Agenda packet — Jackson City Council, March 23, 2026

Jackson City Council Agenda
Monday, March 23, 2026 – 6:30 PM Regular Meeting
Jackson City Hall, 33 Broadway, Jackson, California 95642 Public Teleconference Line: 1-650-419-1505
Meeting ID: 768053080
Please join using this link with PC, MAC, LINUX, iOS or Android:
https://v.ringcentral.com/join/768053080
One tap to join audio only from a smartphone: +16504191505 NOTE: The City Council meeting will be held in person at the address listed above. The City may also provide a courtesy option for the public to observe the meeting remotely using the teleconference line or RingCentral internet-based service option listed above. Callers will be muted upon entry and live remote public comment will not be taken unless required by Government Code section 54953, et. seq. If remote public comment is required, the Mayor will make announcement, and RingCentral participants may request to speak by selecting the “Raise Hand” icon, and telephone-only participants should wait until the Mayor opens public comment and then state their name for the record when prompted.

1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA.

Approval of agenda for this date; any and all off-agenda items must be approved by the City Council (pursuant to §54954.2 of the Government Code).

2. PUBLIC MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA.

Discussion items only, no action will be taken. Any person may address the Council at this time on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council. Please note – there is a three (3) minute limit.

3. CONSENT CALENDAR.

4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS.

This section is to provide staff an opportunity to present oral status reports on issues. No legal action is expected to be taken by the Council.

5. COUNCIL REPORTS.

This section is to provide Council members an opportunity to present reports on their activities and to request items be placed on future agendas.

Pg. 3
Pg. 9
Pg. 11
Pg. 12
Pg. 37

Page 1 of 67 ends

Jackson City Council Agenda Monday, March 23, 2026

6. DISCUSSION CALENDAR.
a. Receive, discuss, and provide direction regarding (verbal) report from the Homeless Outreach Coordinator regarding the City’s response to homeless issues [Christine Platt]. b. City of Jackson Public Pool 2026 Swim Program presentation [Pool Director Daphne Parker]. c. Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-08 Establishing the fee and program schedule for 2026 Swim Program.
d. Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-09 Accepting the Annual ATMF Report for ACTC.

7. REGULAR MEETING ADJOURNMENT.

Regular meeting adjournment.

UPCOMING MEETINGS:

March 24, 2026 6:30 pm Water Rate Study Workshop
March 25, 2026 1:30 pm Economic Development Committee Meeting April 8, 2026 10:00 am Cemetery Committee Meeting
April 8, 2026 1:00 pm Special Economic Development Committee Meeting April 13, 2026 6:30 pm City Council Meeting
April 20, 2026 6:30 pm Planning Commission Meeting (TBD) April 27, 2026 6:30 pm City Council Meeting
UPCOMING CLOSURE DATE FOR CITY OFFICE:

March 31, 2026 Cesar Chavez Day
Posted: March 20, 2026 City Hall, 33 Broadway, Jackson
Agenda materials will be available for review (pursuant to §54957.5 Government Code Section) in the City Clerk’s office in City Hall.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, you should contact the Office of the City Clerk at (209) 223-1646 (voice) or (209) 223-3141 (fax). Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

Visit our website at http://ci.jackson.ca.us for copies of previous agendas, minutes, and City budget.

Pg. 47
Pg. 53

Page 2 of 67 ends

CITY OF JACKSON
City Council Meeting Draft Minutes
March 9, 2026
Mayor and Council Members
Chad Simmons, Mayor
Steve McLean, Vice Mayor
Max Godde, Council Member
Connie Gonsalves, Council Member
Sierra McLean, Council Member
ABSENT: None
John Georgette, City Clerk
Josh Nelson, City Attorney (attended remotely)
Staff Members:

Carl P. Simpson, City Manager
Chris Mynderup, Police Chief
Ryan Pidgeon, Fire Chief
Trevor Hoaas, Assistant PW Superintendent
Dana Knight, Administrative Assistant
Mayor Simmons called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.

1. CERMONIAL.
• Introduction and swearing in of new Firefighter: Joseph Mondani Chief Pidgeon introduced Joseph Mondani as a new probationary firefighter, highlighting his strong academic background, including a 4.0 degree in criminal justice and homeland security, as well as his EMT certification and Firefighter I training. His international experience, community involvement, and commitment to service were emphasized as key strengths he brings to the Jackson Fire Department. Firefighter Mondani was officially sworn in by City Clerk Georgette. • Proclamation - Commemorating March 2026 as American Red Cross Month.

Terry Pendley accepted the proclamation on behalf of the American Red Cross.

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA.

Motion to Approve the City Council Agenda dated March 9, 2026, as presented. Moved by Councilmember Gonsalves, seconded by Vice Mayor McLean, and carried by a 5 to 0 vote:

AYES: Simmons, Steve McLean, Godde, Gonsalves, Sierra McLean NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

3. PUBLIC MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA.

David Drummond reported ongoing road deterioration on McGee Street, noting that the pavement in front of their home is crumbling and that they have personally spent about $200 on temporary asphalt patches that only lasted eight to ten months. They described additional issues including a large pothole across the street measuring several inches deep and several feet in size, a sinking of road near their driveway, and multiple smaller potholes at the top of the hill. David stated they have raised these concerns multiple times and are seeking an update on when repairs will be addressed.

Page 3 of 67 ends

March 9, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes__

4. CONSENT CALENDAR.

Items listed on the consent calendar are considered routine and may be enacted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. a. Approval of February 23, 2026 Meeting Minutes.
b. Approval of Expenditure Report in the amount of $391,246.61 c. Approval of February 2026 Payroll Expenditure Report in the amount of $499,445.28. d. Receive Building Department Monthly Report for February 2026. e. Receive Fire Department Monthly Report for February 2026. f. Receive Police Department Monthly Report for February 2026. g. Approval of recommended range increase and title change for Accounting Manager Position. h. Approval of the 2026 City of Jackson Public Pool Lifeguard Certification/Recertification Program.
i. Resolution No. 2026-06 accepting the City Manager as the authorized signatory on documents and agreements related to a SRF Construction grant for the Martell Reservoir Replacement Project.

Motion to Approve the Consent Calendar dated March 9, 2026 as presented. Moved by Councilmember Godde, seconded by Councilmember McLean, and carried by a 4 to 0 vote:

AYES: Simmons, Steve McLean, Godde, Sierra McLean
NOES: None
ABSENT: Gonsalves
ABSTAIN: None

5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS.

This section is to provide staff an opportunity to present oral status reports on issues. No legal action is expected to be taken by the Council.

Assistant Public Works Superintendent, Trevor Hoaas - Reported that a new sewer truck has been purchased, fully equipped, and is performing well in hotspot maintenance and emergency response.

Paving on Buena Vista is set to begin tomorrow and is expected to be completed within one to two days.

The Stark Lane Bridge replacement is scheduled for June and July and will be going out to bid soon, along with new Civic Center AC units and two sewer projects on Bright Avenue and Anita Street, which are also expected to go out to bid shortly. Also shared that new drinking fountains with bottle fill ups for the Civic Center, the corp yard and the fire department have been purchased.

Fire Chief, Ryan Pidgeon – Thanked the Jackson Hook and Ladder Association for the purchase of two new iPads, which will be used for the Tablet Command Program, and said they are now fully implemented with Tablet Command across all apparatuses. Shared the news that one of the injured firefighters will be returning to full duty next week. Chief Pidgeon invited everyone to stop by the fire station for a tri-tip sandwich during Dandelion Days.

Police Chief, Chris Mynderup – No report.

City Attorney, Josh Nelson – No report.

City Manager, Carl P. Simpson – No report.

Page 4 of 67 ends

March 9, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes__

6. COUNCIL REPORTS.

This section is to provide Council members an opportunity to present reports on their activities and to request items be placed on future agendas.

Councilmember Gonsalves – There is a Special Economic Development Committee meeting this Wednesday regarding planning for the first annual July 3rd parade on Main Street in coordination with the Jackson Lions fireworks show. Jackson merchants have shown strong support, with plans for a sidewalk sale following the parade, and restaurants will set up tents to serve food. The city is also working on purchasing portable picnic tables with umbrellas to place along Main Street. Coordination efforts are ongoing, and after discussions with the American Legion it was agreed they will partner with the city to help organize the event.

Councilmember Godde – Attended a homeless task force meeting on the 26th. He volunteered at the Kennedy Mine for Amador Day that they have every year, and said there was a big turnout. And he thanked Public Works, Bree and Trevor and Ben for helping him place four more grave markers for our unknown in the cemetery.

Councilmember Sierra McLean – No report.

Vice Mayor McLean – Have been busy going to the state capital to work on an assembly bill for the Native Sons. He attended a ribbon cutting at Laughton's Deli the other day, and a fun Historic Jackson Business Association mixer. Will be on a fun vacation in the Gulf of America until the end of the month.

Mayor Simmons – Reported attending several community events, including a ribbon cutting at C&C Ranch for the Mudlow Land Trust’s new school farm project, which will support local school food services. He also attended an Economic Development Committee meeting, the Blue and Gold Boy Scouts dinner, and an HJBA meeting at Saloon 1848. Said the new speakeasy-style space is expected to open soon.

Additionally, Mayor Simmons commented that there was strong community engagement at a Chamber of Commerce event, and the Jackson Lions crab feed. Reminded everyone of an upcoming Mixer on Main event scheduled for Wednesday at Lucas downtown in partnership with Jackson Realty.

7. DISCUSSION CALENDAR.
a. Presentation from the Environmental Protection Agency on the Argonaut Mine Superfund Site removal of residential contaminated soil plan for 2026. [Sania Kamran, Remedial Project Manager]
The EPA provided an overview of the Argonaut Mine Superfund site and its upcoming cleanup efforts.

The historic gold mine contaminated soil around Jackson with arsenic, lead, and mercury, and the site has been part of the Superfund program since 2015. Past cleanup actions removed soil from heavily contaminated areas, and the agency is now focusing on residential yards identified through 2024 sampling. Access agreements have been obtained, and contractors will survey properties, develop cleanup plans with homeowner approval, and restore each property, with work expected to take about two weeks per yard. Cleanup is planned for summer and fall 2026, with any remaining properties addressed in 2027, targeting neighborhoods including Westview Drive, Argonaut Lane, Buena Vista Drive, Spun Road, Stark Lane, and portions of Argonaut High School. EPA also addressed health and safety concerns, emphasizing dust control, air quality monitoring, property restoration, coordination with residents, and safe management of traffic and property access. Homeowners will incur no cost, and all utilities or damaged property will be restored by contractors.

Page 5 of 67 ends

March 9, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes__
Michael Montoya with SKEO Solutions, and a federal contractor with EPA, facilitated questions from the public for the EPA to answer.

Melissa Martin representing Jackson Apartments asked if they will be notifying our residents or will she need to notify the residents of the cleanup?
Sonia asked Melissa to provide contact information to her, so she could notify the residents.

Lisa Lucke asked whether property restoration begins individually after each house is cleaned or waits until all houses in the neighborhood are completed and sought clarification on what restoration entails.

EPA response: The planning phase with contractors is still ongoing and no definitive answer is available yet. It will likely be proceeding on a property-by-property basis.

Resident question about how soon the contractors be in touch with the residences? EPA response: Site surveys and property assessments, including photos and planning for restoration, are expected to begin within the next month once planning documents are finalized.

Tom Consolo raised concerns about traffic impacts from the cleanup near Argonaut High School, noting limited access routes and potential congestion on Hoffman and Argonaut Lane, especially during school pickup and drop-off. He asked whether the Amador County School District has been advised on coordinating traffic management to mitigate disruptions for students, parents, and local residents.

EPA response: The traffic control plan is still being developed, and it will be sent to Bree Wilder, the Director of Public Works, for his review. If he has any concerns about that, we are willing to speak with folks from the school district about traffic issues or any anticipated challenges.

Vice Mayor McLean noted that his house is adjacent to the construction area and observed that dump trucks varied their exit routes, using multiple nearby roads rather than a single path.

EPA response: The current project will involve significantly less movement than the previous tailings removal, likely resulting in reduced truck traffic on the roads.

Marilyn Lewis provided a historical overview of the property, noting that in the 1980s a company had removed and paid for the topsoil, and that EPA had returned later, though little contamination remained.

She questioned why EPA was conducting cleanup again, expressing concern over repeated interventions and associated costs.

EPA response: The site is designated as highly contaminated, and current assessments focus on residential areas and schools. New sampling has identified areas with elevated lead, mercury, or arsenic, requiring targeted cleanup. Past excavations may not have fully surveyed affected areas, and residual dust and runoff from rainfall can spread contaminants to neighboring properties, even after topsoil removal. Records from previous cleanups are publicly available for review. It was emphasized that EPA’s priority is protecting human health and the environment, and that the federal government, not the city, funds the cleanup since the mine is inactive and there is no responsible party.

Marilyn remained concerned about ongoing disruption and questioned when the cleanup would ever conclude. EPA response: The investigation is ongoing and may take several years to fully assess all impacted areas.

A resident requested clarification on the site-specific cleanup goals for the current project, specifically asking which homes would be cleaned up and which would not.

EPA response: The initial sampling conducted between 2022 and 2024 prioritized homes with arsenic levels above 100 milligrams per kilogram, which was the previous cleanup threshold.

Based on new scientific research, the EPA has updated the residential cleanup goal to 5.5 milligrams per kilogram to better protect human health.

Terry noted that funding documents reference a 100 milligram per kilogram cleanup level, with

Page 6 of 67 ends

March 9, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes__
roughly 40 homes slated for cleanup, and questioned the public record for verification of the new

5.5 level. The EPA clarified that while earlier documentation cited 100, a recent amendment signed by the division director now establishes 5.5 milligrams per kilogram as the cleanup goal for residential properties. Terry observed that none of the tested homes currently meet the 5.5 level and asked about the feasibility of achieving this goal across the site. The EPA responded that the team is still prioritizing homes above 100 milligrams per kilogram and will assess the full data to determine the extent of cleanup needed, noting that notifications to residents regarding the 5.5 threshold will occur once this evaluation is complete.

Terry Penley, a resident of Jackson and owner of a home on Mariposa, noted that her property, where her daughter also lives and operates a daycare, had never been tested until the most recent EPA cleanup round. Located near the mine and adjacent to the firehouse, Penley expressed support for EPA testing at her property. She stated that higher levels of lead were detected in her daughter’s yard, which is now scheduled for soil removal, and confirmed that she is comfortable with the planned cleanup.

Councilmember Sierra McLean, who lives in the Westview subdivision, asked about soil testing for the untested areas of the neighborhood, including Arroyo and Hillside, noting that only the front half of Westview had been tested and that their own property had not been evaluated.

EPA response: The investigation is ongoing and that additional testing will be conducted as required, indicating that it is likely those untested parcels, including the resident’s home, will be assessed in the future.

Councilmember Gonsalves raised concerns regarding a commercial-zoned parcel previously tested and signed off by the EPA, noting that the property had been listed for sale but that subsequent changes to EPA standards prompted retesting.

EPA response: The change in standards applies to residential use and that the property in question had not been tested in its entirety initially. The EPA clarified the difference between removal actions, which address urgent risks, and the ongoing Superfund remedial process, noting that completion of one step does not signify the end of the site cleanup. Then further explained that step-out sampling was initially used to test hotspots, but a comprehensive evaluation of the parcel was completed in December, and meetings with the property owner are planned to discuss next steps.

Councilmember Gonsalves expressed concern that changing standards after signing off on a property could create hardship and a perceived double standard. The EPA responded that the approach aims to protect current and future owners from Superfund liability and ensure safe redevelopment. The discussion also touched on capping requirements, maintenance to prevent exposure, and the long, ongoing nature of the Superfund process. The EPA acknowledged the frustration over changing standards and the duration of the process, noting that standard adjustments come from EPA headquarters and that the agency is committed to thorough evaluation and public safety.

