful to know what improvements were identified and measured.
The fee study notes that some market sensitive fees are not primarily about revenue recovery; they are about encouraging or discouraging behavior. That principle should apply more broadly to fees affecting private investment, small business expansion, tenant improvements, adaptive reuse, housing production, and reinvestment.
If fees are raised too high too quickly, the City may generate short term fee revenue while discouraging long term tax base growth. Our long term budget strategy depends on economic activity, not just higher fees.
I support moving new construction fees from valuation based to square footage based, which appears more equitable and predictable. But investment related fees should also be treated carefully because private investment is sensitive to market conditions.
One question the fee study asks in the Community Resources context should be asked citywide: Is there a less costly way for the City to supply the service? I respectfully recommend that Council consider a phased and tiered approach before adopting the full rate increases. The study recommends that Council review suggested recovery rates to determine how much of each service should be recovered through fees and how much should be subsidized through tax dollars. That policy review should occur before full implementation.
A stronger approach would be to review process efficiencies, define a public benefit and cost-recovery policy framework, preserve targeted subsidies where fees support participation, compliance, small business activity, housing, or community benefit, phase in significant increases, and measure whether service quality actually improves.
The City should not charge small, predictable projects the same base process fee as larger, more complex projects. A minor tenant improvement, adaptive reuse project, two-unit condo, or straightforward business review should not be treated the same as a major discretionary development.
Full cost should inform policy; it should not replace policy.
As always, I appreciate your consideration.
Laura Pena
Michelle Crispin
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on the City’s fee study and for the thoughtful work that has gone into its development.
We respectfully offer these perspectives on behalf of Hermosa Beach’s business community to support a balanced approach that considers both fiscal needs and economic vitality.
First, the scale and timing of the proposed increases may create barriers for small businesses, startups, and those operating on tight margins. Even incremental cost increases can impact decisions to open, expand, or remain in Hermosa Beach.
Second, we encourage the City to prioritize streamlining administrative processes before implementing significant fee increases. Improving efficiency and reducing processing time can help lower costs while also enhancing the experience for businesses and residents.
Third, we recommend a phased approach to implementation. Gradual adjustments, combined with clear communication and adequate notice, will allow businesses to plan and adapt while giving the City an opportunity to evaluate impacts and incorporate community input.
The Chamber stands ready to partner with the City on outreach and engagement to support a thoughtful transition that meets fiscal goals while sustaining a strong local economy.
Jon David
Please read the attached PDF.
adam malovani
I appreciate and applaud the City’s accomplishment in streamlining the Temporary Minor Special Event Permit application in 2025 (ref. Item S-033 on the Master Fee Schedule). Reducing the application from approximately twelve pages to a simple two-page format (see attached) is a meaningful improvement that should significantly reduce the time required for both applicants and City staff.
However, the proposed Fee Schedule indicates that it takes 12 hours of staff time to process each permit application, resulting in a fee increase from $621 to $2,102 based on an hourly rate of $175. This estimate appears to reflect the previous, more complex application and review process rather than the newly streamlined version.
I respectfully ask City staff to re-evaluate the assumed processing time and corresponding fee in light of the updated, simplified application. Based on the current format, it seems reasonable that processing time would be substantially lower—potentially closer to one hour for standard applications, and even less for repeat events that have already been reviewed and approved.
The City’s success in simplifying this Minor Event permit application and review process could be used as an example for creating a more efficient and equitable system for both applicants and the City.
Thank you for your consideration.
Todd Tullis
City clearly needs to cover more of its costs, and the output of this study is quite dense and detailed. Hopefully this is not the only time for the community to provide input and for council to consider which city services should be subsidized and to what degree. Increasing the costs of doing business in town is a broad community concern. Have process or technology changes to lower costs been considered/evaluated? Suggest discussing in detail the biggest impact items to drive more community feedback:
- Park & Rec analysis and recommendations should be prioritized for evaluation as it has the largest deficit by dollar amount. Theater Services $500k, Special Event Permits $350k, Summer Camp $225k & Afterschool Programs $150k - Public Safety - Animal Control Services $500k - is such a large deficit here typical? - Community Development - Building Plan Check/Inspection $630k, General Plan Maintenance $145k tonyhiggins
Please click on pdf link. thanks
Raymond Dussault
Dear City Council:
I understand the City’s budget challenges and appreciate the effort to place Hermosa Beach on a stronger fiscal foundation. I also recognize the work being done to make the City more business-friendly and to attract and retain quality businesses.
