HESPERIA CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HOUSING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
WATER DISTRICT
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Closed Session - 5:00 PM
Regular Meeting - 6:30 PM
City Council Chambers
9700 Seventh Ave., Hesperia CA, 92345
City Clerk's Office: (760) 947-1007
City Council Members
Brigit Bennington, Mayor
Josh Pullen, Mayor Pro Tem
Cameron Gregg, Council Member
Allison Lee, Council Member
Chris Ochoa, Council Member
Rachel Molina, City Manager
Pam K. Lee, City Attorney
HESPERIA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT - SPECIAL MEETING
NOTE: In compliance with the Americans with Disability Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (760) 947-1007 or (760) 947-1026. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
To leave a Public Comment by phone, call and leave a recorded message at (760) 947-1026 up to 5:30 pm on the day of the scheduled meeting. City Council meetings may be viewed live or after the event on the City’s website at www.hesperiaca.gov.
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
April 21, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
HESPERIA CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT
HESPERIA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT - SPECIAL MEETING
9700 7th Avenue, Council Chambers, Hesperia, CA 92345
As a courtesy, please silence your cell phones and other electronic devices while the meeting is in session. Thank you.
Prior to action of the Council, any member of the audience will have the opportunity to address the legislative body on any item listed on the agenda, including those on the Consent Calendar.
Individuals wishing to speak during General Public Comments or on a particular numbered item must submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk with the agenda item noted. Speaker slips should be turned in prior to the public comment portion of the agenda or before an agenda item is discussed. Comments will be limited to three minutes for General Public Comments, Consent Calendar items and New Business items. Comments are limited to five minutes for Public Hearing items.
In compliance with the Brown Act, the City Council may not discuss or take action on non-agenda items or engage in question and answer sessions with the public. The City Council may ask brief questions for clarification; provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information and direct staff to add an item to a subsequent meeting.
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
Roll Call
Mayor Brigit Bennington
Mayor Pro Tem Josh Pullen
Council Member Cameron Gregg
Council Member Allison Lee
Council Member Chris Ochoa
Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)1
1. Sully-Miller Contracting, et al. v. City of Hesperia et al., SBSC Case No.
CIVSB2410614
Conference with Real Property Negotiators – Property Negotiations Government Code Section – 54956.8
1. Negotiating Parties: Hesperia Lake Park and City of Hesperia Location: APN: 0398-031-34
Under Negotiation: Price and terms
Conference with Labor Negotiator
Government Code Section 54957.6
1. Negotiations between the City of Hesperia and the Teamsters Local 1932
April 21, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda
with the City's Negotiator. (Staff person: Casey Brooksher, Assistant City Manager) CALL TO ORDER - 6:30 PM
A. Invocation
B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
C. Roll Call
Mayor Brigit Bennington
Mayor Pro Tem Josh Pullen
Council Member Cameron Gregg
Council Member Allison Lee
Council Member Chris Ochoa
D. Agenda Revisions and Announcements by City Clerk
E. Closed Session Reports by City Attorney
ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Recognition to resident Paul Orloski, Neighborhood Pride Enhancement Program Honoree.
2. Presentation of Recognition to VVWRA for the 2025/2026 Tertiary Plant of the Year awarded by the California Water Environment Association.
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS (For items and matters not listed on the agenda) Individuals wishing to speak during General Public Comments or on a particular numbered item are requested to submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk with the agenda item noted. Speaker slips should be turned in prior to the public comment portion of the joint agenda or before an agenda item is discussed. Comments will be limited to three minutes for General Public Comments, Consent Calendar items and New Business items. Comments are limited to five minutes for Public Hearing items.
In compliance with the Brown Act, the City Council may not discuss or take action on non-agenda items or engage in question and answer sessions with the public. The City Council may ask brief questions for clarification; provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information and direct staff to add an item to a subsequent meeting.
JOINT CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Consideration of the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesday, April 7, 2026.
Recommended Action:
It is
recommended that the City Council approve the Draft Minutes from the Regular meeting held Tuesday, April 7, 2026.
April 21, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda
Staff Person: Assistant City Clerk Jessica Giber
Draft CC Min 2026-04-07Attachments:
2. Warrant Run Report (City- Successor Agency- Housing Authority- Community Development Commission- Water)
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.
Staff Person: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
SR Warrant Run 4-21-2026
Attachment 1 - Warrant Run
Attachments:
3. Treasurer’s Cash Report for the unaudited period ended February 28, 2026.
Recommended Action:
It
is recommended that the Council/Board accept the Treasurer’s Cash Report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.
Staff Person: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
SR Treasurer's Report 4-21-2026
Attachment 1 - Treasurer's Report
Attachments:
4. Audited Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 Recommended Action:
It
is recommended that the City Council, Community Development Commission, Hesperia Housing Authority Board, Hesperia Water District Board, and Hesperia Fire Protection District Board receive and file the audited Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025.
Staff Person: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
SR Audited Financial Statements 4-21-2026Attachments:
5. Contract Amendment for Printing Services
Recommended Action:
It
is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District authorize the City Manager to approve an amendment of $80,000
April 21, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda
to the existing contract with Wirz and Company Printing, Inc., for a revised not-to-exceed amount of $160,000 and approve a one-year contract extension for printing services.
Staff Person: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
SR Wirz and Company Printing, Inc Contract Amendment 4-21-2026Attachments:
6. Award Construction Contract for FY 2024-25 CDBG Street Improvements, Construction Order No. 7175
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Award a construction contract for the FY 2024-25 CDBG Street Improvements, Construction Order (C.O.) No. 7175 project to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder, Sully-Miller Contracting Company for the bid amount of $339,900; approve an additional 10% contingency in the amount of $33,990, for a not-to-exceed total construction contract amount of $373,890; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR FY 24-25 CDBG Street Improvements Contract Award 4-21-2026Attachments:
7. Acceptance of 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 and No. 2, and Sewer Repairs
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District:
1. Accept the completed 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 and No. 2, and Sewer Repairs;
2. Authorize staff to record a Notice of Completion for each project; and
3. Authorize the release of all withheld retention amounts no sooner than (30) calendar days following the date of recordation.
Staff Person: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez SR December Weather Emergency Road & Sewer Repairs 4-21-2026 Attachment 1- Notice of Completion Road Repair No. 1
Attachment 2- Notice of Completion Road Repair No. 2
Attachment 3 - Notice of Completion Sewer Repair
Attachment 4 - Project Photos
Attachments:
8. Award Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks, Inc. for a Comprehensive Development Code Update
Recommended Action:
April 21, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional
Services Agreement with PlaceWorks, Inc. in the amount of $344,530 and reserve a contingency of $34,453 for a total contract cost of $378,983 for a Comprehensive Development Code Update.
Staff Person: Principal Planner Ryan Leonard
SR Placeworks, Inc Contract 4-21-2026
Attachment 1 - Placeworks Proposal
Attachment 2 - Proposal Fee Schedule
Attachments:
PUBLIC HEARING
Individuals wishing to comment on public hearing items must submit a speaker slip to the City Clerk with the numbered agenda item noted. Speaker slips should be turned in prior to an agenda item being taken up.
Comments will be limited to five minutes for Public Hearing items.
WAIVE READING OF ORDINANCES
Approve the reading by title of all ordinances and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.
9. 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan Recommended Action:
It
is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and, upon receiving public testimony:
(1) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-14 approving the 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan (AAP); (2) Authorize staff to modify the AAP as directed by the City Council; (3) Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute and transmit all required documents, including the adopted 2026-2027 AAP and any amendments, to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to ensure timely receipt of funds.
Staff Person: Economic Development Supervisor Eydee Jimenez SR Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan 4-21-2026 Resolution 2026-14
Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Action Plan Decommendation
Attachment 3 - Exhibit B Application Matrix Summary
Attachment 4 - Draft Annual Action Plan
Attachment 5 - Application Notebooks
Attachments:
10. Conditional Use Permit CUP24-00012; Applicant: AUE Energy LLC; APN:
3064-401-10
Recommended Action:
The Planning Commision recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution
April 21, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda
No. 2026-07 Approving Conditional Use Permit CUP24-00012 and adopting the associated mitigated negative declaration pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
Staff Person: Associate Planner Leilani Henry
SR Conditional Use Permit CUP24-00012 4-21-2026
Attachment 1 - Site Plan
Attachment 2 - Floor Plan
Attachment 3 - Aerial Photo
Attachment 4 - General Plan Map
Attachment 5 - Census Tract Map
Attachment 6 - Colored Elevations
Attachments 7- Comment Letters
Attachment 8 - Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Resolution 2026-07
Attachment 10 - Draft Conditions of Approval
Attachments:
NEW BUSINESS
11. Award Construction Contract for the Maple Avenue Street Improvement Project, Construction Order No. 7169
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Award
a construction contract for the Maple Avenue Street Improvement Project (Construction Order No. 7169) to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder, LCR Earthwork and Engineering, Corp. for the total bid amount of $4,902,678, inclusive of Additive Alternate No. 1;
2. Approve an additional 14% contingency in the amount of $686,375, for the not-to-exceed total construction contract amount of $5,589,053; and
3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the contract and any documents related thereto.
Staff Person: Assistant Project Manager Dena Alcayaga
SR Award Contract for Maple Avenue Improvement Project 4-21-2026 Attachment 1 - Notice of Exemption
Attachments:
12. Proposed Hesperia Merchandise Store Program
Recommended Action:
It
is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff on opportunities to implement a Hesperia Merchandise Store program.
Staff Person: Director of Development Services Orlando Acevedo SR Proposed Merchandise Store Program 4-21-2026Attachments:
April 21, 2026City Council Meeting Agenda
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COMMENTS
The Council may report on their activities as appointed representatives of the City on various Boards and Committees and/or may make comments of general interest or report on their activities as a representative of the City.
CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY/STAFF REPORTS
The City Manager, City Attorney or staff may make announcements or reports concerning items of interest to the Council and the public.
ADJOURNMENT
I, Jessica Giber, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Hesperia, California do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda on Thursday, April 16, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. pursuant to California Government Code §54954.2.
_____________________________
Jessica Giber, Assistant City Clerk
Documents produced by the City and distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting regarding items on the agenda will be made available in the City Clerk's Office during normal business hours.
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
City of Hesperia
Meeting Minutes – Draft
City Council
Tuesday, April 7, 2026 6:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
HESPERIA CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
HESPERIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
HESPERIA WATER DISTRICT
CLOSED SESSION – 5:00 PM
Roll Call
Present: 5 - Mayor Bennington, Mayor Pro Tem Pullen, Council Member Gregg, Council Member Lee, and Council
Member Ochoa
Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation:
Government Code Section – 54956.9(d)2
1. One (1) Case
Conference with Real Property Negotiators – Property Negotiations Government Code Section – 54956.8
1. Real Property Negotiations
Negotiating Parties: City of Hesperia and Hesperia Park and Recreation District Location: APN 0398-0131-34
Under Negotiations: Price and Terms
CALL TO ORDER - 6:31 PM
A. Invocation
B. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
C. Roll Call
Present: 5 - Mayor Bennington, Mayor Pro Tem Pullen, Council Member Gregg, Council Member Lee,
and Council Member Ochoa
City Council Chambers
9700 Seventh Ave.
Hesperia CA, 92345
D. Agenda Revisions and Announcements by City Clerk
E. Closed Session Reports by City Attorney
ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Proclamation to The San Bernardino County Children’s Network declaring April as Child Abuse Prevention Month.
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS (For items and matters not listed on the agenda) The following people commented:
Bob Nelson via voicemail
Kim Jones
Al Vogler
Hesperia News
Ken Anderson
JOINT CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Gregg, seconded by Pullen, that the Joint Consent Calendar minus item 3, 7, and 12 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Gregg, Bennington, Lee, Ochoa, and Pullen
Nay: 0
1. Consideration
of the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesday, March 17, 2026.
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Draft Minutes from the Regular Meeting held Tuesda
y, March 17, 2026.
Sponsors: Assistant City Clerk Jessica Giber
2. Warrant Run Report (City - Successor Agency - Housing Authority - Community Development Commission - Water)
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hes
peria Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.
Sponsors: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
3. Ratification of Emergency Purchases from Winter Storm 2025 Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council and the Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District (District) ratify,
by Resolution No. 2026-18, emergency purchases in the amount of $1,047,222 made in response to the December 23, 2025 storm event. It is further recommended that the City Council and Board adopt Resolution No. 2026-03 amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget by $1,276,587 to account for total storm-related costs
Sponsors: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
4. OpenGov, Inc. for Financial Reporting and Budgeting & Planning Software Contract
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a five- year (5) agreement with OpenGov, Inc. (OpenGov), in an amount not-to-exceed $289,516, to continue providing software pertaining to its financial transparency portal and the development and preparation of the City’s budget.
Sponsors: Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
5. Attachment Procurement - Sweeper and Loader Bucket
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District authorize the Cit
y Manager to enter into an agreement with Sonsray Machinery for the purchase of one (1) sweeper attachment and one (1) 4 x 1 loader bucket in the not-to-exceed amount of $55,000.
Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez
6. Vehicle Procurement - One (1) 8-Yard Dump Truck
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District authorize the Cit
y Manager to enter into an agreement with Valew Quality Truck Bodies - 1954 MFG for the purchase of one (1) 2027 Mack MD7 8-Yard dump truck in the not-to-exceed amount of $136,863.
Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez
7. Amend Professional Services Agreement for Construction Support Services for the Ranchero Road Aqueduct Crossing Project, C.O. No. 7139
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council amend Professional Services Agreement No. 2021-22-064 with TranS
ystems Corporation for additional construction support services for the Ranchero Road Aqueduct Crossing Project, C.O. No. 7139, in amount of $65,000, for a not-to-exceed total of $213,500.
Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez
8. Acceptance of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Grant - Tank Coatings - Plant 23, Plant 21, and Plant 22 Projects
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Accept the c
ompleted Tank Coatings - Plant 23-R23/1 (C.O. No. 8094), Plant 21-R21/1 (C.O.
No. 8095), and Plant 22-R22/2 (C.O. No. 8090) Projects; and
2. Authorize staff to record a “Notice of Completion;” and
3. Release all withheld retention amounts after a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days from the date of recordation.
Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez
9. Amendment to Street Sweeper Rental Agreement with Haaker Equipment Company Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the existing street s
weeper rental agreement with Haaker Equipment Company to increase contract authority by $40,000, for a revised not-to-exceed amount of $125,000.
Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez
10. D&H Water Systems - Increase to Contract
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council and Board Members of the Hesperia Water District authorize the City Manager to
amend the agreement with D&H Water Systems in the amount of $15,000 in the new not-to-exceed amount of $101,405, for the purchase of calcium hypochlorite chlorine.
Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez
11. Acceptance of Public Improvements for Tract 16591-1 Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District adopt Resolution No. 20
26-06 accepting the public improvements for Tract 16591-1 located on the west side of Tamarisk Avenue and south of Muscatel Street. (Applicant: Harris Homes Inc.) Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez
12. Animal Shelter Evaporative Cooler Replacement
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Allison Mechan
ical Inc to replace (10) Evaporative Coolers at the Animal Shelter in the not-to-exceed amount of $98,995 that includes a contingency of 10%.
Sponsors: Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez A motion was made by Ochoa, seconded by Lee, that items 3, 7, and 12 be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Gregg, Bennington, Lee, Ochoa, and Pullen
Nay: 0
13. Annual Report o
n Status and Implementation of the General Plan
Recommended Action:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council review this annual report, and direct staff to transm
it copies to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, and the Department of Housing and Community Development as required by law.
Sponsors: Principal Planner Ryan Leonard
14. CalRecycle Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-013 authorizing the City Manager to subm
it payment program applications for the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
City/County Payment Program for all CalRecycle payment programs for a period of five (5) years from the date of adoption of this resolution.
Sponsors: Assistant to the City Manager Tammy Pelayes
NEW BUSINESS
15. Consideration of Resolution No. 2026-017 Approving the Measure I Continuation Expenditure Plan Developed by the San Bernardino County
Transportation Authority
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-017 approving the Measure I Continuation
Expenditure Plan developed by the
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority.
Sponsors: Assistant to the City Manager Tammy Pelayes A motion was made by Ochoa, seconded by Lee, that this item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Gregg, Bennington, Lee, Ochoa, and Pullen
Nay: 0
16. Reject
all Bids and Appropriate Funding for Waterline Material Betterment for the Highway 395 Waterline Relocation Project, Construction Order No. 8096
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District:
1. Reject all submitted bids for the Highway 395 Waterline Relocation Project (Construction Order No. 8096).
2. Adopt Joint Resolution No. 2026-05 and Hesperia Water District Resolution No. 2026-03, amending the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Capital Improvement budget by appropriating an additional $24,000, for a total of $274,000 to Water Capital Fund 701 for waterline betterments associated with the project.
Sponsors:
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Cassandra Sanchez A motion was made by Gregg, seconded by Pullen, that this item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Gregg, Bennington, Lee, Ochoa, and Pullen
Nay: 0
17. Acceptance of
Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Funds
Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Accept Saf
e Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant funds in the amount of $1,577,600 for the City of Hesperia Vision Zero Action Plan, the supplemental Complete Streets Plan, and supporting studies.
2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all grant-related documents, agreements, and amendments as necessary to implement the grant.
3. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-04, accepting SS4A grant funds, authorizing execution of the grant agreement.
Sponsors: Project Manager Deanna Lestina
A motion was made by Ochoa, seconded by Gregg, that this item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Gregg, Bennington, Lee, Ochoa, and Pullen
Nay: 0
Al Vogler commented on item #17.
18. Contract A ward - Dirt Road & Shoulder Repair and Retention Basin Rehabilitations Recommended Action:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the award of up to four (4) contracts for dirt road repairs, dirt shoulder rep
airs, Tamarisk Basin rehabilitation, and H-01 Basin rehabilitation, in a combined not-to-exceed
amount of $1,001,356.
Sponsors:
Assistant City Manager Casey Brooksher
A motion was made by Ochoa, seconded by Pullen, that this item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - Gregg, Bennington, Lee, Ochoa, and Pullen
Nay: 0
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND COMMENTS
The Mayor and Council Members reported from various events and Committees.
Council Member Gregg requested a memo regarding the County’s Rock Springs Road project.
CITY MANAGER/CITY ATTORNEY/STAFF REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:36 p.m. in memory of Taylor Cole. ___________________________
Jessica Giber, Assistant City Clerk
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members
City Council, as Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency
Chair and Commissioners, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Commissioners, Community Development Commission Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Casey Brooksher, Assistant City Manager
Keith Cheong, Deputy Finance Director
Verenise Fierros, Accountant
SUBJECT: Warrant Run Report (City – Successor Agency – Housing Authority – Community Development Commission – Water)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the Council/Board ratify the warrant run and payroll report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.
BACKGROUND
The Warrant Run totals represented below are for the period February 28, 2026, through March 13, 2026.
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Financial Health – Maintain a balanced budget and adequate reserves.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Warrant Runs
Agency/District Accounts Payable Payroll Wires Totals
City of Hesperia $1,691,673.80 $410,064.28 $0.00 $2,101,738.08 Successor Agency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Housing Authority 2,409.20 161.04 0.00 2,570.24
Community Development Commission 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 929,866.50 156,312.88 0.00 1,086,179.38
Totals $2,623,949.50 $566,538.20 $0.00 $3,190,487.70
YEAR-TO PRIOR FY YTD
W/E W/E WARRANT DATE DATE
FUND # FUND NAME 3/6/2026 3/13/2026 TOTALS Wires TOTALS * TOTALS Accounts Payable
100 GENERAL 377,448.55$ 228,812.70$ 606,261.25$ -$ 28,231,029.00$ 26,492,201.17$ 105 PENSION OBLIGATION TRUST -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
106 OPEB TRUST -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
110 SILVERWOOD -$ 10,063.00$ 10,063.00$ -$ 83,294.75$ 77,280.98$ 200 HESPERIA FIRE DISTRICT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
204 MEASURE I - RENEWAL 106,357.77$ 16,666.30$ 123,024.07$ -$ 2,488,268.57$ 37,231.76$ 207 LOCAL TRANSPORT-SB 325 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1.64$
209 GAS TAX-RMRA -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,976.49$ -$
210 HFPD (PERS) -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,896,318.00$ 1,755,819.00$ 241 CFD 2021-1 Resid Maint. & Serv -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,890.00$ 1,280.00$ 242 CFD 2022-1 Non-Resd Maint & Serv -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,373.00$ 1,280.00$ 243 CFD 2023-1 Silverwood Maint -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,344.00$ 1,280.00$ 251 CDBG 47,261.50$ -$ 47,261.50$ -$ 1,496,049.14$ 2,903,062.40$ 254 AB2766 - TRANSIT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
255 AB3229 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
256 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS GRANT 785.40$ 907.20$ 1,692.60$ -$ 31,306.39$ 36,803.37$ 262 SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT -$ -$ -$ -$ 164,739.76$ 104,497.49$ 263 STREETS MAINTENANCE 33,692.74$ 25,993.08$ 59,685.82$ -$ 1,129,505.95$ 1,937,869.04$ 300 DEV. IMPACT FEES - STREET -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 149,570.82$ 301 DEV. IMPACT FEES - STORM DRAIN -$ -$ -$ -$ 59,843.30$ 129,647.43$ 306 DEV. IMPACT FEES - 2018-STREETS -$ 173,726.17$ 173,726.17$ -$ 1,532,834.27$ 1,230,619.55$ 307 DIF 2018-DRAINAGE FACILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$ 26,353.00$ 168,099.30$ 309 DIF 2018-CITY HALL FACILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 312 DIF 2018-POLICE FACILITIES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
313 DIF A-04 DRAINAGE -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,154,638.51$ 402 WATER RIGHTS ACQUISITION -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,127,640.97$ 1,666,463.80$ 403 2013 REFUNDING LEASE REV BONDS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 404 2023 REFUNDING LEASE REV BONDS -$ -$ -$ -$ 577,279.98$ 2,500.00$ 504 CITY WIDE STREETS - CIP -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300,523.39$ 2,785,354.47$ 509 CITY FACILITIES CIP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
800 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 95,800.17$ 563,831.51$ 659,631.68$ -$ 7,229,337.21$ 6,981,382.19$ 801 TRUST/AGENCY 9,722.19$ 605.52$ 10,327.71$ -$ 1,567,367.80$ 1,246,370.69$ 802 AD 91-1 AGENCY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
804 TRUST-INTEREST BEARING -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,854.70$ 42,379.11$ 807 CFD 2005-1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,278,658.33$ 1,186,302.97$ 808 HFPD (TRANSITION) -$ -$ -$ -$ 335,635.00$ 317,435.02$ 815 PLAN REVIEW TRUST - FRONTIER -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ CITY 671,068.32$ 1,020,605.48$ 1,691,673.80$ -$ 50,569,423.00$ 50,409,370.71$ 163 REDEVELOP OBLIG RETIREMENT-2018 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,475,979.87$ 9,690,950.62$ SUCCESSOR AGENCY -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,475,979.87$ 9,690,950.62$ 370 HOUSING AUTHORITY -$ 2,409.20$ 2,409.20$ -$ 15,292.92$ 42,724.10$ HOUSING AUTHORITY -$ 2,409.20$ 2,409.20$ -$ 15,292.92$ 42,724.10$ 170 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700 WATER OPERATING 200,399.81$ 261,864.52$ 462,264.33$ -$ 16,738,451.94$ 10,830,843.25$ 703 WATER CAPITAL REHAB AND REPLACE -$ -$ -$ -$ 545,796.29$ -$ 705 WATER PENSION OBLIGATION TRUST -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000.00$ 701 WATER CAPITAL -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,007,040.14$ 16,473.00$ 710 SEWER OPERATING 459,906.26$ 3,962.25$ 463,868.51$ -$ 10,671,067.12$ 4,590,626.67$ 711 SEWER CAPITAL -$ 145.00$ 145.00$ -$ 1,330,766.95$ 1,617,514.95$ 720 RECLAIMED WATER OPERATIONS 3,468.68$ 119.98$ 3,588.66$ -$ 263,540.73$ 276,546.60$ WATER 663,774.75$ 266,091.75$ 929,866.50$ -$ 30,556,663.17$ 18,082,004.47$ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TOTAL 1,334,843.07$ 1,289,106.43$ 2,623,949.50$ -$ 89,617,358.96$ 78,225,049.90$ REG. PAYROLL
City -$ 410,064.28$ 410,064.28$ -$ 5,993,018.35$ 6,135,489.13$ Housing Authority -$ 161.04$ 161.04$ -$ 2,896.40$ 4,822.97$ Water -$ 156,312.88$ 156,312.88$ -$ 2,844,840.21$ 2,843,296.31$ PAYROLL TOTAL -$ 566,538.20$ 566,538.20$ -$ 8,840,754.96$ 8,983,608.41$ City of Hesperia
WARRANT RUNS
2/28/2026-03/13/2026
Attachment 1
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members
City Council, Serving as Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency
Chair and Commissioners, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Commissioners, Community Development Commission Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Casey Brooksher, Assistant City Manager
Marc Morales, Senior Accountant
Jonathan Settle, Accountant
SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Cash Report for the unaudited period ended February 28, 2026.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the Council/Board accept the Treasurer’s Cash Report for the City, Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency, Hesperia Housing Authority, Community Development Commission, and Water District.
