Huntington Park City Council
August 2, 2022

1.029
February 2020
Average
11,581
13,959
10,811
11,976
16,052
12,053
August 2020
Average
12,711
14,310
12,280
12,328
16,084

1.002 1.019

1.025
Peak
Hour
AM
PM
August to February
Seasonal Factor

1.098

1.025 1.086

1.136
2/4/2020 2/5/2020 2/6/2020
Caltrans PEM I-710 Mainline Count Comparisons
Table B
AM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
8/11/2020 8/12/2020 8/13/2020
13,100
13,488
12,117
13,261
11,754
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash Project
Traffic Impact Analysis
19278
Apx - 30

APPENDIX E

LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
Apx - 31
Existing
Apx - 32
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.547
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 114 106 87 27 62 28 33 498 53 46 734 15 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 28 26 22 7 15 7 8 125 13 11 183 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 109 101 83 26 59 27 32 477 51 44 702 14 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 89 73 23 52 24 28 420 45 39 618 12 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 33
Intersection V/C 0.547
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.23 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 34
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.386
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1 0 0 13 2 59 42 614 3 1 762 2 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 3 1 15 11 153 1 0 191 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 1 0 0 12 2 56 40 583 3 1 724 2 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 1 0 0 11 2 49 35 513 3 1 637 2 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 35
Intersection V/C 0.386
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.24 0.24 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 36
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.602
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 71 473 115 98 174 7 19 513 81 98 701 136 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 18 118 29 25 43 2 5 128 20 25 175 34 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 68 452 110 94 166 7 18 490 77 94 670 130 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 60 398 97 83 146 6 16 431 68 83 590 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 37
Intersection V/C 0.602
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.26 0.26 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 38
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.641
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 75 126 82 50 153 45 60 961 202 79 943 31 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 19 32 20 13 38 11 15 240 50 20 236 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 73 123 80 49 149 44 59 938 197 77 920 30 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 71 120 78 48 145 43 57 912 191 75 894 29 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 39
Intersection V/C 0.641
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.30 0.13 0.05 0.30 0.30 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 40
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.447
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3 1 2 31 0 161 61 1072 0 1 949 18 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 0 1 8 0 40 15 268 0 0 237 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 3 1 2 29 0 153 58 1018 0 1 902 17 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 3 1 2 28 0 149 56 989 0 1 877 17 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 41
Intersection V/C 0.447
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 42
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.754
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 101 309 139 174 608 16 45 851 170 149 819 119 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 25 77 35 43 152 4 11 213 42 37 205 30 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 99 304 137 171 598 16 44 837 167 146 805 117 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 295 133 166 581 16 43 813 162 142 782 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 43
Intersection V/C 0.754
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.09 0.29 0.29 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 44
Existing Plus Project
Apx - 45
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\AM EP.pdf 9/7/2021
Vistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

NB Right 0.010 10.4 B
HCM 6th
Edition Two-way stop Project East Dwy (NS) atFlorence Ave (EW) 4 Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.605 - B
State St (NS) at Florence Ave
(EW) 3
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.390 - A
Mission Pl (NS) at Florence
Ave (EW) 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Right 0.550 - A
Mountain View Ave (NS) at
Florence Ave (EW) 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 46
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.550
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 114 106 89 28 62 28 33 501 53 47 737 17 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 28 26 22 7 15 7 8 125 13 12 184 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 109 101 85 27 59 27 32 479 51 45 705 16 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 2
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 89 73 23 52 24 28 420 45 39 618 12 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 47
Intersection V/C 0.550
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.24 0.24 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 48
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.390
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7 1 8 13 3 59 42 614 8 7 762 2 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 0 2 3 1 15 11 153 2 2 191 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 1 8 12 3 56 40 583 8 7 724 2 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 6 1 8 0 1 0 0 0 5 6 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 1 0 0 11 2 49 35 513 3 1 637 2 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 49
Intersection V/C 0.390
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.24 0.24 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 50
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.605
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 72 473 115 98 174 9 22 521 85 98 704 136 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 18 118 29 25 43 2 5 130 21 25 176 34 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 69 452 110 94 166 9 21 498 81 94 673 130 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 8 4 0 3 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 60 398 97 83 146 6 16 431 68 83 590 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 51
Intersection V/C 0.605
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.26 0.26 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 52
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.010
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 7 635 0 0 791
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 2 159 0 0 198
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 7 603 0 0 751
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 7 8 0 0 6
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 524 0 0 656
Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 53
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.05
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.36 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 10.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 2 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 54
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\PM EP.pdf 9/7/2021
Vistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

NB Right 0.032 12.8 B
HCM 6th
Edition Two-way stop Project East Dwy (NS) atFlorence Ave (EW) 4 Signalized ICU 1 EB Thru 0.766 - C
State St (NS) at Florence Ave
(EW) 3
Signalized ICU 1 EB Thru 0.557 - A
Mission Pl (NS) at Florence
Ave (EW) 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.654 - B
Mountain View Ave (NS) at
Florence Ave (EW) 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 55
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.654
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 75 126 90 56 153 45 60 969 202 81 949 35 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 19 32 23 14 38 11 15 242 50 20 237 9 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 73 123 88 55 149 44 59 946 197 79 926 34 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 8 6 0 0 0 8 0 2 6 4
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 71 120 78 48 145 43 57 912 191 75 894 29 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 56
Intersection V/C 0.654
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.30 0.13 0.05 0.31 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 57
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.557
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16 3 15 31 3 161 61 1072 23 34 949 18 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 1 4 8 1 40 15 268 6 8 237 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 15 3 14 29 3 153 58 1018 22 32 902 17 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 12 2 12 0 3 0 0 0 22 31 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 3 1 2 28 0 149 56 989 0 1 877 17 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 58
Intersection V/C 0.557
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.30 0.30 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 59
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.766
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 107 309 139 174 608 24 51 864 178 149 836 119 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 27 77 35 43 152 6 13 216 45 37 209 30 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 105 304 137 171 598 24 50 849 175 146 822 117 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 6 0 0 0 0 8 6 12 8 0 17 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 295 133 166 581 16 43 813 162 142 782 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 60
Intersection V/C 0.766
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.30 0.30 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 61
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.032
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 12.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 15 1114 0 0 1001
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 4 278 0 0 250
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 14 1058 0 0 951
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 14 12 0 0 31
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 1017 0 0 894
Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 62
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.09
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.85 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 2.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 12.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 2 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 63
Opening Year (2023) Without Project
Apx - 64
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.560
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 117 109 89 28 64 29 34 513 55 47 755 15 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 29 27 22 7 16 7 9 128 14 12 189 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 112 104 85 27 61 28 33 491 53 45 723 14 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 89 73 23 52 24 28 420 45 39 618 12 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 65
Intersection V/C 0.560
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.24 0.24 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 66
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.395
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1 0 0 13 2 61 43 632 3 1 785 2 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 3 1 15 11 158 1 0 196 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 1 0 0 12 2 58 41 600 3 1 746 2 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 1 0 0 11 2 49 35 513 3 1 637 2 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 67
Intersection V/C 0.395
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.25 0.25 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 68
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.617
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 73 487 118 101 179 7 20 528 83 101 722 140 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 18 122 30 25 45 2 5 132 21 25 180 35 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 70 466 113 97 171 7 19 505 79 97 690 134 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 60 398 97 83 146 6 16 431 68 83 590 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 69
Intersection V/C 0.617
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.27 0.27 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 70
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.657
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 77 130 84 51 157 46 63 990 208 81 971 32 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 19 33 21 13 39 12 16 247 52 20 243 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 75 127 82 50 153 45 61 966 203 79 948 31 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 71 120 78 48 145 43 57 912 191 75 894 29 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 71
Intersection V/C 0.657
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.31 0.13 0.05 0.31 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 72
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.458
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3 1 2 32 0 166 63 1104 0 1 978 19 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1 0 1 8 0 42 16 276 0 0 244 5 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 3 1 2 30 0 158 60 1049 0 1 929 18 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 3 1 2 28 0 149 56 989 0 1 877 17 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 73
Intersection V/C 0.458
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 74
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.774
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 104 318 143 179 627 16 46 877 175 153 843 123 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 26 80 36 45 157 4 11 219 44 38 211 31 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 102 313 141 176 616 16 45 862 172 150 829 121 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 295 133 166 581 16 43 813 162 142 782 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 75
Intersection V/C 0.774
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.30 0.30 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year (2023) Without Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 76
Opening Year (2023) With Project
Apx - 77
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\AM OYP.pdf 9/7/2021
Vistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro Scenario 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

NB Right 0.010 10.4 B
HCM 6th
Edition Two-way stop Project East Dwy (NS) atFlorence Ave (EW) 4 Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.620 - B
State St (NS) at Florence Ave
(EW) 3
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.399 - A
Mission Pl (NS) at Florence
Ave (EW) 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Thru 0.563 - A
Mountain View Ave (NS) at
Florence Ave (EW) 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 78
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.563
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 117 109 91 29 64 29 34 515 55 48 759 17 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 29 27 23 7 16 7 9 129 14 12 190 4 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 112 104 87 28 61 28 33 493 53 46 726 16 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 2
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 89 73 23 52 24 28 420 45 39 618 12 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 79
Intersection V/C 0.563
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.24 0.24 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 80
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.399
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7 1 8 13 3 61 43 632 8 7 785 2 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 0 2 3 1 15 11 158 2 2 196 1 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 1 8 12 3 58 41 600 8 7 746 2 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 6 1 8 0 1 0 0 0 5 6 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 1 0 0 11 2 49 35 513 3 1 637 2 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 81
Intersection V/C 0.399
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.25 0.25 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 82
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.620
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 74 487 118 101 179 9 23 537 87 101 725 140 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 19 122 30 25 45 2 6 134 22 25 181 35 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 0.9560 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 71 466 113 97 171 9 22 513 83 97 693 134 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 8 4 0 3 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 60 398 97 83 146 6 16 431 68 83 590 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 83
Intersection V/C 0.620
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.27 0.27 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 84
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.010
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 7 654 0 0 814
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 2 163 0 0 203
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 7 621 0 0 773
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 7 8 0 0 6
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.03
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 1.1360 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 524 0 0 656
Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 85
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.05
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.44 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 10.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 2 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project AM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 86
Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\PM OYP.pdf 9/7/2021
Vistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro Scenario 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

NB Right 0.032 13.0 B
HCM 6th
Edition Two-way stop Project East Dwy (NS) atFlorence Ave (EW) 4 Signalized ICU 1 EB Right 0.786 - C
State St (NS) at Florence Ave
(EW) 3
Signalized ICU 1 EB Thru 0.571 - A
Mission Pl (NS) at Florence
Ave (EW) 2
Signalized ICU 1 WB Right 0.670 - B
Mountain View Ave (NS) at
Florence Ave (EW) 1
ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 87
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.670
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Mountain View Ave (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 173.00 100.00 100.00 86.00 100.00 93.00 123.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 77 130 92 57 157 46 63 998 208 83 977 36 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 19 33 23 14 39 12 16 249 52 21 244 9 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 0.9760 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 75 127 90 56 153 45 61 974 203 81 954 35 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 8 6 0 0 0 8 0 2 6 4
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 71 120 78 48 145 43 57 912 191 75 894 29 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 88
Intersection V/C 0.670
Intersection LOS B
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.31 0.13 0.05 0.32 0.32 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 89
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.571
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Mission Pl (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 45.00 110.00 100.00 100.00 47.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16 3 15 32 3 166 63 1104 23 34 978 19 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 1 4 8 1 42 16 276 6 8 244 5 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 15 3 14 30 3 158 60 1049 22 32 929 18 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 12 2 12 0 3 0 0 0 22 31 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 3 1 2 28 0 149 56 989 0 1 877 17 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 90
Intersection V/C 0.571
Intersection LOS A
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.02 0.31 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 91
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.786
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): -
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: ICU 1
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: State St (NS) at Florence Ave (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 130.00 100.00 100.00 135.00 100.00 100.00 101.00 100.00 100.00 182.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 110 318 143 179 627 24 52 889 183 153 861 123 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 27 80 36 45 157 6 13 222 46 38 215 31 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 0.9830 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 108 313 141 176 616 24 51 874 180 150 846 121 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 6 0 0 0 0 8 6 12 8 0 17 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 96 295 133 166 581 16 43 813 162 142 782 114 Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 92
Intersection V/C 0.786
Intersection LOS C
V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.10 0.31 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal group 5 2 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 10.00
Cycle Length [s] 120
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 93
Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.032
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Florence Ave (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 35.00 35.00
Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 15 1146 0 0 1031
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 4 287 0 0 258
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 0.9500 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 14 1089 0 0 979
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 14 12 0 0 31
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Rate 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.03
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 1.0290 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 1017 0 0 894
Name
Volumes
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 94
Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.09
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.04 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 13.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 2 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
9/7/2021
Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year (2023) With Project PM Peak Hour 3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Version 6.00-00
Generated with
Apx - 95

APPENDIX F

SIMILAR CAR WASH FACILITIES SURVEY DATA
Apx - 96
In Out Total In Out Total
Redlands 35 29 64 48 51 99 926
Rialto 29 29 58 67 67 134 944
Maximum 35 29 64 67 67 134 944
Location
Matt's Express Carwash Maximum Trip Generation Calculations Daily
Peak Hour
Morning Evening
Apx - 97
City of Redlands
Matt's Express Car Wash
SWC of Tennessee Street and Lugonia Avenue
24 Hour Driveway Counts
Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Entering Exiting

WB EB WB EB WB EB
0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
0:15 0 0 0:15 0 0 0:15 0 0
0:30 0 0 0:30 0 0 0:30 0 0
0:45 0 0 0:45 0 0 0:45 0 0
1:00 0 0 1:00 0 0 1:00 0 0
1:15 0 0 1:15 0 0 1:15 0 0
1:30 0 0 1:30 0 0 1:30 0 0
1:45 0 0 1:45 0 0 1:45 0 0
2:00 0 0 2:00 0 0 2:00 0 0
2:15 0 0 2:15 0 0 2:15 0 0
2:30 0 0 2:30 0 0 2:30 0 0
2:45 0 0 2:45 0 0 2:45 0 0
3:00 0 0 3:00 0 0 3:00 0 0
3:15 0 0 3:15 0 0 3:15 0 0
3:30 0 0 3:30 0 0 3:30 0 0
3:45 0 0 3:45 0 0 3:45 0 0
4:00 0 0 4:00 0 0 4:00 0 0
4:15 0 0 4:15 0 0 4:15 0 0
4:30 0 0 4:30 0 0 4:30 0 0
4:45 0 0 4:45 1 0 4:45 1 0
5:00 0 0 5:00 0 1 5:00 0 1
5:15 0 0 5:15 0 0 5:15 0 0
5:30 1 0 5:30 0 0 5:30 1 0
5:45 0 0 5:45 1 1 5:45 1 1
6:00 0 0 6:00 0 0 6:00 0 0
6:15 0 0 6:15 0 0 6:15 0 0
6:30 1 0 6:30 0 0 6:30 1 0
6:45 0 0 6:45 0 0 6:45 0 0 In Out Total
7:00 1 1 7:00 2 2 7:00 3 3 4 3 7
7:15 0 0 7:15 0 0 7:15 0 0 9 3 12
7:30 0 0 7:30 0 0 7:30 0 0 16 9 25
7:45 0 0 7:45 1 0 7:45 1 0 28 20 48
8:00 0 1 8:00 8 2 8:00 8 3 35 29 64
8:15 0 2 8:15 7 4 8:15 7 6
8:30 0 2 8:30 12 9 8:30 12 11
8:45 0 1 8:45 8 8 8:45 8 9
9:00 0 2 9:00 3 7 9:00 3 9
9:15 0 2 9:15 13 4 9:15 13 6
9:30 0 3 9:30 9 9 9:30 9 12
9:45 0 5 9:45 11 8 9:45 11 13
10:00 0 6 10:00 11 5 10:00 11 11
10:15 0 1 10:15 5 7 10:15 5 8
10:30 0 4 10:30 17 8 10:30 17 12
10:45 0 1 10:45 12 14 10:45 12 15
11:00 1 3 11:00 6 5 11:00 7 8
11:15 0 1 11:15 10 8 11:15 10 9
11:30 0 4 11:30 9 2 11:30 9 6
11:45 2 2 11:45 9 10 11:45 11 12
12:00 0 1 12:00 9 11 12:00 9 12
12:15 2 2 12:15 28 17 12:15 30 19
12:30 2 6 12:30 10 9 12:30 12 15
12:45 0 3 12:45 22 8 12:45 22 11
13:00 0 3 13:00 17 22 13:00 17 25
13:15 0 5 13:15 14 11 13:15 14 16
13:30 0 6 13:30 15 12 13:30 15 18
13:45 0 0 13:45 14 14 13:45 14 14
14:00 0 3 14:00 11 4 14:00 11 7
14:15 1 3 14:15 18 14 14:15 19 17
14:30 0 5 14:30 18 13 14:30 18 18
14:45 0 2 14:45 13 15 14:45 13 17
15:00 0 1 15:00 9 9 15:00 9 10
15:15 0 1 15:15 14 10 15:15 14 11
15:30 0 1 15:30 7 9 15:30 7 10
15:45 0 2 15:45 8 8 15:45 8 10 In Out Total
16:00 1 3 16:00 11 7 16:00 12 10 48 51 99
16:15 0 2 16:15 15 9 16:15 15 11 45 44 89
16:30 0 2 16:30 13 10 16:30 13 12 33 41 74
16:45 0 5 16:45 8 13 16:45 8 18 27 35 62
17:00 0 1 17:00 9 2 17:00 9 3 21 20 41
17:15 0 1 17:15 3 7 17:15 3 8
17:30 0 0 17:30 7 6 17:30 7 6
17:45 0 2 17:45 2 1 17:45 2 3
18:00 0 4 18:00 0 1 18:00 0 5
18:15 0 1 18:15 0 0 18:15 0 1
18:30 1 1 18:30 0 0 18:30 1 1
18:45 0 0 18:45 0 0 18:45 0 0
19:00 0 0 19:00 0 0 19:00 0 0
19:15 0 0 19:15 0 0 19:15 0 0
19:30 0 0 19:30 0 0 19:30 0 0
19:45 0 0 19:45 0 0 19:45 0 0
20:00 0 0 20:00 0 0 20:00 0 0
20:15 0 0 20:15 0 0 20:15 0 0
20:30 0 0 20:30 0 0 20:30 0 0
20:45 0 0 20:45 0 0 20:45 0 0
21:00 0 0 21:00 0 0 21:00 0 0
21:15 0 0 21:15 0 0 21:15 0 0
21:30 0 0 21:30 0 0 21:30 0 0
21:45 0 0 21:45 0 0 21:45 0 0
22:00 0 0 22:00 0 0 22:00 0 0
22:15 0 0 22:15 0 0 22:15 0 0
22:30 0 0 22:30 0 0 22:30 0 0
22:45 0 0 22:45 0 0 22:45 0 0
23:00 0 0 23:00 0 0 23:00 0 0
23:15 0 0 23:15 0 0 23:15 0 0
23:30 0 0 23:30 0 0 23:30 0 0
23:45 0 0 23:45 0 0 23:45 0 0
13 107 450 356 463 463
Daily 926
In Out Total In Out Total
35 29 64 48 51 99 926
North Driveway South Driveway

