City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 12, 2025
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Nathan R. Freeman, Director of Development Services BY: Ryan Leonard, Principal Planner
Edgar Gonzalez, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Development Code Amendment DCA2 4-00003 and Specific Plan Amendment SPLA24-00005; Applicant: City of Hesperia; Area Affected: City-wide
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC -2025-07, recommending that the City Council introduce and place on first reading an ordinance approving Development Code Amendment DCA24-00003 and Specific Plan Amendment SPLA24-00005 to prohibit the establishment of new, or the expansion of existing, outdoor pallet yards and indoor pallet manufacturing facilities.
BACKGROUND
On August 20, 2024, the City Council recognized the need for regulations on pallet yard facilities due to their potential negative impacts. Consequ ently, the Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 2024-10, implementing a 45-day moratorium on the establishment or expansion of pallet yard facilities within the City (Attachment 1).
On September 17, 2024, the City Council extended the moratorium for ten months and fifteen days, bringing the total duration to one year (Attachment 2).
The purpose of the moratorium was to allow staff time to analyze the potential issues associated with pallet yard facilities and propose regulations to mitigate their impact on the community. The primary concerns related to pallet yards include:
Fire Risk: Outdoor pallet storage yards pose a significant fire hazard due to the accumulation of large quantities of highly combustible wood. In recent years, multiple fires at outdoor pallet yards in nearby cities have resulted in millions of dollars in damages. Stacking Hazards: Pallet yards often stack wooden pallets at considerable heights. Without adequate regulation of stacking height, spacing, and volume, improperly stored pallets can pose a falling hazard, endangering employees, visitors, and nearby properties. Improper stacking may also increase fire risk.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Existing Regulations: Under the Hesperia Municipal Code (Section 16.16.320), outdoor pallet yards and indoor pallet manufacturing facilities are currently permitted in the Limited Manufacturing (I1) and General Manufacturing (I2) zones. These facilities are classified as general manufacturing uses and are subject to development standards regulating outdoor storage Att achment 6
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
DCA24-00003 and SPLA24-00005
June 12, 2025
(for outdoor pallet yards only). However, there are no specific regulations tailored to outdoor or indoor pallet facilities.
Similarly, the Main Street and Freeway Co rridor Specific Plan permits these uses in the Commercial Industrial Business Park (CIBP) and General Industrial (GI) zones. While they are classified as general manufacturing uses, the Specific Plan also lacks explicit regulations for pallet facilities.
Proposed Regulations: As noted, there are no specific development standards directly regulating outdoor pallet yards or indoor pallet manufacturing facilities. The proposed Development Code Amendment seeks to prohibit the establishment, expansion, and operation of these facilities in all industrial zoning designations within the City.
These uses present significant fire hazards due to the high combustibility of stacked wooden pallets. The excessive vertical stacking of pallets also creates safety risks and can hinder emergency access. In addition to fire and safety concerns, pallet facilities often generate excessive noise, attract rodents, create visual blight, and contribute to environmental issues, including improper material storage and potential stormwater runoff contamination.
Pallet facilities have a well-documented history of contributing to severe fires, many of which have resulted in extensive property damage, environmental degradation, and public safety risks.
Numerous incidents, both locally and nationally, have involved fires burning for hours or days, demonstrating how quickly stacked pallets can ignite and how intensely they burn. Their high combustibility, coupled with inadequate emergency access, often results in uncontrollable fires that threaten surrounding businesses, residential neighborhoods, and critical infrastructure.
Facilities lacking proper oversight or maintenance often contribute to urban decline by facilitating illegal dumping and exposing surrounding communities to airborne he alth hazards. These negative impacts frequently lead to increased costs for cities, which must allocate resources to code enforcement, fire response, and environmental cleanup. Additionally, pallet facilities typically provide minimal economic return, representing an inefficient use of industrial space, especially in communities focused on sustainable growth, workforce development, and long -term economic resilience.
The proposed prohibition aims to preserve the quality of life in residential, commercial, a nd industrial zones, reduce fire risk to adjacent properties, and promote more compatible and sustainable land uses.
Environmental: Approval of the Development Code Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no significant effect on the environment. The proposed Development Code Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment are also exempt under Section
16.12.415(B)(10) of the City’s CEQA Guidelines, as they do not propose to increase the density or intensity allowed by the General Plan.
Conclusion: The proposed ordinance prohibits new and expanded outdoor pallet yards and indoor pallet manufacturing facilities. This action is intended to enhance public safety and promote responsible development that balances economic activity with community well-being.
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
DCA24-00003 and SPLA24-00005
June 12, 2025
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Future Development: Facilitate balanced growth to ensure cohesive community development and pursue economic development.
FISCAL IMPACT
There are no identified fiscal impacts associated with this action.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. The Planning Commission may provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Ordinance 2024-10 (45-day Moratorium)
2. Ordinance 2024-11 (10 months & 15-day Extension to Moratorium)
3. Exhibit A – Amended language for DCA & SPLA
4. Resolution No. PC-2025-07