ATTACHMENT 1
City of Hesperia
2025 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
CITY COUNCIL
Allison Lee, Mayor
Cameron Gregg, Mayor Pro Tem
Brigit Bennington, Council Member
Chris Ochoa, Council Member
Josh Pullen, Council Member
9700 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia, CA 92345. 760-947-1018. www.cityofhesperia.us
2025 Legislative Platform Page 1 of 27
2025 Legislative Platform Process
Purpose
The Legislative Platform provides a means for summarizing the City’s core legislative principles to support advocacy efforts at the reg ional, state, and federal level. Recognizing the importance of promotin g City priorities and legislative initiatives, the legislative platform focuses on the City’s commitment to service, community, and economic development initiatives. Adopted annually, the Legislative Platform serves as a reference guide for urgent reques ts of support, opposition, or neutrality of a legislative p roposal and provides direction for the City Council and staff throughout the year.
Guiding Principles
1. Preserve and Enhance Local Control
Support measures that preserve and protect the City’s loca l authority to enact policy pertaining to local affairs. Oppose measures that seek to preempt local control without the concurrence of the City.
2. Maintain Fiscal Responsibility
Support measures that promote fiscal stability, predictability, and financial independence at the local level. Support efforts that preserve and promote the City’s ab ility to maintain and grow its revenue base. Oppose measures that diminish the Cit y’s revenue sou rces thereby threatening its ability to provide and maintain critical services.
3. Promote Economic Development
Support legislative efforts that are designed to provide local governments with the tools necessary to bolster economic development. Support legislation and regulatory streamlining initiatives that would enhance th e City’s ability to attract and retain businesses as well as encourage business expansion and job retention.
4. Support Funding Opportunities
Support measures that allow the City to compet e for its fair share of regional, state , and federal funding including competitive grants and other funding programs . Support initiatives that promote dedicated funding streams to cities for critical service areas.
5. Collaborate with Regional Partners
Support opportunities to work collaboratively with local and regional part ners on areas of mutual interest. Maintain strong relationships with other municipalities, local transportation agencies, special districts, regional government agencies, local elected officials, school districts, and college boards.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 2 of 27
Goals and Objectives
The primary objective is for the City Council to adopt official City positions on clearly stated legislative issues and to adopt a guideline for funding priorities at the start of the l egislative session. The Legislative Platform also sets forth the City’ s legislative objectives for the 2025 legislative session and provides direction for our legislative advocates as they work to secure clear and strategic initiatives in Sac ramento and Wa shington, D.C. By doing this, the legislative approval process is stre amlined by e liminating the need for repetitive concurrence and direction from the City Council on previously approved issues.
A secondary objective is to implement a process that ensures the City Council provides input and direction on legislative issues that have not been previously reviewed by the City Council. This objective will ensure that staff will seek the Council’s guidance on issues that are not contained within the City’s ado pted legislative platform.
With the dynamic growth of the City over the years an d planned development in the future, the City’s Legislative Platform is aimed at securing legislative policies and resources that will help the City manage this growth, fund critical infrastructure needs, keep the City safe and maintain and enhance the quality-of- life residents have come to enjoy.
Process
The following outlines the process that is used to develop and implement the various elements of the City of Hesperia’s Legislative Platform:
1. Develop Legislative Policy Statements
Each year, the City Manager’s Office submits the Legislat ive Platform with its proposed S tate and Federal Legislative Policy Statements compiled in accordance with the following:
a. Input from Senior Management and City’s legislative advocates. b. Research of current law and pending legislation.
c. A review of legislative priorities and any other issues recommended by the League of California Cities, the National League of Cities, the City’s legislative ad vocates, or any other agencies conducting legislative analysis and advocacy on behalf of cities. d. City’s adopted Mission Statement and Values.
e. Consideration of special, unique, or changing interests of the City of Hesperia.
Staff will use the 2025 Legislative Policy Statements as a guiding policy when reviewing and analyzing bills that have an impact on the City’s interests. The City will have discretion in determining on which specific bills to take official position . Official City positio ns are not aut omatically assumed on bills simply due to their similarity with the p olicy stateme nts contained within this document. Furthermore, the policies established within the platform do not preclude City Council consideration of additional legislative matters arising throughout the year that may be brought forward for City Council action.
2. Legislative Monitoring and Advocacy
The City Council recognizes that it is vital to the fiscal health and self- determination of the City to effectively communicate with state legislators and federal representatives in order to favorably influence state and f ederal legislation, regulations, and funding requests. Legislative Advocates at the f ederal and
2025 Legislative Platform Page 3 of 27
state levels provide a useful service in the success of the City ’s legislative goals and objectives by providing the necessary communication link w ith our Congressional Delegation and State Legislators to further Hesperia’s priority projects for funding consideration. To that end, funding for Legislative Advocates will be considered by the City Council on an annual basis.
Upon the Legislative Platf orm’s adoption, the City Manager’s Office will exercise day -to-day oversight of legislative matters. Staff will monitor and review state and f ederal legislation as well as write letters, contact legislators, or otherwise communicate the City’s position, as warranted. T he City Manager is authorized to send such letters on adopted legislative positions, along the following lines:
• Support: Legislation that the City should support as drafted. • Oppose: Legislation that the City should oppose as drafted. • Oppose Unless Amended: Legislation the City should oppose unless amended. • No Position or Watch: Legislation that the City does not take a formal position on but continues to monitor for progress.
3. Staff Responsibilities in the Legislative Process
In addition to coordinating formal action through the City Council, City staff responsibilities in the implementation of the Legislative Platform include:
1. Prepare support/opposition analyses and correspondence.
2. Seek and solicit support/opposition from other interested entities.
3. Participate in and attend legislative meetings with legislators and staff, as well as other local public officials and staff, to actively engage and stay apprised of legislative trends and upcoming legislation.
4. Prepare and present testimony on behalf of the City before the state and federal government.
5. Monitor and track key bills through the legislative process utilizing the City’s advocacy services, legislative websites, and government/professional associations.
6. Update the City Council on l egislation that the City has taken a position on, including any significant amendments that would impact the City’s adopted positions.
7. Ensure City Council Members receive copies of all legislative correspondence.
8. Work with City’s f ederal and state lobbyist s to identify fu nding resources for departmental projects.
4. City Council Role in the Legislative Process
Through adoption of the Legislative Platform, the City Council prohibits any of its members from lobbying, advocating, or taking a position contrary to the Council’s adopted position on any legislative item. Council Members may, as allowed for by law, take opposing positions as an individual citizen; however, said communication is discouraged and considered detrimental to the success of the City and thi s Legislative Platform specifically.
Written correspondence by individual City Council Members on legislative items not adopted by the City Council may be transmitted if the correspondence identifies that it is a position as an individual citizen as opposed to an elected official of the City of Hesperia. Any individual correspondence must be on personal stationery that is free of any City of Hesperia identifying information, including logos, addresses, phone numbers, etc.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 4 of 27
City Council Members may be as ked to participate in meetings with legislators and staff, as well as other local public officials. Council Members may also be asked to present testimony on behalf of the City before the state and federal government. Council Members will be provided copies of all correspondence related to the City’s activities in the legislative process.
