Hesperia City Council
April 15, 2025

Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Meeting Agenda
Closed Session - 4:30 PM
Regular Meeting - 6:30 PM

HESPERIA CITY COUNCIL

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

HOUSING AUTHORITY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

WATER DISTRICT
City Council Chambers
9700 Seventh Ave., Hesperia CA, 92345
City Clerk's Office: (760) 947-1007
City Council Members
Allison Lee, Mayor
Cameron Gregg, Mayor Pro Tem
Brigit Bennington, Council Member
Chris Ochoa, Council Member
Josh Pullen, Council Member
Rachel Molina, City Manager
Pam K. Lee, City Attorney
NOTE: In compliance with the Americans with Disability Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (760) 947-1007 or (760) 947-1026. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.

To leave a Public Comment by phone, call and leave a recorded message at (760) 947-1026 up to 5:30 pm on the day of the scheduled meeting. City Council meetings may be viewed live or after the event on the City’s website at www.cityofhesperia.us.

April 15, 2025City Council Meeting Agenda

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

HESPERIA CITY COUNCIL

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY

HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT
9700 7th Avenue, Council Chambers, Hesperia, CA 92345
As a courtesy, please silence your cell phones and other electronic devices while the meeting is in session. Thank you.

Prior to action of the Council, any member of the audience will have the opportunity to address the legislative body on any item listed on the agenda, including those on the Consent Calendar.

Individuals wishing to speak during General Public Comments or on a particular numbered item must submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk with the agenda item noted. Speaker slips should be turned in prior to the public comment portion of the agenda or before an agenda item is discussed. Comments will be limited to three minutes for General Public Comments, Consent Calendar items and New Business items. Comments are limited to five minutes for Public Hearing items.

In compliance with the Brown Act, the City Council may not discuss or take action on non-agenda items or engage in question and answer sessions with the public. The City Council may ask brief questions for clarification; provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information and direct staff to add an item to a subsequent meeting.

CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 PM
Roll Call
Mayor Allison Lee
Mayor Pro Tem Cameron Gregg
Council Member Brigit Bennington
Council Member Chris Ochoa
Council Member Josh Pullen
Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation:

Government Code Section 54956.9(d)2

1. Two (2) Cases
Personnel Matters - Performance Evaluations
Government Code Section 54957

1. Performance Evaluation - City Attorney

2. Performance Evaluation - City Manager
CALL TO ORDER - 6:30 PM
A. Invocation
B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

April 15, 2025City Council Meeting Agenda
C. Roll Call
Mayor Allison Lee
Mayor Pro Tem Cameron Gregg
Council Member Brigit Bennington
Council Member Chris Ochoa
Council Member Josh Pullen
D. Agenda Revisions and Announcements by City Clerk
E. Closed Session Reports by City Attorney

ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS

1. Presentation of Proclamation to The San Bernardino County Children’s Network declaring April as Child Abuse Prevention Month. 2 . City Hall Employee of the Quarter to Yvonne Kliewer, Administrative Secretary by Nathan Freeman, Director of Development Services.

3. Recognition of former City Council Advisory Committee members by the City Council.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS (For items and matters not listed on the agenda) Individuals wishing to speak during General Public Comments or on a particular numbered item are requested to submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk with the agenda item noted. Speaker slips should be turned in prior to the public comment portion of the joint agenda or before an agenda item is discussed. Comments will be limited to three minutes for General Public Comments, Consent Calendar items and New Business items. Comments are limited to five minutes for Public Hearing items.

In compliance with the Brown Act, the City Council may not discuss or take action on non-agenda items or engage in question and answer sessions with the public. The City Council may ask brief questions for clarification; provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information and direct staff to add an item to a subsequent meeting.

JOINT CONSENT CALENDAR

1. Consideration of the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesday, April 1, 2025.

Recommended Action:

It
is recommended that the City Council approve the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesday, April 1, 2025.

Staff Person: Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Melinda Sayre Draft CC Min 2025-04-01Attachments:

2. Warrant Run Report (City- Successor Agency- Housing Authority- Community Development Commission- Water)

April 15, 2025City Council Meeting Agenda
Recommended Action:

It is
recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.

Staff Person: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
SR Warrant Run 4-15-2025
Attachment 1 - Warrant Run
Attachments:

3. Treasurer’s Cash Report for the unaudited period ended February 28, 2025 Recommended Action:

It is
recommended that the Council/Board accept the Treasurer’s Cash Report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.

Staff Person: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
SR Treasurer's Report 4-15-2025
Attachment 1-Treasurer's Report
Attachments:

4. Leasing Program for Wireless Communication Facilities on City- and Water Fund-Owned Property
Recommended Action:

It is
recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of Hesperia Water District approve the proposed Leasing Program for Wireless Communication Facilities on City- and Water District-owned property.

Staff Person: Director of Development Services Nathan Freeman SR Wireless Communication Facilities 4-15-2025
Attachment 1 - Leasing Program
Attachment 2 - Standard Lease Agreement
Attachment 3 - Existing Leases List
Attachments:

5. Award Professional Service Agreements for Engineering and Public Works Plan Check Services
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water Districtapprove the award of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to three (3) professional consultants to provide On-Call Engineering and Public Works Plan Check Services for an initial term of three (3) years and each contract in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for each consultant as follows:

Plan Check Consultant Firm

April 15, 2025City Council Meeting Agenda
Transtech Engineers, Inc. $200,000
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
$200,000
WestLAND Group, Inc. $200,000
Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR On-Call Plan Check Services 4-15-2025
Attachment 1 - Consultant Fee Schedules
Attachments:

6. Consideration of the US-395 Utility Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District approve a utility agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for the reimbursement associated with the relocation of a portion of waterline within the City of Hesperia on US-395 Highway.

Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR US-395 Utility Agreement Approval 4-15-2025
Attachment 1 - SBCTA Utility Agreement
Attachments:

7. Purchase of Audio / Video System for Interview and Observation Rooms Recommended Action:

It is
recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of a new Genetec Audio / Video system to replace the video recording system in the two interview rooms and two observation rooms at the Hesperia Police Department.

Staff Person: Captain Steve Allen
SR Audio and Video System for Interview & Observation Rooms 4-15-2025Attachments:

PUBLIC HEARING
Individuals wishing to comment on public hearing items must submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk with the numbered agenda item noted. Speaker slips should be turned in prior to an agenda item being taken up.

Comments will be limited to five minutes for Public Hearing items.

WAIVE READING OF ORDINANCES
Approve the reading by title of all ordinances and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

8. Public Hearing and Adoption of the Community Development Block Grant 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the 2025-2026 Action Plan Recommended Action:

It is
recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and, upon accepting public testimony:

April 15, 2025City Council Meeting Agenda

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-09, approving a) the City’s Five Year 2025-2029 Consolidated
Plan; and b) the 2025-2026 Action Plan, including any
modifications or amendments as directed by the City Council;

2. Authorize staff to modify the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025-2026 Action Plan based on City Council’s direction; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute and transmit all necessary documents, ensuring the City’s timely receipt of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding
Staff Person: Director of Development Services Nathan Freeman and Economic Development Supervisor Eydee Jimenez
SR CDBG Consolidated Plan & Action Plan 4-15-2025
Resolution 2025-09
Attachment 2 - Application Notebooks
Attachment 3 - Exhibit A Staff Recommendations
Attachment 4 - Exhibit B Application Summary Matrix
Attachment 5 - Draft Consolidated Plan & Action Plan
Attachments:

9. Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022, 2023-2024, and 2024-2025 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plans
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2025-010, including any necessary modifications, following public testimony;

2. Approve a substantial amendment to the 2021-2022, 2023-2024, and 2024- 2025 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plans by reallocating a total of $1,063,171 from unprogrammed prior-year (2019- 2024) CDBG funds to the Program Year (PY) 2023 and PY 2024 Street Improvement projects; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute and transmit all necessary documents, including the substantial amendment to the annual Action Plans and any additional amendments, to ensure the timely expenditure of CDBG funds.

Staff Person: Director of Development Services Nathan Freeman and Economic Development Supervisor Eydee Jimenez
SR Substantial Amendment to Annual Action Plans 4-15-2025 Resolution 2025-010
Attachment 2 - Draft Substantial Amendment Action Plans Attachments:

NEW BUSINESS

10. Consideration of the plans for the Animal Shelter Play Yard Recommended Action:

April 15, 2025City Council Meeting Agenda
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file a presentation on the upcoming Animal Shelter Play Yard.

Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR Animal Shelter Play Yard 4-15-2025Attachments:

11. Amend the Professional Services Agreements for On-Call Engineering Services
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council and Board of the Hesperia Water District
1) Approve an amendment to each of the three existing contracts to provide on-call engineering services in the amount of $300,000 each, for a revised not-to-exceed contract amount of $650,000 each
2) Approve a two-year contract extension and
3) Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the amendment to the Agreement and any other necessary documents related thereto.

Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR On-Call Engineering Services 4-15-2025
Attachment 1 - SR On-Call Engineering Services 6-7-2022 Attachment 2 - On-Call Engineering Fee Schedules
Attachments:

12. Amend the Professional Services Agreements for On-Call Engineering Design Services for Roadway Projects Funded by the CDBG Program Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Approve an amendment to each of the three existing on-call contracts for On-Call Engineering Services for roadway improvement projects funded by the City’s annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) in the amount of $350,000 each, for a revised not-to-exceed contract amount of $700,000 each; 2) Approve a two-year contract extension; and
3) Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the amendment to the Agreement and any other necessary documents related thereto.

Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR On-Call Engineering Services for CDBG 4-15-2025
Attachment 1 - SR CDBG On-Call Engineering Services 8-2-2022 Attachment 2 - CDBG On-Call Engineering Fee Schedules
Attachments:

13. Consideration of the In-House Striping Program and the Purchase of Striping Equipment
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve the implementation of an in-house roadway striping program;

April 15, 2025City Council Meeting Agenda

2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Victorville Chevrolet for the purchase of one (1) 2024 Chevrolet 3500 flatbed truck in an amount not to exceed $65,000; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Dispensing Technology Corporation for the purchase of one (1) Graco RoadLazer RoadPak Striping System in an amount not to exceed $89,985.

Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR In-House Striping Program 4-15-2025
Attachment 1 - Graco Roadlazer Roadpack information & quote Attachment 2 - Bid Comparison
Attachments:

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COMMENTS
The Council may report on their activities as appointed representatives of the City on various Boards and Committees and/or may make comments of general interest or report on their activities as a representative of the City.

CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY/STAFF REPORTS
The City Manager, City Attorney or staff may make announcements or reports concerning items of interest to the Council and the public.

ADJOURNMENT
I, Melinda Sayre, City Clerk of the City of Hesperia, California do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda on Thursday April 10, 2025 at 5:30 p.m. pursuant to California Government Code §54954.2. _____________________________
Melinda Sayre,
City Clerk
Documents produced by the City and distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting regarding items on the agenda will be made available in the City Clerk's Office during normal business hours.

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

City of Hesperia
City of Hesperia
Meeting Minutes – Draft
City Council
Tuesday, April 1, 2025 6:30 PM

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

HESPERIA CITY COUNCIL

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY

HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT

HESPERIA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT - SPECIAL MEETING
CLOSED SESSION - 5:15 PM
Roll Call

Present: 5 - Mayor Lee, Mayor Pro Tem Gregg, Council Member Bennington, Council Member Ochoa and Counci
l Member Pullen
Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation: Government Code Section 54956.9(d)2

1. Two (2) Cases
CALL TO ORDER - 6:34 PM
A. Invocation
B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
C. Roll Call

Present: 5 - Mayor Lee, Mayor Pro Tem Gregg, Council Member Bennington, Council Member Ochoa and Counci
l Member Pullen
D. A genda Revisions and Announcements by City Clerk – None E.

Closed Session Reports by City Attorney- No reportable action taken City Council Chambers
9700 Seventh Ave.

Hesperia CA, 92345

City of Hesperia
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS (For items and matters not listed on the agenda) The following people commented:

Gina Whelan
Mike Cole
Staci Kovach
Bill Jensen

JOINT CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Bennington, seconded by Ochoa that the Joint Consent Calendar minus items 4 and 8 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 5 - Gregg, Bennington, Lee, Ochoa, and Pullen
Nay: 0

1. Consideration of the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesday, March 18, 2025.

Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesda
y, March 18, 2025.

Sponsors: Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Melinda Sayre

2. Warrant Run Report (City - Successor Agency - Housing Authority - Community Development Comm
ission - Water)
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hes
peria Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.

Sponsors: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher

3. Audited Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council, Community Development Commission, Hesperia Housing Authorit
y Board, Hesperia Water District Board, and Hesperia Fire Protection District Board receive and file the audited Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024.

Sponsors: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher

4. Professional Services Agreement with NBS Government Finance Group for Community Facilities District Advisor
y and Administration Services
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement
with NBS Government Finance Group (NBS) in an amount not-to-exceed $52,500 for FY 2025-26 Community Facilities District administration services and fiscal advisory services related to the formation of the 2025 Silverwood CFD through the Bond Opportunities for Land Development (BOLD) program.

Sponsors: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher

City of Hesperia
A motion was made by Gregg, seconded by Ochoa, that this item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 5 - Lee, Gregg, Bennington, Ochoa and Pullen
Nay: 0

5. Three-Year Maintenance and Licensing Agreement with HLP Inc.

Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a three-year maintenance and
licensing contract with HLP Inc. for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $112,492 to provide maintenance and licensing for the HLP Chameleon (Chameleon) software system.

Sponsors: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher

6. Risk Financing Study Contract Amendment
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve an amendment of $1,410 to
the existing contract with Risk-Albert Holdco LLC., DBA: Albert Risk Management Consultants (Albert Risk), for a revised not-to-exceed contract amount of $63,410.

Sponsors: Deputy Human Resources/Risk Management Director Rita Perez

7. Designation of Director and Alternate Director to the Public Entity Risk Management Authority Board of Directors
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-07 authorizing the City Manager to designate
the Director and the Alternate Director to serve and represent the City of Hesperia on the Public Entity Risk Management Authority (PERMA) Board.

Sponsors: Deputy Human Resources/Risk Management Director Rita Perez

8. Final Tract Map No. 18955-3
Recommended Action:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-08 approving Final Map No. 18955-3 to
create 122 residential lots on approximately 50.72 gross acres and accept right-of-way necessary to develop Tract 18989-2 Lot 3, Planning Area 2 of the Tapestry Specific Plan (Applicant: Silverwood Development Phase I, LLC).

Sponsors: Administrative Analyst Dena Alcayaga
A motion was made by Bennington, seconded by Gregg, that this item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: 5 - Lee, Gregg, Bennington, Ochoa and Pullen
Nay: 0

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COMMENTS
The Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members reported on various events and Committees.

Council Member Bennington and Pullen reported they have CCAC vacancies and are reviewing CCAC applications.

City of Hesperia
Mayor Pro Tem Gregg requested a discussion item on firework fines and the 84-unit Apartment Complex project on Smoke Tree St.

Mayor Lee requested the traffic study for the 84-unit Apartment complex project on Smoke Tree St. and the acronym list for all Council Members.

CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY/STAFF REPORTS
No comments

ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned in honor of Council Member Benington’s sons 28th birthday at 7:27p.m. _____________________________
Jessica Giber,
Deputy City Clerk

City of Hesperia

STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council Members
City Council, as Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency
Chair and Commissioners, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Commissioners, Community Development Commission Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District

FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Casey Brooksher, Assistant City Manager
Anne Duke, Deputy Finance Director
Verenise Fierros, Accountant

SUBJECT: Warrant Run Report (City – Successor Agency – Housing Authority – Community Development Commission – Water)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.

BACKGROUND

The Warrant Run totals represented below are for th e period March 8 , 2025 through March 21, 2025.

The wire amount total is as follows:

 $12,500.00 to Entitlement Strategies Group Inc. for correction of APN 3039 -441-23 and APN 3039-441-24.

CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM

Financial Health – Maintain a balanced budget and adequate reserves.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Warrant Runs
Agency/District Accounts Payable Payroll Wires Totals
City of Hesperia $3,915,296.41 $384,856.12 $12,500.00 $4,312,652.53 Successor Agency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Housing Authority 365.93 156.32 0.00 522.25
Community Development Commission 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 1,649,042.83 161,709.58 0.00 1,810,752.41
Totals $5,564,705.17 $546,722.02 $12,500.00 $6,123,927.19

YEAR-TO PRIOR FY YTD

W/E W/E WARRANT DATE DATE
FUND # FUND NAME 3/14/2025 3/21/2025 TOTALS Wires TOTALS * TOTALS Accounts Payable
100 GENERAL 1,137,246.02 $ 1,937,633.09 $ 3,074,879.11 $ - $ 28,430,410.26$ 26,820,504.06$ 105 PENSION OBLIGATION TRUST -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
106 OPEB TRUST -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
110 SILVERWOOD 14,693.00$ 3,562.50$ 18,255.50$ -$ 80,843.48$ -$ 200 HESPERIA FIRE DISTRICT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
204 MEASURE I - RENEWAL 2,921.43$ -$ 2,921.43$ -$ 37,231.76$ 509,371.09$ 207 LOCAL TRANSPORT-SB 325 -$ -$ -$ -$ 1.64$ 967,882.81$ 209 GAS TAX-RMRA -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
210 HFPD (PERS) -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,755,819.00$ 907,316.00$ 241 CFD 2021-1 Resid Maint. & Serv -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,280.00$ -$ 242 CFD 2022-1 Non-Resd Maint & Serv -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,280.00$ -$ 243 CFD 2023-1 Silverwood Maint -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,280.00$ -$ 251 CDBG -$ 5,943.25$ 5,943.25$ -$ 2,909,005.65$ 340,836.91$ 254
AB2766 - TRANSIT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
255 AB3229 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
256 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS GRANT 7,179.37$ -$ 7,179.37$ -$ 36,803.37$ 21,631.25$ 262 SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT -$ -$ -$ -$ 104,497.49$ -$ 263 STREETS MAINTENANCE 41,821.08$ 173,506.73$ 215,327.81$ -$ 2,111,375.77$ 1,627,156.15$ 300 DEV. IMPACT FEES - STREET -$ 9,077.00$ 9,077.00$ 12,500.00$ 171,147.82$ 82,056.38$ 301 DEV. IMPACT FEES - STORM DRAIN -$ -$ -$ -$ 129,647.43$ -$ 306 DEV. IMPACT FEES - 2018-STREETS -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,230,619.55$ 1,640,006.95$ 307 DIF 2018-DRAINAGE FACILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$ 168,099.30$ -$ 309 DIF 2018-CITY HALL FACILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 312 DIF 2018-POLICE FACILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
313 DIF A-04 DRAINAGE -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,154,638.51$ 320,448.35$ 402 WATER RIGHTS ACQUISITION -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,666,463.80$ 1,220,101.69$ 403 2013 REFUNDING LEASE REV BONDS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 571,151.39$ 404 2023 REFUNDING LEASE REV BONDS -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500.00$ -$ 504
CITY WIDE STREETS - CIP -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,785,354.47$ 10,218,149.68$ 509 CITY FACILITIES CIP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
800 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 529,720.94$ -$ 529,720.94$ -$ 7,110,757.86$ 6,439,266.66$ 801 TRUST/AGENCY 2,131.00$ 49,861.00$ 51,992.00$ -$ 1,297,002.69$ 1,635,659.94$ 802 AD 91-1 AGENCY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
804 TRUST-INTEREST BEARING -$ -$ -$ -$ 42,379.11$ 267,035.60$ 807 CFD 2005-1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,186,302.97$ 1,266,529.66$ 808 HFPD (TRANSITION) -$ -$ -$ -$ 317,435.02$ 347,796.19$ 815 PLAN REVIEW TRUST - FRONTIER -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ CITY 1,735,712.84$ 2,179,583.57$ 3,915,296.41$ 12,500.00$ 52,732,176.95$ 55,202,900.76$ 163 REDEVELOP OBLIG RETIREMENT-2018 -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,690,950.62$ 9,949,902.79$ SUCCESSOR AGENCY -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,690,950.62$ 9,949,902.79$ 370 HOUSING AUTHORITY -$ 365.93$ 365.93$ -$ 43,090.03$ 35,950.25$ HOUSING AUTHORITY -$ 365.93$ 365.93$ -$ 43,090.03$ 35,950.25$ 170
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700 WATER OPERATING 200,077.68$ 244,545.17$ 444,622.85$ -$ 11,075,388.42$ 7,945,407.23$ 705 WATER PENSION OBLIGATION TRUST 500,000.00$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 1,250,000.00$ -$ 706 WATER OPEB TRUST 250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ -$ 701 WATER CAPITAL -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,473.00$ 320,389.00$ 710 SEWER OPERATING 5,916.86$ 65,378.01$ 71,294.87$ -$ 4,656,004.68$ 4,623,568.83$ 711 SEWER CAPITAL 331.80$ 381,727.84$ 382,059.64$ -$ 1,999,242.79$ 1,249,376.35$ 720 RECLAIMED WATER OPERATIONS 247.78$ 817.69$ 1,065.47$ -$ 277,364.29$ 272,949.04$ WATER 956,574.12$ 692,468.71$ 1,649,042.83$ -$ 19,524,473.18$ 14,411,690.45$ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TOTAL 2,692,286.96$ 2,872,418.21$ 5,564,705.17$ 12,500.00$ 81,990,690.78$ 79,600,444.25$ REG. PAYROLL
City 384,856.12$ -$ 384,856.12$ -$ 6,135,489.13$ 5,749,302.76$ Housing Authority 156.32$ -$ 156.32$ -$ 4,822.97$ 3,684.45$ Water 161,709.58$ -$ 161,709.58$ -$ 2,843,296.31$
2,443,978.07$
PAYROLL TOTAL 546,722.02$ -$ 546,722.02$ -$ 8,983,608.41$ 8,196,965.28$ City of Hesperia

