Agenda, second session — Indian Wells City Council, April 21, 2022 (part 2 of 3)

SECTION 3. Description of Improvements and Any Substantial Changes Proposed. The improvements within the District include: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services for street lighting and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the streetlights or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of the street lighting and appurtenant facilities within the District. The Annual Levy Report describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

SECTION 4. Boundaries and Designation. The boundaries of the District are previously defined in the formation documents of the original District and include Tract Nos. 21650 and 3292-R, which comprise a portion of Riverside County Service Area No. 121. The District is designated as “Indian Wells Street Lighting District No. 2000-1”.

SECTION 5. Public Hearing. The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a Public Hearing concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the Act. Notice is hereby given that a public meeting and hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells for this purpose on Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 1:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City Council Chambers of the City of Indian Wells, 44-950 Eldorado Drive, Indian Wells, California 92210.

SECTION 6. Notice. A “Resolution of Intention” shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation once at least ten days before the public hearing on annual levies; and posting a copy of the Resolution of Intention in three (3) public places within the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022.

____________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

128

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-13

Page 3 ends

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-13

I, Angelica Avila, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five (5); that the above and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells the 21st day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ____________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
129

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN

WELLS, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL

LEVY REPORT FOR THE INDIAN WELLS STREET LIGHTING
DISTRICT NO. 2000-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells (the “City Council”) has by previous Resolutions ordered the preparation of the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (the “Report”) for the district known and designated as Indian Wells Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 (the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”); and WHEREAS, the District and the associated assessments are in compliance with the provisions of California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and WHEREAS, this City Council has examined and reviewed the Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the Report and each and all budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed, as set forth in said Report.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2. That the Report as presented consists of the following:
a.A Description of the Improvements
b.The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Services, Operation and Maintenance)
SECTION 3. The Report is hereby APPROVED on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Levy Report.

ATTACHMENT #2
130

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-14

Page 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022.

____________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ ____________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
131

City of Indian Wells
Street Lighting District No. 2000-1
2022/2023 ENGINEER’S REPORT
Intent Meeting: April 21, 2022
Public Hearing: May 19, 2022
27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T 951.587.3500|800.755.6864
F 951.587.3510|888.326.6864
Property Tax Information Line
T.866.807.6864
www.willdan.com
Exhibit "A"
132

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Street Lighting District No. 2000-1
City of Indian Wells
Riverside County, State of California
This Report describes the District including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022/2023, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside Cou nty Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this ____________ day of ______________, 2022.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Indian Wells
By: ________________________________
Chonney Gano, Project Manager
District Administration Services
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
P. E. # C 81888
133

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW 1
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT 2
A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY 2
B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT 2
C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT 3
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 4
A. GENERAL 4
B. PROPOSITION 218 BENEFIT ANALYSIS 4
C. BENEFIT ANALYSIS 5
D. METHODOLOGY 6
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS 7
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS 7
B. FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 DISTRICT BUDGET 9
APPENDIX A -DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAPS 10
APPENDIX B - 2022/2023 ASSESSMENT ROLL 12
134

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 1
I. OVERVIEW

The City of Indian Wells (the “City”) annually levies and collects special assessments in order to provide and maintain the improvements within the Indian Wells Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 (the “District”). The boundary of the District includes Tract 21650 and Tract 3292-R, which consists of a portion of Riverside County Service Area (the “CSA”) No. 121 that was annexed to the City as “Indian Wells Annexation No. 13” by order of Resolution No. 2000-12 of the City of Indian Wells City Council (the “City Council”) on March 16, 2000. The annexation authorized the City to continue levying assessments previously approved and authorized to be levied by CSA 121 in order to continue street lighting services previously provided by that CSA and now provided by the City. The District was formed on October 2000 and provides a mechanism to continue levying assessments for street lighting services within the boundaries of the District. The District assessments described in this Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) are prepared and levied annually pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “1972 Act”) and Article XIIID of the California Constitution (the “Article”) which was enacted with the passage of Proposition 218 in November 1996.

This Report describes the District, any changes to the District, and the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2022/2023. The assessments are based on the City’s estimate of the annual costs to maintain the improvements that provide direct and special benefits to properties within the District. The improvements within the District, the corresponding costs, and the annual levy are budgeted. The assessment includes expenditures, deficits, surpluses, revenue, and reserve funds.

For the purposes of this Report, the word “parcel” refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (the “APN”) by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County (the “County”) Auditor/Controller uses the APN and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties assessed for special district benefit assessments on the tax roll.

Following consideration of the public comments and written protests at a noticed public hearing, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the Council may order the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 pursuant to the 1972 Act. In such case, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel in Fiscal Year 2022/2023.

135

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 2
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY

The boundaries of the District include Tract 21650 and Tract 3292-R, which consists of the portion of Riverside County Service Area No. 121 that was annexed into the City as “Indian Wells Annexation No. 13” by order of Resolution No. 2000 - 12 of the City Council on March 16, 2000.

The District’s boundaries are comprised of the streets and parcels that are located within the territory that is defined as the area South of Fred Waring Drive between Elkhorn Trail and Warner Trail; North of Arapahoe Drive between Elkhorn Drive and Dakota Trail; and North of Blackfoot Drive between Dakota Trail and Warner Trail.

B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT

As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities.
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
• The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices;
136

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 3
• Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5.
• Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "Maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury.
• The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT

The improvements for the District may be generally described as follows: the operation, maintenance and servicing of the street lighting and appurtenant facilities located in public places within the boundary of the District. “Maintenance” means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the street lighting and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of the streetlights or appurtenant facilities. “Servicing” means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of the street lighting and appurtenant facilities.

Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer where they are available for public inspection.

137

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 4
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL

Pursuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of Proposition 218, the costs of the District are apportioned by a formula or method, which fairly distributes the net amount to be assessed among the assessable parcels in proportion to the special benefits to be received by each such parcel from the improvements. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the agency to separate the general benefit from special benefit, whereas only speci al benefits are assessable.

Each parcel within the District receives special benefits from the improvements due to the close proximity of the lighting improvements to each parcel. The proposed assessments are at the same rate as those imposed by the County under the CSA. Since the assessments are not new, not increased, and are for street lighting, they are currently exempt from the procedures and approval process of Proposition 218.

B. PROPOSITION 218 BENEFIT ANALYSIS

In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Section 2(d) of the Article defines District as follows:

“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property -related service”;

Section 2(i) the Article defines Special Benefit as follows:

“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”

Section 4(a) the Article defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:

“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be 138

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 5
imposed on any parcel which e xceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”

This District was formed to establish and provide for the improvements that enhance the presentation of the surrounding properties and developments . These improvements will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District.

The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the existing District as well as provide for the annual maintenance of those improvements, and the assessment revenues generated by District will be used solely for such purposes.

The costs of the proposed improvements have been identified and allocated to properties within the District based on special benefit. The improvements to be provided by this District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as an essential component and local amenity that provides a direct reflection and extension of the properties within the District which the property owners and residents have expressed a high level of support.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) set forth in the Report is based on the premise that each assessed property receives specia l benefits from the landscape and lighting improvements within the District, and the assessment obligation for each parcel reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefits as compared to other properties that receive special benefits.

To identify and determine the proportional special benefit to each parcel within the District, it is necessary to consider the entire scope of the improvements provided as well as the properties that benefit from those improvements. The improvements and the associated costs described in this Report, have been carefully reviewed and have been identified and allocated based on a benefit rationale and calculations that proportionally allocate the net cost of only those improvements determined to be of special benefit to properties within the District. The various public improvements and the associated costs have been identified as either “general benefit” (not assessed) or “special benefit”.

C. BENEFIT ANALYSIS

The improvements associated with the District are part of the overall development plan for these parcels and were specifically installed for the benefit and development of the parcels. The benefit of street lighting conferred upon the parcels within the District includes the convenience, safety, and security of properties, improvements and goods. Specifically:

1. Enhanced deterrence of crime – an aid to police protection.

2. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.
139

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 6

3. Improved visibility of pedestrians and motorists.

4. Improved ingress and egress to and from property.

5. Reduced vandalism, damage to improvements or property, and other criminal acts.

6. Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.

7. Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties.

D. METHODOLOGY

The cost to provide maintenance and services of the improvements within the District is fairly and equitably distributed among each assessable parcel based upon the estimated special benefits received by each parcel.

The District is comprised of single-family residential parcels with the exception of two parcels identified as common areas or public property. The residential lots receive the same special benefit from the improvements due to their similarity in size and use and their similar proximity to the improvements. Therefore, each assessable lot is assessed an equal amount.

For Fiscal Year 2022/2023, the assessment rate will be the total balance to levy divided by the number of assessable residential lots.

The assessed lots or parcels of real property within the District are listed on the Assessment Roll, which is provided as Appendix B of this report. The Assessment Roll provides a listing of the assessable parcels and their respective assessment for Fiscal Year 2022/2023. The specific lines and dimensions of the parcels are more particularly described on the County Assessor’s Parcel Map, which is on file in the Office of the Riverside County Assessor and by reference is made a part of this Report.

The maximum assessment rate for the District is the same as the rate approved under the CSA ($47.74 per parcel) and is to be used for the same purpose – maintaining and servicing the existing streetlights within the District. As part of the annexation process of this unincorporated area to the City, it was detached from the CSA. However, the annexation process specifically allowed the City to continue the imposition of these assessments for street lighting purposes. 140

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 7
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS

The following section describes the services and costs that are funded through the District and are shown in the District Budget.

Maintenance Costs

Labor, Material and Equipment – Includes labor, material and equipment required to properly maintain and service the street lighting and appurtenant facilities within the District. The improvements within the District will be ma intained and serviced on a regular basis by the City. The specific maintenance operations required for the District, and the frequency thereof, are to be determined by City Staff.

Utilities

Electric – The furnishing of electricity for the operation of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities.

Capital Replacement Costs

Repairs – Unforeseen repairs not normally included in the yearly maintenance cost. This may include repair of damage due to vandalism or weather.

Upgrades – Planned upgrades of the improvements that provide a direct benefit to the District may also be included in capital replacement costs. Examples of upgrades are additional street lighting facilities and/or renovating existing street lighting facilities.

Reserves

Operating Reserves – Reserves to be accumulated for maintenance services for the first six months of each fiscal year until tax monies become available for maintenance costs.

Administrative Services

City Staff – The cost of City Staff’s efforts in coordinating the maintenance and servicing of the improvements, responding to public concerns, and levying and collecting the assessments. This includes reimbursement for time spent by Finance and Accounting, the City Attorney, the City Manager, and the Public Works Staff.

141

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 8
Professional Services – The cost of contracting with professionals to provide services specific to the levy of assessments and annual administration of the District.

County Administration Fees

Assessment Collection – The fees charged by the County to place the assessments on the property tax rolls and collect the assessments from property owners.

Carryover/(Deficit) Prior Year

Available Funds – Any funds that are not expended in the prior fiscal year shall be included to offset maintenance costs in the current fiscal year. If the total funds in any fiscal year are insufficient to offset maintenance costs, a loan from other City funds shall be a deficit of the District and shall be included and repaid as the costs and assessments for the subsequent fiscal year.

Assessable Lots

Current and Planned Lots – Any subdivided residential lots and parcels planned for subdivision into residential lots within the District.

142

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 9
B. FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 DISTRICT BUDGET

BUDGET ITEM AMOUNT

Direct Costs

Maintenance - Labor, Material and Equipment

$100
Utilities – Electric 700
Capital Replacement Costs - Repairs and Upgrades 50 Reserves - Operating Reserves 959
Direct Costs Subtotal $1,809

Administrative Costs

Administrative Services - City Staff

$200
Administrative Services - Professional Services 320 County Administration Fees – Assessment Collection 10 Administrative Costs Subtotal $530

Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Assessment

Total Direct and Administrative Costs

$2,339
Carryover (Deficit) Prior Years – Available Funds 0 Balance to Levy (1) $2,339

Assessable Lots – Current and Planned Lots 49
Annual Assessment Per Parcel $47.74

(1) Balance to Levy rounded to the nearest dollar

143

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 10

APPENDIX A -DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAPS
The Boundary Diagrams for the original districts have previously been submitted to the Clerk of the City in the format required under the Act and are made part of this Report by reference.

The parcel identification, lines and dimensions of each parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the Assessor Maps of Riverside County for the year in which this Report was prepared and is incorporated by reference and made part of this Report.
144

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 11

145

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 12
APPENDIX B - 2022/2023 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the Riverside County Assessor Parcel Maps and/or the Riverside County Secured Tax Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include government owned land; public utility owned property, land principally encumbered with public right -of-ways or easements and dedicated common areas. These parcels will not be assessed.

A listing of parcels within the District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this Report.

Upon approval of the Report, and confirmation of the assessments, the assessment information will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax roll in Fiscal Year 2022/2023. If the parcels or assessment numbers within the District and referenced in this Report, are re-numbered, re-apportioned or changed by the County Assessor’s Office after approval of the Report, th e new parcel or assessment numbers with the appropriate assessment amount will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller. If the parcel change made by the County includes a parcel split, parcel merger or tax status change, the assessment amount submitt ed on the new parcels or assessment numbers will be based on the method of apportionment and levy amount approved in this Report by the City Council.

146

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 13
Assessment Roll

Assessor's Parcel
Number (1)
Fiscal Year 2022/2023
Assessment Amounts
633-324-001 47.74
633-324-002 47.74
633-324-003 47.74
633-324-004 47.74
633-324-005 47.74
633-324-006 47.74
633-324-007 47.74
633-324-008 47.74
633-324-009 47.74
633-324-010 47.74
633-324-011 47.74
633-324-012 47.74
633-324-013 47.74
633-324-014 47.74
633-324-015 47.74
633-324-016 47.74
633-324-017 47.74
633-324-018 47.74
633-700-001 47.74
633-700-002 47.74
633-700-003 47.74
633-700-004 47.74
633-700-005 47.74
633-700-006 47.74
633-700-007 47.74
633-700-008 47.74
633-700-009 47.74
633-700-010 47.74
633-700-011 47.74
633-700-012 47.74
633-700-013 47.74
633-700-014 47.74
633-700-015 47.74
633-700-021 47.74
633-700-022 47.74
633-700-023 47.74
633-700-024 47.74
633-700-025 47.74
633-700-026 47.74
633-700-027 47.74
633-700-028 47.74
633-700-029 47.74
633-700-030 47.74
633-700-031 47.74
147

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 14
Assessor's Parcel
Number (1)
Fiscal Year 2022/2023
Assessment Amounts
633-700-032 (2) 0.00
633-700-033 47.74
633-700-034 47.74
633-700-035 47.74
633-700-036 47.74
633-700-037 47.74
Total Assessment $2,339.26
(1) Parcel 633-300-007 split to parcels 633-324-001 through 633-324-018 in Fiscal Year 2021/2022.
(2) Parcel 633-700-032 is an open space parcel owned by the Village at Indian Wells Homeowner Association and thus is not assessed as the benefit is shared by the residents within the development.

148

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:RES-017-22 Item #:G.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - Finance April 21,
2022
Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Annual Levy of Landscape and Lighting District No. 91-1 and Declare Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council ADOPTS Resolution No. 2022-15 initiating the proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for the Landscape and Lighting District (LLMD) No. 91-1 and declaring intention to order the levy and collection of assessments; and SCHEDULES a noticed Public Hearing on May 19, 2022 to hear public testimony on the proposed levy; and
ADOPTS Resolution No. 2022-16 preliminarily approving the annual engineer’s report regarding the Landscape and Lighting District No. 91-1 for fiscal year 2022-23 DISCUSSION:

The City is responsible for the collection of levies for the citywide Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 91-1 (the “LLMD”). The LLMD contains seventeen active landscape and lighting districts located primarily along Highway 111. The City operates twelve of the districts and respective homeowner’s associations operate the remaining five districts.

Each year the City Council conducts a public hearing to act on costs to operate and maintain the landscape and maintenance districts. The public hearing will be held on Thursday, May 19, 2022, to receive public testimony and consider approval of the fiscal year 2022-23 levy. The Engineer’s Report provides a complete budget detail for the landscape and lighting maintenance districts.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™149

File #:RES-017-22 Item #:G.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The preliminary levy amounts to operate the LLMD for Fiscal Year 2022-23 per the Engineer’s Report are as follows:

Annual
Maximum Levy Prior Year Proposed Increase
Zone Description Allowed per EDU Levy per EDU Levy per EDU (Decrease) A1 Eldorado $ 220.39 $ 106.45 $ 123.86 $ 17.41 A2 Montecito/Stardust $ 463.64 $ 438.91 $ 440.18 $ 1.27 A3 Casa Dorado (A Pass-through District) $ 212.88 $ 206.21 $ 212.42 $ 6.21 A5B The Cove (A Pass-through District) $ 330.00 $ 320.14 $ 322.34 $ 2.20 A8 Indian Wells Golf Resort $ 635.09 $ 578.72 $ 634.60 $ 55.88 A11A Hwy. 111 & Club Drive $ 307.73 $ 148.89 $ 172.82 $ 23.93 A11C Club Drive $ 199.69 $ 192.87 $ 198.80 $ 5.93 C The Colony $ 3,810.77 $ 928.91 $ 985.16 $ 56.25 D Colony Cove Estates $ 10,955.69 $ 918.18 $ 969.63 $ 51.45 E Desert Horizons (A Pass-through District) $ 725.38 $ 703.05 $ 725.38 $ 22.33 A19 Mountain Gate $ 1,163.28 $ 776.00 $ 815.00 $ 39.00 A20 Mountain Gate Estates $ 1,131.59 $ 835.71 $ 867.86 $ 32.15 A21 Villagio $ 2,380.99 $ 1,090.71 $ 1,106.38 $ 15.67 A22 Vaidya $ 895.14 $ 373.08 $ 415.38 $ 42.30 A23 Montelena $ 1,278.86 $ 1,020.83 $ 1,069.44 $ 48.61 A25 Sundance (A Pass-through District) $ 1,400.92 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,094.44 $ 44.44 A26 Province (A Pass-through District) $ 1,469.50 $ 1,426.69 $ 1,468.80 $ 42.11 The total cost to operate the districts during Fiscal Year 2022-23 is $1,777,070. The City provides $135,735 in administrative and field support to all seventeen Districts. These costs are paid by the City and are not reflected in the calculation of the annual levy. In addition, the City pays a total of $102,398 to eight landscape districts that provide a general benefit to the City.

District reserves contribute $92,050 and the remaining $1,446,887 of the costs to operate the landscape and lighting maintenance districts is collected from property owners living within the districts.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Initiate

2. Resolution - Engineer’s Report
City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™150

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-15

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS,

CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNUAL LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL

ASSESSMENTS FOR THE INDIAN WELLS LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 91-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells (the “City Council”) has by previous Resolutions, formed the Indian Wells Landscape and Lighting District No. 91-1 (the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (the “Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Riverside for the City of Indian Wells to pay the maintenance and services of lighting facilities, landscaping and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and WHEREAS, the District and the associated assessments are in compliance with the provisions of California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3, SECTION 22622, 22624 AND 22626 OF THE ACT, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Annual Levy Report. The City Council hereby orders Willdan Financial to prepare the Annual Levy Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the Act.

SECTION 2. Intention. The City Council hereby declares that it intends to seek the annual levy of the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22624 of the Act, over and including the land within the District boundary, and to levy and collect assessments on all such land to pay the costs of the following: the operation, maintenance and servicing of lighting, landscaping and all appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto.

SECTION 3. Description of Improvements and Any Substantial Changes Proposed. The improvements within the District include: the maintenance, capital improvements, and operation of and furnishing of services and materials for street lighting facilities, fencing, detention basins, open space areas, landscaping, irrigation systems, bike paths, pedestrian pathways, slope maintenance, graffiti abatement, local parks and entry monuments; landscaping including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems and drainage devices within the District. The Annual Levy Report describes all new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements.

ATTACHMENT #1
151

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-15

Page 2 ends

SECTION 4. Boundaries and Designation. The boundaries of the District are described as the boundaries previously defined in the formation documents of the original District. The District includes seventeen (17) Zones: (A1) Eldorado; (A2) Rancho Palmeras Estates APN 634-04; (A3) Tract Nos. 2752, 3097 and 4853; (A5B) a sub-zone within A5A “The Cove”; (A8) three (3) parcels south of Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel along Hwy 111 east of Eldorado Drive; (A11A) Highway 111 South at Club Dr.; (A11C) Club Dr. eight (8) parcels; (D) Parcel Map No. 26494; (C) the Colony; (E) north of Highway 111 west of Eldorado Drive, east of Cook Street and south of Whitewater River Channel; (A19) Mountain Gate Tract No. 26595; (A20) Mountain Gate Tract No. 27747-1; (A21) Villagio Tract No. 29502; (A22) Vaidya Tract No. 27747; (A23) Montelena Tract No. 31200, (A25) Sundance Tract No. 27104, (A26) Province Tract No. 32880. The District is designated as “Indian Wells Landscape and Lighting District No. 91-1”.

Indian Wells City Hall
44-950 Eldorado Drive
Indian Wells, CA 92210

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022.

______________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

152

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-15

Page 3 ends

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-15

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ______________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY

153

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-16

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS,

CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE INDIAN WELLS LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 91-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells (the “City Council”) has by previous Resolutions ordered the preparation of the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (the “Report”) for said district known and designated as Indian Wells Landscape and Lighting District No. 91-1 (the “District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”); and WHEREAS, the District and the associated assessments are in compliance with the provisions of California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID; and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Report as required by Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 22566 of said Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and reviewed the Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed within each Benefit Zone, as set forth in said Report.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2. That the Report, as presented consists, of the following:
a.A Description of the Improvements
b.The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Services, Operation and Maintenance)
SECTION 3. The Report is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Levy Report.

ATTACHMENT #2
154

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-16

Page 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022.

______________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-16

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ______________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY

155

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

Street Lighting District No. 2000-1

City of Indian Wells
Riverside County, State of California

This Report describes the District including the improvements, budgets, parcels and assessments to be levied for Fiscal Year 2022/2023, as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside Cou nty Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this ____________ day of ______________, 2022.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Indian Wells

By: ________________________________
Chonney Gano, Project Manager
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
P. E. # C 81888

157

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 1
I. OVERVIEW

159

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 2
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY

B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT

C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT

Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer where they are available for public inspection.

161

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 4
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL

B. PROPOSITION 218 BENEFIT ANALYSIS

In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Section 2(d) of the Article defines District as follows:

“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property -related service”;

Section 2(i) the Article defines Special Benefit as follows:

“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”

Section 4(a) the Article defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 5
imposed on any parcel which e xceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”

C. BENEFIT ANALYSIS

1. Enhanced deterrence of crime – an aid to police protection.

2. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.
163

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 6

3. Improved visibility of pedestrians and motorists.

4. Improved ingress and egress to and from property.

5. Reduced vandalism, damage to improvements or property, and other criminal acts.

6. Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.

7. Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties.

D. METHODOLOGY

For Fiscal Year 2022/2023, the assessment rate will be the total balance to levy divided by the number of assessable residential lots.

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 7
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS

The following section describes the services and costs that are funded through the District and are shown in the District Budget.

Maintenance Costs

Utilities

Electric – The furnishing of electricity for the operation of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities.

Capital Replacement Costs

Repairs – Unforeseen repairs not normally included in the yearly maintenance cost. This may include repair of damage due to vandalism or weather.

Reserves

Operating Reserves – Reserves to be accumulated for maintenance services for the first six months of each fiscal year until tax monies become available for maintenance costs.

Administrative Services

165

County Administration Fees

Assessment Collection – The fees charged by the County to place the assessments on the property tax rolls and collect the assessments from property owners.

Carryover/(Deficit) Prior Year

Assessable Lots

Current and Planned Lots – Any subdivided residential lots and parcels planned for subdivision into residential lots within the District.

166

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 9
B. FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 DISTRICT BUDGET

BUDGET ITEM AMOUNT

Direct Costs

Maintenance - Labor, Material and Equipment

$100
Utilities – Electric 700
Capital Replacement Costs - Repairs and Upgrades 50 Reserves - Operating Reserves 959
Direct Costs Subtotal $1,809

Administrative Costs

Administrative Services - City Staff

$200
Administrative Services - Professional Services 320 County Administration Fees – Assessment Collection 10 Administrative Costs Subtotal $530

Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Assessment

Total Direct and Administrative Costs

$2,339
Carryover (Deficit) Prior Years – Available Funds 0 Balance to Levy (1) $2,339

Assessable Lots – Current and Planned Lots 49
Annual Assessment Per Parcel $47.74

(1) Balance to Levy rounded to the nearest dollar

167

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 10

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 11

169

A listing of parcels within the District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this Report.

170

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 13
Assessment Roll
Assessor's Parcel
Number (1)
Fiscal Year 2022/2023
Assessment Amounts
633-324-001 47.74
633-324-002 47.74
633-324-003 47.74
633-324-004 47.74
633-324-005 47.74
633-324-006 47.74
633-324-007 47.74
633-324-008 47.74
633-324-009 47.74
633-324-010 47.74
633-324-011 47.74
633-324-012 47.74
633-324-013 47.74
633-324-014 47.74
633-324-015 47.74
633-324-016 47.74
633-324-017 47.74
633-324-018 47.74
633-700-001 47.74
633-700-002 47.74
633-700-003 47.74
633-700-004 47.74
633-700-005 47.74
633-700-006 47.74
633-700-007 47.74
633-700-008 47.74
633-700-009 47.74
633-700-010 47.74
633-700-011 47.74
633-700-012 47.74
633-700-013 47.74
633-700-014 47.74
633-700-015 47.74
633-700-021 47.74
633-700-022 47.74
633-700-023 47.74
633-700-024 47.74
633-700-025 47.74
633-700-026 47.74
633-700-027 47.74
633-700-028 47.74
633-700-029 47.74
633-700-030 47.74
633-700-031 47.74
171

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 14
Assessor's Parcel
Number (1)
Fiscal Year 2022/2023
Assessment Amounts
633-700-032 (2)0.00
633-700-033 47.74
633-700-034 47.74
633-700-035 47.74
633-700-036 47.74
633-700-037 47.74
Total Assessment $2,339.26
(1) Parcel 633-300-007 split to parcels 633-324-001 through 633-324-018 in Fiscal Year 2021/2022.
(2) Parcel 633-700-032 is an open space parcel owned by the Village at Indian Wells Homeowner Association and thus is not assessed as the benefit is shared by the residents within the development. 172

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:RES-018-22 Item #:H.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - Finance April 21, 2022
Initiating Proceedings, Preliminarily Approving the Annual Levy Report, and Declaring Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments for Annual Levy for City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2022-23
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council ADOPTS Resolution No. 2022-17 initiating proceedings for annual levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for the City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982; and SCHEDULES a noticed Public Hearing on May 19, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. to hear public testimony on the proposed levy; and
ADOPTS Resolution No. 2022-18 preliminarily approving the annual engineer’s report regarding the City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 and the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982; and
ADOPTS Resolution No. 2022-19 declaring its intention to order the levy and collection of assessments for the City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™173

File #:RES-018-22 Item #:H.

The City is responsible for levying the annual drainage maintenance assessment in accordance with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218.

Council will hold a noticed Public Hearing on Thursday, May 19, 2022 at 1:30p.m. to hear public testimony on the proposed levy. As a condition of approval for the Province development in 2006, the City required the developer to install and guarantee the maintenance of storm water control structures. The structures consist of two drywells located at the northeast corner of Desert Horizons Drive and Vista Del Ray Drive.

These drywells serve to remove nuisance water and storm water coming from the Province development into neighboring developments. The City preforms monthly inspections and schedules semi-annual “clean outs” of the drywells to ensure their effective operation.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The annual levy is $73.68 per assessed parcel. The City anticipates collecting $8,800 from 133 assessed parcels inside the gates at the Province. The City records District revenues into a Special Revenue fund to operate the District as described in the attached engineer’s report.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution - Initiate

2. Resolution - Engineer’s Report

3. Resolution - Declaring to Order
City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
DISCUSSION:

Location of Dry Wells
174

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-17

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN

WELLS, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEVY
AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

FOR THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, PURSUANT TO THE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells (the “City Council”) by previous Resolutions formed and established the annual levy of assessments for the City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 (the “Assessment District”), pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter

6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California commencing with section 54703 (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Act authorizes the City Council to levy and collect assessments for the Assessment District to pay for the costs and expenses of operating, maintaining, and servicing drainage improvements, and appurtenant facilities located within public places within the boundaries of the District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to initiate proceedings for the levy and collection of annual assessments against lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23 pursuant to provisions of the Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan to assist with the annual levy of the Assessment District.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Improvements. The drainage improvements for the assessment District are briefly described as:

Installation, construction, or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, including, but not limited to, drainage improvements and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof.

SECTION 2. Extension of Existing Assessments. The City Council hereby DETERMINES that to provide the drainage improvements described in Section 1 of this Resolution, it is necessary to levy and collect assessments against lots and parcels within the Assessment District. The City Council hereby DECLARES that the property owners previously approved the existing assessments in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID and the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 comply with said approval and provisions.

ATTACHMENT #1
175

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-17

Page 2 ends

SECTION 3. Finance Director. The Finance Director of the City of Indian Wells is hereby AUTHORIZED and DIRECTED to take all action necessary and appropriate in connection with the annual levy and collection of assessments for the Assessment District.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022.

____________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-17

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ ____________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY

176

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-18

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN

WELLS, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING OF THE
ENGINEER’S REPORT REGARDING THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
1, AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells (the “City Council”) has by Resolution ordered the preparation of the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report (the “Engineer’s Report”) in connection with the City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 (the “Assessment District”), and levy and collection of assessments against lots and parcels of land within the territory for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, to pay the maintenance, servicing and operation of the improvements, pursuant to provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California commencing with section 54703 (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, the Assessment District Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Indian Wells and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council such report entitled “City of Indian Wells Engineer’s Annual Levy Report for the Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 Fiscal Year 2022-23” (the “Report”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and reviewed the Report as presented, and is satisfied with the Report including, without limitation, each of the budget items and documents as set forth therein and is satisfied that the assessments have been spread in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed, as set forth in said Report.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That the above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. That the Report as presented consists of the following:
(a)A Description of Improvements; and,
(b)The Annual Budget (Costs and Expenses of Services, Operations and Maintenance); and,
ATTACHMENT #2
177

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-18

Page 2 ends

(c) The Method of Apportionment and the proposed amount to be levied and collected against each Assessor’s Parcel within Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

SECTION 3. The Report is hereby APPROVED on a preliminary basis and ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Report.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022.

____________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-18

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ ____________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
178

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

Street Lighting District No. 2000-1

City of Indian Wells
Riverside County, State of California

Dated this ____________ day of ______________, 2022.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Indian Wells

By: ________________________________
Chonney Gano, Project Manager
District Administration Services

By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
P. E. # C 81888

180

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 1
I. OVERVIEW

182

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 2
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
A. DISTRICT BOUNDARY

B. IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED BY THE 1972 ACT

C. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT

Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the office of the City Clerk and the City Engineer where they are available for public inspection.

184

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 4
III. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. GENERAL

B. PROPOSITION 218 BENEFIT ANALYSIS

In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the Article addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Section 2(d) of the Article defines District as follows:

“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property -related service”;

Section 2(i) the Article defines Special Benefit as follows:

“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”

Section 4(a) the Article defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 5
imposed on any parcel which e xceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.”

C. BENEFIT ANALYSIS

1. Enhanced deterrence of crime – an aid to police protection.

2. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.
186

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 6

3. Improved visibility of pedestrians and motorists.

4. Improved ingress and egress to and from property.

5. Reduced vandalism, damage to improvements or property, and other criminal acts.

6. Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.

7. Increased promotion of business during nighttime hours in the case of commercial properties.

D. METHODOLOGY

For Fiscal Year 2022/2023, the assessment rate will be the total balance to levy divided by the number of assessable residential lots.

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 7
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
A. DESCRIPTION OF BUDGET ITEMS

The following section describes the services and costs that are funded through the District and are shown in the District Budget.

Maintenance Costs

Utilities

Electric – The furnishing of electricity for the operation of the landscaping and appurtenant facilities.

Capital Replacement Costs

Repairs – Unforeseen repairs not normally included in the yearly maintenance cost. This may include repair of damage due to vandalism or weather.

Reserves

Operating Reserves – Reserves to be accumulated for maintenance services for the first six months of each fiscal year until tax monies become available for maintenance costs.

Administrative Services

188

County Administration Fees

Assessment Collection – The fees charged by the County to place the assessments on the property tax rolls and collect the assessments from property owners.

Carryover/(Deficit) Prior Year

Assessable Lots

Current and Planned Lots – Any subdivided residential lots and parcels planned for subdivision into residential lots within the District.

189

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 9
B. FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 DISTRICT BUDGET

BUDGET ITEM AMOUNT

Direct Costs

Maintenance - Labor, Material and Equipment

$100
Utilities – Electric 700
Capital Replacement Costs - Repairs and Upgrades 50 Reserves - Operating Reserves 959
Direct Costs Subtotal $1,809

Administrative Costs

Administrative Services - City Staff

$200
Administrative Services - Professional Services 320 County Administration Fees – Assessment Collection 10 Administrative Costs Subtotal $530

Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Assessment

Total Direct and Administrative Costs

$2,339
Carryover (Deficit) Prior Years – Available Funds 0 Balance to Levy (1) $2,339

Assessable Lots – Current and Planned Lots 49
Annual Assessment Per Parcel $47.74

(1) Balance to Levy rounded to the nearest dollar

190

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 10

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 11

192

A listing of parcels within the District, along with the proposed assessment amounts, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this Report.

193

2022/2023 Street Lighting District No. 2000-1 Page 13
Assessment Roll

195

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-19

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN

WELLS, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER

THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE CITY OF

INDIAN WELLS DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 PURSUANT TO THE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells (the “City Council”) has by Resolution initiated proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments against lots and parcels of land within the City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1 (the “Assessment District”) for Fiscal Year 2021/22, under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California commencing with section 54703 (the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial as the Assessment District Engineer to assist with the annual levy of assessments in accordance with the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Intention. The City Council hereby DECLARES its intention to order the drainage improvements of the Assessment District and to levy and collect assessments against lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, to pay for the costs and expenses of operating, maintaining and servicing drainage improvements therein as outlined in the original Engineer’s Report, filed with the City Clerk and approved by the City Council in connection with the formation and the levy of the assessment.

SECTION 2. Authority. Pursuant to the Act, the City Council may annually determine the cost of the services that are financed by the assessment and, by ordinance or resolution order the levy of an annual assessment. However, no annual assessment shall exceed the maximum assessment amount established in the original Report and approved by the property owners without additional approval of the property owners in accordance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID.

SECTION 3. Boundaries and Designation. The territory of the proposed Assessment District is within the boundaries and authority of the City of Indian Wells within the County of Riverside, State of California. The boundary map describing the Assessment District is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Assessment District is designated and shall be referred to as the:
“City of Indian Wells Drainage Maintenance Benefit Assessment District No. 1.” ATTACHMENT #3
196

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-19

Page 2 ends

SECTION 4. Description of Drainage Improvements. The proposed drainage improvements for the Assessment District are briefly described as the operation, maintenance, servicing and administration of the improvements, and incidental expenses related thereto for the Assessment District located within the boundary of the City of Indian Wells, and the jurisdiction of the City Council. The drainage improvements and the installation and/or maintenance of such improvements for the District can be described as follows:

Installation, construction or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, including, but not limited to, drainage improvements and any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the aforementioned or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof.

SECTION 5. Public Hearing. The City Council hereby DECLARES its intention to conduct a Public Hearing concerning the improvements, and the levy of assessments for the Assessment District in accordance with the Act. Notice is hereby given that on Thursday, May 19, 2022, at 1:30 P.M., the City Council will hold a Public Hearing on the question of the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2022-23 against lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District, or as soon thereafter as feasible. The Public Hearing will be held at the City Council Chambers of the City of Indian Wells, 44- 950 Eldorado Drive, Indian Wells, California at the times fixed. At the hearing, all interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.

SECTION 6. Notice. A Public Hearing Notice shall be published in a local newspaper of general circulation once a week for two (2) weeks, the first publication appearing not less than fourteen (14) days before the date of hearing; and posting a copy of the Public Hearing Notice in three (3) public places within the City.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022.

___________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

197

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-19

Page 3 ends

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-19

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ ____________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY

198

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:059-22 Item #:I.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - Indian Wells Golf Resort April 21, 2022
Supplemental Appropriation for Food Truck Credenza Replacement at the Indian Wells Golf Resort
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Council APPROVES Supplemental appropriation of $12,000 for Food Truck Credenza Replacement at the Indian Wells Golf Resort.

DISCUSSION:

Golf Resort staff (“Staff”) has notified the City of an unsafe condition at the food truck. Staff is operating the food truck using an external service counter to improve the customer service experience and increase ancillary spending. The external service counter was constructed onsite, out of existing equipment including two old, repurposed bourbon barrels and a rubber utility cart. This look created an attractive, fun, and relaxed environment at the food truck.

During a recent visit from the County health inspector, it was revealed that Staff cannot use the carts for anything related to food service as they cannot be properly sanitized. The County health inspector required installation of a portable hand washing station at the food truck site as well.

Golf Resort staff recommends replacing the existing external counter with a purpose-built counter that meets all public health code requirements for sanitation & hand washing.

Fiscal Impact
Golf Resort staff obtained high level estimates to replace the counter and recommends replacement of the food truck credenza at a price not to exceed $12,000. This is an unplanned capital improvement and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $12,000 is required.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™199

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:060-22 Item #:J.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - Public Works April 21, 2022 Authorization to Advance Capital Improvement Funds for the Purchase of a Fleet Truck
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council APPROVES the advancement of budgeted Capital Improvement funds for the purchase of a fleet truck; and
AUTHORIZES and DIRECTS the City Manager or his designee to execute the purchase of the vehicle per the City’s purchase policy.

DISCUSSION:

During the biennial budget process, the Council approved and funded a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23, which includes the purchase of a fleet vehicle. Due to supply chain issues, the City is delayed in receiving the vehicle ordered in July of 2021 until July 2022 at the earliest.

The City’s fleet truck being replaced is used by the Building Inspector. The City purchased the vehicle in 2008 and the use is to perform building inspections around the City. The vehicle became inoperable this year, the expected useful life of a truck is 5 to 7 years. The truck has experienced maintenance issues and has now exceeded its useful life and is requiring expensive repairs. To ensure the replacement truck is delivered as soon as possible, Staff is requesting an advanced funding from Fiscal Year 2023 to the current fiscal year for the replacement of the additional fleet truck.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost of the new fleet truck is $36,101.23 and is budgeted in the 2022-23 Fiscal Year. Staff is requesting to advance the funds into the current Fiscal Year 2021-22.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™200

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:RES-019-22 Item #:K.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - Public Works April 21, 2022 Approval of Citywide Speed Limit Survey
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council APPROVES the 2022 Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limits in Indian Wells; and ADOPTS Resolution No. 2022-20 Setting Speed Limits on Public City Streets and rescinding Resolution 2011-39.

DISCUSSION:

Summary:

City Council is required to approve speed limits throughout the City of Indian Wells, pursuant to California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 40802, which states local agencies are required to re-evaluate non-statutory spend limits during specified times every 5, 7, or 10 years, dependent on the circumstances.

On December 15, 2011, City Council approved Resolution 2011-39 designating speed limits for certain City roads. These speed limits, and subsequent approvals were extended for the 10-year maximum. Once the expiration date is reached, law enforcement may have difficulty in assessing punitive actions for traffic violations. As such, A city-wide radar speed survey was conducted on 17 road segments in January 2022 by Hartzog & Crabill. Several factors are utilized to establish speed limit recommendations including critical speed (speed at or below which 85 permit of the traffic is moving), the 10-mph pace bracket, a field review, and review of street accident history.

The 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey prepared by Hartzon & Crabill confirms that existing speed limits are appropriate for the public streets located in Indian Wells and no changes are warranted.

Staff concurs with these findings. A copy of the Engineering and Traffic survey is attached. The survey results will be shared with Caltrans, the California Highway Patrol, and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. The Resolution for Council’s consideration includes all the street segments reviewed and surveyed.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™201

File #:RES-019-22 Item #:K.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. 2022 Engineering & Traffic Survey
City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™202

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-20

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN
WELLS, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2011-39

AND DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS FOR CERTAIN SPECIFIED

LOCAL STREETS
WHEREAS, Title 11, Section 11.20.030 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code allows the City Council to designate speed limits for certain local streets; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 2011-39 designating certain speed limits; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to rescind said Resolution No. 2010-06; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to designate local speed limits in accordance with the California Vehicle Code so that the speed limits may be enforced by radar; and WHEREAS, said designation shall be made by Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, hereby rescinds Resolution No. 2011-39 and approves the following designated speed limits as most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and to be reasonably safe:

Street Segment Speed Limits/Effective Until
Cook Street Fairway Drive to Highway 111 35 mph/December 2027 Cook Street Fred Waring Drive to Highway
111
40 mph/December 2027
Eldorado Drive Fairway Drive to Highway 111 35 mph/December 2027 Eldorado Drive Fred Waring Drive to Highway
111
40 mph/December 2027
Fairway Drive Cook Street to Rancho
Palmeras Drive
35 mph/December 2027
Fairway Drive Rancho Palmeras Drive to
Eldorado Drive
35 mph/December 2027
Fred Waring Drive Phyllis Jackson Lane to Cook
Street
45 or 25* mph/December 2027
(*25 mph When Children Present)
Fred Waring Drive Cook Street to Washington
Street
50 or 25* mph/December 2027
(*25 mph When Children Present)
Hwy 111 Eastern City Limit to Club
Drive (Former CalTrans PM

34.4 – PM 35.98)
50 mph/December 2027
Hwy 111 Club Drive to Cook Street 45 mph/December 2027
ATTACHMENT #1
203

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-20

Page 2 ends

(Former CalTrans PM

35.98 to PM 37.63)
Hwy 111 Cook Street to Western City
Limit (Former CalTrans PM

37.63 to PM 37.9)
45 mph/December 2027
Street Segment Speed Limits/Effective Until
Hovley Lane East East to West City Boundary 45 mph/December 2027

Miles Avenue Washington Street to
Highway 111
50 mph/December 2027
Portola Avenue Mockingbird Trail to north of
Haystack Road
40 mph/December 2027
Rancho Palmeras Drive Fairway Drive to Highway 111

35 mph/December 2027
Warner Trail Fred Warning Drive to Miles
Avenue
35 or 25* mph/December 2027
(*25 mph When Children Present)
Washington Street
(Southbound)
Fred Waring Drive to South
City Limit
50 mph/December 2027
All other public residential
streets not specifically listed
Miscellaneous 25 mph Prima Facie limit
(California Vehicle Code 22352)

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st of April 2022.

_________________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR

204

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-20

Page 3 ends

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-20

I, Angelica Avila, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five (5); that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells on the 21st day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

__________________________________ ____________________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
205

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY

FOR SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF

INDIAN WELLS
MARCH 2022
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
44950 EL DORADO DRIVE
INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA 92210
PREPARED BY:

HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERS
17852 E. 17TH STREET, SUITE 101
TUSTIN, CA 92780
(714) 731-9455
ATTACHMENT #2
206

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ i Traffic Engineer's Certification ...................................................................................................... ii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Basic Speed Law ............................................................................................................................. 2 Prima Facie Speed Limits ............................................................................................................... 2 Establishment of Speed Zones ........................................................................................................ 2 Data Collection Procedures ............................................................................................................. 3 Speed Zoning Methodology ............................................................................................................ 3 Speed Zone Survey ......................................................................................................................... 4 Local Street Exemptions ................................................................................................................. 5 Other Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 5 Radar Collection Time-Frames ....................................................................................................... 5 Analysis Factors .............................................................................................................................. 5 Field Review ................................................................................................................................... 6 Accident History ............................................................................................................................. 7 Results and Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 7 Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes" ............................................................................ 7 Support Explanations for "No Speed Limit Changes" ........................................................ 8

Summary of Recommendations .....................................................................................................10

Appendix A - For Each Street Segment in the Survey
Data Survey Sheet ..................................................................................................................

Radar Speed Distribution Sheet .............................................................................................

Appendix B – Certification
Radar Gun Certification .........................................................................................................

Technician Certification.........................................................................................................

207

208

1 CITY OF INDIAN WELLS

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS

Introduction

In accordance with procedures established by the State of California, this Engineering and Traffic Survey has been developed for the City of Indian Wells as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City. The work provided herein was authorized by the City and was performed by the engineering consulting firm of Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. The goal of the review was two-fold. The first was to review new roadway segments to determine if speed limit postings should be recommended. The second involved a determination as to whether changes in pre-existing conditions have occurred where older speed limits should be modified.

The requirement to perform Engineering and Traffic surveys for speed limits is based on the California Vehicle Code (CVC). CVC Section 40802 states that at least once every five (5), seven (7), or ten (10) years, States and local agencies should re-evaluate non-statuary speed limits on segments of their roadways. Recent changes to the CA MUTCD changed the policy and procedure for setting speed limits in California. Engineering and Traffic Surveys must be performed with the use of radar or other approved electronic devices if the use of radar is to be employed to enforce speed limits. If such a survey is not performed within five years (or seven years, or ten years as stated previously) of the date of the preceding survey, then the new data and its use will constitute a speed trap. Hence, evidence using such would not be admissible in court. From the Vehicle Code, a "speed trap" is either of the following:

(a) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

(b) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance under sub-paragraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established pursuant to Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3 if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

The definition of a Traffic and Engineering Survey is contained in Section 627 of the Vehicle Code and is as follows:

Engineering and Traffic survey, as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by State and local authorities. An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of the following:

(a) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (b) Accident records.
(c) Highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. 209

2 The California Vehicle code has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general understanding of the "Basic Speed Law", "Prima Facie Speed Limits" and "Intermediate Speed Zones".

Basic Speed Law (CVC 22350)

All fifty states base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California, CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as:

"No Person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property."

This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time-to-time and place-to-place and, therefore, no set of fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist will constantly adjust their driving behavior to fit the conditions encountered, and must learn to do this with a minimum of assistance from the police. The Basic Speed Law is founded on the belief that a majority of motorists are able to modify their driving behavior properly, as long as they are aware of the conditions around them.

Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352)

All other speed limits are prima facie limits which, "on the face of it", are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. The opportunity given to the driver to exceed a prima facie speed limit when it is safe to do so recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic, weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times.

Certain prima facie limits are automatically established by law (CVC 22352), including a 15 mph limit in alleys, blind intersections, blind railroad crossing, and the 25 mph limit in business and residence districts. There is also a part time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are present in route to or from school.

Business and residence districts are defined in the Vehicle Code as specific areas meeting a specified minimum density of roadside development. CVC Sections 235 and 515 define these regulations. A count of houses or active businesses facing on a highway must be made to determine whether or not a valid business or residence district exists. The law does not require posting these prima facie limits that are readily apparent.

Establishment of Speed Zones

The reason that speed limit areas and their required postings are done is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other similar laws, the limits identified are based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reasonable and safe. It is this type of information that is reflected in the analysis section of this report. Namely, posted speed limits are a reflection of 210

3 that speed which most people deem to be safe as opposed to a minority of drivers who do not drive in a reasonable manner.

Speed zones are also established to advise of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For that reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which considers the analytical data and accident history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit.

Data Collection Procedures

Speed evaluation data was collected at 17 different roadway segments on 11 different roadways in the City of Indian Wells. These areas and the number of segments on each are described as follows:

1. Cook Street (2) 7. Miles Avenue (1)

2. El Dorado Drive (2) 8. Portola Avenue (1)

3. Fairway Drive (2) 9. Rancho Palmeras Drive (1)

4. Fred Waring Drive (2) 10. Warner Trail (1)

5. Highway 111 (3) 11. Washington Street (s/b) (1)

6. Hovely Lane (1)

As described in various traffic engineering documents - including information provided by the State of California, the individual locations on which radar data collection procedures used involved considerations for the following:

a. Stop sign or traffic signal locations;
b. Visibility issues;
c. Traffic flow at intersections, cross-traffic, major driveways, crosswalks, railroad crossings and unusual turning movements;
d. The influence of other traffic factors on the speed of cars: such as on street parking, roadway features, adjacent land uses, and lighting.

Speed Zoning Methodology

The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, California Supplement (MUTCD CA Supplement) specifies a “short method of determining speed limits on City and County Through Highways, Arterial and Collector Roads Procedures.

Introduction - This short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that the reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorist speeds; one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include, but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.

211

4 Speed Zone Survey

- Only one person is required for the fieldwork. Speeds can be read directly from a radar speed meter.

- A section of road should be selected with representative operating speeds. If speeds vary on a given road, additional surveys should be conducted. In this case, it may be necessary to establish additional speed zones with different speed limits. The section selected should be straight and should have no traffic signal, stop sign or intersection with a major cross street.

- Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours on weekdays. The weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is important that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous as not to affect traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, with the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed so as to be able to survey traffic in both directions, and should not make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway center line.

- It is desirable to have a minimum sample of 100 automobiles in each survey. This may result in excessive survey periods for low-volume roads. Under these conditions, the survey should be conducted for a minimum of two hours, but in no case should the sample for any survey contain less than 50 automobiles.

- The MUTCD with California Supplement states that speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed can be selected directly from the data sheet. However, roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist or other roadway conditions that may impact sight distance may result in a further reduction of 5 mph in the recommended speed limit.

- As a check on the validity of the proposed speed limit, an analysis should be made of the three- year accident record for the section of roadway under consideration. If this record shows an abnormally high percentage of accidents normally associated with excessive speeds, the proposed speed limit should be further reduced. This is a judgement situation, and will not usually be a factor,

- Short speed zones of less than half a mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

- Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadway development.

- Speed zoning in 5 mile per hour increments should be avoided if possible. A 10-mile per hour increment is preferable.

- Speed zoning should be coordinated between adjacent jurisdictions.

212

5 Local Street Exemptions (CVC 40802)

Many streets are designated as "Local" streets per CVC 40802. These streets are exempt from the radar study. Therefore, the speed limit for these streets does not require an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The code is as follows:

"For the purpose of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and federal aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions:

1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

2. Not more than one half mile of uninterrupted length.

3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

Other Considerations

Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices, roadway alignment, width, surface conditions, accident history and any unique traffic hazards that may exist. Any of these conditions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning.

Radar Collection Time-Frames

The hours of radar operation were restricted to off-peak periods for heavily traveled streets and to uncongested peak periods on lightly traveled streets. All surveys were conducted in fair weather.

The radar unit was mounted at the top of the front dash of an unmarked vehicle with the meter- reading unit sustained inside the vehicle. The radar unit's calibration was checked periodically using a tuning fork.

The radar operator and assistant recorded the speed meter readings for each location on Radar Speed Survey Field Sheets included in the appendix of this report. A representative sampling of at least 100 vehicles were surveyed.

Analysis Factors

Several factors were used as input to our recommendations for speed limits. These include the 85th Percentile, the 10 MPH Pace and others. These are described in detail below.

1. The CRITICAL SPEED, or the 85th percentile, is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. From experience, traffic engineers have found that this is one of the most reliable factors in determining appropriate speed limits.

Hence, the accepted practice, and one that has been used in this case is to set the speed limit at or near the critical speed. This recognizes that other factors could be present where the above may not be appropriate. When this procedure is used, it not only conforms to that required by 213

6 the State but it also provides a strong base for law enforcement personnel to properly enforce speed limits.

2. The 10 MPH PACE is that continuous 10 mph incremental range of speeds in which the largest number of recorded vehicles is contained. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. For this element, the accepted practice to the greatest extent possible is to try and keep the recommended speed limit within the 10 mph pace after considering the critical speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the critical speed.

3. The MEDIAN (MIDDLE) SPEED, or 50th percentile speed, represents the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50% of the vehicles travel faster than, and 50% travel slower than the median speeds. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution.

4. The 15th PERCENTILE SPEED is that speed at or below which 15% of the vehicles are traveling. This value is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the vehicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the accident potential.

5. MODAL SPEED: The modal speed is the speed, which occurs most frequently in the distribution. It serves as another useful measure in verifying the correct recommendation for speed limits.

6. STANDARD DEVIATION: This is a mathematical element, which relates to measures of dispersion of data. It is used to assist in describing the center of speed distribution information around the arithmetic mean or the time mean speed. It also is used in the overall review of recommended speed limits and serves to verify the level of confidence of data used in making recommendations.

7. The MEAN (AVERAGE) is the sum of the speeds of the samples divided by the number of samples.

The numerical values of the above factors are derived from the speed distribution curves calculated for each survey location. These distribution curves represent a method of graphic analysis that compares the cumulative percentage of vehicles to the speed at which the vehicles are traveling.

Field Review

In addition to the availability of the above statistical data, a significant aspect of speed limit recommendations is based on the field review. Its importance is that existing conditions may warrant a lower speed than is actually indicated by the application of survey data. Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed limits are listed below:

1. Segment length, width and alignment

2. Level of pedestrian activity

3. Traffic flow characteristics
214

7 4. Vertical and/or horizontal curves.

5. Driver sight distance constraints.

6. Adjacent residential/commercial/industrial etc. zoning.

7. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors

8. Frequency of intersections, driveways and on street parking;

9. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices;

10. Roadway conditions, bumps and dips;

11. Obstructions to pedestrian visibility;

12. Land use and proximity of schools;

13. Uniformity and continuity with existing speed zones to/with adjacent jurisdictions;

14. Any other unusual conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The results of the field review of related road/traffic variables are summarized on the Engineering and Traffic Survey forms found in the Appendix of this report.

Accident History

The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available three-year accident information for the subject streets. The accident information includes the total number of accidents within each street segment and of those accidents, the number that are speed-related.

This information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the City of Indian Wells.

The annual accident rate figures represent the number of speed-related accidents divided by three years of accident records. The evaluation of accidents is useful as a check on the accuracy of recommended or existing speed limits. Should this review show a high percentage of accidents associated with excessive speeds, then consideration based on professional traffic engineering judgement should be directed toward reducing the posted or recommended speed limits.

Results and Recommendations

The following Summaries: No Speed Limit Changes, New Speed Limit Postings, Conflicting Speed Postings, Residence District, Speed Limit Increases, Speed Limit Reductions and Summary of Recommendations, present the results of the radar survey for the selected 17 locations. As shown, the Summary of Recommendations chart presents the necessary analysis elements that in addition to the field review of a registered traffic engineer led to the recommendations indicated.

Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes"

The Summary indicates that all of the 17 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes. The reason centers mostly on the fact that the newly measured values of the 85th percentile and the 10 MPH pace are still within the parameters of the existing speed limits. Additional factors such as reduced sight distance, higher collision rates and keeping continuity with the speeds of neighboring segments form the basis in some instances of our recommendation. Therefore, the current postings should remain as is. At one location, only one direction of travel is posted and is listed for no change in the speed limit. Hence, the other direction should be posted for consistency.

These segments noted as “post”, as well as the segments recommended for “No Change” are listed below:
215

8 Cook Street
Fairway Drive to Highway 111 Remain posted at 35 mph Highway 111 to Fred Waring Drive Remain posted at 40 mph

El Dorado Drive
Fairway Drive to Highway 111 Remain posted at 35 mph
Highway 111 to Fred Waring Drive Remain posted at 40 mph

Fairway Drive
Cook Street to Rancho Palmeras Drive Remain posted at 35 mph Rancho Palmeras Drive to El Dorado Drive Remain posted at 35 mph

Fred Waring Drive
Phyllis Jackson Lane to Cook Street Remain posted at 45mph Cook Street to Washington Street Remain posted at 50 mph

Highway 111
East City Limits to Club Drive Remain posted at 50 mph Club Drive to Cook Street Remain posted at 45 mph
Cook Street to West City Limits Remain posted at 45 mph

Hovley Lane
East City Limits to West City Limits Remain posted at 45 mph

Miles Avenue
Washington Street to Highway 111 Remain posted at 50 mph

Portola Avenue
Mockingbird Trail to Haystack Road Remain posted at 40 mph

Rancho Palmeras Drive
Fairway Drive to Highway 111 Remain posted at 35 mph

Warner Trail
Fred Waring Drive to Miles Avenue Remain posted at 35 mph

Washington Street (Southbound)
Fred Waring Drive to South City Limits Remain posted at 50 mph

Support Explanations of "No Speed Limit Changes"

The following are support explanations for the two roadway segments that the recommended speed limit is 5 mph lower or more than the newly measured 85th percentile speed and the one survey location with only one direction posted and recommended to install speed limit.

216

9 Cook Street

Highway 111 to Fred Waring Drive
This section of Cook Street is a four lane roadway with a 40 mph speed limit. Field observations include the adjacent land uses are residential golf communities and commercial, no parking anytime signs and bike lanes along both sides of the roadway, a 35 mph speed limit is posted in the adjacent southerly segment. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 46.2 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 38 to 47 mph. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limit between segments, it is recommended that the 40 mph speed limit remain.

El Dorado Drive

Highway 111 to Fred Waring Drive
This section of El Dorado Drive is a four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. The adjacent land uses are residential in a golf course community, fire station, and City Hall. Field observations include painted bike lanes, No Trucks over 3 tons 9pm-9am, no parking anytime along roadway, a gradual horizontal curve, and areas of limited sight distance. The Traffic Engineering speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 46.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 37 to 46 mph. With areas of limited sight distance and in effort of preventing a 10 mph jump in speed between segments, it is recommended that the existing speed limit remain.

Fairway Drive

Cook Street to Rancho Palmeras Drive
The recommended 35 mph speed is 3.4 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. Field observations include a 35 mph speed sign posted eastbound only, is a two lane roadway, land use is residential, no sidewalks thus pedestrians use roadway, painted bikes lanes and no stopping anytime eastbound. For enforcement, a 35 mph speed sign should be installed westbound.
217

10 CITY OF INDIAN WELLS

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED

AVERAGE
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE J U S T I F I C A T I O N / C O M M E N T S

COOK STREET

FAIRWAY DR TO
HIGHWAY 111 35 35 39.6 34.3 30-39 82.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE HIGHWAY 111 TO
FRED WARING DR 40 40 46.2 42.1 38-47 78.5 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / RETAIN 5 MPH SPEED JUMP

EL DORADO DRIVE

FAIRWAY DR TO
HIGHWAY 111 35 35 39.5 35.2 32-41 83.5 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE HIGHWAY 111 TO
FRED WARING DR 40 40 46.6 40.3 37-46 75.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / SIGHT DISTANCE / RETAIN 5 MPH SPEED JUMP

FAIRWAY DRIVE

COOK ST TO
RANCHO PALMERAS DR 35 EB 35 38.4 34.8 31-40 84.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE – POST WB

RANCHO PALMERAS DR TO
EL DORADO DR 35 35 37.3 34.1 30-39 89.8 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

FRED WARING DRIVE

PHYLLIS JACKSON LN TO
COOK ST 45 / 25* 45 / 25* 48.9 44.7 41-50 79.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

COOK ST TO
WASHINGTON ST 50 / 25* 50 / 25* 54.3 49.9 46-55 83.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE HIGHWAY 111

EAST CITY LIMITS TO
CLUB DR 50 50 50.4 45.2 42-51 71.4 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

CLUB DR TO
COOK ST 45 45 48.9 44.7 40-49 73.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

COOK ST TO
WEST CITY LIMITS 45 45 46.5 41.0 38-47 63.4 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

*25 mph When Children Present
NB = Northbound
SB = Southbound

EB = Eastbound
WB = Westbound

218

11 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED

AVERAGE
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE J U S T I F I C A T I O N / C O M M E N T S

HOVLEY LANE

EAST CITY LIMITS TO
WEST CITY LIMITS 45 45 49.9 45.0 42-51 79.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

MILES AVENUE

WASHINGTON ST TO
HIGHWAY 111 50 50 51.8 46.4 43-52 62.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

PORTOLA AVENUE

MOCKINGBIRD TRAIL TO
n/o OF HAYSTACK RD 40 40 41.6 37.4 34-43 78.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

RANCHO PALMERAS DR

FAIRWAY DR TO
HIGHWAY 111 35 35 35.9 32.8 29-38 90.4 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

WARNER TRAIL

FRED WARING DR TO
MILES AVE 35 / 25* 35 / 25* 38.3 33.2 29-38 73.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

WASHINGTON STREET (S/B)

FRED WARING DR TO
SOUTH CITY LIMITS 50 50 51.5 46.9 42-51 69.0 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

*25 mph When Children Present
NB = Northbound
NP = Not Posted
SB = Southbound

219

APPENDIX A

220

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
COOK STREET FAIRWAY DR TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C. BUENDIA
TIME:11:15 AM -11:15 AM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF FRED WARING

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 0
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION (1 LANE SB ONLY AT COVE GATE) TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HWY 111, STOP- FAIRWAY
CROSSWALKS AT HWY 111

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER DESIGNATED BIKE LANES

NO TRUCKS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO

STREET LIGHTING NONE

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL SEPERATED BY BRICK WALLS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Cook-01 2022
The recommended speed of 35 mph is within 4.6 of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.45 3,750

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/27/2022
HCI
221

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
COOK STREET FAIRWAY DR TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C. BUENDIA
TIME:11:15 AM -11:15 AM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 100.0%48 X 100.0%47 X 100.0%46 X 100.0%45 X 98.5%44 X 97.0%43 X 95.0%42 X 92.0%41 X 89.1%40 X 86.6%39 X 83.1%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT38X77.6%}PACE37X72.1%}PACE36X65.2%}PACE35X57.7%}PACE34X46.3%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN33X36.8%}PACE32X29.4%}PACE31X23.4%}PACE30X18.9%}PACE29X1.0%- - - - - -15PCT28X0.5%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:16.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:34.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:82.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:29.8 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:1.0 %
Cook-01 2022
HCI
222

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
COOK STREET FAIRWAY DR TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C. BUENDIA
TIME:11:15 AM -11:15 AM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%50 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%X X X 3 1.5%100.0%45 X X X 3 1.5%98.5%X X X X 4 2.0%97.0%X X X X X X 6 3.0%95.0%X X X X X X 6 3.0%92.0%X X X X X 5 2.5%89.1%40 X X X X X X X 7 3.5%86.6%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5%83.1%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5%77.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.0%72.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5%65.2%35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 11.4%57.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.5%46.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5%36.8%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.0%29.4%X X X X X X X X X 9 4.5%23.4%30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 36 17.9%18.9%X 1 0.5%1.0%X 1 0.5%0.5%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 201 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:16.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:34.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:82.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:29.8 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:1.0 %
Cook-01 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
223

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
COOK STREET HIGHWAY 111 TO FRED WARING DR
DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C. BUENDIA
TIME:10:30 AM -11:10 AM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CACHUMA DR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 5
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - FRED WARING / CACHUMA-DESERT HORIZON / HWY 111 CROSSWALKS AT FRED WARING / CACHUMA-DESERT HORIZON / HWY 111

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER DESIGNED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (NB) - NO / NO (SB)

STREET LIGHTING NONE

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERIAL / RESIDENTIAL GOLF COURSE COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Cook-02 2022
This section of Cook Street is a four lane roadway with a 40 mph speed limit. Field observations include the adjacent land uses are residential golf communities and commercial,no parking anytime signs and bike lanes along both sides of the roadway, a 35 mph speed limit is posted in the adjacent southerly segment. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 46.2 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 38 to 47 mph.To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limit between segments, it is recommended that the 40 mph speed limit remain.

0.52 14,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
01/272022
HCI
224

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
COOK STREET HIGHWAY 111 TO FRED WARING DR
DATE:01/272022 SURVEY BY:C. BUENDIA
TIME:10:30 AM -11:10 AM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 97.5%48 X 94.9%47 X 89.2%}PACE46X84.2%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT45X77.8%}PACE44X69.6%}PACE43X60.1%}PACE42X49.4%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN41X39.9%}PACE40X33.5%}PACE39X23.4%}PACE38X17.1%}PACE37X10.8%- - - - - -15PCT36X7.6%35 X 5.1%34 X 3.2%33 X 2.5%32 X 1.9%31 X 0.6%30 X 0.6%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.8 %MEDIAN SPEED:42.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:78.5 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:37.7 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:10.8 %
Cook-02 2022
HCI
225

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
COOK STREET HIGHWAY 111 TO FRED WARING DR
DATE:01/272022 SURVEY BY:C. BUENDIA
TIME:10:30 AM -11:10 AM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%50 X X X X 4 2.5%100.0%X X X X 4 2.5%97.5%X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7%94.9%X X X X X X X X 8 5.1%89.2%X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3%84.2%45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.2%77.8%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5%69.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.8%60.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.5%49.4%X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3%39.9%40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1%33.5%X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3%23.4%X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3%17.1%X X X X X 5 3.2%10.8%X X X X 4 2.5%7.6%35 X X X 3 1.9%5.1%X 1 0.6%3.2%X 1 0.6%2.5%X X 2 1.3%1.9%0 0.0%0.6%30 X 1 0.6%0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 158 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.8 %MEDIAN SPEED:42.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:78.5 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:37.7 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:10.8 %
Cook-02 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
226

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
EL DORADO DRIVE FAIRWAY DR TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:2:00 PM -2:30 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF HWY 111

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES (Hwy 111-Altamira), 1 LANE (to Fairway) TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HWY 111, STOP - FAIRWAY
CROSSWALKS HWY 111

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER DESIGNATED BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / FEW

STREET LIGHTING NO

DRIVEWAY DENSITY MEDIUM

OTHER PARTIAL SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINES & RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (fronting & non-fronting) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:El Dorado-03 2022
The recommended speed 35 mph speed limit is within 4.5 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.48 2,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
227

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
EL DORADO DRIVE FAIRWAY DR TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:2:00 PM -2:30 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 100.0%48 X 100.0%47 X 100.0%46 X 100.0%45 X 100.0%44 X 99.2%43 X 99.2%42 X 98.3%41 X 95.0%}PACE40X90.1%}PACE39X80.2%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT38X74.4%}PACE37X65.3%}PACE36X57.9%}PACE35X47.9%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN34X34.7%}PACE33X26.4%}PACE32X19.8%}PACE31X11.6%- - - - - -15PCT30X6.6%29 X 3.3%28 X 1.7%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:9.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:35.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:83.5 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:31.4 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:11.6 %
El Dorado-03 2022
HCI
228

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
EL DORADO DRIVE FAIRWAY DR TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:2:00 PM -2:30 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLESSPEED51015 20 25 VEH.PCT.60
55 50
45 X 1 0.8%0 0.0%X 1 0.8%X X X X 4 3.3%X X X X X X 6 5.0%40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.9%X X X X X X X 7 5.8%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.1%X X X X X X X X X 9 7.4%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.9%35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 13.2%X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3%X X X X X X X X 8 6.6%X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.3%X X X X X X 6 5.0%30 X X X X 4 3.3%X X 2 1.7%X X 2 1.7% 25 20
15 TOTAL VEHICLES 121
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.5 PERCENT OVER PACE:9.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:35.2
PERCENT IN PACE:83.5 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:31.4
PERCENT UNDER PACE:11.6 %
El Dorado-03 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
229

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
EL DORADO DRIVE HIGHWAY 111 TO FRED WARING DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:2:30 PM -3:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF FRED WARING

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 37 - 46 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 75.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HWY 111 / FRED WARING
CROSSWALKS AT HWY 111 / FRED WARING

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC FEW

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME
OTHER NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS, 9pm-9am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVE NORTH OF DESERT HORIZON LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / FEW (NB), PARTIAL / FEW (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

DRIVEWAY DENSITY LIGHT

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / DBL DBL SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) GOLF COMMUNITES / FIRE STATION / CITY HALL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:El Dorado-04 2022
This section of El Dorado Drive is a four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 40 mph.The adjacent land uses are residential in a golf course community, fire station,and City Hall. Field observations include pained bike lanes, No Trucks over 3 tons 9pm-9am, no parking anytime along the roadway, a gradual horizontal curve,and areas of limited sight distance. The Traffic Engineering speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 46.6 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 37 to 46 mph.With areas of limited sight distance and in effort of preventing a 10 mph jump in speed between segments, it is recommended that the existing speed limit remain.

0.53 4,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
230

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
EL DORADO DRIVE HIGHWAY 111 TO FRED WARING DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:2:30 PM -3:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 99.2%49 X 95.5%48 X 91.7%47 X 86.4%46 X 83.3%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT45X77.3%}PACE44X72.0%}PACE43X66.7%}PACE42X59.1%}PACE41X58.3%}PACE40X47.0%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN39X32.6%}PACE38X23.5%}PACE37X14.4%}PACE- - - - - -15PCT36X7.6%35 X 4.5%34 X 1.5%33 X 0.0%32 X 0.0%31 X 0.0%30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:16.7 %MEDIAN SPEED:40.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:75.8 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:37.1 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:7.6 %
El Dorado-04 2022
HCI
231

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
EL DORADO DRIVE HIGHWAY 111 TO FRED WARING DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:2:30 PM -3:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.8%100.0%50 X X X X X 5 3.8%99.2%X X X X X 5 3.8%95.5%X X X X X X X 7 5.3%91.7%X X X X 4 3.0%86.4%X X X X X X X X 8 6.1%83.3%45 X X X X X X X 7 5.3%77.3%X X X X X X X 7 5.3%72.0%X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.6%66.7%X 1 0.8%59.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.4%58.3%40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 14.4%47.0%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.1%32.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.1%23.5%X X X X X X X X X 9 6.8%14.4%X X X X 4 3.0%7.6%35 X X X X 4 3.0%4.5%X X 2 1.5%1.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 132 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:46 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:37 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:16.7 %MEDIAN SPEED:40.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:75.8 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:37.1 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:7.6 %
El Dorado-04 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
232

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FAIRWAY DRIVE COOK ST TO RANCHO PALMERAS DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:11:40 AM -12:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF COOK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 84.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH EB

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - COOK / RANCHO PALMERAS

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NONE

ON-STREET PARKING YES (WB) / NO STOPPING ANYTIME (EB)

OTHER DESIGNATED BIKE LANES

NO TRUCKS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVE (east of Cook)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / NO (EB) - NO / FEW (WB)

STREET LIGHTING NONE

DRIVEWAY DENSITY LIGHT (WB)

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / GREENBELT (EB)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST WESTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

F+NF = Fronting + Non-Fronting to the Roadway File:Fairway-05 2022 The recommended 35 mph speed is 3.4 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. Field observations include a 35 mph speed sign posted westbound only,is a two lane roadway, land use is residential,no sidewalks thus pedestrians use roadway, painted bikes lanes and no stopping anytime eastbound. For enforcement, a 35 mph speed sign should be installed westbound.

0.52 3,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
233

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FAIRWAY DRIVE COOK ST TO RANCHO PALMERAS DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:11:40 AM -12:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 100.0%48 X 100.0%47 X 100.0%46 X 100.0%45 X 99.3%44 X 99.3%43 X 98.0%42 X 97.4%41 X 94.7%40 X 90.8%}PACE39X87.5%}PACE38X83.6%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT37X77.0%}PACE36X67.8%}PACE35X53.3%}PACE34X40.1%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN33X28.3%}PACE32X19.1%}PACE31X11.2%}PACE- - - - - -15PCT30X6.6%29 X 3.3%28 X 1.3%27 X 0.7%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:38.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:12.5 %MEDIAN SPEED:34.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:84.2 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:31.5 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:6.6 %
Fairway-05 2022
HCI
234

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FAIRWAY DRIVE COOK ST TO RANCHO PALMERAS DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:11:40 AM -12:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%50 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.7%100.0%45 0 0.0%99.3%X X 2 1.3%99.3%X 1 0.7%98.0%X X X X 4 2.6%97.4%X X X X X X 6 3.9%94.7%40 X X X X X 5 3.3%90.8%X X X X X X 6 3.9%87.5%X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.6%83.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.2%77.0%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 14.5%67.8%35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 13.2%53.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.8%40.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.2%28.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.9%19.1%X X X X X X X 7 4.6%11.2%30 X X X X X 5 3.3%6.6%X X X 3 2.0%3.3%X 1 0.7%1.3%X 1 0.7%0.7%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 152 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:38.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:12.5 %MEDIAN SPEED:34.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:84.2 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:31.5 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:6.6 %

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
235

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FAIRWAY DRIVE RANCHO PALMERAS DR TO EL DORADO DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:1:00 PM -1:30 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF EL DORADO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 89.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - RANCHO PALMERAS / EL DORADO

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER DESIGNATED BIKE LANES
NO STOPPING 4-7am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT CURVE AT EL DORADO

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / YES (WB) - NO /NO (EB)

STREET LIGHTING ONE AT EAST END

DRIVEWAY DENSITY MEDIUM (WB)
OTHER RADAR FEEDBACK (at Williams)

SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF) / GREENBELT (EB)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F+NF = Fronting + Non-Fronting to the Roadway File:Fairway-06 2022 The recommended speed is within 2.3 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.51 3,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
236

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FAIRWAY DRIVE RANCHO PALMERAS DR TO EL DORADO DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:1:00 PM -1:30 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 100.0%48 X 100.0%47 X 100.0%46 X 100.0%45 X 100.0%44 X 100.0%43 X 100.0%42 X 100.0%41 X 99.2%40 X 97.5%39 X 94.9%}PACE38X90.7%}PACE37X83.1%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT36X74.6%}PACE35X63.6%}PACE34X48.3%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN33X35.6%}PACE32X22.9%}PACE31X13.6%}PACE- - - - - -15PCT30X8.5%}PACE29X5.1%28 X 1.7%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:37.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:5.1 %MEDIAN SPEED:34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:89.8 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:31.2 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:5.1 %
Fairway-06 2022
HCI
237

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FAIRWAY DRIVE RANCHO PALMERAS DR TO EL DORADO DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:1:00 PM -1:30 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%50 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%45 100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.8%100.0%X X 2 1.7%99.2%40 X X X 3 2.5%97.5%X X X X X 5 4.2%94.9%X X X X X X X X X 9 7.6%90.7%X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.5%83.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.0%74.6%35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 15.3%63.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.7%48.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.7%35.6%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9.3%22.9%X X X X X X 6 5.1%13.6%30 X X X X 4 3.4%8.5%X X X X 4 3.4%5.1%X X 2 1.7%1.7%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 118 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:37.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:5.1 %MEDIAN SPEED:34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:89.8 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:31.2 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:5.1 %

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
238

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FRED WARING DRIVE PHYLLIS JACKSON LN TO COOK ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:3:10 PM -3:35 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COOK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 41 - 50 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH / 25 MPH*

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 0
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 1
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COOK / PHYLLIS JACKSON

CROSSWALKS AT COOK (SCH) / PHYLLIS JACKSON (SCH)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER BUS STOP
NO TRUCKS OVER 8 TONS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (non-fronting)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Fred Waring-07 2022
The recommended speed is within 3.9 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.26 31,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
239

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FRED WARING DRIVE PHYLLIS JACKSON LN TO COOK ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:3:10 PM -3:35 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 99.5%54 X 99.0%53 X 97.0%52 X 96.0%51 X 92.6%50 X 89.6%}PACE49X85.6%}PACE48X81.2%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT47X74.3%}PACE46X64.9%}PACE45X53.5%}PACE44X41.6%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN43X31.7%}PACE42X24.3%}PACE41X14.9%}PACE- - - - - -15PCT40X10.4%39 X 6.9%38 X 5.0%37 X 2.5%36 X 1.0%35 X 0.5%34 X 0.0%33 X 0.0%32 X 0.0%31 X 0.0%30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:48.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.4 %MEDIAN SPEED:44.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:79.2 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.0 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:10.4 %
Fred Waring-07 2022
HCI
240

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FRED WARING DRIVE PHYLLIS JACKSON LN TO COOK ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:3:10 PM -3:35 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.5%100.0%55 X 1 0.5%99.5%X X X X 4 2.0%99.0%X X 2 1.0%97.0%X X X X X X X 7 3.5%96.0%X X X X X X 6 3.0%92.6%50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.0%89.6%X X X X X X X X X 9 4.5%85.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.9%81.2%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.4%74.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 11.4%64.9%45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 11.9%53.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.9%41.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.4%31.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.4%24.3%X X X X X X X X X 9 4.5%14.9%40 X X X X X X X 7 3.5%10.4%X X X X 4 2.0%6.9%X X X X X 5 2.5%5.0%X X X 3 1.5%2.5%X 1 0.5%1.0%35 X 1 0.5%0.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 202 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:50 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:41 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:48.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.4 %MEDIAN SPEED:44.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:79.2 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.0 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:10.4 %
Fred Waring-07 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
241

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FRED WARING DRIVE COOK ST TO WASHINGTON ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:3:35 PM -4:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF WARNER TRAIL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 54.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 46 - 55 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH / 25 MPH*

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 13
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 27
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 4.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.14 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL-COOK / EL DORADO/ CALIF/ WARNER TRAIL / SW CHURCH/ WASHINGTON CROSSWALKS AT COOK / EL DORADO/ CALIF/ WARNER TRAIL (sch) / SW CHURCH/ WASHINGTON

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES NO / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO STOPPING ANYTIME
OTHER RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK (east of Tennesee)

BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP/DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO (WB) - PARTIAL / ONE (near Washington)

STREET LIGHTING YES

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) COMMUNITES w/GOLF COURSES / SCHOOL / CHURCH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Fred Waring-08 2022
The recommended speed is within 4.3 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

3.02 28,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
242

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FRED WARING DRIVE COOK ST TO WASHINGTON ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:3:35 PM -4:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 99.1%58 X 98.6%57 X 95.9%56 X 93.7%55 X 89.1%}PACE54X83.3%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT53X78.3%}PACE52X70.6%}PACE51X63.3%}PACE50X51.1%}PACE49X35.7%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN48X23.5%}PACE47X16.3%}PACE46X10.9%}PACE- - - - - -15PCT45X5.4%44 X 2.3%43 X 0.5%42 X 0.0%41 X 0.0%40 X 0.0%39 X 0.0%38 X 0.0%37 X 0.0%36 X 0.0%35 X 0.0%34 X 0.0%33 X 0.0%32 X 0.0%31 X 0.0%30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:54.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:49.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:83.7 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.8 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:5.4 %
Fred Waring-08 2022
HCI
243

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

FRED WARING DRIVE COOK ST TO WASHINGTON ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:3:35 PM -4:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 X X 2 0.9%100.0%X 1 0.5%99.1%X X X X X X 6 2.7%98.6%X X X X X 5 2.3%95.9%X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.5%93.7%55 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.9%89.1%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0%83.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.7%78.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.2%70.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 27 12.2%63.3%50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 34 15.4%51.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 27 12.2%35.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.2%23.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.4%16.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.4%10.9%45 X X X X X X X 7 3.2%5.4%X X X X 4 1.8%2.3%X 1 0.5%0.5%0.0%0.0%40 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%35 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 221 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:55 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:46 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:54.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:49.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:83.7 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.8 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:5.4 %
Fred Waring-08 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
244

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 EAST CITY LIMITS TO CLUB DR
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:1:00 PM -1:30 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF MILES

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 50.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 71.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 3
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 9
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.05 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CLUB / MILES / MOUNTAIN COVE

CROSSWALKS AT CLUB / MILES / MOUNTAIN COVE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES / YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER DESIGNATED BIKE LANES
BUS STOPS / SHARE THE ROAD?

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO (EB) - PARTIAL / NO (WB)

STREET LIGHTING NONE

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER PARTIAL PAINTED AND RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (non-fronting) / OPEN
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Hwy 111-09 2022
The recommended 50 mph is 0.4 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

1.69 32,650

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
245

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 EAST CITY LIMITS TO CLUB DR
DATE: 1/26/2022 SURVEY BY: C BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM -1:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED 20 40 60 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 99.5%55 X 98.5%54 X 96.9%53 X 94.9%52 X 92.3%51 X 88.3%}PACE50X82.7%}PACE - - -85PCT49X76.5%}PACE48X70.9%}PACE47X63.3%}PACE46X55.6%}PACE45X48.5%}PACE - - -MEAN44X35.7%}PACE43X27.0%}PACE42X22.4%}PACE41X16.8%40 X 13.8% - - -15PCT39X8.2%38 X 5.6%37 X 3.1%36 X 2.6%35 X 1.5%34 X 0.0%33 X 0.0%32 X 0.0%31 X 0.0% HCI
30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 45.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
Hwy 111-09 2022
246

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 EAST CITY LIMITS TO CLUB DR
DATE: 1/26/2022 SURVEY BY: C BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM -1:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.5% 100.0%X X 2 1.0% 99.5%55 X X X 3 1.5% 98.5%X X X X 4 2.0% 96.9%X X X X X 5 2.6% 94.9%X X X X X X X X 8 4.1% 92.3%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 88.3%50 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.1% 82.7%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 76.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 70.9%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.7% 63.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.1% 55.6%45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 12.8% 48.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.7% 35.7%X X X X X X X X X 9 4.6% 27.0%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 22.4%X X X X X X 6 3.1% 16.8%40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.6% 13.8%X X X X X 5 2.6% 8.2%X X X X X 5 2.6% 5.6%X 1 0.5% 3.1%X X 2 1.0% 2.6%35 X X X 3 1.5% 1.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 196 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 50.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 45.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 71.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 40.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.8 %
Hwy 111-09 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEETHCI
247

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 CLUB DR TO COOK ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY: C BUENDIA
TIME:12:15 PM -12:50 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF CAMINO DE DORADO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 48.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 40 - 49 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 29
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 46
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 9.67 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.45 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - COOK / PROVINCE / R. PALMERAS / EL DORADO / INDIAN WELLS /CLUB CROSSWALKS AT COOK / PROVINCE / R. PALMERAS / EL DORADO / INDIAN WELLS /CLUB

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER PAIANTED BIKE LANES

BUS STOPS / SHARE THE ROAD SIGN

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING FEW

DRIVEWAY DENSITY LIGHT

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE GOLF COURSES / CITY HALL / RESIDENTIAL (non-fronting) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Highway 111-10 2022
The recommended 45 mph is 3.9 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

1.70 34,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
248

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 CLUB DR TO COOK ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY: C BUENDIA
TIME:12:15 PM -12:50 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 98.9%54 X 95.7%53 X 94.1%52 X 91.9%51 X 90.3%50 X 88.2%49 X 85.5%}PACE48X81.2%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT47X76.3%}PACE46X70.4%}PACE45X53.8%}PACE44X40.9%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN43X34.9%}PACE42X27.4%}PACE41X20.4%}PACE40X17.7%}PACE39X12.4%- - - - - -15PCT38X8.6%37 X 7.0%36 X 5.4%35 X 3.8%34 X 2.2%33 X 1.6%32 X 0.5%31 X 0.0%30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:48.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:14.5 %MEDIAN SPEED:44.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:73.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.5 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:12.4 %
Highway 111-10 2022
HCI
249

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 CLUB DR TO COOK ST
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY: C BUENDIA
TIME:12:15 PM -12:50 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%X X 2 1.1%100.0%55 X X X X X X 6 3.2%98.9%X X X 3 1.6%95.7%X X X X 4 2.2%94.1%X X X 3 1.6%91.9%X X X X 4 2.2%90.3%50 X X X X X 5 2.7%88.2%X X X X X X X X 8 4.3%85.5%X X X X X X X X X 9 4.8%81.2%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.9%76.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 31 16.7%70.4%45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 12.9%53.8%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.9%40.9%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.5%34.9%X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.0%27.4%X X X X X 5 2.7%20.4%40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.4%17.7%X X X X X X X 7 3.8%12.4%X X X 3 1.6%8.6%X X X 3 1.6%7.0%X X X 3 1.6%5.4%35 X X X 3 1.6%3.8%X 1 0.5%2.2%X X 2 1.1%1.6%X 1 0.5%0.5%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 186 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:49 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:40 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:48.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:14.5 %MEDIAN SPEED:44.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:73.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.5 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:12.4 %
Highway 111-10 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
250

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 COOK ST TO WEST CITY LIMITS (340' e/o Hospitality) DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:11:30 AM -12:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF COOK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 46.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 38 - 47 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 63.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 10
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 18
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 3.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 1.01 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - VILLAGE CENTER / COOK

CROSSWALKS AT VILLAGE CENTER / COOK

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER PAINTED BIKE LANES

BUS STOPS / CUT OUT (EB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING NONE
DRIVEWAY DENSITY LIGHT.

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND / PAINTED ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE COMMERCIAL
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Highway 111-11 2022
The recommended speed is within 1.5 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.26 34,750

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
251

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 COOK ST TO WEST CITY LIMITS (340' e/o Hospitality) DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:11:30 AM -12:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 99.4%50 X 98.3%49 X 93.6%48 X 91.3%47 X 87.8%}PACE46X82.6%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT45X76.7%}PACE44X72.1%}PACE43X64.5%}PACE42X57.0%}PACE41X50.0%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN40X41.9%}PACE39X34.9%}PACE38X29.1%}PACE37X24.4%36 X 19.8%35 X 17.4%34 X 12.8%- - - - - -15PCT33X10.5%32 X 7.6%31 X 4.7%30 X 4.1%29 X 1.7%28 X 1.2%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:12.2 %MEDIAN SPEED:41.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:63.4 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:34.5 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:24.4 %
Highway 111-11 2022
HCI
252

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
HIGHWAY 111 COOK ST TO WEST CITY LIMITS (340' e/o Hospitality) DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:11:30 AM -12:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.6%100.0%X X 2 1.2%99.4%50 X X X X X X X X 8 4.7%98.3%X X X X 4 2.3%93.6%X X X X X X 6 3.5%91.3%X X X X X X X X X 9 5.2%87.8%X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.8%82.6%45 X X X X X X X X 8 4.7%76.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.6%72.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.6%64.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.0%57.0%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.1%50.0%40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.0%41.9%X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.8%34.9%X X X X X X X X 8 4.7%29.1%X X X X X X X X 8 4.7%24.4%X X X X 4 2.3%19.8%35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.7%17.4%X X X X 4 2.3%12.8%X X X X X 5 2.9%10.5%X X X X X 5 2.9%7.6%X 1 0.6%4.7%30 X X X X 4 2.3%4.1%X 1 0.6%1.7%X X 2 1.2%1.2%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 172 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:47 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:46.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:12.2 %MEDIAN SPEED:41.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:63.4 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:34.5 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:24.4 %
Highway 111-11 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
253

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

HOVLEY LANE EAST CITY LIMITS TO WEST CITY LIMITS
DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:12:10 PM -12:40 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST IF WATER WAY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 49.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - EL DORADO-VIA TOSCANO

CROSSWALKS AT EL DORADO-VIA TOSCANO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

BIKE LANES / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP- DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING NO

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (non-fronting)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

Note: 45 mph speed limit in westerly neighboring City of Palm Desert File:Hovley-12 2022 The recommended speed 45 mph is within 4.9 mph of the 85th percentile speed of 49.9 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.93 15,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/27/2022
HCI
254

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

HOVLEY LANE EAST CITY LIMITS TO WEST CITY LIMITS
DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:12:10 PM -12:40 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 99.5%55 X 98.5%54 X 96.6%53 X 94.7%52 X 92.2%51 X 89.8%}PACE50X85.4%}PACE49X81.6%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT48X75.7%}PACE47X67.5%}PACE46X60.2%}PACE45X50.5%}PACE44X36.9%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN43X24.8%}PACE42X17.5%}PACE41X10.7%- - - - - -15PCT40X7.3%39 X 4.4%38 X 2.4%37 X 1.0%36 X 0.0%35 X 0.0%34 X 0.0%33 X 0.0%32 X 0.0%31 X 0.0%30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:49.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.2 %MEDIAN SPEED:45.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:79.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.6 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:10.7 %
Hovley-12 2022
HCI
255

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

HOVLEY LANE EAST CITY LIMITS TO WEST CITY LIMITS
DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:12:10 PM -12:40 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.5%100.0%X X 2 1.0%99.5%55 X X X X 4 1.9%98.5%X X X X 4 1.9%96.6%X X X X X 5 2.4%94.7%X X X X X 5 2.4%92.2%X X X X X X X X X 9 4.4%89.8%50 X X X X X X X X 8 3.9%85.4%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.8%81.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.3%75.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.3%67.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.7%60.2%45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 28 13.6%50.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 12.1%36.9%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.3%24.8%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6.8%17.5%X X X X X X X 7 3.4%10.7%40 X X X X X X 6 2.9%7.3%X X X X 4 1.9%4.4%X X X 3 1.5%2.4%X X 2 1.0%1.0%0.0%35 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 206 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:49.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:10.2 %MEDIAN SPEED:45.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:79.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.6 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:10.7 %
Hovley-12 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
256

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
MILES AVENUE WASHINGTON ST TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:2:00 PM -2:35 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF WASHINGTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 43 - 52 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 62.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH
35 MPH (Advisory at Curve)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - WASHINGTON / WARNER TRAIL / HWY 111 CROSSWALKS AT WASHINGTON / WARNER TRAIL / HWY 111

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME
OTHER NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS 9pm-9am

BIKE LANES

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SWEEPING "C" CURVE (N/O Hwy 111)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / MINIMAL

STREET LIGHTING NONE

DRIVEWAY DENSITY LIGHT

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND & PAINTED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (non-fronting) / PARK / INDIAN WELLS TENNIS GARDENS / OPEN RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Miles-13 2022
The recommended speed is 1.8 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

1.27 5,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
257

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
MILES AVENUE WASHINGTON ST TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:2:00 PM -2:35 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 X X X 3 1.9%100.0%X 1 0.6%98.1%0 0.0%97.5%X X 2 1.3%97.5%X X 2 1.3%96.2%55 X X X X X X 6 3.8%94.9%X X X X 4 2.5%91.1%X X X X 4 2.5%88.6%X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3%86.1%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.0%79.7%50 X X X X 4 2.5%72.8%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1%70.3%X X X X X X X 7 4.4%60.1%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1%55.7%X X X X X X X X 8 5.1%45.6%45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.1%40.5%X X X X X 5 3.2%30.4%X X X X X X 6 3.8%27.2%X X X X X X 6 3.8%23.4%X X X X 4 2.5%19.6%40 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7%17.1%X X 2 1.3%11.4%X X X X X X X 7 4.4%10.1%X 1 0.6%5.7%X 1 0.6%5.1%35 X X X 3 1.9%4.4%X X 2 1.3%2.5%0 0.0%1.3%X X 2 1.3%1.3%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 158 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:51.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:13.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:46.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:62.7 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.6 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:23.4 %
Miles-13 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
258

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
MILES AVENUE WASHINGTON ST TO HIGHWAY 111
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:2:00 PM -2:35 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 98.1%58 X 97.5%57 X 97.5%56 X 96.2%55 X 94.9%54 X 91.1%53 X 88.6%52 X 86.1%}PACE51X79.7%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT50X72.8%}PACE49X70.3%}PACE48X60.1%}PACE47X55.7%}PACE46X45.6%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN45X40.5%}PACE44X30.4%}PACE43X27.2%}PACE42X23.4%41 X 19.6%40 X 17.1%39 X 11.4%- - - - - -15PCT38X10.1%37 X 5.7%36 X 5.1%35 X 4.4%34 X 2.5%33 X 1.3%32 X 1.3%31 X 0.0%30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:52 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:43 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:51.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:13.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:46.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:62.7 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:39.6 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:23.4 %
Miles-13 2022
HCI
259

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
PORTOLA AVENUE MOCKINGBIRD TRAIL TO SCL (n/o HAYSTACK RD) DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:3:30 PM -4:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF MOCKINGBIRD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - GRAPEVINE / MARRAKESH COUNTRY CLUB

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER BIKE LANE / GOLF CART LANE

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL (SB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVE (Near Haystack)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NO (SB) - NO / NO (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE GOLF COURSE / RESIDENTIAL (on golf course) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Portola-14 2022
The recommended 40 mph speed limit is 1.6 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.51 9,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
260

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
PORTOLA AVENUE MOCKINGBIRD TRAIL TO SCL (n/o HAYSTACK RD) DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:3:30 PM -4:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%50 100.0%100.0%100.0%X 1 0.7%100.0%X 1 0.7%99.3%45 X X X X 4 2.6%98.7%X X X X X X 6 3.9%96.1%X X X X X X X X 8 5.3%92.1%X X X X X X X 7 4.6%86.8%X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.6%82.2%40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.5%73.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.9%63.2%X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9%53.3%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.9%47.4%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.9%37.5%35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.9%29.6%X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9%19.7%X X X X X X 6 3.9%13.8%X X X X X X 6 3.9%9.9%X X X X 4 2.6%5.9%30 X X X X 4 2.6%3.3%0 0.0%0.7%X 1 0.7%0.7%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 152 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:7.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:37.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:78.3 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:33.2 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:13.8 %
Portola-14 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
261

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
PORTOLA AVENUE MOCKINGBIRD TRAIL TO SCL (n/o HAYSTACK RD) DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:3:30 PM -4:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 100.0%48 X 100.0%47 X 100.0%46 X 99.3%45 X 98.7%44 X 96.1%43 X 92.1%}PACE42X86.8%}PACE41X82.2%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT40X73.7%}PACE39X63.2%}PACE38X53.3%}PACE37X47.4%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN36X37.5%}PACE35X29.6%}PACE34X19.7%}PACE33X13.8%- - - - - -15PCT32X9.9%31 X 5.9%30 X 3.3%29 X 0.7%28 X 0.7%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:7.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:37.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:78.3 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:33.2 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:13.8 %
Portola-14 2022
HCI
262

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
RANCHO PALMERAS HIGHWAY 111 TO FAIRWAY DRIVE
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:12:15 PM -1:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF DESERT PARK

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 35.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 90.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HWY 111, STOP - FAIRWAY
CROSSWALKS AT HWY 111

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO (DELIVERY TRUCKS ONLY)

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER BIKE LANE ROUTE

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS NO / YES

STREET LIGHTING NO

DRIVEWAY DENSITY MEDIUM

OTHER PARTIAL SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLANE & RAISED MEDIAN ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (fronting & non-fronting) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Rancho Palmeras-15 2022
The recommended speed 35 mph speed limit is 0.9 mph below the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 1,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/26/2022
HCI
263

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
RANCHO PALMERAS HIGHWAY 111 TO FAIRWAY DRIVE
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:12:15 PM -1:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%50 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%45 100.0%X 1 0.9%100.0%X 1 0.9%99.1%0 0.0%98.2%X X 2 1.8%98.2%40 X 1 0.9%96.5%X 1 0.9%95.6%X X X X 4 3.5%94.7%X X X X X X 6 5.3%91.2%X X X X X X X X 8 7.0%86.0%35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.3%78.9%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.2%66.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 14.0%53.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.3%39.5%X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9%27.2%30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.4%19.3%X X X X 4 3.5%7.9%X X X X 4 3.5%4.4%X 1 0.9%0.9%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 114 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:35.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:8.8 %MEDIAN SPEED:32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:90.4 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:29.6 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:4.4 %
Rancho Palmeras-15 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
264

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S
RANCHO PALMERAS HIGHWAY 111 TO FAIRWAY DRIVE
DATE:1/26/2022 SURVEY BY:E. BUENDIA
TIME:12:15 PM -1:00 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 100.0%48 X 100.0%47 X 100.0%46 X 100.0%45 X 100.0%44 X 100.0%43 X 99.1%42 X 98.2%41 X 98.2%40 X 96.5%39 X 95.6%38 X 94.7%}PACE37X91.2%}PACE36X86.0%}PACE35X78.9%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT34X66.7%}PACE33X53.5%}PACE32X39.5%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN31X27.2%}PACE30X19.3%}PACE29X7.9%}PACE- - - - - -15PCT28X4.4%27 X 0.9%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:35.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:8.8 %MEDIAN SPEED:32.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:90.4 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:29.6 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:4.4 %
Rancho Palmeras-15 2022
HCI
265

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

WARNER TRAIL FRED WARING DR TO MILES AVE
DATE:11/3/2011 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:1:25 PM -3:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF BLACKFOOT

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 73.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH / 25 MPH* (Flashing Beacon)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MILES / FRED WARING
CROSSWALKS AT FRED WARING (sch) / EVENING STAR (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES, NO PARKING ANYTIME (SB)

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL (NB)

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW (NB) - PARTIAL / YES (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

DRIVEWAY DENSITY MEDIUM

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

NO EVENT PARKING
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (Fronting) / TENNIS GARDENS / CHURCH / SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Warner Trail-16
The recommended speed 35 mph speed limit is 3.3 mph below the 85th percentile speed and CVC standards.

0.44 3,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11/3/2011
HCI
266

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

WARNER TRAIL FRED WARING DR TO MILES AVE
DATE:11/3/2011 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:1:25 PM -3:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%55 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%50 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%45 100.0%100.0%X X X 3 2.1%100.0%X X X X 4 2.8%97.9%X X X X 4 2.8%95.2%40 X X X X X X X 7 4.8%92.4%X X X X X 5 3.4%87.6%X X X X X 5 3.4%84.1%X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2%80.7%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3%74.5%35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.7%66.2%X X X X X X X X 8 5.5%54.5%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3%49.0%X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0%40.7%X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9%31.7%30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.0%24.8%X X X X X X X 7 4.8%15.9%X X X X 4 2.8%11.0%X X X X X X 6 4.1%8.3%X X 2 1.4%4.1%25 X X X X 4 2.8%2.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 145 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:38.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:15.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:33.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:73.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:28.8 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:11.0 %
Warner Trail-16

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
267

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

WARNER TRAIL FRED WARING DR TO MILES AVE
DATE:11/3/2011 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:1:25 PM -3:10 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 100.0%58 X 100.0%57 X 100.0%56 X 100.0%55 X 100.0%54 X 100.0%53 X 100.0%52 X 100.0%51 X 100.0%50 X 100.0%49 X 100.0%48 X 100.0%47 X 100.0%46 X 100.0%45 X 100.0%44 X 100.0%43 X 100.0%42 X 97.9%41 X 95.2%40 X 92.4%39 X 87.6%38 X 84.1%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT37X80.7%}PACE36X74.5%}PACE35X66.2%}PACE34X54.5%}PACE33X49.0%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN32X40.7%}PACE31X31.7%}PACE30X24.8%}PACE29X15.9%}PACE28X11.0%- - - - - -15PCT27X8.3%26 X 4.1%25 X 2.8%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:38.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:15.9 %MEDIAN SPEED:33.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:73.1 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:28.8 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:11.0 %
Warner Trail-16
HCI
268

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

WASHINGTON STREET (S/B)FRED WARING DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:12:50 PM -1:20 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MILES

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 51.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 42 - 51 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 69.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36
SPEED-RELATED ACCIDENTS 13
TOTAL ACCIDENTS 19
ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 4.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.73 ACCIDENTS PER MVM (SPEED RELATED ONLY)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - FRED WARING / MILES / VIA SEVILLA-TENNIS GARDENS

CROSSWALKS AT FRED WARING / MILES

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING NO PARKING ANYTIME

OTHER BUS STOPS (SB)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UPHILL GRADE (NB)
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR-POOR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / NONE

STREET LIGHTING NO

DRIVEWAY DENSITY NONE

OTHER RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE PARK / COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL (non-fronting) / TENNIS GARDENS / HOTEL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 50 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

File:Washington-17 2022
The recommended speed 50 mph speed limit is within 1.5 mph of the 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.49 33,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
1/27/2022
HCI
269

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

WASHINGTON STREET (S/B)FRED WARING DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:12:50 PM -1:20 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH.PCT.PCT.60 X X 2 1.4%100.0%0 0.0%98.6%X 1 0.7%98.6%X 1 0.7%97.9%X 1 0.7%97.2%55 X X X 3 2.1%96.5%X X X X X 5 3.5%94.4%X X X 3 2.1%90.8%X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.0%88.7%X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.0%81.7%50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.2%74.6%X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.5%65.5%X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3%57.0%X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.9%50.7%X X X X X X X X 8 5.6%40.8%45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.0%35.2%X X X X X X 6 4.2%28.2%X X X X X 5 3.5%23.9%X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.7%20.4%X X X 3 2.1%12.7%40 X X X X X 5 3.5%10.6%X X X X 4 2.8%7.0%X 1 0.7%4.2%X X X 3 2.1%3.5%X 1 0.7%1.4%35 X 1 0.7%0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%30 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%25 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%20 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%15 0.0%TOTAL VEHICLES 142 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:51.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:18.3 %MEDIAN SPEED:46.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:69.0 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.3 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:12.7 %
Washington-17 2022

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
270

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F I N D I A N W E L L S

WASHINGTON STREET (S/B)FRED WARING DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS DATE:1/27/2022 SURVEY BY:C BUENDIA
TIME:12:50 PM -1:20 PM CHECKED BY:JERRY STOCK
CUMMULATIVE PERCENTSPEED204060 80 10060X 100.0%59 X 98.6%58 X 98.6%57 X 97.9%56 X 97.2%55 X 96.5%54 X 94.4%53 X 90.8%52 X 88.7%51 X 81.7%}PACE- - - - - - - - -85PCT50X74.6%}PACE49X65.5%}PACE48X57.0%}PACE47X50.7%}PACE46X40.8%}PACE- - - - - -MEAN45X35.2%}PACE44X28.2%}PACE43X23.9%}PACE42X20.4%}PACE41X12.7%- - - - - -15PCT40X10.6%39 X 7.0%38 X 4.2%37 X 3.5%36 X 1.4%35 X 0.7%34 X 0.0%33 X 0.0%32 X 0.0%31 X 0.0%30 X 0.0%29 X 0.0%28 X 0.0%27 X 0.0%26 X 0.0%25 X 0.0%24 X 0.0%23 X 0.0%22 X 0.0%21 X 0.0%20 X 0.0%19 X 0.0%18 X 0.0%17 X 0.0%16 X 0.0%15 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:51 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:42 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED:51.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE:18.3 %MEDIAN SPEED:46.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE:69.0 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED:41.3 MPH
PERCENT UNDER PACE:12.7 %
Washington-17 2022
HCI
271

APPENDIX B

272

273

274

275

276

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:061-22 Item #:L.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - Finance April 21, 2022 City Treasurer’s Report for February 2022
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Council RECEIVES and FILES the City Treasurer’s Report for February 2022.

DISCUSSION:

Attached are the monthly cash balance and investment reports for the month of February 2022.

Investments reflected in this report are “Marked-to-Market”, meaning the market value of City’s investments is updated monthly. This method provides a clear depiction of the value of the City’s portfolio subject to the performance of the investment market. The City of Indian Wells continues to maintain prudent fiscal reserves and minimize un-invested cash.

Cash and Investments
As of February 28, 2022:
·The City’s cash and investments totaled $79,470,482.44. ·The City’s portfolio earned a 0.890% rate of return.

Treasurer’s Certification
Compliance - The City Treasurer certifies the City’s cash and investments presented in this Report are in compliance with the City’s investment policy and with legal requirements of State of California Government Code section 53600.

Liquidity - The City Treasurer certifies the City’s portfolio is sufficient to meet its financial obligations for the next six months. The investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements, which might be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by striving to have securities mature at the same time cash is needed to meet anticipated demands (static liquidity). Additionally, since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the portfolio consists largely of securities with active secondary or resale markets (dynamic liquidity).

Fiscal Prudence
When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling, or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™277

File #:061-22 Item #:L.
economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the City, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the City.

Background
Staff provides Council with a monthly update to the Treasurer’s Report. The Report presents the City’s cash activity and investment portfolio and provides reconciliation between investment balances and the General Ledger. Specifically, the report provides information on the types of investments, dates of maturities, costs, updated market value of securities, and rates of interest earned in the portfolio.

The City maintains a written investment policy in compliance with legal requirements of Government Code section 53600 and governs the investments made by the City. It is the policy of the City of Indian Wells to invest public funds in a manner that will provide the maximum security with the highest investment return while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City. The investments purchased by the City are consistent with the City’s investment policy and are allowable under current legislation of the State of California.

The City invests in U.S. treasuries, federal agency securities, medium term corporate notes, municipal bonds, federally insured certificates of deposit, and overnight cash investments. Criteria for selecting investments in order of priority are:
(1) safety, (2) liquidity and (3) yield.

ATTACHMENT:

1. City Treasurer’s Report
City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™278

NET CASH & INVESTMENT SUMMARY FEBRUARY 2022
Februaly
2022
February
202LUNRESTRICTED FUNDS

GENERAL FUND
101- GENERAL

TOTAL GENERAL FUND

RESTRICTED FUNDS

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
202 - TMFFIC SAFETY
203 - PUBLTC SAFETY 1/2 CENT SALES TAX
204 - MEASURE UA''
209 - F.A.M.D. #1
210 - SCAQMD (VEHTCLE REG.)
211 - AB 3229 COPS FUNDING
214 - GAS TAX 2103 MAINTENANCE
215 - GAS TAX 2105 MAINTENANCE
216 - GAS TAX 2106 CONSTRUCT/MAINT
217 - GAS TAX 2107 MAINTENANCE
218 - GAS TAX 2107.5 ENG./ADMTN
219 - GAS TAX RMRA
228. EMERG. UPGMDE SERVICES
247 - AB 939 RECYCLING FUND
248 - SOLID WASTE
251 - STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2OOO-1
253- INDIAN WELLS VILLAS OPERATIONS
254- MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAS OPERATIONS
256- HOUSING AUTHORITY
271 - ELDOMDO DRIVE LLMD
272 - MONTECITO/STARDUST LLMD
273 - CASA DORADO LLMD
274 -THE COVE LLMD
27s - SH 111/rWGR (ENTMNCE) LLMD
276 - CLUB/rW LANE LLMD
277 - COLONY LLMD
278 - COLONY COV ESTATES LLMD
279 - DESERT HORIZONS LLMD
280 - MOUNTAIN GATE LLMD
281 . MOUNTAIN GATE ESTATES LLMD
282 - VILLAGIO LLMD
283 - VAIDYA LLMD
284 - CLUB, SOUTH OF 111 LLMD
285 - MONTELENA LLMD
286 - SUNDANCE LLMD
287 - PROVINCE LLMD
2BB. PROVINCE DBAD

TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
314 . PARK-IN-LIEU FEES
315 - CITYWIDE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FEE
316 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
319 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
321 - HIGHWAY 111 CIRCUI.ATION IMP FEE

TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
$6,683,180.91 $ 5,448,tr6.87
6,683,180.91 5,448,116.87
1,882.96
3,5r4.7r

0.00 2,152,987.49
t2,763.54

0.00 0.00

0.00 669.67
303,785.56
3,855,257.73
489,185.15
24L,925.L4
14,370.84
1,399,039.81
2,r82,rr0.54
14,474,538.26
68,312.60
9,265.09
r,342.20
I,426.05
99,181.39
18,308.37
104,700.88
62,079.5r
L,L44.40
109,841.63
56,519.33
294,463.82
38,693.95
29,298.84
92,890.98
L,445.r5
99,26t.78
601 073.82
26,82L,28'-.19

0.00 74,778.00
5,I37,750.57
213,983.60

0.00 0.00
3,490.95
28,058.14
2,488,99I.L5
r0,970.26
r25,445.r3

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
676.67
198,420.93
3,865,359.09
574,r45.55
869,582.83
L2,739.65
1,393,978.81
2,174,216.54
t4,346,990.94
67,068.54
3,330.03
t7,458.44
L3,577.00
58,018.37
II,447.96
86,762.35
60,905.04
295,483.48
101,338.82
53,104.46
272,r90.56
37,730.6I
22,130.5L
73,652.r2
25,592.35
169,103.20
617 916.64
28,079,966.L2
4,896.00
t22,276.26
8,557,416.93
164,642.0r

0.70 8,849,231.90
1:35 PM4h212022TlCommon\bank\Treasurer's Report\Cash1 0Feb 22-drctt 5,426,512.L7
ATTACHMENT #1
279

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
NET CASH & INVESTMENT SUMMARY FEBRUARY 2022
PAGE 2
RESTRICTED FUNDS (Cont.)

REPLACEMENT FUNDS
326 - BUILDINGS CAPITAL RESERVE
327 - BRIDGES CAPITAL RESERVE
328 - MEDIANS & PARKWAYS CAPITAL RESERVE
329 - STORM DRAINS CAPITAL RESERVE
330 - TRAFFIC SIGNALS CAPITAL RESERVE
331 - TMFFIC SIGNALS CAPITAL RESERVE
332 - CITY STREETS CAPITAL RESERVE
333 - CITY VEHICLES CAPITAL RESERVE

TOTAL REPLACEMENT FUNDS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUNDS
4s3 - RDA (WHTTEWATER)
456 - RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT

TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUNDS

ENTERPRISE FUNDS
560 - INDIAN WELLS GOLF RESORT

TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
601 - OPEB BENEFIT FUND

TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS

RESERVE FUNDS
602 - COMPENSATED ABSENCES

TOTAL RESERVE FUNDS

TRUST & AGENCY FUNDS
732 - SPECIAL DEPOSITS

TOTAL TRUST & AGENCY FUNDS
February
2022
t,756,496.80
1,806,132.00
r,437,624.07
725,970.00
596,579.00
544,8t7.00
19,809,789.00
124,999.00
February
2021
1,436,814,80
r,724,278.00
I,372,168.07
693,215.00
569,314.00
5t9,747.00
18,914,635.00
119,524.00
26$02,406.87
8,373,265.81

0.00 2sp49$es.87
6,078,164.05

0.00 8,373,265.91

1.500.000.00
6,078,164.05

0.00 1,500,000.00
350,915.46

0.o0
65 r72.r9
65,L72,t9350,915.46
611,329.00 609 118.00
611,329.00
949,147.57
949,L47.57
77,518,038.98
486,67I.28
r,030,324.93

17.69 L,924,t70.49
913 381.26
609,118.OO
33t,577.98
33r,577.98
74,gLO,942.99TOTAL ALL FUNDS

FISCAL AGENTS
253 - INDIAN WELLS VILLAS
254 - MOUNTAIN VIEW VILLAS
453 - UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE
560 . INDIAN WELLS GOLF RESORT
601 - PARS SECilON 115 TRUST

TOTAL FISCAL AGENTS

TOTAT ALL FUNDS & FISCAL AGENTS

UNRESTRICTED FUNDS

RESTRICTED FUNDS
4,354,565.65 4,121,909.90
$ 81,872,604.63 $ 78,932,752.99
292,464.27
548,133.46
r,470,273.39
930,929.60
880,009.18
6,683,180.91
75,t89,423.72
5,448'1L6.87
73,484,636.O1
$ 78,9 32,752.88
TlCommon\bank\Treasurer's Report\Cash1 0Feb 22-dtafl
$ 8L,872,6O4.63
1i35 PM4l12l2O22280

Tlcommnuan$ankr€oncilblbn tf2ro022-02_RPT Fsb Sank RecFab22 pohd 1:27 PM 4t122022 Bank Reconciliation Report - City Held Cash
Department
lank Chsking & SwEp
1 2
3 5,
4 8
19 2t
Pacific Wslern Bank - Swep x*-**1117
Pacific W6tern Bank - Accts. Payable **-**3411
Pacific W6tern Bank - Payrcll x*-**1752
Pacific Wstern Eank - Ambulance **-****7937
Pacific Wst€rn Bank - Public Funds MMA **-****5064
Union Bank of CA - Swep Inv6tnent t**-***0121
t,S gank Money Market - Invstment
Petty Cash
2,218,88s.99

0.00 0.00

0.00 501,188.52
997.14
2,1ss,858.71
2,000.00
Managed Pml Amlnts
C€rtifiet6 of Deffiit4t,
438
441
442
44t
/145
457
460
463
454
465
473
/la0
442
'l84443
445
446
498
499
501
507
512
513
5t4
515
5165tt
514
519
s20
521
s22
525
548
550
55'
558
561
s52
4aa
449
523
524
526
533
538
549
556
Certifi@te
C€rtificate
Certificate
Certifi€te
Certificate
of Deposit-EverBank FL 2997502N9
of Depcit-American Exprs Bank 02587CFG0
of Deposit-Arerican b(p6 Centurion 025870566
of Deposit-Synchrcny Bank 87164WRD2
of Deposit{ity National Bank 17801G8R9
Certificate of Deposit-Morgan Stanley Eank 51747MF63
Cedificate of Deposit-Allegiance Bank Tqas 0174808A3
Certificate of Deposit{itiBank NA 17312QH69
CertifiBte of Deposit€oldman Sachs Bank 38148PG43
Certifi€te of Deposit-Sallie llae 795450N84
Certificate of Deposit-First National Bank of Am€ri6 3211oYLK CertifiGte of Deposit-Disover Bank 254573U18
Certifi@te of Deposit-Barclays Bank Delaware 06740KMN4
Certificate of Dep6it{omeniW Capital Bank 20033AM85
Certificate of Deposit-l.,SB Bank USA 903481FF2
Certificate of Deposit-Morgan Stanley Bank 51760ARM3
Certificate of Deposit-Merrick Bank 59013J4x4
Certificate of Deposjt-RlA Federal Credit Union 749622A10 Certificate of Depcit{apital One Bank 14042TAY3
Certifi€te of Deposit-Bankwst 05552CHA2
Certifi@te of Deposit-Wells Fargo Natl Bank Wst 949495AQ9 Certificate of Deposit-Bllw Bank North Americ 05580A\D(9 Certificate of Deposit-Nicolet Nation Bank 654062J22
Certificate of Deposit-Live Oak Banking Company 538036LDr1 Certificate of Deposit-Alma Bank 0200808X4
Certificate of Deposit-State Bank of India 856285TP8
Certifi@te of Deposit-First Natl Bank of Mccregor TX 321121,J01 Certificate of Deposit{ente6tate Bank 15201QDE4
Certificate of Deposit-Northw6t Bank 56735A8V0
Certificate of Deposit-Encore Bank 29260148E4
Certifiete of Deposit-First Freedom Bank 320278AM9
Certificate of Deposit-Pacific W6tern Bank 69506YRI5
Certificate of Deposit-Bank of Barcda 06053HMS9
Certifi@te of Deposit-Toyota Financial Sgs Eank 89235MKY6 CertifiGte of Deposit-Grenstate Credit Union 395731811
Certifiate of Deposit-Pentagon Federal Credit union 709521A5 Certifi@te of Deposit-Nelnet Bank. Inc 64034KAG6
Certificate of Deposit-Beal Bank 07371AYE7
Certificate of Deposit-Beal Bank USA 07371CE88
Medium Tem Cormrate l{otes
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
2s0,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
245,000.00
2s0,000.00
250,000,00
2s0,000.00
248,000.00
2s0,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
247,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
2s0,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
2s0,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
Amazon.com Inc. 023135AW6
Wells Faruo 95001D5U9
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 0ff06MN7
Montebello CA Pens Oblig AA 612285AE6
JP l'lorgan Chas Bank NA 45532FRU1
JP l4organ Chas 48128G2Q2
Bank of Arerica FITN 06048WM31
Bank of Arerica NITN 05048WM72
99r,430.79
1,000,000.00
1,011,985.61
1,053,176.97
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
Federal Agency Isu6
52'
529
530
532
s34
535
536
s39
541
54254
545
551
s52
553
554
s55
559
560
537
531
Items
Outstanding Items
Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Ass. 3135G4C43
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3133E1280
Fed. Farm Crcdit Bank 3134GWCG9
Fed. Nat'l l4orlpage Ass 3135GA223
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3130A1351
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3130A15G4
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3130A15J8
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 313oALDN1
Fed. Farm Cr€dit Bank 3130ALHZ0
Fed, Farm Credit Bank 3130AU52
Fed- Farm Credit Bank 3130ALMM3
Fed. Farm Cr€dit Bank 3130A1W57
Fed. Farm Credit Eank 3130AMW57
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 31338MH21
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3133EM157
Fed. Farm Credit Eank 3133EMN99
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 31338MW73
Fed. Home Lan Eank 3130AQWF5
Fed. Home Lsn Bank 3130AQWJ8
Natomas CA Sch@l District 53877NMM6
Total P@l€d Cash and Investnents
Fair Value Incr@s (over cost)
Oubtanding Warranb/Wire Transfe6
Oubtanding Payrcll Warrants/Wire TransfeE
Depo6its in Transit
Deposit in Transit
Deposit in Transit
D€p6it in Transit
Credit Card in Transit
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,556.08
2,000,000.00

1.000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000-00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
(2,032,983.s3)

0.00 (3,619.74)
(307,728.72)
(2,s00.00)
(113.67)
2,864.94
391,637.25
I 72518,038,98
?r-rrn_dtl-ona

0.00 281

'"ti' "- ..1{ :':,
INDIAN',j,WELLS City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489CALIFORN IA
lnvestments
Bank Certificates of Deposit
Managed Pool Accounts - LAIF
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
Negotiable CD's
Medium Term Corporate Notes
Federal Agency lssues - Callables
Miscellaneous Securities - Coupon
lnvestments
Total Earninqs
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Return
The
ln
Kevin
Reporting period 02l0l 12022-0212812022
The City of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 28,2022
Value
2,993,000.00
22,758,822.74
4,878,930_36
6,982,000.00
1 0,000,000.00
31,000,000.00
800,000.00
79,4',12,753.10
February 28 Month Ending
56,450.02
75,990,067.21

0.97o/o
Market
Value
3,030,241.52
22,758,822.74
4,878,930.36
6,951,176.91
9,754,800.00
29,942,360.00
776,664.O0
78,092,995.53
Par Book
Value
o/o of
Portfolio Term
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360 Equiv.

YTM
365 Equiv.

2.5A7

0.278

0.145

1.789

1.639

0.853

0.662

0.890
Portfolio Clry
AP
PM (PRF_PMl) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
2,993,000.00
22,758,822.74
4,878,930.36
6,982,000.00
1 0,053,805.1 3
31,000,666.08
803,258.1 3
1,826
1 1
1,729
1,704
1,791
1,449
79,470,482.44 100.00% 1,150

3.77 28.64

6.14 8.79

12.65 39.01

1.01 233
1 1
1,O21
1,108
1,454
1,O20

2.552
o.274

0.143

1.765

1.616

0.841

0.653

0.878818
from revenue and maturing investments will be sufficient to cover expenditures for the next six months. All securities are "Marked{o-Market" on a monthly basis.

Run Date: 03/08/2022 - 08:37 No fiscal year history available 282

Average
Balance
2,993,000.00
21,502,108.45
{,627,980.08
Purchase
Date
0210712018
05t24t2017
05t24t2017
0313012017
o3n9l201a
05t30t20'17
03t29t20't7
07t2012018
04n5PO18
0111112018
04n5nu8
05n612017
07t01n020
Par Value
245,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
248,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
2,993,000.00
22,758,822.74

0.00 22,758,822.74
2,218,885.99

0.00 501,188.52
2,155,858.71

0.00 0.00
997.14
2,000.00

0.00 4,878,930.36
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
ilarket Value
248,988.60
251,285.OO
251,285.OO
250,417.50
255,025.00
251,182.50
250,412.50
254,767.92
255,667.50
254,085.00
255,810_00
251 ,3't 5.00
3,030,241.52
22,758,822.74

0.00 22,758,822.74
2,218,885.99

0.00 501,188.52
2,155,858.71

0.00 0.00
997.14
2,000.00

0.00 4,878,930.36
246,942.50
239,846.76
25',t,044.29
254,397.50
YTM Daysto
360 Maturitv
Page I
Maturity
Date
0210712023
o5t24t2022
og24no22
03ROt2022
0312912023
0513112022
0312912022
07t20t2023
04125n023
01t11t2023
04t25t2023
o5t26t2022
The City of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
February 28,2022
CUSIP lnvestment #
Bank Certificates of Deposit
01748DBA3
02587DS66
02587CFG0
74267GVT1
1 7312QH69
17801 GBR9
2997602N9
321 1 0YLK9
38148PG43
61 747MF63
795450N84
87164WRD2
Managed Pool Accounts - LAIF
SYSz1
SYS23
Negotiable CD's
0200808X4
06063HM59
06652CHA2
06740KMN4
lssuer
Allegiance Bank Texas
American Express Centurion
American Express Bank FSB
CIBC Bank USA

CITIBANK NA
City National Bank
Everbank FL
First National Bank of America
Goldman Sachs Bank
Morgan Stanley Bk NA
Sallie Mae
Synchrony Bank
Subtotal and Average
LAIF - City
LAIF - Redevelopment
Alma Bank
Bank of Baroda
Bankwest lnc.

Stated
Book Value Rate Fitch
460
442
441
437
463
445
438
473
464
457
465
443
2'l
23 245,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
248,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
2,993,000.00
22,758,822.74

0.00 22,758,422.74
2,218,885.99

0.00 501,188.52
2,155,858.71

0.00 0.00
997.14
2,000.00

0.00 4,878,930.36
2s0,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
o.278

0.233
o.274

0.230

2.5s2 233

0.274

2.600

2.400

2.200

2.850

2.100

2.250

3.150

3.000

2.650

3.050

2.400

2.564

2.367

2.170

2.811

2.071

2.219

3.107

2.959

2.614

3.008

2.367
343
84 84
29 393
91 28
506
420
316
420
86 Subtotal and Average
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
SYSl
sYs6
sYsT
SYSs
SYS2
SYS3
SYS4
sYs19
SYS5
Pacific Westem Bank
Pacifi c Westem Bank-Ambulance
Pacific \A/estem-PublicFundsM MA
US Bank Money Market
Pacific Western - Acct Payable
Pacific \ /estem-Payroll
Union Bank-Checking
Petty Cash
WestAmerica Bank
Subtotal and Average
1 6
7 8
2 3
4 19
5 08R1t2021
07to1t2020
07tolt2020
071o112020
07t0'1t2020

0.250

0.300

0.250

0.247

0.000

0.296

0.000

0.000
o.247

0.000

0.143
515
525
501
482
03R1t2020
07D2DO20
07t26t2019
10t24t2018

1.400

0.700

2.000

3.250

1.380

0.690

1.973

3.205
'1,123 03t28n025
1,239 07/2?,2025
878 07t26n024
237 10t24n022
Portfolio CITY
AP
PM (PRF_Pt\it2) 7.3.0Run Date: 03/08/2022 - 08:37
Barclays Bank/Delaware
Report Ver. 7.3.6.'1283

Stated
BookValue e-r-
Page2
YTM Days to Maturity
Fitch 360 Maturitu rhtaCUSIPlnvestment #
Negotiable CD's
07371AYE7
07371CE88
05580AVX9
14042T4Y3
15201QDE4
20033AM86
254673U18
29260M8E4
3202784M9
321 12UDR9
395731811
5380361D4
s901 3J4X4
617604RM3
64034KAG6
654062J22
66736A8V0
69506YR15
7096214S1
7496224tO
85628sTF8
89235MKY6
90348JFF2
949495AQ8
Medium Term Corporate Notes
02313sA\,6
06048\ /M31
06048WIv172
06406RAN7
1667644H3
48128G2Q2
46632FRU1
612285AE6
95001 D6U9
lssuer
Beal Bank - Plano TX
Beal Bank USA

BMWBANK NORTH AMERICA
Capital One Bank USA NA
Centerstate Bank NA
Comenity Capital Bank
Discover Bank

ENCORE BANK
First Freedom Bank
First Natl Bank of Mccregor TX
Greenstate Credit Union
Live Oak Banking Company
Merrick Bank
Morgan Stanley Private Bank
Nelnet Bank, lnc.

Nicolet National Bank
Northwest Bank
Pacific Westem Bank CA CD
Pentagon Federal Credit Union
RIA Federal Credit Union
State Bank of lndia NY, NY CD
Toyota Financial Sgs Bk
UBS Bank USA
Wells Fargo Natl Bk West
Subtotal and AveraEe
The City of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
February 28,2022
561
562
512
499
518
484
480
520
s21
517
550
514
486
485
558
513
519
522
557
498
516
548
483
507
Average
6,580,214.29
Purchase
Date
02t23t2022
02n3t2022
o3R1t2020
07n8no19
04130t2020
10R0t2018
1010312018
04t30t2020
04BOnO20
04128t2020
06t16t2021
03/31/2020
11EOaO\g
11loano18
o2lo2Do22
o3t31t2020
04t30t2020
0413012020
09t29t2021
06124t2019
0412912020
0412212021
10t30t2018
01t28t2020
't2to4t2018
05t28t2021
0713012021
o511412020
11t20t2018
02t26t2021
0112212021
07t17t2020
04BOnO20
Par Value Market Value
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
247,O00.O0
248,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
248,405.00
248,405.00
248,100.00
250,754.40
243,751.76
258,692.50
257 ,877.50
246,661.89
246,397.95
245,499.06
239,632.50
246,967.50
255,775.00
254,872.50
243,842.50
246,967.50
244,348.68
243,751.76
237,436.44
253,743.45
246,4't5.28
240,290.00
258,875.00
251,442.69
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
247,OOO.00
248,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000_00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00

1.900

1.550

2.300

1.250

3.450

3.300
1 .150
1 .100

1.350

0.900

1.400

3.400

1.500

1.400

1.200

1.250

0.900

2.500

1.600

0.900

3.500

1.900
1,814
1,814
'l,126
848
1,156
608
581
791
791
1,154
1,568
1,126
325
252
1,799
'tj26
1,156
1,156
1,673
665
1,155
1 ,513
605
322
358
1,549
1,612
1,150
480
1,458
1,423
1,188
425
02117no27
o2t17t202i
o3R1t2025
06n6t2024
04t30t2025
't013012023
1010312023
04R0t2024
o4B0no24
04n812025
06n6n026
03t31t2025
01t20t2023
11t0812022
02t02t2027
0313112025
0413012025
04t30no25
0912912026
12t26t2023
o4D912025
04l22no26
1012712023
o111712023
o2n2t2023
o5t28t2026
0713012026
o4D412025
0612412023
0212612026
01t22t2026
06101n025
04/30n023

1.474

1.874

1.529

0.000

1.233

3.403

3.255

1.135

1.086

1.332

0.888

1.382

3.356

3.352
'1.479

1.382

1.184

1.233

0.888

2.468

1.578

0.888

3.454

1.475
6,982,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000_00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
I,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
6,951,176.91
1,010,120.00
956,080.00
939,830.00
984,740.00
1,019,090.00
950,380.00
1,898,480.00
1,004,340.00
991.740.00
6,982,000.00
991,430.79
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1 ,01 1,985.61
997,211.76

1.000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,053,176.97
1,000,000.00

1.765 1,021
489
549
556
524
488
538
533
526
523
Amazon.com lnc.

Bank of America MTN A
Bank of America MTN A
Bank of New York Mellon Corp
Chevron Corp
JPMorgan Chase & Co
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Montebello CA Pens Oblig AA
Wells Fargo & Company

2.400

1.250

1.200

1.600

3.191

0.800

0.700

2.503

2.150

3.303

1.233

1.184

1.190

3.375

0.789

0.690

0.819

2.959
Portfolio CITY
AP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0Run Date: 03/0&2022 - 08:37
284

CUSIP lnvestment#
The City of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
February 28,2022
Purchase
Date Par Value
10,000,000.00
lssuer
Subtotal and Average
Fed. Farm Credit Bank
Fed. Farm Credit Bank
Fed. Farm Credit Bank
Fed. Farm Credit Bank
Fed. Farm Credit Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Mtg Corp
Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Assoc
Fed. Nat'l Mortgage Assoc
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
Market Value
9,754,800.00
Stated
BookValue Rate
10,053,805.13

Page 3 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
Fitch 360 Maturitv Deta

1.616 1,108
Federal Agency lssues - Callables
Average
Balance
10,054,201.96
32,429,2&.53
803,315.91
75,990,067.2.t
31 33ELZ80
31 33EMH21
31 33EML67
31 33EMN99
3133EMVW3
31 30AL3S1
3130A16G4
31 30AL6J8
313OALDN1
3130ALHZ0
31 30ALJ62
313OALMM3
313041\ /67
3130AMW57
31 3OAQVVF6
3130AOWJ8
3134GVVCG9
3136G4C43
3135G4223
s29
552
553
554
555
534
535
536
539
541
542
544
546
551
559
560
530
527
532
537
531
255651 KY6
63877NMM6
07i29n020
o6n7no21
0612212021
06t30t2021
0712812021
02117t2021
02t25t202'l
02t24t202',1
03/16n021
03t18t2021
03t24t2021
03BOnO21
04i22n021
06t30t2021
02t25t2022
0212412022
07t30t2020
o811412020
11117 12020
0u1a12021
10lo1no20
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
I,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,917 ,220.00
1,926,820.00
'|.925.660.00
1,930,400.00
2,892,240.OO
959,410.00
959,690.00
1,921,160.00
1,928,200.00
959,330_00
968,090.00
1,939,800.00
976,1 00.00
1,933,460.00
1,000,210.00
998,780.00
970,070.00
1,926,700.00
1,909,020.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,666.08
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3l,000,666.08
503,258.1 3
300,000.00
803,2s8.13
79,47O,48'2.4

0.580

0.900

0.800
o.740

0.870

0.625

0.600

0.625

0.800

0.530

0.875

1.000

1.100

0.650

2.150

2.050

0.650

0.560
o.572

0.888

0.789

0.730

0.858
0_616

0.592

0.616

0.789
o.523

0.863

0.986

1.085

0.967

2.'t21

2.O22
o.621

0.641
0_552
1,246
1,567
1,574
1,217
1 ,610
1,449
1,457
1,456
1,476
1,205
1,484
1,490
1 ,513
1,582
1,822
1,821
1,156
1,262
1,357
07t29t2025
od15n026
0612212026
0613012025
07D8t2026
0417t2026
02n5n026
o2t24DO26
o3t16t2026
od18n025
0312412026
o3B0no26
0412212026
06t30t2026
0212512027
02t24t2027
0413012025
08t't4t2025
1111712025
llf iscellaneous Securities - Coupon
31,000,000.00
500,000.00
300,000.00
800,000.00
79,412,753.10
29,942,360.00
485,865.00
290,799.00
776,664.00
78,092,995.53

0.672
't.100

0.395

1.085

0.841 1,458

0.653 1,020

0.878 8t8
884 08t01t2024
1,249 08t01t2025
Dixon CA Unified School Dist
Natomas CA Sch Dist AA lnsured
Subtotal and Average
Portfolio CITY
AP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0Run Date; 0348/2022 - 08:37
285

LSELWINDIAN,'City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489CAL $RN:A
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
201 4, 2015, 2016, 2020 Series
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 28,2022
Value
1,330,014.28
1,330,014.28
Market
Value
1 ,330,014.28
1,330,014.28
o/o ot
Portfolio
1,330,014.28 100_00
1,330,014.28 100.00%
Par Book
Value
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
YTM
365 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 14A
CP
PM (PRF_PM1)7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Term
1 Total Earnings
Current Year
Average ly Balance
of Return
Reporting pefiod 02101 12022-0A2A2022
February 28 Month Ending

0.00 47,509.85

0.00%
Run Date: 03/0812022 - 09:46 No fiscal year history available 286

201 4, 2015, 2016, 2020 Series
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
February 28,2022
Purchase
Date ParValue

Page 1 ends

Stated YTM Days to Maturity
Book Value R'tA Fitch 365 Maturih,CUSIP lnvestment #
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
SYS28
sYs26
sYs2s
SYS27
sYs24
Subtotal and Avenge
Total and Average
28 26
25 27
1 lssuer
20144 Bonds Reserve
All Bond Series Principal
All Bond Series lnterest
All Bond Series Debt Svc
Cost Of lssuance Escrow
Average
Balance
47,509.85
47,509.8s
07to1t2020
07rc1no20
0710112020
07lo1no20
07to1t2020

1.00 0.03
1,238,827.50
91,185.75

0.00 1,330,014.28
1,330,014.28
Market Value

1.00 0.03
1,23A,827.50
91,185.75

0.00 1,330,014.28
1,330,0{4.28

1.00 0.03
1,238,827.50
91,185.75

0.00 1,330,014.28
1,330,014.28

0.000

0.000 1
Portfolio 14A
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0Run Date: 03/08/2022 - 09:46
Report Ver 7.3.6.1287

ELLS
i '.:::'- :!'-,-':'.
i'''wINDIAN City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489CALITORNIA
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
of Return
Reporting petiod O2lO1 12O22-OZ2A2O22
2015 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 28,2022
Par Market
Value

1.00 1.00

1.00 100.00

1.00 100.00%
Book
Value
Y. of
Portfolio
Days to
Maturity
YTM
350 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
YTM
365 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 15A
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Value

1.00 1.00
February 28 Month Ending
Term

0.00 1.00

0.00%
Run Date:03/08/2022 - 09:50 No fiscal year history available 288

2015 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
February 28,2022
Purchase
Date ParValue

1.00 1.00
Page I
Stated YTM Days to Maturity
BoOk Valuo p.ra Fiich 365 MrtilritvCUSIPlnvestmenl #lssuer Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
SYS27 27 20'15 A Reserve
SYS22 22 UBC Cost Of lssuance Escroil
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
Average
Balance

1.00 1.00
o8t31no21
071o112020

1.00 0.00

1.00 0.00
Market Value

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.00

1.00 1.00

0.000

0.000
1 Portfolio'l5A
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0Run Date: 03/0812022 - 09:50
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1289

INDIAN WELLS 2016 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 28,2022
City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489cArrfctlNr,{
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Balance
of Return
Agency
Reporting petiod 02101 12022-0212812022
Par Market
Value

1.00 1.00

1.00 100.00

1.00 100.00%
Book
Value
o/" ol
Portfolio
Days to
Maturity
YTM
350 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
YTM
365 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 16A
CP
PM (PRF_PMl) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Value

1.00 1.00
February 28 Month Ending
Term

0.00 1.00

0.00%
Run Date: 03/08/2022 - 09:53 No fiscal year history available 290

2016 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
February 28,2022
Purchase
Date Par Value
Page I
Stated YTM Daysto Maturity
Book Value rrra Fitch 36s Maturitv ItrtoCUSIPlnvestment# tloney Market Sweep/Checking Account
sYs28
SYS33 2
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
lsauer
UBC Cost Of lssuance Escrow
Union Bank Reserve Account
Average
Balance

1.00 1.00
oTto'1t2020
oTto'u2020

0.00 1.00

0.00 't.00
Market Value

1.00 1.00

0.00 1.00
L00

1.00 0.000

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 16A
CP
PM (PRF PM2) 7.3.0Run Date: 03/08U2022 - 09:53
Report Ver 7.3.6.1291

INDIAN., WELLS 2O2O A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 28,2022
City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA922'lO
(760)346-2489CALTTONNiA
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Return
Kevin Treasuer
Reporting period 02101 12O22-OA2U2O22
Par Market
Value

1.00 1.00

1.00 100.00

1.00 ,t00.00%
Book
Value
Yo ol
Portfolio
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
YTM
355 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 20A
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Value

1.00 1.00
February 28 Month Ending
Term
1I

0.00 r.00

0.00%
Run Dater 03/08/2022 - 'lO:00 No fiscal year history available 292

Average
CUSIP lnvestment# lssuer Bahnce
illoney Market Sweep/Checking Account
2020 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
February 28,2022
Purchase
Date Par Value
Page I
sYsl
SYS2
2020 A Bonds COI
2020 A Bonds Reserve
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average

0.00 1.00

0.00 1.00
Stated
Bookvalue Rab Fitch

0.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Maturiv
Data
Portfolio 20A
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
YTM Daysto
365 Maturitv
2 07to1t2020
07to1n020
Market Value

1.00 't.00

0.000

1.00 1.00

1.00 r.00

0.000

0.000
Run Date: 03/08/2022 - 10:00
Report Ver 7.3.6.1293

.-:. t
| --. t
t....

INDIAN .',WELLS

CALITORNIA
City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489
2022 Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
February 28,2022
Value
12,089,085.66
't2,089,085.66
February 28 Month Ending

0.00 10,099,233.98

0.00%
Market
Value
12,089,085.66
12,089,085,66
12,089,085.66 100.00
12,089,085.66 100.00%
Par Book
Value
%oI
Portfiolio
Days to
Maturity 350 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
YTM
365 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
Poftlolio22
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver 7.3.6.1
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Return
Agency
Reporting petiod 02101 12022-0212812022
Term
11 Run Dale: 03l31n022 - 14:21 No fiscal year history available 294

AverageCUSIP lnvestment # lssuer Balance
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
2022 Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
February 28,2022
Purchase
Date ParValue
Page I
Stated YTM Days to MaturityBookvalue Rate Filch 365 Maturitv ft.fe SYS2
sYsl
2022 Bonds COI
2022 Bonds Project Fund
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
2 1
0211012022
0211012022
38,303.66
12,050,782.OO
12,089,085.66
12,089,085.65
Market Value
38,303.66
't2,050,782.0O
12,089,085.65
12,089,085.66
38,303.66
12,O50,782.O0
12,089,085.66
12,089,085.66

0.000

0.000
't0,099,233.98
10,099,233.98

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 22
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0RunD e:O3B12O22-14:21
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1295

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:062-22 Item #:A.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - City Manager’s Office April 21, 2022 Public Safety Crime Prevention Updates and Initiatives
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Council APPROVES the implementation of a Home Security Rebate Program, including the allocation of $20,000 to the Police Budget;
AUTHORIZES the City Manager to execute any documentation for same; and APPROVES the Home Security Rebate Program and other measures outlined in this report to replace the Vacant Home Check Program; and
RECEIVES and FILES updates regarding Public Safety Initiatives.

DISCUSSION:

Over the past few months, the Public Safety Committee (Committee) has met to discuss various programs designed to continue providing Indian Wells residents and guests with “superior public safety services.”
At the March 17, 2022, City Council meeting, Staff presented numerous crime prevention initiatives designed to improve coverage and communication with the community. The following is an update to the City’s public safety services and initiatives.

Updates

1. Outreach
The Sheriff’s Department has begun meeting with Neighborhood Groups and Homeowner Associations (HOAs) to address specific concerns in their communities and discuss crime prevention measures. This effort includes offers to meet with each gated community, hotel partner, and other neighborhood groups to assess the security, lighting, camera systems, etc. of these locations.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™296

File #:062-22 Item #:A.

Coffee with a Cop programs have increased to every other month at the Indian Wells Golf Resort.

These events have been posted to the City’s website calendar of events and residents have been notified via eBlast.

Indian Wells Community Service Officers (CSOs) are currently enrolled in a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Program (CPTED) training which will enable them to meet individually with homeowners on best practices in lighting, landscaping, alarm, camera systems, etc. to better secure their homes and reduce the opportunity for crime to occur. This is a free service provided by Indian Wells CSOs beginning May 1, 2022; Residents can add themselves to a waitlist for this service by contacting the Sheriff’s Department and leaving a voicemail for Lieutenant Wright.

A Public Safety Social Media Campaign strategy began on Wednesday, April 6 utilizing the hashtag #IWFastFact. These weekly posts allow the city to easily provide highly visible information regarding public safety services to Indian Wells residents.

Updates have been made to the City’s Public Safety webpages to provide easy access to crime prevention information, including how to better secure their homes, a link to the Sheriff’s Department’s Camera Registration Program, access to online reporting of property crimes, and more. In addition, a separate public safety mailing will be sent out in the coming weeks to inform the community on all these increased public safety efforts.

2. Coverage
At the February 17, 2022, Council meeting, Lieutenant David Wright provided the Council an update on recent improvements to policing efforts in the community. The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department deployed their Street Racing Team, conducted two speed stings over the last four months, and increased traffic enforcement to address speeding in the community.

Both the Committee and City Council endorse Staff’s recommendation to continue the utilization of budgeted overtime to increase police presence and patrol to address traffic enforcement, burglary suppression, and other specialized efforts (e.g., speed stings, specialized Race Team, commercial enforcement, etc.). Staff will present a request for increased overtime funds for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 to not only accommodate these costs, but to set aside enough funding to cover the cost associated with adding a motor officer to the other three days of the week, providing 7 day a week traffic coverage.

Additionally, on March 17, Council authorized the immediate increase of two additional deputies to the Sheriff’s contract to provide increased evening patrol staffing at a $1 million annualized budget increase. This additional coverage began on March 31 st.

3. Miramonte Security
Committee members received requests regarding a lock at the gate separating the Miramonte City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™297

File #:062-22 Item #:A.

Committee members received requests regarding a lock at the gate separating the Miramonte Resort & Spa from the cul-de-sac on the north end of Indian Wells Lane. The Committee recognizes that the gate is located on private property and recommends Council leave it to the owner to choose whether and how to secure the gate.

Requested Actions

1. Home Security Rebate Program
Both the Committee and City Council had requested Staff examine the possibility of a security camera rebate program, similar to the Ring program offered by the city in 2019.

During the April 12 Special Public Safety Committee meeting, Staff informed the Committee that in 2019, Council had allocated $10,000 toward the Ring Partnership Program, allowing 200 households to receive $100 off the purchase of one (1) eligible Ring device. 55 of these vouchers were distributed at a cost to the city of $2,700.

The Committee supports Staff’s recommendation that Council allocate $20,000 toward a city-run Home Security Rebate Program, whereby 200 households can receive a 50% rebate (up to $100) toward the purchase of any brand of security cameras, lighting, alarm systems, etc. in an effort to encourage additional security in our neighborhoods.

2. Vacant Property Check Program
During the March 17, 2022 City Council meeting, Staff presented information regarding the perception versus reality of how the Vacant Property Checks are run, and addressed the lack of documentation for the Program, requesting adoption of a formal policy.

At that time, Council voted to have these items addressed in greater detail with the Public Safety Committee to assist Staff with providing a recommendation to the Council regarding the Program.

At the April 12, 2022 Special Public Safety Committee meeting, the Committee reviewed this information and is recommending the Vacant Property Check Program be replaced by the CSO CPTED Program, the implementation of a Home Security Rebate Program, and ongoing efforts to educate the community on how to best protect themselves against criminal activity.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of these initiatives is as follows:
·CPTED Training for 2 CSOs was $1,190 and was paid with available funds from the Police Budget.
·City Council approved an immediate increase to the contract with Riverside County Sheriff by City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™298

File #:062-22 Item #:A.
12 service hours, thereby increasing the number of sworn officers in the City. o For the remainder of Fiscal Year 2021-2022, Staff estimates this will add an additional $350,000 to Sheriff services.
o For Fiscal Year 2022-2023, the Sheriff contract hours increase equates to an additional $1,102,570 which Council authorized adding to the Police Budget. ·Staff will request that police overtime increase to $150,000 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 during Mid -Year Budget Review.
·Staff is requesting $20,000 for the implementation of a Home Security Rebate Program. ·Coffee with a Cop events run approximately $200 each for a total of $1,200 for calendar year 2022. These events are paid for with available funds from the Police Budget. ·The #IWFastFact Social Media Campaign is paid for under our Communications Retainer. ·The Public Safety website updates are paid for under our Communications Retainer.

Total Cost: $1,624,960
City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™299

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:RES-020-22 Item #:B.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - City Clerk’s Office April 21, 2022 Resolution Amending the City Council Policy Manual
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Council ADOPTS Resolution amending the City Council Policy Manual.

DISCUSSION:

The City Council Policy Manual (Manual) was first adopted by the Council in 1991. The purpose for a Manual is to establish rules by which the City Council will conduct business and activities. At the November 4, 2021, Council Meeting, the Council formed an Ad Hoc Committee composed of Mayor Pro Tem Donna Griffith and Council Member Greg Sanders to conduct a comprehensive review and to recommend revisions to the Council.

The Ad Hoc Committee in consultation with the City Attorney and staff, reviewed the Manual, as well as the City’s Municipal Code, Charter, Fiscal Policies and Procedures, Administrative Manual, and various state laws and regulations, as various sections in the Manual restated existing requirements.

Upon review of the Manual several changes of the Manual are being recommended to be removed and relocated to an informational guide to streamline and focus the Manual on rules that should govern the Council that are not already established elsewhere, as summarized below:
·Chapter 2.03 Council/Manager Plan and Chapter 2.04 City Manager Duties:City Manager functions, duties, compensation, requirements are outlined in the City’s Municipal Code and Employment Contract.
·Chapter 2.05 Duties:City Attorney duties and requirements are outlined within the Attorney Employment Contract.
·Chapter 2.06 Priority Resources: The Chapter is reiterated throughout the Manual. ·Chapter 2.13 Council Compensation, expenditure guidelines and golf Benefits for Council Members and their spouses are provisions in the City Charter. ·Chapter 2.15 City’s Non-Discrimination Policy:The City has zero tolerance for any discriminatory conduct and as required by State law, Council partake in workshops on City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™300

File #:RES-020-22 Item #:B.
discriminatory conduct and as required by State law, Council partake in workshops on harassment.
·Chapter 2.16 Dress Code, Chapter 5.02 Identification of Personnel, and Chapter

5.03 Security:The three provisions are established in the City’s Administrative Manual. ·Chapter 3.01 Open Meetings/Brown Act:The Council has a requirement to comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act as its California State law.
·Chapter 3.05 Rotation and Duties of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem:The rotation of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem was adopted by the voters on March 3, 2020, election and is governed by the Municipal Code.
·Chapter 3.10 Filling Vacant Position:Under the California Elections Code established provisions are in place when Council vacancies occur.
·Chapter 3.11 Agendas and Chapter 3.03 Minutes:The provisions are established in the Administrative Policy Manual that sets forth agenda and minute processes.

The informational guide created includes the Chapters relocated from the Manual to assist the Council with information of existing rules and regulations, copy of the guide is available in the Clerk’s office.

Additional Revisions:Several additional changes made throughout the Manual include:
·Chapters relocated or combined to aid clarity in the Manual: (i.e. combined chapters include; Council Functions and Council Goals; Roles and Responsibilities of Council and Expectations of Mayor; Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest; Civility Guidelines and Council Conduct); and ·Section 2.05.030 additions include ex parte communications; and section 3.03.070 Commission/Committee applications will remain active for 6-months following the closing of the annual recruitment for any unexpected vacancies; and ·Section 2.10.050 Council Member Conflicts is streamlined to be more flexible and efficient and to focus more on the Council as a body.

The proposed Council Manual is attached to the resolution as Exhibit A. Under a separate cover, the Manual with edits is available on the City’s website ( www.cityofindianwells.org http://www.cityofindianwells.org >).

ATTACHMENT:

1. Resolution
City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™301

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL

POLICY MANUAL
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells (the “City Council”) has determined that policies guiding its operation should be memorialized in a policy manual; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-20 which amended and restated the City Council Policy Manual on May 20, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend various Chapters in Title 1 (Information), Title 2 (Administrative), and Title 3 (Legislative) in the City Council Policy Manual; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to remove duplicate sections of existing City and State law rules and regulations from the Council Policy Manual, and consolidate sections to aid clarity attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells RESOLVES as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council APPROVES the amendments to the City Council Policy Manual, as set forth in Exhibit “A.”
SECTION 2. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at a regular meeting held on this 21st day of April 2022. ________________________________

DANA REED
MAYOR
ATTACHMENT #1
302

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2022-21

Page 2 ends

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2022-21

I, Angelica Avila, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five (5); that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells on the 21st day of April 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

___________________________________ ________________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
303

26529.00000\34999753.9

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL

POLICY MANUAL
Exhibit "A"
304

Page | 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE 1 INFORMATION
CHAPTER 1.01 MISSION, VISION AND VALUE STATEMENTS ...................................... 7

1.01.010 Mission Statement ................................................................................. 7

1.01.020 Vision Statement ................................................................................... 7

1.01.030 Value Statement ................................................................................... 8 TITLE 2 ADMINISTRATIVE
CHAPTER 2.01 POLICY MANUAL PURPOSE ............................................................... 10

2.01.010 Policy Manual Purpose ......................................................................... 10

2.01.020 Indian Wells Interchangeable Agencies ................................................ 11 CHAPTER 2.02 FORM OF GOVERNMENT .................................................................... 12

2.02.010 Overview ............................................................................................ 12 CHAPTER 2.03 COUNCIL COUNCIL FUNCTIONS ........................................................ 13

2.03.010 Introduction ....................................................................................... 13

2.03.020 City Council Functions ......................................................................... 13

2.03.030 City Council Goals ............................................................................... 14

2.03.040 Council Attendance Policy .................................................................... 15

2.03.050 City Representation ............................................................................. 15

2.03.060 Council Non-Participation Administrations ............................................. 15

2.03.070 Roles in Disaster ................................................................................. 15

2.03.080 Roles in Information Flow .................................................................... 16

2.03.090 Magnitude of Information Request ....................................................... 18 CHAPTER 2.04 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF COUNCIL MEMEBERS ................ 19

2.04.010 Overview ............................................................................................ 19

2.04.020 Expectation of Manager ....................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2.05 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION ............................................................. 21

2.05.010 Overview ............................................................................................ 21

2.05.020 Email .................................................................................................. 21

2.05.030 Ex Parte Communication...................................................................... 22

2.05.040 Election Period Prohibition ................................................................... 22 305

Page | 3
CHAPTER 2.06 USE OF PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT OR RESOURCES .......................... 24

2.06.010 Overview ............................................................................................ 24

2.06.020 Non-City Business ............................................................................... 24

2.06.030 City Manager Authorization .................................................................. 24

2.06.040 Individual Council Member's Request ................................................... 24

2.06.050 Council Business ................................................................................. 25 CHAPTER 2.07 CODE OF ETHICS AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST ................................ 26

2.07.010 AB1234 Ethics Training ........................................................................ 26

2.07.020 Political Reofrm Act:Conflict of Interest ................................................ 26

2.07.030 Identifying Conflicts ........................................................................... 27

2.07.040 Nepotism. ........................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER 2.08 DISTRIBUTION OF CITY-CONTROLLED TICKETS TO CITY OFFICIALS .. ……………………………………………………………………………………30

2.08.010 Purpose and Application of Policy . ....................................................... 30

2.08.020 Definitions .......................................................................................... 30

2.08.030 General Provisions .............................................................................. 31

2.08.040 Ticket Administrator ............................................................................ 32

2.08.050 Official Duties and Ceremonial Roles .................................................... 33

2.08.060 Specific Governmental or Public Purpose for Ticket Distribution ............. 33

2.08.070 Ticket Distributed at the Behest of a City Official ................................... 35

2.08.080 Public Purposes Related to BNP Paribas Open ....................................... 35

2.08.090 Public Purposes Related to City Sponsored Events ................................. 35

2.08.100 Disclosure Requirements ..................................................................... 35

2.08.110 Annual Review of Ticket and Campaign Contributions............................ 36 CHAPTER 2.09 PRESS RELATIONS .................................................................. 37

2.09.010 Official Position of the City ................................................................... 37

2.09.020 Press Releases .................................................................................... 37

2.09.030 Dealing with the Media ........................................................................ 37

2.09.040 Council Members Speaking on Their Own Behalf ................................... 37 CHAPTER 2.10 CIVILITY GUIDELINES ............................................................ 39

2.10.010 Overview ............................................................................................ 39

2.10.020 Commitment to Civil Behavior .............................................................. 39

2.10.030 Pledge of Civility ................................................................................. 39

2.10.040 Council Conduct and Relationship with Electors…………………………………. 40

2.10.050 Policy Enforcement by Council………………………………………………………… . 40 CHAPTER 2.11 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED INFORMATION ................... 41

2.11.010 Release of Attorney-Client Privileged Information ................................ 41 306

Page | 4
CHAPTER 2.12 COUNCIL FINANCIAL MATTERS .............................................. 42

2.12.010 Budget Expenditures .......................................................................... 42 TITLE 3 LEGISLATIVE
CHAPTER 3.01 MEETING SCHEDULE ........................................................................ 44

3.01.010 Meeting Schedule ................................................................................ 44

3.01.020 Criteria for Matters Covered ................................................................. 45

3.01.030 Placing Items on Agenda ..................................................................... 45

3.01.040 Removal of Agenda Items ................................................................... 46

3.01.050 Continuing of Agenda Items ................................................................ 46

3.01.060 Communications Received After Agenda Distribution ............................. 46 CHAPTER 3.02 RULES OF DECORUM FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AT MEETINGS ……………………………………………………………………………………47

3.02.010 Purpose .............................................................................................. 47

3.02.020 Public Meeting Decorum ...................................................................... 47

3.02.030 Addressing the Council ........................................................................ 47

3.02.050 Values of Respect ............................................................................... 48

3.02.060 Enforcement of Order .......................................................................... 49 CHAPTER 3.03 COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS ................................... 50

3.03.010 Introduction ....................................................................................... 50

3.03.020 Council Relationship with Commissions, Committees and Boards ........... 50

3.03.030 Role of Ex-Officio Member ................................................................... 51

3.03.040 Work Plan ........................................................................................... 51

3.03.050 Appointment of Resident Members ....................................................... 51

3.03.060 Membership of Current Commissions, Committees and Boards ............... 52

3.03.070 Policy for Selection and Appointment of Resident Members ................... 52

3.03.080 Simultaneous Service Prohibition .......................................................... 55

3.03.090 Annual Review of Commission, Committee and Board Relevance ........... 55 CHAPTER 3.04 OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS, REGIONAL AUTHORITIES AND CITY COMMITTEES ............................................................................................ 56

3.04.010 Outside Organizations, Regional Authorities and City Committees .......... 56

3.04.020 Procedure for Council Member Assignments ......................................... 56

3.04.030 Reporting Responsibilities of Appointees ............................................... 57

3.04.040 Representational Responsibilities of Appointees .................................... 57

3.04.050 Current Appointments ......................................................................... 58 CHAPTER 3.05 COUNCIL STANDING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES ............................. 59

3.05.010 Establishment of Council Standing and Ad Hoc Committees ................... 59 307

Page | 5

3.05.020 Procedure for Council Ad Hoc Assignments ........................................... 59

3.05.030 Notice of Standing Committee Meetings ............................................... 59

3.05.040 Ad Hoc Committee Meetings ................................................................ 60

3.05.050 Report of Standing and Ad Hoc Committees ......................................... 60

3.05.060 Annual Review of Standing and Ad Hoc Committees Necessity ............... 60 308

Page | 6

TITLE 1

INFORMATION

309

Page | 7

TITLE 1 INFORMATION
Chapters:

1.01 Mission, Vision, and Value Statements

CHAPTER 1.01

MISSION, VISION, AND VALUE STATEMENTS

Sections:

1.01.010 Mission Statement.

1.01.020 Vision Statement.

1.01.030 Value Statement.

1.01.010 MISSION STATEMENT.

Create an unsurpassed quality of life for our residents and guests by providing superior public safety, exceptional service and outstanding amenities that will further enhance our image as a prestigious community and international resort destination.

1.01.020 VISION STATEMENT.

Indian Wells is a globally distinguished residential and resort community offering an extraordinary environment, activities and events and is known for its alluring and distinctive hotels, restaurants, golf, tennis, and natural amenities.

Indian Wells is known and respected as a forward thinking, innovative and well managed community that supports the interest of the community and its neighboring communities meeting public needs without undue intrusion into individual lives.

Indian Wells supports a unique and friendly atmosphere for its residents, guests and neighbors and recognizes its responsibility to support appropriate human services.

Indian Wells is dedicated to its economic and environmental sustainability. Indian Wells accomplishes the widest range of opportunity for its residents and guests through working with others to achieve outstanding cultural, recreational, and commercial activities.

310

Page | 8

1.01.030 VALUE STATEMENT.

The City of Indian Wells is dedicated to:

1. Fiscal accountability and responsibility.

2. Open and inclusive government.

3. Highest professional standards and ethics.

4. Exceptional customer services.

5. Effective and efficient operations without undue bureaucracy.

6. Continuous improvement in the organization and staff.

7. Teamwork and individual development to foster success.

8. Attraction and retention of outstanding talent in its staff and appointed officials.

311

Page | 9

TITLE 2

ADMINISTRATIVE

312

Page | 10

TITLE 2 ADMINISTRATIVE

Chapters:

2.01 Policy Manual Purpose

2.02 Form of Government

2.03 City Council Functions

2.04 Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members

2.05 Council Communication

2.06 Use of City Personnel, Equipment or Resources

2.07 Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest

2.08 Distribution of City Controlled Tickets to City officials

2.09 Press Relations

2.10 Civility Guidelines

2.11 Attorney-Client Privileged Information

2.12 Council Financial Matters

CHAPTER 2.01

POLICY MANUAL PURPOSE

Sections:

2.01.010 Policy Manual Purpose.

2.01.020 Indian Wells Interchangeable Agencies.

2.01.010 PURPOSE.

The City Council (hereafter referred to as the “Council”) shall adopt a City Council Policy Manual by resolution detailing the rules of order, policies, and procedures by which the Council shall conduct Council business and activities. The policies and procedures contained herein are established so that expectations and practices can be clearly articulated to guide Council Members in their actions. All elected officials are obligated to follow the policies and procedures contained in this policy and procedure manual.

In the event of any conflict between these policies and procedures and any ordinances, resolutions, agreements or contracts, ordinances, resolutions, agreements, or contracts prevail. The City Attorney is the final authority in deciding the meaning and interpretation of the Manual.
313

Page | 11

(a) Amending and Updating the Policy Manual.

The Council shall determine its own policies and procedures and amend them from time to time and/or adopt new ones by resolution. Substantive amendments and updates shall be adopted and incorporated by resolution.

(b) Corrections Not Requiring a Resolution.

The City Clerk shall update the Table of Contents and information sections, nouns, or personal pronouns, not changing the substantive matters, on an as needed basis, and shall not require a resolution or action of the Council and shall be considered an administrative act.

2.01.020 INDIAN WELLS INTERCHANGEABLE AGENCIES.

The City Council Policy Manual shall apply to the Indian Wells Housing Authority, Finance Authority, Successor Agency and for purposes of this document, the terms City, Council, Housing Authority Board, Finance Authority, Successor Agency shall be considered interchangeable. The City Clerk shall serve as the Board’s Secretary and the City Attorney shall serve as the Authority's Legal Counsel.

314

Page | 12

CHAPTER 2.02

FORM OF GOVERNMENT

Sections:

2.02.010 Overview.

2.02.010 OVERVIEW.

The Council acts as a body. Policies are established by a majority vote of the Council, with all members having an equal vote. All Council members, including the Manager, have equal powers.

While an individual member may disagree with a decision of the majority, the decision of the majority does bind the Council to a course of action. In turn, it is the City Manager’s responsibility to ensure that the policy and direction of the Council, as determined by the Council majority, is upheld. Staff’s implementation of Council-majority direction does not reflect any bias against a Council Member who held a minority opinion on an issue.

315

Page | 13

CHAPTER 2.03

CITY COUNCIL FUNCTIONS

Sections:

2.03.010 Introduction

2.03.020 City Council Functions

2.03.030 City Council Goals

2.03.040 Attendance Policy

2.03.050 City Representation

2.03.060 Council Non-Participation in Administration

2.03.070 Role in Disaster

2.03.080 Roles in Information Flow

2.03.090 Magnitude of Information

2.03.010 INTRODUCTION.

In theory, the distinction between policy and administration has been that policy is the process of determining what is to be done, while administration is the process of determining how to do it. A policy is what the Council defines it to be. However, the day- to-day operation of the various departments is administration. A fine line exists between policy and administration; any issue that is perceived as important or controversial can become a “policy” matter.

The Council has the final say in major decisions such as adoption of the budget or selling a bond issue. While it has a dominant role in policy matters, the City manager, staff, and citizens play a prominent role in the development of policies. The Council, City manager, and staff analyze City needs, identify available resources, and suggest courses of action, but the Council has the final say on matters that affect services.

2.03.020 COUNCIL'S FUNCTIONS.

The Council is the legislative authority that creates and enacts the policies and ordinances under which the City operates. The Council acts on all legislative matters of the City, considering, approving, or adopting all ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and matters requiring policy decisions. Ultimately, the Council provides leadership through policy development and establishes the current practices and future direction of the City. The Council also sets priorities for the City and determines the type and level of programs and services provided by the City.

The Council plays the primary role in defining the forces of change that are shaping the community; this direction is set through policies expressed in the adopted plans for the community, such as the General Plan, through ordinances, like Zoning and Subdivision 316

Page | 14

codes, as well as, through approvals of the budget, the five-year capital improvements program and the staff’s annual work program.

2.03.030 COUNCIL GOALS.

Council members are local leaders. The electorate expects the Council to set the tone and direction for municipal operations. To provide effective management of resources, the Council utilizes a Strategic Plan and Goals to carry out and execute the Mission, Vision, and Values of the City. Strategic planning and goal setting are the tools that enable a Council to define their vision and determine methods for accomplishing their goals. Council members are elected to provide leadership in setting goals and in formulating policies.

The Council is the focal point for identifying and interpreting the wishes of the citizens and translating these into specific programs. Successful goal setting and policy formulation largely depend on a good working relationship amongst the Council and between the Council and the administrative staff. Under the City Manager’s direction, staff can aid in analyzing the City’s needs, suggesting action programs, and calculating the costs of proposals. However, the Council has the final responsibility for establishing local policies and determining services and budget levels appropriate for the City.

The Council should establish City-wide goals that address short- and long-range needs of the community. Goal setting requires time, commitment, and a well-defined process.

Every year, the Council meets with the City Manager and the various department directors in a goal setting/priority projects session to review progress on goals previously set and defines new goals and objectives for the City. The advantages of engaging in the goal setting process are:

(a) Goal setting gives the Council a basic framework for action. By setting goals and then deciding those that are most important, the Council is defining what it wants to achieve over a given period. Otherwise, the Council may find itself floating from issue to issue, crisis to crisis.

(b) Goal setting helps the Council spend its time more efficiently. When goals to be accomplished are clearly defined, the Council can allocate time and resources efficiently.

(c) Goal setting allows every Council member a chance to share their individual goals and priorities and for the Council to work out any differences. The Council then has a list of goals to which everyone is committed.

(d) Goal setting gives the City Manager clear guidelines to get the job done.

Goals give the City Manager clear direction for what the Council is trying to accomplish as a group. Without clearly defined goals, the City Manager may get conflicting signals 317

Page | 15

from the Council and not meet the Council goals.

(e) Goal setting gives the Council and staff important budget guidelines.

Knowing which programs and issues are the highest priorities will enable staff to allocate funding when preparing the budget for Council approval.

(f) Goal setting gives the Council an evaluation tool. When goals and priorities are set, the Council has valuable data to determine how well the Council and the City Manager did in achieving the agreed upon goals and priorities.

2.03.040 COUNCIL ATTENDANCE POLICY.

Any Council member, who has called the Manager or the City Manager prior to the meeting to advise of their absence, may request to be excused by the Council.

Council Members are expected to always provide their contact information.

2.03.050 CITY REPRESENTATION.

Council members are always viewed as representatives of the City. The conduct of Council members is a direct reflection on the City and should conduct themselves accordingly.

Except where specifically authorized by Council action or for purely ceremonial purposes, no Council Member should make any statement or appearance or indicate in any way that he or she is officially representing the City.

2.03.060 COUNCIL NON-PARTICIPATION IN ADMINISTRATION.

To uphold the integrity of the Council-Manager form of government and to provide proper checks and balances, members of the Council shall refrain from becoming directly involved in the administrative affairs of the City, which includes the Indian Wells Golf Resort, unless directed by a majority of the Council to participate in a specific policy or project.

2.03.070 ROLE IN DISASTER.

The Council should refer to the City’s Disaster Preparedness Plan for specifics, but generally the Council has some special, extraordinary powers in the case of a disaster.

Some meeting restrictions and expenditure controls are eased in such extreme situations.

In critical situations the Council may be directed by the City manager or Emergency Services Director to assemble in the City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC), located within the Police sub-station, to provide policy guidance and to receive information in an emergency. Should the Council not be available during an emergency, State law specifies a hierarchy of others who may serve in place of the Council. 318

Page | 16

2.03.080 ROLES AND INFORMATION FLOW.

It is the intent to ensure all Council members have free and easy access to information from the City and ensure that such information is communicated completely, with candor and without bias. Individual Council members may not intervene in staff decision-making, the development of staff recommendations, scheduling of work, or executing department priorities without the prior knowledge and approval of the Council as a whole. This is necessary to protect staff from undue influence and pressure from individual Council members, and to allow staff to execute the priorities given by management and the Council without fear of reprisal.

The whole Council retains power to accept, reject, amend, influence, or otherwise guide and direct staff actions, decisions, recommendations, service levels, workloads and schedules, departmental priorities, and the performance of City business. If a Council member wishes to influence the actions, decisions, recommendations, workloads, work schedule, and priorities of staff, the Council member must prevail upon the Council to do so as a matter of Council policy.

Should Council members become dissatisfied about a department, they should address it with the City Manager, not the department head. Concerns about a department or any staff must be taken only to the City Manager; but if not addressed adequately by the City Manager then the City Council should review the issue in an appropriate performance review process of the City Manager.

(a) Access to Information.

Individual Council members, as well as the Council shall receive the full cooperation and candor of staff in being provided with any requested information. The City Manager or designee will inform the Council when a critical or unusual event occurs about which the public would be concerned.

To ensure proper responsiveness, Council members are asked to “cc” both the department head and the City Manager on all correspondence with staff. There are limited restrictions when information cannot be provided. Draft documents (e.g., staff reports in progress, administrative draft EIRs) under review are not available for release until complete and after review by City management. In addition, there are legal restrictions on the City’s ability to release certain personnel information even to members of the Council. Certain aspects of police affairs (access to restricted or confidential information related to crimes) may not be available to Council Members.

Council Members have a responsibility in this information flow as well. Council Members should come to meetings well prepared – having read staff reports and attachments and 319

Page | 17

requesting in advance any necessary and available information from staff. If a Council Member has questions on any agenda item, that member should preferably contact the City Manager prior to the meeting in order to allow staff time to research a response for the meeting.

(b) Interactions with Staff.

The Council recognizes the primary functions of staff as serving the community, executing Council policy and actions, and in keeping the Council informed. Staff is obligated to take guidance and direction only from the Council as a whole or from the appropriate management supervisors. Staff is directed to report to the City Manager any communication with a Council member, other than social communication. Staff is also directed to report to the City Manager any attempts by individual Council Members to unduly direct or otherwise pressure them into making, changing, or otherwise influencing recommendations.

Council Members shall request research and analytical work or give direction only to the City Manager or the City Attorney, requests for general information not involving significant staff time that can be verbally provided or copied, may be requested from City Department Heads. City staff will make every effort to respond in a timely and professional manner, as directed by the City manager, to all requests made by individual Council Members for information or assistance; provided that, the request is not of a magnitude, either in terms of workload, or more than two (2) hours total staff time, or policy, which would require that it would be more appropriately assigned to staff through the direction of the whole Council. If a request by an individual Council member is determined to take over two hours or more of staff time to complete, that request will be included on a Council agenda for Council discussion and direction.

The Manager receives an exception for additional use of staff time beyond the standard 2-hour rule only for the following:
• State of the City
• Town Hall meetings
• Welcome speeches at events
• Preparation for media interviews
• Promotional or official Managerial correspondence
• Advertorials (Palm Springs Life)
• Crisis communications

City officials recognize that Council work cannot be fully conducted at Council Meetings.

The responsibility of the City Manager is to conduct the day-to-day affairs of the City 320

Page | 18

consistent with established Council policy and does not permit Council Members to direct the activities of Golf Resort staff, and City partners. Requests which involve Council policy, expenditure of funds, research or analytical work, or use of more than two hours of total time shall be submitted to the full Council. To avoid misdirection of requests and inefficient use of Golf Resort staff, and City partners time, Council members shall submit all their requests to the City Manager. In the absence of the City Manager, requests should be made to the City manager designee.

Specific Council requests made requiring more than two hours total, shall require direction to the City Manager given only by a majority of the Council, at a City Council meeting.

Requests for information will not burden staff and will be primarily shared with the City Manager at regular meetings between the Council Members and the City Manager.

(d) Interactions with City Attorney.

The City Attorney is the legal advisor for the Council, City manager and departments. It is important to note that the City Attorney does not represent individual Council members or staff, but the City’s interest. Accordingly, except for conflict-of-interest inquiries, in questions involving pending or upcoming matters, or protocol and procedure, the City Attorney’s services are engaged and directed through the majority of the Council.

2.03.090 MAGNITUDE OF INFORMATION REQUEST.

Any information, service-related request, or revised policy position perceived as necessary by an individual Council Member, and that cannot be fulfilled based on the above guidelines, should be submitted by the individual Council Member in writing to the whole Council.

When raised at a Council meeting, the full Council can decide whether and when to agendize the request for further consideration. The City Manager will seek necessary clarification as to whether the Council desires staff research or a report prepared; and, if so, the relative priority that should be given to such a request considering other priorities and potential workload impacts.

321

Page | 19

CHAPTER 2.04

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITES OF COUNCIL MEMBERS

Sections:

2.04.010 Overview.

2.04.020 Expectations of Manager

2.04.010 OVERVIEW.

All members of the Council, including those serving as Mayor and Manager Pro Tem, have equal votes. No Council Member has more power than any other Council Member, and all should be treated with equal respect.

Council members are expected to:

Fully participate in Council meetings and other public forums while demonstrating respect, consideration, and courtesy to all.

Prepare in advance of Council meetings and be familiar with issues on the agenda.

Be respectful of other people’s time, stay focused and act efficiently during public meetings.

Represent the City at ceremonial functions at the request of the Manager (provided that any Council Member may attend).

Provide contact information to the Council’s Executive Assistant in case an emergency or urgent situation arises while the Council member is out of town.

Participate in scheduled activities to increase team effectiveness.

2.04.020 EXPECTATIONS OF THE MAYOR.

Council Members expectations of the Mayor are as follows:

 As presiding officer, maintains order, decorum, and the fair and equitable treatment of all speakers in front of the Council.
 Keeps discussion and questions focused on the specific agenda item under consideration.

 Makes parliamentary ruling with advice from the City Attorney. Chair rulings may be overturned if a Council Member makes a motion as an individual and the majority of the Council votes to overrule the chair.
322

Page | 20

 Leads the Council into an effective, cohesive working team.  Determines theme and venue for annual State of the City event.  Recommends Council ad-hoc committees and members, as appropriate, for formal Council approval at a City Council meeting.
 Serves as the liaison between the Council and the City Manager and City Attorney regarding employee relations
 Serves as the official City delegate to the League of Cities annual conference.  The Council may designate the Mayor to administer counseling, verbal reprimands and written warning to commission, committee or board members, and call for investigations of commission, committee or board member conduct.

323

Page | 21

CHAPTER 2.05

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

Sections:

2.05.010 Overview

2.05.020 E-mail

2.05.030 Ex Parte Communication

2.05.040 Election Period Prohibition

2.05.010 OVERVIEW.

The most fundamental role of a Council Member is communication with the public to assess community opinions and needs, and with staff to provide policy direction. Because the Council performs as a body (that is, acting based on the will of the majority as opposed to individuals), it is important that general guidelines be understood when speaking as a Council Member. Equally important, when Council Members are expressing personal views and not those of the Council, the public should be so advised.

Any writing including but not limited to letters, memoranda, and any electronic communications (email, text, tweets, etc.) involving Council Members, the subject of which relates to the conduct of government or the performance of any governmental function, with a few exceptions as outlined in the Public Records Act, are public records.

As such, the public or media can request disclosure of such communications by filing a records request with the City Clerk’s office.

2.05.020 EMAIL.

Avoiding Serial Meetings: While email facilitates efficient communication between Council members and City staff, the use of email also raises important legal issues to which Council Members must pay special attention.

“The Brown Act provides that ‘[a] majority of the members of a legislative body shall not, outside a meeting ... use a series of communications of any kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.’” (Open & Public V: A Guide to the Ralph M. Brown Act, p. 21, emphasis added.) Note that the terms discuss, deliberate, and take action each requires a dialogue or joint action. “A unilateral written communication to the legislative body … does not violate the Brown Act.” (Ibid., p. 22, emphasis added.)

Therefore, Council Members must be especially careful when communicating by email because the ease of using the “reply all” button may inadvertently result in a Brown Act violation. (The violation occurs not with the initial unilateral communication from one 324

Page | 22

Council member to others on the Council, but in the response, when it becomes discussion or deliberation.) Therefore, as a best practice, Council Members should not email more than one of their colleagues either as direct recipients or as “CC” recipients. Should a Council Member inadvertently include multiple colleagues as direct or “CC” recipients, the sender may follow up with a brief email, by “BCC” to the recipient members, acknowledging the mistake and warning them not to “Reply to All.” Council members are encouraged to contact the Fair Political Practices Commissions in the case of serious violations.

Personal Views: Using a City email account to express personal views without identifying them as such can cause confusion. To avoid potential confusion that that might cause, members of the Council should include the following disclaimer when using a City email account to send communications that express personal views:

• The views expressed in this email are those of the sender alone, acting and communicating individually. They do not necessarily represent the official views of the City of Indian Wells.

2.05.030 EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS

An ex parte communication is a written or oral communication between a Council Member and an interested individual concerning any issue in a formal proceeding other than procedural matters that does not occur in a public forum. It is the duty of each Council Member to publicly disclose ex parte communications that are relevant to a matter under consideration by the Council.

2.05.040 ELECTION COMMUNICATIONS

If the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or Council member are seeking re-election, and are engaged in their City Council roles, they should not be placing photos or likenesses in City buildings during the election period, which is sixty (60) days prior to Election Day. Unfair advantage over the other candidates may be perceived.

The City of Indian Wells is committed to open, honest communication with residents, businesses, City employees, and visitors. The City’s communication procedures provides best-practice guidance to City staff about communication activities during an election.

Within the sixty (60) calendar days preceding a general or special municipal election scheduled to occur in the City, no written newsletter or similar communication request made by the Council, any individual Council Member, or any candidate for City Council at the upcoming election, shall be issued by the City staff to City residents, in either physical or electronic form. Examples of said communication include letters from the Mayor.

325

Page | 23

Notwithstanding the above, communications related to emergency notifications, development and planning of programs, and services necessary to the successful completion and implementation of these activities are a priority to the City and shall continue during the election period. To that end, during the sixty (60) calendar day pre- election period, the City Manager, or his or her designee, may issue the following to City residents:
1) Any communication issued by the City to a City resident in the normal course of City business; including bills or charges for City services, reservations of City facilities, monthly police activity reports, notifications of special events or other promotional programs (e.g., Coffee with a Cop, Shred Event, Resident Celebrations, etc.), calls for City services, agendas and legal notices, provided that no content is included within the communication at the request of the City Council, any individual Council Member or any candidate for City Council at the upcoming election; or 2) An edition of the City’s quarterly newsletter, provided it is published in accordance with the City’s regular publication schedule and procedure and no content is included within the newsletter at the request of the City Council, any individual Council Member, or any candidate for City Council at the upcoming election; or
3) A communication to inform City residents about an emergency or time- sensitive matter if, in the City Manager’s judgment:

a) Because of the emergency or time sensitivity, issuance of the communication cannot be delayed until after the election; and b) The emergency/time sensitive communication is not being issued, in whole or in part, at the request of the City Council, any individual Council member or any candidate for City Council at the upcoming election.

This policy does not prohibit the City from issuing any written communication to City residents outside of the sixty (60) calendar day pre-election period, provided the communication otherwise complies with applicable law.

This policy does not apply to any written communication issued by public agencies outside of the City, campaign committees, private individuals or by private organizations.

However, privately funded communication issued during a pending election may be regulated by the California Political Reform Act and authors are directed to consult the Act for more information.

326

Page | 24

CHAPTER 2.06

USE OF CITY PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT OR RESOURCES

Sections:

2.06.010 Overview.

2.06.020 Non-City Business.

2.06.030 City Manager Authorization.

2.06.040 Individual Council Member’s Request.

2.06.050 Council Business.

2.06.010 OVERVIEW.

The City has many complex services, programs and projects being carried out at the direction of the Council. The orderly management and control of these programs, and projects are essential to the effective and efficient accomplishment of these efforts. The Council’s role is to provide policy direction and the City Manager is to organize and carry out the policies. Effective management and control require the Council and professional staff to maintain their needed roles. The following rules and procedures are designed to help assure the clear direction and efficiency of City operations.

2.06.020 NON-CITY BUSINESS.

State law prohibits the use of City personnel for any personal use or personal business activity not related to City business by any elected or appointed official.

2.06.030 CITY MANAGER AUTHORIZATION.

The use of City personnel for outside activities related to City business, such as JPA's or community groups, by an individual Council Member shall be authorized by the City Manager, and at his discretion, by the Council. Prior to volunteering or encouraging the use of staff for an issue of a Council committee, ad hoc committee, neighborhood meeting, regional board, or the board of another jurisdiction, a Council Member will confer with the City Manager, the latter of whom shall determine if it conf’. orms to Council policy or if it is necessary to present the request for staff use to the Council at a City Council meeting.

2.06.040 INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL MEMBER’S REQUEST.

Council Members shall make their requests for services or information to the City Manager and not directly to individual member of the City staff, Golf Resort Staff, and City partners.

The use of City staff to respond to an individual Council member’s requests for any purpose that exceed more than two hours of total staff time must be approved by the majority vote 327

Page | 25

of the Council. The individual Council member may make their request orally or in writing to the City Manager. The City Manager shall provide an estimate of the cost and how the request affects the Council’s goals and projects. This request will then be considered by the Council at a City Council meeting.

2.06.050 COUNCIL BUSINESS.

All communication with the City, the Council or individual Council members shall be considered the business of the City Any response by an individual Council member shall be identified as an individual response and not reflective of any position of the City or the Council.

328

Page | 26

CHAPTER 2.07

CODE OF ETHICS AND CONFLICT OF INTERST
Sections:

2.07.010 AB 1234 Ethics Training.

2.07.020 Political Reform Act.

2.07.030 Identifying Conflicts.

2.07.040 Nepotism.

2.07.010 AB 1234 ETHICS TRAINING.

The Council is subject to professional code of ethics trainings. City officials are required to be impartial and responsible in the fulfillment of their duties. State law (California Government Code / 53235, et seq.) requires public officials to complete two hours of training in ethics principles and laws every two years.

Council Member compliance with the required state law trainings will be reviewed and reported annually at a regular meeting of the Council. Council Members are required to stay compliant during their time on the Council. Council Members that are not in compliance at the annual review must complete the training within 30-days after the review and must report on the completion at a subsequent meeting of the Council. A persistent violation of the statutory ethics-training requirement can result in the removal of Council member assignments.

2.07.020 POLITICAL REFORM ACT; CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

The Political Reform Act of 1974 (“PRA”) is the principal law in California governing conflicts of interest for public officials. The Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”) is the state agency that administers the PRA, issues regulations, gives conflict advice, and enforces the rules.

The PRA prohibits public officials from making, participating in the making, or in any attempting to use their official position to influence a decision in which they know or have reason to know they have a financial interest. The City Attorney encourages each Council member to contact the City Attorney with any questions regarding the application of these laws. If the determination is that there is a conflict of interest, the Council member shall abstain from any participation in the decision

City officials should avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest to ensure that City decisions are made in an independent and impartial manner. Every elected official, officer, appointee, employee, consultant, or contract personnel of the City shall disclose completely the nature and extent of any interest, direct or indirect, which conflicts with his/her responsibility or duty.
329

Page | 27

2.07.030 IDENTIFYING CONFLICTS.

It is the responsibility of each Council Member to identify, disclose and declare his or her conflict before the matter is heard by the Council. If possible, the conflicted Council member should notify the City Clerk’s office prior to the Council meeting at which the matter will be heard to ensure the presence of a quorum. The City Clerk’s office assists only in the filing of conflict-of-interest forms and does not provide any interpretations of the FFPC regulations.

2.07.040 NEPOSTISM.

The Council’s appointment of relatives to a City Commission, Committee, or Board or any City employee’s hiring, promoting, or transferring of a relative may cause conflicts of interest and serve as the basis for complaints concerning disparate treatment and favoritism as well as violations of the state’s Ethics statute. In addition, no Council shall use his or her position as a City Council to obtain or provide information, access, or anything else of value with the intent or effect of benefiting his or her relative, where such benefit is not available to the public generally.

(a) City Committee, Commissions, and Boards:

The City Council shall not appoint any relatives to City Committee, Commissions and Boards. Such appointments have the potential for adversely impacting the safety, security, morale or efficiency of the City Council, its professional responsibilities, or the smooth functioning of the legislative body, by creating an actual or potential conflict of interest, or the appearance of a conflict of interest. To protect the Council against such conflicts and complaints, and to provide for the ethical and legally consistent treatment of individuals with relatives seeking appointment by the City Council, such appointments are prohibited. To the extent relatives of Council members appointed prior to the adoption of this policy, shall vacate their position upon the Council assuming office. If any existing member of a City Commission, Committee, or Board, who’s relative as defined above, is hereafter elected to the City Council, the member of the City Commission, Committee, or Board, shall resign his or her position upon the assumption of office by the relative Council member.

(b) Council Relatives

In addition, it shall be the policy of the City that relatives of elected and appointed officials, department heads, and any other City employee shall 330

Page | 28

not be hired, promoted, or transferred into positions in which one relative may supervise, directly 1 or indirectly 2, any other relative, or work in a capacity which would allow an employee to evaluate or control the terms, conditions, or performance circumstances of employment of a relative. This prohibition shall apply to all full and part-time regular employees, elected and appointed officials, all temporary employees, and all individuals working for the City through a temporary services agency.

For purposes of this policy, “relative” shall be defined by blood or marriage or registered domestic partnership 3 to include the following:

Spouse 4, Child/Stepchild, Parent/Stepparent, Grandparent, Grandchild, Brother/Sister Stepbrother/Stepsister, Aunt/Uncle, Niece/Nephew, Parent-in-law, Brother-in-law/Sister- in-law, Legal guardian, Person with whom one is a Bona Fide Dating Relationship5 Relatives shall also include persons who fall into the above categories by a previous marriage, adoption, half-relatives, and step-relatives.

In the employment context, the employee is responsible for immediately notifying his or her department head of an impending or existing relationship covered under this policy with another employee with the same department, or with an appointed or elected official of the City. In the case of reporting by the City Manager or City Attorney, he or she shall report directly to the City Council. The department head shall report directly to the City Manager. Failure to promptly notify the department head of an impending or existing relationship as defined under this policy may be grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including termination, or disqualification from employment or promotion.

Except in the case of a potential violation of this policy by the City Manager or the City Attorney, the City Manager shall determine whether the employment, promotion, or transfer of an employee has the potential for creating an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, morale, or involves potential conflicts of interest. If the City Manager determines that such potential does exist, the Human Resources Director in consultation with the affected employee(s) will attempt to resolve the situation through the transfer of one or both employees to alleviate the conflict. If accommodations are not feasible,

1 Defined as when one employee is responsible for the day-to-day supervision and direction of another employee. The direct supervisor is the person who assigns, prioritizes, and evaluates the employee’s work.
2 Defined as when a relative is hired, promoted, or transferred into the chain of command of another relative, and one of the individuals has management or supervisory responsibilities in the division or section in which both would work even if the relative would not directly supervise or interact with the newly hired, promoted, or transferred employee.
3 As defined in California Family Code § 297.
4 As defined in Family Code § 300.
5 As used in CCR, Title 2, Division 6, § 18942(18)(A).
331

Page | 29

the Human Resources Director in consultation with the affected employee(s) will determine which employee must resign to resolve the conflict.

The City reserves the right to exercise appropriate managerial judgement to take such actions as may be necessary to achieve the intent of this policy. The City reserves the right to vary from the outlined in this policy to address unusual circumstances on a case- by-case basis.

332

Page | 30

CHAPTER 2.08

DISTRIBUTION OF CITY-CONTROLLED TICKETS TO CITY OFFICIALS

Sections:

2.08.010 Purpose and Application of Policy.

2.08.020 Definitions.

2.08.030 General Provisions.

2.08.040 Ticket Administrator.

2.08.050 Official Duties and Ceremonial Roles.

2.08.060 Specific Governmental or Public Purpose for Ticket Distribution.

2.08.070 Tickets Distributed at the Behest of a City Official

2.08.080 Public Purposes Related to BNP Paribas Open.

2.08.090 Public Purposes Related to City Sponsored Events.

2.08.100 Disclosure Requirements.

2.08.110 Annual Review of Ticket and Campaign Contributions

2.08.010 PURPOSE AND APPLICATION OF POLICY.

The purpose of this Policy is to ensure that all Tickets distributed by the City are issued in furtherance of a valid governmental and/or public purpose of the City as required under Section 18944.1 of the Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”) regulations. This Policy applies to Tickets which provide admission to an Event. This Policy shall be applicable to every officer, agent and employee of the City who is obligated to file an Annual Statement of Economic Interests (FPPC Form 700) under state law or the City’s current Conflict of Interest Code.

This Policy only applies to the benefits the City Official receives by the admission and are not applicable to any other item of value provided. This Policy does not generally apply to political or nonprofit fundraisers which are governed under a separate policy. This Policy also does not apply to Tickets provided directly to or earmarked for the City Official or a certain class of City Officials.

2.08.020 DEFINITIONS.

Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, words and terms used in this Policy shall have the same meaning as that ascribed to such words and terms in the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., as the same may be amended from time to time) and the FPPC regulations (Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, section 18110 et seq., as the same may be amended from time to time).

333

Page | 31

“City” shall mean and refer to the City of Indian Wells and any other affiliated agency created or activated by the Indian Wells City Council.

“City Official” shall mean and refer to every member, elected officer, appointed officer, employee, or consultant of the City, as that term is defined by Government Code Section 82048 and FPPC Regulation 18701. This term shall include, without limitation, any City board, commission or committee member or other appointed official or employee required to file an annual Statement of Economic Interests (FPPC Form 700). For the purposes of this Policy, this term shall also include a spouse serving a public purpose by accompanying a City Official to an Event and thereby serving as an ambassador of the City.

“Event” shall mean an event, show or performance for entertainment, amusement, recreational or similar purpose for which a Ticket is required to gain admission.

“FPPC” shall mean and refer to the California Fair Political Practices Commission.

“Immediate Family” shall mean and refer to spouse and dependent children as defined in Government Code section 82029.

“Policy” shall mean and refer to this “Ticket Distribution Policy.”

“Spouse” shall mean a husband or wife, domestic partner, similar significant other or any person with whom a Councilmember is in a bona fide dating relationship, as that term is used in FPPC Regulation 18942(18)(A).

“Ticket” shall mean and refer to a “ticket and/or pass” to an Event.

“Ticket Administrator” shall mean and refer to the City Manager or his/her designee.”

2.08.030 GENERAL PROVISIONS.

1) No Right to Tickets: The use of a Ticket is a privilege extended by the City and not the right of any person to which the privilege may from time to time be extended.

2) Limitation on Transfer of Tickets: Tickets distributed to City Officials pursuant to this Policy shall not be transferred to any other person, except to members of such City Official’s immediate family or no more than one guest solely for their attendance at the event. Under no circumstances may either the City Official or a member of his or her immediate family sell or further transfer any Ticket provided under this Policy.

3) Return of Tickets: Any City Official may return any Ticket unused to the City for redistribution pursuant to this Policy.
334

Page | 32

4) Prohibition Against Sale of or Receiving Reimbursement for Tickets: No individual who receives a Ticket pursuant to this Policy shall sell or receive reimbursement for the value of the Ticket.

5) No Earmarking of Ticket Given to City: No Ticket gratuitously provided to the City by an outside source and distributed by the City to, or at the behest of, a City Official pursuant to this Policy shall be earmarked by the original source for use by a particular City Official or a specific class of City Officials.

6) Limitation on Use: Any ticket or pass is deemed to serve a public purpose if distributed to a City Official, other than an elected official, for the City Official’s personal use in order to support general employee morale, to encourage retention, or to reward public service, if the ticket or pass is acquired by the City: (i) pursuant to a contract to use public property, (ii) because the City controls the event, or (iii) by purchase at fair market value. For purposes of this paragraph, "personal use" means use by the City Official, his or her family, or no more than one guest.

Nothing in this section limits the receipt, distribution, and behest of tickets or passes by elected officials for any of the other public purposes stated in Section

2.10.060.

2.08.040 TICKET ADMINISTRATOR.

a) Designation of Ticket Administrator: The City Manager or his/her designee shall be the “Ticket Administrator” for purposes of implementing the provisions of this Policy.

b) Authority: The Ticket Administrator has the sole authority, in his or her discretion, to establish procedures for the distribution of Tickets supplemental to and in accordance with this Policy. All requests for tickets from City Officials which fall within the scope of the Policy shall be made in accordance with the procedures established by the Ticket Administrator.

c) Implementation of Policy: The Ticket Administrator or his or her designee is hereby designated as having primary responsibility for distributing Tickets in his or her discretion to a reasonable number of City Officials in a manner that will best serve the City’s interests and to persons whose attendance at a particular Event serves a specific governmental or public purpose.

d) Revoking/Suspending Ticket Privileges: The Ticket Administrator, in his or her sole discretion, may revoke or suspend the Ticket privileges of any person who violates any provision of this Policy or the procedures established by the Ticket Administrator for the distribution of Tickets in accordance with this Policy. 335

Page | 33

e) Attendance: If available, the Ticket Administrator shall attend all events to which the City obtains control of Tickets as the City’s primary staff representative.

2.08.050 OFFICIAL DUTIES AND CEREMONIAL ROLES.

Tickets provided to City Officials as part of their official duties, or Tickets provided so that the City Official can perform a Ceremonial Role must be reported on FPPC Form 802.

2.08.060 SPECIFIC GOVERNMENTAL OR PUBLIC PURPOSE FOR TICKET DISTRIBUTION.

The City Council has determined that there are certain times where a City Official’s attendance serves a valid public purpose which benefits the City. The following is a list of the type of reasons which meet this requirement. The list is intended to be illustrative rather than exhaustive. The City may provide Tickets to or at the behest of a City Official for Events which serve any of the following public or governmental purposes:

a) Promote, evaluate, and provide management and/or official oversight of City- controlled, sponsored or supported events, activities, or community programs at City venues, including but not limited to evaluation of the venue, quality of performance and compliance with City policies, agreements, and other requirements.

b) Support sponsorship agreements involving Events where the City specifically seeks to enhance the City’s reputation both locally and regionally by serving as hosts or sponsors providing the necessary opportunities to meet and greet visitors, dignitaries, residents and guests.

c) Where the City, as a form on consideration for a written contract, has required that a certain number of Tickets be made available for City use.

d) Promote local and regional businesses, economic development and tourism activities within the City, including conventions and conferences.

e) Enhance City recognition, visibility, and/or profile on a local, state, national or worldwide scale.

f) Foster open government by City Official appearances, participation and/or availability at business and/or community events.

g) Improve intergovernmental relations by encouraging the members of the City Council, City staff, and their guests, where appropriate, to attend functions and events with the public officials of other entities, thereby fostering an open dialogue and better 336

Page | 34

understanding of intergovernmental issues.

h) Increase public exposure to, and awareness of, the various public recreational, cultural, community and education facilities available to the public within the City.

i) Promote business activity with the City and/or highlight the achievements of local residents and businesses.

j) Promote business growth and development within the City, including economic development and job creation opportunities.

k) Facilitate outreach and recognition programs for veterans, teachers, emergency services, medical personnel, community organizations and other civil service occupations.

l) Encourage or reward significant academic, athletic, or public service achievements by Indian Wells students, residents, or businesses.

m) Promote community resources and private facilities, including charitable and nonprofit organizations facilities, available for use by City residents.

n) Promote, support and/or show appreciation for programs and services rendered by non-profit organizations benefiting Indian Wells residents.

o) Encourage volunteers to become members of City commissions, committees and boards and reward volunteer public service.

p) Attract and retain highly qualified employees in City service, recognize or reward meritorious service by a City employee, and/or promote enhanced City employee performance or morale.

q) The following is a non-exclusive list of specific business, community, and nonprofit Events in the City, where a City Official’s presence has been determined to serve a valid public purpose. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, but is merely illustrative of the types of Events where the distribution of tickets has been clearly authorized:

1. BNP Paribas Open

2. Desert Town Hall Lecture Series

3. Indian Wells Arts Festival

4. Doctor George Car Show

337

Page | 35

2.08.070 TICKETS DISTRIBUTED AT THE BEHEST OF A CITY OFFICIAL.

Only the following City Officials shall have the authority to behest tickets: City Council Members, City Manager and Department Heads.

Tickets shall be distributed at the behest of a City Official only for one or more public purposes set forth in section 2.08.060 above. If tickets are distributed at the behest of a City Official, such City Official shall not use one of the tickets so distributed to attend the Event.

2.08.080 PUBLIC PURPOSES RELATED TO BNP PARIBAS OPEN.

Participation by City Officials in the ticketed events and activities hosted by the BNP Paribas Open is important to provide an opportunity for City leaders to be involved in the City’s largest special event. By attending the two-week long activities, including the tournament, City Officials have the ability to meet and greet residents and visitors to the City. Moreover, City Officials are accountable for the funding and support that the City contributes to the BNP Paribas Open, and therefore some level of attendance during the tournament is necessary for City Officials to provide suggested improvements to Desert Champions LLC management staff and City staff that will enhance and improve the overall event and its economic and public impact on the City.

2.08.090 PUBLIC PURPOSES RELATED TO CITY SPONSORED EVENTS.

Participation by City Officials in events wherein the City has made a monetary contribution and/or is a named sponsor is important. Such events serve to enhance the image of the City as a world-class destination resort. These events provide the public with access to many distinguished public and civic leaders as well as significant cultural enhancement.

The active participation of City Officials at such events serves to attract additional resources and economic opportunities for this community. City Officials at such events represent the City in interacting with dignitaries and they meet and greet residents and visitors to the City. Moreover, City Officials are accountable for the funding and support that the City contributes to these events, and therefore some level of attendance is appropriate for City Officials to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the event and suggest ways in which events may be enhanced and improved to maximize the economic and public benefit to the City.

2.08.100 DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

It shall be the duty of the Ticket Administrator or his or her designee to ensure the City's compliance with Section 18944.1(d) of the California Code of Regulations pertaining to the reporting of the distribution of Tickets by a public agency to officials or officers of the 338

Page | 36

City. The City shall complete a record of a Ticket distributed under this Policy on FPPC Form 802, including all the information as required under Section 19844.1. The forms shall be maintained as a public record, be subject to inspection and copying under Section 81008(a), and be forwarded to the FPPC for posting on its website.

2.08.110 ANNUAL REVIEW OF TICKETS AND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

At the first regular meeting or special meeting of the Council following the annual reorganization, the Council, with the assistance of the City Attorney and City Staff, shall conduct a review of applicable law and City policies pertaining to: (a) the acceptance of gifts, (b) the City's acceptance and distribution of tickets to sports, entertainment, charity and similar events, and (c) reporting by Council Members of campaign contributions at Council meetings when there are agenda items directly involving contributors.

339

Page | 37

CHAPTER 2.09

PRESS RELATIONS

Sections:

2.09.010 Official Position of the City.

2.09.020 Press Releases.

2.09.030 Dealing with the Media.

2.09.040 Council Members Speaking on Their Own Behalf.

2.09.010 OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE CITY.

In responding to inquiries from the media, the Council shall represent the official position of the City and shall limit their comments to stating the facts and circumstances, without personal opinions or conclusions.

2.09.020 PRESS RELEASES.

All press releases pertaining to the City or the Council shall be issued on City letterhead on behalf of the entire Council. Press releases pertaining to the City or the Council can be released by the Mayor with prior authorization from the Council acting at a City Council meeting. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to make press releases pertaining to City activities and events of public importance as he determines necessary and appropriate to keep the public informed. When the City issues a press release, the Mayor is consulted in terms of any Council Member quotes or references. All press releases shall immediately be distributed to the Council.

2.09.030 DEALING WITH THE MEDIA.

When dealing with members of the media, it is usually the Mayor who represents the position and interest of the Council. When the City Manager or department heads are contacted, they will express the position of the Council. Council members, the City Manager and department heads are authorized to respond to the media.

2.09.040 COUNCIL MEMBERS SPEAKING ON THEIR OWN BEHALF.

The Council maintains open lines of communication with the media providing any Council Member the ability to speak with the media on issues. When speaking to the media, the Council Member will clarify whether they are speaking on behalf of the Council or themselves. No member shall hold themselves out as representing or speaking on behalf of the Council on any matter unless, prior thereto, the Council by majority vote taken during a duly noticed Council meeting, has authorized said member to act and/or speak on behalf of the entire Council. If a Council Member does not feel knowledgeable about an issue 340

Page | 38

when questioned by the media, they should direct the member of the media to the City Manager or designee. It is recommended that Council Members advise the City Manager when media contact occurs.

341

Page | 39

CHAPTER 2.10

CIVILITY GUIDELINES

Sections:

2.10.010 Overview.

2.10.020 Commitment to Civil Behavior.

2.10.030 Pledge of Civility.

2.10.040 Council Conduct and Relationship with Electors.

2.10.050 Council Member Conflicts.

2.10.010 OVERVIEW.

City officials are obligated to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California and to comply with Federal, State, and local laws and City policies. Recognizing the special responsibilities of serving the City and its citizens and customers, Council Members are required to maintain the highest standards of integrity and honesty, and they are expected to treat all members of the public and fellow City employees with respect, courtesy, concern and responsiveness. The conduct of Council in both their official and private affairs should be above reproach to assure that their City position is not used for personal gain.

2.10.020 COMMITMENT TO CIVIL BEHAVIOR.

The Council commits to civil behavior by maintaining a cohesive, productive working environment by:

1. Supporting the City's mission.

2. Bringing City issues to the attention of the Council as appropriate for discussion.

3. Offering alternative solution(s) when addressing a problem or issue.

4. Showing respect to each other as elected officials.

5. Showing respect toward City staff.

6. Promoting civility during Council meetings.

7. Maintaining the confidentiality of material discussed during closed session. Similarly, not disclosing the content or substance of confidential or privileged communications relating to City business. NOTE: Disclosure of confidential or privileged information without Council authorization is a serious violation of the Manual and may also violate applicable law.

8. Bringing any matter of criticism, disagreement, or conflict with a staff member(s) to the City Manager for resolution.

342

Page | 40

2.10.030 PLEDGE OF CIVILITY.

The manner in which we govern ourselves is often as important as the positions we take.

The City’s collective decisions will be better – and truer to our mission – when differing views have had the opportunity to be fully vetted and considered.

All those who appear before the Council have the right to be treated with respect, courtesy, and openness. The City values all input.

2.10.040 COUNCIL CONDUCT AND RELATIONSHIP TO ELECTORS.

The people elect Council Members to serve as representatives of all the people. Authority and responsibility for legislative enactments are vested in the Council. California follows the Council type of government where it is the function of the representatives to do that which in their best judgments is proper. California does not follow the "Town Meeting" type of government where the people legislate.

The responsibility of making decisions is not easy nor without its problems, but it is the responsibility of Council Members to vote and decide issues, regardless of personal hesitation. The purpose of government is to balance legally, fairly, and without favor the limitations, restrictions, or losses that are to be placed upon the individual or several individuals against the good, the benefit, or welfare of or to a majority of the people.

The electors have delegated to the Council the right, the power, and the duty to act; the same electors have reserved to themselves the rights of 1) petition, 2) election, 3) recall, 4) referendum, 5) initiative and 6) litigation.

2.10.050 POLICY ENFORCEMENT BY COUNCIL.

This policy manual applies only to sitting Council Members and may only be enforced by the Council as a body, by majority vote. Any Council Member who has evidence that a colleague on the council has committed a substantial violation of the policy manual may raise the issue during that Council Member’s comment period. The Council Member reporting the violation should be specific as to what exact provision of the policy manual has been violated and provide evidence to support the claim. The Council Member may move to add a Council discussion of the alleged violation to a future Council agenda. If the motion passes, the alleged violation may be discussed at the future meeting. The accused colleague will be given opportunity to speak during the council deliberation on the question. The Council as a body decides, by majority vote, what action, if any, is appropriate to take in response to the reported violation.

343

Page | 41

CHAPTER 2.11

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED INFORMATION

Sections:

2.11.010 Release of Attorney-Client Privileged Information.

2.11.010 RELEASE OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED INFORMATION.

Attorney-client privileged information includes all information transmitted in confidence between the City Attorney’s Office, on the one hand, and the City, Manager, Council, Department Heads, and Staff, on the other hand. The release of attorney-client privileged information is prohibited without the prior approval of the Council. Prior to the release of any attorney-client privileged information, the person considering the release must apprise the Council of the nature and scope of the release and obtain the Council’s formal approval.

Under unusual circumstances where it is not feasible or advisable to obtain Council approval due to the Council’s meeting schedule or other good cause, the City Manager may alone authorize release of attorney-client privileged information, provided that the City Manager then promptly informs Council of such release. Disclosure of privileged information without Council-majority or City Manager approval, in accordance with this paragraph, is a serious violation of the Manual and may also violate applicable law.

344

Page | 42

CHAPTER 2.12

COUNCIL FINANCIAL MATTERS
Sections:

2.12.010 Budget Expenditures.

2.12.010 BUDGET EXPENDITURES.

The Council establishes within the City budget for each fiscal year a specific sum of money, in an equal amount for each Council Member, available for use by the Council Member as a “City Official” and their accompanying “spouse” (as those terms are defined in Section 2.08.020) for a valid public purpose described in Section 2.89.060; provided that the specific use of such funds during the year for the ordinary and necessary expenses related to the foregoing duties shall receive prior City Council approval pursuant to Section 101 of the City Charter.

A staff report with the following required information will be placed on the City Council consent calendar on an as needed basis for pre-approval of Council Members’ event attendance:

• Description of the event including its sponsor, date, and location of event • Listing of Council Member/s attending the event
• Total cost for each Council Member (and “Spouse”) to attend the event • City governmental or public purpose for Council member attendance at event

With respect to travel expenses, reimbursement shall be permitted only for meals of Council Members, and the cost of alcohol shall not be reimbursed. Donations to organizations are not eligible for use of such funds. A Council Member may expend up to their individual budgeted annual appropriation for the foregoing purposes. After Council event approval, the City Manager and Finance Director shall monitor the amount of funds remaining available for use by each Council Member as the fiscal year progresses.

345

Page | 43

TITLE 3

LEGISLATIVE

346

Page | 44

TITLE 3 LEGISLATIVE

Chapters:

3.01 Meeting Schedule.

3.02 Rules of Decorum for Member of the Public at Meetings.

3.03 Commissions, Committees, and Boards.

3.04 Outside Organizations, Regional Authorizes & City Committees

3.05 Council Standing and Ad Hoc Committee’s.

CHAPTER 3.01

MEETING AGENDAS

Sections:

3.01.010 Meeting Schedule.

3.01.020 Criteria for Matters Covered.

3.01.030 Placing Items on Agenda.

3.01.040 Removal of Items on the Agenda.

3.01.050 Continuing of Agenda Items.

3.01.060 Communications Received After Agenda Distribution

3.01.010 MEETING SCHEDULE.

Regular meetings are held in the City Council Chambers, 44-950 Eldorado Drive, on the first and third Thursday of every month at 1:30 p.m.

From time to time, the Council may hold study sessions or workshops to give the Council a less formal and more interactive forum to discuss issues in advance of any official action to be taken. Staff often presents policy alternatives and is directly engaged in the dialogue.

While general direction or suggestions may be given to staff or to others in a study session, no formal action by the Council is taken in a study session unless it was anticipated and properly noticed and agendized before the meeting.

Regular Council and study session meetings are open to the public and are videotaped when held in the Council Chamber.

347

Page | 45

3.01.020 CRITERIA FOR MATTERS COVERED.

The Council only considers ordinances, resolutions, motions, proclamations, presentations, or matters which affect the conduct of the business of the City or its corporate powers or duties as a municipal corporation and the Council shall consider only ordinances, resolutions, or motions supporting or disapproving any legislation or action pending in the Legislature of the State of California, the Congress of the United States or before any officer or agency of said State or nation when such proposed legislation or action, if adopted, will affect the conduct of the municipal business or the powers and duties of the City or its officers or employees as such. Communications on matters not meeting these criteria shall be provided to the Council on an information basis only.

Public Input: The public, by law, has an opportunity to address the Council on any item of interest to the public that is within the jurisdiction of the Council, at the time the matter is heard. The Mayor has the right to establish a time limit on speakers and the total time allocated for a particular issue.

Public Disruptions: A portion or all of the public may be removed if willful disruption makes conducting the meeting “infeasible”; the media may remain unless they participate in the disruption.

3.01.030 PLACING ITEMS ON AGENDA.

A Council member may request an item be considered on a future agenda, verbally during a City Council meeting or by informing the City Manage. The request shall be submitted wherever reasonably possible at 14 calendar days in advance of a Council meeting. The item will be agendized at the next regularly scheduled meeting for consideration by the Council under the Council Reports section of the agenda with the initiating Council member’s name. The Council Member may, at their discretion, prepare a written report.

A member of the public may request that an item be placed on a future agenda during public comments or by submitting a written request to the City Manager.

Upon approval of a majority of the Council, the item will be agendized and a staff report may be prepared. The City Manager will inform the Council of the potential impact the request will have on established priorities or staff workload and seek approval by the Council prior to authorizing the work or scheduling the item as appropriate.

Emergency and non-agendized items may be added to an agenda only in accordance with State law. Emergency items are only those matters affecting public health or safety such as work stoppages, disasters, and other severe emergencies. Adding an emergency item requires a majority vote and are very rare. Non-agendized items are matters that come to the attention of the City after the agenda is posted. Non-agendized items may be added to the agenda only if the Council makes findings that 1) the need to consider the item arose 348

Page | 46

after the posting of the agenda, and 2) there is a need to take immediate action at this meeting of the Council. These findings must be approved by a 4/5 vote; if less than five members of the City Council are present, the findings require a unanimous vote of those present.

3.01.040 REMOVAL OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA.

Any Council member who requested an item be placed on the agenda can remove the item from the agenda 1) any time prior to the posting of the agenda or 2) at the City Council meeting during the approval of the final agenda. The requesting Council member may also request the item be “continued” and considered at a future City Council meeting. The City Manager may also request items be removed from the agenda with City Council consensus.

3.01.050 CONTINUING OF AGENDA ITEMS.

The majority of the Council can continue an item on the agenda due to applicant scheduling issues, staff requiring additional time to research an issue, or when insufficient time is available to address the matter thoroughly.

3.01.060 COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED AFTER AGENDA DISTRIBUTION.

All writings, documents, or electronic communications relating to any item on the agenda received after distribution of the Council agenda packet and prior to the Council meeting, shall be distributed by the City Clerk to the entire Council, made available for public inspection during normal business hours at City Hall in the agenda binder located in the lobby, and posted on the City’s website.

Residents providing writings or documents to the Council during the meeting should present ten (10) copies to the City Clerk for distribution and placing in the official record.

349

Page | 47

CHAPTER 3.02

RULES OF DECORUM FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AT MEETINGS

Sections:

3.02.010 Purpose.

3.02.020 Public Meeting Decorum.

3.02.030 Addressing the Council.

3.02.040 Values of Respect.

3.02.050 Enforcement of Order.

3.02.010 PURPOSE.

This policy establishes rules of decorum for members of the public attending and/or addressing the Council at a meeting held in the Council Chamber or conference room. The policy is intended to facilitate the conduct of public meetings in an open and orderly manner and in an environment safe for all persons in attendance.

All persons are expected to conduct themselves with civility and courtesy. All persons giving comments shall speak directly to the Council and address issues, not individuals.

3.02.020 PUBLIC MEETING DECORUM.

Persons in the audience will refrain from using cellular phones and/or pagers while the meeting is in session, and refrain from behavior which will disrupt the public meeting. This will include making loud noises, clapping, shouting, booing, hissing, or engaging in any other activity in a manner that disturbs, disrupts, or impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting; refrain from creating, provoking, or participating in any type of disturbance involving unwelcome physical contact.

Appropriate attire, including shoes and shirts are always required in the Council Chamber and conference room. No food, drink (other than bottled water with a cap) or chewing gum will be allowed in the Council Chamber and conference room.

3.02.030 ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL

Persons wishing to speak on an agenda item or during public comments are asked to complete a speaker blue card and submit the card to the City Clerk or other staff at the meeting. Speakers should discuss topics related to City business on the agenda unless they are speaking during public comments within the Council’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Speaker’s comments should be addressed to the full body. Requests to engage the Mayor in conversation will not be honored. Abusive language is inappropriate and not allowed.

Speakers and any other member of the public will not approach the dais during the meeting 350

Page | 48

without prior consent from the Mayor. Speakers should return to their seat after their comments and not continue to stand at the podium.

When the Mayor has recognized speakers, they shall come forward to the lectern and state their name and City of residence for the record. Any documents used by the speaker shall be given to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council. A three-minute limit is the policy of the Council; however, the time limit is at the discretion of the Council.

Applicants and appellants, especially in land use matters are given more time to speak.

Whenever any group of persons wishes to address the Council on the same subject matter, it shall be proper for the Mayor to request that a spokesperson be chosen by the group to address the body and, to limit the number of persons so addressing the body to avoid unnecessary repetition.

After the Mayor has announced the public comments, portion is done, or a motion has been made, or a public hearing has been closed, no member of the public shall address the Council from the audience on the matter under consideration without first securing permission to do so by a majority of the Council.

Speakers can submit written public comments to the City Clerk preferably 24 hours prior to the distribution of the agenda packet. The written public comments will be included in the agenda packet, the speaker can summarize his/her written comments within the three- minute time limit at the meeting. Any written comments on an agenda item received by the City Clerk prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Council and then included in the official record of the meeting.

3.02.040 VALUES OF RESPECT.

The Council has also recognized the importance of approaching the public’s business in an environment of personal respect and courtesy, which places emphasis on the consideration of policy and avoids personalization of comments. Some guidelines utilized by the Council include:
a. Discussion should focus on policy matters.

b. Personal criticism of elected officials or other individuals is discouraged.

c. Proper decorum should be displayed as other members express their views.

d. Treat member of the public equally, applying rules in fair and consistent manner

351

Page | 49

3.02.050 ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER.

The Police Chief or his designees acts as the Sergeant-At-Arms. Any Council Member may request the Mayor to enforce the rules of protocol. Upon motion and majority vote, the Mayor shall be required to do so.

352

Page | 50

CHAPTER 3.03

COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS

Sections:

3.03.010 Introduction.

3.03.020 Council Relationship with Commissions, Committees and Boards.

3.03.030 Role of Ex-Officio Member.

3.03.040 Work Plan.

3.03.050 Appointment of Resident Members.

3.03.060 Membership of Current Commissions, Committees and Boards.

3.03.070 Policy for Selection and Appointment of Resident Members.

3.03.080 Simultaneous Service Prohibition.

3.03.090 Annual Review of Commission, Committee and Board Relevance.

3.03.010 INTRODUCTION.

The Council shall establish such commissions, committees, and boards as it deems appropriate to provide recommendations. Committees may be either standing committees, or ad hoc committees established by the Council from time to time. Each Commission, Committee, and Board shall be advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the resolution or motion establishing the Commission, Committee, or Board, and shall be established by a specific resolution or motion with its purpose, duties, and number of members defined by the resolution or motion. In addition, the Council periodically appoints persons other than Council Members to certain outside organizations or regional authorities listed in Section 3.04.010. Such outside organizations and regional authorities shall be governed by their own policies.

3.03.020 COUNCIL RELATIONSHIP WITH COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS.

Council Members must recognize that it is important for Commissioners and Committee members to be able to make objective recommendations on items related to the City.

Council Members must be certain that any opinions expressed to members of Commissions and Committees are clearly identified as individual personal opinions, unless official Council action has been taken on the subject in question.

The Council has determined that Council Members should not lobby Commissioners, Committee, or Board Members for votes. However, Council Members may attend meetings in their unofficial capacity as residents and request that Commissioners, Committee, or Board Members consider certain issues during their deliberations or may do so in unusual instances in their capacity as Council Members to reflect the views of 353

Page | 51

the Council as a body. Council Members should not engage in advocacy before a Commissioners, Committee, or Board on any matter which will likely thereafter come before the Council at a public hearing.

Council Members choosing to attend Commission, Committee, or Board meetings should be sensitive to the fact that they are not participating members of the body. Council Members have the rights, and only the rights, of ordinary citizens with respect to Commission, Committee, or Board– including the right to write to and speak to the Commission, Committee, or Board during public comment periods.

3.03.030 ROLE OF EX-OFFICIO MEMBER.

Members of the Council are assigned to serve in an ex-officio capacity to various City Committees. The purpose of the ex-officio assignment is to facilitate communication between the Council and the advisory body and to help to increase the Council’s familiarity with the membership, programs, and issues of the advisory body. In fulfilling their ex- officio assignment, Council Members will attend Committee meetings to observe the activities and maintain communication with the Committee.

Ex-officio members should be sensitive to the fact they are non-voting members of the Committee. Being an ex-officio member bestows no special right with respect to the Commission, Committee or Board business.

3.03.040 WORK PLAN.

All programs, projects, funding, and staffing requests must be approved by the Council.

The work plan of every Commission, Committee and Board shall include those items under their purview along with any additional duties or assignments delegated to the body by the City Council.

3.03.050 APPOINTMENT OF RESIDENT MEMBERS.

Resident members of each Commission, Committee, or Board, shall be appointed by the Council during a regular or special meeting of the Council. The terms of all appointees shall expire on June 30. Appointees shall take office on July 1.

Council recommendations of resident members to outside organizations and regional authorities, shall be made during a regular or special meeting of the City Council. Resident terms on outside organization and regional authorities shall be subject to the policies and procedures of such outside organizations and regional authorities.

354

Page | 52

3.03.060 MEMBERSHIP OF CURRENT COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS.

Current City standing Commission, Committee, and Board subject to appointment procedures of this Chapter 3.03 are:

Planning Commission 5 Members
Marketing Committee 12 Members 6 including 2 Councilmembers Community Activities Committee 6 Members including 1 Councilmember Golf Resort Advisory Committee 7 Members including 2 Councilmember Grants-in-Aid Committee 6 Members including 1 Councilmember

Current outside organizations or regional authorities are subject to selection procedures of this Chapter 3.03 and subject to appointment and terms governed by the relevant outside organization/regional authorities’ policies and procedures:

Joslyn Senior Center Board Either 1 Council Member or other Indian Wells resident

Coachella Valley Mosquito Either 1 Council Member or other Indian Wells resident & Vector Control

Palm Springs International Airport Regional Commission Either 1 Council Member or other Indian Wells resident

3.03.070 POLICY FOR SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT OF RESIDENT MEMBERS.

In order to secure broad and knowledgeable representation on the City's Commission, Committee, and Board it is desirable that a standard policy be formulated for selection to these bodies.

6 Marketing Committee membership includes local hotels and resorts, Indian Wells Golf Resort, and other City partners. Membership of the Marketing Committee fluctuates based on participation from these partners.

355

Page | 53

(a) Eligibility Criteria.

All members of a Commission, Committee or Board shall be residents of the City, with a must be a minimum age of 18, unless an exception is provided by the Council. Also, the membership of such bodies shall be representative of the entire community to that extent as possible, and members on such Commissions, Committees, and Boards shall be willing to serve as a civic responsibility and without compensation.

(b) Term Limitations.

The term of appointees to a City Commission, Committee or Board shall be one (1) term unless reappointed by the Council. The term of appointees serving on outside organizations and regional authorities, and any term limits applicable thereto shall be subject to the policies and procedures of such organization or regional authority.

The following provisions shall apply to City Commission, Committee, and Board appointees. Appointees are limited to two (2) consecutive two-year terms of membership on a specific commission, committee, or board, including a partial term. An appointee may not be reappointed to the same Commission, Committee, or Board after completion of two consecutive terms, including a partial term. After serving a maximum of two two- year terms (including a partial term), an appointee shall not be reappointed to the same commission, committee or board unless at least one year has elapsed between the expired term limit and the effective date of commencement of the new term. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, an appointee shall not be precluded at any time following completion of service on a Commission, Committee or Board from being appointed to another commission, committee, or board without the lapse of time between appointments.

Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, if a committee is placed on hiatus by City Council action, the appointee’s term is considered active and continuous; therefore, any period that the committee is on hiatus shall be included as part of appointee’s term.

Staff will employ one or more of the following methods of outreach to attract applications from qualified candidates: (1) send letters to persons who previously have applied for a City appointment for any City Commission, Committee or Board, and who wish to be notified of open positions, and to other individuals who have expressed interest in notification of such openings (list to be maintained by City Clerk’s office); (2) place notice of vacancies in the City’s newsletter, and/or in a separate flyer; (3) publish notice of vacancies in a local newspaper; or (4) place notice on the City’s website.

356

Page | 54

(d) Application Process.

Each applicant shall be given an application packet that will include: an informational document including the eligibility criteria for appointment and a description of the role and responsibilities of the City Commission, Committee or Board; frequency, time, and location of meetings; Code of Ethics, Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) financial disclosure requirements; and reference to California open meetings law.

(e) Selection Process.

As a part of the selection/appointment process applicable to proposed members other than Council Members, the Council may interview any or all the individual’s submitting applications, as determined by the Council, in its discretion. The Council will implement a two Council Member Ad-hoc Committee to interview the applicants. Council Members serving in a committee will be assigned to that Ad-Hoc Interview Committee. Additional Council Members will be designated to all other Commission, Committees, and Boards without Council representation. Each Ad-hoc Committee will select interview dates and after candidates, if any, have been interviewed, the Ad-hoc Committees will forward their recommendations to the City Clerk.

The Council has the option, at its sole discretion, of re-appointing current Commission, Committee or Board members if said member have a two-year term remaining on the same Commission, Committee or Board.

(f) Voting Procedure.

In a regularly scheduled or special Council meeting, the Council shall vote for the proposed Ad-Hoc Council Interview Committee recommendations. All candidates will be appointed by majority of vote for a particular commission, committee, or board.

(g) Appointment Requirements.

The following requirements apply to the schedule for filling vacancies created by the expiration of a term or vacancies created by a resignation requiring an appointment for the remainder of that term.

(g)(2) Expired Term.

By the first Council meeting in May every year, the City Clerk shall submit to the Council a "Council Appointments List" of vacancies for terms expiring on June 30 of that year on all Commission, Committee and Board. Both incumbents seeking re-appointment and new applicants must apply. Appointments should be made by the second Council meeting in June every year.
357

Page | 55

(g)(3) Unscheduled Vacancies.

In the event of an unscheduled vacancy on the City’s Commission, Committee or Board, the City Clerk shall post a special vacancy notice no earlier than twenty (20) days before, nor later than twenty (20) days after the vacancy occurs. Final appointment to the Commission, Committee or Board cannot take place for at least ten (10) working days after the posting of the notice (Gov. Code 54974).

The Council may consider candidates for unscheduled or unforeseen committee’s vacancies that occur within a 6-month period of the annual recruitment. Following the conclusion of the annual recruitment, applications will remain active in the City Clerk’s office for 6- months.

3.03.080 SIMULTANEOUS SERVICE PROHIBITION.

Members shall not serve simultaneously on more than one Commission, Committee, or Board. However, a member may be appointed to an additional advisory body as a representative of the Commission, Committee, or Board on which the member serves as a non-voting member.

3.03.090 REVIEW OF COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS
RELEVANCE.

The Council will periodically, in consultation with Staff, review each of the City’s commissions, committees and boards to determine the relevance of their duties, work plan, membership and organization to the accomplishment of the Council’s Goals and Objectives. The Council may make such changes as it deems necessary to the duties, work plans, membership and organization of the Commissions, Committees, and Boards, on an as-needed basis.

358

Page | 56

CHAPTER 3.04

OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS, REGIONAL AUTHORITIES

AND CITY COMMITTEES

Sections:

3.04.010 Outside Organizations, Regional Authorities and City Committees.

3.04.020 Procedure for Council Member Assignments.

3.04.030 Reporting Responsibilities of Appointees.

3.04.040 Representational Responsibilities of Appointees.

3.04.050 Current Appointments.

3.04.010 OUTSIDE ORGANIZATIONS, REGIONAL AUTHORITIES AND CITY COMMITTEES.

The City of Indian Wells has numerous relationships with outside organizations and regional authorities, such as the League of California Cities and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). The City Council annually assigns, pursuant to the “Draft” system set forth in section 3.04.020, one or more Council Members, as applicable, to serve as the City’s representative on the governing bodies of such organizations and authorities.

Alternates appointed to these outside organizations have the same authority as the primary appointee when the appointee is absent. Once a Council Member has been assigned to participate in an outside organization or regional authority, separate approval is not needed to participate in a subcommittee of that organization or regional authority. The Council also annually assigns, pursuant to the “Draft” system set forth in section 3.04.020, Council Members to serve on City standing committees. Finally, the Council from time to time assigns Council members to serve on City Ad-Hoc Committees without using the “Draft” system (See Chapter 3.05).

These outside organizations and regional authorities may provide a stipend, compensation, or reimbursement of expenses. Income derived from serving on these outside organizations and regional authorities is to be reported as required by the FPPC (Form 806).

3.04.020 PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEMBER ASSIGNMENTS.

Annually or as vacancies occur, the City Clerk shall present to the Council a list of such outside organizations, regional authorities and City standing committees, and the names of Council members currently assigned to them. The Council shall attempt to spread the various Council member assignments so that each Council Member fairly shares the responsibility of representing or conducting business for the City. At the time of assigning Council Members to such outside organizations, authorities and City standing committees, the Council shall first review the list of all such organizations, regional authorities and City standing committees. The Council shall then review the policies and procedures pertaining 359

Page | 57

to the assignment of individual Council Members to such bodies prior to making assignments (as described below).

The Council shall then vote to assign Council members to such outside organizations, authorities and City standing committees. Assignments may thereafter be exchanged by affected Council members at any time without need for approval by the entire Council.

The City utilizes what is commonly called the “Draft” system to assign Council Members to outside organizations, regional authorities and City standing committees. The “Draft” is based on seniority of the Council members’ consecutive years of service. In the case where two or more Council members have been initially elected on the same date, the Council member receiving more votes shall be deemed to have seniority. Each Council member, in order of seniority, selects one (1) choice of assignment followed in turn by the other Council members’ choices, until all positions have been filled.

The Mayor shall automatically have priority right to serve on the CVAG Executive Committee. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem shall also automatically serve on the Council Standing Personnel Committee and Tee Standing Committee. For purposes of the “Draft”, the Mayor and/or Mayor Pro Tem may place their assignment on the CVAG Executive Committee, Personnel Standing Committee and Tee Standing Committee as their selection at any stage or in any of their turns in the “Draft”. Ad hoc committees comprised solely of Council members are not subject to the “Draft.”

Concerning the foregoing Council Member assignments, Council Members serve as “non- voting” members on their assigned City Commissions, Committees and Boards, including any Ad-Hoc Committee that includes resident members. For those years that there is/are no new Council Member(s), the Council in its sole discretion can chose to retain the existing assignments for another year, make some modifications to the existing assignments, or utilize the “draft” for Council member assignments.

3.04.030 REPORTING RESPONSIBILITIES OF APPOINTEES.

All Council Members representing the City on outside organizations, regional authorizes and City Committees should summarize their activities at Council meetings during Council Member’s reports. If the City reimburses a Council Member his/her actual and necessary expenses incurred in such representation, he/she shall give a report on the meetings he/she attended at the expense of the City at the next regular meeting of the City Council.

3.04.040 REPRESENTATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF APPOINTEES.

Council Members assigned to outside organizations or regional authorities represent the City's interest, generally as determined by a majority of the Council. Council Members are not to represent or vote their own or individual positions on an issue, but that of the City, 360

Page | 58

as articulated, directed or instructed by a majority of the Council. Wherever possible, all significant policy issues shall be brought before the Council for determination and instruction to the assigned Council Member. The assigned Council Member shall represent that position until such time as a majority of the Council changes or modifies its position on a policy issue.

3.04.050 CURRENT APPOINTMENTS.

Current assignments to outside organizations and regional authorities are on file in the office of the City Clerk.

361

Page | 59

CHAPTER 3.05

COUNCIL STANDING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES

Sections:

3.05.010 Establishment of Council Standing and Ad-Hoc Committees.

3.05.020 Procedure for Council Ad-Hoc Assignments.

3.05.030 Notice of Standing Committee Meetings.

3.05.040 Ad-Hoc Committee Meetings.

3.05.050 Report of Standing and Ad-Hoc Committees.

3.05.060 Annual Review of Standing and Ad-Hoc Committees Necessity.

3.05.010 ESTABLISHMENT OF COUNCIL STANDING AND AD HOC
COMMITTEES.

The Council may establish standing or Ad-Hoc Committees of the Council for policy review of a specific area or a specific issue. Ad-Hoc Committees may be established at the time of need. They shall have a specific program of work to perform and shall automatically dissolve once the program of work is completed. Ad-Hoc Committees may be comprised solely of Council Members, solely non-Council Members, or a combination of both.

Council standing committees will be used sparingly and ordinarily in an ad hoc capacity and may not speak or act for the Council. Council standing committees are to help the Council do its job by preparing policy alternatives and implications for Council deliberation.

3.05.020 PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL AD HOC ASSIGNMENTS.

The Mayor will make the recommendation as to the appointment of members to Ad-Hoc Committees, if the assignments are not made at the time the Ad-Hoc Committees is formed subject to Council approval. The Mayor shall assign replacement of members unable to participate on the designated Ad-Hoc Committee. The recommended appointments will be agendized for formal action by the entire Council at the next City Council meeting.

3.05.030 NOTICE OF STANDING COMMITTEE MEETINGS.

An agenda of all Council Standing Committees will be posted seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting, as per the Brown Act and the meeting will be open to the public. Generally speaking, no Council Members, except those appointed to the committee, may attend said meeting as there are Brown Act implications; however, there are exceptions where a non-standing Committee Member(s) may attend only as observers.

362

Page | 60

3.05.040 AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETINGS.

No member of the Council who is not a member of an Ad-Hoc Committee may attend a meeting of that Ad-Hoc Committee; however, exceptions can be made.

3.05.050 REPORT OF STANDING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES.

Standing and Ad-Hoc Committees will report on the work of the committee during Council Member Reports & Comments section of the City Council agenda. Whether or not there is agreement between the two members of the standing or Ad-Hoc Committees, the report to the entire Council will reflect the position of both members.

3.05.060 ANNUAL REVIEW OF STANDING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES NECESSITY.

The Council will review annually the relevance of the Council’s standing and Ad-Hoc Committees to the Council’s current Strategic Plan Goals and Objectives and will eliminate those which are determined by a majority of the Council to be no longer necessary.

363

City of Indian Wells
4/21/2022
44-950 Eldorado Drive,
Indian Wells
File #:ORD-006-22 Item #:C.

Indian Wells City Council
Staff Report - Community Development April 21, 2022
Proposed Ordinance Adding Section 11.36.125 and Amending Various Sections of the Municipal Code for Purposes of Clarifying Restrictions on the Parking and Storage of Recreational Vehicles Within the City RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council INTRODUCES Ordinance No.737 to read by title only and further reading waved approving Municipal Text Amendment No. 2022-01 regarding recreational vehicle parking and storage requirements; and
FINDS the action Exempt from CEQA.

DISCUSSION:

After an open public discussion regarding recreational vehicles (“RV”) at the October 10, 2021, City Council Meeting, Council requested Staff bring back an Ordinance to modify and provide better clarification of the City’s RV parking and storage requirements within the City’s Municipal Code. At the January 6, 2022 Council Meeting, the City Council voted to form an Ad Hoc Committee, consisting of council member’s Greg Sanders, Kimberly Muzik and city staff. The committee met in February, 2022 and outlined the RV Code Amendments in the proposed Ordinance for Council’s consideration.

Background
The current RV parking regulations were unanimously adopted by City Council on November 19, 1998, under Ordinance No. 442. Regulations regarding the parking and storage of RVs are currently found within Chapters 11.28 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code (“IWMC”). Sections 11.28.010 and

11.28.030(a) specifically regulate RV parking on city streets.

The proposed Ordinance further clarifies the city’s RV regulations and enforcement actions and consolidates the associated RV parking requirements under one section of the IWMC.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™364

File #:ORD-006-22 Item #:C.

Analysis
Existing City of Indian Wells RV Parking Requirements:

The City’s RV parking requirements prohibit the parking or storage of RV’s on streets or private property more than 24-hours, unless they are located within a completely enclosed structure approved by the city’s Design Review Committee. If the vehicle is parked on the street or private property and remains longer than 24-hours, Code Enforcement may issue a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) or administrative citation. If the RV is parked on the public street and remains on the street for 72-hours, the vehicle can be towed, per California’s Vehicle Code.

Proposed City of Indian Wells Parking Requirements:

From time to time, the City undertakes efforts to amend the IWMC to correct errors or omissions, increase clarity, and ensure consistency between other Code requirements. The proposed Ordinance (Attachment 1) is such an effort. Attachment 2 contains an overview of the Ordinance’s amendments to the IWMC. These amendments include:
·Updating the City’s definition for “recreational vehicles” to have the same meaning as defined under the California Vehicle Code.
·Clarifying that parking or storage of RV’s is prohibited on public or private streets or lots unless a temporary parking permit has been issued.
·Providing a temporary parking permit process at no-fee, both online through the city’s website and physically at City Hall.
·Clarifying the duration of temporary RV parking allowed with a permit is a maximum of 24- hours on public or private streets, and up to a maximum of 36-hours on private lots and shall not be reissued within 24-hours, with a contingency that no more than two (2) temporary parking permits shall be issued within a 7-day period for the same residence or recreational vehicle.
·Clarifying that any temporary parking on private lots shall be restricted to legal driveways, or that portion of the lot area where a legal garage is or can be constructed. ·Further clarifying that activities are restricted to loading or unloading of a vehicle while parked on public or private streets and requiring that any vehicle washing, or minor interior maintenance must be performed on a private lot.
·Providing an exception for short-term RV parking within a public parking lot or legal street City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™365

File #:ORD-006-22 Item #:C.
·Providing an exception for short-term RV parking within a public parking lot or legal street parking space when patronizing a business or visiting a park, and clarifying that after 2-hours of elapsed time at any one location or combination of locations with the city, the vehicle must relocate outside city limits for a minimum of 48-consecutive hours. ·Clarifying that temporary parking on public and private streets shall only be restricted to the abutting property of the permittee and does not authorize vehicle parking in a location prohibited by the City’s parking code or the California Vehicle Code. ·Providing an exception to allow short-term habitation in an RV through a temporary use permit process if a residential structure has been damaged due to an emergency situation. ·Providing an exception for residential property or private streets that are part of a common interest development (“CID”) to the extent that each homeowners’ association with jurisdiction over the CID has an express statement in its CC&Rs that allows for recreational vehicles to be parked within the CID.
·Providing a curtesy notice for first offence, and clarifying the enforcement and penalty for violating the RV Parking requirements and the appeal procedures for an administrative citation.

If the Ordinance is approved, it would take effect 30-days after its adoption. During this 30-day period, staff will circulate a public information campaign advising the residents of the updated RV parking and storage regulations. After the 30-day public information campaign, Code Enforcement will begin issuing first offense curtesy notices. After the curtesy notice, Code Enforcement will begin issuing administrative citations to any RV owners who continue to violate updated RV Code requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

This action has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. It was determined the Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060 (c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™366

File #:ORD-006-22 Item #:C.

ATTACHMENT:

1. Ordinance

2. Indian Wells Municipal Code Redline
City of Indian Wells Printed on 4/15/2022Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™367

26529.00000\34890307.2
ORDINANCE NO.737
ADDING SECTION 11.36.125 AND AMENDING

VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE

REGULATING PARKING AND STORAGE OF
RECREATIONAL VEHICLES WITHIN THE CITY; AND

FINDING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
WHEREAS, the City of Indian Wells, California (the “City”) is a municipal corporation and charter city, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 65800 et seq. authorizes the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations by cities as a means of implementing the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has the authority under Article 11, Section 5 of the California Constitution and the City Charter to make, amend, and enforce all ordinances and regulations with respect to municipal affairs; and
WHEREAS, the City desires and intends to add Section 11.36.125 to govern the parking of recreational vehicles in the City and to amend various related sections in the Indian Wells Municipal Code (“IWMC”) for purposes of increasing clarity and ensure consistency between all code requirements related to the parking and storage of recreational vehicles within the city; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells to consider this Ordinance was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2022, a public hearing on this Ordinance was held by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, after careful consideration of the staff report and all the information, evidence, and testimony presented at its public hearing, the City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with General Plan goals and policies pertaining to land development, city image, orderly growth, and economic development.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The Recitals above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no ATTACHMENT #1
368

26529.00000\34890307.2

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. 737

Page 2 ends

Indian Wells City CouncilApril 21, 2022

Indian Wells City Council
April 21, 2022