When proposed legislation, or a significant public policy issue, comes to th e attention of City officials that is not specifically addressed in the Legislative Platform, it may be brought to the Council for consideration.
If the Council determines that the proposed legislation or policy issue is of importance to the City, it will recommend that a f ormal position on the matter be taken, which may include adoption of a Ci ty Council Resolution.
5. Identify Funding Priorities
Each year, Senior Management provides input on funding priorities for the City’s major infrastructure projects. These projects and programs are identified and listed in the annual Legislative Platform and once approved by Co uncil, become the basis for preparing the City’s annual Legislative Priorities book. The Legislative Priorities book is the vehicle by which f ederal and s tate r epresentatives are provided information on the City’s top priority projects for which the City seeks funding.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 5 of 27
2025 City Council Funding Priorities
T
ransportation
City Wide Pavement Restoration
In 2024, t he City conducted a c itywide pavement anal ysis c itywide that allo ws f or a methodic categorization o f s treets t o establish a P avement M anagement P rogram. The P avement Condition I ndex (PCI) is a s napshot of t he c onditions of the roadway ran ging f rom 10 0 (b rand new) to 0 (complete fa ilure). Asphalt c an f ail for a variety o f re asons, s uch as : age, wear, or failure of material. There are varying levels of treatment that can be used to extend the lift of the asphalt such a s slurry s eal o r overlays , b ut af ter roadways reach a PCI o f 55 or less they deteriorate a t a m uch faster r ate a nd th e more affordable r ehabilitation methods no long er work. The City mu st resort to full reconstruction of the asphalt , where the asphalt and the b ase material are re moved and replaced. Fu ll reconstruction costs are approximately $1 million p er mile, to a ccount for c onstruction c osts, a nd review of t he as phalt de sign section to e nsure it meets the current City needs for traffic loads.
In the most recent PCI survey of roads almost 15% fall below a PCI of 45 within the City limits.
The City has approximately 500 miles of asphalt roadway, meaning approximately 75 miles are failing over the next 10 to 20 years. The City is looking for $125 million over the next 15 years to set up a program to replace the deteriorating roadway sections, a ssist with public safety and upgrade d esign sections to meet the current needs of the community.
Main Street Widening and Aqueduct Bridge Construction
Three heavily congested corridors a re all that exist in the City of Hesperia (City) to move traffic east-west through the Ci ty. To improve circulation, Main Street will be widened from the Interstate 15 (I-15) to Eleventh Avenue from four lanes to six lanes with center turn lanes and an additional aqueduct bridge crossing adjace nt to the existing bridge will be constructed consistent with the California Department of Water R esources (DWR) bridge requirements. The project will enhance capacity of the roadway by more than 30% and t o include raised medians to restrict traffic movements a nd a three-l ane bridge together with shoulder, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and aqueduct safety features.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 6 of 27
The project will improve the critically needed east-west traffic circulation, improve air quality b y reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improve safety and safety response times for emergency vehicles, provide efficient connectivity for residents and business centers , create jobs, increase use of non- motorized transportation systems, and faci litate growt h. The project will alleviate current congestion along Main Street that is anticipated to worsen due to growth. The wide ning will achieve the ultimate configuration of Main Street wh ich is classified as a Major Arterial Roadway in the City’s Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Total project cost is approximately $ 20.73 million for Main Street widening and approximately $11.1 million for aqueduct bridge construction. The City intends to deliver the project in three (3) phases with each phase to taling about $10 million. The first phase would be the construction of the aqueduct bridge. The goal for the construction of the Main Street improvements is $25 million in grant funding. The City will advocate for funding for the Main Street Widening pro ject from a variety of state and federal sources.
Bear Valley Road Rehabilitation and Widening Project
Bear Valley Road, between Interstate 15 (I -15) and the Mojave River, carries more traffic volume than any ot her roadway in the High Desert. The roadway is shared with the City of Victorville; the north half is located and maintained by Victorville while the south half is located and maintained by the City of Hesperia. The roadway is the primary entrance to the Town of App le Valley. The route also serves as the primary access to t he City ’s large industrial area. The roadway contains three eastbound travel lanes but many areas along the street frontage are not fully improved. A large majority of the properties fronting Bea r Valley Road are vacant, and roadway improvements are still to be constructed.
The City desires to partner with the City of Victorville and construct missing curb, gutter, sidewalk, and bi ke lanes along both sides of the roadw ay together with pavement r ehabilitation to keep this vital roadway in good condition. Like other roadway improvement projects, the project will improve air quality by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improve safety and response times for emergency vehi cles, provide efficient connectivity for residents and busi ness centers, create jobs, increase use of non- motorized transportation systems, and facilitate growth. The project is consistent with the City’s Circulation Plan of the General Plan.
Total project cost is $ 4.2 million. The City’s goal is to acquire $ 3.9 million in grants and $0.3 million of local funds to complete the project. The City continues to advocate for funding for the project from a variety of state and federal grant sources.
Traffic Signals
Traffic signals are valuable devices for the control of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. They assign the right-of-way to the various traffic movements and thereby profoundly influence traffic flow.
Traffic signals that are properly designed, located, operated, and maintaine d have one or more of the following advantages:
• They provide for the orderly movement of traffic.
• They increase the traffic-handling capacity of the intersection if:
2025 Legislative Platform Page 7 of 27
a. Proper physical layouts and control measures are used; and b. The signal operational parameters are reviewed and upd ated (if needed) on a regular bas is (as engin eering judgement determines that significant traffic flow and/or land use changes have occurred) to maximize the ability of the traffic control signal to satisfy current traffic demands.
• They reduce the frequenc y and severity of certain types o f crashes, especially right-angle collisions.
• They are coordinated to provide for continuous or nearly continuous movement of traffic at a definite speed along a given route under favorable conditions. • They are used to inte rrupt heavy traffic at intervals to permit ot her traffic, vehicular or pedestrian, to cross.
The Traffic Signal project focuses on two intersections in the City that has exceeded the collision threshold whic h warrants traffic signal installation. A traffic signal will be installed at the following intersection:
• Escondido Avenue and Sultana Street
• Seventh Avenue and Sequoia Street
These intersections currently experience a low Level of Service (LOS) w hich falls below general circulation plan go als coupled with numerous collisions. The proj ect will potentially reduce all types of collisions and increase public safety.
Total project cost is estimated at $3 million for each signal installation totaling $6 million with the City advocating for $1 million in grant funding from a variety of state and federal sources.
I Avenue Widening
I Avenue connects a large residential area to commercial services in the Cit y of Hesperia. It contains both horizontal and vertical sight distance deficiencies.
To improve these safety deficiencies, I Avenue will be widened between Ranchero Road and Bear Valley Road, approximately 6.4 miles. I Avenue is currently a north- south two -lane ro adway terminating at Ranchero Road in the south and Bear Valley Road in the north . I Avenue is classified as a four -lane divided Arterial with a center turn lane for its entire length. The project will create a community vision that prioritizes safety improvements for all roadway users addressing safety concerns, trav el patterns, and in frastructure. The City recently completed a planning study funded through Caltrans’ Sustain able Transportation Planning Grant. The study identified improvement segments and segment costs.