WARRANT RUNS
3/8/2025-3/21/2025
Attachment 1

City of Hesperia

STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council Members
City Council, Serving as Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency
Chair and Commissioners, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Commissioners, Community Development Commission Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District

FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager

BY: Casey Brooksher, Assistant City Manager
Anne Duke, Deputy Finance Director
Jonathan Settle Accountant

SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Cash Report for the unaudited period ended February 28, 2025.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the Council/Board accept the Treasurer’s Cash Report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.

BACKGROUND

This report is presented to the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 53646 (b ) setting forth the City’s investment portfolio.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

The Treasurer’s Cash Reports are presented on the following pages for each agency.

CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM

Financial Health – Maintain a balanced budget and adequate reserves.

FISCAL IMPACT

These reports reflect unaudited cash balances as of February 28, 2025.

ALTERNATIVE(S)

Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. City of Hesperia Investment Report

2. Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency Investment Report

Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members Treasurer’s Cash Report
April 15, 2025

3. Hesperia Housing Authority Investment Report

4. Community Development Commission Investment Report

5. Hesperia Water District Investment Report

FUND VALUE
General Fund (100 & 800) 29,026,468.83
Pension Obligation Trust (105) 81,506.27
OPEB Trust (106) -
Silverwood 11,326.67
HFPD (PERS) (210) 1,545,970.55
CFD 2021-1 Resid Maint & Serv 2,177.05
CFD 2022-1 Non-Resid Maint & Serv 2,177.05
CFD 2023-1 Silverwood Maint 2,546.95
AB27666 - Transit (254) 25,903.66
AB3229 Supplemental Law (255) 481,366.08
AD No. 91-1 (802) 403,637.14
Beverage Recycling Grant (256) 303,291.82
CFD 2005-1 (807) 1,971,096.39
HFPD Transition (808) -
City Wide-Capital Projects (504) (10,443,830.44)
Community Dev Block Grant (251, 252, & 253) 783,338.09
American Rescue Plan Grant (261) 25,299,848.23
SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant (262) 250,437.00
Development Impact Fund (300-304) 5,144,508.33
Development Impact Fund 2018 (306-312) 27,056,946.79
Development Impact Fund A-04 Drainage (313) 590,604.52
Disaster (260) 62,742.64
Gas Tax Fund (205) 2,368,876.83
Gas Tax - RMRA (209) 9,515,119.47
Gas Tax Swap (206) 1,806,198.58
Local Transportation SB325 (207) 1,647,307.71
Measure I - Renewal (204) 13,603,239.30
Public Works Street Maint (263) 1,005,859.40
Public Art (230) 264,531.83
Trust Fund (801, 803-806, & 815) 1,244,364.56
2012 Water Rights Acquisition (402) 678,791.13
2023 Refunding Lease Rev Bonds (404) 1,642,150.56
TOTAL CITY FUNDS 116,378,502.99$

CITY OF HESPERIA

Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members Treasurer’s Cash Report
April 15, 2025

FUND VALUE
RORF Retention - (163) 1,560,946.55$

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

FUND VALUE

Hesperia Housing Authority Fund (370) 4,366,595.22$
VVEDA Housing Authority (371) 1,986,592.85
TOTAL HOUSING AUTHORITY FUNDS 6,353,188.07$

HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY

FUND VALUE

Community Development Commission Fund (170) 3,589,556.34$

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members Treasurer’s Cash Report
April 15, 2025

VALUE
Water Operating (700) 16,210,019.74$
Water Capital (701) 5,543,493.27
Water Capital Rehab and Replace (703) 4,396,878.28
Water Contamination Mitigation (704) 2,715,703.31
Water Pension Obilgation Trust (705) 511,128.58
Water OPEB Trust (706) 250,000.00
Sewer Operating (710) 12,539,809.21
Sewer Capital (711) 1,842,305.48
Sewer Capital Rehab and Replace (713) 837,769.39
Reclaimed Water Operations (720) 169,457.50
TOTAL WATER FUNDS 45,016,564.76$
WATER
FUND

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

City of Hesperia

STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 15, 2025

TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Nathan R. Freman, Director of Development Services
Eydee Jimenez, Economic Development Supervisor

SUBJECT: Leasing Program for Wireless Communication Facilities on City- and Water Fund- Owned Property

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of Hesperia Water District approve the proposed Leasing Program for Wireless Communication Facilities on City- and Water District- owned property.

BACKGROUND

To streamline and standardize the leasing process for wireless communication facilities on City and Water District-owned property, staff has developed the attached Leasing Program. This program includes a Standard Lease Agreement to ensure consistent and transparent guidelines for all future leases.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

The proposed Leasing Program outlines key lease parameters, including minimum and maximum rental rates, lease durations, and other essential terms. Leases that meet these parameters will not require City Council review or approval, expediting the process. The program will also provide clear guidance for the Development Services Director and Economic Development Supervisor during lease negotiations.

General lease terms include:

 Lease Term and Renewals: Initial lease terms will be a minimum of five (5) years, with up to two five-year renewal options.
 Rental Rates and Increases: Monthly rents will range from $2,000 to $3,500 based on location. All leases will include a fixed 5% annual escalator.  Maintenance: Facility owners will be responsible for maintaining and securing all equipment, per industry standards.
 Subleases: All subleases must be reviewed and approved by the City. The City will retain 50% of revenue generated from subleases.

The Planning Division will oversee design reviews, permit processing, and compliance, while the Economic Development Division will handle lease negotiations and administration.

Currently, the Economic Development Division manages seven (7) wireless communication

Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Leasing Program for Wireles Facilities on City- and Water Fund-Owned Property

facilities on City and Water Fund -owned properties. Six of t hese are located on Water District properties, generating revenue for the Water Fund; the remaining site contributes to the General Fund. These facilities support local telecommunications infrastructure, improve connectivity, and provide recurring revenue for the City and the Water Fund. The Economic Development Division monitors lease compliance, tracks industry trends, and negotiates terms to optimize both financial and operational outcomes.

A list of existing leases is included as an attachment.

CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM

Future Development - Facilitate balanced growth to ensure cohesive community development and pursue economic development.

FISCAL IMPACT

The Water Fund currently receives approximately $220,897.92 annually from existing leases, while the General Fund receives about $25,334.04. These funds support ongoing City and Water services and infrastructure investments.

ALTERNATIVE(S)

Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Leasing Program

2. Standard Lease Agreement

3. Existing Leases List

LEASING PROGRAM FOR

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES ON CITY-OWNED PROPERTY

PURPOSE

This Leasing Program establishes clear guidelines for leasing City -owned property for wireless communication facilities. Leases that comply with these guidelines do not require City Council approval, streamlining the process.

KEY OBJECTIVES

The Leasing Program aims to optimize revenue, enhance efficiency, and ensure consistency. To maximize revenue, market-based lease rates will be set with fixed annual increases. Efficiency will be improved by streamlining leasing and compliance processes, creating a smoother operation. Consistency will be maintained by implementing a Standard Lease Agreement across all sites, ensuring uniform leasing terms.

LEASE TERMS

The lease terms include a five -year initial term, with the option for up to two additional five-year renewals. Base rent ranges from $2,000 to $ 3,500 per month, depending on location, with a fixed annual increase of 5%. All subleases must be approved by the City, which will retain 50% of the sublease revenue. A surety bond of $100,000 is required, and the Lessee must indemnify the City, holding it harmless from any liability.

PROCESS AND OVERSIGHT

The Planning division is responsible for reviewing wireless communication facilities designs, zoning compliance, and permit approvals. The Economic Development division is responsible for lease negotiations and lease management to ensure alignment with program objectives. City Council approval is only required if lease terms fall outside the established parameters of the Leasing Program.

COMPLIANCE AND MAINTENANCE

Lessees are required to maintain their sites and complete any necessary repairs within five business days. Failure to comply may result in penalties or lease suspension.

Additionally, lessees must carry specific insurance coverage, including $2 million in general liability insurance with a $4 million aggregate, $1 million in automobile liability insurance, and $1 million in workers' compensation coverage.

ACCESS

The City reserves the right to inspect leased facilities for emergency or maintenance purposes. Non -emergency maintenance inspections require at least 24 hours’ prior notice.

Attachment 1

01071.0005/1043741.1

WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY LEASE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF HESPERIA
AND
___________

This WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY LEASE AGREEMENT (“ Lease Agreement” or “ Agreement”) entered into as of this ____ day of __________, 20_____ is between CITY OF HESPERIA/OR HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT , a California municipal corporation (“Lessor”), and _________(“Lessee”) (collectively, “Parties”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Lessor is t he owner of that certain real property located in the County of San Bernardino, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (“Lessor’s Property”); and
WHEREAS, Lessee desires to lease a portion of Lessor's Property, as described in Exhibit B, in connection with its federally licensed communications business together with a right of ingress and egress and a right to install its wireless communications facilities, including wireless antenna or antenna array (collectively, “ Communications Facility,” “Equipment” or “Facility”) on Lessor’s Property; and
WHEREAS, subject to the following terms and conditions, Lessee and Lessor desire to enter into this Lease Agreement , which shall supersede all other agreements , whether oral or written , between Lessee and Lessor concerning the herein subject Lessor’s Property , Premises, and Communication Facility, and
WHEREAS, Lessee and Lessor hereby enter into this Lease Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein, and the Parties expressly agree that this is not an easement.

NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the promises and of the mutual obligations and agreements in this Lease Agreement, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

1. LESSOR’S PROPERTY
Lessor is the record owner of that certain parcel of real property located in the State of California, County of San Bernardino , City of Hesperia, commonly known as ________________, also known as Assessor’s Parcel No. __________, (the “Lessor’s Property”). The legal description of the Lessor’s Property is contained in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated in this Lease.

2. THE PREMISES

2.1 Description
Lessor hereby leases to Lessee and Lessee leases from Lessor that portion of the Lessor’s Property generally described as follows: approximately ________ square feet of ground space in which Lessee, upon obtaining all necessary permits, shall install its Communications Facility . The Attachment 2

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 2
location of the Premises, the legal description of ingress and egress pathways to the Premises, and other portions of the Premises shall be as shown in Exhibit B and the map that is contained in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The Premises include and permit the following:
(a) An equipment building of approximately ____ square feet in size as described in Exhibit B (“Equipment Building”).
(b) A new ______ tower (the “Tower”).
(c) A ____ foot wide nonexclusive strip of land area for the purpose of installing and maintaining all necessary underground cables and utilities from the Equipment Building to the Tower (“Sub-Grade Cable Run Area”).

2.2 Plans Specifications
Exhibit C shall provide full plans and specifications of the equipment, tower, photo simulations, and landscaping plans (the “Site Plan”). Specifications shall include the location of the end-of- path site and azimuth. Specifications of any rooftop equipment shall include roof weight loading and how cables will be attached to ground-level facilities. The tower, antennas , and site installations shall be built exactly per such plans unless Lessor agrees to changes before they are implemented. Lessor shall have final design approval.

Prior to construction, Lessee shall deliver to Lessor true and complete sets of submissions and correspondence to and from the local zoning authority and other government entities , including the California Public Utilities Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal Aviation Authority.

2.3 Communications Facility Property; Equipment
All portions of the Communications Facility brought onto the Premises by Lessee will be and shall remain Lessee’s personal property with the exception of Lessee-installed property for the benefit of Lessor, such as Lessee-installed light poles or ot her structures used for antenna mounting that replace Lessor’s original poles or structures. Such exceptions are and shall be the property of the Lessor and shall not be removed without the approval of the Lessor. Following completion of the Equipment Building and written approval and acceptance thereof by Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, ownership of the Lessor’s portion of the Equipment Building as indicated on Exhibit B shall automatically transfer to Lessor. Each party shall be responsible for the cost of maintenance and repairs to their respective portions of the Equipment Building.

Prior to installing or allowing any Equipment to be installed in or on the Premises, Lessee shall submit detailed engineering plans and specifications of the planned installation to Lessor for Lessor’s written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably delayed. Lessor’s review of Lessee’s plan shall include a review of the appearance of the Equipment. The Equi pment to be installed must be in compliance with all federal, state, and local laws, including but not limited to local zoning and design requirements, and must adhere to all technical standards set forth in this Lease Agreement. Lessor’s approval of any installation is not a representation that such installation of the Equipment is in compliance with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, rules and

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 3
regulations or that such Equipment will not cause interference with other systems, if any, then in operation on the Premises. Lessee hereby confirms and agrees that its Equipment shall be installed and operated solely within the Premises.

Lessee understands and acknowledges that it shall at no time install or modify any wireless Communications Facilities or wireless antennas unless it first obtains the necessary approvals and permits in accordance with the Lessor’s local laws or any other applica ble state and federal ordinances and regulations. Lessee further acknowledges that all facilities to be maintained within the Premises, whether currently included in the exhibits attached hereto or to be modified or built in the future, require all necessary approvals and permits mentioned herein.

2.4 Access.

Access to the site is subject to the notice requirements in Section 15.

2.5 Setbacks.

Any setback of the Premises from the Lessor’s Property boundaries and the width of any access road shall be the width required by the applicable governmental authorities, includi ng police and fire departments.

2.6 Parking
No parking is permitted in the lease area except as specified herein: Lessee and its employees, representatives, and contractors may park their vehicles on Lessor's Property only when necessary to carry personnel, Equipment, or supplies, or for the purpose of necessary construction, repairs, operation or maintenance on the Premises as allowed under this Lease Agreement.

3. LEASE AND IRREVOCABLE NON-EXCLUSIVE INGRESS AND EGRESS Lessor hereby leases the Premises to Lessee to access, install, operate, maintain , and remove Lessee's Communications Facility in and on the Premises and grants to Lessee an irrevocable, non- exclusive area during the term of this Lease Agreement for reasonable ingress and egress from a public right of way immediately abutting Lessor’s Property to and from the Premises, (collectively, “Ingress and Egress Area”) seven (7) days a week, twenty -four (24) hours per day for the sole purpose of installing, operating and maintaining the Communications Facility including conduits and pipes over, under and along the Ingress and Egress Area as more fully described in Exhibit B and Exhibit C. Lessee shall conduct no activities other than those set forth in this Lease Agreement without the prior written consent of Lessor.

4. TERM, RENT, AND SECURITY DEPOSIT

4.1 Term
This Lease Agreement shall not be valid unless and until signed by the City Manager (“ Effective Date”). No right in or to the Premises shall vest in Lessee until the occurrence of the Effective Date.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 4
This Lease Agreement shall be for an initial term of five (5) years (“Initial Term”), commence upon full execution of this agreement (“Commencement Date”). The Lease Agreement shall be terminated in accordance with the provisions governing termination as set forth in Section 8 herein.

Lessee shall have the option to renew for an additional two (2) terms of five (5) years each (each a “Renewal Term”), for a total term of twenty-five (25) years if all Renewal Terms are granted .

Renewal shall be automatic unless Lessor or Lessee terminates lease in accordance with the provisions governing termination as set forth in Section 8 herein. No renewal shall be permitted if Lessee is in default of this Lease Agreement on the last day preceding such Initial or Renewal Term.

Provided all Renewal Terms to this Lease Agreement are exercised by the Parties, and unless the Parties terminate this Lease Agreement prior to the Termination Date as set forth in Section 8, this Lease Agreement shall terminate on _______ (“Termination Date”) without any further notice to Lessee. Lessee shall vacate the Premises, in accordance with the terms of this Lease Agreement no later than sixty (60) days from the Termination Date.

At the end of the lease term, with the express consent of the Lessor, the Parties may continue the lease of the Leased Property on a temporary m onth-to-month basis (“ Temporary Holdover Period”) on the same conditions and terms of this License Agreement except that the Monthly Rent shall be in the amount of 150% of the Monthly Rent in effect at the expiration of this Lease Agreement. Said Temporary Holdover Period shall not exceed 180 days from the date of the end of the lease term. Lessee shall notify Lessor in writing of its request to continue the lease on a month-to-month basis one hundred eighty (180) days in advance of the Termination Date. Nothing contained herein shall grant Lessee the right to holdover after the term of this Lease Agreement has expired.

4.2 Rent
This Lease Agreement shall commence on the aforementioned Commencement Date at the initial rental rate of _____________ (“Monthly Rent”). The Monthly Rent shall be payable to Lessor on the first day of each month, in advance without offset or deduction, and shall be non -refundable.

The first month of rent shall be pro -rated from the Commencement Date to the end of the month at a rate of _____________ per day.

Lessee's failure to pay Monthly Rent by the fifteenth (15th) day of each month shall subject Lessee to a late charge in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) per annum of the overdue amount or the maximum allowable by law, whichever is greater until all amounts owing to Lessor are paid in full. Said late charge shall be automatically imposed without notice. Acceptance of such late charge by Lessor shall in no event constitute a waiver of Lessee's default with respect to such overdue amount, nor prevent Lessor from exercising any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder or by law.

