Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Hollister City Council
May 1, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
May 1, 2023
Body
Hollister City Council
Pages
11
Original file
762 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

MAYOR
Mia Casey

COUNCIL MEMBERS
Rick Perez, District 1
Rolan Resendiz, District 2
Dolores Morales, District 3
Tim Burns, District 4

INTERIM CITY MANAGER
David Mirrione

CITY ATTORNEY
Mary F. Lerner

CITY CLERK
Jennifer Woodworth

POLICE CHIEF
Carlos Reynoso

CITY TREASURER
Gordon Machado

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Special and Regular Meeting
May 1, 2023
Special Meeting 5:30 PM
Regular Meeting 6:30 PM

CITY OF HOLLISTER

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
375 FIFTH STREET
HOLLISTER, CA 95023
(831) 636-4300
www.hollister.ca.gov/

NOTICE TO PUBLIC

Persons who wish to address the City Council are asked to complete a speaker’s card and give it to the City Clerk before addressing the City Council. Those who wish to ad dress the City Council on an agenda item will be heard when the presiding officer calls for comments from the audience. City related items not on the agenda will be heard under the Public Input section of the agenda. Following recognition persons desiring to speak are requested to advance to the podium and state their name and address. If you are joining us by Zoom, please click on the bottom of your screen to raise your hand. If you are joining us by Zoom using a cell phone, please press *9. After hearing audience comments, the public portion of the meeting will be closed, and the matter brought to the City Council for discussion.

Requests to make presentations to the City Council should be submitted to the City Clerk’s Office at least ten days before the City Council meeting. It is customary for City staff members to review such matters before the formal presentation so that the City Council may have the benefit of all available data. PowerPoint presentations must be presented to the City Clerk by noon on the day of the City Council meeting.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION NOTICE
The public may watch the meeting via live stream at:

City of Hollister Website
http://hollisterca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Default.aspx

Community Media Access Partnership (CMAP):
http://cmaptv.com/watch/

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 2 of 11

City of Hollister YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_SKHetqbOiiz5mH6XgpYw/featured

City of Hollister Facebook Live at:
https://www.facebook.com/cityofhollister

Public Participation:

The public may attend meetings.

NOTICE: The City Council will hold its public meetings in person, with a virtual option for public participation based on availability. The City of Hollister utilizes Zoom teleconferencing technology for virtual public participation; however, we make no representation or warranty of any kind, regarding the adequacy, reliability, or availability of the use of this platform in this manner. Participation by members of the public through this means is at their own risk. (Zoom teleconferencing may not be available at all meetings.)

If you wish to make a public comment remotely during the meeting, please use the zoom registration link below:

https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_MNOr95ZCQrWzERqd5zRuwQ

CALL TO ORDER
CLOSED SESSION - 5:30 P.M.

Public Comment (limited to any item listed on the Closed Session agenda) Closed Session will be held by the City Council of the City of Hollister to discuss the following matters:

1. Conference with Labor Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency designated representatives: (Interim City Manager David Mirrione and Administrative Services Director Casey Estorga)
Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Union, Local 521; Hollister Firefighters Union, Local 3395; Hollister Mid-Management Association; Hollister Peace Officer Association; and un-represented employees in classifications designated as Executive Management and Confidential

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION per Government Code Section 54956.9
Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) or (3) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 1 case

3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS per Government Code section 54956.8

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 3 of 11

Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Property: 190 Maple Street, Hollister, CA 95023
Agency negotiator: Interim City Manager David Mirrione
Negotiating parties: Renee Kunz

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

VERIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING

CLOSED SESSION - REPORT OUT

PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS

1. Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation - Sarah Nordwick (City Clerk)

2. Proclamation Honoring the 35th Anniversary of Bill’s Bullpen (City Clerk)

3. Proclamation Declaring May as Poppy Month and May 27, 2023 as Poppy Day (City Clerk)
A. CONSENT ITEMS
All items listed under consent agenda will be enacted by one motion authorizing actions indicated for those items so designated. Th ere will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the City Council, a staff member, or a member of the public.

Consent items are numbers: A1 through A15.

1. The minutes of the Regular Meeting of City Council April 17, 2023

2. WARRANT REGISTER - MAY 1, 2023 - AP (Finance)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register(s)

RECOMMENDATION: The City Council will ratify and approve the following Warrant Registers for the General-Special-Enterprise-Assessments funds dated:

 2023-03-20, in the amount of $ 494,045.16
 2023-03-23, in the amount of $ 99,180.56
 2023-03-24, in the amount of $ 3,435,794.08
 2023-03-28, in the amount of $ 380,662.14
 2023-03-29, in the amount of $ 655,364.86
 2023-03-29, in the amount of $ 354,550.76

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 4 of 11

 2023-03-31, in the amount of $ 608,294.25

3. Claim Against the City - Filed by Dana & Larry Lopez (City Clerk) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Dana & Larry Lopez filed a claim against the City on April 12, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of this claim and seeks authorization to send the notice of rejection to the claimant.

4. Resolution No. 2023-67 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister Approving the Temporary Street Closure of Various Streets for the Annual Portuguese Heritage Festival Parade, May 28,2023 (City Clerk) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This resolution authorizes the temporary closure of various streets for the Annual Portuguese Heritage Festival Parade on May 28, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the temporary closure of various streets for the Annual Portuguese Heritage Festival Parade on May 28, 2023.

5. Resolution No. 2023-68 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister approving temporary street closures of various streets for the City of Hollister Recreation Department, in partnership with the San Benito County Safe Kids Coalition's Annual Kids at the Park Event on June 14, 2023 from 7:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. (Recreation)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This resolution will authorize the temporary closures of 7th Street between West and Powell Street and West Street between 6th and 7th Street for the Annual Kids at the Park event to be held on Wednesday, June 14, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the temporary street closures of 7th Street between West and Powell Street and West Street between 6th and 7th Street for the Annual Kids at the Park event to be held on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, for the Annual Kids at the Park event.

6. Ratify Appointment to Parks & Recreation Commission (City Clerk) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The Parks & Recreation Commission currently has a vacancy for District 4. Staff requests the City Council ratify the appointment of Julio Rodriguez to fill the commission vacancy.

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 5 of 11

RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the appointment of Julio Rodriguez to fill the vacancy for the Parks & Recreation Commission District 4 seat.

7. Resolution No. 2023-69 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister authorizing the display of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag May 4 - May 7, 2023 at City Hall (City Clerk) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: At the March 6, 2023 Council meeting, students requested to display the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag at City Hall for a future date. By consensus, a majority of the City Council approved the request and directed staff to return once the dates had been set.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the display of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag May 4, 2023 through May 7, 2023, at City Hall.

8. Letter of Support - Senate Bill 524 (Caballero): Test and Treat (City Clerk) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Senator Caballero’s office recently contacted City staff to request letters of support for three bills to improve healthcare accessibility in rural California and reduce financial strains on hospitals.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve a letter of support for SB 524 (Caballero):

Test and Treat to be sent to the Senate Committee on Business, Professions, and Economic Development.

9. Letter of Support - Senate Bill 621 (Caballero): Health care coverage:
biosimilar drugs (City Clerk)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Senator Caballero’s office recently contacted City staff to request letters of support for three bills to improve healthcare accessibility in rural California and reduce financial strains on hospitals.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve a letter of support for SB 621 (Caballero):

Health care coverage: biosimilar drugs to be sent to the Senate Committee on Health.

10. Letter of Support - Senate Bill 870 (Caballero): Hospital Closure Prevention Act (City Clerk)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Senator Caballero’s office recently contacted City staff to request letters of support for three bills to improve healthcare accessibility in rural California and reduce financial strains on hospitals.

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 6 of 11

RECOMMENDATION: Approve a letter of support for SB 870 (Caballero):

Hospital Closure Prevention Act to be sent to the Senate Committee on Health.

11. Resolution No. 2023-70 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister Approving the Contribution for Two Years in an Amount Not to Exceed $5,000 per Fiscal Year to United Way of San Benito County 2-1-1 (City Clerk)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The City Council will consider a resolution to approve $10,000 in funding, over a period of two years, for United Way 2-1- 1 of San Benito County.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving $10,000 in funding, $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2023-24, for United Way 2-1-1 of San Benito County.

12. Resolution No. 2023-71 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister rejecting the bid received on April 10, 2023 for CIP C1816 West Gateway Improvement Project (Engineering) (Engineering) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This resolution will reject the bid received on April 10, 2023 for CIP C1816 West Gateway Improvement Project.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution rejecting the bid received on April 10, 2023 for the CIP C1816 West Gateway Improvement Project.

13. Resolution No. 2023-72 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister Adopting the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (City Attorney)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Adoption of the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act will simplify and expedite public project contracting.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution adopting the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.

B. CITY OF HOLLISTER AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None.

C. PUBLIC INPUT
This is the time for anyone in the audience to speak on any item not on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the council. Speaker cards are available in the lobby, and are

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 7 of 11

to be completed and given to the City Clerk before speaking. When the City Clerk calls your name, please come to the podium, state your name and city for the record, and speak to the City Council. If you are joining us by Zoom, please click on the bottom of your screen to raise your hand. If you are joining us by Zoom using a cell phone, please press *9. Each speaker will be limited to three (3) minutes with a maximum of 30 minutes per subject. Please note that state law prohibits the City Council from discussing or taking action on any item not on the agenda.

D. PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES AND COMMUNICATIONS

1. City Manager Report
Receive report from City Manager.

2. Trainings and Conferences
Receive reports from staff on Training and Conferences.

E. PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. Ordinance No. 2033 An ordinance of the City of Hollister Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-4 to Adopt Chapter 17.36 Inclusionary Housing Program (Planning)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: An Ordinance to Adopt a new Chapter 17.36, Inclusionary Housing Program, into the Zoning Ordinance, which would require new residential development to provide 20% affordable housing units on-site.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council introduce an Ordinance to adopt Chapter 17.36 Inclusionary Housing Program, hold a public hearing, and schedule a second reading of the Ordinance for the May 15, 2023 City Council meeting.

2. Resolution No. 2023-75 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister Declaring the Condition of Certain Properties to Constitute a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Abatement of Weeds Thereon, and Conducting a Hearing for the Receipt of Objection to the Proposed Abatement (Fire)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This public hearing is to hear objections to the proposed abatement of weeds and other flammable materials existing on said properties; (Exhibit “A”) and written notice of the proposed abatement and hearing date was mailed to all affected property owners in the manner and form required by law.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution declaring the condition of certain properties to constitute a public nuisance, ordering the abatement of weeds

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 8 of 11

thereon, and noticing a public hearing for the receipt of objections to the proposed abatement.

F. INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1. Resolution No. 2023-74 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments within the Landscape and Lighting District No. 93-1 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 and giving notice of and setting the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Engineering)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Consideration of declaring the intention of the City Council to levy and collect the annual assessment for Landscape & Lighting District 93-1; setting the time and place of, and giving notice for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution declaring the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments for Landscape and Lighting District No. 93-1 for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 and giving notice of and setting the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

2. Ordinance No. 2034 An ordinance of the City of Hollister Adding Chapter 7 to Title 3 of the Hollister Municipal Code to provide contracting procedures under the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act. (City Attorney) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Introduction of an ordinance to codify the public project contracting procedures required under the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.

RECOMMENDATION: Introduce an ordinance adding Chapter 7 to Title 3 of the Hollister Municipal Code to provide contracting procedures under the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.

3. Resolution No. 2023-76 a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister to Adopt a Policy Regarding Council Requests for Future Agenda Items and Information (City Clerk)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: At the January 17, 2023 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to draft a policy outlining the process for the Councilmembers to add items to a future Council meeting agenda and to

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 9 of 11

request information from staff. At the April 17, 2023 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to return with a policy and provided direction to be included in the policy.

RECOMMENDATION: Discuss and adopt a resolution approving the City Council policy entitled: “Council Requests for Future Agenda Items and Information”.

4. Resolution No. 2023-73 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister approving an agreement to nominate the City’s 2022 City Wide Slurry Seal Project to the California Transportation Commission for receipt of Local Partnership Program Formulaic (LPP-F) funds totaling $600,000 and approve an agreement exchanging $600,000 of the City’s Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds for $600,000 LPP-F funds, and sub-allocate the STBG funds to the local jurisdictions using the COG’s adopted formula. (City Manager)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The Council of San Benito County Governments (COG) is eligible to receive funds through the Local Partnership Program - Formulaic (LPP-F) program as taxing authority for Measure G, which was approved by San Benito voters in 2018, with revenues dedicated solely to transportation. COG staff coordinated with the City of San Juan Bautista, City of Hollister, and County of San Benito to identify an eligible project to receive LPP-F funds.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Approve agreement with the Council of San Benito Governments to receive Local Partnership Program Formulaic (LPP-F) Funds totaling $600,000; and

2. Approve agreement with the Council of San Benito Governments to exchange Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) Funds for LPP-F Funds, and sub-allocate STBG Funds to local jurisdictions; and

3. Authorize City Manager to execute the LPP-F and STBG agreements with the Council of San Benito Governments.

G. REPORTS OF CITY COUNCIL, OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES

1. Presentation regarding impact fees for the Twin Oaks Subdivision (Engineering)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: A presentation regarding Impact Fees for the Twin Oaks Subdivision will be provided as requested by the City of Hollister City Council.

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 10 of 11

RECOMMENDATION: Receive the presentation and possibly discuss and provide direction regarding Impact Fees for the Twin Oaks Subdivision.

2. Reports from City Council Members regarding Committees on which they serve
Receive oral reports from members regarding the activities of various Ad Hoc and Standing City Council Committees.

3. Informational Reports from City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk and Staff
Receive informational reports from the City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Chief of Police, City Clerk, and other Staff as applicable.

H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

1. Updated City Council Projects (City Manager)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: City Council requested a list of agenda items, work items, and updates requested by the City Council to staff to be created and placed on each agenda under Unfinished Business.

RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report and hold a discussion, if desired.

I. NEW BUSINESS
None.

J. MISCELLANEOUS
None.

K. CITY OF HOLLISTER AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY OF THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None.

L. ADJOURNMENT

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 636-4300. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to attempt to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II].

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 375 Fifth Street, Hollister, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to noon, 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. (City Hall is closed between 12:00 and 1:00 p.m.)

City Council Monday, May 1, 2023 Page 11 of 11

Notice to anyone attending any public meeting: The meeting may be broadcast live on Cable Channel 17 and/or videotaped or photographed. Recent City Council meetings may also be viewed at www.CMAP.com and periodically on Cable Channel 17.

The next City Council Meetings are scheduled as follows:

Regular City Council Meeting -- Monday, May 15, 2023, at 6:30 PM Regular City Council Meeting -- Monday, June 5, 2025, at 6:30 PM Regular City Council Meeting --Tuesday*, June 20, 2023, at 6:30 PM (*Due to Juneteenth Holiday, observed on Monday, June 19th)
Legislative Recess -- No regular City Council Meetings in July

Sarah Nordwick

C E R T I F I C A T E

THANKING HER FOR HER WORK TO SUPPORT THE HOLLISTER COMMUNITY

AND ITS RESIDENTS IN THE WAKE OF THE RECENT FLOODING

O F A P P R E C I A T I O N

J E N N I F E R W O O D W O R T H , C I T Y C L E R K M I A C A S E Y , M A Y O R

T H I S C E R T I F I C A T E I S P R O U D L Y P R E S E N T E D T O

1.a
Packet Pg. 12

PROCLAMATION
Honoring the 35th Anniversary of
Bill’s Bullpen

WHEREAS, in December 1987 Bill Mifsud Sr., opened Bill’s Bullpen and Bill Mifsud Jr. took over shortly after; and

WHEREAS, Bill’s Bullpen survived the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake, the 1990s mortgage meltdown, and COVID-19 shutdown, never failing to provide services to customers of all ages; and

WHEREAS, Bill’s Bullpen has been an integral part of the Hollister community for over 35 years, donating to various organizations, sports groups, and schools; and

WHEREAS, Bill’s Bullpen carries more than 25,000 comic books, sports apparel, sports cards, non-sports cards, shirts, caps, figurines, pennants, and more; and

WHEREAS, the San Benito County Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau recognized Bill’s Bullpen as the Retail Business of the Year in 2015; and

WHEREAS, Bill’s Bullpen helps inspire reading in children by participating in an annual comic book giveaway and gives back to the community by sponsoring local little league teams; and

WHEREAS, Bill’s Bullpen will continue to be the family fun hobby store in Hollister providing something for residents of all ages and backgrounds serving future generations to come;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mia Casey, Mayor of the City of Hollister, on behalf of the entire City Council, do hereby recognize and congratulate Bill’s Bullpen on its 35th Anniversary.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the seal of the City of Hollister this 1st day of May, 2023.

_______________________________
Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

2.a
Packet Pg. 13

Proclamation
Declaring May as Poppy Month and
May 27, 2023 as Memorial Poppy Day

WHEREAS, America is the land of freedom, preserved and protected willingly and freely by citizen soldiers; and

WHEREAS, millions who have answered the call to arms have died on the field of battle; and

WHEREAS, a nation at peace must be reminded of the price of war and the debt owed to those who have died in war; and

WHEREAS, the red poppy has been designated as a symbol of sacrifice of lives in all wars; and

WHEREAS, the American Legion Auxiliary has pledged to remind America annually of this debt through the distribution of the memorial flower;

NOW,THEREFORE, I, Mia Casey, Mayor of the City of Hollister, on behalf of the entire City Council,do hereby proclaim this 27th day of May 2023, as MEMORIAL POPPY DAY and ask that all citizens pay tribute to those who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the name of freedom by wearing the Memorial Poppy on this day.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the official seal of City of Hollister this 1st day of May, 2023.

_______________________________
Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

3.a
Packet Pg. 14

CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF HOLLISTER

Minutes of Special and Regular Meeting
April 17, 2023

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION NOTICE

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Casey called the special meeting of the City Council of the City of Hollister to order at 5:00 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 P.M.

Public Comment (limited to any item listed on the Closed Session agenda)

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 5:00 p.m.

There were no speakers for the closed session items.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 5:00 p.m.

Closed Session will be held by the City Council of the City of Hollister to discuss the following matters:

City Attorney Lerner read the closed session item titles.

Councilmember Resendiz arrived at 5:01 p.m.

Councilmember Resendiz moved, and Councilmember Perez seconded the motion to adjourn into closed session. Motion carried 5-0-0.

1. Conference with Labor Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: (Interim City Manager David Mirrione and Administrative Services Director Casey Estorga)
Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Union, Local 521; Hollister Firefighters Union, Local 3395; Hollister Mid-Management Association; Hollister Peace Officer Association; and un-represented employees in classifications designated as Executive Management and Confidential

2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS per Government Code section 54956.8
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
Property: 190 Maple Street, Hollister, CA 95023
Agency negotiator: Interim City Manager David Mirrione
Negotiating parties: Renee Kunz

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 2 of 18

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9) National Prescription Opiate Litigation, No. 1:
17-md-2804 (N.D. Ohio) (Walmart, Walgreens, CVS, Teva, Allergan)

4. Consultation of Public Employment Government Code Section 54957 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Interim City Manager

The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Hollister adjourned at 6:35 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Burns led the Pledge of Allegiance.

ROLL CALL
The regular meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor Mia Casey on April, 17, 2023 at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers at 375 Fifth Street, Hollister, CA 95023.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Mia Casey Mayor Present
Rick Perez District 1 Present
Rolan Resendiz District 2 Present
Dolores Morales District 3 Present
Tim Burns District 4 Present
Mary F. Lerner City Attorney Present
Jennifer Woodworth City Clerk Present
Carlos Reynoso Police Chief Present
David Mirrione Interim City Manager Present
Gordon Machado City Treasurer Absent

VERIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING
City Clerk Woodworth reported the agenda for the City Council of the City of Hollister special and regular meetings of April 17, 2023 was posted on the bulletin board at City Hall on Apr il 12, 2023 at 4:40 p.m. per Government Code Section 54954.2.

CLOSED SESSION - REPORT OUT
City Attorney Lerner reported in closed session, Councilmember Burns moved, and Vice Mayor Morales seconded the motion to opt into the national prescription opiate litigation.

PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS

1. Proclamation Congratulating Cole Seymour and Eliana Salcedo for their Success at the Fresno Folkstyle State Championships

Vice Mayor Morales read and presented the proclamation to congratulating Cole Seymour and Eliana Salcedo on their success at the Fresno Folkstyle State Championships.

2. Proclamation Declaring May as Water Awareness Month

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 3 of 18

Mayor Casey read and presented the proclamation to Shawn Novack with the Water Resources Association.

A. COUNCIL BUSINESS

1. Consideration of Confidential Investigation Report From The Independent Investigation Pertaining To The Conduct Of
Councilmember Rick Perez Towards Other Councilmembers and Citizens

Yesenia Carillo with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore reviewed the findings of the independent investigation pertaining to the conduct of Councilmember Rick Perez towards other councilmembers and citizens and potential City Council actions in response to the report.

Councilmember Resendiz inquired regarding various elements of the investigative report and the City Council's Code of Conduct related to treatment of City employees.

Councilmember Burns requested and received additional information regarding the investigation process. Councilmember Burns requested the independent investi gator provide the recordings and other information gathered as part of the investigation process.

Councilmember Morales inquired why background information was not included in the investigative report and stated it should have been included. Additionally , Councilmember Morales stated her statement included in the investigative report was not valid.

Councilmember Perez inquired why the investigator is not present to respond to City Council questions.

Ms. Carillo stated it is not common practice to question the independent investigator as part of the investigation process.

Mayor Casey expressed concern regarding and inquired why unverified anecdotal quotes were included in the report from City staff and community members who were not in attendance at the closed session.

Ms. Carillo stated she believed additional witnesses were contacted at the request of Councilmember Resendiz.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 7:20 p.m.

G.W. Devon Pack supported Councilmember Perez and his commitment and service to the Hollister community. Mr. Pack commented on the possibility of provocation of an individual by use of "fighting words."

Clark Stone supported Councilmember Perez's support for the community and his constituents. Mr. Stone stated the City Council should consider the personal situation Councilmember Perez was enduring when the incidents occurred and the negative atmosphere among the members of City Council.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 4 of 18

John Freeman spoke regarding Councilmember Perez's service on local committees including the Association of Monterey Bay Governments and Integrated Waste Management for San Benito County and spoke regarding Councilmember Perez's commitment to serving his constituents.

Bea Gonzales spoke regarding Councilmember Perez's requests for help for his son, including to the members of the San Benito County Board of Supervisors.

Jeanie Wallace expressed concern regarding the history of strife among the members of the Hollister City Council and encouraged the Council to seek collegial working relationships with each other.

Larry Rebecchi spoke in support of the need for more respect among the City Council members and in society.

Peter Hernandez spoke in support of unity, respect, and patience. Mr. Hernandez stated the investigation was faulty and suggested the Hollister Code of Ethics should be revised to be less antagonistic.

Tony Avilla supported Councilmember Perez and commented on his integrity, compassion, and demonstration of responsibility. Mr. Avilla spoke against the humiliation aimed at Councilmember Perez.

Carol Lenoir commented on her experiences in previously serving on the City Council and working with the current and former members of Council.

Linda Lampe shared her experiences in knowing Councilmember Perez and his family and supported standing up for those who make mistakes and to forgive them.

Celeste Toledo-Bocanegra commented on a pattern of incidents involving Councilmember Resendiz and asked the Council to not discipline Councilmember Perez.

Elia Salinas commented on past behavior by Councilmember Resendiz and former Mayor Velazquez towards former councilmembers and members of the community.

Felipe Ordanez stated he is upset the independent investigator is not present for the meeting. Mr. Ordanez supported Councilmember Perez and thanked him for his service to the community.

Matthew Rojas stated the City Council Code of Conduct was violated and the City Council should abide by their code of conduct.

Jose Fernandez supported getting the Council's business done instead o f wasting time on internal arguments.

Juan Gutierrez stated Councilmember Perez used his position to request services for his son ahead of other members of the public.

Stacie McGrady stated people are best because of their humanity and stated the City Council Code of Conduct should be treated as a baseline, and empathy should be applied.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 5 of 18

Julio Rodriguez stated if the report substantiated the claims, then the City Council should follow its code of conduct.

Sandy Patterson supported Councilmember Perez.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 7:59 p.m.

Councilmember Resendiz stated staff, members of the public, and members of City Council should be treated respectfully. Councilmember Resendiz commented on more recent comments and previous behavior by Councilmember Perez and stated the City Council needs to hold him accountable. Councilmember Resendiz supported censuring Councilmember Perez and removing him from his committee assignments.

Councilmember Morales commented on previous behavior and comments by Councilmember Resendiz towards current and former members of the City Council.

Councilmember Morales expressed concern regarding the independent investigation process and report.

Councilmember Perez spoke regarding his previous inability to be allowed to speak on behalf of his constituents under the previous mayor. Councilmember Perez supported moving forward to allow the City's business to be completed.

Councilmembers Burns expressed concern regarding the independent investigation process and cost. Councilmember Burns stated his support for the City Council Code of Conduct and recommended Councilmember Perez review and recommit to the Code of Conduct. Additionally, Councilmember Burns requested the requirements for members of the City Council to hold office be reviewed and suggested an apology be issued to the community and to San Benito County Supervisor Kollin Kosmicki.

Mayor Casey expressed her concerns regarding the contents of the independent investigation report and spoke in support for the need for empathy.

Mayor Casey moved to issue a verbal warning to Councilmember Perez and requested a roll call vote.

Councilmember Morales seconded the motion.

By a roll call vote, the motion carried 3-1-1 (Councilmember Resendiz opposed and Councilmember Perez abstained).

The City Council recessed at 8:16 p.m. and reconvened at 8:29 p.m. with all councilmembers present.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 6 of 18

RESULT: Adopted [3 to 1]
MOTION: Mia Casey
SECOND: Dolores Morales
AYES: Casey, Morales, Burns
NOES: Resendiz
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN: Perez
ABSENT:

B. CONSENT ITEMS
All items listed under the consent agenda will be enacted in one motion authorizing the actions indicated for those items so designated.

Council member Burns pulled Items B6, B10, B14, and B16 from the consent agenda.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 8:30 p.m.

There were no speakers for the consent agenda items.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 8:30 p.m.

Councilmember Burns moved, and Councilmember Morales seconded the motion to approve the consent agenda items, except for items B6, B10, B14, and B16. Motion carried 5-0-0.

RESULT: Adopted [Unanimous]
MOTION: Tim Burns
SECOND: Dolores Morales
AYES: Casey, Perez, Resendiz, Morales, Burns
NOES:

RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Consent items are numbers: A1 through A16.

1. City Council - Regular Meeting - Apr 3, 2023 6:30 PM

2. Claim Against the City - Filed by Natmar L.P.

3. Claim Against the City - Filed by Gilberto Garcia

4. Ordinance No. 2032 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Hollister Amending Section 1.18.060 of Chapter 1.18 of the City of Hollister Municipal Code Relating to Administrative Citation Hearing Requests

5. Ratify Appointments to fill Commission Vacancies

6. Item B6 was moved to Items Pulled from the Agenda

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 7 of 18

7. Resolution No. 2023-56 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister Designating Surveillance Grid Integration Inc. as the Sole Source Vendor for the City of Hollister Public Safety Camera System

8. Resolution No. 2023-57 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister authorizing the Interim City Manager to enter into an agreement for professional services with Regional Government Services (RGS) for a term expiring June 30, 2024 and an amount not to exceed $75,000.

9. Resolution No. 2023-58 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister to accept the amended contract for professional services agreement with N. Ramirez Landscape and Construction to include additional landscaping maintenance services

10. Item B10 was moved to Items Pulled from the Agenda

11. Resolution No. 2023-60 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister to surplus certain identified vehicles and equipment, as listed in Exhibit [A], and authorize the City Manager to execute a Memo of Understanding with GovDeals, Inc. for the purpose of disposing said surplus through online auction.

12. Resolution No. 2023-61 2023-61: National Night Out Street Closure

13. Military Equipment in Use at the Hollister Police Department Report

14. Item B14 was moved to Items Pulled from the Agenda

15. Resolution No. 2023-63 A resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister approving the Initiation of Proceedings for the levy and collection of annual assessments for Landscape and Lighting District 93-1 and order the City Engineer to prepare and file the required report with the City Clerk

16. Item B16 was moved to Items Pulled from the Agenda

ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
Item B6. Resolution No. 2023-55: Agreement For Hearing Officer Services

Councilmember Burns requested and received information regarding the contract and Jeffrey Miller's qualifications.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 8:37 p.m.

There were no speakers for this item.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 8:37 p.m.

Councilmember Burns expressed concern regarding a perceived conflict of interest by contracting with a former Hollister Police Chief and concern that Mr. Miller does not live in California. Councilmember Burns stated he will not support the renewal of the contract.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 8 of 18

Police Chief Reynoso reported other former employees have also served as administrative hearing officers and stated their familiarity with Hollister Municipal Code is helpful to the process.

Councilmember Morales moved, and Councilmember Perez seconded the motion to adopt Resolution 2023-55. Motion carried 3-2-0 (Councilmembers Resendiz and Burns opposed).

RESULT: Adopted [3 to 2]
MOTION: Dolores Morales
SECOND: Rick Perez
AYES: Casey, Perez, Morales
NOES: Resendiz, Burns
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Item B10. Resolution No. 2023-59: Amendment Maintenance Agreement- Smith and Enright Landscaping

Councilmember Burns supported hiring City staff to complete landscaping work rather than contracting with an external service.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 8:46 p.m.

There were no speakers for this item.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 8:46 p.m.

Councilmember Resendiz moved, and Mayor Casey seconded the motion to adopt Resolution 2023-59. Motion fails 2-3-0 (Councilmembers Perez, Burns, and Morales opposing).

RESULT: Defeated [2 to 3]
MOTION: Rolan Resendiz
SECOND: Mia Casey
AYES: Casey, Resendiz
NOES: Perez, Morales, Burns
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Item B14. Resolution No. 2023-62: Renaming of Hollister Community Center

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 8:48 p.m.

Elia Salinas supported renaming the Hollister Community Center for Pauline Valdivia and proposed issuing a proclamation when the building is renamed. Ms. Salinas spoke regarding the many contributions by Ms. Valdivia to the Hollister community.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 9 of 18

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 8:50 p.m.

Councilmember Burns moved, and Councilmember Perez seconded the motion to adopt Resolution 2023-62. Motion carried 5-0-0.

RESULT: Adopted [Unanimous]
MOTION: Tim Burns
SECOND: Dolores Morales
AYES: Casey, Perez, Resendiz, Morales, Burns
NOES:

RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Item B16. Resolution No. 2023-64: Sally Street Post-Construction Traffic Study

Councilmember Burns commented he did not feel a post-project traffic calming study was needed for Sally Street.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 8:54 p.m.

Julio Rodriguez supported the City staff's recommendations for traffic calming measures.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 8:55 p.m.

Councilmember Morales moved, and Councilmember Perez seconded the motion to adopt Resolution 2023-64. Motion carried 3-2-0 (Councilmember Resendiz and Burns opposed).

RESULT: Adopted [3 to 2]
MOTION: Dolores Morales
SECOND: Rick Perez
AYES: Casey, Perez, Morales
NOES: Resendiz, Burns
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

C. CITY OF HOLLISTER AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
No items.

D. PUBLIC INPUT
Elia Salinas commented on the lack of Committee assignments for Councilmember Burns. Ms.

Salinas commented on previous negative comments made by Council member Resendiz and

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 10 of 18

asked that Councilmember Burns review the lawsuit complaint related to the lawsuit initiated by Irma Gonzalez and herself.

Stacie McGrady invited anyone interested to apply to serve on the San Benito County Civil Grand Jury.

E. PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES AND COMMUNICATIONS

1. City Manager Report

No report.

2. Trainings and Conferences

Interim City Manager Mirrione reported City Clerk Jennifer Woodworth, Community Services Director William Via, and Police Chief Carlos Reynoso recently completed the Professional Development Academy’s High Performance Leadership training.

F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items.

G. INTRODUCTION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1. Resolution No. 2023-65 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister Approving a Regulatory Permit for Monterey Bay Alternative Medicine Hollister, Inc. to Operate a Cannabis Dispensary at 773 San Felipe Road (APN 051-100-032-000)

Cannabis Program Manager Maria Mendez provided the staff report.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 9:06 p.m.

Elia Salinas commented regarding the delay in approving the regulatory permit and expressed concern regarding potential sale of the business.

Victor Gomez supported approval of the regulatory permit stating the project was ready to move forward and operate.

Matthew Rojas supported additional businesses starting in the City, including cannabis dispensaries.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 9:12 p.m.

Councilmember Burns suggested including a requirement that the business op erate within two years, which could be extended for cause.

Councilmember Resendiz supported approval and requested a condition that the applicant return in one year to request an extension.

Mr. Gomez, representative for the applicant, provided additional information regarding the project and reported the City Council reviews the regulatory permit on an annual basis.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 11 of 18

Councilmember Morales moved, and Councilmember Burns seconded the motion to adopt Resolution 2023-65. Motion carried 5-0-0.

Council recessed at 9:20 p.m. and reconvened at 9:31 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.

RESULT: Adopted [Unanimous]
MOTION: Dolores Morales
SECOND: Tim Burns
AYES: Casey, Perez, Resendiz, Morales, Burns
NOES:

RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

2. Resolution No. 2023-66 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hollister Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to Execute an Amendment to Task Order DS 2020-11 of the On-Call Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the Amount of $61,400.00, for Public Outreach and a Post-Construction Traffic Study Report of the Ladd Lane and Southside Road Traffic Calming Project

City Engineer Glen March provided the staff report.

Councilmember Burns opposed the recommendation and stated staff could conduct the public outreach.

Councilmember Resendiz supported gathering community feedback and requested staff perform the public outreach portion of the project.

Councilmember Morales expressed concern regarding the proposed cost for the Ladd Lane traffic calming study and public outreach.

Assistant City Engineer Mark Falgout provided additional information regarding the tasks included in the proposed Ladd Lane traffic calming study and public outreach project.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 9:40 p.m.

Carl DiLeonardo supported opportunities for public outreach and public input on the Ladd Lane traffic calming measures.

Scott Perry expressed frustration regarding the traffic calming measures installed on Ladd Lane.

Dave Wright expressed concern regarding the traffic calming measures installed on Ladd Lane and ongoing maintenance costs for them. Mr. Wright spoke against spending additional money regarding the project.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 12 of 18

Roger Cullumber commented on the difficulty to navigate Ladd Lane for trailers and raised safety concerns related to the traffic calming measures. Mr. Cullumber suggested using a different company to evaluate the traffic calming measures.

Julio Rodriguez suggested looking at alternative options to address traffic and traffic flow in the City.

Elia Salinas commented on public input provided as part of previous traffic calming measure projects. Ms. Salinas spoke against the proposed recommendation stating staff can assist with public outreach.

Jaye Eves supported traffic calming measures to slow traffic near Ladd Lane Elementary and shared safety violations she witnessed near Ladd Lane Elementary, which put residents and students in danger.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 9:57 p.m.

Councimember Burns suggested installation of a lighted crosswalk on Ladd Lane to help protect pedestrians rather than the existing traffic calming measures.

Councilmember Burns suggested holding a charrette with community members to discuss possible solutions to reduce traffic speed and protect students.

Councilmember Morales recommended staff drive Ladd Lane during school drop off and pickup hours to understand the difficulty of navigating Ladd Lane.

Mayor Casey requested the public outreach portion of the project move forward and suggested use of her discretionary budget to fund this portion of the project.

Mayor Casey moved to use her discretionary funds to fund the public outreach portion of the project.

Councilmember Morales supported removal of the traffic calming measures on Ladd Lane.

Councilmember Resendiz seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1-0 (Councilmember Burns opposed).

RESULT: Adopted as Amended [4 to 1]
MOTION: Mia Casey
SECOND: Rolan Resendiz
AYES: Casey, Perez, Resendiz, Morales
NOES: Burns
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

H. REPORTS OF CITY COUNCIL, OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES

1. Council to receive a Flock Safety Presentation with options for potential Purchase of Services

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 13 of 18

Caroline Fraher with Flock Safety provided a presentation describing the Flock public safety system.

Councilmember Resendiz recommended installation of surveillance system throughout the City and also at entrances and exits of the City.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 10:52 p.m.

Jaye Eves supported installation of a public safety system to help protect its citizens and preserve public safety.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 10:55 p.m.

Councilmember Morales supported including discussion of implementation of a public safety system as part of the budget process.

2. Presentation to the City Council of the City of Hollister Regarding the Impact Fees for the Twin Oaks Subdivision

Interim City Manager Mirrione reported this item is continued to a future Council meeting date.

3. Presentation Regarding Request for Waiver of Fees for 221 Hawkins Street

Development Services Director Christy Hopper provided the staff report and described the history of the project and a timeline of previous decisions.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 11:06 p.m.

Anne Hall provided information regarding the previous denial of a variance for the project, delays to the project, and subsequent denial of the project due to it not meeting zoning guidelines.

Kevin Henderson, Chair of the Hollister Planning Commission, discussed the review of the project by the Planning Commission and their recommendation to waive pending fees.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 11:13 p.m.

Councilmember Burns supported a refund of past fees but not a waiver of current fees.

Interim Planning Manager Eva Kelly provided additional information regarding review of the project by staff.

Councilmember Morales moved, and Councilmember Perez seconded the motion to direct staff to waive the City's fees paid for the previous project. Motion carried 3-2-0 (Councilmembers Resendiz and Burns opposed).

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 14 of 18

RESULT: Adopted [3 to 2]
MOTION: Dolores Morales
SECOND: Rick Perez
AYES: Casey, Perez, Morales
NOES: Resendiz, Burns
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

4. Placement of Items on Agenda by Council

Interim City Manager Mirrione provided the staff report reviewing the options for the Council to consider regarding placement of items on a future Council meeting agenda.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 11:38 p.m.

There were no speakers for this item.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 11:38 p.m.

Councilmembers Burns and Resendiz supported changing the requirement to require support from two Councilmembers rather than majority consensus.

Councilmember Morales and Mayor Casey supported option 3 as outlined in the staff report.

Mayor Casey suggested creation of a template for Councilmembers to use when requesting future Council agenda items.

Councilmember Morales moved, and Perez seconded the motion to direct staff to return with a policy as outlined in Option 3 of the staff report. Motion carried 3-2-0 (Coucilmembers Resendiz and Burns opposed).

RESULT: Adopted [3 to 2]
MOTION: Dolores Morales
SECOND: Rick Perez
AYES: Casey, Perez, Morales
NOES: Resendiz, Burns
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

5. Attorney Administrative Hearing Officers

City Attorney Lerner provided the staff report.

Councilmember Burns expressed concern regarding a potential perceived conflict of interest if the administrative hearing officer is a former Hollister employee.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 15 of 18

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 11:59 p.m.

Elia Salinas shared her previous experience regarding her participation in the administrative hearing process. Ms. Salinas supported informing the public of the availability of a hardship waiver for the administrative hearing fee.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 12:00 a.m.

Councilmember Resendiz supported requiring use of an attorney as the City's administrative hearing officer.

By majority consensus, the City Council directed staff to leave the City's requirements related to administrative hearing officers unchanged.

6. General Plan Advisory Committee Update

Item H6 was heard prior to Item H5.

Development Services Directors Hopper provided the staff report, including an update on the availability of the current General Plan Advisory Committee's membership to continue to serve.

David Early with Placeworks, the City's General Plan consultant, provided feedback on potential review of the draft General Plan Amendment by the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) and stated it will likely add time to the project.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 11:46 p.m.

Elia Salinas recommended a new General Plan Advisory Committee be formed to review the draft General Plan Amendment. Ms. Salinas suggested the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) have an opportunity to review the General Plan Amendment.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 11:48 p.m.

Councilmember Resendiz stated he does not support disbanding the GPAC.

Councilmember Burns stated he does not support disbanding the GPAC.

Mr. Early stated the General Plan Amendment team worked with LAFCO extensively on multiple occasions to review and provide feedback on the draft General Plan Amendment. LAFCO does not approve or act on the recommendations within General Plan Amendment prior to its adoption by the City.

Councilmember Morales moved, and Councilmember Perez seconded the motion to disband the GPAC and move forward with the General Plan Amendment process.

Mayor Casey expressed concern regarding the potential for a lack of a quorum for the GPAC due to vacancies, which would cause additional delays to the project.

Motion carried 3-2-0 (Councilmembers Resendiz and Burns opposed).

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 16 of 18

RESULT: Adopted [3 to 2]
MOTION: Dolores Morales
SECOND: Rick Perez
AYES: Casey, Perez, Morales
NOES: Resendiz, Burns
RECUSED:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

7. Discussion and Direction Regarding Increasing Councilmember/Mayor Compensation

City Attorney Lerner provided the staff report outlining the process for increasing Council compensation and the time frame during which any changes would be implemented.

Councilmember Burns requested and received clarification regarding whether members of the City Council can decline compensation and the cost of additional benefits.

Councilmember Morales supported raising Council compensation in order to allow more people to serve on the City Council.

Councilmember Burns suggested the Council look at their compensation in the context of the current labor negotiation process with the City's labor organizations.

Mayor Casey opened public comment at 12:22 a.m.

Elia Salinas spoke regarding the health benefits available to Councilmembers and supported increasing Council compensation.

Mayor Casey closed public comment at 12:25 a.m.

By majority consensus, the City Council directed staff to return with amendments to the Hollister Municipal Code to increase Council compensation to the maximum compensation allowed by the Government Code.

8. Reports from City Council Members regarding Committees on which they serve

Councilmember Resendiz reported his attendance at a meeting of the Water Resources Control Board.

Mayor Casey reported her attendance at a San Benito County Local Area Formation Comission (LAFCO) meeting and announced the LAFCO Executive Director resigned. Mayor Casey reported LAFCO entered into an interim contract for a new executive director. Mayor Casey attended a meeting of the Intergovernmental Committee.

9. Informational Reports from City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk and Staff

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 17 of 18

Councilmember Burns requested information regarding the procedure to allow the City to process concealed carry weapons permits, similar to Morgan Hill; requested additional information on City funding earmarked for sidewalk repairs, including ability of councilmembers to use their discretionary funds to repair sidewalks in their individual districts; and requested additional information regarding eligibility of Councilmember Perez to serve as elected official.

Councilmember Resendiz spoke in support of training for the City's advisory bodies and requested additional support for the commissions.

Councilmember Morales commented on the overgrown grass at the intersection of San Benito Street and Promise stating it needs to be mowed. Councilmember Morales supported use of councilmember discretionary funds for beautification projects; and requested the fire and police departments and other emergency medical service agencies review traffic calming projects before installation. Finally , Councilmember Morales requested staff return with information regarding campaign reform for Council discussion.

Councilmember Perez supported future discussion of campaign reform.

Mayor Casey reported she successfully held her first "Coffee with the Mayor" event at Fourth Street Eatery and attended the Poppy Jasper Film Fest event in Gilroy.

Mayor Casey requested the City Council Code of Conduct ordinance be brought back to the Council to discuss the investigation process to ensure it is equally applied to the entire City Council.

Interim City Manager Mirrione confirmed Council consensus to bring the following items back for Council consideration: potential use of City Council discretionary funds to repair sidewalks and complete beautification projects; a future Council discussion on campaign finance reform; and review of the City Council Code of Conduct.

I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

1. Updated City Council Projects

J. NEW BUSINESS
No items.

K. MISCELLANEOUS
No items.

L. CITY OF HOLLISTER AS THE SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY OF THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
No items.

M. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Morales moved, and Councilmember Perez seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 12:50 a.m. Motion carried 5-0-0.

City Council Monday, April 17, 2023 Page 18 of 18

Respectfully submitted,

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC
City Clerk

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 3, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

Finance
Cecilia Rodriguez, Management
Analyst

TITLE OF ITEM: WARRANT REGISTER - MAY 1, 2023 - AP

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register(s)

RECOMMENDATION: The City Council will ratify and approve the following Warrant Registers for the General-Special-Enterprise-Assessments funds dated:

 2023-03-20, in the amount of $ 494,045.16
 2023-03-23, in the amount of $ 99,180.56
 2023-03-24, in the amount of $ 3,435,794.08
 2023-03-28, in the amount of $ 380,662.14
 2023-03-29, in the amount of $ 655,364.86
 2023-03-29, in the amount of $ 354,550.76
 2023-03-31, in the amount of $ 608,294.25

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY:

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

CEQA:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Expense Approval Register - AP 3-20-23

2. Expense Approval Register - AP 3-23-23 (SPECIAL)

3. Expense Approval Register - AP 3-24-23 (SPECIAL)

4. Expense Approval Register - AP 3-28-23

5. Payroll Check Register - PYR 3-29-23

6. Expense Approval Register - DP 3-29-23

7. Expense Approval Register - AP 3-31-23

8. Budget Report -03-31-23_Meeting May 1, 2023

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.2
Packet Pg. 32

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:AGENDA ITEM: Consent
STUDY SESSION DATE: N/A
.TITLE OF ITEM: Warrant Register -- General-Special-Enterprise-Assessment Funds .BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register
.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the report and register(s) attached.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

FUND REGISTER TOTAL:$494,045.16
General Fund:$122,557.41
Special Fund:$7,310.51
Capital Projects Fund:$56,315.00
Enterprise Fund:$304,708.36
Assessment Fund:$2,925.96
Fund 850/851 $227.92
Amount Transferred to Payroll:$0.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DISBURSED:$494,045.16
DEPARTMENT:Administrative Services Department
CONTACT PERSON:

Valera Key, Accounting Technician II
PHONE NUMBER:(831) 636-4301 ext. 22
March 20, 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Sufficient resources are available in each of the funds listed above to satisfy the amount of the warrant and payroll disbursements on this register.

Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION_________________________________________________ Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst
A.2.a
Packet Pg. 33

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 34

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 35

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 36

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 37

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 38

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 39

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 40

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 41

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 42

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 43

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 44

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 45

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 46

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 47

A.2.a
Packet Pg. 48

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:AGENDA ITEM: Consent
STUDY SESSION DATE: N/A
.TITLE OF ITEM: Warrant Register -- General-Special-Enterprise-Assessment Funds .BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register
.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the report and register(s) attached.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

FUND REGISTER TOTAL:$99,180.56
General Fund:$70,296.91
Special Fund:$3,141.08
Capital Projects Fund:$0.00
Enterprise Fund:$25,742.57
Assessment Fund:$0.00
Fund 850/851 $0.00
Amount Transferred to Payroll:$0.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DISBURSED:$99,180.56
DEPARTMENT:Administrative Services Department
CONTACT PERSON:

Valera Key, Accounting Technician II
PHONE NUMBER:(831) 636-4301 ext. 22
March 23, 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Sufficient resources are available in each of the funds listed above to satisfy the amount of the warrant and payroll disbursements on this register.

Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION_________________________________________________ Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst
A.2.b
Packet Pg. 49

3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 1 of 10
Expense Approval Register
City of Hollister Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number Fund: 101 - General Fund
249.104TH ST EATERY-LUNCH VOLUN…02/22/2023MARRA, L. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015

62.65LUCKY/SNACKS VOLUNTEERS-…02/22/2023MARRA, L. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015

30.36SP BALLOONS/BALLOONS-CUP…02/22/2023MEDINA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015 431.77IMPRINT.COM/LANYARDS9400…02/22/2023MEDINA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015

14.19AMAZON/VALENTINES DECOR…02/22/2023MEDINA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015

18.46AMAZON/GLOW STICKS-ST PA…02/22/2023MEDINA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015

31.93AMAZON/HOSPORA BANDAGE…02/22/2023MEDINA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015 364.00SAN FELIPE STORAGE/F18,F19,…02/22/2023MEDINA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710045 364.00SAN FELIPE STORAGE/F18,F19,…02/22/2023MEDINA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-710045

2.00RENEE PERALES - FILING OF O…02/23/2023PERALES, R. 12/22U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4010-722010

50.00RENEE PERALES - FILING OF O…02/23/2023PERALES, R. 12/22U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4010-722010

6.45TRANSCRIPT COPIES-PARCHM…03/02/2023AGUILERA, T. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

10.00TRANSCRIPT COPIES-PARCHM…03/02/2023AGUILERA, T. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

50.18HOME DEPOT - SILVER/BROW…03/02/2023AMESCUA, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015

12.88FUEL FOR SELMA PD FUNERAL…03/02/2023ANDERSON, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

21.48FUEL FOR SELMA PD FUNERAL…03/02/2023ANDERSON, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

42.08FUEL FOR TRAINING-7603/02/2023ANDERSON, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 929.95LODGING FOR TRAINING-HAM…03/02/2023ANDERSON, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 114.66ACE HARDWARE - EXPLORER G…03/02/2023BEDOLLA, C 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015

87.56NFPA -NFPA211, STANDARD F…03/02/2023BEDOLLA, C 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710050

40.00MARIPOSA TAX & BUSINESS - …03/02/2023BEDOLLA, C 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-730000

14.99ZOOM - MEMBERSHIP - FEBR…03/02/2023BEDOLLA, C 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-740027

75.00RESEARCH TOOL FOR DETECTI…03/02/2023BETANIO, R. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731006

21.62DOOR CHIME CODE ENF-AMA…03/02/2023CASAREZ, T. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

71.00CORK BOARD BULLETIN BOARD…03/02/2023CASAREZ, T. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

71.00WATER BOTTLE RACKS-AMAZ…03/02/2023CASAREZ, T. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015 453.25RECORDS TRNG/CORONA/CA…03/02/2023CORONA, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 200.00HPD POSTAGE-USPS03/02/2023CRANDALL, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710005

24.99USPS MONTHLY SERVICE FEE-S…03/02/2023CRANDALL, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015 504.00POSTAGE FOR RECORDS DEPT…03/02/2023FILICE, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710005 104.07HARBOR FREIGHT - SOLAR PA…03/02/2023HANSON, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722010

9.82HOLLISTER ACE - KWIKSEAL C…03/02/2023HENDERSON, A 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710040 161.98HPD/OES BUSINESS SELECT PL…03/02/2023HOEFLING, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-740058 221.02BATTERY OPERATED PUCK FLA…03/02/2023LELAND, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015 218.39UNIFORM PATCHES FOR DRO…03/02/2023LELAND, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015 190.02MEASURING WHEELS-AMAZON03/02/2023LELAND, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015 452.04CATCH POLES FOR PATROL-A…03/02/2023LELAND, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

53.09FUEL FOR FUNERAL IN SELMA-…03/02/2023LELAND, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 393.30ADDITIONAL KEYS FOR HPD-B…03/02/2023LELAND, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710040 567.84HANDCUFFS-GALLS03/02/2023LELAND, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731000 239.98LOAD HEIGHT MEASURING STI…03/02/2023MARTINEZ, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

68.57FUEL FOR TRAINING-CHEVRON03/02/2023MCKINNEY, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 -4.00CREDIT FOR FRAUDULANT CH…03/02/2023MORGAN, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

76.88FUEL FOR TRAINING-CHEVRON03/02/2023MORGAN, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

63.63FUEL FOR TRAINING-CHEVRON03/02/2023MORGAN, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 237.62LODGING FOR TRAINING-BEST…03/02/2023MORGAN, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 2,360.95SP REF FITNESS CO - FS4 - FITN…03/02/2023RAMON, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 3,397.245.11 TACTICAL - SAFETY PARK…03/02/2023RAMON, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-750050 184.47NYLON HOBBLE RESTRAINTS-…03/02/2023RAYAS, R. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015 109.23USB FOR PROPERTY AND EVID…03/02/2023REYNA, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

60.00MONTEREY CO - TRAINING M…03/02/2023ROSSI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710055

92.04DUNNEVILLE MARKET - LUNCH…03/02/2023ROSSI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722005

60.76NOB HILL - LUNCH - VIRTUAL F…03/02/2023ROSSI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722005 A.2.b
Packet Pg. 50

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 2 of 10
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 200.32DUNNEVILLE MARKET - LUNCH…03/02/2023ROSSI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722005 170.884TH ST EATERY - LUNCH - FF VI…03/02/2023ROSSI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722005

74.21HOME DEPOT - SAW HORSES…03/02/2023ROSSI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722010 183.15ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR_PA…03/02/2023SCHARTON, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-722010

59.89SHAWS BEACON_GAS FOR RE…03/02/2023SCHARTON, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-722010 1,079.00HYATT REGENCY_ACCOMODAT…03/02/2023SCHARTON, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-722010

50.00MSO MARCUS CAPE MBRSHP-…03/02/2023SOARES, K. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710055 300.00REG. FEE FOR CAPE CONF-CALI…03/02/2023SOARES, K. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010

60.00CMC training03/02/2023Uranda, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1110-722010 149.90Zoom annual account03/02/2023Uranda, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1120-710015 923.16GYM EQUIPMENT REPLACEM…03/02/2023WEISS, M. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

42.77PEEP HOLES FOR CODE ENF D…03/02/2023WEISS, M. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

50.00FUEL FOR TRAINING-QUIK STOP03/02/2023WEISS, M. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

49.69FUEL FOR TRAINING-CHEVRON03/02/2023WEISS, M. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 510.85LODGING FOR TRAINING-COM…03/02/2023WEISS, M. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 702.95LODGING FOR TRAINING-COM…03/02/2023WEISS, M. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010

5.50Starbucks charge03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1100-710015

5.25Starbucks charge03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1100-710015

14.95Starbucks charge03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1100-710015

17.00Mints03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1105-710015

20.75Mints03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1105-710015

20.00Coffee for Mayor's Meeting wi…03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1105-722005

15.00Breakfast for Mayor's Meeting…03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1105-722005 397.97Flight to Master Municipal Cle…03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1110-722005 317.96Flight to City Clerks Annual Co…03/02/2023Woodworth, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1110-722005

41.50COUPLER LOCK - AUTOZONE03/23/2023JACINTO, J 09/22U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015 289.45City Manager lunch03/23/2023Miller, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1120-722010 1,119.69Disneyland Resort lodging03/23/2023Miller, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1120-722010 328.47CSMFO conference hotel room03/23/2023Miller, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-722010 926.70PARMA conference hotel room03/23/2023Miller, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4100-722010 170.15Holiday Inn express03/23/2023Miller, B. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4100-722010

39.66GASB87 WEBINAR_02-01-202203/23/2023RODRIGUEZ,C. 02/22U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-722005 1,725.00Conference registration for Do…03/03/2023Mirrione, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1105-722008 100.00Registration for David Mirirone…03/03/2023Mirrione, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1120-722005 577.86Airport Director advertising03/03/2023Mirrione, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710025 -20.00Linked in Refund charge03/03/2023Mirrione, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710025

29.99LinkedIn monthly subscription03/03/2023Mirrione, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710025 -987.50Linked in Refund charge03/03/2023Mirrione, D. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710025 190.45CLEANING PRODUCTS-ZEP PR…03/09/2023BAUTISTA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710015

40.00MARIPOSA TAX - LIVE SCAN03/09/2023BETTENCOURT, G 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722010 143.33WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY - WIL…03/09/2023BIRD, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 143.33WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY - WIL…03/09/2023BIRD, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 143.33WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY - WIL…03/09/2023BIRD, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 143.32WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY - WIL…03/09/2023BIRD, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015

79.94ACE HARDWARE - FS2-MATERI…03/09/2023BUZZETTA, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 750.00HEALTH EDUCATIONAL SERVIC…03/09/2023BUZZETTA, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710016 108.38TARGET - MATERIALS, SUPPLIE…03/09/2023BUZZETTA, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722010

56.04NOB HILL - FOOD - INTERVIEWS03/09/2023BUZZETTA, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722010

41.38ROUND TABLE - FOOD - INTER…03/09/2023BUZZETTA, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-722010

25.92UPS STORE - SHIPPING CHARG…03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710005

34.93AMAZON - MILWAUKEE BATT…03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710015

20.00SUDS - 5005-22356 CAR WASH03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710015 2,019.39EBAY -OIL HOSE REEL03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710015 142.58EBAY -7000-20102 STEERING …03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710076

58.91O'REILY - 2500-101 SPARK PLU…03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710077 179.06PARTS GEEK - DEPT 2500 - 2 T…03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710077 325.84SPEEDTECH - 5005-22254 LED …03/09/2023CASTILLO, E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-750070

9.26NUTS/BOLTS - TRUE VALUE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710040

27.42REPAIR MATERIALS- ACE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710040

41.50SUPPLIES- ACE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015 A.2.b
Packet Pg. 51

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 3 of 10
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number

15.94NUTS/BOLTS - TRUE VALUE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710040

60.05SUPPLIES- TRUE VALUE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-710015

9.99Apple iCloud - Daisy03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1120-710015

25.00TylerConnect Air - EarlyBird03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-722010

25.00TylerConnect Air - EarlyBird03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-722010 551.46TylerConnect Flight - Southwest03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-722010 1,099.00TylerConnect Conference Regi…03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-722010 207.56APC UPSes - Amazon03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004

55.21Network Switch - Amazon03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 183.27Dell Docks - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004

61.14Cables - Amazon03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004

26.20Cables - Amazon03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 338.66Mic System Council - Amazon03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 -338.66Mic System Council Refund - …03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 112.24Dell XT3 Batteries - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 196.62Dell XT3 Batteries - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 121.25Keyboard Combos - Staples03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 121.25Keyboard Combos - Staples03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004 109.24Dell Docking Stations - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004

46.42Cabling - Amazon03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731004

79.27Dell Dock Engr - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731005 1,024.19Dell Laptop City Engr - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731005 5,573.50Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731005 5,713.29Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731005 142.01USB Drive- Amazon03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-731008 154.80Web Calendars Subscription - …03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-740027 1,033.66Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-740027 783.80Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1157-740027 105.85Animal Control Domain Renew…03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710015 335.90Dell XT3 Laptop - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731005

88.98Dell XT3 Laptop - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731005 266.20Dell XT3 Laptop - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731005

65.97Dell XT3 Laptop - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731005

86.65Dell XT3 Laptop - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731005

74.96Dropbox for PD - Dropbox03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-731006 400.00BlueBeam for Engr - Bluebeam03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4000-740027

3.21ACE HOLLISTER HARDWARE RA…03/09/2023DE LA TORRE, J. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4000-710015

15.37AMAZON - STAPLER03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710001

3.37AMAZON - PENS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710001

3.37AMAZON - PENS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710001

59.99UTILITY PRO - SAFETY JACKET03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-731000

3.37AMAZON - PENS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-710001 159.98UTILITY PRO - SAFETY JACKETS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-731000

6.45TRANSCRIPTS-PARCHMENT - …03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

10.00TRANSCRIPTS-PARCHMENT - …03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

33.47FUEL FOR TRAINING-ARCO03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

38.76FUEL FOR TRAINING-ARCO03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

40.35FUEL FOR TRAINING-CROWN …03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

41.99FUEL FOR TRAINING-LOVE'S03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 711.98LODGING FOR TRAINING-HOLI…03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 846.90LODGING FOR TRAINING-HOLI…03/09/2023ESQUEDA, S. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010

85.18TRUE VALUE - 5010-50202 AIR…03/09/2023FLORES, R 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710079 207.97SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-731000

83.98SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-731000 107.98SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-731000 239.96SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-731000 579.02AMAZON/PRINTER03/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710001 475.78AMAZON/TONER MULTI PACK03/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710001

6.48AMAZON/LYSOL-203/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015

8.00SPOTIFY/MTHLY SUBSCRIPTION03/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710055 A.2.b
Packet Pg. 52

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 4 of 10
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 125.00NRPA/DIRECTORS SCHOO 202303/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-722005 579.02AMAZON/PRINTER03/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-710001 475.77AMAZON/TONER MULTI PACK03/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-710001

6.47AMAZON/LYSOL-203/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-710015

60.69GAB-PET WASTE ELIMINATOR03/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-710015

7.99SPOTIFY/MTHLY SUBSCRIPTION03/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-710055 125.00NRPA/DIRECTORS SCHOO 202303/09/2023GARZA, T. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-722005 319.00AMERICAN PLANNING - CHRIST…03/09/2023GONZALEZ, M.T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4010-722010

49.14ACE HDWR/CABLE TIE & CAN L…03/09/2023GRACIA, R. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-710015 112.50CAL FEST/PRE CONFERENCE …03/09/2023GRACIA, R. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8000-722005 112.50CAL FEST/PRE CONFERENCE …03/09/2023GRACIA, R. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-8050-722005

54.32TARGET - CLEANING SUPPLIES03/09/2023GRANUCCI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 396.47ACE HARDWARE - BLUE DEF, …03/09/2023GRANUCCI, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710040 237.55ROGUE - BARBELL - FS403/09/2023GREWOHL, V 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 457.78REP FITNESS - FS4 - DUMBELL …03/09/2023GREWOHL, V 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 517.75REF FITNESS - FS4 WIGHT BEN…03/09/2023HOLGUIN, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 873.86THE FIRE STORE - PPE HOOD/…03/09/2023HOLGUIN, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 645.89THE FIRE STORE - HELMET/SHI…03/09/2023HOLGUIN, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015 648.55FIRE ETC - FS2-CASTRO - STRU…03/09/2023HOLGUIN, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015

16.39UPS STORE 10X10 BOX QTY 10…03/09/2023KELLY, E. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-4010-710005

22.94OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

58.22OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001 -9.10OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

7.17OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_C…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

10.11OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_C…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

3.24OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

22.34OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

10.56OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

9.43OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

34.89OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1155-710001

18.02FUEL FOR TRAINING-7-ELEVEN03/09/2023MELGOZA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035

80.75FUEL FOR TRAINING-CHEVRON03/09/2023MELGOZA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 322.62LODGING FOR TRAINING-THE…03/09/2023MELGOZA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010

69.00REGISTRATION FEE-ALLAN HA…03/09/2023MELGOZA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 404.10LODGING FOR TRAINING-EMB…03/09/2023MELGOZA, A. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010

4.00FRAUDULANT CHARGE-UBER …03/09/2023MORGAN, B. 11/22U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015 475.30CAGE CARD HOLDER-ANIMAL …03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710001

86.02SHEET PROTECTORS/BATTERIE…03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710015

11.34DRY ERASE MARKERS-TARGET03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710015 108.40KENNEL CLEANER-PROVET LOG…03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710015

50.47CASH REGISTER ROLLS. FOLDE…03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710015 387.00KENNEL CLEANER-PROVET LOG…03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710015

53.72PILL POCKETS-TARGET03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710017

50.65RABBIT FOOD & BEDDING-TA…03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710017 407.30DOG FOOD/RABBIT FOOD-MC…03/09/2023OCHOA, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2025-710017 1,050.00REGISTRATION FEE-MOTOROL…03/09/2023OLSON, E. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 797.51ERGONOMIC MSO DESK-WAY…03/09/2023REYNOSO, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710001

0.99HEVC VIDEO EXTENSIONS-MIC…03/09/2023REYNOSO, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710015

62.26HPD BUSINESS CARDS-VISTAPR…03/09/2023REYNOSO, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710030

83.06FUEL FOR EXECUTIVE TRAININ…03/09/2023REYNOSO, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-710035 625.00REG. FEE ANNUAL TRAINING J…03/09/2023REYNOSO, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010 470.11LODGING FOR EXECUTIVE TRA…03/09/2023REYNOSO, C. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2500-722010

87.54HOLLISTER ACE - FS3 CONSUM…03/09/2023SCHNEIDER, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-2205-710015

8.74DUPLICATE KEY- HOLLISTER SA…03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015 1,200.495010-50202 TIRE- BRUCE TIRE …03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5005-710079 187.44STANDING DESK- STANDING D…03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710001 -240.34SUPPLIES- ACE03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015 2,604.494X8 TELEHANDLER PLATFORM-…03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015 680.73SUPPLIES- ACE03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015 261.11WHEELBARROW- TRUE VALUE03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015 A.2.b
Packet Pg. 53

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 5 of 10
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number

61.45GLOVES- AMAZON03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015 239.99SUPPLIES - TRUE VALUE03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015

19.27GLOVES- AMAZON03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015

40.41SUPPLIES- ACE03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710015 1,112.41GRANITE PATCH FOR POTHOL…03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-5010-710040 187.44STANDING DESK- STANDING D…03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-710001

19.26GLOVES- AMAZON03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-710015

61.46GLOVES- AMAZON03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-710015 131.09 SUPPLIES- AMAZON03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-710015 196.64VACUM- TARGET03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-7000-710015

71.19OFFICESUPPLY- SUPPLIES- LAB…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015

74.88OFFICESUPPLY- SUPPLIES- FOL…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015 181.23OFFICESUPPLY- SUPPLIES- HOL…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015

72.53PITNEY BOWES- POSTAGE MA…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015

69.89AMAZON- DESK FILE ORGANIZ…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015

14.99ZOOM.US- VIDEO COMMUNIC…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015 178.47OFFICESUPPLY- SUPPLIES- HA…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015

44.28OFFICESUPPLY- SUPPLIES- SHA…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015 145.07PITNEY BOWES- POSTAGE MA…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-710015

30.00ACE PARKING SAC- PARMA 20…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-722010

30.00ACE PARKING SAC- PARMA 20…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-722010

12.00ACE PARKING SAC- PARMA 20…03/09/2023VEGA, S. 2/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…101-1160-722010 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:70,296.91
Fund: 203 - Gas Tax

18.56TOOL- ACE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…203-5010-710015

3.27KEYS- TRUE VALUE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…203-5010-710015

52.41SUPPLIES- TRUE VALUE03/09/2023CHAVIRA, F 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…203-5010-710015 2,944.0020- 2 3/8 POLE - JV ORTA03/09/2023SPEIGHTS, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…203-5010-740095 Fund 203 - Gas Tax Total:3,018.24
Fund: 213 - HOLLISTER AIRSHOW

21.99Hollister Airshow Domain Ren…03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…213-4200-710015 Fund 213 - HOLLISTER AIRSHOW Total:21.99
Fund: 229 - 4TH OF JULY RALLY
100.85Hollister Rally Domain Renewal…03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…229-2500-710015 Fund 229 - 4TH OF JULY RALLY Total:100.85
Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND

40.00CHEMICAL APPLICATIORS CLA…03/03/2023BOCANEGRA,A 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-4200-710055 408.68NOTARY RENEWAL CLASS- NAT…03/03/2023CORRAL,E 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-4200-710055 1,727.28Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-1157-731005 309.64Dell Laptop City Engr - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-1157-731005 1,685.02Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-1157-731005

23.96Dell Dock Engr - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-1157-731005 312.50Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-1157-740027 236.97Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-1157-740027

46.80Web Calendars Subscription - …03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…601-1157-740027 Fund 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:4,790.85
Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND

21.84KNEE PADS- ACE03/13/2023TORRES, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710015

34.04SUPPLIES- ACE03/13/2023TORRES, J 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710015

39.66GASB87 WEBINAR_02-01-202203/23/2023RODRIGUEZ,C. 02/22U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-722005

13.76OFFICE SUPPLIES- AMAZON03/09/2023BURBANK, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710001

98.14TOOLS- GRAINGER03/09/2023BURBANK, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710015 311.00AWWA MEMBERSHIP- AWWA03/09/2023BURBANK, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710055 524.00Dell Laptop City Engr - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1157-731005 2,923.08Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1157-731005 2,851.57Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1157-731005

40.55Dell Dock Engr - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1157-731005 528.84Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1157-740027

79.20Web Calendars Subscription - …03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1157-740027 A.2.b
Packet Pg. 54

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 6 of 10
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 401.02Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1157-740027

3.37AMAZON - PENS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710001

23.39AMAZON - OTTERBOX03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710015

39.99UTILITY PRO - SAFETY SWEATS…03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-731000 125.98UTILITY PRO - SAFETY JACKETS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-731000 107.99UTILITY PRO - SAFETY JACKETS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-731000 204.36 TOOLS- AMAZON03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710015 151.85BATTERY FOR TOOLS- AMAZON03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710040 269.95SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-731000 287.96SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-731000 780.00UTILITY CONFERENCE- AWWA03/09/2023GONZALES, H 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-722005

7.50ZOOM MEETINGS- ZOOM03/09/2023GRZAN, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-710045

22.94OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

10.11OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_C…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001 -9.10OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

3.24OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

58.22OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

34.89OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

10.56OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

9.43OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

7.17OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_C…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001

22.34OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-1155-710001 289.50WORK BOOTS - BOOT BARN03/09/2023PEREZ, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…620-5035-731000 Fund 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:10,328.34
Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND

39.68GASB87 WEBINAR_02-01-202203/23/2023RODRIGUEZ,C. 02/22U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-722005

13.75OFFICE SUPPLIES- AMAZON03/09/2023BURBANK, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710001

98.15TOOLS- GRAINGER03/09/2023BURBANK, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710015

13.23SUNNYSLOPE/CERRA VISTA M…03/09/2023CASAREZ, B 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710040 2,851.57Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1157-731005 524.00Dell Laptop City Engr - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1157-731005 2,923.08Dell PowerEdge Server - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1157-731005

40.56Dell Dock Engr - Ebay03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1157-731005 528.84Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1157-740027

79.20Web Calendars Subscription - …03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1157-740027 401.02Server Maint Renewal - Dell03/09/2023DaSilva, P. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1157-740027

3.38AMAZON - PENS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710001 159.97UTILITY PRO - SAFETY JACKETS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-731000

79.99UTILITY PRO - SAFETY SWEATS…03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-731000 129.50WORK BOOTS03/09/2023FILICE, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-731000 129.50WORK BOOTS03/09/2023FILICE, D 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-731000

23.47TRUE VALUE - 4995 - 20213/2…03/09/2023FLORES, R 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-5005-710082 310.00FOG TRAINING- CALIFORNIA …03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-722010 539.91SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-731000

79.99SAFETY JACKET- UTILITY PRO03/09/2023GARCIA, S 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-7000-731000 310.00FOG TRAINING- CALIFORNIA …03/09/2023GONZALES, H 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-722010

7.49ZOOM MEETINGS- ZOOM03/09/2023GRZAN, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710045

13.10FREMONT ALLEY- AUTO ZONE03/09/2023HERNANDEZ, A 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710040

10.56OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

22.34OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

9.44OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

34.90OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

7.16OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_C…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

22.94OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001 -9.10OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

3.23OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

10.11OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_C…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001

58.25OFFICE SUPPLIES _AMAZON_F…03/09/2023KEY, V. 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-1155-710001 275.20TRAFFIC CONTROL- AMAZON03/09/2023SALINAS, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710015 A.2.b
Packet Pg. 55

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 7 of 10
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 400.58TOOLS- ACE03/09/2023SALINAS, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…660-4995-710015 Fund 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:10,144.99
Fund: 662 - STORM DRAIN
217.41STORM TRAINING- ENDEAVOR…03/09/2023BURBANK, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…662-5015-722010 Fund 662 - STORM DRAIN Total:217.41
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND

40.25MATERIALS- MCKINNON03/09/2023BURBANK, T 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…670-5015-710040

23.39AMAZON - OTTERBOX03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…670-5015-710015 125.98UTILITY PRO - SAFETY JACKETS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…670-5015-731000

53.98UTILITY PRO - SAFETY JACKETS03/09/2023DELGADO, M 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…670-5015-731000

17.38TOOL - HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS03/09/2023ECHEVARRIA, A 02/23U.S. BANK CORP. PAYMENT SY…670-5015-710015 Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:260.98
Grand Total:99,180.56
A.2.b
Packet Pg. 56

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 8 of 10
Fund Summary
Fund Expense Amount
101 - General Fund 70,296.91
203 - Gas Tax 3,018.24
213 - HOLLISTER AIRSHOW 21.99
229 - 4TH OF JULY RALLY 100.85
601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND 4,790.85
620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND 10,328.34
660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND 10,144.99
662 - STORM DRAIN 217.41
670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND 260.98
Grand Total:99,180.56
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
101-1100-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 25.70
101-1105-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 37.75
101-1105-722005 Conferences/Meetings - …35.00
101-1105-722008 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS…1,725.00
101-1110-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 715.93
101-1110-722010 TRAINING 60.00
101-1120-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 159.89
101-1120-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 100.00
101-1120-722010 TRAINING 1,409.14
101-1155-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 169.80
101-1155-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 9.26
101-1155-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 39.66
101-1155-722010 TRAINING 1,650.51
101-1157-722010 TRAINING 1,700.46
101-1157-731004 CITY NW & COMPUTER R…1,240.40
101-1157-731005 CITY NW & COMPUTER R…12,390.25
101-1157-731008 CITY NETWORK SUPPLIES 142.01
101-1157-740027 CONTRACT: COMPUTER P…1,972.26
101-1160-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 861.27
101-1160-710025 ADVERTISING -399.65
101-1160-722010 TRAINING 72.00
101-2025-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 475.30
101-2025-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 939.53
101-2025-710017 ANIMAL FEED 511.67
101-2205-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6,702.28
101-2205-710016 LAB & MEDICAL 750.00
101-2205-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 406.29
101-2205-710050 BOOKS/PUBLICATIONS 87.56
101-2205-710055 MEMBERSHIPS/DUES 60.00
101-2205-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 524.00
101-2205-722010 TRAINING 424.08
101-2205-730000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40.00
101-2205-740027 CONTRACT: COMPUTER P…14.99
101-2205-750050 IMPROVEMENTS 3,397.24
101-2500-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 797.51
101-2500-710005 POSTAGE 704.00
101-2500-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,803.58
101-2500-710030 PRINTING/BINDING 62.26
101-2500-710035 FUEL/OIL 774.70
101-2500-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 420.72
101-2500-710055 MEMBERSHIPS/DUES 50.00
101-2500-722010 TRAINING 7,634.33
101-2500-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 567.84
101-2500-731005 CITY NW & COMPUTER R…843.70
101-2500-731006 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 149.96
101-2500-740058 Contracts: Cable 161.98
A.2.b
Packet Pg. 57

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 9 of 10
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
101-4000-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3.21
101-4000-740027 CONTRACT: COMPUTER P…400.00
101-4010-710005 POSTAGE 16.39
101-4010-722010 TRAINING 371.00
101-4100-722010 TRAINING 1,096.85
101-5005-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.74
101-5005-710005 POSTAGE 25.92
101-5005-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,074.32
101-5005-710076 PARKS VEHICLE MAINT 142.58
101-5005-710077 POLICE VEHICLE MAINT 237.97
101-5005-710079 STREETS VEHICLE MAINT 1,285.67
101-5005-750070 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 325.84
101-5010-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 190.81
101-5010-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,708.61
101-5010-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 1,128.35
101-5010-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 351.94
101-7000-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 190.81
101-7000-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 468.50
101-7000-731000 Uniform Purchases 507.92
101-8000-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,054.80
101-8000-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 935.58
101-8000-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 364.00
101-8000-710055 MEMBERSHIPS/DUES 8.00
101-8000-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 237.50
101-8050-710001 Office Supplies 1,054.79
101-8050-710015 Operating Supplies 67.16
101-8050-710045 Rentals/Leases 364.00
101-8050-710055 Memberships/Dues 7.99
101-8050-722005 Conferences/Meetings 237.50
203-5010-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 74.24
203-5010-740095 CONTRACTS: POLE REPLA…2,944.00
213-4200-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21.99
229-2500-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 100.85
601-1157-731005 CITY NW & COMPUTER R…3,745.90
601-1157-740027 CONTRACTS: COMPUTER …596.27
601-4200-710055 MEMBERSHIPS/DUES 448.68
620-1155-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 169.80
620-1155-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 39.66
620-1157-731005 CITY NW & COMPUTER R…6,339.20
620-1157-740027 CONTRACTS: COMPUTER …1,009.06
620-5035-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.13
620-5035-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 381.77
620-5035-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 151.85
620-5035-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 7.50
620-5035-710055 MEMBERSHIPS/DUES 311.00
620-5035-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 780.00
620-5035-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 1,121.37
660-1155-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 169.83
660-1155-722005 CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 39.68
660-1157-731005 CITY NW & COMPUTER R…6,339.21
660-1157-740027 CONTRACTS: COMPUTER …1,009.06
660-4995-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.13
660-4995-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 773.93
660-4995-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 26.33
660-4995-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 7.49
660-4995-722010 TRAINING 620.00
660-4995-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 1,038.87
660-5005-710082 SEWER VEHICLE MAINT 23.47
A.2.b
Packet Pg. 58

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16059 - AP 3-23-23 CALCARDS 3/24/2023 11:48:21 AM Page 10 of 10
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
660-7000-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 79.99
662-5015-722010 TRAINING 217.41
670-5015-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 40.77
670-5015-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 40.25
670-5015-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 179.96
Grand Total:99,180.56
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Expense Amount
**None**85,845.02
E2014-710015 431.77
E2015-710015 18.46
E2032-710015 437.37
E2034-710015 41.50
FS400001-710015 2,345.67
FS400001-710016 750.00
FS400001-710050 87.56
FS400001-710055 431.20
FS400001-722005 152.80
FS400001-722010 384.08
FS400001-730000 80.00
FS400001-740027 14.99
FS400001-750050 3,397.24
FS400002-710015 926.14
FS400002-710040 396.47
FS400003-710015 230.87
FS400004-710015 3,199.60
FS400004-710040 9.82
Grand Total:99,180.56
A.2.b
Packet Pg. 59

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:AGENDA ITEM: Consent
STUDY SESSION DATE: N/A
.TITLE OF ITEM: Warrant Register -- General-Special-Enterprise-Assessment Funds .BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register
.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the report and register(s) attached.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

FUND REGISTER TOTAL:$3,435,794.08
General Fund:$0.00
Special Fund:$0.00
Capital Projects Fund:$3,435,794.08
Enterprise Fund:$0.00
Assessment Fund:$0.00
Fund 850/851 $0.00
Amount Transferred to Payroll:$0.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DISBURSED:$3,435,794.08
DEPARTMENT:Administrative Services Department
CONTACT PERSON:

Valera Key, Accounting Technician II
PHONE NUMBER:(831) 636-4301 ext. 22
March 24, 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Sufficient resources are available in each of the funds listed above to satisfy the amount of the warrant and payroll disbursements on this register.

Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION_________________________________________________ Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst
A.2.c
Packet Pg. 60

3/24/2023 11:59:37 AM Page 1 of 2
Expense Approval Register
City of Hollister Packet: APPKT16061 - AP 3-24-23 (SPECIAL) AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number Fund: 304 - AB1600 CIP Traffic Impact
3,435,794.08TIMF-156 CONSTRUCTION_0/…03/23/20232023-01COUNCIL OF SAN BENITO COU…304-4000-730000 Fund 304 - AB1600 CIP Traffic Impact Total:3,435,794.08 Grand Total:3,435,794.08
A.2.c
Packet Pg. 61

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16061 - AP 3-24-23 (SPECIAL) 3/24/2023 11:59:37 AM Page 2 of 2
Fund Summary
Fund Expense Amount
304 - AB1600 CIP Traffic Impact 3,435,794.08
Grand Total:3,435,794.08
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
304-4000-730000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,435,794.08
Grand Total:3,435,794.08
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Expense Amount
**None**3,435,794.08
Grand Total:3,435,794.08
A.2.c
Packet Pg. 62

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:AGENDA ITEM: Consent
STUDY SESSION DATE: N/A
.TITLE OF ITEM: Warrant Register -- General-Special-Enterprise-Assessment Funds .BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register
.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the report and register(s) attached.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

FUND REGISTER TOTAL:$380,662.14
General Fund:$306,268.12
Special Fund:$2,404.50
Capital Projects Fund:$0.00
Enterprise Fund:$53,556.01
Assessment Fund:$18,433.51
Fund 850/851 $0.00
Amount Transferred to Payroll:$0.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DISBURSED:$380,662.14
DEPARTMENT:Administrative Services Department
CONTACT PERSON:

Valera Key, Accounting Technician II
PHONE NUMBER:(831) 636-4301 ext. 22
March 28, 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Sufficient resources are available in each of the funds listed above to satisfy the amount of the warrant and payroll disbursements on this register.

Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION_________________________________________________ Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst
A.2.d
Packet Pg. 63

3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 1 of 12
Expense Approval Register
City of Hollister Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number Fund: 101 - General Fund
895.00MAR 20023 HVAC MAINTENA…03/17/20234571530EXTREME AIR 101-8000-740092 129.50PER DIEM/1 FULL DAY/1 TRAV…03/21/2023WELLS, C. 03/20/23WELLS, CHRISTOPHER 101-2500-722010 250.00#123158 REFUND DPCH 3/18/…03/23/2023#123158ALNAS, CARLEY 101-270012 308.03DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE03/23/2023000019656200AT&T 101-2500-725010 404.32SANTA CRUZ CONSOLIDATED …03/23/2023000019657458AT&T 101-2500-725010

27.112205-ALARM - 02/17/2023 - 0…03/23/2023000019666578AT&T 101-2205-725010

27.112205-ALARM - 02/17/2023 - 0…03/23/2023000019666580AT&T 101-2205-725010 108.00HPD WATER DELIVERY03/23/2023000245541DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-2500-710015

11.242-5 GAL DRINKING WATER @ …03/23/2023000245566DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-8000-710015

11.242-5 GAL DRINKING WATER @ …03/23/2023000245566DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-8050-710015

16.00City Hall water delivery03/23/2023000245574DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-1105-710015

19.00MONTHLY WATER DELIVERY/…03/23/2023000245588DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-2025-710015

4.56PUBLIC WORKS WATER03/23/2023000245589DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-5005-710015

4.56PUBLIC WORKS WATER03/23/2023000245589DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-5010-710015

5.32PUBLIC WORKS WATER03/23/2023000245589DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-7000-710015

17.50WATER DELIVERY CODE ENF03/23/2023000245599DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…101-2500-710015 130.9825-01624-00FS #2 6 COMPOU…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…101-2205-725005 266.3725-01620-00_FS #2 2240 VALL…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…101-2205-725005

32.5425-01622-00_FS #2 LANDSCAP…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…101-2205-725005 130.9825-01626-00_FS #2 1 TO 6 CO…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…101-2205-725005 130.9825-01628-00_FS#2 FIRE SPRNK…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…101-2205-725005

53.2260-03028-00_1041 NEZ PERCE…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…101-8050-725005

78.0215-07570-00_SCH PK CERRA VI…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…101-8050-725005 232.15HPD CARWASH FEBRUARY 202303/23/202302/01/23PENGUINS CASH WASH, INC 101-2500-710015 581.59RAIN JACKETS FOR PATROL03/23/2023023743252GALLS PARENT HOLDINGS LLC 101-2500-731000 1,520.00TRAINING/CLASS REIMBURSE…03/23/2023030323HENDERSON, ANDREW 101-2205-722010 148.002205-PER DIEM - HOME IGNIT…03/23/2023032123BRACKEN, SABRINA 101-2205-722010 148.002205-PER DIEM - HOME IGNIT…03/23/2023032123BEDOLLA, CARLOS 101-2205-722010 279.99REIMBURSEMENT-ITLS UPDAT…03/23/2023032323UTZIG, JARRED 101-2205-722010 145.252205-BUSINESS ACCOUNT - 03…03/23/20230510504030223CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS …101-2205-710020 968.935010-40201 HOSE/GUN/KIT03/23/202311453DAVEMARK INDUSTRIES 101-5005-710079 275.00APR - JUNE 2023 ALARM MON…03/23/2023117269FIRST ALARM 101-8000-740016 135.002205-FS1-ALARM MONITORIN…03/23/2023117271FIRST TRUST ALARM COMPANY…101-2205-740015 140.002205-FS2-ALARM MONITORIN…03/23/2023117272FIRST TRUST ALARM COMPANY…101-2205-740015

25.001157-11922 FLAT REPAIR03/23/20231-241314SAN BENITO TIRE INC.101-5005-710071 319.842205-LAB&MEDICAL - PET RES…03/23/20231299739LIFE-ASSIST, INC 101-2205-750050 1,447.682205-LAB&MEDICAL - EPINEP…03/23/20231300835LIFE-ASSIST, INC 101-2205-710016

26.00TRASH GATOR/HAND SANITIZ…03/23/20231-3286CENTRAL AG SUPPLY LLC 101-5005-710015 144.49TRASH GATOR/HAND SANITIZ…03/23/20231-3286CENTRAL AG SUPPLY LLC 101-5010-710015 144.50TRASH GATOR/HAND SANITIZ…03/23/20231-3286CENTRAL AG SUPPLY LLC 101-7000-710015 119.20KEY BLANKS/KEY COPIES/STA…03/23/20231655BAYTECH ACCESS & SECURITY …101-2500-710040

60.002205-FS4 - PEST CONTROL - M…03/23/202318758EDWARD LEWIS BRADY 101-2205-740187

50.002205-FS3 - PEST CONTROL - M…03/23/202318788EDWARD LEWIS BRADY 101-2205-740187

65.002205-FS1-PEST CONTROL - MA…03/23/202318816EDWARD LEWIS BRADY 101-2205-740187

65.002205-FS2-PEST CONTROL - MA…03/23/202318817EDWARD LEWIS BRADY 101-2205-740187

47.45AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1100-725010

87.98AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1100-725010

16.00AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1110-725010

16.00AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1120-725010

77.31AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1125-725010

25.80AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1155-725010

15.08AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1157-725010

31.84AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-1160-725010 A.2.d
Packet Pg. 64

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 2 of 12
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number

60.85AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-2025-725010

30.16AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-2205-725010

45.24AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-2205-725010 239.76AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-2500-725010 108.97AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-4000-725010

46.47AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-4010-725010

20.81AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-5005-725010

20.81AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-5010-725010 180.29AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-7000-725010 136.09AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-7020-725010 166.30AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 101-8000-725010

57.679391023404_02/17/23 TO 03/…03/23/202319666577AT&T 101-1100-725010 9,660.30FY 22/23 TREE MAINTENANCE …03/23/2023197406WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.101-5010-730000 220.00MONTHLY LANDSCAPING/AN…03/23/20232010-17114SILVA LANDSCAPE INC.101-2025-710015 300.002023 PHOTOS WITH EASTER B…03/23/20232023 PHOTO W/EASTER PETTY…GARZA, TINA 101-101114 607.50339 5TH ST BUILDING REPAIR03/23/20232023-0237MARANATHA ENTERPRISES INC.101-4000-710040 185.74MONITORING FEE FIRE/SPRIN…03/23/202320414804BALCO HOLDINGS INC.101-2500-740016 16,248.50Month of Feb. 2023 General L…03/23/20232184366LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 14,170.28Month of Feb. 2023 Planning &…03/23/20232184367LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 3,600.00Month of Feb. 2023 Personnel03/23/20232184368LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 11,294.45Month of Feb. 2023 PRA03/23/20232184369LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 3,275.00Month of Feb. 2023 Police De…03/23/20232184370LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 9,876.88Month of Feb. 2023 Council M…03/23/20232184371LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 6,953.25Month of Feb. 2023 Public Wo…03/23/20232184372LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 2,375.00Month of Feb. 2023 Finance03/23/20232184373LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 1,225.00Month of Feb. 2023 Airport03/23/20232184374LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 3,150.00Month of Feb. 2023 Code Enfo…03/23/20232184375LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 1,382.35Month of Feb. 2023 Cain v. C…03/23/20232184376LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 625.00Month of Feb. 2023 Parks & R…03/23/20232184377LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 5,457.75Month of Feb. 2023 LLXP, Inc. …03/23/20232184378LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 4,675.00Month of Feb. 2023 General F…03/23/20232184379LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 1,025.00Month of Feb. 2023 General Lit…03/23/20232184380LOZANO SMITH LLP 101-1105-740087 4,486.50150th time capsule reimburse…03/23/202323-025VILLA & SONS ENTERPRISES, I…101-1100-710015

50.00LETHAL INSTRUCTOR UPDATE …03/23/202323-094NATIONAL TRAINING CONCEP…101-2500-722010 1,609.902500-92025 PM SERVICE03/23/2023273445SAN JOSE BMW MOTORSPORTS 101-5005-710077

14.80REPAIR PARTS03/23/2023273932WRIGHT BROTHERS WELDING…101-5010-710040 369.00City Engineer #2 Search Proces…03/23/20232ECECITY MANAGEMENT ADVISORS…101-1120-730000 149.432500-20323/5005-20029 BATT…03/23/202331023073INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CEN…101-5005-710075 149.442500-20323/5005-20029 BATT…03/23/202331023073INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CEN…101-5005-710077 703.45PANTS/TIE/BELT/SHIRTS/BOO…03/23/2023321044S&L INVESTMENTS 101-2500-731000

52.50PEST AWAY SERVICE 339 5TH …03/23/202332740385CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…101-4000-740279

52.50PEST AWAY SERVICE 339 5TH …03/23/202332740385CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…101-4010-740017

37.00PEST AWAY SERVICE 3/14/23_…03/23/202332900497CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…101-1155-740187

52.50PEST AWAY SERVICE 339 5TH …03/23/202332901574CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…101-4000-740279

52.50PEST AWAY SERVICE 339 5TH …03/23/202332901574CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…101-4010-740017 150.00PEST AWAY SERVICE 375 5TH …03/23/202332901575CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…101-1100-710040 2,325.272205-FS2-02/06/2023 - 03/07/…03/23/20233305629134-8 03/25P G AND E 101-2205-725001

97.401291 SOUTH STREET OFFICE03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 101-5005-725001 592.591321 SOUTH ST/GAS & ELECTR…03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 101-5005-725001

97.401291 SOUTH STREET OFFICE03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 101-5010-725001 592.591321 SOUTH ST/GAS & ELECTR…03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 101-5010-725001

97.401291 SOUTH STREET OFFICE03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 101-7000-725001 592.591321 SOUTH ST/GAS & ELECTR…03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 101-7000-725001 804.58MONTHLY COPIER SVC FEE03/23/202333679600GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL SE…101-2500-710045

13.86LARGE OFFICE ENVELOPES03/23/20233532372658STAPLES, INC.101-2500-710001 154.08OFFICE CHAIR03/23/20233532842996STAPLES, INC.101-2500-710001

52.90CASH BAGS & RECEIPT BOOK03/23/20233532842998STAPLES, INC.101-8000-710001 170.002205-FS1 - REPAIRS TO KITCH…03/23/202336181D & K MARQUEZ ENTERPRISES,…101-2205-710040

17.503/21/23 RECREATION UNIFO…03/23/20234150070049CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 3 101-8000-731000

17.503/21/23 RECREATION UNIFO…03/23/20234150070049CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 3 101-8050-731000 A.2.d
Packet Pg. 65

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 3 of 12
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 851.20TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202341712INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 1,042.56TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202341712INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,064.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202341796INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 863.37TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202341796INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 439.83TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202341873INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 638.40TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202341887INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 781.92TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202341887INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 212.80TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202341966INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 638.40TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202341966INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 1,172.88TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- GA…03/23/202341966INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,303.20TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202341966INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 425.60TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342052INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002

19.95TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342052INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 638.40TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342052INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 1,303.20TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202342052INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,026.27TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- GA…03/23/202342052INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 826.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202342052INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 1,064.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342139INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002

19.95TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342139INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 1,295.06TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202342139INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,172.88TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- GA…03/23/202342139INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 896.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202342139INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 957.60TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342220INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 1,172.88TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- GA…03/23/202342220INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 912.24TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202342220INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 826.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202342220INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 851.20TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342369INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 1,042.56TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- GA…03/23/202342369INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,042.56TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202342369INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,064.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342443INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 1,303.20TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- RO…03/23/202342443INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,229.90TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- GA…03/23/202342443INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,064.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202342673INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 896.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202342673INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 1,106.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- D…03/23/202342753INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 1,036.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202342753INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 1,120.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- D…03/23/202342829INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 896.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- D…03/23/202342909INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002

21.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- D…03/23/202342909INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 672.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202342909INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 1,120.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- D…03/23/202342988INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 672.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202342988INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 1,052.83TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- DI…03/23/202343060INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1120-701002 886.76TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- D…03/23/202343061INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1155-701002 672.00TEMP STAFFING SERVICES- VIL…03/23/202343061INFINITY STAFFING SERVICES I…101-1160-701002 297.502205-PLAN CHECK - FEBRUARY…03/23/202349563CSG CONSULTANTS, INC.,101-2205-730000 154.75500-0616628-000_CONTRACT …03/23/2023496477936U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIA…101-1155-710045 538.06450-9674814-005_COVERAGE …03/23/20235024289681WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-1100-710045 269.03450-9674814-005_COVERAGE …03/23/20235024289681WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-4000-710045 269.02450-9674814-005_COVERAGE …03/23/20235024289681WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-4010-710045 327.54450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-1100-710045 163.77450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-4000-710045 163.77450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-4010-710045

65.51450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-5005-710045

65.51450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-5010-710045

65.50450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-7000-710045 327.54450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…101-8000-710045

16.13MAT SERVICE _3/3/23_FINAN…03/23/20235110183714ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-1155-710001

40.72BUILDINGS/GROUNDS/STREET…03/23/20235110188466ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-5010-731000

49.26BUILDINGS/GROUNDS/STREET…03/23/20235110188466ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-7000-731000 A.2.d
Packet Pg. 66

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 4 of 12
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number

41.35MOPS/SCRAPERS/TOWELS03/23/20235110188475ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-5005-710015

29.02FLEET UNIFORMS03/23/20235110188475ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-5005-731000

2.181291 SOUTH MATS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-5005-710015

2.181291 SOUTH MATS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-5010-710015

2.181291 SOUTH MATS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…101-7000-710015

20.77CONT2751-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1332633KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…101-1110-710015

20.77CONT2751-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1332633KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…101-1120-710015 246.60CONT2751-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1332633KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…101-1125-710015

31.98CONT2751-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1332633KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…101-7000-710015

32.75CONT2751-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1332633KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…101-8000-710015

94.60CONT1943-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1350779KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…101-1155-710001

85.251/18-2/15/23 DPCH @600 WE…03/23/20235855907212-7 03/23P G AND E 101-8000-725001

56.26GRAFFITI PAINT03/23/202361513HOLLISTER PAINT CO., INC.101-7000-710040

41.50OFFICE SUPPLIES_PAPER_FIN…03/23/2023674825-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 101-1155-710001 131.522205-BATTERIES, MARKERS, M…03/23/2023674898-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 101-2205-710001

17.912205-OFFICE SUPPLIES - MARK…03/23/2023675003-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 101-2205-710001

51.77OFFICE SUPPLIES_FINANCE _3…03/23/2023675137-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 101-1155-710001 127.302205-LABELS, STAPLER, TAPE D…03/23/2023675913-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 101-2205-710001

40.752205-OFFICE SUPPLIES - TAPE,…03/23/2023676421-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 101-2205-710001 12,717.37HPD GAS & ELECTRIC03/23/20236961994495-7 03/23P G AND E 101-2500-725001 483.90Public Ordinances03/23/202373202NEW SV MEDIA 101-1110-728000 329.52City Hall Alarm Monitoring 04/…03/23/2023740211FIRST ALARM 101-1100-710040

60.09REPAIR MATERIALS03/23/2023744621MCKINNON LUMBER CO. INC.101-7000-710040

8.58PRUNE ST REPAIR PARTS03/23/2023745099MCKINNON LUMBER CO. INC.101-5010-710040

22.15OVERNIGHT CHARGE_US BAN…03/23/20238-057-17599FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATI…101-1155-710005 257.00MAR 2023 CITY HALL LNDSP03/23/20238310187BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…101-8050-730000 202.50MAR 2023 AIRWAY (POND 1) …03/23/20238310288BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…101-5015-730000 472.50MAR 2023 RUSTIC ST (POND 4)…03/23/20238310289BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…101-5015-730000 602.002205-LAB&MEDICAL - FASTPLI…03/23/202384875430BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016 602.002205-LAB&MEDICAL - FASTPLI…03/23/202384875430BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016 602.002205-LAB&MEDICAL - FASTPLI…03/23/202384875430BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016 602.002205-LAB&MEDICAL - FASTPLI…03/23/202384875430BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016 126.252205-CONSUMABLES - OXYGE…03/23/202384887416BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016 126.262205-CONSUMABLES - OXYGE…03/23/202384887416BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016 126.262205-CONSUMABLES - OXYGE…03/23/202384887416BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016 126.262205-CONSUMABLES - OXYGE…03/23/202384887416BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-2205-710016

10.565005-20128 HEATER HOSE CO…03/23/2023920372HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.101-5005-710075

72.962500-91922 AIR FILTER03/23/2023922605HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.101-5005-710077