BACKGROUND
This report is presented to the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 53646 (b) setting forth the City’s investment portfolio.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The Treasurer’s Cash Reports for each agency, Income Statement for the Hesperia Golf Course, and Cash Summary Report for the Animal Control Donation Trust are presented on the following pages.
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Financial Health – Maintain a balanced budget and adequate reserves.
FISCAL IMPACT
These reports reflect unaudited cash balances as of February 28, 2026.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
Provide alternative direction to staff.
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members Treasurer’s Cash Report
April 21, 2026
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. City of Hesperia Investment Report
2. Successor Agency to the Hesperia Community Redevelopment Agency Investment Report
3. Hesperia Housing Authority Investment Report
4. Community Development Commission Investment Report
5. Hesperia Water District Investment Report
6. Hesperia Golf & Country Club Consolidated Income Statement – Unaudited February 2026
7. Animal Control Donation Trust Cash Flow Summary – Unaudited February 2026
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members Treasurer’s Cash Report
April 21, 2026
FUND VALUE
General Fund (100 & 800) 41,998,167.54
Pension Obligation Trust (105) 594,686.87
OPEB Trust (106) 5,901.15
Silverwood 106,152.03
Measure I - Renewal (204) 13,840,656.34
Gas Tax Fund (205) 2,855,335.93
Gas Tax Swap (206) 2,114,169.98
Local Transportation SB325 (207) 1,211,149.58
Gas Tax - RMRA (209) 12,619,620.95
HFPD (PERS) (210) 1,606,178.00
Public Art (230) 273,888.80
CFD 2021-1 Resid Maint & Serv 3,201.31
CFD 2022-1 Non-Resid Maint & Serv 442,759.13
CFD 2023-1 Silverwood Maint 37,750.11
Community Dev Block Grant (251, 252, & 253) (314,099.46) AB27666 - Transit (254) 26,819.92
AB3229 Supplemental Law (255) 567,298.35
Beverage Recycling Grant (256) 336,376.38
Disaster (260) 64,961.95
American Rescue Plan Grant (261) 6,947,543.47
SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant (262) 92,114.89
Public Works Street Maint (263) 1,892,033.61
Development Impact Fund 2018 (306-312) 34,227,877.26
Development Impact Fund A-04 Drainage (313) 611,495.28
Development Impact Fund (300-304) 7,851,002.32
2012 Water Rights Acquisition (402) 792,620.19
2013 Refunding Lease Rev Bonds (403) -
2023 Refunding Lease Rev Bonds (404) 1,594,731.81
City Wide-Capital Projects (504) (7,338,950.77)
AD No. 91-1 (802) 417,914.52
CFD 2005-1 (807) 2,082,510.16
HFPD Transition (808) -
Trust Fund (801, 803-806, & 815) 1,300,122.52
TOTAL CITY FUNDS 128,861,990.12$
CITY OF HESPERIA
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members Treasurer’s Cash Report
April 21, 2026
FUND VALUE
RORF Retention - (163) 1,664,871.21$
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FUND VALUE
Hesperia Housing Authority Fund (370) 4,692,103.87$
VVEDA Housing Authority (371) 2,061,989.62
TOTAL HOUSING AUTHORITY FUNDS 6,754,093.49$
HESPERIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
FUND VALUE
Community Development Commission Fund (170) 3,725,790.08$
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council/Board Members Treasurer’s Cash Report
April 21, 2026
VALUE
Water Operating (700) 14,615,628.13$
Water Capital (701) 10,341,278.14
Water Capital Rehab and Replace (703) 4,011,221.09
Water Contamination Mitigation (704) 2,818,771.88
Water Pension Obilgation Trust (705) 13,221.94
Water OPEB Trust (706) 15.15
Sewer Operating (710) 6,334,691.35
Sewer Capital (711) 511,043.25
Sewer Capital Rehab and Replace (713) 897,071.18
Reclaimed Water Operations (720) 362,608.16
TOTAL WATER FUNDS 39,905,550.27$
WATER
FUND
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members
Chair and Commission, Community Development Commission
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Housing Authority
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Fire Protection District
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Casey Brooksher, Assistant City Manager
Keith Cheong, Deputy Finance Director
SUBJECT: Audited Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council, Community Development Commission, Hesperia Housing Authority Board, Hesperia Water District Board, and Hesperia Fire Protection District Board receive and file the audited Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025.
BACKGROUND
City governments that receive Federal funding in excess of $750,000 in a fiscal year are required by Federal law (Office of Management and Budget [OMB] Circular A -133) to be audited. In addition, the bond documents for the City’s debt require annual audits of the City’s financial transactions.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The City’s independent auditor, CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (CLA) performed the audit for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
The documents that comprise the Financial Statements, commonly referred to as the Audit for the City, are as follows:
City of Hesperia–Annual Comprehensive Financial Report – June 30, 2025 Single Audit of Federally Assisted Grant Programs – June 30, 2025 Community Development Commission–Component Unit Financial Statements – June 30, 2025 Hesperia Housing Authority–Component Unit Financial Statements – June 30, 2025 Hesperia Water District–Component Unit Financial Statements – June 30, 2025 Hesperia Fire Protection District–Component Unit Financial Statements – June 30, 2025
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council
Audited Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 April 21, 2026
The Hesperia Housing Authority Component Unit Financial Statement was distributed on December 1 6, 202 5 in compliance with State requirements. The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) was distributed on January 8, 2026, and the remaining Component Unit Financial Statements were provided to the Council on February 26, 2026. Finally, the Single Audit of Federally Assisted Grant Programs was distributed on March 31, 2026. Public copies of all the above-referenced documents are available in the City Clerk’s Office and have been posted on the City’s website.
As a matter of information, the City was awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Outstanding Financial Reporting for Fiscal Year 202 3-24 by the Government Finance Officers’ Associat ion (GFOA). That was the twenty-third consecutive year the City has earned this prestigious award.
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Financial Health - Maintain a balanced budget and adequate reserves.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
The reports listed below were previously submitted to the Council (#1 on January 8, 2026, #2, #4, and #5 on February 26, 2026, #3 on December 1 6, 2025, and #6 on March 31, 2026). Public copies are available in the City Clerk’s Office and have been posted on the City’s website:
1. June 30, 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
2. June 30, 202 5 Component Unit Financial Statements for the Community Development Commission
3. June 30, 2025 Component Unit Financial Statements for the Hesperia Housing Authority
4. June 30, 2025 Component Unit Financial Statements for the Hesperia Water District
5. June 30, 2025 Component Unit Financial Statements for the Hesperia Fire Protection District
6. June 30, 2026 Single Audit of Federally Assisted Grant Programs
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members:
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Casey Brooksher, Assistant City Manager
Jonathan Settle, Accountant
SUBJECT: Contract Amendment for Printing Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District authorize the City Manager to approve an amendment of $80,000 to the existing contract with Wirz and Company Printing, Inc., for a revised not-to-exceed amount of $160,000 and approve a one- year contract extension for printing services.
BACKGROUND
Departments Citywide need printed items for their various functions and utilize a City-wide agreement. These items include, but are not limited to, business cards, calendars, envelopes, W2 forms, inspection/violation forms, water quality reports, and newsletters. Ordering through a comprehensive agreement allows staff to operate more efficiently by streamlining printing services that are tailored to the department's needs.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
The current contract is set to expire June 30, 2026, and a contract extension is needed to continue to utilize printing services . City Staff recommends extending the contract for an additional year.
Additionally, the vendor has agreed to hold the current contract pricing for one more year through June 30, 2027.
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Financial Health - Maintain a balanced budget and adequate reserves.
FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funding will be included for the various departments in the proposed Fiscal Year 2026- 27 Budget.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
None
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Cassandra Sanchez, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tina Souza, Senior Project Manager
SUBJECT: Award Construction Contract for FY 2024-25 CDBG Street Improvements, Construction Order No. 7175
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Award a construction contract for the FY 202 4-25 CDBG Street Improvements, Construction Order (C.O.) No. 7175 project to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder, Sully-Miller Contracting Company for the bid amount of $ 339,900; approve an additional 10% contingency in the amount of $33,990, for a not-to-exceed total construction contract amount of $373,890; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
BACKGROUND
The City Council has continuously expressed a desire to improve existing roadways within the City. As a result, staff has sought innovative ways to fund such improvements. Annually the City receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In the past, a large part of this funding was directed to programs, which left small amounts available for capital projects. In order to accomplish the Council’s goal of improving more streets throughout the City, staff has designated a larger amount of CDBG funding towards the CDBG Capital projects.
The FY 202 4-25 CDBG Street Improvement s (Project) consists of the reconstruction of the existing roadway along Live Oak Street, between Maple Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. The project will remove existing asphalt and place new asphalt to restore the roadway surface.
The proposed Project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) and Section 15302 (Class 2 – Replacement or Reconstruction) as the project involves the repair or reconstruction of an existing roadway within the public right -of-way with negligible or no expansion of use or capacity. A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse upon approval of award.
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Award Construction Contract for FY 2024-25 CDBG Street Improvements, Construction Order No. 7175 April 21, 2026
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
This project was advertised for bids beginning on February 18, 2026. More than 1,000 contractors were notified about the project through Public Purchase, the City’s online bidding platform. Bids were received, opened, and publicly read on March 19, 2026.
The City received the following eleven (11) bids, which were utilized to determine the lowest responsible/responsive bidder:
Contractor Bid Amount
Sully-Miller Contracting Company $ 339,900.00 ONYX PAVING COMPANY, INC. $ 387,000.00 Hardy and Harper, Inc. $ 432,000.00
S Christensen Engineering, Inc. $ 485,398.16 Calmex Engineering, Inc. $ 491,417.00 C. A. Rasmussen, Inc. $ 679,212.00
H L Hitchcock Construction Inc. $ 700,500.00 Nolimit Construction $ 944,777.97
LCR Earthwork & Engineering, Corp. $ 968,257.50 Van Engineering, Inc $ 1,051,078.00
Shiraz Construction $ 1,088,600.00
After review of the submitted bids, staff has determined that Sully-Miller Contracting Company is the lowest responsive/responsible bidder. Sully -Miller Contracting Comp any complied with the requirements of the bid documents, including that which is a requirement of HUD. Sully -Miller Contracting Company is a licensed general engineering contractor and has successfully completed projects of similar size and scope. After staff’s review and due diligence, the contractor is qualified to perform the work required for this project. Therefore, staff is recommending that Council award a contract to Sully-Miller Contracting Company for construction of the FY 2024-25 CDBG Street Improvements, C.O. No. 7175.
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Capital Improvement – Continually evaluate capital improvement priorities.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the Project is budgeted in t he FY 2025 -26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) .
Funding includes $1,444,777 in Fund 251 – Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the FY 2024-25 CDBG Street Improvements Project, C.O. 7175.
The recommended construction contract, including contingency, as well as construction engineering and materials testing, is within the projects available budget.
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Award Construction Contract for FY 2024-25 CDBG Street Improvements, Construction Order No. 7175 April 21, 2026
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Do not award the construction contract. HUD grant funds may be at risk for failure to use funds timely.
2. Provide staff an alternative direction.
ATTACHMENT(S)
None
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members
Chair and Board Members, Hesperia Water District
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Cassandra Sanchez, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tina Souza, Senior Project Manager
Dena Alcayaga, Assistant Project Manager
SUBJECT: Acceptance of 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 and No. 2, and Sewer Repairs
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council and Board of Directors of the Hesperia Water District:
1) Accept the completed 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 and No. 2, and Sewer Repairs;
2) Authorize staff to record a Notice of Completion for each project; and 3) Authorize the release of all withheld retention amounts no sooner than thirty (30) calendar days following the date of recordation.
BACKGROUND
On December 23, 2025, a significant storm event brought unprecedented rainfall to the City of Hesperia and the surrounding High Desert region, with some areas receiving over 7.5 inches of rain. This event resulted in widespread flooding and extensive damage throughout the City.
On December 26, 2025, the City’s Director of Emergency Services issued a local emergency declaration (Resolution No. 2025 -051), which was subsequently ratified by the City Council on December 29, 2025.
To expedite the City’s emergenc y response and protect public health, safety, and welfare, staff streamlined procurement procedures to advance critical repair work. This effort resulted in multiple emergency projects, including 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 and No. 2, and Sewer Pipe Repair.
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 included asphalt pavement repair and replacement on Arcadia Avenue, Lassen Avenue, Peach Avenue, and Tioga Street.
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 2 included earthwork, grading, material import/export and placement, removal and disposal of a damaged storm drain box and other debris, and sewer line inspection on Cedar Street and Bandicoot Trail. 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Sewer Rep airs included earthwork, grading, material import/export and placement, sewer pipe replacement, roadway and
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members, Chair and Board Members of the Hesperia Water District Acceptance of 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 and No. 2, and Sewer Repairs
April 21, 2026
shoulder restoration, and installation of aggregate base and new asphalt pavement on Valencia Street and Topaz Avenue.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
Construction for 2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair No. 1 and No. 2, and Sewer Repair s were completed in February 2026, with a total cost of $286,375. These expenditures were ratified by the City Council on April 7, 2026, through Resolution No. 2026-018.
Description Amount
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair
No. 1 $145,558
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair
No. 2 $27,737
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Sewer
Repairs $113,080
Upon acceptance of the projects, staff will record a Notice of Completion for each project. In accordance with applicable requirements, retention funds will be released no sooner than thirty (30) calendar days following recordation.
Following City Council acceptance, each project will be covered by a one-year warranty period.
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Public Safety- Ensure public safety resources adequately protect our community.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with approval of the recommended action.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Notice of completion Road Repair 1
2. Notice of completion Road Repair 2
3. Notice of completion Sewer Repair
4. Project Photos
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Attn: Justin Richard
CITY OF HESPERIA
Engineering Division
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia, CA 92345
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
RECORDING FEE WAIVED PURSUANT TO CAL. GOV’T. CODE 27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(CA Civil Code §§ 8180-8190 and 9200-9208)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is OWNER of an interest of estate in the hereinafter described real properties.
2. The FULL NAME of the undersigned is: City of Hesperia
3. The FULL ADDRESS of the undersigned is: 9700 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia, California 92345.
4. Work of improvement on the properties hereinafter described was completed and accepted as a whole on April 21, 2026
5. The NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE DIRECT CONTRACTOR for such work of improvement as a whole is:
H L Hitchcock Construction Inc. 10180 Victoria St. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729
6. There was completed upon the herein described properties a work of improvement as a whole and is described as follows:
Included asphalt pavement repair and replacement on Arcadia Avenue, Lassen Avenue, Peach Avenue, and Tioga Street.
7. The real properties on which said work of improvement was completed are located in the City of Hesperia, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and are described as follows:
APN(S): N/A – work was located within public right of way at various locations
8. The street address(es) of said property(ies) is/are:
N/A – work was located within public right of way at various locations
Justin Richard, Assistant Project Manager Signature:
Name and Title of Person Completing this Form for the City of Hesperia, a municipal corporation of the State of California
Date: May 21, 2026
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned authorized agent, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the Assistant City Manager and Director of Development Services for the municipal corporation of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I make this verification on behalf of said municipal corporation, owner of the aforesaid interest of estate in the property therein described; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; and the facts therein stated are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Executed on , at Hesperia, California
Attachment 1
Signed:
Kevin Sin, Deputy City Engineer
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Attn: Dena Alcayaga
CITY OF HESPERIA
Engineering Division
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia, CA 92345
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
RECORDING FEE WAIVED PURSUANT TO CAL. GOV’T. CODE 27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(CA Civil Code §§ 8180-8190 and 9200-9208)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is OWNER of an interest of estate in the hereinafter described real properties.
2. The FULL NAME of the undersigned is: City of Hesperia
3. The FULL ADDRESS of the undersigned is: 9700 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia, California 92345.
4. Work of improvement on the properties hereinafter described was completed and accepted as a whole on April 21, 2026
5. The NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE DIRECT CONTRACTOR for such work of improvement as a whole is:
H L Hitchcock Construction Inc. 10180 Victoria St. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729
6. There was completed upon the herein described properties a work of improvement as a whole and is described as follows:
included earthwork, grading, material import/export and placement, removal and disposal of a damaged storm drain box and other debris, and sewer line inspection on Cedar Street and Bandicoot Trail.
7. The real properties on which said work of improvement was completed are located in the City of Hesperia, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and are described as follows:
APN(S): N/A – work was located within public right of way at various locations
8. The street address(es) of said property(ies) is/are:
N/A – work was located within public right of way at various locations
Dena Alcayaga, Assistant Project Manager Signature:
Name and Title of Person Completing this Form for the City of Hesperia, a municipal corporation of the State of California
Date: May 21, 2026
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned authorized agent, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the Assistant City Manager and Director of Development Services for the municipal corporation of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I make this verification on behalf of said municipal corporation, owner of the aforesaid interest of estate in the property therein described; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; and the facts therein stated are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Executed on , at Hesperia, California
Attachment 2
Signed:
Kevin Sin, Deputy City Engineer
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Attn: Deanna Lestina
CITY OF HESPERIA
Engineering Division
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia, CA 92345
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
RECORDING FEE WAIVED PURSUANT TO CAL. GOV’T. CODE 27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(CA Civil Code §§ 8180-8190 and 9200-9208)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is OWNER of an interest of estate in the hereinafter described real properties.
2. The FULL NAME of the undersigned is: City of Hesperia
3. The FULL ADDRESS of the undersigned is: 9700 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia, California 92345.
4. Work of improvement on the properties hereinafter described was completed and accepted as a whole on April 21, 2026
5. The NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE DIRECT CONTRACTOR for such work of improvement as a whole is:
Kelley’s Underground Construction, Inc 22411 US Highway 18 Apple Valley, Ca 92307
6. There was completed upon the herein described properties a work of improvement as a whole and is described as follows:
included earthwork, grading, material import/export and placement, sewer pipe replacement, roadway and shoulder restoration, and installation of aggregate base and new asphalt pavement on Valencia Street and Topaz Avenue.
7. 8.
9. The real properties on which said work of improvement was completed are located in the City of Hesperia, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and are described as follows:
APN(S): N/A – work was located within public right of way at various locations
10. The street address(es) of said property(ies) is/are:
N/A – work was located within public right of way at various locations
Deanna Lestina, Project Manager Signature:
Name and Title of Person Completing this Form for the City of Hesperia, a municipal corporation of the State of California
Date: May 21, 2026
VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned authorized agent, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the Assistant City Manager and Director of Development Services for the municipal corporation of the foregoing Notice of Completion; I make this verification on behalf of said municipal corporation, owner of the aforesaid interest of estate in the property therein described; I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; and the facts therein stated are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Attachment 3
Executed on , at Hesperia, California
Signed:
Kevin Sin, Deputy City Engineer
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repair
No. 1
Peach Avenue
Before
After
Attachment 4
Tioga Street
Before
After
Arcadia Avenue
After Repairs
Lassen Avenue
After Repairs
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Road Repairs
No. 2
Cedar Street/ Bandicoot Trail
Before
After
2025 December Adverse Weather Emergency Sewer Repairs
Tamarisk Avenue/ Valencia Street
Before
After
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Orlando Acevedo, Director of Development Services
Ryan Leonard, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Award Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks, Inc. for a Comprehensive Development Code Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks, Inc. in the amount of $344,530 and reserve a contingency of $34,453 for a total contract cost of $378,983 for a Comprehensive Development Code Update.
BACKGROUND
The City’s Development Code establishes zoning regulations, land use standards, permitting procedures, and other development requirements that collectively form the regulatory framework shaping future development and guiding growth in accordance with the Cit y’s General Plan. Although individual sections of the Development Code have been periodically amended to address specific issues or comply with new State legislation, the Code has not undergone a comprehensive, system-wide update in more than 30 years.