That said, there are several items in this proposal that need deeper consideration—not because they are necessarily wrong, but because if implemented too quickly, they could create unintended consequences that take years to correct and risk setting the City back from the progress made over the past year.
For example, the proposed CUP annual monitoring fee appears to create a new review cadence. While the fee itself is modest, this new cadence—combined with the lack of a clearly defined review structure—raises real concerns about how these reviews will be conducted and whether they will create confusion or inconsistency over time.
Just as important, several of the proposed fee increases are extremely large and significant enough to create real barriers for both existing businesses and those considering opening in Hermosa Beach.
I respectfully ask the Council to take a measured approach, table this item for the next Council meeting, and allow the community time to weigh in on these new fees and regulations. We need to ensure clarity, proper notice, and thoughtful implementation before adopting changes that could have long-term impacts on the business community.
Thank you for your consideration.
Ray
Continued from meeting of April 14, 2026
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Administrative Services Director Brendan Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Administrative Services Director Walker, City Manager Steve Napolitano, Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza, Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore, Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente, and Police Chief Landon Phillips responded to the City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Tony Higgins (Virtual)
Alan J. (In-Person)
Jon D. (In-Person)
Laura Pena (In-Person)
Maggie Bove-LaMadhi (In-Person)
Eric Horne (In-Person)
Elka Warner (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Administrative Services Director Walker and Interim Baltimore provided clarification.
Moved by: Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by: Councilmember Saemann
Motion to pull multiple identified fee categories from the proposed Master Fee Schedule for separate review and further analysis, and to proceed with discussion on the remaining fees.
This motion remained on the floor but was not acted upon following a substitute motion.
The following line items were requested to be removed and considered at a later City Council meeting:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan: S001 (Conditional Use Permit - Comm/Other), S003 (CUP/PDP - Condo), S003B (CUP Annual Monitoring), S004A (Coastal Approval In-Concept), S006 (Zone Change), S007 (Variance), S009 (Parking Plan), S013 (Final Map), S017 (Mural Review), S018 (Temporary Use Permit), S024 (Planning Commission Interpretation), S030 (Planning Sign Permit), S030A (Planning A-Frame Sign Permit), S034 (Admin Permit - Abandon CUP), S040 (Appeal to the City Council), S080 (Residential Encroachment Permit) Councilmember Jackson: None, agreed with the list provided by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan.
Councilmember Saemann: Requested to add S008 (Sign Variance).
Councilmember Francois: Did not have any additional requests.
Mayor Detoy: Requested to add S018A (M-1 Zone Limited Events Permit), S081C (A-Frame Encroachment Permit).
Substitute Motion
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to approve the fee updates in concept except for the specific fee items pulled for further review by the City Council, and to phase in the approved fee increases over two years, with the third year reserved for review.
Ayes (4): Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Noes (1): Councilmember Saemann
Motion Carried
Interim City Attorney Baltimore, Administrative Services Director, and City Manager Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions.
At 8:30 PM, Mayor Detoy re-opened the Public Hearing.
Moved by:
Mayor Detoy
Seconded by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Motion to continue the public hearing on Item 12.a, as to the items pulled for further review, to the May 12, 2026, City Council meeting.
Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried
12.b
ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION AMENDING SECTION 3.12 PURCHASING OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE Public Comments:
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
At 8:31 p.m., Mayor Detoy opened the Public Hearing.
