Agenda, regular meeting — Indian Wells City Council, June 10, 2025 (part 4 of 4)

26529.00000\42069066.3

18 BB&K (2024) MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

The Contractor shall provide all materials, labor and equipment necessary for the sweeping of various City streets and curbs. The work to be done consists of vacuum sweeping all designated improved public streets including curb returns and medians within the City of Indian Wells on a uniform schedule as outlined below. No street and curb sweeping shall be performed during rainstorms, when there is running water in the gutter or street, or for any other reason that makes sweeping impractical as determined by the Public Works Director.

1. Completion of Project and Scheduling.

The Contractor shall begin sweeping streets and curbs designated by plans and as repeated below.

SCHEDULE OF WORK – The Contractor’s schedule for carrying out the work specified shall be submitted to the City for review and approval at the time of acceptance of the contract by the City.

The regularly scheduled street sweeping and curbs shall be adhered to by the Contractor. All deviations from this schedule shall be approved by the Public Works Director in advance of the requested deviation.

City Field Work Hours (for daytime work):
a. 7:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday – Friday
b. 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Saturday
c. No work on Sunday or National holidays

ADDITIONAL WORK – In the event the City desires to extend the street and curb sweeping program to include new streets constructed after the effective date of this contract, or new alleys, then any such additional sweeping which is required of the Contractor shall be paid for at the then current unit prices for compensation specified by the contract and subsequent contract amendments to it.

2. Liquidated Damages for Delay
Failure of Contractor to complete sweeping zones during days and hours posted for notices of violation, except on holidays or due to rain, shall result in a deduction of $500.00 from payment otherwise due Contractor for each incomplete sweep day to reimburse City for losses sustained.

Liquidated damages shall also apply to any noncompliance with the performance of street sweeping, including dust violations, and NPDES violations, etc.

3. Conduct of Work
The Project shall be carried out as quietly as possible to prevent possible annoyance to adjacent residential property and according to the ordinance for hours of work. The work finished shall be performed once per week, and on Friday of each week. In the event of a National Holiday occurring on a Friday, no work shall be allowed to be completed. The Project shall be completed on the following Monday and shall not eliminate the regular work scheduled for the following Friday.

Page 325 of 409 ends

26529.00000\42069066.3

19 BB&K (2024) MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT

Unnecessary noise should be always avoided. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of all local anti-noise ordinances.

Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall execute street sweeping during the hours specified in Section 100.14 “Hours of Sweeping” of these specifications. Work at other times and work on holidays will be permitted only with the prior approval or direction of the Public Works Director or Designee.

4. Water
The Contractor shall provide water needed for the street sweeping operation under this Contract.

The Contractor shall, at its own expense, convey the water, in each case, to the point of use. Water shall be fresh water only and the source of supply shall be approved by the Public Works Director prior to its use. No residual tracking is permitted. Any residual tracking will require pressure washing and removal of wastewater and debris in compliance with NPDES regulations.

Alternative methods for cleanup shall require approval by City’s Representative. The proper volume and pressure of water shall be supplied by the sweeper at all times to adequately control dust during the sweeping operation. The contractor shall comply with all current South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements for dust control during the course of the contract.

5. Environmental Compliance
All street sweeping activities shall comply with the Whitewater River Region Storm Water Management Plan and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MS4 Permit. In accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District regulation Rule 1186 (see AQMD.gov) contractor shall mitigate for air born dust.

6. Disposal of Waste Material
All cleared and waste material shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be disposed of by the Contractor outside the Project area at the Contractor’s expense in accordance with the applicable ordinances and regulations of governmental agencies having jurisdiction. Contractor shall provide a waste disposal ticket from a certified disposal site with monthly invoicing.

Sweepings may be deposited at temporary dump sites with the prior approval of the Public Works Director. Sweepings shall not be deposited in City streets or alleys. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to identify locations and obtain all necessary approvals for utilizing the site as a temporary dump site. Contractor shall remove sweepings within 48 hours and shall be responsible for all costs related to pick up and removal of all sweepings. After each removal and before the next one, Contractor shall sweep the temporary dump site. City shall retain the right to demand abandonment of any temporary dump site and may request Contractor to establish different temporary dump sites, the location of which will be approved by the Public Works Director prior to dumping.

Page 326 of 409 ends

26529.00000\42069066.3

20 BB&K (2024) MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT

7. Statement Required
The Contractor shall submit a monthly statement indicating number of curb miles swept on a regular schedule and additional ones swept by call back or extra work request. The monthly statement shall also include waste disposal weight ticket(s) and water use verification.

8. Reduction of Service Level
The City of Indian Wells reserves the right to reduce the frequency of street sweeping services and/or the number of areas being swept. When a reduction of the service level is desired, the Public Works Director will advise the Contractor of the changes in writing and their effective date.

The Contractor shall then proceed with the work as reduced on the effective date of the notice.

9. Storage of Equipment
The Contractor must provide his own storage for equipment such as sweepers, brooms, tires, gas, oil, and other required parts and materials.

10. Speed of Vehicles
The Contractor shall operate the sweepers between 4 and 5 miles per hour when sweeping, unless it can be proven to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director or Designee that the sweeper can operate at a higher speed and still meet expectations of the contract.

11. Complaints
Complaints regarding the street sweeping operations, which the Public Works Director or Designee considers justifiable and the responsibility of the Contractor, will be referred to the Contractor for immediate attention. A report of the action taken on each complaint shall be submitted by the Contractor within one (1) day after receiving the complaint to the Public Works Director on a standard complaint form, supplied by the Public Works Department.

12. Tracking System
City shall have access to contractor’s vehicle tracking system. Positioning device equipped sweeping vehicles are required for this contract for monitoring and communication purposes.

13. Quality of Work
The standards of performance which the Contractor is obligated to perform hereunder are those standards which are considered to be good street sweeping practices and which are subject to approval by the Public Works Director or designated representative. In the event that obstructions, excessive amount (i.e. more than 3 flat shovels) of sand and or debris on the gutter that can create tracking, shall immediately be reported to Public Works Superintendent.

Page 327 of 409 ends

26529.00000\42069066.3

21 BB&K (2024) MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT

14. Hours of Sweeping
All scheduled street sweeping shall be performed only during the working hours allowed in the City’s municipal code. The hours and weekday the sweeping occurs each week shall be approved by the Public Works Director or Designee.

15. Equipment
All sweeping shall be performed with alternate fuel powered air sweepers. Equipment not suitable to produce the quality of work required shall not be permitted to operate on the contract work. All equipment shall be subject to the Public Works Director approval prior to use. All sweeping equipment shall have appropriate safety markings consisting of all highway lighting, flashing, and warning lights, clearance lights, and warning flags, all in accordance with the California Vehicle Code and approved by the Public Works Director or Designee.

16. Inclement Weather
A scheduled sweep shall not be canceled for inclement weather by the Street Sweeping Contractor without approval of the Public Works Director or Designee. During inclement weather a two (2) hour standby period between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. will be observed before a scheduled residential sweep will be canceled.

17. Permits
All work performed shall be in accordance with the permit requirement of the agencies having jurisdiction. The City will issue a no charge encroachment permit for the course of the contract.

18. Level of Service
Contractor shall provide a high level of service consistent with the requirements outlined throughout the Special Provisions and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director or Designee.

19. Extra Work
Unforeseen work will be classified as extra work when determined by the Public Works Director that such work is not covered by these Special Provisions. Extra work also includes work specifically designated as extra work in the plans and specifications.

The Contractor shall specify in his bid cost per curb mile for extra work added to the regular schedule during the year and the cost per hour for special on-call work of an extraordinary nature, including but not limited to construction spillage, accidents, sandblasting, paving preparation, and special events which may require sweeping services during the year.

The Contractor shall do such extra work in accordance with the provisions of these specifications and shall furnish all labor, materials, and equipment.

Page 328 of 409 ends

26529.00000\42069066.3

22 BB&K (2024) MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT

20. Map and Schedule of Services
Contractor will provide a map and schedule of services that is available to all residents and the City of Indian Wells. The map and schedule is subject to approval by the city.

Page 329 of 409 ends

26529.00000\42069066.3

23 BB&K (2024) MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES

The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2030, unless earlier terminated as provided herein.

Page 330 of 409 ends

26529.00000\42069066.3

24 BB&K (2024) MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION

The total compensation shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Four Hundred Ninety-Two and 08/100 Dollars ($100,492.08) without written approval of City’s Representative based on the following rates:

PERFORMANCE/PAYMENT BONDS ARE NOT REQUIRED

Page 331 of 409 ends

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025

To: City Council
From: Finance Department
Prepared by: Amy Dallosta, Accountant
Subject: City Treasurer’s Report for March 2025

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council RECEIVES and FILES the City Treasurer’s Report for March 2025; and

FINDS the project to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060.

DISCUSSION:

This report comprehensively analyzes the City of Indian Wells' cash and investment position as of March 31, 2025. The city maintains a robust investment strategy, focusing on prudence, liquidity, and compliance with legal requirements. The Treasurer's certification ensures adherence to the city's investment policy and compliance with the State of California Government Code section 53600.

Financial Snapshot:

As of March 31, 2025:

 Total cash and investments: $88,224,865.93
 Portfolio rate of return: 3.507%

Treasurer's Certification:

The City Treasurer certifies:
 Compliance with the city's investment policy and legal requirements.  Adequate liquidity to meet financial obligations for the next six months, ensuring static and dynamic liquidity.

Page 332 of 409 ends

Fiscal Prudence:

Aligned with fiduciary duty, the city adheres to a prudent investment approach, considering economic conditions and anticipated needs. Investments are guided by a written policy emphasizing safety, liquidity, and yield.

BACKGROUND:

The Treasurer's Report provides a monthly update on cash activity and the investment portfolio, ensuring reconciliation with the General Ledger. Investments align with the city's investment policy and State legislation, covering U.S. treasuries, federal agency securities, corporate notes, municipal bonds, CDs, and overnight cash investments.

Investment Strategy:

The city's investment portfolio is designed to achieve a market rate of return within risk constraints. Diversification across institutions, security types, and matur ities maximizes safety and yield amid changing market conditions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The investment portfolio generated $131,551.98 in earnings for March 2025. The investment strategy aims for consistent returns throughout budgetary and economic cycles, reflecting prudent risk management. Moreover, the strategy's success in consistently generating returns reflects its adaptability to changing market conditions. As economic cycles fluctuate, the city's investment approach remains resilient, adjusting to dynamic financial landscapes to optimize safety and yield.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed per the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental regulations. The City, acting as the Lead Agency, determined that this resolution is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment as there is no possibility that the action would result in a significant environmental impact, and because it does not constitute a “project” as defined in Section 15 378 of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. City Treasurer’s Report

Page 333 of 409 ends

Bank Reconciliation Report - CiW Held Cash
Finance DePartment
of Indian Wells
1 2
3 6
7 8
9 10
19 2t
516
5L7
518
5r9
522
525
548
550
557
558
561
562
573
574
s75
585
585
587
588
589
s90
591
592
597
598
s99
607
609
6L2
524
526
533
s38
549
556
s75
611
542
544
546
551
559
560
563
566
567
57t
572
605
613
531
s93
s94
610
Pacific Western I1L7
Pacific Western Bank - Accts. Payable *x-**3411
Pacific Western Bank - Payroll **-*xL752
Pacific Western Bank - Ambulance x*-x***7937
Pacific Western Bank - Public Funds MMA **-***x5064
US Bank Money Market - Investment
LJS Bank Money Market - 4590
US Bank Money Market - 4591
PeW Cash
Aqency Fund - City
Bank of India
Certificate of Deposit-First Natl Bank of Mccreqor TX 321i2UDR9 Certiflcate of Deposit-Centerstate Bank 1520lQDE4
Certifi cate of Deposit-Northwest Bank 66736A8V0
Certificate of Deposit-Pacific Western Bank 69506YR15
Certificate of Deposit-Bank of Baroda 06063HM59
Certiflcate of Deposit-Tovota Financial Sqs Bank 89235MKY6 Certificate of Deposit-Greenstate Credit Union 395731811 Certificate of Deposit-Pentaqon Federal Credit Union 70962LAS1 Certificate of Deposit-Nelnet Bank, hc 64034KAG6
Certificate of Deposit-Beal Bank 07371AYE7
Certificate of Deposit-Beal Bank USA 07371CE88
Certificate of DeDosit-Capital One NA 14042RU18
Certificate of Deposit-Austin Telco Fed Credit Union 0523928T3 Certificate of Deposit-svnchronv Bank 87164XR65
Certificate of Deposit-Libertv First Credit Union 530520AK1 Certificate of Deposit-First Guarantv Bank Hammond LA
Certificate of Deposit-Medallion Bank Utah 58404DSW2
Certificate of Deposit-Pitnev Bowes Bank 724468AG8
Certificate of Deposit-Bank Five Nine 062119CD2
Certificate of Deposit-First Foundation Bank 32026UW51
Certificate of Deposit-Summit National Bank 86616MGo
Certificate of Deposit-First National Bank ofAmerica 32110YD93 Certificate of Deposit-Morqan Stanlev Private Bank 61768ET29 Certificate of Deposit-Cross River Bank 227563EX7
Certlficate of Deposit-Universal Bank and Trust Co 91527PCF2 Certificate of Deposit-Sallie Mae 795451DM2
Certificate of Deposit-Leaders Credit Union 52171MAN5
Certificate of Deposit-Pacific Premier Bank 4800121693
Bank of New 06406RAN7
Montebello CA Pens Obliq AA 612285AE6
JP Morqan Chase Bank NA 46632FRu1
JP Morqan Chase 48128G2Q2
Bank of America MTN 06048WM31
Bank of America MTN 06048WM72
lohn Deere Capital CorP 24422EWR6
Toyota Motor credit Corp 89236TMK8
Bank
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3130ALMM3
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3130A1W67
Fed. Farm Credit Bank 3130AMW57
Fed. Home Loan Bank 3130AQWF6
Fed. Home Loan Bank 3130AQWJ8
Fed. Home Loan Bank 3130AQ255
Fed. Home Loan Bank 3130ARGE5
Fed. Home Loan Mtq CorP 3134GXQP2
Fed. Home Loan Bank 313045567
Fed. Home Loan Bank 3130AS591
Fed.Home Loan Bank 313081UH8
Fed.Home Loan Bank 313084RS2
States Treasury
United States Treasury Bill 912810FF0
LJnited States Treasurv Bill 9f282CLK5
Total Pooled cash and Investments
Fair Value Increase (over cost)
Warrants/Wire Transfers Oustandinq (Bank)
Outgoinq ACH Payments Outstandinq (GL)
Credit Card in Transit
Reconciled Bank Balance

0.00 0.00

0.00 16,408.43

0.00 10,345,493.75
14,521,063.5 1
2,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
2s0,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
2s0,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
256,217.98
1,002,727.02
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00

1.015,356.96
997,528.55
13,442,266.07
2,011,27s.82
(780,47r.75)
3 1,856.84
4,27t.9I
7,208,217
(r,692,72r.02)
$ 85,787,801.91
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
CA
items
Outstanding Items
5n9n025,203 PM T:\Common\bank\bank reconcilialion fv25\9-Mar 25\2025-03-RPT-f,ar Bank Rec$/ar 25 pooled-UPDATED ATTACHMENT#1

Page 334 of 409 ends

UNRESTRICTED FUNDS

GENERAL FUND
101- GENERAL

TOTAL GENERAL FUND

RESTRICTED FUNDS

SPECIAT REVENUE FUNDS
202 - TMFFIC SAFETY
203 - PUBLIC SAFETY 1/2 CENT SALES TAX
204 - MEASURE'A'
209 - F.A.M.D. #1
210 - SCAQMD (VEHICLE REG.)
211 - AB 3229 COPS FUNDING
214 - GAS TAX 2103 MAINTENANCE
215 - GAS TAX 2105 MAINTENANCE
216 - GAS TAX 2106 CONSTRUCT/MAINT
217 - GAS TAX.2TO7 MAINTENANCE
218 - GAS TAX 2107.5 ENG,/ADMIN
219 - GAS TAX RMRA
228 - EMERG. UPGMDE SERVICES
247 - AB 939 RECYCLING FUND
248 - SOLID WASTE
251 - STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 2OOO-1
253- INDIAN WELLS VILLAS OPEMTIONS
254- MOUNTAIN VIEW VILI-AS OPEMTIONS
256. HOUSING AUTHORITY
271 - ELDOMDO DRIVE LLMD
272 - MONTECITO/STARDUST LLMD
273 - CASA DOMDO LLMD
274 -THE COVE LLMD
27s - SH 11I/IWGR (ENTMNCE) LLMD
276 - CLUB/IW LANE LLMD
277 - COLONY LLMD
278 - COLONY COV ESTATES LLMD
279 - DESERT HORIZONS LLMD
280 . MOUNTAIN GATE LLMD
281 . MOUNTAIN GATE ESTATES LLMD
282 - VILLAGIO LLMD
283 - VAIDYA LLMD
284 - CLUB, SOUTH OF 111 LLMD
285 - MONTELENA LLMD
286 - SUNDANCE LLMD
287 - PROVINCE LLMD
288 - PROVINCE DBAD

TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
310 - PARK FACILMES FEES
311 - TMNSPORTATION FACILMES FEES
313 - RECREATION FACILMES FEES
314 - PARK-IN-LIEU FEES
315 - CITYWIDE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FEE
316 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
319 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
321 - HIGHWAY 111 CIRCULANON IMP FEE

TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
NET CASH & INVESTMENT SUMMARY MARCH 2025
March
2025
$ 17,829,319.33
17,829,3L9.33
March
2024
$ 14,r8t.224.60
L4,L8L,224,60

0.00 0.00

0.00 702,594.5t
19,387.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 5,888,519.33
270,r35.53
56,342.39
20,9r3.74
43,676.r8
256,6t0.94
390,273.44
rzt,700.43
22,307.lL
1,532.00
1,525.00
368,658.33
57,283.12
L24,687.66
56,487.r9
1,985.00
r20,758.78
50,701.50
280,724.99
42,424.43
40,860.38
rr9,974.57
t,547.00
100,491.31
tr,409.r7
6,945,88
37,046.45
945,536,63
16,365.93
Lr,L57.04
2L.60

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
t92,806.78
4,664,849.59
272,323.96
94,538.54
17,405.75
106,610.55
347,385.38
r,224,299.r9
79,6tt.57
11,219.06
17,973.24
t4,546.40
204,902.25
3L,222.68
98,t42.09
49,639.48
327,606.52
103,818.53
47,599.73
246,436.89
35,854.51
33,934.56
90,760.05
1,587.00
99,367.O0
555,714.53607.92s.39
9t77O,O27.25

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
0,00
14,377,489.85
739,476.30

0.00 9,998,638.53

0.00 0.00

0.00 0,00

0.00 11,986,856.58
744,566.24
36,460.70
L2,767p83,52
T:\Common\bank\Treasureds Report\Cash'l 0Mar 25
15,116,966.15
1:49 PM5l28l2O25Page 335 of 409

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
NET CASH & INVESTMENT SUMMARY MARCH 2025
PAGE 2
RESTRIGTED FUNDS (CONI.)

