City Council Agenda June 8, 2026
1 1916506-1
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT/CALIFORNIA BROWN ACT
NOTIFICATION FOR THE CITY OF HUGHSON
This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code Section 54954.2).
Disabled or Special needs Accommodation: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting and/or if you need assistance to attend or participate in a City Council meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office at (209) 883-4054. Notification at least 48-hours prior to the meeting will assist the City Clerk in assuring that reasonable accommodations are made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
City of Hughson
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Hughson City Hall – 7018 Pine Street Hughson, California MONDAY, JUNE 8, 2026 - 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor George Carr
ROLL CALL: Mayor George Carr
Mayor Pro Tem Randy Crooker
Councilmember Julie Ann Strain
Councilmember Alan McFadon
Councilmember Susana Vasquez
AGENDA
HUGHSON CITY COUNCIL
How to participate in, or observe the Meeting:
• In person in the City Council Chambers and submit public comment when invited during the meeting. • Observe only via YouTube live, by accessing this link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-PwkdIrKoMmOJDzBSodu6A?view_as=subscriber If a technical issue arises with any streaming option, the City Council meeting will continue unless the meeting is being held pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 2449. • In addition, recorded City Council meetings are posted on the City’s website the second business day following the meeting. Recorded videos can be accessed with the following link:
Upcoming Meetings | Hughson CA
City Council Agenda June 8, 2026
2 1916506-1
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor George Carr
INVOCATION: Hughson Ministerial Association
1. PUBLIC BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR (No Action Can Be Taken):
Please limit presentations to three minutes. If you wish to speak regarding an item on the agenda, you may be asked to defer your remarks until the Council addresses the matter. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2(a)(3), no action or discussion may be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except that the City Council, or its staff, may briefly respond to comments or questions from members of the public, provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information, or direct staff to place the issue on a future agenda.
2. PRESENTATIONS: NONE
3. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted upon by a single action of the City Council unless otherwise requested by an audience member, or individual Councilmember, for special consideration. Otherwise, the recommendation of staff will be accepted and acted upon by roll call vote.
3.1: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of May 26, 2026.
3.2: Approve the Warrants.
3.3: Approve the Treasurer’s Report for the Month Ended of April 2026.
3.4: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-13, Calling and Giving Notice of the General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain City officers, and requesting that the election be consolidated with Stanislaus County in accordance with State law.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
5.1: Consider Resolution No. 2026-14, approving an Updated User Fee Schedule. (Continued from the May 26, 2026, meeting)
6. NEW BUSINESS: NONE
7. CORRESPONDENCE: NONE
8. COMMENTS:
A brief report on notable attendance at a meeting, or conference, or other notable topics of City business shall be made. The Brown Act does not allow for discussion or action of items by the City Council during this time.
City Council Agenda June 8, 2026
3 1916506-1
8.1: Staff Reports and Comments:
City Manager
Director of Finance
Community Development Director
Police Services
City Attorney
8.2: Council Comments:
9. CLOSED SESSION:
9.1: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: One (1) potential case
10. ADJOURNMENT:
The next City Council meeting is scheduled for Monday, June 22, 2026, at 6:00 pm.
In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the office of the City Clerk at Hughson City Hall during normal business hours. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on the agenda.
Notice Regarding Non-English Speakers
Pursuant to California Constitution Article III, Section IV, establishing English as the official language for the State of California, and in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedures Section 185, which requires proceedings before any State Court to be in English, notice is hereby given that all proceedings before the City of Hughson City Council shall be in English and anyone wishing to address the Council is required to have a translator present who will take an oath to make an accurate translation from any language not English into the English language.
UPCOMING EVENTS:
June 9 • Parks, Recreation & Entertainment Commission, Council Chambers, 6:00PM June 16 • Planning Commission Meeting, City Council Chambers, 6:00PM June 22 • City Council Meeting, City Council Chambers, 6:00PM
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
Date: June 5, 2026 Time: 5:00 PM
Name: Dominique Romo Title: City Manager
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.1
SECTION 3: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: June 8, 2026
Subject: Approval of the City Council Minutes
Presented By: Dominique Romo, City Manager
Approved By:
____________________________
City Manager
______________________________________________________________________________ Recommendation:
Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of May 26, 2026.
City Council Minutes May 26, 2026
1 1916506-1
City of Hughson
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Hughson City Hall – 7018 Pine Street Hughson, California TUESDAY, MAY 26, 2026 - 6:00 P.M.
Teleconference Location in accordance with Govt. Code Section 54953(b) 1503 Macdonald Ave, Suite A
Richmond CA, 94801
Suite 208
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor George Carr
ROLL CALL:
Present: Mayor George Carr
Mayor Pro Tem Randy Crooker
Councilmember Julie Ann Strain
Councilmember Alan McFadon
Councilmember Susana Vasquez (Via Teleconference Location) Staff Present: Dominique Romo, City Manager
Andy Pinasco, City Attorney
Kim Weimer, Director of Finance and Admin Services
Carla Jauregui, Community Development Director
Brock Dias, Chief of Police Services
Sanjay Prasad, Deputy with Police Services
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor George Carr
INVOCATION: Hughson Ministerial Association
MINUTES
HUGHSON CITY COUNCIL
City Council Minutes May 26, 2026
2 1916506-1
1. PUBLIC BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR (No Action Can Be Taken):
Jamie Ellak, Nama’s Kitchen, addressed the Council regarding her plans to open a café on Hughson Avenue. She requested an exemption from the grease trap requirement and mentioned plans for a small fence and outdoor seating area in front of the proposed location. She asked that these items be placed on a future Council agenda for discussion. Ms. Ellak also noted that the City of Waterford offers a small business grant program.
2. PRESENTATIONS:
2.1: Recognition of Stanislaus Sheriff’s Office Deputy Sanjay Prasad as Hughson’s Deputy of the Year.
Mayor Carr announced the item, and Chief Dias presented the award to Deputy Prasad, highlighting Deputy Prasad’s achievements and dedicated service, for which the award was earned.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR:
All items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted upon by a single action of the City Council unless otherwise requested by an audience member, or individual Councilmember, for special consideration. Otherwise, the recommendation of staff will be accepted and acted upon by roll call vote.
3.1: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 11, 2026.
3.2: Approve the Warrants.
3.3: Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2026-02, adding Chapter 2.05 to the HMC – The Code of Conduct for Elected Officials.
STRAIN/CROOKER 5-0 motion passes unanimously to approve the Consent Calendar as presented.
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
4.1: Consider and Provide Direction Regarding the Naming of the Play Area at Euclid Park in Memory of Dinella “Danee” Madrigal.
Director Jauregui presented the staff report on the item. The Council deliberated and provided feedback to the applicant, including additional options for the applicant to explore.
The item was continued to a future meeting to allow time for that review.
No Council action was taken.
City Council Minutes May 26, 2026
3 1916506-1
5. PUBLIC HEARING:
5.1: Consideration of a Continuance of the Public Hearing on a Resolution approving an Updated User Fee Schedule to the June 8, 2026, meeting.
City Manager Romo presented the item and advised that it will be brought back at the next meeting.
Mayor Carr opened the Public Hearing and adjourned the public hearing to the June 8, 2026 meeting.
No Council action was taken.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
Mayor Pro Tem Crooker assumed the Chair for Agenda items 6.1 and 6.2.
Mayor Carr was recused from participation in deliberations or voting on Agenda Items 6.1 and 6.2.
Mayor Carr moved to the gallery (audience seating).
Councilmember Vasquez confirmed recusing herself from deliberations and the vote on Agenda Items
6.1 and 6.2 based on her role as the complainant in the underlying investigation.
Mayor Pro Tem Crooker advised both recused council members that they may address the Council during public comment on Agenda Items 6.1 and 6.2 before deliberations begin.
6.1: Consideration Resolution No. 2026-11 Formally Censuring Mayor George Carr for Conduct Inconsistent with the City’s Code of Conduct for Elected Officials Mayor Pro Tem Crooker called this item and City Attorney Pinasco presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Crooker opened for Public Comment.
Mayor Carr provided public comment by reading a statement in response to Agenda Item 6.1.
Councilmember Vasquez provided public comment in response to Agenda Item 6.1 and Mayor Carr’s statement.
Mayor Pro Tem Crooker closed Public Comment.
Council deliberated on this item with the City Attorney.
City Council Minutes May 26, 2026
4 1916506-1
MCFADON/STRAIN 3-0 (VASQUEZ/CARR – Recused) motion passes unanimously to adopt Resolution No. 2026-11, formally Censuring Mayor George Carr for Conduct Inconsistent with the City’s Code of Conduct for Elected Officials.
6.2: Consideration of Resolution No. 2026-12, Appointing Replacement Members to Council Committee and Board Seats.
Mayor Pro Tem Crooker called this item and City Attorney Pinasco presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Crooker opened for Public Comment. He then closed public comment, as no comments were provided.
STRAIN/CROOKER 3-0 (VASQUEZ/CARR – Recused) motion passes to adopt Resolution No. 2026-12, Appointing Replacement Members to Council Committee and Board Seats held by Mayor Carr.
7. CORRESPONDENCE: NONE
8. COMMENTS:
A brief report on notable attendance at a meeting, or conference, or other notable topics of City business shall be made. The Brown Act does not allow for discussion or action of items by the City Council during this time.
8.1: Staff Reports and Comments:
City Manager Romo updated Council on the City applying for grant monies for water projects through Senator Marie Alvarado-Gil’s office.
8.2: Council Comments:
Councilmember McFadon updated Council on his attendance at three different Memorial Day ceremonies.
Councilmember Strain updated Council on her attendance at the Leadership Breakfast.
Mayor Carr updated Council on his attendance at the HHW event and the Memorial Day ceremonies.
City Attorney Pinasco adjourned the Council into Closed Session at 7:12 PM.
9. CLOSED SESSION:
9.1: CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Dominique Romo, City Manager Employee Organization: Operating Engineers Local Union 3
City Council Minutes May 26, 2026
5 1916506-1
The Council returned from Closed Session at 7:49 PM. All members of Council were present during the duration of the session. No reportable action was taken.
10. ADJOURNMENT:
CROOKER/STRAIN 5-0 motion passes unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 7:49 PM.
APPROVED:
______________________________
GEORGE CARR, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
DOMINIQUE ROMO, City Manager
Meeting Date: June 8, 2026
Subject: Approval of Warrants Register
Presented By: Kim Weimer, Director of Finance
Approved By: _____________________________
Dominique Romo, City Manager
Recommended Council Action:
Approve the Warrants Register as presented.
Background and Overview:
The warrants register presented to the City Council is a listing of all expenditures paid from May 19, 2026, through June 2, 2026.
