Agenda — Indio City Council, September 18, 2023 (part 10 of 10)

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1147 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = Existing + Project (Without Closure) PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 43 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 673 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 227 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #2
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 673 227
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\02 - EP\02R_PM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 5-18

Page 349 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1148 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
WITHOUT INDIO TOWN CENTER CONNNECTION TO AVENUE 43
5-19

Page 350 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1149 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5-20

Page 351 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1150 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings E+P AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Page 352 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1151 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC E+P AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 14
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 98 233 100 9 342 253 24
Future Vol, veh/h 98 233 100 9 342 253 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 055055
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length 160 - 50 140 - 125 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222
Mvmt Flow 107 253 109 10 372 275 26
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 372 0 0 367 0 683 137
Stage 1 - - - - - 472 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 211 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ---- 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ---- 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 834 - - 1188 - 383 886
Stage 1 - - - - - 594 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 804 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 834 - - 1182 - 328 878
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 328 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 516 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 794 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.3 0.2 49.7

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 328 878 834 - - 1182 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.838 0.03 0.128 - - 0.008 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 53.5 9.2 9.9 - - 8.1 -
HCM Lane LOS F A A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.4 0.1 0.4 - - 0 -
5-22

Page 353 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1152 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings E+P AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 98 233 100 9 342 253 24
Future Volume (vph) 98 233 100 9 342 253 24
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 5221688
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 30.0 45.0 45.0 24.0 39.0 51.0 51.0
Total Split (%) 25.0% 37.5% 37.5% 20.0% 32.5% 42.5% 42.5% Maximum Green (s) 25.5 40.5 40.5 19.5 34.5 46.5 46.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None None Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 5 5 5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
5-23

Page 354 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1153 of 1306 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary E+P AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 98 233 100 9 342 253 24
Future Volume (veh/h) 98 233 100 9 342 253 24
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 253 109 10 372 275 26
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1570 696 45 1851 661 588
Arrive On Green 0.44 0.44 0.02 0.52 0.37 0.37
Sat Flow, veh/h 3647 1576 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 253 109 10 372 275 26
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1576 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 5.0 0.7 6.7 13.8 1.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 5.0 0.7 6.7 13.8 1.3
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1570 696 45 1851 661 588
V/C Ratio(X) 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.20 0.42 0.04
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1570 696 260 1851 661 588
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.1 20.1 57.4 15.4 28.1 24.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.5 2.5 0.1 1.9 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 1.9 0.3 2.6 6.2 0.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.4 20.6 59.9 15.4 30.0 24.3
LnGrp LOS C C E B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 362 382 301
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.4 16.6 29.5
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 59.5 69.0 51.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 40.5 34.5 46.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 7.1 8.7 15.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 2.2 0.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.6
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
5-24

Page 355 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1154 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings E+P AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 73 72 1 18 24 53 1 107 54 49 36 24 Future Volume (vph) 73 72 1 18 24 53 1 107 54 49 36 24
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 40
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 10.9 12.7 7.6 45.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
5-25

Page 356 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1155 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC E+P AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Urban Crossroads, Inc.

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 72 1 18 24 53 1 107 54 49 36 24
Future Vol, veh/h 73 72 1 18 24 53 1 107 54 49 36 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - 100 - - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 80 79 1 20 26 58 1 118 59 54 40 26
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 84 0 0 80 0 0 368 364 80 423 335 55 Stage 1 - - - - - - 240 240 - 95 95 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 128 124 - 328 240 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1513 - - 1518 - - 588 564 980 541 585 1012 Stage 1 - - - - - - 763 707 - 912 816 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 876 793 - 685 707 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1513 - - 1518 - - 515 527 980 401 547 1012 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 515 527 - 401 547 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 723 670 - 864 805 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 801 783 - 503 670 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 3.8 1.4 13 13

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 515 624 1513 - - 1518 - - 401 670
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.284 0.053 - - 0.013 - - 0.134 0.098 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 13 7.5 - - 7.4 - - 15.4 11
HCM Lane LOS B B A - - A - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.2 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.5 0.3
5-26

Page 357 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1156 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings E+P PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Future Volume (vph) 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
5-27

Page 358 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1157 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC E+P PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.5
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Future Vol, veh/h 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 055055
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length 160 - 50 140 - 125 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222
Mvmt Flow 57 557 278 23 408 172 13
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 408 0 0 840 0 931 289
Stage 1 - - - - - 676 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 255 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ---- 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ---- 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 792 - - 791 - 266 708
Stage 1 - - - - - 467 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 764 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 792 - - 787 - 237 701
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 237 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 431 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 738 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0.5 49

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 237 701 792 - - 787 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.725 0.019 0.071 - - 0.029 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 52 10.2 9.9 - - 9.7 -
HCM Lane LOS F B A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.9 0.1 0.2 - - 0.1 -
5-28

Page 359 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1158 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings E+P PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Future Volume (vph) 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 5221688
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 24.0 59.0 59.0 19.0 54.0 42.0 42.0
Total Split (%) 20.0% 49.2% 49.2% 15.8% 45.0% 35.0% 35.0% Maximum Green (s) 19.5 54.5 54.5 14.5 49.5 37.5 37.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 5 5 5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
5-29

Page 360 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1159 of 1306 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary E+P PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Future Volume (veh/h) 52 512 256 21 375 158 12
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 557 278 23 408 172 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1555 689 186 2117 527 469
Arrive On Green 0.44 0.44 0.10 0.60 0.30 0.30
Sat Flow, veh/h 3647 1576 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 557 278 23 408 172 13
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1576 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 12.5 14.5 1.4 6.3 9.0 0.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.5 14.5 1.4 6.3 9.0 0.7
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1555 689 186 2117 527 469
V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.40 0.12 0.19 0.33 0.03
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1555 689 186 2117 527 469
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.5 23.1 48.8 11.1 32.9 30.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.8 0.3 0.2 1.6 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.2 5.5 0.6 2.3 4.2 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.2 24.8 49.1 11.3 34.6 30.1
LnGrp LOS C C D B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 835 431 185
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.7 13.3 34.3
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 59.0 78.0 42.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.5 54.5 49.5 37.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 16.5 8.3 11.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.8 2.6 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
5-30

Page 361 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1160 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings E+P PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 46 46 1 58 77 54 1 68 34 40 114 78 Future Volume (vph) 46 46 1 58 77 54 1 68 34 40 114 78
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 16.4 19.0 7.6 60.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
5-31

Page 362 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1161 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC E+P PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 46 1 58 77 54 1 68 34 40 114 78
Future Vol, veh/h 46 46 1 58 77 54 1 68 34 40 114 78
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - 100 - - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 57 57 1 72 95 67 1 84 42 49 141 96
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 162 0 0 58 0 0 563 478 58 508 445 129 Stage 1 - - - - - - 172 172 - 273 273 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 391 306 - 235 172 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1417 - - 1546 - - 437 486 1008 475 508 921 Stage 1 - - - - - - 830 756 - 733 684 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 633 662 - 768 756 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1417 - - 1546 - - 281 445 1008 365 465 921 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 281 445 - 365 465 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 797 726 - 704 652 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 424 631 - 625 726 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 3.8 2.3 13.5 15.6

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 281 547 1417 - - 1546 - - 365 582
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0.23 0.04 - - 0.046 - - 0.135 0.407 HCM Control Delay (s) 17.9 13.5 7.6 - - 7.4 - - 16.4 15.4 HCM Lane LOS C B A - - A - - C C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.9 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.5 2
5-32

Page 363 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1162 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = Existing + Project (With Closure) AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 42 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 782 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 277 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #1
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 782 277
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\03 - EP (with Closure)\01R_AM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 5-33

Page 364 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1163 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = Existing + Project (With Closure) PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 42 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 1,216 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 170 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #1
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 1216
170
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\03 - EP (with Closure)\01R_PM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 5-34

Page 365 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1164 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = Existing + Project (With Closure) AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Calhoun St. Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 271 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Avenue 43 High Volume Approach (VPH) = 146 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #2
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\03 - EP (with Closure)\02R_AM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 5-35

Page 366 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1165 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = Existing + Project (With Closure) PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Calhoun St. Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 335 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Avenue 43 High Volume Approach (VPH) = 189 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #2
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 335
189
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\03 - EP (with Closure)\02R_PM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 5-36

Page 367 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1166 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
ATTACHMENT 6: LONG RANGE FUTURE TRAFFIC INTERSECTION

OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 368 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1167 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Page 369 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1168 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
WITH INDIO TOWN CENTER CONNNECTION TO AVENUE 43
6-1

Page 370 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1169 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
6-2

Page 371 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1170 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour
1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Future Volume (vph) 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 40
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 45.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-3

Page 372 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1171 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour
1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13.6
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Future Vol, veh/h 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 055055
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length 160 - 50 140 - 125 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222
Mvmt Flow 117 279 98 11 324 260 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 324 0 0 382 0 707 150
Stage 1 - - - - - 518 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 189 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ---- 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ---- 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 894 - - 1173 - 370 870
Stage 1 - - - - - 563 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 824 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 894 - - 1167 - 316 862
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 316 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 487 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 812 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.3 0.3 48.4

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 316 862 894 - - 1167 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.822 0.033 0.131 - - 0.009 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 52.6 9.3 9.6 - - 8.1 -
HCM Lane LOS F A A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7 0.1 0.5 - - 0 -
6-4

Page 373 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1172 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour
1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Future Volume (vph) 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 5221688
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 32.0 44.0 44.0 25.0 37.0 51.0 51.0
Total Split (%) 26.7% 36.7% 36.7% 20.8% 30.8% 42.5% 42.5% Maximum Green (s) 27.5 39.5 39.5 20.5 32.5 46.5 46.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None None Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 5 5 5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
6-5

Page 374 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1173 of 1306 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Future Volume (veh/h) 108 257 90 10 298 239 26
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 279 98 11 324 260 28
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1570 696 45 1851 661 588
Arrive On Green 0.44 0.44 0.02 0.52 0.37 0.37
Sat Flow, veh/h 3647 1576 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 279 98 11 324 260 28
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1576 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 4.4 0.7 5.8 12.9 1.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 4.4 0.7 5.8 12.9 1.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1570 696 45 1851 661 588
V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.14 0.25 0.18 0.39 0.05
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1570 696 275 1851 661 588
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 19.9 57.4 15.2 27.8 24.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.4 2.8 0.0 1.8 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 1.7 0.4 2.2 5.8 0.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.5 20.4 60.2 15.2 29.6 24.3
LnGrp LOS C C E B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 377 335 288
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.5 16.7 29.1
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 59.5 69.0 51.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 39.5 32.5 46.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 7.7 7.8 14.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.7
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
6-6

Page 375 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1174 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38 Future Volume (vph) 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 40
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 10.9 12.7 7.6 45.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-7

Page 376 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1175 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38 Future Vol, veh/h 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - 100 - - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 75 166 1 20 112 64 1 118 59 59 40 42
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 176 0 0 167 0 0 542 533 167 589 501 144 Stage 1 - - - - - - 317 317 - 184 184 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 225 216 - 405 317 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1400 - - 1411 - - 451 453 877 420 472 903 Stage 1 - - - - - - 694 654 - 818 747 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 778 724 - 622 654 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1400 - - 1411 - - 380 423 877 292 440 903 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 380 423 - 292 440 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 657 619 - 774 737 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 692 714 - 445 619 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.4 0.8 15.7 15.5

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 380 512 1400 - - 1411 - - 292 597
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.346 0.053 - - 0.014 - - 0.203 0.136 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.5 15.7 7.7 - - 7.6 - - 20.4 12 HCM Lane LOS B C A - - A - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.5 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.7 0.5
6-8

Page 377 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1176 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38 Future Volume (vph) 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 40
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 10.9 12.7 7.6 45.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-9

Page 378 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1177 of 1306 HCM 6th AWSC GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.2
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38 Future Vol, veh/h 68 151 1 18 102 58 1 107 54 54 36 38
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 75 166 1 20 112 64 1 118 59 59 40 42
Number of Lanes 110110110101
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2222
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2222
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2222
HCM Control Delay 10.3 10.2 10.7 9.6

HCM LOS BBBA

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 66% 0% 99% 0% 64% 0% 49%
Vol Right, % 0% 34% 0% 1% 0% 36% 0% 51%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 1 161 68 152 18 160 54 74
LT Vol 1 0 68 0 18 0 54 0
Through Vol 0 107 0 151 0 102 0 36
RT Vol 0 54 0 1 0 58 0 38
Lane Flow Rate 1 177 75 167 20 176 59 81
Geometry Grp 77777777
Degree of Util (X) 0.002 0.282 0.129 0.266 0.035 0.271 0.108 0.128 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.473 5.73 6.234 5.725 6.311 5.549 6.525 5.655 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 554 628 576 628 568 649 550 634
Service Time 4.204 3.46 3.962 3.452 4.04 3.278 4.258 3.388 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.282 0.13 0.266 0.035 0.271 0.107 0.128 HCM Control Delay 9.2 10.7 9.9 10.5 9.3 10.3 10.1 9.2
HCM Lane LOS ABABABBA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 1.2 0.4 1.1 0.1 1.1 0.4 0.4
6-10

Page 379 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1178 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour
1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Future Volume (vph) 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-11

Page 380 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1179 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour
1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Future Vol, veh/h 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 055055
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length 160 - 50 140 - 125 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222
Mvmt Flow 62 346 240 25 387 158 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 387 0 0 591 0 724 183
Stage 1 - - - - - 475 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 249 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ---- 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ---- 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 816 - - 981 - 361 828
Stage 1 - - - - - 592 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 769 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 816 - - 976 - 322 820
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 322 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 544 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 745 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 0.5 25

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 322 820 816 - - 976 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.489 0.017 0.076 - - 0.026 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 26.4 9.5 9.8 - - 8.8 -
HCM Lane LOS D A A - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.6 0.1 0.2 - - 0.1 -
6-12

Page 381 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1180 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour
1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Future Volume (vph) 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 5221688
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 27.0 58.0 58.0 20.0 51.0 42.0 42.0
Total Split (%) 22.5% 48.3% 48.3% 16.7% 42.5% 35.0% 35.0% Maximum Green (s) 22.5 53.5 53.5 15.5 46.5 37.5 37.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 5 5 5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
6-13

Page 382 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1181 of 1306 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Future Volume (veh/h) 57 318 221 23 356 145 13
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 346 240 25 387 158 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1525 676 200 2117 527 469
Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.11 0.60 0.30 0.30
Sat Flow, veh/h 3647 1576 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 346 240 25 387 158 14
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1576 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 12.3 1.5 5.9 8.2 0.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.4 12.3 1.5 5.9 8.2 0.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1525 676 200 2117 527 469
V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.35 0.12 0.18 0.30 0.03
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1525 676 200 2117 527 469
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.7 23.1 47.9 11.0 32.6 30.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 1.5 0.3 0.2 1.5 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.0 4.6 0.7 2.2 3.8 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.0 24.5 48.2 11.2 34.1 30.1
LnGrp LOS C C D B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 586 412 172
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.0 13.4 33.8
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 58.0 78.0 42.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 53.5 46.5 37.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 14.3 7.9 10.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.0 2.5 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.2
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
6-14

Page 383 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1182 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75 Future Volume (vph) 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 16.4 19.0 7.6 60.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-15

Page 384 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1183 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 16.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75 Future Vol, veh/h 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - 100 - - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 91 360 1 72 289 73 1 84 42 54 141 93
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 362 0 0 361 0 0 1130 1049 361 1076 1013 326 Stage 1 - - - - - - 543 543 - 470 470 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 587 506 - 606 543 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1197 - - 1198 - - 181 227 684 197 239 715 Stage 1 - - - - - - 524 520 - 574 560 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 496 540 - 484 520 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1197 - - 1198 - - 65 197 684 112 208 715 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 65 197 - 112 208 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 484 480 - 530 526 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 297 508 - 346 480 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 1.4 31.9 56

HCM LOS D F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 65 258 1197 - - 1198 - - 112 289
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 0.488 0.076 - - 0.06 - - 0.485 0.807 HCM Control Delay (s) 61.5 31.6 8.3 - - 8.2 - - 64.2 54.1 HCM Lane LOS F D A - - A - - F F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 2.5 0.2 - - 0.2 - - 2.2 6.5
6-16

Page 385 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1184 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75 Future Volume (vph) 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 16.4 19.0 7.6 60.6
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-17

Page 386 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1185 of 1306 HCM 6th AWSC GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour
2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 19.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75 Future Vol, veh/h 74 292 1 58 234 59 1 68 34 44 114 75
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222
Mvmt Flow 91 360 1 72 289 73 1 84 42 54 141 93
Number of Lanes 110110110101
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2222
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2222
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2222
HCM Control Delay 21.2 20.9 13.4 15.5

HCM LOS C C B C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 67% 0% 100% 0% 80% 0% 60%
Vol Right, % 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 40%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 1 102 74 293 58 293 44 189
LT Vol 1 0 74 0 58 0 44 0
Through Vol 0 68 0 292 0 234 0 114
RT Vol 0 34 0 1 0 59 0 75
Lane Flow Rate 1 126 91 362 72 362 54 233
Geometry Grp 77777777
Degree of Util (X) 0.003 0.271 0.187 0.69 0.148 0.68 0.121 0.47 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.491 7.734 7.382 6.869 7.422 6.767 8.047 7.248 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 421 463 486 525 483 535 445 497
Service Time 6.253 5.496 5.132 4.618 5.171 4.516 5.799 5 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.272 0.187 0.69 0.149 0.677 0.121 0.469 HCM Control Delay 11.3 13.4 11.8 23.6 11.5 22.8 11.9 16.3 HCM Lane LOS B B B C B C B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 1.1 0.7 5.3 0.5 5.1 0.4 2.5
6-18

Page 387 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1186 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 42 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 763 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 265 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #1
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 763 265
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\04 - 2040WP\01R_AM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-19

Page 388 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1187 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 42 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 975 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 158 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #1
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 975 158
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\04 - 2040WP\01R_PM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-20

Page 389 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1188 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 43 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 398 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 162 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #2
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 398 162
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\04 - 2040WP\02R_AM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-21

Page 390 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1189 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 43 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 718 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 233 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #2
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 718 233
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\04 - 2040WP\02R_PM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-22

Page 391 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1190 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
WITHOUT INDIO TOWN CENTER CONNNECTION TO AVENUE 43
6-23

Page 392 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1191 of 1306 Ave 43 / Calhoun St Residential
14744-05 - Focused Study.docx
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
6-24

Page 393 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1192 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Future Volume (vph) 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 40
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 45.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-25

Page 394 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1193 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 35.4
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Future Vol, veh/h 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 055055
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length 160 - 50 140 - 125 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222
Mvmt Flow 117 365 118 11 409 301 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 409 0 0 488 0 836 193
Stage 1 - - - - - 604 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 232 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ---- 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ---- 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 790 - - 1071 - 306 816
Stage 1 - - - - - 508 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 785 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 790 - - 1066 - ~ 256 808
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - ~ 256 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 431 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 773 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 2 0.2 141.2

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 256 808 790 - - 1066 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.176 0.035 0.149 - - 0.01 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 153.6 9.6 10.4 - - 8.4 -
HCM Lane LOS F A B - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 13.8 0.1 0.5 - - 0 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 6-26

Page 395 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1194 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBOWP AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Conn. 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Future Volume (vph) 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 5221688
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 30.0 44.0 44.0 24.0 38.0 52.0 52.0
Total Split (%) 25.0% 36.7% 36.7% 20.0% 31.7% 43.3% 43.3% Maximum Green (s) 25.5 39.5 39.5 19.5 33.5 47.5 47.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None None Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 5 5 5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
6-27

Page 396 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1195 of 1306 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryGPBOWP AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Conn. 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Future Volume (veh/h) 108 336 109 10 376 277 26
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 365 118 11 409 301 28
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1540 683 45 1821 675 601
Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.02 0.51 0.38 0.38
Sat Flow, veh/h 3647 1576 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 365 118 11 409 301 28
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1576 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 5.5 0.7 7.6 15.1 1.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 5.5 0.7 7.6 15.1 1.3
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1540 683 45 1821 675 601
V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.17 0.25 0.22 0.45 0.05
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1540 683 260 1821 675 601
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.5 20.8 57.4 16.1 27.8 23.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.5 2.8 0.1 2.1 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.2 2.1 0.4 2.9 6.8 0.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.8 21.4 60.2 16.2 30.0 23.7
LnGrp LOS C C E B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 483 420 329
Approach Delay, s/veh 21.7 17.3 29.4
Approach LOS C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 58.5 68.0 52.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.5 39.5 33.5 47.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 9.8 9.6 17.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.6 2.4 1.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
6-28

Page 397 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1196 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 73 72 1 18 24 58 1 107 54 54 36 24 Future Volume (vph) 73 72 1 18 24 58 1 107 54 54 36 24
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 40
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 10.9 12.7 7.6 45.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-29

