CITY OF IRWINDALE
5050 N. IRWINDALE AVE., IRWINDALE CA 91706 • PHONE: (626) 430-2200
NOTICE AND AGENDA FOR THE SPECIAL AND
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
IRWINDALE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HOUSING AUTHORITY
RECLAMATION AUTHORITY
March 12, 2025
SPECIAL MEETING – 5:30 PM
REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 PM
LARRY G. BURROLA - Mayor
H. MANUEL ORTIZ - Mayor Pro Tem
ALBERT F. AMBRIZ - Councilmember
MARK A. BRECEDA - Councilmember
MANUEL R. GARCIA - Councilmember
Via Zoom Webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87104592389 In the event that a Zoom broadcast is unavailable, staff will promptly notify the public through its social media platforms. The public meeting will proceed in accordance with The Brown Act.
Listen Over Phone: 1-669-900-6833; Webinar ID: 871-0459-2389
March 12, 2025
Spontaneous Communications: The public is encouraged to address the City Council on any matter listed on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. The City Council will hear public comments on items listed on the agenda during discussion of the matter and prior to a vote. The City Council will hear public comments on matters not listed on the agenda during the Spontaneous Communications period.
Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future City Council meeting.
Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the ADA and Government Code section 54953(g), the City Council has adopted a reasonable accommodation policy to swiftly resolve accommodation requests. The policy can be found on the City’s website: https://www.irwindaleca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/8075/AB2449-Reasonable-Accommodation-Policy. If you need special assistance to participate in a City Council or Commission meeting or other services offered by this City, including an electronic or printed copy of the City’s reasonable accommodation policy, please contact City Hall at (626) 430-2200. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
Note: Staff reports are available for inspection at the office of the Chief Deputy City Clerk, City Hall, 5050 N.
Irwindale Avenue, during regular business hours (8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday).
Compensation for Board Members: Compensation for the members of the Irwindale City Council is $750.16 a month. In accordance with Government Code Section 54952.3, Councilmembers will not receive any additional compensation or stipend for the convening of the regular meetings of the Successor Agency to the Irwindale Community Redevelopment Agency. Councilmembers will receive additional compensation of $50/meeting, not to exceed $150 per month, for the convening the regular meetings of the Irwindale Housing Authority and an additional compensation of $300/meeting for convening the regular meetings of the Irwindale Reclamation Authority.
March 12, 2025
Code of Ethics
As City of Irwindale Council Members, our fundamental duty is to serve the public good. We are committed to the principle of an efficient and professional local government. We will be exemplary in obeying the letter and spirit of Local, State and Federal laws and City policies affecting the operation of the government and in our private life. We will be independent and impartial in our judgment and actions.
We will work for the common good of the City of Irwindale community and not for any private or personal interest. We will endeavor to treat all people with respect and civility. We will commit to observe the highest standards of morality and integrity, and to faithfully discharge the duties of our office regardless of personal consideration. We shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of others.
We will inform ourselves on public issues, listen attentively to public discussions before the body, and focus on the business at hand. We will base our decisions on the merit and substance of that business. We will be fair and equitable in all actions, claims or transactions. We shall not use our official position to influence government decisions in which we have a financial interest or where we have a personal relationship that could present a conflict of interest, or create a perception of a conflict of interest.
We shall not take advantage of services or opportunities for personal gain by virtue of our public office that are not available to the public in general. We shall refrain from accepting gifts, favors or promises of future benefit that might compromise our independence of judgment or action or give the appearance of being compromised.
We will behave in a manner that does not bring discredit or embarrassment to the City of Irwindale. We will be honest in thought and deed in both our personal and official lives.
Ultimate responsibility for complying with this Code of Ethics rests with the individual elected official. In addition to any other penalty as provided by law, violation of this Code of Ethics may be used as a basis for disciplinary action or censure of a Council Member.
These things we hereby pledge to do in the interest and purposes for which our government has been established.
Irwindale City Council
March 12, 2025
SPECIAL MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Albert F. Ambriz, Mark A. Breceda, Manuel R. Garcia; Mayor Pro Tem H. Manuel Ortiz; Mayor Larry G. Burrola
3. AB 2449 DISCLOSURES
Remote participation by a member of the legislative body for just cause or emergency circumstances
4. SPONTANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS
Spontaneous communications are limited to the special meeting agenda items only.
5. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Real Property Negotiator
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 14905 Los Angeles Street, Irwindale CA
Agency Negotiator: Julian Miranda, Executive Director
Negotiating Parties: Marianna Diaz
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
*Housing Authority Item
Property: 16359 Arrow Highway
Agency Negotiator: Julian A. Miranda, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: 39 Dalton Financial Ltd. Partnership Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
*City Item
Property: 16336 Arrow Highway
Agency Negotiator: Julian A. Miranda, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: Grainger, Linette Trust; Linette Grainger Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
*City Item
6. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
7. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
8. ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR MEETING
March 12, 2025
9. CALL TO ORDER
10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
11. INVOCATION
12. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Albert F. Ambriz, Mark A. Breceda, Manuel R. Garcia; Mayor Pro Tem H. Manuel Ortiz; Mayor Larry G. Burrola
13. AB 2449 DISCLOSURES
Remote participation by a member of the legislative body for just cause or emergency circumstances
14. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
15. COUNCIL MEMBER TRAVEL REPORTS
16. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
17. INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES/PROMOTIONS
A. Introduction of Community Development Office Specialist Cynthia Largaespada
18. PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS / COMMENDATIONS
A. Foothill Goldline Glendora to Pomona Substantial Completion video B. Presentation by Valley County Water District - Ensuring Water Safety and Reliability C. Proclamation proclaiming Red Cross Month
19. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of the Special and Regular Meetings of January 22, 2025, and the Special Meeting of February 4, 2025
Department: City Clerk
Recommendation: Approve
B. Warrants / Demands / Payroll
Department: Finance
Recommendation: Approve.
C. Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan
Department: Community Development
Recommendation:
March 12, 2025
City Manager’s Recommendation : That the City Council consider the Planning Commission’s Resolutions Nos. 834(24), 835(24), 836(24), 837(24), and 838(24) recommending the City Council certify the FEIR and approve the proposed Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan and associated entitlements; and:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-01-3589, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE city council of the CITY OF IRWINDALE (1) CERTIFYing THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, STATE CLEARING HOUSE (SCH# 2023020290); (2) ADOPTing THE FINDINGS REQUIRED BY CEQA GUIDELINES, SECTION 15091; (3) ADOPTing THE PROPOSED MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; AND (4) ADOPTing A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR THE IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN”;
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-02-3590, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE city council OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE AMENDing THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT AND LAND USE PLAN MAP OF THE CITY’S GENERAL PLAN (GPA NO. 02-2022) FROM REGIONAL COMMERCIAL TO SPECIFIC PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 LIVE OAK LANE, IRWINDALE, CA (APNs: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-047) AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF”;
3. Introduce Ordinance No. 787, entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 02-2023 to add irwindale gateway SPECIFIC PLAN to title 17 of the irwindale municipal code (imc), DEFINING permitted uses, regulating the sizes and locations of buildings, specifying design GUIDELINES and development standards, addressing mobility and connectivity topics, identifying project infrastructure and services, and providing administrative and implementation language for property located at 13620 live oak lane, irwindale, ca (APNs: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-047) AND FINDING THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2023020290)”;
4. Introduce Ordinance No. 788, entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE MODIFYING THE CITY OF IRWINDALE ZONING MAP (ZONE CHANGE NO. 02-2022) FROM M-2 (HEAVY MANUFACTURING) TO IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN for property located at 13620 LIVE OAK LANE, IRWINDALE, CA (APNs: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-047) AND FINDING THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2023020290)”; and
5. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-05-3593, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE city council of the city of irwindale APPROVing TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83854 TO CREATE SEVEN (7) PARCELS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 LIVE OAK LANE, IRWINDALE, CA (APNS: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-04) in the M-2 (HEAVY Manufacturing) Zone SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN, MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.”
D. Award Professional Services Contract for Annual Audit Services Department: Finance
Recommendation: Approve a contract with LSL, LLP to provide annual audit services for five years.
E. Adopt Resolutions of Intent to Amend the Contract Between CalPERS and the City of Irwindale to Implement a Pension Cost Share Provision for Unrepresented Management and Executive Employees
Department: Human Resources
March 12, 2025
Recommendation: (1) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-20-3605 entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE RELATING TO CALPERS RETIREMENT COST-SHARING UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 20516 BY UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES” and (2) Adopt Resolution No. 2025-19-3607 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF IRWINDALE RELATING TO CALPERS RETIREMENT COST-SHARING UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 20516 BY UNREPRESENTED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES." F. Los Angles County Department of Public Health – Public Health Services Agreement Department: Administration
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Los Angles County Department of Public Health – Public Health Services Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
G. Out of State Travel to the International Council of Shopping Centers Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada for City Council and City Staff
Department: Administration
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-25-3613 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE APPROVING THE OUT OF STATE TRAVEL TO THE 2025
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS CONFERENCE IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA FOR THREE CITY COUNCILMEMBERS AND TWO STAFF MEMBERS" reading by title only and waiving further reading thereof.
H. Adopting Irwindale's Energy Resilience Action Plan
Department: Public Services
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-24-3612 entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE ADOPTING IRWINDALE’S ENERGY RESILIENCE ACTION PLAN (ERAP) AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE ERAP COMMITMENT LETTER”.
I. Approval of Lease of City's Water Production Rights for FY2024/2025 Department: Public Services
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign the First Extension of Temporary Assignment or Lease of Water Rights with Valley County Water District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
J. Declaration of Surplus Vehicles, Equipment, and Miscellaneous Items Department: Public Services
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-22-3610 entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE DELCARING VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, AND MISCELLANEOUS
ITEMS AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING DISPOSITION OF THE SURPLUS VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS”.
March 12, 2025
K. Approve Contract Extension to the 4th of July Fireworks Spectacular Show Department: Public Services
Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract extension for the July 4th Fireworks Spectacular Show.
L. Award of as-needed civil engineering, subdivision map review, and land surveying services contract
Department: Engineering
Recommendation:
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Coory Engineering for As-Needed Civil Engineering, Subdivision Map Review, and Land Surveying Services for an amount not-to-exceed $250,000.
20. SPONTANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time set aside for members of the audience speak on items not on this agenda that are within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. State law prohibits any Council discussion or action on such communications unless 1) the Council by majority vote finds that a catastrophe or emergency exists; or 2) the Council by at least four votes finds that the matter (and need for action thereon) arose within the last five days. Since the Council cannot participate (except as stated), it is requested that all such communications be made in writing to be included on the next agenda for full discussion and action
All members of the public are asked to observe the City’s Rules of Procedure and Public Meeting Decorum. The City’s Rules of Procedure and Public Meeting Decorum can be found on the City’s website, and Chapter 2.40 of the Irwindale Municipal Code. You may also contact the City Clerk’s Office for copies.
Each speaker will be limited to 3 minutes unless such time limits are extended. If a member of the public wishes to donate their time to another speaker, both persons must be physically present and in attendance of the meeting. The Presiding Officer may, in his or her discretion, extend the 3-minute time limitation for the particular subject for all speakers. Organized groups of persons wishing to address the Council on the same subject should select a spokesperson to represent the group, so as to avoid unnecessary repetition. In no event shall the total amount of speaking time for exceed 6 minutes per person for the subject under discussion.
The Council may regulate a speaker who is speaking too long or out of order, being unduly repetitious, discussing irrelevancies, or extending to items not within its subject matter jurisdiction. Please be reminded that discrimination, abusive use of profanity, unruly disruption, and violent or physically threatening conduct is discouraged. Members of the public shall not disrupt the orderly conduct of the meeting. The Presiding Officer will request that a person cease any disruptive conduct, and if not immediately stopped, will direct the person to be removed from the meeting.
Public Comments will be heard in the following order:
March 12, 2025
1: In-person attendees
2: Teleconference attendees
3: In-person and teleconference attendees who have not previously provided comments on the matter(s) being discussed by the legislative body
21. NEW BUSINESS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on New Business.
A. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 Department: Finance
Recommendation: Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Supplemental Audit Letters for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024.
B. Mid-Year Financial Review and Adjustments to the FY 2024-2025 Budget Department: Finance
Recommendation: That the City Council and Reclamation Authority Board adopt Resolutions No. 2025-26-3614 and RA 2025-04-043, respectively, entitled: “A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE AND THE IRWINDALE RECLAMATION AUTHORITY BOARD APPROVING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025”.
C. Request for Speed Humps Installation on Hidalgo Street and Martinez Street Update Department: Engineering
Recommendation: (1) Receive and file this update; (2) Discuss and approve Option 2 regarding the construction of the speed humps on Hidalgo Street.
22. PUBLIC HEARINGS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on Public Hearings.
23. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
24. REQUESTS FOR AGENDA ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL
If a City Council Member is interested in a task or project, the City Council Member shall request that the item be agendized in this section.
25. ADJOURN
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE IRWINDALE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
26. AB 2449 DISCLOSURES
March 12, 2025
Remote participation by a member of the legislative body for just cause or emergency circumstances
27. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 22, 2025
Department: City Clerk
Recommendation: Approve
B. Award Professional Services Contract for Annual Audit Services Department: Finance
Recommendation: Approve the extension of the existing contract with LSL, LLP to provide annual audit services for five additional years.
28. SPONTANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time set aside for members of the audience to speak on items not on this agenda.
Spontaneous Communications for the Successor Agency are subject to the same State prohibitions and City guidelines as cited on the City Council agenda.
29. NEW BUSINESS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on New Business.
A. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 Department: Finance
Recommendation: Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Supplemental Audit Letters for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024.
30. PUBLIC HEARINGS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on Public Hearings.
31. ADJOURN
HOUSING AUTHORITY
32. AB 2449 DISCLOSURES
Remote participation by a member of the legislative body for just cause or emergency circumstances
33. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Award Professional Services Contract for Annual Audit Services Department: Finance
Recommendation: Approve the extension of the existing contract with LSL, LLP to provide annual audit services for five additional years.
March 12, 2025
B. Resolution No. HA 2025-02-146, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE IRWINDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE USE OF THE 10-ACRE SITE ON ALLEN DRIVE, ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 8417-34-912, FOR THE CITY OF IRWINDALE’S JULY 4, 2025, FIREWORKS DISPLAY SPECTACULAR EVENT”.
Department: Public Services
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. HA 2025-02-146, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE IRWINDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE USE OF THE 10-ACRE SITE ON ALLEN DRIVE, ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 8417-34-912, FOR THE CITY OF IRWINDALE’S JULY 4, 2025, FIREWORKS DISPLAY SPECTACULAR EVENT” by title only, with further reading waved.
34. SPONTANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time set aside for members of the audience to speak on items not on this agenda.
Spontaneous Communications for the Housing Authority are subject to the same State prohibitions and City guidelines as cited on the City Council agenda.
35. NEW BUSINESS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on New Business.
A. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 Department: Finance
Recommendation: Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Supplemental Audit Letters for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024.
36. PUBLIC HEARINGS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on Public Hearings.
37. ADJOURN
RECLAMATION AUTHORITY
As required by Government Code section 54954.3, members of the City Council are also members of the Reclamation Authority, which is concurrently convening with the City Council this evening and each Council Member is paid an additional stipend of $300 for attending the Reclamation Authority meeting.
38. AB 2449 DISCLOSURES
Remote participation by a member of the legislative body for just cause or emergency circumstances
39. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held December 11, 2024 Department: City Clerk
Recommendation: Approve
March 12, 2025
B. Investment Quarterly Report for Fiscal Quarter Ending December 31, 2024 Department: Finance
Recommendation: Receive and file the Investment Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2024.
C. 2025 1st Quarter Mining Report of Nine (9) SMARA Pits Department: Engineering
Recommendation: Receive and file this report.
D. Award Professional Services Contract for Annual Audit Services Department: Finance
Recommendation: Approve the extension of the existing contract with LSL, LLP to provide annual audit services for five additional years.
40. SPONTANEOUS COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time set aside for members of the audience to speak on items not on this agenda.
Spontaneous Communications for the Reclamation Authority are subject to the same State prohibitions and City guidelines as cited on the City Council agenda.
41. NEW BUSINESS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on New Business.
A. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024 Department: Finance
Recommendation: Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Supplemental Audit Letters for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2024.
B. Mid-Year Financial Review and Adjustments to the FY 2024-2025 Budget Department: Finance
Recommendation: That the City Council and Reclamation Authority Board adopt Resolutions No. 2025-26-3614 and RA 2025-04-043, respectively, entitled: “A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE AND THE IRWINDALE RECLAMATION AUTHORITY BOARD APPROVING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025”.
42. PUBLIC HEARINGS
At this time, members of the audience may ask to be heard regarding an item on Public Hearings.
43. ADJOURN
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Laura M. Nieto, Chief Deputy City Clerk, certify that I caused the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council, Irwindale Successor Agency to the Irwindale Community Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority, and Reclamation Authority, to be held on
March 12, 2025
March 12, 2025, be posted at the City Hall, Library, and Post Office on March 6, 2025. ______________________
Laura M. Nieto, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
IRWINDALE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 22, 2025
5050 N. IRWINDALE AVENUE WEDNESDAY
IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA 91706 5:15 P.M.
The Irwindale CITY COUNCIL and HOUSING AUTHORITY met in a special joint meeting at the above time and place.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Albert F. Ambriz, Mark A. Breceda, Manuel R. Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem H. Manuel Ortiz;
Mayor Larry G. Burrola
Also Present: Julian A. Miranda, City Manager; Adrian Guerra, City Attorney; Theresa Olivares, Assistant City Manager; and Laura Nieto, Chief Deputy City Clerk
AB 2449 DISCLOSURES None.
SPONTANEOUS
COMMUNICATIONS There were no speakers.
RECESS TO At 5:17 p.m., the City Council met in Closed Session to discuss the CLOSED SESSION following:
Public Employee Performance Evaluation
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
ACTION: Performance evaluation was conducted; no reportable action.
RECONVENE IN At 6:11 p.m., the City Council reconvened in Open Session.
OPEN SESSION
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned at 6:11 p.m.
________________________________
Laura M. Nieto, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
IRWINDALE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 22, 2025
5050 N. IRWINDALE AVENUE WEDNESDAY
IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA 91706 6:12 P.M.
The Irwindale CITY COUNCIL met in regular session at the above time and place.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Albert F. Ambriz, Mark A. Breceda, Manuel R. Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem H. Manuel Ortiz.
Mayor Larry G. Burrola
Also Present: Julian A. Miranda, City Manager; Adrian Guerra, City Attorney; Theresa Olivares, Assistant City Manager; Christopher Hofford, Chief of Police; Kambiz Borhani, Director of Finance / City Treasurer; Eddie Chan, Director of Engineering / Building Official; Elizabeth Rodriguez, Public Services Director; Mary Hull, Human Resources Manager, and Laura Nieto, Chief Deputy City Clerk AB 2449 DISCLOSURES None.
CHANGES TO THE
AGENDA
CITY MANAGER City Manager Miranda noted an update to Item No. 20H and noted MIRANDA that an amendment and appropriation from the General Fund Reserve would not be needed.
COUNCILMEMBER
TRAVEL REPORTS None.
COUNCILMEMBER
COMMENTS None.
INTRODUCTION OF
NEW EMPLOYEES /
PROMOTIONS
ITEM NO. 17A INTRODUCTION OF OFFICE SPECIALIST SASHA FUENTES
INTRODUCTION OF
OFFICE SPECIALIST Assistant City Manager Olivares introduced Office Specialist SASHA FUENTES Sasha Fuentes.
ITEM NO. 17B INTRODUCTION OF ASSOCIATE PLANNER MARIO ARRELLANO
INTRODUCTION OF
ASSOCIATE PLANNER Director Simpson introduced Associate Planner Mario Arrellano.
MARIO ARRELLANO
ITEM NO. 17C INTRODUCTION OF ASSISTANT PLANNER JARROD PALMER
INTRODUCTION OF
ASSISTANT PLANNER Director Simpson introduced Assistant Planner Jarrod Palmer.
JARROD PALMER
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 2
ITEM NO. 17D INTRODUCTION OF ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN MIGUEL
INTRODUCTION OF JIMENEZ
ENGINEERING
TECHNICIAN MIGUEL Director Chan introduced Engineering Technician Miguel Jimenez.
JIMENEZ
PROCLAMATIONS /
PRESENTATIONS /
COMMENDATIONS
ITEM NO. 18A RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING CITY COMMISSIONERS
RECOGNITION OF
OUTGOING CITY Former Senior Commissioner Patricia Gonzales & Parks & COMMISSIONERS Recreation Commissioner Belen Zepeda (not in attendance) were recognized.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. 19A IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN
IRWINDALE GATEWAY
SPECIFIC PLAN
CITY MANAGER City Manager Miranda introduced the item.
MIRANDA
SENIOR PLANNER Senior Planner Jones presented the report and summarized the JONES information presented at the previous Council meeting.
JOANNE HATFIELD Joanne Hatfield, Principal with Placeworks and the Project Manager for the project Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”), provided an overview on CEQA and her approach on the EIR. She advised that the report was not prepared to favor one viewpoint over another, and made a PowerPoint presentation on her CEQA processes, impacts, and findings.
STEVE BUSH Steve Bush with Placeworks spoke on his evaluation of emergency situations that could occur should there be a thermal runaway event at the battery facility that could lead to the release of toxic gasses from the combustion.
JEFF DREITLY Jeff Dreitly, the project applicant, spoke on old BESS technology vs. new, spoke on the process to date, and addressed safety facts and the benefits this project would present to the City. He noted that this same information was presented to the Planning Commission in November.
OPEN At 7:24 p.m., Mayor Burrola opened the Public Hearing.
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 3
DENA ZEPEDA Dena Zepeda stated that residents are not in favor of the project and stated that it would cause residents to suffer additional illnesses.
ROBERT DIAZ Robert Diaz said that the project has not been determined to be safe, asked about particulate matter and techniques used by firefighters to put out fires, expressed concern about air quality impacts and potential freeway lane closures caused by structure fires, stated that the project goes against the City’s General Plan, takes power from the City, and suggested that the City disapprove the Specific Plan and instead consider implementing an assessment district.
WILLIAM KURT William Kurt spoke in favor of approving the project since the structure would be built by union members.
FRED BARBOSA Fred Barbosa stated that commercial zoning for the subject area would not work, stated that problems at other BESS facilities were caused by issues with older technology, and stated that the opposition to the project is caused by fearmongering and not by actual science. He urged the Council to approve the project.
RAMON MENDOZA Ramon Mendoza with the sprinkler-fitters union spoke in favor of the project due to the project labor agreement.
CARMEN ROMAN Carmen Roman stated that residents are concerned about the safety of the project and suggested conducting EIRs for each of the two options presented. She claimed that residents were not given the opportunity to voice their concerns at public meetings. She also mentioned a flyer she received in the mail which she believed to be propaganda. She stated that residents that oppose the project are prepared to take their concerns to the state level and suggested that the project benefits do not outweigh residents’ health.
RENE PALACIOS Rene Palacios with Local 433 strongly urged the Council to approve the project due to its project labor agreement.
EDDIE ALVAREZ Eddie Alvarez with the Los Angeles / Orange County Building Construction Aid Council encouraged approval of the project since it would make Irwindale a leader in clean energy, strong economic impact, and its related project labor agreements, which would cut down on traffic and smog.
JEFF DREITLY In response to a previous speaker’s comment, Jeff Dreitly advised that his company has not drafted a development agreement since that would be a task undertaken by the City. He also indicated that the certification of the EIR and the adoption of the Specific Plan would not signal the final approval of the BESS project.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 4
BRIAN FINK Brian Fink, a retired Battalion Chief from New York, spoke on his experience with BESS projects and advised that he trains firefighters on how to respond to facility emergencies. He advised that new BESS facilities have become much safer in comparison to previous facilities and stressed that the smoke that comes from BESS container fires are no different from housefires. He added that the proposed site is one of the best sites he’s seen anywhere for this type of project.
DENA ZEPEDA Dena Zepeda stated that income is more important to the project developers than the lives of residents and indicated that residents fear for their lives due to this project.
CARMEN ROMAN Carmen Roman alleged that the Fire Battalion has not reached out to local fire departments to train them on how to put out BESS fires. She also stated that Irwindale residents already have jobs and would not benefit from the jobs created by the project.
ROBERT DIAZ Robert Diaz stated that no mention has been made about the water table near the Hanson site and wondered whether it would be contaminated should there be a BESS fire.
BRIAN FINK Fire Battalion Chief Brian Fink addressed a previous comment and advised that he has trained Los Angeles County Fire Department crews and noted that this location would also receive said training.
Regarding water and soil contamination, he advised that soil and groundwater has been tested and resulted in zero levels of toxins.
RENE SAPIEN Rene Sapien worried that the subject site could become a target for a terrorist attack and claimed that the project investors are ultra wealthy and, as such, the City should receive billions in income from the project.
LINDA MAREZ Linda Marez stated that, even if there is a 1% chance that something could go wrong with the facility, that would be enough to avoid developing it, since the residents would be the ones to bear the consequences.
JOE SULLIVAN Joe Sullivan, with the National Electrical Contractors Association of Greater Los Angeles, spoke in support of the project since it is necessary for energy resilience, would help the state meet its energy goals, and would pay workers good wages.
ANONYMOUS An anonymous individual spoke in support of approving the project.
MALENA An individual identified as Malena wrote in opposition to the project due to environmental concerns.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 5
GABBY SANCHEZ Gabby Sanchez expressed her opposition to the project.
SUZANNE GOMEZ Suzanne Gomez suggested supporting a different project for the site.
She stated that the City of Acton is suing to stop any BESS type of project, Escondido has a moratorium on BESS projects, and Monterey Bay evacuated everyone within three miles due to toxic gasses from a BESS facility. She also questioned the interpretation of social justice as relates to the City and stated that the City should prepare to fight the state should it be necessary.
