CITY COUNCIL - June 23, 2026
1. CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM
Public Comments:
Mayor Detoy called the Closed Session meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Public Comments:
City Clerk Martha Alvarez announced that Mayor Pro Tem Keegan would be participating remotely per Government Code Section 54953(b).
Roll call led by City Clerk Alvarez and announced there was a quorum.
Present:
Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Saemann
Absent:
Councilmember Francois
Councilmember Francois arrived at 5:08 p.m.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Public Comments:
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
4. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
Public Comments:
The City Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:06 p.m.
4.a
MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on May 12 and June 9, 2026 Public Comments:
4.b
Conference with Legal Counsel
Public Comments:
(Existing Litigation) pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Rachel Muzatko v. City of Hermosa Beach et al 19-145623 Case Number: 20TRCV0048
5. OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM
Public Comments:
Mayor Detoy called the Open Session to order at 6:00 p.m.
6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Public Comments:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Sebastian Elortegui.
7. ROLL CALL
Public Comments:
City Clerk Martha Alvarez announced that Mayor Pro Tem Keegan would be participating remotely per Government Code Section 54953(b).
Roll call led by City Clerk Alvarez and announced a quorum.
Present:
Mayor Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann
8. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Public Comments:
Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore reported that there were no reportable actions from Closed Session.
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS
Public Comments:
Mayor Detoy thanked everyone who participated in the Mayor’s Conversation and Beach Cleanup held on June 20, 2026, and announced plans for a future Conversation and Picnic in the Park event in celebration of National Parks and Recreation Month. He also noted that the 2026 Hermosa Beach Triathlon is scheduled for August and that volunteer opportunities will be available.
Councilmember Francois announced that he will host a Community Forum on June 30, 2026, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers and invited members of the public to attend and discuss community issues.
10. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Public Comments:
Moved by:
Councilmember Francois
Seconded by:
Councilmember Saemann
A motion was made by Councilmember Francois, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to approve the order of the agenda.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
11. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
Public Comments:
11.a
RECOGNIZING KIM SWINDELL FOR HER RETIREMENT AND SERVICE TO THE CITY Public Comments:
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker presented remarks honoring Kim Swindell on her 20 years of service to the City of Hermosa Beach. Mayor Detoy presented certificates of recognition on behalf of Congressman Ted Lieu, State Senator Ben Allen, Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, County Supervisor Holly Mitchell, and the City of Hermosa Beach, along with a commemorative street sign.
11.b
RECOGNIZING JULY AS NATIONAL PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. SUPPLEMENTAL Attachment for Item 11.b.pdf
Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols presented upcoming July activities, including junior youth volleyball tournaments, a special event with the City's mascot Sunny, and a Picnic in the Park with the Mayor. Full-time Parks and Recreation staff and commissioners were present. Mayor Detoy read and presented the proclamation declaring July 2026, as Parks and Recreation Month.
12. PUBLIC COMMENT
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. ecomment report 6-23-26.pdf
tonyhiggins
June 22, 2026
Dear Members of the City Council, Members of the Parks and Recreation Commission, and City Manager Napolitano:
I am writing to urge the City Council to preserve the Parks and Recreation Commission’s authority to independently review special events, request staff reports, hold public hearings, and present recommendations directly to the City Council when a majority of commissioners determine such action is warranted.
Efficiency in government is important, but it must never come at the expense of transparency, public accountability, or meaningful community representation.
The Parks and Recreation Commission exists to ensure that the City’s parks, beaches, and neighborhoods are protected and managed in accordance with the values and priorities of Hermosa Beach residents. Its purpose is not simply to advise staff, but to provide independent oversight and serve as the community’s voice on matters that directly affect quality of life.
Special events bring economic benefits and cultural opportunities, but they also impose costs.
Increased commercialization of public spaces can create noise, congestion, parking impacts, public safety demands, environmental degradation, and the gradual erosion of the character of our neighborhoods and beaches.
The natural tension between expanding special events and preserving residents’ quality of life is precisely why independent commission oversight is necessary.
The City’s 2024 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, supported by a comprehensive community survey, found that approximately 70 percent of residents believed Hermosa Beach already hosts about the right number of high-impact special events and did not support expanding them. This clear expression of community sentiment should guide future policy decisions.
Unfortunately, the proposed Special Events Policy Guide moves in the opposite direction by consolidating authority within the Parks and Recreation Director’s office while reducing opportunities for public review and independent oversight.
Several proposed changes are particularly concerning:
New events would no longer automatically require review by the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council. Instead, the Parks and Recreation Director would have sole discretion to determine whether a public hearing is necessary.