TOTAL OF

BOTH DRIVEWAYS
Daily
Peak Hour
Morning Evening
Apx - 98
Day: City: Rialto
Date: Project #: 14‐6015‐001

NB SB EB WB
174 472 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 0 0 6 16 22
00:15 0 0 07 13 20
00:30 0 0 04 15 19
00:45 0 0 0 7 24 12 56 19 80
01:00 0 0 02 8 10
01:15 0 0 01 12 13
01:30 0 0 03 9 12
01:45 0 0 0 3 9 8 37 11 46
02:00 0 0 0 6 12 18
02:15 0 0 0 4 10 14
02:30 0 0 0 4 10 14
02:45 0 0 0 7 21 11 43 18 64
03:00 0 0 0 4 12 16
03:15 0 0 0 5 9 14
03:30 0 0 0 6 12 18
03:45 0 0 0 5 20 8 41 13 61
04:00 0 0 0 3 18 21
04:15 0 0 0 3 13 16
04:30 0 0 0 6 23 29
04:45 0 0 0 2 14 13 67 15 81
05:00 0 0 0 0 14 14
05:15 0 0 0 6 11 17
05:30 0 0 0 2 7 9
05:45 0 0 0 4 12 12 44 16 56
06:00 0 0 0 5 6 11
06:15 0 0 0 1 9 10
06:30 0 0 0 4 6 10
06:45 0 0 0 0 10 3 24 3 34
07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:15 0 5 5 0 0 0
07:30 0 1 1 0 0 0
07:45 33 7 13 10 16 0 0 0
08:00 0 9 9 0 0 0
08:15 3 8 11 0 0 0
08:30 3 5 8 0 0 0
08:45 3 9 7 29 10 38 0 0 0
09:00 1 6 7 0 0 0
09:15 1 6 7 0 0 0
09:30 3 9 12 0 0 0
09:45 49 9 30 13 39 0 0 0
10:00 4 8 12 0 0 0
10:15 4 11 15 0 0 0
10:30 5 9 14 0 0 0
10:45 3 16 12 40 15 56 0 0 0
11:00 8 13 21 0 0 0
11:15 7 14 21 0 0 0
11:30 5 8 13 0 0 0
11:45 7 27 13 48 20 75 0 0 0
TOTALS 64 160 224 110 312 422
SPLIT % 28.6% 71.4% 34.7% 26.1% 73.9% 65.3%

CARS IN CARS OUT
174 472
AM Peak Hour 11:00 11:45 11:45 12:00 16:00 16:00
AM Pk Volume 27 57 81 24 67 81
Pk Hr Factor 0.844 0.891 0.920 0.857 0.728 0.698
7 ‐ 9 Volume 12 42 00 54 26 111 00 137
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:45 07:45 16:00 16:00 16:00
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 9 29 0 0 38 14 67 0 0 81
Pk Hr Factor 0.750 0.806 0.000 0.000 0.864 0.583 0.728 0.000 0.000 0.698 Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total
29 29 58 67 67 134 944
VOLUME
Prepared by NDS/ATD
13:15
13:30
13:45
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
14:15
14:30
1/16/2014
14:45
15:00

DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
Thursday
17:30
17:45
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
14:00
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
16:45
17:00
17:15
Project Dwy e/o N Cactus Ave
21:30
21:45
22:00
Total
646
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15

DAILY TOTALS
22:15
22:30
22:45
23:00
23:15
23:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total
646

DAILY TOTALS
21:00
21:15
20:30
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
20:45
18:00
18:15
Peak Hour
Daily
Morning Morning
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Apx - 99
GANDDINI GROUP INC.
714.795.3100 | ganddini.com
Tra!c Engineering # Transporta%on Planning # Parking # Noise & Vibra%on Air Quality # Global Climate Change # Health Risk Assessment

FLORENCE AVENUE CAR WASH

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS
City of Huntington Park
October 13, 2021
<UNHIDDEN>

FLORENCE AVENUE CAR WASH

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS
City of Huntington Park
October 13, 2021
prepared by
Roma Stromberg, INCE, MS
Catherine Howe, MS
GANDDINI GROUP INC.
555 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 225
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 795-3100 | ganddini.com Project No. 19278
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
i 19278

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description .......................................................................................................................................................... 1

2. NOISE AND VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS .................................................................................................. 4 Noise Fundamentals ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Vibration Fundamentals ................................................................................................................................................. 4

3. EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................... 8 Existing Land Uses and Sensitive Receptors ............................................................................................................ 8 Ambient Noise Measurements ..................................................................................................................................... 8

4. REGULATORY SETTING .................................................................................................................................... 12 Federal Regulation ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Federal Noise Control Act of 1972 ............................................................................................................. 12 State Regulations .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 State of California General Plan Guidelines 2017 ................................................................................... 12 California Environmental Quality Act .......................................................................................................... 13 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) ................................................................................ 14 Local Regulations .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 City of Huntington Park 2030 General Plan.............................................................................................. 14 City of Huntington Park Municipal Code ................................................................................................... 14

5. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY AND MODEL PARAMETERS................................................................ 22 Construction Noise Modeling ................................................................................................................................... 22 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model................................................... 22 SoundPLAN Noise Model ........................................................................................................................................... 22

6. IMPACT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................. 24 Impacts Related to Construction Noise .................................................................................................................. 24 Noise Impacts to Off-Site Receptors Due to Project Generated Trips .......................................................... 25 Noise impacts to Off-Site Receptors Due to On-Site Operational Noise ..................................................... 25 Groundborne Vibration Impacts ............................................................................................................................... 26 Annoyance to Persons ..................................................................................................................................... 27 Architectural Damage ...................................................................................................................................... 28

7. MEASURES TO REDUCE IMPACTS................................................................................................................. 35 Construction Noise Reduction Measures .............................................................................................................. 35 Operational Noise Reduction Measures ................................................................................................................. 35

8. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................................... 36

APPENDICES
Appendix A List of Acronyms
Appendix B Glossary
Appendix C Noise Measurement Field Worksheet
Appendix D Construction Noise Modeling
Appendix E Project Generated Trips FHWA Worksheets
Appendix F SoundPLAN Worksheets
Appendix G Vibration Worksheets
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
ii 19278

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Short-Term Noise Measurement Summary (dBA)....................................................................................... 9 Table 2. Long-Term Noise Measurement Summary (dBA) .................................................................................... 10 Table 3. Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure ....................................................................... 17 Table 4. Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ..................................................................... 18 Table 5. Guideline Vibration Annoyance Potential Criteria ................................................................................... 19 Table 6. City of Huntington Beach Stationary Noise Standards .......................................................................... 20 Table 7. Adjusted City of Huntington Beach Stationary Noise Standards ........................................................ 21 Table 8. CA/T Equipment Noise Emissions and Acoustical Usage Factor Database ...................................... 29 Table 9. Construction Noise Levels (Leq) ................................................................................................................... 31 Table 10. Construction Equipment Vibration Source Levels ................................................................................... 32

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Project Location Map .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3. Weighted Sound Levels and Human Response ........................................................................................... 6 Figure 4. Typical Levels of Groundborne Vibration ...................................................................................................... 7 Figure 5. Noise Measurement Location Map .............................................................................................................. 11 Figure 6. Peak Hour Operational Noise Levels ........................................................................................................... 33 Figure 7. Peak Hour Operational Noise Level Contours .......................................................................................... 34 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
ES-1 19278

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the noise impacts associated with development and operation of the proposed Florence Avenue Car Wash project and to identify mitigation measures that may be necessary to reduce those impacts. The noise issues related to the proposed land use and development have been evaluated in light of applicable federal, state and local policies, including those of the City of Huntington Park.

Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A list of acronyms and glossary are provided in Appendix A and Appendix B of this report to assist the reader with technical terms related to noise analysis.

PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed project is located at 3100 East Florence Avenue in the City of Huntington Park, California. The project site is currently developed with a medical office building.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves redevelopment of the site with a proposed automatic car wash. Vehicular access is proposed at Florence Avenue.

PROJECT IMPACTS
Construction Impacts
Modeled unmitigated construction noise levels when combined with existing measured noise levels reached up to 67.7 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the northwest, 80.1 dBA Leq at the nearest church/school property line to the northwest, 75.9 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the north, 69.1 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the northeast, 75.6 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the east, 84.7 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the south, and

80.9 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the west of the project site.

Construction noise sources are regulated within Section 9-3.506 of the City’s Municipal Code which prohibits construction activities between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM on weekdays, including Saturdays, or at any time on Sundays or Federal holidays.

The City of Huntington Park has not adopted a numerical threshold that identifies what a substantial increase would be. For purposes of this analysis, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2006) criteria will be used to establish significance thresholds. For residential uses, the daytime noise threshold is 80 dBA Leq averaged over an 8-hour period (Leq (8-hr); and the nighttime noise threshold is 70 dBA Leq (8-hr). For commercial uses, the daytime and nighttime noise threshold is 85 dBA Leq (8- hr). In compliance with the City’s Code, it is assumed that construction would not occur during the noisesensitive nighttime hours.

Therefore, unmitigated project construction would be anticipated to exceed the FTA thresholds at the residential uses located to the south of the project site and mitigation is required. With incorporation of mufflers and/or enclosures or acoustical tents (as appropriate) that provide at least 10 dB of noise reduction, modeled mitigated construction noise levels when combined with existing measured noise levels would not be anticipated to exceed the FTA residential thresholds. Further, with compliance with the City’s Code, it is assumed that construction would not occur during the noise-sensitive nighttime hours.

Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
ES-2 19278
Therefore, with adherence to applicable Municipal Ordinances and incorporation of mitigation measures identified in Section 7 of this report, construction noise impacts would be less than significant.

Noise Impacts to Off-Site Receptors Due to Project Generated Trips The largest peak hour traffic volume associated with the proposed project would occur during the late afternoon/early evening and would generate approximately 134 vehicle trips. Assuming that the vehicle mix associated with the proposed project is 97 percent automobiles, 2 percent medium trucks and 1 percent heavy trucks, and a speed of 35 miles per hour, noise levels associated with peak hour project generated vehicle traffic would reach up to 47 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet. The quietest measured hour in the project vicinity was 58.1 dBA Leq and occurred between 2:00 and 3:00 AM. The increase in ambient noise levels associated with project peak hour operation would not be readily noticeable over existing ambient noise levels. This impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.

Noise Impacts to Off-Site Receptors Due to On-Site Operational Noise The SoundPLAN noise model was utilized to estimate project peak hour operational noise at noise measurement locations and at adjacent properties in order to determine if it is likely to exceed the City’s noise thresholds at sensitive receptors. In summary, daytime (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM) operation of the proposed project would not violate City noise standards or result in substantial increases in measured ambient noise levels. Nighttime (10:00 PM and 7:00 AM) operation of the project would likely violate City noise standards at residential land uses located south of the project site and result in substantial increases in ambient noise levels. Implementation of a mitigation measure limiting project operational hours to 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM will reduce potential impacts to a level below significant.

Groundborne Vibration Impacts
Use of either a vibratory roller or a bulldozer would clearly be highly annoying to nearby sensitive receptors.

Annoyance is expected to be short-term, occurring only during site grading and preparation. Use of vibratory roller equipment within 19 feet of the eastern and western property lines and 16 feet of the southern property line and bulldozers within 12 feet of the eastern and western property lines and 7 feet of the southern property line where adjacent residential and commercial structures are located could result in architectural damage. Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to nearby structures have been provided. Therefore, with incorporation of mitigation, impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant.

Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
ES-3 19278

CONSTRUCTION NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES
In addition to adherence to the City of Huntington Park Municipal Code which limits the construction hours of operation, the following measures are recommended to reduce construction noise and vibrations, emanating from the proposed project:

1. During all project construction phases on-site, construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with either properly operating and maintained mufflers or enclosures/acoustical tents (as appropriate) that achieve at least 10 dB reduction from noise level specifications presented in this report.

2. The contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

3. Equipment shall be shut off and not left to idle when not in use.

4. The contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise/vibration sources and sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.

5. Jackhammers, pneumatic equipment and all other portable stationary noise sources shall be shielded and noise shall be directed away from sensitive receptors.

6. The project proponent shall mandate that the construction contractor prohibit the use of music or sound amplification on the project site during construction.

7. The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment.

8. Care should be used when using vibratory rollers and/or any other equivalent vibratory equipment within 19 feet of the eastern and western property lines and 16 feet of the southern property line and bulldozers within 12 feet of the eastern and western property lines and 7 feet of the southern property line where adjacent residential and commercial structures are located.

OPERATIONAL NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES

1. Operation of the proposed car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM.

Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
1 19278

1. INTRODUCTION
This section describes the purpose of this noise impact analysis, project location, proposed development, and study area. Figure 1 shows the project location map and Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the noise impacts resulting from development of the proposed Florence Avenue Car Wash project and to identify mitigation measures that may be necessary to reduce those impacts. The noise issues related to the proposed land use and development have been evaluated in light of applicable federal, state and local policies, including those of the City of Huntington Park.

Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A list of acronyms and glossary are provided in Appendix A and Appendix B of this report to assist the reader with technical terms related to noise analysis.

PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed project is located at 3100 East Florence Avenue in the City of Huntington Park, California. The project site is currently developed with a medical office building. A vicinity map showing the project location is provided on Figure 1.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves redevelopment of the site with a proposed automatic car wash. Vehicular access is proposed at Florence Avenue. Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. 1 Figure 1
Project Location Map
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
19278
N
Site
M
S
I
S
I
O
N
P
L

FLORENCE AVE
M
O
U
N
T
A
N
I
V
I
E
W
AV
E

STATE ST
2 Figure 2
Site Plan
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
19278
N
3 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
4 19278

2. NOISE AND VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS

NOISE FUNDAMENTALS
Sound is a pressure wave created by a moving or vibrating source that travels through an elastic medium such as air. Noise is defined as unwanted or objectionable sound. The effects of noise on people can include general annoyance, interference with speech communication, sleep disturbance, and in extreme circumstances, hearing impairment.

Commonly used noise terms are presented in Appendix B. The unit of measurement used to describe a noise level is the decibel (dB). The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies within the sound spectrum.

Therefore, the “A-weighted” noise scale, which weights the frequencies to which humans are sensitive, is used for measurements. Noise levels using A-weighted measurements are written dB(A) or dBA.

From the noise source to the receiver, noise changes both in level and frequency spectrum. The most obvious is the decrease in noise as the distance from the source increases. The manner in which noise reduces with distance depends on whether the source is a point or line source as well as ground absorption, atmospheric effects and refraction, and shielding by natural and manmade features. Sound from point sources, such as air conditioning condensers, radiates uniformly outward as it travels away from the source in a spherical pattern.

The noise drop-off rate associated with this geometric spreading is 6 dBA per each doubling of the distance (dBA/DD). Transportation noise sources such as roadways are typically analyzed as line sources, since at any given moment the receiver may be impacted by noise from multiple vehicles at various locations along the roadway. Because of the geometry of a line source, the noise drop-off rate associated with the geometric spreading of a line source is 3 dBA/DD.

Decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale, which quantifies sound intensity in a manner similar to the Richter scale used for earthquake magnitudes. Thus, a doubling of the energy of a noise source, such as a doubled traffic volume, would increase the noise levels by 3 dBA; halving of the energy would result in a 3 dBA decrease. Figure 3 shows the relationship of various noise levels to commonly experienced noise events.

Average noise levels over a period of minutes or hours are usually expressed as dBA Leq, or the equivalent noise level for that period of time. For example, Leq(3-hr) would represent a 3-hour average. When no period is specified, a one-hour average is assumed.