A resident inquired about whether local contractors or workforce would be utilized for the cleanup project and if there would be local job opportunities.

EPA response: While a prime contracting firm oversees the project, the selection of subcontractors is at their discretion, though they typically prefer to hire locally.

The resident also asked about whether arsenic measurements included speciation. The EPA confirmed that a bioavailability study had been conducted, indicating that arsenic in the soil is approximately 20% bioavailable, and that this factor was incorporated into the project’s risk calculations.

Page 7 of 67 ends

March 9, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes__
The EPA will be having an open house in the Civic Center at 10:00 am tomorrow. They invited anyone who would like to come and have a more one-on-one conversation, and said everyone is welcome.

Discussion item only, no action taken.
b. Presentation from Hildebrand Consulting regarding the 2026 Preliminary Water Rate Study. [Mark Hildebrand]
Mark Hildebrand of Hildebrand Consulting presented preliminary findings of the City of Jackson’s water rate study, outlining Proposition 218 requirements, rate-setting methodology, and a 10-year financial plan. He proposed rate increases of approximately 9% annually for four years and 6% in the fifth year to address rising costs and fund capital projects, including a planned $8 million reservoir.

He emphasized maintaining reserves, noted a temporary drawdown with recovery, and discussed shifting slightly toward higher fixed charges for financial stability. He also introduced a drought surcharge policy for temporary rate adjustments and outlined new AB 2257 procedures for ratepayer objections.

Council members asked clarifying questions regarding project costs, debt assumptions, and rate structure.

Tom Consolo expressed concerns about the selection of comparison cities in the rate survey, the financial impact of proposed increases, and the need for a clear sunset provision for any drought surcharge to ensure it is lifted when conditions improve.

Marilyn Lewis provided historical context regarding the City of Jackson’s water service area, referencing legal victories in 1992 that established the city’s service boundaries. She noted that past bond measures, funded by local residents, were intended to be repaid through revenues generated within that service area. Lewis expressed concern that the water agency is currently benefiting from that revenue despite prior agreements, and suggested the city retains legal standing to revisit the issue and potentially recover funds.

Mark stated that the first stakeholder workshop will be held on March 24th. It is an opportunity to talk to the community to address any concerns and explain the thinking behind the financial plan and the numbers to be as transparent as possible.

Discussion item only, no action taken.

8. REGULAR MEETING ADJOURNMENT.

Mayor Simmons adjourned the regular meeting at 8:08 p.m.

ATTEST:
__________________________________ __________________________________ John Georgette, City Clerk Date Approved

Page 8 of 67 ends

REPORT.: Mar 20 26 Friday CITY of JACKSON
RUN .... : Mar 20 26 Time: 11:51
Run By.: Laurie Fishback
Cash Disbursement Detail Report
PAGE: 001
ID#: PY-DP
CTL.: JAC
Check
Number
ACH50
ACH51
ACH52
ACH53
ACH54
019705
019706
019707
019708
019709
019710
019711
019712
019713
019714
019715
019716
019717
019718
019719
019720
019721
019722
019723
019724
019725
019726
019727
019728
019729
019730
019731
019732
0197 33
019734
019735
019736
Check Listing for 03-26 thru 03-26 Bank Account.: 1000
Check
Date
Vendor
Number Name
03/20/26
03/20/26
03/20/26
03/20/26
03/20/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
03/23/26
MEEOl
MEEOl
VOLOl
VOLOl
VOLOl
AMA26
AMA33
AMA70
AMA90
ATTOl
ATT02
ATT08
ATTlO
BEN02
BER05
BES04
03/23/26 BIG03
03/23/26 DAV03
03/23/26 FOL02
03/23/26 GE003
03/23/26 GRA06
03/23/26 HBAOl
03/23/26 HEFOO
03/23/26 HIL02
03/23/26 HRDOO
03/23/26 HUN02
03/23/26 IND04
03/23/26 JAC09
03/23/26 LMAOl
03/23/26 PACOl
03/23/26 PAC04
03/23/26 PLA06
03/23/26 PLA07
03/23/26 REPOl
03/23/26 SHROl
03/23/26 SKEOl
03/23/26 SMAOl
--------------

MEEKS LUMBER & HARDWARE

MEEKS LUMBER & HARDWARE
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.

VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.

AMADOR WATER AGENCY
AMADOR CO. ANIMAL CONTROL
AMADOR STEEL, LLC.

AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES

AT&T MOBILITY/CINGULAR

AT&T MOBILITY
AT&T

ATT CALNET

BENNETT ENGINEERING SERVI

JUSTIN BERENSTEIN

BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP
Check Total .......... :

BIG BRAND TIRE & SERVICE
DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC.

FOLSOM CHEVROLET
GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.

Check Total .......... :

GRAINGER

HAUGE BRUECK ASSOCIATES,

HEFFINGTON, GARRETT

HILDEBRAND CONSULTING, LL

HRDIRECT

HUNT & SONS LLC

INDUSTRIAL INSPECION & AN

JACKSON CLEANERS
Check Total .......... :

L & M AUTOMOTIVE
Check Total .......... :

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC

PACE SUPPLY CORP

CHRISTINE PLATT
Check Total .......... :

PLACER LABS, INC.

REPUBLIC SERVICES

SHRED-IT USA

SKEO SOLUTIONS

JOSHUA SMART
Net
Amount

44.39 14.94

99.95 69,95
159.90
144577.27
4310.70
128.43
8018.11
1325,76
117.94
265.37
1266.37
10573.14
5000.00
5868.30
1811. 00
2943.80
10623.10
Invoice #
1103 67 4 OH
11036876H
03012026H
03-01-26H
MAR 01 26H
2/12-3/11
2/01-2/28
8158
MARCH 15
03102026
03052026
033126
03/06/26
26035570

FACADE GR
1055715
1055716
1055717
241.45 8604810
3705.74 CA60393
675.00 191177
17513.75 226020355
2968.75 226020356
20482.50
459.88
1696.00
510. 71
4392.75
213. 24
4244.58
1400.00

94.50 351.00

12.00 457.50
1332.70
665.66
1998.36
97 7 97 0216
2062
73866
13149178
18725011
13430
INDI11068
3473
3489
D262684
31373
31399
21279.83 031326

31.19 061120050

30. 94 02282026

13.95 03022026

44.89 9000.00 INUS08250
2393.33 000214676
265.32 D60219
100.00 C60319
100.00 C60319
Description

CEMENT FOR CEMTERY PLOT
2X4 12' / TRAINING PROP

BROADBAND FOR CIVIC CENTER

BROADBAND FOR JPD

BROADBAND FOR PW, WWTP, JWW AND SCOUT HUT
Water Purch FEB. 12, 2026 TO MAR. 11,2026
ANIMAL INTAKE FOR FEBRUARY 2026

ANGLE IRON FOR SEWER TRUCK
AMAZON PURCHASES 02/16/26 TO 03/15/26

AT&T FIRST NET
Communications

AT&T INTERNET

AT&T CALNET
FEB 26' MARTELL RES REPLACEMENT PROJECT PLANNING
FACADE GRANT REIMBURSEMENT 105 MAIN STREET

LEGAL SERVICES / GENERAL

PERSONNEL

HOMEKEY
TIRE SENSOR FOR J54

REPLACEMENT OF SLIDE AT DETERT PARK
REPAIRING OF WIRES ON J60 / FOCS210201

ORO DE AMADOR STABILITY ANALYSIS

ORO DE AMADOR TAILINGS DELINEATION

FLOAT SWITCH FOR LIFT STATION
PROGRESS REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2026

PRINTER INK AND OFFICE CHAIR
800 GALLONS OF THIOGUARD

LABOR LAW POSTERS
FUEL CARDS FOR 03/01/2026 TO 03/15/2026

ANNUAL BUCKET TRUCK INSPECTION

UNIFORM CLEANING
DRY CLEANING FOR FEBRUARY 2026

BIO HAZARD CLEANING
ENGINE OIL, IGNITION SWITCH, LOCK-SMITH FOR J54
SPARK PLUG, IGNITION COIL FOR J61

PG&E BILLING
(12) SS 3/4 INSERT FITTINGS

UBER FROM AIRPORT TO TRAINING

UBER TO TRAINING
LOCATION BASED SERVICES 02/13/2026 - 02/12/2027

ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP
PAPER SHREDDING FEB 2026

CIVIC CENTER DEPOSIT REFUND

Page 9 of 67 ends

REPORT. Mar 20 26 Friday CITY of JACKSON PAGE: 002
ID#: PY-DP
CTL.: JAC
RUN .... Mar 20 26 Time: 11:51
Run By. Laurie Fishback
Cash Disbursement Detail Report
Check Listing for 03-26 thru 03-26 Bank Account.: 1000
Check
Number
019737
019738
019739
0197 4 0
0197 41
019742
019743
Check
Date
Vendor
Number Name
Net
Amount Invoice # Description
03/23/26 THE07
03/23/26 TRA07
03/23/26 USMOl
03/23/26 VAN03
03/23/26 WEBOl
03/23/26 WELOl
03/23/26 WIT02
---------------- --------- ------------ -------------------------------------

THE MOUNTAIN MERCHANT

TRACTOR SUPPLY CREDIT PLA

US MINE CORPORATION

VAN NESS ROOFING

WEBER, GHIO & ASSOC
Check Total .......... :

WELLS FARGO

WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROU
Check Total .......... :

Cash Account Total ...... :

Total Disbursements ..... :
369.38

26.92 19.62
332.83
4 72. 40
225.00
150.00
4040.75
1516.50
3572.48
2656.85
8648.00
163.50
250.00
729. Bl
5234.50
657,75
9195.44
796. 58
3954.27
880.43

41. 93
43186.19
5919.04
2823.02
327.56
3150.58
313292.15
313292.15
20003
287157
341845
10448
16016
16017
16018
16019
16020
16021
16022
16023
16024
16025
16026
16027
16028
16029
16030
16031
16033
16032
3/3/2026
849203
852931

PRINTING OF WALKING TOUR GUIDES

HYDROLIC FLUID

UTILITY SAND
REFUND OF PERMIT #10448 / 10608 ARGONAUT LN.

GENERAL CITY ENGINEERING
WITHROW LLA 154 GOLF COURSE RD

WAKLEE - CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
HSIP HWY 49 STREET LIGHT PROJECT

BUILDING DEPT SERVICES

BUENA VISTA WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

STARK LANE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

STARK LANE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT / BIO ASSEM

HOFFMAN PATCH PAVING PROJECT

SLURRY SEAL PROJECT - MAIN STREET

TRAFFIC STUDY - MAIN ST
2026 SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

CITY HALL HVAC UPGRADE
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING - SOUTH AVE. BRIDGE

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL PITT ST B
ENVIRONMENTAL - PITT ST. BRIDGE

RIGH OF WAY SUPPORT - PITT STREET BRIDGE

RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY SUPPORT - PITT STREET BRIDGE

WELLS FARGO ROVOLVING CREDIT CARD

PPE / HELMETS AND GLOVES
(2-PAIR) STRUCTURE GLOVES

Page 10 of 67 ends

Monthly Homeless Outreach Report 3-23
The estimated number of unsheltered individuals in the community remains approximately the same as reported last month. Outreach continues regularly to known locations to maintain contact, provide resources, and assess needs.

This month, one local veteran was successfully connected to permanent housing through collaboration between the HUD-VASH case manager and Insight Housing case managers.

Continued coordination between outreach workers, housing programs, and veteran services remains an important pathway to housing placements.

Shelter Update
I would like to thank the City and the Red Cross for their work in providing the emergency shelter option for members of the community who need immediate protection from the elements.

During my previous report, I referenced a 35-day employment and housing requirement for shelter guests. I would like to clarify that this specific timeframe was not accurate. However, the remaining information regarding updated shelter guidelines and expectations for residents remains correct.

Outreach efforts continue to focus on:
• Maintaining contact with unsheltered individuals
• Connecting people with available services and case management • Coordinating with regional housing providers
• Encouraging participation in shelter and housing programs when available The primary challenge continues to be the limited availability of affordable and supportive housing options, which slows the transition from outreach and temporary shelter into permanent housing.

As the community continues discussing long-term strategies, it may also be helpful to explore managed or sanctioned spaces where unsheltered individuals can stay safely while working toward services and housing, as this approach has been used by some rural communities to reduce unmanaged camping.

Outreach will continue focusing on building trust, connecting individuals with services, and working with partner agencies to identify housing opportunities as they become available.

Page 11 of 67 ends

CITY OF JACKSON

MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Erin Ventura, Contract Planner
DATE: March 23, 2026
SUBJECT: 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report

RECOMMENDATION
Review the 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR), provide comments, and direct staff to submit the report to HCD.

BACKGROUND
Local jurisdictions are required to submit a Housing Element Annual Report (APR) to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April 1 of each year. The report provides information to the State, and the public, on the implementation of the Housing Element and progress toward our Regional Housing Needs Allocation numbers.

APRs must be presented to the local legislative body for its review and acceptance, usually as a consent or discussion item on a regular meeting agenda. The APR was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their March 16, 2026 meeting. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council accept the report.

DISCUSSION
Staff prepared the Jackson Housing Element APR for the year 2025. The 6th Cycle Housing Element was adopted at the end of 2023 and certified by the State in early 2025.

Over the past year, progress has been made on several programs outlined in the Housing Element (see Table D). Below is a summary of key programs that staff worked on in 2025:
• Program 1: Countywide Housing Working Group (CWHWG)
o The CWHWG met consistently throughout the year.
• Program 9: Affordable and Special Needs Housing Assistance and Incentives
o The City supported Victory Village in their HomeKey grant application.

As staff availability and budget allow, additional programs will be implemented throughout the Housing Cycle. The main focus for 2026 will be to provide more resources and information to residents regarding ADUs and Junior ADUs (JADUs).

Page 12 of 67 ends

In 2025 the City permitted or entitled 4 units (Table A2). The City is not on track to meet its RHNA for below market rate housing at this time. There are 4 years left in the Housing Cycle and adequate time to build additional units as supported by the market.

Note that the 2024 data did not transfer correctly into the 2025 APR, therefore the 5 completed units from last year have not been added to Table B. Above Moderate should be 47, with 17 remaining.

Page 13 of 67 ends

Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title Click here to download APR Instructions
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
v_02_19_26
Please Start Here
General Information
2025
Jackson
Contact Information
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You
will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import
from. Project and program data will be copied exactly
how it was entered in last year's form and must be
updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable
activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d.

Click here to add rows to a table. If you add too many
rows, you may select a cell in the row you wish to
remove and type ctrl + d.
33 Broadway
Jackson
95642
Erin
Ventura
Contract Planner
[email protected]
2092231646
Mailing Address
Annual Progress Report January 2020

Page 14 of 67 ends

Jurisdiction Jackson
Reporting Year 2025
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle
Current Year
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 4
0 4
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 0 0 0
2 to 4 units per structure 3 4 1
5+ units per structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling Unit 0 0 0
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 3 4 1
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units 1 3
1 1
1 3
0 0
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Acutely Low 0 0 0
Extremely Low 0 0 0
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 0 0
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 0 0
AB 2011 (2022) 0 0
SB 6 (2022) 0 0
SMAP 0 0
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications # of Units
Ministerial 1 3
Discretionary 0 0
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0
Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezoned Count 1 0
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process or SMAP (formerly SB 35 / 423) - Applications Number of SMAP Applications
Above Moderate
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
09/15/2021 - 09/15/2029
Units Constructed - SMAP (formerly SB 35 / 423) - Permits Number of SMAP Applications Approved
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Acutely Low
Extremely Low

Page 15 of 67 ends

Jurisdiction Jackson ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation
Planning
Period 6th Cycle 09/15/2021 - 09/15/2029
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Historic Sites
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
(see
instructions)
Acutely LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Acutely LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Extremely Low
Income Deed
Restricted
Extremely Low
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total

PROPOSED
Units by
Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by
project
Total

DISAPPROVE
D Units by
Project
Please select
state
streamlining
provision/s the
application was
submitted
pursuant to.