Page 398 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1197 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project AM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 72 1 18 24 58 1 107 54 54 36 24
Future Vol, veh/h 73 72 1 18 24 58 1 107 54 54 36 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - 100 - - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 80 79 1 20 26 64 1 118 59 59 40 26
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 90 0 0 80 0 0 371 370 80 426 338 58 Stage 1 - - - - - - 240 240 - 98 98 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 131 130 - 328 240 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1505 - - 1518 - - 586 560 980 539 583 1008 Stage 1 - - - - - - 763 707 - 908 814 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 873 789 - 685 707 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1505 - - 1518 - - 512 524 980 399 545 1008 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 512 524 - 399 545 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 723 670 - 860 803 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 798 779 - 502 670 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 3.8 1.3 13.1 13.2

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 512 621 1505 - - 1518 - - 399 668
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.285 0.053 - - 0.013 - - 0.149 0.099 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 13.1 7.5 - - 7.4 - - 15.6 11
HCM Lane LOS B B A - - A - - C B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.2 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.5 0.3
6-30

Page 399 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1198 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Future Volume (vph) 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 40
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 45.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-31

Page 400 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1199 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13.7
Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Future Vol, veh/h 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 055055
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - None - None
Storage Length 160 - 50 140 - 125 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 222222
Mvmt Flow 62 613 304 25 558 188 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 558 0 0 922 0 1076 317
Stage 1 - - - - - 742 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 334 -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ---- 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ---- 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.52 - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 636 - - 736 - 214 679
Stage 1 - - - - - 432 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 697 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 636 - - 732 - ~ 185 673
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - ~ 185 -
Stage 1 - - - - - 388 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 670 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0.4 114.8

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 185 673 636 - - 732 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.016 0.021 0.097 - - 0.034 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 122.6 10.5 11.3 - - 10.1 -
HCM Lane LOS F B B - - B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 8.6 0.1 0.3 - - 0.1 -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 6-32

Page 401 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1200 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBOWP PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Conn. 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Lane Group EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Future Volume (vph) 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 160 50 140 125 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30
Link Distance (ft) 797 948 2668
Travel Time (s) 12.1 14.4 60.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8
Permitted Phases 2 8
Detector Phase 5221688
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 22.5 20.0 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 22.0 58.0 58.0 23.0 59.0 39.0 39.0
Total Split (%) 18.3% 48.3% 48.3% 19.2% 49.2% 32.5% 32.5% Maximum Green (s) 17.5 53.5 53.5 18.5 54.5 34.5 34.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Lost Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 5 5 5
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 18 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42
6-33

Page 402 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1201 of 1306 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection SummaryGPBOWP PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Conn. 1: Calhoun St. & Avenue 42 WITH IMPROVEMENTS
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\03 - With Improvements.syn Movement EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Future Volume (veh/h) 57 564 280 23 513 173 13
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 613 304 25 558 188 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 222222
Cap, veh/h 1525 676 245 2206 482 429
Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.14 0.62 0.27 0.27
Sat Flow, veh/h 3647 1576 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 613 304 25 558 188 14
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1576 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 14.3 16.4 1.5 8.5 10.3 0.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.3 16.4 1.5 8.5 10.3 0.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1525 676 245 2206 482 429
V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.45 0.10 0.25 0.39 0.03
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1525 676 245 2206 482 429
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.6 24.2 45.3 10.2 35.7 32.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 2.2 0.2 0.3 2.4 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.9 6.2 0.7 3.1 4.8 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 26.4 45.5 10.5 38.0 32.3
LnGrp LOS C C D B D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 917 583 202
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.1 12.0 37.6
Approach LOS C B D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 58.0 81.0 39.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 53.5 54.5 34.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 18.4 10.5 12.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.3 3.8 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.1
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
6-34

Page 403 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1202 of 1306 Lanes, Volumes, Timings GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 46 46 1 58 77 59 1 68 34 44 114 78 Future Volume (vph) 46 46 1 58 77 59 1 68 34 44 114 78
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 90 90 90 90
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 40 40
Link Distance (ft) 720 836 334 2668
Travel Time (s) 16.4 19.0 5.7 45.5
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
6-35

Page 404 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1203 of 1306 HCM 6th TWSC GPBO With Project PM Peak Hour w/o Indio Town Ctr. Connection 2: Calhoun St. & Avenue 43
Avenue 43 / Calhoun Street Residential Synchro 11 Report F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Synchro\02 - With Project.syn Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 46 1 58 77 59 1 68 34 44 114 78
Future Vol, veh/h 46 46 1 58 77 59 1 68 34 44 114 78
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 100 - - 100 - - 100 - - 100 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222
Mvmt Flow 57 57 1 72 95 73 1 84 42 54 141 96
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 168 0 0 58 0 0 566 484 58 511 448 132 Stage 1 - - - - - - 172 172 - 276 276 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 394 312 - 235 172 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - ----- 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1410 - - 1546 - - 435 483 1008 473 506 917 Stage 1 - - - - - - 830 756 - 730 682 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 631 658 - 768 756 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1410 - - 1546 - - 279 442 1008 363 463 917 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 279 442 - 363 463 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 797 726 - 701 650 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 422 627 - 625 726 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 3.8 2.2 13.6 15.6

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 279 544 1410 - - 1546 - - 363 580
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0.231 0.04 - - 0.046 - - 0.15 0.409 HCM Control Delay (s) 18 13.6 7.7 - - 7.4 - - 16.7 15.4 HCM Lane LOS C B A - - A - - C C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.9 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.5 2
6-36

Page 405 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1204 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT With Closure AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 42 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 939 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 303 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #1
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 939 303
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\05 - 2040WP (with Closure)\01R_AM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-37

Page 406 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1205 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT With Closure PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Avenue 42 Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 1,437 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Calhoun St. High Volume Approach (VPH) = 186 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #1
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

WARRANTED FOR A SIGNAL
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 1300
186
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\05 - 2040WP (with Closure)\01R_PM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-38

Page 407 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1206 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT With Closure AM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Calhoun St. Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 276 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Avenue 43 High Volume Approach (VPH) = 146 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #2
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\05 - 2040WP (with Closure)\02R_AM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-39

Page 408 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1207 of 1306 California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California)
Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor)
Traffic Conditions = GPBO w/ PROJECT With Closure PM PEAK HOUR WARRANTS Major Street Name = Calhoun St. Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 339 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Avenue 43 High Volume Approach (VPH) = 194 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1
Intersection ID: #2
(COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 64 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET)

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
*Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold for a minor-street approach with one lane 339
194
0 100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - Higher-Volume Approach (VPH)
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches (VPH)
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
F:\UXRjobs\_14600-15000\14744\02_LOS\Signal Warrants\05 - 2040WP (with Closure)\02R_PM.xls\Fig 4C-4 (Rural Peak) 6-40

Page 409 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1208 of 1306 1 Water Supply Assessment
for the Proposed
Calhoun Specific Plan
Prepared for:

Indio Water Authority
83101 Avenue 45
Indio, CA 92201
Prepared by:

TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC.®
42635 Melanie Place, Ste 101
PalmDesert, CA 92211
July 2022

Page 410 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1209 of 1306 2 Table of Contents
List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables................................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Summary and Requirements.............................................................................................................. 4

1.1 Regulatory Requirements................................................................................................................. 4

1.1.1 Senate Bill 610............................................................................................................................ 5

1.1.2 Senate Bill 221............................................................................................................................ 5

1.1.3 Senate Bill 1262.......................................................................................................................... 6

1.2 Water Management Planning Documents....................................................................................... 6

1.2.1 Urban Water Management Planning Act.................................................................................. 6

1.2.2 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act............................................................................. 6

1.2.3 Groundwater Replenishment.................................................................................................... 7 2 Public Water System......................................................................................................................... 10

2.1 Indio Water Authority..................................................................................................................... 10

2.1.1 Indio Water Authority – Potable Water Distribution System................................................. 11

2.2 Coachella Valley Hydrology ............................................................................................................ 11 3 Public Water System – Existing Supply and Demand....................................................................... 13

3.1 Groundwater................................................................................................................................... 13

3.1.1 Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin ...................................................................................... 13

3.1.2 Groundwater Demand............................................................................................................. 15

3.1.3 Groundwater Sustainability..................................................................................................... 16

3.2 Surface Water ................................................................................................................................. 18

3.3.1 Stormwater Capture ................................................................................................................ 18

3.3 Wastewater and Recycled Water................................................................................................... 18

3.4 Conservation ................................................................................................................................... 20

3.5 Landscape Ordinance...................................................................................................................... 20

3.6 Water Shortage Contingency Planning........................................................................................... 20 4 Public Water System – Projected Supply and Demand ................................................................... 22

4.1 Projected Urban Demand and Supply ............................................................................................ 22

4.2 Normal, Single-Dry, Multiple-Dry Year Comparison ...................................................................... 23 5 Project Description............................................................................................................................ 27 6 Project Water Demands.................................................................................................................... 29

6.1 Projected Indoor Residential Water Demand ................................................................................ 29

Page 411 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1210 of 1306 3 6.2 Projected Outdoor Irrigation Water Demand ................................................................................ 29 7 Assessment– Availability of Sufficient Supplies............................................................................... 30 8 References......................................................................................................................................... 31 List of Figures
Figure 2-1: Indio Water Authority Boundary and Cities ............................................................................ 10 Figure 3-1: Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin and Groundwater Replenishment Facilities................. 15 Figure 3-2: Historical Annual Change in Groundwater Storage in the Indio Subbasin .............................. 17 Figure 3-3: 12-Year Change in Groundwater Elevation from Water Year 2008-2009 through Water Year 2020-2021 in the Indio Subbasin............................................................................................................... 18 Figure 5-1: Project Regional Location Map................................................................................................ 27 Figure 5-2: Project Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................ 28 Figure 5-3: Project Site Plan....................................................................................................................... 28 List of Tables
Table 2-1: Current and Projected Population for IWA’s Service Area ....................................................... 11 Table 2-2: Monthly Average Climate Data for Indio.................................................................................. 12 Table 3-1: Groundwater Storage Capacity in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin ........................... 14 Table 3-2: IWA Groundwater Production in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin............................. 15 Table 3-3: Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Discharge in Indio in 2020 ......................................... 19 Table 3-4: Recycled Water Within IWA Service Area (AF) ......................................................................... 20 Table 3-5: Water Shortage Contingency Plan Shortage Levels.................................................................. 21 Table 4-1: IWA Projected Urban Retail Demands...................................................................................... 22 Table 4-2: IWA Projected Water Supplies.................................................................................................. 22 Table 4-3: IWA Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison................................................................. 23 Table 6-1: Projected Indoor Residential Water Demand........................................................................... 29 Table 6-2: Projected Outdoor Irrigation Water Demand........................................................................... 29

Page 412 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1211 of 1306 4 1 Summary and Requirements
The environmental review of the Calhoun Specific Plan (Project) is being prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. The City of Indio is the Lead Agency for the planning and environmental review of the proposed Project. The City has identified the Indio Water Authority (IWA) as the Public Water System (PWS) that will supply water for the proposed Project, and has requested that IWA assist in preparing a Water Supply Assessment (WSA/ as part of the environmental review for the Project.

The Project is located in the eastern portion of the Coachella Valley within the City of Indio, Riverside County. The Project proposes to develop approximately 60 acres of vacant land to include up to 1,200 residential units. This WSA determined that the total projected water demand for the Project is 287.79 AFY, or 4.8 acre-feet per acre. This WSA demonstrates that sufficient water supplies exist, or will exist based on current water planning assumptions, to meet the projected demands of the Project, in addition to current and future projected water demands within IWA’s service area in normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years over a 20-year projection.

This WSA will be reviewed every five years, or in the event that the water planning assumptions have changed, until the Project completes construction to ensure it remains accurate and no significant changes to either the Project or available water supply has occurred. This WSA does not relieve the Project from complying with all applicable state, county, city, and local ordinances or regulations including the Landscape Ordinance (Ordinance 1684), and indoor water use performance standards provided in the California Water Code (CWC).

1.1 Regulatory Requirements
This WSA provides an assessment of the availability of sufficient water supplies during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years over a 20-year projection to meet the projected demands of the Project, in addition to existing and planned future water demands of IWA, as required by Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), SB 221, and SB 1262. This WSA also includes identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, water service contracts, or agreements relevant to the identified water supply for the Project and quantities of water received in prior years pursuant to those entitlements, rights, contracts, and agreements.

This WSA has been prepared in compliance with the requirements under SB 610, SB 221, and SB 1262 by Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. in consultation with IWA and the City of Indio. This WSA does not relieve the Project from complying with all applicable state, county, city, and local ordinances or regulations, including the Landscape Ordinance (Ordinance 1684) and indoor water use performance standards provided in the California Water Code (CWC). This WSA will be reviewed every five years, or in the event that the water planning assumptions have changed, until the Project completes construction, to ensure it remains accurate and no significant changes to either the Project or available water supply has occurred. The Project applicant shall notify

Page 413 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1212 of 1306 5 IWA when construction begins. If neither the Project applicant nor the Lead Agency contacts IWA within five years of approval of this WSA, it will be assumed that the Project no longer exists and the WSA provided by this document will become invalid.

1.1.1 Senate Bill 610
On January 1, 2002, Senate Bill 610 (SB 610) was enacted and codified in CWC Section 10910 et seq., requiring the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) for certain new development projects. As stated in SB 610, the purpose of a WSA is to determine whether the PWS’s “total projected water supplies available during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry water years during a 20-year projection will meet the projected water demand associated with the proposed project, in addition to the PWS’s existing and planned future uses, including agricultural and manufacturing uses.”
CWC Section 10912 defines a “project” as any of the following:
• A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; • A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet of floor space; • A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet of floor space;
• A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms; • A proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park, planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet of floor space;
• A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in this subdivision; or
• A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of water required by a 500 dwelling unit project (about 250 acre-feet per year).

The intent of SB 610 is to improve the link between information on water supply availability and certain land-use decisions made by cities and counties.

1.1.2 Senate Bill 221
On January 1, 2002, Senate Bill 221 (SB 221) was enacted and amended Section 11010 of the Business and Professional Code. SB 221 also amended Section 65867.5 to add Section 66455.3 and 66473.7 to the Government Code. SB 221 establishes the relationship between the WSA prepared for a project and project approval under the Subdivision Map Act. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66473.7, the PWS must provide a written verification of sufficient water supply prior to the approval of a new subdivision. SB 221 states that “a Water Supply Verification (WSV) is required prior to approval of a tentative subdivision map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map is not required, or a development agreement for a subdivision of

Page 414 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1213 of 1306 6 property of more than 500 dwelling units, except as specified, including the design of the subdivision or similar type of improvement.” The Project does not propose a subdivision of property, and therefore a Water Supply Verification is not required.

1.1.3 Senate Bill 1262
On January 1, 2017, Senate Bill 1262 (SB 1262) was enacted and amended CWC Section 10910, requiring that information regarding the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) be included in a WSA if the water supply for a proposed project includes groundwater from a basin that is not adjudicated and was designated medium- or high-priority by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR).

1.2 Water Management Planning Documents
IWA has prepared long-term planning documents to better manage the water supplies within its service area. These planning documents can be used for compliance with SB 610, SB 221, and SB 1262, and are discussed in further detail in the following sections.

1.2.1 Urban Water Management Planning Act
The Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) was established by Assembly Bill 797 (AB 797) on September 21, 1983, and passage of this law recognized that water is a limited resource and that efficient water use and conservation would be actively pursued throughout the State.

The UWMPA requires that municipal water suppliers providing either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers, or supplying more the 3,000 acre-feet per year (AFY), prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years which defines their current and future water use, source of supply, source reliability, and existing conservation measures.

1.2.1.1 Indio Water Authority Urban Water Management Plan IWA prepared and adopted its 2010 and 2015 UWMPs to document IWA’s projected water demands and plans for delivering water supplies to its water service area during normal, singledry, and multiple-dry years over at least a 20-year projection.

The six urban water suppliers in the Coachella Valley (Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), Coachella Water Authority (CWA), Desert Water Agency (DWA), IWA, Mission Springs Water District (MSWD), and Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company) collaboratively prepared the 2020 Coachella Valley Regional UWMP, including regional and individual agency content and other necessary elements as set forth in DWR’s 2020 UWMP Guidebook. The 2020 Coachella Valley Regional UWMP was submitted to DWR on July 1, 2021.

1.2.2 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
In September 2014, Governor Brown signed three bills into law: Assembly Bill 1739, Senate Bill 1319, and Senate Bill 1168, which became collectively known as the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), creating a framework for sustainable, local groundwater management for the first time in California history. DWR evaluated and prioritized the 515 groundwater basins identified in Bulletin 118, and 94 of these groundwater basins were designated as high- or

Page 415 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1214 of 1306 7 medium-priority basins, as of December 2019, requiring them to be sustainably managed within 20 years. SGMA required local authorities to form local Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) by June 30, 2017 to evaluate conditions in their local groundwater basins and adopt locally-based Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs), or Alternatives to a GSP (Alternative Plans), tailored to their regional economic and environmental needs.

As defined by DWR, the subbasins of the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin are the Indio (Whitewater River), Mission Creek, San Gorgonio Pass, and Desert Hot Springs Subbasins. IWA’s service area overlies the Indio Subbasin. The Indio Subbasin has been designated mediumpriority by DWR and are subject to the requirements of SGMA. The proposed service area by IWA will overlie the Desert Hot Springs Subbasin. The Desert Hot Springs Subbasin has been designated very low-priority by DWR and is not subject to the requirements of SGMA. The Project is located within the Indio Subbasin, which has been designated as a medium priority groundwater basin by DWR under SGMA.

1.2.2.1 Alternative Plan for the Indio Subbasin
Twenty years before the adoption of SGMA, CVWD began the development of the initial water management plan for the Coachella Valley in 1994 after recognizing the need to sustainably manage the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin. The original planning document is the 2002 Coachella Valley Water Management Plan (CVWMP). The 2002 CVWMP was updated in 2010 and adopted in 2012.

CVWD, DWA, CWA, and IWA, are the Indio Subbasin GSAs designated by DWR for their respective service areas. On December 29, 2016, CVWD, DWA, CWA, and IWA collaboratively submitted the 2010 CVWMP Update as an Alternative Plan for the Indio Subbasin, with an associated Bridge Document and supporting documents, to DWR for review and evaluation. On July 17, 2019, DWR determined that the Alternative Plan for the Indio Subbasin satisfies the objectives of SGMA and notified the Indio Subbasin GSAs that the Alternative Plan was approved, and that they would be required to submit an assessment and update of the Alternative Plan pursuant to the SGMA by January 1, 2022 and every five years thereafter. The 2022 Alternative Plan Update for the Indio Subbasin was submitted to DWR on December 29, 2021.

On February 1, 2018, DWR notified all GSAs who submitted Alternative Plans that they would be required to submit annual reports pursuant to SGMA by April 1, 2018 and every year thereafter.

CVWD, DWA, CWA, and IWA have collaboratively prepared and submitted the Indio Subbasin Annual Reports for Water Years 2016-2017 through 2020-2021.

1.2.3 Groundwater Replenishment
The Indio Subbasin is divided for management into the West Valley and the East Valley. The East Valley lies southeast of a line generally extending from Point Happy (a rocky outcrop of the Santa Rosa Mountains near Washington Street and Highway 111) northeast to the Indio Hills near Jefferson Street, and the West Valley is northwest of this line. The Project is located within the East Valley. IWA does not conduct any groundwater replenishment in the Indio Subbasin.

Page 416 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1215 of 1306 8 CWC Section 31630-31639 provides CVWD with the authority to levy and collect water replenishment assessments to implement groundwater replenishment programs (GRPs) within its jurisdictional boundary. Groundwater replenishment is necessary to mitigate overdraft of the groundwater basin and associated undesirable results. The jurisdictional areas that benefit from the GRPs, and where CVWD levies replenishment assessments on groundwater production, are termed Areas of Benefit (AOBs). There are three AOBs within CVWD’s boundary: the Mission Creek Subbasin AOB, the West Whitewater River Subbasin AOB, and the East Whitewater River Subbasin AOB. The GRP for the West Whitewater River Subbasin AOB was formed in 1976, the GRP for the Mission Creek Subbasin AOB was formed in 2003, and the GRP for the East Whitewater River Subbasin AOB was formed in 2004. The Project is located within the East Whitewater River Subbasin AOB.

1.2.3.1 Annual Engineer’s Reports
CVWD is required to prepare and present to its Board of Directors annually an Engineer’s Report on Water Supply and Replenishment Assessment on the conditions of the groundwater supplies and recommend Replenishment Assessment Charges (RACs) to be levied upon groundwater production greater than 25 AFY within each AOB in accordance with CWC Section 31630-31639.

The Engineer’s Report must include the following information: a summary of the conditions of groundwater supplies; the need for replenishment; a description of the replenishment programs, including the source and amount of replenishment waters, the costs associated with the GRP, the areas directly and indirectly benefited by the GRP, and the amount of groundwater produced in each area during the prior year; and a recommendation for the RAC to be levied on each AOB.

The 2021-2022 Engineer’s Report on Water Supply and Replenishment Assessment was prepared and presented to CVWD’s Board of Directors on April 27, 2021.

1.2.4 Integrated Regional Water Management and Stormwater Resource Plan The Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) program is a local water resources management approach directed by DWR. IRWM aims at securing long-term water supply reliability within California by first recognizing the inter-connectivity of water supplies, and then encouraging the development and implementation of projects that yield combined benefits for water supplies, water quality, and natural resources.

Stormwater Resource Plan (SWRP) development is directed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and focuses on stormwater and dry weather runoff capture. Senate Bill 985 (SB 985) requires that any stormwater or dry weather runoff capture project receiving funding from any bond approved after January 1, 2014 must be included in a SWRP. SB 985 is intended to encourage the use of stormwater and dry weather runoff as a resource to improve water quality, reduce localized flooding, and increase water supplies for beneficial uses and the environment.

Page 417 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1216 of 1306 9 1.2.3.1 Coachella Valley Integrated Regional Water Management & Stormwater Resource Plan
In 2008, five public water agencies in the Coachella Valley (including IWA) formed the Coachella Valley Regional Water Management Group (CVRWMG). In 2010, they adopted the Coachella Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP). The IRWMP was updated in 2014 and 2018.1 These efforts ensure that the Coachella Valley as a whole will focus on sustainable water resources. All water agencies in the Coachella Valley work together, share information, discuss concerns and viewpoints, and build consensus in supporting future projects that benefit the entire region. Since its formation, the CVRWMG has added Valley Sanitary District (VSD) as a member.

Since both IRWM and SWR planning efforts aim to encourage implementation of multi-benefit projects that will improve water quality, reduce local flooding, and increase water supplies, the CVRWMG chose to develop a SWRP functional equivalent through the 2018 Coachella Valley IRWM/SWR Plan. The Coachella Valley IRWM/SWR Plan presents an integrated regional approach for addressing water management issues through a process that identifies and involves water management stakeholders from the Coachella Valley. 1 CVRWMG Library, http://www.cvrwmg.org/resources/library/, accessed April 22, 2022.

Page 418 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1217 of 1306 10 2 Public Water System
The City of Indio is the Lead Agency for the planning and environmental review of the proposed Calhoun Specific Plan (Project). The City has identified the Indio Water Authority (IWA) as the Public Water System (PWS) that will supply water for the proposed Project, and has requested that IWA assist in preparing a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) as part of the environmental review for the Project.

2.1 Indio Water Authority
IWA was formed as a Joint Powers Authority in 2000, wholly owned by the City of Indio and Indio Redevelopment Agency, to be the legislative and policy entity responsible for delivering water to residents of the City for all municipal water programs and services. Since 2005, IWA has established active water conservation, water reuse, and groundwater recharge planning efforts to ensure adequate water availability and system capacity to meet the growing needs of the City.

IWA’s boundary encompassing approximately 38 square miles is shown in Figure 2-1, roughly aligning with the City of Indio boundary.

Figure 2-1: Indio Water Authority Boundary and Cities
Source: Figure 7-1, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan, June 2021.

Page 419 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1218 of 1306 11 2.1.1 Indio Water Authority – Potable Water Distribution System IWA extracts groundwater from the Indio Subbasin to meet the needs of its existing customers.

IWA delivers domestic water via a pressurized distribution system of 326 miles of pipe supplied by 20 active wells. IWA also has emergency intertie connections with Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and the City of Coachella. Since the establishment of IWA, service connections have increased from approximately 12,100 to over 23,000 active meter accounts in 2018, with most of the new growth occurring north of Interstate 10. In 2020, IWA supplied approximately 20,000 acre feet (AF) of water to businesses and residents. IWA’s service area is located entirely within the City of Indio, although IWA’s sphere of influence included within its boundary can include additional Tribal lands and unincorporated areas.

The 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) projected that population in IWA’s urban water service area would increase as shown in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1: Current and Projected Population for IWA’s Service Area Population
Served
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
78,940 93,762 99,659 105,557 111,454 117,351
Source: Table 7-3, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

2.2 Coachella Valley Hydrology
The bulk of natural groundwater replenishment comes from runoff from the adjacent mountains.

Climate in the Coachella Valley is characterized by low humidity and annual rainfall, high summer temperatures, and relatively mild winters. Average annual precipitation varies from around 3 to 6 inches of rain on the Coachella Valley floor to more than 30 inches in the surrounding mountains. Most of the precipitation occurs between December and February, except for summer thundershowers. Prevailing winds in the area are usually gentle, but occasionally increase to velocities as high as 30 miles per hour or more. The annual mean rainfall is approximately 3.8 inches. The average summer high temperature in Indio is 103 degrees Fahrenheit (F); the average winter low temperature is 43 degrees F as shown in Table 2-2.

Page 420 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1219 of 1306 12 Table 2-2: Monthly Average Climate Data for Indio
Source: Table 7-2, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan Notes:

Data from California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) Station 200, Indio 2. Data from May 2006 through December 2020.
1 Average maximum temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) 2 Average minimum temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) 3 Average total precipitation in inches
4 Evapotranspiration in inches
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
Max (oF)1 72 75 82 87 93 103 106 106 101 90 80 65 88
Min (oF)2 42 45 52 58 63 70 76 75 69 59 49 39 58
Rain (in)3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.7 3.8 ETo (in)4 2.7 3.6 6 7.7 9.2 9.8 9.7 9.1 7.2 5.2 3.3 2.3 75.7

Page 421 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1220 of 1306 13 3 Public Water System – Existing Supply and Demand
Currently, all of Indio Water Authority’s (IWA’s) urban potable water uses are supplied using groundwater. IWA does not use purchased or imported water. Although both the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and Desert Water Agency (DWA) have contracted for State Water Project (SWP) and Colorado River water, these waters are currently used only to either replenish the groundwater basin via recharge, or for agricultural irrigation and other non-urban purposes.

Colorado River water is delivered to the Coachella Valley via the Coachella Canal, while SWP water is exchanged for Colorado River water from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). CVWD currently uses its Colorado River water supply for agricultural and golf course irrigation, groundwater recharge, and other non-potable uses.

3.1 Groundwater
Groundwater is the principal source of potable supply in the Coachella Valley. IWA obtains groundwater primarily from the lower aquifer in the Indio Subbasin, the largest subbasin in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin. IWA has the legal authority to manage the groundwater basin within its boundaries under the County Water District Law (California Water Code (CWC) Division 12) and as a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). Groundwater, to be supplied to the Project, is also used by other domestic water suppliers and private pumpers for crop irrigation, fish farms, duck clubs, golf course irrigation, greenhouses, and industrial uses in the Coachella Valley.

3.1.1 Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin
The Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin is bounded on the east by the non-waterbearing crystalline rocks of the San Bernardino and Little San Bernardino Mountains and on the west by the crystalline rocks of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains. The trace of the Banning fault on the north side of San Gorgonio Pass forms the upper boundary. At the west end of the San Gorgonio Pass, between Beaumont and Banning, the basin boundary is defined by a surface drainage divide separating the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin from the Beaumont Groundwater Basin of the Upper Santa Ana Drainage Area.

The southern boundary is formed primarily by the watershed of the Mecca Hills and by the northwest shoreline of the Salton Sea running between the Santa Rosa Mountains and Mortmar.

Between the Salton Sea and Travertine Rock, at the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains, the southern boundary crosses the Riverside County Line into Imperial and San Diego Counties.

Although there is interflow of groundwater throughout the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin, fault barriers, constrictions in the basin profile, and areas of low permeability limit and control movement of groundwater. Based on these factors, the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin has been divided into subbasins and subareas as described by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in 1964 and 2003, and by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in 1974.

Page 422 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1221 of 1306 14 3.1.1.1 Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin – Subbasins The boundaries between subbasins are generally defined by faults that impede the lateral movement of groundwater. Minor subareas have also been delineated based on one or more of the following geologic or hydrologic characteristics: types of water-bearing formations, water quality, areas of confined groundwater, forebay areas, groundwater divides, and surface drainage divides.

The Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin has been divided into four subbasins as defined in DWR Bulletin 118 (Figure 3-1):
• Indio Subbasin (Subbasin 7-21.01)
• Mission Creek Subbasin (Subbasin 7-21.02)
• San Gorgonio Pass Subbasin (Subbasin 7-21.03)
• Desert Hot Springs Subbasin (Subbasin 7-21.04)
The subbasins are defined without regard to water quantity or quality. They delineate areas underlain by formations which readily yield stored groundwater through water wells and offer natural reservoirs for the regulation of water supplies.

DWR designated the Indio, Mission Creek, and San Gorgonio Pass Subbasins as medium-priority, and the Desert Hot Springs Subbasin as very low priority. None of the subbasins are adjudicated or identified as being critically overdrafted as of California's Groundwater Update 2020 (Bulletin 118)2. In 1964, DWR estimated that the subbasins in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin contained approximately 39,200,000 acre-feet (AF) of water in the first 1,000 feet below the groundwater surface. The capacities of the subbasins are shown in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1: Groundwater Storage Capacity in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin Subbasin/Subarea Storage Capacity (AF) 1
Indio Subbasin
Palm Springs Subarea 4,600,000
Thousand Palms Subarea 1,800,000
Oasis Subarea 3,000,000
Garnet Hill Subarea 1,000,000
Thermal Subarea 19,400,000
Indio Subbasin Subtotal 29,800,000
Mission Creek Subbasin 2,600,000
San Gorgonio Subbasin 2,700,000
Desert Hot Springs Subbasin 4,100,000
Total 39,200,000
2 California's Groundwater Update 2020, Bulletin 118 November 2021, State of California The Natural Resources Agency Department of Water Resources.

Page 423 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1222 of 1306 15 Source: Table 2-1. Mission Creek Subbasin Annual Report for Water Year 2019-2020, February 2021.
1 Capacity in acre feet (AF) for the first 1,000 feet below ground surface estimated by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR, 1964).

Figure 3-1: Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin and Groundwater Replenishment Facilities Source: Figure 3-1. 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan, June 2021.

3.1.2 Groundwater Demand
Groundwater is the principal source of potable supply in the Coachella Valley. IWA obtains groundwater from the Indio Subbasin of the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin. IWA’s groundwater demand in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin for 2016 through 2020 is shown in Table 3-2. Because the Indio Subbasin is an un-adjudicated basin, IWA does not hold specific water rights, but rather pumps supplies from the aquifer as needed to meet demands within its service area.

Table 3-2: IWA Groundwater Production in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin Groundwater Production (AF) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Indio Subbasin 17,072 18,267 19,567 18,793 19,880
Total 17,072 18,267 19,567 18,793 19,880
Source: Table 7-13, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan

Page 424 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1223 of 1306 16 3.1.3 Groundwater Sustainability
Long-term sustainability is typically assessed based on changes in groundwater storage over a historical period on the order of ten to twenty years that includes wet and dry periods. SGMA allows a 20-year time frame for GSAs including IWA to implement their Alternative Plans and achieve long-term groundwater sustainability.

3.1.3.1 Indio Subbasin
Figure 3-2 shows the historical annual change in groundwater storage from 1970 through Water Year (WY) 2020-2021 in the Indio Subbasin. The figure also shows annual inflows, outflows, groundwater production, and 10-year and 20-year running-average change in groundwater storage. During periods of high artificial recharge, the change in storage tends to be positive. In dry years or periods of high groundwater pumping, the change in storage is often negative.

As shown in Figure 3-2, annual inflows to the Indio Subbasin are highly variable with years of high inflows corresponding to wet years when SWP delivery volumes were greater. Higher inflows in the mid-1980s occurred when the MWD commenced large-scale advanced water deliveries to the Indio Subbasin. After an extended period of decline, both the 10-year and 20-year runningaverage change in storage have shown upward trends since 2009, and the 10-year runningaverage has been positive since 2017.

Page 425 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1224 of 1306 17 Figure 3-2: Historical Annual Change in Groundwater Storage in the Indio Subbasin Source: Indio Subbasin Annual Report for Water Year 2020-2021 As shown in Figure 3-3, groundwater levels have increased significantly in the Indio Subbasin from WY 2008-2009 to WY 2020-2021. The 2022 Indio Subbasin Alternative Plan Update uses 2009 water levels as a metric of sustainability because historical low groundwater levels occurred in the years around 2009 throughout most of the Indio Subbasin. The Indio Subbasin shows a long-term positive trend in sustainability resulting from implementation of the Alternative Plan.

Page 426 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1225 of 1306 18 Figure 3-3: 12-Year Change in Groundwater Elevation from Water Year 2008-2009 through Water Year 2020-2021 in the Indio Subbasin
Source: Indio Subbasin Annual Report for Water Year 2020-2021

3.2 Surface Water
IWA does not currently use or intend to use any local surface water as part of its water supply.

Local runoff is captured and used for groundwater recharge.

3.3.1 Stormwater Capture
IWA does not currently use stormwater as a water supply. All stormwater either percolates into the groundwater basin or is conveyed to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel (CVSC).

Stormwater capture may become a potential future supply but is not currently being considered due to the low average volume of water available for capture. As the local flood control authority, CVWD considers delivery of treated stormwater as a potential future potable or non-potable water supply.

3.3 Wastewater and Recycled Water
Wastewater that has been highly treated and disinfected can be reused for landscape irrigation and other purposes. Recycled wastewater has historically been used for irrigation of golf courses and municipal landscaping in the Coachella Valley since as early as the 1960s. As growth occurs

Page 427 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1226 of 1306 19 in the eastern Coachella Valley, the supply of recycled water is expected to increase, creating an additional opportunity to maximize local water supply.

The City of Indio is served by two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs): one is owned by Valley Sanitary District (VSD) and the other by CVWD. The VSD WWTP is located on Van Buren Street in Indio and provides services to 96 percent of the City’s population. Currently, VSD discharges the effluent to the CVSC. The VSD WWTP operates parallel treatment processes: an activated sludge treatment process and a biological treatment pond process. Any effluent that is not reused is discharged to the CVSC which flows directly to the Salton Sea. One of CVWD’s water reclamation plants (WRP-7) treats a small percentage of Indio’s wastewater. WRP-7 is located at Avenue 38 and Madison Street in Indio. WRP-7 is a tertiary treatment facility, and the effluent produced is recycled for non-potable uses for CVWD customers.

Wastewater collection, treatment and discharge in the IWA service area in 2020 is summarized in Table 3-3. IWA’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) projected recycled water uses for 2020 including landscape irrigation (50 AF) and golf course irrigation (960 AF), but none were realized.

Table 3-3: Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Discharge in Indio in 2020

IWA and VSD are collaborating to evaluate a recycled water program to augment the local water supply. IWA and VSD formed the East Valley Reclamation Authority (EVRA) in 2013. EVRA is a Joint Powers Authority created to develop an indirect potable reuse project, to supplement a sustainable water supply. Development of a new recycled water supply would require the addition of tertiary treatment facilities, and potentially advanced treatment, to the VSD WWTP depending on the ultimate use of the recycled water.

IWA completed a 2011 Recycled Water Master Plan and 2016 Recycled Water Feasibility Study to assess potential customers and infrastructure build-out to support recycled water service within the service area. IWA’s 2016 Recycled Water Feasibility Study evaluated a proposed recycled water system. However, due to lack of irrigation customers, a purple pipe system is not feasible. The projected uses of recycled water are shown in Table 3-4.

Wastewater
Treatment
Agency/ Plant
Wastewater
Volume
Collected (AF)
Treatment
Level
Wastewater
Volume
Discharged (AF)
Discharge
Location
Wastewater
Volume
Recycled (AF)
CVWD WRP-7 100 Tertiary 0 N/A 100
Valley SD WWTP 6,261 Secondary 6,261 Stormwater
channel
0 Total 6,361 - 6,261 - 100
Source: Tables 7-14 & 7-15, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan

Page 428 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1227 of 1306 20 Table 3-4: Recycled Water Within IWA Service Area (AF)

3.4 Conservation
Water conservation, and the reduced groundwater production associated with water conservation, benefits the groundwater basin and is an important element of the Alternative Plans and the 2020 Regional UWMP. IWA is a member of CV Water Counts, a non-profit group that includes five other water member agencies in the Coachella Valley to provide a dedicated resource for water conservation and tips that help residents and businesses to reduce water use and costs.

IWA maintains a budget to reimburse residents and business owners for replacing grass with drought-tolerant desert landscaping, and for replacing inefficient irrigation systems, toilets, and washing machines. IWA also provides irrigation guides, leak detection tips, information on reporting water wasters and other education materials. IWA implements budget-tiered water rates to reward efficiency.

3.5 Landscape Ordinance
The City of Indio/IWA mandates efficiency in newly installed landscape irrigation systems via Ordinance No. 1684 (Water Efficient Landscape Development Standards). The ordinance is adopted in substantially the same form as the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG)/CVWD’s regional water efficient landscape ordinance, which is significantly more stringent than the State model ordinance. This ordinance establishes effective water-efficient landscape requirements for newly installed and renovated landscapes. The ordinance also implements the requirements of the State of California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act.

For example, the ordinance requires selection of water-efficient and low-maintenance plant material, grading plan that minimize soil erosion, runoff and water waste, and a minimum irrigation efficiency of 75%.

3.6 Water Shortage Contingency Planning
The 2020 Regional UWMP participating agencies have elected to use the six standard shortage levels included in guidance documents prepared by DWR. IWA’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan provides the shortage levels summarized in Table 3-5. These levels correspond to progressively increasing anticipated reductions in the supplies that would normally be available to IWA. These supply reductions could be the result of a variety of potential causes including natural forces, system component failure or interruption, regulatory actions, contamination, or any combination of factors. IWA may need to activate shortage levels across its entire service Beneficial Use
Type
Treatment
Level
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Groundwater
Recharge
Advanced 0 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Total 0 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

Page 429 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1228 of 1306 21 area or within certain areas that are impacted by an event. The levels involve voluntary and mandatory conservation measures and restrictions, depending on the causes, severity, and anticipated duration of the water supply shortage. IWA benefits from a large groundwater basin providing storage and other local agencies’ groundwater replenishment programs that increase groundwater storage during wet years such that there is available supply during dry years.

Table 3-5: Water Shortage Contingency Plan Shortage Levels Shortage Level Shortage Range Water Supply Condition
1 Up to 10% Normal water supplies
2 Up to 20% Slightly limited water supplies
3 Up to 30% Moderately limited water supplies
4 Up to 40% Limited water supplies
5 Up to 50% Significantly limited water supplies
6 Greater than 50% Severe shortage or catastrophic incident Source: Indio Water Authority Water Shortage Contingency Plan, June 2021.

Page 430 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1229 of 1306 22 4 Public Water System – Projected Supply and Demand
Indio Water Authority (IWA) projects that all of its urban potable water uses will continue to be supplied from local groundwater. In addition to groundwater, IWA plans to implement a joint project with the East Valley Reclamation Authority (EVRA) by 2030 to produce recycled water for groundwater recharge. IWA is involved in developing the feasibility study to evaluate treatment needs and potential locations for recharge basins.

4.1 Projected Urban Demand and Supply
The following tables from the 2020 Regional Urban Water Management Plan (Regional UWMP) provide the IWA’s projected water supplies and demands. Potable water demand projections for the IWA service area are summarized in Table 4-1. These projections were based on the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) 2020 Connect SoCal Regional Transportation Plan, additional analysis of vacancy rates, future estimates of employment, five years of customer billing data, water loss audits, and adjustments for conservation savings.

Table 4-1: IWA Projected Urban Retail Demands
Projected Water Use (acre feet per year, AFY)
Use Type 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Single Family 12,790 13,828 14,822 15,532 16,067
Multi-Family 1,875 1,985 2,135 2,303 2,553
Commercial/Industrial/
Institutional
3,113 3,254 3,397 3,468 3,540
Landscape 5,752 6,171 6,590 6,934 7,277
Other 5 6 6 6 7
Losses 1,257 1,348 1,434 1,495 1,553
Total 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Source: Table 7-8, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

A summary of projected water supply volumes by source is presented in Table 4-2. It should be noted that the supplies and demands presented in the tables below include recycled water planned for groundwater recharge. DWR requires the supply reliability table to include both potable and recycled water; however, IWA’s recycled water is not planned to be a potable water supply nor delivered to IWA’s potable water customers. Instead, recycled water is planned to recharge the groundwater basin to eliminate overdraft.

Table 4-2: IWA Projected Water Supplies
Projected Water Supply (acre feet per year, AFY)
Water Supply 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Total 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Source: Table 7-21, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

Page 431 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1230 of 1306 23 4.2 Normal, Single-Dry, Multiple-Dry Year Comparison The following tables from the 2020 Regional UWMP provide IWA’s projected water supplies and demands in a normal year, single-dry year, and multiple-dry years.

During normal years, IWA will be able to meet future urban water demands projected in the 2020 Regional UWMP through groundwater pumping as shown in Table 4-3. IWA will also be able to meet future recycled water demands during normal years.

Table 4-3: IWA Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Supply Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Demand Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Potable and Raw Water Demand 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997 Recycled Water Demand 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Difference 0 0 0 0 0
Source: Table 7-24, 2020 Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

Note: The Regional UWMP participating agencies collaborate on groundwater management plans for long-term sustainability. During a normal year, single-dry year, or five-dry year period, the agencies could produce additional groundwater if demands exceeded the estimates shown here.

During single-dry years, IWA will be able to meet future urban water demands through groundwater pumping as shown in Table 4-4. IWA will also be able to meet future recycled water demands during single-dry years. Water supplies during a single-dry year are 100 percentreliable.

The Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin is un-adjudicated and has sufficient storage to meet the projected pumping conditions on the basin for the next 25 years, and beyond. Thus, issues related to reliability of supply and vulnerability to seasonal and climatic changes do not significantly affect the reliability of the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin. The supplies are limited only by available IWA pumping capacity, and any additional supply needed will be pumped from the groundwater basin. IWA and other local agencies including Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) will continue to replenish the groundwater basin with imported and recycled water.

Thus, the supply and demand comparison for the single-dry year is the same as the normal year.

Page 432 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1231 of 1306 24 Table 4-4: IWA Single-Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Supply Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Demand Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Potable and Raw Water Demand 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997 Recycled Water Demand 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Difference 0 0 0 0 0
Source: Table 7-25, 2020 Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

During multiple-dry years, IWA will be able to meet future urban water demands through groundwater pumping as shown in Table 4-5. IWA will also be able to meet future recycled water demands during multiple-dry years. Any additional supply needed will be pumped from the groundwater basin. Similar to the single-dry year, the multiple-dry year water supply reliability is 100 percent. Thus, the supply and demand comparison for the multiple-dry years is the same as the normal year. IWA and the other Regional UWMP agencies collaborate on groundwater management plans for long-term sustainability. During a normal year, single-dry year, or five-dry year period, the agencies could produce additional groundwater if demands exceeded the estimates shown here.

Historically, the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin has shown signs of overdraft, which could impact reliability in the very long term. As described in the Regional UWMP, local water agencies including CVWD continue to implement groundwater management to ensure groundwater levels are maintained and mitigate potential overdraft conditions of the basin. IWA also continues to develop and expand an Urban Water Use Efficiency and Conservation Program to implement Demand Management Measures and other conservation programs to decrease the annual volume of water consumed.

Page 433 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1232 of 1306 25 Table 4-5: IWA Multiple-Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
First
Year
Supply Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Demand Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Potable and Raw Water Demand 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997 Recycled Water Demand 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Difference 0 0 0 0 0
Second
Year
Supply Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Demand Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Potable and Raw Water Demand 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997 Recycled Water Demand 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Difference 0 0 0 0 0
Third
Year
Supply Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Demand Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Potable and Raw Water Demand 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997 Recycled Water Demand 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Difference 0 0 0 0 0
Fourth
Year
Supply Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Demand Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Potable and Raw Water Demand 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997 Recycled Water Demand 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Difference 0 0 0 0 0
Fifth
Year
Supply Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Groundwater 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997
Recycled Water 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Demand Totals (AFY) 24,792 31,592 33,384 34,738 35,997
Potable and Raw Water Demand 24,792 26,592 28,384 29,738 30,997 Recycled Water Demand 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Difference 0 0 0 0 0
Source: Table 7-26, 2020 Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

Page 434 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1233 of 1306 26 IWA’s total current urban water demand was 19,880 acre-feet (AF) for 2020, which was supplied with 100% groundwater. This was lower than the potable and raw water demand (25,810 AF) projected in IWA’s 2015 UWMP, which is likely due to IWA’s current water conservation efforts not accounted for in the 2015 UWMP projections. The actual demand in 2020 is consistent with the projection in the 2015 UWMP that IWA’s conservation efforts could reduce overall water demand by at least 20 percent by 2020.

Page 435 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1234 of 1306 27 5 Project Description
The Calhoun Specific Plan (Project) islocated in the eastern portion of the Coachella Valley within the City of Indio, Riverside County as shown in Figure 5-1: Project Regional Location Map. The Project will be accessible from Avenue 43 and Calhoun Street, and is bounded by Avenue 43 to the north, single-family residential to the east, the I-10 Freeway and single-family residential to the south, and I-10 Freeway to the west, as shown in Figure 5-2: Project Vicinity Map. The Project proposes to develop approximately 60 acres of vacant land in the Coachella Valley to include up to 1,200 single- and multi-family residential dwelling units as shown in Figure 5-3: Planning Area Map.

The subject site is designated as Connected Neighborhood and zoned as Connected Neighborhood-14 and -20 (CN-14 and CN -20) in the City’s General Plan Update Land Use and Zoning Update Maps, respectively. The designations allow for a mix of single-family as well as small to medium multi-family buildings at a density of 14 to 20 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC).

Under the proposed Specific Plan, the total Project area will have an average density of 20 DU/AC and thus complies with the maximum DU/AC designated in the City’s General Plan.

Figure 5-1: Project Regional Location Map

Page 436 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1235 of 1306 28 Figure 5-2: Project Vicinity Map
Figure 5-3: Project Site Plan

Page 437 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1236 of 1306 29 6 Project Water Demands
The Calhoun Specific Plan (Project) proposes to develop approximately 60 acres of vacant land in the Coachella Valley to include up to 1,200 single-family and multi-family dwelling units. Future housing developments may include common recreation facilities such as pools, spas, club houses, management offices, barbecues, and other facilities. Project-level landscape plans are currently unknown, however it is assumed that up to 30 percent of the total site area, or 18 acres, may be landscaped with a mix of drought tolerant landscaping and minimal turf for open space, retention basins, and paseos.

As shown in Tables 6-1 and 6-2, the total projected water demand for the Project is 287.79 AFY, or 4.8 acre-feet per acre.

6.1 Projected Indoor Residential Water Demand
The projected indoor residential unit usage for this Water Supply Assessment (WSA) is based on indoor water use performance standards as provided in the California Water Code (CWC) for residential water demand Water Code Section 10910 approved November 10, 2009, codified in CWC section 10608.20 (b)(2)(A). The projected indoor residential water demand for the Project totals 224.75 acre-feet per year (AFY) as shown in Table 6-1 below.

Table 6-1: Projected Indoor Residential Water Demand
Land Area
(Acres)
Estimated
Dwelling
Units (EDUs)
Estimated
Occupants
per Home 1
Gallons per
Day (gpd) per
Occupant 2
gpd/EDU
Water
Demand
(gpd)
Water
Demand
(AFY)
60 1,200 3.04 55 167.2 200,640 224.75
1 CA Department of Finance Table 2: E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 2022 for the City of Indio 2 CA Indoor Water Use Performance Standard

6.2 Projected Outdoor Irrigation Water Demand
The projected outdoor irrigation water usage is based on the Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) equation, from Indio’s Water Efficient Landscape Development Standards (Ordinance 1684) which meets the water conservation goals of the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Model Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). The projected outdoor irrigation water demand for the Project is 63.04 AFY as shown in Table 6-2 below.

Table 6-2: Projected Outdoor Irrigation Water Demand
Landscaped Area
(ft2)
ETo
(in/yr) 1 ETAF 2 Conversion Factor (gal/ft2) 3
Water Demand
(gpd)
Water Demand
(AFY)
784,080 93.9 0.45 0.62 56,277.83 63.04
1 Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) for ETo Zone 5 from Indio’s Landscape Ordinance 1684. 2 Evapotranspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF) from Indio’s Landscape Ordinance 1684. 3 Conversion Factor from Indio’s Landscape Ordinance 1684.

Page 438 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1237 of 1306 30 7 Assessment– Availability of Sufficient Supplies
Based on the analysis in this Water Supply Assessment (WSA), the projected total water demand for the Calhoun Specific Plan (Project) will be 287.79 AFY, or 4.8 acre-feet per acre. IWA’s longterm water management planning ensures that adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water needs within its service area. The Proposed Project is consistent with the land use designation assigned to it in the General Plan, on which, in part, the IWA based its future water demand analysis when preparing its planning documents, including its Urban Water Management Plan. IWA’s current urban water demand was 19,880 acre-feet (AF) for 2020, and the projected urban water demand by 2045 is 30,997 AF. This Project’s water demand of 287.79 AFY accounts for approximately 2.6 percent of the total planned increases in demand of 11,117 AF by 2045.

This WSA provides an assessment of the availability of sufficient water supplies during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years over a 20-year projection to meet the projected demands of the Project, in addition to existing and planned future water demands of IWA, as required by Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), SB 221, and SB 1262. This WSA also includes identification of existing water supply entitlements, water rights, water service contracts, and agreements relevant to the identified water supply for the Project and quantities of water received in prior years pursuant to those entitlements, rights, contracts, and agreements.

This WSA has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of SB 610, SB 221, and SB 1262 by Terra Nova Planning & Research, Inc. in consultation with IWA and the City of Indio. This WSA does not relieve the Project from complying with all applicable state, county, city, and local ordinances or regulations including the City of Indio Landscape Ordinance (Ordinance 1684), and indoor water use performance standards provided in the CWC.

This WSA will be reviewed every five years, or in the event that the water planning assumptions have changed, until the Project completes construction to ensure it remains accurate and no significant changes to either the Project or available water supply has occurred. The Project applicant shall notify IWA when construction begins. If neither the Project applicant nor the Lead Agency contacts IWA within five years of approval of this WSA, it will be assumed that the Project no longer exists and the WSA provided by this document will become invalid.

Page 439 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1238 of 1306 31 8 References
American Water Works Association Research Foundation, Commercial and Institutional End Uses of Water, 2000
California Department of Water Resources, Final State Water Project Delivery Capability Report 2019, August 2020
City of Indio, Ordinance 1684, January 2016
Coachella Valley Water District, Coachella Water Authority, Desert Water Agency, Indio Water Authority, Mission Springs Water District, Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company, 2020 Coachella Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan, Water Systems Consulting, Inc., June 2021
Coachella Valley Water District, Coachella Water Authority, Desert Water Agency, and Indio Water Authority, Indio Subbasin Annual Report for Water Year 2020-2021, Todd Groundwater Inc., February 2022
Coachella Valley Water District, Coachella Water Authority, Desert Water Agency, and Indio Water Authority, 2022 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update/Alternative Plan Update, Todd Groundwater Inc., December 2021
Indio Water Authority, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, MWH, July 2016

Page 440 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1239 of 1306 RESOLUTION NO. 2066

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF INDIO, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE PLANNING REVIEW (DR 22-11- 514) FOR PHASE AREA 1 OF THE CALHOUN AND AVENUE 43 SPECIFIC PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT OF 340 RESIDENTIAL UNITS CONSISTING OF 195 GARDEN-STYLE ATTACHED AND DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS AND 145 TOWNHOMES, ASSOCIATED COMMUNITY AMENITIES, AND IMPROVEMENTS ALONG CALHOUN STREET AND AVENUE 43 (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 692-060-023, 692-060-006, 692-060-007, AND 692-060-008) WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, applicant Andrea Sepulveda, submitted an application for a Specific Plan and Planning Review with associated environmental documentation on behalf of CRERMG CALHOUN 29, LLC, proposing the development of 1,200 build-to-rent residential units with community pools, gyms, clubhouses, and open space common areas; and,
WHEREAS, the Calhoun and Ave 43 Specific Plan project would be developed on approximately 60 acres in two communities on the west and east sides of Calhoun Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 692-060-023, 692-060-006, 692-060-007, and 692-060- 008); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Review will encompass the eastern half of the site, allowing 340 units, including single-family attached and detached units and townhomes; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and CEQA Guidelines Section § 15070 (Decision to Prepare a Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration), a public agency shall prepare or have prepared a proposed negative declaration or a mitigated negative declaration for a project subject to CEQA when the initial study identifies potentially significant impacts but revisions in the project plan or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section § 15070 (Decision to Prepare a Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration), an initial study with mitigated negative declaration was prepared for the Proposed Project (“Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration), and mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Mitigated Negative Declaration and will be imposed on the Proposed Project through the City’s adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 1507(d); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section § 15073 (Public Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration), the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public review from February 2, 2023, to February 23, 2023; and,

Page 441 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1240 of 1306 WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section § 15073 (Public Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration), comments were received pertaining to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and added to the administrative record; and,

WHEREAS, a notice of a public hearing to consider the Specific Plan, Planning Review, and Environmental Assessment (Case File No. 22-11-514) was issued in accordance with Section 6.03.08 of the Indio Municipal Code and Public Resources Code Section 21092, inclusive of the publication on August 10, 2023, of a legal public hearing notice which was published in the Desert Sun, the City’s newspaper of record and mailing of a public hearing notice to a certified list of property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject properties on August 8, 2023; and,
WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended the conditional approval for this Resolution for the Planning Review (Case File No. 22-11-514) for the Calhoun and Avenue 43 Specific Plan Project with the motion vote outcome specified in the meeting minutes for the August 23, 2023, Planning Commission meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSIONS OF THE CITY OF INDIO, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES, FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the recitals of this Resolution are true and correct, are incorporated into the following findings by reference, and constitute a material part of this Resolution.

Section 2. Planning Review Findings. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, including the staff report and written and verbal testimony, the Planning Commission hereby finds:
a. The Proposed Project is consistent with General Plan policies and the Calhoun and Avenue 43 Specific Plan in that the Site is located within the Connected Neighborhood land use designation and proposed single-family and multi-family residential units and tenant amenities are permitted uses under the Calhoun and Avenue 43 Specific Plan.
b. The Proposed Project is consistent with applicable objective development standards and design standards and/or design guidelines adopted by the City Council in that the proposed uses will comply with each of the applicable provisions within the Indio Unified Development Code and will not require variances or conditional use permits.
c. The Proposed Project design is appropriate to the function of the Proposed Project and will provide attractive and comfortable environment for occupants, visitors, and the general community in that the overall design of the Proposed

Page 442 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1241 of 1306 Project complies with the Specific Plan’s objective design criteria and will enhance the surrounding natural environment.
d. Structures within the development and between the structures and the Site relate to one another. The proposed structures and related site development improvements (e.g., access, parking, grading, etc.) comply with objective standards in the Calhoun and Avenue 43 Specific Plan, and thereby relate and connect to existing development in the vicinity, promote efficient circulation, encourage a range of transportation modes by providing safe and convenient routes for pedestrians and cyclists, and incorporate necessary utilities and service areas (e.g., refuse and recycling enclosures) such that they are compatible with the overall design of the project and minimize visual impacts. e. The Proposed Project complies with all of the Specific Plan’s objective standards that ensure that buildings are designed to mediate scale, massing, and bulk, reflect a human scale design, and enhance the pedestrian experience through building modulation and facade articulation treatments. f. The Proposed Project complies with all of the Specific Plan’s objective standards related to design of streetscapes, including street trees, lighting, and pedestrian furniture, thereby ensuring consistency with the intended character of the area.
g. Parking areas are designed and developed to provide adequate parking, buffer surrounding land uses, compliment pedestrian-oriented development, enhance the environmental quality of the site (e.g., by minimizing stormwater run-off and the heat-island effect), and achieve a safe, efficient, and harmonious development.
h. The Proposed Project complies with the Specific Plan’s objective standards for fences, walls, and other visual screening elements so that community members can differentiate between public and private property.
i. The Proposed Project complies with all of the Specific Plan’s objective standards for lighting and lighting fixtures, providing adequate light over walkways and parking areas to create a sense of pedestrian safety and avoiding glare.
j. The Proposed Project complies with all of the Specific Plan’s objective standards for landscaping, and is therefore designed to be compatible with and enhance the architectural character and features of the buildings on site, conserve water, provide buffers or screening, and help relate the building to the surrounding landscape.
k. The Proposed Project complies with all of the Specific Plan’s objective standards and the project details, materials, signage, and landscaping, are

Page 443 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1242 of 1306 internally consistent, fully integrated with one another, and used in a manner that is visually consistent with the proposed architectural design. l. The Proposed Project will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the development site, or to the public health, safety or general welfare.

Section 3. Recommendation. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby CONDITIONALLY APPROVES the Planning Review for the Calhoun and Avenue 43 Specific Plan Plan Area – 1 (DR 22-11-514), subject to the conditions of approval contained herein. The Applicant shall demonstrate compliance to ALL conditions of approval, listed in the Resolution. Failure to demonstrate compliance to these conditions of approval may result in the delay of the proposed use or the rescinding of the City of Indio’s project approval. Where the term “Applicant” is used in any condition of approval, this term shall apply also to the Property owner, any developer, or any successor in the interest of the Applicant. It is the Applicant’s or Applicant’s successor in interest responsibility to fully comply with the conditions of approval unless subsequently modified in accordance with the City’s required processes and procedures:

General Conditions of Approval:

The Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance to the following conditions of approval:

1. IID will not begin any studies, engineering or estimate costs to provide electrical service to the development project until the applicant submits a customer project application (available at http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=12923 and detailed loading information, panel sizes, project schedule and estimated inservice date. Applicant shall bear all costs, associated with providing electrical service to the project, including but not limited to the construction of distribution backbone circuit and overhead and underground line extensions and underground conduit systems, in addition to the reconfiguration and upgrades necessary to extend electrical service to the proposed project, as well as applicable permits, zoning changes, landscaping (if required by the City or County) and rights-of-way and easements.

2. However, based on the preliminary information provided to IID, the district can accommodate the power requirements of the project by extending a new distribution backbone circuit (conduit and cable) from the existing Shadow Hills substation to the project.

3. The district’s ability to provide service from existing infrastructure is based on current available capacity, which may be impacted by future development in the area.

Page 444 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1243 of 1306

4. It is important to note that a detailed and final study will be developed once a customer project application and loading calculations are received. This detailed information will allow IID to perform an accurate assessment and provide a full report of any potential impacts and mitigation measures. The conditions of service could change as a result of the additional studies.

5. Underground infrastructure that includes trenching, conduits, pull boxes, switch boxes and pads should be installed following IID approved plans. Physical Field installation of underground infrastructures should be verified and approved by an IID inspector prior to cable installation as per IID Developer’s Guide (available at the district website https://www.iid.com/home/showdocumetn?id=14229)

6. Line extensions to serve the project will be made in accordance with IID Regulations:

No. 2 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2540)
No. 13 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2553),
No. 15 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2555),
No. 20 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2560) and No. 23 (https://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=17897).

7. For additional information regarding electrical service for the project, the applicant should be advised to contact the IID Energy - La Quinta Division Customer Operations, 81-600 Avenue 58 La Quinta, CA 92253, at (760) 398-5841 and speak with the project development planner assigned to the area.

8. It is important to note that IID's policy is to extend its electrical facilities only to those project that have obtained the approval of a city or county planning commission and such other governmental authority or decision-making body having jurisdiction over said developments.

9. The applicant will be required to provide rights-of-way and easements for powerline extensions and/or any other infrastructure needed to serve the project.

10. Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the IID encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion are available at https://www.iid.com/aboutiid/departmentdirectory/real-estate. The IID Real Estate Section should be contacted

Page 445 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1244 of 1306 at (760) 339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements.

11. Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the project (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines, ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service; the acquisition and dedication of real property, rights of way and/or easements for the siting and construction of electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines and ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service, etc.) need to be included as part of the project's California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Any mitigation necessary as a result of the construction, relocation and/or upgrade of IID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent.

12. Applicant should be advised that landscaping can be dangerous if items are planted too close to IIO's electrical equipment. In the event of an outage, or equipment failure, it is vital that IID personnel have immediate and safe access to its equipment to make the needed repairs. For public safety, and that of the electrical workers, it is important to adhere to standards that limit landscaping around electrical facilities. IID landscaping guidelines are available at https://www.iid.com/energy/vegetationmanagement.

13.Fire Hydrants and Fire Flow: Provide one copy of the water system plans to show there exist fire hydrant(s) capable of delivering the minimum fire flow required per CFC Appendix B Table 105.1, within 400 feet to all portions around the proposed structure. Minimum fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with CFC and NFPA 14.

14.If Fire Hydrants are required to be installed, applicant/developer shall furnish two copies of the water system fire hydrant plans directly to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. Plans shall be signed by a registered Civil Engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum Fire Flow. Once plans are signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for review and Approval.

15.Fire Department Access: Provide a Site Plan for Fire Apparatus Access Roads and Signage. Access roads shall be provided to within 207 feet to all portions of all buildings and shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet. The construction of the Access Roads shall all weather surface and capable of sustaining 60,000 pounds over two axels for commercial developments per CFC 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended by the City of Indio.

Page 446 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1245 of 1306

16.Phased Construction Access: If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access for fire protection prior to any construction (CFC 503.1)

17.Requests for installation of Traffic Calming designs/devices on Fire Apparatus Access Roads are prohibited unless submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal.

18.Construction Permits Fire Department Review: Submittal of construction plans to the Office of the Fire Marshal for development, construction, installation and operation use permitting will be required. Final Fire and Life Safety conditions will be addressed when the plans are reviewed. These conditions will be based on the occupancy, use, CBC, CFC, and all other related codes which are in effect at the time of building plan submittal.

19.Fire Sprinkler System: All structures 3,600 sq ft or larger will be required to install a Fire Sprinkler System CFC 903.2 and NFPA 13 as amended by City of Indio.

20.Fire Sprinkler System: All Residential structures will be required to install a Fire Sprinkler System per NFPA 13D and or NFPA 13R.

21.Fire Alarm and Detection System: A waterflow monitoring system and/or Fire Alarm system will be required per CFC 903.4, 907.2 and NFPA 72.

22.Knox Box and Gate Access: Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box. The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. All electronically operated gates shall be provided with a Knox Key Switch and automatic sensors for access. CFC 506.1.

23.Addressing: All commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and additional locations as required CFC 505.1 and Riverside County Fire Department Standard #07-01.

24. Shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as applicable:

• California Building Code
• California Residential Code
• California Electrical Code
• California Mechanical Code
• California Plumbing Code
• California Energy Code
• California Fire Code
• California Green Building Standards Code

25. Automatic fire suppression systems shall be installed in all new construction per Title IX, Chapter 93 of the Code of the City of Indio. Design and type of system

Page 447 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1246 of 1306 shall be based upon the requirements of the Building Code, Fire Code and the requirements of the Riverside County Fire Department.

26. The requirements of the Air Quality Management District shall be satisfied prior to the issuance of any permit if dusts and/or pollutants will be discharged into the atmosphere.

27. Any temporary building, trailer, commercial coach, etc. installed and/or used in connection with a construction project shall comply with City Code.

28. All perimeter/boundary walls shall be designed and constructed so that the outer/exterior face of the wall is as close as possible to the lot line. In any case, the outer/exterior face of the wall shall be within two (2) inches of the lot line.

Distances greater than two (2) inches may be approved prior to construction by the Building Official on a case-by-case basis for extenuating circumstances.

29. All lot lines, easement lines, etc. shall be located and/or relocated in such a manner as to not cause any existing structure to become non-conforming with the requirements of the latest adopted edition of the Building Code, or any other applicable law, ordinance, or code.

30. All signs shall be Underwriters Laboratories approved, or equal.

31. All exterior lighting shall be oriented, directed, and/or shielded as much as possible so that direct illumination does not infringe onto adjoining properties.

32. On-site and Off-site water improvement plans are required.

33. Off-site improvements require the installation of a 12-inch ductile iron pipeline (DIP) along avenue 43 and loop connection to IWA system on the south side of the proposed development.

34. The project may provide water metering in one of two ways: either each building unit will require its own domestic water meter, or a master meter with or without private sub-meter systems may be installed

35. IWA requires a separate water meter with back flow assembly for landscape irrigation.

36. All new meter boxes shall be polymer with a 2” radio read port per IWA standards.

37. The applicant shall coordinate fire service with Indio Fire Department.

38. IWA requires an Advanced Meter Infrastructure (AMI) pole for this development.

39. The applicant shall complete the Landscape Documentation Package in accordance with the Water Efficient Landscape Development Standards Ordinance No. 1684.

Page 448 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1247 of 1306

40. Developer shall pay all applicable fees; submit forms and agreements per IWA development procedural guidelines for final plan approval.

41. Pedestrian walkways to bus stops should be designed to meet the needs of all passengers, including the disabled, seniors and children. All pedestrian walkways should be designed to be direct from the street network to the main entrance of buildings.

42. A vertical clearance of 84 inches (preferable 96 inches) should also be maintained along the pathway.

Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit:

The Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance with the following conditions of approval:

1. The following items (as applicable) shall be completed and/or submitted to Building & Safety prior to the issuance of building permits for this project:

A. Precise grading plans shall be approved by Engineering/Public Works B. Rough grading completed and approved by Engineering/Public Works C. Compaction certification
D. Pad elevation certification
E. Rough grade inspection signed off by a City Engineering/Public Works Inspector

2. If hazardous substances are used and/or stored, a technical opinion and report, identifying and developing methods of protection from the hazards presented by the hazardous materials, may be required. This report shall be prepared by a qualified person, firm, or corporation and submitted to Building & Safety. This report shall also explain the proposed facility's intended methods of operation and list all of the proposed materials, their quantities, classifications, and the effects of any chemical (material) intermixing in the event of an accident or spill.

3. The existing parcels shall be combined into a single parcel, or a lot line adjustment shall be done so that the proposed structure(s) does not cross any lot line and complies with all requirements of the California Building Code, prior to any building permits being issued.

Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit:

The Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance with the following conditions of approval:

1. Applicant shall comply with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements per state regulations, contact information is as follows:

Page 449 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1248 of 1306 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Colorado River Basin Region,
73-720 Fred Waring Drive #100
Palm Desert, CA 92260
(760) 346-7491
www.waterboards.ca.gov/coloradoriver
*Please note: Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, a copy of the NOI (Notice of Intent) and the WDID# (Waste Discharge Identification No.), shall be filed with the City of Indio’s Engineering Division.

2. Applicant shall submit PM10 (Dust Control) implementation plans for City approval. Also to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for grading projects greater than 10 acres in size. For further information contact the:

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
21865 Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(800) CUT-SMOG (288-7664)

3. Applicant shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan for City approval prior to the issuance of any grading permit.

4. Applicant shall submit for City approval the following items:
a. Precise grading plans – shall include the street address for each lot and building foot print
b. Rough grading plans
c. Soils report
d. Hydrology Report

5. Retaining walls shall be required at elevational differences greater than 12 inches between lots throughout the project and in relation to adjacent boundary properties (if applicable) unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

6. Applicant shall use Riverside County Flood Control District standards and submit local on-site and regional hydrology, hydraulic storm calculations for City review and approval.

7. Applicant shall provide on-site stormwater retention basin(s) or underground system(s) designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Each retention basin shall include a sufficient number of underground vertical drywells, Maxwell Plus or equivalent, designed to eliminate standing water in the basin. The retention basin(s) or underground system(s) shall be sized to retain all post-development storm water runoff within the limits of the project based on a 100-year storm event of 24-hour duration and shall completely drain/percolate any storm event within 72 hours. All upstream runoff from adjacent

Page 450 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1249 of 1306 properties that has historically been directed onto the proposed project may be considered to pass through the project with the exception of historical retention that occurred on-site. The retention basins shall be designed per Standard Plan No. 130, with a maximum depth of 5 feet (with a one foot minimum freeboard) and maximum side slopes of 3:1 and shall not be used for purposes other than for the collection of storm water, nuisance water and well blow-off water.

8. The design of the project lot pads, street improvements and the storm drainage improvements shall be design coordinated with all adjacent projects or properties to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

9. All grading and pad elevations will be subject to approval of the Community Development Director and the City Engineer based on grading plans and additional information to be submitted during plan check.

Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy:

Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall demonstrate full compliance with the following conditions of approval.

10.Applicant shall:
a. Dispose of all concrete and asphalt removals from the proposed project to an approved recyclable site.
b. Applicant shall provide City of Indio Public Works Department with a copy of receipt showing tonnage for the disposal of recyclable concrete and asphalt. c. Dispose of all material removals from the proposed project to an approved disposal site.

11.Applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans for City approval.

12.Applicant shall submit for City approval the following items:
a. Street improvement plans
b. Streetlight plans
c. Signage and Striping plans

13.Applicant shall construct full off-site street improvements on the following streets:
a. Calhoun Street, east half street improvements along the property frontage, plus 14 feet of pavement on the west side.
b. Avenue 43, south half street improvements along the property frontage.

14.The improvements shall include construction of asphalt concrete pavement, curb/gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, storm drain system (catch basins, storm drainpipe, etc.), and fully landscaped and irrigated parkways along the property frontage.

Page 451 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1250 of 1306

15.Applicant shall grind and overlay the south side of Avenue 43 to the minimum depth of 20 inches along the property frontage.

16.Avenue 43 and Calhoun Street shall be constructed as a 2-lane collector with a striped median, 70 feet from property line to property line and 46 feet from curb to curb.

17.All off-site street improvements including energizing of streetlights and installation of irrigation and landscaping along:
a. Calhoun Street & Avenue 43 shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of a temporary or permanent certificate of occupancy.

18. Dedicate the required right-of-way along: Calhoun Street and Avenue 43 per City of Indio General Plan Mobility Element Requirements.

19. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit prior to starting any street improvements within public right-of-way.

20. All street knuckles shall be per City of Indio Standard Plan No. 142, and street cul-de-sacs per City of Indio Standard Plan No. 140.

21. Applicant shall install End of Roadway at the south end of Calhoun Street per City of Indio Standard Plan No. 173

22. The proposed entrances located off of Avenue 43 shall havea minimum stacking room for five vehicles with acceptable turn around.

23. The minimum grade on all proposed streets shall be 0.50%.

24. The corner cutback at the intersections of Calhoun Street and Avenue 43 shall be per City of Indio standard plan No. 143.

25. The minimum curb return radius for public streets shall be:
a. R = 35 feet and for
b. Private streets R=20 feet

26. The minimum street width for proposed private aisles shall be 24 feet and shall be in compliance with the Fire Department.

Page 452 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1251 of 1306

27. Applicant shall remove and replace any damaged or broken curb/gutter, sidewalk, and asphalt on Avenue 43 along the project property frontage.

28. The proposed project shall comply with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.

29. Street addresses shall be shown on Precise Grading Plans.

30. All improvements shall comply with City standards, requirements, and policies. Applicant is required to construct all transition and missing links between existing and proposed improvements.

31. All overhead utilities less than 92kv, located within the project boundaries, bordering the project and/or fronting the project shall be undergrounded.

32. The proposed access from Calhoun Street closest to Avenue 43 shall be for restricted right turns in and right turns out only.

33.Prior to water service activation, all water infrastructure in the final approved plans must be constructed and must have a Council-approved Water Agreement and Easement if applicable.

34.Prior to the issuance of a landscape water meter, the applicant must have a complete set of landscape plans signed and approved by the IWA.

35.Applicant shall construct all mitigation measures identified in the traffic study for the proposed project.

Section 4. The Planning Commission Secretary shall certify the passage, approval, and adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 23rd day of August 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

JACQUELINE LOPEZ

PLANNING COMMISSIONE R

Page 453 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1252 of 1306 ATTEST:

JESSICA BELMAN

COMMISSION SECRETARY

Page 454 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1253 of 1306 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2070

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF INDIO,

CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT (CASE FILE NO. 22-11-514) FOR THE CALHOUN AND AVENUE 43 SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND FOR 1,200 BUILD-TO-RENT

RESIDENTIAL HOMES, RECREATIONAL AMENITIES, AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ON APPROXIMATELY 60 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ALONG CALHOUN STREET AND AVENUE 43 (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 692-060- 023, 692-060-006, 692-060-007, AND 692-060-008) AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15074
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, applicant Andrea Sepulveda, submitted an application for a Specific Plan and Planning Review with associated environmental documentation on behalf of CRERMG CALHOUN 29, LLC, proposing the development of 1,200 build-to-rent residential units with community pools, gyms, clubhouses, and open space common areas; and,
WHEREAS, the Calhoun and Ave 43 Specific Plan project would be developed on approximately 60 acres in two communities on the west and east sides of Calhoun Street (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 692-060-023, 692-060-006, 692-060-007, and 692-060- 008); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Review will encompass the eastern half of the site, allowing 340 units, including single-family attached and detached units and townhomes; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and CEQA Guidelines Section § 15070 (Decision to Prepare a Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration), a public agency shall prepare or have prepared a proposed negative declaration or a mitigated negative declaration for a project subject to CEQA when the initial study identifies potentially significant impacts but revisions in the project plan or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section § 15070 (Decision to Prepare a Negative or Mitigated Negative Declaration), an initial study with mitigated negative declaration was prepared for the Proposed Project (“Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration), and mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Mitigated Negative Declaration and will be imposed on the Proposed Project through the City’s adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 1507(d); and,

Page 455 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1254 of 1306 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section § 15073 (Public Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration), the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public review from February 2, 2023, to February 23, 2023; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section § 15073 (Public Review of a Proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration), comments were received pertaining to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and added to the administrative record; and,
WHEREAS, a notice of a public hearing to consider the Specific Plan, Planning Review, and Environmental Assessment (Case File No. 22-11-514) was issued in accordance with Section 6.03.08 of the Indio Municipal Code and Public Resources Code Section 21092, inclusive of the publication on August 10, 2023, of a legal public hearing notice which was published in the Desert Sun, the City’s newspaper of record and mailing of a public hearing notice to a certified list of property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject properties on August 8, 2023; and,
WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended the conditional approval for this Resolution for the Planning Review (Case File No. 22-11-514) for the Calhoun and Avenue 43 Specific Plan Project with the motion vote outcome specified in the meeting minutes for the August 23, 2023, Planning Commission meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF INDIO, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND RESOLVESAS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the recitals of this Resolution are true and correct, and are incorporated into the following findings by reference, and constitute a material part of this Resolution.

SECTION 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the administrative record for the Proposed Project, including all oral and written comments received during the public hearing, the staff report, and all attachments thereto, which are all incorporated herein by reference and are on file at the Community Development Department for the City of Indio, and the Planning Commission finds that:
a. The Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration (Case File No. 22-11- 514) has been completed in compliance with CEQA and reflects the agency's independent judgment and analysis.
b. All environmental impacts of the Proposed Project are either insignificant or can be mitigated to a level of insignificance pursuant to the mitigation measures

Page 456 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1255 of 1306 3 outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program.
c. There is no substantial evidence in the administrative record supporting a fair argument that the Proposed Project, as revised, may result in significant environmental impacts.
d. The Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration (Case File No. 22-11-514) pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080(c)(2).
e. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the Planning Commission approves and adopts the MMRP prepared for the Project, which shall be fully complied with as specified in this Resolution and the Conditions of Approval set forth herein.

SECTION 3. Recommendation. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby RECOMMENDS THE APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL of the Calhoun and Avenue 43 Specific Plan (DR 22-11-514), subject to the conditions of approval contained herein. The Applicant shall demonstrate compliance to ALL conditions of approval, listed in the Resolution. Failure to demonstrate compliance to these conditions of approval may result in the delay of the proposed use or the rescinding of the City of Indio’s project approval. Where the term “Applicant” is used in any condition of approval, this term shall apply also to the Property owner, any developer, or any successor in the interest of the Applicant. It is the Applicant’s or Applicant’s successor in interest responsibility to fully comply with the conditions of approval unless subsequently modified in accordance with the City’s required processes and procedures.

SECTION 4. The Planning Commission Secretary shall certify to the passage, approval, and adoption of this Resolution.

Page 457 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1256 of 1306 4 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 23rd day of August 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

JACQUELINE LOPEZ

PLANNING COMMISSIONER
ATTEST:

JESSICA BELMAN

COMMISSION SECRETARY

Page 458 of 458 ends

Resolution No. 10391, requesting the approval of the Calhoun and Ave 43 ... Page 1257 of 1306 City of Indio
City Council
September 18, 2023

STAFF REPORT
To: City Council
From: Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager
Prepared by: Kevin H. Snyder, Dir. Of Community Development Subject: Resolution No. 10390 of the City Council of the City of Indio conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473 (TPM 22-05-469) for the Desert Retreat by Pulte Homes Project creating 5 parcels of land located along Avenue 38, Avenue 39, Avenue 40, Jefferson Street, and Madison Street and finding it is consistent with the Desert Retreat Final Environmental Impact Report RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Resolution No. 10390 of the City Council of the City of Indio conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473 (TPM 22-05-469) for the Desert Retreat by Pulte Homes Project creating 5 parcels of land located along Avenue 38, Avenue 39, Avenue 40, Jefferson Street, and Madison Street and finding it is consistent with the Desert Retreat Final Environmental Impact Report.

SUMMARY:

On May 27, 2022, applicant David Dewegeli, submitted an application for Tentative Parcel Map 38473 for the Desert Retreat by Pulte Homes project. The Tentative Parcel Map would subdivide into parcels of land Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 691-110-002, 003, 004, 008, 011, 014, 021, 023, 025. These parcels are located in North Indio along Avenue 38, Avenue 39, Avenue 40, Jefferson Street, and Madison Street and compose approximately 378 acres of land. The Tentative Parcel Map is for financial purposes.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

On July 26, 2023, the Planning Commission recommended Resolution No. 2063 for the Desert Retreat Specific Plan, Resolution No. 2064 for the Desert Retreat Tentative Tract Map, and Resolution No. 2067 for the Desert Retreat Final Environmental Impact Report for approval to the City Council. On August 16, 2023, the City Council conditionally approved Resolution No.10386 for the Desert Retreat Specific Plan, Resolution No. 10387 for the Desert Retreat Tentative Tract Map, and Resolution No. 10388 for the Desert Retreat Final Environmental Impact Report. On August 9, 2023, the Planning Commission recommended Resolution No. 2068 for Tentative Parcel Map 38473 for approval to the City Council.

The approved Specific Plan is the land use regulatory document for the development of a residential community on approximately 378 acres. It will allow for the construction of up to 1,500 single-family homes at an average density of 4.1 dwelling units per acre (“du/ac”). The project would include a community clubhouse in the center of the project to include outdoor resident amenities such as pickle ball courts, bocce ball courts, tennis courts, and water features. The 1,500 single-family homes would AGENDA ITEM #10.2
Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1258 of 1306 be constructed on approximately 351.6 acres, while the clubhouse and recreation amenities will be constructed on approximately 26.1 acres.

Access to the property will be taken from three newly proposed drives [from/off of] Avenue 40, Madison Street, and Avenue 38. The first access point and primary residential entry will be a gated entryway located off Avenue 40, just west the intersection with Madison Street. The project will include installation a stoplight at the proposed primary entryway, aligning with the existing driveway into the Sun City Shadow Hills golf course and restaurant. The second access point and secondary residential entry to the proposed community will be located north of the intersection of Avenue 40 and Madison Street. The project will also include placing a stoplight that will align with N Sun City Boulevard. The third access point to the proposed development is located off Avenue 38. The secondary entryway is proposed to be built directly across from Talavera Boulevard. The proposed access point is proposed to have a stop sign that will allow for both left and right turns out of the community.

Surface drainage will be split between the northern and southern halves of the property, with water flowing north in the northern portion of the property, and south in the southern portion, via project roadways and managed using retention facilities within the open space paseos.

The proposed project has a land use designation of Suburban Neighborhood Low under the City of Indio General Plan Update and an existing zoning designation of Suburban Neighborhood – 8 under the City of Indio Unified Development Code. The Specific Plan that has been developed for this project will be defining and implementing its own set of zoning designations, which if adopted will supersede the zoning designations under the Unified Development Code. The proposed zoning designations under the proposed Specific Plan have been designed to complement the City of Indio General Plan Update.

The General Plan Land Use Designations, the Zoning Designations under the new Specific Plan, and the existing uses in the project area are identified in the table below:

GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND SURROUNDING EXISTING USE
General Plan 2040 Zoning Existing Use
Site: Suburban
Neighborhood High
Village Core/
Residential Low Vacant Infill Land
North:

Suburban
Neighborhood Low/
Public
PMP/ Public and
Institutional
Residential/ CVWD/
Treatment Plant
South: Suburban
Neighborhood Low Project Master Plan Sun City Shadow Hills/ Golf East: Village Core/
Residential Low Specific Plan Sun City Shadow Hills
West:

Suburban
Neighborhood High/
Public
Suburban
Neighborhood High/
Public and Institutional
High School/
Residential
PROPOSED FINDINGS:

Tentative Parcel Map

Page 2 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1259 of 1306 The Subdivision Map Act requires that, prior to any map approval, the City find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement of any tentative map or a parcel map is consistent with the general plan. (Government Code Sections 66473.5). The Findings and Conclusion Section of this report addresses the consistency of the Specific Plan’s proposed parcel division with the Subdivision Map Act.

The Indio Municipal Code provides that the City Council make the necessary findings as required by the Subdivision Map Act. Further, California Government Code Section 66474 sets forth findings that both the Planning Commission and the City Council must adopt findings required for tentative maps that are analyzed below pertaining to the proposed tentative parcel map:

1. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans in that:

The proposed parcel subdivision will be in conformance with the General Plan land use designation of the Suburban Neighborhood High (SN-H) land use designation, and with the policies and specific actions as described above. The proposed project is not within a specific plan area; rather it will be developing and implementing its own Specific Plan that is in compliance with the General Plan land use designations. Therefore, the proposed parcel subdivision, including any design and improvements, is consistent with the applicable general and specific plans.

2. The site is physically suitable for the type of development in that:

The Project Site is physically suitable for the type of development in keeping with the requirements of the general development standards of the City of Indio General Plan Update. Adequate access and infrastructure exist or will be provided as a condition of approval for the development of the project.

Furthermore, the site has no topographical constraints. Therefore, it can be determined that the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the site.

3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that:

The project site has both a land use designation of Suburban Neighborhood and a proposed Specific Plan zoning designation of Suburban Neighborhood. The SN land use designation permits the development of low-intensity detached single-family homes. The adopted Specific Plan permits the development of low-intensity detached single-family homes at 4 du/ac. The proposed tentative parcel map will be subdividing land for a 1,500 active-adult single-family housing development with associated community-serving amenities such as a clubhouse, pools, and tennis courts. The project is consistent with the City of Indio General Plan and the Specific Plan. The project will be a suitable development in keeping with the requirements of the general development standards of the Specific Plan and the General Plan 2040. Therefore, the site of the proposed subdivision proposed under Tentative Parcel Map No. 38473 is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat in that:

The project site is surrounded by heavily disturbed lands and there is no presence of fish or wildlife or their habitat on this property. There are no watercourses, streams, or wetlands present on the property. The Project is therefore not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and within the City and provides no fish or significant wildlife habitat.

5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems in that:

The proposed design of the subdivision or type of improvements contemplated by the proposed tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, as adequate sewer and water systems will be available to the resultant parcels. The parcels have the necessary infrastructure to adequately serve the proposed development and all proposed uses as allowed by the Specific Plan that regulates the Project Site.

Page 3 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1260 of 1306

6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision in that:

The design or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Public utilities for electricity, water, sewer, telecommunications, and gas service have all been assessed for availability. The access points to the project have been reviewed and approved by the Fire and Public Works Departments as part of the overall approval of the Project. There are no known public easements traversing the subject site that would be adversely affected by the Project. Therefore, the tentative parcel map will not conflict with easements acquired or required by the public at large, for access through or use of the property.

Staff concludes that based on the foregoing provisions of this report, the findings set forth in Government Code Section 66474 can affirmatively be adopted for the proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 38473 (Case File No. 22-05-469). The proposed parcel subdivision is consistent with the General Plan as it meets the SN land use designation and the Specific Plan SN zoning designation. The parcel subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed parcel subdivision as all such improvements will be constructed to be adequate for the Project, and it will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat. The required conditions of approval ensure the Project from being detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare and actually protect and promote the public health, safety, and welfare, and the conditions prevent material injury to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:

A public hearing notice was published in the Desert Sun, the newspaper of record, on September 1, 2023. A public hearing notice was mailed to property owners within a radius of a quarter (¼) mile of the subject property on September 1, 2023, consistent with Section 6.03.08 of the City of Indio Unified Development Code.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

As the Lead Agency, the City prepared a Final EIR pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; California Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq.) and in accordance with the Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA Guidelines; California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq.) The CEQA Guidelines require the City to prepare an EIR for any project that includes a request for approval of discretionary actions that may result in significant effects on the environment. The Final EIR has been prepared pursuant to

Page 4 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1261 of 1306 Section 15089 of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporates the February 2023 Draft EIR by reference; comments on the Draft EIR received during the 45-day public comment period; written responses to these comments; and corresponding revisions to the text of the Draft EIR and was approved during Planning Commission’s July 26, 2023 meeting and certified by the City of Indio City Council at the August 16, 2023 City Council meeting with a vote of 4-0.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 Resolution No. 10390
Attachment 2 TPM 38473
APPROVAL(S):

Kevin H. Snyder, Dir. Of Community Development Approved - 06 Sep 2023 Jillian Martins, Assistant City Attorney Approved - 06 Sep 2023 Javier Estrada, Senior Accountant Approved - 07 Sep 2023 Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager Approved - 07 Sep 2023

Page 5 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1262 of 1306 1 RESOLUTION NO. 10390
RESOLUTION NO. 10390 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 38473 (TPM 22-05-469) FOR THE DESERT RETREAT BY PULTE HOMES PROJECT CREATING 5 PARCELS OF LAND LOCATED ALONG AVENUE 38, AVENUE 39, AVENUE 40, JEFFERSON

STREET, AND MADISON STREET AND FINDING IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE

DESERT RETREAT FINAL EIR
WHEREAS, Pulte Home Company, LLC., 27401 Los Altos, Suite 400, Mission Viejo, CA 92691, submitted a Planning Application with supporting documentation on May 27, 2022, for a Tentative Parcel Map 38473 that will create parcels of land located along Avenue 38, Avenue 39, Avenue 40, Jefferson Street, and Madison Street in North Indio (hereafter “Project Site”); and
WHEREAS, the proposed Tentative Parcel Map will reduce the aforementioned parcels into five parcels; and
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 38473, is being created for financial purposes only; and
WHEREAS, approval of Tentative Parcel Map 38473 is considered a “project” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. (“CEQA”); and
WHEREAS, approval of Tentative Parcel Map 38473 was reviewed under the Desert Retreat Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR); and WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with and intended to implement the vision of the Desert Retreat Specific Plan and the General Plan 2040 pertaining to land use patterns, intensities, densities, building and site design and public right-of-way improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision Map Act also requires that, prior to any map approval, the City must find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement of any tentative map or a parcel map, is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan, and that the site is physically suitable for that type of development and the proposed density, and that the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems, conflict with easements, or cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat (Government Code Section 66473.5); and
WHEREAS, the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan 2040 and meets the Suburban Neighborhood High land use designation requirements and is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Desert Retreat Specific Plan; and

Page 6 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1263 of 1306 2 WHEREAS, the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed parcel subdivision as all such improvements will be constructed to be adequate for the Project, and it will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially avoidably injure fish, wildlife, or their habitat; and
WHEREAS, the proposed design of the subdivision improvements contemplated by the proposed parcel subdivision is not likely to be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare as adequate sewer and water systems will be available to the two resultant parcels. The parcels have the necessary infrastructure to adequately serve the proposed development and all proposed uses as allowed by the zoning ordinances that regulate the Project Site; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65090, on September 1, 2023, City staff published a legal notice of public hearing in the Desert Sun, the newspaper of record, and mailed notices of public hearing on September 1, 2023, to all property owners within a quarter mile of the boundaries of the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 3-0 to recommend that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2068 for the Tentative Parcel Map 38473 (Case File No. 22-05-469) for the Desert Retreat Project on August 9, 2023; and WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public hearing and discussion, the City Council recommended the conditional approval for this Resolution for the Tentative Parcel Map 38473 (Case File No. 22-05-469) for the Desert Retreat Project with the motion vote outcome specified in the meeting minutes for the September 18, 2023, City Council meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES, FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the recitals of this Resolution are true and correct, are incorporated into the following findings by reference, and constitute a material part of this Resolution.

Section 2. Map Findings. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, including the staff report and written and verbal testimony, the City Council hereby finds:
a. The Tentative Parcel Map 38473 (Case File No. 22-05-469) are in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act.
b. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans in that the Project is proposing to develop 1,500 active adult communities, a community clubhouse, a community landscape plan, and recreational amenities and is consistent with the General Plan 2040 and the Desert Retreat Specific Plan.

Page 7 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1264 of 1306 3 c. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans in that the proposed parcel subdivision will be in conformance with the General Plan land use designation of the SN-H land use designation and with the policies and specific actions in the Desert Retreat Specific Plan and General Plan 2040.
d. The site is physically suitable for the type of development in that adequate access and infrastructure exist or will be provided. Furthermore, the site has no topographical constraints.
e. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the SN-H and Village Core designation calls for detached single-family housing units at approximately 4 dwelling units per acre and is consistent with the General Plan 2040 and the Unified Development Code. f. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat in that the Project Site is surrounded by heavily disturbed lands and there is no presence of fish or wildlife or their habitat on this property. There are no watercourses, streams, or wetlands present on the property. The Project is therefore not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and within the City and provides no fish or significant wildlife habitat.
g. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems in that adequate sewer and water systems will be available to the two resultant parcels. The parcels have the necessary infrastructure to adequately serve the proposed 1,500 active adult residential units, community clubhouse, and community amenities and all proposed uses as allowed by the specific plan that regulates the Project Site.
h. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision in that public utilities for electricity, water, sewer, telecommunications, and gas service have all been assessed for availability. There are no known public easements traversing the subject site that would be adversely affected by the Project. Therefore, the parcel subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired or required by the public at large, for access through or use of the property.

Section 3. Recommendation. Based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby CONDITIONALLY APPROVES Tentative Parcel Map 38473 (Case File No. 22-05-469).

The Applicant shall The Applicant shall fully comply with the Conditions of Approval that are found within the previously adopted resolution for the Desert Retreat by Pulte Homes Tentative Tract Map. Failure to demonstrate compliance to these conditions of approval

Page 8 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1265 of 1306 4 may result in the delay of the proposed use or the rescinding of the City of Indio’s project approval. Where the term “Applicant” is used in any condition of approval, this term shall apply also to the Property owner, any developer, or any success in the interest of the Applicant. It is the Applicant's or Applicant’s successor in interest responsibility to fully comply with the conditions of approval unless subsequently modified in accordance with the City’s required processes and procedures:

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the passage, approval, and adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of September 2023, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

OSCAR ORTIZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:

CYNTHIA HERNANDEZ, CMC

CITY CLERK

Page 9 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1266 of 1306 EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY & LOT LINE AVENUE 40

KEVIN ROAD

JEFFERSON STREET
MADISON STREET AVENUE 38

BURR STREET

TARR ROAD
PRIMROSE LANE N 89°51'59" E 997.56'
N 00°07'22" E 617.81' N 89°52'45" E 1944.14'
N 00°03'19" W 2597.12' N 00°03'00" W 1338.96' N 89°47'18" E 2619.21' N 00°10'56" E 1282.92' N 89°46'30" E 1322.48'
N 00°16'45" E 2617.13' N 89°51'13" E 666.87'
N 00°11'58" W 792.04' N 89°51'13" E 618.85'
N 00°26'19" E 542.79' N 89°52'05" E 2609.76' N 44°54'43" E 35.34' BURR STREET LINDY LANE AVENUE 39 PARCEL 5 2,987,941 SF 68.59 AC. PARCEL 4 2,526,911 SF 58.01 AC. PARCEL 3 3,443,937 SF 79.06 AC. PARCEL 1 4,559,106 SF 104.66 AC. PARCEL 2 2,933,454 SF 67.35 AC. 37'
140' 407'
121'
134'
2845' 2678' 59'
37'
970'
110' 197'
702' 2203' 42'
1915' 927'
430'
N 00°10'56" E 667.74' N 89°52'22" E 665.73'
2743'
1318'
711'
927' 883' 325'
44'
480'471'
1 2' 125'
173'
1734'
1480' EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY & LOT LINE EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY & LOT LINE 40' 1 30' 2 3 60'
4 18'
5 1' 7
8 9 18' 10 11 1' 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 1414 14 19 18 18 20 21 A
A
C
30' 44'
74'
C
50'
B 50'
B
B 30' 50'
B
B 30' 50'
B AVENUE 40

JEFFERSON STREET
MADISON STREET AVENUE 38 AVENUE 39 SECTION A-A AVENUE 40 (PUBLIC ROAD) N.T.S. 100' R/WEX. R/W PROP. 42' (EX. IMPROVEMENTS) 42' CL 30' 16' PROP. RAISED MEDIAN 2% 12' PROP. PARKWAY 12' 30' EX. PARKWAY 5' 11' 5' BIKE LANE 5' EX. BIKE LANE A.C. PAVEMENT OVER A.B. PROP. BARRIER CURB PROP. BARRIER CURB EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. CURB & GUTTER EX. MEANDERING SIDEWALK PROP. MEANDERING SIDEWALK SECTION B-B JEFFERSON STREET (PUBLIC ROAD) N.T.S. 100' R/WEX. R/W PROP. 35' 35' CL10' PAINTED MEDIAN OR LEFT-TURN LANE 25' 5' 15' PROP. PARKWAY 15' EX. PARKWAY 5' 25' EX. BIKE LANE BIKE LANE EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. CURB & GUTTER SECTION D-D MADISON STREET (PUBLIC ROAD) N.T.S. 88' R/W PROP. R/WEX. 32' 32' CL 22' 10' PAINTED MEDIAN OR LEFT-TURN LANE 5' 22' 5' 12' PROP. PARKWAY 12' EX. PARKWAY EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. CURB & GUTTER EX. MEANDERING SIDEWALK PROP. MEANDERING SIDEWALK SECTION C-C AVENUE 38 (PUBLIC ROAD) N.T.S. 70' R/WEX. R/W PROP. 23' 23' CL10' PAINTED MEDIAN OR LEFT-TURN LANE 13' 5' 12' BIKE LANE PROP. PARKWAY 5' 13' 12' EX. BIKE LANE EX. PARKWAY EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. CURB & GUTTER MSA CONSULTING, INC. > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com SHEET SHEETS 3OF 1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38473 DATA TABLE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 691-100-021, -023, -025 & 691-110-002, -003, -004, -008, -011 & -014 EXHIBIT DATE: MAY 25, 2022 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. 7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A" RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503 DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY: SEPTEMBER 18, 2021 TELEPHONE: (951) 687-4252 PUBLIC UTILITY PURVEYORS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY VERIZON COMPANY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TIME WARNER CABLE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT EXISTING GROSS ACREAGE 377.67 AC. EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL LOW DISTRICT (RL) / VILLAGE CORE SPECIFIC PLAN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESCRIPTION: ACREAGE: PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 3 79.06 AC. PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 2 67.35 AC. ZONE "A" & "A" LOMR AS SHOWN ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL MAP NUMBER: 06065C162OG FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 28, 2008. EXHIBIT PREPARER: ADDRESS: MSA CONSULTING, INC. 34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270 CONTACT: PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP TELEPHONE: (760) 320-9811 REVISIONS NO. DATE LIQUEFACTION: LOW LIQUEFACTION ZONE NOTES: 1. SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD IN THE CITY OF INDIO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (760) 324-4991 (800) 427-2200 (800) 483-5000 (760) 398-2651 (760) 340-1312 (760) 398-2651 (800) 227-2600 DESCRIPTION ELECTRIC: GAS: TELEPHONE: WATER: CABLE: SEWER: USA: THIS MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER. 2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES KNOWN ON THIS PROPERTY. PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 4 58.01 AC. PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 1 104.66 AC. PARCEL 1: (APN: 691-110-002) THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. PARCEL 2: (APN: 691-110-003) THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. PARCEL 3: (APN: 691-110-014) THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONDEMNED UNTO THE DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; A CALIFORNIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BY JUDGMENT IN CONDEMNATION RECORDED JUNE 13, 2007, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-385824, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF INDIO BY GRANT DEED RECORDED APRIL 10, 2008, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-177750, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL 4: (APN: 691-100-025 AND 691-110-004) PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11214, A SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 55, PAGES 40 AND 41 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; EXCEPT ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED IN DEEDS FROM BARBARA RAE DIRNBERGER, AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF MICHAEL EUGENE CARR, A MINOR, TO LEONARD K. FIRESTONE AND POLLY C. FIRESTONE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 1959, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 18, 1959 AND FROM RICHARD W. LAWRENCE, ET AL, TO LEONARD K. FIRESTONE AND POLLY C. FIRESTONE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DATED AUGUST 11, 1959, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1959. PARCEL 6: (APN: 691-110-008) THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO, BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 54’30" WEST, ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1,332.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06'05" EAST, ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 667.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53’56" WEST, ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, 332.82 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 07’56" EAST, ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2, 390.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 92’04" WEST 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH OO DEGREES 07’56" WEST, 38.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52’04" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 7: (APN: 691-110-011) PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 11214, AS SHOWN ON A MAP ON FILE IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 55, PAGE(S) 40 AND 41, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPT ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED IN DEEDS FROM BARBARA RAE DIRNBERGER, AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF MICHAEL EUGENE CARR, A MINOR, TO LEONARD K. FIRESTONE AND POLLY C. FIRESTONE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 1959 AND FIELD FOR RECORD SEPTEMBER 16, 1959 AND FROM RICHARD W. LAWRENCE, ET. AL. TO LEONARD K. FIRESTONE AND POLLY C. FIRESTONE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DATED AUGUST 11, 1959 AND FILED FOR RECORD SEPTEMBER 16, 1959, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 8: (APN: 691-100-021 AND 691-100-023) PARCELS 1 AND 2, LETTERED LOTS E THROUGH I, INCLUSIVE, AND K THROUGH N, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14518, AS SHOWN ON A MAP ON FILE IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 87, PAGE(S) 89 AND 90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ADDRESS: ZONE "X": 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD & AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD FOR FINANCING PURPOSES INDEX MAP SCALE: 1" = 600' PROPOSED PARCEL NO. 5 68.59 AC. 1 EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES: DRAINAGE AND STORM WATER PROTECTION AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED APRIL 3, 1946 AS BOOK 736, PAGE 313 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A RESOLUTION DATED 30' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR IRRIGATION, UNDERGROUND POWER LINE OR LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JANUARY 12, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 5308 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) 1' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT FOR OVERHEAD AND/OR DECEMBER 4, 1931 AS BOOK 57, PAGE 364 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) 40' EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED3 DECEMBER 29, 1949 A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1949 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3473, OFFICIAL RECORDS, ACCEPTED SUCH EASEMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID DISTRICT. (PLOTTED HEREON)2 INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 5, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 91-186972 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) 60' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF FARFURA RANCH, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP FOR4 NECESSARY APPURTENANCES, MAINTENANCE THEREOF AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MARCH 4, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 93-81007 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 18' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FOR PIPELINE AND (PLOTTED HEREON)5 DATA TABLE CONTINUED MAY 8, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2001-200119 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LESSOR: DESERT MIST FARMS / LESSEE: OCEAN MIST FARMS (RANCHO GLORIA) AN UNRECORDED LEASE AS DISCLOSED BY AN AMENDED FINANCIAL STATEMENT RECORDED6 PURPOSES, RECORDED JANUARY 28, 1952 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2890 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 7: (PLOTTED HEREON) 1' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT FOR POWER LINE AND INCIDENTAL7 INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 343763 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR WATER PIPELINE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AUTHORIZATION RECORDED JANUARY 26. 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0036631 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 7: (PLOTTED HEREON)8 INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 430297 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 7: (PLOTTED HEREON) AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR WATER PIPELINE AND9 PIPELINE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 461126 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 7: (PLOTTED HEREON) 18' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FOR UNDERGROUND 10 PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0055361 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 7: (PLOTTED HEREON) AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FOR UNDERGROUND 11 DRAINAGE AND STORM WATER PROTECTION FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED APRIL 3, 1946 AS BOOK 736, PAGE 313 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, FOR IRRIGATION, 12 AFFECTS PARCEL 8: (BLANKET EASEMENT) PURPOSES, RECORDED JANUARY 12, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 5308 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL 8: (PLOTTED HEREON) 1' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT FOR POWER LINES AND INCIDENTAL 13 DEDICATED TO PUBLIC USE ON PARCEL MAP NO. 14518, PM 87/89-90. AN EASEMENT FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. SHOWN AND AFFECTS PARCEL 8: (PLOTTED HEREON) 14 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-49, THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED RESOLUTION OF THE RECORDED AUGUST 6, 2003 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2003-597460 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 15 AFFECTS ALL PARCELS SERVICE AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 4, 2015 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0345582 OF THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED STANDARD IRRIGATION OFFICIAL RECORDS. (AFFECTS PARCELS 1-4 AND 6-8) 1618 230' WIDE BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-311-C-R1 (PLOTTED HEREON) 155' WIDE BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-311-D-R1, 19 (PLOTTED HEREON) 180' X 230' WIDE BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-311-C-R2. P.M. 11214 BK 55 PG 40-41 20' INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT INST NO. 37115 REC. 4/16/1969, O.R. AS SHOWN ON (PLOTTED HEREON) 20 MAINTAINING POWER LINES AND NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AT BOOK 1508, PAGE 289, 29' IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTING, OPERATING AND RECORDED 9/16/1953. (PLOTTED HEREON) 21 N.T.S. VICINITY MAP AVENUE 38 SITE AVENUE 38 AVENUE 42

JEFFERSON STREET

MADISON STREET

VARNER ROAD

MONROE STREET

ADAMS AVENUE
INTERSTATE 10 EAST NORTH SOUTH WEST CENTERLINE EASEMENT EXISTING (E) (N) (S) (W) C/L ESMT. EX. ABBREVIATIONS AC ACREAGE C&G CURB AND GUTTER APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT A.C. ASPHALT CONCRETE MIN. MINIMUM MAX. MAXIMUM EXISTING IRRIGATION EXISTING GAS EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING ELECTRIC EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE EXISTING CABLE EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS LEGEND X EXISTING EASEMENT DELTA EXISTING LOT LINE EXISTING TELEPHONE BNDRY BOUNDARY EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT M.B. MAP BOOK EXISTING SEWER EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN EXISTING WATER PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BOUNDARY NUMBER PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY TYPICAL NO. PROP. R/WTYP. P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SF SQUARE FEET R RADIUS STD. STANDARD P/L PROPERTY LINE N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE R-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL) UG UNDERGROUND O/H OVERHEAD OS/PP OPEN SPACE / PARKS PG. PAGE EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE APPLICANT: ADDRESS: CONTACT: 27401 LOS ALTOS, SUITE 400 MISSION VIEJO, CALIFORNIA 92691 DAVID DEWEGELI TELEPHONE: (760) 578-9334 PULTE HOME COMPANY, LLC LAND OWNER: ADDRESS: CONTACT: 73111 EL PASEO, SUITE 208 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 BERNARD J. DEBONNE TELEPHONE: (760) 774-0433 SALAMMBO, LLC LAND OWNER: ADDRESS: CONTACT: 80600 AVENUE 40 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92203 MANUEL PABLO TELEPHONE: (760) 238-6944 MANUEL AND MARGARET PABLO R:\2577\ACAD\Planning\Tentative Map\2577 TPM 38473.dwg, 5/24/2022 4:49:00 PM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.

Page 10 of 10 ends

Resolution No. 10390, conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 38473... Page 1267 of 1306 City of Indio
City Council
September 18, 2023

STAFF REPORT
To: City Council
From: Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager
Prepared by: Kevin H. Snyder, Dir. Of Community Development Subject: Request for approval from the City Council for a Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale General – Eating Place Liquor License for Miles DTI LLC, (Case File No. 23-08-72) located at 82-851 Miles Avenue, Unit 2, Indio CA 92201 & 82-867 Miles Avenue, Indio, CA 92201.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity (Case No. 23-08-72) to authorize the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for on-site consumption and beer and wine for off-site consumption identified as a Type 47 On-Sale General – Eating Place Liquor License issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for a new restaurant located at 82-851 Miles Avenue, Unit 2, Indio, CA 92201 & 82867 Miles Avenue, Indio, CA 92201.

SUMMARY:

On August 22, 2023, James Paige, on behalf of Miles DTI, LLC., filed an application with the Community Development Department requesting the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale General – Eating Place Liquor License from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) to authorize the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for on-site consumption and beer and wine for off-site consumption at 82-851 Miles Avenue, Unit 2, Indio, CA 92201 & 82-867 Miles Avenue, Indio, CA 92201.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

On July 24, 2023, the applicant submitted an application to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for a Type 47 On-Sale General – Eating Place liquor license for a new restaurant located at 82851 Miles Avenue, Unit 2 Indio, CA 92201 & 82867 Miles Avenue, Indio, CA 92201, to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for on-site consumption and beer and wine for off-site consumption.

On August 18, 2023, ABC determined that the subject property was within a geographical area defined as an area of “undue concentration” meaning that the number of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages exceeds the amount that is permitted by ABC within the census tract that the business is located in. Currently, Census Tract 495.02 is authorized by ABC for five (5) on-sale licenses and two (2) off-sale liquor licenses. In cases of undue concentration, ABC is required to deny an application for a license if the issuance of a license would result in or add to an “undue concentration” of licenses.

However, California state law allows ABC to issue a license if the legislative body of the area in which the premises are located determines that the applicant’s license request serves the public convenience or necessity.

AGENDA ITEM #10.3
Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1268 of 1306

ANALYSIS
State Regulations – Undue Concentration of Liquor Licenses:

California Code, Business and Professions Code - BPC § 23958.4 specifies the following:
(a) For purposes of Section 23958, “undue concentration” means the case in which the applicant's premises for an original or premises-to-premises transfer of any retail license are located in an area where any of the following conditions exist:
(1) The applicant's premises are located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes, as defined in subdivision (c), than the average number of reported crimes as determined from all crime reporting districts within the jurisdiction of the local law enforcement agency.
(2) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the applicant premises are located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (3) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to the population in the census tract or census division in which the applicant premises are located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to the population in the county in which the applicant premises are located.
(b) Notwithstanding Section 23958, the department may issue a license as follows:
(1) With respect to a nonretail license, a retail on-sale bona fide eating place license, a retail license issued for a hotel, motel, or other lodging establishment, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 25503.16, a retail license issued in conjunction with a beer manufacturer's license, or a winegrower's license, if the applicant shows that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance.
(2) With respect to any other license, if the local governing body of the area in which the applicant premises are located, or its designated subordinate officer or body, determines within 90 days of notification of a completed application that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance. The 90-day period shall commence upon receipt by the local governing body of (A) notification by the department of an application for licensure, or (B) a completed application according to local requirements, if any, whichever is later.

Based on statutory guidelines, the City of Indio City Council is conducting a public hearing and will consider the issuance of a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. These actions will occur within the specified 90-day period.

General Plan, Zoning, and Existing Land Uses:

The subject property is currently designated with a Downtown (DT) land use designation pursuant to the 2040 General Plan adopted on September 18, 2019. The property is governed by the Downtown Specific Plan, adopted in April 2020, and has a current zoning designation of Downtown Core (DT-C)

Page 2 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1269 of 1306 per the adopted Downtown Specific Plan. The new restaurant and outdoor dining is located South of Miles Avenue, east of Towne Street, and west of Smurr Street.

The California Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control has identified that the project site is in an area of “undue concentration”. The ABC threshold for "undue concentration" of off-sale retail licenses in Census Tract No. 495.02 is five (5) on-sale licenses and two (2) off-sale liquor licenses. There are currently eighteen (18) establishments within Census Tract No. 495.02 that have active ABC-issued on-sale and off-sale liquor licenses as specified in Table 1:

TABLE 1

SUMMARY OF CONCENTRATION OF OFF-SALE ABC LICENSES
CENSUS TRACT 494
# License Type Business Name Address Status
1 41 Taqueria Ixtlan
83233 Indio
Boulevard, Suite
1A-2
Active
2 47 Rincon Norteno
Restaurant
83011 Indio
Boulevard Active
3 77 Rincon Norteno
Restaurant
83011 Indio
Boulevard Active
4 58 Rincon Norteno
Restaurant
83011 Indio
Boulevard Active
5 42 Club 5 82971 Bliss
Avenue Active
6 47
Applebee’s
Neighborhood
Grill & Bar
82894 Highway
111 Active
7 41 Casa De Silvia 82720 Miles
Avenue Active
8 58 El Mexicali Cafe 82720 Indio
Boulevard Active
9 47 El Mexicali Cafe 82720 Indio
Boulevard Active
10 77 El Mexicali Cafe 82720 Indio
Boulevard Active
11 47 JJ Indio Inc. 45765 Towne
Street Active
12 41 CV BBQ Inc. 83214 Requa
Avenue Active
13 64
Desert
Theaterworks
Corporation
45175 Fargo
Street Active
14 41
Valentino’s
Seafood Bar &
Grill
83085 Indio
Boulevard Active
15 47 El Tapatio
Restaurant
83161 Indio
Boulevard Active

Page 3 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1270 of 1306 TABLE 1

SUMMARY OF CONCENTRATION OF OFF-SALE ABC LICENSES
CENSUS TRACT 494
16 21 Shermans Liquor 45820 Oasis
Street Active
17 21 Los Primos
Market
46490 Calhoun
Street Active
18 40 Avenida Music 82707 Miles
Avenue Active
According to the United States Census Bureau, Census Tract 495.02 is 0.9 square miles in area with a population of 4,222. The percent of the population aged 18 and over is 73.7 while the percent of the population 65 and over is 8.1.

SURROUNDING LAND USES
The project site is generally surrounded by Downtown Core (DT-C) and Downtown Neighborhood (DT-N) zoning designations. Neighboring parcels also contain the Retail Ready Overlay (RR-O) which requires properties to maintain flexibility for if/when the market is ready for an expansion of a more urban environment (City of Indio Downtown Specific Plan, 49). The General Plan Land Use designations, the Downtown Specific Plan Zoning designation, and Existing Land Uses are outlined in Table 2 below:

TABLE 2: GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND SURROUNDING EXISTING USES General Plan 2040 Zoning Existing Use
Site: Downtown
(DT)
Downtown Core
(DT-C) Commercial Building
North: Downtown
(DT)
Downtown Core
(DT-C) Commercial Building
South: Downtown
(DT)
Downtown
Neighborhood
(DT-N)
Commercial Building
East: Downtown
(DT)
Downtown Core
(DT-C) Commercial Building
West: Downtown
(DT)
Downtown Core
(DT-C) Commercial Building

POLICE DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND CHECK INVESTIGATION
Community Development Department staff submitted the PCN application to the Indio Police Department, the Indio Building and Safety Division, and the Riverside County Fire Department. The Indio Police Department (IPD) conducted a review of the application and completed a background investigation of the applicant. IPD reported that James Paige (Owner) and Roman Whitaker (CoOwner) completed and passed the background check as of August 29, 2023. Therefore, IPD is not recommending any specific conditions of approval associated with this request and did not specify any law enforcement-related concerns for the new restaurant. Furthermore, IPD, in partnership with ABC, will enforce the laws related to the sale of alcohol from the proposed establishment.

Page 4 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1271 of 1306

PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY (PCN) DETERMINATION
Findings:

Pursuant to Section 6.04.08, Subsection C, of the City of Indio Unified Development Code, the City Council shall issue a decision approving, conditionally approving, or denying the Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity following the close of the required public hearing. In reaching its decision, the City Council shall make findings and shall consider the following factors:

I. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.

The subject property has a current General Plan 2040 land use designation of Downtown (DT) and a current Downtown Specific Plan zoning designation of Downtown Core (DT-C). The Downtown Specific Plan specifies that a new restaurant with associated indoor and outdoor dining in the Downtown Core zoning designation is a permitted land use. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan 2040 and all applicable general plan policies as well as with the zoning designation specified in the Downtown Specific Plan.

II. The proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition, and character of adjacent land uses.

The subject property is governed by the City of Indio’s Downtown Specific Plan. Properties surrounding the new restaurant to the north, east, and west by commercial buildings that are zoned Downtown Core (DT-C). The DT-C zone is characterized by lively pedestrian-oriented retail, restaurant, and service businesses. The intent of this zoning designation is to concentrate a more active ground-floor environment into the historic core along Miles Avenue. The inclusion of the new restaurant with indoor and outdoor dining is consistent with the pedestrian-oriented retail business activation outlined in the DT-C.

III. The proposed use would not have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses.

The subject property is located along Miles Avenue near its intersection with Towne Street and is in the core of the City’s Downtown. The adopted Downtown Specific Plan specifies the following vision for Downtown Indio: “Downtown Indio is a place for everyone; a human-scaled, urban center of activity concentrating community, culture, and commerce in a vibrant, walkable, mixed-use environment.” Further, Goal 2 of the Plan specifies the following goal for Downtown:

Goal 2: Lively selection of nightlife, entertainment, and recreation options:

Downtown already includes a notable concentration of civic, cultural, recreation, and entertainment amenities, and is uniquely and ideally positioned to become Indio’s most significant center of culture, nightlife, entertainment, and recreation and operate as a true “18-hour per day” district. “Downtown will operate as a true 18-hour-per-day district...” The proposed restaurant with associated indoor and outdoor dining will help fulfill the council-adopted vision for Downtown Indio and will provide cultural and entertainment amenities in an area of mutually compatible land uses. The Council’s issuance of the Public Convenience or Necessity Determination is therefore not likely to have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses and allows for potential similar uses.

Page 5 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1272 of 1306 IV. The proposed use would not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity.

Census Tract 495.02 is an area of undue concentration; however, this is reasonable given the multiple restaurants within Census Tract 495.02. The authorization of a Type 47 On-Sale General – Eating Place Liquor License for Miles DTI, LLC, would support the establishment of a viable cultural and entertainment venue in Downtown Indio that would further enhance Downtown’s ability to be an 18- hour per day district and an area offering a lively selection of nightlife and entertainment.

Conclusion:

Based on the preceding information provided herein, a review of the site and floor plans for the business, and successful completion of the Indio Police Department’s application review and background check, staff recommends that the Council approve the request for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for a Type 47 Liquor License for Miles DTI, LLC, located at 82-851 Miles Avenue, Unit 2 Indio, CA 92201 & 82-867 Miles Avenue, Indio, CA 92201.

PUBLIC NOTICE
On August 31, 2023, the City Clerk Administrator published a legal notice of public hearing in the Desert Sun, the newspaper of record. Public Hearing notices were mailed out to the public on September 8, 2023, to property owners within a 500-foot radius.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment1_Miles DTI LLC_Vicinity Map
Attachment2_Miles DTI PCN Application
Attachment3_MILES DTI ABC APPLICATION
Attachment4_MILES DTI ABC SITE PLAN
APPROVAL(S):

Kevin H. Snyder, Dir. Of Community Development Approved - 06 Sep 2023 Steven Graham, City Attorney Approved - 06 Sep 2023
Javier Estrada, Senior Accountant Approved - 07 Sep 2023 Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager Approved - 07 Sep 2023

Page 6 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1273 of 1306 Vicinity Map
82-867 Miles Ave &
82-851 Unit 2
Indio, CA 92201

Page 7 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1274 of 1306 City of Indio
Development Services Department
100 Civic Center Mall
Indio, California 92201
(760) 391-4120
(760) 391-4027 Fax
www.indio.org

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (Alcoholic Beverage Sales)
Application Fee: $3,763.00
Complete and return this form to the City of Indio, 100 Civic Center Mall, Indio, California 92201.

Completed form must include Appendix A (City).

Please print or type all information:

Name of Business ____________________________________________________________ Contact Person
Type of License
Business Address
Mailing Address
Business Phone Number
Type of Organization (Please Check One)
Sole Proprietor Partnership Corporation
List counties and cities in which licenses/permits have been issued to you or where you have conducted similar business
Area to be served

Page 8 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1275 of 1306 List nature, place of any prior conviction of a crime, misdemeanor or violation of any ordinance.

If such a conviction has been received, please state the nature of the offense and the sentence received.

Has a permit/license ever been refused or renewal denied? If so, please state when, where, and by whom and the reason therefor:

Page 9 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1276 of 1306 Applicant’s Responsibility
Mailing Labels
Applications must be accompanied by:
o Typed mailing labels of property owners within a 500 foot radius of subject parcel. o Current assessor's maps of properties included with labels. o Current assessor's list of property included on labels must be provided by and certified as to accuracy by a title company or the Riverside County Assessor's Office.

YOUR APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER FOR PROCESSING TO BEGIN. YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT

THESE ITEMS
APPLICATION FEE: $3,763.00

Page 10 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1277 of 1306

Page 11 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1278 of 1306

Page 12 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1279 of 1306

Page 13 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1280 of 1306

Page 14 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1281 of 1306

Page 15 of 16 ends

Certificate of Public Convenience or Necessity for a Type 47 On-Sale Gen... Page 1282 of 1306 NO

PARKING
MAIN
ENTRY
MILES AVE.

PROPERTY LINE
LINE OF BUILDING ENVELOPE [BELOW]

RESTAURANT AREA IN ADJACENT BUILDING
6'-0" HT METAL FENCING, U.N.O.

CONCRETE : 800 SQFT
PAVERS : 1,700 SQFT

EXISTING GRASS TO REMAIN

DG PLANTER

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
44" WIDE MIN.

SITE PLAN LEGEND:

TOWNE STREET
N89° - 47' -00" W 35'-0" TO CENTERLINE 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 150'-0" PARCEL DEPTH 0 10' 20' 40' 80' CENTERLINE ALLEY NORTH ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► ► 1 2 3 4 5 8
CENTERLINE ► ►
PL - 100'
N89° - 47' - 00"W

CITY SIDEWALK CITY SIDEWALK

EXISTING ASPHALT

PARKING LOT

EXISTING ASPHALT

PARKING LOT
[NOT A PART]
35'-0"

TO CENTERLINE
100'-0"

PARCEL WIDTH
50'-0"

PARCEL WIDTH
20'-0"
ALLEY WIDTH PL - 150' N00° - 13' - 00"E
PL - 50'
N89° - 47' - 00"W
EXIT
GATE
EXIT
GATE 6 7 9
10 EXIT

GATE CITY SIDEWALK
EP 3070 3070
PL - 50'
N89° - 47' - 00"W
LANDSCAPE LEGEND: ► ► ► ► ► ►

SOLID FENCED
AREA

FICUS OR PYRACANTHA
@ METAL FENCING
PALM TREES @ PERIMETER
SHADE TREES:

TIPUANA OR DESERT MUSEUM
REAR
BLDG.

EXIT
EXIT
GATE
REAR
BLDG.

EXIT ► ► ► ► ► ► 3070
3070
3070 ELECT.
3070 3070
3070 3070 3070
3070 3070
3070
24 x 48 EP 2 EP 1 WH
FE
FE
FE
30" x 30" @30"30" x 30" @30"
30" x 30" @30"30" x 30" @30"30" x 30" @30"
24" x 30" @30"24" x 30" @30"24" x 30" @30"24" x 30" @30" 2870 2870 CO2 3070
3070
ICE
18 x 60 18 x 60 18 x 36
18 x 48
16 lf
18 x 48
FE
18 x 48 18 x 4818 x 48 18 x 48
18 x 48
18 x 3618 x 36
34 lf
30" x 30" @30"
32" x 42" @30"
24 x 60
24 x 60
24 x 48 24 x 48
24 x 60
24 x 6024 x 60
24 x 60
3'-2" 3070 3070 3070
HB
HB
30" x 42" @30"
32" x 42" @30" 3070 3070 2870 2870
UNIT 2
3,645 SQFT
UNIT 1A
1,575 SQFT
UNIT 1

KITCHEN
700 SQFT
UNIT 1B
1,185 SQFT PL - 150' N00° - 13' - 00"E
PL - 100'
N89° - 47' - 00"W PL -150' N00° - 13' - 00"E 15'-0" 20'-0"

OUTDOOR

DINING AREA
3'-6" BARRIER RAIL AT SIDEWALK PATIO
3'-6" BARRIER RAIL AT SIDEWALK PATIO
12'
GATE
12' GATE
TRASH

ENCLOSURE
6'-0" METAL FENCING AT OUTDOOR DINING
6'-0" METAL FENCING AT OUTDOOR DINING
6'-0" METAL FENCING AT OUTDOOR DINING
TYPICAL FENCE ELEVATIONS:

SCALE: 3
16 " = 1'-0"
ABC BARRIER AT SIDEWALK 4" 3'-6"
2X2 MTL. TUBE POSTS WITH 1X2 TOP & BOTT. RAILS

WELDED WIRE MESH OR PERFORATED

SOLID SHEET, WELDED TO TUBES
2X2 MTL. TUBE TOP RAIL & POSTS
WELDED WIRE MESH, WELDED TO TUBE 4" 6'-0"
TYP. METAL FENCING / ABC BARRIER
2X2 MTL. TUBE TOP POSTS @ 6'-0" SPACING MAXIMUM

24. GA MIN. WESTERN RIB, BOXED CORRUGATED METAL PANELS 1 A600

PRIVACY FENCING
2X2 MTL. TUBE TOP POSTS @ 6'-0" SPACING MAXIMUM

24. GA MIN. WESTERN RIB, BOXED CORRUGATED METAL PANELS 6'-0" 1 A600 1A600
ABC
Site Plan A130
Site Plan
Scale: 3
32 1 " = 1'-0"

SHEET NUMBER
Drawing scale is based on 24 x 36 sheet.

Parallel Lines
601 E Tahquitz Canyon Way
Suite: 110-B
Palm Springs CA 92262
760 408 0952 ABC SITE & BUILDING PLAN
Indio Taphouse TI
82851 & 82867 Miles Ave
82871 Miles Ave. (Patio)
Indio, CA 92201
APN: 611-173-001
APN: 611-173-002 (Patio)
DRAWN BY: E.WUTZ

05.01.23 ABC PLAN
TYP. BARRIER @ SIDEWALK
Scale: 3
16 2 " = 1'-0"
TYP. FENCE @ PATIO
Scale: 3
16 3 " = 1'-0"
TYP. SOLID FENCE
Scale: 3
16 4 " = 1'-0"

Page 16 of 16 ends

City of Indio
City Council
September 18, 2023

STAFF REPORT
To: City Council
From: Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager
Prepared by: Carl S. Morgan, Dir. Of Economic Development Subject: Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (“TEFRA”) and adoption of a resolution authorizing the California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) to issue tax-exempt bonds to St. John's Community Health to finance the acquisition and renovation of the commercial building located at 82025 Highway 111 to be used as a health clinic.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 10395 approving the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for development of the St. John’s Community Health Clinic to be located at 82025 Highway 111.

SUMMARY:

St. John's Community Health, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, has applied to the California Municipal Finance Authority ("CMFA") for the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds in the not-to-exceed amount of $22,000,000. Approximately $11,500,000 of the bonds will finance the acquisition and rehab of a vacant building at 82025 Highway 111, formerly known as Dollar Tree, which will be used as a health facility. The remaining bond funds will be used by St. John's Community Health to finance other projects in San Bernardino and Los Angeles as further described in this staff report. The Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act ("TEFRA"), as part of Federal Tax Law, requires bond issuers such as the CMFA to provide a public forum for members of the public to comment regarding the proposed issuance of the bonds, and to obtain local approval prior to issuing the bonds.

As such, the CMFA has requested that the City Council conduct the required public hearing and adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the bonds. The City will not be responsible for financing or documents related to the bonds, and the bonds will not be considered a debt or obligation of the City.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

St. John's Community Health, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation and an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Borrower”) has requested that the CMFA serve as the municipal issuer of tax-exempt revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $22,000,000. Approximately $11,500,000 of the Bonds will be used by the Borrower to finance the acquisition and renovation of a 14,806 square foot building located at 82025 Highway 111 in Indio that will be used as a health clinic (the “Project”). Additional Borrower and Project information is attached. The remaining Bond funds will be used to finance acquisition and renovation projects in the cities of San Bernardino and Los Angeles in the approximate amounts of $5,500,000 and $5,000,000, respectively.

AGENDA ITEM #10.4
Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (... Page 1284 of 1306 In order for all or a portion of the Bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of Indio, serving as the "host jurisdiction" for the Indio Project must conduct a public hearing (the “TEFRA Hearing”) providing for the members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project. Additional public hearings will be held for the San Bernardino and Los Angeles Projects in their respective jurisdictions as required.

Prior to such TEFRA Hearings, reasonable notice must be provided to the members of the community.

A public hearing notice was published in The Desert Sun on September 8, 2023. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, an “applicable elected representative” of the governmental unit hosting the Project must provide its approval of the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project.

Issuance of the Bonds is not a financial obligation of the City. The City is simply hosting the public hearing as a host jurisdiction where the project/site is located.

The CMFA was created on January 1, 2004, pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement to promote economic, cultural and community development, through the financing of economic development and charitable activities throughout California. To date, over 350 municipalities, including the City of Indio, have become members of CMFA. The CMFA was formed to assist local governments, non-profit organizations and businesses with the issuance of taxable and tax-exempt bonds aimed at improving the standard of living in California. The CMFA’s representatives and its Board of Directors have considerable experience in bond financings.

The Board of Directors of the California Foundation for Stronger Communities, a California non-profit public benefit corporation (the “Foundation”), acts as the Board of Directors for the CMFA. Through its conduit issuance activities, the CMFA shares a portion of the issuance fees it receives with its member communities and donates a portion of these issuance fees to the Foundation for the support of local charities.

The CMFA will issue Bonds for the Project and the Borrower will be solely responsible for them. The City will not have any financial, legal, or moral obligation or liability for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds used to finance it. The financing documents for the Bonds will clearly state that they are not the City's or the State of California's obligations but will be paid for solely by the Borrower's funds.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY:

Current FY Financial
Impact:
$4,500 In current year budget: Yes
Current FY General
Fund Impact:
$4,500 Budget adjustment: No
Next FY Financial
Impact:
$0 Strategic Objective: Business & Job Growth
Source of funds: General Fund Fund-Org-Object
Reference:
101-407325
Additional Financial Details:

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Even though the City is a member of CMFA, the City will not be a party to the financing documents relating to the Bonds. The Bonds will not represent or constitute any debt or obligation to the City. The payment of the Bonds will be solely the responsibility of the Borrower. At this time, no City funds are being sought by the Borrower and the Developer for the financing of any portion of the Project.

However, the CMFA is expected to reimburse the City for administrative costs estimated to be $4,500.

Page 2 of 23 ends

Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (... Page 1285 of 1306 ALTERNATIVES:

1. Deny the approval of the Resolution
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 2--Project and Borrower Info
Attachment 1--Resolution No. 10395
APPROVAL(S):

Carl S. Morgan, Dir. Of Economic Development Approved - 07 Sep 2023 Jillian Martins, Assistant City Attorney Approved - 07 Sep 2023 Alan Garcia, Accountant Approved - 08 Sep 2023
Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager Approved - 08 Sep 2023

Page 3 of 23 ends

Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (... Page 1286 of 1306 Fitch Ratings Review | 1
Information for the City of Indio
August 25th, 2023

Page 4 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 2
Overview  St. John’s Community Health (SJCH) is requesting that the City of Indio hold a TEFRA hearing to be administered by California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) to allow SJCH to borrow funds for a new health center located in Indio  St. John’s Community Health (SJCH) is one of the largest Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) healthcare providers in the Los Angeles area and beyond, providing over 405,000 visits for 97,275 individual patients in 2022  SJCH has invested in growth and partnership with patients and communities, with 24 Health Centers (13 centers, 8 school-based, 3 mobile) operating in its service area and opportunities to capture additional volumes with its new projects  As an FQHC, SJCH provides primary care, dental and behavioral health services primarily to underserved, underinsured and uninsured Americans as well as migrant workers and non-U.S. citizens regardless of their ability to pay  SJCH benefits from being a Federally Qualified Health Center and receives significant reimbursement enhancements under Medi-Cal and Medicare, lower-cost pharmaceuticals under Section 340B, and “no-cost” malpractice and professional liability insurance  The remainder of the presentation provides additional information on SJCH and the new Indio Health Center which will be located on the site of the former Dollar Tree at 82025 CA Hwy 111

Page 5 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 3
SJCH Overview
1964
1993
1999
COVID
2023
St. John’s Community Health was founded in 1964
as a Two Room Pediatric Health Center in the back
building of St. John’s Episcopal Church
St. John’s hired Jim Mangia as CEO in 1993 with the
goal to grow the organization and integrate St.

John’s into the L.A. healthcare delivery system.

St. John’s applies to the Heath Resources &
Services Administration (HRSA) and was selected as
a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) under
Section 330 of the federal health and safety code.

During COVID, St. John’s administered over 500,000
vaccinations, the largest of any FQHC, opening 26
vaccine sites within three weeks.

Today, St. John’s has 21 health center sites, 3 mobile
Health Center units, and serves over 130,000 patients
for 450,000 visits annually (327,791 medical, 82,721
dental, and 36,488 behavioral health visits).

Page 6 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 4
SJCH Mission, Vision and Values
Dignity
We honor and respect every person we encounter—
whether patient, colleague, or community member—
as a valued part of the human family.

Well-Being
We promote and advocate for the full integration of
our patients’ physical and mental health in order to
enable them to participate in their own health
improvement and become active and responsible
members of a vibrant and just community
Our mission is to improve community health
and reduce health disparities by delivering
high quality, comprehensive services and
impacting health and social policy.

Excellence
We support and champion the best standard of care,
personal and professional growth, accountability,
creativity, teamwork, and a steadfast commitment to
quality.

Social Justice
We collaborate with others to develop systems,
organizations and programs to advance equity and
fairness in allocating community resources, and to
empower and address the needs of all community
members, especially the most vulnerable and
disadvantaged members.

Values
Mission
St. John’s Community Health will be a catalyst
for health equity and a leader in establishing
systems of care, prevention strategies and
public policies that promote social justice and
community health improvement.

Vision

Page 7 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 5
Leadership and Governance
Jim Mangia, MPH

PRESIDENT &

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Ernesto Barahona

CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Ana Barahona

CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER
Tim Neiman

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Sharon Correa

CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
Elizabeth Meisler

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Elena Fernandez, LCSW

CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER
Sushant Bandarpalle, MD

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
Darryn Harris
CHIEF OF GOV. AFFAIRS AND

COMMUNITY RELATIONS

MANAGEMENT TEAM
BOARD OF DIRECTORS • 9-15 Directors (Currently 15) – Majority representative of client base • Directors serve a 3 year term • Quality, Finance and Audit Committees • Experienced, knowledgeable team with a long tenure at SJCH and defined succession planning
Peter Tawfik
CHIEF Pharmacy Officer

Page 8 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 6
Employees and Providers • SJCH employs a staff of 933 FTE • Clinical Staff • 23 FTE Physicians • 61 FTE Mid-Level Practitioners • 24 FTE Dentist • 12 FTE Mental Health Providers • 2 FTE Nutritionist • Physician and Mid-Level Provider Recruitment and Retention • SJCH has been able to maintain and attract clinicians • Minimal use of agency staffing • Service Employees International Union Local 721 • Contract renewed March 1, 2023 with a 3 year term • 61% Employees

Page 9 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 7
Scope of Services*
SJCH provides a variety of services to a patient population of over 100,000 through its 13 Health Centers, 8 School-Based Health Centers and 3 Mobile Health Centers. Services include:

Women’s Health Perinatal Health Services Adult & Pediatric Primary/Preventative Care
Transgender Health Substance Use Counseling &
Treatment
Behavioral Health Counseling &
Treatment
Community Outreach & Health
Education
Homeless & Public Housing
Healthcare
Re-Entry Health & Full Scope
Services
HIV, AIDS, HCV Children With Special Needs Laboratory & Pharmacy Insurance Counseling &
Enrollment Housing Navigation Environmental Health
* See Appendix A for full list of programs and services

Page 10 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 8
Quality Indicators
Quality Indicators • Primary Care Medical Home (PCMH) Level-3 Designation • National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) – 2023/2024 Period • Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) • $ 9,141,780 Received for project period of 3/1/23 – 2/29/24

Page 11 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 9
Community Health Centers (13)
2 – S. Mark Taper Foundation Health
and Wellness Center
1 - Dr. Louis C. Frayser Health Center
4 – W.M. Keck Foundation Health
Center
3 – Magnolia Place Health Center
6 – East Compton Health Center at
Casa Dominguez
5 – Lynee Gillies Pediatric Health
Center
8 – Rev. Warner Traynham Health
Center
7 – Leavey Health Center
10 – Rolland Curtis Gardens Health
Center
9 – Crenshaw Adult and Pediatric
Health Center
11 – Avalon Health and Access Center 12 – Boys & Girls Club Dental Clinic 13 – St. Johns/SSN Special Needs
Health Center
School-Based Health Centers (8)
15 – YES Academy / Hyde Park
Elementary
14 – Lincoln High School
16 – Mark Ridley-Thomas Wellness 17 – Dominguez High School Center at Manual Arts
18 – Washington Prep Wellness 19 – Compton College
Center
21 – Roosevelt School Based Health
Center
20 – Sylvia Mendez Wellness Center
Mobile Health Centers (3)
22/23/24 – Multiple Locations in South Los Angeles and Compton Current Facilities

Page 12 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 10
Overview of Health Centers
IBH
Rooms
Dental
Op.

Exam
Rooms
Annual
Visits
Square
Feet
Care
Hours
Leased/
Owned # Health Center Site Address City
Existing Health Centers 2023 1 Dr. Louis C. Frayser 5701 South Hoover Street Los Angeles Own 40 12,945 59,742 16 8 1 2 Williams 808 W. 58th St Los Angeles Own 54 9,920 75,330 14 4 4 3 Magnolia 4131 S. Vermont Avenue Los Angeles Lease 40 4,500 34,336 8 4 4 Compton Adult and IBH 2115 N. Wilmington Ave. Compton Own 54 8,100 66,903 16 6 3 5 Compton Pediatric 2116 N. Wilmington Ave. Compton Own 54 2,550 4 6 Lease 40 2,000 16,163 6 Rancho
Dominguez 6 East Compton 15715 S. Atlantic Ave. 7 Leavey 2512 Alta Street Los Angeles Lease 40 3,200 13,113 8 8 Traynham 326 W. 23rd St. Los Angeles Service 54 7,600 35,285 10 2 2 9 Crenshaw 1 4251 Crenshaw Los Angeles Lease 40 11,700 11,380 4 2 10 Rolland Curtis 1060 W. Exposition Blvd. Los Angeles Lease 40 6,500 12,527 8 5 3 11 Avalon 6818 Avalon Blvd. Los Angeles Service 40 12,000 10,535 10 6 3 12 Boys & Girls Club 1000 West 50th St Los Angeles Lease 40 850 1,101 2 Jacqueline Avant 1741 East 120th St, 1st Floor Los Angeles Lease 40 12,000 8 6 2 113 14 Lincoln SBHC 1910 S. Magnolia Ave. Los Angeles Lease 40 2,160 9,096 4 15 Hyde Park SBHC 6505 8th Ave.Los Angeles Los Angeles Lease 40 1,700 12,598 2 2 16 Manual Arts SBHC 4131 S. Vermont Avenue Los Angeles Lease 40 1,600 14,782 4 2 17 Dominguez SBHC 15301 San Jose Ave Compton Lease 40 2,940 18,541 6 3 1 18 Washington SBHC 1555 W. 110th St Los Angeles Lease 40 3,000 12,504 4 2 19 Compton College 1111 E. Artesia Blvd. Compton Lease 40 1,000 4,203 2 1 20 Mendez SBHC 1321 East 1st Street Los Angeles Lease 40 5,600 153 8 3 2 Roosevelt High 444 S. Matthews Street Los Angeles Lease 40 5,916 4 3 2 221 22 Mobile 1 808 W. 58th St Los Angeles Own 40 100 723 2 23 Mobile 2 808 West 58th St Los Angeles Own 40 100 1,167 2 24 Mobile 3 808 West 58th St Los Angeles Own 40 100 867 2 Health Center Total 1,016 118,081 411,049 152 66 24
Corporate/Pharmacy 40,683
All SJCH Facilities Total 158,764
Notes: 1- The Jacqueline Avant Health Center, adjacent to the Martin Luther King Hospital in Compton opened in July 2023. It is funded by Los Angeles County 2- The Roosevelt Health Center opens in September 2023. It is a School Based Health Center funded by Los Angeles Unified School District

Page 13 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 11
History of Expansion
1993
1999
2006
2020
2023
SJCH hires Jim Mangia as CEO
Selected as a FQHC
Open second site in Compton, CA
Opens 10th site, serving over 50,000 patients
20 sites, serving over 100,000 patients
Today, SJCH is the largest healthcare provider in South and East Los Angeles, serving over 97,000 patients (405,000+ visits annually in 2022) over 21 sites and 3 mobile Health Centers SJCH has grown from a small, single-site volunteer organization with a $100,000 budget to the large $130,000,000 organization serving the community today

Page 14 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 12
New & Expanded Health Centers:
2023-2025
Opening
Date # Health Center Site Address City Lease/Own
Care
Hours
Square
Feet
Exam
Rooms
Dental
Op.

IBH
Rooms Funded by
Expanded Health Centers 2023
2023 LAUSD Hyde Park Expansion 6505 8th Ave. Los Angeles Lease 40 4,000 6 4 LAUSD 2023 LAUSD Manual Arts Expansion 4131 S. Vermont Ave. Los Angeles Lease 54 4,600 6 3 LAUSD New Health Centers 2023
12/1/2023 25 San Bernardino 1500 North Waterman San Bernardino Own 40 15,000 18 8 4 SJCH, Bond, Grants 1/1/2024 26 San Jacinto Rental 1821 South San Jacinto Ave. San Jacinto Lease 40 2,520 4 2 SJCH New Health Center 2024-2025
1/1/2024 27 Mobile 4 808 West 58th St Los Angeles Own 40 100 2 SJCH 12/1/2024 28 Indio 82025 CA Hwy 111 Indio Own 40 14,825 18 8 4 Bond 12/1/2025 29 Compton Wellness Center 1310-1320, 1404, 1508 Long Beach Blvd Compton Own 40 18,000 6 3 12 SJCH, Grants NEW AND EXPANDED HEALTH CENTERS 294 59,045 60 28 20
ADJUSTED NEW HEALTH CENTER TOTAL 1,310 177,126 212 94 44 GROWTH 29% 50% 39% 42% 83%
ADJUSTED OVERALL SPACE TOTAL 217,809
GROWTH 37% Page 15 of 23 AGENDA ITEM #10.4 Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (... Page 1298 of 1306 Fitch Ratings Review | 13
Indio Health Center
Indio (Coachella Valley): • Population of 97,137 - 24% poverty • 34% Medi-Cal, 15% Medicare • FQHC Penetration is under 30% Property: • Former Dollar Tree Store • High Traffic Cross Street – Monroe St.

Health Center Financing: • $2,980,000 ($201/sq. ft., 14,825 sq. ft.) • Initial escrow deposit of $90k made on February 22, 2023 • Purchased 5/22/23, to be reimbursed at closing • $2,980,000 purchase price to be reimbursed from bond proceeds • $6,550,000 renovation to be funded from bond proceeds Health Center Opening Date: 12/1/2024
SJCH is additionally purchasing a 4th Mobile Health Center for Indio • Opening 1/1/2024 ($550k purchase price) Renovation
$6,550,000
Price
$2,980,000
Exam Rooms
18M, 8D, 4BH
Square Feet
14,825
Visit Capacity
75,000 visits / yr.

By 2027 18 of the 30 exam rooms are
projected to be utilized, meaning there
is an additional 40% of capacity
available in future years.

Page 16 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 14
DENTAL 2 DENTAL 3 DENTAL 4 DENTAL 5 DENTAL 6
(E) FIRE RISER
ROOM
EXAM 2 EXAM 3 EXAM 4 EXAM 5 EXAM 6 RECEPTION

SEPARATE
TENANT
6,104 S.F. WAITING
STAFF

TOILET CLINIC MANAGER
13'-0" X 10'-0" STAFF
TOILET

PATIENT

TOILET CLEAN
EXAM 8 EXAM 9 GROUP BEHAVIORAL
13'-0" X 11'-0" BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 1 DENTAL
LAB
17'-0" X 10'-6" MEDICAL
LAB
17'-0" X 13'-0" DENTAL 1
8'-6" X 13'-7"

BREAK ROOM
20'-0" X 24'-0" BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 3 EXAM 10

JANITOR

LOCKERS

OPEN OFFICE
VITALS
8'-0" X 10'-0" EXAM 1
8'-3" X 10'-0" MEDICAL STORAGE
10'-0" X 8'-3" LACTATION
8'-0" X 10'-6" 8'-0" X 10'-0" DIRTY
8'-0" X 10'-0"
I.T. 8'-0" X 11'-6" DENTAL EQUIP. PATIENT

TOILET SUPPLY

CASE WORKERS
20'-0" X 10'-0" ST. MED. WASTE
9'-10" X 10'-3" 9'-10" X 10'-3" OFFICE
10'-0" X 8'-0" OFFICE
10'-0" X 8'-0"

CONFERENCE
14'-6" X 11'-0" OFFICE
12'-6" X 11'-0" PATIENT

TOILET BENEFIT'S OFFICE REGISTRATION
KIOSKS
10'-6" X 39'-0" EXAM 7
9'-10" X 10'-3" PHARMACY
802 S.F. STORAGE
5'-0" X 11'-0"

PATIENT

TOILET PATIENT
TOILET
ST. JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH
82025 HIGHWAY 111
INDIO, CA 92201
08/10/2023 N
LEGEND

NEW WALLS

EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN
TOTAL AREA DEVELOPED: 11,543 S.F.
1/16"=1'-0" 1 PROPOSEDFLOOR
PLAN
Proposed Floor Plan

Page 17 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 15
Demographic Breakdown of Patients: FY 2022
Source Data: UDS Report to HRSA for Year Ending 12/31/2022 Patients by Age & Gender

Page 18 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 16
Demographic Breakdown of Patients: FY 2022
Source Data: UDS Report to HRSA for Year Ending 12/31/2022 Patients by Race

Page 19 of 23 ends

Fitch Ratings Review | 17
Demographic Breakdown of Patients: FY 2022
Source Data: UDS Report to HRSA for Year Ending 12/31/2022 Patients by Income as a Percent of Poverty Level

Page 20 of 23 ends

1 RESOLUTION NO. 10395

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO APPROVING

THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL

FINANCE AUTHORITY IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $22,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE ACQUISITION AND RENOVATION OF HEALTH FACILITIES FOR ST. JOHN’S COMMUNITY

HEALTH AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO
WHEREAS, the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) is authorized to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose, among others, of financing or refinancing the construction of capital projects; and WHEREAS, the Authority has informed the City Council of the City of Indio (“City Council”) that St. John’s Community Health, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation and an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Corporation”), has requested that the Authority participate in the issuance of revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $22,000,000 (the “Bonds”), of which approximately $11,500,000 will be used to finance the acquisition and renovation of a 14,806 square foot building located at 82025 Highway 111 in the City of Indio, California, to be used as a health clinic (the “Project”).

Additionally, the remaining Bond funds will be used to finance acquisition and renovation projects in the cities of San Bernardino and Los Angeles in the approximate amounts of $5,500,000 and $5,000,000; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority must be approved by the “applicable elected representative” required to approve the issuance of Bonds under section 147(f) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Project is located within the territorial limits of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is the elected legislative body of the City and is one of the “applicable elected representatives” required to approve the issuance of the Bonds under section 147(f) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies, including the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds,

Page 21 of 23 ends

Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (... Page 1304 of 1306 2 and now desires to approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO,

CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council hereby approves, solely for the purposes stated in this resolution, the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitutes approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, for the purposes of (a) section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said section 147(f) and (b) Section 4 of the Agreement.

Section 3. The issuance of the Bonds shall be subject to the approval of the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party.

The City shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to the Bonds.

Section 4. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing to acquire or construct the Project or any refinancing of the Project; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation or operation of the Project; (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority; (iv) take any further action with respect to the Authority or its membership therein; or (v) make any investigations, representations, or disclosures in connection with the Bonds.

Section 5. The officers of the City, including by way of example and not as a limitation, the City Manager, the Finance Director, and the City Clerk, are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing transaction approved hereby.
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /

Page 22 of 23 ends

Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (... Page 1305 of 1306 3 Section 6. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to:

Brian D. Quint, Esq.

Quint & Thimmig LLP
900 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 270
Larkspur, CA 94939-1726
and to
Ronald E. Lee, Esq.

Jones Hall, APLC
475 Sansome Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94111
Section 7. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of September, 2023.

OSCAR ORTIZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:

SABDI SANCHEZ, CMC

CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATOR

Page 23 of 23 ends

Public Hearing pursuant to the Tax Equity Financial Responsibility Act (... Page 1306 of 1306

Indio City CouncilSeptember 18, 2023

Indio City Council
September 18, 2023