As a result, the Development Code has become a collection of incremental amendments adopted at different times, which has created inconsistencies, outdated terminology, and internal conflicts between chapters. Additionally, many provisions no longer reflect community goals, modern planning and zoning practices, current development trends, objective design requirements, and/or updated State housing and land-use mandates.
Given the pace of regulatory changes in California and the City’s ongoing residential and commercial growth, a comprehensive update is now necessary to ensure continued consistency with the General Plan, maintain compliance with State law, provide clear and predictable development standards, streamline permitting procedures, establish objective and measurable design criteria, and improve the overall organization and usability of the Code for staff, applicants, and the public.
Additionally, the City Council identified undertaking a comprehensive Development Code update as a key strategy to achieve the future development goals outlined in the adopted five- year Strategic Plan.
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Award Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks, Inc. for a Comprehensive Development Code Update
April, 21, 2026
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
On January 4, 2026 , a Request for Proposal (RFP) for work to be completed on the above - mentioned Development Code Update was published and made available for firms to submit proposals through a formal process utilizing Public Purchase, the City’s online site. Eight proposals were received and reviewed by a selection committee. The proposals were evaluated based on certain c riteria such as past experience, technical expertise and approach to the scope of work.
The selection committee conducted interviews for the top 3 ranked firms. Staff recommends PlaceWorks as the most qualified firm based on their experience , working kno wledge of Hesperia, and demonstrated ability to deliver the required update s. Following receipt of the proposal, staff proceeded to negotiate a scope of work and a contract. The cost of the contract is $344,530. The expected time to complete the update is 12-18 months. A brief synopsis of the scope of work is discussed below:
Public Outreach and Engagement: Meaningful community and stakeholder engagement will be a key component of the comprehensive Development Code update. PlaceWorks will u se a flexible, collaborative outreach strategy that balances public input with technical work.
Stakeholder Meetings : Six stakeholder meetings will be conducted with developers, local builders, real estate professionals, business owners, and property owners to identify constraints, opportunities, and desired improvements within the Code.
Community Workshops : Six in -person community workshops, held in conjunction with the Planning Commission and/or City Council meetings at key milestones, will be conducted throughout the process. These workshops will introduce the project, present draft concepts, and provide opportunities for public input on zon ing issues and proposed revisions. They will also include review of residential, commercial, and industrial use standards; permit processing procedures; definitions; and draft Development Code chapters.
Online Survey: An online survey will be distributed to expand accessibility and engage a broader cross-section of City residents. The survey will complement in -person workshops and help capture additional community feedback.
Development Code Amendments: The update will include, but is not limited to, the following:
Reorganize and reformat Title 16 of the Municipal Code as needed to ensure that the Development Code is user-friendly for the public and staff; A comprehensive review of the definitions;
Examine the required findings for all entitlement applications to determine if additional findings need to be made;
Address nonconforming uses and structures;
Review the allowed uses in commercial and industrial zones to better differentiate uses across the three commercial zones and two industrial zones; Review commercial and industrial design materials and configuration;
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Award Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks, Inc. for a Comprehensive Development Code Update
April, 21, 2026
Review the allowed use table to determine if any changes should be made to the required approval process;
Add additional development regulations for industrial developments that contain outdoor storage;
Review animal regulations and best practices;
Review and update allowed uses within the agricultural and rural residential zoning to bring uses more current and include standards where needed; Review landscape ordinance;
Modify the wireless facilities section of the Code to be consistent with Federal and State law, add additional regulations for the ongoing maintenance of wireless facilities, and clarify location requirements;
Review and revise the devel opment standards to make sure that they are clear and easy for the public to understand;
Ensure compliance with new State laws, and Housing Element programs; Add new regulations for short -term vacation rentals to limit large gatherings and properties on residential properties;
Add new requirements for electric vehicle charging to be consistent with State law; Add new regulations for solar facilities located on commercial properties; Enhance signage design and materials standards.
PlaceWorks will also review the allowed uses and development standards in the Main Street and Freeway Corridor Specific Plan and determine, in coordination with staff, if there is a need to distinguish them more clearly from the Development Code.
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of the contract is $ 344,530, with an industry standard contingency of 10 percent ($34,453), for a total project cost of $378,983. Funding for this project will extend through two fiscal years as shown below:
FY-2025/26
Contract Cost $100,000
Total- FY-2025/26 $100,000
FY-2026/27
Contract Cost $244,530
10% Contingency $34,453
Total- FY-2026/27 $278,983
Total Contract Cost $344,530
10% Contingency $34,453
TOTAL $378,983
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
Award Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks, Inc. for a Comprehensive Development Code Update
April, 21, 2026
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 Budget included funding in the amount of $100,000 for a Comprehensive Development Code Update. If approved, funding for year two of the agreement and the 10% contingency will be included in the FY 2026/27 Budget
CITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM:
Future Development - Facilitate balanced growth to ensure cohesive community development and pursue economic development.
Public Safety - Ensure public safety resources adequately protect our community.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
1. Provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Comprehensive Development Code Update Proposal from PlaceWorks
2. Proposal Fee Schedule
CITY OF HESPERIA • FEBRUARY 3, 2026
City of Hesperia
Comprehensive Development Code Update
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO RFP 2025-26-004
Attachment 1
PLACEWORKS.COM
SUBMITTED TO:
CITY OF HESPERIA
Jonathan Settle, Accountant
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia CA 92345
760.947.1188 | [email protected]
SUBMITTED BY:
PLACEWORKS
Mark Teague AICP
Principal, Land Use and Environmental Strategies
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana CA 92707
916.245.7500 | 714.966.9220 | [email protected]
FEBRUARY 3, 2026
City of Hesperia
Comprehensive Development Code Update
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO RFP 2025-26-004
Tec hnical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS i
CONTENTS
1. COVER LETTER 1
2. UNDERSTANDING 3
What We Know and Why It Matters .................................................... 3
3. APPROACH TO THE SCOPE OF WORK 5
Scope of Work ...................................................................................... 5 Proposed Schedule............................................................................. 12
4. EXPERIENCE 13
PlaceWorks ........................................................................................ 13 Team Organization ............................................................................. 19 Brief Biographies ................................................................................ 20 Resumes ............................................................................................. 25 Demonstrated Project Experience ..................................................... 45
5. REFERENCES 55
6. ADDENDA 57
1. COVER LETTER
1. COVER LETTER
February 3, 2026
Jonathan Settle
Accountant (Purchasing Section)
CITY OF HESPERIA | Planning Department
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia CA 92345
Subject: PlaceWorks’ Technical Proposal in Response to RFP 2025-26-004 Comprehensive Development Code Update for the City of Hesperia
Dear Jonathan Settle:
PlaceWorks is pleased to submit this proposal and is excited by the opportunity to continue to assist the City of Hesperia as it begins a comprehensive update to its Development Code. Having recently worked with the City on the focused General Plan update, we understand the significance of many of the issues the Development Code update is intended to address.
As one of the West’s most eminent planning, design, and environmental consulting firms, we serve both public- and private-sector clients in the fields of comprehensive planning, urban design, landscape architecture, environmental analysis and sciences, and GIS. Over our 50-year history, PlaceWorks has prepared numerous zoning and development code updates for communities throughout California. Our broad experience and technical proficiency give us a keen understanding of the complexities of translating high-level policy documents, like general plans, into enforceable development standards.
For this update, we have assembled a team of the brightest and best thinkers in planning and design, all of whom are well versed in zoning law and the many recent amendments to state and federal regulations that communities must now adhere to. We look forward to working alongside you to update your development code so that it both meets the changing statutory landscape for municipalities today and ensures new development is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
Through the General Plan update process, our team gained tremendous insight into the land use and zoning challenges the City is grappling with, as well as an appreciation for how passionately the residents and business owners care about the well-being of their community. We believe that our experience working with the City and familiarity with the High Desert make us uniquely qualified to assist Hesperia with this focused update.
PlaceWorks, Inc., a 100% employee-owned California S-Corporation headquartered in Santa Ana, California, was founded on September 5, 1975, and now employs a staff of approximately 150 people in six offices. We have five decades of experience with the public sector. Work on this project will be led by Cory Witter, the Project Manager of the 2025 General Plan Update, and performed from our corporate headquarters in Santa Ana (addresses and phone numbers below).
This Proposal, which contains no proprietary information, is submitted as a response to RFP 2025-26-004 Comprehensive Development Code Update. PlaceWorks has read and understands the RFP in its entirety,
FEBRUARY 3, 2026 | PAGE 2
including, without limitation, the scope and nature of the work, all appendices, attachments, exhibits, schedules, and addendum, as applicable. Per RFP instructions, our team’s Cost Proposal is provided under separate cover. This proposal shall remain valid for 90 days from the date of submittal. As a Principal, Mark Teague is a duly authorized to bind the team to the contents of this submittal and to negotiate contracts on behalf of PlaceWorks. Please contact Cory Witter or Mark Teague with any questions.
Thank you for this opportunity. We look forward to your response.
Respectfully submitted,
PLACEWORKS
Mark Teague
AICP Cory Witter
Principal, Land Use & Environmental Strategies Senior Associate Principal in Charge Project Manager
916.245.7500 | [email protected] 714.966.9220 x2337 | [email protected]
2. UNDERSTANDING
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 3
2. UNDERSTANDING
What We Know and Why It Matters
The PlaceWorks team has earned a wealth of knowledge and experience by successfully completing development code updates that vary from those seeking legislative consistency to those implementing new land uses guided by a bold vision for the future. It is critical to recognize where a jurisdiction sits on this spectrum before proposing a program that achieves their goal. The following discussion describes PlaceWorks’ understanding of the goals of this focused update based on our due diligence during the preparation of this proposal.
Improving Usability
For many years, PlaceWorks has championed a transition away from cumbersome, monolithic planning documents and guided clients toward more streamlined, user-friendly experiences (both print and web based). We specialize in synthesizing complex materials into a concise package that more clearly conveys the spirit and intent of the original document(s). In the context of development codes, this could entail restructuring often-repetitive permitted uses sections into a single table and/or rephrasing specific standards in a more digestible way.
Understanding that many City staff interact with the code on a daily basis, it is imperative that the updated code be structured in a way that facilitates efficient project review procedures and intuitive navigation.
When staff are comfortable with the code, they are better equipped to communicate otherwise complex zoning issues to members of the community. Ultimately, a more user-friendly code is not only a practical tool, but a demonstration that the City is committed to transparency and to expanding public understanding of how local government functions.
2. Understanding
4 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Encouraging Entrepreneurship
Given its prime location along a major interstate highway and proximity to activity centers down the hill, Hesperia is well positioned to capture business and household growth as it leaves the valley region. The City’s Land Use Element carves out ample acreage for employment- and revenue-generating uses, so it is imperative that the standards and procedures in the existing development code be structured to support the General Plan’s vision. Through the comprehensive development code update effort, the City will have the opportunity to sit down with stakeholders in the development community and discuss how the code can be revised to reduce friction points. By making the development code clearer and more accessible, the City shows that it is open to embracing new development that positively contributes to the Hesperia community.
Safeguarding Sensitive Uses
The City has already seen an uptick in development activity over the last decade and, with the adoption of its recent focused General Plan, has established a framework that ensures new development improves the quality of life that community members already enjoy. Throughout the update process, we heard the importance of protecting neighborhoods, schools, and recreation ar eas from incompatible commercial and industrial development, such as pallet yards. The development code update process will allow the City to address the community’s concerns and ensure that new development is consistent with general plan goals and aligns with the City’s vision for the future.
3. APPROACH TO THE
SCOPE OF WORK
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 5
3. APPROACH TO THE SCOPE OF WORK
Scope of Work
Task 1. Project Kick-off, Management, and Coordination
Task 1.1 Project Kick-off Meeting
The project kick -off meeting is a critical event in shaping a successful development code update. City staff and consultant team members must collaborate effectively if the work plan is to be completed with the desired quality and within the expected time frame and budget. The kick -off meeting allows the project team to:
• Introduce key participants.
• Refine the work program, scope of work, and schedule (confirm desired timelines for milestone deliverables).
• Identify the roles of anticipated stakeholders such as outside agencies, organizations, property owners, and individuals.
• Identify available resources and any current or related projects that must be considered. • Refine communication protocols for the project.
• Address ongoing implementing projects or programs that could potentially affect the project.
The kick-off meeting could also include representatives from other City departments, such as Public Works, Finance, and the City Manager’s Office, among others.
Deliverable(s):
» Preparation for and attendance at kick-off meeting
» Summary notes
Task 1.2 Ongoing Project Management
The project schedule will define the sequence and critical path for performance of work tasks, including document submittal deadlines to the City, City staff review periods, and time frame s for document revisions. This task accounts for the ongoing operational and coordination activities that are essential for keeping a project on schedule and within budget. This task assumes an 18-month schedule and includes activities such as project start- up, minutes and agendas, budget and schedule tracking, and ongoing coordination with the consultant team.
Deliverable(s):
» Project schedule (either in Excel or MS Project)
» Coordination with the City’s designated Project Manager » Subconsultant Coordination
» Review and processing of project invoices
3. Approach to the Scope of Work
6 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Task 1.3 Coordination and Meetings with City Staff
PlaceWorks will participate in twice -monthly meetings with Planning Department staff to coordinate work tasks and deliverable products among our team members and other consultants, review project progress, schedule future tasks, and discuss and identify solutions for any issues impacting the successful performance of the work program. For budgeting purposes, we as sume one in-person and one virtual meeting each month over the course of the project schedule ( up to 36 meetings over a n 18-month schedule). These meetings are intended for communication with the core project team but can be expanded to include additional City and PlaceWorks staff, as necessary .
Deliverable(s):
» Preparation for and attendance at up to 36 meetings (18 in-person, 18 virtual) Task 2. Public Engagement
Task 2.1 Stakeholder Meetings
In our experience, stakeholder interviews conducted soon after project kick- off are one of the best ways for the team to quickly assess perspectives on project issues, opportunities, and challenges as well as to solicit input on the best ways to reach out and involve various members of the community, stakeholder organizations, and the city at large. This is also an opportune time to engage with focus groups who are interested in sharing their input regarding the zoning code update.
PlaceWorks will work with City staff to identify relevant stakeholders and schedule meetings with those groups. Interviews and focus groups help to pinpoint issues, opportunities, and constraints as a means to inform the update. The primary purpose is to c apitalize on participants’ wealth of information, history, institutional knowledge, and understanding of issues. Interviews with outside agencies are also useful for discussing the zoning code, future projects, activities for greater coordination and under standing, and how each will shape or influence the updates.
It is assumed that the meetings will be scheduled over two concurrent days (grouped for efficiency) and could be held in person or virtually with two PlaceWorks staff in attendance.
Deliverable(s):
» Preparation for and attendance of 2 PlaceWorks staff at up to 6 stakeholder interviews » Meeting materials such as presentations, handouts, and summary notes (for posting on website if desired)
Task 2.2 Online Engagement
PlaceWorks will supplement traditional in-person engagement with online tools to broaden accessibility and reach a larger cross-section of Hesperia residents. Our budget assumes content creation for and preparation of one online, self-selected response survey that complements critical discussions at in-person workshops.
The survey can be made available in English and Spanish if desired, and a QR code can be provided for easy access to the survey.
Deliverable(s):
» Online survey (1)
3. Approach to the Scope of Work
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 7
Task 2.3 Community Meetings
In-person public meetings are expected by the public for large -scale planning efforts. PlaceWorks has extensive experience designing and conducting in -person meetings that are meaningful and productive for both City staff and the Hesperia community. We wil l build upon the success of the General Plan Update process to gather input and generate buy -in from a broad range of community members and enable City and consultant staff to more efficiently and personally connect with and engage many individual resident s and stakeholders.
PlaceWorks recommends holding six community workshops concurrent with City Council and/or Planning Commission study sessions to maximize visibility and transparency throughout the update process. This approach was very well received during the General Plan Update because community members were able to share their feedback directly with the City’s decisionmakers and, in turn, could hear decisionmakers’ insights and considerations.
The workshops would be held at key points of the planning process to introduce the project and receive community feedback on zoning concerns as well as feedback on the Public Review Draft Development Code. For each community meeting, PlaceWorks will prepare draft and final materials , including a meeting agenda, sign-in sheet, presentation, open house boards and/or workshop activity, comment cards, and handouts as needed. PlaceWorks will also facilitate the workshop sessions with support from City staff, as necessary.
During the Kick -off Meeting (Task 1.1), the outreach scope and schedule can be refined further to better align with staff’s understanding of the community’s expectations. For purposes of budgeting, PlaceWorks plans to facilitate a total of six meetings/workshops.
PlaceWorks recommends structuring the sessions as follows:
• 1 meeting to review residential uses
• 1 meeting to review commercial uses
• 1 meeting to review industrial uses
• 1 meeting to review permit processing, definitions, and additional minor revisions • 1 floating meeting to review topics requiring additional discussion • 1 meeting to present the draft Development Code
Additional study sessions may be added to the scope and reflected in any necessary budget augments at the request of City staff.
PlaceWorks will prepare necessary materials for the Planning Commission and City Council, including ordinances, presentations, and attachments as needed. This scope assumes that the City will distribute the notices and publish as required by law.
Deliverable(s):
» Preparation for and attendance at up to 6 community workshops and summary notes » Meeting materials such as presentations, handouts, and other related materials
3. Approach to the Scope of Work
8 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Task 2.4 Public Engagement Summaries
PlaceWorks will prepare concise engagement summaries following each community workshop and at the conclusion of each online engagement activity. The summaries will provide a bullet point list of key themes and issues that we heard from the community and decisionmakers and describe how the feedback will inform the Development Code update.
Deliverable(s):
» Engagement summaries (7)
Task 3. Development Code Update
Based on direction from City staff, PlaceWorks will prepare Development Code amendments as identified in the subtasks below.
Task 3.1 Existing Code Review and Best Practice Research PlaceWorks will review and assess the current Development Code (Title 16 and Title 17) against the adopted General Plan,adopted specific plans, and applicable State laws. We will also review staff -identified Development Code concerns or issues that should be addressed as part of the update. Following the assessment of background data, PlaceWorks will conduct a review of best practices to help guide subsequent Development Code update tasks.
Deliverable(s):
» Memorandum summarizing Key Findings
Task 3.2 Administrative Review Draft Development Code Amendments PlaceWorks will prepare the Administrative Review Draft Development Code Amendments for internal review and comment by City staff. The Administrative Draft will demonstrate consistency with the General Plan Update, the 2021-2029 Housing Element , and applicable State laws and will incorporate best practice findings from Task 3.1.
PlaceWorks will also prepare graphics and/or illustrations to be included in the Development Code to better clarify requirements such as height and setbacks.
Based on our experience working alongside staff on the General Plan Update, we anticipate that the Development Code Updates will address, but not necessarily be limited to:
• Reorganization and reformat of Title 16 as needed to ensure that the Development Code is user friendly for the public and staff.
• A comprehensive review of the definitions.
• Examination of the required findings for entitlement applications to determine if additional findings need to be made.
• Addressing nonconforming uses and structures.
• Review of the allowed uses in commercial and industrial zones to better differentiate uses across the three commercial zones and two industrial zones.
• Review of commercial and industrial design materials and configuration.
3. Approach to the Scope of Work
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 9
• Review of the allowed-use table to determine if any changes should be made to the required approval process.
• Additional development regulations for industrial developments that contain outdoor storage. • Review of animal regulations against best practices.
• Review and update of allowed uses within the agricultural and rural residential zoning to bring uses more current and include standards where needed.
• Review of landscape ordinance.
• Modification of the wireless facilities section of the Code to be consistent with federal and State law, addition of regulations for the ongoing maintenance of wireless facilities, and clarification of location requirements.
• Review and revisions to ensure that development standards are clear and easy for the public to understand.
• Ensure compliance with new State laws and Housing Element programs. • Additional new regulations for short-term vacation rentals to limit large gatherings on residential properties.
• Additional new requirements for electric vehicle charging consistent with State law. • Additional new regulations for solar facilities located on commercial properties. • Prepare edits to the Sign Code focusing on design requirements, including materials, architectural features, etc.
PlaceWorks will also review the allowed uses and development standards in the Main Street and Freeway Corridor Specific Plan and determine, in coordination with staff, if there is a need to distinguish them more clearly from the Development Code.
Before preparing the Administrative Review Draft, PlaceWorks will consult with City staff to determine the appropriate file format(s) and preferred tracking procedures to en sure ease of internal use and review. It is assumed that the City will provide a single, consolidate d set of comments following the review.
Task 3.3 Public Review Draft Development Code Amendments Following receipt of consolidated City staff comments, PlaceWorks will prepare a Public Review Draft Development Code that is suitable to be published on the City’s website and presented during the workshops and to the Planning Commission and City Council.
Task 3.4 Revised Draft Development Code Amendments
PlaceWorks will provide the Revised Draft Development Code Amendments to City staff for consideration for adoption. The Revised Draft Development Code Amendments will address any typos or errors and will incorporate a summary of edits and responses to comments on the Public Draft from staff, Planning Commission, City Council, and the publi c.
Task 3.5 Final Development Code Amendments
Following Planning Commission recommendation and City Council adoption hearings, PlaceWorks will prepare the Final Development Code with all revisions in PDF or other preferred format. We assume that the City will be responsible for updating the Development Code website (e.g., Municode) .
3. Approach to the Scope of Work
10 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Deliverable(s):
» Administrative Review Draft Development Code Amendments » Public Review Draft Development Code Amendments
» Revised Draft Development Code Amendments
» Final Development Code Amendments
Task 3.6 Zoning Map Update
PlaceWorks will prepare updated Citywide zoning map(s) and overlay district maps , if necessary, to implement the updated Development Code. Mapping products will be provided in both graphic and GIS - compatible formats.
Deliverable(s):
» Draft and Final zoning maps
» Updated GIS data (map package)
Task 4. Environmental Review
Task 4.1 Addendum
PlaceWorks will prepare an addendum to the General Plan EIR, herein referred to as the “ GP EIR,” to evaluate the Development Code update. This approach to prepare an EIR Addendum is based on the presumption that the proposed Development Code update will be within the scope of and consistent with the General Plan and would therefore not create any new or greater impacts than those identified in the GP EIR. PlaceWorks recommends an addendum rather than a tiered mitigated negative declaration because an addendum is a more legally defensible CEQA document.
