AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING of THE HOLTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
121 WEST FIFTH STREET - HOLTVILLE, CALIFORNIA
Mike Goodsell, Mayor George Morris, City Treasurer Alex Silva, Fire Chief Michael Pacheco, Mayor Pro Tem Nick Wells, City Manager Damian Martinez, Police Chief Murray Anderson, Council Member Chandler Sinclair, Finance Supervisor Jack Holt, City Engineer John Munger, Council Member Steve Walker, City Attorney Jeorge Galvan, City Planner Vanessa Ramirez, Council Member Yvette Rios, City Clerk
THIS IS A PUBLIC MEETING
which may invade an individual's personal privacy are not permitted.
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING CONVENED - 5:30
CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is the time for the public to address the City Council on any item appearing on the Closed Session agenda for this meeting.
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
(Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager/City Attorney
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT:
(Government Code Section 54957)
City Manager Evaluation
Evaluation Criteria
RECONVENE OPEN SESSION - 6:00 PM
PLEDGE of ALLEGIANCE:
EXECUTIVE SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:
HFD Staff
Alex Silva, Fire Chief
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public may address the City Council on any item that DOES NOT appear on the agenda for this meeting within the purview of the City Council.
Monday, April 28, 2025
The Holtville City Council values your input if there is an issue on which you wish to be heard, for both items listed on the agenda and for items of general concern. The Mayor reserves the right to place a limit on each person's comments. Any public comments must include the individual's name and address for the record. Personal attacks on individuals and/or comments which are slanderous or
RECOGNITION
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS:
INVOCATION:
CITY CLERK RE: Verification of Posting of the Agenda Friday, April 25, 2025 CONSENT AGENDA:
a. Approval of the Minutes from the Regular Meeting of Monday, April 14, 2025. b. Current Demands #47867 through #47943.
REPORTS of OFFICERS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES and COMMUNIQUES:
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS:
a. PUBLIC HEARINGDiscussion/Related Action to Adopt RESOLUTION #25-11 Certifying the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge Project Jeorge Galvan City Planner
b. Discussion/Related Action Regarding Streets Project Submissions to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Under the Federal Highway Administration Surface Transportation Block (STBG) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Programs Nick Wells, City Manager
c. Discussion/Related Action to Approve an Intergovernmental Service Agreement with the Imperial County Sheriff Department for Incident Reporting Software Use Alex Silva, Fire Chief
d. Discussion/Related Action to Approve the Purchase of Additional Text Messages from TextMyGov Yvette Rios, City Clerk
INFORMATION ONLY: None
STAFF REPORTS
a. City Manager Report - Nick Wells
b. Finance Supervisor - Chandler Sinclair
c. Fire Chief - Alex Silva
d. Water/Wastewater Supervisor - Frank Cornejo
e. Public Works Foreman - Alex Chavez
Items for Future Meetings:
ADJOURNMENT:
I, Yvette Rios, City Clerk of the City of Holtville, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing agenda was duly posted at Holtville City Hall and on the City of Holtville's website (www.Holtville.ca.gov) on Friday, April 25, 2025. 04/28/25
1. The items on the Consent Agenda are to be approved without comment. Should any Council Member or member of the public wish to discuss any item, they may request that the item be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the NEW Business agenda.
2. 3.
4. 5.
6. 7.
MEETING DATE:
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF ITEM NUMBER
CITY MANAGER
FINANCE MANAGER
CITY ATTORNEY
The Regular Meeting of the Holtville City Council was held on Monday, April 14, 2025, at 5:30 pm in the Civic Center. Mayor Mike Goodsell was present, as were Council Members Murray Anderson, Mike Pacheco, and Vanessa Ramirez. Council Member John Munger was absent. Also present were Finance Supervisor Chandler Sinclair, Police Chief Damian Martinez, City Attorney Steve Walker, City Manager Nick Wells, and City Clerk Yvette Rios.
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:
The Closed Session meeting was called to order at 5:33 PM. by Mayor Mike Goodsell.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS:
(Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager/City Attorney
No Reportable Action Taken
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT:
(Government Code Section 54957)
City Manager Evaluation
Evaluation Criteria
CITY COUNCIL OPEN SESSION MEETING CALLED TO ORDER:
Mayor Goodsell called the Open Session meeting to order at 6:07 PM.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mr. Morris led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION: The Invocation was given by Mr. Goodsell.
CITY CLERK RE: VERIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
City Clerk Yvette Rios verified that the agenda was duly posted on Friday, April 11, 2025.
EXECUTIVE SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Mr. Walker reported that there was no reportable action from the Closed Session.
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS: No Public Comments were registered.
1. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA: Ms. Ward
a. Approval of the Minutes from the Regular Meeting of Monday, March 24, 2025. b. Current Demands #47829 through #47866
A motion was made by Mr. Pacheco and seconded by Mr. Anderson to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion passed in the form of a roll call vote.
AYES: Anderson, Pacheco, Ramirez, Goodsell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Munger
ABSTAIN: None
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMUNIQUES:
Ms. Rios reported that she enjoyed attending the Turning Point Banquet with Councilwoman Ramirez on Friday. She announced that there will be a scavenger hunt at Thursday's Farmers Market and that she will be scheduling photographs soon with the selected photographer, Kylee Collins. 4/28/25
1 a
THE HOLTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, April 14, 2025
Approvals
Mr. Wells reported on recent meetings he attended, one to note was regarding potential cameras for public facilities to discourage and survey vandalism.
Mr. Walker had nothing to report.
Mrs. Ramirez reported that she attended the Turning Point Banquet as well as other community events such as a reading program at the public library for her children and the HHS Cheer Clinic.
She looks forward to attending the Farmers Market, Easter in the Park, and the Holtville Car Show.
Mr. Anderson reported that he attended a Chamber board meeting and announced for those who were not aware that the Executive Director had resigned and they are looking to fill her position. He also attended the Autism Fair in Imperial and was happy to announce 29 years married.
Mr. Pacheco announced that on Wednesday IID will hold an Open House in the Civic Center to inform residents of their services and programs.
Mr. Morris reported that Schwingfest was well attended at the IV Swiss Club. He attended the Turning Point banquet as well and the Pulled Pork Cook Off.
Undersheriff Robert Benavidez was in attendance to formally introduce to the Council their new Police Chief, Sargeant Damian Martinez. He explained that Chief Martinez has a history of two instances being station in Holtville and ICSO believed he was a perfect fit for the community.
Ms. Sinclair reported that she is looking forward to attending the Farmers Market for the first time.
Mayor Goodsell reported that he attended a SCAG scholarship committee meeting in LA and has upcoming an ALUC meeting, a two-on-two meeting with IID, and a CLoC leaders summit in Sacramento.
2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None
3. NEW BUSINESS:
a. Discussion/Related Action to Adopt RESOLUTION #25-10 Authorizing an Agreement with SitelogiQ to Analyze and Design Energy Efficiency Strategies and Solutions for City Buildings and Facilities Nick Wells, City Manager This item was tabled for future discussion.
Mr. Wells delineated how an initial analysis by SitelogiQ indicates substantial potential for savings.
They are requesting authorization to perform a more extensive evaluation of City buildings and facilities with the objective of forming a project that proves great financial potential. If their analysis does yield a favorable outcome, the City may select to proceed with the project and will not incur costs for the analysis. However, if further analysis does not reveal high potential savings, SitelogiQ will withdraw their services, in which case the City will be responsible to pay for the analysis.
Mr. Anderson presented an alternative option of delaying a decision until ground is broken for the Public Safety Building.
A motion was made by Mr. Anderson and seconded by Mr. Pacheco to table the item for future discussion. The motion passed in the form of a roll call vote.
AYES: Anderson, Pacheco, Ramirez, Goodsell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Munger
ABSTAIN: None
b. Discussion/Related Action Regarding Ongoing Use of City Facilities and Financial Considerations for Holtville Little League Nick Wells, City Manager This item was tabled for future discussion.
Given that a representative of the organization in consideration of financial assistance was not in attendance to present their requests, the item was tabled for future discussion. c. Discussion/Related Action Regarding a Proposal by the Imperial County Sheriff's Office (ISCO) to base a Canine Officer in the City of Holtville Nick Wells, City Manager This item was tabled for future discussion.
In attendance to provide supplemental information on the item was Lieutenant Conkey. He explained that ICSO secured funding to purchase two narcotics detection dogs for patrol and the County Jailhouse.
In a recent development, ICSO has found additional funding to potentially acquire a third K-9. Their proposal is to partner with the City in purchasing this third K-9- to be assigned to Holtville. The partnership would entail a one-time payment of half the cost to purchase the dog, $7k and a per diem salary of the K-9 handler, totaling $803 biweekly. Discussion ensued regarding the potential use and whether there is a need for a narcotics detection dog in the City of Holtville. Lieutenant Conkey and Undersheriff Benavidez explained that although many requests for detection dogs come from local schools, the presence of the K-9 at traffic stops and other calls will expand their scope of influence for seizing narcotics that would not be discovered without the reasonable cause to search granted by the detection of narcotics by a K-9. Mr. Wells expressed concern for the fiscal impact this action would present to the budget. Mayor Goodsell and Mr. Anderson rationalized that since the local schools will inevitably exercise frequent use of the K-9, it would be reasonable to request that they share the financial responsibility. They directed Mr. Wells to conference with the Holtville Unified School District (HUSD) to determine whether they would accept such an arrangement. The Council decided it was best to table this discussion to allow Mr. Wells to communicate with HUSD and so that ICSO may assess other presented options such as committing to temporarily assigning the K-9 to Holtville so that the Council may ascertain that it will be a beneficial investment.
4. INFORMATION ONLY:
a. Discussion Only Regarding Annual Contractual Rate Adjustment for Solid Waste Removal Services by CR&R, Inc. Nick Wells, City Manager Mr. Wells stated that the City has contracted solid waste removal services from CR&R for 15 years, throughout which time, Holtville has been awarded the lowest trash rates in the Imperial Valley.
Per the agreement, CR&R may not adjust rates higher than 4% annually. Mr. Wells deduced that the scheduled rate adjustment of 2.3% is fair and within their power to impose. CR&R requested that Mr. Wells bring this information before the Council to ensure that they are fully aware of the increase.
5. STAFF REPORTS:
a. City Manager Report - Nick Wells Mr. Wells delineated critical updates on projects such as the Public Safety Building, Pine Crossing Apartments, and Citywide Street Maintenance. b. Finance Supervisor - Chandler Sinclair Not submitted c. Police Chief - Damian Martinez
d. Water/Wastewater Consultant - Frank Cornejo
e. Public Works Supervisor - Alex Chavez
Tabled items
Recognition of Fire Staff
7. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Goodsell adjourned the meeting at 7:10 PM.
6. Items for Future Meetings:
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 1 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Report Criteria:
Report type: GL detail
Check.Type = {<>} "Adjustment"
Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount 47807
04/14/2025 47807 JADE SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 0220450 12-31610-4430 119.97- 119.97- MONITOR SECURITY SYSTEM 04/14/2025 47807 JADE SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 0220450 11-31520-44300 119.97- 119.97- MONITOR SECURITY SYSTEM Total 47807: 239.94-
47944
04/16/2025 47944 8x8, INC. 4926466 11-31510-44250 54.07 54.07 TELEPHONE 04/16/2025 47944 8x8, INC. 4926466 12-31620-4425 54.07 54.07 TELEPHONE 04/16/2025 47944 8x8, INC. 4926466 10-14020-4425 54.07 54.07 TELEPHONE 04/16/2025 47944 8x8, INC. 4926466 10-12001-4425 54.07 54.07 TELEPHONE 04/16/2025 47944 8x8, INC. 4926466 10-12003-4425 54.07 54.07 TELEPHONE Total 47944: 270.35
47945
04/16/2025 47945 AA ELECTRIC 2464 10-31150-44300 808.13 808.13 MOTOR REPAIRS Total 47945: 808.13
47946
04/16/2025 47946 ACCUSOURCEHR 67570 10-22080-4430 97.20 97.20 PRE-HIRE Total 47946: 97.20
47947
04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE 5648053431 10-22080-4420 259.51 259.51 BATTERY 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F04164 11-31520-44200 4.30 4.30 COUPLERS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F06547 10-31150-44200 75.41 75.41 EZ SEED 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F06729 10-31150-44200 65.44 65.44 SPRAY HEAD 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F06840 10-22080-4420 10.33 10.33 SPRAY HEAD 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F06975 10-31150-44200 51.71 51.71 EZ SEED 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07033 10-31158-44200 27.99 27.99 AIR FILTER 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07045 10-31158-44200 8.18 8.18 FILTERS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07125 10-22080-4420 63.10 63.10 TAPE, TAGS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07703 10-31150-44200 21.54 21.54 BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07734 10-31150-44200 25.16 25.16 ROUND UP 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07808 10-31140-44210 11.84 11.84 SAW 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07921 10-31150-44200 19.54 19.54 BATTERIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07976 10-31150-44200 58.09 58.09 CEMENT MIX 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F07978 10-31150-44200 32.27 32.27 CEMENT MIX 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08018 11-31510-44200 161.71 161.71 BATTERIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08018 12-31620-4420 161.71 161.71 BATTERIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08063 10-22080-4420 8.18 8.18 MOTOR OIL 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08108 10-31150-44200 50.92 50.92 BATTERIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08262 10-22080-4420 20.45 20.45 CLEANING SUPPLIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08329 10-22080-4420 79.69 79.69 BATTERIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08334 10-31140-44200 24.10 24.10 BLADES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08551 10-31140-44200 7.74 7.74 KEYS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F08572 10-31150-44310 24.77 24.77 CHAIN LOOP 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09139 10-31150-44200 417.85 417.85 CLEANING SUPPLIES, SIGNS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09151 10-31150-44200 22.81 22.81 CLEANING SUPPLIES M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
VOID
ADMIN
PW
FIRE DEPT
PW
FIRE DEPT
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 2 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09271 10-22080-4420 12.92 12.92 HOSE NOZZLE 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09313 10-31150-44200 187.58 187.58 PAINTING SUPPLIES, PUTTY KNIFE 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09362 10-31150-44200 19.38 19.38 LED LIGHTS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09423 10-31150-44200 14.61 14.61 PAINTING SUPPLIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09517 10-22080-4420 10.76 10.76 STORAGE TOTE 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09539 10-31150-44200 66.08 66.08 PAINTING SUPPLIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09602 10-31150-44200 12.48 12.48 PAINTING SUPPLIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09640 10-31150-44200 40.91 40.91 POWER STRIP, BRUSH 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09815 11-31530-44200 25.74 25.74 ADAPTERS 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09834 10-31150-44200 20.02 20.02 CLEANING SUPPLIES 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F09923 10-31150-44200 33.36 33.36 DISCS, ROD ROUND 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE F10456 10-31150-44200 19.37 19.37 RING WAX EXTENDER 04/16/2025 47947 ACE HARDWARE I29947 10-31150-44200 156.95 156.95 PARK SUPPLIES Total 47947: 2,334.50
47948
04/16/2025 47948 AKESO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH EM014226 10-22080-4430 252.00 252.00 FIRE DEPT PRE-HIRE Total 47948: 252.00
47949
04/16/2025 47949 ALL VALLEY FENCE & SUPPLY 25-1942 10-31158-44200 762.78 762.78 BOLTS, CAPS, BRACE BANDS Total 47949: 762.78
47950
04/16/2025 47950 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH, INC. INSTALLME 22-80120-4430 1,046,498.74 1,046,498.74 ASPHALT INSTALLMENT #2 Total 47950: 1,046,498.74
47951
04/16/2025 47951 ANITA MEALEY UTILITY REF 11-00000-39610 427.19 427.19 UTILITY REFUND-XPRESS OVERPAYMENT 04/16/2025 47951 ANITA MEALEY UTILITY REF 12-00000-3840 464.24 464.24 UTILITY REFUND-XPRESS OVERPAYMENT 04/16/2025 47951 ANITA MEALEY UTILITY REF 13-00000-3961 197.12 197.12 UTILITY REFUND-XPRESS OVERPAYMENT 04/16/2025 47951 ANITA MEALEY UTILITY REF 11-00000-30650 54.45 54.45 UTILITY REFUND-XPRESS OVERPAYMENT Total 47951: 1,143.00
47952
04/16/2025 47952 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIE 7031741551 12-31610-4420 485.28 485.28 GLOVES, LUBRIPLATE Total 47952: 485.28
47953
04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 10-12001-4425 15.86 15.86 TELEPHONE CHARGES 04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 10-22080-4425 148.61 148.61 TELEPHONE CHARGES 04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 10-21040-4425 489.32 489.32 TELEPHONE CHARGES 04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 11-31520-44250 41.45 41.45 TELEPHONE CHARGES 04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 11-31520-44250 46.85 46.85 TELEPHONE CHARGES 04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 12-31610-4425 86.83 86.83 TELEPHONE CHARGES 04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 12-31620-4425 67.24 67.24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 04/16/2025 47953 AT&T 23300818 10-31150-44250 8.97 8.97 TELEPHONE CHARGES Total 47953: 905.13
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
FIRE DEPT
PW
ADMIN
UTILITIES
PW
ADMIN
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 3 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount 47954
04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51035-22 12-31610-4430 19.81 19.81 AMMONIA LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51036-22 12-31610-4430 39.64 39.64 TOTAL HARDNESS PACKAGE 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51037-22 12-31610-4430 65.65 65.65 OIL AND GREASE 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51072-22 11-31520-44301 39.62 39.62 ALUMINUM LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51084-22 12-31610-4430 183.32 183.32 BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51085-22 12-31610-4430 19.81 19.81 COPPER 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51208-22 11-31520-44301 19.81 19.81 AMMONIA LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51553-22 12-31610-4430 183.32 183.32 BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51624-22 11-31520-44301 19.81 19.81 ALUMINUM LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51625-22 11-31520-44301 792.80 792.80 COPPER 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CC51664-22 11-31520-44301 79.28 79.28 COPPER 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CD50101-22 12-31610-4430 979.14 979.14 ASBESTOS DIOXINS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CD50128-22 11-31520-44301 19.81 19.81 ALUMINUM LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CD50139-22 12-31610-4430 183.32 183.32 BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CD50401-22 12-31610-4430 33.44 33.44 E.COLI LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CD50402-22 12-31610-4430 183.32 183.32 BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. CD50492-22 11-31520-44301 19.81 19.81 ALUMINUM LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. LC50030-227 12-31610-4430 33.44 33.44 E.COLI LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. LC50035-227 12-31610-4430 33.44 33.44 E.COLI LAB ANALYSIS 04/16/2025 47954 BABCOCK & SONS, INC. LD50005-227 11-31520-44301 33.44 33.44 E.COLI LAB ANALYSIS Total 47954: 2,982.03
47955
04/16/2025 47955 BAJA DESERT TIRE S21-23730 11-31520-44280 25.00 25.00 FLAT REPAIR Total 47955: 25.00
47956
04/16/2025 47956 BLU BULK TRANSPORT #9746 MARC 10-31158-44200 3.20 3.20 PUBLIC WORKS WATER Total 47956: 3.20
47957
04/16/2025 47957 BUHS ROCKBAND 04/25 FARM 10-13050-4430 300.00 300.00 FARMERS MARKET 04/25 BAND Total 47957: 300.00
47958
04/16/2025 47958 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA PUBLIC SAF 10-70001-4430 6,500.00 6,500.00 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Total 47958: 6,500.00
47959
04/16/2025 47959 CARROT TOP INDUSTRIES INV138944 10-31158-44200 1,156.76 1,156.76 AMERICAN FLAG 20X30 Total 47959: 1,156.76
47960
04/16/2025 47960 CASELLE, INC. 140321 10-14020-4430 1,761.00 1,761.00 CONTRACT SUPPORT Total 47960: 1,761.00
47961
04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317659 12-31610-4420 1,044.39 1,044.39 FILTERS, CABLE TIE M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
PW
PW
PW
FARMERS MARKET
ADMIN
ADMIN
ADMIN
PW
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 4 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount 04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317672 10-31140-44280 76.67 76.67 HEADLIGHT SWITCH, A/C SWITCH 04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317672 10-31150-44280 76.67 76.67 HEADLIGHT SWITCH, A/C SWITCH 04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317672 11-31510-44280 76.67 76.67 HEADLIGHT SWITCH, A/C SWITCH 04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317672 12-31620-4428 76.66 76.66 HEADLIGHT SWITCH, A/C SWITCH 04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317706 10-31150-44210 127.12 127.12 DRILL SET 04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317835 11-31510-44200 90.38 90.38 OIL 04/16/2025 47961 COUNTY MOTOR PARTS 317835 12-31620-4420 90.38 90.38 OIL Total 47961: 1,658.94
47962
04/16/2025 47962 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RCS 25HOLTFDN 10-22080-4433 649.00 649.00 FIRE DEPT RADIOS 04/16/2025 47962 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RCS 25HOLTFDN 11-31510-44330 14.75 14.75 PUBLIC WORKS RADIOS 04/16/2025 47962 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RCS 25HOLTFDN 12-31620-4433 14.75 14.75 PUBLIC WORKS RADIOS Total 47962: 678.50
47963
04/16/2025 47963 CR&R ENVIRONMENTAL INC 300255 12-31610-4430 4,262.10 4,262.10 WWTP TRASH SERVICE Total 47963: 4,262.10
47964
04/16/2025 47964 CR&R INCORPORATED MARCH 202 13-31710-4430 28,595.81 28,595.81 ADJUSTED GROSS 04/16/2025 47964 CR&R INCORPORATED MARCH 202 10-00000-3145 3,431.50- 3,431.50- FRANCHISE FEES 04/16/2025 47964 CR&R INCORPORATED MARCH 202 13-00000-3849 1,715.75- 1,715.75- ABA 939 04/16/2025 47964 CR&R INCORPORATED MARCH 202 10-00000-3848 1,429.79- 1,429.79- VEHICLE IMPACT FEE Total 47964: 22,018.77
47965
04/16/2025 47965 DANUTA TUSZYNSKA FINAL BILL 11-00000-39610 179.77 179.77 UTILITY FINAL BILL Total 47965: 179.77
47966
04/16/2025 47966 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION-ST OF C SL250548 10-31140-44240 147.99 147.99 SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Total 47966: 147.99
47967
04/16/2025 47967 DRAGON'S EXTERMINATOR 89248529 10-31158-44300 250.00 250.00 MONTHLY PEST Total 47967: 250.00
47968
04/16/2025 47968 EXQUISITE POOL CUSTOM CREATION 8205-1 10-80127-4430 14,750.00 14,750.00 PUMP INSTALLATION Total 47968: 14,750.00
47969
04/16/2025 47969 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. #135 5274931 10-31150-44210 122.12 122.12 RAPTOR PIPE WRENCH 04/16/2025 47969 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. #135 5309501 10-31150-44200 187.27 187.27 FAUCETS 04/16/2025 47969 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. #135 CM671871 10-31150-44210 122.12- 122.12- RAPTOR PIPE WRENCH M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
PW
FIRE DEPT
PW
ADMIN
UTILITIES
ADMIN
PW
PW
PW
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 5 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount Total 47969: 187.27
47970
04/16/2025 47970 FERNANDO RUIZ, INC. 169975 10-31140-43150 87.50 87.50 SAFETY SERVICES 04/16/2025 47970 FERNANDO RUIZ, INC. 169975 10-31150-43150 87.50 87.50 SAFETY SERVICES 04/16/2025 47970 FERNANDO RUIZ, INC. 169975 11-31510-43150 87.50 87.50 SAFETY SERVICES 04/16/2025 47970 FERNANDO RUIZ, INC. 169975 12-31620-4315 87.50 87.50 SAFETY SERVICES 04/16/2025 47970 FERNANDO RUIZ, INC. 169975 11-31520-43150 87.50 87.50 SAFETY SERVICES 04/16/2025 47970 FERNANDO RUIZ, INC. 169975 12-31610-4315 87.50 87.50 SAFETY SERVICES Total 47970: 525.00
47971
04/16/2025 47971 GREEN DIAMOND SERVICES, LLC 983 10-13050-4430 615.00 615.00 RESTROOM RENTALS Total 47971: 615.00
47972
04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-011 11-31520-44303 1,680.00 1,680.00 (116) WTP TANK RECOAT 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-012 22-80049-4430 25,187.50 25,187.50 (532) CITYWIDE STREET IMPROVEMENT 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-018 10-12003-4430 4,091.70 4,091.70 (047) PLANNING COMMISION, ADRESS A 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-019 10-12003-4430 2,856.38 2,856.38 (207) BUILDING PERMITS REVIEW 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-020 10-31140-44302 725.00 725.00 (335) ICTC MEETING UPDATES 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-021 22-80050-4430 4,927.50 4,927.50 (489) TRESTLE BRIDGE TRAIL GRANT 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-022 10-70003-4430 665.00 665.00 (491) SUNSET ROSE SENIOR APARTMENT 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-023 10-80027-4430 575.00 575.00 (499) PINE CROSSING APARTMENTS 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-024 10-12003-4430 795.00 795.00 (510) PLHA PROGRAM GRANT 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-025 22-80043-4430 965.00 965.00 (512) WEST 9TH ST PROJECT 04/16/2025 47972 HOLT GROUP, THE 25-02-026 22-80042-4430 1,510.00 1,510.00 (513) EAST 9TH STREET PROJECT Total 47972: 43,978.08
47973
04/16/2025 47973 HOME DEPOT/GECF 4971720 12-31610-4420 476.39 476.39 WWTP SUPPLIES Total 47973: 476.39
47974
04/16/2025 47974 HUMANE SOCIETY OF IMPERIAL COU JAN-MARCH 10-21070-4432 600.00 600.00 ANIMAL INTAKE AND CARE EXPENSE Total 47974: 600.00
47975
04/16/2025 47975 I.C. SHERIFF'S DEPT 03312025-1 10-21050-4430 8,255.84 8,255.84 DISPATCH SERVICES 04/16/2025 47975 I.C. SHERIFF'S DEPT 03312025-1 10-21040-4430 80,580.20 80,580.20 SHERIFF SERVICES Total 47975: 88,836.04
47976
04/16/2025 47976 IMPERIAL COUNTY 25-23 10-31140-44300 660.08 660.08 2024-25 MEMBERSHIP 3RD Q Total 47976: 660.08
47977
04/16/2025 47977 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT PARKS ELE 10-31150-44240 3,435.37 3,435.37 PARKS ELECTRICITY M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
PW
FARMERS MARKET
ADMIN
PW
ADMIN
ADMIN
ADMIN
ADMIN
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 6 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount Total 47977: 3,435.37
47978
04/16/2025 47978 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (WAT #0303 MARC 11-31520-44350 2,448.00 2,448.00 RAW WATER CHARAGES Total 47978: 2,448.00
47979
04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-808 10-14020-4416 368.14 368.14 REPLY ENVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-808 11-31510-44160 368.15 368.15 REPLY ENVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-808 12-31620-4416 368.15 368.15 REPLY ENVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-809 10-14020-4416 484.87 484.87 ENEVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-809 11-31510-44160 484.88 484.88 ENEVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-809 12-31620-4416 484.88 484.88 ENEVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-810 10-14020-4416 118.20 118.20 ENEVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-810 11-31510-44160 118.21 118.21 ENEVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-810 12-31620-4416 118.20 118.20 ENEVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-811 10-14020-4416 67.26 67.26 REPLY ENVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-811 12-31620-4416 67.26 67.26 REPLY ENVELOPES 04/16/2025 47979 IMPERIAL PRINTERS 25-811 11-31510-44160 67.27 67.27 REPLY ENVELOPES Total 47979: 3,115.47
47980
04/16/2025 47980 IV WATER SPECIALISTS 32625 12-31610-4430 2,325.00 2,325.00 MONTHLY WATER AND WASTEWATER CO 04/16/2025 47980 IV WATER SPECIALISTS 32625 11-31520-44300 2,325.00 2,325.00 MONTHLY WATER AND WASTEWATER CO Total 47980: 4,650.00
47981
04/16/2025 47981 JADE SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 0220450 12-31610-4430 119.97 119.97 MONITOR SECURITY SYSTEM 04/16/2025 47981 JADE SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 0220450 11-31520-44300 119.97 119.97 MONITOR SECURITY SYSTEM 04/16/2025 47981 JADE SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 0222213 12-31610-4430 64.49 64.49 MONITOR SECURITY SYSTEM 04/16/2025 47981 JADE SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. 0222213 11-31520-44300 64.48 64.48 MONITOR SECURITY SYSTEM Total 47981: 368.91
47982
04/16/2025 47982 JOSE LUIS OSUNA BOOTS 2024 12-31610-4314 128.00 128.00 JOSE LUIS OSUNA BOOTS Total 47982: 128.00
47983
04/16/2025 47983 K-C WELDING & RENTAL, INC. 211297 10-31140-44200 287.93 287.93 TARP Total 47983: 287.93
47984
04/16/2025 47984 LA BRUCHERIE IRRIGATION SUPPLY 300601C 10-31150-44200 1,598.69 1,598.69 SPRINLERS, METERS 04/16/2025 47984 LA BRUCHERIE IRRIGATION SUPPLY 300991C 12-31610-4420 323.45 323.45 COUPLINGS, HOSE, NOZZLES Total 47984: 1,922.14
47985
04/16/2025 47985 LEAF 18196952 10-22080-4525 110.00 110.00 XEROX M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
PW
ADMIN
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
PW
FIRE DEPT
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 7 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount Total 47985: 110.00
47986
04/16/2025 47986 LUIS M. ESTRADA 648 11-31520-44280 350.00 350.00 TRUCK REPAIRS Total 47986: 350.00
47987
04/16/2025 47987 METRON - FARNIER 992394871 11-31530-47950 10,873.83 10,873.83 METER, REGISTER, ANTENNAS Total 47987: 10,873.83
47988
04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6054614 10-00000-2029 480.00 480.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-00000-2026 2,226.96 2,226.96 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-00000-2027 667.72 667.72 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-12001-4240 672.00 672.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-14020-4240 255.04 255.04 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-22080-4240 351.81 351.81 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-12003-4240 199.44 199.44 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-21070-4240 42.23 42.23 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-31140-42400 149.00 149.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 10-31150-42400 25.33 25.33 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 11-31530-42400 33.56 33.56 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 11-31510-42400 498.03 498.03 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 11-31520-42400 399.12 399.12 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 12-31610-4240 466.24 466.24 INSURANCE PREMIUM 04/16/2025 47988 MISSIONSQUARE 6935044 12-31620-4240 582.40 582.40 INSURANCE PREMIUM Total 47988: 7,048.88
47989
04/16/2025 47989 PEOPLEREADY,INC. 29066881 12-31610-4140 873.00 873.00 TEMP WORKER WWTP 04/16/2025 47989 PEOPLEREADY,INC. 29077897 12-31610-4140 523.80 523.80 TEMP WORKER WWTP 04/16/2025 47989 PEOPLEREADY,INC. 29082947 10-31150-41400 931.20 931.20 TEMP WORKER PARKS 04/16/2025 47989 PEOPLEREADY,INC. 29082948 12-31610-4140 698.40 698.40 TEMP WORKER WWTP 04/16/2025 47989 PEOPLEREADY,INC. 29088552 12-31610-4140 174.60 174.60 TEMP WORKER WWTP 04/16/2025 47989 PEOPLEREADY,INC. 29092962 10-31150-41400 1,164.00 1,164.00 TEMP WORKER PARKS 04/16/2025 47989 PEOPLEREADY,INC. 29092963 12-31610-4140 873.00 873.00 TEMP WORKER WWTP Total 47989: 5,238.00
47990
04/16/2025 47990 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL S 3107175108 12-31620-4525 198.49 198.49 SENDPRO LEASE 04/16/2025 47990 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL S 3107175108 11-31510-45250 198.49 198.49 SENDPRO LEASE 04/16/2025 47990 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL S 3107175108 10-14020-4525 198.48 198.48 SENDPRO LEASE 04/16/2025 47990 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL S 310717515 12-31620-4416 146.69 146.69 INSERTING MACHINE LEASE 04/16/2025 47990 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL S 310717515 11-31510-45250 146.69 146.69 INSERTING MACHINE LEASE 04/16/2025 47990 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL S 310717515 10-14020-4525 146.69 146.69 INSERTING MACHINE LEASE Total 47990: 1,035.53
47991
04/16/2025 47991 POLYDYNE, INC. 1912698 12-31610-4420 4,232.36 4,232.36 CLARIFLOC M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
PW
PW
ADMIN
PW
ADMIN
PW
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 8 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount Total 47991: 4,232.36
