Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1893 of 3061 File Name : 03_IND_JACKSON_ARCO DWY_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: ARCO Driveway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Jackson Street
Southbound
ARCO Driveway
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 89 89 0 5 5 37 7 44 138
07:15 AM 0 128 128 0 1 1 38 9 47 176
07:30 AM 0 152 152 0 3 3 48 14 62 217
07:45 AM 0 142 142 0 7 7 45 9 54 203
Total 0 511 511 0 16 16 168 39 207 734
08:00 AM 0 80 80 0 9 9 65 17 82 171
08:15 AM 0 78 78 0 9 9 50 8 58 145
08:30 AM 0 80 80 0 3 3 53 9 62 145
08:45 AM 0 92 92 0 11 11 62 13 75 178
Total 0 330 330 0 32 32 230 47 277 639
Grand Total 0 841 841 0 48 48 398 86 484 1373
Apprch % 0 100 0 100 82.2 17.8
Total % 0 61.3 61.3 0 3.5 3.5 29 6.3 35.3
Jackson Street
Southbound
ARCO Driveway
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 128 128 0 1 1 38 9 47 176
07:30 AM 0 152 152 0 3 3 48 14 62 217
07:45 AM 0 142 142 0 7 7 45 9 54 203
08:00 AM 0 80 80 0 9 9 65 17 82 171
Total Volume 0 502 502 0 20 20 196 49 245 767
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 80 20
PHF .000 .826 .826 .000 .556 .556 .754 .721 .747 .884
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1894 of 3061 File Name : 03_IND_JACKSON_ARCO DWY_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: ARCO Driveway
Weather: Clear
Jackson Street
ARCO Driveway
Jackson Street
Thru
502
Left
0 Out In Total
216 502 718
Right
20 Left
0 Out Total In
49 20 69
Thru
196
Right
49 Out In Total
502 245 747
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM
+0 mins. 0 89 89 0 9 9 65 17 82
+15 mins. 0 128 128 0 9 9 50 8 58
+30 mins. 0 152 152 0 3 3 53 9 62
+45 mins. 0 142 142 0 11 11 62 13 75
Total Volume 0 511 511 0 32 32 230 47 277
% App. Total 0 100 0 100 83 17
PHF .000 .840 .840 .000 .727 .727 .885 .691 .845
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1895 of 3061 File Name : 03_IND_JACKSON_ARCO DWY_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: ARCO Driveway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Jackson Street
Southbound
ARCO Driveway
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 105 105 0 9 9 102 14 116 230
04:15 PM 0 88 88 0 12 12 113 20 133 233
04:30 PM 0 76 76 0 7 7 111 16 127 210
04:45 PM 0 83 83 0 9 9 86 27 113 205
Total 0 352 352 0 37 37 412 77 489 878
05:00 PM 1 79 80 0 15 15 114 18 132 227
05:15 PM 0 94 94 0 10 10 96 12 108 212
05:30 PM 0 96 96 0 7 7 103 9 112 215
05:45 PM 0 108 108 0 10 10 100 13 113 231
Total 1 377 378 0 42 42 413 52 465 885
Grand Total 1 729 730 0 79 79 825 129 954 1763
Apprch % 0.1 99.9 0 100 86.5 13.5
Total % 0.1 41.3 41.4 0 4.5 4.5 46.8 7.3 54.1
Jackson Street
Southbound
ARCO Driveway
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 1 79 80 0 15 15 114 18 132 227
05:15 PM 0 94 94 0 10 10 96 12 108 212
05:30 PM 0 96 96 0 7 7 103 9 112 215
05:45 PM 0 108 108 0 10 10 100 13 113 231
Total Volume 1 377 378 0 42 42 413 52 465 885
% App. Total 0.3 99.7 0 100 88.8 11.2
PHF .250 .873 .875 .000 .700 .700 .906 .722 .881 .958
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1896 of 3061 File Name : 03_IND_JACKSON_ARCO DWY_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: ARCO Driveway
Weather: Clear
Jackson Street
ARCO Driveway
Jackson Street
Thru
377
Left
1 Out In Total
455 378 833
Right
42 Left
0 Out Total In
53 42 95
Thru
413
Right
52 Out In Total
377 465 842
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:15 PM
+0 mins. 1 79 80 0 12 12 113 20 133
+15 mins. 0 94 94 0 7 7 111 16 127
+30 mins. 0 96 96 0 9 9 86 27 113
+45 mins. 0 108 108 0 15 15 114 18 132
Total Volume 1 377 378 0 43 43 424 81 505
% App. Total 0.3 99.7 0 100 84 16
PHF .250 .873 .875 .000 .717 .717 .930 .750 .949
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1897 of 3061 File Name : 04_IND_JACKSON_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Jackson Street
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 13 68 12 93 34 38 10 82 10 26 7 43 7 20 13 40 258 07:15 AM 12 98 14 124 55 49 8 112 12 31 6 49 10 19 16 45 330 07:30 AM 11 122 20 153 70 59 15 144 21 41 9 71 8 32 21 61 429 07:45 AM 20 100 24 144 56 66 11 133 30 37 14 81 7 40 38 85 443 Total 56 388 70 514 215 212 44 471 73 135 36 244 32 111 88 231 1460 08:00 AM 11 60 10 81 24 53 15 92 29 49 19 97 16 43 31 90 360 08:15 AM 9 65 6 80 33 47 8 88 28 41 23 92 14 55 38 107 367 08:30 AM 20 43 12 75 23 33 11 67 20 31 9 60 15 31 31 77 279 08:45 AM 20 56 12 88 29 46 22 97 36 40 14 90 15 37 11 63 338 Total 60 224 40 324 109 179 56 344 113 161 65 339 60 166 111 337 1344 Grand Total 116 612 110 838 324 391 100 815 186 296 101 583 92 277 199 568 2804 Apprch % 13.8 73 13.1 39.8 48 12.3 31.9 50.8 17.3 16.2 48.8 35 Total % 4.1 21.8 3.9 29.9 11.6 13.9 3.6 29.1 6.6 10.6 3.6 20.8 3.3 9.9 7.1 20.3 Jackson Street
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 11 122 20 153 70 59 15 144 21 41 9 71 8 32 21 61 429 07:45 AM 20 100 24 144 56 66 11 133 30 37 14 81 7 40 38 85 443 08:00 AM 11 60 10 81 24 53 15 92 29 49 19 97 16 43 31 90 360 08:15 AM 9 65 6 80 33 47 8 88 28 41 23 92 14 55 38 107 367 Total Volume 51 347 60 458 183 225 49 457 108 168 65 341 45 170 128 343 1599 % App. Total 11.1 75.8 13.1 40 49.2 10.7 31.7 49.3 19.1 13.1 49.6 37.3 PHF .638 .711 .625 .748 .654 .852 .817 .793 .900 .857 .707 .879 .703 .773 .842 .801 .902 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1898 of 3061 File Name : 04_IND_JACKSON_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Jackson Street
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Jackson Street
Right
60 Thru
347
Left
51 Out In Total
262 458 720
Right
49 Thru
225
Left
183
Out Total In
286 457 743
Left
108
Thru
168
Right
65 Out In Total
658 341 999
Left
45 Thru
170
Right
128
Total Out In
393 343 736
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 13 68 12 93 55 49 8 112 21 41 9 71 7 40 38 85
+15 mins. 12 98 14 124 70 59 15 144 30 37 14 81 16 43 31 90 +30 mins. 11 122 20 153 56 66 11 133 29 49 19 97 14 55 38 107 +45 mins. 20 100 24 144 24 53 15 92 28 41 23 92 15 31 31 77 Total Volume 56 388 70 514 205 227 49 481 108 168 65 341 52 169 138 359 % App. Total 10.9 75.5 13.6 42.6 47.2 10.2 31.7 49.3 19.1 14.5 47.1 38.4 PHF .700 .795 .729 .840 .732 .860 .817 .835 .900 .857 .707 .879 .813 .768 .908 .839 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1899 of 3061 File Name : 04_IND_JACKSON_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Jackson Street
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 41 51 11 103 27 44 17 88 26 71 31 128 29 76 27 132 451 04:15 PM 18 51 17 86 41 41 19 101 20 74 21 115 35 69 26 130 432 04:30 PM 18 48 9 75 23 41 27 91 27 77 23 127 29 62 28 119 412 04:45 PM 24 51 11 86 23 33 14 70 21 63 24 108 29 57 29 115 379 Total 101 201 48 350 114 159 77 350 94 285 99 478 122 264 110 496 1674 05:00 PM 19 59 5 83 39 43 16 98 26 88 22 136 28 62 22 112 429 05:15 PM 24 54 10 88 27 42 17 86 27 67 28 122 29 64 32 125 421 05:30 PM 25 58 10 93 26 40 16 82 16 68 33 117 35 67 50 152 444 05:45 PM 28 67 15 110 34 49 8 91 25 72 22 119 37 51 25 113 433 Total 96 238 40 374 126 174 57 357 94 295 105 494 129 244 129 502 1727 Grand Total 197 439 88 724 240 333 134 707 188 580 204 972 251 508 239 998 3401 Apprch % 27.2 60.6 12.2 33.9 47.1 19 19.3 59.7 21 25.2 50.9 23.9 Total % 5.8 12.9 2.6 21.3 7.1 9.8 3.9 20.8 5.5 17.1 6 28.6 7.4 14.9 7 29.3 Jackson Street
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Jackson Street
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 19 59 5 83 39 43 16 98 26 88 22 136 28 62 22 112 429 05:15 PM 24 54 10 88 27 42 17 86 27 67 28 122 29 64 32 125 421 05:30 PM 25 58 10 93 26 40 16 82 16 68 33 117 35 67 50 152 444 05:45 PM 28 67 15 110 34 49 8 91 25 72 22 119 37 51 25 113 433 Total Volume 96 238 40 374 126 174 57 357 94 295 105 494 129 244 129 502 1727 % App. Total 25.7 63.6 10.7 35.3 48.7 16 19 59.7 21.3 25.7 48.6 25.7 PHF .857 .888 .667 .850 .808 .888 .838 .911 .870 .838 .795 .908 .872 .910 .645 .826 .972 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1900 of 3061 File Name : 04_IND_JACKSON_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: Jackson Street
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Jackson Street
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Jackson Street
Right
40 Thru
238
Left
96 Out In Total
481 374 855
Right
57 Thru
174
Left
126
Out Total In
445 357 802
Left
94 Thru
295
Right
105
Out In Total
493 494 987
Left
129
Thru
244
Right
129
Total Out In
308 502 810
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 04:15 PM 05:00 PM 04:45 PM
+0 mins. 19 59 5 83 41 41 19 101 26 88 22 136 29 57 29 115 +15 mins. 24 54 10 88 23 41 27 91 27 67 28 122 28 62 22 112 +30 mins. 25 58 10 93 23 33 14 70 16 68 33 117 29 64 32 125 +45 mins. 28 67 15 110 39 43 16 98 25 72 22 119 35 67 50 152 Total Volume 96 238 40 374 126 158 76 360 94 295 105 494 121 250 133 504 % App. Total 25.7 63.6 10.7 35 43.9 21.1 19 59.7 21.3 24 49.6 26.4 PHF .857 .888 .667 .850 .768 .919 .704 .891 .870 .838 .795 .908 .864 .933 .665 .829 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1901 of 3061 File Name : 05_IND_W ARCO_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: West ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
West ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 4 4 81 2 83 0 42 42 129
07:15 AM 0 16 16 105 5 110 0 37 37 163
07:30 AM 0 15 15 124 10 134 0 51 51 200
07:45 AM 0 12 12 114 5 119 0 74 74 205
Total 0 47 47 424 22 446 0 204 204 697
08:00 AM 0 10 10 83 5 88 0 74 74 172
08:15 AM 0 11 11 71 6 77 0 86 86 174
08:30 AM 0 3 3 66 10 76 0 63 63 142
08:45 AM 0 9 9 89 7 96 0 69 69 174
Total 0 33 33 309 28 337 0 292 292 662
Grand Total 0 80 80 733 50 783 0 496 496 1359
Apprch % 0 100 93.6 6.4 0 100
Total % 0 5.9 5.9 53.9 3.7 57.6 0 36.5 36.5
West ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 15 15 124 10 134 0 51 51 200
07:45 AM 0 12 12 114 5 119 0 74 74 205
08:00 AM 0 10 10 83 5 88 0 74 74 172
08:15 AM 0 11 11 71 6 77 0 86 86 174
Total Volume 0 48 48 392 26 418 0 285 285 751
% App. Total 0 100 93.8 6.2 0 100
PHF .000 .800 .800 .790 .650 .780 .000 .828 .828 .916
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1902 of 3061 File Name : 05_IND_W ARCO_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: West ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
West ARCO Driveway
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Right
48 Left
0 Out In Total
26 48 74
Right
26 Thru
392
Out Total In
285 418 703
Left
0 Thru
285
Total Out In
440 285 725
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 0 16 16 105 5 110 0 74 74
+15 mins. 0 15 15 124 10 134 0 74 74
+30 mins. 0 12 12 114 5 119 0 86 86
+45 mins. 0 10 10 83 5 88 0 63 63
Total Volume 0 53 53 426 25 451 0 297 297
% App. Total 0 100 94.5 5.5 0 100
PHF .000 .828 .828 .859 .625 .841 .000 .863 .863
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1903 of 3061 File Name : 05_IND_W ARCO_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: West ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
West ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 12 12 79 7 86 0 149 149 247
04:15 PM 0 9 9 91 6 97 0 109 109 215
04:30 PM 0 9 9 79 3 82 0 107 107 198
04:45 PM 0 15 15 57 7 64 0 105 105 184
Total 0 45 45 306 23 329 0 470 470 844
05:00 PM 0 19 19 76 10 86 0 102 102 207
05:15 PM 0 9 9 80 6 86 0 117 117 212
05:30 PM 0 8 8 78 11 89 0 125 125 222
05:45 PM 0 14 14 80 9 89 0 104 104 207
Total 0 50 50 314 36 350 0 448 448 848
Grand Total 0 95 95 620 59 679 0 918 918 1692
Apprch % 0 100 91.3 8.7 0 100
Total % 0 5.6 5.6 36.6 3.5 40.1 0 54.3 54.3
West ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 19 19 76 10 86 0 102 102 207
05:15 PM 0 9 9 80 6 86 0 117 117 212
05:30 PM 0 8 8 78 11 89 0 125 125 222
05:45 PM 0 14 14 80 9 89 0 104 104 207
Total Volume 0 50 50 314 36 350 0 448 448 848
% App. Total 0 100 89.7 10.3 0 100
PHF .000 .658 .658 .981 .818 .983 .000 .896 .896 .955
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1904 of 3061 File Name : 05_IND_W ARCO_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: West ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
West ARCO Driveway
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Right
50 Left
0 Out In Total
36 50 86
Right
36 Thru
314
Out Total In
448 350 798
Left
0 Thru
448
Total Out In
364 448 812
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:15 PM 05:00 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 0 9 9 76 10 86 0 149 149
+15 mins. 0 9 9 80 6 86 0 109 109
+30 mins. 0 15 15 78 11 89 0 107 107
+45 mins. 0 19 19 80 9 89 0 105 105
Total Volume 0 52 52 314 36 350 0 470 470
% App. Total 0 100 89.7 10.3 0 100
PHF .000 .684 .684 .981 .818 .983 .000 .789 .789
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1905 of 3061 File Name : 06_IND_E ARCO_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: East ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
East ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 87 1 88 0 40 40 128
07:15 AM 0 2 2 106 0 106 0 37 37 145
07:30 AM 0 1 1 133 2 135 0 51 51 187
07:45 AM 0 2 2 116 0 116 0 73 73 191
Total 0 5 5 442 3 445 0 201 201 651
08:00 AM 0 0 0 89 1 90 0 75 75 165
08:15 AM 0 1 1 74 0 74 0 88 88 163
08:30 AM 0 2 2 73 0 73 0 63 63 138
08:45 AM 0 3 3 97 3 100 0 71 71 174
Total 0 6 6 333 4 337 0 297 297 640
Grand Total 0 11 11 775 7 782 0 498 498 1291
Apprch % 0 100 99.1 0.9 0 100
Total % 0 0.9 0.9 60 0.5 60.6 0 38.6 38.6
East ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 1 1 133 2 135 0 51 51 187
07:45 AM 0 2 2 116 0 116 0 73 73 191
08:00 AM 0 0 0 89 1 90 0 75 75 165
08:15 AM 0 1 1 74 0 74 0 88 88 163
Total Volume 0 4 4 412 3 415 0 287 287 706
% App. Total 0 100 99.3 0.7 0 100
PHF .000 .500 .500 .774 .375 .769 .000 .815 .815 .924
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1906 of 3061 File Name : 06_IND_E ARCO_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: East ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
East ARCO Driveway
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Right
4 Left
0 Out In Total
3 4 7
Right
3 Thru
412
Out Total In
287 415 702
Left
0 Thru
287
Total Out In
416 287 703
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 0 0 0 106 0 106 0 73 73
+15 mins. 0 1 1 133 2 135 0 75 75
+30 mins. 0 2 2 116 0 116 0 88 88
+45 mins. 0 3 3 89 1 90 0 63 63
Total Volume 0 6 6 444 3 447 0 299 299
% App. Total 0 100 99.3 0.7 0 100
PHF .000 .500 .500 .835 .375 .828 .000 .849 .849
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1907 of 3061 File Name : 06_IND_E ARCO_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: East ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
East ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 4 4 84 2 86 0 153 153 243
04:15 PM 0 3 3 88 2 90 0 109 109 202
04:30 PM 0 4 4 79 2 81 0 106 106 191
04:45 PM 0 1 1 63 2 65 0 103 103 169
Total 0 12 12 314 8 322 0 471 471 805
05:00 PM 0 2 2 82 4 86 0 101 101 189
05:15 PM 0 4 4 84 1 85 0 122 122 211
05:30 PM 0 3 3 80 1 81 0 127 127 211
05:45 PM 0 3 3 86 4 90 0 104 104 197
Total 0 12 12 332 10 342 0 454 454 808
Grand Total 0 24 24 646 18 664 0 925 925 1613
Apprch % 0 100 97.3 2.7 0 100
Total % 0 1.5 1.5 40 1.1 41.2 0 57.3 57.3
East ARCO Driveway
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Left Thru App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 2 2 82 4 86 0 101 101 189
05:15 PM 0 4 4 84 1 85 0 122 122 211
05:30 PM 0 3 3 80 1 81 0 127 127 211
05:45 PM 0 3 3 86 4 90 0 104 104 197
Total Volume 0 12 12 332 10 342 0 454 454 808
% App. Total 0 100 97.1 2.9 0 100
PHF .000 .750 .750 .965 .625 .950 .000 .894 .894 .957
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1908 of 3061 File Name : 06_IND_E ARCO_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: East ARCO Driveway
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
East ARCO Driveway
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Right
12 Left
0 Out In Total
10 12 22
Right
10 Thru
332
Out Total In
454 342 796
Left
0 Thru
454
Total Out In
344 454 798
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 0 4 4 82 4 86 0 153 153
+15 mins. 0 3 3 84 1 85 0 109 109
+30 mins. 0 4 4 80 1 81 0 106 106
+45 mins. 0 1 1 86 4 90 0 103 103
Total Volume 0 12 12 332 10 342 0 471 471
% App. Total 0 100 97.1 2.9 0 100
PHF .000 .750 .750 .965 .625 .950 .000 .770 .770
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1909 of 3061 File Name : 07_IND_GC_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: Golf Course Drive
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Golf Course Drive
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Golf Course Drive
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 4 86 0 90 7 0 3 10 3 31 5 39 139
07:15 AM 1 0 0 1 7 89 0 96 11 0 2 13 4 25 5 34 144
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 10 125 0 135 9 0 4 13 1 43 2 46 194
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9 113 0 122 4 0 3 7 4 49 8 61 190
Total 1 0 0 1 30 413 0 443 31 0 12 43 12 148 20 180 667 08:00 AM 1 0 2 3 6 81 0 87 6 1 5 12 3 66 3 72 174
08:15 AM 0 0 1 1 12 68 0 80 4 0 3 7 6 67 6 79 167
08:30 AM 1 2 1 4 7 61 3 71 11 0 8 19 3 38 12 53 147
08:45 AM 1 1 3 5 11 85 2 98 8 1 5 14 3 49 6 58 175
Total 3 3 7 13 36 295 5 336 29 2 21 52 15 220 27 262 663 Grand Total 4 3 7 14 66 708 5 779 60 2 33 95 27 368 47 442 1330 Apprch % 28.6 21.4 50 8.5 90.9 0.6 63.2 2.1 34.7 6.1 83.3 10.6 Total % 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.1 5 53.2 0.4 58.6 4.5 0.2 2.5 7.1 2 27.7 3.5 33.2 Golf Course Drive
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Golf Course Drive
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 10 125 0 135 9 0 4 13 1 43 2 46 194
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9 113 0 122 4 0 3 7 4 49 8 61 190
08:00 AM 1 0 2 3 6 81 0 87 6 1 5 12 3 66 3 72 174
08:15 AM 0 0 1 1 12 68 0 80 4 0 3 7 6 67 6 79 167
Total Volume 1 0 3 4 37 387 0 424 23 1 15 39 14 225 19 258 725 % App. Total 25 0 75 8.7 91.3 0 59 2.6 38.5 5.4 87.2 7.4 PHF .250 .000 .375 .333 .771 .774 .000 .785 .639 .250 .750 .750 .583 .840 .594 .816 .934 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1910 of 3061 File Name : 07_IND_GC_AVE 42_AM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: Golf Course Drive
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Golf Course Drive
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Golf Course Drive
Right
3 Thru
0 Left
1 Out In Total
15 4 19
Right
0 Thru
387
Left
37 Out Total In
241 424 665
Left
23 Thru
1 Right
15 Out In Total
56 39 95
Left
14 Thru
225
Right
19 Total Out In
413 258 671
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 1 0 2 3 4 86 0 90 6 1 5 12 4 49 8 61
+15 mins. 0 0 1 1 7 89 0 96 4 0 3 7 3 66 3 72
+30 mins. 1 2 1 4 10 125 0 135 11 0 8 19 6 67 6 79
+45 mins. 1 1 3 5 9 113 0 122 8 1 5 14 3 38 12 53
Total Volume 3 3 7 13 30 413 0 443 29 2 21 52 16 220 29 265 % App. Total 23.1 23.1 53.8 6.8 93.2 0 55.8 3.8 40.4 6 83 10.9 PHF .750 .375 .583 .650 .750 .826 .000 .820 .659 .500 .656 .684 .667 .821 .604 .839 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1911 of 3061 File Name : 07_IND_GC_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 1
City of Indio
N/S: Golf Course Drive
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Golf Course Drive
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Golf Course Drive
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 3 0 5 8 15 69 0 84 17 0 12 29 6 144 8 158 279
04:15 PM 1 0 2 3 17 79 1 97 8 1 10 19 7 90 6 103 222
04:30 PM 0 0 3 3 15 62 2 79 12 0 9 21 5 85 4 94 197
04:45 PM 1 1 1 3 9 54 1 64 7 0 11 18 6 84 4 94 179
Total 5 1 11 17 56 264 4 324 44 1 42 87 24 403 22 449 877 05:00 PM 0 0 2 2 15 72 1 88 10 1 11 22 8 90 7 105 217
05:15 PM 0 0 2 2 17 68 0 85 12 0 12 24 6 108 5 119 230
05:30 PM 1 1 1 3 7 70 1 78 9 1 16 26 4 108 9 121 228
05:45 PM 2 0 0 2 9 73 3 85 17 0 12 29 5 82 11 98 214
Total 3 1 5 9 48 283 5 336 48 2 51 101 23 388 32 443 889 Grand Total 8 2 16 26 104 547 9 660 92 3 93 188 47 791 54 892 1766 Apprch % 30.8 7.7 61.5 15.8 82.9 1.4 48.9 1.6 49.5 5.3 88.7 6.1 Total % 0.5 0.1 0.9 1.5 5.9 31 0.5 37.4 5.2 0.2 5.3 10.6 2.7 44.8 3.1 50.5 Golf Course Drive
Southbound
Avenue 42
Westbound
Golf Course Drive
Northbound
Avenue 42
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 0 0 2 2 15 72 1 88 10 1 11 22 8 90 7 105 217
05:15 PM 0 0 2 2 17 68 0 85 12 0 12 24 6 108 5 119 230
05:30 PM 1 1 1 3 7 70 1 78 9 1 16 26 4 108 9 121 228
05:45 PM 2 0 0 2 9 73 3 85 17 0 12 29 5 82 11 98 214
Total Volume 3 1 5 9 48 283 5 336 48 2 51 101 23 388 32 443 889 % App. Total 33.3 11.1 55.6 14.3 84.2 1.5 47.5 2 50.5 5.2 87.6 7.2 PHF .375 .250 .625 .750 .706 .969 .417 .955 .706 .500 .797 .871 .719 .898 .727 .915 .966 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1912 of 3061 File Name : 07_IND_GC_AVE 42_PM
Site Code : 23623516
Start Date : 5/18/2023
Page No : 2
City of Indio
N/S: Golf Course Drive
E/W: Avenue 42
Weather: Clear
Golf Course Drive
Avenue 42
Avenue 42
Golf Course Drive
Right
5 Thru
1 Left
3 Out In Total
30 9 39
Right
5 Thru
283
Left
48 Out Total In
442 336 778
Left
48 Thru
2 Right
51 Out In Total
81 101 182
Left
23 Thru
388
Right
32 Total Out In
336 443 779
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 3 0 5 8 15 72 1 88 10 1 11 22 6 144 8 158
+15 mins. 1 0 2 3 17 68 0 85 12 0 12 24 7 90 6 103
+30 mins. 0 0 3 3 7 70 1 78 9 1 16 26 5 85 4 94
+45 mins. 1 1 1 3 9 73 3 85 17 0 12 29 6 84 4 94
Total Volume 5 1 11 17 48 283 5 336 48 2 51 101 24 403 22 449 % App. Total 29.4 5.9 64.7 14.3 84.2 1.5 47.5 2 50.5 5.3 89.8 4.9 PHF .417 .250 .550 .531 .706 .969 .417 .955 .706 .500 .797 .871 .857 .700 .688 .710 Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1913 of 3061
EXISTING VOLUMES
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1914 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Base Volume
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1915 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Base Volume
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1916 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Base Volume
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1917 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Base Volume
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1918 of 3061
PROJECT VOLUMES
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1919 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1920 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1921 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1922 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1923 of 3061
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT VOLUMES
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1924 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1925 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1926 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1927 of 3061 Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1928 of 3061
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1929 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.008
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 18.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 1: Jackson St / Generations Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 90.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement U-tu Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Generations Generations
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 52 20 219 0 1 493 1 2 0 35 0 0 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 13 5 55 0 0 123 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.8430 1.0000 0.8430 0.8430 0.8430 1.0000 1.0000 0.8430 0.8430 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 52 20 219 0 1 493 1 2 0 35 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 52 9 18 0 0 19 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 11 201 0 1 474 1 2 0 25 0 0 0 Name Jackson Jackson Generations Generations
Volumes
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1930 of 3061 Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.51
Approach LOS A A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.90 0.02 10.55 14.72
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 10.01 10.01 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 4.27 4.27 4.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A A A A A C C B C C A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 12.69 9.17 0.00 0.00 7.67 0.00 0.00 18.87 19.23 10.08 16.33 18.94 8.90 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1931 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.007
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 18.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Jackson St / Shopping Center
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 140.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Shopping Center Shopping Center
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 28 204 74 10 568 2 2 0 16 1 0 91 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 7 51 19 3 142 1 1 0 4 0 0 23 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8510 1.0000 0.8510 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.8510 0.8510 0.8510 0.8510 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 24 204 63 10 568 2 2 0 14 1 0 91 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 -30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 25 33 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 24 209 0 10 487 2 2 0 14 1 0 1 Name Jackson Jackson Shopping Center Shopping Center
Volumes
3 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1932 of 3061 Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.33
Approach LOS A A B A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.80 0.00 11.15 9.54
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.30 2.30 2.30 0.00 0.00 8.58 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.34 Movement LOS A A A A A C C B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.43 18.62 10.24 0.00 0.00 9.54 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.10 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
4 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1933 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.080
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 3: Jackson St / ARCO Driveway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson ARCO
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 262 145 0 660 0 64
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 66 36 0 165 0 16
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8840 0.8840 1.0000 0.8840 1.0000 0.8840 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 232 128 0 583 0 57
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] -30 30 0 0 0 28
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 49 49 0 81 0 9
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 213 49 0 502 0 20
Name Jackson Jackson ARCO
Volumes
5 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1934 of 3061 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.56
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 9.87
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.47 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 Movement LOS A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.87 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.08
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
6 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1935 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.381
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 38.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Jackson St / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 50.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 220.00 100.00 100.00 115.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 315.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
7 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1936 of 3061 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 120 284 114 89 486 72 61 201 142 284 264 54 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 30 71 29 22 121 18 15 50 35 71 66 14 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 0.9020 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 108 256 103 80 438 65 55 181 128 256 238 49 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 88 38 29 47 5 10 10 0 73 13 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 108 168 65 51 391 60 45 171 128 183 225 49 Name Jackson Jackson Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
8 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1937 of 3061 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 31 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 0 29 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 11 46 0 13 48 0 13 50 0 21 58 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 130
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
9 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1938 of 3061 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 92.50 80.01 65.50 66.58 147.99 40.23 44.44 138.05 213.61 208.50 211.56 203.66 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.70 3.20 2.62 2.66 5.92 1.61 1.78 5.52 8.54 8.34 8.46 8.15 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 51.39 44.45 36.39 36.99 82.22 22.35 24.69 76.70 122.75 119.04 121.26 115.53 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.06 1.78 1.46 1.48 3.29 0.89 0.99 3.07 4.91 4.76 4.85 4.62 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Lane Group LOS E B B E B B E E E E D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 66.15 11.65 11.70 62.93 12.75 11.30 61.74 55.05 66.46 63.04 50.29 50.46 X, volume / capacity 0.72 0.15 0.13 0.55 0.25 0.08 0.40 0.53 0.84 0.85 0.55 0.55 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 5.61 0.16 0.32 2.83 0.32 0.19 1.72 1.15 10.38 6.04 1.56 1.69 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60.53 11.49 11.38 60.10 12.43 11.10 60.02 53.90 56.09 57.00 48.73 48.78 c, Capacity [veh/h] 168 1919 856 163 1914 854 151 380 169 334 298 281 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3113 3204 1431 3113 3204 1431 3113 3204 1431 3113 1683 1585 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.04 0.09 0.08 0.03 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.18 0.18 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 78 78 7 78 78 6 15 15 14 23 23 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C C
Lane Group Calculations
10 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1939 of 3061 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 66.15 11.65 11.70 62.93 12.75 11.30 61.74 55.05 66.46 63.04 50.36 50.46 Movement LOS E B B E B B E E E E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 24.28 19.49 60.07 56.35
Approach LOS C B E E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 38.41
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.381
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 56.32 56.32 56.32 56.32
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.878 2.807 2.813 2.717 Crosswalk LOS C C C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 646 677 708 831 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 29.79 28.45 27.14 22.22
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.987 2.093 1.893 2.056 Bicycle LOS A B A B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
11 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1940 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.073
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: West ARCO Driveway / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name West ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 52 0 396 540 28
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 13 0 99 135 7
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9160 1.0000 0.9160 0.9160 0.9160 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 48 0 363 495 26
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 76 86 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 48 0 287 409 26
Name West ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
12 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1941 of 3061 Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.53
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.45 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 10.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
13 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1942 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.167
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: East ARCO Driveway / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name East ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 128 0 393 434 40
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 32 0 98 108 10
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9240 1.0000 0.9240 0.9240 0.9240 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 118 0 363 401 37
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 28 0 0 -30 30
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 86 0 76 0 4
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 4 0 287 431 3
Name East ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
14 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1943 of 3061 Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.37
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.65 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 14.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 10.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
15 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1944 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.236
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 43.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Golf Course / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 85.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 205.00 175.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
16 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1945 of 3061 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 25 1 16 34 0 18 105 256 20 40 425 30 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 0 4 9 0 5 26 64 5 10 106 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9340 1.0000 0.9340 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9340 0.9340 0.9340 0.9340 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 23 1 15 34 0 18 105 239 19 37 397 30 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 15 0 15 15 -15 0 0 -15 15
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 18 0 0 76 0 0 0 4 15 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 23 1 15 1 0 3 14 254 19 37 408 0 Name Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
17 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1946 of 3061 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 29 0 0 10 0 0 23 0 0 23 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 19 38 0 11 30 0 19 39 0 12 32 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
18 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1947 of 3061 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 14.38 8.06 41.85 0.00 8.37 128.61 119.14 17.50 47.41 241.66 239.21 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.58 0.32 1.67 0.00 0.33 5.14 4.77 0.70 1.90 9.67 9.57 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 7.99 4.48 23.25 0.00 4.65 71.45 66.19 9.72 26.34 143.45 141.62 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.32 0.18 0.93 0.00 0.19 2.86 2.65 0.39 1.05 5.74 5.66 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes Lane Group LOS D B D A A E D C D D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 47.86 10.26 51.79 0.00 9.92 55.87 35.51 32.85 51.83 47.16 47.54 X, volume / capacity 0.22 0.02 0.48 0.00 0.02 0.80 0.41 0.07 0.52 0.83 0.84 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.98 0.05 5.04 0.00 0.05 10.69 0.42 0.11 5.30 6.57 6.92 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 46.88 10.21 46.76 0.00 9.87 45.18 35.09 32.75 46.53 40.58 40.62 c, Capacity [veh/h] 113 795 70 941 799 131 631 282 77 275 269 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3113 1443 1603 1683 1431 1603 3204 1431 1603 1683 1644 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.14 0.14 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.04 0.55 0.04 0.56 0.56 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.16 0.16 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 4 55 4 56 56 8 20 20 5 16 16 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Lane Group L C L C R L C R L C C
Lane Group Calculations
19 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1948 of 3061 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 47.86 10.26 10.26 51.79 0.00 9.92 55.87 35.51 32.85 51.83 47.33 47.54 Movement LOS D B B D A A E D C D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 32.64 37.30 40.98 47.71
Approach LOS C D D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 43.86
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.236
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 41.44 41.44 0.00 41.44
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.158 2.176 0.000 2.541 Crosswalk LOS B B F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 680 520 700 560 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 21.81 27.41 21.16 25.95
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.629 1.645 1.874 1.968 Bicycle LOS A A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
20 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1949 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.008
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 8: Jackson St / Project Driveway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Project Dwy
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 294 16 0 580 0 7
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 74 4 0 145 0 2
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 294 16 0 580 0 7
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 72 16 0 81 0 7
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 222 0 0 499 0 0
Name Jackson Jackson Project Dwy
Volumes
21 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1950 of 3061 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.07
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 9.21
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Movement LOS A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.21 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
22 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1951 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.005
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 9: Drive Aisle / Relocated Golf Course Parking Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 92 15 0 18 4 0
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 23 4 0 5 1 0
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 92 15 0 18 4 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 92 0 0 18 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 15 0 0 4 0
Name
Volumes
23 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1952 of 3061 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.28
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 9.12
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.34 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 Movement LOS A A A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 7.43 0.00 9.12 8.61 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
24 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 1: 1 AM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1953 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.010
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 17.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 1: Jackson St / Generations Dr
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 90.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement U-tu Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Generations Generations
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 34 27 428 0 1 324 7 0 0 23 3 0 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 9 7 107 0 0 81 2 0 0 6 1 0 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.9350 1.0000 0.9350 0.9350 0.9350 1.0000 1.0000 0.9350 0.9350 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 34 27 428 0 1 324 7 0 0 23 3 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 34 6 12 0 0 13 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 21 416 0 1 311 7 0 0 16 3 0 0 Name Jackson Jackson Generations Generations
Volumes
1 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1954 of 3061 Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 1.02
Approach LOS A A A C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.19 0.02 9.35 17.65
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 5.79 5.79 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 2.08 2.08 2.08 0.79 0.79 0.79 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.03 Movement LOS B A A A A A A C C A C C A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 10.61 8.27 0.00 0.00 8.19 0.00 0.00 16.35 18.75 9.35 17.65 18.82 9.68 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
2 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1955 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.016
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 20.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 2: Jackson St / Shopping Center
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 140.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Shopping Center Shopping Center
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 57 408 52 0 367 15 19 4 61 7 0 65 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 102 13 0 92 4 5 1 15 2 0 16 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9470 1.0000 0.9470 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9470 0.9470 0.9470 0.9470 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 54 408 49 0 367 15 19 4 58 7 0 65 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 -25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 17 23 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 54 416 1 0 313 15 19 4 58 7 0 2 Name Jackson Jackson Shopping Center Shopping Center
Volumes
3 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1956 of 3061 Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.11
Approach LOS A A B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.91 0.00 12.97 10.09
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 3.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.81 13.81 13.81 0.00 0.00 6.87 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.27 Movement LOS A A A A A C C B B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.76 20.84 10.64 0.00 0.00 10.09 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.08 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Settings
4 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1957 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.595
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 17.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 3: Jackson St / ARCO Driveway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson ARCO
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 456 116 0 450 0 423
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 114 29 0 112 0 106
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9580 0.9580 1.0000 0.9580 1.0000 0.9580 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 437 111 0 431 0 405
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] -25 25 0 0 0 22
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 33 34 0 54 0 6
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 429 52 0 377 0 377
Name Jackson Jackson ARCO
Volumes
5 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1958 of 3061 Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 5.04
Approach LOS A A C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 17.23
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.28 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.97 Movement LOS A A A C
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.23 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
6 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1959 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.304
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 37.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 4: Jackson St / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 50.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 220.00 100.00 100.00 115.00 100.00 100.00 185.00 100.00 315.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
7 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1960 of 3061 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 97 366 138 119 279 45 140 264 133 182 191 59 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 92 34 30 70 11 35 66 33 46 48 15 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 0.9720 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 94 356 134 116 271 44 136 257 129 177 186 57 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 61 26 20 30 4 7 7 0 48 8 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 94 295 108 96 241 40 129 250 129 129 178 57 Name Jackson Jackson Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
8 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1961 of 3061 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 31 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 0 29 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 11 46 0 13 48 0 21 48 0 13 40 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
9 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1962 of 3061 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 66.27 89.28 68.27 82.77 65.72 20.63 96.55 172.56 188.39 127.04 167.36 159.17 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.65 3.57 2.73 3.31 2.63 0.83 3.86 6.90 7.54 5.08 6.69 6.37 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 36.82 49.60 37.93 45.98 36.51 11.46 53.64 95.87 104.66 70.58 92.98 88.43 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.47 1.98 1.52 1.84 1.46 0.46 2.15 3.83 4.19 2.82 3.72 3.54 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No Lane Group LOS E B B E A A E D E E D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 57.77 10.03 10.01 59.46 9.62 9.04 60.10 53.87 60.92 60.32 52.27 52.79 X, volume / capacity 0.55 0.18 0.16 0.66 0.14 0.05 0.72 0.72 0.81 0.78 0.60 0.62 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.64 0.21 0.37 4.07 0.15 0.11 4.88 2.62 9.07 5.72 2.72 3.13 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 55.12 9.83 9.63 55.39 9.47 8.93 55.23 51.25 51.85 54.60 49.55 49.66 c, Capacity [veh/h] 177 1984 886 180 1988 888 195 368 164 232 213 197 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3113 3204 1431 3113 3204 1431 3113 3204 1431 3113 1683 1550 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.03 0.11 0.10 0.04 0.09 0.03 0.04 0.08 0.09 0.06 0.08 0.08 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.06 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.62 0.62 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.13 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 7 74 74 7 75 75 7 14 14 9 15 15 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C C
Lane Group Calculations
10 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1963 of 3061 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 57.77 10.03 10.01 59.46 9.62 9.04 60.10 53.87 60.92 60.32 52.44 52.79 Movement LOS E B B E A A E D E E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 17.73 22.95 57.24 55.81
Approach LOS B C E E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 37.59
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.304
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 51.35 51.35 51.35 51.35
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.831 2.796 2.811 2.700 Crosswalk LOS C C C B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 700 733 733 600 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 25.36 24.08 24.08 29.41
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.055 1.925 2.003 1.916 Bicycle LOS B A B A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
11 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1964 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.066
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: West ARCO Driveway / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name West ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 52 0 531 387 38
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 13 0 133 97 9
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9550 1.0000 0.9550 0.9550 0.9550 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 50 0 507 370 36
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 53 56 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 50 0 454 314 36
Name West ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
12 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1965 of 3061 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.51
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.86 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 5.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 9.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
13 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1966 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.114
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: East ARCO Driveway / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name East ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 94 0 530 327 40
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 24 0 132 82 10
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 0.9570 1.0000 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 90 0 507 313 38
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 22 0 0 -25 25
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 56 0 53 0 3
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 12 0 454 338 10
Name East ARCO Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
14 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1967 of 3061 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.94
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.91 0.00 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 9.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 9.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
15 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1968 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.210
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 44.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 7: Golf Course / Avenue 42
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 45.00 45.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 85.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 175.00 100.00 205.00 175.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Intersection Setup
16 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1969 of 3061 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 50 2 53 27 1 17 91 398 33 50 298 25 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 12 1 13 7 0 4 23 99 8 12 75 6 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9660 1.0000 0.9660 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.9660 0.9660 0.9660 0.9660 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 48 2 51 27 1 17 91 384 32 48 288 25 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 12 0 12 15 -15 0 0 -10 10
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 12 0 0 53 0 0 0 3 10 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 2 51 3 1 5 23 399 32 48 295 5 Name Avenue 42 Avenue 42
Volumes
17 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1970 of 3061 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 29 0 0 10 0 0 23 0 0 23 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 34 38 0 11 15 0 19 36 0 15 32 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 1 6 0 5 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 0.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD Yes
Intersection Settings
18 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1971 of 3061 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 28.10 23.28 33.65 0.42 7.34 113.58 210.10 31.38 59.53 179.77 177.62 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.12 0.93 1.35 0.02 0.29 4.54 8.40 1.26 2.38 7.19 7.10 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 15.61 12.93 18.69 0.23 4.08 63.10 120.20 17.43 33.07 99.87 98.68 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.62 0.52 0.75 0.01 0.16 2.52 4.81 0.70 1.32 3.99 3.95 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOS D A D A A E D D D D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 46.61 8.49 52.29 8.67 8.81 57.67 45.02 37.34 52.59 46.40 46.75 X, volume / capacity 0.30 0.06 0.45 0.00 0.02 0.80 0.83 0.15 0.59 0.73 0.74 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.02 0.14 5.15 0.00 0.04 11.90 3.73 0.33 6.28 4.65 4.95 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 45.59 8.34 47.14 8.67 8.76 45.77 41.29 37.01 46.30 41.75 41.80 c, Capacity [veh/h] 165 862 60 983 835 114 480 214 85 222 216 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3113 1438 1603 1683 1431 1603 3204 1431 1603 1683 1638 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.10 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.05 0.60 0.04 0.58 0.58 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.13 0.13 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 5 60 4 58 58 7 15 15 5 13 13 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Lane Group L C L C R L C R L C C
Lane Group Calculations
19 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1972 of 3061 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 46.61 8.49 8.49 52.29 8.67 8.81 57.67 45.02 37.34 52.59 46.56 46.75 Movement LOS D A A D A A E D D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 26.64 34.89 46.74 47.38
Approach LOS C C D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 44.44
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.210
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 41.42 41.42 0.00 41.42
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.176 2.171 0.000 2.555 Crosswalk LOS B B F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 680 220 640 560 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 21.80 39.62 23.14 25.94
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.733 1.634 1.990 1.867 Bicycle LOS A A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
20 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1973 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.007
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 8: Jackson St / Project Driveway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 40.00 40.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Jackson Jackson Project Dwy
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 484 11 0 382 0 5
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 121 3 0 96 0 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 484 11 0 382 0 5
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 47 11 0 54 0 5
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 437 0 0 328 0 0
Name Jackson Jackson Project Dwy
Volumes
21 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1974 of 3061 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.06
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 9.82
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Movement LOS A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.82 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
22 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1975 of 3061 Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.010
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 9.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 9: Drive Aisle / Relocated Golf Course Parking Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 25.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 63 30 0 12 9 0
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 16 8 0 3 2 0
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 63 30 0 12 9 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 63 0 0 12 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 30 0 0 9 0
Name
Volumes
23 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1976 of 3061 Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.71
Approach LOS A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 9.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.75 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 Movement LOS A A A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 7.40 0.00 9.00 8.59 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
24 TJW Engineering
6/13/2023
The Greens
Version 2022 (SP 0-2) Scenario 2: 2 PM
Generated with
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1977 of 3061 Appendix J
NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBAL CONSULTATION CORRESPONDENCE
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1978 of 3061 Dear Ms. Kendra Reif,
The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the The Greens project. The project area is not located within the boundaries of the ACBCI Reservation. However, it is within the Tribe’s Traditional Use Area. For this reason, the ACBCI THPO requests the following:
[VIA EMAIL TO:[email protected]]
City of Indio
Ms. Kendra Reif
100 Civic Center Mall
Indio, California 92201
August 28, 2023
Re: The Greens Indio Project
03-002-2023-015
*Formal government to government consultion under California Senate Bill 18 *Formal government to government consultion under California Assembly Bill No. 52 (AB-52).
*Copies of any cultural resource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with this project.
*A cultural resources inventory of the project area by a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities in this area.
*A copy of the records search with associated survey reports and site records from the information center.
*The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. *The presence of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of Interior's standards during any ground disturbing activities.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1979 of 3061 Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760) 883-1134. You may also email me at [email protected].
Cordially,
Claritsa Duarte
Cultural Resources Analyst
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
AGUA CALIENTE BAND
OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1980 of 3061 1 Boland, Heather
Subject: Multi-Tenant Commercial Retail Center Project
From: Lorrie Gregory <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 1:34 PM
To: Kendra Reif <[email protected]>
Subject: Multi-Tenant Commercial Retail Center Project
WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.
Good afternoon,
Thank you for reaching out to the Cahuilla Band of Indians regarding the development of the Multi-Tenant Commercial Retail Center Project, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Jackson St. This area is within the boundaries of traditional Cahuilla land use. Therefore, we would appreciate to be notified immediately if cultural resources are uncovered. We also request any cultural materials associated with the project (if any) for review. Thank you.
Respectfully,
Lorrie Gregory
Cultural Resource Coordinator
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Phone: 1 (760) 315-6839
Email: [email protected]
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1981 of 3061
TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
12700 Pumarra Road – Banning, CA 92220 – (951) 755-5259 – Fax (951) 572-6004 – [email protected]
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
[email protected]
Kendra Reif
Principal Planner
City of Indio
100 Civic Mall
Indio, CA 92201
September 26, 2023
Re: AB 52 Consultation for Retail Center on 6.12 acres, Indio, Riverside County, California The Morongo Band of Mission Indians (Tribe/MBMI) Tribal Historic Preservation Office received your letter regarding the above referenced Project. The proposed Project is not located within the boundaries of the ancestral territory or traditional use area of the Cahuilla and Serrano people of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
Thank you for notifying the MBMI about this project. MBMI encourages your consultation with tribes more closely associated with the lands upon which the project is located.
Respectfully,
Bernadette Ann Brierty
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
CC: Morongo THPO
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1982 of 3061 kimley‐horn.com 1100 Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Responses to Public Comments on The Greens Indio Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
Introduction
The purpose of this memo is to transmit the public comments and responses to these comments received on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for The Greens Indio Project located at the northeast corner of the Jackson Street at Avenue 42 intersection in the City of Indio. The Draft IS/MND was released for public review and comment by the City of Indio on October 6, 2023 for a public comment period ending on October 26, 2023.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15074, the City of Indio, as the Lead Agency, must consider the IS/MND together with any comments received during the public review process. Written responses have been prepared to written comments received during the public review period.
CEQA Requirements Regarding Comments and Responses
CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(b) states that “persons and public agencies should focus on the proposed finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. If persons and public agencies believe that the project may have a significant effect, they should:
1. Identify the specific effect,
2. Explain why they believe the effect would occur, and
3. Explain why they believe the effect would be significant.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(c) further advises, “Reviewers should explain the basis for their comments, and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064, an effect shall not be considered significant in the absence of substantial evidence.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(d) states, “Reviewing agencies or organizations should include with their comments the name of a contact person who would be available for later consultation if necessary. Each responsible agency and trustee agency shall focus its comments on environmental information germane to that agency’s statutory responsibility.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(e) states, “This section shall not be used to restrict the ability of reviewers to comment on the general adequacy of a document or of the lead agency to reject comments not focused as recommended by this section.”
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1983 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 List of Respondents
The following public agencies and individualssubmitted comments on the IS/MND as of close of the public review period on October 26, 2023.
Claritsa Duarte, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians – Cultural Resource Analyst Kim Freeburn, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Inland Deserts Region – Environmental Program Manager
Bruce T. Bauer, Esq., Slovac Baron Empey Murphey & Pinkney LLP – Attorney Responses to Comments
Responses have been provided to comments on significant environmental points in order to describe the disposition of issues and new information or clarifications, as appropriate. When comments did not address the completeness or adequacy of the environmental documentation, or did not raise significant environmental issues, the receipt of the comment is noted; no further response is provided. This section is formatted so that the respective comment letters are followed immediately by the corresponding responses.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1984 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Letter 1 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Claritsa Duarte
Cultural Resource Analyst
October 10, 2023
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1985 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1986 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Letter 1: Response 1A
As reported in the IS/MND, on January 18, 2023, a records search request was submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California, Riverside. As of October 2023, the results are pending. The IS/MND reported that it is unlikely that Native American tribal cultural resources are present on the project site, given prior site disturbance. Notwithstanding, Project construction would include limited excavation and grading. Therefore, there is the potential for the Project to affect previously unidentified Native American tribal cultural resources.
The IS/MND included MM CUL‐1 to reduce any significant impacts to unknown historic archeological and cultural resources to a less than significant level. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians have identified the project site as a potentially highly sensitive area. MM CUL‐1 has been modified to include language provided by the tribe. MM CUL‐1 has been revised as follows:
MM CUL‐1 Prior to issuance of any permit for ground‐disturbing activities, the Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Indio Community Development Department that a qualified professional archaeologist meeting Secretary of the Interior standards (Archaeologist) and an Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource monitor (Monitor) have been retained to supervise archaeological monitors during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing, surveys, grading and excavation activities). The selection of the qualified professional(s) shall be subject to the City’s acceptance. In the event that cultural resources (archaeological or historical) are inadvertently unearthed or encountered during excavation and grading activities, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt within 50 feet of the find and the Monitor shall notify the Archaeologist to investigate. Should the Archaeologist and/or Monitor have concerns that the find is potentially significant, the Archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan for review and approval by the City and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. the archaeologist shall request the contractor to immediately cease all earth‐disturbing activities within a 100‐foot radius of the area of discovery. The archaeologist and tribal monitor shall evaluate the significance of the finding and prescribe an appropriate course of action. If avoidance of the resource(s) is not feasible, salvage operation requirements pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 shall be followed. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1987 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Letter 2 California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Inland Desert Region Kim Freeburn
Environmental Program Manager
October 23, 2023
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1988 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1989 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1990 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1991 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1992 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1993 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1994 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1995 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1996 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1997 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1998 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 1999 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2000 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2001 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2002 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2003 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2004 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2005 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Letter 2: Response 2A
The IS/MND included MM BIO‐3 to reduce potential impacts to nesting migratory birds. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Inland Deserts Region (CDFW) provided recommendations to the City in order to further reduce potential impacts to nesting migratory birds. Therefore, MM BIO‐1 has been revised as follows:
MM BIO‐3 Nesting Migratory Birds. During construction, grubbing, brushing, or tree removal shall be conducted outside of the State‐identified peak nesting season for migratory birds (i.e., typically February 1 through August 31), if possible. Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground‐disturbing activities. Pre‐construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre‐construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Established buffers shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. If construction activities cannot be conducted outside of nesting season, a Pre‐construction Nesting Bird Survey within and adjacent to the Project shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within three days prior to initiating construction activities. If active nests are found during the Pre‐construction Nesting Bird Survey, a Nesting Bird Plan (NBP) shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and implemented during construction. At a minimum, the NBP shall include guidelines for addressing active nests, establishing buffers, monitoring, and reporting. The size and location of all buffersones, if required,shall be based on the nesting species, nesting sage, nest location, its sensitivity to disturbance, and intensity and duration of the disturbance activity.
Letter 2: Response 2B
The Project’s Biological and Aquatic Resources Constraints Assessment did not identify suitable habitat on the project site or surrounding areas for burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia). However, CDFW is concerned about the potential for burrowing owls to move into the project site between the time that the field assessments were last conducted (January 6, 2023, for the project site and August 18,
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2006 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 2023, for the off‐site improvement area as indicated in the Biological Assessment) and the start of Project construction activities. Therefore, CDFW recommends the inclusion of an additional mitigation measure to avoid potential impacts to the burrowing owl. The following mitigation measure, MM BIO‐4, has been added:
MM BIO‐4 Burrowing Owl Avoidance. Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed on the site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project Applicant shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing project activities.
The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is notin itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The project Applicant shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW review and approval.
Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of project‐related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing project activities.
Letter 2: Response 2C
The IS/MND indicated that western yellow bat (Lasiurus xanthinus) has a moderate potential for occurrence on the projectsite and includes MM BIO‐2 to reduce potential impactsto the western yellow bat habitat. CDFW provided recommendations to the City in order to further reduce impacts to the western yellow bat and their habitat. Therefore, MM BIO‐2 has been revised as follows:
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2007 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 MM BIO‐2 Pre Construction Survey. Prior to the initiation of project activities within suitable bat roosting habitat, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveysto determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by qualified biologists.
Surveysshall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Each survey shall consist of one dusk emergence survey (start one hour before sunset and last for three hours), followed by one pre‐dawn re‐entry survey (start one hour before sunrise and last for two hours), and one daytime visual inspection of all potential roosting habitat on the project site. Surveys shall be conducted within one 24‐hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering).
Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre‐dawn re‐entry surveys. If active hibernacula or maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area during preconstruction surveys, for maternity roosts, project construction will only occur outside of the maternity roosting season. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. A minimum 500‐foot no‐work buffer shall be provided around wintering roosts (hibernacula). The buffer shall not be reduced.
Project‐related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until the end of project construction and activities or until a qualified bat biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active. Project‐related construction and activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Construction activities including removal or trimming of palm trees shall be avoided to limit potential impacts to roosting/foraging habitat for special‐status bat species. If construction work including palm tree removal or trimming is required, then pre‐construction surveys for special‐status bat species shall be conducted by a qualified biologists no less than 7 days and no more than 14 days prior to any palm tree removal or construction activities.
Surveysshall be done during appropriate times of the day (e.g., dawn or dusk) to maximize detectability to determine if special‐status bat species are roosting near the work area.
Survey methodology may include visual surveys of bats (e.g., observation of bats during foraging period), inspection of suitable habitat, bat sign (e.g., guano), or use of ultrasonic detectors (e.g., Anabat, etc.). The type of survey will depend on the condition of the potential roosting habitat. If no bats are found, then no further study is required. If bat species are found to be roosting within 100 feet of the project impact area, a 100‐foot buffer zone will be established around the active roost. Construction activities shall not occur within the 100‐foot buffer zone. Construction‐related lighting shall not occur within the 100‐foot buffer zone. Combustion equipment, such as generators, pumps, and vehicles are not to be parked nor operated within the 100‐foot buffer zone. Construction
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2008 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 personnel shall not enter the 100‐foot buffer zone. If the active roost is in a tree identified for removal, the tree removal shall be delayed until a qualified biologist determined the roost to no longer be active.
The IS/MND noted that existing landscape vegetation would be removed except for the palm trees in the existing Indio Municipal Golf Course parking lot and no street trees in the public rights‐of‐way would be removed. However, the Project would remove other trees that have the potential to support nesting migratory birds. CDFW reported that palm trees, bush seepweed scrub (Suaeda nigra), disturbed allscale scrub (Atriplex polycarpa), and honey mesquite thickets (Prosopsis glandulosa) may support roosting habitat and maternity groups for western yellow bats. Therefore, CDFW recommends the inclusion of an additional mitigation measure to further reduce impacts to the western yellow bat. The following mitigation measure, MM BIO‐5, has been added:
MM BIO‐5 Avoidance of Bats During Tree Removal. Tree removal work with the potential to house roosting bats shall be performed between September 15 and October 31 to minimize direct impacts to roosting bats. This time period is after young are volant (flying) but before expected onset of torpor (wintering inactivity). Tree removal work may also be conducted between February 15 and March 31, following winter torpor and prior to the start of the maternity season. No tree removals shall occur during the hibernation season, which typically begins in November or December (depending on weather conditions) and continues through mid‐February, due to the high potential for mortality of hibernating bats. Depending on weather conditions and the best professional judgement of a qualified bat biologist approved by CDFW, tree removal work may be performed in November if the forecasted nighttime low temperatures on the evening of removal and the subsequent four evenings do not drop below 45°F. In November, if weather is cold (i.e., forecasted nighttime low temperatures reach 45°F or less for that evening and the next four evenings), then no tree removals shall be performed. All tree removals shall require a two‐step removal process and the involvement of a CDFW‐approved qualified bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. The following two‐step tree removal process shall be implemented over two consecutive days: on Day 1, live palm fronds located above the frond skirt, and as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a qualified bat biologist.
Letter 2: Response 2D
CDFW raised concerns regarding the Project’s lighting specifications because the project site “is located adjacent to open‐space areas including a golf course – areas that provide suitable nesting, roosting, foraging, and refugia habitat for birds, migratory birds that fly at night, bats, and other nocturnal and crepuscular wildlife.” However, the adjacent golf course, also referred to as “The Lights at Indio Golf
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2009 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Course,” is Coachella Valley’s only night lit golf course and operates from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.1 In addition to night lighting for the golf course, the facility also includes a night‐lit driving range, and putting and chipping areas. Therefore, the adjacent 18‐hole golf course serves as a substantialsource of night lighting, rather than a sensitive receptor that would be potentially impacted by limited artificial nighttime lighting from the project site. The project site is bordered on all sides with uses that include multiple nighttime lighting sources.
As reported in the IS/MND, the Project would be required to comply with General Plan Policy CE-7.8 and Policy LU-3.5 which would ensure that new light sources associated with the Project are shielded and directed away from open viewing space areas and do not adversely affect day or nighttime views.
Additionally, IUDC Section 3.02.11 sets regulations for outdoor lighting on all properties in the City to minimize light pollution.2 Regulations include height restrictions and shielding requirements to minimize undesirable light into the night sky, and to protect the natural environment from the adverse effects of night lighting from gas or electric sources. Finally, the proposed Project would be subject to compliance with a Condition of Approval (COA) that requires a lighting plan.
Impacts would be less than significant and the recommended mitigation from CDFW (MM BIO‐C: Artificial Nighttime Lighting) is not required because the existing night‐lit golf course cannot be characterized as a dark open space area.
Letter 2: Response 2E
The IS/MND indicated that landscaping will be installed around the project site perimeter, building frontages, and parking areas and would incorporate typical desert climate plants. CDFW provided recommendations to incorporate water‐wise concepts in the Project landscape design plans. Particularly, CDFW recommends that the IS/MND include recommendations regarding landscaping from Section 4.0 of the CVMSHCP “Table 4‐112: Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping”.
While the IS/MND does not mandate that the Project landscape plans include landscaping recommendations from Section 4.0 of the CVMSHCP “Table 4‐112: Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping”, the Project would be required to comply with Municipal Code Section
54.064.1 – Landscape and Water Conservation, Section 54.064.2 – Water Efficient Landscape Development Standards, and all landscaping would be drought tolerant. Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with IUDC Section 3.02.09 – Landscaping.
Further, the Project would be required to pay CVMSHCP Section 5.2.1.1, Local Development Mitigation Fees to mitigate impacts to the sensitive natural communities from construction of the off‐site improvements. However, since construction of the off‐site improvements would not be considered a 1 Indio Municipal Golf Course. (2023). The Lights at Indio Municipal Golf Course. Retrieved from: https://www.indiogolf.com/; accessed October 2023. 2
IUDC Section 3.02.11.D: Dark‐Sky Compliance. In accordance with the International Dark‐Sky Association recommendations, the color temperature of outdoor lighting shall not exceed 3,000 Kelvins.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2010 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Covered Activity located outside of and not directly adjacent to designated Conservation Areas, no additional regulatory measures are required for compliance with the CVMSHCP.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2011 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Letter 3 SBEMP Attorneys representing Indio Residents for Open Space Bruce T. Bauer, Esq.
October 26, 2023
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2012 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2013 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2014 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2015 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2016 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2017 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2018 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Letter 3: Response 3A
The letter from SBEMP Attorneys on behalf of Indio Residents for Open Space addresses the following concerns:
Parcel Exchange (referred to by the commenter as the “Land Swap Agreement”) Proposed amendment to the General Plan land use designation and rezone of property Aesthetics Analysis
Air Quality Analysis
Greenhouse Gas Analysis
Need for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) General Plan Amendment and Rezone
As background, the City of Indio adopted the General Plan 2040 on September 18, 2019 and adopted new citywide zoning regulations referred to as the “Unified Development Code,” which became effective on October 22, 2022. Unrelated to the proposed Project, the City has determined that there were mapping errors on the Zoning Map on property owned by the applicant (Can Do LLC), which became known when development was proposed by the applicant. Corrections to these maps would have been made by the City apart from the Project. Because the applicant proposed development of the retail uses on the site, these land use amendments and rezones are included in the entitlements.
As it applies to the currently proposed Project, the following corrections and clarifications are provided to the commenter regarding the existing General Plan designation and zoning district for the project site.
Existing General Plan Regional Commercial (~5.84 ac) Parks and Open Space (~0.28 ac)
Proposed General Plan Regional Commercial (~6.12 ac) Existing Zoning Regional Commercial (~4.45 ac)
Parks and Open Space (~1.67 ac)
Proposed Zoning Regional Commercial (~6.12 ac)
In summary, the proposed Projectrequires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation on approximately 0.28 acre to Regional Commercial. With respect to zoning, a rezone of 1.67 acres is proposed such that property that has a General Plan designation of Regional Commercial and is zoned Parks and Open Space to be rezoned in order that the General Plan and zoning is consistent. Additionally, that portion of the property that is proposed for a General Plan Amendment from Regional Commercial to Parks and Open Space would also be rezoned.
Assuch, this change is not a substantial loss of designated Parks and Open Space. The property is not used as park land. It is a part of the existing golf course parking lot and a strip of land generally along a portion of the northern and eastern project site boundary.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2019 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Parcel Exchange
On November 1, 2023, the City of Indio City Council approved Resolution No. 10402 approving a parcel exchange and easement agreement between the City and Can Do LLC, both property owners. Exhibit D from the staff report depicts the exchange parcels. As excerpted from the November 1, 2023 City of Indio Staff Report, “The approval of this resolution and agreement would: allow for the execution of a lot line adjustment to exchange City parcels for Developer Parcels, outline the future development of a new parking lot for the Golf Course and delineate the negotiation of future easements and their use and location.” “Developer will convey the Developer Exchange Parcel to the City in exchange for the conveyance of the City Exchange Parcel to Developer to facilitate the Development Project on Developer's property, (such transaction hereafter referred to as the “Parcel Exchange”). This Parcel Exchange is a true one‐for‐one exchange, the parcels which the Developer would receive are 23,950 square feet, and in similar location(s) as the parcels which the City will be receiving, which also comprise 23,950 square feet.
As such there will not be any exchange of monies for the parcels; and since the exchange is for parcels of approximately equal value, the Parcel Exchange does not constitute a gift of public funds.” While the staff report acknowledges that the applicant is proposing commercial retail uses on a portion of a 6.12‐acre property subject to the parcel exchange and easement agreement, the staff report clearly states “that action does not constitute an approval the Development Project or any elements thereof.
Such an action exclusively approves the exchange of the subject parcels and the subsequent negotiation and approval of the easements described in the Agreement.” The staff report also notes that “The parcels the City is receiving pursuant to this exchange further the City's goal of reconfiguring the maintenance yard for the Golf Course. The Parcel Exchange would enable the Development Project and the Agreement further outlines the construction of a new parking lot for the City's Golf Course by the Developer.” As a point of clarification to the commenter, the City’s maintenance facility is not a part of the proposed Project. Should any future modificationsto this property be proposed by the City, such modifications would be subject to separate CEQA review. With respect to the municipal golf course parking lot, this is a capital improvement project proposed to be included in the City’s next Capital Improvement Program and would be subject to CEQA review. Lastly, as noted in part in Resolution No. 10402 for the Parcel Exchange, it is noted that the City’s parcels are not park land and have not been used for park land.
CEQA and Legal Requirements
The commenter suggests that the Project would have significant impacts with respect to the topics of Air Quality and Aesthetics. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(b) states, “In reviewing negative declarations, persons and public agencies should focus on the proposed finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. If persons and public agencies believe that the project may have a significant effect, they should: (1) Identify the specific effect, (2) Explain why they believe the effect would occur, and (3) Explain why they believe the effect would be significant.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(c) “Reviewers should explain the basis for their comments, and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2020 of 3061
kimley‐horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 the comments. Pursuant to Section 15064, an effect shall not be considered significant in the absence of substantial evidence.”
With respect to Air Quality, Aesthetics and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, the commenter provides no evidence that the significant air quality, aesthetic, or GHG emissions impacts would occur based on the significance criteria set forth in the Initial Study. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15384, argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative does not constitute substantial evidence.
The commenter suggests that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required, in part, because the Project would result in inconsistencies with the General Plan and would have significant impactsthat were not identified. As noted, the commenter has provided no evidence that the analysis or conclusions of the Mitigated Negative Declaration are not correct. Asit appliesto the asserted loss of open space, the Project requires approximately 0.28 acre to be redesignated from Parks and Open Space to Regional Commercial.
This does not represent a substantial loss of open space which would preclude the City’s consideration of this land use change that would result in a mandatory provision of the General Plan. The Initial Study, inclusive of technicalstudies,supportsthe findingsthat the proposed Project will have lessthan significant impacts with the implementation of mitigation measures. Therefore, substantial evidence has not been presented by the commenter to support the assertion that an EIR is required.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2021 of 3061 Source: City of Indio, General Plan Map, 2022.
Existing General Plan Land Use Designation Jackson Street Avenue 42
Project Site
Offsite Improvements
and Entitlements
LEGEND
General Plan Land Use Designations
Suburban Neighborhood
Parks and Open Space
Regional Commercial
Workplace Employment District
Project Site
Offsite Improvements
and Entitlements
LEGEND
General Plan Land Use Designations
Suburban Neighborhood
Parks and Open Space
Regional Commercial
Workplace Employment District
Project Site
Source: City of Indio, Zoning Map, 2023.
Existing Zoning Designations
Jackson Street
Avenue 42
Project Site
Project Site
Offsite Improvements
and Entitlements
LEGEND
Zoning Designations
Regional Commercial
Parks and Open Space
Suburban Neighborhood High
Light Industrial
Specific Plan/Master Plan
The Greens – Indio
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2023 1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that when a public agency completes an environmental document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring plan. The reporting or monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, Table 1: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist, has been prepared for The Greens – Indio Project (Project). This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist is intended to provide verification that all applicable Mitigation Measures relative to significant environmental impacts are monitored and reported. Monitoring will include: 1) verification that each Mitigation Measure has been implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each Mitigation Measure; and 3) retention of records in the City of Indio The Greens – Indio Project file.
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) delineates responsibilities for monitoring the Project, but also allows the City flexibility and discretion in determining how best to monitor implementation. Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation measure.
Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation measures were implemented. This includes the review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition, unless otherwise noted in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist (Table 1). If an adopted mitigation measure is not being properly implemented, the designated monitoring personnel shall require corrective actions to ensure adequate implementation.
Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and generally involves the following steps:
- The City distributes reporting forms to the appropriate entities for verification of compliance. - Departments/agencies with reporting responsibilities will review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified mitigation measures.
- Problems or exceptions to compliance will be addressed to the City as appropriate. - Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance of mitigation measures.
- Responsible parties provide the City with verification that monitoring has been conducted and ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. - Monitoring compliance may be documented through existing review and approval programs such as field inspection reports and plan review.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2024 of 3061 The Greens – Indio
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2023 2
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2025 of 3061 The Greens – Indio
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2023 3
Verification of Compliance
Number Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility Implementation Timing
Monitoring/Reporting
Methods
Responsible for
Approval/Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
MM BIO-1 Prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activities, a qualified biologist shall survey the offsite improvement area to determine the presence of any sensitive natural communities. If any sensitive natural communities are identified within the off-site improvement area, the qualified biologist shall demarcate the limits of avoidance with construction fencing such that no work activity occurs within the fenced area containing the sensitive natural communities. This fencing shall remain in-place until all construction within the off-site improvement area is complete.
Qualified Biologist to be
retained by the Project
Applicant
Prior to initiation of any
ground disturbing
activities within the offsite improvements area.
Pre-construction survey of
the off-site improvements
area.
Demarcate limits of
avoidance, if necessary.
Approval: City of Indio
Planning Division
Monitoring: Qualified
Biologist
MM BIO-2 Prior to the initiation of project activities within suitable bat roosting habitat, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveys to determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by qualified biologists. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Each survey shall consist of one dusk emergence survey (start one hour before sunset and last for three hours), followed by one pre-dawn re-entry survey (start one hour before sunrise and last for two hours), and one daytime visual inspection of all potential roosting habitat on the project site. Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre-dawn re-entry surveys. If active hibernacula or maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area during preconstruction surveys, for maternity roosts, project construction shall occur outside of the maternity roosting season. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. A minimum 500- foot no-work buffer shall be provided around wintering roosts (hibernacula). The buffer shall not be reduced. Project-related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until the end of project construction and activities or until a qualified bat biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active.
Project-related construction and activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise.
Qualified Biologist to be
retained by the Project
Applicant
Pre-construction focused
bat surveys: Prior to
initiation of project
activities within suitable
bat roosting habitat, two
(2) spring surveys (AprilJune) and two (2) winter
surveys (November –
January) shall be
performed. Surveys shall
be conducted during
favorable weather
conditions only. Each
survey shall consist of one
dusk emergence survey
(start one hour before
sunset and last for three
hours), followed by one
pre-dawn re-entry survey
(start one hour before
sunrise and last for two
hours), and one daytime
visual inspection of all
potential roosting habitat
on the project site.
Surveys shall be
conducted within one 24-
hour period.
If pre-construction
focused bat surveys
identify active hibernacula
or maternity roosts in the
work area or 500 feet
extending from the work
area during
preconstruction surveys:
for maternity roosts,
project construction shall
only occur outside of the
maternity roosting season.
Retention of a qualified
biologist.
Pre-construction focused
bat surveys.
A minimum 500-foot nowork buffer shall be
provided around wintering
roosts (hibernacula), if
necessary.
Approval: City of Indio
Planning Division
Monitoring: Qualified
Biologist
MM BIO-3 During construction, grubbing, brushing, or tree removal shall be conducted outside of the peak Qualified Avian Biologist to No more than 3 days prior Nesting bird surveys Approval: City of Indio
The Greens – Indio
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2023 4
Verification of Compliance
Number Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility Implementation Timing
Monitoring/Reporting
Methods
Responsible for
Approval/Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
nesting season for migratory birds (i.e., typically February 1 through August 31), if possible.
Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. Preconstruction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Established buffers shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. be retained by the Project
Applicant
to vegetation removal or
ground-disturbing
activities.
In the event an active nest is
found, a qualified biologist
shall establish an
appropriate buffer around
the nest until the young
have fledged or the project
is completed. Nest buffers
are species specific and shall
be at least 300 feet for
passerines and 500 feet for
raptors.
Planning Division
Monitoring: Qualified avian
biologist
MM BIO-4 Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed on the site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project Applicant shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Project Applicant shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW review and approval.
Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing project activities.
Qualified Biologist to be
retained by the Project
Applicant
Burrowing Owl Focused
Surveys: Prior to
vegetation removal or
ground-disturbing
activities.
Burrowing Owl PreConstruction Surveys: No
less than 14 days prior to
start of construction
activities and within 24
hours prior to ground
disturbance.
Focused burrowing owl
survey.
Pre-construction burrowing
owl survey.
Preparation of a Burrowing
Owl Plan to be approved by
CDFW, if necessary.
Approval: City of Indio
Planning Division and
CDFW
Monitoring: Qualified
biologist
MM BIO-5 Tree removal work with the potential to house roosting bats shall be performed between September 15 and October 31 to minimize direct impacts to roosting bats. This time period is after young are volant (flying) but before expected onset of torpor (wintering inactivity). Tree removal work may also be conducted between February 15 and March 31, following winter torpor and prior to the start of the maternity season. No tree removals shall occur during the hibernation season, which typically begins in November or December (depending on weather conditions) and continues through mid-February, due to the high potential for mortality of hibernating bats. Depending on weather conditions and the best professional judgement of a qualified bat biologist approved by CDFW approve qualified
Biologist to be retained by
the Project Applicant
Tree removal: Between
September 15 and
October 31 and/or
between February 15 and
March 31.
Two-step tree removal
process: Implement over
All tree removal shall
involve the CDFW-approved
qualified bat biologist and
must follow the two-step
tree removal process.
Approval: City of Indio
Planning Division
Monitoring: CDFWapproved qualified bat
biologist
The Greens – Indio
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2023 5
Verification of Compliance
Number Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility Implementation Timing
Monitoring/Reporting
Methods
Responsible for
Approval/Monitoring Initials Date Remarks
CDFW, tree removal work may be performed in November if the forecasted nighttime low temperatures on the evening of removal and the subsequent four evenings do not drop below 45°F. In November, if weather is cold (i.e., forecasted nighttime low temperatures reach 45°F or less for that evening and the next four evenings), then no tree removals shall be performed. All tree removals shall require a two-step removal process and the involvement of a CDFW-approved qualified bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. The following two-step tree removal process shall be implemented over two consecutive days: on Day 1, live palm fronds located above the frond skirt, and as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a qualified bat biologist.
two consecutive days.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM CUL-1 Prior to issuance of any permit for ground-disturbing activities, the Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Indio Community Development Department that a qualified professional archaeologist meeting Secretary of the Interior standards (Archaeologist) and an Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource monitor (Monitor) have been retained to supervise archaeological monitors during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing, surveys, grading and excavation activities). The selection of the qualified professional(s) shall be subject to the City’s acceptance. In the event that cultural resources (archaeological or historical) are inadvertently unearthed or encountered during excavation and grading activities, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt within 50 feet of the find and the Monitor shall notify the Archaeologist to investigate. Should the Archaeologist and/or Monitor have concerns that the find is potentially significant, the Archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan for review and approval by the City and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume.
Project Applicant Prior to issuance of any
ground disturbing
activities permit.
Written verification that a
qualified archaeologist and
Agua Caliente Native
American Cultural Resource
Monitor have been
retained.
Proof of Native American
monitoring during grounddisturbing activities.
If cultural resources are
discovered, establish a 50-
foot buffer around
discovery. Investigate the
find and determine
appropriate course of
action.
Approval: City of Indio
Planning Division and Agua
Caliente Tribal Historic
Preservation Office.
Monitoring: A qualified
archaeologist (meeting
Secretary of the Interior
Standards) and an Agua
Caliente Native American
Cultural Resource Monitor
GEOLOGY/SOILS
MM GEO-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City shall review all project plans for grading, foundation, structural, infrastructure, and all other relevant construction permits to ensure compliance with the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation recommendations.
City of Indio Prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
Verify project plan
compliance with the
Geotechnical Engineering
Investigation
recommendations.
Approval: City of Indio
Building and Safety Division
MM GEO-2 Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit or permit for ground disturbance activities, the Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Indio Community Development Department’s Building and Safety Division that the Project Applicant has retained a qualified professional paleontologist. The selection of the qualified professional(s) shall be subject to City acceptance. In the event that paleontological are inadvertently unearthed during excavation and grading activities of any future development project, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery. The qualified professional shall be contacted to evaluate the significance of the finding and determine an appropriate course of action. If avoidance of the resource(s) is not feasible, the Project Applicant shall follow salvage operation requirements pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.
After the Project Applicant has appropriately avoided or mitigated the find, work in the area may resume.
Project Applicant Prior to issuance of the
first grading permit or
permit for ground
disturbance activities.
Written verification that
qualified paleontologist has
been retained.
If paleontological resources
are discovered, cease earth
disturbing activities within a
100-foot radius of the
discovery. Paleontologist to
evaluate the significance of
the find and determine an
appropriate course of
action.
Approval: City of Indio
Building and Safety Division
Monitoring: Qualified
paleontologist
N.A.P. EXISTING AUTO PARTS & SERVICE N.A.P. EXISTING GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE, & CAR WASH AVENUE 42
JACKSON STREET BLDG 1 D/T REST. 6) 24 29 65' 24 15 2411 2 TE BLDG 4 D/T REST. 6) 28 5 2 4 3 BLDG 2 REST.
6) 12 COVERED PATIO 6) 60' 50'
75' 80 GOLF COURSE STALLS (NOT INCLUDED IN PARKING CALCULATIONS) 12 13 7 2 TE BLDG 3 D/T REST. 6) 9 5 18 13 10 9 64'-5"
84'-9" SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE 12 12 5 8 1 D/T LENGTH: 186'-9" D/T LENGTH: 253'-2" D/T LENGTH: 492'-2" 1 T NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 INDIO, CALIFORNIA SITE PLAN Scale: 1" = 40' September 18, 2023 P:\16\16430 - Indio, NEC Jackson & Ave 42\Design\Site\x16430 - Site Plan.dwg B I C K E L G R O U P A R C H I T E C T U R E BIC K E L GR O U P IN C O RPO RAT E D 3600 BIR C H S TRE E T, S U IT E 120 N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0 P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511 w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m NORTH SITE INFORMATION APN: 692-670-001, 692-670-014, 692-670-017 TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 6) $&
TOTAL BLDG AREA: 6) FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): PROJECT SITE 143 AVENUE 42 JACKSON ST PARKING INFORMATION PARKING RATIO: 6) TOTAL EV CAPABLE STALLS REQUIRED: 48 (20% OF TOTAL STALLS PER CGBC 2022 CH 5.106.5.3) TOTAL EVCS STALLS REQUIRED: 12 (25% OF EC CAPABLE STALLS PER CGBC 2022 CH
5.106.3.3) TOTAL SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED: 11 RACKS (5% OF VISITOR STALLS* PER CGBC 2022 CH5.106.4) TOTAL LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED: 2 LOCKERS (5% OF TENANT TOTAL STALLS* PER CGBC 2022CH 5.106.4) *ASSUME 90% OF STALLS ARE VISITOR STALLS , AND 10% OF STALLS ARE TENANT STALLS BUILDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PARKING PROPOSED PARKING BLDG 1 GREATER OF: 1 SPACE / 3 SEATS OR 6 SPACES / 1,000 SF, PLUS 1 PER 150 SF OF OUTDOOR DINING AND SEATING AREA OVER 450 SF 24 46 BLDG 2 GREATER OF: 1 SPACE / 3 SEATS OR 6 SPACES / 1,000 SF, PLUS 1 PER 150 SF OF OUTDOOR DINING AND SEATING AREA OVER 450 SF 43 116 BLDG 3 GREATER OF: 1 SPACE / 3 SEATS OR 6 SPACES / 1,000 SF, PLUS 1 PER 150 SF OF OUTDOOR DINING AND SEATING AREA OVER 450 SF 32 64 BLDG 4 1 SPACE / EMPLOYEE PLUS 2 SPACES FOR PICKUP 16 14 PROJECT TOTAL 115 240 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2029 of 3061 Table A
Section 159.666 Section A-1 Calculations
Total Parking
Lot Area
*Parking Lot
Landscape
**Parking Lot
Interior Landscape
***Parking Lot Exterior
Landscape
112,276 sq. ft. 40,555 sq. ft.
36.1% of the total
parking lot area
13,554 sq. ft.
33.4% of the parking
lot landscape area
27,011 sq. ft.
66.6% of the parking
lot landscape area
Table B
Section 159.666 Section A-1 Calculations
Total Parking Stalls Parking Lot Trees Required* Parking Lot Trees Provided
322 Parking Stalls 81 Trees 99 Trees
Secondary
Entry Wall and
Planted Berm
Perimeter Wall and
Planted Berm
Two Existing
Power Poles and
Overhead Power
Lines to be
Underground
Existing Entry to
Remain
Existing Entry to
Remain
Existing Entry to Remain
Secondary Entry Wall
and Planted Berm
Perimeter Wall and
Planted Berm
Primary Entry Wall
and Planted Berm
Primary Entry Wall
Entry Tree Grove
6’-0” H. Planted Berm
Trash Enclosure
Trash Enclosure
Perimeter Hedge
Golf Cart Temporary
Parking Area
Golf Course Cart Path
Connection with Gate
Existing Palms
to Remain
Restaurant Patio
Golf Course Pedestrian
Connection with Gate
Proposed Golf Course
Perimeter Fence
Dining Patio
with Amenities
THE GREENS INDIO | Landscape Entitlement Drawings
Date: 09.07.2023 L0.01
Client:
Frontier Real Estate Investments
31791 Los Rios Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
92651-2453 United States
Landscape Architect:
Project Location: Avenue 42 and Jackson Street
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN & CITY OF INDIO NOTES & CALCULATIONS
1. A minimum of 15% of the total off-street open parking area shall be landscaped with a mixture of trees, shrubs, ground cover, other plant material and hardscape material. A minimum of 1/3 of the required landscaping shall be distributed within the interior of the parking facility and the remaining 2/3 of the required landscaping shall be provided as peripheral planting on the exterior edges of the parking area. All landscape areas shall be well maintained in perpetuity.
2. A minimum of one 24-inch box tree shall be required for each four parking spaces, excluding parking areas adjacent to buildings, alternatively the Community Development Director may require the planting of trees at a different location on site. Said trees are intended to provide shade to parked vehicles and shall be of a type adapted for the climate of the Coachella Valley. Street side planters may contain palm trees at a rate of not more than 25%.
3. Parking lot trees may be coordinated with required street trees, but in no event shall the number of trees be less than one for every 20 lineal feet of street frontage.
The landscape plans shall comply with all applicable regulations as described in section 159.667 (Section 159.650 through 159.656 , Section 159.675 through 159.694, and Section 159.720 through 159.735).
Section 159.653 General Development Standards: 159.666 Regulations And Standards.
City of Indio Calculations:
1. A minimum of 15% of the total off-street open
parking area shall be landscaped with a mixture of
trees, shrubs, ground cover, other plant material and
hardscape material. A minimum of 1/3 of the required
landscaping shall be distributed within the interior
of the parking facility and the remaining 2/3 of the
required landscaping shall be provided as peripheral
planting on the exterior edges of the parking area. All landscape areas shall be well maintained in perpetuity.
See Table A below for calculations.
2. A minimum of one 24 inch box tree shall be required for each four parking spaces. Said trees are intended to provide shade to parked vehicles and shall be of a type adapted for the climate of the Coachella Valley. Street side planters may contain palm trees at a rate of not more than 25%.
See Table B below for calculations.
3. Parking lot trees may be coordinated with required street trees, but in no event shall the number of trees be less than one for every 20 lineal feet of street frontage.
All Parking Lot Trees facing street frontage are spaced at 18’-0” on-center.
A. Landscaping Distribution:
1. All parking lot landscaping shall be maintained in perpetuity, with all maintenance to include, but be limited to, irrigation corrections, fertilization, pruning and staking. All maintenance shall be performed with the overall goal of providing maximum plant health with minimum damage to hardscape, vehicles and persons. All significantly injured, decayed or dead trees and other plant material must be replaced within thirty days.
2. Landscape and automatic system plans, including the type and location of plant materials, shall be submitted to and approved by the design review process either as a part of a review process applicable to the subject property or prior to the issuance of building permits if no such review process is required.
3. Parking lot hardscape requirements. Parking lot dividers, islands, planters and planting areas shall be a minimum of four feet wide and four feet long. Trees area to be planted a minimum of five feet from walls, walks or buildings. To protect hardscape and encourage deep root development, root barriers shall be installed during planting operations.
B. Landscaping Installation:
1. Irrigation systems shall be installed within parking lot landscaping.
The irrigation system shall be an automatic system with an irrigation timer and two drip or bubbler heads per tree to provide adequate deep root irrigation.
* Parking lot landscape area (includes all planting and hardscape materials) shall be a minimum of 15% of the total off-street open parking area. * Interior parking lot landscape area (includes all planting and hardscape materials) shall be 1/3 of the parking lot landscape area
* Exterior parking lot landscape area (includes all planting and hardscape materials) shall be 2/3 of the parking lot landscape area.
* 1 tree per 4 parking stalls per City Standards
C. Landscaping Irrigation:
1. Know Boxes shall be provided at all gate locations and shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal.
D. Fire Department Notes:
City of Indio Notes
Building 1
Building 2
Clubhouse
to Remain
Cell Tower
Building 4
Building 3
Avenue 42
Jackson Street
Golf Course Parking Lot
Existing To Remain
Existing To Remain
N
0’ 20’ 40’ 80’
4. Irrigation systems shall be installed within parking lot landscaping.
The irrigation system shall be an automatic system with an irrigation timer and two drip or bubbler heads per tree to provide adequate deep root irrigation.
5. All parking lot landscaping shall be maintained in perpetuity, with all maintenance to include, but be limited to, irrigation corrections, fertilization, pruning and staking. All maintenance shall be performed with the overall goal of providing maximum plant health with minimum damage to hardscape, vehicles and persons. All significantly injured, decayed or dead trees and other plant material must be replaced within 30 days.
6. Landscape and automatic system plans, including the type and location of plant materials, shall be submitted to and approved by the design review process either as a part of a review process applicable to the subject property or prior to the issuance of building permits if no such review process is required.
7. Parking Lot Hardscape Requirements. Parking lot dividers, islands, planters and planting areas shall be a minimum of four feet wide and four feet long. Trees area to be planted a minimum of five feet from walls, walks or buildings. To protect hardscape and encourage deep root development, root barriers shall be installed during planting operations.
Indio Municipal Golf Course
THE GREENS INDIO | LANDSCAPE ENTITLEMENT DRAWINGS
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G
G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
EXCLUDED,
ALREADY
CONSTRUCTED
AREA: ±38,471
SF (±0.88 AC)
BLDG 3
FF=493.35
BLDG 2
FF=493.50
BLDG A
FF=492.46
BLDG 1
FF=495.10
0 20' 4
1" = 40' N
THE GREENS AT INDIO
NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42
Building 2 - Interior Patio Area
Key Map
Building 2 - Firepit Gathering Area Building 2 - Patio Entry 3 2 1
Scale: N.T.S.
Scale: N.T.S. Scale: N.T.S.
THE GREENS INDIO | Landscape Entitlement Drawings
Date: 09.07.2023 L0.02
Client:
Frontier Real Estate Investments
31791 Los Rios Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
92651-2453 United States
Landscape Architect:
Project Location: Avenue 42 and Jackson Street
Indio Municipal Golf Course
Avenue 42
Jackson Street
Existing to Remain
Existing to Remain
Building
2 Building 4
Building 3
Building 1
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES
1 2
3 All patio gates shall be installed in an accessible location with a compliant Knox Box at each entry per the requirements of the Indio Fire Department.
Note:
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G
G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
EXCLUDED,
ALREADY
CONSTRUCTED
AREA: ±38,471
SF (±0.88 AC)
BLDG 3
FF=493.35
BLDG 2
FF=493.50
BLDG A
FF=492.46
BLDG 1
FF=495.10
0 20' 4
1" = 40' N
THE GREENS AT INDIO
NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42
Typical Wall Elevation
Key Map
Section B - Avenue 42 Perimeter Berm + Wall Section A - Avenue 42 Primary Vehicular Entry Planted Berm 3 2 1
Primary Vehicular Entry
Planting Band
Concrete Sidewalk
Entry Tree
Accent Tree
6’-0” Compacted Earth Berm
Drive-Thru Aisle
1 1
2 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5 6
7 7
6 Drive-Thru Aisle
Property Line
Legend Legend
Legend
Planting Band
Off-Site Concrete Sidewalk
Off-Site Parkway Street Tree
Accent Tree
CMU Block Wall With Smooth
Stucco Finish and Rolled Stucco
Cap
Compacted Earth Berm
1 2
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
1 Scale: 3/16” = 1’-0”
Scale: 3/16” = 1’-0” Scale: 3/16” = 1’-0”
THE GREENS INDIO | Landscape Entitlement Drawings
Date: 09.07.2023 L0.03
Client:
Frontier Real Estate Investments
31791 Los Rios Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
92651-2453 United States
Landscape Architect:
Project Location: Avenue 42 and Jackson Street
C
ELEV
A
B
F
D
SECT
SECT
SECT
SECT
E
SECT
Avenue 42
Jackson Street
Existing to Remain
Existing to Remain
Building 2
Building 4
Building 3
Building 1
Planting Band
Accent Tree
Boulder
CMU Block Wall With
Smooth Stucco Finish
and Rolled Stucco Cap
1 2
3 4
Stucco Wall With Rolled Stucco Cap
Color: White
Finish: Smooth
Concept:
Provide a backdrop that accentuates
and highlights the sculptural and formal
character of the landscape plant palette
1 2
3 4
Indio Municipal Golf Course
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS
Section F - Jackson Street Secondary Vehicular Entry Wall Section E - Jackson Street Perimeter Planted Berm + Wall Elevation C - Primary Vehicular Entry From Avenue 42 Section D - Avenue 42 Perimeter Berm + Wall
4 3 1
2 Scale: 3/16” = 1’-0”
Scale: 3/16” = 1’-0” Scale: 3/16” = 1’-0”
Scale
Drive-Thru Aisle (Beyond)
Turn of Wall
Planting Band
Off-Site Concrete Sidewalk
Off-Site Parkway Street Tree
Project Concrete Sidewalk
Accent Tree
CMU Block Wall with Smooth
Stucco Finish and Rolled
Stucco Cap
6’-0” Compacted Earth Berm
Entry Tree
Cobble Accent Band
Compacted Earth Berm
Signage
1 1
2 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5 6
6 7
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
Drive-Thru Aisle
Property Line Planting Band
Off-Site Concrete Sidewalk
Off-Site Parkway Street Tree
CMU Block Wall With Smooth
Stucco Finish and Rolled
Stucco Cap
Compacted Earth Berm
1 2
2 2
3 4
4 3
5 5
6 6
1 Drive-Thru Aisle
Property Line
Planting Band
Off-Site Planting
Compacted Earth Berm
Off-Site Accent Tree
1 1
2 2 2
3 3
4 4
5 6
7 7
6 5 5
Drive-Thru Aisle
Planting Band
Accent Tree
Parkway Planting
Secondary Vehicular Entry
1 1
2 2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
CMU Block Signage Wall
Legend Legend
Legend Legend
CMU Block Wall with
Smooth Stucco Finish
and Rolled Stucco Cap
Off-site Concrete Sidewalk
THE GREENS INDIO | Landscape Entitlement Drawings
Date: 09.07.2023 L0.04
Client:
Frontier Real Estate Investments
31791 Los Rios Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
92651-2453 United States
Landscape Architect:
Project Location: Avenue 42 and Jackson Street
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS
Overstory Preliminary Plant Palette
Botanical Name Common Name Size Form Quantity WUCOLS Remarks/Comments Entry Trees
Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco 36” Box Min Multi-Trunk 12 Low Full, dense growth, premium select grade, specimen quality, symmetrical, well-rooted, as nursery tagged and field accepted by landscape architect.
Parkinsonia ‘Desert Museum’ Desert Museum Palo Verde 36” Box Min Multi-Trunk Low Prosopis glandulosa ‘Maverick’ Thornless Texas Honey Mesquite 36” Box Min Multi-Trunk Low Parking Lot Tree
Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco 24” Box Min Multi-Trunk 100 Low Full, dense growth, premium select grade, specimen quality, symmetrical, well-rooted, as nursery tagged and field accepted by landscape architect.
Dalbergia sissoo Indian Rosewood 24” Box Min Standard Low Prosopis glandulosa ‘Maverick’ Thornless Texas Honey Mesquite 24” Box Min Multi-Trunk Low Accent Trees
Acacia stenophylla Shoestring Acacia 24” Box Min Standard 68 Low Full, dense growth, premium select grade, specimen quality, symmetrical, well-rooted, as nursery tagged and field accepted by landscape architect.
Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco 24” Box Min Multi-Trunk Low Dalbergia sissoo Indian Rosewood 24” Box Min Standard Low Palm
Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm #5 Min Standard 13 Medium Full, dense growth, premium select grade, specimen quality, symmetrical, well-rooted, as nursery tagged and field accepted by landscape architect.
Brahea edulis Guadalupe Palm #5 Min Standard Medium
Chamaerops humilis ‘Compacta’ Dwarf Fan Palm #5 Min Multi-Trunk Medium Understory Preliminary Plant Palette
Botanical Name Common Name Size Form Spacing WUCOLS Remarks/Comments Groundcover & Shrub
Baccharis ssp. Desert Broom #1 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Low Full, dense growth, premium select grade, specimen quality, symmetrical, well-rooted, as nursery tagged
and field accepted by landscape architect.
Caesalpinia pulcherrima Peacock Flower #1 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Low Encelia farinosa Brittlebrush #1 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Very Low Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca #1 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Low Santolina ssp. Lavender Cotton #1 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Low Succulent and Cactus
Agave attenuata Fox Tail Agave #5 Min. Min. 2 stalks Per Plan Low Full, dense growth, premium select grade, specimen quality, symmetrical, well-rooted, as nursery tagged
and field accepted by landscape architect.
Agave ‘Blue Flame’ Blue Flame Agave #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Aloe ‘Blue Elf’ Blue Elf Aloe #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Agave ovatifolia Whale’s Tongue Agave #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Agave parryi Artichoke Agave #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Agave stricta Hedgehog Agave #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Agave victoriae-reginae Queen Victoria Agave #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Agave vilmoriniana Octopus Agave #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Dasylirion wheeleri Desert Spoon #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Echinocactus grusonii Golden Barrel Cactus #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Euphorbia ingens Candelabra Tree #5 Min. Min. 2 stalks Per Plan Low Euphorbia rigida Upright Myrtle Spurge #1 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo #5 Min. Min. 3 stalks Per Plan Very Low Nolina microcarpa Bear Grass #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Opuntia cacanapa ‘Ellisiana’ Spineless Prickly Pear Cactus #5 Min. Min. 3 paddles Per Plan Very Low Stenocereus thurberi Organ Pipe Cactus #5 Min. Min. 3 stalks Per Plan Very Low Pachycereus marginatus Mexican Fence Post Cactus #5 Min. Min. 3 stalks Per Plan Very Low Yucca rostrata Beaked Yucca #5 Min. Standard Per Plan Low Perimeter & Screening
Leucophyllum ssp. Texas Ranger #5 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Low Full, dense growth, premium select grade, specimen quality, symmetrical, well-rooted, as nursery tagged
and field accepted by landscape architect.
Olea europaea ‘Little Ollie’ Little Ollie Dwarf Olive #5 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Low Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Berry #5 Min. Standard 42” o.c. Low THE GREENS INDIO | Landscape Entitlement Drawings
Date: 09.07.2023 L0.05
Client:
Frontier Real Estate Investments
31791 Los Rios Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
92651-2453 United States
Landscape Architect:
Project Location: Avenue 42 and Jackson Street
Preliminary Plant Palette:
Preliminary Plant Palette Imagery:
Trees
Acacia willardiana
Palo Blanco
Acacia stenophylla
Shoestring Acacia
Prosopis glandulosa ‘Maverick’
Thornless Texas Honey Mesquite
Palms
Brahea edulis
Guadalupe Palm
Chamaerops humilis ‘Compacta’
Dwarf Fan Palm
Brahea armata
Mexican Blue Palm
Succulents & Cactus
Euphorbia rigida
Upright Myrtle Spurge
Euphorbia ingens
Candelabra Tree
Opuntia cacanapa ‘Ellisiana’
Spineless Prickley Pear Cactus
Stenocereus thurberi
Organ Pipe Cactus
Yucca rostrata
Beaked Yucca
Fouquieria splendens
Ocotillo
Agave attenuata
Fox Tail Agave
Agave ‘Blue Flame’
Blue Flame Agave
Agave stricta
Hedgehog Agave
Aloe ‘Blue Elf’
Blue Elf Aloe
Agave ovatifolia
Whale’s Tongue Agave
Dasylirion wheeleri
Desert Spoon
Agave victoriae-reginae
Queen Victoria Agave
Agave parryi
Artichoke Agave
Echinocactus grusonii
Golden Barrel Cactus
Agave vilmoriniana
Octopus Agave
Nolina microcarpa
Bear Grass
Pachycereus marginatus
Mexican Fence Post Cactus
Groundcover & Shrub Perimeter & Screening
Rhus integrifolia
Lemonade Berry
Santolina ssp.
Lavender Cotton
Baccharis ssp.
Desert Broom
Leucophyllum ssp.
Texas Ranger
Caesalpinia pulcherrima
Peacock Flower
Encelia farinosa
Brittlebrush
Olea europaea ‘Little Ollie’
Little Ollive Dwarf Olive
Hesperaloe parviflora
Red Yucca
Overstory Plant Palette Understory Plant Palette
PLANT PALETTE & IRRIGATION CONCEPT
Dalbergia sissoo
Indian Rosewood
Parkinsonia ‘Desert Museum’
Desert Museum Palo Verde
THE GREENS INDIO | Landscape Entitlement Drawings
Date: 09.07.2023 L0.06
Client:
Frontier Real Estate Investments
31791 Los Rios Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
92651-2453 United States
Landscape Architect:
Project Location: Avenue 42 and Jackson Street
LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION CONCEPT PLANS
Building 1
Building 2
Building 4
Building 3
Avenue 42
Jackson Street
Golf Course Parking Lot
Existing To Remain
Existing To Remain
N
0’ 20’ 40’ 80’
Indio Municipal Golf Course
Possible Irrigation
Controller Location
Clubhouse to Remain
1. The irrigation system will connect to the Indio Water Authority.
2. A separate water meter and backflow assembly shall be provided for the landscape irrigation. The landscape water shall be issued following the approval and signature of the landscape plans by the Indio Water Authority.
3. All new meter boxes shall be polymer with a 2” radio read port per Indio Water Authority standards.
4. A reduced pressure backflow prevention device shall be installed to protect all points of connection. The backflow prevention device shall meet all of the standards and requirements of the Indio Water Authority.
5. During the construction documentation phase of the project an irrigation design will be provided that will conform to the landscape design criteria outlined in Chapter 4 of the Landscape and Water Conservation of the Development Procedural Guidelines and Ordinance No. 1864 including the irrigation worksheets and calculations required by the Indio Water Authority.
6. A Smart Controller shall be used for the project and will be automatic, weather sensing, and water efficient. The controller will have a flow sensor capability to allow separate control valves to be automatically shut off when excess flow is detected.
7. Plantings will be arranged into similar hydrozones areas to help prevent wasting water.
1. A seperate water meter with a backflow assembly shall be provided for the landscape irrigation.
2. Meter boxes shall be polymer with a 2” radio read per Indio Water Authortiy standards.
3. Applicant shall complete the landscape documentation package in accordance with Ordinacne 1684: Water Efficient Landscapes and Irrigation systems.
4. Prior to the issuance of a landscape water meter, the applicant must have a complete set of landscape plans signed and approved by the Indio Water Authortiy.
The following is a summary of the proposed irrigation concept for the project landscape areas. A detail irrigation equipment list and irrigation design shall be provided during the construction documentation phase of the project. Please see the overview below of the conceptual irrigation design.
A. Irrigation Concept Introduction:
B. Irrigation Concept Overview:
C. Indio Water Authority Notes:
Irrigation Legend
Item Description
Drip Irrigation: Automatic, weather-sensing irrigation
system delivered by in-line sub-surface high efficiency system.
n/a Tree Bubbler: (2) per accent tree and (4) per heritage tree
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2036 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2037 of 3061
AWNING ABOVE SWITCHGEAR ALCOVE FIRE RISER
AWNING ABOVE INTERIORS BY TENANT NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 INDIO, CALIFORNIA BLDG 1 FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/8" = 1" September 20, 2022 P:\16\16430 - Indio, NEC Jackson & Ave 42\Design\Floor Plan\x16430 - Floor Plans - Bldg 1.dwg B I C K E L G R O U P A R C H I T E C T U R E BI C KE L G R O U P I NC O RPO RAT E D 3600 BIR C H S TRE E T, S U IT E 120 N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0 P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511 w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m NORTH
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2038 of 3061
PLASTER
.6069 T.O.PAPRAPET
221:0)! ¢
T.O. PARAPET
20:0)! ¢
T.O.ROOFDECK
141—77)¢
T.O.STOREFRONT/
B.O.CANOPY
9:4)! ¢
T.O.WAINSCOT¢ 3l—0H
FINISHFLOOR$_ 0l—077
T.O.PAPRAPE'
/ 22'—O"¢
T.O. PARAPE'
20'—O"i!
T.O.PAPRAPE'
/ I5'—O"i
710. ROOFDECK ¢ I4'—7"
T.O.STOREFRONT/
B.0. CANOPY
9:41’ ii
T.O.WAINSCOT¢ 3!—OD
FINISHFLOOR nun
0l—0l7$ II IIIIIIIITLII
OORONADO LEDOESTONE DARK BRONZE ANODIZED SOUTH ELEVATION DARK BRONZE ANODIZED CANOPY CORONADO LEDGESTONE EAST ELEVATION PRO-LEDGE ALUMINUM ALUMINUM SHERWIN WILLIAMS PRO—LEDGEBROOKSIDE FRENCH RCAST sw 5059 BROOKSIDE, TYP_ I
INWILLII MS I , a. 6364, T.O.PAPRAPE’
/ 22’—O"$
T.O.PARAPE'¢ 20'—O"
T.0. PAPRAPE"
/ I5'—0”$
710. ROOFDECK¢ I4'—7"
T.O.STOREFRONT/
B.O.CANOPY
g1—4H¢
T.O.WAINSCOT
3l—0l) ¢
FINISHFLOOR
()1—0HG
T.O.PAPRAPE'
22i—0N$
T.O.PARAPE'¢ 201:0"
T.O.ROOFDECK ¢ 14:71’
T.O.STOREFRONT/
B.0. CANOPY¢ 9:411
T.O.WAINSCOT
3l—ON$
FINISHFLOOR¢ 0:011
CORONADO LEDGESTONE NORTH ELEVATION CORONADO LEDGESTONE CANCPY WEST ELEVATION PRO—LEDG.E PRO—LEDGIE s|—IERv\/|N v\/||_|_|A|\/Is
BROOKSIDE, TYP_ BROOKSIDE, TYP_ FRENCH RCAST SW 5059
BLDG ‘I
i'R°cKHE.I;m:: TI—IE (3. R E E |\| S I|\| D IC) EI—SE6I\|:/ A1‘/_I:I=C3'I\IS BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120 September 7, 2023 P: 949_757_04-11 F: 949_757_O5-11 CA NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 P:\16\1643O — |ndIO, NEC Jackson &Ave 42\DeSIgn\E|evatIOnS\X16430 — www.biCke|grp.Com EIOVOIIOOS-OIWQ Thepians,Ideas,arrangements anddesigns Indicatedorrepresentedbythisdrawingareownedby, andarethepropertyofBICKELGROUP,andwerecreatedand ’ developedsolelyforuseon,andinconnectionwiththisspecific ‘ ct,andshallnotbe used,inwhoieorinpart,foranypurposeforwhichtheywerenotoriginaliy intendedwithoutwrittenpermissionfromBICKELGROUP© 201 .
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2039 of 3061
FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION
CANOPY CANOPY
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS
FRENCH ROAST FRENCH ROAST
T.O.CANOPY T.O.CANOPY
SW 6069 SW 6069
B.O.CANOPYé B.O.CANOPY 8:0” 87:0” $
\ T.O.WALL¢ \ -I.O.WALL¢ BFTOW 67:0"
FINISHFLOOR$ FINISHFLOOR 07:0" 0:0’? $
CMU BLOCK, DOOR SI—IERWINWILLIAMS CMU BLOCK,
ANGELUS BLOCK, SI—IERWINWILLIAMS FRENCH ROAST ANGELUS BLOCK, PRECISION, FRENCH ROAST SW 6069 PRECISION,SPICE SW 6069 SPICE
FLOOR PLAN
REAR ELEVATION
CANOPY ‘kSI—IERWINWILLIAMS A/IEFRENCH ROASTSW 6069
B.O.CANOPY
8’—o”OP
T.O.WALL
6’—o”RP
FINISHFLOOR
0 :0 a X A A V V A
ITRASHBIN I
_I |_____J
CMU BLOCK,ANCELUS BLOCK, 7, , PRECISION, I5SPICE
TRASH ENCLOSURE
iLi"oK.f.#EGJiB‘éE TI—IE (3. R E E |\| S I|\| D IC) DEI§lF§I?IrYP'BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120 September 20, 2022
P: 949_757_04-I-I F: 949_757_05-I-I
9 NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 P:\16\1643O — lndio, NEC Jackson &Ave 42\DeSIgn\E|evatIOns\x16430 — www.biCke|grp.Com EIeVatI0i7S-OIWQ Thepiahs,ideas, arrangements anddesigns indicatedorrepresentedbythisdrawingareownedby, andarethe propertyofBICKELGROUP,andwerecreatedand ’ deveiopedsoieiyforuseon, and in connectionwiththisspecific ect, and shaiinotbe used, in whcieorin part,forany purposeforwhichtheywerenotoriginaliy intendedwithoutwrittenpermission fromBICKELGROUP© 20
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2040 of 3061
SHERWI R
WHITE
I I ‘ I {5
T.0. PARAPEI916-8"T.0. ROOFDEC . _ j , f 4 I I = . . ' - ‘_ , “> 15.3” .4 ‘A ' I , 1 ,, .I 4; -._., - ' y - I“ ATIOCOVER‘ ‘no.2 7 " 15'-3" we Ls?I*ILI§i»§III\*:IE _, It
STONE VENEER DARK BRONZE STONE VENEER
OORONADO — LEDGESTONE ANODIZED ALUMINUM OORONADO — LEDGESTONEPRO—LEDGIE — BROOKSIDE PRO—LEDGIE — BROOKSIDE V
ONADO _ :1
I, ‘ ~ .?._.LEDGE — can-=. .. WINGWALL - / 16’-8”¢
T.0. ROOFDECK
7 WINWILLIAMS €54» ‘ ’_T’*“_, IERYSW 6358 T.0. PAll0COVER ' 10’-8"65 \T.o.STOREFRONT¢ 15’-8"
FINISHFLOOR
o’—o"¢
SHERWIN WILLIAMS DARK BRONZE ANODIZEDFRENCH ROAST SW 6069 ALUMINUM, TYP. I . ,_» ’""ASTER
I SHERWIN WINGWALL
N
CREAMERYS - ~ ,8,_,,. , E. . “ T.0.PARAPEl$
T; A . ,_ , . r I . , \T.0. ROOFDECK¢ MIii’-' 15'—8" T.O.PARAPEI 10'—8"$
T.0. GATE
4'-o" ¢
FINISHFLOOR
o’—o'¢
SHERWIN WILLIAMS RLASTER NORTH ELEVATIONCREAIVIERY sw 5358 SHERWIN WILLIAMSTYP. CREAMERY SW 6358 1 PLASTER VENEER
SAHTERWI WILLIAMS I’ — LEDGESTONECI
A
T358 , —*BROOKSIDE wmgWALL ‘ ‘ " ‘Jr’ 181-0!
I CAN§§&(YQ.3T.0. PARAPEIQ! SHE WIN WILLIAMS 15'-3'
E
I=RENCH ROAST ' I '.""“"5059 T.0. CANOPY¢ . :is‘? ?g! “ 10'-8' ‘I 2' \T.o.STOREFRONT¢ 15’—8" ‘ I DARK BRONZE
ANODIZED ALUMINUM
T it In 2‘ I. 5 W I
I >7 _ , J
t A ,, 4* :1 Ta E _ PLASTER STONE VENEER
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CORONADO - LEDGESTONE
CREAIVIERY SW 5358 PRO—LEDGIE — BROOKSIDE BL 2
i'R°oKHE.::JI3II: TI—IE (3. R E E |\| S I|\| D I© ELsE
\.fE'S3rNS
BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120 December 13, 2022P: 949_757_04-1 1 F: 949_757_05-1 CA
1 NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 P:\16\1643O — |ndIO, NEC Jackson & Ave 42\DeSIgn\E|evatIOnS\X16430 — www.biCke|grp.COm EIeVatI0nS-OIWQ Theplans,ideas,arrangements anddesigns indicatedorrepresentedbythisdrawingareownedby, andarethepropertyofBICKELGROUP,andwerecreatedand ’ developedsolelyforuseon,and inconnectionwiththisspecificproject,and shallnotbe used, inwholeorinpart,foranypurposeforwhichtheywerenotoriginally intendedwithoutwrittenpermissionfromBICKELGROUP© 2017.
FINISHFLOOR
o’-0' ¢
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2041 of 3061
FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION
CANOPY CANOPY
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS
FRENCH ROAST FRENCH ROAST
T.O.CANOPY T.O.CANOPY
SW 6069 SW 6069
B.O.CANOPYé B.O.CANOPY 8:0” 87:0” $
\ T.O.WALL¢ \ -I.O.WALL¢ BFTOW 67:0"
FINISHFLOOR$ FINISHFLOOR 07:0" 0:0’? $
CMU BLOCK, DOOR SI—IERWINWILLIAMS CMU BLOCK,
ANGELUS BLOCK, SI—IERWINWILLIAMS FRENCH ROAST ANGELUS BLOCK, PRECISION, FRENCH ROAST SW 6069 PRECISION,SPICE SW 6069 SPICE
FLOOR PLAN
REAR ELEVATION
CANOPY ‘kSI—IERWINWILLIAMS A/IEFRENCH ROASTSW 6069
B.O.CANOPY
8’—o”OP
T.O.WALL
6’—o”RP
FINISHFLOOR
0 :0 a X A A V V A
ITRASHBIN I
_I |_____J
CMU BLOCK,ANCELUS BLOCK, 7, , PRECISION, I5SPICE
TRASH ENCLOSURE
iLi"oK.f.#EGJiB‘éE TI—IE (3. R E E |\| S I|\| D IC) DEI§lF§I?IrYP'BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED 3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120 September 20, 2022
P: 949_757_04-I-I F: 949_757_05-I-I
9 NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 P:\16\1643O — lndio, NEC Jackson &Ave 42\DeSIgn\E|evatIOns\x16430 — www.biCke|grp.Com EIeVatI0i7S-OIWQ Thepiahs,ideas, arrangements anddesigns indicatedorrepresentedbythisdrawingareownedby, andarethe propertyofBICKELGROUP,andwerecreatedand ’ deveiopedsoieiyforuseon, and in connectionwiththisspecific ect, and shaiinotbe used, in whcieorin part,forany purposeforwhichtheywerenotoriginaliy intendedwithoutwrittenpermission fromBICKELGROUP© 20
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2042 of 3061 KITCHEN BAR G G WALK-IN COOLER FREEZER PATIO SEE LANDSCAPE CANOPY ABOVE SWITCHGEARFIRE RISER HVAC YARD MEN'S WOMEN'S FENCE NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 INDIO, CALIFORNIA BLDG 2 FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/8" = 1" December 13, 2022 P:\16\16430 - Indio, NEC Jackson & Ave 42\Design\Floor Plan\x16430 - Floor Plans - Restaurant.dwg B I C K E L G R O U P A R C H I T E C T U R E BI C KE L G R O U P I NC O RPO RAT E D 3600 BIR C H S TRE E T, S U IT E 120 N E W P O R T B E A C H , C A 9 2 6 6 0 P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511 w w w . b i c k e l g r p . c o m NORTH
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2043 of 3061
BICKEL GROUP
ARCHITECTUREBICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED3600 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 120NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511 www.bicke|grp.com
THE GREENS INDIO
NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42
INDKLCAUFCRNM
RENDER 1
December 6, 2022
P:\16\16430 — Indio, NEC Jackson & Ave 42\Design\F|oor
P|an\x16430 — Floor Plans — Restaurantdwg
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2044 of 3061 BLIDEP
B I C
K
E
L
G
R
O
U
P
I HE GREENS INDIO RENDER2
BICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED
Decernbera 2022 PBORRCTH
& P:\16\16430-
Indio,NECJackson<‘;«Ave42\Design\F|oor
P; 949_757_0411 F; 949_757_0511 P|em\x16430-F|oorF'|ans—Restaurantdwg www.bicke|grp.com
’ me marsmessarvengememsam deswgnsHdmaled or reprssenlm mms drawmg ave mm mand ave mzam 2 rnr awe B?nu?amvyzrecreate?andd uausmemmsean,anunmnnacnr W'm5specmcpvo;e dsha n he mwrv rmpamranyamusewwmcnureywevznmcngmaumeraaawmnum-. uerr1ssoMro'ni\CKELGR()U “ ma
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2045 of 3061
PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS
Jackson St. & Ave. 42, Indio, CA
09-15-22 09-18-23
File Name: 22-136 Color Elevations 08-16-23
STC-1
STC-2
A-1
Stucco - Painted, Color: Dunn Edwards #DEW380 "Warm White" Stucco - Painted, Color: Dunn Edwards #DE6230 "Center Ridge" Aluminum Awning - Color: "Dark Bronze"
ST-1 YKK Storefront System - Color: "Dark Bronze"
STC-3 Stucco - Painted, Color: Sherwin Williams CFA Custom "Urban Night" EC-1 Parapet Wall Coping - Durolast/Exceptional Metals - Color: To Match Adjacent Painted Stucco Finish
COLOR AND MATERIAL LEGEND
Note:
All roof top mechanical equipment shall be located in
equipment well and screened from view by parapet walls. 0 10 20 30
STN-1 Coronado Ledgestone - Pro-Ledge - Brookside
NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION
Aluminum Awning A-1
Stucco STC-2
Stucco STC-1
Stucco STC-3
Aluminum Awning - A-1
Stucco STC-2
Stucco STC-1
Parapet Wall Coping EC-1
Storefront ST-1
Ledgestone STN-1
WOMEN MEN TEAM MEMBER EMPLOYEE RESTROOM OFFICE PLAYGROUND TECH CLOSET 2 Tier 3036 1836 2 Tier 2154 1854 ORDER SERVING MEAL FULFILLMENT AREA KITCHEN DINING QUEUE (32 Tables, 86 Seats) ENTRY ENTRY 20'-9 1/2" 62'-2 1/2" 83'-0" 30'-10" 30'-0"
60'-10" 7'-6" 6'-4" 47'-7" 22'-7" 84'-0"
7'-4" 45'-10" 10'-0"
63'-2" 09-16-22 Information contained on this drawing and in all digital files produced for above named project
may not be reproduced in any manner without
express written or verbal consent fromauthorized project representatives. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT # PRINTED FOR DATE SHEET SHEET NUMBER AA DRAWN BYChick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION JACKSON & AVE 42 REVISION SCHEDULE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL
NEC OF JACKSON AND AVE 42
INDIO, CA A FSR# 05307
CHICK-FIL-A 22-136 1 BCDE ABCDE 4 3 2 4 3 2 1 Pre-App Submittal 09-16-22 Pre-App Submittal PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN 1/4"= 1'-0" 1 A-110 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN NORTH
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2047 of 3061 Chick-Fil-A - Outdoor Meal Delivery (OMD) Canopy
Chick-Fil-A - Outdoor Meal Delivery (OMD) Canopy
Chick-Fil-A - Order Point canopy
Chick-Fil-A - Order Point canopy
3'-8 1/2" 1 3/4" 1 3/4"
4'-0" 4'-0" ROUGH OPENING: 48-3/8"(W) x 48-3/8"(H)
2 1/2" 3'-5"
4'-0" 4 1/2" 4'-0" 1 3/4" 3'-8 1/2" 1 3/4"
4 1/2" WINDOW TYPE SCHEDULE
A
6'-0"
8'-10" 4'-0"
4'-0" 1'-8"
5'-8"
8'-10" 2'-9" 2'-9" 8'-11"
B 2'-9"
3'-2"
C
2'-10"
1'-6"
8'-10" 2'-8 5/8" 2'-8 5/8" 2'-8 5/8"
3'-8" 1'-6" 12'-0"
7'-0"
3'-2" 3'-0"
4 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" FIXED U-FACTOR = U-0.38 OPERABLE U-FACTOR = U-0.48 DOOR FRAME TYPE SCHEDULE NOTES:
2 DOOR TYPE SCHEDULE NOTES:
1 12 REFERENCE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR SIZES AND MATERIALS (TYP.) DOOR HARDWARE, CLOSERS, KICKPLATES, PANIC HARDWARE AND THRESHOLDS SHALL BE LOCATED AND INSTALLED PER ADA AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.1 REFERENCE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR SIZES AND MATERIALS (TYP.) NEW FULL HEIGHT INTERIOR PARTITION NEW EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION NEW PRE-FAB WALK-IN COOLER SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. G.C. TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL INTERIOR FINISHES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 803. INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALL AND CEILINGS SHALL BE TESTED AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 803. FLAME SPREAD RATINGS: WALL TILE - CLASS A - <25 WALL PAINT - CLASS A - <5 PLASTIC LAMINATE - CLASS A - <25 FRP PANELS - CLASS A - <25 STAINLESS STEEL CORNER GUARDS - CLASS A - <25 CEILING TILE - CLASS A - <25 4. FIRE BLOCKING MUST BE PROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 718.2 AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: a. IN CONCEALED SPACES OF STUD WALLS AND PARTITIONS, INCLUDING FURRED SPACES, AT THE CEILING AND FLOOR LEVELS. b. IN CONCEALED SPACES OF STUD WALLS AND PARTITIONS, INCLUDING FURRED SPACES, AT 10-FOOR INTERVALS ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE WALL. c. AT THE INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES SUCH AS OCCUR AT SOFFITS, DROP CEILINGS AND COVE CEILINGS. d. IN CONCEALED SPACES BETWEEN STAIR STRINGERS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE RUN AND BETWEEN STUDS ALONG AND IN LINE WITH THE RUN OF STAIRS IF THE WALL UNDER STAIRS IS UNFINISHED. e. IN OPENINGS AROUND VENTS, PIPES, DUCTS, CHIMNEYS, FIREPLACES AND SIMILAR OPENINGS WHICH AFFORD A PASSAGE FOR FIRE AT CEILINGS AND FLOOR LEVELS, WITH NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. PARTITION KEY NOTE: HAND-ACTIVATED DOOR-OPENING HARDWARE SHALL BE LOCATED 30 MIN. AND 44 MAX. INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR. LATCHING AND LOCKING DOORS THAT ARE HAND-ACTIVATED AND WHICH ARE IN A PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH A SINGLE EFFORT BY LEVER-TYPE HARDWARE, PANIC BARS, PUSH-PULL ACTIVATING BARS, OR OTHER HARDWARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PASSAGE WITHOUT REQUIRING THE ABILITY TO GRASP THE OPENING HARDWARE. 0' 2' 4' DOOR NOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS ISSUED SO THAT THE CONTRACTOR CAN MAINTAIN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE FOR WHEELCHAIR MANEUVERABILITY AT DOORS. THIS DETAIL INDICATES PARTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE. IT IS ADVISED THAT THE CONTRACTOR OBTAIN A COMPLETE COPY OF THESE CODES FOR REFERENCE. 2. THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE CRITICAL FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODES. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE PROPER CLEARANCES FOR WHEELCHAIR MANEUVERABILITY. IF CONFLICTS OCCUR, BRING TO DESIGNERS ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY. 3. FOR FULL SWING DOORS A MINIMUM 2'-10" WIDE DOOR IS REQUIRED FOR CLEARANCE. FOR 90° SWING DOORS A MINIMUM 3'-0" WIDE DOOR IS REQUIRED FOR CLEARANCE. 4. IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED 12" OR 18" MINIMUM CLEARANCES AT DOOR AND A MINIMUM PASSAGE WIDTH, THE DOOR FRAME AT HINGE SIDE MAY HAVE TO BE AGAINST THE ADJACENT WALL. 5. THE MAXIMUM EFFORT FOR BOTH INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR DOORS IS 5 LBS. CLOSING SPEED IS 5 SEC MIN. FROM 90° TO 12°. 6. 1/2" MAXIMUM HIGH THRESHOLD (ABOVE FLOOR AND LANDING ON BOTH SIDES) AT BUILDING ENTRANCES AND ALL DOORS. 7. DOOR HARDWARE AT ALL EXIT DOORS TO ALLOW DOORS TO BE OPENED FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT KEY, SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT PER APPROPRIATE CODE. 8. SIGNAGE FOR ONLY MAIN ENTRY DOORS ALLOWED TO HAVE KEY LOCKING DEVICES TO STATE, "THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED" 9. 10" HIGH KICK PLATE AT BOTTOM OF GLAZED AND STOREFRONT DOORS. 10. ALL DOORS EQUIPPED WITH SINGLE-EFFORT, NON-GRASPING TYPE HARDWARE BETWEEN 34" MIN. AND 44" MAX. ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR. 11. WIDTH OF DOORS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 36" TO PROVIDE REQUIRED 32" NET CLEARANCE WIDTH BETWEEN THE FACE OF THE DOOR AND THE JAMB. 12. ALL DOORS TO BE KEYED ALIKE; GC TO PROVIDE A TOTAL OF 4 KEYS. 3 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" TYPICAL DOOR PLAN FOR WHEELCHAIR ACCESS HARDWARE GROUPS: GROUP 1: 1 EA. HINGES PIANO HINGES - CONTINUOUS 1 EA. TRILOGY T2 SERIES EXIT TRIM ETDL27 ALARM LOCK ALL METAL 12 BUTTON KEYPAD, WATERPROOF VERSION WITH US26D FINISH 1 EA. THRESHOLD PEMKO 2716A 1 EA. DOOR SHOE PEMKO 211APK 1 EA. DOOR SEAL PS074, BLACK 1 EA. FLOOR STOP 1 EA. DOOR CLOSER SARGENT 1431 RUO EN 1 EA. PANIC PUSH HARDWARE 1 EA. 40"x30" KICK PLATE, INTERIOR, HAGER 190S FINISH: US32D GROUP 2: 1 EA. HINGES PIANO HINGES - CONTINUOUS 1 EA. TRILOGY T2 SERIES EXIT TRIM ETDL27 ALARM LOCK ALL METAL 12 BUTTON KEYPAD, WATERPROOF VERSION WITH US26D FINISH 1 EA. THRESHOLD PEMKO 2716A 1 EA. DOOR SHOE PEMKO 211APK 1 EA. DOOR SEAL PS074, BLACK 1 EA. FLOOR STOP 1 EA. DOOR CLOSER SARGENT 1431 RUO EN 1 EA. PANIC PUSH HARDWARE 1 EA. 34"x30" KICK PLATE, INTERIOR, HAGER 190S FINISH: US32D GROUP 3: 3 EA. HINGES MCKINNEY T2714 4.5X4.5 NRP, FINISH 652 1 EA. DEADBOLT SCHLAGE B571 INDICATOR, 626 SATIN FINISH 1 EA. PUSH PLATE, 626 SATIN FINISH 1 EA. HANDLE PULL, 626 SATIN FINISH 1 EA. DOOR CLOSER SARGENT 1431 RUO EN 1 EA. 34"X12" KICK PLATE, HAGER 190S FINISH: US32D GROUP 4: 3 EA. HINGES MCKINNEY T2714 4.5X4.5 NRP, FINISH 652 1 EA. LOCKSET SCHLAGE L9453 ENTRANCE LOCK SCHLAGE 06 STANDARD HANDLE SATIN FINISH FULL FACE, ESCUTCHLE0N L583-363 EZ TURN 1 EA. FLUSH BOLT IVES FB31P 1 EA. LATCH GUARD, STAINLESS STEEL, 7" 1 EA. THRESHOLD PEMKO 175A-72 1 EA. DOOR SHOE PEMKO 211APK 1 EA. DOOR SEAL PS074, BLACK 1 EA. KICK DOWN IVES FS555 5" BLACK PAINTED GROUP 5: 3 EA. HINGES MCKINNEY T2714 4.5 X 4.5 NRP, US26D FINISH 1 EA. LOCKSET SCHLAGE L9453 ENTRANCE LOCK SCHLAGE 06 STANDARD HANDLE SATIN FINISH FULL FACE, ESCUTCHLE0N L583-363 EZ TURN 1 EA. THRESHOLD PEMKO 175A-72 1 EA. DOOR SHOE PEMKO 211APK 1 EA. DOOR VENT 24"x12" MIN. 1 EA. KICK DOWN IVES FS555 5" BLK FINISH GROUP 6: 2 EA. HINGES MCKINNEY T2714 4.5 X 4.5 NRP, US26D FINISH 1 EA. SCHLAGE JD60630 SINGLE CYLINDER DEAD BOLT 1 EA. DOOR SEAL PS074, BLACK 2 NO T TO SCALE WALL ASSEMBLY TYPES
C
D 2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 1/2" PLYWOOD, BOTH SIDES SMOOTH FRP PANEL, BOTH SIDES 2X4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 1/2" PLYWOOD, ONE SIDE SMOOTH FRP PANEL, ONE SIDE A 2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 1/2" PLYWOOD, COORDINATE W/ STRUCTURAL, BOTH SIDES SMOOTH FRP PANEL, INTERIOR WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER (TYVEK OR SIM.) EXTERIOR SIDING, SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS B 2X4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 1/2" PLYWOOD, COORDINATE W/ STRUCTURAL, BOTH SIDES WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER (TYVEK OR SIM.) EXTERIOR SIDING, SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS E BATT INSULATION BATT INSULATION 2X4 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 1/2" PLYWOOD, COORDINATE W/ STRUCTURAL WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER (TYVEK OR SIM.) EXTERIOR SIDING, SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS R-13 SOUND BATT INSULATION @ RR A1 2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 1/2" PLYWOOD, COORDINATE W/ STRUCTURAL, BOTH SIDES SMOOTH FRP PANEL, OVER 5/8" TYP 'X' GYP. BD. TO DECK AT INTERIOR 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP. BD. TO CEILING AT ELEC. ROOM BATT INSULATION 1 HR RATED WALL. SEE WALL SECTION 2/A7.1 FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. UL DESIGN U305 F 1/2" PLYWOOD, BOTH SIDES 2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. 2X4 STUDS @ 24" O.C. WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER (TYVEK OR SIM.) EXTERIOR SIDING, SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SMOOTH FRP PANEL, ONE SIDE 2'-8" MIN. CLEAR FOR 90° SWING DOOR MIN. 3'-0" DOOR FOR 90° SWING DOOR 24" MIN. CLR. PULL SIDE 12" MIN CLR. PUSH SIDE 4'-8" MIN CLR. FOR DOOR ON PULL SIDE 4'-2" MIN CLR. FOR DOOR ON PUSH SIDE 2'-10" MIN. DOOR FOR FULL SWING DOOR FOR WALL LOCATION SEE PLAN PLAN NOTES 1. 36" Ø FOUNDATION SONO TUBE (OR SIM.) BLOCK OUT, TYP. 2. PROVIDE PLYWOOD SHEATHING ABOVE COOLER 3. PAINT DOOR AND FRAME PT-2, BOTH SIDES 4. LINE OF AWNING ABOVE 5. LINE OF FRAMED CANOPY ABOVE 6. G.C. TO INSTALL FF-2 UNDER ALL EQUIPMENT FOR EASY CLEANING, HATCHED AREAS TO RECEIVE SMOOTH TILE 7. PROVIDE 2X BLOCKING AT HAND SINK 2" 2" 2" 2" 2"
2" 2"
2" 2" 2"
2" 2"
3 4 FINISH SCHEDULE ID TAG FINISH DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL REMARKS FLOOR FF-1 FLOOR TILE -TEXTURED BEDROSIANS 6"x 6" DOTTI ANTHRACITE R12 - DIAMOND TEXTURED PRODUCTION AREA FIELD TILE FF-2 FLOOR TILE - SMOOTH BEDROSIANS 6"x 6" DOTTI ANTHRACITE MATT R9 - SMOOTH INSTALLED UNDER COUNTERTOPS & EQUIPMENT; REFER TO NOTE PLAN NOTE 6 EPOXY GROUT LATICRETE IG 2000 IND. EPOXY GROUT #2 KIT BLACK JOB PACK STRECTRALOCK IG 2000 PART A/B EPOXY GROUT STECTRALOCK PART C COLOR PACKET PERMACOLOR GROUT BOND COAT LATICRETE 4-XLT GRAY CAULKING LATICRETE LATASIL CAULKING WATERPROOFING LATICRETE HYDRO BAN WATERPROOF/ANTIFRACTURE WALL WF-1 (FRP) FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANEL MARLITE S 100G - 4'x 10' PANELS COLOR: WHITE; PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY TRIM PIECES WF-2 CDX 1/2" COLOR: OUTDOOR LATEX WHITE PAINT BASEBF-1 WALL BASE - COVE BEDROSIANS 4" x 8" SMOOTH COVE - ANTHRACITE SANITARY COVE CEILING CLG-1 VINYL FACED ACT USG SHEETROCK BRAND LAY-IN CEILING PANEL - 3260 FLAT WHITE; SMOOTH CLG-2 FRP OVER 1/2" CDX MARLITE S 100G - 4'x 10' PANELS COLOR: WHITE; PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY TRIM PIECES; PROVIDE ADHESIVE & PAN HEAD SCREWS AT 24" O.C., E.W. PAINT PT-1 DB LIGHT GRAY SHERWIN WILLIAMS 8656-12046 - BLDG DB LIGHT GRAY REFER TO S.W. PAINT SPECS PT-2 DB DARK GRAY SHERWIN WILLIAMS 8656-11295 - BLDG DB DARK GRAY REFER TO S.W. PAINT SPECS PT-3 DB BLUE SHERWIN WILLIAMS 8656-12045 - BLDG DB BLUE REFER TO S.W. PAINT SPECS PT-4 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW-7006 - EXTRA WHIE SEMI GLOSS GUARDS CG CORNER GUARD AIS INDUSTRIES CUSTOM 120" LONG W/ 2" WINGS, DRILLED, 90° SHARP CORNER, BRUSHED FINISH WG WALL GUARD AIS INDUSTRIES CUSTOM 48" WIDE, WRAP FROM SERVICE WINDOW SILL TO TOP OF COVE BASE, BRUSHED FINSIH 2'-10" 3'-7" MAX. A.F.F. 3'-6" 6" 3'-0"
7'-0"
7'-0" 3'-0"
7'-0"
10" 2'-4" 4" 4" PUSH BAR @ INTERIOR
34"-48"
PER ADA 6" 2'-6" 7'-0"
7'-0"
4" 3'-0"
7'-0" 3'-0"
3'-0" 2'-0" A.F.F. DOOR SCHEDULE
# SIZE TYPE GLASS MATERIAL HARDWARE NOTES: WIDTH HEIGHT DR. FR. DR. FR. 01 3'-6" 7'-0" A 1 TEMP. HM HMD GROUP 1 A,B,C,D,E,F 02 3'-0" 7'-0" B 2 TEMP. STOREFRONT GROUP 2 A,B,C,D,E,F 03 3'-0" 7'-0" C 2 - HM HMD GROUP 3 B,D,F 04 7'-0" 7'-0" D 4 - HM HMD GROUP 4 B 05 3'-0" 7'-0" E 2 - HM HMD GROUP 5 B 06 3'-0" 3'-0" F 3 - HM HMD GROUP 6 B NOTES: HM: HOLLOW METAL, 16 GA. HMD: HOLLOW METAL WELDED & DIMPLED A ENSURE EMERGENCY HARDWARE IS IN WORKING CONDITION. B DOOR & FRAME SHALL BE PAINT GRADE & PAINTED DUTCH BROS DARK GRAY.
C DOOR TO HAVE SIGN POSTED ABOVE THAT STATES: "THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHILE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED." D CLOSER SHALL BE BOLTED THROUGH DOOR LEAF & ARM MOUNTED USING HEAD-JAMB MOUNT. E PROVIDE ADA COMPLIANT THRESHOLD SET IN SILICONE SEALANT.
F THE FORCE FOR PUSHING OR PULLING OPEN INTERIOR SWINGING EGRESS DOORS, OTHER THAN FIRE DOORS, SJHALL NOT EXCEED 5 LBS. THESE FORCES DO NOT APPLY TO THE FORCE REQUIRED TO RETRACT LATCH BOLTS OR DISENGAGE OTHER DEVICES THAT HOLD THE DOOR IN A CLOSED POSITION. FOR OTHER SWINGING DOORS, THE DOOR LATCH SHALL RELEASE WHEN SUBJECTED TO A 15 LB FORCE. THE DOOR SHALL BE SET IN MOTION WHEN SUBJECTED TO A 30 LB FORCE. THE DOOR SHALL SWING TO A FULL-OPEN POSITION WHEN SUJECTO TO A 15 LB FORCE PER IBC 1010.1.3 NOTES: - STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEMS SHALL HAVE A CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM FACTORY FINISH - ALL GLAZING SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS PER SPECS ON SHEET G2.3 A
B
C
D
E
F REFER TO FLOOR PLAN FOR SLIDE DIRECTION
FLOOR SINK
3COMP. SINK
HAND SINK
CL CL CL CL
LC
CL CL
CL CL
CL
CL
LC
F B A1
E
A
A
D
D
CL
4 6 WG BF-1 FF-1
7 BF-1 FF-1 WF-1 BF-1 WF-2 CG
2 CG BF-1 FF-1 WF-1
3 BF-1 FF-1 WF-1 TYP. CGWG
3 3
4 CG 03 01 04 05 CG 02 1TYP.
C
AA
B
E
A C
B
F
4 4
5 3
2 7
CL
CL
CL
CL A2.0 FLOOR PLAN/ DETAILS/ SCHEDULES SHEET NAME: SHEET NUMBER: REV: DATE: DESCRIPTION:
cARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE & ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404 PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 Project No: CA3704
Dutch Bros Coffee - New Freestanding Store
DB2550-A2
JACKSON ST & AVE. 42
INDIO, CA 92203
APN: 692-670-009
ISSUED DATE: 12/06/2021
N
Y:\Active Projects\Dutch Bros\21 - CA3704 NEC Jackson & Ave. 42, Indio, CA\Drawings\CA3704 - A2.0 - FLOOR PLAN - A2.dwg, 12/20/2021 2:47:11 PM, hassna
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2052 of 3061 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 3 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 4 TRASH ENCLOSURE GENERAL NOTES: 1. REFER TO STRUCTURAL FOR MASONRY, CONCRETE, STRUCTURAL STEEL AND REINFORCING STEEL FOR SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PROVIDE LOCKING MECHANISM ON MAIN DOORS AND PEDESTRIAN DOOR 3. PROVIDE SITE LIGHTING AT TRASH ENCLOSURE. MIN. 5 FOOT CANDLE. 4. GATE TO BE BUILT WITH 1-1/2" SQUARE STEEL TUBING WITH ALL JOINTS FULLY WELDED TOGETHER AND 1 CROSS MEMBER PER GATE. FRAME TO BE PRIMED AND PAINTED BLACK IN COLOR. 5. ALL CONCRETE TO BE MIN. 3000 PSI IN 28 DAYS. 6. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFICATIONS (GENERAL NOTES) AND TYPICAL DETAILS FOR MASONRY, CONCRETE, STRUCTURAL STEEL AND REINFORCING STEEL. 3" x 2" x 1/4" STD. STEEL ANGLE WELD ALL JOINTS & GRIND SMOOTH 18 GA METAL DECK; PER PLAN TS 3" x 2" x 1/4" STD STEEL, WELD ALL JOINTS & GRIND SMOOTH ROUND CONCRETE TOP, PAINT PER PLAN 6" DIA GALVANIZED PIPE GATE POST, FILL SOLID WITH CONCRETE, PAINT PER PLAN (3) GALVANIZED STEEL HINGE COLLARS W/ GREASE FITTINGS WELD TO GATE ANGLE FRAMING PAINT PER PLAN 3" X 1/4" STEEL PLATE WELDED TO METAL DECK (3) STEEL HINGE COLLARS W/ GREASE FITTING; WELD TO GATE ANGLE FRAMING; PAINT PER PLAN TS INTERMEDIATE 3" x 2" x 1/4" STD. STEEL FRAME; WELD ALL JOINTS GRIND SMOOTH (3) STEEL HINGE RETAIN SLEEVE WELDED TO STEEL GATE POST 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE DUMPSTER PAD OVER GAVEL SLOPE TO DRAIN; REFER TO STRUCTURAL SHEETS (2) 6" DIA GALVANIZED PIPE GATE POST FILL SOLID W/ CONCRETE PAINT PT-1; EMBED 3'-0" INTO CONC. FTG. W/ 5/8" DIA. X 6" ANCHOR 3" x 2" x 1/4" STD. STEEL ANGLE, WELD ALL JOINTS & GRIND SMOOTH AEP SPAN METAL SIDING, TO MATCH BUILDING TS 3" x 2" x 1/4" STD STEEL, WELD ALL JOINTS & GRIND SMOOTH (3) GALVANIZED STEEL HINGE COLLARS W/ GREASE FITTINGS, WELD TO GATE ANGLE FRAMING, PAINT PT-1 8"x8"x16" SPLIT FACE CONC. BLOCK, SOLID GROUT w/ REINFORCING PER STRUCTURAL (2) 6" DIA GALVANIZED PIPE GATE POST, FILL SOLID WITH CONCRETE, PAINT PT-1; EMBED 2'-0" INTO CONC. FTG. W/ 5/8" DIA. X 6" ANCHOR 3" x 2" x 1/4" STD. STEEL ANGLE, WELD ALL JOINTS & GRIND SMOOTH AEP SPAN METAL SIDING, TO MATCH BUILDING TS 3" x 2" x 1/4" STD STEEL, WELD ALL JOINTS & GRIND SMOOTH (3) GALVANIZED STEEL HINGE COLLARS W/ GREASE FITTINGS, WELD TO GATE ANGLE FRAMING, PAINT PT-1 1" 7/8" STEEL ROD SLIDE STOP TAB PRE-MANUFACTURED METAL GATE HANDLE 1 1/2" X 1/4" FLAT STOCK LOCK TAB TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 9 5 TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE JAMB DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE JAMB DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0" 10 6 TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE JAMB DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE LOCKING HANDLE SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0" 7 1'-6" 3'-0" MIN.
1'-0" 2'-0"
2" CONCRETE CAP 6" DIAMETER STD. GALV. STEEL PIPE FILLED w/ CONCRETE SLOPED CONCRETE BASE CONCRETE FOOTING, REFER TO STRUC. FOR REINFORCEMENT 3'-0"INCREASE DEPTH WHERE FROST DEPTH EXCEEDS 3'-0". REFER TO STRUC. FOR FROST DEPTH. BOLLARD DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 8 7A9.0 6'-0" T.O. WALL 1/2" DIA. x 24"L CANE BOLT LATCH RODS CORRUGATED METAL PAINTED PER PLAN 3/4" PIPE SET INTO CONC. SLAB, 12" DEEP CONC.CURB PER CIVIL DWGS. (3) 3"X1/4" STEEL PLATES WELDED TO METAL DECK 6" DIA. HSS GATE POST FILL SOLID w/ CONCRETE, EMBED 3'-0" INTO CONC. FTG. W/ 5/8" Ø x 6" ANCHOR, PAINT PER PLAN 6" DIA. HSS GATE POST FILL SOLID w/ CONCRETE, EMBED 3'-0" INTO CONC. FTG. W/ 5/8" DIA. x 6" ANCHOR, PAINT PER PLAN CANE BOLT "HOLD-OPEN" TABS TRASH ENCLOSURE MATERIALS ID MATERIAL MANUFACTURER COLOR NOTES 3 SPLIT FACE 8X8X16 MUTUAL MATERIALS/WILLAMETTE STONE CHARCOAL IF INTEGRAL COLOR BLOCK IS UNAVAILABLE, BLOCK TO BE STAINED TO MATCH CMU CAP WILLAMETTE-GRAYSTONE CHARCOAL 12X16X2 PT-2 PAINT SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 8656-11295 - BLDG DB DARK GRAY BLDG DB DARK GRAY, GATES BODY PT-3 PAINT SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 8656-12045 - BLDG DB BLUE BLDG DB BLUE, GATE FRAMES & POSTS 3 6'-0" 20'-0" 4'-0" 8" 10 A9.0 6 A9.0 10 A9.0
5'-6" 6'-0" 4'-0" CL CL CL CL 2 A9.0 3 A9.0 4 A9.0
6'-10"
1" (2) 4'-4" x 5'-8"
STEEL GATES, W/ 6" DIA. HSS GATE POST,
FILLED W/ CONC.; EMBED 36" INTO CONC. FTG. 3'-1" x 5'-2" PEDESTRIAN ACCESS GATE, W/ 4" HSS POSTS, FILLED W/ CONC., EMBED 36" INTO CONC. FTG. DUMPSTER BY GARBAGE SERVICE PROVIDER 6"H x 6"W CONC. CURB AT SIDES OF TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP. 4" THICK, 3000 P.S.I. CONCRETE SLAB WITH 6x6-W1.4x1.4 STL. MESH PROVIDE METAL SLEEVES IN CONC. APRON FOR GATE CANE ANCHORS, TYP. 6" METAL BOLLARD FILLED W/ CONC. 6"H x 6"W CONC. CURB AT SIDES OF TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP. PROVIDE METAL SLEEVES IN CONC. APRON FOR GATE CANE ANCHORS, TYP. 3 1'-6" TYP. 1'-6" TYP.
SLOPE: 1/8" PER FOOT
7'-4" 8'-6"
12'-0" 10'-0"
4" THICK, 3000 P.S.I. CONCRETE SLAB WITH 6x6-W1.4x1.4 STL. MESH (2) 4'-4" x 5'-8" STEEL GATES, W/ 6" DIA. HSS GATE POST, FILLED W/ CONC.; EMBED 36" INTO CONC. FTG. PROVIDE METAL SLEEVES IN CONC. APRON FOR GATE CANE ANCHORS, TYP. PROVIDE METAL SLEEVES IN CONC. APRON FOR GATE CANE ANCHORS, TYP. SIM. 9 A9.0 TYP. 8 1/2" CL CL 6'-0" T.O. WALL HSS GATE POST PAINT PER PLAN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS DOOR, W/ CORRUGATED METAL, PAINTED PER PLAN PROVIDE SIMILAR LOCKING MECHANISM TO MAIN GATE 3 3 FINISH GRADE 6'-0" T.O. WALL 8"x8"x16" SPLIT FACE CONC. BLOCK - SOLID GROUT CELLS w/ #4 @ 24" VERTICAL @ ℄ AND #4 @ 24" HORIZ. PER STRUCT. CALCS GROUT SOLID BELOW GRADE, TYP. 4" 3000 PSI CONC. SLAB #4 @ 16" O.C. TYP. 1'-6" 2'-6" #4 @ 24" O.C. TYP. (ALT. BEND) 32" LAP 2 - #4 CONT. TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN/ ELEVATIONS A9.0 SHEET NAME: SHEET NUMBER: REV: DATE: DESCRIPTION: cARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE & ASSOCIATES, AIA ARCHITECTS 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404 PH 310 452-5533 FAX 310 450-4742 Project No: CA3704
Dutch Bros Coffee - New Freestanding Store
DB2550-A2
JACKSON ST & AVE. 42
INDIO, CA 92203
APN: 692-670-009
ISSUED DATE: 12/06/2021
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2053 of 3061
COLOR/MATERIAL
i'R°oKHE.#EGoF}‘3‘éE BOARDBICKEL GROUP INCORPORATED::°V3::i;°.“:;:5ET’§::';i;:: NEC JACKSON STREET & AVENUE 42 “’e°e“‘*’°”3’ 2°22 P:\16\1 6430 — '0, NEC Jackson & Ave 42\Design\F|oor P: 949.757.0411 F: 949.757.0511
:2 k e I
I
F'|an\X1 O — Floor Plans— Restaurantdwg
www-M INDIO, CALIFORNIA wens. mas.anznuamanlsam mansmacamaat represented by msdrawing are men by.am1 are menrnvenv of exam us’.and was named and aevampsusabmaruse an, and moormecmummemssvscmc pram ammu mt be um, n maneav inper:mmmy mum mmxcnmaywerenot mummyInmded mmmvnmmverlmssm nanEKXELsaw: 4; 2015.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2054 of 3061 METAL PANEL AT TOWER:
WESTERN STATES METAL - WESTERN WAVE, 24 GA
ORIENTATION: HORIZONTAL
METAL PANEL AT BUILDING:
WESTERN STATES METAL - WESTERN WAVE, 24 GA
ORIENTATION: VERTICAL
Dutch Bros Coffee CA3704
Jackson St. & Ave. 42
Indio, CA
COLOR: DUTCH BROS BLUE
COLOR: DUTCH BROS DARK GRAY
COLOR: DUTCH BROS LIGHTGRAY
ARMET DAVIS NEWLOVE ARCHITECTS
/ PHONE: 3|0-773-7772
WAINSCOT SILL
ELDORADO STONE - SNAPPED EDGE
COLOR: PEWTER
STONVENRATINSCOT
ELDORADO STONE
COLOR: BANFF SPRINGS
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2055 of 3061
DRAINAGE STUDY
Indio Shopping Center
APN: 692-670-001, -004, -011, -014 & -017
PROJECT ADDRESS:
NEC Jackson Street & Avenue 42
Frontier Real Estate Investments
31791 Los Rios Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2023
C3 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LLC
10870 W FAIRVIEW AVE
STE 102-1187
BOISE, ID 83713
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2056 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 2 Table of Contents
Section 1 – Project Description ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2 – Drainage Patterns ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Section 3 – Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Section 4 – Hydrology Calculations ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Section 5 – Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2057 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 3 Section 1 – Project Description
This report has been prepared to analyze the hydrological effects of the proposed Multi-Tenant Shopping Center located on the east side of Jackson Street and north side of Avenue 42, within a mixed Community Commercial and Residential Low area of the City of Indio, CA.
Existing Conditions:
The majority of the existing project site is undeveloped with a paved parking lot for the existing Golf Course on the east side of the site and two drive aisles on the western side of the site. All three of the existing driveways, one on Jackson Street and two on Avenue 42, will be utilized for this development.
Proposed Conditions:
The proposed project includes construction of four new buildings, parking lot improvements, drive aisles and landscaping of the perimeter and interior of the site. Three of the new buildings include drive-thrus and one building includes a patio for out seating and dining. A subdivision is included as part of the project. The project includes reuse of the two driveways on Avenue 42 and one of the driveways on Jackson Street. In addition, a new driveway is proposed at the NWC of the property on Jackson Street.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2058 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 4 Section 2 – Drainage Patterns
Existing Drainage Patterns:
The existing site has a natural sheet flow that travels across the entire site, generally from the NWC of the site to the SEC of the site. The highest elevation begins at an existing driveway entrance on Jackson Street at the NWC of the site. Since a majority of the site is undeveloped, storm water is retained onsite or runs off at the SEC of the property.
Proposed Drainage Patterns:
As required by local ordinance, this project is located within a zone that requires 100% retention of storm water onsite. See section 3.5.1.2 of the Whitewater River Region WQMP Guidance document for more details.
The subareas within the project are listed below:
Drainage Area 1 consist of the driveway entrance on Jackson Street and the drive-thru for Building 1. Runoff in this area sheet flows to the curb and gutter, and then discharges into a catch basin. This catch basin is then piped to an ADS Storm-Tech Infiltration System that has been sized for 100% retention. The product used will be Storm Tech MC-4500 chamber systems. Dimensions are provided in the Appendix. Storm water will infiltrate back into the gravel and soil below.
Drainage Area 2 consists of Building 1, the parking lot and adjacent landscape areas. Runoff sheet flows across the pavement to one of the two catch basins located along the curb and gutter. Each catch basin is piped to an underground infiltration system. The product type used in this drainage area is the ADS Storm-Tech MC-4500.
Dimensions are provided in the Appendix. Storm water will infiltrate back into the gravel and soil below.
Drainage Area 3 sheet flows across a section of the parking lot for Building 2. The storm water drains into a catch basin and is then piped into an underground infiltration system. Due to poor soil infiltration characteristics of the soil in this area, dry wells will be used in addition to an ADS Storm-Tech system to help infiltrate soil into the ground within 72-hrs of capture. Dimensions and design for the underground infiltration system and dry well structure are provided in the Appendix.
Drainage area 4 is south of drainage area 3, and consists of the Building 2 area, adjacent sidewalk, landscaping, and the balance of the parking area for this lot. Runoff is first collected via roof rains then sheet flows across the sidewalk and pavement, and then collected into one of the two catch basins in this area. One catch basin is located adjacent to a curb and gutter, and the second it located in the middle of the parking stalls. These two catch basins are connected by a storm drain pipe, which drains into the underground infiltration system. Due to poor soil infiltration characteristics, two dry well structures will be utilized once the underground infiltration system is filled. Dimensions and design of the underground infiltration system and dry-well structure are provided in the Appendix.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2059 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 5 Drainage Area 5 consists of Building A, adjacent sidewalk, landscaping, drive-thru lanes, and a parking lot.
Runoff will be collected at three separate catch basins. Runoff sheet flows across the pavement into a gutter where is then collected in three separate catch basins. From these catch basins, runoff is then piped into an underground infiltration system. Due to sizing limitation on the underground infiltration system, a dry-well is also proposed to assist with infiltration of storm water into the ground.
Drainage Area 6 includes Building 3, drive-thru lanes, the parking lot and adjacent landscaping within the Lot.
Runoff in the area is captured in 4 different catch basins. Runoff in all catch basins is then piped to a proposed underground infiltration system. Due to poor soil infiltration characteristics of the soil in this area, dry wells will be used in addition to an ADS Storm-Tech system to help infiltrate soil into the ground within 72-hrs of capture.
Drainage Area 7 includes the driveway entrance on Avenue 42, golf course parking lot and adjacent landscaping.
This drainage area is a separate legal lot from the balance of the project. There are a total of 2 catch basins in this drainage area. Runoff in this area sheet flows to a curb and gutter or v-gutter, and then to one of the two catch basins. From the catch basins, storm water will be piped to an underground infiltration system.
Run-On:
There is no run-on of offsite drainage onto or through this property.
Hydromodification:
The project is required to retain 100% of the stormwater within the limits of the project.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2060 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 6 Section 3 – Methodology
RUNOFF DETERMINATION METHODS
The two primary methods used in the Riverside County area to determine design discharges are the Rational Method and the Unit Hydrograph method. For the purposes of this report, we will be using the SCS T-20 Unit Hydrograph method to determine volumes, peak flows, and routing. Volumes are determined from the Type I 24- hour distribution.
UNIT HYDROGRAPH METHOD
This method is basically the same approach as used in the original TR-20. There are four steps involved:
1. NRCS 24-hr distribution is used for the design storm.
2. A Unit Hydrograph is constructed based on the drainage area’s characteristics, i.e., Curve Number (CN), Tc, etc.
3. The Design Storm is applied to the Unit Hydrograph by multiplying each ordinate of the Design Storm (after it has been converted to an excess hyetograph) by each ordinate of the Unit Hydrograph, creating a series of Individual Hydrographs each produced from the rainfall during the specified Time Interval.
4. The Individual Hydrographs are summed to create the Final Runoff Hydrograph.
This method is also used to design the appropriate sizing for the underground infiltrate systems used for each drainage area to capture the maximum storm water, taking into account soil infiltration rates.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2061 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 7 Section 4 – Hydrology Calculations
See the Appendix for complete calculations for the existing and proposed site hydrology.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2062 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 8 Section 5 – Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the storage required for each underground infiltration system such that the total runoff from the site during a 72- hour storm event is captured on-site.
As shown in the calculations, runoff from the project will be retained within the development of the project.
Since the project is able to maintain all runoff onsite, there will be no adverse effects on adjacent properties.
Calculations from the Hydraulic Analysis report are included in the Appendix.
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2063 of 3061 C3 Civil Engineering, LLC · 10870 W Fairview Ave, Ste 102-1187, Boise, ID 83713 ·̴ 208-918-0928 9 Appendix
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2064 of 3061 G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G DA 1 1.324ac DA 2 4.85ac DA 3 1.78ac DA 4 0.218ac DA 5 0.319 ac DA 6 0.134 ac PROFESSIONAL SEAL # DATE DESCRIPTION REVISION RECORD SHEET NUMBER
NEC OF JACKSON ST & AVENUE 42
INDIO, CA
THE GREENS INDIO of 12 C3 CIVIL
N N G I N G I R
10870 W. FAIRVIEW DR
STE 102-1187
BOISE, ID 83713
(208) 918-0928
[email protected]
www.c3civileng.com DATE: 09/11/2023 SHEET TITLE C3 JOB NO: 22-031 DRAWN BY: TH CHECKED BY: TH n
0 50 100 SCALE: 1:50 EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP Tc=TIME OF CONCENTRATION S=SLOPE L=LENGTH OF SUBAREA FLOW PATH BASIN LIMITS FLOW DIRECTION FLOW PATH SUBAREA DESIGNATION AREA (ac) X X.XXXac 10 AVENUE 42
JACKSON ST
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2065 of 3061
W W W W W W W
G
W
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G NO PARKING BLDG 3 FF=493.35 BLDG 2 FF=493.50 BLDG A FF=492.46 BLDG 1 FF=495.10 DA 1 0.300ac DA 4 0.841ac DA 6 1.973ac DA 5 0.838ac DA 7 2.485ac DA 2 0.988ac DA 3 0.532ac DA 10 0.134 ac DA 9 0.319 ac DA 8 0.218ac PROFESSIONAL SEAL # DATE DESCRIPTION REVISION RECORD SHEET NUMBER
NEC OF JACKSON ST & AVENUE 42
INDIO, CA
THE GREENS INDIO of 12 C3 CIVIL
N N G I N G I R
10870 W. FAIRVIEW DR
STE 102-1187
BOISE, ID 83713
(208) 918-0928
[email protected]
www.c3civileng.com DATE: 09/11/2023 SHEET TITLE C3 JOB NO: 22-031 DRAWN BY: TH CHECKED BY: TH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN n
0 50 100 SCALE: 1:50 11 AVENUE 42
JACKSON ST Tc=TIME OF CONCENTRATION S=SLOPE L=LENGTH OF SUBAREA FLOW PATH BASIN LIMITS FLOW DIRECTION FLOW PATH SUBAREA DESIGNATION AREA (ac) X X.XXXac
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2066 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2067 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2068 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2069 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2070 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2071 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2072 of 3061
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2073 of 3061 DA-1
DA-1
DA-2
DA-2
DA-3
DA-3
DA-4
DA-4
DA-5
DA-5
DA-6
DA-6
DA-7
DA-7
1P
UIS-1
2P
UIS-2
3P
UIS-3
4P
UIS-4
5P
UIS-5
6P
UIS-6
7P
UIS-7
Routing Diagram for 22031- PR- Drainage
Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2074 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes)
Area
(acres)
CN Description
(subcatchment-numbers)
2.558 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA-1, DA-2, DA-3, DA-4, DA-5, DA-6, DA-7)
5.329 98 Paved parking, HSG A (DA-1, DA-2, DA-3, DA-4, DA-5, DA-6, DA-7)
7.887 86 TOTAL AREA
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2075 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes)
Area
(acres)
Soil
Group
Subcatchment
Numbers
5.329 HSG A DA-1, DA-2, DA-3, DA-4, DA-5, DA-6, DA-7
2.558 HSG B DA-1, DA-2, DA-3, DA-4, DA-5, DA-6, DA-7
0.000 HSG C
0.000 HSG D
0.000 Other
7.887 TOTAL AREA
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2076 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes)
HSG-A
(acres)
HSG-B
(acres)
HSG-C
(acres)
HSG-D
(acres)
Other
(acres)
Total
(acres)
Ground
Cover
Subcatchment
Numbers
0.000 2.558 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.558 >75% Grass cover, Good DA-1, DA-2,
DA-3,
DA-4,
DA-5,
DA-6,
DA-7
5.329 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.329 Paved parking DA-1, DA-2,
DA-3,
DA-4,
DA-5,
DA-6,
DA-7
5.329 2.558 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.887 TOTAL AREA
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2077 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Pond 1P: UIS-1 Peak Elev=495.82' Storage=0.048 af Inflow=0.71 cfs 0.066 af Outflow=0.02 cfs 0.018 af
Pond 2P: UIS-2 Peak Elev=493.06' Storage=0.178 af Inflow=2.75 cfs 0.252 af Outflow=0.06 cfs 0.075 af
Pond 3P: UIS-3 Peak Elev=487.30' Storage=0.071 af Inflow=1.60 cfs 0.143 af Outflow=0.07 cfs 0.076 af
Pond 4P: UIS-4 Peak Elev=486.86' Storage=0.107 af Inflow=2.48 cfs 0.221 af Outflow=0.11 cfs 0.120 af
Pond 5P: UIS-5 Peak Elev=486.20' Storage=0.126 af Inflow=2.23 cfs 0.201 af Outflow=0.07 cfs 0.075 af
Pond 6P: UIS-6 Peak Elev=484.84' Storage=0.310 af Inflow=4.89 cfs 0.486 af Outflow=0.16 cfs 0.176 af
Pond 7P: UIS-7 Peak Elev=488.48' Storage=0.282 af Inflow=4.32 cfs 0.411 af Outflow=0.13 cfs 0.129 af
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2078 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Pond 1P: UIS-1
[82] Warning: Early inflow requires earlier time span
Inflow Area = 0.300 ac, 66.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.62" for INDIO event Inflow = 0.71 cfs @ 9.96 hrs, Volume= 0.066 af
Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 602.5 min Discarded = 0.02 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 495.82' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 0.013 ac Storage= 0.048 af Plug-Flow detention time= 243.7 min calculated for 0.018 af (27% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 68.3 min ( 789.6 - 721.3 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 490.32' 0.023 af 10.33'W x 55.77'L x 6.75'H Field A
0.089 af Overall - 0.031 af Embedded = 0.058 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 491.07' 0.031 af ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap x 12 Inside #1 Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.5 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap Cap Storage= +39.5 cf x 2 x 1 rows = 79.0 cf
0.054 af Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 490.32' 1.170 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 10.00'
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.02 cfs @ 20.00 hrs HW=495.82' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.02 cfs)
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2079 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Pond 1P: UIS-1 - Chamber Wizard Field A
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap (ADS StormTech® MC-4500 with cap volume) Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.5 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap Cap Storage= +39.5 cf x 2 x 1 rows = 79.0 cf
12 Chambers/Row x 4.02' Long +2.73' Cap Length x 2 = 53.77' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 55.77' Base Length
1 Rows x 100.0" Wide + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.33' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 60.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 6.75' Field Height 12 Chambers x 106.5 cf + 39.5 cf Cap Volume x 2 x 1 Rows = 1,356.9 cf Chamber Storage 3,889.7 cf Field - 1,356.9 cf Chambers = 2,532.8 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,013.1 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,370.0 cf = 0.054 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 60.9%
Overall System Size = 55.77' x 10.33' x 6.75'
12 Chambers
144.1 cy Field
93.8 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2080 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Pond 1P: UIS-1
Inflow
Discarded
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Flow (cfs)
0.8 0.75
0.7 0.65
0.6 0.55
0.5 0.45
0.4 0.35
0.3 0.25
0.2 0.15
0.1 0.05
0 Inflow Area=0.300 ac
Peak Elev=495.82'
Storage=0.048 af
0.71 cfs
0.02 cfs
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2081 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Hydrograph for Pond 1P: UIS-1
Time
(hours)
Inflow
(cfs)
Storage
(acre-feet)
Elevation
(feet)
Discarded
(cfs)
5.00 0.00 0.000 490.32 0.00
5.50 0.00 0.000 490.34 0.00
6.00 0.01 0.000 490.34 0.01
6.50 0.01 0.000 490.35 0.01
7.00 0.01 0.000 490.37 0.01
7.50 0.02 0.000 490.39 0.02
8.00 0.02 0.001 490.42 0.02
8.50 0.03 0.001 490.50 0.02
9.00 0.05 0.002 490.72 0.02
9.50 0.09 0.004 491.10 0.02
10.00 0.67 0.017 492.30 0.02
10.50 0.12 0.026 493.17 0.02
11.00 0.08 0.029 493.51 0.02
11.50 0.07 0.031 493.77 0.02
12.00 0.06 0.033 494.00 0.02
12.50 0.06 0.035 494.20 0.02
13.00 0.05 0.037 494.37 0.02
13.50 0.05 0.038 494.53 0.02
14.00 0.04 0.039 494.66 0.02
14.50 0.04 0.040 494.77 0.02
15.00 0.04 0.041 494.89 0.02
15.50 0.04 0.042 494.99 0.02
16.00 0.04 0.043 495.10 0.02
16.50 0.03 0.044 495.20 0.02
17.00 0.03 0.044 495.30 0.02
17.50 0.03 0.045 495.39 0.02
18.00 0.03 0.046 495.48 0.02
18.50 0.03 0.046 495.57 0.02
19.00 0.03 0.047 495.66 0.02
19.50 0.03 0.047 495.74 0.02
20.00 0.03 0.048 495.82 0.02
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2082 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Pond 2P: UIS-2
[82] Warning: Early inflow requires earlier time span
Inflow Area = 0.988 ac, 77.23% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.06" for INDIO event Inflow = 2.75 cfs @ 9.95 hrs, Volume= 0.252 af
Outflow = 0.06 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 602.7 min Discarded = 0.06 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 493.06' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 0.053 ac Storage= 0.178 af Plug-Flow detention time= 242.3 min calculated for 0.075 af (30% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 67.5 min ( 771.5 - 704.0 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 488.07' 0.076 af 37.58'W x 50.80'L x 6.75'H Field A
0.296 af Overall - 0.105 af Embedded = 0.191 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 488.82' 0.105 af ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap x 40 Inside #1 Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.5 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap 40 Chambers in 4 Rows
Cap Storage= +39.5 cf x 2 x 4 rows = 316.0 cf
#3B 488.07' 0.017 af 10.33'W x 38.73'L x 6.75'H Field B
0.062 af Overall - 0.019 af Embedded = 0.043 af x 40.0% Voids #4B 488.82' 0.019 af ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap x 7 Inside #3 Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.5 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap Cap Storage= +39.5 cf x 2 x 1 rows = 79.0 cf
0.218 af Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 488.07' 1.170 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 10.00'
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.06 cfs @ 20.00 hrs HW=493.06' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration ( Controls 0.06 cfs)
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2083 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Pond 2P: UIS-2 - Chamber Wizard Field A
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap (ADS StormTech® MC-4500 with cap volume) Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.5 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap Cap Storage= +39.5 cf x 2 x 4 rows = 316.0 cf
100.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing = 109.0" C-C Row Spacing
10 Chambers/Row x 4.02' Long +2.73' Cap Length x 2 = 45.72' Row Length +30.5" End Stone x 2 = 50.80' Base Length
4 Rows x 100.0" Wide + 9.0" Spacing x 3 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 37.58' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 60.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 6.75' Field Height 40 Chambers x 106.5 cf + 39.5 cf Cap Volume x 2 x 4 Rows = 4,575.6 cf Chamber Storage 12,887.3 cf Field - 4,575.6 cf Chambers = 8,311.7 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 3,324.7 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 7,900.3 cf = 0.181 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 61.3%
Overall System Size = 50.80' x 37.58' x 6.75'
40 Chambers
477.3 cy Field
307.8 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2084 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Pond 2P: UIS-2 - Chamber Wizard Field B
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech MC-4500 b +Cap (ADS StormTech® MC-4500 with cap volume) Effective Size= 90.4"W x 60.0"H => 26.46 sf x 4.03'L = 106.5 cf Overall Size= 100.0"W x 60.0"H x 4.33'L with 0.31' Overlap Cap Storage= +39.5 cf x 2 x 1 rows = 79.0 cf
7 Chambers/Row x 4.02' Long +2.73' Cap Length x 2 = 33.64' Row Length +30.5" End Stone x 2 = 38.73' Base Length
1 Rows x 100.0" Wide + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.33' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 60.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 6.75' Field Height 7 Chambers x 106.5 cf + 39.5 cf Cap Volume x 2 x 1 Rows = 824.4 cf Chamber Storage 2,701.1 cf Field - 824.4 cf Chambers = 1,876.6 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 750.7 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 1,575.1 cf = 0.036 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 58.3%
Overall System Size = 38.73' x 10.33' x 6.75'
7 Chambers
100.0 cy Field
69.5 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2085 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Pond 2P: UIS-2
Inflow
Discarded
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Flow (cfs)
3 2
1 0
Inflow Area=0.988 ac
Peak Elev=493.06'
Storage=0.178 af
2.75 cfs
0.06 cfs
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2086 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Hydrograph for Pond 2P: UIS-2
Time
(hours)
Inflow
(cfs)
Storage
(acre-feet)
Elevation
(feet)
Discarded
(cfs)
5.00 0.03 0.000 488.07 0.00
5.50 0.04 0.001 488.10 0.03
6.00 0.05 0.001 488.12 0.04
6.50 0.06 0.001 488.13 0.05
7.00 0.08 0.002 488.15 0.06
7.50 0.09 0.003 488.20 0.06
8.00 0.10 0.004 488.27 0.06
8.50 0.16 0.007 488.40 0.06
9.00 0.24 0.013 488.66 0.06
9.50 0.37 0.022 488.97 0.06
10.00 2.52 0.072 490.17 0.06
10.50 0.43 0.104 490.97 0.06
11.00 0.30 0.116 491.28 0.06
11.50 0.26 0.125 491.51 0.06
12.00 0.22 0.132 491.70 0.06
12.50 0.20 0.138 491.87 0.06
13.00 0.18 0.144 492.02 0.06
13.50 0.16 0.148 492.15 0.06
14.00 0.14 0.152 492.26 0.06
14.50 0.14 0.155 492.35 0.06
15.00 0.13 0.158 492.43 0.06
15.50 0.13 0.160 492.52 0.06
16.00 0.12 0.163 492.59 0.06
16.50 0.12 0.165 492.67 0.06
17.00 0.12 0.168 492.74 0.06
17.50 0.11 0.170 492.80 0.06
18.00 0.11 0.172 492.86 0.06
18.50 0.10 0.173 492.92 0.06
19.00 0.10 0.175 492.97 0.06
19.50 0.09 0.176 493.02 0.06
20.00 0.09 0.178 493.06 0.06
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2087 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Pond 3P: UIS-3
[82] Warning: Early inflow requires earlier time span
Inflow Area = 0.531 ac, 84.37% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.24" for INDIO event Inflow = 1.60 cfs @ 9.94 hrs, Volume= 0.143 af
Outflow = 0.07 cfs @ 15.93 hrs, Volume= 0.076 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 359.6 min Discarded = 0.07 cfs @ 15.93 hrs, Volume= 0.076 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 487.30' @ 15.93 hrs Surf.Area= 0.155 ac Storage= 0.071 af Plug-Flow detention time= 233.5 min calculated for 0.076 af (53% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 95.2 min ( 791.8 - 696.6 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 486.35' 0.050 af 35.33'W x 73.67'L x 2.50'H Field A
0.149 af Overall - 0.025 af Embedded = 0.124 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 487.10' 0.025 af ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap x 160 Inside #1 Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 160 Chambers in 16 Rows
#3B 486.35' 0.030 af 31.50'W x 45.92'L x 2.83'H Field B
0.094 af Overall - 0.018 af Embedded = 0.076 af x 40.0% Voids #4B 487.10' 0.018 af ADS_StormTech SC-310 +Cap x 54 Inside #3 Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.12'L = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 54 Chambers in 9 Rows
#5C 486.35' 0.003 af 10.33'W x 16.71'L x 2.50'H Field C
0.010 af Overall - 0.001 af Embedded = 0.009 af x 40.0% Voids #6C 487.10' 0.001 af ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap x 8 Inside #5 Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 8 Chambers in 4 Rows
#7D 486.35' 0.049 af 24.92'W x 102.15'L x 2.50'H Field D
0.146 af Overall - 0.024 af Embedded = 0.122 af x 40.0% Voids #8D 487.10' 0.024 af ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap x 154 Inside #7 Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 154 Chambers in 11 Rows
0.201 af Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group C created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group D created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 486.35' 0.160 in/hr Exfiltration- ADS over Wetted area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 420.00'
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2088 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 #2 Discarded 486.35' 0.04 cfs Exfiltration- DRY WELL at all elevations Discarded OutFlow Max=0.07 cfs @ 15.93 hrs HW=487.30' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration- ADS ( Controls 0.03 cfs)
2=Exfiltration- DRY WELL (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs)
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2089 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Pond 3P: UIS-3 - Chamber Wizard Field A
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC-160LP with cap length) Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 10 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.23' Cap Length x 2 = 71.67' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 73.67' Base Length
16 Rows x 25.0" Wide + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 35.33' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 12.0" Chamber Height + 9.0" Stone Cover = 2.50' Field Height 160 Chambers x 6.8 cf = 1,093.9 cf Chamber Storage
6,507.2 cf Field - 1,093.9 cf Chambers = 5,413.3 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,165.3 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,259.2 cf = 0.075 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 50.1%
Overall System Size = 73.67' x 35.33' x 2.50'
160 Chambers
241.0 cy Field
200.5 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2090 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Pond 3P: UIS-3 - Chamber Wizard Field B
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC-310 +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC-310 with cap length) Effective Size= 28.9"W x 16.0"H => 2.07 sf x 7.12'L = 14.7 cf Overall Size= 34.0"W x 16.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap
34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing = 40.0" C-C Row Spacing
6 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.60' Cap Length x 2 = 43.92' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 45.92' Base Length
9 Rows x 34.0" Wide + 6.0" Spacing x 8 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 31.50' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 16.0" Chamber Height + 9.0" Stone Cover = 2.83' Field Height 54 Chambers x 14.7 cf = 796.1 cf Chamber Storage
4,098.4 cf Field - 796.1 cf Chambers = 3,302.3 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,320.9 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 2,117.0 cf = 0.049 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 51.7%
Overall System Size = 45.92' x 31.50' x 2.83'
54 Chambers
151.8 cy Field
122.3 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2091 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Pond 3P: UIS-3 - Chamber Wizard Field C
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC-160LP with cap length) Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 2 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.23' Cap Length x 2 = 14.71' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 16.71' Base Length
4 Rows x 25.0" Wide + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.33' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 12.0" Chamber Height + 9.0" Stone Cover = 2.50' Field Height 8 Chambers x 6.8 cf = 54.7 cf Chamber Storage
431.6 cf Field - 54.7 cf Chambers = 376.9 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 150.8 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 205.5 cf = 0.005 af
Overall Storage Efficiency = 47.6%
Overall System Size = 16.71' x 10.33' x 2.50'
8 Chambers
16.0 cy Field
14.0 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2092 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Pond 3P: UIS-3 - Chamber Wizard Field D
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC-160LP with cap length) Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 14 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.23' Cap Length x 2 = 100.15' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 102.15' Base Length
11 Rows x 25.0" Wide + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 24.92' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 12.0" Chamber Height + 9.0" Stone Cover = 2.50' Field Height 154 Chambers x 6.8 cf = 1,052.9 cf Chamber Storage
6,362.9 cf Field - 1,052.9 cf Chambers = 5,310.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 2,124.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,176.9 cf = 0.073 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 49.9%
Overall System Size = 102.15' x 24.92' x 2.50'
154 Chambers
235.7 cy Field
196.7 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2093 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Pond 3P: UIS-3
Inflow
Discarded
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Flow (cfs)
1 0
Inflow Area=0.531 ac
Peak Elev=487.30'
Storage=0.071 af
1.60 cfs
0.07 cfs
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2094 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Hydrograph for Pond 3P: UIS-3
Time
(hours)
Inflow
(cfs)
Storage
(acre-feet)
Elevation
(feet)
Discarded
(cfs)
5.00 0.02 0.000 486.35 0.00
5.50 0.03 0.001 486.36 0.02
6.00 0.03 0.001 486.36 0.03
6.50 0.04 0.001 486.37 0.04
7.00 0.05 0.001 486.37 0.04
7.50 0.06 0.001 486.37 0.05
8.00 0.07 0.002 486.38 0.06
8.50 0.10 0.002 486.39 0.07
9.00 0.14 0.005 486.42 0.07
9.50 0.22 0.009 486.50 0.07
10.00 1.34 0.038 486.97 0.07
10.50 0.23 0.053 487.16 0.07
11.00 0.16 0.058 487.20 0.07
11.50 0.14 0.062 487.22 0.07
12.00 0.12 0.064 487.25 0.07
12.50 0.11 0.067 487.26 0.07
13.00 0.10 0.068 487.28 0.07
13.50 0.09 0.069 487.29 0.07
14.00 0.08 0.070 487.29 0.07
14.50 0.07 0.070 487.29 0.07
15.00 0.07 0.070 487.30 0.07
15.50 0.07 0.071 487.30 0.07
16.00 0.07 0.071 487.30 0.07
16.50 0.07 0.070 487.30 0.07
17.00 0.06 0.070 487.30 0.07
17.50 0.06 0.070 487.29 0.07
18.00 0.06 0.070 487.29 0.07
18.50 0.06 0.069 487.29 0.07
19.00 0.05 0.069 487.28 0.07
19.50 0.05 0.068 487.28 0.07
20.00 0.05 0.067 487.27 0.07
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2095 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Pond 4P: UIS-4
[82] Warning: Early inflow requires earlier time span
Inflow Area = 0.843 ac, 81.26% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.15" for INDIO event Inflow = 2.48 cfs @ 9.94 hrs, Volume= 0.221 af
Outflow = 0.11 cfs @ 15.87 hrs, Volume= 0.120 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 355.6 min Discarded = 0.11 cfs @ 15.87 hrs, Volume= 0.120 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 486.86' @ 15.87 hrs Surf.Area= 0.145 ac Storage= 0.107 af Plug-Flow detention time= 230.0 min calculated for 0.119 af (54% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 92.7 min ( 792.6 - 699.9 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 485.49' 0.083 af 50.25'W x 76.67'L x 2.75'H Field A
0.243 af Overall - 0.036 af Embedded = 0.207 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 486.24' 0.036 af ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap x 230 Inside #1 Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 230 Chambers in 23 Rows
#3B 485.49' 0.030 af 50.25'W x 26.83'L x 2.75'H Field B
0.085 af Overall - 0.011 af Embedded = 0.074 af x 40.0% Voids #4B 486.24' 0.011 af ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap x 69 Inside #3 Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 69 Chambers in 23 Rows
#5C 485.49' 0.024 af 10.67'W x 103.48'L x 2.75'H Field C
0.070 af Overall - 0.009 af Embedded = 0.061 af x 40.0% Voids #6C 486.24' 0.009 af ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap x 56 Inside #5 Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 56 Chambers in 4 Rows
0.193 af Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group C created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 485.49' 0.160 in/hr Exfiltration-ADS over Wetted area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 420.00'
#2 Discarded 485.49' 0.04 cfs Exfiltration- Drywell X 2.00 at all elevations Discarded OutFlow Max=0.11 cfs @ 15.87 hrs HW=486.86' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration-ADS ( Controls 0.03 cfs)
2=Exfiltration- Drywell (Exfiltration Controls 0.08 cfs)
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2096 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Pond 4P: UIS-4 - Chamber Wizard Field A
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC-160LP with cap length) Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 10 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.23' Cap Length x 2 = 71.67' Row Length +30.0" End Stone x 2 = 76.67' Base Length
23 Rows x 25.0" Wide + 14.0" Side Stone x 2 = 50.25' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 12.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 2.75' Field Height 230 Chambers x 6.8 cf = 1,572.5 cf Chamber Storage
10,594.4 cf Field - 1,572.5 cf Chambers = 9,021.9 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 3,608.7 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 5,181.3 cf = 0.119 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 48.9%
Overall System Size = 76.67' x 50.25' x 2.75'
230 Chambers
392.4 cy Field
334.1 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2097 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Pond 4P: UIS-4 - Chamber Wizard Field B
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC-160LP with cap length) Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 3 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.23' Cap Length x 2 = 21.83' Row Length +30.0" End Stone x 2 = 26.83' Base Length
23 Rows x 25.0" Wide + 14.0" Side Stone x 2 = 50.25' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 12.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 2.75' Field Height 69 Chambers x 6.8 cf = 471.8 cf Chamber Storage
3,707.1 cf Field - 471.8 cf Chambers = 3,235.4 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,294.1 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 1,765.9 cf = 0.041 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 47.6%
Overall System Size = 26.83' x 50.25' x 2.75'
69 Chambers
137.3 cy Field
119.8 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2098 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Pond 4P: UIS-4 - Chamber Wizard Field C
Chamber Model = ADS_StormTech SC-160LP +Cap (ADS StormTech® SC-160LP with cap length) Effective Size= 18.0"W x 12.0"H => 0.96 sf x 7.12'L = 6.8 cf Overall Size= 25.0"W x 12.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 14 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.23' Cap Length x 2 = 100.15' Row Length +20.0" End Stone x 2 = 103.48' Base Length
4 Rows x 25.0" Wide + 14.0" Side Stone x 2 = 10.67' Base Width
9.0" Stone Base + 12.0" Chamber Height + 12.0" Stone Cover = 2.75' Field Height 56 Chambers x 6.8 cf = 382.9 cf Chamber Storage
3,035.4 cf Field - 382.9 cf Chambers = 2,652.5 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 1,061.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 1,443.9 cf = 0.033 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 47.6%
Overall System Size = 103.48' x 10.67' x 2.75'
56 Chambers
112.4 cy Field
98.2 cy Stone
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2099 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Pond 4P: UIS-4
Inflow
Discarded
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Flow (cfs)
2 1
0 Inflow Area=0.843 ac
Peak Elev=486.86'
Storage=0.107 af
2.48 cfs
0.11 cfs
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2100 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Hydrograph for Pond 4P: UIS-4
Time
(hours)
Inflow
(cfs)
Storage
(acre-feet)
Elevation
(feet)
Discarded
(cfs)
5.00 0.03 0.000 485.49 0.00
5.50 0.04 0.001 485.50 0.04
6.00 0.04 0.001 485.50 0.04
6.50 0.06 0.001 485.50 0.05
7.00 0.08 0.001 485.51 0.07
7.50 0.09 0.001 485.51 0.08
8.00 0.10 0.001 485.51 0.09
8.50 0.15 0.002 485.53 0.10
9.00 0.21 0.005 485.58 0.10
9.50 0.33 0.012 485.70 0.10
10.00 2.07 0.057 486.37 0.11
10.50 0.36 0.080 486.59 0.11
11.00 0.25 0.088 486.66 0.11
11.50 0.22 0.093 486.72 0.11
12.00 0.19 0.098 486.76 0.11
12.50 0.17 0.101 486.79 0.11
13.00 0.16 0.103 486.82 0.11
13.50 0.14 0.105 486.84 0.11
14.00 0.12 0.106 486.85 0.11
14.50 0.12 0.106 486.85 0.11
15.00 0.11 0.107 486.86 0.11
15.50 0.11 0.107 486.86 0.11
16.00 0.11 0.107 486.86 0.11
16.50 0.10 0.107 486.86 0.11
17.00 0.10 0.107 486.86 0.11
17.50 0.10 0.106 486.85 0.11
18.00 0.09 0.106 486.85 0.11
18.50 0.09 0.105 486.84 0.11
19.00 0.08 0.104 486.83 0.11
19.50 0.08 0.103 486.82 0.11
20.00 0.08 0.102 486.81 0.11
Resolution Nos. 10405, No. 10406, No. 10407, and No. 10409 and Ordinance... Page 2101 of 3061 22-031- Hydro CAD- Post Drainage Study
22031- PR- Drainage Type I 24-hr INDIO Rainfall=4.50"
Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 3/24/2023 HydroCAD® 10.10-5a s/n 11911 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29 Summary for Pond 5P: UIS-5
[82] Warning: Early inflow requires earlier time span
Inflow Area = 0.837 ac, 73.95% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.89" for INDIO event Inflow = 2.23 cfs @ 9.95 hrs, Volume= 0.201 af
Outflow = 0.07 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af, Atten= 97%, Lag= 603.1 min Discarded = 0.07 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 486.20' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 0.146 ac Storage= 0.126 af Plug-Flow detention time= 252.5 min calculated for 0.075 af (37% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 91.7 min ( 802.2 - 710.5 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1A 484.74' 0.099 af 34.75'W x 101.34'L x 4.25'H Field A
0.344 af Overall - 0.096 af Embedded = 0.248 af x 40.0% Voids #2A 485.49' 0.096 af ADS_StormTech SC-740 +Cap x 91 Inside #1 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 91 Chambers in 7 Rows
#3B 484.74' 0.014 af 5.25'W x 94.22'L x 4.25'H Field B
0.048 af Overall - 0.013 af Embedded = 0.036 af x 40.0% Voids #4B 485.49' 0.013 af ADS_StormTech SC-740 +Cap x 12 Inside #3 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap #5C 484.74' 0.067 af 25.25'W x 93.22'L x 4.25'H Field C
0.230 af Overall - 0.063 af Embedded = 0.166 af x 40.0% Voids #6C 485.49' 0.063 af ADS_StormTech SC-740 +Cap x 60 Inside #5 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap 60 Chambers in 5 Rows
0.352 af Total Available Storage
Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard
Storage Group C created with Chamber Wizard
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 484.74' 0.400 in/hr Exfiltration- ADS over Wetted area Conductivity to Groundwater Elevation = 420.00'
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.07 cfs @ 20.00 hrs HW=486.20' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration- ADS ( Controls 0.07 cfs)