COMMUNITY AND
LIBRARY SERVICES
COMISSION STUDY
SESSION PRESENTATION
AND PROJECT UPDATE
NOVEMBER 9, 2022
PRESENTED BY: RJM DESIGN GROUPSite Analysis and
Community
Outreach
November 2022
PROJECT BACKGROUND
• July - November 2021, The City and RJM Design
Group Solicited Community Input and Conducted
Several Public Workshops (623 total participants)
• On November 16, 2021, City Council Approved
Conceptual Plan - Option C And Authorized Staff
T o Start Further Design Studies.
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
PROJECT BACKGROUND
• Additional Community Feedback Received Through
The Project Website and Staff After November 2021
(475+ website comments as of 9/29)
• On March 1, 2022, City Council Withdrew The
Previous Approval and Directed Staff T o Conduct
Further Community Outreach and Site Analysis
• The Goal Is T o Create A Greater Community
Consensus Followed By Appropriate Design
Development Studies and Planning Analysis for
Feasibility
• T wo Mailers Were Sent T o 10,000 Addresses
Within A One-Mile Radius Of Edison Park
and An Email Distribution List (521
Community Members) Is Used T o Notify
Residents About The Survey and Project
Updates
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
PROJECT TIMELINE
May 2022
Reinitiate Public
Awareness
May / June 2022
Conduct Site
T opographic Aerial
and Field Survey
May / June 2022
Conduct Arborist
Evaluation and Tree
Tagging
June 2022 Prepare
Arborist Report
Summary and Tree
Plan
June / July 2022
Synthesize
Information
August 4, 2022
Conduct In Person
Community
Workshop
August 5, 2022
Conduct Online
Virtual Survey
October 18, 2022
Informational Update
during City Manager’s
Report
November 9, 2022
Commission Study
Session (No Formal
Action)
Early 2023
Present Findings to
Commission and City
Council
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
PROJECT BACKGROUND
PROJECT WEBSITE
bit.ly/hbedisonpark
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
EXISTING CONDITIONS
• Edison Park is 28 acres
of City owned property
• SCE corridor is 5 acres
(operated and
maintained by City)
• School District Property
is 5 acres (open to
public)
• Former landfill site is
approximately 27 acres
• T otal publicly accessible
acreage is approximately
38 acres
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
EXISTING CONDITIONS
MELALEUCA TREES AT SOFTBALL OUTFIELD
FENCING
MELALEUCA TREES AT FIRE
STATION
MELALEUCA TREES AT FIRE STATION
SYCAMORE TREES AT COMMUNITY CENTER
PLAZA
TREES AT PARKING LOT
DROP OFF
EUCALYPTUS TREES AT
BASKETBALL COURTS
• 2022 Arborist Report Surveyed 234 Trees
• Report Recommends 67 Trees Be RemovedDue T o Hazardous Health Plus 15 Trees Based On Declining Health • Report Indicates 152 Healthy Trees
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
EXISTING CONDITIONS
• Full arborist report is available for
review on the project website
• Landfill conditions leading to differential settlement, concrete cracking and rebar exposure, closed tennis courts, leaning light fixtures, and ponding water
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
EXISTING CONDITIONS
CLOSED TENNIS COURTS SOFTBALL FIELDS
SAND AREA AT TOT LOTTOT LOT SCE CORRIDOR
BASKETBALL COURTS
TOT LOT EQUIPMENT SAND TOT LOT SCE CORRIDOR
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
CONCEPTUAL PLAN C – APPROVED NOVEMBER 2021, WITHDRAWN MARCH 2022
KEY ISSUES
Identified Between November 2021 and September 2022, Based on Conceptual Plan C:
(475+ website comments, emails, and feedback as of 9/29) • Do not remove trees
• Add more trees
• Keep soccer fields / add
more soccer
• Need space for lit soccer
fields
• No soccer
• Add more pickleball
• Renovate tennis / more
tennis
• No sports complex
• Leave park alone
• Add more open space
• T oo much light / noise from
park
• Support current Plan C
• Add dog park
• Keep handball / racquetball
walls
• Add skatepark / skate bowl
• Need restrooms
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
1) Trees
2) Soccer
3) Pickleball
4) Sports Park
5) Additional
Comments
IN PERSON COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3 124 PARTICIPANTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
1. TREES
Does the Conceptual Plan Tree
Replenishment Program Meet Your
Expectations?