47992
04/16/2025 47992 POOL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 0019872426- 10-80127-4420 59.13 59.13 AB BRUSH Total 47992: 59.13
47993
04/16/2025 47993 QUILL CORPORATION 43340906 10-14020-4416 14.86 14.86 FOLDERS 04/16/2025 47993 QUILL CORPORATION 43340906 10-12003-4416 14.86 14.86 FOLDERS 04/16/2025 47993 QUILL CORPORATION 43340906 10-12001-4416 14.86 14.86 FOLDERS 04/16/2025 47993 QUILL CORPORATION 43357879 10-14020-4416 94.81 94.81 PRINTER DRUM Total 47993: 139.39
47994
04/16/2025 47994 REXEL USA, INC. S142165137. 10-31150-44200 219.84 219.84 LAMPS Total 47994: 219.84
47995
04/16/2025 47995 ROTO ROOTER 219150 10-22080-4430 140.00 140.00 FIRE DEPT PLUMBING SERVICES Total 47995: 140.00
47996
04/16/2025 47996 RUBIO MEDINA, ARCHITECT 2304-032025 10-70001-4430 15,700.70 15,700.70 PUBIC SAFETY BUILDING PLANNING Total 47996: 15,700.70
47997
04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43874 10-22080-4427 177.12 177.12 FIRE DEPT FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 10-12003-4427 55.05 55.05 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 10-21070-4427 210.71 210.71 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 10-31150-44270 774.86 774.86 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 11-31510-44270 167.60 167.60 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 11-31530-44270 167.66 167.66 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 11-31520-44270 487.96 487.96 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 12-31610-4427 50.04 50.04 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL 04/16/2025 47997 SELLERS PETROLEUM CL43875-IN 12-31620-4427 134.87 134.87 PUBLIC WORKS FUEL Total 47997: 2,225.87
47998
04/16/2025 47998 SERVICE MASTER 35518 10-31158-44300 2,089.00 2,089.00 JANITORIAL SERVICE Total 47998: 2,089.00
47999
04/16/2025 47999 SPARKLETTS 9431538 040 10-31158-44200 469.07 469.07 PW WATER 04/16/2025 47999 SPARKLETTS 9439337 040 10-22080-4420 131.34 131.34 FIRE DEPT WATER Total 47999: 600.41
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
PW
PW
PW
FIRE DEPT
ADMIN
PW
FIRE DEPT
ADMIN
PW
FIRE DEPT
City of Holtville Check Register - DETAILS REPORT Page: 9 Live 4.17.2022 Check Issue Dates: 4/4/2025 - 4/24/2025 Apr 24, 2025 02:30PM Check Check Invoice Invoice Invoice Check Description
Issue Date Number Payee Number GL Account Amount Amount 48000
04/16/2025 48000 TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING LLC 8 INV112770 10-22080-4313 214.40 214.40 TRAINING PLATFORM 04/16/2025 48000 TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING LLC 8 INV114205 10-22080-4313 214.40 214.40 TRAINING PLATFORM Total 48000: 428.80
48001
04/16/2025 48001 THE CRISCOM COMPANY 271495 10-11011-44300 4,500.00 4,500.00 ADVOCACY GRANT WRITING Total 48001: 4,500.00
48002
04/16/2025 48002 TRACTOR SUPPLY CREDIT PLAN 200233022 10-31140-44200 166.07 166.07 BRUSH, SAW, WRENCHES Total 48002: 166.07
48003
04/16/2025 48003 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1020240333 10-31140-44300 47.00 47.00 NEW TICKET CHARGES 04/16/2025 48003 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 320250341 10-31140-44300 19.25 19.25 NEW TICKET CHARGES Total 48003: 66.25
48004
04/16/2025 48004 USA BLUEBOOK INV0054702 11-31520-44200 376.84 376.84 TURBIDITY AMPULE KIT Total 48004: 376.84
48005
04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 10-31158-44200 224.71 224.71 WORKPLACE SUPPLIES 04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 12-31610-4314 604.37 604.37 UNIFORM CHARGES 04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 11-31520-43140 488.72 488.72 UNIFORM CHARGES 04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 11-31530-43140 117.16 117.16 UNIFORM CHARGES 04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 10-31150-43140 109.84 109.84 UNIFORM CHARGES 04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 10-31140-43140 109.84 109.84 UNIFORM CHARGES 04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 11-31510-43140 197.72 197.72 UNIFORM CHARGES 04/16/2025 48005 VESTIS #2000 MARC 12-31620-4314 197.72 197.72 UNIFORM CHARGES Total 48005: 2,050.08
48006
04/16/2025 48006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 83147085 10-22080-4420 185.33 185.33 CLEANING SUPPLIES 04/16/2025 48006 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 83162352 10-22080-4420 139.79 139.79 CLEANING SUPPLIES Total 48006: 325.12
Grand Totals: 1,320,201.01
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
FIRE DEPT
PW
PW
PW
PW
ADMIN
PW
City of Holtville City Council Meeting
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) – April 28, 2025 Page 1 of 6 116.489 – Southwest corner of the City of Holtville/Staff Report & Reso City of Holtville
Report to City Council
To: Nicholas D. Wells, City Manager
Holtville Planning Commission
From: Jeorge Galvan, AICP, City Planner
Prepared By: Melany Amarillas, Associate Planner
Date: April 28, 2025
Project: The Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge Project – Certification of Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)
SUMMARY:
Project Location: Southwest corner of the City of Holtville within the incorporated City limits and above the Alamo River
(APN 045-243-005) (see Attachment A – Project Location
Map)
Pending Action: Adopt Resolution CC 25-11 certifying Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alamo River Trail Trestle
Bridge Project
Zoning: (OS) Open Space
General Plan: (OS) Open Space
Environmental: Subject to Review by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
The City of Holtville applied for grant funding to the Recreational Trails and Gateway Grant Program administered by the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) in 2020. The Recreational Trails and Gateway Grant provides grant funding for non-motorized infrastructure development and enhancements that promote new or alternate access to parks or other natural environments. The City of Holtville was awarded grant monies in the amount of $1,262,000. The scope of work consists of installing pedestrian decking on the bridge and constructing trail side amenities along the pathway leading to the bridge. The bridge will utilize materials suitable for non-motorized traffic including pedestrians, bicycles, and equestrian users. Amenities such as landscaping, benches, and signage will Meeting Date: April 28, 2025
Item Number: _____3 a_________
City Manager ______________
Finance Manager ______________
ApprovalsCity Attorney ______________
City of Holtville City Council Meeting
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) – April 28, 2025 Page 2 of 6 116.489 – Southwest corner of the City of Holtville/Staff Report & Reso also be installed along the trail pathway leading up to the bridge. The trestle bridge project would be a linkage connecting the existing Alamo River Trail to Phase II of the trail project which will ultimately connect to the Holtville Wetlands. Recreation of the trestle bridge would give the public more recreational opportunities within the community. Kleinfelder Engineering is currently preparing the design plans and are approximately 92% complete.
ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION AND REVIEW
The project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and therefore must be reviewed to ensure that any potential impacts to the environment be identified and addressed. A draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA which covers 21 environmental categories. Less than significant impacts were identified for the following categories: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Recreation, Transportation, Wildfire, and Mandatory Findings of Significance. Potential impacts were identified related to Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Hydrology and Water Quality. Mitigation measures were identified to reduce the levels of impact to less-thansignificant impacts.
On December 16, 2024, the draft IS/MND was presented to the public and Planning Commission for approval to submit the draft IS/MND to the State Clearinghouse and to initiate the 30-day public review period. After reviewing all pertinent information and opening the floor for public comments, the Planning Commission instructed staff to proceed with the submittal of the draft IS/MND and the initiation of the 30-day public review period.
A Notice of Intent was posted at the County of Imperial to initiate the 30-day public review period from December 27, 2024 to January 27, 2025 and provide an opportunity for local agencies to comment on the subject matter. The draft IS/MND and a Notice of Completion Transmittal Form and other applicable attachments were submitted via the State Clearinghouse website for a review period from December 30, 2024 to January 28, 2025. Comments from the California Department of Transportation, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife were received during the review period.
Staff proceeded to prepare a revised IS/MND to address all comments received. On March 17, 2025, the revised IS/MND was presented to the Planning Commission where it was recommended for approval to the City Council. Therefore, the purpose of this item is to present the Final IS/MND to the City Council for review and certification. Upon reviewing all pertinent information and considering public comments, the City Council will have the opportunity to certify the Final IS/MND. A summary of the comments received and modifications made to the Final IS/MND are stated on Table 1 below. For additional information regarding the comments, please refer to Attachment D – Final IS/MND.
City of Holtville City Council Meeting
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) – April 28, 2025 Page 3 of 6 116.489 – Southwest corner of the City of Holtville/Staff Report & Reso Table 1: List of Comments and Responses
Comments Responses
California Department of Transportation – January 23, 2025 • The Department of Transportation may
issue a special permit to operate or move
vehicles of a size or weight exceeding the
maximum limitations specified in the
California Vehicle Code.
• An encroachment permit will be required
for any work within their Right-of-Way prior
to construction. Perpetuation of survey
monuments by a licensed land surveyor is
required, if they are being destroyed by any
construction.
• The following mitigation measures were added
to the revised IS/MND as a response to the
California Department of Transportation:
Implement Mitigation Measure- TRANSP-1:
Department of Transportation Hauling/Traffic
Permit
Implement Mitigation Measure- TRANSP-2:
Department of Transportation Encroachment
Permit
Implement Mitigation Measure- TRANSP-3:
Perpetuation of Monuments
Imperial County Air Pollution Control District – January 28, 2025 • Provides a reminder that the project must
comply with all Imperial County Air
Pollution Control District rules and
regulations.
• Minor edits to the description on the Air
Quality section of the Draft IS/MND were added
to stipulate compliance with all Imperial County
Air Pollution Control District rules and
regulations.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife – January 31, 2025 • Project description doesn’t specify if
activities will occur in the Alamo River. If
the project impacts the resources, then the
final IS/MND requires notification for an
LSA agreement along with required
mitigation measures to reduce impacts.
• Concern is expressed about the potential of
special status species being on or near the
project site since their determination of the
biological survey timing and scope was
deemed to be insufficient to detect all
status species on or near the site.
• The biological report prepared by the City
in 2016 is outdated and evaluation of the
environmental baseline should be
• No work will be conducted on the river bed and
the following mitigation measures were
modified and added to the revised IS/MND as a
response to the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife:
Implement Mitigation Measure- BIO-5: LSA
Agreement
Implement Mitigation Measure- BIO-6
Biological Survey
Implement Mitigation Measure- BIO-7:
Swallow Nesting
Implement Mitigation Measure- BIO-8: Bat
Species
Implement Mitigation Measure- BIO-9: Yuma
Ridgway Rail Survey
Implement Mitigation Measure- BIO-10:
City of Holtville City Council Meeting
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) – April 28, 2025 Page 4 of 6 116.489 – Southwest corner of the City of Holtville/Staff Report & Reso reconducted using proper surveying
guidance.
• The biological report prepared by the City
in 2016 identified cliff swallows
(Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) near the
project site, but the draft IS/MND does not
described potential impacts nor mitigation
to reduce any potential impact for these
species.
• The MND does not sufficiently identify and
evaluate potential Project impacts to bat
species.
• The IS/MND does not sufficiently identify
potential Project impacts to Yuma
Ridgway’s rail (Rallus obsoletus
yumanensis). The 2016 biological report
prepared by the City is out of date and
recommends that protocol-level surveys
be conducted to determine the presence
or absence of Yuma Ridgway’s rail on the
Project site and a 500-foot buffer.
• The project site potentially contains
suitable habitat for western burrowing
owl, a CESA-listed candidate species. The
draft IS/MND does not analyze temporal
consideration of species occupancy and
their use of the surrounding landscape for
survival.
• The draft IS/MND provides no avoidance
to arrow-weed thickets.
• The project activities may result in the
degradation and permanent loss of nesting
bird habitats along the Alamo River
Walking Trail.
• The draft IS/MND does not include an
assessment of impacts to biological
resources resulting from construction
noise.
Burrowing Owl Breeding and Non-breeding
Surveys
Implement BIO-11: Arrow-weed Thickets
Modify BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey
Modify BIO-3: Noise Mitigation Program
Modify BIO-4: Burrowing Owl
Implement BIO-13: Education Program
City of Holtville City Council Meeting
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) – April 28, 2025 Page 5 of 6 116.489 – Southwest corner of the City of Holtville/Staff Report & Reso • The draft IS/MND does not analyze
impacts to biological resources from
artificial nighttime lighting. CDFW
recommends that a revised MND include a
light impact assessment and an analysis of
impacts to biological resources
accompanied.
• The draft IS/MND describes that since the
time of surveying, western burrowing owl
could have potentially inhabited the site.
CDFW recommends to make changes to
mitigation measure BIO-4 and the
inclusion of mitigation measure BIO-13.
PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with the requirements of CEQA, a Notice of Public Hearing (Attachment B - Public Hearing Notice) was published at the Holtville Tribune on April 17, 2025, mailed out to all property owners within a 300-foot radius on April 18, 2025, and posted at City Hall on April 21, 2025.
NEXT STEPS
Once reviewed and certified by the City Council, City staff will prepare a Notice of Determination and submit environmental documents to the State Clearinghouse for closure. It is important to note that after submittal to the State Clearinghouse, the City may begin the grant’s reimbursement process.
Unless unforeseen circumstances occur, the following schedule of events is proposed:
Adopt and Certify MND April 2025
Advertise for Bids May 2025
Open Bids June 2025
Award Construction Contract June 2025
Start Construction July 2025
End Construction July 2026
Grant Closeout August 2026
Grant Expiration March 2027
City of Holtville City Council Meeting
Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) – April 28, 2025 Page 6 of 6 116.489 – Southwest corner of the City of Holtville/Staff Report & Reso
CITY COUNCIL PENDING ACTION
Adopt Resolution CC 25-11 certifying the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge Project.
Attachments: Attachment A – Vicinity Map
Attachment B – Notice of Public Hearing
Attachment C – Resolution CC 25-11
Attachment D – Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment A – Vicinity Map
HWY 115/EVAN HEWES
HWY 115
FIFTH STREET
SIXTH STREET
SEVENTH STREET
MELON AVENUE
EARL
WALKER
PARK
El Centro, California 92243
ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING
The Holt Group, Inc.
1601 N. Imperial Ave. (760)337-3883
NOT TO SCALE
ALAMO RIVER
TRESTLE BRIDGE TRAIL
HOLTVILLE, CA THG Project No. 116.489
Date: 12/06/2024
VICINITY MAP
Project Area City Limits Property Line
APN 045-243-005
Owner: City of Holtville
Attachment B – Notice of Public Hearing
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice of Public Hearing
City of Holtville
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City of Holtville City Council at the date, time, and place indicated below. The purpose of the public hearing will be to hear comments from the public regarding the following subject:
The City of Holtville was awarded grant funds to repair the Trestle Bridge in the amount of $1,262,000 by the Recreational Trails and Gateway Grant Program administered by the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) in 2020. The reconstruction of the Trestle Bridge will consist of installing pedestrian decking on the bridge and constructing trail side amenities along the pathway leading to the bridge. All projects that may have a substantial impact on the environment are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Upon preparing a draft MND, the environmental documents were circulated for a 30-day review period and a revised MND was prepared to address the comments received..On March 17, 2025, the revised MND was presented to the Planning Commission where it was recommended for approval to the City Council. Therefore, the purpose of this meeting is to present the Final MND to both the public and City Council for review and certification.
City Council Hearing Date: April 28, 2025
Hearing Time: 6:00 PM
Hearing Location: Holtville City Hall
121 W. 5th Street
Copies of pertinent information are available for review at the City Hall during regular business hours.
If you would like to know more about the proposed project prior to the public hearing, please contact Melany Amarillas, Associate Planner, at (760) 337-3883 or via email at [email protected].
Any person desiring to comment on the above project may do so in writing or may appear in person at the public hearing. Written comments should be directed to the Holtville City Clerk, 121 West 5th Street, Holtville, CA 92250 and be delivered prior to the Public Hearing date. Please reference the project name in all written correspondence Legal 9249 Publish: April 17, 2025
Project:
Certification of the Final Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) for the
Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge Project
Location:
Southwestern edge of the City Limits of the City of
Holtville (APN: 045-243-005)
Attachment C – Resolution CC 25-11
RESOLUTION NO. 25-11 CC
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOLTVILLE CERTIFYING
THE FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ALAMO
RIVER TRESTLE BRIDGE TRAIL PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Holtville applied for grant funding to the Recreational Trails and Gateway Grant Program administered by the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) in 2020; and WHEREAS, the City of Holtville was awarded grant monies in the amount of $1,262,000 to reconstruct the Trestle Bridge and construct trail side amenities along the pathway leading to the bridge; and
WHEREAS, the Alamo River Trestle Bridge Trail is subject for review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the City of Holtville staff prepared a draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and was posted for a 30-day public review period and was submitted to the State Clearinghouse upon recommendation by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the draft IS/MND received comments from the California Department of Transportation, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife during the 30-day review period; and
WHEREAS, a revised IS/MND was prepared addressing the comments received and upon review and consideration by the Planning Commission on March 17, 2025, the IS/MND was recommended for review and certification to the City Council; and WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was published in a local newspaper on April 17, 2025, mailed out to all property owners within a 300-foot radius on April 18, 2025, and posted at City Hall on April 21, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly public hearing on April 28, 2025 to review all pertinent information and to hear public comments for the Alamo River Trestle Bridge Trail Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
NOW THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Holtville hereby certifies the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alamo River Trestle Bridge Trail project based on the following findings:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct; and B) That the foregoing has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements set forth by the City of Holtville for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act; and PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Holtville, California held on this 28th day of April 2025. ______________________________
Mike Goodsell, Mayor
I, Yvette Rios, City Clerk of the City of Holtville, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution 25-11 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Holtville at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of April 2025, and that the same was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Yvette Rios, City Clerk
Attachment D – Final Initial Study/
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
City of Holtville
Final Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration
April 2025
1. Project Title: The Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge
2. Lead Agency:
Name, Address
& Phone
City of Holtville
121 W. Fifth Street
Holtville, CA 92250
Contact: Jeorge Galvan, AICP
(760) 337-3883
[email protected]
3. Project
Sponsor:
Name, Address
& Phone
City of Holtville
121 W. Fifth Street
Holtville, CA 92250
Contact: Jeorge Galvan, AICP
(760) 337-3883
4. Project
Location:
Map Attached
The proposed project site is located within a 5.91-acre parcel, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 045-243-005, at the southwest corner of the City of Holtville within the incorporated city limits and above the Alamo River (Please see Exhibit A – Regional Location Map and Exhibit B – Project Vicinity Map).
5. Project
Description:
The Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge was constructed around circa 1904 with a length of about 350 feet, is an open deck bridge consisting of several short spans and is supported by a system of splayed vertical structural elements. A particular feature of this trestle is the apparent composite of both a timber bent system at both ends and a steel space truss system in the middle. The steel truss occupies the mid one-third of the length of the trestle and is bolted with rivet type connections. The steel rails have long been removed by A & K Railroad Materials for salvage use. As such, the remaining transverse timber beams, spaced at about 2 to 3 feet on center, form the current main top surface of the deck. These transverse beams are about 7-1/2 inch wide by 9-1/2 inch deep over the longitudinal wood girders and increase to 9-1/2 by 16 inches over the top chords of the steel truss. On each end of the transverse beams, a 3-foot-wide metal grating sidewalk supported by double cantilevered wood rafters provides access and adds to the total width of the trestle top deck. A set of 3'-6" tall vertical metal angles at about 3’ on center are bolted to the tips of the double cantilevers to form a handrail system with horizontal cables. In August of 2009 a fire occurred in the vicinity of the trestle bridge which resulted in significant damage.
A 2010 visual review of the trestle bridge found that the deck, support cross beams, grating, railings, and bents were completely damaged and in need of full replacement.
The trestle bridge repair will result in the replacement of the damaged structural bent timbers, structural cross beams, and other structural components. More specifically, the rehabilitation will consist of the demolition and replacement of the damaged portions of the bridge (approximately 1,000 square feet), and the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
installation of 3,500 square feet of bridge decking suitable for non-motorized trail users, 350 linear feet of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant bridge railings suitable for pedestrians and bicycles, and 350 square feet of bridge landing suitable for the transition between the bridge and the existing Alamo River Trail. The damaged structures will be replaced with timber, when feasible, to match the nondamaged portion of the bridge and restore the aesthetic appeal of the bridge. Of the eighteen (18) bents that act as key support systems and hold up the bridge deck between spans, only one bent located on the river bank approximately twenty-six (26) feet west of the river bed will be replaced. No work will be conducted on the river bed. The improvements will result in the repair and conversion of the existing trestle bridge into a multimodal pathway suitable for non-motorized users including pedestrians, bicycles and equestrian traffic.
The project will also include improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail aimed at extending the trail to connect to the trestle bridge walkway. The trail improvements will consist of an 8-foot wide, 12 inch deep, class 2 base trail continuation section from the east edge of the Alamo River Bridge to the existing 8-foot-wide plain cement concrete trail. Additional improvements include trail side amenities consisting of 45,000 square feet of mulch, fifteen (15) trees from fifteen (15) gallon containers, thirty-five (35) each of bushes, shrubs, and grasses, six (6) benches, two (2) informational kiosks, four (4) “No Motor Vehicles” signs, and one (1) funding acknowledgement sign. All proposed landscaping will comply with the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and have its own irrigation consisting of drip fittings and tree bubblers.
6. General Plan
Designation:
City Existing: Open Space
Proposed: No Change
The proposed project will further program number 6 of the Circulation Element of the 2017 General Plan which consists of developing a pedestrian and bicycle network with the goal of connecting public, residential, and business areas within the City of Holtville.
7. Zoning: City Existing: Open Space
Proposed: No Change
The proposed project will further the intent of Open Space zones which is to provide open spaces for the preservation of natural resources, managed production of resources, outdoor recreation, the protection of public health and safety, and the preservation of natural scenic areas for the existing and future population.
8. Surrounding
Land Uses
and Setting:
The properties bordering the north and west boundaries of the project site are undeveloped while to the south and east boundary lie State Highway 115 managed by the California Department of Transportation. Project activities will not encroach into neighboring properties and will remain within the project site.
9. Other Agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)
a) California Water Resources Control Board
10. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun? While the City of Holtville has not received a request for consultation for the project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 3 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, the draft IS/MND was sent to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) during a 30-day review period for review and comments. As of the preparation of this revised MND, no comments from the NAHC were received.
NOTE: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 4 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
EXHIBIT A – REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 5 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
EXHIBIT B – THE ALAMO RIVER TRAIL TRESTLE BRIDGE
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 6 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agricultural and
Forestry Resources X Air Quality
X Biological Resources X Cultural Resources Energy
X Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazard & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/Water
Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation X Transportation Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities/Service
Systems Wildfire X Mandatory Findings of Significance
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DETERMINATION:
On the basis of the attached Initial Study, the City of Holtville’s Environmental Review Committee finds that:
The proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment; however, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a “Potentially Significant Impact” or “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated.” A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (1) have been analyzed in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. No further action is required.
CA Department of Fish and Game VOTE
No Impact Finding Requested Yes No Abstain Members of the EEC X Public Works
X Police
X Fire
Jeorge Galvan, AICP, City Planner Date X Planning
X Finance
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 7 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 8 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Background:
The main proponent of the proposed project consists of the demolition and replacement of the damaged structural bent timbers, cross beams, and other structural components of the trestle bridge along with the installation of new decking to serve as a multimodal pathway suitable for non-motorized users including pedestrians, bicycles and equestrian traffic. Additional improvements consist of extending the existing Alamo River Trail to connect to the trestle bridge and the addition of trail side amenities such as landscaping, benches, and signage. The trestle bridge dates to 1904 where it served freight rail traffic up to 1995 when said traffic ceased operation. The trestle bridge is composed of both a timber bent system at both ends and a steel space truss system in the middle making for a unique landmark in the City of Holtville visible to pedestrian traffic along the Alamo River Trail and vehicular traffic traveling through State Highway 115 just south of the bridge. The materials making up the trestle bridge complement the City of Holtville’s historic architecture which includes classical revival, mission revival, and California desert architectural styles. As such, all damaged segments of the trestle bridge will be replaced with materials intended to match the nondamaged portions of the bridge and conserve its aesthetic design to the maximum extent possible. Once completed, the pedestrian walkway atop the trestle bridge will provide an overhead view of the Alamo River which consists of undisturbed land with overgrown brush and arrowweed, salt cedar, quail bush, iodine bush, phragmites, mesquite, desert mistletoe, creosote, and five hook bassia. Upon completion, the extension of the existing Alamo River Trail to the trestle bridge will provide more recreational amenities and improve public access to the bridge’s visual character and quality of the Alamo River open space. The project does not include any changes or alterations to the Alamo River and will only replace damaged portions of the trestle bridge with the same or similar materials, install a pedestrian walking trail on the deck of the bridge, and pave the existing unpaved portions of the Alamo River Trail up to the trestle bridge. Thus, the project will preserve the surrounding area and minimize all aesthetic impacts to the lowest extent possible. Therefore, there will be no significant adverse impacts to the aesthetics of the surrounding areas.
I. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantially adverse effect on a
scenic vista? X
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway?
X
c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
X
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 9 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Aesthetics Impact Discussion:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? - No Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. To preserve the visual aesthetic of the trestle bridge, the materials used for replacement will be the same or similar to the nondamaged segments of the bridge. The trestle bridge overlooks the Alamo River, which provides a scenic view of the natural areas along the river. By repairing the bridge and establishing a pedestrian walkway, the City of Holtville will be opening the scenic view to the public while retaining its aesthetic properties. The improvements to the Alamo River Trail will replace the existing gravel portions of the trail and add additional amenities to make it more accessible to the public and protect the natural aesthetics of the Alamo River by limiting pedestrian traffic to an established walking and bicycle trail. Therefore, the project will not result in any adverse effects on a scenic vista. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? - No Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. The project will not damage, alter, or remove any scenic resources from the Alamo River. The project will instead repair and improve an existing structure and walking trail through the addition of native landscaping and trail side amenities along the existing trail. Furthermore, the California Department of Transportation does not list any scenic highways near the project site. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? - Less Than Significant Impact - The trestle bridge provides an overhead view of the Alamo River which currently consists of undisturbed land with overgrown brush and arrowweed, salt cedar, quail bush, iodine bush, phragmites, mesquite, desert mistletoe, creosote, and five hook bassia. The Alamo River Trail takes advantage of this natural scenery by implementing a pedestrian trail to give users an accessible public trail and protecting the natural aesthetics of the Alamo River by limiting nonmotorized traffic to an established walking and bicycle trail. The project will provide a unique view of the wildlife along the Almo River via the repair of the trestle bridge, installing a multimodal walkway on the deck of the bridge, and completing the improvements to the Alamo River Trail. Rather than degrade the existing public view, the project will further enhance it via the creation of a new vista at the top of the bridge.
Additionally, the proposed project furthers the goal of the City of Holtville Zoning Ordinance as it is located within an open space zone which is intended for the preservation of natural resources, managing production of resources, outdoor recreation, protection of public health and safety, and preservation of natural scenic areas for the existing and future population. Therefore, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? - Less Than Significant Impact - The proposed project does not include any structures or building materials with highly reflective properties such as glass or high gloss surface colors that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. While solar bollard lights are proposed for the pedestrian walkway, said fixtures are intended to ensure the health and safety of the public utilizing the bridge and will have all lighting fixtures directed on the walkway away from the Alamo River and surrounding properties. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 10 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
X
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract? X
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
X
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use? X
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
X
Background:
The Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge was constructed around circa 1904 where it operated as a bridge for freight rail traffic until it was decommissioned in 1995. Since its decommissioning the bridge remained unutilized until its acquisition by the City of Holtville and plans to convert it into a multimodal walkway went underway. The Alamo River Trail was officially opened to the public in 2016 and continues to operate as an accessible trail for public use. The project site is unsuitable for agricultural use given its proximity to the Alamo River and the sloped topographical nature of the surrounding land. There is also no history of prior agricultural uses in or near the project site. Furthermore, neither the United States Forest Service nor the Bureau of Land Management identify any forest lands within the County of Imperial where the proposed project is located.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 11 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Agricultural Resources Impact Discussion:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? - No Impact - The trestle bridge served as a bridge for freight rail traffic from 1904 to 1995 where it was decommissioned and remained unused for decades. While the City of Holtville Zoning Ordinance allows specific agricultural uses within Open Space zones, the proximity to the Alamo River and sloped topography makes the land unsuitable for agricultural uses. Thus, there is no history of the project site being utilized for agricultural uses. Furthermore, the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program classifies the project site as other land which includes vacant nonagricultural land as part of its description. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on important farmland. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? - No Impact - The proposed project site is zoned Open Space which is intended for the preservation of natural resources, managing production of resources, outdoor recreation, protection of public health and safety, and preservation of natural scenic areas for the existing and future population.
While limited agricultural uses are permitted in Open Space zones, the proximity to the Alamo River and topography makes it unsuitable for agricultural uses. Furthermore, the surrounding properties are all zoned industrial and residential mixed-use which do not permit agricultural uses nor are they within a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 511040(g))? - No Impact - According to the United States Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, there are no forest lands nor timber lands within the County of Imperial where the proposed project is located. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on both forest and timber lands. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? - No Impact - As previously mentioned, neither the United States Forest Service nor the Bureau of Land Management identify forest lands nor timber lands within the County of Imperial where the proposed project is located. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on forest and timber lands.
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? - No Impact - As previously mentioned, the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program classifies the project site as other land or vacant nonagricultural land while both the United States Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management lists zero forests within the County of Imperial where the proposed project is located. Therefore, there is no risk of converting farmland into nonagricultural uses nor forest land into non forest use. Thus, the proposed project will have no impact.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 12 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? X
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
X
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations? X
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading
to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people?
X
Background:
The project site is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin. The Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) is responsible for ensuring that all State and Federal ambient air quality standards are achieved and maintained within the County of Imperial. The County of Imperial is designated as a “nonattainment” area with respect to Federal Standards for both particulate matter (PM10) and ozone (smog).
Rural single-family homes are within a quarter mile of the project site and immediate vicinity which are considered sensitive receptors. Grading and construction activities of the proposed project may generate significant amounts of dust (PM 10). It is estimated that construction will take approximately two (2) months to complete. Mitigation measures will need to be incorporated to lessen impacts from dust, in accordance with ICAPCD regulations. Additionally, the project will comply with all ICAPCD rules and regulations.
Air Quality Impact Discussion:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? - Less Than Significant Impact - Operation of the proposed railroad bridge repair and Alamo River Trail improvements will not result in emissions of significant quantities of criteria pollutants listed in the California Ambient Air Quality Standards or toxic air contaminants as identified by the California Air Resources Board, nor will it obstruct the implementation of any air quality plan.
ICAPCD requires all construction projects to acquire a permit prior to any construction activities.
Rather than conflict or obstruct the implementation of an air quality plan, the City of Holtville will require the preparation of a dust control plan and the implementation of air quality measures as required by ICAPCD. Therefore, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact to any applicable air quality plans.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated - The County of Imperial is a nonattainment area for both particulate matter (PM10) and ozone. Vehicle trips will be generated by the proposed project during construction. According to ICAPCD, projects that generate less than 2,000 average daily trips (ADT) are below the screening level criteria.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 13 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Thus, Short-term emissions resulting from construction activities will need to be reduced through the implementation of mitigation measures incorporated into the project. It is estimated that construction will take approximately two (2) months to be completed.
Mitigation Measures
AQ-1: Dust Control Plan
The contractor shall submit a Dust Control Plan identifying all sources of PM10 Emissions to ICAPCD for approval. Construction of the project site will be subject to the requirements of ICAPCD Rule 800, Fugitive Dust Requirement for control of fine particulate matter (PM10). • Inactive Construction Areas: Apply non-toxic soil stabilizers, dust suppressants, tarps, or other suitable material to all inactive construction areas. Visible emissions shall be limited to 20% opacity for dust emissions.
• Active Site Area: Water active site areas twice daily or as needed to comply with Regulation VIII.
• Storage Piles: Control dust for material storage piles by either enclosing, covering and watering twice daily or as needed to comply with Regulation VIII. Outdoor storage of fine particulate material is prohibited.
• Hauling: All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials shall be covered, unless six inches of freeboard space from the top of the container is maintained with no spillage. In addition, the cargo compartment of all haul trucks is to be cleaned or washed at the delivery site after removal of bulk material.
• Adjacent Roadways: Pave permanent roads as quickly as possible to minimize dust.
Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the project site. Sweep streets at the end of the day.
• Unpaved Roads and Parking/Staging Areas: Apply water three times daily, dust suppress or chemically stabilize with non-toxic soils all unpaved roads and parking. Visible emissions shall be limited to 20% opacity.
• Speed Limit: Traffic speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 5 miles per hour. • Construction Roadways: Pave construction roads that have a traffic volume of more than 50 daily trips. Access roads leading into the construction site shall be paved at least 25 feet from the main road.
• Disturbed Areas: When active construction ceases on the site, replace ground cover as quickly as possible.
• Track Out or Carry Out: Track out will be cleaned at the end of each workday or immediately when mud or dirt extends a cumulative distance of 50 linear feet or more onto a paved road within an urban area.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
AQ-2: Air Quality Measures
The Applicant shall ensure the following air quality measures are shown on applicable grading permits:
a. Construction of the project site will be subject to the requirements of the Imperial County Air Pollution Control Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Combustion Equipment:
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 14 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
• Use of alternative fueled or catalyst equipped diesel construction equipment, including all off-road and portable diesel-powered equipment. • Minimize idling time either by shutting equipment when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes as a maximum.
• Limit, to the extent feasible, the hours of operation of heavy-duty equipment and/or the amount of equipment in use.
• Replace fossil fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via a portable generator set).
• Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications; fuel off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generators sets, compressors, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel. b. To provide a greater degree of reduction of PM10 emissions from construction combustion equipment per Air Pollution Control District recommendations, the project shall curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations; this may include ceasing of construction activity during the peak hour of vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways.
c. The proposed project shall further implement activity management (e.g. rescheduling activities to reduce short-term impacts).
Timing/Implementation: During Construction/Contractor
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrates? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated - The proposed project is located within a quarter of a mile of existing residences. The potential increase in emissions within this area and region, as a result of the construction of the proposed project in addition to other related activities have the potential to contribute to the generation of pollutant concentrates. The project will need to incorporate dust control measures in accordance with ICAPCD regulations for dust control during construction activities. It is estimated that construction will take approximately two (2) months to be completed. Mitigation measures have been incorporated to mitigate any potential impacts caused by the project.
Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Dust Control Plan
Implement Mitigation Measure AQ-2: Air Quality Measures d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? - Less Than Significant Impact - The proposed project is adjacent to vacant parcels and State Highway 115 which are within a quarter of a mile from the nearest sensitive receptor (residential zone) and at a lower elevation from said receptors making the generation of odors above what is normal in the area unlikely during construction. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 15 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
X
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
X
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
X
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
X
Background:
A formal biological survey was conducted in June of 2016 for the City of Holtville Alamo River Wetlands Walking Trail project which stretches approximately 1.3 miles from Earl Walker Park, 500 feet south of the project site, to the City of Holtville Wetlands north of the project site. While the survey spans the length of the proposed Alamo River Walking trail, the trestle bridge project is well within the biological surveys scope given that the trestle bridge and portions of the trail to be improved are part of the overall Alamo River Trail project. The 2016 biological survey concluded by stating that no riparian habitats nor any endangered, threatened, or species of concern would be affected (See Appendix A - Biological Report). Nonetheless, the age of the survey coupled with potential disturbance from construction activities within this area may potentially impact the biological resources in the area thus requiring mitigation measures to reduce the impact to less than significant.
Biological Resources Impact Discussion:
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 16 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation is Incorporated - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. The 2016 biological survey determined that no endangered, threatened, or species of concern would be affected by the Alamo River Trail project which encompasses the proposed trestle bridge repairs and trail improvements. The survey further focused on searching for signs of Burrowing Owl (BUOW) activity but made no such findings and determined that the habitat is not favorable to burrowing and that the burrowing owl would not be expected in the trail area which includes the project site. While the survey did not identify any impact on endangered, threatened, or species of concern, the survey’s age is a concern since it does not fully account for the current conditions of the project site and the single survey may not address all potential impacts to biological resources in the area. Therefore, the City of Holtville will implement the following measures as recommended by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW):
Mitigation Measures
BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey
To minimize avoid impacts to nesting birds in the Project Site, the Qualified Avian Biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys of all potential raptor and passerine nesting habitat within the Project Site. The raptor survey shall focus on potential nest sites (i.e., utility poles and trees) within a 300-foot buffer around the Project site. These surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to ground-disturbing activities. The Qualified Avian Biologist must be able to determine the status and stage of nesting migratory birds and all locally breeding passerine and raptor species without causing intrusive disturbance.
If active nests are found, within the Project area or within 500 feet of the Project area, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans and a suitable buffer based on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance, and as determined by the Qualified Avian Biologist shall be established around active nests, and no construction within the buffer shall be allowed until the Qualified Avian Biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., the nestlings have fledged and are no longer reliant on the nest). Buffers may be reduced at the discretion of the Qualified Avian Biologist based on Project activity, line of sight, tolerance of individuals, and stage of the nest. The nest area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. On-site construction monitoring shall be conducted when construction occurs in close proximately to an active nest buffer. The buffer shall remain in place until determined by the Qualified Avian Biologist that the nestlings have fledged, and the nest is no longer active. If an active nest is encountered during the Project construction, construction shall stop immediately until a Qualified Avian Biologist can determine (1) the status of the nest, and (2) when work can proceed without risking violation to state or federal laws.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 17 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
BIO-2: Buffers
If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/ Licensed Biologist and Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-3: Noise Mitigation Program
During all Project construction, the City of Holtville shall restrict use of equipment to hours least likely to disrupt wildlife (e.g., not at night or in early morning) and restrict use of generators except for temporary use in emergencies. Power to sites can be provided by solar PV (photovoltaic) systems, cogeneration systems (natural gas generator), small micro-hydroelectric systems, or small wind turbine systems. The City of Holtville shall ensure the use of noise suppression devices such as mufflers or enclosures for generators. Sounds generated from any means must be below the 55-60 dB range within 50-feet from the source.
Timing/Implementation: During Construction/Contractor
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-4: Burrowing Owl
Western Burrowing Owl. If complete avoidance cannot be achieved an CESA Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for western burrowing owl shall be obtained prior to initiation of ground disturbing activities. The Project proponent shall adhere to measures and conditions set forth within the ITP. Compensatory mitigation for direct impacts to the species shall be fulfilled at a minimum 1:1 ratio through purchase of available western burrowing owl conservation bank credits suitable for CESA mitigation (if available), perpetual conservation and management of suitable and occupied western burrowing owl habitat of equal or better quality, or another method as reviewed and approved by CDFW. Burrowing Owl Avoidance. If burrowing owls are detected on-site, a Qualified Biologist, knowledgeable of burrowing owl habitat and behavior, shall establish a nodisturbance buffer following the guidelines within the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (or most recent version) around all burrowing owl burrows such as roosting and satellite burrows within the Project area and an appropriate buffer determined by the Qualified Biologist, with posted signs demarking the area to avoid, using stakes, flags, and/or rope or cord to minimize the disturbance of burrowing owl habitat. The Qualified Biologist shall delineate burrows with different materials than those used to delineate the Project area, and the materials shall not attract raptor perching. Project proponent shall remove and properly dispose of all materials used for delineation immediately upon completion of the Project.
To ensure that the Project avoids impacts to burrowing owl, a Qualified Biologist shall complete a take avoidance survey no less than 14 days prior to initiating ground disturbance activities using the recommended methods described in the 2012 Staff Report. Burrowing owls may re-colonize a site after only a few days. Time lapses or a break in construction activities of 3 days will trigger subsequent take avoidance surveys including but not limited to a final survey conducted within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville, Qualified Biologist, CDFW, and Contractor
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 18 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
BIO-5: LSA Agreement
If project activities occur in the Alamo River, CDFW will be notified for a Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSA) pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1602.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville and CDFW Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-6: Biological Survey
Prior to Project construction activities, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within off-site areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern (SSC) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code §§ 3511, 4700, 5050, 5515), shall be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition of endangered, rare, or threatened (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species.
Species-specific surveys following protocols and guidelines, shall be completed by a Qualified Biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species-specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures shall be developed for present species in consultation with CDFW, which may include obtaining a CESA incidental take permit (ITP).
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-7: Swallow Nesting
Construction shall either occur outside of the swallow nesting period (generally March 15 through August 31), or the City of Holtville shall submit to CDFW, for review and approval, a Nesting Bird Avoidance Plan, prepared by a Qualified Avian Biologist which could include methods to deter swallow nesting.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/City of Holtville and CDFW Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-8: Bat Species
Prior to the start of Project activities, the City of Holtville shall retain a Qualified Bat Biologist to conduct a bat roosting habitat suitability assessment of the structures, trees, and vegetation that may be removed, altered, or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project. Within suitable bat roosting habitat, the Qualified Bat Biologist shall conduct surveys to determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by the Qualified Bat Biologist. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only.
Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre-dawn re-entry surveys, and to determine if night roosting is occurring in the area. The following actions will also be conducted as needed:
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 19 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
• If bats are found using any trees or structures within the Project area, including the bridge and any cliff swallow nests on the bridge, the Qualified Bat Biologist shall identify the bats to the species level and evaluate the colony, if applicable, to determine its size and significance. The bat survey results shall include: 1) the exact location of all roosting sites (location shall be described and mapped); 2) the number of bats present at the time of visit (count or estimate); 3) each species of bat present (including how the species was identified); 4) the location of all signs of bats (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks, and bats squeaking and chattering)(described and mapped); 5) the type of roost: maternity roost, winter roost (hibernacula), and night roost (resting at night while out feeding) versus a day roost (resting all day) must also be clearly stated; and 6) proposed avoidance and minimization measures, including avoidance of bats in swallow nests.
The results of the survey shall be submitted to CDFW for review prior to initiating Project activities.
• If active maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area, Project construction within these areas shall only occur generally between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost. Appropriate time to start Project construction to avoid impact shall be confirmed by a Qualified Bat Biologist. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. • If active hibernacula (winter roosts) are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area, a minimum 500-foot no-work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced. Project-related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until the end of Project construction and activities or until a Qualified Bat Biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active. Project-related construction and activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of a hibernacula is not feasible, the Qualified Bat Biologist will prepare a relocation plan to remove the hibernacula and provide for construction of an alternative bat roost outside of the work area. A bat roost relocation plan prepared by the Qualified Bat Biologist shall be submitted for CDFW review and approval prior to relocation and construction activities. The Qualified Bat Biologist will implement the relocation plan and new roost sites shall be in place before the commencemnet of any ground-disturbing activities that will occur within 500 feet of the hibernacula. New roost sites shall also be in place with sufficient timing prior to the initiation of Project-related activities to allow bat relocation, with the timing specified by the Qualified Bat Biologist with consideration of the species.
Removal of rosts shall be guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent techniques developed by the Qualified Bat Biologist. The City shall compensate no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting habitat with replacement and permanent protection of roost habitat.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-9: Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey
Prior to the start of Project activities, a biologist who has a valid 10(a)(1)(A) Fish and Wildlife Service recovery permit and a CDFW CESA Memorandum of Understanding for Yuma Ridgway’s rail shall perform presence/absence surveys according to the Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey Protocol for Project Evaluation within a 500-foot buffer of the Project. The survey requires 6 callback surveys between March 1 and May 15. If presence of Yuma Ridgway’s rail is detected, Project activities that require the use of heavy equipment shall not take place during the species peak Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 20 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
breeding season (generally February 15 to September 30). CDFW shall be notified in writing of the detection of this species within three (3) days. If protocol surveys indicate this species is not present within the 500-foot buffer, Project activities may proceed subject to the other provisions of federal and state law. The results of the protocol surveys shall be provided to CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-10: Burrowing Owl Breeding and Non-breeding Surveys The City of Holtville shall perform breeding and non-breeding surveys per the guidance of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012), assess the impact, and create mitigation measures to include avoidance, minimization, and mitigation for any burrowing owls identified on-site, and these same measures be applied to any individuals found during any take avoidance surveys. The guidance of mitigating impacts to burrowing owls in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012) shall be followed, including (a) permanent impacts to nesting, occupied and satellite burrows and/or burrowing owl habitat such that the habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owls impacted are replaced with permanent conservation of similar vegetation communities (grassland, scrublands, desert, urban, and agriculture) to provide for burrowing owl nesting, foraging, wintering, and dispersal (i.e., during breeding and nonbreeding seasons) comparable to or better than that of the impact area, and (b) sufficiently large acreage, and presence of fossorial mammals.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-11: Arrow-weed Thickets
To the greatest extent practicable, all project plans shall avoid impacts to arrow-weed thickets. If arrow-weed thickets cannot be avoided, the City of Holtville shall restore the habitat to preproject conditions, or compensatory mitigation for direct and permanent impacts consisting of habitat acquisition at a minimum of a 2:1 ratio. Habitat acquisition sites shall be biologically equal or superior to existing conditions and shall be conserved and managed in perpetuity.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-12: Nighttime Lighting
During Project construction and operations over the lifetime of the Project, the City of Holtville shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City of Holtville shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and away from surrounding open-space areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association standards at https://darksky.org/). The City of Holtville shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 21 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
BIO-13: Education Program
A Qualified Biologist shall conduct an education program for all persons employed or otherwise working on the Project site prior to performing any work on-site (Workers Environmental Awareness Program; WEAP). The WEAP shall consist of a presentation that includes a discussion of the biology of the habitats and species that may be present at the site. The WEAP shall also include information on the distribution and habitat needs of any special-status species that may be present, legal protections for those species, penalties for violations, and mitigation measures.
The WEAP shall include, but not be limited to: (1) best practices for managing waste and reducing activities that can lead to increased occurrences of opportunistic species and the impacts these species can have on wildlife in the area and (2) protected species that have the potential to occur on the Project site. Interpretation shall be provided for any non-English speaking workers, and the same instruction shall be provided for any individual prior to their performing any work onsite.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Measures are Incorporation - Sensitive habitats are those that are designated either rare within the region by governmental agencies or known to support sensitive animal or plant species and/or they serve as "corridors" for wildlife within the region. The vegetation community along the Alamo Riverbanks mainly consists of weedy plants such as salt cedar, fragmites and arrowweed. The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail.
While the project is not proposing to remove any existing vegetation, the City will strive to avoid and minimize impacts to the vegetation to the greatest extent possible. Furthermore, the City of Holtville will still implement the following mitigation measures as recommended by CDFW.
Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey Implement Mitigation measure BIO-2: Buffers
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-3: Noise Mitigation Program Implement Mitigation measure BIO-4: Burrowing Owl
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-5: Streambed Alteration Agreement Implement Mitigation measure BIO-6: Biological Survey
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-7: Swallow Nesting
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-8: Bat Species
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-9: Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey Implement Mitigation measure BIO-10: Burrowing Owl Breeding and Non-breeding Surveys
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-11: Arrow-weed Thickets Implement Mitigation measure BIO-12: Nighttime Lighting Implement Mitigation measure BIO-13: Education Program
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 22 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? - No Impact - The proposed project site does not contain areas targeted for preservation and enhancement as wetlands. The nearest wetland planning area is located 1.3 miles north of the project site but will have no direct effect on the site. Therefore, the proposed project will not have any adverse impacts on federally protected wetland stream channels.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? - Less Than Significant Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. While the project is expected to open access to the bridge and increase the human use of the trail, the affected areas are already disturbed and will not negatively encroach, nor impact areas used by wildlife. Therefore, the proposed project is expected to have a less than significant impact on the movement of wildlife species in the area. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? - No Impact - There are no local ordinances or policies in effect protecting biological resources within or near the project site; therefore, there will be no impact.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? - No Impact - The proposed project site is not located within or in the vicinity of any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan; therefore, there will be no impact.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined
in Section 15064.5?
X
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
X
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of designated cemeteries? X
Background:
In Imperial County, approximately 7,000 prehistoric archaeological sites have been recorded (Imperial County General Plan, 1998). A wide variety of site types are represented including settlements, trails, rock art, geoglyphs, fish traps, and resource procurement and manufacturing locations. The distribution Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 23 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
and availability that currently exists is a direct consequence of several environmental and historic factors which include the periodic flooding of ancient Lake Cahuilla and the existence of the New River and Alamo River. These factors encouraged prehistoric settlement and resource use in the vicinity of their shorelines and riverbanks.
Within the City of Holtville there are various historic structures including City Hall, Holt Park, and the water tower (Holtville, 2003). Although the City of Holtville has many properties with historic value, none have been recognized as a California Historical Landmark within City Limits. The nearest historical landmark is the Tecolote Rancho Site, located approximately 1.5 miles from the proposed project site on East Country Highway 8 and Barbara Worth Road. Out of an abundance of caution, a cultural resources survey was completed in July of 2016 which resulted in the identification of two previously recorded historical resources located outside of the project but within half a mile of the project site: 1) Holt Park (City Hall Buildings) and the Ash Main Canal (See Appendix B-Cultural Resources Report).
Furthermore, on January 31, 2022, a Historic Resources Mitigation Measures report was conducted to clarify mitigation measures for the proposed improvements to ensure any restoration of the bridge is done with the intent to preserve its historical structure and characteristics (See Appendix C – Historic Resources Mitigation Measures for the Holton Interurban Railway Alamo River Trestle Bridge).
Cultural Resources Impact Discussion:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated - Approximately 200 historic sites have been recorded in Imperial County. A record search through the Southeast Information Center (SIC) located at the Imperial Desert Museum did not identify any known historical resources eligible for the California or National Register near the proposed project site.
As part of its conditional approval for the proposed project, the City of Holtville required that mitigation measures be prepared prior to initiating the repair of the trestle bridge to ensure the repairs respect the historic structure’s construction and changes over time. In response to the Cultural Resources Survey, A Historic Resources Mitigation Measures study was prepared for the proposed project. The study recommended several mitigation measures to be implemented for the rehabilitation and repair of the bridge to ensure that the historic design and construction of the bridge are part of the improvement project. With the implementation of these recommended measures, the impact to the historical resource will be mitigated.
Mitigation Measures:
CR-1: Inventory of Existing Conditions
Prior to the repair or rehabilitation of the bridge, it is recommended that an inventory be conducted to determine the age of the current existing materials. Specifically, the different elements of the bridge should be inspected to determine if they are original to the bridge or if they were modified/added at a later date. If individual members were replaced in-kind as part of the maintenance of the bridge over time, these do not need to be removed. Only materials that altered the original design or appearance of the bridge should be removed; however, replacement members should be noted in the inventory for documentation purposes.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
CR-2: Historic American Engineering Record
Prior to the repair or rehabilitation of the bridge, it is recommended that the current condition of the bridge be documented through HAER-like documentation. The inventory of existing conditions conducted prior to this task should be used to help describe any modifications that have been made to the bridge and identify the remaining original portions. The HAER-like report should include a written presentation describing the physical entity and any appropriate engineering or architectural elements deemed important to the historical record. The report Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 24 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
should provide a history of the bridge and its association with the development of the cities of El Centro and Holtville. The HAER-like process includes gathering historic photographs and any available engineering drawings, plans, and elevations. The formal recordation of the current configuration of the bridge includes digital photographs keyed to an engineering map of the bridge and a site plan to show the location of each photograph. All information and photographs generated by the HAER-like program should be incorporated into a report and attachments prepared for submittal to the City of Holtville and any designated curation centers.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
CR-3: Removal of Non-Historic Materials
All materials added to the bridge after its 1904 completion that altered its original appearance should be removed if feasible. This includes the steel truss that was added in place of the original trestle and the metal deck plates added to either side of the railroad tracks. Any additional modern materials identified during the inventory of the bridge, or due to their absence in historic photographs or drawings, should also be removed.
Timing/Implementation: During Construction/Contractor
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
CR-4: Inspection of Existing Materials for Decay and Treatment The historic materials remaining after modern elements have been removed should be inspected for decay.
Timing/Implementation: After Construction/Contractor
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
CR-5: Repair and Replacement of Decayed or Damaged Materials All original bridge members or materials that are rejected due to decay or damage should be repaired or replaced in-kind with historically accurate materials to retain the bridge’s original historic character. Historic photographs and drawings found during historical research should be used as guidance for the repair and in-kind replacement of decayed or damaged materials. Any materials to be added to the historic bridge to facilitate the pedestrian use of the river crossing as part of the trail project shall match, to the extent possible, the appearance of the original materials. The existing track should remain but could be bordered by wood planks of sufficient height to allow a level pedestrian passage across the bridge. Finally, a plaque or historical marker should be placed at the entrance to the bridge that provides a description of the bridge’s history, providing any historic images that reflect the history of the rail line in the growth of the area.
Timing/Implementation: During Construction/Contractor
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? - Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation is Incorporated - A sensitivity site map was prepared by Mr. Jay Von Werlhof of Imperial Valley College illustrating general areas that are very sensitive or moderately sensitive to contain prehistoric resources as well as those areas not expected to contain any prehistoric resources.
The survey identified the areas along the Alamo River as very sensitive since it was extensively utilized by the Kamia as late as the mid 1800's. Although a search of existing records on the project site identified no known significant archeological resources for the project, the City of Holtville will still take precautionary measures so that any potential impacts to archeological resources are mitigated to less than significant. Mitigation measures have been incorporated to ensure any impacts are less than significant.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 25 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Mitigation Measures:
CR-6: Project Design
Design and construction of the Pete Mellinger Alamo River Trail and modifications to the historical railroad bridge must be precisely delineated to avoid any identified historic sites.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
CR-7: Cultural Materials
The design/construction plans shall further incorporate language that stipulates that if buried cultural materials are encountered during construction, work in that area must halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finding.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
CR-8: Evaluation Program
If design of the trail is unable to avoid the historic sites beyond 50 feet of their original delineation, a cultural/historic evaluation program to assess potential impacts associated with the proposed project shall be prepared prior to any construction activities and an amendment to this MND shall be prepared and recirculated if further mitigation measures are warranted.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
CR-9: Archeologist
An archaeologist shall be present should excavation be proposed at depths greater than five feet.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of designated cemeteries? - Less Than Significant Impact - Based on a search of the existing records, a formal cemetery exists approximately three quarters of a mile west of the project location. While the formal cemetery is located a sufficient distance from the project site so as not to be affected, the following mitigation measure will be implemented to further ensure that any potential impact is reduced to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure:
CR-10: Discovery of Human Remains
If evidence of human remains is discovered, construction activities within 200 feet of the discovery shall be halted or diverted and the Imperial County Coroner shall be notified (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). If the Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the Coroner will notify the NAHC which will designate a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The designated MLD will be given 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains (AB 2641). If the landowner does not agree with recommendations of MLD, the NAHC can mediate (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center, using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641).
Timing/Implementation: During construction
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 26 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Enforcement/Monitoring: NAHC, Imperial County Coroner, and Imperial County Department of Planning and Development Services.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 27 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
VI. ENERGY. Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
X
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
X
Background:
Construction of the project site will be subject to the requirements of the Imperial County Air Pollution Control Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Combustion Equipment. To provide a greater degree of reduction of PM10 emissions from construction combustion equipment per Air Pollution Control Districts recommendations, the project shall curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations; this may include ceasing of construction activity during the peak hour of vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways.
Energy Impact Discussion:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. - Less than Significant Impact - The project construction schedule is expected to last two (2) months. The proposed project would require site preparation, grading, structural repairs, landscaping, and paving. The construction phase would require energy for the manufacture and transportation of building materials, preparation of the site (e.g., site clearing, and grading), and repair of the trestle bridge. Petroleum-based fuels such as diesel fuel and gasoline would be the primary sources of energy for these tasks. The overall construction schedule and process are already designed to be efficient to avoid excess monetary costs. For example, equipment and fuel are not typically used wastefully due to the added expense associated with renting the equipment, maintaining it, and fueling it. Therefore, it is anticipated that the construction phase of the proposed project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy. Furthermore, all project related repairs and improvements are subject to Federal, State, and local energy efficiency requirements. Therefore, constructionrelated energy impacts would be less than significant.
Upon completion, the proposed project will have repaired the existing trestle bridge, installed a multi-modal walkway on the top deck, and extended and improved the existing Alamo River Trail to connect to the trestle bridge walkway. The operation of the project is not expected to be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessarily consume energy resources since the trail will only be for nonmotorized forms of transportation. Furthermore, the landscaping will be irrigated using an existing irrigation line located parallel to the trail. Energy usage for the irrigation line will be the same or close to the same used for the existing line prior to the project. All lighting fixtures along the improved portion of the trail will be solar powered and will not require the construction or extension of any electrical facilities. The number of visitors traveling to the trail is expected to be the same if not close to the number currently utilizing the Alamo River Trail. Therefore, operation-related energy impacts would be less than significant.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 28 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy efficiency. - No Impact - The proposed project furthers goal 6 of the Conservation/Open Space Element of the City of Holtville General Plan which implements policies aimed at promoting energy conservation and efficiency. The long-term goal of the project is to establish a nonmotorized network connecting public, residential, and commercial areas of the City of Holtville.
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
1) Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial evidence
of a known fault? Refer to Division
of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
X
2) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
3) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction? X
4) Landslides? X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil? X
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
X
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial direct
or indirect risks to life or property?
X
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 29 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Background:
The project site is located in the Imperial Valley portion of the Salton Trough, a topographic and geologic depression resulting from large scale regional faulting. Tectonic activity that formed the Trough continues at a high rate and moderate to strong ground motion from faults in the region, including the Rico Fault which is the closest fault (approximately one mile away), Brawley, Superstition Hills, and Imperial Faults may occur. However, the site does not lie within an identified Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, surface fault rupture, seismically induced flooding and landslides are considered unlikely at the site.
Much of the near surface soils in the Imperial Valley consist of silty clays and clays which are moderately to highly expansive. If necessary, a Geotechnical Study will be required to assess soil conditions prior to beginning construction. All recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical Study will reduce any potential impacts to geology and soils from project construction and operation to below a level of significance and shall be strictly adhered to. Construction is estimated to take approximately two (2) months to complete.
Geology and Soils Impact Discussion:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? - No Impact - The project site is not located in an identified fault rupture hazard zone. Surface rupture is considered unlikely at the project site and near the project area because of the well-delineated fault lines through the Imperial Valley as depicted on maps by the United States Geological Survey and the California Geological Survey. The closest major active faults are the Rico Fault and Superstition Mountain fault. No active faults or ground ruptures have been mapped underlying the site; therefore, there will be no impact. 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? - Less Than Significant Impact - The City of Holtville, as well as the entire Imperial Valley, is considered to be a seismically active area.
The project site may be susceptible to potentially strong seismic ground shaking because of the proximity to the Rico Fault (approximately one mile away), Brawley Fault Zone and Imperial Fault Zone. The existing trestle bridge was designed to withstand heavy loads from railway use and seismic activity. Rather than increase the loads on the bridge, the improvements will reduce the loads on the bridge and retain its ability to withstand seismic loads. If necessary, a Geotechnical Report will be prepared and the recommendations from the study will be followed to avoid potentially significant impacts from seismic activity. 3) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? - Less Than Significant Impact - Prior geotechnical reports in the region have found the area to be potentially susceptible to liquefaction. The subject site is located about 4.5 miles east of the Imperial Fault, 5.5 miles southeast of the Brawley Fault, and about 1.0 mile east of the Rico Fault.
Strong ground shaking can be expected for magnitudes of 6.0 and 7.2 events on these faults. If a Geotechnical Report is deemed necessary, the recommendations from the study will be followed to avoid potentially significant impacts from seismic activity. 4) Landslides - Less Than Significant Impact - There are significant topographic variations along the Alamo River, however, no historic landslides are shown on geologic maps of the region as reviewed through the California Geologic Survey of Landslide Inventory Maps. In addition, no habitable structures are being proposed with this project, therefore, any potential impact would be less than significant.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 30 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Mitigation Measures
GEO-1: Geotechnical Report
A site-specific geotechnical investigation shall be prepared on an as needed basis for the project and said geotechnical report shall be implemented and shown on applicable grading and building plans as details, notes or as otherwise appropriate.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
GEO-2: State Building Code
The proposed project is located near active faults; therefore, the proposed bridge repairs and improvements shall be made in accordance with the California State Building Code (Title 24 of the California Administrative Code), which contains specifications to minimize adverse effects due to ground shaking from earthquakes and liquefaction.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
GEO-3: State Water Resources Control Board Permit
The Contractor shall comply with the regulatory requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) Order No. 2009-0009 DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. CAS000002 for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity, copies of which are available on SWRCB website at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwtr/construction.html.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
GEO-4: Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
The City, or its authorized representative, shall require the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan by a qualified preparer and shall coordinate the Notice of Intent and appropriate annual fees to the State Water Resources Control Board.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
GEO-5: Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Practitioner The Contractor shall be responsible for implementation of the SWPPP and shall have a qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) available on site and be responsible for implementation of all Best Management Practices.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? - Less Than Significant Impact - The project area along the Alamo River Corridor contains diverse topographic features with steep slopes. The proposed project will not alter existing drainage patterns or any significant drainage features. To mitigate any potation impacts a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan will be required to be prepared and implemented by the construction contractor which shall follow Best Management Practices to ensure sediment does not erode from the proposed project site.
Permanent Best Management Practices for erosion control will also be implemented to mitigate any potential impacts at disturbed areas to a less than significant level.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 31 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? - Less Than Significant Impact - It is unknown whether the proposed project site is located within a known unstable geologic unit as a geotechnical report has not yet been prepared. The project site and vicinity contain diverse topographic features and landslides are possible although none are anticipated to occur as there are no records of historic landslides on geologic maps reviewed by the California Geologic Survey of Landslide Inventory Maps for the proposed project area. Therefore, if necessary, a geotechnical report will be prepared prior to the construction of any structures. The impact, however, would be less than significant.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (UBC 1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? - Less Than Significant Impact - A geotechnical report has not yet been completed for this project.
The region has been found to contain underlain clays of moderate expansion potential. However, the proposed project does not propose constructing structures that would be affected by expansive soils. Therefore, these soils will not create substantial risks to life or property and any impacts would be less than significant.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? - No Impact - The project area is located within the current city limits where septic tanks and alternative wastewater collection systems are not permitted. Therefore, there will be no impact.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? - No Impact – The two cultural surveys conducted in 2016 and 2017 stated that there may be some locations with paleontological resources ad geological features in the Imperial Valley, none of those locations are located on or in the proximity of the project site.
Therefore, there will be no impact.
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
X
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
X
Background:
The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. Although the project itself will not generate greenhouse gas emissions, it is expected that the machinery as well as the vehicles used for construction and to transport workers will release greenhouse gases. However, construction will only be temporary, and any impacts will be shortterm. Construction is estimated to take approximately two (2) months to complete. Therefore, the potential for greenhouse gases will be less than significant.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Discussion:
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 32 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? - Less Than Significant Impact - The proposed project will generate greenhouse gas emissions as a result of construction materials during a short-term construction period. Construction is estimated to take approximately two (2) months to complete and is not expected to have a significant impact following its completion. Therefore, the proposed project will result in a less than significant impact. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? - No Impact - The project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emission of greenhouse gases. The project will comply with the rules and regulations of the County of Imperial Air Pollution Control District and implement any required plans as necessary.
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
X
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
X
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
X
d) Be located on a site, which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
X
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard or excessive noise for people
residing or working in the project area?
X
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
X
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires. X
Background:
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 33 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
The proposed project is within an open space zone which is intended to provide open spaces for the preservation of natural resources, managed production of resources, outdoor recreation, the protection of public health and safety, and the preservation of natural scenic areas for the existing and future population. While limited agricultural uses are permitted within open space zones, the project sites proximity to the Alamo River and sloped topography makes it unsuitable for agricultural use. Thus, hazardous materials within the project’s immediate vicinity will not be utilized by the project or the surrounding properties. Furthermore, Envirostor, an online data management system run by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control, identified no contaminated sites within or near the project area.
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? - No Impact - This proposed project does not include any commercial or industrial development nor the use of hazardous substances during operation. Therefore, the project will have no impact. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? - No Impact - The proposed project will not contain, handle, or store any potential sources of chemicals or compounds that would present a significant risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? - No Impact - The school nearest to the proposed project site is located a little over a quarter mile (0.33 miles) north of the site. The project will not handle, store, or transport hazardous material. Therefore, it will not have any effect on an existing or proposed school. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? - No Impact - Neither the proposed project site nor any adjacent properties are listed as a hazardous material site.
Furthermore, the proposed project site does not have a history of prior uses other than a railway bridge and walking trail. Therefore, the project will have no impact. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? - No Impact - The proposed project area is not located within two miles of any public use airport.
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? - No Impact - The proposed project is not part of any adopted emergency evacuation plan, nor will it impair or physically interfere with an existing emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, the project will have no impact.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. - No Impact - While the Alamo River has brushes and other vegetation along the river bottom, the proposed project will not traverse through said vegetation. Furthermore, the existing Alamo River Trail portions to be improved have already been grubbed and cleared of dry brush during the trails initial construction and ongoing maintenance in the past decade. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 34 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground
water quality?
X
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
X
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would: i) result
in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off
site;
i. result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site;
ii. substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
X
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
X
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
X
Background:
There are no expected impacts to hydrology and water quality, the proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail.
The project does not involve the construction of any new buildings or structures outside of the trestle bridge walkways and trail. While the project will require irrigation for the proposed landscaping, an Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 35 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
existing irrigation system will be utilized for the project. Additionally, the project will not necessitate services from any sewer system, nor does it propose alterations to current water ways.
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? - No Impact - The project does not propose waste discharges that require waste discharge permits or NPDES permits from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition, the project does not propose any known sources of polluted run-off or land use activities that would require special site design considerations, source control Best Management Practices, or treatment control BMP’s. Best Management Practices will be implemented during construction activities, therefore there will be no violation of water quality standards or discharge requirements. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? - No Impact - Based on the regional topography, groundwater flow is assumed to be generally towards the incised Alamo River channel. The proposed project does not involve operations that would interfere with groundwater recharge including, but not limited to the following: the proposed project does not involve regional diversion of water to another groundwater basin; or diversion or channelization of the Alamo River with impervious layers, such as concrete lining or culverts. In addition, the project does not propose to use groundwater for any purpose, including irrigation. Therefore, no impact on groundwater resources is anticipated.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: - Less Than Significant Impact - i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. No deep excavation is expected to take place at the project site except at the bridge buttresses and all the drainage will be conveyed through natural drainage channels and approved drainage facilities. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact.
ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; The project will not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a matter that would result in flooding. Drainage will continue to be conveyed to either natural drainage channels or approved drainage facilities thus the project will have a less than significant impact.
iii. create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or The project will not contribute nor create runoff water which would exceed the capacity of stormwater drainage systems. All drainage will continue to be conveyed to either natural drainage channels or through approved drainage facilities, thus the project will have a less than significant impact.
iv. impede or redirect flood flows? The project will not impede or redirect existing flood flows, nor does it propose any changes. drainage will continue to be conveyed to either natural drainage channels or approved drainage facilities thus the project will have a less than significant impact.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? - No Impact - The proposed project will not contribute nor create runoff water and drainage will continue to be conveyed to either natural drainage channels or approved Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 36 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
drainage facilities. Additionally, the project is not located within any tsunami or seiche zones.
Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact.
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? - No Impact - The proposed project is not part of nor will it interfere with any water quality control plan or groundwater management plan.
Therefore, the project will have no impact.
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Physically divide an established community? X
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due
to a conflict with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
X
Background:
The Open Space zone, where the proposed project is located, is intended to provide open spaces for the preservation of natural resources, managed production of resources, outdoor recreation, the protection of public health and safety, and the preservation of natural scenic areas for the existing and future population. The project proposes the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail which complies with the intent of the established zone.
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Physically divide an established community? - No Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge along with the installation of new decking to serve as a multimodal pathway for non-motorized users. The project does not propose new infrastructure such as major roadways, water supply systems, or utilities to the area that will physically divide an established community. Therefore, the proposed project will not disrupt or divide the established community. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? - No Impact - The proposed project is consistent with the City of Holtville General Plan and Land Use Plan which provide for recreation activities along the Alamo River corridor. The proposed project is located within an Open Space zone which is intended to provide open spaces for the preservation of natural resources, managed production of resources, outdoor recreation, the protection of public health and safety, and the preservation of natural scenic areas for the existing and future population. The project furthers the intent of the City of Holtville Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will comply with all local and state development standards. Therefore, the project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of any agency with jurisdiction.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 37 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
X
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
X
Background:
There are no known mineral resources delineated in a United States Geological Survey (USGS) database search of the project area, or in the Holtville or Imperial County General Plan.
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? - No Impact - Known mineral resources for the Imperial Valley are gold and gypsum as well as limestone, pumice, clay stone, sand, and gravel. Mining operations are in the Glamis Plateau area and the Cargo Muchacho Mountains located more than thirty (30) miles from the project site. According to the Imperial County General Plan’s survey of mineral and soil resources, there are no known mineral resources that would be of value to the region and state at the project site. Therefore, the project will have no impact.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other and use plan? - No Impact - There are no locally important mineral resource recovery sites delineated on any local plans in or near the vicinity of the proposed project site. Therefore, the project will have no impact.
XIII. NOISE – Would the project result in:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
X
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive ground borne vibration or ground
borne noise levels?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 38 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
X
Background:
Noise is expected to occur at the project site during construction, however there are no sensitive receptors that would be affected in close proximity, the closest single-family residence would be a quarter of a mile away. Construction is estimated to take approximately two (2) months to complete. Post construction, there is no anticipated noise that would be in excess of the established thresholds found the Holtville General Plan as motorized vehicles are not permitted on the Alamo River Trail.
XIII. NOISE IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? - No Impact - The proposed project will consist of a non-motorized multi-use trail leading up to the deck of the trestle bridge. The trail will not include any noise-generating equipment and surrounding land uses are not considered noise sensitive. Additionally, motorized vehicles are restricted on the Alamo River Trail which will connect to the trestle bridge and thus is not anticipated to generate noise that would be in excess of the established thresholds found in the Holtville General Plan.
Therefore, there will be no impact.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? - No Impact - The project does not propose any land uses that can expose people to or generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels onsite such as mass transit, major roadways, or intensive extractive industry. Therefore, the project will have no impact.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise? - No Impact - The proposed project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or land use plan nor is it within two miles of a public airport.
Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in existing ambient noise levels in the proposed project vicinity.
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 39 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
X
Background:
The proposed project does not incorporate any housing nor is it inducing growth. The project is proposed in an Open Space zone and is surrounded by nonresidential uses. Therefore, the proposed project would not induce population growth or displace people necessitating housing.
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other public infrastructure)? - No Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. The project does not propose the construction of any new housing developments, nor does it involve the construction or extension of any new utility services.
Furthermore, the proposed project is located within an open space zone which does not permit residential uses. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact. b) Displace substantial number of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? - No Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. The project does not propose the demolition or replacement of any new housing developments. Furthermore, the proposed project is located within an open space zone which does not permit residential uses. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact.
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any
of the public services:
1) Fire protection?
2) Police protection?
3) Schools?
4) Parks?
5) Other public facilities?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 40 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Background:
Impacts on public services are limited to annual maintenance activities to clear any overgrown brush or debris from the bridge and trail area to ensure public safety and fire prevention. No impact is expected since the project will not result in any physical alteration to current government facilities.
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
1) Fire protection? - No Impact - Although the trestle bridge walkway and Alamo River Trail will be accessible to the public, the people utilizing the trail are expected to be the same ones currently utilizing the existing portions of the trail. Thus, the demand for fire prevention services is expected to be the same and there will be no need for new fire facilities.
Therefore, the project will have no impact.
2) Police protection? - No Impact - The proposed opening of the trestle bridge for pedestrian use and extending of the Alamo River Trail to connect to said bridge is not expected to increase the demand for law enforcement facilities. Therefore, there will be no impact.
3) Schools? - No Impact - The proposed project will have no impact on population growth and does not involve the development of new housing. No increase in the demand of school facilities or services is anticipated. Therefore, there will be no impact. 4) Parks? - No Impact - While the new portions of the trail developed by the proposed project will require maintenance, the maintenance will be minor and can be added to the existing maintenance schedule for the Alamo River Trail. Therefore, the project will have no impact.
5) Other Public Facilities? - No Impact - Development of the proposed project does not have the potential of significantly increasing demand for any other public facilities including, but not limited to, public libraries, medical facilities, or public works services as no such services are expected to be extended. Therefore, there will be no impact on existing public facilities as a result of this project.
XVI. RECREATION – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of the
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
X
b) Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 41 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Background:
The proposed project plans to add to the current recreational facilities of the City of Holtville. As it is not population-inducing, there would be a positive impact on recreation and will alleviate some of the demand for existing facilities. As the proposed project will be part of the Alamo River Trail project, it will connect to the existing Phase I and future Phase II of the trail project totaling an estimated trail length of
3.0 miles. All trail and bridge repairs and improvements will be planned in compliance with all State and Local development standards.
XVI. RECREATION IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? - No Impact - The proposed project will not increase population nor have a negative impact on the current service demand levels of existing recreational facilities and parks. The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail which may alternately alleviate some of the existing demands to local parks and recreational facilities.
Therefore, there will be no significant adverse impact to the environment. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? - Less Than Significant Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. The proposed project does not propose any recreational facilities other than the improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. Therefore, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact.
XVII. TRANSPORTATION – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
X
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X
c) Substantially increase hazardous due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
X
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? X
Background:
The proposed project is anticipated to generate up to thirty (30) users a day, the majority of which will be local; thus it is conservatively estimated that a maximum parking demand of thirty per day would be created and generate a maximum of sixty (60) vehicle trips daily during peak season and peak hours of Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 42 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
operation. As parking facilities were established, approximately 500 feet from the trestle bridge, during Phase I of the Alamo River Trail, it is anticipated that users will use those facilities when utilizing the trail.
Thus, the proposed project will not result in a significant traffic impact as there are sufficient parking spaces. The pedestrian walkway will be designed for non-motorized users such as pedestrians and cyclists, comply with State Standards, and have no adverse impacts to local policies and regulations.
XVII. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND DISCUSSION:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? - No Impact - The proposed project will not conflict with any circulation program, plan, ordinance, or policy. Rather than conflict, the project furthers program number 6 of the Circulation Element of the 2017 General Plan which consists of developing a pedestrian and bicycle network with the goal of connecting public, residential, and business areas within the City of Holtville. Furthermore, the proposed project will not cause the traffic impact threshold guidelines established by the State or City of Holtville to be exceeded. Therefore, the project will have no impact. While the project is expected to have no impact, the following mitigation measures are being implemented to account for any vehicle or combination of vehicles of a size or weight exceeding the maximum limitations from the California Vehicle Code operating or moving through State Route 115 during the project’s construction phase.
Mitigation Measures:
TRANSP-1: Department of Transportation Hauling/Traffic Permit Prior to the start of any construction activities, the City shall acquire a permit from the Department of Transportation to operate or move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special mobile equipment, of a size or weight of vehicle or load exceeding the maximum limitations specified in the California Vehicle Code, on State Route 115 or any other facility under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
TRANSP-2: Department of Transportation Encroachment Permit Should any work within the Department of Transportation Right-of-Way be required for the project, the City shall acquire an encroachment permit from the Department of Transportation prior to the start of construction activities within their Right-of-Way.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
TRANSP-3: Perpetuation of Monuments
Per Business and Profession Code 8771, perpetuation of survey monuments shall be carried out by a licensed land surveyor should any existing monuments be destroyed by construction activities related to the project.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? - Less Than Significant Impact - Although the portion of the public to be utilizing the portions of the project are expected to be the same users in the Alamo River Trail, a conservative assumption that fifteen (15) to thirty (30) vehicles per day will drive to utilize the trail. It is anticipated that most users will be local walking or riding from dwelling units. The project is a part of the existing Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 43 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Alamo River Trail which has a vehicle staging area 500 feet from the trestle bridge at Earl Walker Park accessed via State Highway 115. While the project will open the bridge for pedestrian use, the City expects the number of vehicles traveling to the project to be the same vehicles already utilizing Phase I of the Alamo River Trail where the vehicle staging area is located. Fifteen (15) parking spaces are provided at the nearby Phase I staging area at Earl Walker Park accessed by State Highway 115. Conservatively, it was assumed that the staging area would, at maximum, fill to capacity twice daily, thus servicing 15 to 30 vehicles per day. Two vehicle trips were assumed (one inbound trip and one outbound trip) for a maximum of 60 trips. For purposes of the traffic impact assessment, a conservative trip generation rate was assumed, it is anticipated that recreational trips will increase to these maximums seasonally during fall, winter and spring and primarily during weekends. The proposed project will not result in a significant traffic impact to the existing road network, capacity, and level of service. Thus, any traffic impact would be less than significant impact.
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? - No Impact - The proposed project does not consist of any sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or incompatible uses. The project will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and restrict the use of motorized vehicles. Therefore, the project will have no impact. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? - No Impact - The proposed project will use existing access points and comply with all federal, state, and local standards for emergency access.
Therefore, the project will have no impact.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 44 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Background:
Access to the California Historical Resources was made in November 2024 and did not list any historical resources. Additionally, two Cultural Resource Surveys, completed in 2017 and 2022, did not identify any historical resources eligible for the California or National Register at or near the proposed project site.
While no historical resources were identified, the City of Holtville will submit a copy of the draft initial study to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for review and distribution. Should any comments or requests for consultation be received, the City of Holtville will incorporate the comments as a mitigation measure and coordinate with any request for consultation.
XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts and Discussion:
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native
American tribe.
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 45 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or - No Impact - Access to the California Historical Resources was made in November 2024 and did not list any historical resources.
Additionally, two Cultural Resource Surveys, completed in 2017 and 2022, did not identify any historical resources eligible for the California or National Register at or near the proposed project site.
ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision I of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision I of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. - No Impact - As previously mentioned, neither the California Historical Resources database nor the two Cultural Resource Surveys identified any cultural or historic resources at or near the project site.
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction
or relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
X
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
X
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
X
e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes
and regulations related to solid waste? X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 46 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Background:
The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. While the proposed landscaping will require irrigation, an existing irrigation line running parallel to the project site will be utilized. No other utilities or service systems will be utilized.
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS IMPACT DISCUSSION:
a) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? - No Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. All landscaping will be irrigated via an existing irrigation line running parallel to the trail. As such no new water or wastewater facilities will be constructed or extended. The project does not propose any new construction or expansion of wastewater services. Thus, there will be no impact. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? - No Impact - The proposed project will utilize an existing irrigation line running parallel to the Alamo River Trail and will thus have sufficient water supply for irrigation purposes year-round. The project will not utilize any additional water supplies outside of irrigation purposes, nor will it require the construction or expansion of water services. Thus, there will be no impact. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? - No Impact - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. The project will not utilize any wastewater, nor does it propose the construction or expansion of wastewater services. Thus, there will be no impact.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? - No Impact - The proposed project will be connected to the existing Alamo River Trail which has both trash and recyclable receptacles located throughout the trail. Additional trash and recyclable receptacles will be installed along the improved portions of the trail. The Holtville Disposal Site accommodates solid waste disposal for the Holtville community and has sufficient capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? - No Impact - The collection and disposal of solid waste from the project site and staging areas will be conducted in compliance with the County wide Integrated Waste Management Plan.
Furthermore, the proposed project will comply with all Federal, State, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste and will therefore have no impact.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 47 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
X
d) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
X
Background:
According to the Imperial County General Plan Seismic and Public Safety Element (Imperial County 2016) the potential for a major fire in the unincorporated areas of the County of Imperial is generally low (page 16). The City of Holtville General Plan Safety Element also states that “wildfires do not pose much of a risk to Holtville” (City of Holtville 2017, page 111).
XX. WILDFIRE:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? - No Impact - The proposed project is located on the southwestern edge of the City of Holtville adjacent to unincorporated Imperial County. The proposed project is adjacent to Highway 115 and is not anticipated to interfere or disrupt Highway 115 during or after construction. Furthermore, the proposed project is not part of any adopted emergency evacuation plan thus it will not impair or physically interfere with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, the project will have no impact. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? - No Impact - The proposed project will not contain, handle, or store any potential sources of chemicals or compounds that would present a significant risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances. Therefore, the project will have no impact
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 48 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? - No Impact - As previously noted, the proposed project is located on the southwestern border of the City Limits. No wildlands are located near the project site.
Additionally, the proposed project does not include the installation or maintenance of roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities as the project is proposing to connect and maintain an existing PVC main line for the irrigation of the proposed landscaping.
Therefore, no impact would occur with regard to the installation or maintenance of infrastructure that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? - Less Than Significant Impact - The proposed project is located adjacent to and over the Alamo River. The project area leading up to the bridge and the Trestle Bridge have a sloped topography which may cause a significant risk for downslope flooding. To mitigate this issue, fiber rolls held in place by stakes will be placed along the face of the slope where it transitions into a steeper slope. The rolls will reduce the erosion potential of stormwater on long or steep slopes by helping to slow, filter and spread overland flows. Additionally, gravel shoulders will be installed parallel to the trail walkway to help redirect runoff from the trail and into native drainage patterns and approved drainage facilities. By implementing the fiber rolls and gravel shoulders, the project will have a less than significant impact.
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
X
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
X
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 49 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
Background:
The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. Construction is estimated to take approximately two (2) months to complete. This Initial Study provides the potential for degradation to the existing quality of the environment and the potential to cause substantial adverse impacts unless mitigation is incorporated. It allows for areas of concern to be mitigated in order for impacts to be less than what they could be should mitigation not be incorporated. The proposed project is not expected to impact the environment once mitigation is in place.
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
The following are Mandatory Findings of Significance in accordance with Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines?
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation is Incorporated - The proposed project could have the potential to significantly impact the environment because it has the potential to impact wildlife and cultural resources during construction, however, mitigation measures BIO 1-13 and CR 1-10 have been put in place that would reduce the impacts to less than significant.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) – Less Than Significant Impact - The proposed project will be part of the City of Holtville Alamo River Recreation Trail. While Phase I of the Alamo River Trail project has been completed and will connect to the proposed trestle bridge walkway, Phase II of the trail project is still in the planning phase and would extend the existing trail to the City of Holtville Wetlands located approximately three quarters of a mile north of the trestle bridge project. Phase II of the Alamo River Trail project will consist of “grubbing” (removing the brush and vegetation), excavation and the planting of reeds and other hydrophilic vegetation that are used to remove nutrients from the water. Thus, it has been determined that the project could have a cumulatively adverse effect, however the proposed mitigation measures will reduce potential negative effects. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation is Incorporated - The proposed project does have the potential to adversely affect humans via air quality during construction. Therefore, mitigation measures AQ 1 and AQ 2 will be implemented to reduce the impacts to be less than significant.
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 50 of 50 Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project April 2025
116.489
SOURCE REFERENCES
The following documents were used as sources of factual data and are hereby incorporated as part of this Environmental Checklist. Because of the voluminous nature of the documents, copies of the following are not distributed with these documents but may be obtained from the City of Holtville at 121 West Fifth Street in Holtville, California.
A City of Holtville Zoning Ordinance, 2011
B City of Holtville General Plan, and Land Use Plan Update 2017 C City of Holtville Service Area Plan, 2017
D Imperial County General Plan, 1993
E Imperial County Zoning Map 4, 2006
F California Native Plant Society Database
G United States Geological Survey Interactive Fault Map H Imperial County Air Pollution Control District CEQA Air Quality Handbook I United States Geological Survey Mineral Resources Database J California Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality Board, California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), PM 2.5/PM 10
K California Department of Toxic Substances Council Envirostor Database L United States Environmental Protection Green Book Non-Attainment Areas M FEMA 100 Year Flood Plain Map
N Barret’s Biological, Biological Resources Technical Report. June 2016 O Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey For The Holtville Wetlands Trail Link Project. July 19, 2016
P Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. Historic Resources Mitigation Measures for the Holton Interurban Railway Alamo River Trestle Bridge as Part of the Holtville Wetlands Trail Link Phase 2 Project, January 31, 2022
Q California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Programs, 1982 R Office of Historic Preservation California Historical Resources List, December 2024 1 | Page
APPENDIX A
Errata and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
2 | Page
CITY OF HOLTVILLE
Errata and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program
For the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration
Alamo River Trestle Bridge
SCH# 2024121192
Prepared By:
City of Holtville
Planning & Building Department
121 West 5th Street
Holtville, CA 92243
760-337-3883
April 2025
3 | Page
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Introduction/Overview.............................................................................................. 4
2.0 Comments and Response to Comments .................................................................... 5
2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 5
2.2 List of Commenters.................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Requirements for Responding to Comments......................................................... 5
2.4 Comments and Response to Comments ................................................................ 6
2.5 Letter 1 – City of Holtville Response to Comments ............................................... 9
2.6 Letter 2 – City of Holtville Response to Comments ..............................................14
2.7 Letter 3 – City of Holtville Response to Comments ..............................................42
3.0 Errata and Changes to the Draft IS/MND ...................................................................57
3.1 Revisions .................................................................................................................57
4.0 and Monitoring Reporting Program ...........................................................................71
4.1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements.............................................71
4.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Procedures.................................................72 4 | Page
1.0 Introduction
1.1Introduction/Overview
The Alamo River Trail Trestle Bridge was constructed around circa 1904 with a length of about 350 feet, is an open deck bridge consisting of several short spans and is supported by a system of splayed vertical structural elements. A particular feature of this trestle is the apparent composite of both a timber bent system at both ends and a steel space truss system in the middle. The steel truss occupies the mid one-third of the length of the trestle and is bolted with rivet type connections. The steel rails have long been removed by A & K Railroad Materials for salvage use. As such, the remaining transverse timber beams, spaced at about 2 to 3 feet on center, form the current main top surface of the deck.
These transverse beams are about 7-1/2 inch wide by 9-1/2 inch deep over the longitudinal wood girders and increase to 9-1/2 by 16 inches over the top chords of the steel truss. On each end of the transverse beams, a 3-foot-wide metal grating sidewalk supported by double cantilevered wood rafters provides access and adds to the total width of the trestle top deck. A set of 3'-6" tall vertical metal angles at about 3’ on center are bolted to the tips of the double cantilevers to form a handrail system with horizontal cables. In August of 2009 a fire occurred in the vicinity of the trestle bridge which resulted in significant damage. A 2010 visual review of the trestle bridge found that the deck, support cross beams, grating, railings, and bents were completely damaged and in need of full replacement.
The trestle bridge repair will result in the replacement of the damaged structural bent timbers, structural cross beams, and other structural components. More specifically, the rehabilitation will consist of the demolition and replacement of the damaged portions of the bridge (approximately 1,000 square feet), and the installation of 3,500 square feet of bridge decking suitable for non-motorized trail users, 350 linear feet of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant bridge railings suitable for pedestrians and bicycles, and 350 square feet of bridge landing suitable for the transition between the bridge and the existing Alamo River Trail. The damaged structures will be replaced with timber, when feasible, to match the nondamaged portion of the bridge and restore the aesthetic appeal of the bridge. Of the eighteen (18) bents that act as key support systems and hold up the bridge deck between spans, only one bent located on the river bank approximately twenty-six (26) feet west of the river bed will be replaced. No work will be conducted on the river bed. The improvements will result in the repair and conversion of the existing trestle bridge into a multimodal pathway suitable for non-motorized users including pedestrians, bicycles and equestrian traffic.
The project will also include improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail aimed at extending the trail to connect to the trestle bridge walkway. The trail improvements will consist of an 8-foot wide, 12 inch deep, class 2 base trail continuation section from the 5 | Page
east edge of the Alamo River Bridge to the existing 8-foot-wide plain cement concrete trail. Additional improvements include trail side amenities consisting of 45,000 square feet of mulch, fifteen (15) trees from fifteen (15) gallon containers, thirty-five (35) each of bushes, shrubs, and grasses, six (6) benches, two (2) informational kiosks, four (4) “No Motor Vehicles” signs, and one (1) funding acknowledgement sign. All proposed landscaping will comply with the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and have its own irrigation consisting of drip fittings and tree bubblers.
2.0 Comments and Response to Comments
2.1 Introduction
This chapter includes all comments received on the draft IS/MND during the 30-day public and agency review period. No new significant environmental impacts or issues, beyond those already identified in the draft IS/MND for the Alamo River Trestle Bridge were raised during the public review period. Acting as lead agency under CEQA, the City of Holtville directed responses to the comments received on the draft IS/MND.
2.2 List of Commenters
The following individuals and representatives of organizations and agencies submitted written comments on the draft IS/MND.
Table 1. List of Commenters on the Draft IS/MND
Comments Received by the City of Holtville
No. Individual or Signatory Affiliation Date
1 Kimberly D. Dodson, GISP,
Branch Chief
California Department of
Transportation January 23, 2025
2 Ismael Garcia, Environmental
Coordinator
Imperial County Air
Pollution Control District January 28, 2025
3 Brandy Wood, Environmental
Program Manager
California Department of
Fish and Wildlife January 31, 2025
2.3 Requirements for Responding to Comments
CEQA Guidelines Section 15088 requires that lead agencies evaluate all comments on environmental issues received on the IS/MND and prepare a written response. CEQA Guidelines Section 15088 also recommends that where the response to comments results in revisions to the IS/MND, those revisions should be noted as a revision to the IS/MND or in a separate section of this Errata and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Revisions are reflected in the Errata, Section 3.0 of this document. 6 | Page
2.4 Comments and Response to Comments
Written comments on the draft IS/MND are reproduced on the following pages, along with responses to those comments. To assist in referencing comments and responses, the letters are coded using numbers (e.g., Comment Letter 1) and each issue raised in the comment letter is assigned a number that correlates with the number (e.g. 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, etc.).
Where changes to the draft IS/MND text result from responding to comments, those changes are included in the response and demarcated with revision marks (underline for new text, strike-out for deleted text). Comment-initiated text revisions to the draft IS/MND and minor staff-initiated changes are compiled in their entirety and are demarcated with revision marks in Chapter 3.0, Errata, of this Revised IS/MND. 7 | Page
Letter 1 - California Department of Transportation, Kimberly D. Dodson, (Pg. 1 of 2)
8 | Page
Letter 1 - California Department of Transportation, Kimberly D. Dodson, (Pg. 2 of 2)
9 | Page
2.5 Letter 1 – City of Holtville Response to Comments
Response to Comment 1-1: The comment provides introductory remarks and a description of the Department of Transportation’s strategic goals. Since the comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment is necessary.
Response to Comment 1-2: The comment explains that the Department of Transportation has discretionary authority with respect to highways under its jurisdiction and may, upon application and if good cause appears, issue a special permit to operate or move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special mobile equipment of a size or weight of vehicle or load exceeding the maximum limitations specified in the California Vehicle Code. The comment further states that potential impacts to the highway facilities (Route 115) and traveling public from the detour, demolition and other construction activities should be discussed and addressed before work begins. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure TRANSP-1 was added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
TRANSP-1: Department of Transportation Hauling/Traffic Permit Prior to the start of any construction activities, the City shall acquire a permit from the Department of Transportation to operate or move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special mobile equipment, of a size or weight of vehicle or load exceeding the maximum limitations specified in the California Vehicle Code, on State Route 115 or any other facility under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation.
Response to Comment 1-3: The comment explains that any work performed within the Department of Transportation’s Right-of-Way will require discretionary review and approval by the Department of Transportation and an encroachment permit will be required for any work within their Right-of-Way prior to construction. The comment further states that perpetuation of survey monuments by a licensed land surveyor is required, if they are being destroyed by any construction. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measures TRANSP-2 and TRANSP3 were added to state the following:
TRANSP-2: Department of Transportation Encroachment Permit Should any work within the Department of Transportation Right-of-Way be required for the project, the City shall acquire an encroachment permit from the Department of Transportation prior to the start of construction activities within their Right-of-Way
10 | Page
TRANSP-3: Perpetuation of Monuments
Per Business and Profession Code 8771, perpetuation of survey monuments shall be carried out by a licensed land surveyor should any existing monuments be destroyed by construction activities related to the project.
Response to Comment 1-4: The comment provides the commenter’s phone number and email address for additional information regarding the comment letter. The comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
11 | Page
Letter 2 – Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Ismael Garcia, (Pg. 1 of 3) 12 | Page
Letter 2 – Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Ismael Garcia, (Pg. 2 of 3) 13 | Page
Letter 2 – Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Ismael Garcia, (Pg. 3 of 3) 14 | Page
2.6 Letter 2 – City of Holtville Response to Comments
Response to Comment 2-1: The comment provides introductory remarks and a description of the Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project. The comment further states that the Draft IS/MND implemented mitigation measures AQ-1 and AQ2. Since the comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment is necessary.
Response to Comment 2-2: The comment provides a detailed description of mitigation measure AQ-1: Dust Control Plan from the draft IS/MND. No additional information or comments are provided. Since the comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment is necessary.
Response to Comment 2-3: The comment provides a detailed description of mitigation measure AQ-2: Air Quality Measures from the draft IS/MND. No additional information or comments are provided. Since the comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment is necessary.
Response to Comment 2-4: The comment states that while the document does not provide any air quality modelling, mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 from the Draft IS/MND are consistent with mitigations that reduce the impacts from the type of project to below significant. The comments also provide a reminder that the project must comply with all Imperial County Air Pollution Control District rules and regulations. This comment has been noted, and minor edits to the description on the Air Quality section of the Revised IS/MND were added to stipulate compliance with all Imperial County Air Pollution Control District rules and regulations.
Response to Comment 2-5: The comment provides the commenter’s phone number, email address, and a web link for additional information regarding the comment letter. The comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
15 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 1 of 27) 16 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 2 of 27) 17 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 3 of 27) 18 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 4 of 27) 19 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 5 of 27) 20 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 6 of 27) 21 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 7 of 27) 22 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 8 of 27) 23 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 9 of 27) 24 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 10 of 27) 25 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 11 of 27) 26 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 12 of 27) 27 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 13 of 27) 28 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 14 of 27) 29 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 15 of 27) 30 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 16 of 27) 31 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 17 of 27) 32 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 18 of 27) 33 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 19 of 27) 34 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 20 of 27) 35 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 21 of 27) 36 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 22 of 27) 37 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 23 of 27) 38 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 24 of 27) 39 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 25 of 27) 40 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 26 of 27) 41 | Page
Letter 3 – California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Brandy Wood (Pg. 27 of 27) 42 | Page
2.7 Letter 3 – City of Holtville Response to Comments
Response to Comment 3-1: The comment provides introductory remarks and a description of the Department of Fish and Wildlife’s role in the CEQA review process. The comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
Response to Comment 3-2: The comment provides a summary of the Alamo River Trestle Bridge Project and includes information on the project’s objective and location. The comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
Response to Comment 3-3: The comment begins by stating the main issue being that the project description does not specify if project activities will occur in the Alamo River. The comment then proceeds to state that if project activities will impact resources in the Alamo River, the City will need to notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife for a Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSA) to avoid potential impacts to the River’s bed, bank, or channel, and the resources that rely upon it. Information regarding the legislative code and role the Department of Fish and Wildlife plays in protecting streams and the resources they provide is further listed in the comment.
The comment then recommends that the City updates the draft IS/MND to state whether the project will impact resources subject to Fish and Game Code Section 1602 and provide a description of the activities along with avoidance, minimization, or mitigation measures if the said resources are impacted by the project. If the project impacts the specified resources, the commenter further recommends that the Revised IS/MND requires notification to the Department of Fish and Wildlife for an LSA agreement along with required mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to the Alamo River to less than significant. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-5 was added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
BIO-5: LSA Agreement
If project activities occur in the Alamo River, CDFW will be notified for a Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSA) pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1602.
Response to Comment 3-4: The comment begins by stating a passage from the draft 43 | Page
IS/MND describing the findings of a biological survey along the river bluff conducted by the City in June of 2016. The Department of Fish and Wildlife expressed their concern about the potential of special status species being on or near the project site since their determination of the biological survey timing and scope was deemed to be insufficient to detect all special status species on or near the project site. The commenter further states that the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and data layers in the Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS) indicate that federal Endangered Species Actlisted, CESA-listed, or other special-status species have been reported or have the potential to occur in the Project area that were not addressed in the draft IS/MND.
The commenter points out that recent surveys during the appropriate times of the year are needed to identify potential impacts to biological resources; inform appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures; and determine whether impacts to biological resources have been mitigated to a level that is less than significant. One of the reasons for this determination is that specialstatus species may not be present during an individual survey and if migratory special-status species are present during other times of the year, they could be impacted by Project activities when timelines intersect.
The commenter ends the comment by recommending that the draft IS/MND be revised to include updated survey results following approved guidelines and protocols and provide an impact analysis. If the recommendation is not accepted by the City, the commenter recommends the inclusion of a new mitigation measure requiring a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within off-site areas with the potential to be affected prior to the start of construction activities. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-6 was added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
BIO-6: Biological Survey
Prior to Project construction activities, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within off-site areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern (SSC) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code §§ 3511, 4700, 5050, 5515), shall be completed.
Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition of endangered, rare, or threatened (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and 44 | Page
should not be limited to resident species. Species-specific surveys following protocols and guidelines, shall be completed by a Qualified Biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable speciesspecific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures shall be developed for present species in consultation with CDFW, which may include obtaining a CESA incidental take permit (ITP).
Response to Comment 3-5: The comment begins by stating that the biological report prepared by the City in 2016 is outdated and evaluation of the environmental baseline should be reconducted using proper surveying guidance and protocols for all biological resources. An outdated biological survey may not account for all current species and habitats present on the project site which may lead to potentially significant impacts to special-status species and other biological resources. The comment continued by stating that the lack of identification of present biological resources and unmitigated project activities can significantly impact special-status species through but not limited to direct mortality, destruction of foraging habitat, and/or destruction of nesting habitat.
The commenter recommends that the City of Holtville conduct new, speciesspecific biological survey for special-status species and sensitive natural communities near the project site following CDFW and USFWS guidelines and protocols. The Revised IS/MND should reflect the survey results of all specialstatus species and sensitive natural communities in the vicinity of the project site and note the presence and absence of species and sensitive natural communities. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-6 which requires a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within off-site areas with the potential to be affected prior to the start of construction activities was added to the Revised IS/MND. Refer to Response to Comment 3-4 for additional information.
Response to Comment 3-6: The comment begins by stating that the biological report prepared by the City in 2016 identified cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) near the project site, but the draft IS/MND does not described potential impacts nor mitigation to reduce any potential impact for these species. The comment continues by stating that removal of the sections of the Alamo River trestle bridge can result in harm to or take of the species and/or destruction of nests.
Removal and replacement of the existing Alamo River trestle bridge could also 45 | Page
cause disturbance to cliff swallow nesting areas which can lead to nest abandonment and loss of fecundity. The comment then provides legislating information prohibiting the taking, possession, or needless destruction of the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by the Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto.
The commenter recommends the inclusion of a mitigation measure in the Revised IS/MND if cliff swallow (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) presence identified in the project area by updated biological surveys. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-7 was added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
BIO-7: Swallow Nesting
Construction shall either occur outside of the swallow nesting period (generally March 15 through August 31), or the City of Holtville shall submit to CDFW, for review and approval, a Nesting Bird Avoidance Plan, prepared by a Qualified Avian Biologist which could include methods to deter swallow nesting.
Response to Comment 3-7: The comment begins by stating the Department of Fish and Wildlife’s concern that the draft IS/MND does not sufficiently identify and evaluate potential Project impacts to bat species or ensure that impacts are reduced to a level less than significant. The comment further states that there is the potential for multiple bat species on or near the project site and could also potentially night roost within the Alamo River trestle bridge. Another concern is the potential for multiple bat species to roost in cliff swallow mud-nests as well as the interstitial crevices between nests or between the nest and the structure, which are potentially present on the Alamo River trestle bridge. Disturbance of bat roosting habitats on the Alamo River trestle bridge due to removal of damaged bridge parts can potentially impact species of bats by direct mortality, roosting disturbances, and breeding disturbances. The comment then provides legislating information stating that the take (hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to do so; Fish & G. Code §86) of nongame mammals is prohibited by Fish and Game Code §4150.
The commenter reiterates the recommendation that a Revised IS/MND include the survey results of whether cliff swallow nests occur on the bridge and also include an analysis of the potential impacts to bats that may use these nests for roosting. The commenter further recommends the addition of a mitigation measure requiring the City of Holtville to retain a qualified bat biologist to conduct a bat roosting habitat suitability assessment of the structures, trees, and vegetation that may be removed, altered, or indirectly impacted by the 46 | Page
proposed Project. This comment has been noted. Mitigation measure BIO-6 requires a complete biological survey prior to construction and has already been incorporated to the Revised IS/MND (Refer to Response to Comment 3-4 for additional information). Mitigation measure BIO-8 was also added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
BIO-8: Bat Species
Prior to the start of Project activities, the City of Holtville shall retain a Qualified Bat Biologist to conduct a bat roosting habitat suitability assessment of the structures, trees, and vegetation that may be removed, altered, or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project. Within suitable bat roosting habitat, the Qualified Bat Biologist shall conduct surveys to determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by the Qualified Bat Biologist. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Surveys shall be conducted within one 24- hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre-dawn re-entry surveys, and to determine if night roosting is occurring in the area. The following actions will also be conducted as needed:
• If bats are found using any trees or structures within the Project area, including the bridge and any cliff swallow nests on the bridge, the Qualified Bat Biologist shall identify the bats to the species level and evaluate the colony, if applicable, to determine its size and significance.
The bat survey results shall include: 1) the exact location of all roosting sites (location shall be described and mapped); 2) the number of bats present at the time of visit (count or estimate); 3) each species of bat present (including how the species was identified); 4) the location of all signs of bats (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks, and bats squeaking and chattering)(described and mapped); 5) the type of roost: maternity roost, winter roost (hibernacula), and night roost (resting at night while out feeding) versus a day roost (resting all day) must also be clearly stated; and 6) proposed avoidance and minimization measures, including avoidance of bats in swallow nests. The results of the survey shall be submitted to CDFW for review prior to initiating Project activities.
• If active maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet 47 | Page
extending from the work area, Project construction within these areas shall only occur generally between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost. Appropriate time to start Project construction to avoid impact shall be confirmed by a Qualified Bat Biologist. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed.
• If active hibernacula (winter roosts) are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area, a minimum 500-foot no-work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced.
Project-related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until the end of Project construction and activities or until a Qualified Bat Biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active.
Project-related construction and activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of a hibernacula is not feasible, the Qualified Bat Biologist will prepare • If active hibernacula (winter roosts) are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area, a minimum 500-foot no-work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced.
Project-related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until the end of Project construction and activities or until a Qualified Bat Biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active.
Project-related construction and activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of a hibernacula is not feasible, the Qualified Bat Biologist will prepare a relocation plan to remove the hibernacula and provide for construction of an alternative bat roost outside of the work area. A bat roost relocation plan prepared by the Qualified Bat Biologist shall be submitted for CDFW review and approval prior to relocation and construction activities. The Qualified Bat Biologist will implement the relocation plan and new roost sites shall be in place before the commencement of any grounddisturbing activities that will occur within 500 feet of the hibernacula. New roost sites shall also be in place with sufficient timing prior to the initiation of Project-related activities to allow bat relocation, with the timing specified by the Qualified Bat Biologist with consideration of the species.
Removal of roosts shall be guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent 48 | Page
techniques developed by the Qualified Bat Biologist. The City shall compensate no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting habitat with replacement and permanent protection of roost habitat.
Response to Comment 3-8: The comment begins by stating the Department of Fish and Wildlife’s concern that the Draft IS/MND does not sufficiently identify potential Project impacts to Yuma Ridgway’s rail (Rallus obsoletus yumanensis), a CESA-listed threatened species, and fully protected species, or ensure that impacts are reduced to a level less than significant. The comment continues by stating that the project may result in adverse impacts to this CESA-listed and state fully protected species due to habitat modification, loss of foraging habitat, and/or interruption of migratory and breeding behaviors through the removal of vegetation, damaged portions of the Alamo River trestle bridge, and noise during project activities. The comment then provides legislating information which prohibits the take (under Fish & G. Code, § 86, “take” means to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or to attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill) of any endangered, threatened, or candidate species that results from a proposed project, except as authorized by state law (Fish & G. Code, §§ 2080, 2085).
The commenter then reiterates that the 2016 biological report prepared by the City is out of date, and recommends that protocol-level surveys be conducted to determine the presence or absence of Yuma Ridgway’s rail on the Project site and a 500-foot buffer. The commenter further recommends that the City of Holtville include in the analysis how appropriate avoidance measures will reduce direct and indirect impacts to species to a level less than significant. Project activities described in the Draft IS/MND should generally be designed to completely avoid any fully protected species that have the potential to be present within or adjacent to the Project area. The comment concluded by recommending a mitigation measure requiring a licensed biologist to perform presence/absence surveys according to the Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey Protocol for Project Evaluation within a 500-foot buffer of the project prior to the start of construction activities. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-9 was added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
BIO-9: Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey
Prior to the start of Project activities, a biologist who has a valid 10(a)(1)(A) Fish and Wildlife Service recovery permit and a CDFW CESA Memorandum of Understanding for Yuma Ridgway’s rail shall perform presence/absence surveys according to the Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey Protocol for Project 49 | Page
Evaluation within a 500-foot buffer of the Project. The survey requires 6 callback surveys between March 1 and May 15. If presence of Yuma Ridgway’s rail is detected, Project activities that require the use of heavy equipment shall not take place during the species peak breeding season (generally February 15 to September 30). CDFW shall be notified in writing of the detection of this species within three (3) days. If protocol surveys indicate this species is not present within the 500-foot buffer, Project activities may proceed subject to the other provisions of federal and state law. The results of the protocol surveys shall be provided to CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities.
Response to Comment 3-9: The comment begins by stating the Department of Fish and Wildlife’s concern that the project site potentially contains suitable habitat for western burrowing owl, a CESA-listed candidate species and that the Draft IS/MND does not analyze or identify potential impact nor propose mitigation for any potential loss of nesting burrows, satellite burrows, foraging habitat, dispersal and migration habitat, wintering habitat, and habitat linkages, including habitat supporting prey and host burrowers, and other essential habitat attributes. The comment continues by stating that western burrowing owls are dependent on burrows at all times of the year for survival and/or reproduction, evicting them from nesting, roosting, and satellite burrows may lead to indirect impacts or take. Loss of access to burrows will likely result in varying levels of increased stress on western burrowing owls and could depress reproduction, increase predation, increase energetic costs, and introduce risks posed by having to find and compete for available burrows. As written, the Draft IS/MND only requires replacement of burrows determined to be occupied at the time of preconstruction surveys and does not analyze temporal consideration of species occupancy and their use of the surrounding landscape for survival. The comment then provides legislating information which lists the western burrowing owl as a candidate species and is granted full protection of a threatened or endangered species under CESA.
The commenter then recommends that the City of Holtville perform breeding and non-breeding surveys per the guidance of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012), assess the impact, and create a mitigation measure to include avoidance, minimization, and mitigation for burrowing owls identified on-site, and these same measures be applied to any individuals found during take avoidance surveys as conditions by the proposed mitigation measure. The commenter further recommends the guidance of mitigating impacts to burrowing owls in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012) be followed, including (a) permanent impacts to nesting, occupied and satellite burrows and/or burrowing owl habitat such that the habitat 50 | Page
acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owls impacted are replaced with permanent conservation of similar vegetation communities (grassland, scrublands, desert, urban, and agriculture) to provide for burrowing owl nesting, foraging, wintering, and dispersal (i.e., during breeding and non-breeding seasons) comparable to or better than that of the impact area, and (b) sufficiently large acreage, and presence of fossorial mammals. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-10 was added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
BIO-10: Burrowing Owl Breeding and Non-breeding Surveys The City of Holtville shall perform breeding and non-breeding surveys per the guidance of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012), assess the impact, and create mitigation measures to include avoidance, minimization, and mitigation for any burrowing owls identified on-site, and these same measures be applied to any individuals found during any take avoidance surveys. The guidance of mitigating impacts to burrowing owls in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012) shall be followed, including (a) permanent impacts to nesting, occupied and satellite burrows and/or burrowing owl habitat such that the habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owls impacted are replaced with permanent conservation of similar vegetation communities (grassland, scrublands, desert, urban, and agriculture) to provide for burrowing owl nesting, foraging, wintering, and dispersal (i.e., during breeding and non-breeding seasons) comparable to or better than that of the impact area, and (b) sufficiently large acreage, and presence of fossorial mammals.
Response to Comment 3-10: The comment begins by stating that the Draft IS/MND provides no avoidance, minimization, or mitigation measures for the potential impacts to arrow-weed thickets. Arrow weed thickets are listed on the CDFW Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program’s (VegCAMP) Sensitive Natural Communities Only by Life Form list (CDFW, June 2023) as a S3 state rarity ranking. Natural Communities with ranks of S1-S3 are considered Sensitive Natural Communities to be addressed in the environmental review process of CEQA.
The commenter then recommends that the City of Holtville includes a mitigation measure requiring the City to avoid impacts to arrow-weed thickets or restore the habitat to pre-project conditions if avoidance is unfeasible. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-11 was added to the Revised IS/MND which states the following:
51 | Page
BIO-11: Arrow-weed Thickets
To the greatest extent practicable, all project plans shall avoid impacts to arrowweed thickets. If arrow-weed thickets cannot be avoided, the City of Holtville shall restore the habitat to pre-project conditions, or compensatory mitigation for direct and permanent impacts consisting of habitat acquisition at a minimum of a 2:1 ratio. Habitat acquisition sites shall be biologically equal or superior to existing conditions and shall be conserved and managed in perpetuity.
Response to Comment 3-11: The comment begins by stating that the project activities may result in the degradation and permanent loss of nesting bird habitats and may also result in direct mortality and/or injury to nesting birds and take of their nests onsite through trimming/removing vegetation along the Alamo River Walking Trail. Direct take may result from vehicle and equipment strikes and from predators attracted to the construction site. Indirect take may result from displacement, reduction of habitat and habitat quality, and from impacted foraging and nesting habitat. Additionally, construction during the breeding season of nesting birds could potentially result in the incidental loss of breeding success or otherwise lead to nest abandonment. Noise from road use, generators, and heavy equipment may disrupt nesting bird mating calls or songs, which could impact reproductive success. The comment then provides legislative information such as Fish and Game Code section 3503 which makes it unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto.
The commenter then recommends that the City of Holtville make changes to mitigation measure BIO-1 to prevent or reduce impacts to nesting birds. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-1 was modified as follows:
BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey
If construction is planned between the dates of February 15 through September 1, a nesting bird survey prior to construction is required to prevent violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Within seven (7) days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a preconstruction survey within 500 feet of the proposed work limits. If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities. 52 | Page
a. To minimize avoid impacts to nesting birds in the Project Site, the Qualified Avian Biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys of all potential raptor and passerine nesting habitat within the Project Site. The raptor survey shall focus on potential nest sites (i.e., utility poles and trees) within a 300-foot buffer around the Project site. These surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to ground-disturbing activities. The Qualified Avian Biologist must be able to determine the status and stage of nesting migratory birds and all locally breeding passerine and raptor species without causing intrusive disturbance. b. If active nests are found, within the Project area or within 500 feet of the Project area, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans and a suitable buffer based on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance, and as determined by the Qualified Avian Biologist shall be established around active nests, and no construction within the buffer shall be allowed until the Qualified Avian Biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., the nestlings have fledged and are no longer reliant on the nest). Buffers may be reduced at the discretion of the Qualified Avian Biologist based on Project activity, line of sight, tolerance of individuals, and stage of the nest. The nest area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing.
On-site construction monitoring shall be conducted when construction occurs in close proximately to an active nest buffer. The buffer shall remain in place until determined by the Qualified Avian Biologist that the nestlings have fledged, and the nest is no longer active. If an active nest is encountered during the Project construction, construction shall stop immediately until a Qualified Avian Biologist can determine (1) the status of the nest, and (2) when work can proceed without risking violation to state or federal laws.
Response to Comment 3-12: The comment begins by stating that the Draft IS/MND does not include an assessment of impacts to biological resources resulting from construction noise nor mitigation measures to avoid or reduce impacts to a level less than significant. Noise from Project activities can impact many species by disrupting breeding cycles and foraging opportunities. These impacts can greatly reduce the fecundity of species. Construction may result in substantial noise through road use, equipment, and other Project-related activities.
Because of the potential for construction noise to negatively impact wildlife, the commenter recommends the inclusion of a mitigation measure restricting construction noise generated by the project in the Revised IS/MND to replace the portions of MM BIO-3 regarding construction noise. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-3 was replaced as follows:
53 | Page
BIO-3: Noise Mitigation Program
If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then construction activities may proceed within 300 feet of the fledged nest(s)
During all Project construction, the City of Holtville shall restrict use of equipment to hours least likely to disrupt wildlife (e.g., not at night or in early morning) and restrict use of generators except for temporary use in emergencies. Power to sites can be provided by solar PV (photovoltaic) systems, cogeneration systems (natural gas generator), small micro-hydroelectric systems, or small wind turbine systems. The City of Holtville shall ensure the use of noise suppression devices such as mufflers or enclosures for generators. Sounds generated from any means must be below the 55-60 dB range within 50-feet from the source.
Response to Comment 3-13: The comment begins by stating that the Draft IS/MND does not analyze impacts to biological resources from artificial nighttime lighting and includes no mitigation measures to avoid or reduce impacts to biological resources to a level less than significant. Designs for lighting to be used during operation of the project should be included in a Revised IS/MND, along with details of artificial nighttime lighting to be used during construction. The direct and indirect impacts of artificial nighttime lighting on biological resources including migratory birds that fly at night, bats, and other nocturnal and crepuscular wildlife should be analyzed, and appropriate avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to less than significant should be included in a Revised IS/MND. Artificial light can also impact special-status species by disrupting circadian rhythms, interfering with foraging and protection from predators, causing confusion with migration patterns.
Because of the potential for artificial nighttime lighting to negatively impact wildlife, CDFW recommends that a Revised IS/MND include a light impact assessment and an analysis of impacts to biological resources accompanied by specific avoidance and minimization measures to ensure that impacts to wildlife are avoided or reduced to less than significant. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-12 was added which states the following:
BIO-12: Nighttime Lighting
During Project construction and operations over the lifetime of the Project, the 54 | Page
City of Holtville shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City of Holtville shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and away from surrounding open-space areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association standards at https://darksky.org/). The City of Holtville shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler.
Response to Comment 3-14: The comment begins by stating that the project has the potential to result in permanent and temporary loss, degradation, and impacts to western burrowing owl habitat. The project may result in the take of western burrowing owl, a CESA candidate species, during construction of the project and life of the project. The Draft IS/MND describes that no burrows were located on-site, and no sign of burrowing owl were observed, however since the time of surveying, western burrowing owl could have potentially inhabited the site. If western burrowing owl has inhabited the site the potential for the collapsing of burrows, entombment, displacement, direct take associated with vehicle and equipment strike, indirect take associated with project operations such as attracting predators, reduction of habitat and habitat quality could occur. The comment then provides legislative information supporting CDFW’s findings that the take of burrowing owl and the loss of the species’ habitat as a significant impact unless mitigation to a level less than significant is included.
The commenter then recommends that the City of Holtville make changes to mitigation measure BIO-4 to avoid impacts to CESA candidate species and the inclusion of mitigation measure BIO-13 to include avoidance, minimization or mitigation measures. This comment has been noted, and mitigation measure BIO-4 was updated, and mitigation measure BIO-13 was added as follows:
BIO-4: Burrowing Owl
Although there were no sensitive species identified by the study, and more specifically, no burrowing owls, the following mitigation measures shall be shown on building plans as details, notes or as otherwise appropriate in the event that burrowing owls are identified during the pre-construction survey:
Western Burrowing Owl. If complete avoidance cannot be achieved an CESA Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for western burrowing owl shall be obtained prior 55 | Page
to initiation of ground disturbing activities. The Project proponent shall adhere to measures and conditions set forth within the ITP. Compensatory mitigation for direct impacts to the species shall be fulfilled at a minimum 1:1 ratio through purchase of available western burrowing owl conservation bank credits suitable for CESA mitigation (if available), perpetual conservation and management of suitable and occupied western burrowing owl habitat of equal or better quality, or another method as reviewed and approved by CDFW.
a. In the event that an active burrow is found, the active burrow that is in the zone of construction should be passively relocated, following guidelines found within California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) guidelines with consultation with CDFG Bermuda Dunes office. Prior to relocation, two artificial burrows per active burrow to be closed will be installed in the vicinity of the trail Alamo River. Burrowing Owl Avoidance. If burrowing owls are detected on-site, a Qualified Biologist, knowledgeable of burrowing owl habitat and behavior, shall establish a no-disturbance buffer following the guidelines within the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (or most recent version) around all burrowing owl burrows such as roosting and satellite burrows within the Project area and an appropriate buffer determined by the Qualified Biologist, with posted signs demarking the area to avoid, using stakes, flags, and/or rope or cord to minimize the disturbance of burrowing owl habitat. The Qualified Biologist shall delineate burrows with different materials than those used to delineate the Project area, and the materials shall not attract raptor perching. Project proponent shall remove and properly dispose of all materials used for delineation immediately upon completion of the Project.
b. Burrowing owl worker training should be given to construction workers prior to the start of work by a qualified biologist, which would include the following information: To ensure that the Project avoids impacts to burrowing owl, a Qualified Biologist shall complete a take avoidance survey no less than 14 days prior to initiating ground disturbance activities using the recommended methods described in the 2012 Staff Report. Burrowing owls may re-colonize a site after only a few days. Time lapses or a break in construction activities of 3 days will trigger subsequent take avoidance surveys including but not limited to a final survey conducted within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance. • Distribution
56 | Page
• General behavior and ecology
• Sensitivity to human activities
• Legal protection
• Penalties for violations of State or Federal laws
• Reporting requirements
• Project protective mitigation measures
• A wallet card will be given to each worker
c. During take avoidance surveys the Project proponent shall have a Qualified Biologist(s), pre-approved by CDFW, inspect all burrows that exhibit typical characteristics of burrowing owl activity prior to any sitepreparation activities. Evidence of owl activity may include presence of owls themselves, burrows, and owl sign at burrow entrances such as pellets, whitewash or other “ornamentation,” feathers, prey remains, etc.
If it is evident that the burrows are actively being used, the Project proponent shall follow the guidelines in the CDFW approved Burrowing Owl Plan and Conditions of Approval within the CESA ITP. If no Plan has been approved or CESA ITP obtained, the Project proponent shall not commence activities until owls have been confirmed absent and the burrows are no longer in use by adult or juvenile owls or until a Burrowing Owl Plan has been submitted and approved, and a CESA ITP obtained.
BIO-13: Education Program
A Qualified Biologist shall conduct an education program for all persons employed or otherwise working on the Project site prior to performing any work on-site (Workers Environmental Awareness Program; WEAP). The WEAP shall consist of a presentation that includes a discussion of the biology of the habitats and species that may be present at the site. The WEAP shall also include information on the distribution and habitat needs of any special-status species that may be present, legal protections for those species, penalties for violations, and mitigation measures. The WEAP shall include, but not be limited to: (1) best practices for managing waste and reducing activities that can lead to increased occurrences of opportunistic species and the impacts these species can have on wildlife in the area and (2) protected species that have the potential to occur on the Project site. Interpretation shall be provided for any non-English speaking 57 | Page
workers, and the same instruction shall be provided for any individual prior to their performing any work onsite.
Response to Comment 3-15: The comment provides instructions and website links for submitting CEQA documents and project surveys to the state for review.
Additional information on CDFW environmental submittals and filing fees is also provided. The comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
Response to Comment 3-16: The comment provides closing remarks and contact information to send any questions regarding the review letter. The comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
Response to Comment 3-17: The comment provides references for the information cited throughout the comment letter. The comment does not address the adequacy of the environmental analysis; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
Response to Comment 3-18: The comment provides a table with the mitigation measures CDFW recommend be added or modified in the Revised IS/MND. A response for each comment and mitigation measure has already been addressed in prior responses; therefore, no changes to the Revised IS/MND in response to this comment are necessary.
3.0 Errata and Changes to the Draft IS/MND
3.1 Revisions
Minor editorial revisions were made in the Draft IS/MND in the following sections:
• Cover Page (Page 1)
• Project Description (Page 2)
• Environmental Factors Potentially Affected (Page 6)
• Section III. Air Quality (Page 12)
• Section VII. Geology and Soils (Pages 28 – 31)
• Section XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Pages 49) • Appendix A (Added)
Revisions to the Draft IS/MND based on the California Department of Transportation comment letter (Letter 1) received:
58 | Page
• Revisions associated with comments 1-2 and 1-3: Section XVII. Transportation and Traffic Impacts and Discussion on page 42 of the Revised MND was revised to include the addition of text as follows:
“a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? - No Impact - The proposed project will not conflict with any circulation program, plan, ordinance, or policy. Rather than conflict, the project furthers program number 6 of the Circulation Element of the 2017 General Plan which consists of developing a pedestrian and bicycle network with the goal of connecting public, residential, and business areas within the City of Holtville. Furthermore, the proposed project will not cause the traffic impact threshold guidelines established by the State or City of Holtville to be exceeded. Therefore, the project will have no impact. While the project is expected to have no impact, the following mitigation measures are being implemented to account for any vehicle or combination of vehicles of a size or weight exceeding the maximum limitations from the California Vehicle Code operating or moving through State Route 115 during the project’s construction phase.
Mitigation Measures:
TRANSP-1: Department of Transportation Hauling/Traffic Permit Prior to the start of any construction activities, the City shall acquire a permit from the Department of Transportation to operate or move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special mobile equipment, of a size or weight of vehicle or load exceeding the maximum limitations specified in the California Vehicle Code, on State Route 115 or any other facility under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
TRANSP-2: Department of Transportation Encroachment Permit Should any work within the Department of Transportation Right-of-Way be required for the project, the City shall acquire an encroachment permit from the Department of Transportation prior to the start of construction activities within their Right-of-Way.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville 59 | Page
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
TRANSP-3: Perpetuation of Monuments
Per Business and Profession Code 8771, perpetuation of survey monuments shall be carried out by a licensed land surveyor should any existing monuments be destroyed by construction activities related to the project.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville”
• Revisions associated with comment 2-4: Section III. Air Quality on page 12 of the Revised IS/MND was revised to include the addition of text as follows:
“The project site is located within the Salton Sea Air Basin. The Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) is responsible for ensuring that all State and Federal ambient air quality standards are achieved and maintained within the County of Imperial. The County of Imperial is designated as a “non-attainment” area with respect to Federal Standards for both particulate matter (PM10) and ozone (smog). Rural single-family homes are within a quarter mile of the project site and immediate vicinity which are considered sensitive receptors. Grading and construction activities of the proposed project may generate significant amounts of dust (PM 10). It is estimated that construction will take approximately two (2) months to complete. Mitigation measures will need to be incorporated to lessen impacts from dust, in accordance with ICAPCD regulations.
Additionally, the project will comply with all ICAPCD rules and regulations.” • Revisions associated with comments 3-3 and 3-14: Section IV. Biological Resources pages 15 – 22 of the Revised IS/MND was revised to include the addition of text as follows:
“A formal biological survey was conducted in June of 2016 for the City of Holtville Alamo River Wetlands Walking Trail project which stretches approximately 1.3 miles from Earl Walker Park, 500 feet south of the project site, to the City of Holtville Wetlands north of the project site. While the survey spans the length of the proposed Alamo River Walking trail, the trestle bridge project is well within the biological surveys scope given that the trestle bridge and portions of the trail to be improved are part of the overall Alamo River Trail project. The 2016 biological survey concluded by stating that no riparian habitats nor any endangered, threatened, or species of concern would be affected (See Appendix A - Biological Report). 60 | Page
Nonetheless, the age of the survey coupled with potential disturbance from construction activities within this area may potentially impact the biological resources in the area thus requiring mitigation measures to reduce the impact to less than significant. is still a possibility and recommended mitigation measures will be in place.
Biological Resources Impact Discussion:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation is Incorporated - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail. The 2016 biological survey determined that no endangered, threatened, or species of concern would be affected by the Alamo River Trail project which encompasses the proposed trestle bridge repairs and trail improvements. The survey further focused on searching for signs of Burrowing Owl (BUOW) activity but made no such findings and determined that the habitat is not favorable to burrowing and that the burrowing owl would not be expected in the trail area which includes the project site. While the survey did not identify any impact on endangered, threatened, or species of concern, the survey’s age is a concern since it does not fully account for the current conditions of the project site and the single survey may not address all potential impacts to biological resources in the area. Therefore, the City of Holtville will still implement the following measures as recommended by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW): the survey Mitigation Measures
BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey
If construction is planned between the dates of February 15 through September 1, a nesting bird survey prior to construction is required to prevent violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Within seven (7) days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a preconstruction survey within 500 feet of the proposed work limits.
61 | Page
a) To minimize avoid impacts to nesting birds in the Project Site, the Qualified Avian Biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys of all potential raptor and passerine nesting habitat within the Project Site.
The raptor survey shall focus on potential nest sites (i.e., utility poles and trees) within a 300-foot buffer around the Project site. These surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to grounddisturbing activities. The Qualified Avian Biologist must be able to determine the status and stage of nesting migratory birds and all locally breeding passerine and raptor species without causing intrusive disturbance.
b) If active nests are found, within the Project area or within 500 feet of the Project area, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans and a suitable buffer based on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance, and as determined by the Qualified Avian Biologist shall be established around active nests, and no construction within the buffer shall be allowed until the Qualified Avian Biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., the nestlings have fledged and are no longer reliant on the nest).
Buffers may be reduced at the discretion of the Qualified Avian Biologist based on Project activity, line of sight, tolerance of individuals, and stage of the nest. The nest area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. On-site construction monitoring shall be conducted when construction occurs in close proximately to an active nest buffer. The buffer shall remain in place until determined by the Qualified Avian Biologist that the nestlings have fledged, and the nest is no longer active. If an active nest is encountered during the Project construction, construction shall stop immediately until a Qualified Avian Biologist can determine (1) the status of the nest, and (2) when work can proceed without risking violation to state or federal laws.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-2: Buffers
If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities.
62 | Page
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/Contractor Licensed Biologist and Contractor
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-3: Noise Mitigation Program
If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then construction activities may proceed within 300 feet of the fledged nest(s). During all Project construction, the City of Holtville shall restrict use of equipment to hours least likely to disrupt wildlife (e.g., not at night or in early morning) and restrict use of generators except for temporary use in emergencies. Power to sites can be provided by solar PV (photovoltaic) systems, cogeneration systems (natural gas generator), small micro-hydroelectric systems, or small wind turbine systems. The City of Holtville shall ensure the use of noise suppression devices such as mufflers or enclosures for generators. Sounds generated from any means must be below the 55-60 dB range within 50-feet from the source.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to During Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-4: Burrowing Owl
Although there were no sensitive species identified by the study, and more specifically, no burrowing owls, the following mitigation measures shall be shown on building plans as details, notes or as otherwise appropriate in the event that burrowing owls are identified during the pre-construction survey:
Western Burrowing Owl. If complete avoidance cannot be achieved an CESA Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for western burrowing owl shall be obtained prior to initiation of ground disturbing activities. The Project proponent shall adhere to measures and conditions set forth within the ITP.
Compensatory mitigation for direct impacts to the species shall be fulfilled at a minimum 1:1 ratio through purchase of available western burrowing owl conservation bank credits suitable for CESA mitigation (if available), perpetual conservation and management of suitable and occupied western burrowing owl habitat of equal or better quality, or another method as reviewed and approved by CDFW.
63 | Page
a) In the event that an active burrow is found, the active burrow that is in the zone of construction should be passively relocated, following guidelines found within California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) guidelines with consultation with CDFG Bermuda Dunes office. Prior to relocation, two artificial burrows per active burrow to be closed will be installed in the vicinity of the trail Alamo River.
Burrowing Owl Avoidance. If burrowing owls are detected on-site, a Qualified Biologist, knowledgeable of burrowing owl habitat and behavior, shall establish a no-disturbance buffer following the guidelines within the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (or most recent version) around all burrowing owl burrows such as roosting and satellite burrows within the Project area and an appropriate buffer determined by the Qualified Biologist, with posted signs demarking the area to avoid, using stakes, flags, and/or rope or cord to minimize the disturbance of burrowing owl habitat. The Qualified Biologist shall delineate burrows with different materials than those used to delineate the Project area, and the materials shall not attract raptor perching. Project proponent shall remove and properly dispose of all materials used for delineation immediately upon completion of the Project.
b) Burrowing owl worker training should be given to construction workers prior to the start of work by a qualified biologist, which would include the following information: To ensure that the Project avoids impacts to burrowing owl, a Qualified Biologist shall complete a take avoidance survey no less than 14 days prior to initiating ground disturbance activities using the recommended methods described in the 2012 Staff Report. Burrowing owls may re-colonize a site after only a few days. Time lapses or a break in construction activities of 3 days will trigger subsequent take avoidance surveys including but not limited to a final survey conducted within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance.
• Distribution
• General behavior and ecology
• Sensitivity to human activities
• Legal protection
• Penalties for violation of State or Federal Laws
64 | Page
• Reporting requirements
• Project protective mitigation measures
• A wallet card will be given to each worker
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville, Qualified Biologist, CDFW, and Contractor
BIO-5: LSA Agreement
If project activities occur in the Alamo River, CDFW will be notified for a Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSA) pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1602.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/City of Holtville and CDFW Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-6: Biological Survey
Prior to Project construction activities, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within off-site areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern (SSC) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code §§ 3511, 4700, 5050, 5515), shall be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition of endangered, rare, or threatened (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Species-specific surveys following protocols and guidelines, shall be completed by a Qualified Biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species-specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures shall be developed for present species in consultation with CDFW, which may include obtaining a CESA incidental take permit (ITP).
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-7: Swallow Nesting
Construction shall either occur outside of the swallow nesting period 65 | Page
(generally March 15 through August 31), or the City of Holtville shall submit to CDFW, for review and approval, a Nesting Bird Avoidance Plan, prepared by a Qualified Avian Biologist which could include methods to deter swallow nesting.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/City of Holtville and CDFW
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-8: Bat Species
Prior to the start of Project activities, the City of Holtville shall retain a Qualified Bat Biologist to conduct a bat roosting habitat suitability assessment of the structures, trees, and vegetation that may be removed, altered, or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project. Within suitable bat roosting habitat, the Qualified Bat Biologist shall conduct surveys to determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by the Qualified Bat Biologist. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre-dawn re-entry surveys, and to determine if night roosting is occurring in the area.
The following actions will also be conducted as needed:
• If bats are found using any trees or structures within the Project area, including the bridge and any cliff swallow nests on the bridge, the Qualified Bat Biologist shall identify the bats to the species level and evaluate the colony, if applicable, to determine its size and significance. The bat survey results shall include: 1) the exact location of all roosting sites (location shall be described and mapped); 2) the number of bats present at the time of visit (count or estimate); 3) each species of bat present (including how the species was identified); 4) the location of all signs of bats (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks, and bats squeaking and chattering)(described and mapped); 5) the type of roost: maternity roost, winter roost (hibernacula), and night roost (resting at night while out feeding) versus a day roost (resting all day) must also be clearly stated; and 6) proposed avoidance and 66 | Page
minimization measures, including avoidance of bats in swallow nests. The results of the survey shall be submitted to CDFW for review prior to initiating Project activities.
• If active maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area, Project construction within these areas shall only occur generally between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost. Appropriate time to start Project construction to avoid impact shall be confirmed by a Qualified Bat Biologist. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed.
• If active hibernacula (winter roosts) are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area, a minimum 500-foot no-work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced. Project-related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until the end of Project construction and activities or until a Qualified Bat Biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active. Project-related construction and activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of a hibernacula is not feasible, the Qualified Bat Biologist will prepare a relocation plan to remove the hibernacula and provide for construction of an alternative bat roost outside of the work area. A bat roost relocation plan prepared by the Qualified Bat Biologist shall be submitted for CDFW review and approval prior to relocation and construction activities. The Qualified Bat Biologist will implement the relocation plan and new roost sites shall be in place before the commencement of any ground-disturbing activities that will occur within 500 feet of the hibernacula. New roost sites shall also be in place with sufficient timing prior to the initiation of Project-related activities to allow bat relocation, with the timing specified by the Qualified Bat Biologist with consideration of the species. Removal of roosts shall be guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent techniques developed by the Qualified Bat Biologist.
The City shall compensate no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting habitat with replacement and permanent protection of roost habitat.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist 67 | Page
Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-9: Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey
Prior to the start of Project activities, a biologist who has a valid 10(a)(1)(A) Fish and Wildlife Service recovery permit and a CDFW CESA Memorandum of Understanding for Yuma Ridgway’s rail shall perform presence/absence surveys according to the Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey Protocol for Project Evaluation within a 500-foot buffer of the Project. The survey requires 6 callback surveys between March 1 and May 15. If presence of Yuma Ridgway’s rail is detected, Project activities that require the use of heavy equipment shall not take place during the species peak breeding season (generally February 15 to September 30). CDFW shall be notified in writing of the detection of this species within three (3) days. If protocol surveys indicate this species is not present within the 500-foot buffer, Project activities may proceed subject to the other provisions of federal and state law. The results of the protocol surveys shall be provided to CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-10: Burrowing Owl Breeding and Non-breeding Surveys The City of Holtville shall perform breeding and non-breeding surveys per the guidance of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012), assess the impact, and create mitigation measures to include avoidance, minimization, and mitigation for any burrowing owls identified on-site, and these same measures be applied to any individuals found during any take avoidance surveys. The guidance of mitigating impacts to burrowing owls in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012) shall be followed, including (a) permanent impacts to nesting, occupied and satellite burrows and/or burrowing owl habitat such that the habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owls impacted are replaced with permanent conservation of similar vegetation communities (grassland, scrublands, desert, urban, and agriculture) to provide for burrowing owl nesting, foraging, wintering, and dispersal (i.e., during breeding and non-breeding seasons) comparable to or better than that of the impact area, and (b) sufficiently large acreage, and presence of fossorial mammals.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-11: Arrow-weed Thickets
68 | Page
To the greatest extent practicable, all project plans shall avoid impacts to arrow-weed thickets. If arrow-weed thickets cannot be avoided, the City of Holtville shall restore the habitat to pre-project conditions, or compensatory mitigation for direct and permanent impacts consisting of habitat acquisition at a minimum of a 2:1 ratio. Habitat acquisition sites shall be biologically equal or superior to existing conditions and shall be conserved and managed in perpetuity.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-12: Nighttime Lighting
During Project construction and operations over the lifetime of the Project, the City of Holtville shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City of Holtville shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and away from surrounding open-space areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association standards at https://darksky.org/). The City of Holtville shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during Construction/Contractor Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
BIO-13: Education Program
A Qualified Biologist shall conduct an education program for all persons employed or otherwise working on the Project site prior to performing any work on-site (Workers Environmental Awareness Program; WEAP). The WEAP shall consist of a presentation that includes a discussion of the biology of the habitats and species that may be present at the site. The WEAP shall also include information on the distribution and habitat needs of any special-status species that may be present, legal protections for those species, penalties for violations, and mitigation measures. The WEAP shall include, but not be limited to: (1) best practices for managing waste and reducing activities that can lead to increased occurrences of opportunistic species and the impacts these species can have on wildlife in 69 | Page
the area and (2) protected species that have the potential to occur on the Project site. Interpretation shall be provided for any non-English speaking workers, and the same instruction shall be provided for any individual prior to their performing any work onsite.
Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction/Licensed Biologist Enforcement/Monitoring: City of Holtville
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Measures are Incorporation - Sensitive habitats are those that are designated either rare within the region by governmental agencies or known to support sensitive animal or plant species and/or they serve as "corridors" for wildlife within the region. The vegetation community along the Alamo Riverbanks mainly consists of weedy plants such as salt cedar, fragmites and arrowweed. The proposed project consists of the replacement of the damaged structural components of the trestle bridge, the installation of a new pedestrian walkway on the top deck of the bridge, and improvements to the existing Alamo River Trail.
While the project is not proposing to remove any existing vegetation, the City will strive to avoid and minimize impacts to the vegetation to the greatest extent possible. Furthermore, the 2016 biological survey concluded that no riparian habitats nor any endangered, threatened, or species of concern would be affected by the Alamo River Trail project which encompasses the proposed project area.
While the survey did not identify any impact to riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities, the City of Holtville will still implement the following mitigation measures as recommended by CDFW the survey.
Mitigation Measures
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey Implement Mitigation measure BIO-2: Buffers
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-3: Noise Mitigation Program Implement Mitigation measure BIO-4: Burrowing Owl
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-5: Streambed Alteration Agreement
70 | Page
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-6: Biological Survey
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-7: Swallow Nesting
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-8: Bat Species
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-9: Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey Implement Mitigation measure BIO-10: Burrowing Owl Breeding and Non-breeding Surveys
Implement Mitigation measure BIO-11: Arrow-weed Thickets Implement Mitigation measure BIO-12: Nighttime Lighting Implement Mitigation measure BIO-13: Education Program” 71 | Page
4.0and Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21081.6 mandates that the following requirements shall apply to all reporting or mitigation monitoring programs:
• The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a Responsible Agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program.
• The Lead Agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. A public agency shall provide measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment that are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. • Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), a Responsible Agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the Lead Agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the Lead Agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a Lead Agency by a Responsible Agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures that mitigate impacts to resources, which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit that authority of the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the Lead Agency, to approve, 72 | Page
condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law.
4.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Procedures
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared in compliance with PRC Section 21081.6. It describes the requirements and procedures to be followed by the City of Holtville Planning and Building Department to ensure that all mitigation measures or required project design features (PDF) adopted as part of the proposed project will be carried out as described in this Revised IS/MND. Table 2 lists each of the mitigation measures or project design features specified in this document and identifies the party or parties responsible for implementation and monitoring of each measure.
73 | Page
Table 2. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measures Enforcement Timing/Implementation
Compliance
Verification (Date
and Signature
Required)
1. AESTHETICS
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
3. AIR QUALITY
AQ-1: Dust Control Plan: The contractor shall submit
a Dust Control Plan identifying all sources of PM10
Emissions to ICAPCD for approval. Construction of
the project site will be subject to the requirements of ICAPCD Rule 800, Fugitive Dust Requirement for
control of fine particulate matter (PM10).
• Inactive Construction Areas: Apply non-toxic
soil stabilizers, dust suppressants, tarps, or
other suitable material to all inactive
construction areas. Visible emissions shall be
limited to 20% opacity for dust emissions.
• Active Site Area: Water active site areas twice
daily or as needed to comply with Regulation
VIII.
• Storage Piles: Control dust for material
storage piles by either enclosing, covering
City of
Holtville
Prior to and during
construction/Contractor
74 | Page
and watering twice daily or as needed to
comply with Regulation VIII. Outdoor storage
of fine particulate material is prohibited.
• Hauling: All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or
other loose materials shall be covered, unless
six inches of freeboard space from the top of
the container is maintained with no spillage.
In addition, the cargo compartment of all haul
trucks is to be cleaned or washed at the
delivery site after removal of bulk material.
• Adjacent Roadways: Pave permanent roads
as quickly as possible to minimize dust.
Install wheel washers where vehicles enter
and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads or
wash off trucks and any equipment leaving
the project site. Sweep streets at the end of
the day.
• Unpaved Roads and Parking/Staging Areas:
Apply water three times daily, dust suppress
or chemically stabilize with non-toxic soils all
unpaved roads and parking. Visible emissions
shall be limited to 20% opacity.
• Speed Limit: Traffic speeds on unpaved roads
shall be limited to 5 miles per hour.
• Construction Roadways: Pave construction
roads that have a traffic volume of more than
50 daily trips. Access roads leading into the
construction site shall be paved at least 25
feet from the main road.
• Disturbed Areas: When active construction
75 | Page
ceases on the site, replace ground cover as
quickly as possible.
• Track Out or Carry Out: Track out will be
cleaned at the end of each workday or
immediately when mud or dirt extends a
cumulative distance of 50 linear feet or more
onto a paved road within an urban area.
AQ-2: Air Quality Measures: The Applicant shall
ensure the following air quality measures are shown
on applicable grading permits:
a. Construction of the project site will be subject
to the requirements of the Imperial County Air
Pollution Control Standard Mitigation
Measures for Construction Combustion
Equipment:
• Use of alternative fueled or catalyst
equipped diesel construction equipment,
including all off-road and portable dieselpowered equipment. • Minimize idling time either by shutting
equipment when not in use or reducing
the time of idling to 5 minutes as a
maximum.
• Limit, to the extent feasible, the hours of
operation of heavy-duty equipment
and/or the amount of equipment in use.
• Replace fossil fueled equipment with
electrically driven equivalents (provided
they are not run via a portable generator
set).
City of
Holtville
During
Construction/Contractor
76 | Page
• Maintain all construction equipment in
proper tune according to manufacturer’s
specifications; fuel off-road and portable
diesel powered equipment, including but
not limited to bulldozers, graders,
cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes,
generators sets, compressors, with ARB
certified motor vehicle diesel fuel.
b. To provide a greater degree of reduction of
PM10 emissions from construction
combustion equipment per Air Pollution
Control District recommendations, the project
shall curtail construction during periods of
high ambient pollutant concentrations; this
may include ceasing of construction activity
during the peak hour of vehicular traffic on
adjacent roadways.
c. The proposed project shall further implement
activity management (e.g. rescheduling
activities to reduce short-term impacts).
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1: Nesting Bird Survey:
a. To minimize avoid impacts to nesting birds in
the Project Site, the Qualified Avian Biologist
shall conduct pre-construction surveys of all
potential raptor and passerine nesting habitat
within the Project Site. The raptor survey shall
focus on potential nest sites (i.e., utility poles
and trees) within a 300-foot buffer around the
Project site. These surveys shall be
conducted no more than 14 days prior to
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Licensed
Biologist
77 | Page
ground-disturbing activities. The Qualified
Avian Biologist must be able to determine the
status and stage of nesting migratory birds
and all locally breeding passerine and raptor
species without causing intrusive
disturbance.
b. If active nests are found, within the Project
area or within 500 feet of the Project area, the
nest shall be flagged and mapped on the
construction plans and a suitable buffer based
on the species’ sensitivity to disturbance, and
as determined by the Qualified Avian Biologist
shall be established around active nests, and
no construction within the buffer shall be
allowed until the Qualified Avian Biologist has
determined that the nest is no longer active
(i.e., the nestlings have fledged and are no
longer reliant on the nest). Buffers may be
reduced at the discretion of the Qualified
Avian Biologist based on Project activity, line
of sight, tolerance of individuals, and stage of
the nest. The nest area shall be demarcated
in the field with flagging and stakes or
construction fencing. On-site construction
monitoring shall be conducted when
construction occurs in close proximately to an
active nest buffer. The buffer shall remain in
place until determined by the Qualified Avian
Biologist that the nestlings have fledged, and
the nest is no longer active. If an active nest
is encountered during the Project
construction, construction shall stop
immediately until a Qualified Avian Biologist
78 | Page
can determine (1) the status of the nest, and
(2) when work can proceed without risking
violation to state or federal laws.
BIO-2: Buffers: If active avian nest(s) are discovered
within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring
300 feet. A qualified biologist shall monitor the
nest(s) weekly after commencement of construction
to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely
affected by such activities.
City of
Holtville
Prior to and during
Construction/ Licensed
Biologist and Contractor
BIO-3: Noise Mitigation Program: During all Project
construction, the City of Holtville shall restrict use of equipment to hours least likely to disrupt wildlife
(e.g., not at night or in early morning) and restrict use of generators except for temporary use in
emergencies. Power to sites can be provided by
solar PV (photovoltaic) systems, cogeneration
systems (natural gas generator), small microhydroelectric systems, or small wind turbine systems. The City of Holtville shall ensure the use of
noise suppression devices such as mufflers or
enclosures for generators. Sounds generated from
any means must be below the 55-60 dB range within
50-feet from the source.
City of
Holtville
During
Construction/Contractor
BIO-4: Burrowing Owl: Western Burrowing Owl. If
complete avoidance cannot be achieved an CESA
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for western burrowing
owl shall be obtained prior to initiation of ground
disturbing activities. The Project proponent shall
adhere to measures and conditions set forth within
the ITP. Compensatory mitigation for direct impacts
to the species shall be fulfilled at a minimum 1:1 ratio City of
Holtville
Prior to Construction/City
of Holtville, Qualified
Biologist, CDFW, and
Contractor
79 | Page
through purchase of available western burrowing owl
conservation bank credits suitable for CESA
mitigation (if available), perpetual conservation and
management of suitable and occupied western
burrowing owl habitat of equal or better quality, or
another method as reviewed and approved by
CDFW.
a. Burrowing Owl Avoidance. If burrowing owls
are detected on-site, a Qualified Biologist,
knowledgeable of burrowing owl habitat and
behavior, shall establish a no-disturbance
buffer following the guidelines within the 2012
Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (or
most recent version) around all burrowing owl
burrows such as roosting and satellite
burrows within the Project area and an
appropriate buffer determined by the
Qualified Biologist, with posted signs
demarking the area to avoid, using stakes,
flags, and/or rope or cord to minimize the
disturbance of burrowing owl habitat. The
Qualified Biologist shall delineate burrows
with different materials than those used to
delineate the Project area, and the materials
shall not attract raptor perching. Project
proponent shall remove and properly dispose
of all materials used for delineation
immediately upon completion of the Project.
b. To ensure that the Project avoids impacts to
burrowing owl, a Qualified Biologist shall
complete a take avoidance survey no less
than 14 days prior to initiating ground
80 | Page
disturbance activities using the
recommended methods described in the 2012
Staff Report. Burrowing owls may re-colonize
a site after only a few days. Time lapses or a
break in construction activities of 3 days will
trigger subsequent take avoidance surveys
including but not limited to a final survey
conducted within 24 hours prior to ground
disturbance.
BIO-5: LSA Agreement: If project activities occur in
the Alamo River, CDFW will be notified for a
Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSA) pursuant to
Fish and Game Code section 1602.
City of
Holtville
Prior to Construction/City
of Holtville and CDFW
BIO-6: Biological Survey: Prior to Project
construction activities, a complete and recent
inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other
sensitive species located within the Project footprint
and within off-site areas with the potential to be
affected, including California Species of Special
Concern (SSC) and California Fully Protected
Species (Fish and Game Code §§ 3511, 4700, 5050,
5515), shall be completed. Species to be addressed
should include all those which meet the CEQA
definition of endangered, rare, or threatened (CEQA
Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address
seasonal variations in use of the Project area and
should not be limited to resident species. Speciesspecific surveys following protocols and guidelines, shall be completed by a Qualified Biologist and
conducted at the appropriate time of year and time
of day when the sensitive species are active or
otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Licensed
Biologist
81 | Page
species-specific survey procedures should be
developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary.
Appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation
measures shall be developed for present species in
consultation with CDFW, which may include
obtaining a CESA incidental take permit (ITP).
BIO-7: Swallow Nesting: Construction shall either
occur outside of the swallow nesting period
(generally March 15 through August 31), or the City
of Holtville shall submit to CDFW, for review and
approval, a Nesting Bird Avoidance Plan, prepared
by a Qualified Avian Biologist which could include
methods to deter swallow nesting.
City of
Holtville
Prior to and during
Construction/City of
Holtville and CDFW
BIO-8: Bat Species: Prior to the start of Project
activities, the City of Holtville shall retain a Qualified Bat Biologist to conduct a bat roosting habitat
suitability assessment of the structures, trees, and
vegetation that may be removed, altered, or
indirectly impacted by the proposed Project. Within
suitable bat roosting habitat, the Qualified Bat
Biologist shall conduct surveys to determine
presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering
(hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring
surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys
(November through January) shall be performed by
the Qualified Bat Biologist. Surveys shall be
conducted during favorable weather conditions only.
Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour
period. Visual inspections shall focus on the
identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano,
urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Licensed
Biologist
82 | Page
marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat
detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation
shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre-
dawn re-entry surveys, and to determine if night
roosting is occurring in the area. The following
actions will also be conducted as needed: • If bats are found using any trees or structures within the Project area, including the bridge
and any cliff swallow nests on the bridge, the
Qualified Bat Biologist shall identify the bats
to the species level and evaluate the colony,
if applicable, to determine its size and
significance. The bat survey results shall
include: 1) the exact location of all roosting
sites (location shall be described and
mapped); 2) the number of bats present at the
time of visit (count or estimate); 3) each
species of bat present (including how the
species was identified); 4) the location of all
signs of bats (i.e., individuals, guano, urine
staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch
marks, and bats squeaking and
chattering)(described and mapped); 5) the
type of roost: maternity roost, winter roost
(hibernacula), and night roost (resting at night
while out feeding) versus a day roost (resting
all day) must also be clearly stated; and 6)
proposed avoidance and minimization
measures, including avoidance of bats in
swallow nests. The results of the survey shall
be submitted to CDFW for review prior to
initiating Project activities.
83 | Page
• If active maternity roosts are identified in the
work area or 500 feet extending from the work
area, Project construction within these areas
shall only occur generally between October 1
and February 28, outside of the maternity
roosting season when young bats are present
but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost.
Appropriate time to start Project construction
to avoid impact shall be confirmed by a
Qualified Bat Biologist. Maternity roosts shall
not be evicted, excluded, removed, or
disturbed.
• If active hibernacula (winter roosts) are
identified in the work area or 500 feet
extending from the work area, a minimum
500-foot no-work buffer shall be provided
around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be
reduced. Project-related construction and
activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or
directly under or adjacent to hibernacula.
Buffers shall be left in place until the end of
Project construction and activities or until a
Qualified Bat Biologist determines that the
hibernacula are no longer active. Project-
related construction and activities shall not
occur between 30 minutes before sunset and
30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts
shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or
disturbed. If avoidance of a hibernacula is not
feasible, the Qualified Bat Biologist will
prepare a relocation plan to remove the
hibernacula and provide for construction of an
alternative bat roost outside of the work area.
84 | Page
A bat roost relocation plan prepared by the
Qualified Bat Biologist shall be submitted for
CDFW review and approval prior to relocation
and construction activities. The Qualified Bat
Biologist will implement the relocation plan
and new roost sites shall be in place before
the commencement of any ground-disturbing
activities that will occur within 500 feet of the
hibernacula. New roost sites shall also be in
place with sufficient timing prior to the
initiation of Project-related activities to allow
bat relocation, with the timing specified by the
Qualified Bat Biologist with consideration of
the species. Removal of roosts shall be
guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent
techniques developed by the Qualified Bat
Biologist. The City shall compensate no less
than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting
habitat with replacement and permanent
protection of roost habitat.
BIO-9: Yuma Ridgway Rail Survey: Prior to the start
of Project activities, a biologist who has a valid
10(a)(1)(A) Fish and Wildlife Service recovery permit
and a CDFW CESA Memorandum of Understanding
for Yuma Ridgway’s rail shall perform
presence/absence surveys according to the Yuma
Ridgway Rail Survey Protocol for Project Evaluation
within a 500-foot buffer of the Project. The survey
requires 6 callback surveys between March 1 and
May 15. If presence of Yuma Ridgway’s rail is
detected, Project activities that require the use of
heavy equipment shall not take place during the
species peak breeding season (generally February
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Licensed
Biologist
85 | Page
15 to September 30). CDFW shall be notified in
writing of the detection of this species within three (3) days. If protocol surveys indicate this species is not
present within the 500-foot buffer, Project activities
may proceed subject to the other provisions of
federal and state law. The results of the protocol
surveys shall be provided to CDFW prior to
commencement of Project activities.
BIO-10: Burrowing Owl Breeding and Non-breeding
Surveys: The City of Holtville shall perform breeding
and non-breeding surveys per the guidance of the
Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG,
2012), assess the impact, and create mitigation
measures to include avoidance, minimization, and
mitigation for any burrowing owls identified on-site,
and these same measures be applied to any
individuals found during any take avoidance surveys.
The guidance of mitigating impacts to burrowing
owls in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation
(CDFG, 2012) shall be followed, including (a)
permanent impacts to nesting, occupied and satellite
burrows and/or burrowing owl habitat such that the
habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing
owls impacted are replaced with permanent
conservation of similar vegetation communities
(grassland, scrublands, desert, urban, and
agriculture) to provide for burrowing owl nesting,
foraging, wintering, and dispersal (i.e., during
breeding and non-breeding seasons) comparable to
or better than that of the impact area, and (b)
sufficiently large acreage, and presence of fossorial
mammals.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Licensed
Biologist
86 | Page
BIO-11: Arrow-weed Thickets: To the greatest extent
practicable, all project plans shall avoid impacts to
arrow-weed thickets. If arrow-weed thickets cannot
be avoided, the City of Holtville shall restore the
habitat to pre-project conditions, or compensatory
mitigation for direct and permanent impacts
consisting of habitat acquisition at a minimum of a
2:1 ratio. Habitat acquisition sites shall be
biologically equal or superior to existing conditions
and shall be conserved and managed in perpetuity.
City of
Holtville
Prior to and during
Construction/Contractor
BIO-12: Nighttime Lighting: During Project
construction and operations over the lifetime of the
Project, the City of Holtville shall eliminate all
nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and
avoid the use of artificial light at night during the
hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species
are most active. The City of Holtville shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast
downward and away from surrounding open-space
areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent,
and does not result in lighting trespass including
glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night
sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association
standards at https://darksky.org/). The City of
Holtville shall ensure use of LED lighting with a
correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less,
proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of
lighting that contains toxic compounds with a
qualified recycler.
City of
Holtville
Prior to and during
Construction/Contractor
BIO-13: Education Program: A Qualified Biologist
shall conduct an education program for all persons
employed or otherwise working on the Project site
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Licensed
Biologist
87 | Page
prior to performing any work on-site (Workers
Environmental Awareness Program; WEAP). The
WEAP shall consist of a presentation that includes a
discussion of the biology of the habitats and species
that may be present at the site. The WEAP shall also
include information on the distribution and habitat
needs of any special-status species that may be
present, legal protections for those species,
penalties for violations, and mitigation measures.
The WEAP shall include, but not be limited to: (1)
best practices for managing waste and reducing
activities that can lead to increased occurrences of
opportunistic species and the impacts these species
can have on wildlife in the area and (2) protected
species that have the potential to occur on the
Project site. Interpretation shall be provided for any
non-English speaking workers, and the same
instruction shall be provided for any individual prior
to their performing any work onsite.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES
CR-1: Inventory of Existing Conditions: Prior to the
repair or rehabilitation of the bridge, it is
recommended that an inventory be conducted to
determine the age of the current existing materials.
Specifically, the different elements of the bridge
should be inspected to determine if they are original
to the bridge or if they were modified/added at a later date. If individual members were replaced in-kind as
part of the maintenance of the bridge over time,
these do not need to be removed. Only materials that
altered the original design or appearance of the
bridge should be removed; however, replacement
members should be noted in the inventory for
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
88 | Page
documentation purposes.
CR-2: Historic American Engineering Record: Prior
to the repair or rehabilitation of the bridge, it is
recommended that the current condition of the
bridge be documented through HAER-like
documentation. The inventory of existing conditions
conducted prior to this task should be used to help
describe any modifications that have been made to
the bridge and identify the remaining original
portions. The HAER-like report should include a
written presentation describing the physical entity
and any appropriate engineering or architectural
elements deemed important to the historical record.
The report should provide a history of the bridge and
its association with the development of the cities of
El Centro and Holtville. The HAER-like process
includes gathering historic photographs and any
available engineering drawings, plans, and
elevations. The formal recordation of the current
configuration of the bridge includes digital
photographs keyed to an engineering map of the
bridge and a site plan to show the location of each
photograph. All information and photographs
generated by the HAER-like program should be
incorporated into a report and attachments prepared
for submittal to the City of Holtville and any
designated curation centers.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
CR-3: Removal of Non-Historic Materials: All
materials added to the bridge after its 1904
completion that altered its original appearance
should be removed if feasible. This includes the steel
truss that was added in place of the original trestle
City of
Holtville
During
Construction/Contractor
89 | Page
and the metal deck plates added to either side of the
railroad tracks. Any additional modern materials
identified during the inventory of the bridge, or due to their absence in historic photographs or drawings,
should also be removed.
CR-4: Inspection of Existing Materials for Decay and
Treatment: The historic materials remaining after
modern elements have been removed should be
inspected for decay.
City of
Holtville
After
Construction/Contractor
CR-5: Repair and Replacement of Decayed or
Damaged Materials: All original bridge members or
materials that are rejected due to decay or damage
should be repaired or replaced in-kind with
historically accurate materials to retain the bridge’s
original historic character. Historic photographs and
drawings found during historical research should be
used as guidance for the repair and in-kind
replacement of decayed or damaged materials. Any
materials to be added to the historic bridge to
facilitate the pedestrian use of the river crossing as
part of the trail project shall match, to the extent
possible, the appearance of the original materials.
The existing track should remain but could be
bordered by wood planks of sufficient height to allow
a level pedestrian passage across the bridge.
Finally, a plaque or historical marker should be
placed at the entrance to the bridge that provides a
description of the bridge’s history, providing any
historic images that reflect the history of the rail line in the growth of the area.
City of
Holtville
During
Construction/Contractor
CR-6: Project Design: Design and construction of the
Pete Mellinger Alamo River Trail and modifications
City of Prior to
90 | Page
to the historical railroad bridge must be precisely
delineated to avoid any identified historic sites.
Holtville Construction/Contractor
CR-7: Cultural Materials: The design/construction
plans shall further incorporate language that
stipulates that if buried cultural materials are
encountered during construction, work in that area
must halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate
the nature and significance of the finding.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
CR-8: Evaluation Program: If design of the trail is
unable to avoid the historic sites beyond 50 feet of
their original delineation, a cultural/historic
evaluation program to assess potential impacts
associated with the proposed project shall be
prepared prior to any construction activities and an
amendment to this Revised IS/MND shall be
prepared and recirculated if further mitigation
measures are warranted.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
CR-9: Archeologist: An archaeologist shall be
present should excavation be proposed at depths
greater than five feet.
City of
Holtville
Prior to and during
Construction/Contractor
CR-10: Discovery of Human Remains: If evidence of
human remains is discovered, construction activities
within 200 feet of the discovery shall be halted or
diverted and the Imperial County Coroner shall be
notified (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety
Code). If the Coroner determines that the remains
are Native American, the Coroner will notify the
NAHC which will designate a Most Likely
Descendant (MLD) for the project (Section 5097.98
of the Public Resources Code). The designated MLD
will be given 48 hours from the time access to the
NAHC,
Imperial
County
Coroner, and
Imperial
County
Department of
Planning and
Development
Services.
During construction
91 | Page
property is granted to make recommendations
concerning treatment of the remains (AB 2641). If
the landowner does not agree with
recommendations of MLD, the NAHC can mediate
(Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code).
This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center, using
an open space or conservation zoning designation
or easement; or recording a document with the
county in which the property is located (AB 2641).
6. ENERGY
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
GEO-1: A site-specific geotechnical investigation
shall be prepared on an as needed basis for the
project and said geotechnical report shall be
implemented and shown on applicable grading and
building plans as details, notes or as otherwise
appropriate.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
GEO-2: State Building Code: The proposed project
is located near active faults; therefore, the proposed
bridge repairs and improvements shall be made in
accordance with the California State Building Code
(Title 24 of the California Administrative Code),
which contains specifications to minimize adverse
effects due to ground shaking from earthquakes and
liquefaction.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
GEO-3: State Water Resources Control Board
Permit: The Contractor shall comply with the
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
92 | Page
regulatory requirements of the State Water
Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) Order No.
2009-0009 DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No.
CAS000002 for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff
Associated with Construction Activity, copies of
which are available on SWRCB website at
http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwtr/construction.html.
GEO-4: Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: The
City, or its authorized representative, shall require
the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan by a qualified preparer and shall
coordinate the Notice of Intent and appropriate
annual fees to the State Water Resources Control
Board.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
GEO-5: Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
Practitioner: The Contractor shall be responsible for
implementation of the SWPPP and shall have a
qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) available on
site and be responsible for implementation of all Best
Management Practices.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
The proposed project would not result in significant
93 | Page
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
11. LAND USE AND PLANNING
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
12. MINERAL RESOURCES
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
13. NOISE
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
14. POPULATION AND HOUSING
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
16. RECREATION
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
TRANSP-1: Department of Transportation
Hauling/Traffic Permit: Prior to the start of any
construction activities, the City shall acquire a permit City of
Holtville
Prior to Construction/City
of Holtville
94 | Page
from the Department of Transportation to operate or
move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special
mobile equipment, of a size or weight of vehicle or
load exceeding the maximum limitations specified in
the California Vehicle Code, on State Route 115 or
any other facility under the jurisdiction of the
Department of Transportation.
TRANSP-2: Department of Transportation
Encroachment Permit: Should any work within the
Department of Transportation Right-of Way be
required for the project, the City shall acquire an
encroachment permit from the Department of
Transportation prior to the start of construction
activities within their Right-of-Way.
City of
Holtville
Prior to Construction/City
of Holtville
TRANSP-3: Perpetuation of Monuments: Per
Business and Profession Code 8771, perpetuation of
survey monuments shall be carried out by a licensed
land surveyor should any existing monuments be
destroyed by construction activities related to the
project.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
Construction/Contractor
18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
would be required.
20. WILDFIRE
The proposed project would not result in significant
adverse impacts related to aesthetics. No mitigation
95 | Page
would be required.
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
MFS-1: The proposed project could have the
potential to significantly impact the environment
because it has the potential to impact wildlife and
cultural resources during construction, however,
mitigation measures BIO 1-4 and CR 1-10 have
been put in place that would reduce the impacts to
less than significant.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
construction/Project
contractor
MFS-2: The proposed project does have the
potential to adversely affect humans via air quality
during construction. Therefore, mitigation measures
AQ 1 and AQ 2 will be implemented to reduce the
impacts to be less than significant.
City of
Holtville
Prior to
construction/Project
contractor
Federal Transportation Project Funding (2025’04)
City of Holtville
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED: April 24, 2025
FROM: Nick Wells, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approving Staff recommendations to Submit Selected Projects for Federal Highway Administration Funding:
- Cedar Avenue Improvements from Fourth to Fifth Street Under the Surface Transportation Block (STBG) Program
- Melon Avenue Drainage & Sidewalk Improvements from Eighth to Ninth Street under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Program ISSUE:
Shall the City Council take action to follow staff recommendations to submit the Cedar Avenue and Melon Avenue Improvements projects for federal funding through the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)?
DISCUSSION:
For several years, Imperial County agencies have worked through the Imperial County Transportation Committee to divide up funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to support streets projects in the various jurisdictions. In recent years, Holtville has funded projects along Sixth and Ninth Streets, as well as the Orchard Road from the bridge to Fourth Street through this mechanism.
Although that funding has always passed through SCAG, a recent FHWA policy change has made SCAG the more central entity for project selection. Additionally, a more strict adherence to the standard that funds are to be used on major transportation sections was announced. A recent Call for Projects delineated a May 16 deadline for submission.
Staff had identified and Council had concurred that the Cedar Avenue section from Fourth to Fifth was the next logical STBG project several years ago. It had been intended to be included with the Orchard Road project, but funds were limited, so that project was truncated.
Staff recently identified potential improvements to the Melon Road shoulder to assist in myriad problems with drainage, especially in large storm events. Sidewalk projects are typically a good destination for CMAQ funds.
Given the short turnaround time to apply, the past discussion of these projects as priorities and lack of any immediate alternate eligible projects, the City Manager directed The Holt Group to begin work on the application for these two projects for submission to SCAG. Preparation of the submittal packets requires a significant amount of research and estimation, so that process had to be and was set in motion. Staff is asking for concurrence from City Council, though more formal action is necessary prior to submission.
Transportation Project Submissions
April 28, 2025
These projects are presented in the attached table as a part of the first rudimentary listing of potential Capital Improvements projects – a topic to be discussed in depth in the near future.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time. Prior to submittal, a resolution will need to be presented to commit Transportation funds for the 11.47% required match if the projects are awarded.
ALTERNATIVES
1) Authorize the two projects as the City’s submissions for FHWA funding. 2) Direct staff to derive other projects.
3) Choose not to pursue any projects at this time.
4) Give staff alternate direction.
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION:
The City Manager recommends that the two listed projects be approved for submission.
CITY OF HOLTVILLE - Capital Improvements Projects
ID'd Projected Funded Design
Project / Task Need Cost Amount Phase Contractor Procurement Notes 2007 Bonds Mar'23 Engage Architect Feb'22 Presentation to split construction ARPA Funds?
City Hall Reconstruction /
Relocation
Energy Efficiency Mar'25 Project proposed by SitelogiQ
Retrofit
State Parks $1.2 million TBD Mar'23 RFP Issued for Design Apr'25 Design 95% Complete Court Judgement $655,588
Trail Extension to Ongoing Feb'24 Working with River Partners on Trail Mar'23 Awaiting Wetlands construction to Wetlands Concepts & Design procure funding
Dog Park TBD TBD Project requested by City Council
Existing Trail TBD TBD Mar'23 Staff discussing Trail upgrades to Improvements potentially roll into extension project
Lighting for Mac Park Discussed by Little League since
Field # 2 field construction
Ninth Street Sidewalk STBG 88.53% $640,000 2023 Constr 2023-24 Apr'22 Project selected for funding & Pavement Imprv LTA 11.47% $82,919 TBD RE/CM 2023-24
(Olive to Melon)
Cedar Avenue 2015 Identified as needing extensive
Reconstruction 2015 $750,000 STBG (?) repair - excluded from Citywide proj (Fourth to Fifth) Apr'25 Slated for STBG request
Melon Avenue Project selected for funding
Annexation & CDBG (?) Staff working on RoW &
Improvements preliminary Design
Brentwood Ave Main Continual water breaks on current pipeline Replacement warrant replacement
Underwood Main Line
(Melon to Towland)
Fifth Street Water Main
Mesquite) lines and loop service for redundancy
Project identified to connect multiple dead end
1990s Project identified to connect multiple dead end Extension & Looping lines and loop service for redundancy 2024
Water
2014
Extension (Olive to 1990s
Funding
Source(s)
Unknown
CDBG PI Funds Nearing
Completion Apr'25 Currently in Plan Check
Parks
TBD TBD
Trestle Repair 2006 $1.2 million
Administration
Public Safety Building 2000 $15 million
2023 $15 million
2024 $1,250,000
2022 $722,919
Streets
2025'04 Page 1 of 1
City of Holtville
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED: April 25, 2025
FROM: Alex Silva, Fire Chief
PREPARED BY: Yvette Rios, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Approval of an Intergovernmental Service Agreement between ICSO ISSUE:
Should the City Council approve an Intergovernmental Service Agreement with the Imperial County Sheriff Department for incident reporting software use? DISCUSSION:
In January of 2024, the Imperial County Sheriff Department (ICSO) incorporated a new system for incident reporting from the software Pro Phoenix System. For some time now, HFD has utilized ICSO’s software for fire and medical information interfacing.
In order for HFD to continue to access the system for crucial incident reporting without burdening ICSO, the City may approve the proposed Intergovernmental Service Agreement and by effect agree to compensate ICSO for the use of the service. ICSO is requesting $1,750 annually, subject to annual adjustments.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Annual compensation of $1,750, subject to annual adjustments.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the item be approved as presented.
ALTERNATIVES:
Don’t approve the item and forgo the use of the reporting software.
Provide alternate direction.
Attachments: Intergovernmental Agreement between ICSO and HFD Cordially Submitted,
Alex Silva
Fire Chief
Meeting Date 04/28/25
Item Number 3 c
Approvals . City Manager
Finance
City Attorney
City of Holtville
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED: April 28, 2025
FROM: Yvette Rios, City Clerk
SUBJECT: TextMyGov messages
ISSUE:
Shall the City Council purchase Additional Text Messages from TextMyGov? DISCUSSION:
On September 11, 2024, the City entered a one-year agreement with TextMyGov for text messaging services between the City and its residents which included 50,000 text messages per year. On October 9, 2024, the City officially launched this service to its residents.
Current update:
1,065 cellular devices are opted-in to receive text messages. 46,209 text messages have been sent.
3,791 text messages remain
The current one-year agreement will end on September 10, 2025, if not renewed. Ms. Rios will bring the matter of renewal before the Council at a later date. If their decision is to renew the agreement, 50,000 more text messages will be available. Additionally, options will be presented for a higher annual allotment of text messages in evaluation of the status of the present year.
More annual text messages will have an impact on the annual recurring fee.
As for the current issue of low messages remaining, there are set rates for purchasing additional text messages in the agreement: $750 for 100,000, $550 for 50,000, and $300 for 25,000. Any unused messages at the end of the billing cycle will roll over if the agreement is renewed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Potentially low-fiscal impact.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The City Clerk recommends that additional text messages be purchased to avoid service disruption for the remainder of the billing period.
ALTERNATIVES:
Not to authorize.
Respectfully Submitted,
Yvette Rios
City Clerk
Meeting Date 04/28/25
Item Number 3 d
Approvals
. City Manager
Finance
City Attorney
1 City Council/CM Reports (04-28’25)
City of Holtville
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED: April 24, 2025
FROM: Nick Wells, City Manager
SUBJECT: City Manager Update
INFORMATION ONLY – NO ACTION REQUIRED AT THIS TIME
ADMINISTRATION
Public Safety Lot/New Construction – Rubio Medina of Irvine, California was engaged in April, 2023, to perform Architecture services to design Phase I (Fire Apparatus Bay) and Phase II (PS Administration & Fire Dormitories) of this project. Staff met with Mr. Medina multiple times in early May, wherein iterative documents were discussed and revised. Pursuant to discussions between Council, Chief Silva, the CM and Mr. Medina regarding configuration, direction solidified for constructing a 3-bay apparatus section and a 2- story administration/residence area. Further discussion also clarified the placement of the building on the site and the external motif of the building. Mr. Medina moved forward with subconsultants for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, etc. Due to an increase in the size of the project over that which was called out in the RFP, the architect has approached the City about augmented funding, which may be brought to Council in the future. More solid delineation of cost estimates for the phasing of the project were presented in August and presented to Council for consideration. A status update meeting with Mr. Medina was held via Zoom in late January. Chief Silva and the CM got an update, wherein Medina estimated submission of plans for first plan check to be middle to late February. Chief Silva has continued to meet virtually with the architect and subconsultants on various issues over the past few weeks. The full set of drawings have been submitted to the plan check firm. This process is expected to be iterative with the architect, with multiple redlines and resubmissions, however, staff expects the entire process to be less than 60 days.
Staff met with representatives of USDA Rural Development in late 2024 to discuss financing the remaining unfunded portion of the project. Unfortunately, although their website notes capability of disadvantaged communities with populations under 12,000 to apply for 50% grant, 50% loan funding, that program is capped at $50,000 for grants, so any hope that grant funding may be available is not there. Rates were adjusted on October 1, from 4% down to 3.75%, so the loan payment calculation improved, but not drastically.
Multiple conversations regarding augmented funding have taken place with staff, Council, and various entities. The CM compiled information from various sources and submitted an application for directed Congressional funding to Raul Ruiz’s office in early May. The City received word that the project was selected by the Congressman and recommended to the Congressional budget committee. Although we were notified in March that the Congressman’s projects were not funded, his office subsequently informed staff that the project will be resubmitted in the next round of funding. Staff will continue to work with the Congressman’s office in hopes that the funding will be secured in the coming fiscal year.
The CM and Mayor Goodsell flew to Sacramento this week in association with a League of Cities event and have had an opportunity to meet with our state legislators regarding directed funding for the project. We were also able to dovetail into ongoing conversations between ICSO and these representatives for funding their own Imperial County project. Budget funding will be tight, due to state shortfalls, but this work, along with assistance from CrisCom, put the City in a very favorable position to capture any potential windfalls.
Meeting Date 04/28/25
Item Number 5 a
Approvals .
City Manager
Finance
City Attorney
2 City Council/CM Reports (04-28’25)
Staff continues to pursue additional funding sources. At the 2024 League of Cities Annual Conference, Mayor Anderson, Councilman Goodsell and the CM had multiple conversations with firms and organizations that show promise as potential funding sources. One salient proposal was received on which Council requested further research. A representative of that firm met with staff onsite in January, then spoke with Council at the meeting that evening. The firm, CrisCom Company, was engaged in February to represent the City in pursuing funding. A two-year agreement was approved. We are working to set a kickoff meeting in the next few weeks to identify priorities of the City.
Annual Financial Audit – the City’s auditors from Moss, Levy, and Hartzheim were onsite recently. The CM has once again had to set aside most other tasks over the past few weeks to prepare for and subsequently respond to issues with the audit, functioning as the lead on this required activity. Some deficiencies in finance activities were discovered in the process that have required further subsequent work. The CM has continued to function nearly exclusively to rectify these issues over the past month. Almost all information has now been forwarded and the auditors will be back onsite in May to complete testing.
PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
Citywide Pavement Maintenance Project – a Streets Assessment report was prepared by the City Engineer in early 2024 reporting the general condition of the over 16 miles of streets maintained by the City.
Nearly the entire system is in good condition, requiring maintenance rather than rehabilitation or reconstruction. A recommendation has been made to perform crack sealing and slurry coat to the bulk of the system to prolong life of the system and forestall major work to a future date. At the July Council meeting, direction was given to proceed with preparation of specifications for the project. In October, Council approved moving the project forward with advertisement for construction bidding. Bids were received in early December and the low bidder, American Asphalt South, was approved by Council. A pre-construction meeting was held in late January. Crack sealing work began first in late January, then slurry seal work was done throughout March. Striping began on 3/31 and is now complete. Staff has received many compliments on the state of the Holtville street system! The project will be closed out over the coming weeks.
Pear Canal Undergrounding/Ninth Street Improvements (Olive to Melon) – Initial action to proceed with this project was taken in early 2021. A deposit was forwarded to IID to begin design and multiple site visits with staff, the IID and City Engineer took place to discuss issues that needed to be addressed in design.
Undergrounding work was scheduled to take place in December 2021, however, delays were discussed in those meetings from the IID side which eventually led to construction work being pushed back.
IID had procured Congressional funding for the project that the City was asked to administer. Late in the process, it was relayed to staff that by taking on administration of the funding, the City would now be responsible for paying the 11.47% matching funds necessary for the grant, which could be in the neighborhood of $100k. Nevertheless, an agreement was approved with IID to administer the funding in October. The closing financial paperwork with Caltrans remains. The CM met with IID in early March to discuss their upcoming billing for the work done on the project and what amount would be left for the City to recoup for our expenditures. It is evident that IID came in under the construction estimate and there is opportunity for the City to recoup the bulk of its cash outlay for the project.
The City was awarded funding through ICTC for the resulting necessary sidewalk and roadway improvements early in the process. LC Engineering was awarded the contract for design in February, 2024.
Delays with the undergrounding project pushed back the start of the sidewalk project, necessitating a time extension. A web conference was held in September to clarify the need to move a portion of the funding for the street project into the current fiscal year. With the undergrounding project complete, staff will prepare an RFP to begin the construction of the curb, gutter and sidewalk, along with the minor pavement necessary to 3 City Council/CM Reports (04-28’25)
widen the roadway. Staff began discussion with the City Engineer in January to develop the RFP for this project to be released in March, however, we are currently awaiting clearance to proceed from Caltrans.
Pine Avenue Sidewalks – Subsequent to the awards of funding for streets projects utilizing Federal Highways dollars through ICTC in early 2022, another year of projects was quickly requested to be added.
Holtville submitted a project to capture CMAQ dollars to add sidewalks to either side of Pine Avenue between Fourth and Fifth Streets. Action to approve was taken in October, 2023. Staff began discussion with the City Engineer in March to develop a Design RFP for this project for release in in April.
Capital Improvements Project Listing – a meeting was held in November, 2023, with staff, including the City Manager, City Engineer, City Planner and Water/Wastewater Lead Operator to discuss long term capital improvements needed in the City. Water system improvements, sewer system upgrades, streets projects and other issues were discussed and expected to be further explored. A more complete detailing of the discussion will be presented to the Council in the near future. Council has requested that this issue be moved up in the queue and this be addressed shortly. Staff reinitialized discussions and has some preliminary information on the current agenda.
PARKS
Railroad Trestle Repair – A grant was secured from the California Natural Resources Agency to repair the railroad trestle burned in a river bottom fire several years ago. This is necessary to connect the Trail to east side of the river and eventually the future Wetlands area. After over a decade and a half of being somewhat unsightly and unusable, the trestle will soon be fixed cosmetically and usable for pedestrian and non-motorized traffic. Documentation was finally signed for this grant in late October, 2021. The City Engineer completed the technical specification for the Scope of Work in June 2022 for the RFP. A decision was made to forestall the bid process a bit to allow construction costs to stabilize. Eventually, Kleinfelder, Inc., was selected for Design services in April. A meeting with the design team was held in early May wherein various facets of the project were discussed. Multiple ideas to control costs and stretch the project dollars were decided upon. The decision was made to proceed with the general direction of keeping the original character of the structure, while making concessions to keep costs under control.
A January update meeting between the Design team, the City Planner and the CM revealed that the project had stalled due to a needed topographical study that the consultant thought the City would provide. After discussion, Kleinfelder engaged a local consultant to produce the document and the project is back in motion.
Pursuant to a periodic plan check, reprioritization of the elements to be completed vis a vis available funding was amended in May. Kleinfelder provided 90% plans in late September, so this phase nears completion.
Included in that plan set were construction estimates. After some analysis, staff will be bringing this to Council to approve advertising and bidding. THG reviewed the plans and sent them back to Kleinfelder for clarification and/or correction. The revised plans were resubmitted and further comments were sent back by THG. 95% plans were received on Monday, 2/10, with some minor adjustments still needed. Staff is currently working to procure the final environmental and cultural clearances so that the project can go to bid, likely within the next month.
Holtville East Trail Link - The City Manager had multiple discussions in recent years about a Trail extension from the Trestle to the Country Club area, then to the UC Research station and eventually to Hwy 111 for easier access to IVC with active transportation funding options. The idea has been well received by SCAG staff and the head of County Public Works. An application for Active Transportation funding was developed in mid-2024 and a grant application was submitted in June to fund design of the project.
Mellinger Alamo River Trail - A grant was awarded in early 2024 to River Partners, a non-profit that deals in habitat restoration, for a project that would include a Wetlands trail spur. RP met with the City Manager and toured the site, then engaged Nicklaus Engineering to design the project. Staff was contacted by NEI in March to discuss design elements. River Partners staff continued to meet with the CM throughout 4 City Council/CM Reports (04-28’25)
the Spring and early Summer, performing a few physical “scouting” trips to decide the best path for the trail extension. They have done some preliminary exploration and soil sampling and continue to move the project forward. A tentative map was forwarded to the City this week. The original template is aggressive (i.e. “Expensive”), so it is assumed that discussions and concessions will be forthcoming. River Partners presented a slightly revised plan to the Council in early October to get feedback on the direction of the project. Staff met virtually with River Partners in mid-December, with some minor adjustments to the plans discussed. A regrouping meeting was held in February – we are awaiting a few studies to proceed with the next steps in finalizing design and procuring funding. The City has been working with the Institute for Local Government on support for various projects, so they met with RP in early March to eventually assist with procuring construction grants when the time arises. A progress meeting this week revealed that a cultural resources report is being produced, after which project costing will continue and scoping can be discussed.
BUILDING DEPT - The City has issued 29 building permits in 2025. A list of permits issued by month is available on the City’s website at https://www.holtville.ca.gov/building-planning/building-and-planning/buildingdepartment/ Melon, LLC Housing Project (± 50) – A project has been in the works for some time at the northeast corner of Ninth and Melon, just outside the City limits. After years of confusion regarding the process, the project’s ownership group, led by John Hawk, engaged Development Design & Engineering in 2016 to assist in moving the project along. DD&E completed CEQA compliance, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council in late 2020.
The project was presented at the Planning Commission in October 2020 and drew a good deal of public opposition. PC action pushed the project forward with a designation of allowing R-1 or R-2 development, with Council accepting the PC recommendation in November, 2020. The denser R-2 zoning designation would allow up to 8 units per acre or approximately 65 units. The annexation was approved by LAFCo in February, 2021. We await further submission from the project proponent.
Staff spoke with Mr. Hawk multiple times to remind him that there are still several requirements to move his project forward, which he could be doing concurrently with the preparation and construction of the IID and City improvements. He said he will be speaking to his partners. As the undergrounding and street work are imminent, he still needs to produce a site plan, building plans, pull permits, etc. The City’s project should now have no bearing on his timeline. This was reiterated to Mr. Hawk again in January and again in July.
The CM spoke with Mr. Hawk today and he conveyed a desire to sell the project, which is now listed for sale.
AMG Sunset Rose Senior Apartments (± 33) – In July, 2022, the City was granted HOME funding for this AMG & Associates apartment project, proposed in the area of Third and Grape. This will create some longterm oversight by the City, but it does continue to add housing. A subdivision map was approved for the property. A consultant to administer this grant was engaged in May, 2022, and an application for additional subsidized financing was approved by the City in late November.
A pre-submittal meeting was held in early November to discuss necessary aspects to the construction with the project proponent, including offsite improvements. Much of the discussion centered on handling stormwater. Final map and the necessary proposed lot split were approved in late February as well. Since the closing of the financing, several paperwork/compliance issues cropped up that the City was left to work on.
This was not the “deal” as originally presented, so staff sought assistance. Staff met with HCD representatives on this project in October. We are hoping they will assist in working with the contractor to get the project running more smoothly.
Start was delayed as construction bids came in significantly over projections. The developer had made a drawdown on funding, however, the ownership group has been somewhat unresponsive as the project sat in limbo for some time. An extension on their CUP was requested and was granted by Planning Commission 5 City Council/CM Reports (04-28’25)
in May, 2024, then a pre-construction meeting with the developer and City was finally held in January.
Construction is in progress, which the Building Inspector is overseeing.
AMG Pine Crossing Apartments (± 64) – This is a proposed mirror image project across from Fern Crossing complex. The Building Inspector and City Engineer have coordinated with a plan check firm on the plans that were first submitted in June. After a few iterations and resubmissions, the building plans were approved in early October. AMG is still working with The City Engineer and staff on finalizing all site work and off-site plans for utilities and stormwater handling. Dirt work on the project has begun. Staff met with the City Engineer to discuss issues with handling of stormwater for the property multiple times. A property boundary issue has surfaced with the lot to the north that will require examination. A phone conference was held with the developer and staff and discuss some issues regarding requirements of the City, then the CM met with the Construction superintendent multiple times in March to finalize City requirements. The design engineer has resubmitted plans for a contested water line and grading is expected to begin next week..
Peri & Sons Ag Labor Housing (66) – this project was introduced to Planning Commission earlier this week. It proposes to construct USDA-approved dormitory style housing for up to 660 H2A Visa Program agriculture laborers working for the applicant firm. PC approved the site plan and density waiver contingent on City Council approval of the land use designation and Conditional Use Permit. A Public Hearing was held at a subsequent City Council meeting and the project was approved. We will now await more definitive site plans and building design for review.
WATER ENTERPRISE
Rate Study – The profitability of the Water Enterprise has been problematic in recent years. Coupled with the debt covenant to budget a net revenue of 120% of the annual debt service, a rate adjustment has been explored. A formal Water Rate Study must be completed, which will be brought back for discussion at some point in the future.
MEETINGS & EVENTS RECENTLY ATTENDED :
∙ 04/14/25 Department Head Meeting City Hall
∙ 04/14/25 Cal-Cities SD Division Virtual Meeting Web Conference ∙ 04/18/25 IID 2-on-2 Meeting (Unable to Attend) IID Headquarters (Imperial) ∙ 04/18/25 Good Friday Observed (City Hall Closed) City Hall ∙ 04/20/25 Easter Sunday
∙ 04/21/25 Sick Day (Out of Office) City Hall
∙ 04/22/25 Alamo River Trail (Wetlands Spur) Check-in Meeting Web Conference ∙ 04/23 - 25/2025 CLoC City Leaders Summit Sacramento, CA ∙ 04/23/25 Meeting w/ CrisCom Consultants Sacramento, CA ∙ 04/23/25 Meeting w/ Assemblyman Jeff Gonzalez Legislature Offices (Sacramento) ∙ 04/23/25 Meeting w/ Senator Padilla Staff Legislature Offices (Sacramento) ∙ 04/23/25 Dinner w/ ICSO/CrisCom Staff & Assm Gonzalez Hyatt Regency (Sacramento) UPCOMING EVENTS :
∙ 04/28/25 Department Head Meeting City Hall
∙ 04/28/25 Holtville City Council Meeting City Hall
∙ 04/28/25 Demo w/ Potential Vendor re: Video Monitoring Web Meeting ∙ 04/29/25 IVEDC Executive Committee Meeting Web Conference ∙ 05/01 - 05/02/25 SCAG Regional Conference & General Assembly JW Marriott (Palm Desert, CA) ∙ 05/02/25 Holtville Rotary Club Luncheon St. Paul's Lutheran Church ∙ 05/05/25 Department Head Meeting City Hall
∙ 05/06/25 BOOST Assistance Check-in Web Conference
∙ 05/09/25 Holtville Rotary Club Luncheon St. Paul's Lutheran Church ∙ 05/12/25 Department Head Meeting City Hall
∙ 05/14/25 ICTC Management/CCMA Meetings ICTC Offices (EC) ∙ 05/15/25 Holtville Farmers Market & Street Fair Holt Park ∙ 05/19/25 Cal-Cities Riverside/Imperial Joint Division Meeting Fantasy Springs Casino (Indio) ∙ 05/19/25 Holtville Planning Commission Meeting City Hall ∙ 05/20/25 BOOST Assistance Check-in Web Conference
∙ 05/21/25 IV Foreign Trade Zone Meeting IC Business Center (EC) ∙ 05-22-23/2025 MLH Auditors Onsite
∙ 05/22/25 Holtville Farmers Market & Street Fair Holt Park ∙ 05/27/25 Alamo River Trail (Wetlands Spur) Check-in Meeting Web Conference ∙ 10/08 - 10/10/25 CA League of Cities Annual Conference Long Beach, CA ∙
If you have any questions about any of the items presented, please feel free to contact me directly.
Respectfully submitted,
Nicholas D. Wells, City Manager 6
City Council/CM Reports (2025'04-28)
City of Holtville
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED: April 23, 2025
FROM: Chandler Sinclair, Finance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Finance Department Update
INFORMATION ONLY – NO ACTION REQUIRED AT THIS TIME
Mid-Year Financial Update
The purpose of the following information is to address the financial health of the City of Holtville’s Enterprise Funds as of Q3 FY2025 (as of March 2025).
The Finance Department has examined and evaluated the Enterprise Funds - Water, Sewer, and Trash - making necessary adjustments to ensure all revenues and expenditures have been properly recorded with efforts to establish increased knowledge of current financial standing and to better generate future projections and proposals.
The following report includes a comparison of actual performance against budgeted figures as well as the Year-over-Year (YoY) figures. This report serves as a comprehensive overview of the City’s Enterprise Funds as of Q3 FY2025, which shows areas where the City has outperformed expectations and shows areas that may require improvement. In addition, there are some levels of explanation included for the anomalies observed.
This evaluation will enable the City to frame actionable strategies for the future.
Acct. Description Budget Thru March Y/E Actual % of Bgt Budget Thru March % of Bgt Projected % of Proj Revenue from Use of Money 1,250 19,351 19,351 1548.1% 17,500 - 0.0% 8,750 0.0% 0.0% Total Current Services 1,511,500 1,055,104 1,404,446 69.8% 1,509,000 1,133,707 75.1% 1,514,966 74.8% 7.4% Total Other Revenue 56,500 38,878 55,563 68.8% 53,000 49,551 93.5% 70,189 70.6% 27.5% TOTAL REVENUE 1,569,250 1,113,333 1,479,360 70.9% 1,579,500 1,183,258 74.9% 1,593,905 74.2% 6.3% Salaries & Wages 302,729 196,032 254,442 64.8% 281,437 196,859 69.9% 254,837 77.2% 0.4% Fringe Benefits 122,849 70,105 86,991 57.1% 110,899 55,637 50.2% 72,598 76.6% -20.6% Personal Expenses 17,700 13,342 19,239 75.4% 17,575 10,489 59.7% 14,037 74.7% -21.4% Materials, Supplies & Services 413,825 386,492 607,336 93.4% 602,850 398,169 66.0% 605,362 65.8% 3.0% Data Processing 17,420 13,451 17,479 77.2% 19,385 7,821 40.3% 10,197 76.7% -41.9% Debt Service 195,934 195,175 195,175 99.6% 194,906 194,221 99.6% 194,221 100.0% -0.5% Capital Imrpovements 291,833 44,311 122,013 15.2% 296,833 130,678 44.0% 196,480 66.5% 194.9% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,362,290 918,908 1,302,675 67.5% 1,523,885 993,874 65.2% 1,347,732 73.7% 8.2% Net Revenue over Expenditures 206,960 194,425 176,685 55,615 189,384 246,173 -2.6%
EXPENDITURES
2023-24 2024-25 YoY
Change
WATER ENTERPRISE
REVENUE
[WATER ENTERPRISE]
Revenues
- Revenue Budget for FY2025 is estimated at $1.580M.
- Revenues as of Q3 FY2025 are estimated at $1.183M.
- Projected Revenues for FY2025 are estimated at $1.593M.
Therefore, projected revenues are roughly $14.4K more than budgeted revenues.
YoY Change - Revenue
- Revenue from Use of Money shows a decrease YoY ($19.4K), which is due to missing interest revenue as a result of past due bank reconciliations. This can be reconciled before Y/E. - Overall, TOTAL REVENUES show an increase of 6.3% YoY ($69.9K). Revenues for FY2025 should increase even more once interest revenue has been accounted for and recorded. [WATER ENTERPRISE]
Expenditures
- Expenditures Budget for FY2025 is estimated at $1.524M. - Expenditures as of Q3 FY2025 are estimated at $993.8K. - Projected Expenditures for FY2025 are estimated at $1.348M.
Therefore, projected expenditures are roughly $74.9K over budgeted expenditures.
YoY Change - Expenditures
- Materials, Supplies & Services expense show an increase of 3.0% YoY ($11.6K). This is due to an increase in money spent under GL account-44201 Filtration and Treatment Supplies as well as an increase in the price of the chemicals purchased. - Capital Improvements expense show an increase of 194.9% YoY ($86.4K). $85.3K or 98% of this change is due to a transfer of funds to the USDA Short Lived Asset account, which was not completed for FY2024. Omitting this anomaly from the equation will show a much smaller increase of 2.3% YoY, which is due to water meter replacement costs. - Overall, TOTAL EXPENDITURES show an increase of 8.2% YoY ($74.9K).
NET INCOME
- The Net Income (NI) as of Q3 FY2025 for the Water Enterprise is $189.3K, but it does show a decrease of 2.6% YoY ($5.0K).
- The City of Holtville’s Water Enterprise projections show that revenues should outweigh the expenditures by approximately $246.2K for the end of FY2025.
Acct. Description Budget Thru March Y/E Actual % of Bgt Budget Thru March % of Bgt Projected % of Proj Revenue from Use of Money 1,250 19,351 19,351 1548.1% 17,500 - 0.0% 8,750 0.0% 0.0% Total Current Services 1,511,500 1,055,104 1,404,446 69.8% 1,509,000 1,133,707 75.1% 1,514,966 74.8% 7.4% Total Other Revenue 56,500 38,878 55,563 68.8% 53,000 49,551 93.5% 70,189 70.6% 27.5% TOTAL REVENUE 1,569,250 1,113,333 1,479,360 70.9% 1,579,500 1,183,258 74.9% 1,593,905 74.2% 6.3% Salaries & Wages 302,729 196,032 254,442 64.8% 281,437 196,859 69.9% 254,837 77.2% 0.4% Fringe Benefits 122,849 70,105 86,991 57.1% 110,899 55,637 50.2% 72,598 76.6% -20.6% Personal Expenses 17,700 13,342 19,239 75.4% 17,575 10,489 59.7% 14,037 74.7% -21.4% Materials, Supplies & Services 413,825 386,492 607,336 93.4% 602,850 504,053 83.6% 711,247 70.9% 30.4% Data Processing 17,420 13,451 17,479 77.2% 19,385 7,821 40.3% 10,197 76.7% -41.9% Debt Service 195,934 195,175 195,175 99.6% 194,906 194,221 99.6% 194,221 100.0% -0.5% Capital Imrpovements 291,833 44,311 122,013 15.2% 296,833 130,678 44.0% 196,480 66.5% 194.9% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,362,290 918,908 1,302,675 67.5% 1,523,885 1,099,758 72.2% 1,453,617 75.7% 19.7% Net Revenue over Expenditures 206,960 194,425 176,685 55,615 83,500 140,288 -57.1%
EXPENDITURES
2023-24 2024-25 YoY
Change
WATER ENTERPRISE w.Projects
REVENUE
[WATER ENTERPRISE w.Projects]
Throughout FY2025, there were few expenditures that were accrued specifically in relation to a special project - either the Tank Rehab [11.31560] (recoating of the water tank) or the Underwood Project [11.80051]. The following information outlines the Water Enterprise with the inclusion of these special projects. The table on the previous page shows any effects these expenditures had on the water enterprise highlighted in blue.
Revenues
No changes in Revenues.
Expenditures
- The only Expenditure category that was affected was Materials, Supplies & Services. There was a total of $105.8K expenses accrued by both projects collectively. This change makes the total category show an increase of 30.4% YoY.
NET INCOME
- The Net Income (NI) as of Q3 FY2025 for the Water Enterprise with these projects included is $83.5K and shows a decrease of 57.1% YoY ($110.9K).
- The effect of the expenses accrued through executing these special projects will have little impact on the Total Net Income and shows a projection of approximately $140K Net Income for the City’s Water Enterprise for the end of FY2025.
Acct. Description Budget Thru March Y/E Actual % of Bgt Budget Thru March % of Bgt Projected % of Proj Revenue from Use of Money 11,500 66,830 40,226 581.1% 11,500 - 0.0% 5,750 0.0% 0.0% Total Current Services 1,501,500 1,264,705 1,737,436 84.2% 1,632,000 1,254,840 76.9% 1,715,444 73.1% -0.8% TOTAL REVENUE 1,513,000 1,331,535 1,777,662 88.0% 1,643,500 1,254,840 76.4% 1,721,194 72.9% -5.8% Salaries & Wages 423,411 275,915 354,096 65.2% 303,861 279,499 92.0% 345,096 81.0% 1.3% Fringe Benefits 155,167 93,815 118,570 60.5% 120,470 80,057 66.5% 102,847 77.8% -14.7% Personal Expenses 17,450 10,344 13,715 59.3% 17,350 10,147 58.5% 13,253 76.6% -1.9% Materials, Supplies & Services 301,900 221,556 312,625 73.4% 363,150 218,340 60.1% 309,383 70.6% -1.5% Data Processing 26,350 15,605 20,638 59.2% 26,350 14,684 55.7% 17,063 86.1% -5.9% Debt Service 395,889 358,334 358,334 90.5% 395,889 130,573 33.0% 359,162 36.4% -63.6% Capital Improvements 170,245 53,207 53,207 31.3% 162,500 153,513 94.5% 203,513 75.4% 188.5% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,490,412 1,028,776 1,231,185 69.0% 1,389,570 886,813 63.8% 1,350,317 65.7% -13.8% Net Revenue over Expenditures 22,588 302,759 546,477 253,930 368,027 370,877 21.6%
EXPENDITURES
2023-24 2024-25 YoY
Change
SEWER ENTERPRISE
REVENUE
[SEWER ENTERPRISE]
Revenues
- Revenue Budget for FY2025 is estimated at $1.644M.
- Revenues as of Q3 FY2025 are estimated at $1.255K.
- Projected Revenues for FY2025 are estimated at $1.721M.
Therefore, projected revenues are roughly $77.7K more than budgeted revenues.
YoY Change - Revenue
- Revenue from Use of Money shows a decrease YoY ($66.8K), which is due to missing interest revenue as a result of past due bank reconciliations. This can be reconciled before Y/E. - Overall, TOTAL REVENUES show a decrease of 5.8% YoY ($76.7K). Revenues for FY2025 are expected to increase once interest revenue has been recorded. [SEWER ENTERPRISE]
Expenditures
- Expenditures Budget for FY2025 is estimated at $1.390M. - Expenditures as of Q3 FY2025 are estimated at $886.8K. - Projected Expenditures for FY2025 are estimated at $1.350M.
Therefore, projected expenditures are roughly $116.9K over budgeted expenditures.
YoY Change - Expenditures
- Salaries & Wages expense show an increase of 1.3%, which is warranted by pay increases. - Debt Service expense shows a decrease of 63.6% YoY ($141.9K). However, there is a large expense over $200K expected in April 2025, that has not been accounted for. With that expense included, the new YoY change would still show a decrease but would only be a decrease of less than 1%.
- Capital Improvements expense shows an increase of 188.5% YoY ($7.6K). 37% of this increase was due to a submersible pump replacement ($57K) and 48% was due to a UV system replacement ($73K) that were not budgeted for.
- Overall, TOTAL EXPENDITURES show a decrease of 13.8% YoY ($141.9K). However, with the expected Debt Service expenses just over $200K, TOTAL EXPENDITUES will show an increase of 8.4% ($86.0K).
NET INCOME
- The Net Income (NI) as of Q3 FY2025 shows an increase of 21.6% YoY ($65.3K). - Once the large Debt Service expense has been accounted for, the NI will be impacted causing it to decrease YoY. However, the projected revenues still outweigh the projected expenditures, and the City of Holtville is projected to have a positive Net Income for the Sewer Enterprise of approximately $370.8K for the end of FY2025.
Acct. Description Budget Thru March Y/E Actual % of Bgt Budget Thru March % of Bgt Projected % of Proj Revenue from Use of Money 322,500 264,144 431,468 81.9% 342,500 274,536 80.2% 436,170 62.9% 3.9% TOTAL REVENUE 322,500 264,144 431,468 81.9% 342,500 274,536 80.2% 436,170 62.9% 3.9% Materials, Supplies & Services 322,500 272,221 352,058 84.4% 338,000 262,921 77.8% 192,381 136.7% -3.4% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 322,500 272,221 352,058 84.4% 338,000 262,921 77.8% 192,381 136.7% -3.4% Net Revenue over Expenditures - (8,077) 79,410 4,500 11,615 243,789
EXPENDITURES
2023-24 2024-25 YoY
Change
TRASH ENTERPRISE
REVENUE
Overall, the City of Holtville’s financial health of the Enterprise Funds as of Q3 FY2025 (as of March 2025) is in good condition. All three funds - Water, Sewer, and Trash - show a projection of positive Net Income for the end of FY2025.
Moving forward, there needs to be more diligent effort from the finance department put towards bank reconciliations to identify adequate values of interest earnings in real time. In addition, the supervisor has worked with Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable to correct journal entries and ensure revenues and expenditures are being recorded accurately, which will be a continuous occurrence of effort through the future.
The Finance Department and the City Manager will continue to go over budgets, revenues, expenditures, and more with each Department Head before the Fiscal Year End to ensure continuous positive financial health and promote conservative financial decision-making.
Please reach out to the Finance Supervisor with any questions or comments.
Respectfully submitted,
Chandler Sinclair
Finance Supervisor
City of Holtville
City of Holtville
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED: April 15, 2025
FROM: Alex Silva, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Monthly Report for March 2025
THIS IS INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
The month of March 2025, was extremely busy month. We started with our annual Red Card wild land training and certification. HFD staff had to endure multiple events on a timed course to get the certification. Our newer firefighters attended the S-130, S-190 course in El Centro, the course is the beginning portion of wild land training, shows weather conditions, tools, safety, and basic conditions. March 21, 2025 we had the pleasure of doing a fill a boot for the Burn Institute, we raised over $1300 for the organization. I partially participated in the Red Cross "Sound the Alarm" in the city, until I responded to the cardboard pallets fire West of the city. The Red Cross installed 347 smoke detectors in the city. Kudos to this great organization. March 24,25,26 2025, We participated in the annual Wild land training in the Imperial Valley, this year it was held in Brawley California. Attached is the monthly report for the month of March 2025.
Emergency Calls
Training hours
Cor�:
mitted,
Alex Silva
Fire Chief
82 274
City of Holtville
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED: April 21st, 2025
FROM: Frank Cornejo
Water/Wastewater Operations Supervisor
SUBJECT: Water / Wastewater Plant Operations & Maintenance Summary THIS IS INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
The purpose of this report is to inform council of all operations and maintenance activities carried out at the Water & Wastewater treatment facilities during the period between 04/07/2025 thru 04/21/2025.
WATER PLANT:
• Water plant staff proceeded to refill 2.4 MG tank (after second wash-down and disinfection), and hold tank level at 17 feet to check for leaks. After a 7-day holding period, no signs of leakage were present. Staff will proceed with filling to capacity, and bacteriological testing.
WASTEWATER PLANT:
• After obtaining council approval, staff have contacted EDI Inc. to coordinate replacement work of the Biolac aeration diffuser membranes (see attached photos).
Respectfully Submitted,
Frank Cornejo.
Water/Wastewater Chief Operator/Consultant
IV Water Specialists
2.4 MG Tank level held at 17 feet to check for leakage
No signs of leakage at northern base of 2.4 MG Tank
View looking south across Biolac aeration basin shows aeration diffuser chains scheduled to be replaced by EDI Inc.
April 25, 2025,
City of Holtville
REPORT TO COUNCIL
DATE ISSUED
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Public Works Supervisor
Bimonthly Report.
THIS IS INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
The purpose of this report is to inform the Council of Public Works activities since the last council meeting.
Public Works has been actively working on or completed the following:
• Cleared sewer plugs at various locations in town.
• Repaired water service line leaks.
• Worked with the Sheriff's Department to clean up graffiti at the park and around town. • Cleaning up all burnt salt cedars south of the skate park. • Picked up 5 dogs.
• Installed three 3/4-inch meters.
• Replaced 6-inch valve on Brentwood and 8
th St.
• Installed backstop wood at Samaha park.
• Setup road closure the farmers market.
• Setup closure for the car show.
..
Respectfully Submitted,
-
,. __ _ C:D
Public Works SupervisorCity of Holtville I ,