City Manager Steve Napolitano confirmed that the public hearing for this item is being continued to the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Moved by:
Councilmember Francois
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
Motion to continue the public hearing for Agenda Item 12.b to the May 26, 2026, City Council meeting.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
13. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
Public Comments:
13.a
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FALLEN TORRANCE POLICE DETECTIVE GARY ELTON RIPPSTEIN MEMORIAL SIGN INSTALLATION LOCATED AT 8TH STREET AND ARDMORE AVENUE - 26-CMO-021 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. APPROVAL OF FALLEN TORRANCE OFFICER RIPPSTEIN SIGN INSTALLATION AT 8TH ST AND ARDMORE AVE - 26-CMO-021.pdf
2. Letter from City of Torrance Mayor Chen.pdf
3. Proposed Memorial Sign and Location Map.pdf
4. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 13.a.pdf
(City Manager Steve Napolitano)
Management Analyst Leo Zalyan provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Police Chief Landon Phillips and Torrance Police Chief Robert Dunn provided a brief statement regarding the request.
Police Chief Phillips, Management Analyst Zalyan, and Torrance Police Chief Dunn responded to the City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente and Torrance Police Chief Dunn responded to City Council questions.
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Mayor Detoy
Motion to approve the installation of a memorial sign commemorating fallen Torrance Police Detective Gary Elton Rippstein at the intersection of 8th Street and Ardmore Avenue, using the replacement pole in that location and with a smaller sign format.
Ayes (4)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, and Mayor Detoy Noes (1)
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Motion Carried
13.b
ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A SIDE LETTER TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND THE GENERAL AND SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES’ BARGAINING UNIT TEAMSTERS LOCAL 986 - 26-AS-051 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ADOPT A SIDE LETTER TO MOU BETWEEN THE CITY AND TEAMSTERS - 26-AS-051.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Draft Resolution and Side Letter.pdf
3. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 13.b.pdf
(Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman)
Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
Motion to adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7546, approving a Side Letter to the MOU between the City of Hermosa Beach and the General and Supervisory Employees’ Bargaining Unit, Teamsters Local 986, for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028.
Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried
City Manager Steve Napolitano provided clarification that City Council needed to return to the Public Hearing Agenda Item Nos. 12.a and 12.b.
13.c
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO ESTABLISH MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE FOR CLARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS - 26-PW-022 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HERMOSA BEACH LITTLE LEAGUE TO ADVANCE IMPROVEMENTS TO CLARK FIELD - 26-PW-022.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Request Letter from HBLL.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Draft MOU .pdf
4. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 13.c.pdf
Todd Tullis
Allowing HBLL to deliver improvements to Clark Field is a natural extension of the organization's deep connection to our community. Subject to Council's prioritization of Public Works projects and under the assumption that the five specific improvements do not add any additional future maintenance costs beyond what is already expected at the facility, I fully support this initiative. (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Public Works Director Joseph SanClemente provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Tony Higgins (Virtual)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Mark Mamber thanked staff for their work and getting the MOU to this point.
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Saemann
Motion to consider approval of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Hermosa Beach Little League (HBLL) to advance Clark Field improvements to be funded, designed, and constructed by HBLL ;
and authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, subject to approval by the City Attorney.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
13.d
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW CATEGORY AND FEE FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-019 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW CATEGORY AND FEE FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-019.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Map of Encroachment Areas.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Resolution 23-7379.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Fee Log.pdf
5. Attachment 4. Draft Resolution.pdf
6. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 13.d.pdf
7. SUPPLEMENTAL Petition for Item 13.d.pdf
Todd Tullis
I noticed that Attachment 3 lists "Special Rate" for two businesses but there is no detail as to what this means in any of the other attachments. I don't recall this shared in previous Council agenda items on this topic, would be useful to know these amounts and rationale. (Environmental Programs Douglas Krauss)
Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Betty Gregorian (In-Person)
Voc Gregorian (In-Person) - Provided the City Clerk with signatures that were received and incorporated into the record.
Mark D. Warshaw (In-Person)
Ira Ellman (In-Person)
Alan J.(In-Person)
John D. (In-Person)
Andrew G. (In-Person)
Laura (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore and City Manager Steve Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions.