Is this project
located on a site
with an
associated
historical
designation as
outlined in
Government
Code Section
65400(a)(2)(N)
and reported on
Table L?
Did the
housing
development
application
seek incentives
or concessions
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915?
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 020-242-002 35 Court Street 58 2 to 4 R 5/1/2025 3 3 NONE Yes - Local No 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
5 1
Project Identifier Unit Types Density Bo
Applica
11 Housing Development Applications Submitted
Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes

Page 16 of 67 ends

Jurisdiction Jackson ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 09/15/2021 - 09/15/2029
1 Projection
Period 3 4
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level
Projection
Period -
12/31/2018-
09/14/2021
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Total Units to
Date (all
years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - 4 - - - -
Above Moderate 64 28 - 12 2 - - - - - - 42 22
138
28 - 12 2 - 4 - - - - 46 92
Acutely Low
Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. - -
Total Units
*For jurisdictions that received RHNA determinations for the current cycle prior to the passage of AB 3093 (September 19, 2024):
- You were not allocated Acutely Low-Income and Extremely Low-Income RHNA targets, therefore the allocations in Field 1 are listed as "0" - If you wish to set your own targets in these income categories for informational purposes, contact HCD staff at [email protected]. - All Acutely Low-Income and Extremely Low-Income units reported during the cycle are counted towards Very-Low Income RHNA progress *For years prior to 2025, data on deed-restricted vs. non-deed restricted Extremely Low-Income units is approximated from whether the projects reported any deed-restricted Very Low-Income Units. If you wish to edit this historical data for accuracy or have any questions about the data, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. 20 Total RHNA
-
23 Extremely Low
Low
*For years prior to 2025, Acutely Low-Income units are reported within the Extremely Low-Income category Please Note: Table B does not currently contain data from Table F or Table F2 for prior years. You may login to the APR system to see Table B that contains this data. -
4 Moderate
27 23
24 -
-
Income Level
Very Low
- -
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs.

Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 2 Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
27

Page 17 of 67 ends

Table A2
Housing without
Financial Assistance or
Deed Restrictions
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
Notes
2 3 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Acutely LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Acutely LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
Assistance
Programs for Each
Development
(may select multiple
- see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable
without financial
assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how
the locality determined the
units were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
(years) (if affordable
in perpetuity enter
1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Destro
yed Units
Demolished
or Destroyed
Units
Demolished/
Destroyed
Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus
Applied to the Project
(Percentage Increase in
Total Allowable Units or
Total Maximum Allowable
Residential Gross Floor
Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions,
Waivers, or Other
Modifications Given
to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the
incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding
Parking Waivers
or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project
receive a reduction or
waiver of parking
standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 020-242-002 35 Court St 58 2 to 4 R based on size and rents 020-333-002 88 Fench Bar Rd 9857 2 to 4 R based on size and rents Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus 1 4
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement

Page 18 of 67 ends

Table A2
- New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Housing without
Financial Assistance or
Deed Restrictions
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
Notes
5 6 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Current APN Street Address Project Name+
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Entitlement
Date Approved
# of Units
issued
Entitlements
Acutely
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Acutely
LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Assistance
Programs for Each
Development
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable
without financial
assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how
the locality determined the
units were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
(years) (if affordable in
perpetuity enter
1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Destro
yed Units
Demolished
or Destroyed
Units
Demolished/
Destroyed
Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus
Applied to the Project
(Percentage Increase in
Total Allowable Units or
Total Maximum Allowable
Residential Gross Floor
Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions,
Waivers, or Other
Modifications Given
to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the
incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding
Parking Waivers
or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project
receive a reduction or
waiver of parking
standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
3 0 3 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0
020-242-002 35 Court St 3 11/7/2025 3 based on size and rents 020-333-002 88 Fench Bar Rd 0 based on size and rents
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus 7 Project Identifier Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits

Page 19 of 67 ends

Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Affordabilit
y by
Household
Incomes -
Certificates
of
Occupancy
Housing without
Financial Assistance or
Deed Restrictions
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
Notes
8 9 10 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Building
Permits Date
Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Acutely Low
Income
Deed
Restricted
Assistance
Programs for Each
Development
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable
without financial
assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how
the locality determined
the units were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of
Affordability or Deed
Restriction (years) (if
affordable in
perpetuity enter
1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Destro
yed Units
Demolished
or Destroyed
Units
Demolished/
Destroyed
Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus
Applied to the Project
(Percentage Increase in
Total Allowable Units or
Total Maximum
Allowable Residential
Gross Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions,
Waivers, or Other
Modifications Given
to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the
incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding
Parking Waivers
or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project
receive a reduction
or waiver of parking
standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
0 0 0 0 4 0 4 #REF! 0
020-242-002 35 Court St 3 12/3/2025 3 based on size and rents 020-333-002 88 Fench Bar Rd 1 2/26/2025 1 based on size and rents 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus Project Identifier

Page 20 of 67 ends

Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Historic Sites
Housing without
Financial Assistance or
Deed Restrictions
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
Notes
11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Acutely
LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates
of Occupancy
or other
forms of
readiness
Please select
the state
streamlining
provision the
project was

APPROVED
pursuant to.
(may select
multiple)
Is this project
located on a site
with an
associated
historical
designation as
outlined in
Government
Code Section
65400(a)(2)(N)
and reported on
Table L?
Assistance
Programs for Each
Development
(may select multiple
- see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable
without financial
assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how
the locality determined the
units were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction
(years) (if affordable
in perpetuity enter
1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Destro
yed Units
Demolished
or Destroyed
Units
Demolished/
Destroyed
Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus
Applied to the Project
(Percentage Increase in
Total Allowable Units or
Total Maximum Allowable
Residential Gross Floor
Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions,
Waivers, or Other
Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the
incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding
Parking Waivers
or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project
receive a reduction
or waiver of parking
standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
020-242-002 35 Court St 0 NONE Yes - Local based on size and rents 020-333-002 88 Fench Bar Rd 1 12/22/2025 1 NONE Yes - Local based on size and rents 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units Density Bonus Project Identifier

Page 21 of 67 ends

Page 22 of 67 ends

Jurisdiction Jackson
Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program
Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes:

Count Supporting Documents
PROGRAM 1:

COUNTYWIDE HOUSING

WORKING GROUP
● Amador County, and the Cities of Amador City, Ione, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek to establish a Countywide Housing Working Group, including one representative from each jurisdiction’s Planning Department, by February 2024 to discuss and implement housing strategies. The Countywide Housing Working Group shall meet on a regular basis.
● Each jurisdiction shall annually evaluate the effectiveness of the CHWG in the implementation of programs. If the CHWG is
determined to be ineffective in
implementing any of the programs, each jurisdiction shall identify alternative
actions within six months, including a schedule to implement the alternative
actions on a semi-annual basis (e.g., actions that each jurisdiction will implement at least two times each year) for the remainder of the planning
period, to facilitate the implementation of relevant programs. 24-Feb 6th Cycle Continuous
Countywide meeting 3/10/25
Amador City, Ione, Jackson, and Sutter
Creek meet the 2nd Monday of each
month to discuss on going planning topics
and issues within the County.

Meetings
PROGRAM 2: HOUSING

ELEMENT

MONITORING/ANNUAL

REPORTING
● Review the Housing Element annually and provide opportunities for public participation, in conjunction with the submission of the Annual Progress Report to the State Department of Housing and Community Development by April 1st of each year.
1-Apr 6th Cycle Continuous
The APR is reviewed annually during a
public meeting of both the Planning
Commission and the City Council.

Other

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

Page 23 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 3: ADEQUATE
SITES
● Each jurisdiction shall develop a formal ongoing procedure to evaluate development proposals, rezones, and other land use decisions and update the inventory and capacity of sites by income groups as necessary by the end of 2023.
● Each jurisdiction to work with the Amador-Tuolumne Community Action Agency (ATCAA) and private developers on an ongoing basis to find suitable sites for affordable housing and special needs groups, including extremely low income, transitional, supportive, and single heads of households housing with an emphasis on prioritizing housing opportunities in higher resource areas.
12/1/2023 6th Cycle In Progress
Staff has been assiting a non-profit with
their application for funding for a new
project within the City.

The City evaluates development proposals,
rezones, and other land use decisions on a
case-by-case basis. Through this process,
the City monitors changes that may affect
the inventory and capacity of housing sites
by income group and updates the inventory
as needed.

Units
PROGRAM 3: ADEQUATE
SITES
● Jackson: Update Zoning Map and Development Code to require a minimum of 50% residential uses as a permitted use on at least one of the Commercial sites that is a minimum of 1.5 acres in size identified in Jackson Annex Table IV-J-1, Appendix Jackson-A, and Figure Jackson-1.
● Each jurisdiction to maintain adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA throughout the 6th Cycle pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 (No Net Loss Law):

Jackson: 27 very low, 23 low, 24 moderate, and 64 above moderate income units
31-Dec-29 6th Cycle In Progress
Update of Zoning Map and Development
Code: Not yet implemented due to staff
and budget constraints.

Implementation in progress and ongoing.

The Housing Element includes a citywide
inventory of potential infill sites. The
inventory list contained in the Housing
Element is available at the Community
Development Department offices and at
Jackson City Hall counter, and is posted on
the City’s website, www.ci.jackson.ca.us.

The inventory was updated at the time the
Housing Element was updated. Between
updates of the Housing Element, City staff
will maintain a database of the housing
inventory, and vacant or infill sites with
modifications entered each time a building
permit or use permit is approved. The
Planning staff will post the database on the
City website and make available at the City
Hall and Community Development
counters.

Units

Page 24 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 3: ADEQUATE
SITES
● Each jurisdiction shall be updated to allow residential use by right for housing developments in which at least 20 percent of the units are
affordable to lower income households for: 1) lower income sites that are vacant and have been included in the inventory from two or more consecutive planning periods, and 2) lower income sites that are underutilized (nonvacant) and have been included in the inventory from a prior planning period consistent with the requirements of Government Code Section 65583.2. The attachment to the Annex for each jurisdiction identifies lower income sites that have been included in prior Housing Elements. These provisions shall take effect immediately upon adoption and the jurisdictions shall establish additional procedures within six months of Housing Element certification.

Dec-23 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Units
PROGRAM 4:

ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNITS, JUNIOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS, AND SB 9 UNITS
● Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek to update their codes to allow ADUs, JADUs, and SB 9 units, as applicable, consistent with the requirements of State law by July May 20254 and submit the amended ADU and JADU provisions to HCD for review.
● Housing W orking Group to coordinate development of a Countywide web page by September 2024 to promote ADU and SB 9
opportunities to interested residents that includes examples of successful ADU projects, an ADU resource guide, and links to the ADU and SB 9 requirements for each jurisdiction.
● Each jurisdiction shall provide technical and resource guides online, including lot split provisions per SB 9 by December 2023.

Dec-29 6th Cycle In Progress
The Working Group has reviewed
materials provided by Amador County for
ADUs. Materials will be coordinated
between jurisdictions and made available.

Staff is currently working on informational
materials to be presented to the Planning
Commission for review and input.

Units
PROGRAM 4:

ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNITS, JUNIOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS, AND SB 9 UNITS
● Each jurisdiction shall conduct outreach and education on ADU and SB 9 options and requirements to homeowners and Homeowners’ Associations on an annual basis (2023-2029) to expand opportunities throughout the jurisdiction, with an emphasis on outreach to homeowners’ associations and property owners in higher opportunity areas within each jurisdiction.● Each jurisdiction shall pursue State funding available to assist lower- and moderate income homeowners in the construction of ADUs on an annual basis (2024, 2026, 2028). ● Each jurisdiction shall provide financial assistance to qualified property owners to build ADUs when State funds (such as CalHOME) or other funds are available on an ongoing basis.
● By December 2025, assess each jurisdiction’s progress in ADU construction; evaluate incentives to further promote ADUs if construction goals are not met.
●Jackson: 8 ADUs/JADUs and 4 SB 9 units
Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous
Planning staff will continue to pursue State
funds. If funding is available, staff will
provide assistance to qualified
homeowners.

Units
PROGRAM 5:

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

LAND ACQUISITION
Amador Countywide:
● Countywide Housing W orking Group to work with the AmadorTuolumne Community Action Agency (ATCAA) and private developers to identify potential suitable affordable housing sites for land acquisition on a regular basis.

Each Jurisdiction:
● Individual jurisdictions to evaluate sites identified by the Countywide Housing Working Group to determine site acquisition feasibility, and work with for-profit and nonprofit resources as necessary to obtain such lands.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Units

Page 25 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 5B:

HOMELESS SERVICES

COORDINATION AND

HOUSING
● Countywide, by 2027, work with developers and service providers to provide 30 new shelter or transitional housing beds, with at least 2 beds provided apiece in Amador City and Plymouth, 3 beds provided apiece in Ione, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek, and 10 beds provided apiece in Jackson and the unincorporated County. ● Beginning in 2024, Housing W orking Group shall coordinate annually with the administration, Police Department, and Planning staff of each jurisdiction has information available regarding services for the homeless and at-risk population.

Dec-27 6th Cycle Continuous
The City of Jackson has a Homeless
Outreach Coordinator that is available to
provide information to those experiencing
homelessness or at risk.

Units
PROGRAM 6:

AFFORDABILITY

TARGETS
NA NA
PROGRAM 7:

HISTORICALLY

SIGNIFICANT

STRUCTURES
NA NA
PROGRAM 8:

NEIGHBORHOOD

BEAUTIFICATION AND

HOUSING

REHABILITATION
● Countywide Housing W orking Group to identify funding sources for housing rehabilitation, weatherization, energy-efficient improvements, emergency repair, and wildland urban interface/fire hardening on an annual basis.
o Housing Working Group to coordinate with individual jurisdictions to determine if available funding should be sought at the regional level or by individual jurisdictions.
o Housing Working Group to coordinate with individual jurisdictions to identify a single entity to assist in the implementation of housing rehabilitation programs in order to provide efficient and effective assistance throughout the County.
o Potential funding sources include USDA Section 504 Home Repair, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME, and CalFIRE Wildfire Prevention Grant programs.
6/1/2023 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 8:

NEIGHBORHOOD

BEAUTIFICATION AND

HOUSING

REHABILITATION
● Individual jurisdictions to promote the available housing rehabilitation, energy efficiency, accessibility, and home improvement programs on each jurisdiction’s website, through social media, and by way of handouts available at the public counter as well as through the local real estate community by June 2023. ● Individual jurisdictions to continue to respond to code complaints as complaints are received. ● Each jurisdiction’s Planning Department shall work with property owners, residents, and Homeowner Associations to ensure safe and decent housing. Staff will identify concentrations of housing in need of repair and multi-family developments in need of significant repair and connect property owners with resources for rehabilitation and junk removal on an ongoing basis. ● Secure funding, either individually or Countywide, for rehabilitation, improvement, and/or emergency repair of housing:

Jackson: 6 extremely low, 6 very low, and 4 low income units Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous
Code complaints are reviewed by the City's
Code Enforcement Officer. As staffing is
available, additional outreach will be
completed.

The City assisted Victory Village in their
HomeKey grant applicant. The grant will
go towards rehabilitation of an existing
multifamily building, opperations of
supportive housing, and expansion.

