Development Impact
Fiscal Year End June 30, 2022
City of Huntington Beach
Fee Report
City of Huntington Beach
Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2022
Submitted by
Dahle Bulosan, Chief Financial Officer
Intentionally
Left
Blank
Table of Contents
i
City Council Directory ................................................................................................. I City Officials Directory ................................................................................................. III
Transmittal Letter ............................................................................................................. 1
Introduction
Legal Requirements for Development Impact Fee Reporting ...................................... 3 Description of Development Impact Fees .................................................................... 5 Development Impact Fee Master Fee Schedule .......................................................... 9
Development Impact Fee Report
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Summary ....... 11
Financial Summary Report
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee ............................ 13 Police Facilities Development Impact Fee ................................................................... 17 Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee ....................................................................... 19 Library Development Impact Fee ................................................................................. 21 Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund ...................................................................... 23 Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund .................................................................................... 25 Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program ....................................................... 27
Development Impact Fee Project Identification
CIP ............................................................................................................................... 29
Council Action
Request for Council Action December 17, 2018 .......................................................... 33 Resolution 2018-85 Amending Development Impact Fee Schedule to Include ADU .. 38 Development Impact Fee on Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) .................................... 48 Request for Council Action May 7, 2012 ...................................................................... 56 Resolution 2012-23 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report ............ 65 Ordinance 3942 – Police Facilities Development Impact Fee ...................................... 92 Ordinance 3943 – Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee ......................................... 103 Ordinance 3944 – Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program .......................... 114 Ordinance 3945 – Library Development Impact Fee ................................................... 130 Ordinance 3946 – Parkland Acquisition & Park Facilities Development Impact Fee ... 140 Ordinance 3947 – General Provisions for Development Impact Fees ......................... 151 Comparison of Current vs. Proposed Development Impact Fees ................................ 159 Master Facilities Plan .................................................................................................. 163 Development Impact Fee Calculation & Nexus Report ................................................ 259
ii
Intentionally
Left
Blank
City Council Directory
I
Barbara Delgleize
Mayor
Mayor
Mike Posey
Mayor Pro Tem
Natalie Moser
Council Member
Kim Carr
Council Member
Erik Peterson
Council Member
Rhonda Bolton
Council Member
Dan Kalmick
Council Member
II
Intentionally
Left
Blank
City Official Directory
III
Elected Officials
City Attorney ............................................................................ Michael Gates City Clerk ................................................................................. Robin Estanislau City Treasurer .......................................................................... Alisa Backstrom
City Manager’s Office
City Manager ............................................................................ Al Zelinka Assistant City Manager ............................................................ Travis Hopkins
Department Directors
Administrative Services ........................................................... Brittany Mello Community Development ........................................................ Ursula Luna-Reynosa Community & Library Services ................................................. Chris Slama Finance .................................................................................... Dahle Bulosan Fire ........................................................................................... Scott Haberle Police ....................................................................................... Eric Parra Public Works ............................................................................ Sean Crumby
IV
Intentionally
Left
Blank
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
December 20, 2022
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
The City Council approved the establishment of Development Impact Fees through the enactment of Government Code Sections 66001 through 66009. Four ordinances ha ve been adopted establishing development impact fees for Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities, Police Facili ties, Fire Facilities, and Library. The law requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an annual report providing specific information about those fees. Additionally, three Public Works facilities improvement fees – Planned Local Drainage, Sanitary Sewer Facilities, and Fair S hare Traffic Impact Mitigation Program – collected for development projects are also included in the annual compliance report requirement.
In accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code Section 66006 (b) and 66001 (d), as amended by Assembly Bill (A) 518 and Senate Bill (SB) 1693, I hereby submit the Development Impact Fee (DIF) Report for the City of Huntington Beach, California for the fiscal year (FY) ended June 30, 2022.
DIFs are charged by local governmental agencies in connection with approval of development projects.
The purpose of these fees is to defray all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project. The legal requirements for enactme nt of a DIF program are set forth in Government Code 66000-66025 (the “Mitigation Fee Act”), the bulk of which was adopted as 1987’s AB 1600 and thus commonly referred to as “AB 1600 requirements”.
DIFs are collected at the time a building permit is issue d for mitigating the impacts caused by new development on the City’s infrastructure. Fees are used to finance the acquisition, construction and improvement of public facilities needed because of this new development. A separate fund has been established to account for each of the City’s adopted DIFs.
State law requires the City prepare and make available to the public the DIF Report within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. The City Council must review the annual report at a regular schedu led public meeting not less than fifteen days after the information is made available to the public. This report was filed with the City Clerk’s office and available for public review on December 2, 2022.
Sincerely,
Dahle Bulosan
Chief Financial Officer
1 Intentionally
Left
Blank
2 Introduction
Legal Requirements for Development Impact Fee Reporting California Government Code Section 66006 (b)
California Government Code Section 66006 (b) defines the specific reporting requirements for local agencies that impose AB 1600 DIFs on new development. Annually, for each separate fund established for the collection and expenditure of DIFs, the local age ncy shall, within 180 days of the close of the fiscal year, make available to the public the information shown below for the most recent fiscal year. a) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. b) The amount of the fee.
c) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. d) The amount of the fees collected and interest earned. e) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.
f) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete. g) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including th e public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
h) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocations pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.
California Government Code Section 66001 (d)
For all funds established for the collection and expenditure of DIFs, California Government Code Section 66001 (d) has additional requirements. For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the fund and every five years thereafter, the local agency shall make all of the following findings with respect to that portion of the fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:
a) Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
b) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which it is charged. c) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). d) Designate the approximate dates on which the fundin g referred to in subparagraph (c ) is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
California Government Code Section 66002
The State of California Government Code Section 66002 states that:
a) Any local agency, which levies a fee subject to Section 66001, may adopt a capital improvement plan, which shall indicate the approximate location, size, time of availability, and estimates of cost for all facilities or improvements to be financed with the fees. 3 Introduction
California Government Code Section 66002 (Continued)
b) The capital improvement plan shall be adopted by, and shall be annually updated by, a resolution of the governing body of the local agency adopted at a noticed public hearing. Notice of the hearing shall be given pursuant to Section 65090. In addition, mailed notice shall be given to any city or county, which may be significantly affected by the capital improvement plan.
This notice shall be given no later than the date the local agency notices the public hearing pursuant to Section 65090. The information in the notice shall be not less than the information contained in the notice of public hearing and shall be given by first -class mail or personal delivery.
c) “Facility” or “improvement,” as used in this section, means any of the following:
1) Public buildings, including schools and related facilities; provided that school facilities shall not be included if Senate Bill 97 of the 1987–88 Regular Session is enacted and becomes effective on or before January 1, 1988.
2) Facilities for the storage, treatment, and distribution of nonagricultural water. 3) Facilities for the collection, treatment, reclamation, and disposal of sewage. 4) Facilities for the collection and disposal of storm waters and for flood control purposes. 5) Facilities for the generation of electricity and the distribution of gas and electricity. 6) Transportation and transit facilities, including but not limited to streets and supporting improvements, roads, overpasses, bridges, harbors, ports, airports, and related facilities.
7) Parks and recreation facilities.
8) Any other capital project identified in the capital facilities plan adopted pursuant to Section 66002.
4 Introduction
Description of Development Impact Fees
Police Facilities Development Impact Fees
Background: On June 18, 2012, the City Council approved the introduction of Ordinance No. 3942, which amended the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) by adding Chapter 17.75 relating to Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fees. The second reading of the Ordinance was approved on July 2, 2012.
Fee Description: Per HBMC 17.75.090, the funds collected from the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be used to fund the costs of providing police services attributable to new residential and nonresidential construction and shall include:
1) The costs of providing the acquisition, construction, furnishing of new buildings; 2) Purchase of new specialty equipment and vehicles
3) Development of a Master Plan to identify capital facilities; 4) The cost of financing, projects identified in the City’s General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, the C ity’s Capital Improvement Plan, or City Counci l approved development projects
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees Background: On June 18, 2012, the City Council approved the introduction of Ordinance No. 3946, which amended the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) by adding Chapter 17.76 relating to Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees. The second reading of the Ordinance was approved on July 2, 2012.
Fee Description: Per HBMC 17.76.090, the funds collected from Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be used to fund the “costs of providing the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland and park facilities development, attributable to new residential and nonresidential construction.” Therefore, the expenses included in this report represent all costs associated with the planning, design, and construction stages of an eligible project, including staffing and professional design consultant costs.
Specifically, the fees may be used as summarized below. 1) The acquisition of additional property for the expansion of parkland and community facilities development;
2) The construction of new parks and park facilities and community use facilities; 3) The funding of a master plan to identify capital facilities to serve new parkland and park facilities and community use facilities development;
4) The cost of financing, projects identified in the City’s General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, the City’s Ca pital Improvement Plan, the adopted annual City of Huntington Beach budget, or City Council approved park acquisition and development projects.
5 Introduction
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees (Continued) Since the City’s CIP generally includes projects and upgrades to existing facilities of $50,000 or more, all eligible park improvements may not meet the minimum qualifications required to be included in the City’s CIP. However, projects and improvement less than the $50,000 threshold are still eligible park expenses as long as they are included in the documents referenced in item 4 above of the City’s adopted annual budget. Examples of these types of expenditures include the City’s annual park license fees with Southern California Edison. Since these expenses are included in the City’s budget, they are eligible and included in this report.
Library Development Impact Fees
Background: On June 18, 2012, the City Council approved the introduction of Ordinance No. 3945, which amended the H untington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) by adding Chapter 17.67 relating to Library Development Impact Fees. The second reading of the Ordinance was approved on July 2, 2012.
Fee Description: Per HBMC 17.67.065, the funds collected from the Library Development Impact Fees shall be used to fund the costs of expansion of the amount of library space and the number of collection items attributed to the new residential construction and shall include:
1) The acquisition of additional property for Library construction; 2) The construction of new facilities for Library services; 3) The furnishing of new buildings or facilities for Library services; 4) The purchase of Library collections to expand collections; 5) The funding of master plan to identify capital facilities; 6) To serve new users and patrons;
7) The cost of financing, projects identified in the City’s General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, the City’s Capital Improvement Plan, or City Council approved development projects.
Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees
Background: On June 18, 2012, the City Council approved the introduction of Ordinance No. 3942, which amended the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) by adding Chapter 17.74 relating to Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees. The second reading of the Ordinance was approved on July 2, 2012.
Fee Description: Per HBMC 17.74.090, the funds collected from the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees shall be used to fund the costs of providing additional Fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment attributable to new residential and nonresidential construction and shall include:
1) The acquisition of additional property for Fire Department facilities; 2) The construction of new facilities for Fire Department services; 3) The furnishing of new buildings or facilities for Fire Department services; 4) The purchase of new specialty equipment and vehicles for Fire Department services; 5) The funding of a Master Plan to identify capital facilities to serve new Fire Department development;
6 Introduction
Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees (Continued)
6) The cost of financing projects identified in the City’s General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, the City’s Capital Improvement Plan, or City Council approved development projects.
Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program
Fee Description: The Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program (Traffic Impact Fee) is intended to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan by providing revenue to ensure that the adopted Level of Service standards for arterial roadways and signalized intersections are maintained when new development is constructed within the City limits and that these developments pay their fair share towards short and long term transportation improvements.
In accordance with Section 17.65.130 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC), the Public Works Department is required to prepare an annua l report of the status of the Traffic Im pact Fee for the City Council.
Uses of Traffic Impact Fee funds are restricted to roadway capacity projects or other projects that affect the performance of the street system to offset the impacts of traffic generated by new development.
Often, these types of projects are quite expensive and can involve right-of-way acquisition and property impacts. Staff has been developing projects to address some key roadway capacity areas in the City that are also larger scale projects. With expenditures that can be millions of dollars, staff has recommended that the Traffic Impact Fee fund accumu late a significant balance in order to make pursuit of those projects financially possible in the future. However, it is important to develop a program for fund expenditure to ensure the timely use of funds that are collected under this program.
Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund
Fee Description: The Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund (Sewer Fund) is a development fee that is restricted to use for sewer capacity enhancements. The fee is unrelated to the monthly Sewer Service Charge used for operations and maintenance of the existing sewer system. In accordance with Section
14.36.070 (d) of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC), the Public Works Department is required to prepare an annual report of the status of the Sewer Fund for the City Council.
The Sewer Fund is intended to implement the goals and objectives of the current Sewer Master Plan.
Funds collected and depos ited to the fund may be expended solely for the construction or reimbursement for construction of sanitary sewer facilities.
Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund
Fee Description: The Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund (Drainage Fund) is a dev elopment fee that is restricted to use for drainage system enhancement. In accordance with Section 14.48.050 (d) of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC), the Public Works Department is required to prepare an annual report of the status of the Drainage Fund for the City Council.
The Drainage Fund is intended to implement the goals and objectives of the current Drainage Ma ster Plan. Funds collected and deposited to the fund may be expended solely for the construction or reimbursement for construction of drainage facilities.
7 Intentionally
Left
Blank
8 I ntroduction
Master Fee Schedule
Development Impact Fees
(per Resolution 2012-23 and amended on 12/17/18 to include ADU DIF) Notes: * See Schedule Rates of Traffic Impact Fees, amended 12/17/2018 to include Accessory Dwelling Land Use
Law
Enforcement
Facilities
Fire
Suppression
Facilities
Circulation Systems
(Streets, Signals,
Bridges)
Public
Library
Facilities
Parkland/
Open Space &
Facilities
(No Tract Map)
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit) 362.05$ 844.11$ 2,385.00$ 1,179.72$ 16,554.73$ Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit) 746.48$ 349.85$ 1,597.00$ 866.48$ 12,732.84$ Accessory Dwelling Units (per Unit) 183.50$ 86.00$ * 213.00$ 3,130.00$ Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit) 337.64$ 1,449.23$ 1,248.00$ 708.85$ 10,222.88$ Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.041/SF $0.234/SF Resort Lodging Units (per Unit) No Fee No Fee $172/trip $0.041/SF $0.234/SF Commercial/Office Uses (per sq. ft.) 0.953$ 0.301$ 4.175$ N o Fee 0.897$
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq. ft.) 0.406$ 0.0275$ 1.716$ N o Fee 0.730$
9 Introduction
Master Fee Schedule
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees
(per Resolution 2012-23 and updated May 2021)
Land Use
Detached Dwelling Unit $ 2,624.30 /Unit
Apartment $ 1,843.08 /Unit
Condominium/ Townhouse $ 1,607.96 /Unit
Mobile Home Dwelling $ 1,372.83 /Unit
Hotel $ 1,812.75 /Room
All Suites Hotel $ 1,084.61 /Room
Motel $ 1,251.48 /Room
General Light Industrial $ 2,108.54 /1,000 sf
Heavy Industrial $ 2,040.29 /1,000 sf
Manufacturing $ 932.91 /1,000 sf
Warehousing $ 1,501.77 /1,000 sf
Office Park $ 2,472.61 /1,000 sf
Research Park $ 1,668.63 /1,000 sf
Business Park $ 3,117.30 /1,000 sf
Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store $ 4,785.94 /1,000 sf
Garden Center $ 3,822.69 /1,000 sf
Movie Theater $ 401.99 /1,000 sf
Church $ 963.26 /1,000 sf
Medical-Dental Office $ 7,410.25 /1,000 sf
General Office Building $ 2,389.18 /1,000 sf
Shopping Center $ 4,922.47 /1,000 sf
Hospital $ 1,865.83 /1,000 sf
Discount Center $ 10,262.09 /1,000 sf
High-Turnover Restaurant $ 1,448.67 /1,000 sf
Convenience Market $ 7,106.86 /1,000 sf
Office Park $ 2,275.41 /1,000 sf
Cemetery $ 500.58 /Acre
Service Station/Market (avg) $ 17,558.57 /Fuel Position Service Station w/Car Wash $ 16,200.91 /Fuel Position OTHER (as noted)
Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling
unit or other unit
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit)
RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door)
INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF)
COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF)
10 Development Impact Fee Report
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022 *
Development Impact Fees
* Note: Unaudited actual
Description
Parkland
Acquisition
& Park
Facilities
Police
Facilities
Fire
Facilities
Library
Facilities
Sewer
Facilities
Fund
Drainage
Facilities
Fund
Traffic
Impact
Fees
REVENUES
Fees 440,288 149,993 64,895 77,394 366,521 963,139 143,409 Interest 62,860 19,691 9,959 9,669 (179,307) (197,540) 19,058 Other Revenue 12,310 96,987
Total Revenues 503,148 169,684 74,854 87,063 199,524 765,599 259,454
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 5,176,320 83,528 2,163,140
668 534,056
Total Expenditures 5,176,320 83,528 2,163,140 668 534,056 Rev Over/(Under) Exp (4,673,172) 19,348 1,940 3,535 (1,963,616) 764,930 (274,602) Beginning Fund Balance 10,361,970 1,922,937 1,033,919 986,099 4,234,329 2,721,894 2,921,232 Ending Fund Balance 5,688,798 1,942,285 1,035,859 989,634 2,270,713 3,486,824 2,646,630 11 Intentionally
Left
Blank
12 Financial Summary Report
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees The Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee program is intended to implement the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Huntington Beach General Plans by ensuring that the City’s acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland and community facilities development are maintained when new development is constructed within the City limits (HBMC 17.76.020 (B).
Fiscal Status
This report presents the fund info rmation based on the City’s preliminary audit for Fiscal Year 20 21/22. The balance for the fund at the beginning of the fiscal year was $10,361,970. During FY 2021/22, the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund recognized $ 440,288 in impact fees paid, as well as $62,860 in interest and market adjustments for a total of $503,148.
Expenditures from the fund totaled $5,176,320 including Rodgers Seniors’ Center Site Redevelopment ($1.76 million), Bluff Top Park improvements ($1.083 million), Lake Park Reconfiguration ($725 ,000), playground equipment and accessibility improvements at Huntington Central Park and Sun View Park ($660,000), Harbor View Clubhouse Rehabilitation ($120 ,000), Edison Community Center B uilding Improvements ($107,000), Edison Park Reconfiguration design ($97,000), Bartlett Park and Huntington Central Park Trail Improvements ($82,000), Huntington Central Park Public Art ($75,000), as well as other various park improvements . The fund balance at the end of the fiscal year is $5,688,798.
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 16/17 FY 17/18^ FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22*
REVENUES
Fees 3,150,305 7,941,094 4,026,144 385,395 788,972 440,288 Interest 14,479 (29,654) 495,707 383,539 3,088 62,860 Other Revenue 50
Total Revenues 3,164,784 7,911,489 4,521,851 768,934 792,060 503,148
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 901,073 758,321 1,533,146 2,949,744 3,556,058 5,176,320 Total Expenditures 901,073 758,321 1,533,146 2,949,744 3,556,058 5,176,320 Rev Over/(Under) Exp 2,263,711 7,153,168 2,988,705 (2,180,810) (2,763,998) (4,673,172) Beginning Fund Balance 2,901,194 5,164,905 12,318,073 15,306,778 13,125,968 10,361,970 Ending Fund Balance 5,164,905 12,318,073 15,306,778 13,125,968 10,361,970 5,688,798 Note: ^Reflects a 9-month fiscal period. An increase in revenue was due to the following development.
FY 16/17 and 17/18: Pacific City and Monogram final building.
FY 18/19: Luce Apartments; Oakmont Assisted Living Facility * Unaudited actual
13 Financial Summary Report
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees (Continued) Planned Park Projects, Studies, and Expenditures
The FY 2022/23 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes funding for the following new projects:
Huntington Central Park Slater Playground Improvements ($475,000) anticipated to be completed by June 30, 2023. Additional funds have been budgeted for cont inuing design work associated with reconfiguration projects for Marina ($440,000) and Edison ($475,000) Parks. The combined total of these planned projects is $1,390,000.
Future Project and Fund Balance
Per HBMC 17.76.090 (A)(5), use of Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee funds are restricted to projects identified in the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan, the adopted annual City of Huntington Beach budget, or City Council approved park acquisition and development projects. Often, these types of projects require multiple years to plan and construct due to changing City priorities, community involvement, and the entitlement process. With expenditures totaling millions of dollars, staff recommends that the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund accumulate a significant balance in order to make pursuit of those projects financial ly possible in the future. However, it is important to develop a program for fund expenditure to ensure the timely use of funds that are collected under this program. Staff also uses Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee funds as a “matching fund” when pursuing park enhancement projects for grant funding opportunities as available.
Looking forward, other potential uses of the fund balance include construction funding for Edison Park Reconfiguration Improvements pending final appro val of a master plan anticipated to be completed during FY 2022/23. Additionally it is anticipated that the final design plans and specifications for the Marina Park Reconfiguration project would begin in FY 2023/24, with construction beginning in FY 2025 /26. Finally, continued playground ADA equipment improvements as listed on the City Council approved Park Playground & Equipment Replacement Priority List are also planned on an on-going basis as funding is available through FY 2024/25 at an estimated cost of $3.6 million.
14 Financial Summary Report
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees (Continued) Summary of Revenue and Expenditures
Parkland Acquisition & Park Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund* Beginning Balance 7/1/2021 $10,361,970
Revenue
Developer Fees (Residential) 353,199
Developer Fees (Commercial) 87,089
Others, Interest, & Adjustments 62,860
Total Revenue $503,148
Expenditures
Various Park Improvements/Monument Signs (11,030)
Park Leases (7,539)
Bartlett Park Loop Trail (70,324)
Edison Community Center Improvements (107,267)
Edison Park Reconfiguration (97,093)
Harbor View Clubhouse Rehabilitation (119,592)
HCP Group Picnic Area Reuse Improvements (614,644)
Huntington Central Library Fountain Improvements (103,127) HCP Disc Golf Course (34,850)
Lake Park Reconfiguration (725,532)
LeBard Park Improvements (27,919)
HCP Trail Improvements (16,266)
HCP Restroom Improvements (23,515)
Playground Improvements (includes $45k Sun View Park match to Prop 68) (52,119) Rodgers Seniors’ Center Redevelopment (1,755,990)
Bluff Top Park Improvements (1,082,979)
Huntington Central Park Public Art Plans (75,000)
Personnel and Professional Services (251,535)
Total Expenditures $(5,176,320)
Beginning Balance 7/1/2022 $5,688,798
*Figures are rounded to the nearest dollar
Conformance with Program Goals and Objectives
The Park Development Impact Fee Program is intended to implement the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, as stated in the Municipal Code Chapter 17.76. Completion of the planned projects is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Park Development Impact Fee program.
15 Intentionally
Left
Blank
16 Financial Summary Report
Police Facilities Development Impact Fee
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 16/17 FY 17/18^ FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22*
REVENUES
Fees 253,771 461,454 278,513 178,437 154,900 149,993 Interest 2,333 (1,198) 48,848 49,575 9,948 19,691 Total Revenues 256,104 460,256 327,361 228,012 164,848 169,684
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 150,336
Total Expenditures 150,336
Rev Over/(Under) Exp 256,104 460,256 327,361 228,012 164,848 19,348 Beginning Fund Balance 486,356 742,460 1,202,716 1,530,077 1,758,089 1,922,937 Ending Fund Balance 742,460 1,202,716 1,530,077 1,758,089 1,922,937 1,942,285
Note: ^Reflects a 9-month fiscal period.
*Unaudited actual
Police Facilities Development Impact Fees of $149,993 and $19,691 in interest/bank adjustments were posted in FY 2021/22. Expenditures during Fiscal Year 2021/22 totaled $150,336 for PD Communications Center and Traffic Office reconfigurations, start-up equipment for the Be Well OC Program, and a transit van for the Crisis Negotiation Team (CNT).
The Police Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund reports funds being held past the fifth year and first deposit. These funds are intended for the projects identified in the DIF Project Identification section of this annual compliance report.
17 Intentionally
Left
Blank
18 Financial Summary Report
Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 16/17 FY 17/18^ FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22*
REVENUES
Fees 104,346 225,915 156,211 98,953 99,561 64,895 Interest 1,314 (552) 25,418 27,274 5,042 9,959 Total Revenues 105,660 225,363 181,629 126,227 104,603 74,854
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 72,914
Total Expenditures 72,914
Rev Over/(Under) Exp 105,660 225,363 181,629 126,227 104,603 1,940 Beginning Fund Balance 290,437 396,097 621,460 803,089 929,316 1,033,919 Ending Fund Balance 396,097 621,460 803,089 929,316 1,033,919 1,035,859
Note: ^Reflects a 9-month fiscal period.
*Unaudited actual
Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees of $64,895 and $9,959 in interest/bank adjustments were posted in FY 2021/22. Expenditures totaled $72,914 for a Fire facilities assessment and standards of cover study.
The Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund reports funds being held past the fifth year and first deposit.
These funds are intended for the projects identified in the DIF Project Identification section of this annual compliance report.
19 Intentionally
Left
Blank
20 Financial Summary Report
Library Development Impact Fee
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 16/17 FY 17/18^ FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22
REVENUES
Fees 208,080 532,513 313,292 128,248 104,298 77,394 Interest 1,651 (1,842) 40,351 36,229 1,084 9,669 Total Revenues 209,731 530,671 353,643 164,477 105,382 87,063
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 53,806 50,313 125,856 156,639 349,272 83,528 Total Expenditures 53,806 50,313 125,856 156,639 349,272 83,528 Rev Over/(Under) Exp 155,925 480,358 227,787 7,838 (243,890) 3,535 Beginning Fund Balance 358,080 514,005 994,363 1,222,150 1,229,988 986,099 Ending Fund Balance 514,005 994,363 1,222,150 1,229,988 986,098 989,634
Note: ^Reflects a 9-month fiscal period.
*Unaudited actual
Library Development Impact Fees of $ 77,394 and interest/bank adjustment s of $9,669 were posted in FY 2021/22. Expenditures incurred in FY 2021/22 include professional services charges for the development of the Library Facilities Master Plan ($83,528).
21 Intentionally
Left
Blank
22 Financial Summary Report
Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 16/17 FY 17/18^ FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22*
REVENUES
Fees 58,004 72,646 429,294 703,122 217,735 963,138 Interest 5,648 4,055 53,429 74,100 12,285 (197,540) Other Revenue (386)
Total Revenues 63,652 76,701 482,337 777,222 230,020 765,598
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 63,795 236,119 26,749 668
Total Expenditures 63,795 236,119 26,749 668 Rev Over/(Under) Exp (143) (159,418) 482,337 777,222 203,271 764,930 Beginning Fund Balance 1,418,625 1,418,482 1,259,064 1,741,401 2,518,623 2,721,894 Ending Fund Balance 1,418,482 1,259,064 1,741,401 2,518,623 2,721,894 3,486,824
Note: ^Reflects a 9-month fiscal period.
