SC #21 from CF - 108 emails — City Council/Public Financing Authority, December 19, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

Fikes, Cathy
From: Vickie Bouffard <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 12:28 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL.CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection letter to Huntington Beach city council members Dour Huntington Bei
Boba Chic
Warner Avenue, Hui
strongly object to this

1. This high-density
density for the siu
Fikes, Cathy
From: Janet Kiang <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 2:59 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); [email protected] Cc: Janet Kiang
Subject: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmembers
Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmemebers.pdf Dear MB City Councilmembers:

Please see a copy of the signed objection letter (attached).

Sincerely,
Janet Kiang
Qbiection Letter to Huntmgton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not lunited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowdmg a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box- is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS mSANE PROJECT!
..T^JT ^ 5<^, ) 2-^/>^
(Signature) L-/ (Date)
TAA/ET \L\A/^C-^
(Print Name)
C^o} Ha^UP? t^n<
(Print Home Address)
C\j^o^>^ mo^ (^ l\cCh^(/x^ . COVY^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected] [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Barbara Steel <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 11:56 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL.CMO STAFF)
Subject: Please stop this building
al
Dear Huntington Beach C
proposed Bolsa Chica Seni
Warner Avenue, Huntingt
I strongly object to this proj<

1. This high-density Big B<
density for the surround!

2. The proposed apartment
not considered to be affo

3. This monstrositv will be
Fikes, Cathy
From: Staff | KJShimizu DDS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 1:05 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter to Big Box High Rise
Attachments: Objection Letter.pdf
Kerry J.Shimizu, DDS
5112 WarnerAve., #101
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
714-846-1354
Objection Letter IgHuntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feel setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than halt). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("El R") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the ElR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOjE~NCUnjEH?EJ>Pri1£»§ INSANE PROJECT!
/i-//0/^.0^
(Signature) ^ ^ ^ (Date)^
As-^ (r/y/^rzc^
(Print Name)nt
/7^7Z/ c^A-^^c, 4^/^ , ^//T CW ^^?
nt Home AJdress)
t/M^.<^ . C<P^ .
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: autumn autumn <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2023 7:40 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); [email protected] Subject: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Attachments: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers.pdf Sent from my iPhone
()l)ji\-UonlA'Hi'i\h^^""(i"yl"" l^'^l('ilV
\}f:\r H>in(ini;(«n Hrsirli Cilv ('innu'iliiu'nilfns, I wv,v yim li» .V"tt-jN() iiml DfHYAptH^vitl lor Ihc iiropo^l KolMi Clurn Srnioi l.iMiin (•iitiunnnil.v I'tojrct SCII No, 20221101)'t(l lofiilrd nl 'W2 iind Wl \V;n ncr Avrnnc. Hnn(ini;lon Ki';irli, CA. {)2h'\1) ((.•KI.SS sln'fls; Winner Avcniir iitid Hols;i Chicsi .Strcc(). I vimn;.;lv ol-wi Id llu^ in'aiccl loi nmiiv vnlkt iciis»i),s Hull inclinlc bul ;ue nol limik'd 1<> tlic lollov/ing ohjccl.ions:

1. Thishiph-ik'nsiiy lii;; Hd\ \\\^\\ ]<ise A|I;H'HI)UHI Kuildinj; is loo niii.ssivc in si/c, proporlioii, sco|)C, ;ni(l <iensity I'm (lu* snrnniiuliny lu'ii'liliorluxnl.

UK- pmiwal ;ip;unnrn| rcm prices will r;>nyc IrMin $5,()()0 to $1(),000 pci inonlh (,''> 120,000 per yc;ir) .'ind is nol i.-on.snli'i'i.'tl to IK' ;it~lorcl;il)lc liaiising. .<. I Ins mon-.trosuy will be Ci .slorics luyli inc.i.suring 72 I'cet I'runi tlic curb IM Ihc rooflop pariipcl in ;t iiciglihoilu'od ol'pretloiniimntly 2 story liigli structures.

4. hmll on ;i Zero Loi line wilh only a 10 feet sclb.'ick rroin tlic curb, this Big Box will spr.iwl over 3.5 iicrc.s ciwvdm;; a busy major iratTic inlurscction in Huntington Bunch.

5. ll \\ ill lie an nslonishing 69 dwelling miits-iicr-acrc bclicmutli tliiil is 5.4x l.irgcr tlian tlic surroniKliny striK'lurcs when most other projects in 1 IB arc limited to 25 dwelling unit.s-pcr-acrc.

6. The grossly inailcqu.ilc 189 parking splices for 202 aparlmcnt units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and 3 myriad of delivery and sen/icc trucks.

Spillovcr parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this prcdominnntly rcd-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a prcccdcnt-sctting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beacli community.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHunlington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the 'Tmdings*' for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and ucccpted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DEN^THI^ INSANE PROJECT!
i^M^_^_ nJia^(Sigiiylurc),/ ' / ' (Date)
_D^ Lul'^'-^_\/o.nb J..Q
(Prinl Nanie)
rJ,^'..- Vyu.V-Y'^. ^ <vl^\ Q ^^r^vf^\^(?(\c^ ('jL_^7jy (iq (Print llouicAddie-iS)
\
';. - l^.l'..i\.^^'\n':.n^>-();'.'y^'vll\_i^.\..
(him hinuiT/uklrc^) ^
l.ni;iil lo HIS CKy ( (uincil: ('i(y.('<)imcjl(rt;.surlci(y-lil).or[4, Roltin.l';sl;iui.sl;iu(/|iSurlcity-lil».orj; Fikes, Cathy
From: Janet Kiang <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 2:59 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); [email protected] Cc: Janet Kiang
Subject: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmembers
Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmemebers.pdf Dear HB City Coundlmembers:

Please see a copy of the signed objection letter (attached).

Sincerely,
Janet Kiang
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City CouncUmemb ers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Den^Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huatington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Hunttngton Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the Effi. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
:T^JT- t\ ^\ , ' ^M
(Signature) C._^ (Date)
_TAA/ET \^\A^C-}
(Print Name)
^o\ t-^kes ^vrv^
(Print Home Address)
C\j^^-bt ^O\T\(^ ^o^^ccA. cov\^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected] Robim.Estani§[email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Robert Trazo <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 2:38 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); [email protected]; Estanislau, Robin
Subject: re: objection letter for bolsa chica senior community living project Attachments: Objection letter - Trazo family.pdf
Dear City of Huntington Beach,
Please find attached my objection letter for the Bolsa Chica Senior Community Living Project.

Thank you,
Rob Trazo
8881 Stilwell Drive
HB,CA 92646
Dear Huntington Beach City Council,
My name is Robert Trazo. I live at 8881 Stilwell Drive, Huntington Beach, CA. I would like to provide comments to the statements and findings of the Draft Environmental Impact Report Related to the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project, SCH No. 2022110040 Located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. I would also like to be listed as a Interested Individual and receive all future correspondence, technical information and hearing notices.

First and foremost, I object to the general plan amendment to change the land use designation from CG to mixed-use (MU) and I object to the zoning map amendment to change the zoning from CG to specific plan (SP). I also object to the increase in allowable floor area ratio to 2.5 and I object to raising the maximum building height to 65 feet. I believe the impact on the environment has not been reasonably assessed and I have a strong disagreement to several statements made in the draft EIR. The project's inconsistency with the city of Huntington Beach policy and zoning will cause significant physical environmental impacts to our neighborhood.

My comments and concerns to the draft environmental impact report are as follows:

1.4 significant and unavoidable impacts:

I firmly disagree with the statement "the proposed project would not result in significant and unavoidable adverse impacts to the existing environmental setting" the proposed project would create a precedent for future development, the draft environmental impact report does not consider the approval of the project will open the door to future similar developments in the area. The effects of allowing a specific plan to subvert zoning regulations would cause extreme interest in developing surrounding projects of similar nature. This project needs to study the long-term accumulative impact of increasing the code required maximum density, the lack of code required parking and the effect on the adjoining neighborhood and the ability for the adjoining neighborhoods to absorb the street parking that would result in the deficiency of the required parking. The environmental impact report should also study the long-term effects of the sewer capacity and water capacity of the surrounding existing development of similar nature that could be redeveloped if this project were approved. The draft environmental impact report failed to provide a sewer capacity and water capacity study.

1.5.2 identification of the environmentally superior alternative:

I disagree with the alternate project, an alternate project could be proposed that complies with the existing adjacent zoning that is consistent with the surrounding community.

I firmly disagree "the no project alternative would result in greater environmental impacts to air quality and transportation to the surrounding circulation system due to the greater number of vehicle trips to and from the project site" zoning similar to the adjacent properties would result in less impact than the proposed project but would still achieve the goal of providing senior housing.

4.1; aesthetics
I disagree with the statement "the proposed project would not conflict with relevant goals and policies in terms of preserving the visual quality in the city" the city has developed zoning standards which does not allow for a 65-foot-high building structure. The building structure would tower over the existing residence which are only 2 stories tall. The proposed structure is not compatible in proportion, scale or character to the adjoining uses.

4.7 land use and planning
I believe the project would cause a significant environmental impact due to the conflict with the existing land use plan. Approval of this project would lead to approval of multiple projects in the area which would have a massive accumulative impact on the community which include aesthetics, traffic, noise, solar access, wind access, impacts to the infrastructure such as water and sewer capacities and street parking. The proposed project is inconsistent with the city's established development standards which have been used to design the surrounding infrastructure. The surrounding infrastructure was not designed to handle the proposed densities. I disagree that the overall impact to surrounding community would be less than significant when the cumulative effect of future developments similar to the proposed project is considered.

4.10: utilities and service systems
I disagree with the statement "the proposed project would have less than significant impacts associated with electric power and natural gas". The cumulative effect of approving this project would cause a landslide of similar developments in the area which would have a major impact to the available electric energy and natural gas, the existing infrastructure did not consider increasing the bulk density and mass of the proposed development. Approval of this project would cause additional projects of a similar nature that would have a cumulative effect on the availability of electricity and gas.

2.4.1 Aesthetics
I disagree with the statement "not create a source of substantial light or glare". Security and patio lighting on the 5th floor would be seen from the entire neighborhood. Nothing in the EIR evaluated the lighting spillover into the wetlands which requires dark sky. The Brightwater development respects the dark sky requirements of the Bolsa Chica Ecological Preserve, this project should address the impact to the Bolsa Chica Ecological Preserve. The proposed building elevations shown in the draft EIR appear to show exterior lighting fixtures that are not properly shielded. It is impossible to provide adequate lighting for the patio areas and shield all of the light spillover.

2.4.8 hydrology and water quality
Bolsa Chica Road Street of Warner Avenue lacks sufficient storm drain facilities to capture runofffrom the East that flows to the intersection of Bolsa Chica Street and Dunbar Avenue, as a result this intersection experiences flooding during normal rain events. The adjacent existing parking lot serves as an incidental detention basin and helps protect the surrounding properties. The EIR fails to analyze and address the effect of construction over the parking lot which would reduce the available ponding space and could cause flooding on adjacent properties. I believe this project will increase the depth of flooding at the intersection of Bolsa Chica Road and Dunbar Avenue.

2.4.14 recreation
I disagree with the statement "the proposed project does not include recreational facilities nor require the construction or expensing of recreational facilities that would result in a significant adverse physical effect to the environment, therefore project related impacts with respect to recreation are not evaluated further in this draft EIR". The proposed project is significantly under parked according to existing zoning, the city of Huntington Beach has established parking standards that eliminate the need for street parking. If developed, this project would cause excessive street parking which would inhibit access to the trail system. There is already a shortage of parking for people who are visiting the Bolsa Chica wetlands, this project would severely impact the available street parking leading to the trailhead at the southerly terminus of Bolsa Chica Street. The proposed project only considers parking spaces for the residential units and fails to address the required parking spaces for the estimated 110 employees who will work at the proposed multiple restaurants, wellness centers and studio spaces. It is not reasonable to assume 62 units are parked at a ratio of 0.65 spaces per unit when there is no mechanism stated to control whether a unit is assisted living or normal senior housing. I believe the parking should be evaluated as worst-case senior housing and a separate calculation added for the multiple restaurant style dining venues, wellness centers and studio spaces. Due to the tack of parking this development does not support the protection and maintenance of environmental open-space resources. The lack of on-site parking will prohibit access to the Bolsa Chica trail system.

2.4.16 utilities and service systems
I disagree with the statement "therefore, impacts related to the construction of wastewater treatment or collection facilities would be less than significant". Recently the Orange County sanitation District upgraded the sewer force mains and lift stations throughout the city, these systems should have been designed to comply with the existing zoning and did not consider the increased density this project is proposing. This project should consider the cumulative effect of increasing the density of existing sites within the vicinity to verify the additional sewer capacity is available to serve this site and future developments of this nature. The environmental impact report failed to provide an adequate sewer and water capacity study.

4.1.6 project impacts
I disagree with the statement "given the current visual quality of the project site, implementation of the proposed project consistent with the development standards and design guidelines specified in the specific plan would promote a cohesive community identity and enhance the visual quality of the project site to viewers on an off-site". Increasing the maximum height of the building to 65 feet would block the skyline view from the public way, the open sky view at the corner of Bolsa Chica and Warner would be forever impacted and would affect every person visiting the neighborhood/ the view would be replaced by a massive apartment building. Replacing a blue-sky view with an apartment building would have a negative impact on the community by destroying the public view of the sky.

I also disagree with the statement "therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant shade or shadow impacts to nearby residential uses. The shade and shadow study prepared by CRTKL is seriously flawed, a 65-foot-tall structure will cast a shadow in the easterly and westerly directions during sunrise and sunset during the spring and fall equinox, only the winter solstice was studied. This study proposes a shadow less than the building height. A study of the spring and fall equinox would prove Expensive shadows would be cast on the residential properties to the east and west of the proposed development.

4.1.10 cumulative impacts
I disagree with the statement "approval of the general plan amendment and zoning amendment would render the proposed project consistent with the city's establish development standards and no mitigation would be required." The existing zoning has been adopted by the residents for years and has been relied on by the residents to protect the integrity of the community. Allowing the general plan amendment and the zoning map amendment to change the zoning from CG to specific plan would cause long-term environmental impacts to the community. If this project is approved there will be a landslide of similar developments that will forever change the density of the community, this is evidenced by the recent development at Bella Terra and downtown Huntington Beach. This project should evaluate the cumulative impact of all sites of similar nature that would be subject to redevelopment. This project is not compatible with the long-term established development standards in the area.

4.2.3.1 air pollutants and health effects
The draft EIR failed to study the air quality in the vicinity of the project and used air quality data from Anaheim California, approximately 10 miles from the proposed development.

As stated in the initial study "occupants of facilities such as schools, daycare centers, parks and playgrounds, hospitals and nursing and convalescent homes are considered to be more sensitive than the general public to air pollutants because these population groups have increased susceptibility to respiratory disease." The air quality study fails to consider the proposed development and the residents who will be living in the proposed development. Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue are both 3 lane major highways that produce a significant amount of emissions. The study should consider the effect of these emissions on the people who will be living in the proposed development. As stated in the environmental impact report "high-volume roadways. Air pollutant exposures and their associated health burdens vary considerably within places in relation to sources of air pollution. Motor vehicle traffic is perhaps the most important source of intra-urban spatial variation in air pollution concentration/' Obviously, this site is notsuitableforsenior housing due to the proximity of the high- volume roadways.

Table 4.7.B: Gen. plan consistency analysis ERC-A
I disagree with the statement "these recreational and open-space elements would be for private.use by residents and not open to the public but are anticipated to reduce the strain on surrounding parks and open spaces as residents would be more likely to use the on-site facilities." The proposed project does nothing to maintain the current Park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1000 persons, the proposed development does not include any public open space for parks.

We trust the cityofHuntington Beach will not allow the certification of the environmental impact report and deny this project for the reasons stated above.

Thank you,
Sina

7. ^J.^\1
Robert G. Trazo
/""'-r
Fikes, Cathy
From: Vickie Bouffard <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 12:28 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection letter to Huntington Beach city council members Huntington Bei
proposed Boba Chic
Waraer Avenue, Hui
strongly object to this
1 • This high-density
density for the siu
Fikes, Cathy
From: Elaine Shimizu <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 3:43 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Vote No for Proposed Senior Living
Attachments: shimizu(2).pdf
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This inonstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in MB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach cpmmunity.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("El R") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and I>E^YTHIS INSANE PROJECT!
'^n'"'"^F7../.,' ... / ^ /_ ^
C(^ '^/^c'^^t^z^^-- _ /'^//^ /5_^
(Signature) , ^ , -(] ,(t>ate) /
^.f ^U/1<1 <^^(/^/^-6c
(Print Name)
<?\..i.,^ I ..,„, /1.B. ^ <?^^^J'4^ ( Oc^^n^i L-^i-i^/
(Print Home Address)
H-B.^H / ^ / ^ ^^^^^ ^ <:^m
(Print Email Address) (
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Debbi Snedden <[email protected]>
Tuesday, December 12, 2023 11:30 AM
CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); [email protected] Objection Letter for proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community K
.*•
:'il
s
0 mG
0-
2 G-
I
Fikes, Cathy
From: Gisselle Dragan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 8:33 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Please VOTE NO and DENY proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Hello,
Dear Huntington Beach City council members, I urge you to vote NO and deny approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community project SCH No.2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Ave, Huntington Beach, Ca 92649.1 strongly object to this project for many reasons including, but not limited to, the following:

1. The apartment building is too large in size and is not consistent with the proportion, scope, and density of the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed range of rent starts at $5,000 per month and would not be considered affordable housing nor would it help ease housing affordability strains affecting Huntington Beach, CA.

3. Whether the building is 6 stories and 72 ft tall or 5 stories and 65ft tail - it is too tail when considering the surrounding neighborhood.

4. The project should remain consistent with other projects - 25 dwelling units per acre.

5. A new study should be done to confirm that the proposed allotted parking spaces is adequate for the occupancy, especially when considering that only a small portion of the proposed project will be for memory care and assisted living, to not further impact city street parking.

6. The existing Environmental Impact Report is deficient in addressing many issues including responding to public comment.

Because of the items I have listed above, I urge you to vote NO and deny approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community. Please know that I and many members of the Bolsa Chica community will be following this decision closely. Make the correct choice to hear the voices of your constituents and preserve what makes our city beautiful.

Respectfully,
Gisselle Dragan
Email: [email protected]
Address: 16582 Nube Ln
Fikes, Cathy
From: Carol Chang <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 11:39 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmembers
Objection Lejlerto Huntii
Dear Hundngton Beach CUy Councihnenbers,
proposed Bolsa CUca^eniorUving Community
Warner Avenue, HuntingtonJBeach7cA^92M9(i
strongly object to this project formany valid reason

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartmen
density for the surroimding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices wfll range f
not considered to be affordable housing.
3, This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measurii
neighborhood of predominantly 2 story Ughste

4. Built on a Zero Lot line wilfa only a 10 feet setfc
crowdmg a busy major traflSc intersection in Hi
It will be an astomshmg 69 dwelling units-per"!
structures when most other projects in HB are lj
The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces fbr 1
visitors, customers of the proposed ground ftoo
SpiUover paridng wiU saturate die area witti ovi
is extremely limited street parking in this predo
hiking trails in the Boka Chica Ecological Res<

7. The "Senior Living Commumty" Njel for this i
apartment units are designated for assisted Gar^
wealthy adult tenants who will presumably reqi
8, This Big Box is a precedenl-settmg Trojan Hoc
more Big Box high rises thatwill destroy our q

9. The Environmental Impact Report (C<ETRM) for

5. 6.

Fikes, Cathy
From: Barbara Steel <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 11:56 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: Please stop this building
"5 xas,
Objectio
Dear Huntington Beach C
proposed Bolsa Chica Seni
Warner Avenue, Huntingt
I strongly object to this proj<

1. This high-density Big B<
density for the surround!

2. The proposed apartment
not considered to be affo

3. This monstrositv will be
Fikes, Cathy
From: Staff | KJShimizu DDS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 1:05 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter to Big Box High Rise
Attachments: Objection Letter.pdf
Kerry J. Shimizu, DDS
5112 WarnerAve., #101
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
714-846-1354
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets; Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Living pommunity" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Envit-onmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the ElR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

Please VQZE'NQ-anjEi-TOF^TJHiS INSANEJPROJECT!
/-^-
(Signature) ^/ /^ ^ (Date/
^/^^
^y^ (r/y/^rzc^
(Print Name)
/7^^/ c^h-^^L. ^^z_ .7/^r CW ^^y?
(Print Home Acfdress)
/<^.1b^(^) /^^ , CA^__
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: autumn autumn <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2023 7:40 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); [email protected] Subject: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Attachments: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers.pdf Sent from my iPhone
=-.1:.
>^
^
c'
n0
3 303
Crt
•o
•a
0 3.
0 ^>
0c
c
0 v>
3 &.
&3
3 ~3
y0
N^-g°' 0"^
?S.' 0
='^< -0
da o 8
n e 5
^&-1
o C;
> °. w
e -o °3.
s-s='" 0
g'i3 y
24^^8 5
I'll

1.1 §t-5-1
=J3 d ^ d 5^si t^.
m 03
•-< ^ 0"
u 5 5. 3
@-c S'3T.
w|.a5^i I l.i
I ii|gin
^'^ :S. ^ ^- =" ^
silJi ^.

IIIi 11&0 -" '^, '?: ^ .=
?^ _2 ^ ^i- y' -^ r~'
"^ r=s '^~ -^ ^ ^
'/
r", ^
u =• '•y S- d3 2 ?- = ^. 1 ~ ^~- '^- =• S = •-
EL =- -a
3 ri
(A D
o rs
g '" n.

OS."
illo ^:- ^r.
^ §•
$ 2.
3-03
0 3 £3
S. i
?" P3 -^
-t: M
ill.5? S g
3;- g^.T
g-B.1
& 5- Q.
0 trt "-.
2 S2. "
j~r era' en
S 5- 7>
2;!^
Z 5 sr
m^.°
§11"' § ?
s 2.1:

S3"
•?"-s »
S2. " ^S;- 2. n-
0 ^ §
iy-
S' 2-- S5" n
H sT 2
^§-°i
Sl.3i
Ill-
IllIt INlI'^i
SQ»'
S3'.S."
^ ^o S o
Ill:tllI § ?0 3 0
*< 5 o
c- =• o
§•? y-
ri -=
V3 C3
C vs
w
w ^y o<? °-
n
IN
3i(
M t/>
•a =?•
II:ji
•s0
»
8 re
'^"
tl
Q
sl
05" o
§'f
s-d3 2 ?T =
0 —• Vt _f, ~^
y. T.
5 ^=."'0,5 ^ ?; ^ 5-== ^-= ^—'-=^; =
iir^lec o
era —
ri
i- ?
x —
2-<g
?s
5- 73
^ s
"s|
S ? ^' -a "S
B^s 1.1.y v^ y a
05 " S. .=' s
iltSI-0
V 0 '3 -
v.~ % 5 2 :S .=-' i; r? ="
("•
0= ;C
0 y- s-
r/
'^ fsj y. ^
- E v.'_ ^.
03 a "
0 x
§-s
i§
'< 5"yi o 2
-3 °
1 3*^
C I 3.3 £.
" I s
3 <
•7-i
3 Ih
n o5
0 c~ =
0 Wc- ^
§ is ^
E3
3ES
•<:
s
Illo e
w
I
0 »
ft
Crt =T
^ ^-'t s
.= u(TO Q.
sw
C v.

5. o
V) Sl.
^l
0 if
M ^
c
0 Vt
as
3 l!i.
0—
m
0s=
»^s
0 B
B
?3
rtB
^<
0<0
y."0
3S
n
0 1£'^.

M =T-
g-sl.
v: c: r.
s ^ ss = ^
y 0 '-n
HI
Vi "
4 §-w
Pl
ill= &: §
I?1
M *<
= ~3
Vt
il.ir8i
? i"
••< _ n
^l
•J-. =- •£

2. =£. S
t-~* ^ .s"
5 2 =.n n
0 =-
i€c
0£J
^. F. K
7~ ^ ~~3
?§ ^S. ?• 7?
TS
wT--n
y>
-Cri
"</• - '
-^ - c- -^
t i- i ^
U _> ^L —
ere if o =
n
£ = ^ ^
x
$
1/3
s
<n
—I
^>
-3
c
=;
;^~
t^
0~-l
^<
<-.
,N;
r;
-^
r:
f~i
1 r It ;i
<; ~^ ^ "~ ;1N
^ './I ;G? .-^
t^ ;<
J~ = :=-

5. °
c. 5-
s^0M
n
-3
c-~
rs
Fikes, Cathy
From: Cunningham,Janet <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2023 1:59 PM
To: Estanislau, Robin
Cc: CITY COUNCIL (INCL.CMO STAFF)
Attachments: HB building prqject.pdf
Attached are 2 letters of Objection for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project at Warner and Bolsa Chica.
[ADVENTISTHEALTH:INTERNAL]
Ofejec^ea Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Houiffinsgton lieiucti City Counciloiembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed BolAd Chica Senior Lmng Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Aveaae, flluBttOgtou Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Waraer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly plg(e>Ctfo:fliis;project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. Tliis high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density' for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices wi]l range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is BQ$ considered to be aflfordable housing.

3. This mocstrpsity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood bfpredommantiy 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntiogton Beach. 5, It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that wilt allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mirigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose sigoificant adverse impacts in Vrolatkm of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the E£R and CEQA too numerous to list all herein;

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntfngton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^^A^ -^^^-^^ /^^^9.j$
(Signature) (Date)
CMu)^ c^u^^^J
(Print Name)
i^m ^,^^4 ^5? z^} /y.^'. ^'2^(^'
(Print Home Address)
c^L/s^e ^ <S -^^JL. c_
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council; CHy.CouncH(%surfcUy-hb.org, Robin.Estani8lau@Surfcit>'"hb,org Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Waraer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects ui HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR falls to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the E1R fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENYJHIS INSANE PROJECT!
^t^^U-^ —-_ _ /^ - ^ - Z.^^-3
(Date)
\T/X v\^.^ Ct^y\y\ \ ^ ct ka^r\
•rint Name)(Print Name)
1^-I^Z- S^^^-a. L^ Ln ^ <4u^^.h^ <&^^. M ^Z6/?
rint Home Address)(Print Home Address)
C^c^l^u^^- ^'3'dp ^ ^| ^Kfl^J , <^C^y-^
(Print Email Address) ^
Email to HB City Council: City.Council(u?surfcity-hb.org, Robin.Estanislaufrt'Surfcity-hb.org Fikes, Cathy
From: Lydia Santa Cruz <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2023 6:29 AM
To: McKeon, Casey; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: please confirm receipt additional objection Fwd: Document - Dec 8,2023 Attachments: Doc - Dec 8 2023 - 4-05 PM.pdf
from Chris Mezzano (below)
Thank you
"I slept and dreamt that life was joy.