6.25 BUG CLEANER/ FUSE03/23/2023923234HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.101-5005-710074

6.25 BUG CLEANER/ FUSE03/23/2023923234HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.101-5005-710076

6.25 BUG CLEANER/ FUSE03/23/2023923234HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.101-5005-710077

6.24 BUG CLEANER/ FUSE03/23/2023923234HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.101-5005-710079

57.472500-79 LUG NUT03/23/2023923428HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.101-5005-710077

28.45MEMORIAL DR. BALL FIELD LI…03/23/20239356215280-6 03/23P G AND E 101-8000-725001 1,638.98COMM CENTER03/23/20239356215280-6 03/23P G AND E 101-8000-725001 1,648.04COMM CENTER03/23/20239356215280-6 03/23P G AND E 101-8050-725001 2,575.7335- SIGNS03/23/202399016ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 101-5010-710061

21.87FLEET CELLPHONE 2/10/23-3/…03/23/20239929675581VERIZON WIRELESS 101-5005-725010 641.55Windows Server 2022 Licensing03/23/2023B16632932SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP.101-1157-731006 745.98Windows Server 2022 Licensing03/23/2023B16632932SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP.101-2500-731006 200.00MEDICARE MONTHLY PAYME…03/23/2023BLAIR, D. APRIL '23BLAIR, DAVID 101-2500-701026 150.902205-CONSUMABLES - SPONG…03/23/2023CAHOS59565FASTENAL COMPANY 101-2205-710015

60.682205-CONSUMABLES - TOWELS03/23/2023CAHOS59617FASTENAL COMPANY 101-2205-710015 200.00MEDICARE MONTHLY PAYME…03/23/2023CELANO, R. APRIL '23Celano, Ray 101-2500-701026 1,065.00COUNTY PARKING REVENUE J…03/23/2023COUNTY 01/2023SAN BENITO COUNTY AUDITOR…101-280002 895.00COUNTY PARKING REVENUE D…03/23/2023COUNTY 12/2022SAN BENITO COUNTY AUDITOR…101-280002 11,473.052205-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 101-2205-740030 11,473.052205-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 101-2205-740030 11,473.052205-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 101-2205-740030 11,473.052205-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 101-2205-740030 A.2.d
Packet Pg. 67

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 5 of 12
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 45,892.312500-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 101-2500-740030 2,261.475010-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 101-5010-740030 321.63FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-5005-710015

68.40FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-5005-710040 321.63FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-5010-710015

68.40FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-5010-710040 321.63FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-7000-710015

68.40FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-7000-710040 285.24STREET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGU…03/23/2023GBP048821NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-5010-710015 285.24STREET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGU…03/23/2023GBP048821NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.101-5010-710040 407.00PER DIEM/4 FULL DAYS/2 TRA…03/23/2023MARCUS, C. 04/02/23MARCUS, CAMMILIA 101-2500-722010 300.00PETTY CASH/CODE ENF REGIST…03/23/2023PETTY CASH 03/2023TERRA CASAREZ 101-101106 200.00MEDICARE MONTHLY PAYME…03/23/2023RODRIGUEZ, R. APRIL '23RODRIGUEZ, RUDOLPH 101-2500-701026 168.93WASH BAY SERVICE03/23/2023S-742245GREEN RUBBER KENNEDY AG, …101-5005-710040 168.93WASH BAY SERVICE03/23/2023S-742245GREEN RUBBER KENNEDY AG, …101-5010-710040 168.93WASH BAY SERVICE03/23/2023S-742245GREEN RUBBER KENNEDY AG, …101-7000-710040 407.00PER DIEM/4 FULL DAYS/2 TRA…03/23/2023SOARES, K. 04/02/23SOARES, KRISTIN LARIE 101-2500-722010 479.60Data Backup Archiving to AWS03/23/2023V2683081EPLUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.101-1157-740014 13,664.706/1/22 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE03/23/2023VS004072VERMONT SYSTEMS INC 101-8000-740027 200.00MEDICARE MONTHLY PAYME…03/23/2023WINN, D. APRIL '23WINN, DAN 101-2500-701026 1,213.571321 SOUTH REPAIR BACKUP …03/23/2023WON20011521QUINN COMPANY 101-5005-710040 1,000.00Log Out Tag Out written proce…03/28/20232127FIRST ON COMPLIANCE 101-4100-730000 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:306,268.12
Fund: 203 - Gas Tax

54.60CHEMICAL USE APRON03/23/20231-3261CENTRAL AG SUPPLY LLC 203-5010-710015 2,259.09PG & E / 375 5th St. & 4th St. …03/23/20235146434149-7 03/23P G AND E 203-5010-725001

90.811 4TH STREET - TRAFFIC CTRL …03/23/20238999009519-5 03/23P G AND E 203-5010-725001 Fund 203 - Gas Tax Total:2,404.50
Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND

27.11AIRPORT CALNET03/23/2023000019666573AT&T 601-4200-725010

27.14AIRPORT CALNET03/23/2023000019666575AT&T 601-4200-725010 593.05AIRPORT SHOP SUPPLIES03/23/2023160426221ULINE, INC 601-4200-710015

88.08AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 601-4200-725010

97.00AIRPORT OFFICE PEST CONTR…03/23/202332899211CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…601-4200-710015 111.00AIRPORT RESTURANT PEST CO…03/23/202332899965CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…601-4200-740187 327.54450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…601-4200-710045

47.64AIRPORT UNIFORMS03/23/20235110146913ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…601-4200-710015

47.64AIRPORT UNIFORMS03/23/20235110151104ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…601-4200-710015

47.64AIRPORT UNIFORMS03/23/20235110155226ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…601-4200-710015

47.64AIRPORT UNIFORMS03/23/20235110159325ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…601-4200-710015

47.64AIRPORT UNIFORMS03/23/20235110163409ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…601-4200-710015

47.64AIRPORT UNIFORMS03/23/20235110167451ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…601-4200-710015

26.80CONT2751-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1332633KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…601-4200-710015 193.95Windows Server 2022 Licensing03/23/2023B16632932SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP.601-1157-731006 145.00Data Backup Archiving to AWS03/23/2023V2683081EPLUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.601-1157-740014 Fund 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:1,922.51
Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND

14.24BAN #9391023403 02/17/23-3…03/23/2023000019666576AT&T 620-5035-740194

26.28BAN #9391023408 02/17/23-3…03/23/2023000019666581AT&T 620-5035-725010

13.56BAN #9391037280 2/17/23-3/…03/23/2023000019667481AT&T 620-5035-740194

7.98PUBLIC WORKS WATER03/23/2023000245589DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…620-5035-710015 833.41ERP PRO DOC MANAGEMENT …03/23/2023025-415479TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.620-1155-740027 140.00MONTHLY FEE_WEBSITE-UB O…03/23/2023025-415885TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.620-1155-740027

26.00TRASH GATOR/HAND SANITIZ…03/23/20231-3286CENTRAL AG SUPPLY LLC 620-5035-710015

41.41AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 620-1155-725010

88.50AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 620-5035-725010 624.13UB_LATE FEE INSERTS_11/8/2…03/23/2023227931INFOSEND, INC 620-1155-740403 1,973.75UB BILLING_FEB 202303/23/2023231203INFOSEND, INC 620-1155-740403

69.11GRASS VALLEY SCADA 3/7/23-…03/23/202323725871238197 3/23AT & T 620-5035-725010 A.2.d
Packet Pg. 68

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 6 of 12
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 1,761.66NASSCO COURSE TRAINING03/23/20233242BACK MUNICIPAL CONSULTING…620-5035-722010

37.00PEST AWAY SERVICE 3/14/23_…03/23/202332900497CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…620-1155-740187 234.67801 MEMORIAL DR WTR BOOS…03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 620-5035-725001 592.601321 SOUTH ST/GAS & ELECTR…03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 620-5035-725001

97.401291 SOUTH STREET OFFICE03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 620-5035-725001 154.75500-0616628-000_CONTRACT …03/23/2023496477936U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIA…620-1155-710045

65.50450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…620-5035-710045 756.76CIENEGA WELL LIQUICHLOR03/23/202351001062UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC.620-5035-710060 756.76WELL #5 LIQUICHLOR03/23/202351001063UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC.620-5035-710060 567.58WELL #4 LIQUICHLOR03/23/202351001064UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC.620-5035-710060 567.58WELL #2 LIQUICHLOR03/23/202351001065UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC.620-5035-710060

16.13MAT SERVICE _3/3/23_FINAN…03/23/20235110183714ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…620-1155-710001

42.13BUILDINGS/GROUNDS/STREET…03/23/20235110188466ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…620-5035-731000

2.181291 SOUTH MATS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…620-5035-710015 116.49WATER UNIFORMS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…620-5035-731000

94.60CONT1943-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1350779KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…620-1155-710001

41.50OFFICE SUPPLIES_PAPER_FIN…03/23/2023674825-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 620-1155-710001

51.77OFFICE SUPPLIES_FINANCE _3…03/23/2023675137-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 620-1155-710001

42.41WELL #1 SAN FELIPE & WRIGH…03/23/20236799249759-3 03/23P G AND E 620-5035-725001 214.34LANN LN WATER MAIN BREAK03/23/202373850HOLLISTER LANDSCAPE SUPPLY…620-5035-710040

22.15OVERNIGHT CHARGE_US BAN…03/23/20238-057-17599FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATI…620-1155-710005

6.24 BUG CLEANER/ FUSE03/23/2023923234HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.620-5005-710081 328.23Windows Server 2022 Licensing03/23/2023B16632932SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP.620-1157-731006 946.455035-21117 SMOG INSPECTION03/23/2023FOCS19293TIFFANY MOTOR COMPANY 620-5005-710081 2,261.475035-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 620-5035-740030 321.63FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.620-5035-710015

68.40FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.620-5035-710040 168.93WASH BAY SERVICE03/23/2023S-742245GREEN RUBBER KENNEDY AG, …620-5035-710040 14,791.22CLOW HYDRANT HYDRANT G…03/23/2023U2316010082ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) INC 620-5035-710040 1,009.722- COUPLING03/23/2023U2316010083ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) INC 620-5035-710040 245.38Data Backup Archiving to AWS03/23/2023V2683081EPLUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.620-1157-740014 Fund 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:30,242.00
Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND

14.23BAN #9391023403 02/17/23-3…03/23/2023000019666576AT&T 660-4995-740062

52.60BAN #9391023406 02/17/23-3…03/23/2023000019666579AT&T 660-4995-725010

26.27BAN #9391023408 02/17/23-3…03/23/2023000019666581AT&T 660-4995-725010

13.55BAN #9391037280 2/17/23-3/…03/23/2023000019667481AT&T 660-4995-740062

11.02PUBLIC WORKS WATER03/23/2023000245589DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…660-4995-710015

32.5480-00300-01_674 KLAMMATH…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…660-4995-725005 833.41ERP PRO DOC MANAGEMENT …03/23/2023025-415479TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.660-1155-740027 140.00MONTHLY FEE_WEBSITE-UB O…03/23/2023025-415885TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.660-1155-740027 1,202.024995-80102 TIRES03/23/20231-241306SAN BENITO TIRE INC.660-5005-710082

25.99TRASH GATOR/HAND SANITIZ…03/23/20231-3286CENTRAL AG SUPPLY LLC 660-4995-710015 3,534.184995-72103 TARP03/23/2023158989RMC ENGINEERING, INC.660-5005-710082

41.41AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 660-1155-725010

88.50AT&T02-17-23 to 03-16-2303/23/202319666574AT&T 660-4995-725010 624.13UB_LATE FEE INSERTS_11/8/2…03/23/2023227931INFOSEND, INC 660-1155-740403 1,973.75UB BILLING_FEB 202303/23/2023231203INFOSEND, INC 660-1155-740403 345.844995-20214 BATTERY03/23/202331022928INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CEN…660-5005-710082 2,936.10NASSCO COURSE TRAINING03/23/20233242BACK MUNICIPAL CONSULTING…660-4995-722010

37.00PEST AWAY SERVICE 3/14/23_…03/23/202332900497CLARK PEST CONTROL OF STO…660-1155-740187

97.401291 SOUTH STREET OFFICE03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 660-4995-725001 592.601321 SOUTH ST/GAS & ELECTR…03/23/20233337098344-8 03/23P G AND E 660-4995-725001 154.81500-0616628-000_CONTRACT …03/23/2023496477936U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIA…660-1155-710045

65.50450-9674814-002 COVERAGE …03/23/20235024297182WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL LEAS…660-4995-710045

16.13MAT SERVICE _3/3/23_FINAN…03/23/20235110183714ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…660-1155-710001

15.29BUILDINGS/GROUNDS/STREET…03/23/20235110188466ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…660-4995-731000

16.15BUILDINGS/GROUNDS/STREET…03/23/20235110188466ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…660-7000-731000

2.181291 SOUTH MATS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…660-4995-710015

81.87SEWER UNIFORMS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…660-4995-731000 A.2.d
Packet Pg. 69

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 7 of 12
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 105.821/8 FLOOR PLATE03/23/202354040WRIGHT BROS. WELDING & S…660-5005-710082

94.64CONT1943-01_CONTRACT OV…03/23/202355Y1350779KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTI…660-1155-710001 567.54201 EAST/2ND & EAST PUMP …03/23/20236708513252-9 03/23P G AND E 660-4995-725001 593.08999 ARMORY DRIVE LIFT STAT…03/23/20236708513252-9 03/23P G AND E 660-4995-725001 381.18509 RAVEN ST (ALLENDALE) S…03/23/20236708513252-9 03/23P G AND E 660-4995-725001 244.15684 KLAMATH WAY LIFT STAT…03/23/20236708513252-9 03/23P G AND E 660-4995-725001 1,254.991171 SAN FELIPE ROAD LIFT S…03/23/20236708513252-9 03/23P G AND E 660-4995-725001

41.52OFFICE SUPPLIES_PAPER_FIN…03/23/2023674825-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 660-1155-710001

51.80OFFICE SUPPLIES_FINANCE _3…03/23/2023675137-0TROWBRIDGE ENTERPRISES 660-1155-710001

22.17OVERNIGHT CHARGE_US BAN…03/23/20238-057-17599FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATI…660-1155-710005

4.264995-80102 ROCKER RED03/23/2023923227HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.660-5005-710082

6.24 BUG CLEANER/ FUSE03/23/2023923234HOLLISTER AUTO PARTS, INC.660-5005-710082 328.23Windows Server 2022 Licensing03/23/2023B16632932SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP.660-1157-731006 2,261.474995-SCR911 - FY 22/23 MAR…03/23/2023FY 22/23 MARCH 2023SANTA CRUZ REGIONAL 9-1-1 660-4995-740030 321.64FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.660-4995-710015

68.40FLEET ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUI…03/23/2023GBP048820NICKELL FIRE PROTECTION, INC.660-4995-710040 168.92WASH BAY SERVICE03/23/2023S-742245GREEN RUBBER KENNEDY AG, …660-4995-710040 245.38Data Backup Archiving to AWS03/23/2023V2683081EPLUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.660-1157-740014 Fund 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:19,735.90
Fund: 662 - STORM DRAIN
1,174.44NASSCO COURSE TRAINING03/23/20233242BACK MUNICIPAL CONSULTING…662-5015-722010

57.19SUPPLIES03/23/2023744780MCKINNON LUMBER CO. INC.662-5015-710015 Fund 662 - STORM DRAIN Total:1,231.63
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND

4.56PUBLIC WORKS WATER03/23/2023000245589DAMM SOFTWATER SERVICE I…670-5015-710015

63.60STORM UNIFORMS03/23/20235110188484ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREE…670-5015-731000 105.811/8 FLOOR PLATE03/23/202354040WRIGHT BROS. WELDING & S…670-5005-710083 Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:173.97
Fund: 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND
250.00BRIGGS BLDG ADA UNIT03/23/20236101JAYSON F. CARDINALLI 680-7010-730000 Fund 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND Total:250.00
Fund: 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST

82.2434-07600-00_2830 VALLEY VI…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

78.0254-05005-00_SUNNYSLOPE S…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

78.0254-050000-00_IRG BEVERLY/S…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

78.0254-02015-00_SPRUCE/BEVERL…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

32.5454-01280-00_IRG GLARNER/B…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

78.0254-00770-00_1100 BEVERLY D…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

78.0247-00130-04_BONNIE VW_W…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

32.5454-00010-00_BEVERLY DRIVE_…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005

78.0234-05112-00_1600 PANORAM…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…709-8050-725005 285.00BF TEST SERIAL#J013314,#BJ6…03/23/202340357SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI…709-8050-710040 1,009.00MAR 2023 VALLEY VIEW PARK …03/23/20238310184BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…709-8050-730000 577.00MAR 2023 LAS BRISAS PARK L…03/23/20238310185BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…709-8050-730000 135.00MAR 2023 BUENA VISTA (ZONE…03/23/20238310207BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…709-8050-730000 103.00MAR 2023 VALLEYVIEW EST-AI…03/23/20238310208BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…709-8050-730000

55.00MAR 2023 PALMTAG-SAN BEN…03/23/20238310209BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…709-8050-730000 990.00MAR 2023 CREEKBRIDGE-SUN…03/23/20238310210BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…709-8050-730000

45.00MAR 2023 ROYAL CT&NASH R…03/23/20238310287BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…709-8050-730000 Fund 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST Total:3,814.44
Fund: 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES

62.0860-03270-01_1200 BONNIE VI…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…712-8050-725005

78.0248-00598-01_2191 MIMOSA S…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…712-8050-725005

32.5450-05525-01_1171 SANTA ANA…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…712-8050-725005

53.9450-05555-04_811 SANTA ANA …03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…712-8050-725005

32.5466-05768-01_211 LUCERO DR…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…712-8050-725005

78.3460-00164-01_1450 TRINITY CI…03/23/202301/20/23 TO 02/20/23SUNNYSLOPE COUNTY WATER…712-8050-725005 8,073.973/11/23 EMERG. CALLOUT 3 P…03/23/202340356SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI…712-8050-710040 752.56SOUNDWALL PAINT03/23/202362336HOLLISTER PAINT CO., INC.712-7000-710040 A.2.d
Packet Pg. 70

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 8 of 12
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Description (Item)Account Number 914.00MAR 2023 ALLENDALE PARK L…03/23/20238310179BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…712-8050-730000 257.00MAR 2023 NORA DRIVE PARK …03/23/20238310186BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…712-8050-730000 1,261.58MAR 2023 MAPLE PARK (ZONE…03/23/20238310286BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…712-8050-730000 1,657.50MAR 2023-LADD RANCH SAN …03/23/20238310290BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…712-5015-730000 682.50MAR 2023 ORCHARD PD/ROSA…03/23/20238310291BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…712-5015-730000 487.50MAR 2023 WALNUT PK/PANO…03/23/20238310292BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…712-5015-730000 195.00MAR 2023 HILLCREST(POND 15…03/23/20238310293BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERV…712-5015-730000 Fund 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES Total:14,619.07
Grand Total:380,662.14
A.2.d
Packet Pg. 71

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 9 of 12
Fund Summary
Fund Expense Amount
101 - General Fund 306,268.12
203 - Gas Tax 2,404.50
601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND 1,922.51
620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND 30,242.00
660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND 19,735.90
662 - STORM DRAIN 1,231.63
670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND 173.97
680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND 250.00
709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST 3,814.44
712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES 14,619.07
Grand Total:380,662.14
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
101-101106 Cash Drawer - Police 300.00
101-101114 Petty Cash - Recreation S…300.00
101-1100-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4,486.50
101-1100-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 479.52
101-1100-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 865.60
101-1100-725010 TELEPHONE 193.10
101-1105-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 16.00
101-1105-740087 CONTRACTS: LEGAL SERVI…85,333.46
101-1110-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 20.77
101-1110-725010 TELEPHONE 16.00
101-1110-728000 LEGAL NOTICES 483.90
101-1120-701002 SALARIES TEMPORARY 10,562.33
101-1120-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 20.77
101-1120-725010 TELEPHONE 16.00
101-1120-730000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 369.00
101-1125-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 246.60
101-1125-725010 TELEPHONE 77.31
101-1155-701002 SALARIES TEMPORARY 22,254.27
101-1155-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 204.00
101-1155-710005 POSTAGE 22.15
101-1155-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 154.75
101-1155-725010 TELEPHONE 25.80
101-1155-740187 CONTRACTS: PEST CONT…37.00
101-1157-725010 TELEPHONE 15.08
101-1157-731006 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 641.55
101-1157-740014 CONTRACTS: NETWORK S…479.60
101-1160-701002 SALARIES TEMPORARY 6,496.00
101-1160-725010 TELEPHONE 31.84
101-2025-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 239.00
101-2025-725010 TELEPHONE 60.85
101-2205-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 317.48
101-2205-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 211.58
101-2205-710016 LAB & MEDICAL 4,360.71
101-2205-710020 COMMUNICATIONS 145.25
101-2205-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 170.00
101-2205-722010 TRAINING 2,095.99
101-2205-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 2,325.27
101-2205-725005 WATER/SEWER 691.85
101-2205-725010 TELEPHONE 129.62
101-2205-730000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 297.50
101-2205-740015 ALARM MONITORING 275.00
101-2205-740030 Contracts: Comm 911 45,892.20
101-2205-740187 CONTRACTS: PEST CONT…240.00
101-2205-750050 IMPROVEMENTS 319.84
101-2500-701026 RETIREE MEDICARE CONT…800.00
A.2.d
Packet Pg. 72

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 10 of 12
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
101-2500-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 167.94
101-2500-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 357.65
101-2500-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 119.20
101-2500-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 804.58
101-2500-722010 TRAINING 993.50
101-2500-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 12,717.37
101-2500-725010 TELEPHONE 952.11
101-2500-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 1,285.04
101-2500-731006 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 745.98
101-2500-740016 Contracts: Alarm 185.74
101-2500-740030 Contracts: Comm 911 45,892.31
101-270012 DEPOSITS: RECREATION 250.00
101-280002 REIMBURSABLE: PARKING…1,960.00
101-4000-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 607.50
101-4000-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 432.80
101-4000-725010 TELEPHONE 108.97
101-4000-740279 CONTRACTS: PEST CONT…105.00
101-4010-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 432.79
101-4010-725010 TELEPHONE 46.47
101-4010-740017 CONTRACTS: PEST CONT…105.00
101-4100-730000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000.00
101-5005-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 395.72
101-5005-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 1,450.90
101-5005-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 65.51
101-5005-710071 CITY HALL VEHICLE MAINT 25.00
101-5005-710074 FIRE VEHICLE MAINT 6.25
101-5005-710075 FLEET VEHICLE MAINT 159.99
101-5005-710076 PARKS VEHICLE MAINT 6.25
101-5005-710077 POLICE VEHICLE MAINT 1,896.02
101-5005-710079 STREETS VEHICLE MAINT 975.17
101-5005-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 689.99
101-5005-725010 TELEPHONE 42.68
101-5005-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 29.02
101-5010-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 758.10
101-5010-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 545.95
101-5010-710045 Rentals/Leases 65.51
101-5010-710061 STREET SIGNS 2,575.73
101-5010-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 689.99
101-5010-725010 TELEPHONE 20.81
101-5010-730000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,660.30
101-5010-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 40.72
101-5010-740030 CONTRACTS: COMM 911 2,261.47
101-5015-730000 Professional Services 675.00
101-7000-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 505.61
101-7000-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 353.68
101-7000-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 65.50
101-7000-725001 Gas/Electric 689.99
101-7000-725010 Telephone 180.29
101-7000-731000 Uniform Purchases 49.26
101-7020-725010 TELEPHONE 136.09
101-8000-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.90
101-8000-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 43.99
101-8000-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 327.54
101-8000-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 1,752.68
101-8000-725010 TELEPHONE 166.30
101-8000-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 17.50
101-8000-740016 CONTRACTS: ALARMS 275.00
101-8000-740027 CONTRACT: COMPUTER P…13,664.70
A.2.d
Packet Pg. 73

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 11 of 12
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
101-8000-740092 CONTRACTS: HVAC MAIN…895.00
101-8050-710015 Operating Supplies 11.24
101-8050-725001 Gas/Electric 1,648.04
101-8050-725005 Water/Sewer 131.24
101-8050-730000 Professional Services 257.00
101-8050-731000 Uniform Purchases 17.50
203-5010-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 54.60
203-5010-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 2,349.90
601-1157-731006 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 193.95
601-1157-740014 CONTRACTS: NETWORK S…145.00
601-4200-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,002.69
601-4200-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 327.54
601-4200-725010 TELEPHONE 142.33
601-4200-740187 CONTRACTS: PEST CONT…111.00
620-1155-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 204.00
620-1155-710005 POSTAGE 22.15
620-1155-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 154.75
620-1155-725010 TELEPHONE 41.41
620-1155-740027 CONTRACT: COMPUTER P…973.41
620-1155-740187 CONTRACTS: PEST CONT…37.00
620-1155-740403 CONTRACTS: UTILITY BILL…2,597.88
620-1157-731006 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 328.23
620-1157-740014 CONTRACTS: NETWORK S…245.38
620-5005-710081 WATER VEHICLE MAINTE…952.69
620-5035-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 357.79
620-5035-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 16,252.61
620-5035-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 65.50
620-5035-710060 Chemicals 2,648.68
620-5035-722010 TRAINING 1,761.66
620-5035-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 967.08
620-5035-725010 TELEPHONE 183.89
620-5035-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 158.62
620-5035-740030 Contracts: Comm 911 2,261.47
620-5035-740194 CONTRACTS: SCADA SUP…27.80
660-1155-710001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 204.09
660-1155-710005 POSTAGE 22.17
660-1155-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 154.81
660-1155-725010 TELEPHONE 41.41
660-1155-740027 CONTRACT: COMPUTER P…973.41
660-1155-740187 CONTRACTS: PEST CONT…37.00
660-1155-740403 CONTRACTS: UTILITY BILL…2,597.88
660-1157-731006 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 328.23
660-1157-740014 CONTRACTS: NETWORK S…245.38
660-4995-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 360.83
660-4995-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 237.32
660-4995-710045 RENTALS/LEASES 65.50
660-4995-722010 TRAINING 2,936.10
660-4995-725001 GAS/ELECTRIC 3,730.94
660-4995-725005 WATER/SEWER 32.54
660-4995-725010 TELEPHONE 167.37
660-4995-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 97.16
660-4995-740030 Contracts: Comm 911 2,261.47
660-4995-740062 CONTRACTS: SCADA SUP…27.78
660-5005-710082 SEWER VEHICLE MAINT 5,198.36
660-7000-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 16.15
662-5015-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 57.19
662-5015-722010 TRAINING 1,174.44
670-5005-710083 STREET SWEEPING VEHIC…105.81
A.2.d
Packet Pg. 74

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16072 - AP 3-28-23 3/29/2023 2:11:09 PM Page 12 of 12
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
670-5015-710015 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4.56
670-5015-731000 UNIFORM PURCHASES 63.60
680-7010-730000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250.00
709-8050-710040 Repairs/Maintenance 285.00
709-8050-725005 Water/Sewer 615.44
709-8050-730000 Professional Services 2,914.00
712-5015-730000 Professional Services 3,022.50
712-7000-710040 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 752.56
712-8050-710040 Repairs/Maintenance 8,073.97
712-8050-725005 Water/Sewer 337.46
712-8050-730000 Professional Services 2,432.58
Grand Total:380,662.14
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Expense Amount
**None**312,158.25
E2031-710015 4,486.50
FD400003-725005 65.08
FD400007-730000 1,914.50
FD400009-730000 682.50
FD400010-730000 487.50
FD400011-725005 62.08
FD400013-730000 1,261.58
FD400014-725005 78.34
FD400014-730000 195.00
FD400016-725005 53.94
FD400017-710040 752.56
FD400017-730000 914.00
FD400020-725005 78.02
FS400001-710001 317.48
FS400001-710015 211.58
FS400001-710016 2,175.94
FS400001-710020 145.25
FS400001-710040 170.00
FS400001-722010 575.99
FS400001-725010 84.38
FS400001-730000 297.50
FS400001-740015 135.00
FS400001-740030 11,473.05
FS400001-740187 65.00
FS400001-750050 319.84
FS400002-710016 728.26
FS400002-725001 2,325.27
FS400002-725005 691.85
FS400002-725010 45.24
FS400002-740015 140.00
FS400002-740030 11,473.05
FS400002-740187 65.00
FS400003-710016 728.26
FS400003-740030 11,473.05
FS400003-740187 50.00
FS400004-710016 728.25
FS400004-722010 1,520.00
FS400004-740030 11,473.05
FS400004-740187 60.00
Grand Total:380,662.14
A.2.d
Packet Pg. 75

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:AGENDA ITEM: Consent
STUDY SESSION DATE: N/A
.TITLE OF ITEM: Warrant Register -- General-Special-Enterprise-Assessment Funds .BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register
.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the report and register(s) attached.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

FUND REGISTER TOTAL:$655,364.86
General Fund:$0.00
Special Fund:$0.00
Capital Projects Fund:$0.00
Enterprise Fund:$0.00
Assessment Fund:$0.00
Fund 850/851 $0.00
Amount Transferred to Payroll:$655,364.86
TOTAL AMOUNT DISBURSED:$655,364.86
DEPARTMENT:Administrative Services Department
CONTACT PERSON:

Valera Key, Accounting Technician II
PHONE NUMBER:(831) 636-4301 ext. 22
March 29, 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Sufficient resources are available in each of the funds listed above to satisfy the amount of the warrant and payroll disbursements on this register.

Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION_________________________________________________ Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst
A.2.e
Packet Pg. 76

Page 11 of 113 ends

Payroll Check Register
City of Hollister Report Summary
Pay Period: 3/11/2023-3/24/2023
Packet: PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23
Payroll Set: CITY OF HOLLISTER - 01
Type
17 Count
0 22,439.48

0.00 Regular Checks
Manual Checks
0 0.00
0 0.00
Amount
245 632,925.38
Total 262 655,364.86
Reversals
Voided Checks
Direct Deposits
A.2.e
Packet Pg. 77

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:AGENDA ITEM: Consent
STUDY SESSION DATE: N/A
.TITLE OF ITEM: Warrant Register -- General-Special-Enterprise-Assessment Funds .BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register
.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the report and register(s) attached.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

FUND REGISTER TOTAL:$354,550.76
General Fund:$297,268.58
Special Fund:$12,858.50
Capital Projects Fund:$0.00
Enterprise Fund:$42,886.61
Assessment Fund:$370.07
Fund 850/851 $1,167.00
Amount Transferred to Payroll:$0.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DISBURSED:$354,550.76
DEPARTMENT:Administrative Services Department
CONTACT PERSON:

Valera Key, Accounting Technician II
PHONE NUMBER:(831) 636-4301 ext. 22
March 29, 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Sufficient resources are available in each of the funds listed above to satisfy the amount of the warrant and payroll disbursements on this register.

Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION_________________________________________________ Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 78

3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 1 of 8
Expense Approval Register
City of Hollister Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Payable Number Account Number Vendor: EFTPS
Fund: 101 - General Fund
482.98INV003987303/29/2023INV0039873EFTPS 101-240014
90,430.15INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 101-240006 20,809.40INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 101-240012 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:111,722.53
Fund: 203 - Gas Tax
1,218.63INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 203-240006
365.04INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 203-240012
Fund 203 - Gas Tax Total:1,583.67
Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1
3,274.56INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 218-240006
502.56INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 218-240012
Fund 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 Total:3,777.12
Fund: 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001

27.58INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 275-240006

8.28INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 275-240012
Fund 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001 Total:35.86
Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
1,093.01INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 601-240006
339.06INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 601-240012
Fund 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:1,432.07
Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
5,084.34INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 620-240006
1,628.56INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 620-240012
Fund 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:6,712.90
Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND
4,697.77INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 660-240006
1,359.94INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 660-240012
Fund 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:6,057.71
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND
1,053.82INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 670-240006
356.80INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 670-240012
Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:1,410.62
Fund: 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND

8.67INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 680-240006

3.78INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 680-240012
Fund 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND Total:12.45
Fund: 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST

12.78INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 709-240006

12.66INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 709-240012
Fund 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST Total:25.44
Fund: 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES

65.72INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 712-240006

29.94INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 712-240012
Fund 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES Total:95.66
Fund: 851 - HOUSING
224.99INV003987403/29/2023INV0039874EFTPS 851-240006
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 79

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 2 of 8
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Payable Number Account Number 113.48INV003987503/29/2023INV0039875EFTPS 851-240012
Fund 851 - HOUSING Total:338.47
Vendor EFTPS Total:133,204.50
Vendor: EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Fund: 101 - General Fund
38,278.94INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…101-240016 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:38,278.94
Fund: 203 - Gas Tax
402.66INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…203-240016 Fund 203 - Gas Tax Total:402.66
Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1
1,184.95INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…218-240016 Fund 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 Total:1,184.95
Fund: 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001

10.81INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…275-240016 Fund 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001 Total:10.81
Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
337.34INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…601-240016 Fund 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:337.34
Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
2,327.88INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…620-240016 Fund 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:2,327.88
Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND
1,830.85INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…660-240016 Fund 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:1,830.85
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND
377.76INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…670-240016 Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:377.76
Fund: 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND

2.29INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…680-240016 Fund 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND Total:2.29
Fund: 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST

4.59INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…709-240016 Fund 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST Total:4.59
Fund: 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES

24.03INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…712-240016 Fund 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES Total:24.03
Fund: 851 - HOUSING
191.21INV003987203/29/2023INV0039872EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT…851-240016 Fund 851 - HOUSING Total:191.21
Vendor EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Total:44,973.31 Vendor: INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT
Fund: 101 - General Fund
1,667.37INV003983403/29/2023INV0039834INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004 1,711.64INV003983503/29/2023INV0039835INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004 310.11INV003983703/29/2023INV0039837INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004 105.68INV003983803/29/2023INV0039838INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004 112.08INV003983903/29/2023INV0039839INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004 152.29INV003984003/29/2023INV0039840INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004 569.95INV003984203/29/2023INV0039842INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004

76.01INV003984303/29/2023INV0039843INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…101-240004 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:4,705.13
Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1

40.73INV003984003/29/2023INV0039840INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…218-240004 Fund 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 Total:40.73
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 80

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 3 of 8
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Payable Number Account Number Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
334.25INV003983403/29/2023INV0039834INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…601-240004 Fund 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:334.25
Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND

26.92INV003983403/29/2023INV0039834INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…620-240004 272.69INV003983603/29/2023INV0039836INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…620-240004 406.82INV003983803/29/2023INV0039838INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…620-240004

52.78INV003983903/29/2023INV0039839INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…620-240004 Fund 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:759.21
Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND

26.90INV003983403/29/2023INV0039834INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…660-240004 156.99INV003983703/29/2023INV0039837INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…660-240004 103.87INV003983803/29/2023INV0039838INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…660-240004

52.77INV003983903/29/2023INV0039839INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…660-240004 293.80INV003984103/29/2023INV0039841INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…660-240004 Fund 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:634.33
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND
151.53INV003983903/29/2023INV0039839INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…670-240004 Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:151.53
Vendor INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT Total:6,625.18
Vendor: P.E.R.S.

Fund: 101 - General Fund
8,393.38INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.101-240015 11,518.32INV003984503/29/2023INV0039845P.E.R.S.101-240015 10,795.31INV003984603/29/2023INV0039846P.E.R.S.101-240015 19,159.02INV003984703/29/2023INV0039847P.E.R.S.101-240015 5,049.74INV003984803/29/2023INV0039848P.E.R.S.101-240015 11,323.35INV003984903/29/2023INV0039849P.E.R.S.101-240015 9,875.76INV003985003/29/2023INV0039850P.E.R.S.101-240015 6,545.69INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.101-240015 4,288.74INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.101-240015 1,595.24INV003985403/29/2023INV0039854P.E.R.S.101-240015 2,078.39INV003985503/29/2023INV0039855P.E.R.S.101-240015 9,288.77INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.101-240015 262.81INV003985703/29/2023INV0039857P.E.R.S.101-240015

15.77INV003985803/29/2023INV0039858P.E.R.S.101-240015
10,502.75INV003985903/29/2023INV0039859P.E.R.S.101-240015 1,061.56INV003986003/29/2023INV0039860P.E.R.S.101-240015 4,417.46INV003986103/29/2023INV0039861P.E.R.S.101-240015 10,589.02INV003986203/29/2023INV0039862P.E.R.S.101-240015 130.16INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.101-240009
1,530.70INV003986503/29/2023INV0039865P.E.R.S.101-240015 613.10INV003986603/29/2023INV0039866P.E.R.S.101-240015
1,066.34INV003986703/29/2023INV0039867P.E.R.S.101-240015 818.46INV003986803/29/2023INV0039868P.E.R.S.101-240015
5,583.10INV003986903/29/2023INV0039869P.E.R.S.101-240015 2,115.70INV003987003/29/2023INV0039870P.E.R.S.101-240015

0.76PR 03-29-23 ROUNDNG03/29/2023PR 03-29-23 ROUNDNGP.E.R.S.101-1155-701005 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:138,619.40
Fund: 203 - Gas Tax

92.83INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.203-240015
1,017.45INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.203-240015 666.63INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.203-240015

93.13INV003985403/29/2023INV0039854P.E.R.S.203-240015
121.32INV003985503/29/2023INV0039855P.E.R.S.203-240015
102.74INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.203-240015

2.96INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.203-240009
Fund 203 - Gas Tax Total:2,097.06
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 81

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 4 of 8
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Payable Number Account Number Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1
1,198.52INV003984703/29/2023INV0039847P.E.R.S.218-240015 480.06INV003985003/29/2023INV0039850P.E.R.S.218-240015
1,206.66INV003985903/29/2023INV0039859P.E.R.S.218-240015 457.25INV003986103/29/2023INV0039861P.E.R.S.218-240015

1.87INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.218-240009
Fund 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 Total:3,344.36
Fund: 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001

19.26INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.275-240015

21.31INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.275-240015

0.06INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.275-240009
Fund 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001 Total:40.63
Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
515.63INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.601-240015
408.12INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.601-240015
267.40INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.601-240015
570.62INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.601-240015

3.72INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.601-240009
Fund 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:1,765.49
Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
2,246.54INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.620-240015 1,934.92INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.620-240015 1,267.76INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.620-240015 2,486.16INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.620-240015

13.14INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.620-240009
Fund 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:7,948.52
Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND
1,564.61INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.660-240015 2,159.14INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.660-240015 1,414.73INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.660-240015

65.71INV003985403/29/2023INV0039854P.E.R.S.660-240015

85.62INV003985503/29/2023INV0039855P.E.R.S.660-240015
1,731.48INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.660-240015

11.24INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.660-240009
Fund 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:7,032.53
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND
513.87INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.670-240015
569.28INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.670-240015
372.93INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.670-240015
568.65INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.670-240015

6.19INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.670-240009
Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:2,030.92
Fund: 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND

8.78INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.680-240015

9.71INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.680-240015

0.07INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.680-240009
Fund 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND Total:18.56
Fund: 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST

17.22INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.709-240015

7.83INV003985403/29/2023INV0039854P.E.R.S.709-240015

10.20INV003985503/29/2023INV0039855P.E.R.S.709-240015

19.05INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.709-240015

0.19INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.709-240009
Fund 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST Total:54.49
Fund: 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES

28.03INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.712-240015

48.82INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.712-240015

31.99INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.712-240015
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 82

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 5 of 8
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Payable Number Account Number

7.83INV003985403/29/2023INV0039854P.E.R.S.712-240015

10.20INV003985503/29/2023INV0039855P.E.R.S.712-240015

31.00INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.712-240015

0.46INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.712-240009
Fund 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES Total:158.33
Fund: 851 - HOUSING
232.44INV003984403/29/2023INV0039844P.E.R.S.851-240015

57.36INV003985203/29/2023INV0039852P.E.R.S.851-240015

37.57INV003985303/29/2023INV0039853P.E.R.S.851-240015
257.24INV003985603/29/2023INV0039856P.E.R.S.851-240015

1.06INV003986303/29/2023INV0039863P.E.R.S.851-240009
Fund 851 - HOUSING Total:585.67
Vendor P.E.R.S. Total:163,695.96
Vendor: SAN BENITO COUNTY SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIVISION
Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1
194.23INV003987103/29/2023INV0039871SAN BENITO COUNTY SHERIFF'…218-240007 Fund 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 Total:194.23
Vendor SAN BENITO COUNTY SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIVISION Total:194.23 Vendor: SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC
Fund: 101 - General Fund
215.53INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 101-240005 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:215.53
Fund: 203 - Gas Tax

77.97INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 203-240005 Fund 203 - Gas Tax Total:77.97
Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
113.71INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 601-240005 Fund 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:113.71
Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
378.55INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 620-240005 Fund 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:378.55
Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND
326.94INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 660-240005 Fund 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:326.94
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND
238.98INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 670-240005 Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:238.98
Fund: 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST

1.10INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 709-240005 Fund 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST Total:1.10
Fund: 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES

6.43INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 712-240005 Fund 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES Total:6.43
Fund: 851 - HOUSING

51.65INV003986403/29/2023INV0039864SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC 851-240005 Fund 851 - HOUSING Total:51.65
Vendor SEIU LOCAL 521/CTW, CLC Total:1,410.86
Vendor: STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
Fund: 101 - General Fund
1,530.46INV003983203/29/2023INV0039832STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 101-240007 553.85INV003983303/29/2023INV0039833STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 101-240007 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:2,084.31
Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND
256.61INV003983003/29/2023INV0039830STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 670-240007 A.2.f
Packet Pg. 83

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 6 of 8
AmountVendor Name Payable Number Post Date Payable Number Account Number 394.61INV003983103/29/2023INV0039831STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 670-240007 Fund 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:651.22
Vendor STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Total:2,735.53
Vendor: STATE OF CA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
Fund: 101 - General Fund
1,642.74INV003985103/29/2023INV0039851STATE OF CA FRANCHISE TAX …101-240007 Fund 101 - General Fund Total:1,642.74
Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1

68.45INV003985103/29/2023INV0039851STATE OF CA FRANCHISE TAX …218-240007 Fund 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 Total:68.45
Vendor STATE OF CA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total:1,711.19
Grand Total:354,550.76
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 84

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 7 of 8
Fund Summary
Fund Expense Amount
101 - General Fund 297,268.58
203 - Gas Tax 4,161.36
218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 8,609.84
275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001 87.30
601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND 3,982.86
620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND 18,127.06
660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND 15,882.36
670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND 4,861.03
680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND 33.30
709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST 85.62
712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES 284.45
851 - HOUSING 1,167.00
Grand Total:354,550.76
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
101-1155-701005 Retirement 0.76
101-240004 PAYROLL: DEFERRED CO…4,705.13
101-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 215.53
101-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…90,430.15
101-240007 PAYROLL: GARNISHMENTS 3,727.05
101-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…130.16
101-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 20,809.40
101-240014 PAYROLL: FICA OASDI 482.98
101-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 138,488.48
101-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…38,278.94
203-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 77.97
203-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…1,218.63
203-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…2.96
203-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 365.04
203-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 2,094.10
203-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…402.66
218-240004 PAYROLL: DEFERRED CO…40.73
218-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…3,274.56
218-240007 PAYROLL: GARNISHMENTS 262.68
218-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…1.87
218-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 502.56
218-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 3,342.49
218-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…1,184.95
275-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…27.58
275-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…0.06
275-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 8.28
275-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 40.57
275-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…10.81
601-240004 PAYROLL: DEFERRED CO…334.25
601-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 113.71
601-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…1,093.01
601-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…3.72
601-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 339.06
601-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 1,761.77
601-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…337.34
620-240004 PAYROLL: DEFERRED CO…759.21
620-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 378.55
620-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…5,084.34
620-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…13.14
620-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 1,628.56
620-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 7,935.38
620-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…2,327.88
660-240004 PAYROLL: DEFERRED CO…634.33
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 85

Expense Approval Register Packet: APPKT16062 - PYPKT03001 - PPE 03/24/23 PAID 03/29/23 3/29/2023 2:24:39 PM Page 8 of 8
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Expense Amount
660-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 326.94
660-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…4,697.77
660-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…11.24
660-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 1,359.94
660-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 7,021.29
660-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…1,830.85
670-240004 PAYROLL: DEFERRED CO…151.53
670-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 238.98
670-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…1,053.82
670-240007 PAYROLL: GARNISHMENTS 651.22
670-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…6.19
670-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 356.80
670-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 2,024.73
670-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…377.76
680-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…8.67
680-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…0.07
680-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 3.78
680-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 18.49
680-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…2.29
709-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 1.10
709-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…12.78
709-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…0.19
709-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 12.66
709-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 54.30
709-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…4.59
712-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 6.43
712-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…65.72
712-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…0.46
712-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 29.94
712-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 157.87
712-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…24.03
851-240005 PAYROLL: SEIU DUES 51.65
851-240006 PAYROLL: FEDERAL WITH…224.99
851-240009 PAYROLL: HEALTH INSUR…1.06
851-240012 PAYROLL: MEDICARE 113.48
851-240015 PAYROLL: PERS 584.61
851-240016 PAYROLL: STATE WITHHO…191.21
Grand Total:354,550.76
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Expense Amount
**None**354,550.76
Grand Total:354,550.76
A.2.f
Packet Pg. 86

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE:AGENDA ITEM: Consent
STUDY SESSION DATE: N/A
.TITLE OF ITEM: Warrant Register -- General-Special-Enterprise-Assessment Funds .BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Audit attached warrant register
.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Review and approve the report and register(s) attached.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

FUND REGISTER TOTAL:$608,294.25
General Fund:$469,624.26
Special Fund:$35,013.72
Capital Projects Fund:$371.00
Enterprise Fund:$81,347.19
Assessment Fund:$19,898.60
Fund 850/851 $2,039.48
Amount Transferred to Payroll:$0.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DISBURSED:$608,294.25
DEPARTMENT:Administrative Services Department
CONTACT PERSON:

Valera Key, Accounting Technician II
PHONE NUMBER:(831) 636-4301 ext. 22
March 31, 2023
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Sufficient resources are available in each of the funds listed above to satisfy the amount of the warrant and payroll disbursements on this register.

Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION_________________________________________________ Cecilia Rodriguez, Management Analyst
A.2.g
Packet Pg. 87

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 88

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 89

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 90

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 91

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 92

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 93

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 94

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 95

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 96

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 97

A.2.g
Packet Pg. 98

4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 1 of 13
Budget Report
City of Hollister Group Summary
For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
Fund: 101 - General Fund
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 228,538.2914,154.68263,650.00 263,650.00 35,111.71 86.68 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 343,933.294,752.12788,500.00 788,500.00 444,566.71 43.62 % 750 - CAPITAL 80,501.430.000.00 0.00 -80,501.43 0.00 %
652,973.0118,906.801,052,150.00 1,052,150.00 399,176.99Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:62.06 % Department: 1105 - CITY COUNCIL
701 - PERSONNEL 105,414.5821,297.1688,607.00 88,607.00 -16,807.58 118.97 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 74,790.4119,473.86365,792.00 365,792.00 291,001.59 20.45 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 656,730.2285,483.46288,000.00 288,000.00 -368,730.22 228.03 % 836,935.21126,254.48742,399.00 742,399.00 -94,536.21Department: 1105 - CITY COUNCIL Total:112.73 % Department: 1110 - CITY CLERK / ELECTIONS
701 - PERSONNEL 310,101.6752,978.78549,651.00 549,651.00 239,549.33 56.42 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 32,741.464,512.72136,050.00 136,050.00 103,308.54 24.07 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 214,331.530.00295,010.00 295,010.00 80,678.47 72.65 % 750 - CAPITAL 0.000.0012,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 0.00 % 557,174.6657,491.50992,711.00 992,711.00 435,536.34Department: 1110 - CITY CLERK / ELECTIONS Total:56.13 % Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER
701 - PERSONNEL 814,689.69349,355.57555,224.00 555,224.00 -259,465.69 146.73 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 3,261,260.2312,332.4156,873.00 56,873.00 -3,204,387.23 5,734.29 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 413.840.002,500.00 2,500.00 2,086.16 16.55 % 4,076,363.76361,687.98614,597.00 614,597.00 -3,461,766.76Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER Total:663.26 % Department: 1125 - RDA GENERAL
701 - PERSONNEL 17,084.641,590.29172,651.00 172,651.00 155,566.36 9.90 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 11,928.932,438.0674,049.00 74,049.00 62,120.07 16.11 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 770.8098.703,300.00 3,300.00 2,529.20 23.36 % 29,784.374,127.05250,000.00 250,000.00 220,215.63Department: 1125 - RDA GENERAL Total:11.91 % Department: 1150 - CITY TREASURER
701 - PERSONNEL 20,861.61509.4034,867.00 34,867.00 14,005.39 59.83 % 20,861.61509.4034,867.00 34,867.00 14,005.39Department: 1150 - CITY TREASURER Total:59.83 % Department: 1155 - FINANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 630,101.28110,967.45803,054.00 803,054.00 172,952.72 78.46 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 46,929.573,071.1663,952.00 63,952.00 17,022.43 73.38 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 35,949.66239.2739,850.00 39,850.00 3,900.34 90.21 % 712,980.51114,277.88906,856.00 906,856.00 193,875.49Department: 1155 - FINANCE Total:78.62 % Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS
701 - PERSONNEL 194,638.5726,753.91379,585.00 379,585.00 184,946.43 51.28 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 63,742.9316,285.7496,000.00 96,000.00 32,257.07 66.40 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 161,543.309,395.16243,750.00 251,676.00 90,132.70 64.19 % 750 - CAPITAL 0.000.0015,100.00 15,100.00 15,100.00 0.00 % 419,924.8052,434.81734,435.00 742,361.00 322,436.20Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS Total:56.57 % Department: 1160 - HUMAN RESOURCES
701 - PERSONNEL 332,618.0953,974.46566,314.00 566,314.00 233,695.91 58.73 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 107,642.2218,096.9094,050.00 94,050.00 -13,592.22 114.45 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 12,587.16220.0013,000.00 13,000.00 412.84 96.82 % 452,847.4772,291.36673,364.00 673,364.00 220,516.53Department: 1160 - HUMAN RESOURCES Total:67.25 % Department: 2025 - ANIMAL CONTROL
701 - PERSONNEL 471,620.8258,378.46674,007.00 674,007.00 202,386.18 69.97 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 135,901.2410,271.41164,061.00 164,061.00 28,159.76 82.84 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 99

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 2 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
740 - CONTRACTUAL 34,468.314,721.8342,250.00 42,250.00 7,781.69 81.58 % 750 - CAPITAL 12,492.5811,922.5868,000.00 68,000.00 55,507.42 18.37 % 654,482.9585,294.28948,318.00 948,318.00 293,835.05Department: 2025 - ANIMAL CONTROL Total:69.02 % Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 8,751,422.621,200,057.1510,009,255.00 10,009,255.00 1,257,832.38 87.43 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 505,533.4066,047.90701,909.00 701,909.00 196,375.60 72.02 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 921,657.89106,154.391,062,272.00 1,062,272.00 140,614.11 86.76 % 750 - CAPITAL 251,417.0368,564.44251,000.00 408,000.00 156,582.97 61.62 % 10,430,030.941,440,823.8812,024,436.00 12,181,436.00 1,751,405.06Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT Total:85.62 % Department: 2207 - SOLID WASTE CONTRACTS/HAZ STAFF
701 - PERSONNEL 7,621.191,259.009,420.00 9,420.00 1,798.81 80.90 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 26,793.135,259.0643,750.00 43,750.00 16,956.87 61.24 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 1,360.000.00250,000.00 250,000.00 248,640.00 0.54 % 35,774.326,518.06303,170.00 303,170.00 267,395.68Department: 2207 - SOLID WASTE CONTRACTS/HAZ STAFF Total:11.80 % Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 6,709,936.09994,914.189,139,069.00 9,139,069.00 2,429,132.91 73.42 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 795,141.6363,708.28741,337.00 741,337.00 -53,804.63 107.26 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 435,171.3993,977.78521,300.00 521,300.00 86,128.61 83.48 % 750 - CAPITAL 225,901.9816,852.92410,000.00 410,000.00 184,098.02 55.10 % 8,166,151.091,169,453.1610,811,706.00 10,811,706.00 2,645,554.91Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT Total:75.53 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
701 - PERSONNEL 609,242.44110,539.54864,595.00 864,595.00 255,352.56 70.47 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 391,218.483,866.7981,089.00 81,089.00 -310,129.48 482.46 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 625,931.7712,873.36115,000.00 115,000.00 -510,931.77 544.29 % 750 - CAPITAL 91,190.68754.6091,500.00 91,500.00 309.32 99.66 % 1,717,583.37128,034.291,152,184.00 1,152,184.00 -565,399.37Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:149.07 % Department: 4005 - BUILDING DIVISION
701 - PERSONNEL 0.000.00350,000.00 350,000.00 350,000.00 0.00 %

0.000.00350,000.00 350,000.00 350,000.00Department: 4005 - BUILDING DIVISION Total:0.00 % Department: 4010 - Planning Division
701 - PERSONNEL 487,313.9785,386.401,321,217.00 1,321,217.00 833,903.03 36.88 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,091,036.20124,406.53251,028.00 251,028.00 -840,008.20 434.63 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 1,955,930.60258,011.54510,000.00 510,000.00 -1,445,930.60 383.52 % 750 - CAPITAL 2,972.030.00203,000.00 203,000.00 200,027.97 1.46 % 3,537,252.80467,804.472,285,245.00 2,285,245.00 -1,252,007.80Department: 4010 - Planning Division Total:154.79 % Department: 4100 - RISK MANAGEMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 33,037.532,096.8581,200.00 81,200.00 48,162.47 40.69 % 33,037.532,096.8581,200.00 81,200.00 48,162.47Department: 4100 - RISK MANAGEMENT Total:40.69 % Department: 4300 - CODE ENFORCEMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 27,712.130.000.00 0.00 -27,712.13 0.00 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,388.080.000.00 0.00 -1,388.08 0.00 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 466.6458.330.00 0.00 -466.64 0.00 %
29,566.8558.330.00 0.00 -29,566.85Department: 4300 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 198,341.5528,456.90265,250.00 265,250.00 66,908.45 74.78 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 274,277.6329,780.37285,544.00 285,544.00 11,266.37 96.05 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 11,700.56393.7914,800.00 14,800.00 3,099.44 79.06 % 750 - CAPITAL 119,019.08325.84125,080.00 125,080.00 6,060.92 95.15 % 603,338.8258,956.90690,674.00 690,674.00 87,335.18Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Total:87.36 % Department: 5010 - STREET MAINTENANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 147,757.7413,657.8355,000.00 55,000.00 -92,757.74 268.65 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 349,915.9557,357.27356,674.00 356,674.00 6,758.05 98.11 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 37,058.305,164.5744,500.00 44,500.00 7,441.70 83.28 % 750 - CAPITAL 558,759.540.001,400,000.00 1,400,000.00 841,240.46 39.91 % 1,093,491.5376,179.671,856,174.00 1,856,174.00 762,682.47Department: 5010 - STREET MAINTENANCE Total:58.91 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 100

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 3 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 7,762.501,620.000.00 0.00 -7,762.50 0.00 % 7,762.501,620.000.00 0.00 -7,762.50Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS Total:0.00 % Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS
701 - PERSONNEL 318,322.7235,148.60517,184.00 517,184.00 198,861.28 61.55 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 82,143.786,497.96256,152.00 256,152.00 174,008.22 32.07 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 17,532.11583.3025,800.00 25,800.00 8,267.89 67.95 % 750 - CAPITAL 352,621.2356,995.000.00 0.00 -352,621.23 0.00 % 770,619.8499,224.86799,136.00 799,136.00 28,516.16Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS Total:96.43 % Department: 7020 - VETERAN'S BUIDLING
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 29,976.55272.18122,114.00 122,114.00 92,137.45 24.55 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 82,500.000.00110,000.00 110,000.00 27,500.00 75.00 % 112,476.55272.18232,114.00 232,114.00 119,637.45Department: 7020 - VETERAN'S BUIDLING Total:48.46 % Department: 8000 - RECREATION
701 - PERSONNEL 620,671.3383,429.25877,852.00 877,852.00 257,180.67 70.70 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 223,293.2021,113.05333,429.00 333,429.00 110,135.80 66.97 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 38,193.4018,068.9541,100.00 41,100.00 2,906.60 92.93 % 750 - CAPITAL 96,921.773,563.02194,500.00 194,500.00 97,578.23 49.83 % 979,079.70126,174.271,446,881.00 1,446,881.00 467,801.30Department: 8000 - RECREATION Total:67.67 % Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
701 - PERSONNEL 1,176.331,045.6311,000.00 11,000.00 9,823.67 10.69 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 205,587.8516,710.06336,850.00 336,850.00 131,262.15 61.03 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 346,273.0090.00355,600.00 355,600.00 9,327.00 97.38 % 750 - CAPITAL 142,220.768,525.000.00 0.00 -142,220.76 0.00 % 695,257.9426,370.69703,450.00 703,450.00 8,192.06Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT Total:98.84 % Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
750 - CAPITAL 52.890.000.00 0.00 -52.89 0.00 %

52.890.000.00 0.00 -52.89Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 36,625,805.024,496,863.1539,686,067.00 39,850,993.00 3,225,187.98Fund: 101 - General Fund Total:91.91 % Fund: 105 - Measure "W"
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
764 - OTHER EXPENSES 2,881,870.910.009,000,300.00 9,000,300.00 6,118,429.09 32.02 % 2,881,870.910.009,000,300.00 9,000,300.00 6,118,429.09Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:32.02 % 2,881,870.910.009,000,300.00 9,000,300.00 6,118,429.09Fund: 105 - Measure "W" Total:32.02 % Fund: 200 - Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017
Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
750 - CAPITAL 82,914.27-7,964.780.00 0.00 -82,914.27 0.00 % 82,914.27-7,964.780.00 0.00 -82,914.27Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 82,914.27-7,964.780.00 0.00 -82,914.27Fund: 200 - Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017 Total:0.00 % Fund: 203 - Gas Tax
Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
740 - CONTRACTUAL 57,810.344,970.0070,000.00 70,000.00 12,189.66 82.59 % 57,810.344,970.0070,000.00 70,000.00 12,189.66Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:82.59 % Department: 5010 - STREET MAINTENANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 352,680.2954,591.83553,123.00 553,123.00 200,442.71 63.76 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 282,429.6627,681.86293,709.00 293,709.00 11,279.34 96.16 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 3,923.322,944.004,000.00 4,000.00 76.68 98.08 % 750 - CAPITAL 280,564.110.00283,140.00 283,140.00 2,575.89 99.09 % 919,597.3885,217.691,133,972.00 1,133,972.00 214,374.62Department: 5010 - STREET MAINTENANCE Total:81.10 % 977,407.7290,187.691,203,972.00 1,203,972.00 226,564.28Fund: 203 - Gas Tax Total:81.18 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 101

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 4 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
Fund: 205 - Park Dedication
Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 0.000.00323,496.00 323,496.00 323,496.00 0.00 %

0.000.00323,496.00 323,496.00 323,496.00Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS Total:0.00 % Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 3,075.970.00345,686.00 345,686.00 342,610.03 0.89 % 750 - CAPITAL 0.000.00245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.00 % 3,075.970.00590,686.00 590,686.00 587,610.03Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT Total:0.52 % 3,075.970.00914,182.00 914,182.00 911,106.03Fund: 205 - Park Dedication Total:0.34 % Fund: 206 - Local Transportation
Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 73,186.9432,103.850.00 110,477.00 37,290.06 66.25 % 73,186.9432,103.850.00 110,477.00 37,290.06Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:66.25 % 73,186.9432,103.850.00 110,477.00 37,290.06Fund: 206 - Local Transportation Total:66.25 % Fund: 213 - HOLLISTER AIRSHOW
Department: 4200 - AIRPORT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 21.9921.990.00 0.00 -21.99 0.00 %

21.9921.990.00 0.00 -21.99Department: 4200 - AIRPORT Total:0.00 %

21.9921.990.00 0.00 -21.99Fund: 213 - HOLLISTER AIRSHOW Total:0.00 % Fund: 216 - TRANSPORTATION DEV. ACT (COG)
Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
701 - PERSONNEL 864.170.0010,758.00 10,758.00 9,893.83 8.03 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,008,598.73127,579.960.00 0.00 -1,008,598.73 0.00 % 750 - CAPITAL 40,844.420.000.00 0.00 -40,844.42 0.00 %
1,050,307.32127,579.9610,758.00 10,758.00 -1,039,549.32Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:9,763.04 % Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
750 - CAPITAL 346,873.580.000.00 0.00 -346,873.58 0.00 % 346,873.580.000.00 0.00 -346,873.58Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 1,397,180.90127,579.9610,758.00 10,758.00 -1,386,422.90Fund: 216 - TRANSPORTATION DEV. ACT (COG) Total:12,987.37 % Fund: 217 - SPAY/NEUTER EDUCATION
Department: 2025 - ANIMAL CONTROL
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,684.160.007,000.00 7,000.00 5,315.84 24.06 % 1,684.160.007,000.00 7,000.00 5,315.84Department: 2025 - ANIMAL CONTROL Total:24.06 % 1,684.160.007,000.00 7,000.00 5,315.84Fund: 217 - SPAY/NEUTER EDUCATION Total:24.06 % Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 365.550.002,200.00 2,200.00 1,834.45 16.62 % 365.550.002,200.00 2,200.00 1,834.45Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:16.62 % Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 173,272.4025,488.53614,158.00 614,158.00 440,885.60 28.21 % 173,272.4025,488.53614,158.00 614,158.00 440,885.60Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT Total:28.21 % Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 189,495.5027,155.34635,842.00 635,842.00 446,346.50 29.80 % 189,495.5027,155.34635,842.00 635,842.00 446,346.50Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT Total:29.80 % 363,133.4552,643.871,252,200.00 1,252,200.00 889,066.55Fund: 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 Total:29.00 % Fund: 221 - POLICE S.L.E.S.F. PGM
Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT
750 - CAPITAL 0.000.00100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 %

0.000.00100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.00100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00Fund: 221 - POLICE S.L.E.S.F. PGM Total:0.00 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 102

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 5 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
Fund: 223 - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT
750 - CAPITAL 130,911.750.000.00 0.00 -130,911.75 0.00 % 130,911.750.000.00 0.00 -130,911.75Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 32,342.550.000.00 0.00 -32,342.55 0.00 % 750 - CAPITAL 1,696.040.000.00 0.00 -1,696.04 0.00 %
34,038.590.000.00 0.00 -34,038.59Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % 164,950.340.000.00 0.00 -164,950.34Fund: 223 - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY Total:0.00 % Fund: 226 - ANIMAL WELFARE FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.0040.00 40.00 40.00 0.00 %

0.000.0040.00 40.00 40.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 2025 - ANIMAL CONTROL
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES -350.000.000.00 0.00 350.00 0.00 % -350.000.000.00 0.00 350.00Department: 2025 - ANIMAL CONTROL Total:0.00 % -350.000.0040.00 40.00 390.00Fund: 226 - ANIMAL WELFARE FUND Total:-875.00 % Fund: 229 - 4TH OF JULY RALLY
Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,412.38138.860.00 0.00 -1,412.38 0.00 % 1,412.38138.860.00 0.00 -1,412.38Department: 2500 - POLICE DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % 1,412.38138.860.00 0.00 -1,412.38Fund: 229 - 4TH OF JULY RALLY Total:0.00 % Fund: 231 - SB 1186
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.00250.00 250.00 250.00 0.00 %

0.000.00250.00 250.00 250.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.00250.00 250.00 250.00Fund: 231 - SB 1186 Total:0.00 % Fund: 239 - PARKING FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 %

0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00Fund: 239 - PARKING FUND Total:0.00 % Fund: 246 - 2017 CDBG GRANT
Department: 4010 - Planning Division
701 - PERSONNEL 856.560.000.00 0.00 -856.56 0.00 %
740 - CONTRACTUAL 7,499.340.000.00 0.00 -7,499.34 0.00 % 8,355.900.000.00 0.00 -8,355.90Department: 4010 - Planning Division Total:0.00 % 8,355.900.000.00 0.00 -8,355.90Fund: 246 - 2017 CDBG GRANT Total:0.00 % Fund: 249 - FEMA-COVID-19
Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 518.000.000.00 0.00 -518.00 0.00 % 518.000.000.00 0.00 -518.00Department: 2205 - FIRE DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % 518.000.000.00 0.00 -518.00Fund: 249 - FEMA-COVID-19 Total:0.00 % Fund: 252 - 2020-cdbg-12015
Department: 4010 - Planning Division
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 14,311.900.000.00 0.00 -14,311.90 0.00 % 14,311.900.000.00 0.00 -14,311.90Department: 4010 - Planning Division Total:0.00 % 14,311.900.000.00 0.00 -14,311.90Fund: 252 - 2020-cdbg-12015 Total:0.00 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 103

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 6 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
Fund: 256 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 %

0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00Fund: 256 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUND Total:0.00 % Fund: 257 - SB 2 PLANNING GRANT
Department: 4010 - Planning Division
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 55,358.980.000.00 0.00 -55,358.98 0.00 % 55,358.980.000.00 0.00 -55,358.98Department: 4010 - Planning Division Total:0.00 % 55,358.980.000.00 0.00 -55,358.98Fund: 257 - SB 2 PLANNING GRANT Total:0.00 % Fund: 262 - SIGNAL IMPROV FEE ON FLYN
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.0050.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 %

0.000.0050.00 50.00 50.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.0050.00 50.00 50.00Fund: 262 - SIGNAL IMPROV FEE ON FLYN Total:0.00 % Fund: 264 - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.00200.00 200.00 200.00 0.00 %

0.000.00200.00 200.00 200.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.00200.00 200.00 200.00Fund: 264 - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES Total:0.00 % Fund: 273 - Prop 68
Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
750 - CAPITAL 3,771.493,771.490.00 0.00 -3,771.49 0.00 % 3,771.493,771.490.00 0.00 -3,771.49Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT Total:0.00 % 3,771.493,771.490.00 0.00 -3,771.49Fund: 273 - Prop 68 Total:0.00 % Fund: 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001
Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
701 - PERSONNEL 1,220.84871.520.00 0.00 -1,220.84 0.00 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 4,000.000.000.00 0.00 -4,000.00 0.00 % 5,220.84871.520.00 0.00 -5,220.84Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 5,220.84871.520.00 0.00 -5,220.84Fund: 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001 Total:0.00 % Fund: 301 - AB1600 CIP Fire Impact
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 %

0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00Fund: 301 - AB1600 CIP Fire Impact Total:0.00 % Fund: 302 - AB1600 CIP Police Impact
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 %

0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00Fund: 302 - AB1600 CIP Police Impact Total:0.00 % Fund: 303 - AB1600 CIP Storm Drain
Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 75,933.164,971.120.00 0.00 -75,933.16 0.00 % 75,933.164,971.120.00 0.00 -75,933.16Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:0.00 % 75,933.164,971.120.00 0.00 -75,933.16Fund: 303 - AB1600 CIP Storm Drain Total:0.00 % Fund: 304 - AB1600 CIP Traffic Impact
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.005,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 %

0.000.005,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 3,675,760.243,436,413.3180,000.00 80,000.00 -3,595,760.24 4,594.70 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 104

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 7 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
3,675,760.243,436,413.3180,000.00 80,000.00 -3,595,760.24Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:4,594.70 % Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
701 - PERSONNEL 832.340.000.00 0.00 -832.34 0.00 %
750 - CAPITAL 2,525,098.870.000.00 0.00 -2,525,098.87 0.00 % 2,525,931.210.000.00 0.00 -2,525,931.21Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 6,201,691.453,436,413.3185,000.00 85,000.00 -6,116,691.45Fund: 304 - AB1600 CIP Traffic Impact Total:7,296.11 % Fund: 305 - AB1600 CIP Santa Ana Storm Drain
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.002,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 %

0.000.002,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
750 - CAPITAL 22,320.006,315.000.00 0.00 -22,320.00 0.00 % 22,320.006,315.000.00 0.00 -22,320.00Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 22,320.006,315.002,500.00 2,500.00 -19,820.00Fund: 305 - AB1600 CIP Santa Ana Storm Drain Total:892.80 % Fund: 309 - Jail Juvenile Hall Fund
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.0090,500.00 90,500.00 90,500.00 0.00 %

0.000.0090,500.00 90,500.00 90,500.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.0090,500.00 90,500.00 90,500.00Fund: 309 - Jail Juvenile Hall Fund Total:0.00 % Fund: 312 - ARRA
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 420,000.00250,000.000.00 0.00 -420,000.00 0.00 % 420,000.00250,000.000.00 0.00 -420,000.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % 420,000.00250,000.000.00 0.00 -420,000.00Fund: 312 - ARRA Total:0.00 % Fund: 313 - City Hall/City Yard Impact Fees
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 %

0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00Fund: 313 - City Hall/City Yard Impact Fees Total:0.00 % Fund: 505 - VET'S BLDG COMM PAVERS
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
750 - CAPITAL 600.000.000.00 0.00 -600.00 0.00 %
600.000.000.00 0.00 -600.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % 600.000.000.00 0.00 -600.00Fund: 505 - VET'S BLDG COMM PAVERS Total:0.00 % Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 3,075.00393.754,250.00 4,250.00 1,175.00 72.35 % 764 - OTHER EXPENSES 0.000.0050,967.00 50,967.00 50,967.00 0.00 % 3,075.00393.7555,217.00 55,217.00 52,142.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:5.57 % Department: 1155 - FINANCE
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.005,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 %

0.000.005,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00Department: 1155 - FINANCE Total:0.00 % Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 6,602.163,939.857,850.00 7,850.00 1,247.84 84.10 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 42,523.782,840.4166,000.00 68,396.00 25,872.22 62.17 % 750 - CAPITAL 0.000.004,550.00 4,550.00 4,550.00 0.00 % 49,125.946,780.2678,400.00 80,796.00 31,670.06Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS Total:60.80 % Department: 4200 - AIRPORT
701 - PERSONNEL 381,372.6253,047.15510,266.00 510,266.00 128,893.38 74.74 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 476,622.4113,732.05310,384.00 310,384.00 -166,238.41 153.56 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 13,572.257,311.0026,350.00 26,350.00 12,777.75 51.51 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 105

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 8 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
750 - CAPITAL 0.000.00365,000.00 365,000.00 365,000.00 0.00 % 871,567.2874,090.201,212,000.00 1,212,000.00 340,432.72Department: 4200 - AIRPORT Total:71.91 % Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 5,980.200.004,200.00 4,200.00 -1,780.20 142.39 % 5,980.200.004,200.00 4,200.00 -1,780.20Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Total:142.39 % 929,748.4281,264.211,354,817.00 1,357,213.00 427,464.58Fund: 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND Total:68.50 % Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 6,499.356,499.350.00 0.00 -6,499.35 0.00 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 12,759.98219.1922,400.00 22,400.00 9,640.02 56.96 % 764 - OTHER EXPENSES 0.000.00252,162.00 252,162.00 252,162.00 0.00 % 19,259.336,718.54274,562.00 274,562.00 255,302.67Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:7.01 % Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER
701 - PERSONNEL 288.060.0026,497.00 26,497.00 26,208.94 1.09 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 0.000.0010,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 % 288.060.0036,497.00 36,497.00 36,208.94Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER Total:0.79 % Department: 1155 - FINANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 194,868.5419,328.59422,567.00 422,567.00 227,698.46 46.12 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 51,042.761,328.44127,590.00 127,590.00 76,547.24 40.01 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 97,699.873,810.5792,350.00 92,350.00 -5,349.87 105.79 % 343,611.1724,467.60642,507.00 642,507.00 298,895.83Department: 1155 - FINANCE Total:53.48 % Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS
701 - PERSONNEL 97,147.6613,371.30113,576.00 113,576.00 16,428.34 85.54 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 18,656.236,667.4320,097.00 20,097.00 1,440.77 92.83 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 72,040.314,806.84111,700.00 115,755.00 43,714.69 62.24 % 750 - CAPITAL 0.000.007,700.00 7,700.00 7,700.00 0.00 % 187,844.2024,845.57253,073.00 257,128.00 69,283.80Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS Total:73.05 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
701 - PERSONNEL 5,185.010.00148,218.00 148,218.00 143,032.99 3.50 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.0013,500.00 13,500.00 13,500.00 0.00 % 5,185.010.00161,718.00 161,718.00 156,532.99Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:3.21 % Department: 4300 - CODE ENFORCEMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 2,016.390.0010,370.00 10,370.00 8,353.61 19.44 % 2,016.390.0010,370.00 10,370.00 8,353.61Department: 4300 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Total:19.44 % Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 89,924.2013,772.51159,544.00 159,544.00 69,619.80 56.36 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 44,454.114,190.1944,049.00 44,049.00 -405.11 100.92 % 134,378.3117,962.70203,593.00 203,593.00 69,214.69Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Total:66.00 % Department: 5035 - WATER
701 - PERSONNEL 1,252,896.38183,068.211,698,248.00 1,698,248.00 445,351.62 73.78 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,136,804.13136,805.071,254,572.00 1,254,572.00 117,767.87 90.61 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 2,289,559.7041,631.403,484,200.00 3,484,200.00 1,194,640.30 65.71 % 750 - CAPITAL 100,451.465,732.6784,160.00 84,160.00 -16,291.46 119.36 % 4,779,711.67367,237.356,521,180.00 6,521,180.00 1,741,468.33Department: 5035 - WATER Total:73.30 % Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
750 - CAPITAL 40,983.080.000.00 0.00 -40,983.08 0.00 %
40,983.080.000.00 0.00 -40,983.08Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 5,513,277.22441,231.768,103,500.00 8,107,555.00 2,594,277.78Fund: 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND Total:68.00 % Fund: 621 - WATER EXPANSION ENT. FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.002,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 %

0.000.002,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER
701 - PERSONNEL 288.060.0029,233.00 29,233.00 28,944.94 0.99 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 106

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 9 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
288.060.0029,233.00 29,233.00 28,944.94Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER Total:0.99 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
701 - PERSONNEL 432.080.00435.00 435.00 2.92 99.33 %
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 298,197.134,548.360.00 0.00 -298,197.13 0.00 % 298,629.214,548.36435.00 435.00 -298,194.21Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:68,650.39 % 298,917.274,548.3632,168.00 32,168.00 -266,749.27Fund: 621 - WATER EXPANSION ENT. FUND Total:929.24 % Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 23,501.306,501.300.00 0.00 -23,501.30 0.00 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 130,713.0314,616.194,800,450.00 4,800,450.00 4,669,736.97 2.72 % 764 - OTHER EXPENSES 0.000.00392,909.00 392,909.00 392,909.00 0.00 % 154,214.3321,117.495,193,359.00 5,193,359.00 5,039,144.67Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:2.97 % Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER
701 - PERSONNEL 288.060.0026,623.00 26,623.00 26,334.94 1.08 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 0.000.0010,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 % 288.060.0036,623.00 36,623.00 36,334.94Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER Total:0.79 % Department: 1155 - FINANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 195,689.0919,436.58428,067.00 428,067.00 232,377.91 45.71 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 19,612.261,380.2852,033.00 52,033.00 32,420.74 37.69 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 105,645.793,810.5784,850.00 84,850.00 -20,795.79 124.51 % 320,947.1424,627.43564,950.00 564,950.00 244,002.86Department: 1155 - FINANCE Total:56.81 % Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS
701 - PERSONNEL 97,139.9113,370.58113,576.00 113,576.00 16,436.09 85.53 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 11,172.946,667.4413,300.00 13,300.00 2,127.06 84.01 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 86,402.157,998.36130,900.00 134,955.00 48,552.85 64.02 % 750 - CAPITAL 0.000.007,700.00 7,700.00 7,700.00 0.00 % 194,715.0028,036.38265,476.00 269,531.00 74,816.00Department: 1157 - INFORMATION SYSTEMS Total:72.24 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
701 - PERSONNEL 5,185.010.00148,218.00 148,218.00 143,032.99 3.50 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 58,452.5014,172.504,078.00 4,078.00 -54,374.50 1,433.36 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.0015,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 % 63,637.5114,172.50167,296.00 167,296.00 103,658.49Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:38.04 % Department: 4300 - CODE ENFORCEMENT
701 - PERSONNEL 2,016.390.0010,370.00 10,370.00 8,353.61 19.44 % 2,016.390.0010,370.00 10,370.00 8,353.61Department: 4300 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Total:19.44 % Department: 4990 - SEWER DOMESTIC
701 - PERSONNEL 13,836.37154.3912,473.00 12,473.00 -1,363.37 110.93 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 2,577,348.95776,939.621,806,038.00 1,806,038.00 -771,310.95 142.71 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 1,044,587.69118,850.181,665,000.00 1,665,000.00 620,412.31 62.74 % 750 - CAPITAL 202,324.230.001,014,964.00 1,014,964.00 812,639.77 19.93 % 3,838,097.24895,944.194,498,475.00 4,498,475.00 660,377.76Department: 4990 - SEWER DOMESTIC Total:85.32 % Department: 4991 - SEWER INDUSTRIAL
701 - PERSONNEL 0.000.004,600.00 4,600.00 4,600.00 0.00 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 31,103.61140.41147,018.00 147,018.00 115,914.39 21.16 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 204,558.2725,806.81324,000.00 324,000.00 119,441.73 63.14 % 235,661.8825,947.22475,618.00 475,618.00 239,956.12Department: 4991 - SEWER INDUSTRIAL Total:49.55 % Department: 4995 - SEWER COLLECTION
701 - PERSONNEL 1,042,200.78125,279.831,572,415.00 1,572,415.00 530,214.22 66.28 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 704,732.8567,344.76509,737.00 509,737.00 -194,995.85 138.25 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 42,926.464,550.7279,300.00 79,300.00 36,373.54 54.13 % 750 - CAPITAL 74,335.565,907.66118,464.00 118,464.00 44,128.44 62.75 % 1,864,195.65203,082.972,279,916.00 2,279,916.00 415,720.35Department: 4995 - SEWER COLLECTION Total:81.77 % Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 89,924.2013,772.60254,474.00 254,474.00 164,549.80 35.34 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 107

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 10 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 52,178.756,297.2749,768.00 49,768.00 -2,410.75 104.84 % 142,102.9520,069.87304,242.00 304,242.00 162,139.05Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Total:46.71 % Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS
701 - PERSONNEL 239,616.6220,972.65300,272.00 300,272.00 60,655.38 79.80 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 35,869.36221.09155,209.00 155,209.00 119,339.64 23.11 % 275,485.9821,193.74455,481.00 455,481.00 179,995.02Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS Total:60.48 % Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 30,941.121,885.0956,650.00 56,650.00 25,708.88 54.62 % 30,941.121,885.0956,650.00 56,650.00 25,708.88Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT Total:54.62 % Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
750 - CAPITAL 539,086.880.000.00 0.00 -539,086.88 0.00 % 539,086.880.000.00 0.00 -539,086.88Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 7,661,390.131,256,076.8814,308,456.00 14,312,511.00 6,651,120.87Fund: 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND Total:53.53 % Fund: 661 - SEWER EXPANSION ENTPRS
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.002,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 %

0.000.002,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER
701 - PERSONNEL 288.060.0026,623.00 26,623.00 26,334.94 1.08 % 288.060.0026,623.00 26,623.00 26,334.94Department: 1120 - CITY MANAGER Total:1.08 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 251,472.8819,404.940.00 0.00 -251,472.88 0.00 % 251,472.8819,404.940.00 0.00 -251,472.88Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:0.00 % 251,760.9419,404.9429,123.00 29,123.00 -222,637.94Fund: 661 - SEWER EXPANSION ENTPRS Total:864.47 % Fund: 662 - STORM DRAIN
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.002,418.00 2,418.00 2,418.00 0.00 %

0.000.002,418.00 2,418.00 2,418.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
701 - PERSONNEL 0.000.00138,402.00 138,402.00 138,402.00 0.00 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 2,993.320.0079,719.00 79,719.00 76,725.68 3.75 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.0015,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 % 2,993.320.00233,121.00 233,121.00 230,127.68Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:1.28 % Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 121,193.9215,810.79205,180.00 205,180.00 83,986.08 59.07 % 121,193.9215,810.79205,180.00 205,180.00 83,986.08Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS Total:59.07 % Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
750 - CAPITAL 1,134,788.3312,287.280.00 0.00 -1,134,788.33 0.00 % 1,134,788.3312,287.280.00 0.00 -1,134,788.33Department: 9000 - CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Total:0.00 % 1,258,975.5728,098.07440,719.00 440,719.00 -818,256.57Fund: 662 - STORM DRAIN Total:285.66 % Fund: 665 - SEWER IND. ENTERPRISE
Department: 4991 - SEWER INDUSTRIAL
701 - PERSONNEL 2,160.420.000.00 0.00 -2,160.42 0.00 %
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 297,050.902,991.410.00 0.00 -297,050.90 0.00 % 299,211.322,991.410.00 0.00 -299,211.32Department: 4991 - SEWER INDUSTRIAL Total:0.00 % 299,211.322,991.410.00 0.00 -299,211.32Fund: 665 - SEWER IND. ENTERPRISE Total:0.00 % Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
764 - OTHER EXPENSES 0.000.0037,149.00 37,149.00 37,149.00 0.00 %

0.000.0037,149.00 37,149.00 37,149.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 108

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 11 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
Department: 1155 - FINANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 1,296.250.001,305.00 1,305.00 8.75 99.33 % 1,296.250.001,305.00 1,305.00 8.75Department: 1155 - FINANCE Total:99.33 % Department: 4995 - SEWER COLLECTION
701 - PERSONNEL 26.740.000.00 0.00 -26.74 0.00 %

26.740.000.00 0.00 -26.74Department: 4995 - SEWER COLLECTION Total:0.00 % Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 73,377.939,974.323,336.00 3,336.00 -70,041.93 2,199.58 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 94,605.962,050.9478,345.00 78,345.00 -16,260.96 120.76 % 167,983.8912,025.2681,681.00 81,681.00 -86,302.89Department: 5005 - VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Total:205.66 % Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS
701 - PERSONNEL 516,037.9276,290.25654,960.00 654,960.00 138,922.08 78.79 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 73,057.847,045.3372,000.00 72,000.00 -1,057.84 101.47 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 1,833.340.00300.00 300.00 -1,533.34 611.11 % 750 - CAPITAL 2,333.20291.6569,949.00 69,949.00 67,615.80 3.34 % 593,262.3083,627.23797,209.00 797,209.00 203,946.70Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS Total:74.42 % 762,569.1895,652.49917,344.00 917,344.00 154,774.82Fund: 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND Total:83.13 % Fund: 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 3,427.60438.905,500.00 5,500.00 2,072.40 62.32 % 3,427.60438.905,500.00 5,500.00 2,072.40Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:62.32 % Department: 7010 - BRIGG'S BUILDING
701 - PERSONNEL 1,992.77174.273,385.00 3,385.00 1,392.23 58.87 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 111,592.782,989.4269,623.00 69,623.00 -41,969.78 160.28 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 38,163.334,289.0721,500.00 21,500.00 -16,663.33 177.50 % 151,748.887,452.7694,508.00 94,508.00 -57,240.88Department: 7010 - BRIGG'S BUILDING Total:160.57 % 155,176.487,891.66100,008.00 100,008.00 -55,168.48Fund: 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND Total:155.16 % Fund: 704 - MERIDIAN ST DIST 1991-2
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 2,250.000.000.00 0.00 -2,250.00 0.00 % 2,250.000.000.00 0.00 -2,250.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % 2,250.000.000.00 0.00 -2,250.00Fund: 704 - MERIDIAN ST DIST 1991-2 Total:0.00 % Fund: 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 7,127.800.000.00 0.00 -7,127.80 0.00 % 7,127.800.000.00 0.00 -7,127.80Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 230.260.00209.00 209.00 -21.26 110.17 % 230.260.00209.00 209.00 -21.26Department: 4000 - ENGINEERING Total:110.17 % Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 3,580.360.000.00 0.00 -3,580.36 0.00 % 3,580.360.000.00 0.00 -3,580.36Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS Total:0.00 % Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS
701 - PERSONNEL 23,139.971,519.28118,627.00 118,627.00 95,487.03 19.51 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 101,334.866,746.5535,842.00 35,842.00 -65,492.86 282.73 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.00600.00 600.00 600.00 0.00 %
124,474.838,265.83155,069.00 155,069.00 30,594.17Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS Total:80.27 % Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 177,495.1416,368.2298,600.00 98,600.00 -78,895.14 180.02 % 177,495.1416,368.2298,600.00 98,600.00 -78,895.14Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT Total:180.02 % 312,908.3924,634.05253,878.00 253,878.00 -59,030.39Fund: 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST Total:123.25 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 109

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 12 of 13
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Period
ActivityCategor…
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
Fund: 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL -10,530.270.001,150.00 1,150.00 11,680.27 -915.68 % -10,530.270.001,150.00 1,150.00 11,680.27Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:-915.68 % Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 44,940.267,783.000.00 0.00 -44,940.26 0.00 % 44,940.267,783.000.00 0.00 -44,940.26Department: 5015 - STORM DRAIN OPERATIONS Total:0.00 % Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS
701 - PERSONNEL 16,073.423,136.000.00 0.00 -16,073.42 0.00 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 8,810.54752.56218,000.00 218,000.00 209,189.46 4.04 % 24,883.963,888.56218,000.00 218,000.00 193,116.04Department: 7000 - BUILDINGS, GROUNDS, & PARKS Total:11.41 % Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
701 - PERSONNEL 0.000.006,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 185,721.0130,482.06198,350.00 198,350.00 12,628.99 93.63 % 185,721.0130,482.06204,350.00 204,350.00 18,628.99Department: 8050 - PARKS & RECREATION DEPT Total:90.88 % 245,014.9642,153.62423,500.00 423,500.00 178,485.04Fund: 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES Total:57.85 % Fund: 713 - CFD #5 - PUBLIC SAFETY (FIRE & POLICE)
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 57.600.00530.00 530.00 472.40 10.87 %

57.600.00530.00 530.00 472.40Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:10.87 %

57.600.00530.00 530.00 472.40Fund: 713 - CFD #5 - PUBLIC SAFETY (FIRE & POLICE) Total:10.87 % Fund: 809 - HOME PROG. REVOLV. LOANS
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.001,250.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 %

0.000.001,250.00 1,250.00 1,250.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 %

0.000.001,250.00 1,250.00 1,250.00Fund: 809 - HOME PROG. REVOLV. LOANS Total:0.00 % Fund: 850 - SUCESSOR AGENCY
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
740 - CONTRACTUAL 5,720.000.000.00 0.00 -5,720.00 0.00 % 5,720.000.000.00 0.00 -5,720.00Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:0.00 % Department: 1125 - RDA GENERAL
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 1,260.000.000.00 0.00 -1,260.00 0.00 % 1,260.000.000.00 0.00 -1,260.00Department: 1125 - RDA GENERAL Total:0.00 % 6,980.000.000.00 0.00 -6,980.00Fund: 850 - SUCESSOR AGENCY Total:0.00 % Fund: 851 - HOUSING
Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT
735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 5,336.130.007,500.00 7,500.00 2,163.87 71.15 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 0.000.001,250.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 % 5,336.130.008,750.00 8,750.00 3,413.87Department: 1100 - NON DEPARTMENT Total:60.98 % Department: 1125 - RDA GENERAL
740 - CONTRACTUAL 840.000.000.00 0.00 -840.00 0.00 %
840.000.000.00 0.00 -840.00Department: 1125 - RDA GENERAL Total:0.00 % Department: 1135 - Affordable Housing
701 - PERSONNEL 97,210.6812,859.38158,552.00 158,552.00 61,341.32 61.31 % 735 - SERVICES & SUPPLIES 7,064.332,513.8721,650.00 21,650.00 14,585.67 32.63 % 740 - CONTRACTUAL 770.8098.701,600.00 1,600.00 829.20 48.18 % 105,045.8115,471.95181,802.00 181,802.00 76,756.19Department: 1135 - Affordable Housing Total:57.78 % Department: 1155 - FINANCE
701 - PERSONNEL 16,280.522,153.3921,758.00 21,758.00 5,477.48 74.83 % 16,280.522,153.3921,758.00 21,758.00 5,477.48Department: 1155 - FINANCE Total:74.83 % 127,502.4617,625.34212,310.00 212,310.00 84,807.54Fund: 851 - HOUSING Total:60.05 % Report Total:10,515,489.82 67,206,115.7178,534,622.00 78,820,531.00 11,614,415.29 85.26 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 110

Budget Report For Fiscal: 2022-2023 Period Ending: 03/31/2023 4/3/2023 11:19:24 AM Page 13 of 13
Fund Summary
Fiscal
Activity
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)Fund
Period
Activity
Current
Total Budget
Original
Total Budget
Percent
Used
101 - General Fund 36,625,805.024,496,863.1539,686,067.00 39,850,993.00 3,225,187.98 91.91 % 105 - Measure "W"2,881,870.910.009,000,300.00 9,000,300.00 6,118,429.09 32.02 % 200 - Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017 82,914.27-7,964.780.00 0.00 -82,914.27 0.00 % 203 - Gas Tax 977,407.7290,187.691,203,972.00 1,203,972.00 226,564.28 81.18 % 205 - Park Dedication 3,075.970.00914,182.00 914,182.00 911,106.03 0.34 % 206 - Local Transportation 73,186.9432,103.850.00 110,477.00 37,290.06 66.25 % 213 - HOLLISTER AIRSHOW 21.9921.990.00 0.00 -21.99 0.00 % 216 - TRANSPORTATION DEV. ACT (COG)1,397,180.90127,579.9610,758.00 10,758.00 -1,386,422.90 12,987.37 % 217 - SPAY/NEUTER EDUCATION 1,684.160.007,000.00 7,000.00 5,315.84 24.06 % 218 - MELLO ROOS CFD-1 363,133.4552,643.871,252,200.00 1,252,200.00 889,066.55 29.00 % 221 - POLICE S.L.E.S.F. PGM 0.000.00100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 % 223 - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 164,950.340.000.00 0.00 -164,950.34 0.00 % 226 - ANIMAL WELFARE FUND -350.000.0040.00 40.00 390.00 -875.00 % 229 - 4TH OF JULY RALLY 1,412.38138.860.00 0.00 -1,412.38 0.00 % 231 - SB 1186 0.000.00250.00 250.00 250.00 0.00 %
239 - PARKING FUND 0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 %
246 - 2017 CDBG GRANT 8,355.900.000.00 0.00 -8,355.90 0.00 % 249 - FEMA-COVID-19 518.000.000.00 0.00 -518.00 0.00 %
252 - 2020-cdbg-12015 14,311.900.000.00 0.00 -14,311.90 0.00 % 256 - AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUND 0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 % 257 - SB 2 PLANNING GRANT 55,358.980.000.00 0.00 -55,358.98 0.00 % 262 - SIGNAL IMPROV FEE ON FLYN 0.000.0050.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 % 264 - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES 0.000.00200.00 200.00 200.00 0.00 % 273 - Prop 68 3,771.493,771.490.00 0.00 -3,771.49 0.00 % 275 - 2021-CDBG-NH-2001 5,220.84871.520.00 0.00 -5,220.84 0.00 % 301 - AB1600 CIP Fire Impact 0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 % 302 - AB1600 CIP Police Impact 0.000.001,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 % 303 - AB1600 CIP Storm Drain 75,933.164,971.120.00 0.00 -75,933.16 0.00 % 304 - AB1600 CIP Traffic Impact 6,201,691.453,436,413.3185,000.00 85,000.00 -6,116,691.45 7,296.11 % 305 - AB1600 CIP Santa Ana Storm Drain 22,320.006,315.002,500.00 2,500.00 -19,820.00 892.80 % 309 - Jail Juvenile Hall Fund 0.000.0090,500.00 90,500.00 90,500.00 0.00 % 312 - ARRA 420,000.00250,000.000.00 0.00 -420,000.00 0.00 % 313 - City Hall/City Yard Impact Fees 0.000.00500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 % 505 - VET'S BLDG COMM PAVERS 600.000.000.00 0.00 -600.00 0.00 % 601 - AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND 929,748.4281,264.211,354,817.00 1,357,213.00 427,464.58 68.50 % 620 - WATER ENTERPRISE FUND 5,513,277.22441,231.768,103,500.00 8,107,555.00 2,594,277.78 68.00 % 621 - WATER EXPANSION ENT. FUND 298,917.274,548.3632,168.00 32,168.00 -266,749.27 929.24 % 660 - SEWER ENTRPRISE FUND 7,661,390.131,256,076.8814,308,456.00 14,312,511.00 6,651,120.87 53.53 % 661 - SEWER EXPANSION ENTPRS 251,760.9419,404.9429,123.00 29,123.00 -222,637.94 864.47 % 662 - STORM DRAIN 1,258,975.5728,098.07440,719.00 440,719.00 -818,256.57 285.66 % 665 - SEWER IND. ENTERPRISE 299,211.322,991.410.00 0.00 -299,211.32 0.00 % 670 - STREET SWEEPING FUND 762,569.1895,652.49917,344.00 917,344.00 154,774.82 83.13 % 680 - BRIGGS BLDG ENTPR FUND 155,176.487,891.66100,008.00 100,008.00 -55,168.48 155.16 % 704 - MERIDIAN ST DIST 1991-2 2,250.000.000.00 0.00 -2,250.00 0.00 % 709 - LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DIST 312,908.3924,634.05253,878.00 253,878.00 -59,030.39 123.25 % 712 - CFD#4 PUBLIC FACILITIES 245,014.9642,153.62423,500.00 423,500.00 178,485.04 57.85 % 713 - CFD #5 - PUBLIC SAFETY (FIRE & POLICE)57.600.00530.00 530.00 472.40 10.87 % 809 - HOME PROG. REVOLV. LOANS 0.000.001,250.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 0.00 % 850 - SUCESSOR AGENCY 6,980.000.000.00 0.00 -6,980.00 0.00 % 851 - HOUSING 127,502.4617,625.34212,310.00 212,310.00 84,807.54 60.05 % Report Total:10,515,489.82 67,206,115.7178,534,622.00 78,820,531.00 11,614,415.29 85.26 % A.2.h
Packet Pg. 111

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 19, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY - FILED BY DANA & LARRY LOPEZ

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Dana & Larry Lopez filed a claim against the City on April 12, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of this claim and seeks authorization to send the notice of rejection to the claimant.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Dana & Larry Lopez filed a claim against the City on April 12, 2023. Staff sent a copy of this claim to the City’s risk manager/claims adjuster, who recommended denial of the claim. Staff further requests authorization to send the notice of rejection of claim to the claimant.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Unknown

CEQA: Exempt

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 20230412_Dana & Larry Lopez_Redacted

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.3
Packet Pg. 112

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 113

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 114

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 115

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 116

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 117

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 118

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 119

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 120

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 121

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 122

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 123

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 124

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 125

A.3.a
Packet Pg. 126

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 14, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-67, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING THE TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF

VARIOUS STREETS FOR THE ANNUAL PORTUGUESE HERITAGE FESTIVAL PARADE, MAY 28,2023

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This resolution authorizes the temporary closure of various streets for the Annual Portuguese Heritage Festival Parade on May 28, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the temporary closure of various streets for the Annual Portuguese Heritage Festival Parade on May 28, 2023.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: The City Clerk’s Office received a request for the temporary closure of various streets from the S.D.E.S. Portuguese Lodge for their annual Portuguese Festival and Parade. They are requesting the following streets to be closed on May 28, 2023, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.: 7th Street from College Street to San Benito Street, San Benito Street from 5th Street to 7th Street, 5th Street from San Benito Street to College Street, and College Street from 5th Street to 7th Street, for a parade beginning and ending at the S.D.E.S Hall on Seventh Street and ending at the Sacred Heart Church on College Street, on May 28, 2023. The certificate of insurance, hold harmless agreement, and street closure permit have been submitted to the City Clerk’s Office (Attached). This event is sponsored by the S.D.E.S. Portuguese Heritage Association.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Staff time, set up and take down.

CEQA: N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

1. SDES Portuguese Festival Parade Public Assembly Permit_Redacted

2. SDES Portuguese Festival Parade Block Party Permit_Redacted

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.4
Packet Pg. 127

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-67

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING THE

TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF VARIOUS STREETS FOR THE ANNUAL PORTUGUESE HERITAGE FESTIVAL PARADE, MAY 28,2023

WHEREAS, the S.D.E.S. Portuguese Heritage Association is having their annual Festival Parade on Sunday, May 28, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the Police Department of the City of Hollister has deemed street closure appropriate for Public Safety issues.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hollister authorizes the following street closures on May 28, 2023, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. to ensure Public Safety:

Closure of 7th Street from College Street to San Benito Street; and

Closure of San Benito Street from 7th Street to 5th Street; and

Closure of 5th Street from San Benito Street to College Street; and

Closure of College Street from 5th Street to 7th Street.