Yes, No? If No, why?
IN PERSON COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Happy With The Increase In The Number Of Trees
• Want Trees For Shade
• Want 36” Box Size Trees Or Larger and No Palms
• Want Improved Landscaping With Native Plantings and
Water Conservation.
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Don’t Want Any Palm Trees Due To The Character/Aesthetic • Want Larger, Mature Trees For Shade
• Don’t Want Any Trees Removed Because New Trees Take
Too Long To Grow
• Want Only The Unhealthy Trees Removed and Replaced
With Those Of The Same Species Or Native Trees
• Want Less Soccer, Pickleball, Or Sport Facilities To Preserve Or Add To The Number Of Trees In The Park
• Want Improved Or Expanded Park Maintenance
2. SOCCER
Does the Conceptual Plan
Accommodate Soccer/Practice Needs?
Yes, No? If No, why?
IN PERSON COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Want A Larger / Full-size Field With Lights
• Lighting Shouldn’t Interfere With Neighbors
• Want One Less Field Included To Minimize Traffic
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Don’t Want Any Fields So Open Space, Native Landscaping, And Trails Can Be Maximized
• Want City To Utilize Other Parks Or School District Sites For Field Use and Parking
• Want One Less Field Included
• Overlay Fields On Softball Fields Won’t Work
• Don’t Want Lighting / Lighting Should Be Eliminated
• Traffic Impacts Are A Concern
• Softball Fields Take Priority Over Soccer Fields
3. PICKLEBALL
Does the Conceptual Plan
Accommodate Pickleball Needs?
Yes, No? If No, why?
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
IN PERSON COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Want More Courts Added
• Plan C Improves Current Court Conditions
• Want Online Reservations, Postings On Rules, Low Fencing Between Courts, And Flexible Court Space
• Want Tennis Courts Instead of Pickleball Courts
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Want More Tennis Courts, Not Pickleball Courts
• Want Less Courts
• Want Less Hardscape and Racquetball / Handball Courts Preserved
• Want All Courts To Be Overlay Conditions
• Want All Courts To Be Separate Uses
• Want More Open Space
• Want Pickleball Courts To Remain Behind Community
Center
4. SPORTS PARK
Does The Conceptual Plan Meet The
Original Vision For A Mixed-use Community
Park (Community Center, Sports Park,
Passive Areas, Walking Paths, Tree Canopies).
Yes, No? If No, Why?
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
IN PERSON COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Like The Soccer Fields, Pump Track, Skate Park and
Playground
• Want Benches, Bathrooms, Picnic Areas, A Dog Park,
And More Shade Trees
• Want More Support For Other Youth Sports Besides
Soccer
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Don’t Want A Sport Park Or Sports Complex
• Want Open Space, Shade Trees, Improved
Landscaping, Minimal Hardscape And Minimal
Improvements
• Don’t Want A Pump Track
• Want A Dog Park
• Don’t Want Increased Traffic Or Noise
• Want To Keep Racquetball / Handball Courts
5. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
IN PERSON COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3
Top Commments:
• We Need More Trees
• No New Parking Wanted
• Concept Plan C Is Not Supported
By The Community
• Use Edison High School Property For
Sports Fields And Parking
• Do Not Make This Park A Sports
Complex
• No Pump Track
• Adding Sports Fields Will Increase
The Parking And Traffic
• Do Not Cut Any Mature Trees
• No Soccer Fields
ONLINE SURVEY #3 450 PARTICIPANTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
1. TREES
Does the Conceptual Plan Tree
Replenishment Program Meet Your
Expectations?
Yes, No? If No, why?
ONLINE SURVEY #3
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Keep As Many Trees As Possible
• Plan Includes Additional Trees Beyond What Are Being
Removed
• Plan Provides More Trees For Shade
• Want More Trees
• Want More Shade
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Don’t Want Healthy Trees Removed
• Don’t Want Palms
• Want More Trees and Open Space
• Small Trees Take Too Long To Grow
• Want All Trees Removed To Be Replaced
• Want To Design Around Existing Trees
• Too Many Trees Are Being Removed
• Don’t Want Hardscape To Replace Trees
2. SOCCER
Does the Conceptual Plan
Accommodate Soccer/Practice Needs?
Yes, No? If No, why?
ONLINE SURVEY #3
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Plan Accommodates Community Needs
• Plan Adds More Places To Play And Practice
• Want Lighting For Fields
• Want To Preserve Existing Trees
• Want To Accommodate Softball Uses
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Want Less Soccer Or No Soccer Fields
• Don’t Want To Remove Trees To Add Soccer Fields
• Want To Add More Trees
• Want More Open Space
• Soccer Needs Are Met At Other Schools / Facilities
• Don’t Want Sports Complex
• Don’t Want Increased Parking
3. PICKLEBALL
Does the Conceptual Plan
Accommodate Pickleball Needs?
Yes, No? If No, why?
ONLINE SURVEY #3
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Plan Accommodates Community Needs
• Want More Pickleball Courts
• Want More Tennis Courts
• Want To Preserve Existing Trees
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Want More Pickleball Courts
• Want To Keep The Existing Courts The Same
• Want Less Pickleball Courts
• Want To Keep The Existing Handball / Racquetball Courts • Want To Preserve Existing Trees
• Want To Add Open Space
• Want Separate Pickleball and Tennis Courts
• Don’t Want So Many Sports and Activities
4. SPORTS PARK
Does The Conceptual Plan Meet The
Original Vision For A Mixed-use Community
Park (Community Center, Sports Park,
Passive Areas, Walking Paths, Tree Canopies).
Yes, No? If No, Why?
ONLINE SURVEY #3
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Summary Of “Yes” Responses:
• Supports Pump Track
• Plan Accommodates Community Needs
• Want More Pickleball Courts
• Want More Parking
• Happy With The Amount Of Activities
• Want Expanded Skatepark and Bike Park
Summary Of “No” Responses:
• Want More Opens Space and Trees
• Don’t Want So Many Sports / Activities, Soccer
• Don’t Want Traffic, Parking, Noise, Crowds
• Want More Handball / Racquetball Courts
• Want To Keep Park The Same
• Want More Tennis and More Pickleball
• Want Only Minor Upgrades
• Don’t Want Pump Track
• Want More Parking
5. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
ONLINE SURVEY #3
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
FAQ - BASED ON FEEDBACK FROM WORKSHOP #3 AND ONLINE SURVEY #3 • How Will Traffic and Parking Be Addressed?
• Will The Proposed Plan Increase Traffic During Games / Practices? • What Size and / Or Species Are The New Trees?
• Where Will New Trees Be Planted?
• Why Are Handball Courts Being Removed?
• Why Build A New Pump Track When A BMX Park (Sheep Hills) Is Nearby?
• What About Other Sports Besides Soccer?
• Are So Many Pickleball Courts Needed?
• Where Are The Walking Paths?
• Will The Fields Have New Lighting? What Type?
• What Is The Maintenance Budget?
• What Is Lost Due T o The Planned New Development?
• How Will The New Development Affect Existing Wildlife? • Why Does The Plan Remove 48-year-old Mature Trees?
Key IssuesBackground Workshop #3
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Answers can be found on
project website:
bit.ly/hbedisonpark
IN PERSON COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #3 COMPARED TO ONLINE SURVEY #3 RESULTS Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
IN PERSON
124 PARTICIPANTS
ONLINE
450 PARTICIPANTS
TREES
SOCCER
PICKLEBALL
SPORTS PARK
TREES
SOCCER
PICKLEBALL
SPORTS PARK
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
IN PERSON ONLINE
ONLINE SURVEY #3 RESULTS – 1,000’ RADIUS COMPARISON
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
INSIDE
1,000’ RADIUS
82 PARTICIPANTS
OUTSIDE
1,000’ RADIUS
368
PARTICIPANTS
Online Residents Outside Of 1,000’ Radius Of Edison Park Online Residents Within 1,000’ Radius Of Edison Park
Online Residents Outside Of 1,000’ Radius Of Edison Park 1,000’ Radius From Edison Park
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
TREES
SOCCER
PICKLEBALL
SPORTS PARK
TREES
SOCCER
PICKLEBALL
SPORTS PARK
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ONLINE – INSIDE 1,000’ RADIUS ONLINE – OUTSIDE 1,000’ RADIUS Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Based on Community Input Received from Project Beginning to Current* (9/29)
NEEDS MATRIX
NEEDS MATRIX – HIGHEST NEEDS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Trees / More Trees
Parking Lots /
Street /
Connectivity / EV
Charging / Traffic
Landscape /
Gardens / Drought
T olerant
Landscape
Open Space / No
Sports / Less
Sports / Open Play
Areas
Pickleball Courts /
Court Lighting
Picnic Areas /
Tables / BBQ’s /
Drinking Fountains
Playground /
Equipment /
Surfacing / Sand /
Fencing
Pump Track
Safety / Security /
Fencing /
Homeless
Skateboarding /
Skate Park / Skate
Spot
Aquatics / Pool /
Splashpad Basketball / Courts
Dog Area / Dog
Park Restrooms Soccer Fields /
Lighting T ennis Courts
Walking / Walking
Paths /
Accessibility
Clean / Cleanliness
/ Maintenance
Softball / Fields
Handball / Hitting
Walls / Racquetball
Courts
Based on Community Input Received from Project Beginning to Current* (9/29)
SITE DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
• Existing Landfill Conditions –
Varied Depth Of Waste, Varied Cap
Conditions, Differential Settlement
And Movement Visible
• Affecting T ennis Courts,
Playground, Ballfields, Concrete
• Existing Tree Health – Many In
Declining Health, Large Root Systems
That Won’t Fair Well With
Construction, Lack of Organic Matter
in Soil, Park Conditions that Aren’t
Conducive to Long Lifespans (30-50+
years), Urban Forest Replenishment
• Diverse Community Wants,
Needs, and Vision
SITE DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
Existing Landfill Conditions
• Geotechnical Report and Field
Investigations From 2021 Do Not
Indicate Differential Magnitudes Or Full
Limits Of Landfill Or Depths / Type Of
Waste
• Limits Of Landfill and Depth Of Trash
Compaction Need T o Be Confirmed
• Further Geotechnical Evaluations
Required T o Inform Structural and
Geotechnical Recommendations For
Any / All Types Of Improvements Within
Landfill Limits
• Analysis Will Help Determine Cost
Constraints and Design Opportunities
• Construction On A Landfill Site Is
Typically Much More Costly Than
Anywhere Else
POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
PARKING
1. Maintain Existing Parking Lot Layout, Preserve
Existing Trees
2. Connect 2 Southern Lots for Better Flow
3. Reorient Loading Zone / Drop Off At Skatepark
4. Add Parking Stalls West of Fire Station Within
Park Property, Connect T o Southern Lot
1 2
3 4
POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
SPORT COURTS / HITTING WALLS
1. Maintain Existing Basketball Court Footprints and
Preserve Existing Trees
2. Provide Hitting Wall on North Side of T ennis / Pickleball
TENNIS COURTS
3. Shift T ennis / Pickleball Courts West, T owards / Over Landfill Limits
1 3
2 POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
SOCCER FIELDS
1. Expand Existing U10 Soccer Field Footprint in SCE
Corridor to Create U14 Size Field with Modified
Walkways
2. Eliminate Proposed Soccer Field Overlays in Softball Fields to Preserve Outfield Fencing and Existing Trees
PUMP TRACK / SKATE PARK
3. Maintain Proposed Footprint of Pump Track
4. Maintain Proposed Footprint of Skate Park
1 2
3 4
POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
OPEN SPACE and TREES
1. Maintain Perimeter Open Space and As Many Healthy
Trees as Possible, Provide New Trees to Continue
Urban Forest Population
2. Maintain as Many Existing Walkways as Possible
1 1
1 1
POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS # 1
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
1. Maintain Existing Basketball Court Footprints
2. Provide Hitting Wall on North Side of T ennis / Pickleball
3. Shift T ennis / Pickleball Courts West, T owards / Over Landfill Limits
4. Expand Existing U14 Soccer Field Footprint in SCE Corridor with Modified Walkways
5. Eliminate Proposed Soccer Field Overlays in Softball Fields
6. Maintain Existing Parking Lot Layout
7. Connect 2 Southern Parking Lots
8. Reorient Loading Zone / Drop Off At Skatepark
9. Add Parking Stalls West of Fire Station Within Park Property
10. Maintain Proposed Footprint of Pump Track
11. Maintain Proposed Footprint of Skate Park
13 2
4 5
6 7
8 10 11
9 Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
13 2
4 5
6 7
8 9
5 10
11 1. Maintain Existing Basketball Court
Footprints
2. Provide Hitting Wall on North Side of
T ennis / Pickleball Courts
3. Shift T ennis / Pickleball Courts West,
T owards / Over Landfill Limits
4. Expand Existing U14 Soccer Field
Footprint in SCE Corridor with Modified
Walkways
5. Eliminate Proposed Soccer Field
Overlays in Softball Fields
6. Maintain Existing Parking Lot Layout
7. Connect 2 Southern Parking Lots
8. Reorient Loading Zone / Drop Off At
Skatepark
9. Add Parking Stalls West of Fire Station
Within Park Property
10. Maintain Proposed Footprint of Pump
Track
11. Maintain Proposed Footprint of Skate
Park
12. U10 Soccer Field Footprint in SCE
Corridor with Modified Walkways
• Existing Healthy Trees to Remain
(Per 2022 Arborist Report) = 110
• Existing Healthy Trees to be
Removed (Based on Plan
Refinements) = - 25
• New Trees = + 200
• New Parking Stalls (186 existing)
= + 44
POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS # 1
12 POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS # 2
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
UTILIZE PLAN C LAYOUT WITH THE FOLLOWING
MODIFICATIONS:
4. Expand Existing U10 Soccer Field Footprint in SCE Corridor with Modified Walkways
5. Eliminate Proposed Soccer Field Overlays in Softball Fields to Preserve Outfield Fencing and Existing Trees
9. Add Parking Stalls West of Fire Station Within Park Property Constructing outside of landfill limits for cost-effectiveness and longevity of hardscape elements.
4 5
9 Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
1. Expand Existing U10 Soccer Field
Footprints (2) to fit U14 Soccer
Field in SCE Corridor with
Modified Walkways
2. Eliminate Proposed Field Overlays
in Softball Fields to Preserve
Outfield Fencing and Existing
Trees
9. Add Parking Stalls West of Fire
Station Within Park Property
1 2
• Existing Healthy Trees to Remain
(Per 2022 Arborist Report) = 95
• Existing Healthy Trees to be
Removed (Based on Plan
Refinements) = - 50
• New Trees = +200
• New Parking Stalls (186 existing)
= + 74
POTENTIAL PLAN REFINEMENTS # 2
9 1
Key IssuesBackground Workshop
Results
Online Survey
#3 Results
Outreach
Comparison
Plan
Refinements
• Provide and Maintain Trees and Open Space With Drought T olerant and Water Wise Landscapes • Provide and Maintain Passive Recreation Opportunities With Open Space, Picnic Areas, Shade, Seating, and Drinking Fountains • Provide Safety and Security With Lighting and Fencing • Improve The Playgrounds With All-inclusive Elements and Opportunities • Provide ADA Compliance With Connectivity T o Walkways, Amenities and Facilities • Update Park Maintenance Planning
• Maintain and Expand Sport Court Opportunities T o Meet Community Desires
PLAN ELEMENTS
NEXT STEPS
EARLY 2023
• Staff And RJM Will Process Feedback Received This Evening • Present Options T o Commission For Recommendations T o City Council • Present Recommendation to City Council for Approval
THANK YOU
Site Analysis and
Community
Outreach
November 2022