MICHAEL CACCIOTTI Michael Cacciotti expressed his support for the BESS project. He stated that 30+ communities have invested in multiple large-scale solar projects, and none have experienced any safety issues and noted that the City of South Pasadena will form part of a Clean Power Alliance to create micro-grids over the next year, which would be needed to reduce pollution by adopting certain measures.
JACQUELINE FUENTES Jacqueline Fuentes spoke against the project. She stated that these types of projects exploit vulnerable populations and noted that residents are already exposed to air pollution due to rock quarries.
GABBY SANCHEZ Gabby Sanchez opposed the project and expressed concern over patients at City of Hope hospital and children in nearby schools.
CLOSE There being no additional speakers, Mayor Burrola closed the public PUBLIC HEARING hearing at 8:21 p.m.
SENIOR PLANNER Senior Planner Brandi Jones made the following points and JONES clarifications:
1) Members of the public were given several opportunities to voice their opinions; however, very few comments were actually received.
2) Members of the Fire Department have previously addressed concerns regarding air, soil, and water.
3) Regarding the desire to take the matter to the state, she noted that the state would likely accept the project with open arms. 4) With respect to the comment that the project would go against the General Plan, she advised that the General Plan designation is regional commercial, and a zoning designation does not currently exist that is compatible with regional commercial. She added that commercial zoning as described by Mr. Diaz would likely not work since most consumers prefer online shopping rather than visiting brick and mortar stores.
5) She advised that the Zoning ordinance would be revised and amended to include language regarding the specific plan. 6) A suggestion was made to have an assessment district so that the City is not responsible for any fees for improvements, to which she noted that the applicant is paying for the entire project and the City is not responsible for any construction fees.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 6
7) She also advised that Placeworks is the City’s consultant and that the City is the lead agency.
8) If the project is split, there would still only be a need for one EIR. 9) The General Plan was last updated in 2008, and the Housing Element was last updated in 2013, and there were no radical General Plan amendments during the time that Ms. Roman served on the Planning Commission.
10)A development agreement has not been submitted since a Specific Plan has not been approved.
11)The closest residents to the project would reside in Baldwin Park, and the closest Irwindale residents would reside on Alice Rodriguez Circle; no Irwindale residents would reside across the street from the proposed project.
12)With regard to employment opportunities, the project would offer employment to those in the general vicinity, not just Irwindale residents.
13)Regarding waiting for safer batteries in the future, she noted that new lithium batteries are safer than those from the past. 14)A dedicated website has been created that has lots of information available to members of the public. Copies of environmental documents can be found at City Hall, the Library, and the Community Development Department.
15)Regarding the concern that the site could be subject to a terrorist attack, staff sent this project to the Irwindale Police Department for review, which did not cite concerns.
JOANNE HATFIELD Joanne Hatfield advised that comments from members of the public were included in the EIR. A notice of preparation was sent to public and responsible agencies as well as individuals residing within 500 feet of the project, and that their responses are in the report.
Regarding the comment about particulates: the study showed that pollutant particulates were not urgent. As for the designation for a commercial overlay, this could not be accommodated without a major new analysis and recirculation of the EIR. With respect to the impacts to nearby facilities, the health risks were analyzed and found to be less than significant.
REOPEN Mayor Burrola reopened the public hearing at 8:33 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING
CARMEN ROMAN Carmen Roman stated that she did not believe that Senior Planner Jones spoke truthfully and stated that members of the public were not allowed to speak.
CLOSE There being no additional speakers, Mayor Burrola closed the public PUBLIC HEARING hearing at 8:35 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 7
MAYOR PRO TEM Responding to questions and comments by Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz, ORTIZ Mrs. Hatfield advised that the BESS project was part of the scoping meeting for input from the public and concerned agencies to discuss what they wanted to have addressed in the EIR. The scoping meeting was advertised in the Notice of Preparation, which included details for both project options.
DINA GASS Dina Gass, with Placeworks, advised that all comments received at the scoping meeting were included in Appendix A-2.
JOANNE HATFIELD Mrs. Hatfield stated that Table 2-1 of the EIR summarizes the comments received, and that it does not appear that any BESSrelated concerns had been raised. She did, however, note a comment received from Robert Diaz, who stated that the EIR needs to provide more info on the BESS, which are subject to fires and explosions.
MAYOR PRO TEM Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz asked whether project options 1 and 2 were ORTIZ presented at the scoping meetings, to which Mrs. Hatfield confirmed that they were and noted that they were included in the Notice of Preparation and in the presentation made at the Scoping Meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz noted that many concerns have been raised regarding environmental impacts and stated that this project was not urgent and could wait. However, should the Council determine that MOTION action must be taken, he made a motion to approve the EIR as well as option 1 for the development of three buildings and implement a moratorium on the BESS project until concerns are addressed more fully and once this type of energy is accepted in more communities.
MAYOR BURROLA Mayor Burrola thanked all those that participated with comments. He noted that residents are very concerned about battery storage and noted that this project would reside in Irwindale for over 20 years. He cited comments of concern made by a professor from Texas A&M and Governor Newsom and stated that he did not feel that the project was right for Irwindale at this time.
SECOND Mayor Burrola seconded Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz’s motion.
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Breceda stated that he was not completely BRECEDA convinced that this project would benefit the City and mentioned that this project appears to be rushed and that the City is not prepared for this project at this point.
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Garcia questioned how the proposed BESS would GARCIA harness 400 megawatts of energy and concurred that the project would probably not work for Irwindale at this point.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 8
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Ambriz acknowledged the residents’ concerns AMBRIZ regarding the BESS and stated that he has retracted his support for it. He stated that BESS technology has not yet reached a point where it can be deemed safe for the community. He did, however, state that he had reservations about implementing a moratorium, to which City Attorney Guerra advised that a moratorium is not on the agenda for consideration tonight and could not be discussed.
CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Guerra stated that, if it is inclined to act, the Council GUERRA could direct staff to continue the public hearing to a date certain, direct staff to revise each of the approvals to remove Option 2 except for the EIR documents and bring back an item to discuss a potential moratorium.
RECESS At 8:55 p.m., the Council took a short recess.
RECONVENE The City Council reconvened in Open Session at 9:13 p.m., with all members present.
CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Guerra asked whether the Council would like the matter GUERRA to be placed on the Consent Calendar for a future meeting.
MAYOR BURROLA Responding to a question by Mayor Burrola, City Attorney Guerra indicated that staff would return with the EIR document, and that each of the other documents would only reflect Option 1.
MAYOR PRO TEM Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz asked that all changes be highlighted in the ORTIZ report.
CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Guerra stated that, based on the comments made by GUERRA the Council, the appropriate motion would be to: 1) direct staff to revise each of the documents to reflect Option 1 and remove Option 2, 2) place approvals on the Consent Calendar at the second regular meeting in February, to include the EIR, and 3) have staff bring back a discussion of a moratorium on the BESS.
MAYOR PRO TEM Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz concurred with City Attorney Guerra’s ORTIZ suggestion for the motion.
ROLL CALL The above-mentioned motion was unanimously approved on roll call vote.
CITY MANAGER City Manager Miranda thanked Fire Marshal Stillwagon and Fire MIRANDA Specialist Costello for their participation in the discussions.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 9
MAYOR PRO TEM Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz indicated that an emergency arose and left the ORTIZ meeting at 9:17 p.m.
ITEM NO. 19B AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 02- AMENDMENT NO. 1 2016, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ATHENS SERVICES TO D.A. NO. 02-2016, FRANCHISE & FACILITY OPERATIONS AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENT NO. 1 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO FRANCHISE AGREEMENT FOR WASTE TO THE ATHENS SVCS. HAULING SERVICES
FRANCHISE & FACILITY
OPERATIONS AGMT.,
AND AMENDMENT
NO. 5 TO FRANCHISE
AGMT. FOR WASTE
HAULING SERVICES
DIRECTOR SIMPSON Director Simpson presented the staff report.
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Ambriz stated that, at the end of the public hearing, AMBRIZ he would like to approve the item as recommended by staff.
OPEN At 9:25 p.m., Mayor Burrola opened the public hearing.
PUBLIC HEARING
ROBERT DIAZ Robert Diaz suggested that the City negotiate with other franchise waste haulers and then choose the best fit. He stated that he would not like the City to be locked to an agreement with Athens if a better deal could be possible with a competitor.
CLOSE There being no additional speakers, Mayor Burrola closed the public PUBLIC HEARING hearing at 9:26 p.m.
MOTION A motion was made by Councilmember Ambriz to introduce Ordinance No. 786, entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 02-2016 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
IRWINDALE AND ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC., A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DBA ATHENS SERVICES,
LOCATED AT 2200 ARROW HIGHWAY, IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA
91706 (APN 8535-001-039) AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(“CEQA”) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162”,
adopt Resolution No. 2025-14-3602, entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE FRANCHISE &
FACILITY OPERATIONS AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
CITY OF IRWINDALE AND ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA
ATHENS SERVICES FOR THE MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY
/ TRANSFER STATION (MRF / TS) ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT
2200 ARROW HIGHWAY, IRWINDALE, CA 91706 (APN: 8535-001-
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 10
039), AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”)
PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162”, and adopt
Resolution No. 2025-17-3605, entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE EXCLUSIVE
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT FOR WASTE HAULING SERVICES BY
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF IRWINDALE AND ARAKELIAN
ENTERPRISES, INC., DBA ATHENS SERVICES, AND FINDING
THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) PURSUANT TO CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15162.”
MAYOR BURROLA Responding to a question by Mayor Burrola, Director Simpson advised that the term of the franchise agreement would not be extended.
CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Guerra added that this item would extend the time GUERRA period that Athens has to build the convenience store.
MAYOR BURROLA Mayor Burrola expressed concern since no date has been set for the completion of the convenience store or gas station, to which Director Simpson advised that the amendment would allow Athens to develop the convenience store and gas station in a future phase.
ANTHONY BERTRAND Anthony Bertrand, speaking on behalf of Athens Services, clarified that Athens is asking for more time and flexibility in determining the phase that the convenience store and gas station would be developed. He added that an important aspect of the development agreement is the flexibility to allow the project to develop as market trends dictate. He also indicated that Athens’ goal is to work diligently with City staff to achieve the target dates for phases 2 and 3 as stated in the documents.
MAYOR BURROLA Mayor Burrola stated that he would prefer to have the timeline for the development of the two facilities in writing, to which Mr. Bertrand spoke on Athens’ dedication to the project as evidenced by the company’s investments. He reiterated that the request for the amendment would allow Athens to adjust to market conditions.
Mayor Burrola stated that he was not comfortable since no specific timeline is indicated. He then asked City Attorney Guerra for his opinion, to which he stated that the matter at hand is ultimately a business decision point for the Council’s consideration.
ANTHONY BERTRAND Mr. Bertrand stated that the project was always contemplated to be built in phases. He noted the progress that Athens has made due to the flexibility the Council has previously extended to Athens and reiterated Athens’ commitment to the project.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 11
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Breceda indicated that he would also like to have a BRECEDA date for the development of the two facilities, to which Mr. Bertrand advised that the development agreement has 2030 as the target completion for phase 2 and 2035 for phase 3. Mr. Bertrand then stated that the question would be whether to include the facilities in either of these two phases; Athens would know more as the market moves in the next couple of years.
Councilmember Breceda expressed his desire to have the
convenience store and gas station completed in phase 2.
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Garcia suggested concentrating on completing the GARCIA MRF, after which the focus could be shifted to the convenience store.
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Ambriz stated that this matter has previously been AMBRIZ discussed and concurred that the development agreement has offered the applicant the opportunity to progress depending on the state of the market. He also agreed with Councilmember Garcia to focus on the MRF first and echoed his previous motion.
COUNCILMEMBER Councilmember Garcia seconded the motion.
GARCIA
ROLL CALL The above-mentioned motion was approved with all members in favor except for Mayor Burrola, who opposed.
CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION A motion was made by Councilmember Garcia, seconded by Councilmember Breceda, to approve the Consent Calendar; The motion was unanimously approved; Mayor Pro Tem Ortiz absent.
ITEM NO. 20A WARRANTS / DEMANDS / PAYROLL
WARRANTS / DEMANDS
/ PAYROLL The warrants / demands / payroll were approved.
ITEM NO. 20B ANNUAL BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP (BVP) GRANT
ANNUAL BULLET- WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PROOF VEST
PARTNERSHIP GRANT
WITH THE DEPT. OF
JUSTICE
RESOLUTION NO. Resolution No. 2025-07-3595, entitled:
2025-07-3595
ADOPTED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IRWINDALE
POLICE DEPARTMENT’S PARTICIPATION IN AN ANNUAL
BALLISTIC VEST PARTNERSHIP GRANT OFFERED BY THE U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, AND APPROVING AN ADDITIONAL
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 12
APPROPRIATION FOR RECORDING THE REVENUE AND
EXPENDITURE FOR THIS GRANT IN THE CITY OF IRWINDALE’S
FEDERAL FUND,” was adopted, thereby authorizing the Police Department to continue to seek reimbursement for ballistic vest cost through the U.S. Department of Justice Ballistic Vest Partnership Grant Act of 1998.
ITEM NO. 20C APPROPRIATE ASSET FORFEITURE FUNDS AND INTEREST
APPROPRIATE ASSET
FORFEITURE FUNDS
AND INTEREST
RESOLUTION NO. Resolution No. 2025-12-3600, entitled:
2025-12-3600
ADOPTED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
IRWINDALE APPROVING RECEIPT OF AND APPROPRIATING
FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE FUNDS FOR USE BY THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT,” was adopted.
ITEM NO. 20D REJECTION OF CLAIM – CRISTIAN CASTANEDA
REJECTION OF CLAIMCRISTIAN CASTANEDA The claim of Cristian Castaneda vs. City of Irwindale was rejected and staff was directed to send a letter of rejection.
ITEM NO. 20E REJECTION OF CLAIM – NATALIA CASTANEDA
REJECTION OF CLAIMNATALIA CASTANEDA
The claim of Natalia Castaneda vs. City of Irwindale was rejected and staff was directed to send a letter of rejection.
ITEM NO. 20F INVESTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT FOR FISCAL QUARTER INVESTMENT ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024
QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR FISCAL QUARTER The Investment Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ending ENDING December 31, 2024, was received and filed.
DECEMBER 31, 2024
ITEM NO. 20G APPROVE A FEE WAIVER FOR IRWINDALE LIONS CLUB
APPROVE A FEE
WAIVER FOR
IRWINDALE LIONS
CLUB
RESOLUTION NO. Resolution No. 2025-15-3603, entitled:
2025-15-3603
ADOPTED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FEE WAIVER FOR
IRWINDALE LIONS CLUB, A 501(C)(3) NONPROFIT
ORGANIZATION, WAIVING CITY FACILITY RENTAL FEES OF
$1,410.00 FOR MONTHLY MEETIGNS BEGINNING JANUARY
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 13
2025 THROUGH AND INCLUDING NOVEMBER 2025 AND ONE
LIONS CLUB SPEAKER COMPETITION,” was adopted.
ITEM NO. 20H AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO DYNAMIC AWARD PLANNING + SCIENCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF HAZARD
PROFESSIONAL MITIGATION PLAN AND APPROVE APPROPRIATION OOF SERVICES CONTRACT $139,255 FROM THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE
TO DYNAMIC PLANNING
+ SCIENCE FOR THE
PREPARATION OF
HAZARD MITIGATION
PLAN AND APPROVE
APPROPRIATION OF
$139,255 FROM THE
GENERAL FUND
RESERVE
RESOLUTION NO. Resolution No. 2025-13-3601, entitled:
2025-13-3601
ADOPTED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING: 1) AN AWARD OF A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACT WITH DYNAMIC
PLANNING + SCIENCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN; 2) AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH DYNAMIC
PLANNING + SCIENCE; AND 3) AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL
YEAR 2024-2025 ADOPTED BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING
$139,255 FROM THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE,” was adopted.
ITEM NO. 20I FEE WAIVER FOR IRWINDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE’S EFEE WAIVER FOR WASTE EVENT
IRWINDALE CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE’S
E-WASTE EVENT
RESOLUTION NO. Resolution No. 2025-16-3604, entitled:
2025-16-3604
ADOPTED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FEE WAIVER FOR THE
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION FEE FOR THE E-WASTE
RECYCLING EVENT ON JANUARY 25-26, 2025,” was approved.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
SPONTANEOUS
COMMUNICATIONS There were no speakers.
NEW BUSINESS None.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2025
REGULAR MEETING PAGE 14
CITY MANAGER’S
REPORT
CITY MANAGER City Manager Miranda presented the following report:
MIRANDA
1) The community is invited to the Irwindale Public Library groundbreaking ceremony scheduled for January 25.
2) The community is also welcome to attend the ribbon cutting and street dedication ceremony for the Al “Ponchi” Cruz Circle event scheduled for February 1.
3) The community is invited to attend an event aimed at helping those affected by wildfires in conjunction with Charlie’s Produce on February 8.
4) Two trellises at Little Park of Irwindale have been renovated due to termite damage and wood rot.
5) He also invited all to participate in the Recreation Department’s “Locks of Love” program.
ASSISTANT TO THE Assistant to the City Manager Espino reported on an event taking CITY MANAGER ESPINO place this Saturday at the Irwindale Speedway site. Supervisor Hilda Solis is also hosting a drive-thru food distribution event in partnership with the City on January 25.
REQUESTS FOR
AGENDA ITEMS BY
CITY COUNCIL None.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
________________________________
Laura M. Nieto, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
IRWINDALE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FEBRUARY 4, 2025
5050 N. IRWINDALE AVENUE WEDNESDAY
IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA 91706 2:30 P.M.
The Irwindale CITY COUNCIL met in special session at the above time and place.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Albert F. Ambriz, Mark A. Breceda, Manuel R. Garcia, Mayor Pro Tem H. Manuel Ortiz;
Mayor Larry G. Burrola
Also Present: Julian A. Miranda, City Manager; Adrian Guerra, City Attorney; Theresa Olivares, Assistant City Manager; and Laura Nieto, Chief Deputy City Clerk
AB 2449 DISCLOSURES None.
SPONTANEOUS
COMMUNICATIONS
MARGUERITE LOPEZ Marguerite Lopez-Sapien questioned activities she stated are occurring at the Reliance II site, stated that she was unable to get information regarding her concern from the City, that she contacted “Heal the Bay”, and asked whether the land, water, and air would be tested and suggested that the City Attorney prepare an injunction to prevent the federal government from conducting operations at the site.
CAROLINE RODRIGUEZ Caroline Rodriguez asked the Council how it would protect the City from future incidents such what is occurring at the Reliance II site.
She asked whether the City would buy the site and rent it out to other interested parties to ensure that nothing harmful occurs there. “ERIC” A Zoom participant named Eric stated that he knew about environmental impacts at the Irwindale Speedway and asked about current demolition efforts at the site, to which City Manager Miranda stated that a demolition permit has been issued.
DIRECTOR CHAN Director Chan added that a pre-demolition meeting has been held between City staff and the applicant and that the applicant will soon begin demolition operations.
CITY MANAGER City Manager Miranda added that staff has visited the Reliance II site MIRANDA on several occasions and noted that Cal Fire has reached out to Trammel Crow to use the site as a staging area for upcoming rains.
He noted that staff has also taken photos of the operations at the site and has spoken to Cal Fire representatives.
MAYOR BURROLA Mayor Burrola asked how many times staff has visited the site, to which Director Chan advised that he has personally visited the site three times, and that Code Enforcement staff has also visited the site, all who have verified that the site is merely being used to store items for mudslide preparation.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 2025
SPECIAL MEETING PAGE 2
CITY MANAGER City Manager Miranda advised that staff has also taken photos of MIRANDA operations at the site.
MAYOR MIRANDA Mayor Miranda requested that staff visit the site periodically to make sure all is operating properly.
SUZANNE GOMEZ Suzanne Gomez thanked the City for diligently protecting city land and encouraged the Council to continue monitoring operations at the site. She also expressed appreciation for the support received from the City of Azusa, Senator Susan Rubio’s Office, and Supervisor Hilda Solis’ office.
“ERIC” Eric asked a follow-up question, to which City Manager Miranda reiterated that a demolition permit has already been issued for the site.
“KRIS M” A Zoom participant named Kris M asked which solutions the Council would offer regarding the toxic waste she stated is being transported from the Eaton Fire to Lario Park.
RECESS TO At 8:08 p.m., the City Council reconvened in Closed Session to CLOSED SESSION discuss the following:
Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation
Initiation of Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
Number of Cases: Two
ACTION: On the first case: information provided to the Council, direction provided to City Manager and City Attorney; no reportable action taken. On the second case: update and discussion provided to Council, discussion held; no direction provided and no action taken.
RECONVENE IN At 4:11 p.m., the City Council reconvened in Open Session with all OPEN SESSION members present except for Councilmember Breceda.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned at 4:12 p.m.
________________________________
Laura M. Nieto, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Payroll Batch 401-02-25, 402-02-25
DATE OF ISSUE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT
2/6/25
11 City Council 1,731.15
13 City Administrative Office 62,947.76
14 Finance Department 29,065.57
35 Police Department 229,425.13
40 Recreation Department 34,651.84
41 Aquatics Department 4,590.37
42 Senior Citizens' Center 19,315.31
44 Library 17,539.01
51 Planning & Community Development 28,964.88
52 Public Works - Engineering 33,613.04
57 Public Works - Services 54,994.31
Gross Payroll 516,838.37
Required Deductions (152,243.77)
Voluntary Deductions (24,012.25)
Net Payroll 340,582.35
Payroll Batch 413-02-25
DATE OF ISSUE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT
2/13/25
57 Public Works - Services 3,752.17
Gross Payroll 3,752.17
Required Deductions (1,001.66)
Voluntary Deductions -
Net Payroll 2,750.51
Payroll Batch 415-02-25, 416-02-25
DATE OF ISSUE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT
2/20/25
11 City Council 6,086.29
13 City Administrative Office 63,805.95
14 Finance Department 28,349.84
35 Police Department 213,938.48
40 Recreation Department 35,551.67
41 Aquatics Department 4,695.68
42 Senior Citizens' Center 19,446.38
44 Library 18,129.53
51 Planning & Community Development 29,244.37
52 Public Works - Engineering 34,854.62
57 Public Works - Services 52,884.89
Gross Payroll 506,987.70
Required Deductions (143,271.60)
Voluntary Deductions (25,598.36)
Net Payroll 338,117.74
Payroll Batch 421-02-25
DATE OF ISSUE DEPARTMENT AMOUNT
2/21/25
44 Library 257.38
Gross Payroll 257.38
Required Deductions (6.82)
Voluntary Deductions -
Net Payroll 250.56
CITY OF IRWINDALE
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER
February 2025
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
User:
Printed:
Accounts Payable
stapia
3/4/2025 3:29 PM
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
104190 ALVARE02 Isabel Alvarez 02/20/2025 75.00
104191 GARCI20 Sergio Garcia 02/20/2025 75.00
104192 OLIVAR03 Sandro Olivares 02/20/2025 253.55
104193 PAZ10 Cristina Paz 02/20/2025 75.00
104194 RODRIG37 Maribel Rodriguez 02/20/2025 75.00
104195 SIMG01 Simgel Co. Inc 02/20/2025 302,490.43
104196 SCE02 Southern California Edison 02/20/2025 674.75 104197 VIDA01 Michael Vidal 02/20/2025 200.00
104198 WEST20 Western Engineering Construction 02/20/2025 390.00 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (3/4/2025 3:29 PM) Page 1 104199 ZEPEDA07 Priscilla Zepeda 02/20/2025 295.46
Report Total (10 checks): 304,604.19
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
User:
Printed:
104201 CALIFO56 California State Disbursement Unit 02/20/2025 604.15 Accounts Payable
stapia
3/4/2025 3:38 PM
Check No Vendor No
CALIFO58 California State Disbursement Unit 02/20/2025 100.00 Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
FRANC06 Franchise Tax Board 02/20/2025 382.88
104202 CALIFO57 California State Disbursement Unit 02/20/2025 143.07 104203
IMEA Irwindale Mgmt Employee Assoc. 02/20/2025 540.00
104204 CITY01 City of Hope 02/20/2025 34.00
104205
LOSANG31 Los Angeles County Sheriff's Dept. 02/20/2025 104.77 104206 ICEA Irwindale City Employee Assoc. 02/20/2025 988.00 104207
PADILLAM Melissa Marez 02/20/2025 123.33
104208 IRWIND02 Irwindale Police Officers Assoc. 02/20/2025 3,033.00 104209
ACCO01 ACCO Engineering Systems 02/27/2025 1,420.00
104210 LOPEZ16 Kim Lopez 02/20/2025 300.00
104211
AMERIC34 American Fidelity Assurance Co 02/27/2025 6,269.70 104212 ZEPEDA03 Belen Zepeda 02/26/2025 1,086.77
104213
CINGULAR AT & T Mobility 02/27/2025 1,801.36
104214 ALLIAN02 Alliant Insurance Svcs, Inc.- Irvine Main 02/27/2025 329.00 104215
ATHENS Athens Services 02/27/2025 6,049.43
104216 AT&T06 AT & T 02/27/2025 3,455.78
104217
AZUSALW Azusa Light & Water 02/27/2025 278.18
104218 CINGULAR AT & T Mobility 02/27/2025 43.47
104219
MIJACA Balcon Holdings, Inc. 02/27/2025 222.00
104220 AZBUS01 A-Z Bus Sales 02/27/2025 310.20
104221
CITYTEC0 City Tech Solutions, Inc. 02/27/2025 41,000.00 104222 BAKER01 Baker & Taylor Books 02/27/2025 85.01
104223
DEPTOF02 County of LA Dept of Animal Care & Control 02/27/2025 4,405.66 104224 CHRIS Chris Nelson & Assocites, Inc. 02/27/2025 39,600.00 104225
CUMMINS Cummins-Allison Corp 02/27/2025 497.10
104226 CONCE01 Concentra 02/27/2025 61.00
104227
FRONT01 Frontier Communications 02/27/2025 43.23
104228 CSG01 CSG Consultants 02/27/2025 437.50
104229
HDL01 Hdl Software, LLC 02/27/2025 34.56
104230 EBSCOS EBSCO Information Services 02/27/2025 2,168.00 104231
INTELL01 Intelli-tech, Inc. 02/27/2025 51,899.10
104232 FRONT01 Frontier Communications 02/27/2025 459.95 104233
COORYE Samir M. Khoury 02/27/2025 9,085.50
104234 HOMEDE Home Depot Credit Services 02/27/2025 377.69 104235
LG2WB01 LG2WB Engineers, Inc 02/27/2025 1,356.00
104236 IRWIND21 Irwindale Hand Wash & Auto Detail 02/27/2025 423.87 104237
LOUIS01 Jason Louis 02/27/2025 1,131.73
104238 KING01 King of the Crowns 02/27/2025 410.76
104239
MIDAS Manuel C Muratalla 02/27/2025 996.09
104240 LIEBERT Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 02/27/2025 1,665.00 104241
OFFICE03 ODP Business Solutions, LLC 02/27/2025 1,412.23 104242 MAINTE01 Maintex 02/27/2025 265.86
104243
PITNEY06 Pitney Bowes, Inc 02/27/2025 238.14
104244 MOUNT01 MNRO Holdings, LLC 02/27/2025 150.55
104245
104246 PERF01 Performa Labs, Inc. 02/27/2025 6,000.00
104247
SANCH01 Jaycon Sanchez 02/27/2025 151.55
SEMA02 SEMA INC 02/27/2025 5,891.05
104248 PURCHA Purchase Power 02/27/2025 1,993.86
104249
SHARP02 Sharpline Solutions, Inc. 02/27/2025 754.11
104250 SCFUELS SC Fuels 02/27/2025 5,349.69
104251
STGEO01 St. George's Medical Clinic 02/27/2025 745.00
104252 SEMA01 SEMA LLC 02/27/2025 459.23
104253
YTIRES Y Tire Sales 02/27/2025 50.00
104254 SIERRA11 Sierra Monrovia Chevrolet, LLC 02/27/2025 539.85 104255
AMBRIZ05 Albert Ambriz 02/27/2025 48.86
104256 WESTCO11 West Coast Lights & Sirens 02/27/2025 186,311.03 104257
OROSCO05 Rebecca Bardales 02/27/2025 292.72
104258 ALLIAN02 Alliant Insurance Svcs, Inc.- Irvine Main 02/27/2025 1,586.00 104259
BENE01 Benefit Coordinators Corp 02/27/2025 17,146.30
104260 AMERIFID American Fidelity Assurance 02/27/2025 10,427.72 104261
PMIDEN Delta Dental Insurance Company 02/27/2025 602.80 104262 BENE02 Benefit Coordinator Corporation (BCC) 02/27/2025 3,403.95 104263
IRWIND04 Irwindale Chamber Of Commerce 02/27/2025 150.00 104264 NEST01 ReadyRefresh, Blue Triton Brands, Inc. 02/27/2025 3,897.81 104265
OPTUM01 OptumRx, Inc. 02/27/2025 33,039.56
104266 DURAN06 Michelle Duran 02/27/2025 300.00
104267
GASCOM SoCalGas 02/27/2025 708.68
104268 JONES02 Brandi Jones 02/27/2025 194.38
104269
STATEO01 State Of California 02/27/2025 98.00
104270 SANG10 San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership 02/27/2025 7,000.00 104271
VARGAS03 Jose Vargas 02/27/2025 49.32
104272 SCE02 Southern California Edison 02/27/2025 15,166.92 104273
BARNEY Barney's Locksmith Service 03/06/2025 22.88
104274 STROBE03 Gary Strobehn 02/27/2025 454.39
104275
ALLCI01 All City Management Services, Inc 03/06/2025 977.67 104276 VISION01 Vision Service Plan - (CA) 02/27/2025 1,802.85 104277
AZBUS01 A-Z Bus Sales 03/06/2025 69.77
104278 ACCO01 ACCO Engineering Systems 03/06/2025 2,556.00 104279
CALIFO42 California Building Standards 03/06/2025 1,395.90 104280 ALLIAN02 Alliant Insurance Svcs, Inc.- Irvine Main 03/06/2025 297.00 104281
CHRIS Chris Nelson & Assocites, Inc. 03/06/2025 3,125.00 104282 B&BTIR B & B Tires Service 03/06/2025 60.00
104283
BALDWI02 City of Baldwin Park 03/06/2025 525.00
104284 CALIFO25 California Library Association 03/06/2025 195.00 104285
COSTA01 Costar Realty Information, Inc. 03/06/2025 438.90 104286 CINTAS Cintas Corporation #693 03/06/2025 139.03 104287
COUNTY04 County of Los Angeles 03/06/2025 6,648.56
104288 CITYOF23 City Of West Covina 03/06/2025 20,700.00 104289
CREN01 Crenshaw Wholesale Electric Supply 03/06/2025 23,979.38 104290 DEPTOF02 County of LA Dept of Animal Care & Control 03/06/2025 9,689.42 104291
DEMCOI Demco, Inc. 03/06/2025 354.85
104292 CPG01 CPG Event Rentals LLC 03/06/2025 600.96
104293
FEDEX FedEx 03/06/2025 154.29
104294 CWE01 CWE 03/06/2025 3,825.50
104295
GEOLOG Geologic Associates 03/06/2025 93,973.95
104296 DUDEK01 Dudek 03/06/2025 6,815.00
104297
HOYEN Noelle Hoye 03/06/2025 490.00
104298 FLAGSH Flag Shop 03/06/2025 616.57
104299
IMEG01 IMEG Consultants Corp. 03/06/2025 15,016.50
104300 HART02 Robert Hartman 03/06/2025 600.00
104301
104302 ILLINO01 Illinois Library Association 03/06/2025 541.74 104303
104304 IRWIND04 Irwindale Chamber Of Commerce 03/06/2025 11,300.00
LANCES Lance, Soll & Lunghard LLP 03/06/2025 4,503.00
MCA01 MCA Direct LLC 03/06/2025 426.10
104305
OFFICE03 ODP Business Solutions, LLC 03/06/2025 274.69
104306 MIDAS Manuel C Muratalla 03/06/2025 661.13
104307
ORKINP Orkin Pest Control 03/06/2025 135.00
104308 MOTOR02 Motorola Solutions 03/06/2025 1,864.28
104309
RIGHT01 Right of Way, Inc. 03/06/2025 1,512.69
104310 OPTUM01 OptumRx, Inc. 03/06/2025 32,439.08
104311
SULLYM Sully-Miller Contracting Co. 03/06/2025 23,142.70 104312 PROPRINT Pro Printing, Inc. 03/06/2025 55.75
104313
VISION01 Vision Service Plan - (CA) 03/06/2025 3,343.70 104314 GASCOM SoCalGas 03/06/2025 1,799.20
104315
YTIRES Y Tire Sales 03/06/2025 30.00
104316 TAB01 TAB Products Co. LLC 03/06/2025 525.00
104317
Report Total (119 checks): 769,378.94
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (3/4/2025 3:38 PM) Page 3 104318 WILLDAN Willdan Financial Services 03/06/2025 3,118.50 104319
February 2025
Reference
Number Vendor Name Date Amount
ACH US Bank 2/11/2025 27,928.92
Report Total: 27,928.92
Electronic Payments
February 1 - 28, 2025
Item #19.C.
Date: March 12, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Julian A. Miranda, City Manager
Issue: Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan
City Manager's Recommendation:
City Manager’s Recommendation : That the City Council consider the Planning Commission’s Resolutions Nos. 834(24), 835(24), 836(24), 837(24), and 838(24) recommending the City Council certify the FEIR and approve the proposed Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan and associated entitlements; and:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-01-3589, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE city council of the CITY OF IRWINDALE (1) CERTIFYing THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, STATE CLEARING HOUSE (SCH# 2023020290); (2) ADOPTing THE FINDINGS REQUIRED BY CEQA GUIDELINES, SECTION 15091; (3) ADOPTing THE PROPOSED MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; AND (4) ADOPTing A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS,
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR THE IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN”;
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-02-3590, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE city council OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE AMENDing THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT AND LAND USE PLAN MAP OF THE CITY’S GENERAL PLAN (GPA NO. 02-2022) FROM REGIONAL COMMERCIAL TO SPECIFIC PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 LIVE OAK LANE, IRWINDALE, CA (APNs: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-047) AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF”;
3. Introduce Ordinance No. 787, entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 02-2023 to add irwindale gateway SPECIFIC PLAN to title 17 of the irwindale municipal code (imc), DEFINING permitted uses, regulating the sizes and locations of buildings, specifying design GUIDELINES and development standards, addressing mobility and connectivity topics, identifying project infrastructure and services, and providing administrative and implementation language for property located at 13620 live oak lane, irwindale, ca (APNs: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-047) AND FINDING THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2023020290)”;
4. Introduce Ordinance No. 788, entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE MODIFYING THE CITY OF IRWINDALE ZONING MAP (ZONE CHANGE NO. 02-2022) FROM M-2 (HEAVY MANUFACTURING) TO IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN for property located at 13620 LIVE OAK LANE, IRWINDALE, CA (APNs: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-047) AND FINDING THE PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2023020290)”; and
5. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-05-3593, entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE city council of the city of irwindale APPROVing TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 83854 TO CREATE SEVEN (7) PARCELS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 LIVE OAK LANE, IRWINDALE, CA (APNS: 8532-002-046 AND 8532-002-04) in the M-2 (HEAVY Manufacturing) Zone SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH HEREIN, MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.”
Administrative Action:
Submitted by:
Marilyn Simpson, AICP, Community Development Director
Prepared by:
Brandi Jones, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:
Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney
Kambiz Borhani, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Approved by:
Julian A. Miranda, City Manager
Background and Analysis:
REQUEST
On February 26, 2025, the City Council made a substitute motion to reconsider Option 2 in the proposed Specific Plan document. They directed Staff to revise the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan document to restore all references of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), and accompanying Resolutions and Ordinances.
On January 22, 2025, the City Council continued this item to the February 26, 2025 City Council meeting to be on the Consent Calendar. They directed Staff to revise the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan document to remove all references to Battery Energy Storage Systems
(BESS), and accompanying Resolutions and Ordinances. A redlined version of the Specific Plan document, dated February 20, 2025, was provided which showed a red strikethrough of deleted text and underline for new text. A clean version of the Specific Plan document, dated February 20, 2025, was also provided where all strikethrough and added text have been deleted and was an exhibit of Ordinance No. 787.
The attached version of the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan includes the following changes from Legal Counsel and the Planning Commission:
Legal Counsel (January 8, 2025)
• Page 36 – Add additional notes to Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) line item.
Existing: Shall be subject to the Irwindale Municipal Code chapter regarding BESS for standards not specified in the Specific Plan. Development shall be limited to the area identified as BESS Area on Figure 4-2.
Proposed: Shall be subject to the Irwindale Municipal Code chapter regarding BESS for standards not specified in the Specific Plan. Development shall be limited to the area identified as BESS Area on Figure 4-2.
The Development Agreement shall comply with any applicable laws or ordinances in effect at the time of Development Agreement approval.
• Page 88 - Add additional language regarding the implementation of Specific Plan.
Existing: Implementation of development within the Development Area shall be subject to City approval of lot line adjustments, site plan review, plot plans, subdivision reviews, building permits, and other planning approvals and permits that may be required by the City of Irwindale pursuant to the Specific Plan or the City of Irwindale Municipal Code. The implementation process described herein provides the procedures for review and approval of development within the Specific Plan Area.
Proposed: Implementation of development within the Development Area shall be subject to City approval of lot line adjustments, site plan review, plot plans, subdivision reviews, building permits, and other planning approvals and permits that may be required by the City of Irwindale pursuant to the Specific Plan or the City of Irwindale Municipal Code, including compliance with any applicable development standards whether set forth herein or in the City of Irwindale Municipal Code. The implementation process described herein provides the procedures for review and approval of development within the Specific Plan Area.
Planning Commission (November 14, 2024)
• Page 34 – Remove “Asphalt Plants” from the use matrix.
• Page 44 – Revise the language as follows:
Existing: A Spanish contemporary influence is desired throughout the Development Area. All design elements of Buildings shall be compatible (but not identical) in character, massing, and materials in order to promote a clean and contemporary style.
Proposed: A Spanish contemporary influence is desired required throughout the Development Area. All design elements of Buildings shall be compatible (but not identical) in character, massing, and materials in order to promote a clean and contemporary style.
In addition to the revised Specific Plan document, Resolution No. 2025-05-3593 was revised to remove Condition of Approval No. B.11, which referenced BESS. Condition of Approval No.
B.11 will be reinstated and reads as follows:
B.11 – BESS shall be screened with an 8’-0” high wall where in sight of proximal portions of Live Oak Avenue or Live Oak Lane at Specific Plan build-out.
Fiscal Impact:
None
Attachments:
1. Attachment A: Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan CC 03122025
2. Attachment B: CC Resolution No. 2025-01-3589 FEIR SOC MMRP 03122025 FINAL
3. CC Resolution No. 2025-01-3589 FEIR SOC MMRP EXHIBIT A
4. CC Resolution No. 2025-01-3589 FEIR SOC MMRP EXHIBIT B (FOFSOC)
5. Irwindale Gateway FOF SOC FINAL 10142024
6. CC Resolution No. 2025-01-3589 FEIR SOC MMRP EXHIBIT C (MMRP)
7. Irwindale Gateway MMRP_Final Corrected ToCity 10_23_24
8. Attachment C: CC Resolution No. 2025-02-3590 GPA No. 02-2022 with Land Use Map 03122025 FINAL
9. Attachment D: Ordinance No. 787 ZOA 02-2023 03122025 FINAL
10. Attachment E: Ordinance No. 788 ZC 02-2022 03122025 FINAL
11. Attachment F: CC Resolution No. 2025-05-3593 TPM 83854 03122025 FINAL
IRWINDALE GATEWAY
SPECIFIC PLAN
CITY OF IRWINDALE – MARCH 12, 2025
PREPARED BY
SAGECREST PLANNING+ENVIRONMENTAL
EXHIBIT “A”
1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 2
1.1 OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................................................................................2
1.2 BACKGROUND..........................................................................................................................................................2
1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC PLAN CONTENTS....................................................................................................................3
1.4 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC PLAN AREA...........................................................................................................................4
1.5 SPECIFIC PLAN ORGANIZATION ....................................................................................................................................7
2. PURPOSE AND INTENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN......................................................................................................8
2.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT ...............................................................................................................................................8
2.2 SPECIFIC PLAN AUTHORITY .........................................................................................................................................8
2.3 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................9
3. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS..................................................................................... 11
3.1 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ...................................................................................................................................11
3.2 RELATIONSHIP TO ZONING CODE................................................................................................................................16
3.3 SUBDIVISIONS ........................................................................................................................................................17
4. LAND USE .................................................................................................................................................... 19
4.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS .............................................................................................................................................19
4.2 SUMMARY OF LAND USE PLAN..................................................................................................................................19
5. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION ......................................................................................................... 23
5.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT .............................................................................................................................................23
5.2 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION .........................................................................................................................................23
5.3 NON-VEHICULAR CIRCULATION .................................................................................................................................29
6. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ........................................................................................................................ 33
6.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT .............................................................................................................................................33
6.2 DEFINITIONS..........................................................................................................................................................33
6.3 PERMITTED USES....................................................................................................................................................34
6.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS PARK .......................................................................................36
6.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS..................................................................................39
6.5.1 Other Development Standards (BESS)........................................................................................................41
6.6 LANDSCAPE ...........................................................................................................................................................41
7. DESIGN GUIDELINES .................................................................................................................................... 44
7.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT .............................................................................................................................................44
7.2 APPLICABILITY........................................................................................................................................................44
7.3 SITE PLANNING ......................................................................................................................................................44
7.4 BUILDING ARCHITECTURE.........................................................................................................................................45
7.4.1 Architectural Design...................................................................................................................................45
7.4.2 Building Form.............................................................................................................................................45
7.4.3 Building Materials, Colors, and Textures....................................................................................................50
7.4.4 Windows and Doors...................................................................................................................................52
7.4.5 Functional Elements...................................................................................................................................52
7.5 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ......................................................................................................................................54
7.5.1 Plant Palette...............................................................................................................................................57
7.5.2 Entry Treatments and Project Identification ..............................................................................................58
7.5.3 Streetscapes...............................................................................................................................................67
7.6 FENCES AND WALLS ................................................................................................................................................70
7.7 LIGHTING..............................................................................................................................................................74
8. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................................................................... 76
8.1 WATER.................................................................................................................................................................76
8.2 SANITARY SEWER....................................................................................................................................................76
8.3 STORM WATER DRAINAGE .......................................................................................................................................76
8.4 DRY UTILITIES ........................................................................................................................................................77
9. IMPLEMENTATION....................................................................................................................................... 88
9.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................88
9.2 SEVERABILITY.........................................................................................................................................................88
9.3 INTERPRETATIONS AND DETERMINATIONS ....................................................................................................................88
9.4 SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW ................................................................................................................................88
9.5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS .....................................................................................................................................88
9.6 MINOR VARIANCE ..................................................................................................................................................89
9.7 AMENDMENTS TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN.........................................................................................................................89
9.8 SUBDIVISION .........................................................................................................................................................89
9.9 FINANCING OF DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPMENT AREA..................................................................................................89
9.10 MAINTENANCE PLAN ............................................................................................................................................89
9.11 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ..............................................................................................................91
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION
1 INTRODUCTION I.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION
2 1. Introduc�on
1.1 Overview
The Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”) provides a comprehensive land use program to guide the development of an approximately 66.64-acre property in the City of Irwindale, California.
The Specific Plan covers an approximately 52.65-acre developable por�on (the “Development Area”) and 13.99 acres of undevelopable area (SCE easement and roadway dedica�ons). The Specific Plan land use concept features an industrial business park with up to 997,796 square feet of building space and a number of u�lity-scale batery energy storage system facili�es. The Development Area is envisioned as a place where industrial businesses can thrive and encourage further economic investment in the City of Irwindale (the “City”). Its contemporary design will enhance the visual quality of the currently vacant site.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, any improvements shown on the figures contained herein are conceptual and for illustra�ve purposes only, and it shall not be a requirement that improvements be located, designed, or constructed as shown on such figures.
1.2 Background
The Development Area is the site of a former quarry. In the late 1980’s, quarry ac�vi�es ceased, and the site was designated for reclama�on as required by the State Surface Mining and Reclama�on Act of 1975 (SMARA). On December 15, 1994, the City adopted Resolu�on 94-55-1381, approving a condi�onal use permit authorizing the opera�on of an inert landfill to “fill and restore the depleted gravel pit.” In connec�on with the approval, the City prepared and cer�fied an Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 88060819, and adopted a related Statement of Overriding Considera�ons. Addi�onally, there are three exis�ng billboards on the site. An approved grading plan was issued on September 16, 2022 to fix previous inert material that had been improperly placed.
The inert debris remedial grading opera�on is bringing the site back to produc�ve use with geotechnically cer�fied fill.
3 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION
Figure 1-1 – Site Photo
1.3 Descrip�on of Specific Plan Contents
This Specific Plan guides development of the Development Area by se�ng forth a land use plan, transporta�on and circula�on plan, infrastructure plans, development standards, and design guidelines that address building placement, architectural style, landscaping, and other design elements. The substan�ve design elements of the buildings create visual interest, unity, and compa�bility through the treatment of exterior building materials, colors, and façades as well as building placement, massing, and scale. In addi�on, a cohesive landscaping program will provide pleasing views of the Development Area from on- and off-site loca�ons. Altogether, the various elements of the built environment in the Development Area will enhance the visual quality of the site and create an atrac�ve development within the City.
From a long-term opera�onal perspec�ve, the Specific Plan accommodates industrial, and business park, and batery energy storage uses. These types of uses serve to encourage economic investment, jobs, and business opportuni�es in the City of Irwindale and assist in maintaining sustained economic stability and growth.
4 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION
1.4 Descrip�on of Specific Plan Area
As shown on Figure 1-2, Vicinity Map, the Specific Plan area is located in the western por�on of the City of Irwindale, immediately east of I-605, north of Live Oak Avenue and south of Arrow Highway.
The City of Baldwin Park is located to the southeast. The I-605 Freeway forms the western boundary of the Specific Plan Area with the I-605/Live Oak Avenue interchange located immediately southwest of the Specific Plan Area and the I-605/Arrow Highway interchange located immediately northwest of the Specific Plan Area.
As shown on Figure 1-3, Aerial Photograph, surrounding land uses include the Southern California Edison Rio Hondo Sub-sta�on, located on the south side of Live Oak Avenue, and the Santa Fe Dam Flood Control Basin, located on the north side of Arrow Highway. The land located east of the Specific Plan Area is used for industrial purposes. Access to the Specific Plan Area is provided through an established local roadway network. The Development Area is within walking distance (half mile) of the nearest Foothill Transit bus stop (Line 492) on Live Oak Avenue and Stewart Avenue.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION
FIGURE 1-2 – VICINITY MAP 5
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION
FIGURE 1-3 – AERIAL PHOTGRAPH 6
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN I. INTRODUCTION
7 1.5 Specific Plan Organiza�on
This Specific Plan is organized into the following sec�ons:
Sec�on 1 – Introduc�on
Sec�on 2 – Purpose and Intent of Specific Plan
Sec�on 3 – Rela�onship to Other Land Use Regula�ons
Sec�on 4 – Land Use
Sec�on 5 – Transporta�on and Circula�on
Sec�on 6 – Development Standards
Sec�on 7 – Design Guidelines
Sec�on 8 – U�lity Infrastructure Plan
Sec�on 9 – Implementa�on
Unless otherwise defined in this Specific Plan, the meaning of capitalized words, phrases, �tles, and terms shall be the same as provided in the City of Irwindale Municipal Code and the City of Irwindale Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN II.PURPOSE AND INTENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN 7 Purpose and Intent of Specific Plan II.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN II.PURPOSE AND INTENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN 8 2. Purpose and Intent of Specific Plan
2.1 Purpose and Intent
This Specific Plan, adopted by ordinance, establishes the development regula�ons, allowable land uses, design guidelines, and implementa�on procedures for the Development Area. The Specific Plan establishes the effec�ve zoning for the Development Area. In addi�on, circula�on and other infrastructure improvements such as water, wastewater, and stormwater drainage systems are addressed by this Specific Plan to ensure their proper sizing and �mely installa�on.
2.2 Specific Plan Authority
This Specific Plan is a regulatory document prepared pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code §§ 65450 through 65457, which grant local government agencies the authority to prepare specific plans for the systema�c implementa�on of their general plan for all or part of the area covered by the general plan.
California Government Code §§ 65450 through 65457 establish the authority to adopt a specific plan, iden�fy the required contents of a specific plan, and mandate consistency with the general plan.
According to California Government Code § 65451:
(a) A specific plan shall include text and a diagram or diagrams which specify all of the following in detail:
(1) The distribu�on, loca�on, and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan.
(2) The proposed distribu�on, loca�on, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transporta�on, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essen�al facili�es proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan. (3) Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conserva�on, development, and u�liza�on of natural resources, where applicable. (4) A program of implementa�on measures including regula�ons, programs, public works projects, and financing measures, necessary to carry out items (1), (2), and (3) (b) The specific plan shall include a statement of the rela�onship of the specific plan to the general plan.
This Specific Plan includes each of the required elements listed above and establishes the essen�al link for how the Specific Plan is consistent with the policies of the City of Irwindale General Plan (the “General Plan”). The Specific Plan provides the City of Irwindale’s staff and decision makers, as well as developers, investors, the community at-large, u�lity providers, public service districts, and others with a comprehensive plan establishing regula�ons, condi�ons, and programs for guiding the systema�c development of the Development Area. All future development plans and implemen�ng
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN II.PURPOSE AND INTENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN 9 ac�ons within the Development Area are required to be consistent with the regula�ons set forth in this Specific Plan and with all other applicable City, County, State, and federal regula�ons.
2.3 Statement of Objec�ves
To ensure the functional integrity, economic viability, and positive aesthetic appearance of the Development Area, the following planning and development goals are established:
Create a comprehensive land use plan for the re-use of a reclaimed sand and gravel quarry including the development of u�lity scale batery energy storage facili�es. Provide guidelines and standards for the development of state-of-the-art buildings that can accommodate various industrial and manufacturing uses, including warehouse distribu�on, logis�cs, and fulfillment centers with proximate access to Interstate 605 on- and off-ramps. Ensure that infrastructure plans for water, sewer, drainage, dry u�lity, and solid waste disposal are adequately designed for the Specific Plan. Provide a circula�on system that meets transporta�on requirements and minimizes poten�al adverse impacts on the surrounding area.
Provide guidelines and standards for architecture, landscaping, walls, fencing, ligh�ng, and entry treatments that are compa�ble with the design and architecture of the surrounding uses.
10 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III.RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS III. Rela�onship to other Land Use
Regula�ons
11 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III.RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS
3. Rela�onship to Other Land Use
Regula�ons
California Government Code § 65454 requires a specific plan to be consistent with the local General Plan. As part of the adop�on of this Specific Plan, a General Plan Amendment changes the General Plan land use designa�on for the Specific Plan Area from “Regional Commercial” to “Specific Plan”, and a Zoning Ordinance Amendment changes the zoning designa�on for the Specific Plan Area from “M2 (Heavy Manufacturing)” to “Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan”. The adop�on of this Specific Plan establishes the zoning regula�ons for the Specific Plan Area in order to implement the Geneal Plan land use designa�on of “Specific Plan” for the Specific Plan Area.
The Specific Plan provides for a land use plan and development standards, which reflect the objec�ves in Sec�on 2, governing development of the principal physical components of the Development Area, including, but not limited to: buildings, batery energy storage systems, circula�on and parking facili�es, landscaping, open space, and u�lity improvements. The Specific Plan provides for the standards that establish the general type, parameters, and character of development with the goal of crea�ng an integrated and unified environment that is compa�ble with its surrounding area. The Specific Plan also provides a plan for infrastructure improvements to serve the Development Area including the development of a new deten�on basin within the SCE Easement Area for collec�on of project storm water flows. The deten�on basin will replace an exis�ng, unimproved natural reten�on basin located within the SCE Easement Area.
3.1 General Plan Consistency
The Specific Plan is designed to meet the goals established in the City’s General Plan by providing a framework for the future development of the Development Area. The Specific Plan is designed to be consistent with, and serves as an extension of, the City’s General Plan. The Specific Plan is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use Element policies and objec�ves:
GENERAL PLAN POLICY SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT (CDE)
Issue Area – Land Use Planning: The City of Irwindale is committed to the development of a comprehensive land use plan that will enhance the City’s livability and economic base for future generations.
CDE Policy 1: The City of Irwindale, through
con�nued comprehensive land use planning,
will strive to preserve the overall mix of land
uses and development in the community.
The Specific Plan is consistent with the City’s
goal of preserving the overall mix of land uses
and development in the community by se�ng
forth a land use plan and development
regula�ons for how the reclaimed former quarry
located in the Development Area will
accommodate industrial and business park uses,
including batery energy storage systems.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS 12 CDE Policy 2: The City of Irwindale will con�nue
to plan for the transi�on of the quarries located
within the City to other land uses.
The Development Area is a remediated former
quarry. The Specific Plan allows the transi�on of
the site to a produc�ve and economically
beneficial development for the City of Irwindale.
CDE Policy 3: The City of Irwindale will con�nue
to ensure that the type, loca�on, and intensity
of all new development and intensified
developments adhere to the requirements that
are specified for their par�cular land use
category in the General Plan.
The Specific Plan provides a development plan,
infrastructure plans, development standards,
and design guidelines that address building
placement, architectural style, landscaping, and
other design elements to address the specific
characteris�cs of the site consistent with the
General Plan land use designa�on of Specific
Plan.
CDE Policy 5: The City of Irwindale will con�nue
to promote comprehensive development
consistent with the General Plan as opposed to
piecemeal and incremental planning.
The Specific Plan implements policies set forth
in the General Plan by providing a
comprehensive plan and direc�on for the longterm development of the Development Area.
The Specific Plan provides for implementa�on of
uniform development regula�ons and design
guidelines and addresses sustainable prac�ces,
to promote compa�bility with surrounding
areas. Adop�on of the Specific Plan provides for
the comprehensive development of the
Development Area, thereby avoiding planning of
piecemeal development.
Issue Area – Economic Development: The City of Irwindale intends to continue its pursuit and promotion of economic development that will provide jobs and revenue for the community.
CDE Policy 10: The City of Irwindale will promote
development that will benefit the community as
a whole in terms of both jobs and revenue
genera�on.
The Specific Plan allows for up to 997,796 square
feet of industrial and business park uses on a
former quarry site. Revenue benefits to the City
of Irwindale may include but not be limited to
increased property tax revenue and point-ofsale tax revenue. In addi�on, the Specific Plan will allow for development of uses leading to
crea�on of jobs that can be filled by residents of
the City and surrounding communi�es.
Issue Area – Urban Design: The City of Irwindale will continue its efforts in improving the appearance of the community.
CDE Policy 12: The City of Irwindale will con�nue
to promote quality design in the review and
approval of commercial and industrial
development through the applica�on of the
commercial and industrial design guidelines.
The Specific Plan promotes quality design by
providing guidelines and standards for
landscaping, architecture, walls, fencing,
signage, ligh�ng, and entry treatments
addressing the specific character of the site and
proposed uses to maintain compa�bility with
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS 13 the design and architecture of the surrounding
uses.
CDE Policy 14: The City of Irwindale will con�nue
to promote property maintenance in all areas of
the City.
The Specific Plan defines the en��es responsible
for maintenance of publicly and privately-owned
improvements within the Specific Plan Area,
including roadways and u�lity infrastructure
(refer to Sec�on 9.10 and Table 9-1). Compliance
with the Specific Plan’s maintenance program
ensures that all improvements within the
Specific Plan Area are properly and perpetually
maintained.
CDE Policy 16: The City of Irwindale will con�nue
to work towards the development of
streetscape, sign standards, and a Public Art
Program.
The Design Guidelines for the Specific Plan (refer
to Sec�on 7) establish comprehensive
streetscape design standards for the Irwindale
Gateway Specific Plan’s frontage on Arrow
Highway, Live Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane
promo�ng a welcoming visual environment for
employees, visitors, and passersby. Signage will
conform to City standards.
INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (IE)
Issue Area – Maintenance of Service Standards: City of Irwindale will continue to maintain the highest levels of public service to respond to the existing and future demand for such services.
IE Policy 1: The City will con�nue to support
the efforts of the City of Irwindale Public
Works Department in maintaining the highest
service standards feasible.
IE Policy 2: The City will con�nue to cooperate
with those u�lity providers in the City to
ensure that sufficient infrastructure capacity
is available to meet current and future service
demands.
The Specific Plan requires improvements to be
made to roadways and public
u�li�es/infrastructure in conjunc�on with
future development of the Development Area
and as required by the City of Irwindale and
applicable public service providers.
Improvements are required to be made by the
developers as necessary to serve the
Development Area while maintaining adequate
service levels for exis�ng surrounding land
uses. Plans for water, sewer, storm water, dry
u�li�es, and solid waste disposal are provided
in Sec�on 8, U�lity Infrastructure.
Issue Area – Traffic and Circulation: The City of Irwindale will strive to improve safe and efficient circulation in the City.
IE Policy 3: The City of Irwindale will con�nue
to develop and enhance the exis�ng streets
and intersec�ons in the City.
IE Policy 4: The City of Irwindale will strive to
ensure that all new development implements
its “fair-share” of infrastructure
The Specific Plan includes roadway and
sidewalk improvement plans to facilitate
efficient vehicular and non-vehicular
transporta�on through and around the
Development Area. With implementa�on of the
circula�on improvements iden�fied in Sec�on 5
of the Specific Plan, traffic impacts generated
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS 14 improvements to offset the poten�al adverse
impacts associated with the addi�onal traffic
that will be generated by the new
development.
by development in the Development Area will
be offset to the City of Irwindale’s sa�sfac�on.
Furthermore, developers of land within the
Development Area will be responsible for
funding and/or construc�on of the required
infrastructure improvements as set forth by the
Specific Plan.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (RME)
Issue Area – Natural Resources. The City of Irwindale will continue to cooperate in the maintenance and conservation of the area‘s natural resources.
RME Policy 1: The City of Irwindale will
con�nue to work with the quarries and other
regulatory agencies to facilitate their
reclama�on.
RME Policy 3: The City of Irwindale will work
with the quarry owners and/or operators and
regulatory agencies to help facilitate their
�mely reclama�on.
The Development Area is a former quarry site,
which is the subject of an ongoing inert debris
remedial grading opera�on being conducted to
return the site to produc�ve use. This Specific
Plan provides guidelines and development
standards for the redevelopment of the site. As
such, the Specific Plan provides a
comprehensive plan for the transi�on of the
site to a produc�ve and economically beneficial
development for the City of Irwindale.
Issue Area – Resource Preservation. The City of Irwindale will maintain and preserve those natural and man-made amenities that contribute to the City‘s livability.
RME Policy 11: The City of Irwindale supports
the ethic of conserva�on of non-renewable
resources. This includes efforts to reduce the
use of energy (in any form), greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions (consistent with AB 32) and
efforts to find new and more energy efficient
methods for delivering services. The City
supports the development of building
standards that enable the community to
design energy saving features such as solar
energy systems, water efficient landscaping,
and sustainable, green, and energy efficient
building standards.
The Specific Plan allows industrial land uses
adjacent to Interstate 605 and approximately
1.8 miles from Interstate 210. By its loca�on
near major transporta�on corridors, the
Specific Plan has the poten�al to reduce vehicle
miles traveled, which would reduce tailpipe
emissions – a major source of greenhouse
gases. In addi�on, buildings in the
Development Area will be required to comply
with the California Green Building Standards
Code, the City’s Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), and will
incorporate addi�onal sustainable design
features that minimize water use and maximize
energy efficiency. The Specific Plan also
includes allowance for incorpora�on of one or
more BESS (as hereina�er defined) facili�es,
thereby providing opportunity for high-value
infrastructure that would allow for more use of
sustainable renewable energy resources that
will help to reduce GHG emissions as
conven�onal energy genera�on sources are
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS 15 phased out.
Issue Area – Mining and Reclamation. The following policies focus on those City policy actions that can be taken to improve environmental compliance, reclamation planning, and long-term economic improvement of the mines and quarries (inactive, active, and reclaimed) in Irwindale.
RME Policy 19: The City of Irwindale will
consider environmental jus�ce issues as they
are related to poten�al health impacts
associated with air pollu�on and ensure that
all land use decisions, including enforcement
ac�ons, are made in an equitable fashion to
protect residents, regardless of age, culture,
ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status,
or geographic loca�on from the health effects
of air pollu�on.
The Development Area is a former quarry that
was filled improperly with inert debris and
reclaimed beginning in 2023. Air pollu�on
emissions historically associated with mining
and filling have ceased and air pollutant
emissions associated with development of the
Specific Plan would be generated primarily by
mobile sources (tailpipe emissions from
vehicles traveling to and from the property).
These air pollutant emissions are regulated at
the federal and State levels through mandated
vehicle engine performance standards and fuel
content requirements. The Development Area
is surrounded by flood control uses to the north
and east, the Southern California Edison Rio
Hondo sub-sta�on to the south, and Interstate
605 and quarry uses to the west. As such, there
are no known or probable environmental
jus�ce issues associated with developing the
Specific Plan land uses.
RME Policy 25: The City of Irwindale will
monitor traffic and conges�on to determine
when and where the City needs new
transporta�on facili�es to achieve increased
mobility efficiency.
The Specific Plan requires roadway and
sidewalk improvements for new developments
to facilitate efficient vehicular and nonvehicular transporta�on through and around the Development Area. The Specific Plan
provides for required roadway improvements,
including to the north side of Live Oak Avenue
and Live Oak Lane. Transporta�on and roadway
improvements iden�fied in Sec�on 5 of this
Specific Plan ensure that the segments of Live
Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane adjacent to the
Development Area will operate at an
acceptable service level.
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT (PSE)
Issue Area – Emergency Preparedness. The City of Irwindale will strive to maintain the highest levels of readiness to respond to disasters or local emergencies.
PSE Policy 3: The City of Irwindale will work to
reduce poten�al hazards through
conscien�ous land use planning. The City shall
require liquefac�on assessment studies as
The Development Area is the site of a reclaimed
former quarry. The inert debris deposited at the
property during the reclama�on process
consists of a combina�on of crushed rock, fine
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS 16 part of development proposals in areas
iden�fied by the California Geological Survey
as suscep�ble to liquefac�on. The studies
shall be conducted in accordance with the
California Geological Survey’s Special
Publica�on 117; Guidelines for Evalua�ng and
Mi�ga�ng Seismic Hazards in California, and
the Southern California Earthquake Centers
(1999) procedures to implement Special
Publica�on 117 – Liquefac�on Hazards (both
documents are incorporated herein by
reference). On sites shown to be suscep�ble
to liquefac�on, the City shall require the
implementa�on of mi�ga�on measures
designed to reduce this hazard to an
acceptable level. The City shall require a State
cer�fied engineering geologist or registered
civil engineer; having competence in the field
of seismic hazard evalua�on and mi�ga�on,
to review the study at the Applicant’s
expense. The review shall determine the
adequacy of the hazard evalua�on and
proposed mi�ga�on measures and determine
whether the requirements of State law are
sa�sfied, as described in Special Publica�on
117 by the California Geological Survey.
silt, and clean construc�on and demoli�on
waste (e.g., broken concrete, asphalt, brick, soil)
that complies with applicable State of California,
Los Angeles County, and City of Irwindale
standards. Prior to backfill, the inert debris was
blended, moisture condi�oned, and compacted
for stability in accordance with State of
California and City of Irwindale requirements of
graded fill materials. Following comple�on of
reclama�on, the Development Area will be
suitable for development and will not be subject
to liquefac�on or other geologic stability
hazards. Addi�onally, site and development
geotechnical inves�ga�ons will be required for
all subsequent development proposals within
the Development Area. City approval of these
inves�ga�ons and incorpora�on of inves�ga�on
requirements and recommenda�ons will be
required prior to the issuance of grading permits
to ensure poten�al hazards due to liquefac�on
are addressed.
IssueArea –Noise: The City ofIrwindalewillwork to reduce the high levels of noise exposure associated with the existing development and transportation facilities in the City.
PSE Policy 5: The City of Irwindale will work
towards reducing noise exposure in the City
by considering noise and land use
compa�bility in land use planning.
The Development Area does not abut noisesensi�ve land uses (e.g., residen�al, schools, etc.). The uses allowed within the
Development Area are compa�ble with the
surrounding industrial uses. Furthermore, the
poten�al noise generated by future
developments has been analyzed in the
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan EIR (as
hereina�er defined) in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and
poten�al impacts will be mi�gated.
3.2 Rela�onship to Zoning Code
The Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Irwindale Municipal Code provides a citywide framework of regula�ons that addresses topics such as permited uses, development standards, parking and landscaping regula�ons, permit procedures, and sign regula�ons.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN III. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAND USE REGULATIONS 17 The Specific Plan serves as the zoning for the Specific Plan Area, and as such, includes the development regula�ons applicable to the Specific Plan Area. In the event that any provision in the Specific Plan conflicts with the Zoning code, the provisions set forth within the Specific Plan shall prevail. In the event the Specific Plan is silent regarding any Zoning provision applicable to the Development Area, the Zoning Code shall prevail.
3.3 Subdivisions
All development in the Development Area shall comply with Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the Irwindale Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act (Cal. Government Code § 66410, et. seq), as applicable.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IV. LAND USE
18 Land Use IV.
19 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IV. LAND USE
4. Land Use
4.1 General Provisions
This section establishes allowable uses within the Development Area. The Specific Plan allows for a variety of uses, including professional offices, and industrial uses, and batery energy storage.
The Development Area is planned for the development of warehousing, distribution, fulfillment center, industrial, manufacturing, battery energy storage systems, and office uses. The SCE Easement Area is planned for infrastructure improvements required to serve the Development Area. A breakdown of the size of the areas within the Specific Plan is as follows:
Table 4-1
Area Size
Gross Site Area 66.64 acres
SCE Easement Area 9.61 acres
Right-of-Way Dedication 4.38 acres
Net Developable Area 52.65 acres
4.2 Summary of Land Use Plan
The Development Area may be developed using one of the two following land use plans:
Land Use Plan 1: Consisting of the entire 52.65-acre Development Area (Figure 4-1). If the Development Area is developed to Land Use Plan 1 the entire site would be developed with industrial, manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, fulfillment center, and office uses (collectively, “Industrial and Business Park Uses”). Sites which are developed with industrial, manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, fulfillment center, and/or office uses shall be referred to as “Industrial and Business Park Sites.”
Land Use Plan 2: Consisting of using the southern 15.94 acres of the Development Area for one or more Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) facilities and the remainder 36.71 acres for industrial, manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, fulfillment center, and office uses (Figure 4-2).
The development of the Development Area according to one of the land uses plans shall not restrict redevelopment of the Development Area according to the other land use plan.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IV. LAND USE
FIGURE 4-1 – LAND USE PLAN NO. 1 20
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATIONAND CIRCULATION 21 FIGURE 4-2 – LAND USE PLAN NO. 2
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 22 Transporta�on and Circula�on V.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 23 5. Transporta�on and Circula�on
5.1 Purpose and Intent
The Circula�on Plan for the Specific Plan provides a roadway network to meet the vehicular and nonvehicular needs of employees and visitors and for the transporta�on of goods to and from the Development Area.
5.2 Vehicular Circula�on
The Circula�on Plan, as illustrated by Figures 5-1 and 5-2, describes the proposed roadway improvements to accommodate traffic generated by the an�cipated Land Use Plan. Vehicular access to the Development Area is provided via Live Oak Avenue, adjacent to the southern boundary of the Specific Plan, and Arrow Highway, which abuts a por�on of the northern boundary of the Specific Plan, and Live Oak Lane, a private street extending from Live Oak Avenue to Arrow Highway. Figures 5-1 and 5-2 demonstrate access and on-site circula�on for conceptual improvements within the Development Area, with and without any BESS facili�es. Figures 5-3 and 5-4 illustrate the typical design of circula�on improvements planned as part of the development project.
The following facili�es and improvements are proposed for the primary components of the Specific Plan’s vehicular circula�on network:
Live Oak Avenue
Live Oak Avenue forms the southern boundary of the Specific Plan. This public roadway provides east/west access to the Development Area and a connec�on point to and from I-605. In its fully improved condi�on, the segment of Live Oak Avenue abu�ng the Specific Plan features a 106-footwide right-of-way (“ROW”), including 34 feet of pavement in the east travel lane (two lanes), 34 feet of pavement in the west travel lane (two lanes), a 16-foot-wide raised center median that reduces to 5-feet to accommodate an 11-foot le� turn lane when needed, and a 9-foot-wide sidewalk with 3- feet of landscape terrace on the south side of the street. As part of the Specific Plan Area’s development, a 5-foot-wide meandering sidewalk and a 5-foot meandering landscaped parkway is provided along the north side of Live Oak Avenue. The exis�ng travel lanes will remain. Live Oak Avenue is a designated truck route. On-street parking is generally prohibited on both sides of the roadway. All frontage improvements to Live Oak Avenue are required to comply with applicable City of Irwindale requirements, including sight distance requirements, except as may otherwise be provided herein. Live Oak Lane (described below) connects to Live Oak Avenue. One direct driveway will connect to Live Oak Avenue at the signalized intersec�on with Graham Road, which will also allow temporary truck access during construc�on. The Live Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane intersec�on shall become signalized to alleviate the addi�onal traffic delay generated by the new developments.
Arrow Highway
Arrow Highway abuts the por�on of the northern boundary of the Specific Plan where Live Oak Lane intersects with Arrow Highway. This public roadway provides east/west access to the Development Area and to/from I-605. The segment of Arrow Highway abu�ng the Development Area is improved
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 24 with a 100-foot-wide ROW, including 36 feet of pavement in each direc�on (2 lanes), a 12-foot-wide raised center median, an exis�ng 5-foot-wide sidewalk 3-foot-wide landscaped parkway on both sides of the ROW. The Development Area will not have direct vehicular access to Arrow Highway. Instead, two driveways will provide access to Live Oak Lane on the north side of the Development Area, which provides access to Arrow Highway at an unsignalized right-in-right out intersec�on. Arrow Highway is a designated truck route. Any frontage improvements to Arrow Highway are required to comply with applicable City of Irwindale requirements, including sight distance requirements, except as may otherwise be provided herein.
Live Oak Lane
Live Oak Lane is an exis�ng collector road that connects the development area to either Live Oak Avenue or Arrow Highway. It is a two-lane undivided road generally oriented in a north-south direc�on. Live Oak Lane is accessible from public streets and provides the primary ingress and egress for all development within the Development Area. Live Oak Lane will have a 60-foot-wide ROW with 40 feet of pavement and 10 feet of sidewalk with parkway on either side of the street. The pavement area includes a 12’ travel lane and an 8’ wide parking lane on each side of the street. The Live Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane intersec�on shall become signalized to alleviate the addi�onal traffic delay generated by the new developments.
Public Alley
A new public alley is provided to connect the northern and southern sec�ons of Live Oak Lane. The public alley is oriented in the north-south direc�on. The public alley is an undivided two-lane ROW that has varied width, which ranges from 38-feet to 47-feet. One 13-foot-wide travel lane is provided on each direc�on, and an 8-foot parking lane is provided adjacent to the southbound travel lane. On the east side of the public alley is a grass terrace that ranges from 4-feet to 13-feet wide.
Private Driveways and Drive Aisles
Interior private driveways and drive aisles are proposed to connect individual building sites within the Development Area and provide vehicular access to Live Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane. Private driveways and drive aisles provide vehicular access for automobiles and trucks to parking lots, truck courts, loading dock areas, etc. The loca�ons, alignments, and widths of private driveways and drive aisles will be determined at the �me buildings are designed and posi�oned as part of implemen�ng development projects and are subject to approval of the Director of Engineering.
Interstate 605
I-605 is located immediately west of the Specific Plan and is under the authority of the California Department of Transporta�on (“Caltrans”). Because the freeway falls completely outside of the Specific Plan Area’s boundary, development of the Development Area does not affect Caltrans’ plans for the opera�on and maintenance of I-605. Drivers of I-605 have convenient access to the Development Area via the on-/off-ramps at Live Oak Avenue and on-/off-ramp at Arrow Highway.
25 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION FIGURE 5-1 – CONCEPTUAL CIRCULATION PLAN WITH BESS
26 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION FIGURE 5-2 – CONCEPTUAL CIRCULATION PLAN WITHOUT BESS
27 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION FIGURE 5-3 – TYPICAL ROW CROSS-SECTION
28 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION FIGURE 5-4 – CROSS SECTION KEY PLAN
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 29 5.3 Non-Vehicular Circula�on
The Specific Plan provides for convenient pedestrian movement and circula�on within the por�on of the Development Area that is accessible to the public via an integrated sidewalk network that is to be designed on individual building sites. As illustrated on Figure 5-5, “Conceptual Non-Vehicular Access Plan with BESS” and 5-6 “Conceptual Non-Vehicular Access without BESS,”, sidewalks are provided in the public right-of-way along the north side of Live Oak Avenue adjacent to the Development Area.
Minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalks are or may be located along both sides of Live Oak Lane to facilitate pedestrian circula�on between Arrow Highway and Live Oak Avenue. Crosswalks are designed at signalized intersec�ons to ensure pedestrian safety. Foothill Transit is a public transit agency that serves the City of Irwindale. A bus stop at Live Oak Avenue and Stewart Avenue is located less than a mile from the Development Area and a bus stop at Rivergrade Road and Arrowhead Hwy is located approximately within a mile and a half of the Development Area.
Both Arrow Highway and Live Oak Avenue are Bicycle Priority Corridors in the City’s Ac�ve Transporta�on Plan. Development in the Development Area would not impact proposed new bicycle facili�es along the roadways.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION FIGURE 5-5 – CONCEPTUAL NONVEHICULAR ACCESS PLAN WITH BESS 30
31 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN V. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION FIGURE 5-6 – CONCEPTUAL NONVEHICULAR ACCESS PLAN WITHOUT BESS
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVLOPMENT STANDARDS 32 Development Standards VI.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 33 6. Development Standards
6.1 Purpose and Intent
This sec�on establishes development standards applicable to all developments within the Development Area. The standards provided herein work in concert with the architecture and landscape guidelines set forth in Sec�on 7, Design Guidelines, to achieve the vision of the Specific Plan. All new developments and altera�ons to exis�ng land uses and structures in the Development Area shall be designed, constructed, and established in compliance with the requirements of this Sec�on.
6.2 Defini�ons
As used herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
“Batery Energy Storage System” or “BESS”: A batery energy storage system (BESS), is an engineered system of electrical devices and equipment that enable electric energy, such as energy generated from renewable energy sources, like solar and wind, to be stored and then released when the power is needed. BESS components may include: batery modules, batery module enclosures, and Batery Management System (BMSs), bi-direc�onal power inverters and transformers, electrical conductors, overhead and/or underground high voltage lines and suppor�ng pole structures, temperature control and ven�la�on systems, fire detec�on and suppression systems, gas detec�on systems, electrical switching equipment, auxiliary power systems, computer and telecommunica�ons equipment, security systems including but not limited to cameras, ligh�ng, signage, stormwater drainage facili�es, perimeter wall or fence, and structures or other suppor�ng ancillary facili�es required to facilitate the safe and efficient opera�on of such systems and equipment or sa�sfy applicable development standards. Batery modules would be stored in numerous freestanding outdoor batery enclosures or containers that shall not be considered Buildings hereunder or otherwise. “Batery Module”: A set of batery cells that are connected together or encapsulated and which are meant to be used either independently or in combina�on with other modules. “Batery Module Enclosure”: A freestanding enclosed container or other structure that contains one or more batery modules. The batery module enclosure is intended to protect the batery modules from external impacts, weather, and the like.
“Building”: Any structure having a roof supported by columns or by walls and intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of persons, animals, or property of any kind. For purposes of this Specific Plan, a Batery Module Enclosure shall not be considered a Building. “Height”: The ver�cal distance as measured from the highest finished grade adjacent to a Building or structure to the highest point of the same Building or structure, including any building parapet or equipment screening walls.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 34 6.3 Permited Uses
Uses are permited in the Specific Plan as indicated in Table 6-1. Uses not iden�fied in this table are not permited unless it is determined by the Community Development Director that a use is similar to other permited uses, pursuant to the provisions of Sec�on 9.3.
The symbols shown in Table 6-1 are defined as follows:
“P” means the use is permited by right, subject to applicable development standards and requirements of this Specific Plan.
“C” means the use is condi�onally permited, subject to the approval of a Condi�onal Use Permit applica�on in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code. “A” means the use is permited by right, provided the use is ancillary to the primary or condi�onally permited use of the property.
“DA” means the use is subject to a Development Agreement. "X” means the use is prohibited.
Table 6-1 Allowable Uses
USE
LAND
USE
PLAN 1
LAND
USE
PLAN 2
ADDITIONAL NOTES
Professional Offices and Services
Administrative and professional offices P P
Banks and Financial Institutions P P With and without drive-thru Data processing and storage centers P P
Industrial, Warehousing, Fabricating, and Manufacturing Uses Automobile and truck repair garages C C
Bakeries and confectionaries, including
manufacturing and wholesale P P
Bottling plants P P
Billboards P P Subject to Chapter 17.20
(Billboards) of the IMC
Computer and electronic parts
manufacturing and assembly P P
Concrete and concrete products
manufacture C C
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 35 USE
LAND
USE
PLAN 1
LAND
USE
PLAN 2
ADDITIONAL NOTES
Distribution warehouses, general
warehouses, and fulfillment centers, for dry
goods
P P
Distribution warehouses, general
warehouses, and fulfillment centers for
chilled, cooled, or frozen goods
P P
A maximum of 387,500 square
feet (SF) of chilled, cooled and
freezer warehouse space is
permitted in the Development
Area.
Fabricating and machining of metal, glass,
wood, stone, or paper. P P
Includes direct-to-consumer
sales of goods and/or products
on the premises, that are either
manufactured, warehoused, or
wholesaled on-site.
Food commissaries C C
Manufacturing or processing of food P P
Limited to manufacture,
wholesale and/or distribution
only. Does not include animal
slaughter.
Industrial retail sales A A Limited to 15% of the Building’s gross sf
Industrial robotics manufacturing and
assembly P P
Job printers P P
Joining and assembly manufacturing P P
Machine Shops P P
Machinery manufacture P P
Manufacturing and assembly of products
made with wood, stone, fiber, textile,
paper, plastic, canvas, casein, cork, clay,
metal, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, electrical,
glass, and wax
P P
Motor vehicle storage P P Indoor storage only
Motor vehicle washing, cleaning, and
detailing, includes mechanical or hand
motor vehicle washing.
A A This ancillary use is not open to
the public.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 36 USE
LAND
USE
PLAN 1
LAND
USE
PLAN 2
ADDITIONAL NOTES
Plastics, fabrication from and molding P P
Includes the light manufacture
of products thereof provided all
grinding and operations are fully
conducted within an enclosed
Building
Plating C C
Research & development
services/laboratories P P
Scientific instrument and equipment
manufacturing or precision materials P P
Self-storage/public C C
Shipping/parcel delivery hub or sorting
center
P P
Other
Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) X DA
Shall be subject to the Irwindale
Municipal Code chapter
regarding BESS for standards
not specified in the Specific
Plan. Development shall be
limited to the area identified as
BESS Area on Figure 4-2.
The Development Agreement
shall comply with any applicable
laws or ordinances in effect at
the �me of Development
Agreement approval.
Telecommunications facilities C C
Subject to Chapter 17.12
(Specific Use Regulations) of the
IMC
6.4 Development Standards - Industrial and Business Park Industrial and Business Park Sites shall comply with the development standards listed in Table 6-2.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 37 Table 6-2-Development Standards
Development Standards Requirement
Site Requirements
Minimum Lot Size 40,000 square feet
Maximum Floor Area Ratio1 0.65
Minimum Setback Requirements2
Arrow Highway Setback
Building 20 ft.
Drive Aisle and Parking3 12 ft.; 10 ft. adjacent to dedicated turn pockets Live Oak Avenue Setback
Building 20 ft.
Drive Aisle and Parking3 12 ft.; 10 ft. adjacent to dedicated turn pockets Live Oak Lane Setback
Building 10 ft.
Drive Aisle and Parking3 10 ft.
Allowable architectural encroachments into
setbacks (cornices, eaves, canopies, etc.)4
5 ft.
Building Requirements
Maximum Building Height 60 ft.
Minimum Distance Between Buildings 20 ft.
Minimum Drive Aisle/Parking Space Separation
Adjacent to building wall 10 ft.
Adjacent to screen wall/fence 5 ft.
Within screened/enclosed yards 0 ft.
Minimum Parking and Access Requirements
Automobile Parking Ratio Per Chapter 17.16 (Parking and Loading Standards) of the IMC
Automobile Parking Stall Size 9 �. x 19 �. (standard)
8 �. x 15 �. (compact)5
Truck Parking/Storage Stall Size 10 �. x 55 �.
Drive Aisle Width 26 �.
Other Development Standards
Walls and Fences 4 ft. minimum height
14 �. maximum height
Minimum Landscaped Area Per Section 6.6
Site Lighting Light fixtures shall not exceed a height of 35’.
Exterior lighting shall produce a maximum
initial illuminance of no greater than 0.5
horizontal and vertical footcandles at the site
boundary and beyond
Signs In accordance with Chapter 17.19 (Signs) of the
IMC
Notes
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 38 1 The FAR maximum shall be calculated as a ra�o of (1) the aggregate square footage of the Building(s) located on any por�on of the Development Area developed for Industrial and Business Park Uses divided by (2) the total square footage of such development site minus areas of public right of way. Under Land Use Plan 1 this would result in 1,490,732 s.f. (52.65 acres x 43,560 sf/acre x 0.65) and 1,039,407 s.f. (36.71 acres x 43,560 sf/acre x 0.65) under Land Use Plan 2. 2 Minimum setback area shall be that distance measured between the face of the building wall or closest side of structure to the edge of the public right of way. 3 En�re setback shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs, groundcovers, and/or vines and may include walkways, benches, trellises, thema�c fencing/walls, and related ameni�es. 4 Only permited where adequate emergency access can be maintained. 5 Compact spaces shall comprise no more than 25% of all required automobile parking spaces.
6.4.1 Other Development Standards (Industrial and Business Park) In addi�on to the development standards required by Table 6-1, the following standards apply to Industrial and Business Park Sites:
1. Manufacturing and processing ac�vi�es shall be conducted within a wholly enclosed building.
2. Outdoor storage of materials and equipment shall be ancillary to a permited use. Outdoor storage shall be fully screened and trucks and vehicles shall be stored within enclosed areas.
3. All loading/unloading of trucks shall occur within the truck courts. Trucks and service vehicles shall have clear and convenient access into and within truck courts or loading areas of every building and shall not be located to disrupt vehicular and pedestrian circula�on. The loading/unloading of trucks within the right-of-way shall be prohibited.
4. Loading docks and truck yards shall be visually screened from public streets by walls, fencing, landscaping, and/or other screening features or barriers (such as berms) with a height of 14 feet, as measured from the interior side of the barrier.
5. Ground-mounted exterior mechanical and electrical equipment, hea�ng, ven�la�ng, air condi�oning, tanks, and other mechanical and electrical devices shall be screened and treated with a neutral color or obscured by landscaping when visible from Arrow Highway, Live Oak Avenue, or Live Oak Lane.
6. Roof-mounted equipment shall be screened when visible from Arrow Highway, Live Oak Avenue, or Live Oak Lane. Screening may be accomplished with the building parapet or the use of a roof mounted equipment screen. Screening materials shall be compa�ble with the design and architecture of the building.
7. Entry gates shall be posi�oned to allow enough distance for the stacking of at least one (1) 5- axle truck in front of each gate without any por�on of the truck extending into the public right-of-way.
8. Locate and design service entrances so they do not interfere with owner/tenant/customer access.
9. Trash and refuse collec�on areas shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 17.13 (Site Planning and General Development Standards) of the IMC.
10. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a Comprehensive Sign Program shall be approved by the City pursuant to Chapter 17.19 (Signs) of the IMC.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 39 6.5 Development Standards – Batery Energy Storage Systems Batery Energy Storage System developments shall comply with the development standards contained in Table 6-3.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 40 Table 6-3-Development Standards
Development Standards Requirement
Site Requirements
Maximum Lot Coverage1 65%
Minimum Setback Requirements2
Live Oak Avenue Setback
BESS equipment or other enclosed structure 20 ft.
Drive Aisle and Parking3 12 ft.; 10 ft. adjacent to dedicated turn pockets Live Oak Lane Setback
BESS equipment or other enclosed structure 10 ft.
Drive Aisle and Parking3 10 ft.
BESS and Building Requirements
Maximum BESS Equipment Height 12 ft.
Maximum Building Height 15 ft.
Minimum Parking and Access Requirements
Automobile Parking Ratio
BESS areas Four (4) parking spaces for the en�re BESS
facility
Automobile Parking Stall Size 9 �. x 19 �. (standard)
8 �. x 15 �. (compact)4
Minimum Drive Aisle Width 20 �.
Other Development Standards
Walls and Fences 14 �. maximum height
Minimum Landscaped Area Per Sec�on 6.6
Site Lighting Light fixtures shall not exceed a height of 35 ft.
Signs
In accordance with Chapter 17.19 (Signs) of the
IMC
Maximum Height of BESS Substation Dead-end
Structure5 65 �.
Maximum Height of Interconnection Poles to
Southern California Edison Substation (along Live
Oak Ave).
The electrical �e-line shall be undergrounded
unless the applicable agency(ies), including but
not limited to Southern California Edison or
California Independent System Operator
(CALISO), reject the proposed underground
line. If the applicable agency(ies) require
an overhead �e-line, the Applicant shall
be subject to a Zone Variance applica�on per
IMC Chapter 17.32.
Notes
1 Lot coverage shall be calculated as a ra�o of (1) the total aggregate square footage of area within any development site of the footprint of Batery Module Enclosures, inverters, transformers, and any ancillary buildings divided by (2) the total square footage of such development site.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 41 2 Minimum setback area shall be that distance measured between the face of the building wall or closest side of structure to the edge of the public right of way. 3 En�re required setback shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs, groundcovers, and/or vines and may include walkways, benches, trellises, thema�c fencing/walls, and related ameni�es.
4 Compact spaces shall comprise no more than 25% of all required automobile parking spaces. 5 The dead-end structure is the onsite substa�on termina�on of the transmission line and highest structure for the onsite substa�on.
6.5.1 Other Development Standards (BESS)
In addi�on to the development standards required by Table 6-2, the following standards apply to Batery Energy Storage System developments:
1. A BESS facility shall be screened with an 8-foot-high wall where in sight of proximal por�ons of Live Oak Avenue or Live Oak Lane at Specific Plan build-out.
2. The ground surface of a BESS facility shall be covered with gravel, asphalt, concrete, or other compa�ble materials.
3. BESS collector substa�on metal structures and high voltage line support poles shall be galvanized steel or finished with another low-reflec�ve neutral colored surfacing when visible from Arrow Highway, Live Oak Avenue, or Live Oak Lane.
4. A BESS facility may include an onsite “collector” substa�on that would connect via a 230 kV underground electric �e-line to a Point of Interconnec�on (POI) at the exis�ng Southern California Edison (“SCE”) Edison Rio Hondo Substa�on located south of Live Oak Avenue. The electrical �e-line shall be undergrounded unless the applicable agency(ies), including but not limited to Southern California Edison or California Independent System Operator (CALISO), reject the proposed underground line. If the applicable agency(ies) require an overhead �e-line, the Applicant shall be subject to a Zone Variance applica�on per IMC Chapter 17.32. The overhead line would transi�on to underground at a transi�on pole.
The underground por�on of the electric �e-line would consist of conduits containing electric power cables, fiber op�c communica�ons cable, and a grounding conductor within an approximately 3’-0” wide and 3’-0” deep, high-strength concrete encasement that would be a minimum of 3’-0” below the surface. Impacts related to the undergrounding of the electric �e-line would not result in a net increase of impacts of the proposed projects. .
5. A BESS facility may include, but is not required to include, a single-story warehouse-type building for storage of parts used for maintenance. Any such single-story warehouse-type building shall be consistent with the Design Guidelines set forth in Chapter 7 of this Specific Plan.
6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a Comprehensive Sign Program shall be approved by the City pursuant to Chapter 17.19 (Signs) of the IMC.
6.6 Landscape
The following requirements shall apply to all site improvements within the Development Area, regardless of which Land Use Plan is implemented.
6.6.1 General Requirements
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 42 1. Minimum Site Landscaping. A minimum of 10% of the site area shall be landscaped.
2. Parking Lot Landscaping. A minimum of 20% of the total required landscape shall be provided in the parking lot; provided, however, that this requirement shall not apply to a development site within the Development Area that is being used for BESS.
3. Required Areas. All setbacks, parkways, open areas, plazas, paseos, and non-work areas that are visible from a public street/alley or from a parking lot available to the general public shall be landscaped.
4. Landscape Coverage Requirement. Shrubs, groundcover, and other plant material shall cover all areas that are visible from a public street/alley or from a parking lot available to the general public and that are not occupied by structures, parking areas, storage, trash enclosures, driveways, and sidewalks at the �me of issuance of a Cer�ficate of Occupancy. Embellished pavement, fountains, and similar hardscape materials may, in part, be subs�tuted for the required landscaping through the Site Plan and Design Review process.
5. Parkway-Adjacent Plan�ng and Maintenance. Parkways located between the sidewalk and the edge of development shall meet the following requirements:
a. The ground surface shall contain shrubs, mulch, or ground cover to provide coverage within two years.
b. If a wall or fence separates the development from the street, plan�ng vines or espalier shrubs shall be incorporated into the plan�ng design.
6. Required Landscaping for Loading Areas. Loading areas shall incorporate landscaping to provide screening if visible from the public right-of-way, adjacent uses, and pedestrians.
6.6.2 Trees
1. Perimeter landscaping shall include one street tree for each 30 lineal feet of street frontage.
2. Within parking areas, one tree for each 25 parking spaces shall be provided.
3. All trees planted along a street frontage shall be of a minimum 15-gallon size. Palm trees shall have a minimum brown trunk height of six feet.
4. All other trees planted in required landscaped areas shall be a minimum of five-gallon size or have a brown trunk height of three feet.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
43 Design Guidelines VII.
44 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
7. Design Guidelines
7.1 Purpose and Intent
The Design Guidelines presented in this sec�on establish the quality and character of the built environment for the master-planned development of the Specific Plan. The objec�ves of the Design Guidelines are:
1. To describe the thema�c elements and the construc�on quality expected for the Development Area.
2. To provide the City of Irwindale with assurance that the Development Area will be developed in accordance with the quality and character described within this Specific Plan.
3. To serve as a guide to developers, builders, engineers, architects, landscape architects, and other professionals involved with implemen�ng development in the Development Area in order to achieve and maintain the desired design quality.
4. To provide an aesthe�c benchmark for the City of Irwindale to use in their review of future implemen�ng projects within the Development Area.
5. To steer the Development Area to convey a contemporary aesthe�c theme and character while allowing flexibility for prac�cal applica�on and crea�ve expression.
6. To encourage the implementa�on of energy efficient design features in Buildings that can be implemented in the site planning, design, and construc�on phases of the Development Area to minimize waste deposited at landfills, decrease energy use and fossil fuel consump�on, and reduce domes�c water consump�on.
7.2 Applicability
The Design Guidelines presented in this chapter apply to all development within the Specific Plan Area, except Batery Module Enclosures and associated substa�on and electrical equipment (collec�vely, “BESS Facili�es”), for which uses, only the development regula�ons shall apply. Where these Design Guidelines are silent, except with respect to BESS Facili�es, the City’s Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines shall prevail.
7.3 Site Planning
This sec�on sets forth general site planning guidelines that address unique considera�ons associated with development within the Development Area.
1. Locate the office por�on of Buildings at the corner(s) of the Building. For Buildings adjacent to Live Oak Avenue or Live Oak Lane, orient the office toward the road to provide visual interest from the public roadway.
2. Orient and screen elements such as trash enclosure areas, loading bay doors, and service docks in ways that minimize their visibility from Live Oak Avenue or Live Oak Lane.
3. Use solid walls, screened fences, landscaping, or other visual barriers to visually screen truck courts and loading docks from public view from Live Oak Avenue or Live Oak Lane, where possible.
45 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
4. Site design shall specifically address the needs of pick-up, delivery, and service vehicles related to Industrial and Business Park Uses.
a. Design loading areas to provide for tractor trailer backing and maneuvering on-site and not from a public street.
b. Provide appropriate on-site service vehicle parking/turnouts in an efficient, nonobtrusive loca�on appropriate to the scale and needs of the development. c. Loading vehicles, when parked, shall not impede normal traffic flow.
Conceptual site plans are shown in Figures 7-1 and 7-2.
7.4 Building Architecture
7.4.1 Architectural Design
Buildings should be characterized by simple and dis�nct cubic masses with interlocking volumes of wall planes, colors, and materials to create visual appeal, aesthe�cally pleasing propor�ons, and strong shadow paterns. Colors, materials, and textures will be mixed to create interest.
A Spanish contemporary influence is required throughout the Development Area. All design elements of Buildings shall be compa�ble (but not iden�cal) in character, massing, and materials in order to promote a clean and contemporary style. Crea�vity is encouraged in building design, with care taken to maintain a sense of similarity among all Buildings to reinforce a unified image within the Development Area. Generally, Buildings within the Development Area shall not be overly “trendy” or strongly historical; however, contemporary Spanish thema�c elements visible from public streets, such as arched entryways and windows, and other subtle references to the history of the region are acceptable. Architectural styles should complement, not detract from, the general architectural character found in the City of Irwindale.
7.4.2 Building Form
Building form is one of the primary elements of architecture. Numerous design aspects, including shape, mass (size), scale, propor�on, and ar�cula�on, are elements of a Building’s “form.” Building forms are especially important for building eleva�ons that face the following view corridors:
1. Building façades that face and are immediately adjacent to and visible from Live Oak Avenue.
2. Building façades that face and are immediately adjacent to and visible from Arrow Highway.
3. Building façades that face and are immediately adjacent to and visible from Live Oak Lane.
The following guidelines apply to all Buildings within the Development Area to ensure that structural development is visually appealing and invi�ng to pedestrians and motorists:
1. Use geometric forms to cons�tute the overall building form. Rectangular forms are encouraged to promote balance, rhythm, and visual interest. Layering of forms creates detail, depth and shadow and is strongly encouraged. However, avoid arbitrary, complicated building forms.
2. Ar�culate building planes visible from Live Oak Avenue, Arrow Highway, I-605, and/or Live Oak Lane by changes in exterior building materials, color, texture, and decora�ve accents.
46 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES Ar�culated features (e.g., pop-outs and recesses, breaks, overhangs, height changes, etc.) should be used to create a pedestrian scale at primary Building entries.
3. Modula�on and varia�on of building masses between adjacent Buildings visible from Live Oak Avenue, Arrow Highway, and Live Oak Lane is encouraged. This includes varied parapet heights and change of building plane, in plan.
4. Generous use of windows and doors in the office areas and ar�cula�on and different paint colors to break up Building walls and bulk.
5. Design each Building to have a well-defined entry with careful roof and façade ar�cula�on to create visual interest and scale, including changes in massing, color, and/or building materials.
6. Recess or cover pedestrian and ground-level Building entries by architectural projec�ons or roofs in order to provide shade and visual relief.
7. Design Buildings to have a base and cornice expression. These expressions can be accomplished through the use of clean, simplis�c, and not overly complicated architectural and trim detailing on Building façades, and changes of material/color or recesses.
8. Materials applied to building eleva�ons should turn the corner of the Building to a logical termina�on point in rela�on to architectural features or massing.
Conceptual eleva�ons demonstra�ng acceptable building form are illustrated in Figure 7-3 below.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-1 – CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN WITH BESS 47
48 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES FIGURE 7-2 – CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN WITHOUT BESS
49 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES FIGURE 7-3 – CONCEPTUAL BUILDING FORM
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
50 7.4.3 Building Materials, Colors, and Textures
The use of complementary materials and colors for Buildings plays a key role in developing a clean, contemporary visual environment. Accordingly, the selected exterior materials, colors, and textures for Buildings should complement one another among all Buildings within the Development Area.
Slight varia�ons in materials, colors, and/or textures from Building to Building are encouraged to provide visual interest.
1. Appropriate primary exterior building materials include stucco, concrete, and similar materials, including concrete �lt-up panels. Accent primary materials used on Building facades that are visible from public rights of way through the use of secondary materials such as glass or glazing units, glass block, natural or fabricated stone, brick, metal, and �le or �le panel systems.
2. The use of metal and/or glass fabrica�ons for curtain wall areas are appropriate.
3. Trim details may include metal finished in a consistent color, plaster, contemporary shaped foam, or concrete elements finished consistently with the building treatment. Use of overly extraneous “themed” detailing, like oversized or excessively shaped foam cornice caps, foam molding, and window detailing is discouraged.
4. Material changes should occur at intersec�ng planes, preferably at the inside corners of change of wall planes, or where architectural elements intersect.
5. Primary exterior Building colors are encouraged to be light and warm tones. Darker and/or more vibrant accent colors may be provided in focal point areas, such as around Building entrances and near outdoor gathering spaces.
6. Bright primary colors, garish use of color and arbitrary paterns or stripes are discouraged, except in signage logos.
7. Exposed downspouts, service doors and mechanical screen colors should be the same color as the adjacent Building wall.
The Suggested Material and Color Palete shown in Figure 7-4 below is for conceptual purposes only.
Other colors that are consistent or similar in nature to the colors provided in the Suggested Color Palete may also be considered as appropriate.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-4 – COLOR AND MATERIAL PALETTE 51
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
52 7.4.4 Windows and Doors
The paterns of openings – windows and doors (excluding trailer-loading dock doors) – are to correspond with the overall rhythm of the Building and be consistent in form, patern, and color.
Guidelines for windows and doors used in the Development Area are as follows:
1. Introduce recessed window and door openings to enhance the visual play of light and shadow.
2. When possible, place the layout of doors and windows on individual Building façades in a repe��ve patern to create con�nuity.
3. Use consistent styles, forms and colors of windows.
4. Gold or unfinished/untreated metal window or door frames are prohibited. Clear silver anodized frames are allowed.
5. Use clear or colored glass with medium to high performance glazing. Silver mirrored glass is prohibited.
6. Clearly define all pedestrian entrances to Buildings by features such as overhangs, awnings, and canopies or embellished with decora�ve framing treatments – including but not limited to accent trim. Dark and confined entries, flush doorways, and unar�culated entry alcoves are discouraged.
Figure 7-5- Windows and Doors
7.4.5 Func�onal Elements
Carefully consider the design and loca�on of func�onal elements common to all Buildings. Examples of func�onal elements include loading doors, service docks, ground or wall-mounted equipment, roo�op equipment, rain guters and downspouts, and trash enclosures.
Loading Doors and Service Docks
1. Orient and screen loading doors, service docks, and equipment areas so they are not easily visible from Live Oak Avenue, Arrow Highway, Live Oak Lane, and publicly accessible loca�ons within the Irwindale Gateway Development Area. Screening may be accomplished with solid walls or fences that are compa�ble with the architectural expression of the Building or by any effec�ve combina�on of walls, fences, landscaping, and berms.
2. No direct loading or unloading ac�vity is permited to take place from Live Oak Avenue, Arrow Highway, or Live Oak Lane. Trucks and service vehicles shall have clear and convenient access
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
53 into and within truck courts or loading areas of every building within the Development Area and should not disrupt vehicular and pedestrian circula�on.
3. Separate loading docks and truck courts from visitor and customer parking areas and pedestrian circula�on areas (e.g., walkways) u�lizing walls, fences and/or landscaping.
4. Design truck and service vehicle entries to provide clear and convenient access to truck courts and loading areas such that passenger vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle circula�on is not adversely affected.
Ground or Wall-Mounted Equipment
1. Locate electrical equipment rooms within a Building. Pop-outs or shed-like addi�ons are discouraged, unless fully incorporated in the architectural concept of the Building.
2. Ground-mounted equipment, including but not limited to mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, emergency generators, boilers, storage tanks, risers, and electrical conduits, but specifically excluding electrical transformers, shall be screened to limit visibility from off-site public viewing areas. Screening may be accomplished with site walls or landscape elements that are consistent with these Design Guidelines.
3. Wall-mounted items, such as roof ladders or electrical panels, shall not be located on the Building façade facing adjacent public roads when alterna�ve loca�ons are prac�cal and safe.
Wall-mounted items should be screened or incorporated into the architectural elements of the Building so as not to be visually obvious from public streets or other publicly accessible areas within or adjacent to the Development Area.
Rooftop Equipment
1. Roo�op equipment, including but limited to mechanical equipment, electrical equipment, storage tanks, cellular telephone facili�es, satellite dishes, skylights, vents, exhaust fans, smoke hatches, and mechanical ducts, shall be screened to limit visibility from public roads or visitor parking lots within the Development Area.
2. Roo�op screens (i.e., parapet walls) shall be integrated into the architecture of the main Building.
3. Wood finished roo�op screens are prohibited.
Trash Enclosures
1. All outdoor refuse containers shall be screened within a permanent, durable enclosure and should be oriented so they are not easily visible from public roads or other public viewing areas.
2. The design of trash enclosures shall reflect the architectural style of adjacent Buildings and use similar, high-quality materials.
3. Refuse collec�on areas shall be located behind or to the side of Buildings, away from the Building’s main entrance.
4. All outdoor trash enclosures shall be constructed with solid roofs to prevent exposure of dumpster contents to rainfall and prevent polluted storm water runoff from these structures.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
54 7.5 Landscape Architecture
The Specific Plan incorporates landscaping as a visual amenity along its perimeter to so�en and minimize the perceived scale of development. Figures 7-6 and 7-7 illustrate the loca�on of landscape ameni�es around the Development Area.
These Landscape Design Guidelines complement the exis�ng se�ng of Irwindale, Southern California climate and local soil condi�ons, ease of maintenance, and water conserva�on. Water-efficient and drought-tolerant plant materials shall be placed throughout the Specific Plan and ‘smart’ computercontrolled irriga�on systems shall be used to reduce water use to the minimum level necessary. These Landscape Design Guidelines promote an iden�ty for the Development Area that is visually appealing and sensi�ve to the environment.
Although specific design informa�on is presented in these Landscape Design Guidelines, these Guidelines are not intended to establish a set of rigid landscaping requirements for the Development Area and it is recognized that, at �mes, there may be a need to adapt these guidelines to meet certain pad-specific or building user iden�ty requirements. As such, these Landscape Guidelines are intended to be flexible. However, it is cri�cal to the Development Area’s long-term design integrity that any devia�ons from these Landscape Design Guidelines are in keeping with the spirit of the core elements of the overall theme described herein to ensure a cohesive and unified landscape concept across the Development Area.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-6 – CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH BESS 55
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-7 – CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WITHOUT BESS 56
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
57 7.5.1 Plant Palete
The plant palete for the Specific Plan includes colorful shrubs and groundcovers, ornamental grasses and succulents, and evergreen deciduous trees – including flowering varie�es – that are commonly used throughout southern California, and which complement the Specific Plan’s design theme and se�ng. The plant materials used within the Specific Plan are water-efficient species that can thrive in the arid southern California climate.
Table 7-1, Plant Palete, provides a list of plant materials approved for use within the Specific Plan.
The plants listed in Table 7-1 establish a base palete for the Specific Plan’s landscape design. Other similar plant materials may be subs�tuted for species listed in Table 7-1, provided the alterna�ve plants are drought-tolerant and complement the Specific Plan’s landscape theme.
Table 7-1-Plant Palete
PLANT TYPE PLANTS
ENTRY ACCENT PALM TREES Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera) STREET TREES Camphor Tree (Cinnamomum camphora)
Carrotwood Tree (Cupaniopsis anacradiodes)
Jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia)
London Plane Tree (Platanus x acerifolia)
Ornamental Pear (Pyrus calleryana)
Queen Palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana)
PARKING LOT TREES African Sumac (Searsia lancea)
Botle Tree (Brachychiton populneus)
Fern Pine (Podocarpus gracilior)
Karee (Rhus lancea)
FLOWERING TREES Blue Palo Verde (Parkinsonia florida)
Western Redbud (Cercis occidentalis)
Chinese Flame Tree (Koelreuteria bipinnata)
Pink Dawn (Chitalpa tashkentensis)
Crape Myrtle (Lagerstroemia)
EVERGREEN TREES Australian Willow (Geijera parviflora)
Brisbane Box (Lophostemon confertus)
Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia)
Mondell Pine (Pinus eldarica)
SHRUBS Litle John (Callistemon)
Coastal Rosemary (Westringia fruticose)
Purple leaf hopbush (Dodonaea viscosa ‘purpurea’)
Fortnight Lily (Dietes bicolor)
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
58 7.5.2 Entry Treatments and Project Iden�fica�on
Project Monuments
Three (3) project monuments (signs and water features) are provided to iden�fy the Development Area. A monument sign fron�ng Live Oak Avenue across from Graham Avenue will provide iden�fica�on on the south end of the Development Area (see Figures 7-8 and 7-9). This monument will be highly visible from the I-605 Live Oak offramp. A second monument sign at the project entry on Live Oak Lane at the intersec�on with Arrow Highway will provide iden�fica�on on the north end of the Development Area (see Figures 7-10 and 7-11). A fountain at Live Oak Lane and Live Oak Avenue will provide an atrac�ve welcome as motorists and pedestrians enter the Development Area (See Figure 7-12). The entry treatments are designed to provide dis�nc�ve visual statements and emphasize the Development Area’s contemporary aesthe�c.
The project monuments described and illustrated herein are designed to provide a strong sense of arrival to employees, visitors, and passing motorist, to iden�fy the dis�nc�veness of the Development Area, and to complement and reinforce the Development Area’s general architectural and landscape theme. Implemented entry treatments may differ slightly from the concepts presented herein; however, all corner entry treatments provided within the Development Area shall be consistent in theme and character. The designs of these entry treatments are conceptually shown below. Each loca�on provides a monument sign and landscaping consis�ng of water features, accent palm trees, drought tolerant ground cover and shrub masses, screen shrubs, and street trees. Flowering and colorful plant material is recommended.
PLANT TYPE PLANTS
Indian Hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis indica)
Waxleaf Privet (Ligustrum japonicum ‘texanum’)
Mock Orange (Pittosporum Tobira)
Tuscan Blue Rosemary (Rosmarinus o. ‘tuscan blue’)
Texas Sage (Leucophyllum frutescens)
GROUND COVERS Desert Carpet (Acacia redolens)
Autumn Sage (Salvia greggii)
Deer Grass (Muhlenbergia rigens)
Small Cape Rush (Chondropetalum tectrorum)
Dwarf Mat Rush (Lomandra longifolia ‘breeze’)
Dwarf Yellow Bush Lantana (Lantana m. ‘dwarf yellow’)
Mexican Sage Bush (Salvia leucantha)
Star Jasmine (Trachelospermum jasminoides)
Creeping Rosemary (Rosmarinus o. ‘prostratus’)
Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea)
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
59 Building Site Entry Treatments
Entry treatments for building sites may be provided at driveways connec�ng to Live Oak Avenue or Live Oak Lane. The loca�ons of such driveways will be determined at the �me Buildings are designed and oriented in the Development Area as part of implemen�ng development projects. Building entry treatments are meant to iden�fy Building occupants and welcome employees and visitors to the site.
The designs of typical Building entry treatments are conceptually shown below, and may include signs, flowering accent trees, drought tolerant groundcover and shrub masses, evergreen screen trees, and enhanced Building entry paving.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN
GUIDELINES
60 FIGURE 7-8 – ENTRY TREATMENT LOCATION MAP
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN
GUIDELINES
61 FIGURE 7-9 – ENTRY TREATMENT - LIVE OAK AVENUE AT GRAHAM AVENUE
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN
GUIDELINES
62 FIGURE 7-10 – ENTRY TREATMENT - LIVE OAK AVENUE AT GRAHAM AVENUE (DETAIL)
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN
GUIDELINES
63 FIGURE 7-11 – ENTRY TREATMENT – ARROW HIGHWAY AT LIVE OAK LANE
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN
GUIDELINES
64 FIGURE 7-12 – ENTRY TREATMENT – ARROW HIGHWAY AT LIVE OAK LANE (DETAIL)
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-13 – ENTRY TREATMENT LIVE OAK AVENUE AT LIVE OAK LANE 65
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-14 – ENTRY TREATMENT LIVE OAK AVENUE AT LIVE OAK LANE (DETAIL) 66
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
67 7.5.3 Streetscapes
Streetscape landscaping within the Specific Plan plays a cri�cal role in establishing a strong sense of place and character. In addi�on, streetscapes serve func�onal purposes, including screening undesirable func�onal elements of a building site from public view.
Live Oak Avenue Streetscape
The southern boundary of the Specific Plan abuts Live Oak Avenue. The interface with Live Oak Avenue is designed to feature a five-foot wide parkway with street trees and a five-foot wide sidewalk between the parkway and property line (see Figure 7-13). A backdrop of trees along parking lot perimeters, and screen shrubs along with assorted drought tolerant groundcovers is proposed to provide a physical and visual buffer from Live Oak Avenue. At this interface, an assortment of evergreen and deciduous canopy street trees along with palm tree clusters and screen shrubs is expected.
Live Oak Lane Streetscape
The eastern boundary of the Specific Plan abuts Live Oak Avenue. Within the Specific Plan, the streetscape of Live Oak Lane is planted with a combina�on of evergreen and deciduous trees, low shrubs, and masses of groundcovers to create a visually pleasing experience for pedestrians and passing motorists (see Figure 7-14). A five-foot wide parkway with street trees and a five-foot wide sidewalk between the parkway and property line is also proposed. The landscaping plant palete for the streetscape should link the roadway to the rest of the Development Area and should reflect the Development Area’s landscape design theme.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
68 FIGURE 7-15 – STREET IMPROVEMENTS – LIVE OAK AVENUE
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-16 – STREET IMPROVEMENTS – LIVE OAK LANE 69
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
70 7.6 Fences and Walls
The final loca�ons and details of walls and fences will be determined during implementa�on of the Specific Plan when building footprints and orienta�ons are known. Implemen�ng projects may modify the loca�ons and/or details of the walls and fences described below and illustrated in Figures 7-15, 7- 16, and 7-17, provided that any modifica�ons are consistent with the spirit and intent of these guidelines.
The exis�ng 6-foot-tall chain link fence along the western border of the Specific Plan abu�ng I-605 will remain in place. Tubular steel fencing is expected within individual building sites around loading and dock areas, truck yards, and surface deten�on basins. Tubular steel fencing is designed to range from 4 to 10 feet in height, consis�ng of tubular steel pickets.
Solid screen walls may be provided within individual building sites around loading and dock areas, truck yards, and parking lots. A solid wall is preferred over fencing when complete visual screening is necessary, or for noise atenua�on. Screen walls are designed to be a height of 14 feet tall, as measured from the high side of the wall. Screen walls may be constructed of a decora�ve masonry, decora�ve CMU block, or concrete panel; provided, however, that a screen wall of decora�ve CMU block approximately 620’ long shall be located along the southern boundary of the Development Area to screen the area from Live Oak Avenue. Landscaping, including trees, should be planted along the outer face of the screen wall (i.e., facing Live Oak Avenue or Live Oak Lane) to minimize the perceived size and scale of the wall.
The loca�ons and details of walls and fences internal to the Development Area will be determined in conjunc�on with development of each site. Internal walls and fences may be provided along the perimeter of parking and loading areas and between building pad areas for screening and security. All internal walls visible from public streets or public viewing areas shall be built with atrac�ve, durable materials that are compa�ble with other design elements of the Specific Plan.
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-17 – FENCE AND WALL PLAN WITH BESS 71
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-18 – FENCE AND WALL PLAN WITHOUT BESS 72
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
FIGURE 7-19 –WALL PLAN DESIGN 73
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES
74 7.7 Ligh�ng
Outdoor ligh�ng of the Development Area is an essen�al architectural component that provides aesthe�c appeal, enhances safe pedestrian and vehicular circula�on, and adds to security. Ligh�ng within the public right-of-way shall adhere to applicable City of Irwindale requirements.
All ligh�ng on private property in the Development Area should adhere to the following guidelines:
1. Minimize glare and “spill over” light onto public streets and adjacent proper�es by using downward-directed lights and/or cutoff devises on outdoor ligh�ng fixtures, including spotlights, floodlights, electrical reflectors, and other means of illumina�on for signs, structures, parking, loading, unloading, and similar areas. Where desired, illuminate trees and other landscape features by concealed light fixtures. Limit light spillover or trespass to onequarter foot-candle or less, measured from within five feet of any adjacent property line.
2. Exterior ligh�ng shall produce a maximum ini�al illuminance of no greater than 0.5 horizontal and ver�cal footcandles at the site boundary and beyond.
3. The maximum height of free-standing, outdoor light fixtures shall be 35 feet. The maximum height for outdoor bollard-type ligh�ng shall be four (4) feet. Overall, light fixtures shall be the minimum height necessary to maintain pedestrian and motorist safety and facilitate site opera�ons and security.
4. Select all ligh�ng fixtures used in the Development Area from the same – or complementary – family of fixtures with respect to design, materials, fixture color, and light color.
5. Lights should be unbreakable, recessed, or otherwise designed to reduce the problems associated with damage and replacement of fixtures.
6. Neon, flashing and gyra�ng ligh�ng are prohibited.
7. Locate all electrical meter pedestals and light switch/control equipment in areas with minimum public visibility or screen them with appropriate plant materials.
8. Illuminate parking lots, loading dock areas, pedestrian walkways, Building entrances, and public sidewalks to the level necessary for Building opera�on and security reasons. Dimmers and mo�on detectors are permited. Ligh�ng shall have automa�c shut off features between dawn and dusk.
9. Use exterior lights to accent entrances, plazas, ac�vity areas, and special features.
10. Provide for illumina�on intensity during hours of darkness as follows:
a. To illuminate parking lots or parking structures and their pedestrian links that provide more than five parking spaces for use by the general public, provide a minimum coverage of one foot-candle of light with a maximum of eight foot-candles on the parking or walkway surface, unless otherwise approved by the City of Irwindale for visibility and security.
b. To illuminate aisles and passageways within a Building complex, provide a maximum of one-half to one foot-candle of maintained ligh�ng.
11. Low intensity, energy-conserving night ligh�ng is preferred, such as fixtures equipped with light emi�ng diodes (LED).
12. High Pressure Sodium (HPS) light fixtures are prohibited for site ligh�ng.
75 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN U�lity Infrastructure Plan VIII
76 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN
8. U�lity Infrastructure
Buildout of the Specific Plan requires the installa�on of water, sewer, storm water drainage dry u�lity infrastructure, and solid waste disposal as described below. All u�lity infrastructure improvements are required to be installed in accordance with applicable City of Irwindale and public service provider design standards and specifica�ons.
8.1 Water
As shown on Figures 8-1 and 8-2, Conceptual Water Plan, Valley County Water District provides water infrastructure to service the Specific Plan area. An exis�ng 12” Valley County Water District main is located in Live Oak Lane, a private road. To service the Development Area with domes�c water, including fire protec�on service and irrigated landscaping, a connec�on would be made to the exis�ng line to service future buildings and facili�es. Water and fire service would be provided with a new 12- inch main comprising private on-site loop system that connects to the exis�ng water line in Live Oak Lane. Alterna�vely, the water district may require new infrastructure to loop its system through Live Oak Lane. All water service and connec�on to the distribu�on system shall be reviewed and approved by the Valley County Water District.
8.2 Sanitary Sewer
As shown on Figures 8-3 and 8-4, Conceptual Sewer Plan, the Specific Plan provides private sewer infrastructure for the interior of the Development Area. Connec�ons to exis�ng public sewer mains are located off-site within Live Oak Avenue to the southeast of the Development Area. The sanitary sewer system for the Development Area will u�lize 6”-8” on site private sewer lines, which will be conveyed to a proposed public 6” force main sewer line that drains east on Live Oak Avenue to the exis�ng 10” VCP sewer line on Live Oak Avenue and Rivergrade Road. The private sewer infrastructure collects wastewater flows from the Development Area and conveys these flows to the off-site exis�ng public sewer mains within Live Oak Avenue. All private sewer infrastructure will be installed on-site beneath private driveways and drive aisles, and/or parking lots/truck courts to facilitate access for rou�ne maintenance and/or repair. Loca�ons and alignments of all sewer mains, laterals and connec�on points shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer from the City of Irwindale Public Works Department.
8.3 Storm Water Drainage
Prior to use of the Development Area property as a quarry, stormwater flowed across the site from the north and east to the southwest and would leave the site at its southwest corner and discharge to an exis�ng unimproved drainage basin located on the western por�on of the Specific Plan within an SCE easement area. As shown on Figures 8-5 and 8-6, Conceptual Storm Water Management Plan the Specific Plan’s storm water management system will mimic the property’s historical drainage patern. Storm water flows will be conveyed across the Development Area via a backbone storm drain network to a deten�on/infiltra�on basin, which will be constructed pursuant to the approved LID and will replace the exis�ng unimproved drainage basin. A storm drain li� sta�on will convey water southeast through a 12” private force main and into a proposed 24” public storm drain within Live Oak Avenue, and then into the San Gabriel River.
77 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Low Impact Development (LID) site design strategies and Best Management Prac�ce (BMP) control measures promote the use of natural infiltra�on (where permited), evapora�on, and use of stormwater. LID strategies include, in order of priority: 1) bioreten�on/infiltra�on systems, 2) capture and reuse systems, 3) high efficiency biofiltra�on systems, and 4) proprietary filtra�on systems. The primary LID measure for the Development Area includes deten�on basins, capable of retaining the required water quality volumes, designed with either so� botoms and/or dry wells for infiltra�on purposes as water quality measures. Where feasible, subsurface storage chambers that serve as water quality infiltra�on measures can be implemented within the Development Area. The type and extent of the water quality infiltra�on measures will ul�mately be determined based on geotechnical report findings and recommenda�ons for the Development Area. If infiltra�on is restricted or not feasible in some areas, based on the geotechnical report findings, then capture and reuse, biofiltra�on and/or inlet filters as water quality measures are allowed as treatment control BMPs within the Development Area. All LID and BMP features shall comply with the City of Irwindale Building Code and will require grading and drainage permits from the Building & Safety Division.
8.4 Dry U�li�es
As shown on Figures 8-7 and 8-8, Dry U�li�es, the Development Area will connect to exis�ng dry u�li�es (electric, gas, and communica�on systems) installed within Live Oak Avenue. All dry u�li�es internal to the Development Area will be installed underground in u�lity trenches. The loca�ons of trenches, lateral connec�ons, transformers, switches, pull boxes, and dry u�lity manholes will be determined at the �me Buildings are posi�oned in conjunc�on with implemen�ng development.
A BESS facility may include an onsite “collector” substa�on that would connect via a 230 kV underground electric �e-line to a Point of Interconnec�on (POI) at the exis�ng Southern California Edison (SCE) Edison Rio Hondo Substa�on located south of Live Oak Avenue. The electrical �eline shall be undergrounded unless the applicable agency(ies), including but not limited to Southern California Edison or California Independent System Operator (CALISO), reject the proposed underground line. If the applicable agency(ies) require an overhead �e-line, the Applicant shall be subject to a Zone Variance applica�on per IMC Chapter 17.32. The overhead line would transi�on to underground at a transi�on pole. The underground por�on of the electric �eline would consist of conduits containing electric power cables, fiber op�c communica�ons cable, and a grounding conductor within an approximately 3’-0” wide and 3’-0” deep, high-strength concrete encasement that would be a minimum of 3’-0” below the surface. Impacts related to the undergrounding of the electric �e-line would not result in a net increase of impacts of the proposed projects.
8.5 Solid Waste Disposal
The City currently contracts with Athens Services to provide businesses with a full spectrum of solid waste disposal that includes rou�ne trash removal, recyclable collec�on, organic waste collec�on, bulky item removal (upon request only), and hazardous waste removal. And a restaurant food waste compos�ng pilot program. Accordingly, all refuse collec�on services will be available to the development from Athens Services. The development shall provide trash enclosures to accommodate the size, type, and number of bins required for the uses on site.
78 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-1 – CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN WITH BESS 79
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-2 – CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN WITHOUT BESS 80
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-3 – CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN WITH BESS 81
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-4 – CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN WITHOUT BESS 82
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-5 – CONCEPTUAL STORM WATER MANGEMENT PLAN WITH BESS 83
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-6 – CONCEPTUAL STORM WATER MANGEMENT PLAN WITHOUT BESS 84
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-7 – CONCEPTUAL DRY UTILITIES PLAN WITH BESS 85
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN VIII. UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FIGURE 8-8 – CONCEPTUAL DRY UTILITIES PLAN WITHOUT BESS 86
87 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IX. IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION IX.
88 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IX. IMPLEMENTATION
9. Implementa�on
9.1 Overview
This sec�on establishes the implementa�on and review process required for development proposed within the Specific Plan Area This sec�on provides general administra�ve provisions; review and approval procedures; and implementa�on measures, including short-term and ongoing tasks. The provisions contained in the Specific Plan cons�tute the primary land use and development standards for the Development Area. While the en�re Specific Plan cons�tutes the zoning for the Specific Plan area, Sec�on 6, Development Standards, contains specific zoning regula�ons for the Development Area. Upon adop�on of the Specific Plan by the City of Irwindale, all on- and off-site improvements shall be consistent with the development standards and design guidelines set forth in Sec�ons 6, 7, and 8 of this Specific Plan.
Implementa�on of development within the Development Area shall be subject to City approval of lot line adjustments, site plan review, plot plans, subdivision reviews, building permits, and other planning approvals, and permits that may be required by the City of Irwindale pursuant to the Specific Plan or the City of Irwindale Municipal Code, including compliance with any applicable development standards whether set forth herein or in the City of Irwindale Municipal Code. The implementa�on process described herein provides the procedures for review and approval of development within the Specific Plan Area.
9.2 Severability
If any por�on of this Specific Plan is declared to be invalid or ineffec�ve in whole or in part, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining por�ons hereof. The legisla�ve body hereby declares that they would have enacted these regula�ons and each por�on thereof irrespec�ve of the fact that any one or more por�ons be declared invalid or ineffec�ve.
9.3 Interpreta�ons and Determina�ons
Requests for interpreta�ons of this Specific Plan and verifica�ons rela�ng to prior approvals or permits may be made to the Community Development Director. Requests shall be in wri�ng. The decision of the Community Development Director on such requests may be appealed pursuant to Chapter 17.25 (Common Procedures) of the IMC.
9.4 Site Plan and Design Review
All development within the Development Area shall be subject to Site Plan and Design Review, as set in the Chapter 17.27 (Site Plan and Design Review) of the IMC.
9.5 Condi�onal Use Permits
Condi�onal Use Permits are provided for the individual review of uses at specific loca�ons, as outlined in Table 6-1 to ensure that their opera�on will be compa�ble with surrounding areas and uses.
89 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IX. IMPLEMENTATION
Applica�ons for Condi�onal Use Permits shall be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 17.28 (Use Permits) of the IMC.
9.6 Minor Variance
As part of a Site Plan and Design Review applica�on, the Community Development Director or Planning Commission, as applicable, may grant a minor variance to the development standards listed in the Specific Plan, pursuant to Chapter 17.31 (Minor Variances) of the IMC.
9.7 Amendments to the Specific Plan
All modifica�ons to the Specific Plan that do not meet the criteria of a minor modifica�on (see Sec�on
9.6) or any applicable interpreta�on made pursuant to Sec�on 9.3 shall require an amendment to the Specific Plan Amendments shall be processed in accordance with § 65453, et. seq. of the California Government Code, which requires Specific Plan Amendments be reviewed and adopted in the same manner as a General Plan and Chapter 17.35 of the IMC.
9.8 Subdivision
If a proposed project requires a subdivision, the subdivision shall be consistent with and serve to implement the policies and provisions of the Specific Plan and all applicable City policies and ordinances as required by Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the IMC. All subdivisions shall be authorized through the approval of a map or other approval in compliance with Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the IMC and the California Subdivision Map Act for Land.
9.9 Financing of Development in Development Area
Development in the Specific Plan Area and any off-site improvements to roadways or infrastructure required as condi�ons of approval or mi�ga�on measures iden�fied as part of the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project pursuant to CEQA and adopted by the City shall be privately funded. All development shall be subject to Development Impact Fees and any other applicable fees.
9.10 Maintenance Plan
The public and private improvements constructed within the Specific Plan Area shall be maintained through a combina�on of public and private en��es as described in Table 9-2.
Major infrastructure costs may be offset by public assistance such as a Community Facility District (CFD) or other special districts to provide funding for the construc�on of a variety of public facili�es and the provision of public services. City Council approval is a prerequisite for the implementa�on of all special district-financing mechanisms.
For common areas located within the Development Area, a Private Maintenance Associa�on(s) shall be established with recorded covenants, condi�ons and restric�ons to govern alloca�on of maintenance responsibili�es among property owners. Maintenance of public facili�es shall be the responsibility of the appropriate public agency.
90 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IX. IMPLEMENTATION
TABLE 9-2 | MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
FACILITY
PRIVATE
MAINTENANCE
ASSOCIATION
CITY OF
IRWINDALE
PUBLIC
UTILITY
OTHER
MAINTENANCE
ENTITY1
CIRCULATION & RELATED FACILITIES
Live Oak Avenue
Pavement & Curbs X
Landscaping within public right-ofway, including
medians and parkways
X
Sidewalks X
Pavement & Curbs X
Landscaping within public right-ofway, including
medians and parkways
X
Sidewalks X
Live Oak Lane X
Public Alley X
Private Drive Aisles X
Parking Lots, including
landscaping
X
Traffic Signals3 X
Traffic Signs
Within public right-of-way X
Within private property X
Streetlights
Within public right-of-way X
Within private property X
Truck Traffic Management Plan
Direc�onal Signage
X
LANDSCAPING & RELATED FACILITIES
Common area landscaping, including entry
treatments at Live
Oak Avenue and Arrow Highway
X
Monuments and Signage X
Walls and Fences X
UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE
On-site water facili�es/infrastructure X X
On-site sanitary sewer
facili�es/infrastructure
X X
Private storm water drainage
facili�es/infrastructure
X
Public storm water drainage
facili�es/infrastructure
X X
Dry u�li�es (electricity, natural
gas, communica�ons systems)
X X
91 IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN IX. IMPLEMENTATION
TABLE 9-2 | MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
FACILITY
PRIVATE
MAINTENANCE
ASSOCIATION
CITY OF
IRWINDALE
PUBLIC
UTILITY
OTHER
MAINTENANCE
ENTITY1
Notes:
1. Other Maintenance En��es may include Caltrans, u�lity providers, and other public/private en��es that may maintain billboards and stormwater drainage facili�es on-site.
2. Traffic signals may require maintenance easements for the City to access and maintain the traffic signals.
9.11 California Environmental Quality Act
An Environmental Impact Report (the “EIR”) prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) for the Specific Plan iden�fied environmental impacts associated with the project requiring mi�ga�on.
The EIR iden�fies poten�al impacts resul�ng from development and establishes mi�ga�on measures to reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. As the Lead Agency, the City of Irwindale has adopted a Mi�ga�on Monitoring and Repor�ng Program (MMRP) as part of this Specific Plan.
The EIR will serve as the primary environmental clearance document for the Specific Plan and all future development undertaken within the Specific Plan Area. The EIR is considered the primary environmental clearance document for the implementa�on of the project, including infrastructure, roadway, and any other related on-/off-site improvements. Development applica�ons that require discre�onary review will be examined in consulta�on with the EIR to determine if addi�onal environmental documenta�on is required. No further analysis would be conducted on projects determined to be exempt from CEQA or in full compliance with the adopted EIR. However, the project applicant will be required to submit documenta�on evidencing said development is allowed and in conformance with the Specific Plan and that the poten�al environmental effects are within the parameters analyzed within the EIR.
Resolution No. 2025-01-3589
FEIR, MMRP, SOC
ATTACHMENT “B”
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-01-3589
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IRWINDALE (1)
CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, STATE CLEARING HOUSE (SCH# 2023020290); (2) ADOPTING THE FINDINGS REQUIRED BY CEQA GUIDELINES, SECTION 15091; (3) ADOPTING THE PROPOSED MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; AND (4) ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR THE IRWINDALE GATEWAY
SPECIFIC PLAN
A. RECITALS.
(i) Jeff Dritley, on behalf of KP Irwindale Owner, LLC 1875 Century Park East, Suite 380, Los Angeles, CA 90067, the Applicant, has made the following requests: 1) General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 02-2022 to change the Land Use Designation from Regional Commercial to Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan; 2) Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 02-2023 to adopt the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan; 3) Zone Change (ZC) No. 02-2022 to change the Zoning Map designation from M-2 (Heavy Manufacturing) to Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan; and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 83854 to subdivide the site into seven (7) parcels for property located at 13620 Live Oak Lane – APNs: 8532-002-046 and 8532-002-047; and (ii) The proposed Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan (SP), provides for the planned use and long-term development of the property over the next several years; and
(iii) As a result, the following entitlements are being considered for approval for The Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan:
• Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2023020290)
• General Plan Amendment No. 02-2022
• Zone Ordinance Amendment No. 02-2023
• Zone Change No. 02-2022
• Tentative Parcel Map No. 83854
(iv) In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.4, a Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) was released by the City for public comment on February 10, 2023 and concluded on March 11, 2023. Eleven (11) comments were received during the comment period. The NOP was distributed for public comment to the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research, responsible agencies, and other interested parties for a 30-day public review. During the 30-day comment period, a Public Scoping meeting was held on March 2, 2023 to gather information for the scope of the Draft EIR. The meeting was held in the Senior Center Dining
Resolution No. 2025-01-3589
FEIR, MMRP, SOC
Room (16116 Arrow Highway) at 6:00 PM. The oral and written comments received during the meeting were addressed in the Draft EIR; and (v) Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, and the City of Irwindale environmental guidelines, the City of Irwindale, as the Lead Agency, has analyzed the project and has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the Specific Plan project. The Notice of Availability related to the EIR was released by the City for public comment on May 13, 2024 and concluded on June 27, 2024.
(vi) Said comments were responded through a Comments and Responses section as part of the FEIR for the Specific Plan; and
(vii) A copy of the EIR was circulated through the State Clearinghouse (SCH# 2023020290), posted on the City’s website, and was available at the Irwindale Public Library, City Clerk’s Office, and Community Development Department. A copy of the EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit C) was posted on the project’s dedicated website https://www.irwindaleca.gov/590/13620-Live-Oak-Lane---IrwindaleGateway-; and (viii) The public review period for the Draft EIR ended on June 27, 2024, and ten (10) comments were received during the comment period; and (ix) A Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”), SCH# 2023020290 was prepared for the proposed project, including the Draft EIR, comments received on the Draft EIR and responses to those comments, and revisions and corrections to the Draft EIR made in response to comments received, and CEQA Findings of Fact (FOF) and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) (Exhibit B); and
(x) The FEIR for the proposed Specific Plan provides an assessment of the environmental impacts, alternatives, and mitigation measures associated with the Specific Plan, and has been prepared in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. (CEQA), and State regulations in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq. (CEQA Guidelines); and
(xi) The Planning Commission of the City of Irwindale (Planning Commission) has considered the FEIR and its implementing actions (State Clearinghouse No. SCH# 2023020290) for the Specific Plan, which provides, among other provisions, for the planned use and long-term development of the industrial/commercial business park; and
Resolution No. 2025-01-3589
FEIR, MMRP, SOC
(xii) Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission concerning its consideration of the FEIR was given in accordance with the laws, including CEQA, and policies of the City of Irwindale; and
(xiii) On October 28, 2024, the Irwindale Planning Commission continued the hearing on this item to a date certain (November 26, 2024); and (xiv) The Special Planning Commission Meeting of November 26, 2024 was later rescheduled to November 14, 2024, and
(xv) Revised notices of public hearing were published, posted, and mailed in accordance with the laws, including CEQA, Government Code and policies of the City of Irwindale; and
(xvi) On November 14 ,2024, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan and corresponding General Plan Amendment No. 02-2022, Zone Change No. 02-2022, Zone Ordinance Amendment No. 02-2023, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 83854 , and the FEIR for the Specific Plan (SCH# 2023020290) at which time, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony on the Application, at which time they received input from staff, the Assistant City Attorney, and the Applicant, heard public testimony, discussed the Proposed Project; and closed the public hearing; and (xvii) On December 16, 2024, notice of a public hearing before the City Council on the proposed project adoption, was given in accordance with applicable law; and
(xviii) On January 8, 2025, the City Council continued the hearing on this item to a date certain (January 22, 2025); and
(xix) On January 22, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, on the proposed Application at which time oral and documentary evidence was introduced along with the written recommendation of the City of Irwindale City Council, received public testimony, and directed Staff to revise the draft Specific Plan document, Resolutions and Ordinances to remove all references to Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), and put on the February 26, 2025 Consent Calendar; and
(xx) On February 26, 2025, the City Council directed Staff to revise the draft Specific Plan document, Resolutions and Ordinances to restore all references to Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), and put on the March 12, 2025 Consent Calendar; and
Resolution No. 2025-01-3589
FEIR, MMRP, SOC
(xxi) On March 12, 2025, the City Council adopted the revised Resolutions, Ordinances and Specific Plan document; and
(xxii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Irwindale, having reviewed and considered the information in the certified FEIR and supporting documents and materials, does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows:
1. CITY COUNCIL RECORD RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the City Council at its public hearing on the Final EIR held on February 26, 2025, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents, along with any documents submitted to the decision-makers, including all documents specified under applicable State law shall comprise the entire record of proceedings for any claims under CEQA.
2. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CONTENTS
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines, Section 15132, the FEIR consists of the following:
a. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) or a revision of the Draft; b. Comments and recommendations received on the DEIR either verbatim or in summary;
c. A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies comments on the DEIR;
d. The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process; and
e. Any other information added by the Lead Agency.
(All hereafter collectively referred to as “FEIR”)
3. ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS TO FEIR.
Documents that shall accompany the FEIR are:
a. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
b. Findings of Fact; and
c. Statement of Overriding Considerations
Resolution No. 2025-01-3589
FEIR, MMRP, SOC
4. CITY COUNCIL REGARDING CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
a. Adoption of Findings of Fact. The City Council approves, accepts as its own, incorporates as if set forth in full herein, and make each and every one of the findings contained in the Findings of Fact, attached as Exhibit “B” of this Resolution.
b. Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report. The City Council hereby certifies that (1) the FEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; (2) that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in the FEIR prior to approving the project; and (3) that the FEIR reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis. .
c. Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. As more fully identified and set forth in FEIR and in the Findings of Fact for this Project, which is Exhibit “B” to this Resolution, the City Council finds that the Mitigation Measures described and specifically identified in the above referenced documents are feasible and shall become binding upon the entity (such as the project proponent or the City) assigned thereby to implement the particular Mitigation Measures as identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
d. Adoption Statement of Overriding Considerations. Even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures and, certain significant or potentially significant environmental effects caused by the Project directly, or cumulatively, will remain. Therefore, the City Council hereby issues and adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations in the form set forth in the attached Exhibit “B” a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, identifying the specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other considerations that render the unavoidable significant adverse environmental effects acceptable, either in its current form or as may be modified or amended by the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council and to the Applicant.
The Secretary shall:
a. Certify to the adoption of this Resolution; and
b. Forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by mail, to the Applicant at the address of record set forth in the Application.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of March 2025.
Resolution No. 2025-01-3589
FEIR, MMRP, SOC
Larry G. Burrola, Mayor
ATTEST:
Laura M. Nieto, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss.
CITY OF IRWINDALE }
I, Laura M. Nieto, Chief Deputy City Clerk of the City of Irwindale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-01-3589 was adopted at a regular meeting of the Irwindale City Council held on the 12th day of March 2025, by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Laura M. Nieto, MMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Exhibits:
A. Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2023020290)
https://www.irwindaleca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9569/Irwindale-Gateway-FEIR10282024-FINAL-w-appendices B. CEQA Findings of Fact which include: Impacts Determined to be Less Than Significant; Impacts Mitigated to Less Than Significant; Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts; Alternatives Considered and Rejected; and Statement of Overriding Considerations
https://www.irwindaleca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9604/Irwindale-GatewayFOF-SOC-FINAL-10142024 C. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
https://www.irwindaleca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9605/Irwindale-Gateway-MMRPFINAL-10242024
EXHIBIT “A”
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR)
WITH APPENDICES
https://www.irwindaleca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9569
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR)
WITHOUT APPENDICES
https://www.irwindaleca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9603
EXHIBIT “B”
CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT (FOF)
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS (SOC)
https://www.irwindaleca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9604
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 1 -
CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT
AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
REGARDING THE
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR THE
IRWINDALE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2023020290
I. INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that a number of written findings be made by the lead agency in connection with certification of an environmental impact report (“EIR”) prior to approval of the project pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code. The State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 provides:
(a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding.
The possible findings are:
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR.
2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency.
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record.
(c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives.
The finding in subsection (a)(3) shall describe the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 2 -
(d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. (e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based.
(f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings required by this section.
Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines “feasible” to mean “capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.” CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds another factor: “legal” considerations. (See Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 (Goleta II).) The concept of “feasibility” also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative or mitigation measure promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957, 1001 [“an alternative ‘may be found infeasible on the ground it is inconsistent with the project objectives as long as the finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record’”].) An alternative may also be rejected because it “would not ‘entirely fulfill’ [a] project objective.” Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 296, 314-315.) “[F]easibility” under CEQA encompasses ‘desirability’ to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.” (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 715.)
With respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's “benefits” rendered “acceptable” its “unavoidable adverse environmental effects.” (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (b).) The California Supreme Court has stated, “[t]he wisdom of approving . . . any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced.” (Goleta II, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 576.)
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 3 -
When adopting Statements of Overriding Considerations, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 further provides:
(a) CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable
environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposal project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered “acceptable.”
(b) Where the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record.
(c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091.
Having received, independently reviewed, and considered the Draft Environmental Impact Report (“Draft EIR”) and the Final Environmental Impact Report (“Final EIR”) for the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project, SCH No. 2023020290 (collectively, the “EIR”), as well as all other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, the following Findings of Facts (“Findings”) are hereby adopted by the City of Irwindale (“City”) in its capacity as the CEQA Lead Agency.
These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the City for adoption and implementation of the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan (“proposed project” or “Specific Plan”). This action includes the certification of the following:
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2023020290 A. DOCUMENT FORMAT
These Findings have been organized into the following sections:
1) Section I provides an introduction.
2) Section II provides a summary of the project, overview of the discretionary actions required for approval of the project, and a statement of the project’s objectives.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 4 -
3) Section III provides a summary of previous environmental reviews related to the project area that took place prior to the environmental review done specifically for the project, and a summary of public participation in the environmental review for the project.
4) Section IV sets forth findings regarding the environmental impacts that were determined to be—as a result of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and consideration of comments received during the NOP comment period—either not relevant to the project or clearly not at levels that were deemed significant for consideration given the nature and location of the proposed project.
5) Section V sets forth findings regarding significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the Draft EIR that the City has determined are either not significant or can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through the imposition of project design features and/or mitigation measures. In order to ensure compliance and implementation, all of these measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) for the project and adopted as conditions of the project by the Lead Agency. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to project design features and/or mitigation measures, these findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable level. Section 5 also includes findings regarding those significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the Draft EIR that will or may result from the project and which the City has determined cannot feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level.
6) Section VI sets forth findings regarding alternatives to the proposed project. 7) Section VII sets forth the Statement of Overriding Considerations which discusses the economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits of the proposed project and compares these to the project’s unavoidable environmental risks.
B. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the Proposed Project consists of the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum:
The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the proposed project
The Draft EIR for the proposed project
The Final EIR for the proposed project
All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft EIR
All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft EIR
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 5 -
All written and verbal public testimony presented during a noticed public hearing for the proposed project
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The reports and technical memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments
All documents, studies, EIRs, or other materials incorporated by reference in the Draft EIR and Final EIR
The Resolutions adopted by the City of Irwindale in connection with the proposed project, and all documents incorporated by reference therein, including comments received after the close of the comment period and responses thereto Matters of common knowledge to the City of Irwindale, including but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations
Any documents expressly cited in these Findings
Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e)
The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of Irwindale Community Development Department. The custodian for these documents is the City of Irwindale. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e).
C. CUSTODIAN AND LOCATION OF RECORDS
The documents and other materials that constitute the administrative record for the City’s actions related to the project are at the City of Irwindale Community Development Department – Planning Division, 16102 Arrow Highway, Irwindale, CA 91706. The City’s Community Development Department – Planning Division is the custodian of the administrative record for the project. Copies of these documents, which constitute the record of proceedings, are and at all relevant times have been and will be available upon request at the City of Irwindale Community Development office. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e).
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 6 -
II. PROJECT SUMMARY
The Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan (Specific Plan) outlines two (2) options for the development of the project site, both of which are outlined in the Specific Plan. Both options involve developing the project site as an industrial logistics and distribution center, however, Option 2 would develop a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) on a portion of the site, discussed below. The impacts associated with these two options are discussed and analyzed separately throughout the Draft EIR.
Prior to implementation of the Specific Plan, a majority of the site will have undergone reclamation pursuant to the Nu-Way Live Oak Reclamation Operations Plan. The Operations Plan for site reclamation was approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in September 2022 and the rough grading plan for the reclamation was approved by the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works in September 2022. These reclamation activities are currently underway and the rough graded site per the Operations Plan serves as the baseline for analysis in the Draft EIR.
The Specific Plan includes details, regulations, and conditions necessary for Specific Plans pursuant to California Government Code Section 65451, including:
The distribution and location of housing, agriculture, and open space, together with regulations establishing height, bulk, and setback limits for such buildings and facilities, including the location of areas such as floodplains or excessively steep or unstable terrain.
Standards for existing and proposed transportation, sewage, water, and drainage. Standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, including the prevention, control, and correction of soil erosion caused by subdivision roads or any other sources, and the protection of watershed areas.
A. PROJECT LOCATION
The Specific Plan site is at 13620 Live Oak Lane in the central portion of the City of Irwindale in Los Angeles County. The project site is bordered by Interstate 605 (I-605) to the west, Live Oak Lane to the north and east, and Live Oak Avenue to the south. The Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) for the project site are 8532-002-046 and 8532-002- 047. There is also a 9.61-acre Southern California Edison (SCE) easement on the project site. The project site encompasses a former sand and gravel quarry, the NuWay Live Oak Inert Landfill (NuWay Landfill), and a former street-cleaning business.
The site does not include the industrial uses (APNs 8532-002-036, 8532-002-040, and 8532-002-043) that are between the northeast part of the project site and Live Oak Lane, nor does the site boundary include the parcel owned by the Valley County Water District (APN 8532-002-904) at the southeastern corner of the project site.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 7 -
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Option 1
Option 1 of the Specific Plan would include a 52.65-acre parcel developed as an industrial logistics and distribution center with three buildings and associated parking and loading docks. The remaining 13.99 acres of the site would be used for public rights-of-way and the SCE easement that runs from north to south along the western portion of the site. The three buildings would allow a maximum of 997,796 square feet of building space—954,796 square feet of warehouse space and 43,000 square feet of office space. Trailer, truck, and/or car parking would be included throughout the project site.
Option 2
Option 2 would include a 36.71-acre parcel developed as an industrial logistics and distribution center with two warehousing/office buildings and a 15.94-acre parcel for the 400-megawatt BESS (electric energy storage, transmission and AC/DC and voltage conversion). The two buildings would allow a maximum of 704,070 square feet—668,070 square feet of warehouse space and 36,000 square feet of office space. The preliminary design for the BESS has 353,000 square feet of battery arrays, within which battery enclosures, inverter enclosures, and medium voltage transformers would be arranged.
The BESS would be served by an undergrounded electrical tie-line unless applicable agencies (Southern California Edison or California Independent System Operator (CALISO)) require an overhead line. If required, an overhead electric tie-line would consist of three 220-kilovolt conductor cables below an optical ground wire that serves dual purposes of grounding and fiber optic communications An overhead line would be subject to a Zone Variance application per IMC Chapter 17.32.
C. DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS AND APPROVALS
Project development requires the following discretionary actions and approvals from the City:
Certification of the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan EIR Approval of City of Irwindale General Plan Amendment
Approval of City of Irwindale Zone Change
Approval of City of Irwindale Zone Ordinance Amendment (adopting the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan)
Approval of Tentative Parcel Map
Certification of the Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2023020290 Adoption of Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 8 -
Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program D. STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES
1. Create a comprehensive master plan for the re-use of a reclaimed sand and gravel quarry, including the development of a utility-scale battery energy storage system.
2. Provide state-of-the-art buildings that can accommodate various industrial and manufacturing uses, including warehouse distribution, logistics, and fulfillment centers with proximate access to Interstate 605 on- and off-ramps.
3. Ensure that infrastructure plans for water, sewer, and drainage are adequately designed for the Specific Plan.
4. Provide a circulation system that meets transportation requirements and minimizes potential adverse impacts on the surrounding area.
5. Provide guidelines and standards for architecture, landscaping, walls, fencing, lighting, and entry treatments that are compatible with the design and architecture of the surrounding uses.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS In conformance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive environmental review of the Proposed Project. The City of Irwindale determined that an EIR would be required for the Proposed Project and issued a Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) on February 10, 2023. The NOP was sent to all responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and the Office of Planning Research and posted at the Los Angeles County Clerk-Recorder’s office and on the City’s website on February 10, 2023. The thirty (30)-day public review period extended from February 10, 2023, to March 11, 2023. However, because the scoping meeting was held relatively close to the end date of the comment period, the local comment period was extended to March 18, 2023, to give local individuals and organizations one additional week to submit comments.
A scoping meeting was held during the NOP review period to solicit additional suggestions on the scope of the Draft EIR. The scoping meeting was held on Thursday March 2, 2023 at 6:00 PM at the Irwindale Community Center. The notice of the public scoping meeting was included in the NOP. Oral and written comments were received during the meeting.
The scope of the Draft EIR was determined based on the City’s comments received in response to the NOP. Section 2.3 of the DEIR describes the issues identified for analysis in the Draft EIR.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 9 -
The City of Irwindale prepared a Draft EIR, which was made available for a forty-five (45)-day public review period beginning Monday, May 13, 2024 and ending Thursday, June 27, 2024.
The complete Draft EIR consists of the analysis of the Specific Plan and all referenced appendices. The Notice of Availability (“NOA”) for the Draft EIR was sent to all interested persons, agencies, and organizations. The Notice of Completion (“NOC”) was sent to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento for distribution to public agencies. The NOA was posted at the Los Angeles County Clerk-Recorder’s office and published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on May 13, 2024. Copies of the Draft EIR were made available for public review at the City of Irwindale City Hall, Irwindale Public Library, and Irwindale Community Development -- Planning Division. The Draft EIR was also made available for download via the City’s website:
https://www.irwindaleca.gov/590/13620-Live-Oak-Lane---Irwindale-Gateway A special meeting of the City of Irwindale Planning Commission is scheduled for October 28, 2024, at 6:30 PM. The meeting will be held in the City of Irwindale Council Chambers, located at 5050 Irwindale Avenue, Irwindale, CA 91706, and online via Zoom.
Section 15088(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (State CEQA Guidelines requires lead agencies to provide written Responses to Comments to public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR at least 10 days prior to certifying the Final EIR. Seven comment letters were received from public agencies.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 10 -
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT WERE DETERMINED NOT TO BE
POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT
A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT DURING THE
SCOPING PROCESS
Based on the public scoping process (including review of NOP responses), in addition to analysis prepared for the Draft EIR, the City determined, based upon the threshold criteria for significance, that none of the environmental topics were determined to have no impact or were found to be less than significant. As a result, all environmental topics were analyzed in Chapter 5 of the EIR.
B. IMPACTS DETERMINED AS “NO IMPACT” AND “LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS” IN THE EIR
This section identifies impacts of the proposed project determined to be less than significant without implementation of project-specific mitigation measures. This determination assumes compliance with existing regulations, as detailed in each respective topical section of Chapter 5 and Chapter 8, Impacts Found Not to Be Significant, in the Draft EIR.
a) Aesthetics. Implementation of the proposed project under Option 1 or 2 would not obstruct existing views of the San Gabriel Mountains and Puente Hills from surrounding roadways that abut the project site due to the substantially higher elevation of the mountains when compared to the proposed buildings and BESS infrastructure. Additionally, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would ensure that the proposed development does not conflict with aesthetic related zoning regulations. The Specific Plan also provides standards for lighting and glare to ensure that project development does not adversely affect surrounding receptors. Furthermore, there would be no impacts to scenic corridors or highways since none exist within the vicinity of the project site. b) Agricultural and Forestry Resources. Most of the project site is a former sand and gravel quarry and inert landfill and is currently undergoing remedial grading operations. As such, the project site does not contain any existing agricultural uses, land designated as important farmland by the California Department of Conservation, Williamson Act contracts, or forest/timberland resources. Therefore, development of the site under either Option 1 or 2 would have no impact on agricultural and forestry resources.
c) Air Quality. The proposed project would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (AQMD’s) localized significance thresholds for construction and operational emissions under either Option 1 or Option 2. Additionally, the qualified health risk from construction and operational emissions would not exceed South Coast AQMD’s cancer risk and chronic hazards thresholds for either Option 1 or Option 2. The potential health risk associated with a thermal runaway event
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 11 -
of lithium-ion battery systems from the BESS was also evaluated and was determined unlikely to result in substantial toxic air contaminant concentrations for sensitive receptors.
d) Biological Resources. The project site is a former sand and gravel quarry and inert landfill. It has been highly disturbed over the last 65 years, with mining on the site commencing in 1957. A majority of the project site is currently undergoing remedial grading operations. The proposed project would not disturb any area that was not previously disturbed by reclamation activities, and the SCE easement would remain undeveloped under proposed conditions. Areas disturbed by reclamation activities have no habitat suitable for the two special species of concern that have been observed and recorded within a mile of the project site, the coast horned lizard or coastal whiptail. Additionally, while the project site is
0.34 miles southwest of the San Gabriel Canyon Significant Ecological Area which provides critical habitat for southwestern willow flycatcher, no suitable habitat for the species exists on the project site and no trees would be removed from the project site during implementation of the Specific Plan. Additionally, the project site does not contain sensitive natural communities or viable riparian habitat that is considered a protected wetland. Project development would take place within the boundaries of the project site and adjacent urban lands to the south including Live Oak Avenue and the Rio Hondo substation and would not impact the San Gabriel River or Santa Fe Flood Control Dam. The proposed project was concluded to have less than significant impacts to biological resources under both Options 1 and 2.
e) Cultural Resources. The proposed project would have no impact on historic resources since no historic resources exist on the project site. Additionally, while grading activities under construction of the proposed project have the potential to unearth human remains, existing laws and regulations outline specific procedures in the event of these discoveries that ensure that impacts under both Option 1 and Option 2 are less than significant.
f) Energy. The proposed project would not result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation for Option 1 or Option
2. Energy use associated with construction would be temporary. Construction contractors would be required to minimize nonessential idling of construction equipment during construction in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Chapter 9, Article 4.8, Section 2449. Additionally, under Option 2, the proposed project would facilitate greater use of renewable energy sources, therefore decreasing reliance on fossil fuels. All land uses under the proposed project would also comply with the Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the California Green Building Code (CALGreen).
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 12 -
g) Geology and Soils. The project site is not located on or near any active surface faults or liquefaction hazard zones. While seismic activity in the project area could lead to ground-shaking, project buildings would comply with California Building Code (CBC) standards. Additionally, the grading to be conducted as part of the Operations Plan prior to implementation of the proposed project would ensure that uneven and unstable ground is filled and that the project site is flat. Erosion resulting from construction of the proposed project would be reduced with compliance with a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Irwindale Municipal Code (IMC) and CBC standards. Subsequent geotechnical evaluation would identify engineering recommendations based on final project design, and mandatory compliance with the recommendations of the geotechnical evaluation would ensure impacts associated with other soil hazards including compressible soils, unstable soils, and subsidence would be less than significant for Options 1 and 2. Additionally, either version of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to paleontological resources since the project site is covered by a thick layer of artificial fill. If the grading activities extend into the native alluvium, paleontological resources could be impacted by the project, though the likelihood is low.
h) Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Neither option of the proposed project would conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, which include the California Air Resources Board 2022 Scoping Plan and the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG’s) Regional Transportation and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). For example, the proposed project would comply with the Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen in addition to supporting GHG emissions reduction measures through the development of BESS under Option 2.
Additional ways that the proposed project would support the scoping plan and the RTP/SCS are discussed on page 5.6-24 of the Draft EIR.
i) Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Both options of the proposed project would comply with all applicable regulations to ensure that the use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials under the proposed project would not result in significant impacts. This includes specific fire safety requirements for BESS that are discussed in detail under Impact 5.7-1 of the Draft EIR. Additionally, all existing recognized environmental conditions at the project site would be remediated with impacts being reduced to less than significant under implementation of the Operations Plan. The proposed project would also result in less than significant impacts with respect to emergency service and evacuation access with plan review by the City’s Building and Safety Department, along with the Los Angeles County Fire Department and Irwindale Police Department, to ensure adequate site access is maintained and that project driveways would not interfere with circulation on adjacent streets. The project site is not within proximity to an airport and no conditions under the proposed project would exacerbate fire risk.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 13 -
j) Hydrology and Water Quality. Both options of the proposed project would be required to implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and comply with the Municipal Code, the erosion control plan, and grading requirements throughout the construction phase of the development accommodated by the Specific Plan. These regulatory requirements would address anticipated pollutants of concern from construction activities. Pursuant to the State Construction General Permit, the MS4 Permit, the Statewide General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, Chapter 8.28 of the City’s Municipal Code, and requirements of Sections 404 and 401 of the CWA, the Specific Plan would be required to implement federal, State, and local water quality standards; construction phase BMPs; post-construction site design, treatment, and source control measures to help keep pollutants out of stormwater. Additionally, the proposed project would not interfere with groundwater recharge, since the proposed project would have sufficient water supply from the project’s water provider Valley County Water District (VCWD). The preliminary hydrology report for the proposed project shows that the that the proposed basin for the project site regulates peak flows from the 50-Year 24-Hour storm event so that the post-development runoff does not exceed 1 cubic-feet-second/acre. The project site is not subject to flooding hazards. k) Land Use and Planning. Neither option under the proposed project would physically divide an existing community. The proposed uses are generally consistent with the land use currently operating on adjacent properties and the project site does not provide access to established communities. An analysis of the project’s consistency with relevant plans including the SCAG RTP/SCS, Irwindale General Plan, and Irwindale Zoning Code included in Table 5.9-1, SCAG 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Goals Consistency Analysis, and Table 5.9-2, General Plan Consistency Analysis, of the Draft EIR. The Specific Plan would be consistent with the applicable policies and goals of these plans.
l) Mineral Resources. The project site is in an area designated MRZ-2 and the Irwindale Production Area, however, the site is designated with land uses incompatible with mining in the San Gabriel P-C region and no active mining operations are present on the project site. Furthermore, there are no active mining operations on-site, and past mining operations depleted mineral resources at the project site. There would be no impacts to mineral resources under either option of the proposed project.
m) Noise. Construction associated with either option under the proposed project would generate noise-level increases from 0.2 to 0.3 dBA Leq at the nearest receiver locations which would not exceed the 5 dBA threshold for noise increases, consistent with the Irwindale Municipal Code. Additionally, operational noise levels would not exceed 5 dBA for either Option 1 or Option 2 at the nearest receptor locations. Similarly, traffic noise levels as a result of traffic added by the proposed project would not exceed the incremental noise level increase thresholds. Vibration
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 14 -
impacts from construction equipment would not result in damage to nearby receptors.
n) Population and Housing. The proposed project would not result in any new housing in the City but is expected to add approximately 580 long-term new jobs under Option 1 and 475 long-term new jobs under Option 2. These jobs are expected to be filled by residents in the City and region. No direct population growth would occur. Additionally, no housing exists at the project site and therefore no residents or homes would be displaced by the proposed project. o) Public Services. The Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) would provide fire service to the project site and anticipates that the proposed project would not have a significant impact on the service demands of the station that serves the proposed project. The BESS would be subject to LACFD review and would be required to comply with fire code requirements specific to energy storage systems. The Irwindale Police Department noted that the proposed project would not require expansion of police protection facilities. School and library services would not be impacted by the proposed project because the project would not generate population growth.
p) Recreation. Recreational uses under the proposed project would not be impacted by the proposed project since the project does not involve uses that would generate population in the City.
q) Transportation. Neither option under the proposed project would impact City circulation systems. A Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted for the proposed project and is included as Appendix L2 to the Draft EIR which concluded that signalization at the intersection of Live Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane would be needed to address traffic impacts from both options of the proposed project. The proposed project would also provide pedestrian amenities and bicycle parking facilities both on the project site and within the surrounding right-of-way, supporting the City’s implementation of its Active Transportation Plan. Additionally, the proposed project would not create roadway hazards or result in inadequate emergency access to the project site. The development would comply with fire and building codes, and circulation plans would be reviewed by the Planning Division and LACFD. Furthermore, consistent with the Specific Plan, prior to the issuance of building permits for development projects in the project site that involve a driveway connection point on Live Oak Avenue, the project applicant shall submit a driveway access study to the Irwindale Public Works Department for City review and approval.
r) Utilities and Service Systems. As discussed in the analysis of Impact 5.15-1 and the Sewer Area Study for the proposed project, the existing wastewater infrastructure serving the project site would be able to accommodate the additional flows from development under the Specific Plan. Wastewater from the project site
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 15 -
would be treated at the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant which has capacity to accommodate the wastewater from the proposed project. The total water demand for the project site is anticipated to be 101 acre-feet-year, accounting for water losses, which falls within the residual water supplies available to VCWD. Impacts to stormwater drainage would be less than significant with implementation of the on-site detention basin and the modular wetlands systems at the project site, as discussed further in Sections 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality, and Section 5.15, Utilities and Service Systems, of the Draft EIR. Solid waste disposal under the proposed project would be required to comply with various federal, state, and local laws and regulations that govern solid waste disposal. Additionally, the two (2) landfills that would serve the proposed project would have capacity to serve the proposed project. While the Specific Plan would increase energy demand at the site compared to existing conditions, all development would be required to comply with the latest applicable Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen. The proposed project would represent negligible increases to the natural gas and electricity consumption of its service area.
s) Wildfire. The project site is not in a high Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) or very high FHSZ but is adjacent to a very high FHSZ. However, the project site is separated from this FHSZ area due to roadways which would act as fire breaks.
The electrical infrastructure of the BESS would undergo maintenance to ensure that there is no fuel buildup that would exacerbate fire risk on- or off-site. The proposed project would therefore not exacerbate fire risk.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 16 -
V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS
The following potentially significant environmental impacts were analyzed in the Draft EIR, and the effects of the project were considered. Because of environmental analysis of the project and the identification of relevant General Plan policies; compliance with existing laws, codes, and statutes; and the identification of feasible mitigation measures, some potentially significant impacts have been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, and the City has found—in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) (1)—that “Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.” This is referred to herein as “Finding 1.” Where the City has determined—pursuant to CEQA Section 21081(a)(2) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(2)—that “Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency,” the City’s finding is referred to herein as “Finding 2.” Where, as a result of the environmental analysis of the project, the City has determined that either (1) even with the identification of project design features, compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, and/or the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant, or (2) no feasible mitigation measures or alternatives are available to mitigate the potentially significant impact, the City has found in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3) that “Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.” This is referred to herein as “Finding 3.”
A. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT
The following summary describes impacts of the Proposed Project that, without mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the EIR, these impacts would be considered less than significant.
1. Air Quality
Impact 5.2-4: The proposed project would result in other emissions that would adversely affect a substantial number of people. [Threshold AQ-4] Construction
During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust and application of asphalt and architectural coatings would temporarily generate odors. Any construction-related odor emissions would be temporary and intermittent. Additionally, noxious odors would be
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 17 -
confined to the immediate vicinity of the construction equipment. By the time such emissions reached any sensitive receptor sites, they would be diluted to well below any level of air quality concern. Furthermore, short-term construction-related odors are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening of odor-producing materials. Therefore, impacts associated with construction-generated odors are considered less than significant for both Option 1 and Option 2 of the proposed project.
Operation
The type of facilities that are considered to have objectionable odors include wastewater treatment plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. The types of businesses accommodated under the proposed project could result in these types of uses: asphalt plants, automobile and truck repair garages, bakeries and confectionaries (manufacturing and wholesale), bottling plants, computer and electronic parts manufacturing, concrete manufacturing, distribution warehousing and e-commerce fulfillment centers for dry and frozen goods, machinery manufacturing, and product assembly. While these and other types of industrial land uses associated with the proposed project would be required to comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 402, additional measures may be necessary to prevent an odor nuisance. Therefore, certain types of industrial land uses that could be associated with either option of the proposed project may generate potentially significant odor impacts to a substantial number of people.
Mitigation Measure
AQ-2 Prior to future discretionary approval, if it is determined that a project has the potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan shall be prepared by the project applicant, subject to review and approval by the City of Irwindale Community Development Department.
Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include but are not limited to:
Wastewater treatment plants
Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities
Fiberglass manufacturing facilities
Painting/coating operations
Large-capacity coffee roasters
Food-processing facilities
The odor management plan shall show compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The odor management plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include,
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 18 -
but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan.
Finding:
Finding 1 – The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure(s) above. The City of Irwindale hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure(s) is feasible, and the measure(s) is therefore adopted.
2. Cultural Resources
Impact 5.4-2: Development of the project could impact archaeological resources. [Threshold C-2]
The project site is a former sand and gravel quarry and inert landfill. The project site has been highly disturbed over the last approximately 65 years with mining on the site commencing in 1957. When mining operations ceased in approximately 1973, the depleted quarry pits extended to a maximum depth of approximately 120 feet below ground surface. The Nu-Way Live Oak Inert Landfill operated on the site from approximately 1996 to 2005. Under landfill operation, the former quarry was backfilled with inert materials to its capacity at street level. The site operations plan for reclamation describes the excavation, screening, and placement of approximately 8.3 million cubic yards of fill material. Under the operations plan, existing fill is being excavated to a maximum depth of 120 feet. Excavated materials will be screened for noncompliant materials, which will be segregated and disposed of.
The results of the California Historical Resources Information System records search indicated that there are no archeological resources on the project site or within a 0.25-mile radius. Additionally, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) responded on April 21, 2023, with a negative Sacred Lands File search, indicating no record for the presence of Native American sacred land within the project site. Although the project site has a low potential for archaeological resources, previously unidentified subsurface (buried) resources could potentially be uncovered during ground-disturbing activity in areas that have not been excavated during the reclamation activities and for off-site improvements. If such archaeological resources are encountered during project construction, there could be an adverse change of an archaeological resource, resulting in a significant impact. These impacts would apply under both Option 1 and Option 2 of the proposed project. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 would be implemented as part of the proposed project to mitigate this impact to less-than-significant.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 19 -
Mitigation Measures:
The following mitigation measures reduce this impact to less than significant:
CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of any permits allowing ground-disturbing activities, the project proponent/operator shall retain a Qualified Archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for professional archaeology (U.S. Department of the Interior, 2011), to carry out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources. The contact information for this Qualified Archaeologist shall be provided to the City of Irwindale Community Development Department - Planning Division prior to the commencement of any construction activities on-site.
CUL-2 In the event that unanticipated cultural resources are encountered during any phase of project construction, all construction work within 50 feet of the find shall cease, and the Qualified Archaeologist and designated Native American representative, as defined in Mitigation Measure TCR-2, shall assess the find for importance. Construction activities may continue in other areas. If the discovery is determined to not be significant by the Qualified Archaeologist and/or designated Native American representative, work will be permitted to continue in the area.
If a find is determined to be important by the Qualified Archaeologist and designated Native American representative, he or she shall immediately notify the City. The City shall consult on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment measures if the find is determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agency, through consultation as appropriate, determines that the site either: (1) is not eligible for the CRHR; or (2) treatment measures have been completed to its satisfaction.
Finding:
Finding 1 – The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure(s) above. The City of Irwindale hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure(s) is feasible, and the measure(s) is therefore adopted.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 20 -
3. Transportation
Impact 5.13-2: Development accommodated by the Specific Plan would conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). [Threshold T-2]
Both Options 1 and 2 of the Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan include proposed development of industrial warehousing, associated parking, and loading docks. The project site is currently a vacant lot that is used for a variety of industrial and commercial uses as well as stockpiled materials and debris. Option 1 includes the development of 954,796 square feet of warehouse space and 43,000 square feet of office space. A variety of general warehousing and manufacturing tenants could be accommodated in the three (3) buildings. Option 2 would include two (2) industrial buildings providing 668,070 square feet of warehouse space and 36,000 square feet of office space. Additionally, this option would include a 400-megawatt BESS on approximately 16 acres.
As shown in Table 5.13-1, Project VMT Characteristics, in the Draft EIR, the proposed project would result in 20.8 daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) per employee for both Options 1 and 2, which would exceed the City’s threshold of 18.5 daily VMT per employee.
Therefore, impacts would be potentially significant without mitigation for both Option 1 and Option 2.
However, as shown in Table 5.13-1, with the implementation of Mitigation Measures T-1 and T-2 the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Regional VMT Analysis Tool forecasts the project’s VMT to be reduced to 18.4 daily VMT per employee using industry standards measures of effectiveness for VMT reduction measures within the geographic context of the project. The VMT per employee value is below the City’s threshold.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measure:
The following mitigation measures would reduce this impact to less than significant:
T-1 The applicant shall coordinate with Foothill Transit and the City of Irwindale to install a bus stop at Live Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane for the Foothill Transit Line 492. The design and installation of the bus stop shall be coordinated with Foothill Transit and shall be paid for by the project applicant. The bus stop shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first development project on the project site.
T-2 The applicant shall modify the public sidewalk and landscaping along the north side of the portion of Live Oak Avenue that abuts the project site to include accommodation of a Class IV trail consistent with the City of Irwindale Active Transportation Plan to create a portion of the connection to the San Gabriel River Trail. Prior to the issuance of grading plans, the applicant shall submit
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 21 -
the required improvement plans for the Class IV trail to the City of Irwindale’s Public Works Department for review and approval.
Finding:
Finding 1 – The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure(s) above. The City of Irwindale hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure(s) is feasible, and the measure(s) is therefore adopted.
4. Tribal Cultural Resources
Impact 5.14-2: The proposed project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is determined by the lead agency to be significant pursuant to criteria in Public Resources Code section 5024.1(c). [Threshold TCR-1.ii]
The Sacred Lands File (SLF) search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) did not indicate the presence of known Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) within or immediately adjacent to the project site. However, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians–Kizh Nation indicated that the project area is of high importance to the tribe and that there is the potential for unknown and/or buried TCRs to be encountered during construction activities. Should such resources be determined by the lead agency to be significant, the proposed project could result in potentially significant impacts related to the substantial adverse change in the significance of TCRs. Mitigation Measures CUL1, CUL-2, and TCR-1 through TCR-3 would be implemented as part of the proposed project to mitigate this impact to less than significant. This potential impact applies to both Option 1 and Option 2 and these mitigation measures would be implemented under either option of the proposed project.
Mitigation Measure:
In addition to the following mitigation measures, implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-2 would reduce impacts to less than significant.
TCR-1 The project applicant shall retain a Native American monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians–Kizh Nation. The monitor shall be retained prior to the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity for the subject project at all project locations (i.e., both on-site and any off-site locations that are included in the project description/definition and/or required in connection with the project, such as public improvement work). Grounddisturbing activity shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 22 -
A copy of the executed monitoring agreement shall be submitted to the lead agency prior to the earlier of the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity, or the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a grounddisturbing activity.
The monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground-disturbing activities; the type of construction activities performed; locations of ground-disturbing activities; soil types; cultural-related materials; and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered tribal cultural resources, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc. (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or TCRs) as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs shall be provided to the project applicant/lead agency upon written request to the Tribe.
On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a designated point of contact for the project applicant/lead agency that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the project site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Kizh to the project applicant/lead agency that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the project site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs.
TCR-2 Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist. The Kizh shall recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural, and/or historic purposes.
TCR-3 Native American human remains are defined in Public Resources Code 5097.98(d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.
If Native American human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized on the project site, then Public Resources Code 5097.9 as well as Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 shall be followed. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code Sections 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment for discovered human remains and/or burial
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 23 -
goods. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.
Finding:
Finding 1 – The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure(s) above. The City of Irwindale hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure(s) is feasible, and the measure(s) is therefore adopted.
B. SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS THAT CANNOT
BE MITIGATED TO BELOW THE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The following summary describes the unavoidable adverse impacts of the Proposed Project where either mitigation measures were found to be infeasible, or the mitigation measures are under the control of another lead agency. The following impacts would remain significant and unavoidable:
1. Air Quality
Impact 5.2-1: The proposed project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan (the South Coast AQMD AQMP). [Threshold AQ-1]
Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-27 of the Draft EIR.
Though the proposed project would result in an increase in employment, it would not cause the City to reach or exceed the number of jobs forecast by SCAG. And because the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is based on the SCAG forecasts, the proposed project would not substantially conflict with the emissions inventory in the current 2022 AQMP.
Long-term emissions generated by the proposed project would produce criteria air pollutants that exceed the South Coast AQMD significance thresholds for VOC and NOX during the proposed project Option 1 operations, and for NOx only during Option 2 operations (see Impact 5.2-3). South Coast AQMD’s significance thresholds identify whether a project has the potential to cumulatively contribute to the Southern California Air Basin’s (SoCAB’s) nonattainment designations. Implementation of the proposed project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations; cause or contribute to new violations; or delay timely attainment of the Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). Therefore, overall, the proposed project (Options 1 and 2) would be considered inconsistent with the AQMP, and impacts would be potentially significant.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 24 -
Mitigation Measures:
The following feasible measures are required to be implemented:
AQ-1 The construction contractor shall specify in the construction bid that the construction contractor(s) shall only use interior and exterior paints with a low VOC (volatile organic compound) content with a maximum concentration of 0 grams per liter (g/L) for building architectural coating during construction and for future coating to reduce VOC emissions. All building and site plans shall note use of paints with a maximum VOC concentration of 0 g/L. Prior to construction, the construction contractor(s) shall ensure that all construction plans submitted to the City of Irwindale Building and Safety Department and the Community Development Department clearly show this requirement.
GHG-2 Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for a new tenant/business entity, the new tenant/business entity shall provide documentation to the City demonstrating the proposed project’s buildings would consume 100 percent carbon-free electricity, when feasible and commercially available in accordance with Southern California Edison’s approved programs in effect at the time the tenant/business entity seeks issuance of an occupancy permit.
Measures to achieve 100 percent carbon-free electricity use for the proposed project’s buildings may include, but are not limited to, plans for 100 percent renewable electricity.
GHG-4 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant shall provide documentation to the City demonstrating that the project buildings’ electrical room is sufficiently sized to hold additional panels that may be needed to supply power for future installation of electric charging systems for electric trucks and power transport refrigeration units (TRUs). Conduit shall be installed from the electrical room to tractor-trailer parking spaces in logical locations onsite to facilitate future electric truck charging. Conduit shall be installed between the electrical room and the loading docks to facilitate the use of electric plug-in TRUs.
GHG-7 Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, a new tenant/business entity shall place legible, durable, weather-proof signs at truck access gates, loading docks, and truck parking areas that identify applicable California Air Resources Board (CARB) anti-idling regulations. At a minimum, each sign shall include:
1) instructions for truck drivers to shut off engines when not in use; 2) instructions for drivers of diesel trucks to restrict idling to no more than five minutes once the vehicle is stopped, the transmission is set to "neutral" or "park," and the parking brake is engaged; and 3) telephone numbers of the building facilities manager and CARB to report violations. The City shall conduct a site inspection to ensure that the signs are in place.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 25 -
T-1 The applicant shall coordinate with Foothill Transit and the City of Irwindale to install a bus stop at Live Oak Avenue and Live Oak Lane for the Foothill Transit Line 492. The design and installation of the bus stop shall be coordinated with Foothill Transit and shall be paid for by the project applicant. The bus stop shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first development project on the project site.
T-2 The applicant shall modify the public sidewalk and landscaping along the north side of the portion of Live Oak Avenue that abuts the project site to include accommodation of a Class IV trail consistent with the City of Irwindale Active Transportation Plan to create a portion of the connection to the San Gabriel River Trail. Prior to the issuance of grading plans, the applicant shall submit the required improvement plans for the Class IV trail to the City of Irwindale’s Public Works Department for review and approval.
Finding:
Finding 3 – The City hereby makes Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure(s) above. The City of Irwindale hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure(s) is feasible, and the measure(s) is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less-than-significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment and residential opportunities, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the EIR(Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the proposed project outweigh its significant effects on the environment.
Impact 5.2-2: Construction and operation associated with the proposed project under Option 1 and Option 2 would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants that exceed South Coast AQMD’s threshold criteria. [Threshold AQ-2]
Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, and in particular, starting on page 5.2-28 of the Draft EIR.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 26 -
Construction
Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources, such as onsite heavy-duty construction vehicles, vehicles hauling materials to and from the site, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Construction of the proposed project would generate criteria air pollutants associated with construction equipment exhaust and fugitive dust from site preparation, rough grading, fine grading, utilities trenching, building construction, paving, architectural coating, and finishing and landscaping; off-site improvements; and sewer and storm drain construction. Option 2 would also include installation of the BESS facility on-site. Air pollutant emissions from construction activities on-site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. An estimate of maximum daily construction emissions for Option 1 and Option 2 of the proposed project are provided in Table 5.2-9, Maximum Daily Regional Construction Emissions (Option 1), and Table 5.2-10, Maximum Daily Regional Construction Emissions (Option 2), in the Draft EIR. The tables show the highest daily emissions that would be generated by the overlapping construction activities over the anticipated development period.
Option 1
As shown in Tables 5.2-9, the maximum daily emissions for NOx, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5 from construction-related activities would be less than their respective South Coast AQMD regional significance threshold values for Option 1. However, VOC emissions from construction activities overlapping with the proposed project’s architectural coating phase would exceed the South Coast AQMD Regional construction threshold for Option 1. 1 Therefore, short-term air quality impacts from proposed project-related construction activities would exceed South Coast AQMD’s threshold criteria for VOC, and impacts for Option 1 would be potentially significant.
Option 2
As shown in Tables 5.2-10, the maximum daily emissions for NOx, VOC, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5 from construction-related activities would all be less than their respective South Coast AQMD regional significance threshold values for Option 2. Therefore, short-term air quality impacts from proposed project-related construction activities under Option 2 would be less than significant.
Operation
As shown in Table 5.3-11, Maximum Daily Regional Operation Emissions (Option 1), and Table 5.3-12, Maximum Daily Regional Operation Emissions (Option 2), in the Draft EIR, project-related air pollutant emissions from daily operations would exceed the South Coast AQMD regional emissions thresholds for VOC and NOx under Option 1 and NOx under Option 2. The primary sources of long-term criteria air pollutant emissions would be project-generated passenger vehicle and truck trips as well as use of off-road equipment 1 The maximum daily construction VOC emissions for Option 2 is estimated to be 74.69 lb/day, which is less than the South Coast AQMD threshold for VOC.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 27 -
on-site such as yard trucks and forklifts. Option 2 would also include operation of the BESS on-site. However, it would not require natural gas use to operate and thus would not generate criteria air pollutant emissions. Emissions of VOC and NOx that exceed the South Coast AQMD regional threshold would cumulatively contribute to the O3 nonattainment designation of the SoCAB. Emissions of NOx that exceed the South Coast AQMD regional significance thresholds would also cumulatively contribute to the particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Therefore, the project would result in a potentially significant impact because it would significantly contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB.
Mitigation Measure:
The following feasible mitigation measure is required to be implemented:
AQ-1 The construction contractor shall specify in the construction bid that the construction contractor(s) shall only use interior and exterior paints with a low VOC (volatile organic compound) content with a maximum concentration of 0 grams per liter (g/L) for building architectural coating during construction and for future coating to reduce VOC emissions. All building and site plans shall note use of paints with a maximum VOC concentration of 0 g/L. Prior to construction, the construction contractor(s) shall ensure that all construction plans submitted to the City of Irwindale Building and Safety Department and the Community Development Department clearly show this requirement.
Finding:
Finding 3 – The City hereby makes Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure(s) above. The City of Irwindale hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure(s) is feasible, and the measure(s) is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less-than-significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment and residential opportunities, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the EIR (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the proposed project outweigh its significant effects on the environment.
Irwindale Gateway Specific Plan Project
CEQA Findings of Fact and
Statement of Overriding Considerations - 28 -
2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Impact 5.6-1: The proposed project would generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. [Threshold GHG-1]
Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.6, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and in particular, starting on page 5.6-20 of the Draft EIR.
Operation of development accommodated by under Option 1 would generate up to 2,058 trips per day (non-passenger equivalent) consisting of 1,508 passenger vehicle trips and 550 heavy-heavy duty truck trips. Proposed project development under Option 2 would involve construction and operation of a BESS facility and 704,070 square feet of industrial space. Under Option 2, the proposed project would generate up to 418 truck trips and 1,093 passenger trips for a total of 1,511 trips per day. In addition, operation of the BESS under Option 2 would consume electricity to power its components and to charge its batteries, which would generate GHG emissions. However, as the BESS facility would store excess electricity from the grid for use at a later time, it would lower the need for electricity generated from nonrenewable sources, thereby resulting in a reduction in GHG generation from such sources. Furthermore, the BESS, along with the installation of other battery energy storage facilities, would contribute to CARB’s goal for reaching 100 percent renewable energy production, thereby reducing GHG emissions from energy production.
The amount of energy derived from nonrenewable sources available on the electric grid that is used to charge the project’s batteries is “too speculative for evaluation” (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15145). The same is true for any attempt to evaluate the amount of GHG emissions caused by the project’s charging from nonrenewable sources available on the electric grid. Thus, any attempt to quantify indirect GHG emissions from the project would be too speculative to be of real value and thus is not required by CEQA.
Annual average construction emissions were amortized over 30 years and included in the emissions inventory to account for one-time GHG emissions from the construction phase of development accommodated by the proposed project. The proposed construction- and operation-related emissions of development accommodated by the proposed project are quantified and shown in Table 5.6-5, Project-Related GHG Emissions (Option 1), and Table 5.6-6, Project-Related GHG Emissions (Option 2), in the Draft EIR. As demonstrated in the tables, development and operation associated with the proposed project’s annual emissions would exceed the South Coast AQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year. Therefore, GHG emissions generated by the project would be considered to cumulatively contribute to statewide GHG emissions, and impacts are potentially significant.
Mitigation Measures
The following feasible mitigation measures are required to be implemented: