Agenda — Indio City Council, July 17, 2024 (part 5 of 12)

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 538 of 1671

SELF-STORAGELANDUSE
For the purpose of this document, the term "self-storage facility” includes establishments that offer storage in an enclosed building, with access to storage units only from the interior of the building. These facilities are referenced as "internalized community storage” in the city’s Zoning Ordinance and can also be referred to as miniwarehouses.

DESIGNOBJECTIVES
For decades, the site planning and aesthetic design evaluation through the Development Review process has instrumentally shaped the community. Quality design is seamlessly woven into the surrounding context, both respecting and enhancing its surroundings. Another measure of quality design is its functionality and durability. A building should be constructed with both the present and the future in mind. Certain materials and construction methods should be used to create a building that willwithstand the test of time. A design can be measured by what it contributes to the community. Quality design should not only meet individual needs but should also achieve the objectives of the greater city.

These Self-Storage Facilities Design Guidelines provide the framework that guides individual developments as they visually and physicallywork together to define, shape, and enhance the image of Scottsdale. A portion of the design objectives found in these guidelines have been retained from earlier, community-created design goals, while others include updated language or represent completely new concepts. Collectively, these design objectives establish the community's aesthetic vision for self—storage facilities The design objectives for self—storage facilities include:

Cohesive/y integrate self-storage facilitiesinto the fabricofthe built environment.

Mitigate potential unwanted impacts fromself—storagefacilitieson adjacent properties, especially adjacent residential properties.

Limit the use ofcorporate identificationin the building design ofself—storagefacilities.

Promote the use ofhigh-quality design consistent with other buildings in Scottsdale.

Encourage property improvements to fosterthe overall economic prosperity ofScottsdale.

PURPOSE OF GUIDELINES
Design guidelines implement policies of the General Plan and Character Area Plans and serve as a tool to help provide clarity to the community’s values and expectation for certain uses and/or building typology. During the design process, creativity and innovation are encouraged, thus these Guidelines are intended to be ?exible, and to act as a tool to guide innovative, quality design. The Guidelines are meant to encourage and promote unique solutions to design opportunities and challenges. In conjunction with the Sensitive Design Principles, the Zoning Ordinance, and the Design Standards and Policies Manual (DSPM), the Guidelines direct design in a way that accounts for the larger context, complements the established character, encourages thoughtful design, mitigates potential impacts, and upholds the values of the community.

Page 153 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 539 of 1671

SITEDESIGN(SD

ENSURE CONTINUITYOF SITEDEVELOPMENT(SURROUNDINGCONTEXT) SD1. The site plan, building arrangement, and orientation ofuses should coordinate with neighboring properties and respect and enhance Scottsdale’s Sonoran Desert environment.

SD1.1. Ensure site development is compatible and complements the existing development pattern of the neighborhood surrounding the site, including established building setbacks, landscape buffers, site access and placement of building functions. (Context Compatibility)
SD1.2. ReSpect adjacent properties with design and site planning to minimize disrupting the privacy and outdoor activities of residents in adjacent buildings. (Context Compatibility)
SD13. Incorporate Scottsdale’s Sensitive Design Principles into the site design. (Sonoran Desert)

PROVIDEAPPROPRIATEACCESSAND EFFICIENTON-SITECIRCULATION SDZ. Promote e?‘icientvehicular access.

SD2.1. The consolidation of site entrances is encouraged, where appropriate. (Appropriate Access)
SD2.2. Choose locations for vehicular access and service access that avoids potential con- ?icts with pedestrian circulation. (Appropriate Access) (Safe Design) SD3. Ensure adequate safety and security ofthe site.

SD3.1. Create a safe environment by providing lines of sight and encouraging natural surveillance through strategic placement of doors, windows, and lighting. (Safe Design)
503.2. Site the primary entry in a location that logically relates to the building use and clearly connects all major points of access. (Safe Design) SD33. Locate main building entryways away from high-traf?c vehicular areas. Encourage visible access to main building entryways that is obvious, identi?able, and distinctive. (Safe Design)
SD4. Provide appropriate pedestrian connections to on—sitebuildings.

SD4.1. Main pedestrian connections from adjacent streets to the public entrance of buildings of the site should be a minimum of six (6) feet in width. (Pedestrian Access) SD4.Z. Connect on—sitepedestrian walkways with existing private infrastructure to support linkages outside of the project. (Pedestrian Access)
SD5. Locate parking and loading areas in locations that reduce impacts.

SD5.1. Encourage loading areas to be located in enclosed spaces to reduce visual clutter and potential impacts to the surrounding area. (Parking & Loading) SD5.2. Locate parking away from public areas to reduce visual impacts. (Parking & Loading) SD53. When parking must be located adjacent to public areas, incorporate architectural and landscape screening of parking areas. (Parking & Loading) SD5.4. Covered parking and/orloading areas are encouraged. Where covered parking and/ or loading areas are provided, ensure shading elements are linked with the overall design of the project. Shading elements should generally not be located between the main building and street frontages. (Parking & Loading)

Page 154 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 540 of 1671

INTEGRATEMEANINGFUL OPEN SPACE
SD6. Provide meaningful open space areas.
506.1. Open spaces areas should be sited to enhance on-site pedestrian activities as well as provide a landscape setting for on-site buildings. (Open Space) SD6.2. Contribute to the character and proportion of surrounding open space by siting open spaces that create continuity with existing open space areas on adjacent properties. (Open Space)
SD63. A smaller number of larger sized open spaces is preferred to a larger quantity of smaller sized open spaces. (Open Space)
SD6.4. Utilizeopen space as buffers to nearby sensitive uses, such as residential areas, where appropriate. (Open Space)
Encourage loading areas in enclosed spaces Provide meaningful open space Photo by: Doris McCIay Rendering created by: EAPCArchitects Engineers

MINIMIZEIMPACTS OF BUILDING EQUIPMENT& SERVICEAREAS
SD7. Minimize the visual and physical impacts ofutility equipment, refuselocations, and building service areas.

SD7.1. Locate building service areas so as to minimize visibilityfrom public View and reduce potential con?icts with on-site circulation. (Minimize Service Areas) SD7.Z. Concealment of utility equipment, refuse locations, and building service areas should complement the overall architectural design. (Minimize Service Areas) SD8. Consider the placement ofutilities in the overall design ofthe site.

SD8.1. Consult with utility providers to manage the location of new above—grade facilities (i.e. switching cabinets, transformers, pedestals, back?ow preventers, and other utility boxes) to reduce safety issues and maintain visual quality of the development. (Utilities)
SD8.2. To ensure the long-term viability of utility screening, coordinate screening with the applicable utility provider to ensure utility equipment is accessible for maintenance and service per the requirements of the utility provider. (Utilities)

Page 155 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 541 of 1671 height ings
mun/?nm‘muwmmu:Irv-v4WIMAJN!",mm_nm;.uwm_wmuv Mm"
a»):uj?lllyévusmxmmuwurawJr/lkuwmnWWM‘W

BUILDINGDESIGN(

COMPLEMENT EXISTINGDEVELOPMENT
BD1. Design buildings to complement the existing development context.

BD1.1. Provide compatible transition in building scale, height and mass. (Context Compatibility)
BD1.2. New buildings should coordinate building form and height with the surrounding context. (Context Compatibility)
BD1.3. Integrate materials, textures, and colors as found in the context of the surrounding area. (Architectural Context)
BD1.4. The permanent use of prefabricated metal buildings is generally discouraged. (Architectural Context)
BD2. Incorporate the unique featuresofScottsdale into the building design.

BDZ.1. Emphasize building attributes that give Scottsdale, the neighborhood surrounding the site, and/orthe site itself a distinctive sense of place. (Unique Features) BD2.2. Create compatibility between new projects and existing architectural context, including historic and modern designs, through building articulation, scale and proportion, roof forms, detailing, fenestration, and/orthe use of complementary materials. (Complimentary Features)
BD2.3. Buildings should be designed to express quality architectural design, design details, articulation, and quality materials on allsides of the building, including those portions of the building that may be less visible from off—site.(Four-Sided Architecture)
BD2.4. Incorporate Scottsdale’sSensitive Design Principles into the building design. (Sensitive Design)
Coordinate building form and with surround Four—sidedarchitecture Rendering created by: RKAAArchitects, Inc
SIumuesl_941ll_06_ldp4qh)pg'

Page 156 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 542 of 1671

REDUCEAPPARENTBUILDINGSIZE& MASS
BD3. Reduce the visual mass and height ofbuildings.

BD3.1. Locate large portions of the building underground to reduce visual mass on the site. (Visual Mass)
BD3.2. Vary the height of the building and incorporate secondary architectural elements/ BD3.3.
masses and material articulation to increase the visual interest of the building. (Visual Mass)
Promote the use of architectural features, elements, and details that are of a human scale into the building facade, entries and lobby areas in a manner that is consistent with the overall architectural design. (Human Scale)
BD3.4. The exterior design of a building should reveal, where possible, differences in its BD3.5.

BD3.6.
internalfunctions as expressions of height, massing, and the composition of the elevations. (Human Scale)
Avoidlong or continuous blank wall planes and monotonous wall treatments and subdivide large vertical or horizontal building planes (facades) into varying masses. (Blank Walls)
Incorporate projections, recesses, or other architectural variation into wall planes to provide strong shadows and visual interest and help the eye divide the building into smaller parts. (Blank Walls)
BD4. Integrate transparency into the building design.

BD4.1.

BD4.2.

Incorporate building penetrations through window and door openings that break up wall planes and provide a visual connection to the interior of the building. (Building Transparency)
Buildings facades that face roadways or the public realm should avoid blank walls devoid of building penetrations. (Building Transparency) Vary height of building and incorporate secondary elements Integrate transparency into the building design Photo by: Goerge Bell "l1ttps://staric wixsraric com/media/Bdlal_l2ac503d3f21420db23d30c3a3c539c1jpg"

Page 157 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 543 of 1671

SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES DESIGN GUIDELINE
S

DISCOURAGETHE USE OF CORPORATE IDENTIFICATIONIN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE BD5. Discourage the application ofcorporate colors to building ?nishes.

BD5.1. Avoid the use of bold corporate colors as the primary paint application of a building. (Corporate Colors)
BD5.2. Integrate corporate colors, or variation of corporate colors, as minor accent features, not as overall color themes, but avoid the use of color banding or stripes. (Corporate Colors)
BD6. Discourage the use offenestrationor glazing for marketing ofbuilding or business.

BD6.1. Avoid the use of false windows that do not provide actual penetrations to the interior of the building. (True Windows)
BD6.2. Interior storage units should not be visible through a building storefront or windows.

Interior hallways or other non—storage unit areas of the interior that are visible through a building storefront or window should be painted muted tones that complement exterior building colors. The use of bright colors, or colors derived from corporate identi?cation are highly discouraged. (Corporate Identi?cation) Avoid bold corporate colors as primary paint application Reduce visibility of interior storage units through windows “htlps://ca1d1292:693289799024e283ISGfd84002061dd018c7b04c794 ssl cll rackcdn. "httus:l/caldlaBlcSBaZSQNSUZ-‘Ie283I56ld84008061dd01867b04c79d.ss| cfZ vackcdn Com/600761504204jpg” CDrF/EDOVISOSZSS jpg '

INTEGRATEAPPROPRIATE CLIMATICRESPONSES INTO THE BUILDINGDESIGN BD7. Encourage use ofarchitectural featuresto protect users fromenvironmental elements.

BD7.1. Provide overhead weather protection at building entryways. (Weather Protection) BD7.2. Integrate shading devices into the building design. (Shade) BD8. Ensure building designs account forthe unique climate ofthe desert Southwest.

BD8.1. Utilizewindows at lobby areas and interior corridors of the building to bring natural light to the interior of the site buildings. (Daylighting) BD8.2. Building designs should limit eastern and western exposures where feasible. (Climate) BD8.3. Windows on the eastern, southern, and western sides of a building should integrate shading devices to reduce the impacts of the sun on the interior of the building. (Climate)

Page 158 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 544 of 1671

PROVIDE CONTEXT-APPROPRIATEMATERIALS,COLORS& TEXTURES
309. Use building materials, colors and textures that connect the buildings into the surrounding B010.
3011.
composition.
309.1. Materials with muted desert earth tones and course textures that are associated with the desert Southwest are encouraged. (Muted Earth Tones) 309.2. Incorporate colors and materials that emphasize shadow patterns. (Shadowing) 309.3. Materials and colors that have a light re?ective value (LRV)exceeding 70% are discouraged.(Low LRV)
309.4. The use of highly re?ective, polished or glossy materials should be limited and may be inappropriate in some contexts. (Limit Re?ectivity)
Incorporate building materials that provide long-lasting appeal to the building design. 3010.1. Building materials and ?nishes for eastern and western—facing facades should be designed to endure the temperature and sun exposure of the desert environment. (Durability)
3010.2. Encourage durable and attractive materials that will age well in Scottsdale’s climate, taking special care to detail corners, edges, and transitions in materials. (Durability) 3010.3. Building materials that have texture, pattern, or lend themselves to a high quality of detailing are encouraged. (Texture and Detailing)
3010.4. Pre-cast and site—castconcrete structures should incorporate suf?cient architectural detail in the form of applied ?nishes, integral textures, patterns, colors, threedimensional recesses and projections. (Texture and Detailing) Emphasize the true expression ofbuilding materials.
3011.1. Exterior ?nish materials such as concrete, brick, and tile are encouraged to be left in their natural color or colored integrally, as opposed to being painted, stained or coated. (Natural Finishes)
3011.2. Natural materials are preferred over simulated materials. (Natural Materials) 3011.3.Ver‘tically-stacked materials should be ordered by perceived material weight, with the “heaviest” materials at the bottom, and the ”lightest” materials towards the top. (Material Order)
Utilizemuted earth tones and materials with texture
"https://dbrp9vhnyulbv cloudfrant net/media/whitelabel/227/337015 facility/Fxterior‘AZUHDRS Jpg“
Emphasize true expression of building materials
"htTns:/, www.li‘estorage cum/assets/img/smrephotos/life-sturage-444- lifacility-GS 1820204ned , u

Page 159 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 545 of 1671

SELF- W, STORAGE FACILITIES ,,,,DESIGN, GUIDELINES

ENSUREMECHANICALSYSTEMSAND SCREENINGAREAPPROPRIATELYINTEGRATED BDlZ. Minimize the visibility ofmechanical systems.

BD12.1. Locate roof-mounted mechanical equipment behind rooftop parapets that are integrated with the overall architectural design of the building. Reduce the footprint of mechanical equipment areas where possible. (Mechanical Screening) BD12.2.Place ground-mounted mechanical equipment in enclosed equipment yards that are surrounded by walls, or other screening materials that are integrated with the overall architectural design. (Mechanical Screening)
BD12.3.Mechanical equipment for the operation of doors or windows, including bulkheads over roll-up doors, shall be located inside of the building. The face of roll—updoors shall be recessed into the building wallwhere practicable, and in no case shall extend beyond the facadeof the building.

BD12.4 Integrate roof drainage systems internal to the building shell. (Roof Drainage) BD12.5. Coordinate potential wireless communication facilities (WCF)locations into the overall building design as opposed to seeking freestanding locations at a later time. (Integrate WCF)
Locate roof-mounted equipment behind parapets incorporate architectural variation into wall planes "htl.ps://
ca1d1:92:69323979SDI-4e283i56ld8400806ldd?lsc7b04c794.55|.cf2.rackcdn .
"https://www.spareloot.com/se|f-storage/news/wp-conlent/uploads/sites/4/1017/‘(l7/ com/600x450—Badljpg" DSE_2036-e150109571857l3.jpg” Bring natural light into lobby and building corridors Avoid blank walls and monotonous wall treatments "hnps://usse|fstorage.com/systernistorage/facilily_images/3156487_large_opEn-uri20181127- "https:i/ca1d1392c69a28979902— 4elBBfSGfdMDEIEOSldleBc7b04c794.ssl.i:f2.ial:ki:dn. 6085-1chl15hx.jpg” cum/600x450-B7311pg"

Page 160 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 546 of 1671 ()

MINIMIZEIMPACTS OF BUILDING& SITE LIGHTING
LT1. Minimize the impacts ofbuilding and site lighting on sensitive uses.

LT1.1. Minimize, or eliminate where possible, the use exterior lighting in areas of the site located adjacent to residential or other sensitive uses. (Sensitive Uses) LT1.2. Limited lighting of landscape features and plant material are acceptable when associated with pedestrian spaces and building/site entrances. Landscape lighting in ESLareas should be kept to a minimum to allow the use of natural areas by wildlife that may otherwise be affected by nighttime illumination. Where landscape lighting does occur, lighting should be of low voltage type. (Sensitive Uses) LT1.3. Employ lighting control systems to reduce on—sitelighting during non-peak times. (Adaptable Lighting)
LT2. Discourage the use oflighting as a means ofbuilding identification.

LT2.1.The use of lighting in clear-story building elements is discouraged. (Limit Lighting) LT2.Z.Avoidthe use of colored lights that mimic corporate identi?cation. (Corporate Identi?cation)
LT2.3.The use of accent or up-lighting on the exterior of the building is discouraged. (Limit Lighting)

LIMITTHEUSEOF LIGHTINGATWINDOW OPENINGS
LT3. Discourage nighttime lighting that emphasizes a building’s internal function.

LT3.1. Limit lighting levels at window openings to reduce corporate identi?cation/indirect signage and avoid potential safety hazards for vehicles. (Window Lighting) LT3.2. Direct interior lighting to floor surfaces near window openings for safe use by building occupants and away from interior storage units. (Interior Lighting) Lightingfor building identi?cation is discouraged Limit Lighting levels at window openings "hnps://53-us-wesL—2amalonaws.com/gS-orion-clienLs/gS-c—ied:pw65-the-william-warren-group/ "Imps://www.washpruperty.com/design/propetries/carousel/commeiciaI/tlgS-cl-Saqulxofx-lhe-william-warren-group/uploads/phaenix7th.jpg” researcb-place/ijg“

Page 161 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 547 of 1671

SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES DESIGN GUIDELINE
S

ENHANCETHEVISUALPROCESSOF USERS
LT4. Discourage lighting that provides unwanted glare to site users.

LT4.1. Locate lighting at a pedestrian level to promote safe usage of the facility while reducing unwanted lighting glare. (Reduce Glare)
LT4.2. Color temperatures of exterior lighting ?xtures should match the color temperatures of adjacent properties, where appropriate, and be limited to a maximum of 3500K. (Visual Process)
LT4.3. Exterior lighting should have uniform spacing and avoid competing light levels to maintain lighting balance and enhance user vision. (Visual Process) LT4.4. Utilizefull cut-off lighting ?xtures and LEDlighting sources to more-precisely control lighting to assist users and reduce lighting glare. (Visual Process) LT5.Ensure adequate lighting is provided forsecurity ofthe site without creating lighting glare.

LT5.1. Ensure lighting is provided at building entrances and exits, loading areas, and pedestrian walkways to serve building needs while avoiding off-site glare, trespass/ spillage, and light pollution. (Appropriate Lighting)
LT5.2. Recommended light level guidelines and uniformity ratios established by the Illumination Engineering Society of North America (IESNA)in the IESNAlighting requirements should be used along with the predominant lighting characteristics of the surrounding area when determining appropriate solutions to lighting design. (Appropriate Lighting)
Provide adequate lighting for security while reducing glare Utilize LEDlighting with a warm color temperature "hnps://bloximages chicago? vip townr‘ews.com/championnewspapers.com/content/tncms/assets/ “httns:f/wwwmagellanarchirects com/wp»cuntent/un|oads/2018/05/smrquest_94rh_02 jug "
le8-b9e7-el3020063cca/5c0af2579b472 imagejpg"

Page 162 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 548 of 1671

INTEGRATELANDSCAPINGWITHTHEOVERALLDESIGNCONCEPT
L51. Provide intentional and purposeful planting arrangements that compliment and relate to the building architecture.

L51.1. Utilizelandscaping to strengthen architectural features of the building and provide a visual setting for the overall architectural design. (Purposeful Landscaping) L51.2. Integrate landscaping into the building setting and avoid landscaping that is separated by drive-aisles or other hardscape. (Landscaping Continuity) L51.3. Use a combination of hardscape and plantings to shape outdoor spaces. (De?ned Outdoor Spaces)
LSZ.Integrate landscape designs that celebrate Scottsdale’s unique location.

LSZ.1. Incorporate native and other drought—tolerant species into the landscape design for the site. (Native Plants)
LSZ.Z.In areas with strong natural desert character, maintain the visual continuity of the landscape by limiting the use of non-native planting to internalized areas not easily visible from the public right-of—wayor from adjoining sites. (Native Plants) L53. Reinforceexisting landscape concepts.

L53.1. Where a strong landscape concept exists in the surrounding area, such as an established streetscape, incorporate elements of the existing concept into the landscape design. (Contextual Elements)
LS3.2. Incorporate contextually appropriate landscape species into the landscape design and consider the mature size, scale, and shape of plants in the landscape design. (Context Appropriate Landscaping)

SCREENOFFENDINGVIEWSAND BUFFERSENSITIVELANDUSES
LS4.Screen o?‘ending views or non-public portions ofthe buildings and site with landscaping.

LS4.1. Utilize landscaping to minimize the presence of non—publicportions of the site, such as service areas. (Screening)
LS4.2. Provide landscaping buffers, where appropriate, to visually mitigate the facility from sensitive land uses, such as residential land uses. (Landscape Buffers)

ESTABLISHA HUMAN SCALEIN PEDESTRIANAREAS
L55. Provide landscape design that promotes interaction with the site.

LS5.1. Utilize plant material and placement that strengthens the user’s connection to the unique desert environment. (Promote Interaction)
LSS.2. Encourage the use of plant material and landscape design that shelters users from temperature extremes. (Shelter)
L553. Avoid the use of thorny plants near pedestrian walkways or other public areas. (Safety)

Page 163 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 549 of 1671

OF TERM
Corporate colors are a color scheme that an organization or business adopts as a key visual element of its corporate identity.

Fenestration is the design, construction, or presence of openings such as windows and doors in a building.

Human scale is design that recognizes how humans interact with their built environment based on their physical dimensions, capabilities, senses and limits. Buildings scaled to human physical capabilities have steps, ramps, doorways, railings, work surfaces, seating, shelves, ?xtures, walking distances, and other features that ?t well to the average person. Further, human scale in architecture can describe buildings with sightlines, acoustic properties, task lighting, ambient lighting, and spatial grammar that ?t well with human senses.

Light Re?ective Value (LRV)is a measure of visibleand usable light that is re?ected from a surface when illuminated by a light source.

Loading areas are permanently maintained spaces of a development project that users park within and load or unload items to be transferred to or from the facility.

Mechanical equipment is any electrical, heating, cooling, ventilation, or similar equipment or appurtenance serving a structure.

Open space is meaningful outdoor space for passive or active use. It includes, but is not limited to, settings for development, landscaping, hardscaping, seating areas, and sidewalks. Open space does not include parking areas or parking lot landscaping.

Pedestrian is any person afoot; or any person who uses a manual or motorized wheelchair.

Sensitive Design Principles is the document, and any amendments, adopted by the City Council Service areas are speci?c spaces of a development project where activities occur to service the buildings and/oroperations of the site, including, but not limited to, areas for refuse collection.

Shading device(s) is/arean integrated component of a window or facadethat protect a space from direct sun, overheating, and glare.

Sonoran Desert isthe unique desert climate in which Scottsdale resides U?lityfacilities/equipment are those facilities and equipment needed to serve a development project including, but not limited to, switching cabinets, transformers, pedestals, back?ow preventers, and other utility boxes.

Page 164 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 550 of 1671 ERY
aimamADDITIONALIMAG
Avoid long, blank walls and false windows Avoid bold colors; interior doors should be muted colors Pliolo by: Goerge Bell "https://53-mediaO.? yelpcdn.coWbpholo/ lwwOSfbVwSOSLijZZCKsA/Hpg
'
Clearstory lighting and building up—lightingare discouraged Discourage false windows and lighting of interior lockers ‘https://media supei pages cam/inedia/phoms/Z1,5'39/01/A2/38/images/2 [390142381200 jpg" Rendering created by: EAPCArchitects Engineers Vary the facade of the building and provide transparency Set back interior lockers from building windows "hlipx:l/easli‘aslvvilleselisluragecnm/wpcur‘lent/uploads/ZDIB/l?/ENSS-ClimaIE Blue- 3 “https://be’rcninc com 'wp~content/upleads/2018/04/untitled72‘l ibg" Edited by: er

Page 165 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 551 of 1671

SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES DESIGN GUIDELINE
S

INTENTIONALLYLEFTBLANK

Page 166 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 552 of 1671 ATTACHMENT 8

Page 167 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 553 of 1671 ucoammm .30...
02 mm;
mm>>m2<
0 HO

Page 168 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 554 of 1671 uconmmm .30...
02 $>
5255
NO

Page 169 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 555 of 1671 onmmmREF
oz
mm>
mm>>mz<
o

Page 170 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 556 of 1671 uconmmm EH2.

RE 253m
2 9: :25
: 23:85
mw3m2<
: <0

Page 171 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 557 of 1671 ma
NH
.2”
OH

Page 172 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 558 of 1671 E”
E”

Page 173 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 559 of 1671

IINIDJIID

MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 18, 2024
TO: Planning Commission
FROM Kevin Snyder, AICP, Community Development Director 44% SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: Regulations for Self-Storage/MiniStorage/Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities in the City of lndio Background Information:

On April 10, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed potential policy alternatives for the regulation of self-storage/mini-storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City of lndio As discussed in the staff issued memo for this meeting, the current moratorium on the land use entitlement approvals and building permit and engineering approvals for these specific land uses is in effect until July 1, 2024. At the conclusion of its discussion, the Commission gave consensus to the following regulatory alternative:

Policy Alternative #4 (Limitation on Total Number within City) + Policy Alternative #6 (Location Limitations for Facilities) + Policy Alternative #2 (Enhanced Design Standards) Following this consensus direction, staff noted that itwould further develop this regulatory approach for Commission review and discussion at its April 24, 2024 meeting. The following is a summary of staff’s analysis and/or recommendations for the Commission to provide consensus feedback on.

As a reminder, the Planning Commission is currently scheduled, per the approved Revised Work Plan approved by the City Council, to conduct the required public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council in May 2024.

Page 174 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 560 of 1671 II—I'III' --I.-I. I'l- I.'-.

IrI-II'II'IIrIqJ-l-‘Il-lrrrl-Ir-?r .
' mm.- ?‘J?-?i?: m;hr-I—?m
m m r¥=zr
‘ ,; ???'?? ''''
F' -
Policy Alternative #4:

As previously noted at the April 10 Commission meeting, there are 13 existing and active facilities in the City together with 7 that have received land use entitlement approval and are either going through the building permit and engineering approval processes and/or are under construction. Based on the reasonable assumption that these seven facilities will all be constructed, the City would have a total of 20 storage related facilities in the City. To help ensure that Policy Alternative #4 is based on a measurable standard — this was discussed by staff at the April 10 meeting — staff reviewed several different alternatives to legislatively establish a maximum number of allowed self-storage/mini— storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities within the City. Based on the Commission’s discussion at the April 10 meeting, staff understood that the Commission is seeking to recommend a total number of facilities within the City between 20 and 30.

Based on the following, staff identified the following options for this alternative:

1. Staff analyzed a square footage range based on population similar to how the City calculated the number of allowable cannabis facilities, however, with anticipated population growth, the applicability of a range proved to be limited because the difference between the high and low square footage amounts was de minimus.

2. Staff also analyzed the storage industry’s approach comprised of a competitive market area analysis. For this type of market-oriented analysis, a prospective storage operator would analyze a certain square footage (e.g. 5 to 10 square feet per person) within the area being analyzed less the existing square footage of facilities within that area. In addition, this type of analysis looks at other factors including but not limited to household income, household age, potential rental rates. The challenge with this market-based approach is that is intended to guide private sector decision-making and risk analysis for making an investment decision for a for-profit enterprise. This approach does not appear to be immediately applicable to citwide land use regulations because the primary goal of these regulations is to preserve and/or enhance the public health, safety and welfare of property owners, residents and businesses.

3. Staff analyzed a per capita alternative based on the current number of 20 facilities comprised of 13 existing facilities together with 7 under development facilities that staff reasonably believe will be constructed. Based on the City’s current population of 91,980 divided by 20 facilities, the per capita alternative could be 1 facility per 4,599 persons. Per the adopted General Plan 2040, the City’s planned build-out population is 121,000 persons meaning that there are approximately 29,020 more people that wil l reside in the City before the planned built-out status of the City. Therefore, the total number of additional facilities that could be developed in the City before the planned build-out situation would be 6 facilities (29,020 / 4,599 = 6.3).

Staff recommend that the Commission consider the third option presented for this alternative. This option is related to a commonly accepted measurement - i.e. 1 land use per X persons. It relates to the City’s planned population growth as specified in the City Council adopted General Plan 2040. Further, it is tied to the City’s future population

Page 175 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 561 of 1671 L‘J?J-F'—m_?f‘u
III-HI;-
?nq—I-u-I-mI-J *f'l-l'h
I-I.'I Eur-?- -...'1-=t-
?g: “H 3.; ....__.
_
.I
I -r.-a-H PI-I'II'I'f-I-? -w;1u-??l ::':3
mm-
"m.

Ill-I'll-l-Ill-II-I-Ilru
- ll
"-‘-
:J'I-I'Iu'I-I F'I-I-l-L?-
1“... Pk l-H-l-I'I-l'.

I_ FIJI-II“
" {Em "'.:-'."-|.-"—"+..-:|" i?'?!
I H-h -rh I" II b hamm
r:
am” =:'-..E§:"§ Wmmhmu. —-.
mmh1hm=??l? 11-"..-
IHIII-rr-I'I-I'IH-J. r..-
1:-'-'-l"-I-"IIul'-'
I.“— w?- Th?-u-I-Jlr-u-Il JHI-I-I?e-ha WW":—ul'l; u.—
d l-J'I-II-I--.'r|I r.-
Lnr-IFF—luI-I .|.I
3$.1.“:L?mi?‘?i7- qua-:-
growth that allows a reasonable number of additional facilities to support the City’s future population growth.

At this time, staff has not taken a position on what the regulatory position of the City should be when the maximum number of facilities is achieved, and a facility stops operating. Specifically, if the City has reached a maximum number of facilities and a facility closes reducing the remaining number of facilities below this maximum number, should the City allow one new additional facility to be developed either at the same property or somewhere else in the City or should the City not allow a new facility. For the latter, this could result in an overall reduction of total facilities in the City over a period of time. Staff recommend that the Commission discuss this item further on April 24 and provide consensus guidance.

Policy Alternative #6:

There are several location limitation options for the Commission to consider ranging from physical distance separation between facilities to locations in proximity to residentially zoned or used properties to limitations on proximity major street corridors. Similar to Policy Alternative #4, it is prudent to have a measurable standard (s) for the implementation of this policy alternative. Based on this premise, staff identified the following options for this alternative:

1. Physical geographic distance of 2,640 lineal feet (one-half a mile) between existing and new facilities and between new facilities as measured from property line to property line. T

2. Physical distance separation of 1,000 feet from streets having a functional classification or greater of Collector as measured from property line to the outer street right-of—wayline.

3. Physical geographic distance of 2,640 lineal feet (one-half a mile) between existing and new facilities and between new facilities as measured from property line to property line + Physical distance separation of 1,000 feet from streets having a functional classification or greater of Collector as measured from property line to the outer street right-of—wayline.

Staff recommend the third option for the implementation of this Policy Alternative should be considered by the Commission. This combined alternative will limitthe clustering of storage facilities within a certain area of the City that could reduce the amount of available industrial land and support the enhanced variety of diverse industrial land uses. This combined alternative will also reduce the potential for development of these facilities at or near major street sections in the City for which employment generating land uses might need or desire proximity and access for movement of goods, people and services. The Commission could at its discretion modify the recommended physical distance measurements based on its own discussion or feedback from interested parties.

At this time, staff has not taken a position on the question raised by the Commission on the “equitable distribution” of facilities throughout the City and whether this distribution

Page 176 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 562 of 1671 r--.h I
'1‘ ill-l?!=_'-:-r-'l lit-II nup'hrn—l- -|'-
aqua—lulhIw-m-lh?‘inn-1...!- uh: ??-mi *'I-- fit;
min-11' “*h?l-m Ind-I.-? 2.311;?"Ediil7?r?‘?
should focus on the siting of allowed facilities within North lndio closer to the current growth areas of the City. Staff recommend that the Commission discuss this item further on April 24 and provide consensus guidance.

Policy Alternative #2:

Section 2.04 (Non-Residential Zones) of the City of lndio Unified Development Code regulates land uses and development standards for Light Industrial (IL) and Heavy Industrial (IH) zoned properties. In addition, Section 4.19 (Mini-Storage Warehousing or Facility) of the City of lndio Unified Development Code specifies additional development standards that must be complied with for mini-storage warehousing facilities. After reviewing potential options for enhanced design standards, staff recommends that the Commission consider the adoption of Design Guidelines similar to those utilized by the City of Scottsdale, Arizona. The adoption of these Design Guidelines together with the more broad-based zoning requirements specified in Section 2.04 of the Unified Development Code as well as the continued implementation of specific subsections of Section 4.19 of the Unified Development Code — eg. a minimum of 50 percent of the lot frontage being occupied by retail or office uses — will result in higher quality design architectural and site design of these facilities that will be more context sensitive to surrounding land uses.

Page 177 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 563 of 1671 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 178 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 564 of 1671

4.19. MINI-STORAGE WAREHOUSING

OR FACILITY
. P I I

CITY OF INDIO IUNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
ARTICLE 4 254
The purpose of this Chapter is to establish standards to enhance the compatibility of mini—storage warehousing or facilities, including affiliated recreational vehicle (RV)storage, with other commercial and industrial uses in the same zone and to minimize the impact of these uses on nearby properties. The development standards of this Chapter shall apply to all mini—storage warehousing or facilities in the city. 419 O1 urpose and App icabi ity
No more than one manager’s security residence shall be permitted.

Allstorage shall be within an enclosed building except for the storage of RVs, which shall be completely screened from View from surrounding properties and abutting streets.

A minimum 50 percent of the lot frontage of mini-storage warehousing or facility developments must be occupied by general retail or of?ce uses on the ground floor (per Article 2 (Zone Regulations”.

These ground ?oor activities shall not be directly associated with the mini—storage warehousing or facility established at the site. Allmini-storage buildings and RV storage shall be located behind the fronting general retail or of?ce uses. Exception. The Director is authorized to exercise discretion in the application of this standard where it is determined that the location does not offer the market conditions to support implementation of the minimum retail/of?cefrontage requirement, as substantiated through provision of a market analysis conducted by a quali?ed real estate professional.

The following activities are prohibited on or from the premises of a mini—storage warehouse or facility:

The conduct of a business (other than the mini—storage business itself, required fronting retail or of?ce uses, and permitted accessory uses);
The retail sale of stored items;
The commercial repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers and other like vehicles; The operation of spray-painting equipment, power tools, welding equipment, or other similar equipment; and
The production, fabrication, or assembly of products.

The rental of single unit trucks and small utility trailers shall be permitted as an accessory use to a ministorage warehouse or facility, provided the business is conducted out of the same of?ce as that of the ministorage warehouse orfacility. No trucks or trailers shall be displayed in public view, and the combined total of all trucks and trailers stored on site shall not exceed a ratio of two trucks or trailers for each 100 storage Truck and trailer storage shall be screened from streets and adjacent properties.

When adjacent to a residential use, the exterior wall of the mini—storage shall be constructed of decorative block and subject to the standards in Chapter 3.01.10 (Fences, Walls, and Screening).

Page 179 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 565 of 1671 ATTACHMENT 2

Page 180 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 566 of 1671

SCOTTSDALE
Self-Storage Facilities

DESIGN GUIDELINES

Page 181 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 567 of 1671 Virgina Korte — Chair, City Councilrepresentative
William Scarbrough — Vice Chair
Christian Serena — Planning Commission representative
Doug Craig — Member
Michal Ann Joyner— Member
Joe Young — Member
Shakir Gushgari — Member

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
Brad Carr, AICP, LEED—AP- Planning & Development Area Manager Adam Yaron — Project Coordination Liaison
Doris McClay — Senior Planner
Katie Posler — Planner
Chris Zimmer — Planning Specialist

PROJECTSTAFF

Page 182 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 568 of 1671 Self—StorageLand Use
Design Objectives
Purpose of Guidelines

INTRODUCTION
Ensure Continuity of Site Development (Surrounding Context) Provide Appropriate Access and Ef?cient On—SiteCirculation Integrate Meaningful Open Space
Minimize Impacts of Building Equipment & Service Areas

SITE DESIGN (SD)
Complement Existing Developmen
Reduce Apparent Building Size & Mass
Discourage the Use of Corporate Identi?cation in Building Architecture Integrate Appropriate Climatic Responses into?the Building Design Provide Context—Appropriate Materials, Colors & Textures Ensure Mechanical Systems and Screening are Appropriately Integrated

BUILDINGDESIGN (BD)
Minimize Impacts of Buildings & Site Lighting
Limit the Use of Lighting at Window Openings
Process of Users

LIGHTING(LT)
Integrate Landscaping with the Overall Design Concept
Screen Offending Views and Buffer Sensitive Land Uses
a Human Scale in Pedestrian Areas

LANDSCAPING(LS)
4 5566 70099
10 12
12 14
14 14

GLOSSARYOF TERMS
16

Page 183 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 569 of 1671

SELF-STORAGELAND USE
For the purpose of this document, the term “self-storage facility" includes establishments that offer storage in an enclosed building, with access to storage units only from the interior of the building. These facilities are referenced as "internalized community storage” in the city’s Zoning Ordinance and can also be referred to as miniwarehouses.

DESIGN 0 B] ECTIVES
For decades, the site planning and aesthetic design evaluation through the Development Review process has instrumentally shaped the community. Quality design is seamlessly woven into the surrounding context, both respecting and enhancing its surroundings. Another measure of quality design is its functionality and durability. A building should be constructed with both the present and the future in mind. Certain materials and construction methods should be used to create a building that will withstand the test of time. A design can be measured by what it contributes to the community. Quality design should not only meet individual needs but should also achieve the objectives of the greater city.

These Self—Storage Facilities Design Guidelines provide the framework that guides individual developments as they visually and physicallywork together to define, shape, and enhance the image of Scottsdale. A portion of the design objectives found in these guidelines have been retained from earlier, community—created design goals, while others include updated language or represent completely new concepts. Collectively, these design objectives establish the community’s aesthetic vision for self-storage facilities The design objectives for self-storage facilities include:

Cohesive/y integrate self-storage facilitiesinto the fabricofthe built environment. - Mitigate potential unwanted impacts fromself—storage facilitieson adjacent properties, especially adjacent residential properties.
- Limit the use ofcorporate identificationin the building design ofself—storage facilities. - Promote the use ofhigh—qualitydesign consistent with other buildings in Scottsdale. - Encourage property improvements to fosterthe overall economic prosperity ofScottsdale.

Page 184 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 570 of 1671 SD

ENSURECONTINUITYOF SITE DEVELOPMENT(SURROUNDINGCONTEXT) SD1. The site plan, building arrangement, and orientation ofuses should coordinate with neighboring properties and respect and enhance Scottsdale’sSonoran Desert environment.

SD1.1.

SD1.2.
$01.3.

Ensure site development is compatible and complements the existing development pattern of the neighborhood surrounding the site, including established building setbacks, landscape buffers, site access and placement of building functions. (Context Compatibility)
Respect adjacent properties with design and site planning to minimize disrupting the privacy and outdoor activities of residents in adjacent buildings. (Context Compatibility)
Incorporate Scottsdale’s Sensitive Design Principles into the site design. (Sonoran Desert)

PROVIDEAPPROPRIATEACCESSAND EFFICIENTON-SITECIRCULATION SDZ. Promote ef?cientvehicular access.

SD2.1.

SD22.

The consolidation of site entrances is encouraged, where appropriate. (Appropriate Access)
Choose locations for vehicular access and service access that avoids potential con— ?icts with pedestrian circulation. (Appropriate Access) (Safe Design) SD3. Ensure adequate safety and security ofthe site.

SD3.1.

SD3.2.

SD33.

Create a safe environment by providing lines of sight and encouraging natural surveillance through strategic placement of doors, windows, and lighting. (Safe Design)
Site the primary entry in a location that logically relates to the building use and clearly connects all major points of access. (Safe Design) Locate main building entryways away from high-traf?c vehicular areas. Encourage visible access to main building entryways that is obvious, identi?able, and distinctive. (Safe Design)
504. Provide appropriate pedestrian connections to on-site buildings.

SD4.1.
504.2.

Main pedestrian connections from adjacent streets to the public entrance of buildings of the site should be a minimum of six (6) feet in width. (Pedestrian Access) Connect on—sitepedestrian walkways with existing private infrastructure to support linkages outside of the project. (Pedestrian Access)
SD5. Locate parking and loading areas in locations that reduce impacts.

SD5.1.

SD5.2.
505.3.
505.4.

Encourage loading areas to be located in enclosed spaces to reduce visual clutter and potential impacts to the surrounding area. (Parking & Loading) Locate parking away from public areas to reduce visual impacts. (Parking & Loading) When parking must be located adjacent to public areas, incorporate architectural and landscape screening of parking areas. (Parking 8'.Loading) Covered parking and/0rloading areas are encouraged. Where covered parking and/ or loading areas are provided, ensure shading elements are linked with the overall design of the project. Shading elements should generally not be located between the main building and street frontages. (Parking & Loading)

Page 185 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 571 of 1671

INTEGRATEMEANINGFULOPEN SPACE
SDG. Provide meaningful open space areas.
$06.1. Open spaces areas should be sited to enhance on-site pedestrian activities as well as provide a landscape setting for on-site buildings. (Open Space) SD6.2. Contribute to the character and proportion of surrounding open space by siting open spaces that create continuity with existing open space areas on adjacent properties. (Open Space)
SD63. A smaller number of larger sized open spaces is preferred to a larger quantity of smaller sized open spaces. (Open Space)
SD6.4. Utilize open space as buffers to nearby sensitive uses, such as residential areas, where appropriate. (Open Space)
Encourage loading areas in enclosed spaces PFOVidEmeaningful open space Photo by: Doris McClay Rendering created by: EAPCArchitectsEngineers

MINIMIZEIMPACTS OF BUILDING EQUIPMENT& SERVICEAREAS
SD7. Minimize the visual and physical impacts ofutility equipment, refuselocations, and building serwce areas.

SD7.1. Locate building service areas so as to minimize visibility from public view and reduce potential con?icts with on—sitecirculation. (Minimize Service Areas) 5072. Concealment of utility equipment, refuse locations, and building service areas should complement the overall architectural design. (Minimize Service Areas) SD8. Consider the placement ofutilities in the overall design ofthe site.

SD8.1. Consult with utility providers to manage the location of new above—grade facilities (i.e. switching cabinets, transformers, pedestals, backflow preventers, and other utility boxes) to reduce safety issues and maintain visual quality of the development. (Utilities)
SD8.2. To ensure the long—termviability of utility screening, coordinate screening with the applicable utility provider to ensure utility equipment is accessible for maintenance and service per the requirements of the utility provider. (Utilities)

Page 186 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 572 of 1671 Cour te building form and height with surroundings
“my. m m. 1. mm. awwu‘os w ._.m,\um.w Luv-MM
‘rI-JM .m- . . mrwuru.\med-IW~1M.«:«um-IulmA-nl

DESIGN(

COMPLEMENTEXISTINGDEVELOPMENT
BD1. Design buildings to complement the existing development context.

BD2.1. Emphasize building attributes that give Scottsdale, the neighborhood surrounding the site, and/orthe site itself a distinctive sense of place. (Unique Features) BD2.2. Create compatibility between new projects and existing architectural context, including historic and modern designs, through building articulation, scale and proportion, roof forms, detailing, fenestration, and/orthe use of complementary materials. (Complimentary Features)
BDZ.3. Buildings should be designed to express quality architectural design, design details, articulation, and quality materials on allsides of the building, including those portions of the building that may be less visible from off-site. (Four-Sided Architecture)
BDZ.4. Incorporate Scottsdale‘sSensitive Design Principles into the building design. (Sensitive Design)
dina Four—sidedarchitecture
emu-id ,Lcenr
.w_55‘8l slamuest_94lll_0f1_l4p4qh4pg"
Rendering created by: RKAAArchllects, Inc

Page 187 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 573 of 1671

REDUCEAPPARENTBUILDINGSIZE& MASS
BD3. Reduce the visual mass and height of buildings.

BD3.1.

BD3.2.

BD3.3.
303.4.

BD3.5.

BD3.6.

Locate large portions of the building underground to reduce visual mass on the site. (Visual Mass)
Vary the height of the building and incorporate secondary architectural elements/ masses and material articulation to increase the visual interest of the building. (Visual Mass)
Promote the use of architectural features, elements, and details that are of a human scale into the building facade, entries and lobby areas in a manner that is consistent with the overall architectural design. (Human Scale)
The exterior design of a building should reveal, where possible, differences in_its internal functions as expressions of height, massing, and the composition of the elevations. (Human Scale)
Avoid long or continuous blank wall planes and monotonous wall treatments and subdivide large vertical or horizontal building planes (facades) into varying masses. (Blank Walls)
Incorporate projections, recesses, or other architectural variation into wall planes to provide strong shadows and visual interest and help the eye divide the building into smaller parts. (Blank Walls)
BD4. Integrate transparency into the building design.

BD4.1.

BD4.2.

Incorporate building penetrations through window and door openings that break up wall planes and provide a visual connection to the interior of the building. (Building Transparency)
Buildings facades that face roadways or the public realm should avoid blank walls devoid of building penetrations. (Building Transparency) Vary height of building and incorporate secondary elements Integrate transparency into the building design Photo by: Goerge Bell ”https://static wixstatic cam/media (3d la 1_ l2ac603d3i2 [420dbe3da0c333c539c Llpg”

Page 188 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 574 of 1671

SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES DESIGN GUIDELINE
S

DISCOURAGETHE USE OF CORPORATE IDENTIFICATIONIN BUILDINGARCHITECTURE B05. Discourage the application of corporate colors to buildingfinishes.

BD5.1. Avoid the use of bold corporate colors as the primary paint application of a building. (Corporate Colors)
305.2. Integrate corporate colors, or variation of corporate colors, as minor accent features, not as overall color themes, but avoid the use of color banding or stripes. (Corporate Colors)
806. Discourage the use offenestrationor glazing for marketing ofbuilding or business. 306.1. Avoid the use of false windows that do not provide actual penetrations to the interior of the building. (True Windows)
306.2. Interior storage units should not be visible through a building storefront or windows.

Interior hallways or other non—storage unit areas of the interior that are visible through a building storefront or window should be painted muted tones that complement exterior building colors. The use of bright colors, or colors derived from corporate identi?cation are highly discouraged. (Corporate Identi?cation) Avoid bold corporate colors as primary paint application Reduce visibility of interior storage units through windows ”ht'lpsillcaldlaQZc?Ba289799024!€283I56fd84008061dd018c7b04£794 SSICIZrackcdn “httosz’ ca1dlaB2c69328979502—42223f56ld84DDSOElddDISc7b04c794 ssl cfZ lackcdn corn/600x4504204jpg” com/600x4SD-8285jpg'

INTEGRATEAPPROPRIATECLIMATICRESPONSESINTO THE BUILDINGDESIGN BD7. Encourage use ofarchitectural featuresto protect users fromenvironmental elements.

BD7.1. Provide overhead weather protection at building entryways. (Weather Protection) 307.2. Integrate shading devices into the building design. (Shade) BD8. Ensure building designs accountforthe unique climate ofthe desert Southwest.

BD8.1. Utilizewindows at lobby areas and interior corridors of the building to bring natural light to the interior of the site buildings. (Daylighting) 308.2. Building designs should limit eastern and western exposures where feasible. (Climate )
808.3. Windows on the eastern, southern, and western sides of a building should integrate shading devices to reduce the impacts of the sun on the interior of the building. (Climate)

Page 189 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 575 of 1671

PROVIDE CONTEXT-APPROPRIATEMATERIALS,COLORS& TEXTURES
BD9.

BDlO.

BD11.

Use building materials, colors and textures that connect the buildings into the surrounding camposition.

BD9.1. Materials with muted desert earth tones and course textures that are associated with the desert Southwest are encouraged. (Muted Earth Tones) 309.2. Incorporate colors and materials that emphasize shadow patterns. (Shadowing) BD9.3. Materials and colors that have a light re?ective value (LRV)exceeding 70% are discouraged.(Low LRV)
809.4. The use of highly re?ective, polished or glossy materials should be limited and may be inappropriate in some contexts. (Limit Re?ectivity)
Incorporate building materials that provide long-lasting appeal to the building design.

BD10.1. Building materials and ?nishes for eastern and western-facing facades should be designed to endure the temperature and sun exposure of the desert environment. (Durability)
BD10.2. Encourage durable and attractive materials that will age well in Scottsdale’s climate, taking special care to detail corners, edges, and transitions in materials. (Durability) 8010.3. Building materials that have texture, pattern, or lend themselves to a high quality of detailing are encouraged. (Texture and Detailing)
3010.4. Pre-cast and site-cast concrete structures should incorporate suf?cient architectural detail in the form of applied ?nishes, integral textures, patterns, colors, three— dimensional recesses and projections. (Texture and Detailing) Emphasize the true expression ofbuilding materials.

BD11.1. Exterior ?nish materials such as concrete, brick, and tile are encouraged to be left in their natural color or colored integrally, as opposed to being painted, stained or coated. (Natural Finishes)
BD11.2. Natural materials are preferred over simulated materials. (Natural Materials) BD11.3.Vertica|ly-stacked materials should be ordered by perceived material weight, with the ”heaviest” materials at the bottom, and the “lightest” materials towards the top. (Material Order)
Utilize muted earth tones and materials with texture
"https //dbrp9vhovulbv.cluudfront net/media/whitelaiael/ZZ7/337016 facility/FxteriaMZOHDRS nag"
Emphasize true expression of building materials
"h?:ls:/ www li‘estarage tom/nssets/img/storephams/l‘fuvstorage?u- l-fazilitva?s 182010-med. ipg"

Page 190 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 576 of 1671

F-STORAGE FACILITIES DESIGN GUIDELINES
w um
mun/SN
SEL

ENSUREMECHANICALSYSTEMSAND SCREENINGAREAPPROPRIATELYINTEGRATED BD12. Minimize the visibility ofmechanicalsystems.

BD12.1. Locate roof—mountedmechanical equipment behind rooftop parapets that are integrated with the overall architectural design of the building. Reduce the footprint of mechanicalequipment areas where possible. (Mechanical Screening) BD12.2. Place ground-mounted mechanicalequipment in enclosed equipment yards that are surrounded by walls, or other screening materialsthat are integrated with the overall architectural design. (Mechanical Screening)
BD12.3. Mechanical equipment for the operation of doors or windows, including bulkheads over roll-up doors, shall be located inside of the building. The face of roll-up doors shall be recessed into the building wall where practicable, and in no case shall extend beyond the facadeof the building.

EISC2036-e1501095718570.jpg”
x450-8842Jpg"
Bring natural light into lobby and building corridors Avoid blank walls and monotonous wall treatments “httpsz/lusselfslorage com/system/sturage Ia:i|ily_images/3156487_large_opEn-uri20181127- "Imus ca1dia91c69328979902- SOSS-lchnth.jpg” 4e283l56fd84DDSOElddO18c7b04c794.ssl.cf2.vackcdn com/600x450-8751jpg" £75,!"
EMS
.

Page 191 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 577 of 1671

MINIMIZEIMPACTSOF BUILDING& SITELIGHTING
LT1. Minimize the impacts ofbuilding and site lighting on sensitive uses.

LT1.1. Minimize, or eliminate where possible, the use exterior lighting in areas of the site located adjacent to residential or other sensitive uses. (Sensitive Uses) LT1.2. Limited lighting of landscape features and plant material are acceptable when associated with pedestrian spaces and building/site entrances. Landscape lighting in ESLareas should be kept to a minimum to allow the use of natural areas by wildlife that may otherwise be affected by nighttime illumination. Where landscape lighting does occur, lighting should be of low voltage type. (Sensitive Uses) LT1.3. Employ lighting control systems to reduce on—sitelighting during non—peaktimes. (Adaptable Lighting)
LT2.Discourage the use oflighting as a means ofbuilding identi?cation.

LT2.1.The use of lighting in clear-story building elements is discouraged. (Limit Lighting) LT2.2.Avoidthe use of colored lights that mimic corporate identi?cation. (Corporate Identi?cation)
LT2.3.Theuse of accent or up-lighting on the exterior of the building is discouraged. (Limit Lighting)

LIMITTHE USE OF LIGHTINGAT WINDOW OPENINGS
LT3. Discourage nighttime lighting that emphasizes a building’s internal function.

LT3.1. Limit lighting levels at window openings to reduce corporate identi?cation/indirect signage and avoid potential safety hazards for vehicles. (Window Lighting) LT3.2. Direct interior lighting to ?oor surfaces near window openings for safe use by building occupants and away from interior storage units. (Interior Lighting) Lighting for building identi?cation is discouraged Limit Lighting levels at window openings "hups://53-us-west-2 amatunaws com/g5-orion-c|ienls/gs-c-iedcpw65-Lhe-wiIliam—warren—group/ "httpszilwwwmashpvupertv com/design/properties/tarouse|/commercial/4—researchplace/Z.jpg“ gS-cl-53zq4xofx-the-wiIliani-warren-group/uploads/pboeni?th jug"

Page 192 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 578 of 1671

SELF-STORAGEFACILITIES DESIGN GUIDELINES

ENHANCETHEVISUALPROCESSOF USERS
LT4. Discourage lighting that provides unwanted glare to site users.

LT4.1. Locate lighting at a pedestrian level to promote safe usage of the facility while reducing unwanted lighting glare. (Reduce Glare)
LT4.2. Color temperatures of exterior lighting ?xtures should match the color temperatures of adjacent properties, where appropriate, and be limited to a maximum of 3500K. (Visual Process)
LT4.3. Exterior lighting should have uniform spacing and avoid competing light levelsto maintain lighting balance and enhance user vision. (Visual Process) LT4.4. Utilizefull cut—offlighting ?xtures and LEDlighting sources to more-precisely control lighting to assist users and reduce lighting glare. (Visual Process) LT5.Ensure adequate lighting is providedforsecurity ofthe site without creating lighting glare.

LT5.1. Ensure lighting is provided at building entrances and exits, loading areas, and pedestrian walkways to serve building needs while avoiding off-site glare, trespass/ spillage, and light pollution. (Appropriate Lighting)
LT5.2. Recommended light level guidelines and uniformity ratios established by the Illumination Engineering Society of North America (IESNA)in the lESNA lighting requirements should be used along with the predominant lighting characteristics of the surrounding area when determining appropriate solutions to lighting design. (Appropriate Lighting)
Provide adequate lighting for security while reducing glare Utilize LEDlighting with a warm color temperature ”hnps //blnximages Chicago? vip townnews com/championinewspapers cum/conrenr/tncms/assets/ ""‘ttus: /www magellanarchixects com/wp-contem/un|cads/ZO13/05/srorquest454rh_02ipg" v3/edilorial/c/Sl/cBlOBcde-laE9-1les—eri-el3020063cca/5caaf25)9ba72 image ipg”

Page 193 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 579 of 1671 G L

INTEGRATELANDSCAPINGWITHTHEOVERALLDESIGNCONCEPT
L51. Provide intentional and purposeful planting arrangements that compliment and relate to the building architecture.

L51.1. Utilizelandscaping to strengthen architecturalfeatures of the building and provide a visual setting for the overall architectural design. (Purposeful Landscaping) L51.2. Integrate landscaping into the building setting and avoid landscaping that is separated by drive-aisles or other hardscape. (Landscaping Continuity) LS1.3. Use a combination of hardscape and plantings to shape outdoor spaces. (De?ned Outdoor Spaces)
L52. integrate landscape designs that celebrate Scottsdale’s unique location.

L52.1. incorporate native and other drought-tolerant species into the landscape design for the site. (Native Plants)
L52.2. In areas with strong natural desert character, maintain the visual continuity of the landscape by limiting the use of non—nativeplanting to internalizedareas not easily visible from the public right—of—wayor from adjoining sites. (Native Plants) L53.Reinforceexisting landscape concepts.

LS3.1. Where a strong landscape concept exists in the surrounding area, such as an established streetscape, incorporate elements of the existing concept into the landscape design. (Contextual Elements)
L53.2. Incorporate contextually appropriate landscape species into the landscape design and consider the mature size, scale, and shape of plants in the landscape design. (Context Appropriate Landscaping)

SCREENOFFENDINGVIEWS AND BUFFERSENSITIVELANDUSES
L54. Screen offending views or non-public portions ofthe buildings and site with landscaping.

LS4.1. Utilize landscaping to minimize the presence of non-public portions of the site, such as service areas. (Screening)
LS4.2. Provide landscaping buffers, where appropriate, to visually mitigate the facility from sensitive land uses, such as residentialland uses. (Landscape Buffers)

ESTABLISHA HUMAN SCALEIN PEDESTRIANAREAS
L55. Provide landscape design that promotes interaction with the site.

L55.1. Utilize plant material and placement that strengthens the user’s connection to the unique desert environment. (Promote Interaction)
L55.2. Encourage the use of plant material and landscape design that shelters users from temperature extremes. (Shelter)
L553. Avoid the use of thorny plants near pedestrian walkways or other public areas. (Safety)

Page 194 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 580 of 1671 abillties have steps, norw ilings
king distances, and tures t wel
rchitecture can des dings ightli
Open spuge eaning'ful outdoo ce for passive
settings for lopment, landsca hardscaping,
not include ing areas or parki t landscaping.

OF TERM
Corporate colors are a color scheme that an organization or business adopts as a key visual element of its corporate identity.

Fenestration is the design, construction, or presence of openings such as windows and doors in a building.

Human scale is design that recognizes how humans interact with their built environment based on their physical dimensions, capabilities, senses and limits. Buildings scaled to human physical cap ramps, d ays, ra , work surfaces, seating, shelves, ?xtures, wal other fea that ? l to the average person. Further, human scale in a cribe buil with s nes, acoustic properties, task lighting, ambient lighting, and spatial grammar that ?t well with human senses.

Light Re?ective Value (LRV)is a measure of visible and usable light that is re?ected from a surface when illuminated by a light source.

Loading areas are permanently maintained spaces of a development project that users park within and load or unload items to be transferred to or from the facility.

Mechanical equipment is any electrical, heating, cooling, ventilation, or similar equipment or appurtenance serving a structure.
is m r spa or active use. It includes, but is not limited to, deve ping, seating areas, and sidewalks. Open space does park ng lo
Pedestrian is any person afoot; or any person who uses a manual or motorized wheelchair.

Sensitive Design Principles is the document, and any amendments, adopted by the City Council.

Service areas are speci?c spaces of a development project where activities occur to service the buildings and/oroperations of the site, including, but not limited to, areas for refuse collection.

Shading device(s) is/arean integrated component of a window or facadethat protect a space from direct sun, overheating, and glare.

Sonoran Desert is the unique desert climate in which Scottsdale resides.

Utilityfacilities/equipment are those facilities and equipment needed to serve a development project including, but not limited to, switching cabinets, transformers, pedestals, back?ow preventers, and other utility boxes.

Page 195 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 581 of 1671

ADDITIONALIMA
s
l ‘r'l’l'lll
Avoid bold colors; interior doors should be muted colors Avoid long, blank walls and false windows "http5://53-Fnedia? ll yelpcdn a:m/bpholo/lww06l'bVwSOSLijzZCKsA/I )pg' Photo by: Goerge Bell Discourage false windows and lighting of interior lockers Rendering created by: EAPCArchitects Engineers
Clearstory lighting and building up—lightingare discouraged 'hrtpszllmedin supel pages conn/rnedia/phoms/Zl 39/01/42/38/images/2 [390142381200 ipg" Vary the facade of the building and provide transparency Set back interior lockers from building windows "Many/(easlliasl'villesel{storage cum/Wp-mr‘len{lupluads/l?‘lB/lW/E‘ISSrClimale Elueralmxdo?jpg” ‘https //he:cninc com wp-content/upleads/2018/OA/unntled-21iog" Edited by: Chris Zimrr‘er .1

Page 196 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 582 of 1671

SELF-STORAGEFACILITIESDESIGNGUIDELINES

PAGEINTENTIONALLY LEFTBLAN

Page 197 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 583 of 1671 ATTACHMENT 3

Page 198 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 584 of 1671 mun Sl
A
553
:33 5.2
mu
9:.

N
,.
5:2:
_.
2: Brows—.3on=5 =5
3: coonS: was25 nuou
: =_32.32.“ 2325
mm; nuE $5. "302 mama...
bmvczcmb5
A9wEuzum. wEEEE ®
cl 12>ELL<. AEEEE
15 ESE: ©
:5 952om?o?
”as
L 3;
¢>< 1L: ‘
‘Jm
Mu: _Awmmum?ucmu wxmu
omEBman9.52 53:52

Page 199 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 585 of 1671 ATTACHMENT 4

Page 200 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 586 of 1671 PE YTON REED Compan}
“o Ma?xer Research and rmn fnr ma RHIIr/inn lndllsrr’l
I.

II.

MARKET ANALYSIS

FOR A PROPOSED

SELF-STORAGEPROJECT
ON AN 8.25-ACRE SITE

IN INDIO
Preliminary Report, 1746
September23 2021

SUBJECT SITE AND PROPOSED PROJECT
Though the site is on a low traf?c volume street, it will bene?t from visitors to the adjacent StorQuestfacility, which has an establishedimage.

Doctor Carreon Blvd has direct links to Hwy 111on the west and east. Hwy 111 links to the l—lOFreeway via Golf Center Parkway just to the north of the site.

The current plan envisions 150.0008Fiof net rentable space, with two perimeter buildings and a large central building. The site will also accommodate RV storage.

COMPETITION
Given the location of the site relative to the I—10Freeway and other major roads, the competitive market area (CMA) is comprised of an oblong shape as shown in Exhibit A.

The Table 1 summary indicatesthat there are 11 facilities in the CMA that comprise 691,lOOSF of net rentable space. with an average size of 62,827SF per project.

The estimated overall space vacancy factor is an exceptionally low 0.8% indicating that most projects are essentially full.

None of these is new enough to assess an initial rent-up rate, but the near zero vacancy factor indicates a very strong market.

Table 2 illustrates the wide spectrum of rents for each size category and that most units are drive-ups. This table also provides average rent] SF numbers for each size and condition.

Premiums for drive-ups and climate-controlledunits cannot be calculated due to the very smallsample.Previous studies have identi?ed a premium of 15% for drive-up conditions. It is also true, however, that some users prefer ground ?oor conditions due to a perceptionthat they are cleaner.
540 Campus Drive, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660 , 949-733-9993, ggco?g‘ox net

Page 201 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 587 of 1671 PE YTUV REE/&) Cunt/
Preliminary Report 1746
September 23, 2021

Page 2 ends

7. 10.
ll.

16. 17.

18. 19.

In previous studies, I also identi?ed an average premium of 35%: for climatecontrolled space. Due to the lack of ground ?oor rents, the climate-controlled premium must be compared to drive-up conditions. Given a 15% premium for driveups, the net premium for climate-controlledspace compared to drive-ups is 20%.

The Table 3 graph illustrates the relative rent positioning for each project. Thisgraph shows that A Storage Place #6 and Prime Storage are at the high end of the rent spectrum, while StorAmerica #5 is at the low end.

This graph also provides an indication of the wide spreadfrom low to high rents for all size categories, with a range from 32% for le255 to 95% for 5x15’s and an average of 61%.

These radical swings in rents illustrate the fact that rents are typically set on a daily basis depending on the amount of space in inventory for any given size. In this case. the limited number of units available results in distorted rates. Thus, rents should be viewed as approximateindicatorsof potential. not absolutes. ' Also.mid—pointrents are more reliable indicators of achievable rents, since they tend to cancel the “outliers.”
. Average rents by space size shown in Table 4 indicate a decline of $0.l2/SF for each lOSF of size increase from the 5x10 to 10x10 and $0.03/SF from 10x10 to 10x15.

This relationship istypical for a suburban market and suggests robust demand for larger space types.
. The “space pro?le“ for the CMA shown in Table 5 indicates that the 5x10 & 10x10 sizes are predominantin terms of units, while the lelO’s and 10x20’s dominate in terms of space. These are normal relationshipsfor a suburban market. . Vacancy data by space size illustrates that the larger units experience a higher vacancy factor. This is atypical and is most likely skewed due to the very limited inventory of available units.
. The schematic absorption model presented in Table 6 shows that from 2001 through 2007 an average of48,000SF of new space per year was absorbed. After seven years of no new space, the market absorbed another 53,0008F during 2015 and 2016. It has now been another ?ve plus years without new space in the CMA.

The lack of new space, coupled with the exceptionally low vacancy factor, provide a strong indication of pent-up demand.

My investigation of projects currently planned for future developmentin the CMA revealed that there is one as shown in Table 7.

StorQuestwill develop a project of 50.0008F net rentable space on the north side of the I-10 Freeway at the northern fringe of the CMA.

Dependingon the actual development timing for StorQuest,it is likely that it would enter the market before the proposed project. This timing and the fringe location suggest that its competitive influence will be minimal. . Given the industry focus on self-storage and the low vacancy factor it is possible that another project could enter the market at some time during the initial rent-up period forthe proposedproject.
ls.)

Page 202 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 588 of 1671 PE YTO‘4'RE El ) Cum] (my
Preliminary Report 1746
September 23, 2021

Page 3 ends

III.

10. 11.

MARKET DEMAND
The demographic summary shown in Table 8 indicates a population base of 128,400, with a projected increase to 141,000 by 2026. This expresses a 2% growth rate compared to 1% for California. This higher rate is due to the ample vacant land in the CMA for future residential development. Thus.this area is where most of the future growth of the Coachella Valley will occur.

The percentage of owner households at 62% is well above the average of 56% for California. but the median income of $45,100 is substantially below $67,100 for the state. The large amount of second homes/homeowners signi?cantly skews this number to a higher amount.

The large percentage of households in the 35 to 54 group is positive, since this group is in the peak years of acquiring household.business and recreational goods.

Similarly. the 55+ group is highly positive since most are in a move-down mode; thus, in need of storage for items no longer in use.

The foregoing factors are favorable for self-storage demand and suggest a focus on larger sizes.

Table 9 indicates that most of the projects receive some market support from outside the CMA.

The per capita use factor at 3.74SF derived from Table 9 is well under the state at

5.53SF. This low per capita supports the conclusion relative to pent-up demand and a need for additional space in the CMA.

The long-term trend for per capita has averaged a 4%: annual increase. Recent readings have been lower. indicating that a 3% rate should be a more reasonable predictorof the future trend.

The combination of a growing population and increasing per capita use comprise the primary drivers for self-storage demand.

The Table 10 analysis uses these two factors to derive an estimate of demand for new self-storage space in the CMA. which is estimated at 25.200iSFper year for an average absorption of about 2.1008F per month from these sources.

In addition to the above, the current very low vacancy factor is a good indicator of potentialpent-up demand. In order to adjust to a normal 10% vacancy factor, an additional 63,0008F: of new space would be required to bring the market to a state of equilibrium and satisfy pent-up demand.

This should take place over a two-year periodand equates to an additional demand of about 2,6OOSFper month.
. Given the projected growth for the CMA. demandgenerated by new homes and apartments will also have a major positive in?uence to demand. This is due to the fact that new home buyers and apartment renters use storage at a much higher rate than existing home owners and renters.
. The Table 11 analysis indicates that this source should boost absorption by another

1.20031:per month.

Page 203 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 589 of 1671 Totals: 870 267 .137 $234,955
PE YTO’V'REED &Company
Preliminary Report 1746
September 23. 2021

Page 4 ends

14. 15.

16. 17.

IV.

Together, normal demand (table 10), demand from the vacancy adjustment and demand from new home construction (Table 11) total 5.90081:per month on average Due to the strong location and new product, and in light of the anticipated low level of future competition, the proposed project should capture 60% of this potential for a rent-up rate of 3.500:SFper month.

For the same reasons.it should capture a greater than fair share of the entry/exit market as shown Table 12. This analysis indicates that an additional 9OOSFof space would be absorbed per month by the proposed project, for an estimated total space absorption of 4,4OOSFper month.

At this rate, the 150,0008F project would reach 90% occupancy in about 31 months and 65% within 14+ months.

EVALUATION
The proposed project will bene?t from a convenient location and good access for the surrounding residential neighborhoods.

Pent-up demand in this market issubstantial and should add signi?cantly to the future demand for self—storage.

Also.most of the future growth in the Coachella Valley will be accommodated in and near the CMA. Thistrend will; augment demand for self-storage.

Notwithstanding the foregoing. the probable long absorption period suggests some consideration should be given to a phased development scheme.

In light of these ?ndings. I recommendyou proceed with the project as proposed.

Accordingly. I have outlined my recommendationsfor the space mix and rents as shown below.
gfcc du
Tvne Size qfcc du Tot Mix “A: SF gfcc du SISF SISF Total 5x5 25 60 60 5.3% 1,500 $90 $360 $0 00 $5,400
5x10 50 240 240 21 1% 12.000 135 $110 2.70 2 20 32.400
7 5x10 75 35 35 3 1% 2.625 165 2.20 0.00 5.775
10x10 100 240 240 21.1% 24.000 195 160 1.95 1.60 45.800 10x12.5 125 65 10 75 6.6% 9.375 220 185 1 76 1.48 16,150 10x15 150 120 41 161 14 2% 24.150 245 205 1.63 1 37 37.605 10x20 200 110 88 198 17 4% 39.600 280 235 1.40 1 18 51.480 10x25 250 33 33 2 9% 8.250 290 240 1.16 0.96 7.920
10x30 300 60 60 5 3% 18,000 390 325 1 30 1 08 19500
12x25 300 35 35 3 1% 10,500 400 335 1 33 1 12 11 725
1 100.0% 150,000
Avgs: 132 $1.57 $206.64

Page 204 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 590 of 1671 PE YTU\ REE l) ('mnpuny
Preliminary Report 174
September 23, 6 2021

Page 5 ends

6. 10.
ll.

12. Given the location adjacent to StorQuest, it would be advantageous to differentiate the projectfrom the competitionby creating a “landmark” building with an “eye catching” architectural element.

This can also be accomplished by bold graphics on the building. See Exhibit B for examples.

The large size of the center building suggests an opportunityto create an enjoyable interior environment. In this regard. I recommend color coding the ailes using bright cheery colors, naming them as streets with appropriategraphics and installingan intercom system with music, comedy clips and news ?ashes etc. to add interest. Also. the intercom system should be placed in a way to allow customers to conveniently communicatewith the of?ce from any aisle within the building.

A bright, open, well fenestrated of?ce space with an ample zoned space for retail products will be essential. In addition, a sit-down counter for customer to ?ll-out forms should be incorporated, along with sitting area for children and friends/family that may be with the customers.

A state-of—the-artsecurity system should be incorporatedand placed for easy viewing by customers. This will enhance the perceptionof tight security.

It should be noted here that during the initial rent-up period, rent concessions will doubtlessly be required to achieve the absorption goal. These can take many forms. with common discounts such as 50% off the ?rst month, or one month free, etc.

It will be of critical importance to have a comprehensive website that presents the full array of advantages, features, space rents. specials and renting proceduresin an easy to read format, navigate and print. In addition, it should have a virtual tour capability.

Page 205 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 591 of 1671 PEYTONREEI) Compan)
Pierce St
2 IS eJOLUIIL-J
Polk St
E m2: .2 wbSEmUEEmb
2 950mg; 955 55:5
man5.625 Eu 9E2. 598
NENIBE. AnaEHOEmiaou

IS EWJV
.nl. w”
m8
mm
w :30 men
.8

55.5.3 on 0:53

3. «253
m><3:2 cat 3:2
2 BET
m><Hm_.
o><ucw
an
son 3!
mv
uosmyer
r553
mmcz? :
mm:
3'590 Dr
,5 2.2253
9?. ES w><£3 a
0: Ems
E :3ch 09m
?nuaELoAm
, ocean—
Jetter§on

Page 206 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 592 of 1671 PE YTOA REED &Compam
Map Project
Kev Location
1 10
11 Prime Storaqe
42925 Madison/Indie Blvd SW
StorAmerica
43421 Monroe/43rd SW
AAA
82521 Market/44th SW
A Storage Place
83950 Ave 45/Jackson NE
StorAmerica
45800 Flower/Hwy 111 NW
A Storage Place
Marilyn/111 SW
Safeguard Self Storage
80166 Hwy 111/Shields NW
StorQuest 1/
83655 Date/Calhoun SE
StorQuest
83614 Dr Carreon/Calhoun NE
StorAmerica
49901 Oates/Ave 50 NW
Right Space
53301 Hiwv111/Ave54 NW
Totals/Survey Sample
Averages:

TABLE 1
August 2021
Year Stories
Built Quality
01 1
very good
05 1
very good
87 1
fair
85 1
verv Good
77 1
fair
95 1
Door
02 1
very good
03 1
poor
15 1
very good
06 1
good
90 1
fair
1/ Managed from Dr Carreon office

SUMMARY CHARACTERISTICS

FOR SELECTED SELF STORAGE PROJECTS

INTHE INDIOCMA
Total SF
Rentable

58.400

72.000
43,500

74.000
103.500
44,000

80.000

66.200

52.500

57.000

40.000
e
691 ,100
62,827
Total SF Vacancy
Vacant
900
250
50 250

1.320

2.800
250
5,820
Factor

1.5°/o

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

0.6%

0.0%

2.5%

4.9%

0.6%

0.8%

Page 207 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 593 of 1671

PE YTONREEI)
vwEnzo?mw.
9 EDGE: 2
”525m umm5><
Ewm mama: mumawEu C
85555 or Hum—.055 m
3020.05 m
Emaam?w N
00505 x
cms<§m m

2.50% < v <<< n NUCMEKEBW N
Ew mEtm F
529i )3.
an:
mmzcmmwas»: Ema 3903‘
$QO ESE E
SEE/«BE. o—
_wm:C._2w_
uwmzoho~m_
Ch
390% <—
SEE/toa—
E 399w .3 <5: mocmEEEm.
2w oEcn:
«Nnvmmhm

Page 208 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 594 of 1671 PE YTON REED 83mCompany 59m
88m 22m
Emzm?mm
82a 8.6 <
nothiSm ,.
82m 85 <
<<<
murmEiSw
mN
o»
03 ooww
omww
oomw
cme
com»
omna
oovw
on...»
,‘ . .! llinil

Page 209 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 595 of 1671 PE YTOA REED Compaq)
owxm
2N
oodw
88 oo.3
on.5
oodw
OWN»

Page 210 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 596 of 1671 PE I TON REED Compmu
TABLE 5

ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTIONOF UNITS

BY STANDARD SPACE SIZE

FORTHE INDIOCMA
September 2021
Space Total % Dist Total SF % Dist
Size (SF) Units Units Space Space
25 322 7% 8,050 1.5%
50 1.104 24% 55.200 10.0%
75 138 3% 10,350 1.9%
100 1.196 26% 119.600 21.7%
150 690 15% 103.500 18.8%
200 828 18% 165.600 30.0%
250 138 3% 34.500 6.3%
300 184 4% 55.200 10.0%
Totals: 4.600 100% 552.000 100.0%
Average:

Standard sizes estimated at 80% of the total.

Bold = highest concentrations of units and space.

Vacancy
Factor
0 0%

0.7%

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

2.2%

3.3%

1.0%
Vacant
Summary
10x10&<
Avg

0.4%
10x15+
Avg

1.6%

Page 211 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 597 of 1671 5 o o o o o o a PM an an an «h we on 25.03
guano. 35m...=<
5 8.25 oz 3 3:8
ms; cmmmEsmwm .302 ”202
".93043 09.34 veto."—
"220...
wotmESo?
«$3086
.3586
3206-23 “5358mm
mormEEo?
322m «Era
5:30..
.86...
or
PE YTON REEl
) &Company

Page 212 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 598 of 1671 PE
.80...
>226 $339..wa EE?mqm
52655 <
cozwoOJ >w¥
Luno_m>on_:oo_.o._n.an:

YTUN REED Campan y

Page 213 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 599 of 1671 PE YTONREEI) 8cCompan
u®uc=9 mBnEzc =(
waxm 5:53:00 wumwmp.231:
cons—301
ONQN
coed?
000. S;
vomé
oomdm
oovdwr
omvd
oom.vm
oomNor
0004mm
mmEQo ”ouSow
c3305
“888:.
\ F QNON
”.8205
“mmmmbg
rmom
”5030:.

8.8.0:.

EON
OOON
veto".

Page 214 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 600 of 1671 Tota 479.710
PE YTON REEI) Company

RELATIVECOMPETITIVE INFLUENCE

AND PER
TABLE 9

CAPITA USE FACTOR

FOR SELECTED SELF STORAGE PROJECTS

IN THE INDIO CMA
Map Project
Key Location
1 10
11 Prime Storage
42925 Madison/Indie Blvd SW
StorAmerica
43421 Monroe/43rd SW
AAA
82521 Market/44th SW
A Storage Place
83950 Ave 45/Jackson NE
StorAmerica
45800 Flower/Hwy 111 NW
A Storage Place
Marilyn/111 SW
Safeguard Self Storage
80166 Hwy 111/Shields NW
StorQuest 1/
83655 Date/Calhoun SE
StorQuest
83614 Dr Carreon/Calhoun NE
StorAmerica
49901 Oates/Ave 50 NW
AAA Storage of Coachella
53301 Hiwy 111/Ave 54 NW
ls
Total Population/CMA:

Per Capita Use Factor:

California:

August 2021
Total SF
Rentable

58.400
72,000
43,500
74,000
103.500

44.000

80.000

66.200

52.500

57.000

40.000
691.100
Est %
in CMA
40%
50%
70%
80%
100%
100%
30%
100%
100%
50%
30%

7.5 1/ Represents the equivalent of 7.5 directly competitive projects.

Net SF
in CMA

23.360

36.000

30.450

59.200
103.500

44.000

24.000
66,200
52,500

28.500

12.000
128,400

3.74 5.53

Page 215 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 601 of 1671 PE YTON REED Company
TABLE 10

ESTIMATEDANNUALDEMAND

FOR NEW SELF-STORAGE SPACE

INTHEINDIOCMA
2021-2026
Per Capita Space
CMA Use Factor Demand
Year Population 1/ (SF) 2/ (SF)
2021 128,400 3.74 480.
216
2026 141,000 4.30 606.441
Period Increase: 126,225
Annual Increase/Space Demand: 25,245
CMA Monthly Absorption Potential: 2.

RIT 2,100 104
Notes: 1/ Population ?gures from Table 8.
2/ Per Capita Use Factor from CMAsurvey (see Table 9). Assumes 15% increase for the 5-year period.

Page 216 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 602 of 1671

YTONREEI) &
TABLE 11

ESTIMATEDDEMAND

FOR NEW SELF-STORAGE SPACE

FROM NEWHOMEBUYERSANDRENTERS

FOR THE INDIOCMA
2021-2026
Components of New Home Demand Buyers Renters Total
New housingunits over norm/yr/CMA: 1/ 200 120
% of new buyers/renters using self-storage: 2/ x 35% x 25% Total newhome self-storage users 70 30 100
% using self-storage/CMA: 2/
7 x 90% x 90%
Total self-storage users/CMA 63 27 90
Avg space (SF) required/user; 3/ x 200 x 75
Total space demand/movers/CMA: 12,600 2,025 14,625
Avg Space (SF) Demand/month/CMA: 1.050 169 1.

RIT 219 1,200
1/ Estimated in?uence from higher rate of growth than normal. 1.0% for California vs. 2.0% for Indio.
2/ Peyton Reed & Company estimate based on
interviews with sales and rental agents.
3/ Peyton Reed &Company estimate based on
interviews with self-storage managers.

Page 217 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 603 of 1671 prejeci 5,434
PE YTU V REED &('umptm)‘
TABLE 12

ENTRY/EXITMARKETFAIR SHARE

AND PROPOSED PROJECT SHARE ANALYSIS

FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
2021-2026
Source of Demand Space (SF)
Total competitive space/CMA: 1/ 479,700
Total space vacated & rented per month: 2/ x 8%
Total space available for re-renting: 38.376
Fair share for each competitive project &the proposed: 3/ x 11.8% Total space rented for each project including the proposed 4528 Proposed project increase over fair share: 4/ x 120%
Total space rented at the proposed
Proposed project incremental increase over fairshare: 5/ 906 Additional monthly absorption potential for the proposed project: 906 RIT 900
1/ See Table 9
2/ From Self-Storage Almanac, average length of tenancy = 12 months. i e. 8% of total space vacated and rented per month 3/ Fair share (equal share) for each project. ie equivalent of 7 5 projects in the CMA (from Table 9), plus the subject = 8.5. 4/ Estimated increase for the subject over the fair share level due to locational and product advantages.
5/ Difference between the subject and share and fair share Note: Entry/Exit market expresses new users (entry) and those who vacate (exit) a unit/no longer need storage. Differentiated from turn—over of space such as retail, industrial, of?ce and apts, where most users who vacate re-rent a different space in

Page 218 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 604 of 1671 PE YTOA RE ED Cumpmu

EXHIBIT B

BUILDING SUPER GRAPHICS EXAMPLES

Page 219 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 605 of 1671 &
mwev we,» 7» gr: yr. ‘23:" ':v H»; ; “m; $113173 7
7 7
Qt GIL/I’M?! TIO VS .4 VD EXPERIE VCIE
PE YTON REED Company
As an independent consultant. I established
Peyton Reed & Company as a research and
consulting organimtion sem'ng the building
industry. I provide research and consulting
services to builders. developers. lenders and
investors involved in all types of residentialand
commercial real estate. The approach to serving
clients‘ needsfocuseson my personal
involvement at all levels of the researchprocess.
and a work product custom-made to the speci?c
requirements of each analysis.

Since estabIIShingPeyton Reed& Company. my
analyses and involvement Imve contributed to the
success of over 400 projects in California and
other states. In total. I have conducted more than

1.900studies in 130 marketareasthroughout the
US. including urban. suburban and rural
communities in 34 states and Puerto Rico. This
extensive geographic exposure. and experience
with diverse product types enables me to quickly
understand the dynamics of any marketplace. and
relate its particular characteristics and trends to
my experience elsewhere. Thus. I provide my
clients with a valuable perspective that is unique
among research consultants.

In addition to my broad geographicexperience.
my analyses have includedvirtuallyevery type
of real estate product. market and problem. The
following is a list of the types of projects
encompassed by my research experience:

Residential
Detached sales housing
0 Attachedsales housing
a Garden apartments
0 Mid and high-rise condominiums and
apartments
Second homes
Recreational land
Time share
Equestrian and estate residential
Condominiumconversions
- Master planned communities
Retirement housing
Mobilehome parks
Commercial
Retail
Industrial
Of?ce
Self-storage
0 Hotel
Mixed-use developments
All of the above studies included comprehensive
analyses of the competition: economict
employmentand demogaphic characteristics
and trends; plus an investigationof consumer
attitudesand preferences.Typically.these
studies result in detailedproduct design criteria
pricing recommendations. absorption estimates.
and an identification of the target market
audience pro?le.

The scope of studiesconducted ranges from
small in-?ll projects to large-scale masterplanned communitieswith severalthousandunit and numerous residential product lines, as well s as commercialand a varietvof otherland uses.

My forte is translating market ?ndings into
detaileddesign criteriaand/or marketing
recommendations. I offer my clients a wealth of
experienceand an exceptional trackrecord.

Brochure available on request

Page 220 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 606 of 1671 S ELF—STOR-I GE
PE YTON REEI) Company
.mv’<
!
My self-storage experiencehas encompassedover 350 studiesfor self-storage andRV storage i n
20 states. Analysesrange from single-story all drive-up suburban facilities to multi-story urban projects. Amenities include climate—controlledspace, wine storage and business centers For each study, the objective is to quantify the supply/demand characteristicsof the market area and to assess the viability of the project. My analysis and recommendationsaddress, site plan, architecture, space mix, rents and special space/services to be offered The following is a list of successfully completed projects for which I provided a market analysi s and pricing and productrecommendations

Page 221 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 607 of 1671 Fanh'an Pruiuu Lumliun Sim SF
PE YTUV REEI) CVumpany
Proiect. Size SF
Olympic Center. Huntington Bch 116.000
Store-for-Less. Long Beach 48.000
All AmericanSS.Minneapolis 37.000
All American SS. Minneapolis 61.100
American Mini-Storage. Norco 77.000
UniversalSS.Lorna Linda 90.000
Storage Guys. Fair?eld 87.000
Baseline SS. Fontana 87.000
First Choice SS. Fontana 60.000
Universal SS. Highland 98,000
Global SS. Norco 57.000
Ladera Ranch SS. Ladera Ranch 100.000
Baf?n Bay SS.Lake Forest 103.800
Magellan Storage. Torancc 123.100
Platinum SS.Phelan 50.000
Beaumont SS. Beaumont 74.000
Empire SS. Hesperia 78.600
Empire SS. Lake Elsinore 60.900
Rancho Cucamonga RV & SS 49.000
Ridgecrest SS & RV. Ridgecrest 68,000
UniversalSS.San Bernardino 96.100
UniversalSS.Hesperia 96.700
Beyond Storage. Pico Rivera 110.000
Extra Space. MorenoValley 86.500
MagellanStorage. Costa Mesa 108.000
National Storage Centers.Palmdaie 79.300
A Storage Place.Hornet (p11H) 80,000
Mira Mar Place SS.San Diego 130.000
Mesquite SS. Palm Springs 90.000
Dollar SS. Henderson. Nev 100.000
Vault Storage. Anaheim 90.000
Extra Space. Sacramento. dntn 100.000
Magellan Storage. Commerce 134.000
US Storage Center. Simi Valley 72.000
Park Cit) Storage. Park City. UT 78.000
Cave Creek Storage. Phoenix. AZ. 80.000
I-5 Storage. Tustin CA 180.000
Rose Citv SS. Portland. OR. 50.000
Dollar SS. Glendale.AZ 76.000
Security Storage.Indie * 104.000
Storage 1.West LA * 77.000
U-Stor.Tempe. AZ * 54.000
UncleBob‘s SS. Dutute 73.000
Edgernark SS. Denver. CO 78.000
Broncos Parkway SS, Cntnl.CO 64.000
CubeSmart.Nanuct. NY
Extra Space. S San Diego 75,000
Salinas Self-Storage. Salinas 60.000
Dollar Self-Storage. Jurupa Valley 86.000
Alton SS.Irvine 157.000
Extra Space. Lompoc 67.000
Anchor Self-Storage. Vallejo 75.000
West Coast Storage. Bellevue.WA 103,000
Monument Hill SS. Monument.CO 60.

Extra Space. Waipahu. HI 000 55.000
Dollar Self-Storage, N Las Vegas 89,000
Dollar Self-Storage, Peoria.AZ 100.000
Great Value Storage, Santa Clarita 105.000
Sundance Self-Strg. Buckeye, AZ 102.

StorAmerica Scottsdale.AZ 000 89.

Surprise Self-Storage. Surprise. AZ 000 96.000
StorAmerica. Peoria. AZ 96.000
StorAmrica.SunCity. AZ 86.000
Friendly Self-Storage. GypSum.CO. 36.000
Dollar Self-Storage. Goodyear. AZ 95.000
‘ Market analysis and repositioning

Page 222 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 608 of 1671 PE YTOV REEI) (e Company
Seq
#
mN
Market Area Corona Norco Norco Fontana
Ontario
Lynwood
Highland Loma Linda
Ladera Ranch
San Bemardino
Rancho Cucamonga Lake Forest Cordelia Fontana Fair?eld
Beaumont
Sacramento.downtown
Norco
Sacramento.Rancho Cordova
Sacramento. Elk Grove
San Juan Capistrano
Lake Forest Las Vegas. Nev
Roseville Costa Mesa Phelan
Hawaiian Gardens Torrance MorenoValley
Lompoc Los Angeles. downtown
Hesperia
Colton
Lake Elsinore
Yucaipa
Palm Springs Torrance Cordelia
Hespena
Sacramento North Highlands
Pioo Rivera
San Bernardino El Segundo Palmdale San Diego
Bend.Oregon
Redlands
Canoga Park Commerce Rockliin
Victorvdle
Hemet
Simi Valley
Fowler
Tustin
Palm Desert Henderson. Nev Anaheim
Sacramento downtown
Fremont Hawthorne Lake Los Angeles
South Gate
GlenAvon
Rialto
Bloomington
San Jacrnto Pico Rivera
Project
Size (SF)
135.000
76 800 58.500

96.000

75.000

80.000

98.500

90.000
100.000

70.000

45.000
136.000
130.000
60 000 84.500

70.000
100.000

58.000
120.000

88.400

67.700
103.000

74.000
100.000
100.000

50.000
119.000
127.000

70.000

70.000
187.000

80.000

75.000

76.000

85.000

87.000

75.000
11 1.000

98.000
100.000
1 14.000
97 000

89.000 79.000 130.000
60 000 57.000

80.000
117.000 80.000
146.000

72.000

80.000
140.000

97.000

87.500

90.000 80.000

69.000
104.600

30.000

88.800

49.000
107.000

84.000

80.000

82.000
seq
3‘
69 70
7172
73 74
75 7677
78 79
80 8182
838485
86 87
88 89
9091
92 9394
95 9697
98 99
100 101 102
103
104
105 106 107
108 109
110
111 112 113
114 115
116
117
118 119
120 121
122
123
124
125
126 127
128
129
130 131 132
133
134
135
136

SELF-STORAGE MARKETSTUDIES

PERFORMED BY PEYTON REED & COMPANY
Since 2000
Market Area Vallejo Woodland North Las Vegas
lndio
Orland
Victorville
East Los Angeles
Ridgecrest
Bellevue. WA Commerce
Rockford. Ill
Cansbad
Yucaipa
Anaheim
San Bemardino Menifee
Loma Linda
lmpenal
Manna del Rey Park City. Utah
Garden Grove
Missoula. Montana
Mcreno Valley
SusanVille
Cathedral City
French Valley
San Jacinto
Phoenix. AZ Queen Creek.AZ
Mammoth Lakes
Perris VictorVille North Las Vegas
Murrieta
Escondido
Oakland
Oakland Palm Springs
St Louis.MO
Queen Creek.AZ
Palmdale
MiraLoma
Lompoc
Portland. OR
San Bernardino
Lake Elsinore
lndlo
West Los Angeles
Vallejo San Jose Glendale. AZ Tempe. AZ
Duane
Westminster Sacramento Lompoc
Centennial. CO
Vallejo
Denver.Co downtown
IrVine Santa Clara Tracv Livermore
Lake Elsmore
Jurupa
Denver. CO
Centennial. CO
Tacoma. WA
Project
Size (SF)

37.000

75.000

89.950

83.350

80.000

87.500

75.000

40.000
116.000
110.000

40.000
148.000

82.000

99.000

75.000

80.000

86.000
100.000
112.000

80.000

55.700

40.000
120.000
127.000

40.000

73.500
104.700

8.400

80.000

88.000
108.000

80.000
167.000

53.800
103.500
100.000

90.000

80.000
100.000
100.000

50.000

60.000

90.000

73.000
100.000

77.300

92.000

88.000

62.000

52.000

50.000

80.000

65.000

67.000

65.000

75.000

72.000
150.000

75.000

89.000
82 000

62.000

99.000
75,000
67 000 80.000
Seq
lit
137
138 139 140
141
142 143
144 145
146
147
148
149 150
151 152
153
154
155
155
157 158 159
160
161 162
163
164 165
166
167
168 169 170
171
172
173 174 175
176
177 178
179 180
181 182
183
184
185 186 187
188 139
190
191
192
193
194 195
196
197
198 199
200
201
202
203 204
Market Area Bellevue.WA
Monument. CO Milpitas
Fontana
Nanuet. NY
Spokane. WA
Chandler. AZ
Irvine
Milpitas
San Leandro
Costa Mesa So Sacramento Vallejo
Ft Collins. CO
Milpitas
Broom?eld.CO
Huntington Park
Colorado Springs. CO
Santa Clarita
Lake Elsmore
Lake Forest Houston.TX
Long Beach
Sparks. NV
Peron‘a.AZ Mumeta Brentwood N Ca
Oakley
Longmont. CO
Madiaon.AL Bay Point
Lakewood. CO Waipahu. HI Salinas
Woonsocket.RI
Menifee East Menifee French Valley
Corona
Wildomar
Sacramento
San Bemardino
Palmdale Mumeta Buellton
Peroria.AZ Goodyear. AZ
Happy Valley. A
Tempe. AZ Carlsbad Anthem.AZ Corona
Santa Clarita
Omaha. NE
San Antonio.Tx Grass Valley
Oakland
Aspen. CO
Florence.AZ
Colorado Springs. CO
Broom?eld.CO
Temecula Sacramento
Sacramento
FrenchValley
Sacramento
North Highlands. Sacto Escondido
Project
Size (SF)
116.
00060.000
133.
0002.

60. 000
000 7.
119.000 000
157.
000 100.
120. 000
00075.

45. 000
000 77.000
100.
00099.
100. 000
00080.
100. 00
000 100.
00070.
100.0
00063.
000 80.

70. 000
100.000 000

93.000 94.
000 78.

48. 500
800 5.
000 53.

75. 000
000 55.
000 50.
100. 000
000 109.
000 148.000
91 . 100.000
000 165.
100. 0
00090.
000 35.

44. 000
000 60,00

90. 140. 000
000 100.
00080.000
120.000

38. 23. 000
112. 000
00065.
109. 000
00051.
000 35.
000 31.
100. 000
000 45.
100.0000

64. 120. 700
00080.
000 91.
120. 00
00063.000 73.

Page 223 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 609 of 1671 PE YTUN REEI) &Company
Market Area Omaha. NE
Hawthorne
Maneson. IL
Temecula
Colorado Springs. CO
Temecula Las Vegas. NV
Elk Grove
Hollister
Temecula
Gypsum. CO
Florence. AZ Enterprise (Las Vegas). NV
San Jose
Oakland
Englewood. CO Denver. CO
Queen Creek. AZ Mesa. AZ
Peoria. AZ
Surpnse. AZ
Buckeye. AZ
Benicia
Jurupa Valley
Lafayette. CO
San Jose
Santa Clarita
Fountain Hills.AZ
Carbondale. CO
Stockton Salinas
5 Sacramento
Henderson.NV
5 Sacramento
Lebanon. 0R
Colorado Springs. CO Vallejo
Vacaville
Medtord.OR
Wildomar
Menifee
Richland. WA
Temescale Valley
San Jose
LosAngeles
French Valley
Newark
Florence.AZ
Buckeye. AZ
Santa Fe Springs
Chula \?sta
Avondale. AZ
Santa Clarita Glendale. AZ Aspen. CO
Boise.ID
Lake Elsinore Fresno Rosewlle
Mesa. AZ Azusa Henderson. NV Mammoth Lakes
Omaha.NE
Carson
Project
Size (SF)
91 .000
112.000
100.000

28.000

88.000
102.000
_ 69.000

95.000

80.000

75.000

60.000
100.000
100.000

70.000

84.000
146.000
100.000

82.000

90.000

80.000

84.000
65 000 99.000

69.000

40.000
115.000

40.000

92.000

30.000 43.000

52.000
103.000

66.000

50.000

50.000 90.000

75.000

50.000
145.000
105.000
75 000
150.000

80.000
138.000
100.000
125.000
100.000

84.000

75.000

90.000

75.000
11 5.000
119.000

24.000

54.000

83.000

46.000 120.000
100.000
125.000
125.000

56.000

67.000

50.000
Seq
#
270
271
272 273
274
275
276 277 278
279
280
281 232
283
284
285 286
287
238 289
290 291
292 293 294 295
296
297
296
299 300
301 302
303
304
305 306 307
305
309 310 311
312
313
314 315
318 317
31 B
319 320
321
322 323 324 325
326
327 328
329
330
331 332 333
334

SELF-STORAGEMARKETSTUDIES

PERFORMED BY PEYTON REED & COMPANY
Since 2000

Page 2 ends

Market Area
Temecula
Fair?eld
College Station.TX
Santa Maria
Palm Desert
Nampa. ID
Glenwood Springs. CO Menifee
Scottsdale.AZ
Carlsbad
Centerville. MN
Central Los Angeles N Las Vegas
Mankato.MN
Carbondale. C0
Peoria. AZ
Surprise. AZ Buckeye. AZ Chandler.AZ Peoria.AZ
Wildomar
Colorado Springs. CO
Palm Desert Truckee Escondido
Penis
Mesa.AZ
Concord
Glendale. AZ
Las Vegas. NV Murneta
Phoenix.AZ
Camarillo
San Jose Azusa
Jurupa Valley
Los Banos Fountain Hills.AZ
Temescal Valley San Jose Riverside
Enterprise. NV
Glendale.AZ
Riverside
Scottsdale.AZ
Enterprise. NV
Hollisler
Tucson
Nampa. ID
Fresno
Orov1lle
Fannington. NM
Redding Des Moines. IA Gardena
San Diego
Avondale.AZ
Lake Havasu City AZ
Las Vegas. NV
San Tan Valley. AZ Martinez
American Canyon
Litch?eld Park. AZ
Tempe. AZ
So Sacramento
Project
Size (SF)

40.000

83.000

70.000
100.000

30.000
100.000

30.000
123.000

89.000

03.000

30.000
100.000

90.000

60.000

76.000

96.000

96.000
102.000

92.000

07.000
166.000

76.000

50.000

87.000

97.000
100.000

90.000
100.000
110.000

85.000 79.000

67.000

60.000

22.000
125.000
100.000

60.000

20.000
100.000

98.000
117.000

90.000

77.000
115.000

22.000

94.000

75.000

79.000

73.000

70.000

50.000
100.000

40.000

77.000
100.000

80.000

76.000
100.000

90.000

92.000
270.000

40.000

61.000

85.000
100.000
Seq
#
335
336 337
338
339
340
341 342 343
344
345
346 347 340
349
350 351
352
353 354
355
356
357
350 359 360
Market Area
Longmont. CO
Buckeye. AZ
San Jose Azusa
Monterey Park
Oroville
Murrieta
Santa Maria
Sonoma
Ehrenberg. AZ
Post Falls. ID
Big Bear City
Hunytington Beach
Fremont
Torrance
Cupertino
Wildomar
Henderson. NV
Orange
W LosAngeles
South Gate
Pico Rivera
Medford. OR
Indio Valley Center
Sonoma
Project
Size (SF)

39.000

57.000
100.
000 106.
00081.000

50.000

90.000

93. 000 75.
000 2.
000 5.000

40. 110. 000
105. 000
00088.
160. 000
000 153.
000 144.
000 114.
00096.
130. 00
00050.
000 5.000
150.000

55. 27. 000
000

Page 224 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 610 of 1671 Mini-Storage and Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities Community Survey 1 / 6

76.32% 29

23.68% 9
Q1 Do you believe that the City has too many self-storage/mini-storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities?
Answered: 38 Skipped: 1
Total Respondents: 38
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No

Page 225 of 263 ends

Mini-Storage and Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities Community Survey 2 / 6

21.05% 8

78.95% 30
Q2 Do you believe that the City needs more self-storage/mini-storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities?
Answered: 38 Skipped: 1
Total Respondents: 38
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No

Page 226 of 263 ends

Mini-Storage and Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities Community Survey 3 / 6

84.21% 32

15.79% 6
Q3 Do you believe that the City should limit new self-storage/mini-storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities?
Answered: 38 Skipped: 1
Total Respondents: 38
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No

Page 227 of 263 ends

Mini-Storage and Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities Community Survey 4 / 6

61.76% 21

32.35% 11

17.65% 6
Q4 If you believe that the City should limit new self-storage/mini-storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, how should it do so? Please select one from the list below:

Answered: 34 Skipped: 5
Total Respondents: 34
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Prohibit new
facilities
Limit the
total number...

Require that
facilities b...

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Prohibit new facilities
Limit the total number of facilities in the City – for example, no more than 25 Require that facilities be a certain distance apart – for example, be a ½ mile apart

Page 228 of 263 ends

Mini-Storage and Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities Community Survey 5 / 6
Q5 Please provide any additional comments below:

Answered: 15 Skipped: 24
# RESPONSES DATE
1 We definitely have more than we need. 11/5/2023 3:26 PM 2 Interesting analysis of the jobs and taxes. And coming from someone who will need RV storage soon but I don’t think we need so many locations
11/4/2023 10:41 AM
3 They should be away from homes, best place would be next to the freeway or next to commercial buildings. We should not have to see unsightly buildings pop up randomly throughout the city. 11/4/2023 9:07 AM
4 More storage facilities goes against what Indio is trying to do. Upgrade the city. Storage facilities bring property value down and create security issues. Has anyone checked to see capacity of those already built? My guess is it is just a money grab, meanwhile taking down Indio a notch or two. Let's see better quality added to the city, not more fast food, storage facilities, and gas stations!
11/4/2023 8:52 AM
5 If the current storage places are almost all filled then yes another business should be approved. 11/4/2023 8:02 AM 6 We have too many in the City Of Indio now, as it stands, and some of the facilities look, beat up, worn down and need to be more attractive
11/4/2023 6:45 AM
7 Prohibit the facilities to price gouge the customers. Because of demand, they sky rocket their pricing making it unaffordable for a long term storage user.
11/3/2023 11:53 PM
8 Building more storage/rv garages Is enough for the city we need more retail development opportunities and more shopping center ideas with more full service restaurants like Texas Roadhouse on Jackson st for example 11/3/2023 10:21 PM
9 You must remember, new planned communities do NOT allow RV storage on the homeowners property or in communal parking areas. Garages that the city approves barely fit a car, must less anyplace for storage. Many HOA's do not allow parking of commercial vehicles (Plumbers, Electricians Gardeners etc.), even in the owner's own driveway. The only recourse a citizen has, is storage facilities. We need a ratio of storage to estimated need, not just a random number. neighboring cities are a poor judgement of the needs of our city. Tax generation as a decision making process is not ,in the long term, in the citizens best interests.
11/3/2023 7:52 PM
10 If you already have 15 storage facilities and another 7 in the pipeline that is already too many. I would prohibit all future facilities
11/3/2023 7:31 PM
11 Junky looking! 11/3/2023 5:35 PM
12 I would ask that the units are in areas that are not so noticeable and ask for good desert scape so that they blend with the surrounding areas. The one by Tractor Supply is almost not noticeable. The one at the Golf Center and 111 is old and very noticeable.
11/3/2023 5:32 PM
13 We have too many now. We should save some land for other businesses that bring jobs. 11/3/2023 5:21 PM

Page 229 of 263 ends

MiniS
torageandRecreational VehicleStorageFacilitiesCommunitySurvey 6/6
14Weneedmoresupermarketsnotmini storagefacilities11/3/20235:00PM 15 It isaconstantbattletofindavailablestoragespaceforRV'sespecially largerones. Withall newhomesbeingbuiltwith HOA 'sandrulesagainststoringaRVatyourhome itwill getworse. Don'tforgetthatwhilearenot largesorceofmoneyfor thecitytheyalsomakeminimal demandsonthecityforservices. Theyalsofill aneedforresidentsasadirectresultofthe rulesprohibitingRV'stostoredathome. 1
1/3/20234:44PM

Page 230 of 263 ends

2 Hidden Palms '
('
' E
Ramon Rd 3lekl Ave
0 ’00, i I
Vii/77 / 1130/: I l I 4173
.
,3 .- i Sto ra e FaCIlltleS 1
2 AAAStorage Of Indio Indio
. A7744)? 3 AllInside Storage Indio
,4
2y Ranch '7 4 ASP-Indio II Self Storage LLC Indio
L
i
" 1’VCl U n
v IC‘oaLhetlla i
‘ 5 Prime Storage Indio LLC Indio I
a ey a iuna Wildlife Refuge ' 6 Safeguard Self Storage LLC Indio ‘
‘
Biskra Palms 7 Storquest Indio / Jackson Indio
‘ F
2535? Club 8 PavilionRVStorage Indio
a nurse r"!
m F
9 Self Storage Indio
‘0(
,
old i 00% p
10 Storquest Indie / Dr Carreon Indio .5\i,
”0;”, 11 BenloRV Storage Indio
‘
4>
ank siimra Drive
a
00 Avenue 33
Dese" Palms
Avenue as 12 Shields Storage Indio '3 i
5 “av/9 : a 13 Indio Palms RV Storage Indio i
cDueuSneff FCaliiusb Pam WHEY V305 27 i: EE 14 Storamerica Indio y
(“WW 0“” 26
.
. E i g 15 Extra Space Storage Indio
25 g 16 Cruising Cones LLC Indio
7 .
24 17 Indio Self Storage Indio
(13:13:31: (
Shad” “"5 *7 18 Ranch RVAnd Self Storage Indio
Indian Ridge : Golfclub News N S ... _ Country Club 3 a i; 19 West Coast Storage Facilities Indio City of g 30 Bermuda BerniAi‘irdgirm 13 20 Entersprlse Self Storage Indlo - 2078
llnvley Lane E Palm 5' Dunes
Avcniic 41 Avt‘o471 The Go” CM, 21 Storquest Self Storage La Quinta A E T L .

C Tuscan:l b
DESert E Unincorporated 00°: 5
11 rQ—u— . at ma ago 22 Storquest Self Storage La Quinta 0“"er “ 3 Riverside '. .14 43in Ave 23 Extra Space Storage La Quinta CPalmDealer; Dad?’cbul'lty Ken?er Ave 24 Extra Space Storage Bermuda Dunes oumry u _
rim Wm H‘iq Di ricn Waring Di 2
25 meStorage PalmDesert
Indian Wells @215!
4 26 Security PublicStorage PalmDesert
60” “we . r 27 Security PublicStorage Bermuda Dunes
Indian Wells MilesAvs- Miles Ave Avenue 4)
‘
Eag'e ””5 GD” 28 Coachella Self Storage & RV Coachella SlissAveIndlo 9 13 Come F DY El meme an .040 29 Luxtor RV Coachella
""W‘W \ éz‘zl‘nagyv‘gl'l:
‘ 23 .- Twenterine 30 StorQuestSelf Storage Bermuda Dunes El Dorado *i ‘
2 Palm ——
‘ 7; Reservation Q; A 3' 11 AVENIF A7
4 i 3
‘
4 ‘. ‘1 g 22’ D
1 ' Z“ 43m AW Avenue 48
' City of H 3,
La Quinta Aveime 49 g 01% 29
D Clty Boundary
' L Q r 5 E // ”I -. i f, V wing/loin : g a; .28 Status I N ’ “ Aiieiiiie so Avenue an 94 g Avenue su C h ll
.Active (14)
2, w a? mac e a
‘ ‘ _
IINDII0
La an(a A
It
3 a City of
.Bulldmg Penmt Process (6)
son a Club M V f g
V V . “gun"nfryc‘j‘fb‘wczuu?niar'ync?u “ewe 51 a? Coachella .Out51deof City Boundaries (10) take center stage Esri,NASA, NGA, USGS, FEAEA, CountygofRiversiileTtlalifnmia Slale Parks, E < r E
Aven enuo sz 3 U Avenue 52
1 Mountain gin i T a v: 'tu. ‘. l u
a W W
mm W Demlapm5en1ce\\waagefxcLhry\Srmlgan€thyaprx DaleSmed s 151024Page 231 of 263 AGENDA ITEM #8.16 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 617 of 1671 Name of Storage Facility Address City Type of Storage Zone Designation Status Squarefootage Acre Total SF Rentable Est. Property Tax To Indio General Fund for 2022 (8.5%) A STORAGE PLACE‐INDIO LLC ‐ Coachella Valley Storage 46148 MARILYN ST Indio Self Storage Highway 111 Specific Plan (NG) Active 133,967.06 3.07 44,000.00 2,595.32 AAA STORAGE OF INDIO 82521 MARKET ST Indio Self Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Active 103,769.32 2.38 43,500.00 1,598.69 ALL INSIDE STORAGE 84400 CABAZON CENTER DRIVE Indio Self Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Active 190,503.56 4.37 106,593.00 xxxxx ASP‐INDIO II SELF STORAGE LLC ‐ A STORAGE PLACE 83050 AVENUE 45 Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Active 200,971.10 4.61 74,125.00 4,443.81 PRIME STORAGE INDIO LLC 42925 MADISON ST Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Active 153,954.62 3.53 58,400.00 1,732.22 SAFEGUARD SELF STORAGE LLC 80166 HIGHWAY 111 Indio Self Storage Highway 111 Specific Plan (NG) Active 216,445.24 4.96 80,000.00 4,990.40 STORQUEST INDIO / JACKSON 42625 JACKSON ST Indio Self Storage Regional Commercial (RC) Active 54,000 1 70,000 xxxxx PAVILION RV STORAGE 84350 CABAZON RD Indio Self Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Active 189,564.54 4.35 89,905.00 4,261.59 SELF STORAGE 45800 FLOWER ST Indio Self Storage Highway 111 Specific Plan (NG) Active 248,887.85 5.71 103,500.00 4,388.88 STORQUEST INDIO / DR CARREON 83614 DR CARREON Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Active 417,606.97 9.58 118,700.00 10,155.39 BENLO RV STORAGE 84401 CABAZON CENTER DRIVE Indio RV Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Active 195,003.08 4.47 100,320.00 xxxxx SHIELDS STORAGE 47550 SHIELDS RD Indio RV Storage Mixed Use Neighborhood (MUN) Active 173,278.60 3.97 99,500.00 631.25 INDIO PALMS RV STORAGE 45755 COMMERCE ST Indio RV Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Active 137,438.23 3.15 61,245.00 STORAMERICA 43421 MONROE ST Indio Self Storage Neighborhood Center (NC) Active 141,502.58 3.24 72,000.00 4,599.00EXTRA SPACE STORAGE 82815 AVENUE 42 Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Planning ‐ Approved 177,684.59 4.07 86,063.00CRUISING CONES LLC 612‐110‐041 Indio RV Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Planning ‐ Approved 19,924.48 0.45 9,576.00INDIO SELF STORAGE 610‐030‐001 Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Planning ‐ Approved 223,805 5 92,427 RANCH RV AND SELF STORAGE 83734 DR CARREON Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Planning ‐ Approved 359,532.67 8.25 WEST COAST STORAGE FACILITIES 612‐130‐008 Indio RV Storage Light Industrial (IL) Planning ‐ Approved 199,682.90 4.58 81,928.00 ENTERSPRISE SELF STORAGE 611‐410‐065, 066, 067, 068, 070, 071, 072, 075 Indio RV Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Planning ‐ Approved 233,236.01 5.35 113,903.00STORQUEST SELF STORAGE 47350 DUNE PALMS ROAD La Quinta Self Storage Active STORQUEST SELF STORAGE 79315 HWY 111 La Quinta Self Storage ActiveEXTRA SPACE STORAGE 46600 ADAMS ST La Quinta Self Storage ActiveEXTRA SPACE STORAGE 78265 COUNTRY CLUB Bermuda Dunes Self Storage ActiveLIFE STORAGE 40050 HARRIS LANE Palm Desert Self Storage ActiveLIFE STORAGE 39700 GARAND LN Palm Desert Self Storage Active SECURITY PUBLIC STORAGE 39505 BERKEY DR Palm Desert Self Storage Active COACHELLA SELF STORAGE & RV 49901 OATES LN Coachella Self Storage Active LUXTOR RV 49751 OATES LN Coachella RV Storage & Service Active Potential Self Storage Facility 691‐190‐040 Indio Self Storage Regional Commercial (RC) Inquiry Potential Self Storage Facility 691‐070‐017 Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Inquiry Potential Self Storage Facility 691‐120‐011 Indio Outdoor RV Storage Sun City PMP Inquiry Potential Self Storage Facility 610‐270‐076 Indio Self Storage Light Industrial (IL) Inquiry Potential Self Storage Facility 611‐410‐030 Indio Warehouse Self Storage Heavy Industrial (IH) Inquiry Potential Self Storage Facility 606‐060‐002 Indio Garage Storage Light Industrial (IL) Inquiry

BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS

OUTSIDE OF INDIO
Recent Inquired Locations

Page 232 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 618 of 1671 ORDINANCE NO. 1791

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN INTERIM MEASURE IMPOSING A

MORATORIUM ON THE USE, CONSTRUCTION, ESTABLISHMENT OR

OPERATION OF NEW SELF -STORAGE FACILITIES, MINI -STORAGE

FACILITIES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITIES WITHIN

THE CITY OF INDIO EXCLUDING NON-COMMERCIAL FACILITIES

CONSTRUCTED WHOLLY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF A LEGALLY

OPERATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR THE SOLE USE AND

BENEFIT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of Indio' s police power, the City Council of the City of Indio (" City Council") has the authority to enact and enforce ordinances and regulations for the public peace, morals and welfare of the City and its residents; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65858 provides that, without following the procedures otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance and for the purpose of protecting the public safety, health and welfare, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency measure, an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses which may be in conflict with "a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the City Council, planning commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of Indio recommended on February 8, 2023 on a 5 to 0 motion the enactment of a moratorium on self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities following prior discussions on the land use and economic development implications of such facilities at duly advertised public meetings relative to the land use and economic development vision, goals and policies of the City of Indio General Plan 2040 adopted on September 18, 2019; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is concerned that self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities may be incompatible with the public health and safety of Indio and the City Council believes that careful consideration and thorough study of potential regulations pertaining to these facilities is required; and elorl)
WHEREAS, to address community concerns regarding the planned proliferation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, it is necessary for the City Council study the potential impacts such uses may have on the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing and those matters determined at the meeting at which this Ordinance is introduced and adopted, the City Council finds the use, construction, establishment and/or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities would pose a current and immediate 1

Page 233 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 619 of 1671 threat to the public health, safety or welfare, and that a temporary moratorium is thus necessary; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is an interim urgency ordinance adopted pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Government Code Section 65858 and is for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the urgency are:

1. The City is concerned with the public nuisance caused by self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, involving the following:
a. The presence of thirteen ( 13) existing and active facilities in the City b. The total of four (4) pending additional facilities currently going through the City' s land use entitlement approval processes.
c. The total of three ( 3) facilities that have received land use entitlement approvals and are pending required engineering or building approvals. d. The receipt of nine ( 9) inquiries regarding potential additional storage facilities within the City during 2022.
e. The current market focus on the City for these types of facilities and the limited number of current facilities outside the City inclusive of two (2) facilities in the City of Coachella, three ( 3) facilities in the City of La Quinta, three (3) facilities in the City of Palm Desert and one ( 1) facility in unincorporated Bermuda Dunes.
f. The limited economic benefit of such facilities in terms of property tax generation, sales tax generation and employment generation. g. The current limited supply of light industrial and heavily industrial zoned lands within the City and the potential loss of future economic opportunity for the City through the continued absorption and utilization of this limited land supply for self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities.

2. The City Council desires to investigate and study the impacts of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities; and

3. Absent the adoption of this Ordinance, the use, construction, establishment or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City may pose a serious threat to public health and safety, enl introducing incompatible land uses to existing neighborhoods or in close proximity thereto; and

4. Absent the adoption of this Ordinance, the number and location of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities may increase the burden upon City services; and
2

Page 234 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 620 of 1671

5. As a result, it is necessary to establish a temporary, forty-five ( 45) day moratorium on the use, construction, establishment and/ or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City, pending completion of the City' s study of the potential impacts; and

6. In addition, it is necessary to prohibit, as a public nuisance, the use of any structure for self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities for the duration of this Ordinance, or any extension thereof; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines, by at least a four -fifths ( 4/5) vote, that this urgency ordinance is a matter of City- wide importance, is a reasonable and necessary measure designed for the immediate preservation and protection of the public health, safety or welfare of the community, and is in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local laws and requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CEQA.

The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060( c)( 2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; and it prevents changes in the environment pending the completion of the contemplated municipal code review.

SECTION 2. INCORPORATION.

The recitals and statements of fact set forth in the preamble to this Ordinance are true and correct, constitute a substantive part of this Ordinance, and are incorporated herein by this reference. Based on those facts, the City Council finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety pursuant to, and as authorized by, Section 65858( a) of the California Government Code. Accordingly, this Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 3. DIRECTION; DEFINITION.

It is necessary to establish a temporary, forty-five ( 45) day moratorium on the use, construction, establishment and/ or operation of new self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities pending completion of the City' s study of the potential impacts and regulation of such, and possible amendments to the City' s zoning ordinance and related provisions of the Indio Municipal Code to ensure that adequate development standards and implementation regulations are in effect prior to 3

Page 235 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 621 of 1671 permitting such within the City of Indio. To that end, the City Manager is directed to analyze the appropriateness of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities within the city limits of the City of Indio, including but not limited to, the desirability, appropriateness and effectiveness of development standards and regulatory controls.

For purposes of this Ordinance, self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities shall mean any building, equipment, facility or any other type of structure erected, placed, located or maintained that provides for the storage of private and personal real property, vehicles and equipment.

This moratorium shall not be interpreted as affecting the use or operation of any:

1. Legally existing self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City; or

2. Self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities that have not yet been completed but which are subject to:
a. A vesting tentative map; or
b. Development agreement; or
c. For which a building permit has been issued and in good faith reliance on such issuance substantial work has been completed and substantial liabilities incurred.

3. New self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities that will be constructed wholly within the boundaries of a legally operated Homeowners Association, will be used only and solely for the benefit of the members of the Homeowners Association and will not at any time be rented or otherwise made available to non- members of the Homeowners Association.

4. Those facilities for which a land use application was previously submitted and deemed complete.

SECTION 4. MORATORIUM ESTABLISHED.

In accordance with the authority granted to the City of Indio by California Government Code Section 65858 and for the reasons set forth herein above, commencing as of the effective date of this Ordinance and continuing thereafter for a period of forty-five ( 45) days, no approvals may be made or issued by the City, its officers or employees of any applications for a use permit, variance, building permit, business license or any other applicable entitlement or permit, for the use of any land within the City or the construction, ,.. establishment or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities For the period of this Ordinance, or any extension thereof, a self - storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities shall be considered a prohibited use in any zoning district of the City and neither the City Council nor City staff shall approve any use permit, license, certificate of occupancy, zoning code or general plan amendment authorizing the use of any land within the City as self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities. 4

Page 236 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 622 of 1671 SECTION 5. PROHIBITION.

No person shall commence, construct, establish, or operate any self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, as defined in this Ordinance, within the City limits of the City of Indio during the period this Ordinance is in effect.

SECTION 6. VIOLATION A PUBLIC NUSIANCE.

The construction, establishment or operation of any self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities as defined in this Ordinance, within the city limits of the City of Indio during the period this Ordinance is in effect is declared to be a public nuisance and poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare. No property in any zone of the City is to be used for purposes of a self - storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities during the period this Ordinance is in effect. The use of any property for such purpose shall be a public nuisance. A violation of this Ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be contrary to the public interest and shall, at the discretion of the City, create a cause of action for injunctive relief as well as any other available civil remedies. Additionally, any person that violates this Ordinance may be subject to the City' s applicable administrative remedies.

SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY.

The City Council of the City of Indio hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, term or word of this Ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid; it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination here from of any such portion as may be declared invalid. If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one ( or more) section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 8. REPORT.

The City Manager is authorized and directed to prepare the report required by paragraph d) of California Government Code Section 65858 describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to adoption of this Ordinance for presentation to the City Council no later than ten ( 10) days prior to the expiration of this Ordinance.

SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE; FOUR -FIFTHS VOTE REQUIRED.

This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption if adopted by at least a four -fifths ( 4/5) vote of the total members of the City Council and shall be in effect for

Page 237 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 623 of 1671 forty-five ( 45) days from the date of adoption, unless extended by the City Council as provided in California Government Code Section 65858.

SECTION 10. PUBLICATION.

The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance or a summary thereof to be printed once within fifteen ( 15) days after its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Indio.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2023.

ATTEST:

SABDI SANCHEZ, CMC

CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATOR

OSCAR ORTI
MAYOR
rl

Page 238 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 624 of 1671 Aak

CERTIFICATION
I, Sabdi Sanchez, City Clerk Administrator of the City of Indio, California, hereby certify that Urgency Ordinance No. 1791 was duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the 15th day of March 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

Ayes: Fermon, Holmes, Miller, Mayor Pro Tem Ramos Amith and Mayor Ortiz Noes: None
Publication Date: March 23, 2023
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Indio, California, this 15th day of March 2023. 1 Zp

SABDI SA EZ, CIVIC
City Clerk Administrator
City of Indio

Page 239 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 625 of 1671 ORDINANCE NO. 1793

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYIOF

INDIO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING AN INTERIM MEASURE IMPOSING

A MORATORIUM ON THE USE, CONSTRUCTION, ESTABLISHMENT

OR OPERATION OF NEW SELF -STORAGE FACILITIES, MINI -

STORAGE FACILITIES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE

FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF INDIO EXCLUDING NOW

COMMERCIAL FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED WHOLELY WITHIN THE

BOUNDARIES OF A LEGALLY OPERATED HOMEOWNERS

ASSOCIATION FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF THE MEMBERS

OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND LAND USE

ENTITLEMENT OR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANTS SPECIFIED

HEREIN AND DEETERMINING THAT THIS ACTION IS NOT SUBJECT

TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ( CEQA)
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15060( C)( 2) ( THE ACTIVITY WILL NOT

RESULT IN A DIRECT OR REASONABLY FORESEEABLE INDIRECT
PHYSICAL CHANGE IN THE ENVIRONMENT) AND 15060( C)( 3) ( THE ACTIVITY IS NOT A PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 15378) OF

THE CEQA GUIDELINES, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS,
TITLE 14, CHAPTER 3, BECAUSE IT HAS NO POTENTIAL FOR

RESULTING IN PHYSICAL CHANGE TO THE ENVIRONMENT,
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY; AND IT PREVENTS CHANGES IN THE

ENVIRONMENT PENDING THE COMPLETION OF THE

CONTEMPLATED MUNICIPAL CODE REVIEW
WHEREAS, at the regular public meeting on March 15, 2023, the City Council of the City of Indio found that the use, construction, establishment and/ or operation of self - storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or welfare, and therefore adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1791; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, Ordinance No. 1791, as an interim urgency ordinance, expires 45 days after approval, unless the City Council by a four -fifths vote, after notice has been given pursuant to Government Code 65090 and a public hearing, extends Ordinance No. 1791 for 10 months and 15 days; and dg
WHEREAS, the City Council directs City staff to undertake further study and present its recommendations to the City Council regarding permanent revisions to the City' s regulatory scheme regarding self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, that are consistent with the City' s General Plan, Planning and Zoning Law, and the provisions of Government Code Section 65858; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is concerned that self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities may be incompatible with, the use and 1

Page 240 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 626 of 1671 enjoyment of property in the City of Indio and the City Council believes that careful consideration and thorough study of potential regulations is required; and WHEREAS, to address community concerns regarding the proliferation of self - storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, it is necessary for the City Council study the potential impacts such uses may have on the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing and those matters determined at the meeting at which this Ordinance is introduced and adopted, the City Council finds the use, construction, establishment and/ or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or welfare, and that a temporary moratorium is thus necessary; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is an interim urgency ordinance adopted pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Government Code Section 65858 and is for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the urgency are:

1. The City is concerned with the public nuisance caused by self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, involving the following:
a. The presence of thirteen ( 13) existing and active facilities in the City b. The total of four (4) pending additional facilities currently going through the City' s land use entitlement approval processes.
c. The total of three ( 3) facilities that have received land use entitlement approvals and are pending required engineering or building approvals. d. The receipt of nine ( 9) inquiries regarding potential additional storage facilities within the City during 2022.
e. The current market focus on the City for these types of facilities and the limited number of current facilities outside the City inclusive of two ( 2) facilities in the City of Coachella, three ( 3) facilities in the City of La Quinta, three ( 3) facilities in the City of Palm Desert and one ( 1) facility in unincorporated Bermuda Dunes.
f. The limited economic benefit of such facilities in terms of property tax generation, sales tax generation and employment generation. g. The current limited supply of light industrial and heavily industrial zoned lands within the City and the potential loss of future economic opportunity for the City through the continued absorption and utilization of this limited land supply for self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities.
2

Page 241 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 627 of 1671

2. The City Council desires to investigate and study the impacts of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facillities; and

3. Absent the adoption of this Ordinance, the use, construction, establishment or IMI, operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City may pose a serious threat to public health and safety, introducing incompatible land uses to existing neighborhoods or in close proximity thereto; and

5. As a result, it is necessary to establish a temporary, forty-five ( 45) day moratorium on the use, construction, establishment and/ or operation of self - storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City, pending completion of the City' s study of the potential impacts; and

WHEREAS, the City Council determines, by at least a four -fifths ( 4/5') vote, that the extension of the moratorium is a matter of City- wide importance, is a reasonable and necessary measure designed for the immediate preservation and protection of the public health, safety or welfare of the community, and is in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local laws and requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. CEQA.

The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060( c)( 2) ( the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060( c)( 3) the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA 'Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; and it prevents changes in the environment pending the completion of the contemplated municipal code review.
111
3

Page 242 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 628 of 1671 Section 2. INCORPORATION.

Section 3. DIRECTION.

It is necessary to extend for 10 months and 15 days the moratorium established by Ordinance No. 1791 pending completion of the City' s study of the potential impacts and regulation of such structures and uses, and possible amendments to the City' s zoning ordinance and related provisions of the Indio Municipal Code to ensure that adequate development standards and implementation regulations are in effect prior to permitting such structures and uses within the City of Indio. To that end, the City Manager is directed to analyze the matter, including but not limited to, the desirability of such structures and uses, the appropriateness and effectiveness of separation requirements from adjacent sensitive land uses, and the extent of adequate development standards and regulatory controls, should such structures and uses be deemed appropriate.

This moratorium shall not be interpreted as affecting the use or operation of any:

1. Legally existing self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City; or

Page 243 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 629 of 1671 Those facilities for which a land use application was previously submitted and deemed complete consisting of the following:

Extra Space Storage
Cruising Cones LLC
Indio Palms RV Storage
Indio Self Storage
Ranch RR And Self Storage
West Coast Storage Facilities
Indio RV Storage
82815 Avenue 42
Assessor Parcel No. 612- 110- 041
45755 Commerce Street
Assessor Parcel No. 610- 030- 001
83734 Dr. Carreon Boulevard
Assessor Parcel No. 612-130-008
611- 410- 065, 066, 067, 068, 070, 071 072, 075
Section 4. MORATORIUM EXTENDED.

In accordance with the authority granted to the City of Indio by California Government Code Section 65858 and for the reasons set forth herein above and Urgency Ordinance No. 1791, the moratorium established by Ordinance No. 1791 is here by extended for an additional 10 months and 15 days, and no approvals may be made or issued by the City, its officers or employees of any applications for a use permit, variance, building permit, business license or any other applicable entitlement or permit, for the use of any land within the City or the construction, establishment or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities For the period of this Ordinance, or any extension thereof, a self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities shall be considered a prohibited use in' any zoning district of the City and neither the City Council nor City staff shall approve any use permit, license, certificate of occupancy, zoning code or general plan amendment authorizing the use of any land within the City as self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities.

Section 5. PROHIBITION.

Section 6. VIOLATION A PUBLIC NUSIANCE.

Page 244 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 630 of 1671 the period this Ordinance is in effect. The use of any property for such purpose shall be a public nuisance. A violation of this Ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be contrary to the public interest and shall, at the discretion of the City, create a cause of action for injunctive relief as well as any other available civil remedies. Additionally, any person that violates this Ordinance may be subject to the City's applicable administrative remedies.

Section 7. SEVERABILITY.

The City Council of the City of Indio hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, term or word of this Ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid; it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination here from of any such portion as may be declared invalid. If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone ( or more) section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 8. REPORT.

Section 9. EFFECTIVE DATE; FOUR -FIFTHS VOTE REQUIRED.

This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption if adopted by at least a four -fifths (4/5) vote of the total members of the City Council and shall be in effect for 10 months and 15 days from the date of adoption, unless extended by the City Council as provided in California Government Code Section 65858.

Section 10. PUBLICATION.

The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of
Ordinance or a summary thereof to be printed
adoption in a newspaper of general circulation,
Indio.
this Ordinance and shall cause this
once within fifteen ( 15) days after its
published and circulated in the City of

Page 245 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 631 of 1671 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of April, 2023.

ATTEST:
mn-c

SABDISAN MC

CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATOR
6 6L -

OSCAR ORTI
MAYOR
7

Page 246 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 632 of 1671

CERTIFICATION
I, Sabdi Sanchez, City Clerk Administrator of the City of Indio, California, hereby certify that Urgency Ordinance No. 1793 was duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the 19th day of April 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

Ayes: Fermon, Holmes, Miller and Mayor Ortiz
Noes: None

Absent: Mayor Pro Tern Ramos Amith
Publication Date: April 26, 2023
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Indio, California, this 19th day of April 2023.

SABDI SANCHEZ, CMC
City Clerk Administrator
City of Indio
1

Page 247 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 633 of 1671 ORDINANCE NO. 1810

AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE PROVISIONS1 OF ORDINANCE 1793 UNTIL JULY 19 2024, IMPOSING A MORATORIUM

ON THE USE, CONSTRUCTION, ESTABLISHMENT OR OPERATION OF

NEW SELF -STORAGE FACILITIES, MINI -STORAGE FACILITIES AND

RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY

OF INDIO EXCLUDING NON- COMMERCIAL FACILITIES

CONSTRUCTED WHOLELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF A

LEGALLY OPERATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR THE SOLE

USE AND BENEFIT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE HOMEOWNERS

ASSOCIATION AND LAND USE ENTITLEMENT OR BUILDING PERMIT

APPLICANTS SPECIFIED HEREIN AND DEETERMINING THAT THIS

ACTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT ( CEQA) PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15060( C)( 2) ( THE

ACTIVITY WILL NOT RESULT IN A DIRECT OR REASONABLY

FORESEEABLE INDIRECT PHYSICAL CHANGE IN THE
ENVIRONMENT) AND 15060( C)( 3) ( THE ACTIVITY IS NOT A PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 15378) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES,
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 14, CHAPTER 3,

BECAUSE IT HAS NO POTENTIAL FOR RESULTING IN PHYSICAL
CHANGE TO THE ENVIRONMENT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY; AND

IT PREVENTS CHANGES IN THE ENVIRONMENT PENDING THE

COMPLETION OF THE CONTEMPLATED MUNICIPAL CODE REVIEW
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Article XI, section 7, of the California Constitution, the City of Indio ("City") has the police power to adopt and enforce ordinances to regulate the use of land within its jurisdictional boundaries, to the extent such regulations are not in conflict with the general laws of the State of California; and,
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65858 expressly authorizes the City Council, to protect public health, safety and welfare, to adopt an interim urgency ordinance prohibiting a use that is in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission or the planning department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time, provided that the urgency measure shall require a four -fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption, and shall be of no further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption, unless duly extended; and,
WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 36934 and 36937 expressly authorize the City Council to enact urgency ordinances, which take effect immediately upon introduction, for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety,

Page 248 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 634 of 1671 containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and which must be passed by a four -fifths vote of the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2023, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1791, establishing a 45- day moratorium on the use, construction, establishment or operation of new self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational storage ! facilities determining that these uses would pose a current and immediate threat to public health, safety, or welfare within the City of Indio (the "Moratorium"); and, WHEREAS, on April 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 1793, extending the Moratorium for an additional 10 months 15 days; and, WHEREAS, the Moratorium will expire on March 6, 2024, unless extended pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, which authorizes the City Council, after notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, to adopt an ordinance extending the Moratorium until July 1, 2024, upon approval by a four -fifths vote, and upon making the same findings required for the adoption of the Moratorium; and, WHEREAS, the City Council had and still has concerns regarding new self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational storage facilities and their potential incompatibility with the use and enjoyment of Indio and the City Council believes that careful consideration and thorough study of potential regulations for these uses is still required; and,
WHEREAS, due to unforeseen operational challenges resulting from limited staff resources and high workload volume, City staff has been unable to complete all required work within the initial timeframe established by the City Council including the study of the potential impacts such uses may have on the public health, safety and welfare; and, WHEREAS, the completion of remaining required work tasks pertaining to the moratorium on these land uses will assist the City Council in determining whether any changes to current regulations and standards contained in the City of Indio Unified Development Code need to be made; and,
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing and those matters determined at the meeting at which this Ordinance is introduced and adopted, the City Council finds the use, construction, establishment and/ or operation of structures upon the water would pose a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or welfare, and that a temporary moratorium is thus necessary; and,
WHEREAS, Ordnance No. 1793 was an interim urgency ordinance adopted pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Government Code Section 65858 and was for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the urgency were:
2

Page 249 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 635 of 1671

1. The City is concerned with the public nuisance caused by self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities, involving the following:
a. The presence of thirteen ( 13) existing and active facilities in the City b. The total of four ( 4) pending additional facilities currently going through the City' s land use entitlement approval processes.
c. The total of three (3) facilities that have received land use entitlement approvals and are pending required engineering or building approvals. d. The receipt of nine ( 9) inquiries regarding potential additional storage facilities within the City during 2022.
e. The current market focus on the City for these types of facilities and the limited number of current facilities outside the City inclusive of two ( 2) facilities in the City of Coachella, three ( 3) facilities in the City of La Quinta, three '(3) facilities in the City of Palm Desert and one ( 1) facility in unincorporated Bermuda Dunes.
f. The limited economic benefit of such facilities in terms of property tax generation, sales tax generation and employment generation. g. The current limited supply of light industrial and heavily industrial zoned lands within the City and the potential loss of future economic opportunity for the City through the continued absorption and utilization of this limited land supply for self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities.

2. The City Council desires to investigate and study the impacts of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities; and

3. Absent the adoption of this Ordinance, the use, construction, establishment or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City may pose a serious threat to public health and safety, introducing incompatible land uses to existing neighborhoods or in close proximity thereto; and

4. Absent the adoption of this Ordinance, the number and location of 'self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities may increase the burden upon City services; and in the City, pending completion of the City' s study of the potential impacts; and

WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to extend the Moratorium until July 1, 2024 to allow itself, the Planning Commission, City staff and interested parties to complete the 3

Page 250 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 636 of 1671 necessary study of any potential changes to current land uses and development regulations pertaining to self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council determines, by at least a four -fifths ( 4/ 5) vote, that the extension of the moratorium is a matter of City-wide importance, is a reasonable and !'! necessary measure designed for the immediate preservation and protection of the public health, safety or welfare of the community, and is in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local laws and requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. CEQA.

The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060( c)( 2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060( c)(3) the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; and it prevents changes in the environment pending the completion of the contemplated municipal code review.

Section 2. INCORPORATION.

The recitals and statements of fact set forth in the preamble to this Ordinance are true and correct, constitute a substantive part of this Ordinance, and are incorporated herein by this reference. Based on those facts, the City Council finds, determines and declares that this Ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety pursuant to, and as authorized by, Section 65858(a) of the California Government Code. Accordingly, this Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

Section 3. DIRECTION; DEFINITION.

It is necessary to extend until July 1, 2024, the moratorium established by Ordinance No. 1793 pending completion of the City' s study of the potential impacts and regulation of such structures and uses, and possible amendments to the City's zoning ordinance and related provisions of the Indio Municipal Code to ensure that adequate development standards and implementation regulations are in effect prior to permitting such structures and uses within the City of Indio. To that end, the City Manager is directed to analyze the matter, including but not limited to, the desirability of such structures and uses, the appropriateness and effectiveness of separation requirements from adjacent sensitive land uses, and the extent of adequate development standards and regulatory controls, should such structures and uses be deemed appropriate.
4

Page 251 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 637 of 1671 For purposes of this Ordinance, self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities shall mean any building, equipment, facility or any other type of structure erected, placed, located or maintained that provides for the storage of private and personal real property, vehicles and equipment.

This moratorium shall not be interpreted as affecting the use or operation of alny:

1. Legally existing self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities in the City; or
i
1 2. Self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities that have not yet been completed but which are subject to:
a. A vesting tentative map; or
b. Development agreement; or
C. For which a building permit has been issued and in good faith reliance on such issuance substantial work has been completed and substantial liabilities incurrIred.

Those facilities for which a land use application was previously submitted and deemed complete consisting of the following:

Extra Space Storage
Cruising Cones LLC
Indio Palms RV Storage
Indio Self Storage
Ranch RR And Self Storage
West Coast Storage Facilities
Indio RV Storage
82815 Avenue 42
Assessor Parcel No. 612- 110-041
45755 Commerce Street
Assessor Parcel No. 610- 030- 001
83734 Dr. Carreon Boulevard
Assessor Parcel No. 612- 130- 008
611- 410- 065, 066, 067, 068, 070 071,
072, 075
Section 4. MORATORIUM EXTENDED.

In accordance with the authority granted to the City of Indio by California Government Code Section 65858 and for the reasons set forth herein above and Urgency, Ordinance No. 1793, the moratorium established by Ordinance No. 1793 is here by extended to July 1, 2024, and no approvals may be made or issued by the City, its officers or 'employees of any applications for a use permit, variance, building permit, business license or any other applicable entitlement or permit, for the use of any land within the City or the construction, establishment or operation of self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities 5

Page 252 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 638 of 1671 and recreational vehicle storage facilities For the period of this Ordinance, or any extension thereof, a self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities shall be considered a prohibited use in any zoning district of the City and neither the City Council nor City staff shall approve any use permit, license, certificate of occupancy, zoning code or general plan amendment authorizing the use of any land .., within the City as self -storage facilities, mini -storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities.

Section 5. PROHIBITION.

Section 6. VIOLATION A PUBLIC NUSIANCE.

Section 7. SEVERABILITY.

The City Council of the City of Indio hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, term or word of this Ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid; it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination here from of any such portion as may be declared invalid. If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone ( or more) section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional.
0

Page 253 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 639 of 1671 Section 8. REPORT.

Section 9. EFFECTIVE DATE; FOUR -FIFTHS VOTE REQUIRED.

This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption if adopted by at least a four -fifths ( 4/ 5) vote of the total members of the City Council and shall be in effect for forty- five ( 45) days from the date of adoption, unless extended by the City Council as provided in California Government Code Section 65858.

Section 10. PUBLICATION.

PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of March 2024.

ATTEST:

SABDISANCH , CMC

CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATOR
7

Page 254 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 640 of 1671

CERTIFICATION
I, Sabdi Sanchez, City Clerk Administrator of the City of Indio, California, hereby certify that Urgency Ordinance No. 1810 was duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the 6th day of March 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

Ayes: Ortiz, Fermon Holmes, Mayor Pro Tem Miller, Mayor Ramos Amith Noes: None
Publication Date: March 13, 2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Indio, California, this 6th day of March 2024.

SABDI SANCHEZ, CMC
City Clerk Administrator
City of Indio
1

Page 255 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 641 of 1671 3221 Hutchison Avenue, Suite D, Los Angeles, CA 90034 ◆ Phone (310) 838-2400 ◆ FAX (310) 838-2424 May 8, 2024
Honorable Chairperson Gloria Franz and Sent via e-mail to: [email protected] Members of the Planning Commission
150 Civic Center Mall
Indio, CA 92201
RE: Planning Commission Item 5.1, Proposed Resolution No. 2090 We appreciate the opportunity to provide this public comment letter on behalf of 1784 Holdings, LLC (“1784 Holdings”), developer of the approved Indio RV Storage project at the northwest corner of Enterprise Way and Van Buren Street (APNs 611-410-065, -066, -067, -068, -069, -070, -071, -072, and -075), across from the Valley Sanitary District treatment plant. This project was approved by the Planning Commission through Resolution No. 2065 on August 23, 2023. Since this approval, 1784 Holdings closed escrow on this property (under the legal entity name EWVBS-CA, LLC), and has been diligently advancing with the plan check process. 1784 Holdings understands the Planning Commission is considering proposed Resolution No. 2090, which would recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance prohibiting mini-storage, selfstorage, and RV storage facilities. If the Planning Commission adopts this resolution, and if City Council adopts an ordinance for such a prohibition, 1784 Holdings respectfully requests that the resolution and ordinance include language that clearly exempts storage facility projects with approved land use entitlements from any prohibition. Suggested language is listed below:

Nothing in this resolution/ordinance is intended to prohibit the establishment of those facilities for which a land use application was previously submitted and deemed complete prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 1791,1 which such facilities may be established and operated subject to the City’s nonconforming use regulations in Chapter 6.07 of the City’s Unified Development Code.
1784 Holdings is excited to continue moving forward with transforming their long-vacant property into an attractively designed, professionally managed storage facility, while meeting high local demand for this use and contributing to the community as a long-term corporate neighbor. We also appreciate your consideration of the above-requested language. If you have any questions, please contact me at [email protected] or (310) 838-2400 x110.

Sincerely,
Shane Stuart Swerdlow, Vice President
Craig Lawson & Co., LLC
1 Adopted on March 15, 2023, Ordinance No. 1791 established the moratorium on storage facilities.

Craig Lawson & Co., LLC
Land Use Consultants

Page 256 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 642 of 1671 From: Benjamin Egan
To: Kevin Snyder; Polo Doria; Shane Swerdlow; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Matthew Ottoson; Kate Rust; Peter Murray; [email protected]; [email protected]; Rick Leon; [email protected] Cc: Kendra Reif
Subject: RE: May 8, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 10:54:06 AM
Attachments: image008.png
image009.png
image010.png
image011.png
image012.png
image013.png
WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Kevin,
I do not know if I can make the meeting, but would like the concerns below shared with the planning commission and placed into the record.

My name is Benjamin Egan, and I am an Indio Resident, own one residential and two commercial properties within the City of Indio, and own Egan Civil, Inc. one of the few Civil Engineering Firms headquartered in the City of Indio. As a City of Indio Resident and Small Business owner, I am concerned about the land development regulations being proposed by the planning commission at this time.

While I understand the concerns about utilization of Industrial Land in the City of Indio, I think there are better ways to address those concerns than an outright ban on certain types of development. In reviewing the public record, I think much has been overlooked in the discussions about storage facilities. I agree that these facilities possibly should be limited, and development carefully considered in certain valuable areas, such as the Highway 111 corridor, portions of the Indio Blvd Corridor and at locations with immediate Interstate 10 Freeway Access such as within ½ mile of the Jefferson, Monroe, Jackson and Golf Center interchanges. However, there are other locations that have lay fallow for many decades and have existing permanent constraints that would make them good candidates for continuing to allow this kind of development.

For example, Commerce Street, south of Citrus Avenue south of the Border Patrol Facilities is of a completely different character than the above-mentioned locations. The proximity to the railroad, the VSD treatment facility, the wind and dust issues due to proximity to the wash, the sight distance issues with the intersection of Commerce Street and Avenue 45, as well as the lack of availability of power from IID, create unique challenges to development. They are not suitable for retail or office because of the noise levels from the railroad and the dust, and while they could support heavy industrial uses, they also are good locations for storage uses, which

Page 257 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 643 of 1671 have far lower electrical power requirements than heavy industrial uses. In fact, storage facilities would be good pilot projects for completely off grid electrical power systems due to their much lower power demands, and data collected from operating these facilities off-grid would be useful in developing ways of powering more intense electrical power users with completely off grid systems.

I am also concerned that I have seen no discussion of the Airport Land Use Commissions Bermuda Dunes Airport Land Use Plan and Countywide Policies included in any staff reports or discussion on this matter. For example, property located on the north and south side of Indio Blvd, at the T-Intersection with Jefferson Street south of Interstate 10 lies in a B1 Inner Approach/Departure per the Airport Land Use Plan for the Bermuda Dunes Airport published by Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. The airport land use plan recommends low height, low density, low intensity development in these areas to mitigate the potential for loss of life in the event of an aviation accident, with many types of development being outright prohibited. Storage facilities fit into the safety criteria for this zone nicely, and hence it would seem ill advised to outright ban a highly compatible use in an area with such constraints. (See https://rcaluc.org/sites/g/files/aldnop421/files/migrated/Portals-13-PDFGeneral-plannewplan-04--20Vol.-201-20County-20wide-20Policies.pdf and https://rcaluc.org/sites/g/files/aldnop421/files/2023-06/Bermuda%20Dunes.pdf) I would also point out that some areas of the City’s valuable industrial land are unavailable for development because of Government Agency interference. For example, approximately 16 acres of Industrial land on Oleander and Trader Place, close to the Monroe and Interstate 10 interchange, immediately east of the CV Mosquito and Vector Control Facility could support more employment generating uses but is presently owned by the CV Mosquito and Vector Control District, and are not on the market for sale or proposed for development. I don’t believe it was the intention when the CV Mosquito and Vector Control District was created that it would use public funds to secure and hold large swaths of land for no other purpose than a long-term investment. If the City is truly worried about the availability of industrial land that will generate employment opportunities, a more comprehensive study should be done on availability of land in the industrial zones, and if held by government entities, if they should be encouraged to divest the land if they do not have a use for it identified in their current development plans or budgets.

While I understand concerns about future availability for development that will improve employment opportunities, this can not be the sole consideration in outright banning a type of land use. Once construction is complete, housing does not generate significant employment, but no one would suggest a ban on building more housing, it is very much needed. Many religious organizations do not have paid clergy, but again, no one would propose a ban on building places of worship because they don’t generate employment, and they bring social benefits to the community. Likewise, development of Storage facilities needs to be approached with balance. Outright banning them could result in boats, rvs, cars etc… being crammed in people’s front yards and on the street. And while the argument may be made that

Page 258 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 644 of 1671 there are ordinances to prevent such, and that there are officers to enforce these ordinances, at what point does the lack of alternative storage locations become a problem. Hence a more responsible approach would be sound regulation, not an outright ban.

Also, the question should be asked why more employment intensive uses are not already occurring on these properties, as they are no way restricted from doing so in the current free market. Why, despite the availability of affordable industrial property, during a period of explosive growth in the Coachella valley and in the City of Indio over the past 2 decades, has there been a lack of development of warehouse, distribution, and manufacturing projects in the City’s industrial zones? Simply banning a certain type of land use that is in demand will not magically cause the type of development the City is seeking to occur. While it may be appropriate to regulate how much land is used for storage facilities, it would be shortsighted to implement an all out ban without researching, crafting, and adopting a plan to attract the type of development the City is seeking, otherwise the risk is the property will simply remain vacant for many decades, as it already has.

I also have not seen any discussion about the fact that the City of Indio, and the Coachella Valley have a unique situation, in that there are such a large number of seasonal residents.

This would obviously result in an increased demand for storage facilities when residents are away during the summer. Hence, adequate storage facilities are essential to continue to see growth in the tourism industry which the City of Indio and the Coachella Valley significantly rely on. While such development should be carefully regulated, an outright ban could be as shortsighted as allowing development of these facilities to spawn uncontrollably.

I only recently have had opportunity to research this matter, hence the concerns above are not a comprehensive list, but they do illustrate that the discussion of the matter to date is incomplete, additional facts should be considered, and that there is opportunity to pursue a much better solution of proper regulation of these type of facilities opposed to an outright ban on a land use that does serve a needed purpose and that clearly is in demand.

Regards,
Benjamin Daniel Egan, PE, PLS
Principal
Egan Civil, Inc.
(760) 404-7663 Office
(760) 898-1106 Cell
Mailing Address:

PO BOX 5282
La Quinta, CA 92248-5282
Physical Address:
46150 Commerce Street, Suite 100
Indio, CA 92201
[email protected]

Page 259 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 645 of 1671 From: Kevin Snyder <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 5:02 PM
To: Polo Doria <[email protected]>; Shane Swerdlow <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Benjamin Egan <[email protected]>; Matthew Ottoson <[email protected]>; Kate Rust <[email protected]>; Peter Murray <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Rick Leon <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: Kendra Reif <[email protected]>
Subject: May 8, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting
Hello. The Planning Commission will be holding its regular meeting on Wednesday, May 8, 2024 beginning at 6:00 p.m. Included on the agenda is a public hearing on the Commission’s recommendation to the City Council on storage facilities. You may access the meeting agenda at: https://indio.civicweb.net/Portal/. Thank you.

Kevin Snyder, AICP
Community Development Director
[email protected]
O:760.541.4255 | M:760.296.7303
100 Civic Center Mall · Indio CA
92201

Citizen Self Service Portal

Page 260 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 646 of 1671 City of Indio
Planning Commission Minutes
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Chairperson Gloria Franz called to order the Planning Commission Meeting for the City of Indio at 6:04 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 150 Civic Center Mall, Indio, California.

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

Present:

Chairperson Gloria Franz
Vice-Chairperson Jacqueline " Jackie" Lopez - arrived at 6:10 p.m.

Commissioner Nicco Alexander Ysiano
Commissioner Christian Rodriguez Ceja

Absent:

Commissioner Gabriel Fajardo
City Staff Present:

Kevin Snyder, Director of Community Development, Layla Sarwari, Assistant City Attorney, Kendra Reif, Principal Planner, Niko Guitron, Assistant Planner, Reymundo Trejo, IWA General Manager, Michelle Tse, IWA Administrative Services Manager, Paulina Mendoza, Commission Secretary.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
led by Commissioner Rodriguez Ceja

3. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None.

4. MINUTES

4.1 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 24, 2024 Motion was made by Commissioner Rodriguez Ceja to approve the minutes of the April 24, 2024, PC meeting, as presented. Commissioner Ysiano seconded the motion. Carried 4/0.

Chairperson Franz jumped to item 6.1

5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

5.1 Resolution No. 2090 - Recommendation from Planning Commission to the City Council recommending the approval of text amendments to the Unified Development Code and the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan to establish as prohibited land uses mini-storage facilities, self-storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities and recommending a determination of a commonsense

Page 261 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 647 of 1671 Planning Commission
May 8, 2024
exemption pursuant to Section15061( b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Kevin Snyder, Community Development Director presented the Staff Report.

Chairperson Franz opened the public hearing at 6:34 p.m. with public comments from:

Brian McCalum
Karen
Chairperson Franz closed the public hearing at 6:39 p.m.

Motion was made by Commissioner Rodriguez Ceja and seconded by ViceChairperson Lopez to approve Resolution No. 2090 recommending to City Council the approval of text amendments to the Unified Development Code and the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan to establish as prohibited land uses mini-storage facilities, self-storage facilities and recreational vehicle storage facilities and recommending a determination of a commonsense exemption pursuant to Section15061( b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, as presented by Roll Call Vote. Motion carried 4/0. Commissioner Fajardo was absent.

6. ACTION ITEMS

6.1 Proposed Adoption of Resolution 2088 Setting forth the FY 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program of the Indio Water Authority and Making General Plan Consistency Findings.

Reymundo Trejo, IWA General Manager presented the PowerPoint Presentation.

Discussion ensued.

Motion was made by Commissioner Rodriguez Ceja and seconded by Commissioner Ysiano to Adopt Resolution No. 2088, a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Indio, California, finding that the proposed Fiscal Year 2024- 25 Capital Improvement Program of the Indio Water Authority is consistent with the City of Indio General Plan 2040, as presented by Roll Call Vote. Motion Carried 4/0. Commissioner Fajardo was absent.

7. STUDY SESSION ITEMS- NONE

8. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Commissioner Rodriguez Ceja commented on the groundbreaking of the Indio Sports Park.

Page 262 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 648 of 1671 Planning Commission
May 8, 2024

9. STAFF ITEMS
Kendra Reif, Principal Planner, reported that Oasis at Indio (formerly BH Properties), will be holding a community meeting on Thursday, May 9th at 5:30 p.m. at the COD Indio Campus to go over project details and answer any questions from the community.

Kevin Snyder, Community Development Director, reported on the Community Development Budget for FY 24/25 which includes funds to support training for Planning Commissioners.

10. ADJOURN
There being no further business to discuss, Chairperson Franz adjourned the regular meeting at 6:47 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted,
Paulina Mendoza
Paulina Mendoza
Commission Secretary

Page 263 of 263 ends

Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1814 : Text Amendments to Section 2.04/F... Page 649 of 1671 City of Indio
City Council
July 17, 2024

STAFF REPORT
To: City Council
From: Bryan Montgomery, Executive Director
Prepared by: David Razo, Senior Management Analyst
Subject: Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed amount of $100,000 for Consulting Services Pertaining to Implementation of the City's Sixth Cycle Housing Element
RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Dudek in the not-to-exceed amount of $100,000 for consulting services pertaining to the implementation of the City's Sixth Cycle Housing Element.

SUMMARY:

The proposed Professional Services Agreement in the not-to-exceed amount of $100,000.00 with Dudek would provide needed assistance with the implementation of the City's Sixth Cycle Housing Element (2021-2029).

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

The City is currently in its 3rd year of implementation of the City's adopted Sixth Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan 2021-2029. The Sixth Cycle Housing Element 2021-2029 (Housing Element) is an 8-year plan that was initially adopted and re-adopted by the City Council on January 5, 2022, and submitted to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review as required by the State Housing Element Law. HCD subsequently determined that the Housing Element was in compliance with State Law and certified it on April 20, 2022. Indio was the first City in the Coachella Valley to receive the certification. Additionally, the City is working towards completing the final deliverables necessary for it's Pro-Housing Application designation through the HCD.

During that 8-year period of the Housing Element, the City is required to meet certain obligations to prepare for and address housing needs, including adhering to the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) that requires the City to plan for enough housing to accommodate all economic segments of the community as categorized by income levels. The Housing Element also requires the City to adhere to a demanding Housing Element Implementation Program that contains 37 general implementation focus areas (identified as "Implementation Programs" in the Housing Element) and 75 specific objectives that are meant to lead to the local removal of governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing.

On March 20, 2024, the City Council accepted the City's Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) and directed staff to submit the APR to the State as required by April 1, 2024. The APR reports the progress of meeting the Housing Element obligations for the previous calendar year, to AGENDA ITEM #8.17
Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 650 of 1671 the State. As was presented to the Council at that time, some objectives have been completed, while others are in-progress or pending implementation. As was also mentioned to the City Council at that time, due to the volume and complexity of the implementation objectives, staff contemplated needing consultant assistance to successfully complete some of the objectives that were pending completion or were due for completion over the course of this year. Consultant assistance for the Pro-Housing Designation will aid the City in completing the application.

Staff has determined that moving forward with a direct sole-source contract with Dudek would provide the City with the continuity of service and would help expedite the completion of several of the implementation programs and objectives (as described in Exhibit A of the Agreement).

Dudek has the knowledge, experience and expertise that set them apart from all other potential consultants at this moment. Dudek has provided recent significant services and has managed meaningful projects on the City's behalf in an efficient and cost-effective manner, including the recent Housing Element Update and the City's Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) Plan.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY:

Current FY Financial
Impact:

In current year budget: Yes
Current FY General
Fund Impact:
100,000 Budget adjustment:

Next FY Financial
Impact:

Strategic Objective:

Source of funds: Fund-Org-Object
Reference:

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1- PSA Dudek--Housing Element Implementation Services FY24.25 APPROVAL(S):

Kevin H. Snyder, Dir. Of Community Development Approved - 08 Jul 2024 Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Approved - 09 Jul 2024 Ruby D. Walla, Director of Finance Approved - 10 Jul 2024 Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager Approved - 11 Jul 2024

Page 2 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 651 of 1671

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF INDIO,

A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
AND
DUDEK

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Form Approved 09/01/2022

Page 3 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 652 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 1

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

FOR CONSULTING SERVICES PERTAINING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF

THE SIXTH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT,

BETWEEN THE CITY OF INDIO AND DUDEK
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 1st day of July 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF INDIO (“City”), a California municipal corporation and Dudek, a California corporation (“Consultant”). For the purposes of this Agreement City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS

1. City has sought by direct contract the performance of consulting services pertaining to Implementation of the Sixth Cycle Housing Element, defined and described particularly in Section 2, “Scope of Services and Schedule of Performance” of this Agreement.

2. Consultant was selected by City to perform those services.

3. Consultant was selected by City on the basis of Consultant’s demonstrated competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required.

4. Pursuant to the Chapter 33 of the Indio Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Agreement and the City Manager has authority to execute this Agreement.

5. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 “Scope of Services and Schedule of Performance” of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT
(a) Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is through June 30, 2025, unless the scope is completed prior to this date, commencing on Effective Date, unless otherwise extended by written agreement of the Parties.
(b) The City Manager may, in his or her sole discretion, unilaterally exercise an option to extend the Agreement on a month-to-month basis following expiration on the same terms

Page 4 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 653 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 2
and conditions, including compensation as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment.”
(c) Consultant acknowledges that the Agreement term may extend over multiple City fiscal years, and that work and compensation under this Agreement is contingent on the City Council appropriating funding for and authorizing such work and compensation for those fiscal years. This Agreement may be terminated by the City Manager at the end of a fiscal year when sufficient funding is not appropriated and authorized for the subsequent fiscal year. City is not obligated to pay Consultant for any amounts not duly appropriated and authorized by City Council.

SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE (a) SCOPE OF SERVICES. Subject to this Agreement, all addendums and exhibits attached and incorporated hereto, Consultant agrees to perform the services and tasks set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” (hereinafter, the “Services”) and the City agrees to retain and does hereby retain Consultant for the Services.
(b) SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. The Services shall be completed pursuant to the schedule specified in Exhibit “A.” Should the Services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Consultant shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce Section 21, “Default” of this Agreement and may instead allow Consultant to continue performing the Services.

SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

Consultant shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.

SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($100,00.00), unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement.

Payment shall be made in accordance with City’s usual accounting procedures upon receipt and approval of an itemized invoice setting forth the services performed. The invoices shall be delivered to City at the address set forth in Section 24, “Notices” hereof. Under no circumstances shall the total amount paid to Consultant under this Agreement exceed the

Page 5 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 654 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 3
City Manager’s authority under Indio Municipal Code Section 33.116 (C)(2) without approval by the City Council.
(b) Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subconsultant contracts. Subconsultant charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit “B” include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of tasks performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. (c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.
(e) If this Agreement is extended pursuant to Section 1 “Term of Agreement,” the City shall pay the same rates specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation.” SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.

City may inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Consultant’s work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Consultant’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Consultant’s work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 “Indemnification” and Section 17 “Insurance.”
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.

All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the

Page 6 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 655 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 4
Consultant. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.

If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant’s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 “Standard of Performance” of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.
(a) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ASSIGNMENT. For no additional compensation, Consultant hereby assigns to City all of Consultant’s rights, title, and interest in and to the content of all deliverable materials created by Consultant or its employees, agents, or subconsultants, including copyrights, in connection with the Services performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall promptly execute and deliver, and shall cause its employees, agents, and subconsultants to promptly execute and deliver, upon request by the City or any of its successors or assigns at any time and without further compensation of any kind, any power of attorney, assignment, application for copyright, patent, trademark or other intellectual property right protection, or other papers or instruments which may be necessary or desirable to fully secure, perfect or otherwise protect to or for the City, its successors and assigns, all right, title and interest in and to the content of the deliverable materials. For purposes of this section deliverable materials includes all works, tangible or not, created under this Agreement including, without limitation, documents, material, data, reports, manuals, specifications, artwork, drawings, sketches, computer programs and databases, schematics, photographs, video and audiovisual recordings, sound recordings, marks, logos, graphic designs, notes, website, domain names, inventions, processes, formulas matters and combinations thereof, and all forms of intellectual property. The provisions of this paragraph are binding on the successors, assigns and heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of Consultant’s Services under this Agreement.

SECTION 7. CONSULTANT’S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Consultant shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Consultant’s performance of the Services. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures.

Page 7 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 656 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 5
(b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Consultant’s address indicated for receipt of notices, “Section 24,” of this Agreement.
(c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors in interest and authorized representatives.

SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
(a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, subconsultants or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.

SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.

Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Consultant under this Agreement, and shall use such skill, prudence, and diligence as other members of Consultant’s profession commonly possess and exercise. In addition to the general

Page 8 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 657 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 6
standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” that shall also be applicable to Consultant’s work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.

SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.

Consultant shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws, ordinances and regulations, and shall be solely responsible for any failure to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has obtained or shall promptly obtain all necessary licenses to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement and that such licenses are in good standing. Consultant further represents and warrants that the services provided herein shall conform to all ordinances, policies and practices of the City. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS.
(a) Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects.

To the extent applicable, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless form any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure of Consultant to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
(b) It is the understanding of City and Consultant that Prevailing Wage Laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, “construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.

SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.

Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.

Page 9 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 658 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 7
SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.

SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant will, perform non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subconsultants, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

Page 10 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 659 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 8
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subconsultant of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. (d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subconsultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) INDEMNIFICATION BY CONSULTANT. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to City) and hold harmless City and any and all of its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, representatives and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all claims, actions and proceedings (whether at law or equity, administrative or judicial), demands, orders, judgments, losses, injuries (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Consultant or subconsultants), liabilities of every kind (including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, and litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and cost of investigation), damages, costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees and costs, (collectively "Claims") that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, any goods provided or performance of Services by Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, representatives, subconsultants, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone that they control. Consultant’s duty to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Indemnified Parties, shall not include any Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. (b) INDEMNIFICATION FROM SUB-CONSULTANTS. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every subconsultant, subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set

Page 11 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 660 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 9
forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement and this section.

SECTION 17. INSURANCE.

Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the Term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Addendum “1” “Insurance” and made a part of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content.

These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Consultant agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.

SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.

The expertise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this Agreement.

City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Consultant shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City, which may be given in the sole and absolute discretion of the City Manager. Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” City acknowledges, however, that Consultant, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subconsultants.

If in the performance of its duties Consultant utilizes subconsultants or subcontractors, Consultant covenants that subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making subconsultants or subcontractors subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement, including without limitation, the insurance obligations set forth in Section 17 “Insurance.” The Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the City is an intended beneficiary of any work performedby any subconsultant or subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between any subconsultant or subcontractor and the City.

SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.

Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors / subconsultants, if any, assigned to perform the Services.

Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors / subconsultants, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.

SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving written notice of termination to Consultant. In the event such notice is given, Consultant shall cease immediately all work in progress.
(b) Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City.

Page 12 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 661 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 10
(c) If either Consultant or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Consultant, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice.
(d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Consultant or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Consultant’s possession shall be returned to City. Consultant shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Consultant, prepared as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. (e) Upon written notice, City may suspend all or any portion of Consultant’s performance under this Agreement at its sole option and for its convenience for a reasonable period of time not to exceed six (6) months. City will pay to Consultant a sum equivalent to the reasonable value of the services satisfactorily provided up to the date of suspension. City may rescind the suspension prior to or at six (6) months by providing Consultant with written notice of the rescission, at which time Consultant would be required to resume performance in compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. Consultant will be entitled to an extension of time to complete performance under this Agreement equal to the length of the suspension unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Parties.

SECTION 21. DEFAULT.

In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default.

This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended or reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.

Consultant shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.

Page 13 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 662 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 11
SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.

All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.

SECTION 24. NOTICES.

All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by telecopier or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To City: City of Indio
Attn: City Manager
100 Civic Center Mall
Indio, CA 92201
To Consultant: Dudek
Attn: Legal Department
605 Third Street
Encinitas, CA 92024
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.

SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.

The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant represents and warrants that he/she/they has/have the authority to so execute this Agreement and to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.

This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 “Amendment” and the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Indio Municipal Code.

SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.

This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

Page 14 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 663 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 12
SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.

No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if the total compensation under this Agreement, as amended, would not exceed the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Indio Municipal Code. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

SECTION 29. WAIVER.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

SECTION 31. ATTORNEY’S FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.

In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits and Addendums, along with any amendments thereto, is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Consultant and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.

SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.

If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).

Page 15 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 664 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Page | 13
SECTION 34. INCORPORATION AND CONFLICTING TERMS.
(a) The following documents are incorporated and made part of this Agreement by this reference:

1. Insurance requirements (“Addendum 1”)

2. All Exhibits and Addendums

3. All amendments

4. Consultant’s proposal, if any

5. Any laws, regulations, requirements, or restrictions, applicable to the funding source used by City to pay Consultant for any portion of work done under Agreement (“Funding Restrictions”)
(b) The documents listed above shall be referred to collectively as the “Agreement Documents.” The Agreement Documents are intended to be complementary, and a requirement in one Document is effective as if it appeared in all the Documents. In the event of a conflict between any of the Agreement Documents, the Documents shall be given effect in the following order: Funding Restrictions, Amendments (most recent first), this Agreement, Insurance requirements, Exhibits and Addendums, and Consultant’s proposal. Where the requirements of one Document are more stringent then another the more stringent shall govern.

SECTION 35. TIME OF ESSENCE.

Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

SECTION 36. FEDERAL FUNDS.

In the event the Services are funded either in whole or in part by a federal grant, Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Addendum “2” “Federal Funds.” [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

Page 16 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 665 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Signature Page

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT

FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SIXTH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF INDIO AND DUDEK
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY OF INDIO
___________________________
Bryan H. Montgomery
City Manager
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK
By: ___________________________
Sabdi Sanchez, CMC
City Clerk Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY
By: ____________________________

CONSULTANT
By:

Joseph Monaco
President and CEO

Page 17 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 666 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Page | 1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Page 18 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 667 of 1671 Housing Element Implementation On-Call Services 1
Scope of Services
Project Understanding
Based on our conversations with City staff, knowledge of the adopted Housing Element, and current Housing Element implementation work with the City, Dudek has in-depth understanding of the subsequent steps that need to be taken for timely Housing Element implementation. Dudek is prepared to work in coordination with the City to assist in meeting measurable objectives, as identified in the Housing Element. Our team has worked to identify programs of the Housing Element with timelines in 2024-2025. We anticipate that the implementation of the Housing Element will be an iterative process and our team will work collaboratively with City staff to fulfill the scope of services. Implementation of such programs will assist the City in meeting the objectives and overarching goals of the Housing Element, while demonstrating its support for housing to the State.

Task 1: Project Management & Administration
Dudek’s project manager will oversee the day-to-day project management tasks so that this project stays on schedule and within budget and serve as the primary point of contact. Dudek will conduct a project kickoff meeting following the Notice to Proceed with client staff. The kickoff meeting will have multiple purposes:
 Confirm project expectations and goals.
 Establish roles, responsibilities, and chain of communication protocols.  Discuss the scope of work, deliverables, schedule, and milestones.

Following the kickoff meeting, the Dudek team will facilitate monthly virtual meetings to review work conducted, plan for upcoming tasks and milestones, and ensure that the project remains on time and within budget. Dudek anticipates a total of 16 one-hour monthly meetings. Any meetings thereafter can be offered at Dudek staff’s hourly rate of compensation, as needed.

Task 1 Deliverables
 One (1) kickoff meeting, facilitation, and meeting minutes.  Critical path schedule identifying responsible staff.  Up to 16 one-hour monthly team meetings.

Task 2: On-Call Housing Element Implementation Assistance Dudek has identified eight programs of the City’s Housing Element that the Dudek team can assist the City with objectives that target implementation within the 2024-2025 fiscal year. Below is a program-by-program breakdown of the work Dudek can provide within the allocated budget. Dudek anticipates the work will be conducted over the course of 12 months following the Notice to Proceed.

PROGRAM 1 ACCESSIBILITY
The Dudek team will assist the City with the implementation of Program 1 of the Housing Element which aims to increase accessibility in housing through incentives and resources. Dudek will develop a procedure for providing incentives in exchange for increased accessibility in housing. This could include a reduction in development standards, increased density or square footage, or other regulatory incentives, as determined with City staff. Based on final direction from the

Page 19 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 668 of 1671 Housing Element Implementation On-Call Services 2
City, Dudek will prepare a draft Accessibility Incentive Program, followed by a final Accessibility Incentive Program, either through a new ordinance or the inclusion of new incentives within an existing ordinance. Our team will also develop accessibility resources for developers and residents, such as a checklist of universal design features that can be made available on the City’s housing resources webpage. In addition, Dudek will attend one virtual public meeting or hearing, and assist in the preparation of exhibits, including staff report review, and presentation to City Council.

Program 1 Deliverables
 One (1) Draft Accessibility Incentive Program.
 One (1) Final Accessibility Incentive Program.
 One (1) Checklist of Accessibility Features, or similar resource.  Dudek staff will provide support for one (1) City Council meeting or hearing (including staff report review, presentation materials, and virtual attendance and facilitation, as requested).

Program 1 Assumptions
 Dudek assumes revisions and comments on drafts will be consolidated and will include up to (2) rounds of review and revisions.

PROGRAM 7 BY-RIGHT DEVELOPMENT
The Dudek team will assist the City in the implementation of Program 7 by developing technical assistance pertaining to legislative requirements for sites identified in the City’s sites inventory that qualify for by-right development. This will include an interactive database of qualifying sites that may be used by City staff or interested developers and property owners. Our team will develop a database that can be integrated with the City’s existing records, such as a geospatial file to be integrated into the City’s interactive mapping platform.

Program 7 Deliverables
 One (1) interactive database including qualifying sites identified in previous Housing Elements pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(i).

PROGRAM 9 DENSITY BONUS
In accordance with Program 9 of the Housing Element, the City’s current Density Bonus ordinance needs to be updated for consistency with the latest state legislative requirements. Dudek will incorporate edits to the Density Bonus ordinance in accordance with the diagnostic memo of recommended changes prepared during Phase I of the implementation work in coordination with City staff. Dudek will also assist in the preparation of exhibits and materials, including staff report review, as needed for one virtual City Council hearing.

Program 9 Deliverables
 Strikeout/Underline of Density Bonus ordinance.
 City Council hearing support through preparation of exhibits, including staff report review, for one (1) public hearing, or meeting.

PROGRAM 11 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STREAMLINING
Program 11 of the Housing Element aims to increase awareness of existing housing development opportunities in the City and facilitate development through regulatory and financial incentives. The Dudek team will develop a database to assist housing developers and property owners in identifying key housing opportunities. The database will be provided through an interactive format, such as a map that is readily integrated into the City’s interactive mapping platform through

Page 20 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 669 of 1671 Housing Element Implementation On-Call Services 3
a geospatial file. The database will provide information available for housing development opportunities by highlighting sites from the Sites Inventory and key sites identified for lot consolidation opportunities. The Dudek team will also develop a draft memo identifying lot consolidation incentive best practices and propose two to three alternative programs. In collaboration with the City, the Dudek team will narrow down a preferred alternative and provide key steps needed for the City to implement the program.

Program 11 Deliverables
 One (1) interactive database and associated file of opportunity housing sites in the City, including sites identified in the Sites Inventory and key sites identified for lot consolidation opportunities.  One (1) draft memo with up to three (3) lot consolidation alternative programs.  One (1) final memo detailing next steps for the City’s final implementation of the preferred lot consolidation incentive alternative.

PROGRAM 15 EXTERNAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
Program 15 of the Housing Element recognizes how funding sources from State and Federal programs play a critical role in supporting housing development. The program’s objectives aim to secure outside funding that may be used for housing, and support and adopt policies and programs that position the City as a competitive applicant for such funding opportunities, such as competitive State funding grant programs in the areas of housing, transportation, infrastructure, and land use. Dudek will assist the City by completing the State’s Prohousing Designation Program’s application as authorized by Resolution No. 10401, including required supporting documentation in coordination with City staff. Dudek will package all documents and submit the completed application on behalf of the City to HCD. HCD’s 60-day application review process is iterative and relies on the context and needs of each jurisdiction. Dudek will work closely with HCD and City staff to incorporate up to two (2) rounds of revisions to the application during the 60-day review period. Dudek assumes revisions to the application will only be made in direct response to comments received by HCD.

Program 15 Deliverables
 One (1) electronic copy of the completed and self-scored Prohousing Designation Program application and supporting documentation sent to HCD.

Task 7.2 Assumptions
 Up to two (2) one-hour meetings with HCD staff and City staff following submission of the application to HCD.
 Up to two (2) rounds of review and revisions to the application within HCD’s 60-day review period.

PROGRAM 21 LOCAL HOUSING TRUST FUND
Through Program 21 of the Housing Element, the City has committed to explore the establishment of a Local Housing Trust Fund. A housing trust is one approach to address housing challenges related to supply and affordability aimed at raising funds for affordable housing production, preservation, and rehabilitation, and support for other housing programs.

To implement this program Dudek will develop a White Paper on Housing Trust Funds, or similar funding mechanism to support affordable housing in Indio, that will detail housing trust structures, including different operational structures that could be utilized in establishing a Housing Trust, potential funding sources to support a new trust, short case studies on existing housing trusts in Southern California, and recommendations.

Program 21 Deliverables
 One (1) Draft Housing Trust Fund White Paper.
 One (1) Final Housing Trust Fund White Paper.

Page 21 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 670 of 1671 Housing Element Implementation On-Call Services 4
Program 21 Assumptions
 Dudek assumes one round of review for each draft and that revisions and comments on drafts will be consolidated and minimal.

PROGRAM 24 NO NET LOSS
Through Program 24, the City has committed to amend staff procedures to track capacity identified for sites in the Sites Inventory to ensure compliance with No-Net-Loss legislation. To assist City staff and applicants in verifying development applications and tracking no-net-loss, the Dudek team will develop a database that identifies the number of units and affordability assumptions made for individual sites identified in the Sites Inventory.

Dudek will continue working with the City in preparing an internal tracking sheet to be used by City staff when approving development projects on sites identified in the Sites Inventory; However, to facilitate the process for City staff and streamline no-net-loss tracking procedures, Dudek will develop an actualized, interactive database, such as a parcel level map that can be readily integrated into the City’s interactive mapping platform, to verify capacity of sites against the capacity identified in the Sites Inventory. This database will be developed in combination with implementation of Program 11, identifying lot consolidation opportunities.

Program 24 Deliverables
 One interactive database and associated file for no-net-loss tracking and integration with the City’s interactive mapping platform.

PROGRAM 28 REASONABLE ACCOMODATIONS PROCEDURE
To implement Program 28 of the Housing Element, Dudek will develop a reasonable accommodations application as well as an informational bulletin to ensure that project applicants are aware of the flexibility provided through the City’s regulations for reasonable accommodations in Section 6.04.07 of the Unified Development Code. Implementation of Program 28 may be informed by the implementation of Program 1, further enhancing opportunities for increased accessibility in housing developments.

Program 28 Deliverables
 One (1) Draft Informational bulletin and Application.  One (1) Final Informational bulletin and Application.

Program 28 Assumptions
 Dudek assumes revisions and comments on drafts will be consolidated and minimal.

PROGRAM 29 REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Program 30 ensures that appropriate parking reductions apply to any development proposals that would eliminate religious-use parking spaces in exchange for housing developments in accordance with State law. Dudek will assist the City with needed revisions through an analysis of the currently adopted regulations, as compared to state requirements detailed in Assembly Bill 1851 (2020).

Program 29 Deliverables
 Diagnostic of existing ordinance and recommended changes.

Page 22 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 671 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Exhibit B – Compensation
Page | 1
EXHIBIT “B”

COMPENSATION

Page 23 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 672 of 1671 Housing Element Implementation On-Call
City of Indio
Housing Element Implementation On-Call - Deliverables

DUDEK FEE ESTIMATE
6/22/2024
Project Team Role: Specialist IV Specialist V Specialist II Creative Services
IV Analyst II
Senior Specialist
III
Team Member: Erika Van Sickel
Elizabeth
Dickson Janet Rodriguez Raoul Ranoa Joshua Baehr GIS Analyst Billable Rate: $185.00 $210.00 $165.00 $175.00 $115.00 $235.00 Task 1 Project Management (Deliverables Only)
Meetings and Program Management 40 16 8 64 $12,080.00
Subtotal Task 1 40 16 8 64 $12,080.00
Task 2 Program Implementation
Program 1 Accesibility

1.1 Deliverables 12 40 16 8 14 90 $16,270.00
Subtotal Task 2 12 40 16 8 14 90 $16,270.00
Program 7 By-Right Development

7.1 Deliverables 16 24 40 $6,920.00
Subtotal Task 2 16 24 40 $6,920.00
Program 9 Density Bonus

9.1 Deliverables 10 16 8 34 $5,410.00
Subtotal Task 3 10 16 8 34 $5,410.00
Program 11 Development Incentives and Programs

11.1 Deliverables 24 8 32 4 6 4 78 $13,730.00
Subtotal Task 4 24 8 32 4 6 4 78 $13,730.00
Program 15 External Funding Opportunities

15.1 Deliverables 36 22 14 2 74 $12,970.00
Subtotal Task 9 36 22 14 2 74 $12,970.00
Program 21 Local Housing Trust Fund

21.1 Deliverables 12 30 4 10 31 87 $14,495.00
Subtotal Task 12 12 30 4 10 31 87 $14,495.00
Program 24 No Net Loss

24.1 Deliverables 14 16 4 34 $5,930.00
Subtotal Task 17 14 16 4 34 $5,930.00
Program 28 Reasonable Accommodation Procedures

28.1 Deliverables 16 8 8 32 $5,680.00
Subtotal Task 24 16 8 8 32 $5,680.00
Program 29 Reduced Parking Requirements

29.1 Deliverables 4 12 3 24 43 $6,515.00
Subtotal Task 30 4 12 3 24 43 $6,515.00
Total Hours 168 122 141 48 93 4 486
Total $31,080.00 $25,620.00 $23,265.00 $8,400.00 $10,695.00 $940.00 486 $100,000.00 Percent of Hours (Base) 35% 25% 29% 10% 19% 1%
Dudek Labor Hours and Rates
TOTAL
DUDEK
HOURS

DUDEK LABOR
COSTS
A-1

Page 24 of 28 ends

IND-PSA rev20221214
Addendum 1 - Insurance
Page | 1
ADDENDUM “1”

INSURANCE
(A)INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by Consultant, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:

1. MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE. Consultant shall maintain the following types and limits of insurance.

2. MINIMUM LIMITS OF INSURANCE.

GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (ERRORS & OMISSIONS) INSURANCE. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000 per accident or disease). Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

UMBRELLA OR EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE. [Optional depending on limits required]. As an option to meet the limits of insurance required by this Agreement, Consultant may obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with limits that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary

Page 25 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 674 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Addendum 1 - Insurance
Page | 2
coverages set forth above, including commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop-down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason;
• Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; • Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; • Policies shall “follow form” to the underlying primary policies; and • Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.
(B) OTHER PROVISIONS. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City. (C) OTHER REQUIREMENTS. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

1. Upon request from the City, Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides.

2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.

3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant’s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.

4. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be

Page 26 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 675 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Addendum 1 - Insurance
Page | 3
endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

5. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.

6. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.

Page 27 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 676 of 1671 IND-PSA rev20221214
Addendum 2 – Federal Funds
Page | 1
ADDENDUM “2"

FEDERAL FUNDS

Page 28 of 28 ends

Award of Professional Services Agreement to Dudek in the not-to-exceed a... Page 677 of 1671 City of Indio
City Council
July 17, 2024

STAFF REPORT
To: City Council
From: Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager
Prepared by: Timothy Wassil, Public Works Director
Subject: Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 2024/25 and Ordering the Residential Annual Solid Waste Charge to Be Collected on the County of Riverside Tax Roll
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 2024/25 and Ordering the Residential Annual Solid Waste Charges to Be Collected on the County of Riverside Tax Roll.

SUMMARY:

On June 15, 2022, the City of Indio and Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC, entered into a Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste Collection Services. The Franchise Agreement specifies annual increases to the residential waste rates through July 1, 2024. The rates also include changes to the Producer Price Index (PPI) and disposal costs. On July 1, 2023, the proposed residential rates increased to $24.97 per month for curb service collected on the tax roll and commercial rates increased to $143.95 per month for a 3-yard bin picked up once a week.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

On June 15, 2022, the City of Indio and Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC, (Burrtec) entered into a Franchise Agreement for Solid Waste Collection Services. The Franchise Agreement (Agreement) was renegotiated in large part to meet new State Mandates for SB1383. SB1383 is a vast waste regulation with requirements that include organics services and increases oversight, monitoring and reporting.

The Agreement specifies annual increases to the residential waste rates through July 1, 2024. In accordance with the Agreement, Burrtec has requested a rate adjustment reflecting the residential rate increase. In addition, adjustments reflecting increases in the Producer Price Index (PPI) up to 5 percent and disposal cost increases are also included. This year the PPI did not increase, however, disposal costs increased. The proposed residential rates increased by $2.01 to $24.97 per month for curb service collected on the tax roll and commercial rates increased to $143.95 per month for a 3-yard bin picked up once a week. Notices of the increase were mailed per legal requirements.

For residential customers, pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 6 of Part 3 of Division 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 5470 (the “Code”), the City Council is authorized to levy an annual solid waste charge and to have such charge collected on the tax roll in the same AGENDA ITEM #8.18
Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 20... Page 678 of 1671 manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY:

Current FY Financial
Impact:
$0 In current year budget: N/A
Current FY General
Fund Impact:
$0 Budget adjustment: N/A
Next FY Financial
Impact:
$0 Strategic Objective:

Source of funds: N/A Fund-Org-Object
Reference:

N/A
Additional Financial Details:

There is no financial impact associated with the adoption of the Resolution levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 2024/25 and ordering the annual solid waste charge to be collected on the County of Riverside tax roll.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attchment 1 - Resolution 10456 Solid Waste Charge FY 24-25 Attachment 2 - Proposed Rates
APPROVAL(S):

Timothy Wassil, Public Works Director Approved - 10 Jul 2024 Jennifer A. Mizrahi, Assistant City Attorney Approved - 11 Jul 2024 Ruby D. Walla, Director of Finance Approved - 11 Jul 2024 Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager Approved - 11 Jul 2024

Page 2 of 15 ends

Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 20... Page 679 of 1671 ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 10456
SOLID WASTE CHARGE FOR FY 2024/25

Page 3 of 15 ends

Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 20... Page 680 of 1671 1 RESOLUTION NO. 10456

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO

LEVYING THE ANNUAL SOLID WASTE CHARGE FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2024/25 AND ORDERING THE ANNUAL SOLID WASTE

CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS TO BE

COLLECTED ON THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX ROLL

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIO DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds:

A. Pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 6 of Part 3 of Division 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 5470 (the “Code”), the City Council is authorized to levy an annual solid waste charge (the “Charge”) and to have such Charge collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City.

B. The City Council has caused a written report (the “Written Report”) to be prepared and filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 5473. The Written Report contains a description of each parcel of real property within the City to which the Charge is applicable and for which the City intends to collect the Charge on the tax roll (the “Identified Parcels”) and the amount of the Charge for each such Identified Parcel for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

C. Following notice duly given in accordance with law, the City Council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the Written Report and the levy and collection of the Charge for Fiscal Year 2024/25 and heard and considered all objections and protests thereto.

Section 2. The City Council hereby overrules all protests and objections to the Written Report and approves the Written Report as filed.

Section 3. The City Council hereby levies the Charge for Fiscal Year 2024/25 in the amount set forth in the Written Report.

Section 4. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the Charge against the Identified Parcels for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2026.

Section 5. The Charge shall be collected for Fiscal Year 2024/25 on the County of Riverside tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City.

Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the Written Report with the City Treasurer with a statement endorsed on said Written Report over the City Clerk’s signature that the Written Report has been approved and finally

Page 4 of 15 ends

Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 20... Page 681 of 1671 adopted by the City Council. Upon receipt of the Written Report from the City Clerk, the City Treasurer shall enter the amount of the Charge against the Identified Parcels as they appear on the current assessment roll.

Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby further authorized and directed to file with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside a copy of the Written Report, with a statement endorsed thereon over the City Clerk’s signature that the Written Report has been approved and finally adopted by the City Council, with a certified copy of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Indio City Council held on this 17
th day of July 2024 by the following vote.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
.
______________________________

LUPE RAMOS AMITH, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________

SABDI SANCHEZ, CMC

CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATOR

Page 5 of 15 ends

Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 20... Page 682 of 1671 ATTACHMENT 2

PROPOSED WASTE
RATES FY 24/25

Page 6 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
Rate Exhibit 1
Proposed Rated Effective 711124

RESIDENTIAL
DirectBiil
CurbService
Yard Service
AdditionalCart
Tax Roll
CurbService
Yard Service
AdditionalCarl
OtherResidentialFees:

NewStart
Re-Start
Special Pick Up
Service $ 12.37 $ 17.64 $ 2.15
Service $ 16.84 $ 16.84 $ 83.58
Current Rates
Dimsai
Total A8939 Total $ 10.59 $ 0.23 $28.21 $ - $ - $17.64 8 9.31 $ - $11.46 Disgosal
Total A8939 Total
$10.59 $ - $22.96 $ - $ - $17.64 $ 9.31 $ - $11.46
Disgcsal
Total A3939 Total 0 0 $16.84 0 0 $16.84 0 0 $83.58 $$$$ Service
Service
Phase-In
Organics
Service $ 1.80 $ .

Organics
Service $ 1.54
Disease!
True-U2 $ (0.51) s _ $ (0.51)
[ism
True-UQ $ (0.51) $
,3 (0.51) $
048.99%
Mswrgee $ 0.98 s . $ 0.98
Disgosal

MSW/ORG

0.98 s .0.98
A3939 $ - $ - s .

Adlustment
Total $$$

2.27 0.47
Service $ 19.19 $ 17.64 $ 2.15
Service $ 13.91 $ 17.64 $ 2.15
Service $ 16.84 $ 16.84 $ 83.58
W Mg $ 11.06 $ 0.23 $ - $ - $ 9.78 $ -
Disgosal Total A8939 $ 11.06 $ - $ - $ - $ 9.78 $ :

Dismal Total A8939 3 . . $ - - $ . .

Progosed Rates
Total
$30.48
$17.64
$11.93
Total
$24.97
$17.64
$11.93
T_ota|
$16.84
$16.84
$83.58

Page 7 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
R319611111111” Proposed Rated Effective7I1124

COMMERCIALTRASH
Current Rates Adlustment P920396Rates Freguencg queng Freguencx 201.3125 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 2211129 2 8 51.78 8 91.74 8 131.28 8 170.26 8 208.38 8 251.12 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 51.78 8 91.74 8 131.28 8 170.26 8 208.38 8 251.12 3 8 72.89 8137.87 8 197.18 8 255.42 8 312.59 8 376.91 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 7289 8 137.87 8 197.18 5 255.42 8 312.59 8 376.91 4 8 103.75 8183.65 8 263.51 8 340.55 8 416.89 8 50222 8 - 8 - 8 - s - 8 - 8 - 8 103.75 3 183.65 3 263.51 5 340.55 8 415.99 8 502.22 6 8 155.55 8 273.47 3 394.29 $ 509.81 8 625.70 6 762.62 $ - 3 - S - S - 3 - S - 8 155.55 8 273.47 8 394.29 5 509.81 $ 625.70 8 762.62 2139.29.21 2 8 41.16 8 60.87 8 121.22 8 181.54 8 201.07 8 241.74 8 1.80 8 3.54 8 5.30 8 7.06 8 8.79 8 10.57 5 42.96 8 84.51 8 128.52 8 168.60 8 209.88 8 252.31 3 8 61.73 8121.87 8 182.01 8 241.98 8 301.85 8 362.36 8 2.70 8 5.33 8 7.88 8 10.58 8 13.20 8 15.85 9 64.43 8 127.20 8 189.97 8 252.57 8 315.15 8 378.21 4 8 82.27 8 162.54 6 242.82 3 822.44 8 402.77 3 483.20 8 3.60 S 7.11 8 10.62 8 14.10 8 17.61 8 21.13 3 85.87 5 169.75 8 253.44 6 336.54 3 420.38 5 504.33 6 8 123.44 8 243.73 8 364.03 8 482.34 8 603.83 8 724.83 8 5.40 8 10.68 8 15.92 8 21.09 8 26.41 8 31.70 8 128.84 8 254.39 8 379.85 8 503.43 8 630.34 8 756.53 22922 2 S 2.00 8 4.00 3 6.00 8 8.00 S 9.99 8 11.99 5 — $ - S - 3 - $ - 5 - 8 2.00 8 4.00 6 6.00 6 8.00 S 9.99 5 11.99 3 8 2.99 8 6.00 8 8.98 8 12.00 9 14.99 8 18.08 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - $ - 8 - 8 2.99 8 6.00 8 8.98 8 12.00 5 14.99 3 18-03 4 s 4.00 s 8.08 3 11.99 9 15.99 9 19.98 9 23.88 s - 8 - s - s - 8 - 8 - s 4.00 s 8.00 9 11.99 8 15.99 3 19.98 5 23-98 6 8 5.98 8 11.98 8 18.00 8 23.97 8 29.54 8 35.97 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - $ - 8 5.98 8 11.99 8 18.00 8 23.97 8 29.54 5 35.97 mm 2 s 2.52 s 4.68 s 6.85 s 9.00 9 11.10 s 13.3? s - s - s - s - s - s - s 2.52 s 4.99 s 6.85 8 9.00 S 11.10 5 13.37 3 8 3.64 8 7.04 8 10.28 8 13.48 8 16.66 8 20.04 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - S - 8 3.64 8 7.04 8 10.28 8 13.48 8 18.66 8 20.04 4 8 5.03 8 9.38 8 13.72 8 17.98 8 22.23 8 26.72 8 - 8 - s - 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 5.03 8 9.38 8 13.72 8 17.88 8 22.23 8 26.72 6 7.55 14.01 20.55 28.80 33.33 40.33 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 - $ - 8 - 8 7.55 8 14.01 8 20.55 8 26.90 8 33.33 8 40.33 2 8 97.46 s 181.39 8 265.35 8 348.80 8 430.54 8 518.22 8 1.80 8 3.54 8 530 s 7.06 8 6.79 8 10.57 8 69.26 8 184.93 8 270.65 8 355.86 8 439.33 8 528.79 3 3 141.25 5 272.78 3 398.45 5 522.89 8 646.19 6 777.37 S 2.70 $ 5.33 S 7.96 6 10.58 $ 13.20 6 15.85 6 143.95 6 278.11 8 405.41 8 533.47 6 859.39 8 793.22 4 8 195.05 3 383.67 8 582.04 8 698.98 8 861.87 81,036.12 8 3.60 8 7.11 8 10.82 9 14.10 8 17.61 9 21.13 8 198.85 8 370.78 8 542.867 8 711.06 8 878.48 8 1,057.25 6 8 292.52 8 543.20 8 796.87 $1,043.02 8 1.29250 81,553.75 8 5.40 8 10.66 8 15.92 5 21.09 8 25.41 8 31.70 8 297.92 8 55388 8 812.79 81,084.11 8 1.318.91 8 1,595.45 rc ecclathes:

Service Dispgsal Total Service Disgosal Totai Service 0133831 “1.8.1 De?vaerharge 8 29.17 S - 3 29.17 S - 5 - 8 - 8 29.17 8 - 5 29.17 NewSlatt 8 17.29 8 - 8 17.29 8 - s - s - 8 17.29 8 - 8 17.29 129512311 8 17.29 s - 3 17.29 8 - 8 - 3 - 9 17.29 s - 8 17.29 P01001208 8 47.70 8 - 8 47.70 8 - 8 - 8 - 8 47.70 8 - 8 47.70 1.0010090011131110: 8 78.75 S - $ 78.75 $ - 3 - 8 - 6 78.75 6 - $ 78.75 Replace LockingBar 8 52.50 8 - 8 52.50 8 - 8 - S - 8 52.50 8 - 8 52.50 Saturday ServiceIMonth 8 47.70 8 - 8 47.70 s - 8 . 8 . 8 47.70 8 - 8 47.70 3Yard ConstructionBMW“ 8 84.54 8100.09 8 184.63 8 - 8 4.38 8 4.38 $ 94.54 5 104.47 5 199-01 4Yard ConstructionBinJPu? 5 95.10 8121.42 8 216.52 S - S 5.31 $ 5.31 6 95.10 5 126.73 $ 221.03 ZvdEmaEthv 8 37.54 8 9.53 8 47.07 8 - 8 0.42 8 0.42 8 37.54 8 9.95 8 47.49 3vdExtra Emptv 5 56.26 8 14.23 8 70.49 8 - 8 0.62 8 0.62 $ 56.26 5 14.85 6 71.11 4ydExtraEm01v 8 74.97 8 18.99 8 93.96 8 ~ 8 0.83 8 0.83 8 74.97 8 19.82 8 94.79 6vdExtraEthv 8 112.58 8 28.51 3 141.09 $ - S 1.25 8 1.25 8 112.58 3 29.76 6 142-34 2ydExtraEmptyCompactor(3x) 8 112.61 8 28.53 8 141.14 8 - 3 1.25 5 1.25 8 112.61 3 29.78 8 142.39 Syd ExtraEmlyCompactoer) 8 168.76 8 42.74 8 211.50 8 - 8 1.87 8 1.87 8 188.78 9 44.61 8 213.37 4116Extra EamtyCompactnr (3X) 8 224.91 8 56.94 8 281.85 3 - 8 2.49 3 2.49 8 224.91 8 59.43 8 284.34 Syd ExtraEmptvComactorth) 8 337.74 8 85.52 8 423.26 8 - 8 3.74 s 3.74 8 337.74 8 88.26 8 427.00 969Trash Loonlume 8 18.08 9.85 8 27.93 8 - 8 0.43 S 0.43 8 18.08 8 10.28 8 28.36 959W19 LowVolume 8 13.83 8 0.69 8 14.52

Page 8 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
Rate Exhibit 1
Preposed Rated Effective 7I1124
COMMERCIALTRASH Commercial Comgactor Rates
ProEosedComEactorRates
Freguencx
Bin Size 1 2 3 4 5 6
Service 2 $ 155.34 $ 275.22 $ 393.84 $ 510.78 $ 625.14 $ 753.36 3 $ 218.67 $ 413.61 $ 591.54 $ 766.26 $ 937.77 $ 1,130.73 4 $ 311.25 $ 550.95 $ 790.53 $ 1,021.65 $ 1,250.67 $ 1,506.66 6 $ 466.65 $ 820.41 $ 1,182.87 $ 1,529.43 $ 1,877.10 $ 2,287.86 Disgosal 2 $ 128.88 $ 253.53 $ 379.56 $ 505.80 $ 629.58 $ 756.93 3 $ 193.29 $ 381.60 $ 569.91 $ 757.71 $ 945.45 $ 1,134.63 4 $ 257.61 $ 509.25 $ 760.32 $ 1,009.62 $ 1,261.14 $ 1,512.99 6 $ 386.52 $ 763.17 $ 1,139.85 $ 1,510.29 $ 1,891.02 $ 2,269.59 AB939 2 $ 6.00 $ 12.00 $ 18.00 $ 24.00 $ 29.97 $ 35.97 3 $ 8.97 $ 18.00 $ 26.94 $ 36.00 $ 44.97 $ 54.18 4 $ 12.00 $ 24.00 $ 35.97 $ 47.97 $ 59.94 $ 71.94 6 $ 17.94 $ 35.97 $ 54.00 $ 71.91 $ 88.62 $ 107.91 831383 Adjustment 2 $ 7.56 $ 14.04 $ 20.55 $ 27.00 $ 33.30 $ 40.1 1 3 $ 10.92 $ 21.12 $ 30.84 $ 40.44 $ 49.98 $ 60.12 4 $ 15.09 $ 28.14 $ 41.16 $ 53.94 $ 66.69 $ 80.16 6 $ 22.65 $ 42.03 $ 61.65 $ 80.70 $ 99.99 $ 120.99 Total 2 $ 297.78 $ 554.79 $ 811.95 $ 1,067.58 $ 1,317.99 $ 1,586.37 3 $ 431.85 $ 834.33 $ 1,219.23 $ 1,600.41 $ 1,978.17 $ 2,379.66 4 $ 595.95 $ 1,112.34 $ 1,627.98 $ 2,133.18 $ 2,638.44 $ 3,171.75 6 $ 893.76 $ 1.661.58 $ 2,438.37 $ 3,192.33 $ 3,956.73 $ 4,786.35

Page 9 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
Rate Exhibit 1
ProposedRated Effective 7I1I24

COMMERCIAL - TEMPORARY BINS
Current Rates
Standard Extra Empty
Service
BinSize 3 $99.60 4 $109.41
Disgosal
Bin Size 3 $103.44 4 $1 12.29
Total
BinSize 3 $199.11 4 $217.54 7 day rental and 1 dump included Other Commercial Temporary Bin Charges:

Extra Trip Charge
Per Diem Over 7 Days
$48.24
$26.70
$99.60
$109.41
$103.44
$112.29
$199.12
$217.54
Adiustment
Standard Extra Empty
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$4.52 $4.52
$4.91 $4.91
$4.52 $4.52
$4.91 $4.91
$0.00
$0.00
$99.60
$109.41
$107.96
$117.20
$207.56
$226.61
$48.24
$26.70
Progosed Rates w
$99.60
$109.41
$107.96
$117.20
$207.56
$226.61

Page 10 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
Rate Exhibit 1
Proposed Rated Effective 711I24 W
Current Rates Progosed Rates
89% Freguencx Frequency 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
BinSize 2 $ 29.22 $ 58.45 $ 87.67 $ 116.91 8 [146.15 $ 175.37 $ 29.22 $ 58.45 $ 87.67 $ 116.91 $ 146.15 $ 175.37 3 $ 43.84 $ 87.67 9 131.54 $ 175.36 $ 219.22 $ 262.97 $ 43.84 $ 87.67 $ 131.54 $ 175.36 $ 219.22 $ 262.97 4 $ 58.45 $ 116.92 6 175.37 $ 233.82 $ 292.31 $ 350.76 $ 58.45 $ 116.92 $ 175.37 $ 233.82 $ 292.31 $ 350.76 6 $ 87.69 8 175.37 9 263.03 $ 350.77 $ 438.97 6 526.12 $ 87.69 $ 175.37 $ 263.03 $ 350.77 $ 438.97 $ 526.12 6yd Comp 3 131.79 $ 263.61 5 395.38 $ 527.19 $ 658.99 8 790.79 $ 131.79 $ 263.61 $ 395.38 $ 527.19 $ 658.99 $ 790.79 A3939 2 $ 2.00 $ 4.00 $ 6.00 $ 8.00 $ 9.99 $ 11.99 $ 2.00 $ 4.00 $ 6.00 $ 8.00 $ 9.99 $ 11.99 3 $ 2.99 $ 6.00 $ 8.98 $ 12.00 $ 14.99 $ 18.06 $ 2.99 $ 6.00 $ 8.98 $ 12.00 $ 14.99 $ 18.06 4 $ 4.00 $ 8.00 8 11.99 $ 15.99 $ 19.98 $ 23.98 $ 4.00 $ 8.00 $ 11.99 $ 15.99 3 19.98 $ 23.98 6 $ 5.98 $ 11.99 $ 18.00 $ 23.97 $ 29.54 $ 35.97 $ 5.98 $ 11.99 $ 18.00 $ 23.97 6 29.54 $ 35.97 6yd Comp 8 8.98 $ 17.96 $ 28.94 $ 35.92 $ 44.90 $ 53.86 $ 8.98 $ 17.96 $ 26.94 $ 35.92 $ 44.90 $ 53.88 631383 Adiustment 2 $ 7.49 $ 14.97 $ 22.45 $ 29.94 $ 37.42 $ 44.91 $ 7.49 $ 14.97 $ 22.45 $ 29.94 $ 37.42 $ 44.91 3 $ 11.22 $ 22.45 $ 33.67 $ 44.91 $ 56.13 $ 67.36 $ 11.22 $ 22.45 $ 33.67 $ 44.91 $ 56.13 $ 67.36 4 $ 14.97 $ 29.94 8 44.91 $ 59.87 $ 74.84 $ 89.81 $ 14.97 $ 29.94 $ 44.91 $ 59.87 $ 74.84 $ 89.81 6 22.45 44.91 67.36 89.81 112.28 134.72 $ 22.45 $ 44.91 $ 67.36 $ 89.81 $ 112.28 $ 134.72 Total 2 $ 38.71 $ 77.42 $ 116.12 $ 154.85 $ 193.56 $ 232.27 $ 38.71 $ 77.42 $ 116.12 $ 154.85 $ 193.56 $ 232.27 3 $ 58.05 $ 116.12 $ 174.19 $ 232.27 $ 290.34 $ 348.39 $ 58.05 $ 116.12 $ 174.19 $ 232.27 $ 290.34 $ 348.39 4 9 77.42 $ 154.86 $ 232.27 $ 309.68 $ 387.13 $ 464.55 $ 77.42 $ 154.86 $ 232.27 $ 309.68 $ 387.13 8 464.55 6 $ 116.12 $ 232.27 $ 348.39 $ 464.55 $ 580.79 $ 696.81 $ 116.12 $ 232.27 $ 348.39 8 464.55 $ 580.79 $ 696.81 6yd Comp 8 140.77 $ 281.57 $ 422.32 $ 563.11 $ 703.89 $ 844.67 $ 140.77 $ 281.57 $ 422.32 $ 563.11 $ 703.89 $ 844.67 Proposed Proposed
Other Commercial Recycle Fees: Unit Unit
Rate __I?_[ Rate
DeliveryCharge
W 8 - $ 26.29
New Start 8 15.59 $ - $ 15.59
Re Start 5 15.59 $ - $ 15.59
Pullout 20ft $ 42.99 $ - $ 42.99
LockingContainer 3 70.96 $ - $ 70-96
Replace LockingBar 3 47.31 $ - $ 47.31
Saturday Service/Month $ 42.99 $ - $ 42.99
2yd ExtraEmpty $ 27.22 $ - $ 2722
3yd ExtraEmpty $ 43.09 $ - $ 43.09 M ExtraEmpty $ 54.47 $ - $ 54.47 6yd Extra Empty $ 81.70 $ - $ 81.70
6yd compactor - extra emplylcontaminatlon 3 146.64 $ - $ 146.64

Page 11 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
Rate Exhibit 1
Pro osed Ra ed
E ve 7I‘ll24
Roll O?Trash
Current
Pull Monthly
Rate FlatRate
20 Yard $ 201.00 $ 804.00
30 Yard $ 201.00 $ 804.00
40 Yard $ 232.28 $ 929.05
PLUS DUMPFEES AT ACTUALCOST 1- 10%
Adlustment Adlustment
&A8939 SURCHARGE$ 4.60 PER TON and 11.5% Franchise Fee
Compactor rates are three tlmes (3X)the above rates
Pull
Rate
20130Yard Compactor $ 603.03
40 Yard Compactor $ 696.84
Other Roll-off Fees:

Delivery Charge $ 29.17
Relocate $ 69.63
Extra Trip $ 69.63
New Start $ 17.29
Re-Start $ 17.29
Pull Monthly
Rate Flat Rate 3 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Adiustment 5 - $ _
Adjustment 5 . s - s - s _ $ .
7l1!2024
Progosed
Pull Monthly
Rate Flat Rate $ 201.00 $ 804.00 $ 201.00 $ 804.00 $ 232.28 $ 929.05 Pull
Rate $ 603.03 $ 696.84

29.17 69.63

69.63 17.29

17.29

Page 12 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
Rate Exhibit 1
Proposed Rated Effective 711I24
RollOffTemgorau
Current Rates
Disgsal TieFee
Disposal Tip Fee/ton $ 73.09
Admin10% $ 7.31
A8939 6 4.60
FranchiseFee 11.5% $ 9.50
Total Disposal Per Ton $ 94.50
(4 tons)
Container Size Service Disgosal Total
20 YARDwith4 tons $ 466.61 $ 376.01 $ 644.62
30 YARDwith4 ions 6 466.61 $ 378.01 $ 644.62
40 YARDwith 4 ions 6 592.67 $ 376.01 $ 970.68
RATE INCLUDES7 DAYRENTALANDONEDUMPOFUP TO4 TONS.

TONSOVER4 TONS.DUMPFEES AT ACTUAL+ 10%. plus
A8939SURCHARGE$4.60 PERTON, and FranchiseFee
OTHERTEMPORARYRQLL—OFFFEES:

Service Disgosal Total
PER DIEMOVER7 DAYS $40.03 $40.03
RELOCATE $69.51 $69.51
EXTRATRIP $69.51 $69.51
PUMP(CONCRETE WASHOUT) $132.95 $132.95
Rate Adiustment $ 3.86 $ 0.39 $
43—31% =
(4 tons)
mm.9_i§m $$$ $ 19.00 $ $ 19.00 $ $ 19.00 $
Service , Dismal
Tota

19.00 19.00

19.00 1931'
Pro osed Rates 3 76.95 $ 7.70 3 4.60 $ 10.00 $ 99.25
(4 tons)
m 2mg 1.0.61
$466.61 $397.01 $863.62
$466.61 $397.01 $863.62
$592.67 $397.01 $989.68
Service Disgosal Total
$40.03 $40.03
$69.51 $69.51
$69.51 $69.51
$132.95 $132.95

Page 13 of 15 ends

CITYOF INDIO
Rate Exhibit 1
Proposed Rated Effective 111124

ROLLOFF RECYC
7mzoz4
CUI’fellt Adlugmeng to 6

FULL PULL

RATE RATE
20 YARD $206.22 $ - $ 206.22
30 YARD $206.22 $ - $ 208.22
40 YARD $238.32 $ ‘ $ 238.32

PLUS DUMP FEES AT ACTUALANDFRANCHISEFEES
OTHER ROLL-OFFRECYCLINGFEES:

DELIVERYCHARGE $29.93 $ - $ 29.93
RELOCATE $71 .43 $ - $ 71.43
.- EXTRATRIP $71.43 $ - $ 71.43
NEWSTART $17.75 $ - $ 17.75
RE-START $17.75 $ - $ 17.75

Page 14 of 15 ends

CITYOF lNDlO
Rate Exhibit 1
Proposed Rated Effective 7I1I24
COMMERCIALFOODWASTE Current Rates Adjustment MESH!Rates 1-64GallonCg};
Recycling Total Recycl lng Total Recycling Tomi # Pick-Ups Collection Material Franchlse AB-939 Monthly Collection Material Franchise monthly Collection Material Franchise AB-939 Monthly Per week ComeonentProcessing Fee Fee Rate Comgonent Processlng Fee Rate Com?nent Processlng Fee Fee Rate 1 $34.26 $39.53 $9.59 $2.00 $85.38 $0.00 $2.17 $0.28 $2.45 $34.26 $41.70 $9.87 $2.00 $87.83 2 $68.52 $79.01 $19.17 $4.00 $170.70 $0.00 $4.34 $0.56 $4.90 $68.52 $83.35 $19.73 $4.00 $175.60 3 $102.77 . $118.53 $28.76 $6.00 $256.06 $0.00 $6.51 $0.84 $7.35 $102.77 $125.04 $29.60 $6.00 $263.41 4 $137.03 $158.01 $38.34 $8.00 $341.38 $0.00 $8.68 $1.13 $9.81 $137.03 $166.69 $39.47 $8.00 $351.19 5 $171.30 $197.54 $47.93 $10.00 $426.76 $0.00 $10.85 $1.41 $12.26 $171.30 $208.39 $49.34 $10.00 $439.02 m GallonCan 1 $54.82 $79.01 $17.39 $4.00 $155.22 $0.00 $4.34 $0.56 $4.90 $54.82 $83.35 $17.95 $4.00 $160.12 2 $109.62 $158.01 $34.78 $8.00 $310.41 $0.00 $8.68 $1.13 $9.81 $109.62 $166.69 $35.91 $8.00 $320.22 3 $164.45 $237.02 $52.17 $12.00 $465.64 $0.00 $13.02 $1.69 $14.71 $164.45 $250.04 $53.86 $12.00 $480.35 4 $219.25 $316.02 $69.55 $16.00 $620.82 $0.00 $17.35 $2.25 $19.61 $219.25 $333.37 $71.81 $16.00 $640.43 5 $274.07 $395.03 $86.95 $20.00 $776.05 $0.00 $21.69 $2.81 $24.50 $274.07 $416.72 $89.76 $20.00 $800.55 WM 1 $71.94 $118.53 $24.75 $6.00 $221.22 $0.00 $6.51 $0.85 $7.36 $71.94 $125.04 $25.60 $6.00 $228.58 2 $154.16 $237.02 $50.83 $12.00 $454.01 $0.00 $13.02 $1.69 $14.71 $154.16 $250.04 $52.52 $12.00 $468.72 3 $215.83 $355.55 $74.25 $18.00 $663.62 $0.00 $19.53 $2.53 $22.06 $215.83 $375.08 $76.78 $18.00 $685.68 4 $287.76 $474.03 $98.99 $24.00 $884.78 $0.00 $26.03 $3.38 $29.41 $287.76 $500.06 $102.37 $24.00 $914.19 5 $359.72 $592.57 $123.74 $30.00 $1,106.02 $0.00 $32.54 $4.23 $36.77 $359.72 $625.11 $127.97 $30.00 $1,142.79 4- 4 G a 1 $82.22 $158.01 $31.22 $8.00 $279.45 $0.00 $8.68 $1.12 $9.80 $82.22 $166.69 $32.34 $8.00 $289.25 2 $164.44 $316.02 $62.43 $16.00 $558.89 $0.00 $17.35 $2.26 $19.61 $164.44 $333.37 $64.69 $16.00 $578.50 3 $246.66 $474.03 $93.65 $24.00 $838.34 $0.00 $26.03 $3.38 $29.41 $246.66 $500.06 $97.03 $24.00 $867.75 4 $328.89 $632.04 $124.87 $32.00 $1,117.80 $0.00 $34.71 $4.51 $39.22 $328.89 $666.75 $129.38 $32.00 $1,157.02 5 $41 1.11 $790.05 $156.08 $40.00 $1,397.24 $0.00 $43.39 $5.64 $49.03 $41 1.11 $833.44 $161 .72 $40.00 $1,446.27 Additional Cart after 4 Cans Per Week 1 $19.00 $39.53 $7.60 $1.85 $67.97 $0.00 $2.17 $0.29 $2.46 $19.00 $41.70 $7.89 $1.85 $70.43 2 $37.96 $79.01 $15.20 $3.70 $135.87 $0.00 $4.34 $0.56 $4.90 $37.96 $83.35 $15.76 $3.70 $140.77 3 $57.04 $118.53 $22.81 $5.55 $203.92 $0.00 $6.51 $0.85 $7.36 $57.04 $125.04 $23.66 $5.55 $211.28 4 $76.03 $158.01 $30.41 $7.40 $271.85 $0.00 $8.68 $1.13 $9.81 $76.03 $166.69 $31.54 $7.40 $281.66 5 $95.05 $197.54 $38.02 $9.25 $339.85 $0.00 $10.85 $1.41 $12.26 $95.05 $208.39 $39.43 $9.25 $352.11 Extra Picku 1 $11.81 $9.12 $2.72 $0.92 $24.57 $0.00 $0.50 $0.06 $0.56 $11.81 $9.62 $2.78 $0.92 $25.13 2 $21.25 $18.25 $5.13 $1.84 $46.47 $0.00 $1.00 $0.13 $1 .13 $21.25 $19.25 $5.26 $1.84 $47.60 3 $26.58 $27.37 $7.01 $2.76 $63.72 $0.00 $1.50 $0.20 $1.70 $26.58 $28.87 $7.21 $2.76 $65.42 4 $35.43 $36.49 $9.35 $3.68 $84.95 $0.00 $2.00 $0.26 $2.26 $35.43 $38.49 $9.61 $3.68 $87.21 5 $44.29 $45.62 $11.68 $4.60 $106.19 $0.00 $2.51 $0.33 $2.84 $44.29 $48.13 $12.01 $4.60 $109.03 211% $ 124.34 $ 79.01 $ 26.42 s 6.00 s 235.77 $124.34 $79.01 $26.42 $6.00 $235.77 1 $ 245.24 $ 158.01 $ 52.40 $ 12.00 s 467.65 $245.24 $158.01 $52.40 $12.00 $467.65 2 $ 490.47 $ 246.68 $ 95.79 $ 24.00 $ 856.94 $490.47 $246.68 $95.79 $24.00 $856.94 3 $ 613.09 $ 316.02 $ 120.73 $ 30.00 $ 1,079.84 $613.09 $316.02 $120.73 $30.00 $1,079.84 4 $ 735.72 $ 395.03 $ 146.93 $ 36.00 $ 1.313.68 $735.72 $395.03 $146.93 $36.00 $1.313.68 5 Page 15 of 15 AGENDA ITEM #8.18 Resolution No. 10456 levying the Annual Waste Charges for Fiscal Year 20... Page 692 of 1671 City of Indio
City Council
July 17, 2024

STAFF REPORT
To: City Council
From: Bryan H. Montgomery, City Manager
Prepared by: Timothy Wassil, Public Works Director
Subject: Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $3,371,700.35 for the Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Avenue 44 Low Water Crossing Replacement at the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel Project, Federal Project No.

BRLKS-5275(024), City Project No. BR1101
RECOMMENDATION:

Award a Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $3,371,700.35 for the Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Avenue 44 Low Water Crossing Replacement at the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel Project, Federal Project No. BRLKS-5275(024), City Project No. BR1101, and allowing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate substantive terms of the agreement including possible extensions thereto, but not including the price, and execute same, in a form as approved by the City Attorney.

SUMMARY:

On March 28, 2024, staff received six (6) proposals from qualified construction management and inspection companies for the Avenue 44 Low Water Crossing Replacement at the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel Project (Avenue 44 Bridge). After thorough proposal analysis and due diligence, staff determined that Harris & Associates, Inc. was selected as the most qualified company based on their expertise and capability to meet the project requirements.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Since 2011, Indio's Avenue 44 Bridge project has been steadily progressing thanks to federal funding. This initiative aims to replace the low water crossing that is routinely damaged during severe storm events. Over the years, the project has navigated various phases, including environmental clearances, and acquiring necessary right of way to build the bridge.

The project encountered delays due to ongoing coordination and design adaptations with Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and the Coachella Valley Association of Government’s (CVAG) CV Link project. As a part of the hydraulic analysis for the bridge, an upstream grade control system is required to reduce the energy of the water before it gets to the bridge. This crucial element was integrated into the final design. Coordination with CVWD and CVAG, kept the project moving along to where we could complete the design for the new bridge.

Following Tropical Storm Hilary's devastation on August 19, 2023, Avenue 44 was rendered impassable due to overwhelming stormwaters washing away the road. With the bridge design near AGENDA ITEM #8.19
Professional Services Agreement with Harris & Associates, Inc., in an am... Page 693 of 1671 completion, the City swiftly sought funding for construction, collaborating with Caltrans to secure Highway Bridge Program funding for a permanent solution. Avenue 44 in the wash has a long history of susceptibility to storm damage, with incidents in March 2020 and the Valentine's Day floods of 2019, as the two most recent before Tropical Storm Hilary.

The bridge project includes widening Avenue 44, introducing bike lanes and sidewalks, and enhancing access to the CV Link and community facilities. The construction also includes relocating Indio Water Authority (IWA) facilities into the bridge along with existing gas and telecommunication facilities. The bridge is located along Avenue 44 between Palo Verde Street and Aztec Street. The City received formal authorization to proceed with Construction from Caltrans on September 15, 2023. The City proceeded to resurvey the channel to account for the existing condition of the roadway and sediment in the channel following Tropical Storm Hilary. The City received final plans and specifications on December 22, 2023.

On February 26, 2024, the City release a Request for Proposals (RFP) from qualified firms to submit proposals for the Construction Management and Inspection Services on the Avenue 44 Low Water Crossing Replacement at the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel Project.

On March 28, 2024, the following six (6) firms submitted proposals for the scope of services requested:

Bidder’s Name Location
Anser Advisory Irvine, CA
Falcon Engineering Services Temecula, CA
Fountainhead Consulting Corporation Fontana, CA
Harris & Associates Ontario, CA
Southstar | DCCM Riverside, CA
TKE Engineering Palm Desert, CA
A review committee made up of City staff evaluated the RFPs and selected the top four most qualified companies including Anser Advisor, Falcon Engineering Services, Fountainhead Consulting Corporation, and Harris & Associates to move forward to an interview with the Evaluation Committee.

The Evaluation Committee interviewed these four (4) consulting companies on April 26, 2024. The evaluation committee evaluated these firms based on their experience, understanding of the work to be done, quality of staff, familiarity with state and federal procedures, and a demonstrated technical ability to meet the needs of the project. Through this process, the Evaluation Committee selected Harris & Associates as the most qualified consultant.

Staff has negotiated the final cost proposal from Harris & Associates and believes their fee to be fair and reasonable for the services and staffing requested.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY:

Current FY Financial
Impact:
$2,550,000.00 In current year budget: Yes
Current FY General
Fund Impact:
$0 Budget adjustment: N/A

Page 2 of 62 ends

Indio City CouncilJuly 17, 2024

Indio City Council
July 17, 2024