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Saemann
Motion to direct staff to return with a modified resolution that maintains the approved encroachment fee framework for commercial zones but excludes commercial activity located in residential zones, with all other portions of the resolution and fee schedule remaining approved.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
13.e
AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR ON-CALL VEHICLE OUTFITTING SERVICES - 26-AS-024 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT-VEHICLE UPFITTING CONTRACT AWARD - 26-AS-024.pdf
2. Attachment 1 - Proposed Professional Services Agreement with Commline, Inc.pdf
3. Attachment 2 - Proposed Professional Services Agreement with Derotic Emergency Equipment, A Vector Company.pdf
4. Attachment 3 - Proposed Professional Services Agreement with 10-33 Industries.pdf
5. Attachment 4. - RFQ On-Call Outfitting Services.pdf
6. Attachment 5 - Commline, Inc. Statement of Qualifications.pdf
7. Attachment 6 - Derotic, LLC Statement of Qualifications.pdf
8. Attachment 7 - 10-33 Industries LLC Statement of Qualifications.pdf
9. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 13.e.pdf
Todd Tullis
Cost savings was not mentioned as a benefit of taking this "on our own" approach. Does this mean that vehicle outfitting costs are expected to be higher than they have been in the past? If so, how much higher? Outfitting budgets for public safety vehicles have been in the $300-$500k range for the past couple years. If this approach is going to be materially more expensive, could we understand more clearly the "ongoing challenges with timeliness and availability" that have been experienced and what attempts were made to resolve them? (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Administrative Services Director Walker, Police Chief Landon Phillips, City Manager Steve Napolitano, and Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to award professional services agreements for on-call vehicle outfitting services to Commline, Inc., Derotic Emergency Equipment, A Vector Company, and 10-33 Industries, Ltd., each in an amount not-to-exceed $1,000,000 for a term ending April 14, 2031, and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements with minor modifications subject to City Attorney approval. The motion carried by voice vote, with support from the full Council.
Ayes (5): Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried
Additional direction was given to staff to review the South Bay Regional Public Communications Authority (RCC) contract and pursue improvements before relying on the new bench of vendors where possible.
14. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Public Comments:
This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only.
Councilmember Francois asked that the May 12, 2026, agenda item regarding Assembly Bill 1942 include information on the Cal Cities position recommending inclusion of Class 1, 2, and 3 electric bicycles.
City Manager Steve Napolitano responded to City Council questions and provided clarification.
Councilmember Francois requested support for a future agenda item to review the City’s sidewalk vending permit program, including where permits are being issued, how the fees are structured, and how the system is being administered. The request did not receive City Council support.
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan requested that, as part of future discussions with the City of Redondo Beach regarding fire services, staff also seek information regarding dispatch service pricing so the City could compare potential costs and savings. Support was expressed for obtaining that information as part of the fire services discussion. Councilmember Saemann concurred.
City Manager Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan also requested a future action item to consider rescinding the City’s current Coastal Development Permit application regarding short-term rentals and to bring back potential regulations that would expand short-term rental opportunities in the coastal zone and throughout the City, including comparisons to other coastal cities and their enforcement structures. The request received support from Councilmember Saemann and Councilmember Francois to return as an action item.
City Manager Napolitano provided clarification and responded to City Council questions.
14.a
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-025
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA 4-28-26 - 26-CMO-025.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Tentative Future Agenda.pdf
Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.
This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.
15. CITY MANAGER REPORT
Public Comments:
No report from City Manager Steve Napolitano.
16. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Public Comments:
This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken.
16.a
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 3, 2026 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Action Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting of March 3, 2026.pdf (Parks & Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)
This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.
16.b
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2026 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Action Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 17, 2026.pdf (Community Development Director Alison Becker)
This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.
16.c
POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR FEBRUARY 2026
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Monthly Crime Report Summary - February 2026.pdf
(Police Chief Landon Philips)
This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.
16.d
POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR MARCH 2026
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Monthly Crime Report Summary - March 2026.pdf
(Police Chief Landon Philips)
This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.
17. ADJOURNMENT
Public Comments:
At 9:55 p.m., Mayor Detoy adjourned the meeting to the May 12, 2026, Closed Session at 5:00 p.m.