The Administrative Draft Addendum will be prepared following a format discussed during the kick -off meeting. Our default format for an Addendum follows the findings in section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines without a lengthy initial study. If an initial study is requested, we will need to increase the budget and scope accordingly. The analysis will be qualitative, meaning that no technical studies will be necessary. A contract modification would be required for any new modeling or major quantitative analysis . One administrative draft will be provided for review.
Using one set of consolidated comments from the City on the administrative Draft Addendum, PlaceWorks will prepare the Final Addendum for use in the Staff Report . This task assumes that comments received on the Screencheck Draft Addendum will be minimal and require minor textual edits or revision. This scope of work also assumes that the Final Addendum will not be circulated for public review ; therefore, a response to comments process and budget is not required. However, we are available to prepare responses to comments and addendum revisions, if requested, for an additional cost.
Deliverable(s):
» Administrative Draft Addendum (Word and PDF)
» Final Addendum (PDF)
3. Approach to the Scope of Work
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 11
Task 4.2 Notice of Determination
PlaceWorks will prepare a Notice of Determination (NOD) for submittal to the County Clerk. If requested, PlaceWorks will submit the NOD to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation’s State Clearinghouse. Our scope assumes that City staff will submit the NOD to the County Clerk and pay all applicable filing fees at the time of posting. The budget does not include payment of any filing fees.
Deliverable(s):
» Notice of Determination (PDF as state form)
Task 5. Adoption Hearings
Task 5.1 Planning Commission
PlaceWorks will attend one session with the Planning Commission to present the draft Development Code for consideration and action. PlaceWorks will prepare and conduct a PowerPoint presentation and answer questions from the commissioners and public. A digital copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be provided in a format suitable for printing and for posting on the City’s website. PlaceWorks can also help prepare staff report content.
Deliverable(s):
» In-person presentations at one session
» Presentation suitable for printing/posting on the internet » Content for staff reports, as necessary
Task 5.2 City Council
PlaceWorks will attend one session with the City Council to present the draft for consideration and action.
PlaceWorks will prepare and conduct a PowerPoint presentation and answer questions from the council members and public. A digital copy of the PowerPoint presentation will be provided in a format suitable for printing and for posting on the City’s website. PlaceWorks can also help prepare staff report content.
Deliverable(s):
» In-person presentations at one session
» Presentation suitable for printing/posting on the internet » Content for staff reports, as necessary
3. Approach to the Scope of Work
12 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Proposed Schedule
PlaceWorks proposes the following schedule to prepare an update to the Hesperia Development Code.
Proposed Schedule
Task Date Due
2026
Project Kick-off February
Administrative Draft Development Code February–June
City Staff Review July–August
Public Review Draft Development Code September–October
City Staff Review November–December
2027
Planning Commission and City Council Adoption Hearings January/February Final Development Code March
4. EXPERIENCE
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 13
4. EXPERIENCE
PlaceWorks
PlaceWorks is one of California’s most eminent planning, design, and environmental consulting firms serving communities. We serve both public- and private-sector clients in the fields of comprehensive planning, urban design, landscape architecture, environ mental analysis, economics, and GIS. We celebrated our 50th anniversary in business last year, and we currently employ a staff of approximately 145 people in six office locations statewide . We have provided similar services since our firm’s inception.
Our broad experience and technical proficiency give us a keen understanding of the complexities of public policies, project designs, environmental compliance, and legal requirements. Our services include, but are not limited to, the following :
Community Planning
• Housing Research and Analysis
• Zoning and Form-Based Code
• Comprehensive Planning, including
General Plans, Specific Plans
• Community Outreach and
Engagement
• Climate Adaptation & Resiliency
• Environmental Justice Planning
• Infill Planning and Design
• Corridor Planning
• TOD Planning
• Geographic Information Systems
• Creative Media
Economics
• Economic and Market Analysis
• Economic Development Planning
• Site Selection and Development
• Feasibility Studies
• Transfer of Development Rights
Design
• Transit-Oriented Design
• Downtown Design and Planning
• Design Standards and Guidelines
• Site Planning
• Large-Scale Planning and Design
• Strategic Plans
Environmental Services
• CEQA/NEPA Documentation
• Tiered Environmental Review:
– Addendums
– Supplemental or Subsequent EIRs
and MNDs
– Project Consistency Reviews
• Third-Party Review
• Technical Studies:
– Air Quality and GHG
– Energy
– Noise, Vibration, and Acoustics
– Hydrology, Water Quality & Supply
– Health Risk Assessments
– Title 5 Risk Studies
– Wildfire and Safety
– Visual Impact Analyses
• Regulatory Compliance
• Scoping Meeting Preparation and
Facilitation
• Community Engagement
Landscape Architecture
• Streetscape Design
• Parks and Trails Planning
• Urban Agriculture and Urban
Forestry
• Storm Water Management
• Evidence-Based Design
Company Information
Type: A California Corporation,
100% Employee Owned
Founded: September 1975
Office Locations
Santa Ana (headquarters)
Los Angeles
Ontario
San Luis Obispo
Berkeley
Sacramento
Primary/Day-to-Day Contact
Project Manager
Cory Witter
Senior Associate
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana CA 92707
714.966.9220 ext. 2337
[email protected]
Website
https://placeworks.com
4. Experience
14 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Relevant Experience
Planning
Zoning and Form -Based Code. PlaceWorks has prepared zoning and form-based code updates and overlays for communities throughout California. These codes are highly customized to each community, and we work closely with clients to identify the approach that will most effectively achieve the jurisdiction’s and community’s objectives. We incorporate best practices and innovative tools from all approaches to zoning, including form- based codes, conventional zoning codes, and performance zoning. Examples include the Crafton Hills College Village Overlay Zone, the Fontana Downtown Overlay District, and the San Bernardino TOD Overlay Zone.
Housing Services and In -Depth Experience with Recent Housing Legislation and HCD. PlaceWorks staff have developed strong and effective working relationships with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) reviewers. Reaching a consensus with HCD is a negotiation process, and we are committed to representing our clients’ best interests in this process. We strive to understand updates to state law and HCD goals and to serve as a liaison between HCD staff and the communities with whi ch we work.
By maintaining close contact with HCD and representing the needs of our clients, we have never failed to obtain certification for any of the housing elements we have prepared. PlaceWorks staff have prepared hundreds of housing elements, including more than 50 adopted housing elements in the 6th cycle alone . Of course, our housing element expertise extends to the many recent State law changes, including accessory dwelling units, sites for lower income households that have been included in more than two housing element land inventories, analysis of local efforts to address nongovernmental constraints, and new analysis requirements for underutilized or vacant sites. We work directly with HCD on the interpretation of new housing laws, and we provide housing law guidance to the various jurisdictions we work for.
City of Barstow General Plan Update
& EIR
San Bernardino TOD Overlay Zone
4. Experience
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 15
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The PlaceWorks Housing Tea m has extensive experience implementing housing elements. One example is our work for the City of Soledad, which included updating the zoning ordinance and developing an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) handbook. The work was funded by a Senate Bill 2 Planning Grant. Soledad is a small agricultural city in Monterey County, located near Pinnacles National Park. The team’s work on the update included updating the zoning code in a variety of areas to be consistent with state housing legislation and providing an ADU handbook for the city. The team also facilitated the adoption of the zoning amendments through the city’s public hearing process and prepare d the applicable CEQA analysis pertaining to the required amendments.
4. Experience
16 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Urban Design. Some communities need updates to standards for new kinds of housing, like small lot single family, which reach a wider segment of the marketplace. PlaceWorks helps envision opportunity areas in communities and has helped develop different urban design concepts that respond to community needs and are market feasible.
This is particularly important when commun ities are resistant to change and require powerful visuals to convey the right messages. We help inform and engage community members on density, housing products, the change in retail, urban form, and the importance of rethinking streets. Embedded in all o ur urban planning and design work is placemaking. We have crafted objective design standards and model ordinances and assisted cities across the state to adopt them into their zoning codes. Our broad experience and technical proficiency have given us a kee n understanding of the complexities of public policy, project design, and legal requirements. Our design work includes WRCOG Objective Design Standards Toolkit, WRCOG SB 9 Toolkit, and San Bernardino (City) Downtown Specific Plan.
4. Experience
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 17
Corridor Planning and Design. Communities need financial tools and growth opportunities to reclaim corridors and reweave them into the neighborhood fabric. At the forefront of corridor revitalization, PlaceWorks creates new solutions to reposition commercial corridors with the mix of land uses that best competes in the local and regional economies. With our long history of working with the general public, private developers, and businesses, we know how to combine the right community - and market-driven design solutions to address multimodal transportation options, the built environment, economics, and community health. From design to implementation, we identify both new and proven economic development strategies and funding mechanisms to begin implementing t he plan immediately.
Environmental Services
PlaceWorks has over five decades of experience in environmental planning, with a long -term perspective and technical expertise in shaping responses to the dynamic state and federal regulatory environment. We have managed a wide range of project sizes and types, and our reputation is built on our consistent production of effective and defensible environmental documents.
Good environmental analysis doesn’t just tally up impacts but finds opportunities to address and solve serious environmental concerns.
We use our expertise to formulate workable plans and programs while remaining objective to ensure environmental documenta tion withstands legal scrutiny.
Environmental Strategists. We view ourselves as a client’s environmental strategist, and because CEQA is California’s broadest environmental law and a rapidly changing landscape, it is critical to have a deep understanding of the process and legal requirements. We continually monito r case law, legislative proposals, and regulatory guidance, integrating this information to provide the highest level of legal integrity. Our senior staff adds value to our services with decades of CEQA and NEPA experience. We translate this expertise into a variety of publications —including our “A Practical Guide to the California Environmental Quality Act” —to make the procedural and substantive requirements of CEQA accessible to decision makers and the public.
The Right Level of Analysis. PlaceWorks understands each project is unique—in both its physical and political context— and we have the experience and skills to identify when projects may be subject to CEQA and/or NEPA. We know the right questions to ask to move Highland Base Line Corridor Study (including 3D
fly-through. We also prepared Highland Sign
Ordinance illustrations and graphics.
4. Experience
18 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update toward the right CEQA, NEPA, or joint CEQA/NEPA documentation and process. Our first course of action is always to determine whether any categorical exclusions (NEPA) or categorical exemptions (CEQA) apply to the project. Taking advantage of exclusions and exemptions helps us to optimize efficiencies and reduce redundancies while ensuring legal defensibility for our documents. If no exclusions or exemptions apply, the next step is to determine whether an individual or joint CEQA/NEPA document is required. If a joint document, we have the experience to scope our work for technical studies/analyses that provide the required analysis under both CEQA and NEPA without overkill or redundancy.
4. Experience
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 19
Team Organization
Below is an organizational chart demonstrating the project team members for this effort , followed by brief biographies. Resumes for all staff may be found after the biographies.
4. Experience
20 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update Brief Biographies
MARK TEAGUE AICP | Principal, Land Use & Environmental Strategies Principal in Charge
In over 35 years of public - and private-sector experience, Mark Teague has worked throughout California in
agencies large and small and is considered an innovative problem solver. His projects include planned
communities, shopping center EIRs, general plan and zoning code updates, impact fees, and public outreach for projects highly scrutinized by the public. Mark is often able to offer a unique approach to meeting a critical goal of a
project. His experience as a planning
director, staff liaison, and ability to see
the whole of the project, ensures that
every document meets the need of the
client. He has served as on -call
extension of staff for numerous cities in
California including Wildomar ,
Beaumont, and Eastvale. His Zoning
experience includes a comprehensive update of the City of Temple City’s Zoning Code, updates and zoning s ervices for the City of Wildomar, and zoning advisory services for Envision Contra Costa 2040 General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, Zoning Code, and EIR project.
CORY WITTER | Senior Associate
Project Manager
Cory Witter’s background in public health and
community-based participatory research adds to his
unique perspective on the planning world. His wide
project experience so far has just intensified his passion for long-range planning, economic development, and community engagement. He views planning
dilemmas as an intersection of the
social and physical environments and
chooses to search upstream for
solutions rather than downstream —
to fix the causes of problems instead of just their effects. Cory’s recent experience includes serving as project manager for the Hesperia General Plan Update and assistant project manager on the Barstow General Plan Update. He also assisted with multiple 6th -cycle housing elements in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. He is and Zoning Code Update
City of Temple City Comprehensive Zoning
Code Update, led by Mark Teague AICP
4. Experience
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 21
currently working with multiple jurisdictions to evaluate and adopt inclusionary housing ordinances.
CYNTHIA WALSH | Senior Associate
As-Needed Zoning Advisor
Cynthia Walsh has almost 20 years of experience
working on long -range planning documents, specializing in policy writing for housing element updates, housing
element annual reports, and housing element
implementation. She also has experience with comprehensive Zoning Code and General Plan updates. Some of her work includes Housing Elements for Riverside County, Wildomar, Eastvale, La Habra Heights, California City, Imperial County, and many other cities and counties.
Other recent work includes Title 17 Development Code
Comprehensive Update for the City of Wildomar; and housing element zoning implementation for Stockton, Benicia, Dixon, Solano County, Gonzales, and Lafayette. She is currently assisting with Comprehensive Zoning Code updates for Yuba City and the Town of Pa radise, zoning text amendments to comply with State law for the City of Gridley, and Housing Element updates for the City of South Lake Tahoe and the newly incorporated city of Mountain House.
ANDREW DAVIDOV | Associate
Assistant Project Manager
Andrew Davidov will provide zoning planning support .
Andrew specializes in every step of comprehensive
zoning code updates. His areas of expertise include
designing and implementing community engagement
plans, analyzing land use regulations, and crafting precise code language. Andrew interprets existing land uses and standards, aligns them with government regulations, and develops new policies and standards for zoning code updates. His projects have inclu ded writing comprehensive zoning code updates, form -based codes, and objective design standards in compliance with California law. Andrew helped write targeted zoning code amendments align with community goals and California law, create a form -based code for a Highway 111 Specific Plan for La Quinta and draf ted code amendments based on projected housing and transportation needs for Park City, Utah. He also has supported overhauling and writing new objective design standards for Glendora, Millbrae, and Piedmont . He is currently serving as the A ssistant Project Manager for the Contra Costa County and San Mateo comprehensive zoning code updates.
4. Experience
22 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update ALAN LOOMIS AICP | Principal, Urban Design
Advisor, Objective Design Standards
Alan Loomis will serve as the ODS Advsior for this effort.
Alan Loomis is an award -winning urban designer,
planner and educator. As Principal of Urban Design in
PlaceWorks’ downtown LA office, Alan is responsible for leading our regional urban design practice while playing a role in projects throughout California. A 15 -year veteran of City Hall, Alan has directed a wide range of urban design -based policy projects leading multi-disciplinary teams through an equally wide range of public outreach programs. As City Urban Designer for Santa Monica Alan was the City’s lead for Promenade 3.0, a comprehensive redesign proposal of the iconic Third Street Promenade. Before Santa Monica, Alan led the urban design program for the City of Glendale for 12 years.
Starting in 2005 as the City’s first on -staff urban designer, and later as deputy director of the Community Development Department, he built an award-winning planning team that managed design review, historic preservation, citywide planning, and mobility programs. Alan has led and developed objective design standards for numerous jurisdictions, including the cities of Hesperia, Murrieta, Temecula Glendora, Wildomar, and Anaheim.
ROB MAZUR | Associate Principal
GIS Advisor
Rob Mazur will serve as GIS lead for this effort. Rob has extensive experience creating maps and datasets for a
range of planning projects. He specializes in all facets of geodatabase development, data management, web GIS,
and spatial and tabular analyses for improved decision -making, information retrieval, and cartography. His experience in a wide variety of planning projects, coupled with his expertise in GIS and field data collection, make him a key asset to any team. Rob excels at qualitative and quantitative spatial analysis, including buildout calculations, walkability, community health modeling, cartography, web application development, and land use scenario modeling. He works directly with clients and staff to develop effective, efficient, and informative GIS processes. Relevant project experience includes leading GIS services for general plan updates for the Cities of Barstow, Hesperia, and Wildomar.
4. Experience
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 23
CHRIS HAZEL | Project Planner
GIS Analysis & Mapping Design
Chris Hazel will conduct GIS analysis and mapping design for this effort. Chris has a decade of experience in
housing and community development, ranging through
the industry of building and social sciences. His
concentration is on affordable and fair housing, and he advocates for creating community equity. He has worked in the public sector upholding housing standards, in the academic sector performing research and compiling housing educational archives, and in the private sector creating technical tools a nd reports to support housing planning policy. Chris practices polytechnical community building, incorporating GIS spatial analysis with outreach, quantitative research, graphic storytelling, design, and fabrication. Relevant projects in Chris’s portfolio include GIS and mapping analysis for the Hesperia Transit Access Spatial Analysis project, the Lake County Housing Action and Implementation Plan, the TCAC Housing Development Tool, and statewide 7th Cycle Rural Housing Element program planning and affordably furthering fair housing ( AFFH) maps.
HAZEL CHOI | Project Planner
Graphic Design
Hazel Choi will provide graphic design support. Hazel has experience in comprehensive and long -range planning,
with a specific focus on policy development for housing element updates. She has been contributing to updating
housing elements to achieve certification for various local jurisdictions throughout California.
Hazel also has expertise in preparing and updating zoning code amendments to ensure compliance with the recent state law changes for various local jurisdictions. She is committed to supporting cities and counties in successfully implementing their programs, helping them achieve their goals while meeting state requirements. Hazel has actively participated in numerous community outreach and surveys, dedicating her time to creating a range of visual materials that enhance the community’s understanding of vario us projects.
JASMINE OSMAN | Senior Associate
CEQA Project Manager
Jasmine Osman will serve as Project Manager for the
environmental component of this effort . Jasmine’s
particular interests in the planning profession include law, social equity, and the environment. At PlaceWorks, she assists both the planning and environmental teams on a wide
4. Experience
24 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update range of projects for public - and private-sector clients—from industrial and residential developments to school facilities, parks and public works projects, specific plans, and general plan updates. With over eight years of CEQA experience and a CEQA Practice certificate from the UC San Di ego Extension, Jasmine mostly assists the environmental team with managing projects and preparing CEQA analyses and documentation. As a senior project manager, she is skilled at coordinating efforts between clients, subconsultants, and the internal PlaceWorks team while ensuring projects are delivered on time, within budget, and of a high quality. Her organizational skills and attention to detail have proven beneficial for all. Jasmine’s experience includes working on general plan and housing element updates for the cities of Hesperia, Barstow, Wildomar, and Corona.
LEXIE ZIMNY | Associate
CEQA Planner
Lexie Zimny will provide environmental planning
support. Lexie is a sharp and focused environmental
planner whose passion in planning stems from a desire
to help clients make well- informed and inclusive
decisions about communities, and whose alacrity in learning new skills and processes makes her a highly versatile team member. She is adept at finding creative and accessible ways to communicate complex information. Lexie’s responsibilities include research, writing, and coordination with team members, clients, and subconsultants for projects of all types. Her exp erience includes environmental analysis for more than a dozen general plan projects statewide and a wide variety of other project types including school facilities, annexation, parks, solar energy, and staff services projects. Lexie has provided air quality, GHG, and energy technical servies on numerous projects for the cities of Hesperia, Riverside, and Wildomar.
City of Hesperia General Plan Land Use Map
MARK TEAGUE AICP
Principal Advisor, Land Use and Environmental Strategies
EDUCATION
• BA, Political Science, California
State University, Stanislaus
CERTIFICATIONS
• American Institute of Certified
Planners #019631
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
• Association of Environmental
Professionals
Team member since 2016
In over 35 years of public- and private-sector experience, Mark has worked throughout California in agencies large and small and is considered an innovative problem solver. His projects include planned communities, shopping center EIRs, general plan and zoning code updates, impact fees, and public outreach for projects highly scrutinized by the public. Mark is often able to offer a unique approach to meeting a critical goal of a project. His experience as a planning director, staff liaison, and ability to see the whole of the project, ensures that every document meets the need of the client. He has served as on- call extension of staff for numerous cities throughout northern and southern California including Anderson, Mount Shasta, Wildomar and Eastvale.
Mark is also an excellent public speaker and regularly presents at the League of California Cities Planning Commissioner’s Academy on topics such as design guidelines, CEQA compliance, and how to read an EIR. He also teaches planning to staff with a focus on how new legal decisions affect daily activity. Because of his public outreach skills, Mark has helped with projects ranging from Walmart to water-bottling plants and conducted town hall meetings about development services department efficiencies and increases in utility fees.
With a great deal of experience in smaller communities, Mark has experience using available resources to meet the clients needs. Small agencies have the same issues to resolve as larger agencies, what they lack is resources. Using previously prepared studies, data collected for several projects and from different sources as a resource to complete tasks. By talking with the community about an issue, Mark is often able to arrive at solutions using information the agency has already paid for.
He is known for recommending solutions that are less expensive and in tune with the community.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• SB 2 and LEAP/REAP Technical Assistance | Statewide CA • River Crossing Market Place Specific Plan EIR | Redding CA • Redding General Plan Circulation and Noise Element and EIR | Redding CA • Addendum to Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan EIR | Dixon CA • Loomis General Plan Housing and Land Use Element Update| Loomis CA • Colfax General Plan and Housing Element Update | Colfax CA • Yuba City General Plan Update | Yuba City CA
• Elk Grove Kammerer Road Annexation Area| Elk Grove CA • Davis Core Area Plan and EIR | Davis CA
MARK TEAGUE
Principal Advisor
[email protected]
• Envision Contra Costa 2040 General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, Zoning Code Update, and EIR | Contra Costa County CA
• Greentree Mixed-Use Development Project | Vacaville CA • Lincoln Housing Element Update Environmental | Lincoln CA • Lodi General Plan EIR | Lodi CA
• Barstow General Plan EIR and General Consulting Services | Barstow CA • Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update and EIR | Rancho Cucamonga CA • On-Call Environmental Services | Beaumont CA
• City Planner | Weed CA
• Temple City General Plan Update EIR | Temple City CA
• Temple City Development Code Update | Temple City CA
• North School Reconstruction EIR | Hermosa Beach CA
• John Killen/Fox Luggage Warehouse Project IS/MND | Industry CA • Residential Care Facility Specific Plan IS/EIR | Solana Beach CA
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• CEQA Basics | 2024 League of California Cities Planning Commissioners Academy | Long Beach, CA
• Planning Commissioners Training | 2024 Inland Empire APA Riverside • Perfect Mitigation Measures | 2024 California Association of Environmental Planners Anaheim
• Policy Implications of Planning | 2024 New Councilmembers and Mayors Academy Monterey
ACTIVITIES
• Engineering, Environment Planning Internship Chareete (EEPIC) Lead for PlaceWorks
AWARDS
• Envision Wildomar 2040 | 2025 Daniel Burnham Award of Merit for a Comprehensive Plan, California APA, Inland Empire Section
CORY WITTER
Senior Associate
Cory’s background in public health and community-based participatory research adds to his unique perspective on the planning world. His wide project experience so far has just intensified his passion for long-range planning, economic development, and community engagement. He views planning dilemmas as an intersection of the social and physical environments and chooses to search upstream for solutions rather than downstream—to fix the causes of problems instead of just their effects. To add to his experience and abilities with comprehensive planning projects, especially general plans, Cory is venturing further into the field of land use economics. He is interested in economic growth and development—particularly in how all the pieces fit together so that cities can make land use decisions with lasting social and economic benefits.