The Monthly Rate shall increase annually during the Initial Term and any Renewal Term, effective as of each anniversary of the Commencement Date, by an amount equal to five (5%), per annum above the amount of the Monthly Rate in effect immediately prior to such increase.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 5
All Monthly Rent payments shall be sent to the Lessor’s address in Section 15.

4.3 Surety Bond
Upon execution of this Lease, the Lessee shall deposit with the Lessor a security deposit in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ( $100,000) in the form of a corporate surety bond (“Surety Bond”) acceptable to the Lessor to secure the Lessee’s faithful performance of all terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease. Lessee agrees that Lessor may (but shall not be required to) apply the Surety Bond in whole or in part to remedy any damage to the Premises caused by Lessee, its Agents or Invitees, or any failure of Lessee to perform any other terms, covenants of conditions contained herein (including, but not limited to, the payment of Rent or other sums due hereunder either before or after a default), without waiving any of Lessor’s other rights and remedies hereunder or at law or in equity and without any obligation. Lessee waives the provisions of Section 1950.7 of the California Civil Code or any similar law, statute , or ordinance now or hereafter in effect and agrees that Lessor may retain any portion of Security Deposit reasonably necessary to compensate Lessor for any other foreseeable or unforeseeable loss or damage caused by the acts or omissions of Lessee, its Agents or Invitees.

5. PERMITTED USE OF THE PREMISES
The Premises may be used only for (i) the transmission and reception of communication signals within or utilizing the frequency bands duly licensed by the Federal Communications Commission; (ii) the construction, maintenance, repair, and replacement of its Equipment inc luding antennas, cables and facilities, and improvements related thereto; and (iii) activities related to the foregoing, provided that none of the activities described (i), (ii), or (iii) require any physical expansion or relocation of any portion of the Premises or violate Lessee’s duties of non -interference set forth herein (collectively, “Lessee’s Permitted Use”) as described in the project plans and specifications in Exhibit C attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.

5.1 Colocation
Lessee may divide, sublease, sublicense, apportion or otherwise piggyback or colocate additional wireless telecommunication operators on the Facility (each such event individually constituting a “Colocation”), provided, however, that prior to any colocation, Lessee shall obtain the prior written consent of Lessor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, and Lessee shall obtain any approvals or permits required by the City of Hesperia. Additionally, Lessee shall deliver to Lessor within 30 days of each colocation, a fully executed copy of the agreemen t evidencing such colocation.

5.2 Additional Rent for Colocation
Lessee shall pay to Lessor, as Additional Rent, 50% of the monthly rent Lessee receives from each such wireless telecommunications operator for a Colocation.

5.3 Access
At all times throughout the term of this Lease Agreement, and at no additional charge to Lessee, Lessee and its employees, agents, and subcontractors will have twenty -four (24) hour per day,

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 6
seven (7) days per week right of access to and over Lessor’s Property, along Lessor’s specified access routes, for the installation, maintenance and operation of the Communications Facility and any utilities serving the Premises, subject to the following requirements:
 Lessee shall provide notice to Lessor as required by Section 15.  Lessee shall provide a minimum of two (2) weeks written notice to Lessor prior to the planned initial installation of equipment.
 Lessee shall provide forty-eight (48) hours advance notice to Lessor prior to bringing any vehicles or equipment onsite. Vehicular access shall be denied if the vehicle or Equipment:
(1) has a gross vehicle weight in excess of 10,000 pounds; (2) has skid steering, including track-driven vehicles or Equipment; (3) possesses outriggers or stabilizers; (4) needs to be transported by trailer; or (5) is not recognized by the Department of Motor Vehicles to be legally driven or operated across/over public roads or highways.  Lessee shall provide twenty-four hours (24) advance telephone notice to Lessor prior to any routine, non-emergency, maintenance of the equipment to be undertaken by Lessee, its employees, agents, servants, contractors or subcontractors, or any of the ir employees, agents or servants.
 In the case of an emergency, Lessee shall be required to provide as much notice as is reasonably practicable in the situation.

6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
Lessee will: (i) keep, maintain and repair the Premises in good condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and (ii) repair any damage caused by Lessee to Lessor’s Property including but not limited to accessways to the Premises. Lessee’s maintenance obligation in the preceding sentence shall include, but no t be limited to, the replacement of any lights that may be mounted upon the Facility.

Lessee shall repair any damage the Premises or the Lessor’s Property caused by Lessee during construction, maintenance and operations, or any time said damage is caused b y Lessee. Lessee shall repair the Premises or Lessor’s Property to substantially the same condition in which they existed upon the start of construction within five (5) business days from the date of Lessee’s receipt of Lessor’s written notice to repair such damage. Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for all of Lessor’s direct and indirect costs associated with such repair, including labor and material costs (the “Total Repair Costs”)incurred by the Lessor to repair such damage if necessitated by Lessee’s failure to make such repair. Should damages be deemed severe in Lessor’s sole determination, Lessor reserves the right to require more immediate timeliness of Lessee’s response or to repair without Lessee’s consent and at Lessee’s expense.

A late fee of twenty percent (20%) of the Total Repair Costs shall be assessed for each business day the repair is not completed according to mutually agreed upon deadlines.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 7

7. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS, RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS
Lessee’s use of the Premises and its Communications Facility on the Premises shall comply with all applicable Governmental Requirements of federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to the non-interference and radio frequency emissions rules of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Fe deral Aviation Administration ( FAA). “Governmental Requirements” shall mean all applicable requirements under any federal, state or local statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, or other requirements of any duly constituted public authority having jurisdiction over the Premises. Lessee shall indemnify Lessor and hold it harmless from all expenses, costs, damages, losses, claims or other expenses and liabilities arising from Lessee’s failure to comply with Government Requireme nts, except to the extent such expenses, costs, damages, losses, claims or other expenses and liabilities arise from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor. Lessee shall monitor and certify such compliance in accordance with requirements as may be established by Lessor.

Lessee’s ability to use the Premises shall be dependent upon Lessee obtaining currently valid certificates, permits, and other approvals, which may be required from any federal, state, or local authorities. Lessor shall reason ably cooperate with Lessee, but at no expense to Lessor, in obtaining such approvals.

Lessee shall be accountable for RF safety by submitting annual test results to confirm compliance with the FCC’s RF emission guidelines. Such testing should be sufficiently detailed to ensure that employees in the vicinity of the wireless antenna will not be har med. Lessee shall also provide warning signs on the antenna and an automatic shutdown if workers are near the antenna.

Lessee is responsible for compliance with all tower marking and lighting requirements of the FAA and the FCC. Lessee shall indemnify and hold harmless Lessor from any fines or other liabilities caused by Lessee’s failure to comply with such requirements.

8. TERMINATION
Either Lessor or Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease Agreement after the Initial Term of Five (5) years for a ny cause by providing the other party with sixty (60) days written notice.

Lessee shall at its own cost and expense remove its personal property and fixtures, foundations and underground conduits and utilities, from the Premises and shall restore the Premises to good order and condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted on or before the 60th day after the receipt of the notice of termination by Lessor or the issuance of the notice of termination by Lessee and/or sixty (60) days prior to the Terminatio n Date, whichever occurs first, at which time Lessee shall peacefully quit and surrender the Premises and accessways. If Lessee fails to remove such Equipment within sixty (60) days after expiration or earlier termination of this Lease Agreement, Lessee at Lessee’s sole option may: (i) remove and dispose of the Equipment and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for the reasonable costs actually incurred of such removal and restoration of the Premises; or (ii) Lessor may deem the Equipment abandoned, whereupon the Equipment shall become Lessor’s property, and Lessor shall have all rights to the Equipment, including without limitation the right to use, reuse, sell, lease, or dispose of same.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 8
In the event that Lessee abandons the Premises for a continuous period of sixty (60) days or more, Lessor may, at its sole discretion, proceed to remove Lessee’s Equipment and bill Lessee for same, and this Lease Agreement shall automatically terminate after Lessor gives thirty (30) days’ written notice to Lessee. In such case, Lessor shall impose and Lessee shall pay such back Monthly Rental and incurred costs as required by this Lease Agreement.

This Lease Agreement may further be terminated by Lessor or Lessee if either party remains in default under Section 14 of this Lease Agreement after the applicable cure period has lapsed.

9. PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES
Lessee shall pay all taxes and rental fees levied, assessed, or imposed by reason of Lessee's use of the Premises, including but not limited to possessory interes t tax pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 107.6, regardless of to whom taxes and/or fees are addressed . Lessee agrees to pay, before delinquency, all such taxes levied. Lessee shall be liable for failure to pay any possessory property taxes. Lessee shall also pay before delinquency, all taxes assessed against personal property of Lessee which may be located in or upon the Premises.

10. LIENS
During the term hereof, Lessee shall keep the Premises free from all liens, including but not limited to mechanic's liens and further encumbrances by reason of the use of the Premises by Lessee.

Failure of Lessee to remove any potential or recorded lien against the Premises within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice of recordation shall be considered an Event of Default of this Lease Agreement and cause for termination under Section 14 herein.

11. UTILITIES
Lessee shall be directly responsible to pay all charges for all utili ties required by Lessee's use of the Premises including but not limited to gas, electricity, water and telephone. Lessee shall make all arrangements with utility providers and government authorities for all utilities and other like services to the Premises during the term of this Lease Agreement.

12. INDEMNIFICATION

12.1 Indemnification; Definitions
To the maximum extent permitted by law, including but not limited to California Civil Code Section 2778, Lessee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Lessor, its of ficers, agents, representatives, and employees (individually and collectively “ Lessor Indemnitee”) from and against a “ Liability” [as defined in Sub paragraph (a) below] or an “ Expense” [as defined in Subparagraph (b) below], or both that arise out of pertain to, or relate to an act, error, or omission of Lessee, its employees, agents, contractors , and persons whom Lessee employs or hires (individually and collectively “Lessee Indemnitor”):

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 9
(a) “Liability” means claims, suits, actions, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, decrees, awards, settlements, liens, losses, damages, injuries, or liability of any kind, whether the liability is:
(1) Actual or alleged;
(2) In contract or in tort; or
(3) For bodily injury (including accidental death), personal injury, advertising injury, or property damage.
(b) “Expense” means fees, costs, sums, penalties, fines, charges, or expenses of any kind, including, but not limited to:
(1) Attorney’s fees;
(2) Costs of an investigation, litigat ion, arbitration, mediation, administrative or regulatory proceeding, or appeal;
(3) Fees of an accountant, expert witness, consultant, or other professional; or
(4) Pre or post-judgment interest or settlement interest.

12.2 Obligations
Under this Section 12, Lessee Indemnitor’s defense and indemnification obligations:
(a) Apply to a Liability, or an Expense, or both, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the actual or alleged passive negligence of a Lessor Indemnitee; but (b) Do not apply to a Liability, or an Expense, or both, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of a Lessor Indemnitee.

12.3 Defense
To the extent that Lessee Indemnitor’s insurance policy provides an upfront defense to Lessor Indemnitee, Lessee Indemnitor’s obligation to defend a Lessor Indemnitee under this Section 12:
(a) Means that Lessee shall provide and pay for legal counsel satisfactory to Lessor Indemnitee;
(b) Arises when a claim, suit, complaint, pleading, or action against a Lessor Indemnitee arises out of, pertains to, relates to, or asserts an act, error, or omission of Lessee Indemnitor; and
(c) Arises regardless of whether a claim, suit, complaint, pleading, or action specifically names or identifies Lessee Indemnitor.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 10
Section 12.3 does not limit or extinguish Lessee Indemnitor’s obligation to reimburse a Lessor Indemnitee for the costs of defending the Lessor Indemnitee against a Liability, or an Expense, or both. Lessor Indemnitee’s right to recover defense costs and attorney’s fees under this Section 12 does not require, and is not contingent upon, Lessor Indemnitee’s first:
(a) Requesting that Lessee Indemnitor provide a defense to the Lessor Indemnitee; or (b) Obtaining Lessee Indemnitor’s consent to the Lessor Indemnitee’s tender of defense.

If Lessee Indemnitor contracts all or any portion of its work under this Lease Agreement, Lessee Indemnitor shall require that each contractor indemnify, defend and hold harmless Lessor Indemnitee under the terms in this Section 12.

Lessee Indemnitor’s obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Lessor Indemnitee will remain in effect and will be binding upon Lessee Indemnitor whether the Liability, or the Expense, or both, accrues — or is discovered — before or after this Lease Agreem ent’s expiration, cancellation, or termination.

12.4 Application of Section
Except for Section 12.3, this Article’s indemnification and defense provisions are separate and independent from the insurance provisions in Section 13. In addition, the indemnification and defense provisions in this Article:
(a) Are neither limited to nor capped at the coverage amounts specified under the insurance provisions in Section 13; and
(b) Do not limit, in any way, the applicability, scope, or obligations of the insurance provisions in Section 13.

13. INSURANCE
In order to accomplish the indemnification of Lessee provided for in this Lease Agreement, but without limiting the indemnification, Lessee shall secure and maintain through the term of this Lease Agreement the following types of insurance with limits as shown in this Lease Agreement.

Lessee shall obtain, pay for, and maintain during the life of this Lease Agreement a Commercial General Liab ility policy, including Contractual Liability, and an Automobile Liability policy which shall protect it and Lessor from claims for injuries and damages. The Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall include the Lessor, its offic ers, agents, and employees as additional insureds under the policy in the following amounts:
 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and Four Million Dollars ($ 4,000,000) general aggregate and Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) completed operations aggregate; and  Automobile liability insurance covering all owned , non-owned, and hired vehicles with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 11
for personal injuries, including accidental death, to any one person and for property damage.
 The coverage amounts set forth above may be met by a combination of underlying and umbrella policies so long as, in combination, the limits equal or exceed those stated and that all excess policies shall cover Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees as additional insureds and said policies are primary coverage.  Workers’ Compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employers Liability insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.  Property Insurance against all risks of loss to any Lessee improvements or betterments, at full replacement cost with no coinsurance penalty provision.

Said policies shall contain a "Severability of Interest" clause and a "Primary Coverage" clause for any loss arising from or caused by Lessee's exercise of this Lease. Said policies shall contain a statement of obligation on the carrier's part to notify th e Lessor by U.S. Mail at least thirty (30) days in advance of any policy cancellation. Lessee shall provide Lessor with at least thirty (30) days advance notice in the event of any policy termination or reduction in the amount of coverage.

Lessee shall require the carriers of the above-required coverages to waive all rights of subrogation against Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees. Said policies shall be issued by companies authorized to do business in California and having not less than Best's A -VII rating or approved by Lessor in its business judgment, and shall be issued in the name of Lessee.

Before execution of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall furnish Lessor with a "Certificate of Insurance" and an "Additional Insured Endorsement and Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement and Workers Compensation.” Said documents shall include policy language evidencing the additional insured status of Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees. Said documents shall be countersigned by the insurance carrier or its authorized representative on forms satisfactory to the Lessor’s City Attorney, which set forth the above provisions. The countersigned certificate, along with the additional insured endorsement, shall include the Lessor, its officers, agents, and employe es as additional insureds under the Commercial General Liability policy, Subrogation Endorsement, and Worker's Compensation. Said insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to the coverage of the Lessor, and neither the Lessor nor any of its insurers shall be required to contribute to any loss.

This policy contains a severability of interest clause.” Lessee shall maintain all required insurance in force at all times during the Term of this Agreement.

Failure to maintain said insurance due to expiration, cancellation, or reduction in coverage shall be cause for the Lessor to give notice to immediately terminate this Lease Agreement. Failure to reinstate said insurance within ten (10) days of said notice shall constitute a material breach and shall be cause for the immediate termination and forfeiture of this Lease Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall have the right to self -insure with respect to the insurance coverage with the approval of the City. The required proof of such self-insurance shall be in a form satisfactory by the Lessor’s City Attorney.

No less than ten (10) days prior to the annual anniversary date of said insurance policy coverage,

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 12
Lessee shall deliver to Lessor a renewal certificate of insurance and renewal additional insured endorsement Commercial General Liability policy, Subrogation Endorsement, and Workers Compensation in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney and in conformance with the requirements set forth herein.

Lessor reserves the right to modify its insurance requirements pursuant to this Lease Agreement on a tri-annual basis unless circumstances arise that require earlier consideration of said insurance requirements.

14. DEFAULT AND RIGHT TO CURE
The occurrence of any one or more of the following events shall constitute an "Event of Default" hereunder in whole or part by Lessee.
 The failure by Lessee to make the payment of Monthly Rent or any other payment required to be made by Lessee hereunder when due, where such failure shall continue for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof is received by Lessee from Lessor.  Lessee’s failure to maintain insurance coverage as required in Section 13.  The failure by Lessee to observe or perform any other provision contained in this Lease Agreement, where such failure shall continue for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice thereof is received by Lessee from Lessor; provided, however, that it shall not be deemed an Event of Default by Lessee if Lessee shall commence to cure such failure within said thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes such cure to completion.

Upon an Event of Default caused in whole or part by Lessee which is not cured or commenced to be cured by Lessee, Lessor in addition to any and all other remedies available to Lessor at law or in equity shall be entitled to one or more of the following remedies: (i) terminate this Lease Agreement; (ii) obtain immediate restraint by inju nction; or (iii) prior to a determination and authorization by a court of competent jurisdiction, to re -enter the Premises and remove persons and personal property therefrom.

15. NOTICES
All notices hereunder must be in writing and given by first class certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier U.S. Postal mailbox or any U.S.

Post Office, postage prepaid, to be effective when properly sent and received, refused or returned undelivered. Should the Lessor or Lessee have a change of address or a change in the designated individual with knowledge of this Lease Agreement, the other party shall immediately be notified in writing of such change, provided, however, that each address for notice must include a street address and not merely a post office box. All notices, demands, or requests from Lessee to Lessor shall be given to Lessor addressed as follows:

Lessor: City of Hesperia
9700 Seventh Ave.

Hesperia, CA 92345

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 13
Attn: Economic Development
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 760-947-1909

With copy to: Pam K. Lee, City Attorney
1 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 9214
[email protected]
949-223-1170

Lessee: NAME
Address
Attn:

Email:

Phone:

With copy to: NAME
Address
Attn:

Email:

Phone:

16. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store, or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about, or within the Premises in violation of any federal, state, or loc al law or regulation. Lessor represents, warrants and agrees that neither Lessor nor, to Lessor's knowledge, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within Premises in violation of any law or regulation.

Lessee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Lessor against any and all losses, liabilities, claims, and costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs) arising from any breach of any representation, warranty or agreement contained in this paragraph. “Hazardous Material” shall mean any hazardous or radioactive material, polychlorinated biphenyls, friable asbestos or other hazardous or medical waste substances as defined by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended or by any other federal, state or local law, statute, rule, regulation or order concerning environmental matters, or any matter which would trigger any employee or community “right -to-know; requirements adopted by any such body, or for which any such body has adopted any requirements for the preparation or distribution of a material safety data sheet. This paragraph shall survive the termination of this Lease Agreement.

17. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Lessor warrants and agrees that Lessee, upon paying the Monthly Rent and performing the covenants herein provided, shall peaceably and quietly have and enjoy the Premises. Lessor shall not cause or permit any use of the Premises which interferes with or impairs the quality of the

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 14
communications services being rendered by Lessee from the Leased Premises.

Subject to the terms of this Lease Agreement, Lessor reserves for itself, its successors and assigns the right to use the Premises, or any portion thereof for any purposes that Lessor may find necessary. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee's use of the Premises includes proprietary trade secrets. Accordingly, Lessor, except in cases of emergency, shall have no right to enter the Lessee Portion of the Equipment Building without Lessee's prior consent and accompaniment which shall not be unreasonably withheld.