The project will focus on the following goals:
1. Provide increase d capacity to improve safety conditions for both motorized and non- motorized users.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 8 of 27
2. Create a healthy, livable, and sustainable c ommunity by providing complete streets, thereby increasing walking, bi king, and tran sit trips while also reduc ing greenhouse gas emissions.
3. Improve public transit services for the entire community.
4. Connect Hesperia's r esidents to destinations that bridge the healthca re divide, provide education opportunities, and provide access to spur economic growth.
5. Promote commerce and economic vitality by facilitating goods movement along I Avenue and improving efficiency.
6. Involve the community in developing a long -term prioritiz ed strategy and plan for promoting reliable and efficient mobility for people, goods, and services.
The total project cost is estimated at $ 63.1 million. Segments are:
1. Segment 1 – Ranchero Road to Danbury Avenue
2. Segment 2 – Danbury Avenue to Redbud Street
3. Segment 3 – Redbud Street to Hercules Street
4. Segment 4 – Hercules Street to “E” Street
5. Segment 5 – “E” Street to Catalpa Street
6. Segment 6 – Catalpa Street to Bear Valley Road
The City will endeavor to construct improvements in segments. The City has elected to construct Segments two (2) and three (3) initi ally to address traffic congestion, safe ro utes to schools, and to increase safety. These segments are estimated at $ 16.5 million. The City will pursue $ 12 million in grant funding fro m a variety of state and federal sources and match the amount wit h local funds of $4.5 million.
Sultana Street, Muscatel Street, and Cedar Street (Mariposa Road to Escondido Avenue) Street Improvements
Over the past couple of decades, residential developmen t has occurred in the area generally bounded by Ma in Street to t he North, the California Aqueduct to the Eas t, Cedar Street to the South, and Mariposa Road to the West. It is anticipated that growth in the area will continue in the future. The area conta ins a large wash (A- 04 Drainage Corridor) that pre vents these developments from having improved access to Mariposa Road. To gain access to the Main Street commercial corridor and/or to Interstate 15 (I -15), residents primari ly use Escondido Avenue as alternate improved routes are not available. All east bound routes a re terminated at the California Aqueduct. T hese conditions have created significant traffic congestion both along Main Street and Escondido Avenue in addition to safety concerns.
The City desires to construct three roadway connections along Sultana Stre et, Muscatel Street, and Cedar Street togeth er with roadway widening along Mariposa Road to facilitate traffic
2025 Legislative Platform Page 9 of 27
movements to both the Main Street commercial corri dor and to Interstate 15 (I-15) and Highway 395. The City will collaborate with San Bernardino County and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to complete the project. The work will include construction of drainage system improvements so that s torm water will continue to be c onveyed along the A -04 wash under the new roadway s to the north east, embankment construction that must compl y with State Division of Dam Safety requirements, and two -lane roadways along each street together with roadway imp rovements along Mariposa Road th at will include widening to four lanes, a center t urning lane, pavement rehabilitation, and traffic signals a t each intersection. The roadways will also include pedestrian sidewalks and bike lanes to encourage non -motorized transportation.
Like other roadway improvement projects, the project will improv e air quality by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improv e safety and response times for em ergency vehicles, provide efficient connectivity for residents and business centers, create jobs, increase use of non- motorized transportation systems, and facilitate growth. Th e project is consistent with the City's Circulation Plan of the General Plan.
Total project cost is $2 3.5 million. The City 's goal is to acquire $ 23 million in grants and $ 1.5 million of local funds to complete the project. The City continues to advocate for funding for the project from a variety of state and federal grant sources.
North-South Corridor Improvements
Between the California Aqueduct and the B urlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad c orridor, the City lacks any improved major arter ial between Ranchero Road, soon to be improved to a five - lane roadway, and Bear Valley Road, the busiest roadway in the High Desert. The City wants to study the area to determ ine which corridors should be i mproved to facilitate access to and from the north and south en ds of the City . Routes to be considered inclu de Hesperia Road, Seventh Street, Cottonwood Avenue and Maple Avenue.
The roadway, consistent with the City ’s Circulation Plan, will be widened to five lanes which will include two travel lanes in each directi on, a center tur n-lane, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and traffic signals. Like other roadway improvement projects, the project will improve air quali ty by reducing greenhouse gas emissio ns, improve safety and response times for emergen cy vehicles, p rovide efficient connectivity for residents a nd business centers, create jobs, increase use of non-motorized transportation systems, and facilitate growth.
The estimated cost to study these co rridors is estimated at $ 1 million. The City’s goal is to fund the entire project with grant funding. T he City continues to advocate for funding for the project from a variety of state and federal grant sources.
Escondido Bridge
With limited access points over the aqueduct, the City is a lways looking for methods to move traffic away fro m already congested i ntersections. A new br idge extending Escondido Avenue north of Main Street to connect Mariposa will not only help alleviate traffic going north through the City off of Main Street, but will also help to open a currently undeveloped commercial area within the City near the freeway. This can help to bring in additional opportunities for economic
2025 Legislative Platform Page 10 of 27
development as well as utilizing properties that are viewable from the I15 freeway . This bridge has been identified within the City’s Circulation Plan as a locatio n that would be beneficial to the community as well.
The estimated cost to design and build this project is estimated at $18 million. The City ’s goal is to fund the project with grant funding. The City continues to advocate for funding for the project from a variety of state and federal grant sources.
Ranchero Corridor Project – Phase IV
It is anticipated that roadway improvements will generally be within the project limits of Danbury Avenue to I Avenue. Preliminary eng ineering will need to be condu cted to determine the roadway improvements being implemented under this project.
The estimated cost of this project is $ 11.7 million.
Flood Control
Cataba Road Basin
The City of Hesperia experiences storm -related flooding and sediment transport through out the City. In particular, the Oro Grande Wash conveys runoff from over 30 square miles to the Mojave River. The focus of the subject project is the area just upstream of the California Aqueduct.
There are two existing box culverts under the aqueduct that restrict flow. The drainage tributary is 4,969 acres that generates a 100 -year peak flow rate of 1,671 cubic feet per second (cfs) . The City has received numerous complai nts from the State of California’s Department of Water Resources (DWR) regarding sediment and debris accumulation. The primary concern from DWR is if such accumulati ons block the culvert system, its system may be impacted preventing state water project de liveries to millions of Southern Californians. DWR indicates that it expends approximately $35,000 annually to ensure the system is appropriately maintained.
To address these concerns, the City proposes to constr uct the Cataba Road Basin to be located immediately upstream of the Aqueduct crossing to capture sediment and debris fo r proper disposal. The pr oject includes planning, design, environmental review, site a cquisition, permitting, and construction of a detention facility together with related fac ilities (e.g. inlet and outlet structures and emergency spillway). The Basin will accommodate large flows reducing peak flow rates while capturing sediment and debris . The project consists of an inlet spillway system leading into the basin through energy di ssipaters, a low flow outlet, and storm drain connection to the existing dual culverts.
Total estimated project cost is $ 11 million and the City’s CIP budget assumes $6,22 7,250 of the cost.
Temecula Avenue Basin
The City of Hesperia experiences storm related flooding and sediment transport throughout the City. To ad dress these concerns, the City proposes to con struct the Temecula Avenue Basin located northwest of the Arrowhead Lake Road and Mono Drive intersection. Sediment bui ld-up
2025 Legislative Platform Page 11 of 27
occurs in the downstream storm drain systems. The Temecula Basin will accommodate larg e flows reducing peak flow rates while captur ing sediment. The project consists of constructing an inlet headwall loc ated along the existing creek and leading into a series of two basins with a combined storage capacity of 39 acre-feet together. Water wil l flow from the 26 -acre-foot basin to the 13 -acre-foot basin through an outlet spillway. The 13 -acre-foot basin will t hen discharge storm water through a low flow ou tlet and storm d rain connecting to the existing 96 feet of storm drain located approximately 280 feet north of the Arrowhead Lake Road and Mono Drive intersection.
The project will enhance flood protection by eliminating flooding along Arrowhead Lake Road , reducing maintenance costs, improving local water supplies, improving local water quality , and reducing sediment transport to the Mojave River.
Total project cost is estimated at $ 4.2 million. The aggregat e goal for construction of the Temecula Avenue Basin is $3.5 million in grant funding.
A-04 Corridor Flood Protection Program
Prior to th e City of Hesperia’s incorporation in 1988 , development o ccurred that only included minor alterations to natural topo graphy. As a result, natural drainage cours es meander through developed areas, and streets follow the natural contours of the land, often without culverts or bridges across drainag e channels. Th is leads to localized flooding, property damage, road closures, erosion damage, negative economic impact s, and significant s ediment and debris accumulation even during moderate storm events. To addr ess the drainage conditions along the A-04 corridor, one of the many corridors, the City will construct various flood control improvements including basins and c onveyance pipelines. During moderate storm events, flooding occurs all along the entire drainag e corridor. The project includes plannin g, design, site acquisition, permitting, construction of basins, and convey ance pipeli nes between basins. The basins have the potential to also be used for recharge of imported and recycled water.
The project will enhance flood pr otection for nearly 10 miles of developed, and to be developed, areas in the cities of Hesperia an d Victorville. These areas are or will b e developed with commercial and residential land uses. In addition, the flooding area includes several major arterials. The project will also improve water supply management to the High Desert region.
Total project cost is $50 million. The City will advocate for $35 million in funding from a variety of state and federal sources and pursue all eligible funding sourc es. As development comes into the A-04 watershed, developers will contribute the construction of i nfrastructure or land as needed to protect their properties.
Mesa Area Septic to Sewer
To protect groundwater quality, the City is proposing to expand its existing wastewater collection system to provide service to convert onsite wastewater treatment syst ems to the sewer system.
The wastewater will be treated, and effluent will be recyc led for irrigation uses and aquifer recharge.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 12 of 27
The Mesa a rea is one of the highest density communities i n the City of He speria. Local construction of a system is cost prohibitive. In addition, the existing high- density onsite disposal systems are impacting aquifer water quality, the only water supply source for the City . The project will provide sewer service to this high-density area protecting aquifer water quality.
The pr oject will be delivered in phases which include construction of the P each Avenue lift station together with force mains and gravity sewers as well as a phase that includes local gravity sewers and septic to sewer conversions. The total project cost is $80 million. The project cost per phase will be $10 million for each in dividual phase. The City will pursue project funding from a variety of state and federal sources in multiple funding cycles.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 13 of 27
2025 State Legislative Policy Statements
The following categories of policy statements are broad and are not intended to be all- inclusive, rather they will be used as a reference tool and guideline for the City’s State advocacy efforts in 2025.
Administrative Services
General Area of Review: Elections, Brown Act, Public Records Act, Political Reform Act, Conflict of Interest, Insurance, Tort Reform, Open and Transparent Government.
1. Support a comprehensive state performance r eview an d a udit system and l ong-range financial planning and performance budgeting to enhance accountability, efficiency, and responsiveness at all levels of government.
2. Support legislation that controls the costs of elections as long as the elections proc ess is n ot adversely affect ed, (e.g., purge voter rolls, limit costs for candidate statements, and prevent abuse of the mail ballot process).
3. Support legislation that woul d increase voter turnout in local elections, (e.g., mail ballots, more information to voters for judicial elections).
4. Support legislation that reduces the amount of recall abuse while improving, streamlining , and ensuring that the public has full knowledge of the issues.
5. Support legislation that strengthens local control over election -related matters such as boun dary and district requirements.
6. Support measu res that enable cities to maximize their ability to administer local elections, including programs designed to encourage and increase voter education, registration, and voter turn-out efficiently and effectively.
7. Support reforms to modernize the structure, governance, management, and method of financing State government.
8. Support legislation that discourage s baseless and frivolous claims and demands made against municipalities, their officers, and employees.
9. Support legislation that would allow a City presented wit h an allegation of a violation of the California Voter Rights Act (CVRA) to addr ess the allegation before any person may file a lawsuit related to the alleged violation.
10. Support legislation providing City Council more flexibility to fill City Council vacancies including extending the appointment period to fill a vacancy.
11. Support limi ted tort liabili ty and provide certain tort immunities for public entities for unauthorized use of public property.
12. Support comprehensive tort reform, including limitin g the jo int and separate liability of governmental agencies to a liability equal to their percentage of their wrongdoing.
13. Support measures that preserve the integrity and fundamental s of the Brown Act while opposing measures that would constrain communication among staff and local officials.
14. Support measures increasing loc al autonomy, prote cting privacy , and maintaining the City ’s authority over public records. This includes measures t hat provide for the recovery of costs with regard to public records requests.
15. Support efforts to amend rules that limit and restrict local governments’ ability to achieve greater transparency of governmental business by improving the platform in which agencies can publish and advertise notices, resolutions, orders, or other matters required by law.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 14 of 27
16. Support measures that promote tr ansparency, public participation, and first ame ndment rights, while preserving procedures that continue to foster efficient government proceedings.
17. Support alternative methods of meeting public notice requirem ents and enhancing them using cost effective and innovative, technology friendly methods of communication.
18. Support legislation that maintains and enhances local franchising au thority for cable television and wireless services.
19. Oppose l egislation th at expands or increases municipal liability , or, convers ely, further limits municipal immunity.
20. Oppose legislation that limits the author ity of municipalities to enforce their own ordinances in municipal courts.
21. Oppose any legislation that diminishes or does not assure local franchise fees for all utilities’ us e of City right-of- way.
22. Oppose legislative eff orts to impose binding arbitration that w ould remove local government authority on matters of local interest. Specifically, sup port all legislative and leg al efforts to overturn any legislation that implements binding arbitration on local government.
23. Oppose legislation that seeks to lessen the City’s ability to enforce contractual language agreed to and contained within existing franchise documents.
Economic Development
General Area of Review: Economic Devel opment, Redevelopment, Enterprise and Opportuni ty Zones, Job Creation.
1. Support r egional and sustainable economic development policies that promote planned economic growth in Hesperia and neighboring communities.
2. Support legislation that enhances the City’s ability to attract retain, and expand local businesses through job creation, investment incentives and infrastructure development
3. Support legislation that provides financial and regulatory incentives ( e.g., tax benefits, grants, low-interest loans) to rehabilitate residential and commercial prope rties, improve infrastructure, and enhance economic vitality.
4. Support policies that foster entrepreneurship, business formation and growth.
5. Support legis lation t hat promotes the reshoring of manufa cturing and in centivizes domestic supply chain development, including workforce training and infrastructure improvements.
6. Support state and f ederal policies that maximize the benefits of Opportunity Zones , in cluding streamlined regulatory processes, environmental flexibility and expanded investment incentives.
7. Support legislation ensuring that assets from former redevelopment agencies remain under local control to benefit redevelopment areas and eliminate blight.
8. Support legislation that refines prevailing wage requirements to reduce unnecessary cost burdens on economic development and affordable housing projects.
9. Support polic ies that encourage balanced residential and commercial development, with incentives for mixed -use projects an d strategic gr owth west of I -15, including e commerce, distribution centers and logistics hubs.
10. Advocate for infrastructure improvements, including roa dways, transit, and utilities, to support economic growth.
11. Support workf orce d evelopment programs , including job train ing and partnerships with local schools, colleges, and trade organizations to align workforce skills with economic needs.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 15 of 27
12. Oppose legislation that negatively impacts local businesses , economic developme nt, or job creation.
13. Oppose legislation that restricts responsible housing development and reduces economic opportunities.
14. Oppose policies that lead to a declin e in property values , economic stagnation, or disinvestment in the City.
15. Oppose legislation that would contribute to a decrease in property values within the City.
Employee Relations and Risk Management
General Area of Review: Labor Relations, Employee Relations, and Human Resources.
1. Support legislation that would reform the State’s Workers’ Compensation Sys tem to draw a balance b etween reasonable claimant benefits versus the increasing costs/corruption that has plagued the System to date.
2. Support legisl ation that imp roves access to, an d reduces the cost of, healthcare for public employees.
3. Support legislation that expands the City ’s ability to offer health, welfare , and wellness services for employees.
4. Support reform of the California tort law system to curtail unreas onable liability ex posure for municipalities and to facilitate the ability to obtain affordab le ge neral liability an d wo rkers’ compensation insurance coverage.
5. Support local government efforts to establish succession planning and mentoring programs.
6. Support efforts to provid e additional flexibility in the provision and administration of retirement and medical benefit programs while ensuring those programs are sustainable for past, current, and future employees.
7. Oppose the taxability of employee benefits.
8. Oppose legislation that would add administrative burdens or taxes to self-insurance programs.
9. Oppose legislation or re gulations that would increase employer medical costs for workers’ compensation.
10. Oppose legislation that would promote workers’ compensation claim litigation.
11. Oppose legislation that presumptively expands workers’ compensation coverage to illness or injuries that are not work-related.
12. Oppose legislation that creates unnecessary burdens o n or l imits the City ’s a bility to decide employment issues, including collective bargaining, binding arbitration, benefits, and leaves.
13. Oppose legislat ion i mposing state-mandated costs for mandatory employee training programs when there is no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefits.
14. Oppose legislation that would cr eate additional financial burden on, or threaten the viability of, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS).
Environmental
General Area of Review: Air, Wa ter and Water Quality, Climate Change, CEQA , Energy Effic iency, Recycling, Solid Waste Management, Hazardous Materials, and Utilities.
1. Support legislation that pr omotes regi onal improvement of air quality, recognizing that air pollution does not follow jurisdictional boundaries.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 16 of 27
2. Support legislation to assure that federal, state, and county agencies have adequate authority and resources to enforce air quality regulations.
3. Support legislation and regulations that provide authority for local governments to im plement vehicle emissions reductions programs.
4. Support legislation requiring local government participation on the governing bodies of air quality management districts without diluting any existing authority already held by the City.
5. Support efforts that maintain and enhance local decision-making authority in the development and implementation of air quality attainment strategies.
6. Support water quality l egislation that results in reasonable water quality control regulations that are cost effective and can show identifiable benefits.
7. Support region al approaches to provide needed wa ter and encourage local conservation and efficient use of the water supply.
8. Support legislation and regulations that promote the appropriate and beneficial use of reclaimed water.
9. Support continued federal and state funding for water and wastewater treatm ent infrastructure to reduce local costs and expedite construction of necess ary treatment, distri bution, and collection facilities to comply with federal and state mandates.
10. Support efforts that help local governments main tain water efficiency programs that meet state objectives, are cost effective, and make sense for the local conditions.
11. Support sta te a nd federal efforts to increase water efficiency ratings for common consumer products that use water.
12. Support streamlined environmental processing for f ederal and state regulatory permits administered by Caltrans and various other stat e and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure developments.
13. Support major revisions to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and its state counterpart, i ncluding delisting of endangered species that have thrived and recovered thr ough effective resource management.
14. Support legislation to include consideration of the economic impact s of proposed species listings, as well as support the delisting of species no longer threatened or endangered.
15. Support efforts to streamline and improve the California Environme ntal Quality Act (CEQA ) process to reduce time and cost of compliance while ensuring that the environment is adequately protected.
16. Support “green” projects and regulations that do not place an undue burden on local government and other financial incentives for reductions in Greenhouse Gases.
17. Support programs and policies that promote ad vanced low emiss ion v ehicle technology and encourage or promote alternative fuels such as biodiesel, hydrogen, and compressed natural gas.
18. Support le gislation that increases availability and promo tes the ad option of energy efficient technologies and use of alternative/renewable energy sources.
19. Support legislation that encourages and funds energy eff iciency and conservation while allowing local design and implementation of the program.
20. Support loca l govern ment’s adopt ion and implementation of recycled conte nt and green procurement policies.
21. Support legislation to provide changes to AB 939 regarding mandated waste diversion goals that will streamline its provisions and assist in compliance, placing more emphasis on implementation of waste diversion programs and less on strict mathematical accounting.
22. Support l egislation th at delays or reduces pe nalties fo r noncompliance with SB 1383 to allow jurisdictions to implement the many components of the regulations.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 17 of 27
23. Support fund ing for implementation of SB 1383 includ ing funding t o i ncrease the capaci ty of facilities th at accept, and process organic waste and fundi ng increase the capacity of food recovery services and organizations.
24. Support legislation that cl arifies and broadens the regulatory authority of local government to ensure the efficient management of recyclable material and solid waste.
25. Support legislatio n that provides incentives and funding for program s that promote waste reduction, reuse, and recycling and development of related infrastructure.
26. Support expansion of the market for recyclable materials.
27. Support legislation that allows the City to continue controlling risks from hazardous materials use, storage and transportatio n through the Uniform B uilding and Fire Cod es an d related local amendments.
28. Oppose legislation that would require the Cit y to divert more than 50 percent of the solid waste stream and places undue burden on local government.
29. Oppose legislation that requires the City to reduce the amou nt of organic was te by 5 0 to 75 percent and requires disposed edible food to be used for h uman consumption accompanied by infrastructure, procurement, and implementat ion requirements which places a fin ancial burden on local government.
30. Oppose mand ated mat erial disposal ban s or r estrictions in circumstances where there is an insufficient capacity within the private recycling market to handle these materi als in a more beneficial way besides landfilling.
31. Oppose legislation that restricts the City ’s ab ility to adopt local regulations for hazardous materials, including review and approval of the loc ation of facilities that use or store hazardous materials or hazardous waste.
32. Oppose air quality legislation that restricts a local agency’s land use authority.
33. Oppose all state and/or federal legislation that would allow for lower w ater quality testing limits based on any other parameters than scientific evidence.
34. Oppose legislation that would impose a tax on res idential water service c ustomers, including requirements characterized as voluntary contributions.
35. Oppose the expansion of the State listing of endangered or threatened species without economic impact analyses and valid scientific data.
36. Oppose any addition al listings to the Calif ornia Endangered Specie s Act wh en such l istings threaten development and the local economy and impo se an undue financial burden on loca l agencies.
37. Oppose all unfunded mandates on local governments to address climate change (which is outside the City’s control).
38. Oppose expanding the cur rent unfunded mandate to meet Environmental Protecti on Agency regulations aimed at the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
Grants and Funding
General Area of Review: Competitive, Discretionary, Formulaic Sources of Funding f or Capital Projects and Operations.
1. Support and pursue funding for projects that improve the quality of life in Hesperia.
2. Support and pursue funding to increase public safety service levels in the City and unincorporated areas.
3. Support measures that al low the C ity to compete for its fair share of regional, state and federal funding.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 18 of 27
4. Support initiatives that promote dedicated funding streams to cities for critical service areas.
5. Support legislation that provid es incentives or grant opportunities for comm unity improvements such as cultural services for the education, entertainment, and enrichment of the community.
6. Support tax credits, grants, loans , and other incentives to assist the public, businesses, and loca l agencies that invest in energy efficient eq uipment a nd technology, and fuel efficient, low emission vehicles.
7. Support and pursue funding that specifically benefits the City ’s transportation and publ ic works projects, including for new railroad grade crossings.
8. Support legislation or policy, whethe r state o r federal, that creates and makes available grant funds for economic development and tax increment financing (TIF) programs.
9. Support legislation th at maintains or enhances funding for parks, trails, and recreation services and facilities.
10. Support legislation that provides funding for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrast ructure; flood prev ention, water resources planning and development; water q uality improvement; and water resources related regulatory reform.
11. Support legislation that provides sustainable funding support for disaster preparedness, Homeland Security, Court Security and other local emergency management and law enforcement activities.
12. Support legi slation that addresses full reimbursemen t of law enforcement co sts of state and federal mandates.
13. Support legislation that ensures communities of all sizes remain e ligible for funding, not just large urban areas or communities identified through overly prescriptive eligibility criteria.
14. Support legislation that direc ts proceeds from cap -and-trade auction revenues to projects in the City that resu lt in improved air quality, active modes of transporta tion, and the reduction of harmful pollutants.
15. Support legislation that provides funding and resou rces for local governme nts to implement Healthy Cities programs and policies aimed at reducing obesity, childhood obesity, high rates of diabetes, heart disease, and other health conditions.
16. Support legislation that provides funding t o implement unfunded mandates such as the organi c waste reduction mandates included in SB 1383.
Housing, Community Development and Planning
General Area of Revi ew: Housing, Land Use, Development, Annexation, Incorporati on, Building Standards, Mobile Home, and Sign Regulations.
1. Support efforts to establish binding mutual develo pment standards for unincorporated areas , limit county development within a City’s sphere of influence and facilitate logical annexations that support planned growth.
2. Support strong City input on regional land use and planning decisions, ensuring local concerns are prioritized in regional and state planning efforts.
3. Support legislative strate gies that promote efficient , sustainable, and resilient land use, housing, and infrastructure development.
4. Support le gislation that protects land use authority , including decision -making related to water supply, zoning and infrastructure investment.
5. Support a streamlined right-of-way acquisition process.
6. Support land use patterns that maintain safe residential neig hborhoods, enhance economic prosperity, preserve open space, and improve the overall quality of life in Hesperia.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 19 of 27
7. Support legislation that upholds local control over cannabi s cultivation, distribution and retail operations, including enforcement mechanisms for illegal activities.
8. Support legislative programs that promote homeownership affordability, workforce housing initiatives, and financial assistance programs that address the national housing crisis.
9. Support legislation that preserves municipal authority over t he public righ t-of-way including fair and reasonable compensation for use of the right-of-way.
10. Support legislation that facilitates the creation and maintenance of P ayment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) agreements that fund the development of affordable housing projects.
11. Support legislation t o relax eligibility regulations related to affordable housing production requirements.
12. Support state a nd federal legislation that enhance th e viability of pub lic housing authorities (PHAs), including funding mechanisms, and protects the authorities and powers of PHAs.
13. Support state and federal investments in infrastructure (water, roads, public transit) thet complement housing growth and community development.
14. Support legislation t hat preserves local control over h ousing and lan d use decisions while promoting flexible, incentive based approaches to housing development.
15. Oppose legislation that limit s or restricts local government control over land use , growth impac t fees, or planning decisions based on Hesperia’s specific needs.
16. Oppose unfunded state -mandated affordable housing production requirements without corresponding financial support for infrastructure, services and public safety.
17. Oppose measures that remove local authority over housing decisions that best fit the City and its population.
18. Oppose restrictions on local ability to generate funding or establish public -private partnerships for affordable housing and infrastructure projects.
19. Oppose l egislation that in creases administrativ e burdens a nd costs assoc iated with affordable housing without increasing provision of services at the local level.
20. Oppose efforts by any regulato ry commission from promulgating rules and regulations that infringe on local land use decisions and management of the public right-of-way.
21. Oppose legislation that would inappropriately limit local govern ment authority to impose growth impact fees.
22. Oppose legislation similar to SB 375 w hich unfairly ties road and transportation funding to high- density housing mandates that do not align with local planning objectives.
23. Oppose legis lation like SB 9 tha t forces cities to appro ve high-density development on single- family parcels without considering infrastructure, local conditions or community input.
24. Oppose legislation that limit s or removes local authority to manage the right -of-way concerning broadband deployment.
25. Oppose legislation similar to AB 98 that would impose new design and build standards for new o r expanded logistics uses across the state.
Local Control
General Area of Review: Preservation of Local Authority and Decision-Making Powers.
1. Support en hanced local control over public nuisan ces, ( e.g., adult entertainment facilities, problem alcohol establishments, drug paraphernalia establishments, etc.).
2. Support legislation that strengthens local control over gaming issues.
3. Support the cr eation o f mo re affordable, innovative, and quality childcare options while maintaining strict adherence to childcare regulations and guidelines.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 20 of 27
4. Support efforts to increase opportunities for community-wide citizen volunteer programs.
5. Support legislation to fund s ummer youth employment and training programs and expand funding f or year- round youth employment and leadership in order to bet ter prepare youth for future self-sufficiency and prevent youth violence and crime.
6. Support efforts to promote and finance program s to combat pet overpopulation, increase pet adoptions and s pay/neuter programs and educate citizens on the dangers and nuisan ce of roaming, uncontrolled animals and other animal control issues t hat risk public health and safety and quality of life.
7. Support pr ograms and efforts aimed at assisting with the clean -up of abandoned and/or inoperative vehicles.
8. Support for expansion of aviation services at Southern California Logistics Airport (SCLA), provided no quality of life or economic competitiveness issues are impacted in Hesperia.
9. Support legislati on and regulatory efforts that provide people with the social, economic, and physical environments needed to make healthy choices and lead healthy lifestyles.
10. Oppose any legislation that preempts local authority or transfers jurisdiction over local programs.
11. Oppose legislation and the promulgation of rules and regulations that allow any regulatory agency to en croach on or supersede local authority inclu ding, but not limited t o, the City ’s right to franchise for the right to operate in the public right-of-way.
12. Oppose legi slation that supports federal, or s tate iss ued mandates which infringe up on an individual’s freedom of choice regarding medical decisions, such as vaccine mandates.
Public Safety
General Area of Review : Law Enforcement, Fire Safety, Emergency Communica tions, Emergency Services, Disaster Preparedness, and Nuisance Abatement.
1. Support ad equate financing of jails and c riminal justice facilities. Address the ne ed to devote equal time and ene rgy to develop effective alternatives to incarcerat ion, including ea rly intervention of at-risk youth and counseling and rehabilitation programs.
2. Pursue addit ional opportunity for partic ipation in regio nal Restoration of Comp etency (ROC) programs.
3. Support legislation that limits the placement of sex offend er and parolee ho mes within the City limits.
4. Support measures that protect the public against disease and disability and promote health.
5. Support increased authority and reso urces devoted to cities for aba tement of graffiti and other acts of public vandalism.
6. Support legislation that provides local law enforcement agencies authority to recover any costs associated w ith com plying with any federal, state o r court -ordered licensing, registration , and testing requirement.
7. Support legislation that has the potent ial to reduce in cidents of violence in the community, especially through the development of treatment and intervention programs for youth.
8. Support legislation that provides greater protection to victims of crime.
9. Support efforts of the Reducing Crime and Keeping California Safe Act.
10. Support efforts to resolve the medicinal cannabis collective issue throu gh judi cial or legi slative action.
11. Monitor impacts of regulation of medical cannabis and recreational cannabis.
12. Support legislation that continues efforts to maximize opportunity for reimbursement for inmate medical and mental health care , as well as ass isting with continuity of care p ost-release and
2025 Legislative Platform Page 21 of 27
pursuing funding for increased needs resulting from realignment. Mitigate liabilities in areas such as health, mental health, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other areas of legal concern.
13. Support legislation establishing protocols and funding for shared, statewide emergency response communications.
14. Support legislation that protects senior citizens from criminal exploitation.
15. Support legislation that protects society against identity theft.
16. Support legislation that protects juveniles from sexual predators on the internet.
17. Support legislation aimed at reducing gang violence and support enhanced sentences for criminal offenses committed by gang members.
18. Support legislation that provides education for public safety training.
19. Monitor and support le gislation that protects Proposition 36, which addresses homele ssness, addiction, and theft through an alternative approach to prosecution and sentencing.
20. Support legislation that addresses the impacts of long-term jail sentences.
21. Support legislation and funding to provide law enforcement/public safety agencies greater access to wireless communication necessary to support a national wireless broadband network capable of use by any public safety entity to serve and protect communities throughout the nation.
22. Support legislation that promotes p rograms that enhance the benefits of mutual aid agreements between local governments.
23. Support additional funding for local agencies to recoup the costs associated with fire safety in the community.
24. Support legislation that strengthens the City’s ability to prohibit the use and sale of fireworks and that allows the San Bernardino County Fire District to prohibit and otherwise control fireworks.
25. Support legislation that supports the physical and financial ab ility of the San Bernardino County Fire District to actively ban the sale and/or transportation of fireworks.
26. Support legislation that promotes fire safety, education, and prevention with the goal of reducing injury, loss of life, and property damage.
27. Support statewide efforts t o coordinate solutions to th e systemic overcrowding of local Hospital Emergency Rooms and reduce Ambulance overdependence or Ambulance Patient Offload Delays (APOD).
28. Support legislation that provides the San Bernardino County Fire District the authority to recover any costs associate d with com plying w ith any federal, state , or co urt-ordered licensing, registration, and testing requirement.
29. Support measures that encourage disaster preparedness and emergency planning.
30. Support statewide efforts to coordinate disaster preparedness programs in local jurisdictions, and support guidelines to identify the strengths and weaknesses of local preparedness efforts.
31. Oppose programs that have the potential to compromise officer safety.
32. Oppose unfund ed mandate s on local government in relation to trac king of pa roled se xual predators.
33. Oppose any State or local fire related tax or fee increase that does not go back to local agencies.
Revenue and Taxation
General Area of Review : Finance Administration, Taxation Reform, General and Special Revenue, and Revenue Sources at the federal, state, and local levels.
1. Support efforts to protect local government revenue sources and the provisions of Proposition 1a:
The Safe, Reliable High -Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for th e 21st Century and Proposition 22:
Local Taxpayer, Public Safety, and Transportation Protection Act of 2010.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 22 of 27
2. Support le gislation/initiatives that guarantee all local histo rical funding sources shall be a dedicated revenue source for local governments.
3. Support legislation designed to protect, without unnecessarily restricting, the investments of local government agencies.
4. Support local control of the awarding of contracts and the accountability of local officials for those actions.
5. Support le gislation that facilitates and enab les the timel y co llection of delinquent assessments and strengthens or maintains the lien position of those assessments.
6. Support legislation that would require the State to comply with its obligation and original intent of the State Mandated Costs claim process to reim burse cities for costs incurred because of State- mandated programs and processes.
7. Support measures that promote fiscal stab ility, predictability, and financial independ ence at th e local level.
8. Support efforts that p reserve and promote the City ’s ability to maintain and grow its revenue base.
9. Support regional cooperation on common interests and goals by providing access to share incremental growth in ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund) property tax.
10. Support legislation that provides a more balanced mix of property tax revenues related to public service costs among cities, counties, and special districts.
11. Support full cost reimbursement to the City for all federal, state, and county-mandated programs.
12. Support legislation that provides for adequate transparency of the City’s investment activity.
13. Oppose measures that diminish the City ’s revenue sources that are required to maintain critical services.
14. Oppose imposition of state, federal, and regional manda tes upo n local governments, as well as federal mandates on the state, especially those for which no funding exists.
15. Oppose taxes or fees on local refuse programs to fund statewide programs.
16. Oppose legislation that would preempt or threaten local taxation authority.
17. Oppose any change in reve nue allocations that wo uld negatively affect local government, including sales, use and property tax , t ax increment, gas tax (HUTA), tra nsient occupan cy tax (TOT) and vehicle in-lieu fees (VLF).
18. Oppose restrictions on the City’s ability to adopt its own investment policies.
19. Oppose any legislation that would require municipalities to participate in inv estments that do not meet the objectives set forth in the City’s policies.
Transportation, Communication and Public Works
General Area of Review: Transportation, Construction, Telecommunications, and General Public Works Related Areas.
1. Support increased transportation funds allocated to local jurisdictions for discretionary projects.
2. Support legislation to enhance transportation funding equity within the State.
3. Support efforts to encourage flexibility in federal funding and regulations to better meet th e needs of small to medium size communities.
4. Support legislation that facilitates cooperative programs among government agencies in order to help the City meet its basic needs, including transit, street, highway, road and bridge construction and maintenance, and safe corridors for bicyclists and pedestrians.
5. Support new processes to exp edite the permitti ng and environmental r eview a nd ap proval of transportation projects.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 23 of 27
6. Support legislation that requires the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC), Federal PUC and railroad operators to ado pt and fund pr ograms to construct grade separations ne cessary for public safety and welfare.
7. Support legislation that would lift the minimum requirement of payment of prevailing wages on municipal Public Works projects to amounts greater than $500,000.
8. Oppose the reduction/elimination of previously dedicated funds for any transportation project s, especially those that are currently nearing construction and have been delayed by agency actions beyond the City’s control.
9. Oppose transportation proposals that w ould a dversely affect the quality of life in Hesperia by increasing traffic congestion, air pollution, or other problems.
10. Oppose legislation that ties transportation funds to compliance with land use, housing, or cli mate change goals.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 24 of 27
2025 Federal Legislative Policy Statements
The following categories of policy statements are broad and are not intended to be all-inclusive but will be used as a reference tool and guideline for the City’s federal advocacy efforts in 2025.
1. Support funding that specifi cally benefits the City of Hesperia’s transp ortation and public works projects. Support efforts to ensure funding to semi-urban/rural areas, and provide a permanent, direct percentage of unrestricted federal transportation funds to local government transportation departments for priority work in such areas.
2. Support streamlined environmental pro cessing for federal re gulatory permits issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Federal Highway A dministration, and various other state and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure projects.
3. Support efforts to establish regional recognition of the limits of authority by the US Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act.
4. Support direct federal funding from the Economic Development Administration for economic development and public works projects.
5. Support federal leg islation t hat recognizes the importance of sales and use tax to local municipalities and equitably distributes sales tax collections on e-commerce transactions.
6. Support direct federal fun ding t o ci ties, wi thout matching requir ements, to use in drug prevention, intervention, and enforcement efforts.
7. Support efforts to ensure the protection of sufficient radio spectrum to meet public safety’s current a nd future needs . Public safety needs sh ould h ave priority o ver private, or for- profit, communication systems.
8. Support legis lation that enhances and continues the Healthy Forests Initiative which protects public safety and welfare by caring for forest areas and ensuring that losses from wildfire s are minimized.
9. Support efforts to secure a Federal Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) designation for the City.
10. Support local/regional control and administration of federal programs and strategic placement of federal personnel to ensure expedited decision-making.
11. Support responsible and equitable legislation to help stabilize the housing market.
12. Oppose cuts to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. Advocate for a more streamlined application process and for greater flexibility of local a ppropriation and use of monies.
13. Oppose any legislation that mandates a Social Security tax for public employers and employees.
14. Support legislation to modify inappropriate sections of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as it relates to regulating public sector employment.
15. Oppose any changes to the Mortgage Interest Deduction.
16. Oppose any efforts by government sponsored entities (FNMA & Freddie Mac) that will destabilize the housing market including bulk sales of real estate owned properties (REOs).
2025 Legislative Platform Page 25 of 27
Monthly Overview
2025 State Legislative Calendar
Below is an overvi ew that summarizes major legislative ev ents and key dat es that occur month- to-month. The 2025 Legislative Calendar is created by the Office of the Secretary of the Senate.
January
The laws from the prior year take effect on January 1st. The legislative body reconvenes on January 6th to deliberate on forthcoming year's legislation, with all bill requests d ue to the Office of Legis lative Counsel by January 24th.
Additionally, the Governor is required to submit the budget by January 10th.
February
The final day for bill introduction is February 21.
President’s Day is observed February 17.
March
Cesar Chavez day is observed March 31.
April
Spring recess commences upon adjournment on April 10 and resumes on April
21. Legislature reconvenes on April 21 after the Spring recess.
May
May 2 is the deadline for policy committees to review and report on fiscal bills.
Policy committees must review and report non- fiscal bills by May 9. Their last meeting day is May 16 before reconvening on June 9 . May 23 is the final day for fiscal committees to review and report bills to the floor introduced in their house.
Memorial Day is observed on May 26.
June
Floor session only June 2 -6. No committees, other than conference or Rules committees, may meet for any purpose.
June 6 is the deadline f or each h ouse to pass b ills introduced within their house. Committee meetings may resume on June 9.
Budget Bill must be passed by midnight on June 15.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 26 of 27
July
Independence Day is observed July 4
Policy com mittees review and report fiscal b ills by July 18. Summer re cess commences upon adjournment on July 18 , provided Budget Bill has been passed.
August
August 18 Legislature reconvenes from Summer Recess.
August 29 is the deadline for fiscal committees to meet and report bills.
September
Labor Day is observed on September 1
September 2 -12 Floor Se ssion Only. N o committees, other than conference and Rules committees, may meet for any purpose.
September 5 is the final day for floor amendments.
September 12 is the l ast day for house to p ass bills. Interim Study Recess begins at end of day’s session.
October
October 12 is the d eadline for Governor to sign or veto bills passed by the Legislature, on or before September 12 and in the Governor’s possession after September 12.
November No events.
December No events.
2025 Legislative Platform Page 27 of 27
Elected Officials Representing Hesperia
CALIFORNIA STATE GOVERNOR
Name Capitol Address Capitol Numbers
Governor Gavin Newsom 1021 O Street, Suite 9000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-558-3160
CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY
Name Capitol Address Capitol Numbers Local Address Local Numbers Juan Carrillo
39th Assembly District
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249
Phone: 916-319-2039
Fax: 916-319-2139
11600 Air Expressway
Adelanto, CA 92301
Phone: 760-530-0139
Fax: 760-530-0140
Tom Lackey
34th Assembly District
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249
Phone: 916-319-2034
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
Phone: 760-539-1341
CALIFORNIA STATE SENATOR
Name Capitol Address Capitol Numbers Local Address Local Numbers Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
19th Senate District
1021 O Street, Rm 7220
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-651-4019
Fax: 916-651-4919
1758 Orange Tree Lane,
Suite B
Redlands, CA 92374
Phone: 909-335-0271
Fax: 909-335-0282
Senator Suzette Martinez
Valladares
23rd Senate District
1021 O Street, Rm 7140
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-651-4023
Fax: 916-651-4923
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia CA 92345
Phone: 661-286-1471
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR
Name District Address District Numbers
Supervisor Paul Cook
First District
14955 Dale Evans Parkway
Apple Valley, CA 92307
Phone: 909-387-4830
Fax: 909-387-3029
UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Name Washington Address Washington
Numbers
Local Address Local Numbers
Congressman Jay Obernolte
California’s 23rd District
1029 Longworth House
Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-5861 9700 Seventh Ave., #201
Hesperia, CA 92345
Phone: 760-247-1815
UNITED STATES SENATOR
Name Washington Address Washington
Numbers
Local Address Local Numbers
Senator Adam Schiff
112 Hart Senate Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3841
Fax: 202-228-3954
Senator Alex Padilla 331 Hart Senate Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3553
Fax: 202-224-2200
255 E Temple Street
Suite 1860
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: 310-231-4494
Fax: 202-224-0357