Cory’s recent experience includes serving as project manager for the Barstow General Plan Update and assistant project manager on the Fountain Valley General Plan Update. He also assisted with multiple 6th-cycle housing elements in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. He is currently working with multiple jurisdictions to evaluate and adopt inclusionary housing ordinances.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Comprehensive Planning
• Dana Point General Plan Update | Dana Point CA
• Hesperia Focused Gener
al Plan Update | Hesperia CA
• Bars
tow General Plan Update and EIR | Barstow CA
• Needles Land Use and Circula
tion Element Update | Needles CA
• San Bernardino Coun
tywide Plan and EIR | County of San Bernardino CA
• Corona Gener
al Plan Update and EIR | Corona CA
• Colton Gener
al Plan Safety Element and Local Hazard Mitigation Plan | Colton CA
• Foun
tain Valley General Plan Update | Fountain Valley CA
• Redondo Beach F
ocused General Plan Update and EIR | Redondo Beach CA
• Sant
a Ana General Plan Update and EIR | Santa Ana CA
• Dana Poin
t Housing and Safety Elements Update | Dana Point CA
• Anaheim General Plan Upda
te | Anaheim CA
Economic Plans
• Inclusionary Housing F ee Study | Calimesa CA
• WRC
OG SED Analysis: Socioeconomic Data Allocation, Comparison, and Distribution | Western Riverside County CA
• Missing Middle Housing Analysis | Elk Gr
ove CA
• Wes
tern Riverside Council of Governments’ “EXPERIENCE” Feasibility Study | Riverside County CA
• Wes
tern Riverside Council of Governments SCAG RTP/SCS Data Review | Riverside County CA
• Dev
elopment Impact Fee Study for Midtown Long Beach | Long Beach CA • Community Pr
ofile and Environmental Scan | Torrance CA
EDUCATION
• Master of Urban and Regional
Planning
, University of California,
Irvine
• BA
, Public Health Policy, University
of California, Irvine
• Certifica
tes from the International
Association for Public Participation
» Planning for E
ffective Public
Participation
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
Team member since 2017
CORY WITTER
Senior Associate
[email protected]
Other Projects
• Marina del Re y for All Comprehensive Plan | Los Angeles County CA • Southeast Long Beach Specific Plan and EIR | Long Beach CA • The El Camino Plan (Corridor Plan) | At
ascadero CA
• Cent
ennial (Tejon Ranch) Specific Plan | Lebec CA
• Caltrans Sus
tainable Communities Grant Assistance | Glendale CA
• OCT
A’s Orange County Active Transportation Plan | Orange County CA • Irwindale Nonmot
orized Active Transportation Plan | Irwindale CA
• Caltrans Cy
cle 4 Active Transportation Program Grant Assistance | Long Beach CA
• Laguna Beach Hazar
ds Mitigation Plan | Laguna Beach CA
AWARDS
• Needles Land Use and Tr ansportation Elements | 2023 Comprehensive Plan Award of Excellence, APACA-IE
• Excellence in R
esearch, Program in Public Health, UC Irvine, 2017
• Acad
emic Excellence, Department of Planning, Policy & Design, UC Irvine, 2018 • Service A
ward, Department of Planning, Policy & Design, UC Irvine, 2018
LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNITY
• President, Urban Planning Student Association (APA student chapter), UC Ir
vine
• Volun
teer, KidWorks Inc., Santa Ana CA
CYNTHIA WALSH
Senior Associate II
EDUCATION
• BA, Urban Studies and Planning San
Francisco State University
• Section 3 HUD Training
• Davis-Bacon Labor “Prevailing Wage
Law” Course
Team member since 2018
Cynthia Walsh has almost 20 years’ experience working on long-range planning documents, specializing in policy writing for housing element updates, housing element annual reports, and Housing Element implementation. She prepared housing elements during the 4 th through
7th cycles and has worked closely with staff at the California Department of Housing and Community Development to achieve certification for her clients. She also has experience with comprehensive zoning code and General Plan updates.
Cynthia also has experience with preparation of analyses of impediments to fair housing choice documents, consolidated plans, and action plans. She is experienced with State and federal grant programs, and she is well versed in federal (Davis-Bacon) and state labor standards compliance.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
7th Cycle Housing Elements
• City of Tehama
• Tehama County
• Modoc County
• Loyalton
6th Cycle Housing Elements
• Solano County Multijurisdictional
Housing Element
• Fresno County Multijurisdictional
Housing Element
• Orinda
• Alameda
• Daly City
• Cupertino
• Loomis
• Lincoln
• Rocklin
• Rancho Cordova
• Placer County
• El Dorado County
• Colfax
• Auburn
• Wildomar
• Imperial County
• Eastvale
• Calaveras County
• Elk Grove
• Willits
• Mendocino County
• Santa Rosa
• Windsor
• San Joaquin County
• Weed
• Town of Fort Jones
• California City
• 5th Cycle Housing Elements
• Imperial County
• Butte County
• Riverside County
• Auburn,
• Calimesa,
• Eastvale,
• Holtville,
• Marysville,
• Ontario,
• Temecula,
• West Sacramento,
• Wildomar,
• Willits
• Trinidad
CYNTHIA WALSH
Senior Associate
[email protected]
4th Cycle Housing Elements
• Riverside County
• Alameda,
• Fortuna,
• Oxnard,
• Rancho Cordova
• Willits
• Solano County
• Arcata,
• Biggs,
• Chico,
• Cloverdale,
• Crescent City,
• Dixon,
• Eastvale,
• Hughson,
• Imperial,
• Ione,
• Los Altos,
• Montague,
• Monterey,
• Plymouth,
• Rancho Cordova,
• Sand City,
• Tulelake,
• Vallejo,
• Wildomar,
• Willits,
• Willows,
• Yountville
• Kern County
• Morro Bay
Housing Element Update Assistance
• King City
• Gonzales
• Westmorland
• La Habra Heights
• Westlake Village
Zoning Ordinance Amendments
• Comprehensive Update to the Wildomar Development Code, Wildomar, CA Additional Projects
• Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice | Contra Costa Consortium; cities of Fairfield, Hanford, Lodi, Monterey, Rancho Cordova, Rocklin CA
• Consolidated Plans and Action Plans | Contra Costa Consortium; cities of Lancaster, Monterey, Redwood City, Santa Monica CA; State of Arizona; State of Nevada
• Housing Condition Surveys | Imperial County; cities of Grass Valley, Fairfield, Fort Bragg, Vallejo CA
• Income Surveys for Unincorporated Areas of Calexico, Holtville, Heber | Imperial County CA
• Redevelopment Blight Assessment | Plymouth CA
• Kern Council of Governments Regional Housing Needs Plan and Data Report | Kern County CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Housing Elements
• 2008–2013 Housing Elements, Riverside County; cities of Alameda, Fortuna, Oxnard, Rancho Cordova, Willits CA
• 2009–2014 Housing Elements, Solano County; cities of Arcata, Biggs, Chico, Cloverdale, Crescent City, Dixon, Eastvale, Hughson, Imperial, Ione, Los Altos, Montague, Monterey, Plymouth, Rancho Cordova, Sand City, Tulelake, Vallejo, Wildomar, Willits, Willows, ad Yountville CA
• 2013–2021 Housing Elements, Imperial County; Butte County; Riverside County; cities of Auburn, Calimesa, Eastvale, Holtville, Marysville, Ontario, Roseville, Temecula, West Sacramento, Wildomar, Willits CA
ANDREW DAVIDOV
Associate
Andrew is a multiskilled associate on PlaceWorks’ Community Planning team whose background in nonprofit program management and community engagement informs his policy, research, and analytical skills by centering local communities in the planning field. His direct service experience with housing, food, and legal services informs policy and planning solutions to communities’ identified needs through zoning code updates, housing implementation, and economic development and market analysis projects.
Andrew works on projects throughout California, focusing primarily on policy planning, land use analysis, zoning code updates, and economic development. His responsibilities include research and writing for general and specific plan updates, updating zoning codes through comprehensive revisions and targeted amendments, analyzing housing policies, providing technical assistance, and facilitating community engagement. He brings four years of technical experience analyzing the land use needs of communities and developing policies and regulations to achieve community goals and objectives.
Andrew specializes in every step of comprehensive zoning code updates.
His areas of expertise include designing and implementing community engagement plans, analyzing land use regulations, and crafting precise code language. Andrew interprets existing land uses and standards, aligns them with government regulations, and develops new policies and standards for zoning code updates. His projects have included writing comprehensive zoning code updates, form-based codes, and objective design standards in compliance with California law. His project experience spans California, Utah, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Andrew helped write targeted zoning code amendments align with community goals and California law, create a form-based code for a Highway 111 Specific Plan for La Quinta and drafted code amendments based on projected housing and transportation needs for Park City, Utah. He also has supported overhauling and writing new objective design standards for Glendora, Millbrae, and Piedmont.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Zoning Code Updates
• Glendora Objective Design Standards | Glendora CA
• La Habra Heights Zoning Code Amendments | La Habra Heights CA • Norwalk Density Bonus Ordinance | Norwalk CA
• Fresno County Zoning Code Amendments | Fresno County CA • Coalinga Zoning Code Amendments | Coalinga CA
EDUCATION
• Master of Urban Planning,
Environmental Planning & Analysis
Concentration, University of
Southern California
• Master of Public Administration,
University of Southern California
• BA, English, Rhetoric, and Global
Cultures, State University of New
York at Binghamton
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
• American Society of Adaptation
Professionals
Team member since 2024
ANDREW DAVIDOV
Associate
[email protected]
• Contra Costa County Comprehensive Zoning Code Update | Contra Costa County CA
• Firebaugh Zoning Code Amendments | Firebaugh CA
• Fort Jones Zoning Code Amendments | Fort Jones CA
• Gonzales Zoning Code Amendments | Gonzales CA
• Huron Zoning Code Amendments | Huron CA
• King City Zoning Code Amendments | King City CA
• Pittsburg Comprehensive Zoning Code Update | Pittsburg CA • Salinas Comprehensive Zoning Code Update | Salinas CA • San Mateo Comprehensive Zoning Code Update | San Mateo CA • San Mateo High Density Zoning Districts Implementation | San Mateo CA • Santa Rosa Zoning Code Amendments | Santa Rosa CA
• Selma Zoning Code Amendments | Selma CA
• Tuolumne County Small Lot Subdivision Ordinance | Tuolumne County CA • Westmorland Zoning Code Amendments | Westmorland CA
• Yountville Zoning Code Amendments | Yountville CA
General Plans Updates
• Inglewood General Plan Update | Inglewood CA
• Barstow General Plan Update and EIR | Barstow CA
• San Bernardino General Plan Update and EIR | San Bernardino CA Housing Technical Assistance
• Ventura Council of Governments Prohousing Designation Program Application | Ventura County CA
• Western Riverside Council of Governments Prohousing Designation Program Application | Riverside County CA
• HCD Guide to Exemptions from the Standard Surplus Land Act Process | Statewide CA
• HCD Prohousing Designation Calculator Assessments | Statewide CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
Zoning Code Updates and Design Standards
• Objective Design Standards | Portola Valley CA
• Objective Residential Design Standards and Zoning Code Amendments | Millbrae CA
• Highway 111 Specific Plan Form-Based Code | La Quinta CA • Industrial Zone Standards | Norco CA
• Zoning Code Updates | Beaumont, Indio, Seal Beach, Rancho Cucamonga, Palmdale, Portola Valley, South San Francisco, Woodland, Napa, St. Helena CA • Citywide Parking Standards | Belmont CA
• Mixed-Use and Multifamily Objective Design Standards | Piedmont CA • Mixed-Use District Regulations and Objective Design Standards | Saratoga CA • Monterey Corridor Form-Based Code | Morgan Hill CA
Housing Element Updates and Housing Implementation
• 6th Cycle Housing Element Updates | Beaumont, Coachella, Seal Beach, Los Altos, Novato, Piedmont, Pleasanton, Richmond, Santa Maria, Tehachapi, and the County of Alameda CA
• Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Feasibility Testing | Cypress CA • SB 9 & ADU Ordinances | Long Beach CA
ALAN LOOMIS AICP
Principal, Urban Design
Alan Loomis is an award-winning urban designer, planner and educator.
As Principal of Urban Design in PlaceWorks’ downtown LA office, Alan is responsible for leading our regional urban design practice while playing a role in projects throughout California.
A 15-year veteran of City Hall, Alan has directed a wide range of urban design-based policy projects leading multi-disciplinary teams through an equally wide range of public outreach programs. As City Urban Designer for Santa Monica Alan was the City’s lead for Promenade
3 .0, a comprehensive
redesign proposal of the iconic Third Street Promenade. Before Santa Monica, Alan led the urban design program for the City of Glendale for 12 years. Starting in 2005 as the City’s first on-staff urban designer, and later as deputy director of the Community Development Department, he built an award-winning planning team that managed design review, historic preservation, citywide planning, and mobility programs.
Alan is a frequent speaker and tour guide on Los Angeles history and urbanism. He has participated in ULI TAP panels, sat on juries for APA Awards and the City of Los Angeles “LA Lights the Way” design competition, and served on interview panels to select new planners, urban designers and architects for the cities of Los Angeles, Pasadena, Santa Monica, and Santa Ana, among others. From 2014 to 2020 he also served on the Pasadena Design Commission.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• Glendora Station Area Plan | Glendora CA
• Down
town Shoreline Specific Plan and EIR | Long Beach CA
• Artesia Do
wntown Specific Plan and EIR | Artesia CA
• Glendora Meda A
venue Plaza Urban Design | Glendora CA
• San Bernardino Do
wntown Specific Plan, as part of the City’s General Plan Update | San Bernardino CA
• Hesperia General Plan Upda
te Objective Design Standards| Hesperia CA
• Los Alamitos T
own Center Strategic Plan | Los Alamitos CA
• Temecula Old T
own Parklets | Temecula CA
• Objective Design St
andards for:
» Wes
tern Riverside Council of Governments
» Orang
e County Council of Governments
» Anaheim CA
» Glendora CA
» Temecula CA
» Menifee CA
» Murriet
a CA
» Norc
o CA
• On-Call Design Services f
or:
» Rancho Cucamong
a (Urban Design)
» Sant
a Clarita (Urban Design and Architecture)
» Wildomar (Archit
ecture)
• Community Design for:
» The Ont
ario Plan | Ontario CA
» Eas
tvale 2040 General Plan Update | Eastvale CA
» Foun
tain Valley 2040 General Plan Update | Fountain Valley CA
EDUCATION
• MA, Architecture, Southern
Calif
ornia Institute of Architecture
• BA
, Religious Studies / Theology,
University of Detroit, Mercy
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
• Los Angeles F
orum for Architecture
and Urban Design
LEADERSHIP & COMMUNITY
• Facilities and Technology
Committ
ee, Mayfield Junior School,
Pasadena CA, 2024-present
• Board of Advisor
s, Woodbury
University School of Architecture,
2019–2023
•
Juror
, “LA Lights the Way” Design
Competition | City of Los Angeles,
2020
•
Juror
, APA California Awards, 2020
• Member, P
asadena Design Review
Commission, 2014–2020
• Member, Glendale Arts Mas
ter Plan
Task Force, 2017–2018
• Member, P
asadena Civic Center
Task Force, 2017–2018
• Commission Chair, P
asadena Design
Review Commission, 2016–2017
Team member since 2020
ALAN LOOMIS
Principal, Urban Design
[email protected]
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• Promenade 3.0, Vision Plan | Santa Monica CA
• South Glendale Community Plan, Comprehensiv
e General Plan Policies and
Design Guidelines | Glendale CA
• North Glendale Community Plan, Comprehensiv
e General Plan Policies and
Design Guidelines | Glendale CA
• Glendale Down
town Mobility Study, Comprehensive Transit, Parking, and Transportation Plan | Glendale CA
• Glendale Down
town Specific Plan, Urban Design Plan, Guidelines, and Zoning Standards | Glendale CA
• Down
town Newhall Specific Plan, Transit-Oriented District | Santa Clarita CA
PUBLICATIONS
• “The Americana at Brand,” in SAH Archipedia, University of Virginia Press, 2018 • “Panel: Dingba
t as an Urban Typology,” in Dingbat 2.0: The Iconic Los Angeles Apartment as Projection of a Metropolis, Doppelhouse Press, 2016 • “Glen
dale’s Downtown Specific Plan,” in Planning Los Angeles, Planners Press, 2012 • “Stree
tscapes,” Form & Landscape, online “Pacific Standard Time” exhibit at pstp.edison.com, May 2013
• “The Once and Futur
e Mall,” Forum Annual 2004, LA Forum for Architecture
& Urban Design, 2004
• “Down b
y the River,” arcCA 4.03, Winter 2003/04
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• “Crafting Residential Objective Development Standards” panel| AP-OC and Plan
ning Directors’ Association of Orange County, Tustin CA , March 16, 2023 • “Al Fr
esco 2.0: Long-Term Solutions” online panel | ULI-LA, October 18, 2022 • “Ob
jective Design: A New Oxymoron?” panel | APA-OC, May 2021 • Podc
ast: “Human City,” December 17, 2020
• Radio: “Pr
omenade 3.0” appearance on DnA: Design and Architecture, KCRW
89.9 fm, September 3, 2019
• Podc
ast: “Archinect Next Up: Arroyo Seco Weekend,” June 24, 2017 • “City of Gard
ens” panel | 2016 APA-CA Conference, Pasadena CA
• “Bey
ond the Freeway” panel | 2016 APA-CA Conference, Pasadena CA • “Labora
tory for Modernity, Los Angeles, 1940-1990” | Pacific Standard Time Presents, Pasadena CA, 2013
• “New Urbanism and the Compr
ehensive Plan” panel | 2008 APA National
Conference, Las Vegas NV
• “Crea
ting Form-Based Comprehensive Plans” panel | 2008 16th Congress for New Urbanism, Austin TX
• “Implementing F
orm-Based Codes” panel | 2007 15th Congress for New
Urbanism, Philadelphia PA
• Radio: “A park on t
op of a freeway?” appearance on Take Two, KPCC 89.3 fm, March 15, 2016
• Podc
ast: “Curating the City: Urban Designer Alan Loomis on Archinect Sessions One-to-One #12,” February 22, 2016
• Video: “UNIQL
O LA: Urban Designer Alan Loomis” interview | UNIQLO, July 7, 2014 AWARDS
• 2018 LA Conser vancy Preservation Award | Glendale Central Library Renovation • 2016 ASLA Southern
California Merit Award | Space 134 Vision Plan (Fwy Cap Park) • 2015 Implement
ation Award of Excellence, Large Jurisdiction | APA CA | Glendale Downtown Specific Plan / Mobility Study
ROBERT MAZUR
Associate Principal, Director of GIS
Rob has extensive experience creating maps and datasets for a range of planning projects. He specializes in all facets of geodatabase development, data management, web GIS, and spatial and tabular analyses for improved decision-making, information retrieval, and cartography. His experience in a wide variety of planning projects, coupled with his expertise in GIS and field data collection, make him a key asset to any team. Rob excels at quantitative and spatial analysis, including buildout calculations, walkability, community health modeling, cartography, and land use scenario modeling. He works directly with clients and staff to develop effective, efficient, and informative GIS processes.
Rob is well versed in advanced and current planning practices in both the public and private sector, and has an excellent understanding of the relationship between data management and its importance in achieving service delivery standards for the work of community development and public works departments. Rob has brought his GIS skills to a number of general plan updates throughout California, and has managed a variety of mapping projects in Los Angeles County, the Bay Area, and beyond.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• SB 2 Grant Application Assistance | Statewide CA
• Los Angeles County SD5 Trails | Los Angeles CA
• Los Angeles County Sustainable Parks Master Plan | Los Angeles CA • Los Angeles Comprehensive Countywide Park Needs Assessment | Los Angeles CA
• Santa Ana River Parkway and Open Space Plan | Santa Ana CA • Vallejo Integrated Revitalization Program and Comprehensive General Plan Update | Vallejo CA
• First 5 CA, Montclair WeCare | Montclair CA
• San Carlos GIS | San Carlos CA
• San Mateo General Plan Update | San Mateo CA
• Contra Costa Transportation Authority On-Call Planning | Contra Costa County CA • Contra Costa County General Plan Update | Contra Costa County CA • Hollister General Plan Update | Hollister CA
• Elk Grove Disaster Preparedness Project | Elk Grove CA • Morgan Hill 2035 General Plan | Morgan Hill CA
• Menlo Park Housing Element EA | Menlo Park CA
• Upland General Plan Update and EIR | Upland CA
• Downtown Livermore Facilitation Services | Livermore CA • Vacaville General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, and EIR | Vacaville CA • Stockton General Plan Update | Stockton CA
• Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Update | Palo Alto CA
• Butte County General Plan Update and EIR | Butte County CA • Healthy High Desert | San Bernardino CA
EDUCATION
• BA, Geography, Edinboro University,
Edinboro, PA
CERTIFICATIONS
• GIS Professional
AFFILIATIONS
• Bay Area Automated Mapping
Association
Team member since 201 1
ROBERT MAZUR
GIS Director
[email protected]
• Santa Cruz TOD | Santa Cruz CA
• Tulare TOD Plan & General Plan Amendment | Tulare CA
• Walnut Creek BART Transit Village Plan EIR | Walnut Creek CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map Production | FEMA Region IX • Sidewalk Inventory Project | Oakland CA
• Sidewalk Inventory Project Seminar | Oakland CA
• Worldwide Defense Mapping for the National Imagery Mapping Association • Curb Ramp Inventory | Oakland CA
• True Green Land Care | San Jose CA
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• “Los Angeles County Trails Assessment”, 2015 Greater and Greener Conference, San Francisco CA
• “Oakland Citywide Sidewalk Condition/ADA Inventory”, 2006 ESRI International User Conference, San Diego CA
CHRIS HAZEL
Project Planner
EDUCATION
• MS, Urban and Regional Planning,
San Jose State University
• BS, Architectural Studies, University
of Illinois
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
Team member since 2023
Chris is a Project Planner and GIS Analyst with PlaceWorks, with a decade of experience in community development. He specializes in housing, comprehensive planning, and data analysis. His experience includes leading housing and community research in the academic sector, managing housing programs in the public sector, and performing policy and data analysis in the private sector. Chris has acted as the lead analyst to design parcel-based geospatial data analyses supporting projects for housing development policy, equitable open space access, and land use planning.