Other

Page 26 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 9:

AFFORDABLE AND

SPECIAL NEEDS

HOUSING ASSISTANCE

AND INCENTIVES
● Countywide Housing W orking Group will review available funding sources for housing affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households and housing for special needs groups at least twice each year. ● Countywide Housing W orking Group will actively pursue federal, State, County and private funding sources that are available at the regional level and to determine the feasibility of developing a Regional Affordable Housing Trust Fund. ● Countywide Housing W orking Group will proactively reach out annually to affordable housing providers and special needs housing providers, including homeless service providers interested in constructing extremely low income housing, emergency shelters, transitional housing, and supportive housing, agricultural worker housing providers, senior and disability housing providers, and providers serving large families and/or single heads of household with children to assist in identifying appropriate sites for development and connecting providers with assistance, including fundings and incentives for housing.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous
The Housing Working Group will contine to
meet and pursue housing and funding
opportunities as they arrise.

The City assisted Victory Village in their
HomeKey grant applicant. The grant will
go towards rehabilitation of an existing
multifamily building, opperations of
supportive housing, and expansion.

Units
PROGRAM 9:

AFFORDABLE AND

SPECIAL NEEDS

HOUSING ASSISTANCE

AND INCENTIVES
● Each jurisdiction within Amador County to actively pursue federal, State, and private funding sources for affordable housing as a means of leveraging local funds and maximizing assistance, and also support developers in securing outside funding sources. If multiple projects are proposed for funding, jurisdictions shall prioritize projects that improve very low/low income access to the most resources and most positive environmental, educational, economic, and transportation outcomes. ● If interest in affordable or special needs housing exceeds federal, State, and private funding resources for affordable housing, prioritize assisting projects located in TCAC highest resource areas.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous
The City assisted Victory Village in their
HomeKey grant applicant. The grant will
go towards rehabilitation of an existing
multifamily building, opperations of
supportive housing, and expansion.

Units
PROGRAM 9:

AFFORDABLE AND

SPECIAL NEEDS

HOUSING ASSISTANCE

AND INCENTIVES
● By December 2024, each jurisdiction shall identify a menu of incentives, including permit streamlining, reduced or deferred development fees, ministerial review of minor lot line adjustments, technical assistance to acquire funding, and modification of development requirements through Planned Development overlays or similar provisions for affordable and special needs housing.

Incentives shall be specifically identified for extremely low income housing, which may include adopting priority processing, granting fee waivers or deferrals, modifying development standards, and granting concessions and incentives. Sutter Creek and Plymouth shall also identify reduced or deferred fees for deed-restricted moderate income housing. ● Each jurisdiction to promote affordable and special needs housing, as well as a variety of housing types, when reviewing and implementing Planned Development, Specific Plan, and any largescale projects to ensure new residential development provides for a variety of housing types and affordability levels.

Dec-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Units
PROGRAM 9:

AFFORDABLE AND

SPECIAL NEEDS

HOUSING ASSISTANCE

AND INCENTIVES
● To promote and incentivize affordable and special needs housing, each jurisdiction shall annually email regional affordable housing developers and non-profits the menu of incentives, the inventory of sites for very low and low income housing, a list of available financial resources, and the jurisdiction’s dedicated contact to discuss affordable housing opportunities. ● In conjunction with other programs promoting affordable housing and reducing barriers to a variety of housing types, approve and permit development of new affordable and special needs units as follows:

Jackson: 14 extremely low, 13 very low, and 23 low income units Dec-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Units

Page 27 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 10:

PRESERVATION OF

EXISTING AFFORDABLE

HOUSING
● Annually monitor each jurisdiction’s affordable housing stock to ensure that deed-restricted units are preserved. ● Should any of the assisted properties become at risk of converting to market rate, the jurisdiction(s) will work with property owners, interest groups, and the State and federal governments to ensure compliance with State law and implement the following:
o Technical Assistance: Provide technical assistance where feasible to public and non-profit agencies interested in purchasing and/or managing units at risk.
o Preservation Programs: Provide information to owners of at-risk properties regarding rehabilitation assistance and/or mortgage financing in exchange for extending affordability restrictions. o Tenant Education: Hold public hearings upon receipt of any Notice of Intent to Sell or Notice of Intent to Convert to Market Rate Housing, pursuant to Section 65863.10 of the Government Code and provide tenant education on housing rights ● Retain all assisted multifamily housing (Ione – 43 units, Jackson – 258 unit, and Sutter Creek – 34 units)
Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous
The City of Jackson will contue to annually
monitor deed-restricted affordable housing
units. In 2025, no afforable housing units
were lost and no properties were identified
as at risk of conversion.

Units
PROGRAM 11: PRESERVE

MULTIFAMILY AND

MOBILE HOME

OPPORTUNITIES
● Update the code by December 2025 to establish provisions addressing the conversion or demolition of multifamily rental housing and mobile home parks with the intent of retaining multifamily units (701 units as identified in Background Report Table II-25) and mobile homes (1,432 units as identified in Background Report Table II-25) in all jurisdictions and assisting any households subject to relocation due to a multifamily or mobilehome park demolition or conversion.

The provisions shall address:
o Identification of affected households by income, household size, and special housing needs
o Notification to households at least 6 months prior to a required move-out date.
o Assistance to all lower income and special needs households in identifying affordable housing opportunities.
o Moving costs to all affected households.
o Rental assistance for a minimum period of time to all lower income households who are not able to procure housing that is affordable to their income group (extremely low, very low, low).
o Option for all affected households to receive priority for any new or rehabilitated housing built on the same site within 3 years of moveout.

Dec-25 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Households
PROGRAM 12: FAIR

HOUSING SERVICES
● As a means of furthering fair housing education and outreach in the community, each jurisdiction in Amador County will advertise the fair housing program through placement of fair housing information brochures on their websites, at the public counters, and in the local library(ies) by December 2023. ● Each jurisdiction to provide an annual outreach event to promote fai housing and to educate the community, landlords, and real estate professionals regarding fair housing requirements. ● Each jurisdiction shall continue to provide referrals to CDFEH and HUD and any locally designated providers on an ongoing basis, including promoting fair housing practices, review and enforcement assistance with fair housing complaints, and education to housing providers.

Dec-23 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Households
PROGRAM 12: FAIR

HOUSING SERVICES
● Housing W orking Group to coordinate with ATCAA in 2023/2024 to determine if ATCAA can offer fair housing services to all County residents. If ATCAA cannot offer fair housing services, the Housing Working Group to contact fair housing advocates to identify interest in providing fair housing services to the County and identify a single Countywide point of contact for fair housing concerns by the end of 2024.

Dec-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Households

Page 28 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 13:

AFFIRMATIVELY

FURTHER FAIR HOUSING
● Implement measures to affirmatively further fair housing on an ongoing basis, and as further outlined in Table 1. Dec-29 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Households PROGRAM 14:

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

RESOURCES FOR

RENTERS AND OWNERS
● Develop an outreach program by December 2024 to connect lower income residents and the lower income workforce with new rental and ownership opportunities and access to resources for home ownership, housing rehabilitation, fair housing, temporary and longterm assistance in the event of a disaster, and other housing assistance programs as those become available, promoting fair housing choice and access to safe and decent housing within the community. Information shall be provided on each jurisdiction’s website and social media channels, via announcements at the Board of Supervisors and City Council meetings, at the public counters, and in the local library(ies).
● Update outreach program materials at least annually to reflect correct contacts and program information.

Dec-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Households
PROGRAM 15A: ADOPT A

REASONABLE

ACCOMMODATION

PROCEDURE FOR

HOUSING
● Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek:

Review and amend the Municipal Code a necessary to provide individuals with disabilities reasonable accommodation (in full compliance with Senate Bill 520) in rules, policies, practices, and procedures that may be necessary to ensure equal access to housing by December 2023. Include the following information:
o Providing notice to the public of the availability of an accommodation process. The notice will be provided at all counters where applications are made for a permit, license, or other authorization for siting, funding, development, or use of housing. o Procedures for requesting reasonable accommodation, including preparation of a Fair Housing Accommodation Request form and designating the appropriate individual, committee, commission, or body responsible for acting on requests.
o
Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous Municipal Code is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Persons
PROGRAM 15A: ADOPT A

REASONABLE

ACCOMMODATION

PROCEDURE FOR

HOUSING
o Review procedures for requests for reasonable accommodation, including provisions for issuing a written decision within 30 days of the date of the application.
o Criteria to be used in considering requests for reasonable accommodation.
o Appeal procedure for denial of a request for reasonable accommodation. The procedure should establish that there is no fee for processing requests for reasonable accommodation or for appealing an adverse decision related to a request for reasonable accommodation.
● All Jurisdictions: Create a public information brochure on reasonable accommodation for disabled persons and provide that information on each jurisdiction’s website.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Not yet implemented. The Working Group
will put together information on reasonable
accommodations for the public.

Persons
PROGRAM 15B: SMOKEFREE MULTI-UNIT

HOUSING
● In 2024, review methods to reduce exposure to second-hand smoke in multi-unit and mixed use residential projects and identify at least three methods for implementation in 2025-2029. Methods may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may include:
o Consideration of a smoke-free ordinance, encouraging compliance through education, signage requirements, and property manager actions rather than police, fines, or evictions.
o Targeted education to landlords and tenants on the benefits of a smoke-free housing policy.
o Targeted outreach to landlords with resources including language to include in leases, assistance available to purchase signage, and local resources for residents who want to quit tobacco.

Dec-24 6th Cycle In Progress
On March 10, 2025 the Working Group met
with Amador County Public Health to
coordinate a draft Smoke Free MUH
Ordinance.

Other

Page 29 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 16: FEDERAL

VOUCHER PROGRAM
● Countywide Housing W orking Group to contact the Stanislaus County Regional Housing Authority (StanCoHA) and ATCAA annually to invite StanCoHA to attend a meeting and provide information regarding the number of vouchers issued within the county, to identify opportunities to access additional assistance programs, including the Family Unification Program, currently unavailable in Amador County, to determine if additional vouchers may become available, and to identify if there are unused vouchers that should be advertised to County residents.
● If vouchers are available to Amador County residents or the waitlist opens up, the Countywide Housing Working Group shall coordinate outreach via each jurisdiction’s website and announcements at the Board of Supervisors and City Council meetings.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
The Working Group has not yet contacted
Stanislaus County Regional housing
Authority for ATCAA regarding voucher
availablity or program outreach.

Other
PROGRAM 16: FEDERAL

VOUCHER PROGRAM
● Continue to facilitate the use of the HCV and other Housing Authority and ATCAA programs throughout the County by advertising programs semiannually (double the current advertising schedule) on each jurisdiction’s website, in community newsletters, and via each jurisdiction’s social media accounts to reach a Countywide audience. ● Conduct annual targeted education to landlords and tenants in the area of the County with the highest proportions of persons with disabilities and in areas with the highest resources.
● Provide information on the availability of the Housing Choice Voucher Program on the County’s and each jurisdiction’s website and review information bi-annually to ensure contact information is correct.
● W ork with StanCoHA to increase the number of households receiving Housing Choice Vouchers by 5%.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
Each jurisdiction to complete the following zoning and development amendments to its code to streamline definitions, encourage and support a variety of housing types, including special needs housing and affordable housing, by July 2024 (note: refer to Chapter III (Housing Constraints) for a detailed analysis of revisions required to each jurisdiction’s code):
o Family (Amador County, Amador City, Sutter Creek): Define ”family” and “household” to include unrelated members of a household who reside together, to not regulate the relationship of members, and to impose no restriction on the number of persons who may reside together as a family or household.
o Low Barrier Navigation Centers (Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek): Define and permit low barrier navigation centers consistent with the requirements of Government Code Sections 65660 through 65668, including treating low barrier navigation centers as a by-right use in areas zoned for mixed use and in nonresidential zones permitting multi-family uses (if applicable).

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Transitional and Supportive Housing (Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek): Revise as necessary to ensure that transitional and supportive housing are allowed in residential and mixed-use zones in accordance with Government Code Section 65583(c)(3), and to allow eligible supportive housing in zones where multi-family and mixed uses are permitted in accordance with Government Code Sections 65650 through 65656. o Special Needs Housing (Amador County, Amador City, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek): Revise as necessary to ensure that special needs housing is accommodated in accordance with California Health and Safety (HSC) Code Section 1566.3, which establishes requirements for residential facilities that serve six or fewer persons including that residential care homes serving six or fewer persons will be treated in the same manner as a residence of the same type and not be subject to additional standards (such as parking). Additional jurisdictionspecific updates are as follows:

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other

Page 30 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Persons with Disabilities - Group homes 7 or more persons (Amador County, Amador City, Ione, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek): Permit these uses in all zones allowing residential uses with objectivity and only subject to the requirements of other residential uses of the same type in the same zone.
o Employee Housing (Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek): Ensure that employee housing serving six or fewer employees shall be deemed a single family structure and shall be treated subject to the standards for a single family dwelling in the same zone per requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5.
o Farmworker Housing (Amador County, Jackson, Sutter Creek):

Ensure that agricultural employee housing is allowed in zones that permit agricultural uses consistent with the requirements of Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.6 and 17021.8.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Emergency Shelters: (Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, and Sutter Creek): Revise as necessary to ensure that emergency shelters are accommodated in accordance with the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and Government Code Section 65583, which requires each jurisdiction to identify one or more zoning districts where emergency shelters are allowed without a discretionary permit, including ensuring that emergency shelters are allowed in zones where residential uses are also permitted consistent with the requirements of Government Code Section 65583(a)(4) and are defined consistent with Government Code Sections 65582 and 65583(a)(4)(C). Require sufficient parking to accommodate all staff working in an emergency shelter, provided that the standards will not require more parking for emergency shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone.
o Emergency Shelters: (Jackson): Revise to allow 25 beds within each emergency shelter.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Emergency Shelters (All jurisdictions): Update the definition of emergency shelter to be consistent with Government Code Section 65583(a)(4)(C) and ensure that emergency shelters are permitted ministerially when ancillary to permitted places of worship and churches.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Application Streamlining (Amador County, Amador City, Plymouth, Sutter Creek, and Jackson): To facilitate residential development and to comply with State law, each jurisdiction will be updated to ensure that eligible multi-family projects with an affordable housing component are provided streamlined review and are subject only to objective design standards consistent with relevant provisions of SB 35 and SB 330, as provided for by applicable sections of the Government Code, including but not limited to Sections 65905.5, 65913.4, 65940, 65941.1, 65950, and 66300. State law defines objective design standards as those that “involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant and public official prior to submittal.” Each jurisdiction will review and modify the Design Review criteria to ensure application processing timelines comply with the requirements of applicable State laws, including Government Code Sections 65950-65957.5), streamline and simplify the process, including a limitation on the maximum number of hearings per project, and ensure objective standards and findings are applied to projects subject to Design Review.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other

Page 31 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Objective Design & Development Standards (Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek). Each jurisdiction will adopt objective design and development standards for multifamily housing, including ministerial (by-right) residential and mixed-use development, and will ensure that the standards, including floor area ratio, unit size, height, setback, and parking requirements, accommodate the maximum densities permitted, and provide flexibility with the design of building types and units to accommodate irregular lots and steep slopes. These objective standards will replace any subjective standards, including site plan review findings, design review standards, and other standards required for single family and multifamily housing or will remove or include objective definitions and/or illustrations of any subjective terms, such as “compatibility”, “orderly”, “harmonious”, “character”, and “integrity”.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Density Bonus (Amador County, Amador City, Ione, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek). Revise to reflect current requirements of the State’s density bonus law, including alternative parking ratios, which shall also be reflected in the jurisdiction’s parking standards section(s) of its code, including 1 space per studio (0 bedroom) and 1- bedroom units and 1.5 spaces per 2- and 3-bedroom units for projects that include affordable and special needs housing, and establish application requirements and decision-making criteria (Government Code Section 65915).
o Reasonable Accommodations (Amador County, Amador City, Jackson, Plymouth, and Sutter Creek). Provide for reasonable accommodation for persons with a disability consistent with the HCD Reasonable Accommodation Model Ordinance, including objective findings for the approval of a reasonable accommodation application. o Accessibility (All jurisdictions): Require new development projects with 10 or more units to include accessibility options for buyers as part of each home plan.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Density Range (All jurisdictions): Require new development on the sites identified for very low, low, and moderate income to occur at 75% of allowed densities or higher, with exceptions provided for sitespecific development constraints, affordable housing, and special needs housing.
o Conversion of Multifamily Rental to Ownership or Non-Residential Uses: Establish provisions to ensure that the conversion of multifamily rental to ownership or non-residential uses addresses the potential for displacement of households, including adequate notice (6 or more months), identification of affordable housing opportunities in the region, assistance to lower income and special needs housing with locating replacement housing, moving assistance, and priority for any residents interested in new ownership opportunities at the location.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other

Page 32 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 17:

DEVELOPMENT

CODE/ZONING CODE

AMENDMENTS
o Reduce Constraints to a Variety of Housing Types:

Jackson:
- Establish parking requirements for mixed use developments, allow for shared parking between residential and non-residential uses, remove parking requirement for secondary residential units, and allow a carport instead of a fully enclosed garage where required for duplexes and multifamily dwellings.
- Limit development of single family units in the RD, RM, and RH units to existing lots of 6,000 s.f. or less, new lots of 4,000 s.f. or less, and affordable (moderate, low, and very low income) projects. - Update Chapter 17.32 to allow additional alternatives to on-site home production, including dedication of land, payment of in-lieu fees, and a reduced requirement to the extent that a developer project demonstrates it is infeasible to meet the affordable housing requirement.
- Ensure that the Objective Design & Development Standards update the Architectural Regulations to provide objective standards and objectively define subjective terms.