18. NON-INTERFERENCE
Lessee shall operate its communications and related existing ground Equipment as described in Exhibit C on the Premises in a manner that will not cause harmful interference with the use or enjoyment of the Premises by Lessor and other Lessees or licensees (“Existing Lessees”) in and/or on the Premises. Lessee shall be responsible for all costs associated with any tests dee med necessary to resolve any and all interference.

Lessee's activities on the Premises shall not interfere with Lessor's radio communication operations including but not limited to interference with Lessor's radio frequencies, effective radiated power and physical location. Such interference shall be deemed a material breach by Lessee subject to Section 14 herein, and Lessee shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate said interference.

If interference caused by Lessee’s failure to comply with FCC or FAA rules and regulations has not been corrected within the required period specified by the FCC or FAA after Lessee receives notice thereof, Lessor may require Lessee to remove from its facilities the specific items causing such interference.

Lessor shall not interfere nor shall Lessor allow any use of the Premises conferred after the Effective Date to interfere in any way with the communications operations of Lessee as described in this Lease Agreement. Such interference with Lessee's communications op erations shall be deemed a material breach by Lessor, and Lessor shall have the responsibility to promptly terminate said interference.

Lessor shall not alter its existing or contemplated use of the Premises, nor shall Lessor permit any Lessees, licensees, employees, invitees or agents obtaining rights to the Premises from and after the Commencement Date to use any portion of the Premises in any way which unreasonably interferes with the operations of Lessee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Lessor hereby acknowledges that in the event of any unreasonable interference with Lessee’s Permitted Use as a result of the transmission or reception (or both) of radio, microwave or other telecommunications signals by a future Lessee, licensee, or occupant of the Premises, Lessee’s rights hereunder to conduct Lessee’s Permitted Use shall be and remain superior to the rights of any such future Lessee, licensee or occupant, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 18 herein.

Lessor reserves the right to license or lease other portions of the Premises to other parties during the Term of this Lease Agreement and any month-to-month tenancy thereafter. Accordingly, Lessor agrees that any other person or entity who may install Equipment subse quent to the Commencement in and/or on the Premises, including, without litigation, existing Lessees or

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 15
licensees, will be permitted to install only such communications Equipment that is of a type and frequency that does not cause harmful interference to Lessee or any persons or entities collocated on Lessee’s facilities. In the event any such person or entity’s Equipment causes such interference, Lessor will cause the interfering party to take all steps necessary to correct and eliminate the interference or such interfering party will be required to cease operations until such interference is removed. To the extent that Lessee’s operations are not within the parameters of its FCC license, this protection from collocated interference will not be applicable, but it shall be applicable with respect to those operations, or portions thereof, falling within the FCC license parameters.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee’s right to be free from interference and Lessor’s duties concerning the prevention and/or correction of interference shall be subject to Section 18 herein.

In the event that Lessee commences to use the Premises in a manner as to which Lessee is not presently licensed by the FCC but, Lessee’s right to conduct such particular use shall be subordinate to the use of the Premises by Lessor and other Lessees or licensees thereof existing on or before the date on which the Lessee subsequently obtains the necessary FCC licensure. Lessor shall be under no obligation to exercise the duties concerning interference described in Section 18 with respect to a future use of the Premises by Lessee as described in this Section 18.

19. SECURITY
Lessee acknowledges that while Lessor makes every effort to protect and secure all property within the park, it does not guarantee the security of the Premises. Lessee shall be responsible to maintain its own security measures as it pertains to Lessee’s use of the Premises.

20. CONDEMNATION
In the event Lessor or any other publi c or private entity that has condemnation authority under state law initiates condemnation proceedings affecting the Premises, Lessor or other said entity will provide at least forty-eight (48) hours’ notice of the proceeding to Lessee. If Lessor or other said entity takes all of the Premises, or a portion sufficient, in Lessee’s sole determination, to render the Premises unsuitable for Lessee, this Lease Agreement will terminate as of the date the title vests in the Lessor or other said authority . Lessee will be entitled to reimbursement for any prepaid Monthly Rent on a prorated basis and no severance fee shall apply.

21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

21.1 Waiver
Lessor's failure to exercise any of its rights resulting from a default or breach of covenant on the part of Lessee shall not be construed as a waiver thereof, nor shall any custom or practice which may grow up between the Parties in the course of administering this Lease Agreement be construed to waive or to lessen the right of Lessor to insist upon the performance by Lessee of any term, covenant or condition hereof, or to exercise any right given it resulting from any such default. A waiver of a particular breach or default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the same or any other subsequent breach or default.

21.2 Time Essence

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 16
Time is of the essence of this Lease Agreement and of each provision.

21.3 No Partnership
This Lease Agreement shall not be construed to continue any form of partnership or joint venture between Lessor and Lessee.

21.4 Construction
Section titles or captions contained in this Lease Agreement are inserted as a matter of convenience and for reference and in no way define, limit, extend or describe the scope of this Lease Agreement or any provision hereof.

Unless defined otherwise, the words used in this Lease Agreement shall be construed according to their plain meaning in the English language. The language used in this Lease Agreement shall not be interpreted strictly for or against either party.

If any provision of this Lease Agreement is capable of two constructions, one of which would render the provision valid and the other of which would render the provision invalid, then the provision shall have the meaning that renders it valid.

The singular includes the plural and vice -versa and t he masculine includes the feminine and neuter, whenever the context so requires.

21.5 Warranty
Lessor warrants and agrees that Lessor is seized of good and sufficient title to and interest in the Premises, and has full authority to enter into and execute this Lease Agreement, and that there are no undisclosed liens, judgments or impediments of title of record or not of record on the Premises that would affect this Lease Agreement. Lessor makes no representation or warranty whatsoever concerning the suitability of the Premises for the purposes intended by Lessee. Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Lease Agreement, Lessee further acknowledges that neither Lessor, nor any of Lessor's officers, agents, and employees have made nor is Lessee entering into this Lease Agreement in reliance upon any such representations.

21.6 Governing Law
This Lease Agreement and the performance hereon shall be governed, interpreted, construed, and regulated by the laws of the State of California.

21.7 Entire Lease Agreement
This Lease Agreement constitutes the entire Lease Agreement between the Parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof, fully supersedes any and all prior understandings, representations, warranties and agreements between the Parties hereto, or any of t hem pertaining to the subject matter hereof, and may be modified only by written agreement signed by all of the Parties hereto.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 17

21.8 Binding Power
Each person executing this Lease Agreement warrants and represents that he or she is duly authorized to execute this Lease Agreement on behalf of Lessor or Lessee.

21.9 Assignment & Subleases
Lessee shall not assign this Lease Agreement or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interest in this Lease Agreement without the prior written consent of Lessor, which consent shall not be unreasonably denied, withheld, or delayed. Lessee may assign all or any of its interests in this Lease Agreement without such consent to Lessee’s Affiliate or to any entity that acquires all or substantially all of the Lessee’s assets in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Premises is located by reason of a merger, acquisition, or other business reorganization. Upon notification to Lessor of such assignment, transfer, or sale, Le ssee will be relieved of all future performance, liabilities, and obligations under this Agreement. All insurance policies and other documents bearing Lessee’s name that must be provided by Lessee to Lessor must be reissued and filed anew with Lessor not later than thirty (30) days before any such transfer is final and completed.

Lessee may not otherwise assign or sublease this Lease Agreement without Lessor’s consent, which consent may be delayed in Lessor’s sole discretion, except in connection with an assignment as collateral to secure a loan from a bona fide third -party lender obtaining such assignment as a part of a larger collateral pool. Any assignment consented to by Lessor in its sole discretion shall not operate to release the assigning Lessee from its liabilities or obligations arising hereunder. The City shall retain 50% of all sublease revenue.

21.10 Severability
If any portion of this Lease Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then such portion sh all be deemed modified to the extent necessary in such court's option to render such portion enforceable and, so modified, such portion and the balance of this Lease Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

21.11 Attorneys' Fees
In case suit shall be brought because of the breach or alleged breach of any covenant herein contained on the part of any party to be kept or performed, or for declaratory relief, the prevailing party or Parties shall recover from the non -prevailing party or Parties all costs a nd expenses incurred therein, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in enforcing any judgment.

21.12 Section 7901
Notwithstanding this Lease Agreement or any provision contained herein, the Parties agree and acknowledge that Lessee preserves all rights and benefits under Section 7901 of the California Public Utilities Code, and nothing herein shall be deemed to have waived such rights.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 18

21.13 Force Majeure
For the purposes of this Lease Agreement, “ Force Majeure ” means an unforeseen event or condition deemed by Lessor as calling for immediate action to avoid the threat of loss or injury of property and/or danger to public safety—including, but not limited to, an act of God, labor dispute, civil unrest, epidemic, and/or natural disaster.

01071.0005/1043741.1 Page 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have executed this Lease Agreement as of the date and year first written above.

LESSOR
City of Hesperia, a municipal corporation

Rachel Molina, City Manager

ATTEST

Melinda Sayre, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Aleshire & Wynder, LLP

Pam K. Lee, City Attorney

LESSEE
Name

Name:

Title:

Name:

Title:

SCHEDULE OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit A (the Lessor’s Property)
Exhibit B (the Premises)
Exhibit C (the Site Plan)

LESSOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)

COUNTY OF )

On ________________________________ before me, ________________________________, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ar e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person (s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature __________________________________

Name _____________________________________
(typed or printed) (Seal)

LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
COUNTY OF __________________ )

On ________________________________ before me, ________________________________, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________, who proved to me on the basis of sati sfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature __________________________________

Name _____________________________________
(typed or printed) (Seal)

EXHIBT A

Lessor’s Property
Number of pages: ______ (__)

EXHIBIT B

Premises
Number of pages: _______ (___)

EXHIBIT C

Site Plan

Number of pages:________ (______)

Lessor Lessee Location Current
Rent/Mo. Annual Rent Lease
Expiration
Water Fund SBA Steel 1 7499 3rd Avenue $ 2,754.51 $ 33,054.12 9/30/2027 Water Fund ATT – 1 18720 Main Street $ 2,737.58 $ 32,850.96 2/28/2031 Water Fund ATT – 2 12950 Sultana Street $ 2,438.93 $ 41,267.16 12/31/2024 Water Fund Verizon 2 11020 10th Avenue $ 2,975.14 $ 35,701.68 4/30/2031 Water Fund SBA Steel 2 18712 Main Street $ 3,251.00 $ 39,012.00 6/30/2029 Water Fund Verizon 1 7034 Maple Street $ 3,250.99 $ 39,012.00 6/30/2029 $ 18,408.16 $ 220,897.92
General Fund Phoenix 11011 Santa Fe Street $ 2,111.17 $ 25,334.04 11/30/2024 Grand Total: $ 246,231.96
Subtotal:

Wireless Communication Facilities Leases List

City of Hesperia

STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council Members
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District

FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Cassandra Sanchez, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Enrique Villalobos, Associate Engineer

SUBJECT: Award Professional Service Agreements for Engineering and Public Works Plan Check Services

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District approve the award of a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to three (3) professional consultants to provide On-Call Engineering and Public Works Plan Check Services for an initial term of three (3) years and each contract in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for each consultant as follows:

Plan Check Consultant Firm
Transtech Engineers, Inc. $200,000
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. $200,000 WestLAND Group, Inc. $200,000

BACKGROUND

The Public Works Engineering Division (Engineering) provides various engineering and project services in support of residential and non-residential projects. These services include the review of construction drawings to assure compliance with City, State, and Federal regulations. The Consultants will provide plan check services for items such as, but not limited to, street, sewer, water, grading and storm drain projects, as well as provide Conditions of Approv al, when necessary.

Consultants on the pre-approved on-call list may be used by the City. In using the pre-approved consultants, the City will reduce contract administration time and costs to procure professional services for plan check services allowing Engineering to continue to provide in-house and public services as the need arises. In using pre-approved consultants from the on-call list, staff will be able to procure services timelier, thereby providing continued service to developers, Public Works, other City Departments, and/or capital projects.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

On February 16, 2025, Engineering released a Request for Proposal (RFP) ENG-2025-02 to solicit proposals for on -call engineering and public works plan check services. A total of nine proposals for plan check services were received in response to the RFP . Each proposal was

Staff Report to the Mayor and Council/Board Members
Award Professional Services Agreements for Engineering and Public Works Plan Check Services April 15, 2025

reviewed by a n internal selection committee and evaluated based on the understanding of the RFP, approach to scope of work, and experience and qualifications. Proposals were received from the following consultants:

Plan Check Services
Consultant Location
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. Redlands, CA Valued Engineering, Inc. Upland, CA
Borrelli and Associates, Inc. Fresno, CA
Onward Engineering Anaheim, CA
WestLAND Group, Inc. Hesperia, CA
HR Green Pacific, Inc. Corona, CA
Labib Funk + Associates El Segundo, CA
TKE Engineering, Inc. Riverside, CA
Transtech Engineers, Inc. Chino, CA

Staff recommends agreements in the not-to-exceed amounts of $200,000 for plan check services for the three (3) highest average score s for the initial three -year period. Awarding the three contracts will not require the City or District to use the entire contract amount, actual expenditures will be based on services provided as they occur.

Under these agreements the City will create a PO for less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) on an as-needed basis that will be drawn down as the consult ants are used. How quickly this is used will fluctuate depending on the demand of development, the needs of the City and the availability of the consultant to perform work. The on-call plan check services will mainly be used by staff to supplement services for Developer-led land development purposes, in which case the Developer will pay for the costs of the services required through plan check fees. And three firms are selected to avoid a conflict if the Developer is utilizing one of the chosen consultants for design work.

Consultants were made aware; a pproval of the recommended action does not guarantee issuance of contracts and/or task orders. On -call contracts allow Staff the flexibility to mobilize professional services quickly and easily under pre -negotiated terms and conditions. On-call professional service contracts are common practice in areas like engineering, construction, and consulting and can be found in local, regional, and sta te government agencies such as San Bernardino County and California Department of Transportation.

CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM

Public Safety - Ensure public safety resources adequately protect our community.

Future Development - Facilitate balanced growth to ensure cohesive community development and pursue economic development.

Capital Improvement - Continually evaluate capital improvement priorities.

FISCAL IMPACT

Costs associated with the recomme nded contracts, which shall not exceed $ 200,000 for engineering and public works plan check services per contract over the three-year contract term, will be funded through available revenue sources, operating budgets, and/or capital budgets as well as be offset by the Developer paying the City’s plan check fees.

Staff Report to the Mayor and Council/Board Members
Award Professional Services Agreements for Engineering and Public Works Plan Check Services April 15, 2025

As these are engineering and public works plan check professional service contracts, the specific tasks or projects have not yet been determined or assigned. Adequate appropriation for the costs of the services is included in the City’s Adopted Budget and will be included in future recommended budgets through the end of each contract term.

ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. Do not award the PSAs and direct staff to utilize the RFP process to solicit survey and traffic professional services for each individual activity or project. Individual solicitations will require additional cost and time for solicitation and contract administration as well as a delay of services to internal City departments and the public.

2. Provide alternate direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Consultant Fee Schedules

Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc.
1861 W . Redlands Blvd. | Redlands, CA 92333

FEE PROPOSAL
Engineering & Public Works
Plan Check Services
Submitted: March 12, 2025
Attachment - 01

Local Office:
1861 W. Redlands Blvd.

Redlands, CA 92373
(909) 890-1255, [email protected]
Evaluation Period Contact:

Craig Brudin, QSP
(909) 890-1255 x102
[email protected]
1861 W . Redlands Blvd. | Redlands, CA 92373
(909) 890-1255 | [email protected] | www.erscinc.com
March 12, 2025
City of Hesperia
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia, CA 92345
Attn: Enrique Villalobos
RE: Fee Proposal - Engineering & Public Works Plan Check services Dear Mr. Villalobos & Members of the Selection Committee, Engineering Resources of Southern California (ERSC) is pleased to have the opportunity to submit our fee proposal to the City of Hesperia (City) as a qualified, experienced consultant to provide On-Call Plan & Map Checking Services.

Enclosed for evaluation is ERSC’s current hourly fee schedule. ERSC proposes the use of the enclosed fee schedule during the initial term of a professional services agreement with the City. We welcome the opportunity to negotiate our proposed fee if the City deems it necessary.

On behalf of our entire team, I would like to thank Hesperia staff for the opportunity to submit our proposal to serve your City. Our team members remain available to answer any questions that arise. The individuals signing this document are authorized to bind ERSC in an agreement with the City of Hesperia. This proposal and fees presented herein are valid for a period of 180 days from the date of submittal.

If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please contact me at 909-890-1255 x102 or by email at [email protected].

Respectfully submitted,
John M. Brudin, PE Craig Brudin, QSP
President Direct or of Operations

<Section Title>###
<Section Title>Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. | Schedule of Rates Professional Staff
President ........................................................................... $305.00 Vice President .................................................................... $260.00 Sr. Principal Engineer ......................................................... $255.00 Principal Engineer .............................................................. $230.00 Assistant Principal Engineer .............................................. $215.00 Engineer V ......................................................................... $195.00 Engineer IV ........................................................................ $175.00 Engineer III ........................................................................ $160.00 Engineer II ......................................................................... $145.00 Engineer I .......................................................................... $130.00 Engineering Staff
Principal Engineering Associate ......................................... $210.00 Senior Engineering Associate ............................................ $190.00 Engineering Associate V .................................................... $165.00 Engineering Associate IV ................................................... $145.00 Engineering Associate III.................................................... $135.00 Engineering Associate II..................................................... $120.00 Engineering Associate I...................................................... $115.00 Engineering Aide II .............................................................. $65.00 Engineering Aide I ............................................................... $60.00 Survey Staff and Services
Principal Surveyor.............................................................. $215.00 Senior Surveyor ................................................................. $175.00 Surveyor III ........................................................................ $140.00 Surveyor II ......................................................................... $125.00 Surveyor I .......................................................................... $105.00 2-Man Survey Crew (Std Equipment/Truck) ...................... $320.00 1-Man Survey Crew (Std Equipment/Truck) ...................... $250.00 3rd Man on Survey Crew ................................................... $140.00 Construction Support Staff
Construction Manager ....................................................... $185.00 Chief Construction Inspector ............................................. $145.00 Sr. Construction Inspector ................................................. $135.00 Construction Inspector ...................................................... $125.00 Inspector Overtime (Hours 8-12/Saturdays) ..................... $175.00 Inspector Overtime (Hours 12+/Sundays) ......................... $205.00 Administrative Staff
Operations Manager ......................................................... $120.00 Operations Specialist ......................................................... $100.00 Administrative Assistant II ................................................... $90.00 Administrative Assistant I .................................................... $80.00 Other Direct Expenses
Vehicle Mileage ................................................ $0.70/Mile Subconsultant ................................................... Cost + 20% Reimbursable Expenses/Charges ..................... Cost + 15% Forensic Analysis ................................. Standard Rate X 2 Expert Witness .................................... Standard Rate X 3 NOTE: All rates hereon are subject to automatic increase upon July 1st of each year. Rates will be adjusted by the percent increase in California Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers for the twelve-month period ending February as calculated by the California Department of Industrial Relations (CADIR) California Consumer Price Index Calculator. Prevailing Wage Rates are dictated by the CADIR. All classifications which are subject to Prevailing Wages will be adjusted when revised determinations are published by the CADIR.