Noise standards for land use compatibility are stated in terms of the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) and the Day-Night Average Noise Level (DNL). CNEL is a 24-hour weighted average measure of community noise. CNEL is obtained by adding five decibels to sound levels in the evening (7:00 PM to 10:00 PM), and by adding ten decibels to sound levels at night (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). This weighting accounts for the increased human sensitivity to noise during the evening and nighttime hours. DNL is a very similar 24- hour average measure that weights only the nighttime hours.

It is widely accepted that the average healthy ear can barely perceive changes of 3 dBA; that a change of 5 dBA is readily perceptible, and that an increase (decrease) of 10 dBA sounds twice (half) as loud. This definition is recommended by the California Department of Transportation’s Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (2013).

VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS
The way in which vibration is transmitted through the earth is called propagation. Propagation of earthborn vibrations is complicated and difficult to predict because of the endless variations in the soil through which waves travel. There are three main types of vibration propagation: surface, compression and shear waves.

Surface waves, or Raleigh waves, travel along the ground’s surface. These waves carry most of their energy along an expanding circular wave front, similar to ripples produced by throwing a rock into a pool of water. 4 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
5 19278
Compression waves, or P-waves, are body waves that carry their energy along an expanding spherical wave front. The particle motion in these waves is longitudinal (i.e., in a “push-pull” fashion). P-waves are analogous to airborne sound waves. Shear waves, or S-waves, are also body waves that carry energy along an expanding spherical wave front. However, unlike P-waves, the particle motion is transverse or “side-to-side and perpendicular to the direction of propagation”.

As vibration waves propagate from a source, the energy is spread over an ever-increasing area such that the energy level striking a given point is reduced with the distance from the energy source. This geometric spreading loss is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Wave energy is also reduced with distance as a result of material damping in the form of internal friction, soil layering, and void spaces. The amount of attenuation provided by material damping varies with soil type and condition as well as the frequency of the wave.

Vibration amplitudes are usually expressed as either peak particle velocity (PPV) or the root mean square (RMS) velocity. The PPV is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal in inches per second. The RMS of a signal is the average of the squared amplitude of the signal in vibration decibels (VdB), ref one micro-inch per second. The Federal Railroad Administration uses the abbreviation “VdB” for vibration decibels to reduce the potential for confusion with sound decibel.

PPV is appropriate for evaluating the potential of building damage and VdB is commonly used to evaluate human response. Decibel notation acts to compress the range of numbers required in measuring vibration.

Similar to the noise descriptors, Leq and Lmax can be used to describe the average vibration and the maximum vibration level observed during a single vibration measurement interval. Figure 4 illustrates common vibration sources and the human and structural responses to ground-borne vibration. As shown in the figure, the threshold of perception for human response is approximately 65 VdB; however, human response to vibration is not usually substantial unless the vibration exceeds 70 VdB. Vibration tolerance limits for sensitive instruments such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or electron microscopes could be much lower than the human vibration perception threshold.
5 Figure 3
Weighted Sound Levels and Human Response
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
19278
Source: Bruel & Kjaer 2001
6 Figure 4
Typical Levels of Groundborne Vibration
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
19278
Source: FRA, 2012. Federal Railroad Administration High-Speed Ground Transportation Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Office of Railroad Policy Development, Washington, D.C. DOT/FRA/ORD-12/15. September. 7 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
8 19278

3. EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT

EXISTING LAND USES AND SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
The project site is bordered by Florence Avenue to the north, commercial uses to the east and west, and residential uses to the south.

The State of California defines sensitive receptors as those land uses that require serenity or are otherwise adversely affected by noise events or conditions. Schools, libraries, churches, hospitals, single and multiplefamily residential, including transient lodging, motels and hotel uses make up the majority of these areas.

Furthermore, the City of Huntington Park 2030 General Plan considers hospitals and convalescent homes, churches, libraries, schools, and child care facilities to be noise sensitive uses and more specifically identifies the City’s schools, Huntington Park Convalescent Hospital, the library, parks, and residential areas as the noise sensitive uses within the City.

Sensitive land uses that may be affected by project noise include the existing single-family detached residential dwelling units located adjacent to the south of the project site and approximately 235 feet northeast of the project site. In addition, St Mathias Catholic Church and St Mathias School are located as close as approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site.

AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS
An American National Standards Institute (ANSI Section SI4 2013 Class 1) Larson Davis model LxT sound level meter was used to document existing ambient noise levels. In order to document existing ambient noise levels in the project area, five (5) 15-minute daytime noise measurements were taken between 2:16 PM and 4:38 PM on August 3, 2020. In addition, one (1) long-term 24-hour noise measurement was also taken from August 3, 2020 to August 4, 2020. Field worksheets and noise measurement output data are included in Appendix C.

As shown on Figure 5, the noise measurements were taken at the south of the project site near the singlefamily residential uses located adjacent to the south of the project site (STNM1), near the residential dwelling units to the northeast of the project site (along Benson Street) (STNM2), near the church use to the north of the project site (along Florence Avenue) (STNM3), near the single-family residential dwelling units located to the northeast of the project site (along Cedar Street) (STNM4), near the single-family residential uses located adjacent to the south of the project site (along Walnut Street), and at the south of the project site near the single-family residential uses located adjacent to the south of the project site (LTNM1). Table 1 provides a summary of the short-term ambient noise data. Table 2 provides hourly interval ambient noise data from the long-term noise measurement. Short-term ambient noise levels were measured between 58.5 and 76.9 dBA Leq. Long-term hourly noise measurement ambient noise levels ranged from 51.8 to 61.8 dBA Leq. The dominant noise sources were from vehicles traveling along Florence Avenue, Benson Street, Cedar Street, Walnut Street, and other surrounding roadways as well as ambulance sirens. 8 Site Location Time Started Leq Lmax Lmin L(2) L(8) L(25) L(50) STNM1 2:16 PM 60.6 74.3 48.5 67.0 64.2 61.5 59.0
STNM2 2:47 PM 62.1 82.2 50.5 68.5 64.6 61.6 58.7
STNM3 3:15 PM 76.9 101.1 56.5 79.7 76.9 74.6 71.3
STNM4 3:39 PM 61.0 75.8 51.2 69.4 65.4 60.1 57.2
STNM5 4:23 PM 58.5 73.2 43.8 66.9 63.8 58.1 52.5
(1) See Figure 5 for noise measurement locations. Each noise measurement was performed over a 15-minute duration. (2) Noise measurements performed on August 3, 2020.

Notes:

Table 1
Short-Term Noise Measurement Summary (dBA)
Daytime Measurements1,2
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
9 19278
Leq Lmax Lmin L(2) L(8) L(25) L(50)
7:00 PM 59.0 89.4 37.6 64.8 62.0 59.2 56.0
7:00 PM 59.2 71.7 44.5 64.9 62.7 60.5 58.2
8:00 PM 61.8 85.7 46.9 68.3 63.2 60.8 58.5
9:00 PM 61.8 89.4 44.7 66.6 62.9 60.1 57.2
10:00 PM 60.3 84.8 43.6 65.9 62.4 59.2 55.9
11:00 PM 57.1 73.4 41.6 63.7 60.9 57.9 53.7
12:00 AM 54.7 69.2 40.6 62.2 59.6 55.8 50.7
1:00 AM 53.6 74.4 38.8 60.7 57.8 53.5 49.6
2:00 AM 51.8 69.8 37.9 59.7 56.8 51.6 47.2
3:00 AM 52.9 65.8 37.9 61.3 58.0 53.4 47.2
4:00 AM 55.2 67.4 37.6 62.4 60.2 56.5 50.9
5:00 AM 57.7 69.7 39.9 64.3 62.1 59.1 55.1
6:00 AM 58.5 70.5 39.7 64.4 62.9 60.2 56.3
7:00 AM 59.5 77.1 41.8 65.4 63.3 60.8 57.7
8:00 AM 59.5 71.2 40.4 64.6 62.9 60.9 58.6
9:00 AM 58.4 73.9 42.8 64.0 61.9 59.8 57.3
10:00 AM 60.3 82.5 43.9 64.9 62.2 59.8 57.3
11:00 AM 59.1 81.6 43.6 65.0 61.6 59.2 56.9
12:00 PM 61.2 85.2 42.6 67.5 62.6 58.9 56.7
1:00 PM 57.4 73.0 41.6 63.6 60.9 58.3 55.9
2:00 PM 60.0 82.7 43.6 66.0 61.5 58.9 56.8
3:00 PM 61.1 85.6 44.4 64.9 61.4 59.4 57.3
4:00 PM 59.8 80.6 44.6 66.1 62.5 59.7 57.4
5:00 PM 59.4 78.6 46.2 64.8 61.8 59.4 57.6
6:00 PM 59.6 74.6 45.5 65.7 62.6 60.4 58.2
(1)
(2)
6 Table 2
Long-Term Noise Measurement Summary (dBA)
24-Hour Ambient Noise1,2
Hourly
Measurements Time Started
Overall Summary
1 2
3 4
5 18
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 Notes:

See Figure 5 for noise measurement locations. Noise measurement was performed over a 24-hour duration.

Noise measurement performed from August 3, 2020 to August 4, 2020. 19 20
21 22
23 24
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
10 19278
Figure 5
Noise Measurement Location Map
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
19278
N
Site
M
S
I
S
O
I
N
P
L

FLORENCE AVE
B
E
N
S
O
N
S
T
P
L
A
S
KA
AV
E
C
E
D
A
R
S
T

WALNUT ST
Noise Measurement Location
Legend
NM 1
ST NM Short-Term Noise Measurement
LT NM Long-Term Noise Measurement
## Leq Noise Level
ST NM 1

60.6 ST NM 5

58.5 LT NM 1

51.8-61.8
ST NM 4

61.0 ST NM 3

76.9 ST NM 2

62.1 11
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
12 19278

4. REGULATORY SETTING

FEDERAL REGULATION
Federal Noise Control Act of 1972
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Noise Abatement and Control was originally established to coordinate federal noise control activities. After its inception, EPA’s Office of Noise Abatement and Control issued the Federal Noise Control Act of 1972, establishing programs and guidelines to identify and address the effects of noise on public health, welfare, and the environment. In response, the EPA published Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety (Levels of Environmental Noise). The Levels of Environmental Noise recommended that the Ldn should not exceed 55 dBA outdoors or 45 dBA indoors to prevent significant activity interference and annoyance in noise-sensitive areas.

In addition, the Levels of Environmental Noise identified five (5) dBA as an “adequate margin of safety” for a noise level increase relative to a baseline noise exposure level of 55 dBA Ldn (i.e., there would not be a noticeable increase in adverse community reaction with an increase of five dBA or less from this baseline level). The EPA did not promote these findings as universal standards or regulatory goals with mandatory applicability to all communities, but rather as advisory exposure levels below which there would be no risk to a community from any health or welfare effect of noise.

In 1981, EPA administrators determined that subjective issues such as noise would be better addressed at lower levels of government. Consequently, in 1982 responsibilities for regulating noise control policies were transferred to State and local governments. However, noise control guidelines and regulations contained in EPA rulings in prior years remain in place by designated Federal agencies, allowing more individualized control for specific issues by designated Federal, State, and local government agencies.

STATE REGULATIONS
State of California General Plan Guidelines 2017
Though not adopted by law, the State of California General Plan Guidelines 2017, published by the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) (OPR Guidelines), provides guidance for the compatibility of projects within areas of specific noise exposure. The OPR Guidelines identify the suitability of various types of construction relative to a range of outdoor noise levels and provide each local community some flexibility in setting local noise standards that allow for the variability in community preferences. Findings presented in the Levels of Environmental Noise Document (EPA 1974) influenced the recommendations of the OPR Guidelines, most importantly in the choice of noise exposure metrics (i.e., Ldn or CNEL) and in the upper limits for the normally acceptable outdoor exposure of noise-sensitive uses.

The OPR Guidelines include a Noise and Land Use Compatibility Matrix which identifies acceptable and unacceptable community noise exposure limits for various land use categories. Where the “normally acceptable” range is used, it is defined as the highest noise level that should be considered for the construction of the buildings which do not incorporate any special acoustical treatment or noise mitigation. The “conditionally acceptable” or “normally unacceptable” ranges include conditions calling for detailed acoustical study prior to the construction or operation of the proposed project. The City of Huntington Park has not adopted specific land use compatibility guidelines; therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, the State Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for land use planning has been used to assess potential transportation noise impacts to proposed land uses (see Table 3).
12 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
13 19278
California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (Appendix G) establishes thresholds for noise impact analysis. This noise study includes analysis of noise and vibration impacts necessary to assess the project in light of the following Appendix G Checklist Thresholds.

Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Substantial increases in ambient noise levels are usually associated with project construction noise (temporary) and project operational noise (permanent).

Project Construction Noise: Construction noise sources are regulated within the City of Huntington Park under Section 9-3.506 of the City’s Municipal Code which prohibits construction activities between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM on weekdays, including Saturdays, or at any time on Sundays or Federal holidays.

Although construction activity may be exempt from the noise standards in the City’s Code, CEQA requires that potential noise impacts still be evaluated for significance.

The City of Huntington Park has not adopted a numerical threshold that identifies what a substantial increase would be. For purposes of this analysis, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2018) criteria will be used to establish significance thresholds. The FTA provides reasonable criteria for assessing construction noise impacts based on the potential for adverse community reaction. For residential uses, the daytime noise threshold is 80 dBA Leq averaged over an 8-hour period (Leq (8-hr); and the nighttime noise threshold is 70 dBA Leq (8-hr). For commercial uses, the daytime and nighttime noise threshold is 85 dBA Leq (8-hr). In compliance with the City’s Code, it is assumed that construction would not occur during the noise-sensitive nighttime hours.

Project Operational Noise (permanent): The proposed project has the potential to generate on-site and offsite noise. For on-site generated noise, the City of Huntington Park has not identified noise level standards.

For the purposes of this analysis, for stationary noise sources, an increase of 5 dB or greater than the ambient noise level will be considered to be substantial.

For off-site project generated noise, increases in ambient noise along affected roadways due to project generated vehicle traffic is considered substantial if they result in an increase of at least 5 dBA CNEL and: (1) the existing noise levels already exceed the applicable land use compatibility standard for the affected sensitive receptors set forth in the State Land Use Compatibility Guidelines; or (2) the project increases noise levels by at least 5 dBA CNEL and raises the ambient noise level from below the applicable standard to above the applicable standard.
b) Generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? As shown in Table 4, the threshold at which there is a risk to “architectural” damage to historic and some older buildings is a peak particle velocity (PPV) of 0.3, at older residential structures a PPV of 0.3, and at new residential structures a PPV of 0.5. Table 5 shows that a PPV of 0.04 is the threshold at which groundborne vibration becomes distinctly perceptible in regards to annoyance. Impacts would be significant if construction activities result in groundborne vibration of 0.25 PPV or higher at a sensitive receptor. 13 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
14 19278
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
The California Department of Transportation has published one of the seminal works for the analysis of ground-borne noise and vibration relating to transportation- and construction-induced vibrations and although the project is not subject to these regulations, it serves as useful tools to evaluate vibration impacts. These guidelines recommend that a standard of 0.25 inches per second (in/sec) PPV not be exceeded for the protection of historic and some old buildings (California Department of Transportation, 2020).

LOCAL REGULATIONS
City of Huntington Park 2030 General Plan
The City of Huntington Park 2030 General Plan Health and Safety Element includes the following policies in regards to noise which apply to the proposed project.

Issue: Noise & Land Use
Policy 25: The City of Huntington Park shall ensure acceptable noise levels near schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, and other noise-sensitive areas.

Policy 27: The City of Huntington Park shall require noise-reduction techniques in site planning, architectural design, and construction where noise reduction is necessary.

Issue: Non-Transportation Control Measures
Policy 30: The City of Huntington Park shall reduce noise generated by building activities by requiring sound attenuation devices on construction equipment.

City of Huntington Park Municipal Code
Article 5 Noise Standards of the City’s Municipal Code establishes noise standards in order to protect the health, safety, welfare and living/working environments of those living and working in the City. The City’s Ordinance also refers to the noise compatibility criteria found in the City’s General Plan Noise Element regarding the compatibility of specific categories of land uses and noise levels within the community. The purpose of the noise compatibility criteria is to identify potential conflicts between new development projects and the existing noise environment. The Noise Element should be consulted during the project formulation stage in order to determine the compatibility between the proposed land use, the proposed site and the surrounding neighborhood.

Section 9-3.504 Excessive noise prohibited.

It shall be unlawful for any person to willfully make or continue, or willfully cause to be made or continue, any loud, unnecessary or unusual noise that disturbs the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or constitutes a public nuisance.
9-3.505 Noise determination standards.

The standards which may be considered in determining whether a violation of the provisions of this Article exists shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

1. The loudness of the noise;

2. The purpose for which the noise is produced;

3. Whether the nature of the noise is usual/natural or unusual/unnatural;

4. The proximity of the noise to residential sleeping facilities;

5. The time of the day or night the noise occurs;

6. The duration of the noise and whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent or continuous; and 14 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
15 19278

7. Whether the noise is produced by a residential or nonresidential activity.

Section 9-3.506 Exceptions to provisions.

Exemptions that apply to the proposed project are listed below.

1. Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling or grading of any real property, provided the activities do not take place between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM on weekdays, including Saturdays, or at any time on Sundays or Federal holidays;

2. Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property, provided the activities do not take place between 8:00 PM and 7:00 AM on weekdays, including Saturdays, or earlier than 9:00 AM on Sundays and Federal holidays; and

3. Vehicle Repairs and Testing. No person shall cause or permit the repairing, rebuilding, modifying or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle or motorboat in a manner as to cause a noise disturbance between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. within or adjacent to any residential area.

4. Parking and Landscape Areas. Parking and landscape area activities (i.e., mechanical sweeping, mechanical grass cutting and mechanical blowing) shall not impact residential uses. No parking area or landscape maintenance shall occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area.

Section 9-3.507 Specific requirements.

Specific requirements that will apply to operation of the proposed project are listed below.

1. Radios, Television Sets and Similar Devices. Any noise level from the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, television set or other machine or device for the producing or reproducing of sound between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., which exceeds the noise limit of sixty-five (65) dBA established by the General Plan at the property line shall be a violation of this chapter.

2. Loading and Unloading. No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans or similar objects between the hours of 8:00 PM and 7:00 AM in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area.

3. Vehicle Repairs and Testing. No person shall cause or permit the repairing, rebuilding, modifying or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle or motorboat in a manner as to cause a noise disturbance between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. within or adjacent to any residential area.

4. Parking and Landscape Areas. Parking and landscape area activities (i.e., mechanical sweeping, mechanical grass cutting and mechanical blowing) shall not impact residential uses. No parking area or landscape maintenance shall occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area.

Section 9-4.203 Zoning District Development Standards.

Noise from one land use crossing the property line of an adjacent property, are regulated by Section 9-4.203 Zoning District Development Standards of the Municipal Code. The applicable standards depend on the type of land use and the duration of sound event during any particular hour. These standards are presented in 15 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
16 19278
Table 6. Per Municipal Code Section 9-4.203, if the ambient sound levels within the nearby occupiable areas exceed the applicable standards for the cumulative period specified, the applicable standards for that period shall be the ambient sound level. In summary, the measured ambient sound level shall be the applicable standard. The adjusted thresholds per measured ambient noise levels are presented in Table 7. 16 Source: California Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines , 2017 Update.

Residential-Low Density Single Family,
Duplexes and Mobile Homes
Industrial, Manufacturing,
Utilities, Agriculture
Table 3
Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure
55 60
Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters
Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals,
Nursing Homes
Transient Lodging: Motels, Hotels
Residential Multi-Family Dwellings
Office Buildings, Businesses,
Commercial and Professional
Land Use
dBA, CNEL or Ldn
65 70 75 80
Golf Courses, Riding Stables,
Water Recreation, Cemeteries
Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks
Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports
Normally Unacceptable: New construction and development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made with needed noise insulation features included in the design. Outdoor areas must be shielded.

Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Construction costs to make the indoor environment acceptable would be prohibitive and the outdoor environment would not be usable.

Normally Acceptable: Specified land uses is satisfactory based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation or requirements.

Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Outdoor environment will seem noisy.

Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
17 19278
Transient Sources Continuous/Frequent Intermittent Sources Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, anceint monuments 0.12 0.08 Fragile buildings 0.2 0.1
Historic and some old buildings 0.5 0.25
Older residential structures 0.5 0.3
New residential structures 1.0 0.5
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.0 0.5
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Source: California Department of Transportation. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, Chapter 7 Table 19, April 2020.
(1) Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.

Table 4
Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria Notes:

Structure Condition
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
18 19278
Transient Sources Continuous/Frequent Intermittent Sources Barely perceptible 0.04 0.01
Distinctly perceptible 0.25 0.04
Strongly perceptible 0.9 0.10
Severe 2.0 0.4
Notes:

Source: California Department of Transportation. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, Chapter 7 Table 20, April 2020.

Table 5
Guideline Vibration Annoyance Potential Criteria
(1) Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.

Human Response
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
19 19278
Nature or Character of Intrusive Noise Commercial Areas, dB(A) Residential Areas, dB(A) Cumulative period of 30 minutes in any hour 45 40
Cumulative period of 15 minutes in any hour 50 50
Cumulative period of 5 minutes in any hour 55 50
Cumulative period of 1 minute in any hour 60 55
Anytime 65 60
Source: City of Huntington Park Municipal Ordinance 9-4.203.

Note: If the ambient sound level within the adjacent area exceeds the applicable standards for the cumulative period specified in subsection (2) of this subsection, the applicable standards for that period shall be the ambient sound level.

Table 6
City of Huntington Beach Stationary Noise Standards
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
20 19278
Measured Noise
Levels R1
Measured Noise
Levels R2
Measured Noise
Levels R3
Measured Noise
Levels R4
Measured Noise
Levels R5
Cumulative period of 30 minutes in any hour 59.0 58.7 71.3 57.2 52.5 Cumulative period of 15 minutes in any hour 61.5 61.6 74.6 60.1 58.1 Cumulative period of 5 minutes in any hour 64.2 64.6 76.9 65.4 63.8 Cumulative period of 1 minute in any hour 67.0 68.5 79.7 69.4 66.9 Anytime 74.3 82.2 101.1 75.8 73.2
Cumulative period of 30 minutes in any hour
Cumulative period of 15 minutes in any hour
Cumulative period of 5 minutes in any hour
Cumulative period of 1 minute in any hour
Anytime
Notes:
(1) See Table 2.

59.7 67.4
Nature or Character of Intrusive Noise
Nature or Character of Intrusive Noise
Most Quiet Nighttime Measurement1

51.8 51.6

56.8 Table 7
Adjusted City of Huntington Beach Stationary Noise Standards Commercial and Residential Areas, dB(A)
Daytime
Commercial and Residential Areas, dB(A)
21 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
22 19278

5. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY AND MODEL PARAMETERS
This section discusses the analysis methodologies used to assess noise impacts.

CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODELING
Construction noise associated with the proposed project was calculated at the sensitive receptor locations, utilizing methodology presented in the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (2018) together with several key construction parameters including: distance to each sensitive receiver, equipment usage, percent usage factor, and baseline parameters for the project site.

Distances to receptors were based on the acoustical center of the project site. The equipment list used to calculate the construction noise levels for each phase were based on assumptions provided in draft CalEEMod modeling data prepared for the project. For construction noise purposes, the distance measured from the project site to sensitive receptors was assumed to be the acoustical center of the project site to the property line of residential properties with existing residential buildings. Construction noise worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Existing and Existing Plus project traffic noise levels were modeled for roadways affected by project generated traffic utilizing the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108 in order to quantify the proposed project’s contribution to increases in ambient noise levels.

The FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model arrives at a predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). Adjustments are then made to the REMEL to account for: total average daily traffic volumes, roadway classification, width, speed and truck mix, roadway grade and site conditions (hard or soft ground surface). Surfaces adjacent to all modeled roadways were assumed to have a “hard site” to predict worst-case, conservative noise levels. A hard site, such as pavement, is highly reflective and does not attenuate noise as quickly as grass or other soft sites. Possible reductions in noise levels due to intervening topography and buildings were not accounted for in this analysis.

Existing and Existing Plus Project vehicle mix were obtained from the project's traffic study (Ganddini Group 2020). Existing Plus Project vehicle mixes were calculated by adding the proposed project trips to existing conditions. FHWA spreadsheets are included in Appendix E.

SOUNDPLAN NOISE MODEL
The SoundPLAN acoustical modeling software was utilized to model project operational worst-case stationary noise impacts from the proposed project to adjacent sensitive uses (e.g., residences). SoundPLAN is capable of evaluating stationary noise sources (e.g., parking lots, drive-thru menus, car wash equipment, vacuums, etc.) as well as mobile noise sources (e.g. vehicle traffic and train noise). The SoundPLAN software utilizes algorithms (based on the inverse square law) to calculate noise level projections. The software allows the user to input specific noise sources, spectral content, sound barriers, building placement, topography, and sensitive receptor locations. In addition to the information provided below, noise modeling input and output assumptions are provided in Appendix F.

Peak hour operational noise levels were modeled utilizing representative sound levels in the SoundPLAN model. Modeled noise sources include car wash drying equipment, vacuum equipment, and HVAC equipment.

All noise sources were modeled to be in full operation for an entire hour. This is a conservative modeling effort, given that in actuality, the noise sources are not in operation continuously for an entire hour. 22 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
23 19278
Car Wash Drying Equipment Noise

The car wash drying system is by far the loudest noise source associated with the car wash tunnel. Sound specifications for an Aerodry drying system were utilized to model car wash tunnel noise. Specifically, a representative sound level of 75 dBA Leq
1 at a distance of 20 feet, or a sound power level of 98.7 dBA Leq. A point noise source was placed inside the car wash tunnel, 5 feet from the exit at a height of 8 feet to represent dryer noise. Sound specifications are provided in Appendix F.

Vacuum Equipment Noise

The project proposes installation and use two vacuum producers to be located within cinder block buildings with hoses extending to individual vacuum stations. Two Vacutech producers (FT-DD-T340HP4) will be enclosed in each cinder block building located near each end of the car wash. Representative sound level data show that each producer is expected to generate a sound level of 43 dBA at a distance of 3 feet of the concrete building that they will be enclosed within. Both producers working simultaneously are expected to generate a noise level of 46 dBA at a distance of 3 feet from each enclosure. The noise associated with the vacuum producers will not be noticeable over the existing noise environment or over the car wash drying system. For this reason, they are not included in the SoundPLAN modeling effort.

A distribution of hoses will extend to vacuum stations where a sound level of approximately 76.7 dBA will be emitted from each hose end (as measured at a distance of 3-feet) when in use based on representative sound level measurements2. A sound power level of 84.7 was utilized to mode sound associated with each of the proposed vacuum/blower hose ends proposed throughout the site.

Mechanical Equipment (HVAC Units) Noise
A noise reference level of 67.7 dBA at 3 feet (sound power level of 86.7 dB) was utilized to represent rooftop 5 Ton Carrier HVAC units3. A rooftop HVAC plan is not available at the time of this analysis so the exact location and number of units per building were estimated. A total of 2 rooftop units were modeled on the proposed rooftops. The noise source height for each HVAC unit was assumed at 1 meter above the roof top.

Roof top is assumed to be approximately 6 meters (~18.3 feet) above grade. 1 Representative Noise Measurements provided by D.L. Adams Associates, August 11, 2016. 2 Noise Measurements taken at Fast Five Car Wash Murrieta. Kunzman Associates. November 7, 2017. 3 MD Acoustics, LLC Noise Measurement Data for RTU –Carrier 50TFQ0006 and car alarm. 23 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
24 19278

6. IMPACT ANALYSIS
This impact discussion analyzes the potential for noise and/or groundborne vibration impacts to cause the exposure of a person to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of established City of Huntington Park standards related to: construction, operation, and transportation noise related impacts to, or from, the proposed project.

IMPACTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION NOISE
The existing residential uses located to the south and northeast as well as the church/school uses to the north of the project site may be affected by short-term noise impacts associated with construction noise.

Construction noise will vary depending on the construction process, type of equipment involved, location of the construction site with respect to sensitive receptors, the schedule proposed to carry out each task (e.g., hours and days of the week) and the duration of the construction work.

The construction phases for the proposed project are anticipated to include grading, building construction, paving and architectural coating. A summary of noise level data for a variety of construction equipment compiled by the U.S. Department of Transportation is presented in Table 8. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings.

Construction noise associated with the proposed project was calculated utilizing methodology presented in the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (2018) together with several key construction parameters including: distance to each sensitive receiver, equipment usage, percent usage factor, and baseline parameters for the project site. Distances to receptors were based on the acoustical center of the proposed construction activity. Construction noise levels were calculated for each phase. Anticipated noise levels during each construction phase are presented in Table 9. Worksheets for each phase are included as Appendix D.

A comparison of existing noise levels and existing plus project construction noise levels is also presented in Table 9. STNM4 was chosen to represent noise levels at the property lines of the single-family residential uses to the northwest of the project site, STNM3 was chosen to represent noise levels at the property line of the church and school use to the northwest of the project site, STNM2 was chosen to represent noise levels at the property line of the commercial use to the north of the project site, STNM2 was chosen to represent noise levels at the property lines of the single-family residential uses to the northeast of the project site, STNM1 was chosen to represent noise levels at the property lines of the commercial uses to the east and west of the project site, and STNM1 was chosen to represent noise levels at the property lines of the singlefamily residential uses to the south of the project site.

Modeled unmitigated construction noise levels when combined with existing measured noise levels reached up to 67.7 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the northwest, 80.1 dBA Leq at the nearest church/school property line to the northwest, 75.9 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the north, 69.1 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the northeast, 75.6 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the east, 84.7 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the south, and

80.9 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the west of the project site.

As discussed earlier, construction noise sources are regulated within Section 9-3.506 of the City of Huntington Park Municipal Code which prohibits construction activities between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM on weekdays, including Saturdays, or at any time on Sundays or Federal holidays. 24 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
25 19278
As stated previously, per FTA daytime construction noise levels should not exceed 80 dBA Leq for an 8-hour period at residential uses and 85 dBA Leq for an 8-hour period at commercial uses. Therefore, unmitigated project construction would be anticipated to exceed the FTA thresholds at the residential uses located to the south of the project site. Therefore, mitigation is required.

As shown in Table 9, with incorporation of mufflers and/or enclosures or acoustical tents (as appropriate) that provide at least 10 dB of noise reduction, modeled mitigated construction noise levels when combined with existing measured noise levels reach up to 62.3 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the northwest, 77.3 dBA Leq at the nearest church/school property line to the northwest, 67.3 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the north, 63.6 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the northeast, 66.7 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the east, 74.9 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property line to the south, and 71.3 dBA Leq at the nearest commercial property line to the west of the project site.

Therefore, mitigated project construction noise levels would not be anticipated to exceed the FTA residential thresholds. Further, with compliance with the City’s Code, it is assumed that construction would not occur during the noise-sensitive nighttime hours.

Therefore, with adherence to the above Municipal Ordinances and incorporation of mitigation measures identified in Section 7 of this report, construction noise impacts would be less than significant.

NOISE IMPACTS TO OFF-SITE RECEPTORS DUE TO PROJECT GENERATED TRIPS The largest peak hour traffic volume associated with the proposed project would occur during the late afternoon/early evening and would generate approximately 134 vehicle trips. Assuming that the vehicle mix associated with the proposed project is 97 percent automobiles, 2 percent medium trucks and 1 percent heavy trucks, and a speed of 35 miles per hour, noise levels associated with peak hour project generated vehicle traffic would reach up to 47 dBA Leq at a distance of 50 feet. The quietest measured hour in the project vicinity was 58.1 dBA Leq and occurred between 2:00 and 3:00 AM. The increase in ambient noise levels associated with project peak hour operation would not be readily noticeable over existing ambient noise levels. This impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.

NOISE IMPACTS TO OFF-SITE RECEPTORS DUE TO ON-SITE OPERATIONAL NOISE As discussed previously, sensitive land uses that may be affected by project noise include the existing singlefamily detached residential dwelling units located adjacent to the south of the project site, approximately 235 feet northeast of the project site and the church uses located approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site. The City has established noise standards that apply to commercial land uses as well, so the adjacent land uses are also discussed below. For the purposes of this study, the residential noise standards were applied to the church located north of the project site and Florence Avenue.

The SoundPLAN noise model was utilized to estimate project peak hour operational noise at affected receptors in order to determine if it is likely to exceed the City’s noise standards at nearby “occupiable areas” per Municipal Code Section 9-4.203 (See Table 6). Per Municipal Code if the ambient sound levels within the nearby occupiable areas exceed the applicable standards for the cumulative period specified in Table 6, the applicable standards for that period shall be the ambient sound level. In summary, the measured ambient sound level shall be the applicable standard. The adjusted thresholds per measured ambient noise levels are presented in Table 7.

Adjacent Commercial Properties
The adjacent commercial building east of the proposed project is occupied by commercial businesses and medical offices. Operational noise levels outside of this building at the project’s eastern property line are expected to reach up to 65 dBA Leq (see Figure 6). Representative measured daytime sound levels for this 25 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
26 19278
location ranged between 52 and 62 dBA Leq. Vehicle traffic noise associated with Florence Avenue is the dominant noise source. There are no outdoor use areas located in this area. The affected commercial building wall is constructed out concrete block and devoid of windows and doors. Interior noise levels are expected to reach up to 45 dBA Leq. Although the proposed project would result in an increase in ambient noise levels and therefore exceed the adjusted noise standards presented in Table 7, this impact would be less than significant.

No mitigation is required.

The adjacent commercial building west of the proposed project is also occupied by commercial businesses and medical offices. Operational noise levels outside of this building at the project’s eastern property line are expected to reach up to 57 dBA Leq (see Figure 6). The representative measured sound level for this location is 76.9 dBA Leq. Vehicle traffic noise associated with Florence Avenue is the dominant noise source. Project generated noise at the commercial/medical building located just west of the proposed project would not exceed adjusted noise standards presented in Table 7. This impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Further, there are no outdoor use areas at these locations and interior noise levels are expected to be approximately 20 dBA lower due to concrete building walls. This impact would be less than significant.

No mitigation is required.

Further, a finding can be made that project generated on-site operational noise would not result in substantial increases in ambient noise levels at the adjacent commercial land uses. This impact is less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Church North of the Project Site
As shown on Figure 6, daytime peak hour project operational noise is expected to reach up to 55 dBA Leq at the existing church located north of the project site and would not exceed the adjusted City’s adjusted noise standards presented in Table 7. This impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required for daytime (7:00 AM-10:00 PM) operation of the proposed project.

Operation of the proposed project would not result in substantial increases in ambient noise levels. No mitigation is required.

Residential Land Uses to the South
As shown on Figure 6, daytime peak hour project operational noise is expected to range between 48 and 59 dBA Leq at existing single family residential land uses located south of the project site and would not exceed the adjusted City’s adjusted noise standards presented in Table 7. This impact would be less than significant.

No mitigation is required.

Nighttime operation of the proposed car wash however, is likely to exceed the adjusted City standards presented in Table 7 and result in a substantial increase in ambient noise levels at existing residential uses south of the project site. This impact would be significant. A mitigation measure limiting the hours of operation of the proposed car wash to between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM would reduce potential impacts to less than significant.

In summary, daytime (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM) operation of the proposed project would not violate City noise standards or result in substantial increases in measured ambient noise levels. Nighttime (10:00 PM and 7:00 AM) operation of the project would likely violate City noise standards and result in substantial increases in ambient noise levels. Implementation of a mitigation measure limiting project operational hours to 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM will reduce potential impacts to a level below significant.

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION IMPACTS
There are several types of construction equipment that can cause vibration levels high enough to annoy persons in the vicinity and/or result in architectural or structural damage to nearby structures and 26 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
27 19278
improvements. For example, as shown in Table 10 a vibratory roller could generate up to 0.21 PPV at a distance of 25 feet; and operation of a large bulldozer (0.089 PPV) at a distance of 25 feet (two of the most vibratory pieces of construction equipment). Groundborne vibration at sensitive receptors associated with this equipment would drop off as the equipment moves away. For example, as the vibratory roller moves further than 100 feet from the sensitive receptors, the vibration associated with it would drop below 0.0026 PPV. It should be noted that these vibration levels are reference levels and may vary slightly depending upon soil type and specific usage of each piece of equipment.

Annoyance to Persons
The primary effect of perceptible vibration is often a concern. However, secondary effects, such as the rattling of a china cabinet, can also occur, even when vibration levels are well below perception. Any effect (primary perceptible vibration, secondary effects, or a combination of the two) can lead to annoyance. The degree to which a person is annoyed depends on the activity in which they are participating at the time of the disturbance. For example, someone sleeping or reading will be more sensitive than someone who is running on a treadmill. Reoccurring primary and secondary vibration effects often lead people to believe that the vibration is damaging their home, although vibration levels are well below minimum thresholds for damage potential. (California Department of Transportation, 2020) As shown in Table 5 vibration becomes distinctly perceptible to people in buildings at a PPV of 0.04.

At approximately one foot, which is the distance to the closest off-site commercial buildings to both the east and the west, use of a vibratory roller would be expected to generate a PPV of 26.25 and a bulldozer would be expected to generate a PPV of 11.125.

At approximately five feet, which is the distance to the nearest residential buildings adjacent to the south of the project site, use of a vibratory roller would be expected to generate a PPV of 2.35 and a bulldozer would be expected to generate a PPV of 0.995.

Use of either a vibratory roller or a bulldozer would clearly be highly annoying to nearby sensitive receptors.

Annoyance is expected to be short-term, occurring only during site grading and preparation. Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts related to annoyance are presented in Section 7 of this report. 27 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
28 19278
Architectural Damage
Vibration generated by construction activity generally has the potential to damage structures. This damage could be structural damage, such as cracking of floor slabs, foundations, columns, beams, or wells, or cosmetic architectural damage, such as cracked plaster, stucco, or tile. (California Department of Transportation, 2020) Table 4 identifies a PPV level of 0.25 as the threshold at which there is a risk to “architectural” damage to historic and some older buildings and a PPV level of 0.3 for older residential structures. Use of vibratory roller equipment within 19 feet and bulldozer equipment within 12 feet of the eastern and western property lines could result in architectural damage. In addition, use of vibratory equipment with 16 feet and bulldozer equipment within 7 feet of the southern property line could result in architectural damage.

Mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to residential dwelling units and commercial structures are presented in Section 7 of this report. Vibration worksheets are included in Appendix G. 28 Table 8 (1 of 2)
CA/T Equipment Noise Emissions and Acoustical Usage Factor Database Equipment Description
Impact
Device?
Acoustical
Use Factor (%)
Spec. Lmax
@ 50ft
(dBA, slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @ 50ft
(dBA, slow)
No. of Actual
Data Samples
(Count)
All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85 -N/A- 0
Auger Drill Rig No 20 85 84 36
Backhoe No 40 80 78 372
Bar Bender No 20 80 -N/A- 0
Blasting Yes -N/A- 94 -N/A- 0
Boring Jack Power Unit No 50 80 83 1
Chain Saw No 20 85 84 46
Clam Shovel (dropping) Yes 20 93 87 4
Compactor (ground) No 20 80 83 57
Compressor (air) No 40 80 78 18
Concrete Batch Plant No 15 83 -N/A- 0
Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 85 79 40
Concrete Pump Truck No 20 82 81 30
Concrete Saw No 20 90 90 55
Crane No 16 85 81 405
Dozer No 40 85 82 55
Drill Rig Truck No 20 84 79 22
Drum Mixer No 50 80 80 1
Dump Truck No 40 84 76 31
Excavator No 40 85 81 170
Flat Bed Truck No 40 84 74 4
Forklift2,3 No 50 n/a 61 n/a
Front End Loader No 40 80 79 96
Generator No 50 82 81 19
Generator (<25KVA, VMS signs) No 50 70 73 74
Gradall No 40 85 83 70
Grader No 40 85 -N/A- 0
Grapple (on backhoe) No 40 85 87 1
Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jack No 25 80 82 6
Hydra Break Ram Yes 10 90 -N/A- 0
Impact Pile Driver Yes 20 95 101 11
Jackhammer Yes 20 85 89 133
Man Lift No 20 85 75 23
Mounted Impact hammer (hoe ram) Yes 20 90 90 212
Pavement Scarafier No 20 85 90 2
Paver No 50 85 77 9
Pickup Truck No 50 85 77 9
Paving Equipment No 50 85 77 9
Pneumatic Tools No 50 85 85 90
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
29 19278
Table 8 (2 of 2)
CA/T Equipment Noise Emissions and Acoustical Usage Factor Database Equipment Description
Impact
Device?
Acoustical
Use Factor (%)
Spec. Lmax
@ 50ft
(dBA, slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @ 50ft
(dBA, slow)
No. of Actual
Data Samples
(Count)
Pumps No 50 77 81 17
Refrigerator Unit No 100 82 73 3
Rivit Buster/chipping gun Yes 20 85 79 19
Rock Drill No 20 85 81 3
Roller No 20 85 80 16
Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle) No 20 85 96 9
Scraper No 40 85 84 12
Shears (on backhoe) No 40 85 96 5
Slurry Plant No 100 78 78 1
Slurry Trenching Machine No 50 82 80 75
Soil Mix Drill Rig No 50 80 -N/A- 0
Tractor No 40 84 -N/A- 0
Vacuum Excavator (Vac-truck) No 40 85 85 149
Vacuum Street Sweeper No 10 80 82 19
Ventilation Fan No 100 85 79 13
Vibrating Hopper No 50 85 87 1
Vibratory Concrete Mixer No 20 80 80 1
Vibratory Pile Driver No 20 95 101 44
Warning Horn No 5 85 83 12
Welder/Torch No 40 73 74 5
Notes:
(1) Source: FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User's Guide January 2006. (2) Warehouse & Forklift Noise Exposure - NoiseTesting.info Carl Stautins, November 4, 2014 http://www.noisetesting.info/blog/carl-strautins/page-3/ (3) Data provided Leq as measured at the operator. Sound Level at 50 feet is calculated using Inverse Square Law.

Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
30 19278
Phase Receptor Location
Existing
Ambient
Noise
Levels
(Leq)2
Construction
Noise Levels
(Leq)
Combined
Noise
Levels
(Leq) Increase (dB)
Reduction
with
Mitigation3
(dB)
Mitigated
Construction
Noise
Levels
(Leq)
Mitigated
Existing Plus
Construction
Noise Levels
(Leq)
Mitigated
Increase in
Ambient Noise
Levels (Leq)
Northwest (Residential) 61 66.6 67.7 6.7 10 56.6 62.3 1.3 Northwest (Church/School) 76.9 77.2 80.1 3.2 10 67.2 77.3 0.4 North (Commercial) 62.1 75.7 75.9 13.8 10 65.7 67.3 5.2 Northeast (Residential) 62.1 66.4 67.8 5.7 10 56.4 63.1 1.0 East (Commercial) 60.6 71.5 71.8 11.2 10 61.5 64.1 3.5
South (Residential) 60.6 81.5 81.5 20.9 10 71.5 71.8 11.2 West (Commercial) 60.6 80.9 80.9 20.3 10 70.9 71.3 10.7 Northwest (Residential) 61 63.4 65.4 4.4 10 53.4 61.7 0.7 Northwest (Church/School) 76.9 73.2 78.4 1.5 10 63.2 77.1 0.2 North (Commercial) 62.1 73.3 73.6 11.5 10 63.3 65.8 3.7 Northeast (Residential) 62.1 65.8 67.3 5.2 10 55.8 63.0 0.9 East (Commercial) 60.6 73.2 73.4 12.8 10 63.2 65.1 4.5
South (Residential) 60.6 82.7 82.7 22.1 10 72.7 73.0 12.4 West (Commercial) 60.6 73.2 73.4 12.8 10 63.2 65.1 4.5
Northwest (Residential) 61 65.8 67.0 6.0 10 55.8 62.1 1.1 Northwest (Church/School) 76.9 75.5 79.3 2.4 10 65.5 77.2 0.3 North (Commercial) 62.1 75.7 75.9 13.8 10 65.7 67.3 5.2 Northeast (Residential) 62.1 68.1 69.1 7.0 10 58.1 63.6 1.5 East (Commercial) 60.6 75.5 75.6 15.0 10 65.5 66.7 6.1
South (Residential) 60.6 84.7 84.7 24.1 10 74.7 74.9 14.3 West (Commercial) 60.6 75.5 75.6 15.0 10 65.5 66.7 6.1
Northwest (Residential) 61 63.5 65.4 4.4 10 53.5 61.7 0.7 Northwest (Church/School) 76.9 73.3 78.5 1.6 10 63.3 77.1 0.2 North (Commercial) 62.1 73.5 73.8 11.7 10 63.5 65.9 3.8 Northeast (Residential) 62.1 65.9 67.4 5.3 10 55.9 63.0 0.9 East (Commercial) 60.6 73.3 73.5 12.9 10 63.3 65.2 4.6
South (Residential) 60.6 82.8 82.8 22.2 10 72.9 73.1 12.5 West (Commercial) 60.6 73.3 73.5 12.9 10 63.3 65.2 4.6
Northwest (Residential) 61 64.2 65.9 4.9 10 54.2 61.8 0.8 Northwest (Church/School) 76.9 74.0 78.7 1.8 10 64.0 77.1 0.2 North (Commercial) 62.1 74.1 74.4 12.3 10 64.1 66.2 4.1 Northeast (Residential) 62.1 66.6 67.9 5.8 10 56.6 63.2 1.1 East (Commercial) 60.6 74.0 74.2 13.6 10 64.0 65.6 5.0
South (Residential) 60.6 83.5 83.5 22.9 10 73.5 73.7 13.1 West (Commercial) 60.6 74.0 74.2 13.6 10 64.0 65.6 5.0
Northwest (Residential) 61 55.9 62.2 1.2 10 45.9 61.1 0.1 Northwest (Church/School) 76.9 65.7 77.2 0.3 10 55.7 76.9 0.0 North (Commercial) 62.1 65.8 67.3 5.2 10 55.8 63.0 0.9
Northeast (Residential) 62.1 58.2 63.6 1.5 10 48.2 62.3 0.2 East (Commercial) 60.6 65.7 66.9 6.3 10 55.7 61.8 1.2
South (Residential) 60.6 75.2 75.3 14.7 10 65.2 66.5 5.9 West (Commercial) 60.6 65.7 66.9 6.3 10 55.7 61.8 1.2
Notes:

Table 9
Construction Noise Levels (Leq)
Architectural
Coating
(1) Construction noise worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

Demolition
Site Preparation
(2) Per measured existing ambient noise levels. STNM4 was used for residential receptors to the northwest, STNM3 for church/school receptors to the northwest, STNM2 for commercial and residential receptors to the north and northeast, and STNM1 for commercial and residential receptors to the east, south, and west.

Grading
Building
Construction
Paving
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
31 19278
PPV at 25 ft, in/sec Approximate Lv* at 25 ft
upper range 1.518 112
typical 0.644 104
upper range 0.734 105
typical 0.170 93

0.202 94
in soil 0.008 66
in rock 0.017 75

0.210 94

0.089 87

0.089 87

0.089 87

0.076 86

0.035 79

0.003 58
Jackhammer
Small Bulldozer
Source: Federal Transit Administration: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, 2018. *RMS velocity in decibels, VdB re 1 micro-in/sec
Construction Equipment Vibration Source Levels
Loaded Trucks
Table 10
Equipment
Pile Driver (impact)
Pile Driver (sonic)
Caisson Drilling
clam shovel drop (slurry wall)
Hydromill (slurry wall)
Vibratory Roller
Hoe Ram
Large Bulldozer
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
32 19278
Figure 6
Peak Hour Operational Noise Levels
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
33 19278
Figure 7
Peak Hour Operational Noise Level Contours
3100 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
34 19278
Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
35 19278

7. MEASURES TO REDUCE IMPACTS

CONSTRUCTION NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES
In addition to adherence to the City of Huntington Park Municipal Code which limits the construction hours of operation, the following measures are recommended to reduce construction noise and vibrations, emanating from the proposed project:

1. During all project construction phases on-site, construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with either properly operating and maintained mufflers or enclosures/acoustical tents (as appropriate) that achieve at least 10 dB reduction from noise level specifications presented in Table 5 of this report.

2. The contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

3. Equipment shall be shut off and not left to idle when not in use.

4. The contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise/vibration sources and sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.

5. Jackhammers, pneumatic equipment and all other portable stationary noise sources shall be shielded and noise shall be directed away from sensitive receptors.

6. The project proponent shall mandate that the construction contractor prohibit the use of music or sound amplification on the project site during construction.

7. The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment.

8. Care should be used when using vibratory rollers and/or any other equivalent vibratory equipment within 19 feet of the eastern and western property lines and 16 feet of the southern property line and bulldozers within 12 feet of the eastern and western property lines and 7 feet of the southern property line where adjacent residential and commercial structures are located.

OPERATIONAL NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES

1. Operation of the proposed car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. 35 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
36 19278

8. REFERENCES
Bolt, Beranek & Newman
1987 Noise Control for Buildings and Manufacturing Plants.

California Department of Transportation
2002 Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations (California Department of Transportation Experiences), Technical Advisory, Vibration TAV-02-01-R9601. February 20.

Environmental Protection Agency
1974 "Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health And Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety," EPA/ONAC 550/9-74-004, March, 1974.

Federal Transit Administration
2006 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Emissions.

FTAVA-90-1003-06.
2018 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Emissions.

Ganddini Group, Inc.
2020 Florence Avenue Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis.

Harris, Cyril M.
1991 Handbook of Acoustical Measurement and Noise Control. Acoustical Society of America. Woodbury, N.Y.

Huntington Park, City of
2017 City of Huntington Park 2030 General Plan.
2020 City of Huntington Park Municipal Code.

Jones & Stokes
2004 Transportation and Construction Induced Vibration Guidance Manual, prepared for the California Department of Transportation - Noise, Vibration, and Hazardous Waste Management Office

Office of Planning and Research
2003 State of California General Plan Guidelines

Riverside, County of
2001 General Plan, Chapter 4, Figure C-3 "Link Volume Capacities/Level of Service for Riverside County Roadways".
2009 County of Riverside Industrial Hygiene Guidelines for Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Structures and County.

U.S. Department of Transportation
2006 FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. January. 36 Florence Avenue Car Wash
Noise Impact Analysis
37 19278

APPENDICES
Appendix A List of Acronyms
Appendix B Glossary
Appendix C Noise Measurement Field Worksheet
Appendix D Construction Noise Modeling
Appendix E Project Generated Trips FHWA Worksheets
Appendix F SoundPLAN Worksheets
Appendix G Vibration Worksheets
Apx - 1

APPENDIX A

LIST OF ACRONYMS
Apx - 2
Term Definition
ADT
ANSI
CEQA
CNEL
D/E/N
dB
dBA or dB(A)
dBA/DD
dBA Leq
EPA
FHWA
L02,L08,L50,L90
DNL
Leq(x)
Leq
Lmax
Lmin
LOS C
OPR
PPV
RCNM
REMEL
RMS
Average Daily Traffic
American National Standard Institute
California Environmental Quality Act
Community Noise Equivalent Level
Day / Evening / Night
Decibel
Decibel "A-Weighted"
Decibel per Double Distance
Average Noise Level over a Period of Time
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Highway Administration
A-weighted Noise Levels at 2 percent, 8 percent, 50 percent, and 90 percent, respectively, of the time period
Day-Night Average Noise Level
Equivalent Noise Level for '"x" period of time
Equivalent Noise Level
Maximum Level of Noise (measured using a sound level meter) Minimum Level of Noise (measured using a sound level meter) Level of Service C
California Governor's Office of Planning and Research
Peak Particle Velocities
Road Construction Noise Model
Reference Energy Mean Emission Level
Root Mean Square
Apx - 3

APPENDIX B

GLOSSARY
Apx - 4
Term Definition
Ambient Noise Level
The all-encompassing noise environment associated with a given environment, at a specified time, usually a composite of sound from many sources, at many directions, near and far, in which usually no particular sound is dominant.

A-Weighted Sound
Level, dBA
The sound level obtained by use of A-weighting. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear.

CNEL
Community Noise Equivalent Level. CNEL is a weighted 24-hour noise level that is obtained by adding five decibels to sound levels in the evening (7:00 PM to 10:00 PM), and by adding ten decibels to sound levels at night (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). This weighting accounts for the increased human sensitivity to noise during the evening and nighttime hours.

Decibel, dB
A logarithmic unit of noise level measurement that relates the energy of a noise source to that of a constant reference level; the number of decibels is 10 times the logarithm (to the base 10) of this ratio.

DNL, Ldn
Day Night Level. The DNL, or Ldn is a weighted 24-hour noise level that is obtained by adding ten decibels to sound levels at night (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). This weighting accounts for the increased human sensitivity to noise during the nighttime hours.

Equivalent Continuous
Noise Level, Leq
A level of steady state sound that in a stated time period, and a stated location, has the same Aweighted sound energy as the time-varying sound.

Fast/Slow Meter
Response
The fast and slow meter responses are different settings on a sound level meter. The fast response setting takes a measurement every 100 milliseconds, while a slow setting takes one every second.

Frequency, Hertz In a function periodic in time, the number of times that the quantity repeats itself in one second (i.e., the number of cycles per second).

L02, L08, L50, L90
The A-weighted noise levels that are equaled or exceeded by a fluctuating sound level, 2 percent, 8 percent, 50 percent, and 90 percent of a stated time period, respectively.

Lmax, Lmin
Lmax is the RMS (root mean squared) maximum level of a noise source or environment measured on a sound level meter, during a designated time interval, using fast meter response. Lmin is the minimum level.

Offensive/ Offending/
Intrusive Noise
The noise that intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of sound depends on its amplitude, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence, and tonal information content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level.

Root Mean Square
(RMS)
A measure of the magnitude of a varying noise source quantity. The name derives from the calculation of the square root of the mean of the squares of the values. It can be calculated from either a series of lone values or a continuous varying function.

Apx - 5

APPENDIX C

NOISE MEASUREMENT FIELD WORKSHEET
Apx - 6
Noise Measurement
Field Data
Project Name: Date:Project #:Noise Measurement #: Technician:Weather: Settings: SLOW FAST Temperature: 81 deg F Wind: 5-10mph Humidity: 54% Terrain:

Start Time: 2:16 PM End Time: 2:31 PM Run Time:

Leq: 60.6 dB
Lmax 74.3 dB
L2 67.0 dBL8 64.2 dB
L25 61.5 dBL50 59.0 dB
NOISE METER: CALIBRATOR:

MAKE: MAKE:MODEL: MODEL:SERIAL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER:

FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

FIELD CALIBRATION DATE:

August 3, 2020Ian Gallagher
Nearest Address or Cross Street: 3100 Florence Avenue, Huntington Park, California.

STNM1 Run Time: 15 minutes ( 1 x 15 minutes )JN 19278Florence Avenue Car Wash, City of Huntington Park.

Primary Noise Source:

Secondary Noise Sources:

Flat
Site Description (Type of Existing Land Use and any other notable features):

SoundTrack LXT Class 1Sunny, clear blue skies.

Larson Davis CAL250
Low altitude full size commercial aircraft, about 1 every 5 minutes. Traffic noise from 486 vehicles traveling along Florence Ave during 15 minutemeasurement. Traffic ambiance from other roads.Project site: Site developed with 2-story commercial medical office building & parking lot. Bordered by Florence Ave to north, residential to south, commercial to east & west. Noise Meeasurement Site: Project site with parking lot & medical building to north & residential to south.

Residential ambiance from nearby residences ( children playing ). Bird song. 4/9/2020 4/2/20208/3/2020
FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

Larson DavisLXT13099
Larson DavisCal 2502733
Apx - 7
Noise Measurement
Field Data
PHOTOS:

STNM1 looking N past 3100 Florence Ave towards Florence Ave & Mission Pl STNM1 looking E across asphalt parking lot towards shops and businesses. intersection. Florence Ave on the left, residences on the right.

Apx - 8
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.043
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0003099
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.402
User Ian Edward Gallagher
Location STNM1 JN 19278 Florence Ave Car Wash 33°58'20.85"N 118°12'44.81"W Job Description 15 minute noise measurement (1 x 15 minutes) Measurement
Start 2020-08-03 14:16:24
Stop 2020-08-03 14:31:24
Duration 00:15:00.0
Run Time 00:15:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre Calibration 2020-08-03 14:13:20
Post Calibration None
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight Z Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamp PRMLxT1L
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Low
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max
Overload 122.6 dB
Results
LAeq 60.6
LAE 90.2
EA 115.103 µPa²h
EA8 3.683 mPa²h
EA40 18.416 mPa²h
LZpeak (max) 2020-08-03 14:27:51 95.0 dB
LASmax 2020-08-03 14:28:03 74.3 dB
LASmin 2020-08-03 14:17:14 48.5 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Statistics
LCeq 70.9 dB LAI2.00 67.0 dB
LAeq 60.6 dB LAI8.00 64.2 dB
LCeq - LAeq 10.3 dB LAI25.00 61.5 dB
LAIeq 62.8 dB LAI50.00 59.0 dB
LAeq 60.6 dB LAI66.60 57.0 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 2.2 dB LAI90.00 52.8 dB
# Overloads 0
SLM_0003099_LxT_Data_043.00.ldbin
Apx - 9
Noise Measurement
Field Data
Project Name: Date:Project #:Noise Measurement #: Technician:Weather: Settings: SLOW FAST Temperature: 81 deg F Wind: 5-10mph Humidity: 54% Terrain:

Start Time: 2:47 PM End Time: 3:02 PM Run Time:

Leq: 62.1 dB
Lmax 82.2 dB
L2 68.5 dBL8 64.6 dB
L25 61.6 dBL50 58.7 dB
NOISE METER: CALIBRATOR:

MAKE: MAKE:MODEL: MODEL:SERIAL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER:

FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

FIELD CALIBRATION DATE:

August 3, 2020Ian Gallagher
Nearest Address or Cross Street: 7132 Benson Street, Huntington Park, California.

STNM2 Run Time: 15 minutes ( 1 x 15 minutes )JN 19278Florence Avenue Car Wash, City of Huntington Park.

Primary Noise Source:

Secondary Noise Sources:

Flat
Site Description (Type of Existing Land Use and any other notable features):

SoundTrack LXT Class 1Sunny, clear blue skies.

Larson Davis CAL250
Low altitude full size commercial aircraft, about 1 every 5 minutes. Traffic noise from 472 vehicles traveling along Florence Ave during 15 minutemeasurement, 8 vehicles along Benson St. Traffic ambiance from other roads.Project site: Site developed with 2-story commercial medical office building & parking lot. Bordered by Florence Ave to north, residential to south, commercial to east & west. Noise Measurement Site: Benson St to west with commercial further west, residential to east, & commercial to southeast.

Residential ambiance. Bird song.
4/9/2020 4/2/20208/3/2020
FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

Larson DavisLXT13099
Larson DavisCal 2502733
Apx - 10
Noise Measurement
Field Data
PHOTOS:

STNM2 looking S down Benson St towards Florence Ave intersection. STNM2 looking NE towards residence 7132 Benson St, Huntington Park.

Apx - 11
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.044
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0003099
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.402
User Ian Edward Gallagher
Location STNM2 JN 19278 Florence Ave Car Wash 33°58'23.38"N 118°12'40.51"W Job Description 15 minute noise measuremnt ( 1 x 15 minutes ) Measurement
Start 2020-08-03 14:47:48
Stop 2020-08-03 15:02:48
Duration 00:15:00.0
Run Time 00:15:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre Calibration 2020-08-03 14:46:07
Post Calibration None
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight Z Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamp PRMLxT1L
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Low
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max
Overload 122.6 dB
Results
LAeq 62.1
LAE 91.7
EA 163.764 µPa²h
EA8 5.240 mPa²h
EA40 26.202 mPa²h
LZpeak (max) 2020-08-03 15:00:21 99.3 dB
LASmax 2020-08-03 14:49:34 82.2 dB
LASmin 2020-08-03 15:02:11 50.5 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Statistics
LCeq 73.7 dB LAI2.00 68.5 dB
LAeq 62.1 dB LAI8.00 64.6 dB
LCeq - LAeq 11.5 dB LAI25.00 61.6 dB
LAIeq 64.4 dB LAI50.00 58.7 dB
LAeq 62.1 dB LAI66.60 57.0 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 2.3 dB LAI90.00 53.5 dB
# Overloads 0
SLM_0003099_LxT_Data_044.00.ldbin
Apx - 12
Noise Measurement
Field Data
Project Name: Date:Project #:Noise Measurement #: Technician:Weather: Settings: SLOW FAST Temperature: 81 deg F Wind: 5-10mph Humidity: 54% Terrain:

Start Time: 3:15 PM End Time: 3:30 PM Run Time:

Leq: 76.9 dB
Lmax 101.1 dB
L2 79.7 dBL8 76.9 dB
L25 74.6 dBL50 71.3 dB
NOISE METER: CALIBRATOR:

MAKE: MAKE:MODEL: MODEL:SERIAL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER:

FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

FIELD CALIBRATION DATE:
4/9/2020 4/2/20208/3/2020
FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

Larson DavisLXT13099
Larson DavisCal 2502733
Primary Noise Source:

Secondary Noise Sources:

Flat
Site Description (Type of Existing Land Use and any other notable features):

SoundTrack LXT Class 1Sunny, clear blue skies.

Larson Davis CAL250
Low altitude full size commercial aircraft, about 1 every 5 minutes. Traffic noise from 490 vehicles travelling along Florence Ave during 15 minutemeasurement. Traffic ambiance from other roads. Lmax ambulance siren at 3:22PMProject site: 2 story commercial building W end of site, surrounded by asphalt parking lot covering the remaining area throughout site. Adjacent: Church and school across Florence Ave N & NW of site, businesses E & NE, elsewhere residential.

Residential ambiance . Bird song.

August 3, 2020Ian Gallagher
Nearest Address or Cross Street: 7125 Mission Pl, Huntington Park, California.

STNM3 Run Time: 15 minutes ( 1 x 15 minutes )JN 19278Florence Avenue Car Wash, City of Huntington Park.

Apx - 13
Noise Measurement
Field Data
PHOTOS:

STNM3 looking ESE down Florance Ave towards Mission Place intersection ( 20 yards ). STNM3 looking N towards church building enyrance 7125 Mission Place, Huntington Park.

Apx - 14
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.045
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0003099
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.402
User Ian Edward Gallagher
Location STNM3 JN 19278 Florence Ave Car Wash 33°58'22.87"N 118°12'45.34"W Job Description 15 minute noise measurement ( 1 x 15 minutes ) Measurement
Start 2020-08-03 15:15:04
Stop 2020-08-03 15:30:04
Duration 00:15:00.0
Run Time 00:15:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre Calibration 2020-08-03 15:14:51
Post Calibration None
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight Z Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamp PRMLxT1L
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Low
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max
Overload 122.8 dB
Results
LAeq 76.9
LAE 106.5
EA 4.915 mPa²h
EA8 157.291 mPa²h
EA40 786.453 mPa²h
LZpeak (max) 2020-08-03 15:21:42 113.3 dB
LASmax 2020-08-03 15:21:43 101.1 dB
LASmin 2020-08-03 15:22:54 56.5 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Statistics
LCeq 81.3 dB LAI2.00 79.7 dB
LAeq 76.9 dB LAI8.00 76.9 dB
LCeq - LAeq 4.3 dB LAI25.00 74.6 dB
LAIeq 80.1 dB LAI50.00 71.3 dB
LAeq 76.9 dB LAI66.60 69.1 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 3.2 dB LAI90.00 64.1 dB
# Overloads 0
SLM_0003099_LxT_Data_045.00.ldbin
Apx - 15
Noise Measurement
Field Data
Project Name: Date:Project #:Noise Measurement #: Technician:Weather: Settings: SLOW FAST Temperature: 81 deg F Wind: 5-10mph Humidity: 54% Terrain:

Start Time: 3:39 PM End Time: 3:54 PM Run Time:

Leq: 61 dB
Lmax 75.8 dB
L2 69.4 dBL8 65.4 dB
L25 60.1 dBL50 57.2 dB
NOISE METER: CALIBRATOR:

MAKE: MAKE:MODEL: MODEL:SERIAL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER:

FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

FIELD CALIBRATION DATE:
4/9/2020 4/2/20208/3/2020
FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

Larson DavisLXT13099
Larson DavisCal 2502733
Primary Noise Source:

Secondary Noise Sources:

Flat
Site Description (Type of Existing Land Use and any other notable features):

SoundTrack LXT Class 1Sunny, clear blue skies.

Larson Davis CAL250
Low altitude full size commercial aircraft, about 1 every 5 minutes. Traffic noise from vehicles traveling along Florence Ave. Traffic noise from 8vehicles traveling along Cedar St during measurement. Ambulance siren at 3:50PM. Project site: Site developed with 2-story commercial medical office building & parking lot. Bordered by Florence Ave to north, residential to south, commercial to east & west. Noise Measurement Site: Cedar St to east with church school uses further east, residential to west and north, parking lot to south with commercial buildings further south.

Residential ambiance, soft music playing. Bird song.

August 3, 2020Ian Gallagher
Nearest Address or Cross Street: 7125 Cedar Street, Huntington Park, California.

STNM4 Run Time: 15 minutes ( 1 x 15 minutes )JN 19278Florence Avenue Car Wash, City of Huntington Park.

Apx - 16
Noise Measurement
Field Data
PHOTOS:

STNM4 looking S down Cedar Street towards Florence Avenue intersection. STNM4 looking NE towards school building 7130 Cedar Street, Huntington Park.

Apx - 17
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.046
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0003099
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.402
User Ian Edward Gallagher
Location STNM4 JN 19278 Florence Ave Car Wash 33°58'24.76"N 118°12'48.60"W Job Description 15 minute noise measurement ( 1 x 15 minutes ) Measurement
Start 2020-08-03 15:39:17
Stop 2020-08-03 15:54:17
Duration 00:15:00.0
Run Time 00:15:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre Calibration 2020-08-03 15:39:05
Post Calibration None
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight Z Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamp PRMLxT1L
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Low
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max
Overload 122.7 dB
Results
LAeq 61.0
LAE 90.5
EA 125.800 µPa²h
EA8 4.026 mPa²h
EA40 20.128 mPa²h
LZpeak (max) 2020-08-03 15:40:18 93.0 dB
LASmax 2020-08-03 15:49:57 75.8 dB
LASmin 2020-08-03 15:44:50 51.2 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Statistics
LCeq 70.1 dB LAI2.00 69.4 dB
LAeq 61.0 dB LAI8.00 65.4 dB
LCeq - LAeq 9.1 dB LAI25.00 60.1 dB
LAIeq 63.5 dB LAI50.00 57.2 dB
LAeq 61.0 dB LAI66.60 56.0 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 2.5 dB LAI90.00 53.9 dB
# Overloads 0
SLM_0003099_LxT_Data_046.00.ldbin
Apx - 18
Noise Measurement
Field Data
Project Name: Date:Project #:Noise Measurement #: Technician:Weather: Settings: SLOW FAST Temperature: 81 deg F Wind: 5-10mph Humidity: 54% Terrain:

Start Time: 4:23 PM End Time: 4:38 PM Run Time:

Leq: 58.5 dB
Lmax 73.2 dB
L2 66.9 dBL8 63.8 dB
L25 58.1 dBL50 52.5 dB
NOISE METER: CALIBRATOR:

MAKE: MAKE:MODEL: MODEL:SERIAL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER:

FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

FIELD CALIBRATION DATE:

August 3, 2020Ian Gallagher
Nearest Address or Cross Street: 3099 Walnut Street, Huntington Park, California.

STNM5 Run Time: 15 minutes ( 1 x 15 minutes )JN 19278Florence Avenue Car Wash, City of Huntington Park.

Primary Noise Source:

Secondary Noise Sources:

Flat
Site Description (Type of Existing Land Use and any other notable features):

SoundTrack LXT Class 1Sunny, clear blue skies.

Larson Davis CAL250
Low altitude full size commercial aircraft, about 1 every 5 minutes. Traffic noise from 18 vehicles traveling along Walnut Street during noisemeasurement.Project site: Site developed with 2-story commercial medical office building & parking lot. Bordered by Florence Ave to north, residential to south, commercial to east & west. Noise Measurement Site: Walnut St to south with residential uses surrouding the noise measurement site.

Residential ambiance. Bird song.
4/9/2020 4/2/20208/3/2020
FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

Larson DavisLXT13099
Larson DavisCal 2502733
Apx - 19
Noise Measurement
Field Data
PHOTOS:

STNM5 looking N towards residence 3099 Walnut Street, Huntington Park. STNM5 looking E down Walnut Street towards State Street intersection.