Jul-24 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 18: CODE
REVIEW
All Jurisdictions ● Review and update local codes to address requirements of State law. Codes shall be reviewed every 3 years to implement any housing laws or any changes identified, including changes identified by HCD as part of its review of implementation of the Housing Element or review of ordinances where provided by the Government Code, to comply with existing housing laws. ● Review local code requirements annually to ensure that amendments are made where necessary to reduce impacts to life and property. ● Review updates to the California Building Standards Code on a triennial basis and adopt updates to code requirements accordingly.

Jackson ● Review implementation of the Affordable Housing Requirement every 5 years (by December 2027) to ensure it is not an impediment to housing production.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous Codes are reviewed on an ongoing basis.

Updates will made done as needed. Other
PROGRAM 19: WATER

AND WASTEWATER

INFRASTRUCTURE

CAPACITY
● In 2023, the Housing W orking Group shall meet with AW A to identify necessary steps and resources to address water and wastewater system improvements where needed to accommodate the RHNA. ● Housing W orking Group to identify methods to encourage water conservation and reduce wastewater effluent by December 2025, including coordinating with the water and wastewater providers to promote conservation and reviewing opportunities to increase efficiencies in new construction and rehabilitation projects. ● Continue to work cooperatively with AW A, ARSA, and other agencies that own or operate water and sewer infrastructure on an ongoing basis and each jurisdiction shall review efforts annually and the Housing Working Group shall meet with water and wastewater providers at least annually.. ● Housing W orking Group to support infrastructure providers in pursuing funding to complete necessary improvements or to assist developers and agencies to complete these capital improvement projects as necessary on an ongoing basis to increase the availability of housing for low and very low income households, with efforts to identify potential applications and submittal of applications at least annually.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous
The Working Group will continue to work
with both AWA and ARSA on an as
needed basis to address infrastructure
constraints.

Other

Page 33 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 19: WATER

AND WASTEWATER

INFRASTRUCTURE

CAPACITY
● Housing W orking Group to investigate establishment of assessment districts with a capital facilities fee on an ongoing basis to assist in funding infrastructure improvements by December 2023. ● Submit a funding application to the USDA’s Small Communities Rural Utilities Service Grants & Loans Program annually. ● Each jurisdiction shall adopt any necessary fee programs and shall seek funding resources to support improvement and expansion of water and wastewater systems to accommodate the RHNA by December 2025. ● The City of Ione shall develop a program to complete wastewater system improvements to expand its treatment capacity by 2024/2025 in order to accommodate its RHNA. ● Coordinate with AW A and the cities to update Figures III-1 and III-2 every 3 years (December 2026, December 2029) to identify parcels that are proximate to existing water and sewer service and planned water and sewer service as well as parcels where the cost to extend services would be considerable to assist developers in targeting locations for housing proposals.

Dec-29 6th Cycle In Progress
The Working Group will continue to work
with both AWA and ARSA on an as
needed basis to address infrastructure
constraints.

Other
PROGRAM 19: WATER

AND WASTEWATER

INFRASTRUCTURE

CAPACITY
● W here applicable, use development agreements or other mechanisms to ensure fair-share funding of off-site infrastructure and facility improvements on an on-going basis and review projects at least annually to ensure implementation. ● Following adoption of the Housing Element, each jurisdiction shall provide the adopted Housing Element within 30 days to its water and sewer providers and shall include a cover letter identifying the requirements of Government Code Section 65589.7(a) requiring priority service for developments that provide housing for lower income households.

Dec-29 6th Cycle In Progress
As projects are reviewed by the City, the
use of a Development Agreement will be
considered.

Other
PROGRAM 20:

PARTNERSHIPS WITH

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

DEVELOPERS
● Facilitate land divisions, lot line adjustments, and specific plans resulting in parcel sizes that facilitate multi-family developments affordable to lower income households. ● W ork with property owners and non-profit developers to target and market the availability of sites with the best potential for development, including annual outreach to property owners and non-profit developers identifying very low and low income sites included in the inventory of residential land. ● Host an annual meeting with affordable housing developers and non profits to identify housing opportunities and to identify City programs and incentives that support affordable housing development through provision of land write-downs, regulatory incentives, and/or direct assistance. ● Annually meet with County representatives to discuss farmworker housing needs and to identify opportunities and potential applications for funding.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented Other PROGRAM 21: CHILD

CARE PROGRAM
● Continue to promote the provision of childcare in conjunction with residential development, including affordable housing projects, on an ongoing basis.

Dec-29 6th Cycle Continuous Childcare is an allowed use in all residental zones. Other
PROGRAM 22:

APPLICATION

PROCESSING

PROCEDURES
● Review application processing procedures in 2025 and 2028 and make any necessary amendments to reduce constraints to housing approvals and ensure development proposals are processed in accordance with State law, including the time periods identified by the Permit Streamlining Act.

Dec-25 6th Cycle Continuous
Applicant process, procedures, and forms
are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Other

Page 34 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 23: ONGOING

COMMUNITY EDUCATION

AND OUTREACH
● Provide information on ADUs, JADUs, SB 9 units, and streamlined permitting opportunities for eligible housing development projects at the public counter of each jurisdiction, at local libraries, and on each jurisdiction’s website by June 2023 and update information biannually. ● Amador County to maintain the County’s existing webpage providing links and contact information for of the County’s housing and jobtraining organizations (e.g., Amador County Association of Realtors, Gold Country Alliance for the Mentally Ill, ATCAA, Voices for Families, Area 12 Agency on Aging, Amador Affordable Housing Coalition, Amador Economic Development Corporation, Amador County
Department of Health & Human Services, and similar organizations) and review page annually to update contact information as necessary.
● Provide information regarding housing rehabilitation, energy efficiency programs, weatherization, emergency repair assistance, and free energy audits (when available) at the public counter of each jurisdiction, at local libraries, and on each jurisdiction’s website by June 2023 and update information bi-annually.

Jun-23 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 23: ONGOING

COMMUNITY EDUCATION

AND OUTREACH
● In coordination with ATCAA, encourage low income homeowners or renters to apply for free energy audits and home weatherization through ATCAA by June 2023.
o Provide handouts at the public counter and website of each jurisdiction.
o Promote these programs through the senior centers for seniors seeking assistance with home maintenance.
● Continue to make available published materials and resource referral information for renters on the following subjects: housing discrimination, landlord/tenant relations, access to legal aid services for housing complaints, and information on housing advocacy programs and similar information. Information should be made available at each jurisdiction’s public counter and website, at the Health and Human Services Agency, at the County library (and its branches), and similar locations where individuals may be in need of fair housing information by June 2023.
● Provide information on the availability of the Housing Choice Voucher Program at each jurisdiction’s public counter and website by June 2023.

Jun-23 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not yet implemented due to staff and budget constraints. Other
PROGRAM 24:

GOVERNMENTAL

TRANSPARENCY
All jurisdictions to provide fiscal documents to ensure transparency pursuant to Government Code Section 65940 no later than December 2024:

● Jackson to update its website to include the five previous annual fee reports and the archive of impact fee nexus studies, cost of service studies, or equivalent, conducted on or after January 1, 2018.

Dec-24 6th Cycle Completed Website has been updated. Other Finance & Personnel

Page 35 of 67 ends

PROGRAM 25: ENERGY

CONSERVATION

INITIATIVES
● Continue to enforce the State of California’s Title 24 energy requirements on an ongoing basis. ● Continue to explore ways to promote energy conservation and sustainability, with a focus on reducing energy usage and energyrelated costs in new and existing residential development throughout each jurisdiction, with the Housing Working Group meeting at least annually to address this issue and summarize best practices. ● Each jurisdiction to advertise available programs, with an emphasis on outreach to lower income households, to address energy-efficient improvements to single and multi-family units on an ongoing basis and assist households with reducing energy-related costs on each jurisdiction's website and at the Planning Counters; information shall be provided by August 2024 and reviewed and updated at least biannually (by August 2026, 2028). ● Each jurisdiction to provide outreach and education to developers, architects, and residents at least annually to provide information on how to incorporate sustainability in project design, as well as in existing structures.

Aug-24 6th Cycle Continuous
Title 24 regulations continue to be required
during the building permit review process.

Information on energy savings programs
are provide when available.

Other
PROGRAM 25: ENERGY

CONSERVATION

INITIATIVES
● Participate in the Amador County Energy Savings W orking Group and support implementation of the County’s Energy Action Plan, including PG&E programs and ATCAA programs with Housing Working Group members attending an Energy Savings Working Group meeting at least bi-annually (2024, 2026, 2028). ● Continue to collaborate with PG&E to install energy-efficient lighting through sharing information on each jurisdiction’s website by August 2024 and reviewing and updating information as necessary at least biannually (August 2026, 2028).. ● On an ongoing basis, continue to provide residents with the local PG&E representative’s contact information when an inquiry is made regarding energy efficiency and review contact information at least annually (December of each year).

Aug-26 6th Cycle Not Yet Started The Countywide Housing Working Group will address this program in 2026. Other

Page 36 of 67 ends

U.S. Department of Homeland Security
FEMA Region 9
1111 Broadway, Suite 1200
Oakland, CA 94607-4052
www.fema.gov
February 13, 2026
Sgt. Matt Girton
Office of Emergency Services Coordinator
Amador County Office of Emergency Services
700 Court Street
Jackson, CA 95642
Reference: Hazard Mitigation Plan Approvable Pending Adoption Amador County, CA
Dear Sgt. Matt Girton:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has completed its review of the 2025 Amador County Hazard Mitigation Plan and has determined that the plan is eligible for final approval, pending its formal adoption by Amador County and all participating jurisdictions. Please refer to the enclosed list of jurisdictions currently considered Approvable Pending Adoption (APA).

Formal adoption documentation must be submitted to FEMA Region 9 by at least one participating jurisdiction within one calendar year from the date of this letter. If no adoption is received within that timeframe, the plan must be updated and resubmitted for review.

FEMA will issue formal approval of the plan upon receipt of the adoption documentation. Once approved, all other participating jurisdictions must adopt the plan within five calendar years of the approval date. Adoption of the plan is required to maintain eligibility for funding under FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) programs. All funding requests will be evaluated based on the specific eligibility criteria and requirements of the applicable HMA program.

Please note that while local hazard mitigation plans may include additional content to meet Element H: Additional State Requirements or other local objectives, FEMA’s APA status does not constitute review or approval of any content exceeding FEMA’s standard mitigation planning requirements.

If you have any questions regarding the planning or review processes, please contact the FEMA Region 9 Hazard Mitigation Planning Team at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Alison Kearns
Planning and Implementation Branch Chief
Mitigation Division
FEMA Region 9

Page 37 of 67 ends

Amador County Hazard Mitigation Plan Approvable Pending Adoption Notice February 13, 2026

Page 2 of 3 ends

www.fema.gov
Enclosures (2)
Amador County Plan Review Tool, dated February 13, 2026 Status of Participating Jurisdictions, dated February 13, 2026 cc: Robyn Fennig, State Hazard Mitigation Officer, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Victoria LaMar-Haas, Hazard Mitigation Planning Chief, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services

Page 38 of 67 ends

Amador County Hazard Mitigation Plan Approvable Pending Adoption Notice February 13, 2026

Page 3 of 3 ends

www.fema.gov
Status of Participating Jurisdictions as of February 13, 2026 Jurisdictions Adopted and Approved
# Jurisdiction Adoption Receipt Date
Jurisdictions Approvable Pending Adoption
# Jurisdiction
1 Amador County
2 City of Amador City
3 City of Ione
4 City of Jackson
5 City of Plymouth
6 City of Sutter Creek
7 Amador Water Agency
8 Jackson Valley Irrigation District

Page 39 of 67 ends

Page 1 of 5 ends

Updated 11.20.2024
Assembly Bill 2140 (AB 2140) Fact Sheet
Information for Counties and Cities
What is AB 2140?
Passed in 2006, Assembly Bill No. 2140 (AB 2140) allows California counties and cities to be considered for additional state cost-share on eligible Public Assistance projects by adopting their current, FEMA-approved local hazard mitigation plans (LHMPs) into the Safety Element of their General Plan. This adoption, along with other requirements, makes the county or city eligible to be considered for part or all of its local-share costs on eligible Public Assistance projects to be provided by the state through the California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA). For more information regarding Public Assistance, please visit Cal OES Public Assistance Division.

How Can AB 2140 Help Counties, Cities, and Your Citizens? For eligible Public Assistance projects, the typical local (non-federal) cost share is 25% of the total project cost. CDAA can allow the state to pay up to 18.75% of the nonfederal share, that would otherwise fall upon the county or city, to pay for eligible Public Assistance projects once the legislature has passed a bill allowing additional state funding after a disaster occurs. Upon approval of the legislature, counties and cities that are AB 2140 compliant are also eligible to be considered for the remaining

6.25% local share to be funded by the state, essentially covering the entire local-share cost for eligible Public Assistance projects. Please note that funding is not guaranteed.

What Do You Need to Know?  AB 2140 is not a requirement; it is an optional state incentive to help counties and cities become more resilient to natural hazards. Be sure to work with your planning department as the process proceeds.
 There are multiple steps that must be completed before Cal OES can issue a letter of AB 2140 compliance. These steps are listed in detail below in the section What Are the Steps to Become AB 2140 Compliant?  Be aware that adopting the LHMP via a formal resolution is a federal requirement for FEMA to officially “approve” the LHMP and does not make your jurisdiction automatically AB 2140 compliant. AB 2140 is a state incentive which also requires adopting your LHMP into the Safety Element of your General Plan.

However, both adoptions can take place at the same time using the same adoption resolution.
 AB 2140 compliance expires when the LHMP expires. You must re-adopt the LHMP itself AND adopt the LHMP into the Safety Element of your General Plan each time you update your LHMP in order to continue compliance.  For multi-jurisdiction hazard mitigation plans (MJHMPs), the county and each city in the MJHMP must adopt its own specific annex into its own General Plan

Page 40 of 67 ends

Page 2 of 5 ends

Updated 11.20.2024
Assembly Bill 2140 (AB 2140) Fact Sheet
Information for Counties and Cities
Safety Element. Annex jurisdictions are not covered under the county’s adoption.
 Special districts are not eligible for AB 2140 compliance as they do not have General Plans.
 For additional information on General Plan and Safety Element requirements please contact the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR).