Fiscal Impact:
There are reductions in various funds for payment of expenses.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.2
SECTION 3: CONSENT CALENDAR
6/2/2026 6:29:34 PM Page 1 of 4
Check Report
Hughson By Check Number
Date Range: 05/19/2026 - 06/02/2026
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Bank Code: Payable Bank-Payable Bank
01420 CALIFORNIA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 05/22/2026 Regular 0.00 80.24 60876 INV0015827 Invoice 05/06/2026 INCOME WITHHOLDING FOR CHILD SUPP… 0.00 40.12 INV0015923 Invoice 05/20/2026 INCOME WITHHOLDING FOR CHILD SUPP… 0.00 40.12 00016 ABS DIRECT INC 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 1,245.14 60877 143075 Invoice 05/13/2026 BILL PRINTING- May 0.00 1,245.14 01603 Amazon Capital Services, Inc. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 588.29 60878 1H1T-R4CC-PPDT Invoice 05/18/2026 Office Supplies- CABLE 0.00 9.70 1K4Y-6YGR-6GDJ Invoice 04/02/2026 door handle USF 0.00 63.06 1N1H-MKFF-NF… Invoice 04/02/2026 grease for Vacon 0.00 107.88 1R46-XDGR-4WDP Invoice 04/02/2026 box for spray supplies 0.00 31.17 1YF3-1YTD-7TL9 Invoice 05/09/2026 Business Prime Annual Membership Fee 0.00 376.48 00091 AT&T 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 60879
INV0015939 Invoice 05/15/2026 Refund of Encroachment Deposit - ENCR25… 0.00 500.00 INV0015940 Invoice 05/15/2026 Refund of encroachment deposit ENCR25-… 0.00 500.00 INV0015941 Invoice 05/15/2026 Refund of encroachment deposit- ENCR25… 0.00 500.00 00822 BlueTriton Brands Inc 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 129.56 60880 26E0025664277 Invoice 05/22/2026 WWTP waters Blanket PO 0.00 129.56 00302 CITY OF WATERFORD 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 3,257.37 60881 April 2026 Invoice 05/21/2026 Code Enforcement Officer- April 0.00 3,257.37 00310 CLARK'S PEST CONTROL 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 460.00 60882 39708183 Invoice 05/19/2026 PEST CONTROL 0.00 149.00
39708297 Invoice 05/21/2026 PEST CONTROL 0.00 92.00
39708809 Invoice 05/19/2026 WWTP pest control Blanket PO 0.00 219.00 00332 CONDOR EARTH TECHNOLOGIES 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 4,524.60 60883 93225 Invoice 02/28/2026 FY24-27 MS4 Storm Water Support 1/24/… 0.00 687.50 93340 Invoice 03/31/2026 FY24-27 MS4 Storm Water Support 2/24/… 0.00 2,799.65 93472 Invoice 04/30/2026 FY24-27 MS4 Storm Water Support 3/24/… 0.00 1,037.45 00363 CROWN PAINTING INC. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 1,342.00 60884 MCR-002P1 Invoice 04/17/2026 Complete Interior of tank 0.00 1,342.00 01570 CSG Consultants 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 15,499.50 60885 65562 Invoice 04/10/2026 Professional Services - 2/28/26 - 3/27/26 0.00 6,552.00 65996 Invoice 05/08/2026 Professional Services- 3/28/26 - 4/24/26 0.00 8,268.00 B260418 Invoice 04/01/2026 Building Plan Review Services - March 0.00 302.00 B260583 Invoice 05/01/2026 Building Plan Review Services - April 0.00 377.50 00368 CSU STANISLAUS 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 30.00 60886 CMP-016350 Invoice 05/14/2026 April Live Scans 0.00 30.00 00464 EZ NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 6,909.52 60887 TS48530 Invoice 05/21/2026 IT SERVICES- May 0.00 6,909.52 00475 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 3,260.00 60888 634575A Invoice 04/24/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 319.00 634576A Invoice 04/24/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 224.00 634577A Invoice 04/24/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 231.00 634578A Invoice 04/24/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 419.00 634579A Invoice 04/24/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 250.00 635512A Invoice 05/13/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 156.00
Check Report Date Range: 05/19/2026 - 06/02/2026
6/2/2026 6:29:34 PM Page 2 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 635514A Invoice 05/13/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 156.00 635840A Invoice 05/14/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 156.00 635865A Invoice 05/04/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 78.00 635874A Invoice 05/14/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 114.00 635885A Invoice 05/04/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 78.00 636353A Invoice 05/15/2026 WW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 253.00 636354A Invoice 05/13/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 106.00 636355A Invoice 05/13/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 144.00 636356A Invoice 05/13/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 144.00 636377A Invoice 05/18/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 250.00 636378A Invoice 05/18/2026 DW FGL Blanket PO 0.00 182.00 00498 FRANTZ WHOLESALE NURSERY 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 676.75 60889 651287 Invoice 04/16/2026 plants for LL'ds 0.00 133.33
651309 Invoice 04/16/2026 plants for LL'ds 0.00 543.42
02142 G P M Inc. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 7,258.47 60890 14093 Invoice 03/23/2026 peerless pump well 8 recycle 0.00 7,258.47 00528 GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGE 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 82,681.50 60891 326285 Invoice 03/31/2026 6700 Leedom Dump/Sweeping 0.00 853.00 April 2026 Invoice 05/21/2026 GARBAGE SERVICE- April 0.00 81,828.50 02007 Gnxcor USA Inc. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 250.00 60892 6035604 Invoice 05/16/2026 web trining fee (chuck) 0.00 250.00 02107 Health Net of California, Inc. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 21,791.14 60893 INV0015936 Invoice 06/01/2026 Medical Services - June 0.00 21,791.14 00614 HUGHSON FARM SUPPLY 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 787.39 60894 H556967 Invoice 04/01/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 56.08 H557044 Invoice 05/22/2026 blanket PO HFS utilities 0.00 36.17 H557087 Invoice 05/22/2026 blanket PO HFS utilities 0.00 45.72 H557113 Invoice 04/02/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 5.49 H557194 Invoice 04/03/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 78.52 H557590 Invoice 04/07/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 51.72 H557676 Invoice 04/08/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 114.43 H557777 Invoice 04/09/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 40.49 H557785 Invoice 05/22/2026 blanket PO HFS utilities 0.00 93.05 H558329 Invoice 05/22/2026 blanket PO HFS utilities 0.00 16.81 H558537 Invoice 04/17/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 13.42 H558544 Invoice 04/17/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 72.43 H558592 Invoice 04/17/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 78.69 H558982 Invoice 04/22/2026 hughson Farm Blanket PW 0.00 34.50 H559306 Invoice 05/22/2026 blanket PO HFS utilities 0.00 3.62 H559469 Invoice 05/22/2026 blanket PO HFS utilities 0.00 20.19 H559565 Invoice 05/22/2026 blanket PO HFS utilities 0.00 26.06 00659 J.B. Anderson Land Use Planning 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 190.50 60895 758 Invoice 05/01/2026 General Planning Services - April 0.00 190.50 01398 Jose Vasquez 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 495.00 60896 INV0015992 Invoice 05/22/2026 Automatic Doors Service Call - Barton 0.00 495.00 00682 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 7,488.33 60897 691534658560 Invoice 06/01/2026 MEDICAL SERVICES- June 0.00 7,488.33 02108 Microbac Laboratories, Inc 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 82.12 60898 726001413 Invoice 05/08/2026 Microbac/Geo analytical Blanket PO 0.00 82.12 00611 Mid Valley Publications 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 645.43 60899 358222 Invoice 04/13/2026 Legal # 17881 0.00 645.43
00776 MO-CAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 152.67 60900
Check Report Date Range: 05/19/2026 - 06/02/2026
6/2/2026 6:29:34 PM Page 3 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount AR1419935 Invoice 05/19/2026 Copies 0.00 152.67
00884 PITNEY BOWES 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 502.25 60901 INV0015938 Invoice 05/21/2026 POSTAGE 0.00 502.25
00901 PREFERRED ALLIANCE, INC. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 146.63 60902 0211170-IN Invoice 04/30/2026 Monthly Rate Per Participant 0.00 146.63 01943 Quality Service, Inc. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 3,960.00 60903 38624 Invoice 02/19/2026 SWRCB Drought Reports Oct-Dec 2025 0.00 765.00 39019 Invoice 05/22/2026 QSI contract work (water) 0.00 2,430.00 39141 Invoice 05/01/2026 SWRCB drought reports Jan-Mar 2026 0.00 765.00 02097 REV Capital 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 1,959.20 60904 377 Invoice 05/19/2026 Extra Help - PW 05.16.26 0.00 1,959.20 01093 SYNAGRO WEST, LLC 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 7,506.12 60905 68135 Invoice 05/01/2026 Synagro Blanket PO 0.00 7,506.12 01149 TURLOCK IRRIGATION DIST. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 32,827.73 60906 INV0015937 Invoice 05/21/2026 ELECTRIC 0.00 32,827.73
00005 United Site Services of California, Inc. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 242.34 60907 114-14200424 Invoice 05/21/2026 Fence Rental - Feb 0.00 80.78 114-14213674 Invoice 05/21/2026 Fence Rental - March 0.00 80.78 114-14227153 Invoice 04/30/2026 Fence Rental- April 2026 0.00 80.78 01220 WESTURF INC. 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 960.57 60908 1058214 Invoice 04/20/2026 bark for LL'ds 0.00 121.94
1058339 Invoice 04/21/2026 blades for mower 0.00 76.50
1058340 Invoice 04/21/2026 bark for LL'ds 0.00 228.64
1058502 Invoice 04/22/2026 bark for LL'ds 0.00 228.64
1058730 Invoice 04/24/2026 bark for LL'ds 0.00 304.85
01225 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 05/26/2026 Regular 0.00 1,470.00 60909 010-66033 Invoice 05/21/2026 User Fee Study & Development Impact Fee 0.00 1,470.00 Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code Payable Bank Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
34 0
0 0
0 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
34 0.00
Payment
210,900.36
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
210,900.36
Payable
Count
90 0
0 0
0 90
Check Report Date Range: 05/19/2026 - 06/02/2026
6/2/2026 6:29:34 PM Page 4 of 4
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
34 0
0 0
0 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
34 0.00
210,900.36
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
210,900.36
90 0
0 0
0 90
Fund Name Period Amount
Fund Summary
999 POOLED CASH/CONSOLIDATED CASH 5/2026 210,900.36
210,900.36
Meeting Date: June 8, 2026
Subject: Approval of the Treasurer’s Report for April 2026 Enclosure: Treasurer Report – April 2026
Presented By: Kim Weimer, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Approved By: __________________________
City Manager
Recommendation:
Approve the Treasurer’s Report for the Month Ended of April 2026.
Background and Overview:
Treasurer’s Reports are an important and necessary document for cities and local agencies and are one of the simplest but most important financial controls. Treasurer’s Reports demonstrate strong stewardship of public funds, support clean audits, provide transparency to a close‑knit community, help Council understand the City’s financial position, and reduce risk in a lean‑staff environment.
The attached Treasurer’s Reportsummarizesthe City’s cash balances, investment holdings, and fund activity for the reporting period. Key elements include:
• Cash and Investment Balances: A consolidated view of all City funds held in bank accounts, LAIF, and other permitted investment vehicles. • Interest Earnings: Monthly interest accrued and posted to applicable funds. • Fund Balances: Beginning and ending balancesfor each fund, reflecting receipts and disbursements.
• Investment Compliance: A statement confirming that all investments comply with the City’s adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code. • Cash‑Flow Sufficiency: Certification that the City has adequate liquidity to meet its financial obligations for the next six months.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.3
SECTION 3: CONSENT CALENDAR
Thisreport providesthe City Council and the public with a transparentsnapshot ofthe City’s financial position and supports ongoing fiscal stewardship.
Discussion:
As of April 2026, the City of Hughson has a cash and investment balance total of $44,406,177 with $3,959,778 invested. All investment actions executed since the last report have been made in full compliance with the City of Hughson’s Investment Policy. The City of Hughson will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months as required by California Government Code Section 53646 (b) (2) and (3) respectively.
The Treasurer Report for April 2026 reflects the most current representation of the City’s funds and investments and provides a necessary outlook for both past, and present investment and spending habits. While investments and funds differ from time to time, it is the goal of the City to maintain safety and stability with its funds, while additionally promoting prudence and growth.
Included with the Treasurer’s Report for April 2026 are supplementary graphs depicting the percentage of the City’s total funds, a breakdown of the Developer Impact Fees, and an additional line plot graph further demonstrating the Developer Impact Fees. This graph depicts the Developer Impact Fees’ actual balance for the past five years.
After reviewing and evaluating the report, City staff has researched funds with a significant deficit balance and submits the following detailed explanation for April 2026:
• The Transportation Capital Project Fund 420 currently reflects a negative balance of ($238,477). As the City continues to produce transportation projects, the transportation fund will likely continue to show a negative balance. City staff will continue to monitor and report the status of these reimbursements as the funds become available.
• The CDBG Street Project Fund 425 currently reflects a negative balance of ($533,402) reflecting a negative difference of $517,317 from the previous year. We have not yet received the budgeted reimbursement for the monies spent on the 2nd Street Sidewalk project of $572,411.
• The Park Development Impact Fund 453 currently reflects a negative balance of ($199,995). We are expecting $182,536 to be reimbursed from the Parks Per Capita Grant. This grant is contributing to the Lebright Improvements, namely the restroom/snack bar facility.
Fiscal Impact:
As of April 2026, the City’s cash and investments total $44,406,177. This compares to the April 2025 balance of $41,590,544 and represents an increase of $2,815,633. There is no fiscal impact associated with receiving and filing this report. The Treasurer’s Report reflects financial activity already recorded in the City’s accounting system.