I awoke and saw that life was service.

I acted and behold, service was joy."
~ Rabindranath Tagore
Begin forwarded message:

From: Lydia Santa Cruz <[email protected]>
Date: December 9, 2023 at 6:23:27 AM PST
To: Lydia Santa Cruz <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Document - Dec 8,2023
"I slept and dreamt that life was joy.

I awoke and saw that life was service.

I acted and behold, service was joy."
~ Rabindranath Tagore
Begin forwarded message:

From: C Mezzy <[email protected]>
Date: December 8, 2023 at 4:06:32 PM PST
To: Lydia Santa Cruz <[email protected]>, Lydia Santa Cruz <[email protected]>
Subject: Document - Dec 8, 2023
Scanned with TurboScan.

Sent from my iPhone
r&
y
3 If1
ft
w
E
I
ja
a-^i
r^j-
<s>
^'i
'S 11
nm?I§1
»1B&<
i!ili 5-g. I
i'l-B^IE^
jI liftIjlij£gt|l?jp-
t S ^
JTs'&^I.S
•fr§;8SSa§:iB'
ag't 5>Se..S'?'B'
i§
?lli21
llill^tl??tijsll
:!rJ?fiiJ'rj
bB
(0
Fikes, Cathy
From: Steven Mink <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 8:30 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmembers 2023-12-08.pdf Huntington Beach City Council,
Thank you for taking the time to record my OBJECTION to the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No.2022110040. PLEASE vote NO and DENY this project from continuing.

Steven S. Mink
4592 Winthrop Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCU No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warmer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is -^ not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet & tback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre. ;_, ~-^. "

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parkmg on streets that are akeady overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remainmg 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horsr that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy o qu et "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("ETR") i^ tliit.^ roject fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant envu-onmental impacts ofthilTproject; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the Effi.'s analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone whic1" is fre oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruptiou. The City ofHuntmgto"' ' '"h 1. 's si rt»' (dal evidence to support the "findings for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning TextAm md Joi^fti.r .al Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, reg- .-<-^ ind established and accepted p^^'-ss.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANEYItO CT!
-2-&- ^. A<7 - 81>^^oz3
(Signature) (Date)
Sf-e-Mevt < Ki/l|^
(Print Name)

4.^ VhnUw<^~I>^ ^aAn^^'^^ ^A <?2^ti<:i _ -' '
(Print Home Address)
<S\e\?ei^. rn'i v\k i (^ <r\M^i \ . ceyn
IJ (Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 12:09 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection Letter -vote no on proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Project

Fikes, Cathy
From: Kim D <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 8:42 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); [email protected] Subject: Re: Vote NO
Attachments: 20231208_084003.jpg
On Dec 8, 2023 8:41 AM, Kim D <[email protected]> wrote:

Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City CouncUmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembcrs, [ urge you to VoteNO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing,
This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet In a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

It will be an astonishmg 69 dwelling units-pcr-acrc behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB arc limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("ETR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts m Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EFR-'s analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the E1R and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
2-^

2. 3.

5. 6.

7. 8.
^-\
/2-f
(Date)
^<2—-
(Print Name}
^0 ^ 7- ^r^L^ PC
(Print Home Address)
<06^^ / t^-h
(Print Email Adc}rejA)
Email t. HB Gift C.u»cU: Ci.y.Co.adl@,»rf.l>y-l.r."r8. R.I>,».E....i.l."®S»,f.i<,-l>b..,e A_^^l
. ^w"—
Fikes, Cathy
From: nancy genser <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 10:56 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmembers
Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmembers.pdf Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 20221 10040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. Tliis monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures,

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Hnntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area witli more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
IL-
7i a y/ c-,-/' .- \^Wi^/ /.2 -. j; -^ ^
(Signature) / (Date)
/^M/^c^' ^c,^^'.-_
(Print Name)
/^•f^^ ^^at-&.&/u^ ^.'7/^y^/ ^^^^^ ^ ^^^<
(Print Home Address) U
,7 -3 n ^y-7 < -^ ^^^/ /i^rfn a //. /.'^\^_
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council:

Fikes, Cathy
From: The UPS Store 001 5 <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin Subject: Scanned Document on behalf of Teresa A Bellmore Attachments: 20231208143052425.pdf
Please see attached.

Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-densify Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing. • . -

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow.parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
C^ps^/ff ^. ^5^/M^^Y^^ _ ^/^r_£_2^z3
(Signature) ' (Date)
"^rr^a A. l^rllpnor-e
(Print'Name)
CL-jy'^. ^ap^nne. Dr'Ve-, H-.B C)<'J.+
lome Address) ^" I / "~(Print Home Address)
+^brUmore-@)/ vahoo. ^rr^
(Print EmaiTAddress)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Julie Laszlo <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 8:02 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); [email protected]; Florin Gainaru Subject: Objection Letter
Attachments: OBJECTION LETTER_001.pdf
Kind Regards,
Julie Laszlo
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 1 0,000 per month ($ 1 20,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housmg.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Buvlt on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and con-uption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^afe^- ' >^~^^. _ ./^>>^=?
(Signafyfe) <J) (Date)
^y /^//^ z^j?^.^
(Print Name)
/^ ^^/^^^ ^^ ^^. ^-^ /<^-< /^A ^^<-^?
(Print Home Address)
J^ ^ A'^'^^-'^'^^.^y. ^^>,
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathi
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Patricia Hegeman <[email protected]>
Thursday, December 7, 2023 10:35 AM
CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Estanislau, Robin
Please Vote No
UfelS^ffl.J^U^HMtfayitaa^^j. citVCo-ncttffl.mb^
£tw8)mdat(m)i^di?c!rtdte»m<.tn' HrpjMU^
^^^w;^^^^vs^^^^^^^''^^'•""• Awim, Sisa^M.W^ ^ ^*W*<awWfW WuwrAnmn wid1ei«h«'CUu>sTmH'.' I "^rty^hitaA^^w^y^idrt.^^i^^^i^^u™^
I. Tilt hEgk-itejBm,, pja 8*< H^k RtoApU'wsl BulUlfft li w nuiHe in itt,, pn^w.w, K^. uul i 'nicptOpa^t|)«T|ng;^(nW*W@"UI!' fr°m».<Wt"$lu,IWpcrm.mlh(»Hu^i&t.3.y^,)uj,, A niiBaMuimuii'n'afhJ'itot" tiJBhniGBUcist 72 f6« Inwi Uic cuA to ite WSTop [n.-^«;> In »

4.,®^?^^^?^^^^^tow1l^mtfvilc-='
^i^^s^^s^^^^-—^; i^^di^K%^S^^'^^w^M^»^'^p^^"p^l^ i.u?-H..o3 • myr*j ar6divcty ud terticc iracU St»Utintp«iU» wfll iatuntB d»e un wi* mcrilo* puktag un •IrecU tluil uC ttfady uvnctirmiail, Itec b ntW*n^ 1™!^ drrt plnU^ In thb p^du^^rtlr <ri<urtv4 iun 1^ i» » <naj« g^ hikjftt trallt ta Ihe lldt* C3iu EttikisW RI-KTTC
T. Tlit •'ScaiWl.htaijC'unnlMidly'1 lnlxl fbrltiij 81^ Bon is iBWionAlly B{tltAlLi?it as ooly t M uiu tif ill* KC ^BipiW(,iim6«»<teng("l^for«a^c*^^^l^ Ttm KaiAiaag 102 wiiu •mil ticfeiii'ftl la Wtthby *duB ta»U)0 -who will pwpriniyy roynra 2 puking ipurn {ha uni;. (,. TllltCit Baiiltpwcdml-Ktlus Tn-^afl HCTVS thu •*lll iillo-o otlser<)w(|oi>en to utiunn; ttu i.T-a *iih w<WlEHt.B!St:B^i.ma Bat will dntmy our iimrt •Vwf City" bai.-li coeirounily.

A. ;,^;Bi;ii^»m<ttf.BiT*rt Aqx>n| fKW") [f» UaipwjW fiiili u hlastu*lriy identiiy, trady.w. er mid^ilc ihi:
•na^'j^iB^/wylnmi^^ i"if^»ofM*^i^6^^M^ '"nt tuily/c in BMUTH.- «ri ia»p^piyw dacrijxion; ssvtttw 81R fiib to ddckw sipillKtn inh'e™ BU(>KU HI VidlJihu.s cf :^(^'^<^^> ^]^^f<^i^w inp^ miiiteiaR'smulyA BfahtTwftyct Is • ^S^a^B^^mtlteRlp^tteGu^^
•viot*&B»(iribd eUtuidCEQA hx> niimeiwu
^^gj^^lKnu;,.. .-;,-..., „,.,.„.. .,.._.._., .,....;.'.. ^ '.. : ;^^ln^U*y»ljrtt»4i«iy^^ Zont ^faichii'liwAldettvco^a^ fom irfumitit p^^^^^fWidwnr^lSlk^riSt^
>:ABmlila^':%oii^;Tn^^Bi<^fl^;^^^ olbd
<gJCT^t?ti^^^^^?^y^<^^^ "»Yv?^SSD&srr^«^^^^s^ ' 'I ,
^
w
'M^
im W^^wf^
|rt^A^tfO-(|ff^
bRfltitn.lit»nhbi»^6Mfcity^b^
~*.-:1
Sent from my iPhone
Fikes, Cathy
From: Lydia Santa Cruz <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 9:08 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Cc: Carols Banes; Lydia Santa Cruz
Subject: 2 Objections to Bolsa Chica Project
Attachments: 2 Objections to Bolsa Chica Project Document_2023-12-07_205507.pdf Dear HB City Council members
Hello, please confirm receipt of these two strong objections to the Big Box Project! The city is becoming an asphalt jungle.

Additionally, more traffic at that dangerous intersection is a matter of public safety Let's preserve the Surf City Legacy before it's too late. We voted for you, please show that you care.

Thank you
Objection Letter t® Huntinston Beach City Couacilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Liwng Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warmer Avenue, Hnntmgton Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

1. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box wiU spmwl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

SpiUover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remainiug 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Tmpact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EDR. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and tfae EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EBR. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and comiption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

PIefise VOTE NQand DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
/V7/^ :^
(Date)/
g^^^^w—-. - ' ^^
(Print^ie)
^7^o J^ ^^^S/^^AJ ?f7&5-^~7^^^^^
(Print Home Address)
m^f^/Vof^ ^[(/jL/\SO ' CGT^-^
(Print Email Address) /
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter t® Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Amn'oval for the proposed Botea CMca Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Waraer Avenue, Huntiagton Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) aad is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet iu a neighborhood of predominantly 2 stoiy high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling umts-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking wiU saturate fhe area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is mtentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setdng Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("ETR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts offfais project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EBR. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the E1R and CEQA too numerous to list aU herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
<S^-\ ,C^-&2-^^^^<Q(^-<<=^-——- v ^-'
(Signature) _ (Date)
m^<2>
(Print Name) ^. _ , ^ l
>'5"ni< Tom&A ^ vo+, V\'S.(hA <3(^4'?
(Print Home Address)
<^Q.OCr^V\?5^ ^<sJ^ao. €.OI<A
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Charlie Knoth <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 11:24 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); [email protected]; Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter.PDF
Attachments: Objection Letter.PDF
Myself and my family are vigorously opposed to the Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project as it is currently proposed. This is High Density Development regardless of how the developer labels it and should not exceed three stories. Please vote NO and DENY APPROVAL of this project.

Objection Letter to Huntingfon Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This gigantic high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion,scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood and violates established city building codes.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity is the equivalent of 6 stories high measuring 72 feet tail from the sidewalk at the intersection ofWamer and Bolsa Chica. to the rooftop parapet plus an additional 6 feet higher for rooftop equipment in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story tall structures. It will tower over most nearby structures by 3x.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line within 5 feet of the property line with as little as a 10 feet setback (subterranean structure is only 5 feet from property line). This Big Box will sprawl over 2.8 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection at Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger mass than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apartment units provide limited parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half !). The remaining majority 102 units offer no senior care and will be rented to 55+ years old tenants who presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is dgficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations oj/Huntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. ^t^^^—^ _ /2.-7-'2o2-3»(Signatfire) ' ' ' (Date)
^f\/u^t^ ^4Zot^
CPrintName)
-7H7- ^^ r>^ ^(^ ^-z^^^
(Print Home Address)
<^T ({&'/y I h Y^OVA^\ \,'e^(so^ yi^.
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Fikes, Cathy
From: Valerie M. Sargent <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 3:52 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter - Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community, SCH No 2022110040 Attachments: VMS Objection HB_12-6-23.pdf
Dear HB City Council Members,
Please see my attached letter of objection to the high-rise senior living community being considered near my home.

Sincerely,
Valerie M. Sargent
e: [email protected]
m: 949.637.0104
Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures,

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trajan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form uf zoning scheming and coiruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. lease VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
<L
J^A^t l/luA«-w^J-—— _ ^"^-^3
(Signature) (\ \ " (Date)
'e Vh. <8o-r^^\J-~
(Print Name)
\^\ ./H^^f (^r ^pkCL, 4^^'An- g^<^, P4 ^^^
(Print Home Address)
\/<LUYtt°L<^d-^&<A-H^5> <^yi^<xJ({. an^_
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: David Ferling <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 2:30 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Proposed High Rise Objection Letter
Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Council Members.pdf Dear HB City Council,
Attached is an objection Letter to the proposed high rise facility at Bolsa Chica & Warner.

David Ferling
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Dear Huntington Beach City Council Members,
I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity is proposed at 5 stories high but plans indicate it will rise 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 2.8 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in MB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per- acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT! Limit HB housing to 3 stories or 35+ feet.

Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members pg2 .c\
Vv^^3^ 12/6/2023
(Signature) (Date^
David Ferling
5102 Robinwood Dr, HB 92649
(Print Home Address)
[email protected]
(Print Email Address) Email to HB City Council: [email protected] , R_obin,_Estanislau@ Surfci.tv-hb,o \'Q
(Print Name)
Fikes, Cathy
From: Chiara Germelli <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 11:53 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Vote NO for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project 9 "->->—*» '
% <?u 0
H iH
§.s.s'&• ^^ lr»
Fikes, Cathy
From: Tricia Thienes <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1126 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Opposition Letters - Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No.2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Ave.

Attachments: 20231206111053139.pdf
Good morning,
Please see the attached 6 letters opposing this project.

Thank you,
Tricia Thienes | Sr. Executive Assistant Carrington Holding Company 25 Enterprise, 5th Floor | Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Office: (949) 517 - 5514 | [email protected] -—Original Message-—
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 10:11 AM
To: Tricia Thienes <[email protected]>
Subject: Message from "RNP002673874B96"
Attention: This message was sent by an external sender. Please be mindful before clicking a link or opening attachments This E-mail was sent from "RNP002673874B96"(MP C5503).

Scan Date: 12.06.2023 11:10:53 (-0700)
Queries to: [email protected]
Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments), may contain confidential information protected by law.

The information contained herein is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender at the e-mail address listed above and destroy all copies of the original message, including any attachments. Thank you.

Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 1 0,000 per month ($ 1 20,000 per year) and is not. considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR. fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other vioj^ns ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. sTO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
/w^
(Date/
W^L^ ^^/J//1}^-
(Print Name)
S(^l ^TS^f^l^hlG^ ^-^^
(Print Home Address)~7~^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HE City CouncU: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishmg 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VO^E )<JO ?fl|d DENY TjH^ I^ANE PROJECT!
(Print Name)
1tj^.
(Print Hon^ Address)
/->- ^,-^7
(Signature) |j^ ^ ^ / ^ (Date)
i
JA 1^-
wy/, ^.^j.s^^ D/?, ^./^ ?i^^f
^ ' ''
/^ /A^- ^>^cr- /l/^'T
(Print Email A3dre§jb)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Himtington Beach City Councilmemb^rs Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot Ime with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleadmg as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parkmg spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS WSANE PROJECT!
^ P^ 2<9^3
(Signature) ' (Date)
At^U. ^ALA/T^
(Print Name)
<o0^ ^CFA^tLi. r>P.fV?/H(J^riM&T£>^ ^A<:t-4 CA ^4-^
(Print Home Address)
^\^ ^r\\ e-p^cy^ad . C£>yv\
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] \D/\^, ^Jt Vou^»+ <ya<o5-t~ l+j>p ^^r?|10^^ l^c<iU
4^~fwrY)er<^UY)ctl +h€o^ i^e ^tl^^ net^hborhoods Abon,<(- Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Coiincilmembers t^^ ^ ^Pd ^Y^ t?rz>(r?»<>^.~b ^^tc^i0^ ^^
Dear Huntington Beach Cfty Councllmembers, I urge yotrfo Vote IW and Deny ApDrbvai proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly olyect to thisproiect for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwellmg units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setdng Trojan Horse that wiU allow other developers to saturate tins area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "SurfCfty" beach coimmunity.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate Ae:
many significant environmental impacts of this project; and Ae EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and fte EIR fails to disclose significauit adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form ofzonmg scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
J CUtU?. BOA^-q
ignature)
!:> ^-2^
(Signature) - - — ) (Date)
lVla;r)P Bailed
rint Name)(Print Name)
(^Dl (^((cnn/uoivl r)r'K^h-bn^n B&ath. ^2fc48
(Print Home Address)
^a'thp.hq.l^. ]-]<\[ @ qoiait. £Qi^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City CouncU: City.Cuuncil(a;.surfcity-hb.org, Robin.Es(nnislau@Surfcity-hl).org Objection Letter to Huntington Beach C\tv Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huatington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DS^Y TfflS WSANE PROJECT!
f^aJU^ftftM>L _ A% -7^^-23
(Date)
?^ft.(Print Name) ~1^ v T7~0~
"]f^!! ^ l)r~ -^ W^
(Print Home Address) "" ' ' / '
^wW.<
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] f^>
^. -f^ c$^ 'Oc)
Obiection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high struchires.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EUR. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EER. fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form. of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntmgton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE N? and DENY THIS WSANE PROJECT!
^^^J^5^J-A^ ^^JN^JSJ^^^ \^—-\—^-
(Signature) ~"s^ ' ^^ 0 (Date)
•^(ZSSVOQs \\<^^
(Print Name)
\^S^. SO^LZO^K^ L(^N\<^^^ <\^^'7
(Print Home Address)
\\Q.'(\T\^^SS\COs^-(o^ 0^0.^. COV^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Lisa Dillman <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:34 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: strong objection to proposed development at Warner Ave and Bolsa Chica St Attachments: PXL_20231206_213248923.jpg
<^iectioix_Letteiih^iiui»thigt9n_Beach^^ CouncUmembers
fferar HHiif.'ingi-oiit Rcnch City Couincilinneroil>ct~s, I nrnr ymi tn .^t.eNO nMit DenyApjirovai TOT tfie proposed Boisa Chtcn Senior .Lh'inR CommmHty I''rnje<;l RC'.M No. 2<n%l)0040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntingitnm Bench, CA, 92A49 (crosH •itrftcts; "Wnrner Avenue ami Bolsa Chil<:?i Street), ! strongly object to this project for innny valid ri.-'nsoiiR Uint inr.lmlc but are not Umitecl to the follovnng objsctions:
i. Tins high-density Big Box High Rise Apnrlmonl nnilding IK too tnassive in size, proportion, scope,and density tbr the sniToundiiig ncigliborlioud.

2. The proposud apartment rout prices will rongy froin $5,000 to $10,000 per motith ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be nftbrdable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet irom the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stmuhircs.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It mil be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-pcr-acre behemoth that is 5,4x larger than the surroimding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre. 6, The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parkiug on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited sh-eet parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 unite will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for ttiis project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse unpacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative unpacts is deficient; and the Effi-'s analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Fmal EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EtR. and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

PIeasie VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
.r~2w^^ _ -p^, ^ zoy
(Signature) (Date)
//.^ <-2>///^^
w;?6 ^.^ ^. ^^ . ^^^L w/c>
(Print Home Address) / ^?p
rf» //,'sW s^^/-c6^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Courtney Edmonds <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 10:27 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Vote No on Project SCH No.2022110040
Please see attached objection letter. Thank you.

Courtney Edmonds
Obj
Dear Huntmgton Bi
proposed Boba CM
Warner Avenue, Hi
strongly object to fbi
\. This high-densil
Fikes, Cathy
From: Carol Gillette <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 8:30 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection letter
c
Dear Huntingtoc
proposed Bolsa C
Warner Avenue,
I strongly object t<

1. This high-den;
density for the
^
2 IHT^^
Fikes, Cathy
From: Christina Salgado <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 11:08 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection letter to project on Bolsa Chica and Warner Attachments: 12-04-23_objection-letter.pdf
Please find attached my objection to the proposed monstrosity at the corner of Bolsa Chica and Warner. I cannot believe that you are actually considering approving a project such as this one.

Respectfully,
Christina Silva-Salgado
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Coundlmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity wilt be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks. Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.
7, The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that wilt allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will .destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City of Huntington Beach tacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations of Huntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANEJWJECT!
'71^^^'^^^^-^ _/2-^'^>
(Signature) (Date) ^
d- ^A ^•t\ ~^A- ^1 ,-(^4- ' <. A /- <^€>o
(Print Name)
-]k€^ oprwo wve ? CA ^fz^s
(Print Home Address)
V^r i c^ lS(y <»•- <^o I • C-.
(Print Email Address)
Fikes, Cathy
From: Norma <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 12:22 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCLCMO STAFF)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Objection Letter to HB City Councilmembers
Objection Letter to Huntii
Dtnr Hunttugton Beach Ctty Councilmcmbcrs,
proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community
Warner Avemie, Huntington Beach, CA» 92649 (
I to this project for many valid reasc
1, Ttiis high-ctensity Big Box High Rise Apartmer
density for the surrounding neighborhood.

X. The proposed apattmwt rent prices will range <
not considered to b© aflfordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuril
neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stt
4, Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet sett
crowding a busy major traffic intersection in H
5< Itwll be ? astonishing 69 dwelling unifs-pe^-s
istructures when most other projects in HB are 1
€* The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for
visitors, customers of the proposed ground floc
Spillover parking will saturate the area with ov
limited parking in this predc
Nkmg frails in fce Bolsa Chica Ecological Resi

7. Tlte 4'Sentor Uving Commimity" label for this
are designated for assisted care
weaIAv adult tenants wha^ill presumably req
Fikes, Cathy
From: Steve Pinkston <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 12:58 PM
To: Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection to Warner Bolsa-Chica building.

Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Council Members..pdf Please find the attached letter.