Returning high-impact events would no longer require automatic City Council approval unless directed by the Council or unless the Director determines that “significant changes” have occurred.
Existing appeal and review processes for lower-tier events would be reduced or eliminated.
The Director would be granted sole authority to determine what constitutes a “significant change,” effectively controlling whether an event receives additional public scrutiny.
The Parks Commission would not be able to voice a dissenting view to the Council.
These changes shift decision-making authority away from public bodies and concentrate it within a single administrative position. Regardless of intent, the practical effect is to diminish community input and weaken the independent role of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
To preserve public trust and maintain appropriate checks and balances, the Special Events Policy Guide should explicitly affirm that:
The Parks and Recreation Commission may request staff reports regarding any special event.
The Commission may review any special event at a publicly noticed meeting.
A majority vote of the Commission may require a public hearing on any special event.
The Commission may make recommendations directly to the City Council that differ from those of the Parks and Recreation Director.
No administrative policy or staff action may prevent, delay, or impede the Commission from exercising these authorities.
The Commission’s ability to independently evaluate special events is not an obstacle to efficient government—it is an essential safeguard against unintended consequences and a critical mechanism for ensuring that resident perspectives remain central to decision-making.
As Hermosa Beach continues to balance economic opportunities with the preservation of its unique character, the City must resist the temptation to streamline public participation out of the process. The long-term stewardship of our beaches, parks, and neighborhoods requires robust oversight, transparent decision-making, and meaningful community representation.
I respectfully urge the City Council to amend the proposed Special Events Policy Guide to preserve and strengthen the Parks and Recreation Commission’s authority to review special events and communicate directly with the Council on behalf of the residents they serve.
Respectfully,
tonyhiggins
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Jim Holtz (In-Person)
Michelle Hamp (In-Person)
Eric Horne (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
13. CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
Public Comments:
No City Councilmember comments were provided.
14. UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES
Public Comments:
Councilmember Francois reported that he attended the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission meeting the prior week as a representative of the South Bay Council of Governments.
15. CONSENT CALENDAR
Public Comments:
Councilmember Francois requested to move Agenda Item No. 15. b "City Council Minutes," to be individually considered.
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to approve the City Council Agenda Item Nos. 15.a-15.k, with the exception of Agenda Item No. 15.b, being removed for individual consideration.
Ayes (5)
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Saemann, Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried
15.a
WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA Public Comments:
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
Motion Carried
15.c
CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-070
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CHECK REGISTERS 6-23-2026 - 26-AS-070.pdf
2. Attachment 1. 6-3-26.pdf
3. Attachment 2. 6-11-26.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to receive and file the check registers for June 3, 2026 through June 11, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.
Motion Carried
15.d
CASH BALANCE REPORT - 26-AS-071
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - APRIL 2026 CASH BALANCE REPORT - 26-AS-071.pdf
2. Attachment 1. April 2026 Cash Balance Report.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to receive and file the April 2026 Cash Balance Report.
Motion Carried
15.e
REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR April 2026 - 26-AS-072 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR APRIL 2026 - 26-AS-072.pdf
2. Attachment 1. April 2026 Revenue Report.pdf
3. Attachment 2. April 2026 Expenditure Report.pdf
4. Attachment 3. April 2026 CIP Report by Project.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to receive and file the April 2026 Financial Reports.
Motion Carried
15.f
ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE ANNUAL TAX APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 - 26-AS-066 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ADOPTION OF THE 2026-27 TAX APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT - 26-AS-066.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Resolution Adopting FY 2026–27 Appropriations Limit.pdf
3. Attachment 2. FY 2026-27 Calculation of Appropriation Limit.pdf (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to
adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7556
approving and adopting the annual Tax Appropriations Limit for the upcoming
Fiscal Year 202
6 –
2 7
.
Motion Carried
15.g
CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-067
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - MAY 2026 CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - 26-AS-067.pdf
2. Attachment 1. May 2026 Treasurer's Report.pdf
(City Treasurer Dave Pedersen)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to receive and file the May 2026 City Treasurer’s Report.
Motion Carried
15.h
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF JUNE 15, 2026 - 26-PW-046 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CIP STATUS REPORT JUNE 2026 - 26-PW-046.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of June 15, 2026.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Estimated CIP Project Schedule FY 2025-2026 – Updated June 15, 2026.pdf (Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of June 15, 2026.
