City Council/Public Financing Authority
November 1, 2022

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:13 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda item no. 22-906 Housing Element (11/1/22 city county meeting) Attachments: Aguilar letter to HB council 20221028.pdf
From: Jennifer Aguilar <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:12 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: Agenda item no. 22-906 Housing Element (11/1/22 city county meeting) Please see attached. Thank you!
Jennifer Aguilar 714-803-8540
Sent from my iPhone

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mosiny Dato: 11|1/2022
Apenda Nam No: 3S#4 (22-904)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 246 245 249
Il City Boundary
250 302
E Sites Inventory L 33944838
S248 247) 258
BRICE. Le 127 7182
137
129
1832 - 161,
4126g 231
110 125 160
6131-
184 -2862
254
385 387
386
- 388
391 1189
·3902
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Jennifer Aguilar
Name:

Street Name Only/Email: Ashford Ln/[email protected]
Signature/Initials:
11|1|2072 Agenda Hom No: SS #4 (22-906)
North West er South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Hantington Beach. Holly entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.
character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be Meeting Date:
northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would Irreparably change the more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the developinent of residences at a maximum density of no We ane dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac The Holly- FW: Agenda Item no.22-906 Housing Element
2372053 - Sites Invaron
25C 302 1) Cky Boundary
Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:13 PM 235 2008
agend
39-72 6398
SECS
Fikes, Cathy Agenda Alerts
Figure B-10: 5tte anenbory
So Hang Demen DRAFT
housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Pian (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

From: PETER MACIVER <[email protected]> To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]> Subject: Agenda Item no. 22-906 Housing Element AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element and the proposed high density As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Hurtingion Beach, we are OUTRAGED and Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 12:29 PM
Dear Honorable Mayor Deigleize and members of the City Council, SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Mecting) TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) Moore, Tania
October 28 2022
From: Sent: To: Subject:

We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element Sent from my iPhone "maintain and enhance the quality and affondability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/acin the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)
No greater density than the 25 du /c HSSP anta.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

No rouf decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Erest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city, We urge the Cicy Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achleve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Nme: Parte MArIvER
Street Name Only/Emall STRATION CN LORI BITe 24)MSN.COM 2 Sienature/Initials
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:15 PM
To: Agenda Aterts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Thong Dinh <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 10:54 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Sent from Mail for Windows

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mesting Date:11 1/2002
Apenda lem Ao: SS#4 (22.900)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
1393
395 1394
398 240 25
396 239 244
Legend 397 249
246 245
Il City Boundary 250
302 4111121
Sites Inventory -339F14485684 247/238 2122
248
127 82)
$129 14161
185
412G ·160
·110 125g
137 - 2867
38 254
387
485
386
388-1
391 ฿89%
390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Thong Dinh
Name:

Stratton Lane/[email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

Thong Dinh/TD
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:17 PM
Sent:

To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Proposed High Density Developments Near Seagate From: Ingrid Lee < [email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 2:12 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Proposed High Density Developments Near Seagate Dear Council Members Delgleize, Posey, Carr, Peterson, Kalmick, Moser and Bolton, proposed plan to put 70 units/acre behind the Sherwood area. I am concerned the crowding will increase My name is Ingrid Lee, and I live in the Seagate Community of Huntington Beach. This is regarding the conflict in our neighborhood - increased traffic, crime and pollution. I thought Huntington Beach was a Charter City. I don't quite understand. However, if we do have to build 13,000 units of affordable housing ( again, I don't believe these units will be cheap), can they be redistributed so that there can be townhomes behind Sherwood as opposed to high rise apartments?
Thank you for your consideration,
Ingrid Lee

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mering Dato 12022
Aganda Mom No: SS$*4 (22-904)
1 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:17 PN
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda item number 22-906
Agenda item NO. 22-906 housing element November 1 2022 city council meeting.pdf Attachments:

From: Patrick D <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 8:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda item number 22-906
Council members,
Please consider the attached letter regarding the HSSP development. What is being proposed is simply out of control.

Thank you for your consideration,
Patrick Di Bernardo

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mesty Date: 11/1/2002
Agenda tam No: SS#4 (22.906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
893
395 394
39B 240
396 239 244
Legend 397 246|245 249
If City Boundary 250 302 121/22
= Sites Inventory 339-448 м 247.238
48 5182
·137
161
460
125
286
254
-387
385 386
388
389
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Patrick Di Bernardo
Name:

Calera Ln/ [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

PASTRO PD P.D.

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:18 PM
Agenda Alerts
To: FW: Seagate Housing Element concern
Subject: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
Attachments:

From: Effie Kee <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 7:37 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: Seagate Housing Element concern

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Da: 11/1/2022
Aponde Ham No: SS#4 (22-900)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 (394
398 1240
396 239
244
Legend 397 245 245 249
11 City Boundary 250 302 111
121
Sites Inventory 339-448 кака 247. 233 3122
248 2182
872772 137
4129
83 0 4161
312G 1160
125g
131 2867
384 1254
387
385 386
388-1
*391 3399
390*
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:19 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Agnes & Ted <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 10:29 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP
congestion and noise on Goldenwest and Gothard streets that have started to already be a problem as it has As a long time resident of HB since 1977, I am against having high density housing which would add to the awoken me several times in the early hours of the morning. The beautiful community of Seagate and surrounding areas would be severely impacted.

Agnes Do

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meting Dal: 1 1 2027
Agenda hom No. SS 4 (22.906).
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393B
395 (394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 245 249
246
1i city Boundary 250/302
1121
rea Sites Inventory 339 -448 c84 247/233 ฿122
248 2182
1257 :130
$129 8 4167
23 125750
110
384 131- 286]
254 %
385 387
386
388-1
13893
390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:19 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Regarding high density housing in HB
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element kong.pdf
From: Eunice Kong <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 8:20 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Regarding high density housing in HB
Please see attached letter regarding our concern for the proposed high density housing plan in the Huntington Beach Seacliff area.

Thank you,
-Eunice and Brian Kong

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 1112022
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 249
245|245
11 city Boundary
250 302 1 12
= Sites Inventory - 3301448 030 247 233 2122
248
1274 137
129 14167
183
2125 150
15: - 2862
38 254
-387
386
1388
43894
390*
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

Brian and Eunice Kong
Street Name Only/Email:

Siena Dr, Huntington Beach, ca, 92648
[email protected]
Signature/Initials:

Boks
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:21 PM
Agenda Alerts
To: FW: High Density Housing Element
Subject: SCANO198.PDF
Attachments:

From: Cassie Braun <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 5:48 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: High Density Housing Element
density proposal. Please see my attached letter that goes into further detail on my opposition. The community As a Sea Gate resident and having two kids in Sea Cliff elementary I strongly disapprove of this high knows all about the 4th of July parade, the marathon, the Air Show and yet you have not talked at all to any of us of this drastic proposal that is going to take place and fundamentally change our community.

Thank you,
Cassie Braun

SUPPLEMENTAL

CONMUNICATION
Meeting Dete 1412022
Agenda No No: S5H4 (22.906.)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and housing on the following lots with a 70 du/ac density: Lots 83, 110, 111, 121, 122, 126, 127, 129, 182, 231, 238, 239, 240, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 393, & 394.

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 246 245 - 249
City Boundary 250 302
339-448 247 238 121/2
Sites Inventory 248
Cle 182
1248 137
129.
183 233 -161
126 125 160
110 131
286
384 254
387
385 386
4112-388
391- -389
-390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Cassie Braun
Street Name Only/Email: Ashford Lane
Signature: • Maur
Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:21 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Huntington Beach Housing Element
Attachments: Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Matt Braun <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 5:32 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Huntington Beach Housing Element
Members of the City Council,
In advance of the Nov. 1 meeting on this topic, I'd like to make you aware of my views as a local resident of the Holly-Seacliff area.

Thank you,
Matt Braun

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
1112022 aconcesses
Meeting Date:

Agenda Hem No: SS # 4 (22-900)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing on the following lots with a 70 du/ac density: Lots 83, 110, 111, 121, 122, 126, 127, 129, 182, 231, 238, 239, 240, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 393, & 394.

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239 244
Legend 397 249
246 245
Il City Boundary 250 302 :111 12122
=a Sites Inventory 839г4460m-) 6248 247.238
2182)
F0L011272 - 1372
129 N161
183
126- 23 125160
110 M131
2867
384 254
387
385 386
388-1
391 389
2390
Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Matt Braun
Street Name Only/Email: Ashford Lane
Signature: Matt Braun
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:24 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
FW: Please read before Nov 1st; request to modify impact to SeaGate communities from Subject:
residential rezoning
Attachments: HSSP development concerns.paf
From: Davida Milo <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 9:27 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Cc: Davida Joan Milo - me <[email protected]>; Villasenor, Jennifer <[email protected]>; Zelinka, Al <[email protected]>
Subject: Please read before Nov 1st; request to modify impact to SeaGate communities from residential rezoning Hello City Council Members,
I am a 25 year HB resident and have urgent concerns about the 70 du/ac residential rezoning proposed less than 100 feet from the end of my street.

May I request that you please read the attached letter containing my concerns/proposed alternatives before the next council meeting which will address this issue. I understand it is on the agenda November 1st.

Thank you for your time and consideration,
Davida Milo
- Davida Milo
[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
1112002
Meeting at
Apanda Mom No: S9#4 (22.901)
1 October 28, 2022
SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES
TO: Our Huntington Beach Mayor and City Council Members:

My name is Davida Milo, and I have lived in Huntington Beach for 25 years. Our current home of 18 years inside the Sherwood community is located in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP). The plan made available to buyers when we purchased in 2004 calls for the development of a variety of uses but provides for residential uses at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac). My home is in a portion of the HSSP that is developed at a density of 7 du/ac. The plan acknowledges existing industrial area between Gothard Street to the east, Garfield Avenue to the south, Goldenwest Street to the west, and Ernest Drive to the north.

The first draft map of Housing Element candidate sites, released in the fall of 2021, showed a Housing Overlay at 35 dwelling units per acre across the full stretch of industrial area south of my home as shown below:

Draft Housing Overlay Fall 2021 - 35 du/ac maximum:

However, we very recently learned that map was revised to show double the dwelling density in roughly half of the same area - 70 dulac, which is a shocking proposal. 70 dolo
Current Draft Housing Overlay - 70 du/ac maximum:

The current proposal would completely and irreparably alter the character of our community that was context for Holly-Seacliff and is not in line with parameters provided in the plan for our low-density area when committed to home buyers in the HSSP, and it should not be approved. That density is totally out of than 10 homes away from us. A residential development of this density, in that small space, has clear potential we bought this house. We live on Ambrose Lane, a short street that ends against Ernest Drive. Ernest is fewer and likelihood to be a much higher rise building than our low-density area. It would dramatically erode privacy for our and our neighbors' properties to have a building of significant height (required to accommodate the du/ac currently suggested) towering over our neighborhood.

I definitely understand the nonnegotiable CA state mandate to zone for additional housing development in HB and that it requires zoning for a minimum defined number of dwelling units. I feel strongly that refusing to plan is tantamount to sticking our heads in the sand. It subjects our city to dangerous financial and legal risk. I think efforts and HB budget dollars spent to attempt to refuse to cooperate (e.g. suing our state) is a waste of HB city 1 employee time and our HB dollars. Instead, I hope that HB efforts and budget can be more productively directed at developing best case solutions to comply and evolve our city effectively within these requirements.

No city stays the same forever. I realize that complying with this large housing zoning mandate is challenging.

In my view, the best case is to propose plans to meet the mandate that provide the best possible outcome for as much of the HB resident population as possible. I'd welcome a well architected multi-family housing development (similar to existing Cape Ann community) adjacent to our community in place of the current industrial lots. I also hope each development will be subject to HB's architectural review.

I strongly suggest that
• The du/ac ratio should be restricted to 30 du/ac maximum for development in Holly-Seacliff for any residential zoning, with a maximum of 3 stories for buildings. • Adequate parking should be mandated for developers in Holly-Seacliff to accommodate future residents in line with HB municipal parking code for residential communities.

Parking regulation must continue to prohibit overnight parking on Ernest. • Rezoning along Ernest between Goldenwest to Garfield should stipulate a prohibition on balconies and roof decks since these structures would be a significant invasion of privacy into nearby homes and would introduce excess noise into adjacent low-density housing. • Rezoning for residential use in Holly-Seacliff should include industrial areas in the first and current draft Housing Overlay to better accommodate the state housing allocation quantity with lower density in each area. ALL land south from Ernest down to Gothard that is bordered between Goldenwest and Gothard (on east and west respectively) should be included in this residential rezoning with this 30 du/ac limit applied.
• Rezoning should comply with state mandate in a way that will distribute rezoning across the total HB geography to share this burden and not subject any one HB area to disproportionate strain.

In addition, I propose
• Rezoning for residential use in HB at higher densities above 30 du/ac should be reserved for areas adjacent to major HB corridors that already accommodate structures with heights of 4 stories or more.

Building new higher-rise residential buildings would be more consistent with the character of areas along major HB corridors that already have higher rise buildings. • Affordable housing quotas that are required of HB should be incorporated as modest percentages within each new construction and zoning plans. Low-income housing should not be singled out into separate buildings. A blend would allow reasonable access for lower income residents to live in quality communities while encouraging shared priorities amongst all residents to support a safe and well maintained community.

Incentives should be considered to entice the developer to incorporate a small playground or green space •
within their development to maintain HB's reputation as a city with superior ratios of park space per capita. This helps to maintain our property value and HB's desirability for families.

I sincerely appreciate your time and attention to my concerns. Please contact me if you have additional requests for my input at [email protected].

Thank you,
Davida Milo
2 Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:24 PM
Sent:

Agenda Alerts
To: FW: High Density Building Concerns HB
Subject:

From: Jenny Buettner <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 11:33 AM
Subject: High Density Building Concerns HB
To whom it may concern,
As a concerned resident for 55 years we are NOT in approval of the upcoming High Density Building being presented on November 1 & 15th.

I understand there is a vote coming up on the new proposed High Density Building near our Seagate community and we are among many of the concerned residents.

The impact of this proposed development will have an enormous traffic, litter, and real estate price impact on our city.
mention homelessness) and allowing for more HIGH density will turn us into an LA type of town.... our quaint, Currently, HB has too many HIGH Density areas that have caused many issues in our community (not to peaceful HB is turning into a hot mess with all the new developments being granted by the previous city councils.

Please VOTE NO on this and any future High Density Buildings.

Thank you!
- - SUPPLEMENTAL
Jenny Buettner COMMUNICATION
Shibue Couture
Office: 877-270-3313 Meeting Date: 11 2007
Apenda lom No: SS#4 (22.906)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
Thine i part, ap and any pocume to files or rio email mes gic at ed tri may contin that at mut no end or play ors raly pin and try anare not the Transmission in enor, please inediately noisy the sender by telephone or retim e-mail and delite the original transmis son and is tachmens it out reu hay or saving in any manner
1 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:20 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Housing Dendity
From: Danny Nguyen <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 6:15 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: Housing Dendity
Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As a long time residents of Huntington Beach, we urged you and the council members to reconsider the housing project (better yet to stop the project).

The city of HB has been known as one of the best place to live in California. also affects various important factors such as crime rate increase, parking and traffic congestion, The housing project is not only changing the look and the value of city of HB, the quality of life but it environmental effect like more noise & air pollution and over populate (we do not want the city to become the worst place to live in CA).

PLEASE STOP THE HOUSING PROJECT.

Best Regards,
Danny Nguyen.

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11/1/2022
Agenda ham No: 99#4 2a. 9000)
1 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Monday, October 31, 2022 10:26 AM
Sent: Agenda Alerts
To:

FW: Bel Air HOA -- Board letter
Subject: 2210 BAHA Board Letter to City Council re Housing Element[11[1].pdf Attachments:

From: Yasmin Daniels <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:09 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Subject: Bel Air HOA -- Board letter
Good Morning,
Please see attached on behalf of the Bel Air HOA.

Should you have any questions, comments, or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you and have a wonderful rest of the day.

Yasmin Daniels, CCAM
Community Manager
Office: (714)641-0593
Direct Line: (714)783-4288
Email: [email protected]
www.BluePacificProperty.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain confidential and proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify me by reply e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at 714.641.0593, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them in any manner.

SUPPLEMENTAL

CONMUNICATION
Meeting Det:. 1141/2002
Aganda Ham No: SS #4 (22.906)
1 DocuSign Envelope ID: B0E72893-05ED-4C7A-82EE-38480C30AE72 October 28, 2022
SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:
the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP). Many of our members are original homeowners that have We are the Bel Air Homeowners Association Board Members and represent the 102 homeowners in lived in Huntington Beach for over 20 years. As part of the Seagate Community Association, we held a Town Hall meeting with nearly 75 homeowners on Sunday, October 23"d to address the proposed Housing Element. All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community. development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the plan calls for the anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. high density would be considered in this area. 70 du/ac is ten times the density of our Because of the low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area, we are alarmed that such a neighborhood and would irreparably change the character of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, projects would be even higher and more dense. This type of urban development has no context in the low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Bel Air homeowners knowingly bought proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest into when purchasing their homes. Of specific concern, we are dismayed to see that the draft Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences. Also concerning is that areas in the northwest & southeast of the City are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density. not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft, but on all the industrial area between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with councilmembers and the community which reduce densities in the subject industrial area. The Bel Air Board of Directors would be in favor of any housing development the includes the following.

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

3. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B0E72893-05ED-4C7A-82EE-38480C30AE72 Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make it more We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November 15 to discuss the proposed consistent with homes in the surrounding areas.

Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to contact us.

Bel Air Homeowners Association
Board of Directors
Shuter president
- Docusigned by:

ERINMCHALE - Vice-President
- 106BEE60GD09449.
- DoauSigned by:
- Treasurer
luis Melo
0839E381EAD451..

DocuSigned by:
kris kilter. - Secretary
415B639C067247A...
- DocuSigned by:
- Director
75AFD0080539478...

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:25 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
FW: AGENDA ITEM No. 2-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Subject:

Meeting)
Attachments: Seacliff Plan.pdf
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:18 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: AGENDA ITEM No. 2-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear City Council,
proposal l am seeing. Please see the attached letter which reflects mine and my family's thoughts on this proposal in the Other than voting l am not one to get too involved in city politics but this issue has made me reach out because of the city and we urge you to not allow such high density in our small part of town. It doesn't fit in with the neighborhood dynamics and we will be at the meetings fighting this, and also fighting it with our votes in future elections.

Sincerely,
Paul Collier | Sr. VA Mortgage Consultant
Cell: (714) 904-4617
Fax: (866) 342-6276
Email: [email protected]

AMERICAN

VA LOANS
Apply Now!
NMLS# 927511 American NMLS #1802461
www.nmisconsumeraccess.org
and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, This communication, together with any attachments here to or links contained here in is property of American VA Loans, for the sole use of the intended recipient's 2222222 copying, printing, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments hereto or links here in, from your system. SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 111.2022
1 4 22900
Agenda item No.i
October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:
/ City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 (394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 245 249
245
Il City Boundary 250 302 l12/222
E Sites Inventory 339 - 448 гр 20 247/269
248 2182
127) 137
129 3167
183
126- 4160
110) 125.
286-
254
385 -397
386
388-4
391 2389-
·390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Paul Collier
Name:

Sinclair Ln. [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:26 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Subject:

Meeting)
From: Melissa Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 9:52 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

Ctyof Huntingion Beech
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figura B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1393
398 240
396 230 2423
Lagand 397 246 245 ·249
I City Boundary 250 302
121
339- 448 грн. 228 - 247 238 2122
"1821
=137
183 * 161,
126 =125:60
110
131 286
38%
1254
387
385 - 386
388
5393°2
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 SUPPLEMENTAL more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in heigh COMMUNICATION du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be 12022 Meating Date:
entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.
#4122-906
Agenda Item No.: J
The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Melissa and Jesse Johnson
7681 Park Forest Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92648
2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:27 AM
Agenda Alerts FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council To:

Subject:

Meeting)
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 20229:06 AM
Subject: Re: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Cc: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]> Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density.

We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stair wells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings in the HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

SUPPLEMENTAL

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 11,42022
1 Aganda Mam No: SS# 4(22-900)
We urge the City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Jia Luo
Seagate community resident
2 Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:28 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
FW: SIGNED YOON - AMBROSE LN - AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 HOUSING ELEMENT Subject: YOON-AMBROSE LN - AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 HOUSING ELEMENT_10-31-2022.pdf Attachments:

From: Your Grace <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 9:05 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL < city. [email protected]> Subject: SIGNED YOON - AMBROSE LN - AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 HOUSING ELEMENT Dear Huntington Beach City Council:

Please see attached signed homeowners of AMBROSE LANE, Stewart and Grace Yoon of SEAGATE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, HB signed 6 measures in the above "Housing Element".

Thank you and regards,
Grace and Stewart Yoon

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mosting Dai: 11 1 2027
Aenda Nam No: SS*4 (22-904)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:
2021202 Houng Ement DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
Pai
393
395 (3943
398 240
396 239 244
397 246 245 249
Legend
Il City Boundary SECE 250 302
339-740cve0 1121/2
• sites Inventory 0248 247.238
2182
$129 -161
*83 120/25
160
125 ₴
193- 286 YC
1254₴
387.-
385 386
119 C
388-
397 389
390 : д
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" annot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Stewart Yoon and Grace Yoon
Name:

Ambrose Lane / [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:
8814, 847-
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:30 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element Nov. 1, 2022 City Council Meeting Attachments: Letter HB Council- Seagate Housing Element 103122. docx From: James DelloRusso <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 8:00 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element Nov. 1, 2022 City Council Meeting Please forward the attached letter to all City Council Members today.

Thanks.

James DelloRusso

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Misting Data: 1 1 2022.

Apande lam No: SS*4 (22-906)
1 October 31, 2022
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (Nov. 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are AFFRONTED BY and OPPOSE any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density.

We OPPOSE these proposals as they stand because: 1. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 &

2. The proposed "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. character of our community.

3. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified?
As homeowners, if any "Housing Element" proposals come to pass, we insist on the following 6 measures:

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (NE corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (NE corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac anywhere in the HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings anywhere in the HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

These are calculations under which- IN GOOD FAITH- homeowners here have purchased their properties.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Homeowner of Seagate Community Association Name: James DelloRusso Street Name Only/Email: Garnet Lane [email protected]
Jars Dang no
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:32 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Subject:

Meeting)
From: H Muliadi < [email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:58 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density.

Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly Seacliff community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stair wells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 4. No more than 3 story buildings in the HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 1121/2022
Sincerely,
Meena Ham No: S4 (22-900)
Harun Muliadi
Ainsley Drive
2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:32 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Oppose High Density Housing near Seacliff Elementary (ZTA 22-006, LTA 22-00/) From: Jesse Biebesheimer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:13 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Oppose High Density Housing near Seacliff Elementary (ZTA 22-006, ZTA 22-007) Dear Members of the City Council,
As a long time resident of Huntington Beach, past graduate of Huntington Beach High School, and parent of two children at Huntington Seacliff Elementary School, I am writing to express concern about zoning changes that will have a profound impact on our neighborhood, schools, community, and quality of life.

Like many of my neighbors, I was surprised to learn about proposals for multiple high density housing developments in the Huntington Seacliff area. I am deeply concerned that this will increase congestion and traffic in the area. As a parent, I am worried about a massive influx of students to Huntington Seacliff Elementary School, Dwyer Middle School, and Huntington Beach High School. This will have a profound impact on classroom sizes and the quality of education for my children for years to come. These schools, already at capacity, cannot be expected to absorb hundreds of new students. No formal studies have been conducted to determine the impact on our schools. I am also concerned about construction traffic and noise immediately adjacent to Seacliff Elementary and the safety problems this will create.

The proposed developments simply do not fit with the character of our neighborhood, contradict decades of careful city planning, and will overwhelm our local schools.

I strongly urge the Council to vote against the High Density Housing Overlays to the Ellis Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff Specific Plans.

Sincerely,
Jesse Biebesheimer

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeling Date: 1/12027
Ss#4 (07.906).

Agenda lem No. an
1 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
FW: Item No. 22-906 - 2021-2029 Housing Element Candidate Sites (November 1, 2022 Subject:

City Council Meeting)
2022-10-30 - Crystalaire CA, Inc. - Board Letter to the HB City Council re Housing Attachments:

Element.pdf
From: AL < [email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:05 PM
To: Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara. [email protected]>; Posey, Mike «[email protected]>; Carr, Kim <[email protected]>; Peterson, Erik <[email protected]>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity- hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie. [email protected]>; Bolton, Rhonda <[email protected]>; CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>; Fikes, Cathy <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Kubas <[email protected]>; Louisa <[email protected]>; Vivian Ng <[email protected]>; Anna Straub <[email protected]>; Keith Angel <[email protected]> Subject: Item No. 22-906 - 2021-2029 Housing Element Candidate Sites (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)

PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED LETTER

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11/1/2027
Aganda lom No: SS#4 (22.90e)
1 CRYSTALAIRE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
18720 Crystalaire Lane
Huntington Beach, California 92648
October 30, 2022
Via E-Mail Only: [email protected]; [email protected];kim.carr@surfcitv- hb.org;[email protected];[email protected];[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Mayor of City of Huntington Beach
Member of the City Council
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main St.

Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: Item No. 22-906 - 2021-2029 Housing Element Candidate Sites November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:

This letter is on behalf of Crystalaire Community Association, Inc. ("Crystalaire"), which represents over three hundred residents of Huntington Beach and comprises homeowners of ninety- eight single-family residences in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan ("HSSP"). Many of our members are original homeowners that have owned their properties within Crystalaire in Huntington Beach for over twenty years.

As part of the Seagate Community Association, we participated in a Town Hall meeting with nearly seventy-five homeowners on Sunday, October 23° to discuss the proposed Housing Element.

All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community.

Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the city plan called for and allowed the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394), a maximum density of no more twenty-five (25) dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and, for the specific area on than 7 du/ac.

Because of the well-established low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area, we are alarmed that such high density projects would be considered in this area. Seventy (70) du/ac is 10 times the density of our neighborhood and, if allowed, it would irreparably and negatively change the character of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At the proposed density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, projects would be even higher and Mayor of Huntington Beach
City Council Members, City of Huntington Beach
October 29, 2022

more dense. These are not the densities our members reasonably expected to see when they invested in their homes within the HSSP.

The proposed high-density urban development has no context in the low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Crystalaire homeowners reasonably relied on and knowingly bought into when purchasing their homes.

Of specific concern, we are alarmed and disappointed to see that the current draft proposal would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences.

Also concerning is that areas in the northwest and southeast of the city are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density.

We are aware of the State mandates imposed upon cities to meet regional housing needs and the requirement to support a reasonable certified Housing Element for the City of Huntington Beach.

We understand the consequences of non-compliance. We would fully support a Housing Overlay at a reasonable density not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft, but on all the industrial areas between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with Members of the City Council and the community, which options reduce densities in the subject industrial area. Crystalaire would be in favor of housing development within the following criteria:

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than two-story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac in the HSSP area.

4. No more than three-story buildings in the HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November 1" to discuss the proposed Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make them consistent with the existing homes in the surrounding areas.

Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to contact us through our management company Elite Property Services, Inc. at (714) 357-3159 if we can provide any additional input.

Sincerely,
Shames
Allan Litovsky, Esq.

President of the Board of Directors
Crystalaire Community Association
Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM
Sent:

Agenda Alerts
To: FW: SeaGate Housing Element
Subject:

From: Yvi <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:28 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: SeaGate Housing Element
Dear Mayor Delgleize and members of the city council,
My husband and I have been homeowners in the SeaGate community for the past 13 years. We purchased this as our first home together after we married and loved this neighborhood specifically for the family appeal and the great elementary school (Seacliff) that our future children would attend. northeast and southeast corners of Goldenwest and Ernest. We understand that there is a need for more housing We recently learned that there are plans to develop high density housing adjacent to our neighborhood on the in Huntington Beach and are not opposed to it, but are appalled and dismayed that such high density housing would be considered in our area. Not only would it be completely out of character for our single family home (which is a main selling point for young families purchasing homes in this neighborhood). neighborhood but it would most likely cause redistricting of the elementary school for the children in our tract We would like to see the following in the Housing Element. a. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) b. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Erest) c. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.
d. No more than 3 story buildings in the
HSSP area.
e. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. f. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive Thankyou for your consideration in this important matter. SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Respectfully,
Yvi and Allen Gomez. Westing Date: m _11/1/2007
SeaGate Community homeowners
Agent tom No: 3S#4 (aa.90e)
1 _Gomez Letter-Seagate Housing Element.pdif
October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 (394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 245 249
246
1l City Boundary 250 302
339-448 SEAS 5122
ma Sites Inventory 248 247.239
182
1277
137
129
83 3161
126 251 -160
125
131 286R
384 254
387
385 386
388-1
397 389
·390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Yvi Gomez
Name:

Ashford Lane/ Yvi Gomez
Street Name Only/Email:

YCG
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM
Sent: Agenda Alerts
To: FW: Seagate Housing Element
Subject: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
Attachments:

From: Carol DiLibero <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 9:47 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]
Subject: Seagate Housing Element
Letter - Seagate Housing Element
Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA Google™ You have received this email because teamdilibero/@gmail.com shared a document with you from Google Docs.

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 111112022
Acenda Mom No: S He (22 906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

Clot Huntinglon Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Elbe Inventory
393
395 1302
398 240
396 239
243
Legend 107 246 245 -249
It city Boundary 250|302
/ 121
S2249 257 238 122
·182
7291 137
A 361
*126 3780
111D 2125
286M
38 254
3BT
3BE
386
388-
389
0190-2-
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: CAROL DILIBERO
Street Name Only/Email: SHERWOOD DRIVE, [email protected] Signature/Initials: Carol Dilibero
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Outrage letter and request from Seagate and Crystalaire homeowner Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element signed by Michelle Radcliffe.pdf From: Michelle Radcliffe <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 9:12 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Outrage letter and request from Seagate and Crystalaire homeowner Dear Council,
I hope that you will actually represent the concerns of our community and relied on when choosing to live in
NOT go against the plan that we all
Please see attached letter.

Thanks,
Michelle Radcliffe, J.D.

Crystalaire and Seagate resident

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
111/2022
Meeting Date:.

Menda lam No: S 4 (22.9000)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
196 239
244
Legend 397 246 245 249
Il City Boundary 250 302
339-448 г 221/22
E Sites Inventory 248 247/239
2182
*137
7129 9 4161
5*83
4126 4160
110 3125it*
131- 28622
384
$254
38700
385 386
388-1
391
37005
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
From: Guillermo Family <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 9:03 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntinglon Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 1249
546 1245
Il City Boundary 250 302 -111
L339-2290 Kazz
a Sites Inventory 3978 24723B
1 AME
170L
4290 -137
126) 231 1160
110 -253
286-
38 254
387
385
386
5388-1
389
390-
Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. Afthafdensty profeds would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements suğload shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. 112027 Meeting Date:
#4 (22.900)
Ananda fem No.:

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Preferably, please reconsider another area of Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Roy and Ashlee Guillermo
18736 Stratton Lane
Homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach 2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Call to Action
From: Paula Cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 8:21 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Call to Action
October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Emest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height
(or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified?
We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of GoldenWelP PLANENTAL 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

CONMUNICATION

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 11/1/2022
Meeing Date:,
9S#4 (72.906)
Acede liam An:

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Paula Cook
Park Path Dr.
2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
From: RG Haas <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 7:09 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear council member,
As an original homeowner in the Seagate community ( since 1998), I have been witness to steady growth in the HB community.

With it, increased traffic, noise, and a much less calmer atmosphere in general.

I am very opposed to the consideration of plans to adopt the proposed "housing element" and the high density housing plan. ("Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan)
This is completely out of line with the current structure and character of this community. Not only an increase in density of units but the associated elevation
Of structures.

As noted at a recent homeowners meeting:

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Sedit and nint lany est spirito pd race being werent are i denied in to chire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest&PPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 11 2022 Meeting Dafe.:. societime

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

R. Gordon Haas
Street Name Only/Email:

Foxboro Circle/ [email protected]
Signature/Initials:

RGH
2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:37 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Concerns Regarding High Density Housing Development From: F Spates <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 4:00 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: Concerns Regarding High Density Housing Development

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMUUNICATION
Meeting Date: 112022.

Agenda to Mo: SSH4 (27-90%e)
1 L, 2022 City Council Meeting) each we are ALTRACED and

¿ton Beach Housing Element
housing in Huntington Beach"
rable density to 70 du/ac in the
Sent from my iPad
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:37 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Concerns Regarding High Density Plan
From: F Spates <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 4:02 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Concerns Regarding High Density Plan

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:_ 4/1/2022
Agenda Nam No: SS#4 (2a-900)
1 L, 2022 City Council Meeting) each we are NITRACED and 3 ¿ton Beach Housing Element
housing in Huntington Beach"
rable density to 70 du/ac in the
Sent from my iPad
5 Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:39 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element Ray Flynn.pdf From: Raymond J Flynn <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 1:01 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element
Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element (Nov.1, 2022, City Council Meeting) The signed PDF attached explains my objections to the proposed "Housing Element" and proposed high-density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan.

Raymond J. Flynn

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting DefeA -1/1/2002
Agenda tam No: SS#4 (22-900)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:
2021202 Housing Flament DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
7oy2
Legend 2451243
Il City Boundary 250/3021
• sitas inventory -x240su* 2251230%
RG:
05-
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: RJ FLYNN
PROSPECT DR/riflynn. [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:38 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Seagate Housing Element-Letter
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element-10-30-2022,pdf From: Keri Lee-Hanamura <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 3:04 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Seagate Housing Element-Letter
Hello,
Please find the attached letter regarding the proposed development within the Seagate Community.

Respectfully,
Bryan Hanamura

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Moing Dato1112027
= Agenda roma: SS#4 (22:901.)
October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 246|245 249
Il City Boundary 250 302 111
a Sites Inventory - 339r 4495 247 233 165
48 187
*129. 137
183 -2161
$126 23 5160
110 125
131 - 2867
384 ·254
385 387
386
388-1
389)
390*
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Bryan and Keri Hanamura
Name:

Calera Lane/[email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

BH and KJLH
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:38 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Letter - Seagate Element - Ilse deBruin/Shaun Hansen Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Ilse de Bruin < [email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 3:51 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter - Seagate Element - Ilse deBruin/Shaun Hansen Please find signed letter attached
Ilse

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeling Date: 11/1|2022
Monda Nom Noi SS#4 (72.902)).
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 246 245
I! city Boundary 250|302 111
- 339430E 121
Ba Sites Inventory 247/238 122
248 182
129-
783 4161
$126 231 160
110 125.
131 2863
38 254
387
385
386
- 388-1
·893

39.0÷1
Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Ilse deBruin
Name:
18793 Roxbury Lane
Street Name Only/Email:
lse DeBruin and Shaun Hansen
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:43 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element - SS.pdf
From: Sergey Sedykin <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 2:17 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
11/12027
Mesilng Date: 0
Agande Mam No: 88#4 (27.9000)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

Clyal Huntinglon Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Ette Inventory
393
195
110B 240
198 779 242
Legend 837 246 245 249
It City Boundary 250 302
- Sites Inventory Đ04450A 249 22-7/235 122
7825
7729 137
185- 2161
126 2760
125-5
206M
384
254
3BS 387
386
180-3
190-2-
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach
Name: Sergey Sedykin & Olga Sedykina
Street Name Only/Email: 7411 Siena Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 82648 Signature/Initials: S. Sedykin
Olga Sedykina
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:42 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Opposition to Proposed Excessive High Density Housing in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Area
From: M. David Cole, MD <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 3:54 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Excessive High Density Housing in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Area I would like to add my voice of opposition to the current plans, as listed below, to add excessive high density housing developments to the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area.

I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH POINTS A THOUGH D BELOW AND WILL BE MONITORING THE OPINIONS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE OUTCOMES OF THIS ISSUE TO DECIDE HOW I VOTE IN FUTURE ELECTIONS.

Sincerely,
M. David Cole, MD
The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at amaximum density of no more than 25 dwelling A.
maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac which would irreparably change the character units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. e selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specif ans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and C. affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.

D. We would like to see the following in the Housing Element. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11112027
Agent him: 35*4 /22-900)
1 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:41 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element Kerry Flynn. pdf From: Kerry Flynn <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 5:22 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element
Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element (Nov.1, 2022, City Council Meeting) The signed PDF attached explains my objections to the proposed "Housing Element" and proposed high-density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan.

Kerry Flynn
Share and Care Always!
Kerry Flynn

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeing Date:. 11/1 2022
Aganda am No: SS#4 (22.9020)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Flgure B-10: Site Inventory
2L240
·396
Lagend
Il City Boundary
• Sites Inventory
29J
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac ASSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Kerry J. Flynn
set hame onlemal Prospect Dr./[email protected]
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:40 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Housing project
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pat
From: Danny Nguyen <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 20227:59 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Subject: Housing project
Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, Please reconsider the proposal.

Best Regards,
Danny Nguyen.

SUPPLEMENTAL

COWMUNICATION
1112022
Meeting Date:

Aganda am No: SSH4 (22.900)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
3933
395 394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 394 246 245 249
11 City Boundary 250 302 111
-350448024 12
Sites inventory 247/238 1928
248
1272 15792
11790
183 -161
6126) 23 125 160
110
131 286 2
384
254
385 387
386
388-1
3899
190°
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Danny Nguyen
Name:

Fairfax lane / [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

DN
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:40 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda Item 22-906
Attachments: City letter 2.pdf
From: don smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 7:37 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item 22-906

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:_ 111.2022
Agenda Mom As: SS#4 (22.90)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 249
246 245
Il City Boundary 250 302
sa Sites Inventory 139148- 3121/2
-5248 247 238
127% -182
129- * 137
783 7231 - 161
126 -125 160
110 131-
286
384
254
387
'385
386
388
397 389
- 390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Mary Dyer
Stret Name Only/Small: Latige/[email protected]
Signature/Initials: Mary Ryer / M.B
Also, please keep in mind the environmental
impact of all these homes.

In H.B. We have alrendy cutback the amountot
days we can water our lawns. Think how mach
more water would be needed for all these new
residences, where will if come from!
our power gird is already overloaded, some-
times rolling black outs are needed many at our
residents are cutting back use especially 4:t0-
1:oopm to help keep the power grid afloat, Where
will all the additional electricity come from I
Please consider the environmental impact along
with the a measures listed aboves.

Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:40 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda Item 22-906
Attachments: City letter 1.pdf
From: don smith <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 7:35 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item 22-906

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Notes Do 11/2025
Aganda Ham No: S5H4 (22-9020).
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:
ity of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAF
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 [394
398 240
396
239 244
Legend 397
246|245 249
1l City Boundary
250 302 1121022
E Sites Inventory -339 -4488
5248 247 238
1272 -182
129 :137
83 16]
126 231
110 - 125 160
131- - 286
384
254
·385 387
386
-388
391 389
2390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Donald Swith
Name:

Latigo [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

Doveel Swiet DS
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:43 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meting Date: 11 12022
From: Marina Wishengrad <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:37 AM Aganda Hom No: SSH4 (22.9020) To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, My husband and I purchased our home in the Seagate community a little over a year and a half ago. When we purchased our home, the main draw was Seacliff Elementary, and the quietness of the surrounding area. The draft proposal with plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density will GREATLY change the atmosphere of our neighborhood, and could risk the chances of our children attending Sea Cliff Elementary.

As a homeowner of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density.

We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified?
We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Marins Wishengrad
Homeowner of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach 2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:04 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Carl J. Temple Seagate Resident Request
Attachments: CJTemple102822.pdf
From: Temple Carl<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:52 AM
To: Fikes, Cathy <[email protected]>
Subject: Carl J. Temple Seagate Resident Request
Dear Cathy,
I am pleased to introduce myself as a 33 year resident of the City of Huntington Beach. I have been a property owner for 33 years and an original owner in the Seagate neighborhood since 1997.

I am reaching out to you, City staff and the City Council members to reduce this proposed and outrageous density increase from current 25 dwelling units/acre in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) to 70 dwelling units/acre. This scale of development will do significant harm to the over 800 homeowners within the HSSP neighborhoods for decades to come.
it is clear the proposed zoning changes to the HSSP do not equitably include other geographic areas in the City. There are many other options that include already in place transportation infrastructure and would not dramatically increase traffic, noise in HSSP area.
within Seagate may lose something as basic as sunlight due to multi-story, high density dwellings that may be proposed It is unfair for City planners to propose this level of density in largely single-family neighborhood tracts where homeowners for current streets such as Ernest Avenue.
members to continue to explore better geographic zoning options and immediately address this inequitable draft zoning Please see the attached request and detail from our neighborhood owners. We urge you, other City staff and City Council plan for HSSP.

Sincerely,
Carl J. Temple
[email protected]
714.402.7922

SUPPLEMENTAL

CONMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 111|2022
Aganda Hom His: SS#4 (22-906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City, [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:
ily of Huntington Beac
021-2029 Housing Element DRAF
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 392} 249
246-245
Il City Boundary
250 302 #12122
• Sites Inventory - 339-448 247 238
248 5182
127
29 137
B3 - 161
126 231 -125 160
131 286
384
254
385 387
386
= 386
391 5389
1390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly eacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to othe redominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entir North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Carl 5. Temple Cue C.232
Name:

Stvalton Lane templevoioeyahoo.com
Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/initials:
....

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Monday, October 31, 2022 11:08 AM
Sen:: genda Alerts
Subject: W: Approve Housing Element 6th Cycl
From: Homeless United Huntington Beach <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:25 AM
To: Delgleize, Barbara < Barbara. [email protected]>; Posey, Mike <[email protected]>; Peterson, Erik <[email protected]>; Carr, Kim <[email protected]>; Kalmick, Dan <[email protected]>; Moser, Natalie <[email protected]>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda. [email protected]> Cc: Fikes, Cathy <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Approve Housing Element 6th Cycle
Dear Mayor Delgleize and City Council Members,
We at Homeless United Huntington Beach have been tracking the development of the Housing Element - 6th Cycle for nearly 2 years. It has taken that amount of time for most of us to begin to understand the importance of this document and what goes into it. We continue to learn things related to homelessness and affordable housing as a result of this document and its importance in solving these problems. We want to thank our elected officials, the Planning Department staff, county representatives for meeting with us and giving presentations to HUHB and public workshops for the past few years. These presentations never failed to inform us of the purpose of the Housing Element, what issues it addresses and what the consequences are to a jurisdiction that does not have an approved document in place.

We believe that the document, September 23, 2022 HE Version, is worthy of your support and ask that the city council approve it by November 15th. Delay and any major edits will cause serious penalties to the city.

The staff and consultants have done a magnanimous job in identifying more than sufficient sites to meet the demand for housing over the next 8 years in our city. Once this document is approved, it will be up to property owners to develop these properties that will reach the goals of providing affordable housing stock.

SUPPLEMENTAL
Thank you, CONMUNICATION
Jenny Braithwaite
Karen Carroll aforing Onte:_ 2022
Shirley Detloff
1 (22-906)
Agenda lom No.:

Pat Goodman
Gigi Jackson
Laura Sire
Need Help - Give Help: 211 OC - County of Orange Social Services 24/7 Hotline or www.211oc.org City of Huntington Beach, Homeless Solutions www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/homelessness/ ERVIES
[email protected]
HUHB is a network of representatives from the faith communities, non-profits and advocates for those in need of clean, safe, affordable housing in our city. HUHB usually meets are held on the 3rd Thursday of every month, 7:00 pm, via Zoom. You may mail inquiries c/o CUMC, 6652 Heil Ave., Huntington Beach 92647
2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:39 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Housing Development
Attachments: 061 Board Letter to City Council re Housing Element 221028 docx From: Glen Williams <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 8:28 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Housing Development
Glen Williams
Senior Project Manager
CUPERTINO ELECTRIC INC.
8739 Dice Road Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
T: (562) 641-2412 | C: (562) 201-3224 | CEL.COM

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
1/1,2027
Meeting Date: e
1 October 28, 2022
SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:

We are the Cape Ann Homeowners Association Board Members and represent the homeowners in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP). Many of our members are original homeowners that have ived in Huntington Beach for over 20 years. As part of the Seagate Community Association, we hel Town Hall meeting with nearly 75 homeowners on Sunday, October 23"d to address the propose Housing Element. All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community.

Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the plan calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac.

Because of the low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area, we are alarmed that such a neighborhood and would irreparably change the character of our community. It is entirely out high density would be considered in this area. 70 du/ac is ten times the density of our of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Bel Air homeowners knowingly bought projects would be even higher and more dense. This type of urban development has no context in the into when purchasing their homes. Of specific concern, we are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences. Also concerning is that areas in the northwest & southeast of the City are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density.

We are aware of the mandates the State has put on cities to meet their regional housing needs and support a reasonable certified Housing Element for the City of Huntington Beach and understand the consequences of not having one. We would fully support a Housing Overlay at a reasonable density not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft, but on all the industrial area between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with councilmembers and the community which reduce densities in the subject industrial area. The Bel Air Board of Directors would be in favor of any housing development the includes the following. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November 1s to discuss the proposed Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make it more consistent with homes in the surrounding areas.

Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to contact us.

Cape Ann Homeowners Association
Board of Directors
Glen Williams - President
Chris Musser - Vice-President
Judy Durante - Treasurer
Carla Dispalatro - Secretary
Jennifer Kanowsky - Director
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:20 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element (Stratton Lane) pdf From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:11 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element
Hi City Council,
Please find the attached proposed letter from homeowner of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach.

Thanks,
Wai-Cheng Seetoo
Sent from Mail for Windows

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Dat 11l2002
Aponda lam No: SSH4 (22.906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394)
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 246 245 -249
f1 City Boundary
-339-448 250 302 1121/2
• Sites Inventory
248 247 238
1274 2182
1129 - 137
183 123) 2161
126
110 - 125160
731- 286
384
254
387
385
386
388
391- 1389
-390-7
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Wai-Cheng Seetoo
Name:
18747 Stratton Lane
Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:19 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: HB City Council Agenda item 22-906 Housing Element Attachments: Pathak Bharat_HB City Concil Agenda Item, 22-906 Housing Element, 10-31-22.pdf From: Bharat Pathak<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:07 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: HB City Council Agenda Item 22-906 Housing Element Honorable Mayor Delgleize and Respected City Council Members, Please find the attached letter regarding the above subject matter. Thank you.

Respectfully,
Bharat Pathak
SeaGate Community
Latigo Drive, HB 92648

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mealing Date. 11/1/2022
Agenda Itam No.: < S5$4 22906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
1393
395 1394
IД 398 240
396 239 244
Legend 397 1245 249
246
Il City Boundary 250 302
L 330-443 111124122
EJ Sites friventory 247238
$248
5182
1274-
137
129
183 10/231 -5161
-125 150
131- -2861
384 254
385 387
386
388€
391 -389
L 350
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach' cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Bharat H. Pathak
Name:

Latigo Drive/[email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

Вор нивамик / оне
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:19 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
AW: Seagate Community Call-TO-Action Letter (Signed)
Subject:

Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Kamil Sliwinski <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:05 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Seagate Community Call-To-Action Letter (Signed) Please see attached.

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 112022
Agenda lam Nia: 3574 22-906)
1 Kamil Sliwinski
Digital Marketing Specialist
(714) 580-2059
[email protected]
Orange County, CA
2 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239 244
Legend 397 246 245 249
Il City Boundary 250 302
a Sites Inventory 330-448 1112) 122-
248 247 258
127. -182
·129 - 137,
183 123
126 - 125 160
710
286
254
385 387
386
-388
391 389
-390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Kamil Sliwinski
Name:

Breezy Lane
Street Name Only/Email:

KS
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Jun, Catherine
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:51 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Co: Levin, Shannon; Fikes, Cathy
Subject: -W: Carl J. Temple Seagate Resident Reques
Attachments: Temple102822.pdf
FYI
Catherine
From: Temple Carl<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:29 AM
To: Jun, Catherine < [email protected]>
Subject: Carl J. Temple Seagate Resident Request
Dear Catherine,
I am pleased to introduce myself as a 33 year resident of the City of Huntington Beach. I have been a property owner for 33 years and an original owner in the Seagate neighborhood since 1997.

I am reaching out to you, City staff and the City Council members to reduce this proposed and outrageous density increase from current 25 dweiling units/acre in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) to 70 dwelling units/acre. This scale of development will do significant harm to the over 800 homeowners within the HSSP neighborhoods for decades to come. options that include already in place transportation infrastructure and would not dramatically increase traffic, noise in HSSP area. it is clear the proposed zoning changes to the HSSP do not equitably include other geographic areas in the City. There are many other It is unfair for City planners to propose this level of density in largely single-family neighborhood tracts where homeowners within Seagate may lose something as basic as sunlight due to multi-story, high density dwellings that may be proposed for current streets such as Ernest Avenue.

Please see the attached request and detail from our neighborhood owners. We urge you, other City staff and City Council members to continue to explore better geographic zoning options and immediately address this inequitable draft zoning plan for HSSP.

Sincerely,
Carl J. Temple
[email protected]
714.402.7922

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:.. _11 2022
Agendanim No: SS#4 (22.906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Hunlington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
1244
Legend 397 245 1245 - 249
11 City Boundary 250 302
es Sites triventory - 339 448 247/239 1111212
4248 -182
1212 137
83 - 161
126 /23
110 125 160
131 286
384
254
787
385
386
388
389
5390
Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Carl 5. Temple Cal C. 232
Stratton Lane templeroice yahoo.com
Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:41 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda Item No 22-906 Housing Element
Attachments: IMG_0856.pdf; IMG_0857.pdf
From: Lena Vergara < [email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:39 AM
To: Delgleize, Barbara <[email protected]> Cc: Fikes, Cathy <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item No 22-906 Housing Element
Dear Mayor Delgleize and Council Members-
I am writing to express my opposition to the current draft proposal to add 70 du/ac to the Holly Seacliff Area.

Please see my attached signed letter.

Thank you
Lena Vergara

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mesting Date e 11/1/2027
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventos
393
395 393
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 249
246 245
1l City Boundary
130 440 в 250 302 111122122
e Sites Inventory
248 257238
124 182
129
83 161
126
110 125 160
384 286
254
385 387
386
388
391 389
1390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac, The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being Impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entlre North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach Identified? "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story bulldings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Lena levada
Name:
6454 Forester Drive Hunt BeL
Street Name Only/Email:

Lena kennedyv igmu 92048
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:35 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Huntington Beach Housing Element
Attachments: 2210 SNA Board Letter to City Council re Housing Element.docx From: Matt Braun <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <[email protected]>; Carr, Kim <[email protected]>; Peterson, Erik <[email protected]>; Kalmick, Dan <[email protected]>; Moser, Natalie <[email protected]>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda. [email protected]>; Fikes, Cathy <[email protected]>; Zelinka, Al <[email protected]>; Villasenor, Jennifer <[email protected]>
Cc: steve schultz <[email protected]>; Diane R Fullerton <[email protected]>; Scott Kien <[email protected]>; Brian Knorr <[email protected]> Subject: Huntington Beach Housing Element
Members of the City Council,
On behalf of the other board members and the hundreds of homeowners within the Sherwood homeowners association, I am submitting the attached letter that discusses our strong opposition to the current housing element proposal of 70 dwelling units/acre on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest and the area bounded by Goldenwest, Garfield, Ernest and Stewart that are entirely out of character with the established surrounding area. We are also including alternative solutions that we believe would help to maintain the character of the neighborhood while still allowing the city to meet the required housing element guidelines.

Thank you,
Sherwood Homeowners Association

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMIMUNICATION
Heeling Deto: 1/1/2022
Mananas: S4 (22.906)
1 October 28, 2022
SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:

We are the Sherwood Neighborhood Association Board Members and represent the 234 homeowners in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP). Many of our members are original homeowners that have Lived in Huntington Beach for over 20 years. As part of the Seagate Community Association, we held a lown Hall meeting with nearly 75 homeowners on Sunday, October 23"d to address the proposed Housing Element. All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community.

Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the plan calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac.

Because of the low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area, we are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. 70 du/ac is ten times the density of our neighborhood and would irreparably change the character of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, projects would be even higher and more dense. We are very concerned that projects at that height could include windows, balconies, and/or roof decks that would negatively impact the privacy of Sherwood homeowners. This type of urban development has no context in the low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Sherwood homeowners knowingly bought into when purchasing their homes. Of specific concern, we are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences. Also concerning is that areas in the northwest & southeast of the City are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density.

We are aware of the mandates the State has put on cities to meet their regional housing needs and support a reasonable certified Housing Element for the City of Huntington Beach and understand the consequences of not having one. We would fully support a Housing Overlay at a reasonable density not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft, but on all the industrial area between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with councilmembers and the community which reduce densities in the subject industrial area. The Sherwood Board of Directors would be in favor of any housing development the includes the following.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November 1"' to discuss the proposed Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make it more consistent with homes in the surrounding areas.

Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to contact us.

Sherwood Neighborhood Association
Board of Directors
Steve Schultz, President
Diane Fullerton, Vice-President - Via phone
Scott Kien, Treasurer
Matt Braun, Secretary
Brian Knorr - Director
Mail - Moore, Tania - Outlook
10/31/22, 3:29 PM
FW: Hall Town Meeting - Nov 1st
Fikes, Cathy < [email protected]>
Mon 10/31/2022 11:34 AM
To: Agenda Alerts < [email protected]>
@ 1 attachments (1 MB)
Letter - Seagate Housing Element (1).pdf;
From: Ask Beth <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:02 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL. <[email protected]>
Cc: Erik Walton <[email protected]
Subject: Hall Town Meeting - Nov 1st
Good morning,
ease see the altached letter signed on my behalf. I am a local real estate agent that has been working with Donna Hom in the Seagate neighborhood for over 20 years. Our concers are listed in the lett d will be read aloud by Brik Walton who will be representing Donna and 1 as we are both out of tow Thank you for your time in receipt of this information.

Warmest regards,
-Beth
Beth McCloskey McCLOSKEY&CO.

Huntington Beach Office
A Lict 01930596 | (949) 933-1851
[email protected]
askbeth.com
FIRSTTEAM® CHRISTI

INTERNATIONAL REAL ES

REAL ESTATE

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date 11/1/2022
Menda ham No: SSH4 22-907)
1/1
bino llutonk office365 com/mail/deeplink?Print
DocuSign Envelope ID: 848709F1-BAE1-485F-B3E8-C2EE23563C00 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 -249
246. 4245
Il City Boundary
250 302 W12122
E Sites Inventory 539-448 гр 247 238
248
1274- -182
129. *137
83, 5161
126 23 A160
110 125
131- 2862
384
254
387
385
386
388
391
1,89
7903
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? DocuSign Envelope ID: 848709F1-BAE1-485F-B3E8-C2EE23563C00 We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Flement.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Beth Mccloskey
Name:
[email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:
-DS
- DocuSigned by:

BM
Signature/Initials: Beth Melloskey
-CAME 15469489.

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element - CLINES.pdf From: Carrie Lines <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:16 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Please see attached letter, thank you.

Carrie Lines
Homeowner at Rockridge Drive, HB
[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
11/1202
Meeting Date...

Apanda Mam Ha: SS4 (22.900)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density lousing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239 244
Legend 397 - 249
246 245
Il City Boundary
330-443 250 302
Sites Inventory 247 239
248
41274 3182
129 *137
83 - 161
4126
110 -125160
131- 286-
384
254
385 387
386
-388
391 1389
-390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings ASSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach
Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Carrie Lines
Name:

Rockridge Drive, [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

CL
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Letter - Seagate Housing Element
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Brian <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:17 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter - Seagate Housing Element
Please review the attached letter in opposition to the proposed increase to housing density in the SeaGate neighborhood. Thank you,
Brian Rowe

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Dato.. 11/12022
Agenda kam No: SS#4 (22-906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 194
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 249
246 245
Il City Boundary
- 339-448 250 302 1111121
• Sites Inventory
248 247 233 -102
127
·129 ·137
*83 161
·126 231
110 - 125 160
384 31 3286
254
385 387
386
388
391 389
-390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach

BRIAN ROWE
Name:

Sherwood Drive / [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

BRYANROWE
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EW: Aoprove Housing Element
----Original Message-.

From: laura sire <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:21 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Cc: laura sire <[email protected]>
Subject: Approve Housing Element
Dear Mayor Delgleize and City Council Members,
Hello there. This is Laura Sire. I'm writing as a proud member of Homeless United Huntington Beach. I've done research and work over the last couple of years with some of the HUHB members on the Housing Element, which has recently and finally been approved after 6 drafts. The hard work, perseverance, and patience of the City Staff, Planning Commission, and you our City Council, is to be commended for seeing this document through.

There is an excellent email written and submitted to you on behalf of the HE committee and penned by Pat Goodman.

She has stated everything perfectly. I'm just adding my urgent request that you approve the September 23rd, 2022 HE version as it is written so that we will have no further delays or penalties from the state. The exhaustive document sets forth all the statistics and facts needed to confirm the obvious: We need affordable housing in our city that will accommodate all of its residents including all levels of income (and those unhoused) starting now and continuing into the next 8 years. It sets forth a plan for accomplishing this.

I came to Huntington Beach with my family at the age of 14. The city and housing needs have, of course, changed over the past 60 years. Those who oppose the HE do not appear to accept this change, and prefer to see it as a mandate, not the flexible plan that it is. Please be the forward thinking and fair-minded democratic governing body I know you to be.

Approve this document which will provide a housing plan that will carry us into a better, brighter future.

Thank you,
Laura Sire
Member Homeless United Huntington Beach

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:.. 11/12002
senda nam No: S4 (22-906).
1 Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element - NLINES.pdf ---Original Message-.

From: Nicholas Lines <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:27 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Sent from my iPhone

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meelng Date: 11/1/2022
Agenda Nam No: SS#4 (22.902)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 (394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 3972 249
246 245
Il City Boundary
- 339-448 250302 TI121/22
E Sites Inventory
248 247 238
1274 182
129 137
83 3-161
126 23 - 160
110 125g
131 2862
384
254
385 387
386
388
391 389
390%
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Nicholas Lines
Name:

Rockridge Drive, [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

NL
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Attachments: [Untitled].paf
From: Bunker, Gregory <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:36 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and Members of the Huntington Beach City Council, Please see attached in regard to the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. If you have any questions I can be reached at the phone number listed below.

Thank you for your time,
Greg Bunker
714-743-8664

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11/1/2007.

Aponalam No: SSH4 (22.906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 -249
246 245
Il City Boundary
250 302 1l 2022
Es Sites Inventory
248 240 239
127 182
137
- 161
$126 231
110 125 160
131 286
384
254
385 387
386
388
301-
8389
4700
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Blement annot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable dersity to 70 du/ac in th naintain and enhance the quality and alfordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Erest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow övernight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city:

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Hüntington Beach Name: Ereg Bunker
Ashford Lave /Garagerbunter Ance
Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials: Bef
.......

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan SP 7 RH Overlay ----Original Message----
From: Sharon Komin< <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:50 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan SP 7 RH Overlay Mayor Delgleize, Councilmembers Bolton, Carr, Kalmick, Moser, Peterson and Posey, Thank you for taking the time to hear my concerns. As a 25 year resident of Huntington Beach, I am opposed to the Ellis- Goldenwest Specific Plan SP7 Overlay included in the High Density Housing Rezoning Overlay-ZTA 22-006 for multiple reasons:
-the proposed overlay violates the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan that was adopted by the city in June 1989 and states very specifically that there will be only single family dwellings with a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet and a minimum 15,000 net square feet for 20% of the lots
-high density housing will negatively impact the area schools with overcrowding as well as all HB schools that will have to be redistricted
-traffic and the inevitable shortage of parking at high density developments would be greatly increased with new streets going through our neighborhood which has no sidewalks and is utilized by many for exercise and activities -it was disappointing that impacted residents were not made aware of a proposed plan that began last February -recently developed high density housing on the Edinger corridor and at Beach & Ellis have, in my opinion, lacked a large enough minimum required set-back from the street as well as minimum required planting and soft scape to maintain the beauty of our city
In addition, I am also opposed to the Holly SeaCliff Overlay for the above reasons as well as keeping Goldenwest from becoming the same as Beach Boulevard.

Thank you again for your consideration of the above issues and the removal of the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff overlays which I am against.

Sharon Komin

SUPPLEMENTAL

CONMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11112022
Agenda l'em No.: 38#4 22-609)
Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Seagate Housing Element
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Matt Sliwinski <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:52 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Seagate Housing Element
Hello,
please find attached our letter regarding the above mentioned subject Matt Sliwinski
Breezy Lane, Huntington Beach.

SUPPLEMENTAL

CONMUNICATION
Mothy Do 11112022
Agenda Hom No: SS74 22-906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
195 1394
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 246 245 249
Il City Boundary
250 302 111121
• Sites Inventory 339-448 247/25B 3122
248
3822
129 1372
83 0-161
126 23
2110 - 125160
S3x 11 -2869
254
385 1387
386
- 388
301- 389
3390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Matt and Magdalena Sliwinski
Name:

Breezy Lane / [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

MS
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EW: Concerns from a Seagate Resident
Attachments: Letter%20-%20Seagate%20Housing%20Element.pdf.pdf From: Barbara Angeles Luecha < [email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:05 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Concerns from a Seagate Resident
Dear Huntington Beach City Council members,
Please consider the concerns of your Seagate neighbors regarding the new housing developments on Goldenwest. The attached letter highlights our desire to maintain a safe, family-friendly neighborhood. Please support our efforts to protect our children from being rezoned out out of Seacliff Elementary.

Sincerely,
Barbara Luecha
Sent from my iPhone

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mocking Data 2002
Aganda Nom No: SS#4 (22-90le)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 249
246 245
I City Boundary
339-448 250 302
C Sites Inventory
248 247 238
1825
129 137
83 23) -161
126
110 -125 160
131- 286-
384
254
385 387
386
-388
391 1389
3390г
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element signed.pdf From: Peter Hart <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:46 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element
Dear members of the Huntington Beach City Council,
Please see the attached letter in regards to Agenda Item No. 22-906 and my concerns on the impact it will have with my development (Seagate) and the surrounding areas, as the plan sits today.

We are hopeful that the CIty Council will consider our concerns and input on this significant issue.

Respectfully,
Peter Hart
Ashford Lane - Seagate

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: a 111|2022
Apenta lam No. SS#4 (22-90le)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and Aoing in the Holy-Sait specie Pian sp) neil 70nd ad de proposed high density City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
244
Legend 397 -249
246 245
1l City Boundary
250 302 1102-22
* Sites Inventory - 339-448 247 259
240
9274 2182)
129 $137
83 161
126- -160
325
384 151 286
254
387
385
386
388
301-
389.
-390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Peter Hart
Name:

Ashford Lane/[email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

Peter Hast PAH
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pof
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: nataliearvesen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 2:07 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
Kind regards,
Natalie Arvesen

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Missing tater 11112022
Aganda lam No: S9#4 (22-906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 1394
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
3911 246 245 -249
Il City Boundary
-10-A8 250|302 W121/2
• Sites Inventory
248 247238
=182
·137
- 161
1126 23
-125 160
304 B 286
254
385 387
386
=388
301-
1389
390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Attachments: Steve City pdf
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 2:14 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) SUPPLEMENTAL

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. COMMUNICATION

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive Meeting Date: 1 2028 4(22-906)
Agende lom No.:.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Steve Fought
Street Name Only/Email: UPPER BAY DRIVE / [email protected] Signature/Initials: see attached PDF for signature
October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
(393
395 (394)
398 8240
396
239 244
Legend 397 - 249
246 245
I City Boundary
339 448 250 302 111 121/22
E3 Sites Inventory 247.238
E*248 - 182
127.- = 137
129*
83- - 161
126 - 231
110: = 125160
131- 286
384
254
- 387
385
386
388
3912)
- 389
·390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly predominantiy single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach SiLUE FOUGHT
Name:

[email protected]
Street Name Only/Email: UPPER BAY DRIVI
NoT 156
Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Cynthia - AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Attachments:

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 2:17 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Cynthia - AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & SUPPLEMENTAL Ernest) COMMUNICATION

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 12027

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Rig aU 4(27-906).

Agenda Itom No.:

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Cynthia Fought
Street Name Only/Email: UPPER BAY DRIVE / [email protected] Signature/Initials: see attached PDF for signature
October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 1240
396 239 1244
Legend 397 246 245 249
I City Boundary 250 302
112122
a Sites Inventory 239- (48) 247 238
฿248 3182
1247
129 137
*83 161
126- 231
- 125 160
110-
131 - 286
384
254
387
385
• 386
388
391- 389
-390
Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

UPPIN BAY DRIVE - CyN [email protected]
Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials: Cystle Pughet
Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Letter regarding proposed High Density Housing Attachments: doc00017920221031132225.pdf
From: David Walling <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 2:23 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter regarding proposed High Density Housing Letter regarding proposed High Density Housing

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
reing Die 11/2022
Aporia am No: SSH4 (22.906).
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:
/ City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 246 245 249
I1 City Boundary
L 30449120 250 302 111121-22
• Sites Inventory
248 247.238
2100 1272 -182
129 137
831 -167
DO TEL - 125160
-2867
384 254
385 387
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: David P. Walling
Street Name Only/Email: RocKridge Dr. [email protected] Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Message from "cmAdminO1"
Attachments: 20221031145752530.pdf
----Original Message--.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 2:58 PM
To: Levin, Shannon <[email protected]>
Subject: Message from "cmAdmin01"
This E-mail was sent from "cmAdmin01" (IM C4500).

Scan Date: 10.31.2022 14:57:52 (-0700)
Queries to: [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Dete 1111202.

And tam No: S 4 (2a906)
1 MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL October 23, 2022

OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
C/O Cathy Fikes and Johanna Stephenson
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: Proposed Rezoning of the Brindle-Thomas Property
Dear Members of the City Council:

I was born in an American Concentration camp in Heart Mountain Wyoming in 1943. My parents raised neighborhood. I did just that and by spending my entire life savings at the time to own a home on me to work hard to earn a living and to achieve the American dream of owning a home in a nice Edwards Hill expecting to live out a quiet life in a neighborhood that my wife and I selected because of the large lots, low density, the walking areas afforded by the equestrian walkways, great schools for my children and grandchildren. Huntington Beach so far has done a good job of zoning and maintaining a reasonable separation of homes and businesses and low and high density housing.

Responsible zoning is a must for any City to achieve its goals. I do understand that the State has some rules it pushes down the Cities that tries to equalize everything but that is not reality as it does not factor in the sacrifices and hard work that is required to own a nice home and also not all Cities are equal and not all Property Lots are not equal. For some people our life savings are represented in our house.

The Edwards Hill area where I live is specifically bordered on its approximately 35/8 sides (Edwards, Ellis, Goldenwest, Garfield) with Single Family housing. The Brindle Thomas property would be completely out of place and a major eyesore to the City if multi storied affordable housing units were allowed to be built.

One of The Planning Commission's primary role should be for responsible zoning to maintain the beauty of the City areas and use Transition Zones. This is not a transition plan but more like installing a City Park in the middle of the Redwood forest because some land is available because of a forest fire. All lots are not equall The Planning Commissions proposal is so way out with this re zoning proposal it may warrant an investigation into who and why was this proposal made and why was it kept quiet for so long?
1 am a long time resident and look forward to a few more years around the sun here but l ask the City Council to reject the proposal by the Planning Commission to rezone the Brindle Thomas Property as it would just be an eye sore on an otherwise beautifully designed and planned City. I believe the City Council and Planning Commission can find a better suited transition location for affordable housing than having to ReZone the Brindle Thomas location from its originally intended purpose.

Thanks for your consideration in this matter.

Sincerely,
Gary Okura, resident of Edwards Hill
Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Proposed Holly-Seacliff Housing Development Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Jennifer Rozolis-Hill <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:00 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Proposed Holly-Seacliff Housing Development
To Whom It May Concern,
We completely disagree with the new proposed housing development in the Holly-Seacliff area. It is an insanely large development that will negatively impact the quality of life for the surrounding neighborhoods. Attached please find the letter with details regarding this development.

Regards,
Thomas and Jennifer Rozolis-Hill

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 4/1/2022
Moonda Hom No: SS#4 (22-9016)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Besch
2029-2029 Housing Elemenl DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 394
39B 240
396 230/222
Lagend 307 245 249
246
It Chy Boundary
250 302 -121
2 sitar Invaraory 339-448 257 230 9122
248 182
729 1374
*83 167
426 231
EAZ150
10 EL 206

25.4 385 387
386
-38B
381
E390-8
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element annot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in th maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, HuntingtonBeach Name: Thomas and Jennifer Rozolis-Hill
Street Name Only/Email: Upper Bay Drive/[email protected] Signature/Initials: TRH, Thomas Rozolis-Hill, and JRH, Jennifer Rozolis-Hill 5 Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Concerns on High Density Housing
----Original Message--
From: F Spates <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:03 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Concerns on High Density Housing
The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units per acre anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest and Ernest no more than 7 dwelling units per acre. The current "Housing Element" shows 70 dwelling units per acre which would irreparably change the character of our community and not be pleasing to the eye on Goldenwest or any neighbors backing up to this proposed out of place structure.

If a plan is approved to build on lots 393 & 394, we would like to see no more than 2 story townhomes in the lot behind us with no decks or balconies facing us.

Sent from m

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11/1/2022
Agenda Mom No: SHy (22-90le)
1 Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Protest Hamptons Affordable Housing Plans
From: ruskeepop9798<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:26 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Cc: ruskeepop9798<[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Protest Hamptons Affordable Housing Plans
October 28, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Huntington Beach City Council
2000 Main Street Meeling Date: 11/1,2022
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear City Council Members; Aganda Mem No: S3H4 (22.900).

I am writing you to protest the development of property near my home for the purpose of affordable housing. The area where my family lives, along with several hundred other home owners, is not and never has been intended or zoned for structures with multi-resident occupancy in the design mode of large apartment houses or condominiums.

The City's master plan, created over 30 years ago, designated our area for large lots with homes of corresponding size. When purchasing our home it was clear to us that the City of Huntington Beach (herein after referred to as The City) intended to create an upscale neighborhood with enhanced property values in order to increase City tax revenues.

Now after 30 years, the City is attempting to break this fiscal covenant by infusing a financially upscale residential area with lower cost construction not originally envisioned or intended for our area. The City's community guidelines now in effect for several decades is being subverted to benefit The City's tax base and to monetize builders who otherwise could not afford to construct competitively priced housing within our city.

Our area of Huntington Beach was intended to be an equestrian area with miles of riding trails, equine exercise and exhibition rings and hundreds of stables. To plunk down a development consisting of low income housing into this unique enclave seems like a poorly conceived joke designed to heighten social rancor and raise one important question: Is there no other area in Huntington Beach for a social engineering project like this at a more affordable price? More important, there is a massive safety issue to consider. Our community was designed decades ago with horse trails that substitute for sidewalks. This means that children walking to school do not have curbs as protective barriers from passing cars. This situation invites disaster and poses enormous liability to the city in case of an accident. Does it seem logical that foot traffic should be increased in this area by building more housing?
I strongly urge The City to move this project to a different location in Huntington Beach where it will better balance and complement the adjacent community and possibly find a more supportive and safer infrastructure. Please uphold the promises made in our city's Master Plan and honor the promises made decades ago to Huntington Beach homeowners and citizens.

Sincere regards,
Terry & Penny Nelson
6921 Derby Circle
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:42 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Proposed building site
----Original Message--..

From: janet hermer <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 3:41 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subiect: Proposed building site
Hello,
I live in Greystone Keys and agree with the proposals set forth in the letter to which I am responding. Unfortunately I am out of the area on the dates of the meetings and so am unable to attend.

Thank you,
Janet Hermer
Sent from my iPad

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Det: 1|1/2007
Agenda hom No. n Ss#4 (20-906).
1 Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 4:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mering Booi11/1/2022
From: Diane Song <[email protected]> 18#4 22-906
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:57 PM Agenda fem Peo.

To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Cc: Diane Song <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density.

We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be
entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified?
We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element to "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & 1 Ernest

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Diane Song
Ashford/[email protected]
DS
2 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 6:22 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Overlay From: Frank <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 5:18 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Cc: Sharon Komin <[email protected]>
Subject: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Overlay Mayor Delgleize, Council members Bolton, Carr, Kalmick, Moser, Peterson and Posey, My name is Frank Komin and I am a 25 year resident of the Edwards Hill quarter section. I would like to formally express my dissatisfaction with the proposed Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan as included in the High Density Housing Rezoning Overlay - ZTA 22-006. Likewise, I would like to express my dissatisfaction with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan contained in the same overarching Rezoning Overlay. As such, I am urging each of you to disapprove these proposals for numerous reasons, including the following:
• Each of these areas was never designed to accommodate high density housing. The existing infrastructure, including schools, traffic, parking, police, fire and medical services are clearly insufficient to support the flood of new residents into these neighborhoods. • My wife and I were diligent in evaluating all aspects of this area when we originally purchased our home and relied heavily on the Specific Plan that established clear guidelines for new construction and equestrian standards. This plan was re-approved numerous times by the City council. To suddenly change this feels like a breach of good faith, at a minimum. • As part of California State law and CEQA, there was clearly not an adequate EIR process performed that sufficiently informed the public of the project environmental impacts. The legislative intent of CEQA to "look before you leap" was never sufficiently accomplished in this case. • We never received any notification that this project was even being contemplated until we were notified by word of mouth from our neighbors.
• The addition of the new streets needed to support the new housing project will create traffic congestion and introduce a variety of significant safety concerns.

I am hopeful that simply removing these two areas from the City's proposal would both satisfy California State guidance and avoid the potential for any unnecessary litigation at the same time. Again, I am urging your support to disapprove both the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff high density rezoning proposal.

Frank Komin SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mesing Date: 11/1/2022
sst4 (22-900)
1 Agenda tem No.:

Moore, Tania
From: Kenneth Inouye <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 9:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: support of Huntington Beach's housing element
October 31, 2022
Dear Honorable members of the Huntington Beach City Council:

I am a resident of Huntington Beach and I support the implementation of a City wide housing plan which will provide for much needed housing while at the same time preserve the quality of life for the current residents of Huntington Beach.

Respectfully,
Kenneth K. Inouye
19321 Worchester Lane
Huntington Beach, CA. 92646
Sent from Mail for Windows

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Messing Date: 111/2022
Agenda Nom No: S8#4 22-906)
1 Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Fikes, Cathy
Subject: FW: SeaGate Housing Element
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf
From: Allen Gomez < [email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 6:34 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL < [email protected]>
Subject: SeaGate Housing Element
Mayor Delgleize and City Council members,
We would like to see the following in the Housing Element. a. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) b. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) c. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.
d. No more than 3 story buildings in the
HSSP area.
e. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. f. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully,
Allen Gomez

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meellng Date:_ 11|12027
senda tom No: SS$4 (2a-900)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 [394
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 246 245 249
Il City Boundary
250 302
• Sites Inventory -339 -448 #12/22
248 247/238
127 -182
129 *137
83 231 - 161
126 12 160
110 131
286
384
254
387
385
386
388
391 389
-390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name:

Street Name Only/Email:

Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Fikes, Cathy
Subject: FW: Seagate Community Issue
Attachments: SC308_Sales22103114430.pdf
From: Brandon Wishengrad <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:11 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Seagate Community Issue
Please see attached.

Thank you,
Brandon Wishengrad

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11/1/2022
Aganda Mom No: SH4 (22.904)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City. [email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFI
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 (394
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 246 245 - 249
I City Boundary
• Sites Inventory 250 302
- 339 - 448 111 121122
248 247/238
125 -182
129 137
231 161
126-
110 - 125 160
131-
384 - 286
254
385 387
386
- 388
391
L 39389
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest &

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Brandon Wishergrad
Street Name Only/Email: Ashford Ln bwishengcalejmsil.com Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:09 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Opposition to Bella Terra 7 story and Brindle Build -----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Pappas <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 7:56 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Cc: Dennis Pappas <[email protected]>
Subject: Opposition to Bella Terra 7 story and Brindle Build Dear Huntington Beach City Council,
Please consider delaying the vote on these two developments; Bella Terra 7 Story-Burlington Coat Factory and the Brindle Property. We have not had enough public input nor do we have the infrastructure to support these builds. This can be a project or project for the new city council to deliberate.

Respectfully,
Thank you,
Patricia Pappas

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:. 11|1 2027
Agenda Nom No.: SS#4 (22-906)
1 Moore, Tania
From: MONICA SEHNERT <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Burlington Coat Factory and Brindle Property
Dear Huntington Beach City Council,
Please consider delaying the vote on these two properties; Burlington Coat Factory and Brindle Property till after the new city council has been established for the upcoming year. Our infrastructure is already strained and I fear this will overburden the existing one. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Respectfully,
Monica Sehnert
Sent from my iPad

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11|1 2002
And Mom Ma: SS#4 (22-906)
1 Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:30 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Agenda Item No. 22-906! Housing Element
From: Courtney McClellan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:23 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Cc: Courtney McClellan <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item No. 22-906! Housing Element

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11/12027
seama mia: SSH4 (82-900)
1 Beach Housing Element
sing in Huntington Beach"
-e density to 70 du/ac in the
d in this area.
sing Element.
t corner of Goldenwest &

122 City Council Meeting)
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:13 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)
Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element - list.pdf From: Carrie Lines <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:57 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <[email protected]>
Subject: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Please see attached letter from 5 homeowners in Seagate (emails included in letter).

Andrew Kwan
Thong Dinh
Carolyn Lewis
John W. Lewis
Thank you.

Carrie Lines
Homeowner at Rockridge Drive, HB
[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: _111 2022
Agenda Nam No: SSH4 (22-906)
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
393
395 (394
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 245 245 249
Il City Boundary
• Sites Inventory 339-448 250 302 121/22
248 247/238
127 2182
129 137
783 231 -161
1265 -160
110 125g
382 31 286
254
385 387
386
388
391 389
·390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element maintain and eveat the quality andro die of tising housing in lu to 0 daintie HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: SEE ATTACHED LIST
Street Name Only/Email: SEE ATTACHED LIST
Signature/Initials: SEE ATTACHED LIST
NAME SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting)

STREET NAME

ANPREW KWAN EMAIL SIGNATURE
72,5 SHER6O000
н.В. 9264₴
Janai Kwan 12/5 Sher wooci ak war. (? co. com.

Dr. H.B. CA92645 janai montaya c
THONG DiNH 18687 STRATTON LN gmail. con
CARdYA LEWİS HB CA 92648 [email protected] Clayla
Cardyn Lewra 18116 STRATTON LN
JWLItOT51@
HuntIniGtoN BcLCA 92648 AOL. COM
olobn w.dewis 18716 STRATTON LN Cardyn Leuia
HunTing too BCaCA 92648 Swnhot57@
AOL. Com
Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:13 AM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: HDD!
Importance: High
From: Gary Tarkington < [email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:57 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Subject: HDD!
Importance: High
ABSOLUTELY NO MORE HDD in Huntington Beach! We don't need it, and there are not enough resources to support it!!
Ann Tarkington
Huntington Beach

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 11/1 2022
Aganda Hom No: S8#4 (22.900)
1 Switzer, Donna
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Oppose Approval of Bella Terra 7-Story Building / Burlington Coat Factory & Brindle- Thomas Overlay
Dear Huntington Beach City Council,
Please consider delaying the vote on these two developments; Bella Terra 7 Story-Burlington Coat Factory and the Brindle Property. We have not had enough public input nor do we have the infrastructure to support these builds. This can be a project or project for the new city council to deliberate.

Respectfully,
Delaine Bailey

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:.. 11|1/2022
Agenda Item No.:_ 88#4 (22.900)
1 Switzer, Donna
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Oppose Approval of Bella Terra 7-Story Building / Burlington Coat Factory & Brindle- Thomas Overlay
Dear Huntington Beach City Council,
Please consider delaying the vote on these two developments; Bella Terra 7 Story-Burlington Coat Factory and the Brindle Property. We have not had enough public input nor do we have the infrastructure to support these builds. This can be a project or project for the new city council to deliberate.

Respectfully,
Delaine Bailey

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Mesting Date: 11|1/2022
Agenda MomMa: SS#4 (22-9040)
1 Moore, Tania
From: Keith Dean <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:33 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL
Subject: The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)
Attachments: The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP). pdf To: Huntington Beach City Council:

Response letter attached with regards to the The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP).

Keith Dean
714.747.8980 - cell
[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: 1112022
Aponda Nom Mo: 38#4 (22.906).
1 October 28, 2022
TO: Huntington Beach City Council ([email protected]) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density:

City of Huntington Beach
2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT
Figure B-10: Site Inventory
395
398 240
396 239
Legend 244
397 246 245 249
If City Boundary
a Sites Inventory L 339-448 250. 302
247 238 ''121122
248
127 182
129 137
83 231 161
126 • 160
110 -125
131-
286
384
- 254
385 387
386
388
391 389
390
We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments.

The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area.

As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element.

1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest)

3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area.

4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area.

5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive.

6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive.

We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.

We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach.

Sincerely,
Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Keith DEAN
Name:

Street Name Only/Email: trifax laus / K.DEauil @Me.com
20 Signature/Initials:

Moore, Tania
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 12:12 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: HDD
-----Original Message------
From: Jeanne Paris <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 11:36 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL <city. [email protected]>
Subject: HDD
To the City Council,
Please reconsider all HDD approvals. Clearly the people of this beautiful city have made their opinions very clear.

There appears that this mandate from Sacramento may have been faulty.

We do not have the infrastructure to move forward with these unwanted plans.

Jeanne Paris
Sent from my iPhone

SUPPLEMENTAL

COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:_ 11.1 2002
Agenda Item No.: s8tt4 (22-9020)
1