Apx - 20
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.047
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0003099
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.402
User Ian Edward Gallagher
Location STNM5 JN 19278 Florence Ave Car Wash 33°58'19.34"N 118°12'44.45"W Job Description 15 minute noise measurement ( 1 x 15 minutes ) Measurement
Start 2020-08-03 16:23:31
Stop 2020-08-03 16:38:31
Duration 00:15:00.0
Run Time 00:15:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre Calibration 2020-08-03 16:23:20
Post Calibration None
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight Z Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamp PRMLxT1L
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Low
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max
Overload 122.7 dB
Results
LAeq 58.5
LAE 88.1
EA 70.980 µPa²h
EA8 2.271 mPa²h
EA40 11.357 mPa²h
LZpeak (max) 2020-08-03 16:34:27 99.6 dB
LASmax 2020-08-03 16:35:27 73.2 dB
LASmin 2020-08-03 16:27:10 43.8 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Statistics
LCeq 69.0 dB LAI2.00 66.9 dB
LAeq 58.5 dB LAI8.00 63.8 dB
LCeq - LAeq 10.5 dB LAI25.00 58.1 dB
LAIeq 61.7 dB LAI50.00 52.5 dB
LAeq 58.5 dB LAI66.60 50.1 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 3.2 dB LAI90.00 46.7 dB
# Overloads 0
SLM_0003099_LxT_Data_047.00.ldbin
Apx - 21
Noise Measurement
Field Data
Project Name: Date:Project #:Noise Measurement #: Technician:Weather: Settings: SLOW FAST Temperature: 67 to 81 deg F Wind: 5-10mph Humidity: 54 to 71% Terrain:

Start Time: 7:00 PM End Time: 7:00 PM Run Time:

Leq: 59 dB
Lmax 89.4 dB
L2 64.8 dBL8 62.0 dB
L25 59.2 dBL50 56.0 dB
NOISE METER: CALIBRATOR:

MAKE: MAKE:MODEL: MODEL:SERIAL NUMBER: SERIAL NUMBER:

FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

FIELD CALIBRATION DATE:
4/9/2020 4/2/20208/3/2020
FACTORY CALIBRATION DATE:

Larson DavisLXT13099
Larson DavisCal 2502733
Primary Noise Source:

Secondary Noise Sources:

Flat
Site Description (Type of Existing Land Use and any other notable features):

SoundTrack LXT Class 1Clear skies, sunset/rise 7:51PM/6:06AM Larson Davis CAL250
Low altitude full size commercial aircraft, about 1 every 5 minutes. Traffic noise from vehicles traveling along Florence Avenue.Project site: Site developed with 2-story commercial medical office building & parking lot. Bordered by Florence Ave to north, residential to south, commercial to east & west. Noise Meeasurement Site: Project site with parking lot to north & residential to south.

Residential ambiance. Bird song by day.

Aug 03 to 04, 2020Ian Gallagher
Nearest Address or Cross Street: 3099 Walnut Street, Huntington Park, California.

LTNM1 Run Time: 24 hours ( 24 x 1 hours )JN 19278Florence Avenue Car Wash, City of Huntington Park.

Apx - 22
Noise Measurement
Field Data
PHOTOS:

LTNM1 looking at microphone situated in tree, southern edge of site. LTNM1 looking at location of microphone in site parking lot.

Apx - 23
Summary
File Name on Meter LxT_Data.048
File Name on PC
Serial Number 0003099
Model SoundTrack LxT®
Firmware Version 2.402
User Ian Edward Gallagher
Location LTNM1 JN 19278 Florence Ave Car Wash 33°58'20.62"N 118°12'43.49"W Job Description 24 hour noise measurement ( 24 x 1 hours ) Measurement
Start 2020-08-03 19:00:00
Stop 2020-08-04 19:00:00
Duration 24:00:00.0
Run Time 24:00:00.0
Pause 00:00:00.0
Pre Calibration 2020-08-03 17:35:58
Post Calibration None
Overall Settings
RMS Weight A Weighting
Peak Weight A Weighting
Detector Slow
Preamp PRMLxT1L
Microphone Correction Off
Integration Method Linear
OBA Range Normal
OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3
OBA Freq. Weighting A Weighting
OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max
Overload 122.7 dB
Results
LAeq 59.0
LAE 108.4
EA 7.674 mPa²h
EA8 2.558 mPa²h
EA40 12.791 mPa²h
LApeak (max) 2020-08-03 21:41:00 102.0 dB
LASmax 2020-08-03 21:41:01 89.4 dB
LASmin 2020-08-04 04:34:52 37.6 dB
SEA -99.9 dB
Statistics
LCeq 69.1 dB LAI2.00 64.8 dB
LAeq 59.0 dB LAI8.00 62.0 dB
LCeq - LAeq 10.1 dB LAI25.00 59.2 dB
LAIeq 61.0 dB LAI50.00 56.0 dB
LAeq 59.0 dB LAI90.00 45.8 dB
LAIeq - LAeq 2.0 dB LAI99.00 39.7 dB
# Overloads 0
SLM_0003099_LxT_Data_048.00.ldbin
Apx - 24
Record # Date Time Run Duration Run Time Pause LAeq LASmin LASmin Time LASmax LASmax Time LAS2.00 LAS8.00 LAS25.00 LAS50.00 LAS90.00 LAS99.00 1 2020-08-03 19:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.2 44.5 19:53:32 71.7 19:45:08 64.9 62.7 60.5 58.2 50.3 46.62 2020-08-03 20:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 61.8 46.9 20:01:47 85.7 20:29:49 68.3 63.2 60.8 58.5 52.1 49.33 2020-08-03 21:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 61.8 44.7 21:25:59 89.4 21:41:01 66.6 62.9 60.1 57.2 50.1 45.94 2020-08-03 22:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 60.3 43.6 22:56:45 84.8 22:18:16 65.9 62.4 59.2 55.9 49.1 44.55 2020-08-03 23:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 57.1 41.6 23:44:23 73.4 23:27:04 63.7 60.9 57.9 53.7 45.2 42.66 2020-08-04 00:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 54.7 40.6 00:59:57 69.2 00:25:23 62.2 59.6 55.8 50.7 43.6 42.17 2020-08-04 01:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 53.6 38.8 01:59:22 74.4 01:22:27 60.7 57.8 53.5 49.6 40.4 39.38 2020-08-04 02:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 51.8 37.9 02:59:28 69.8 02:57:26 59.7 56.8 51.6 47.2 39.4 38.59 2020-08-04 03:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 52.9 37.9 03:00:56 65.8 03:58:37 61.3 58.0 53.4 47.2 40.8 38.6 10 2020-08-04 04:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 55.2 37.6 04:34:52 67.4 04:46:37 62.4 60.2 56.5 50.9 41.5 38.711 2020-08-04 05:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 57.7 39.9 05:30:35 69.7 05:42:13 64.3 62.1 59.1 55.1 44.6 41.412 2020-08-04 06:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 58.5 39.7 06:39:10 70.5 06:00:04 64.4 62.9 60.2 56.3 46.3 42.113 2020-08-04 07:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.5 41.8 07:47:06 77.1 07:59:51 65.4 63.3 60.8 57.7 49.2 44.114 2020-08-04 08:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.5 40.4 08:47:07 71.2 08:02:22 64.6 62.9 60.9 58.6 49.9 43.415 2020-08-04 09:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 58.4 42.8 09:31:09 73.9 09:11:44 64.0 61.9 59.8 57.3 49.7 45.216 2020-08-04 10:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 60.3 43.9 10:23:42 82.5 10:48:42 64.9 62.2 59.8 57.3 50.5 45.817 2020-08-04 11:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.1 43.6 11:47:48 81.6 11:14:33 65.0 61.6 59.2 56.9 49.8 45.518 2020-08-04 12:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 61.2 42.6 12:23:09 85.2 12:57:13 67.5 62.6 58.9 56.7 49.8 45.019 2020-08-04 13:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 57.4 41.6 13:25:14 73.0 13:18:25 63.6 60.9 58.3 55.9 48.6 45.020 2020-08-04 14:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 60.0 43.6 14:01:35 82.7 14:50:14 66.0 61.5 58.9 56.8 50.0 45.021 2020-08-04 15:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 61.1 44.4 15:47:00 85.6 15:06:41 64.9 61.4 59.4 57.3 50.1 46.922 2020-08-04 16:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.8 44.6 16:10:57 80.6 16:15:34 66.1 62.5 59.7 57.4 50.5 45.923 2020-08-04 17:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.4 46.2 17:13:16 78.6 17:35:25 64.8 61.8 59.4 57.6 51.9 48.524 2020-08-04 18:00:00 01:00:00.0 01:00:00.0 00:00:00.0 59.6 45.5 18:56:58 74.6 18:45:20 65.7 62.6 60.4 58.2 51.9 48.1 Apx - 25

APPENDIX D

CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODELING
Apx - 26
Construction Phase Equipment Item # of Items Item Lmax at 50 feet, dBA1 Distance to Receptor3 Item Usage Percent Usage Factor Dist. Correction dB Usage Adj. dB Receptor Item Lmax, dBA Receptor Item Leq, dBA Required Mitigation Mitigated Noise Level Reduction (dBA Leq) Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 76 429 20 0.20 -18.7 -7.0 57.3 50.3 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 40.3 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 429 40 0.40 -18.7 -4.0 66.3 62.4 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.4 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 429 40 0.80 -18.7 -1.0 65.3 64.4 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 54.4 Log Sum 66.6 56.6
Grader 1 85 508 40 0.40 -20.1 -4.0 64.9 60.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 50.9 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 508 40 0.40 -20.1 -4.0 63.9 59.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 49.9 Log Sum 63.4 53.4
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 85 508 20 0.20 -20.1 -7.0 64.9 57.9 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 47.9 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 508 40 0.40 -20.1 -4.0 64.9 60.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 50.9 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 508 40 0.80 -20.1 -1.0 63.9 62.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.9 Log Sum 65.8 55.8
Cranes 1 83 508 16 0.16 -20.1 -8.0 62.9 54.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 44.9 Forklifts 2
2 48 508 40 0.80 -20.1 -1.0 27.9 26.9 n/a 26.9
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 508 40 0.80 -20.1 -1.0 63.9 62.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.9 Log Sum 63.5 53.5
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 79 508 40 1.60 -20.1 2.0 58.9 60.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 50.9 Pavers 1 77 508 50 0.50 -20.1 -3.0 56.9 53.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 43.9 Rollers 1 80 508 20 0.20 -20.1 -7.0 59.9 52.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 42.9 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 508 40 0.40 -20.1 -4.0 63.9 59.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 49.9 Log Sum 64.2 54.2
Air Compressors 1 80 508 40 0.40 -20.1 -4.0 59.9 55.9 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 45.9 Log Sum 55.9 45.9
Notes:
(1) Source: Referenced noise levels from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) and the FHWA Roadway Construciton Noise Model User's Guide (January 2006) (2) Source: SoundPLAN reference list.
(3) Distance to receptor calculated from center of site. Construction noise projected from the center of the project site to nearest sensitive use (structure).

Receptor - Residential to Northwest
Site Preparation
Building Construction
Paving

10.0 10.0
Grading
Demolition

10.0 10.0

10.0 Architectural Coating

10.0 Apx - 27
Construction Phase Equipment Item # of Items Item Lmax at 50 feet, dBA1 Distance to Receptor3 Item Usage Percent Usage Factor Dist. Correction dB Usage Adj. dB Receptor Item Lmax, dBA Receptor Item Leq, dBA Required Mitigation Mitigated Noise Level Reduction (dBA Leq) Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 76 127 20 0.20 -8.1 -7.0 67.9 60.9 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 50.9 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 127 40 0.40 -8.1 -4.0 76.9 72.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.9 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 127 40 0.80 -8.1 -1.0 75.9 74.9 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 64.9 Log Sum 77.2 67.2
Grader 1 85 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 74.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 73.6 69.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.7 Log Sum 73.2 63.2
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 85 165 20 0.20 -10.4 -7.0 74.6 67.6 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 57.6 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 74.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 73.6 72.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.7 Log Sum 75.5 65.5
Cranes 1 83 165 16 0.16 -10.4 -8.0 72.6 64.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 54.7 Forklifts 2
2 48 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 37.6 36.7 n/a 36.7
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 73.6 72.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.7 Log Sum 73.3 63.3
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 79 165 40 1.60 -10.4 2.0 68.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Pavers 1 77 165 50 0.50 -10.4 -3.0 66.6 63.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 53.6 Rollers 1 80 165 20 0.20 -10.4 -7.0 69.6 62.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.6 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 73.6 69.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.7 Log Sum 74.0 64.0
Air Compressors 1 80 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 69.6 65.7 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 55.7 Log Sum 65.7 55.7
Notes:
(1) Source: Referenced noise levels from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) and the FHWA Roadway Construciton Noise Model User's Guide (January 2006) (2) Source: SoundPLAN reference list.
(3) Distance to receptor calculated from center of site. Construction noise projected from the center of the project site to nearest sensitive use (structure).

Receptor - Church & School to Northwest
Site Preparation
Building Construction
Paving

10.0 10.0
Grading
Demolition

10.0 10.0

10.0 Architectural Coating

10.0 Apx - 28
Construction Phase Equipment Item # of Items Item Lmax at 50 feet, dBA1 Distance to Receptor3 Item Usage Percent Usage Factor Dist. Correction dB Usage Adj. dB Receptor Item Lmax, dBA Receptor Item Leq, dBA Required Mitigation Mitigated Noise Level Reduction (dBA Leq) Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 76 150 20 0.20 -9.5 -7.0 66.5 59.5 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 49.5 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 150 40 0.40 -9.5 -4.0 75.5 71.5 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 61.5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 150 40 0.80 -9.5 -1.0 74.5 73.5 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 63.5 Log Sum 75.7 65.7
Grader 1 85 162 40 0.40 -10.2 -4.0 74.8 70.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 162 40 0.40 -10.2 -4.0 73.8 69.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.8 Log Sum 73.3 63.3
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 85 162 20 0.20 -10.2 -7.0 74.8 67.8 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 57.8 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 162 40 0.40 -10.2 -4.0 74.8 70.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 162 40 0.80 -10.2 -1.0 73.8 72.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.8 Log Sum 75.7 65.7
Cranes 1 83 162 16 0.16 -10.2 -8.0 72.8 64.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 54.8 Forklifts 2
2 48 162 40 0.80 -10.2 -1.0 37.8 36.8 n/a 36.8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 162 40 0.80 -10.2 -1.0 73.8 72.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.8 Log Sum 73.5 63.5
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 79 162 40 1.60 -10.2 2.0 68.8 70.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.8 Pavers 1 77 162 50 0.50 -10.2 -3.0 66.8 63.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 53.8 Rollers 1 80 162 20 0.20 -10.2 -7.0 69.8 62.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 162 40 0.40 -10.2 -4.0 73.8 69.8 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.8 Log Sum 74.1 64.1
Air Compressors 1 80 162 40 0.40 -10.2 -4.0 69.8 65.8 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 55.8 Log Sum 65.8 55.8
Notes:
(1) Source: Referenced noise levels from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) and the FHWA Roadway Construciton Noise Model User's Guide (January 2006) (2) Source: SoundPLAN reference list.
(3) Distance to receptor calculated from center of site. Construction noise projected from the center of the project site to nearest sensitive use (structure).

10.0 10.0
Architectural Coating

10.0 Receptor - Commercial to North
Site Preparation
Building Construction
Paving

10.0 10.0
Grading
Demolition

10.0 Apx - 29
Construction Phase Equipment Item # of Items Item Lmax at 50 feet, dBA1 Distance to Receptor3 Item Usage Percent Usage Factor Dist. Correction dB Usage Adj. dB Receptor Item Lmax, dBA Receptor Item Leq, dBA Required Mitigation Mitigated Noise Level Reduction (dBA Leq) Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 76 438 20 0.20 -18.9 -7.0 57.1 50.2 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 40.2 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 438 40 0.40 -18.9 -4.0 66.1 62.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 438 40 0.80 -18.9 -1.0 65.1 64.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 54.2 Log Sum 66.4 56.4
Grader 1 85 388 40 0.40 -17.8 -4.0 67.2 63.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 53.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 388 40 0.40 -17.8 -4.0 66.2 62.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.2 Log Sum 65.8 55.8
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 85 388 20 0.20 -17.8 -7.0 67.2 60.2 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 50.2 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 388 40 0.40 -17.8 -4.0 67.2 63.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 53.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 388 40 0.80 -17.8 -1.0 66.2 65.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 55.2 Log Sum 68.1 58.1
Cranes 1 83 388 16 0.16 -17.8 -8.0 65.2 57.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 47.2 Forklifts 2
2 48 388 40 0.80 -17.8 -1.0 30.2 29.2 n/a 29.2
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 388 40 0.80 -17.8 -1.0 66.2 65.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 55.2 Log Sum 65.9 55.9
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 79 388 40 1.60 -17.8 2.0 61.2 63.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 53.2 Pavers 1 77 388 50 0.50 -17.8 -3.0 59.2 56.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 46.2 Rollers 1 80 388 20 0.20 -17.8 -7.0 62.2 55.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 45.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 388 40 0.40 -17.8 -4.0 66.2 62.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.2 Log Sum 66.6 56.6
Air Compressors 1 80 388 40 0.40 -17.8 -4.0 62.2 58.2 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 48.2 Log Sum 58.2 48.2
Notes:
(1) Source: Referenced noise levels from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) and the FHWA Roadway Construciton Noise Model User's Guide (January 2006) (2) Source: SoundPLAN reference list.
(3) Distance to receptor calculated from center of site. Construction noise projected from the center of the project site to nearest sensitive use (structure).

10.0 10.0
Architectural Coating

10.0 Receptor - Residential to Northeast
Site Preparation
Building Construction
Paving

10.0 10.0
Grading
Demolition

10.0 Apx - 30
Construction Phase Equipment Item # of Items Item Lmax at 50 feet, dBA1 Distance to Receptor3 Item Usage Percent Usage Factor Dist. Correction dB Usage Adj. dB Receptor Item Lmax, dBA Receptor Item Leq, dBA Required Mitigation Mitigated Noise Level Reduction (dBA Leq) Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 76 245 20 0.20 -13.8 -7.0 62.2 55.2 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 45.2 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 245 40 0.40 -13.8 -4.0 71.2 67.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 57.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 245 40 0.80 -13.8 -1.0 70.2 69.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.2 Log Sum 71.5 61.5
Grader 1 85 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 74.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 73.6 69.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.7 Log Sum 73.2 63.2
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 85 165 20 0.20 -10.4 -7.0 74.6 67.6 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 57.6 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 74.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 73.6 72.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.7 Log Sum 75.5 65.5
Cranes 1 83 165 16 0.16 -10.4 -8.0 72.6 64.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 54.7 Forklifts 2
2 48 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 37.6 36.7 n/a 36.7
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 73.6 72.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.7 Log Sum 73.3 63.3
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 79 165 40 1.60 -10.4 2.0 68.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Pavers 1 77 165 50 0.50 -10.4 -3.0 66.6 63.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 53.6 Rollers 1 80 165 20 0.20 -10.4 -7.0 69.6 62.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.6 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 73.6 69.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.7 Log Sum 74.0 64.0
Air Compressors 1 80 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 69.6 65.7 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 55.7 Log Sum 65.7 55.7
Notes:
(1) Source: Referenced noise levels from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) and the FHWA Roadway Construciton Noise Model User's Guide (January 2006) (2) Source: SoundPLAN reference list.
(3) Distance to receptor calculated from center of site. Construction noise projected from the center of the project site to nearest sensitive use (structure).

10.0 10.0
Architectural Coating

10.0 Receptor - Commercial to East
Site Preparation
Building Construction
Paving

10.0 10.0
Grading
Demolition

10.0 Apx - 31
Construction Phase Equipment Item # of Items Item Lmax at 50 feet, dBA1 Distance to Receptor3 Item Usage Percent Usage Factor Dist. Correction dB Usage Adj. dB Receptor Item Lmax, dBA Receptor Item Leq, dBA Required Mitigation Mitigated Noise Level Reduction (dBA Leq) Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 76 77 20 0.20 -3.8 -7.0 72.2 65.3 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 55.3 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 77 40 0.40 -3.8 -4.0 81.2 77.3 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 67.3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 77 40 0.80 -3.8 -1.0 80.2 79.3 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 69.3 Log Sum 81.5 71.5
Grader 1 85 55 40 0.40 -0.8 -4.0 84.2 80.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 70.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 55 40 0.40 -0.8 -4.0 83.2 79.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 69.2 Log Sum 82.7 72.7
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 85 76 20 0.20 -3.6 -7.0 81.4 74.4 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 64.4 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 55 40 0.40 -0.8 -4.0 84.2 80.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 70.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 55 40 0.80 -0.8 -1.0 83.2 82.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 72.2 Log Sum 84.7 74.7
Cranes 1 83 55 16 0.16 -0.8 -8.0 82.2 74.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 64.2 Forklifts 2
2 48 55 40 0.80 -0.8 -1.0 47.2 46.2 n/a 46.2
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 55 40 0.80 -0.8 -1.0 83.2 82.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 72.2 Log Sum 82.8 72.9
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 79 55 40 1.60 -0.8 2.0 78.2 80.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 70.2 Pavers 1 77 55 50 0.50 -0.8 -3.0 76.2 73.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 63.2 Rollers 1 80 55 20 0.20 -0.8 -7.0 79.2 72.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 55 40 0.40 -0.8 -4.0 83.2 79.2 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 69.2 Log Sum 83.5 73.5
Air Compressors 1 80 55 40 0.40 -0.8 -4.0 79.2 75.2 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 65.2 Log Sum 75.2 65.2
Notes:
(1) Source: Referenced noise levels from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) and the FHWA Roadway Construciton Noise Model User's Guide (January 2006) (2) Source: SoundPLAN reference list.
(3) Distance to receptor calculated from center of site. Construction noise projected from the center of the project site to nearest sensitive use (structure).

Architectural Coating

10.0 Receptor - Residential to South
Site Preparation
Building Construction
Paving

10.0 10.0
Grading
Demolition

10.0 10.0

10.0 Apx - 32
Construction Phase Equipment Item # of Items Item Lmax at 50 feet, dBA1 Distance to Receptor3 Item Usage Percent Usage Factor Dist. Correction dB Usage Adj. dB Receptor Item Lmax, dBA Receptor Item Leq, dBA Required Mitigation Mitigated Noise Level Reduction (dBA Leq) Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 76 83 20 0.20 -4.4 -7.0 71.6 64.6 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 54.6 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 83 40 0.40 -4.4 -4.0 80.6 76.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 66.6 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 83 40 0.80 -4.4 -1.0 79.6 78.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 68.6 Log Sum 80.9 70.9
Grader 1 85 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 74.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 73.6 69.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.7 Log Sum 73.2 63.2
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 85 165 20 0.20 -10.4 -7.0 74.6 67.6 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 57.6 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 85 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 74.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 73.6 72.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.7 Log Sum 75.5 65.5
Cranes 1 83 165 16 0.16 -10.4 -8.0 72.6 64.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 54.7 Forklifts 2
2 48 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 37.6 36.7 n/a 36.7
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 84 165 40 0.80 -10.4 -1.0 73.6 72.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 62.7 Log Sum 73.3 63.3
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 79 165 40 1.60 -10.4 2.0 68.6 70.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 60.7 Pavers 1 77 165 50 0.50 -10.4 -3.0 66.6 63.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 53.6 Rollers 1 80 165 20 0.20 -10.4 -7.0 69.6 62.6 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 52.6 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 84 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 73.6 69.7 Muffler (10 dB Reduction) 59.7 Log Sum 74.0 64.0
Air Compressors 1 80 165 40 0.40 -10.4 -4.0 69.6 65.7 Enclosure or Acoustic Tent (10 dB Reduction) 55.7 Log Sum 65.7 55.7
Notes:
(1) Source: Referenced noise levels from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) and the FHWA Roadway Construciton Noise Model User's Guide (January 2006) (2) Source: SoundPLAN reference list.
(3) Distance to receptor calculated from center of site. Construction noise projected from the center of the project site to nearest sensitive use (structure).

Architectural Coating

10.0 Receptor - Commercial to West
Site Preparation
Building Construction
Paving

10.0 10.0
Grading
Demolition

10.0 10.0

10.0 Apx - 33

APPENDIX E

PROJECT GENERATED TRIPS FHWA WORKSHEETS
Apx - 34
FHWA Sound32 Spreadsheet
Project Traffic Noise
DAYTIME NIGHTTIME ADT 134.00 #VALUE!
AUTOS M.TRUCKS H.TRUCKS AUTOS M.TRUCKS H.TRUCKS SPEED 35.00 ---------------------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- DISTANCE 50.00 INPUT PARAMETERS 0.32
Vehicles per hour 2.71 0.06 0.03 2.71 0.06 0.03 % A 97.00 % DAY 50.00 48.50 77.60 Speed in MPH 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 % NIGHT 50.00 48.50 4.85 Left angle -90.00 -90.00 -90.00 -90.00 -90.00 -90.00 14.55 Right angle 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 % MT 2.00 % DAY 50.00 1.00 1.60 % NIGHT 50.00 1.00 0.10
NOISE CALCULATIONS 0.30
Reference levels 65.11 74.83 80.05 65.11 74.83 80.05 % HT 1.00 % DAY 50.00 0.50 0.80 % NIGHT 50.00 0.50 0.05
ADJUSTMENTS 0.15
Flow -1.42 -18.28 -21.29 -1.42 -18.28 -21.29
Distance -0.07 -0.07 -0.07 -0.07 -0.07 -0.07 LEFT -90.00 Finite Roadway 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RIGHT 90.00 Barrier 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ldn 46.83
Constant -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 -25.00 DAY LEQ 40.42 LEQ 38.62 31.48 33.69 38.62 31.48 33.69 Day hour 89.00
Absorbtive? no TO TURN ON, COPY K2 TO J2
DAY LEQ 40.42 NIGHT LEQ 40.42 Use hour? no TO TURN OFF, ENTER ADTS IN J2 GRADE dB 0.00
Apx - 35

APPENDIX F

SOUNDPLAN WORKSHEETS
Apx - 36
Frequency spectrum [dB(A)] Corrections
Source name ReferenceLevel 20 25 31 40 50 63 80 100125160200250315400500630800 1 1.31.6 2 2.53.2 4 5 6.3 8 10 12.516 20 Cwall CICT dB(A)Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz kHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzkHzdB dBdB Car Wash Drying System Lw/unitDay98.7 - 45.252.558.364.773.775.471.872.877.677.175.385.395.192.785.082.180.982.583.983.183.280.178.977.573.871.868.463.656.345.6 - - - Blower/Vacuum End1 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End2 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End3 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End4 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End5 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End6 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End7 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End8 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End9 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End10 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End11 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End12 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End13 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End14 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End15 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End16 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End17 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End18 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End19 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End20 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End21 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End22 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End23 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End24 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End25 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End26 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End27 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End28 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End29 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End30 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End31 Lw/unitDay84.7 - - - - - 42.946.658.061.063.878.881.083.074.375.977.275.376.176.776.676.876.975.375.174.70.069.0 - - - - - - - Blower/Vacuum End33 Lw/unitDay67.711.014.020.024.037.042.036.047.049.048.050.050.052.053.054.058.059.055.057.058.056.057.054.055.053.053.048.043.041.037.031.0 - - - Blower/Vacuum End34 Lw/unitDay67.711.014.020.024.037.042.036.047.049.048.050.050.052.053.054.058.059.055.057.058.056.057.054.055.053.053.048.043.041.037.031.0 - - - Noise emissions of industry sources
GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana CA 92705 USA Apx - 37
Limit Level w/o NP Level w NP Difference Conflict
No. Receiver name Building Floor Day Day Day Day Day
side dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB dB
1 1 North 1.Fl - 48.4 0.0 -48.4 -
2 2 - 1.Fl - 46.9 0.0 -46.9 -
3 3 - 1.Fl - 55.1 0.0 -55.1 -
4 4 - 1.Fl - 43.9 0.0 -43.9 -
5 5 - 1.Fl - 41.4 0.0 -41.4 -
6 6 - 1.Fl - 58.9 0.0 -58.9 -
7 7 West 1.Fl - 65.2 0.0 -65.2 -
8 8 East 1.Fl - 56.6 0.0 -56.6 -
Receiver list
GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana CA 92705 USA Apx - 38
Level w/o NP Level w NP
Source name Traffic lane Day Day
dB(A) dB(A)
1 1.Fl 48.4 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 35.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 36.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 36.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 37.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 38.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 39.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 39.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 21.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 20.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 19.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 19.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 18.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 18.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 20.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 21.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 21.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 21.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 21.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 21.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 22.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 22.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 33.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 32.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 32.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 32.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 32.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 31.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 31.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 31.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 32.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 32.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 17.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 16.4 -
Car Wash Drying System - 38.3 -
2 1.Fl 46.9 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 29.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 29.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 29.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 29.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 29.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 29.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 30.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 33.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 33.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 33.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 33.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 33.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 32.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 33.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 33.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 33.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 32.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 33.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 33.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 33.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 32.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 31.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 31.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 31.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 29.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 29.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 28.9 -
Contribution levels of the receivers
GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana CA 92705 USA Apx - 39
Level w/o NP Level w NP
Source name Traffic lane Day Day
dB(A) dB(A)
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 28.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 28.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 28.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 28.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 9.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 12.5 -
Car Wash Drying System - 35.6 -
3 1.Fl 55.1 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 39.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 38.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 38.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 38.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 38.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 38.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 38.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 38.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 37.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 37.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 36.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 36.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 37.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 36.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 36.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 37.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 37.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 37.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 37.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 39.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 39.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 42.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 42.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 42.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 43.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 43.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 43.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 43.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 42.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 42.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 41.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 18.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 18.9 -
Car Wash Drying System - 38.7 -
4 1.Fl 43.9 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 18.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 22.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 28.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 28.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 28.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 28.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 28.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 29.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 29.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 28.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 28.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 28.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 29.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 26.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 26.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 28.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 28.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 28.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 27.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 27.4 -
Contribution levels of the receivers
GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana CA 92705 USA Apx - 40
Level w/o NP Level w NP
Source name Traffic lane Day Day
dB(A) dB(A)
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 27.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 28.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 29.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 29.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 29.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 29.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 29.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 30.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 30.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 30.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 30.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 7.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 9.3 -
Car Wash Drying System - 32.8 -
5 1.Fl 41.4 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 20.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 20.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 20.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 20.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 20.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 27.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 27.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 17.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 15.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 16.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 15.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 15.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 16.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 18.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 18.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 18.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 18.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 18.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 20.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 20.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 19.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 21.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 22.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 22.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 21.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 23.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 21.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 21.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 20.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 22.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 21.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 12.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 14.7 -
Car Wash Drying System - 39.9 -
6 1.Fl 58.9 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 20.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 20.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 21.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 21.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 21.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 19.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 18.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 22.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 23.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 24.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 27.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 28.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 29.8 -
Contribution levels of the receivers
GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana CA 92705 USA Apx - 41
Level w/o NP Level w NP
Source name Traffic lane Day Day
dB(A) dB(A)
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 34.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 34.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 32.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 32.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 29.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 28.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 27.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 26.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 20.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 19.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 19.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 19.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 18.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 17.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 17.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 18.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 18.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 18.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 11.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 11.9 -
Car Wash Drying System - 58.8 -
7 1.Fl 65.2 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 28.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 26.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 25.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 25.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 25.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 25.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 24.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 31.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 32.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 34.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 29.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 31.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 38.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 43.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 43.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 42.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 41.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 36.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 34.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 33.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 32.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 29.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 29.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 29.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 29.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 29.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 22.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 22.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 22.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 22.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 22.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 14.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 10.6 -
Car Wash Drying System - 65.0 -
8 1.Fl 56.6 0.0
Blower/Vacuum End1 - 42.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End2 - 41.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End3 - 41.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End4 - 40.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End5 - 38.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End6 - 38.0 -
Contribution levels of the receivers
GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana CA 92705 USA Apx - 42
Level w/o NP Level w NP
Source name Traffic lane Day Day
dB(A) dB(A)
Blower/Vacuum End7 - 36.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End8 - 22.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End9 - 22.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End10 - 22.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End11 - 22.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End12 - 22.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End13 - 22.9 -
Blower/Vacuum End14 - 30.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End15 - 33.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End16 - 33.8 -
Blower/Vacuum End17 - 34.2 -
Blower/Vacuum End18 - 34.7 -
Blower/Vacuum End19 - 35.5 -
Blower/Vacuum End20 - 36.4 -
Blower/Vacuum End21 - 36.6 -
Blower/Vacuum End22 - 40.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End23 - 41.3 -
Blower/Vacuum End24 - 42.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End25 - 43.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End26 - 44.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End27 - 45.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End28 - 46.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End29 - 47.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End30 - 48.1 -
Blower/Vacuum End31 - 49.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End33 - 17.0 -
Blower/Vacuum End34 - 15.2 -
Car Wash Drying System - 40.3 -
Contribution levels of the receivers
GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana CA 92705 USA Apx - 43

APPENDIX G

VIBRATION WORKSHEETS
Apx - 44
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/7/20
Source: Large Bulldozer
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.089 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 1.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 11.125 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
2 Large Bulldozer

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Commercial to East & West
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 45
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/7/20
Source: Large Bulldozer
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.089 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 5.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 0.995 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
2 Large Bulldozer

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Residential to South
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 46
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/21/20
Source: Large Bulldozer
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.089 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 12.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 0.268 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
2 Large Bulldozer

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Residential to South
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 47
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/21/20
Source: Large Bulldozer
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.089 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 13.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 0.237 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
2 Large Bulldozer

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Commercial to East & West
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 48
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/7/20
Source: Vibratory Roller
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.21 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 1.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 26.250 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
1 Vibratory Roller

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Commercial to East & West
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 49
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/7/20
Source: Vibratory Roller
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.21 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 5.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 2.348 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
1 Vibratory Roller

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Residential to South
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 50
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/21/20
Source: Vibratory Roller
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.21 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 20.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 0.293 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
1 Vibratory Roller

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Residential to South
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 51
Project: 19278 Florence Avenue Car Wash Date: 8/21/20
Source: Vibratory Roller
Scenario: Unmitigated
Location:

Address:

PPV = PPVref(25/D)^n (in/sec)
Equipment =
Type
PPVref = 0.21 Reference PPV (in/sec) at 25 ft.

D = 23.00 Distance from Equipment to Receiver (ft)
n = 1.50 Vibration attenuation rate through the ground
PPV = 0.238 IN/SEC OUTPUT IN BLUE

RESULTS
1 Vibratory Roller

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION ANALYSIS
Commercial to East & West
INPUT

INPUT SECTION IN GREEN
Note: Based on reference equations from Vibration Guidance Manual, California Department of Transportation, 2006, pgs 38-43.

Apx - 52
GANDDINI GROUP INC.
714.795.3100 | ganddini.com