Recently, Chris has supported multiple projects by developing land use scenario buildout models to measure projected housing unit and job growth for general plan updates. He supports the development of informed research and policy as well as the application of ideas through data analysis and tool development. Chris is skilled at understanding complex data, developing methodologies, and disseminating technical information.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Housing
• Housing Action and Implementation Plan, TCAC Housing Development Tool | Lake County CA
• 7th Cycle Rural Housing Element, Program Planning and AFFH Maps | Statewide CA
• SB2 Reporting, Close Out Spending Data Analysis | Statewide CA • Tuolumne County Housing Element, AFFH Maps | Tuolumne County CA • Benicia Housing Element, AFFH Maps | Benicia CA
• Soledad Housing Element, AFFH Maps | Soledad CA
• Fresno COG Multi-Jurisdiction Housing Element, AFFH Maps | Fresno County CA
• Stockton Housing Element and Safety Element, Tribal Consultation Map | Stockton CA
Mapping and Spatial Analysis
• California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Site Analysis | Statewide CA • Multi-Jurisdictional Safety Element and Vulnerability Assessment | San Mateo County CA
• GIS Services, Multiple Tool Development | Weed CA
• Santa Rosa General Plan Update, Land Use and Safety Element Maps | Santa Rosa CA
• Lake County General Plan and Safety Element Mapping | Lake County CA • El Cerrito General Plan, Safety Element Hazard Posters | El Cerrito CA • Hesperia Transit Access Spatial Analysis | Hesperia CA
CHRIS HAZEL
Project Planner
[email protected]
• ArcGIS Urban Modelling | Solano County CA
• WRCOG APR Tracking Tool | Riverside CA
• Campus Plan Update, Meteorological Maps | University of California • Fresno, California Natural Diversity Database Map | Judicial Council of California
• Colfax General Plan, Land Use Maps | City of Colfax
• AFFH Data Viewer, Structure Age Maps | CA HCD
• Pickleball Court Feasibility Study | Orange County
• Organic Waste Management Database, Area Maps | Marin County Waste Management
Land Use and Data Analysis
• Placer County General Plan, Vacancy and Underutilized Areas Analysis | Placer County CA
• Hollister General Plan Update Land Use Buildout Modelling | Hollister CA • Lodi General Plan, Land Use Buildout | Lodi CA
• Rio Vista General Plan, Land Use Buildout | Solano County CA • Lafayette Safety Element, Maps and Data Analysis | Lafayette CA AWARDS
• 2023, San Jose Rotary Club, Rotary Challenge Award - Excellent Planning Report
• 2018, Illinois Jaycee of the Year
PUBLICATIONS
• Misplaced Trust: Evaluating the Equity of Community Land Trusts in High Opportunity Areas, Planning Report
ACTIVITIES
• Housing Data Infrastructure Workshop, TechEquity & the SJSU Institute for Metropolitan Studies, 2023
LEADERSHIP & COMMUNITY
• Champaign-Urbana Junior Chamber, President, 2019
• Department of Engineering Solar Decathlon, Docent, 2017
HAZEL CHOI
Project Planner
EDUCATION
• MA, Urban Planning, San Jose State
University
• BA, International Business,
Dongduk Women’s University
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
• Women in Transportation
Team member since 2024
Hazel has experience in comprehensive and long-range planning, with a specific focus on policy development for housing element updates.
She has been contributing to updating housing elements to achieve certification for various local jurisdictions throughout California.
Hazel also has expertise in preparing and updating zoning code amendments to ensure compliance with the recent state law changes for various local jurisdictions. She is committed to supporting cities and counties in successfully implementing their programs, helping them achieve their goals while meeting state requirements. Hazel has actively participated in numerous community outreach and surveys, dedicating her time to creating a range of visual materials that enhance the community’s understanding of various projects.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Housing Elements
• Westmorland Housing Element 2021-2029 | Westmorland CA • Loyalton Housing Element 2024-2029 | Loyalton CA
• Modoc Coutny Housing Element 2024-2029 | Modoc Coutny CA • San Joaquin County Housing Element 2023-2031 | San Joaquin County CA • Daly City Housing Element 2023-2031 | Daly City CA
• Cupertino Housing Element 2023-2031 | Cupertino CA
• Gonzales Housing Element 2023-2031 | Gonzales CA
• Fort Jones Housing Element 2023-2031 | Fort Jones CA
• Tehama Housing Element 2024-2029 | Tehama CA
• Tehama County Housing Element 2024-2029 | Tehama County CA • Red Bluff Housing Element 2024-2029 | Red Bluff CA
• California City Housing Element 2023-2031 | California City CA Zoning/Development Code Amendments
• San Bernardino Subdivision Code | San Bernardino CA
• Santa Rosa Housing Element Implementation | Santa Rosa CA • Coalinga Housing Element Implementation | Coalinga CA • Huron Housing Element Implementation | Huron CA
• Sanger Housing Element Implementation | Sanger CA
• Westmorland Housing Element Implementation | Westmorland CA AWARDS
• 2021 APA CA Northern Section, Award of Excellence: Alum Rock Avenue Community Assessment
• 2021 Maggie Walsh Leadership Legacy, WTS SF Bay Area Chapter • 2020 CA Northern Section Scholarship, California Planning Foundation
HAZEL CHOI
Project Planner
[email protected]
• 2020 Louie Barozzi Scholarship, San Jose State University
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
• Mentorship Program, WTS, 2023
• Research Fellow, Green 2.0, 2022
• APA Northern California Section News, Associate Editor, 2021
JASMINE OSMAN
Senior A ssociate
Jasmine’s particular interests in the planning profession include law, social equity, and the environment. At PlaceWorks, she assists both the planning and environmental teams on a wide range of projects for public- and private-sector clients—from industrial and residential developments to school facilities, parks and public works projects, specific plans, and general plan updates. With over eight years of CEQA experience and a CEQA Practice certificate from the UC San Diego Extension, Jasmine mostly assists the environmental team with managing projects and preparing CEQA analyses and documentation. As a senior project manager, she is skilled at coordinating efforts between clients, subconsultants, and the internal PlaceWorks team while ensuring projects are delivered on time, within budget, and of a high quality. Her organizational skills and attention to detail have proven beneficial for all.
When Jasmine assists the community planning team, her understanding of the principles of sustainability is augmented by her experience with the nuts and bolts of sustainable practices and low-impact development. She researched hydromodification, urban runoff alternatives, and water stewardship in San Diego canyons; assisted with the sustainable design for a park in Tijuana, Mexico; and prepared a crime and safety action plan for the neighborhood of Del Cerro as part of her master’s program capstone project. She has participated in community outreach events where she presented plan and design options; prepared materials with SketchUp, ArcGIS, and other programs; and fielded questions from the public about everything from recycling to hazardous waste to incentive programs.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
General Plan and Housing Element Updates
• City of Hesperia Focused General Plan Update EIR Addendum | Hesperia CA • City of Wildomar Proposed General Plan EIR | Wildomar CA • City of Barstow General Plan Update EIR | Barstow CA
• City of Corona General Plan Update EIR | Corona CA
• City of Fountain Valley General Plan Update EIR | Fountain Valley CA • City of Santa Ana General Plan Update EIR | Santa Ana CA • City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update EIR | Rancho Cucamonga CA Specific, Area, and Master Plans
• Bluffs at Hidden Springs Specific Plan | Wildomar CA
• Westminster Mall Specific Plan EIR | Westminster CA
• Ontario Ranch Business Park Specific Plan EIR | Ontario CA • Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Subsequent EIR | Yucaipa CA
EDUCATION
• Master of City Planning, San Diego
State University
• BA, Sustainability, minor in
Geography, San Diego State
University
CERTIFICATIONS
• CEQA Practice Certificate,
University of California San Diego
Extension
• CASH School Facilities Leadership
Academy
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
(APA)
• Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP)
• Coalition for Adequate School
Housing (CASH)
• California Association of School
Business Officials (CASBO)
• Small School Districts’ Association
(SSDA)
Team member since 2018
JASMINE OSMAN
Senior Associate
[email protected]
Planning
• Wildomar General Plan Update | Wildomar CA
• Fairview Development Center Specific Plan | Costa Mesa CA • Palomar Street Widening Project NEPA Environmental Report | Wildomar CA • Zoning Code Update | Temple City CA
• Carrol Canyon Master Plan | San Diego CA
• South Otay Mesa | San Diego CA
Other Projects
• Brea Mall Redevelopment Project | Brea CA
• Inland Valley Medical Center Project EIR | Wildomar CA • Chiquito Battery Energy Storage Facility Project Initial Study | Wildomar CA • 20-Acre Passive Park Initial Study | Wildomar CA
• Euclid and Heil Residential Project Addendum | Fountain Valley CA • Greenbriar Residential Development Project | Brea CA
• Largo Concrete Manufacturing Project | Wildomar CA
Environmental
School/Community College Projects
• Santa Ana College Turf Replacement Project, Rancho Santiago CCD | Santa Ana CA
• Del Mar HS Rebuild Project, Del Mar Union SD | San Diego CA • Early Childhood Education Center and District Office Project, Lemon Grove SD | San Diego County CA
• Pacific Highlands Ranch K-6 No. 2, Del Mar Union SD | San Diego CA • Solana Vista ES Reconstruction, Solana Beach SD | Solana Beach CA • Mission Hills HS Sitewide Athletic Improvements Project, San Marcos USD | San Marcos CA
• School Modernization and Reconstruction, Cardiff SD | Encinitas CA • Paul Ecke Central ES Rebuild Project, Encinitas Union SD | Encinitas CA • North School Reconstruction, Hermosa Beach City SD | Hermosa Beach CA AWARDS
• Envision Wildomar 2040 | 2025 Daniel Burnham Award of Merit for a Comprehensive Plan, California APA, Inland Empire Section • Brea Mall Mixed Use Project EIR | 2024 Environmental Analysis Document Award of Merit, AEP California
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• “Housing and Enrollment Trends,” CASH Fall Conference, October 2024, Newport Beach CA
• “CEQA: Navigating Complex Projects and Emerging Trends in Schools,” CASH Annual Conference, February 2025, Palm Springs, CA
• “Talk to My Lawyer: A Planner’s Guide to Enhancing Legal Defensibility in CEQA Documents,” 2025 AEP CA State Conference, April 2025, Oxnard, CA • “Site Analysis – Environmental Review,” Guest Lecturer for UCSD’s USP 175 Class, May 2025, La Jolla, CA
LEADERSHIP & COMMUNITY
• Board Member, AEP San Diego Chapter
• Coalition for Adequate School Housing (CASH) School Facilities Leadership Academy, 2025
LEXIE ZIMNY
Associate
Lexie is a sharp and focused environmental planner whose passion in planning stems from a desire to help clients make well-informed and inclusive decisions about communities, and whose alacrity in learning new skills and processes makes her a highly versatile team member.
She is adept at finding creative and accessible ways to communicate complex information. Lexie’s responsibilities include research, writing, and coordination with team members, clients, and subconsultants for projects of all types. She particularly excels at comprehensive planning projects, and her experience includes environmental analysis for more than a dozen general plan projects statewide and a wide variety of other project types including school facilities, annexation, parks, solar energy, and staff services projects.
In addition to her work producing CEQA compliance documents, Lexie is also a specialist supporting PlaceWorks’ Technical Services group with Air Quality/GHG, Energy, noise monitoring, and hydrology/water quality & utilities analyses for CEQA/NEPA documentation. Finally, Lexie is experienced with a variety of software and modeling programs, including, ArcGIS, SketchUp, AutoCAD, and the Adobe Creative Suite, and she continually advances her skills in these programs.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
General CEQA Environmental Services
• Contra Costa County General Plan Update EIR | Contra Costa County CA • City of Redding Gener
al Plan Update EIR | Redding CA
• Down
town Davis Specific Plan EIR | Davis CA
• City of Benicia Housing Element Upda
te EIR | Benicia CA
• Down
town San Bernardino Specific Plan EIR | San Bernardino CA • The Green
tree Project EIR | Vacaville CA
• Butte Coun
ty General Plan Update EIR | Butte County CA
• Colfa
x General Plan Update EIR | Colfax CA
• Wildomar Crossr
oads Mixed Use Project IS/MND | Wildomar CA
• Mills Crossing P
roject EIR | City of Rancho Cordova CA
• Walnut Business P
ark SEIR | Walnut CA
• Wine Countr
y Specific Plan SEIR | Yucaipa CA
• Irwindale Ga
teway Specific Plan EIR | Irwindale CA
• Ont
ario Regional Sports Complex EIR | Ontario CA
• City of Rio Vist
a Housing Element Update Exemption | Rio Vista CA
• City of Suisun City Housing Element Upda
te Exemption | Suisun City CA
EDUCATION
• BS, Environmental Policy Analysis
and Planning & Sus
tainable
Environmental Design, University of
California, Davis
Team member since 2022
LEXIE ZIMNY
Associate
[email protected]
• Solano County Housing Elemen t Update Addendum | Solano County CA • City of Sant
a Rosa Housing Element Update Addendum | Santa Rosa CA
• City of Emery
ville Housing Element Update Addendum | Emeryville CA
Air Quality, GHG, and Energy CEQA Technical Services
• Greenbriar Lane Residential Project EIR | Brea CA
• Hesperia General Plan Upda
te Addendum | Hesperia CA
• Placer County Gener
al Plan Update, Existing Conditions Report | Placer
County CA
• 27-Acre P
ark IS/MND | Wildomar CA
• Mark Tw
ain School Expansion Project IS/MND | Garden Grove USD
• Sant
a Fe ES Improvement Project IS/MND | Porterville USD
• Hope ES G
ymnasium/Classroom Building Project IS/MND and Internal Source Review | Hope Elementary School District
• Eas
tside ES Addendum | Riverside USD
• Eas
t Union HS Improvement Project Categorical Exemption | Manteca USD • Mant
eca HS Improvement Project Categorical Exemption | Manteca USD • Nicholas ES R
eplacement Project | Sacramento City USD
• Oak Ridge E
S Rebuild Project | Sacramento City USD
Noise Monitoring Services
• Bundy Cany on Road Widening Noise Review Project | Wildomar CA • Corona City P
ark Project IS/MND | Corona CA
• Yucc
a Valley Athletic Facility IS/MND | Yucca Valley
• Warr
en Road Residential Development Noise Technical Memorandum | Hemet CA
• City of Redding Gener
al Plan Update EIR | Redding CA
• Additional Noise Monitoring in R
esponse for McCarthy Residential Acoustic
Restaurant Fan Noise Acoustical Study Memorandum | San Rafael CA • La Sierra HS T
rack and Field Project EIR | Alvord USD
• Atw
ell TK-8 Project Addendum | Beaumont USD
• Sy
camore Academy School Expansion IS/MND | Wildomar CA
• Paak
uma Sports Lighting Project IS/MND | San Bernardino City USD Hydrology & Water Quality and Utilities & Service Systems CEQA Technical Services
• Grant Elementary School Campus Master Plan | Santa Monica–Malibu USD • Artesia Do
wntown Specific Plan EIR | Artesia CA
• Gale Av
enue Roadway Realignment IS/MND | City of Industry CA
• Newport Beach Landfill Gas t
o Energy Project IS/MND | Newport Beach CA
• Walnut Business P
ark SEIR | Walnut CA
• Spruce & Red Oak Mix
ed Use Project CE | Rancho Cucamonga CA
• Redondo Beach Gener
al Plan Update EIR | Redondo Beach CA
• Lodi General Plan Upda
te SEIR & Water Supply and Demand Technical
Memorandum | Lodi CA
Comprehensive Planning
• Yuba City General Plan Update, Safety Element | Yuba City CA • Eas
tvale 2040 General Plan Update, No-Net Loss Housing Analysis | Eastvale CA
4. Experience
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 45
Demonstrated Project Experience
PlaceWorks has extensive experience working on hundreds of general plans and is highly skilled in drafting and updating zoning code ordinances.
Select List of Zoning Projects
• Needles 2019 Mid-Cycle Housing Element and ADU Ordinance Update
• Riverside Missing Middle Housing Prototypes for Joint Use • Fountain Valley General Plan and Zoning Code Update
• Anaheim General Plan and Comprehensive Zoning Code Update • Glendora Station Area Plan and Zoning
• Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update
• Temple City 2050 General Plan and Comprehensive Online Zoning Code Update
• Objective Design Standards (ODS) for the cities of Wildomar, Murrieta, Tustin, Glendora, and Anaheim
• ODS Toolkits for Western Riverside COG and Orange County COG • Pittsburg General Plan Update and Comprehensive Zoning Code Update
• Orange TDR Feasibility Analysis
• Menlo Park Zoning Ordinance Amendments Environmental
Assessment
• ConnectMenlo General Plan Update and M-2 Area Zoning Update • Soledad SB 2 Zoning Ordinance Updates
See the following pages for detailed description of featured projects .
The Hesperia General Plan Update was intended to be a largely administrative exercise to implement 6th-cycle housing element programs and address recent legislative changes to safety and environmental justice requirements. After close coordination with staff, multiple public meetings, and in-depth discussion with the planning commission, it became clear that the scope of the project would need to include topics and issues not identified at the outset of the process.
In addition to accomplishing the stated objectives, the project team worked diligently to improve land use compatibility in key growth areas, identify opportunities to improve safety for all roadway users, and codify economic development goals, all without negatively impacting the overall schedule and budget. Ultimately, the process culminated in a plan that brings the city into compliance with state law and that improved upon the guidance in the 2010 general plan to ensure that the community reaps the benefit of future growth and development. CEQA compliance was met by an addendum on the previous general plan EIR.
HESPERIA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND CEQA
A Surprise Expansion in Scope
Location
Hesperia, California
Size
72.78 square miles; 100,633 population
Client
City of Hesperia
Date Completed
October 2025
Services Provided
General Plan Update, Housing Element
Implementation, Objective Design
Standards, Environmental Impact
Report
For the first time in nearly 40 years, the City of Needles updated its long-range planning documents—the land use and transportation elements—to take a comprehensive look at ways to improve the quality of life for the community. This effort established a new vision and policy framework to improve the places and spaces in Needles, make it safer and more enjoyable to move in and around town, and attract and leverage new investments by current and potential residents and businesses. Key objectives:
• Innovative Mix of Land Uses. To live, shop, gather and socialize, be entertained, and do business.
• Local Economic Benefits. New investment, more jobs, and increased city revenue.
• Better Alternatives to Driving. Expanded access for walking, biking, and transit.
• Enhanced Health. More physical activity and better air quality.
PlaceWorks also helped revise the city’s Zoning code to refine and clarify the purpose and details of land uses to be consistent with the general plan. Explicit density and intensity standards give flexibility to development and ensure compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods.
NEEDLES LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION
To Improve the Quality of Life in the Community
Location
Needles, California
Size
31.08 square miles; 4,857 population
Client
City of Needles
Date Completed
March 2023
Services Provided
Land Use Planning, Buildout Analysis,
ADU Ordinance Update, Residential
Zoning Standards
Awards
2023 Comprehensive Plan Award of
Excellence, APA-IE
After decades of stalled attempts at growth and economic development, the City of Barstow attracted interest from the BNSF Railroad to build a 4,500-acre integrated rail facility that will be powered by clean energy and facilitate direct transfer of containers to and from the ports along the Alameda Corridor and the BNSF mainline. With the potential to double the number of jobs and housing units in the city over the next 10 to 20 years, BSNF’s facility presented huge implications for the city’s land use, transportation, and public service systems as well as the quality of life for existing and future residents and businesses.
The city brought on PlaceWorks to overhaul its general plan and key parts of its zoning code as well as to provide CEQA analysis to appropriately plan for not only BNSF’s facility but also current and future development interest from residential and nonresidential developers. A major strategy proposed by PlaceWorks and embraced by the city was to address current and prevent future environmental justice and land use compatibility problems by replanning the western part of Barstow for industrial and supportive uses and focusing residential and other conventional development in the eastern portion of the city.
PlaceWorks also assisted with corresponding updates to the zoning code, prepared language for two new zones, and made revisions to ensure consistency with state law.
BARSTOW GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR
Building on the Past to Secure the Future
Location
Barstow, California
Size
41.3 square miles; 25,400 population
Client
City of Barstow
Date Completed
December 2025
Services Provided
Zoning Code Revisions, Land
Use Planning, GIS Data Analysis
and Mapping, Outreach, Policy,
Implementation, CEQA, Environmental
Technical Studies
As part of the City of Anaheim’s General Plan Update process, PlaceWorks updated the city’s zoning code to be consistent with recent changes in state law and 2022 housing element implementation.
Implementation actions included rezoning properties throughout the city to accommodate an additional 17,000 housing units. Capacity for new units was accommodated with application of a mixed-use designation and increased base density. Other zoning code updates included development standards for accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, and single room occupancy units and density bonus requirements and incentives. A new section was added to the code for objective design standards.
The PlaceWorks team worked closely with the city to customize the design standards to give property owners and developers more certainty about city expectations. Design standards address frontage types, building separation, and height. These standards bolstered the general plan’s community design element. Related modifications were also made to the city’s application review and approval process. The zoning code update and supporting EIR were adopted in 2025.
ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Planning for the Future
Location
Anaheim, California
Size
34,000 acres; 100,633 population
Client
City of Anaheim
Date Completed
May 2025
Services Provided
Zoning Code Updates for Housing
Element Implementation, Preparation
of Citywide Buildout Projections,
Objective Design Standards, General
Plan Land Use Element Amendment,
EIR
La Mirada
Buena Park
Westminster
Stanton
Fullerton
Placentia
Villa Park
Orange
Garden Grove
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
Buena Park
Buena Park
91 5
22 91
91 915
57 91
5 22
22 22
55 24
1 91
241
241
241
26 1
Proposed Land Use Plan City of Anaheim
GIS Central
December 16, 2024
Land Use
Designations
Residential
Estate Density
Low Density
Low Medium Hillside
Density
Corridor Residential
Low Medium Density
Mid Density
Medium Density
Commercial
Neighborhood Center
General Commercial
Regional Commercial
Commercial
Recreation
Industrial
Industrial
Office
Office-Low
Office-High
Mixed-Use
Mixed-Use Mid
Mixed-Use Medium
Mixed-Use Urban
Core
Mixed-Use High
Non-Residential
Mixed-Use
Mixed Use
Mixed Use-Corridor
Mixed Use-Industrial
Mixed Use-Low
Medium
Public and Quasi-Public
Facilities
School
Institutional Low
Institutional
Institutional High
Railroad
Open Space and
Recreation
Open Space
Parks
Water
3. Project Description
GENERAL PLAN FOCUSED UPDATE DRAFT PEIR
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Pl a c e Wo r k s
Figure 3-5
Proposed Land Use Plan
Source: City of Anaheim, 2024.
0 Scale (Miles)
1
The City of Moorpark selected PlaceWorks to lead a comprehensive update of the general plan, including the first comprehensive update to its zoning code in more than 30 years. The Zoning Code was updated to ensure that it aligns with the current aspirations and values of the community, the Moorpark General Plan 2050, and current state law and regulations. The most significant changes included the consolidation of numerous residential zones and the establishment of new zones, including three mixed-use and one new industrial zone, and their associated development standards. The Code update also implemented several programs outlined in the Housing Element related to housing development, permit processing, and inclusionary housing.
MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN, ZONING & EIR
A Vision and Roadmap for the Future
Location
Moorpark, California
Size
12.6 square miles; 34,000 people
Client
City of Moorpark
Date Completed
May 2023
Services Provided
General Plan, Visioning, Community
Outreach and Engagement, Urban
Design, Economic Analysis, GIS,
Community Profile, Housing Element
Update, Recreation and Open Space
Element, Zoning Code Updates,
Environmental Impact Report,
Vulnerability Assessment
Awards
2024 Comprehensive Plan Award of
Excellence, APACA-Central Section
2024 Outstanding Environmental
Resource Document Award of Merit
and 2024 Planning Document Award
of Merit, AEP California
PlaceWorks is preparing the City of Redondo Beach’s limited General Plan Update. As a part of this process, our team prepared detailed amendments to the City of Redondo Beach Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance to support implementation of the city’s certified housing element and proposed general plan update. The work included drafting ordinance text, updating zoning and subdivision standards and procedures, coordinating general plan consistency, and implementing key State housing laws, including:
• SB 166: no net loss
• AB 1397: by-right approval and replacement housing
• SB 330 and related Housing Crisis Act amendments (SB 8 and AB 1218) • State Density Bonus Law
• SB 2 and SB 745: transitional and supportive housing
• AB 2162: supportive housing streamlining
• AB 139: emergency shelters
• AB 101: low barrier navigation centers
• Employee Housing Act
• Fair Housing–related reasonable accommodation requirements
REDONDO BEACH GENERAL PLAN UPDATE & EIR
Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
Location
Redondo Beach, California
Size
6.21 square miles; 66,748 population
Client
City of Redondo Beach
Date Completed
In Progress
Services Provided
Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance,
Land Use Planning, CEQA Review,
AQ/GHG, Noise, and Traffic Technical
Studies, Public Engagement
City of Redondo Beach GPU consistency Working Draft - Zoning Map Changes May 2024 - PAGE 1
PlaceWorks developed a comprehensive and uniform set of objective design standards that covers all development types in the city of Glendora except hillside residential neighborhoods. To ensure consistency and create a more streamlined framework, we integrated the objective design standards into the city’s zoning code. This process involved reviewing the existing subjective design standards, incorporating them into the new objective framework, and eliminating all subjective criteria across the zoning code and two specific plans.
Throughout this process, we have worked closely with the city to develop the design standards in tandem with the Glendora Station Area Plan rezoning, ensuring that the new design standards align with the area’s goals and vision.
Glendora’s objective design standards are fully integrated into the City’s municipal code as a unique chapter within the Zoning Text. To ensure consistency with other aspects of the Zoning Code, PlaceWorks also extensively edited the General Regulations section of the code, which covers topics such as fences, walls, parking lots, loading, lighting, among others. Additionally, PlaceWorks reviewed and deleted duplicative design standards found in two specific plans, referring all design regulations across all zoning districts to the Zoning Code, including the new Objective Design Standards.
GLENDORA OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
Shaping Glendora with Streamlined Design and Community Vision Location
Glendora, California
Size
19.66 square miles; 52,548 population
Client
City of Glendora
Date Completed
Adopted November 2025
Services Provided
Objective Design Standards, Zoning
Code Updates, Community Outreach
The Temple City 2050 Mid-Century Plan was the first all-inclusive update of the city’s general plan in over 25 years. PlaceWorks updated all supplemental policies, including the Las Tunas/Rosemead Specific Plan and zoning code, and prepared an environmental impact report. As part of these updates, PlaceWorks analyzed the city’s demographic trends, unique cultural context, development, and built environment to identify new and updated goals and policies that allow the city to position itself to be fiscally sustainable and competitive on a local and regional level.
The goal of sustainability is essential to any general plan approach and was included in each element of the Mid-Century Plan, directly influenced by the EIR. This achieved two things: it kept the plan manageable, and it addressed sustainable practice within the framework of similar policies (i.e., land use, mobility, health, climate change, conservation, economic development).
Following adoption of the General Plan, the PlaceWorks team worked with staff to update the zoning code. The existing code had a mix of design suggestions and difficult to find requirements. The new code streamlined allowable uses, created a single table-structure for design requirements, and included a new mixed-use provision aligned with the General Plan. Draft sections of the new code were reviewed with the Planning Commission and public during monthly meetings, with modifications going into the document real-time. The code was also available on the internet for the public to review.
TEMPLE CITY 2050 MID-CENTURY PLAN & EIR
and Las Tunas/Rosemead Specific Plan and Zoning Code Update Project Type
Climate Action Planning
Location
Temple City, California
Size
35,000 Population; 4 square miles
Client
City of Temple City
Date Completed
2017
Services Provided
Outreach, Land Use Planning, Zoning
Code Update, Economic Analysis,
Design and Landscape Architecture,
Policy Development, Historic Resources,
Environmental Review, Website Design
Awards
2018 Comprehensive Planning Award:
Small Jurisdiction Award of Merit,
California APA, Los Angeles Section
4. Experience
54 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update This page intentionally left blank.
5. REFERENCES
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 55
5. REFERENCES
References for PlaceWorks are provided below and more can be provided upon request. We encourage the City to contact each and every one of these references to gain an idea of our history of work. More detailed descriptions are provided in the previous section for all of the following projects, plus others.
Project Names, Dates, Amounts Client Contact Description, Remedies, Relevant Staff Hesperia General Plan Update
and EIR
Dates: January 2024 – October 2025
Contract Amount: $902,991
Mr. Ryan Leonard
Principal Planner
CITY OF HESPERIA
9700 Seventh Ave
Hesperia CA 92345
760.947.1651
[email protected]
PlaceWorks worked diligently to improve land use
compatibility in key growth areas, identify
opportunities to improve safety for all roadway users,
and enhance community resiliency, all without
negatively impacting the overall schedule and budget.
Services provided include General Plan Update,
Objective Design Standards, Housing Element
Implementation, EIR Addendum.
Remedies: Drafted goals, policies, and standards that
satisfy legislative mandates while still allowing the City to develop in accordance with its vision for the future.
Relevant Staff: Mark Teague, Cory Witter, Rob Mazur
Needles General Plan Land Use and
Transportation Elements
Dates: May 2020 – March 2023
Contract Amount: $125,000
Mr. Patrick Martinez
City Manager
CITY OF NEEDLES
817 Third St
Needles CA 92363
760.326.2115 x2113
[email protected]
Our team established a new vision and policy
framework to improve the places and spaces in
Needles
. Key objectives included innovative mix of land
uses, local economic benefits, better alternatives to
driving, and enhanced health.
Remedies: Drafted land use and economic
development policies and programs that encourage
desirable growth in the Downtown area while
preserving the city’s historic charm.
Relevant Staff: Cory Witter
Barstow General Plan Update and EIR
Dates: January 2023 – In Progress
Contract Amount: $2,563,940
Ms. Genesis Crank
Planning & Community
Development Administrator
CITY OF BARSTOW
220 E Mountain View St, #A
Barstow CA 92311
760.255.5161
[email protected]
The City brought on PlaceWorks to overhaul its general
plan and key parts of its zoning code as well as to
provide CEQA analysis to appropriately plan for not
only BNSF’s facility but also current and future
development interest from residential and
nonresidential developers.
Remedies: Navigated a complex process that balanced
the need for economic growth with the duty to
safeguard existing and future residents from potential
hazards introduced by said growth.
Relevant Staff: Mark Teague, Cory Witter, Leo DiPierro
5. References
56 CITY OF HESPERIA • Comprehensive Development Code Update This page intentionally left blank.
6. ADDENDA
Technical Proposal for Services • PLACEWORKS 57
6. ADDENDA
No addenda were issued for this RFP.
PEOPLE
PROCESS
PRODUCT
Stakeholder
Interviews
Charrettes & Workshops
Mobile Outreach
Developer Roundtables
Research & Analyze Collaborate
Vision
Original Data Files
PLACEWORKS TEAM PROCESS
Envision
PEOPLE
The PlaceWorks Team believes in collaboration and community engagement every step of the way—from the assessment of current conditions and needs, to exploration of opportunities for the future, to confirmation of preferred visions, development plans, and implementation strategies and codes.
The PlaceWorks Team works through multiple methods to include as many people as possible.
Open Houses &
Public Hearings
Websites, Social MediaLocal Stakeholders
Document Review & Strategize Present
Environmental
Clearance Document
The Plan
• Plans
• Maps/Diagrams
• Graphics/Illustrations
• Tables/Charts
• Performance
Evaluations
PROCESS
The PlaceWorks Team is effective at completing projects on time and under budget.
We establish clear procedures and protocols to ensure
that the work and the program address objectives and
expected outcomes and coordinates with concurrent
client initiatives.
PRODUCT
The PlaceWorks Team is dedicated to providing clients
with reliable and effective products. This means that
for deliverable work products we will provide the Client with electronic files for publications.
placeworks.com
PlaceWorks - Santa Ana
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1 100, Santa Ana, CA 92707
714.966.9220
Additional Locations
Los Angeles | Inland Empire | San Luis Obispo | Berkeley | Sacramento
April 2, 2026 | Page 2
COST ESTIMATE
PlaceWorks assumes a project budget of $344,530 to co mplete an update to th e Hesperia Development Code. Should the City modify the outreach plan, PlaceWorks will modify the budget accordingly.
Hesperia Development Code Update
Task Cost
Task 1 Project Kick-off, Coordination, and Management $50,000 Task 2 Public Engagement* $95,620
Task 3 Development Code Update $154,350
Task 4 CEQA Documentation $26,120
Task 5 Adoption Hearings $10,920
Reimbursable Expenses $7,520
Total $344,530
*PlaceWorks will work with City Staff to refine as needed.
FEE SCHEDULE
PlaceWorks – 2026 Standard Fee Schedule
Attachment 2
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
City of Hesperia
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Rachel Molina, City Manager
BY: Eydee Jimenez, Economic Development Supervisor
Orlando Acevedo, Director of Development Services
SUBJECT: 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and , upon receiving public testimony:
(1) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-14 approving the 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan (AAP);
(2) Authorize staff to modify the AAP as directed by the City Council; (3) Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute and transmit all required documents, including the adopted 2026-2027 AAP and any amendments, to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to ensure timely receipt of funds.
BACKGROUND
Consolidated Plan
HUD requires all entitlement communities receiving CDBG funds to prepare and submit a Consolidated Plan (CP) every five years to establish a unified strategy for housing, community and economic development. The CP identifies priority needs and outlines how funding will be used to supp ort decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents.
The CP is implemented through Annual Action Plans (AAPs), which identify the specific activities and funding allocations, including CDBG resources, for each program year.
Annual Action Plan
To implement the CP, the City has prepared an AAP outlining activities and budgets for the upcoming program year. The AAP allocates CDBG funds to specific programs and projects.
Applications for Administration and Non -Administration/Non-Public Service (Capital) activities were distributed to City departments. An application was also provided to the Fair Housing Foundation (FHF) to accomplish the City’s fair housing service requirements. Applications were made available at City Hall and on the City’s website and were due January 28, 2026. No late applications were accepted.
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
2026-2027 CDBG Annual Action Plan
April 21, 2026
Update Since Public Notice
Since publication of the public hearing notice on March 18, 2026, the City was notified by HUD that it will not receive HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds for Program Year 2026–2027. As a result, the previously anticipated Consolidated Plan Substantial Amendment and HOME-funded activities have been removed from consideration.
The public hearing will proceed as scheduled and will focus solely on the 2026 –2027 CDBG Annual Action Plan.
ISSUES/ANALYSIS
AAP (Program Funding)
Based on submitted applications and the City’s five-year goals, the proposed funding allocations for Administration and Capital Improvements are included in Exhibit “A.” These recommendations prioritize street improvements and housing rehabilitation and align with CDBG national objectives.
The City’s estimated CDBG allocation is $946,179. Up to 20% may be used for administration; however, staff recommend allocating $124,000 (13.1%). Public service activities will continue to be funded through the City’s General funded Community Assistance Program (CAP), allowing CDBG funds to focus on capital improv ements. The remaining $822,179 will be allocated accordingly.
Due to potential changes in the City’s 2026 –2027 CDBG allocation, staff recommends the following adjustment methodology:
If the CDBG allocation is higher than $946,179:
o Additional funds will be allocated to the Street Improvement Project. All other funding levels will remain unchanged.
If the CDBG allocation is lower than $946,179:
o Reductions will be applied proportionately across all eligible categories, including Administration and Capital Improvements, to maintain a balanced program while continuing to prioritize investment in street improvements to the greatest extent feasible.
Recommendations
Exhibit A outlines recommended funding for all eligible activities. Each project will be monito red by the Economic Development Division to ensure compliance with CDBG requirements. The City Council retains discretion to modify funding allocations.
Public Notice
The 30 -day public review period for the Annual Action Plan began on March 18, 2026, and concludes on April 21, 2026. Documents were made available online and at City facilities.
Although the original public notice referenced both the Annual Action Plan and a Consolidated Plan Substantial Amendment related to HOME funding, the City has since been notified that HOME funds will not be allocated. Therefore, only the Annual Action Plan is being considered at this public hearing.
Staff Report to the Mayor and Council Members
2026-2027 CDBG Annual Action Plan
April 21, 2026
All public comments will be incorporated prior to submission to HUD. Upon conclusion of the public comment period, all w ritten comments received will be included in the final document submitted to HUD.
CITY GOAL SUPPORTED BY THIS ITEM
Future Development - Facilitate balanced growth to ensure cohesive community development and pursue economic development.
Capital Improvement - Continually evaluate capital improvement priorities.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s estimated allocation is $946,179 in CDBG funds. Approval of the AAP will allocate these funds to eligible activities. There is no impact to the City’s General Fund.
ALTERNATIVE(S)
Provide alternative direction to staff.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1.Resolution No. 2026-14
2. Exhibit A: Department Action Plan Budget Recommendation
3. Exhibit B: CDBG Application Summary Matrix
4. Copies of the 202 6-2027 AAP are on file with the City Clerk and are available on the City’s website
5. Application Notebooks (Binders provided under separate cover)
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PROGRAM S AND FUNDING LEVELS FOR
INCLUSION IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) 2026-2027 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
OR THEIR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AND TRANSMIT ALL NECESSARY
DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS THERETO TO HUD UPON COMP LETION
OF THE PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD
WHEREAS, the City of Hesperia (“City”), is a municipal corporation duly organized under the laws and Constitution of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the City is an entitlement jurisdiction for federal Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG); and
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the City to adopt and implement a Five-year Consolidated Plan to guide the expenditure of the City's annual entitlement of CDBG funds in support of projects and activities predominantly benefiting low- and moderate-income residents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the current 20 25-2029 Consolidated Plan on April 15, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Consolidated Plan contains certain goals and accomplishments to be met during the five-year planning period through the expenditure of CDBG funds and other identified funding sources; and
WHEREAS, the City accepted applications for CDBG funding for the 2026-2027 program year until January 28, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Economic Development Division (EDD) staff evaluated eligible applications and made funding recommendations to be incorporated into the City's 2026 -2027 Annual Action Plan (AAP); and
WHEREAS, the City’s EDD 2026-2027 AAP funding recommendations were advanced to the City Council for review, ratification and/or modification at the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City anticipates receiving a 202 6-2027 CDBG entitlement allocation of $946,179 and will make proportional adjustments to approved activities upon notification of the final entitlement amount; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2026, the City Council, after holding a Public Hearing, evaluated the City’s staff recommendations and approved the program/projects and funding levels to be included in the Final 2026-2027 AAP submitted to HUD; and
WHEREAS, the City is in compliance with its Citizen Participation Plan which requires the City to conduct a public hearing and a 30 -day public review period to receive public input when
an AAP is proposed.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HESPERIA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The recitals above are true and correct and are adopted as findings.
Section 2. The City Council approves the CDBG program/projects and funding levels for the 2026-2027 AAP to be submitted to HUD and attachments thereto, as presented.
Section 3. The City Manager or their designee is hereby authorized to execute all necessary documents and any certifications to implement the 2026-2027 AAP.
Section 4. The City Council further authorizes the City Manager or their designee to approve any modifications and/or amendments to the 2026-2027 AAP if required to ensure approval by HUD, including making any changes necessary to facilitate approval and compliance with CDBG regulations.
Section 5. The 2026-2027 AAP CDBG funds shall be incorporated into the City's Fiscal Year 2026-2027 EDD Budget and are hereby approved for expenditure.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 21st day of April 2026.
______________________________
Brigit Bennington, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Jessica Giber, Assistant City Clerk
Funding Categories Applicant Program/Project Applicant Request Staff Recommendations
City Council
Approval
Public Services
(Funded through
Community Assistance
Program)
N/A $ - $ - $ - City - 26-27 Street Improvement Project 822,179$ 822,179$ -$ -$ -$
Sub Total 822,179$ 822,179$ -$ City - CDBG Administration 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ Fair Housing Foundation 24,000$ 24,000$ -$ Sub Total 124,000$ 124,000$ -$ 822,179$ 822,179$ -$ 124,000$ 124,000$ -$ Grand Total 946,179$ 946,179$ -$ 2026-2027 CDBG Entitlement: $946,179
Total 2026-2027 Budget: $946,179
Exhibit A: Staff Recommendations
Other Programs
Administration
(Not to exceed 20% of
annual allocation $189,235)
Other Programs Total
April 21, 2026
Admin TotalTOTALS
Exhibit B
CDBG Application Matrix
Applicant Program Description Location
Proposed Persons
Served
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
17-18
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
18-19
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
19-20
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
20-21
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
21-22
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
22-23
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
23-24
Prev. Yr
Funded
Budget
24-25
Current Yr.
Funded
Budget
25-26
Funds
Requested
26-27
City of Hesperia - CDBG Administration CDBG Program Administration Hesperia N/A $175,651 $191,636 $86,694 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $140,000 $100,000 $100,000 Fair Housing Foundation Fair Housing and Landlord/Tenant Mediation Long Beach 80 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA $10,000 $24,000 Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) Fair Housing and Landlord/Tenant Mediation Ontario 20 FH/50 LT People $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $20,000 $22,000 $0 $0 $115,000 $120,000 $162,000 $110,000 $124,000
City of Hesperia - Development Services Street Improvement Project Hesperia 3,000 People $678,115 $606,546 $977,972 $700,000 $174,639 $877,601 $779,363 $810,781 $822,179 $822,179 $822,179
Housing, Economic Dev, & Other Community Dev. Programs FY 25-26 Public Services FY 25-26 (funded through Community Assistance Program) Administration Activities (20% max=$189,235) FY 26-27
Administration Activities Subtotal requested
Housing, Econ Dev, & Other Community Dev. Sub-Total
Draft Annual Action Plan
FY 2026-2027
April 21, 2026
City of Hesperia i Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
This page intentionally left blank
City of Hesperia ii Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... - 1 - AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ................................ ............................ - 1 - PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies – 91.200(b) ................................ ................................ .......... - 8 - AP-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l) ................................ ................................ ....... - 10 - AP-12 Participation – 91.105, 91.200(c) ................................ ................................ ....................... - 35 - Expected Resources ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ - 37 - AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2) ................................ ................................ ............... - 37 - Annual Goals and Objectives ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... - 37 - AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ................................ ................................ ............................ - 40 - AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d) ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... - 48 - AP-38 Project Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... - 42 - AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f) ................................ ................................ ................... - 43 - Affordable Housing ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... - 46 - AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g) ................................ ................................ ......................... - 46 - AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h) ................................ ................................ ............................... - 46 - AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i) ................................ ................. - 48 - AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.220(j) ................................ ................................ ......... - 51 - AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k) ................................ ................................ ................................ .. - 53 - Program Specific Requirements ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... - 55 - AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220(l)(1,2,4) ................................ ............................ - 55 -
Annual Action Plan Tables
Table 1 – Strategic Plan Summary................................ ................................ ................................ ..... - 4 - Table 2 – Responsible Agencies ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ - 9 - Table 3 – Agencies, Groups, Organizations Who Participated ................................ ......................... - 12 - Table 4 – Other Local / Regional / Federal Planning Efforts ................................ ............................. - 39 - Table 5 – Citizen Participation Outreach ................................ ................................ .......................... - 42 - Table 6 – Expected Resources – Priority Table ................................ ................................ ............... - 43 - Table 7 – Goals Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... - 46 - Table 8 – Goal Description ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. - 47 - Table 9 – Project Information ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... - 48 - Table 10 – Goals Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. - 49 - Table 11 – Geographic Distribution ................................ ................................ ................................ .. - 51 -
City of Hesperia iii Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Table 12 – One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement ................................ .. - 52 - Table 13 – One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type……….…………………………… ... - 52 -
Table 14 – CDBG Requirements ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... - 61 - Table 15 – Other CDBG Requirements ................................ ................................ ............................ - 61 -
City of Hesperia i Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Version History
No. Summary of Changes
1 Published Draft for Public
Comment:
March
18, 2026
Sent to HUD for
Approval:
May 15,
2026
Conducted Public Hearing: April 21,
2026 Approved by HUD: TBD
Original 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan.