*Unaudited actual
Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund revenues for FY 2021/22 include $963,138 of development fees plus negative interest/bank adjustments ($197,540) for a total of $765,598. Expenditures in the fund totaled $668 for engineering work on the McCallen Storm Drain Project.
The Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund reports funds being held past the fifth year and first deposit. These funds are intended for the projects identified in the DIF Project Identification section of this annual compliance report.
23 Intentionally
Left
Blank
24 Financial Summary Report
Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 16/17 FY 17/18^ FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22*
REVENUES
Fees 38,582 180,456 215,496 405,790 92,206 366,521 Interest 31,458 17,063 257,329 188,404 (179,307) Other Revenue 12,310 45,058 (2,214) 12,310 12,310 12,310 Total Revenues 82,350 242,577 470,611 606,504 104,516 199,524
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 159,127 341,264 1,898,104 85,394 2,954,357 2,163,140 Total Expenditures 159,127 341,264 1,898,104 85,394 2,954,357 2,163,140 Rev Over/(Under) Exp (76,777) (98,687) (1,427,493) 521,110 (2,849,841) (1,963,616) Beginning Fund Balance 8,166,017 8,089,240 7,990,553 6,563,060 7,084,170 4,234,329 Ending Fund Balance 8,089,240 7,990,553 6,563,060 7,084,170 4,234,329 2,270,713
Note: ^Reflects a 9-month fiscal period.
*Unaudited actual
FY 2021/22 Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund revenues totaled $199,524. Residential and commercial developer fees contributed $366,521 . In addition, the City received $12,310 from the Sunset Beach Sanitary District representing the agency’s share for the construction of Lift Station D. These revenues were partially offset by negative interest/bank adjustments of ($179,307).
Expenditures for the fund i n FY 2021/22 totaled $2,163,140 and includes o ngoing construction costs at Saybrook Lift Station in the amount of $1,234,177, ongoing construction costs at Slater L ift station in the amount of $705,799, and final engineering and beginning construction cost at McFadden Lift Station totaled in the amount of $223,164. It should be noted that these projects are also partially funded by the Sewer Service Fund.
The Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund reports funds being held past the fifth year and first deposit. These funds are intended for the projects identified in the DIF Project Identification section of this annual compliance report.
25 Intentionally
Left
Blank
26 Financial Summary Report
Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Five Fiscal Years
Description FY 16/17 FY 17/18^ FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22*
REVENUES
Fees 436,630 713,993 588,763 564,171 225,314 143,409 Interest 15,788 6,049 150,937 83,723 8,706 19,058 Other Revenue 362,078 70 (1,088) 106 96,987 Total Revenues 814,496 720,112 738,612 647,894 234,126 259,454
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures 610,801 90,191 914,922 2,157,222 52,308 534,056 Total Expenditures 610,801 90,191 914,922 2,157,222 52,308 534,056 Rev Over/(Under) Exp 203,695 629,921 (176,310) (1,509,328) 181,818 (274,602) Beginning Fund Balance 3,591,436 3,795,131 4,425,052 4,248,742 2,739,414 2,921,232 Ending Fund Balance 3,795,131 4,425,052 4,248,742 2,739,414 2,921,232 2,646,630
Note: ^Reflects a 9-month fiscal period.
*Unaudited actual
During FY 2021/22, the Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Fund recognized revenues of $143,409 in impact fees paid plus $19,058 in interest/bank adjustments. Other Revenues include a transfer in from the Gas Tax Fund in the amount of $3,595 and a transfer in from the Prop 42 Fund in the amount of $93,392 due to accounting adjustments posted to close out various traffic signal grants. Revenues for the fund total $259,454.
Expenditures include traffic signal modifications at the intersections of Warner -Graham ($170,483), Main - Delaware ($53,293), and Warner-Ash ($47,461); design work on Bushard Fire Station fiber optic line ($4,420); Citywide Mobility Corridor Improvements ($228,695) and general traffic signal repairs ($29,704). Expenditures for the year totaled $534,056.
27 Intentionally
Left
Blank
28 Development Impact Fee Project Identification
The City’s current, Adopted Budget 2022-2023, which includes the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2022/23 – 2026/27 can be found on the City’s website at:
https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/files/users/finance/Adopted-Budget-2022-2023.pdf Funding of Infrastructure
The FY 2022/23 – FY 2026/27 CIP identifies all funding sources and amounts for individual projects through FY 2026/27. The CIP is updated annually to reflect the current City’s infrastructure needs. As a CIP is identified, the project is evaluated to determine the portion of the project that will service existing residents and businesses versus new development.
Once the determination of use is made, the percentage of use attributed to new development is then funded by the appropriate development fee based on the type of project. T he percentage of use associated with existing residents or businesses are funded from other appropriate sources. Estimated construction start dates for projects are adjusted, as needed, to reflect the needs of the community.
CURRENT MAJOR CIP PROJECTS
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees New park development projects included in the Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2022/23 include the design and construction of various park improvements as listed below. Funds are also budgeted for park leases, professional services, and personnel services.
FY 2022/23
Edison Park Reconfiguration Design Services - $475.000
This multi-year project includes the reconfiguration of Edison Park to include dual use tennis/pickleball courts, repurposing of group picnic area, soccer fields, tot lot playground improvements, walkways, parking lot rehabilitation, turf and irrigation improvements as well as other possible amenities based on the master planning process currently underway. A total of $300,000 was appropriated in FY 21/22 and $475,000 in FY 22/23.
Huntington Central Park Slater Playground Improvements - $475,000 This project includes replacement and rehabilitation of playground equipment with ADA compliant all new units and safety surfacing throughout the playground area.
Marina Park Conceptual Design Reconfiguration Design Services - $440,000 This multi-year project includes the preparation of a conceptual master plan and design services to update the park, including renovation of existing restroom/snack bar building, tennis courts, and potential repurposing of hardscape areas and other park amenities.
FY 2023/24
Preliminary projects to include partial funding for Edison Park design and construction documents pending final approval of a master plan, as well as Carr Park reconfiguration design services. Other preliminary projects include the continuation of various playground equipment and site turf improvements as needed throughout the city in order to comply with ADA requirements.
FY 2024/25
Preliminary projects include the continuation of playground equipment rehabilitation at various parks as listed on the City Council approved Park Playground & Equipment Replacement Priority List, as well as future projects as recommended in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan update currently underway. 29 Development Impact Fee Project Identification
Police Facilities Development Impact Fees
The Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2022/23 includes the following projects funded by Police Facilities Development Impact Fees:
Traffic Office Remodel - $415,000
The traffic department consists of old modular walls that are not configured to accommodate current employees and workflow. The project includes renovation and refurbishment of the Traffic Bureau interior of the Police Department and complete redesign of interior walls and workspace.
Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees
The Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2022/23 includes the construction for reconfiguration and renovation of Fire Station #5 (Lake) and Fire Station #2 (Murdy). This project is needed for gender accommodation, in addition to better use of space to accommodate personnel and services in Fire Department facilities. The project includes professional services contracts for assessments of Fire Department facilities.
The Fire Facilities Devel opment Fees are eligible for expenditures related to providing additional Fire suppression and medic facilities, vehicles and equipment associated with residential and nonresidential construction. The Master Facilities Plan for the City of Huntington Beac h, adopted in October 2011, identifies the following eligible projects:
Relocate Fire Station #8 (Heil)
Construct Station #8 (Heil) Apparatus Storage Facility
Construct a Single Bay/Quarters at Station #4 (Magnolia) Acquire an Engine and Ambulance and for Station #4 (Magnolia) Acquire an Additional Engine for Station #1 (Gothard)
Acquire an Additional Engine for Station #2 (Murdy)
These projects will be evaluated and considered for submission in the FY 2023/24 budget process.
Library Development Impact Fees
The Library Development Impact Fees are eligible for expenditures related to costs for expanded or new library spaces and the number of collection items attributed to new residential construction. Proposed use of funds include $350,000 for conceptual design services for the Central Library’s Children-Teen wing included in the City’s FY 2022/23 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It is anticipated that future funds will be allocated to this project, as well as other library facility rehabilitation and expansion projects as recommended in the Library Facilities Master Plan currently underway.
Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund
The FY 2022/23 Capital Improvement Plan includes $700,000 in carryover funds from FY 2021/22 for the rehabilitation/upgrade of Humboldt Sewer Lift Station and $1.2 million in carryover funds for the rehabilitation/upgrade of McFadden Sewer Lift Station , with the prioritization of future lift stations to be determined in future fiscal years.
30 Development Impact Fee Project Identification
Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund
The Capital Improvement Plan for FY 2022/23 through FY 2026/27 includes $2.0 million for reconstruction of Heil Avenue Storm Water Pump Station, $120,000 for repairs to Channel C6 SC1, $1.2 million for storm drain pump station forebay improvements, and $1.13 million for the installation of half round grates at various locations throughout the City.
Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program
The FY 2022/23 Capital Improvement plan includes a total of $290,000 of projects to be funded from Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees. This project is for the installation of a new traffic signal at the Heil Avenue Fire Station, which will improve safety by enabling the Fire Department to stop traffic on Heil Avenue while egressing the station.
31 Intentionally
Left
Blank
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42
Resolution No. 2018- 85
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees
per Resolution 2012- 23 and amended on 12/ 17/ 18 to include ADU DIF) Adjusted Average Trip - end to Additional Cost per Cost per 1000 sq. ft, Land Use Trip Ends Distance Trip Trip Miles Trip Mile dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES ( per Unit)
Detached Dwelling Unit 8. 76 7. 9 0. 5
Apartment 6. 15 7. 9 0. 5
Condominium/
5. 36 7. 9 0. 5
Townhouse
Accessory Dwelling
Mobile Home Dwelling 4. 57 7. 9
RESORT/ TOURIST ( per Unit or Entry Door)
Hotel 6. 29 7. 6
All Suites Hotel 3. 77 7. 6
Motel 4. 34 7. 6
INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF)
General Light Industrial
0. 1/
Heavy Industrial 5. 97
Manufacturing 2. 73
Warehousing 4. 39
COMMERCIAL ( per 1,000 SF)
Office Park 7. 42
Research Park 5. 01
Business Park 9. 34
Bldg. Materials/ Lumber
Store
Garden Center
Movie Theater
Church
Medical - Dental Office
General Office Building
Shopping Center
Hospital
Discount Center
High - Turnover
Restaurant
Convenience Market
Office Park
OTHER ( as noted)
Cemetery
Service Station/ Market
avg)
Service Station w/ Car
0. 5
0. 5
0. 5
0. 5
0. 5
0. 5
0. 5
0. 5
34. 6 $ 64. 34 $
24. 3 $ 64. 34 $
21. 2 $ 64. 34 $
18. 1 $ 64. 34 $
23. 9 $ 64. 34 $
14. 3 $ 64. 34 $
16. 5 $ 64. 34 $
27. 8 64. 34
26. 9 64. 34
12. 3 64. 34
19. 8 64. 34
8. 8 0.51 32. 6 64. 341 $
8. 8 0. 5 22. 0 64. 34
8. 8 0.51 41. 1 64. 34
4. 31 0. 5 63. 11 $ 64. 34 1 $
23. 45 4. 3 0. 5 50. 4 64. 34
2. 47 4. 3 0. 5 5. 3 64. 34
5. 92 4. 3 0. 5 12. 7 64. 34
22. 21 8. 8 0. 5 97. 7 64. 34
7. 16 8. 8 0. 5 31. 5 64. 34
30. 2 4. 3 0. 5 64. 9 64. 34
11. 42 4. 3 0. 5 24. 6 64. 34
62. 93 4. 3 0. 5 135. 3 64. 34
8. 9 4. 3 0. 5 19. 1 64. 34
43.571 4.31 0. 5 93. 7 64. 34
13.971 4.31 0. 51 30. 0 64. 34
3. 07 4. 3
107. 69 4. 3
99. 35 4. 3
2, 226. 16 / Unit
1, 563. 46 Unit
1, 364. 01 Unit
341. 00 Unit
1, 164. 55 Unit
1, 537. 73 / Room
920. 06 / Room
1, 061. 61 / Room
1, 788. 65 / 1, 000 sf
1, 730. 75 / 1, 000 sf
791. 38 / 1, 000 sf
1, 273. 93 / 1, 000 sf
2, 097. 48 / 1, 000 sf
1, 415. 48 / 1, 000 sf
2, 644. 37 / 1, 000 sf
4. 059. 85 1 / 1. 000 sf
3, 242. 74 1, 000 sf
341. 00 1, 000 sf
817. 12 1, 000 sf
6, 286. 02 1, 000 sf
2, 026. 71 1, 000 sf
4, 175. 67 1, 000 sf
1, 582. 76 1, 000 sf
8, 705. 20 1, 000 sf
1, 228. 89 1, 000 sf
6, 028. 66 1, 000 sf
1. 930. 20 1. 000 sf
0. 5 6. 6 $ 64. 34 $ 424. 64 / Acre
Fuel
0. 5 231. 5 $ 64. 34 $ 14,894.71 Position
Fuel
0. 5 213. 6 $ 64. 34 $ 13,743.02 Position
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 City of Huntington BeachAccessoryDwelling Unit DIFCalculation Report December, 2018 impact. Therefore, to be conservative, it is recommended that the City adopt an ADU fee that is only 25% of the attached dwelling unit DIF. This action would recognize that an individual ADU will have some impact on City services but would allow the City to recognize the State Legislature' s encouragement that cities and counties consider the spirit/ intent of the new ADU laws, that is to create additional smaller housing supply alternatives without overwhelming financial barriers.
The fee has to be separated into the five individual impact fees identified in the 2012 report and resolution. Table 1, following, demonstrates this.
Table 1- 1
Calculation of an Attached Dwelling Unit
Per Imposed Infrastructure - based Development Impact Fee Infrastructure
Calculated
Development
Impact Fee
Percent
of DIF
Imposed
Adopted
Impact
Fee/ Unit
City Staff
Recommended
Percentage
DIF Impact
Cost Per
ADU
Law Enforcement 815 90. 1 % 734 25. 0% 183. 50
Fire Suppression 382 90. 1 % 344 25. 0% 86. 00
Circulation System 1, 657 96. 4% 1, 597 25. 0% 399. 25
Storm Drainage 397 0. 0% 0 25. 0% 0. 00
Library Facilities 908 93. 8% 852 25. 0% 213. 00
Park Land et. al. 13, 835 90. 5% 12, 520 25. 0% 3, 130. 00 Total 17, 994 89. 2% 16, 047 25. 0% 4, 011. 75
The five required Government Code § 66000 findings within each chapter would apply to the imposition/ collection of ADUs DIFs also. The fees collected would be used to finance the same projects specifically identified in each corresponding infrastructure chapter in the 2012 DIF Calculation and Nexus Report.
The portion of the DIF proceeds for Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Infrastructure ( about 4. 6% of the total) would be limited to projects identified on Schedule 3. 1, page 37 of the 2012 DIF Calculation and Nexus Report or pages 6 through 9 of the accompanying 2012 Master Facilities Plan.
The portion of the DIF proceeds for Fire Suppression/ Medic Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment infrastructure ( about 2. 1% of the total) would be limited to projects identified on Schedule 4. 1, page 51 of the 2012 DIF Calculation and Nexus Report or pages 12 through 17 of the accompanying 2012 Master Facilities Plan.
Revenue and Cost Service, LLC, Fullerton CA, 92831 7
833
54 55
Council/Agency Meeting Held:
ALAALOIL_d___ Deferred/Continued to: 6/4'/41,91, ,6hi://a) U Approved 1:1 Conditionally Approved 0 Denied 0/LetPCity ler ignat f Council Meeting Date: May 7, 2012 Department ID Number: PL 2012-007
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager
Revise the City's Existing Development Impact Fees by adopting Resolution No. 2012-23 and Ordinance Nos. 3942 through 3947 Statement of Issue:
Transmitted for City Council consideration are revisions to the City's existing Development Impact Fees. With the assistance of Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. staff has evaluated the City's public services needs for the next twenty years and analyzed what the future development opportunities were based on General Plan land use. From that Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. compared the future City's needs with the potential build out and derived these revised/new Development Impact Fees included in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report.
Financial Impact:
Adoption of the recommended impact fees (new and updates) will generate approximately $154.8 million through General Plan Build-out. This represents an approximately $20 million increase over the currently adopted impact fees.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
A) Adopt Resolution No. 2012 - 23, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Adopting the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach, and Establishing New and Revised Development Impact Fees For All Development Within the City;" and,
B) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3942, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 17.75 Relating to Development Impact Fees for Police Facilities;" and,
C) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3943, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 17.74 Relating to Development Impact Fees for Fire Facilities;" and,
D) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3944, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 17.65 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Relating to Traffic Impact Fees;" and,
Item 9. - I
HB -136-
56 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 E) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3945, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Deleting Chapter 17.66 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and Adding Chapter
17.67 Relating to Library Development Impact Fees;" and, F) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3946, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 17.76 Relating to Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees;" and, G) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3947, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 17.73 Relating to the General Provisions for Development Impact Fees."
Alternative Action(s):
The City Council may make the following alternative motions:
1. Do not adopt Resolution #2012-23 and Ordinances #3942-3947, updating the proposed development impact fees leaving fees at current levels.
2. Make changes to the recommended fees and adopt as amended.
3. Continue the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis:
BACKGROUND
Development Impact fees are one-time charges applied to offset the additional public-service costs of new development. Fees are proposed to be assessed at the time a building permit is issued and rededicated to providing additional services, such as water and sewer systems, roads, libraries, and parks and recreation facilities, made necessary by the increase in number of new residents in the area. The funds cannot be used for operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of existing capital facilities. The amount of the proposed fee is clearly linked to the added service cost.
The development community has requested that the City of Huntington Beach make it easier for potential developers to calculate all impact fees from the early design stage of their project and to defer payment of the development impact fees to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or Final Building Permit Approval.
The actions in this report address only Development Impact Fees. Fees charged under the Subdivision Map Act will be addressed separately at a later date. These fees are Quimby and Drainage fees.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
The City of Huntington Beach is getting close to full build-out and development of the remaining vacant parcels as well as renovation/construction of existing homes and businesses.
New development results in increased demand that must be absorbed by the existing HB -137- Item 9. - 2
57 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 infrastructure. Currently the city collects development impact fees for traffic, library development, and park land/open space. Working with staff, Revenue & Cost Specialist, L.L.C. generated a Master Facilities Plan for theoretical General Plan build-out of the City. The Master Facilities Plan indentifies all growth-related capital projects required to accommodate new City development through General Plan build-out. Using information in the Master Facilities Plan, a Development Impact Fee Calculation Report was generated. The purpose of the report is to assure that the impacts created by new development pays a fair share of the proportional costs required for expansion of all development within the City of Huntington Beach.
On April 27, 2012 the Nexus report dated October 2011 was amended. Due to additional costs associated with the accounting, collection and state mandated tracking Park Land/Open Space Fee and the Public Meeting Facilities fee were collapsed into one fee, now called the Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Fee. This was undertaken to provide the City greater flexibility to address the City's capital project needs and priorities over time.
The Development Impact Report contemplates two new fees, police and fire, and updates the existing traffic, library, and park land/open space impact fees (Attachment No. 1) based on the City's changing requirement for public safety, streets and signals and other quality-of-life facilities. Attachment No. 9 is a comparison of current impact fees and proposed impact fees.
The paragraphs to follow provide additional, detailed analysis of the changes sought to each type of fee.
Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment Fee (New) The purpose of the new Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Fee is to collect proportional contributions from new development to pay for additional required law enforcement facilities, vehicles and equipment. New development can be expected to generate additional law enforcement calls for service. Different types of development will create proportional levels of calls for service that generate law enforcement response.
Additional sworn officers are necessary to respond to the increased demands for service and these fees will offset the added costs of housing and equipping the additional required officers.
The proposed resolution establishes the actual amount of the new Law Enforcement Development Impact Fee. The resolution also specifies that the proposed fees be used solely for expanding or increasing capacity within the law enforcement facilities and to increase the number of enforcement vehicles and specialty equipment.
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities Vehicles and Equipment Fee (New) The purpose of this new fee is to provide proportional financial contributions as a result of new development to pay for additional fire suppression/emergency medical response facilities, vehicles and specialized equipment. In order to be able to continue to respond to an ever- increasing number of expected emergency calls, fire department staff has determined the need for the relocation of one fire station (as opposed to adding a ninth) and expanding one existing fire station. Having the right type and inventory of fire stations in the right locations enables the City's policy makers to house firefighters, apparatus and equipment to provide for maximum use of resources.
Item 9. - 3 HB -138-
58 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 The proposed resolution establishes the actual amount of the Fair Share Fire Department Impact Fee. The resolution specifies that the proposed fees would be used solely to acquire additional fire facilities, vehicles and specialized equipment required to respond to additional calls for service (related to the new development) necessary to maintain the capability of responding to calls to the existing community. Fees will be used to finance the construction or acquisition of fire suppression/emergency medical facilities, vehicles and specialized equipment identified in the Master Facilities Plan that are necessary to accommodate anticipated and planned development in the community.
Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Fee (Updated) The Fair Share Traffic Impact Fee collects proportional contributions from new development to pay for additional circulation system capacity by creating more travel lanes or more efficient street use to accommodate the additional trip-miles created by new development.
Improvements take the form of construction of new travel lanes including the widening of streets, installation and modification of traffic signals to accommodate changes in traffic patterns and improving the infrastructure of our traffic signal system to enable development of better signal coordination. Improvements for pedestrians, bicycles and transit may also be included in these improvements.
The current Traffic Impact Fee is $172 per net new trip generated by a proposed development.
The recommended update to the Traffic Impact Fee slightly modifies the methodology for proportioning the cost to users, resulting in slightly increased fees for some uses and slightly lower fees for others. In general, the recommended methodology shifts fees from commercial uses to residential uses. The new methodology better reflects the actual impacts to the street system by not only accounting for the number of trips generated by the land use, but also the average length of the trip. This approach is based on the concept that a longer trip has greater potential to impact multiple locations within the circulation system.
The proposed methodology is predicated on distributing the estimated $23,867,660 in circulation system improvement costs needed to serve additional traffic generated by new development. This process results in a "per unit" fee which can be assessed on new development. The "per unit" fee is developed based on typical trip generation rates for specific uses and also factors in the average length of a trip associated with that type of use. The "per unit" fee reflects the prorated fair share costs of improvements based on the number of trip- miles generated by the particular land use category. Rates recommended for adoption are based on a daily trip-mile of $64.34. This represents 10% less than the amount recommended in the Development Impact Fee Calculation Report due to the elimination of approximately $2.7 million in maintenance facility and equipment costs previously included in the calculation.
The current Traffic Impact Fee was established using a fair share methodology based only on the number of trips generated by a particular land use. The following example is presented to generally describe the difference in methodology:
If a typical single family home generates 8.8 trips per day the Traffic Impact Fee under the current program ($172 per trip) is $1,513.
If a medium sized shopping center generates 30 trips/1000 square feet of floor area the Traffic Impact Fee under the current program is $5,160/1000 sf.
HB -139- Item 9. - 4
59 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 Under the current program, with a trip length factor included (3.95 miles/trip for residential and
2.15 miles per trip for shopping center) the rates change to $2,482/dwelling unit and $4,655/1000 sf of floor area for the shopping center. While 1,000 square feet of floor area in a shopping center generates more than 3 times the number of trips of one single family home, the shopping center only generates approximately 85% more trip miles.
The resolution specifies that the proposed fees would be used solely for circulation system capacity improvements. This information is generally identified in Use of the Fee section the report.
The ordinance modifications are necessary to revise Chapter 17.65 so that the collection of fees imposed on development projects is consistent with the intent of the City Council to impose fees on residential, commercial and industrial development projects.
Public Library Facilities and Collection Fee (Updated)
The current Library Development fee was initially adopted in 1998. A Library Facilities Impact Fee imposed on residential development would allow the City to expand on existing facilities to ensure the City's existing and new residents have adequate and sufficient access to enjoy the library space and collections. The City of Huntington Beach, through its General Plan, and Facility Master Plan has established its commitment to maintaining current standards of library services. The Library Development Fee, along with other City revenue sources, will allow the City to expand facilities and enhance collections to accommodate projected growth and increased demand for service.
The development of any acreage zoned for residential use increases the demand on the finite amount of library space and collection items. Thus, those residential land uses that generate a higher number of residents will pay a proportionally higher amount. There is no information available demonstrating a substantive link between library use and local businesses. Library use is primarily by residents as opposed to business persons. Therefore, there are no fees being collected for commercial or industrial construction.
The resolution specifies that the fees would be used solely for support of library services and facilities. Funds collected from the Public Library Fee shall be used to cover the cost of expansion of library space and collection items needed to meet the increased demands of residential growth and development. Funds can be used to acquire additional property, construct new facilities, furnish new buildings or facilities, purchase collection materials, funding for master plans or other studies to identify capital needs and the cost of financing.
Funds shall not be used for periodic or routine maintenance or to maintain or repair existing facilities.
Ordinance modifications are necessary to revise Chapter 17.66 so that the collection of fees imposed on development projects is consistent with the intent of the City Council to impose fees on residential, commercial and industrial development projects.
Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Fee (Updated) On December 16, 2002 The City Council adopted Resolution 2001-129 with findings that stated, "the purpose of the fee is for the development and improvements of the City's parks and recreational facilities in order to assure that the policies and standards for park, open space and recreational facilities contained in the City's General Plan and described in the Park Fee Study are met."
Item 9. - 5
HB -140-
60 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 The proposed fees presented herein do not change this approved purpose, but merely update the methodology used in calculating the fee based on the latest land values, future population, and build-out projections cited in the new "Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report" completed by Revenue and Cost Specialists L.L.C. in October 2011.
As referenced in the October 2011 report, the City owns or has long-term control of 778.41 acres of traditional park land, with about 87.9% developed. It is anticipated that the City will need to acquire 70.5 acres in park land to serve the additional projected 17,089 residents at build-out. The challenge facing the City is to provide new facilities and park land to serve the recreational needs of new residents.
The proposed fees are based on the estimated per acre acquisition and development costs as presented in Schedule 9.1 factored by the City's existing park standards, and then multiplied by the average number of persons per type of dwelling unit.
Currently this fee is $0.86 per square foot and applies to all new residential development (new construction and additions) the fee is paid at the time of permit issuance for all new residential development. The proposed fee will apply to new residential units only; it will no longer apply to residential room additions or expansions. This will result in an elimination of the per square foot fee for residential development, however a square foot fee will continue to be applied to all non-residential development. In addition, it should be noted that currently Ordinance No. 3596 of Chapter 254 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance exempts mobile homes from Park Impact fees. The proposed fees would require the payment of $11,169 per mobile home dwelling unit. However, in an effort to implement the proposed fees in a timely manner and since there no applications on file for approval of a mobile home park, staff is recommending that the mobile home exemption be extended until such time that Ordinance No. 3596 can be revised to reflect the new fees.
Projected population increases will also place additional demands on existing community centers, and other community use facilities (such as the City's clubhouses, the Beach Public Service Center, Shipley Nature Center, etc). The Park Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Fee will enable the City to meet the added demands created by the construction of additional residential dwelling units to maintain the current standard of 0.620 square feet per person for the Public Facility use space.
IMPLEMENTATION
In order to mitigate the impact of increasing Law Enforcement Facilities Fee, Fire Suppression Facilities Fee, Circulation System Fee, and the Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Fee, the proposed resolution is to have a "phased" implementation for the detached, attached and mobile home residential unit fees. The Public Library Fee will not be phased in. While the goal is to generate adequate funding to serve the increased demands of development, the phased implementation would allow for a more gradual increase over a three year period and not inhibit development in a difficult economy.
That is, the phased approach would increase the detached, attached and mobile home residential unit to 70% of recommended fee in the first year beginning July 20, 2012, then increasing to 80% effective July 20, 2013, reaching 90% on July 20, 2014, and remaining at 90% of the recommendation. Beginning in March 2016, a CPI adjustment factor would be used to adjust those fees until a new study is funded. Using a Detached Dwelling as an example, HB -141- Item 9. - 6
61 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 the total development impact fee 100% recovery amount of $22,829 would not be implemented. Beginning July 20, 2012, the amount would be $16,331/unit. On July 20, 2013 the fee would increase to $18,499/unit. On July 20, 2014, the fee would be $20,655 and would remain at the 90% level.
Currently, all fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance. It is recommended that the fees be collected at the time the impact is imposed on the system; therefore later in the development process at final building permit approval or issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
Regarding development projects that have already received zoning entitlement approval (i.e., CUP, SPR, Variances, etc), there is proposed to be a "grandfathering" of existing development impact fees. Section 8, Fees Imposed, of the Fee Resolution (Attachment No. 1) describes the criteria for being "grandfathered" which basically states that new development impact fees shall not apply to those development projects that have received discretionary project entitlement approval on or before May 7, 2012 and the following milestones are met:
1. Project has submitted an approved application for building permits within 180 days after the fee going into effect or no later than January 20, 2013.
2. From the time of initial building permit application, the project makes continued progress toward satisfying plan check comments.
3. Building Permits are issued within 360 days after the fees go into effect, no later than July 20, 2013.
An exception to these milestones is when there is involvement by an outside third party regulatory agency. In such cases the 180 days to make building permit application will begin when the developer receives clearance from that agency. All other projects are subject to the new fees, which go into effect July 20, 2012
SUMMARY
Staff is recommending approval of the proposed resolution and ordinances based on the following reasons:
• The per unit fee established herein allows developers to easily calculate development impact fees
• The fees established herein meet the City's changing requirement for public safety, streets and signals, storm drainage and other quality of life facilities • Allows for payment of Developer Impact fees at the time the impact is imposed on the system, therefore later in the development process.
Environmental Status:
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Goal:
Improve the City's infrastructure
Item 9. - 7 HB -142-
62 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 Attachment(s):
., esc:ption
1. Resolution No. 2012 - 23 "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adopting the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach, and establishing new and revised Development Impact Fees."
2. Ordinance No. 3942 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.75 relating to Development Impact Fees for Police Facilities ."
3. Ordinance No. 3943 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.74 relating to Development Impact Fees for Fire Facilities."
4. Ordinance No. 3944 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending Chapter 17.65 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Traffic Impact Fees."
5. Ordinance No. 3945 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting Chapter
17.66 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and adding Chapter 17.67 relating to Library Development Impact Fees."
6. Ordinance No. 3946 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.76 relating to Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees."
7. Ordinance No. 3947 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.73 relating to the General Provisions for Development Impact Fees."
8. Comparison of Current vs. Proposed Development Impact Fees
9. Master Facilities Plan, prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C.
October 2011, (Amended April 27, 2012)
10. Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.0 October 2011, (Amended April 27, 2012) 63 ATTACHMENT #1
64 RESOLUTION NO, 2012-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION AND NEXUS REPORT
FOR THE CITY OF HUNTING TON BEACH, AND ESTABLISHING NEW AND REVISED
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY WHEREAS, several policies within the City's General Plan require that new development mitigate its share of the impacts to the natural and built environments and be fiscally neutral so as to not result in a net economic loss for the City; and Such General Plan policies include the maintenance of existing quality of life, maintenance of existing service levels and funding of new facilities, the requirement of new development to mitigate a fair share of its impacts, and calling for the use of impact fees to fund needed improvements to serve new development, among other policies; and In accordance with these General Plan policies, the City Council has directed staff in the past to create development impact fees in accordance with State law. Said impact fees were codified in Chapter 17.65 and Chapter 17.66 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code as well as Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Chapter 230.20. Pursuant to each ordinance set forth above, the amount of the development impact fee is to be set and/or updated by resolution of the City Council; and
Subsequently, and periodically, staff has conducted comprehensive reviews of the City's development impact fees to determine whether those fees are adequate to defray the cost of public facilities related to new development; those fees are set forth in Resolutions 6164, 2006- 23, 2000-97, 2004-88, 99-60 and 96-71; 2002-129, 2004-88 and The City contracted with Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC to provide a updated comprehensive evaluation of the City's existing development impact fees; and Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC prepared a report, entitled Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach, dated October, 2011 as amended April 27, 2012 (the "Nexus Report"), that provides an evaluation of existing development impact fees, recommends an increase and change in methodology in certain development impact fees, the creation of new impact fees and establishes the nexus between the imposition of such impact fees and the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fees are charged; and
The Nexus Report has been available for public review and comment; and The Nexus Report substantiates the need for a modification to existing fees to change certain methodology as well as creation of new impact fees; and 1 12-3209.006/79289
65 Resolution No. 2012-23
The City has collected development impact fees to mitigate the impacts of new development, including fees for transportation, park land acquisition and development, library and other public facilities since the adoption of the respective ordinances and resolutions; and The City Council desires to repeal certain resolutions, create and update other development impact fee resolutions in accordance with the calculations and recommendations contained in the Nexus Report; and
In compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act, California Government Code section 66000 et seq., the City Council held a noticed public hearing on the proposed increase in development impact fees at its regular meeting on 2012, to solicit public input on the proposed increases to development impact fees,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows:
1. Findings pursuant to Government Code section 66001. The City Council finds and determines that the Nexus Report complies with California Government Code section 66001, and as to each of the proposed fees to be imposed on new development:
(a) Identifies the purpose of the fee;
(b) Identifies the use to which the fee will be put;
(c) Shows a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed;
(d) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the type of development projects on which the fee is imposed; and (e) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facilities or portion of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
2. Fees for Uses Consistent with the Nexus Report. The City Council hereby determines that the fees imposed, pursuant to this resolution shall be used solely to finance the public facilities and/or equipment and park land acquisition described or identified in the respective ordinances and Nexus Report.
3. Approval of Items in the Nexus Report. The City Council has considered the specific public facilities, equipment and park land acquisition cost estimates identified in the Nexus Report and each ordinance thereto and hereby approves such public facilities, equipment and park land acquisition cost and cost estimates and further finds that the cost estimates serve as a reasonable basis for calculating and imposing the development impact fees as set forth in the Nexus Report.
2 12-3209.006/79289
66 Resolution No. 2012-23
4. Consistency with General Plan. The City Council finds that the public facilities equipment and park land acquisition and fee methodology identified in the respective ordinances and Nexus Report are consistent with the City's General Plan and, in particular, those policies that require new development to mitigate its share of the impacts to City infrastructure and to be fiscally neutral.
5. Differentiation among Public Facilities. The City Council finds that the public facilities identified in the Nexus Report and funded through the collection of development impact fees recommended in the Nexus Report are separate and distinct from those public facilities funded through other fees presently imposed and collected by the City. To the extent that other fees imposed and collected by the City, including Specific Plan fees are used to fund the construction of the same public facilities identified in the respective ordinances and Nexus Report, then such other fees shall be a credit against the applicable development impact fees.
Notwithstanding the above provision, this resolution shall not be deemed to affect the imposition or collection of the water and sewer connection fees authorized by the Huntington Beach Municipal Code.
6. CEQA Finding. The adoption of the Nexus Report and the increase in development impact fees are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act in that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15378(b) (4), the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may cause a significant effect on the environment, is not defined as a "project" under CEQA.
7. Adoption of Report. The Nexus Report as amended April 27, 2012, including Appendices, is hereby adopted.
8. Fee Imposed. The new Development Impact Fees set by this resolution shall not apply to projects that have received discretionary project entitlement approval on or before June 5, 2012 and the following milestones are met:
1. Project applicant has submitted an approved application for building permits within 180 days after the fee going into effect or no later than February 18, 2013.
2. From the time of initial building permit application, the project makes continued progress toward satisfying plan check comments.
3. Building Permits are issued within 360 days after the fees go into effect.
An exception to the above milestones is the involvement of an outside third party regulatory agency. In such cases the 180 days to make building permit application will begin when the developer receives clearance from that agency. The City Manager shall have the authority, in his/her sole discretion, to extend milestone dates for qualifying "grandfathered" projects. All other projects are subject to the fees then in effect. All existing Development Impact Fees remain in effect until final action is taken on this resolution and respective ordinances. In the event any portion of this resolution is held invalid, the previously approved development impact fee shall automatically apply.
9. Timing of Fee. The development impact fees imposed by this resolution shall be paid pursuant to the ordinances or resolution creating each separate fee. Until final action is 3 12-3209.006/79289
67 Resolution No. 2012-23
taken by City Council adopting the ordinances or resolution referenced herein, resolutions 6164, 2006-23, 2000-97, 99-60, 2004-88 and 96-71 shall remain in effect.
10. Amount of Fee. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Development Impact Fees as set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein as well as Nexus Report Schedules 3.2, 4.3, 5.2, 6.2, 7.1, 8.1, and 8.4. Exhibit A and the Nexus Report sets forth the methodology and aggregate amount imposed as a development impact fee for both residential and nonresidential land uses and also sets forth the breakdown of each development impact fee by type of facility.
The amount of the development impact fees excluding traffic impact fees shall be automatically modified annually pursuant to the the percentage of increase or decrease in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) or any relevant successor for the Orange County area, from March to March of the preceding twelve (12) months.
Traffic impact fees shall be increased using the Engineering News Record's construction cost index as reported for the twelve month period ending in March of each year.
The escalator indices provided herein shall not take effect until March of 2016.
11. Use of fee. The development impact fees shall be solely used for the purposes described in the respective ordinances creating the fees and the Nexus Report.
Fees collected pursuant to existing ordinances and resolutions shall be maintained and used exclusively for those purposes and accounts for these fees shall remain in effect and shall be maintained by the City Manager or his/her designee. Fees collected under any of the categories listed in the Nexus Report may be used to finance the construction or implementation of any public facility listed in those categories to the extent that use of the fees may not exceed the percentage allocated to new development of all of the public facilities listed in the category, or sub-category.
12. Fee Determination by Type of Use.
A. Residential Development. Development impact fees for residential development shall be based upon the type of unit constructed. The development impact fee categories as shown in Exhibit A generally correspond to the City's land use designations in the land use element of the City's General Plan.
B. Nonresidential Land Uses. Development impact fees for nonresidential land uses shall be based upon the square footage of the building or other measurement detailed in the respective development impact fee ordinances. The development impact fee categories as shown in Exhibit A generally correspond to the City's land use designations in the land use element of the City's General Plan.
C. Uses Not Specified. In the event that there are land uses not specified in Exhibit A, the development impact fee for such use shall be determined by the City Manager or 4 12-3209.006/79289
68 Resolution No. 2012-23
his/her designee who shall determine such fee based on an analysis of the impacts of the proposed use on public facilities, equipment and/or park land.
13. Prior Resolutions Superseded. As provided herein the development impact fees approved and adopted by this resolution shall supersede and repeal any previously adopted development impact fee resolutions concerning the same, including 6164, 96-71, 99-60, 2000-97, 2004-88 and 2006-23, 2002-129, 2004-88.
14. Severability. If any action, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution, the Nexus Report, or other attachments thereto, shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution the Nexus Report, or other attachments thereto or fees levied by this resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provisions or application of fees. In the event any section of this resolution is held invalid the previously adopted affected fees shall be automatically reinstate as if never repealed or modified herein.
15. Effective Date. Consistent with California Government Code section 66017(a), the fees as identified in attached Exhibit "A" adopted by this resolution shall take effect sixty (60) days following final action taken on the respective ordinances or amendments thereto by the City Council.
16. Appeals. Appeals of any fees, including methodology, use, land valuation etc. created pursuant to this resolution shall be conducted as set forth in Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.73.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 20 .
Mayor
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Manager
1NITTirop„Ldr a gOVED:
j
4d 1.
100
111t
Deputy City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C---1- 6t y Attorne y
5 12-3209.006/79289
69 Resolution No. 2012-23
EXHIBIT A
70 Land Use
Resolution No. 2012-23
Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation
Development Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012)
Circulation
System
Law Fire (Streets,
Enforcement Suppression Signals, Public Library
Facilities* Facilities* Bridges)* Facilities
Park Land/
Open Space
& Facilities
(No Tract
Map)*
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit)
Resort Lodging Units (per Unit)
Commercial/Office Uses (per sq. ft.)
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq. ft.)
$277
$571
$258
$455
$532
$1.041
$0.443
$645
$267
$1,108
$356
$794
$0.329
$0.030
$1,737
$1,220
$909
$1,062
$1,538
$4.175
$1.789
$1,172
$908
$733
No Fee
No Fee
No Fee
No Fee
$12,500
$9,685
$7,818
$459
$359
$0.954
$0.772
*Represents 70% of recommended residential land use fee set forth in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, October 2011 (Amended April 27, 2012) Land Use
Development Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2013)
Circulation
System
Law Fire (Streets,
Enforcement Suppression Signals, Public Library
Facilities* Facilities* Bridges)* Facilities
Park Land/
Open Space
& Facilities
(No Tract
Map)*
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit)
Resort Lodging Units (per Unit)
Commercial/Office Uses (per sq. ft.)
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq. ft.)
$317
$652
$295
$455
$532
$1.041
$0.443
$738
$306
$1,266
$356
$794
$0.329
$0.030
$1,986
$1,395
$1,039
$1,062
$1,538
$4.175
$1.789
$1,172
$908
$733
No Fee
No Fee
No Fee
No Fee
$14,286
$11,068
$8,935
$459
$359
$0.954
$0.772
*Represents 80% of recommended residential land use fee set forth in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, October 2011 (Amended April 27, 2012) June 4 Consultant-Staff Recom Fee
Date Printed: 5/24/2012
71 Land Use
Resolution No. 2012-23
Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation
Development Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2014)
Circulation
System
Law Fire (Streets,
Enforcement Suppression Signals, Public Library
Facilities* Facilities* Bridges)* Facilities
Park Land/
Open Space
& Facilities
(No Tract
Map)*
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit)
Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit)
Resort Lodging Units (per Unit)
Commercial/Office Uses (per sq. ft.)
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq. ft.)
$356
$734
$332
$455
$532
$1.041
$0.443
$830
$344
$1,425
$356
$794
$0.329
$0.030
$2,226
$1,563
$1,165
$1,062
$1,538
$4.175
$1.789
$1,172
$908
$733
No Fee
No Fee
No Fee
No Fee
$16,071
$12,452
$10,052
$459
$359
$0.954
$0.772
*Represents 90% of recommended residential land use fee set forth in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, October 2011 (Amended April 27, 2012) June 4 Consultant-Staff Recom Fee
Date Printed: 5/24/2012
72 Resolution No. 2012-23
Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012) Land Use
Adjusted
Trip Ends
Average
Distance
Trip-end to
Trip
Additional
Trip Miles
Cost per
Trip Mile
Cost per 1000 sq. ft,
dwelling unit or other unit
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit)
Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 50.22 $ 1,737.61 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 50.22 $ 1,220.35 /Unit Condominium/Townhou
se 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 50.22 $ 1,064.66 /Unit
Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 50.22 $ 908.98 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door)
Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room
All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room
iNpusTRIAL41 per tow SF)
General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf commp3ppw(por, 1;001§E)
Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber
Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical-Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High-Turnover
Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER(as noted)
Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre
Service Station/Market
(avg) 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position
Service Station w/Car
Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel
Position
73 6.151 7.91 0.51 24.31 $ 57.39 1 $
5.361 7.91 0.51 21.21 $ 57.39 1 $
4.571 7.9 0.51 18.11$ 57.39 1$ 1,038.76 1/Unit
Apartment
Condominium/
Townhouse
Mobile Home Dwelling
1,394.58 /Unit
1,216.67 /Unit
0.5 4.3 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf
0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf
/Fuel
Position 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02
23.45 2.47
5.92 22.21
7.16 8.8
30.2 4.3
11.42 4.3
62.93 8.9 4.3
43.57 4.3
13.97 4.3
3.07 4.3
107.69 4.3
99.35 4.3
4.3 Office Park
Research Park
Business Park
Bldg. Materials/Lumber
Store
Garden Center
Movie Theater
Church
Medical-Dental Office
General Office Building
Shopping Center
Hospital
Discount Center
High-Turnover
Restaurant
Convenience Market
Office Park
OTHER (as noted)
Cemetery
Service Station/Market
(avg)
Service Station w/Car
Wash
7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $
5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $
9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $
29.351 4.31 0.51 63.11$ 64.34 1$
4.3 $ 64.34 341.00 /1,000 sf 0.5 5.3
4.3 12.7 $ 64.34 817.12 /1,000 sf 0.5
97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf 8.8 0.5
2,097.48 /1,000 sf
1,415.48 /1,000 sf
2,644.37 /1,000 sf
4,059 85 /1,000 sf
64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf
24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf
0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf
0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf
0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf
0.5 0.5
30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf
6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 1/Acre
/Fuel 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 1Position
0.5 0.5
0.5 Resolution No. 2012-23
Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2013) Adjusted Average Trip-end to Additional Cost per Cost per 1000 sq. ft, Land Use Trip Ends Distance Trip Trip Miles Trip Mile dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit)
Detached Dwelling Unit
8.761 7.91 0.51 34.61 $ 57.39 1 $ 1,985.69 1/Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door
Hotel
6.29 3.77
4.34 7.6
7.6 7.6
0.5 0.5
0.5 23.9
14.3 16.5
$ 64.34
$ 64.34
$ 64.34
$ 1,537.73 /Room
920.06 /Room
$ 1,061.61 /Room
All Suites Hotel
Motel
INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF)
General Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Manufacturing
Warehousing
COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF)
6.17 9.0
5.97 9.0
2.73 9.0
4.39 9.0
27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf
26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf
12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf
19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf
0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5
74 Resolution No. 2012-23
Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2014) Land Use
Adjusted
Trip Ends
Average
Distance
Trip-end to
Trip
Additional
Trip Miles
Cost per
Trip Mile
Cost per 1000 sq. ft,
dwelling unit or other unit
RESIDENTIAL LAND::LISES:(Per'Unit):.
Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,226.16 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 64.34 $ 1,563.46 /Unit Condominium/
Townhouse 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 64.34 $ 1,364.01 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,164.55 /Unit Rp :O.RT/TRVI:31.ST (per unit or gotit Door)
Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room
All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room
INpusTRim, (:pek1j0:00 SP):,
General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 $F):::
Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber
Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical-Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High-Turnover
Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER (as noted.:
Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre
Service Station/Market
Sag ) 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Poon
Service Station w/Car
Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel
Position
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fee SclifedtAntsi89.S° 12-23
Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012) Land Use
Adjusted
Trip Ends
Average
Distance
Trip-end
to Trip
,
Additional
Trip Miles
Cost per
Trip Mile
Recommended Cost per
1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit
or other unit (90% of
original)
30% Increase
Scenario Cost per
1000 sq. ft, dwelling
unit or other unit
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit)
Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 50.22 1,737.61 /Unit 1,722.55 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 50.22 $ 1,220.35 /Unit $ 1,209.50 /Unit Condominium/Townhouse 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 50.22 $ 1,064.66 /Unit 1,054.55 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 50.22 $ 908.98 /Unit 899.59 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door
Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room $ 1,218.63 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room 729.93 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room $ 841.02 /Room INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF)
General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf $ 1,279.46 /1 ,000 Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf $ 1,238.01 c/f1,000 Manufacturing 2.'73 9.0 0.5 '12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf 566.11 ,
/1,000
cf
Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf 910.74 /1,000 cf
COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF)
Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,522.61 000 /1, sf
Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,027.85 /1,000 sf
Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf $ 1,917.85 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber
Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf
Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf
Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 11,000 sf $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical-Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ 4.559.89 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf $ 1,470.08 /10 00 ' sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf
Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High-Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 11,000 sf $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf
Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER (as noted)
Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market
(avg) 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position $ 14,894.71 /Fuel
Position
Service Station w/Car
Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel
Position $ 13,743.02 /Fuel
Position
88 89
90 ATTACHMENT #2
91 ORDINANCE NO. 3942
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 17.75 RELATING TO
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR POLICE FACILITIES
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to add Chapter 17.73, said chapter to read as follows:
Chapter 17.75
POLICE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Sections
17.75.010 Legislative findings.
17.75.020 Intent and Purpose.
17.75.030 Definitions.
17.75.040 Police Facilities Development Impact Fee.
17.75.050 Fund Established.
17.75.060 Fee imposed.
17.75.070 Calculation of Police Facilities Development Impact Fee.
17.75.075 Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects
17.75.076 Fee Adjustments.
17.75.080 Payment of fee.
17.75.090 Use of funds.
17.75.100 Refund.
17.75.110 Exemptions and credits.
17.75.120 Appeals.
17.75.130 Credit for Construction of Non-Site Related Improvements.
17.75.140 Eligible Expenditures from Fee Reserve Account
17.75.150 Annual report and amendment procedures.
17.75.160 Effect of Police Facilities Development Impact Fee on zoning and subdivision regulations.
17.75.170 Violation—Penalty.
17.75.180 Severability.
12-3209.001/78649
92 Ordinance No. 3942
17.75.010 - Legislative findings.
A. The State of California, through the enactment of Government Code Sections 66001 through 66009 has authorized the City to enact Development Impact Fees.
B. The imposition of Development Impact Fees is a method of ensuring that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of capital facilities and other costs necessary to accommodate such development. These fees are established to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare.
C. Increase in residential and nonresidential development in the City creates a need for increased funds to pay for the cost of increased police services and facilities which are needed to serve the increasing development in the City.
D. Pursuant to the "Development Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach" ("Nexus Report") dated October, 2011, as amended April 27, 2012, which incorporated herein by reference in these findings as though set forth in full, the fees established pursuant to this Chapter are derived from, based upon, and do not exceed the costs of providing additional police services attributable to applicable new residential or nonresidential development. This study is based in part upon master planning to more specifically identify capital facilities to serve new development; the acquisition of additional property for police facilities; the construction of buildings for police services; the furnishing of buildings or facilities for police services; and the purchasing of equipment and vehicles for police services.
E. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be used to finance the police facilities and equipment identified in herein in furtherance of the City's General Plan, as well as the Nexus Report and its attached Master Facilities Plan and the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan.
F. Detailed study of the impacts of future residential and nonresidential construction in the City, along with an analysis of the need for new police facilities and equipment has been prepared. This study is included in the Nexus Report.
G. As set forth in the Nexus Report, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the police facilities and equipment set forth in this Chapter and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged. In addition, there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development to which the fee is charged and a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facilities and equipment or portion thereof attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. 2 12-3209.001/78649
93 Ordinance No. 3942
17.75.020 — Intent and Purpose.
A Police Facilities Development Impact Fee is being created for the purpose of assuring that the impacts created by new development in the City of Huntington Beach pay a fair share of the proportional facility and equipment and vehicle costs required to support needed police facilities and related costs necessary to accommodate such development.
This Chapter is intended to implement the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, as well as following the recommendations in the Nexus Report including the Master Facilities Plan, and the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan by ensuring that the City's police services are maintained when new development is constructed within the City limits. By imposing a fee that is reasonably related to the burdens created by new development on the City's Police Department, together with funding available from other City revenue sources, the City will be able to construct the required capital improvements, accommodate projected growth and fulfill the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan and Master Facilities Plan, a part of the Nexus Report.
It is the intent of the City Council that the fee required by this Chapter shall be supplementary to any conditions imposed upon a development project pursuant to other provisions of the Municipal Code, the Subdivision Map Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, other state and local laws, ordinances or chapter provisions which may authorize the imposition of conditions on development.
17.75.030 - Definitions. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.75.040 - Police Facilities Development Impact Fee. There is imposed a Police Facilities Development Impact Fee on all new non-subdivided Residential and Nonresidential development.
17.75.050 - Fund established. A Police Facilities Development Impact Fee fund is established. The Police Facilities Development Impact Fee fund is a fund to be utilized for payment of the actual or estimated costs of police facilities and equipment as set forth in the Nexus Report which includes the Master Facilities Plan, as well as the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan related to new residential and nonresidential construction.
17.75.060 - Fee imposed.
A. Any person who, 60 days after the effective date of this Development Impact Fee Ordinance, seeks to engage in non-subdivided Residential or Nonresidential development including mobilehome development by obtaining a building permit or other discretionary approval is required to pay a Police Facilities Development Impact Fee in the manner and amount as set forth in the current City of Huntington Beach Fee Resolution separately adopted.
3 12-3209.001/78649
94 Ordinance No. 3942
B. No certificate of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, or final building permit approval or construction approval for a mobilehome pad or pads, as applicable, for the activities listed in this Chapter, shall be issued unless and until the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee required by this Chapter has been paid to the City.
17.75.070 - Calculation of Police Facilities Development Impact Fee.
A. At the time of the issuance of the building permit, the Director of Planning and Building or his/her designee ("Director") shall calculate the amount of the applicable Police Facilities Development Impact Fee due as specified in the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee.
B. The Director of Planning and Building shall calculate the amount of the applicable Police Facilities Development Impact Fee due by:
1. Determining the number and type of dwelling units in a residential development or mobilehome pads in a mobilehome park or site, and multiplying the same by the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee amount per dwelling unit or pad as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
2. Determining the gross square feet of floor area, or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a nonresidential development, and multiplying the same by the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
3. Determining the number and type of dwelling units and the nonresidential number of lodging units or gross square feet of floor area, type of use and location, in a structure containing mixed uses which include a residential use, and multiplying the same by the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee amount for each use as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
4. Determining the gross square feet of floor area, or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a structure containing mixed uses which include two (2) or more nonresidential principal uses, and multiplying the same by the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution. The gross square feet of floor area of any accessory use will be charged at the same rate as the predominant principal use unless the Department of Planning and Building finds that the accessory use is related to another principal use.
17.75.075 Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects. If a Development Project will be constructed in phases, and separate building permits and certificates of occupancy will be issued for each phase, fees imposed pursuant to this Chapter shall be calculated on the basis of the development characteristics of the entire Development Project. Payment of 4 12-3209.001/78649
95 Ordinance No. 3942
the fees may be made separately for each phase, provided the amount paid for each phase shall be equal to the percentage that that phase represents of the total development project's development characteristics. The fee shall be the fee in effect at the time payment is due.
17.75.076 Fee Adjustments. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.75.080 - Payment of fee.
A. The City shall collect from the applicant the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, final building permit approval or construction approval for mobilehome pad or pads, whichever occurs first.
B. Except for any administrative charge allocated to the City, all funds collected shall be properly identified and promptly transferred for deposit in the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee fund and used solely for the purposes specified in this Chapter.
17.75.090 - Use of funds.
A. Funds collected from the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be used to fund the costs of providing additional police services attributable to new residential and nonresidential construction and shall include:
1. The acquisition of additional property for law enforcement facilities;
2. The construction of new facilities for law enforcement services;
3. The furnishing of new buildings or facilities for law enforcement services;
4. The purchase of new specialty equipment and vehicles for law enforcement services;
5. The funding of a master plan to identify capital facilities to serve new police department development;
6. The cost of financing (e.g., interest payments).
7. Projects identified in the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan, adopted annual City of Huntington Beach budget or City Council approved development projects.
B. Funds shall not be used for periodic or routine maintenance or to maintain or repair existing buildings, and/or existing vehicles or equipment. 5 12-3209.001/78649
96 Ordinance No. 3942
C. Revenue raised would be limited to capitalized cost related to growth.
D. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are issued for advanced provision of capital facilities for which Police Facilities Development Impact Fees may be expended, Development Impact Fees may be used to pay debt service on such bonds or similar debt instruments to the extent that the facilities provided are of the type described in this Chapter.
E. Funds may be used to provide refunds as described in this Chapter.
17.75.100 - Refund.
A. Any applicant who has paid a Police Facilities Development Impact Fee pursuant to this Chapter may apply for a full or partial refund of same, if, within one (1) year after collection of the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee the fee has been modified as follows: reduction in the number of dwelling units, a change in the type of dwelling units, a reduction in square footage, or the applicability of an exemption pursuant to this Chapter. In the event a refund is issued, the City may retain a sum up to twenty (20%) percent of the Development Impact Fee paid by the applicant to offset the administrative costs of refund. In no event shall a refund exceed the amount of the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee actually paid.
B. Erroneous or Illegal Collection. Fees will be refunded if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Director that they were erroneously or illegally collected.
If the Director determines the fees were not erroneously or illegally collected, then the applicant may appeal the decision pursuant to Chapter 17.73 Appeals. An application for a refund pursuant to this Section must be filed within ninety (90) days after the payment of the fees.
C. City Failure to Commit Funds. Pursuant to the Mitigated Fee Act, upon application of the then current landowner, fees will be refunded if the City fails to commit them to a project of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report within five years from the date that the fees were collected from the applicant. For purposes of this subsection, fees are deemed to have been "committed" if they have been budgeted or otherwise encumbered by the City for an eligible improvement, studies, design drawings or any necessary applications for approval by other governmental agencies have been initiated, construction bidding has been initiated, or improvements are under construction. Eligible refunds, plus interest at the City's average annual cost of funds will be made only upon an application filed within 180 days of the expiration of the fifth anniversary of the fee payment.
17.74.110 Exemptions and credits.
A. Exemptions. Any claim of exemption must be made no later than the time of application for a building permit or mobilehome construction approval. Any claim of exemption must be filed in the same manner and will be considered pursuant to 6 12-3209.001/78649
97 Ordinance No. 3942
the same procedure as for a fee adjustment as provided in Chapter 17.73. The following shall be exempted from payment of the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee:
1. Residential Development
a. Alteration or expansion of an existing residential building in which no additional dwelling units are created, the use is not changed and where no additional police services will be provided over and above those provided by the existing building;
b. The replacement of a destroyed or partially destroyed building or structure with a new building or structure of the same size and use, provided that no additional police services will be required over and above those provided by the original use of the land;
c. The construction of residential accessory buildings, structures or uses which will not require additional police services over and above those provided by the principal building or use of the land; d. The installation of a replacement mobilehome on a lot or other such site when a Police Facilities Development Impact Fee for such mobilehome site has previously been paid pursuant to this Chapter, or where a mobilehome legally existed on such site on or prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Chapter; e. Construction, replacement or rebuilding of a single-family dwelling (one (1) unit per lot) on an existing lot of record, or the replacement of one (1) mobilehome with another on the same pad, or the moving and relocation of a single-family home from one (1) lot within the City to another lot within the City. This exemption shall not apply to tract development, to the development of more than one (1) unit per lot, nor to the replacement of a single-family dwelling with more than one (1) dwelling unit;
2. Affordable housing for lower income households. Property rented, leased, sold, conveyed or otherwise transferred, at a rental price or purchase price which does not exceed the "affordable housing cost," as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code when provided to a "lower income household" as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code or "very low-income household" as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code. This exemption shall require the applicant to execute an agreement to guarantee that the units shall be maintained for lower and very low-income households whether as units for rent or for sale or transfer. The agreement shall be in 7 12-3209.001/78649
98 Ordinance No. 3942
the form of a deed restriction or other legally binding and enforceable document acceptable to the City Attorney and shall bind the owner and any successor-in-interest to the real property being developed. The agreement shall subordinate, if required, to any state or federal program providing affordable housing to lower and very low-income households. The agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Applicant or any successor-in- interest shall be required to provide annually, or as requested, the names of all tenants or purchasers, current rents and income certification to insure compliance. Voluntary removal of the housing restriction or violation of the restriction shall require the applicant or any successor-in-interest to pay the then applicable Police Facilities Development Impact Fee at the time of voluntary conversion or as imposed at the time of violation on the unit in violation, plus any attorneys' fees and costs of enforcement, if applicable; B. Credits. Any applicant whose development is located within a community facilities district (CFD) or, and is subject to the assessments thereof, shall receive an offset credit towards the fees established by this Chapter to the extent that the assessments fund improvements within the CFD which would otherwise be funded by the Development Impact Fees established by this Chapter.
17.75.120 Appeals. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.74.130 Credit for Construction of Non-Site-Related Improvements. Applications for credit for construction of non-site-related improvements shall submit applicable engineering drawings, specifications and construction cost estimates or the like to the Director. The Director shall determine any credit for improvement based on either these cost estimates or alternative estimates if the Director determines reasonably that the estimates submitted by the applicant are either unreliable or inaccurate. In no event shall the amount of the credit exceed the improvement cost specified in the Nexus Report, or other applicable basis for the fee, nor shall the credit exceed the amount that would otherwise apply.
No final inspection or certificate of occupancy for the Development Project may be issued until: (1) the construction is completed and accepted by the City; (2) a suitable maintenance and warranty bond is received and accepted by the City; and (3) all design, construction, inspection, testing, bonding and acceptance procedures are in strict compliance with City paving, drainage and other applicable requirements
17.75.140 Eligible Expenditures From Fee Reserve Account. All monies and interest earnings in any Reserve Account shall be expended on the projects of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report, or such other report as may be prepared from time to time 8 12-3209.001/78649
99 Ordinance No. 3942
to document the reasonable fair share of the costs to mitigate the police services impacts of new development.
17.75.150 - Annual report and amendment procedures.
A. Within one hundred eighty (180) days after the last day of each fiscal year, the Police Chief of the City of Huntington Beach shall evaluate progress in implementation of the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee program and shall prepare a report thereon to the City Council in accordance with Government Code Section 66006, incorporating among other things:
1. The police facilities and equipment commenced, purchased or completed utilizing monies from this Police Facilities Development Impact Fee fund;
2. The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned;
3. The amount of Police Facilities Development Impact Fees in the fund; and
4. Recommended changes to the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee, including, but not necessarily limited to changes in this Police Facilities Development Impact Fee chapter or the fee resolution.
B. Based upon the report and such other factors as the City Council deems relevant and applicable, the City Council may amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution implementing this Chapter. Changes to the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee rates or schedules may be made by amending the fee resolution. Any change which increases the amount of the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be adopted by the City Council only after a noticed public hearing. Nothing herein precludes the City Council or limits its discretion to amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution establishing Police Facilities Development Impact Fee rates or schedules at such other times as may be deemed necessary.
17.75.160 - Effect of Police Facilities Development Impact Fee on zoning and subdivision regulations. This Chapter shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density/intensity of development, design and improvement standards and public improvement requirements or any other aspect of the development of land or construction of buildings, which may be imposed by the City pursuant to the City's zoning regulations, subdivision regulations or other ordinances or regulations of the City, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation with respect to all residential and nonresidential development.
17.75.170 - Violation—Penalty. A violation of this Chapter shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors are prosecuted; and upon conviction, the violator shall be punishable according to law. However, in addition to or in lieu of any criminal 9 12-3209.001/78649
100
Chief of Police
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ordinance No. 3942
prosecution, the City shall have the power to sue in civil court to enforce the provisions of this Chapter.
17.75.180 - Severabilitv. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision; and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of July , 20 12 10 12-3209.001/78649
101
ATTACHMENT #3
102
ORDINANCE NO. 3943
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 17.74 RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEES FOR FIRE FACILITIES
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 17.74, said chapter to read as follows:
Chanter 17.74
FIRE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Sections
17.74.010 Legislative findings.
17.74.020 Intent and Purpose.
17.74.030 Definitions
17.74.040 Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee.
17.74.050 Fund Established.
17.74.060 Fee imposed.
17.74.070 Calculation of Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee.
17.74.075 Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects
17.74.076 Fee Adjustments
17.74.080 Payment of fee.
17.74.090 Use of funds.
17.74.100 Refund.
17.74.110 Exemptions and credits.
17.74.120 Appeals
17.74.130 Credit for Construction of Non-Site Related Improvements.
17.74.140 Eligible Expenditures from Fee Reserve Account
17.74.150 Annual report and amendment procedures.
17.74.160 Effect of Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee on zoning and subdivision regulations.
17.74.170 Violation—Penalty.
17.74.180 Severability.
1 12-3209.001/78650
103
Ordinance No. 3943
17.74.010 - Legislative findings.
A. The State of California, through the enactment of Government Code Sections 66001 through 66009 has authorized the City to enact Development Impact Fees.
B. The imposition of Development Impact Fees is a method of ensuring that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of capital facilities and other costs necessary to accommodate such development. These fees are established to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare.
C. Increase in residential and nonresidential development in the City creates a need for increased funds to pay for the cost of increased fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment which are needed to serve the increasing development in the City.
D. Pursuant to the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach" ("Nexus Report") dated October, 2011, as amended April 27, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in these findings as though set forth in full, the fees established pursuant to this Chapter are derived from, based upon, and do not exceed the costs of providing additional fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment attributable to applicable new residential or nonresidential development. This study is based in part upon master planning to more specifically identify capital facilities to serve new development; the acquisition, relocation and expansion of fire stations; the construction or acquisition of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment, and increase the number of emergency response vehicles.
E. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be used to finance the acquisition, relocation and expansion of fire stations; the construction or acquisition of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment, and increase the number of emergency response vehicles identified herein in furtherance of the City General Plan, the Nexus Report and its attached Master Facilities Plan, and the City of Huntington Beach Master Improvement Plan.
F. A detailed study of the impacts of future residential and nonresidential construction in the City, along with an analysis of the need for the acquisition, relocation and expansion of fire stations; the construction or acquisition of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment, and increase the number of emergency response vehicles has been prepared. This study is included in the Nexus Report.
G. As set forth in the Nexus Report, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the acquisition, relocation and expansion of fire stations; the construction or acquisition of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment, and increase the number of emergency response vehicles set forth in this Chapter and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged. In addition, there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development to which the fee is charged and a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of 2 12-3209.001/78650
104
Ordinance No. 3943
the facilities and equipment or portion thereof attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
17.74.020 — Intent and Purpose.
A Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee is being created for the purpose of assuring that the impacts created by new development in the City of Huntington Beach pay a fair share of the proportional facility and equipment and vehicle costs required to support needed acquisition, relocation and expansion of fire stations; the construction or acquisition of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment, and increase the number of emergency response vehicles and related costs necessary to accommodate such development.
This Chapter is intended to implement goals, objectives and policies of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, as well as following the recommendations in the Nexus Report including the Master Facilities Plan, which is a part of the Nexus Report, and the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan by ensuring that the City's acquisition, relocation and expansion of fire stations; the construction or acquisition of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment, and the increase in the number of emergency response vehicles are maintained when new development is constructed within the City limits. By imposing a fee that is reasonably related to the burdens created by new development on the City's Fire Department, together with funding available from other City revenue sources, the City will be able to construct the required capital improvements, accommodate projected growth and fulfill the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan, the Nexus Report and its attached Master Facilities Plan.
It is the intent of the City Council that the fee required by this Chapter shall be supplementary to any conditions imposed upon a development project pursuant to other provisions of the Municipal Code, the Subdivision Map Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, other state and local laws, ordinances or chapter provisions which may authorize the imposition of conditions on development.
17.74.030 - Definitions. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.74.040 - Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee. There is imposed a Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee on all non-subdivided, new Residential and Nonresidential development.
17.74.050 - Fund established. A Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee fund is established.
The Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee fund is a fund to be utilized for payment of the actual or estimated costs of Fire facilities and equipment as set forth the Nexus Report which includes the Master Facilities Plan, as well as the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan related to new Residential and Nonresidential construction 3 12-3209.001178650
105
Ordinance No. 3943
17.74.060 - Fee imposed.
A. Any person who, 60 days after the effective date of this Development Impact Fee, seeks to engage in non-subdivided Residential or Nonresidential development including mobilehome development by obtaining a building permit or other discretionary approval is required to pay a Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee in the manner and amount as set forth in the current City of Huntington Beach Fee Resolution separately adopted.
B. No certificate of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, or final building permit approval or construction approval for a mobilehome pad or pads, as applicable, for the activities listed in this Chapter, shall be issued unless and until the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee required by this Chapter has been paid to the City.
17.74.070 - Calculation of Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee.
A. At the time of the issuance of the building peimit, the Director of Planning and Building or his/her designee ("Director") shall calculate the amount of the applicable Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee due as specified in the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee.
B. The Director shall calculate the amount of the applicable Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee due by:
1. Determining the number and type of dwelling units in a residential development or mobilehome pads in a mobilehome park or site, and multiplying the same by the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee amount per dwelling unit or pad as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
2. Determining the gross square feet of floor area, or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a nonresidential development, and multiplying the same by the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
3. Determining the number and type of dwelling units and the nonresidential number of lodging units or gross square feet of floor area, type of use and location, in a structure containing mixed uses which include a residential use, and multiplying the same by the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee amount for each use as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
4. Determining the gross square feet of floor area, or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a structure containing mixed uses which include two (2) or more nonresidential principal uses, and multiplying the same by the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution. The gross square feet of floor area of any accessory use will be charged at the same rate as the predominant principal use unless the Director finds that the accessory use is related to another principal use.
4 12-3209.001/78650
106
Ordinance No. 3943
17.74.075 Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects. If a Development Project will be constructed in phases, and separate building permits and certificates of occupancy will be issued for each phase, fees imposed pursuant to this Chapter shall be calculated on the basis of the development characteristics of the entire Development Project. Payment of the fees may be made separately for each phase, provided the amount paid for each phase shall be equal to the percentage that that phase represents of the total development project's development characteristics. The fee shall be the fee in effect at the time payment is due.
17.74.076 Fee Adjustments. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.74.080 Payment of fee.
A. The City shall collect from the applicant the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, or final building permit approval or construction approval for mobilehome pad or pads, whichever occurs first.
B. Except for any administrative allocated to the City, all funds collected shall be properly identified and promptly transferred for deposit in the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee fund and used solely for the purposes specified in this Chapter.
17.74.090 Use of funds.
A. Funds collected from the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be used to fund the costs of providing additional Fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment attributable to new residential and nonresidential construction and shall include:
1. The acquisition of additional property for fire department facilities;
2. The construction of new facilities for fire department services;
3. The furnishing of new buildings or facilities for fire department services;
4. The purchase of new specialty equipment and vehicles for fire department services;
5. The funding of a master plan to identify capital facilities to serve new Fire Department development;
6. The cost of financing (e.g., interest payments).
7. Projects identified in the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan, adopted annual City of Huntington Beach budget, or City Council approved development projects.
5 12-3209.001/78650
107
Ordinance No. 3943
B. Funds shall not be used for periodic or routine maintenance or to maintain or repair existing buildings, and/or existing vehicles or equipment.
C. Revenue raised would be limited to capitalized cost related to growth.
D. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are issued for advanced provision of capital facilities for which Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees may be expended, Development Impact Fees may be used to pay debt service on such bonds or similar debt instruments to the extent that the facilities provided are of the type described in this Chapter.
E. Funds may be used to provide refunds as described in this Chapter.
17.74.100 Refund.
A. Any applicant who has paid a Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee pursuant to this Chapter may apply to the Director for a full or partial refund of same, if, within one (1) year after collection of the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee the fee has been modified as follows: reduction in the number of dwelling units, a change in the type of dwelling units, a reduction in square footage, or the applicability of an exemption pursuant to this Chapter. In the event a refund is issued, the City may retain a sum up to twenty (20%) percent of the Development Impact Fee paid by the applicant to offset the administrative costs of refund. In no event shall a refund exceed the amount of the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee actually paid.
B. Erroneous or Illegal Collection. Fees will be refunded if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Director that they were erroneously or illegally collected. If the Director determines the fees were not erroneously or illegally collected, then the applicant may appeal the decision pursuant to Chapter 17.73 Appeals. An application for a refund pursuant to this Section must be filed within ninety (90) days after the payment of the fees.
C. City Failure to Commit Funds. Pursuant to the Mitigated Fee Act, upon application of the then current landowner, fees will be refunded if the City fails to commit them to a project of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report within five years from the date that the fees were collected from the applicant. For purposes of this subsection, fees are deemed to have been "committed" if they have been budgeted or otherwise encumbered by the City for an eligible improvement, studies, design drawings or any necessary applications for approval by other governmental agencies have been initiated, construction bidding has been initiated, or improvements are under construction. Eligible refunds, plus interest at the City's average annual cost of funds, will be made only upon an application filed within 180 days of the expiration of the fifth anniversary of the fee payment.
6 12-3209.001/78650
108
Ordinance No. 3943
17.74.110 Exemptions and credits.
A. Exemptions. Any claim of exemption must be made no later than the time of application for a building permit or mobilehome construction approval. Any claim of exemption must be filed in the same manner and will be considered pursuant to the same procedure as for a fee adjustment as provided in this Chapter 17.73. The following shall be exempted from payment of the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee:
1. Residential Development
a. Alteration or expansion of an existing residential building in which no additional dwelling units are created, the use is not changed and where no additional Fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment will be provided over and above those provided by the existing building;
b. The replacement of a destroyed or partially destroyed building or structure with a new building or structure of the same size and use, provided that no additional Fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment will be required over and above those provided by the original use of the land;
c. The construction of residential accessory buildings, structures or uses which will not require additional Fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment over and above those provided by the principal building or use of the land;
d. The installation of a replacement mobilehome on a lot or other such site when a Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee for such mobilehome site has previously been paid pursuant to this Chapter, or where a mobilehome legally existed on such site on or prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Chapter;
e. Construction, replacement or rebuilding of a single-family dwelling (one (1) unit per lot) on an existing lot of record, or the replacement of one (1) mobilehome with another on the same pad, or the moving and relocation of a single-family home from one (1) lot within the City to another lot within the City. This exemption shall not apply to tract development, to the development of more than one (1) unit per lot, nor to the replacement of a single-family dwelling with more than one (1) dwelling unit;
2. Affordable housing for lower income households. Property rented, leased, sold, conveyed or otherwise transferred, at a rental price or purchase price which does not exceed the "affordable housing cost," as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code when provided to a "lower income household" as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code or "very 7 12-3209.001/78650
109
Ordinance No. 3943
low-income household" as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code. This exemption shall require the applicant to execute an agreement to guarantee that the units shall be maintained for lower and very low-income households whether as units for rent or for sale or transfer. The agreement shall be in the form of a deed restriction or other legally binding and enforceable document acceptable to the City Attorney and shall bind the owner and any successor-in-interest to the real property being developed. The agreement shall subordinate, if required, to any state or federal program providing affordable housing to lower and very low-income households. The agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Applicant or any successor-in-interest shall be required to provide annually, or as requested, the names of all tenants or purchasers, current rents and income certification to insure compliance. Voluntary removal of the housing restriction or violation of the restriction shall require the applicant or any successor-in-interest to pay the then applicable Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee at the time of voluntary conversion or as imposed at the time of violation on the unit in violation, plus any attorneys' fees and costs of enforcement, if applicable;
B. Credits. Any applicant whose development is located within a community facilities district (CFD) or, and is subject to the assessments thereof, shall receive an offset credit towards the fees established by this Chapter to the extent that the assessments fund improvements within the CFD which would otherwise be funded by the Development Impact Fees established by this Chapter.
17.74.120 Appeals. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.74.130 Credit for Construction of Non-Site-Related Improvements. Applications for credit for construction of non-fire-related improvements shall submit applicable engineering drawings, specifications and construction cost estimates or the like to the Director. The Director shall determine any credit for improvement based on either these cost estimates or alternative estimates if the Director determines reasonably that the estimates submitted by the applicant are either unreliable or inaccurate. In no event shall the amount of the credit exceed the improvement cost specified in the Nexus Report, or other applicable basis for the fee, nor shall the credit exceed the amount that would otherwise apply.
No final inspection or certificate of occupancy for the Development Project may be issued until:
(1) the construction is completed and accepted by the City; (2) a suitable maintenance and warranty bond is received and accepted by the City; and (3) all design, construction, inspection, testing, bonding and acceptance procedures are in strict compliance with City paving, drainage and other applicable requirements
17.74.140 Eligible Expenditures From Fee Reserve Account. All monies and interest earnings in any Reserve Account shall be expended on projects of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report, or such other report as may be prepared from time to time to document the 8 12-3209.001/78650
110
Ordinance No. 3943
reasonable fair share of the costs to mitigate the fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment impacts of new development.
17.74.150 Annual report and amendment procedures.
A. Within one hundred eighty (180) days after the last day of each fiscal year, the Fire Chief of the City of Huntington Beach shall evaluate progress in implementation of the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee and shall prepare a report thereon to the City Council in accordance with Government Code Section 66006, incorporating among other things:
1. The Fire facilities and equipment commenced, purchased or completed utilizing monies from the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee fund;
2. The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned;
3. The amount of Fire Facilities Development Impact Fees in the fund; and
4. Recommended changes to the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee, including, but not necessarily limited to changes in this Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee chapter or the fee resolution.
B. Based upon the report and such other factors as the City Council deems relevant and applicable, the City Council may amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution implementing this Chapter. Changes to the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee rates or schedules may be made by amending the fee resolution. Any change which increases the amount of the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be adopted by the City Council only after a noticed public hearing. Nothing herein precludes the City Council or limits its discretion to amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution establishing Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee rates or schedules at such other times as may be deemed necessary.
17.74.160 Effect of Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee on zoning and subdivision regulations. This Chapter shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density/intensity of development, design and improvement standards and public improvement requirements or any other aspect of the development of land or construction of buildings, which may be imposed by the City pursuant to the City's zoning regulations, subdivision regulations or other ordinances or regulations of the City, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation with respect to all residential and nonresidential development.
17.74.170 Violation—Penalty. A violation of this Chapter shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors are prosecuted; and upon conviction, the violator shall be punishable according to law. However, in addition to or in lieu of any criminal prosecution, the City shall have the power to sue in civil court to enforce the provisions of this Chapter.
17.74.180 Severability. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall 9 12-3209.001/78650
111
ATTEST:
City Clerk
?,PROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Ordinance No. 3943
be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision; and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 20 .
Mayor
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Manager
10 12-3209.001/78650
112
ATTACHMENT #4
113
ORDINANCE NO. 3944
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING CHAPTER 17.65 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 17.65.015 is hereby added to Chapter 17.65, said section to read as follows:
17.65.015 - Legislative findings.
A. The State of California, through the enactment of Government Code Sections 66001 through 66009 has authorized the City to enact development impact fees.
B. The imposition of development impact fees is a method of ensuring that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of capital facilities and other costs necessary to accommodate such development. These fees are established to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare.
C. Increase in residential and nonresidential development in the City creates a need for increased funds to pay for the cost of street, traffic signal and bridge improvements which are needed to serve the increasing development in the City.
D. Pursuant to the "Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach" ("Nexus Report") dated October, 2011, as amended April 27, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in these findings as though set forth in full, the fees established pursuant to this Chapter are derived from, based upon, and do not exceed the costs of providing additional street, traffic signal and bridge improvements attributable to applicable new residential or nonresidential development. This study is based in part upon master planning to more specifically identify existing circulation system elements.
E. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be used to finance the possible acquisition and expansion of circulation systems identified herein in furtherance of the City's General Plan, as well as the Master Facilities Plan which is part of the Nexus Plan and the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan.
F. Detailed study of the impacts of future residential and nonresidential construction in the City, along with an analysis of the need for the potential acquisition and expansion of circulation systems has been prepared. This study is included in the Nexus Report. 12-3209.004/76802
1 114
Ordinance No. 3944
G. As set forth in the Nexus Report, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the potential acquisition and expansion of existing circulation system elements and increase the number of vehicles set forth in this Chapter and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged. In addition, there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development to which the fee is charged and a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the system or portion thereof attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
SECTION 2. Sections 17.65.050, 17.64.070, 17.65.090, 17.65.100, and 17.65.120 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows:
17.65.050 Establishment of a Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee. A Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee is hereby established. Any person who, 60 days after the effective date of this Chapter, seeks to develop land, or modify the use of land within the City, by applying for a building permit or other entitlement for use, or an extension of a building permit or other entitlement for use previously granted, for a development project that will generate net additional vehicle trips on City streets, is hereby required to pay a Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee in the manner and amount specified in the current City of Huntington Beach Fee Resolution separately adopted.
The City Council shall, by resolution, set the specific amount of the fee, applicability of the fee, a formula for adjusting the fee to account for annual inflation in transportation improvement construction costs, describe the benefit and impact area on which the development impact fee is imposed, list the specific public improvements to be constructed, and describe the estimated cost of these facilities.
This fee shall be adjusted as provided in the resolution setting the specific amount of the Fee.
17.65.070 Calculation and Payment of the Traffic Impact Fee (a) Fee Calculation. The Public Works Director shall be responsible for calculating the Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee required by this Chapter, in accordance with the Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council.
The applicable amount of the fee shall be estimated at least 60 days prior to the first public hearing for any discretionary planning approvals required by City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The estimated fee shall identify the use category, the vehicle trip-miles for the use and the total estimated for fee based upon the proposed size of the developments. The fee estimated shall be recalculated as needed at the time a building permit is issued, based on the vehicle trip generation characteristics of the final development plan for which the building permit is issued. (b) Payment Procedure for Commercial or Industrial Development Projects. Fees required by this Chapter from a New Commercial or Industrial Development Project shall be paid at the time that the City issues a building permit for the Project. ( (c) Payment Procedure for Residential Development Projects. The fee required by this Chapter from a New Residential Development Project shall be paid before final inspection of the dwelling unit on which the fee was imposed. However, the Planning Director may adopt procedures to advance the time the fee is due on Residential Development Projects consistent with Government Code Section 66007, as amended. 12-3209.004/76802
2 115
Ordinance No. 3944
(d) Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects. If a Development Project will be constructed in phases, and separate building permits and certificates of occupancy will be issued for each phase, fees imposed pursuant to this Chapter shall be calculated on the basis of the vehicle trip characteristics of the entire Development Project. Payment of the fees may be made separately for each phase, provided the amount paid for each phase shall be equal to the percentage that the vehicle trips for that phase represent of the total development project's vehicle trips. The fee per vehicle trip shall be the fee in effect at the time payment is due. (3827-4/09, 3879-6/10)
(e) Deposit of Fees. All Traffic Impact Fees collected shall be transferred for deposit into a separate reserve account, as specified in this Chapter, and used solely for the purposes specified in this Chapter. (3827-4/09, 3879-6/10)
17.65.090 Fee Refunds. Upon application, fees collected by the City pursuant to this Chapter shall be refunded only under the following circumstances:
(a) Erroneous or Illegal Collection. Fees will be refunded if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director that they were erroneously or illegally collected, or if the City is compelled to do so pursuant to a final judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction. An application for a refund pursuant to this Section shall be filed within ninety (90) days after the payment of the fees pursuant to Section 17.65.070. (b) City Failure to Commit Funds. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66001(e), fees will be refunded if the City fails to commit them to a surface transportation improvement project of the nature or type identified in the Master Facilities Plan, which is part of the Nexus Report, within five years from the date that the fees were collected from the applicant. For purposes of this subsection, fees are deemed to have been "committed" if they have been budgeted or otherwise encumbered by the City for an eligible improvement, studies, design drawings or any necessary applications for approval by other governmental agencies have been initiated, construction bidding has been initiated, or improvements are under construction. Eligible refunds, plus interest at the City's average annual cost of funds, will be made only upon an application filed within 180 days of the expiration of the fifth anniversary of the fee payment.
17.65.100 Fee Credits for Construction of Citywide Surface Transportation Improvements (a) An applicant for a New Development project shall be entitled to a credit against the amount of the Master Facilities Plan otherwise required by this Chapter, if the applicant agrees to dedicate right-of-way needed for, or construct a traffic improvement listed in the Master Facilities Plan. No credit shall be given for site-related improvements or site- related right-of-way dedications.
(b) Application. A separate application shall be filed for each adjustment request made pursuant to this Section. Such application shall be filed with the Public Works Director on a form provided by the Director, not later than:
(1) Thirty (30) days prior to the first public hearing on an applicable discretionary permit application for the development project, pursuant to the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance; or
(2) If no such discretionary permit is required, at the time of application for a building permit for the development project. Each application shall provide the documentation and assurances specified below.
12-3209.004/76802
3 116
117
Director- of Beblic Works
City Manager
Ordinance No. 3944
requisite nexus between the fee amount and the use of fee proceeds. City administrative costs shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the Reserve Account balance in any fiscal year. (e) No Reserve Account funds shall be used to pay for capital improvements that are associated with existing arterial street segment or signalized intersection Level of Service deficiencies, except to the extent that new development contributes to the further degradation of operations, nor shall Reserve Account funds be used for periodic surface transportation system maintenance.
SECTION 3. Sections 17.65.030, 17.65.040, and 17.65.080 are hereby deleted in entirety from this chapter.
SECTION 4. Section 17.65.050 is hereby added to this chapter, said section to read as follows:
17.65.150 Severabilitv. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision; and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 5. All other sections of Chapter 17.65 not modified by this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 20_.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1 12-3209.004/76802
5 118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
KEY
INSERTIONS: Double underline
DELETIONS Strikethrough
the Transportation System Needs Analysis Master Facilities Plan, or such other report as may be prepared from time to time to document the reasonable fair share of the costs to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development. Such expenditures may include, but are not necessarily limited to the following:
(a) Reimbursement for all direct and indirect costs incurred by the City to construct surface transportation improvements pursuant to this Chapter, including the cost of land and right- of-way acquisition, planning, legal advice, engineering, design, construction and equipment.
Reimburse the City for the construction of surface transportation projects of the nature or type identified in the Transportation System Needs Analysis Master Facilities Plan, or such other report as may be prepared from time to time to document the reasonable fair share of the costs to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development constructed by the City with local funds from other sources.
(c) Costs of issuance or debt service associated with bonds, notes or other security instruments issued to fund surface transportation improvements identified in the Transportation System Needs Analysis Master Facilities Plan.
(d) Reimbursement for administrative costs incurred by the City in establishing or maintaining the Reserve Account required by this Chapter, including the cost of studies to establish the requisite nexus between the fee amount and the use of fee proceeds. City administrative costs shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the Reserve Account balance in any fiscal year. (e) No Reserve Account funds shall be used to pay for capital improvements that are associated with existing arterial street segment or signalized intersection Level of Service deficiencies, except to the extent that new development contributes to the further degradation of operations, nor shall Reserve Account funds be used for periodic surface transportation system maintenance.
17.65.130 Annual Program Review and Periodic Adjustment of the Fee Within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the City Council shall review the status of compliance with this Chapter, including the amount of fees collected, expenditures from the Reserve Account, and the degree to which the fees collected pursuant to this Chapter are assisting the City to mitigate the surface transportation impacts of new development. At least every five (5) years after the effective date of the Ordinance enacting this Chapter, the Public Works Director shall prepare, and the City Council shall consider, the fee formula established to implement this Chapter, whether any adjustment in the fee foiinula or use of fee proceeds is warranted, or any other changes are needed to the procedures established by this Chapter, to fulfill the goals, objectives or policies of the City's General Plan. Each year between periodic reviews of the fee formula, the fee shall be increased by a factor to account for inflation in surface transportation construction costs, as provided in the City Council resolution setting the fee amount. (3617-10/03)
17.65.140 Preparation of Implementation Guidelines
Within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the Ordinance enacting this Chapter, the Director of Public Works shall prepare administrative guidelines to implement the provisions of this Chapter. The guidelines shall include administrative procedures, example fee calculations, application forms and such other information that will assist City staff, decision makers, Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.65 Page 9 of 11 6/2/10
12-3209.004/78740
(b)
127
128
ATTACHMENT #5
129
130
Ordinance No. 3945
17.67.010 Intent and Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a Library Development Impact Fee upon future Development Projects, an equitable share of the cost of mitigating future Library Facility needs created by such projects.
A Library Development Impact Fee is being created for the purpose of assuring that the impacts created by new developments in the City of Huntington Beach pay a fair share of the proportional costs required for expansion of library facilities and collections.
This Chapter is intended to implement the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, as well as following recommendations in the Master Facilities Plan, a part of the Nexus Report (as described below), and the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan by ensuring that the City's expansion of library facilities and collections are maintained when new development is constructed within the City limits. By imposing a fee that is reasonably related to the burdens created by new development on the City's Library Services, together with funding available from other City revenue sources, the City will be able to construct the required capital improvements, accommodate projected growth and fulfill the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan and Master Facilities Plan a part of the Nexus Repor6.
It is the intent of the City Council that the fee required by this Chapter shall be supplementary to any conditions imposed upon a development project pursuant to other provisions of the Municipal Code, the Subdivision Map Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, other state and local laws, ordinances or chapter provisions which may authorize the imposition of conditions on development.
17.67.015 Legislative Findings.
A. The State of California, through the enactment of Government Code Sections 66001 through 66009 has authorized the City to enact development impact fees.
B. The imposition of development impact fees is a method of ensuring that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of capital facilities and other costs necessary to accommodate such development. These fees are established to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare.
C. Increase in residential development in the City increases the demand on the amount of library space and collection items.
D. Pursuant to the "Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach" ("Nexus Report") dated October, 2011, as amended April 27, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in these findings as though set forth in full, the fees established pursuant to this Chapter are derived from, based upon, and do not exceed the costs of providing additional library services attributable to applicable new residential development. This study is based in part upon master planning to more specifically identify capital facilities to serve new development; the expansion of the amount of library facilities space and the number of collection items in the systems. 12-3209.005/77615
2 131
132
Ordinance No. 3945
must be filed in the same manner and will be considered pursuant to the same procedure as for a fee adjustment as provided in Chapter 17.73. The following shall be exempted from payment of the Library Development Impact Fee:
1. Residential development.
a. Alteration or expansion of an existing residential building in which no additional dwelling units are created, the use is not changed and where no additional library services will be provided over and above those provided by the existing building;
b. The replacement of a destroyed or partially destroyed building or structure with a new building or structure of the same size and use, provided that no additional library services will be required over and above those provided by the original use of the land;
c. The construction of residential accessory buildings, structures or uses which will not require additional library services over and above those provided by the principal building or use of the land;
d. The installation of a replacement mobilehome on a lot or other such site when a Library Development Impact Fee for such mobilehome site has previously been paid pursuant to this Chapter, or where a mobilehome legally existed on such site on or prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Chapter;
e. Construction, replacement or rebuilding of a single-family dwelling (one (1) unit per lot) on an existing lot of record, or the replacement of one (1) mobilehome with another on the same pad, or the moving and relocation of a single-family home from one (1) lot within the City to another lot within the City. This exemption shall not apply to tract development, to the development of more than one (1) unit per lot, nor to the replacement of a single-family dwelling with more than one (I) dwelling unit;
2. Affordable housing for lower income households. Property rented, leased, sold, conveyed or otherwise transferred, at a rental price or purchase price which does not exceed the "affordable housing cost," as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code when provided to a "lower income household" as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code or "very low-income household" as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code. This exemption shall require the applicant to execute an agreement to guarantee that the units shall be maintained for lower and very low-income households whether as units for rent or for sale or transfer. The agreement shall be in the form of a deed restriction or other legally binding and enforceable document acceptable to the City Attorney and shall bind the owner and any successor-in-interest to the real property being developed. The agreement shall 12-3209.005/77615 4
133
Ordinance No. 3945
subordinate, if required, to any state or federal program providing affordable housing to lower and very low-income households. The agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Applicant or any successor-in-interest shall be required to provide annually, or as requested, the names of all tenants or purchasers, current rents and income certification to insure compliance. Voluntary removal of the housing restriction or violation of the restriction shall require the applicant or any successor-in-interest to pay the then applicable Library Development Impact Fee at the time of voluntary conversion or as imposed at the time of violation on the unit in violation, plus any attorneys' fees and costs of enforcement, if applicable; B. Credits. Any applicant whose development is located within a community facilities district (CFD) or, and is subject to the assessments thereof, shall receive an offset credit towards the fees established by this Chapter to the extent that the assessments fund improvements within the CFD which would otherwise be funded by the Development Impact Fees established by this Chapter.
17.67.045 Calculation of Required Fees.
A. At the time of the issuance of the building permit, the Director of Planning and Building or his/her designee ("Director") shall calculate the amount of the applicable Library Development Impact Fee due as specified in the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee.
B. The Director shall calculate the amount of the applicable Library Development Impact Fee due by:
1. Determining the number and type of dwelling units in a residential development or mobilehome pads in a mobilehome park or site, and multiplying the same by the Library Development Impact Fee amount per dwelling unit or pad as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
2. Determining the gross square feet of floor area, or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a nonresidential development, and multiplying the same by the Library Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
3. Determining the number and type of dwelling units and the nonresidential number of lodging units or gross square feet of floor area, type of use and location in a structure containing mixed uses which include a residential use, and multiplying the same by the Library Development Impact Fee amount for each use as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
4. Determining the gross square feet of floor area, or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a structure containing mixed uses which include two (2) or more nonresidential principal uses, and multiplying the same by the Library Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution. The 12-3209.005/77615
5 134
Ordinance No. 3945
gross square feet of floor area of any accessory use will be charged at the same rate as the predominant principal use unless the Department of Planning and Building finds that the accessory use is related to another principal use.
17.67.050 Payment of Fees.
A The City shall collect from the applicant the Library Development Impact Fee prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, final building permit approval or construction approval for mobilehome pad or pads, whichever occurs first.
B Except for any adjustment charge allocated to the City all funds collected shall be properly identified and promptly transferred for deposit in the library facilities impact fee fund and used solely for the purposes specified in this Chapter.
17.67.055 Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects. If a Development Project will be constructed in phases, and separate building permits and certificates of occupancy will be issued for each phase, fees imposed pursuant to this Chapter shall be calculated on the basis of the development characteristics of the entire Development Project. Payment of the fees may be made separately for each phase, provided the amount paid for each phase shall be equal to the percentage that that phase represents of the total development project's development characteristics. The fee shall be the fee in effect at the time payment is due.
17.67.060 - Refund.
A. Any applicant who has paid a Library Development Impact Fee pursuant to this Chapter may apply to the Director for a full or partial refund of same, if, within one (1) year after collection of the Library Development Impact Fee the fee has been modified as follows:
reduction in the number of dwelling units, a change in the type of dwelling units, a reduction in square footage, or the applicability of an exemption pursuant to this Chapter.
In the event a refund is issued, the City may retain a sum up to twenty (20%) percent of the Development Impact Fee paid by the applicant to offset the administrative costs of refund. In no event shall a refund exceed the amount of the Library Development Impact Fee actually paid.
B. Erroneous or Illegal Collection. Fees will be refunded if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Director that they were erroneously or illegally collected. If the Director determines the fees were not erroneously or illegally collected, then the applicant may appeal the decision pursuant to Chapter 17.73 Appeals. An application for a refund pursuant to this Section MUST be filed within ninety (90) days after the payment of the fees.
C. City Failure to Commit Funds. Pursuant to the Mitigated Fee Act, upon application of the then current landowner, fees will be refunded if the City fails to commit them to a project of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report within five years from the date that the fees were collected from the applicant. For purposes of this subsection, fees 12-3209.005/77615 6
135
Ordinance No. 3945
are deemed to have been "committed" if they have been budgeted or otherwise encumbered by the City for an eligible improvement, studies, design drawings or any necessary applications for approval by other governmental agencies have been initiated, construction bidding has been initiated, or improvements are under construction. Eligible refunds, plus interest at the City's average annual cost of funds will be made only upon an application filed within 180 days of the expiration of the fifth anniversary of the fee payment.
17.67.065 Use of Funds
A. Funds collected from the Library Development Impact Fee shall be used to fund the costs of expansion of the amount of library space and the number of collection items in the Library's collection attributable to new residential construction and shall include:
1. The acquisition of additional property for Library expansion;
2. The construction of new facilities for Library Services;
3. The furnishing of new buildings or facilities for Library Services;
4. The purchase of Library collections to expand the collections;
5. The funding of a master plan to identify capital facilities to serve new users and patrons;
6. The cost of financing (e.g., interest payments).
7. Projects identified in the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan, adopted annual City of Huntington Beach budget, or City Council approved development projects.
B. Funds shall not be used for periodic or routine maintenance or to maintain or repair existing buildings.
C. Revenue raised would be limited to capitalized cost related to growth.
D. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are issued for advanced provision of capital facilities for which Library Development Impact Fees may be expended, impact fees may be used to pay debt service on such bonds or similar debt instruments to the extent that the facilities provided are of the type described in this Chapter.
E. Funds may be used to provide refunds as described in this Chapter.
17.67.070 Fee Adjustments Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code 12-3209.005/77615
7 136
Ordinance No. 3945
17.67.072 Appeals Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code
17.67.075 Credit for Construction of Non-Site-Related Improvements. Applications for credit for construction of non-site-related improvements shall include acceptable engineering drawings, specifications and construction cost estimates submitted to the Director. The Director shall determine the amount of the credit for improvement construction based on either these cost estimates or alternative estimates if the Director determines reasonably that the estimates submitted by the applicant are either unreliable or inaccurate. In no event shall the amount of the credit exceed the improvement cost specified in the Nexus Report, or other applicable basis for the fee, nor shall the credit exceed the amount that would otherwise apply.
No final inspection or certificate of occupancy for the Development Project may be issued until:
(1) the construction is completed and accepted by the City; (2) a suitable maintenance and warranty bond is received and accepted by the City; and (3) all design, construction, inspection, testing, bonding and acceptance procedures are in strict compliance with City paving, drainage and other applicable requirements.
17.67.080 Eligible Expenditures From Fee Reserve Account. All monies and interest earnings in any Reserve Account shall be expended on the projects of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report, or such other report as may be prepared from time to time to document the reasonable fair share of the costs to mitigate the impact of new development on the expansion of Library Services and collections.
17.67.090 Annual report and amendment procedures.
A. Within one hundred eighty (180) days after the last day of each fiscal year, the Director of Library Services of the City of Huntington Beach shall evaluate progress in implementation of the Library Development Impact Fee and shall prepare a report thereon to the City Council in accordance with Government Code Section 66006, incorporating among other things:
1. The expansion of Library Services and collections commenced, purchased or completed utilizing monies from the Library Development Impact Fee fund;
2. The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned;
3. The amount of Library Development Impact Fees in the fund; and Recommended changes to the Library Development Impact Fee, including, but not necessarily limited to changes in this Library Development Impact Fee chapter or fee resolution.
B. Based upon the report and such other factors as the City Council deems relevant and applicable, the City Council may amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution implementing this Chapter. Changes to the Library Development Impact Fee rates or schedules may be made by amending the fee resolution. Any change which 12-3209.005/77615 8
137
INITIATED AND V_ED:
.25-7;---
Dire&o(Of Efbrary Services C.)
Ordinance No. 3945
increases the amount of the Library Development Impact Fee shall be adopted by the City Council only after a noticed public hearing. Nothing herein precludes the City Council or limits its discretion to amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution establishing Library Development Impact Fee rates or schedules at such other times as may be deemed necessary.
17.67.100 Effect of Library Development Impact Fee on zoning and subdivision regulations. This Chapter shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density/intensity of development, design and improvement standards and public improvement requirements or any other aspect of the development of land or construction of buildings, which may be imposed by the City pursuant to the City's zoning regulations, subdivision regulations or other ordinances or regulations of the City, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation with respect to all residential and nonresidential development.
17.67.110 Violation—Penalty. A violation of this Chapter shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors are prosecuted; and upon conviction, the violator shall be punishable according to law. However, in addition to or in lieu of any criminal prosecution, the City shall have the power to sue in civil court to enforce the provisions of this Chapter.
17.67.120 Severability. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision; and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 20 .
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Manager
12-3209.005/77615
9 138
ATTACHMENT #6
139
ORDINANCE NO. 3946
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADDING CHAPTER 17.76 RELATING TO PARKLAND ACQUISITION
AND PARK FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to add Chapter 17.76, said chapter to read as follows:
Chapter 17.76
PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND PARK FACILITIES
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Sections
17.76.010 Legislative findings.
17.76.020 Intent and Purpose.
17.76.030 Definitions.
17.76.040 Parkland Acquisition, and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee.
17.76.050 Fund Established.
17.76.060 Fee imposed.
17.76.070 Calculation of Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee.
17.76.075 Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects
17.76.076 Fee Adjustments.
17.76.080 Payment of fee.
17.76.090 Use of funds.
17.76.100 Refund.
17.76.110 Exemptions and credits.
17.76.120 Appeals.
17.76.130 Credit for Construction of Non-Site Related Improvements.
17.76.140 Eligible Expenditures from Fee Reserve Account
17.76.150 Annual report and amendment procedures.
17.76.160 Effect of Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee on zoning and subdivision regulations.
17.76.170 Violation—Penalty.
17.76.180 Severability.
1 12-3209.002/79301
140
Ordinance No. 3946
17.76.010 - Legislative findings.
A. The State of California, through the enactment of Government Code Sections 66001 through 66009 has authorized the City to enact development impact fees.
B. The imposition of development impact fees is a method of ensuring that new development bears a proportionate share of the cost of capital facilities and other costs necessary to accommodate such development. These fees are established to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare.
C. A well-planned park system, with a variation in the size and nature of facilities offered is an important amenity to residents of the City. The City considers a mixture of passive and active park space uses optimal. Future residential development that does not require subdivision, will impact the City's existing park system by creating additional park users thus necessitating additional space for athletic fields, community facilities "tot lots," and other active uses and passive uses as well as passive space for businesses to enjoy.
D. Funds to pay for the cost of acquisition and development of additional parkland and development of currently owned but underutilized parkland as well as development of facilities will be needed to serve the increasing users caused by development in the City. Without additional parks, parks development and community facilities, the City's current parks and community facilities will become overcrowded and overused.
E. Pursuant to the "Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach" ("Nexus Report") dated October, 2011, as amended April 27, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in these findings as though set forth in full, the fees established pursuant to this Chapter are derived from, based upon, and do not exceed the costs of parkland acquisition, park development and community facilities attributable to applicable new residential or nonresidential development.
This study is based in part upon master planning to more specifically identify capital facilities to serve new development; the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland and park development and community facilities.
F. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be used to finance the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland, park development, and community facilities in furtherance of the City General Plan, as well as identified in the Nexus Report, and the attached City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Development Plan, and the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan.
F. A detailed study of the impacts of future residential and nonresidential construction in the City, along with an analysis of the need for the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland and park facilities development is set forth in the Nexus Report.
G. As set forth in the Nexus Report, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland, park development, 2 12-3209.002/79301
141
Ordinance No. 3946
community facilities, and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding fee is charged. In addition, there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development to which the fee is charged and a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facilities or portion thereof attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.
17.76.020 — Intent and Purpose.
A Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact fee is being created for the purpose of assuring that the impacts created by new development in the City of Huntington Beach pay a fair share of the proportional costs for the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland, park development and community use facilities and related costs necessary to accommodate such development. This fee was once identified as a development impact fee in Resolution 2002-129 created pursuant to Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance section 230.20.
This Chapter is intended to implement the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, as well as following the recommendations in the Nexus Report including the Master Facilities Plan and the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan by ensuring that the City's acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland and conu -nunity facilities development are maintained when new development is constructed within the City limits. By imposing a fee that is reasonably related to the burdens created by new development on the City's parklands, together with funding available from other City revenue sources, the City will be able to purchase land and construct the required capital improvements to accommodate projected growth and fulfill the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan and Master Facilities Plan a part of the Nexus Report.
It is the intent of the City Council that the fee required by this Chapter shall be supplementary to any conditions imposed upon a development project pursuant to other provisions of the Municipal Code, the Subdivision Map Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, other state and local laws, ordinances or chapter provisions which may authorize the imposition of conditions on development.
17.76.030 - Definitions. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.76.040 - Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee. There is imposed a Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee on all non- subdivided new residential and nonresidential development.
17.76.050 - Fund established. A Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee fund is established. The Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee fund is a fund to be utilized for payment of the actual or estimated costs of parldand acquisition and community facilities development as set forth in Chapter 8 of the Nexus Report which includes the City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan, as well as the City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan related to new residential and nonresidential construction.
3 12-3209.002/79301
142
Ordinance No. 3946
17.76.060 - Fee imposed.
A. Any person who, 60 days after the effective date of this Development Impact Fee, seeks to engage in non-subdivided Residential or Nonresidential development by obtaining a building permit or other discretionary approval is required to pay a Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee in the manner and amount as set forth in the current City of Huntington Beach Fee Resolution separately adopted.
B. No certificate of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, or building permit approval for the activities listed in this Chapter, shall be issued unless and until the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee required by this Chapter has been paid to the City.
17.76.070 - Calculation of Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee.
A. At the time of the issuance of the building permit, the Director of Planning and Building or his/her designee ("Director") shall calculate the amount of the applicable Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee due as specified in the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee.
B. The Director shall calculate the amount of the applicable Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee due by:
1. Determining the number and type of dwelling units in a residential development and multiplying the same by the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee amount per dwelling unit or pad as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
2. Determining the gross square feet of floor area or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a nonresidential development, and multiplying the same by the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
3. Determining the number and type of dwelling units and the nonresidential number of lodging units or gross square feet of floor area, type of use and location, in a structure containing mixed uses which include a residential use, and multiplying the same by the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee amount for each use as established by the current fee resolution setting the amount of the fee;
4. Determining the gross square feet of floor area or number of lodging units, type of use and location in a structure containing mixed uses which include 4 12-3209.002/79301
143
Ordinance No. 3946
two (2) or more nonresidential principal uses, and multiplying the same by the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee amount as established by the current fee resolution. The gross square feet of floor area of any accessory use will be charged at the same rate as the predominant principal use unless the Department of Planning and Building finds that the accessory use is related to another principal use.
17.76.075 Fee Payments for Phased Development Projects. If a Development Project will be constructed in phases, and separate building pelinits and certificates of occupancy will be issued for each phase, fees imposed pursuant to this Chapter shall be calculated on the basis of the development characteristics of the entire Development Project. Payment of the fees may be made separately for each phase, provided the amount paid for each phase shall be equal to the percentage that that phase represents of the total development project's development characteristics. The fee shall be the fee in effect at the time payment is due.
17.76.076 Fee Adjustments. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.76.080 Payment of fee.
A. The City shall collect from the applicant the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, or final building permit approval.
B. Except for any administrative charge allocated to the City, all funds collected shall be properly identified and promptly transferred for deposit in the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee fund and used solely for the- purposes specified in this Chapter.
17.76.090 Use of funds.
A. Funds collected from the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be used to fund the costs of providing the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland and park facilities development attributable to new residential and nonresidential construction and shall include:
1. The acquisition of additional property for the expansion of parkland and community facilities development;
2. The construction of new parks and park facilities and community use facilities (except for non-residential as set forth in the Nexus report) and;
3. The funding of a master plan to identify capital facilities to serve new parkland and park facilities and community use facilities development;
4. The cost of financing (e.g., interest payments).
5 12-3209.002/79301
144
Ordinance No. 3946
5. Projects identified in City of Huntington Beach General Plan, the Master Facilities Plan included in the Nexus Report, City of Huntington Beach Capital Improvement Plan, adopted annual City of Huntington Beach budget, or City Council approved park acquisition and development projects.
B. Funds shall not be used for periodic or routine maintenance or to maintain or repair existing parkland or park facilities or community facilities.
C. Revenue raised would be limited to capitalized cost related to growth.
D. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are issued for advanced provision of capital facilities for which Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees may be expended, impact fees may be used to pay debt service on such bonds or similar debt instruments to the extent that the facilities provided are of the type described in this Chapter.
E. Funds may be used to provide refunds as described in this Chapter.
17.76.100 Refund.
A. Any applicant who has paid a Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee(s) pursuant to this Chapter may apply to the Director for a full or partial refund of same, if, within one (1) year after collection of the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee the Fee has been modified as follows:
reduction in the number of dwelling units, a change in the type of dwelling units, a reduction in square footage, or the applicability of an exemption pursuant to this Chapter. In the event a refund is issued, the City may retain a sum up to twenty (20%) percent of the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee paid by the applicant to offset the administrative costs of refund. In no event shall a refund exceed the amount of the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee actually paid.
B. Erroneous or Illegal Collection. Fees will be refunded if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Director that they were erroneously or illegally collected. If the Director determines the fees were not erroneously or illegally collected, then the applicant may appeal the decision pursuant to Chapter 17.73.030 Appeals. An application for a refund pursuant to this Section must be filed within ninety (90) days after the payment of the fees.
C. City Failure to Commit Funds. Pursuant to the Mitigated Fee Act, upon application of the then current landowner, fees will be refunded if the City fails to commit them to a project of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report within five years from the date that the fees were collected from the applicant. For purposes of this subsection, fees are deemed to have been "committed" if they have been budgeted or otherwise encumbered by the City for an eligible improvement, studies, design drawings or any necessary applications for approval by other governmental agencies have been 6 12-3209.002/79301
145
Ordinance No. 3946
initiated, construction bidding has been initiated, or improvements are under construction. Eligible refunds, plus interest at the City's average annual cost of funds, will be made only upon an application filed within 180 days of the expiration of the fifth anniversary of the fee payment.
17.76.110 Exemptions and credits.
A. Exemptions. Any claim of exemption must be made no later than the time of application for a building permit or construction approval. Any claim of exemption must be filed in the same manner and will be considered pursuant to the same procedure as for a fee adjustment as provided in this Chapter 17.73. The following shall be exempted from payment of the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee:
1. Residential Development
a. Alteration or expansion of an existing residential building in which no additional dwelling units are created, the use is not changed, and where no additional relocation and expansion of parkland and park facilities development will be provided over and above those provided by the existing building;
b. The replacement of a destroyed or partially destroyed building or structure with a new building or structure of the same size and use, provided that no additional relocation or expansion of parkland and park facilities development will be required over and above those provided by the original use of the land;
c. The construction of residential accessory buildings, structures or uses which will not require additional acquisition, relocation or expansion of parkland and park facilities development over and above those provided by the principal building or use of the land;
d. Construction, replacement or rebuilding of a single-family dwelling (one (1) unit per lot) on an existing lot of record, or the moving and relocation of a single-family home from one (1) lot within the City to another lot within the City. This exemption shall not apply to tract development, to the development of more than one (1) unit per lot, nor to the replacement of a single-family dwelling with more than one (1) dwelling unit;
2. Affordable housing for lower income households. Property rented, leased, sold, conveyed or otherwise transferred, at a rental price or purchase price which does not exceed the "affordable housing cost," as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code when provided to a "lower income household" as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety 7 12-3209.002/79301
146
Ordinance No. 3946
Code or "very low-income household" as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code. This exemption shall require the applicant to execute an agreement to guarantee that the units shall be maintained for lower and very low-income households whether as units for rent or for sale or transfer. The agreement shall be in the form of a deed restriction or other legally binding and enforceable document acceptable to the City Attorney and shall bind the owner and any successor-in-interest to the real property being developed. The agreement shall subordinate, if required, to any state or federal program providing affordable housing to lower and very low-income households. The agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Applicant or any successor-in-interest shall be required to provide annually, or as requested, the names of all tenants or purchasers, current rents and income certification to insure compliance. Voluntary removal of the housing restriction or violation of the restriction shall require the applicant or any successor-in-interest to pay the then applicable Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee at the time of voluntary conversion or as imposed at the time of violation on the unit in violation, plus any attorneys' fees and costs of enforcement, if applicable;
B. Credits. Any applicant whose development is located within a community facilities district (CFD) or , and is subject to the assessments thereof, shall receive an offset credit towards the fees established by this Chapter to the extent that the assessments fund improvements within the CFD which would otherwise be funded by the development impact fees established by this Chapter.
17.76.120 Appeals. Shall be as set forth in Chapter 17.73 of this Code.
17.76.130 Credit for Construction of Non-Site-Related Improvements. Applications for credit for construction of non-site-related improvements shall submit applicable engineering drawings, specifications and construction cost estimates or the like to the Director. The Director shall determine any credit for improvement based on either these cost estimates or alternative estimates if the Director determines reasonably that the estimates submitted by the applicant are either unreliable or inaccurate. In no event shall the amount of the credit exceed the improvement cost specified in the Nexus Report, or other applicable basis for the fee, nor shall the credit exceed the amount that would otherwise apply.
No final inspection or certificate of occupancy for the Development Project may be issued until: (1) the construction is completed and accepted by the City; (2) a suitable maintenance and warranty bond is received and accepted by the City; and (3) all design, construction, inspection, testing, bonding and acceptance procedures are in strict compliance with City paving, drainage and other applicable requirements.
17.76.140 Eligible Expenditures From Fee Reserve Account. All monies and interest earnings in any Reserve Account shall be expended on the projects of the nature or type identified in the Nexus Report, or such other report as may be prepared from time to time to 8 12-3209.002/79301
147
Ordinance No. 3946
document the reasonable fair share of the costs to mitigate the acquisition, relocation and expansion of parkland and park facilities development impacts of new development.
17.76.150 Annual report and amendment procedures.
A. Within one hundred eighty (180) days after the last day of each fiscal year, the Deputy City Manager of the City of Huntington Beach shall evaluate progress in implementation of the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee and shall prepare a report thereon to the City Council in accordance with Government Code Section 66006, incorporating among other things:
1. Any parkland acquisition, park development and community facilities development commenced, purchased or completed utilizing monies from the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee fund;
2. The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned;
3. The amount of Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees in the fund; and
4. Any recommended changes to the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee, including, but not necessarily limited to changes in this Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee chapter or fee resolution.
B. Based upon the report and such other factors as the City Council deems relevant and applicable, the City Council may amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution implementing this Chapter. Changes to the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee rates or schedules may be made by amending the fee resolution. Any change which increases the amount of the Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee shall be adopted by the City Council only after a noticed public hearing. Nothing herein precludes the City Council or limits its discretion to amend the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the fee resolution establishing Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee rates or schedules at such other times as may be deemed necessary.
17.76.160 Effect of Parkland Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Impact Fee on zoning and subdivision regulations. This Chapter shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density/intensity of development, design and improvement standards and public improvement requirements or any other aspect of the development of land or construction of buildings, which may be imposed by the City pursuant to the City's zoning regulations, subdivision regulations or other ordinances or regulations of the City, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation with respect to all residential and nonresidential development.
9 12-3209.002/79301
148
City Attorney 5,
Ordinance No. 3946
17.76.170 Violation—Penalty. A violation of this Chapter shall be prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors are prosecuted; and upon conviction, the violator shall be punishable according to law. However, in addition to or in lieu of any criminal prosecution, the City shall have the power to sue in civil court to enforce the provisions of this Chapter.
17.76.180 Severability. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision; and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 20 .
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
INITI l ig AN b a c ROVED:
141111,74S" AW
Deputy City Manager
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Manager
10 12-3209.002/79301
149
ATTACHMENT #7
150
151
Ordinance No. 3947
(g) "City Manager" means the City Manager or his/her designee of the City of Huntington Beach.
(h) "Collect" or "collection" means the point in time at which the development impact fee(s) are paid by the applicant. Collection will occur on the date of final inspection or the date a certificate of occupancy or temporary certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first, or in the case of a mobilehome pad or pads, collection will occur at or on the date of construction approval is issued.
"Collections" shall mean books, magazines, DVDs, compact disks, computer programs, digital resources and other reference and circulation materials. (j) "Commercial or Industrial Development Project" shall mean the construction of new Floor Area on a lot in any of the Non-Residential Zoning Districts of the City. (k) "Community Use Facilities" shall mean facilities dedicated for community use for social, community and educational groups.
(1) "Detached Dwelling Unit" shall mean a detached building or buildings designed primarily for use as a dwelling, with one or more habitable rooms with only one kitchen, and designed for occupancy as a unit by one or more persons living as a household unit with common access to all living, kitchen and bathroom areas, no portion of which is rented as a separate unit.
(m)
"Development" means the addition of new dwelling units and/or new nonresidential square footage to an undeveloped, partially developed or redeveloped site and involving the issuance of a building permit and certificate of occupancy for such construction, reconstruction or use. Development may also include expanded uses that create additional impacts on City facilities, infrastructure or park land. Development also includes the approval and construction of new mobilehome pads in existing or new mobilehome parks or sites, but not including the following so long as no additional dwelling units or gross floor area is added:
1. A permit to operate;
2. A permit for the internal alteration, remodeling, rehabilitation, or other improvements or modifications to an existing structure;
3. The rebuilding of a structure destroyed by an act of God or the rehabilitation or replacement of a building in order to comply with the City's seismic safety requirements;
4. Parking facilities; or
5. The rehabilitation or replacement of a building destroyed by imminent public hazard, acts of terrorism, sabotage, vandalism, warfare or civil disturbance except where said destruction was caused or in any manner accomplished, instigated, 12-3209.003/78647
2 152
Ordinance No. 3947
motivated, prompted, incited, induced, influenced, or participated in by any persons or their agents having any interest in the real or personal property at the location.
(n) "Development Project" means any residential, commercial or industrial Development Project. shall mean any construction, addition, alteration or other change of use of a • building or land that requires the City to issue a grading, building, plumbing, mechanical, or electrical permit, or any other form of entitlement. (o) "Director" may mean the Director of Community Services; Director of Library Services; Director of Planning and Building, or Director of Public Works. "Dwelling unit" or "DU" is as defined in Section 203.06 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance ("ZSO").
(q) "Fee resolution" means and refers to the City resolution specifying the development impact fee(s) per dwelling unit or mobilehome pad for residential development and per gross square foot of floor area for nonresidential development, by type and by location. (r) "Fees Calculation Report" shall mean the report prepared for the City entitled "Development Impact Fee(s) Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach" dated October, 2011.
(s) "Floor Area" shall mean the area of all floors and levels as defined in the ZSO. (t) "Government or Public Facilities" shall mean publicly owned buildings and structures used for the purposes of conducting City, County, State of Federal Government business.
Such facilities shall include, but not be limited to, city halls, police and fire stations, offices, equipment yards, sanitation facilities, schools, recreation centers, and similar facilities. Private commercial Development Projects leasing publicly owned land shall not be considered Government or Public Facilities.
(u) "Gross square feet" or "gsf" means the area of a nonresidential development measured from the exterior building lines of each floor with respect to enclosed spaces but excluding parking spaces whether or not enclosed. For purposes of this Chapter, the term "enclosed spaces" specifically includes, but is not limited to, an area available to and customarily used by the general public and all areas of business establishments generally accessible to the public such as fenced, or partially fenced in areas of garden centers attached to and serving the primary structure.
(v) "Land Use Category" shall mean any of the specific land uses that have been listed in the fair share implementation resolution authorized pursuant to Section 17.65.050, and used to provide the basis for future development impact projections. (w) "Library Facilities" shall mean library building space and library materials, which are owned and operated by the City of Huntington Beach.
12-3209.003/78647
3 153
Ordinance No. 3947
(x) "Library Materials" shall mean books, magazines, DVDs, compact disks, computer programs, digital resources and other reference and circulation materials. (y) "Master Facilities Plan" shall mean the report prepared for the City entitled Development Impact Fee Master Facilities Plan, prepared by Revenue & Costs Specialists, LLC, dated October 2011.
(z) "Mobilehome" shall mean a structure transportable in sections which is a minimum of 8 feet in width and 40 feet in length, built on a permanent chassis, and designed to be a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation.
(an) "Nonresidential development" means a development undertaken for the purpose of creating gross floor area, excluding dwelling units, but which includes, and is not limited to commercial, industrial, retail, office, hotel/motel, and warehouse uses involving the issuance of a building permit for such construction, reconstruction or use. (bb) "Planning and Building Director" shall mean the Planning and Building Director of The City of Huntington Beach or his/her designee.
(cc) "Planning Department" shall mean the Planning Department of the City of Huntington Beach.
(dd) "Police Department" means the Police Department of the City of Huntington Beach. (ee) "Residential development" means a development undertaken for the purpose of creating a new dwelling unit or units and involving the issuance of a building permit and certificate of occupancy for such construction, reconstruction or use, or the construction approval for a mobilehome pad or pads.
(ff)
"Residential Development Project" shall mean the construction of a dwelling unit on a lot in any of the residential zoning districts of the City. For purposes of this Chapter, the addition of Floor Area shall be considered construction of a Residential Development project if the additional Floor Area exceeds fifty (50) percent of the existing Floor Area, as determined by the Director of Planning and Building. (gg) "Site-Related Right-of-Way or Improvement Construction" shall mean right-of-way or traffic improvements that must be constructed on the site of a new development project in order to comply with applicable City development regulations and standards. (hh) "Surface Transportation System" shall mean the City's system of streets, roads and intersections traversed by automobiles and other vehicles. (ii) "Trip-Miles" shall mean the number of Vehicle Trips multiplied by the average trip length for a specified use as identified in the "Fee Calculation Report". "Vehicle Trips" shall mean the number of average, daily trips generated by uses of land, as specified in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, and at the discretion of the Public Works Director when the reference 12-3209.003/78647
4 154
Ordinance No. 3947
document does not provide a reasonable representation of vehicle trips for a specific use, special studies or alternative reference documents may be used.
17.73.020 Fee Adjustments
(a) An applicant for a New Development Project subject to a fee required by Title 17 of this Code may apply to the City for a refund, reduction, adjustment or waiver of the fee. (b) Circumstances That May Justify a Fee Adjustment. Examples of circumstances that may justify a fee adjustment include, but are not necessarily limited to the following:
(1) The Development Project includes an existing building that is proposed to be demolished, provided the building proposed to be demolished was capable of being used at the time of the Development Project application, and sufficient information about its prior use is available. Any such adjustment is limited to the amount of the fee that would otherwise be due for the New Development Project. (2) The physical or operating characteristics (e.g., hours of operation) of the New Development Project are substantially different from the land use on which the fee calculation is based.
(3) The New Development Project includes multiple land uses that are complementary. (4) Property values are worth less than the City's estimated value in the methodology.
Likewise, the City may present evidence in the form of an appraisal and the value is in excess of that used in the methodology.
(c) An application for a fee adjustment shall be made and decided as follows:
(1) Application. A separate application shall be filed for each adjustment request made pursuant to this Section. Such application shall be made on a form provided by the Director of Planning and Building or his/her designee and shall be filed with the Director of Planning and Building not later than:
(A) thirty (30) days prior to the first public hearing on an applicable discretionary permit application for the Development Project, pursuant to the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance; or
(B) if no such discretionary permit is required, at the time of application for a building permit for the Development Project.
(d) Each application shall state in detail the factual basis for the requested fee reduction, adjustment or waiver. The Director of Planning and Building shall determine if the application is complete, and if not, may cause the public hearing to be continued until the application is determined to be complete. The Director shall act within 10 days after receipt of the completed application to approve or deny the application. 12-3209.003/78647 5
155
Ordinance No. 3947
17.73.030 Appeals.
(a) An applicant may appeal, by protest, any imposition of the development impact fee(s) by filing a notice of appeal with the City Manager or his/her designee or his/her designee within ninety (90) days after the applicant pays the required development impact fee(s). (b) A valid appeal by protest of the imposition of the development impact fee(s) shall meet all of the following requirements:
1. Tendering in advance of the appeal any required payment in full or providing assurance of payment satisfactory to the City Manager or his/her designee;
2. Serving written notice on the City Manager or his/her designee including:
(A) A statement that the required payment has been tendered under protest or that required conditions have been satisfied;
(B) A statement informing the City Manager or his/her designee of the factual elements of the dispute and the legal theory forming the basis of the protest;
(C) The name and address of the applicant;
(D) The name and address of the property owner;
(E) A description and location of the property;
(F) The number of residential units or nonresidential gross square footage proposed, by land use or dwelling unit type, as appropriate; and (G) The date of issuance of the building permit.
(c)
The City Manager or his/her designee shall schedule a hearing and render a final decision on the applicant's appeal within sixty (60) days after the date the applicant files a valid appeal.
(d) The hearing shall be administrative. Evidence shall be submitted by the City Manager or his/her designee and by the applicant and testimony shall be taken under oath. (e) The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to establish that the applicant is not subject to the imposition of the development impact fee(s) pursuant to the applicable development impact fee ordinance and applicable state law. (f)
If the development impact fee(s) has been paid in full or if the notice of appeal is accompanied by a cash deposit, letter of credit, bond or other surety acceptable to the City Manager or his/her designee in an amount equal to the development impact fee(s) calculated to be due, the application for the building permit or mobilehome construction approval shall be processed. The filing of a notice of appeal shall not stay the imposition or the collection of the development impact fee(s) calculated by the City to be due unless sufficient and acceptable surety has been provided.
(g)
Any petition for judicial review of the City Manager's final decision shall be made in accordance with applicable state law and after the administrative remedies proscribed herein have been exhausted.
12-3209.003/78647
6 156
INITIATED AND ATP/ROVED:
— Deputy City Manager
AS TO FORM:
Cl
7 Ordinance No. 3947
1. Hearing. The City Manager or his/her designee shall consider the fee(s) adjustment application prior to the public hearing as the application for a discretionary development permit for the Development Project, or, if no such permit is required, the City Manager or his/her designee shall consider the application at a separate hearing within (sixty) 60 days after the fee(s) adjustment application is deemed complete by the City Manager or his/her designee.
2. Appeal. Any person may appeal the decision of the City Manager or his/her designee to the City Council, by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the City Manager or his/her designee's decision.
17.73.040 Judicial review.
(a) Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul the development impact fee ordinance, or any provision thereof, or resolution, or amendment thereto, shall be commenced within ninety (90) days of the effective date of the ordinance, resolution, or any amendment thereto.
(b) Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside or annul the imposition or collection of a development impact fee(s) on a development shall be preceded by a valid appeal by protest pursuant to Section 17.73.030 hereof and a final decision of the City Manager or his/her designee pursuant thereto and shall be filed and service of process effected within ninety (90) days after the hearing on appeal regarding the imposition of development impact fee(s) upon the development.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 20 .
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Manager
12-3209.003/78647
157
ATTACHMENT #8
158
159
160
Park Land/Open Space & Facilities (Tract Map/Quimby)
Current Fee
Effective
7/20/12
Effective
7/20/13
Effective
7/20/14
Based on
Land
Detached Dwelling Units (per Unit) Appraisal $12,500 $14,286 $16,071 Based on
Land
Attached Dwelling Units (per Unit) Appraisal $9,685 $11,068 $12,452 Mobile Home Dwelling Units (per Unit) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Hotel/Motel Lodging Units (per Unit) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Resort Lodging Units (per Unit) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Commercial/Office Uses (per sq. ft.) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (per sq. ft.) N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 of 3
Item 9. - 91 HB -226-
161
ATTACH ENT #9
162
Master Facilities Plan
for the City of
Huntington Beach, California
October, 2011
(Amended April 27, 2012)
Copyright, 2009, 2010 & 2011 by Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C.
All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means -- graphic, electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording, taping or taping or information storage and retrieval systems without written permission of:
Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C.
1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C
Fullerton, CA 92831
(714) 992-9020
HB -228-
163
164
Page Two, October 17, 2011 (amended 04/27/12) 141FP Letter to the City of Huntington Beach • A section containing all of the Park Land Acquisition and Development of Recreation Facilities including Community Use Facilities projects.
In addition to the efforts of Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager in coordinating the flow of information, the following staff were instrumental in identifying the required projects:
M. Todd Broussard, P.E.- Principal Civil Engineer (Storm Drainage) David C. Dominguez - Facilities Development and Concessions Manager Eric G. Enberg - Division Chief/Fire Operations
Jim B. Engle Community Services Director
Kevin Justen,- Senior Administrative Analyst - Fire
Tung M. Kao - Info Systems Specialist
Darrin Maresh, Fire Development Specialist
Tony Olmos - City Engineer
Jerry Thompson - General Services Manager
Bill Reardon - Fire Marshall/Division Chief
Dan Richards - Customer Support/GIS Manager
Bob Stachelski - Transportation Manager
Chuck Thomas - Police Captain
Jerry Thompson - General Services Manager
Bob Wingenroth - Director of Finance
RCS appreciates the efforts of the listed staff and any others whose efforts RCS may have been unaware of for their assistance in generating the information provided within this Master Facilities Plan, and we look forward to meeting with the City Council in order to implement and achieve maximum use this comprehensive report.
Sincerely,
SCOTT THORPE
Vice President
Item 9. - 95 HB -230-
165
166
167
City of Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Table of Contents
PK-018 Lamb Park Design and Development 76
PK-019 Central Park Sports Complex Team Room 77
PK-020 Future Parks Acquisition (Possible Closed School Sites) 78 CF-001 Central Park Senior Center 79
CF-002 Edison Community Center Gymnasium 80
CF-003 Murdy Community Center Gymnasium 81
CF-004 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion 82
HB -233- Item 9. - 98
168
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
GUIDE TO THE MASTER FACILITIES PLAN
The Master Facilities Plan is a compilation of projects identified by City staff as being needed for the City of Huntington Beach through theoretical General Plan build-out of the City. The Plan is based on input from City staff, recommended projects contained in the City's several Master Plans for infrastructure and an occasional recommendation from RCS staff.
The Master Facilities Plan generally provides for three major types of projects. The first group of projects provides for the maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the City's varied infrastructure, including its streets, storm drains and other public facilities. These projects represent a very small portion of the needed replacement of the City's fixed assets identified at more than $1.435 million of depreciable fixed assets which are being consumed, conservatively, at an annual rate of just over $19.1 million, (assuming a conservative 75 year infrastructure lifetime). The $1.435 billion figure excludes significant amounts of owned park land, not subject to depreciation, at approximately $678.2 million. The following table indicates the replacement costs of the various infrastructure owned by the City.
Table MFP-1
Replacement Value of Existing Infrastructure
Infrastructure Replacement Value
Law Enforcement $71,246,699
Fire Suppression/Medic $61,234,227
Circulation System (0 $533,539,375
Storm Drainage System (1) $203,631,313
Library Space/Collection $76,593,112
Park Improvements $488,783,370
Total $1,435,028,096
(1) Does not include millions of dollars owned in land right-of-way and Excludes "local" facilities, those limited to neighborhood facilities.
The second group of projects are needed to serve future development and include such projects as widening of streets, creation of additional parkland or construction of a new fire station. These projects are proposed to be funded through the development impact fees recommended in the companion to this document called Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for City of Huntington Beach.
Item 9. - 99
1-1B -234-
169
170
171
172
Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan
Table MFP-2
Cost of Future Infrastructure
Infrastructure Project Totals
Law Enforcement Facilities, et. al. $10,100,895
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities et. al. $11,941,972
Circulation (Streets/Bridges/Signals) $28,537,800
Storm Drainage Collection System $207,494,050
Library Facilities/Collection $7,841,369
Park Land Acquisition & Improvements $137,483,000
Total $403,399,086
Fairness and reason (as well as the more important State and Federal statutes and court decisions) dictate that not all of the projects will qualify for development impact fee funding (i.e. some projects are replacements or service level increasing, etc.). If the City adopts the development impact fees that represent the General Plan Build-out need-based impact fees (Schedule 2.1 in the companion Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report), 42.6% of the required funding (or $172.1 million) would be raised with development impact fees. Existing Development Impact Fee Fund balances of $3.6 million will provide 0.9% of the total project funding and other sources (inter-governmental support) will finance 5.7% ($23.0 million) This leaves 50.8%, or $204.8 million of the total project costs as unfunded, to be financed by other sources such as fees, rates, existing taxes or voter approved additional taxes, inter-governmental transfers and the rare occasional grant.
Relationship to Development Impact Fee Report. The Master Facilities Plan was prepared in conjunction with the City's Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, also prepared by RCS, LLC. Projects listed in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report correspond to projects found in this document and contain the same numbering sequence as the Master Facilities Plan. The Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report is also contains eight chapters specific to each one of these infrastructure sections according to the same category of projects described on the previous page.
Thus, a reader who wants to find more information on Law Enforcement Project No.1 (Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space found on Schedule 3.1 of the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report may turn to Project No. LE-001 of the Master Facilities Plan. For readers of the Master Facilities Plan who wish to understand the determination of development Item 9. - 103 HB -238-
173
Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan
impact fee financing more fully, refer to the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, Chapter One.
vi
HB -239- Item 9. - 104
174
175
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Master Project List
•
L0018 Gothard Street And Slater Avenue
LGO17 Gothard Street And Talbert Avenue
Looia Ward Street And Garfieid Avenue
LGO19 Brookhurst Street And Adams Avenue
LGD20 Miscellaneous Traffic Signal/Intersection Improvements
1.0.021 Public Works Maintenance Building
LG022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles
SI001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region *1 ) 30002 Coastal And Boise Chloe Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) 80003 Slater Channel Region (SD Region *3)
80004 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region #4)
30005 Boise Chice Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region 45) S0006 Public Works Maintenance Building
Pi:001 Expand Banning Branch Library
PL-002 Expand Main Street Branch Library
PL-003 Expand Library Collection Items
PK001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan And EIR
PK002 Irby Park Phase II
PK003 Central Park Former Gun Range SIR, RAP And Development P14004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan And Development Plan P14005 Blufilop Park Trail Improvements
P14005 Edinger Dock Development
P14007 VVardlow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construction PK008 City- Wide Parks Master Plan
PRO9 Central Park Habitat Plan
Total Thru
D.P. QuilcK)ut
$500,000
$264,000
$8,800
$10,000000
$5,000,000
$2,820,000
$65,000
$23,728,000
$21,527,000
$34,236,000
$28,749,000
$98,549,000
$705,050
$5,258,470
$1,651,375
$921,524
$5,400,000
$500,000
$4,325,000
$1,450,000
$1,000,000
$700,000
$1,000,000
$350,000
$250,000
2 V: 1.33.0 Date: 5/02/2012 Time: 10:55 AM Huntington Beach October, 2011 Pape; 2 HB -241- Item 9. -106
176
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Master Project List
Total Thru
GP. Build-Out
PK010 Central Park Acquisiton Of Encyclopedia Lots $1,020,000 PK011 Central Park Development Of Remaining $6 Acres $20,000,000 P14012 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities $800,000 P14013 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants $4,500,000 PK014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase II $2,500,000
P14015 Beach Playground $350,000
P14016 Central Park Development Of Former Gun Range Area $3,000,000 PK017 Warner Dock Renovation And Expansion $800,000
P1018 Lamb Park Design And Development $1,100,000
P14019 Central Park Sports Complex Teem Room $100,000
P14020 Future Parks Acquisition (Possible Closed School Sites) $59,588,000 P14021 Central Park Senior Center $22,000,000
P14022 Edison Community Center Gymnasium $2,975,000
P14023 Murdy Community Center Gymnasium $2,975,000
P14024 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion $800,000
Total All Projects s4039p,0s5
V: 1.33,0 Data: 5102/2012
Tim: 11;01 AM Huntington Beach October, 2011 Page: 3
Item 9. - 107 HB -242-
177
City of Huntington Beach
Law Enforcement Facilities,
Vehicles and Equipment
4 HB -243- Item 9. -108
178
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment
- 13 2013 - 14 2014-15
2015 - 16
Through
Build Out
Project Build
Out Total
$0 $0 $0 $7,597,165 $7,597,185
$0 $0 $0 $1,751,040 $1,751,040
$0 $0 so $327,690 $327,690
$0 $0 $0 $425,000 $425,000
$0 $0 $0 $10,100,895 $10,100,895
2011 - 12 2012
LE -001 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space $0
LE -002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles $0
LE -003 Acquire Additional Sworn Officer Issued Equipment $0 LE -004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment $0 TOTALS $0
Notes:
1) If project timing Is not a component of this effort, then all projects default to their "Thru Build Our amount Lri
V: 1.12.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:09 PM
Huntington Beach October, 2011 Page: 1
179
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/Title LE 001 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire land (or replacement land is placed at City Hall) for and construct12,041 square feet of law enforcement space. The department will need to hire an additional 33 sworn officers at General Ran build-out to accommodate the additional 146% (8,697) in calls-for-service demand overthe current 59,479 annual calls-for-service. Roughly 249 of these would be to the beach area. The additional space could be in the main station or could be located elsewhere in the City. The space would be necessary to expand, patrol, investigation, traffic control or any of the many specialty support services such as communications or records, Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The City annually currently experiences roughly approximately 61285 calls-for-sevice, 97.05% of which are from privately-held properties within the City's limits. The land-use database indicates the addition of 7,065 residential dwellings, 1,353 commercial lodging rooms and 7.3 million square feet of additional business (commercial, office and industrial) space which will generate, on average, an additional 8,418 annual calls-for-service, or a 146% increase. While the existing station is adequate to meet the current needs, the addition of 34 sworn officers will generate the need for a proportionally greater amount of space.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The project primarily addresses additional calls-for-service from new development (97.05%) and thus is allocated 97.05% to new General Plan development
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 97.05%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project timing would be dependent upon both the rate of development and collection of Development Impact Fees.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 -12
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2012-13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2013 - 14
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2014 - 15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2015- 16
through Build-out
568,524.00
1,033,801.00
5,173,493.00
309,604.00
511,743.00
7,597,165.00
Total all Years
568,524.00
1,033,801.00
5,173,493.00
309,604.00
611,743.00
7,597,165.00
6 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:09 PM HB -245- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 110 180
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/Title LE 002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire thirty-two additional response or specialty vehicles at an average cost of $54,720 each in order to maintain the eAsting ratio of 0.98 vehicles per officer. Approximately 97,05% of these vehicles are required to serve private sector development Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The Department currently has 231 law enforcement vehicles that are used by the 235 sworn officers creating an existing standard of 0.98 vehicles per sworn officer. With that the addition of 33 officers needed to respond to the annual calls-for-service likelyyo be generated by future General Plan development the Citywill need to acquire and additional 32 vehicles in order to maintain the 0.98 ratio of vehicle per sworn officer. Failure to maintain the current ratio of vehciets per officer could reduce the City's ability to maintain beat strength and would certainly accelerate vehilce turnover.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The acquisition addresses only the future additional calls-for-service from General Plan new development and thus is allocated 97.05 percent to new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 97.05%
Reference Document
' Project Timing:
The project timing would be dependent upon both the rate of development and collection of Development Impact Fees.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 -12
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2012 - 13
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2013- 14
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2014 - 15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2015 - 16
through Build-out
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
1,751,040.00
1,751,040.00
Total all Years
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
1,751,040.00
1,751,040.00
7 Item 9. - 111 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:09 PM MB -246- Huntington Beach October. 2011 181
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/ Title LE 003 Acquire Additional Sworn Officer Issued Equipment Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire additional equipment assigned to the additional 33 sworn officers necessary to accommodate General Plan development. The capitalized list of equipment includes (but is not limited to): a protective vest handgun, baton, compliment of leathers, handcuffs, uniforms, helmet raincoat and heavy duty flashlight The costs, at $9,930 includes a nominal background chack, medical/physical check and polygraph exam for the sucessful candidates.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The equipment is necessary for an officer to function in the field. The list is mostly safely equipment but also includes the costs absorbed by the City in the necessary for identifying an appropriate candidate. Roughly 97.05% of the required new officers would be required to serve new General Plan development
Relationship to General Plan Development
The project primarily addresses additional calls-for-service from new development (97.05%) and thus is allocated 97.05% to new General Plan development
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 97.05%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project timing would be dependent upon both development and collection of development impactfees. 2015 - 16
- 15 through Build-out Total all Years
0.00 0,00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0,00 327,690.00 327,690.00
0.00 327,690.00 327,690.00
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014
1. Design I Engineering / Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00
5. Equipment / Other 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/2712012 Time: 12:09 PM HB -247- Huntington Beach I Item 9. - 112 182
2015 - 16
through Build-out
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
425,000.00
425,000.00
Total all Years
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
425,000.00
426,000.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/ Title LE 004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire specialty equipment to support the additional 33 officers needed to accommodate new development Approximately 97% of that figure are needed to accommodate new development of private property.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The amount and type of crime is ever increasing. The City will need to acquire additional information-sharing computer capacity as well as specialty equipment such as bikes, dogs, hand-held radios, etc.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The project primarily addresses additional cells-for-service from new development (97.05%) and thus is allocated 97.05% to new General Plan development
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 97.05%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project timing would be dependent upon both development and collection of development impact fees.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14
2034 - 15
1. Design / Engineering / Aclministratic 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 4. Contingency 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 5. Equipment / Other 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 TOTAL COST: 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 9
Item 9. - 113 Date: 4/2712012 Time: 12:09 PM Huntington Beach October, 2011 HB -248-
183
184
S I I - .6 u-I31-I
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment 2015- 16
Through Project Build
2011 - 12 2012-13
2013 - 14 2014 - 15 Build Out Out Total
FS -001 Relocate Fire Station #8 (Heil)
FS -002 Construct Station #8 (Heil) Apparatus Storage Facility FS -003 Construct A Single Bay/Quarters At Station #4 (Magnolia) FS -004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station #4 (Magnolia) FS -005 Acquire An Addition Engine For Station #1 (Gothard) FS -006 Acquire An Addition Engine For Station #2 (Murdy) $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0 $7,169,470
$0 $0 $1,716,044
$0 $0 $1,266,458
$0 $0 $740,000
$0 $0 $525,000
$0 $0 $525,000
$7,169,470
$1,718,044
$1,286,458
$740,000
$525,000
$525,000
TOTALS
$0
$0
$0 $0 $11,941,972 $11,941,972
Notes:
1) if project timing is not a component of this effort, then all projects default to their "Thru Build Our amount V:1.12.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:13 PM Huntington Beach October, 2011 Page: 1 185
2015 - 16
2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years 532,561.00
1,026,097.00
4,963,827.00
285,204.00
361,781.00
7,169,470.00
532,561.00
1,026,097.00
4,963,827.00
285,204.00
361,781.00
7,169,470.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/Title FS 001 Relocate Fire Station #8 (Heil) Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Relocate Station #8 from its current location on Heil Avenue just west of Spring ale Street to a more northerly area near Graham Street just north of Edinger Street The proposed 11,350 square foot facility would be a be a five vehicle configuration and would require roughly 1.25 acres. The facility would be capable of housing up to three companies and battalion chief. The facility would provide 3,550 square feet of vehicle bay space. 1,290 square feet of mechanical/technical space, 6,150 square feet of living quarters consisting of (a maximum of 24) bunks, lockers, restrooms/showers, a physical training room, kitchen, dining and a dayroom.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The forty-five year-old station, once state-of-the-art has numerous limitations in addition to mere aging. In addition to asbestos removal needs, the station design does not allow for mixed gender accommodation or the assignment of an aerial response truck. Since the station needs to be reconstructed, relocation more northerly, about 1.25 miles, would improve the first-in engine, truck and paramedic ALS response capacityto that area of the City. Redevelopment along the Edinger/Beach corridorwill likely result in a greater number of calls-for-service changing the response dynamic of the existing eight stations. ff the station were not relocated, the area in question would receive longer response times.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Relocating Station #8 (Heil) is consistent with the City's General Plan Public Safety response time commitments and would improve the average engine, aerial truck and ALS paramedic response time through-out the City, in particular the Edinger/Beach corridor area_ Allocation To General Plan Buildout 50.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The redevelopment along the Edinger/Beach corridor would likely be the trigger pointfor the need orf this relocation. The station age and limitations are also an issue end could trigger the construction timing.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratk
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
12 Time:12:13 PM FI B -251- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 116 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 186
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/ Title FS 002 Construct Station #8 (Heil) Apparatus Storage Facility Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Construct a 1620 square foot reserve apparatus storage facility upon relocation of the extisting Station #6 (Heil) to its proposed future location.
The facility would consist of a 2,660 square foot two bays wide by two vehicle deep storage building for up to four reserve response vehicles.
There would also be a contiguous 960 square foot basic storage room. The facility would be constructed on the rear portion of the parcel near the hose tower and hose storage building.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The proposed storage building is necessary for proper storage of the reserve vehicles and other specialty equipment not used on a routine basis, but important none-the-less. The existing vehicle storage facility cannot store all of the reservse vehciels thatwill be needed at General Plan build-out
Relationship to General Plan Development
The additional storage sapce is necessary, in part to new deveopment and also because of the limited capaciaty of the single existing reserve vehicle storage facility.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 25.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The facility would likely be constructed at the same time as the proposed relocation of station *8 (Heil), however, the construction could be completed eta different time.
2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 -14 2014- 15 through Bad-out Total tgl Years
1. Design 1 Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 000
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
120,415.00
327,286.00
1,122,703.00
84,210.00
81,450.00
1,716,044.00
120,415.00
327,266.00
1,122,703.00
64,210.00
81,450,00
1,716,044.00
13 Item 9. - 117 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:13 PM HB -252- Huntington Beech October, 2011 187
2015- 16
2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
109,650.00
0.00 1,020,000.00
60,306.00
76,500.00
1,266,458.00
109,650,00
0.00 1,020,000.00
60,308.00
76,500.00
1,268,458,90
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles An d Equipment Project Number/ Title FS 003 Construct A Single Bay/Quarters At Station *4 (Magnolia) Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Construct a 2,400 square foot addition to Station *4 (Magnolia). The plans consist of an additional bay and sufficient living quarters/training/storage space to the existing two-bay Station *4 (Magnolia). The additional 1,400 square foot vehicle bay would allowfor two additonal response vehicles, in this case an engine and an ambulance. The 1,000 square foot living quarters expansion would increase storage/locker space by approximately 200 square feet and living/training space by approximately 800 square feet Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The expanded facility will be needed to accommodate the additional calls-for-servce demands from the planned density-inceasing redevelopment from the Downtown Specific Plan and along the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor. Increased call-load must be balanced by have adequate fire station quarters and apparatus in order to meet the City's General Flan emergency response goals. Without the additional facilities, the response goals will be unachievable with the greater demands.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities resulting from development consistebtwith the Downtown Specific Plan and the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor as well for multiple response vehicle demands to other parts of the City.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 50.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impact tee receipts and other revenues become available.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
2011 -12 2012 -13 2013- 14
1. Design / Engineering / Administrate 0.00
0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way 0.00
0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00
0.00 0.00
4. Contingency 0.00
0.00 0.00
5. Equipment / Other 0.00
0.00 0,00
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00 0.00
14 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/2712012 Time: 12:13 PM HB -253- Huntington each Item 9. - 118 188
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/Title FS 004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station PI (Magnolia) Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Add an engine company and an ambulance to Station #4 (Magnolia). Project FD-003 details the proposed 2,400 square loot expansion required to house the new enine and paramedic vehicle and staff.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
Increased call-toad must be balanced by have adequate fire station quarters and apparatus in order to meet the City's General Plan emergency response goals. Without the additional facilities, the response goals will be unachievable with the greater demands. The expanded facility will be needed to accommodate the additional calls-for-servce demands from the planned density-inceasing redevelopment from the Downtown Specific Plan and along the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities resulting from development consistebt with the Downtown Specific Plan and the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor as well for multiple response vehicle demands to other parts of the City.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 50.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impact fee receipts and other revenues become available.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
2011 -12
2012-13
2013 - 14
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
0,00
0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
0,00
0.00 0.00
3. Construction
0.00 0.00
0.00 4. Contingency
0.00 0,00
0.00 5. Equipment / Other
0.00 0.00
0.00 TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 2015 - 16
2014 - 35 through Buad•out
Total all Years
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 740,000.00
740,000.00
0.00 740,000.00
740,000.00
15 Item 9. - 119 Date: 412712012 Time:12:13 PM HB -254- Huntington Beach October, 21111 189
2015 - 16
2014 - 15 through Build-out Total aS Years
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number./Title FS 005 Acquire An Addition Engine For Station #1 (Gothard) Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Ad a standard engine company at Station #1 (Gothard). The engine would be fully stocked with and appropriate and sufficient amount of hose, appurtenances end other safety/rescue equipment.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The expanded fadlity will be needed to accommodate the additional calls-for-seivce demands from the planned density-inceasing redevelopment from the Downtown Specific Plan and along the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor. Increased call-load must be balanced by have adequate fire station quarters and apparatus in order to meet the City's General Plan emergency response goals. Without the additional facilities, the response goals will be unachievable with the greater demands.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities resulting from development consistel3t with the Downtown Specific Plan and the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor as well for multiple response vehicles response to other parts of the City.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 50.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impact fee receipts and other revenues become available.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic 0.00
0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way 0.00
0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00
0.00 0.00
4. Contingency 0.00
0.00 0.00
5. Equipment! Other 0.00
0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00
0.00 0.00
16 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:13 PM
HB -255-
Huntington Beach Item
9. - 120
190
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment Project Number/ Title FS 006 Acquire An Addition Engine For Station #2 (Murdy) Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Add a standard engine comperry at Station #2 (Murdy). The engine would be fully stocked with an appropriate and sufficient emiouint of hose, appurtenances and other safety/rescue equipment
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The expended facility will be needed to arrommodate the additional calls-for-servce demands from the planned density-inceasing redevelopment along the Edinger/Beach Specifc Plan corridor. Increased call-load must be balanced by have adequate fire station quarters and apparatus in order to meet the City's General Plan emergency response goals. Without the additional facilities, the response goals will be unachievable with the greater demands.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities along Edison/Beach Specific Plan and multiple response vehicles demands to other parts of the City.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 50.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impact fee receipts end other revenues become available. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 .12 2012 - 13
2013 - 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.09
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
525,000.00
525,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
525,000,00
525,000.00
17 Item 9. - 121 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:13 PM HB -256- Huntington Beach October, 2011 191
City of Huntington Beach
Circulation (Streets, Signals
And Bridges) System
18 HB -257- Item 9. -122
192
$0
$0
$O
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
EZI - .6 moll Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System 2011 - 12 2012 - 15 2013 - 14 2014-15
2015 - 16
Through Project Build
Build Out Out Total
LC -001
LC -002
LC -003
LC -004
LC -005
LC -006
LC -007
LC -008
LC -009
LC -010
LC -011
LC -012
LC -013
LC -014
LC -015
LC -018
LC -017
LC -018
LC -019
LC -020
LC -021
LC -022
Beach Boulevard And Edinger Avenue
Beach Boulevard And Heil Avenue
Beach Boulevard And Warner Avenue
Beach Boulevard And Slater Avenue
Beach Boulevard And Talbert Avenue
Beach Boulevard And Garfield Avenue
Beach Boulevard And Yorktown Avenue
Pacific Coast Highway And Warner Avenue
Pacific Coast Highway And Goldenwest Street
Pacific Coast Highway And Brookhurst Street
Goldenwest Street And Boise Avenue
Goldenwest Street And Slater Street
Newland Street And Talbert Avenue
Newland Street And Warner Avenue
Newland Street And Yorktown Avenue
Gothard Street And Slater Avenue
Gothard Street And Talbert Avenue
Ward Street And Garfield Avenue
Brookhurst Street And Adams Avenue
Miscellaneous Traffic Signal/Intersection improvements
Public Works Maintenance Building
Public Works Maintenance Vehicles
$0 $600,000
$0 $1,000,000
$0 $400,000
$0 $500,000
50 $1,000,000
$0 $1,000,000
$0 $500,000
$0 $2,000,000
$0 $750,000
$0 $750,000
$0 $500,000
$0 $50,000
$0 $500,000
$0 $30,000
$0 $300,000
$0 $500,000
$0 $264,000
$0 $8,800
$0 $10,000,000
$0 $5,000,000
$0 $2,820,000
$0 $65,000
$600,000
$1,000,000
$400,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$2,000,000
$750,000
$750,000
$500,000
$50,000
$500,000
$30,000
$300,000
$500,000
$264,000
$8,800
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$2,820,000
$65,000
:8
V: 1.12.0 Date: 4/27/2012
Time: 12:14 PM Huntington Beach October, 2011 Page: 1 193
Huntin In Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System TOTALS
Notes:
1) If project timing is not a component of this effort, then all projects default to their "That Build Out" amount 2015 - 16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 Build Out Out Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $28,537,800 $28,537,800
17ZI - .6 11131I
V: 1.12.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:14 PM
Huntington Beach October, 2011 Page: 2
194
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System Project Number/ Tile LC (101 Beach Boulevard And Edinger Avenue Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection (in all directions), the following improvements to the intersection are proposed: 1) Add elth northbound through lane, and 2) Add a 3rd westbound through lane. Beach Boulevard, being a State Highway, makes this a CALTRANS managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City, the estimated cost consists of the entire project cost but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City, thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Seivice (or LOS) traffic flow at intersections of major streets to a Level "E" by acting as a bottleneck. Level SE" is "Unstable Flow:" and is identified as long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level "E", 'Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement'.
Relationship to General Plan Development
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City, making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to unacceptable levels like "D", "E" or 'P. Development anticipated over the next twenty years will generate 454,512 additional daily trip-miles.
This is al4.6% increase daily over the City's existing demand of 3,107,224 daily trip-miles, all of which will compete for use of a static number of major roadway lane miles.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 75.00%
Reference Document
ProjectTiming:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / AdminIstratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 - 12
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2012 -13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2013 - 14
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2014 - 15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2015 - 16
through Build-out
0.00 0.00
600,000.00
0.00 0.00
600,000.00
Total alt Years
0.00 0.00
600,00000
0.00 0.00
600,000.00
21 Item 9. - 125 Date: 4/2712012
Time: 12:14 PM HB -260- Huntington Beach October, 2011 195
2015 - 16
2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
0.00 0.00
1,000,000.00
0.00 0.00
1,000,000.00
0.00 0.00
1,000,000.00
0.00 0.00
1,000,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System Project Number/Title LC 002 Beech Boulevard And Heil Avenue Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection (in all directions), the following improvements to the intersection are proposed: 1) Add 2nd northbound left-fium lane. An alternative would be to construct: 1)A de-facto westbound right turn lane, and 2) add a de-facto southbound right turn lane. Beach Boulevard, being a State Highway, makes this a CALTRANS managed project.
Since the projectwould not be managed bythe City, the estimated cost consists of the entire project cost but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City, thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity Wnere warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (or LOS) traffic flow at intersections of major streets to a Level "Eu by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is 'Unstable Flow." and is identified as along queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level "E", "Forced Flow' creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement'.
Relationship to General Plan Development
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City, making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to unacceptable levels like "D", "E" or "F'. Development entidpated over the next twenty years will generate 454,542 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 14.6% increase daily overthe City's existing demand of 3,107.224 daily trip-miles, all of which will compete for use of a static number of major roadway lane miles. The 454,542 added deity tip-miles represent 12.8% of the total 3,561,767 daily trip-miles att.* twenty-year development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
22 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:14 PM HB -261- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 126 196
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System Project Number/ Title LC 003 Beach Boulevard And Warner Avenue Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection (in all directions), the follcrwing improvements to the intersection are proposed:1) Add a separate westbound right turn lane. An alternative would be to construct the following: 1) A de-facto westbound right turn lane, and 2) add a separate northbound right turn lane. Beach Boulevard, being a State Highway, makes this a C.ALTRANS managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City the estimated cost consists of the entire project cost but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City, thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (or LOS) traffic flow at intersections of major streets to a Level "E" by acting as a bottleneck Level "E" is 'Unstable Flow." and is identified as 'long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level "E', "Forced Flow' creates 'Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City, making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to unacceptable levels like "D°, "E" or "F". Development anticipated over the next twenty years will generate 454542 additional dailytrip-miles.
This is a 14.6% increase daily over the City's existing demand of 3,107,22.1 daily hip-miles, all of which will compete for use of a static number of major roadway lane miles. The 454542 added daily trip-miles represent 12.8% of the total 3,561367 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 65.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12
2012 - 13
2013 - 14
2014 - 15
through Build-out Total all Years
t Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment I Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 400.000.00
0.00 0,00
400,000.00
0.00 0.00
400,000.00
0.00 0.00
400,000.00
23 Item 9. - 127 Date: 412712012 Time: 12:14 PM
HB -262- Huntington Beach October, 2011
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Loce1 Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System Project Number/ Title LC 017 Gothard Street And Talbert Avenue Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection (in all directions), the following improvement to the intersection is proposed: 1) Add a 2nd southbound left turn lane. An alternative to that improvement would be: 1) Convert a separate eastbound right turn to a 2nd eastbound through lane. This would be a City-managed project.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City, thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (or LOS) traffic flow at intersections of major streets to a Level "E" by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is °Unstable Flow." and is identified as 'long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level E. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City, making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to unacceptable levels like "D", "E" or "F. Development anticipated over the next twenty years will generate 454,542 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 14.6% increase daily over the City's existing demand of 3,107,224 daily trip-miles, all of which will compete for use of a static number of major roadway lane miles. The 454,542 added dailytrip-miles represent 12.8% of the total 3,561,767 daily trip-miles atthe twenty-year development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities end as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012-13 2013 -14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment! Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 240,000.00
24,000.00
0.00 264,000.00
0.00 240,000.00
24,000.00
0.00 264,004.00
37 Item 9. - 14 1 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:14 PM Huntington Beach October, 21111 HB -276-
211
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation (Streets. Signals And Bridges) System Project Number/ Title LC 018 Ward Street And Garfield Avenue Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection (in all directions), the following improvements to the intersection are proposed: 1) Add a 2nd eastbound left turn lane, and 2) remove a separate eastbound right turn lane. This would be a City-managed project.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City, thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (or LOS) traffic flow at intersections of major streets to a Level "E" by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow:" and is identified as long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection'. Level "E", 'Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City, making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to unacceptable levels like ND", "E" or "F". Development anticipated over the next twenty years will generate 454542 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 14.6% increase daily over the City's existing demand of 3,107,224 daily trip-miles, all of which will compete for use of a static number of major roadway lane miles. The 454542 added daily trip-miles represent 12.8% of the total 3,561,767 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
8,000.00
800.00
0.00 8,800.00
0.00 8,000.00
800.00
0.00 8,800.00
38 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time:12:14 PM HB -277- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 142 212
213
214
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System Project Number/Title LC 021 Public Works Maintenance Building Submitting Departments: Public Works -Engineering
Project Description:
Construct a 10,000 square foot split-face block, general-use circulation system maintenance building. The facility would have full utilities and a number of roll-up doors. Approximately 80% of the cost of the additional space would benefit circulation system maintenance. The remaining 20% would be required for the growing storm drainage collection system maintenance needs and would thus be financed with Strom Drainage System Development Impact Fee proceeds. The cot below represents 80% of the proposed facility costs.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The additional space needs is required tro support the roughly $40.0 million in additional equipment and supply space needs resulting from the addition of major circulation and strom drainage improvements as well as an untold amount of local street miles and local strom drainage lines.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The facility expansion is limited to the demand created by the new infrastructure required to support new development Allocation To Genera/ Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document
ProjectTiming:
The project would be constructed based upon normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient DIF revenues are collected. 2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012-13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Tom! all Years 1, Design / Engineering / Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 265,000.00 265,000.00
2. Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 am 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 rim 0.00 2,410,000.00 2,410,000.00
4. Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.5,000.00 145,000.00
5. Equipment! Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,820,00E1.00 2,820,000.00 41 Item 9. - 145 Date: 4/2712012
Time: 12:14 PM HB -280- Huntington Beach October, 2011 215
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System Project Number./ Title LC 022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles Submitting Departments: Public Works -Maintenance
Project Description:
Acquire an additional maintenance utility truck and a traffic signal lift truck.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The additional maintenance vehicle would be required to support the additional demands from the roughly $40.0 million in additional circulation system improvements.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The circulation system maintenance fleet expansion is limited to the demands created by new infrastructure required to support new development
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The proposed afleet additions would be acquired based upon normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient or revenues are collected.
2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
05,000.00
65,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
55,000.00
65,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 42
V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012
Time: 12:14 PM HB -281- Huntington Beech Item 9. - 146 216
217
Huntin, in Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Storm Drainage Collection System
2015- 16
Through Project Build
2011-12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total SD -001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region #1) $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,728,000 $23,728,000
SD -002 Coastal And Balsa Chios Wetlands Region (SO Region #2) SD -003 Slater Channel Region (SD Region #3)
SD -004 VVintersburg Channel Region (SD Region #4)
SD -005 Balsa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region #5) SD -006 Public Works Maintenance Building
$0 $0 $0 $0 $21,527,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $34,236,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $28,749,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $98,549,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $705,050
$21,527,000
$34,236,000
$28,749,000
$96,549,000
$705,050
TOTALS
$0 $0 $0 $0 $207494,050 $207494,050
Notes:
1) If project timing is not a component of this effort then all projects default to their ''Thru Build Out" amount 8171 - .6 moll
V: 1.12.0 Date: 4127/2012
Time: 12:15 PM
Huntington Beach October, 2011 Page: 1
218
2015-16
2011 -12 2012 -13 2013-14 2014 -15 through Build-out Total all Years 2,847,360.00
0.00 18,982,400.00
1,1398,240.00
0.00 23,728,000.00
2,847,360.00
0.00 18,982,400.00
1,898,240.00
0.00 23,728,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number? Title SD 001 Santa Ana River 8, Talbert Channel Region (SD Region #1) Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
The 788 individual projects within Area lare required to remove storm drainage water from the City's street surfaces and other public areas and safely conveying it to the proper outlet. Sub-drainage region #1 drains the lower central to east and southerly areas of the City. It is generally bordered on the east by the Santa Ana River Channel, on the southwest by the Pacific Coast Highway and the Pacific Ocean, on the west mainly by Alabama and Main Streets, and on the north by Garfield and Ellis Avenues. It encompasses the Santa Ana River and the Talbert Channel Water Quality Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 20-2729-32, 40, and 41.
Justification! Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets, roads and other public areas. Storm water will increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed, there would be the potential for flooding of downstream creeks, washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehide response by the City's Police, Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects, vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system. is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 7.52%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition I Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
45 Item 9. - 149
1 Date: 4/27/2012
Time: 12:16 PM HB -284- Huntington Beech October, 2011 219
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number/Title SD 002 Coastal And Eloise Chica Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
The 235 projects within Area #2 are required to remove storm drainage water from the City's street surfaces and other public areas and safely convey it to the proper outlet Sub-drainage region #2 drains the central southwest area of the City. and is generally bordered by Lake and Main Streets on the east Pacific Coast Highway on the south and west Seapoint Avenue and Edwards Street on the west and Ellis Avenue on the north. Sub-drainage 2 also includes the community surrounding the Springdale/Talbert intersection. It encompasses the Boise. ChiCa.
Wetlands and the Coastal Water Quality Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 15-19.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets, roads and other public areas. Storm water will increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed, there would be the potential for flooding of downstream creeks, washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response by the City's Police, Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects, vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system, is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 7.52%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected. 2015 - 15
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14
2014 - 15 Omagh Build-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition! Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
2,583,240.00
0.00 17,221,600.00
1,722,160.00
0.00 21,527,000.00
2,583,240.00
0.00 17,221,600.00
1,722,160.00
0.00 21,527,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
46 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:16 PM
HE -285-
Huntington Beach Item 9 _150
220
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number/Title SD 003 Slater Channel Region (SD Region *3) Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
The 270 projects within Area #3 are required to remove storm drainage water from the City's street surfaces and other public areas and safely convey it to the proper outlet Sub-drainage region 3 drains the central section of the City, including a portion of the City of Fountain Valley, and is generally bordered by Newland and Magnolia Avenues on the east Ellis. Taylor and Talbert Avenues on the south. Graham and Balsa Chloe Streets on the west and Warner Avenue on the north. Sub-drainage 3 consists of the Slater Channel Water Quality Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 10-15.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets, roads and other public areas. Storm water will increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. if not completed, there would be the potential for flooding of downstream creeks, washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response by the City's Police, Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects, vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system, is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 7.52%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities end as adequate end sufficient revenues are collected.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 -12
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2012 - 13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2013 - 14
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2014 - 15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2015 - 16
through Build-out
4,108,320.00
0.00 27,388,800.00
2,738,880.00
0.00 34,236,000.00
Total all Years
4,108,320.00
0_00
27,388,800.00
2,738,880.00
0.00 34,236,000.00
47 Item 9. - 151
1 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:16 PM HB -286-
Huntington Beach October, 2011
221
2015 - 16
2011 -12 2012 • 13 2013- 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years 3,449,880.00
0.00 22,999,200.00
2,299,920.00
0.00 28,749,000.00
3,449,880.00
0.00 22,999,200.00
2,299,920.00
0.00 28,749,000.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.09 0.00
0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number/ Title SD 004 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region *4) Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
The 220 projects within Area #4 are required to remove storm drainage water from the City's street surfaces and other public areas and safely convey it to the proper outlet.Sub-drainage region 4 includes the northern end northeastern parts of the City. and is generally bordered by Newland Street on the east Heil and Warner Avenues on the south, Springdale Street on the west and McFadden Avenue on the north.
Sub-drainage 4 corresponds to the Wintersburg Water Quality Channel Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 6-9.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets, roads and other public areas. Storm water will increase in amounts proportional to the amount of imperious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.530 for commercial properties. If not completed, there would be the potential for flooding of downstream creeks, washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response by the City's Police, Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects, vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system, is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 7.52%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment! Other
TOTAL COST:
48 V: 1.05.0 Date: 4/27/2012
Time: 12:16 PM HB -287- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 152 222
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number/ Title SD 005 Boise Chica Channel a Harbour Region (SD Region #5) Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
The 279 projects within Area #5 are required to remove storm drainage water from the aty's street surfaces and other public areas and safely convey ill° the proper outlet Sub-drainage region 5 covers the northwestern section of the City, including a portion of the City of Westminster.
Bub-drainage 5 corresponds to the Harbor Water Quality Planning Area and the Boise Chico. Channel Water Quality Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 1-5.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets, roads and other public areas. Storm water wi II increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed, there would be the potential forflooding of downstream creeks, washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response by the City's Police. Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects, vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system, is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 7.52%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate end sufficient revenues are collected.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 -12
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 2012 - 13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2013 -14
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2014 -15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2015 - 16
through Build-out
11,825,880.00
0.00 78,839,200.00
7,883,920.00
0.00 98,549,000.00
Total all Years
11,825,880.00
0.00 78,839,200.00
7,883,920.00
0.00 98,549,000.00
49 Item 9. - 153
, Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:16 PM HB -288- Huntington Beach October, 2011 223
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number/ Title SD 006 Public Works Maintenance Building Submitting Departments: Public Works - Engineering
Project Description:
.Construct a 10,000 split-face block general use, maintenance building. The facility would be have lull utilities and a number of roll-up doors.
Approdmately 20% of the cost of an additional 10,000 square foot building in support of General Fund Public Works maintenance from Storm Drainage System Development Impact Fees. The remaining 00% would be financed with Circuation System Development Impact Fees.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The additional space needs would be required to supportthe additional demands from the construction of $ }c>>0.0‹ in circulation and storm drainage infrastructure improvements.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The facility expansion is limited to the demands created by the new infrastructure required to support new development Allocation To General Plan Buildout 100.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected. 2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
2011 -12 2012-13
2013 -14
2014 - 15
through Berld-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering / Administratit
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
66,250.00
0.00 602,500.00
36,300.00
0,00
705,050.00
66,250,00
0.00 602,500.00
36,300.00
0.00 705,050.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
50 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4127/2012 Time: 12:16 PM FIB -289- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 154 224
City of Huntington Beach
Public Library Facilities
And Collection
51 HB -290-
225
Huntin )n Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Public Library Facilities And Collection
2015 - 16
Through Project Build
2011 - 12 2012 - 13
2013 - 14 2014 - 15 Build Out Out Total
PL -001 Expand Banning Branch Library $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,288,470 $5,268,470 PL -002 Expand Main Street Branch Library $0
$0
$9 $0 $1,651,375 $1,551,375
PL -003 Expand Library Collection System $0
$0 $0
$0
$921,524
$921,524
TOTALS
$0 $0 $0 $0 $7,841,369 $7,841,369
Notes:
1) If project timing is not a component of this effort, then all projects default to their "Thru Build Out" amount 9C I - .6 uml-I
tr,
t\.)
V: 1.12.0 Date: 4/27/2012
Time: 12:16 PM
Huntington Beach October, 2011 Page: 1
226
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Public Library Facilities And Collection Project Number/Title PL 001 Expand Banning Branch Library Submitting Departments: Library Services
Project Description:
Expand the Banning Branch Library facilities by 10,100 square feet from the current 2,400 square feet to 12,500 square feet to assit in maintain the existing levels of service and extend those same levels of service to the 17,089 new residents expected to be added through General Plan build-out.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The current defacto library standard of space is 0.669 square feet per resident Added 17,089 residents from new General Plan development will create additional demands upon the existing level of service provided by the library. Without increasing library space, the existing standard would decrease to about 0.614 square feet per resident.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The proposed improvements are required to meet the demands of an increasing residential population.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 100.08%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
Based upon the rate of construction of residential units and thus collection of any imposed development Impact Fees. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 -14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design f Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 9.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
535,260.00
808,000.00
3,568,370.00
356,840.00
0.00 5,268,470.00
535,260.00
808,000.00
3,568,370.00
356,840.00
0.00 5,268,470.00
53 Item 9. - 157 1 Date: 4/27/2012
Time: 12:17 PM HB -292- Huntington Beach October, 2011 227
2015 - 16
2011 -12 2012-13 2013- 14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years 158,165.00
0.00 1,321,100.00
132,110.00
0.00 1,651,375.00
198,165.00
0.00 1,321,100.00
132,110.00
0.00 1,651,375.00
0.00 0,90
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Public Library Facilities And Collection Project Number/Title PL 002 Expand Main Street Branch Library Submitting Departments: Library Services
Project Description:
Expand the Main Street Branch Library facilities by 4,804 square feet from the current 4,500 square feet to 9,304 square feet to assist in the maintenance of the existing levels of service and extend those same levels of service to the 17,089 new residents expected to be added through General Plan build-out The project consists taking 4,804 square feet of the current building that house the branch library currently used by a non-City tenant and turning it into library space. There is no current effort to oust the current tenant however, ultimately the non-library space could easily be converted as librray space.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The current defacto library standard of space is 0.669 square feet per resident Added 17,089 residents from new General Plan development will create additional demands upon the existing level of service provided by the library. Without increasing library space, the existing standard would decrease to about 0.614 square feet per resident Relationship to General Plan Development
The proposed improvements are required to meet the demands of en increasing residential population.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 100.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Based upon the rate of construction of residential units and thus collection of any imposed development Impact Fees.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment! Other
TOTAL COST:
54 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:17 PM HB
hluntington Beach Item 9. - 158
228
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
infrastructure: Public Library Facilities And Collection Project Number/Title PL 003 Expand Library Collection System Submitting Departments: Library Services
Project Description:
Expand the public library collection items inventory by roughly 36,861 items to maintain the existing 2.157 collection items per resident currently offered bythe City's library system.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
Added population from new residential construction will increase the City's residential population by approximately 17,089 additional residents. Without expanding the library collection items inventory, that standard would drop to approximately 1.979 items per resident.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The proposed improvements are required to meet the demands of an increasing residential population.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 100.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Based upon the rate of construction of residential units and thus collection of any imposed development Impact Fees. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012-13 2013 - 14 2014 -15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering /Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3, Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
921,524.00
921,524.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
921,024.00
921,024,00
55 Item 9. - 159 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 12:17 PM HB -294- Huntington Beach October, 2011 229
City of Huntington Beach
Park Land Acquisition and
Park Facilities Development
56 HB -295- Item 9.- 160
230
I9
T - '6
m
oll
• Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
2015- 16
TihrOUgil Project El uitd
2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - IS ROM Out Cut Tote/ PK 4301
PK -002
PK -003
PM -004
PK -005
PK -0013
'K-007
PK -008
PM -000
PK -014
PK-011
PM -012
PK -013
PM -014
PK-015
PK -016
PK -017
Pt(-t118
PK-010
PM -020
PK -Mt
PM -622
Ballelt Park Conceptual Plan And EIR
Irby Park Phasell
Central Part Farmer Gun Range EIR, RAPAnd Development
Le Bard Perk Expansion Master Plan And Development plan iltufttop Park Trail Improvements
Edinger Occir Development
Wardlcnv Field Reamfiguraticn Deaign/Construction
City-Wide Parks Master Plan
Central Parkl-raoltat Plan
Central Park Acquisitcn Of Encyclopedia Lots
Central Perk Development Of Remaining 86 Acres
Cant-al Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Fealltles
General Youth Sports Facilities Grants
Mundy Youth Sports Complex Phase II
Beach Playground
Cenlral park Development 01FG-floor Gun Range Area
Warner DocK Renovation And Expansion
Lau* Park Design And Development
Cenlrai Park Sports Complex Team Room
Future Parks Acquisition [Possible Closed School Sites) Central Park SentorCenter
Etimon Community Canter Gymnasium
5400.0410
$325,000
$250,000
$0
SO
$120,0110
$6
SO
$0
$0
SO
$150,000
SO
50 SO
so
$0
so
$O
$0
SO
so
$O
$0
SO
$0
$O
$0
$0
SO
$150,000
$D
SO
$0
$43
SO "
$o
SO
-$0
$0 $5,000,000
30 5500,000
$G $4,000. ON
$0 $1200,001J
50 $1,000,050
$0 5786,000
50 5800,000
SO 5350,000
$0 41250.000
$0 $1,020,000
526,000,000
30 $800,000
so,oaa 53,500,000
$0 $2;500,000
SO 3350,000
$3,000•000
$0 $800,000
$O 51,100,11011
$0 5100,000
30 559,588,000
$0 $22,000,000
$0 $2.975,000
$5,400,000
$550,000
$4,325,000
$1,450,000
S1,000,000
$700,000
51,000.000
$350,000
5250.000
51.020,000
520,000,000
5800,000
$4,500,006
32,300,000
$350,000
$3,600,000
$800.000
51,100.000
S100,000
$50.5138,000
522,000,000
$2,975,000
$o
SO
$0
$o
SO
50 $0
so
$O
$0
$D
SO
$0
$0
10 V: 1.12.0 Date: 510212012
Time: 11:02 AM
iluntington Dead; October, 2011 Page: 1
231
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
2015- 16
Through Project Buird
2011 - 12 2012-13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 J3uird Out Out Total PK-023 Ittordy Community Canter Gymnasium $0 So $0 30 $2,975,600 $2.075,000 PK -024 Oak View Recreation Cerrteu- Expansion $1 $0 $0 $600,000 $800,000 TOTALS
Notes:
1) IT project timing is not a 0Oreponent of ibis etfOrt, thee an projects default to their -111nu Buitd Our amount $1,245,000 $150,000 5150,1100 $150,000 5135783,000 $137483,003 Z91 - .6 u1Ol-1
Lrz Do
V: 1.12,0 Date: 5/02/2012 11rne: 11:02 Mel 11Unlington Beach October, 2011 Page: 2 232
2015 - 16
2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years 500,000.00
0.00 4,000,000.00
500,000.00
0.00 5,000,000.00
900,000.00
0.00 4,000,000.00
500,000.00
0.00 5,400,000.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/ Tile PK 001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan And EIR Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists of the environmental assessment and conceptual plan for the remaining 28 acre Bartlett Park largely an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA). The preliminary plans include a natural-passive use consisting of trails. trailhead kiosks, and limited, natural parking.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The park improvements are needed for protection of the currently open or vacant parcel. Roughly BO% of the park would remain untouched with improvements designed to protect that 90%.
Relationship to General Plan Development
Utile direct relationship, but the improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The design and environment assessment component is planned for 2009 to 2010. The first construction component is planned for between 2010 and 2020.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 -12
400,090.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 400,000.00
59 Item 9. - 163 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 11:36 AM HB -298- Huntington Beach October, 2011 233
2015 - 16
2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years 50,000.00
0.100
400,000.00
50,000.00
0.00 500,000.00
50,000.00
0.00 400,000.00
50,000.00
0.00 500,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/Title PK 002 Irby Park Phase II
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists of the development of the remaining eight acres. Construct bio-filter and water retention area. In addition, construct trails, passive pocket areas, interpretive signs and a small area of neighborhood park improvements (climbing apparatus, benches, picnic tables) adjacent to the neighborhood area. The more active portion would be designed in a fashion to protect the more natural areas.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The park needs a combination of passive/active improvements to create a balance of active uses with protection of the water retention needs, The water retention needs would receive appropriations from storm drainage sources. a State Public Works Grant.
Relationship to General Plan Development
Little direct relationship, but the improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Binh:lout 0.00%
Reference Document
ProjectTiming:
Based upon receipt of State (Public Works) Grant The project is in conjunction with a PW State Grant- matching funds.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design 1 Engineering / Administratir
2. Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
60 V: 1,08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 11:36 AM HB -299- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 164 234
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/Title PK 003 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR RAP And Development Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists of an Environmental Impact Review, Remedial Action Plan and ultimately a development plan. The gun range has been inactive for overten years and the accumulated lead in the soil and use of creosote wood presents an environmental problem and must be remediated before re-use. Phase I consists of preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Remedial Action Plan. Phase II ($2.0 million) is an estimate of the range remediation. Phase Ill (also $2.0 million) is the actual site improvements to turn it into an active park use, proposed at this time to be a skate park
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The roughly five acre gun range area is part of the City's major regional park and needs to be used to its maximum potential in a yet to be determined manner.
Relationship to General Plan Development
Little direct relationship. but the improvements are consistent witn the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The study/report site remediation and site improvements are planned for a period between 2010 and 2020. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013-14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering! Administratic 325, 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,000.00
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4000,000.00 4,000,000.00
4. Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 325,000.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 4,000,000.00 4,325,000.00 61 Item 9. - 165 Date: 4/2712012 Time:11:36 AM HB -300- Huntington Beach October, 2011 235
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number] Title PK 004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan And Development Plan Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Undertake the Park Master Plan and construction documents necessary to expand the turf area end park amenities on the two remaining undeveloped acres. The improvements will be completed in a single phase. Improvements also include the elimination of drainage problems and construction of a ramp to the Santa Ana River Trail.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The park improvements are necessary to complete the park and maximize the roughly five acres available atthis park Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship, but the improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout OM%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As park-related revenues become available.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
2011 -12
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic 250,000.00
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way 0.00
3. Construction 0.00
4. Contingency 0.0o
5. Equipment / Other 0.00
TOTAL COST: 250,000.00
2015-16
through Build-out
0.00 0.00
1,200,000.00
0.00 0.00
1,200,000.00
Total all Years
250,000.00
0.00 1,200,000.00
0.00 0.00
1,450,090.00
2012 - 13
2013 - 14 2014 - 16
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 62
V: 1.08.0 Date: 412712012 Time: 11:35 AM HB -301- Huntington Beach I Item 9. - 166 236
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/Title Pi< 005 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct improvements to the existing two and a half-mile long asphalt trail, including a split trail system for pedestrian and wheeled traffic.
The project includes 15% for citizen input, project design/engineering, soils and materials testing, project plan check and construction inspection. The project also includes a standard 10% for project contingency.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The project is necessary to reduce the rate of erosion of the very important blufftop area.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
None directly, the improvements are primarily necessary to maintain an existing asset Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As revenues permit.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment ! Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 -12
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2012 - 13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2013 - 14
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2014 - 15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2015 -16
through Build-out
120,000.00
0,00
800,000.00
80,000.00
0.00 1,000,000.00
Total all Years
120,000.00
0.00 800,000.00
80,000.00
0.00 1,000,000.00
63 Item 9. - 167 Date: 4/27/2012
Time: 11:35 AM HB -302- Huntington Beach October, 2011 237
2015 - 16
2011 -12 2012 - 13
2013 - 14
2014 - 15
through Build- out Total all Years
50,000.00
0,00
0.00 600,000.00
50,000.00
700,000.00
50,000.00
0,00
0.00 600,000.00
50,000.00
700,000,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/Title PK 1106 Edinger Dock Development Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct a new dock and boat launch.
Justification/ Consequences of Avoidance:
The improvements need to be made to meet the recreational boating needs of the community.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship, butthe improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Within priority and as Park Fund revenues become available.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition! Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
64 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 11:36 AM HB -303- Huntington Beach Item 9. - 168 238
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/ Title PK 007 Wardlow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construdion Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Reconfigure the park to accommodate a youth sports field and plan for additional parking. Construction costs for the little league field and parking lot are included at $380,000.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The parks earlier configuration is inefficient in terms of space.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship, but the improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development
Allocation To General Plan Buildout
0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
2010.
2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011 -12 2012 - 13
2013 - 14
2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
120,000.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 120,000.00
0.00 0.00
800,000.00
80,000.00
0.00 880,000.00
120,000.00
0.00 800,000.00
80,000.00
0.00 1,000,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0,00 0.90 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
65 65
Item 9. - 169 Date: 4/27/2012 Huntington Beach October, 2011 Time: 11:36 AlVI HB -304- 304- 239
2015 - 16
2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 -14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total all Years 350,000.00
0.00 0.90
0.00 0.00
350,000.00
350,000.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 360,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.90 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/ Title PK 008 City-Wide Parks Master Plan Submitting Departments: Community SenAces
Project Description:
The project consists solely of the preparation of a Perks Master Plan.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
A Master Plan of Parks is needed to insure the continued rational programmed development of the City parks system.
Relationship to General Plan Development
A Park Master Plan for the continued development of the City's Park system is directly related to General Plan development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference DOCUment
Project Timing:
The project is scheduled for the period of 2010 to 2020.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
66 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 11:36 AM HB -305- Huntington Beach' Item 9. - 170 240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number./ Title PK 018 Lamb Park Design And Development Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Design, engineer and construct park improvements on the 2.4 acre Lamb Park site. The improvements would include lighted sports facilities (ballfield and sportslield) and other neighborhood fixtures such as benches, sidewalks, drinking fountains and a play apparatus on the parcel, a closed school site.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The park improvements, mostly sports oriented, are necessary to complete the park and maximize the roughly 2.4 acres available at this park.
Relationship to General Plan Development
Little direct relationship, but the improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering I Administrate
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment! Other
TOTAL COST:
2011 -12
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2012 - 13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2013-14
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
2014 - 15
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
2015 - 16
through Build-out
132,000.00
0.00 880,000.00
88,000.00
0.00 1,100,000.00
Total all Years
152,000.00
0.00 880.000.00
88,000.00
0.00 1,100,000.00
76 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/2712012 Time: 11:36 AM
HB -315- Huntington Beach Item 9 . - 180
250
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Lend Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number:/ Title PK 010 Central Park Sports Complex Teem Room Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct a team-room at the sports complex. The facility would be used by teams for during game breaks. The fa.cility would have electrical service and possibly a drinking fountain but would not include shower/locker facilities.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The facility will provide sports teams with a location for team discussions, changing and personal effects security.
Relationship to General Plan Development
Little direct relationship, but the improvements axe consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020. 2015 - 16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
2011 -12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design / Engineering / Administratic
2. Land Acquisition / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
100,000.00
0.00 0.00
100,000.00
0.00 0.00
100,000.00
0.00 0.00
100,000.00
77 Item 9. - 18 1 Date: 412712012
Time: 11:36 AM
HB -316- Huntington Beach October, 2011
251
252
253
254
255
2015 - 16
2011 -12 2012 - 13 20-13 -14 2014 - 15 through Build-out Total ail Years 80,000.00
0.00 640,000.00
64,000.00
16,000.00
800,000.00
80,000.00
0.00 640,000.00
64,000.00
16,000.00
800,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/Title PK 02.1 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct a roughly 2,000 square foot expansion to the existing 10,000 square foot Oak View Recreation Community Center. The facility would consist of a game room, multi-purpose room and a restroom.
Justification / Consequences of Avoidance:
The facility is necessary (or planned) to maximize the fairly small facility.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The proposed land-use database indicates additional residential dwellings thatwould likely result in roughly 17,089 additional residents requiring at least 10,595 square feet of public use space in order to maintain the existing level of service (LOS) Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The expansion is planned for construction between 2010 and 2020.
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
1. Design / Engineering/ Administratic
2. Land Acquistion / Right Of Way
3. Construction
4. Contingency
5. Equipment / Other
TOTAL COST:
82 Huntington Beach Item 9. - 186 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Time: 5:26 PM HB -32 1- 82 -
256
End of Plan
Item 9. - 187 11B -322-
257
ATTACHMENT #10
258
259
evenue
ost
pecialists, LLC
Serving Local Governments Since 1975
October 17, 2011 (amended April 27, 2012)
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Via Mr. Fred Wilson, City Manager
City of Huntington Beach - City Hall
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: 2011- 12 Master Facilities Plan and Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation Honorable Mayor, Council and City Manager Wilson:
The City is experiencing private development of remaining vacant parcels and the on-going redevelopment of existing homes and businesses. This continuous development results in increased demand that must be absorbed (and accommodated) by the City's existing infrastructure and the Levels of Service (LOS) offered by that existing infrastructure. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C., was contracted to undertake a comprehensive identification of the capital projects and capital acquisitions necessary to accommodate all such new demands for municipal service. Such a study is necessary to preserve the existing Levels of Service (LOS) currently offered to and enjoyed by (after having been paid for by) the existing community from the diminution of those existing LOS due to the addition of new residential and business development in Huntington Beach and calculate the development impact fees (DIFs) necessary to fund those required projects.
Council and City staff, responsible for providing services to a continually expanding residential and business community, must recognize that the magnitude of the impact fees is a direct function of the nearly $403.4 million cost of the capital projects identified in the Master Facilities Plan as needed or required to accommodate new development. Regardless, anyone in the position of the Council members may find themselves reluctant to adopt the impact fees merely because they appear "too high". It is incumbent upon this Report and RCS Staff to convince the City Council of the justification and importance of the proposed impact fees The following Report calculates some new and a few updated impact fees for the City of Huntington Beach based on the aforementioned changes and the City's changing requirements for public safety, streets and signals, storm drainage and other quality of life facilities. The adoption of the updated DIFs will enable this City Council, as well as succeeding Councils, to continue to ensure that the City will be able to meet the basic infrastructure needs of new growth, without unduly burdening the existing population and business community for these development-generated capital costs.
Voice . 714 . 992. 9920 Fax 734 '9C Item 9. - 190
Internet ww revenuecot corn
1519:E.chapm Ave HB -325 FuJ1eitb CA 92831
260
$71,246,699
$61,234,227
$533,539,375
$203,631,313
$76,593,112
$1,166,934,162
$2,113,178,888