Said streets will be temporarily closed pursuant to Section 21101(e) of the Vehicle Cod e of the State of California. The City Council of the City of Hollister finds and determines that said closing is necessary for the safety of persons.

Public Works will be responsible for traffic control, including re-routing of traffic.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Hollister at a Regular Meeting held this 1st day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lozano Smith Attorneys at Law

Mary F. Lerner, City Attorney

A.4
Packet Pg. 128

I, JENNIFER WOODWORTH, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hollister, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2023-67, is an original Resolution, or true and correct copy of a City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Hollister at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of May, 2023, at which meeting a quorum was present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hollister this City Council day of May, 2023.

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC

City Clerk of the City of Hollister
A.4
Packet Pg. 129

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 130

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 131

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 132

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 133

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 134

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 135

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 136

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 137

A.4.a
Packet Pg. 138

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 139

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 140

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 141

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 142

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 143

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 144

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 145

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 146

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 147

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 148

A.4.b
Packet Pg. 149

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: March 31, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

Recreation
Tina Garza, Recreation Services
Manager

TITLE OF ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-68, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES OF VARIOUS

STREETS FOR THE CITY OF HOLLISTER RECREATION DEPARTMENT, IN

PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SAN BENITO COUNTY SAFE KIDS COALITION'S ANNUAL KIDS AT THE PARK EVENT ON JUNE 14, 2023 FROM 7:30 A.M. TO 2:30 P.M.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This resolution will authorize the temporary closures of 7th Street between West and Powell Street and West Street between 6th and 7th Street for the Annual Kids at the Park event to be held on Wednesday, June 14, 2023.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving the temporary street closures of 7th Street between West and Powell Street and West Street between 6th and 7th Street for the Annual Kids at the Park event to be held on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, for the Annual Kids at the Park event.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: The City of Hollister Parks and Recreation Department, in partnership with the San Benito County Safe Kids Coalition, requests temporary street closure of 7th Street from Powell Street to West Street and West Street from 6th Street to 7th Street from 7:30 a.m. to 2:30 pm on Wednesday, June 14, 2023. The request for the temporary street closure is for the annual Kids at the Park event.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Staff time, set up, and take down.

CEQA: N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2023-06-14 Kids at the Park_ Public Assembly Application

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.5
Packet Pg. 150

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-68

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING

TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES OF VARIOUS STREETS FOR THE CITY OF

HOLLISTER RECREATION DEPARTMENT, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SAN BENITO COUNTY SAFE KIDS COALITION'S ANNUAL KIDS AT THE PARK EVENT ON JUNE 14, 2023 FROM 7:30 A.M. TO 2:30 P.M.

WHEREAS, the City of Hollister Parks and Recreation Department, in partnership with the Safe Kids Coalition, will be having the Annual Kids at the Park event on Wednesday, June 14, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City of Hollister Police Department has deemed street closures appropriate for Public Safety reasons.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hollister approves that temporary street closures pursuant to the following will ensure public safety:

Closure of 7th Street from Powell Street to West Street from 7:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

Closure of West Street from 7th Street to 6th Street from 7:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

Said streets will be temporarily closed pursuant to Section 21101(e) of the Vehicle Code of the State of California. The City Council of the City of Hollister determines that said closing is necessary for the safety of persons and that Powell Street, South Street, and 6th Street will be used during the temporary closure.

The Police Department of the City of Hollister will be responsible for traffic control, including re- routing.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Hollister at a Regular Meeting held this 1st day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lozano Smith Attorneys at Law

Mary F. Lerner, City Attorney

A.5
Packet Pg. 151

I, JENNIFER WOODWORTH, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hollister, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2023-68, is an original Resolution, or true and correct copy of a City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Hollister at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of May, 2023, at which meeting a quorum was present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hollister this City Council day of May, 2023.

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC

City Clerk of the City of Hollister
A.5
Packet Pg. 152

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 153

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 154

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 155

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 156

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 157

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 158

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 159

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 160

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 161

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 162

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 163

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 164

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 165

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 166

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 167

A.5.a
Packet Pg. 168

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 20, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: RATIFY APPOINTMENT TO PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The Parks & Recreation Commission currently has a vacancy for District 4. Staff requests the City Council ratify the appointment of Julio Rodriguez to fill the commission vacancy.

RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the appointment of Julio Rodriguez to fill the vacancy for the Parks & Recreation Commission District 4 seat.

On March 28, 2023, the Parks & Recreation Commission incumbent for District 4, Aaliyah Gomez, resigned from her position on the commission. The City Clerk received one application for the position from Julio Rodriguez.

Staff recommends that the Council ratify appointment of Julio Rodriguez to the District 4 seat on the Parks & Recreation Commission, for a term concurrent with the District 4 Councilmember’s term.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: None

CEQA: N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Julio Rodriguez_Parks & Recreation_D4_Redacted

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.6
Packet Pg. 169

A.6.a
Packet Pg. 170

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-69, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HOLLISTER AUTHORIZING THE DISPLAY OF THE DEFERRED ACTION FOR CHILDHOOD ARRIVALS (DACA) FLAG MAY 4 - MAY 7, 2023 AT CITY HALL

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: At the March 6, 2023 Council meeting, students requested to display the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag at City Hall for a future date. By consensus, a majority of the City Council approved the request and directed staff to return once the dates had been set.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the display of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag May 4, 2023 through May 7, 2023, at City Hall.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: At the March 6, 2023 Council meeting, Hollister High School students requested to display the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag at City Hall for a future date. By consensus, a majority of the City Council approved the request and directed staff to return once the dates had been set. The students have requested to fly the DACA flag during the Cinco de Mayo weekend, May 4, 2023 through May 7, 2023.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Unknown – Cost of employee to attach flag.

CEQA: N/A

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.7
Packet Pg. 171

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-69

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER AUTHORIZING THE DISPLAY OF THE DEFERRED ACTION FOR CHILDHOOD ARRIVALS (DACA) FLAG MAY 4 - MAY 7, 2023 AT CITY HALL

WHEREAS, on March 6, 2023 the City Council of the City of Hollister received a request from Hollister High School students to display the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag at City Hall; and

WHEREAS, the City Council by consensus approved the request to fly the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag at the Hollister City Hall; and

WHEREAS, the City’s flagpoles are not intended to be a forum for free expression by the public.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hollister hereby authorizes the display of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) flag on the City flagpole located in front of City Hall May 4, 2023 through May 7, 2023.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Hollister at a Regular Meeting held this 1st day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lozano Smith Attorneys at Law

Mary F. Lerner, City Attorney

A.7
Packet Pg. 172

I, JENNIFER WOODWORTH, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hollister, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2023-69, is an original Resolution, or true and correct copy of a City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Hollister at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of May, 2023, at which meeting a quorum was present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hollister this City Council day of May, 2023.

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC

City Clerk of the City of Hollister
A.7
Packet Pg. 173

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 11, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: LETTER OF SUPPORT - SENATE BILL 524 (CABALLERO): TEST AND TREAT

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Senator Caballero’s office recently contacted City staff to request letters of support for three bills to improve healthcare accessibility in rural California and reduce financial strains on hospitals.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve a letter of support for SB 524 (Caballero): Test and Treat to be sent to the Senate Committee on Business, Professions, and Economic Development.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: California State Senator Anna Caballero recently sponsored SB 524, which would allow pharmacists to prescribe treatment for certain common conditions for which pharmacists can currently perform tests. These conditions include COVID-19, influenza, sexually transmitted infections, strep throat, and conjunctivitis. With nearly nine in 10 Californians living within five miles of a community pharmacy, the role of the pharmacist in orchestrating a patient’s care is an underused resource. For many patients, community pharmacies are their primary access point for health care. Pharmacists are rigorously trained to provide treatments to patients.

Getting tested and treated directly by a pharmacy may often be the fastest way for an individual to get treatment, and stop the spread of illness. SB 524 provides increased access and protects the health of thousands of Californians, especially in rural parts of the state.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A

CEQA: N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

1. SB 524 Letter of Support

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.8
Packet Pg. 174

CITY OF HOLLISTER

375 FIFTH ● HOLLISTER, CA 95023-3876

May 1, 2023

The Honorable Richard D. Roth, Chair
Senate Committee on Business, Professions, and Economic Development 1021 O Street, Suite 3320
Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: Senate Bill 524 (Caballero): Test and Treat: Support

Dear Chairperson Roth,
On behalf of the City of Hollister, I am pleased to offer our strong support of SB 524, which gives pharmacists authority to provide direct treatment for patients following certain positive test results.

Hollister is a city in and the county seat of San Benito County. The population reported in the 2020 census was 41,678 residents, and Hollister is primarily an agricultural town. The City of Hollister strives to ensure the welfare of its residents, forming strong alliances and partnerships with healthcare providers.

Healthcare is inaccessible for many Californians, especially in rural California. Rural residents are confronted by many obstacles, including a shortage of physicians and other providers, lack of transportation, hospital closures, and limited access to treatments for various viral illnesses.

Many rural Californians may face expensive emergency room visits and long wait times in order to be treated for diseases like COVID-19 or the flu. Furthermore, the average drive time to a hospital in rural communities is often too far for patients in urgent need of care.

Millions of Californians benefit from receiving testing, vaccines and treatment from pharmacies.

Recognizing the essential role of pharmacies in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) gave pharmacists the authority to prescribe a COVID- 19 treatment, Paxlovid, directly to patients. When this authority expires, pharmacists’ ability to independently provide treatment to patients will end.

SB 409 (Caballero, Chapter 604, 2021) gave pharmacists authority to perform several FDA- approved or authorized tests. This allows pharmacists to screen for COVID-19 and several other common illnesses. Pharmacists cannot currently prescribe treatment for many of these common health care conditions for which they are able to perform testing, which limits access to treatment for Californians
SB 524 allows pharmacists to prescribe treatment for certain common conditions for which pharmacists can currently perform tests. These conditions include COVID-19, influenza, sexually transmitted infections, strep throat, and conjunctivitis. With nearly nine in 10 A.8.a
Packet Pg. 175

Californians living within five miles of a community pharmacy, the role of the pharmacist in orchestrating a patient’s care is an underused resource. For many patients, community pharmacies are their primary access point for health care. Pharmacists are rigorously trained to provide treatments to patients. Getting tested and treated directly by a pharmacy may often be the fastest way for an individual to get treatment, and stop the spread of illness. This bill provides increased access and protects the health of thousands of Californians, especially in rural parts of the state.

For these reasons and that SB524 (Caballero) would further the City of Hollister’s goal of ensuring its residents have access to necessary care and promote a healthy community, we are proud to support SB 524 (Caballero) and encourage your “aye” vote when it is heard in your committee.

Best regards,

Mia Casey, Mayor
City of Hollister
A.8.a
Packet Pg. 176

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 11, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: LETTER OF SUPPORT - SENATE BILL 621 (CABALLERO): HEALTH CARE COVERAGE: BIOSIMILAR DRUGS

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Senator Caballero’s office recently contacted City staff to request letters of support for three bills to improve healthcare accessibility in rural California and reduce financial strains on hospitals.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve a letter of support for SB 621 (Caballero): Health care coverage: biosimilar drugs to be sent to the Senate Committee on Health.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: California State Senator Anna Caballero recently sponsored SB 621, which would allow health plans to have the tools to directly access a lower-cost biosimilar drug before the equivalent brand drug. This bill also extends relevant patient protections to the usage of biosimilars, such as the ability of a provider to request that the original brand treatment be utilized. A prescriber in California will have to approve the use of a biosimilar prior to it being administered to a patient.

Ultimately, SB 621 would give patients greater access to treatments for diseases such as arthritis and diabetes, by helping patients access lower-cost and equally effective alternatives to expensive brand named prescription drugs.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A

CEQA: N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

1. SB 621 Letter of Support

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.9
Packet Pg. 177

CITY OF HOLLISTER

375 FIFTH ● HOLLISTER, CA 95023-3876

May 1, 2023

The Honorable Susan Eggman, Chair
Senate Committee on Health
1021 O Street, Room 3310
Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: Senate Bill 621 (Caballero): Health care coverage: biosimilar drugs: Support

Dear Chairperson Eggman,
On behalf of the City of Hollister, I am pleased to offer our strong support of SB 621, which increases patient access to certain low cost medications that are just as effective as brand named drugs.

Hollister is a city in and the county seat of San Benito County. The population reported in the 2020 census was of 41,678, and Hollister is primarily an agricultural town. The City of Hollister strives to ensure the welfare of its residents, forming strong alliances and partnerships with healthcare providers.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, per capita spending on prescription drugs increased by 700% between 1980 and 2018. Many patients pay tens of thousands of dollars annually in out-of-pocket costs for life-saving medications. The high cost of prescription drugs is in part due to the lack of competition that branded drug companies receive from lower-priced - but equally effective -treatment options.

Biosimilars are drugs that are rigorously tested and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as having “no clinically meaningful difference” from a brand named drug in terms of safety, purity, and potency. This means that biosimilars are just as safe and effective as a brand named drug, while also being less expensive. For products with biosimilar competition, biosimilars have reduced costs between 18 and 50%. Despite biosimilars’ widespread adoption in Europe, barriers to their adoption remain in the United States.

SB 621 (Caballero) would allow health plans to have the tools to directly access a lower-cost biosimilar before the equivalent brand drug. This bill also extends relevant patient protections to the usage of biosimilars, such as the ability of a provider to request that the original brand treatment be utilized. A prescriber in California will have to approve the use of a biosimilar prior to it being administered to a patient. Ultimately, SB 621 will give patients greater access to treatments for diseases such as arthritis and diabetes, by helping patients access lower-cost and equally effective alternatives to expensive brand named prescription drugs.

A.9.a
Packet Pg. 178

For these reasons and that SB 621 (Caballero) would further the City of Hollister’s goal of ensuring its residents have access to necessary care and promote a healthy community, we are proud to support SB 621 (Caballero) when it is heard in the Senate Health Committee.

Best regards,

Mayor Mia Casey
City of Hollister
A.9.a
Packet Pg. 179

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 11, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: LETTER OF SUPPORT - SENATE BILL 870 (CABALLERO): HOSPITAL

CLOSURE PREVENTION ACT

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Senator Caballero’s office recently contacted City staff to request letters of support for three bills to improve healthcare accessibility in rural California and reduce financial strains on hospitals.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve a letter of support for SB 870 (Caballero): Hospital Closure Prevention Act to be sent to the Senate Committee on Health.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: California State Senator Anna Caballero recently sponsored SB 870, which would renew the Managed Care Organization (MCO) tax to leverage access to federal funds to make resources available to invest in healthcare solutions. It could serve as a tool for higher Medi-Cal reimbursement rates, which benefits hospitals, doctors, and other providers across the state. SB 870 could also help increase the number of doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals by investing in scholarship and tuition reimbursement for practicing or working in economically disadvantaged communities. The MCO tax will increase access to healthcare for low-income communities of color, and provide a long-term solution to prevent the collapse of dozens of small hospitals throughout California.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A

CEQA: N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

1. SB 870 Letter of Support

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.10
Packet Pg. 180

CITY OF HOLLISTER

375 FIFTH ● HOLLISTER, CA 95023-3876

May 1, 2023
The Honorable Susan Eggman, Chair
Senate Committee on Health
1021 O Street, Suite 3310
Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: Senate Bill 870 (Caballero): Hospital Closure Prevention Act: Support

Dear Chairperson Eggman,
On behalf of the City of Hollister, I am pleased to offer our strong support for SB 870, which will leverage the Managed Care Organization (MCO) tax as a tool to help stabilize the healthcare system in the State of California.

Hollister is a city in and the county seat of San Benito County. The population reported in the 2020 census was 41,678 residents, and Hollister is primarily an agricultural town. The City of Hollister strives to ensure the welfare of its residents, forming strong alliances and partnerships with healthcare providers.

The COVID-19 pandemic drained $12 billion from hospitals, and skyrocketing prices for pharmaceuticals, staff, and medical supplies have put many hospitals on the brink of collapse. In January 2023, a rural community hospital in Madera closed its doors. Without immediate action, experts warn that dozens of hospitals across the state are at risk of closing or declaring bankruptcy. This would have serious consequences for patient care across the state. One recent study showed that hospital closures in rural areas resulted in a 9% increase in mortality rates for medical emergencies.

Furthermore, the hospitals most in danger of closing are small hospitals that service a high proportion of Medi-Cal patients. These hospitals are at most risk of collapse due to the low rates of Medi-Cal reimbursements. For every dollar that it costs to care for Medi-Cal patients, California pays only 74 cents. California’s low Medi-Cal reimbursement rates for physicians and other providers—48th in the nation—mean that these small hospitals have trouble recruiting doctors and nurses as well.

Most Medi-Cal enrollees are low income people of color. The low rate of Medi-Cal reimbursement has resulted in a two-tiered healthcare system, where the hospitals serving communities who need healthcare most are at the greatest risk of collapse.

California’s tax on Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) has served, in the past, as an engine for state financing. It has historically generated enough revenue to ensure that Medi-Cal reimbursements are the same or higher and produced an additional ~1.5 billion dollars each year A.10.a
Packet Pg. 181

for investment in a variety of state programs. In December 2022, the MCO Tax expired, stripping California of an integral mechanism for financing many important state programs.

SB 870 would renew the Managed Care Organization tax to leverage access to federal funds to make resources available to invest in healthcare solutions. It could serve as a tool for higher Medi-Cal reimbursement rates, which benefits hospitals, doctors, and other providers across the state. It could also help increase the number of doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals by investing in scholarship and tuition reimbursement for practicing or working in economically disadvantaged communities. The MCO tax will increase access to healthcare for low-income communities of color, and provide a long-term solution to prevent the collapse of dozens of small hospitals throughout California.

For these reasons, and that SB 870 (Caballero) would further the City of Hollister’s goal of ensuring its residents have access to necessary care and promote a healthy community, we are proud to support SB 870 (Caballero) and encourage your “aye” vote when it is heard in your committee.

Best regards,

Mia Casey, Mayor
City of Hollister
A.10.a
Packet Pg. 182

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 19, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Clerk
Jennifer Woodworth, City Clerk

TITLE OF ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-70, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING THE CONTRIBUTION FOR TWO YEARS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $5,000 PER FISCAL YEAR TO UNITED WAY OF SAN BENITO COUNTY 2-1-1

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The City Council will consider a resolution to approve $10,000 in funding, over a period of two years, for United Way 2-1-1 of San Benito County.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution approving $10,000 in funding, $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2023-24, for United Way 2-1-1 of San Benito County.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: The United Way 2-1-1 of San Benito County is a non-profit organization that provides assistance to those that need help finding services. Their goal is to find the different options that are available, they work for individuals in need.

The City of Hollister has supported the 2-1-1 program in the past.

The City of Hollister has received a request to continue providing support to the organization. United Way is seeking a commitment of $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2023-24 for a total contribution amount of $10,000.

The City of Hollister has historically provided support in the amount of $2,500 to the United Way. However, the request to increase the City’s contributions from $2,500 annually to $5,000 annually is due to the loss of the sponsorship funds from Hazel Hawkins Memorial Hospital. Other sponsors include San Benito County Office of Emergency Services, San Benito County Health and Human Services, and First 5.

Staff recommends the City Council approve the resolution to provide assistance to United Way for their 2-1-1 program.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 contribution in the amount of $5,000 has been included in the Fiscal Year 20022-23 Adopted Budget. Funding for the Fiscal Year 2023-24 contribution in the amount of $5,000 will be included as part of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Recommended Budget that will be presented to the City Council for consideration in June 2023.

CEQA: Not a project.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 211 United Way of San Benito County 2022 Annual Report

2. 211 Letter to the City of Hollister

A.11
Packet Pg. 183

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.11
Packet Pg. 184

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-70

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING THE CONTRIBUTION FOR TWO YEARS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $5,000 PER FISCAL YEAR TO UNITED WAY OF SAN BENITO COUNTY 2-1-1

WHEREAS, United Way 2-1-1 of San Benito County is a non-profit organization that provides assistance to those that need help finding services; and

WHEREAS, the City of Hollister supported this organization in the past; and

WHEREAS, United Way submitted a request to the City of Hollister for continued support; and

WHEREAS, the City of Hollister would like to continue that support by contributing $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and $5,000 in Fiscal Year 2023-24.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Hollister hereby authorizes a total contribution of $10,000 to United Way of San Benito County for 2-1-1 Services, with $5,000 contributed in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and $5,000 contributed in Fiscal year 2023-24.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Hollister at a Regular Meeting held this 1st day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lozano Smith Attorneys at Law

Mary F. Lerner, City Attorney

A.11
Packet Pg. 185

I, JENNIFER WOODWORTH, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hollister, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2023-70, is an original Resolution, or true and correct copy of a City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Hollister at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of May, 2023, at which meeting a quorum was present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hollister this City Council day of May, 2023.

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC

City Clerk of the City of Hollister
A.11
Packet Pg. 186

1 2022 Annual Report
Feb ruary 11, 2023
A.11.a
Packet Pg. 187

Our Mis s ion
Our Imp ac t
2022 Texting C ampaigns
Top Needs in San Benito with 211
Referred Agencies
Succ ess Story
211 Sponsors
pg.3
pg.4
pg.5
pg.6
pg.7
pg.8
pg.9
Table of Contents
A.11.a
Packet Pg. 188

“Get Connected.Get Help”
Our mission is to con n ect San Ben ito County’s most vulnerab le with the heal th and human service resources they need.
h eal th an d h u man service resources they
Our Mission
3 Respect and compassion for all people. Excellent customer service.

Community benefit is at the forefront of all we do. Entrepreneurial, collaborative, and innovative spirit. Efficient and sustainable services.

Integrity in all we pursue and provide.

Our Values
A.11.a
Packet Pg. 189

Our Impact in 202 2
211’S IMPACT IS CAPTUR ED BY THE NUMBER OF CONNEC TI O NS THAT ARE MADE TO RESOURCES THR OUGH OUR PHONE SERVICE,OUR W EBSIT E,AND THROUG H OUR COMMUNIT Y PARTNERS.THE NUMBERS CAPTUR E D THROUG H OUR DATABASE NOT ONLY SHOW US W HO CALLED 211 AND HOW W E’VE HELPED THEM BUT IT AL SO HELPS GI VE US A GLIMPSE INTO W HAT THE NEEDS ARE SPECIFIC TO OUR COMMUNI TY. 513
Nu mb er of d istin ct cal l s
710
Nu mb er of referral s
18 Nu mb er of 2-way text
4 A.11.a
Packet Pg. 190

2022 Texting CampaignsText the Keyword to 2 11-211
5 Campaign Description
We'll screen you for 18 social safety net benefits at the federal,state and local levels through BenefitKitchen.com when you te xt BENEFITS.

BENEFITS
Keywords
Provide information of the Housing Is Key program.

Get screened for CalEITC eli gibility and get referred to myfreetaxes.org to file for free.

You'll also receive i nformati on re lated to tax returns and updates that UWCA learns about.

We'll connect you to our Ki nshipCareCA.org website and C all C enter if you text KIN SHIP.You'll be able to find local resources and best-fit servi ce provi ders on the website, by phone wi th trained staff,or by text -24/7.

Text the keyword GETACP to 211 -211 to receive information on how to apply for the Affordability Connectivity Program. ACP could help households to afford the broadband they need for work, school, healthcare and more.

RENT
TAXES

KIN SHIP
GETACP
COVID-19 You'll receive up dates and important information about COVID19.

A.11.a
Packet Pg. 191

Top Needs in San Benito with 211
6 Housing (187)
Utility Services (74)
Legal Services (34)
Additional Categories # of Needs
Health & Supportive Services 25
Community Groups and Government/Administrative Offices 22 Public Assistance Programs 19
Information Services 15
Transportation 12
Temporary Financial Assistance 12Food(34)
A.11.a
Packet Pg. 192

Top Five Referred Agencies
7 Agency # of Referrals
Community Services & Workforce Development 105
Catholic Charities Diocese of Monterey 81
California Rural Legal Assistance Inc.50
Health and Human Services Agency San Benito County 27
Seniors Council of Santa Cruz and San Benito Counties 24 A.11.a
Packet Pg. 193

Success Story
Ramon has not been able to pay for his rent since 2020 due to Covid -19. Ramon called 211 hoping he could get referred to an agency that could help him. 211 was able to give Ramon a referral to Housing is Key program. A call specialist then asked him if he had other needs. Ramon needed the covid -19 booster shot; the 211-call specialist was able to schedule him an appointment and provided him with a free Lyft ride to go to the health center and back to his home. Ramon couldn’t believe he was helped in just 8 minutes! He was so excited to learn about 211 and told the call specialist he will be calling back to learn of any agencies providing free tax preparation during tax season.
8 A.11.a
Packet Pg. 194

We are grateful to our funders:

City of Hollister
First 5 SBC
Hazel Hawkins Hospital
PG & E
SBC Office of Emergency Services
SBC Health & Human Services
Individual donors
Thank you!
10 A.11.a
Packet Pg. 195

United Way of San Benito County

PO Box 186
Hollister, CA 95024
tel 831.245.0051
www.unitedwaysbc.org

2021-2023 Advisory Board
Tiffany Arguelles, Danielle Burke, Jeanette Campbell, Mary Damm, Julie Giannotta, Bette Hagins, Krystal Lomanto, Jill Macfarlane, Shawna McKenzie, Elvira Paniagua, Samantha Rodriguez, Michele Stephenson, Florinda Tamez
Director: Vicki Fortino

April 18, 2023
Daisy Caceres
Deputy City Clerk
City of Hollister
375 Fifth Street
Hollister, Ca 95023

Dear Daisy:

United Way of San Benito County would like to request support for the 211 call/text helpline for the current fiscal year 2022/23 and fiscal year 2023/24. Your continued support ensures that the 211 call center is there for our residents who need valuable information regarding city, county and nonprofit services in our Community. The call center has been crucial to our community during the recent covid-19 crisis and more recently, the flooding. The 211 helpline is also valuable to help maintain that 911 calls are for actual emergencies, and not information.

I respectfully request that the City of Hollister increase the contribution to $5000.00 per fiscal year. This will ensure that the helpline is fully funded, as Hazel Hawkins Hospital is no longer able to contribute $2500.00 as a sponsor.

However, we will be extremely grateful for any amount that the City is able to contribute.

Sincerely,

Vicki Fortino
Vicki Fortino
Director; United Way of SBC
www.unitedwaysbc.org

A.11.b
Packet Pg. 196

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 24, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

Engineering
Glen March, City Engineer

TITLE OF ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-71, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER REJECTING THE BID RECEIVED ON APRIL 10, 2023 FOR CIP C1816 WEST GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (ENGINEERING)

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: This resolution will reject the bid received on April 10, 2023 for CIP C1816 West Gateway Improvement Project.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution rejecting the bid received on April 10, 2023 for the CIP C1816 West Gateway Improvement Project.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: On February 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-23 which authorized staff to solicit sealed bids for the West Gateway Improvement Project, CIP C1816.

On April 10, 2023, the City of Hollister received one bid from Granite Rock Company, in the amount of $4,816,331.30., which is substantially higher than the Engineer’s estimate of $3,258,762.43.

Staff planned to award two construction contracts - West Gateway Improvement Project and the West Gateway Landscaping Project - to implement the West Gateway Beautification Project. Staff will work with the engineering consultant to reduce the cost of the West Gateway Beautification Project.

Staff will request the authorization from the City Council to approve the revised construction contract documents and to solicit sealed bids for the construction of the project in the Winter of 2023-2024. Staff working with the City’s grant consultant confirmed that the project must be completed in three years after the bid opening (2026) to be eligible for reimbursement of the $3,000,000 CDBG grant.

Staff recommends the City Council reject the bid received on April 10, 2023 from Granite Rock in the amount of $4,816,331.30 as it was significantly higher than the engineer’s estimate of probable construction costs.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: None.

CEQA: Exempt

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager
A.12
Packet Pg. 197

A.12
Packet Pg. 198

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-71

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER REJECTING THE BID RECEIVED ON APRIL 10, 2023 FOR CIP C1816 WEST GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT (ENGINEERING)

WHEREAS, on February 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-23 which authorized staff to solicit sealed bids for the West Gateway Improvement Project, CIP C1816; and

WHEREAS, on April 10, 2023, the City of Hollister received one (1) bid from Granite Rock Company in the amount of $4,816,331.30; and

WHEREAS, the amount of the bid was substantially higher than the engineer’s estimate of probable construction cost of $3,258,762.43; and

WHEREAS, approval of this resolution does not adversely impact the City’s ability to get reimbursed for eligible costs from the $3,000,000 CDGB grant for the project; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hollister rejects the bid received for CIP C1816 the West Gateway Improvement Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Hollister at a Regular Meeting held this 1st day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lozano Smith Attorneys at Law

Mary F. Lerner, City Attorney

A.12
Packet Pg. 199

I, JENNIFER WOODWORTH, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hollister, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2023-71, is an original Resolution, or true and correct copy of a City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Hollister at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of May, 2023, at which meeting a quorum was present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hollister this City Council day of May, 2023.

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC

City Clerk of the City of Hollister
A.12
Packet Pg. 200

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 19, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

City Attorney
Mary Lerner, City Attorney

TITLE OF ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-72, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF HOLLISTER ADOPTING THE UNIFORM PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION COST

ACCOUNTING ACT

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Adoption of the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act will simplify and expedite public project contracting.

RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution adopting the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Public Contract Code, public projects costing more than Five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder following publication of two notices inviting bids. The Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act, adopted in 1983, and which can be found at Public Contract Code, § 22000 et seq. (the “Act”), established alternative informal procedures for bidding and contracting for public projects and increased the limits when formal bidding is required. The City may elect to become subject to the Act by passing a resolution so stating and adopting an ordinance providing for the Act’s informal bidding procedures.

Under the Act, public projects under sixty thousand dollars ($60,000.00) may be performed by the City’s own employees,’ negotiated contract, or purchase order. Public projects under two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) may be contracted by informal bidding pr ocedures which require the City to maintain a list of qualified contractors by category of work and provide notice to contractors on that list (as well as specified trade journals) inviting bids at least ten (10) days before bids are due. Upon completion of the informal bidding process, the City would award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Alternatively, the City may reject all bids and use the City’s own employees if it can demonstrate that doing so will be more economical; however, the stringent accounting procedures under the Act may make this option less feasible.

For public projects over two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00), the City would be required, with minor exceptions, to undertake formal bidding procedures in accordance with the Act and other applicable provisions of the Public Contract Code. These procedures would include notice inviting formal bids published in a newspaper of general circulation at least fourteen (14) days before the date of opening the bids and electronic notice inviting formal bids sent to specified trade journals at least fifteen (15) days before the opening of bids. At the conclusion of the formal bidding process, the City would award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.

The City should adopt the Act because the informal bidding process allowed by the Act will be simpler, faster, and likely result in less cost to the City.

An additional benefit of the informal bidding procedures under the Act is that the dollar amount thresholds for informal and formal bidding are adjusted every five years by the State Controller’s Office. As a result, these bidding thresholds will likely increase over time.

It is important to note that the Act only applies to public projects, not the purchase of goods or services.

A.13
Packet Pg. 201

FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact.

CEQA: N/A

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

A.13
Packet Pg. 202

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-72

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER ADOPTING THE

UNIFORM PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION COST ACCOUNTING ACT

WHEREAS, public agencies must competitively bid all public works projects (as defined in Section 20161 of the Public Contract Code) in excess of $5,000.00 in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Public Contract Code, commencing with Section 20160; and

WHEREAS, in 1983, the California Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 1666, which added Chapter 2, commencing with Section 22000, to Part 3 of Division 2, of the Public Contract Code, which establishes a uniform cost accounting standard for construction work contracted out or self-performed by cities, and also provides for alternative informal procedures for bidding public projects; and

WHEREAS, Public Contract Code Section 22030 provides that any city wishing to use the alternative informal procedures for biding and contracting for public projects must elect, by resolution to become subject to the construction cost accounting procedures set forth in the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act and must notify the State Controller of its election; and

WHEREAS, Public Contract Code Section 22034 requires each public agency that elects to become subject to the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act to enact an ordinance for informal bidding procedures; and

WHEREAS, concurrently herewith, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. [ORDINANCE NUMBER], and upon adoption said ordinance will enact procedures governing public works contracts and establishes, among other things, informal bidding procedures in accordance with the requirements of Section 22034 of the Public Contract Code.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hollister does hereby resolve as follows:

1. That the City Council hereby elects under Public Contract Code Section 22030 to become subject to the uniform public construction cost accounting procedures set forth in the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Commission’s policies and procedures manual and cost accounting review procedures, as they may each from time to time be amended.

2. That the City Clerk is directed to notify the State Controller forthwith of this election.

3. This resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Hollister at a Regular Meeting held this 1st day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

A.13
Packet Pg. 203

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lozano Smith Attorneys at Law

Mary F. Lerner, City Attorney

A.13
Packet Pg. 204

I, JENNIFER WOODWORTH, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hollister, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2023-72, is an original Resolution, or true and correct copy of a City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Hollister at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of May, 2023, at which meeting a quorum was present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hollister this City Council day of May, 2023.

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC

City Clerk of the City of Hollister
A.13
Packet Pg. 205

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2023
SUBMITTED: April 13, 2023
DEPARTMENT:

DEPARTMENT HEAD:

Planning
Christine Hopper, Development
Services Director

TITLE OF ITEM: ORDINANCE NO. 2033 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-4 TO ADOPT CHAPTER 17.36

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM

BRIEF DESCRIPTION: An Ordinance to Adopt a new Chapter 17.36, Inclusionary Housing Program, into the Zoning Ordinance, which would require new residential development to provide 20% affordable housing units on-site.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council introduce an Ordinance to adopt Chapter 17.36 Inclusionary Housing Program, hold a public hearing, and schedule a second reading of the Ordinance for the May 15, 2023 City Council meeting.

DEPARTMENT SUMMARY:

The City of Hollister has engaged with PlaceWorks to prepare the City’s 2040 General Plan Update (GPU). In community discussions, City leaders discussed prioritizing the a ffordable housing stock in Hollister and developing strategies to facilitate the development of affordable housing units. One specific strategy discussed is the creation of an inclusionary housing ordinance to require all new residential development projects to include a percentage of affordable housing units. The City Council, based on recommendations from the General Plan Advisory Committee and Planning Commission, provided staff direction to incorporate an action item into the General Plan Update calling for the creation of a citywide inclusionary housing ordinance that requires all for-sale and rental residential development projects to provide 20% affordable housing units on-site.

In addition, the City of Hollister was awarded SB 2 Planning Grant funding, part of which was allocated for the creation of an inclusionary housing ordinance. With the policy direction that resulted from the ongoing GPU, Staff was directed by the City Council to establish an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance for the City of Hollister with a 20% affordability requirement, and to prepare a feasibility analysis to assess the potential impacts of that requirement on the financial feasibility of a range of development prototypes.

BACKGROUND:

Assembly Bill (AB) 1505 was enacted to ensure that inclusionary housing ordinances do not unduly constrain housing production or deprive developers of fair and reasonable returns on their investments. Per AB 1505, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has the authority to review the financial feasibility analysis of a local inclusionary housing program if the program requires more than 15 percent of rental units to be restricted to households earning less than 80 percent of the area median income (AMI). AB 1505 also states that HCD may request review of the Feasibility Analysis if any of the following are true:

 The City failed to meet 75% RHNA over 5-year period; or

E.1
Packet Pg. 206

 The City failed to submit housing element for 2+ years.

As a result of AB 1505 and to ensure the City is meeting all State requirements, staff consulted with PlaceWorks to complete a financial feasibility analysis of the 20 percent inclusionary requirement directed by City Council, and to identify incentives required to offset potential financial constraints posed by the requirement. The financial feasibility analysis is based on a series of pro formas of five residential development “prototypes” that are representative of current development trends in Hollister. For each development prototype, the financ ial feasibility of a fully-market rate scenario is compared to the financial feasibility of a scenario that fulfills the 20% inclusionary requirement. The financial feasibility analysis also identifies strategies that are required to be implemented within the proposed ordinance in order to assure that the ordinance does not constrain development.

ANALYSIS:

Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility

Methodology

Feasibility studies for inclusionary housing ordinances determine the quantity of aff ordable housing units that proposed development project(s) can bear while remaining financially feasible. The financial impacts of an inclusionary housing requirement on a residential development project can be determined by comparing the difference between the financial performance of a fully market-rate development project to the same project that provides the required number of below-market rate (BMR) units, while also receiving any available density bonus and other allowed incentives.

Pro Forma

PlaceWorks prepared a series of pro forma financial analyses for each development prototype to identify whether, and how, a 20 percent affordability requirement could be supported by the market-rate components of the project. The pro formas rely on multi-year cash flow projections to achieve the most accurate evaluation of feasibility. PlaceWorks developed three for-sale and two for-rent housing development prototypes that reflect recent development patterns in Hollister. PlaceWorks developed these prototypes using multiple inputs to ensure they are representative of local development patterns and provide for the most accurate analysis possible within the limitations of a financial feasibility assessment.

The five analyzed prototypes are as shown:

 Prototype 1 For-Sale. Low-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 4 dwelling units per acre.

 Prototype 2 For-Sale. Medium-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 10 dwelling units per acre.

 Prototype 3 For-Sale. High-density stacked-flat condominium project comprising a four-story building with 12 residential units over tuck-under parking, for a gross density of 40 units per acre.

 Prototype 4 Rental. Medium-scale three-story apartment development at a density of 20 units per acre.

E.1
Packet Pg. 207

 Prototype 5 Rental. Larger-scale four-story apartment development at a density of 32 units per acre.

The financial feasibility of each development prototype was analyzed under three different scenarios. The industry-accepted metric of 15% Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was used to determine the feasibility of the for-sale prototypes; 6% Cash-on-Cash (COC) Yield was used for the rental projects:

1. Fully Market Rate Scenario. This scenario consists of a fully market rate development prototype, without the introduction of affordability requirements.

2. Inclusionary Scenario. Under this scenario, seven percent of the development prototype’s housing units are dedicated to very low income households, seven percent to low income households, and six percent to moderate income households, for a total of 20 percent. This scenario also includes the maximum 25% State Density Bonus which is afforded for projects which provide seven percent very low income units.

3. Local Bonus Scenario. In all five development prototypes, the Inclusionary Scenario resulted in financial infeasibility. The Local Bonus Scenario was developed to identify the number of additional market-rate units beyond those allowed under state density bonus law, that would be needed to achieve financial feasibility with the inclusionary requirement. It is assumed this additional density would be facilitated by a locally adopted density bonus allowance.

Summary

Overall, the financial feasibility analysis found the Fully Market-Rate Scenarios of all five development prototypes were financially feasible. The for-sale prototypes achieved IRRs of 17 to 47%, while the rental prototypes demonstrated COC Yields at or above six percent. This is not surprising given they are based on current development patterns and reflect current market trends.

As noted above, the Inclusionary Scenarios of all five prototypes dropped to infeasible levels.

For-sale projects showed IRRs of 6.3% to -19.4% and rental projects achieved COCs of 5.7% and 5.9%. This indicates that a 20% inclusionary requirement consisting of roughly equal proportions of very-low-, low- and moderate-income units will render residential development projects financially infeasible. The addition of units per State Density Bonus L aw is not sufficient to offset that impact.

The results of the Local Bonus Scenario illustrate the additional density that would be required to bring the inclusionary projects to feasibility. This increase ranges from up to 15% for rental projects to up to 55% for smaller, for-sale projects. As such, the analysis finds that in order to ensure that a 20% inclusionary requirement does “unduly constrain” development, the City of Hollister should provide the additional ordinance components:

 A local density bonus allowance that goes beyond the required by State law.

 Increases in allowed site density to accommodate bonus densities.

 An in-lieu fee for rental housing projects, to meet State requirements for an alternative to on-site inclusionary housing provision in rental projects.

E.1
Packet Pg. 208

 An allowance for for-sale residential projects to include affordable attached single -family units in a proportion that constitutes more than the proportion of attached units in the overall project.

 An allowance for single-family detached residential units counted toward the inclusionary requirement to have smaller lots than single-family detached market-rate units in the same residential project.

Inclusionary Ordinance

The purpose of this Inclusionary Housing Ordinance is to enhance the public welfare by facilitating the development of housing affordable to households of very-low, low, and moderate income, and to ensure the utilization of developable land in the City of Hollister is compatible with State and local housing policies. Requiring inclusionary below market rate (BMR) units within each residential development project is consistent with the City’s current Housing Element goals of developing affordable housing opportunities, creating diverse housing opportunities for existing and future residents, and maintaining economic diversity and geographically dispersed affordable housing.

Goals of the 2015-2023 Housing Element

Goal H4.1 promote a fair share of well-designed affordable and varied housing in all neighborhoods throughout the City.

Goal H4.4 of the 2015-2023 Housing Element establishes the primary intent to adopt an inclusionary housing policy around the year 2020.

Goal H4.6 focuses on establishing resale controls with future grant and inclusionary programs to ensure homes are maintained at an affordable rate through longer periods of time.

Key Provisions

Within the Inclusionary Ordinance is a set of key provisions as guidance to how the ordinance will be implemented on all future residential development projects.

As shown in Section 17.17.050 of the ordinance, the inclusionary requirements are broken into three income categories to equal the 20% inclusionary requirement with more emphasis is targeted to provide more very-low and low income units.

 At least seven percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to Very Low Income Households.

 At least seven percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to either Very Low Income or Low Income Households.

 At least six percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to Moderate Income Households.

Project Size Exemption

The ordinance indicates residential project developments 10 units or less are not subject to the inclusionary ordinance. All residential development projects greater than 10 units are subject to the inclusionary ordinance and expected to provide 7% very-low, 7% low, and 6% moderate income units.

E.1
Packet Pg. 209

Location & Size of Inclusionary Units

All inclusionary units must demonstrate the following requirements:

 Be built on the same site as the remainder of the Residential Development Project and be reasonably dispersed throughout the Residential Development Project to prevent a concentration of affordable units.

 Have the same access to common open space and shared facilities in the Residential Development Project as do the Market Rate Units.

 Be dispersed throughout the residential development project(s)

Fractional Units

If the number of for-sale and rentals inclusionary units result in a fractional unit equal to one -half (0.5) or more, the fraction shall be rounded to, the next higher whole number and an additional Inclusionary Unit shall be provided. If the number of for-sale and rentals inclusionary units result in a fraction less than one-half (0.5), the developer shall have the option of rounding up to the next whole number and providing the Inclusionary Unit or paying a fee in lieu of providing an additional Inclusionary Unit.

In-Lieu Fee

In-lieu fees shall be set by resolution of the city council and shall be an amount sufficient to pay the proportionate cost of providing Inclusionary Units elsewhere in the city. The fee shall be periodically reviewed and updated by the city council. The amount of in lieu fees shall be included in the City's master fee schedule and may be adjusted annually for inflation using an appropriate index, as determined by the city council.

In-Lieu Payments

A developer of a Rental Residential Development Project may pay a fee may in lieu of providing Inclusionary Units or to offset required fractional units below one-half (0.5) of a unit. A developer of a For-Sale Residential Development Project may only pay a fee to offset required fractional units below one-half (0.5) of a unit and cannot pay a fee in lieu of providing Inclusionary Units.

Density Bonus

The City shall provide a density bonus of up to 56% for for-sale residential projects, and up to 15% for rental residential projects.

Timing of Payment

Payment of in-lieu fees shall be due at the issuance of building permits for the Rental Residential Development Project. For Rental Residential Development Projects constructed in phases, in-lieu fees shall be paid prior to issuance of each building permit in the proportion the phase bears to the overall Rental Residential Development Project.

Unit Type & Physical Quality

E.1
Packet Pg. 210

 Be built in the same proportion as the Market Rate Unit Types, except as provided in Sections 17.17.080.C and 17.17.080.D.

 Have an average square footage of at least 85 percent of Market Rate Units with the same bedroom count.

 Be developed with the same bedroom count ratio as the Market Rate Units.

 Have the same interior finishes and features as the Market Rate Units.

 Have the same exterior design and overall quality of construction as the Market Rate Units.

Income Requirements & Resale Restrictions

The inclusionary program will require households purchasing an affordable unit qualify based on income and the sales price qualify as affordable to the household. Additionally, the city’s ordinance will restrict future resales for a term of thirty (30) years, so the next purchasing household must also be income-qualified and the sales price represent an affordable housing payment for the purchasing household. If the home is sold within the term, the new homeowner will be subject to a full thirty (30) year affordability requirement.

Monitoring

Homeowners will receive an annual monitoring notice from the City to confirm the owner occupancy requirement and prohibitions against rental of the dwelling. For rental units, an annual monitoring notice from the City will be sent to all management agencies to confirm residents are eligible to affordable units.

PLANNING COMMISSION:

At the March 23, 2023 regular meeting of the City of Hollister Planning Commission, the Commission voted unanimously to adopt a resolution recommending approval of the draft ordinance to the City Council (Resolution 2023-10 attached). There were no proposed changes to the draft ordinance, and no members of the public provided comment during the public hearing.

The full presentation and discussion of the Inclusionary Housing Program can be viewed at the following link, beginning at the 1:17:38 timestamp.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1Y450raoTw

The presentation slides which were presented to the Planning Commission are also included as an attachment to this report.

CONCLUSION:

The City of Hollister seeks to use the inclusionary ordinance as a tool to assist in the production of affordable housing. Inclusionary housing is not intended as a single solution to Hollister’s affordable housing needs. Accomplishing state and local housing goals will require an additional combination of planning and zoning strategies, city policy decisions and regional coordination.

However, an inclusionary housing program is one tool that will help the City to meet its RHNA and is discussed in the current Housing Element and a goal in the General Plan Update. City of E.1
Packet Pg. 211

Hollister staff recommend the City Council to receive and accept the financial feasibility study. In addition to the study, provide staff direction on the adoption of the inclusionary housing ordinance Section 17.36 of the City of Hollister Municipal Code.

CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS:

The City Council can choose one of the following options:

1. Introduce the draft ordinance with the intention to approve a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to adopt Chapter 17.36, Inclusionary Housing Program, with the draft Chapter 17.36 included as Exhibit A and the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis included as Exhibit B.

2. Introduce the draft ordinance with the intention to approve a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to adopt Chapter 17.36, Inclusionary Housing Program, with the draft Chapter 17.36 included as Exhibit A and the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis included as Exhibit B with modifications by the City Council; or

3. Continue the hearing and direct staff to provide additional information or clarification.

Staff recommends the City Council select Option 1 for this Item.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: $0

CEQA: The proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines because the proposed amendments will not result in any direct physical change to the City and therefore the proposed amendments are not a project under CEQA and are exempt from further review (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15378). Future development of a site will be subject to the requirements of CEQA.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit A. DRAFT_IH_FFA_3.15.23

2. Attachment 1. Resolution 2023-10_ZOA 2023-4_Inclusionary Housing

3. Attachment 2. 3.23.23_Hollister PC_Pres_Inclusionary Housing

THIS REPORT WAS REVIEWED BY THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER WHO CONCURS WITH

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION

David Mirrione, Interim City Manager

E.1
Packet Pg. 212

ORDINANCE NO. 2033

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-4 TO ADOPT CHAPTER 17.36 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM

WHEREAS, the State of California requires local governments to plan to meet the housing needs of all income groups. Specifically, "local and state governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community" pursuant to the State Government Code Section 65580; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that there is a demand for affordable housing for very low, low, and moderate income households in the City of Hollister as documented in the City of Hollister Housing Element; and

WHEREAS, Housing Element Goal H4 of the General Plan requires the City to develop affordable housing opportunities in the City. Furthermore, Policy H.4 of the Housing Element requires the City to establish a program for increasing affordable housing in the City by requiring residential developers to provide a percentage of the units within a residential development to very low, low and moderate income households; and

WHEREAS, on August 3, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-147 accepting awarded grant funding from Housing and Community Development related to the Senate Bill 2:

Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB2) planning grant program; and

WHEREAS, as part of the ongoing 2040 General Plan Update, the City Council at its regular June 21, 2021 discussed affordable housing within the City and potential inclusionary requirements and directed Staff include a 20 percent affordability component as a recommended policy within the 2040 General Plan Update; and

WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021 the City Council, based on the recommended policy direction for the General Plan Update, directed Staff to conduct a financial feasibility analysis and prepare an inclusionary ordinance which requires residential developers to include a 20 percent affordability component utilizing the award SB Planning Grant funds; and

WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022 Staff discussed the inclusionary ordinance with the City Council and the City Council reaffirmed that the inclusionary ordinance should be prepared which requires a 20 percent affordability component for all residential projects; and

WHEREAS, the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis dated January 2023 was prepared by PlaceWorks and is included to this Resolution as Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS, the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis used, appropriate methodology to compare the difference between the financial performance of a fully market-rate development project and one that provides the required number of below-market rate (BMR) units while also receiving any available density bonus and other allowed incentives; and

WHEREAS, the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis finds that a 20% inclusionary requirement for for-sale and rental residential projects, consisting of roughly equal proportions of very-low-, low- and moderate-income unit, is financially feasible if the City of Hollister provides additional incentives to the developer as defined in the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis; and

E.1
Packet Pg. 213

WHEREAS, based on policy direction for the 2040 General Plan Update from the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), Planning Commission, City Council, and the results of the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis, Staff has prepared Draft Chapter

17.36, Inclusionary Housing Program, which requires a 20 percent affordability component for all residential developments over 10 units and includes additional incentives, as recommended in the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis, to ensure financial feasibility of the inclusionary requirement; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on March 23, 2023 to review the new Chapter 17.36, Inclusionary Housing Program, during which all interested parties were heard; and

WHEREAS, after closing the public hearing the Planning Commission determined to adopt Resolution 2023-10 recommending approval of the draft ordinance to the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on May 1, 2023 to review the new Chapter 17.36, Inclusionary Housing Program, during which all interested parties were heard; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines because the proposed amendments will not result in any direct physical change to the City and any future development projects will be subject to the requirements of CEQA and therefore the proposed amendments are not a project under CEQA and are exempt from further review (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15378); and

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hollister does hereby ordain as follows:

Title 17 Zoning is amended to add Chapter 17.36 Inclusionary Housing Program, which shall read as follows:

Chapter 17.36 – Inclusionary Housing Program

17.36.010 – Chapter Title

The Ordinance codified in this chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Inclusionary Housing Program" of the City of Hollister.

17.36.020 – Purpose

The purpose of this Inclusionary Housing Program is to:

A. Enhance the public welfare by facilitating the development of housing affordable to households of Very Low, Low, and Moderate Income.

B. To ensure that future residential development is consistent with housing policies of the State of California and the City of Hollister.

C. To ensure that each Residential Development Project complies with the requi rements of this Chapter and is consistent with the city's housing goals of developing affordable housing opportunities, creating diverse housing opportunities for existing and future residents, and maintaining economic diversity and geographicall y dispersed affordable housing.

E.1
Packet Pg. 214

17.36.030 – Definitions

A. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) shall have the same meaning as defined under Section 65852.2(j) of the Government Code and shall mean an attached or detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family dwelling. An ADU also includes an efficiency unit and a manufactured home, provided it is built on a permanent foundation. An ADU may be located within an existing attached or detached garage, shed, barn or other accessory structure.

B. Administrator shall mean the Inclusionary Housing Program Administrator, which shall either be the City itself or a third-part administrator acting as an agent for the City in connection with all aspects of the operation of the Inclusionary Housing Program pursuant to an Agreement entered into between the City and the Administrator, as such agreement may be amended or replaced from time to time.

C. Affordable Dwelling Unit shall mean, for the purposes of this Chapter, a dwelling unit affordable to households earning at or below 120 percent of the county median income, including units that are affordable to Very Low, Low, and Moderate Income Households.

D. Attached Single-Family Dwelling Unit for the purposes of this Chapter shall mean a single-family dwelling unit having one or more walls attached to and in common with one or more single-family dwellings, with each dwelling unit on a separate parcel.

E. Density Bonus shall mean a density increase over the otherwise maximum allowable density on a site, as may be permitted by the City of Hollister in Chapter 17.34, Density Bonus (referred to as the “Local Bonus” in this Chapter, or pursuant to California Government Code Section 65915 and Article 15.04.602 (referred to as the “State Bonus” in this Chapter, or for any other reason.

F. Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit shall mean a dwelling unit intended for use by a single household and not attached to any other building.

G. For-Sale Residential Development Project shall mean a Residential Development Project that includes the creation of one or more new dwelling units that may be sold individually. A For-Sale Residential Development Project also includes the conversion of a residential rental development to a residential ownership development.

H. Inclusionary Unit shall mean a dwelling unit intended for sale or rent that is required by Article 17.36.050 to be affordable to Very Low, Low, or Moderate Income Households.

I. Low Income Household shall mean a household whose income does not exceed the low income limits applicable to San Benito County as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5 and published annually pursuant to Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 6932 by the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

J. Market Rate Unit shall mean a new dwelling unit in a Residential Development Project that is not an Affordable Dwelling Unit.

E.1
Packet Pg. 215

K. Moderate Income Household shall mean a household whose income does not exceed the moderate income limits applicable to San Benito County as defined in Califo rnia Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5 and published annually pursuant to Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 6932 by the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

L. Multi-Family Unit shall mean a residential unit intended for the use of a single household that is part of a larger building having one or more walls attached to and in common with other residential units.

M. Rental Residential Development Project shall mean a Residential Development Project that creates one or more dwelling units that cannot be lawfully sold individually in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act.

N. Residential Development Project shall mean a development for which a discretionary approval or building permit is required for a residential development that includes the creation of one or more new dwelling units, conversion of nonresidential uses to dwelling units, or the conversion of a use from a Rental Residential Development Project to a For-Sale Residential Development Project.

O. Unit Type shall mean the type of dwelling unit, either Attached Single-Family Dwelling Unit, Detached Single-Family Dwelling Unit, or Multi-Family Unit.

P. Very Low Income Household shall mean a household whose income does not exceed the very low income limits applicable to San Benito County as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5 and published annually pursuant to Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 6932 by the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

Q. Vesting Tentative Map shall mean a map which confers certain vested rights to proceed with development for a specified period of time after recordation.

17.36.040 – Effective Date and Inclusionary Housing Requirement Applicability

A. Applicability. All For-Sale and Rental Residential Development Projects that consist of 10 or more units built anywhere in the City of Hollister shall comply with the requirements of this chapter.

B. Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to the following projects:

1. Accessory Dwelling Units.

2. Residential Development Projects with less than 10 dwelling units.

3. Residential Development Projects on property with vested rights in effect on the effective date of this chapter, including:

a. Property that is part of a Vesting Tentative Map.

b. Development that is part of an existing development agreement with the City.

E.1
Packet Pg. 216

4. Residential Development Projects that have submitted a complete planning or building permit application along with the full payment of required application fees to the city prior to the effective date of this ordinance, provided that such Residential Development Projects shall comply with any approved affordable housing plan and any predecessor ordinance applicable to the development.

5. Residential Development Projects exempted by California Government Code Section 66474.2 or 66498.1, provided that such Residential Development Projects shall comply with any predecessor ordinance, resolution, or policy in effect on the date the application for the development was determined to be complete.

6. Residential Development Projects exempted by another state law or by final judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction.

17.36.050 – Inclusionary Housing Requirements

All new Residential Development Projects shall include Inclusionary Units. Calculations of the number of Inclusionary Units shall be based on the number of dwelling units in the Residential Development Project, without regard to any density bonus units as defined in this chapter. All required Inclusionary Units shall be built on the same site as the Residential Development Project.

A. Inclusionary Requirement. Twenty percent of all new Residential Development Projects shall be Inclusionary Units. The twenty percent total shall be achieved using the following allowable ranges of affordability. :

1. At least 7 percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to Very Low Income Households.

2. At least 7 percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to either Very Low Income or Low Income Households.

3. At least 6 percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to either Very Low Income, Low Income or Moderate Income Households.

B. Rental Residential Development Projects. Instead of providing required inclusionary units on site, Rental Residential Development projects may pay the in-lieu fee specified in Section 17.36.060.

C. Fractional Units. When the application of the percentages specified in Section

17.36.060.A results in a number that includes a fraction equal to one-half (0.5) or more, the fraction shall be rounded to the next higher whole number. In that event an additional Inclusionary Unit shall be provided. If the result includes a fraction less than one-half (0.5), the developer shall have the option of rounding up to the next whole number and providing the Inclusionary Unit or paying a fee in lieu of providing an additional Inclusionary Unit. The amount of the fractional in-lieu fee shall be calculated as provided in Section 17.36.060.

D. State Density Program. Any Inclusionary Units provided on site in compliance with this chapter may be used to qualify for a density bonus under Chapter 17.34, Density E.1
Packet Pg. 217

Bonus, California Government Code Section 65915, or any ordinance implementing Government Code Section 65915..

E. Local Incentives. Projects subject to this ordinance shall be entitled to the Local Incentives described in Section 17.17.070.

F. Base for Inclusionary Requirement. The number of Inclusionary Housing units required for a project shall be based on the total number of dwelling units in the Residential Development Project prior to the addition of units under the State Bonus or the additional Local Bonus.

G. Affordable Housing Agreement. The applicant shall execute a written agreement with the City indicating the number, type, location, approximate size, and co nstruction schedule of all dwelling units as required to determine project compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

H. Construction Timing. All Inclusionary Units shall be built prior to the full build -out of Market Rate Units in the same Residential Development Project. In phased developments, inclusionary units shall be constructed and occupied in proportion to the number of Market Rate Units constructed and occupied in each phase.

1. A building permit may not be issued for any Market Rate Unit unle ss a proportional number of building units has been issued for inclusionary units.

2. A certificate of occupancy or final inspection may not be issued for Market Rate Units unless a proportional number of certificates of occupancy or final inspections have been issued for inclusionary units.

17.36.060 – Inclusionary Requirement In-Lieu Fees

As provided for in Sections 17.36.050.B and 17.36.050.C, a developer of a Rental Residential Development Project may pay a fee may in lieu of providing Inclusionary Units or to offset required fractional units below one-half (0.5) of a unit. A developer of a For-Sale Residential Development Project may only pay a fee to offset required fractional units below one-half (0.5) of a unit.

A. Purpose. This in-lieu fee is an option that may serve as an alternative to the provision of on-site inclusionary units as otherwise required by Section 17.36.050. Nothing in this chapter shall deem or be used to deem the in-lieu fee authorized in this section as an ad hoc exaction, as a mandated fee required as a condition to developing property, or as a fee subject to the analysis in Building Industry Association of Central California v. City of Patterson, 171 Cal.App.4th 886 (2009).

B. Allowance. In-lieu fees may be paid as follows:

1. For-Sale Residential Development Projects. The developer of a For -Sale Residential Development Project may pay an in-lieu fee only for fractional units when the number of required inclusionary units includes a fraction less than one - half.

2. Rental Residential Development Projects. The developer of a Rental Residential Development Project may pay an in-lieu fee for all or any portion of inclusionary units required, including fractional units.

E.1
Packet Pg. 218

C. Amount. In-lieu fees shall be set by resolution of the city council and shall be an amount sufficient to pay the proportionate cost of providing Inclusionary Units elsewhere in the city. The fee shall be periodically reviewed and updated by the city council. The amount of in lieu fees shall be included in the City's master f ee schedule and may be adjusted annually for inflation using an appropriate index, as determined by the city council.

D. Timing of Payment. Payment of in-lieu fees shall be due at the issuance of building permits for Rental Residential Development Project. For Rental Residential Development Projects constructed in phases, in-lieu fees shall be paid prior to issuance of each building permit in the proportion that the phase bears to the overall Rental Residential Development Project. Payment of a For-Sale fractional unit below one-half (0.5) of a unit shall be due prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time the permit is used.

E. Use. The City shall use in-lieu fees paid under this chapter to support the development of new housing affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate-income households on sites in the City, and improve and preserve the existing supply of affordable housing in the City. In-lieu fees paid under this chapter may also be used to support appropriate Inclusionary Housing Program implementation and enforcement, provided the fees allocated toward these activities are established by city council resolution per Section 17.36.090.A.

F. Management. All in-lieu fees and other monies on deposit with the City shall be separately accounted for and shall not be used for purposes not authorized by Section

17.36.060.

17.36.070 – Inclusionary Housing Incentives

The City of Hollister will grant the following incentives to the developer of a Residential Development Project that provides required inclusionary units:

A. Density Bonus. A density bonus pursuant to Chapter 17.34, Density Bonus, of the Municipal Code, as follows:

1. For-Sale Residential Project: Up to 56% density bonus.

2. Rental Residential Project: Up to 15% density bonus.

This bonus is in addition to the density bonus allowed for affordable housing projects under State law, and shall be calculated as a percentage of the base Residential Development Project. Under no circumstance shall the total of the total Density Bonus (including both the Local Bonus and the State Bonus) exceed 66% for For-Sale Residential Projects and 40% for Rental Residential Projects, unless a greater Density Bonus is required by State law.

B. Modification of Zoning or Development Standards. The developer may be granted modifications to zoning and/or development standards as required to achieve the density bonus described in Section 17.36.070.A. Authority to act on a request for these development incentives shall rest with the final review authority regarding the underlying application.

17.36.080 - Inclusionary Unit Standards

E.1
Packet Pg. 219

The following standards shall apply to all Inclusionary Units built to satisfy the requirements of this chapter.

A. Recipient Requirements. All inclusionary units shall be sold or rented to:

1. Moderate Income, Low Income or Very Low Income Households;

2. The City of Hollister or its designee.

B. Unit Type and Physical Quality. The Unit Types of the Inclusionary Units within a Residential Development Project shall:

1. Be built in the same proportion as the Market Rate Unit Types, except as provided in Sections 17.36.080.C and 17.36.080.D.

2. Have an average square footage of at least 85 percent of Market Rate Units with the same bedroom count.

3. Be developed with the same bedroom count ratio as the Market Rate Units.

4. Have the same interior finishes and features as the Market Rate Units.

5. Have the same exterior design and overall quality of construction as the Market Rate Units.

C. For-Sale Single-Family Residential Development Projects may include affordable Attached Single-Family Dwelling Units in a proportion that constitutes more than the proportion of Attached Single-Family Dwelling Units in the overall project.

D. Affordable Detached Single-Family Dwelling Units counted toward the inclusionary requirement may have smaller lots than Market Rate Detached Single -Family Dwelling Units in the same Residential Development Project, provided that all lot sizes are consistent with the lot size requirements of this Title 17 (Zoning).

E. Location. All Inclusionary Units shall:

1. Be built on the same site as the remainder of the Residential Development Project and be reasonably dispersed throughout the Residential Development Project to prevent a concentration of affordable units.

2. Have the same access to common open space and shared facilities in the Residential Development Project as do the Market Rate Units.

3. Be dispersed throughout the Residential Development Project.

F. Eligibility Screening. The Administrator shall screen prospective buyers or renters of affordable units. Buyers of affordable units shall enter into an agreement with the City.

Occupants must be selected by means of an open, public process ensures that individuals of a group of interested participants are selected in accordance with the City’s Live-Work Policy. Private selection of individuals by project owners is not permitted for any affordable units.

G. Ongoing Affordability of For-Sale Units. In order to maintain the availability of For-Sale Inclusionary Units constructed pursuant to this chapter, the following requirements shall E.1
Packet Pg. 220

apply to Inclusionary Units, as documented through an affordable housing agreement, as prescribed in Section 17.36.080.H, recorded against the property:

1. The affordable sales prices of for-sale Inclusionary Units shall be restricted to a period of thirty years pursuant to an affordable housing agreement recorded against the property and resets upon resale of the unit(s).

2. The owner shall occupy the Inclusionary Unit as the owner's principal place of residence within 60 days of the owner's receipt of a certificate of occupancy for the unit.

3. The owner shall reside in the Inclusionary Unit for at least 10 months out of each calendar year to be considered as occupying the Inclusionary Unit.

4. The owner shall not lease or rent the Inclusionary Unit or any portion of the Inclusionary Unit to another party. Any lease of the Inclusionary Unit or a portion of the Inclusionary Unit will constitute a default under the requirements of this chapter.

H. Ongoing Affordability of Rental Units. In order to maintain the availability of Inclusionary Units constructed pursuant to this chapter, rental Inclusionary Units shall remain affordable for fifty-five years, as documented through an affordable housing agreement, as prescribed in Section 17.36.080.H, recorded against the property.

I. Affordability Agreement Documentation. The developer shall be required to execute standard documents, in a form approved by the city attorney, to ensure the continued affordability of the Inclusionary Units approved for each Residential Development Project. The documents may include, but are not limited to, Inclusionary Housing agreements, regulatory agreements, promissory notes, deeds of trust, resale restrictions, rights of first refusal, options to purchase, and/or other documents. The affordability documents shall be recorded against the Residential Development Project, all Inclusionary Units, and any site subject to the provisions of this chapter.

17.36.090 – Implementation and Enforcement

A. Establishment of Guidelines by Resolution. If it so desires, the city council may adopt inclusionary housing guidelines, by resolution, to assist in the implementation of this chapter.

B. Establishment of Administration Fees by Resolution. The city council, by resolution, may establish fees for the ongoing administration and monitoring of the affordable units, which fees may be updated periodically, as required.

C. Enforcement. The city attorney is authorized to enforce the provisions of this chapter and all inclusionary housing agreements, regulatory agreements, covenants, resale restrictions, promissory notes, deeds of trust and other requirements placed on Inclusionary Units by civil action and any other method permitted by law. The city may take such enforcement action as is authorized under this code and/or any other action authorized by law or by any regulatory document, restriction, or agreement executed under this chapter.

E.1
Packet Pg. 221

D. Project Approval Restrictions. No permit, license, map, or other approval or entitlement for a Residential Development Project shall be issued, including without limitation a final inspection or certificate of occupancy, until all applicable requirements of this chapter have been satisfied.

E. Annual Monitoring. Homeowners will receive an annual monitoring notice from the City to confirm the owner occupancy requirement and prohibitions against rental of the dwelling. The review will provide owners with an opportunity to become familiar with the guidelines of the Inclusionary Housing Program and any changes in adopted policies and procedures. For rental units, an annual monitoring notice from the City will be sent to all management agencies to confirm residents are eligible to affordable units.

INTRODUCED at a regular City Council meeting on the 1st day of May, 2023.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Hollister at a Regular Meeting held this 1st day of May, 2023, by the following vote:

Mia Casey, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lozano Smith Attorneys at Law

Mary F. Lerner, City Attorney

E.1
Packet Pg. 222

I, JENNIFER WOODWORTH, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hollister, do hereby certify that the attached Ordinance No. 2033 is an original Ordinance, or true and correct copy of a City Ordinance, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Hollister at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1st day of May, 2023, at which meeting a quorum was present.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Hollister this City Council day of May, 2023.

Jennifer Woodworth, MMC

City Clerk of the City of Hollister
E.1
Packet Pg. 223

March 2023

Inclusionary Housing Program
Financial Feasibility Analysis

Administrative Draft

Prepared for:

City of Hollister

Prepared by:

PLACEWORKS
2040 BANCROFT, SUITE 400
BERKELE Y, CALIFORNIA 94704
510.848.3815
WWW.PLACEWORKS.COM

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 224

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 225

i
Table of Contents

1.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Feasibility Impact ................................................................................................................ 1-3

1.3 In-lieu Fees .......................................................................................................................... 1-2

1.4 Implications for a Local Ordinance ..................................................................................... 1-4

2.1 Feasibility Studies Vs Nexus Studies ................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Limits of Feasibility Studies ................................................................................................ 2-2

2.3 Legal Backgound ................................................................................................................. 2-2

2.4 Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Components ................................................................... 2-4

2.5 State Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing .................................................................. 2-5

2.6 City council Inclusionary Housing Direction ....................................................................... 2-6

3.1 Housing Need in Hollister ................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 Analytical Approach ............................................................................................................ 3-1

3.3 Density Bonus Units ........................................................................................................... 3-5

4.1 Affordable Housing Payments for For-sale Housing ........................................................... 4-7

4.2 For-Sale Development Prototypes and analyses .............................................................. 4-10

4.3 Disposition Requirements ................................................................................................ 4-24

5.1 Affordable Household Rents ............................................................................................... 5-1

5.2 For-Rent Development Prototypes and analyses ............................................................... 5-2

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 226

ii
TABLES
Table ES.1: Feasibility Summary, For-Sale Development Prototypes............................................................ 1-1 Table ES.2: Feasibility Summary, Rental Development Prototypes .............................................................. 1-2 Table 1.1: State Density Bonus Allowances .................................................................................................. 2-6 Table 3.1: Density Bonus as Percentage Increase in market-rate Units by Income .................................... 3-5 Table 4.2: HCD Income Limits by Household Size and Income Classification; San Benito County; 2022 .... 4-8 Table 4.3: Calculation of Affordable-Housing sales Price by Household Size and Income Classification (All data in 2022 Dollars); Hollister; 2022 ...................................................................................... 4-9 Table 4.4: Prototype 1 Housing Sizes and Sales Values .............................................................................. 4-10 Table 4.5: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ............................................................... 4-12 Table 4.6: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ............................................................... 4-12 Table 4.7: Prototype 1 Project Income ........................................................................................................ 4-12 Table 4.9: Prototype 1 Financial Feasibility Summary ................................................................................ 4-14 Table 4.11: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ............................................................. 4-16 Table 4.12: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ............................................................. 4-16 Table 4.13: Prototype 2 Project Income ..................................................................................................... 4-16 Table 4.14: Prototype 2 Project Costs ......................................................................................................... 4-18 Table 4.15: Prototype 2 Financial Feasibility Summary .............................................................................. 4-19 Table 4.16: Prototype 3 Housing Unit Sizes and Sales Values .................................................................... 4-20 Table 4.17: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ............................................................. 4-21 Table 4.18: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ............................................................. 4-21 Table 4.19: Prototype 3 Project Income ..................................................................................................... 4-21 Table 4.20: Prototype 3 Project Costs ......................................................................................................... 4-22 Table 4.21: Prototype 3 Financial Feasibility Summary .............................................................................. 4-23 Table 5.1: Calculation of Affordable Rents by Household Size and Income Classification (All data in 2022 Dollars); Hollister; 2022 ........................................................................................................... 5-2 Table 5.2: Prototype 4 Housing Sizes and Monthly Rents (Assuming a 9.1 percent Rent increase) ............ 5-3 Table 5.3: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ................................................................. 5-4 Table 5.4: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ................................................................. 5-4 Table 5.5: Prototype 4 Project Income .......................................................................................................... 5-5 Table 5.6: Prototype 4 Project Costs ............................................................................................................. 5-6 Table 5.7: Prototype 4 Financial Feasibility Summary .................................................................................. 5-7 Table 5.8: Prototype 5 Housing Sizes and Monthly Rents ............................................................................ 5-8 Tab le 5.9: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ................................................................. 5-9 Table 5.10: Number of Units by Type, Affordability, and Scenario ............................................................... 5-9 Table 5.11: Prototype 5 Project Income ..................................................................................................... 5-10 Table 5.12: Prototype 5 Project Costs ......................................................................................................... 5-11 Table 5.13: Prototype 5 Financial Feasibility Summary .............................................................................. 5-12

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 227

iii
Appendix A: Prototype 1: Income, Cost and Feasibility Details Appendix B: Prototype 2: Income, Cost and Feasibility Details Appendix C: Prototype 3: Income, Cost and Feasibility Details Appendix D: Prototype 4: Income, Cost and Feasibility Details Appendix E: Prototype 5: Income, Cost and Feasibility Details

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 228

iv

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 229

1-1
Executive Summary
PlaceWorks, Inc. has been engaged by the City of Hollister to prepare the City’s General Plan Update.

Early in the process, City leaders prioritized increasing the affordable housing stock in Hollister and developing strategies to do so. As a result, the Land Use and Community Design Element of the Draft General Plan includes Goal L-3, to “Promote diverse housing opportunities for existing and future residents.” This goal is supported by draft Action L3.1, which reads “Adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance that requires new residential developments to include 20 percent of the units as affordable housing.”
In order to implement Action L3.1, the City has contracted with PlaceWorks to prepare an inclusionary housing ordinance.

Per Assembly Bill (AB) 1505, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has the authority to review a local inclusionary housing program if the program requires more than 15 percent of rental units to be restricted to households earning less than 80 percent of the area median income (AMI). AB 1505 requires jurisdictions with such inclusionary requirements to submit feasibility analyses to HCD upon HCD’s request, and the analyses must show “evidence that the [proposed] ordinance does not unduly constrain the production of housing.”1Since the City’s proposed inclusionary requirement is for 20 percent affordable units, the City has also asked PlaceWorks to prepare this financial feasibility study to document the feasibility of the proposed requirement.

1.1 METHODOLOGY
The financial feasibility of an inclusionary housing requirement on a residential development project can be ascertained by comparing the difference between the financial performance of a fully market-rate development project and one that provides the required number of below-market rate (BMR) units while also receiving any available density bonus and other allowed incentives.

To complete this comparison, PlaceWorks prepared detailed financial feasibility analyses to assess the impact on feasibility of the proposed affordability requirements on five different prototypical housing projects. The analyses identify the following:
 The impact on feasibility of a 20 percent affordability requirement on each of the five market-rate for- sale and rental residential development projects.
 The rate of density bonus beyond that required under State law and other development incentives required to achieve feasibility with a 20 percent inclusionary requirement.

1 State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, Rental Inclusionary Housing Chapter 486, Statutes of 2017.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 230

1-2
 The supportable quantity of fees that could potentially be paid in lieu of constructing affordable units on site.

1.1.1 PRESUMED REQUIREMENTS
Based on guidance from the City Council and on discussions with City of Hollister staff, PlaceWorks developed an outline for the City’s draft inclusionary housing ordinance that includes the following requirements:
 All for-sale and rental residential projects would be required to include affordable housing in the following percentages (for a total of 20% affordable units):
 At least 7 percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to Very Low Income Households.  At least 7 percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to either Very Low Income or Low Income Households.
 At least 6 percent of the dwelling units shall be affordable to either Very Low Income, Low Income or Moderate Income Households.
 Rental residential projects would be allowed an alternative means of compliance, as required by State law. In this case, we presume an in-lieu fee would be allowed.  A density bonus that exceeds that required by State law, accompanied by zoning flexibility to allow for this bonus, would be allowed if required order to make inclusionary housing financially feasible.

1.1.2 DEVELOPMENT PROTOYPES
PlaceWorks developed multiple for-sale and for-rent housing development prototypes that reflect recent development projects and patterns in Hollister. PlaceWorks developed these protypes using multiple inputs to ensure they are representative of local development patterns and provide for the most accurate analysis possible within the limitations of a financial feasibility assessment.

As part of the work to develop the prototypes, PlaceWorks completed a market survey of home sales and rent prices to estimate achievable values of each protype. The PlaceWorks team surveyed Hollister rental apartments rates, compiled from CoStar data, as part of the detailed Market Demand Analysis submitted to the City. PlaceWorks expanded this survey using data about rental prices from various real estate aggregators, and surveyed home sales prices in Hollister by compiling Redfin sales data for single family homes, multifamily homes and condominiums.

FOR-SALE PROTOTYPES
PlaceWorks defined the following three development protypes for for-sale housing based on our review of recently constructed and permitted housing projects in Hollister:
 Prototype 1: Low-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 4 dwelling units per acre.
 Prototype 2: Medium-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 10 dwelling units per acre.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 231

1-3
 Prototype 3: High-density stacked-flat condominium project comprising a four-story building with 12 residential units over tuck-under parking, for a gross density of 48 units per acre.

RENTAL PROTYPES
PlaceWorks defined the following two development protypes for for-rent housing based on our review of recently constructed and permitted housing projects in Hollister:
 Prototype 4: Medium-scale three-story apartment development at a density of 20 units per acre.  Prototype 5: Larger-scale four story apartment development at a density of 32 units per acre.

The prototypes do not reflect any particular lot or parcel nor location in the city. The financial feasibility of any prototype on a specific site would be expected to vary.

1.1.3 PRO FORMA ANALYSIS
PlaceWorks prepared a series of pro forma financial analyses for each development prototype to identify whether, and how, a 20 percent affordability requirement could be supported by the market-rate development prototypes. The pro formas rely on multi-year cash flow projections to achieve the most accurate evaluation of the feasibility of real estate projects. The resulting metrics of feasibility were calculated and used to determine the feasibility of projects:
 Internal Rate of Return, 15% minimum. Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was calculated to assess the feasibility of the for-sale development prototypes. IRR measures the developer’s return on investment with a discounted cash flow model. It is based on the net cash flow for each year during project planning, construction, and sale. The key feasibility question is whether cash flows from sales are large enough to pay back the initial investment, plus a sufficient return to compensate for the investment risk. For real estate investments, an IRR of 15 percent is generally considered the threshold for a proposed project to be considered financially feasible.  Cash-on-Cash Yield, 6% minimum. PlaceWorks calculated Cash-on-Cash Yield to assess the financial feasibility of for-rent development prototypes. The cash-on-cash yield is an industry standard metric for rental projects, and it measures the net revenue relative to the developer’s investment for the first full year of occupancy. A cash-on-cash yield of six percent or more is generally considered the threshold for a proposed project to be considered financially feasible.

1.2 FEASIBILITY IMPACT
The financial feasibility of each development prototype was analyzed under three different scenarios:

1. Fully Market Rate Scenario. This scenario consists of a fully market rate development prototype, without the introduction of affordability requirements.

2. Inclusionary Scenario. This scenario consists of the density, number of units and unit type established in the fully market rate scenario but with BMR units compliant with a 20 precent inclusionary requirement applied to the number of units in the Fully Market Rate Scenario. Under this scenario, six percent of the Fully Market Rate Scenario’s housing units are dedicated to moderate income households, seven percent to low income households, and seven percent to very low income E.1.a
Packet Pg. 232

1-4
households for a total of 20 percent. This scenario also includes the maximum number of new units allowed under California’s Density Bonus Law (Cal. Gov. Code Sections 65915 – 65918).

3. Local Bonus Scenario. This scenario includes additional market-rate units that would be needed, in addition to units allowed under the state density bonus law, to achieve financial feasibility with the inclusionary requirement. It is assumed that this additional density would be facilitated by a locally- adopted density bonus allowance.

This analysis also includes discussions of the Base Scenario for each prototype. Like the Inclusionary Scenario, this scenario accounts for a 20 percent affordability requirement. Unlike the Inclusionary Scenario, this scenario does not include a state density bonus. As such, it is not included in the feasibility analyses. It is used to illustrate the development implications of changing density programs on a project that complies with the base inclusionary housing ordinance, including changes in the number of market rate units, below market rate units, and unit types.

1.2.1 FOR-SALE PROTOTYPES
Table ES-1 summarizes the financial feasibility of the Fully Market Rate, Inclusionary and Local Bonus Scenarios for each for-sale development prototype. The table also includes the Base Scenarios to illustrate the breakdown of market rate and below market rate units resulting when the 20 percent affordability requirement is applied to the Fully Market Rate Scenario.

As shown in Table ES-1, the Fully Market Rate Scenarios of all three for-sale residential development prototypes are financially feasible based on the IRR threshold of 15 percent. This is not surprising, as they are indicative of existing and planned development in the City. However, the inclusionary scenarios of all three prototypes saw a significant drop in IRR, such that none would be financially feasible without additional densities.

Table ES-1 shows that the additional density bonus (beyond that required under State law) that would be required to achieve financially feasible for-sale developments that comply with a 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement is just over 40 percent for Protype 1, about 30 percent for Prototype 2, and 35 percent for Protype 3.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 233

1-1
TABLE ES.1: FEASIBILITY SUMMARY, FOR-SALE DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPES

Prototype 1: Low Density Detached Prototype 2: Medium Density Detached Prototype 3: High Density Condominium Fully
Market
Rate
Scenario
Base
Scenario Inclusionary
Housing
Scenario
Local
Bonus
Scenario
Fully
Market
Rate
Base
Scenario Inclusionary
Housing
Scenario
Local
Bonus
Scenario
Fully
Market
Rate
Scenario
Base
Scenario Inclusionary
Housing
Scenario
Local
Bonus
Scenario
Market-
Rate Units 220 174 229 315 220 174 229 244 12 9 12 19
BMR
Units 0 46 46 46 0 46 46 46 0 3 3 3
Total
Units 220 220 275 361 220 220 275 290 12 12 15 22
Local
Density
Bonus
0 0 0 39% 0 0 0 6.8% 0 0 0 55.8%
Feasibility
(IRR) 17.4% -18.6% 15.2% 47.3% 6.3% 15.3% 46.5% -19.4% 17.3%

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 234

1-2

1.2.2 RENTAL PROTOTYPES
Table ES-2 summarizes the financial feasibility of the Fully Market Rate, Inclusionary and Local Bonus Scenarios for each rental prototype. The table also includes the Base Scenarios to illustrate the breakdown of market rate and below market rate units resulting from the 20 percent affordability requirement.

As shown in Table ES-2, the Fully Market Rate Scenarios of both rental residential development prototypes are financially feasible based on a cash-on-cash yield threshold of six percent. When the 20 percent inclusionary requirement is applied and the State Density Bonus maximized, cash-on-cash yield drops for both protypes to rate that is financially infeasible.

Table ES-2 shows that the additional local density bonus that would be required to achieve financially feasible rental developments that comply with a 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement is 14 percent for Prototype 4 and 15 percent for Protype 5.

TABLE ES.2: FEASIBILITY SUMMARY, RENTAL DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPES

Prototype 4: Medium Scale Apartment Complex Prototype 5: Larger Scale Apartment Complex Fully
Market
Rate
Scenario
Base
Scenario Inclusionary
Housing
Scenario
Local
Bonus
Scenario
Fully
Market
Rate
Scenario
Base
Scenario Inclusionary
Housing
Scenario
Local
Bonus
Scenario
Market-rate
Units 30 22 30 35 120 94 124 141
BMR Units 0 8 8 8 0 26 26 26
Total Units 30 30 38 43 120 120 150 167
Local Density
Bonus 0 0 0 14.0% 0 0 0 15.0%
Feasibility
(Cash on cash
yield)

6.0%

5.7% 6.0% 6.4%

5.9% 6.0%

1.3 IN-LIEU FEES
According to Cal. Gov. Code Section 65850 (g), jurisdictions that adopt inclusionary ordinances with affordability requirements for rental development must offer developers other options for fulfilling the requirements besides on-site construction. The option of paying fees in lieu of on-site construction may be valuable because the fees facilitate the transfer of affordable requirements to developers that specialize in affordable housing development and operation. Dedicated affordable housing developments also have access to local, state and federal public funding sources that may support greater affordability than inclusionary housing requirements, and they can better provide public programs and services to lower-income households. At the same time, the advantage of having developers build on-site affordable housing is that the housing would be available at the same time as the new market-rate housing.

Furthermore, the affordable housing would be integrated into mixed-income neighborhoods rather than concentrated in stand-alone projects.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 235

1-3
The city will have the option of adopting surplus-based in-lieu fees, which are based on the financial surplus created by development of market-rate housing; or cost-based in-lieu fees, which are set to allow for the development of affordable housing at the same rate as required under the inclusionary program.

The current Draft Hollister Inclusionary Housing Ordinance developed by PlaceWorks requires a cost- based in-lieu fee, or an amount “sufficient to pay the proportionate cost of providing inclusionary units elsewhere in the city.” The fee amount is not included in the ordinance and would be adopted separately by resolution. As explained below, the recommended fee range is $44,000 to $52,000 per inclusionary unit.

1.3.1 SURPLUS-BASED FEES
“Surplus-Based Fees” are fees that would be charged based on the financial surplus created by development of market-rate housing. Fees structured in this way typically do not cover the full costs of developing affordable housing units on alternative sites.

The analysis found that high-density for-rent multifamily housing projects would generate a feasibility surplus that would support an in-lieu fee of $15,600 per unit of required affordable housing. Fees at these levels enable the project to be financially feasible at or with a 6% yield.

If an in-lieu fee is allowed as an alternative to on-site construction at such a rate, market-rate rental housing developers would likely choose to pay the fee so as to be able to build a 100% market-rate project, rather than needing to build and manage an affordable component in their project, which might present both development and management obstacles.

These feasible per-unit in-lieu fees would not be sufficient to construct an equivalent housing unit that could be rented at an affordable housing payment. However, the fees would generate funding that the city could use to partner with affordable housing developers to help them leverage additional funding sources in order to develop fully affordable housing projects in the city. Because an affordable housing developer would leverage other funding, the city’s contribution could result in affordable rental projects that create a higher number of affordable housing units than would have been developed in mixed- income inclusionary housing projects. However, the projects that are most likely to receive other funding are typically for-rent multifamily housing projects consisting of very low and low income units; it is unlikely that low- or moderate income units would be included in these stand-alone projects.

1.3.2 COST-BASED FEES
“Cost-Based Fees” are fees that are set to allow for the development of affordable housing through in- lieu fees at the same rate as required under the inclusionary program.

The analysis indicates that the cost to develop a multifamily rental unit is $220,000 to $260,000, or $44,000 to $52,000 per unit spread over five units to reflect the proposed 20% inclusionary requirement.

The analysis suggests that there would likely be few projects where a fee in this amount would be financially attractive. Thus, a fee in this amount would incentivize developers to build mixed-income inclusionary housing projects rather than availing themselves of the alternative to pay an in-lieu fee.

The primary benefit of cost-based fees is that the city would have the funding to ensure that affordable housing that meets the needs of lower-income households gets built.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 236

1-4

1.4 IMPLICATIONS FOR A LOCAL ORDINANCE
PlaceWorks has developed the Draft Hollister Inclusionary Housing Ordinance based on the results of this feasibility analysis. The ordinance reflects the affordability requirements identified in the Draft General Plan, the components outlined above, and the results of this feasibility analysis.

1.4.1 OVERALL FEASIBILITY
This analysis finds that a 20% inclusionary requirement consisting of roughly equal proportions of very low-, low- and moderate income units is financially feasible in Hollister, provided that certain additional program components are included. These components are:
 A density bonus program that goes beyond that required by State law, as outlined below.  Increases in allowed density to achieve bonus densities.  An in-lieu fee for rental housing projects, to meet State requirements for an alternative to on-site inclusionary housing provision in rental projects.
 An allowance for for-sale residential projects to include affordable attached single-family units in a proportion that constitutes more than the proportion of attached units in the overall project.  An allowance for single-family detached residential units counted toward the inclusionary requirement to have smaller lots than single-family detached market-rate units in the same residential project.

1.4.2 DENSITY BONUS
Most of the nearly 200 inclusionary housing ordinances adopt by local jurisdictions in California include development incentives such as density bonuses to lessen the impacts of affordability requirements on project feasibility. These incentives balance the interests of developers against the public benefit created by the production of affordable units.

This financial feasibility analysis in this report found that an inclusionary housing requirement for 20 percent affordable housing is not financially feasible to develop when the only incentive available is the State Housing Density Housing Bonus law. To adopt a 20 percent inclusionary requirement, the city would need to provide an additional density bonus—from 30.7 to 40.5 percent for for-sale single-family detached housing, 35 percent for for-sale multifamily housing, and 15 percent for for-rent multifamily housing—on top of the State density bonus.

These results are reflected in the current Draft Hollister Inclusionary Housing Ordinance developed by PlaceWorks.

1.4.3 IN-LIEU FEE
As noted above, State law requires that inclusionary requirements for rental units include options other than on-site construction. We recommend that the ordinance establish an in-lieu fee alternative to on- site construction of inclusionary housing for rental units. The ordinance could authorize the city to set the E.1.a
Packet Pg. 237

1-5
fee by separate resolution. This will give the city flexibility in determining the amount of the fees and flexibility to revise fees to reflect changing priorities and market conditions.

The fee could be either a “surplus-based” or “cost-based” fee. The current Draft Hollister Inclusionary Housing Ordinance developed by PlaceWorks requires a cost-based in-lieu fee. If the city chooses to set a surplus-based fee, the city should collaborate with affordable housing developers to identify the amount of per unit subsidy that is likely to be necessary to building future 100% affordable housing projects.

1.4.4 ADDITIONAL EXCEPTIONS
As noted above, this analysis finds the need for two additional allowances as part of any proposed inclusionary housing program:
 An allowance for single-family detached residential units counted toward the inclusionary requirement to have smaller lots than single-family detached market-rate units in the same residential project.
 An allowance for for-sale residential projects to include affordable attached single-family units in a proportion that constitutes more than the proportion of attached units in the overall project.

Both of these allowances are necessary to accommodate increases in project density associated with fulfilling the 20 percent affordability requirement. As described in Section 3.2.1, the density of Prototype 1, a 55-acre detached subdivision with 220 market rate units, would increase 63 percent under the financially feasible “Local Bonus” inclusionary housing scenario. In this case, accommodating the 139 additional market rate units on the site, while maintaining feasibility, would require decreasing the size of lots of the inclusionary units. The smaller lots size would in turn contribute to a significantly lower overall cost per unit (Section 3.2.1.4).

Similarly, as described in Section 3.2.2, the density of Prototype 2, a 22-acre detached subdivision with 220 market rate units, would increase 53 percent under the “Local Bonus” scenario. Accommodating the additional 104 market rate units and 14 BMR units would require the addition of another product type:
townhouses. These would be market-rate units, so they are not considered as affordable in the feasibility analysis. However, these attached-units and smaller lots sizes would also contribute to a lower overall cost per unit (Section 3.2.2.4).

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 238

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 239

2-1
Introduction
PlaceWorks, Inc. was engaged by the City of Hollister to prepare the city’s General Plan Update. Early in the process, city leaders prioritized increasing the affordable housing stock in Hollister and developing strategies to do so. As a result, the Draft Land Use and Community Design Element of the General Plan includes Goal L-3, to “Promote diverse housing opportunities for existing and future residents.” This goal is supported by draft Action L3.1, which reads “Adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance that requires new residential developments to include 20 percent of the units as affordable housing.” This Feasibility Analysis was developed to support the requirements and provisions of an Inclusionary Housing ordinance that is consistent with Action L3.1. The central question this Feasibility Analysis seeks to answer is: How would the proposed affordable housing requirements impact the feasibility of market- rate residential development in Hollister?
Two key factors must be considered in the creation of all inclusionary housing requirements:

1. The requirements should balance the interests of developers against the public benefit created by the production of affordable units.

2. The inclusionary housing requirements cannot deprive housing developers of a fair and reasonable return on their investment.

2.1 FEASIBILITY STUDIES VS NEXUS STUDIES
Feasibility studies and nexus studies are related yet serve different purposes. As explained further in Section 2.3, below, inclusionary housing ordinances are typically adopted as local land use regulations via a jurisdictions use of its police power. Feasibility studies for inclusionary housing ordinances determine the quantity of affordable housing that proposed development project(s) can bear while remaining financially feasible to develop.

In contrast, nexus studies need not assess project financial feasibility. Nexus studies are used to quantify impact(s) of new development, calculate the cost of this impact, and determine the fees imposed as a development condition. In the case of affordable housing, nexus studies document how much a development project (including residential and non-residential) contributes to the need for affordable housing and determine a legally defensibility impact fee. Nexus studies demonstrate that a new development project would create the need for affordable housing; the jurisdiction may, but is not required, to take into account financial feasibility when establishing the amount of the development impact fee.

For development impact fees, nexus studies determine the maximum fee that is legally defensible.

However, the jurisdiction can charge any fee up to that amount. Oftentimes, for affordable housing, cities account for financial feasibility and impose a fee lower than the maximum amount.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 240

2-2

2.2 LIMITS OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES
The results of all feasibility studies should be understood as approximate. Feasibility studies are different from real estate appraisals, which establish a value for a specific property based on data from comparable properties and projects. Feasibility studies involve more complex calculations based on a wider variety of data. While market data on home sales prices and rents is available, feasibility studies also rely on data and assumptions about land values, construction costs, operating costs, unit sizes, parking costs, and other.

The primary difference between an appraisal and a feasibility study is the scope. An appraisal is focused on a single property and is intended to provide an accurate estimate of the value of that property. In contrast, a feasibility study is intended to represent an approximate typical value for a type of development that could occur on many different properties within a jurisdiction. The values of that theoretical development may vary greatly across different properties and with different developers.

Feasibility studies depend on specific input assumptions and are more open to interpretation than appraisals. While two certified appraisers are likely to return very similar property value estimates in most cases, two well-conducted feasibility studies may still draw varying conclusions about the impact of inclusionary housing requirements on project feasibility.

2.3 LEGAL BACKGOUND
Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution grants each city and county the power “to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws.” This is referred to as the police power of local governments. California Planning and Zoning Law (Gov. Code, §§ 65000 to 66035) establishes the Legislature’s intent to “provide only a minimum of limitation in order that counties and cities may exercise the maximum degree of control over local zoning matters.”
Approximately 200 jurisdictions in California, pursuant to their police power, have adopted inclusionary housing ordinances that require developers to ensure that a certain percentage of housing units in a new development be affordable to moderate- and lower-income households. The majority of these include requirements for both for-sale and rental residential development projects.

A series of legal cases and legislation adopted by the State of California Legislature guide the creation and implementation of inclusionary housing programs. A chronological summary of the relevant issues follows.

2.3.1 COURT CASES
 Palmer/Sixth Street Properties L.P. v. City of Los Angeles. In 2009, the California Court of Appeal ruled that the local affordable housing requirements imposed by the City of Los Angeles violated the Costa- Hawkins Rental Housing Act (Costa-Hawkins). Costa-Hawkins allows landlords to set the initial monthly rent for a new unit, and then to increase the monthly rent to the market level each time a unit is vacated. The Court found that the imposition of long-term income and affordability restrictions on rental apartment units is a violation of this provision.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 241

2-3
After the Palmer decision, most jurisdictions with inclusionary housing ordinances that included rental housing stopped applying the rental requirement. Some jurisdictions replaced affordable housing production models with a linkage or impact fee methodology.  California Building Assn. V. of San Jose (2015) 61 Cal.4th 435. In 2010, the City of San Jose adopted an inclusionary housing ordinance that applied a 15 percent inclusionary requirement. The California Building Industry Association (CBIA) filed a lawsuit alleging that the requirements constituted an “exaction" that needed to be justified by the impact of the project. In a 2015, the California Supreme Court ruled that inclusionary requirements are not exactions, stating that they are “constitutionally legitimate” so long as the enforcement "bears a real and substantial relationship to the public interest." The court cited the need to increase the number of affordable units in California and the desirability of economically diverse communities.

This case has been widely interpreted to mean that an in-lieu fee payment option in an inclusionary housing program is not subject to the requirements of California Government Code §66000, the “Mitigation Fee Act.”

2.3.2 ASSEMBLY BILL 1505
Assembly Bill 1505 (AB 1505) was passed in 2017 response to the Palmer case. AB 1505 amends Section 65850 of the California Government Code and adds Section 65850.01. It supersedes the holding in Palmer, to the extent that the decision conflicts with a local jurisdiction’s authority to adopt inclusionary housing programs on residential rental developments. AB 1505 reaffirms the authority of local governments to include inclusionary rental requirements. It provides for limited, circumstantial California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) review of economic feasibility studies to demonstrate that inclusionary housing programs do not “unduly constrain” the production of housing.

Per AB 1505, HCD is not required to evaluate financial feasibility studies. Local governments are only required to submit the studies upon HCD’s request. AB 1505 gives HCD the authority to review the restrictions imposed by an inclusionary housing program on rental projects if the program requires more than 15% of units to be restricted to households earning less than 80% of the area median income (AMI), and if one of the following applies:

1. The jurisdiction has failed to meet at least 75% of its RHNA allocation for above moderate income units. This test is measured on a pro-rated basis over the planning period, which is set at a minimum of five years; or

2. HCD finds that the jurisdiction has not submitted their Housing Element report for at least two consecutive years.

HCD may request evaluation based on information in the jurisdiction’s Housing Element, Annual Progress Report, stakeholder comment letter, phone call, news article, or at the request of a third-party.

Finally, HCD will not review the actual inclusionary housing program pursuant to AB 1505. HCD’s review is limited to a review of the financial feasibility study.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 242

2-4
At this time Hollister has not met 75% of its recently-released 6th cycle RHNA allocation (see Section 2.1).

It has submitted all Housing Element Progress Reports in a timely manner. As such, HCD has the explicit right to require a review of the City’s inclusionary housing requirements imposed on rental apartment projects if more than 15% of the units are required to be restricted at less than 80% of AMI. In addition, HCD has broad authority to evaluate potential constraints to housing production as part of their Housing Element review authority.

2.4 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE COMPONENTS
The majority of inclusionary housing ordinances in California are comprised of a series of components that establish eligible developments, specific affordability requirements and alternative compliance options of the ordinance. These include:

1. Threshold Project Size. Most inclusionary housing programs include a minimum threshold project size below which projects are not subject to the affordable housing production requirements. Common size thresholds range from three to 10 units.

2. Applicable Geography . Some jurisdictions with a diverse real estate landscape impose varying inclusionary requirements for unique subareas. Others apply the inclusionary housing ordinance jurisdiction-wide.

3. Income and Affordability Requirements. Income and housing affordability requirements are the key components of inclusionary housing. They vary throughout California. The majority of ordinances require that eligible projects include 10 to 20 percent affordable units. The following variations are common:
 The inclusionary requirements vary for different levels of household affordability.  A sliding scale of inclusionary requirements for projects of varying size, developed to reduce the potentially disproportionate impact of inclusionary housing requirements on smaller projects.  The length of the covenant period imposed on inclusionary units varies from jurisdiction-to- jurisdiction. However, the standards of 45 years for ownership housing units and 55 years for rental units set by California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) Section 33413 are commonly used.

4. Inclusionary Fulfillment Options. According to Cal. Gov. Code Section 65850 (g), jurisdictions may adopt inclusionary housing ordinances with rental development requirements with the condition that the ordinances offe r developers a range of options for fulfilling the affordable housing requirements.

The most common options are:
 Construction of a defined percentage of income restricted units within new market-rate residential projects.
 Construction of a defined percentage of income restricted units in an off-site location.  Payment of a fee in lieu of producing affordable housing units that will subsequently be used by the jurisdiction to assist in the development of affordable housing units within the community.  The dedication of land to the jurisdiction that is appropriate for the development of affordable housing.
 The acquisition and rehabilitation of existing units.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 243

2-5
In-lieu fee options are considered valuable because they facilitate the transfer of affordable requirements to developers that specialize in affordable housing development and operation. Dedicated affordable housing developments also have access to local, state and federal public funding sources that may support greater affordability than inclusionary housing requirements.

2.5 STATE DENSITY BONUS AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING
California’s Density Bonus Law (Cal. Gov. Code Sections 65915 – 65918) provides developers with tools to build affordable housing. The law requires jurisdictions to provide density bonuses based on a sliding scale, including up to a 50% increase in project densities depending on the amount of affordable housing provided.

The density bonus provides one method for developers to improve the feasibility of their project while still complying with an inclusionary housing ordinance. A 2013 case, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. County of Napa, held that inclusionary units qualify as affordable units for purposes of the Density Bonus Law. Developers can use the same affordable units to fulfill both inclusionary housing requirements and density bonus requirements. However, in order to exercise this option, the more stringent of the two programs’ requirements must be applied.

The case confirmed that the density bonus is a financial tool available to help developers achieve inclusionary housing requirements. Density bonus is commonly used to reduce the financial impact created by the imposition of inclusionary housing requirements. It should be noted, however, that when the developer uses the option of an in-lieu fee (see Section 1.4) to meet inclusionary housing requirements, they do not qualify for the density bonus.

The City of Hollister’s adopted density bonus ordinance is included in Chapter 17.04, Article II, of the Hollister Municipal Code (HMC). The City’s ordinance was last updated in 2011. California Gov. Code Sections 65915-65918 have been amended by the State Legislature several times since 2011, and HMC Chapter 17.04, Article II has not been updated to reflect those modifications. Until such time as the modifications are made by the City, State law will prevail over any inconsistencies between State law and HMC Chapter 17.04, Article II.

Table 1-1 shows the scale of allowable state density bonus for increasing percentages of affordable units.

Note that there is no bonus for either low- or moderate income affordable units if they comprise less than 10 percent of the total number of units. Therefore, there would be no density bonus under State law that would result from the proposed inclusionary housing program’s requirements for low- or moderate income affordable units. However, the very low income requirements in the inclusionary housing program would trigger a 10% bonus under State density bonus law.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 244

2-6
TABLE 1.1: STATE DENSITY BONUS ALLOWANCES
Affordable Unit Percentage
(Of Pre-Bonus Unit Total)
Very Low Income Density
Bonus Low Income Density Bonus
Moderate Income Density
Bonus (For-Sale Projects Only)
5% 20% - -
6% 22.5% - -
7% 25% - -
8% 27.5% - -
9% 30% - -
10% 32.5% 20% 5%
11% 35% 21.5% 6%
12% 38.75% 23% 7%
13% 42.5% 24.5% 8%
14% 46.25% 26% 9%
15% 50% 27.5% 10%
16% 50% 29% 11%
17% 50% 30.5% 12%
18% 50% 32% 13%
19% 50% 33.5% 14%
20% 50% 35% 15%

2.6 CITY COUNCIL INCLUSIONARY HOUSING DIRECTION
The inclusionary housing provisions and requirements analyzed in this report were largely developed in response to Hollister staff and councilmember input collected during the 2021-22 general plan update process. Councilmembers established a direction for the inclusionary housing ordinance that included the following components:
 Threshold Project Size. No direction related to project size was established.  Applicable Geography : Per council direction, the inclusionary housing ordinance shall be applicable citywide.
 Income and Affordability Requirements: Per Council direction, 20 percent of units of all for-sale and rental housing development projects shall be made affordable. The inclusionary housing ordinance shall require a range Moderate, Low and Very low Income units.  Alternative Compliance Options: The City Council directed that the inclusionary housing ordinance would not include alternative compliance options such as construction of off-site affordable units.

However, as noted in Section 1.4, above, Cal. Gov. Code Section 65850 requires inclusionary housing ordinances that impose requirements on rental housing to include alternative compliance. Thus, this analysis included in this feasibility study, and resulting inclusionary housing ordinance, include an option for an in-lieu fee for rental housing.

On January 18, 2022, PlaceWorks made a presentation to the city council introducing the background and benefits of inclusionary housing ordinances, the costs associated with inclusionary housing ordinances, E.1.a
Packet Pg. 245

2-7
and the inclusionary housing preparation process. We introduced the primary components outlined in Section 1.4, above, including current council direction for each. We also presented a series of issues for the council to consider, each associated with the directives outlined above. These issues included:
 Alternatives to a citywide inclusionary housing ordinance, and the possible exemption of strategic growth and/or disadvantaged areas from the ordinance.
 In response, the city council directed staff to develop a citywide inclusionary housing program, without exempted or strategic areas.
 The need to establish a minimum project size threshold, and the benefits of the typical threshold of five or 10 units, or allowance of an in-lieu fee payment.  In response, the city council directed staff to complete a financial feasibility analysis to assess the minimum project size and calculate in-lieu fees.
 The fact inclusionary housing ordinances with greater than a 15 percent affordability requirement for rental housing projects, such as that envisioned by the city, are subject to HCD review.  In response, the city council directed staff to develop an inclusionary housing program with a 20 percent affordability requirement.
 The need to determine a split between income level allocations.  In response, the city council agreed that seven percent of the affordability requirement should be dedicated to very low income households, seven percent to low income households, and six percent to moderate income households.
 The value of alternative compliance options and requirement of those options for inclusionary housing ordinances that include rental housing.
 In response, the city council restated that the inclusionary housing program should not include alternative compliance options other than the required in-lieu fee option for rental housing.

PlaceWorks incorporated initial council direction and city feedback following the January 18, 2022 hearing into inclusionary housing components analyzed in this report. A series of residential development prototypes were developed in consultation with city staff. The characteristics of these development protypes were further honed to reflect current conditions using recent market-rate single family, condominium and rental housing projects in the city, as well as surveys of real estate sales and rental data obtained from real estate market aggregators.

The feasibility analysis process is detailed in Chapter 2, Methodology.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 246

2-8
This page intentionally left blank.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 247

3-1
Methodology
The financial feasibility impact of an inclusionary housing requirement on a market-rate project is the difference between financial performance of a fully market rate development project and one that provides the required number of below-market rate (BMR) units along with any density bonus and other incentives. Most commonly, this difference is measured as the difference in the rate of return that the developer would expect for the equity invested in the project. However, the difference can also be measured as the difference in the market-rate sales values or rents for units in the market-rate and the BMR development when holding the rate of return equal. It can also be measured as the difference in the residual land value (how much the developer can afford to pay to acquire the development site) between the market-rate and the BMR development projects, keeping the rate of return equal.

3.1 HOUSING NEED IN HOLLISTER
Hollister has a history of successfully planning for state-mandated housing requirements.

This feasibility analysis was prepared after approval of the 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) by the San Benito Council of Governments (SBCOG). The City’s RHNA directs that the City will need to plan for the construction of 826 Moderate, 678 Low and 846 Very Low Income housing units by 2031.

Inclusionary housing is not intended as a single solution to Hollister’s affordable housing needs.

Accomplishing state and local housing goals will require an additional combination of planning and zoning strategies, city policy decisions and regional coordination. However, an inclusionary housing program is one tool that will help the City to meet its RHNA.

This report summarizes the results of detailed financial feasibility analyses to assess the impact on feasibility of the requested inclusionary housing requirements on a series of prototypical housing projects. The analyses identify the following:
 The impact on feasibility of a 20 percent inclusionary requirement on a series of market-rate for-sale and rental residential development projects.
 The rate of density additional bonus (beyond that required by State law) and other development incentives required to achieve feasibility with a 20 percent inclusionary requirement.  In-lieu fees for rental housing projects that can be supported.

3.2 ANALYTICAL APPROACH
The basic structure of the analysis is the development and application of financial feasibility pro formas for a set of housing project prototypes reflecting current development trends in Hollister and the region.

The analyses include:

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 248

3-2

1. Creation of residential development prototypes that are representative of new and planned market- rate development in the City of Hollister.

2. Estimation of market-rate sales prices and rents for the prototypes.

3. Calculation of the sales prices and rents the reflect affordable housing payments.

4. Calculation of the percentage of units that could be designated as inclusionary housing units while maintaining project financial feasibility.

5. Projection of in-lieu fees that would be required to generate sufficient revenue to produce the defined percentages of Inclusionary Housing units.

3.2.1 DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPES
PlaceWorks developed for-sale and for-rent housing development prototypes that reflect recent development patterns in Hollister. The protypes were created using multiple inputs to ensure they are representative of local development patterns and provide for the most accurate analysis within the limitations of a financial feasibility assessment. These inputs include:
 Ongoing consultation with City staff regarding current project applications to the City and San Benito County, desired housing development types, and local policies related to housing production.  Evaluation and integration of recently-constructed and approved single- and multi-family for-sale projects and rental projects.
 Evaluation of housing project characteristics, densities and designs contained in multiple Hollister “Pipeline Project” lists obtained from city staff.
 Project data from City of Hollister Housing Element progress reports submitted to HCD.  Results of the Market Demand Analysis completed as part of the General Plan Update process.

Review of San Benito County Housing Affordability Agreement And Option To Purchase (HOME Loan) background documents. Details and components of each development prototype are included in Chapters 3 and 4.

3.2.2 MARKET SURVEY
PlaceWorks completed a market survey of home sales and rent prices to estimate achievable values of the development protypes. The PlaceWorks General Plan Update team surveyed Hollister rental apartments rates, complied from CoStar data, as part of the detailed Market Demand Analysis submitted to the City. PlaceWorks expanded this survey using data about rental prices in Hollister in April and May, 2022, from real estate aggregators Zillow and Trulia.

Beginning in January 2022, PlaceWorks surveyed home sales prices in Hollister by compiling Redfin sales data for single family homes, multifamily homes and condominiums.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 249

3-3

3.2.3 CALCULATION OF AFFORDBALE HOME PRICES & RENTS
PlaceWorks calculated affordable home values and rental process for inclusion in the pro form process.

These values were calculated using California Health & Safety Code (H&SC) Section 50052.5 calculation methodology.

Details and results of the calculation process are included in Chapter 3.

3.2.4 PRO FORMA ANALYSES
PlaceWorks prepared a series of dynamic pro formas for each development prototype to identify whether, and how, a 20-percent affordability requirement could be supported by market-rate housing projects.

Unlike static pro formas, dynamic pro formas rely on multi-year cash flow projections. This type of modeling requires a greater number of assumptions and inputs than static modelling. It allows for the most accurate evaluation of the feasibility of real estate projects. This approach facilitated calculation of the following metrics:
 Internal Rate of Return. PlaceWorks calculated Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to assess the feasibility of the for-sale development prototypes. IRR measures the developer’s return on investment with a discounted cash flow model. It is more complex and more accurate than a simple return on cost metric. It is based on the net cash flow for each year during the planning, construction, and sale (for a for-sale product) or operation (for a for-rent product). Equity investors typically use IRR because it allows them to compare different investment opportunities. In the initial years, a developer invests money into a project and then, in later years, receives return in the form of the sales value of the residential dwelling units, after repaying the construction loan. IRR can also be used with for-rent products (in which case the return is the annual net cash flow from operations and the ultimate sale of the project after a typically five-year holding period to capitalize on depreciation tax benefits). The key feasibility question is whether these later cash flows are large enough to pay back the initial investment plus a sufficient return to compensate for the investment risk. The IRR is essentially the rate that generates a $0 net present value for the series of cash flows. For real estate investments, an IRR of 15 percent is generally considered the threshold for a proposed project to be considered financially feasible.
 Cash-on-Cash Yield. PlaceWorks calculated Cash-on-Cash Yield to assess the financial feasibility of for- rent development prototypes. With for-rent residential projects, the developer may own and operate the project for an indeterminate number of years. IRR is a less effective evaluation metric because it requires a specific time horizon for the sale of the project and the final return. The cash-on-cash yield is an industry standard metric for rental projects, and it measures the net revenue relative to the developer’s investment for the first full year of occupancy. Specifically, it is calculated by dividing the expected net operating income (NOI), after debt service and taxes, by the required equity investment the developer puts up. For real estate investments, a cash-on-cash yield of six percent or more is generally considered the threshold for a proposed project to be considered financially feasible.  Residual Land Value. Residual land value is the amount that a developer can afford to pay to acquire a site for development and a achieve a financially feasible rate of return. Residual land value is most often used to compare two or more alternatives for a development site or two or more land use E.1.a
Packet Pg. 250

3-4
regulations by determine which generates the highest residual land value. However, a portion of the financial impact of inclusionary housing requirements can be absorbed by landowners in the form of lower residual land values (RLV). The impact of decreased RLV is reflected differently in financial feasibility analyses statewide, with no preferred direction. As detailed further in Chapters 3 and 4, PlaceWorks analyzed the financial feasibility of market-rate and BMR development prototypes assuming that the residual land value would remain the same.

3.2.5 SCENARIO ANALYSIS
The financial feasibility of each development prototype was analyzed under three different scenarios:

1. Fully Market Rate Scenario. This scenario consists of the density, number of units and unit type established in the original market-rate development prototype, without the introduction of affordability requirements.

2. Inclusionary Scenario. Under this scenario, seven percent of the development prototype’s housing units are dedicated to very low income households, seven percent to low income households, and six percent to moderate income households, for a total of 20 percent. In addition, this scenario includes the maximum number of new units allowed under California’s Density Bonus Law (Cal. Gov. Code Sections 65915 – 65918).

3. Local Bonus Scenario. This scenario includes additional market-rate units that would be needed, in addition to units allowed under the state density bonus law, to achieve financial feasibility with the inclusionary requirement. It is assumed that this additional density would be facilitated by a locally- adopted density bonus allowance.

Each prototype also includes a Base Scenario, which consists of the density, number of units and unit type established in the market rate scenario. Under this scenario, seven percent of the development prototype’s housing units are dedicated to very low income households, seven percent to low income households, and six percent to moderate income households, for a total of 20 percent. This scenario does not include state or local density bonuses. As such it is not included in the feasibility analyses. It is used to illustrate the development implications of changing density programs on a development project that complies with the IH ordinance, including changes in the number of market rate and below market rate units, and unit types.

3.2.6 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
PlaceWorks’ pro forma modelling includes sensitivity analyses that test the impact of a range of changes to key inputs. This type of analysis looks at the extent to which feasibility would be impacted under changing market or other assumptions. Inputs altered as part of the sensitivity analysis include:
 Rental rates
 Home values
 Project densities
 Combinations of housing project product type, such as multifamily units, single family homes, and townhouses
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 251

3-5

3.3 DENSITY BONUS UNITS
Most of the housing being built in Hollister today is owner-occupied. With ownership housing, the primary affordable housing challenge is that, even at a reduced price, each household must still have the ability to pay (a down payment and meet debt-to-income limits) and the willingness to pay (credit score) to qualify for a conventional mortgage. As a result, most very low-, low- and moderate income households cannot afford to buy the typical for-sale unit in Hollister.

Because households have to qualify for mortgage financing to buy a home (even one created under an inclusionary housing program), inclusionary housing programs tend to set the requirements for for-sale housing development for moderate income households. However, Hollister’s proposed program is intended to require very low-, low- and moderate income units. This combination of income levels impacts the manner in which for-sale projects may benefit from State Density Bonus law, which provides differing percentages for bonus market-rate housing units based on income level, as shown in Table 3.1.

TABLE 3.1: DENSITY BONUS AS PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN MARKET-RATE UNITS BY INCOME Percentage of Affordable Units Provided: 20% Affordable 10% Affordable 5% Affordable Household Income Class
Very Low Income 50% Unit Increase 32.5% Unit Increase 20% Unit Increase Low Income 35% Unit Increase 20% Unit Increase 0% Unit Increase Moderate Income 15% Unit Increase 5% Unit Increase 0% Unit Increase

Moreover, as explained in Section 1.5 of this report, there is no State density bonus for low income or moderate income affordable units if they comprise less than 10 percent of the total number of units in a project. Some inclusionary housing programs leave it to the developer to balance the number of affordable units by income classification in order to obtain the density bonus that best supports financial feasibility. However, there is no guarantee that the market in conjunction with an inclusionary housing program with such flexibility will produce housing for all income levels.

Cal. Gov. Code Section 65915 (n) allows the City to enact a local ordinance to provide higher density bonus percentages than described in Section 65915 (b) (1). In order to meet the dual objective of incentivizing the development of affordable home ownership units, and maximizing the chances for the program’s success, PlaceWorks recommends the City provide an increased density bonus for moderate income ownership units as part of the Inclusionary Housing program.

The ownership housing development analyses in Chapter 3 assume that the inclusionary housing program will require 7% of the total units in a project to be set aside for moderate income households, 7% of the total units in a to be set aside for low income households, and 6% to be set aside for very low income households. Based on this assumption, PlaceWorks prepared the following estimates:

1. The density bonus percentage required to support a 20% requirement from a financial perspective; and

2. The supportable in-lieu fee payment amounts.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 252

3-6
This page intentionally left blank.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 253

4-7
For-Sale Development Prototypes
This chapter inlcudes PlaceWorks’ analyses of the impact of a 20-percent affordability requirement on the financial feasibility of three prototypical for-sale residential development projects. Each prototype is representative of recent development activity in Hollister. The three protoypes include:
 Prototype 1: Low-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 4 dwelling units per acre.
 Prototype 2: Medium-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 10 dwelling units per acre.
 Prototype 3: High-density stacked-flat condominium project comprising a four-story building with 12 residential units over tuck-under parking, for a gross density of 40 units per acre.

Each protoype discussion includes a detailed project description, breakdowns of project revenue and costs, and analyses of financial feasibility feasibility under the three scenarios described in Section 2.7:

1. Fully Market Rate Scenario. This is the fully-market rate project.

2. Inclusionary Scenario. This scenario inlcudes the 20 percent affordability requirement and maximum number of new units allowed under State Density Bonus Law.

3. Local Bonus Scenario. This scenario includes additional market-rate units that would be needed, in addition to units allowed under the state density bonus law, to achieve financial feasibility with the inclusionary requirement.

This chapter opens with a discussion of State affordability classifications and metrics. It concludes with a discussion of the potential need for disposition requirements in the inclusionary housing program, to establish purchaser qualifications and affordable unit resale restrictions.

4.1 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PAYMENTS FOR FOR-SALE

HOUSING
The housing payment considered to be affordable for a given household is determined by household size and income. The calculated affordable housing payment is unrelated to the size (square footage) of the dwelling units (provided it has the appropriate number of bedrooms), the type of housing (single-family detached, townhouse, or condo), or the market-rate price of the unit. Calculated affordable housing payments for for-sale housing are provided in the following sections.

4.1.1 HOUSING INCOME CLASSIFICATIONS
There are several related but distinct income classifications used for public programs. This analysis is based on the most common classification for housing programs, the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Income Limits. Table 4.2 provides the HCD income limits for San Benito E.1.a
Packet Pg. 254

4-8
County for 2022. The data indicate that maximum income that a household with a given number of people can earn and be included in each income classification.

TABLE 4.2: HCD INCOME LIMITS BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND INCOME CLASSIFICATION; SAN BENITO COUNTY; 2022 Number of People: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Very low 36,800 42,050 47,300 52,550 56,800 61,000 65,200 69,400 73,604 Low 58,900 67,300 75,700 84,100 90,850 97,600 104,300 111,050 117,778 Moderate 88,250 100,900 113,500 126,100 136,200 146,300 156,350 166,450 176,538 Countywide AMI 105,100

Thus, a 3-person household with an annual income of $46,000 would be classified as very low income, while a 3-person family with an annual income of $48,000 would be classified as low income. When purchasing a home with some sort of public subsidy, support, or write-down, the household’s actual income is used to determine the affordable housing payment. For planning purposes, the maximum income for each income classification is used to determine the affordable housing payment and, thus, the affordable sales price.

4.1.2 AFFORDABLE-HOUSING SALES PRICES
The price that may be charged for affordable owner-occupied housing is based on annual income and household size. The affordable sales prices are calculated in Table 4.3 for very low income, low income, and moderate income households.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 255

4-9
TABLE 4.3: CALCULATION OF AFFORDABLE-HOUSING SALES PRICE BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND INCOME CLASSIFICATION (ALL DATA IN 2022 DOLLARS); HOLLISTER; 2022
Household Size: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Very low income Households
Annual income limit 36,800 42,050 47,300 52,550 56,800 61,000 65,200 69,400 73,604 Affordable housing cost
(@30%) 11,040 12,615 14,190 15,765 17,040 18,300 19,560 20,820 22,081 Annual utility allowance 3,216 3,288 3,624 3,972 3,972 4,332 4,560 4,560 4,716 Annual housing
affordable payment 7,824 9,327 10,566 11,793 13,068 13,968 15,000 16,260 17,365 Monthly housing
affordable payment 652 777 881 983 1,089 1,164 1,250 1,355 1,447 Other housing costs 304 363 411 459 508 543 583 632 675 Mortgage payment 348 415 470 524 581 621 667 723 772
Affordable purchase price 64,479 76,865 87,076 97,188 107,695 115,112 123,617 134,001 143,109 Low income Households
Annual income 58,900 67,300 75,700 84,100 90,850 97,600 104,300 111,050 117,778 Affordable housing cost
(@30%) 17,670 20,190 22,710 25,230 27,255 29,280 31,290 33,315 35,333 Annual utility allowance 3,216 3,288 3,624 3,972 3,972 4,332 4,560 4,560 4,716 Annual housing
affordable payment 14,454 16,902 19,086 21,258 23,283 24,948 26,730 28,755 30,617 Monthly housing
affordable payment 1,205 1,409 1,591 1,772 1,940 2,079 2,228 2,396 2,551 Other housing costs 562 657 742 827 905 970 1,039 1,118 1,190 Mortgage payment 643 751 848 945 1,035 1,109 1,188 1,278 1,361 Affordable purchase price 119,117 139,292 157,290 175,190 191,878 205,600 220,286 236,974 252,322 Moderate income Households
Annual income 88,250 100,900 113,500 126,100 136,200 146,300 156,350 166,450 176,538 Affordable housing cost
(@30%) 26,475 30,270 34,050 37,830 40,860 43,890 46,905 49,935 52,961 Annual utility allowance 3,216 3,288 3,624 3,972 3,972 4,332 4,560 4,560 4,716 Annual housing
affordable payment 23,259 26,982 30,426 33,858 36,888 39,558 42,345 45,375 48,245 Monthly housing
affordable payment 1,938 2,249 2,536 2,822 3,074 3,297 3,529 3,781 4,020 Other housing costs 904 1,049 1,183 1,316 1,434 1,538 1,646 1,764 1,876 Mortgage payment 1,034 1,199 1,353 1,505 1,640 1,758 1,882 2,017 2,145 Affordable purchase price 191,681 222,362 250,745 279,028 303,999 326,003 348,971 373,942 397,597 Notes to Table 4.3:

1. Data for annual income limit by household size and income classification is from Table 4.2.

2. The total payment for housing costs for owner-occupied housing is considered to be 30 percent of household income.

3. Annual utility allowance data are based on the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Cruz 2022 Hollister and San Juan Bautista Utility Allowances.

4. The annual housing affordable payment is the affordable housing cost less the utility allowance. The monthly housing affordable payment is the annual payment divided by 12.

5. Other housing costs assume a 5 percent down payment and a 95 percent loan to value ratio and include 1.5 percent taxes, 1 percent annual private mortgage insurance, and 0.57 percent annual homeowners’ insurance.

6. The mortgage payment is the monthly housing affordable payment less other housing costs. The affordable purchase price is based on the mortgage payment and assumes a 30-year fixed rate mortgage with a 5 percent down payment and a 5.5 percent annual percentage rate.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 256

4-10

4.2 FOR-SALE DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPES AND ANALYSES
This section describes the three for-sale development prototypes analyzed in this report, and the results of their financial feasibility analyses.

PlaceWorks defined three development prototypes for for-sale housing based on our review of recently constructed and permitted housing projects in Hollister:
 Prototype 1: Low-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 4 dwelling units per acre.
 Prototype 2: Medium-density single-family detached housing subdivision at a gross density of 10 dwelling units per acre.
 Prototype 3: High-density stacked-flat condominiums.

These prototypes are intended to reflect generalized development patterns that are typical and/or allowable under current planning and zoning and to provide a generalized indication of the financial feasibility impacts of a 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement. The prototypes do not reflect any particular lot or parcel nor location in the city. The financial feasibility of any prototypes on a specific site should be expected to vary from the generalized analysis provided below.

4.2.1 PROTOTYPE 1: LOW-DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED

HOUSING SUBDIVISION

PROTOTYPE DESCRIPTION
This prototype represents the most common form of development in Hollister. The theoretical site is 55.0 acres in size. The base scenario includes 220 houses, at a gross density of 4.0 units per acre. Table 4.4 shows the types of housing and estimated sales values.

TABLE 4.4: PROTOTYPE 1 HOUSING SIZES AND SALES VALUES
Unit Type Size (sq. ft.)
Market-Rate Sales
Value
Below-Market-
Rate Sales Value Difference
3-Bedroom 1,480 977,500 185,700 -792,000 -81.0%
4-Bedroom 1,970 1,058,000 208,000 -850,000 -80.3%
5-Bedroom 2,270 1,150,000 216,000 -934,000 -81.2%
6-Bedroom 3,470 1,380,000 264,000 -1,116,000 -80.8%
Notes to Table 4.4:

1. Unit types, sizes, and market-rate sales values are PlaceWorks assumptions based on our assessment of the current market.

2. Below market-rate sales values are based on the data in Table 4.3, assuming that 3-bedroom units are a mix of 3- and 4- person households, 4-bedroom units are 5-person households, 5-bedroom units are a mix of 7- and 8-person households, and 6-bedroom units are 9-person households.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 257

4-11
As with all five analyses conducted for this report, PlaceWorks has assessed the development implications of the base development scenario, an inclusionary housing scenario and a local bonus scenario for this prototype and compared the inclusionary housing scenario and local bonus scenario to the fully market rate scenario. The number of units in each of the alternatives is provided in Table 4.5, while a summary of the alternatives is shown in Table 4.6.
 The base development scenario includes 220 total housing units, composed of 46 BMR units and 174 market-rate units. Per the 20 percent inclusionary requirement, seven percent of the units (16 units) are for very low income households, seven percent (16 units) are for low income households, and six percent (14 units) are for moderate income households.
 The inclusionary scenario includes a 25% density bonus. The low- and moderate income housing units in the inclusionary housing scenario are both less than 10 percent and, therefore, earn no density bonus under State density bonus law. The seven percent of housing units affordable to very low income households would entitle the inclusionary housing alternative to a density bonus of 25 percent, or an additional 55 market-rate units. This brings the total potential size of the inclusionary housing scenario to 275 units. This is 5.0 units per acre on the hypothetical 55-acre site.  The local bonus scenario would provide an additional 39 percent density bonus on top of the inclusionary scenario. As discussed below, this density bonus has been calculated to be the number that is necessary to make 20-percent inclusionary housing financially feasible. This creates an additional 86 market-rate units, on top of the 55 units allowed under existing State and local density bonus law, for a total of 361 units, or 6.6 units per acre on the hypothetical 55-acre site.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 258

4-12
TABLE 4.5: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Unit Type
Base Development
Scenario Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local Bonus Scenario Total Number of Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
3-Bedroom 70 15 73 88 15 100 115
4-Bedroom 70 15 73 88 15 100 115
5-Bedroom 50 10 52 62 10 72 82
6-Bedroom 30 6 31 37 6 43 49
Total 220 46 229 275 46 315 361

TABLE 4.6: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Base Development Scenario Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario Market rate units 174 229 315
Below market-rate units 46 46 46
Total number of units 220 275 361
Site area (acres) 55 55 55
Gross density (du/acre) 4.0 5.0 6.6

PROJECT REVENUE
In the following discussion of project revenues, costs and feasibility, the performance of the inclusionary housing scenario and local bonus scenarios are compared to a fully market-rate version of the protype.

The estimated project revenue for Prototype 1 is presented in Table 4.7. The only income for each of the scenarios is the sales of the completed housing units. In the inclusionary housing scenario, the average per unit sales value, $9474,000 (across all market-rate and BMR units), is 13.6 percent lower than the average in a fully market rate project. With the additional market-rates units in the local-bonus scenario, the average per unit sales value of $983,000 is higher than in the inclusionary housing scenario but still

10.4 percent below the market rate average.

TABLE 4.7: PROTOTYPE 1 PROJECT INCOME
Fully Market Rate Project Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local Bonus Scenario Average sales value 1,097,000 947,000 983,000
Gross sales value 241,000,000 260,000,000 355,000,000
Less sales commission -14,480,000 -15,630,000 -21,300,000 Total Net Sales Value 227,000,000 245,000,000 334,000,000 Notes to Table 4.7:

1. The average sales value is based on the sales values in Table 4.4 and the number of units in Table 4.5. The gross sales value is the average unit value multiplied by the total number of units,

2. The analysis assumes a 6.0 percent sales commission. The total net sales value is the gross sales value less the sales commission.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 259

4-13

PROJECT COSTS
Estimated project costs are provided in Table 4.8. The overall cost increases with additional units, from $188 million for the fully market rate project to just over $224 million for the inclusionary housing scenario and over $292 million for the local-bonus scenario. However, the cost per unit decreases with fixed costs, such as land acquisition, spread across more units, and less roadway per unit. The analysis estimates the per unit cost at $854,000 for the fully market rate project, $834,000 for the inclusionary housing scenario, and $810,000 for the local-bonus scenario.

Table 4.8: Prototype 1 Project Costs
Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus
Scenario
Land Cost
Estimated property value 10,700,000 10,700,000 10,700,000 Due diligence 535,000 535,000 535,000
Estimated land acquisition cost 11,240,000 11,240,000 11,240,000 Hard Costs
Site work 12,510,000 12,510,000 12,510,000
Building construction 123,000,000 153,500,000 301,700,000 Circulation and parking 4,690,000 6,690,000 7,490,000
Landscaping 5,480,000 4,990,000 4,220,000
Hard cost subtotal 145,700,000 177,700,000 226,000,000
Soft Costs
Design, entitlement, and other soft costs
@10.0% 14,570,000 17,770,000 22,600,000
Contingency @10.0% 14,570,000 17,770,000 22,600,000
Development impact fees 11,930,000 14,910,000 19,570,000 Marketing 1,210,000 1,300,000 1,770,000
Soft costs subtotal 42,300,000 51,700,000 66,500,000
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 188,000,000 224,400,000 292,500,000 - per unit 854,000 834,000 810,000
Notes to Table 4.8:

1. The estimated property value is a PlaceWorks estimate based on our analysis of sales data, asking prices, and residual land values. The analysis assumes a 5 percent of land cost allowance for due diligence activities related to land acquisition. The cash flow model assumes monthly option payments of 1 percent of the estimated property value during the entitlement period, but the option payments are part of the overall payment for land acquisition rather than an additional cost.

2. Building construction costs are calculated on a per square foot basis for finished floor area and a separate square foot basis for garages. The per square foot costs are taken from Craftsman Book Company’s 2022 National Building Cost Manual, with the source’s recommended adjustments for local cost differential. As noted in the source, the per square foot cost estimates include all construction costs: labor, materials, equipment, plans, building permit, supervision, overhead, and profit.

3. Development impact fees are calculated as $54,209 per dwelling unit. The analysis assumes that development impact fees are charged to market-rate and below-market-rate units. The city could waive development impact fees for the below- market-rate units, which could lessen the need for other subsidies, primarily the extent of the additional density bonus.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 260

4-14

FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Table 4.9 summarizes the financial feasibility of each scenario alternative. The analysis finds that the fully market rate project is financially feasible, generating an IRR of 17.4 percent. This is to be expected, however, because this is the type of development that has been occurring in Hollister. Simply requiring 20 percent affordable housing and relying on the State Density Bonus Law to provide the incentive is not financially feasible with the assumed income-class distribution of affordable housing. This inclusionary housing scenario would require an additional $15.4 million subsidy in order to be feasible.

The local bonus scenario was created to be financially feasible; ultimately providing the subsidy identified above. If the city were to provide an additional 39 percent density bonus on top of the 25 percent bonus allowed under state law, then the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement becomes feasible, generating an expected 15.2 percent IRR. Thus, the local bonus scenario meets the requirements for financial feasibility, and its parameters could be included in an inclusionary housing ordinance.

TABLE 4.9: PROTOTYPE 1 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY SUMMARY
Fully Market Rate Project Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario Development cost 188,000,000 229,400,000 292,500,000
Financing cost 13,170,000 14,910,000 18,460,000
Total project cost 201,000,000 244,000,000 311,000,000
Construction loan amount 161,700,000 197,300,000 252,500,000 Required equity 39,500,000 47,000,000 58,400,000
Net project income 9,510,000 -10,490,000 11,670,000
Project IRR 17.4% -18.6% 15.2%
Surplus/(Gap) w/15% IRR 1,041,000 -15,410,000 107,000
Residual land value w/15% IRR 11,740,000 -4,710,000 10,810,000 Notes to Table 4.9:

1. Financing cost includes construction loan fees of 2.5 percent and carried interest for a 6.85 annual percentage rate, based on data from realtyrates.com. The total project costs are the development cost, from Table 3.6, plus the financing cost.

2. The construction loan amount is based on 50 percent of land acquisition and 84 percent of other construction costs, based on data from realtyrates.com.

3. The IRR is an annual rate of return based on monthly cash flow, assuming a 6-month entitlement period, 4 months of site work, 18 months of construction, and 3 months to complete sales.

The analysis considered other alternatives to achieve financial feasibility. Relying on a reduction in the residual land value (i.e., expecting landowners to absorb some of the cost of providing affordable housing) is, on its own, insufficient. Even if the land were available at no cost, the inclusionary housing scenario would still need a further subsidy of $4.7 million in order to be feasible. On the other hand, the local bonus scenario creates a residual land value that is close to the residual land value for the base development scenario, which is a further indication of feasibility.

The analysis also assessed changes in market-rate sales value. If the market could support an 8.5 percent in the price for new housing, the inclusionary housing scenario would be financially feasible. As noted in E.1.a
Packet Pg. 261

4-15
Chapter 2, this analysis is based on current housing prices, so an increase in sales prices for market-rate units is not assumed in the feasibility assessment.

4.2.2 PROTOTYPE 2: MEDIUM-DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED

HOUSING SUBDIVISION

PROTOTYPE DESCRIPTION
This prototype is similar to prototype 1. It is a single-family detached residential subdivision, but it is developed at the highest gross density allowed. The base scenario includes 220 houses on a 22-acre site, for a gross density of 10.0 units per acre. Table 4.10 shows the types of housing and estimated sales values. As will be discussed, the local-bonus scenario includes market rate townhouses, which are required to achieve the increase in density that is needed to make an inclusionary requirement feasible for this prototype.

Table 4.10: Prototype 2 Housing Sizes and Sales Values
Unit Type Size (sq. ft.)
Market-Rate Sales
Value
Below-Market-
Rate Sales Value Difference
Single-Family Detached Housing
3-Bedroom 1,480 879,750 185,667 -694,083 -78.9%
4-Bedroom 1,970 952,200 207,897 -744,303 -78.2%
5-Bedroom 2,270 1,035,000 215,668 -819,332 -79.2%
Townhouses
3-Bed Townhouse 1,408 792,000 185,667 -606,333 -76.6%
Notes to Table 4.10:

1. Unit types, sizes, and market-rate sales values are PlaceWorks assumptions based on our assessment of the current market.

2. Below market-rate sales values are based on the data in Table 4.3, assuming that 3-bedroom units are a mix of 3- and 4- person households, 4-bedroom units are 5-person households, and 5-bedroom units are a mix of 7- and 8-person households.

As with all five analyses conducted for this report, PlaceWorks has assessed the development implications of the base development scenario, an inclusionary housing scenario and a local bonus scenario for this prototype and compared the inclusionary housing scenario and local bonus scenario to the fully market rate scenario. The number of units in each of the alternatives is provided in Table 4.11, while a summary of the alternatives is shown in Table 4.12.
 The base development scenario includes 220 total housing units, composed of 46 BMR units and 174 market-rate units. Per the 20 percent inclusionary requirement, seven percent of the units (16 units) are for very low income households, seven percent (16 units) are for low income households, and six percent (14 units) are for moderate income households..  The inclusionary scenario includes a 25% density bonus. The low- and moderate income housing units in the inclusionary housing scenario are both less than 10 percent and, therefore, earn no density bonus under State density bonus law. The seven percent of housing units affordable to very low income households would entitle the inclusionary housing alternative to a density bonus of 25 E.1.a
Packet Pg. 262

4-16
percent, or an additional 55 market-rate units. This brings the total project size to 275 units, or 12.5 units per acre on the hypothetical 22-acre site.
 The local bonus scenario would provide an additional 6.8 percent density bonus on top of the base development scenario. As discussed below, this density bonus has been calculated to be the number that is necessary to make 20-percent inclusionary housing financially feasible. This creates an additional 15 market rate, on top of the 55 units allowed under existing State and local density bonus law, for a total of 290 units, or 13.2 units per acre on the hypothetical 22-acre site.

TABLE 4.11: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Unit Type
Base Development
Scenario Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local Bonus Scenario Total Number of
Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number
of Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number
of Units
3-Bedroom 110 23 115 138 18 92 110
4-Bedroom 90 19 94 113 14 76 90
5-Bedroom 20 4 20 24 3 17 20
3-Bed Townhouse 11 59 70
Total 220 46 229 275 46 244 290

TABLE 4.12: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Base Development Scenario Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario Market rate units 174 229 244
Below market-rate units 46 46 46
Total number of units 220 275 290
Site area (acres) 22 22 22
Gross density (du/acre) 10.0 12.5 13.2

PROJECT REVENUE
The estimated project revenue for Prototype 2 is presented in Table 4.13. The only income for each of the scenarios is the sales of the completed housing units. In the inclusionary housing scenario, the average per unit sales value, $800,000 (across all market-rate and BMR units), is 13.4 percent lower than the average in a fully market rate version of the project. With the additional market-rate units in the local- bonus scenario, which includes 70 lower-priced townhouses that are required to achieve the gross density of 13.2 units per acre, the average per unit sales value ($779,000), is 16.3 percent below the average in the fully market rate scenario.

TABLE 4.13: PROTOTYPE 2 PROJECT INCOME
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 263

4-17
Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Average sales value 924,000 800,000 779,000
Gross sales value 203,000,000 220,000,000 226,000,000
Less sales commission -12,200,000 -13.190,000 -13,560,000 Total Net Sales Value 191,000,000 207,000,000 212,000,000 Notes to Table 4.13:

1. The average sales value is based on the sales values in Table 4.8 and the number of units in Table 3.9. The gross sales value is the average unit value multiplied by the total number of units,

2. The analysis assumes a 6.0 percent sales commission. The total net sales value is the gross sales value less the sales commission.

PROJECT COSTS
The estimated project costs are provided in Table 4.14. The overall cost increases with additional units, rising from just over $152 million for the fully market rate version, to just under $188 million for the inclusionary housing scenario and over $189 million for the local bonus scenario. However, the cost per unit decreases with fixed costs, such as land acquisition, spread across more units, and less roadway per unit with smaller lots sizes. The analysis estimates the per unit cost at $691,000 for the fully market rate scenario, $683,000 for the inclusionary housing scenario, and $652,000 for the local bonus scenario.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 264

4-18

TABLE 4.14: PROTOTYPE 2 PROJECT COSTS
Fully Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus
Scenario
Land Cost
Estimated property value 4,280,000 4,280,000 4,280,000
Due diligence 214,000 214,000 214,000
Estimated land acquisition cost 4,490,000 4,490,000 4,490,000 Hard Costs
Site work 6,810,000 6,990,000 6,990,000
Building construction 105,000,000 131,100,000 132,100,000 Circulation and parking 2,810,000 4,010,000 4,100,000
Landscaping 1,390,000 1,080,000 1,020,000
Hard cost subtotal 116,000,000 143,100,000 144,200,000
Soft Costs
Design, entitlement, and other soft costs @10.0% 11,600,000 14,310,000 14,420,000 Contingency @10.0% 11,600,000 14,310,000 14,420,000
Development impact fees 11,930,000 14,910,000 14,950,000 Marketing 1,020,000 1,100,000 1,130,000
Soft costs subtotal 36,100,000 44,600,000 44,900,000
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 152,100,000 187,800,000 189,100,000 - per unit 691,000 683,000 652,000
Notes to Table 4.14:

1. The estimated property value is a PlaceWorks estimate based on our analysis of sales data, asking prices, and residual land values. The analysis assumes a 5 percent of land cost allowance for due diligence activities related to land acquisition. The cash flow model assumes monthly option payments of 1 percent of the estimated property value during the entitlement period, but the option payments are part of the overall payment for land acquisition rather than an additional cost.

2. Building construction costs are calculated on a per square foot basis for finished floor area and a separate square foot basis for garages. The per square foot costs are taken from Craftsman Book Company’s 2022 National Building Cost Manual, with the source’s recommended adjustments for local cost differential. As noted in the source, the per square foot cost estimates include all construction costs: labor, materials, equipment, plans, building permit, supervision, overhead, and profit.

3. Development impact fees are calculated as $54,209 per single-family dwelling unit and $43,259 per townhouse unit. The analysis assumes that development impact fees are charged to market-rate and below-market-rate units. The city could waive development impact fees for the below-market-rate units, which could lessen the need for other subsidies, primarily the extent of the additional density bonus.

FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Table 4.15 summarizes the financial feasibility of a fully market-rate version of the project and each scenario. The analysis finds that the market-rate project is financially feasible, generating an IRR of 47.3 percent. This is a very lucrative return, but it is not surprising given the density the scenario achieves.

Simply requiring 20 percent affordable housing and relying on the State Density Bonus Law to provide the E.1.a
Packet Pg. 265

4-19
incentive is not financially feasible with the assumed income-class distribution of affordable housing. The inclusionary housing scenario would be feasible if the cost to acquire the land were reduced to $720,000.

The local-bonus scenario was created to be financially feasible. If the city were to provide an additional

6.8percent density bonus on top of the 25 percent bonus allowed under state law, then the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement becomes feasible, generating an expected 15.3 percent IRR. Thus, the local bonus scenario meets the requirements for financial feasibility, and its parameters could be included in an inclusionary housing ordinance.

TABLE 4.15: PROTOTYPE 2 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY SUMMARY

Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Development cost 152,100,000 187,800,000 189,100,000
Financing cost 10,190,000 11,780,000 11,830,000
Total project cost 162,000,000 200,000,000 201,000,000
Construction loan amount 132,600,000 163,400,000 164,500,000 Required equity 29,700,000 36,200,000 36,400,000
Net project income 20,140,000 2,840,000 7,150,000
Project IRR 47.3% 6.3% 15.3%
Surplus/(Gap) w/15% IRR 7,461,000 -3,206,000 95,000
Residual land value w/15% IRR 11,740,000 1,070,000 4,370,000 Notes to Table 4.15:

1. Financing cost includes construction loan fees of 2.5 percent and carried interest for a 6.85 annual percentage rate, based on data from realtyrates.com. The total project costs are the development cost, from Table 3.6, plus the financing cost.

2. The construction loan amount is based on 50 percent of land acquisition and 84 percent of other construction costs, based on data from realtyrates.com.

3. The IRR is an annual rate of return based on monthly cash flow, assuming a 6-month entitlement period, 4 months of site work, 18 months of construction, and 3 months to complete sales.

The analysis considered other alternatives to achieve financial feasibility. Relying on a reduction in the residual land value (i.e., expecting landowners to absorb some of the cost of providing affordable housing) is theoretically possible, but the magnitude of the needed price reduction makes it unlikely.

The analysis also assessed changes in market-rate sales value. If the market could support a 2.4 percent increase in the price for new housing, the inclusionary housing scenario would be financially feasible. As noted in Chapter 2, this analysis is based on current housing prices, so an increase in sales prices for market rate market-rate units is not assumed in the feasibility assessment.

4.2.3 PROTOTYPE 3: HIGH DENSITY CONDOMINIUM SCENARIO

PROTOTYPE DESCRIPTION
This prototype is for a small-scale but high-density condominium project. It is a single building, with four stories of residential flats over tuck-under parking. The site is 0.30 acres in size. The base scenario E.1.a
Packet Pg. 266

4-20
includes 12 residential units, for a gross density of 40 units per acre. Table 3.16 shows the types of housing and estimated sales values.

TABLE 4.16: PROTOTYPE 3 HOUSING UNIT SIZES AND SALES VALUES Unit Type Size (sq. ft.)
Market-Rate
Sales Value
Below-Market-
Rate Sales Value Difference
1-bedroom/1-bath 550 260,000 155,399 -104,601 -40.2%
2-bedroom/2-bath 800 364,000 168,113 -195,887 -53.8%
Notes to Table 4.16:

1. Unit types, sizes, and market-rate sales values are PlaceWorks assumptions based on our assessment of the current market.

2. Below market-rate sales values are based on the data in Table 3.3, assuming that 1-bedroom units are a mix of 1- and 2- person households, and 2-bedroom units are 3-person households.

As with all five analyses conducted for this report, PlaceWorks has assessed the development implications of the base development scenario, an inclusionary housing scenario and a local bonus scenario for this prototype and compared the inclusionary housing scenario and local bonus scenario to the fully market rate scenario. The number of units in each of the alternatives is provided in Table 4.17, while a summary of the alternatives is shown in Table 3.18.
 The base development scenario includes 12 housing units, composed of three BMR units and nine market-rate units. The 20 percent inclusionary requirement would require 2.4 affordable units total, including seven percent very low income units (0.84, rounded up to one unit), seven percent low income units (0.84, rounded up to one unit) and six percent moderate income units (0.72, rounded up to one unit). This is 40 units per acre on the hypothetical 0.30-acre site. low income.  The inclusionary scenario includes a 27.5% density bonus. This is larger than the previous two prototypes because of the reduced number of units in Prototype 3. The moderate and low income housing units in the inclusionary housing scenario are less than 10 percent and, therefore, earn no density bonus under State density bonus law.very low. The 8.3 percent of housing units affordable to very low income households would entitle the inclusionary housing alternative to a density bonus of

27.5 percent, or an additional three market-rate units. This brings the total potential size of the inclusionary housing scenario to 15 units. This is 50 units per acre on the hypothetical 0.30-acre site.  The local bonus scenario would provide an additional 55.8 percent density bonus on top of the base development scenario. As discussed below, this density bonus has been calculated to be the number that is necessary to make 20-percent inclusionary housing financially feasible. This creates an additional seven market-rate units, on top of the three units allowed under existing State and local density bonus law, for a total of 22 units, or 73.3 units per acre on the hypothetical 0.3-acre site.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 267

4-21

TABLE 4.17: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Unit Type
Base
Development
Scenario Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local Bonus Scenario Total Number
of Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
1-bedroom/1-bath 6 1 6 7 1 10 11
2-bedroom/2-bath 6 2 6 8 2 9 11
Total 12 3 12 15 3 19 22

TABLE 4.18: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO

Base Development
Scenario
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Market rate units 9 12 19
Below market-rate units 3 3 3
Total number of units 12 15 22
Site area (acres) 0.30 0.30 0.30
Gross density (du/acre) 40.0 50.0 73.0

PROJECT REVENUE
The estimated project revenue for Prototype 3 is presented in Table 4.19. The only income for each of the scenarios is the sales of the completed housing units. In the inclusionary housing scenario, the average per unit sales value, $300,000 (across all market-rate and BMR units), is 12.3 percent lower than the average in in a fully market rate version of the project. With the addition of market-rate units in the local- bonus scenario, the average per unit sales value of $310,000 is 9.4 percent below the market rate.

TABLE 4.19: PROTOTYPE 3 PROJECT INCOME
Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Average sales value 342,000 300,000 310,000
Gross sales value 4,100,000 4,500,000 6,830,000
Less sales commission -246,000 -270,000 -410,000
Total Net Sales Value 3,860,000 4,230,000 6,420,000
Notes to Table 4.19:

1. The average sales value is based on the sales values in Table 3.14 and the number of units in Table 3.15. The gross sales value is the average unit value multiplied by the total number of units,

2. The analysis assumes a 6.0 percent sales commission. The total net sales value is the gross sales value less the sales commission.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 268

4-22

PROJECT COSTS
Estimated project costs are provided in Table 4.20. The overall cost increases with additional units, rising from $3.1 million for the fully market rate project, to $4.1 million for the inclusionary housing scenario and $5.78 million for the local-bonus scenario. With a stacked-flat condominium, there are fewer opportunities to spread costs across more units and lower costs with less road frontage constructed.

Unlike the previous two scenarios, the cost per unit increases somewhat with an increasing number of units. The analysis estimates the per unit cost at $259,000 for the base scenario, $272,000 for the inclusionary housing scenario, and $263,000 for the local-bonus scenario.

TABLE 4.20: PROTOTYPE 3 PROJECT COSTS
Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Land Cost
Estimated property value 48,600 48,600 48,600
Due diligence 2,430 2,430 2,430
Estimated land acquisition cost 51,100 51,100 51,100
Hard Costs
Site work 108,900 108,900 108,900
Building construction 2,040,000 2,750,000 3,930,000
Circulation and parking 14,960 23,000 34,500
Landscaping 24,000 19,410 13,070
Hard cost subtotal 2,190,000 2,900,000 4,090,000
Soft Costs
Design, entitlement, and other soft
costs @10.0% 219,000 290,000 409,000
Contingency @10.0% 219,000 290,000 409,000
Development impact fees 458,000 577,000 839,000
Marketing 20,500 22,800 34,100
Soft costs subtotal 917,000 1,180,000 1,691,000
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 3,110,000 4,080,000 5,780,000 - per unit 259,000 272,000 263,000
Notes to Table 4.20:

1. The estimated property value is a PlaceWorks estimate based on our analysis of sales data, asking prices, and residual land values. The analysis assumes a 5 percent of land cost allowance for due diligence activities related to land acquisition. The cash flow model assumes monthly option payments of 1 percent of the estimated property value during the entitlement period, but the option payments are part of the overall payment for land acquisition rather than an additional cost.

2. Building construction costs are calculated on a per square foot basis for finished floor area and a separate square foot basis for garages. The per square foot costs are taken from Craftsman Book Company’s 2022 National Building Cost Manual, with the source’s recommended adjustments for local cost differential. As noted in the source, the per square foot cost estimates include all construction costs: labor, materials, equipment, plans, building permit, supervision, overhead, and profit.

3. Development impact fees are calculated as $33,024 per one-bedroom unit and $43,259 per two-bedroom unit. The analysis assumes that development impact fees are charged to market-rate and below-market-rate units. The city could waive development impact fees for the below-market-rate units, which could lessen the need for other subsidies, primarily the extent of the additional density bonus.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 269

4-23

FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Table 4.21 summarizes the financial feasibility of each scenario. The analysis finds that the fully market rate project is financially feasible, generating an IRR of 46.5 percent. This is a very lucrative return, but it is not surprising given the density the scenario achieves. Simply requiring 20 percent affordable housing and relying on the State Density Bonus Law to provide the incentive is not financially feasible with the assumed income-class distribution of affordable housing. This scenario would require a total subsidy of $248,000 to be financially feasible.

The local-bonus scenario was created to be financially feasible; ultimately providing the subsidy identified above. If the city were to provide an additional 55.8 percent density bonus on top of the 27.5 percent bonus allowed under state law, then the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement becomes feasible, generating an expected 17.3 percent IRR. Thus, the local bonus scenario meets the requirements for financial feasibility, and its parameters could be included in an inclusionary housing ordinance.

TABLE 4.21: PROTOTYPE 3 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY SUMMARY

Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Development cost 3,110,000 4,080,000 5,570,000
Financing cost 219,000 270,000 363,000
Total project cost 3,330,000 4,350,000 5,940,000
Construction loan amount 2,750,000 3,590,000 4,910,000
Required equity 583,000 759,000 1,026,000
Net project income 396,000 -172,600 232,000
Project IRR 46.5% -19.4% 17.3%
Surplus/(Gap) w/15% IRR 213,000 -248,000 25,131
Residual land value w/15% IRR 261,000 -200,000 73,800
Notes to Table 4.21:

1. Financing cost includes construction loan fees of 2.5 percent and carried interest for a 6.85 annual percentage rate, based on data from realtyrates.com. The total project costs are the development cost, from Table 3.6, plus the financing cost.

2. The construction loan amount is based on 50 percent of land acquisition and 84 percent of other construction costs, based on data from realtyrates.com.

3. The IRR is an annual rate of return based on monthly cash flow, assuming a 6-month entitlement period, 4 months of site work, 18 months of construction, and 3 months to complete sales.

The analysis considered other alternatives to achieve financial feasibility. Relying on a reduction in the residual land value (i.e., expecting landowners to absorb some of the cost of providing affordable housing) is not possible the inclusionary housing scenario would require a subsidy larger that the estimated land cost.

The analysis also assessed changes in market-rate sales value. If the market could support a 6.8 percent increase in the price for new housing, the inclusionary housing scenario would be financially feasible. As noted in Chapter 2, this analysis is based on current housing prices, so an increase in sales prices for market rate market-rate units is not assumed in the feasibility assessment.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 270

4-24

4.3 DISPOSITION REQUIREMENTS
The inclusionary program will likely require that households purchasing an affordable unit qualify based on income and that the sales price qualify as affordable to that household. The program will also have to identify what restriction, if any, will be applied to future resales of these affordable units. Different state and federal programs have different requirements.

We recommend that the city’s ordinance restrict future resales so that the purchasing household also be income-qualified and that the sales price represent an affordable housing payment for the purchasing household. We further recommend that this restriction be enforced by a deed restriction for a period of 45 years. This would be consistent with some federal affordable housing programs, but it is worth noting that it is unlikely that federal funding would be involved with mixed-income inclusionary housing projects.

As an alternative, the City could consider using provisions similar to the State Density Bonus Law. The original purchaser would still have to be income-qualified and the sales price would have to be qualified as affordable to the purchasing household. The purchasing household would not be restricted from selling the property in the future at then market-rates or to selling to households that are not qualified as low income. However, there would be an equity sharing agreement, and the city would receive the amount of the original sales price write-down and a proportional share of any appreciation in value. The city could then use it share of the sales price to support other affordable housing projects and programs.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 271

5-1
Rental Apartment Housing Protoypes
This chapter includes PlaceWorks’ analyses of the impact of a 20-percent affordability requirement on the financial feasibility of two prototypical rental housing development projects. Each prototype is representative of recent development activity in Hollister. The two prototypes include:
 Prototype 4: A medium-scale three-story apartment development at a density of 20 units per acre.  Prototype 5: A larger-scale four story apartment development at a density of 32 units per acre.

Each prototype discussion includes a detailed project description, breakdowns of project revenue and costs, and analyses of financial feasibility under the three scenarios described in Section 2.7:

This chapter also includes discussions of whether any of the scenarios would generate a feasibility surplus that could be used pay a fee in lieu of providing affordable rental units on-site.

This chapter opens with a discussion of affordable household rents.

5.1 AFFORDABLE HOUSEHOLD RENTS
The affordable rent for a household is based on annual income and household size. Affordable rents are calculated in Table 5.1 for very low income, low income, and moderate income households.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 272

5-2

TABLE 5.1: CALCULATION OF AFFORDABLE RENTS BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND INCOME CLASSIFICATION (ALL DATA IN 2022 DOLLARS); HOLLISTER; 2022
Household Size: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Very low income Households
Annual income limit 36,800 42,050 47,300 52,550 56,800 61,000 65,200 69,400 73,604 Affordable housing cost
(@30%) 11,040 12,615 14,190 15,765 17,040 18,300 19,560 20,820 22,081 Annual utility allowance 3,216 3,288 3,624 3,972 3,972 4,332 4,560 4,560 4,716 Annual affordable rent 7,824 9,327 10,566 11,793 13,068 13,968 15,000 16,260 17,365 Monthly affordable rent 652 777 881 983 1,089 1,164 1,250 1,355 1,447 Low income Households
Annual income limit 58,900 67,300 75,700 84,100 90,850 97,600 104,300 111,050 117,778 Affordable housing cost
(@30%) 17,670 20,190 22,710 25,230 27,255 29,280 31,290 33,315 35,333 Annual utility allowance 3,216 3,288 3,624 3,972 3,972 4,332 4,560 4,560 4,716 Annual affordable rent 14,454 16,902 19,086 21,258 23,283 24,948 26,730 28,755 30,617 Monthly affordable rent 1,205 1,409 1,591 1,772 1,940 2,079 2,228 2,396 2,551 Moderate income Households
Annual income limit 88,250 100,900 113,500 126,100 136,200 146,300 156,350 166,450 176,538 Affordable housing cost
(@30%) 26,475 30,270 34,050 37,830 40,860 43,890 46,905 49,935 52,961 Annual utility allowance 3,216 3,288 3,624 3,972 3,972 4,332 4,560 4,560 4,716 Annual affordable rent 23,259 26,982 30,426 33,858 36,888 39,558 42,345 45,375 48,245 Monthly affordable rent 1,938 2,249 2,536 2,822 3,074 3,297 3,529 3,781 4,020 Notes to Table 5.1:

1. Data for annual income limit by household size and income classification is from Table 3.2.

2. The total affordable rent payment is considered to be 30 percent of household income.

3. Annual utility allowance data are based on the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Cruz 2022 Hollister and San Juan Bautista Utility Allowances.

4. The annual housing affordable payment is the affordable housing cost less the utility allowance. The monthly housing affordable payment is the annual payment divided by 12.

5.2 FOR-RENT DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPES AND ANALYSES
PlaceWorks defined two development scenarios for for-rent housing based on our review of recently constructed and permitted housing projects in Hollister:
 Prototype 4: A medium-scale three-story apartment development at a density of 20 units per acre  Prototype 5: A larger-scale four story apartment development at a density of 32 units per acre These prototypes are intended to reflect typical for-rent multifamily development that can be expected to be built in Hollister. The prototypes are intended to provide a generalized indication of the financial E.1.a
Packet Pg. 273

5-3
feasibility impacts of a 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement. The prototypes do not reflect any particular lot or parcel nor location in the city.

5.2.1 PROTOTYPE 4: MEDIUM-SCALE APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

PROTOTYPE DESCRIPTION
This prototype represents a fairly common suburban multifamily development. At 20 units per acre, this scale of development is fairly easy to arrange on a site, and it is fairly easy to accommodate all required parking and open space. This prototype has a three-story apartment building with 30 units on 1.5 acres.

Table 5.2 shows the types of residential units and estimated rents.

The financial feasibility analysis indicates that this type of development is not financially feasible given current market-rate rents, even with fully market-rate residential units. This may be because the density is only 20 units per acre and because current market-rate rents in Hollister may not have caught up with the increase in construction costs. The analysis indicates that market rate rents would have to increase by

9.1 percent in order for the base development scenario to be financially feasible. The data in Table 5.2 reflect this 9.1 percent increase.

TABLE 5.2: PROTOTYPE 4 HOUSING SIZES AND MONTHLY RENTS (ASSUMING A 9.1 PERCENT RENT INCREASE) Unit Type Size (sq. ft.)
Market-Rate
Rents
Below-Market-
Rate Rents Difference
Studio 700 1,886 1,265 -621 -32.9%
1-bedroom 875 2,148 1,372 -776 -36.1%
2-bedroom 1,000 2,382 1,669 -713 -29.9%
3-bedroom 1,300 2,566 1,947 -620 -24.2%
Notes to Table 5.2:

1. Unit types, sizes, and market-rate rents are PlaceWorks assumptions based on our assessment of the current market, and reflect an increase of 9.1 percent over current market rents.

2. Below-market-rate rents are based on the data in Table 5.1, assuming that studio units are 1-person households, 1-bedroom units are occupied by a mix of 1- and 2-person households, 2-bedroom units are occupied by 3-person households, and 3- bedroom units are occupied by a mix of 3- and 4-person households.

As with all five analyses conducted for this report, PlaceWorks has assessed the development implications of the base development scenario, an inclusionary housing scenario and a local bonus scenario for this prototype and compared the inclusionary housing scenario and local bonus scenario to the fully market rate scenario. The number of units in each of the alternatives is provided in Table 5.3, while a summary of the alternatives is shown in Table 5.4.
 The base development scenario includes 30 total units, composed of eight affordable housing units and 22 market-rate units. Per the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement, seven percent of the residential units (3 units) are for very low income households, seven percent of the housing units (3 units) are for low income households, and six percent of the housing units (2 units) are for moderate income households.
 The inclusionary scenario includes a 25% density bonus. The low- and moderate income housing units in the inclusionary housing scenario are both less than 10 percent and, therefore, earn no density bonus under State density bonus law. The seven percent of the housing units affordable to very low E.1.a
Packet Pg. 274

5-4
income households would entitle the inclusionary housing alternative to a density bonus of 25 percent, or an additional eight market-rate units. This brings the total size of the inclusionary housing scenario to 38 units, or 25.3 units per acre on the hypothetical 1.5-acre site.  The local bonus scenario would provide an additional 14 percent density bonus on top of the base development scenario, or an additional five market-rate units. As discussed below, this density bonus has been calculated to be the number that is necessary to make 20-percent inclusionary housing financially feasible. This creates an additional five market-rate units for a total of 43 units, or 28.7 units per acre on the hypothetical 1.5-acre site.

TABLE 5.3: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Unit Type
Base Development
Scenario Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local Bonus Scenario Total Number of
Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
Studio 8 2 8 10 2 9 11
1-bedroom 10 3 10 13 3 12 15
2-bedroom 8 2 8 10 2 9 11
3-bedroom 4 1 4 5 1 5 6
Total 30 8 30 38 8 35 43

TABLE 5.4: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Base Development
Scenario
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Market rate units 22 30 35
Below market-rate units 8 8 8
Total number of units 30 38 43
Site area (acres) 1.5 1.5 1.5
Gross density (du/acre) 20.0 25.3 28.7

PROJECT REVENUE
The estimated project revenue for Prototype 4 is presented in Table 5.5. The income for each of the scenarios is the monthly rents for the residential units. The estimated average monthly rent in the inclusionary housing scenario, $2,050 (across all market-rate and BMR units), is 6.8 percent lower than the average in a fully market rate version of the project. It is also about one percent lower than the local- bonus scenario, which has the same number of below-market-rate units with a higher number of market- rate units. The analysis assumes a 33.5 percent allowance for vacancies and operations in the first full year of occupancy. The annual net operating income increases from $526,000 in the fully market rate version, to $621,000 in the inclusionary housing scenario, to $710,000 in the local-bonus scenario.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 275

5-5

TABLE 5.5: PROTOTYPE 4 PROJECT INCOME
Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Number of units 30 38 43
Average monthly rent 2,200 2,050 2,070
Gross annual income 65,900 77,800 88,900
Less vacancies and operations -22,100 -26,100 -29,800
Annual net operating income 526,000 621,000 710,000
Notes to Table 5.5:

1. The average monthly rent is based on the rent by unit type in Table 5.3 and the number of units in Table 5.4. The gross annual income is the average monthly rent multiplied by 12 months.

2. The analysis assumes a 33.5 percent allowance for vacancies and operations. The national average across all apartments is

45.8 percent, based on data from realtyrates.com. A new apartment development in a community with very low multifamily vacancies can be expected to perform much better than the national average.

PROJECT COSTS
The estimated project costs are provided in Table 5.6. The total development cost increases with additional units, rising from $9.2 million for the fully market rate project, to $11.4 million for the inclusionary housing scenario and $12.8 million for the local-bonus scenario. However, the cost per unit decreases with fixed costs, such as land acquisition, spread across more units. The analysis estimates the per unit cost at $307,000 for the fully market rate project, $300,000 for the inclusionary housing scenario, and $298,000 for the local-bonus scenario.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 276

5-6
TABLE 5.6: PROTOTYPE 4 PROJECT COSTS
Fully Market Rate Project Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Land Cost
Estimated property value 292,000 292,000 292,000
Due diligence 14,590 14,590 14,590
Estimated land acquisition cost 306,000 306,000 306,000 Hard Costs
Site work 653,000 653,000 653,000
Building construction 5,860,000 7,410,000 8,420,000
Circulation and parking 114,400 175,000 201,300
Landscaping 142,700 121,300 103,500
Hard cost subtotal 6,770,000 8,360,000 9,380,000
Soft Costs
Design, entitlement, and other soft
costs @10.0% 677,000 836,000 938,000
Contingency @10.0% 677,000 836,000 938,000
Development impact fees 1,081,000 1,368,000 1,550,000
Soft costs subtotal 2,430,000 3,040,000 3,430,000
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 9,200,000 11,400,000 12,810,000 - per unit 307,000 300,000 298,000
Notes to Table 5.6:

1. The estimated property value is a PlaceWorks estimate based on our analysis of sales data, asking prices, and residual land values. The analysis assumes a 5 percent of land cost allowance for due diligence activities related to land acquisition. The cash flow model assumes monthly option payments of 1 percent of the estimated property value during the entitlement period, but the option payments are part of the overall payment for land acquisition rather than an additional cost.

2. Building construction costs are calculated on a per square foot basis for finished floor area and a separate square foot basis for garages. The per square foot costs are taken from Craftsman Book Company’s 2022 National Building Cost Manual, with the source’s recommended adjustments for local cost differential. As noted in the source, the per square foot cost estimates include all construction costs: labor, materials, equipment, plans, building permit, supervision, overhead, and profit.

3. Development impact fees are calculated as $29,000 per studio unit, $33,024 per 1-bedroom unit, and $43,259 per 2- or more bedroom unit. The analysis assumes that development impact fees are charged to market-rate and below-market-rate units. The city could waive development impact fees for the below-market-rate units, which could lessen the need for other subsidies, primarily the extent of the additional density bonus.

FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Table 5.7 summarizes the financial feasibility of each scenario alternative. As discussed above, the analysis is based on a 9.1 percent increase in market-rate rents. At current market-rate rents, none of the scenarios are financially feasible. The analysis finds that the fully market rate version of the project is financially feasible, generating a yield of 6.0 percent. Simply requiring 20 percent affordable housing and relying on the State Density Bonus Law to provide the incentive is not financially feasible with the assumed income-class distribution of affordable housing. This inclusionary housing scenario would require an additional $207,000 subsidy in order to be feasible.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 277

5-7
The local-bonus scenario was created to be financially feasible; ultimately providing the subsidy identified above. If the city were to provide an additional 14 percent density bonus on top of the 25.0 percent bonus allowed under state law, then the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement becomes feasible, generating an expected yield of 6.0 percent. Thus, the local bonus scenario meets the requirements for financial feasibility, and its parameters could be included in an inclusionary housing ordinance.

TABLE 5.7: PROTOTYPE 4 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY SUMMARY

Fully Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Development cost 9,200,000 11,400,000 12,800,000
Financing cost 490,000 560,000 620,000
Total project cost 10,000,000 12,000,000 13,000,000
Construction loan amount 6,200,000 7,600,000 8,600,000
Required equity 3,500,000 4,300,000 4,800,000
Net operating income after debt and taxes 208,000 245,000 290,000 Cash-on-cash yield 6.0% 5.7% 6.0%
Surplus/(Gap) w/6% Yield 0 -207,000 0
Residual land value w/6% yield 292,000 84,600 292,000
Notes to Table 5.7:

1. Financing cost includes construction loan fees of 2.5 percent and carried interest for a 6.85 annual percentage rate, based on data from realtyrates.com. The total project costs are the development cost, from Table 4.6, plus the financing cost.

2. The cash-on-cash yield annual rate of return in the first full year of occupancy based on the net operating income after debt service and taxes divided by the required equity investment.

The analysis considered other alternatives to achieve financial feasibility. Relying on a reduction in the residual land value (i.e., expecting landowners to absorb some of the cost of providing affordable housing) is, on its own, insufficient. The gap in financial feasibility is larger than the estimated cost to acquire the land in all scenarios.

IN-LIEU FEE ANALYSIS
The analysis found that none of the scenarios generated a feasibility surplus. Thus, there is no surplus in the base development scenario that could pay an in-lieu fee. In order to pay a fee rather than construct affordable units onsite, there would need to be some combination of a reduced cost for land acquisition and higher-than-current market-rate rents.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 278

5-8

5.2.2 PROTOTYPE 5: LARGER-SCALE APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

PROTOTYPE DESCRIPTION
This prototype represents a suburban multifamily development at a scale and density that is not currently common in Hollister but that does occur elsewhere in the state and is consistent with the direction of housing and development policy in the current Hollister general plan update. This prototype includes a four-story apartment building with 120 units on 3.8 acres, resulting in a gross density of 30 units per acre.

Table 5.8 shows the types of residential units and estimated rents.

TABLE 5.8: PROTOTYPE 5 HOUSING SIZES AND MONTHLY RENTS
Unit Type Size (sq. ft.)
Market-Rate
Rents
Below-Market-
Rate Rents Difference
1-bedroom 850 2,200 1,139 -1,061 -48.2%
2-bedroom 950 2,386 1,387 -999 -41.9%
3-bedroom 1,200 2,498 1,821 -677 -27.1%
Notes to Table 5.8:

1. Unit types, sizes, and market-rate rents are PlaceWorks assumptions based on our assessment of the current market.

2. Below-market-rate rents are based on the data in Table 5.7, assuming that 1-bedroom units are occupied by a mix of 1- and 2-person households, 2-bedroom units are occupied by 3-person households, and 3-bedroom units are occupied by a mix of 3- and 4-person households.

As with all five analyses conducted for this report, PlaceWorks has assessed the development implications of the base development scenario, an inclusionary housing scenario and a local bonus scenario for this prototype and compared the inclusionary housing scenario and local bonus scenario to the fully market rate scenario. The number of units in each of the alternatives is provided in Table 5.9, while a summary of the alternatives is shown in Table 5.10.
 The base development scenario includes 120 total units, composed of 25 affordable housing units and 95 market-rate units. Per the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement, seven percent of the residential units (9 units) are for very low income households, seven percent of the housing units (9 units) are for low income households, and six percent of the housing units (7 units) are for moderate income households. .
 The inclusionary scenario includes a 25% density bonus. The low income and moderate income housing units in the inclusionary housing scenario are both less than 10 percent and, therefore, would earn no density bonus under State density bonus law. The seven percent of the housing units affordable to very low income households would entitle the inclusionary housing alternative to a density bonus of 25 percent, or an additional 30 potential market-rate units, which has been rounded to 24 to maintain the same percentage distribution of unit types. This brings the total size of the inclusionary housing scenario to 150 units, or 39.4 units per acre on the hypothetical 3.8-acre site.  The local bonus scenario would provide an additional 15 percent density bonus on top of the base development scenario, or an additional 17 market-rate units. As discussed below, this density bonus has been calculated to be the number that is necessary to make 20-percent inclusionary housing financially feasible. This creates an additional 17 market-rate units for a total of 167 units, or 43.9 units per acre on the hypothetical 3.8-acre site.5
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 279

5-9
TABLE 5.9: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO Unit Type
Base Development
Scenario Inclusionary Housing Scenario Local Bonus Scenario Total Number of
Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
Below-
Market-
Rate Units
Market-
Rate Units
Total
Number of
Units
1-bedroom 40 9 41 50 9 47 56
2-bedroom 45 9 47 56 9 53 62
3-bedroom 35 8 36 44 8 41 49
Total 120 26 124 150 26 141 167

TABLE 5.10: NUMBER OF UNITS BY TYPE, AFFORDABILITY, AND SCENARIO

Base Development
Scenario
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Market rate units 94 124 141
Below market-rate units 26 26 26
Total number of units 120 150 167
Site area (acres) 3.8 3.8 3.8
Gross density (du/acre) 31.6 39.4 43.9

PROJECT REVENUE
The estimated project revenue for Prototype 5 is presented in Table 5.11. The only income for each of the scenarios is the monthly rents for the residential units. The estimated average monthly rent in the inclusionary housing scenario, $2,200, (across all market-rate and BMR units), is seven percent lower than the average in a fully market-rate version of the project and less than one percent lower than the local- bonus scenario, which has the same number of below-market-rate units with a higher number of market- rate units. The analysis assumes a 33.5 percent allowance for vacancies and operations in the first full year of occupancy. The annual net operating income increases from $2.26 million in the fully market-rate scenario, to $2.63 million in the inclusionary housing scenario, to $2.95 million in the local-bonus scenario.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 280

5-10

TABLE 5.11: PROTOTYPE 5 PROJECT INCOME
Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Number of units 120 150 167
Average monthly rent 2,360 2,200 2,210
Gross annual income 283,000 330,000 370,000
Less vacancies and operations -94,700 -110,400 -123,800 Annual net operating income 2,260,000 2,630,000 2,950,000 Notes to Table 5.11:

1. The average monthly rent is based on the rent by unit type in Table 5.3 and the number of units in Table 5.4. The gross annual income is the average monthly rent multiplied by 12 months.

2. The analysis assumes a 33.5 percent allowance for vacancies and operations. The national average across all apartments is

45.8 percent, based on data from realtyrates.com. A new apartment development in a community with very low multifamily vacancies can be expected to perform much better than the national average.

PROJECT COSTS
The estimated project costs are provided in Table 5.12. The overall cost increases with additional units, rising from $38.0 million for the fully market-rate project, to $47.2 million for the inclusionary housing scenario and $52.3 million for the local-bonus scenario. However, the cost per unit decreases with fixed costs, such as land acquisition, spread across more units. The analysis estimates the per unit cost at $317,000 for the fully market-rate project, $315,000 for the inclusionary housing scenario, and $313,000 for the local-bonus scenario.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 281

5-11

TABLE 5.12: PROTOTYPE 5 PROJECT COSTS

Fully Market Rate Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Land Cost
Estimated property value 1,313,000 1,313,000 1,313,000
Due diligence 65,600 65,600 65,600
Estimated land acquisition cost 1,378,000 1,378,000 1,378,000 Hard Costs
Site work 1,634,000 1,634,000 1,634,000
Building construction 0 31,800,000 35,400,000
Circulation and parking 525,000 777,000 875,000
Landscaping 205,000 173,000 119,000
Hard cost subtotal 27,700,000 34,400,000 38,000,000
Soft Costs
Design, entitlement, and other soft
costs @10.0% 2,770,000 3,440,000 3,800,000
Contingency @10.0% 2,770,000 3,440,000 3,800,000
Development impact fees 4,780,000 5,980,000 6,650,000
Soft costs subtotal 10,330,000 12,900,000 14,300,000
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 38,000,000 47,200,000 52,300,000 - per unit 317,000 315,000 313,000
Notes to Table 5.12:

1. The estimated property value is a PlaceWorks estimate based on our analysis of sales data, asking prices, and residual land values. The analysis assumes a 5 percent of land cost allowance for due diligence activities related to land acquisition. The cash flow model assumes monthly option payments of 1 percent of the estimated property value during the entitlement period, but the option payments are part of the overall payment for land acquisition rather than an additional cost.

2. Building construction costs are calculated on a per square foot basis for finished floor area and a separate square foot basis for garages. The per square foot costs are taken from Craftsman Book Company’s 2022 National Building Cost Manual, with the source’s recommended adjustments for local cost differential. As noted in the source, the per square foot cost estimates include all construction costs: labor, materials, equipment, plans, building permit, supervision, overhead, and profit.

3. Development impact fees are calculated as $33,024 per 1-bedroom unit and $43,259 per 2- or more bedroom unit. The analysis assumes that development impact fees are charged to market-rate and below-market-rate units. The city could waive development impact fees for the below-market-rate units, which could lessen the need for other subsidies, primarily the extent of the additional density bonus.

FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Table 5.13 summarizes the financial feasibility of each scenario. The analysis finds that the fully market- rate project is financially feasible, generating a yield of 6.4 percent. At a 6.0 percent yield, the base development scenario would generate a surplus of $1.87 million. This inclusionary housing scenario would require an additional $407,000 subsidy in order to be feasible.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 282

5-12
The local-bonus scenario was created to be financially feasible; ultimately providing the subsidy identified above. If the city were to provide an additional 15 percent density bonus on top of the 25.0 percent bonus allowed under state law, then the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement becomes feasible, generating an expected yield of 6.0 percent. Thus, the local bonus scenario meets the requirements for financial feasibility, and its parameters could be included in an inclusionary housing ordinance.

TABLE 5.13: PROTOTYPE 5 FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY SUMMARY

Fully Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary Housing
Scenario Local-Bonus Scenario
Development cost 38,000,000 47,200,000 52,300,000
Financing cost 2,120,000 2,440,000 2,680,000
Total project cost 40,200,000 49,700,000 55,000,000
Construction loan amount 27,100,000 33,600,000 37,200,000 Required equity 13,080,000 16,090,000 17,740,000
Net operating income after debt and taxes -13,080,000 -16,090,000 -17,740,000 Cash-on-cash yield 6.4% 5.9% 6.0%
Surplus/(Gap) w/6% Yield 1,872,000 -407,000 0
Residual land value w/6% yield 3,180,000 906,000 1,313,000 Notes to Table 5.13:

1. Financing cost includes construction loan fees of 2.5 percent and carried interest for a 6.85 annual percentage rate, based on data from realtyrates.com. The total project costs are the development cost, from Table 4.6, plus the financing cost.

2. The cash-on-cash yield annual rate of return in the first full year of occupancy based on the net operating income after debt service and taxes divided by the required equity investment.

The analysis considered other alternatives to achieve financial feasibility. Relying on a reduction in the residual land value (i.e., expecting landowners to absorb some of the cost of providing affordable housing) would result in a 31 percent reduction in the value of land, if sold to a developer for this project under the inclusionary housing scenario.

The analysis also considered current market rents and found that the inclusionary housing scenario would be financially feasible if rents increased by 2.0 percent.

IN-LIEU FEE ANALYSIS
The analysis found that the fully market-rate version of this prototype generated a feasibility surplus of $1.87 million. This represents $72,000 per each of the 26 units of affordable housing needed to achieve the 20 percent inclusionary requirement. This is not sufficient to construct an affordable housing unit. It could be used to subsidize an affordable housing developer and help them leverage other affordable housing funding, but it is not clear if this would generate as much affordable housing as the 20 percent inclusionary housing requirement.

If applied as an in-lieu fee, the $1.87 million feasibility surplus would represent a fee of $1,560 per market-rate unit or $11.82 per square foot for new market-rate housing.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 283

5-13
This page intentionally left blank.

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 284

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX A
P ROTOTYPE 1: I NCOME, C OST

AND F EASIBILITY D ETAILS
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 285

........................................................................................................................

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 286

Single-Family Large-Lot Subdivision Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary Hous-
ing Scenario
Local Bonus Sce-
nario

PROJECT INCOME DETAILS
Average Market-Rate Unit Sales Value
3-Bedroom 977,500 977,500 977,500
4-Bedroom 1,058,000 1,058,000 1,058,000
5-Bedroom 1,150,000 1,150,000 1,150,000
6-Bedroom 1,380,000 1,380,000 1,380,000
Average BMR Unit Sales Value
3-Bedroom 173,062 173,062
4-Bedroom 193,838 193,838
5-Bedroom 215,668 215,668
6-Bedroom 264,343 264,343
Number of Market Rate Units
3-Bedroom 70 73 100
4-Bedroom 70 73 100
5-Bedroom 50 52 72
6-Bedroom 30 31 43
Number of BMR Units
3-Bedroom 0 15 15
4-Bedroom 0 15 15
5-Bedroom 0 10 10
6-Bedroom 0 6 6
Average per unit sales value 1,097,205 946,974 983,203
Gross sales value 241,385,000 260,417,746 354,936,246
Less sales commission -14,483,100 -15,625,065 -21,296,175 Total Net Sales Value 226,901,900 244,792,681 333,640,071

PROJECT COST DETAILS
Land Cost
Estimated property value 10,700,000 10,700,000 10,700,000 Due diligence 535,000 535,000 535,000
Estimated land acquisition cost 11,235,000 11,235,000 11,235,000 Hard Costs
Site work 12,508,778 12,508,778 12,508,778
- water and sewer 4,522,778 4,522,778 4,522,778
- other site work 7,986,000 7,986,000 7,986,000
Building construction 123,014,946 153,472,345 201,747,515 Circulation and parking 4,689,960 6,685,250 7,489,350
Landscaping 5,479,969 4,991,736 4,223,595
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 287

Hard cost subtotal 145,693,652 177,658,108 225,969,238
Soft Costs Design, entitlement, and other soft costs @10.0% 14,569,365 17,765,811 22,596,924
Contingency @10.0% 14,569,365 17,765,811 22,596,924
Development impact fees 11,926,055 14,907,569 19,569,572 Marketing 1,206,925 1,302,089 1,774,681
Soft costs subtotal 42,271,710 51,741,279 66,538,101
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 187,965,363 229,399,387 292,507,338 - per unit 854,388 834,180 810,270

PROJECT FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Development cost 187,965,363 229,399,387 292,507,338
Financing cost 13,166,594 14,910,975 18,463,007
Total project cost 201,131,957 244,310,363 310,970,346
Construction loan amount 161,657,181 197,311,138 252,521,137 Required equity 39,474,776 46,999,225 58,449,209
Net project income 9,508,299 -10,489,190 11,673,581
Project IRR 17.4% -18.6% 15.2%
Surplus/(Gap) w/15% IRR 1,041,126 -15,413,647 107,000
Residual land value w/15% IRR 11,741,126 -4,713,647 10,807,000 E.1.a
Packet Pg. 288

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX B
PROTOTYPE 2 : INCOME,

COST AND FEASIBILITY

DETAILS
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 289

........................................................................................................................

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 290

Single-Family Medium Density Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary
Housing Sce-
nario
Local Bonus
Scenario

PROJECT INCOME DETAILS
Average Market-Rate Unit Sales Value
3-Bedroom 879,750 879,750 879,750
4-Bedroom 952,200 952,200 952,200
5-Bedroom 1,035,000 1,035,000 1,035,000
3-Bedroom TH 1,380,000
Average BMR Unit Sales Value
3-Bedroom 173,062 173,062
4-Bedroom 193,838 193,838
5-Bedroom 215,668 215,668
3-Bedroom TH 173,062
Number of Market Rate Units
3-Bedroom 110 115 92
4-Bedroom 90 94 76
5-Bedroom 20 20 17
3-Bedroom TH 59
Number of BMR Units
3-Bedroom 0 23 18
4-Bedroom 0 19 14
5-Bedroom 0 4 3
3-Bedroom TH 11
Average per unit sales value 923,502 799,651 779,334
Gross sales value 203,170,500 219,904,079 226,006,743
Less sales commission -12,190,230 -13,194,245 -13,560,405 Total Net Sales Value 190,980,270 206,709,834 212,446,339

PROJECT COST DETAILS
Land Cost
Estimated property value 4,280,000 4,280,000 4,280,000
Due diligence 214,000 214,000 214,000
Estimated land acquisition cost 4,494,000 4,494,000 4,494,000 Hard Costs
Site work 6,812,622 6,993,533 6,993,533
- water and sewer 3,618,222 3,799,133 3,799,133
- other site work 3,194,400 3,194,400 3,194,400
Building construction 104,956,210 131,051,565 132,096,481 E.1.a
Packet Pg. 291

Circulation and parking 2,813,976 4,011,150 4,095,300
Landscaping 1,393,888 1,076,035 1,018,425
Hard cost subtotal 115,976,696 143,132,283 144,203,740
Soft Costs Design, entitlement, and other soft costs @10.0% 11,597,670 14,313,228 14,420,374
Contingency @10.0% 11,597,670 14,313,228 14,420,374
Development impact fees 11,926,055 14,907,569 14,954,212 Marketing 1,015,853 1,099,520 1,130,034
Soft costs subtotal 36,137,246 44,633,546 44,924,994
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 152,113,942 187,765,829 189,128,733 - per unit 691,427 682,785 652,168

PROJECT FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Development cost 152,113,942 187,765,829 189,128,733
Financing cost 10,186,688 11,780,948 11,830,974
Total project cost 162,300,630 199,546,777 200,959,707
Construction loan amount 132,586,694 163,368,182 164,533,047 Required equity 29,713,937 36,178,595 36,426,660
Net project income 20,144,754 2,843,171 7,151,063
Project IRR 47.3% 6.3% 15.3%
Surplus/(Gap) w/15% IRR 7,461,126 -3,205,869 94,590
Residual land value w/15% IRR 11,741,126 1,074,131 4,374,590 E.1.a
Packet Pg. 292

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX C
PROTOTYPE 3 : INCOME,

COST AND FEASIBILITY

DETAILS
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 293

........................................................................................................................

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 294

Condo Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary
Housing Sce-
nario
Local Bonus
Scenario

PROJECT INCOME DETAILS
Average Market-Rate Unit Sales Value
1-bedroom/1-bath 279,000 279,000 279,000
2-bedroom/2-bath 405,000 405,000 405,000

Average BMR Unit Sales Value
1-bedroom/1-bath 191,681 173,062
2-bedroom/2-bath 99,938 193,838

Number of Market Rate Units
1-bedroom/1-bath 6 6 10
2-bedroom/2-bath 6 6 9

Number of BMR Units
1-bedroom/1-bath 0 1 1
2-bedroom/2-bath 0 2 2

Average per unit sales value 342,000 299,704 310,298
Gross sales value 4,104,000 4,495,557 4,104,000
Less sales commission -246,240 -269,733 -246,240
Total Net Sales Value 3,857,760 4,225,824 3,857,760

PROJECT COST DETAILS
Land Cost
Estimated property value 48,636 48,636 48,636
Due diligence 2,432 2,432 2,432
Estimated land acquisition cost 51,068 51,068 51,068
Hard Costs
Site work 108,900 108,900 108,900

Building construction 2,044,979 2,750,762 3,933,723
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 295

Circulation and parking 14,963 22,969 34,453
Landscaping 23,963 19,410 13,066
Hard cost subtotal 2,192,804 2,902,041 4,090,142
Soft Costs Design, entitlement, and other soft costs @10.0% 219,280 290,204 409,014
Contingency @10.0% 219,280 290,204 409,014
Development impact fees 457,703 577,246 839,122
Marketing 20,520 22,797 34,133
Soft costs subtotal 916,784 1,180,451 1,691,283
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 3,109,588 4,082,492 5,781,425 - per unit 259,132 272,166 262,792

PROJECT FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Development cost 3,109,588 4,082,173 5,781,425
Financing cost 219,066 270,006 376,948
Total project cost 3,328,654 4,352,179 6,158,373
Construction loan amount 2,745,535 3,593,588 5,094,635
Required equity 583,118 758,591 1,063,738
Net project income 396,079 -172,613 212,544
Project IRR 46.5% -19.4% 15.4%
Surplus/(Gap) w/15% IRR 212,676 -248,247 25,131
Residual land value w/15% IRR 261,312 -199,611 73,767
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 296

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX D
PROTOTYPE 4 : INCOME,

COST AND FEASIBILITY

DETAILS
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 297

........................................................................................................................

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 298

Medium-scale three-story apartments Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary
Housing Sce-
nario
Local Bonus
Scenario

PROJECT INCOME DETAILS
Average Market-Rate Unit Monthly Rent
Studio 1,886 1,886 1,886
1-bedroom unit count 2,148 2,148 2,148
2-bedroom unit count 2,382 2,382 2,382
3-bedroom 2,566 2,566 2,566
Average BMR Unit Monthly Rent
Studio 1,265 1,265
1-bedroom unit count 1,372 1,372
2-bedroom unit count 1,669 1,669
3-bedroom 1,947 1,947
Number of Market Rate Units
Studio 8 8 9
1-bedroom unit count 10 10 12
2-bedroom unit count 8 8 9
3-bedroom 4 4 5
Number of BMR Units
Studio 0 2 2
1-bedroom unit count 0 3 3
2-bedroom unit count 0 2 2
3-bedroom 0 1 1
Average per unit monthly rent 2,196 2,048 2,069
Gross monthly rent 65,889 77,818 88,948
Less vacancies and operations -22,073 -26,069 -29,798
Annual net operating income 525,797 620,986 709,805

PROJECT COST DETAILS
Land Cost
Estimated property value 291,818 291,818 291,818
Due diligence 14,591 14,591 14,591
Estimated land acquisition cost 306,409 306,409 306,409 Hard Costs
Site work 653,400 653,400 653,400

Building construction 5,855,572 7,412,469 8,421,933
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 299

Circulation and parking 114,380 175,000 201,250
Landscaping 142,664 121,267 103,505
Hard cost subtotal 6,766,017 8,362,136 9,380,089
Soft Costs Design, entitlement, and other soft costs @10.0% 676,602 836,214 938,009
Contingency @10.0% 676,602 836,214 938,009
Development impact fees 1,081,360 1,368,212 1,549,780
Marketing 0 0 0
Soft costs subtotal 2,434,563 3,040,639 3,425,798
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 9,200,580 11,402,775 12,805,886 - per unit 306,686 300,073 297,811

PROJECT FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Development cost 9,200,580 11,402,775 12,805,886
Financing cost 494,180 561,514 624,803
Total project cost 9,694,760 11,964,289 13,430,689
Construction loan amount 6,224,728 7,638,425 8,590,622
Required equity 3,470,033 4,325,864 4,840,067
Net operating income after debt and taxes 207,552 245,127 290,331 Cash-on-cash yield 6.0% 5.7% 6.0%
Surplus/(Gap) w/6% Yield 0 -207,191 0
Residual land value w/6% yield 291,818 84,627 291,818
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 300

Larger-scale apartments Market Rate
Project
Inclusionary
Housing Sce-
nario
Local Bonus
Scenario

PROJECT INCOME DETAILS
Average Market-Rate Unit Monthly Rent
1-bedroom unit count 2,200 2,200 2,200
2-bedroom unit count 2,386 2,386 2,386
3-bedroom 2,498 2,498 2,498
Average BMR Unit Monthly Rent
1-bedroom unit count 1,139 1,139
2-bedroom unit count 1,387 1,387
3-bedroom 1,821 1,821
Number of Market Rate Units
1-bedroom unit count 40 41 47
2-bedroom unit count 45 47 53
3-bedroom 35 36 41
Number of BMR Units
1-bedroom unit count 0 9 9
2-bedroom unit count 0 9 9
3-bedroom 0 8 8
Average per unit monthly rent 2,357 2,197 2,213
Gross monthly rent 282,796 329,571 369,577
Less vacancies and operations -94,737 -110,406 -123,808 Annual net operating income 2,256,715 2,629,977 2,949,221

PROJECT COST DETAILS
Land Cost
Estimated property value 1,312,500 1,312,500 1,312,500
Due diligence 65,625 65,625 65,625
Estimated land acquisition cost 1,378,125 1,378,125 1,378,125 Hard Costs
Site work 1,633,500 1,633,500 1,633,500

Building construction 25,356,488 31,801,421 35,399,178
Circulation and parking 525,350 777,000 875,000
Landscaping 204,886 172,667 119,115
Hard cost subtotal 27,720,224 34,384,588 38,026,792
Soft Costs
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 301

........................................................................................................................

A PPENDIX E
PROTOTYPE 5 : INCOME,

COST AND FEASIBILITY

DETAILS
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 302

........................................................................................................................

E.1.a
Packet Pg. 303

Design, entitlement, and other soft costs
@10.0% 2,772,022 3,438,459 3,802,679
Contingency @10.0% 2,772,022 3,438,459 3,802,679
Development impact fees 4,781,728 5,977,160 6,651,160
Marketing 0 0 0
Soft costs subtotal 10,325,773 12,854,078 14,256,518
Total Development Cost
Total cost (before financing) 38,045,997 47,238,665 52,283,311 - per unit 317,050 314,924 313,074

PROJECT FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
Development cost 38,045,997 47,238,665 52,283,311
Financing cost 2,123,955 2,440,956 2,684,063
Total project cost 40,169,952 49,679,621 54,967,373
Construction loan amount 27,085,448 33,592,110 37,232,251 Required equity 13,084,504 16,087,512 17,735,123
Net operating income after debt and taxes -13,084,504 -16,087,512 -17,735,123 Cash-on-cash yield 6.4% 5.9% 6.0%
Surplus/(Gap) w/6% Yield 1,871,628 -406,875 0
Residual land value w/6% yield 3,184,128 905,625 1,312,500 E.1.a
Packet Pg. 304

TABLE 4.8: PROTOTYPE 5 HOUSING SIZES AND MONTHLY RENTS
Unit Type Size (sq. ft.)
Market-Rate
Rents
Below-Market-
Rate Rents Difference
1-bedroom 850 2,200 1,139 -1,061 -48.2
2-bedroom 950 2,386 1,387 -999 -41.9
3-bedroom 1,200 2,498 1,821 -677 -27.1
E.1.a
Packet Pg. 305

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2023-10

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HOLLISTER RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ADOPT CHAPTER 17.36, INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM (ZOA 2023-4)

WHEREAS, the State of California requires local governments to plan to meet the housing needs of all income groups. Specifically, "local and state governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community" pursuant to the State Government Code Section 65580; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that there is a demand for affordable housing for very low, low, and moderate income households in the City of Hollister as documented in the City of Hollister Housing Element; and

WHEREAS, Housing Element Goal H4 of the General Plan requires the City to develop affordable housing opportunities in the City. Furthermore, Policy H.4 of the Housing Element requires the City to establish a program for increasing affordable housing in the City by requiring residential developers to provide a percentage of the units within a residential development to very low, low and moderate income households; and

WHEREAS, on August 3, 2020 the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-147 accepting awarded grant funding from Housing and Community Development related to the Senate Bill 2:

Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB2) planning grant program; and

WHEREAS, as part of the ongoing 2040 General Plan Update, the City Council at its regular June 21, 2021 discussed affordable housing within the City and potential inclusionary requirements and directed Staff include a 20 percent affordability component as a recommended policy within the 2040 General Plan Update; and

WHEREAS, on November 1, 2021 the City Council, based on the recommended policy direction for the General Plan Update, directed Staff to conduct a financial feasibility analysis and prepare an inclusionary ordinance which requires residential developers to include a 20 percent affordability component utilizing the award SB Planning Grant funds; and

WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022 Staff discussed the inclusionary ordinance with the City Council and the City Council reaffirmed that the inclusionary ordinance should be prepared which requires a 20 percent affordability component for all residential projects; and

WHEREAS, the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis dated January 2023 was prepared by PlaceWorks and is included to this Resolution as Exhibit B; and

WHEREAS, the Inclusionary Housing Program Financial Feasibility Analysis used, E.1.b
Packet Pg. 306

PC Resolution 2023-10
ZOA 2023-4/ Inclusionary Housing

Page 2 of 3 ends
← All documents from this meeting