MONEY MARKET GENERAL REDEVELOPMENT
**
TOTAL
Bank Statement Totals $ 40,330,695 $ 499,801 $ - $ 40,830,496 Adjustment $ 376 $ 219
Outstanding Deposits + $ 53,347 $ 87,040 $ - $ 140,387
Outstanding Checks/transfers - $ (95,869) $ (526,792) $ - $ (622,661) ADJUSTED TOTAL $ 40,288,549 $ 60,268 $ - $ 40,348,221
Investments: Value @ purchase price $ 1,224,044
Investments: Change in Market Value & interest received $ (5,129) Multi-Bank WWTP Value at purchase price $ 2,746,094
Multi-Bank WWTP Change in Market Value & interest received $ (5,231) Investments: L.A.I.F. $ 49,167 $ 49,011 $ 98,178
General Ledger Adjustments
Wages Payable
TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS $ 44,406,177
Books - All Funds April-25 April-26 Difference % of Variance GENERAL FUND $ 5,147,435 $ 5,542,592 $ 395,157 7.68%
GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY RESERVE $ 1,369,366 $ 1,452,720 $ 83,354 6.09% FIXED ASSESTS $ 12,426 $ 12,426 $ - n/a
SEWER $ 4,158,497 $ 4,269,597 $ 111,100 2.67%
SEWER FIXED ASSET REPLACEMENT $ 4,775,870 $ 4,480,979 $ (294,891) -6.17% SEWER DEV IMPACT FEE $ 1,851,762 $ 3,107,874 $ 1,256,112 67.83% WWTP Expansion 2008 $ (141,356) $ (59,632) $ 81,723 57.81% WATER $ 4,600,577 $ 4,594,044 $ (6,534) -0.14%
Water TCP123 $ 5,567,811 $ 5,565,151 $ (2,660) -0.05%
WATER DEV IMPACT FEE $ 1,605,418 $ 2,295,533 $ 690,115 42.99% Water Fixed Asset Replacement $ 1,704,052 $ 1,796,793 $ 92,741 5.44% COMMUNITY/SENIOR CENTER $ 19,125 $ 24,211 $ 5,086 26.60% U.S.F. Resource Com. Center $ (25,099) $ (43,696) $ (18,598) -74.10% Garbage/Refuse $ 215,498 $ 140,665 $ (74,833) -34.73%
GAS TAX 2103 $ 206,737 $ 206,879 $ 142 0.07%
GAS TAX 2105 $ 54,790 $ 71,581 $ 16,791 30.65%
GAS TAX 2106 $ (62,373) $ (62,834) $ (461) -0.74%
GAS TAX 2107 $ 98,048 $ 115,098 $ 17,050 17.39%
GAS TAX 2107.5 $ 6,922 $ 7,922 $ 1,000 14.45%
Measure L SALES TAX-ROADS $ 1,355,594 $ 1,281,286 $ (74,309) -5.48% SB-1 ROADS MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION $ 750,208 $ 982,058 $ 231,850 30.90% LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ (1,146) $ (1,146) $ - 0.00% BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ (127) $ (127) $ - 0.00%
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT $ 7,255 $ 7,255 $ - 0.00% COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT DEV IMPACT FEE $ 507,537 $ 658,452 $ 150,915 29.73% TRENCH CUT FUND $ 222,094 $ 222,094 $ - 0.00%
IT RESERVE $ 52,793 $ 64,944 $ 12,151 23.02%
SELF-INSURANCE $ 73,303 $ 73,303 $ - 0.00%
DIABILITY ACCESS AND EDUCATION $ 7,530 $ 9,605 $ 2,075 27.55% CLAIM ON CASH-CLFRF/ARPA $ 501,141 $ 293,609 $ (207,532) -41.41% AB109 PUBLIC SAFETY $ 35,722 $ 35,722 $ - 0.00%
ASSET FORFEITURE $ 1,660 $ 1,660 $ - 0.00%
VEHICLE ABATEMENT $ 66,077 $ 16,225 $ (49,852) -75.45%
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE $ 675,133 $ 691,881 $ 16,749 2.48% FEDERAL FUNDED OFFICER FUND $ 6,620 $ 6,620 $ - 0.00%
98-EDBG-605 BUSINESS ASSISTANCE $ 93,596 $ 93,596 $ - 0.00% 96-EDBG-438 Grant $ 403 $ 403 $ - 0.00%
94-STBG-799 HOUSING REHAB $ 232,819 $ 233,375 $ 556 0.24% HOME Program Grant (FTHB) $ 104,077 $ 174,077 $ 70,000 67.26% 96-STBG-1013 Grant $ 211,489 $ 211,995 $ 505 0.24%
CALHOME REHAB $ 117,910 $ 117,910 $ - 0.00%
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION $ 51,671 $ 51,671 $ - 0.00%
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION NON MOTORIZED $ 13,219 $ 13,219 $ - 0.00% TRANSPORTATION STREET PROJECTS $ (238,477) $ (238,477) $ - 0.00% PUBLIC WORKS STREET PROJECTS-CDBG $ (16,029) $ (533,402) $ (517,374) -3227.77% STORM DRAIN DEV IMPACT FEE $ 1,021,768 $ 1,422,433 $ 400,665 39.21% PUBLIC FACILITY DEV IMPACT FEE $ 2,163,047 $ 2,386,485 $ 223,438 10.33% PUBLIC FACILITY STREET DEV IMPACT FEE $ 880,925 $ 1,055,217 $ 174,293 19.79% PARK DEV IMPACT FEE $ (199,995) $ (199,995) $ - 0.00%
PARKLAND IN LIEU $ 645,886 $ 647,430 $ 1,543 0.24%
WATER/SEWER DEPOSIT $ 116,696 $ 122,977 $ 6,281 5.38%
RDA SUCCESSOR AGENCY $ 412,319 $ 409,991 $ (2,327) -0.56% RDA FIXED ASSETS $ - $ - $ - n/a
LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ (12,987) $ (20,018) $ (7,031) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 49,442 $ 45,496 $ (3,946) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 870 $ (12,283) $ (13,154) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 53,981 $ 57,905 $ 3,925 n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ (17,994) $ (10,940) $ 7,054 n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 1,096 $ (1,581) $ (2,677) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 48,021 $ 55,162 $ 7,141 n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ (118,179) $ (135,085) $ (16,906) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ (78,788) $ (89,889) $ (11,101) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 21,563 $ 20,037 $ (1,526) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 49,778 $ 50,150 $ 372 n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 13,570 $ 7,912 $ (5,658) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ (8,705) $ (10,974) $ (2,268) n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 49,168 $ 56,173 $ 7,005 n/a LANDSCAPE LIGHTING DISTRICT $ 22,350 $ 28,546 $ 6,196 n/a BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ 61,582 $ 55,497 $ (6,085) n/a BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ 7,820 $ 4,588 $ (3,232) n/a BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ 167,509 $ 175,211 $ 7,702 n/a BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ (6,501) $ (7,902) $ (1,401) n/a BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ 75,317 $ 83,143 $ 7,826 n/a BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ 66,846 $ 79,249 $ 12,403 n/a BENEFIT ASSESMENT DISTRICT $ 24,158 $ 32,319 $ 8,161 n/a COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT $ 67,093 $ 87,344 $ 20,251 n/a COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT $ 15,309 $ 25,870 $ 10,561 Developer Impact Fees *** $ 7,830,460 $ 10,725,998 $ 2,895,538 TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 41,590,544 $ 44,406,177 $ 2,815,633
Break Down of Impact Fees ***
SEWER DEV IMPACT FEE $ 1,851,762 $ 3,107,874 $ 1,256,112 67.83% WATER DEV IMPACT FEE $ 1,605,418 $ 2,295,533 $ 690,115 42.99% COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT DEV IMPACT FEE $ 507,537 $ 658,452 $ 150,915 29.73% STORM DRAIN DEV IMPACT FEE $ 1,021,768 $ 1,422,433 $ 400,665 39.21% PUBLIC FACILITY DEV IMPACT FEE $ 2,163,047 $ 2,386,485 $ 223,438 10.33% PUBLIC FACILITY STREET DEV IMPACT FEE $ 880,925 $ 1,055,217 $ 174,293 19.79% PARK DEV IMPACT FEE $ (199,995) $ (199,995) $ - 0.00%
Break Down of Impact Fees *** $ 7,830,460 $ 10,725,998 $ 2,895,538 36.98% Reviewed By: Sopheap Dong-Carreon Date
City of Hughson
Treasurer's Report
April 2026
I hereby certify that the investment activity fo
this reporting period conforms with the
Investment Policy adopted by the Hughson City
Council, and the California Government Code
Section 53601. I also certify that there are
adequate funds available to meet the City o
Hughson's budgeted and actual expenditures
for the next six months.
5/26/2026
Meeting Date: June 8, 2026
Subject: Calling and Giving Notice of a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the Election of Certain Officers as Required by the Provisions of the Laws of the State of California Relating to General Law Cities and Requesting Election
Consolidation with Stanislaus County.
Enclosures: Notice of Election
Presented By: Dominique Romo, City Manager
Staff Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution No. 2026-13, calling and giving notice of the General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain City officers, and requesting that the election be consolidated with Stanislaus County in accordance with State law.
Background & Overview:
Under the California Elections Code, General Law cities are required to formally order their municipal elections and request consolidation with the County when the election is to be conducted as part of the statewide election cycle. The City of Hughson holds its General Municipal Elections in November of even‑numbered years, consistent with State requirements and the City’s established election schedule.
California Elections Code §10403 outlines the procedures for cities to request consolidation with the County, while §10403.5 requires the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors to approve such requests. In March 2026, the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution authorizing the provision of election services and the consolidation of elections for any requesting city or district within Stanislaus County. This action also delegated authority to the Registrar of Voters to conduct election services on behalf of those agencies, consistent with the specifications outlined in each jurisdiction’s formal request.
This County‑level authorization significantly streamlines the consolidation process. Rather than requiring each city or district to seek individual approval at a Board of Supervisors meeting, the County’s blanket resolution allows local agencies to request consolidation directly through the Registrar of Voters. This reduces administrative burden, shortens CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.4
SECTION 3: CONSENT CALENDAR
processing timelines, and ensures a more efficient and consistent approach to election administration across the County.
Adoption of this resolution ensures that the City complies with all statutory deadlines and procedural requirements for the 2026 election cycle.
Election Notice and Candidate Filing Period:
A public notice announcing the 2026 General Municipal Election and the offices to be filled will be published in the Hughson Chronicle on Tuesday, July 7, 2026. The Candidate Nomination Period will open on July 13, 2026, and close on August 7, 2026. During this period, candidate packets will be available for individuals interested in running for office.
To qualify, candidates must be registered voters in Stanislaus County and residents within the Hughson city limits. If an eligible incumbent does not file for re‑election, the nomination period for that specific office will automatically extend to Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at 5:00 p.m., for all candidates other than the incumbent, as required by State law.
The following offices are scheduled for election on November 3, 2026:
Office Incumbent Compensation Term
Mayor George Carr $300.00/month 4-year term
Council Member Julie Ann Strain $250.00/month 4-year term Council Member Randy Crooker $250.00/month 4-year term
Purpose of Consolidation:
Consolidating the City’s election with the statewide election administered by Stanislaus County provides several benefits, including:
• Cost efficiency through shared election administration expenses • Voter convenience by aligning with a high‑turnout statewide election • Administrative accuracy and compliance through County‑managed ballot processing, staffing, and reporting
This approach is consistent with past practice and ensures that the City meets all legal and procedural requirements.
Fiscal Impact:
For Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the estimated cost for election services and required publication notices is $25,000. This anticipated expense will be incorporated into the City’s Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Proposed Budget and reflects typical costs associated with consolidated municipal elections.
CITY OF HUGHSON
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGHSON
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE
PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
AND REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION OF THIS ELECTION WITH STANISLAUS COUNTY WHEREAS, Under the provisions of the laws relating to General Law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the Election of Municipal Officers; and
WHEREAS, the California Statewide General Election will be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with section 10403 of the California Elections Code, it is desirable that the Election of Municipal Officers be consolidated with the California Statewide General Election and held on the same date and that within the City the precincts, polling places, and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the County Election Department canvas the returns of the Election of Municipal Officers and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hughson does hereby declare, determine, and order as follows:
1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Hughson, Stanislaus County, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, a General Municipal Election for the following purpose of:
a. Electing a Mayor for a term of four (4) years; and two (2) Council members each for a term of four (4) years; and
2. That pursuant to the requirements of section 10403 of the California Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of an Election of Municipal Officers with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the purpose of electing a Mayor for a term of four (4) years; and two (2) Council members each for a term of four (4) years; and
3. That pursuant to section 10002 of the California Elections Code the Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus is requested to issue instructions to the County Election Official to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election; and
4. Pursuant to section 14018 of the Elections Code that the consolidated election shall be held and conducted, election boards appointed, voting precincts designated, candidates nominated, ballots printed, polls opened and closed, voter challenges determined, ballots counted and returned, returns canvassed, results declared, certificates of election issued, recounts conducted, election contests presented, and all other proceedings incidental to and connected with the election shall be regulated and done in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election; and
5. That the City of Hughson recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for such costs; and
6. That the vote centers for the election shall open at seven o’clock am (7:00 a.m.) of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock pm (8:00 p.m.), except as provided in §14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California; and
7. Pursuant to §13307(c) of the Elections Code of the State of California, candidates shall be required to pay, in advance, for the pro rata cost of printing the candidate statement in the voter pamphlet; and
8. Candidate statements will be limited to no more than 200 words; and
9. A $750.00 deposit shall be required at the time of filing of the nomination paper of those candidates who wish to submit a statement for printing in the voter pamphlet; and
10. The amount of the deposit is based upon an estimated cost and candidates will be required to pay the actual cost of printing, and the City Clerk is directed to bill candidates for additional actual expenses or refund any excess amount paid depending upon the actual cost of printing of the candidate statement in the voter pamphlet; and
11. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the Election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding Municipal Elections; and
12. That Notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form, and manner as required by law; and
13. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Election Division of the County of Stanislaus.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hughson at a regular meeting held on this 8th day of June 2026, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
______________________
GEORGE CARR, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
DOMINIQUE ROMO, City Manager
NOTICE OF ELECTION
CITY OF HUGHSON
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a General Municipal Election will be held in the City of Hughson on Tuesday, the 3rd day of November 2026, for the following Officers:
Mayor Full term of four (4) years
Two (2) Members of the City Council Full terms of four (4) years each The Nomination Period for these offices begins on Monday, July 13, 2026, and closes on Friday, August 7, 2026.