Motion Carried
15.i
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE PERTAINING TO THE NOVEMBER 3, 2026, GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK - 26-CCO-009 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE PERTAINING TO THE NOVEMBER 3, 2026, ELECTIONS - 26-CCO-009.pdf
2. Draft Resolution Call and Notice of General Municipal Election.pdf
3. Draft Resolution Consolidating the Election.pdf
4. Draft Resolution Candidate Statement.pdf
(City Clerk Martha Alvarez)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7557 calling and giving notice of the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election for the City of Hermosa Beach; adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7558 requesting consolidation of the City’s General Municipal Election with the Los Angeles County General Election to be held on November 3, 2026; and adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7559 establishing regulations for candidate statements submitted to the voters for the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election.
Motion Carried
15.j
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT (TA24-01) AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) PERTAINING TO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE - 26-CDD-057 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - SECOND READING ZTA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES - 26-CDD-057.pdf
2. Attachment 1. City Council Ordinance (with Exhibits A-R).pdf
3. Attachment 2. Zoning Code Assessment.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Redlined and Annotated Draft Ordinance Exhibits.pdf (Community Development Director Alison Becker)
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to determine the Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; adopt by title only and waive second reading of an Ordinance No.ORD-26-1500 of the City of Hermosa Beach approving the Zone Text Amendment (TA24-01); and Direct the City Clerk to print and publish the summary ordinance in a newspaper of general circulations within 15 days following adoption and post it on the City‘s bulletin for 30-days.
Motion Carried
15.k
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.30 SPECIAL EVENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, 12.30.010 and 12.30.030 - 26-PR-042 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - SECOND READING SPECIAL EVENT POLICY AND FEE UPDATES - 26-PR-042.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Special Events Policy Guide.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Proposed Ordinance .pdf
tonyhiggins
PLEASE TAP/CLICK ON URL ABOVE IF INTERESTED IN FURTHER DETAILS ON THE CITY's RCS study that found over $3,000,000 in annual taxpayer subsidies across all departments and $1.5 million in Rec Department subsidies.
Dear City Council
The 800lb Gorilla in the room is the city council doesnt have a clue about how much of the $1.5 million in tax payer subsidies for Recreation Department Programs & Services identified in the RCS Study will actually be recovered with the new fee schedule.
Accordingly it doesnt have a clue about how large the the subsidy will be for each program.
This flies in the face of the stated goals of full cost recovery for each fee or service unless the council explicitly authorized a taxpayer subsidy.
This is fiscal irresponsibility in the face of a serious fiscal crisis.
These are not difficult calculations. We know the new costs. We know the ~number of events or the number of participants.
But the Rec Dept changed some of its processes and fees and the City Council really doesnt have a clue about the amount of Rec Department subsidies. Ask them! This fly by the seat of your pants approach to cost recovery should be weighed by residents when Staff and the Council come hat-in-hand asking for a $4 million sales tax increase; half of which will be paid by local residents (Lead Special Events and Filming Coordinator Kalyn Kaemerle) Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
Motion to determine the Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 (b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines; adopt by title only and waive second reading of an Ordinance No. ORD-26-1501 of the City of Hermosa Beach amending Chapter 12.30 (Special Events on Public Property) and Section 12.30.010 (Special event regulations generally) and 12.30.030 (Special event approval and permit issuance) to amend policies related to special events on public property; and direct the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance in a newspaper of general circulations within 15 days following adoption and post it on the City‘s bulletin for 30-days.
Motion Carried
15.b
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. June 9, 2026 Adjourned Regular Meeting.pdf
2. June 9, 2026 Regular Meeting.pdf
3. June 9, 2026 Regular Meeting Revised.pdf
(City Clerk Martha Alvarez)
Councilmember Francois pulled the item, stating the June 9, 2026 meeting minutes did not adequately reflect two points of order and the Mayor's rulings. Interim City Attorney Baltimore advised that the supplemental revisions issued earlier that day sufficiently documented the procedural actions and met the legal requirements for meeting minutes.
Moved by:
Councilmember Francois
A motion was made by Councilmember Francois, to withdraw the minutes, revise them, and return at the next meeting with language specifically reflecting that Councilmember Francois raised a point of order, that Councilmember Jackson was found out of order, the Councilmember Francois made a second point of order and it was disposed by the Mayor moving to the next item. The motion failed for lack of a second.
Substitute Motion
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Mayor Detoy
A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Mayor Detoy, to approve the minutes from the June 9, 2026, Adjourned Regular Meeting and the revised minutes from the June 9, 2026, Regular Meeting.
Ayes (4)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Noes (1)
Councilmember Francois
Motion Carried
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M
Public Comments:
16.a
RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY UPDATE - 26-AS-064 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEES FROM A FEE STUDY - 26-AS-064.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Draft Fee Resolution.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Proposed Fee Changes.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Fee Study Update.pdf
5. Attachment 4. Current Master Fee and Charges Schedule.pdf
6. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 16.a.pdf
7. SUPPLEMENTAL Emailed Comment for Item 16.a.pdf
th
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
I respectfully urge the Council to distinguish between documented operational inefficiencies and the possibility of future process improvements when considering implementation of the RCS fee study recommendations.