2 Published Draft for Public
Comment: Sent to HUD for
Approval:
Conducted Public Hearing: Approved by HUD:
Amendment 1 (Substantial / Non-Substantial):
3 Published Draft for Public
Comment: Sent to HUD for
Approval:
Conducted Public Hearing: Approved by HUD:
Amendment 2 (Substantial / Non-Substantial):
4 Published Draft for Public
Comment: Sent to HUD for
Approval:
Conducted Public Hearing: Approved by HUD:
Amendment 3 (Substantial / Non-Substantial):
5 Published Draft for Public
Comment: Sent to HUD for
Approval:
Conducted Public Hearing: Approved by HUD:
Amendment 4 (Substantial / Non-Substantial):
City of Hesperia - 1 - Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Executive Summary
AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
1. Introduction
The 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan is the second of five annual plans implementing the 202 5- 2029 Consolidated Plan Strategic Plan goals for the investment of annual allocations of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Annual Action Plan (AAP) identifies available resources, annual goals, projects, and activities for the period beginning July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2027.
The City receives CDBG funds from HUD on a formula basis each year, and in turn, the City typically awards grants to nonprofit s, for-profits and/or public organizations for programs and projects in furtherance of this Plan. The CDBG program provides a range of eligible activities for the benefit of low- and moderate-income persons.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program with three (3) primary objectives against which HUD evaluates the Consolidated Plan and the City’s performance under the Plan. Those primary objectives are decent housing, suitable living environments, and e xpanded economic opportunities for low - and moderate-income persons.
The CDBG regulations require that each activity meet one of the following national objectives:
Benefit low- and moderate-income persons;
Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency (usually the result of a natural disaster).
For the 2026-2027 program year, the City anticipates receiving an annual allocation of $946,179 and will not be carrying over or repurposing any prior year funds. Therefore, the total CDBG annual budget will be $946,179.
Due to slight adjustments that can occur with CDBG allocations prior to HUD’s approval of the Action Plan, a request of the City Council is being made to provi de staff and the public with a methodology for which activity budgets will be adjusted if allocations are adjusted by HUD. It is
City of Hesperia - 2 - Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
recommended that City Council adopt the following language for adjusting activity budgets for the CDBG program:
Should the CDBG allocation be higher than $946,179:
o Balance of additional funds will be allocated to the 2026-2027 Street Improvement Project.
o Funding levels for all outstanding activities will remain the same as proposed in the 2026-2027 AAP.
Should the CDBG allocation be lower than $946,179:
o Balance of reduced funds will be deducted from the 202 6-2027 Street Improvement Project.
o Funding levels for all outstanding activities will remain the same as proposed in the 2026-2027 AAP.
The CDBG program activities to be implemented from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027, include:
2026-2027 CDBG Public Service Activities
Public Service activities will be funded through City leveraged funds. Therefore, all funds originally budgeted for Public Service activities will be programmed to Non-Administration/Non- Public Service activities (also referred to as Capital Activities). 2026-2027 CDBG Capital Activities
City – Street Improvement Project
$822,179
2026-2027 CDBG Program Administration Activities
City - Program Administration
$100,000
Fair Housing Foundation - Fair Housing Services
$24,000
TOTAL ALLOCATION CDBG FY 2026-2027: $946,179
2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan HUD’s Community Planning and Development (CPD) Outcome Performance Measurement Framework classifies objectives in three (3) categories: decent housing, a suitable living
City of Hesperia - 3 - Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
environment, and economic opportunity. Based on the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis, the Strategic Plan identifies two (2) high priority needs to be addressed through the implementation of activities aligned with the three (3) Strategic Plan goals.
The two (2) high priority needs include:
Provide public facility and infrastructure i mprovements to create a suitable living environment
Ensure equal access to housing opportunities
The following three (3) goals are identified in the Strategic Plan:
Public Facility and Infrastructure Improvements
Fair Housing Services
Administration and Planning
Goal Name Category Needs Addressed
5-Year
Outcome
Indicator
1. Public Facility and
Infrastructure
Improvements
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Provide public facility and
infrastructure improvements
to create suitable living
environment
15,000
Persons
Assisted
2. Fair Housing
Services
Affordable Housing Ensure equal access to
housing opportunities
350 Persons
Assisted
4 Administration and
Planning
Administration All Other - 5
3. Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary
3. Evaluation of past performance
The investment of HUD resources in the City of Hesperia continues to have a great impact for positive change in the community. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City and its partners to accomplish the following goals during the prior year five (5) year Consolidated Plan cycle, 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023, 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 program years (current year 2025-2026 CDBG accomplishments are not available as of the preparation of this document):
City of Hesperia - 4 - Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
From July 1, 2024 through June 30, 202 5, the City and its partners were able to utilize CDBG funds to accomplish the following:
Provide fair housing and landlord tenant mediation services to 290 unduplicated City residents.
Complete the 2021-2022 Street Improvement Project, assisting 8,000 City residents. Commence design and engineering on Oakwood Avenue as part of the 23 -24 Street Improvement Project.
Commence design and engineering of the 24-25 Street Improvement Project.
During July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024, the City and its partners were able to utilize CDBG funds to accomplish the following:
Provide fair housing and landlord tenant mediation services to 386 unduplicated residents.
Award a construction contract for the City’s 2021 -2022 Street Improvement Project that will benefit 6,000 unduplicated residents.
Commit 22-23 Street Improvement Project funds to the 21-22 Street Improvement Project benefitting an additional 2,000 unduplicated residents.
During July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, the City and its partners were able to utilize CDBG funds to accomplish the following:
Provide fair hous ing and landlord tenant mediation services to 409 unduplicated residents.
Award contracts for design and engineering design services for the City’s 2021 -2022 Street Improvement Project which is projected to assist approximately 6,000 unduplicated City residents.
Commence engineering and design services for the City’s 2021-2022 Street Improvement Project.
Finalize c onstruction of the City’s Peach Avenue Drainage Improvement P roject benefiting 11,140 unduplicated residents.
During July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, the City and its partners were able to utilize CDBG funds to accomplish the following:
Complete the reconstruction of the streets encompassed in the City’s 2019 -2020 Street Improvement Project which benefitted 4,000 unduplicated residents. Award and commence the reconstruction of streets encompassed in the City’s 2020-2021 Street Improvement Project which will benefit approximately 3,485 unduplicated residents.
Provide fair housing and landlord tenant mediation services to 404 und uplicated residents.
Create/retain three (3) full -time equivalent jobs under the City’s Emergency Business
City of Hesperia - 5 - Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Assistance Program (EBAP)
Complete the reconstruction of streets encompassed in the City’s 2020 -2021 Street Improvement Project that benefited 3,485 residents.
Commence procurement efforts for design and engineering services for the City’s 2021 - 2022 Street Improvement Project which is projected to assist approximately 1,000 unduplicated City residents.
Award and commence construction of the City’s Peac h Avenue Drainage Improvement Project which will benefit 11,140 residents (project anticipated to be completed during the 2022-2023 program year).
During July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021, the City and its partners were able to utilize CDBG funds to accomplish the following:
Complete the reconstruction of the streets encompassed in the City’s 2019 -2020 Street Improvement Project which benefitted 4,000 unduplicated residents. Award and commence the reconstruction of streets encompassed in the City’s 2020-2021 Street Improvement Project which will benefit approximately 3,485 unduplicated residents.
Continue engineering and design efforts on the Peach Avenue Drainage Improvement Project which will benefit approximately 11,140 unduplicated residents. Provide fair housing and landlord tenant mediation services to 540 unduplicated residents.
Implemented the City’s Emergency Housing and Utility Assistance Program (EHUAP) which provided rental, mortgage and utility assistance to a total of 50 unduplicated residents (persons).
Implemented the City’s Microenterprise Assistance Program (MAP) which reviewed and approved one (1) eligible business.
Implemented the City’s Emergency Business Assistance Program (EBAP) which reviewed and approved three (3) eligible businesses.
4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Subsequent to the enactment of the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009, HUD revised the Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 to emphasize the importance of citizen participation and consultation in the development of the Consolidated Plan. HUD strengthened the consultation process with requirements for consultation with the CoC, Public Housing Authorities (PHA), busine ss leaders, civic leaders, and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low -income individuals and families, homeless individuals and families, youth and/or other persons wi th special needs. Together with the analytic capabilities of the eCon Plan Suite, these requirements created the conditions necessary to
City of Hesperia - 6 - Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
implement a collaborative, data-driven and place-based planning process that includes a robust level of citizen participation and consultation.
The City adopted a new Citizen Participation Plan on September 17, 2019 (subsequently amended on November 17, 2020) that reflects regulatory changes and process improvements.
In accordance with the City’s adopted Citizen Participat ion Plan, the City facilitated citizen participation through resident and stakeholder surveys, internet outreach, community meetings, in person consultations and public hearings. Efforts were made to encourage participation by low- and moderate-income persons, particularly those living in slum and blighted areas and in areas where HUD funds are proposed to be used, and by residents of predominantly low - and moderate-income neighborhoods. The City also made efforts to encourage the participation of minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities. Per the City’s approved Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan, public notices soliciting citizen participation were published in both English and Spanish. The consultation process included representatives of the CoC, PHA, and other specified groups who completed surveys, provided local data and assisted the City to ensure practical coordination of strategies to maximize impact and to avoid duplication of effort.
5. Summary of public comments
2026-2027 Annual Action Plan
A public hearing to receive comments on the proposed projects/activities and the funding levels for inclusion in the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan was held before the City Council on April 21, 2026. All comments received were incorporated into the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan prior to the City’s submission to HUD (see Appendix A).
2025 – 2029 Consolidated Plan
Community meetings to discuss the housing and community development needs in the community were held on October 28, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the Hesperia Public Library at 9650 Seventh Avenue, Hesperia. No public comments were received.
A public hearing to receive comments on the draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the draft 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan was held before the City Council on April 15, 2025. All comments were received and incorporated into the City’s 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.
6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
All public comments received during the 30-day review period and public hearing held on April 21, 2026, were accepted and incorporated into the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan.
7. Summary
City of Hesperia - 7 - Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
The 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan addresses all three (3) of the Strategic Plan Goals from the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan by allocating a total of $946,179 in current year CDBG funds to projects and activities to be implemented from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027.
City of Hesperia 8 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies – 91.200(b)
1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan
The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidat ed Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator City of Hesperia Economic Development Division
Table 2 – Responsible Agencies
Narrative
The City ’s Economic Development Division is the lead agency responsible for the administration of the CDBG program. The City contracted with LDM Associates, Inc. to prepare the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and current 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan.
Policy and funding approvals are decided by the City Council, which consists of the Mayor, who is elected by districts and four City Council Members from each of four council districts. Decisions regarding implementation of activities within the Consolida ted Plan are based on staff recommendations and input from the residents.
In the development of the City’s Consolidated Plan, LDM Associates, Inc. developed and implemented a comprehensive citizen participation and consultation process and conducted a needs assessment and market analysis to identify levels of relative need regarding affordable housing, homeles sness, special needs, and community development. This information was gathered through consultation with public officials and local agencies, public outreach and community meetings, review of demographic and economic data, and housing market analysis.
In the implementation of the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan and each of the three (3) subsequent Annual Action Plans, the Economic Development Division shall be responsible for all grants planning, management , and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy.
City of Hesperia 9 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
City of Hesperia
Economic Development Division
Eydee Jimenez, Economic Development Supervisor
9700 Seventh Avenue
Hesperia, CA 92345
[email protected]
(760) 947-1202
City of Hesperia 10 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
AP-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)
1. Introduction
As part of the preparation of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan the City reached out for consultation to agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the development of affordable housing, creation of job opportunities for low- and moderate‐income residents, and/or provision of services to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless per sons. To facilitate this consultation, the City solicited feedback through the following methods:
- Community Needs Survey (web‐based and paper‐surveys)
- Community and stakeholder meetings
- Public hearings
- Receipt of written or oral comments
The input receive d from these consultations helped establish and inform the objectives and goals described in the Strategic Plan.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).
The City recognizes the importance of careful coordination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of its CDBG allocations. As a result, during the development of the 2025 -2029 Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with community organizations and City Departments. Outreach efforts included surveys, public noticing, and invitation to the community and stakeholder meetings. Outreach was made to over 100 organizations and agencies including:
- Nonprofit services providers,
- Affordable and market rate housing developers,
- Housing advocates,
- Public agencies (such as the school district and Public Housing Authority) - Economic development and employment organizations
- Community and neighborhood groups, and Neighboring cities and communities.
The City will continue to foster and strengthen these relationships over the five -year planning period to ensure coordinated implementation of CDBG-funded projects.
City of Hesperia 11 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness
The Sa n Bernardino County Continuum of Care (CoC) includes a diverse network of public, private, nonprofit, faith -based, and for -profit entities. These groups collectively address the needs of individuals and families experiencing homelessness by leveraging federal, state, and local resources. The City of Hesperia actively participates in the CoC system and supports local services for individuals experiencing homelessness. The non- profit and faith-based communities are vital partners in these efforts, particularly in serving veterans, survivors of domestic violence, youth, and individuals with disabilities.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standard s and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The City participates annually in the CoC’s Point -in-Time Count and subpopulation survey. During the preparation of this Plan, the City consulted with the San Bernardino County CoC to gather data on homelessness and assess the needs of the local unhoused population. This outreach included homeless service providers, who are active members of the CoC. The City aligns its priorities with th e CoC to address the community’s needs effectively, especially in areas such as ESG fund allocation, HMIS administration, and performance evaluation.
Table 3 provides a listing of the entities consulted as part of this planning process.
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities
Table 3 - Agencies, Groups, Organizations Who Participated
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
1 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Adelanto
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
City of Hesperia 12 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
2 Agency/ Group/ Organization Town of Apple Valley
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
3 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Fontana City Manager’s Office Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
4 Agency/ Group/ Organization Fontana City Council
Type Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Anti-
Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
5 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Fontana Police Department Type Local Government; Emergency Management Agency;
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homeless Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
6 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Hesperia City Manager's Office Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
City of Hesperia 13 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
7 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Rancho Cucamonga
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
8 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Rialto Community Services Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
9 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of San Bernardino
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
10 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Upland
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
11 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Victorville
Type Local Government; Housing; Services-Housing; Service- Children; Services-Elderly; Planning Organization
City of Hesperia 14 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Lead-
Based Paint Strategy; Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
12 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Department of Behavioral Health, Homeless Services
Type
Local Government; Publicly Funded Institution; Health
Agency; Services-Homeless; Local Government; Continuum
of Care
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
13 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors District 2 Type Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Needs Assessment; Homelessness Strategy; Non-
Homeless Special Needs; Economic Development; Anti-
Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
14 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office, Victim Services
Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Local Government What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
15 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Economic Development Agency Type Local Government; Regional Organization; Planning
Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development; Anti-Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
16 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Office of Homeless Services
City of Hesperia 15 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Type Continuum of Care; Services-Homeless; Regional
Organization; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
17 Agency/ Group/ Organization Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino Type PHA; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Public Housing Needs; Homelessness Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
18 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Library, Adult Literacy Services Type Services-Education; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Housing Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
19 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Preschool Services Department Type Services-Children; Services-Education; Local Government What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
20 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools Type Services-Education; Services-Children; Services-Homeless; Publicly Funded Institution; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Other-Non-Housing Community Development;
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –Families
with Children, Unaccompanied Minors
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
21 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Transitional Assistance Department Type Child Welfare Agency; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
City of Hesperia 16 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
22 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Veterans Affairs Type Services-Homeless Veterans; Services-Elderly; Services- Health; Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
23 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Workforce Investment Board Type Services – Employment; Regional Organization; Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Economic Development; Anti-Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
HOMELESSNESS
24 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Homeless Provider Network Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
25 Agency/ Group/ Organization A Place Along the Way
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
26 Agency/ Group/ Organization Caring by Nature
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty
City of Hesperia 17 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
27 Agency/ Group/ Organization Community Action Partnership of San Bernardino Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
28 Agency/ Group/ Organization Feed My Sheep in the High Desert Type Services-Homeless; Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs;
Anti-Poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
29 Agency/ Group/ Organization Frazee Community Center
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
30 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Homeless Services, Inc.
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
31 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Second Chance Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
32 Agency/ Group/ Organization Holy Family Food Bank
Type Services-Homeless; Other
City of Hesperia 18 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
33 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Community Food Bank Type Services-Homeless; Other
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
34 Agency/ Group/ Organization Inland Valley Hope Partners Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
35 Agency/ Group/ Organization Orenda Foundation
Type Service-Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
36 Agency/ Group/ Organization Reach-Out
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy, Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
37 Agency/ Group/ Organization St. Joseph Church, His hands Ministry Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy, Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
City of Hesperia 19 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
38 Agency/ Group/ Organization San Bernardino County Interagency Council on Homelessness
Type Service-Homeless; Regional Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Homelessness Needs –
Chronically Homeless, Families with Children; Veterans, Unaccompanied Minors; Anti-Poverty
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
39 Agency/ Group/ Organization Water of Life Church
Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy; Anti-Poverty How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
40 Agency/ Group/ Organization Family Assistance Program Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-Homeless What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homeless Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
41 Agency/ Group/ Organization Pacific Lifeline
Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-Homeless What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development; Housing
Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
42 Agency/ Group/ Organization Project Sister Family Services Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-Homeless What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development; Homelessness Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
43 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Domestic Violence, Inc.
Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-
Homeless; Services-Homeless Veterans
City of Hesperia 20 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Homeless Strategy; Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
44 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Family Resource Center Type Services-Victims of Domestic Violence; Services-Children What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
ELDERLY & DISABLED
45 Agency/ Group/ Organization Council on Aging-Southern California Type Services – Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
46 Agency/ Group/ Organization George M. Gibson Senior Center Type Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
47 Agency/ Group/ Organization Oldtimers Foundation
Type Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
48 Agency/ Group/ Organization Rock'n Our Disabilities
Type Services-Disability
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Non-Housing Community
Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
City of Hesperia 21 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
49 Agency/ Group/ Organization Rolling Start Inc.
Type Services-Disability
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
CHILDREN
50 Agency/ Group/ Organization Apple Valley Police Activities League (AVPAL) Type Service-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
51 Agency/ Group/ Organization Assistance League of Victor Valley Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
52 Agency/ Group/ Organization Boys & Girls Club of Fontana Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
53 Agency/ Group/ Organization Big Brothers/Big Sisters Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
54 Agency/ Group/ Organization Cedar House Life Change Center Type Foster Care Agency/Facility, Services-Children
City of Hesperia 22 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
55 Agency/ Group/ Organization Child Advocates of San Bernardino (CASAC) Type Foster Care Agency/Facility; Child Welfare Agency; Services-Children; Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
56 Agency/ Group/ Organization Child Care Resource Center Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty Strategy;
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
57 Agency/ Group/ Organization High Desert Community Foundation – Hesperia Police Activities League (HPAL)
Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
58 Agency/ Group/ Organization Kid-2-Kid Closet
Type Services – Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
59 Agency/ Group/ Organization Millionaire Mind Kids
Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Other-Non-Housing Community Development Strategy
City of Hesperia 23 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
EDUCATION
60 Agency/ Group/ Organization Chaffey College, Fontana Campus Type Services-Education; Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-
Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
61 Agency/ Group/ Organization Fontana Unified School District Type Services-Children; Publicly Funded Institution; Services- Education; Services-Homelessness
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homelessness Strategy;
Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
62 Agency/ Group/ Organization Rancho Cucamonga Unified School District Type Services-Education; Services-Children; Services-Homeless; Publicly Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homelessness Strategy;
Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
63 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley College
Type Services-Education; Publicly Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-
Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
64 Agency/ Group/ Organization Upland Public Library
Type Services-Education
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
City of Hesperia 24 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
65 Agency/ Group/ Organization Upland Unified School District Type Services-Education; Services-Children; Services-Homeless; Publicly Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Homelessness Strategy;
Anti-Poverty; Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
FAIR HOUSING
66 Agency/ Group/ Organization Inland Fair Housing & Mediation Board (IFHMB) Type Services-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
67 Agency/ Group/ Organization Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino Type Services-Fair Housing; Civic Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Analysis; Homelessness Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
HOUSING
68 Agency/ Group/ Organization Building Industry Association Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
69 Agency/ Group/ Organization California Apartment Association of Inland Empire Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
City of Hesperia 25 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
70 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Fontana Housing Authority Type Housing; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
71 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Hesperia Housing Authority Type Housing; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
72 Agency/ Group/ Organization City of Upland Housing Authority Type Housing; Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
73 Agency/ Group/ Organization Con Am
Type Service-Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
74 Agency/ Group/ Organization GRID Alternatives
Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
75 Agency/ Group/ Organization Jamboree Housing
Type Assisted Housing
City of Hesperia 26 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
76 Agency/ Group/ Organization National Community Renaissance Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
77 Agency/ Group/ Organization Palm Communities
Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
78 Agency/ Group/ Organization Quality Management Group Type Services-Housing; Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
79 Agency/ Group/ Organization RPM Company
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
80 Agency/ Group/ Organization RSG
Type Services-Housing; Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment; Homelessness Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
81 Agency/ Group/ Organization Siena Apartments
City of Hesperia 27 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
82 Agency/ Group/ Organization State of California Department of Housing and Community Development
Type State Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
83 Agency/ Group/ Organization Sunrise Terrace I & II
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
84 Agency/ Group/ Organization VPM Management
Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
85 Agency/ Group/ Organization Victor Valley Community Services Council Type Services-Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
HEALTH
86 Agency/ Group/ Organization Behavioral Awareness
Type Health Agency; Services-Children;
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Non-Housing Special Needs
City of Hesperia 28 Draft 2026 Annual Action Plan
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
87 Agency/ Group/ Organization Children's Dental Health Clinic Type Services-Health; Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
88 Agency/ Group/ Organization The Children’s Clinic
Type Services-Health, Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development Strategy How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
89 Agency/ Group/ Organization Kaiser Permanente
Type Services-Health; Business Leader; Civic Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation? Other-Non-Housing Community Development How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
90 Agency/ Group/ Organization Mental Health America of Los Angeles Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs; Other-Non-Housing
Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
91 Agency/ Group/ Organization Pueblo Y Salud
Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Other-Non-Housing Community Development
How was the Agency/ Group/
Organization consulted and what
are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the Consolidated Plan
process included consultation and engagement with City
residents, service providers, and selected departments
through surveys, meetings, and email.
92 Agency/ Group/ Organization The Richstone Family Center Type Services-Health