If nomination papers for an incumbent officer of the City are not filed by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 7, 2026 (the 88th day before the Election), the voters shall have until the 83rd day before the election, Wednesday, August 12, 2026, to nominate candidates for that incumbent’s elective office.
If no one or only one person is nominated for an elective office, appointment to the elective office may be made as prescribed by §10229, Elections Code of the State of California.
Vote centers will be open between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.
Nomination papers can be secured from the City Clerk’s Office. Please call City Hall at 209-883-4054 or visit the City of Hughson website at www.hughson.org.
ATTEST:
City Manager
July 1, 2026
Meeting Date: June 8, 2026
Subject: Approving the updated User Fee Schedule, effective September 1 Enclosures: Resolution
City of Hughson Comprehensive User Fee Study
Supplemental Fee Document
Presented By: Kim Weimer, Director of Finance & Admin. Services Approved By: ________________________________
City Manager
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution No. 2026-14, approving the Updated User Fee Schedule, effective September 1, 2026.
Background & Overview:
On June 27, 2022, the Hughson City Council approved a project list for the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds allocated to the City of Hughson. Included in the approved projects was $75,000 designated for hiring a consultant to develop a master fee schedule and cost allocation plan.
In February 2024, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) to complete a comprehensive user fee study and cost allocation plan. Willdan Financial Services was awarded the contract for these services.
Many of the City’s fees have remained unchanged since 2009, resulting in an estimated 39% loss of revenue due to inflation and increased service delivery costs. Updating the fee schedule will help ensure the City is recovering the cost of essential staff time and resources. Staff noted, however, that even with the proposed updates, several fees will still not achieve full cost recovery or fully offset the 39% revenue loss. This context may be important should concerns be raised about the magnitude of the proposed increases.
Discussion:
The purpose of the user fee study was to identify the full cost of providing each City service at the appropriate activity level and in compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, and regulations governing the collection of public fees. The study compared the City’s CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.1
SECTION 5: PUBLIC HEARING
current service costs with existing cost‑recovery levels, including both services for which the City currently charges fees and services for which fees may be appropriate based on historical practices or the practices of comparable jurisdictions.
The study identifies the cost recovery amount for each service, representing the total cost of providing that service. Any fee set below the cost‑recovery level represents a subsidy to be allocated from the City’s General Fund.
General Fund:
The City’s General Fund is the primary operating fund that supports nearly all essential and recurring municipal services. It is a discretionary fund made up of unrestricted revenues that may be allocated to any municipal purpose allowed by law. Hughson’s General Fund supports core services including police and dispatch, animal services, parks and recreation, community development, public works, and general administration.
General Fund revenues include:
Property taxes (largest source)
Sales taxes
Vehicle license fees
General licenses and permits
Fines and penalties
Unrestricted state or federal revenues
The General Fund is the most flexible, and most scrutinized, portion of the City’s budget. A healthy General Fund is critical for maintaining stable public services. When fees are set below the full cost of providing a service, the difference must be subsidized by the General Fund. This reduces the City’s ability to fund other essential services and increases the city’s vulnerability to future or potential structural deficits, most especially during economic downturns.
The reality is that the cost of providing services has increased significantly over the years:
fuel, labor, supplies, wages, insurances, staffing, and other operational expenses continue to increase. Most agencies and businesses adjust their fees regularly to keep up with the increases and keep their operations running efficiently for the future. However, the City has not updated many of its user fees since 2009, despite absorbing these higher costs over several years. As a result, the General Fund subsidizes services that should potentially be funded by the individuals or entities that are receiving the direct benefit, unless otherwise decided by the City Council.
User fees that do not reflect the full cost of providing the service create an unintended subsidy. This subsidy is borne by all taxpayers, regardless of whether they use the service.
Full cost recovery ensures that:
• Private‑benefit services are paid for by the user, not the general taxpayer • General Fund dollars remain available for programs and services that provide broad community benefit
• Service levels remain sustainable, as fee revenue keeps pace with rising labor, materials, and regulatory compliance costs
• Fiscal transparency and equity are maintained, ensuring that the cost-of-service delivery is clearly understood and appropriately allocated.
Wildan Financial Services, in conjunction with city staff, determined the time estimates for each service and cost of direct and indirect services. Indirect services are the allocation of costs for central services which include Finance, the City Manager, and Human Resources.
The results of this study identify a need to update several fees in the areas of business license, parks and recreation, community centers, planning and building.
Supplemental Document with updated User Fee Recommendations Park and Recreation User Fees
Staff notes that the fees addressed in this section are included in the supplemental document to the User Fee Study, which recommends updates for consistency and movement toward full cost recovery numbers. The field use fees at Rolland Starn Park and Lebright Park currently differ, with Lebright’s fees being lower for similar use. Staff recommend revising the previously suggested fees to align the field rental rates across both parks for local, non‑local, and non‑profit users. Tournament fees were also updated to reflect a higher fee at Lebright due to multiple fields being available, while Starn’s tournament fee remained unchanged because there is only one field. Most of the suggested fees in the supplemental document suggest an increase.
Staff further notes that Line 15, the fee for use of ball field lights, was updated from $46 as the suggested fee - to $75 per hour based on current TID electricity costs, which currently average approximately $117 per hour and have increased by 18% over the last 2–3 years.
Regarding Line 31, the current monthly fee of $200 for Hughson Youth Baseball and Softball was originally established for full use of the Lebright Park fields. Under the current fee structure, $200 equates to two tournament weekends (four full days) for a local non‑profit user. Staff recommends that Council consider updating this fee to better align with the current and proposed fee schedules.
Community Center User Fees
Fees addressed in this section are also included in the supplemental document to the User Fee Study. Increases in rental fees are being proposed for the Senior Community Center, reflective of the costs associated with its renting, as well as comparison with similar and neighboring community centers. The proposed fees are in line with what neighboring centers are charging, which include use of new tables and chairs, brand new restrooms facilities, and a full-sized kitchen with large ice machine. Costs associated with renting the
center include cleaning/mopping fees, stocking and re-stocking of all toiletries, and staff time spent conducting walk throughs and inspections, as well as application and deposit refund processing and statuses (admin).
Staff Recommendations with Additional Policy Considerations:
Staff recommend that the City Council adopt the updated User Fee Schedule and incorporate the following policy considerations to ensure the City’s fee structure remains accurate, equitable, and financially sustainable:
Adopt full cost recovery for all services that primarily benefit individual users. User fees should recover the direct labor and material costs associated with providing the service, as well as the reasonable share of central service support costs identified in the City’s Cost Allocation Plan.
Include indirect cost recovery by continuing to apply the indirect overhead percentages calculated through the Cost Allocation Plan. This ensures that departments receiving support from Finance, the City Manager’s Office, Human Resources, and other central services contribute proportionately to those costs.
Implement an annual inflationary adjustment to maintain the fee schedule’s accuracy between comprehensive studies. Staff recommend using an annual inflation adjustor like the Consumer Price Index (CPI), provided that a cap or maximum adjustment is selected and that the selected index does not cause fees to exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the service. A cap and/or maximum CPI adjustment between 3- 5% is appropriate and recommended.
Approve the updated user fee schedule to become effective September 1, 2026.
Conduct an annual internal review of the fee schedule to ensure fees remain aligned with actual service costs and operational changes.
Complete a comprehensive fee study at least every five years to evaluate the full range of services, add or remove fees as needed, and update cost‑of‑service calculations.
These policy actions will ensure that the City’s user fees remain current, legally compliant, and reflective of the true cost of service delivery, thereby reducing reliance on the General Fund and supporting long‑term fiscal stability.
Fiscal Impact:
If approved as recommended, this item will adjust the City’s user fees to more accurately reflect reasonable cost‑recovery levels, resulting in increased revenue primarily within planning, building, and parks and recreation services. This increase will reduce subsidies being allocated from the General Fund.
CITY OF HUGHSON
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGHSON APPROVING THE UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 WHEREAS, the City of Hughson last completed a comprehensive update to its Master Fee Schedule in 2009, and many fees have remained unchanged despite significant increases in the cost of providing municipal services; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2022, the City Council allocated American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to support the development of a Master Fee Schedule and Cost Allocation Plan, including $75,000 for consultant services; and
WHEREAS, in February 2024, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a comprehensive user fee study and cost allocation plan, and Willdan Financial Services was awarded the contract; and
WHEREAS, Willdan Financial Services completed the draft User Fee Study, which identifies the full cost of providing City services, including direct labor, materials, and indirect central service costs derived from the City’s Cost Allocation Plan; and WHEREAS, the study identifies the cost-recovery amount for each service and demonstrates that many existing fees do not recover the full cost of service delivery, resulting in ongoing subsidies from the City’s General Fund; and WHEREAS, the General Fund is the most flexible and most scrutinized portion of the City’s budget, and maintaining a healthy General Fund is essential for sustaining core public services and avoiding structural deficits, particularly during economic downturns; and WHEREAS, staff recommend adopting a policy of 100% full cost recovery for services that provide a direct, private benefit to the user, consistent with municipal best practices, industry standards, and principles of fiscal responsibility, equity, and transparency; and WHEREAS, staff further recommends implementing an annual inflationary adjustment to maintain the accuracy of the Master Fee Schedule between comprehensive studies, using a consistent and appropriate index such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the implicit price deflator for GDP, or a personnel-related inflator, provided that no fee exceeds the reasonable estimated cost of providing the service; and WHEREAS, staff recommend conducting an annual internal review of the fee schedule and a comprehensive fee study every five years to ensure fees remain current, legally compliant, and reflective of actual service costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hughson hereby adopts the updated Master Fee Schedule as presented and directs staff to implement the fee levels based on full cost recovery for services that provide a direct, private benefit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts a policy of 100% full cost recovery for applicable user fees, consistent with the cost-of-service data and the City’s Cost Allocation Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council directs staff to apply an annual inflationary adjustment to the Master Fee Schedule using a consistent, transparent index that does not cause fees to exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the service.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council directs staff to conduct an annual internal review of the Master Fee Schedule and to complete a comprehensive fee study every five years, including the addition, amendment, or removal of fees as appropriate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hughson at its regular meeting held on this 8th day of June 2026, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
_____________________
GEORGE CARR, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
DOMINIQUE ROMO, City Manager
City of Hughson
Comprehensive User Fee Study
i Comprehensive User Fee Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1 User Fee Background ............................................................................................... 2 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 2 California User Fee History .......................................................................................................................... 2 Additional Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................. 3 Study Objective ....................................................................................................... 4 Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Aim of the Report......................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Approach and Methodology ........................................................................... 3 Conceptual Approach................................................................................................................................... 3 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates........................................................................................................................ 3 Summary Steps of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 4 Allowable Costs ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Quality Control/Quality Assurance .............................................................................................................. 5 Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees............................................................................. 5 City Staff Contributions ................................................................................................................................ 6 Hughson User Fees .................................................................................................. 7 Cost Recovery............................................................................................................................................... 7 Subsidization ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Revenue Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Impact on Demand (Elasticity) ..................................................................................................................... 8 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Parks and Recreation .............................................................................................. 9 Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Business License .................................................................................................... 10 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Building ................................................................................................................ 11 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 11
ii Comprehensive User Fee Study
Planning ............................................................................................................... 12 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Code Enforcement ................................................................................................. 13 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered .................................................. 14 Appendix B –Fully Burdened Hourly Rates ................................................................ 15 Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis ....................................................................... 17
1 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Executive Summary
The City of Hughson engaged Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to determine the full costs incurred by the City to support the various activities for which the City charges user fees. Due to the complexity and the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to identify the full costs of individual fee and program activities. This report and the appendices herein identify 100% full cost recovery for City services. Appendix C details the full cost and suggested fees as determined through discussion with departmental staff. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.
2 Comprehensive User Fee Study
User Fee Background
Background
As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund programs and services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole (“User Fees”). As cities struggle to maintain levels of service and variability of demand, they have become increasingly aware of subsidies provided by the General Fund and have implemented cost-recovery targets. To the extent that governments use general tax monies to provide individuals with private benefits, and not require them to pay the full cost of the service (and, therefore, receive a subsidy), the government is limiting funds that may be available to provide other community-wide benefits. In effect, the government is using community funds to pay for private benefits. Unlike most revenue sources, cities have more control over the level of user fees they charge to recover costs, or the subsidies they can institute.
Fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, Proposition 26, and the California Code of Regulations. The Code also requires that the City Council adopt fees by either ordinance or resolution, and that any fees in excess of the estimated total cost of rendering the related services must be approved by a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting because the charge would be considered a tax and not a fee. There are no fees suggested to be set above the cost of service and as such a public vote is not required.
California User Fee History
Before Proposition 13, in times of fiscal shortages, California cities were able to raise property taxes, which funded everything from police and recreation to development-related services. However, this situation changed with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.
Proposition 13 established the era of revenue limitation in California local government. In subsequent years, the state saw a series of additional limitations to local government revenues. Proposition 4 (1979) defined the difference between a tax and a fee: a fee can be no greater than the cost of providing the service; and Proposition 218 (1996) further limited the imposition of taxes for certain classes of fees. As a result, cities were required to secure a supermajority vote in order to enact or increase taxes. Due to the thresholds needed to increase local taxes, cities have less control and very few successful options for new revenues.
The State of California took a series of actions in the 1990’s and 2000’s to improve the State’s fiscal situation, at the expense of local governments. In 2004-05, the Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (“ERAF”) take-away of property taxes and the reduction of Vehicle License Fees further reduced local tax revenues.
In addition, on November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, the “Stop Hidden Taxes Initiative”, which is aimed at defining “regulatory fees” as a special tax rather than a fee, thus requiring approval by two-thirds vote of local voters. These regulatory fees are typically intended to mitigate the societal and environmental impacts of a business or person’s activities. Proposition 26 contains seven categories of exceptions. The fees analyzed as part of a User Fee study typically fall under categories one through five consisting of charges for specific benefits, government service, regulatory need, for use of government property, or a fine/penalty.
3 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Additional Policy Considerations
State regulations require that municipalities update their fee schedules to reflect the actual costs of certain public services primarily benefiting users. User Fees recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby typically reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.
In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering user services, it is common for local governments to recover reasonable support costs. Support costs are those costs relating to a local government’s central service departments that are allocable to the local government’s operating departments. Central services support cost allocations were incorporated using the resulting indirect overhead percentages determined through the City’s Cost Allocation Plan. A Cost Allocation Plan identifies the central service functions of the City such as Finance, City Manager, Human Resources, and others and allocates their cost to the departments and funds of the City that they support.
This plan was used in the User Fee study to account for the burden placed upon central services by the operating departments to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost through the study.
As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is recommended that the City utilize an inflationary index, as described below, to increase fees in the years between when a cost study is done.
The City may employ many different inflationary factors. The most commonly used inflator is some form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it is widely well known and accepted. A similar inflator is the implicit price deflator for GDP, which is much like the CPI except that while the CPI is based on the same “basket” of goods and services every year, the price deflators’ “basket” can change year to year. Since the primary factor for the cost of a City’s services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an inflationary factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs can also be suitable if there is a clear method, or current practice of obtaining said factor.
Each City should use an inflator that they believe works the best for their specific situation and needs but cannot rely solely on the CPI increase as it is incumbent upon each agency to ensure the amount of the fees charged does not exceeds the reasonable estimated costs of providing the services. It is also recommended that the City perform this internal review annually with a comprehensive review of services and fees performed every five years, which would include adding, amending, or removing fees for programs/services.
4 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Study Objective
As the City of Hughson seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased service demands, it needs a variety of tools. A User Fee Study provides assurance that the City has the best information and the best resources available to make sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees, maintain compliance with state law and local policies, and meet the needs of the City administration and its constituency. Given the limitations on raising revenue in local government, the City recognizes that a User Fee Study is a very cost-effective way to understand the total cost of services and identify potential fee deficiencies. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group.
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is based on the full cost of providing City services, including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full cost recovery fee for the City to provide each service; however, each fee is set at the City’s discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.
The principal goal of the study was to help the City determine the full cost of the services that the City provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
Developing a rational basis for setting fees
Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model Ensuring compliance with State law
Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better understand its true costs of providing services and may serve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regarding the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect from individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.
Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and calculation of the user fees charged by the following Hughson departments and fee groups:
Parks and Recreation
Business License
Building
Planning
Code Enforcement
The study involved the identification of existing and potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, orientation and consultation, quality control, communication and presentations, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels.
2 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City services, as City staff currently provide them at existing, known, or reasonably anticipated service and staff level needs. This report provides a summary of the study results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determine the recommended fee schedule. The report is not intended to document all of the numerous discussions throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide an influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized tools, techniques, or alternative approaches.
3 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determine the “reasonable cost” of each service provided by the City for which it charges a user fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the City’s fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.
The standard fee limitation established in California law for such fees is the “estimated, reasonable cost” principle. In order to maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figures, time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.
Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates (FBHRs) that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and benefits (see Appendix B), but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that are included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
Operating costs applicable to fee operations
Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead Indirect City-wide overhead costs calculated through the 15% de minimis indirect rate An important factor in determining the fully burdened rate is in the calculation of productive hours for personnel. This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this figure to 1,650 productive or billable hours to account for calculated or anticipated hours’ employees are involved in non-billable activities such as paid vacation, sick leave, holidays, and other considerations as necessary.
Dividing the full cost, including overhead, of a position by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.
The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time estimates, when appropriate for how a service is provided, to calculate a fee’s cost based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service.
4 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Summary Steps of the Study
The process of the study is straightforward and simple in concept. The following list provides a summary of the study process steps:
Allowable Costs
This report identifies three types of costs that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service (Appendix A). Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City’s
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee-related
services.
Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function. Central Services Overhead: These costs represent services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support other City departments.
Data Analysis
Department Interviews
Time Estimates
Labor Costs
Indirect Support
Building Cost Layers
Direct Services
Indirect Services
Department Overhead
City-Wide Overhead
Set Fees
Define the Full Cost of
Services
Set Cost Recovery Policy
5 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Methodology
The three methods of analysis for calculating fees used in this report are the:
Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build-Up Approach): This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable when City staff time requirements do not vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project’s outset. Further, the method is effective in instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or permit for another department on an as-needed basis. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.
Program Cost Approach: In some instances, the underlying data is not available or varies widely, leaving a standard unit cost build-up approach impractical. In addition, market factors and policy concerns (as opposed to actual costs) tend to influence rental based fee levels more than other types of services. Willdan employed a different methodology where appropriate to fit a programs’ needs and goals. Typical programmatic approach cases are valuation-based fees, Recreation programs, and instances where a program cost is divided over the user base to obtain a per applicant cost for shared cost services.
Valuation Based Fees: This manner of collection is used when the valuation of the improvement can be used as a proxy for the amount of effort it would take for City staff to complete the service provided. More specifically, this approach is commonly used for certain User Fees in the Building Division. It is generally accepted that as a project’s size scales up, the cost of the project increases, and the amount of effort needed to review and inspect also increases. Using a valuation-based fees provides for a system that can adjust as project sizes scale. Land is not included in the valuation.
Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ultimate results to be inconsistent and unsound. The elements of our Quality Control process for User Fee calculations include:
Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
Reasonableness tests and validation
Internal and external reviews
Cross-checking
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees
Within the fee tables in Appendix C, the differences are identified between the full costs calculated through the study and the fee levels currently in effect. The reasons for differences between the two can arise from a number of possible factors including:
6 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Previous fee levels may have been set at levels less than full cost intentionally, based on policy decisions
Position staffing levels, seniority, and the positions that complete fee and service activity may vary from when the previous costs were calculated
Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that differed from any inflationary factors used to increase fees since the last study
Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the City as a whole Changes in the demand for services in a City may have also changed the staffing or cost structure of departments over time
City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
Budget and other cost data
Staffing structures
Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions Direct work hours (billable/non-billable)
Time estimates to complete work tasks
Review of draft results and other documentation
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement of the managers and line staff from the departments on top of their existing workloads and competing priorities. The contributions from City staff were critical to this study. We would like to express our appreciation to the City and its staff for their assistance, professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation.
7 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Hughson User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C. Full cost recovery is determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimates for each service rendered were obtained through interviews conducted with City staff for each department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The City’s current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in this section, as well, for reference.
It is important to note that the time data used to determine the amount of time each employee spends assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential in identifying the total cost of providing each service and will differ from City to City depending on staffing, positions involved, experience of staff, the use of consultants, and the policies and procedures in place for each City.
Specifically, in providing services, a number of employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.
The primary goal of this study was to identify the cost of City services, to provide information to help the City make informed decisions regarding the actual fee levels and charges. The responsibility of determining the final fee levels is a complicated task. City staff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.
City staff assumes the responsibility to develop specific fee level recommendations to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Hughson, and administrative and political discretion.
However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the service solely benefits one end user or the general community.
Subsidization
Recalling the definition of a user fee helps guide decisions regarding subsidization. The general standard is that individuals (or groups) who receive a wholly private benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of the services. In contrast, services that are simply public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund’s tax dollars. Unfortunately, for the decision makers, some services fall into the range between these two extremes.
Further complicating the decision, opponents of fees often assert that the activities subject to the fees provide economic, cultural, “quality of life,” or other community benefits that exceed the costs to the City, but it is important to distinguish the difference between any purported possible benefits that may be conveyed through the result of activities of the service receiver and the direct benefit being conveyed through the City providing the service to the requestor.
It is recommended the City consider such factors during its deliberations regarding appropriate fee levels.
8 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Of course, subsidization can be an effective public policy tool since it can be used to reduce fees to encourage certain activities (such as to ensure public safety) or allow some people to be able to afford to receive services they otherwise could not at the full cost. In addition, subsidies can be an appropriate and justifiable action, such as to allow citizens to rightfully access services, without overburdensome costs.
Despite the intent, it is important for the City and public to understand that subsidies must be covered by another revenue source, typically the General Fund’s other unrestricted funds.
Revenue Analysis
The revenue analysis of this User Fee Study Report is intended to provide additional context as a projection of what the fee changes will have in revenue, assuming no participation changes in service requests. The projections are based on the average fee change for each department and evaluates the projected revenue change resulting from suggested fees.
Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (higher fees) will eventually curtail the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and encourage certain actions. Either of these conditions may be a desirable effect to the City. However, the level of the fees that would cause demand changes is largely unknown. The cost of service study did not attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impacts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.
Summary
City staff is recommending setting user fees at suggested fee amounts as detailed in Appendix C. City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, policy initiatives, past performance, implementation issues, and other internal and external factors should influence staff recommendations and City Council decisions. In this case, the proper identification of additional services (new or existing services) and the update to a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule were the primary objectives of this study. City staff has reviewed the full costs and identified the recommended fee levels for consideration by City Council.
The following sections provide background for each department, division, and fee group and the results of this study’s analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee’s analysis, refer to Appendix C of this report.
Department/Fund
FY 2024-25
Budgeted Fee
Revenue
Projected
Revenue from
Suggested Fees
Estimated
Revenue
Change
100: FINANCE 23,300 24,535 1,235
100: PARKS AND RECREATION 15,000 15,219 219
100: PLANNING/BUILDING 348,500 590,173 241,673
270: COMMUNITY/SENIOR CENTER 15,000 17,317 2,317
9 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation brings the community together focusing on providing ways to connect, including free and low-cost events, activities, and classes for all ages. From sports, arts, and STEM to family-friendly gatherings and Parks After Dark, creating more opportunities to bring the community together.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Parks and Recreation Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of most Parks and Recreation programs encompassed facility rentals and other recreation services. The fee for use for government owned facilities and property can be set discretionally by the City, typically based on past usage characteristics, policy goals, and surrounding jurisdiction comparison. The cost of capital acquisition, maintenance, repair, and upgrade to the City and subsequently the public is offset through rental or use fees. As such these fees should be set using the knowledge of activity use for the facilities, policy desires of the City, and market factors when desirable. It is generally accepted that some Parks and Recreation programs provide a measure of public benefit to the residents and City as a whole, and as such is it common for services to bear significant subsidies. In addition, cities generally want to ensure that their programs and services remain affordable to the community at large, and that the programs remain competitive with surrounding jurisdictions. For a few of the fees in Parks and Recreation a standard cost of service approach was used, but some of the additional cost considerations above were not included as this is primarily an operational cost analysis study that does not include considerations for capital. The analysis found that the current fees for facility use and services are below the cost of providing them. The analysis also included a cost recovery analysis for Parks and Recration as a whole and it was determined to be operating at around 4% cost recovery overall. The suggested fees detailed in Appendix C. would result in:
An increase for 28 fees, and;
the remaining fees would remain as currently set.
10 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Business License
The Finance Department functions as a coordinating link between all city departments and with agencies and individuals in the public and private sectors regarding all financial issues of the City of Hughson. The Finance department handles the Business License services.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with Business License. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of the Business License services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for fees, excluding fees set by the State, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved with providing the service to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most current fees are currently below the full cost of providing services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
An increase to 6 fees;
1 fee would decrease;
8 fees would remain as currently set, and;
the average fee change would be an increase of 5% for current fees.
11 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Building
The Building Division manages all work associated with processing building plans and permits. For all work including tenant improvements in a commercial building to remodels, additions, pools, patios for residential homes, a building permit is required. Division staff, in coordination with the City’s contract consultant, CSG Consultants, carries out plan review, building inspection, permit processing and building code interpretation, as well as providing advice and guidance for applicants.
CSG Consultants is responsible for the review of submitted project plans to ensure compliance with the State of California Building Code, as well as the City’s ordinances and regulations. This includes building code compliance inspections throughout construction of permitted projects, alterations or repairs to enforce the requirements of the City’s and State’s codes.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Building Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of Building services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that services are currently below the full cost of providing them. It is recommended that the City increase cost recovery to or near 100% for Community Development services as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
An increase to 39 fees;
3 new fees will be added;
6 fees would decrease;
13 fees would remain as currently set, and;
the average fee change would be an increase of 107% for current fees.
In addition to the above referenced fees listed under Building, the Building Permit fees are also provided by this division. For the Building Permit fees, valuation is used as a proxy for measuring the effort needed to provide services on a case-by-case basis. This method is an industry standard widely used by other jurisdictions to evaluate the cost of providing service. It is generally understood that the larger and more complex a project is, the more time and effort that is required to provide the service. Project valuation also follows that trend. By using a combination of either project valuation or historical revenue figures along with a multiplier or cost recovery analysis for historical and anticipated future trends, current cost recovery along with variability in charges due to project type and scale is determined. The result of the cost analysis completed for the Building Permit program found that the program is currently operating at 58% cost recovery based on average activity level for fiscal year 2022-2024. Staff is recommending that the fees be increased to 100% cost recovery as detailed in Appendix C.
12 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Planning
The Planning Division is responsible for administering the city’s land use planning and entitlement process as well as managing, implementing and when necessary, updating the General Plan. The General Plan looks decades into the future and provides the fundamental basis for the City’s land use and development policy and represents the basic community values, ideals and aspirations over this time.
Planning serves as the first stop for development proposals of any kind and provides assistance to developers, architects, builders, business owners and residents seeking approval of their development application.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Planning Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.
The analysis of Planning services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most of the current fees are underfunding the cost of services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
An increase to 2 fees;
1 fee would decrease;
60 fees would remain as currently set, and;
the average fee change would be an increase of 4%.
13 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Code Enforcement
Code Enforcement oversees enforcement complaints, weed abatement, graffiti abatement, vehicle abatement and common code violations.
Analysis
No analysis was made of the Code Enforcement violations and they are recommended to remain as currently set.
14 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs that may be recovered through User Fees; however, only a portion of the total allowable cost is recovered as staff not only works on services related to User Fees but also works on an array of other City functions during the operational hours of the City. The amounts listed below will not reconcile to City budgets as costs that should not be included in overhead for personnel in the application of determining fully burdened hourly rates were excluded. Examples of these costs are capital, debt, monetary transfers, contract costs, and any other costs that are charged directly to the service requestor.
City of Hughson - User Fee Study
Overhead Rate Calculations
Department
Total Personnel
Services
Department
Operations &
Administration
Direct
Overhead
%
Indirect
Allocation
%
100: BUILDING AND GROUNDS 80,944 38,600 48% 0%
100: CITY CLERK 59,642 33,650 56% 0%
100: CITY MANAGER 223,250 19,932 9% 0%
100: FINANCE 309,290 53,370 17% 0%
100: PARKS AND RECREATION 120,982 44,825 37% 51%
100: PLANNING/BUILDING 149,435 12,400 8% 24%
100: PUBLIC WORKS 56,904 21,280 37% 26%
100: STREET MAINTENANCE 100,395 28,900 29% 40%
210: SEWER 559,332 383,100 68% 20%
240: WATER 623,954 358,951 58% 13%
15 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix B –Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix C. The FBHRs were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs for each position as well as all applicable overhead amounts for each position. When a central service department position works on a fee or project in the purview of an operating department, the overhead rates of the operating department (shown in Appendix A) will be applied to that central service positions’ salary and benefit rate for full cost recovery since indirect overhead cost only applies to non-central service functions of the City. For any user fee service request that is outside the scope of the fees detailed in Appendix C, or for services for which there is no fee currently set, the City can charge up to the full cost of the FBHR for personnel involved.
City of Hughson - User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
100: CITY CLERK Clerk - City Clerk $113.08
100: CITY MANAGER CM - City Manager $142.56
100: FINANCE Finance - Accounting Manager $97.65
100: FINANCE Finance - Accounting Technician II $65.02
100: FINANCE Finance - City Clerk $84.77
100: FINANCE Finance - Customer Service Clerk $36.86
100: FINANCE Finance - Finance/AS Director $134.83
100: BUILDING AND GROUNDS Grounds - Maint Wkr I $61.51
100: BUILDING AND GROUNDS Grounds - Maint Wkr II $88.50 100: BUILDING AND GROUNDS Grounds - Maint Wkr II $92.90 100: BUILDING AND GROUNDS Grounds - Maintenance Worker I $54.70 100: BUILDING AND GROUNDS Grounds - Senior Maint Worker $95.00 100: PARKS AND RECREATION Parks - Maint Wkr I $86.31
100: PARKS AND RECREATION Parks - Maint Wkr II $124.19
100: PARKS AND RECREATION Parks - Maint Wkr II $130.37
100: PARKS AND RECREATION Parks - Maintenance Worker I $76.75 100: PARKS AND RECREATION Parks - PW Superintendent $175.43 100: PARKS AND RECREATION Parks - PW Superintendent - 25% Interim $35.91 100: PARKS AND RECREATION Parks - Senior Maint Worker $133.32 100: PLANNING/BUILDING Plng/Bldg - Community Development Dir $149.90 100: PLANNING/BUILDING Plng/Bldg - Community Development Specialist $76.10 100: PLANNING/BUILDING Plng/Bldg - Management Analyst $80.06 100: PUBLIC WORKS PW - Community Development Dir $193.14 100: PUBLIC WORKS PW - Community Development Specialist $98.05 100: PUBLIC WORKS PW - Maintenance Worker I $63.88
100: PUBLIC WORKS PW - PW Superintendent $146.00
16 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Hughson - User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
100: PUBLIC WORKS PW - PW Superintendent - 25% Interim $29.89 210: SEWER Sewer - Accounting Manager $167.70
210: SEWER Sewer - Accounting Technician II $111.66
210: SEWER Sewer - Community Development Dir $225.50
210: SEWER Sewer - Community Development Specialist $114.48 210: SEWER Sewer - Customer Service Clerk $63.30
210: SEWER Sewer - Maint Wkr II $120.67
210: SEWER Sewer - Maintenance Worker I $74.58
210: SEWER Sewer - Management Analyst $120.44
210: SEWER Sewer - PW Superintendent $170.46
210: SEWER Sewer - PW Superintendent - 25% Interim $34.90 210: SEWER Sewer - Senior Maint Worker $129.54
210: SEWER Sewer - Senior Utility Worker $81.04
210: SEWER Sewer - Utility Worker I/II $73.08
210: SEWER Sewer - Water Distribution Operator I $93.14 210: SEWER Sewer - Water Distribution Operator II $112.53 210: SEWER Sewer - WWTP Operator I $73.69
100: STREET MAINTENANCE Street - Maint Wkr II $108.29
100: STREET MAINTENANCE Street - Maintenance Worker I $66.92 100: STREET MAINTENANCE Street - PW Superintendent $152.96 100: STREET MAINTENANCE Street - PW Superintendent - 25% Interim $31.32 100: STREET MAINTENANCE Street - Senior Maint Worker $116.24 240: WATER Water - Accounting Manager $147.60
240: WATER Water - Accounting Technician II $98.27
240: WATER Water - Community Development Dir $198.47
240: WATER Water - Community Development Specialist $100.75 240: WATER Water - Customer Service Clerk $55.71
240: WATER Water - Maint Wkr II $106.21
240: WATER Water - Maintenance Worker I $65.64
240: WATER Water - Management Analyst $106.00
240: WATER Water - PW Superintendent $150.02
240: WATER Water - PW Superintendent - 25% Interim $30.71 240: WATER Water - Senior Maint Worker $114.01
240: WATER Water - Senior Utility Worker $71.32
240: WATER Water - Utility Worker I/II $64.32
240: WATER Water - Water Distribution Operator I $81.98 240: WATER Water - Water Distribution Operator II $99.04 240: WATER Water - WWTP Operator I $67.50
17 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the analysis, calculated full cost recovery amount, and recommended fees. For fees, services, and penalties in which the full cost, existing fee, and suggested fee is listed as “NA”, the amount or percentage was not calculable. This is most common when either the current or the suggested fee includes a variable component that is not comparable on a one-to-one basis, a full cost was not calculated (for penalties, fines, market-based fees, or items not included in the study), or when there is not a current fee amount to compare against.
Parks & Recreation
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 ROLAND STARN PARK2 Rental and Use of Field by Local Users $30.00 for three hours $84.40 64% $30.00 $03 Rental and Use of Field by Non-Local Users $60.00 for three hours $84.40 29% $60.00 $04 Rental and Use of Field by Local Nonprofit Users $20.00 for three hours $84.40 76% $20.00 $05 Rental and Use of Field by Non-Local Nonprofit Users $50.00 for three hours $84.40 29% $60.00 $106 Rental and Use of Facility for Tournament by Local Users $125.00 per day NA NA $125.00 $07 Rental and Use of Facility for Tournament by Non-Local Users $250.00 per day NA NA $250.00 $0 8 Rental and Use of Concession Stand $25.00 per day $117.86 79% $25.00 $0 9 Rental and Use of Concession Stand combined with field or BBQ Area Rental $15.00 per day $117.86 87% $15.00 $010 Rental and Use of Large Covered BBQ Area $50.00 per day $117.86 49% $60.00 $10 11 Rental and Use of Small Covered BBQ Area $35.00 per day $117.86 66% $40.00 $5 12 Rental and Use of Small Covered BBQ Areas (two available) $30.00 per day $117.86 70% $35.00 $5 13 Rental and Use of the Entire park by Local Users $150.00 per day $184.79 19% $150.00 $0 14 Rental and Use of the Entire park by Non-Local Users $250.00 per day NA NA $250.00 $015 Fee for Use of Ball Field Lights $23.00 per hour $84.40 73% $23.00 $0 16 Refundable Damage Deposit Required for All Users $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $017 Additional Damage Deposit for Concession Stand $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $0 18 LEBRIGHT FIELDS19 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Local Users $15.00 for three hours $84.40 82% $15.00 $0 20 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Non-Local Users $30.00 for three hours $84.40 64% $30.00 $0 21 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Local Nonprofit Users $10.00 for three hours $84.40 88% $10.00 $022 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Non-Local Nonprofit Users $20.00 for three hours $84.40 76% $20.00 $0 23 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Local Users $10.00 for three hours $84.40 88% $10.00 $0 24 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Non-Local Users $20.00 for three hours $84.40 76% $20.00 $0 25 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Local Nonprofit Users $5.00 for three hours $84.40 94% $5.00 $026 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Non-Local Nonprofit Users $10.00 for three hours $84.40 88% $10.00 $0 27 Rental and Use for Tournament by Local Users $75.00 per day $84.40 11% $75.00 $028 Rental and Use for Tournament by Non-Local Users $150.00 per day NA NA $150.00 $029 Rental and Use for Tournament by Local Non-Profit Users $50.00 per day $84.40 41% $50.00 $0 30 Rental and Use for Tournament by Non-Local Non-Profit Users $100.00 per day NA NA $100.00 $0 31 Rental and Use by Hughson Youth Baseball Association (January 1 through July 31) $200.00 per month NA NA $200.00 $032 Rental and Use of the Concession Stand $50.00 per day $117.86 58% $50.00 $0 18
Renter Classification Monday-Friday Monday-Friday Saturday or Sunday Damage Deposit 7:00am-5:00pm 5:00pm-11:00pm 7:00am-11:00pm
Rental Rate Rental Rate Rental Rate
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area N/A $200.00 $300.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area N/A $300.00 $400.00 $500.00
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events (Minimum of 4 hours Monday - Friday) Hughson Svc Area $25.00 $25.00 $300.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area $35.00 $35.00 $400.00 $500.00
C. City -sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
D. United Samaritan Foundation Sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Agreement
Renter Classification Monday-Friday Monday-Friday Saturday or Sunday Damage Deposit 7:00am-5:00pm 5:00pm-11:00pm 7:00am-11:00pm
Rental Rate Rental Rate Rental Rate
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area N/A $200.00 $300.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area N/A $300.00 $400.00 $500.00
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events (Minimum of 4 hours Monday - Friday) Hughson Svc Area $25.00 $25.00 $300.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area $35.00 $35.00 $400.00 $500.00
C. City -sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
D. United Samaritan Foundation Sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Agreement
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
UNITED SAMARITAN FOUNDATION COMMUNITY CENTER SUGGESTED FEE SCHEDULE
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
CITY OF HUGHSON
UNITED SAMARITAN FOUNDATION COMMUNITY CENTER CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE 19
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate Damage Deposit (Mon-Thrus) (Fri-Sun)
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area $150.00 $500.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area $175.00 $600.00 $500.00
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate
Damage Deposit &
Mopping Fee
(Mon-Thrus) (Fri-Sun)
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events
Hughson Svc Area $75.00 $75.00 $330.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $330.00
C. Clubs/Organizations
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $150.00 $300.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $300.00
D. Youth Groups
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $150.00 $330.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $330.00
E. Governmetnal Svcs
City of Hughson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Other Agencies $100.00 $125.00 $330.00
Hughson Schools $75.00 $100.00 $330.00
F. City -sponsored Events $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
G. Religious Events
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $150.00 $330.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $330.00
H. City Agreement
J. Non-profit $15.00 per use $25.00
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate Damage Deposit (Mon-Thrus) (Fri-Sun)
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area $175.00 $600.00 $600.00
Outside Svc Area $200.00 $700.00 $600.00
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate
Damage Deposit &
Mopping Fee
(Mon-Thrus) (Fri-Sun)
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events
Hughson Svc Area $75.00 $100.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $375.00
C. Clubs/Organizations
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $200.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $250.00 $375.00
D. Youth Groups
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $200.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $250.00 $375.00
E. Governmetnal Svcs
City of Hughson
Other Agencies $100.00 $125.00 $375.00
Hughson Schools $75.00 $100.00 $375.00
F. City -sponsored Events
G. Religious Events
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $200.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $175.00 $250.00 $375.00
H. City Agreement
J. Non-profit $15.00 per use $25.00
COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER SUGGESTED FEE SCHEDULE
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
20
Business License
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Boxing and wrestling matches $100.00 per exhibition NA NA $100.00 $02 Carnivals, circuses and traveling shows $100.00 per day NA NA $100.00 $03 Dances, at which admission is charged $50.00 each NA NA $50.00 $04 Peddling or soliciting $20.00 per day NA NA $20.00 $0 5 Selling bankrupt, depreciated, or damaged stock or goods, when the same are represented as being sold for less than the usual course of business $200.00 per quarter NA NA $200.00 $06 Trucks using City Streets, which are not exempt $25.00 per quarter NA NA $25.00 $07 Garage sales - not to exceed 2 consecutive days $5.00 $9.21 24% $7.00 $2 8 Garage sales - each second or subsequent sale withing any calendar year $30.00 $10.00 0% $10.00 -$20 9 Bars $250.00 per year NA NA $250.00 $0
10 Any establishment selling liquor at which dancing occurs - in addition to any other license tax prescribed for such business $200.00 NA NA $200.00 $011 Mobile groceries (Taco Wagons, Sandwich Wagons or any mobile vehicle dispensing sandwiches, etc $100.00 $186.75 20% $150.00 $50 12 Contracts and subcontractors $25.00 per quarter $74.91 51% $37.00 $12 13 Any other business owned or operated by a person having no fixed or permanent place in the City $25.00 per quarter $186.75 80% $37.00 $12 14 Every person engaged in business within the City who has a fixed or permanent place of business in the City, except those businesses otherwise provided for above - 0-5 full time employees $9.00 per quarter $186.75 93% $13.00 $4
15 Every person engaged in business within the City who has a fixed or permanent place of business in the City, except those businesses otherwise provided for above - 6 or more full time employees additional $2.50 per full time employee per quarter $186.75 98% $3.00 $1 21
Building
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Notes Fee Δ 1 Grading and Excavation Permit Fees (GEPF)
GEPF’s do not include Grading Plan check fees. Separate permits may be required by Public Works and Engineering. 2 GEPF - All Projects
3 50 to 400 cubic yards $89.50 $311.28 0% $311.00 $222
4 401-1,000 cubic yards $89.50
for the first 400 cubic yards plus $17.50 for each additional cubic yards or fraction thereof $311.28 0% $311.00 $222
5 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $194.50
for the first 1,000 cubic yards plus $14.50 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof $537.24 0% $537.00 $343
6 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $325.00
for the first 10,000 cubic yards plus $14.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof $763.21 0% $763.00 $438
7 100,001 cubic yards or more $919.00
for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $14.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof $763.21 0% $763.00 -$156
8 Re-Roof Permit Fee (RRPF)9 BLDGP - All Buildings10 $1 to $7,000 $153.25 $207.83 0% $207.00 $54 11 $7,001 to $25,000 $153.25
for the first $7000 plus $14.00
for each additional $1000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $207.68 0% $207.00 $54
12 $25,001 to $75,000 $405.25
for the first $25,000 plus $10.10 for each additional $1000 or fraction thereof, to and including $75,000 $207.68 0% $207.00 -$198
13 $75,001 and greater see BPF Schedule NA NA see BPF Schedule $0 14 Swimming Pool Permit Fee (SPPF)
SPPF’s do not include Plan check fee, Electrical, Plumbing fee, or Mechanical fee. 15 BLDGP - In Ground16 $1 to $25,000 $391.25 $800.78 0% $800.00 $409 17 $25,001 to $50,000 $391.25
for the first $25,000 plus $10.10 for each additional $1000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $800.78 0% $800.00 $409
18 $50,001 and greater see BPF Schedule NA NA see BPF Schedule $0 19 Accessory Building Permit Fee (SPPF)
ABPF do not include Plan check fee or applicable Electrical fee, Plumbing fee, or Mechanical fee. 20 BLDGP - Utility21 $1 to $8,000 $153.25 $528.51 0% $528.00 $375 22 $8,001 and greater see BPF Schedule NA NA see BPF Schedule $023 Patio Cover Permit Fee (PCPF) PCPF’s do not include Plan check fee or applicable Electrical fee. 24 BLDGP - Residential25 $1 to $8,000 $153.25 $528.51 0% $528.00 $37526 $8,001 and greater see BPF Schedule NA NA see BPF Schedule $027 Demolition Permit Fee (DPF) 22
Building
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Notes Fee Δ 28 DPF - All Structures (Including Inspection) $173.50 $207.68 0% $207.00 $3429 Electrical Permit Fee (EPF)30 EPF1 - Residential 1 & 2 Family Dwellings $0.10 per sq ft minimum fee $85.00 $0.18 0% $0.18 minimum fee $153.00 $0.08 31 EPF2 - Multi Family/Commercial $0.12 per sq ft minimum fee $85.00 $0.18 0% $0.18 minimum fee $153.00 $0.06 32 EPF3 - Swimming Pools (Residential) $91.20 $330.05 0% $330.00 $23933 EPF4 - Electric Meter Tag (includes 1 inspection) $85.00 $207.68 0% $207.00 $122 34 Mechanical Permit Fee (MPF)35 MPF1 - Residential 1 & 2 Family Dwellings $0.06 per sq ft minimum fee $85.00 $0.08 0% $0.08 minimum fee $153.00 $0.02 36 MPF2 - Multi Family/Commercial $0.08 per sq ft minimum fee $85.00 $0.08 0% $0.08 minimum fee $153.00 $0.00 37 MPF3 - Swimming Pools (Residential) Project Specific NA NA Project Specific $0 38 Plumbing Permit Fee (PPF)39 PPF1 - Residential 1 & 2 Family Dwellings $0.12 per sq ft minimum fee $85.00 $0.08 0% $0.08 minimum fee $58.00 -$0.04 40 PPF2 - Multi Family/Commercial $0.14 per sq ft minimum fee $85.00 $0.08 0% $0.08 minimum fee $58.00 -$0.06 41 PPF3 - Swimming Pools (Residential) $94.00 $207.68 0% $207.00 $11342 PPF4 - Gas Meter Tag (includes 1 inspection) $85.00 $207.68 0% $207.00 $122 43 Plan Check Fee (PCF)44 PCF1 - All Structures 65% of Permit Fee NA NA 75% of Permit Fee 10% 45 PCF2 - Grading/Excavation (1 hour minimum) $95.00 per hour $311.28 0% $311.00 $216 46 PCF3 - Fire Prevention $110.00 per hour $85.31 0% $85.00 -$25 47 PCF4 - Energy or Accessibility Compliance $85.00 per hour $207.68 0% $207.00 $122 48 PCF5 - Additional Plan Review $85.00 per hour $357.58 0% $357.00 $27249 PCF6 - Additional Plan Review (changes, modifications to approved plans) $95.00 per hour $357.58 0% $357.00 $262 50 PCF7 - Plan Review Fee New SFD Subdivision (Each Permit) 20% of Permit Fee NA NA 20% of Permit Fee $051 PCF8 - Master Plan Check Fee New SFD Subdivision $0.65 per sq ft $629.84 0% $629.00 $62852 Certificate of Occupancy Fee (COF)53 COF - All Building (each occupancy) $38.00 $38.05 100% -$3854 Strong Motion Instrumentation Program Fee (SMIF)55 SMIP1 - Residential $0.00010 x valuation minimum fee $0.50 NA NA $0.00010 x valuation minimum fee $0.50 $056 SMIP2 - Commercial $0.00021 x valuation minimum fee $0.50 NA NA $0.00021 x valuation minimum fee $0.50 $057 Green Building Standards Fee 58 GBS - All (Based on Valuation)59 $1-$25,000 $1.00 NA NA $1.00 $0 60 $25,001-$50,000 $2.00 NA NA $2.00 $0
61 $50,001-$75,000 $3.00 NA NA $3.00 $0
62 $75,001-$100,000 $4.00 NA NA $4.00 $0
63 Per $25,000 or fraction thereof above $1.00 NA NA $1.00 $0 64 Administrative Services Fee (ASF)65 ASF1 - Permit Replacement fee $36.25 $76.10 0% $76.00 $4066 ASF2 - Building Permit Extension Fee $36.25 $85.31 0% $85.00 $49 67 ASF3 - Building Permit Expiration Fee $36.25 plus permit costs $85.31 0% $85.00 $49 68 ASF4 - Building Permit Application Extension Fee $36.25 $85.31 0% $85.00 $4969 ASF5 - Property Lien $85.00 $321.73 0% $321.00 $23670 ASF6 - Property Lien Removal $85.00 $245.63 0% $245.00 $160 71 ASF7 - Filing and Recording Fee $85.00 $245.63 0% $245.00 $160 72 Miscellaneous Fees73 MSF1 - Field Inspection Fee (1 hour minimum) $85.00 per hour $169.63 0% $169.00 $8474 MSF2 - Field Inspection Fee (Outside business hours-2 hour Minimum) $128.00 per hour $230.82 0% $230.00 $102 75 MSF3 - Re-inspection Fee $85.00 $169.63 0% $169.00 $8476 MSF4 - Investigation Fee (Work without a Permit, misc. violations) $152.00 $167.16 0% $167.00 $1577 MSF5 - Code Violation Fee (Work without a Permit, misc. violations) Double Fee minimum Fee $194.50 $228.34 0% Double Fee minimum Fee $228 $34 23
Building
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Notes Fee Δ 78 MSF6 - Business License Inspection (Includes 1 inspection) $85.00 $178.85 0% $178.00 $9379 MSF7 – Notice and Posting Fee $95.00 $235.36 0% $235.00 $14079 City Planning Questions New $198.46 0% $198.00 NA 79 Planning Commission items New $635.48 0% $635.00 NA
79 Parks Rec and Entertainment New $268.38 0% $268.00 NA 24
Minimum Value Maximum Value
Current Base
Rate
Suggested
Base Rate
Current
Plus $$
Suggested
Plus $$ For every
1.00 4,000.00 97.25 166.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
4,001.00 25,000.00 97.25 166.31 14.00 23.94 1,000.00
25,001.00 50,000.00 391.25 669.08 10.10 17.27 1,000.00
50,001.00 100,000.00 643.75 1,100.89 7.00 11.97 1,000.00 100,001.00 500,000.00 993.75 1,699.43 5.60 9.58 1,000.00 500,001.00 1,000,000.00 3,233.75 5,530.09 4.75 8.12 1,000.00 100,000,001.00 and up 5,608.75 9,591.62 3.15 5.39 1,000.00 Percent Change = 71%
Cost Recovery Level = 100%
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
25
Planning
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 a) Variance $945.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $945.00 Deposit $02 b) Reclassification or text amendment $618.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $618.00 Deposit $03 c) Conditional Use Permit $945.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $945.00 Deposit $04 d) Zone Change (Rezone or Prezone) $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 5 I. Environmental Review $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 6 II. SB 18 Tribal Consultation fee if necessary $145.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $145.00 Deposit $07 III. Total Zone change $2,843.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $2,843.00 Deposit $0 8 e) Development Agreement $1,999.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,999.00 Deposit $0 9 f) Planned Development Overlay Zone $1,999.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,999.00 Deposit $0 10 g) General Plan Amendment, map or text $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 11 I. Environmental Review $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 12 II. SB 18 Tribal Consultation fee, if necessary $145.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $145.00 Deposit $013 III. Total General Plan Amendment $2,843.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $2,843.00 Deposit $0 14 h) Annexation $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $5,000.00 Deposit $3,651 15 I. Environmental Review $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 16 II. SB 18 Tribal Consultation fee, if necessary $145.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $145.00 Deposit $0 17 III. Development Agreement $1,999.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,999.00 Deposit $0 18 IV. LAFCO fee $2,500.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $2,500.00 Deposit $0 19 V. Total Annexation $7,342.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $7,342.00 Deposit $0 20 i) Appeal $444.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $444.00 Deposit $0 26
Planning
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 21 j) Reversion to acreage $537.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $537.00 Deposit $022 k) Merger $537.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $537.00 Deposit $023 l) Sign Review $155.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $155.00 Deposit $024 m) Petition of affected owners At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA At Cost + Admin Charge $0 25 n) Secondary Dwelling Unit $408.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $408.00 Deposit $026 o) EE review, inspection of improvement Time + Material NA NA Time + Material $027 p) Time Extension $408.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $408.00 Deposit $0 28 q) Preliminary & Final water/sewer inspection $358.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $358.00 Deposit $0 29 r) Parcel & Final Map $852.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $852.00 Deposit $0 30 I. Development Agreement $1,999.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,999.00 Deposit $0 31 II. Environmental Review $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 32 III. Total Parcel Map & Final Map $4,200.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $4,200.00 Deposit $0 33 s) Tentative Map $1,954.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,954.00 Deposit $0 34 I. Development Map $1,999.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,999.00 Deposit $0 35 II. Environmental Review $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 36 Total Tentative Map $5,302.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $5,302.00 Deposit $0 37 t) Tentative Map $1,954.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,954.00 Deposit $0 38 III. Development Map $1,999.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,999.00 Deposit $0 39 IV. Environmental Review $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 40 Total Tentative Map $5,302.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $5,302.00 Deposit $0 27
Planning
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 41 u) Lot Line Adjustment $537.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $537.00 Deposit $042 v) Environmental Impact Report $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 43 I. Dept. of Fish & Game Fee $2,606.75 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $2,606.75 Deposit $0 44 II. Filing Notice of Determination $57.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $57.00 Deposit $045 III. Total Environmental Impact Report $4,012.75 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $4,012.75 Deposit $0 46 w) Filing Notice of Determination $155.00
Deposit + $57 Filing Fee
At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $155.00
Deposit + $57 Filing Fee
$0
47 x) Initial Study $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 48 y) Negative Declaration $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 49 I. Dept. of Fish & Game Fee $1,876.75 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,876.75 Deposit $0 50 II. Filing Notice of Determination $57.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $57.00 Deposit $051 III. Total Negative Declaration $3,282.75 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $3,282.75 Deposit $0 52 z) Encroachment Permit $290.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $290.00 Deposit $0 53 aa) Advisory Meeting $466.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $466.00 Deposit $054 bb) Home Relocation/Building Move $823.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $823.00 Deposit $055 cc) Street Closure $207.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $207.00 Deposit $056 dd) Minor Variance $491.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $491.00 Deposit $0 57 ee) Development Review $1,122.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,122.00 Deposit $0 58 ff) Specific Plan $1,349.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $1,349.00 Deposit $0 59 gg) Administrative Permit/ Ministerial Review $222.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $222.00 Deposit $0 28
Planning
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 60 hh) Zoning Clearance $269.00 Deposit At Cost + Admin Charge NA NA $269.00 Deposit $061 ii) Notice to affected owners $202.00 $190.24 0% $190.00 plus postage costs
-$12
62 uu) Home Occupation permit $100.00 $149.86 1% $149.00 $49 63 vv) Services Not Specifically Mentioned Staff Hourly Costs NA NA Staff Hourly Costs $0 *Additional 15% Admin Charge Fee
29
Building/Code Enforcement
Item
No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Fines2 Level “A” Violations $1,000.00 NA NA $1,000.00 $0 3 Level “B” Violations $500.00 NA NA $500.00 $04 Level “C” Violations (includes violations classified as misdemeanors) NA NA 5 I. 1st violation $250.00 NA NA $250.00 $06 II. 2nd & Subsequent violations w/in 12 months $1,000.00 NA NA $1,000.00 $0 7 Level “D” Building Code or Safety Code violations classified as infractions NA NA 8 1st violation $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $0
9 2nd violation w/in 12 months $500.00 NA NA $500.00 $0 10 3rd and subsequent violations w/in 12 months $1,000.00 NA NA $1,000.00 $011 Level “D” General Violations classified as infractions NA NA12 1st violation $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $0 13 2nd violation w/in 12 months $200.00 NA NA $200.00 $014 3rd and subsequent violations w/in 12 months $500.00 NA NA $500.00 $015 Late Payments 10% per month, simple interest NA NA 10% per month, simple interest
$0
30
Parks & Recreation
Item
No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Suggested Fee Fee Δ
1 ROLLAND STARN PARK
2 Rental and Use of Field by Local Users $30.00 for three hours $30.00 $0 3 Rental and Use of Field by Non-Local Users $60.00 for three hours $60.00 $0 4 Rental and Use of Field by Local Nonprofit Users $20.00 for three hours $20.00 $0 5 Rental and Use of Field by Non-Local Nonprofit Users $50.00 for three hours $40.00 -$10 6 Rental and Use of Facility for Tournament by Local Users $125.00 per day $125.00 $0 7 Rental and Use of Facility for Tournament by Non-Local Users $250.00 per day $250.00 $0 8 Rental and Use of Concession Stand $25.00 per day $50.00 $25 9 Rental and Use of Concession Stand combined with field or BBQ Area Rental $15.00 per day $30.00 $15 10 Rental and Use of Large Covered BBQ Area $50.00 per day $100.00 $50 11 Rental and Use of Small Covered BBQ Area $35.00 per day $70.00 $35 12 Rental and Use of Small Covered BBQ Areas (two available) $30.00 per day $30.00 $0 13 Rental and Use of the Entire park by Local Users $150.00 per day $300.00 $150 14 Rental and Use of the Entire park by Non-Local Users $250.00 per day $500.00 $250 15 Fee for Use of Ball Field Lights $23.00 per hour $75.00 $52 16 Refundable Damage Deposit Required for All Users $100.00 $100.00 $0 17 Additional Damage Deposit for Concession Stand $100.00 $100.00 $0 18 LEBRIGHT FIELDS
19 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Local Users $15.00 for three hours $30.00 $15 20 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Non-Local Users $30.00 for three hours $60.00 $30 21 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Local Nonprofit Users $10.00 for three hours $20.00 $10 22 Rental and Use of Field No. 1 by Non-Local Nonprofit Users $20.00 for three hours $40.00 $20 23 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Local Users $10.00 for three hours $30.00 $20 24 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Non-Local Users $20.00 for three hours $60.00 $40 25 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Local Nonprofit Users $5.00 for three hours $20.00 $15 26 Rental and Use of Fields No. 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 by Non-Local Nonprofit Users $10.00 for three hours $40.00 $30 27 Rental and Use for Tournament by Local Users $75.00 per day $250.00 $175 28 Rental and Use for Tournament by Non-Local Users $150.00 per day $500.00 $350 29 Rental and Use for Tournament by Local Non-Profit Users $50.00 per day $250.00 $200 30 Rental and Use for Tournament by Non-Local Non-Profit Users $100.00 per day $500.00 $400 31 Rental and Use by Hughson Youth Baseball Association (January 1 through July 31) $200.00 per month $200.00 $0 32 Rental and Use of the Concession Stand $50.00 per day $50.00 $0
Renter Classification Monday-Friday Monday-Friday Saturday or Sunday Damage Deposit 7:00am-5:00pm 5:00pm-11:00pm 7:00am-11:00pm
Rental Rate Rental Rate Rental Rate
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area N/A $200.00 $300.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area N/A $300.00 $400.00 $500.00
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events (Minimum of 4 hours Monday - Friday) Hughson Svc Area $25.00 $25.00 $300.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area $35.00 $35.00 $400.00 $500.00
C. City -sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
D. United Samaritan Foundation Sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Agreement
Renter Classification Monday-Friday Monday-Friday Saturday or Sunday Damage Deposit 7:00am-5:00pm 5:00pm-11:00pm 7:00am-11:00pm
Rental Rate Rental Rate Rental Rate
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area N/A $255.00 $385.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area N/A $385.00 $510.00 $500.00
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events (Minimum of 4 hours Monday - Friday) Hughson Svc Area $25.00 $30.00 $385.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area $35.00 $45.00 $540.00 $500.00
C. City -sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
D. United Samaritan Foundation Sponsored Event $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Agreement
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
UNITED SAMARITAN FOUNDATION COMMUNITY CENTER SUGGESTED FEE SCHEDULE
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
CITY OF HUGHSON
UNITED SAMARITAN FOUNDATION COMMUNITY CENTER CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate Damage Deposit (Mon-Thurs) (Fri-Sun)
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area $150.00 $500.00 $500.00
Outside Svc Area $175.00 $600.00 $500.00
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate
Damage Deposit &
Mopping Fee
(Mon-Thurs) (Fri-Sun)
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events
Hughson Svc Area $75.00 $75.00 $330.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $330.00
C. Clubs/Organizations
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $150.00 $300.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $300.00
D. Youth Groups
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $150.00 $330.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $330.00
E. Governmetnal Svcs
City of Hughson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Other Agencies $100.00 $125.00 $330.00
Hughson Schools $75.00 $100.00 $330.00
F. City -sponsored Events $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
G. Religious Events
Hughson Svc Area $125.00 $150.00 $330.00
Outside Svc Area $150.00 $200.00 $330.00
H. City Agreement
J. Non-profit $15.00 per use $25.00
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate Damage Deposit (Mon-Thrus) (Fri-Sun)
A. Private Groups
Hughson Svc Area $200.00 $750.00 $600.00 incl.mop fee
Outside Svc Area $230.00 $900.00 $600.00 incl.mop fee
Renter Classification Weekday Rate Weekend Rate Damage Deposit (Mon-Thrus) (Fri-Sun)
B. Short-term Meeting/Special Events
Hughson Svc Area $100.00 $100.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $200.00 $265.00 $375.00
C. Clubs/Organizations
Hughson Svc Area $165.00 $200.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $200.00 $265.00 $375.00
D. Youth Groups
Hughson Svc Area $165.00 $200.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $200.00 $265.00 $375.00
E. Governmental Svcs
City of Hughson $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Other Agencies $130.00 $165.00 $375.00
Hughson Schools $100.00 $130.00 $375.00
F. City -sponsored Events
G. Religious Events
Hughson Svc Area $165.00 $200.00 $375.00
Outside Svc Area $200.00 $265.00 $375.00
H. City Agreement
J. Non-profit $20.00 per use $25.00
COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER SUGGESTED FEE SCHEDULE
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
AS SPECIFIED IN INDIVIDUAL AGREEMENTS
COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER CURRENT FEE SCHEDULE