Unless otherwise established by contractual agreement,
payment is due and payable upon receipt. Payment is considered delinquent if not paid within 30 days of invoice date. If payment is not completed within agreed terms, Client agrees to pay a service charge on the amount past due at the rate of 1.5% per month (18% per annum).

City of Hesperia - March 2025

'2.0 .,,,_
_.r.. ... UJ mn Ii
Engineering RfS;CiWrces o Southern California
1/

03/17/2025
On-Call Engineering & Public
Works Plan Check Services
RFP# 2025-02
Fee Schedule

1 Lea
ding the Way Through Superior Client Service, Innovation, and a Commitment to Excellence 8885 Haven Ave., Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 | P: 909.989.9789 | F: 909.989.9660 | www.westlandgroup.net Engineering | Geospatial | Land Planning

CITY OF HESPERIA
RFP# 2025-02
WESTLAND GROUP, INC. 2025 RATE TABLE
Professional Services Fee Schedule effective through December 31, 2028

PLAN CHECKING SERVICES
Project Manager ...................................................................................................................................... $185/hr Project Engineer/Surveyor ...................................................................................................................... $165/hr Staff Engineer/Survey Analyst ................................................................................................................. $135/hr This rate schedule is for the period from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2028. The rate schedule may be subject to an adjustment based on an escalation percentage based on the California CPI, or other negotiated escalation value.

9329 Mariposa Road. Suite 205 | Hesperia, CA 92344

www.transtech.org
855.595.2495 (toll-free)
March 12, 2025
Ci
ty of HESPERIA
Submitted by email to:

Deanna Lestina, Project Manager
E: [email protected]
Fee Schedule
RFP 2025-02, ON-CALL ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS PLAN CHECK SERVICES As r
equested, Transtech is pleased to submit its FEE SCHEDULE for the subject RFP.

Sh
ould you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact the undersigned.

Sinc
erely,
Ray Casey
Ray Casey, PE, Contract Principal
E: [email protected]
E: [email protected]
C: 951-453-1957

FEE SCHEDULE
RFP 2025-02, ON-CALL ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS PLAN CHECK SERVICES Field Technician $88 - $98 Labor Compliance Analyst $150 - $160 Engineering Technician $98 - $109 Funds Coordinator $155 - $165 Assistant CAD Dr after $109 - $124 Office Engineer $150 - $160 Senior CAD Drafter $124 - $140 Construction Inspector $145 - $155 Associate Designer $140 - $155 Senior Construction Inspector $155 - $165 Senior Designer $155 - $171 Construction Manager $176 - $191 Design Project Manager $196 - $206 Resident Engineer $191 - $206 Assistant Engineer $119 - $129
Associate / Staff Engineer $150 - $165 Public Works Inspector $145 - $155 Senior Civil Engineer $206 - $227 Senior Public Works Inspector $155 - $165 Traffic Analyst Technician $103 - $114 Supervising PW Inspector $165 - $176 Associate Traffic Analyst $155 - $165
Senior Traffic Analyst $165 - $176 Survey Analyst $155 - $160 Professional Transportation Planner $176 - $191 Senior Survey Analyst $160 - $165 Traffic Engineer Technician $98 - $109 2-Man Survey Crew $357 - $372 Associate/Staff Traffic Engineer $150 - $165 Survey & Mapping Specialist $191 - $207 Traffic Engineer $176 - $191 Licensed Land Surveyor $217 - $227 Senior Traffic Engineer $191 - $212
Project Manager $191 - $212 Funds Analyst $150 - $155
Senior Project Manager $212 - $227 Senior Funds Analyst $155 - $165 Deputy City Engineer $176 - $196 Grant Writer $171 - $176 City Engineer $196 - $212 Funds & Grant Project Manager $191 - $202 Principal Engineer $212 - $233
Community Development Technician $83 - $93
Permit Technician $78 - $88 Planning Technician $93 - $103 Plan Check Technician/Analyst/Supervisor $129 - $145 Assistant Planner $103 - $124 Building Inspector $119 - $134 Associate Planner $124 - $145 Senior Inspector $129 - $145 Senior Planner $150 - $171 Plans Examiner/Checker $145 - $160 Planning Manager $176 - $196 Plan Check Engineer $155 - $176
Deputy Building Official $165 - $176 Administrative/Clerical $72 - $83 Building Official $171 - $186 Project Accountant $83 - $93 TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC.

SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
Effective: July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025
Rates are average ranges, negotiable and can be adjusted to establish a fee for each assignment based on the specific project’s scope, when such projects are identified by the City.

The above fees are increased each year July 1st automatically by the percentage change Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the preceding twelve-month period as calculated for February by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics and published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistic.

FUNDING & GRANT WRITING

PLANNING

ADMI NI S TRATI VE S TAFF

SURVEY AND MAPPING

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION

BUILDING & SAFETY

ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

City of Hesperia

STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council Members
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District

FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Cassandra Sanchez, Director of Public Works/City Engineer

SUBJECT: Consideration of the US-395 Utility Agreement with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District approve a utility agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for the reimbursement associated with the relocation of a portion of w aterline within the City of Hesperia on US-395 Highway.

BACKGROUND

The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) is developing plans to relieve congestion and enhance the safety and operational efficiency of United States 395 (US -395).

This project would widen US -395 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, with a continuous median, for approximately 7 miles between I-15 and SR-18 (Palmdale Road).

The City of Hesperia has a portion of waterline within the project limit that is shallow and requires to be relocated and/or lowered to accommodate SBCTA’s project.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

Due to prior rights, the City will be reimbursed by SBCTA for the actual costs per the terms of the agreement for the design and construction associated with the relocation o f the waterline in conflict with the US-395 project. The agreement will allow the City of Hesperia to recover 100% of the costs to relocate and/or lower the City’s waterline.

CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM

Future Development - Facilitate balanced growth to ensure cohesive community development and pursue economic development.

FISCAL IMPACT
This agreement allows the City to be fully reimbursed for all actual costs associated with the relocation of the waterline within the US-395.

Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members, Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District Approval of Utility Agreement with SBCTA
April 15, 2025

ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. If the Council chooses not to approve this agreement, then this will stop the construction of SBCTA’s project and the widening of the 395 until a solution can be reached.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. SBCTA Utility Agreement

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 1 of 5

UTILITY AGREEMENT

SBCTA Contract 25-1003274

ADA NOTICE For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms Management Unit (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Form Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

DISTRICT
08 COUNTY
San Bernardino
ROUTE
395

POST MILE
08-SBD-395 PM R4.0/11.2

PROJECT ID
0813000222
EA: 08-0F633

FEDERAL AID NUMBER
6507(034)
OWNER’S FILE NUMBER
XXXXX

FEDERAL PARTICIPATION/FEDERALLY ELIGIBLE/ NEPA DOCUMENT On the project YES NO On the Utilities YES NO UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 25-1003274 DATE __________

The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) is developing plans to relieve congestion and enhance the safety and operational efficiency of United States 395 (US -395). This project would widen US-395 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, with a continuous median, for a distance of approximately 7 miles between I-15 and SR-18 (Palmdale Road). and
Name: City of Hesperia

ADDRESS: 9 700 Seventh Ave. Hesperia, CA 92345

hereinafter called “OWNER”, owns and maintains
Water f acilities on US-395 in the City of Hesperia

within the limits of SBCTA’s Project which requires
relocation, and/or adjustment in order to accommodate SBC TA’s Project. The facility(ies) to be relocated, and/or adjusted are more particularly described in Plan No. XXXXX. to accommodate SBCTA’s project.

It is hereby mutually agreed that:

I. WORK TO BE DONE

In accordance with Notice to Owner No. 395- COH01 dated x-xx-xxxx, Owner shall relocate, adjust, and/or remove water facilities on or along US-395 in the City of Hesperia. All work shall be performed substantially in accordance with Owner’s plan No. XXXXX consisting of XX sheets, a copy of which is on file in the SBCTA office at 1170 W 3rd St, San Bernardino, CA 92410.

D
eviations from the OWNER’s plan described above initiated by either SBCTA or OWNER, shall be agreed upon by both parties hereto under a Revised Notice to Owner. Such Revised Notices to Owner, approved by SBCTA and agreed to/acknowledged by OWNER, will constitute an approved revision of the OWNER’s plan described above and are hereby made a part hereof. No work under said deviation shall commence prior to written execution by OWNER of the Revised Notice to Owner. Changes in the scope of the work will require an amendment to this Agreement in addition to the revised Notice to Owner.

II. LIABILITY FOR WORK

Existing facilities are located in their present position pursuant to rights superior to those of the SBCTA and will be relocated at 100% SBCTA’s expense.

III. PERFORMANCE OF WORK

OWNER agrees to perform the herein described work with its own forces or to cause the herein described work to be performed by the OWNER’s contractor, employed by written contract on a continuing basis to perform work of this type,

UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page 2 of 5
SBCTA Contract 25-1003274

UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 25-1003274

and to provide and furnish all necessary labor, materials, tools, and equipment required therefore, and to prosecute said work diligently to completion.

Use of personnel requiring lodging and meal “per diem” expenses will not be allowed without prior written authorization by SBCTA’s representative. Requests for such authorization must be contained in OWNER’s estimate of actual and necessary relocation costs. OWNER shall include an explanation why local employee or contract labor is not considered adequate for the relocation work proposed. Per Diem expenses shall not exceed the per diem expense amounts allowed under the California Department of Human Resources travel expense guidelines.

Work performed by OWNER’s contractor is a public work under the definition of Labor Code Section 1720(a) and is therefore subject to prevailing wage requirements; but, work performed directly by Owner’s employees falls within the exception of Labor Code Section 1720(a)(1) and does not constitute a public work under Section 1720(a)(2) and is not subject to prevailing wages. OWNER shall verify compliance with this requirement in the administration of its contracts referenced above.

IV. PAYMENT FOR WORK

SBCTA shall pay its share of the actual and necessary cost of the herein described work within 45 days after receipt of OWNER’s itemized bill, signed by a responsible official of OWNER’s organization and prepared on OWNER’s letterhead, compiled on the basis of the actual and necessary cost and expense incurred and charged or allocated to said work in accordance with the uniform system of accounts prescribed for OWNER by the California Public Utilities Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or Federal C ommunications Commission, whichever is applicable.

It is understood and agreed that SBCTA will not pay for any betterment or increase in capacity of OWNER’s facilities in the new location and that OWNER shall give credit to the SBCTA for the accrued depreciation of the replaced facilities and for the salvage value of any material or parts salvaged and retained or sold by OWNER.

Not more frequently than once a month, but at least quarterly, OWNER will prepare and submit detailed itemized progress bills for costs incurred not to exceed OWNER’s recorded costs as of the billing date less estimated credits applicable to completed work. Payment of progress bills not to exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made under the terms of this Agreement. Payment of progress bills which exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made after receipt and approval by SBCTA of documentation supporting the cost increase and after an Amendment to this Agreement has been executed by the parties to this Agreement.

The OWNER shall submit a final bill to SBCTA within 360 days after the completion of the work described in Section I above. If SBCTA has not received a final bill within 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER’s work described in Section I of this Agreement, and SBCTA has delivered to OWNER fully executed Director’s Deeds, Consents to Common Use or Joint Use Agreements for OWNER’s facilities (if required), SBCTA will provide written notification to OWNER of its intent to close its file within 30 days. OWNER hereby acknowledges, to the extent allowed by law, that all remaining costs will be deemed to have been abandoned. If SBCTA processes a final bill for payment more than 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER’s work, payment of the late bill may be subject to allocation and/or approval by the California Transportation Commission.

The final billing shall be in the form of an itemized statement of the total costs charged to the project, less the credits provided for in this Agreement, and less any amounts covered by progress billings. However, SBCTA shall not pay final bills, which exceed the estimated cost of this Agreement without documentation of the reason for the increase of said cost from the OWNER and approval of documentation by SBCTA. Except, if the final bill exceeds the OWNER’s estimated costs solely as the result of a revised Notice to Owner as provided for in Section I, a copy of said revised Notice to Owner shall suffice as documentation.

In any event if the final bill exceeds 125% of the estimated cost of this Agreement, an amended Agreement shall be executed by the parties to this Agreement prior to the payment of the OWNERS final bill. Any and all increases in costs that are the direct result of deviations from the work described in Section I of this Agreement shall have the prior concurrence of SBCTA.

UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page 3 of 5
SBCTA Contract 25-1003274

UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 25-1003274

Detailed records from which the billing is compiled shall be retained by the OWNER for a period of three years from the date of the final payment and will be available for audit in accordance with Contract Cost Principals and Procedures as set forth in 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Subpart E, Part 31 by SBCTA and/or Federal Auditors. In performing work under this Agreement, OWNER agrees to comply with the Uniform System of Accounts for Public Utilities found at 18 CFR, Parts 101, 201, et al., to the extent they are applicable to OWNER doing work on the project that is the subject of this agreement, the contract cost principles and procedures as set forth in 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645 and 2 CFR, Part 200, et al. If a subsequent State and/or Federal audit determines payments to be unallowable, OWNER agrees to reimburse SBCTA upon receipt of SBCTA billing. If OWNER is subject to repayment due to failure by SBCTA to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances, then SBCTA will ensure that OWNER is compensated for actual cost in performing work under this agreement.

OWNER, at the present time, does not have sufficient funds available to proceed with the relocation of OWNER's facilities provided for herein. It is estimated that the cost of the work provided for by this Agreement and, as hereinafter set forth, is the sum of $_______SBCTA agrees to advance to OWNER the sum of $ to apply to the cost of the work to be undertaken as provided hereinabove. Said sum of $_________will be deposited by the SBCTA with OWNER within 45 days after execution of the Agreement by the parties hereto and upon receipt of an OWNER's bill for the advance.

It is further agreed that upon receipt of the monies agreed upon to be advanced by SBCTA herein, OWNER will deposit said monies in a separate interest-bearing account or trust fund in State or National Banks in California having the legal custody of said monies in accordance with and subject to the applicable provisions of Section 53630, et seq., of the Government Code, and all interest earned by said monies advanced by SBCTA and deposited as provided for above shall be credited to SBCTA.

In the event actual relocation and necessary costs as established herein are less than the sum of money advanced by SBCTA to OWNER, OWNER hereby agrees to refund to SBCTA the difference between said actual and necessary cost and the sum of money that was advanced. The remittance check for the balance of advanced funds will be separate from the remittance check for the earned interest. In the event that the actual and necessary cost of relocation exceeds the amount of money advanced to OWNER, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, SBCTA will reimburse OWNER said excess costs upon receipt of an itemized bill as set forth herein.

V. GENERAL CONDITIONS

All costs accrued by OWNER as a result of SBC
TA’s request of November 20, 2024, to review, study and/or prepare relocation plans and estimates for the project associated with this Agreement may be billed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

I
f SBCTA’s project which precipitated this Agreement is canceled or modified so as to eliminate the necessity of work by OWNER, SBCTA will notify OWNER in writing, and SBCTA reserves the right to terminate this Agreement by Amendment. The Amendment shall provide mutually acceptable terms and conditions for terminating the Agreement.

All obligations of SBCTA under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the acceptance of the Agreement by SBCTA’s Board of Directors or the Delegated Authority (as applicable), the passage of the annual Budget Act by the State Legislature, and the allocation of those funds by the California Transportation Commission.

OWNER shall submit a Notice of Completion to the SBCTA within 30 days of the completion of the work described herein.

Where OWNER has prior rights in areas which will be within the highway right of way and where OWNER's facilities will remain on or be relocated on LOCAL AGENCY highway right of way, a Joint Use Agreement or Consent to Common Use Agreement shall be executed by the parties.

It is understood that said highway is a Federal aid highway and accordingly, 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645 is hereby incorporated into this Agreement.

UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page 4 of 5
SBCTA Contract 25-1003274

UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 25-1003274

In addition, the provisions of 23 CFR 635.410, BA, are also incorporated into this agreement. The BA requirements are further specified in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP -21), section 1518; 23 CFR 635.410 requires that all manufacturing processes have occurred in the United States for steel and iron products (including the application of coatings) installed on a project receiving funding from the FHWA.

OWNER understands and acknowledges that this project is subject to the requirements of the Buy America law (23 U.S.C., Section 313) and applicable regulations, including 23 CFR 635.410 and FHWA guidance, and will demonstrate Buy America compliance by collecting written certification(s) from the vendor(s) or by collecting written certification(s) from the manufacturer(s) mill test report (MTR). Certification(s) should state, “All manufacturing processes for these steel and iron materials, including the application of coatings have occurred in the United States. All manufacturing processes means melting of the steel through final manufacturing of steel components.

All documents obtained to demonstrate Buy America compliance will be held by the OWNER for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to the OWNER and will be made available to STATE or FHWA upon request.

One set of copies of all documents obtained to demonstrate Buy America compliance will be attached to, and submitted with, the final invoice.

This does not include products for which waivers have been granted under 23 CFR 635.410 or other applicable provisions or excluded material cited in the Department’s guidelines for the implementation of Buy America requirements for utility relocations issued on December 3, 2013.

If, in connection with OWNER’s performance of the Work hereunder, SBCTA provides to OWNER any materials that are subject to the Buy America Rule, SBCTA acknowledges and agrees that SBCTA shall be solely responsible for satisfying any and all requirements relative to the Buy America Rule concerning the materials thus provided (including, but not limited to, ensuring and certifying that said materials comply with the requirements of the Buy America Rule).

SBCTA further acknowledges that OWNER, in complying with the Buy America Rule, is expressly relying upon the instructions and guidance (collectively, “Guidance”) issued by Caltrans and its representatives concerning the Buy America Rule requirements for utility relocations within the State of California. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, OWNER shall not be deemed in breach of this Agreement for any violations of the Buy America Rule if OWNER’s actions are in compliance with the Guidance.

THE ESTIMATED COST TO SBCTA FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WORK IS $XX.XX

Signatures on following page.

UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page 5 of 5
SBCTA Contract 25-1003274

UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 25-1003274

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this Agreement the day and year above written.

AGENCY: OWNER:

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CITY OF HESPERIA

AUTHORITY

By By
Kristi Lynn Harris Date Date
Director of Project Delivery

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By
Julianna K. Tillquist Date
General Counsel

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

City of Hesperia

STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Steve Allen, Captain
Jonathan Rizzardi, Sergeant

SUBJECT: Purchase of Audio / Video System for Interview and Observation Rooms

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Genetec Audio / Video system for a not to exceed amount of $52,135 to replace the video recording system in the two interview rooms and two observation rooms at the Hesperia Police Department building.

BACKGROUND

The Hesperia Police Department’s Investigations Division regularly u ses audio / video recorded interview rooms and observation rooms during investigations. This allows investigators to conduct in-depth interviews with a victim, witness, or suspect in a remote location that is audio and video recorded. These recordings provide crucial evidence for court proceedings. Since the network disruption, security measures have been put in place to safeguard the secure network.

Unfortunately, the current audio / video system installed in the interview rooms and observation rooms is antiquated and it is not possible to update the software to comply with security measures for the network. Additionally, it is currently not possible to download audio or video from the current system, impeding criminal investigations.

ISSUES/ANALYSIS

Criminal investigations are hindered by not having the ability to record and download interviews, creating a negative impact on court proceedings. In the past year, there have been two separate interviews where the suspects confessed to felonies during the interview. Not having the appropriate system in place to capture the interview was detrimental to the investigation. Although the Station was able to work around these two interviews and ultimately obtain the recordings, this required significant resources which cannot be used on a regular basis.