What Are the Steps to Become AB 2140 Compliant?

1. Complete and submit an LHMP to the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES). A jurisdiction must have a current, FEMA-approved LHMP. a. Cal OES will provide an initial review and, if applicable, request required revisions based on the FEMA LHMP Guidance.
b. Once Cal OES has determined the plan has met all FEMA LHMP requirements, Cal OES will then forward the LHMP to FEMA for final review and approval.
c. For questions or assistance, please contact the Cal OES Local Mitigation Planning Unit at [email protected].

2. LHMP adoption AND adoption into the Safety Element of the General Plan a. Adopt the LHMP via a formal resolution following your jurisdiction’s typical procedure once FEMA has issued “approvable pending adoption” (APA) status. Once FEMA receives a signed adoption resolution, they can then issue an official “approval” notice for your LHMP.
i. A sample adoption resolution for your LHMP is provided in Appendix B of the FEMA LHMP Policy Guide.
b. At this time, you may also choose to adopt the LHMP into the Safety Element of your General Plan using the same resolution in order to meet a requirement of AB 2140 compliance (see step 3).
i. Within the Safety Element update adoption resolution, there must be language specific to adopting the LHMP into the Safety Element of the General Plan, and the resolution must be signed and approved before the LHMP expires. This adoption can occur at the same time the LHMP is adopted to comply with FEMA requirements, or it can occur after the LHMP is approved but before it expires after five years.
c. At any time during the life of an approved LHMP a jurisdiction may choose to adopt the LHMP into the Safety Element of their General Plan, however, when the LHMP expires, AB 2140 compliance will also expire.

Page 41 of 67 ends

Page 3 of 5 ends

Updated 11.20.2024
Assembly Bill 2140 (AB 2140) Fact Sheet
Information for Counties and Cities

3. Safety Element Language
a. The local agency must include language specific to the LHMP within the Safety Element of their General Plan and make the LHMP easily accessible in its entirety as a weblink, appendices, or attachment (see step 4).
b. Jurisdictions should follow their own internal procedures for Safety Element language, however, below is sample language that may be used:
i. “The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for the [Add Jurisdiction Name] planning area was developed in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) and followed FEMA’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan guidance. The LHMP incorporates a process where hazards are identified and profiled, the people and facilities at risk are analyzed, and mitigation actions are developed to reduce or eliminate hazard risk. The implementation of these mitigation actions, which include both short and long-term strategies, involve planning, policy changes, programs, projects, and other activities. (Add a web link or language directing to the LHMP attachment or appendix within the Safety Element. Discussed further in step #4 below.)”

4. LHMP Accessibility and Links
a. The current, approved LHMP must be easily accessible and available to the public viewing the Safety Element. This requirement can be met by linking the LHMP electronically to the General Plan Safety Element or by including the LHMP in its entirety as an attachment or appendix in the Safety Element and referencing its location with the plan. b. Web links should be monitored so that they are in working condition and bring the viewer to the most recent approved version of the LHMP.

5. E-mail the link to the updated General Plan Safety Element web page along with the signed adoption resolution(s) to the Cal OES AB 2140 inbox [email protected] for review and approval.

Page 42 of 67 ends

Page 4 of 5 ends

Updated 11.20.2024
Assembly Bill 2140 (AB 2140) Fact Sheet
Information for Counties and Cities
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Who do I contact if I have additional questions regarding my LHMP or AB 2140 status?
A: For questions regarding AB 2140 compliance please contact [email protected]. For questions pertaining to your LHMP, please contact the Cal OES Local Hazard Mitigation Planning team at
[email protected].

Q: If a county is AB 2140 compliant, are its cities automatically covered? A: No. Each county and city must:

1. Have either your own stand-alone LHMP or have an annex in a MJHMP.

2. Have adopted your approved stand-alone LHMP or annex into your own General Plan Safety Element.

Q: Can a jurisdiction obtain AB 2140 compliance before their LHMP is approvable pending adoption (APA) from FEMA?
A: No. The LHMP must be either APA or officially “approved” by FEMA before you may adopt to obtain AB 2140 compliance.

Q: Are special districts covered under their county’s LHMP since they do not have their own general plan?
A: No. Special districts are not qualified for additional cost share under AB 2140 because they do not have a General Plan.

Q: If a county or city becomes AB 2140 compliant, does this compliance last forever?
A: No. AB 2140 compliance expires on the day the LHMP expires. You must re-adopt your LHMP into your General Plan Safety Element each time you update your LHMP.

Q: Once a county or city becomes AB 2140 compliant, are they guaranteed funding?
A: No. You will be eligible to be considered for additional CDAA funding upon approval of the legislature. There is no guarantee of funding.

Q: Can a city or county adopt their LHMP to obtain AB 2140 compliance at the same time they adopt their LHMP to fulfill the FEMA requirement when the LHMP is approvable pending adoption?
A: Yes, this is a viable option. It is crucial, however, that Cal OES receives a copy of the adoption resolution to ensure compliance. Your jurisdiction is

Page 43 of 67 ends

Page 5 of 5 ends

Updated 11.20.2024
Assembly Bill 2140 (AB 2140) Fact Sheet
Information for Counties and Cities
not compliant until Cal OES has documentation and has issued a compliance letter.

Q: If the actual LHMP is added to the General Plan, but not within the Safety Element, is language still required in the Safety Element? A: Yes, language specific to the LHMP and a web link, appendix, or language within the Safety Element that directs the public to the most current, approved LHMP in its entirety is required to be in the Safety Element.

AB 2140 Compliance Checklist
In order to issue a letter of AB 2140 compliance, Cal OES will review and verify that your jurisdiction has performed the following:
 Has a current, FEMA-approved or approvable pending adoption (APA) LHMP.  Formally adopted the LHMP via resolution.
 Formally adopted the most current, approved LHMP into the Safety Element of your General Plan via resolution.
 Included language within the Safety Element of your General Plan that references your LHMP.
 Included a web link, appendix, or language within the Safety Element that directs the public to the most current, approved LHMP in its entirety.  E-mailed the link to the updated General Plan Safety Element web page along with the signed, adoption resolution(s) to the Cal OES AB 2140 inbox [email protected] for review and approval.

For AB 2140 Questions: [email protected]
For LHMP Questions: [email protected]
For Public Assistance and CDAA Questions: [email protected]

Page 44 of 67 ends

Resolution No. 2026-07

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JACKSON ADOPTING THE 2025 AMADOR COUNTY LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE (OCTOBER 2025)
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within the City of Jackson; and
WHEREAS, the City of Jackson has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as the 2025 Amador County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (October 2025) in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the 2025 Amador County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (October 2025) identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in the City of Jackson from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and WHEREAS, adoption by the City Council demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the 2025 Amador County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (October 2025); and
WHEREAS, the City Council, seeking FEMA approval of the hazard mitigation plan, desires to comply with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act and to augment its emergency planning efforts by formally adopting the 2025 Amador County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (October 2025) by reference into the Safety Element of the General Plan in accordance with the requirements of AB 2140; and
WHEREAS, in 2006, the State of California adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 2140, which added provisions specifying what is to be included in a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) and requiring a linkage between a local jurisdiction’s LHMP and the Safety Element of its General Plan. AB 2140 requires a jurisdiction to adopt the LHMP into the Safety Element of the General Plan in order to be fully eligible for disaster relief funding under the California Disaster Assistance Act; and
WHEREAS, AB 2140 can be met by either including LHMP language specific to AB 2140 as part of the Safety Element or by incorporating the LHMP by reference into the Safety Element of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Jackson has a current Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which includes an assessment of the City’s risk and vulnerability related to natural and other identified hazards and a comprehensive mitigation strategy that includes actions and projects designed to mitigate or reduce the impacts of those hazards and increase community resiliency; and

Page 45 of 67 ends

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to formally adopt and incorporate by reference the most current Local Hazard Mitigation Plan into the Safety Element of the City of Jackson General Plan, which should be consulted when addressing known hazards to ensure the general health and safety of people within the City of Jackson, and the most current version of the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is available on the City of Jackson website at:
https://www.ci.jackson.ca.us/community_development.php;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF JACKSON,
CALIFORNIA, THAT:

In accordance with the City of Jackson’s procedures for adopting resolutions, the City Council adopts the 2025 Amador County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (October 2025).

While content related to the City of Jackson may require revisions to meet the plan approval requirements, changes occurring after adoption will not require the City of Jackson to re-adopt any further iterations of the plan. Subsequent plan updates following the approval period for this plan will require separate adoption resolutions.

BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Jackson adopts the 2025 Amador County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (October 2025) by reference into the Safety Element of the City of Jackson General Plan in accordance with the requirements of AB 2140; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council will submit this adoption resolution to the California Office of Emergency Services and FEMA Region IX officials to enable the plan’s final approval in accordance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and to establish conformance with the requirement of AB 2140.

The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Jackson at a regular meeting on the 23rd day of March 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

CITY OF JACKSON
____________________________________
Chad Simmons, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
John Georgette, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM By:
____________________________
Josh Nelson, City Attorney

Page 46 of 67 ends

CITY OF JACKSON
Council Meeting Memorandum
Monday, March 23rd, 2026 – 6:30 PM Regular Meeting
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Carl Simpson, City Manager
Date: March 19, 2026
Agenda Item 6c: Establishing fee and program schedule for 2026 Swim Program & Schedule
Recommendation
That the City Council approve the proposed fee increases for the 2026 Swim Program and Schedule.

Summary and Discussion
The City’s pool operations and swim programs have historically operated at a significant subsidy and have not achieved full cost recovery. While these programs provide important recreational and community benefits, the gap between revenues and expenditures continues to widen.

In Fiscal Year 2025, pool operations generated approximately $72,000 in revenue, compared to approximately $170,000 in total expenditures. This structural deficit is largely driven by rising operational costs, including increased expenses for maintenance, pool chemicals, utilities, and staffing. These cost pressures are expected to persist and potentially intensify given ongoing economic conditions.

To address this imbalance and reduce the burden on the General Fund, staff is proposing targeted fee adjustments across several program areas. These adjustments are designed to more accurately reflect the true cost of service delivery while remaining competitive and reasonable compared to similar agencies.

Notably, the Junior Lifeguard Training program fee is proposed to increase from $160 to $270.

This adjustment reflects a substantial enhancement in the program, including nearly double the instructional hours, expanded training components, and increased staffing requirements to meet safety and certification standards.

Absent these fee adjustments, the City will continue to experience increasing subsidies for aquatic programming, placing additional strain on limited General Fund resources. The proposed fee schedule represents a balanced approach that supports program sustainability, aligns fees

Page 47 of 67 ends

more closely with service costs, and ensures the continued availability of high-quality aquatic programs for the community.

For these reasons, staff recommends City Council approval of the proposed 2026 Swim Program fee schedule.

Page 48 of 67 ends

M artha Quinn A quatics P rogram
Pool Schedule 2026
Swim Classes, Schedules,
& Fees
33 Broadway, Jackson, CA
(209) 223-1646
www.ci.jackson.ca.us
[email protected]
Session 1: June 8-19 Mon-Fri
4-4:30PM 4:30-5PM
Non-swimmer 3 yrs Non-swimmer 4 yrs+
Junior Polywogs Junior Polywogs
Senior Polywogs Senior Polywogs
Beginner Advanced Beginner
5-5:30PM 5:30-6PM
Non-swimmer 3 yrs Non-swimmer 4 yrs+
Junior Polywogs Junior Polywogs
Senior Polywogs Senior Polywogs
Intermediate Swimmer
Session 2: June 22-July 3 Mon-Fri
11-11:30AM 11:30AM-12PM
Non-swimmer 3 yrs Non-swimmer 4 yrs
Junior Polywog Junior Polywog
Senior Polywog Senior Polywog
Beginner Advanced Beginner
Session 3: July 6-17 Mon-Fri
4-4:30PM 4:30-5PM
Non-swimmer 3 yrs Non-swimmer 4 yrs+
Junior Polywogs Junior Polywogs
Senior Polywogs Senior Polywogs
Beginner Advanced Beginner
5-5:30PM 5:30-6PM
Non-swimmer 3 yrs Non-swimmer 4 yrs+
Junior Polywogs Junior Polywogs
Senior Polywogs Senior Polywogs
Intermediate Swimmer
Session 4: July 20-24 Mon-Fri
(One-week Mini Session)
4-4:30PM 4:30-5PM
Non-swimmer 3 yrs Non-swimmer 4 yrs+
Junior Polywogs Junior Polywogs
Senior Polywogs Senior Polywogs
Beginners Advanced Beginner
5-5:30PM 5:30-6PM
Non-swimmer 3 yrs Non-swimmer 4 yrs+
Junior Polywogs Junior Polywogs
Senior Polywogs Senior Polywogs
Intermediate Swimmer
Private Lessons
Schedule (5+ yrs)
June 8-12th June 15-19th
10:30 -11:00AM 10:30 - 11:00AM
11:00 -11:30AM 11:00 - 11:30AM
11:30-12PM 11:30 -12PM
June 22-26 July 6-10th
4:00-4:30PM 10 -11:00AM
4:30-5Pm 11:00 -11:30AM
5:00-5:30PM 11:30-12PM
Junior Lifeguarding Summer Camp
Junior Lifeguarding is designed to guide 11–14-
year-old youth to the American Red Cross
Lifeguarding course by building a foundation of
knowledge, attitudes and skills for future
lifeguards. $270 per participant
2026 Special Events:

June 13th, June 27th, July 3rd, July 11th

Page 49 of 67 ends

2026 Pool Hours
Opening June 6th, 2026
Closing: August 9th, 2026

MONDAY-THURSDAY
9:30-10:30AM………Lap Swim
10:30AM-12PM………….Lessons
12-4PM…...Open Rec Swim
4-6PM………………Lessons
FRIDAY
10:30-12PM………….Lessons
12-4PM…...Open Rec Swim
4-6PM………………Lessons

SATURDAY-SUNDAY
11AM-12PM…….….…Lap Swim
12-5PM…….Open Rec Swim
Note: Handicapped Lift is available for
all recreational swim dates and times.

FEES

DAILY GATE ADMISSION
General: $6
Seniors: $5

SWIM LESSONS
Per 2 week sessions $70
Per 1 week session $40
1 week private lesson $85
Parents & Tots $50
Jr. Guarding Camp. $295
PASSES
Individual Season Passes $95
Family Season Passes (4) $175
+Add on per person $25

Parents & Tots Classes
July 27th to 31st, 2026
4:00PM - 4:30 PM; 4:30 - 5; 5PM - 5:30PM
*This class is designed to help children
mentally, physically, and socially, with
additional parental interaction. Also
includes basic water safety and comfort
building. Minimum age is 6 months.

COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

MINI SESSION
Short, fast paced course covering water
adjustment, floats, kicks, arm-strokes, &
stroke perfection.

NON-SWIMMER TOTS
3 YRS- 3-year-olds only, NO exceptions
4 YRS- 4-year-olds and UP
No previous lessons, or needing further
instruction (wading pool).

JUNIOR POLYWOG
5 to 6 yrs+, first lesson in the big pool. Must
be able to float with assistance and not
fear deeper water.

SENIOR POLYWOG
6 to 7 yrs+, must be able to float
independently and beginning front crawl.

BEGINNER
8 yrs+, must be able to float, beginning
crawl stroke, & combined stroke on back.

Class taught in 9 feet of water.

ADVANCED BEGINNER
Must be able to front crawl for 20 yards
and move on back for 10 yards.

INTERMEDIATE
Must be able to front crawl with breathing
for 25 yards, elementary breaststroke for
25 yards, and do the standing dive.

SWIMMER
Must be able to front crawl for 100 yards,
elementary backstroke for 50 yards,
breaststroke or sidestroke, and tread
water for one minute.

PRIVATE LESSON
30-minute sessions of individual instruction,
one student per instructor

Page 50 of 67 ends

Resolution No. 2026-08
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jackson Establishing Fees & Program Schedule
for the 2026 Swim Program
WHEREAS, the City of Jackson operates a pool for the recreational enjoyment of the community; and
WHEREAS, the pool generates fees to pay for a portion of the cost of its operation; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed revisions to subject fees and determined said fees to be reasonable:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Jackson does hereby approve the following fee schedule and program schedule (EXHIBIT A) for the 2026 Swim Program:

Fee Classification Fee Schedule
Daily Gate Admission
General $6.00
Seniors (55 yrs. +) $5.00
Swim Lessons
Per two-week session $70.00
Per one-week session $40.00
Private Lesson (one-week) $85.00
Parents & Tots $50.00
Passes
Individual Season Pass $95.00
Family Season Pass (4 People) $175.00
Add On (Per Person) $25.00
Pre-Season Pool Parties
Use Fee $100
Lifeguard Charges: 1-20 swimmers $25/hour
21-50 swimmers $50/hour
Deposit (refundable) $150
Certifications/Training
Lifeguard Certification $240
Lifeguard Recertification $190
Junior Lifeguard Training $270

Page 51 of 67 ends

Special Events
Floating Under the Fireworks $30.00/ticket
Theme Nights $10.00/ticket
The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Jackson at a regular meeting on the 23rd of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF JACKSON

Chad Simmons, Mayor
ATTEST:

John Georgette, City Clerk

Page 52 of 67 ends

City of Jackson
Council Meeting Memorandum
Monday, March 23, 2026 - 6:30 PM Regular Meeting
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Carl P. Simpson, City Manager
Date submitted: March 20, 2026
Agenda Item #6d: Resolution 2026-09 Approving the Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2024/25
Recommendation:

That the City Council review and Approve Resolution 2026-09 Approving the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program Annual Report.

Summary and Discussion:

ACTC presents the attached Annual Report for the Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program (RTMF) for Fiscal Year 2024/25. The following attachments are included in the report:
• FY 24/25 revenue by jurisdiction
• Program expenditures by project
• Current-adopted fee schedule
• Eligible Project Listing
• RTMF Reporting Form
Resolution 2026-09 is for the Approval of the FY 2024/25 RTMF Program Annual Report. The report is attached for City Council review and consideration. The Annual Report details the expenditure of funds in accordance with the MOU.

Upon review of the report, Council is expected to adopt Resolution 2026-09.

Enclosures:

Resolution No. 2026-09
Annual Status Report for Fiscal Year 2024/25

Page 53 of 67 ends

Page 54 of 67 ends

Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program
Fiscal Year 2024-25 - Annual Report
Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program
Annual Status Report for Fiscal Year 2024/25
The purpose of this Annual Report is to document Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee (RTMF) program history, describe project obligations, identify approved expenditures, account for new revenues, and describe new program modifications.

RTMF PROGRAM HISTORY
In 2006, the County of Amador and all five (5) incorporated cities adopted a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Amador County Transportation Commission (ACTC) to establish the RTMF program to collect fees on new building construction within Amador County for the purpose of mitigating traffic impacts on the regional roadway system. By statute, these fees can only be spent on a specified list of projects subject to a Nexus Plan that describes the relationship between the 'project' and its 'impact'.

Pursuant to the original 2006 RTMF program agreement, fees collected by the cities and the County were set at a rate of $283.20 per trip end. In Fiscal Year (FY) 07/08, the cities and County increased the fee ( due to inflation) to $304.00 per trip end. In FY 14/15, the fee schedule was modified again, increasing the Residential trip rate to $388/trip end and reducing specific high-volume Commercial trip rates to $167/trip end. The updated MOU, Fee Schedule (Attachment D), and Capital Improvement Program (Attachment C) was approved in FY 15/16 by the County and all five (5) member cities.

Since its inception, the RTMF program has helped to fund construction of seven (7) regionally significant transportation projects, shown below:

1. SR 88/104 (Martell - County)

2. Mission Boulevard (City of Jackson)

3. Court Street/SR 88 (City of Jackson)

4. SR 49/Main Street (City of Jackson)

5. Sutter-Ione Road (City of Sutter Creek)

6. SR 104/Prospect Drive-Bowers Drive (Sutter Creek)

7. SR 49/Main Street Roundabout (City of Plymouth)
In addition, the Program has obligated contributions toward the following projects currently in the planning or project development phase:

8. Sutter Street Extension/SR 49-88 (City of Jackson)

9. Western Ione Roadway Improvement Strategy (WIRIS)- (City oflone)

10. Argonaut Lane/SR 49-88 (Martell - County)

11. Wicklow Way Extension
The RTMF Oversight Committee (OC) is comprised of one (1) appointed representative from each City and the County. The ACTC also appoints a representative. The OC meets annually to review the prior FY Annual Report, and provide recommendations for any funding, project, or other program adjustments to be considered for adoption by member agencies. In 2014/15, the cities and County agreed to modify the original MOU to state that the ACTC member would be a representative of the County.

Page 55 of 67 ends

Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program
Fiscal Year 2024-25 - Annual Report
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU} MODIFICATION
At its May 3, 2018 meeting, the RTMF QC recommended that the RTMF MOU be modified to designate the agreement as "binding" among participant jurisdictions. This action was taken in response to:
1) The City of Ione agreement with a developer resulting in the deferral/loss of $504,000 to the RTMF program.
2) The lack of a formal mechanism to reimburse the RTMF program for costs related to the Bowers Dr/Prospect Dr project in the City of Sutter Creek.

The QC committee intention with the action was to 'bind' member jurisdictions to requirements, stated in the MOU under Exhibit D "Administrative Policies and Procedures", that any recommendations for deferrals, reimbursements, and/or adjustments to RTMF fees be brought before the RTMF OC for review and approval.

RTMF FY 2024/25 PROGRAM ACTION
Three (3) QC meetings were held during FY 2024/25. Two (2) of which discussed annual program funding and potential projects, paving equipment for roadway rehabilitation projects in Amador County, and the 2024 'Nexus' & 'Proportionality' Study update. ACTC hired DKS consulting firm to complete the Study to align with the recently updated 2024 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

Another meeting held on February 18th was specifically related to the Gold Rush Ranch Development (Sutter Creek Ranch Development), where representatives discussed potential repayment of the costs associated with the Bowers/Prospect Dr. project with no resolution to date. No new funding actions or amendments to RTMF policies were approved during FY 2024/25.

ANNUAL FEES
As required by the MOU, each city and the County submits RTMF revenues to ACTC for deposit into an account solely designated for the RTMF program. In FY 24/25, the RTMF program received revenue from member jurisdictions (including interest earnings of $111,040) totaling $320,636. Those FY 24/25 contributions are shown below:
• Amador County = $ 128,996
• Ione = $ 73,682
• Jackson = $0
• Sutter Creek = $3,87 8
• Plymouth = $0
• Amador City = $3,040
• Interest (County/RTMF) = $4,511/106,528
0 Total = $320,636
On Attachment A these contributions from member jurisdictions bring fund revenue since program inception to total $11,946,250 Attachment B lists RTMF project revenue, approved expenditures, current obligations, and project status. (The projects shown as "Completed" were constructed with final expenditures recorded prior to FY 14/15.)
The following summary outlines the current status of RTMF-funded projects, current funding obligations, and actions of the RTMF OC through FY 24/25:

Page 56 of 67 ends

Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program
Fiscal Year 2024-25 -Annual Report
SR 104 - Prospect Drive/Bowers Drive Intersection/Realignment The RTMF OC approved this project with the condition that the Gold Rush Ranch development project would repay the RTMF program for the entire cost of the project -$1,482,127.

Conditions of Approval for the Gold Rush Ranch development project (City of Sutter Creek) required Gold Rush Ranch to repay the RTMF program for the total cost incurred for the SR 104 - Prospect Drive/Bowers Drive Intersection/Realignment project and to complete additional lane(s) and signalization before the first Gold Rush building permit could be approved. These Conditions mitigated impacts generated by additional traffic from the Gold Rush development pursuant to the Gold Rush Ranch EIR and project approval documents.

The Gold Rush Ranch Tentative Map is now expired. ACTC is in discussions with Sutter Creek representatives to consider appropriate mechanisms for repayment of Prospect Drive/Bowers Drive project costs.

SR 49/Main Street, Plymouth
The RTMF OC recommended $200,000 to be programmed as a local match for the City of Plymouth's SR 49/Main Street intersection project. This expenditure has been recorded. The Project was constructed at a cost of $3.8 million.

Sutter Street Extension, Jackson
In past years, the RTMF OC obligated $1,300,000 to the Sutter Street Extension project. In 2006, the City of Jackson spent $387,586 acquiring a key piece of ROW leaving an obligated balance of $912,414. In FY 08/09, the OC authorized the City of Jackson to initiate project development efforts utilizing the $912,414 programmed balance.

Remediation efforts by the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Toxic Substances Control to retrofit the dam at the existing terminus of Sutter Street temporarily suspended project development efforts. In 2015, EPA approved a Phase 2 Removal Action. With the subsequent confirmation of satisfactory restoration of residential properties, EPA cleared the way for development efforts on the Sutter Street Extension project to recommence in 2019.

During this time period, a total of $175,120 was expended leaving a balance of $737,294 available for future project development efforts. In the past four (4) fiscal years, the City has expended an additional $631,836 on continued planning and project development work. A balance of $105,458 was left as of June 30, 2024.

Western Ione Roadway Improvement System (WIRIS)
The WIRIS project, identified as mitigation in the Ione General Plan and cited in prior development approvals, received an initial obligation of$618,975 from the RTMF program. In FY 09/10, at a cost of $124,187, Dokken Engineering completed a Project Study Report (PSR) selecting a preferred alignment and funding strategy. At that time, the PSR estimated the total cost for the WIRIS to be $113 .4 million.

In FY 09/10, given reduced expectations for funding at the Federal, State, and Local level, the OC recommended continued funding for development of the WIRIS project at a cost not to

Page 57 of 67 ends

Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program
Fiscal Year 2024-25 - Annual Report
exceed $177,000. After work to revise the PSR work was undertaken, that effort was suspended after incurring an additional $45,279 in expenditures.

During FY 14/15, the City again revised its planning effort to focus on a down-scaled WIRIS project - OC authorized $131,721 for continued work on the WIRIS project. This effort was to focus on improvements to existing roadway alignments for use as a bypass alternative. In FY 16/17, the City oflone requested an additional $80,000 in RTMF funding to prepare the updated WIRIS Project Report. The WIRIS Project Report was completed in FY 17 /18 and the City was reimbursed in the amount of $211,225.

Project alternatives developed by the Report were presented to the Ione Planning Commission and may be presented to the Ione City County for its consideration of formal adoption of a preferred, alternative alignment. The OC agreed not to provide additional RTMF funding until the Ione City Council takes further action on the Project.

Argonaut Lane-SR 49/88 Intersection
In FY 07/08, citing Right of Way and Project Cost constraints, the OC recommended the project development process be suspended.

Wicklow Way Extension
In FY 15/16, the RTMF OC agreed to loan up to 50% of funding from the Sutter Street Extension project to begin preliminary engineering for the Wicklow Way Extension project.

County staff estimated a cost of $284,500 to prepare a Project Study Report ( conduct environmental assessments and initiate preliminary engineering and design) for the Wicklow Way Extension project. To date, the study has not been initiated and $284,500 remains obligated to the project.

The $284,500 loan was repaid to the Sutter Street Extension project utilizing subsequent, annual contributions to the RTMF program.

SR 88 / Pine Grove Improvements
During FY 17/18, the RTMF OC authorized programming $1,000,000 in RTMF funding to be commitment to Construction costs for the Pine Grove Improvements project. This funding amount had been previously approved through adoption of the 2015 Amador County Regional Transportation Plan as shown on the attached RTP Tier I/ RTMF Project list. In June 2024 the RTMF OC de-obligated $826,000 in RTMF funding to be swapped with an equivalent amount of Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality funding apportionments. A total of$174,000 in RTMF funds remain programmed to the Construction Phase. In FY 24/25, Amador County advertised and awarded the construction contract to George Reed with the anticipation that construction will be being in early 2026.

Page 58 of 67 ends

Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program
Fiscal Year 2024-25 - Annual Report
FY 24/25 RTMF Fund Balance
During FY 24/25, the RTMF program received additional revenue from its member jurisdictions totaling $209,596 along with $111,040 in interest totaling $320,636 (Attachment A) in new revenue.

Attachment B shows total remaining unprogramrned fund balance after accounting for current funding obligations. As of June 30, 2025, $4,794,896 is available for programming to eligible RTMF projects.

Attachment C lists current funding commitments toward projects on the RTMF Capital Improvement Program (CIP). (As approved through its adopted Nexus Study) Recently ACTC worked with consultant support to update the Nexus Study to align with the CIP list in the newly adopted 2024 Amador County Regional Transportation Plan and the new policies within the RTP to focus primarily on the rehabilitation and reconstruction of local streets and roadways in the County.

Attachment D shows the currently-adopted Fee Schedule.

Attachment E is a RTMF reporting sheet for the jurisdictions to provide the detailed information pertaining to the fees received.

Attachment F is the annual draft resolution for the jurisdictions use.

Page 59 of 67 ends

Page 60 of 67 ends

Page 61 of 67 ends

Ran•
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 6
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 Table 5. 2024 Amador County Regional Transportation Plan - Amendment Approved 11106/25 Regional and State Highway Project Listing Tiers
Location
County
County
County
County
County
Jewon
Jecl<son
Jacl<son
County-BO
County-9
County-9
County-52
County-52
County-81
Sutter Creek
Sutter Creek
Plymouth
lone
Sutter Creek
County-74
County-60
County-81
County-74
County-22
rvu,urr t...reeK
*
County-22
County-JO
County-22
County-22
Su1ler Craek
County-SO
1•·wu■uor .......

County-9
County-55
County-256
County-20
County-41 *
County-41 •
Co<Jnty-9
County-9
County-9
Project Location
SR 88/Pine Grove Corridor Improvement Project
Fiddletown Road Bridge
Old Amado, Road Bridge
eaa Raod Bridge
C&lbondale Road Bridge
French Bar Road Bridge
South Avenue Bridge
HSIP Lighting Project
Buena Vista Road (from County Line to Camanche
Pa-., Northl
Shake Ridge Road (from Pondarosa Way to Cad Clara
Wm
Shake Ridge Road (from Cad Clara Way to Fiddletown
Road)
Fiddletown Road (from PM 6.2 to Hale Road)
. -
--
.• � � •. :--:.· ;-ir-�:.��
Fiddlet...,.. (from Hale Rd. to Brockman Mill Rd.)
Buena Vista Rd. (PM 5.0 to Stony Cnlek)
Church St (Main St. to city limlts) 113 priority of city Su1ler Hill Rd. (Main St. to Eureka Rd.�1 priority of city Old Sacramento Rd. (City 6mits to Latrobe Rd.)
S.Sacramanto St, W. Marlette, S. MRls, W. Main st
(Junior High School access Rds.)
Spanish St. (Kayes St. to N. Ame6a St.) 12 priority of city Michigan Bar Rd. (county line to Carbondale Rd.)
Buena VIS ta Rd. (SR 88 to SR 104)
Buena Vista Rd. (Slony Craak to Camanche Parltway ....... , Michigan Bar Rd. (Carbondale Rd. to SR 104)
Ridge Road (from Running Gold Road lo City Umits)
Old SR 49/Maln St.-SR 49 to Church St.

Ridge Road (from Ridge Voew Drive to Ridge Frontage
D••�Ml••I\I
Argonaut Lane
Ridge Road (from Ridge Frontage Road (West) to
Running Gold Road)
Ridge Road (fro,n Climu Road to Ridge VifNI Drive)
Main Street/Hanford Street.field to no<1h city 6mlt1
111uena vrsta 1101d (from Stony Cn,ok Road to waters
R••'"''
Main Street Paving
Shake Ridge Road (from Buckeye Drive to Bottimora
Courtl
Shenandoah Road (Plymouth City Limits to PM 0. 75)
Camanche Parkway North (from LakevltNI Drive (wast) to
'l",-nAno,i\
Jackson Gate Road
Old Highway 49 (1rom Su1lar Creek City Limlts to Amaaor 1,.. ... , ... :.. 11-..,£!:,t.

Old Highway 49 (from Amador city City Umlts (W) to
IMWV•Q\
Shake Nidge Noad (from Onato Road (east) to Quartz
'1.--. ... ,-:.. a ... _ .. t:asn
Shake Ridge Road (from Quartz Mountain Road East to
,��--·-'
Shake Ridge Road (from Ponderosa Annex to Buckeye
Drive)
2024Co■t
Description Estimate
Tim• Frame1 (1,000■)
Previously Programmed Pro/ects
Safety """'°vements (+3 year) $8.300
Bridge n,placement (+Jyear) $2.480
Bridge replacement (+3year) $2.126
Bridge n,placement (+3 year) $1.908
Bridge n,placement (+Jyear) $3.758
Bridge n,placement (1 year) $4.625
Bridge replacement (+3 year) $3.093
SR 88/49 Corridor (+3 year) $0.199
Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (+Jyear) $1.117 overt.av Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (+Jyaar) $0.838 overlav Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (+3 year) $0.690 overtav Reconstruction (+3 year) $0.646
I\. �-�lfrol«b(Funded) ., ,'
Reconstruction (+3 years) $3.164
Reconatniction (+3 years) $1.723
Asphalt Concrete Ovo�ay (+3 years) $0.641
Asphalt Concrete Ove�ay (+3 years) $0.610
Asphalt Concrete Overlay (+Jyaars) $1.698
Asphalt Concrete Overlay (+3 years) S0.665
Asphalt Concrete Ove�ay (+3 years) S0.534
Microsurfacing (+Jyaars) S0.606
Minor pavement repairs, curverts, mil and (+3 years) $0.914 nu•rtReconstruction (+3 years) S1.177
Microsurfacing (+3 years) $0.706
Minor pavement repairs, culverts, rriD and (+ 5year) $0.742 over1 ....

Asphalt concrete ova�ay (+ 5 year) $3.000
Minor pavement repairs, culveri■, mill and (+ 5yaar) $0.792 av ... - Minor pavement repairs, adverts, mill and (+ 5yaar) $0.174 ··-�-
Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (+ 5 year) $0.605 overlay Minor pavement repairs, culYerts, mH and
- (+ 5 year) $0.638 -�-
Asphalt concrete overlay (+ 5yaar) $2.500
Minor pavement repairs, cuiverts, mil and (+10 year) $0.935 ove.t ... pavement n,hab., signing, and striping (+10 year) $1.077 Minor paveme,rrepairs, culverts, mill and
ovenau (+15year) $0.588
Minor paveme,jrepa1rs, culYerts, miU and
ov..t- (+15year) $0.413
Minor pavement repairs, culverts. mill and (+15year) $0.671 ........

Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (+15yaar) $0,523 ~ .....

Minor pavement repairs, culverts, miR and
~ ....... (+15yaar) S0.479
Minor pavement repairs, adverts, mia and (+15 year) $0.330 v .... u Minor pavement repairs, cutverts, min and (+15year) $0,748 _..,_ Minor pavement repairs, culverts, rml and (+15year) $0.682 -.. -�-.

Minor pavement repairs, culverts, miD and (+15yaar) $0.825 overlay RIP
X
X
X
X
X
"
$1.723
$1.698
$0.608
$0.914
S1.177
$0.706
$0.742
S0.792
S0.174
$0.605
$0.638
$0.935
S0.566
$0.413
$0.671
Revenue(1,000s)

LTF RSTP
X
,i.:_s � b.�
$3.164
S0.641
$0.305

0.332
$0.534
$3.000
$2.500
$1.077
$0.523
$0.479
$0.330
$0.748
$0.682
$0.825
a:.a1••
Tax
RTMF Muaure
X
;,;:.: " ..
. •·
$0.305
$0.305
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
-
-
I
.. I
-
..
-
..
-
..
-
• Redavad relinquishment funding for this section, must convnit "other source" section amount to receive fund(n�see 914125 minutes ... TBD by RTMF OC ... TBD by Caltrans Source
(HBP,
HSIP,

RIP,STP,CM

AQ,RSTP
HBP
HBP
HBP
HBP
HBP
HBP
HSIP
.
··•-
Clty-$1
MIi
City•
$SOOK
County•
SIOOK

Page 62 of 67 ends

30 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from ,emridge Road to Wondering Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mil and (+15year) S0.677 -- J�---· lny-•-•
31 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from Wondering Hill Drive to SR 88) Minor pavement repairs, culverts. mill and (+15year) S0.754 - -··-·-·
32 County-258 Comanche Parl<way North (from Curran Road lo Coal Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mU and (+15 year) S1.018 - IUjn111,D ...... ..n v-•-··
33 County-55 Shenandoah Road (from PM 8.0 to El Dorado County Lin• Minor pavement repairs, culverts, miU and (15-20 year) S0.594 lt'loy9rlau 34 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from City Um�• to Pine Gulch Road) Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (15-20year) $0.401 - '-··-·-
35 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from Fiddlet...., Road lo Wagon Minor pavement repairs, adverts, miU and (15-20 year) - lAJI.•·• n-. .... , o··-•- $0.776
36 County-258 Camanche Parkway NOf1h (from Coal Mine Road to Mino, pavement repairs, culverts, rrill and (15-20 year) S1.51l - Ruena Vi••A Roa"' ov-•-·
37 County-55 Shenandoah Road (from OatNm Road to PM 8.0) Minor pavement repairs, culverts, niU and (15-20year) S0.776 - '-··-·-·
38 County-52 FiddletO"M> Road (from PM 3.0 to Quartz Mountain Road Minor pavement repairs, cutverts, mill and (15-20 year) 11.034 - North) overlay
39 County-52 Fiddlat...., Road (from Brockman Mill Road to Ponderosa Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (15-20 year) S0.709 - Drive) overlay 40 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from Pine Gulch Road to Onelo Road Minor pavement repairs, culverts, niJI and (15-20year) $0,924 - (out)) overlay
41 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from Stage Drive to Ponderosa Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mll and (15-20 year) S1.028 - Annex) overlay
42 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from Bottimore Court to Ponderosa Minor pavement repairs, culverts, mill and (15-20 year) S0.924 - Wrt) overlay
43 County-9 Shake Ridge Road (from Wagon Wheel Drive to Minor pavement repairs, culverts, miP and (15-20 year) $0.99E - Femridge Road) overlay
44 County-1 New Yortc Rench Road Corridor: (from C� Limits to PM Minor pavement repairs, culverts, ml and (15-20yoo,) S0.825 -

1.5) overlay
$41.085 $12,362 $4,806 $10,333 $15.000 S0.000 S0.000
TIER I TOTAL: $42.601 12 mil 5 mil 10mil 15 mil
• Recieved relinquishment funding for this section, must convnit •other source· section amount to receive funding-tee 9J4/25 minutes - TSO by RTMF OC - TSO by Caltrans

Page 63 of 67 ends

Attachment D
Countywide Regional Traffic Mitigation Fees (adopted) 2016/17 Development Project Type Adjusted Fee Amount
Residential Trip Rate Residential
$388/trip end
Residential Single Family Detached (Note: D.U. = Dwelling Unit) 10.0/D.U. $3,880/D.U.

Multi-Family Attached 7.1/D.U. $2,755/D.U.

Apartments, duplexes or condominiums are charged per dwelling unit without regard to square footage or number of bedrooms.

Mobile Home Park or Subdivision 4.22/D.U. $1,637/D.U.

An area or tract of land where more than two spaces are rented or individually owned to accommodate mobile homes.

Retirement Community
Five or more residential units. enforceably restricted to those 55 or over and designed for the elderly.

Congregate Care Facility 2.15/D.U. $834/D.U.

Congregate care facilities typically consist of one or more multi-unit buildings designed for elderly living; they may also contain common dining rooms, medical facilities and recreational facilities.

Non- Development Project Type Adjusted Commercial:

Residential Trip Rate $167/Trip End
Retail High Volume Retail: 20/1,000 S.F. $3,340/1,000 S.F.

Commercial Drug Store Department Store Grocery Store (Note: Square Discount Store Mini Mart Automobile Sales Liquor Store Supermarket Laundromat Feet of the
Auto Parts Clothing/ Apparel Store Delicatessen gross floor Bank Health Fitness Center Record/Video Rental & Sales area, Hardware Store Pharmacy measured to
the nearest
Specialty Retail Center square foot:

Small shopping centers that contain a variety of retail shops including apparel; applicable to hard goods; and services such as real estate offices, dance studios, florists, and structures small restaurants only.)
Shopping Center
May contain Supermarkets, Drug Stores, Banks, Movie Theater and miscellaneous small retail shoos.

Medium Volume Retail: 13/1,000 S.F. $2,171/1,000 S.F.

Bakery Automobile Repair Child Care
Club Store Dry Cleaner Shoe Store
Gift Shop Lumber/Building Supplies Sporting Goods Store Nursery Jewelry Store Stationary Store
Photo Store Print Shop (retail) Toy Store
Electronics Store Book Store Factory Outlet Center
Tire Store Health Food Store
Low Volume Retail: 1.5/1.000 S.F. $251/1,000 S.F.

Antique Store Boat/Equipment Repair Shop
Appliance Store Furniture Store
Gallery Museum
Kennel Boat/RV/Mobile Home Sales
Clock Store Repair Shop (TV. Radio, Vacuum, etc.)
Wine or beer tasting rooms or oroduct retail sales in coniunction with such Food Fast food standalone restaurant on a State highway 161/1.000 $26.887/1,000 S.F.

Services S.F.

Fast food drive-through restaurant within a shopping center or community (wherein 60/1,000 S.F. $10,020/1,000 S.F. fast food restaurant is not immediately adjacent to a State highway) Quality Sit-down Restaurant 23/1,000 S.F. $3,841/1000 S.F.

Drinking Establishment (Bar)

Page 64 of 67 ends

Specialty Gas Station with or without convenience store (Note: The number of fueling spaces is 32/Fueling $5,344/Fueling Commercial determined by the maximum number of vehicles capable of being fueled Space Space simultaneously.)
Car Wash/ Quick Lube 21/Stall $3,507/Stall
Hotel/Motel/Resort/Bed and Breakfast (Note: Sleeping unit, dwelling unit. rental unit. 5.2/Unit $868/Unit or other component by which the development is marketed.) Medical Hospital 11.8/Bed $1,971/Bed
Nursing Home / Convalescent Home 2.6/Bed $434/Bed
Medical Office or Medical or Health Clinic providing diagnostic or treatment services 30/1,000 S.F. $5.010/1,000 S.F.

Non- Development Project Type Adjusted All Other NonResidential Trip Rate1 Residential:

Category $304/trip end
Office General Office I l/1,000 S.F. $3,344/1,000 S.F.

Industrial Light. including: 6/1,000 S.F. $1,824/1.000 S.F.

Airport/Airstrip Meat Packing Facility
Livestock Feedlot/Auction Yard Printing Plant
Material Testing Laboratory Electronics Plant
Heavy, including: 1.5/1,000 S.F. $456/1.000 S.F.

Auto Wrecking and Junk Yard Mining Operation
Foundry and Smelter Refining Plant
Lumber Mill
Manufacturing/ Assembly/ Agricultural Processing 3/1,000 S.F. $912/1,000 S.F.

Manufacturing or assembly facilities where the primary activity is the conversion of raw materials, products or parts into finished commodities for sale or distribution, including a winery or brewery.

Institutional Elementary School / Middle School I 0/1,000 S.F. $3,040/1,000 S.F.

Church or other place of worship
High School I 3/1,000 S.F. $3,952/1,000 S.F.

Public Utilities (Publicly or privately owned) 6/1,000 S.F. $1.824/1,000 S.F.

Utilities Production, generation, storage, transmission and treatment facilities, mechanical or industrial space, parts and equipment storage. repair areas, and office space in the same project and related to or used for these utility uses.

Warehousing/ Warehouse 5/1,000 S.F. $ I ,520/1.000 S.F.

Storage Facilities primarily devoted to the storage of materials, including wholesale distribution facilities.

Mini-storage Facilities 2/1,000 S.F. $608/1,000 S.F.

Buildings housing separate storage units or vaults used for storage.

Other Golf Course 21/Hole $6,384/Hole
Theater (Movie) 6.4/1,000 S.F. $1.946/1,000 S.F.

Theater (Live) 1.5/1,000 S.F. $456/1,000 S.F.

Recreational/ Visitor Center ). I/Parking $942/Parking
Space Space

Page 65 of 67 ends

Resolution No. 2026-09
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jackson Approving the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Amador County Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program Annual Report
WHEREAS, pursuant to its authority under Government Code 66000 et. seq., the City of Jackson previously imposed regional traffic mitigation fees and amended said fees pursuant to Resolution Nos. 2005-24, 2006-03, 2009-14, 2010-23, 2010-24, and 2011-05; and WHEREAS, the purpose of said fees is to mitigate the impact of new developments on the regional transportation system of Amador County; and WHEREAS, The County of Amador and the County’s five incorporated cities have all collected and deposited all regional traffic mitigation fees with the Amador County Transportation Commission (“ACTC”) which has maintained the funds in a separate non comingled capital facilities fund (“capital facilities fund”) established for the above stated purpose pursuant to Government Code Section 66006(a) and (b); and WHEREAS, the ACTC and the City of Jackson have made available to the public an annual program implementation report for fiscal year 2024/25 (“Annual Report”) which is hereby incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Annual Report was prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 66001(d) and 66006(b)(1); and
WHEREAS, the City of Jackson has reviewed the information provided in the Annual Report and determined the information contained therein is true and correct; and WHEREAS, the Annual Report reflects implementation of prior year recommendations of the Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Oversight Committee as approved by the cities and County for programming and expending funds for projects consistent with the Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) establishing the countywide Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Program and the Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee Nexus Plan 2000-2025 (“Nexus Plan”); and
WHEREAS, City of Jackson has agendized and considered the Annual Report at a regularly scheduled City Council meeting and considered public comment concerning the Annual Report during said meeting.

NOW THEREFORE, the City of Jackson, County of Amador, State of California, finds and determines the following:

1. The above recitals are true and represent findings of the City Council.

2. The City Council hereby approves the Annual Report for fiscal year 2024/25 as presented.

Page 66 of 67 ends

3. That all recommendations for funding are consistent with the MOU and the Nexus Plan as required.

4. The approval of the Annual Report and programming and expenditure of funds consistent with the previously approved MOU and Nexus Plan is not a “project” or otherwise an act requiring environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.

5. That all Regional Traffic Mitigation Fees previously collected and not yet expended are accounted for and are still needed for the purposes for which they were collected.

The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Jackson at a regular meeting on the 23rd day of March, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CITY OF JACKSON

Chad Simmons, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
John Georgette, City Clerk

Page 67 of 67 ends

Jackson City CouncilMarch 23, 2026

Jackson City Council
March 23, 2026