REPLACEMENT FUNDS
326 - BUILDINGS CAPITAL RESERVE
327 - BRIDGES CAPITAL RESERVE
328 - MEDIANS & PARKWAYS CAPIIAL RESERVE
329 - STORM DMINS CAPITAL RESERVE
330 - TMFFIC SIGNALS CAPITAL RESERVE
331 - TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL RESERVE
332 - CITY STREETS CAPITAL RESERVE
333 - CITY VEHICLES CAPITAL RESERVE
350 - DISASTER RECOVERY RESERVE

TOTAL REPLACEMENT FUNDS

SUCCESSORAGENCY FUNDS
453 - DEBT SERVICE
456 - RDA OBLIGATION RENREMENT

TOTAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY FUNDS

FINANCING AUTHORITY FUNDS
460 - INDIAN WELLS FINANCING AUTHORITY

TOTAL FINANCING AUTHORITY FUNDS

ENTERPRISE FUNDS
560 - INDIAN WELLS GOLF RESORT

TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
601 - INTERNALTRUST FUND

TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS

RESERVE FUNDS
602 - COMPENSATED ABSENCES

TOTAL RESERVE FUNDS

TRUST & AGENCY FUNDS
732 - SPECIAL DEPOSITS

TOTAL TRUST & AGENCY FUNDS

TOTAL ALL FUNDS

FISCAL AGENTS
253 - INDIAN WELLS VILLAS
254 - MOUNTAIN VIEW VILTAS
453 - US BANK TRUSTEE . SUCCESSOR AGENCY DEBT SERVICE
460 - US BANK - INDIAN WELLS FINANCE AUTHORITY
560 - INDIAN WELLS GOLF RESORT
601 - INTERNAL TRUST FUND

TOTAL FISCAL AGENTS

TOTAL ALL FUNDS & FISCAL AGENTS

UNRESTRICTED FUNDS

RESTRICTED FUNDS
LL,323,336.26 L5.22
16,634,835,62 14,8L3,727.27
s Lo2,422,637.53 $ 86,241,394.86
292OO,7O7.87
2,453,504.80
2,240,4r2.00
1,852,553,07
1,103,483,00
966,632.00
912,151.00
18,578,839.00
470,270.00
622.863.00
2,1 13,012.80
1,916,148.00
1,557,830.07
865,812,00
739,387.00
689,055.00
17,010,165.00
280,826.00
433,619.00
25,605,854.87
March
2025
March
2024
5,352,4rr.68
1651-303 00)
4,857,133.93

0.00 4,857,133.93
15,37O.4O
100.68
6,1O8,1OO.68
41691,108.68

0.93 1
o.93
632.77
L,2O2,632.77
2,326,8r5.36 1.089.111
2,326,815.36

0.00 1,571,089.11
613,119.0q_
o.o0
s63.360.94
613,149.O0
Teqp!518
563,360.94
85,787,801.91
796,085.58
7L,427F67.59
r20,275.08
269,887.69
5,200.60
3,0r7,472.76
1,898,663.23
83,048.38
4L3,r27.66
582.62
7,4r4,887.88
5,269,965.51
L7,829,3L9,33
84,593,318.20
1,4,L8tt224,60
72,0,60,L7O.26
$ 86,241,394.86
T:\Common\bank\Treasure/s Report\Cash'l 0Mar 25
$53
1:49 PM5l28l2O25

Page 336 of 409 ends

;-. I
it
/,.f. /
| --t.1 :

INDIAN )) WELLS City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-248e

YTM YTM
365 Equiv.

CALIFORNIA
The Gity of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2025
MarketPar Book
Value
Yo ol
Portfolio
Days to
lnvestments
Managed Pool Accounts - LAIF
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
Negotiable CD's
Medium Term Corporate Notes
Federal Agency lssues - Callables
Treasury Securities
Miscellaneous Securities - Coupon
Componding Certificates of Deposit
lnvestments
Term 360
3,M8,288.55
25,852,956.56
6,952,000.00
9,000,000.00
17,000,000.00
25,000,000.00
300,000.00
256,217.98
87,809,463.09
3,448,288.55
2s,852,956.56
6,918,042.45
8,814,080.00
16,695,800.00
25,610,930.00
296,913.00
256,217.58
87,853,228.54
3,448,288.55
25,852,956.56
6,952,000.00
9,015,855.84
17,000,000.00
25,399,547.00
300,000.00
256,217.98

3.91 29.30

7.88 10.22

19.27 28.79

0.34 0.29
1 1
1,825
1,796
1,781
1,650
1,76s
36s
I
1 843
504
799
1 ,198
122
156

4.254

4.057

2.514

1.695

2.725

4.146
1"085

3.521

4.313

4.1't4

2.U9

1.718

2.763

4.204

1.100

3.570
88,224,865.93 100.00% 1,1s3 618 3.459 3.507
Total
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
March 31 Month Ending
260,830.46
88,025,399.87

3.49%
The
cash flow from revenue and maturing investments will be sufficient to cover expenditures for the next six months. All securities are "Marked-to-Market" on a monthly basis.

Reporting period 03/01 /202543131 12025 Portfolio CITY
AP
PM (PRF_PMl) 7.3.11
ReportVer.7.3.11
Run Daie: 05/28/2025 - 18:02 No fiscal year history available

Page 337 of 409 ends

CUSIP lnvestment #
Managed Pool Accounts - LAIF
SYS21
SY523
lssuer
LAIF - City
LAIF - Redevelopment
Average
Balance
6,061,191.78
21,319,781.65
Market Value
3,448,288.55

0.00 3,448,288.55
25,852,956.56
Stated
BookValue Rate

Page 1 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
Maturitv nrfc

4.254

0.230
The City of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
March 31,2025
Purchase
Date Par Value
3,448,288.55

0.00 3,448,288.55
Fitch
21 23
07t01t2023
07tol12023
967,990.87

0.00 16,408.43

0.00 14,521,063.51
10,345,493.75

0.00 0.00

0.00 2,000.00

0.00 967,990.87

0.00 16,408.43

0.00 14,521,063.51
10,345,493.75

0.00 0.00

0.00 2,000.00

0.00 3,448,288.55

0.00 3,448,288.55
967,990.87

0.00 16,408.43

0.00 14,521,063.51
10,345,493.75

0.00 0.00

0.00 2,000.00

0.00 25,852,956.56
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
248,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00

4.313
o.233

0.250

4.480

4.260

4.270

0.200

4.254Subtotal and Average
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
1 SYSl
SYS6
SYST
SYSS
SYSlO
SYS9
SYS2
SYS3
SY54
SYS19
SYSS
1 6
7 8
10 9
2 J
4 19
574
525
589
561
562
573
518
s98
586
592
590
517
550
609
585
587
597
558
519
Pacific Western Bank
Pacific Westem Bank-Ambulance
Pacifi c Western-PublicFundsMMA
US Bank Money Market
US Bank Money Market4591
US Bank Money Market4590
Pacilic Western - Acct Payable
Pacifi c Western-Payroll
Union Bank-Checking
Petty Cash
WestAmerim Bank
Subtotal and Average

0.247

0.000

4.419

0.000

4.202

4.212

0.000

0.197

0.000

0.000
07t01t2023
071o112023
0710112023
07t01t2023
09t21t2022
07t22t2020
07131t2023
022312022
02i23t2022
0912112022
0413012020
03t07t2024
08t11t2023
08t16t2023
o&t16t2023
o4t24t2020
06t16t2021
08t30t2024
08t11t2023
07t31t2023
03t06t2024
02o2t2022
0413012020
25,852,956.56
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
248,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
248,217.50
246,236.10
251,905.83
240,232.50
240,232.50
244,727.50
247,357.68
245,024.80
251,920.77
256,407.75
246,464.40
24A,422.32
240,615.00
247,817.25
255,065.64
251,168.79
245,898.32
238,637.50
248,350.1 1
0912112027
0712212025
07t28t2028
02t1712027
0211712027
0912112027
c/.t3012025
03to712029
o8lul202a
08t15t2028
08/09/2028
o4t28no25
o6t16no26
0813012029
08107t2028
07t31t2028
03t06t2029
02t02t2027
04t30t2025

4.057
Negotiable CD's
0523928T3
06063HM59
062119CD2
073714YE7
07371 CE88
14042RUJ8
152010DE4
227563EX7
320437AD8
321't0YD93
32026UW51
321 12UDRg
395731811
52171 MANs
5305204K1
58404DSW2
61 768ET29
64034KAG6
66736A8V0
Austin Telco Fed Credit Union
Bank of Baroda
Bank Five Nine
Beal Bank - Plano TX
Beal Bank USA
Capital One NA
Centerstate Bank NA
Cross River Bank
First Guaranty Bank Hammond LA
First National Bank of America
First Foundation Bank
First Natl Bank of McGregor TX
Greenstate Credit Union
Leaders Credit Union
Liberty First Credit Union
Medallion Bank Utah
Morgan Stanley Private Bank
Nelnet Bank, lnc.

Northwest Bank

3.800

0.700

4.500

1.900

3.900

1.250

4.250

4.500

4.450

1.350

0.900

4.000

4.700

4.400

4.350

1.500

1.200

3.748

0.690

4.438

1.874

0.000

1.233

4.192

4.438

4.394

0.000

1.332

0.888

3.945

4.641

4.406

4.290

1.479
1jU
903
112
1,214
687
687
903
29 1,436
1,221
't,232
1,226
27 441
1,612
1,224
1,217
1,435
672
29 Portfolio CITY
AP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.1 1Run Date:05/2812025 - 18:02
Report Ver. 7.3-1 1

Page 338 of 409 ends

The Gity of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
March 31,2025
Purchase
Date Par Value
Stated
BookValue Ra13

Page 2 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
Fitch 360 Maturitv DatecuslPlnvestment #
Negotiable CD's
69506YR15
709621AS1
724468AG8
795451 DM2
85628sTF8
86616RAGo
87164XR65
89235MKY6
91527PCF2
Medium Term Corporate Notes
06048WM31
06048WM72
06406MN7
24/22EWR6
48128G2Q2
46632FRUl
61228sAE6
89236TMK8
lssuer
Pacific Westem Bank CA CD
Pentagon Federal Credit Union
Pitney Bowes Bank lnc.

Sallie Mae
State Bank of lndia NY, NY CD
Summit National Bank
Synchrony Bank
Toyota Financial Sgs Bk
Universal Bank and Trust Co.

Subtotal and Average
Bank of America MTN A
Bank of America MTN A
Bank of New York Mellon Corp
John Deere Capital Corp
JPMorgan Chase & Co
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Montebello CA Pens Oblig AA
Toyoia Motor Credit Corp
Subtotal and Average
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Bank
Fed. Home Loan Mtg Corp
522
557
588
607
516
591
575
548
599
Average
Balance
7,89s,548.39
9,016,833.51
04t30t2020
09t29t2021
0713112023
07126t2024
c/,12912020
08t16t2023
09123t2022
0412212021
o311312024
05n8t2021
07t30t2021
0511412020
05t18t2023
0?J26t2021
01t2212021
0711712020
11t06t2024
03t24t2021
0313012021
04t2?i2021
06t30t2021
0225t2022
02J24t2022
0311012022
04t2112022
08t16t2022
o811012022
07t03t2024
01t29t2025
04t28t2022
248,000.00
249,000.00
244,000.00
244,O00.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
250,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
6,952,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
9,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00

1.000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
Market Value
247,357.68
237,511.14
246,069.12
245,681.16
247,442.00
254,301.21
249,015.00
241,812.50
2s0,1 s0.38
6,918,042.45
963,1 50.00
958,510.00
998,1 10.00
1,014,370.00
960,000.00
1,923,460.00
996,270.00
1 ,000,210.00
8,814,080.00
968,390.00
1,938,320.00
968,360.00
1 ,941 ,160.00
965,1 30.00
963,400.00
971,730.00
978,850.00
999,780.00
993,630.00
2,004,840.00
2,003,220.00
998,990.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
2214,000.00
2z+4,000.00
248,000.00
249,000.00
2s0,000.00
250,000.00
249,000.00
6,952,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,243.31
1 ,015,356.96
'1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,002,727.O2
997,528.55
9,015,855.84
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00

2.514 843
04t30t2025
09t29t2026
0713112028
07t2412029
04t29t2025
oat1012028
09123t2027
04t22t2026
o3t1312029
05t2a12026
07t3012026
0412412025
01t20t2028
02t26t2026
01t22t2026
0610112025
08/09/2029
03t24t2026
0313012026
04t2212026
06t30t2026
02t2512027
0224t2027
o3t10t2027
04t21t2027
08t16t2027
ogt10t2027
06t26t2029
01t16t2030
04t2812025

1.250

0.900

4.400

4.300

1.600

4.500

3.950

0.900

4.250

1.250

1.200

1.600

4.750

0.800

0.700

2.503

4.550

0.875

1.000
1 .100

1.250

2.150

2.050

2.500

3.000

4.500

4.000

5.000

3.030

1.233

0.888

0.000

4.241

1.578

4.443

3.896

0.888

4.192

1.233

1.184
1 .190

4.083

0.789

0.690

0.819

4.549

0.863

0.986

1.085

0.873

2.121

2.022

2.466

2.959

4.438

3.945

4.932

2.988
29 546
1,217
'1,575
28 1,227
905
386
1,442
422
485
23 1,O24
331
296
ot
1,591
357
363
386
455
695
694
708
750
867
861
1,547
1,751
27 549
556
524
576
538
533
526
611
542
544
546
551
559
560
s63
566
571
572
605
613
567

1.695 504
Federal Agency lssues - Gallables
31 30ALJ62
313OALMM3
3130A1W67
3130AMW57
313OAQWF6
313OAQWJ8
3130AQ255
313OARGE5
3130A5567
3130ASS91
31 3081 UH8
31 3084RS2
3134GXOP2

2.725 799
Portfolio CITY
AP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.1 1Run Date: 05/2812025 - 18:02
Subtotal and Average 17,774,193.55 17,000,000.00 16,695,800.00 17,000,000.00

Page 339 of 409 ends

The City of lndian Wells
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
March 31,2025
Stated
BookValue Rate

Page 3 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
Maturitv l}fcCUSIP
Treasury Securities
91282CFUO
91 281 0FF0
91282C1K5
lssuer
U.S. Treasury
U.S. Treasury
U.S. Treasury
Subtotal and Average
Pacific Premier Bank
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
lnvestment #
Average
Balance
2s,403,803.55
300,000.00
2U,047.46
88,02s,399.87
Purchase
Date
12t12t2023
12t14t2023
09t20t2024
10t01t2020
09t04t2024
Par Value
1 0,000,000.00
13,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
25,000,000.00
300,000.00
300,000.00
256,217.98
256,217.98
87,809,463.09
Market Value
10,056,600.00
13,579,410.00
1,974,920.00
25,610,930.00
296,913.00
295,913.00
256,217.98
255,217.98
87,893,228.54
Fitch
593
594
610
9,946,005.11
13,442,266.07
2,01't,275.82

4.125
s.250

3.625

4.294

4.143

3.437
943 10t31t2027
1,324 11t15t2028
1,613 08/31/2029
Gomponding Gertificates of Deposit
48001 21 693
Miscellaneous Securities - Coupon
63877NMM6 531 Natomas CA Sch Dist M lnsured
Subtotal and Average
25,399,547.00
300,000.00 1.100
300,000.00
2s6,217.98 3.570
256,2'.t7.98
88,224,865.93

4.146 1,198

1.085 122 08tD1t2025

1.085 122

3.521 156 0910412025

3.521 156

3.459 6'18
Portfolio CITY
AP
PM (PRF-PM2) 7.3.1 I
612
Run Date: 05/2812025 - 18:02

Page 340 of 409 ends

--:,,t-' /C;/I +._-/.{_},
INDIAN ''} W\ELLS City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489

YTM YTM
365 Equiv.

CALIFORN IA
201 4, 201 5, 2016, 2020 Series
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2025
MarketPar Book oh ol Days to
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Rate of Return
Kevin Treasurer
Reporting period 03/01 /2025-03131 12025
5,191.60
5,191.60
March 31 Month Ending
5,191 .60
5,191.60
5,191.60 100.00
5,191.60 100.00%
Tem 360

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 14A
CP
PM (PRF PM1) 7.3.'ll
Report Ver. 7.3.1 1

0.00 998,135.63

0.00%
Run Date: 0t28/2025 - 19:42 No fiscal year history available

Page 341 of 409 ends

Average
201 4, 201 5, 2016, 2020 Series
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
March 31,2025
Purchase
Date
Stated

Page 1 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
custP lnvestment #
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
SYS28
SY526
SYS25
SYS27
SYS24
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
28 zo
25 27
1 lssuer
2014A Bonds Reserve
All Bond Series Principal
All Bond Series lnterest
All Bond Series Debt Svc
Cost Of lssuance Escrow
07to1t2023
07t01t2023
07to1t2023
07to1t2023
071o112023
Par Value

0.00 3,137.99
2,053.16

0.45 0.00
5,191.60
5,'t 91.60
Market Value

0.00 3,137.99
2,053.16

0.45 0.00
5,'t 91.60
5,191.60
Book Value

0.00 3,137.99
2,053.'16

0.45 0.00
5,191.60
5,191.60
Fitch 365

0.000

0.000
998,135.63
998,135.63
Portfolio 14A
CP
PM (PRF PM2) 7.3.11Run Date: 05/28/2025 - 19:42
Reporl Ver. 7.3.1 1

Page 342 of 409 ends

i4-. /I *-r'
\,-'WINDIAN ELLS 2015 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2025
Market
Value
City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA.92210
(760)346-2489

YTM YTM
CALIFORT.]IA
Par Book
Value
Yo ol
Portfolio
Days to
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Term 365360

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
1 .00 100.00

1.00 100.00%1

0.000

0.000
Total
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
of Return
Kevin Treasurer
Reporting period 03/01 /20254313'1 12025
March 31 Month

0.00 1.00

0.00%
Portfolio 15A
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.1 1
Report Ver. 7.3.'11
Run Date: 05/2812025 - 19:56 No fiscal year history available

Page 343 of 409 ends

2015 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
March 31,2025
Purchase Stated

Page 1 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
Maturity DatecuslPlnvestment #
Money Market Sweep/Checkin g Account
lssuer
2015 A Reserve
UBC Cost Of lssuance Escrow
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
Average
Balance

1.00 1.00
Market
SYS27
SYS22
27 22
07t01t2023
07t01t2023

1.00 0.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.00

0.000

1.00 1.00

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 15A
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.1 IRun Date: 05/28/2025 - 19:56
Report Ver. 7.3.1 1

Page 344 of 409 ends

-.lxi
S* *:t'tINDIAN Jt W ELLS City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489

YTM YTM
365 EquiY.

CALIFORNIA
2016 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2025
Market Book o/o ol
Portfolio
Days to
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return

1.00 1.00
March 31 Month Ending

1.00 1.00
1 .00 100.00

1.00 100.00%
Par
Value Term 360
I

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 16A
CP
PM (PRF_PMl) 7.3.1 I
Report Ver. 7.3.1 1

0.00 1.00

0.00%
60u,,,,"^***iFtr*rl-reasurer
Reporting period 03/01 /2025-03131 12025
Run Date: 0t28/2025 - 20:08 No fiscal year history available

Page 345 of 409 ends

Average
2016 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
March 31,2025
Purchase
Date
Stated

Page 1 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
custP lnvestment #lssuer
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
SYS28 1 UBC Cost Of lssuance Escrow
SYS33 2 Union Bank Reserve Account
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
07t01t2023
07to1t2023
Par Value

0.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Market Value

0.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Book Value

0.00 1.00

0.000

1.00 1.00
r.00

1.00 Portfolio 16A
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.1 1Run Date: 05/2812025 - 20:08
Report Ver. 7.3.1 1

Page 346 of 409 ends

INDIAN ELLS
i-- /
l'::. /d.\
\))w City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489

YTM YTM
365 Equiv.

0.000 0.000

CALIFORNIA
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Par
Value

1.00 1.00
2020 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2025
Market
Value

1.00 1.00
1 .00 100.00

1.00 100.00%
Book
Value
oh ol
Portfolio
Days to
Term
1 Tolal Earn
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Rate of Return
Treasuer
Reporting period 03/01 /2025-0313'1 12025
March 31 Month Ending

0.00 1.00

0.00%
Portfolio 20A
CP
PM (PRF_P|\41) 7.3.11
Report Ver- 7.3.1 1
Run Date: 05/2812025 - '19:07 No fiscal year history available

Page 347 of 409 ends

2020 A Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
March 31,2025
Purchase Stated YTM Daysto
Maturity
Page I
Maturity
DateCUSIPlnvestment #
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
SYSl
SY52
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
1 2
lssuer
2020 A Bonds COI
2020 A Bonds Reserve
Average
Balance

1.00 1.00
07t01t2023
07t01t2023
Market Value

1.00 1.00

0.00 1.00

0.000

0.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.000

0.000
Portfolio 20A
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.1 1Run Date:05/2812025 - 19:07
Report Ver. 7.3.1 '1

Page 348 of 409 ends

INDI AN WELLS 2022 Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2025
City of lndian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells CA92210
(760)346-2489CALIFORI.{}A
lnvestments
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
lnvestments
Par
Value
3,017,472.76
3,017,472.76
Market
Value
3,O17,472.76
3,017,472.76
Book
Value
oh oi
Portfolio Term
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
YTM
365 Equiv.

0.000

0.000
3,017,472.76 100.00
3,017,472.76 100.00%1
Total Earni
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective of Return
Kevin
Reporting period 03/01/2025-03131 12025
March 31 Month

0.00 4,834,211.31

0.00%
Portfolio 22
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.11
Report Ver. 7.3.1 1
Run Date: 04/2112025 -15i26 No fiscal year history available Page 349 of 409

2022 Bonds
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - lnvestments
March 31,2025
Purchase
Value
Stated

Page 1 ends

YTM Days to Maturity
365 Maturity Date

0.000

0.000 1

0.000
Portfolio 22
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.11
CUSIP lnvestment #
Money Market Sweep/Checking Account
SYS2
SYS4
SYSl
SYSS
SYS3
Subtotal and Ave6ge
Total and Average
2 4
1 6
3 lssuer
2022 Bonds COI
2022 Bonds lnterest
2022 Bonds Project Fund
2022 Bonds Redemption Fund
2022 Bonds Payment Fund
Average
Balance
4,834,211.31
4,8U,211.31
071o1t2023
0710112023
0710112023
07to1t2023

0.00 235,998.18
2,286,462.39
495,012.18

0.01 3,O17,472.76
3,017,472.76
Market Value

0.00 235,998.18
2,286,462.35
495,012.18

0.01 3,017,472.76
3,017,472.76
Book Value

0.00 235,998.1 I
2,286,462.39
495,012.18

0.01 3,017,472.76
3,O17,472.76
'.un Dale'. 0/.12112025 -'15:26 Page 350 of 409

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025

To: City Council
From: Finance Department
Prepared by: Kevin McCarthy, City Finance Director
Subject: Resolution Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments in the Fire Access Maintenance District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2025-26

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council OPENS the Public Hearing, takes any public testimony, CLOSES the Public Hearing; and

ADOPTS Resolution approving the annual levy of the Fire Access Maintenance District No. 1 for the Fiscal Year 2025-26; and

ORDERS the Fire Access Maintenance District No. 1 levy on the Fiscal Year 202 5-26 Riverside County tax roll; and

FINDS the project to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060.

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with annual procedural requirements, the City Council must conduct a duly noticed Public Hearing to receive comments from the public and subsequently adopt a Resolution authorizing the annual collection of levies for the Fire Access Maintenance District (FAMD) Special Parcel Tax. Upon adoption, the Resolution instructs the City’s Finance Director to transmit the approved levy to the County for inclusion on the property tax roll.

The Fire Access Maintenance District was established solely for the benefit of residents living within the gated community of the Indian Wells Country Club. In recognition of the specific nature of this benefit, it was determined that the authority to direct spending of District funds should rest with those residing within its boundaries. Governance of the FAMD is maintained through the election of a Board by residents of the District; however, the City Council remains responsible for adopting the annual Resolution to place the levy on the County tax roll, acting on behalf of the FAMD Board.

Page 351 of 409 ends

The funds collected through this levy support services within the district, including private security, street maintenance, landscaping, and capital improvements.

In 1973, the City Council was petitioned to consider converting public streets within the Indian Wells Country Club area to private roads. The Council approved the proposal by formally abandoning the public streets and incorporating them into a newly formed maintenance district. This action granted the City authority to impose a property tax to fund the district’s upkeep.

The Indian Wells Fire Access Maintenance District No. 1 (FAMD) is responsible for maintaining and operating access roadways, rights-of-way, and easements necessary for fire protection. Maintenance activities may include grading, paving, planking, macadamizing, graveling, oiling, and re-oiling, and the upkeep of barriers, gates, and other related infrastructure to ensure restricted use is maintained for emergency access.

Request for a Special Election

At its regularly scheduled meeting on January 9, 2025, the FAMD Board formally requested that the Indian Wells City Council authorize a special election to consider an annual FAMD tax levy increase. The Council unanimously approved the FAMD Board's request, scheduling a Special FAMD Election for May 6, 2025.

The increase is intended to ensure the continued provision of operational services within the District. Additionally, it seeks to establish a capital reserve program to address anticipated future capital improvement projects, thereby ensuring the District’s long-term sustainability.

The election was conducted as scheduled on May 6, 2025, in accordance with all applicable legal and procedural requirements. Of the ballots received, approximately 74% of participating voters supported the proposed increase to the FAMD special parcel tax, while 26% opposed the measure. The strong voter support reflects broad community recognition of the importance of maintaining high service levels within the District and proactively preparing for future infrastructure needs.

The favorable outcome authorizes the implementation of the proposed tax adjustment, which will allow the District to preserve and enhance core services such as private security, street and landscape maintenance, and emergency access infrastructure. In addition, the increased revenue will establish a dedicated capital reserve fund intended to support long- term capital improvement projects. This financial planning strategy will help ensure the District’s continued sustainability, reduce reliance on future emergency funding requests, and enable the Board to address aging infrastructure and other emerging needs in a timely and fiscally responsible manner.

Page 352 of 409 ends

FISCAL IMPACT:

FAMD is supported by two primary revenue sources: (1) property taxes, which generate approximately $465,000 annually, and (2) a voter-approved special assessment, which yields approximately $1,786,000 annually. These funds are deposited into a designated special revenue fund, ensuring expenditures are strictly limited to purposes consistent with the District’s mandate.

The FAMD special assessment is as follows:

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed by the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental regulations. The City, acting as the Lead Agency, determined that the ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment as there is no possibility that the action would result in a significant environmental impact, and because it does not constitute a “project” as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

Approved
Land Use Annual Tax
Residential Improved 1,514$
Residential Vacant Lot 1 Acre or less 1,029
Vacant Land greater than 1 acre 809
Golf Club / Golf Course 279,300$

Page 353 of 409 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS,

CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF A SPECIAL

TAX FOR THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS FIRE ACCESS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California (the “City Council”), by Ordinance No. 572 and previous Resolutions, has established procedures to replace in its entirety the parcel fee which has been levied annually against parcels of land within the Indian Wells Fire Access Maintenance District No. 1 (the “FAMD”) to finance security, street maintenance and repair, and entrance landscape services within the District; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution and pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California, held a Special Municipal Election on May 6, 2025, at which time the qualified electors of the District approved the rates stated in Ordinance No. 572 to finance security, street maintenance, and repair, and entrance landscape services within the FAMD; and WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial (the “Engineer”) to assist the City with the preparation of the annual levy and collection of special taxes by the FAMD; and WHEREAS, the Engineer has prepared the proposed levy and collection of special taxes upon eligible parcels of land within the FAMD, and the City Council has approved such special taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to levy and collect special taxes against parcels of land within the FAMD for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, to finance security, street maintenance and repair, and entrance landscape services within the FAMD; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing Notice was published in a newspaper of general circulation once at least fifteen (15) days before the public hearing on annual levies; a copy of the Public Hearing Notice was posted in three (3) public places within the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The Fire Access Maintenance District No. 1 special taxes be paid by the property owners to the City for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024, and ending June 30, 2025, shall be placed on the tax rolls for the County of Riverside and shall be as follows:

Residential
Land Use Assessment
Residential Improved $1,514 per unit per year
Residential Vacant Lot 1 acre or less $1,029 per unit per year Vacant Land greater than 1 acre $809 per acre per year
ATTACHMENT #1

Page 354 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Resolution No. 2025-__

Page 2 ends

Golf Club / Golf Course

The amount of the tax imposed each fiscal year for the Golf Club / Golf Course shall be $279,300.

SECTION 2. The above rates shall be effective July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026.

SECTION 3. The County Auditor of the County of Riverside shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each eligible parcel of land the amount of levy set forth herein, and such levies shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the levy shall be paid to the City Treasurer.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at an adjourned regular meeting held on this 10th day of June 2025.

________________________________

BRUCE WHITMAN
MAYOR

CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 2025-__

I, Angelica Avila, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five (5); that the above and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells the 10th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________ ___________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN FOR

CITY CLERK BEST, BEST, & KRIEGER

CITY ATTORNEY

Page 355 of 409 ends

Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025

To: City Council
From: Public Works Department
Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, Public Works Director
Subject: Selection of Design Components for Safer Streets Program Along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council REVIEWS the Planning Commission recommended Right-of-Way improvements along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Cook Street and Rancho Palmeras; and

PROVIDES individual motions for design improvements for each of the four corridors; and

AUTHORIZE staff to solicit proposals for a design consultant; and

FINDS the action exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 21080.20, and Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

DISCUSSION:

Over the past few years, the City of Indian Wells has been developing the Safer Streets Program, which was identified to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, seek opportunities to reduce speeding in the community, and address unsafe vehicular activities in the residential areas. The project is a result of residents expressing concerns about traffic issues in this area of the City, specifically along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street. These concerns were also reiterated during the community engagement process for the City-Wide Traffic Safety Study and the Safer Streets outreach.

From February 2023 to May 2025, the City conducted 18 meetings related to Safer Streets. This includes City Council, Planning Commission, Strategic Planning, and Community Engagement Meetings to seek community input to receive input from the public and provide feedback on potential improvements.

Page 356 of 409 ends

Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025

Initially, the project was separated into two phases with Phase I consisting of Eldorado Drive and Fairway Drive, and Phase II consisting of Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street.

At this year’s City Council Strategic Planning Session, the City Council combined the two projects to develop a comprehensive project that would provide a clear perspective of the proposed improvements to each corridor. Community feedback was provided via the City’s website, public testimony at the meetings, emails, etc.

On May 29, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission was presented the combined phases of the project, including a report on stop sign warrants.

Based on previous direction to analyze potential stop signs at the intersections on each of the four corridors, a traffic engineer conducted a Stop Warrant Study to determine if additional stop signs were “warranted” under the conditions established under state traffic laws. Based on the preliminary results of the study, none of the 18 intersections qualified for additional stop signs. Once the draft study has been finalized, it will be available on the Safer Streets website.

The following information is presented as follows: Phase I streets from the Public’s perspective then the Planning Commission’s recommendation followed by Phase II streets with the Public‘s perspective followed by the Planning Commission’s recommendation.

It is important to note that throughout the community meetings, numerous compliments were given to Riverside County Sheriff’s Department for their traffic enforcement efforts.

However, a common theme from the community was a desire to increase traffic enforcement throughout the community.

Phase I (Fairway Drive and Eldorado Drive):

 Fairway Drive

Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:

 Fairway Drive (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Construct a meandering sidewalk along the south side of Fairway Drive for pedestrian safety.
o Sidewalk to be constructed out of a colored permeable concrete that looks like decomposed granite versus a conventional concrete sidewalk. o Stripe Fairway Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction, provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only), and maintain street parking on the north side of Fairway Drive.

Page 357 of 409 ends

Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025

 Fairway Drive (Planning Commission Recommendation):

Planning Commission concurred with the Staff Presented Design Components listed above but also included additional recommendations.

o Specified that the sidewalk should be 8 foot wide.
o Addition of crosswalks connecting Fairway to Cook Street and Eldorado Drive. The inclusion of crosswalks connecting Fairway to Cook Street and Eldorado Drive are subject to state law for pedestrian safety. Additional research is needed to confirm if crosswalks can be installed that connect pedestrian improvements to non- pedestrian improved areas.

 Fairway Drive (Other Items)

Other items discussed at community meetings but not advanced by the Planning Commission.

o Discussion on potential to add speed bumps/humps along Fairway, and additional crosswalks on Fairway at Cielito, Williams and Rancho Palmeras.

o The level of meandering path between Cook and Eldorado will be based upon the level of participation from Eldorado Country Club and Vintage Club. At this time, Eldorado Country Club has been open to having the meandering sidewalk in front of their property, while Vintage Club has expressed concerns. Moving forward, staff will work closely with both clubs to ascertain a willingness to expand beyond the City’s right-of-way along Fairway to increase the level of meandering and curb adjacent landscaping into the design.

 Eldorado Drive

Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:

 Eldorado Drive (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Implement a road diet by striping Eldorado Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only).
o No sidewalk on either side of the street nor reduction of pavement along Eldorado.

Rather, provide more striping that creates a wide buffer between bicycle/golfcart lane and vehicular traffic.
o No interest in revisiting pedestrian paths down the middle of the street.

Page 358 of 409 ends

Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025

 Eldorado Drive (Planning Commission Recommendation):

Planning Commission eliminated the Staff Presented Design Components listed above but instead included new recommendations.

o Addition of a meandering sidewalk from Highway 111 to Camino Cielo on the west side of Eldorado to the entrance of the Sundance community to mirror the Montelena Community sidewalk.
o Examine the addition of a northbound right turn pocket at Highway 111. o Install crosswalks at Fairway Drive crossing each leg of the intersection to Fairway Park. Additional research is needed to confirm whether these crosswalks can be installed, as they too connect pedestrian improvements to non-pedestrian improved areas.

 Eldorado Drive (Other Items)

Other items discussed at community meetings but not advanced by the Planning Commission.

 Reduce Eldorado Drive from two lanes in each direction and relocate curbs into existing number 2 travel lane to increase the landscape buffer on each side.  Construct a meandering sidewalk on the west side of Eldorado Drive.

Phase II (Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street):

 Rancho Palmeras

Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:

 Rancho Palmeras (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Construct a left turn pocket on southbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.
o Construct a sidewalk on the west side of Rancho Palmeras for pedestrian safety. o Stripe Rancho Palmeras to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction.

 Rancho Palmeras (Planning Commission Recommendation):

o Accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). o Construct a left turn pocket on southbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.

Page 359 of 409 ends

Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025

o Construct a right turn pocket on northbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.

 Cook Street

Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:

 Cook Street (Staff Presented Design Components):

o Implement a road diet and add meandering sidewalks on both sides of Cook Street.
o Striping to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only).  The final design would include a two-lane to one-lane transition in both north and southbound lanes near Highway 111.

 Cook Street (Planning Commission Recommendation):

o Implement a road diet and add meandering sidewalk on east side of Cook Street.

 Cook Street (Other Items)

Additional discussion at community meetings about traffic traveling eastbound along Highway 111 not obeying the right turn-only lane at Cook Street. Staff indicated that this is a separate project that will be examined at a later date.

Further traffic analysis needs to be conducted on additional Planning Commission recommendations for traffic signage on Cook Street and no right turn on red at Highway 111 onto Cook Street.

Addition of a camera at IW Coffee Building needs further discussion on purpose of camera, legal restrictions of placing on private property, costs for storage or footage, etc.

Page 360 of 409 ends

Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025

Planning Commission also recommended additional traffic enforcement for traffic violations.

With the completion of community outreach and Planning Commission providing a holistic series of recommendations for Safer Streets, as well as the necessary CEQA and consistency of this project to the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, staff is seeking Council’s direction on the final design elements for each segment: Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street.

Residents are encouraged to learn more about the Safer Street project , community meetings held, public comments and other documents related to the project at https://www.cityofindianwells.org/city-hall/departments/public-works/safer-streets- indian-wells

OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options:

 Approve the Planning Commission recommendations as listed above, and direct staff to advertise for a design firm;
 Approve the Planning Commission recommendations with modifications, and direct staff to advertise for a design firm;
 Decide to not move forward with the project; or
 Provide alternative directions.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOALS:

At the 2025 Strategic Planning session, the City Council reaffirmed its 2024 directive and instructed staff to continue advancing the Safer Streets initiative as one of the City Council’s Strategic Goals.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This report seeks Council approval to solicit a design contract for Safer Streets. Once the design has been completed, staff will return with project costs for separate discussion and approval. Funds to develop the design and initial construction costs totaling $7.5 million have been approved in Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program budget.

It is important to note that the City has successfully secured approximately $3.5 million in grant funds for the various segments of the project, with additional funding ($9.6 million) being sought. Those grants that have been awarded or recently applied for allow for a change in scope of the project to be completed. Grant funding may be reduced or

Page 361 of 409 ends

Revised Staff Report
Posted: June 6, 2025

increased depending on the final change of scope and subject to approval by the awarding agency.

Street repaving is needed on all four corridors of Safer Streets. If Safer Streets Project does not move forward, staff will seek a preliminary budget of $3 million to design and repave Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Cook Street, and Rancho Palmeras in the comin g months.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. The City, acting as Lead Agency, has determined that Under California Public Resources Code section 21080.20, CEQA does not apply to active transportation plans, pedestrian plans and bicycle transportation plans.

Furthermore, the proposed improvements within the existing street rights-of-way are categorically exempt under CEQA in accordance with Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, for Existing Facilities, including streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Cook Exhibits

2. Fairway Exhibits

3. Eldorado Exhibits

4. Rancho Palmeras Exhibits

Page 362 of 409 ends

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025
To: City Council
From: Public Works Department
Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, Public Works Director
Subject: Selection of Design Components for Safer Streets Program Along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council REVIEWS the Planning Commission recommended Right-of-Way improvements along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Cook Street and Rancho Palmeras; and PROVIDES individual motions for design improvements for each of the four corridors; and
AUTHORIZE staff to solicit proposals for a design consultant; and FINDS the action exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 21080.20, and Section 15301, Class 1 (c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

DISCUSSION:

Page 363 of 409 ends

Initially, the project was separated into two phases with Phase I consisting of Eldorado Drive and Fairway Drive, and Phase II consisting of Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street.

On May 29, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission was presented the combined phases of the project, including a report on stop sign warrants.

It is important to note that throughout the community meetings, numerous compliments were given to Riverside County Sheriff’s Department for their traffic enforcement efforts.

However, a common theme from the community was a desire to increase traffic enforcement throughout the community.

Phase I (Fairway Drive and Eldorado Drive):
Fairway Drive
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:
Fairway Drive (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Construct a meandering sidewalk along the south side of Fairway Drive for pedestrian safety.
o Sidewalk to be constructed out of a colored permeable concrete that looks like decomposed granite versus a conventional concrete sidewalk. o Stripe Fairway Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction, provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only), and maintain street parking on the north side of Fairway Drive.

Page 364 of 409 ends

Fairway Drive (Planning Commission Recommendation):

Planning Commission concurred with the Staff Presented Design Components listed above but also included additional recommendations.
o Specified that the sidewalk should be 8 foot wide.
o Addition of crosswalks connecting Fairway to Cook Street and Eldorado Drive. The inclusion of crosswalks connecting Fairway to Cook Street and Eldorado Drive are subject to state law for pedestrian safety. Additional research is needed to confirm if crosswalks can be installed that do not connect pedestrian improvements to non-pedestrian improved areas.
Fairway Drive (Other Items)
Other items discussed at community meetings but not advanced by the Planning Commission.
o Discussion on potential to add speed bumps/humps along Fairway, and additional crosswalks on Fairway at Cielito, Williams and Rancho Palmeras. o The level of meandering path between Cook and Eldorado will be based upon the level of participation from Eldorado Country Club and Vintage Club. At this time, Eldorado Country Club has been open to having the meandering sidewalk in front of their property, while Vintage Club has expressed concerns. Moving forward, staff will work closely with both clubs to ascertain a willingness to expand beyond the City’s right-of-way along Fairway to increase the level of meandering and curb adjacent landscaping into the design.
Eldorado Drive
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:
Eldorado Drive (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Implement a road diet by striping Eldorado Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only).
o No sidewalk on either side of the street nor reduction of pavement along Eldorado.

Rather, provide more striping that creates a wide buffer between bicycle/golfcart lane and vehicular traffic.
o No interest in revisiting pedestrian paths down the middle of the street.

Page 365 of 409 ends

Eldorado Drive (Planning Commission Recommendation):

Planning Commission concurred with the Staff Presented Design Components listed above but also included additional recommendations.
o Addition of a meandering sidewalk from Highway 111 to Camino Cielo on the west side of Eldorado to the entrance of the Sundance community to mirror the Montelena Community sidewalk.
o Examine the addition of a northbound right turn pocket at Highway 111. o Install crosswalks at Fairway Drive crossing each leg of the intersection to Fairway Park. Additional research is needed to confirm whether these crosswalks can be installed, as they too do not connect pedestrian improvements to non-pedestrian improved areas.
Eldorado Drive (Other Items)
Other items discussed at community meetings but not advanced by the Planning Commission.
Reduce Eldorado Drive from two lanes in each direction and relocate curbs into existing number 2 travel lane to increase the landscape buffer on each side. Construct a meandering sidewalk on the west side of Eldorado Drive.

Phase II (Rancho Palmeras and Cook Street):
Rancho Palmeras
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:
Rancho Palmeras (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Construct a left turn pocket on southbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.
o Construct a sidewalk on the west side of Rancho Palmeras for pedestrian safety. o Stripe Rancho Palmeras to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction.
Rancho Palmeras (Planning Commission Recommendation):
o Accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). o Construct a left turn pocket on southbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.

Page 366 of 409 ends

o Construct a right turn pocket on northbound Rancho Palmeras at the Camino de Plata intersection.
Cook Street
Based on the results from public engagement, Staff understood the community’s preference to be:
Cook Street (Staff Presented Design Components):
o Implement a road diet and add meandering sidewalks on both sides of Cook Street.
o Striping to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). The final design would include a two-lane to one-lane transition in both north and southbound lanes near Highway 111.
Cook Street (Planning Commission Recommendation):
o Implement a road diet and add meandering sidewalk on east side of Cook Street.

Curb to be rounded.
o Striping to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). o Camera installation on IW Coffee Building to monitor traffic and speeds. o Appropriate signage on northbound and southbound Cook Street providing advanced notice of the upcoming merge from two to one lane. o “No U-turn” signage on southbound Cook Street on median noses at Indian Wells Village.
o Eastbound Highway 111 to southbound Cook Street right turn restriction – No turn on Red
Cook Street (Other Items)
Additional discussion at community meetings about traffic traveling eastbound along Highway 111 not obeying the right turn-only lane at Cook Street. Staff indicated that this is a separate project that will be examined at a later date.

Further traffic analysis needs to be conducted on additional Planning Commission recommendations for traffic signage on Cook Street and no right turn on red at Highway 111 onto Cook Street.

Addition of a camera at IW Coffee Building needs further discussion on purpose of camera, legal restrictions of placing on private property, costs for storage or footage, etc.

Page 367 of 409 ends

Planning Commission also recommended additional traffic enforcement for traffic violations.

The City Council has the following options:
Approve the Planning Commission recommendations as listed above, and direct staff to advertise for a design firm;
Approve the Planning Commission recommendations with modifications, and direct staff to advertise for a design firm;
Decide to not move forward with the project; or
Provide alternative directions.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOALS:

FISCAL IMPACT:

Page 368 of 409 ends

increased depending on the final change of scope and subject to approval by the awarding agency.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

ATTACHMENTS:

1.Cook Exhibits

2.Fairway Exhibits

3.Eldorado Exhibits

4.Rancho Palmeras Exhibits

Page 369 of 409 ends

655 West Broadway
Suite 1600
San Diego, CA 92101
619.219.5335 Phone
858.351.6808 Direct
[email protected] June 9, 2025
VIA E-MAIL ([email protected])
Members of the City Council
The City of Indian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
Indian Wells, CA 92210
Re: June 10, 2025 City Council Agenda Item I.1: Selection of Design Components for Safer Streets Program Along Fairway Drive, Eldorado Drive, Rancho Palmeras, and Cook Street
Dear Sirs:

This letter follows correspondence sent to the City Attorney, Todd Leishman, on February 12, 2025 and May 12, 2025 regarding the City of Indian Wells’ (“City”) proposed improvements on Fairway Drive adjacent to The Vintage Club (“The Vintage”). Despite conversations with Mr. Leishman and attempted communications between The Vintage and City staff, it appears the Planning Commission has recommended the City Council adopt a design that encroaches on land that does not belong to the City and on which the City has no right to build a sidewalk. To make The Vintage’s position perfectly clear: The Vintage adamantly opposes the construction of any sidewalk on the South side of Fairway Drive adjacent to The Vintage property.

The Vintage is not the only constituent opposed to these sidewalks. The Staff Report presented to the Planning Commission on May 29, 2025 states that “[b]ased on feedback from the City’s website, emails, and comments at the community meetings, Planning Commission has recommended the following for Fairway Drive: 1) Construct a walkway along the south side of Fairway Drive for pedestrian safety, 2) Stripe Fairway Drive to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction, provide a combination bicycle/golfcart lane in each direction, and maintain parking on the north side of Fairway Drive.” The community feedback, presented in the form of various attachments to the Staff Report, reflects community members seeking a solution: for people “running red lights, speeding through the intersection of Highway 111 and Cook S;” to “dragstrip 111;” to “increase patrolling our roads;” for the “east bound traffic of Highway 111;” City Council Meeting:

June 10, 2025 - Public Comments
General Business Item I.1

Members of the City Council
June 9, 2025

Page 2 ends

for “[t]oo many people…running lights that have already turned red.” Many respondents implored the City to install speed humps. One commenter noted that “[t]he interactive questionnaire did not provide traffic calming choices. I’m not sure how meaningful the answers can be as nothing addressed the public’s number one concern of reducing speeding traffic.” Another resident of Fairway Drive stated “I feel [the proposals] will change the look of our beautiful community while not addressing the excessive speed problem.” Community members also expressed that a sidewalk on Fairway “might need some accommodation with other properties of The Vintage and Eldorado CC, depending on actual ownership of that area;” that, “as a resident on Fairway I would be concerned that you might be looking at encroaching on m y property.” One of the public commenters at the May 29, 2025 meeting who is opposed to the sidewalks cited a statistic that there has not been a single vehicular/pedestrian fatality in the City’s history.

Nevertheless, at the Planning Commission meeting on May 29, 2025, staff presented a design to the Commission that reflects a “meandering sidewalk” that not only runs the entire length of the South side of Fairway, it also encroaches onto The Vintage property. Nor does the design rendering shown to the Planning Commission take into consideration the significant “bulb out” that staff intends to construct at the corner of Cook and Fairway directly in front of the entrance to The Vintage, also on property the City does not own. This was noted by the City Manager in the January 30, 2025 City Council meeting—that the project appeared to go outside the curb limits, and additional clarity may be needed. Yet the City never even attempted to seek that clarity.

The Vintage has repeatedly asked the City to provide surveys and title information indicating the extent of the City’s right-of-way and that the City does in fact have the right to construct a sidewalk as proposed to the City Council. In response, The Vintage has been provided with the enclosed tract map from 1979 that does not clearly show the City’s right of way to extend far enough to support the design rendering being presented to the City Council.

The Vintage has been informed this is the extent of the City’s documentation to support its claim of a right of way sufficient to support the proposed design. In light of the fact that the City is anticipating encroaching onto private property, this is woefully insufficient.

Prior to the Planning Commission meeting on May 29, 2025, Randy Ankeny, Executive Director of The Vintage Club Community Association, relayed to Ken Seumalo, Director of Public Works for the City, that The Vintage remains opposed to the proposed sidewalk and that even with a straight sidewalk rather than a meandering one, The Vintage property will still be required for a continuous sidewalk according to the plans presented. When asked if The Vintage would be provided with a survey or title information, Mr. Seumalo stated that the Council has not allocated any funding for such information. Respectfully, the Council is obligated to ascertain that the City has the right to construct improvements on property it does not own, and has failed to do so in this situation. Should the City construct a sidewalk on private property

Members of the City Council
June 9, 2025

Page 3 ends

where it has no right to do so, The Vintage will pursue all remedies available, including filing a lawsuit for inverse condemnation and seeking a preliminary injunction.

Nevertheless, Mr. Seumalo proceeded to present to the Planning Commission not that The Vintage is entirely opposed to any sidewalk whatsoever, but simply that the City does not presently have The Vintage’s “permission” to construct a meandering sidewalk that encroaches on its property. In response, Commissioner Laks inquired as to the width of the right of way for a sidewalk between the curb and the end of the right of way. Mr. Seumalo answered that “it varies, but we have no less than 10 feet….I can get you the exact number.” Unfortunately, it is not clear at all to The Vintage, or apparently, to the City, where the exact limits of the right of way are.

Also in response to Mr. Seumalo’s presentation, Commissioner Snellenberger stated that the City should install a meandering sidewalk anyway, and that if The Vintage sees that the City is going to do it anyway, they might just decide to give the City the land after all. This is not a realistic assessment, nor a legal means for expanding the City’s right of way into private property.

Agenda Item I.1 for the June 10, 2025 City Council meeting recommends that the City Council review the recommended improvements for Fairway Drive, provide individual motions for design improvements for each corridor, authorize staff to solicit proposals for a design consultant, and find the action exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Vintage suggests the City Council move to eliminate the sidewalk on Fairway Drive. Should the City Council decide that a sidewalk on the South side of Fairway Drive is in fact necessary, The Vintage demands the City Council authorize funding for an updated survey to ascertain the actual limits of the City’s right of way as it relates to the adjacent private property belonging to The Vintage. Without such a survey, the City is simply estimating its right of way and risking legal action for the unconstitutional taking of private property.

We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,

BUCHALTER
A Professional Corporation
Emily S. Chaidez

IN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
TRACT N0 14968
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 22, THE NORTH ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 PORTIONS OF LOTS 224-227, ELDORADO GOLF CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 6, M.B. 38/60-64, RECORDS OF JONES- TILLSON 81 ASSOCIATES

OWNER'S CERTIFICATE

WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED

WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON, THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS

WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND, AND

THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN WITHIN THE COLORED BORDER.

WE HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION TO PUBLIC USE LOT "E" AS AN

ADDITIONAL DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET FOR FAIRWAY DRIVE AND LOTS "F"AND "G" FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, WATER LINE AND EMERGENCY ACCESS PURPOSES.

WE ALSO HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION EASEMENTS TO PUBLIC USE FOR

STORM DRAINAGE, SEWER, PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND EMERGENCY ACCESS AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP.

WE ALSO HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION FOR SEWER, WATER AND PUBLIC

UTILITY PURPOSES, WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SERVICE AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES, THOSE PRIVATE STREETS SHOWN AS LOTS "A" THROUGH "D" INCLUSIVE.

WE HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS CERTAIN

WATER LINE EASEMENTS FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, DELINEATED ON SAID MAP AS "W.L.E."

WE ALSO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS CERTAIN IRRIGATION MAIN EASEMENTS, DELINEATED ON SAID MAP AS "I.M.E."

INDIAN WELLS ASSOCIATES - A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BY: VINTAGE PROPERTIES - INDIAN WELLS, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

ITS GENERAL PARTNER
BY:

TRUSTEE
BY : Sle,s12y)14(Z. C SECRERETARY

CONTINENTAL AUXILIARY COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UND PEED OF TRUST RECORDED APRIL 27, 1979, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 85990 I IAL RECORDS.

BY: BY:

PRESIDENT

TRUSTEE
4004s-
AgMAIS f SECRETARY

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA -CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED APRIL 27, 1979, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 85988, OFFICIAL RECORDS.

BY
SIDENT
BY:

COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
A PUBLIC AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

THE UNDERSIGNED, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC

AGENCY, HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT IT IS INTERESTED IN THE LAND

SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP BY VIRTUE OF EASEMENTS FOR WATER LINES, ROADS, ACCESS AND STORMWATER PURPOSES, RECORDED APRIL 6; 1964, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 42115 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; SEPTEMBER 18, 1974, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 120760 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; JULY 14, 1964, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 85578 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; MARCH 31, 1933, IN BOOK 116, PAGE 593 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; AND MAY 26, 1932, IN BOOK 78, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, (OF WHICH EASEMENT PARCELS 1 AND 2 PER ABOVE INSTRUMENT NO. 42115 ARE BLANKET EASEMENTS WITH NO

LOCATION SET FORTH AND CANNOT BE PLOTTED ON MAP) AND CONSENTS TO

THE PREPARATION AND RECORDING OF THIS MAP, AND ACCEPTS FOR THE USE

AND BENEFIT OF SAID PUBLIC AGENCY, EASEMENTS FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES DELINEATED ON SAID MAP AS "W.L.E,"AND FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES LOTS "A" THROUGH "D", INCLUSIVE, AND L0TS"F" AND "G".

COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

BERNARDINE SUTTON -SECRETARY

TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF ' (,00 0•06
- HAS

BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH AND DULY APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

CONDITIONED UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY,

MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS

TAXES, WHICH AT THE TIME OF THE FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER, ARE LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE.

DATED 3 1980 .

DONALD D. SULLIVAN

COUNTY CLERK AND EX -OFFICIO CLERK OF THE

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BY

TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS

OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE

ANNEXED MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL

ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESS-

MENTS NOW A LIEN NOT YET PAYABLE WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE s9, 000
fca2ca4R.1! 13 198'0.

DATED /

DONNA BOUER BABCOCK - COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
BY la 2e4a. (.62J _
DEPUTY
MIMI
i

ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTHWEST

EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

SEPTEMBER 1979
SHEET I OF 8 SHEETS

RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE
FILED THIS o1O
19 'o AT 1:o AM.

OF MAPS AT PAGES
DAY OF rnq-R.c/-I
IN BOOK /12

THE REQUEST OF THE AT
FEE
NO.

SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE - FIRST

AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
COUNTY CLERK.
535'97
W. D. BALOUGH

COUNTY RECORDER
BY: f-IN Q..

DEPUT Ill

CIVIL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A REGISTERED.. CIVIL ENGINEER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF 8 SHEETS

CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION DURING SEPTEMBER 1979, AND THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON ACTUALLY

EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN, OR WILL BE' IN PLACE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF RECORDATION OF THIS MAP. THE MONUMENTS ARE

SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED AND THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.

JAN 30 /080
DATED

CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE
RDON A. TILLSON, R.C.E. 8720

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND FIND IT TO BE

SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AS FILED, AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION; THAT

ALL PROVISIONS OF THE STATE LAWS AND CITY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

HAVE BEEN COMPILED WITH, AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
f/arGh 3 J9g,
DATED
PE E J. D V' , - .C. . 21.668
CITY ENGI EER, CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, CA.

PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE
THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 14968 WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS AT ITS MEETING HELD ON THE ZC1" DAY OF 34.).1.4 19111 _ -
MAREw -11 14:g0
DATED DAVID G. SCHEY

DIRECTOR OF PLANN
INDIAN WELLS, CA.

CITY OF

CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATE

RESOLVED THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF B SHEETS BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY ADOPTED AS OFFICIAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 149684AND THE CITY

OF INDIAN WELLS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS HEREBY APPROVES SAID MAP.

THE CITY CLERK IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO ATTEST SAID

MAP BY SIGNING HIS NAME THERETO AS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF

INDIAN WELLS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TO AFFIX THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF THE CITY THERETO.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING MINUTE ORDER WAS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, STATE.QF CALIFORNIA, AT ITS MEETING HELD /4 ON THE 4*DAY OF !/6!%S/ 19 .

DATED PRINCE E.'PIERSON

CITY MANAGER, CITY CLERK, CITY OF
INDIAN WELLS, CA.

SOIL REPORT

A PRELIMINARY SOIL REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ON THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1978 AS REQUIRED BY THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE.

C�2 81- 117 , Lo+- r 5
NB 1l2 / 7

IN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
TRACT N0. 14968-I
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 22, THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 224-227, ELDORADO GOLF CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 6, M.B. 38/6O-64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

JONES- TILLSON & ASSOCIATES I SEPTEMBER 1979

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS:

COUNTY OF Soul ()a,+e. o )
ON THIS 304-h DAY OF :5-Q►1444LOL 191RQ , BEFORE ME,

THE UNDERSIGNED A NOTARY PUBLIC IN ARD FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE PERSONALLY APPEARED ,% ichiLm( 1. Hu Age s KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE

PRESIDENT, AND S KNOWN TO ME
TO BE THE SECRE A 0 IN AGE PR E IES - INDIAN WELLS, A

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN

INSTRUMENT AND KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSONS WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN

INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, SAID CORPORATION BEING

KNOWN TO ME TO BE ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF INDIAN WELLS ASSOCIATES - A

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, THE PARTNERSHIP THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN

INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS SUCH PARTNER AND THAT SUCH PARTNERSHIP EXECUTED THE SAME.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.

SIGNATURE
Alt), 5e-RA/A)
NAME
MY COMMISSION EXPIRESA;121/f/n3 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE.

OFFICIAL SEAL

CINDI SERBIN

NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA
Principal Office in SAN MATEO County
My Commission Expires Feb. 19, 1983

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS:

COUNTY OF , :04(Arei.t,vs sy )
ON THIS 12 DAY OF /� , 191_1E, BEFORE ME, THE
UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY P I�,� AND FOR S ID COUNTYAND STATE, PERSONA Y AP ARED . filf• il�u� , KNOWN TO ME TO
BE THE !!+r PRES E AND ,
KNOWN ME 0 BE THE A OF CO AL

AUXILIARY COMPANY, A ALIFORNIA CORPORATION, THE CORPORATION THAT

EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS TRUSTEE, AND KNOWN TO ME TO BE

THE PERSONS WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE

CORPORATION THEREIN NAMED, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
)t41.401,0606 .1e!
AhveAfAs L •y r••.,
NAME

SIGNATURE
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES /-'4-11.1
OF~!C1AL MAL

NORMAL CANTORA

NOTARY MANX C - CALIFORNIA

SANFTMOWOCOWN
My cemm. wins MM 1 MN

NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID

COUNTY AND STATE

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS:

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
ON THIS 1 #11DAY OF q.

UNDERSIGN D, A NOTARY PU L2
PERSONALLY APPEARED 0 1el. (1).

TO BE THE P�ESIDENT
AND

KNOWN TO ECALIFORNI SECRE OF FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
A
, 19W, BEFORE ME, THE -

OR AI SD COUNTY AND STATE,
, KNOWN TO ME
1)1i
Q -ThOirta
�

INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, THE CORPORATION THAT

EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS TRUSTEE, AND KNOWN TO ME TO BE

THE PERSONS WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE

CORPORATION THEREIN NAMED, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL

SIGNATURE
��iYOIO!{I!)IIi.R1UY1flI11tY1�13t11II 13t�9! Ssi€I�il'!II illt ::s!trt _6 ¢. '�-Itli. _.m 1/431ANA V. MORONES
RI7'.'? DE. COUNT?
a.N'1 Cornmson Expires August 27, 1982 g
it+I�aq�nt�anni�eu!u�m�miru;�ninironuw;au��nnnn.:nummuErusex�f LIRA/no. V. Mmmu0i
i bI AA(A V. /Y\OaON E S
NAME

NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY

AND STATE
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES g-.7
0 e�-

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
ON THIS -6 DAY OF February , 1980, BEFORE ME THE

UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED ,rna rd i no S .d+oh , KNOWN TO ME TO BE

THE SECRETARY OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT,

A PUBLIC AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND KNOWN TO ME TO

BE THE PERSON WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF

SAID PUBLIC AGENCY AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH PUBLIC AGENCY EXECUTED THE SAME.

WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
SIGNATURE >9.2":„*.L4L

MYRI ALEXANDER
NAME

NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 8� 1985 COUNTY AND STATE.

GoP`'S 1184
SHEET 2 OF 8 SHEETS

SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 (C) (1) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT THE

SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED SINCE THEIR INTEREST CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OWNER OF RIGHTS OF WAY FOR DITCHES AND CANALS, RECORDED AUGUST 22, 1922. IN BOOK 8, PAGE 272 OF PATENTS; JANUARY 27, 1923, IN BOOK 8, PAGE 298 OF PATENTS; DECEMBER 28, 1924, IN BOOK 9, PAGE 71 OF PATENTS; OCTOBER 9, 1926, IN BOOK 9, PAGE 173 OF PATENTS; AND MAY 12, 1975, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 54303, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, ALL OF WHICH ARE BLANKET EASEMENTS WITH NO LOCATION SET FORTH AND CANNOT BE PLOTTED ON MAP.

SOUTHERN

CONDUITS

OFFICIAL

OFFICIAL
RECORDS;
RECORDS;
RECORDS;
RECORDS.

CALIFORNIA EDISON CO., OWNER OF EASEMENTS FOR POLES AND , RECORDED DECEMBER 16, 1932, IN BOOK 97, PAGE 174 OF
RECORDS; AUGUST 25, 1944, IN BOOK 638, PAGE 252 OF
RECORDS; MAY 11, 1951, IN BOOK 1270, PAGE 335, OF
RECORDS; MAY 19, 1947, IN BOOK 831, PAGE 515, OF OFFICIAL AUGUST 11, 1961, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 69014 OF OFFICIAL
DECEMBER 10, 1959, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 104987 OF OFFICIAL AND APRIL 14, 1961 PER INSTRUMENT NO. 32170 OF OFFICIAL ELDORADO COUNTRY CLUB WATER CO., OWNER OF EASEMENTS FOR ROADS, UTILITIES, WATER LINES AND ACCESS, RECORDED JUNE 30, 1961, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 56490 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, OF WHICH EASEMENT PARCELS 7 AND 9 THEREOF ARE BLANKET EASEMENTS WITH NO LOCATION SET FORTH AND CANNOT BE PLOTTED ON MAP.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, OWNER OF EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC ROADS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES, RECORDED DECEMBER 7, 1959, IN BOOK 2594, PAGE 355 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; JULY 25, 1966, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 76059 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; APRIL 26, 1966, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 43733 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; AND AUGUST 24, 1965, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 97730 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

SOUTHERN PACIFIC LAND CO., OWNER OF MINERAL RIGHTS AND AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED AUGUST 1, 1962, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 72133 O:

OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH IS A BLANKET EASEMENT WITH NO LOCATION SET FORTH AND CANNOT BE PLOTTED ON MAP.
i
tl8//2/8

GOP k
/339.3/' (Rec. /339.5' R.S. /fir/(*O1

IN TH CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
TR AC
OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SEC ION 22, THE 96
-
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS p NORTH ONE-HALF AN THE S UTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE

DORADO ONE-HALF

UBFESTATESNUNIIT TOWNSHIP
M.B. 38/60 64,�RECORDS F R'IVERSIDERCOUNDT , STATEDIOF CALPORTIONS RNIA NS OF LOTS 224-227,

JONES-TILLSON & ASSOCIATES
/11.# Cor. Sec. 29 fd • U.S.G.1.

Brass Cap down /3°ivith two
ties (Nail f Tags R.C.E.
9503)- 9t'
UV Col= Sec "28 Fd. U.S.G.L.O. Brass Tract No. 12/84
: Ga: flv in runes oriented .ff.d... 42/5-6

PA/AWAY
#89'58'45 M' G C•W 90° t(Cap �Y... r ? L/MITS� :.y
2642.78' -_ . - 619°59954 E, ' .3 1 s 2642.91 ' • . I . - I I /386.33.
/'TTV / TAATTC /256.43' --;
• , (Rec. /384-.35' per ;
Gov't. Township
' Plat dated 5/3/68)

PALM DESERT
•ha
car. S29/528
, Fd. 3 ",:p. down

0.5' per 8.6. /6/6c►.
v (No fog)
a
a
m
M
a.. h
Z
o u Ct/'. See.18
c Nothing Found
.' or Set--- -- s�
�fi°i- - -
I
266/.93' ---
' w4� Cor: S'ec.28
Fd. 2 x2 flush
o aver 3/4
,ate down /7'per
o+ � 04 R s. /6/60 f Tr•
7:,;10 � j7ii2MB
o�b (/Vo td9)
hti
��b
it1 e'
-N0•55' 40
�jZ b

0. �-S jb Cor. East Lr'ne
:ft. 29, Al. 3,4"
• ' 1.p. f(ush, per
R. S• /6/60•
(No fag)
a
N
0 N
N
ell MD OP
INDIAN !1/ELLS
NO/'22'37"W
-,.L.
h
4 A10•4/125 -If/
/.5' deep
/n Wash Area. No tag
' 1 no re ference

6.42'East / 0.06'Seuth
/.,95436'
'.ear J. 2e
estab/is/ ea' by
intersection.

N89°37'D/' E
Ed. nothing N IV Con Gof'Y.
'Lot I. Point es-tab/IShed by
proportion.
dG�
C.E. %6 Car. Sec. 28
/llething found or.S'et.

Established by
i propo tfd/•
S21'S
/9 A
57 s.w Car Sec. 22'
Fd. U.S.G. L. O. Brass
Cap in 3",:p. down r'

0.6' '
N89'51'22"E /29.70'"
(Rec. S89.54'IV/28.70t
gay. Township
Plat , 5/15/ lf)
its
S22
2!I 27 Tract No. /0055 w
NN/ Cor. Sec.27 s a
M.� 9i/4/-44
,k,,' Fa'. (i S G.L.O. 8ra.ts ≤ Rancho Pal/Hera* Estates `' Cap flush in (Rec. N69. 45'51"E per MB) 96/4/ -16) Unit No. 4 M.8. 40/36 I ,, pavement (Rec. Si 89.54'1Y .2639.34' I per ..evern ant Township Nat dated Ma M. /914) io ' 'r) 1 I I I I a I 2
rn :,a I /3 I /7I /4 I /S /4I /3 I /.2 N II I la., k
NI
ADDITIONAL Lori's"
DEDICATION -LOT "E"
LOTS 9 -29
SEE SHEET 4
53 SEE SHEET 7
N H! ,/4 Se . Z7
55 SEE SHEET 8
N89.45'/7'E 2436.82'
/9.38.75'
-1 ',fd. rip. down 05'
a U, S. G. L . O. Brass Cap
loose in hole tied too
'VA ca - /n 1%¢ '1;o
L.
w
ti Accepted for
,3.M Cor. Sec. 28 Pd.,
NJ: /!f l.p. iVit6 8 P
Plug (N. l -a9,) -� Mar S9 '52"14,
�(Rec.2683.SG'
per 6ov'f Plat)
- 2683./9'
H
h
4 5322.83' (Rec. 5323.5i° per 6or't. Net dated 5/64//4)., West
.S4Ca:Sse.28 ,.s.& COP. Gov't. Lot /2 Nothrn9 Found orSet. Point ' l tneainq Rutlaior et, ' established b Sin le Pro rtion. ' ,fame C tab/i ?by prgo_' _'_ 263964' (Rec . 2640 00 per Govt Plat).- t ) i •
X143/9.82'(Rec. /320.001..1
�-- 1319.82' (Rec. /320.00') ----Z+
•
Ss
326 1327
333
QN
NQ
O°°11
qv
,t1)43
Cor. Sec. 27 Pd. /df" /:p. with U.s.G.L.O.

Bross Cap up /.0' in RocIC Mound
12 401000, _
a part of Subd 4'isron--
/j (Rae • N89.58'W 2635.38' per Gov't. Township Plat dated 5/14//4 N89°52'4/7 2632.22'
1q.
cP
•
• /
., -
60 -' r
See Thee t No. 4
for Monurnents a lon '
West Eldorado Drive
y SEPTEMBER 1979
.4t .N. Car. rec. 27 fel. /"l.p. wit, plasfrc ph" inaMed • 'Rrr Co. Storm, R A ATP down ! S°
• r
1 i>
i
11 380
3; 7t
Tract 2/72.
4a• 45//9-20
I i I I I I I
. I 2. 13 I 4 I 's' I e.• 17 I 8
/388.11 48
LOT "C"
LOTS 1 3O — 47
229
Na
SERYL
N_
,
698.07'
Fd. 3/"io. vp
(No Reference)
Aceepfad as cerrfer of
Sec. 27, 7:55., R.
a
Rec. 578 EL DORADO � . , .P':3
wj5T I ::3J 1:� s; 33��... 1

1.;30 I 1
1 ` Cd. 3/�"/p. R.C.E. 862 down
O.2'and bent 0.39'South /0.6/'
West of R/N/ B.C. per *.B. 38160.64
LANE
2640.24'
ao•o.'>z"E
N
N
SINUS
. 8 39/9-5
Tracts ,2/53
M. a a 43//S -/I '.11 I _
�.�u`41 7.446::*
5 9' --
250.AD'
f ,Maas.)
t
uf
N 18°'z' .
74 11
—1'•••Tra c l'
13ea r, dart'
SHEET 3 OF 8 SHEETS k
S ^a
5 y
S. e
cp,a E. Cor. Set .22 Ft Us.e.1 W ��
"-� down /.7'per��s a 1
N-
522 S IlAt 144
d
--_!-- c
14 ;Z1
^~et
N
Ed. 3/4"r:p R C.f 86,2 down 0.2'. Point
% on No. RIP West Eldorado Drive pet,%
'°+ M.B.38/60-64---- --
Eldorado Golf Clvb
Estates Unit No. 6
NB. 38/60-64

BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE WEST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
SECTION 28, T. 5 S., R.6.E., S.B.M., BEARING
N. 00°57'45" W. PER DEEP CANYON RANCH PROPERTIES
UNIT NO. 3, M.B. 33/97-98, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

MAP NOTES AND LEGEND
INDICATES MONUMENT POUND AS NOTED.

INDICATES SET 1 1/4" I.P. TAGGED R.C.E
8720, FLUSH PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD "A".

SET NAIL AND BRASS TAG STAMPED "R.C.E. 8720" IN CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (WITHIN LOTS "B" AND "C" ONLY) ALONG THE PROLONGATIONS OF THE SIDE LOT LINES OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 47, IN LIEU OF FRONT LOT CORNERS BEING SET. SET 3/4" X 18"
IRON PIPE TAGGED "R.C.E. 8720" AT ALL OTHER LOT CORNERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.

G.L.

O.R.

S.D.E.

P.U.E.

INDICATES

INDICATES
SET SPIKE & FLASH FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT.

SET 3/4" I.P. TAGGED R.C.E. 8720.

GOVERNMENT LOT.

OFFICIAL RECORDS.

STORM DRAIN EASEMENT.

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT.

I.M.E INDICATES IRRIGATION MAIN EASEMENT.

W.L.E. INDICATES WATER LINE EASEMENT

BUILDING SETBACK LINES SHALL CONFORM TO THE
EXISTING ZONING.

TRACT CONTAINS 244.17 ACRES±,MEASURED
TO CENTERLINE GOOK ST. & FAIRWAY
DRIVE.

TRACT CONTAINS LOTS 1 THROUGH 60 AND
LOTS "A" THROUGH "G".
of
of
N-$ 4 Cor. Sec. 27 Fd.

U.S.G.L•O. Brass Cap up 0.8'
�' in Rock Mound.
iL.

BOUNDARY �

INDEX MAP
5c.41.5.° /'1=300`
N
p15 /12/9

CoP�S
'0
Ai L M DE
Z.96'
IAN
stio
gel
V
e5
'09" 2
aq
d�o� ° '%Y N '/ O'/ W
ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE EAST ONE
-HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 6 EAST SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND r I' .� 12 - NO•/2'09

IN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
TRACT N0. 14968-I
'Not a Part
49 SHEET 4 OF 8 SHEETS
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 2 2, THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTHWEST - /s'IVL•E.

PORTIONS OF LOTS 224-2 27, ELDORADO GOLF CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 6, M.B. 38/60 64, RECORDS OF F IVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 4:6.54•/3•° 1.243 d=8.38'46•• 589°5ice"4... _ JONES - TILLSON & ASSOCIATES W ! 45, SEPTEMBER 1979 .. ?o.00�`��--��-�6s Lod ..8 3
fA/rT �, 3- '- ��' \ AS' � TA -Ac ? ,vo. /OO55 , M. e. 94/4/-546 .W�
•„� . 0 L s3/ 4r2' • e I!► o @ s� �� NI IN !N r' ... .:? 5/6 RAVA S Powell co. Fb e I = 41 20 00'
uO •
�'O \I j �PoLES /zee. /Z/i6/JZ, I
)11 ' lav„R 20' ,�.
jj'
/ � to
%`A �, casje�,ys� W0.{er j
der t®rr/• 0
Stor �''�"v1lley , ,t rG�(9)�;
. oaGh`l l4 R� ` 5.� 4 �pu ;
Gisfr�ep.R•i8' /
/25.00'
L'S.57. 6 /'
LOT "
�i
'pJ Tv. 449° 05 35 ��
RSS0.OD', `o�t'o Lg60.30 t
L=46.36%`` \t'
3500, `
414
...r -Lc
/, 4.76,2 77'x..
tD
49 L= 30558•
Deta1t '4"
(Not to Scale)
4 M B. 4035
C+1
a, 6996/'--
iqf NO°/2'09"2✓
' 5, 86'—
N85°08'29'°E 4.59,08.1
263.69
26 •"==8-w(R)
EEMT. *A "s EASEMENT FOre w4T�e PIvQ O5E5 451..E
AEG. 9/18/74, ra 1 N5T NO. /20 760 O/s T� T �R�5 ti.
�
Az 246 38 s/2 "===
/P'/75' £=e/.3(°'\
ESN1T "0"; EASEMt,V7 2PESE/e✓ED d Y 7�/E country-
0,- (x)sa4•34'4a "E\
cr
t'/YE/P5'/DE FOR PUBL/e 4./T/L/T/aos
REe. 7/z5/44, /;,;7 iV0 7405,
((' 3ed¢. .,1cBE
Z.X op •
ys� �`
3j..
ti
0 ,hto'AME:e' 6-A/6Y
AccoSS, P.UE. £ W.L q

0./Z2 A4�
.2. 7.39:
4'
VN
SS
144
ng /mho

Gopi
1,2/
-
(R
omma
Lki
C)
Scale:1=/00'
Lki
z
Rancho Pa l/neras Estates
Unit No. 4
M.B. 40/35
I t I
I
I
North L inle 5ec. 2]- '
N89° 47'5/"£
9/700 '
"01 Ex/st/ng R/6V
699(0P
' ¢ Easement to
Southern Sierras -
;Pawtr Co. for po/eSe_M85`08'29"E 459.08'
.Rec./2//b/32 '
O.R. 97/174
-20�Emergeney, Access,
•
' 4=28.54'5/"
/GAO/'
ti R= 325'
r• •

SEE SHEET
NO. 8
s
.72/./5-00 ,' a_ ►�•

22. DO' i»"tat
(10N84°3G 8•w
(R)s8¢•3648 E

25.00 •
r Dr-
\ i (14 \'
: /h:28
O''
yEPlTag/l7, , rd. 34- r. p. R.C. E. 862,
E,eGtY 1$l /i� ,e /5� '3SN (be/71 1 down O2') O39'So.
©. g�� d ' a.49 E O.6/'!N. of R/111 B.C.
2 ' • � Pd. /'"1:p. R.C.E. 862 flush at", ,
Je �,eGEL \' i ‘^'-
(127 8 )1
5o�'12r °
0'163
ZZ3.9
r S'84°36'48Ee,R)
`".25.00'
s
7 7
z<
z N
i oo't-vioE
ESk1T. T'3, G,L /F..EL EC re''&
/40PVEie co. Fo,e /4=2o4ES
/2//O/S"?/ /A/s7. No. /44997
\ /
"/VOT A PART
° ,fAAIRWAY
'N89�
2/7.39'
a.NO°/286°'09"w 48 _
♦5.

S('vo o0$
s th; 000 co q
/95.39'
27 A

IN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
TRACT 14968-1
NO.

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 22, IONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH I PORTIONS OF LOTS 224-227, ELDORADO GOLF CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 6, M.B. 38/60-64, IJONES -.TILLSON a ASSOCIATES RANCHO NyCorSe27Pd.//.P. MANZ PARADISE ALAIER W/p/os,', plug mor.�c d I r:5 ;: i,:

V
ALLEY • I DRIVE l d ,4/4P ROAD
(LOTI F) 11:::;`1C171 .r
(wJ / p
— 2642.26 N .sec.z� - - 'n'��
189.47 5/"E

65.00'
305.89'
N.89°475/"E.

G: 9'//'/4" 305.90' _

4.16,4:iv 59'57"N=2254 .77

81.7/'

4:/(r°59' �7. .4'237.35' _ �--
Af/e59'S7~"is 2 9.93'An"'
.- »4 9 /4'28";"
L. /2'4.00' .k)
"z
� �1 2tv�9) �4 B.C. per M..B.38/60-64--__-
z zz.s4•"
\Tract
Boundary - o
LOT 60 h

0.382 AC.t $.
•
jT____,,,-,.; _
\
5 Ric . ; Data
per\M.8.38/60-64
.P82°'N/4'
A -7280'N
r:244.55'
L= 402.43') N
fd.34"/P• a84So. F ,W
005E(befit fdown 0.2)
N.

Boundary,;
---Fd. 3/4"1:p. hem'
don/// O.,Z' (Cater
Ma ter
O
ob/i't
line

BERYL LANE
(LOT 'C -''Per M.838/
Fa'. •3/,,l " l: p. R C E 862
of B.C.
'ANGLE PO/NT /388.13' Nd9104'a¢'E M
366.87'

74.8/' 48.93•
366.g7'
LOT e"
123.34'
-'. /0'Easeenent for Waterline and access I
to Eldorado Country Club Water Co., igec.6/3D/6/,
Instr. No. 56190 f Coachella Palley County Water
Or:strict, Rec. 4/4/64, Instr. No.42//5 I
xte//ds to\ airway Drive) .
i..`...t
52 22.198AC. ±

THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTHWEST
RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND
RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. I
N 89°44'24"E
4:08°40'45"
T =/5/.77'
11,08°40'45" °Q zoz5
/8.37'4=2•.59'39•
Trac
/
fed (flat -MAN
cailt/wet/On) N.
,-Fd.34"ip. R.C.E.
862 at B.C.

N85°58'39"E (R)
/
� w
64)/dentl'cal Points_- 'Tract`
N ark
(Pd. 3/4" up 10' (No Refere/124k _ - T,s
,'Accepted as center of See. 27,
✓ 7 5 S., R 6 E . , ‘7.B.41. 5outh Line; 3s93
lot ?2.f
(Rec. i ¢ Data per
M. a. 8/40'44
a=s0/;
�R:3oo
l T= /40.85',
.„6-
°2 3.39
/24.00'
J
I SEPTEMBER 1979 Wltt/AMS
I I
Nor/h Line Sec 27,
( Rec. N89°5/'OO E Are Te No 2056) i . ` I
(M8 39/95-9G) `/ •254769
Rer 2069.2 to N.E. k ®j //' "" `
COR 34C 27 --o.R. 2594 55 WTI V
/06485'
/ S. 0°i5'3G "'E. 45/0'
' (Rec. S 0.09'E 45./')
4'299.17' /40.04'
R: 2000' x/85°41'3.! /40.04.' 2=//•56'4
/40.04'
._4=302.96'--
L:11..:01.6:775;60:.
20/9 ;31.94

0. � 4/ tlil
Nil
`�° 80°00,59..8
N 89' .-
g0.32'
18•I Z' 38"
Ear i-®
Yi/Argie BEY Stir
GQA�E D/57go 18/' 9
g'g . 40/5Z'
7Ag L 10)
( �E 1715 8/0
e�e(
N78°12'381
78°12� 8 _(Rec.N ler?'� pet M.8• ate

80.9 RADA 64) (Prey
M•B'38/60' 1
k► P 1 1
11 .... .. .. \
1 1
1 totes
do Golf Club ES
Eldorado
No. 6 M.8. .38160-64
--Pd. 3/4' ., (No 449)
per M.B. 38/60-64, al' deep.
9 13; v1aG. fro
Z 2 os�6Q
-Fd 34-1: p IP. C. E 862
per MB 38/40-64,01' deep.

IOh4 a '49'E,
,1 //.

SHEET 5 OF 8 SHEETS
40,41'N
tk
ROAD S.E. Cor Sec. 22 Pd.
[LSCLD. Brass Cap down 17"
„4,61.44.24,,E/20. 04, per M.B. 39/95-96
Rs /S00'n r. /Sd.9S' L 3/2.76'
J tJ8'3/'25 "A'=N75'N L=2/9.43 (4W65056'2

11. 04'16' OP'
L= /p9.85'
/O/. / 7'
,.6 N89°50'/4'$'
•
a=04 /5'24-
L= /09.68'
A = 0°45/06'
R= /525'
4= 20.00'
4 = 2°27'24"
R= /525'
L=65.39'
4274 20

38..E 2
,
---;;-
°1Z1 862 down orado
Fd Point
I.P. No. E.

West E4
pornt ° e Nor . 36160-64 Drive P
© d=22.2/'00"
¢.` R: 50' J Re c . § meas.

L=/950'
P18 / //

IN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
TRACT N0. 14968

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 22, THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTHWEST
ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION k a 28, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 224-227, ELDORADO GOLF
CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 6, M.B. 38/60-64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

JONES-TILLSON a ASSOCIATES
'366.33'
.SEPTEMBER 1979
N QN-v
tA
\qt\l'0
v`?ks
��
P.4 L Nf OESE'iE'T
In
--
/NO/A N INEL.L5
N
co
�• L. ;,
M
5 4.
<. z".mss
v`•?9-
Sec_ 28
NoT/?7A/4 PO. o, SET
,
ek= c. 5d9•591.05 -"g ,aire D66rP'4NYo•V R.4.VCNI=iE'ofur.e77's OM'F Ne. Z, m.o. Z9/83-8¢, N89'$9'3 -4"E Za 4-Z.96'
1 -A -&-e.. Al 89" s ' �O"E PE,e 7;er N®. Z/8 M.B. ¢ f-6 _ C/T Y
N.. w 4,e
4'1& 4O71
FO. NoThi/A1�,.
:03.48'se•�a
',lg. /0'
S8b°03' 4I $'
//4.75"
ifh
N8
/93 5
385°
54 42' 39"W
/6 O.
•0 0►
6 6°
9°
S9.

C/
F9 ..

47. ,�,"w (2)
�/4.20�2 50/O®
of. L. 1
0 s
b.
•
°
A/D,e74/ G /A/6 --
Z
L /M/T5
L /Nt/TS
57 16.09/Ac.±
• 4Z. IN
88°/8'33"/Y

57.00'
3 (R)388°!8'33.w
r
tql
O
•
(
N
•
d x 9/'44'ZO" -
\� G=- Z.G`4'
W
416 C:71% Tis.

A
•b
M
44'
SHEET 6 OF 8 SHEETS
,s.ivror. (rec. 22. Pd. U.S. G.L.O.

Brass Cap 47 3.'4p. down O.6'
'50'1
s
zk
064x' Nti
f
[ ° 3/. 4z
% \I
ti f �s ,vy
335 �. �
n'
L1�
SEE SHEET A/0. 7

04. , W Cor. 80.
e- x,27 rd. U.S.G.L.D.

Brass Cap flush
- - - - - /n pavement
K
W k)
U1
.um
k.9
ku -4
11 VI 101
C��
19 .•r W u
44 .\
lV I
W
to
•
SCALE: /wx/OD..

MS//2/12

GAP`k
If
Scale : /'�= /00
Ra �1S
,31r W�.s•50515I
S15
I/fr.`�3
'5
o•
w
.15
IN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS SHEET 7 OF 8 SHEETS
TRACT NO 14968--I

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SE ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP PORTIONS OF LOTS 224-227, ELDORADO GOLF CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 6, M.B.

JONES-TILLSON B ASSOCIATES
2 4
9 514E
b'
06'
~
\ ails 14'9.

D'.5" I..
9 54

17.599 Ac.
oai-E
-or r vole
6•y GAS Go, 6!' /'�', ,----
\ p�'�e4,lj /
Rte/ /

9. 43' 7,9
�
B3 69
Z29.69.. 7
I
Z
Arr
deg TNo.��5 �8
Wall!,�U°' ri�S�
g°.
7/
Yo L- 4G
6,90/4
N°'
46 I
5 ") I
�o� �- 8u bti: �1 y
z
s.
,0
0 ..f, i„-1h
Da..3 � 5
b
3 c.

I -
a
15T 1'
N
0 w
w4 to
w
CTION 22, THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND TIE SOUTHWEST
5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND
38/60-64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ,oINJ % SEPTEMBER 1979
r Zci.I 3
��Ey51�10�a 7Z
3 of � PST
3o'EA5EMENT POSE! /4OADS ¢`
uT/G / T/E5 r0 EL ao,2q.o
C O!/N TAY Ch.C/8 $4447E,42
,EEC. d/,3O/i/, /A/57 NO. 06490
A"�
2,55.89'
- -Qa -7•ewoo
RA 2425'
3pp.SD' 7.11�
,- Easement to Cal r'fornia
Electric Power Co. for
poles, Rec. 5///l5/,

0.R. /270/335 /2. 145 Ac.
-�/
=‘,: 909 -:::-.-------
gel • yr°
(�� l-� ,g/GT //b��93 .ISM
#f° 040 p/5 a� 0I5
7 � GvG3iEl�3g2
�EA��
CP
4:
toe
ol'39
,Ip. IZ 3
314
S
(
j_
S3 s1 7
SEE SHEET NO. 8

0..

R= /i00'
R'/575'
SEE SATE T NO. 4
e. L' 442.18'
t�448.07
�i .' `
/ // (0It
/
Mg //2 /

1 I

IN THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
SEE SHEET NO. 4
TRACT NO: 14968--1
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 22 THE NORTH ONE-HALF AND THE SOUTHWEST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 27 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 224-227, ELDORADO GOLF CLUB ESTATES UNIT NO. 6, M. B. 38/60-64, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

JONES-TILLSON a ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 1979
1 Scale
:/••=2.00*

2.g
Cor Sec• ,
c,E.!n6Fd.orSat;;H___j ,,,
(Mint
� a31'O t 334.36`--- �•,
N8� S h. Sec. Z8 'v
No. kine
28134D
A
t9
1 1
•
N7329.69'- -
796/9403„4.,
-/46.p0•
1q1'
•
2032.76' to S.W
Cor. Gov't Lot /2
SEE SHEET NO. 7.i
OA
5C,q•*68'
-- N78 6fY
9'
a
rn
O
I
N 69° 31 Ot E 01'
106b'
466°03'05...
`364
1354.35:

S 88*448.11' W
m
O / n
%'o/� \__
a
,
% ria titer Jpol-y `t'
h LRe6/ r� il0 5•trt . 0.R
/ y�0_di pit°33
A, PaIe33187'O
.0.t5 8 ,
/ 3031
t
l'E
oleo "-go.
ilo
.-- l t® Cali for n (cs,
EascmanPower CO. �o/ 3P35
�Rec. 511151, 0.R. !Z
Rc- 5�
•
3h3� n� 4.°
'E se(f)ht° 3
011�q� o
(ply 1w
I -
.�4
ti
040
aI
down o Ire fa.O1 S' tG
Brass Reset
caP in 14 P'
o �•P. Res
Co 00
525.27;48'4
-"46. 52 '
S19.34'23"741

95.52.'
a.
1 N 78° / 7 %5"iy,
N89° 4511'1„
LOT e16" "."'- ° .

35.59.. o,••,;* z .
(4 5'58Z/s o \
' 64/4418'
V\\ \ r:t7r ,-!s'.
�ra�o O�k 01
/ ,p --
,s ,
\ ,
• o N
�� `uw,-� Ills IA13fl11',
iit .;
atio ,� e/ m H ' o P'�;t� q4o,:
eq �' -, c 1 It
i ono Z
/ hvlA.�FJ~ $ , •.
�� N O li tit A•�
3 v �
�I °` 3 0^�,_
^�� o1llw , �41
i-1
rl I
N'
(4:7•4/4'06"
�tR= 06.00'
\.T'ZL. S .0g; E'(
DETA/L 'A"
55 /03.2 97Ac.
y636. 82'
1938,75`
Line S I seC. Z�
L
'No in
.837.4.4'
BDCY/V 7A,e y
ti
3 417S
s
S' t•tS' . t'
"?,,,1;111.s
t.
3a�1E
0 • "--(R)S84°36'48"E
;LI=29.36'/9•.
<R•/75'
/=90.42'
raNST°
moo.
(R)SB7°06,'24 "S
4 = 32°05'53-
" R = 200'
L=//2.05'
151
SHEET 8 OF 8 SHEETS
•3')
y4)o 0
o o11
pt
.441 belit3b

4.1 3„ezer•
V•.
ri 011-C% ,, 91?
y
DETAIL
tr
X60
i9 'jam.

B// �.
tat
�$
�s
I"= 40'
4:23•52'N
,'%4•,22§'
L.93.72'
• .13:341V5'39"
L�/0444'
o,
•
.43'
"698.0
„P 1.0
/No R , VI for Otte'
AcCePI7
See-
-_S 491'3276—E

89.38'
- SO/°28'08''W
//7.04'
•

1 Angelica Avila
From:

Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11:11 AM
To:City Clerk
Subject:Planning Commission Safer Streets Recommendations CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments.

Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my support for the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding Safer Streets, specifically adding crosswalks at Fairway and Eldorado on both sides of the street (from the park across Fairway and from the park across Eldorado).

I believe all of the Planning Commission’s recommendations align with the best interests of our community and they will result in preserving the beauty of our city yet reduce potential safety issues while saving millions of dollars.

I am confident that these recommendations will contribute positively to our city's development and growth. I encourage the City Council to approve the Planning Commission's recommendations.

Sincerely,
Michelle Mauler

1 Angelica Avila
From:Brenda Campbell <
Sent:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11:14 AM
To:City Clerk
Subject:Safe Streets
CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments. ________________________________
Dear Mayor and Council members,
From David and Brenda Campbell.

We are unable to attend today's meeting. We wanted to let you know we were happy with the recommendations the planning committee made to you regarding "Safe Streets". The 2 crosswalks at Fairway and El Dorado and Fairway and Cook are suAicient along with a DG walking path on the south side of Fairway. We hope you will follow their recommendations. With increased speed enforcement and the items they recommended on Cook, El Dorado and Rancho Palmeras we can help control speeding and add safety without sacriﬁcing the beauty of our neighborhood.

Kindly,
David and Brenda Campbell

Page 1 ends

To: Indian Wells City Council and Staff
From: Martin Lax
Re: Issues re: Safer Streets Proposal
I want you, and us, the residents of IW, to make decisions with all information available.

I want you to protect those of us, whom are most impacted by decisions.

I want you to also promote trust with our government; that is with our employed staff and our representatives.

This process has wasted a lot of my time, as well as my neighbors. It has caused great stress, worry and concern. I, share those feelings, and add my frustration, particularly with regard to you and us being fully informed.
● I ask that standards be developed for Staff memoranda be more forthcoming; presenting the positive and the negative, and be complete and thorough.

PC Stop Warrant Report: The Stop Sign Survey Report was not provided to the Planning Commission.

Despite my FOIA request for any drafts or Final Stop Sign Survey Report, as well as communications, NO documents supplied. It has traffic counts and other data. WHY? Let me also comment that I and others do not believe it is good to have extreme traffic enforcement. Tourists should be mindful of their speeds, but they will harbor negative feelings and not return and spend money at our hotels, our golf course and our restaurants if they get tickets for inconsequential offenses. A traffic ticket offence is not criminal; and we feel increased Sheriff presence patrolling our neighborhood will - increase overall safety,
- deter speeding
- and address so called "unsafe vehicular activities in residential areas." PC Vintage: Vintage County Club letter presented at the last meeting before this Council was not provided to the Planning Commission. This Council wanted Eldorado and Vintage positions to be considered and it was not.

Overall, I want to commend the Planning Commission for their work at the May 29, 2025 Hearing.

Fiscal Impact: Over this process, the $7.5 million Capital Budget was not emphasized, nor the $3.5M grants secured or additional $9.6M being sought. Several residents asked about money, but we were told calculations were premature. This frustrated the process of not appreciating the scope of work that could be performed.

Eldorado Drive & Other Items
I am confused about the Staff Report about striping Eldorado to accommodate one lane of traffic in each direction and provide a combination bicycle/golf cart lane in each direction (marked in white paint only). We do not have an exemplar/drawing, nor specifications.

I know my neighbors backing up to Eldorado have concerns about safety and I am supportive of relocating the curbs into existing number 2 travel lanes to increase the landscape buffer on each side from Fairway to Osage. I have some concerns regarding right and left turns at the Osage/Eldorado intersection. ● I and others would like Eldorado lowered, considering the elevation differences between East and West of Eldorado, as well as the substantial budget and grant funds Eastboand HWY 111 Cook No Right Turn
A "No U-Turn" Sign southbound on Cook" should be sufficient. A "No Right Turn on Red" eastbound from Highway 111 to southbound Cook Street is not a good thing as residents and others will be hampered from going home or into the shopping center.

City Council Meeting:

June 10, 2025 - Public Comment
Provided at the Dais
General Business Item I.1

JUNE 4, 2025

INDIAN WELLS SAFER STREETS
COOK STREET OPTION 2: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS

EXISTING MEDIAN
8’ BIKE & GOLF CART LANE
8’ BUFFER
10’ DRIVE LANE
8’ BIKE & GOLF CART LANE
2’ BUFFER
10’ DRIVE LANE

PROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED CURB
8’ SIDEWALK
A T TAC HMEN T #1

Page 370 of 409 ends

ATTACHMENT #2

Page 371 of 409 ends

ATTACHMENT #3

Page 372 of 409 ends

RANCHO PALMERAS DRIVE OPTION 1: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS JUNE 4, 2025

INDIAN WELLS SAFER STREETS
8’ BIKE & GOLF CART LANE
10’ DRIVE LANE
9’ BIKE & GOLF CART LANE
9’ BUFFER
11’ DRIVE LANE

CENTER TURN LANE

EXISTING MEDIAN
8’ BIKE & GOLF CART LANE
4 ’ BUFFER
10’ DRIVE LANE
8’ BIKE & GOLF CART LANE
3’ BUFFER
11’ DRIVE LANE

EXISTING CURB

PROPOSED CURB

EXISTING CURBEXISTING CURB
10’ LEFT TURN LANE PROPOSED MEDIAN
6’ BUFFER
A T TAC HMEN T #4

Page 373 of 409 ends

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025
To: City Council
From: City Manager Department
Prepared by: Kristen Nelson, Administrative Services Manager Subject: Ordinance Adopting the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map Published by the Office of the State Fire Marshall in
Compliance with California Fire Code and Government Code Section 51179
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council INTRODUCES Ordinance designating Moderate, High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) in the Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) as recommended by the Office of the State Fire Marshal, in accordance with the California Fire Code and Government Code section 51179; and
FINDS the project not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15060, 15061(b)(3), and 15378.

BACKGROUND:

On March 24, 2025, the Office of the State Fire Marshal published new maps identifying Fire Hazard Severity Zones within Local Responsibility Areas (LRA). The updated zones will be applied statewide across all jurisdictions. The City of Indian Wells is required by state law (Government Code section 51179) to adopt the maps within 120 days of their release. This Ordinance would adopt the maps as recommended and does not increase the severity zone of any given area within our jurisdiction.

After the devastating Oakland Hills Fire in 1991, Assembly Bill 337 required the Office of the State Fire Marshal to evaluate fire hazard severity in Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs) and make recommendations to local jurisdictions where Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZs) exist. In 2021, the law was amended to include both Moderate and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs) are areas such as incorporated cities, urban regions, agricultural lands, and portions of the desert where the local government is responsible for wildfire protection. This responsibility is typically handled by city fire departments, fire protection districts, counties, or by CAL FIRE under contract.

Page 374 of 409 ends

According to the State Fire Marshal, the factors considered in determining fire hazard within wildland areas include fire history, flame length, terrain, local weather, and potential fuel over a 50-year period. Outside of wildlands, the model also accounts for factors that may threaten buildings, including terrain, weather, urban vegetation cover, blowing embers, proximity to wildlands, fire history, and fire hazards in nearby wildlands.

The State Fire Marshal’s office uses an extension of the State Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone model as the basis for evaluating fire hazards in Local Responsibility Areas. The LRA hazard rating reflects the risks of flame and ember intrusion from adjacent wildlands, as well as flammable vegetation within urban areas.

Government code section 51179 requires a local agency to designate moderate, high and very high fire hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal. Indian Wells is looking to adopt the maps as recommended and is not looking to increase the severity zone of any given area within our jurisdiction.

What Does This Mean for Indian Wells
Impact on the community varies depending on the severity zone identified.

At the April 3, 2025, City Council Meeting, Deputy Fire Marshall Kohl Hetrick presented information about the Map specific to the City of Indian Wells (the Local Responsibility Area) which includes Moderate and High classifications, but no Very High classifications (ATTACHMENT 1). In his presentation, he noted that the only impact to residents would be those in High classifications where residents will need to provide hazard disclosure during real estate transactions.

On April 14, 2025, in compliance with state law, an eBlast was sent to residents informing them of today’s discussion, inviting public comment, and providing information on what the Maps are, how the classifications are determined, and who to contact with questions (ATTACHMENT 2). The eBlast also encourages residents to contact Chief Beverlin to schedule a free home hardening assessment.

How Do These Classifications Impact Insurance
The Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps will not directly determine a resident’s ability to get or keep home insurance, but they may play a role. Insurance companies use their own risk models, which look at a home’s vulnerability to fire and other short-term factors.

While they may not specifically rely on CAL FIRE’s maps, they do use some of the same wildfire risk data. However, insurance companies also consider additional, frequently changing factors that aren’t included in CAL FIRE’s long-term hazard mapping. Residents should check with their providers to understand how wildfire risk affects their specific policy. The California Department of Insurance put out a Consumer Alert outlining why

Page 375 of 409 ends

CAL FIRE hazard maps do not affect insurance rates or availability (ATTACHMENT 3) as well as a review of Frequently Asked Questions (ATTACHMENT 4).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact on the City to adopt the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map through Ordinance.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The adoption of the ordinance designating Moderate, High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Areas as recommended by the Office of the State Fire Marshal is exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15060, 15061(b)(3), and 15378) ATTACHMENTS:

1.City of Indian Wells FHSZ Map

2.April 14, 2025, eBlast Informing Residents

3.Consumer Alert

4.Frequently Asked Questions

5.Ordinance

6.Submitted Public Comments

Page 376 of 409 ends

Community Development Department
Adoption of Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ)
Map
City Council Meeting:

June 10, 2025 - Presentation
General Business Item I.2

Identifies potential wildfire behavior — not current threat Aligns with state requirements
Supports long-term fire resilience for the community
NO VHFHSZ’s in Indian Wells
State-mandated adoption under CA. Government Code § 51179. Developed by CAL FIRE’s Office of the State Fire Marshall Overview & Purpose

What the Map Represents…
Models hazard, not risk — like a
flood map
Represents the likely path of
ember spread under aggressive
fire conditions
Data Driven Software Models
Considerations: Topography,
prevailing wind direction,
vegetation, airborne ember
travel

Where the flow will naturally go….

Community Standards Provide Inherent Resilience
Class A Roofs
Non-Combustible Finishes
Limited Exposed
Combustibles
Non-Ventilated Roofs
No Rain Gutters
Dual Pane/Tempered
Windows and Doors
No Combustible Fencing

Fire-Resistant Landscaping
Desert-adapted, irrigated,
and HOA-maintained
vegetation
Annual palm trimming
Required removal of dead
and dried vegetation
Low-flammability and fire –
resistant landscaping: agave,
palo verde, yucca, etc.

Using the Interactive GIS Map:

How does this Impact Property Owners:

Available Resources:

Recommended Action:

Council INTRODUCES an Ordinance designating Moderate, High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) as required by CA Government Code section 51179; and
FINDS the project not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15060, 15061(b)(3), and 15378; and

QUESTIONS?

City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1)
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources:

Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of CaliforniaThe State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. and other relevant factors including areas where winds
have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.
statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire
Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Waterbody
Federal Responsibility
Area (FRA)Unzoned LRA
Incorporated City
Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers
Scale: 1:36,000 at 11" x 17"
0 1 2Km
0 1Mi
High Moderate
High Moderate
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal
Indian Wells
111

UNINCORPORATED
RIVERSIDE CO.

LA QUINTA

PALM DESERT

PALM DESERT PALM DESERT
March 24, 2025
As Identified by the
State Fire MarshalLocal Responsibility Area
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
CITY OF INDIAN WELLS – RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility
Area (SRA), Effective April 1, 2024
ATTACHMENT #1

Page 377 of 409 ends

Micaela Wilkey
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

City of lndian Wells
Monday, April 14,20257:18 AM
Micaela Wilkey
We want your feedback on the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map! CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments.

INDIAN .1.WI,LLS
Cr\tl l0l{N
'.'\
Hello Micaela,
The City of lndian Wells is seeking your feedback on the CAL FIRE, Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) Map.

The FHSZ maps are developed using a science-based, field-tested model that assigns ahazard score based on factors influencing the likelihood and behavior of wildfires. These maps were recently updated to more accurately represent the zones in California that are susceptible to wildfires.

It's important to note that the FHSZ map is based on hazard, not risk, meaning the map identifies areas where wildfires are more likely to spread aggressively based on physical conditions such as slope, wind patterns, vegetation and fire history. lt helps planners and safety officials understand how a wildfire could behave in a pafticular area under extreme conditions.

ATTACHMENT #2

Page 378 of 409 ends

This map is a long-term planning tool, not a realtime risk assessment, evacuation notice or emergency alert. lt is meant to inform building codes and fire safety policies that contribute to making our community more resilient over time.

What does this mean for residents?
lf your properly is located in the "high" or "very high" zones of the FHSZ map, you must provide ahazard disclosure during real estate transactions.

Additionally, the City would like your feedback regarding the updated map.

To submit a public comment, please email [email protected] or attend the public hearing on Thursday, May 16,2025, regularly scheduled Council Meeting to provide your feedback in person.

The FHSZs won't directly determine your ability to get or keep home insurance, but they may play a role. lnsurance companies use their own risk models, which look at a home's vulnerability to fire and other short- term factors. While they may not specifically rely on CAL FIRE's maps, they do use some of the same wildfire risk data. However, insurance companies also consider additional, frequently changing factors that aren't included in CAL FIRE's longterm hazard mapping. lf you're concerned about insurance coverage, check with your provider to understand how wildfire risk affects your policy.

Residents can request free home hardening assessments to identify how prepared their property is for a wildfire. To schedule an assessment please contact Chief Beverlin at (760) 902-6972 or
M ike. Beverlin@fire. ca.qov.

Additional Resources. History of FHSZ Maos. What are FHSZs?. Frequently Asked Questions. lf you have any questions, please contact the Office of the State Fire Marshal at (91 6) 633-7655 or [email protected].

View the FHSZ Map
City of Indian Wells
44-950 Eldorado Drive
lndian Wells, C492210
(760) 346-2489
Monday - Friday
B:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
(Closed 12:00 - 1:00 p.m.)
Closed major holidays
Stay Connected
fx@
City of Indian Wells | 44-950 Eldorado Drive I indian Wells, CA 92210 US 2 Page 379 of 409

Unsubscribe I Update Profile I Constant Contact Data Notice Zt Constont\9 Contoct
Try emoil morketing for free todoy!
3 Page 380 of 409

insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357
CAL FIRE hazard maps do not affect insurance rates or availability Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued a fact
sheet explaining that CAL FIRE hazard maps do not
affect insurance rates or availability. A Spanish-
language fact sheet is also available.

For many years, insurance companies have been
using wildfire risk models for determining where they
will write and renew policies, and how much premium
to charge a policyholder -- not the Fire Hazard
Severity Zone maps. CAL FIRE’s maps are required
by law and their purpose is to drive local planning
decisions, not insurance decisions.

Commissioner’s POV: “Let me be clear: The CAL
FIRE hazard maps are not used for insurance rates
or underwriting decisions. But they will empower
communities with more accurate information about
the very real hazards we face. The reality is we all
need to do more to protect our homes and communities from wildfires. When communities know and understand their risks, they can plan and prepare.”
Background: The Department of Insurance is implementing a Sustainable Insurance Strategy aimed at supporting safer communities. Based on feedback gathered from thousands of town halls and meetings with homeowners, businesses, and individual consumers, Commissioner Lara implemented an aggressive approach to modernize insurance regulations to address insurance accessibility challenges for consumers.

Commissioner Lara’s new Safer from Wildfires regulation clarifies what actions you should take to reduce wildfire risks and receive an insurance discount.

Insurance companies use computerized wildfire catastrophe models to determine which homes to write based on the risk of loss. Building on the Safer from Wildfires initiative — the nation’s first wildfire safety discount program — the strategy requires catastrophe models to account for mitigation efforts by homeowners, businesses, and communities, something not possible even a few months ago under outdated regulations.

Learn More: The Department of Insurance fact sheet is posted at CAL FIRE’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone web page where you can learn more about enhancing your property’s fire safety and view current versions of maps.

ATTACHMENT #3

Page 381 of 409 ends

insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357
Exciting News! �� The California Department of Insurance (CDI) is proud to introduce the Community Outreach and Education Partnership Initiative. This dynamic program is designed to raise consumer awareness about CDI's vital services and expand understanding of key insurance topics and fraud prevention. Become a valued partner and unlock exclusive access to:
• Comprehensive consumer education materials
• Specialized training sessions
• Powerful social media tools
Become a Partner Today: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/VHGZQHT

Page 382 of 409 ends

1 insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357
Q&A – Insurance and CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps

1.How will the updated CAL FIRE maps affect insurance availability and affordability? CAL FIRE’s maps are intended to drive local planning decisions, not insurance decisions. Under Commissioner Lara’s new regulation finalized in October 2022, insurance companies must provide discounts for wildfire safety actions such as community mitigation and home-hardening, which CAL FIRE’s maps do not assess. In addition, insurance companies are already using risk analysis tools and models that go beyond CAL FIRE’s proposed maps in determining what properties they will underwrite.

Commissioner Lara’s new wildfire safety regulation will help increase access to insurance by promoting wildfire safety across the state. Reducing wildfire risks throughout the state is the primary way we can make insurance more available and affordable, and our regulation is a major step towards that goal. CAL FIRE’s maps support that goal through improving public education about hazard and the need for safety preparation.

2.How will these maps benefit the public?
Public education about where current wildfire hazards exist is essential to reducing the threat to local communities and maintaining access to available and affordable insurance. When communities know and understand their risks, they can plan and prepare.

In addition, the Department’s first-ever report on climate insurance recommended updated wildfire hazard mapping to improve public safety.

3.If you are a homeowner and your zone changed from High Hazard to Very High Hazard, will this impact your insurance premiums or renewal ability? For many years, insurance companies have been using alternate wildfire risk tools for determining where they will write and renew policies, and how much premium to charge a policyholder, not the Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps. Therefore, a change in designation on the maps for a single homeowner is unlikely to affect their insurance. The reality is that more accurate risk information enables homeowners and communities to reduce their wildfire risks, and Commissioner Lara’s new wildfire mitigation regulation clarifies what actions you should take to reduce wildfire risks. Once that regulation is fully implemented, if a homeowner or business owner takes those risk mitigation actions, they will be able to see a discount in their insurance premium.

ATTACHMENT #4

Page 383 of 409 ends

2 insurance.ca.gov │800-927-4357

4. How is the state addressing wildfire mitigation?
By design, CAL FIRE’s maps are focused on long-range wildfire hazard, which includes only certain variables, like wind, vegetation, ember production and movement, climate, topography, and fire history. CAL FIRE’s maps will give up to date information to communities about the level of wildfire hazard they face, which could help target resources at the state and local level. Expanded state grant programs and Commissioner Lara’s new wildfire safety regulation are aimed at reducing wildfire risks to communities through programs such as Firewise USA and the new Fire Risk Reduction Community designation from the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection.

Page 384 of 409 ends

ORDINANCE NO. __

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES AS

RECOMMENDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 51178;

AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15060, 15061, AND 15378.

WHEREAS, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), pursuant to Government Code Section 51178, has developed updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps for areas within Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs); and WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 51175 through 51189 require local jurisdictions to adopt the FHSZ maps by ordinance, and to enforce the building standards for new structures in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones as established in the California Building Code and California Fire Code; and
WHEREAS, adoption of the FHSZ map will help the City reduce the risk of wildfire through updated planning and building standards and enable better protection of life, property, and natural resources; and
WHEREAS, the City of Indian Wells desires to adopt the FHSZ map as recommended by CAL FIRE to comply with state law and to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the community.

WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells to consider this Ordinance was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on May 15, 2025, a public hearing on this Ordinance was held by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, after careful consideration of the staff report and all the information, evidence, and testimony presented at its public hearing, the City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with General Plan goals and policies pertaining to public safety.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Designation of Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The City of Indian Wells hereby adopts and designates the Fire Hazard Severity Zones within the City as recommended by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and presented in the map titled:
“City of Indian Wells Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map,” as set forth in “Exhibit A” as maintained and published by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

This map is incorporated by reference and shall serve as the official FHSZ designation within the Local Responsibility Area for the City of Indian Wells.

ATTACHMENT #5

Page 385 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. __

Page 2 ends

SECTION 2. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance is based are located at 44950 Eldorado Drivee, Indian Wells, CA 92210. The custodian of these records in the City Clerk.

SECTION 3. CEQA. This ordinance was assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), and the environmental regulations of the City. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance is not subject to CEQA because the adoption of this ordinance is not a “project” under Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

Additionally, under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that the provisions contained herein would not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Moreover, the adoption of the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone map is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, as it constitutes an action taken by a regulatory agency for the protection of the environment.

SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

SECTION 5. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Not later than fifteen (15) days following the passage of this Ordinance, the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, along with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance, shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Indian Wells.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at an adjourned regular meeting held on the 15th day of May 2025.

______________________________

BRUCE WHITMAN
MAYOR

Page 386 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. __

Page 3 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss.

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS )

CERTIFICATION FOR ORDINANCE NO. ____

I, Angelica Avila, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Ordinance No. ___, having been regularly introduced at the meeting of May 15, 2025, was again introduced, the reading in full thereof unanimously waived, and duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ___of ______, 2025 said ordinance was passed and adopted by the following stated vote, to wit:

and was thereafter on said day signed by the Mayor of the City of Indian Wells.

AYES:

NOES:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________ ____________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN FOR

CITY CLERK BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY

Page 387 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. __

Page 4 ends

Exhibit “A”

“City of Indian Wells Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map,”

Page 388 of 409 ends

From:

To:Community
Subject:Re: We want your feedback on the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map! Date:Monday, April 14, 2025 9:12:42 AM
CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments.

Thank you for sharing this information. Very helpful. I did share the previous newsletter about our Class 2 Fire Protection rating (Great news!) with my insurance broker as my homeowners insurance company has decided to pull out of California with no claims on my part. It's getting harder and harder to find coverage. I'll share this newsletter also. THANK YOU for keeping us informed.

Here are some thoughts from my broker (below) and I thought it was worth sharing. Positive for Indian Wells, but the point they make is we can do as much as possible but the risk is dependent on the preparedness of our surrounding cities and their efforts also, so that would be a great thing to understand from Palm Desert and La Quinta in our immediate vicinity. And any of the other 7 major communities in the Coachella Valley.

I like the map, it helps explain the risks visually. Videos were also good.

Thank you!
Sarah Crosby
Native Springs HOA
Any efforts made in local communities across the state are absolutely essential to minimize fire risk. The state leaders don’t want the entire burden. They want individual cities and communities to be more proactive. It has been proven when there is a local plan in place and there is a fire, the casualties of property damage become less. All insurance companies use PPC classes to determine eligibility. It gets retrieved automatically via your property address. They rely on this information to assess their risk. They can’t be too heavy with policyholders in areas of high risk so once they reach their capacity that is comfortable to them, they will no longer take on any new business. Once all cities and communities start being proactive with their own efforts these PPC’s will be updated accordingly and once the risk goes down for more areas like yours, it will open the doors for more carriers to start selling again in those areas. All neighboring cities surrounding Indian Wells and Cove communities need to get on board as well. As we all know, embers can travel for several miles. Despite these proactive efforts, your area would have limitations for defense if the neighboring areas aren’t doing their part. Anyway, this is a good start. Hats off to these communities!
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 AM City of Indian Wells wrote:

ATTACHMENT #6

Page 389 of 409 ends

1 Angelica Avila
From:Michael R. Finnell <
Sent:Monday, April 14, 2025 7:38 AM
To:City Clerk
Subject:FHSZ Mapping
CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments. ________________________________

Thankfully, we are not in a “risk zone”
If we were, I would be making a HUGE stink.

My view: it is the INSURANCE COMPANY’S responsibility to assess risk and charge appropriate premiums. It is not any other agency’s responsibility.

This additional disclosure in the real estate transaction will only harm values and cause confusion.

Prospective buyers will get a quote from their insurance company, then make a decision as to whether or not a purchase should be consummated.

Additional regulation, is not the answer.

CAL Fire is doing good work, but THIS is not the answer.

Page 390 of 409 ends

From:

To:Community
Subject:Re: We want your feedback on the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map! Date:Monday, April 14, 2025 2:15:13 PM
CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments.

I live at Dorado Villas in Indian Wells, so feel pretty secure here.

Josie Flynn.

Sent from my iPad
On Apr 14, 2025, at 7:17 AM, City of Indian Wells
wrote:

Updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map

Page 391 of 409 ends

1 Angelica Avila
From:Dennis French
Sent:Monday, April 14, 2025 7:32 AM
To:City Clerk
Cc:Sharon French
Subject:Seems rigged
CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments. ________________________________

There are many areas in the red zone that are perfectly safe while others should have concerns.

My ﬁrst impression is to lump so many good locations, some with no ﬁre history, is kind of a scam to raise insurance costs and revenues unfairly, to beneﬁt the insurance companies that just had major losses.

Kindest Regards,
Dennis D. French
C.E.O
Equity Directions Inc.

Page 392 of 409 ends

From:

To:Community
Subject:Re: We want your feedback on the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map! Date:Monday, April 14, 2025 10:39:54 AM
CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments.

Thanks for the fire hazard map. However, I am concerned that Indian Wells is very exposed to the hazards of a major earthquake. This exposure is high due to: 1. large number of bridges whose damage could block exit routes; 2. presence of gas pipelines which when damaged could trigger major fires in a parched environment; 3. lack of fireproof building codes (e.g., concrete residence sidewalls). Can we have a separate effort that ignores the insurance bogeyman to get to the dangers that we face? John Soden
Indian Wells
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 AM City of Indian Wells wrote:

Page 393 of 409 ends

1 Angelica Avila
From:Patricia Sandoval <
Sent:Monday, April 14, 2025 9:16 AM
To:City Clerk
Subject:I am not sure what the map indicates. Are we ( I live on ) in a high hazard not risk in the area we reside
CAUTION: This email originated outside our organization. Be cautious with any links or attachments. a high risk area? Do we have enough fire fighting support should a fire hit our neighborhood?

Thank you, Respectfully, Patricia Sandoval

Page 394 of 409 ends

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025

To: City Council
From: Community Development Department
Prepared by: Wes Remaklus, Building Official/Code Enforcement Manager Subject: Ordinance Requiring Emergency Access Preemption Systems on New and Existing Gated Community Access
Points

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council INTRODUCES Ordinance requiring the installation of emergency access preemption systems compatible with the emergency vehicle equipment currently in use by the City’s emergency service providers (e.g., infrared-based sensor systems such as Opticom) at all existing and future gated vehicular access points in the City of Indian Wells; and

FINDS the ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(3) and 15061(b)(3).

BACKGROUND:

The City of Indian Wells contains numerous community access points, all of which are currently equipped with key boxes (commonly referred to as Knox Boxes) in compliance with the California Fire Code. These Knox Boxes allow fire and law enforcement personnel to unlock, and manually secure gates open during emergency response. However, responders must first exit their vehicles to engage the manual system, delaying entry by approximately 30 seconds, as estimated by CalFire.

In 2023, the City issued letters to each gated community, encouraging voluntary installation of emergency access preemption systems (commonly referred to as Opticom systems), which allow emergency vehicles to trigger gates to open automatically via on- board infrared emitters. Despite these outreach efforts, only the gates at the Indian Wells Villas and Mountain View Villas have been equipped with both key boxes and Opticom- compatible sensor equipment.

To address the void in city-wide expedient access and support faster response times, the Public Safety Committee recommended that Council mandate the installation of

Page 395 of 409 ends

emergency vehicle preemption systems on all existing gates within 12 months and require the systems on all new gates and newly developed gated communities.

At the May 15, 2025, City Council meeting, Council approved Option 1 of the staff recommendation, which authorized:

 Implementation of a six-month rebate program, offering $500 per gate for communities that install emergency vehicle preemption systems and provide proof of payment and installation; and

 Direction to staff to prepare an ordinance mandating the installation of these systems on all existing and future gated developments.

The purpose of this ordinance is to formally codify the mandate under the Indian Wells Municipal Code and establish compliance timelines for all impacted communities.

DISCUSSION:

At the April 16, 2025, Public Safety Committee meeting, the Committee recommended that the City Council implement a program to require the installation of compatible emergency vehicle preemption systems at each of the existing automated gates in the community within the next twelve months, regardless if these gates are manned or unmanned.

The proposed ordinance formalizes the City’s commitment to ensuring uninterrupted emergency access at all gated community entry points. It requires all existing gates to be retrofitted with compatible emergency vehicle preemption systems within twelve (12) months of adoption, and all newly constructed gates or gated developments to include compatible emergency vehicle preemption systems as a general development condition of approval. For all newly constructed gates or gated developments, the following conditions of approval will apply:

Prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy, final site inspection approval from the Planning and Building Departments, or the release of any applicable performance or completion bonds, the applicant shall install an emergency vehicle preemption system at all gated vehicular access points. The system shall be compatible with the emergency access equipment utilized by first responders serving the City of Indian Wells. If the access gate is installed prior to final development approval, the emergency access sensor system shall be installed and fully operational during construction to ready emergency access at all times.

The ordinance is performance-based and does not specify a proprietary product; instead, it requires compatibility with the emergency vehicle equipment currently deployed by

Page 396 of 409 ends

responding agencies within Indian Wells, such as the infrared-based activation systems installed on CalFire and Riverside County Sheriff vehicles.

During the May 15, 2025, City Council meeting, when the emergency access rebate program was approved, it was noted that the forthcoming ordinance would likely be incorporated into Section 16.32 of the Municipal Code. Upon further evaluation, staff believes that codifying the ordinance under Title 9 (Peace, Safety, and Morals) is a more efficient and appropriate approach. This decision is not intended to circumvent any legislative procedures, but rather to streamline implementation and ensure proper alignment with the ordinance’s public safety objectives.

Title 9 provides a broader public safety framework that better reflects the ordinance’s intent to ensure timely emergency access for all first responders, not just fire personnel.

By adopting the ordinance under Title 9, the City can enforce the requirement more holistically across all forms of emergency response, rather than through narrowly tailored building code provisions that focus solely on fire agency operations and require re- adoption on a triennial basis.

Moreover, adopting under Title 9 allows the City to maintain administrative efficiency through standard public notice and adoption procedures without triggering the more complex procedural requirements associated with code adoption by reference under California Government Code §§ 50022.1–50022.10. This approach ensures consistent enforcement and effective communication with HOAs and districts having responsibility of access gates.

The ordinance will be enforced by the Code Enforcement Division, with compliance deadlines tracked and verified. The six-month rebate program previously approved by Council remains active and provides a $500 incentive per gate for qualifying installations.

This rebate is available to HOAs and responsible entities who complete installation and submit proof within the initial program window.

To support compliance, the ordinance includes enforcement provisions consistent with Chapter 1.20 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code. Non-compliance with the installation requirements may result in administrative citations, with each day of continued violation considered a separate offense. The ordinance also establishes that violations constitute a public nuisance, providing the City with additional authority to ensure timely and uniform implementation across all gated communities.

The rebate program will officially begin following the introduction and adoption of the ordinance, which is anticipated to occur at the July 2025 City Council meeting. Per standard procedure under the Indian Wells Municipal Code, the ordinance will become effective 30 days after adoption, meaning the rebate program is expected to launch in August 2025. Following the second reading and approval, the City will notify all gated communities of the new emergency vehicle preemption system requirements. Outreach

Page 397 of 409 ends

will include posting information on the City website, issuing a resident e-blast encouraging individuals to inform their respective homeowners associations, and mailing formal notices by certified mail directly to HOA boards. These notifications will include the implementation deadline and instructions for applying to the rebate program.

OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options:
 Approve the staff’s recommendations as presented.
 Decline introducing the ordinance requiring installation of emergency access at all gated community entry points.
 Amend the proposed ordinance and introduce.
 Provide alternative directions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no additional fiscal impact associated with adoption of the ordinance. The previously approved $15,000 supplemental appropriation for the rebate program, allocated from Account 228.73.01.564000, is sufficient to support sensor installati ons at all gated access points citywide.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOAL:

The adoption of this ordinance requiring emergency access preemption systems on new and existing gated community access points and the implementation of the corresponding rebate program supports the City Council Public Safety Goal approved April 17, 2025.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(3) & 15061(b)(3), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. The required equipment is low impact, installed on existing structures, and does not expand use or intensify development.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance

Page 398 of 409 ends

ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.50 TO TITLE 9 (PEACE, SAFETY, AND

MORALS) OF THE INDIAN WELLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO REQUIRE

ACCESS BY MEANS OF APPROVED EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION

SYSTEMS AT VEHICULAR GATES, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE

EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA).

WHEREAS, the City of Indian Wells, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by California Constitution Article XI, Section 7 to make and enforce within its limits all local ordinances, and regulations not in conflict with general laws; WHEREAS, the City has the authority under Article 11, Section 5 of the California Constitution and the City Charter to make, amend, and enforce all ordinances and regulations with respect to municipal affairs to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City places high value on protecting community charter, land values, and the general public, health, safety and welfare, and has previously adopted numerous ordinances to help ensure such protection; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to ensure that all emergency responders have timely and reliable access to gated properties throughout the community in order to improve emergency response times and public safety; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to require the installation of City-approved emergency vehicle preemption systems at all automated vehicular access gates within the City of Indian Wells, for both existing and newly constructed gated properties, and new gates install at existing properties, in a manner consistent with the public safety objectives of the city; and WHEREAS, on May 15, 2025, the City Council approved a $15,000 supplemental appropriation to implement a limited-term rebate program offering $500 per qualifying gate to assist gated properties with the timely installation of approved emergency access sensor systems; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. CEQA. This ordinance was assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), and the environmental regulations of the City. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance is not subject to CEQA because the adoption of this ordinance is not a “project” under Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

ATTACHMENT #1

Page 399 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. ___

Page 2 ends

Section 3. IWMC Addition. Chapter 9.50 [Emergency Access to Vehicular Gates] of the Indian Wells Municipal Code is hereby added to read in its entirety as provided in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated within

Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Section 6. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Ordinance is based are located at the City Clerk’s office located at 44950 Eldorado Drive, Indian Wells, CA 92210. The custodian of these records is the City Clerk.

Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any entity, person or circumstance is held for any reason to be invalid or unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council and the people of the City of Indian Wells hereby declare that they would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 8. Publication; Effective Date. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance. Not later than 15 days following the passage of this Ordinance, the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, along with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance, shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Indian Wells.

PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, at an adjourned regular meeting held on the 10th day of June 2025.

________________________

BRUCE WHITMAN
MAYOR

Page 400 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. ___

Page 3 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS)

CERTIFICATION FOR ORDINANCE NO. ____

I, Angelica Avila, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Ordinance , having been regularly introduced at an adjourned regular meeting of June 10, 2025 was again introduced, the reading in full thereafter unanimously waived, and duly passed and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council held on July 2, 2025 and said Ordinance was passed and adopted by the following stated vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

and was thereafter on said day signed by the Mayor of said City of Indian Wells.

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________________ ________________________________

ANGELICA AVILA TODD LEISHMAN FOR

CITY CLERK BEST, BEST & KRIEGER

CITY ATTORNEY

Page 401 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. ___

Page 4 ends

EXHIBIT “A”
Added Chapter 9.50 to the IWMC – Emergency Access to Vehicular Gates (follows this page)

Page 402 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. ___

Page 5 ends

Exhibit A: Code Addition

Chapter 9.50 is hereby added to Title 9 Peace, Safety, and Morals, to read in its entirety as follows:

Chapter 9.50 Emergency Access to Vehicular Gates
§ 9.50.010 Purpose and Intent.

The purpose of this chapter is to enhance public safety by ensuring timely and unobstructed access for emergency response vehicles to all gated properties within the City of Indian Wells. This chapter established minimum emergency access requirements for automated vehicular gates, mandating the installation of approved emergency vehicle preemption systems that are compatible with equipment used by all agencies providing emergency services to the City. This requirement is in addition to and does not replace or supersede other emergency access obligations established by federal law, state law, adopted fire code or other applicable regulations.

§ 9.50.020 Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and terms shall apply:

a) “Emergency Vehicle Preemption System” means a wireless device capable of receiving signals from authorized emergency vehicles to automatically open vehicular gates.

b) “Vehicular Access Gate” means any gate, barrier, or access control point that restricts vehicular entry to a property, regardless of whether the access is automated, or staffed by on-site personnel.

c) “Gated Property” means any residential community, commercial site, or other development that restricts vehicular access through mechanical or electronic gate systems.

§ 9.50.030 Applicability.

a) All exiting automated vehicular access gates within the City, whether located at residential gated communities, commercial properties, or other gated developments;

b) All new, replacement, or additional vehicular access gates installed after the effective date of this ordinance, including any new gates added to existing properties or developments;

c) This chapter shall apply to all automated vehicular access gates described herein, including gates that are staffed by personnel.

Page 403 of 409 ends

City of Indian Wells
Ordinance No. ___

Page 6 ends

§ 9.50.040 Installation Requirements.

a) All automated vehicular gates subject to this chapter shall be equipped with an emergency access preemption system approved by the City and compatible with the emergency response vehicle equipment used by all agencies serving the City of Indian Wells.

b) Installation of the required system shall occur:

1) Within twelve (12) months of the ordinance’s effective date for existing gates;

2) Prior to final inspection or occupancy for new replacement gates.

c) The systems must remain operational at all times. If the gate is installed prior to completion of development, the emergency access system shall be active during construction.

§ 9.50.050 Manual Override.

All gates shall retain a City-approved manual override mechanism as a secondary access method.

§ 9.50.060 Enforcement.

a) The City may conduct inspections to verify installation and functionality.

b) Responsible parties must submit documentation of system type and operational status upon request of the City Official.

§ 9.50.070 Violations.

a) Failure to comply with this chapter constitutes a violation of the Indian Wells Municipal Code and is subject to enforcement under Chapter 1.20

b) Each day that a violation continues shall constitute a separate offense.

c) A violation of this chapter is declared to be a public nuisance and may be abated in accordance with Chapter 8.08 of the Indian Wells Municipal Code, including all applicable provisions for notice, hearing, enforcement, and cost recovery.

§ 9.50.080 Supplemental to Other Legal Requirements

This ordinance shall not be construed to relieve any property owner, responsible party, or other entity from complying with other emergency access requirements established under the California Fire Code, the California Penal Code, or any other applicable law or regulation governing emergency access.

Page 404 of 409 ends

INDIAN WELLS CITY COUNCIL
June 10, 2025

To: City Council
From: City Manager Department
Prepared by: Christopher Freeland, City Manager
Subject: Discussion on the Formation of the Coachella Valley Coalition for Clean Air

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:

Council DISCUSSES and provides DIRECTION on the formation of the Coachella Valley Coalition for Clean Air, led by Councilmember Taylor; and

FINDS the project to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060.

BACKGROUND:

At the May 15, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council approved Councilmember Taylor’s request to have a discussion regarding the formation of the Coachella Valley Coalition for Clean Air. Councilmember Taylor requests to lead this effort.

In Councilmember Taylor’s research on existing studies done on the air quality in the Coachella Valley, this region experiences a disproportionately high level of air particulate, which has been shown to harm public health, exacerbate respiratory conditions, road safety, especially on our local highways, and impact economic sustainability for local businesses. Residents, workers, and visitors alike are affected by harmful air quality, particularly the alarming rates of ozone and particulate matter pollution that surpass safe levels in the region. Efforts to address this issue have not been successful.

Coalition Description and Indian Wells’ Role

According to Councilmember Taylor, the CV Coalition for Clean Air is a public/private organization dedicated to pressing the various government agencies to conduct research and find solutions for addressing and solving the airborne dust/particulate matter that plagues the Coachella Valley economically and medically.

Currently the Coalition has endorsements from the Visit Greater Palm Springs, Chamber of Commerce, Hyatt, Marriott/Renaissance, and former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, among others.

Page 405 of 409 ends

The City of Indian Wells is being asked to be the founding city partner. Other Coachella Valley cities and the United States Marine Corps Base at Twenty-Nine Palms have been approached for their support and to participate in seeking solutions.

The City of Indian Wells, as a founding partner, may be asked from time to time to contribute resources toward this endeavor, such as investment in research, lobbying groups, marketing and more. The City’s Ad-hoc Committee, consisting of Councilmembers Penna and Sanders, and city staff may be asked to assist as well.

Policy Demands of the Coalition

The Coachella Valley Coalition for Clean Air is calling on local, state, and federal agencies to:
 Conduct research on the health implications of air borne particulate matter, specifically PM10.
 Analyze the economic impacts airborne particulate matter has on the local economy.
 Study impacts on road safety caused by airborne particulate matter, especially during large dust storms.
 Implement aggressive air quality improvement plans that significantly reduce particulate matter and ozone pollution.
 Review the toxicity of airborne matter emanating from the Salton Sea.  Enhance environmental monitoring and public health protections to ensure communities are informed and safeguarded, especially those more vulnerable communities.

Attached is a draft press release that Councilmember Taylor has asked to be included in this report, which includes the various proposed policy demands of the coalition.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC GOAL:

At the April 17, 2025, City Council Strategic Planning Session, the Council approved the formation of an Ad-hoc Committee, consisting of Councilmembers Penna and Sanders, to “advocate to regional, county, state, and federal legislators and agencies to address public health and economic/tourism impacts of Coachella Valley Air Quality (Dust) resulting from Tropical Storm Hillary.”

According to the staff report-Windblown dust has become more prevalent in the Coachella Valley and many associate the increase in poor air quality as a result of Tropical Storm Hillary. Dust particles represent a threat to the public health of the community and our regional economy. Council has instructed staff to work with the ad hoc committee to advocate to regional, county, state, and federal officials to study the air quality of the Coachella Valley and provide recommendations to protect our communities.

Page 406 of 409 ends

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action has been reviewed per the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State and local CEQA Guidelines, and the City's environmental regulations. The City, acting as the Lead Agency, determined that this resolution is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment as there is no possibility that the action would result in a significant environmental impact, and because it does not constitute a “project” as defined in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft Coachella Valley Clean Air Coalition Press Release

Page 407 of 409 ends

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

COACHELLA VALLEY COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR DEMANDS URGENT ACTION

ON POLLUTION
Coachella Valley, CA — Today, a powerful new coalition of government leaders and business organizations across the Coachella Valley has united to demand clean air for all residents, workers, and visitors. The Coachella Valley Coalition for Clean Air, founded by the cities of Indian Wells, La Quinta, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and Indio— along with prominent businesses including Eisenhower Hospital, Grand Hyatt Indian Wells Resort, the Renaissance Esmeralda Resort, and world-renowned festivals Coachella and Stagecoach—calls for immediate and ambitious action to reduce ozone and particulate matter pollution throughout the region.

The Coachella Valley experiences disproportionately high levels of air pollution, which has been shown to harm public health, exacerbate respiratory conditions, and impact economic sustainability for local businesses. Residents, workers, and visitors alike are affected by harmful air quality, particularly the alarming rates of ozone and particulate matter pollution that surpass safe levels in the region. "This coalition represents a unified voice from local governments and businesses demanding immediate action to protect public health, our environment, and our economy," said Indian Wells Councilman Toper Taylor. "We will no longer accept slow- moving policies that fail to address the crisis. It is time for government organizations at all levels to commit to ambitious and meaningful air pollution reduction efforts in the Coachella Valley."
ATTACHMENT #1

Page 408 of 409 ends

Key Policy Demands of the Coalition
The Coachella Valley Coalition for Clean Air is calling on local, state, and federal agencies to:
• Conduct research on the health implications of air borne particulate matter, specifically PM10.
• Implement aggressive air quality improvement plans that significantly reduce particulate matter and ozone pollution.
• Review the toxicity of airborne matter emanating from the Salton Sea. • Enhance environmental monitoring and public health protections to ensure communities are informed and safeguarded, especially those more vulnerable communities.

The coalition will work to hold government entities accountable, advocate for stronger environmental policies, fund research, and partner with businesses to create a cleaner, healthier Coachella Valley.

For more information on the Coachella Valley Coalition for Clean Air, visit www.cvcleanair.org or contact Toper Taylor at [email protected]

Page 409 of 409 ends

Indian Wells City CouncilJune 10, 2025

Indian Wells City Council
June 10, 2025