The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department has worked with Genetec for many years and their system has become the department standard for all audio / video system needs. The system is currently used in our jail system and several stations throughout the county. Genetec is a secure platform which meets the standards and needs for law enforcement confidentiality. The purchase of the Genetec audio / video recording system to replace the current system will allow investigators the ability to record interviews. This will get the Station back on track with the necessary equipment necessary to provide valuable evidence for the judicial process of criminal investigations.

Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Purchase of Audio/Video for Interview and Observation Rooms April 15, 2025

CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM

Public Safety - Ensure public safety resources adequately protect our community.

FISCAL IMPACT

On March 04, 2025, the City Council approved a budget amendment for this upgrade with the Mid-Year Budget report. This staff report is to allow the City Manager to contract with Genetec Audio / Video Systems to replace the current system for the two interview rooms and two observation rooms at a not to exceed cost of $52,135.

ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S)

None

City of Hesperia

STAFF REPORT

DATE: April 15, 2025
TO: Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Nathan R. Freeman, Director of Development Services Eydee Jimenez, Economic Development Supervisor

SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Adoption of the Community Development Block Grant 2025- 2029 Consolidated Plan and the 2025-2026 Action Plan

RECOMMENDED ACTION

It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and, upon accepting public testimony:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025 -09, approving a) the City’s Five Year 2025 -2029 Consolidated Plan; and b) the 2025 -2026 Action Plan, including any modifications or amendments as directed by the City Council;

2. Authorize staff to modify the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025-2026 Action Plan based on City Council’s direction; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute and transmit all necessary documents, ensuring the City’s timely receipt of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.

BACKGROUND

The City of Hesperia receives CDBG fund s from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) annually. To continue receiving these funds, the City must prepare and submit the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, which establishes a strategic vision for housing, community, and economic development actions.

Additionally, e ach year , HUD requires the submission of a one-year Action Plan detailing planned projects, goals, and budgets for the CDBG program. The 2025 -2026 Action Plan represents the first year of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.

Consolidated Plan (2025-2029)

Covering the period of July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2029, the Consolidated Plan identifies housing and community development priorities and strategies. The needs analysis incorporates data from the 2020 American Communit y Sur vey 5 -Year Estimates, HUD -supplied data, a public hearing, two community meetings held in October 2024, and consultations with local agencies and stakeholders.

A community needs survey was conducted, receiving 207 responses. The 2025-2029 Consolidated Pla n aligns CDBG fund usage with HUD’s national goals to provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities for low - and moderate-income families.

Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025-2026 Action Plan
April 15, 2025

Priority Needs and Goals:

 Public Facility and Infrastructure Improvements – Enhancing public infrastructure to create a suitable living environment.
 Equal Access to Housing Opportunities – Supporting fair housing initiatives.

Goals:

 Public Facility and Infrastructure Improvements: Enhancing public infrastructure for low- and moderate-income individuals, including the elderly and disabled.  Fair Housing Services: Furthering fair housing through education, counseling, anti - discrimination measures, and landlord-tenant mediation.  Planning and Administration: Ensuring comp liance with federal regulations to implement priority needs and goals.

One-Year Action Plan (2025-2026)

The 2025-2026 Action Plan outlines goals, budgets, and projects for the CDBG program from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. The City anticipates receivi ng approximately $972,781 in CDBG funds for the following projects:

Activity Budget (Estimated)
Street Improvement Project $848,781
Fair Housing Services $24,000
Program Administration $100,000
Total: $972,781

Citizen Participation in the Development of all Plans

In compliance with federal regulations and the City’s Citizen Participation Plan, the Notice of Public Hearing and document availability were published in the Victorville Daily Press on March 16, 2025.

Draft documents were avai lable for public review from March 16, 2025, through April 15, 2025, at the Hesperia Economic Development division, City Clerk’s Office, Hesperia Public Library, and on the City’s website. The public hearing on April 15, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. offers further opportunities for public input. Comments received will be incorporated into the final document before submission to HUD.

Department Recommendations

Exhibit A includes recommendations for 2025 -2026 CDBG-funded activities. All recommended activities have re ceived prior CDBG funding and are monitored by the City’s Economic Development division for compliance. The City Council may modify or reject staff recommendations and propose alternative allocations.

Following the 30 -day review period, the City Council i s enc ouraged to adopt the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the 2025-2026 Action Plan on April 15, 2025. Staff will adjust activity budgets per City Council direction before submission to HUD.

Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025-2026 Action Plan
April 15, 2025

CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM

Future Development - Facilitate balanced growth to ensure cohesive community development and pursue economic development.

FISCAL IMPACT

To receive annual allocations, HUD requires submission of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the 2025-2026 Action Plan . The City’s 2025 -2026 CDBG en titlement is approximately $972,781. Approval of the recommended action adopts the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the 2025-2026 Action Plan and allocates resources for programs and activities, integrating them into the Economic Development division’s 2025-2026 CDBG budget. CDBG funds may only be used for eligible expenses as outlined in the 2025-2026 Action Plan.

ALTERNATIVE(S)

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution No. 2025-09

2. Application Notebooks (Binders provided under separate cover)

3. Exhibit A: Department Action Plan Budget Recommendation

4. Exhibit B: Application Summary Matrix

5. A copy of the draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and draft 2025-2026 Action Plan (on file with the City Clerk and available on the City’s website)

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-09

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2025-2029 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND THE 2025-2026 ACTION PLA N FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

GRANT PROGRAM

WHEREAS, the City of Hesperia (City), is a municipal corporation duly organized under the laws and Constitution of the State of California; and

WHEREAS, the City is an entitlement jurisdiction for federal Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG); and

WHEREAS, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the City to adopt and implement a Five -Year Consolidated Plan (Plan) to allocate its annual entitlement of CDBG funds in support of projects and activities that primarily benefit low- and moderate-income residents; and

WHEREAS, the 2025-2026 Action Plan outlines specific goals and anticipated accomplishments for the Consolidated Plan period through the expenditure of CDBG funds and other identified funding sources; and

WHEREAS, the City began preparing the Five -Year 2025 -2029 Consolidated Plan by holding two publicly noticed community meetings in October 2024 and conducting a community survey to solicit input from residents, loc al public service organizations, and other stakeholders regarding community needs; and

WHEREAS, the City initiated preparation of the One -Year 2025 -2026 Action Plan by distributing CDBG applications in January 2025; and

WHEREAS, the City accepted applications for CDBG funding until February 19, 2025; and

WHEREAS, the City’s Economic Development division evaluated eligible applications and developed funding recommendations for inclusion in the One-Year 2025-2026 Action Plan; and

WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed, ratified, and/or modified the EDD's funding recommendations during its April 15, 2025, meeting; and

WHEREAS, the City anticipates receiving a 2025 -2026 CDBG entitlement award of $972,781 and will make proportional adj ustments to approved activities upon notification of the final entitlement amount; and

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council approved the 2025 -2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025 -2026 Action Plan and authorized their submission to HUD.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings.

Section 2. The City Council approves the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025-2026 Action Plan, including all attachments, as presented.

Section 3. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute all necessary documents and any certifications to implement the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025-2026 Action Plan.

Section 4. The City Council further authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to approve any modifications and/or amendments to the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025- 2026 Action Plan as needed, to ensure HUD approval, including any adjustments required for compliance with CDBG regulations.

Section 5. The 2025-2026 Action Plan’s CDBG funds shall be incorporated into the City’s 2025-2026 Economic Development division budget and are approved for expenditure.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of April 2025.

______________________________
Allison Lee, Mayor
ATTEST:

____________________________
Jessica Giber
Deputy City Clerk

ATTACHMENT 2 AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE

Funding Categories Applicant Program/Project Applicant Request Staff Recommendations
City Council
Approval
Public Services
(Funded through
Community Assistance
Program)
N/A $ - $ - $ - City - FY 24-25 CDBG Street Improvement Project, CO 7175 848,781$ 848,781$ -$ -$ -$
Sub Total 848,781$ 848,781$ -$ City - CDBG Administration 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board 24,000$ 24,000$ -$ Sub Total 124,000$ 124,000$ -$ 848,781$ 848,781$ -$ 124,000$ 124,000$ -$ Grand Total 972,781$ 972,781$ -$ TOTALS
Exhibit A: Staff Recommendations
Other Programs
Administration
(Not to exceed 20% of
annual allocation $194,556)
Other Programs Total
April 15, 2025
Admin Total
2025-2026 CDBG Entitlement: $972,781
Total 2025-2026 Budget: $972,781

Exhibit B
Application Matrix
Applicant Program Description Location
Proposed Persons
Served
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
17-18
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
18-19
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
19-20
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
20-21
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
21-22
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
22-23
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
23-24
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
24-25
Current Year
Funding
25-26
Committed/
Uncommitted
Funding
Sources
City of Hesperia - CDBG Administration CDBG Program Administration Hesperia N/A $175,651 $191,636 $86,694 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $140,000 $100,000 $0 Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) Fair Housing and Landlord/Tenant Mediation Ontario 20 FH/50 LT People $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $20,000 $22,000 $24,000 $589,426 $115,000 $120,000 $162,000 $124,000 $589,426
City of Hesperia - Development Services Street Improvement Project Hesperia 3,000 People $678,115 $606,546 $977,972 $700,000 $174,639 $877,601 $779,363 $810,781 $848,781 $0 $848,781 $0Housing, Econ Dev, & Other Community Dev. Sub-Total Administration Activities (20% max=$194,556) FY 25-26
Public Services FY 25-26 (funded through Community Assistance Program) Housing, Economic Dev, & Other Community Dev. Programs FY 25-26 Administration Activities Subtotal requested

Applicant Location
Persons
Served
Prev. Yr.

Budget 04-
05 Prev. Yr.

Budget 05-
06 Prev. Yr.

Budget 06-
07 Prev. Yr
Budget
07-08
Funds
Requested
08-09
Public Services (15% max= $109,108)
Victor Valley Domestic Violence Victorville 30 + $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 Moses House Ministries Victorville 75 $0 $5,000 **$7,500 $7,500 $7,500 Inland Fair Housing Ontario 502 $16,636 $16,636 $10,000 ** $21,961 Hi Desert Meals on Wheels Victorville 200 $5,000 $5,000 **$10,000 $14,500 $14,000 Mojave Deaf Services Victorville 20 $2,100 did not apply $5,000 $5,000 $6,500 Call for Life Hesperia 600 n/a $5,000 $7,500 $0 $12,000 High Desert Homeless Victorville 90 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $7,500 $15,000 City of Hesperia-Graffiti Removal Hesperia 10,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $17,000 $25,000 San Bernardino County Library San Bernardino 35 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 City of Hesperia-Police Services Hesperia 8,200 $29,940 $29,920 $29,920 $32,420 $139,216 Hand to Hand Outreach, Inc. Hesperia 50 did not apply did not apply did not apply did not apply $69,100 Hesperia Equestrian patrol Hesperia City did not apply did not apply did not apply did not apply $1,000 High Desert Domestic Violence Program Victorville 320 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $7,500 no app Vista Guidance Centers Victorville 50 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 no app We Really Care Hesperia 20,000 did not apply did not apply did not apply did not apply $75,000 Public Services Subtotal requested $88,676 $96,556 $87,420 $111,420 $401,277

Applicant
Public Services (15% max= $109,108)
Victor Valley Domestic Violence
Moses House Ministries
Inland Fair Housing
Hi Desert Meals on Wheels
Mojave Deaf Services
Call for Life
High Desert Homeless
City of Hesperia-Graffiti Removal
San Bernardino County Library
City of Hesperia-Police Services
Hand to Hand Outreach, Inc.

Hesperia Equestrian patrol
High Desert Domestic Violence Program
Vista Guidance Centers
We Really Care
Public Services Subtotal requested
CDBG
Funds %
of Total 35%
Personal to
Total
Request % 20%
Cost per
Individual % 45%
Weighted
Average

1.75% 0.61% 0.00% 0.00% 0.30% 0.14% 0.75%

2.33% 0.82% 0.00% 0.00% 1.00% 0.45% 1.27%

5.90% 2.06% 0.20% 0.04% 2.29% 1.03% 3.13%

8.14% 2.85% 0.00% 0.00% 1.43% 0.64% 3.49%

16.01% 5.60% 7.39% 1.48% 0.31% 0.14% 7.22%

47.61% 16.66% 0.00% 0.00% 5.00% 2.25% 18.91%

7.16% 2.51% 100.00% 20.00% 0.60% 0.27% 22.78%

50.00% 17.50% 34.00% 6.80% 4.00% 1.80% 26.10%

25.46% 8.91% 100.00% 20.00% 0.01% 0.00% 28.91%

42.56% 14.90% 100.00% 20.00% 5.89% 2.65% 37.55%

96.51% 33.78% 31.26% 6.25% 0.07% 0.03% 40.06%

58.82% 20.59% Total City - N?A - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - -
Budget is not completed properly.

35.00% 20.00% 45.00%

City Counil Approval
Council Amt. Project
Ed Pack $5,000 High Desert Homeless
Paul B. $5,000 Moses House
Thurston $5,000 VV Domestic Violence
Rita V. $5,000 City Police
Mike L. $5,000 City Police

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan
2025-2026 Action Plan

DRAFT - April 2025

This page is intentionally left blank.

Hesperia City Council

Allison Lee
Mayor

Cameron Gregg
Mayor Pro Tem

Brigit Bennington
Council Member

Chris Ochoa
Council
Member

Josh Pullen
Council Member

This page is intentionally left blank.

i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 ES-05 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 The Process .................................................................................................................................... 5 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies .......................................................................................... 5 PR-10 Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 6 PR-15 Citizen Participation .......................................................................................................... 35 Needs Assessment ........................................................................................................................ 37 NA-05 Overview ........................................................................................................................... 37 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment ............................................................................................. 39 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems ..................................................51 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems .....................................61 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens ............................................66 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion................................................................. 68 NA-35 Public Housing................................................................................................................... 70 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment .......................................................................................... 73 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment .................................................................... 79 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs ............................................................ 84 Housing Market Analysis .............................................................................................................. 86 MA-05 Overview ........................................................................................................................... 86 MA-10 Number of Housing Units ................................................................................................. 87 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing ................................................................... 90 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) ......................................95 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing ........................................................................................... 99 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services ..................................................................................101 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services ..........................................................................105 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing .....................................................................................108 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets ..........................................................109 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ........................................................................115 MA-60 Broadband Needs ..........................................................................................................120

ii
MA-65 Hazard Mitigation ...........................................................................................................122 Strategic Plan ..............................................................................................................................123 SP-05 Overview ..........................................................................................................................123 SP-10 Geographic Priorities ........................................................................................................124 SP-25 Priority Needs ..................................................................................................................126 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions ......................................................................................128 SP-35 Anticipated Resources ....................................................................................................129 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure .......................................................................................132 SP-45 Goals Summary ...............................................................................................................135 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement ............................................................136 SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing .......................................................................................137 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy ..................................................................................................138 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards ...............................................................................................141 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy ......................................................................................................142 SP-80 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................143 AP-15 Expected Resources .........................................................................................................144 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................147 AP-35 Projects .......................................................................................................................... 148 AP-38 Project Summary.......................................................................................................... 149 AP-50 Geographic Distribution.............................................................................................. 150 AP-55 Affordable Housing ..................................................................................................... 151 AP-60 Public Housing .................................................................................................................152 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities .............................................................153 AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing ......................................................................................155 AP-85 Other Actions ...................................................................................................................156 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements ....................................................................................158 Table of Tables
Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary ................................................................................................ 2 Table 2– Responsible Agencies ................................................................................................... 5 Table 3– Agencies, groups, organizations who participated ................................................... 8

iii
Table 4– Other local / regional / federal planning efforts ......................................................... 34 Table 5 - Citizen Participation Outreach ................................................................................... 36 Table 1 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics ............................................................ 40 Table 2 - Number of Households Table .................................................................................... 40 Table 3 - Housing Problem 1 (Households with one of the listed needs) ............................. 41 Table 4 - Housing Problem 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems:

Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) .............. 42 Table 5 - Housing Problem 3 (Cost Burden 30-50%) ................................................................ 42 Table 6 - Housing Problem 3 (Cost Burden > 50%) .................................................................. 43 Table 7 - Housing Problem 4 (Crowding Information – More than one person per room) .43 Table 8 - Households with children under the age of 6 ........................................................... 43 Table 9 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI ............................................................ 52 Table 10 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI ....................................................... 52 Table 11 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI ....................................................... 53 Table 12 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI ..................................................... 53 Table 13 - Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI ................................................................... 61 Table 14 - Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI ................................................................. 62 Table 15 - Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI ................................................................. 62 Table 16 - Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI ............................................................... 63 Table 17 - Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI .............................................................. 66 Table 18 - Public Housing by Program Type............................................................................. 70 Table 19 - Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type ............................ 70 Table 20 - Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type ............................................. 71 Table 21 - Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type ...................................... 71 Table 22 - Homeless Needs Assessment ................................................................................... 75 Table 23 - Nature and Extent of Homelessness ........................................................................ 77 Table 24 - Residential Properties by Unit Number .................................................................. 87 Table 25 - Unit Size by Tenure ................................................................................................... 87 Table 26 - Rental Housing Costs ................................................................................................ 91 Table 27 - Cost of Housing .......................................................................................................... 91 Table 28 - Rent Paid .................................................................................................................... 91 Table 29 - Housing Affordability ................................................................................................ 91 Table 30 - Monthly Rent .............................................................................................................. 92 Table 31 - Condition of Units ....................................................................................................... 96 Table 32 - Year Unit Built ............................................................................................................. 96 Table 33 - Risk of Lead-Based Paint ........................................................................................... 96 Table 34 - Blood Lead Levels (BLLs) of children under the age of 6 ...................................... 97 Table 35 - Total Number of Units by Program Type ................................................................ 99 Table 36 - Public Housing Condition ......................................................................................... 99 Table 37 - Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households ................................. 101

i
v

Table 38 - Homeless Service Providers for the City of Hesperia .......................................... 103 Table 39 - Business Activity ..................................................................................................... 109 Table 40 - Labor Force .............................................................................................................. 110 Table 41 - Occupations by Sector ............................................................................................ 110 Table 42 - Travel Time ............................................................................................................... 110 Table 43 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) ..... 110 Table 44 - Educational Attainment by Age ............................................................................. 111 Table 45 - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months by Educational Attainment ................ 111 Table 46 - Strategic Plan Summary .......................................................................................... 123 Table 47 - Geographic Priority Areas ...................................................................................... 124 Table 48 – Priority Needs Summary ........................................................................................ 127 Table 49 – Influence of Market Conditions ............................................................................. 128 Table 50- Anticipated Resources .............................................................................................. 129 Table 51- Institutional Delivery Structure ................................................................................ 132 Table 52 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary ............................................................. 133 Table 53 – Goals Summary ....................................................................................................... 135 Table 54- Anticipated Resources .............................................................................................. 144 Table 55 – Goals Summary ....................................................................................................... 147 Table 56 – Project Information .............................................................................................. 148 Table 57 – Project Summary Information ............................................................................. 149 Table 58 - Geographic Distribution ....................................................................................... 150 Table 59 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement .............. 151 Table 60 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type ........................... 151 Table 61 – CDBG Requirements ............................................................................................... 158 Table 62 – Other CDBG Requirements .................................................................................... 158 Table of Figures
Figure 1 - Households ................................................................................................................. 39 Figure 2 - Most Prevalent Housing Problems ........................................................................... 48 Figure 3 - Households With >30-50% Cost Burden & >50% Cost Burden.............................. 49 Figure 4 - Race Alone .................................................................................................................. 51 Figure 5 - Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning <30% AMI ........................... 58 Figure 6 - Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning 30-50% AMI ........................ 59 Figure 7 - Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning 50-80% AMI ........................ 59 Figure 8 - Disproportionate Need Across Households Earning 80-100% AMI ...................... 60 Figure 9 - Disproportionate Need Across Households with Severe Housing Problems Earning <30% AMI ....................................................................................................................... 63 Figure 10 - Disproportionate Need Across Household with Severe Housing Problems Earning 30-50% AMI .................................................................................................................... 64

v
Figure 11 - Disproportionate Need Across Households with Severe Housing Problems Earning 50-80% AMI .................................................................................................................... 64 Figure 12 - Disproportionate Need Across Households with Severe Housing Problems Earning 80-100% AMI .................................................................................................................. 65 Figure 13 - Disproportionate Need Across Households Cost Burdened 30-50% of Income . ..................................................................................................................................................... 67 Figure 14 - Disproportionate Need Across Households Cost Burdened >50% of Income .. 67 Figure 15 - Overall Homelessness By Age ............................................................................... 75 Figure 16 - HIV Prevalence ........................................................................................................ 82 Figure 17 - Community Need For Public Facilities ................................................................... 84 Figure 18 - Community Need For Public Services .................................................................... 85 Figure 19 - Change in Median Rent and Income ..................................................................... 86 Figure 20 – Market Rate Rental Affordability ............................................................................ 89 Figure 21 - Median Home Value ................................................................................................ 90 Figure 22 - Units Affordable To Households By Income Range ............................................ 92 Figure 23 - Rent Differentials ...................................................................................................... 93 Figure 24 - Rental & Ownership Housing Income ................................................................... 94 Figure 25 - Community Need For Internet Reliability ............................................................. 120 Figure 26 - Community Need For Disaster Preparedness ..................................................... 122