The Chamber’s letter raises several thoughtful ideas regarding streamlining, tiered fees, ministerial approvals, and other process improvements. Many of these concepts may ultimately reduce costs and improve customer service. However, the letter does not present evidence demonstrating that the City’s current fee calculations are materially overstated or that existing processes are so inefficient that the fee study’s conclusions are unreliable.
Throughout the letter, references are made to process improvements that “may” reduce staff time in the future. That is a reasonable basis for future review and recalibration. It is not, however, evidence that current taxpayer subsidies should continue indefinitely while those improvements are being studied, developed, and implemented.
If the City later adopts process changes that measurably reduce the cost of providing services, fees can and should be adjusted accordingly. In fact, the Chamber itself recommends six-month and twelve-month reviews to evaluate actual outcomes. That approach recognizes that future efficiencies should be demonstrated through measurable results rather than assumed in advance.
The Council should certainly pursue process improvements aggressively. However, absent objective evidence that the RCS analysis materially overstates the City’s current cost of service, fee decisions should be based on documented costs rather than speculation regarding future savings.
A prudent approach is to implement cost recovery where justified, monitor actual performance, and adjust fees as efficiencies are achieved and verified. This protects both applicants and taxpayers while ensuring policy decisions are grounded in measurable facts rather than assumptions.
Thank you for your consideration.
tonyhiggins
Jon David
This process has not been as clean as it may appear from the dais.
S-004 — the Precise Development Plan fee for commercial and mixed-use — appears to be in procedural limbo. It wasn't formally adopted at the last meeting, and it's not on tonight's agenda. It's probably staying at its current level by default, which is fine — but it deserves an explicit answer, not a gap in the record.
More importantly, since minor PDP review was recently applied to this category, the fee probably should come down. Either reduce it tonight, or bring it back in three to six months once staff has data on the actual workload. Don't leave it floating.
On the bigger picture, this Council has an opportunity to send a clear message— that Hermosa values efficiency, and that our fee structure should reward streamlined process, not entrench the old one. City staff isn't the problem. They do exactly as they are supposed to do. They follow policy. Policy is the problem. When you charge full cost recovery for a process that takes three times longer than it should, you're locking in that inefficiency permanently. You're setting the standard.
Take our Parking Plan Fee, we only have one Tier. As it appear to Manhattan Beach only charged for a MAJOR development parking plan, which is $2,225 and has eliminated its Development (Parking) Traffic Review - Development Permits.
Consider that small businesses can't absorb high fees and rapid fee escalation the way some might assume. The revenue these fees generate barely registers in the City's budget. But for the business owner writing the check, it can be the difference between filing and walking away. That's not a hypothetical — it's what's been happening.
Adopt fees that reflect where you want the process to be, not where it's been.
Laura Pena
Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff -
I appreciate the City’s work to update the Fee Study and address cost recovery. We have real fiscal pressures, and it is reasonable to review outdated fees. However, I respectfully ask Council to carefully review the attached detailed fee analysis before adopting the remaining increases, especially where the fees affect businesses, property reinvestment, signs, murals, temporary events, parking plans, CUPs, and mixed-use development.
The issue is not simply whether the City should recover costs. The issue is whether those costs reflect an efficient, streamlined, and predictable process.
The attached analysis identifies several fees where the proposed increase may be based on current staff time and current procedures, while the City is also considering zoning updates, administrative approvals, and process changes that may reduce the actual workload. If the process is about to change, the fee should be recalibrated to that improved process, not locked in based on today’s system.
That is why Option 4 is the most balanced approach. It does not reject cost recovery. It allows the City to move forward responsibly while deferring or recalibrating fees that should be tied to streamlining, actual staff time, and project complexity.
I would also ask Council to consider the specific recommendations in the attached analysis, including creating clearer tiers for minor, standard, and major reviews; avoiding duplicative fees; using refunds or credits when actual staff time is lower than estimated; and reporting back in 6 and 12 months on processing times, fee revenue, permit volume, and customer experience.
Fees are not just accounting tools. They shape whether businesses open, property owners reinvest, storefronts improve, and commercial districts stay active.
We can be fiscally responsible and business friendly at the same time. The best path forward is a fee structure that recovers reasonable costs, rewards efficiency, and supports the private investment our City needs to thrive.
This version directly references the attached detailed fee analysis and ties your recommendations to Option 4, tiering, recalibration, and business impacting fees.
As always, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration.
Laura Peña
Kathleen Knoll
Dear Mayor Detoy and Council members,
I am writing regarding Item 16a and the proposed fee increases. I have submitted comments on this issue at prior meetings, and I respectfully ask the Council to support Option 4 and defer the following fee increases until there has been an efficiency study of staff time and the City has had an opportunity to streamline these processes.
As the City improves and simplifies permitting procedures, these types of major fee increases should become less necessary. Many small businesses are already facing rising rents, higher operating costs, insurance increases, labor costs, and an overall challenging business climate. Increasing permit fees so dramatically puts another burden on local businesses that are simply trying to survive, adapt, and remain creative.
S-001 CUP Commercial/Other
Increasing this fee from $6,000 to $12,000 feels excessive and will discourage business owners from making improvements, expanding uses, or adapting their businesses to meet today’s economic challenges. We should be encouraging local businesses to be creative, attract new customers, and generate enough revenue to pay rent and stay open.
S-003B CUP Annual Monitoring
This seems unnecessary and could create additional staff work rather than reduce it. CUPs should come up for review when there is a specific issue, complaint, or reason for review — not automatically every year.
S-004 PDP Commercial/Mixed Use
This increase also feels cost-prohibitive for small businesses and property owners trying to improve or activate commercial spaces.
S-004A Coastal Approval In-Concept
Businesses in the Coastal Zone already have to go through the Coastal Commission process and pay fees directly to the Coastal Commission. When I presented my plan for Uncorked, I had to submit everything to Coastal. This feels like an additional City fee on top of an already expensive and complicated Coastal process.
S-008 Sign Variance
This process should be administrative whenever possible. It seems unnecessary to require Planning Commission review unless a business is appealing or challenging a staff decision. This would save both staff time and applicant costs.
S-009 Parking Plan
This fee should not increase. If a business is pursuing a CUP change and also needs a parking plan, the combined fees could exceed $20,000. That is simply cost-prohibitive for many small businesses. This item should be pulled out and considered separately, especially while the City is still working through zoning and parking issues.
S-017 Mural Fee
Hermosa Beach benefits from murals and public art. Murals help make our community unique, creative, and welcoming. Increasing the cost will discourage businesses and artists from adding murals, when we should be encouraging more of them.
S-018 Temporary Use Permit
We spent two years trying to streamline this process so more businesses could take advantage of minor temporary special event permits. These fee increases would discourage businesses from hosting outdoor events and special events.
I believe the fees should remain the same, and changing a date should be a minimal administrative fee, such as $100. I personally do these events four times per year, and they are generally the same type of event each time. For repeat events, I do not understand why the staff time would increase significantly.
Additionally, these events are held on private property, and it feels unfair to charge excessive fees for a business to activate its own space. I thought the goal was to encourage businesses to be creative, create new revenue streams, and bring people into our beautiful beach city. These events are a win-win for the business, the City, and the community.
S-018A M-1 Zone Limited Event Permit
I have the same concerns as stated above regarding temporary use permits.
S-030 Planning Sign Permit
This appears to be another added fee that creates more burden for small business owners.
S-030A Planning A-Frame Sign Permit and S-081C A-Frame Encroachment Permit These should be consolidated. This should be a straightforward administrative process with a clear procedure. If a business follows the rules, it should not require multiple fees or a complicated review process.
In closing, I respectfully ask the Council to table these fee increases until a later date, after the City has completed an efficiency study and reviewed how staff can further streamline these processes.
Please do not place these fee increases on the backs of small business owners at a time when many of us are already struggling to survive. Local businesses are dealing with significant rent increases and rising costs. When additional fees are added for things like A-frame signs, special events, murals, and permit changes, it discourages us from doing the very things that help attract customers, activate the community and keep Hermosa unique.
Thank you for listening to our concerns and recommendations.
Kathy Knoll / Jeff Bonafede
Elka Worner
Mayor Detoy and City Council members,
I work in a small retail business in Hermosa Beach and wanted to share a perspective from the ground level of how these proposed fee increases could affect local businesses.
I understand the city’s need to recover costs and support long-term financial stability. At the same time, for small businesses, fees are not just numbers on a schedule. They influence decisions about whether to invest in improvements, update signage, or move forward with tenant upgrades.
Many local businesses are already facing higher costs, and additional fees can make businesses think twice before investing in improvements. When fees increase before the city completes efforts to make approvals faster and simpler, businesses end up paying more without knowing whether the process will actually become more efficient.
I support the Chamber’s recommendation for Option 4, which would defer certain fee increases until the city can evaluate whether process improvements actually reduce staff time.
If applications become quicker and easier to process, fees should reflect those efficiencies. Simpler projects should cost less than complex ones and repeat applicants should not pay as if they are starting from scratch each time.
Hermosa benefits when businesses continue investing in their spaces, improving storefronts, and keeping commercial areas vibrant and occupied. I encourage the Council to take a measured approach that supports both fiscal responsibility and a healthy business environment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Elka Worner
Michelle Crispin
Please see attached letter.
(Continued
from the
June 9
, 2026 City Council Meeting)
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Administrative Services Director Walker and Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Jim Holtz (In-Person)
Elka Worner (In-Person)
Laura Pena (In-Person)
Michelle Crispin (In-Person)
Jon David (In-Person)
Unknown Speaker (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to add fees S-004, S-007, S-008, and S-017 to the highlighted/deferred list for process review, and to remove fee 30.a from that list.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to approve Resolution No. RES-26-7560; fully defer fee increases on all highlighted/deferred items pending completion of process and zoning improvements; and set 75% cost recovery over a two-year period for all remaining non-highlighted fees among the 19.
Ayes (3)
Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Noes (2)
Councilmember Jackson, and Mayor Detoy
Motion Carried
16.b
ANNUAL STAFFING VACANCIES REPORT – ASSEMBLY BILL 2561 (AB 2561) - 26-AS-076 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ANNUAL STAFFING VACANCIES REPORT - ASSEMBLY BILL 2561 (AB 2561) - 26-AS-076.pdf
2. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 16.b.pdf
tonyhiggins
Dear City Council,
Although you apparently have solved the FY 26-27 $3.2 million General Fund deficit we are still facing a $5 million budget FY 27-28 deficit and you wont have budget surpluses and cash reserves to save the day.
We are facing a $20 million General Fund deficit over the next 5 years and on top of that $50 million in unfunded but approved high priority capital projects You will need a combination of new revenue streams and further cost cutting.
Please dont come hat-in-hand asking for a $4 million local sales tax increase without explaining why some of the hiring freeze strategies listed below cannot be implemented:
IMPLEMENT a HARD FREEZE on non-essential vacancies:
Pause all recruiting for open civilian roles across public works, parks, and administrative support to stop structural cash bleed.
TARGET MANAGEMENT REDUNDANCIES:
Permanently eliminate or freeze high-salary administrative positions, similar to the previous deletion of the Deputy City Manager role, to capture immediate salary and benefit savings.
CAPTURE NATURAL ATTRITION:
Move positions automatically into a frozen pool when employees retire or resign, rather than opening them up for immediate backfill.
ESTABLISH a STRATEGIC REVIEW PANEL:
Require the City Manager and Administrative Services Director to review vacancies, ensuring a job is only filled if it prevents legal non-compliance or total service failure.
EXEMPT CRITICAL PUBLIC SAFETY:
Automatically exclude core police, fire, and lifeguard personnel from the freeze to prevent a drop in emergency response times.
ALLOW REVENUE--GENERATING EXCEPTIONS:
Permit hiring for self-funding positions, like building inspectors or code enforcement officers, where a vacancy directly cuts city fee revenues.
DEPLOY INTERNAL STAFF REALLOCATION:
Cross-train and temporarily transfer underutilized employees from lower-priority departments to fill critical operational gaps without increasing overall headcount.
INVEST in PROCESS AUTOMATION
Use a portion of the frozen salary savings to automate routine tasks, like construction plan checks, to permanently eliminate the need for those roles.
LEVERAGE temporary and contract labor:
Use seasonal workers for peak summer tourism workloads, such as beach maintenance and parking enforcement, to handle spikes without incurring permanent pension liabilities.
BAN NON-ESSENTIAL OVERTIME:
Combine the hiring freeze with strict overtime controls to ensure departments do not replicate the cost of missing staff through increased overtime payouts.
Thank You for considering,
tony higgins
(Human Resources Manager Tyler Cashman)
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Elka Worner (In-Person)
Eric Horne (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Jackson, to receive and file the FY 2025-2026 Annual Staffing Vacancies Report, per Assembly Bill 2561 (AB2561).
Ayes (5)
Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Francois, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Saemann, and Councilmember Jackson Motion Carried
16.c
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 BUDGET - 26-AS-073
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 BUDGET - 26-AS-073.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Draft Resolution and Exhibit A.pdf
3. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 16.c.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
City Manager Steve Napolitano provided a brief introduction.
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Jim Holtz (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to adopt Resolution No. RES-26-7561, adopting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget; approving related General Fund transfers and assignments; and making findings regarding the City's fiscal plan.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Saemann, Councilmember Francois, and Mayor Detoy Motion Carried
16.d
PUBLIC HEARING TO REVIEW DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE COLLECTION (REFUSE) CHARGES FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLACING SAID CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLLS AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AFFECTING PROPERTIES WITH REFUSE BILLS DELINQUENT AS OF MARCH 31, 2026 - 26-CMO-039 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - ANNUAL TRASH DELINQUENCY LIENS - 26-CMO-039.pdf
2. Attachment 1. List of Properties.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Notice of Hearing.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Draft Resolution.pdf
5. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 16.d.pdf
(Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss)
Executive Assistant Ann Yang provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comment.
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion to adopt Resolution No. RES.26-7562, confirming deliquent refuse collection charges and authorizing the County Assessor to collect such charges as special assessments ofn the Los Angeles County Property Tax Roll.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Saemann, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Mayor Detoy, and Councilmember Francois Motion Carried
16.e
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT - 26-PW-044 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFIRM ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT FY2027 - 26-PW-044.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Draft Resolution.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Resolution 26-7541.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Engineer's Report.pdf
5. Attachment 4. Resolution 26-7550.pdf
6. Attachment 5. Resolution 26-7551.pdf
7. Attachment 6. Notice of Public Hearing.pdf
8. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 16.e.pdf
(Senior Engineer Brandon Araujo)
Senior Engineer Brandon Araujo provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comment.
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to adopt Resolution No. RES.26-7563, confirming a diagram and assessment and levying assessments for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027, in connection with the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2026-2027.
Ayes (5)
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Francois, and Councilmember Saemann Motion Carried
*Attachments 1 and 4 for this agenda item have been revised and updated
16.f
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNUAL LEVY OF SEWER CHARGES ON THE PROPERTY TAX ROLL - 26-PW-034 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - SEWER LEVY 2026-2027 - 26-PW-034.pdf
2. Attachment 1 Hermosa Beach Sewer Levy 26-27 Revised.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Engineer's Report with CPI-W increase for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.pdf
4. Attachment 3. Mailer to Property Owners.pdf
5. Attachment 4 Hermosa Beach Public Notice Sewer Levy 2026 to 2027 Revised.pdf
6. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 16.f.pdf
(Senior Engineer Brandon Araujo)
Senior Engineer Brandon Araujo provided the PowerPoint presentation.
City Attorney Jason Baltimore responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comment.
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to adopt Resolution No. RES.26-7564, confirming the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 sewer service charges and authorizing their collection on the Los Angeles County Property Tax Roll.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Francois, Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, Councilmember Saemann, Councilmember Jackson, and Mayor Detoy Motion Carried
17. MUNICIPAL MATTERS
Public Comments:
17.a
DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL REVENUE MEASURES AND FUTURE BALLOT INITIATIVES - 26-AS-074 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT-DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION REGARDING FUTURE BALLOT INITIATIVES - 26-AS-074.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Revenue Measure Survey Study.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Revenue Measure Survey Study Presentation.pdf
4. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 17.a.pdf
5. Public Comments (Received After Deadline).pdf
Anand Chhabria
The H2o Hermosa Beach Hotel group is not in favor of increasing TOT rate. We do not experience a high enough occupancy rate that would justify an increase. Increasing the TOT would deter visitors from choosing Hermosa Beach over neighboring beach cities. (Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council questions.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments. The following individual(s) spoke:
Jim Holts (In-Person)
Elka Worner (In-Person)
Seeing no further requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comments.
Administrative Services Director Walker, City Manager Steve Napolitano, and Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore responded to City Council questions.
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Saemann
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to direct staff to develop and return with ballot language for a 0.5% local general sales tax measure for the November 3, 2026, ballot.
Amendment:
Moved by:
Councilmember Francois
A substitute motion was made by Councilmember Francois, to place both a 0.5% sales tax measure and a 1% TOT increase on the November ballot, allowing voters to decide on each separately. Motion failed for lack of a second.
Amendment:
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
A substitute motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Councilmember Francois, to place both a 0.5% sales tax measure (with an automatic escalation to 1% upon the sunset of Measure ER in five years) and a TOT measure increasing the hotel rate to 15% with an additional 3% surcharge on short-term vacation rentals on the November ballot.
Ayes (2)
Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Francois
Noes (3)
Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Failed
Amendment:
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
A substitute motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, to adopt a 0.5% sales tax increase now with an automatic additional 0.5% in five years upon the sunset of the Measure ER with a built-in sunset clause should state-level actions dictate different parameters in the future. Motion failed for lack of a second.
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Councilmember Francois, place a separate TOT ballot measure on the November 2026 ballot. This measure aimed to increase the hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate from 14% to 15% (a 1% increase) and establish an additional 3% surcharge specifically for short-term vacation rentals.
Ayes (2)
Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Francois
Noes (3)
Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Failed
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
Seconded by:
Councilmember Saemann
Returned to initial motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to direct staff to develop and return with ballot language for a 0.5% local general sales tax measure for the November 3, 2026, ballot.
Ayes (4)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Noes (1)
Councilmember Francois
Motion Carried
Amendment:
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Councilmember Francois, proposed a new motion for a separate TOT ballot measure, to increase the hotel Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) rate from 14% to 15% (a 1% increase) and establish an additional 3% surcharge specifically for short-term vacation rentals.
Ayes (2)
Councilmember Jackson, and Councilmember Francois
Noes (3)
Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Failed
Amendment:
Moved by:
Mayor Pro Tem Keegan
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Keegan, to consider a ballot measure raising downtown commercial zone building height limits from 30 feet to 35 feet between Hermosa Avenue and 10th Street.
Councilmember Francois made a point of order.
Interim City Attorney Jason Baltimore provided clarification.
City Manager Steve Napolitano responded to City Council questions.
17.b
ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY’S PARKING VIOLATION BAIL SCHEDULE INCREASING PENALTY AMOUNTS - 26-AS-075 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY'S PARKING VIOLATION BAIL SCHEDULE INCREASE PENALTY AMOUNTS - 26-AS-075.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Current-Parking Violation Bail Schedule.pdf
3. Attachment 2. Draft Resolution Parking Bail Schedule.pdf
4. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 17.b.pdf
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)
Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comment.
Moved by:
Councilmember Jackson
Seconded by:
Councilmember Saemann
A motion was made by Councilmember Jackson, seconded by Councilmember Saemann, to accelerate the year-3 parking citation increases to take effect on August 1, 2026.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Councilmember Jackson
A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Jackson, to increase the parking citation late payment penalty to an amount equal to the full citation amount (doubling the penalty), effective on August 1, 2026.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Jackson, Councilmember Francois, Councilmember Saemann, Mayor Detoy, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
17.c
ADOPTION OF A TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTION POLICY REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 707 (2025) REGARDING DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE DURING PUBLIC MEETINGS - 26-CCO-010 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTION POLICY (SB 707) - 26-CCO-010.pdf
2. Draft Resolution Technology Disruption Policy.pdf
3. Technology Disruption Policy.pdf
4. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 17.c.pdf
(City Clerk Martha Alvarez)
City Clerk Martha Alvarez provided the PowerPoint presentation.
Mayor Detoy opened the floor to public comments.
Seeing no requests to speak, Mayor Detoy closed the floor to public comment.
Moved by:
Councilmember Saemann
Seconded by:
Councilmember Francois
A motion was made by Councilmember Saemann, seconded by Councilmember Francois to adopt Resolution No. RES.26-7566, adopting a policy regarding disruption of telephonic or internet service during public meetings; making findings regarding compliance with Senate Bill 707 (2025) and Government Code Section 54953.4; and establishing procedures for continued remote public access.
Ayes (5)
Councilmember Saemann, Councilmember Jackson, Mayor Detoy, Councilmember Francois, and Mayor Pro Tem Keegan Motion Carried
18. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Public Comments:
Councilmember Saemann requested a future agenda item to review the Public Works Commission appointment process. Councilmember Francois seconded support for the item. Two votes of support were noted.
Councilmember Jackson requested support for a future agenda item directing staff to retain an independent third-party consultant to conduct an operational review of all city departments, paired with a series of study sessions to consider findings in advance of the FY 2027-28 budget process. Did not receive additional support.
18.a
TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-040
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. STAFF REPORT - TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA 6-23-26 - 26-CMO-040.pdf
2. Attachment 1. Tentative Future Agenda.pdf
Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.
This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.
19. CITY MANAGER REPORT
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. SUPPLEMENTAL Presentation for Item 19.pdf
City Manager Napolitano reported that fireworks are illegal in Hermosa Beach and that violations carry fines of up to $5,000, which would be enforced. He encouraged residents to attend professional fireworks displays in the South Bay and to enjoy the holiday weekend responsibly.
20. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Public Comments:
This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken.
20.a
ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 21, 2026 Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Action minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 21, 2026.pdf This item was received and filed by order of the Chair.
20.b
OVERTIME ANALYSIS
Attachments
|
Public Comments
1. Memo-Overtime Analysis.pdf
City Manager Steve Napolitano and Police Chief Landon Phillips responded to City Council questions.
21. ADJOURNMENT
Public Comments:
At 9:23 p.m., Mayor Detoy adjourned the meeting and provided a reminder that Council would be dark on July 14, 2026, and the next Regular City Council meeting would be Tuesday, July 28, 2026, with Closed Session at 5:00 p.m. and Open Session at 6:00 p.m.