Sincerely
Steve Pinkston
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This .high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the sun-ounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. . The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box" is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EBR. fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond toj?ublic comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein^

10. This projecj^a blatan^/and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning schemip^and comip^ibn. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for^SOhing Map A^fendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other }latiops of9B6tington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. ^lea^ffXSf, NO and QENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^rwe)^ (D&te)
^^Ui •PW^^TE (Print Name)
^{ ^^ ^ U^ 92(^7
(Print Home Address)
^ ^< y3^ ^ >'^^^ ^ ,'?^' ^« C^M
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jo Romero <[email protected]>
Tuesday, December 5, 2023 12:49 PM
CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Obejection Letter-Bolsa Chica Senior Living Project
Sent
°biaH tortJ-i'IKI-luirDnHniitrtonF.ichCHvCY.yndtnicnibtrg !l«t HllMlnttnn ;li-4th Cll, (•u«i>tllnrn:t<n. I u itt )oli (-••Xell.isli "»'t U'UtfAnBrilU! f'-*r tt" ncp<HnSRili»(:tln,S«nl,)fJ.hl,tj t->'-i>t.i.<|[> rro|<<t?>t')l,''l°.21S»ll>°BWIn<-<>i,i;i<VfI*n'H?r! W.i»n<r.l>-rnur,l(iinHnElMi HHltbi CA, iHAIIKrou itr«U; ^ntvrrf.'.vnln lut ItohiiCliltH&lmit- }»K,T^<iKL>:tr-:.iht»f>Eciivl IfitHii^ ^•tftt^^'n^ib^ti?:j'n'-;^.ti*re-nf>il;^r-cilt«l^ ryil^vinfio^tu^k. !. 11]H hlfh &nii)» ISIsftnll'<hRiltA^^.-c^ll1|]i|]luIEill(•<^nl(llu>•; iril;;c.iT;.i,_.jiinn.i.;.:,;<.t,,l ^:ii.'kil> fur t>-c i—'rAi^tnc. nt.'^-S^'
n.r [.ni-s,.!n! i(-.unntirt rtpl prisr* ••ilfn.its
'.F.^TO^ '•-• tx? A {:r'i^.^ ^.'i^'i
n i?./-:'a 10 <.H/.Wl>r<t 1—nlh l^t.'l.l.W.l c.;r itaian.l > J< Jhii iiun.^ojit^ <Afl| c<tii^.mciiliE;ifit-:';j-f-"r>., T.'.f^t t'^'iTTU/ <:ut) to c-'^ t^rttiii. p.iupci . l-.;i,.!hlw»K<.l .-.''rciAinliUrlly ;> h^:I» f.-wiL^e's., /<-n-.l,.,1 liin-•< HI] wly a 10 fed tft.s. i fri>-n llut.mli.lhn Di,j 0;it will ij'i'awlu.o.L-s s.-rn rt iiiiif; d t'Uiy .: it^ it.t.N^ iti-u.•i Buili,
It ,<i>lt<; .in r.sii.niiliinj; (.»d,.fllm.; >.--..!>.T<..uir t>:rxwi<b Ihtt h ».tx Ur,y> •J>in l)u- -- .•t;i;n^un Mn^-:M)?-( IA^O/T,^) t>ihcrpT':.}si:i'iL-ifi'ijaT£ !.!fik^iJ )r,25 dfttU.-pci'ECrc Th; Eh.H iy ln^^vit-7 ] Sn ^i i.ifig i]u;ri fy ;n?,<ti,.-|;nM! .Jtl|r > A. r.^ riovld: ui>- pm i-c. tjBtfr. ;ci !"'""'; :'?''";""1,I;;< "'•i'^ fw;"i."^s-bf,>inciw, iiftj:! m»Tihtord:lMrfv™wrvk< m^. i.l-illnvf/.ju.'k.n,; ui|| yturf; l.'-iA-ri .v:.h ;..olbv p.ri.iny un uwli tliu m nlr<id,'c',?;r>y..dfal, ni«ii f.rtWin<;?'lln^trfi;rcc^piii.,St:n^i>pTHi^,n,ni^^^ui^^,.il^,,,.^p;^^y^ liiS!^lu>ltln!l.tBnl<»C!ii(iK,>;,,T.:tlfa.;^.c ' .--,.... 7, n;t"Scn'<t Ll-.hiil C'.WL ,11,,'iit" ]:':<| fr,.^,;i Fii,:)i-m li iitl£!U&-.tHt'nili'ci,-.inE it (inly |f0 oui.0) th; 2(12 i|-_ir;f]irii!^nik.ii.-ilf<.iKni;;i|i-t)rau-i;^an.<;(,s]h;nhiiii Tlitrt-.Mr.f ID? ur.;l>'nj;l teti'f.lni!.! ur-sllb) ,-uull luni.-in hhi ,,f|| pr<»i_nl,\ •,^1-f : t.liVini; ipj;ii |«^ i---i. h- 1hi(niife><i<,']|.rc{cdc.;-.ull:\^gTn;,yiH;.Ty;i}dlyii'IJnaw.vAM^ niOT MS •t-.'Vhtnh [US-i ||U1 Will i!T-.:r.:y n.r.:-jK> "Siin c';|y~ tK3(h i-mmiu'nirr:
<i. P:rh'".t'in."mn-^)lri'p.s;K^<ctr.^r;? ifatli'-.p-(ijrilf>|tiU3dc<|ualcli'I.Jcnl^ Hi s".y iiKn4,l1k',ip! sn. ,:innnfn,|fl| unfKf, ,:.:• ii>;i p..yt,.|. nnj ]t(. K| R ra»,» to pimM; a.i.1 inaly;<! MI ii.cuiiw a".J ;u~.[l|lrtt P-.!;:C| iti.iflilll.T-l; !.-.« r-i t] R l'u|< ),, |)iu;|i»,: ii.,(r,H-j;a[it uixtK ini|i^^ ln\-iuL3:iL'n (if CKi.lA, Ji.-d !llC I-1 t'-t ,uy ll-m (if'ns-.^itil.'E mjt.^h n cl.-lir.lcTlh unit I'r'e l:)it'( t.nri^-;i< r.l' aluanilivn ii ,L-l;;i>-m: w,' tlic HR f.iih •.n luppcn .:! f--4'r-t'.t.ri]>i obinniijl cdikn^t. Bud it:-; t-ni.) EIR I'uk to B.lmui'.tlt xspmd I.-- I'-tilii; L.^-mit-.l v^^jp.; inulliplc mhiy •i>,ll.-.in'r,-> i;''thc LUR cnj Ci'.OA ',m rwMtuto ta 1!<1 ill! her-tin.
)fl. rnitjiinjtvTHitttoiH iui^iraproptt'idccBptL:.S;B;/!uh-.which iillieu'ilrtr^fr^nlwj form u'^a^ sclic.ninr. Mul cw-iftw- l'^Cir^"f!1iri!''a;T)on|k-Khbck<(A.iuii^i!cyldcne;-Wiu^KKtfc ii!;^:nin^^'ipAntadi)|].T,i.&.-ilnf 7c>l.V-^]i!i!teiil;apilCuaSII:,oni) liwl'oii'iil m»angtt »nulii?!iflllu» nolrift-^ cf i-tui'.ilny.iwi Efc.sdi (.'ny C.'.i-'c. rtE^KLw.i, tRd titabliihti.t aErfl4ccc(if{d|!H<li;tt? - ' '•el'l ~ ' ' ' ' "' ' '•-''•' ' . .-•: •-.:-
l't<mrVt;)'|t:,\Oasil URNVTIUSINSA'iKPRO.ItXT!
Q,.. G._^~\^
f^iiin&lUt'et
-S'l \\^ft<- '^-Cjrf-s'T^i
J^^a^^
;:ff^TiBi
:-K
.'•3ig&^
fl'fini N'r.iui!)
._*M"^_:^yc^T^±^-a
(I'tintilcn-cA'<dfL'A;l
ff'tim 6r-iilAiUmt!.^^
EmaiF Ifl 11(1 Cliy t'0ui(i>: Cily.OiunCttiijflrftiW.if from my iPhone
Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jo Romero <[email protected]>
Tuesday, December 5, 2023 12:49 PM
CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Obejection Letter-Bolsa Chica Senior Living Project
Sent
ObiM-rjon LrlWr lu HutiHMSiloa nnch CHv CdUncHnicnihcB! tl<*r Himtinctorf ;>r3tb CI^ ('otfptilisirrebtn, t y ttt >,0& ^^^..^ *mfcliliaX^^ri^^ rnt.lM^iiR.ilu (ASt.i, .<tnl.)r U,lii! C-'-sa.«lt> rmjKti.t'll Nn, liS!'21ino4a|.ir.isrfti4uSltHil1'iT; WAfrn^r^vr^pf^lnmloEfonHfr^cb, CA,^3*iyt<rvWT.tr€<t<;Wnr^r,r^,vmt(*»iri) rfebdCTikiliitnn).

I »jr^f;yoh^;*:tr*:-ihitiin-i)h.) )iifi!ii''.)^4'rn»<»^tiiu?itini^^:^iar?mi4,?^?n"t^i,)ii^vinfi<,^^ ). i iii; intr iA;ni:n tyi; jlff'- I I'j"' Ri
Mf, |U( t><
JLr i<ti,p.:i;n! tF.vun^di rsfit pr
;t^ir^.nr.'fck-s---4--<^,
•t.:1 <-.•red u t< a I'ftnlf-'-'r bc.n
•ml Htjiliiing i; t*^> mnt.f.in; jrt i'j^ ^.'^•Rit'n; ^.^•c, iAi -; '.-nn t-—.n io iiif.Wi) p<) lantk |!>1i'l:l.(>M p:< tea) ,^ t, ,1, (hi* nnn-.ln.jin v.Me-s a K.Ti'ci li;
:;ij;ht«?w-^'~<'(i--L-sly :\ ^f'} ^.-W;;;ECS.
ftt-1 l?.i;-t H< i:ij h (0 U-i t^fft (mjpCT ,
•s. (i,nlirfli-A'rot.-.-tliw.'illiMl>-,i 10 isft w.'c-tc I f[t>-n|lK^uil..t';h Oin On uill ip-awlinct.I Hun.lil.t d t.Uiy .•HrM'l.l.tH., hlk-r-<l
.<- I; i.ii'His .>]< r.Hu-inliiBj; t.'l&.tllm,.-.
•-1-l-!i..;ti;;n &;jct.,
;1J.>C-?.&:H; ^?<iT^h thjjt 1^ ^.^S '.irjc^ ':hin t3i?
.-.rtti f'wv ff.u'.] Uthtf pic.jxii. i;. h'i3 u-r '.ifn.^il |r. ;j iiftt;liinniit.i-I^t-Kn:
ft. fi~; (.TOM ;y lllui^.,1^ | S) filing K,^-l lyifl; ,j,,.-[,,,,,,t „„)„ ^, ^ pro... y.; „;,,. p^-,^ ^;H ;•(,, ^I.',',''".1! ;"'!^1"'*'1,111< F;''?'si<::! i.w-1 "••-=- I'uilniiw, afcja ivnitS n!"AI:->tj-»'.Exiwn7I« iru^.

SF.IInviT (li.-k.n, &;l | mwf.; 1^ a^.-. ».:4i .s.nthn ^,f>.iB[( un "rwttHu! ire nlKidy i-'.if.au-iifcl. T1We r>n!,-cmc^ Hiniin^flcctpii.t.,;. fi IH) rnd-'<-i|Mnl? nAcuifeo! UTiiikif ii»nn.ic,rKiicH'iyluUcpuy... liil(.,-t<Ntl> In lli!- Bul^at'liin iW.'i.:il {•:w,r '

7. ll»''S«i"<'tl.itingt\«i.-inriHl;''|!S:Kiv^.tni;:F»Miibto^^^ l?uit.MLSi2U2 ir-wnwlunk aii-lic-iijjiitKd far a.inr.-il can-(;()»|hin lull) itim—.amlRj; W3, ur.'K'nl!lh[i;iilt<lt..i •'.llllill iL'iu.-.n ^.i ..HI pK»uii.ty,\ ;KJ;-.-B 2 part-n-^ ipuci («» ?L Ibnlli.glkK i<.'i|mci:>li:':<.M]l'.'.e fn:,i'ML.-v.'tJ>il'nl;ljtlftWiv,liKi)nitlo(i(rilotsjM3l];lbuMuiwii|i mwt Hi.i K.i\,hiff: ri!s» ]l>i.l will ^-•rr.vn.r^jxl • S;uf C---1} u,^\r.
liur., ufnftKw
-irr-u.l In'fM.i K<;«1 l.-r<tC.if;ftli;zp'iiJr;l fajtn. tiiii.-nhil hnr
-.pli-i'C plLlJ:Ct itc^ftpl^
i ln'.'jftl. inJ '.k? I
atct;' idcmffi. itit.'^is, v mit.i£i;.fih^
to 'ppy^i* a.-d .fnAtyzc an Gtwti^
CI:0^,^dihcinH'<
.: HR fii|tti:'tti^li?c);i^.l|'i;atitiii'-i<nrein([ii*;^ id Vi ir«! 1 ha-C'l'Alh
Mil nf
1-3 1:<X'< fsntl^li
d.-l^mnr; M.I id? 1;IR t-,iiri o .lUppco >--i f--^;':^Mih >jlw,nnlul evi.kn.it, snd Ibs t'-.n'J EIR liils.to B:lrsjUi;tly Kip;,-; j |a t>.it.lii:u:"niii-.l «.-->•.-(ri niilll.nlti'liel ,>,-i|r.lim^c!'ll]c ^IRE>lC);.OAiUir-i-:<n;ui t.l [ill al.l llMrHI.

III. Tll^.innir.! K .t Hiunl and friiprope?j3s^Ftl;.S;KV//a[ii;.fthithii1hco'dff1rw^.nlroi fora <if&^ adi&n iiir. .iml c.;inj|inn,s U^Cir>'<il_Min'^^m)IJaelilack<tA,Mn(Mlc<Ucm^^^ ib; '/jTin\i, y.iy AnEa-1 nlenl. 7w\s f. Ten A-.fcnietcttl. ami 'da-.djfcyiri liw. re|e|fi c^>i]gu mnjiqiii DJh<? viotrjft-'i!. (•( lllH!;IHA!rl i E!e-s4?i l.'l!) Co.'.T, rt;.J;ll.pm, i-'d ciqfllh^tl sffSxwfcsl vw.tiets/" "' ", Pt<-jn.V<)'H:,\<)a.a4UfA'V"ri(l-S'IV»ASEPROJ»:C'l'!
w^^^:,M ^i^c^a.
^ iyi& II£L*I: (
'-S'< ^i\AC 'U,li-<w;
O'lilll Nr,nicl
,.--^u.^..rS:^^;^.;.i^aL-^^
/J'linIllcntsAA.Ifrt.-.'i
(Frinl Eji'.tilAiUnwt
^:^^a£i£^fia|
Email to Htl City C.'otiRd!: Cily,ruunciT.e'i?fAit»'..fct from my iPhone
Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:15 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Oppose Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project Attachments: Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project12052023.jpg Resending - prior email didn't go through
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, Decembers, 2023 1:06 PM
To: [email protected].; Robin Estanislau / City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Oppose Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project Objection Letter to Huniinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Comnnmity Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to tins project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

I. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for (lie sin-rouncling neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will ran^e from $5.00() to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This inonstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb lo the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high struclures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feel setback from the curb, tliis Big Box will sprawl over 3,5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Hunlini.Uon Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-pi'r-na'e liehemoth that is 5,4x larger than (lie surrounding structures when most other projects in HB nrc limited to 25 dwelling units-per-aure.

6. The grossly inadequate I 89 parking spaces tor 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with o.v'erflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limilecl street parh'ng in tliis preciominiintly red-ciifbcd area that is ;i major guteway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designaled for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Hor.sc that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "SurfCily'' beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("E1R") 1br this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this prqjuct; and the E1R fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the F.IR fails lo i.lisclose signiHcant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and tlie EIR~s analysis ofcumulativr iinpacls is deficient; and the ElR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the E1R fails to support its findings with substantial evidence: and the Final E1R fails to adequately respond to Public comnienl aniongyt innlliplu other violations of the E1R and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a bialant and improper alfempl lo Spot Zone wliicli is ihc oldest recognized form ofzoning scheming and con'uptinn. The City of l-lnntins'ton Beach Ificks substantial evidence to support the "findings for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Atiiendin :iu', ancl Cnnclitioiuil Use Permit amongst multiple other violations of Hiuitington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. .VOTE NO^dJ)ENYTHIS (NSAME PROJECT!
\^h ,2-3
(Signature) V^- (Date)
j^b6<± Aonj^
(Print Name)
_^°\
(Print Home Address)
^o\ C^a^ood T>r- .UtX!di^dzmih^^ii_3_2M^
rint Home Address)
c-^a\\^c\(s> ^^J-'jcc-coi
Email AddwAs^(Print Email Addi^s)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 11:47 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter to HB City Council Members
Attachments: AM Signature.jpg; My Signature.jpg
I am sending you 2 letters from myself and my wife. We vote NO and deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040.

Thank you,
Michael A Brunet
714-910-9139
Objection Letter ^ llun(inr(on »cnch < •tv rtninicilmefllN£s D^HV^SK&^h G<y ^"^"•"cmbcr., J ,,,.y<. y<>.. «. Vu^NO ,,M(I "SmLA.nfi^^1^ ^^B!lslCT:iM&1"^ L^i^'c^^^<y ^%^:i^
w!"lcf.Awn"&-HI"lti"8t»" u(-"<^ ^"^^U'ro^^^ ^^'A^i"" "••'I "<)ls;lchicnstrectL ^tTp^y^cc^;hi;'?K^^;;^t^^S^<^;;;i,^;f^'^
;m(J 1' S!l!f£(^ls^.BiyBOX Hi^.Rlsu Aprtrlnwnf U,,ilclinB i» (oo ••.u^ivv -n ^. )T<)|'<'rt'"'1 wo'lc • Jcnsitv fbrtliL- stiiwnndiny iwiKiiborlioocL '"""" """""^ .r) and f;
w
^ww^^uwnt !vnl liriccs wl" ran^ from 35,000 )o S lO.OO!) |^r nwnlh <;i> l2<),onu pur -^ Dd consideiud [o be aHbnJabic housing """c" "v"' ""'""" "" """" ^^^Sn^lSwm be 6 &toneii '"S^^a."mi£ 72 fed from Tf^ curh to ^ rooflap pa rapcl -n ^

4. StAT^f^dom<nnnt1y2^')15^^^^^
l!IJ?n:t.z^o.I-<'tli'l"vith onlva lO^^sctback'ftomfe curb, Lh>. Big Bo^vlil sprav.! over 3.? acn;s ^^lb^"liyo''1'raffiu."?^ci-^'"H^ig^ Sb'"'""" "'6''"-
~^^w^^^^^}W^^^Sm^^^ ?.4x la^nha" ihe sun'ound«!K
^cnmostotlwpn^s in HB aro limited hi 25 duelling lijnts-pc.f-acvu. 11BrosslyJnad'?qu^ '8y Pa1'ki"g ^Pac^ ^202 a]?artmcnt units do nor provide anv parkin" ^^ tor ,v'lsl,I,or''i' cllstnlll:c^ of tfic proposed ground flour tuiKiitGss^,^aad a.tiivriad ofc]8liver'. !UT-) ACi'Mce (TT.ick-.-; SpiHov'er
is c'rtrensdy
^n.ytmik uifjic Bolfta C'njca Eci>li>sucu.i Reserved
"SL-njor Living ComnmiiiCy" J;i bet for tim Rift Box is intunl.ionollv mislciuiiny as only 1"" oisl oClhe 2{ apartment un its .arc designated foraKsr.sKjc) care (lcs.:; ihanlialf). Tlic R.'maining 102 innl?, wilt k- rcnl?d to ^alvhy iidiift tenants ^^ w\] presumably i-uqiiii^? purkingspnc^iw'Diut ». lh.is Big Boxiy a pre(;,;di;nt-scttin^ Trojan Hcn-.w Lliat will allnv,-ot1i<.-r developers t:o saturat.; this area ^ ich mory Kis Ko^: ji^ji rises tiiaf Will dys^w our quiet -Surf C'ily" beach comnwnity w fan'ironmcnfcil Lnpac! Rcpori ('--EIFi") rbnhis prqieu) tiiiis foadcqiiatelv identin. ana]y..e. (T mitsgac^ the many significynt ^uviromuental impacts ofTliiA; pr^wt:. <«td th^ Ere +ail.: l.opro^•ui^• ;UHI snaly^,: ;in accurate wd,wniT![etc prolect LIes<;J'iPti(.'"- ^d di^ E1K Jails to di&ciose ^ii.nij-ii;;uit kdversu impady m'Vi^lation of c ° 'aJH dlv £TR;S ;'Mh'sis o^fimmlatfvc impact is ilyficicnti and tliu I^IR's EuialvsiKofaltem:iti\^^is icient: and th.; EU{ f.n'Jsio supporijts tiiiding;. ^jth ,*jnb.stanti;.il evidence; and tlie i-ina-1 EIR fails to adcquakslv r<:.sf)wd to Public eonnnefU: amongst-inuitip!^ otfii.T violations of the EIR and CEOAtuo luimerous to list ail herein.

10. 1^is projwt iy a blatajn. w^impropcr attempr |o Spot 7on^ wliich iy die oldest ww^iwd (uim of;^nm" schu"'?a^com!pt[a"' nlec!tyofH"nti"ylo" Beach lac^^t.stannaj cvi^nc^ro yupporttlij ::i1ndi^s" fbrZoniug M^ Aiwfuinieul, ZomngjextAjn^idiwnc, ;mri Conditiyn.)! l;se Pfnnit.imongsiinuicipk^r violation^ofHuntingt.u^Bvad) City Code, i-^ulations, we] tiSHibli^cd and ncceprcd n^cilces""'^^' '-'"'" ^.tiy VOTE NO an^n^V TIKS FiNSANE PROJECT! ' 7 ""'^""-
S6»S
(Print Name)
(Prin^i-forric.Addr,
('Prin! Gmgi; Address)
-^m Mftw
^SI©^O<T, ^(A w,
LddressT ^——t^—'—~^- —(-—-'-—-^—*-^_
^^^A-^leAlv^ul Aw-1
Email lo HB Cr'h' Coundf:mHr^.,rH.i(v-|H^,n,R«u,,^,^^|^^^^^^^^^^ ^^•^^^^_

3. 4.

5. 6.
iuctHin Lettertu IIiintiniitMriBcn^i<l;hv<'<"t"cil
^rHuffi&°gtof'LIBRnc11 city Gaitneilincmbci-s, I urge you to V^cWl nnd p^-AUEJa^atrnr ll"!^!:^ ^ ^ROseiHJukn Qicn Senior I,ivSng C™
^w!"'ner Avenue, Huntmgton Bench, CA 92649 (cross sl'rcds: Wnrncr Avciluf nnd TtrlsBChfcaFSUffict); ^^ 1 strongly object to Uiis proiectfi;>r mflhy vsilidrcascmsthatihcltidebul are nut Ilmitrd 10 tlti: Hdlimmg (jb^isiofi;,,

1. ITii^High-density Big Box High Rise Apaftmunt; Building is too massive in size, proportioiL wopd, and ^ ^ clensitylbrthcsiin-oundinsiiuigl-iborhood. - ^

2. Thv proposed aparln^ni tent. ^ws will ]™g^ from ^5,000 to $10,000 per monlli (.'i'12<>,Q.<)Opdr war) and A.

Opt, considered to be affordable housing
ThisnioiuitTOsity will be 6 stories Ingh'mcasuring 72 ie.st from Uie curb to flw rooftop parapei in it riL'ighburfiood ofpredoniingiitly 2 .slon.- liigti slTiic.LuKS.

Built On a Zero Lot line witli oulv a lO'fcL-l yulbuuk from the curb. this. Big Box. \vill sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy niajnr traffic .inlcracction in 1-luntington Be.ach- It ftill be ati astonishing 09 (hveHiug uuits-por-act-e behemoth tha.i is 5.4x larger thau the suiroyndtng structiu'es when awst other projuu Is in HB arc limited to 25 dwC-Umg uniT.s-pur-acrc, The grossly inadequiilc 1 R9 parkuig spaces foi-'2ft2 aparLmeiit IHUI.K do nol provide an'..' paiking spaces !br nsitors, customers oi'Uit; proposedI gt-oiind floor businesses, and a myriad of ddivery and si?mcu 1-fucks^ Spillover parkim., wiU saCnraLD Oiu aTca v/itll overflow parking on strcv.t.s tliat ani alrcad)' overcro'.vded Tnen; iscxlrc.me.lv linriicd stre.-rt;i>a(klng in this pTsdoinmantly red-uuTbed area dial: is a niaicn- gaiL'.way to ihv. public hiking, trails in Lhc Bolsa Chica.Bco1ogii:<il Rysm've- 'ITie "Senior Livinu Communily'' Ifibel forfln's Big Box is infcnLiomUy misleading as only 100 uut oflhc 202 apartment uniLs are designated for assisred carc (less tlian ha.lf), The remaining 102 uTiits w\\ bu Knied 10 wca.lthy adult iw;ml» whu will pre&iu-iiably rcqiure 2 parking spaces per mut.

This Big Box h a prci'edenf.-sett.ing Tm^n Horse, thai.will allow olhur develorcft to saturate ihis area will mow Biff. Box high nscs that will d^lruy OLU-quiet -'Surf Cm'" bcuch commiinily. l). The Envu'omneiAal Impact Report ("--KIK") for this project fails to adequately identify- anah-n;, ur nuttgate- ths many sifcmificiint e.nvironmuntal impacK <)ftlii& prqjvcl; suid the Rlt< fails to providu Md ana.lyzc an accuraie ATKJ complete projvct descriptiun^ and ?c ^TR iatts to <ii.^losc si&.uificunt advers? imp^'ts m yiol^on uf CEOA: and the KI.R's aualvsis ofcimiuladvc iiupa.cts is deficient; and thu EIR's analysi& ofaltemati\'(--s i& d'eficicnt and ihe E1R. tails'to snp]x)rt its lindings with snbsl;inlial evidCTc.;; and the Finnl_KTR; fails 10 adcouately respond l.o PnbJic commenl airton.gst Tn.ulliple olher ^'iyldtions oftiie H.1 K and CEQA loo numerous to list a.U herein. ........ .. . , ,. .. _ ..

10. This'pmiwt-is a blatant and impropyraftempih) Spot Zone ^yhicb is file oldest ^cognized form^fwnusg yciiCTnngaT^">mlption- The 'City ofMuntingtonBcsmh lacks substmiml^vidctice to suppyrt i^-finclmgs" 7,
s.

Please V;
(Signatu
for'ZotS'Map'Anwndme.nl, ZoningText. ^Vn-icndment, and Gonditional Use Pemul .miouast nniluplc olb>--r viohttiorisofHudtmyton Beach City Code, njgulations and cst;tb1ished and acwplcd practices. )TE NO ami DENY TH7S WSAiNJ? PRO.IECT!
W^^ (^(MUJ^
-jMt-^-M^y^—- —
(Date)
(Print N&nw)' ^ ,/ . ,-7 ,. /--i
'^s_(_a^±^^-J^^-JS^^^aiit/
(Pnnt HQrae Address) ^
^j^h^^ttA^i^^^^,- _.
(Print Email Addiuss)
Email ^WGityCpunuh atv.C'ui<""<^»t'rtH;v-!1b-ur"- ""hin.i^niiiisian^Siii'l'cilv-iit.j11- ^ ^ :"\]
Fikes, Cathy
From: Glenda Mercado <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 11:02 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Letter of Objection to Proposed Senior Apartments on Warner/Bolsa Chica Attachments: GMercado.Letter of Objection.docx
Attached is my signed Letter of Objection to the Proposed Senior Apartments on Warner/Bolsa Chica in Huntington Beach.

Obiection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^^^~December 5, 2023
(Signature) (Date)
Glenda Mercado
(Print Name)
16892 Coach Lane. Huntineton Beach. CA 92649
(Print Home Address)
G7LENDA(%gmail.com
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

John Boydston <[email protected]>
Tuesday, December 5, 2023 6:26 AM
CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Estanislau, Robin
Bolsa Chica Senior Living Project
scan0022.pdf
Please reconsider the current plan. WAY TOO high...

John Boydston
Realtor, GRI, SRES, e-Pro, CMS, CPS
Lic# 01522144 | (714)642-2257
[email protected]
johnboydston.firstteam.com
0@®0®®©
FT^am. UP
LUXURY

PORTFOLIO
INTERNAT10MAL'
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Counczlmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Livixig Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Waruer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback fi-om the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major trafiGc intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-aci-e.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box higli rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate tlie many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provi4e and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EBR. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices, PleasgJOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
/^/r//^^^
(Date) /
(Print Name)
/V7^^ Z)c?^6^^ ^-^-^r //r/^- 9^^ 7.
(Print Home Address)
^^^€>^ys^^/^(^^l/^/^--/-^<;^. /<^^~
(Print Email Address) —'
Email to HB City Council; [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Jane Deemer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 7:19 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Opposition Letter to Project SCH No. 202210040 Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Dear Huntington Beach City Council Members,
I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. This building will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures..

3. Parking seem inadequate.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS PROJECT!
Jane Deemer 12/4/2023
(Signature) (Date)
Jane Deemer
(Print Name)
17136 Courtney Lane_
Huntington Beach 92649_
Fikes, Cathy
From: J <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 4:11 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Letter of Objection of Bolsa Chica Living Center Attachments: Letter of Objection 05Dec23.pdf
Hello,
Please see attached subject letter.

Thank you,
Jeremy
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. This 6 story building will stick out like a sore thumb in a neighborhood of predominantly 2-story high structures.

3. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

4. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

5. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate tlie area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

6. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

7. Tliis Big Box is a precedent-setting TROJAN HORSE that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

8. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

9. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

PJdise VOTE NO ytd DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
/¥r-/-^-
(Date)
<-l--Cr6/^c/ ^S7/fc^J~
(Print Name)
^6^ QC^^^ ^-. /T^^y/, •<^-< C/^^^c^
(Print Home Address)
(£f r^>u~c3 ^\<-s c^y J^-s/y-cr
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Diane Schultz <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 5:52 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter for Project SCH No.2022110040 Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Council Members.pdf Members of the Huntington Beach City Council,
Please Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project
SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972Wamer Ave, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649. (Cross Streets: WarnerAve. and Bolsa Chica Street.) I have read & signed the PDF/Letter attached to this email wherein 10 reasons were stated that caused me to respectively request that you Deny Approval for this project.

Thank you for your consideration,
Diane Schultz
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny^A.pproval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major b'affic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow-parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises -that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR s analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^L^^c^J^ _ l^-/G/^0^3 .
(Signature) " ^ \Dat&)
D/^-NP SCHtvr-s-
(Print Name)
Co%<^ l-oyoL^ t)^»y^ HON'fi^o^-o^ ^(n^. C^. <?^^S'7
(Print Home Address) • <J "/
^/A^&Sc^u/^e- ^l<fP l/^z-fl/s/. /^&T
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 8:16 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Cc: Eunice Rebello
Subject: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers against Project SCH No. 2022110040
Attachments: scan0017.pdf; scan0016.pdf
O.hjt'i.'lidii\ .fiLri'JoJ1" ll(in?> toil Bcacli (.'itv C'ouncilmenihers Di.'iir llu[itini;t(in Utin'h ( it? ('uiinrilnn'niln'r*.. I urv.c ? "" In ^''ltl• M> -irnl U£l!'i_A.ft|!"!l;U lur tlic [inipnin! Hntta i'liicu Sfninr l.iving <'L-nnniunil.v I'rujrctSt II Vi, .Ui.!21!(MMI) lin'nd'il nl Wl niiil t'^72 \\;trnfi'An-nur. llunlinnlon lii'ncli, <"^- 'Wi^ icrrmii'Ut'l.'.: tt iinii:! Atcnui* iinil B<ih;i Ctin'n ,Stn't-0, I •,l.rril:J> nl-iL'Ll In tln» I'nnj'-cl lnr m;-;\v •,ii|i>| [L-;|?..-.|IS llnil nr;;inl'>' but ti:v lir'l lmnt>.,l |i'-rili'' !r.ll..''',li;[.i,'.i>l'JL-i.lii-'n-;:
. I hi- !li.^l,-.l\'n;..il;. Hi^; I'ii". I lij'ii l<i?.i; \;'..i..'t]']H:lil HiiilJ.inL' i-. !'ii> m.]:-:-i\'-' in -:j/i.'. pni]\ir;irii. •.r.ifi.', -i.i'.i |.I..'IT-:I.'-. K'I lli>; :.'.irri.''nn'.lu'iy lnit-lil'i'l.i'.'n'.l

2. I b--' pr..'ii-ni:.L-J up^-Lir.i.ni n;ni. |'ri..-r. '.'.ill 1.111.^' ;'-<nn S-;.uf.-i^>Slli.''nm [IL'I n;inli'.(SI-!tii.<illit r<.T.'.''.n i ,nl.l i< w I r.,'ii-;iilcii--il 10 l'i.-.i3'ln;'-.f;il'k' hl.''u^i[ii;.

3. Tlii- inor-jni-,!!', r ili '••; I'l •,(m-i^ hi .'l-i I<K'>I:<'|T]H.' "-' l.;^'i. lr;''ir II'.'; i.'url1 I'l tiii'- (n.>l'tn[' [\i;.ir'-'^ in -1 nrn;lil'""ilnv'J m |'r'.:J;ii'nin:i nl.'. .'' s'.i'r. huh ;tni<;tur';:..

4. Fliiiil '.'.n .1 /ci>- I ,'.t li.i..' MJUi "n1;. .1 KI t;.;..;. sdl'.Kl. li""i ill.' .:'i-l', lrii- Hi;; H.i>. •'•.ill •..'•i.i',', I "•^•r-''.;• ..n.n-". i;[invj!ns; r !"'ir.'-. ln.ii.n ll.lllii; i;nn -•-••-•( ;rn in lliu'r.nr;l'.'.n H'jrn.h. ?<« I' '.'.ill lit .III ,i:l"ni'.li!|l.."'''. \v. c- II IV' uisil.,-fi;-i--,>.L.rL- l-(.'ln;inti|l;iti..il i-. 5,:f.\ U'-i.i tlnni lli.' -i i:iin>iil'.u;> '.Ihicnir,;- '',hi;n r.n'st •.''thc-l rnri-i.'!:- ;n 1JH ;n\' lir.iil'.'J FH .''5 iiti,;llinr. ifnil-.-j'ct-,ii:fL'. [5. I '-if L'lu:-.1.!'. ir..hJ<;i|i]iUr I .S*' r..i •l.ui;' •.)'.n:r. liit ''ii.'' ;i|i;nlniL-iti np.it-, >:•.' j;nt pun i.t; ^ili:'. [\irt.m;; ;.!',l>v- Irr •> Mlnr.-. i.ijnl.unLi:; iil th'j |irnFi.<-^.,: ,i!im]inl ll.'-.'i l'1.]'.jrn.-.>.\:'.. ,i-r.!:.i rr.ri.nl nl'..L-li'n.'n .iii.I.-.-'ritt.; in.t.i,'.. *'^iJ|i.r,'.T ]i.i?l..!ll^ "ill ;.Mll,ll,lr.i.' Hi.' ;lti.'.:. '.'.illl ir'.rl IInU |'i.l4.ill.' IH1 :-.ir';].'l'-; lll.ll III'.' .lEp.'.id,', nn'ri.'nmi.lfil T Inn.' r,r--.:rr.;HKS\ lil'i]ili:.,l s":'-..'i p.ii'-jri!; iii ti;];-, pii;i.lti];lil;;nill;, r..\l-i,-tuli.;'J ..IK':I Iti.il i'.;i ri'.^'ll i.'.'ilc',\u; tn tin.'j-'ntil-i. li.l.iii? n.iii'; ii) liu l'-ri;.:jl Im-'.i s:'.'ti|i.ij;ii.-)l l.:..:";'t',t'.

7. HIL' ';-.Llnio['J.iMi'iU i.'ninninnii.--" l.i'.-'.'l t'.'.i llir. llii: H<-'>. i-. intt'in:i]inl;\ |),;.;;\:;]i.lhip .r. nnl', 1;"1 nnl nl lii. ^'.'' .i]\iHnKiHi.riU;.,iK A'.<i;n,ik... lnr..r.:-i-|r..l i;.i:.; ll.>'<:' ili.m li.illl I IIL' s.-fluinin.' I n; unit:, v, ill h.; n.n'.iJ li.i 'i'.i,',il"r, jil'.ili i,:n.n';l-, ..ilir .'.ill piL-.-.nni.il'.l;, (.•..;UI[L' 1 p.iilvi']; ••; ,H;L'.'n'r'inil S. 1||:.-, [i,l!. l^.'.. i.,;l|Hl--L\',lLII,l-M-H!H;1 llv.i,n;lln-:i.t(li.H niil.ll!..'-.'. "llK'i j!.",,'!")'.,"-, |.. .,rm;<l..'llii'; ;iH.'.i » Uli r.l.u'i-' Kir l;;ri\ hr.li [i'.i.", lli;sl r.i'l ..!;...lnr. 111,1 i;|i.iiL'i ".Siii'~l it'," >v;i;li urnnnnuul;, y. il'jL- 1-n'i iivit'nnen:.il liiip.iLl K.i.-[\''it |"l:IK."l ft'.r lli;'. ]'m':ii.'i.l I'.til' i.n .u.!,,i|ii,i!i.-i'\ i,I.iili!\. .m.il>/..'.i.n iniiij.r.i.' tl\' m:i;n •.i:'iiil-.L';u;l fir. ii-niifliL'm.il h;i|iucl-.cl llii'. pri.'iL'L't: diri',>u. Ill'; l.i!;'. ]..i ['nr.i.l. ;nnl ;m:>l:..^ ;in .K'CIH-.I-.L' ,in.J i.-niTipli.'l..' cn:i|./..i ilt-':...iij'lr.'l'i, ,in'i i'l..' 1 |i< l';.il', :i-i,li'..;En-'-'-.i.iinilii.'Kiil..n|i,^i>.^ mi|\n-l-; n. >',r,>l,i'i';in't ('l-i.i.\: ;nni ;ln; 1-:[R':^ .111.1!;.:,]- n!'.;u.i]til:m\<.. !inp,n;h H i.li.;1i.'i,'l!l; ;',iiil ll"- 1:F;?.''. .in.il.'.-i- ..>t'.il!t;rn,Ui',---;» i.. .Ji.'ll.;n'nl, ..i;iii iln' I II-' l',iil\ ru -.H|.|ui; I jrh 1i 1-1.1, lii''< ''I'ilh ..uli:fl,.nl];il c; iilLin:.-'. .isi.l U:.' !l'in;'.l 1'IR 1'ii'i:' In .nli-t|Ll.i].-'h r.j-p.ip.il l" i'nl'li.; i.'..>i:nruil .ifiii'.n^ri irmliirli.' ollr" •, i.ii.'.li^'ii?; ,i]'ilu~ I'.iH ;iilJ l'l:i,>A ks-i in.nu.-p.'u:', :ll lr,I.J:l )'.;t,:in
. 11 ii:i |n>']^'-i I-.ii I'l.n.in: i.iii.l i.ni|';['i|'L-ralt;i!i|ii h' sp..'1/f.ni.- •iiliii.'li i; (|i.;i':i.L -.l r'.-;nrH!.\'..l I'm in i ••> ',•'•. ui 111 - ..•.•llit-i;iiU!; ,n',.l >;rn],|iiinn JlK-f.it'. i..t lli;riiin:j^.'li li.j,ii;l'. ln.l^-.!;b-'(iinlul i.".i.l. n.>' In -.iii-.|>,.n ilic- "liinlnu'^' I'/.r '/'wny Mnp .\nn.'u..iriH.'r.l, /(.mn:;! if,l .\;ir.'H'.ii!i>.':H, .n',1 < '.;.mlii;r,isil I 'M. I'l.'riiiU .mnini.^t nml";|'tr ;.l|r,'l •> irlilliiill'. nl'llll.nin.r.l.Hl P.i:,li.:ll ('iH i.'ml._, fcr.n .iilhinf. .iii'.l fstiihli-li;--;-nii.l >i>;>;>.'|itt:.l pi..n'li.'i.". rk'iw van; NO ymi l>^:^^ w-< i\v.\\h n<().ii'',( i i
^^ ;Z' '""/^iK""'': /^/^'.ss
i;-^n.mn\" il.i..it..-l
^.w/c^ A:' ^=^£=U_o£w^£ /^' /^^£<
•,!'ri;il Njiii'jl
1 .r°
^
f
rs-
t^
1^ t!1^ 1^y^l^1]
"v.
•3C ^ C-., 'Jt
^ <Q
f^:

K] \~1
'•••^-
\r\^c
?>
s
^
p.
1^
.•*\
^
^'
\^
r\
s-
<&
p
!,'>.-
^
ex
^J:'
c\
^\
^
i^rrll
r», ; •- 5---;' =
:: ^ ^ ? 'r.
/' = ~: r-i ~
^
^ ?t^ ^& ^
ir^
ir^
b
^ - ? = =
V" '=• s- ; ^
k^? 1=1
fvi^ii
r^'^f-'i |e
[Nt 111
.sIt^<
^^s
L^
'& ' t-
?T .=:' >
^ •^ ''J: s^- '^
g
r/
(•^r —
/:
'- ^ =
Ei 5 —
"\ y
—
'^ ^~ =;'
1 3 ~.g
•l^.2 fc
=" = =: e I?
2 2 ?='
y-
|i-
fe
~? T- •" . ..^ =: - ^ ^ -p-
= =• ^ ~ ^ _ = ^ ^- =- =• s 1^- ;:: 'r:

S 1 S" ^ ; ?c -•': £' Z ? 3" 2 ^ ; § 5 ^ =•
^.
'k» —T
c *>-
2' ii
f 2 ^
= '- 5 3
5 a S- fc-
I 't 1 i I
I'll' t
^ =.

Si •=.-*.
/' ~; ^ E~ ?::'- -'^ "* ~ -' ^ ''- ^
/ .- ,— ^r— ,, _ ^. ^- — —•
•J -^ C. t'^" •^ .- ^ r^— ?'~il -_
I- /
" ^g
^ 1^
t^f |/'
'r. 2 !=•
Fikes, Cathy
From: Bernie Rochman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 3:49 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Letter
Attachments: imgOOI.pdf
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach. ..

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan H&rse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in'Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

E;ase VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
(Signature) / / ^ _ ~(t)a^
ocHM^/}!
(Print Name)
^/^o iiaL^- ^>^ i/t ^6 . C/
(Print Hom^Adcfress) / /
G./toz , R^-W/l^^hoc . C?'y^)
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Steve Shea <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 7:38 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: New construction
y^'^fP
\A/ h a P ^ ^'
f' e-^e ^
Dear Huntington Be?
proposed Bolsa Chic;
Warner Avenue, Hui
I strongly object to thi

1. This high-density
density for the sur
Fikes, Cath}
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Noa slayback <[email protected]>
Monday, December 4, 2023 9:38 AM
Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Objection letter to H.B
^leaisaJ^le'- <o Hu«;dit2t»<i B<*ch chv Cdundlntontea
^ttm^w^^c^c"'hdttw*1^?- t"wy"t*V8alffl«^fiBaABIBiS8!<<»lte Ipop-td 8*to CUn SrtKr t.WaaCa.uiudly rn»t«-SCH K», i»,!t)1wS1SS3".Tm,l'.»fl4Tn W*f»n^^V^^!l^ScK^C^nM^ttWttm^WwsUA'^ I
liraitly objwj B> ihii pwijtet hi mssy nlid naiura; iha inctaie liul •re not lanfttd w tflii ftiltea'iageAjediom:

I. Thitkitlntnmly Hlg -Isws Hlgli Ws: Apauwu Beiy-'ns i< too n-iaiiwi In tilt, propcaAm. x.(i>c,«nit ikwity for Iht tunmmding arijihlmhosd,

1. nieixiipwal^opM^Frtoav^m^ftt.w^.CW
estdiaiidawjlobcafKmJii-.teiwaing. - . -
3, VtW OKUSWHJI'/ V/W I b? 6 slodcsa Uiili tiicumricg Tl (ist &c<n IhB cuA 1& tbt nxiflisp lunpct In a BdsU-oriSooij ofprcAnmnaB(l}r,2 i.l'wy luBfc i.lnucsu-
4, Bmll en »ZCTO Lo! HIM; wish ncly> !» ?(« sdi.&A frsai itst tnm, dsii Big Bui mji ipnnl ost? i.S tm-, CTWdlaglb.tf/ ituJOF tr.lBik-nucKtttiw; Jn Hsataigsn) &»d.

S, II wilt te •inuSBuuhingW (bid&ig onlct-jie-acre iaActaolti Stud u ^,<x Itfscf ifain dw nuTOUnd^e >BW!U(C« u-ben rturi MI)CT linij-STii in W\ u< Simtal to 7i itn'etling tnii(»-l«i-&3s. fi. The jfaiify inaitHpulc I 89 [ijui.inj! syKt* fvt ^2 tyianwK u-ntt do not prov^le imy sutfc'ug ipacc* fw tfaftnn, ciitludm pfihe jsopwal itioiimi fsxt baawsw, *cil a tnyrad «?i!^i'>er) u«3 scmu (nRta- SpiEliWT [MrittJlii W(U »(tl!M<: ihc ma mA (n CTIIQW puiAigtin i.ltrtd ibu m: alrtmly o-rteniwdni. Tfairt te. nttnnely Jiniiicd iifristpirkmg m |hli rfpio'-.Tnirdy fnj-cnrtiHi *tE» Ihii ts • msjft tHcnny to the puKii:
hiking iraili in (If; Bota Cliica l:i:i)2o(tlut P.asaw.

7. Th? -SCTUBI Livtag Cwiumtaiy" lAcl fo tha Big ft.i; i< 4nwsiwulty minding M caly lOOKilofdw 202 tpartlWRl Umliare duiIgiuKd hf UttdciScafc (ICtl i-ajt bdO. The itntun.ing 102 ital* wil b< (Eitcd (a •wcthhylnlt lcmat-t w+d wtll pcttiumably impin; 3 pAing spatct pw nnu- 8- TIlit Big Bfli. It ii pfWnlfnE.iflli.lg •t'ioju Mortc liwt >viS| nUuw ci&ct dn clopCTi (d ifl-JrsH! Ihti UCT »»Tlh matc.Vt^ Box tMgii ra»< liul »llLt)atmy ntir qod "Surt'Cily" bc*dl t«r-ucia--iiy.

9. The Enriwwiaaat ImpKi REport ("E4H") kf &H. pq«ct fallj u 8<i<q>ulely SAHAify, »n»!yw. vs oilt>-g»&! tte uwly HgeilK-ml mkKoaRWliul iapaelii flf fau pr*j«<l md die lilR faOs lu pnn^iit and uialyrc sitc<unlc tad toffipfete prqjbrt ilscriplKin; mid l!u! F.IR tuh to discSosc sip)il!<sial ntlTcw; imfacte fai Viobtion nr CEQA: mid da RIR'» usilyss ofaunuliHHt HtfMS B dcttctaa; uid thi: KM.' j .Balytis o^alsaislim B itriWEBt; ami Ac (U R fail* lo wpport ils niaiicgt wii& sulntandtl tvidqicc; kflil lb< Piiul HIR Euk to tttfrytrtciy rtayood ta PiAt? sflintncia aaaesK maliyte othct vi<Anaiu isfltsc fc.m *al CEQA toomunCTe'a< utlKtUhuria.
«, ThitprojwU«iytlaM»w!h^nipwaUCT^i»SpWZ^cuWi Istteold^rcwgrf^ Khnttifi^ tad corruption, TIic Giiy of I luminyoa BCTth '«<** abtiactlid vndwM vs inpjiort vbs -fadasg»" fprZomng M«(i AmauSnKHtrZiui»g Tpd Aniet^aiau, *ail CewUtinial U»i t'auttuiBigrt icwltipfc nay, vfoWona orHmitingNKi B<ai:1»Cny C°*i rtSiiBun!*. and Mlayiibttl fwt a^vtfftd practiw. phvt van.KO uid uEh'v •niis INSANE fRojEL'ri
"3
-izlkhca^
,^^iil^te?teoj-'k
10*li:)
|i2b£lft^b&^^^^^
Sent from my iPhone
Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 4:09 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Deny Approval for High Rise Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project Attachments: Huntinton Beach City Council 120423.pdf
Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers.

Please Vote NO on the proposed High Rise Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project.

Attached is my signed request for you to Vote NO.

Tom McGreevy
T&M Banana Company
Objection Letter to HyntingtQn Beach City Comicilmeinbers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ApDroval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($]20,000 per year) and is nut cunsidered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories liigh measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3,5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. [t will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded, There is extremely limited street parking in Ais predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Bux high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("ETR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts iu Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein,

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and cormption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other ^onsjo^itontmgton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. reVOTE NO an^DENY TiyyiNSANE PROJECT!
^r^-Tv^,//.///!.^^^^- ^-^J
(Signature) ^ '^' (Date)"
T^^^ ^ ifi^/^^\i
(Print Name) - - . ^
^?y Sci^ir. ^ ^^ ^7/M'^Z^fc// ^- ^^ ^
(Print Home Address)
m^f^flr^/^- ^-fiffL.C-ffH
(.Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Craig Bohi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 4:44 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL.CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Council Members 12.423.pdf Please vote NO on this project.

Craig Bohi
Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Bcacli City Councihnembers, I urge you to Vote NO and I)cnx_Al)Hr°Yal for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
1^1_^^013
(Date)
(Print Name)
S{}^0y^\c.^ ^ ^W^-h^ ^-.^ ^^- 9^^^^
(Print Home Address)
r. Co, io» to oi\ f<»3 y^ ^i o^. ^t? •<»?
(Print Email'Xddress) /
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Janet Jacobs <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 6:17 PM
To: Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection letters to City Council
Attachments: Letter to HB Council Pt l.pdf; Letter to HB Council Pt 2.pdf; Letter to HB Council Pt 3.pdf Attached you will find 22 letters from residents objecting to the Bolsa Chica Senior Lvg project. Please post these for the 12/5/23 City Council meeting.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Thank you.

Janet Jacobs
[email protected]
714-401-3555
Virus-free.www.avast.cpm
Objection Letter to Huntinffton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the followmg objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stones high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story lugh stmctuies.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with ouly a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an. astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than fhe surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor busmesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

7. The "Senior Living Conunimity" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EUR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and fhe EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zonmg schemmg and comiption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

PIgase.VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
G-^J/^— _ /^o-^(Date)
(Print Name)
\W\ ^€?^L\r7jn ^rr- ?^^ ^-.^
(Print Home Address)
T,
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Councfl: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City CouncUmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the followmg objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood,

2. The proposed apartment rent prices -will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity wiU be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood ofpredominaatly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling uaits-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Lhdng Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse fhat will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that •wi\\ destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the E£R fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EDR. and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
0^ ^v-^ _ II/ .^^/^^.s(Signature) ' (pate) /
0^-0 ^> '(£-(S> ^^J,
(Print Name)
(-7^4^ 6^- 5^^- , SiA^%^^i , ,",4-
(Print Home Address)
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that mclude but are not lunited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling imits-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Living Community"" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

10. Thds project is a blataat and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and con-uption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach.City Code, regidations, and established and accepted practices.

Pleas&^OTE NO and DEJ^YT^HIS INSANE PROJECT!
Hjw^^ i/cmc
(Signature
Lu'3wof '^Q^ckak
mc/7^3 S-/&?^/^&%2^^
(Print Hom^Address) ^-~\ ,
Hync^koi^^^n^^ ^^7
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: City.Council(©surfcity-hb.org, [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntmston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councihnembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Boka Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to fhe following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line -with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huatington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth fhat is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate fhe area with overflow parking on streets that arc already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community'" label forthis Big Box is mtentionally misleading as only 100 out offhe 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that vnll destroy oiir quiet "Surf City" beach commumty.

9. The Enviromnental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts m Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and fhe EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is fhe oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO asd DgNXJTHIS INSANE PROJECT!
A//A3
(Signature) "^ (Date)
A^^
(Print Name)
(Print Home Addres/s)
fL^n ,Af^.^. \y ^c'/ ^i^u^vv^^
3)
y^^f^/(S L^^a/L c^^
(Print Email Address^
Email to HB City Council: City.Council@surfdty~hb.org, [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Councihnembers» I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chxca Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntmgton Beach, CA. 9264? (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project &r many valid reasons 1hat iacluds but are not Umitsd to the followiiig objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surroundmg neighboAoocL

2. The proposed apartment rent prices mil range fi-om $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.
3, This monstrosity -will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet fiom tiie curb to fhe rooftop parapet in a neigliboAood ofpiedommanfly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be aa astonishing 69 dwelling vmits-per-aciebehemoliiAat is 5Axlaigerthaatiae smroundmg • structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parkmg spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a mynad of delivery and service tmcks.

Spillover paikmg will saturate the area with overflow parking oh streets that arc already overcrowded. There is extenely limited street parking is. tfeis predoiumsutly red-cuibed area fliat is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Conmnmily" label forthis Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setiing Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that •wfll destroy our quiet "Surf City"' beach, coimnumty.

9. The Environmental bnpact Report ("EBR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate tiie many significant ec.yiroBineBtai impacts of&is project; and fee EIR feiis to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and 1fae EGEtfaiIs to disclose significant adverse impacts in. Violation of CEQA; aad-fhe EIR's aaalysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and •{he EGR.'s analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with. substantial evidence, and the Fmal EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple otfaer violations of the EIR aad CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City^o£EE$mtmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "fmdiags" for Zoniag Map Amendment, ZoMrtgJbxitAmendmeirt, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other )lations ofHuntiag)joi(d5eaSfc<Qity Cbd§( regylati^s, and established and accepted practices.

TPIeasfeWTE N^a^d^ENY Tfia@ DSS^E PROJECT!
(Signature)
(Print Name)
^/n<^\^^h^
^
Wv]^ \)aAfJ^^ ih ^lo) ^ih^QTh. ^1
CPrint Home Address)
it Email Address)
h. ? 3^- r j/^ A (L4^d^. ^^r^-
w^-
z?
Email to BGB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Coundlmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ADorovaI for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-denshy Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportioiL, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monsb-osity -will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood ofpredominanfly 2 story high structares.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling umts-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x laiger fhan the surrounding stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking ia this predominantly red-cuibed area that is a major gateway to the public luking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Conummity" label for this Big Box is intentiojoaUy misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half) . The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenaats who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area \vith more Big Box high rises that -will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach conunuoity.

9. The EnviroiBnental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate tiie many significant environmental impacts of this project; and fhe EIR fails to provide and analyze an accmate and complete project description; and fhe EBR. fails to disclose sigmficant adverse impacts m Violation of CEQA; and the EER-'s analysis of cumulative unpacts is deficient; and the ED^'s aaalysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings vnfh substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recogni2ed form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support fhe "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Pennit amongst multiple ofher violations ofHuntington Beach. City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS mSANE PROJECT!
/2l^-t4^ ^Ct^. ________ \ Z-CA-3S.
(Signature) (Date)
Mow P^|
(Print Name)
_mi-
(Print Home Address)
_^y\\ ^{f^^ tr. i ^-\wm</l^hn <?f^k r^ c{^1^
(Print Home Address)
Q^c^c\\^>^\ AC(^\W( \. Cw
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City CouncB: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntmgton Beach City CouncHmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ADurovaI for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Bmlding is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density fertile surrounding neigbborhood

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affoFdable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to tiie rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line wifh only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It vail be an astonishing 69 dweUmg units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x laiger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly madequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking vriU saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in. this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for fhis Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out offhe 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaimng 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach commumty.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR- fails to disclose signi&caat adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficieirt; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with. substantial evidence; aud the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple ofher violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach, lacks substantial evidence to support fhe "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zonmg Text Amendment, and Condidonal Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
(Signature)
^VSr^ Cr/A^
-?^
)at$)'
(Print Name)
\3^ ^^x^'^y, i-Wr^l2)/^
(Print Home Address) ^
^v^-v. o\A^ a ^A^^^^
~-3^3 (Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Coundlmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density forthe surrouading seighboifaood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet fi-om the curb to tiie rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high staictures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback fi-om the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling umts-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than. the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling uuits-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customeis of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service tmcks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets fhat arcs already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predommaatiy red-curbed area that is a major gateway to fhe public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Coimnumty" label forthis Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants -who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach commumty.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate fhe many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and fhe EER. fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in. Violation of CEQA; and fhe EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and fhe Final EFR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming aud corruption. Tbs City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple Other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NQanri TW.NYJHIS INSANE PROJECT!
,2 -3 -2-.>2,
(Signature) (Date)
^((LH^S> T^
(Print Name)
^// ^11-ft etf' b.^ H-u.^^ J^c^ /^ ^^f
(Print Home Address) U y
T(^£r^-77W 5 <^> ^A^/^-- ^/-/
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Councfl: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Councihnembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chxca Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the followiag objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density &r the suirounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices \viU range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet j&om the curb to the rooftop parapet m a neighboAood of predominantly 2 story Iiigh stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line wifh only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box wiU sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy majortraffic intersection in Huatingtoa Beach.

5. It will be aa astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre liehemofh that is 5.4x laigerthan the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parkmg will saturate fhe area v/ith overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking bails m fhe Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Semor Living Commmuty" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setdng Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that -will destroy OUT quiet "Surf City" beach commumty.

9. The Enviromaental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EER's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and fee EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple o&er violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and conuption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE ?^Q and JO^NY TfflS mSANE PROJECT!
IY-M-Z3
(§^iatdre)"" ""-" (Date)
ILunrY f^\W
(Print Name)
\f?5
(Print Home Address)
\^ft55,^»\4\$vc^n$vvnqx) L\n -^-ans
^_^A \\^ a} nsnl Omm
(Print Snail Address)
EmaU to HB City CouncU: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Counciknembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Boka Chica Street).

I strongly objectto this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding aeighboAood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet m a neighborhood ofpredominanfly 2 story high sbructuies.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line witfa only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling umts-per-acrc.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parkmg spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and amynad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking win saturate fhe area with overflow parking on streets fhat are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-cmbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.
7, The "Senior Living Conunumty" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaming 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Troj an Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beacli community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate tiie many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EER fails to provide and analyze aa accurate and complete project description; and fhe EIR fails to disclose signi&cant adverse impacts ia Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis ofcumuladve itnpacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; aad the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This proj ect is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest lecognized foim of zoning scheming and conuption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Peimit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntmgton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
(Sig^dre) (y
'^M^eQ^Jr}s^k^^ Ou-iv &'^or<2.
(Print Name) / /
,4255 'ffl^/e^ LW€ ^^^. c^
(Print Home Address)
u/rly^J ^o r^, cSOC03 y/7^o0 . r r-^.
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Coundhnembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-densily Big Box High Rise Apartment Buildtag is too massive in size, proportion, scope, aad density for the surrounding neighboAood.

2. The proposed apartaient rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, lids Big Box wiU sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishmg 69 dwelling units-per-acre liehemofh that is 5.4x larger than the suirounding stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly madequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any pariung spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service tracks.

Spillover parking vnll saturate fhe area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking ia this predomiaantly red-cuAed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Conmiumty" label fbrfhis Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less fhan half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who wiU presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. Tbds Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" lieach cominumty.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EtR") for fhis project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and fhe EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the ElR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.
10, This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is tfae oldest recogmzed form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support fhe "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoniog Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations^fHuntington Be^ch City Code, regulations, and established aad accepted practices.

Please^Qte NO wW?7rHSS INSANE PROJECT!
^A/ '%/^?y
(Signature) ' /• " r ' (E»ate?i
(Prmt'Name)
mm S ffvAr. M, J^T^W, r^- W^
/ / (Piint Home Address)
Bi^ta Wl6> ^ahoo,
(PTfnt Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ApprQyal for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the followmg objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighboAood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per montfa ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity wffl be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet J&om the curb to Ae rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 stoiy high structures.

4. Built on. a Zero Lot line witii only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy majortraf&c iatersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x laiger than the surrounding stmctures when most other projects ia HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre,

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parkmg spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor busmesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parkmg wiU saturate the area \\ith overflow paiking on streets fhat are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predoimnantiy red-cmbed area Aat is amajor gateway to fhe public hikmg trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Coimmmity" label for fhis Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per umt.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project -fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many sigmficant environmental impacts of this project; and the EER. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EGR. fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EDR. fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant aad improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntmgton Beach City Code, regulations, and established, and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
>^/lo^ _ p^/^/^.3^5/ (DM ^
<^/-/^/v//^<
(Pmrt^ame^ '' /
\_7^^^^/('),'ll ^, }[,A.M^ a^L^ 42,^
riAtHome Address) ' v "" ^ ' 3^
</}^^ r\ y ^L^(\ j^/ ^/^ ^.^
(Print Email Address)
Email toHB City Counca: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Councihnembers» I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Commumfy Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntmgton Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for maay valid reasons Hiat iacluds but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density forfhe surrounding neighboifaood.

2. The proposed apartment rentpdces will range fiom $5,000 to $10,000 per monfe ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity wiU be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet fiom the curb to Ae rooftop pasayet in a neighboAaod ofpiedominantly 2 stoiy high sfa-uctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line wifh only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy majortraffic iatersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an. astonishing 69 dwelling •units-pei-acie behemoth that is 5Ax larger -than •{he suirounding • structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any paridng spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area vfiQn overflow paddng on streets that axe already overcrowded. There is extreiaely limited street parkisg ia this predominaatly red-cuibed area that is a major gateway to fee public hiking trails m the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Commuoily" label forHiis Big Box is mtentionally misleadmg as only 100 out oftfae 202 apartment vanSs are designated for assisted care (less than half). The rsmainmg 102 units wiU be rented to -wealfhy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow offcer developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that •wfll destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach commuaity.

9. The Environmental Impact Rsport ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many sigmficant environmental impacts offhis project; aad the E£R •fails to pro-^de and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and fhe EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and&e EIR's analysis ofcumulgdve impacts is deficient; andliis EIR's analysis ofahieaxiatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings wiA. substaortial evideace; and the Fmal EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too nmfterous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corroption. The City ofHuatmgton Beadi lacks substantial evidence to supportthe "fiadmgs" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beacli City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
'^t. ^/M^-f _ __ _ /ot/y/^3
(Signature)
C^5/-:/^ /(^c)d^)^
(Signature) { / ^ , (Date)
(Print Name)
A/7// -&'i^''^ /-^<~- , ^^,, ^- ^^7
(Print Home Address)
C^A^_^-</°^^3(^ ^f^( 1( ^~8'
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Coundhnembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to fhis project for many valid reasons tiiat include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighboifaood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housmg.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking wiU saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominanUy red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units \vill be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parkmg spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this axes. with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach coimmmity.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and fhe Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the ED?, and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This proj ect is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized fomi of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntmgton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^LV\,? — _ IZ'l-^
(Date) (Signature)^ )
Q\YA^ Vt (^bc^n
(Pmrt Name)
l W^ i/\//mb)<4oA. Lm^-
(Print Home Address)
.^IA (Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the followmg objections:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighboifaood.

The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from tiie curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctu-es when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-pcr-acre.

The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parkiag spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is mtentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit, This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze; or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations offhe EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and unproper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findmgs" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Ccfd^, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE ^Q and P^NY TfflS I^S^QE PROJECT!

7. 8.

9. ^SQSS&K)
l^\r
A.1^1
(Date)
Z3
(Print Name)
. [^ vs\ . Av; I Afk\^ i-^ U 1^ . ^4:
(Print Home Address)
(PrintUA^^)®^^-C^
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per monfh ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story liigh structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic mtersection in Himtington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5»4x larger than the surroundmg structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parkmg spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in fhis predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Coimmmity" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will .destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach connmmity.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and fhe EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and fhe EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the E£R fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EFR. and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is fhe oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and D3§(NY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^-^^—-—— ^^
(Date)
Zv^ ^ud^^r
t^ame)
\[ ~7r~^nA^(( W, ftv,^.
lome Address)(Print Home Address)
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Coundlmembers> I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Auproval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntmgton Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the sun-oundiag neighboAood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monsbrosity -will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from fhe curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 stoiyliigh stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line -with only a 10 feet setback -from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection m Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the smroundmg stmctures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Living Comimmity" label forfhis Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remainmg 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who wfll presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojaa Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach commumty.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project descdption; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findiags with. substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form. of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "fmdings" foi^Ztjmng Map Amendment, Zonmg Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

TO^nd DENyTHIS/tNSANE PROJECT!
Wk O^h^
^^3
^>7^,^-a^/^ Wcf7
[ome Address) /) ^ ^ /} ^-")
^^^t^^^^A^\ ^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Huntington Beach City Councihnembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Commnmty Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Buildmg is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices •will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per monfh ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood ofpredommantly 2 story high stmctares.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line -with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Himtington Beach.

5. It wUl be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x laigerthan the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling uaits-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for Visitors, customers oflhe proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predonunantiy red-cuxbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label forthis Big Box is iatentionaUy misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remainmg 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. Has Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area \vifh more Big Box high rises tihat -wiU destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach commurdty.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant euviromnental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and Ae EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis ofcumuladve impacts is deficient; and the EIR's aoalysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple ofher violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" fer Zoning ]^apAmendmei^, Zoning Text Amendment, aad Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations o^Huntingt^n Bi&^ch City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VO^E NO ai^HM?E3EfiB^BSSANE PROJECT!
f3\l\Z^)
(Signature) ' - (l5Me>
~nr^ <^'rgveK\)^<?K3
(Print Name)
^<^1- ?^)^^ Lr> '2^1 ^hf^^A ^^^
(Print Home Address)
^,4^vc^^^^^'^ / ^ -^n-vA-^J • CJ^Y^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], Robin [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntmston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City CouncUmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Aoproval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the followmg objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. TTie proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. Tliis monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from fhe curb to the rooftop parapet m a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acrc behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctires when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling uaits-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor busmesses, and a mydad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking wiU saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to fhe public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.
7, The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is mtentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remainmg 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parkmg spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and fhe EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and fhe EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's aaalysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR. and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herem.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized fonn of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntmgton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS mSANE PROJECT!
^^/ ^^, _ /^L///^3(Stature) ' ^'(Date)
Q)/}UK Z^/9
(Print Name) /
,^7 ^4*,^7t- ,^ .?<//? ^?^-^7
[Print Home Address)
7)r^^6^ iQ, ^/f&sTT^'^h „ 66 /n
(Print Email Addres^f
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntmeton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers» I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntmgton Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density forfhe surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood ofpredommantly 2 story high stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are lunited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parkmg on streets fhat are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Enviroiunental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose sigmficaat adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final BIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming aad corruptiou. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington B^ach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please_¥QTE NO an44^N¥-T9IS INSANE PROJECT!
/Z/0//^0'^
re) ' ^ (Date)'
-1-yr^ /^^</< •
(Print'Name) ^- /
^z-r T^^^/'Q <y^/e /^^-/^yy^ ,^.^^ ^/^-
(Print Home Address) " / / ' .
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: City.CounciI@surfcity~hb.org, [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Buildmg is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighboifaood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. Tliis monstrosity wiU be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to Ae rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly madequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers offhe proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking m this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setdng Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach commumty.

9. The Enviromnental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and fhe EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and fhe EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EBR. and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

PIeape VOTE NO and DENY TOIS INSANE PROJECT!
I/ ?-<?Z3
(Print Name)
^-L
rpr <Le //) /-V-i .<rL_4
(Date)
-IOY ^ D> i\^Le Clr OL- ^ , ^ <i^ h <feh ^z>/l
fome Address) /(Print Home Address)
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councihaaembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion^ scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to fhe rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acrc behemoth that is 5.4x laiger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of-the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking wiU saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking ia this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findmgs with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
/7--3 .y^ m-'&cA^^ ———— i^^ 1^
(Dafe) / '
Holh /T);^cW.
(Print Name
nn^ fboa<c} uu .1 \L 0^ HP) . ^l^l^
(Print Home Address)
}L ^br) c^ ^ a.hw. &jyi^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councitmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ADproval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surroundmg neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices -will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 stoiy high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an astouishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctures when most other projects m HB are limited to 25 dwelling ujnits-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide aay parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that arc already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community"" label forthis Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaimng 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per umt.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach conmumity.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EFR-fails to disclose significant adverse impacts m Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and flw EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
4^^-(^ ^to^n^^
(Signature)
\L^L^^ ^ -rwc^ ^ o /J
(Print Name)
t^Z^-2- V^J^PQ^ Lr. ^i^o\ \-yb C/r ^^^
(Print Home Address)
^^A/^Y-»^yn^L^-t^^ Y "^ (^ ^rr-^Cj^ .. C^Y^
(Print Email Address) .

Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Deb Janus <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 7:44 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers,
I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation ofCEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations of Huntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
Deborah
Janus 12/04/2023
(Signature) (Date)
Deborah Janus
(Print Name)
9451Candlewood
Drive 92646
(Print Home Address)
[email protected]
(Print Email Address)
Fikes, Cathy
From: Nicholas Harris <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 8:43 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter
Attachments: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers.pdf Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmcmbcrs Dear Hunlington Beach City Councilmembcrs, 1 urge you to Votr NO nnd nenv Approvnl for the proposed Bolsu Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 \N arncr Avenue, lluntington Beach. CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue und Bolsa Cliica Street). I strongly object lo this project for many valid reasons that include but arc not limited to the following objections:

1. This tiigh-dcnsity Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion. scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood,

2. The proposed apartmenl rent prices will range (rom S5,000 to S 10.000 per month (S 120,000 per year) and is nol considered to be atTordable housing.

3. This monstro&ity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb lo (lie roollop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures,

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb. this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a bus) major traffic intersection in Hunlington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 6*) dwelling units-pcr-acrc bchcmotli that is 5.4.\ larger than tlie surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acrc.

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apanmcnl units do not proviJc any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad ofdelivcry and service trucks.

Spitlover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets tliat are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly rcd-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Cliica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remainine 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a prcccdcnt-sening Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises tliat will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA, and (he EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is dendent; and the ElR's analysis ofaltematives is deficient; and the EIR tails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public commcnl amongst multiple other violations of the E1R and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and comiplion. The City ofHuntington Beacli lacks substantial evidence to support the 'Tmdings" lor Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beuch dry Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
(Signature) f ' (Date)
t^/?r^3
WCM()U^^^&
(Print Name)
50 V .r) u^^^-^^^^/r^/u^u/6a^ALP)£^g{.
(Print Home Address) ~ ' '~"" ^ ' F""~"'
W^W^i^ ^,1 S_G,t^a__^^_
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Becky G. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 9:25 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCLCMO STAFF)
Subject: Proposed Senior Living Project
Dear Council Members,
1 am a long-time resident of Huntington Beach (50+ years) and am quite concerned about the possible senior living structure at Bolsa Chica and Warner. Given this project would be double the height of the nearest multi-story property and will have 2 to 3 times the number of occupants per acre, it will block the sun for those in the area, it will create traffic, and cause other symptoms of unsupportable density, I urge you to stop the process of this plan and suggest the developer propose a structure that is better suited for this area.

I trust you will make the best decision for the people and the land of HB.

Thank you for your time,
Becky Grove
Fikes, Cathy
From: George Figueredo <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 11:38 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Object
Dear Huntington Beach
proposed Bolsa Chica S
Warner Avenue, Huntir
strongly object to this pr<
Fikes, Cathy
From: Diana Brinkley <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 10:57 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project Attachments: HD Objection Letter DB - 12.03.23 Z.pdf
Dear City Council Members,
Please see the objection letters for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project from both myself and fellow neighbor. Please vote NO on this and keep our beautiful city from turning into (a lack of a better term), hodge podge of high rise buildings.

Thank you for your service and taking the time to read this, please consider voting NO.

Sincerely,
Diana Brinkley
Sent from my iPhone
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections;

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structm-es when most other projects in T-IB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are ah-eady overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking m this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant envu'onmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse unpacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EER-'s analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient: and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and cormption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntmgton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. , Please VOT£ NO and BENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
(Signature) ' ' /1 (Date)
lMn4 ^\^Mc^
T^T^A/mwL/ 'On^^^it^ ^^ %^t/7
(Prmt Home Address)
^ i ^mk^ ^ W ^l ^6^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Apnroval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surroundmg neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet fi'om the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback fi-om the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in I-Iuntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acrc.

8. This Big Box is a preccdent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate die many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the ED?, fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient: and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofl-luntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
u^r/z'5
(SignatureV ~ U ~~^- (Date)
.g^z^^+Krt. B^i^
e1 (Print Name)
n8-?^
(Print Home Address)
1^1 W-L. Sk<^ ^?^ ^^-^ ^€^^. ^- Tzc^O
)rint Home Address)
l<^[h^y\\-e9^Ue ^?A^. ^CA^
(Print Email<Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: John Donaldson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 8:41 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Council members Attachments: Scan.pdf; Scan S.pdf; Scan 4.pdf; Scan 3.pdf; Scan t.pdf Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers,
I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No.2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 I have spoken to several neighbors and we all are asking you to vote no to this project.

Please see the attached documents containing the many reasons and signatures that we oppose this project.

Please let me know if you have any questions
John Donaldson
714-746-4261
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilincmbers Dear Huntinglnn Beach City Councilmcmbcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ADDroval for tlic proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Uving Community Project SC'H No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, IIuntington Beach, (?A. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bulsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for imuiy valid iCiisons thai include but are not liniitftl to the followitiy objections:

I. This hiyh-dcnsity Dig Bo,\ Higli Ri.se Apartment Building is too massive in size. proportion. scope, and density for the surrounding neiyhboihuod.

2. Tin- proposed apanment rent prices will rang.e Irom S5,OUO to $10.000 per nionth ($l20,UO(.) per year) and is not considered to be aHbrdablc housing.

3. This monstrosity will be (-• storiys high measuring 72 fed from the curb to the rnoHop pacapcl in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story hijih sti-ucture-s.

4. Built on a /.ero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowdiny a busy Tnajoi (raffic itilersection iti Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling unit.s-per-acro bchomolh that is 5.4x larpci thiin tlie Stittoutuling ytnicturcs when most othei projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 aparhntfnl units do not providtf any parkitiy spaces Iw visitors, customers ofthr proposed groiitid t1oor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks, Spillovei parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets (hat are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this preduminanlly rcd-curlitfd area that is » major gateway to (lie puhtic hiking trails in the Bolsu Chica Rcolopical Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is inlcntiynalty inisilcadin^ as only 100 out ol'thc 2U2 apartment unit-s are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit,

8. This Big Box is a picccdcnl-scttitig Trojan I lorse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with mory Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surrcity" beach cnmtnunity.

9. The F.nvironmental Impact Report ("EIR1") for this project fails to adequately identiiy analyze, or mitigate the many sig.nificant eaviroiunental iinpacts of this project; and (In; F.IR fails to provide aiul anitly/e an accuian; and complete project de.scription, imd (lie EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impact.s in Violation of CKQA; and the EIR's analysis orcumulativv impacts i& deficient; and the EIR's analysis or alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final E1R tails to adequately respond to Public comment timongst multiple otliei violations of (lie riR and CFQA too mnncrous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and comiption. The City ofHuntington Beuch lacks sub&UiTitial evidence to support the "findings' for Zoning Map Amendment. Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ufHuntinyton Beach City Code. regulations, and cytablishcd and accepted praciiccs.

Please VO IE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
(_ :>....... _ \.l.VI. 1^ I? 3
(Signature) , _L_ (Date)
r, ~^~~ --1
jJl-LixL „,,_,_ ^ 'LL(^_
(I'rint Name) '!
45:M--1^-^_Llv^^_llP>___^JL__l2l^l_
(Print Home AdAess)
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: ('itv,( 'oinu'ilri Mi)'f'cir\-lil),<.ir^, Knl>in.l'.st;uuslai! « Surfu{>-)il}.<»ff Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilnu'mbvrs Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny An^rovat for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Conununity Project SCII No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntmgtun B<;itch,C'A. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bol.sa Chica Street).

I strongly object to (his project for many valid reasons that include but arc not limited to (he fottowiny objections:

1. Tliis hiyli-density Big Box HiuLh Risc Apartincnt (iuilding is too massive in size, pt'opoition. scojie, ainl density for (tie sun-omulinp neishlmrhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices wilt raniw from $5.000 (o $ 10.000 per month ($ 120,00() per year) and is not considered to bu aHbrdable housing

3. This tnon&trosity will be 6 stones high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooflop parapet in a neigliborhood of predominantly 2 stun' high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback t'tom tlie curb, this Biy Box will sprawl over 3.5 acie.s crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntinylon Buacli.

5. It will he an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger ttuin the surrounding structures when most other projects in HU tire limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acte,

6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers ot tlie proposed yround floor businesses, and a myriad ol (ielivcry and service trucks.

Spitlovei parking will satunitc the area with overflow pai king on streets that are already ovei crowded. Theie is CNtiyiticly limited streci parkinc it) this predominantly red-curbed area that is a m;ijor gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa C'hica Hcotogicat Reserve-
7, 1 he "Senior l.iving Coitttiiunity" label for ttiis Big Box is intentionally misleading us only 100 out of the 202 apartnicnt units arc desi^natyd for assisicd care (less than liall). The leniaining 102 units will he rented to wealthy adult (cnanis who wilt presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse dial will allow other developers to saturate tliis area with more Big Box high rises thut will destroy our quiet "Surt'City" beach comniunity.

9. 1 lie environmental Impact Report ("HR") for this project tails to adequately identity, analyze, or mirigate the many siynit'icant enviromnental impacts of this project; and the HIR fails to provitic and analy/c an iiccnrutc and complete project description; and (lie F.IR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of' C'EQA; and the KIR's analysis ofcmnulative impacts is deficient; and the trip's analysis of alternatives is deficient; md the L1R fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public cununent amongst multiple other viutaliuns of the FIR and CF.QA too numcrony to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is (lie oldest recog.niy.ed fonn of/oning sclicining and corruption. The City ofHuntinyton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings' (or Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violarion/t-r^ I luntingtnn Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VO^E NO and I^V THIS INSANE PROJECT!
'^:^-^Z'~'~'^'' /2./3/23
, •Jl1 ri r^; L- 1>'-/..A!,( ^ ^j
(Signature) /;'/ . (Date)
(Print Name)
IT ^52 C^c^w \--^^ /^6 ^?^7
(Print Home Address)
Tfci-^jL^^wV'^-S^^ (?- /•^T^4^(?^^
(Print Email Address)
Email to IIB Cit\ Council: ( il^,( (iimcit /; Mirfcit^-tili.or^, Rul)tn.('"st;inis|;ui // Siutt'tt\ -lili.diL' 0 biection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear lluntington Beach City Councilmembm, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Apjmival for thr proposed Bolsa C'hica Senior Living Community I'roject SCH No. 20221 10040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Itcach, CA. 92649 (cross streets; Warner Avenu? and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many vsilid rcii-sons tliat include but arc not limited to the tbllowing. objections:

1. This Hyh-tlvnsity Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in si/c, proportion, scope.and density Ibi the surrounding neighborhood

2. The proposed apartment wit prices will range from S5,000 to $ 10.000 per monlh < $ 120.000 per ycnr) and is not considered to be affordable liouyin.n.

3. This monsb-osity will be 6 stories high mcasufing 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neiyhburhood ul'prcdotninniHly 2 stoiy higli structures.

4. Ikiill on a Zero l.ot line with only a 10 feet sytbiick from the curb. Ihis Biy Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy inajoi traffic intersection in Huntinyton Beach.

5. It will be tin astonishing 69 dwdliny units-pct-acrc behemoth that is 5.4\ larger than the surrounding structurcii when most other piojccls iti I IB are limited to 25 dwelling unils-pcr-acic

6. llie grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parkinu; spaces for visitors, custuiiwrs of (lie pi0j)osed ground floor businesses, and a myriad ol delivcty UIKI service trucks.

Spillovcr parkitiy will saturate the area with overfluw parking on streets that are already overcnwded- 'I'lieie is extiriinety limited street parking in Oiis prcdotninantly rcd-cuibcd area tliat is a majai gateway to the public hiking trails in thv Bolsit Cliica F.cological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Li\ iny Community" L'lbd for ttiis Big Bo\ is tiiretitionally misleading as only 100 out of the 2U2 apanment units are designated for assisted care (less than halO. Thy remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants whu will prc;»u"iably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. '1 his Big Box is a prcccdcnt-sclting "1'rojan I lorse that will allow other developers to saturate ttiis aica w«l» more Big Box high rises that will destroy oui quiet "Surf City" beach community,

9. The r.nvironrnental Impact Report ("L'lK") for this pioject (ails to adequately identif\, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental inipacls oftliis piqject, and the E1R fails to provide and analy/.c <m accurate and complete piqject description; and the EIR faits lo disclose siynilicant adverse iiupiicts in Violation of CEQA; and the FIR'S unalysis ol' cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIK's unalysis of alternatives is dcticient; and the KIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR tails to adequately respond to Public conmwU amonsst multiple other violations of the H1R inni C'EQA too numerous to list all herein,

10. Tins project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot 7ot>e which is (lie oldest lecogni/cd form of'y.oning scheming and corruption. The City ol'Hunting.ton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings' fbi Zoniny Map Ainendment. Zoning text Anlendincnt. and Conditional Use Pennit amongst nmltiple otiiet violations of Huntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOI/E NO arid DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
t^,(^/<::L -- _ _,^^/^^- ?.,
(S'lgnat^ire) 7 ' —-•— ~~~ (Date)
f{/[^-{\ U^U-^a.. ..._...._._„..„_
(Print Niunc)
\c,^5.^ C-A^C^Q ^_L^\^t. HO;T/ ^(i-^^^ V^^.^_CA-.-'i£:fo-(-l? (Print I lome Address)
Vt ^ ^ , i- . O^^ftw^- ^rnfi\ | - c-^^^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council; ( i)\,( mnu'ihf sin-liil\-tili.(n'y. t^()lun.l.t>t;inist;u( « Snrfcil\-t)l>.<i>'{_' Objection Letter lo Huntineton Beach Citv Council mcmhcrs Dear UunHngton Beach City C'ouncilmcmbcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Annroval for the proposed Bolsa C'hica Senior LivinK Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, C'A. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue and Bulsa Chica Street).

I -strongly object to this project For iniiny vidid reasons tliat include but are not limited to the tbllowing objections;

1. This higli-dcnsKy Big Bo\ High Rise Apartment Buildiny is too massive in si/.e, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighburhood,

2. The proposed aparltncnt rent prices will range from S5.000 to S 10.000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories lii^li measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapcl in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.
4, Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 t'vel setback froni ihe curl), this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major iranic iniet section in Huntington Be;lcli,

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwclliny iitiils-per-acre behemoth (hat is 5.4x larger th.in tliv surronndiny structures when mosl otliei piojects in 11B arc limited to 25 dwelling, unit s-pci-acre. 6, The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesseii. und a myriud ol'dclivciy and set vice tmcks, Spillover parking will saturate the area with overllow parking on streets dial are already overcrowded. I'tiere is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbcd area that is a nuijur giiteway (o the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Cliica Ecolopical Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Bo.\ is intent ionatly misleading as only 100 out of (he 202 iipurtincnl units are designated for assisted care (less Ihan halt). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. "ITiis Big Box is a prccedent-setling Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "SurtTity" beach community. 9, The Fm ironmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant CTvironmentttl hnpads of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and atialy/e an .iccuratc und cuinplute project description: and the H1R fails to disclose significant adver.sc impacts in Violation of CEQA; imd tin; EIR's analysis of'cumulative impacts is dcticient; and the EIRs anulysis ofaltcmativcs is dellcicnt; and the El R tails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final El R fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations uftlic H1R and CEQA (oo rnimcrous to list all herein,

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City of'Huntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "tlndings' for Zoning Map Amendment. Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amon&st multiple othei violations of Huntington Bcauh City Code. regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOI K NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
J^GJU^A)M^ f^| ^\vAAxVK)Y- _ _|_1^3J^O <^ 3
(Signature)J ,J ' ('Date)/
M^r^ Sp5^ !^\a,^DA^^w_
(Print Nam6) '^
1636'Z C(^<^e Lh-< ^l^-Uo^ ^cl^ CF\ ci2 6 ^
(Print Home Address) -•'
^s^€6-;ao^sa u^lnoo.(o vr
(Pi itnHmail Address) ••' »
Email to HB City Council: ( it\,( <>iiticit« sin Tfil\-lili.orn, R<ilun.fM;tnisl;ui « Snrltily-titi.oiH Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City C'ouncilmembcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and Uenv Apuroval for the proposed Bulsa Chicil Senior Living Community Project SC'H No, 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, Huntington Beach, (-'A. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid rcason.s that include but arc not limited to (lie following objections;

1. This luiih-dunsity Rig Box High Rise Apartment Buildiny is (on massive in size. proportion, scope, and density <bt the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed npartinent rent prices will range (rom S5.000 to S 10.000 per month ($120,000 per ycm) and is not considered to be aftbidable honsiny,

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to (lie rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stnicturcs.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet sftback from (lie cuil), ttiis Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 iicrcs crowding a buw major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach, 5, It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x hiryer <han tlic sdnoundinu stmctiirds when most ollici projects in I1B are limited to 25 (twdling units-|Ter-acie.

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the" proposed ground floor businesses, and a tnyriad ol delivciy and service trucks.

Spiltover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets tlial are already overcrowded, There is extremely limited street pmkiny in (his predotninantly red-curbed areu tlmt is ;i tnajor gateway to the public hiking trails in the Uolsa Chic^ Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living C'oinmunity"' label for Ihi.s Big tiox is intentionally misleading as only 100 ou< of the 202 apiirtmcm units arc desiynated for assisted cm-c (less (ban haK), The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a preccdent-setting Trojan 1 lorse that will allow other developers to saturate this area \vith more Big Box high rises tlial will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. 1'hu Enviroimicntal Impact Report ("El R") for tins piqject fails to adequately idenrify, ;maly<si;. or nntiyatc (lie main significant environmentiil impacts oFthis project; and the E1R taits to providi; a«tl analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose sigiutlcant adverse impacts in Violation ot* CEQA; and the ElK's iuiatysis orcunnilative impacts is deficient: and (he EIR's analysis of alternatives is dclicicnt; and tlie El R fails to support its findings willi substantial evidence; and the Final LIK fails to adequately respond to Public coiunient amongst multiple other violations of the FIR and CHQA too tiumeious to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognised form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City orHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to iiupporl ttic "findings" for Zonitiy Map Amendment, Zoning Text AiTiendnient. and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntinyton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Pkase VOI I: NO and U^V THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^2L^/_27^'_<^-^-~: - ___„. / ^-it'^- -/^^^
^yiature) , ' (Dale)
/^v,^ j) LncA^;
(Print Name)
l'>^;^ Ca.^c^'-t/ ^w
(Print Home Address)
^M^^Gi:^ ^^.^^'l''^.^'s/l:r'
(Print pniail Address)'
Email to HBf'ity Council: < i(:li.('<nnifil n Mirttitv-hh.uiH. R()t)iiii.l'^!;inil>i;i«'< S(irfciry-lil>.(»ry Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 7:08 PM
To: Van Der Mark, Gracey; Strickland, Tony; Burns, Pat; McKeon, Casey; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; Bolton, Rhonda; Kalmick, Dan
Subject: Objection Letter
Attachments: AM Signature.jpg; My Signature.jpg
I tried sending these attached letters to Robin Estanislau but somehow I must have received the wrong email as I can't send it. If you could please forward these two attached letters, I'd greatly appreciate it.

We are voting NO and deny approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No.2022110040
If you have any questions or additional information, please email me back.

Thank you,
Michael A Brunet
714-910-9139
Objuction I ^tt£iF_hUJun(i,,t,((,,, nc;n.ii
flcar^r,m^ngto« Beach G(y Co,«tcili.,<.,nhci,,
proposed Bo[sA Cbicn .Senin^ I .iJi^.'r^.'."""1'.

Wiirner
iRtrongly
City r'oiincilmefflbfiH
^Q.^QM^E^^tQf^ ^.BCalG(y cu""vil")an^^ 1 ur^. y«.< K.VoK.NOwd !l2"lLAM£2^^ffi^ ^1^^'".^ uvi^'c^^y ^S^'I'I'N^^
^AS^^n£ ^' C^W^^ V^«^Av«m<; «"d B()lsaa1'"Ist^t!i^,
ilv object lo H,,s p,x>,cc( fo,. ^y^M^^'^J^^ n^'lSlVo r^}"Hown& "bjecrions:
and

2. 3.

4. ^tss^a,^""- "»"•""" »• "• «•"-" •" -• •""""•"" "•"-" ScSSSs;S""?to'l'&<>l>fl'"<l'''<'''<ll'u'n'o'l'''<I'M'<'""^" ^S^!£^IlbeAston?ihlBi^cn,uring 72 fc.( from th, curb tu Uic n,o^p par^t •" ^!S^wd.^Kdotnitw^ S'hShSt;^11"H" l""1"1' " "'^ 'w""r r~ '. , , ^^t:to.wlinc;.svlt1' °"lv " K'^dback'^m te curb, Lh,. Big Box will Spnnvl ov.r 3,:' 3cr.s

5. S^:;S^orl-IJt?'^;sec^^ "'" "T- ' '........
ola",astonl^"ls6ydwd11^ units-p^ac^lx-h^h'lhaf i, 5.4v l;u^nh."i Ihc snn-oundi^.

6. SC(^slw'u;U^TOt^rpJ'";ccteinHB ^ (iwil^^'^d'^cHKigum^p^crc. ^Brossl^nacf^'late m ParLinS spac^ fcr2f)2'ai.artmcnt;tunts^unor provide any parking ^^ fo>- ^lw^ cus£""t? o^tii^ proposed ground floor bu^essvK, and a mynad ofdeliveiy aJid ^rvice Enjck^ wrpar'?ng wil1 Aarllratc thu an:?l witf] owi-flow pmking oii'strccls [hat are already ovcwouded- Tli^ K^arvm^ty limited struyt paAing in this piudominauJv-red-:cnit)ed arca'diat is a major gateway- (ci ihy p»bl;t- ?^fa-nib uifhc Bol^diica &ol^i^i"lS^>'""J luu-""t"u £I"U """ '" "'""'" "' >cnior Living Community" hibd ft>nliis Bis Box is intunl.ionallv ini';lca.lm.K ;u only 10" OI!E of the 202 npu.rmenl.un.ts alc desl§natL'<1 l"'-aLisislud care (tyss Lliniilialf), Tfic ivmaining 102 unil.s^ill bL ^n[ed to ^a?y;ld«(t tenants wllo ^il] p^SLiniably rc^i^ (.aikings]Mffi^^runit- g b-«x ly a preccdmt-scttfny Trojw Heirs? ih.at will allciv,' otlier developers t:o saturate thi'j area \'. ich iw^Hig Bw Jm?!i rises that wl\ d^tw our quiet --SiirfCi|y"bcudi c^nnuuutv. ^ Mn'n-onmuntel Lnpac! iicpori (--Elfl--) for Hns proiecl feiis fo aduqiiatslv idcnti^, nnaJv.e. (jr mitigate the mTy^gnlfictmt t;uvironmental "upacts oftiiii; pn^ct; ;iiid !.hv EFR -fail^ to provute. ajni analv^c an ac^iraie a'^wlpIehipTOled dcsci'iPt".w and A^ C1R Jails to JisJose su.njlicunt a<Jw^u-impacl.mV^lation of- Y^A; anu ?v £[R-s <]ual^iK orcmiiiiktiw iii)p;icfy is drficivnt; and diu blR'y <uialvsis ofaltcmar\f^ 13 laenH and the ER finls lo support, its fiiidi!igs with ^ub^antial evidencv; and tlic i-uiaJ'l£[Rfaib'to- aAX!ltak;KK'spf-'od Ty pubiie co""1lcni a"'^OTt multipiu ol],,r viylatiuns oftlicfclR nnd CEa'V^o numerous to list ail lie ruui, --- --.^---....-.—..^.--,^..
10' li<sptr>Jyctiy ab!atanl a"d""prof5L'rfti-;'"^ 10 Sjrot Zone which iy Uie oldest i-^co^i/cd (bnu of^nms S^"'^a;i^ITT:.71!ecwomm£itlglonBeac!l]auk^u^^
^;'^,^PAm!mi'?l:l!'ZOT^A"'c"(Jmcn['lmdc0^
^o^n«ii,^ufnHigto^ichatyCodc.i^,fations,an(I^Tabli,heU^ J^easg VOTE NO aw^t^V THIS WSAW PkOJECTF""1"""'^' u"u "L"-w^"-aalc"-

8. 9.
(Si^
(Print Name)
(Prini'Hornc. Address)
('Print Emar< Address)
fiuwl (6 HB City Councjf:
5|m ^<w ?tT<nfrlr
^^-^^^^^^^
i^>^A,-b^1ia Mt^'i. AwJ-
•••'•«'Sf'«.'.UflcitV-!th. „!•<.. i<tiiHH.i-A!,u(i..l;,|; ;'ft';*-iniu(v,.Sih,ory
L;_
QNtwtion t.tettcrtnllundrietdn BtfafhCitvt^micil members S^HUW!"gl<f"&;"ch CT{y GoiHtcilincmbo-s, I U«-KC you (o Vc«- NO nnd y£i2xAfiJ2mM! proposed Bbkn Cl,icn Senior Living Community Pr(,jyriSCH"No:2TOzTl(104(> iti<-»(^1r<T4<^an<l 4<m eniie, Hundngton Beach, CA, 9264(/«:rog3 slrcets: Wnrncr Avenue Hnd Hclsa aneftStrcfflt, bjcct to this project for many v;llid reasons ihat inclu<ti3 but are iiut limitud to llit: foll'wiriB «t)ji:cy(dis- for ilte
4<iit%and4<m

2. 3.

4. 5.

6. .111is!nlg^-d^us<ty Rig Box His11 Risei Apilrtmutil Btulding is too ni^siye in siw, proportion. Wiptf, wd density ibr the. surrounding nmghborhaid,
The propo.sGi-j a.parim<?ni rynt^riuL-s will raug,' fron.i ;$5,OOQ to $10,000 per nwnLh (.'iil20,(J<)0 pi.-r year) and ^ m)^ considered to be affiirdiililu housing
This monytTiositv will be 6 stories lnyh measuring 72. feet. fl-nm Uie curb to thu rooftop parapet in a nyighburfiood of predominantly 2 .sLury liigli simctuKS.

BuiKou a7ero Lot.liuc wift otilv a 10 fcil yutbiiuk froin t1it.- uurb. this Bic.Bux will sprawl over 3-1 acsvs crowding a busy tiiaj or traffic inlcrscclion in Hunliugton Beach.

It v. ill be an astnnislung 09 dweliiug uuits-por-act-e. behemoth that. is 5.4x laigerthau [he iiuiroundiny stmctures wlien m»Kt other projuub'in HB arc limited to 25 dwelling uaits-pcr-acrc.

The grossly inadequaLc 1 R9 parkmg spaces for'202 aparLnniiit unils do nol provide any parl.dng spaces Ibj' viijitors, CLislomei's of the pro[xised fii-ound f1o»r bnHine.sscs, and a myriad of delivery and semcu trucks Spillover parking wiU SAturalt; \]w area v.itll ovedlov? parkijig on streets ? at ani alTcady overcro'.vded Tncre is c^TC.mel\. limiicd stw.-rtpafkiug in.-thi'i predommaiitly rcd-cuifaed arca llia^ is a niaior gali.'.way to ihr public hiking, Trails in Ltic Bolsa a-dca. Ecological R^iy've- The '''Senior Living C.'ommuniLy'' label forfliis Big Box is intcnl-ionaliy misleading as only 100 uut ofthL- 202 apartmi.-nl units are (icsignatcct for asyisted care (les.s tliail lialf), The rejnaining 102 units mil bu rented 10 i.vcalthy titiuit Lunanl.s who will pre&iimabiy require 2 parldng spiices }~WT uflit.

This Big Box is a prcL'edent.-seft.ing Tropn Horse thai will allow ylher cievelopv:rs to saturaLc diis aren will more Big Box high ri.seii that will. de'-sLroy our quiet -'S.urFCity"' beach communitY.

The Envu'omnental liTipac'l Report F-KIR'') for tliisixojcct fails to adequately idunlitv, analyse, or miti&ats the many sjipnficant environmunEal impact,'; oftlti&projyct; mid die F.1R fa.ils to pro\>idu and ana.lyzi; an accurate and voniplete project descnpliyn; and the KIR- fails to disufusc si&.niticiint adverse impacts in Viol?on of CEQA; wd die HI.K's aualysis ofcimmladvc iiupa.cts is dcfiL-ieut, and liiu EIR's ana.lysis ofaitemativc-s i& deficienr. and Ae E1R. tails to support its findings with snbslantiil e.vidyncc; ajid tlie. Final K[R:la.ils 10 advquateiy respond l.o Pnbjiu coimiienl amongst mylliple other violations of-Qw E1H. and CEQA too numerous to li.sta.U here.i-n.

10. This project is a blatant and iinpropur attempi 1:0 Spot Zone which is theoldest rvcogmzed fonTi of zoning ycliemin^. artd con'uption- The City ofMuntington Beitch lacks substaniiul cvidctice to suppi.irt tlic "Findings' for Zoning Map Amendme.nl, Zoning Te.'d.^iundnikint, and Conditiotial Use Pemiil iiniougsl mulupli.- olhor violations' of Hiintmyton Beach Cil.y Code; njyulations, and established and accepted prac.uci's-

7. s.
•J-
Please Y!
(Signatu
TE NO mi DENYTUTS TNSANB PROJECT!
^^^ffea^I'-1

7.-t.?
(Date)
%A£^4-.&"^__.
in): N&mi;}
_^l^-kcl f/>^.
(Print N&mi;}
(Punt Home Address)
MML/^-^&A-
^^^ciHAU^ ^:^t"l—
"(fnttt Boiail Address)
litnaH ^ liB.GityCountli: Citv.Cuiniuj^urt'a.tv-hli.ui-i'. t^Mbtit-KM.iiitNiani^SnrR'itv-hu.^*- lii
Fikes, Cathy
From: Caryl Lee <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 2:05 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Subject: Stop this high rise development!
Obi«
Dear Huntington Be^
proposed Bolsa Chics
Warner Avenue, HUB
I strongly object to this

1. This high-density I
density for the surr

2. The proposed apart
not considered to b<

3. This monstrosity Wi
Fikes, Cathy
From: Janice Chancy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 12:42 PM
To: Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Highly object to this location... traffic already a nightmare with the wetland hikers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No.
2022110040
located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections: 1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing. 3.

This monstrosity is proposed at 5 stories high but plans indicate it will rise 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures. 4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 2.8 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach. 5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre. 6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks. Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve. 7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit. 8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community. 9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein. 10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City of Huntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations of Huntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
_12/3/2023_ Janice & Gary chancy (Date)
Janice & Gary Chancy_4472
Oceanridge
Dr.

Huntington Beach
(Print
Email Address)
Sent from my iPad
Fikes, Cathy
From: kyle gurwell <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 3:44 PM
To: Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: Opposition to the Warner/Bolsa Chica Proposed Massive Construction Project Attachments: Letter of Objection for Neighbors to SignJ 1 -23-2023.pdf Please see my attached letter in opposition to the proposed Warner/Bolsa Chica project.

Sincerely,
-KyleGurwell
Kyle Gurwell
Qbiection Letter to Hyntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!"'X^~~^~77
/^^ yii^' December 2, 2023
(Signature) // (Date)
Kyle Gurwell
(Print Name)
16872 Coach Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92649
(Print Home Address)
[email protected]
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: John B <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 2:28 PM
To: Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection Letter for HB High Density...

Attachments: John Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmember.pdf Resending as I just saw one email was incorrect. See below.

Begin forwarded message:

From: John B <[email protected]>
Subject: Objection Letter for High Density ...

Date: December 2, 2023 at 11:57:46 AM PST
To: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Couacilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ApDroval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the .curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
<^.l^ _ i^/Z/z^a(Signature)^ - (Date)
W/^ 1^, 6e^e^
(Print Name)
(^7z ^^^-^ r>y. H^^-i^^ 6^a C<4. '72Gti7
CPrint Home Address)
If ^ ZU (^ >^^ (^^>
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Tami B <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 2:25 PM
To: Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Subject: Fwd: Letter for City of HB Council members
Attachments: Tami Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Counciimember.pdf Re-sending because I had email address wrong before.

Begin forwarded message:

Objection letter you all need to see. Stop developing our city, and these prices are Not affordable for elderly people. This should not be happening in our city. Please do Not let this area be built! Thanks
Tami Belies
see attached
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmcmbcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, Huntington Beacli, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beacli.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow .parking on streets tliat are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to tlie public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan H&rse tliat will allow otlier developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the E[R fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
-^C .-z-.&^— _ n/1 \Q(^
(Signature) '" ' (Date)
Tapni C. ^-efic^
(Print Name)
6SSS ^o^k'Cr l-hvTtLn^o n'Sz^c^ CA S'Z6^7
(Print Home Address) ' I.
^vni b^77'7 (c-- -M/v>A ..r,^,
(Print Email Address) ^
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: KellyZoern <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 2:10 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection Letter for the HB City Councilmembers Attachments: Kelly Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Counciimember.pdf This is important. Please see attached letter.

Thanks
"Kelly" PenellaOZoern
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huatiagton Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Anproval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range irom $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing. • -

3. This monstrosify will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the .curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 Acres crowding a busy major tmffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwellmg units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan H&rse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR. fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TMS INSANE PROJECT!
' ^<^M^ a. ^^- _ _ iz./1,23
(Signature) ^ • (Date)
<%n&ll<\ 0^ 2-^-^m
(Print Name)
^•S'A ^\//,k "Or I^L^-tin^n ^^ CA ^W^]
(Print Home Address)
MVVsZoW (<? *s /P'=n I .^/T^
(Print EmaiI'Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Vivienne Herald <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 1:17 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Vote No on Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project Attachments: HBCouncilObjectionLtr.pdf; HBCouncilObjectionLtrZ.pdf Importance: High
Please see attached.

Thanks,
Vivienne Herald
Objection Letter to Huntim»ton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City CouncUmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and DemLAmiroval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood,

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
.? /^-/-^3
(Date)
^^^IY_^^ C /-^ ^^ /rf
(Print Name)
) p, ^ ~^1 / .5^ _ ,7^7, S.^r'/^c- ^^ ^ 6 77C/^
(Print Home Address)
I e
(Print EmaijAddress)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5.000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach,

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identity, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the El R fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient: and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list alt herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^L/^</ ^ ^^^ ^ _ ^-/-^:?
(Signature) (Date)
I/,/ vi e^i t^ e- ^ /'-o/J
LVS ( ^
(Print Name)
/^ ^ /A^ ,-7^7, -^ ^ c:-/-^; //^ ^
(Print Home Address) c/^ <p!cf^_
y i v C^ ,<?7 /ie V 0/-e^ • ^ oy?^-
(Print Email Address)^
Email to HB City Council: City.Council(%surfcity-hb.org, Robin.EstanisIau(S)Surfcity-hb.org Fikes, Cathy
From: John B <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 11:58 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); [email protected] Subject: Objection Letter for High Density...

Attachments: John Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmember.pdf Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ApDrovaI for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on aZero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow .parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan H&rse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^.1^ _ '^./Z ,^23(Signature)^' - (Date)
W/^t VJ. 6e^e^
(Print Name)
{^5'z ^y^-^ J>r. A/^^-^ ^€^ C4- ^^^y7
(Print Home Address)
^f^i Z 1C ^ Y^c^r Ce^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes. Cathy
From: Lydia Scott <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 7:13 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection letter to HB
Attachments: Objection letter to HB.pdf
Lydia
Objection Letter to lluntineton Beach Citv Councilmembers Dear Uuntington Beach City Councilmcmbcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and Dc!U_Am>!Mal for the proposed Bofsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and I?olsa Cliica Street). 1 strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. Tins high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion,scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy inajor traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x laiger than tlie surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate die area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and die EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone wliich is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^-^ J^ ^- /z - /. ^
(Signature) (Date)
^^/A -Scorr
(Print Name)
5 t/^2. /^^A^-Z-A />i^
(Print Home Address)
^/A^OTT-,? ^ /A^P'0. ^0^ ,
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: City.Council^surfcify-hb.org, Robin.Estanislau'u'Surfcity-hb.org Fikes, Cathy
From: Den N <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 6:32 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection letter to Huntington Beach City Council Members Attachments: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers.pdf See four attached letters
Qbjcction Letter to.lluntineton Beach, Citv Councilmcmbcr& Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and pcnv Annroval for (lie proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue and Bolsa Chicn Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons dial include but are not limited to tlic following objections:

1.This higli-densily Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neigliborliood.

The proposed aparunent rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

This inonstrosity will be. 6 stories high me9syring.72 feet from dies curh to tlie rQQftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

Built on a Zero Lot line witli only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Th&grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202apartment^ units do notprovide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited sh-eet parking in tliis predominantly red-curbed area tliat is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will desfroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts, of this. project;, and the. EIR fails. to prQvide. and analyze, an accurgte. and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and die EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This. project is atflgtant gnd improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the. qldest refiogpize<j fQrm QfzQning. scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map amendment. Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violationspfH^ngton Beac^City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. <.c VXWlSferana-Q^N^THlSi INSANE PROJECT!

2. 3.

4. 5.

6. 7.

8. 9.
(Signals).
(Print Name)
^ ^VA/
^\\\ZQZ'
(Date).'
1^7 ^f^^TL^ )^,C^^Z^t^
Home Address) ^ /
W^ (^ \C^[K\^CD^A
(Print Home Address)
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council; City.CounciKajsurfcity-lib.org, [email protected] Objection Letter to Uuntiueton Beach City Councilmcmbcr& Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Annroval for (he proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, Huntington Bench, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wurncr Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

This high-density Big Box High Risc Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

This monstTQsity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high struchires.

Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major trafilc intersection in Huntington Beacli.

It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth tliat is 5.4x larger than the surrounding stmctures when most ottier projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling uiuts-per-acre.

The-grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to sahirate tliis area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

The Environmental Impact Report ("E1R") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant envu-onmental impacts Qftliis project,, and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and tlie EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt tQ Spot Zone which is (lieeldestrecognized fQnnQfzoniug scheming and corruption. Tlie City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations'ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices, Pleas<rVOTE NO and DENY THIS ^(SANE PROJECT!

7. 8.

9. (Signa;
(Print Name)
A^v
'w^^
Hi '^9./
(Print Home Address)
(Print Email Address)
(bate)^
Z-/)-^
Q^hwo^i-
Email to HB City Council: Gty.Council(%surfcity-Iib.org, Rol)in.Esliinislnu(®Surfcity-lib.org Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmcinbers Dear Ilunlinglon Beach City Councilmcmbcrs, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Annroval for (lie proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 20221 1U040 located nt 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, IInntington Bench, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue and Bolsn Chica Street).

I strongly object (o this project for many valid reasons that include but arc not limited to die following objections:

1. Tliis liigh-dcnsity Big Box Higl) Risc Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apariiinent rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be afTordablc housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb tQ (lie roQflop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Hunlington Bcacli.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most otlier projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-pcr-acre. &. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that arc already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in tliis predominantly red-curbcd area that is a major gateway to tlie public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of (lie 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. Tliis Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Envkoiunental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this. project; and the EIR fails to prQvide. and analyze an accurate. and complete project description; and the EtR. fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This. project is a blgtgnt and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is. the oldest recognizec} fonn of zoning scheming and^brruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning ^t6p Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Pemiit amongst multiple other violatioqy^fHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Plca^VOTE NO and DEN^THIS INSANE PROJECT!
?. KG^- _ ^.. /. 2.W
^>^n^ t. ^^
_^
(SignatureV' " *J (Date)
(Print Name)
.?^..(Print Home Address)
L^U ba.^oJw l^^4^- W- ^^^L
(Print Home Address)^J
^ L\ UM 'k r 6) _ Q\^ I ^-6 VIA.
(Print Email Address) <J ^
Email to HB City Council: Ci(y.Council(«)surfcity-lib.org, Robin.Estanislnu((?Surfcity-hb.org Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach Citv Councilmcmbcrs Dear Ilunrington Beach City Councilmcmbcrs, I urge you (o Vote NO and Deny Anprovnl for the proposed Bolsn Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 20221 10040 located nt 4952 and 4972 Warncr Avenue, IIuntington Bench, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wurncr Avenue and Bol.sa C'hica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but arc not limited to the following objections:

1. This Ingh-density Big Box High Risc Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per yc;ir) and is not considered to be afTordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to Ihe rooftQp parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Dig Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beacli.

5. I( will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acrc belicmotli that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling nnils-per-acrc.

6. The yrossly inudequate 1 89 parking spaces for 202 apiirtmcnl units do not provide any parking spaues for visitors, customers oftlic proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. Tliere is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly rcd-curbcd area tliat is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bo1sa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. T1ic "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units arc designated for assisted care (less than half). Tlic remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit. 8, This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow otlier developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" bcacli community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this projccl; and the EIR fails to provide qnd analyze an accurate and complete project description; and (lie EIR. fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the ElR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the El R fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final E1R fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst mulriple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beacli lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^(^^^^^<==h^ ^- ^ ^
(Signaturey \ 77 (Date)
[aurr^i\ l\H. l\\ar^
(Print Naine) c
/q^l.Q^wnJ^r /~^ne. , l-li.^n^n^arl} r/\ ^^-"^ ^
(Pi hit Home Address)
L})ALi (.0 <? 'f^ r (^) G mu J. r &. n"»
(Print Email Adclres^) (.

Emnil to HB City Council: C'i(y.C'ouncil(«'sutTci(y-Iil).org, Rol>in.Ls(;uiisliiuWSurfrity-lib.or{; Fikes, Cathy
From: Peggy Bowman <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 5:36 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCLCMO STAFF)
Subject: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Attachments: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers.pdf Sent from my iPhone
Objcdion I -ctU'i' to li» 11 (injstyi* Be;<c h ('j( y (.'on ncil ni tin I »r r,s Drai Hun(in{;ton Bvach C'Xy ( ouncilmcnitH'r'i 1 t)i;.;t yi>n (D yoU-^10 uud Drtiy Approviit (01 lin- proposed llolsa Chlca Senior UvinR(.'ommuiii<y ,l'ti)Jfc( SCII Nu. 2022110040 lociifcd nf 4W. nnd (1)7< Warncr Avenue, Iluntingtnn Beach, CA. ()Zfr41) (cro-is slrccts: Wnrncr Avriuic nnd Bnis-i Clilra .Slrci •(). 'Urongty object (o this project for m;iny vnlid r.;;isons tlml inctudy Iml nn; iiot liinilrd lo lii.; Inllo'.'/in); ul)ji;t;lii»n:>

1. This hi^li-den.sity Big Box High Kisc A[i;iitiiK'nl Ihiildinj?, is loo niiisiiivi: in si/c, pro()(nli<»n, :,(;u|>i;, ;iml tiun.sity Ibr the sumiunding ncigliborliyud.
2, 't'Tic proposed apartment runt prices will riin;;u fi'Min rl;5,(100 to $ I (),()()() prr fiinutli ($120,000 fin yr;ir) nnd i') not considered to bu alkmlablc lioiising,
3, This inonslrosity wilt be 6 slurirs high measuring 72 fcul (rofii llic curl) (o Ihc roudop p.iiiipfi in ;i ncighborlmod (ifprrdomjnantty 2 story higli slmcturus.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line wilh only a 10 feet sulbnck frnni llw curb, Itu's Big ti(u will ,s|>r;iwl nvci 3..S aufr.', crowding a busy major tmfl'ic intctscction in Uuntinytyn Duacli.

S, It will be ;m astonishing 69 dwulliiij; nnits-pur-acrc bclicmutli th;it i.s 5,4x lurycr thiiii liic .sunuudiJin;; stnjclurcs when uio.st other prujrcl.s in IIU iiri: limitud to 25 ilwulliiiB uditH-iicr-nurr. ft, ('lie grossly inadequalc I 89 piirkins spaces for 202 iipnrlnicnl units do nut provide nny p.irkinn s|)iii:L's loi vi.silors, cnslonicrs of'tfif proposed ground Hoor tin.sinu.ssc.s, and si itiyriud of'dulivury !intl scr'/iuc ifuuk'i, Spillovrrp.irkiiiiJ; will snlmiHu the arui willi i)Vi:rlli>w pink in;.! 011 Nlruuls tliiil ini; nlrc.nly nvrrciowdi.'d. 'I Ir'ii:
i.s cxtruniely limited slnx-t parkin(t in (liis predominunlly rcd-curbecl firc.'i tliiit is it ninjor t',;iti;'.v,iy t<i IhL' pntilic hiking Iniils in the Bot.sa Chica Ficological Reserve.
7, The "Senior Living Community" l;ibul for tlii.s Dig Uox is intyiitiunally mislu.nlinK ii.s only l()(l util of tin; 2(12 npurtment unit.s arc (lcsignufcd far a-ssistcd cure (less lliun hult). Tlic reuiainiiii; 102 unil'i will bu frnti;(l I" wciilthy udult (rnanl.s who will presumably require 2 pnrking spaces per unit.

H. This Uiy Box i.s a pruuedunt-.sutling Trojan Hor.su Ihat will i-illow othur (luvulopcrs to ,s;itm;ttc llii.-i ;irc;i v.illi more Big Box lligli risc.s ttial will duslruy ourijuiut "SurfCity" buucli corninunity,

9. 'fhe KnvironmunUil Impact Report ( EIR ) for this project fails to ndcquatcly identily, iifi.ily/c, ni iriili)',!it(: llr many significant environmental impiicls ol'this project; mid Ihc HIK fails lo providy ;in(l ;in;ily/u ;in .'K.uniiin:
and compfutu project du.scription; and tlie EIR fail,'! lo dmulosc signinciint ndvur.sc ini();tct.s in Viululion (if C'EQA; and (he GIR's analysis ofcumutiili'/c impacts i.s (.lcflcicnt; and the I^IR'.s iiuulysis t)< 'iillcmiUi'/c', is dclicicnt; and lliu JilR fails lo .support its finding;; willi .snb.sl.inliul cvidcncu; iiiltl ttiu I'iruil EIK l;ij|>, ID udcqualuly respond to Cnblic cumrnunl among.sl multiple oltn;r violatiun.s oi'ttn: lilK ;ind (,'1'.QA too numciDir, to list all liL'rcii).

10. 7 his project i.s u blatynt iind improper iillurnpl (o Spot /.ooc which is tin; oldusl rcuogni/.ed Ibrm ot /i>mn" scheming ;ind corruplion. •1'lit; Cily ol'llunlington Buiiuli tack.s sub.stanli;it uvidcncc lo support llii; "lindinj"," for Zoning Map Amundmcnt, /.uniny Tuxl AmciKtnicnt, iiniJ Cooditional (J.su ['mnit iinnNi^si rnullipli.- (»llu:i violations ot'IIuntingttw-Ouicli City Code, regulations, iind cst.iblinhud un<l di;cepte<l pr,icti<;u, fleasf VOTE NO un(< DR^VUILS JNSANK I'ROJEC"!'!
^9- ^
FAjJk_ \'>O^^A^
^-/-^2oy
):ilu)
n'fi'nl Name)
,J/.ci^!,^> ^T^
ff'rinl Home Addrcs,s)
\A^^W> ^/^)
•'riril hm;iil Acfdrc.s.s)
(•-mail «• I(« City foiincil: < it.v.Couiiritonrfrily-fib.orn, Kol>i,i.(<;s(iim:<lati^SiHicity..hb.tt,-, Fikes, Cathy
From: Debi Murray <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 5:25 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL.CMO STAFF)
Subject: 9 Signed Objection Letters - Dec 1,2023
Attachments: 9 Signed Objection Letters - Dec 1 2023 - 5-ZOPM.pdf Scanned with TurboScan.

Debi Murray
Debi Murray Team
Realtor
First Team Estates I Christie's International
BRE# 01248956
949-981-7570
[email protected]
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I sfrongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are lunited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre,

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parkmg spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-cm-bed area fhat is a major gateway to the public hikmg trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment uuits are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or midgate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EFR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EFR. fails to support its fmdings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized fomi of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations of^Huntiugton Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOT&^Ogn^TBpNY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
^".^•^
(Signatpre) ^ ^~ ^ , . (Date)
UWW[)IA 5w^
(Print Name)
^^ 22"? sr.^^;^ g^|, ^^ ^ur
(Print Home Address)
?,Wl\d/L-s%£^rte Q>-M^ j ^ro^
(Print EmailAddress) <U -' ----- -(j-
EmaU to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] (Print Name)
^
(Print Home Address)
Oblection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood,

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the sun-ounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parkmg spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely lunited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setdng Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EDR. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its fmdings with substantial evidence; and the Fmal Effi. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to Ust all herein.

Please VOpi^O and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
//- ^D'^
(Date)
Ou^q(^ MC./) W^
(Print Home Address)
c^i0c/el7/^un^[/.^
mail Address)(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny ADprovaI for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housmg.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant envu-onmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR. and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
^^7 ^ /^ _ tl/^/23(Signature) C/ ^ (Date)
j/u ^T A/a^G^^ (Print Name)
/(^Z P^los ^o ^H^ff^h^ Be^ch r/h^Z^V^
(Print Home Address) ^^
l^ui\}^ l^^i^fl ^wT"^-^ . ^^
(Print Email Address)
EmaU to BB City Council; [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councamembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to VoteJW and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wai-ner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) aad is not considered to be affordable bousiag.

3. This monsbrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood ofpredommaatly 2 story high stmctures,

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominandy red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to sahirate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant enviromnental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENTyTHIS INSANE PROJECT!
^^^Tgnature) ' <£-•" " ' (Date)
L^ur^n Z/r^S
>rint Name)
^arA;^ ^,3^^? /^- ^^/^.
(Print Home Address)
/ fAA/UY} ^^i/^r}& ^ ^\1. ^
"{Fnnt Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] \
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range j&om $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housmg.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the sun-ounding structures when most other projects in HB are Iknited to 25 dwellmg units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Envu'onmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EER fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its fmdings with substantial evidence; and the Final EBR. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

Please VOT^ NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^JLd)J)ii-ao-^
(Signature) - ' (Date)
i\C/M^LL9 TEW\LL
(Print Name)
^z^\ ^iz^c/UFT W-. H^^y^-^Z&M-}
(Print Home Address)
e?a^cM^il^ ^ ^w^^< c6(<A
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] '^
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chlca Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that mclude but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for tbe surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housmg.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling uuits-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are ab-eady overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Envu-onmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental unpacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Fual EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQAtoo numerous to list all herein.

Please V^TE Nd>and DEN>7X^[!/INS4NE Pgi^fcT!
)l"'i^-^0^^
(Date)
(Priny^an^T'
Y^/)/ f^^.
(Print Some Addn
sA^
//6i°
^'<1
^//. ^0/L^.
(Print Email Addres
EmaU to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Obiection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and DenyAEproval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Hunfington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood ofpredommantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

6. The grossly inadequate 1 89 parkmg spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EGR. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
_^ _ //-^>-^(Signatupe^/ ^ (Date)
^ ^7^ s-/7^ /^-^^/
(Print Name)
/°t 0^-1 I^^Pe^l^^^ ^^^Vf^f^r^^ %^^-^ /
(Print Home Address) r^r
_^/)^j> n^~ PcT./r^f C^) ^]I^T1^^\ , ^ ^
(Print Email Address)
Email to BOB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City CouncUmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood,

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) aad is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the sunrounding structures when most other projects m HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settmg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant enviromnental impacts of this project; and the EDR. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
^^G?-/fe^-^""' " -^-z/
(Signature) (Date)
^^<-^a ^-^(gS
(Print Name)
^'^r ctW^ /^> H;fc>. ^^^/^
(Print Home Address)
£^)-e^^Us&> •Pi\r^H^v^ •c^v^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council; [email protected], Robin.Estanislan^Surfcity-hb.org Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntingfon Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Cluca Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Waruer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood ofpredominandy 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are lunited to 25 dwellmg units-per-acre.

Spillover parkmg will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or midgate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VOTg^^d DE^Y TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
^Lli/^/z^
(Signature) ' <T^ ' (Date)
CHock
(Print Name)
.Z 1^5 SurPS^E- A^C 5u^ci^A- W
(Print Home Address)
Chuck. (^ YQL^ iAj^r^/s-^/vr DfLc-^^ ^^er. C^/T}
(Print Email Address]
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] F ikes. Cathy
From: Thomas Tien <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 3:57 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project
Attachments: Objection Letter.pdf
Hello,
Please see my attached letter. Thank you.

Thomas Tien
Objection Letter to Hunttneton Beach Citv Coundtmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilinembcrs, I UFRC you to Vote NO and 2£nSLAjBE£Oi2lforthc proposed Botsa Chica Senior Living Communtty Project .SCH No. 20221 10Q40 located at 4952 nnd 4972 Warncr Avenue, Huntington Brach, CA. 92649 (cross -streets: Warncr Avenue and Bolsa <:hi'ca Street).

J; strongly object to tins project for many vafkt reasons tlias tnctude but arc not Hmitcd to tlic following objccttons;

1. Tills hij.'h-dcnsily Hi); Box High Risc Apartment Building is too massive i" si/f, proportion. -scope, and density for tlu? stifidundin}' lu'ifhhorhood.

2. The proposvtl apnrtmcnl rciU prices will ronyc (rom S5,000 to $10,000 per inontli ($120,000 per year) and is Opt considered to be affordable housing.

3. 'rhis inonstrosity will be 6 sloric.s hif,h nwasuring 72 (cct from the curli to Ihe rooftop parapcl in a nciyhbnrhooil of predominantly 2 stoiy higli .slnicti.n'cs.

4. Built on d Zero Lot line with only a 10 fed setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy majnr tr.if'tic ii)(i;rsccli()n in Hunlington licacli.

S. It will be an astoiushing 69 tlwcliinj.; units-pcr-acrc bclicinolh thai is 5.4x larger than tlu: surrounding structures when most other projects in HI) are limited to 25 dwelling unils-per-ncre.

6. The grossly inadequate 1 <S9 parking spaces for 202 iipimmcnt units lio not provide any parking .sp.-ice.s for visitors, cu&lomcrs of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and servici; irucks.

Spiilover parking wil] saturate ttu- area with overflow parking on streetN ttiat arc alrft'idy overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly rcd.curbed area lliat is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve,
?, The "Senior Living Conuminily1* label for this Big Box is intentionally miiileading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The rcninining 102 units will bu renteti to wcaitJiy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a prcccdent-sclting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to salurat<; this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Suri'Cily" beach commimiity.

9. The Hnvironmenlal Impact Report ("lilR") fuf this project fails to adequately identity, analyze, M miligate (he many significant cn\fjronmcnial impacts oftliis project; and the KIR fails to provide and-analy/.c an accurate • and complete project description; and the 1-;1R fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of t'HQA; and the lilR's anah'&is nfcnmiiliitivc iinp.ict.s is dericient; and (lie EIR's ai»aiysis ofalteniatives is ^uftcient; and (lie HIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final IHR fuils to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the HIR and CEQA \oo numerous )<» list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spat Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and comiption. The Cily ofiluntington Bench lacks substantial evidence to suppon (lie "fitnlinys" for /.oninp, M;»p Amendment, /.onins Text Arncnrimcnt, <'HI({ ('otKtitionnl Use Permit ainonc.st multiple odivr violations of I luntmpfon Bc.'icti City Co{ic, regulations, and CvStablishcd and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS 1NSANK PROJKCT!
<
-..^^ ...-.-.-...„.-_.. J"]Llll^A
(Si^n.-mirv) " (Date)
"tb>^tt 7<M
(Print Name)
M^J .iifejCir-^l^j^M^-^A^
(Print I tome Address) • v ' .—-„._„
rH-€l!fr^^ite^/Li^^.._^^^^^^^
(Print Kmail Address) ~ ~~-
Email to HB City Council; City.Council/Hsitrfcity-lih.ot-K, RolHn.E&tHni<Jnii(ft.Siirfcity-tTKbi^ " ^ Fikes, Cathy
From: Kirk Crawford <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 2:45 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Proposed Senior Living Project
Attachments: Senior Living Project.pdf
I am not in favor of this high density project.

Please vote no.

See attached
Virus-free.www.avast.com
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
S^V ^^0-^-uA— _ ^-^^3(Si^fTatu-^) r - / ) (Date)
-J- (^-.^^E^-?o^>
(Print Name)
€t^l D&^^ Or. H^t Q^.
(Print Home Address)
/ar^^Y° ^>r^, /.^>^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Ginny C <[email protected]>
Friday, December 1, 2023 2:24 PM
CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Estanislau, Robin
Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Proposal
Senior Living Prqjectl.pdf
I am against this project!!
See attached
Virus-free.www.avast.com
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
\)A^JL^^_ . C/\^ '' ^^ _ ?-£<:-. I / 201^.
(Signature)^ /) ^ (Date)
Vimi/uoL. (^'r^.uj'Fo^^
(Print NaMe)
^wi ^^-^^ D^. H.8.
(Print Home Address)
<u^~F^t4-^<^ i/\A^ 6) ^-^n/-^<>^
rint Email Addre(Print Email Addrc
Email to KB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes. Cathy
From: Subscriptions Subscriptions <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 1:03 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Letter of Objection from Neighbors
Attachments: Objection to Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community.pdf To Whom It May Concern,
Please see my attached Letter of Objection to the Bolsa Chica Senior Living Center.

Thank you,
Michele Hurlbut
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($ 120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 stoiy high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
/V\ .jjfVX^ 12/1,2023
(Signature) (Date)
Michele Hurlbut
(Print Name)
16931 Canyon Ln, Huntington Beach, CA 92649
(Print Home Address)
[email protected]
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 10:27 AM
To: 'Kathy O'Connor-Phelps'; Kalmick, Dan; Bolton, Rhonda; Moser, Natalie; Strickland, Tony; Van Der Mark, Gracey; Burns, Pat; [email protected] Cc: Gates, Michael; CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Subject: RE: 5-story Bolsa Chica Senior Living Center planned for the corner of Warner and Bolsa Chica
Tony, et al, I am adamantly against this monster of a project at Bolsa Chica/Warner. This area, this intersection is unbelievably crowded and traffic is ridiculous. I avoid it at all cost. I live near Edinger and Bolsa Chica. There are times when there are 25+ cars x 2 in the left hand turn lane on Bolsa Chica turning onto Warner. Sometimes double that in the left turn on Warner turning onto Bolsa Chica.

Any car(s) coming from 405 or any where down that stretch of Bolsa Chica (which now looks Like PCH mid summer), MUST go left to a D turn to get to the proposed project. What a traffic nightmare. Even Warner going West has as many as 75-100 cars at that stop light.

This size of building is horribly out of place and makes no sense (hence the Planning restrictions). My mother was at Merrill Gardens on Goldenwest near Warner. That location makes sense, traffic wise, height wise, shadow wise etc. Easily accessed from Goldenwest. No back ups,, ample parking. This huge proposed project makes NO SENSE at this location, period. The name "Senior" is misleading, as it's a 55+. I support REAL senior housing that includes care, like Merrill Gardens, in appropriate locations. This proposal is terrible for the area and horrible for HB. PLZ VOTE NO.

I have hugely supported y'all from day one. To approve a project like this, makes no sense and would change my position and support if indeed approved. After all the good that has been accomplished, I would actually be terribly disappointed and saddened. Don't turn on the 40K+ that have and still do support you.

Chip Clustka
ON AIR W.C.
213-305-1970 Mobile
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 11:35 AM
To: 'KathyO'Connor-Phelps' <[email protected]>; 'Kalmick, Dan' <[email protected]>; 'Bolton, Rhonda' <[email protected]>; 'Moser, Natalie' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <casey.mckeon@surficity- hb.org>
Cc: 'Gates, Michael' <[email protected]>; 'CITY COUNCIL' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: COUNCIL MEETING 10/23/2023 Yet another victory Congrats for another victory for common sense. STAY THE COURSE!!! Y'all continue to have the mandate, despite the turnout of the "sky is falling" crowd.

Kaldick with a big CYA after his involvement w/ the OCPA, nice try. The majority of the electorate are behind you 100%. Stay true to your campaign promises, as you have been, we all appreciate it. Mosser can't understand why we continue to reverse and eliminate what the previous Council has put in place................uhhhh, duh!! Very proud of you all, stay the course.

Chip Clustka
ON AIR W.C.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 8:53 PM
To: 'KathyO'Connor-Phelps' <[email protected]>; 'Kalmick, Dan' <[email protected]>; 'Bolton, Rhonda' <[email protected]>; 'Moser, Natalie' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <casey.mckeon@surficitv- hb.org>
Cc: 'Gates, Michael' <[email protected]>; 'CITY COUNCIL' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: COUNCIL MEETING 9/21/2023 Stay the course
You have the mandate. Send these amendments to a vote of the people! The libs do not trust the people, that's why they are so opposed to all of this.

Same libs speaking, they are NOT the 40,000 that voted for you four. STAY THE COURSE! Bolton, still unelected,STFU!!
Chip Clustka
ON AIR W.C.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 5:48 PM
To: 'KathyO'Connor-Phelps' <[email protected]>; 'Kalmick, Dan' <[email protected]>; 'Bolton, Rhonda' <rhonda.bolton@>surfcitv-hb.org>; 'Moser, Natalie' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; 'Rracey.vandermark@)surfcitv-hb.orR' <Rracev.vandermark(a)surfcity-hb.orR>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <casey.mckeon@surficity- hb.orR>
Cc: 'Gates, Michael' <Michael.Gates@)surfcitv-hb.org>; 'CITY COUNCIL' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: COUNCIL MEETING 6/20/2023 Another win for common sense Thanks all for the courage to address this mounting issue of inappropriate material in our library, and schools and the proliferation of if you disagree you're a bigot or homophobe. Helluva job Gracy, et al.

Mosser your diatribe was full of misleading misinformation and outright lies. You think we "extremists" your term, don't see right through it. BOOK BAN, BOOK BAN, BOOK BURNERS, NAZIS. Liar. Simply common sense in giving heads up to parents and PROTECTING OUR CHILDREN, PERIOD!! Hypocrite, as you decry Hate Speech, while doing the same, just directed towards the right.

Checks being placed on this ludicrous idea that this garbage is appropriate for kids, is very simple, so spin away. We the people of HB have a mandate, 40,000+ strong. You can rally a few hundred, we have 10's of thousands, Thank God! Bolton, UNELECTED, laughing and snickering at Gates comments. You couldn't carry his jock. And using the Lord's name in vane while on mic, tells it all, soulless. Keep it up, you are showing your true colors.

We are not Florida, we are not Texas, we are THE concerned citizens and parents of HB and we will continue the good fight for what is decent and for what is right. ALL, can do whatever they want, lifestyle, gender, beliefs, etc. We have the right to disagree as the left disagrees w/ plenty. Shoving this down our throats is a losing proposition; you may have to deal with that.

Vaya con Dios!
Chip Clustka
ON AIR W.C.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 12:37 PM
To: 'KathyO'Connor-Phelps' <[email protected]>; 'Kalmick, Dan' <[email protected]>; 'Bolton, Rhonda' <[email protected]>; 'Moser, Natalie' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <casev.mckeon@surficity- hb.org>
Cc: 'Gates, Michael' <[email protected]>; 'CITY COUNCIL' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: COUNCIL MEETING 5/16/2023.... Vaya con Dios! Another fantastic night for the "Team", aka La Quatro Grande, and voting down item 24. I will keep this very short and very simple. Just look around the country, the state and the cities, crime, non-human attacks, corruption, cheating, lying and bad actions everywhere. Keep prayer, more prayer. What is the downside to grace, being thankful and asking for guidance.....???
THE MORE THAT GOD IS REMOVED FROM OUR SOCIETY AND EVERYDAY LIFE...............THE DARKER OUR WORLD BECOMES, and is becoming.

Vaya con Dios, para La Quatro Grande!
Chip Clustka
ON AIR W.C.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 9:59 AM
To: 'KathyO'Connor-Phelps' <[email protected]>; 'Kalmick, Dan' <Dan.Kalmick(5)surfcity-hb.orR>; 'Bolton, Rhonda' <[email protected]>; 'Moser, Natalie' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <Rracev.vandermark(5)surfcity-hb.orR>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <casey.mckeon@surficity- hb.org>
Cc: 'Gates, Michael' <[email protected]>; 'CITY COUNCIL' <citv.council(a)surfcitv-hb.org> Subject: RE: COUNCIL MEETING 3/21/2023.....THOUGHTS
Mayor Strickland, your explanation for NOT voting for this housing element was one of the best and most reasonable ones I have heard to date. This is exactly why we voted you and the three others in (winning by an enormous amount). That's a mandate!
The others scrambled to justify "the requirement" to sign off on the significant issues that may arise from all this added construction. DO NOT LAY DOWN FOR SACRAMENTO. I have lived in HB for nearly 40 years. I've seen the liberal policies destroy this beach town. The pier and its lack of enforcement is ruining the City's top tourist attraction, but that's for another email.

Y'all are supported by a huge majority of HB. Please stay true to ALL your promises. So far you have outperformed on that end, what a much needed breath of reasonable, make common sense air,y'all are!!! Keep it up.

We are all very proud of all four of you. You all come prepared and are doing the right things, which we are all very thankful for.

Bolton, still unelected, please resign.

MHBGA....... MAKING HB GREAT AGAIN!
Chip Clustka
ON AIR W.C.

From: Kathy O'Connor-Phelps <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 9:27 AM
To: Kalmick, Dan <[email protected]>; Bolton, Rhonda <[email protected]>; Moser, Natalie <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Gates, Michael <[email protected]>; [email protected]; CITY COUNCIL <city.council@surfcity- hb.org>
Subject; COUNCIL MEETING 3/21/2023.....THOUGHTS
Dear City Council:

I've watched so many meetings I can't even count how many any longer. I never did watch them until Mr. Ortiz was basically shamed and attacked to the point of resigning & then I realized it was time to watch these meetings to see what the hell was going on. I'm so glad I did this, because many residents don't know what's going on until it's too late. My goal will be to make sure the big three from the remaining Council never serve in this City ever again.

Thoughts from this week's meeting:

Dan - you keep proving what a whiny little b*tch you are. Treating our City Attorney, the way you did is not acceptable. Treating anyone like that is not acceptable. That is not the way a City Council member should act. You also have no backbone - "the state attorney is watching & I want to be on record..." you were probably one of those little kids that tattled all the time which would make sense the way you act. You should probably put the face diaper back on to stop the all-knowing whining BS that you spew. No wonder Mr. Burns would not answer any of your questions. I don't blame him. He doesn't answer to you. He answers to US.

Natalie - you preach kindness, inclusion, & respect, and then allude that Mr. Burns is a bully. Not a good look. Your attack tactics on the Council's 90-day plan is also not a good look for you when you've been on council for years and NOTHING had been accomplished until our wonderful police department could actually do their job. You're attacking because you know you're on the hot seat because this was your hot button issue & it's only now that things are starting to look better. I live downtown. I saw it every single day including homeless individuals breaking into our pool & sauna area to do sleep, shower, and do drugs.

Rhonda - the only apology residents want is from the previous council who ASSIGNED you this position.

Thank you Mayor Strickland, Mayor Pro tem Van Der Mark, Council Member McKeon, & Council Member Burns for setting the residents on the path of MAKING HB GREAT AGAIN! Kathy O'Connor-Phelps
Longtime HB Resident
Fikes, Cathy
From: mike iskander <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 10:19 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection to project SCH No.20221140
Attachments: 20231201_100006.jpg
Dear Huntington Beach city councilmember.

I urge you to vote NO and DENY APPROVAL for the Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community project SCH No. 2022110040 Please see attached letter regarding this matter.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Mike Iskander
[email protected]
|(^;i:;:i^i|i!|:i,'i!|;iillK^|^;:;^
|i!i;ll:;;!i!sl!Jililii!^^^^^^^^^^
iili^^^^
'%%.^^^^
IN^^^^^^^^^^."l'':':<l;-:i.;:^3;!!;:.?'""Nil;i;SSST<i,,i'i"'"''i. '•••":^" li'^i;!:^i!i^I?^l'l^;!:^?^?^
ii^M:^^''i^,:i:^.

I-;1:,;;;:-';1::; 'l!hir:rl;?;:"',.-IS.'-1-1/.;',.';
liW^iS^W^
\l^s:".
l:;liS,E;:;.ll'i^ ;::'&
i»";
Sk,
SRSit::
:I$'•M
:':-:;1:1*::,1
^sr.,
:1::10:11;1
'^
w
7\
^
i^
r
17\
^
\7'
I
'g
ift_
1^>
I
1c
}
Sj
&
^b
u^
00 0'. Ut
j'l-^lg
§ s" S>' S S 5F.2
ll-i:!ls!?rl1
iijli
sillsJlf3 2
<a a-
0 vs
S3'?
3 2 P :*
§-!s i
•; s? m v
8 s» y g
' a. ff"
II
0 0 --
"a-1-
1-8
0 ls:i-.^'£. -S. w^ V
?111§ 7:s.s.
{~ y n s-
§1?11.Ill-Sl
i" 2 ° 5-
3 J|*3
i-tu ?
iS^
£. i" S.ss" " ^
'• N
'2. v S
o r; s
o c" 5"
=-s~w
^ "
"i <n-
nn
•I
n
&.
g
M d. n »0- "~ m 3
=>^ &.

I PltiltS a-?j
S- ft "5
S~ m,3.
« s < —i
<<§
Ulll^jllljiltflillljllltJ®? 11 Is-l-'s I^-S §1
~L ?* —» a* *v c'"
s?'-^
r.

Os
0 y.t/:
'yi »•< n
I<3
s =- S
5' 2.
=:w.
§ ?
;- |o ? £' ?
E' n ^ ^^ 7/
.1II^i-I s-1 ^ t3§ |5-1
'i. '&. r- r. K
> << -5 •§ £ .?
S: — 5 2 —
H ? i 2 ?.

I ? = I 1'3
I- os- 3. 3 I' S
'£. 2^ 5. ''-^ ^
i.^-ii.^:i-l=-i-"^-
i I ?; ^ 73
'•r- 0 -i'
w: i. ^ =. s
00 £
Z 3 c- S
S:- 5. =?
E
'0-
0 0
<
0_
M
Sa-i-
5- n~ S.
& =1 0'
? °1»
Ill
£..-w'
"; gT M % a
nm—I S- 7- P y,'
n n tL 5
0 g

0. §
o82..^ "
B
s-1
11 M
^ TS
g-1
n.<B
5 i§
V.
5 •a
I
'-.V.t-L
e;^
^ ?o ^ rjo
.11111
§ °-^
111 i I". 5. =• ^
I§ 1-§S.?I
fl 11 ° p3B:I3K|c
f
M
0-n
•a
^ s g.
'^'^ V
=;'• i2. §
a- Ei 5a- 2.
n ~i °.'/'
^ E £ 5:/?sl^? i: 3 2^
G> Z. y
0 vi 5-.
.2-3<<' c
?1-
n- -^
3 ^
f-1•< s
0 3-
'11 §t

11.1-
=1 "'•
1-rjln os -e ^
c P g. £
a-
no- c;
r.
cs
c;=-S
S Z. 2.
£. =r "2. 2: S
v> a S" =•
3 " ^

1. itI g I
S 2. "^ ° = u
I II I i ^
i
0 V.

R
Vi

0. 6»
03 0
•i
EB
*-<:

Nn
(R
sn
»
V.
f>
03 C-
sre
c

5. P
^'.2.
'^
ES 0-
?ii £
3 0
t ^
5 G?0
N->
x(fl
s H sl1 "^ I
^B:IP
". <
ei
g
I-.I-I ^<-
iln
1^1
II2^
M
s.1
v, 5-
lls i§ § i.^
? I liEl 2 Jir&-ll
ld'y
£§'
n' n
n
VI
I
Q.
n
? ? ?~ ??' i ?• 9
2a S- S
g -' n n.
<< n 0 ='
< > 2 S
(K
?j
3 • £
vs •—
y' y
CT
0=
cs
p>:
s?
5 =
Fikes, Cathy
From: Kim Hendricks <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 9:04 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL.CMO STAFF)
Subject: Fwd: Letter to City Council
Attachments: Letter of Objection for Neighbors to SignJ 1 -23-2023.docx Forwarded message
From: Kim Hendricks <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:01 AM
Subject: Letter to City Council
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Please accept this letter and post it for the record at the next city council meeting Thank you,
Kim Hendricks
Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
Kt-i^t L n-eiA,o<ri,Gl%s Dec. 1,2023
(Signature) (Date)
Kim L.Hendricks
(Print Name)
5451 Overland Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92649
(Print Home Address)
[email protected]
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Mike Prendeville <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 8:41 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); [email protected] Cc: Aaron Woolley
Subject: High Rise Apartment Building zoning amendment at Warner and Bolsa Chica Attachments: 20231201_0bjection Letter to HuntinAon Beach City CouncOmembers .pdf Members of the City Council,
Please vote no and deny approval for the zoning amendment and construction of high rise apartments on the corner of Bolsa Chica Ave and Warner Ave. It will not enhance the lives of the current residents in any way shape or form. It is solely for the benefit of development interests and will tax and stress current infrastructure and well as traffic and public safety. We need to address current density issues in the city of Huntington Beach and building a 6 story apartment building on the corner ofWarner and Bolsa Chica is not the way to do it. I am a 55 yr resident of Huntington Beach and love our city. Please keep it healthy and pleasant for the current and future residents by addressing density issues in a safe and sane manner. Thank you all for your hard work and dedication to HB.

Sincerely,
Thomas E. M. Prendeville
FUNDAMENTAL #24: BE THE EXPERT
Our customers buy our services, but they're really buying our expertise. Be curious and become a lifelong learner. Confidence comes from superior knowledge. Be the expert that teaches and mentors others.

Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCU No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measurmg 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet m a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EFR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EBR. fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

Please VQTE NO and DENY THIS C^NE PftO^EQfL
/-?-;-^)^
(Signature) / (Date)
0 V.< «, ^ .-^L
(Print Name)
•^l^^^^c.&a Or ^/£)& /-/o^Uc/, ^A ^fci
int Home Address) ^(Print Home Address)
<^ J^4-;/v yi (J^v c. ^^ ^o^-iMm ^ o C'^l^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Gloria Gardiner <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 2:52 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Cc: GLORIA GARDINER
Subject: Objection Letter VOTE NO SrLiving Project SCH No.2022110040 Attachments: VOTE NO -SrSeniorLiving Prjct SCH No.2022110040 (Gardiner11-30-2023).pdf Below is attachment
VOTE NO -SrSeniorLiving Prjct SCH prjct SCH No. 2022110040 Gardiner 11-30-2023
AKA:

Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers,
I urge you to Vote No and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community.

Project SCH No. 2022110040 is located at
4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach, CA,.92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street)
I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that Gloria Gardiner
Fernhill HOA
16961 Ruby Circle
Huntington Beach, 92649
Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge yjxfto Vote NO a^nd Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Projec/SCq No. 2022J^0040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntiugton Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets :^awjfi£-Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high stmctures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please V/Djt'E NO and DEpfyTfflS INSANE PROJECT!
^L> ^l^e^ _____ (I-
(Signature/^f •; ^ r (Date)
wre^ f n <2^a^
(Print Name)
(Print Home Address)
iy^c?l -4^ ^«Az- "Ru ^ 6.v - iff
ddress)
\^C^^^&0^0^<LO^-
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Lylene Kirkwood <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 11:08 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Proposed Bolsa Chica senior living community
Attachments: Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers.pdf Objection Letter to
Dear Hunrington Beach City Councilmci
proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Con
Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA.
strongly object to this project for many vali

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise A
density for the surrounding neighborhoi
f The proposed apartment rent prices wil;
not considered to be affordable housing
^ This monstrosity is proposed at 5 stone
neighborhood of predominantly 2 story
Attached also in pdf format.

Thank you for your close consideration of my objections.

Lylene Kirkwood
01? j cction I,c(trr to llunlin y, (on Ikiicli C'il y Conncilmemlu'rs l)t';>r llunlin(;lon tlf.icti Cily C'nnncilnu'mln'r.s, I iir[;r ydii to \'olc NO null DenyA|i|)r(nnl for llic propiMCd llnts;! Cliic» .Sfnlm l.ivinn C'uinnumil? I'nijt'rl SC'II No. 202^11(1(1-)() IdCHlrd ul •<y52 nnd 4972 \\;irnrr ,\\rnue, llunlin[;lon Ili'm.'ll. t'A. ')2(i-<9 (frns slrrrls: Wnnit'r A\rnur unit lldlsn C'llicn Slrrrt). I slmn;:]\ "hjc>.'l to llii^ piojri;! lni in.iuy mliil ic.isiins llial inclmlL' lnil ;in' nul limilt'd 10 llie follDwinf olijcclinn'-. . Hn'- liii;li-i.lt'i]<iiy lliy Hi". lliyli l<i<r Apailmcnl Hinldmy is loo m.issivc in si/c, propnrljon, sciipc, and (!ciiMl\ In llli; •'untnuiilnn; ncitlliluirlioml
2, Uic rroposdl ,i|unnk'nt rein pi ires will liinye Iron) S5,0()0 In S1U.OOO pn monlh (S 12().00f) pLTyc;ir) ,ni(l is not con^ilcrcil Ir hi.' ;ilTortlal)lc liousing.

J. I'lns nuuistiosily is pri.'po.sctl ;it 5 slork's liinli but will lisc 72 (ccl I'rom lln' curb to llic roollop parapcl in a nciptiborliuoil <)l~pn.'doinin;inlly 2 star)' ]ii|j;h stniL-lurc.s. '. Built on a Zcio l.ol line willi only ,1 10 I'ect sclb.ick I'lom Ihc curb, iliis Hig Box will sprawl over 2.S ;icrcs croiviliny a busy niajor ti-dl'l'n: inlcnwlion in llunlinglon Bc-acli. ?• It will lie an astoni'.lnnt; 6') ilwclling >imls-|)rr-;icrL' bclieiuolh lh;H is 5.4x larycr tliiin tlic surroundin(; slniciurcs when inusl utlicr projects in IIB ;irc limilcJ to 25 tlwflliny unils-pcr-.icrc. . The {,'rossly inuilcquale ]S9 p.irkim; hp.n.'es Ib] 202 up.irtmcnl unils do nol provide iiny parking spncc.s for visilurs, CII.-.IOHILTS uflliu prnposed iTounil t1oor businesses, mitl a myriad ot'dclivcry and scn'icc trucks.

Spillnvcr [larkiny will salnr.itc tile ;ia';i willi overtlow parking on .strccls tli.it ;irc ;ilitf;nly overcrowded. There is cMn.'nii.'Iy limilcJ slrrcl pjrkinu in this prcduminanlly rcd-curbed arc;i llial is ;i m;ijor galcway to Ihe public Inking irails in the Uuki Chicu Hcoloyic.il Kcscrvi;.
. The "Senior LIMDU Conununily" l.ibel I'or this Big Box is inlcntioiuilly mi'.leailini; as only 100 oul ol'llii; 202 ap.irlincnl units arc tle'.iyiulcd I'or .is-.isicd care (less llian lialQ. The remaining 102 ui)iis wilt be rented la wculihy aiiuli lcn.ints wlio will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unil. i. Tl>i> Uiy Box is a prcccdcnl-setling Trojan Hurse lliiil will allow other ilevclupcrs to hauirate Itlis ;ire;i wilti more Big Uu\ higti riscb llial will tlcslroy our qiiicl "SlirfC'ily" bcacli community. . The I;nvir<innn;nial Impact Report ("lilR") for this project fails to ;i(lct|uatc[y idrntify, analy/c, or miliy.ile the many signil'icant yn\ ironnn'ntal iinpai;ls ol'lhis piojecl; ;ni(t the UIR fails to provide and .inalyze ;in uccnrale and complclc pmjvLl description; and ihr EIR I'ails to disclusc siynit'icnnl adverstf impacls in Violation nt C'1;OA: and Ihe 1;11(.\ unalysis of cumulative impacls is tlet'icicnl; and Ihe EIR's analysis or;illernulivi;s is <lel1cicnl; and llic KIR l.'iils lo support ils lindings willi subslanlial cvitlencc; und llic Fin.il EIK. tails lu atli;qu;tU-ly ri.'spmitl la I'ubln; conuiK'nl :ni)on(;'>t lliultipltf olllt'r violations ofllie E1R unil CL'QA loo mmu'rous lo lisi u]| hcrfin.
• Tlu\ proja-l is ;i blal.inl and hnprupcr ;uti;mpl lo Split /.oin' wliicli is tlic >ildc<I rccuynii'etl t'onn ut'zoniny si.'lieiiiiiiL' and wrruplion. Tlic C.'iiy til'llunlinylun Ik'acli lacks subsl.uili.il eviilcncc lu Mipporl llie "luicling'i" for Zoning Map Aincndnieiu, Zrtniny Tc\l Ainendincnl, aiut Conditional Use I'cnnit iimonyst nuiltiple olhcr violanuns Dfllunlini.slon Ucach Ciiy C'oile, h'gut.ilions, ;iml cslablishcil .Hit] ;ictfc|)lnl pr.icln.'es. rifiiirVorr.NOinttiUKNVnnsiNSANKrKojiXT! . , /
(.Smnmur
ii-ic von: NO nitd uLi-sv i ins I^SAJM. ri<(»,]i,t i;
_^^^A^--_-- ..-.-— _y/-^i^^3
re) (J (D:ilc)
^__^^^^)_
(I'nnl Name
_//7^ ^h M^^/^M^/bj^m^, c^ ^Lf€f
(1'inil llunn.'Aililn.'s',)
^{I^S^WL--^
ll Ail/lrcss) (I'nnl l.in.nl
Ijiliiil I" 1111 City Coinu'il ('in.Cnmn'il'K Mirlfilv-liti.in'K, l(nl)ln.I''.>il»ni'>l.m(".Snrrril,v-lili.(irt; Fikes, Cathy
From: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 9:07 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: OBJECTION LETTER PROJECT BOLSA CHICA SENIOR LIVING PROJECT Attachments: OBJECTION LETTER FOR PROJECT 2022110040.pdf Hello,
Please vote no on this project that is inappropriate for this location.

Crystal Budd
Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City Councilmembers Dear Hantington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huatington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high struchu-es.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major trafiHc intersection in Huntmgton Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
)^LA 11/30/'^z^
(Signature (Date)
\^[ l^l^y
(Print Nariid)
/^j C^l^ \^^^{A.^]Y^QY\^C^l^ CA ^fc^
(Print Home Address)
r^O\A^^-^\! ^ ffol. ^n^-
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Jeanine D. <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 11:02 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living.

Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Wamer Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:
• 1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.
• 2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.
• 3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.
• 4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.
• 5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in MB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre. • 6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks. Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and jQ£iiy_^Riy^al for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:
• This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.
(. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from S5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.
>. This monstrosity is proposed at 5 stories high but will rise 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.
t. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 2.8 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach. >. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre. >. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks.

Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve.
'. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaming 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit. i. This Big BOK is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community. '. The Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

I. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City ofHuntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Pleas^VOJ^yS'0'and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
/2-- 2-^- Z 3>
(Signature) <^ (Date)
Y^/-^^ F^^ n^c^^.
(Print Name)
/7/^ k<7/s i^ 6/r A<^^^ /^c^ ^^^
(Print Home Address)
rJb ^^ funx}^ 4. P ^^A^-o* C^ t^.
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: ('ity.Councili^.surfcitv-tib.org, [email protected] F ikes. Cathy
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Michael Orefice <[email protected]>
Wednesday, November 29, 2023 3:38 PM
Estanislau, Robin; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community - DENY APPROVAL Letter_of_Objection_for_Neighbors_to_Sign_11-23-2023 (1).pdf Please see attached. I live at 5342 Bonanza Dr, HB and I urge the council to deny approval of this proposed complex.

See attached.

Michael.

Michael Orefice
SVP of Operations
949.232.9835
SmartFinancial.com
Obiection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
MJ^ltld firt-ftfi^ 11 / 29 / 2023
(Signature) (Date)
Michael Orefice
(Print Name)
5342 Bonanza Drive, HB, CA 92649
(Print Home Address)
[email protected]
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: Gregory Manack <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 2:15 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Objection Letter Attachments: Objection Letter HB Council (MANACK).pdf
Huntington Beach City Council and City Clerk's Office,
Please see the attached correspondence concerning the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community. I strongly object to the project in its current form and would like to know which City Council Members voted in favor of this project.

Thanks in advance for your time and consideration in this matter.

Regards,
Gregory Manack
Objection Letter to Huntineton Beach City CouncUmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warncr Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $ 10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remainmg 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EFR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative unpacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the E1R and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

CIea^/^yE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
\A 2cl Nov Z'02?
(Signature) (Date)
9^Go^ NAN/^ic
(Print Name)
5o7f ^o^-Do tb^^,^JNr^6ToN ^fc~^/-/. C/\ cl2 6 i cf
(Prmt Home Address)
f\r-(Z^E' 8 (9 fc7^ ^ L' C^ M
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: nancy wise <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 10:41 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL CMO STAFF)
Subject: Vote No on Proposed Senior Housing Project
Council Members,
Please vote no on the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Housing Project. My husband and I are seniors living in the area and are opposed to this project as it is too tall, too big, would house too many residents, create traffic, and have a negative impact on the surrounding area.

Sincerely,
Bill and Nancy Wise
16809 Snapper Dr.

HB, Ca 92649
[email protected]
Sent from my iPhone
Fikes, Cathy
From: mary misloski <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 5:38 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF)
Cc: Estanislau, Robin
Subject: NO on Bolsa Chica Senior Living #2022110040
Attachments: Objection Letter to HB City Council.pdf
Sent from Mail for Windows
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councitmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Wamer Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing,

3. This monstrosity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.
4, Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("EiR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list ail herein.

Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: TrevorVandercapellen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 5:09 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Objection letter to proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Attachments: IMG_6652.jpg
We do not need another senior living center in HB/OC! Please deny approval of this building! Letter attached.

Objection Letter to Huntinston Beach City Couacilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntiugton Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street). I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion,scope, and density for the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing.

3. This monsti-osity will be 6 stories high measuring 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet m a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures.

4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 3.5 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection m Huntington Beach.

5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelUng uaits-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling umts-per-acre.

8. This Big Box is a precedent-settiDg Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community.

9. The Environmental Impact Report ("ETR") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR. fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EDR. fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the Effi-'s analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR- fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the E1R and CEQA too numerous to list all herein.

10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and con-uption. The City ofHuntmgton Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findmgs" for Zonin^Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations ofHuntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices.

Please VOTE NO and DENY TfflS INSANE PROJECT!
fA
(Signature) <^> y, ' (Date)f
/^^»^ {/^cj&^e^^i^^f ^2^
2^z '^^/IL^
(Print Name) /
<^z^
^7^(fc -Dff—^ T^-
(Print Home Address)
1/^><^C/-<2 ^^Cc^^C^^fo-of^.t^-^-^
(Print Email Address)
Email to HB City Council: [email protected], [email protected] Fikes, Cathy
From: glpoli <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 3:27 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Bolsa Chica Senior Living Warner & Bolsa Chica Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmembers,
I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No.
2022110040
located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).

I strongly object to this project for many valid reasons that include but are not limited to the following objections:

1. This high-density Big Box High Rise Apartment Building is too massive in size, proportion, scope,and density for the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The proposed apartment rent prices will range from $5,000 to $10,000 per month ($120,000 per year) and is not considered to be affordable housing. 3. This monstrosity is proposed at 5 stories high but plans indicate it will rise 72 feet from the curb to the rooftop parapet in a neighborhood of predominantly 2 story high structures. 4. Built on a Zero Lot line with only a 10 feet setback from the curb, this Big Box will sprawl over 2.8 acres crowding a busy major traffic intersection in Huntington Beach. 5. It will be an astonishing 69 dwelling units-per-acre behemoth that is 5.4x larger than the surrounding structures when most other projects in HB are limited to 25 dwelling units-per-acre. 6. The grossly inadequate 189 parking spaces for 202 apartment units do not provide any parking spaces for visitors, customers of the proposed ground floor businesses, and a myriad of delivery and service trucks. Spillover parking will saturate the area with overflow parking on streets that are already overcrowded. There is extremely limited street parking in this predominantly red-curbed area that is a major gateway to the public hiking trails in the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve. 7. The "Senior Living Community" label for this Big Box is intentionally misleading as only 100 out of the 202 apartment units are designated for assisted care (less than half). The remaining 102 units will be rented to wealthy adult tenants who will presumably require 2 parking spaces per unit. 8. This Big Box is a precedent-setting Trojan Horse that will allow other developers to saturate this area with more Big Box high rises that will destroy our quiet "Surf City" beach community. 9. The Environmental Impact Report ("El R") for this project fails to adequately identify, analyze, or mitigate the many significant environmental impacts of this project; and the EIR fails to provide and analyze an accurate and complete project description; and the EIR fails to disclose significant adverse impacts in Violation of CEQA; and the EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is deficient; and the EIR's analysis of alternatives is deficient; and the EIR fails to support its findings with substantial evidence; and the Final EIR fails to adequately respond to Public comment amongst multiple other violations of the EIR and CEQA too numerous to list all herein. 10. This project is a blatant and improper attempt to Spot Zone which is the oldest recognized form of zoning scheming and corruption. The City of Huntington Beach lacks substantial evidence to support the "findings" for Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit amongst multiple other violations of Huntington Beach City Code, regulations, and established and accepted practices. Please VOTE NO and DENY THIS INSANE PROJECT!
Sincerely,
Ginger Leibfreid
Huntington Beach Resident
Fikes, Cathy
From: MarkTonkovich <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:55 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF); Estanislau, Robin
Subject: Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project
Objection Letter to Huntington Beach City Councilmembers Dear Huntington Beach City Councilmcmbers, I urge you to Vote NO and Deny Approval for the proposed Bolsa Chica Senior Living Community Project SCH No. 2022110040 located at 4952 and 4972 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (cross streets: Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street).