Table of Maps
Map 1 - Households with Extremely Low-Income and Severe Cost Burden ......................... 44 Map 2 - Households with Low-income and Severe Cost Burden ........................................... 45 Map 3 - Households with Moderate-Income and Severe Cost Burden .................................. 46 Map 4 - Hispanic .......................................................................................................................... 54 Map 5 - White alone (not Hispanic) ............................................................................................ 55 Map 6 - Black /African American ............................................................................................... 56 Map 7 - Asian ................................................................................................................................ 57 Map 8 - Concentration Of Households With Multiple Housing Problems ............................116 Map 9 - Concentration Of Households With Low Income .....................................................117 Map 10 - Concentration Of Racial And Ethnic Minorities .........................................................118

1 Executive Summary
ES-05 Executive Summary

The City of Hesperia has prepared the 2025 –2029 Consolidated Plan, as required to receive federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. This Plan provides the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a comprehensive assessment of the City's housing and community development needs. It outlines the City’s priorities, objectives, and strategies for investing CDBG funds over the next five years, from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2030.

Each year, the City receives CDBG funds from HUD on a formula basis and allocates them to programs and projects that align with this Plan.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 established the CDBG Program, which is guided by three primary objectives used by HUD to evaluate each jurisdiction’s Consolidated Plan and its performance:

- Provide decent housing
- Create suitable living environments
- Expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income persons - According to CDBG regulations, every funded activity must meet one of the following national objectives:
- Benefit low- and moderate-income persons
- Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight - Address an urgent community development need (typically due to a natural disaster)

For the 2025 Program Year, the City anticipates receiving $972,781 in CDBG funds. The 2025–2026 Action Plan allocates these resources to the following program activities, which will be implemented between July 1, 2025, and June 30, 2026:
2025-2026 CDBG ACTIVITIES CAPITAL ACTIVITIES
Street Improvement Project $848,781

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ACTIVITIES
Fair Housing Services $24,000
CDBG Administration $100,000

2 Summary of Objectives and Outcomes from the Needs Assessment The priority needs and goals identified in the Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the Community Needs surveys and the housing and community development data elements required by HUD. Data required by HUD includes the 2016- 2020 American Community Survey (ACS) Five -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same time. Other sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through publicly available data.

In consideration of community input and available data, the priority needs established as part of this Plan are to:
- Provide public facility and infrastructure improvements to create a suitable living environment
- Ensure equal access to housing opportunities

Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG program to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of activities aligned with the following measurable goals included in the Strategic Plan section of this Plan.

Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary
Goal Name Category Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Public Facility and
Infrastructure
Improvements
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Provide public
facility and
infrastructure
improvements to
create a suitable
living
environment
CDBG:
$4,000,000
Public Facilities or
Infrastructure
Activities other
than Low-/Mod-
Income Housing
Benefit: 15,000
Persons Assisted
Fair Housing
Services
Affordable
Housing
Ensure equal
access for housing
opportunities
CDBG:
$110,000
Public Service
Activities other
than Low-/Mod-
Income Housing
Benefit: 350
Administration and
Planning
Admin All CDBG:
$500,000
Other – 5

3 Evaluation of Past Performance

The investment of HUD resources during the 2019–2023 Program Years had a significant impact on the City of Hesperia. In Program Year 2019, the global coronavirus pandemic began, and in 2020, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Through this legislation , the City received $1,119,947 in CDBG -CV funds to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the pandemic.

With the support of federal, state, and local resources, the City of Hesperia and its partners were able to deliver essential services to low - and moderate-income residents.

These included supportive services, improvements to community facilities, and infrastructure enhancements. The City continues to align its programs and projects with its strategic goals, demonstrating strong implementation of its planned activities.

A comprehensive review of past performance is available in the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPERs), which can be accessed via the City’s website at https://www.cityofhesperia.us/98/Community-Development-Block-Grant- Progra.

As of June 30, 2024, the City achieved the following results:
- Over 18,500 residents in low - and moderate -income areas benefited from public facility and infrastructure improvements.
- More than 200 residents received fair housing services. - The Emergency Housing and Utility Assistance Program (EHUAP) provided rental, mortgage, and utility assistance to 50 unduplicated individuals. - One eligible business was assisted through the Microenterprise Assistance Program (MAP).
- Three eligible businesses received support under the Emergency Business Assistance Program (EBAP).
- The 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 Street Improvement Projects were completed. - Three full-time equivalent jobs were created or retained through EBAP. - Construction of the Peach Avenue Drainage Improvement Project was completed. - The City reallocated 2022–2023 Street Improvement Project funds to support the 2021– 2022 Street Improvement Project.

Summary of Citizen Participation Process and Consultation Process

According to regulations outlined in 24 CFR Part 91, the development of the Consolidated Plan must include meaningful citizen participation and consultation. The City of Hesperia conducted outreach and coordination with a wide range of stakeholders, including:

- The Continuum of Care (CoC) for homelessness
- Public Housing Authorities (PHAs)
- Business and civic leaders
- Agencies and organizations focused on housing, health, social services, education,

4 victim services, and employment

Information gathered from these stakeholders —combined with objective data — contributed to a well-informed planning document that reflects the community’s needs and priorities for the next five years.

In support of this process:

- The City hosted two public meetings in October 2024 and one public hearing in November 2024.
- A Community Needs Survey was available both online and in print from Octob er through November 2024.
- The draft 2025 –2029 Consolidated Plan was made publicly available for a 30 -day review and comment period, allowing residents and regional organizations representing low- and moderate-income populations to provide input. - A final public hearing to adopt the Consolidated Plan is scheduled for April 2025. - All public outreach activities, including the survey, hearings, and comment periods, were publicly noticed to ensure maximum transparency and engagement.

Summary of public comments
TBD
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them TBD
Summary
Analysis of ACS and CHAS data, review of local plans, consultation with the community through the Community Needs Survey, public, stakeholder, and interdepartmental meetings revealed two high priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated $4.8 million in CDBG funds over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan.

The investment of CDBG funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by the goals of the Strategic Plan. Activities must conform to one of the Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action -oriented, measurable goals to receive consideration for CDBG funding.

5 The Process
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies
Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Table 2– Responsible Agencies
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator Hesperia Housing Department

Narrative
The Development Services Department of the City of Hesperia is the lead agency responsible for the administration of the CDBG programs, and projects. Policy and funding approvals are decided by the City Council, which consists of the Mayor, who is elected by districts and four City Council Members from each of four council districts.

Decisions regarding implementation of activities within the Consolidated Plan are based on staff recommendations and input from the residents.

The City contracted with LDM Associates, Inc. to prepare the 2025‐2029 Consolidated Plan.

In the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City and MDG Associates, Inc. implemented a comprehensive citizen participation and consultation process and conducted a needs assessment and market analysis to identify lev els of relative need regarding affordable housing, homelessness, special needs, and community development.

This information was gathered through consultation with stakeholders and community meetings, review of demographic and economic data, and housing market analysis.

In the implementation of the 2025 ‐2029 Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual Action Plans, Housing Department staff shall be responsible for all grants planning, management, and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy.

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Eydee Jimenez, Economic Development Supervisor
9700 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia, CA 92345
[email protected]
(760) 947-1202

6 PR-10 Consultation
As part of the preparation of the Consolidated, Plan the City reached out for consultation to agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the development of affordable housing, creation of job opportunities for low ‐and moderate ‐income residents, and/or provision of services to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons. To facilitate this consultation, the City solicited feedback through the following methods:
- Community Needs Survey (web‐based and paper‐surveys)
- Community and stakeholder meetings
- Public hearings
- Receipt of written or oral comments
The input received from these consultations helped establish and inform the objectives and goals described in the Strategic Plan.

Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).

The City recognizes the importance of careful coordination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of its CDBG allocations. As a result, during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with community organizations and City Departments. Outreach efforts included surveys, public noticing, and invitation to the community and stakeholder meetings. Outreach was made to over 100 organizations and agencies including:
- Nonprofit services providers,
- Affordable and market rate housing developers,
- Housing advocates,
- Public agencies (such as the school district and Public Housing Authority) - Economic development and employment organizations
- Community and neighborhood groups, and Neighboring cities and communities.

The City will continue to foster and strengthen these relationships over the five -year planning period to ensure coordinated implementation of CDBG-funded projects.

7 Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness

The San Bernardino County Continuum of Care (CoC) includes a diverse network of public, private, nonprofit, faith -based, and for -profit entities. These groups collectively address the needs of individuals and families experiencing homelessness by leveraging federal, state, and local resources.

The City of Hesperia actively participates in th e CoC system and supports local services for individuals experiencing homelessness. The nonprofit and faith-based communities are vital partners in these efforts, particularly in serving veterans, survivors of domestic violence, youth, and individuals with disabilities.

Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction’s area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS

The City participates annually in the CoC's Point-in-Time Count and subpopulation survey.

During the preparation of this Plan, the City consulted with the San Bernardino County CoC to gather data on homelessness and assess the needs of the local unhoused population. This outreach included homeless service providers who are active members of the CoC.

The City aligns its priorities with the CoC to address the community's needs effectively, especially in areas such as ESG fund allocati on, HMIS administration, and performance evaluation.

8 Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities
Table 3– Agencies, groups, organizations who participated

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

1 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Adelanto
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

2 Agency/ Group/ Organization Town of Apple Valley
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

3 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Fontana City Manager’s Office Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

4 Agency/ Group/ Organization Fontana City Council
Type Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Anti-Poverty Strategy

9 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

5 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Fontana Police Department Type Local Government; Emergency Management Agency;
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homeless Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

6 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Hesperia City Manager's Office Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

8 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Rancho Cucamonga
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

9 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Rialto Community Services Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy

10 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

10 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of San Bernardino
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

11 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Upland
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

12 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Victorville
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

COUNTY GOVERNMENT

13 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Department of Behavioral Health, Homeless Services
Type
Local Government; Publicly Funded Institution; Health
Agency; Services-Homeless; Local Government;
Continuum of Care

11 What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

14 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors District 2 Type Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

15 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office, Victim Services
Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Local
Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

16 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Economic Development Agency Type Local Government; Regional Organization; Planning
Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development; Anti-Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

17 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Office of Homeless Services Type Continuum of Care; Services-Homeless; Regional
Organization; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors

12 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

18 Agency/ Group/ Organization Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino Type PHA; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Public Housing Needs; Homelessness Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

19 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Library, Adult Literacy Services Type Services-Education; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Housing Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

20 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Preschool Services Department Type Services-Children; Services-Education; Local
Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

21 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools Type
Services-Education; Services-Children; Services-
Homeless; Publicly Funded Institution; Local
Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Other-Non-Housing Community Development;
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –Families
with Children, Unaccompanied Minors
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

13 22
Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Transitional Assistance Department
Type Child Welfare Agency; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

23 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Veterans Affairs Type Services-Homeless Veterans; Services-Elderly; Services- Health; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

24 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Workforce Investment Board Type Services – Employment; Regional Organization;
Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development; Anti-Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

HOMELESSNESS
Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Homeless Provider Network

25 Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

26 Agency/ Group/ Organization A Place Along the Way
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty

14 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

27 Agency/ Group/ Organization Caring by Nature
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

28 Agency/ Group/ Organization Community Action Partnership of San Bernardino Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

29 Agency/ Group/ Organization Feed My Sheep in the High Desert Type Services-Homeless; Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs;
Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

30 Agency/ Group/ Organization Frazee Community Center
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

31 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Homeless Services, Inc.

Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty

15 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

32 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Second Chance Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

33 Agency/ Group/ Organization Holy Family Food Bank
Type Services-Homeless; Other
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

34 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Community Food Bank Type Services-Homeless; Other
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

35 Agency/ Group/ Organization Inland Valley Hope Partners Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

36 Agency/ Group/ Organization Orenda Foundation
Type Service-Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty

16 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

37 Agency/ Group/ Organization Reach-Out
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy, Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

38 Agency/ Group/ Organization St. Joseph Church, His hands Ministry Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy, Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

39 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Interagency Council on Homelessness
Type Service-Homeless; Regional Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors; Anti-Poverty
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

40 Agency/ Group/ Organization Water of Life Church
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
41 Agency/ Group/ Organization Family Assistance Program

17 Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services- Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homeless Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

42 Agency/ Group/ Organization Pacific Lifeline
Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-
Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development; Housing
Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

43 Agency/ Group/ Organization Project Sister Family Services Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-
Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development; Homelessness Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

44 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Domestic Violence, Inc.

Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-
Homeless; Services-Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homeless Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

45 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Family Resource Center Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-
Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development

18 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

ELDERLY & DISABLED
Agency/ Group/ Organization Council on Aging-Southern California

46 Type Services – Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

47 Agency/ Group/ Organization George M. Gibson Senior Center Type Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

48 Agency/ Group/ Organization Oldtimers Foundation
Type Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

49 Agency/ Group/ Organization Rock'n Our Disabilities
Type Services-Disability
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Non-Housing Community
Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.
50 Agency/ Group/ Organization Rolling Start Inc.

Type Services-Disability

19 What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

CHILDREN
Agency/ Group/ Organization Apple Valley Police Activities League (AVPAL)

51 Type Service-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

52 Agency/ Group/ Organization Assistance League of Victor Valley Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

53 Agency/ Group/ Organization Boys & Girls Club of Fontana Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

54 Agency/ Group/ Organization Big Brothers/Big Sisters Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.
55 Agency/ Group/ Organization Cedar House Life Change Center

20 Type Foster Care Agency/Facility, Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

56 Agency/ Group/ Organization Child Advocates of San Bernardino (CASAC) Type Foster Care Agency/Facility; Child Welfare Agency; Services-Children; Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

57 Agency/ Group/ Organization Child Care Resource Center Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

58 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Community Foundation – Hesperia Police Activities League (HPAL)
Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

59 Agency/ Group/ Organization Kid-2-Kid Closet
Type Services – Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development

21 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

60 Agency/ Group/ Organization Millionaire Mind Kids
Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Other-Non-Housing Community Development Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

EDUCATION
Agency/ Group/ Organization Chaffey College, Fontana Campus

61 Type Services-Education; Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-
Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

62 Agency/ Group/ Organization Fontana Unified School District Type Services-Children; Publicly Funded Institution; Services- Education; Services-Homelessness
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homelessness Strategy;
Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-Housing Community
Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

63 Agency/ Group/ Organization Rancho Cucamonga Unified School District Type Services-Education; Services-Children; Services-
Homeless; Publicly Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homelessness Strategy;
Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-Housing Community
Development

22 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

64 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley College
Type Services-Education; Publicly Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-
Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

65 Agency/ Group/ Organization Upland Public Library
Type Services-Education
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

66 Agency/ Group/ Organization Upland Unified School District Type Services-Education; Services-Children; Services-
Homeless; Publicly Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homelessness Strategy;
Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-Housing Community
Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

FAIR HOUSING

67 Agency/ Group/ Organization Inland Fair Housing & Mediation Board (IFHMB) Type Services-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.
68 Agency/ Group/ Organization Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino

23 Type Services-Fair Housing; Civic Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Analysis; Homelessness Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

HOUSING
Agency/ Group/ Organization Building Industry Association

69 Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

70 Agency/ Group/ Organization California Apartment Association of Inland Empire Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

71 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Fontana Housing Authority Type Housing; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

72 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Hesperia Housing Authority Type Housing; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

24 73
Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Upland Housing Authority Type Housing; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

74 Agency/ Group/ Organization Con Am
Type Service-Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

75 Agency/ Group/ Organization GRID Alternatives
Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

76 Agency/ Group/ Organization Jamboree Housing
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

77 Agency/ Group/ Organization National Community Renaissance Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

25 78
Agency/ Group/ Organization Palm Communities
Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

79 Agency/ Group/ Organization Quality Management Group Type Services-Housing; Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

80 Agency/ Group/ Organization RPM Company
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

81 Agency/ Group/ Organization RSG
Type Services-Housing; Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment; Homelessness Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

82 Agency/ Group/ Organization Siena Apartments
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

26 83
Agency/ Group/ Organization State of California Department of Housing and Community Development
Type State Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

84 Agency/ Group/ Organization Sunrise Terrace I & II
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

85 Agency/ Group/ Organization VPM Management
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

86 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Community Services Council Type Services-Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

HEALTH
Agency/ Group/ Organization Behavioral Awareness
87 Type Health Agency; Services-Children;
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Housing Special Needs

27 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

88 Agency/ Group/ Organization Children's Dental Health Clinic Type Services-Health; Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

89 Agency/ Group/ Organization The Children’s Clinic
Type Services-Health, Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

90 Agency/ Group/ Organization Kaiser Permanente
Type Services-Health; Business Leader; Civic Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

91 Agency/ Group/ Organization Mental Health America of Los Angeles Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

92 Agency/ Group/ Organization Pueblo Y Salud
Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Other-Non-Housing Community Development

28 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

93 Agency/ Group/ Organization The Richstone Family Center Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

94 Agency/ Group/ Organization Save the Brave US
Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

BROADBAND
Agency/ Group/ Organization Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium

95 Type Broadband Advocated
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

96 Agency/ Group/ Organization CA Emerging Technology Fund (CETF) Type Broadband Advocate
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.
97 Agency/ Group/ Organization Frontier
Type Broadband ISP

29 What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

98 Agency/ Group/ Organization HighSpeedInternet.com
Type Broadband ISP
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

99 Agency/ Group/ Organization Spectrum Internet Provider Type Broadband ISP
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

REGIONAL PLANNING
Agency/ Group/ Organization Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP)

100
Type Regional Organization; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

101
Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino Associated of Government (SANBAG) Type Regional Organization; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Analysis; Homelessness Strategy
Non-Homeless Needs Assessment; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

30 102
Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Transit Authority Type Planning Organization; Regional Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

CIVIC & BUSINESS LEADERS

103
Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Fontana Chamber of Commerce Type Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

104
Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Hesperia Chamber of Commerce Type Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

105
Agency/ Group/ Organization Inland Empire SBDC
Type Services-Employment; Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

106
Agency/ Group/ Organization Moses House Ministries
Type Civic Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development

31 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

107
Agency/ Group/ Organization National Council of Negro Women, Bethune Center Type Services-Employment
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development, Business Leader How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

108
Agency/ Group/ Organization Shear Realty
Type Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

109
Agency/ Group/ Organization Today's Woman Foundation
Type Civic Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

110
Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Upland Chamber of Commerce Type Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

111
Agency/ Group/ Organization Wal Mart
Type Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development

32 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Agency/ Group/ Organization California Department of Fish and Wildlife

112
Type Public Land Agency; State Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

113
Agency/ Group/ Organization California Desert District Office, US Department of the Interior: Bureau of Land Management
Type Public Land Agency; Federal Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

114
Agency/ Group/ Organization Federal Emergency Management Agency Type Floodplain Management Agency; Emergency
Management Agency; Federal Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment; Non-Housing Community
Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?

To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

115
Agency/ Group/ Organization Foothill AIDS Project
Type Service-HIV/AIDS; Services-Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment; Non-Homeless Needs

33 How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

116
Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Animal Coalition Type Civic Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Housing Community Development; Non-Homeless
Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

117
Agency/ Group/ Organization HUD Local Field Office
Type Federal Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy;
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development;
Lead-Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

118
Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority Type Water District/ Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Analysis; Non-Housing Community
Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and
what are the anticipated
outcomes of the consultation or
areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the Consolidated
Plan process included consultation and engagement
with City residents, service providers, and selected
departments through surveys, meetings, and email.

Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City maintains a comprehensive list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders and invited representatives from each entity to participate in the planning process at multiple points in the planning process. If an agency did not attend meetings or participate in surveys, it was done so by the agency’s choice.

34 Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Table 4– Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan?
Continuum of
Care
Human Services
Office of Homeless
Services
The Strategic Plan goal to provide homeless
services is consistent with the County of San
Bernardino Homelessness Action Plan.
2021-2029
Housing Element City of Hesperia The Strategic Plan is in alignment with the Housing of the City’s General Plan.

Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l))
City of Hesperia departments, adjacent units of government, the CoC, and HACSB were consulted with on the development and implementation of the Consolidated Plan.

35 PR-15 Citizen Participation
Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation In preparation for the Consolidated Plan, the City followed the established processes of the Citizen Participation Plan to ensure broad community engagement. These activities were coordinated and implemented by the Housing Department. The City sought input from its residents and stakeholder by circulating surveys about community needs. The surveys were available online and in hardcopy format. The resident survey was available in English and Spanish; the Stakeholder survey was available in English. The City received a total of 207 responses from residents and 24 from stakeholders. The survey results and the survey forms are included in Appendix B.

In accordance with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan, residents and stakeholders were able to participate in the development of the 2025 ‐2029 Consolidated Plan through public hearings, meetings, and the 30-day review and comment period. The City engaged residents and organizations through surveys and publicly noticed hearings held at the beginning of the Consolidated Planning process. These activities, conducted in fall 2024, were intended to gather input on the City's housing and community development needs. The first public hearing was held on November 19, 2024 at 6:30 PM and the public meetings were held on October 28 at 5:00 PM at City Hall. A public hearing to adopt the Consolidated Plan and first year Annual Action Plan is scheduled for April 15, 2025, at 6:30 PM, at City Hall.

In accordance with the City’s Citizen P articipation Plan, all public notices for public hearings and the 30 -day comment period were published in a medium of general circulation in the City. Additionally, the City used social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram to advertise the opport unities to participate. At each step in the process, the City was careful to ensure that low ‐ and moderate‐income residents, members of minority groups, agencies involved in the provision of services to these populations, and others who are directly impacted by the programs and activities supported by the Consolidated Plan programs had the opportunity to be actively involved.

36 Table 5 - Citizen Participation Outreach
Outreach Summary
Mode Additional
Modes Target Content/ Attendance Comments
Comments
not
accepted
Newspaper
Ad
City
website;
Social
Media;
Flyers
English and
Spanish
Published October 13, 2024. Public Meeting,
October 28, 2024, 10:00 AM and 5:00 PM at the
Hesperia Library Community Room, and November
5, 2024 Public Hearing at City Hall; Community
Needs Survey.

N/A N/A
Newspaper
Ad
City
website;
Social
Media;
Flyers
English and
Spanish
Published November 3, 2024. Rescheduled Public
Hearing, from November 5, to November 19, 2024,
6:30 PM, City Hall; Community Needs Survey.

N/A N/A
Public
Meetings
English and
Spanish
Broad Community
Public Meetings, October 29, 2024, 10:00 AM and
5:00 PM, at the Hesperia Library Community Room.

See Appendix B.

All comments
were
accepted
N/A
Public
Hearing
English and
Spanish
Broad Community
Public Hearing, November 19, 2024, 6:30 PM, City
Hall. See Appendix B.

All comments
were
accepted
N/A
Community
Needs
Survey
English and
Spanish
Broad Community
See Appendix B All comments
were
accepted
N/A
Newspaper
Ad
City
website
English and
Spanish
Substantially complete Draft 2025-2029
Consolidated Plan and 2025-2026 Annual Action
Plan 30-day review period from March 17 to April
15, 2025 and public hearing on April 15, 2025, 6:30
PM, at City Hall.

N/A N/A
30-Day
Review
Broad Community Made available on website and in hard copy from March 17 to April 15, 2025

TBD TBD
Public
Hearing
English and
Spanish
Broad Community
Public hearing of Draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan
and 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan on April 15, 2025,
6:30 PM, at City Hall.

TBD TBD

37 Needs Assessment
NA-05 Overview
Needs Assessment Overview

The Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment examines housing, homelessness, non - homeless special needs, and non-housing community development needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income, tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income, disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups, and public housing needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population in San Bernardino County to inform the City’s strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non -homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of subpopulations who are not homeless and due to various reasons need services. This includes people who are elderly, frail and elderly, have severe mental illness, developmental and/ or physical disability, alcohol or other drug addictions, HIV/AIDS, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and who has suffered human trafficking and domestic violence. The non-housing community development needs assessment section discusses the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements and public services to benefit low - and moderate - income residents.

Methodology
To assess community needs, the City examined data, held community meetings, conducted a survey of residents and local stakeholders, and consulted with experts and local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on the sources of data which follow:
- American Community Survey (ACS) 2020 5-year estimates - Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) 2016-2020 - 2023 & 2024 Point-In-Time Homeless Count
The 2020 ACS and CHAS 5 -year estimates were the most recent available complete datasets available from both sources.

Consolidated Plan Survey for Residents and Stakeholders Hesperia residents and stakeholders had the opportunity to respond to the Community Needs survey to rate the level of need for public facilities, infrastructure, public and neighborhood services, and housing facilities and services. The survey provided insight into internet access and disaster preparedness. Additionally, organizations that work with residents of Hesperia with low - and moderate -incomes, special needs, and those experiencing or at-risk or experiencing homelessness were given the opportunity to share their thoughts on the most effective community development project from the last

38 Consolidated Planning cycle and high priorities in housing, community, or economic development over the next five years. The tabulation of survey results from 207 residents and 24 organizations who responded to the survey are integrated throughout the Needs Assessment (NA) and Market Analysis (MA) sections of Consolidated Plan.

39 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment
Summary of Housing Needs
According to the Demographics table, the city of Hesperia’s population rose by 11 percent from 90,173 to 99,818 from 2010 to 2020. During this time, the number of households rose by nine percent from 24,889 to 27,207 and the median household income increased 12 percent from $48,386 to $54,149.

The Households graph shows how many Hesperia households are in each income category. The income levels correspond with HUD area median income (AMI) definitions.

Over half of households in Hesperia have incomes at or below 80 percent of AMI.

Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Figure 1 - Households

Small family households consist of two -to-four family members, while large family households have five or more persons. The most common household type in Hesperia is small family households, representing 45 percent of all households in the City.

In this section there are six tables of data which reference housing problems. Housing problems are defined by HUD as follows:

1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.

2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.

3. Overcrowding / severe overcrowding: A household is overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-

40 rooms. A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.

4. Cost burden / severe cost burden: A cost burdened household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. A severely cost burdened household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. Renter’s housing costs include rent paid by t he tenant plus utilities. Owner’s housing costs include mortgage, taxes, insurance, and utilities.

The Housing Problems tables make clear housing cost burden greater than 30 percent is the most common housing problem across renter and owner households; and renter households are most impacted by severe housing problems. About 60 percent of the 15,500 households earning less than at most 80 percent AMI experience a housing cost burden over 30 percent of income. Approximately 64 percent of the 5,975 households earning less than 80 percent AMI with one or more severe housing problem are renters.

Demographics Base Year: 2010 Most Recent Year: 2020 % Change Population* 90,173 99,818 10.7%
Households** 24,889 27,207 9.3%
Median Income** $48,386 $54,149 11.9%
Data Source: *2010 & 2020 Decennial Census, **2010 and 2020 5-Year ACS Estimates Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics

0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-100%
AMI
>100%
AMI
Total Households 5,120 4,570 5,810 2,900 8,805
Small Family Households 1,760 1,860 2,825 1,075 4,825
Large Family Households 900 855 1,585 1,040 1,795
Household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age 1,420 1,410 1,535 450 1,895
Household contains at least one-
person age 75 or older 415 560 690 360 565
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or younger 950 1,280 1,545 1,270 1,305 Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Table 7 - Number of Households Table

41 Housing Needs Summary Tables

Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing - Lacking
complete
plumbing or
kitchen facilities

70 25

0 40

135

35 4

0 55

94 Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51
people per room
(and complete
kitchen and
plumbing)

10 75

195

25 305

10 15

50 20

95 Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per room
(and none of the
above problems)

170

215

80 70

535

45 65

190

130

430
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50% of
income (and
none of the
above problems)

2,230

715

45 0

2,990

845

630

255

40 1,770
Housing cost
burden greater
than 30% of
income (and
none of the
above problems)

290

1,025

890

40 2,245

510

750

990

285

2,535
Zero/negative
Income (and
none of the
above problems)

55 0

0 0

55 180

0 0

0 180
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Table 8 - Housing Problem 1 (Households with one of the listed needs)

42 Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI

Total
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI

Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having 1 or more of
four housing
problems
2,485 1,025 320 140 3,970 935 715 495 240 2,385
Having none of four
housing problems 750 1,170 1,805 710 4,435 950 1,660 3,195 1,815 7,620 Household has
negative income, but
none of the other
housing problems

55 0

0 0

55 180

0 0

0 180
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Table 9 - Housing Problem 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden)

Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI

Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI

Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 105 510 580 1,195 105 290 595 990
Large Related 90 290 195 575 0 105 255 360
Elderly 95 190 95 380 410 370 104 884
Other 15 215 55 285 0 20 40 60
Total need by
income 305 1,205 925 2,435 515 785 994 2,294
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Table 10 - Housing Problem 3 (Cost Burden 30-50%)

43 Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI

Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI

Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 1,105 515 0 1,620 285 215 175 675
Large Related 570 60 4 634 160 70 30 260
Elderly 475 25 0 500 300 275 25 600
Other 305 115 35 455 155 85 25 265
Total need by
income 2,455 715 39 3,209 900 645 255 1,800
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Table 11 - Housing Problem 3 (Cost Burden > 50%)

Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI

Total
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI

Total

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single family households 180 230 120 75 605 40 80 135 90 345 Multiple, unrelated family
households 0 55 95 40 190 15 0 100 55 170
Other, non-family
households 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Total need by income 180 285 275 115 855 55 80 235 145 515 Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Table 12 - Housing Problem 4 (Crowding Information – More than one person per room)

Renter Owner

0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
Households with
children 6 years of
age or younger
present

800

810

755

2,365

150

470

790

1,410
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Table 13 - Households with children under the age of 6

Source: 2016-2020 CHAS Data
44 Map 1 - Households with Extremely Low-Income and Severe Cost Burden

Source: 2016-2020 CHAS Data
45 Map 2 - Households with Low-income and Severe Cost Burden

Source: 2016-2020 CHAS Data
46 Map 3 - Households with Moderate-Income and Severe Cost Burden

47 Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.

Single person elderly or low -income households can be presumed to need assistance.

According to the 2016 -2020 ACS data approximately eight percent householders in Hesperia are over 65 years of age and living alone. CHAS 2016 -2020 estimates show 385 single householders earn less than at most 80 percent AMI and spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs, while 720 spend more than 50 percent of AMI on housing costs. Finally, 39 percent of single households are renters.

Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.

Domestic and dating violence, assault, and stalking are not always reported. According to the 2022 National Crime Victimization Survey, only 53 percent of all domestic violence events and 21 percent of rapes/ sexual assaults were reported to the police. The State of California Department of Justice maintains statistics on domestic violence calls to local law enforc ement statewide by jurisdiction ( openjustice.doj.ca.gov). In 2022, 366 calls related to domestic violence were made from Hesperia. Of these incidents:
142 involved a weapon,
- 10 involved a firearm,
- 10 involved a knife or cutting instruments,
- 15 involved other dangerous weapons, and
- 107 involved personal weapons (i.e., feet or hands).

There were at least 366 times during 2022 when a household needed some type of domestic violence services. In households where physical violence occurred, it is possible that at least one member of the household needed to relocate to escape recurring violence. These households may include children. Victims of domestic violence suffer in many ways including economically, which impacts access to safe and affordable permanent housing.

There is a need for emergency shelter and affordable permanent housing.

What are the most common housing problems?

The most common housing problem in the City is housing cost burden greater than 30 percent. Table 3 accounts for the number of households with one of four housing problems.

Those problems are defined in the introduction to this section. The data shows 60 percent of households earning less than at most 80 percent AMI experience this housing problem.

The Most Prevalent Housing Problems graph illustrates the degree to which housing cost burden is experienced in Hesperia.

48 Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Figure 2 - Most Prevalent Housing Problems

The second most common housing problems are overcrowding and severe overcrowding, which affects 1,120 households with incomes up to and including 80 percent AMI. Within this income range renter households account for 67 percent of households living in overcrowded or severely overcrowded conditions.

Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?

Renter households are most impacted by severe housing problems. Small related and elderly households with low and moderate incomes are most impacted by housing cost burden and single-family renter households are most impacted by overcrowding and severe overcrowding. Housing Problem three acc ounts for the number of households spending 30 to 50 percent (see Table 5) and over 50 percent (see Table 6) of their income on housing. Approximately 14 percent of households earning less than at most 80 percent AMI (2,185 households) are small, related households which carry a housing cost burden of 30 to 50 percent of their income, while eight percent (1,264 households) of similarly positioned households are elderly. Almost 15 percent of households (2,295 households) with incomes at or below 80 percent AMI are small, related households and seven percent are elderly households (1,100 households) and carry a severe cost burden of over 50 percent of their income. Single -family renter households are most impacted by overcrowding, representing three percent o f households (530 households) earning less than at most 80 percent AMI.

49 Describe the characteristics and needs of low -income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)).

Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance.

Extremely low (0 -30 percent AMI) and low -income (30 -50% AMI) households are presumed to be unstably housed, meaning they are at -risk of falling into homelessness.

Those with one or more housing problems at this income level are highly sensitive to adverse events. The greatest concentrations of unstably housed households are among small family households, small, related renter households with a housing cost burden greater than 30 percent of their income, and renter households with at least one severe housing problem.

There are 9,690 households in Hesperia earning at most 50 percent of AMI, representing 36 percent of all households. While Small Related households are most impacted by housing cost burden the graphs below show how significantly large, related renter, elderly owner households are impacted by housing cost burden as well. A renter household in this income range are about two times more likely to experience a housing cost burden of greater than 50 percent of their income as an owner household. Furthermore, 410 single family renter households with incomes at or below 50 percent of AMI are living in overcrowded conditions and could be presumed unstably housed.

Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Figure 3 - Households With >30-50% Cost Burden & >50% Cost Burden

As described in the Market Analysis, rental housing costs have risen steadily over the past ten years – creating more pressure on extremely low-income households. The ACS data shows the median contract rent in Hesperia increased 18 percent from 2010 to 2020. As

50 rental prices continue to rise throughout San Bernardino County, the pressure on extremely low-income households will continue to increase.

Rapid rehousing programs may help homeless individuals and families but, unless a housing unit is within a subsidized affordable housing development, formerly homeless families and individuals receiving rapid rehousing assistance face considerable uncertainty with respect to their monthly housing costs and ability to remain stably housed at the end of the assistance contract. Near the termination of assistance, finding replacement housing is difficult for the same reasons it was difficult before becoming homeless: high housing cost and the possibility of an eviction record.

If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at -risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates.

The assessment of at -risk populations described in the foregoing paragraphs in this Consolidated Plan is based on ACS and CHAS data using HUD definitions for household types and housing problems, supplemented by available local data for certain groups specified by HUD, such as households with children and victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.

Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness.

There are 2,955 renter households who earn at most 50 percent of AMI and are severely cost burdened, according to the CHAS data (see Table 6). Of these households:
- 1,620 are small, related households with four or fewer members, - 630 are large, related households with five or more members, - 500 are elderly households with one or more members over the age of 62, and - 420 are other households.

These extremely low- and low-income households are considered the most at- risk of becoming homeless.

Discussion

According to the housing problem tables above, of households with incomes at or below 50 percent of AMI 44 percent are cost burdened renters, and three percent are overcrowded and severely overcrowded renters. Of households with incomes at or below 30 percent of AMI 49 percent are severely cost burdened renters and four percent are overcrowded and severely overcrowded renters. These households are presumed to be most at -risk of becoming homeless.

51 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems Introduction

Sections NA-15, NA-20, and NA-25 of the Needs Assessment examine housing problems experienced by racial or ethnic groups and identifies when a need is experienced at a disproportionately greater frequency. A disproportionately greater need exists when members of a group in an income range experience housing problems at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than all households within that income level. For example, when evaluating households with incomes less than 30 percent of AMI, if 50 percent of the households experience a housing problem, but 60 percent or more of a group experience housing problems, that group has a disproportionately greater need. Please note as part of the CHAS data set HUD did not calculate households with no/negative income, but one or more of the other housing problems by race or ethnicity for the 2016-2020 period.

Housing problems and severe housing problems analyzed in sections NA-15 and NA-20 are based on the definitions that follow:

- Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
- Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
- Overcrowding: Household with more than 1.01 people per room. - Cost burden: Household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, this includes rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, this includes mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities. -
According to the 2016-2020 ACS, most residents identify ethnically as Hispanic or Latino and most residents identify racially, excluding Hispanic ethnicity, as White, followed by Black or African American, Asian, Two or more races, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and Some other race.

Data Source: 2016-2020ACS
Figure 4 - Race Alone

52 Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative income, but
none of the other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 4,220 900 0
White 1,215 500 0
Black /African American 420 4 0
Asian 85 85 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 10 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 2,485 255 0
Data Source: 2016-2020
Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI

Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative income, but
none of the other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,515 1,055 0
White 1,070 570 0
Black /African American 180 15 0
Asian 130 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 8 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 25 0
Hispanic 2,035 425 0
Data Source: 2016-2020
Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI