Jurupa Valley City Council
May 19, 2022

Page - 1 -

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, May 19, 2022
Council Workshop: 5:30 p.m.

Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

1. 5:30 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR COUNCIL WORKSHOP ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Leslie Altamirano, Mayor Pro Tem
● Lorena Barajas Bisbee, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member

2. FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET WORKSHOP
A. DISCUSSION OF FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 ANNUAL CITY BUDGET A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.

B. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.

C. If the Meeting is conducted via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e), the public may submit comments to the City Council via email or via telephone prior to the Mayor calling the item. Email comment shall be sent to:

[email protected]. Telephone comments may be made by calling (951) 332- 6464, Ext. 140. Email and telephone comments are subject to the same rules as in-person comments.

D. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

E. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.

Page - 2 -

Requested Action: That the City Council review the Proposed FY 202 2-23 City Budget and direct staff to make changes as necessary prior to final adoption at a subsequent meeting scheduled on June 16, 2022.

3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Leslie Altamirano, Mayor Pro Tem
● Lorena Barajas Bisbee, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member

4. INVOCATION

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

7. PRESENTATIONS

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN COMMUNITY ENERGY JOINT

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TECHNICAL
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF MAY 11, 2022

Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and ad dress for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 5495 4.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.

Page - 3 -

2. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF

GOVERNMENTS ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COMMITTEE
MEETING OF MAY 11, 2022

B. COUNCIL MEMBER LORENA BARAJAS BISBEE

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTER N RIVERSIDE COUNTY R EGIONAL
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF MAY 2, 2022

2. UPDATE ON THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND BUSINESS
MEETING OF MAY 5, 2022

C. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. UPDATE ON THE RIV ERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ORTATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 11, 2022

2. UPDATE ON THE NORT HWEST NOW COALITION MEETING
OF MAY 12, 2022

3. UPDATE ON THE METR OLINK / SOUTHERN CAL IFORNIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY – AUDIT A ND FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF MAY 13, 2022

D. COUNCIL MEMBER GUILLERMO SILVA

1. UPDATE ON THE NORTHW EST MOSQUITO AND VEC TOR
CONTROL DISTRICT MEETING OF MAY 19, 2022

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

A. COUNCIL TRAVEL SUMMARY REPORT

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. MAY 5, 2022 REGULAR MEETING

13. CONSENT CALENDAR (COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA TAKEN HERE) (All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved in one motion unless a Councilmember requests a separate action on a specific item on the Consent Calendar. If an item is removed from the Consent Calendar, it will be discussed individually and acted upon separately.)

A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN

THE AGENDA

Page - 4 -

Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.

B. REAFFIRM FINDINGS AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO MEET IN

WHOLE OR IN PART BY TELECONFERENCING UNDER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DURING THE COVID -19

STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCY

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -40, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE

CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH A TELECONFERENCE OPTION

FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC DUE TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY AND THE CITY
COUNCIL’S DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e), AND MAKING FINDINGS

AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME

C. AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY AND KEVIN RYAN FOR AMERICAN RESCUE

PLAN ACT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

Requested Action: That the City Council approve an agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Kevin Ryan for American Rescue Plan Act administrative consulting services and authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment in substantially the form and format a ttached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

D. CONSIDERATION OF RES OLUTIONS REGARDING T HE ANNUAL

ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LA NDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1 CONSOLIDATED (JV L&LMD NO. 89-1-C) - CITYWIDE

1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -41, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y,
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT

REGARDING PROPOSED A SSESSMENTS TO BE LEV IED AND
COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21 , 34, 61, 73, 78, 95 , 102, 106, 126, 128 , 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, T, U, X, AND Z; AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2 -B, 2 -C, 2 -D, 2 -E, AND 2 -F OF CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANC E

Page - 5 -

DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972

2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-42, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

DECLARING ITS INTENT ION TO LEVY AND COLL ECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, D, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, T, U, X, AND Z; AND STREET LIGHTI NG ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2 -E, AND 2 -F OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTI NG MAINTENANCE DISTR ICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE MAI NTENANCE AND

SERVICING OF LANDSCA PING, MULTI -PURPOSE TRAILS,

FENCING, FOSSIL FILT ERS, BIO -SWALES, GRA FFITI

ABATEMENT, TRAFFIC S IGNALS, BRIDGE LIGHT S, AND
STREET LIGHTS FOR FI SCAL YEAR 2022 -23; A ND GIVING

NOTICE OF AND SETTIN G THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE

PUBLIC HEARING ON THE AN NUAL ASSESSMENT AND

ORDERING NOTICE OF T HE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE

PUBLISHED

E. RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE EE (TROY

COURT INDUSTRIAL) TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD 89-1-C”), ON THE WEST SIDE OF TROY COURT

1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -43, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY , INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE EE AND THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS
OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS

AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-44, entitled:

Page - 6 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY , APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE

ENGINEER REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF

TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE EE AND THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-45, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY , DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX

TERRITORY TO CITY O F JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE EE AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT

ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR
2022-2023 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF
DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS A ND HIGHWAYS

CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA

CONSTITUTION AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR

HEARING PROTESTS

F. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, INC. FOR THE MISSION BOULEVARD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION – PHASE II, CIP #21103, FROM BELLEGRAVE AVENUE TO PYRITE STREET IN THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve and award a construction agreement to All American Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of $1,681,476.50 for the Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase II, CIP #21103 from Bellegrave to Pyrite (“Agreement”), for the work included in its bid proposal and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney; and

2. Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $168,147.65 and authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed the total contract amount, pursuant to requirements set forth in the Agreement; and

3. Re-appropriate $89,000.00 of Gas Tax funds for the City’s On Call Pavement Repair Services, Account No. 54153, to the Project account; and

4. Re-appropriate $116,000.00 of Gas Tax funds from the City’s On Call Striping, Account No. 54151, to the Project account; and

Page - 7 -

5. Authorize the City Manager to record the Notice of Completion upon acceptance of the work by the City Engineer.

14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER (1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 3.75 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THE

METHOD USED FOR CALCULATING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FOR RETAIL/SERVICE/OFFICE, BUSINESS PARK, INDUSTRIAL, AND

RESIDENTIAL USES AND COMMERCIAL LODGING AND MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENTS, AND (2) A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS,

AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA
(CONTINUED FROM THE MAY 5, 2022 MEETING)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing and consider any public testimony;

2. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2022-08, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
AMENDING CHAPTER 3.75 (DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE) OF

THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THAT

THE METHOD FOR CAL CULATING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

FEES FOR RETAIL/SERVICE/OFFICE, BUSINESS PARK, AND

INDUSTRIAL USES SHALL BE BASED ON THE SQUARE

FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING, AND TO CLARIFY THAT FEES

FOR RESIDENTIAL USES AND COMMERCIAL LODGING ARE

CALCULATED BASED ON A PER UNIT BAS IS AND THAT FEES

FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS ARE BASED ON THE

COMBINATION OF THE LAND USES, MAKING CONFORMING
REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 3.75, AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) AND 15273(A)(4) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT;

3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-34, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, ADOPT ING A DEVELOPMENT IM PACT

FEE FOR ACCESSORY DW ELLING UNITS, AND MA KING A
FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) AND
15273(A)(4) OF THE C ALIFORNIA ENVIRONMEN TAL

QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
Page - 8 -

16. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. STUDY SESSION: MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 22080 (PAR22013) PROJECT: MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSISTING OF
84 DETACHED CONDOMINIUMS AND A 5.91 -ACRE COMMERCIAL

CENTER LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD
AND FELSPAR STREET BOUNDED BY 54 TH STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND 51ST STREET TO THE NORTH (APNS: 169-290-003 & 169-300-016) (APPLICANT: OC INFRA, LLC)
Requested Action: That the City Council (1) receive an introduction of the project design and (2) identify items of concerns or request for additional information that staff will need to address prior to the public hearing(s). Since this is a study session, no action will be taken.

B. CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL RATE CEILING ADJUSTMENT
REQUEST FROM BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the annual rate ceiling adjustment of 5.00% for all residential and commercial customers serviced by Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. per section 17.8 of the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement between the City and Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.

C. INITIATION OF AN AME NDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN

COMMUNITY SAFETY, SE RVICES, AND FACILITI ES ELEMENT TO

MEET STATE LAW
Requested Action: That the City Council initiate an amendment to the General Plan Community Safety, Services, and Facilities Element to meet state law.

17. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

18. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

19. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City
Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the potential lease of certain real property interests in the real property owned by the City of Jurupa Valley located at 5293 Mission B oulevard, Jurupa Valley (Jurupa Valley Operations Center). The parties to the negotiations fo r the purchase of the property are: City of Jurupa Valley and Riverside Community College District. Negotiators for the City of Jurupa are: Rod Butler, Michael Flad

Page - 9 -

and Peter Thorson. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment for the potential lease of the property.

C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to one matter of pending litigation: Elder v. Jurupa Valley , Riverside County Superior Court No.

RIC2003464.

20. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS I N CLOSED

SESSION

21. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of June 2, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council o r other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 19, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.A
FY 2022-23 BUDGET WORKSHOP

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council review the Proposed FY 20 22-23 City Budget and direct staff to make changes as necessary prior to final adoption at a subsequent meeting scheduled on June 16, 2022.

ANALYSIS
Staff has previously provided Council with a Proposed Budget for their review. At this workshop staff is requesting that Council provide input and request any desired changes to the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

OTHER INFORMATION
None.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
None until final Budget adoption

ALTERNATIVES

1. Review and comment on proposed Budget

RETURN TO AGENDA

FUND General Gas Tax Meas. A AQMD SB-1 CDBG Risk Mgmt Info Svcs LLMD CFD Beginning Balance 22,221,783 227,683 2,445,551 446,322 2,544,780 (32,528) - - 742,355 3,240,521 Transfers In/Out (1,188,169) - - - - - 591,743 596,426 - - Revenues 52,068,548 2,824,314 2,330,000 140,838 2,473,935 2,245,215 - - 906,788 1,321,286 Available 73,102,162 3,051,997 4,775,551 587,160 5,018,715 2,212,687 591,743 596,426 1,649,143 4,561,807 Operating
Expenditures:

Council 400,698
City Attorney 1,432,080
City Manager 1,540,700
City Clerk 394,786
Admin Services 1,980,026
Non-Dept 1,511,637
Engineering Dev. 1,785,620
Community
Development 2,880,930
Building Safety 1,897,095
Code Enforcement 1,079,541
PW Operations 2,388,782
Public Safety 22,216,624
Animal Services 1,231,505
County Rev. Sharing
Agreement 7,429,809
Road Maint 2,384,325
Measure A 4,301,903
AQMD 41,421
RMRA SB-1 2,199,358
LLM Districts 1,184,950
CFD's 749,586
CDBG 1,784,575
Risk Mgmt. - 591,743
Info Mgmt. - 596,426
Subtotal 48,169,833 2,384,325 4,301,903 41,421 2,199,358 1,784,575 591,743 596,426 1,184,950 749,586 Balance Remaining 24,932,329 667,672 473,648 545,739 2,819,357 428,112 - - 464,193 3,812,221 Surplus 2,710,546
All Funds Balance Sheet
Estimated FY 2021-2022
FUND General Gas Tax Meas. A AQMD SB-1 CDBG Risk Mgmt Info Svcs LLMD CFD Beginning Balance 24,932,329 227,683 2,445,551 446,322 2,544,780 (32,528) - - 742,355 3,240,521 Transfers In/Out (1,460,245) - - - - - 630,000 830,245 - - Revenues 56,888,618 3,147,273 3,567,000 139,510 2,473,935 2,245,215 - - 906,788 1,391,758 Available 80,360,702 3,374,956 6,012,551 585,832 5,018,715 2,212,687 630,000 830,245 1,649,143 4,632,279 Operating
Expenditures:

Council 409,474
City Attorney 1,475,042
City Manager 2,248,544
City Clerk 475,776
Admin Services 1,859,375
Non-Dept 1,366,991
Engineering Dev. 2,995,597
Community Development 4,263,069
Building Safety 2,128,568
Code Enforcement 1,158,100
PW Operations 3,840,488
Public Safety 23,590,072
Animal Services 1,256,135
County Rev. Sharing
Agreement 7,591,661
Measure A 4,151,115
AQMD 312,260
RMRA SB-1 4,000,000
LLM Districts 1,181,075
CFD's 828,886
CDBG 1,200,000
Risk Mgmt. - 630,000
Info Mgmt. - 830,245
Subtotal 54,658,893 - 4,151,115 312,260 4,000,000 1,200,000 630,000 830,245 1,181,075 828,886 Balance Remaining 25,701,810 3,374,956 1,861,436 273,572 1,018,715 1,012,687 - - 468,068 3,803,393 Surplus 769,480
All Funds Balance Sheet
Estimated FY 2022-2023
FUND
FY 2021-22
Estimated
Actual
FY 2022-23
Proposed
Budget
Beginning Balance 22,221,783 24,932,329
Transfers In/Out (1,188,169) (1,460,245)
Revenues 52,707,317 52,068,548
Available 73,740,931 75,540,632
Expenditures: Difference % Diff. Explanation of Changes Council 400,698 409,474 8,776 2% Increased Community Events $8,500 City Attorney 1,432,080 1,475,042 42,962 3% Estimated increase for the Fiscal Year City Manager 1,540,700 2,248,544 707,844 31% Senior Center under PW ($175K), Human Resources $551K; Consulting Svcs $84K; Federal Lobbiest $60K; Grant Writter $70K & EOC $60K; MDCS $20K
City Clerk 394,786 475,776
80,990 17%
Increased $55K election, Full Time Deputy City Clerk
Admin. Services 1,980,026 1,859,375 (120,651) -6% Transferred HR-Risk to City Manager; 1 new positon Accounting Clerk Non-Dept. 1,511,637 1,366,991 (144,646) -11% Building & vehicle maintenance for all City Facilities moved to Public Works Operations
Engineering Dev. 1,785,620 2,995,597 1,209,977 40% Increases after COVID did not impact development Community
Development 2,880,930 4,263,069
1,382,139 32% New Sr. Planner, Admin. Assistant, Planning Tech, Intern; Increase consultin services
Building Safety 1,897,095 2,128,568
231,473 11%
Increased consulting services due to high development
Code Enforcement 1,079,541 1,158,100 78,559 7% Two new Code Enforcement Officers PW Operations 2,388,782 3,840,488
1,451,706 38% Change due to building and vehicle maintenance & repairs transferred to PW; $170K Senior Center
Public Safety 22,216,624 23,590,072 1,373,448 6% 4.09% Sheriff increase Animal Services 1,231,505 1,256,135 24,630 2% Annual cost increase County Rev. Sharing
Agreement 7,429,809 7,591,661
161,852 2%
County Revenue Neutrality Agreement transferred from Non-Dept Expenditure Totals 48,169,833 54,658,893 6,489,060 11.87% 6,633,706
Balance Remaining 25,571,098 20,881,740
Year to Year General Fund Analysis
Transfers for Risk Management and Information Services
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

ACTUAL BUDGET EST ACTUAL PROPOSED

TAXES AND FRANCHISES
Property Tax- Secured 5,429,240 5,924,406 5,924,406 6,042,894 Property Tax- Unsecured 235,275 258,947 258,947 264,126 Property Tax- Supplemental 150,112 89,203 89,203 90,987 Property Tax- H.O. Exemption 51,681 77,348 77,348 78,895 Property Tax- RDA Pass Thru 2,371,261 1,575,876 1,575,876 1,607,393 Property Tax - SBE Collections 33,101 - - - Property Tax - Miscellaneous 4,682 - - - SB 130 Revenue 8,599,695 8,807,710 8,807,710 8,939,826 Sales and Use Tax 22,213,889 22,551,712 22,551,712 23,980,065 Franchise Fees - Utilities 1,881,028 1,830,085 1,830,085 1,848,385 Franchise Fees - Solid Waste 2,240,268 2,414,585 2,414,585 2,450,803 Admin Fees-Trash Liens 52,715 53,039 53,039 53,040 Property Transfer Tax 468,297 465,000 465,000 465,000 Transient Occupancy Tax 310,493 200,000 200,000 200,000 Measure L 159,580 175,000 175,000 175,000 Total 44,201,317 44,422,910 44,422,910 46,196,415

LICENSES AND PERMITS
Business Registration 91,233 80,000 80,000 80,000 Engineering Fees 1,722,047 1,302,444 1,202,444 2,681,006 Planning Fees 1,480,318 1,656,600 1,231,600 3,351,600 Building Permits 1,694,331 1,678,696 1,678,696 2,153,000 Haul Fixed Fee 28,087
Microfilm Fees 73,976 70,000 70,000 70,000 SMIP & Green Admin Fees 3,491 1,400 1,400 1,400 Application Admin Processing Fee 113,840 95,000 95,000 95,000 DIF Admin fees 50,605 29,000 29,000 29,000 LMS Fee 87,568 55,000 55,000 55,000 Code Enforcement Fees 29,883 30,000 30,000 30,000 Foreclosure Registration Fees 3,900 4,000 4,000 4,000 NPDES Inspection Fees 56,645 55,000 55,000 55,000 Vending Permit Fee 5,940 4,200 4,200 4,200 Fines- Parking 162,938 200,000 200,000 200,000 Fines- Court 207,337 215,000 215,000 215,000 Vehicle Impounds 84,299 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total 5,896,439 5,551,340 5,026,340 9,099,206 City of Jurupa Valley

REVENUE

GENERAL FUND
City of Jurupa Valley

REVENUE

GENERAL FUND

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
AMR System Fees (County) 39,980 48,000 48,000 48,000 Transfer in from SLESF-Grants 35,823 - - - State Grants 12,022
County Reimbursement Revenue 38,195
Special Districts 133,835
Motor Vehicle License - - - - Total 259,855 48,000 48,000 48,000

USE OF MONEY
Interest 105,430 200,000 200,000 200,000 Other 275,076 - - - Total 380,506 200,000 200,000 200,000

OTHER REVENUES
Cell Tower Revenue - 14,000 14,000 14,000 Weed Abatement - - - - Vehicle Abatement 34,449 2,500 2,500 2,500 Cash Over/Short 316 - - - Development Agreements 1,991,742 1,575,000 1,575,000 - Other Revenue - Cannabis Permit Fee 12,500
Donations 1,484
Donations - Restricted - JVBC 104
Miscellaneous Revenue 400,000 400,000 400,000 Total 2,040,595 1,991,500 1,991,500 416,500

INTERFUND CHARGES
Transfer in from DIF 710,435 263,098 253,821 800,000 Measure A Proj. Administration 46,431 105,013 - - Transfer in from CFR - - - - LLMD Administration 52,567 53,097 53,618 54,690 CFD Administration 70,941 72,359 72,359 73,807 Total 880,373 493,567 379,798 928,497 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 53,659,085 52,707,317 52,068,548 56,888,618 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23

ACTUAL BUDGET EST ACTUAL PROPOSED

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
State HUTA-2103 714,429 916,670 916,670 1,064,647 State HUTA-2105 545,551 639,652 639,352 697,426 State HUTA-2106 335,062 386,992 386,992 422,405 State HUTA-2107 738,223 871,300 871,300 952,795 State HUTA-2107.5 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SB-1 RMRA 1,985,163 2,138,959 2,138,959 2,364,035 SB-1 Traffic Cong. Relief - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Interest Income-Grants-Other - 15,000 9,910 9,900 Total HUTA 4,328,428 5,078,573 5,073,183 5,621,208 RCTC Measure A- Local 2,878,604 2,317,000 2,317,000 3,557,000

MARA - - - - Transfer in from DIF- Limonite 53,202 - - - Interest Income 7,793 13,000 13,000 10,000 Total Measure A 2,939,599 2,330,000 2,330,000 3,567,000 SC AQMD 139,826 138,338 138,338 138,757 Interest Income 1,315 2,500 2,500 753 Total AQMD 141,141 140,838 140,838 139,510 CDBG 779,034 1,157,789 1,157,789 1,200,000 Other Revenue - 188,228 188,228 1,045,215 Interest Income - - - - Total CDBG 779,034 1,346,017 1,346,017 2,245,215 TUMF 6,177,592 4,304,200 4,304,200 4,304,200 Other Funding 6,177,592 4,304,200 4,304,200 4,304,200

MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS

REVENUE
City of Jurupa Valley

MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS

REVENUE
City of Jurupa Valley
ATP 538,000 1,545,000 1,545,000 1,545,000 Transfer in From DIF- Streets 263,098 53,503 53,503 53,503 Transfer in From DIF- Signals 134,392 134,392 134,392 Transfer in From DIF- Trails - 75,203 75,203 75,203 Transfer in From DIF- Parks - - - - Interest Income
Other Funding 801,098 1,808,098 1,808,098 1,808,098 State Grants- SLESF 161,129 253,821 253,821 253,821 Interest Income - - - - Other Funding 161,129 253,821 253,821 253,821 CalRecycle Grant Program -
CalRecycle Ongoing Payment 28,000 28,383 28,383 28,383 Other Funding 28,000 28,383 28,383 28,383 Total Other Funding 7,167,819 6,394,502 6,394,502 6,394,502

DIRECT ASSESSMENTS
Landscape and Lighting District 89-1 929,765 898,628 898,628 906,788 CFD 13-001 Bellegrave 515,600 487,019 480,697 487,019 CFD 14-001 Harvest 302,007 275,911 275,911 313,612 CFD 14-002 Mission Estates 159,329 169,658 169,658 165,950 CFD 15-001 Riverbend 118,110 100,352 100,352 122,499 CFD 15-002 Skypark 81,840 82,611 82,611 84,493 CFD 16-001 Quarry 100,274 103,682 103,682 103,758 CFD 14-003 Cantera/Granite Ridge 110,046 108,375 108,375 114,428 CFD 20-001 Shadow Rock/Vista Rio 67 - - - CFD 18-002 Stone 33,663 - - - Total Direct Assessments 2,350,701 2,226,236 2,219,914 2,298,546 Totals 17,706,722 17,516,166 17,504,454 20,265,981 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 37,200 36,000 36,000 36,000 Cafeteria Benefits 67,200 67,200 67,200 79,200 Retirement Contribution 2,790 2,700 2,700 2,700 Other Employee Costs 3,546 2,607 2,607 1,624 Total Personnel 110,736 108,507 108,507 119,524

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 1,124 1,500 1,500 1,500 Professional Services 50,000 137,241 137,241 50,000 Community Promotion 15,148 63,000 63,000 148,000 Cell Phones 6,874 2,500 2,500 2,500 Meetings/Conferences - 10,000 10,000 10,000 Grants 30,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Dues/Memberships 23,862 28,750 28,750 28,750 Furniture & Equipment - 9,200 9,200 9,200 Total Operating 127,007 292,191 292,191 289,950 TOTAL CITY COUNCIL 237,743 400,698 400,698 409,474 Salaries
Professional Services
Community Promotion
Cell Phones
Grants
Meetings/Conferences
Dues/Memberships
Monthly stipend - Set by Government Code 36516 at $600 per month per member.

Council has the option of utilizing monthly $1,650 cafeteria benefit for medical or retirement
$30,000 - Reach Out MOU; $20,000 - JV Chamber of Commerce-MOU;

CITY COUNCIL
GENERAL FUND - 100-1110
City of Jurupa Valley
ICSC and local conferences
$16,000- Western Riverside COG, $12,000- SCAG, $500- ICSC, $250-JV Chamber of Commerce
$10,000 Fireworks, $6,500- Promotional items, $5,000 Community Events,$15,000- Christmas Tree Lighting, $3,000- Council sponsorships, $15,000- State of the City video and Misc other $3,500, $75,000 Annual Parade, $15,000 Townhalls-Homeless,
Cell Phone Invoice includes data charges for Tablets
$40,000 Grants, maximum of $5,000 a grant
Expenditure Explanations
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

OPERATING EXPENSES
Legal Consulting Services 398,059 519,480 519,480 535,064 Litigation 761,381 912,600 912,600 939,978 Total Operating 1,159,440 1,432,080 1,432,080 1,475,042 TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY 1,159,440 1,432,080 1,432,080 1,475,042 Legal Consulting Services
Litigation
City of Jurupa Valley
Cost of special litigation as authorized by City Council Basic services per contract with Richards, Watson, Gershon, LLC Expenditure Explanations

CITY ATTORNEY
GENERAL FUND - 100-1120
FY 2020/21 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 660,320 839,977 839,977 1,231,676 Cafeteria Benefit 105,000 107,800 107,800 198,000 Retirement Contribution 46,044 59,006 59,006 86,217 Other Employee Costs 24,933 32,635 32,635 40,090 Total Personnel 836,298 1,039,418 1,039,418 1,555,984

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 5,060 10,500 10,500 16,000 Books/Subscriptions 1,248 500 500 10,700 Professional Services 83,642 212,112 212,112 391,000 Stipends 200 1,400 1,400 1,400 Litigation Cost - - - - Consulting Services 227,213 62,500 62,500 173,360 Comm. Promotion/Econ Dev 184,088 175,000 175,000 25,000 Postage - - - 300 Cell Phone 1,168 1,320 1,320 1,520 Grant Expenditures 41,460 - - - Meetings/Conferences (680) 10,000 10,000 32,100 Education/Training 8,154 3,000 3,000 4,000 Dues/Memberships - 24,950 24,950 37,180 Furniture & Equipment - - - 20,000 Total Operating 551,553 501,282 501,282 692,560 TOTAL CITY MANAGER 1,387,851 1,540,700 1,540,700 2,248,544 Salaries
Office Supplies
Books/Subscriptions
Professional Services
Stipends
Consulting Services
Comm. Promotion/Econ Dev
Cell Phone
Meetings/Conferences
Education/Training
Dues/Memberships
Furniture & Equipment Mobile Disaster-Communication Station (MDCS) $20K for EOC City of Jurupa Valley
Membership ICSC $500; ICMA $1,400; CCMF$400, Cal Contract Cities $21,150; LWC $4,500; CALPELRA $300; LCW $5,500; PARMA $300; CalPERA $760; PRIMA $770; CSDA $1,600
City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Assistant to the City Manager, Human Resources/Risk Safety Manager, Human Resources Analyst, Human Resources Specialist, Principal Analyst, (2) Management Analysts, Executive Assistantm Intern
$36K-Sacramento Lobbyist; $20K Misc. Consulting Services; $60K Federal Lobbyist; $75K H/R Professional Svcs, $25K Risk Management; $25K Civic Center Study; Grant Writter $70K; EOC Riv. County $80K
HR Green contract services -Deputy City Manager; Executive Recruitment $5,000; Legal Employment $10,000; CPS Written Exam $1,000; Professional Interpreters $5,000; Pre-employment physical, background and degree checks $5,000
Cell phone costs for City Manager and PIO
ICSC $4K; NEOGOV $3K; SHRM $2,500; CalPERA-HR Conference $3K; Employee Celebration Committee $14,700; PARMA $150; LCW $2,500; CalPERA-Risk $2,250
Expenditure Explanations
MMASC $1,500; CalEd $1,500; Risk Management Certification Course (ARM) $1,000
$3,000- Office Supplies, $7,500- Economic Development Supplies/Materials; $1,500-General supplies/open enrollment, ID card; $1,000 -Risk Management; $3,000 Ergonomic equipment & supplies

CITY MANAGER
GENERAL FUND - 100-1130
Stipends for CDBG Committee
Misc. $25,000
Press Enterprise Newspaper $700 - HR Advertisment Jobs Available $5,000; APWA $2,500, Indeed $2,500
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 157,507 193,614 193,614 246,962 Cafeteria Benefit 16,800 16,800 16,800 39,600 Retirement Contribution 11,202 13,944 13,944 17,895 Other Employee Costs 6,615 6,878 6,878 7,769 Total Personnel 192,125 231,236 231,236 312,226

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 1,043 2,000 2,000 2,000 Books/Subscriptions 356 750 750 750 Professional Services 6,304 8,300 8,300 8,300 Elections 61,564 50,000 50,000 50,000 Consulting Services - 56,250 56,250 56,250 Public Notices 62,513 43,000 43,000 43,000 Postage 36 500 500 500 Meetings/Conferences - 1,750 1,750 1,750 Education/Training 462 500 500 500 Dues/Memberships 104 500 500 500 Total Operating 132,620 163,550 163,550 163,550 TOTAL CITY CLERK 324,745 394,786 394,786 475,776 Salaries and Benefits
Books/Subscriptions
Professional Services
Elections
Public Notices
Education/Training
Dues/Memberships International Institute of Municipal Clerks and California City Clerk's Association Certified Municipal Clerk Training - FT Deputy City Clerk City of Jurupa Valley
Municipal Code Publishing Services- Code updates
November 2022 General Municipal Election and Supplies
Mandatory Public Notices (Includes cost to publish Trash Lien notices - Cost offset by Admin. charges)
Expenditure Explanations
City Clerk, (2) Deputy City Clerk (1 Full-Time / 1 Part-Time) Minute Books

CITY CLERK
GENERAL FUND - 100-1140
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 589,250 993,564 993,564 963,888 Cafeteria Benefit 135,800 225,400 225,400 257,400 Retirement Contribution 40,300 69,582 69,582 67,472 Other Employee Costs 19,891 39,825 39,825 29,490 Total Personnel 785,241 1,328,371 1,328,371 1,318,250

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 5,772 8,000 8,000 8,000 Professional Services 501,299 577,400 577,400 449,740 Audit Services 36,080 36,500 36,500 46,200 Postage 149 150 150 200 Bank Service Fees 20,194 21,800 21,800 22,500 Meetings/Conferences 371 1,000 1,000 8,000 Education/Training - 2,500 2,500 6,000 Dues/Memberships 1,010 4,305 4,305 485 Total Operating 566,153 651,655 651,655 541,125 TOTAL ADMIN SERVICES 1,351,394 1,980,026 1,980,026 1,859,375 Salaries and Benefits
Professional Services
Audit Services
Bank Service Fees
Meetings/Conferences
Education/Training
Dues/Memberships
City of Jurupa Valley
Expenditure Explanations

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
GENERAL FUND - 100-1150
Administrative Services Director, Principal Accountant, (2) Accountants II, Purchasing-Buyer, IT Tech, Sr. Accounting Tech, Accounting Tech, (2) Accounting Clerk, and (3) Admin. Support staff
HdL Sales Tax recovery service est. $432K (15% of recoveries), $17,300- HdL Prop Tax services and Statistical data for ACFR
Provides for Independent City Audit $30K ACFR, $2,500 AQMD, $3K State Controller, GANN $700 Single Audit $5K each-$10K
$220- CSMFO; $130 CAPPO $135 MISAC
Charges to process financial transactions such as credit cards.

CSFMO $1,500; GFOA $2,500 CAPPO $1K; MISAC $3K-IT
Finance $1,000; IT $5,000
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries - - - - Cafeteria Benefit - - - - Retirement Contribution - - - - Other Employee Costs 10,204 38,000 38,000 108,664 Total Personnel 10,204 38,000 38,000 108,664

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 15,826 16,000 16,000 10,000 Copying Costs 56,846 48,000 48,000 34,000 Equipment 493 - - - Cleaning Supplies - 15,000 15,000 - Professional Services 15,408 15,820 15,820 15,820 Repairs & Maintenance 103,377 140,400 140,400 - Vehicle Repair 42,636 60,000 60,000 - Postage 17,277 28,000 28,000 18,000 Phone/Internet 36,908 42,000 42,000 42,000 Cell Phones 3,075 3,469 3,469 3,469 Electricity/Gas 34,276 35,000 35,000 - Water and Sewer 4,515 4,500 4,500 - Rent 5,727 3,400 3,400 - Dues/Memberships 9,175 6,500 6,500 Furniture & Equipment 20,594 16,130 16,130 - Debt-Principal & Interest Service - 170,000 170,000 140,000 Interest Expense 11,441 161,699 161,699 195,038 Capital Equipment & Furniture 29,227 200,000 200,000 - Buildings and Improvements 4,074,509 157,719 157,719 - Capital Projects-DIF-HSIP 1,559,596 637,809 350,000 800,000 Total Operating 6,040,904 1,761,446 1,473,637 1,258,327

INTERFUND CHARGES
Risk Management 176,922 591,743 591,743 591,743 Information Systems 342,684 349,017 596,426 349,017 Transfers Out 222,348 - - - Total Interfund Charges 741,954 940,760 1,188,169 940,760 TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 6,793,062 2,740,206 2,699,806 2,307,751 Salaries and Benefits
Copying Costs
Professional Services
Postage
Phone/Internet
Electricity/Gas City Hall facility
Water/Sewer City Hall facility
Rent
Dues/Memberships
Debt-Principal & Interest Service
Capital Projects-DIF
Risk Management
Information Systems
General Fund portion of Risk Management costs- See Risk Mgmt Budget General Fund portion of Info Tech costs- See Info Tech Budget Various CIP projects DIF carryover from FY 2020/21 $1,375,500; new CIP for DIF FY 2021/22 Traffic Signal Upgrades $250,000 and $1,850,000 RBBD Fleet Services Building
Modular storage units
Cal Spec Dist Assoc (Workers' Comp), LAFCO fees
GENERAL FUND - 100-1190
City Hall- Internet and phone systems
PARS Admin ($3,900) Shred It ($720), Paychex processing ($10,000), Paychex HR Admin ($1,200)
Citywide postage costs
Expenditure Explanations
Other Employee cost - Training Academy and tuition reimbursements Provides for all City copiers and per copy charges
City of Jurupa Valley

NON DEPARTMENTAL
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 180,303 967,424 967,424 1,455,868 Cafeteria Benefit 23,240 149,240 149,240 267,300 Retirement Contribution 12,448 68,109 68,109 101,911 Other Employee Costs 6,601 34,173 34,173 46,390 Total Personnel 222,592 1,218,946 1,218,946 1,871,469

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 7,842 14,772 14,772 15,000 Books/Subscriptions - 912 912 2,500 Professional Services 340,501 300,000 300,000 233,850 Commissioner Stipends 4,550 6,000 6,000 6,000 Consulting Services-Reimb - 563,180 563,180 1,663,200 Consulting Services 2,019,019 762,520 762,520 431,250 Public Notices 3,121 2,500 2,500 8,000 Postage - 3,000 3,000 5,000 Meetings/Conferences - 3,500 3,500 14,500 Education/Training 3,500
Dues/Memberships - 3,600 3,600 3,600 Office Furniture and Equip. - - 2,000 5,200 Total Operating 2,375,033 1,659,984 1,661,984 2,391,600 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEV. 2,597,625 2,878,930 2,880,930 4,263,069 Expenditure Explanations
Salaries and Benefits
Books/Subscriptions
Professional Services
Commissioner Stipends
Consulting Services-Reimburseable
Consulting Services- Non Reimburseable
Public Notices
Meetings/Conferences
Dues/Memberships
Office Furniture and Equip File cabinets for planning case files; new copy machine $5,200 APA memberships for each Commissioner
Planning commissioner stipends at $50 per meeting attended Costs for printing public notices for Planning Commission in Local Newspapers
ICSC Las Vegas; (2) Staff Members $2,000/ea- $4,000; APA CA Conference & Hotel for (7) staff members - $6,500; Planning Commission attendance at APA or similar conferences $3,500; per diem and mileage - $500
Civic Solutions contract services for fee based planning services by Civic Solutions
Civic Solutions contract services for non development related projects and programs - includes GP Zoning Consistency work and new Housing related efforts mandated by the state.

City of Jurupa Valley
Community Development
GENERAL FUND - 100-1220
Community Development Director, Deputy Director of Community Development, Planning Manager, (3) Senior Planners, (2) Associate Planners, (2) Assistant Planners, (2) Planning Technicians, (1) Planning Intern, Management Analyst (Housing), Administrative Services Coordinator, Administrative Assistant I
None required- Prof services for development projects are covered in Consulting Services-Reimb. Spanish Translation for public hearings, approx 6/meetings - $5,000; Consultant services for GP & ZC updates - $50,000; Economic Development/Housing on call services $50,000
Land Use Books:2022 Subdivision Map Act; 2022 Planning & Zoning Laws; Field Guide to American Houses; 2022 CEQA Handbook $250; subscription to Western Cities $100, Urban Land Magazine $100 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 295,024 861,584 861,584 930,090 Cafeteria Benefit 33,600 170,800 170,800 198,000 Retirement Contribution 20,971 60,686 60,686 65,841 Other Employee Costs 12,000 47,769 47,769 48,029 Total Personnel 361,595 1,140,839 1,140,839 1,241,960

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 9,605 19,600 19,600 11,800 Books and Subscriptions 4,337 1,500 1,500 6,200 Equipment 2,562 6,200 6,200 3,360 Consulting Services 1,882,983 709,656 709,656 852,618 Cell Phone 2,090 12,000 12,000 1,800 Meeting/Conferences 6 - - - Education and Training 4,279 6,740 6,740 10,270 Dues/Memberships 855 560 560 560 Total Operating 1,906,718 756,256 756,256 886,608 TOTAL BUILDING 2,268,313 1,897,095 1,897,095 2,128,568 Salaries
Office Supplies
Books and Subscriptions
Equipment
Consulting Services
Cell Phone
Education and Training
Dues/Memberships ICC, CALBO
CALBO Education Week, two days for all Building division staff $7,020 Expenditure Explanations
Wi-Fi for iPads used by Building Inspectors $1,800
50% of City Building Official, Building/Code Manager, Part-time Assistant Building Official, Building Inspection Supervisor, Sr. Building Inspector, Management Analyst (2) Building Inspectors, (2) Sr. Permit Technicians, (2) Permit Technicians, 50% Office Assistant II
City of Jurupa Valley

BUILDING SAFETY
GENERAL FUND - 100-1230
HR Green contract services for all building related activities - fee offset.

New Equipment needed to support field staff $300; Shirts, jackets 18 Building division staff $3,060
The State of California is adopting the 2022 California Codes: 11 separate codes ($1,300 per set) $5,200. Supplementary handbooks and reference manuals $1,000
Office supplies to support 10 staff, 3000 permits, Plan labels $1,700; Correction Notices $2K; Door hangers (Notice of Attempt to Inspect) $500; Inspection card stock $1,100; Large project files folders $500; C of O Stationary $1,000; Printers ink (3 Pringers) $2,800; Office supplies $1,000; Kitchen Supplies $1,200 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 474,860 636,550 636,550 672,607 Cafeteria Benefit 102,200 138,600 138,600 168,300 Retirement Contribution 33,054 44,590 44,590 47,083 Other Employee Costs 41,152 70,630 70,617 64,140 Total Personnel 651,266 890,370 890,357 952,130

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 2,556 7,310 7,310 10,576 Books and Subscriptions - 1,528 1,528 1,546 Equipment 4,155 10,560 10,560 8,140 Professional Services 6,320 - - 40,000 Consulting Services 41,610 40,000 40,000 - Weed Abatement 1,990 10,000 10,000 10,000 Graffiti Abatement 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Vehicle Abatement - 3,000 3,000 3,000 Postage 7,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Cell Phone 3,180 13,560 13,560 7,980 Meetings and conferences - - - 500 Education and Training 5,511 10,256 10,256 13,498 Dues/Memberships 1,160 970 970 2,770 Total Operating 153,481 189,184 189,184 205,970 TOTAL CODE ENFORCE 804,748 1,079,554 1,079,541 1,158,100 Salaries
Office Supplies
Books and Subscriptions
Equipment
Professional Services $15,000 VPS (Vacant Property), $25,000 Silver & Wright-Code Enf Attorney fees Weed Abatement
Graffiti Abatement
Vehicle Abatement
Postage
Cell Phones
Meetings and conferences
Education and Training
Dues/Memberships
Includes cell phone and data cost/installments, iPads, N5x1 Ticketing device Point in Count Hosting, Homeless point in time count
City of Jurupa Valley

CODE ENFORCEMENT
GENERAL FUND - 100-1240
50% of City Building Official, Building/Code Manager, Code Enforcement Supervisor, Code Enforcement Officer II, Code Enforcement II, (4) Code Enforcement Officer I, 50% Office Assistant II
Expenditure Explanations
Includes Equipment for field work and electronics
Performed as necessary - Offset by liens on property
Notice of violation, Citations, Door hangers, Correction notices CACEO Annual Training, ICC Exam Cost, CALBO Education week CACEO Membership and application renewal fee
CA adopting 2022 CA Codes. 8 copies of the CA Residential Code and 12 copies of Int. Property Maint. Code
JCSD contract- graffiti removal on private property with owner consent Removal of nuisance vehicles on private property
Notices to property owners for violations via Certified Mail FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

PERSONNEL
Salaries 259,200 1,259,215 1,259,215 2,275,685 Cafeteria Benefit 31,220 236,880 236,880 455,400 Retirement Contribution 17,739 88,819 88,819 159,298 Other Employee Costs 10,726 97,668 97,668 153,510 Total Personnel 318,885 1,682,582 1,682,582 3,043,892

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 2,841 6,000 6,000 10,000 Copying costs - - - - Book s/Subscriptions - 500 500 500 Professional Services - - - 262,000 Professional Services NPDES 24,814 38,000 38,000 - Consulting Engineering 481,144 329,200 329,200 - Contract (consulting )NPDES 512,345 245,000 245,000 - Street Signs - 10,000 10,000 Public Notices - 1,000 1,000 Postage 65 1,500 1,500 500 Uniforms - - - Meetings/Conferences - - - Education/Training - - - 4,000 Dues/Memberships - - - 7,000 NPDES Permit 38,023 75,000 75,000 Vehicle Repair 124,800
Repairs and Maintenance 171,394
Utilities 130,000
Field Maintenance 55,272
Rentals 15,000
Capital Equipment & Furniture 16,130
Total Operating 1,059,233 706,200 706,200 796,596

INTERFUND CHARGES
Risk Management
Information Systems
Total Interfund Charges
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 1,378,118 2,388,782 2,388,782 3,840,488 Salaries and Benefits
Professional Services
Street Signs
Vehicle Repair
Repairs and Maintenance
Utilities
Field Maintenance
Capital Equipment & Furniture
Consultant for Legislative refuse compliance $20K; Employee uniforms Cintas agreement $8K; Hazardous waste pickup $8K; Janitorial Services $56K; Senior Center JARPD Contract $170K
Expenditure Explanations
City of Jurupa Valley

PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND - 100-1310
City Engineer/PW Director, Deputy City Engineer, Sr. Civil Engineer, (2) Associate Engineers, Assistant Engineer, Public Works Operations Manager, PW Field Services Coordinator, PW Facilities Maintenance Specialist, Maintenance Worker III, (3) Maintenance Worker II, (2) Maintenance Worker I,Environmental Program Manager, Traffic Management Analyst, Sr. Management Analyst, (3) Sr. PW Inspectors, (2) PW Inspectors, Administrative Assistant, Sr.

Permit Technician, Permit Technician, (2) Engineering Interns.

To be designated during the Fiscal Year
Tools and equipment $16,130
I-15 Interchange Mainatenance $25,272; Catch Basin Maintenance $25,000; MCE assistance on special event staffing $5,000
Building maintenance for all City facilities $102,000; Fire safety equipment $11,950, JVOC Emergency General annual generator maintenance $2,700; Alarms/Surveillance Systems $26,144; Security alarms and access controls $26,000; Miscellaneous exp $5,000
Utility services of Electicity, Gas, Water and Sewer for City Hall $60,000, JVOC $70,000
City's vehicle maintenance and fleet servicing $60,000; Motor vehicle Fuel $52,000; Vehicle safety retrofit/upgrades to various City vehicles $10,000; Fuel Station maintenance South Coast AQMD permit $2,800
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office Supplies 51 500 500 500 Professional Services 79,208 72,000 72,000 547,000 Consulting Services 1,463,237 1,713,120 1,713,120 2,423,340 Postage - - - 1,500 Meetings and conferences - - - 5,257 Education and Training - - - 5,000 Books and Subscriptions - - - 7,000 Dues/Memberships - - - 3,000 Public Notices - - - 3,000 Cell Phone - - - -
Total Operating 1,542,496 1,785,620 1,785,620 2,995,597

INTERFUND CHARGES
Risk Management
Information Systems
Total Interfund Charges
TOTAL ENG/DEV 1,542,496 1,785,620 1,785,620 2,995,597 Books and Subscriptions
Professional Services
Consulting Engineering
Postage
Meetings and Conferences
Education and Training
Dues/memberships
Public Notices
City of Jurupa Valley

ENGINEERING/ DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL FUND - 100-1320
Publish Bid request for Capital Improvement Projects
Program Compliance $25,000; NPDES Permit $75,000; Procurement of Full Capture Device to comply with MS4 permit $75,000 ; Catch Basin Maintenance Repair $10,000
CISEC annual renewal, continuing education units, and QSP certificates Expenditure Explanations
Engineering/HR Green contract services for development related engineering services - fee offset. Includes costs of Engineering working on development projects being processed by Planning. Traffic Engineering Services $100,000 CAQSA annual conference, APWA engineering specific conferences, Pretreatment Pollution Prevention & Storm Water Conference Subscription for Pavement Management Software Street Saver $7,000 Postage to mail invoices for annual NPDES inspections
Storm Water Certification and Training
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

OPERATING EXPENSES
Professional Services - - - 12,000 Police Contract 18,533,300 21,876,016 21,876,016 23,157,877 Fire Responsibility Area 230,656 340,608 340,608 420,195 Total Operating 18,763,956 22,216,624 22,216,624 23,590,072 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 18,763,956 22,216,624 22,216,624 23,590,072 Professional Services TIP Program
Police Contract
Fire Responsibility Area Wildland fire protection services agreement with Calfire; 50% of Fire Inspector $300,000 estimated $150K
City of Jurupa Valley

PUBLIC SAFETY
GENERAL FUND - 100-1410
Expenditure Explanations
Dedicated patrol officers for Jurupa Valley. 2.50% deputy rate increase FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

OPERATING EXPENSES
Animal Control 464,089 1,231,505 1,231,505 1,256,135 Total Operating 464,089 1,231,505 1,231,505 1,256,135 TOTAL ANIMAL SERVICES 464,089 1,231,505 1,231,505 1,256,135 Animal Control
Expenditure Explanations
Dedicated services for Jurupa Valley. Net of offsetting revenue. Four Spay/Neuter or Vaccination/Micro Chip services at $3,000 each City of Jurupa Valley

ANIMAL SERVICES
GENERAL FUND - 100-1420
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED

OPERATING EXPENSES
Professional Services - - - - Revenue Neutrality 7,434,610 7,429,809 7,429,809 7,591,661 Total Operating 7,434,610 7,429,809 7,429,809 7,591,661 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 7,434,610 7,429,809 7,429,809 7,591,661 Professional Services
Revenue Neutrality
City of Jurupa Valley

COUNTY REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT
GENERAL FUND - 100-1430
Expenditure Explanations
Agreement with County of Riverside
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance (119,057) 227,683 227,683 677,882

REVENUE
Section 2103 714,429 903,285 916,670 1,064,647 Section 2105 545,551 622,685 639,652 697,426 Section 2106 335,062 380,863 386,992 422,405 Section 2107 738,223 790,374 871,300 952,795 Section 2107.5 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Grants - - - - Transfers in/out 265,014 - - - Interest Earnings-Other - 15,000 9,910 9,900 TOTAL REVENUE 2,608,280 2,722,207 2,834,524 3,157,173 Balance Available 2,489,223 2,949,890 3,062,207 3,835,055

PERSONNEL
Salaries 169,660 183,259 183,259 209,978 Cafeteria Benefit 50,400 50,400 50,400 59,400 Retirement Contribution 11,776 12,828 12,828 14,698 Other Employee Costs 20,099 23,118 23,118 22,972 Total Personnel 251,935 269,605 269,605 307,049 City of Jurupa Valley

GAS TAX ROAD MAINTENANCE
SPECIAL REVENUE - 200-2000
Operating Expenses
Professional Services 1,200 - - - Consulting Engineering - - - - Street Maintenance 777,038 740,000 740,000 740,000 Signal Maintenance 482,125 275,000 275,000 275,000 Tree Trimming 167,915 200,000 200,000 200,000 Contract Street Materials 67,874 100,000 100,000 100,000 Street Striping 106,350 150,000 150,000 150,000 Street Signs 40,050 100,000 100,000 100,000 On Call Pvmnt Repair 99,470 120,000 120,000 120,000 Repairs & Maintenance 7,520 10,000 10,000 10,000 Weed Abatement - 5,000 5,000 5,000 Graffiti Abatement Services 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Electric/Gas Cost 122,878 124,720 124,720 124,720 Median Maintenance 53,612 50,000 50,000 50,000 Education/Training 50 5,000 5,000 5,000 Capital Projects 63,524 215,000 215,000 215,000 Total Operating 2,009,605 2,114,720 2,114,720 2,114,720 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,261,540 2,384,325 2,384,325 2,421,769 Ending Fund Balance 227,683 565,565 677,882 1,413,286 Salaries and Benefits
Street Maintenance
Signal Maintenance
Contract Street Materials
Graffiti Abatement Services
Traffic Signal/Pump Electric
Tree Trimming
LLMD Maintenance
Median Maintenance
On Call Pavement Repair
Street Striping
Street Signs
Education/Training
Capital Projects
New and replacement of traffic signs
Contract with MCE for Right of way Maintenance
Electrical costs for city facilities in public right of way Periodic training for in-house maintenance staff
FY 2021-22 CIP $65K-Citywide Guardrail Replacement, $150K Misc. Drainage Repairs, Traffic Safety related items $123,524
Gas tax supplement to LLMD right of way Maintenance - as needed Contract with a vendor for on call repairs to pavement as necessary Maintenance for Van Buren, Etiwanda and Limonite medians Expenditure
Citywide right of way tree trimming under contract
Annual striping program
JCSD supplied Graffiti removal in City right of way
Various materials for repairs, guard rails, pothole mixes, minor material items Includes 3 Public Works personnel and a portion of the Public Works Operations Manager
Traffic Signal Maintenance performed under agreement with Riverside County FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
City of Jurupa Valley

GAS TAX ROAD MAINTENANCE
SPECIAL REVENUE - 200-2000
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 1,540,861 2,445,551 2,445,551 1,126,648 -

REVENUE -
Measure A 2,878,604 2,317,000 2,970,000 3,557,000 Other Revenue
Interest Earnings 7,793 13,000 13,000 10,000 Transfer In 53,202 - - - TOTAL REVENUE 2,939,599 2,330,000 2,983,000 3,567,000 Balance Available 4,480,460 4,775,551 5,428,551 4,693,648

EXPENSES
Operating Expenses
Office Supplies - 4,000 4,000 4,000 Professional Services 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Consulting Engineering - - - - Debt Service 790,000 1,057,800 1,057,800 1,057,800 Interest Expense 266,854 - - - Capital Projects 928,624 2,981,302 3,132,090 2,981,302 Projects Administration 46,431 105,013 105,013 105,013 Total Operating 2,034,909 4,151,115 4,301,903 4,151,115 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,034,909 4,151,115 4,301,903 4,151,115 Ending Fund Balance 2,445,551 624,436 1,126,648 542,533 Professional Services
Debt Service
Capital Projects
Projects Administration
Expenditure Explanations
City of Jurupa Valley

MEASURE A ROAD MAINTENANCE
SPECIAL REVENUE - 210-2100
$3,000- CMFA Fee for bonds
Administrative overhead for Measure A Capital Projects Program $1,057,800 annual debt service payment on COP's for Street rehab project Capital project Cons.& Eng. inspection costs for FY 2021-22 includes project funding more specifically identified in the City's FY 2021-22 CIP Carryovers from FY 20/21
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 1,681,404 2,544,780 2,544,780 2,584,381

REVENUE
SB-1 1,985,163 2,077,597 2,138,959 2,364,035 Traffic Congestion Relief - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Interest Earnings 9,910 - - - Transfer In - - - - TOTAL REVENUE 1,995,073 2,177,597 2,238,959 2,464,035 Balance Available 3,676,477 4,722,377 4,783,739 5,048,416 Operating Expenses
Consulting Engineering 227,683 199,358 199,358 - Capital Projects 904,014 4,247,251 2,000,000 4,000,000 Projects Administration - - - - Total Operating 1,131,697 4,446,609 2,199,358 4,000,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,131,697 4,446,609 2,199,358 4,000,000 Ending Fund Balance 2,544,780 275,768 2,584,381 1,048,416 Capital Projects Capital project construction and engineering inspection costs for FY 2021-22 includes project funding more specifically identified in the City's FY 2021-22 CIP and carryovers from FY 20/21
City of Jurupa Valley
SB-1 RMRA
SPECIAL REVENUE -201-2010
Expenditure Explanations
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 388,258 446,322 446,322 544,411

REVENUE
Intergovernmental 139,826 138,338 138,757 138,757 Interest Earnings 1,315 2,500 753 753 TOTAL REVENUE 141,141 140,838 139,510 139,510 Balance Available 529,399 587,160 585,832 683,921 Operating Expenses
Professional Services - - 13,856 10,000 Motor Vehicle Fuel - - - - Street Signs - 12,000 - 12,000 Vehicle Purchases 83,077 175,130 27,565 290,260 Total Operating 83,077 187,130 41,421 312,260 TOTAL EXPENSES 83,077 187,130 41,421 312,260 Ending Fund Balance 446,322 400,030 544,411 371,661 Professional Services
Street Signs
Vehicle Purchases
City of Jurupa Valley
AQMD
SPECIAL REVENUE - 230-2300
Ford Escape Hybrid $55,130 C/O; $50K Van Pool-Chrysler Pacifica Plug in Hybrid, Nissan for CM; 2 each, $65K each Planning Inspection Vehicles; $55,130 for two each Ford Escape Hybrids for Building Inspectors
Expenditure Explanations
Upgrade/Replace plug in charges at JVOC
Two each-Electronic Reader Signs
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance (32,528) (32,528) (32,528) (65,056)

REVENUE
Federal CDBG 779,034 1,157,789 1,490,221 1,200,000 Other Revenue - 188,228 261,826 468,037 Carryover Revenue - - - 577,178 TOTAL REVENUE 779,034 1,346,017 1,752,047 2,245,215 Balance Available 746,506 1,313,489 1,719,519 2,180,159

EXPENSES
Operating Expenses
Professional Services 22,180 25,000 25,000 - Community Service Programs 170,144 173,668 346,039 170,000 CDBG Administration 107,229 96,943 76,961 76,000 Grant Expenditures 114,535 104,000 51,996 104,000 Capital Projects 364,946 1,655,525 1,284,579 850,000 Total Operating 779,034 2,055,136 1,784,575 1,200,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 779,034 2,055,136 1,784,575 1,200,000 Ending Fund Balance (32,528) (741,647) (65,056) 980,159 Community Svcs. Programs
CDBG Administration
Grant Expenditures
Capital Projects
City of Jurupa Valley

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
SPECIAL REVENUE - 240-2400
GRC Associates and City Staff Admin $88,994
New Capital Projects $850K. Various carryover projects per CIP Expenditure Explanations
Housing Rehab Grants and GRC Admin $104,000
Various community services programs- Recommended, Homeless Services, Senior Nutrition. $150,000 Path of Life, $20,000 FSA
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance

REVENUE
Interfund Charges
Transfer In from Gen Fund 176,922 591,743 591,743 630,000 TOTAL REVENUE 176,922 591,743 591,743 630,000 Operating Expenses
Insurance Premiums 176,922 591,743 591,743 630,000 Total Operating 176,922 591,743 591,743 630,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 176,922 591,743 591,743 630,000 Ending Fund Balance - - - Insurance Premiums
Expenditure Explanations
Insurance premiums paid to PERMA (Public Employer Risk Mgmt. Assoc.) City of Jurupa Valley

RISK MANAGEMENT
INTERNAL SERVICE - 710-7100
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance - - - -

REVENUE
Interfund Charges - - - - Transfer In from Gen Fund 342,684 596,426 549,426 830,245 TOTAL REVENUE 342,684 596,426 549,426 830,245 Operating Expenses
Professional Services 34,765 48,840 48,840 48,840 Hardware/Software Support 198,478 349,017 349,017 449,261 GIS Systems 47,329 55,500 55,500 178,850 Microfilm/Scanning 18,721 112,136 112,136 83,461 Software 30,867 30,433 30,433 30,433 Hardware 12,523 500 500 39,400 Total Operating 342,684 596,426 596,426 830,245 TOTAL EXPENSES 342,684 596,426 596,426 830,245 Ending Fund Balance -
Professional Services
Software Support
GIS Systems-fee paid
Microfilm/Scanning - fee paid
Software
Hardware
City of Jurupa Valley

INFORMATION SYSTEMS
INTERNAL SERVICE - 720-7200
Expenditure Explanations
Miscellaneous hardware and cabling as needed ($500); (4) I-Pad Pros For Building Inspectors to access electronic plans residing in Accela. $1K ea. With case = $5,600; $1K Laptop CD, Desk scanner $800
Professional Services to manage City's network, devices and website - Brea I.T ($48,840)
Tyler-finance system ($8,087), Barracuda ($6,714), Fortinet ($1,200), HdL Bus Lic Software ($2,300), ESET anti-virus($727), City Sourced software ($10,609), cloud based MS Office e-mail back-up service($5,346), Annual Accela permit system support ($115,450), GoGovApps ($32,017), Public Records request annual subscription fee GOVQA ($8,110), NeoGov ($4,200) HR, Video streaming subscription ($19,640), Green Halo ($2,460), Virtual Graffiti ($2,025), IK Consulting for Accela support-New Fee Study updates ($71K), Green Tec- WORM-Laserfiche ($2,211), Adobe ($1,700), CivicPlus-Website support ($5,136), Bluebeam Licenses $650x7=$4,550, Qless Queuing System $20,000 HR Green GIS services; Community Development $
Laserfiche Scanning & Imaging - cost offset w/ Microfilm/Scanning fees $33,461 Bldg, $40,000 Planning
Server upgrades-from Microsoft Windows Server 2008-$20,000, Cloud-to-cloud backup $10,433
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 724,103 742,355 464,193 186,031

REVENUE
Special Assessments 890,944 898,628 898,628 862,528 Balance Transfer from County - - - - Other Revenue 36,086 - - 36,100 Interest Earnings 2,736 8,160 8,160 8,160 TOTAL REVENUE 929,765 906,788 906,788 906,788 Balance Available 1,653,868 1,649,143 1,370,981 1,092,819

EXPENSES
Personnel
Salaries 11,345 11,260 11,260 11,260 Cafeteria Benefit 1,540 1,680 1,680 788 Retirement Contribution 750 788 788 1,680 Other Employee Costs 401 430 430 430 Total Personnel 14,036 14,158 14,158 14,158 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 31,998 52,429 52,429 52,429 Landscaping/Tree Trimming 427,391 246,948 246,948 246,947 Repairs and Maint 35,495 28,325 28,325 28,325 Traffic Signal/Pump Electric 105,236 106,657 106,657 106,657 Street Lighting 143 - - - Water and Sewer 225,368 653,184 653,184 653,184 LLMD Maintenance 19,278 27,497 27,497 23,807 Total Operating 844,910 1,115,040 1,115,040 1,111,350 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 5% 52,567 55,752 55,752 55,567 Total Interfund Charges 52,567 55,752 55,752 55,567 TOTAL EXPENSES 911,513 1,184,950 1,184,950 1,181,075 Ending Fund Balance 742,355 464,193 186,031 (88,256) Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming
Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services
City of Jurupa Valley
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 89-1
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 863,599 1,073,796 1,323,220 1,566,322

REVENUE
Special Assessments 511,897 487,019 470,955 477,082 Interest Earnings 3,703 - 9,742 9,937 TOTAL REVENUE 515,600 487,019 480,697 487,019 Balance Available 1,379,199 1,560,815.27 1,803,917 2,053,341 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 5,895 24,646 24,646 7,133 Signal Maintenance 812 74 74 983 Landscaping/Tree Trimming 202,997 103,073 103,073 245,626 Repairs and Maint 9,023 - - 10,918 Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Electricity/Natural Gas 15,303 16,833
Street Lighting 16,027 35,279 35,279 19,392 Water and Sewer 26,503
CFD Maintenance 1,079 37,665 37,665 1,306 Water Quality Maint. - 15,259 15,259 - Total Operating 277,639 215,996 215,996 302,192 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% 25,044
Transfers Out 2,720 21,599 21,599 30,219 Total Interfund Charges 27,764 21,599 21,599 30,219 TOTAL EXPENSES 305,403 237,595 237,595 332,411 Ending Fund Balance 1,073,796 1,323,220 1,566,322 1,720,930 Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming
Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services
City of Jurupa Valley
CFD 13-001 Bellegrave
350 - 3500
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 550,735 611,132 668,418 725,704

REVENUE
Special Assessments 299,730 275,911 275,911 311,243 Interest Earnings 2,277 - - 2,369 TOTAL REVENUE 302,007 275,911 275,911 313,612 Balance Available 852,742 887,043 944,329 1,039,316 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 4,135 15,239 15,239 5,003 Signal Maintenance - - - - Landscaping/Tree Trimming 161,661 108,309 108,309 195,610 Repairs and Maint 15,092 - - 18,261 Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Street Lighting 7,242 10,085 10,085 8,763 Water and Sewer 29,845
CFD Maintenance 1,670 41,551 41,551 - Water Basin Maint - 23,566 23,566 - Total Operating 219,646 198,750 198,750 227,637 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - 22,764 Transfers Out 21,965 19,875 19,875 Total Interfund Charges 21,965 19,875 19,875 22,764 TOTAL EXPENSES 241,610 218,625 218,625 250,401 Ending Fund Balance 611,132 668,418 725,704 788,915 Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming
City of Jurupa Valley
Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services
CFD 14-001 Harvest
351 - 3510
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL ACTUAL EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 499,435 588,065 658,703 729,341

REVENUE
Special Assessments 157,286 169,658 169,658 163,825 Interest Earnings 2,043 - - 2,125 TOTAL REVENUE 159,329 169,658 169,658 165,950 Balance Available 658,764 757,723 828,361 895,291 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 4,353 8,949 8,949 5,267 Signal Maintenance - - - - Landscaping/Tree Trimming 40,593 34,069 34,069 49,117 Repairs and Maint 695 2,038 2,038 765 Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Traffic Signal/Pump Electric 5,794 8,200 8,200 7,011 Street Lighting 2,384 333 333 2,885 Water and Sewer 9,603 - - CFD Maintenance 850 24,160 24,160 - Water Quality Maint. - 12,269 12,269 - Total Operating 64,272 90,018 90,018 65,045 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - 6,504 Transfers Out 6,427 9,002 9,002 - Total Interfund Charges 6,427 9,002 9,002 6,504 TOTAL EXPENSES 70,699 99,020 99,020 71,549 Ending Fund Balance 588,065 658,703 729,341 823,742 Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services
City of Jurupa Valley
Expenditure
CFD 14-002 Mission Estates
352 - 3520
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 196,130 303,654 396,007 488,360

REVENUE
Special Assessments 117,177 100,352 100,352 121,527 Interest Earnings 934 - - 971 TOTAL REVENUE 118,110 100,352 100,352 122,499 Balance Available 314,240 404,006 496,359 610,859 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 4,368 5,992 5,992 5,992 Signal Maintenance - 1,280 1,280 - Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Street Lighting - - - - Signal maintenance 5,255 - - 1,280 Total Operating 9,623 7,272 7,272 7,272 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - - Transfers Out 962 727 727 - Total Interfund Charges 962 727 727 - TOTAL EXPENSES 10,586 7,999 7,999 7,272 Ending Fund Balance 303,654 396,007 488,360 603,587 Expenditure Explanations
Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services
City of Jurupa Valley
353 - 3530
CFD 15-001 Riverbend
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 131,627 175,527 212,434 249,341

REVENUE
Special Assessments 81,216 82,611 82,611 84,493 Interest Earnings 624 - - 649 TOTAL REVENUE 81,840 82,611 82,611 84,493 Balance Available 213,466 258,137.79 295,045 333,833 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 4,135 6,162 6,162 5,003 Signal Maintenance - - - - Landscaping/Tree Trimming 25,633 10,665 10,665 31,016 Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Street Lighting 685 281 281 829 CFD Maintenance 4,038 24,441 24,441 4,886 Water Quality Maint. - - - - Total Operating 34,490 41,549 41,549 41,733 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - - Transfers Out 3,449 4,155 4,155 - Total Interfund Charges 3,449 4,155 4,155 - TOTAL EXPENSES 37,940 45,704 45,704 41,733 Ending Fund Balance 175,527 212,434 249,341 292,100 Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection
City of Jurupa Valley
354 - 3540
CFD 15-002 Skypark
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 199,344 261,732 308,792 355,852

REVENUE
Special Assessments 99,690 103,682 103,682 103,758 Interest Earnings 583 - - 607 TOTAL REVENUE 100,274 103,682 103,682 103,758 Balance Available 299,618 365,414 412,474 459,610 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 4,282 6,219 6,219 5,181 Signal Maintenance - - - - Landscaping/Tree Trimming 28,389 21,488 21,488 34,350 Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Street Lighting 1,721 551 551 2,083 CFD Maintenance 50 23,217 23,217 61 Water Quality Maint. - - - - Total Operating 34,442 51,475 51,475 41,674 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - - Transfers Out 3,444 5,147 5,147 - Total Interfund Charges 3,444 5,147 5,147 - TOTAL EXPENSES 37,886 56,622 56,622 41,674 Ending Fund Balance 261,732 308,792 355,852 417,935 -
Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection
City of Jurupa Valley
355 - 3550
CFD 16-001 Quarry
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 158,475 192,298 214,882 239,236

REVENUE
Special Assessments 109,404 108,375 108,375 113,760 Interest Earnings 642 - - 668 TOTAL REVENUE 110,046 108,375 108,375 114,428 Balance Available 268,521 300,673.38 323,257.38 353,663.72 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services 4,135 6,403 4,548 5,003 Signal Maintenance - - - - Landscaping/Tree Trimming 57,929 33,573 63,722 70,094 Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Street Lighting 812 - 893 982 CFD Maintenance 4,807 14,242 5,288 5,817 Water Quality Maint. 1,611 23,774 1,772 1,949 Total Operating 69,293 77,992 76,222 83,844 Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - - Transfers Out 6,929 7,799 7,799 - Total Interfund Charges 6,929 7,799 7,799 - TOTAL EXPENSES 76,222 85,791 84,021 83,844 Ending Fund Balance 192,298 214,882 239,236 269,819 Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services City of Jurupa Valley
356 - 3560
CFD 14-003 Granite Ridge/Cantera
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance 588 655 655 655

REVENUE
Special Assessments - - - - Interest Earnings 67 - - - TOTAL REVENUE 67 - - - Balance Available 655 654.96 654.96 654.96 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services - - - - Signal Maintenance - - - - Landscaping/Tree Trimming - - - - Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Street Lighting - - - - CFD Maintenance - - - - Water Quality Maint. - - - - Total Operating - - - - Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - - Transfers Out
Total Interfund Charges - - - -

TOTAL EXPENSES - - - - Ending Fund Balance 655 655 655 655 Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services City of Jurupa Valley
CFD 20-001 Shadow Rock
358 - 3580
Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 FY 2021/22 FY 2022/23
ACTUAL BUDGET EST. ACTUAL PROPOSED
Beginning Fund Balance - 33,663 33,663 33,663

REVENUE
Special Assessments 33,663 - - - Interest Earnings - - - - TOTAL REVENUE 33,663 - - - Balance Available 33,663 33,663.23 33,663.23 33,663.23 Operating Expenses
Consulting Services - - - - Signal Maintenance - - - - Landscaping/Tree Trimming - - - - Graffiti Abatement Services - - - - Street Lighting - - - - CFD Maintenance - - - - Water Quality Maint. - - - - Total Operating - - - - Interfund Charges
Administrative Overhead 10% - - - - Transfers Out
Total Interfund Charges - - - -

TOTAL EXPENSES - - - - Ending Fund Balance 33,663 33,663 33,663 33,663 Consulting Services
Landscaping/Tree Trimming Cost of contract for landscape maintenance services City of Jurupa Valley
CFD 18-002 Stone
359 - 3590
Expenditure
Management of maintenance agreements and inspection services Agenda Item No. 12.A
-1-

MINUTES

OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
May 5, 2022

1. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Leslie Altamirano, Mayor Pro Tem
● Lorena Barajas Bisbee, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
Mayor Chris Barajas called the regular meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee participated via teleconference.

2. INVOCATION was given by Pastor Kermit Perry from 3Ps Christian Ministry.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Rod Butler.

4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Agenda.

Roll Call:

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

5. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES -
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
The City’s Pet of the Month for May, “Duchess”, a 5-month old terrier mix, was introduced to the Council. Anyone interested in giving Duchess a home is invited to contact the City’s Animal Control Services Department at https://www.rcdas.org.

B. PRESENTATION FROM GRID ALTERNATIVES
Victoria Pacheco , Outreach Project Developer , GRID Alternatives , gave a presentation on their programs and services, which provides residential solar power systems and job training for underserved communities. Ms. Pacheco indicated that approximately 50 homes have been solarized in Jurupa Valley . She encouraged

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-

homeowners to apply for their “energy for all” program, which can facilitate a solar system at little to no cost.

6. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Thomas Elder voiced concern regarding the following items: 1) lawsuits having to do with Measure L and a potential settlement; 2) illegal food vendors; 3) his plans to run for City Council; and 4) illegal pot dispensaries.

7. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

8. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments board meeting of May 2, 2022.

B. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission meeting of April 13, 2022.

2. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority meeting of April 22, 2022.

3. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission – Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee meeting of April 25, 2022.

4. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside Transit Agency meeting of April 28, 2022.

9. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

City Manager Rod Butler reported on all the positive comments he received regarding this morning’s Mayor’s Prayer Breakfast. He noted that both Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee and Mike Flad, Assistant to the City Manager are not at tonight’s meeting as they are both participating in the Southe rn Californi a Association of Government’s regional conference.

-3-

10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. APRIL 21, 2022 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Brian Berkson, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Minutes of the April 21, 2022 regular meeting.

Roll Call:

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

11. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN

THE AGENDA

Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.

B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$5,300,321.72

Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated March 30 and April 6, 13, and 20, 2022 as well as the payroll registers dated March 31 and April 1, and 15, 2022.

C. FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR THE FOOD PANTRY
LOCATED AT 5626 MISSION BOULEVARD WITH UNITED SIKH

MISSION
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the First Amendment between the City of Jurupa Valley and United Sikh Mission to install, maintain and repair kitchen equipment and authorize the City Manager to execute the First Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

C. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N O. PS 2022 -001 (PUBLIC

SAFETY, EMERALD RIDGE SOUTH) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY

OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N O. PS 2022 -001 (PUBLIC SAFETY, EMERALD

-4-

RIDGE SOUTH); GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF MISSION BOULEVARD AND AGATE STREET, TR37893.

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-37, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N O. PS 2022 - 001 (PUBLIC SAFETY, EMERALD RIDGE SOUTH) AND TO

AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N O. PS 2022 - 001 (PUBLIC SAFETY, EMERALD RIDGE SOUTH)

A motion was made by Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Consent Calendar.

Roll Call:

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

12. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER (1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 3.75 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THE

METHOD USED FOR CALCULATING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

FOR RETAIL/SERVICE/OFFICE, BUSINESS PARK, INDUSTRIAL, AND

RESIDENTIAL USES AND COMMERCIAL LODGING AND MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENTS, AND (2) A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS,

AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA
Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing and called for any public comments.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was continued to the May 19, 2022 meeting.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

-5-

B. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ZONE Y) TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED
(THE “DISTRICT”) AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARKET STREET WEST OF HALL AVENUE AND NORTH OF 24TH

STREET (WHEELER UPFITTERS)

Staff Report presented by Paul Toor, Public Works Director/City Engineer.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing and called for any public comments.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

At the request of the mayor, the City Clerk reported that one owner cast one ballot.

All votes cast were in favor of the special assessment.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution No. 2022-38, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ZONE Y);

LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARKET STREET , WEST OF
HALL AVENUE AND NORTH OF 24TH STREET TO CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED, CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,

ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA

CONSTITUTION

Roll Call:

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

C. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N O. 20010 FOR A 90,26 2 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER; A ND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERM IT NO. 19003 FOR A P ROPOSED GAS

STATION, CAR WASH, A ND CONVENIENCE STORE (WITH

CONCURRENT SALE OF BE ER AND WINE FOR OFF -PREMISES

CONSUMPTION) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CO RNER OF VAN

-6-

BUREN BOULEVARD AND RUTILE STREET / APNS : 167-330-006; 167- 330-010; 167 -330-015 AND 167 -110-039 (AP PLICANT: CONTROL MANAGEMENT, INC.)

Staff Report presented by Joe Perez, Community Development Director. Mr. Perez outlined two revised Conditions of Approval that are being recommended by City staff: Condition No. 21 (Equestrian Trail); and Condition No. 22 (Landscape Alternative to Equestrian Trail).

Further discussion followed.

Mayor Chris Barajas opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to provide public comments.

Harry Heady, Heady Design, representing the applicant , 7365 Carnelian Street, Rancho Cucamonga, spoke in support of the project . He outlined the challenges they have faced in developing the project in light of the coronavirus. He clarified how the phasing of the project under the Conditional Use Permit will be implemented.

Alex Flores (applicant) provided an overview of the project, stating that they are very excited as to what they are bringing to the City. He explained the challenges in dealing with the coronavirus which caused delays in securing tenants.

Thomas Elder spoke in favor of the project and suggest ed that mem bers of the community should be able to pick and choose who the tenants should be. He suggested relocating the gas station and to ensure 30,000 gallon tanks are being added to limit the number of deliveries.

Amy Tomkins asked for clarification as to t he square footage of the free standing restaurant and the proposed size of the anchor market. She asked where the truck entrance will be situated.

Harry Header addressed some of the previous speaker comments.

Further discussion followed.

There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.

A motion was made by Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, to adopt Resolution No. 2022-39, with the revisions as amended and entitled:

-7-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN EXTENSI ON OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 19003 AND AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 20010 TO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF A 90,262 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER
ON APPROXIMATELY 15. 9 ACRES OF REAL PROP ERTY LOCATED

AT THE SOUTHEAST COR NER OF VAN BUREN BOU LEVARD AND
RUTILE STREET (APNS: 167-330-006, -010, -015; AND 167 -110-039) IN

THE SCENIC HIGHWAY C OMMERCIAL (C -P-S) ZO NE, AND

DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED

Roll Call:

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

14. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.

15. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Council Member Guillermo Silva thanked the Chamber of Commerce for hosting today’s Mayor’s Prayer Breakfast. He stated that he has a positive outlook on the future of the City and he looks forward to the progress that is being made. He conveyed a Happy Mother’s Day message.

16. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 8:43 p.m.

The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held May 19, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 19, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.B

REAFFIRM FINDINGS AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO MEET IN

WHOLE OR IN PART BY TELECONFERENCING UNDER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DURING THE COVID-19

STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCY

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-40, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE CITY

COUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH A TELECONFERENCE OPTION FOR

MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC DUE TO THE
GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF EMERGENC Y AND THE CITY
COUNCIL’S DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e), AND MAKING FINDINGS AND

DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME

BACKGROUND
At the beginning of the COVID -19 Pandemic, the Governor issued an Executive Order allowing the City Council and other City legislative bodies to conduct their meetings, in whole or in part, by telephone or other electronic means. This Executive Order expired but the Legislature adopted Chapter 165 of 2021 (AB 361) th at allows meetings of a legislative body such as the City Council or commissions to be conducted by telephone or other electronic means if certain findings are made concerning an emergency and certain procedures providing for public comment are followed.

A legislative body that meets remotely pursuant to AB 361 must allow members of the public to access the meeting via a call-in option or an internet-based service option, and the agenda for the remote meeting must provide an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the body in real time. Although the agency may still ask for public

RETURN TO AGENDA

-1-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-40

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE

HELD WITH A T ELECONFERENCE OPTION FOR

MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC
DUE TO THE GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF
EMERGENCY AND THE CITY COUNCIL’S

DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e ), AND MAKING

FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE
SAME

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(A) City Council is committed to public access and participation in its meetings and the meetings of all City legislative bodies while balancing the need to conduct public meetings in a manner that r educes the likelihood of exposure to COVID -19 and to support physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
(B) All meetings of the City Council and other City legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City Council and other City legislative bodies conduct their business.
(C) Pursuant to Chapter 165 of the Statutes of 2021 ( Assembly Bill 361 ) legislative bodies of local agencies may hold public meetings via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e), without complying with the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(b)(3), if the legislative body complies with certain enumerated requirements in any of the following circumstances:
1) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing.
2) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. 3) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. -2-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
(d) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention c ontinue to advise that COVID-19 spreads more easily indoors than outdoors and that people are more likely to be exposed to COVID-19 when they are closer than six feet apart from others for longer periods of time;
(e) Due to the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic and th e need to promote social distancing to reduce the likelihood of exposure to COVID -19, the City Council intend s to hold public meetings with an option for members of those bodies and the public to attend by teleconference pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e) based on the following findings:
1) The declared emergency is still in effect. On March 4, 2020, the Governor declared a State of Emergency in California related to the COVID -19 pandemic (the “Emergency”) and this State of Emergency has not been re pealed. On March 20, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-10 declaring a Local Emergency related to the COVID -19 Pandemic, which Local Emergency has been reaffirmed since that time, including the adoption of Resolution No. 2022-07 on January 20, 2022.
2) California State Department of Public Health and Riverside County have each recommended measures to promote social distancing. Thus, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health still requires that employers provide for physical and social distancing in the workplace. Additionally, the Riverside County Department of Public Health still encourages people at risk for severe illness or death from COVID -19 to take protective measures such as social distancing and, for those not yet fully vaccinated, to physically distance from others whose vaccination status is unknown. The County Health Department also continues to recommend that employers take steps to support physical distancing. 3) The City Council reaffirms the findings made in Res olution No. 2022-08 adopted on January 20, 2022. Staff will also present these findings on a monthly basis in the manner provided by Government Code Section 54953(e) thereafter should the above - mentioned conditions continue.

Section 2. The City Council will continue to hold in person public meetings during the Emergency with required social distancing to the extent practicable. The City Council shall have the option to conduct their meetings in whole or in part via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e).

Section 3. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 4. The City Council will reconsider the above findings within thirty days of adoption of this Resolution.

-3-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of May, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-40 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of May, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of May, 2022.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 19, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.C

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY AND KEVIN RYAN FOR AMERICAN RESCUE

PLAN ACT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve an agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Kevin Ryan for American Rescue Plan Act administrative consulting services and authorize the Ci ty Manager to execute the First Amendment in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
On March 21, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) into law. The $1.9 trillion package is intended to directly combat the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic impacts. The ARPA allocates $350 billion towards the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) as fiscal relief for the state and local governments.

The U.S. Department of Treasury issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the SLFRF program on May 10, 2021 which allowed the disbursement of funds to begin. The Interim Final Rule underwent several changes to the provisions and resulted in significant changes which allow for greater f lexibility in the use of funds. The Final Rule was published on January 27, 2022, and became effective April 1, 2022.

To assist the City of Jurupa Valley with the ARPA program the City Manager entered into a Professional Services Agreement for Consulting Services with Kevin Ryan, an independent consultant. The original contract, in the amount of $24,500, was within the City Manager’s signing authority.

All administration is paid directly through the ARPA funding and there is no impact to the General Fund.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS

The City of Jurupa Valley’s allocation is $28 million, which will be distributed in two installments. The first payment in the amount of $14 million was received from the U.S.

Department of Treasury in November of 2021. The second installment of the remaining funds will be received in November of 2022.

The ARPA program ensures that governments have the resources needed to:

 Fight the pandemic and support families and businesses  Improve public health and the economy
 Provide government services by replacing lost public sector revenue  Offset staffing costs for public safety
 Invest in infrastructure projects which include water, sewer and broadband

City staff is currently working through the Final Rule and will bring forwar d a future item to a City Council Study Session outlining the seven main Eligible Expenditure Categories which includes a total of 83 sub-categories. Staff will provide the City Council with project and program options and recommendations with the intent to begin discussions which will lead to the development of the City of Jurupa Valley ARPA spending plan.

Based on the performance of the services provided thus far , staff is recommending the City C ouncil approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services contract .

Amendment No. 1 will extend the terms of the contract to December 31, 2022 and increase the original contract amount by $86,000 for a total not to exceed contract amount of $110,500.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The total cost the City agrees to pay for consulting services is $110,500. If approved, the costs for this service will be paid f or out of Account 252-2527-80701 (ARPA Program Funds). The ARPA funds cover all costs associated with administration of the program.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternate direction to staff to provide the overview of the ARPA Program.

2. Do not approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Kevin Ryan for providing ARPA Program administrative services.

-1-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc

AGREEMENT FOR AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) CONSULTANT

SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND KEVIN RYAN FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of May 19, 2022, between the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) and Kevin Ryan, an independent consultant (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term
This Agreement shall commence on May 19, 2022, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, but in no event later than December 31, 2022, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. Services
Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Performance
Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. Payment
A. The City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Quotation for Service, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed one hundred and ten-thousand five hundred dollars ($110,500.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.

B. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council.

C. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.

Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of

-2-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc
receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant’s fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

5. Suspension or Termination of Agreement without Cause A. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.

B. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.

6. Default of Consultant
A. The Consultant’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.

B. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. Ownership and Maintenance of Documents
A. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities

-3-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

B. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.

8. Indemnification.

Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) with respect to any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively, “Claims” hereinafter), including but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant’s duty to defend pursuant to this Section shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

9. Insurance Requirements.

A. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
a) Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant’s profession. 2) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:

-4-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc
a) Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. 3) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000 unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

B. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (“Additional Insured”) shall be covered as insured’s as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.
4) The Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Consultant of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Consultant shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on

-5-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City’s forms, the Consultant’s insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

E. Modifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable the City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this section.

10. Independent Contractor
A. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.

Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

B. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

11. Legal Responsibilities
The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

12. Confidentiality; Release Of Information
A. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City’s prior written authorization.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order

-6-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc
shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

13. Assignment
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. City consents to the use of the sub-consultants described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub-consultants shall be borne by the Consultant and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.

14. General Provisions
A. Notices
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley 8930 Limonite
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: City Manager

To Consultant: Kevin Ryan
527 Lytle St.

Redlands, Ca 92373

B. Licenses. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

C. Governing Law; Venue
1) The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 2) Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court’s judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

-7-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc
D. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant’s sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant’s sub- Consultants on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

F. Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

G. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

-8-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

Chris Barajas, Mayor

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

CONSULTANT

By:

Name: Kevin Ryan
Title: Consultant, Project Manager

-9-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

 Research and review the compliance and reporting guidelines of the Final Rule for the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA).

 Assist the City in the creation of an ARPA program spending plan.

 Work with City staff to create project and administrative internal tracking reports for ARPA expenditure reporting.

 Work with and assist City staff with the creation of budgets within the ARPA Eligible Categories.

 Work with City staff to identify potential projects and programs that meet the requirements of the ARPA Final Rule.

 Prepare staff reports and power point presentations as needed.

 Responsible for ARPA quarterly Reporting

 Assist the City with any required public outreach

-10-
12774-0001\1689879v1.doc

EXHIBIT B

QUOTATION FOR SERVICE
Kevin Ryan will be compensated a total of $110,500.00 for the administration of the City of Jurupa Valley American Rescue Plan Act Program.

Hourly Rate Total Contract
Kevin Ryan $100.00 $110,500.00

Kevin Ryan is an independent consultant with no employees and no sub-consultants.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 19, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/ CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.D

CONSIDERATION OF RES OLUTIONS REGARDING T HE ANNUAL

ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LA NDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1 C ONSOLIDATED (JV L&LMD NO. 89-1-C) - CITYWIDE

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-41, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE E NGINEER’S REPORT REG ARDING PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022- 23 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, T, U, X, AND Z; AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17 , 19, 39, 41, 62, 69 , 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2 -B, 2 -C, 2 -D, 2 -E, AND 2 -F OF CITY OF JURUPA VA LLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAIN TENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-

CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972.
2) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-42, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY OF JURUPA VALLEY DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21 , 34, 61, 73, 78, 95 , 102, 106, 126, 128 , 132, 137, 141, 142 , 173, 182, A, C, D, E , F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, T, U, X , AND Z ; AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, AND 2-F OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING A ND LIGHTING ACT OF 1 972 FOR THE

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

MAINTENANCE AND SERV ICING OF LANDSCAPING , MULTI -PURPOSE

TRAILS, FENCING, FOSSIL FILTERS, BIO-SWALES, GRAFFITI ABATEMENT,

TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BRI DGE LIGHTS, AND S TREET LIGHTS FOR FIS CAL YEAR 2022-23; AND GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING THE T IME AND

PLACE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNUA L ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE PUBLISHED.

BACKGROUND

Upon incorporation on July 1, 2011, the City of Jurupa Valley assumed the responsibility for certain L&LMD No. 89 -1-C zones now within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. As such, the City is now responsible for the services and charges provided by L&LMD No. 89-1-C zones within its boundaries.

On February 4, 2016, the City adopted Resolution 2016 -01, which clarified the City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-C (JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C) is separate and distinct from the County of Riverside Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C. JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C contains 61 locations throughout the City of Jurupa Valley. The District contains 41 landscaping assessment zones and 20 street lighting assessment zones as described in Attachment 1. The total number of maintained landscape zones is 25 (34 locations), and 18 streetlighting zones (18 locations). The annual levy of assessments on the parcels within the boundaries of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is consistent with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

ANALYSIS

Adoption of Resolution Nos. 2022-41 and 2022-42 will allow the City of Jurupa Valley to collect funds to maintain this Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District.

Consistent with the City Council’s direction regarding compliance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the attached resolutions have been prepared and a public hearing scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on July 7, 2022 to receive testimony for and against the proposed assessments.

OTHER INFORMATION

Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone G, and Street Lighting Zone 69 are not yet maintained and assessed. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor Controller’s Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Zone K, Zone L, Zone M, Zone N, Zone O, Zone S, Zone U, and Zone X are expected to start maintenance in FY2022-2023.

Page | 3

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The annual budget for fiscal year 2022-23 is approximately $1,243,198.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action. This would mean that the City of Jurupa Valley could not continue collecting assessments to pay for maintenance of improvements in these specific rights-of-way and would need to discontinue (a) the maintenance of landscaping, trails, fencing, and irrigation services to these areas, in certain zones, (b) maintaining the fossil filters in certain zones as required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and (c) paying Edison for street light energy costs in certain zones.

2. Provide staff with further direction.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-41

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ORDERING PREPARATION OF THE
ENGINEER’S REPORT RE GARDING PROPOSED ASS ESSMENTS TO
BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 1 6, 17, 21, 34, 61, 7 3, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, T, U, X, AND Z; AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, AND 2-F OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGH TING MAINTENANCE DIS TRICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972
WHEREAS, the City Council (hereinafter the “City Council”) of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) has conducted proceedings for and has established City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California (hereinafter “JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C”) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter the “Streets and Highways Code”); for the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of mult i-purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights-of- way; and graffiti abatement; and
WHEREAS, JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C presently consists of 40 Zones (hereinafter “Zone 4", “Zone 5", “Zone 6", “Zone 7", “Zone 9", “Zone 14", “Zone 16", “Zone 17", “Zone 21", “Zone 34", “Zone 61", “Zone 73", “Zone 78", “Zone 95", “Zone 102", “Zone 106", “Zone 126", “Zone 128", “Zone 132", “Zone 137", “Zone 141", “Zone 142", “Zone 173", “Zone 182” , “Zone A” , “Zone C” , “Zone E” , “Zone F” , “Zone G” , “Zone I”, “Zone K”, ”Zone L”, “Zone M”, Zone N”, “Zone O”, “Zone S”, “Zone T”, “Zone U”, “Zone X” and “Zone Z”, and collectively “Zones”; and 20 Street Lighting Zones (hereinafter “Street Lighting Zone 5", “Street Lighting Zone 7", “Street Lighting Zone 15", “Street Lighting Zone 17", “Street Lighting Zone 19", “Street Lighting Zone 39", “Street Lighting Zone 41", “Stre et Lighting Zone 62", “Street Lighting Zone 69", “Street Lighting Zone 86", “Street Lighting Zone 91", “Street Lighting Zone 93", “Street Lighting Zone 94", “Street Lighting Zone 102", “Street Lighting Zone 2-A", “Street Lighting Zone 2-B", “Street Lighting Zone 2-C", “Street Lighting Zone 2-D", “Street Lighting Zone 2-E", and “Street Lighting Zone 2-F", and, collectively “Street Lighting Zones”); and WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code, ordering the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report (hereinafter the “Report”) in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of the Streets and Highways Code with regard to the assessments which are proposed to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, X T, U, X,

-2-
and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2- C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for the 2022-23 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this action is statutorily exempt under CEQA guidelines Section 15273, as the funds from these assessments will be used for meeting operating expenses, purchasing supplies, materials or equipment, repair and maintenance and not for the extension of capital facilities.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 141, 142, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, P, T, U, X, and Z of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; and,

(b) The installation of irrigation and electrical facilities; and

(c) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone 4 is authorized to provide the following:

(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;

(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of multi-purpose trail lighting;

(c) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of off-leash dog park facilities.

In addition, Zones 5 and 21 are authorized to provide the following:

(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;

(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fencing.

In addition, Zones 14 and 16 are authorized to provide the following:

(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of decorative and monument lighting;

In addition, Zone 141 is authorized to provide the following:

-3-
(a) Maintenance and servicing of bio -swales within the public right -of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff.

(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone 142 is authorized to provide the following:

(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone A is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone C is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.

In addition, Zones E, F, G, K, L, M, N, P, T and O are authorized to provide the following:

(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses

In addition, Zone I is authorized to provide the following:

(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.

(c) The maintenance of the landscape on the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue, at the frontage of the commercial parcel.

-4-
In addition, Zone S is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone U is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone X is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping on Cantu -Galleano Ranch Road, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone Z is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 3. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 126, 128, and 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition Zones 78 and 137 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition Zone 137 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 4. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 106, 132, 173 and 182 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:

-5-
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 5. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F are:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 6. Report. The City Engineer acting on behalf of the City, or his designee, is hereby designated Engineer (hereinafter the “Engineer”) and is ordered to prepare and file with the City Clerk the report with regard to the assessments proposed to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C to pay the costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fencing, fossil filter, bio -swale, and traffic signal improvements; and the provision of electricity for streetlights, and traffic signals for the 2021-2022 fiscal year, pursuant to Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code.

Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.

Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of May, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-6-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-41 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of May, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of May, 2022.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-42

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, T, U, X, AND Z; AND ST REET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, AND 2-F

OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y LANDSCAPING AND LIGH TING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED OF THE

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PURSUANT TO THE LAND SCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING

OF LANDSCAPING, MULT I-PURPOSE TRAILS, FE NCING, FOSSIL

FILTERS, BIO-SWALES, GRAFFITI ABATEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BRIDGE LIGHTS, AND STREETLIGHTS FO R FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 ;

AND GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING THE TIM E AND PLACE OF

THE PUBLIC HEARING O N THE ANNUAL ASSESSM ENT AND

ORDERING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE PUBLISHED

WHEREAS, the City Council (hereinafter the “City Council”) of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) has conducted proceedings for and has established the City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California (hereinafter "JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, which is Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter the "Streets and Highways Code"), for the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of multi -purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights-of- way; and graffiti abatement; and

WHEREAS, as ordered by the City Council, its Designee has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (hereinafter the " Report " ) regarding the assessments to be levied and collected within 40 Zones (hereinafter “Zone 4", “Zone 5", “Zone 6", “Zone 7", “Zone 9", “Zone 14", “Zone 16", “Zone 17", “Zone 21", “Zone 34", “Zone 61", “Zone 73", “Zone 78", “Zone 95", “Zone 102", “Zone 106", “Zone 126", “Zone 128", “Zone 132", “Zone 137", “Zone 141", “Zone 142", “Zone 173", “Zone 182” , “Zone A” , “Zone C” , “Zone E” , “Zone F” , “Zone G” , “Zone I”, “Zone K”, ”Zone L”, “Zone M”, Zone N”, “Zone O”, “Zone S”, “Zone T”, “Zone U”, “Zone X” and “Zone Z”, and collectively “Zones”; and 20 Street Lighting Zones (hereinafter “Street Lighting Zone 5", “Street Lighting Zone 7", “Street Lighting Zone 15", “Street Lighting Zone 17", “Street Lighting Zone 19", “Street Lighting Zone 39", “Street Lighting Zone 41", “Street Lighting Zone 62", “Street Lighting Zone 69", “Street Lighting Zone 86", “Street Lighting Zone 91", “Street Lighting Zone 93", “Street Lighting Zone 94", “Street Lighting Zone 102", “Street Lighting Zone 2-A", “Street Lighting Zone 2-B", “Street Lighting Zone 2-C", “Street Lighting Zone 2-D", “Street Lighting Zone 2-E", and “Street Lighting Zone 2-F", and, collectively “Street Lighting Zones”) of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C for fiscal year 2022-23 to pay the costs of -2-
maintenance services and improvements as identified in the precedi ng recital, and the Report has been presented to and considered by the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the Report filed with the City Clerk states that the assessments to be levied in the respective Zones and Street Lighting Zones for fiscal year 2022-23 are in an amount that is the same as levied in fiscal year 2021-22, or increased by two percent (2%) or more than the assessments levied for fiscal year 2021-22 (based on the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U from March 2021 through March 2022), and are consistent with the terms of the ballot proposition approving the annexation of each zone; and

WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code, which fixes and gives notice, pursuant to Section 22626(a) of the Streets and Highways Code, of the time and place of a public hearing on said Report and the annual assessments for fiscal year 2022-23;

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. Findings.

(a) The Report for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, T, U, X, and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C contains all matters required by Section 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code and may, therefore, be approved by the City Council; and

(b) The 2022-23 fiscal year assessment within Zone 4 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $35.43 per EDU; and within Zone 5 of L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $54.12 per parcel; and within Zone 6 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $252.70 per parcel; and within Zone 7 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $5.52 per acre; and within Zone 9 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $48.36 per parcel; and within Zone 14 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 73.62 per EDU; and within Zone 16 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 62.35 per EDU; and within Zone 17 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $618.81 per acre; and within Zone 21 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $230.37 per parcel; and within Zone 34 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $110.97 per parcel; and within Zone 61 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $67.98 per parcel; and within Zone 73 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $48.34 per parcel; and within Zone 78 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 624.77 per acre; and within Zone 95 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 113.43 per parcel; and within Zone 102 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $226.80 per parcel; and within Zone 106 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 427.52 per acre; and within Zone 126 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 10.34 per acre; and within Zone 128 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 29.64 per parcel; and within Zone 132 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $2,146.60 per acre; and within Zone 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 345.78 per acre; and within Zone 141 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 1,507.47 per acre; and within Zone 142 of JV -3-
L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 287.69 per EDU; and within Zone 173 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $433.44 per acre; and within Zone 182 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $ 3,071.81 per parcel; and within Zone A of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $8,347.35 per parcel; and within Zone C of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 2,185.89 per unit; and within Zone E of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $7,744.73 per parcel; and within Zone F of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $1,223.01 per parcel; and within Zone G of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,032.36 per unit; and within Zone I of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,408.35 per parcel; and within Zone K of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $649.43 per unit; and within Zone L of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $2,965.12 per unit; and within Zone M of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $539.79 per parcel; and within Zone N of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $2476.49 per parcel; and within Zone O of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $306.98 per unit; and within Zone P of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $5,035.00 per unit; and within Zone T of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $2,549.00 per unit; and within Zone U of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $6,281.00 per unit; and within Zone S of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $1,833.33 per unit; and within Zone X of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 32,815.00 per unit; and within Zone Z of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $660.94 per unit; and within Street Lighting Zone 5 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 677.79 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 7 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $340.40 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 15 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $678.21 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 17 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 164.57 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 19 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $340.40 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 39 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $ 73.36 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 41 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $1,119.49 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 62 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $245.20 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 69 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $393.45 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 86 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 183.20 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 91 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $910.48 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 93 of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $1, 674.91 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 94 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $317.96 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 102 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $127.12 per acre; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-A of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $236.98 per unit; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-B of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $93.66 per unit; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-C of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $33.92 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-D of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $457.20 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-E of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C is $ 177.99 per parcel; and within Street Lighting Zone 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C is $24.07 per parcel. The Report proposes a two percent (2%) inflationary increase in the assessment p er acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 4, 6, 7, 9 and 173 over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2021-22 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.

The Report proposes no inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 5, 61, 95, 102, 126, 128, 141, and 142 over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2021-2022 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified e lectors when establishing said zones. The Report proposes a 10% inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 73, 78, 106, 132, 137, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I , K, L, M, N, O, and S over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2021-22 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.

Fiscal year 2022-2023 is the first year of assessment for Zone P, T, U, X, and Z , therefore, no inflationary increase is applied for the fiscal year 2022-2023 levy. The Report proposes a 10 % inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable in Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 9 3, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F over the -4-
assessment levied for fiscal year 2020-21 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.

Section 3. Intent. The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C. There are no parcels or lots within said zones that are owned by a federal or state governmental agency. There are four parcels or lots within said zones that are owned by the local agency (City of Jurupa Valley) and are not subject to special assessment. The assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as property taxes are collected, and all l aws providing for the collection and enforcement of property taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments.

Section 4. Description of Services and Improvements to be provided. The improvements authorized for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 141, 142, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, P, T, U, X, and Z of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:

(a) The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; and,

(b) The installation of irrigation and electrical facilities; and

(c) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone 4 is authorized to provide the following:

(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;

(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of multi-purpose trail lighting;

(c) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of off-leash dog park facilities.

In addition, Zones 5 and 21 are authorized to provide the following:

(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;

(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fencing.

In addition, Zones 14 and 16 are authorized to provide the following:

(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of decorative and monument lighting;

In addition, Zone 141 is authorized to provide the following:

-5-
(a) Maintenance and servicing of bio -swales within the public right -of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff.

(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone 142 is authorized to provide the following:

(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone A is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights wi thin the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone C is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.

In addition, Zones E, F, G, K, L, M, N, P, T and O are authorized to provide the following:

(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses

In addition, Zone I is authorized to provide the following:

(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.

-6-
(c) The maintenance of the landscape on the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue, at the frontage of the commercial parcel.

In addition, Zone S is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone U is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone X is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping on Cantu -Galleano Ranch Road, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone Z is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 5. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 126, 128, and 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:

(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition Zones 78 and 137 are authorized to provide the following:

(a) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition Zone 137 is authorized to provide the following:

(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

-7-
Section 6. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 106, 132, 173 and 182 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:

(a) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 7. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F are:

(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 8. The District. The district is identified as “ City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California”. The boundaries of 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, and S, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are located within the City of Jurupa Valley and are described and shown in the Report.

Section 9. Report. The Report, which is on file with the City Clerk and which has been presented to the City Council, is hereby approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District, and any zones therein, and the annual assessments to be levied upon assessable lots and parcels within 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C.

Section 10. Public Hearing. A Public Hearing will be held on July 7, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. or thereafter, at the City of Jurupa Valley Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 regarding the Report and the proposed assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2020-21 within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E , F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C.

Section 11. Information. Any property owner desiring additional information regarding 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C., the Report, or the proposed assessments shall contact the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley.

-8-
Section 12. Notice of the Public Hearing. Notices of the public hearing shall be given consistent with Section 22626(a) of the Streets and Highways Code. The notice of the public hearing shall be given by publication in an appropriate newspaper of a certified copy of this Resolution once at least ten (10) days prior to July 7th, 2022. Said publication of this Resolution is to be effected by the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley.

Section 13. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.

Section 15. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of May, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-9-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-42 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of May, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of May, 2022.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 APRIL 2022

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FY 2022-2023
FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
VOLUME 1
ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, AND Z.

Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

SUBJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) - CITYWIDE

TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

ENGINEER’S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) was prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum assessments that can be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel of land within each Zone of the District.

The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:

Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and arti cle of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.

I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and bene fited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:

3 | P a g e

1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of lan d, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.

4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Zones 5, 6,7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, and O that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental age ncy that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

5. As of the date of this report, there is one parcel within Zone 4 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Valley. Parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Number 163 -042-043 is the location of Jurupa Valley City Hall. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots are not subject to special assessments.

6. As of the date of this report, there is three parcels within Zone 16 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Vall ey. Parcel identified by Assessor Pa rcel Number s 181052017, 181052018, and 181052004 correspond to the location of Jurupa Valley Operation Center. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots are not subject to special assessments.

May 19, 2022.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

Table of Contents
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 6 ASSESSMENT UNITS .................................................................................................................................. 6 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ................................................................................... 7 Description of Improvements per Zone ................................................................................................ 8 Maintenance Plans .............................................................................................................................. 13 PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ................................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 14 SPECIAL BENEFIT ..................................................................................................................................... 14 GENERAL BENEFIT ................................................................................................................................... 16 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .......................................................................................... 18 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 18 BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE ..................................................................................................................... 19 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 20 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 21

5 | P a g e

BACKGROUND

The Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all a nnual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.

The 1972 Act provides for the annual levy of assessments for the Jurupa Valley L andscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-C, for the express purpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing landscaping, trails, fossil filters, bio -swales, streetlights, traffic signals, basins, and graffiti abatement improvements. The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments for an assessment d istrict after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provisions in Proposition 218.

The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.

Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.

In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners of the assessed parcels must approve any new or increased assessments. Zones included in this Report have been previously approved by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

6 | P a g e

PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.

There are 70 locations within the District: 41 separate assessment zones with 50 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 20 street lighting assessment zones with 20 locations.

There are 52 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (17) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consist of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F, G, P, and Z, and Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on eight (8) locations within the District on Fiscal Year 202 2-2023; these locations are in Assessment District Zone K, L, O, S, T , U, X, and Street Lighting Zone 2-E.

The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 61 existing Zones (70 locations). New or pending Zones will be presented to the City Council under separate reports.

Total number of Zones/Locations: 61 (70 locations)
Assessment Zones: 41 (50 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 20 (20 locations)

Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 34 – within 25 Assessment Zones Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Locations (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 1 8 – within 18 Assessment Zones.

The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:

Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z.

Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F.

ASSESSMENT UNITS
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, Z; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.

Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, and X; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F

7 | P a g e

EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.

Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Locations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zone 137, Zone 173, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone I, Zone M, Zone N, and Zone X; and Street Lighting Zone 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 15, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, Street Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, Street Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2-A, Street Lighting Zone 2-B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, and Street Lighting Zone 2-F.

Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements not yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone G, Zone K, Zone L, Zone O, Zone P, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone X, Zone Z, Street Lighting Zone 69 , and Street Lighting Zone 2-E.

Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone P, and Street Lighting Zone 69.

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:

The installation, maintenance and servicing of ornamental structures, fences, multi -purpose trails, including trees, shrubs, grass, and other ornamental vegetation, and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, street lighting, traffic signals, bridge lights, and drainage devices (bio swales and fossil filters), located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicin g of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.

Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replac ement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.

8 | P a g e

Description of Improvements per Zone

Zone 4:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 4 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fence, dog park, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Zone 5:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Zone 6:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 6 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue
Zone 7:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Etiwanda Avenue Van Buren Boulevard

9 | P a g e

Zone 9:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 9 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Country Village Road Philadelphia Avenue
Zone 14:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 14 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Armstrong Road Sierra Avenue
Zone 16:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 16 generally includes landscaping, streetlight, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Crestmore Road Mission Boulevard
Zone 17:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 17 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Etiwanda Avenue Iberia Street
Zone 21:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 21 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Castlerock Road Galena Street Rutile Street
Zone 34:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 34 generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Lakeside Drive
Zone 61:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 61 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Cydney Circle Halbrook Ter
Zone 73:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 73 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Viaggio Circle
Zone 78:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 78 generally includes fossil filter and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
65th Street Limonite Avenue Pats Ranch Road
Zone 95:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 95 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:
54th Street

10 | P a g e

Zone 102:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 102 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Armstrong Road
Zone 106:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 106 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Country Village Road
Zone 126:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 126 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Harrell Street
Zone 128:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 128 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Granite Hill Drive
Zone 132:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 132 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20TH Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 137:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 137 generally includes fossil filter, streetlight, and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bain Street Bellegrave Avenue Birtcher Drive
Zone 141:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 141 generally includes landscaping, bio-swale, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

A Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 142:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 142 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fencing, fossil filter, traffic signal, and future bio-swale and graffiti abatement improvements within public right-of-ways of:
63rd Street Limonite Ave. Lucretia Ave. Wineville Rd.

Zone 173:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 173 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Caden Way/Project Driveway Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
I-15 on/off ramp Wineville Road

11 | P a g e

Zone 182:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 182 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Wineville Road Mission Boulevard
Zone A:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone A generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Limonite Avenue Median
Zone C:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone C generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Limonite Avenue Felspar Street

Zone E:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone E generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Hall Avenue El Rivino Road
Zone F:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone F generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Pedley Road Golondrina Street
Zone G:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone G generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Avalon Street 36th Street
Zone I:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone I generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue Etiwanda Avenue
Zone K:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone K generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Jurupa Road Pyrite Street
Zone L:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone L generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard 42nd Street
Zone M:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone M generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Riverside Drive Etiwanda Avenue

12 | P a g e

Zone N:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone N generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard 26th Street
Zone O:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone O generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Avlis Lane Viaggio Circle
Zone P:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone P generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Ben Nevis Road Pedley Street

Zone S:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone S generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Pats Ranch Road 68th Street

Zone T:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone T generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard

Zone U:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone U generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard Avalon Street

Zone X
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone X generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Etiwanda Avenue Parkhurst Street

Zone Z:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone Z generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard El Rivino Road Hall Street

13 | P a g e

Maintenance Plans
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are voluminous and are not bound in this Report b ut by this reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection.

Copies are available in the office of the Riverside County Transportation Department, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. See the list below for plan numbers. Reduced maps of the maintained improvements are filled in Part IV of this Report; see Assessment Diagrams.

The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:

ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone A GP14-020/IP14-007
Zone C GP16-025/IP16-012
Zone E GP16-043/IP16-019
Zone F GP16-040/IP16-016
Zone G GP17-025/IP17-006
Zone I LD17-569/IP17-010
Zone K LD18-229/IP13-006
Zone L LD17-351/IP17-003
Zone M LD18-642/IP18-008
Zone N LD19-162/IP18-011
Zone O GP17-034/IP16-001
Zone P Zone P/IP19-005

14 | P a g e

Zone S Zone S/IP19-006
Zone T Zone T/IP20-009
Zone U Zone U/IP21-001
Zone X Zone X/IP19-008
Zone Z Zone Z/IP21-002
PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

INTRODUCTION
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction , maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value.
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating as sessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Constitution (“Article” ) requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.

SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio -swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).

Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City required the original developer to install and /or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels.

15 | P a g e

Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.

In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the District by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping . Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety ( e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the District. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians an d motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign right-of- ways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.

Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District . Streetlights are installed on and are for street purp oses and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed.

Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility . These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility.

The system of streets within the District is established to provide access to each parcel in the District.

Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the install ation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District.

The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets.

Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the District. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the

16 | P a g e

property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well -being for properties with in the District.

Traffic signal assessments are based on traffic studies and/or trip counts. For specific zone benefits, see Part III Estimate of Costs and Expenses.

Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that al l lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are apportioned on a per acre, per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), or per parcel basis.

Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio- swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government-owned easements, uti lity easements, or flood channel parcels . Government -owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.

Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation;
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities;
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not limited to, traffic signals;
• The installation or construction of any faci lities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, wa lls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and;
• The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.

GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement maintenance costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from other City Funds. Because the landscaping,

17 | P a g e

multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement improvements are located immediately adjacent to properties within the District and are maintained solely for the benefit of the properties within the District, any benefit received by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit . As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.

However, some traffic signal impr ovements provide general and specific benefit. It was previously determined that the costs and expenses for the traffic signal improvements are less than the County’s total maintenance cost. Percentages of the County’s total maintenance costs were previously determined from budgets at the time of annexation by Riverside County Transportation Department. These percentages are noted on the applicable Fiscal Year 2022–2023 budgets for those Zones with traffic signal improvements in Part III, Estimate of Costs and Expenses. Therefore, only the costs directly related to the specific benefit of the traffic signal improvements will be assessed to the applicable Zones.

18 | P a g e

PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES

INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.

The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire fiscal year (2022–2023), including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.

The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.

The inflation factor, for those zones with an inflation factor in place, may increase budgets for Zones, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed . However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.

Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 173, may be subject to an annual adjustment of two percent and the maximum assessment for Zones 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for All Items or the CPI-U for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside-San Bernardino -Ontario County California Stand ard Metropolitan Statistical area or, as implemented on December 2017, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The annual CPI-U for All Items or CPI-U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI -U for All Items, or CPI -U for Electricity ann ual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property owners within each of the benefit zones in the District.

19 | P a g e

BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained during fiscal year 202 2-2023 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditures, CPI -U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:

1. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 310-Exp. Detail Rpt.

2. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 320-Exp. Detail Rpt.

3. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; CFD-Exp. Detail Rpt.

4. City of Jurupa Valley Expenditures By GL dated 03/21/2022; CFD-LLMD 21 -22 YEAR END ESTIMATES by GL-Final

5. FY 2021-22 LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone dated 03/21/2022; CFD- LLMD 21-22 YEAR END ESTIMATES

The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were prepared for this report:
(See next page)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 137,573.61$ 6483.36 21.22$ Water 150,328.30$ 6483.36 23.19$ Backflow Certification 469.28$ 6483.36 0.07$ Tree Trimming 30,199.09$ 6483.36 4.66$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 13,257.21$ 6483.36 2.04$ Electricity 18,669.40$ 6483.36 2.88$ Field Inspection/Management 39,387.40$ 6483.36 6.08$ Repair and Replacement 22,994.93$ 6483.36 3.55$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 412,879.23$ COST PER EDU 63.68$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 35,094.73$ 6483.36 5.41$ Contingency 41,287.92$ 6483.36 6.37$ Cell Tower Lease Payment (40,986.63)$ 6483.36 (6.32)$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 35,396.03$ COST PER EDU 5.46$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 448,275.26$ COST PER EDU 69.14$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 229,699.43$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 35.43$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 229,699.43$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 35.43$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 218,575.83$
FY 20-21 CARRYFORWARD* (138,954.80)$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 4 (68-1536)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 11,943.79$ 1409 8.48$ Water 4,090.78$ 1409 2.90$ Backflow Certification 23.95$ 1409 0.02$ Tree Trimming 21,233.39$ 1409 15.07$ Field Inspection/Management 4,337.20$ 1409 3.08$ Repair and Replacement 2,371.03$ 1409 1.68$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 44,000.13$ COST PER PARCEL 31.23$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 3,740.01$ 1409 2.65$ Contingency 4,400.01$ 1409 3.12$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 8,140.02$ COST PER PARCEL 5.78$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 52,140.16$ COST PER PARCEL 37.01$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 77,782.50$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 55.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 76,257.35$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 54.12$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 31,148.36$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 5 (68-1537)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 4,473.34$ 30 149.11$ Water 916.77$ 30 30.56$ Backflow Certification 224.90$ 30 7.50$ Electricity 592.24$ 30 19.74$ Field Inspection/Management 654.18$ 30 21.81$ Repair and Replacement 1,471.60$ 30 49.05$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 8,333.03$ COST PER PARCEL 277.77$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 708.31$ 30 23.61$ Contingency 833.30$ 30 27.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,541.61$ COST PER PARCEL 51.39$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 9,874.64$ COST PER PARCEL 329.15$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,581.06$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 252.70$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,581.06$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 252.70$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 2,293.58$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 292.26$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 6 (68-1538)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 4,339.93$ 2095.48 2.07$ Water 2,921.97$ 2095.48 1.39$ Backflow Certification 57.30$ 2095.48 0.03$ Tree Trimming 1,870.00$ 2095.48 0.89$ Monument Lighting 160.80$ 2095.48 0.08$ Electricity 985.99$ 2095.48 0.47$ Field Inspection/Management 917.84$ 2095.48 0.44$ Repair and Replacement 636.63$ 2095.48 0.30$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 11,890.45$ COST PER ACRE 5.67$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 1,010.69$ 2095.48 0.48$ Contingency 1,189.05$ 2095.48 0.57$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 2,199.73$ COST PER ACRE 1.05$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 14,090.18$ COST PER ACRE 6.72$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,567.99$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5.52$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,567.99$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5.52$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 2,522.19$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 3,976.06$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 7 (68-1539)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 16,220.78$ 493 32.90$ Water 2,764.62$ 493 5.61$ Tree Trimming 1,122.00$ 493 2.28$ Electricity 1,859.22$ 493 3.77$ Repair and Replacement 834.90$ 493 1.69$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 21,679.52$ COST PER PARCEL 46.25$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 1,842.76$ 493 3.74$ Contingency 2,167.95$ 493 4.40$ Capital Improvements 2,418.71$ 493 4.91$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 6,429.42$ COST PER PARCEL 13.04$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 28,108.94$ COST PER PARCEL 59.29$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 23,840.87$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 48.36$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 23,840.87$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 48.36$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 4,268.07$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (3,976.06)$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 9 (68-1540)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 36,537.46$ 1228.98 29.73$ Water 22,842.28$ 1228.98 18.59$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1228.98 0.20$ Backflow Certification 172.83$ 1228.98 0.14$ Tree Trimming 14,209.01$ 1228.98 11.56$ Trash Receptacles 921.80$ 1228.98 0.75$ Electricity 2,532.50$ 1228.98 2.06$ Field Inspection/Management 8,953.98$ 1228.98 7.29$ Repair and Replacement 4,666.62$ 1228.98 3.80$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 91,086.47$ COST PER EDU 74.12$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 6,800.00$ 1228.98 5.53$ Contingency 8,000.00$ 1228.98 6.51$ Capital Improvements 4,336.88$ 1228.98 3.53$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 19,136.88$ COST PEREDU 15.57$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 110,223.35$ COST PER EDU 89.69$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 90,478.89$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.62$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 90,478.89$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.62$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 19,744.46$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (11,233.45)$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 14 (68-1541)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 108,240.00$ 5254.32 20.60$ Water 26,129.54$ 5254.32 4.97$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 5254.32 0.05$ Backflow Certification 59.53$ 5254.32 0.01$ Tree Trimming 17,932.20$ 5254.32 3.41$ Trash Receptacles 1,250.12$ 5254.32 0.24$ Electricity
(Including: Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV, Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen, Monument Lighting)
78,135.06$ 5254.32 14.87 $ Field Inspection/Management 29,339.34$ 5254.32 5.58$ Repair and Replacement 4,643.28$ 5254.32 0.88$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 265,979.07$ COST PER EDU 50.62$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 22,608.22$ 5254.32 4.30$ Contingency 26,597.91$ 5254.32 5.06$ Capital Improvements 12,427.60$ 5254.32 2.37$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 61,633.73$ COST PER EDU 11.73$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 327,612.80$ COST PER EDU 62.35$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 391,922.23$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 74.59$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 327,612.80$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 62.35$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 7,118.74$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 16 (68-1542)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRES Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 5,877.92$ 24.42 240.70$ Water 2,208.09$ 24.42 90.42$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 24.42 10.24$ Backflow Certification 901.68$ 24.42 36.92$ Electricity 164.79$ 24.42 6.75$ Field Inspection/Management 902.24$ 24.42 36.95$ Repair and Replacement 350.00$ 24.42 14.33$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,654.72$ COST PER ACRE 436.31$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRES Administrative Costs 905.65$ 24.42 37.09$ Contingency 1,065.47$ 24.42 43.63$ Capital Improvements 2,485.53$ 24.42 101.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 4,456.65$ COST PER ACRE 182.50$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 15,111.36$ COST PER ACRE 618.81$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 16,877.85$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 691.15$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 15,111.36$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 618.81$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 6,185.08$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 17 (68-1543)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 19,597.83$ 166 118.06$ Water 5,126.10$ 166 30.88$ Backflow Certification 127.15$ 166 0.77$ Tree Trimming 197.96$ 166 1.19$ Electricity 337.80$ 166 2.03$ Field Inspection/Management 2,762.19$ 166 16.64$ Repair and Replacement 1,500.00$ 166 9.04$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 29,649.02$ COST PER PARCEL 178.61$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 2,520.17$ 166 15.18$ Contingency 2,964.90$ 166 17.86$ Capital Improvements 3,106.91$ 166 18.72$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 8,591.98$ COST PER PARCEL 51.76$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 38,241.00$ COST PER PARCEL 230.37$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 39,308.06$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 236.80$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 38,241.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 230.37$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 6,523.38$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 21 (68-1544)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 5,989.50$ 118 50.76$ Water 1,312.30$ 118 11.12$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 118 0.42$ Tree Trimming 3,806.00$ 118 32.25$ Electricity 165.24$ 118 1.40$ Field Inspection/Management 880.00$ 118 7.46$ Repair and Replacement 55.00$ 118 0.47$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 12,258.04$ COST PER PARCEL 103.88$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 1,041.93$ 118 8.83$ Contingency 1,225.80$ 118 10.39$ Capital Improvements 3,106.91$ 118 26.33$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 5,374.64$ COST PER PARCEL 45.55$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 17,632.69$ COST PER PARCEL 149.43$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 13,093.99$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 110.97$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 13,093.99$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 110.97$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 4,538.69$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 2,631.58$
NOTES:

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 34 (68-1545)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 183.70$ 31 5.93$ Field Inspection/Management 56.30$ 31 1.82$ Repair and Replacement 355.21$ 31 11.46$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 595.21$ COST PER PARCEL 19.20$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 50.59$ 31 1.63$ Contingency 59.52$ 31 1.92$ Capital Improvements 500.00$ 31 16.13$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 610.11$ COST PER PARCEL 19.68$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,205.32$ COST PER PARCEL 38.88$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,168.34$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 102.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,107.44$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 67.98$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 826.50$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 61 (68-1546)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 171.60$ 14 12.26$ Field Inspection/Management 343.20$ 14 24.51$ Repair and Replacement 56.30$ 14 4.02$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 571.10$ COST PER PARCEL 40.79$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 48.54$ 14 3.47$ Contingency 57.11$ 14 4.08$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 105.65$ COST PER PARCEL 7.55$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 676.75$ COST PER PARCEL 48.34$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,901.50$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 135.82$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 676.75$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 48.34$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (178.49)$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 73 (68-1547)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7386 -Pats Ranch/Limonite 2,648.64$ 41.35 64.05$ Traffic Signal #7399 -Pats Ranch/64th 10,594.53$ 41.35 256.22$ Traffic Signal #7400 -Pats Ranch/65th 10,594.53$ 41.35 256.22$ Fossil Filters 734.80$ 41.35 17.77$ Field Inspection/Management 1,421.20$ 41.35 34.37$ Repair and Replacement 236.50$ 41.35 5.72$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 26,230.19$ COST PER ACRE 634.35$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 2,229.57$ 41.35 53.92$ Contingency 2,623.02$ 41.35 63.43$ Capital Improvements 3,106.91$ 41.35 75.14$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 7,959.49$ COST PER ACRE 192.49$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 34,189.68$ COST PER ACRE 826.84$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 25,834.37$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 624.77$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 25,834.37$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 624.77$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 8,355.32$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 17,772.89$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Traffic Signal #7386 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500).

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal s #7399 and #7400 were assessed at 100% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signals are 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 78 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 78 (68-1548)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 185.37$ 19 9.76$ Field Inspection/Management 15.03$ 19 0.79$ Repair and Replacement 18.78$ 19 0.99$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 219.18$ COST PER UNIT 11.54$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 18.63$ 19 0.98$ Contingency 21.92$ 19 1.15$ Capital Improvements 900.00$ 19 47.37$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 940.55$ COST PER UNIT 49.50$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,159.72$ COST PER UNIT 61.04$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,370.69$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 124.77$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,155.17$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 113.43$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 95 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 95

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCELS Fossil Filters 693.90$ 26 26.69$ Field Inspection/Management 70.97$ 26 2.73$ Repair and Replacement 56.77$ 26 2.18$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 821.65$ COST PER PARCEL 31.60$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 69.84$ 26 2.69$ Contingency 82.16$ 26 3.16$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 152.00$ COST PER PARCEL 5.85$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 973.65$ COST PER PARCEL 37.45$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,486.58$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 249.48$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,896.89$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 226.80$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 102 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 102

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7358 - Country Village/Vesada 9,844.97$ 18.24 539.75$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 300.00$ 18.24 16.45$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,144.97$ COST PER ACRE 556.19$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 56.10$ 18.24 3.08$ Contingency 66.00$ 18.24 3.62$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 1,500.00$ 18.24 82.24$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,622.10$ COST PER ACRE 88.93$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 11,767.07$ COST PER ACRE 645.12$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,798.00$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 427.52$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,798.00$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 427.52$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 3,969.07$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 6,470.82$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal #7358 was assessed at 75% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 106 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 106 (68-1551)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Fossil Filters 85.80$ 130.53 0.66$ Field Inspection/Management 171.60$ 130.53 1.31$ Repair and Replacement 28.60$ 130.53 0.22$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 286.00$ COST PER ACRE 2.19$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 24.31$ 130.53 0.19$ Contingency 28.60$ 130.53 0.22$ Capital Improvements 40.00$ 130.53 0.31$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 92.91$ COST PER ACRE 0.71$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 378.91$ COST PER ACRE 2.90$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,563.78$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11.98$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,349.55$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 10.34$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 905.95$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 126 (68-1552)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 213.00$ 192 1.11$ Field Inspection/Management 21.58$ 192 0.11$ Repair and Replacement 17.27$ 192 0.09$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 251.86$ COST PER PARCEL 1.31$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 21.41$ 192 0.11$ Contingency 25.19$ 192 0.13$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 57.85$ COST PER PARCEL 0.24$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 309.70$ COST PER PARCEL 1.56$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,260.06$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32.60$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,690.96$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 29.64$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 128 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 128

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7389 - Rubidoux/20th/Market 2,313.75$ 1.4 1,652.68$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 736.96$ 1.4 526.40$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 3,050.71$ COST PER ACRE 2,179.08$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 259.31$ 1.4 185.22$ Contingency 305.07$ 1.4 217.91$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 564.38$ COST PER ACRE 403.13$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 3,615.09$ COST PER ACRE 2,582.21$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,005.23$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,146.60$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,005.23$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,146.60$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 609.85$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 2,672.84$
NOTES:

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal #7389 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 132 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 132 (68-1554)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7338 - Bellegrave/Bain 3,535.21$ 32.61 108.41$ Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 1,868.56$ 32.61 57.30$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 974.33$ 32.61 29.88$ Fossil Filters 1,101.67$ 32.61 33.78$ Field Inspection/Management 550.00$ 32.61 16.87$ Repair and Replacement 220.00$ 32.61 6.75$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 8,249.77$ COST PER ACRE 252.98$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 701.23$ 32.61 21.50$ Contingency 824.98$ 32.61 25.30$ Capital Improvements 1,500.00$ 32.61 46.00$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 3,026.21$ COST PER ACRE 92.80$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 11,275.98$ COST PER ACRE 345.78$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,610.01$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 356.03$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,275.98$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 345.78$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 4,122.63$
NOTES:

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal #7338 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 137 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 137 (68-1555)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 3,300.00$ 9.95 331.66$ Water 1,650.00$ 9.95 165.83$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 9.95 5.53$ Tree Trimming 770.00$ 9.95 77.39$ Bio-swales 165.00$ 9.95 16.58$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 1,102.89$ 9.95 110.84$ Electricity 170.41$ 9.95 17.13$ Field Inspection/Management 18.63$ 9.95 1.87$ Repair and Replacement 110.00$ 9.95 11.06$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 7,341.94$ COST PER ACRE 737.88$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 624.06$ 9.95 62.72$ Contingency 734.19$ 9.95 73.79$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,358.26$ COST PER ACRE #VALUE! TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,700.20$ COST PER ACRE #VALUE! MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 16,499.24$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,658.22$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 14,999.31$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,507.47$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (200.66)$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 141 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 141

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 24,750.00$ 80 309.38$ Water 6,348.63$ 80 79.36$ Backflow Certification 220.00$ 80 2.75$ Tree Trimming 9,900.00$ 80 123.75$ Traffic Signal #1152 - Limonite/Wineville 925.50$ 80 11.57$ Fossil Filters 213.22$ 80 2.67$ Field Inspection/Management 985.14$ 80 12.31$ Repair and Replacement 550.00$ 80 6.88$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 43,892.49$ COST PER EDU 548.66$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 3,730.86$ 80 46.64$ Contingency 4,389.25$ 80 54.87$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 8,120.11$ COST PER EDU 103.99$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 52,012.60$ COST PER EDU 652.65$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 25,316.51$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 316.46$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 23,015.01$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 287.69$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

Zone 142 also includes future parkway landscaping, bio-swales, fossil filters, traffic signal (#1505), and graffiti abatement (Phase 1& 2), which when completed may increase the per EDU assessment by $498.40, adjusted for inflation. At FY18-19 this amount would be $632.08, which when added to the current $277.69 be a total of $909.77.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 142 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Traffic Signal #1152 was assessed at 10% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 142 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 142

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #4572 - CantuGalleano/I-15 514.90$ 9.6 53.64$ Traffic Signal #7348 - CantuGalleano/Caden 1,046.93$ 9.6 109.05$ Traffic Signal #7350 - CantuGalleano/Wineville 1,046.93$ 9.6 109.05$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 1,267.02$ 9.6 131.98$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 3,875.77$ COST PER ACRE 403.73$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 329.44$ 9.6 34.32$ Contingency 387.58$ 9.6 40.37$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 500.00$ 9.6 52.08$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,217.02$ COST PER ACRE 126.77$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 5,092.79$ COST PER ACRE 530.50$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,161.06$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 433.44$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,161.06$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 433.44$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 931.73$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 4,103.34$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 173 (68-1558)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Traffic Signal - Wineville/Mission 7,419.50$ 3 2,473.17$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 4,431.90$ 3 1,477.30$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 11,851.40$ COST PER PARCEL 3,950.47$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 1,007.37$ 3 335.79$ Contingency 1,185.14$ 3 395.05$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 2,192.51$ COST PER PARCEL 730.84$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 14,043.91$ COST PER PARCEL 4,681.30$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,213.93$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,071.31$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,213.93$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,071.31$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 4,829.98$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 8,392.67$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 182 (68-1559)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 2,607.00$ 1 2,607.00$ Mulch 499.80$ 1 499.80$ Water 1,496.00$ 1 1,496.00$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 275.00$ 1 275.00$ Backflow Certification 100.00$ 1 100.00$ Tree Trimming 2,170.94$ 1 2,170.94$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 1 220.00$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 438.70$ 1 438.70$ Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED 499.19$ 1 499.19$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 6,810.63$ COST PER PARCEL 6,810.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 79.72$ 1 79.72$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 626.34$ 1 626.34$ Contingency - Landscaping 736.87$ 1 736.87$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 93.79$ 1 93.79$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,536.73$ COST PER PARCEL 1,536.73$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,347.35$ COST PER PARCEL 8,347.35$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,555.47$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,555.47$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,347.35$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,347.35$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 6,402.42$
NOTES:

Utility Provider: SCE
Water cost included in landscaping item.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE A (68-0023)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 2,740.51$ 4 685.13$ Annual Landscaping Maintenance 3,183.59$ 4 795.90$ Mulch 331.63$ 4 82.91$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 284.90$ 4 71.23$ Backflow Certification 56.98$ 4 14.25$ Tree Trimming 227.92$ 4 56.98$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 134.97$ 4 33.74$ Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED 458.29$ 4 114.57$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 7,418.79$ COST PER PARCEL 1,854.70$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 48.68$ 4 12.17$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 560.01$ 4 140.00$ Contingency - Landscaping 658.83$ 4 164.71$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 57.27$ 4 14.32$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,324.79$ COST PER PARCEL 331.20$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,743.57$ COST PER PARCEL 2,185.89$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,791.27$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,197.82$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,791.27$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,197.82$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 0
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE C (68-9959)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone C is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 5,864.36$ 1 5,864.36$ Mulch 550.00$ 1 550.00$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 1 50.00$ Tree Trimming 295.58$ 1 295.58$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 7,009.95$ COST PER PARCEL 7,009.95$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 595.85$ 1 595.85$ Contingency 700.99$ 1 700.99$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,296.84$ COST PER PARCEL 1,296.84$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,306.78$ COST PER PARCEL 8,306.78$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 562.06$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 25,008.76$
NOTES:

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE E (68-0174)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 4,674.40$ 6 779.07$ Mulch 382.43$ 6 63.74$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 6 41.67$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 6 8.34$ Tree Trimming 509.34$ 6 84.89$ Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 347.08$ 6 57.85$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 6,218.25$ COST PER PARCEL 1,035.55$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 28.49$ 6 4.75$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 503.68$ 6 83.95$ Contingency - Landscaping 592.58$ 6 98.76$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,124.75$ COST PER PARCEL 187.46$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 7,343.00$ COST PER PARCEL 1,223.01$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,414.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,235.67$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,343.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,223.01$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE F (68-0175)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone F is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 10,940.16$ 24 455.84$ Mulch 995.79$ 24 41.49$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 24 10.42$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 24 2.29$ Tree Trimming 1,680.91$ 24 70.04$ Monument Lighting 569.80$ 24 23.74$ Water Quality Basin 5,698.00$ 24 237.42$ Fertilizer Injector 250.71$ 24 10.45$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 468.49$ 24 19.52$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 20,908.86$ COST PER PARCEL 871.20$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 39.84$ 24 1.66$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 1,740.56$ 24 72.52$ Contingency - Landscaping 2,047.73$ 24 85.32$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 46.88$ 24 1.95$ Ad Valorem RPARCELction (7.32)$ 24 (0.30)$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 3,867.70$ COST PER PARCEL 161.15$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 24,776.56$ COST PER PARCEL 1,032.36$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24,813.78$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,033.91$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24,776.56$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,032.36$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE G (68-9957)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone G is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 3,894.00$ 2 1,947.00$ Mulch 141.23$ 2 70.61$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 2 125.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 2 25.00$ Tree Trimming 256.78$ 2 128.39$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 2 110.00$ Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED 393.39$ 2 196.70$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 5,205.41$ COST PER PARCEL 2,602.70$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 33.44$ 2 16.72$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 409.02$ 2 204.51$ Contingency - Landscaping 481.20$ 2 240.60$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 39.34$ 2 19.67$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 963.00$ COST PER PARCEL 481.50$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6,168.41$ COST PER PARCEL 3,084.20$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,816.70$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,408.35$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,816.70$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,408.35$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT (3,351.70)$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD (2,621.73)$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE I (68-9960)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 5,270.31$ 25 210.81$ Mulch 548.99$ 25 21.96$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 25 10.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 25 2.20$ Tree Trimming 1,092.08$ 25 43.68$ Water Quality Basin 5,903.13$ 25 236.13$ Fertilizer Injector 259.74$ 25 10.39$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 1,347.17$ 25 53.89$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 14,726.42$ COST PER PARCEL 589.06$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 114.51$ 25 4.58$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 1,139.36$ 25 45.57$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 134.05$ 25 5.36$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 134.72$ 25 5.39$ Ad Valorem RPARCELction (13.19)$ 25 (0.53)$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,509.44$ COST PER PARCEL 60.38$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 16,235.86$ COST PER PARCEL 649.43$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 17,276.20$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 691.05$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 16,235.86$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 649.43$
ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Street lights costs include general and in-tract streetlights. Refer to Zone K Engineer's Report.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

ZONE K (68-9961)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 5,811.96$ 4 1,452.99$ Water 1,777.78$ 4 444.44$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 4 62.50$ Backflow Certification 110.00$ 4 27.50$ Tree Trimming 1,025.64$ 4 256.41$ Fertilizer Injector 501.42$ 4 125.36$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 245.29$ 4 61.32$ Electricity 341.88$ 4 85.47$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,063.97$ COST PER PARCEL 2,515.99$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 20.85$ 4 5.21$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 836.72$ 4 209.18$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 984.37$ 4 246.09$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 24.53$ 4 6.13$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,866.46$ COST PER PARCEL 466.61$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 11,930.43$ COST PER PARCEL 2,982.61$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,860.48$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,965.12$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,860.48$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,965.12$
ZONE DEFICIT (69.95)$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE L (68-9962)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 6,837.60$ 1 6,837.60$ Mulch 712.25$ 1 712.25$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 1 55.00$ Tree Trimming 256.41$ 1 256.41$ Streetlights LS-1 150 W 9500 Lumen LED 506.67$ 1 506.67$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 8,617.93$ COST PER PARCEL 8,617.93$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 43.07$ 1 43.07$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 691.58$ 1 691.58$ Contingency 813.63$ 1 813.63$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 50.67$ 1 50.67$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,598.94$ COST PER PARCEL 1,598.94$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 10,216.87$ COST PER PARCEL 10,216.87$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 10,255.95$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 539.79$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 10,216.87$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 539.79$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 4,665.68$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE M (68-0234)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 2,808.88$ 2 1,404.44$ Mulch 199.29$ 2 99.64$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 2 125.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 2 27.50$ Tree Trimming 512.82$ 2 256.41$ Streetlights LS-1 22 W 9500 Lumen LED 231.45$ 2 115.73$ Streetlights LS-1 84 W 9500 Lumen LED 118.38$ 2 59.19$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 4,175.82$ COST PER PARCEL 2087.9115

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 29.73$ 2 14.87$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 327.34$ 2 163.67$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 385.10$ 2 192.55$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 34.98$ 2 17.49$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 777.15$ COST PER PARCEL 388.58$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 4,952.97$ COST PER PARCEL 2,476.49$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,991.45$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,495.72$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,952.97$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,476.49$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 2,224.51$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE N (68-0235)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 1,641.02$ 10 164.10$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 10 25.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 10 5.50$ Tree Trimming 256.41$ 10 25.64$ Streetlights LS-1 39 W 9500 Lumen LED 384.21$ 10 38.42$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 2,586.64$ COST PER PARCEL 258.66$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 32.66$ 10 3.27$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 189.33$ 10 18.93$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 222.74$ 10 22.27$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 38.42$ 10 3.84$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 483.15$ COST PER PARCEL 48.32$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 3,069.80$ COST PER PARCEL 306.98$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,108.88$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 310.89$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,069.80$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 306.98$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 1,485.67$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE O (68-0236)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 13,395.36$ 4 3,348.84$ Mulch 1,395.35$ 4 348.84$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 4 62.50$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 4 12.50$ Tree Trimming 1,150.00$ 4 287.50$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED 753.63$ 4 188.41$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 16,994.34$ COST PER PARCEL 4,248.59$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 64.06$ 4 16.02$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 1,380.56$ 4 345.14$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 1,624.07$ 4 406.02$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 75.36$ 4 18.84$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 3,144.05$ COST PER PARCEL 786.01$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 20,138.39$ COST PER PARCEL 5,034.60$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 20,140.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,035.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 20,140.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,035.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE P (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 4,811.52$ 5 962.30$ Mulch 501.20$ 5 100.24$ Water 3,107.76$ 5 621.55$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 5 50.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 5 10.00$ Tree Trimming 800.00$ 5 160.00$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 5 44.00$ Streetlights LS-1 70 W LED 422.22$ 5 84.44$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED 291.75$ 5 58.35$ Electricity 300.00$ 5 60.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,754.45$ COST PER PARCEL 2,150.89$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 60.69$ 5 12.14$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 853.44$ 5 170.69$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 1,004.05$ 5 200.81$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 71.40$ 5 14.28$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,989.58$ COST PER PARCEL 397.92$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 12,744.03$ COST PER PARCEL 2,548.81$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 12,744.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,549.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 12,744.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,549.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE T (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 2,281.00$ 1 2,281.00$ Mulch 237.60$ 1 237.60$ Water 1,198.98$ 1 1,198.98$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 1 50.00$ Tree Trimming 500.00$ 1 500.00$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 1 220.00$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED 145.88$ 1 145.88$ Streetlights LS-1 22 W LED 117.84$ 1 117.84$ Electricity 300.00$ 1 300.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 5,301.30$ COST PER PARCEL 5,301.30$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 22.36$ 1 22.36$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 428.19$ 1 428.19$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 503.75$ 1 503.75$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 26.30$ 1 26.30$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 980.60$ COST PER PARCEL 980.60$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6,281.90$ COST PER PARCEL 6,281.90$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE U (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 3,041.50$ 3 1,013.83$ Mulch 316.80$ 3 105.60$ Water Meter 64.90$ 3 21.63$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 3 83.33$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 3 18.33$ Tree Trimming 247.50$ 3 82.50$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W 9500 Lumen LED 277.20$ 3 92.40$ Electricity 330.00$ 3 110.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 4,582.90$ COST PER PARCEL 1,527.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 24.20$ 3 8.07$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 368.50$ 3 122.83$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 433.40$ 3 144.47$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 27.50$ 3 9.17$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 853.60$ COST PER PARCEL 284.53$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1 5,500.00$ COST PER PARCEL 1,900.00$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,500.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,833.33$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,500.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,833.33$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:
1 Rounded to the nearest hundred.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE S (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021
Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 13,038.72$ 1 13,038.72$ Mulch 1,459.50$ 1 1,459.50$ Water 7,923.36$ 1 7,923.36$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 100.00$ 1 100.00$ Tree Trimming 4,400.00$ 1 4,400.00$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 1 220.00$ Electricity 300.00$ 1 300.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 27,691.58$ COST PER PARCEL 27,691.58$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Landscaping 2,353.78$ 1 2,353.78$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 2,769.16$ 1 2,769.16$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 5,122.94$ COST PER PARCEL 5,122.94$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 32,814.52$ COST PER PARCEL 32,814.52$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE X (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Annual Landscaping Maintenance 42,284.22$ 202.02 209.31$ Mulch 1,459.50$ 202.02 7.22$ Water 9,804.00$ 202.02 48.53$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 500.00$ 202.02 2.48$ Backflow Certification 100.00$ 202.02 0.50$ Tree Trimming 20,000.00$ 202.02 99.00$ Graffitti Abatement 3.25$ 202.02 0.02$ Fertilizer Injector 3,400.00$ 202.02 16.83$ Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Cactus Ave 5,000.00$ 202.02 24.75$ Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Sandstone Rd 10,000.00$ 202.02 49.50$ Traffic Signal El Rivino Rd & Cedar/Rubidoux Blvd 4,000.00$ 202.02 19.80$ Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Hall Ave 4,000.00$ 202.02 19.80$ Traffic Signal - Agua Mansa Rd/ Market St 2,000.00$ 202.02 9.90$ Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Market St/20th St 3,000.00$ 202.02 14.85$ Streetlights LS-1 LED (El Rivino Rd, Hall Ave, Brown Ave) 612.08$ 202.02 3.03$ Streetlights LS-1 LED (Rubidoux Blvd) 1,960.61$ 202.02 9.71$ Electricity 600.00$ 202.02 2.97$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 108,723.66$ COST PER ACRE 538.18$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs (8%) 8,684.46$ 202.02 42.99$ Inspections (5%) 5,427.79$ 202.02 26.87$ Operating Reserve, Repairs, and Replacements (10%) 10,855.57$ 202.02 53.74$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 24,967.82$ COST PER ACRE 123.59$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 133,691.48$ COST PER ACRE 661.77$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 133,524.00$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 660.94$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 133,524.00$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 660.94$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE Z (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

20 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS

A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Theref ore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.

Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.

APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Page B-1

Page B-2

Page B-3

Page B-4

Page B-5

Page B-6

Page B-7

Page B-8

Page B-9

Page B-10

Page B-11

Page B-12

Page B-13

Page B-14

Page B-15

Page B-16

Page B-17

Page B-18

Page B-19

Page B-20

Page B-21

Page B-22

Page B-23

Page B-24

Page B-25

Page B-26

Page B-27

Page B-28

Page B-29

Page B-30

Page B-31

Page B-32

Page B-33

Page B-34

Page B-35

Page B-36

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED º
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGUA
MANSARD
EL RIVINO RD
BROWN
AVE
HALLAVE
VICINITY MAP
ZONE E
POR. TRACT OF JURUPA RANCHO For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the applicable Assessor s Parcel Numbers, refer to the County Assessor s Map as of the date of the Report.
SHEET 1 OF 1
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT 1500 Iowa Avenue Suite 210 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 787-8421 Fax (951) 682-3379 175-220-021-6
Project Site
HALL AVE
JUNE 2017
NTSP S O M A S
175-220-021-6
EL RIVINO RD
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM / BOUNDARY MAP PM 24088
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED º
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEDLEY
RD
AG
ATE
ST
TO
M
CIR
TOTTEN PL
KIM LNGREG PLTERRIE TER
54TH ST
VICINITY MAP
ZONE F
POR. SE 1/4, S 1/2, SEC 14, T.2S. R6W For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the applicable Assessor s Parcel Numbers, refer to the County Assessor s Map as of the date of the Report.
SHEET 1 OF 1
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT 1500 Iowa Avenue Suite 210 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 787-8421 Fax (951) 682-3379 169310013-2
Project Site
PEDLEY RD
JUNE 2017
NTSP S O M A S
169310013-2
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM / BOUNDARY MAP TR 36912
12 | P a g e

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE I
4802 Etiwanda Avenue

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA POR NW1/4, SEC 16, T.2S, R6W

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
159-101-031

159-101-031

Project Site
159-101-051
159-101-051

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE M
PM 37125 – PILOT FLYING J

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 21 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, PORTIONS OF LOTS F, 20, 27, 28, AND 51 THROUGH 58, INCLUSIVE, OF THE HOOVER TRACT, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 17, PAGE 56, OF MAPS, TOETHER WITH THOSE PROTIONS OF LOTS 3, 6, 11, 14 AND THE SOUTH HALF OF A 40 FOOT ROAD OF THE MAP OF THE WEST COAST DEVELOPMENT COMPANY’S SUBDIVISION, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 60, OF MAPS, BOTH FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY.

For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
156-120-005 through 156-120-019 (inclusive), 156-
120-025, 156-120-028, 156-120-030, 156-120-032,
and 156-090-026

ETIWANDA AVE

RIVERSIDE DR
Project Site

VICINITY MAP

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE O
TR 32723

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA E ½ W ½ NW ¼ SEC 18 T.2S. R.5W.

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
183-310-034, 183-310-035, 183-310-036,
183-310-037, 183-310-038, 183-310-039,
183-310-040, 183-310-041, 183-310-042,
183-310-043
Project Site
183-310-034
183-310-036
183-310-038
183-310-037
183-310-041
183-310-042
183-310-035
183-310-040
183-310-039
183-310-043
14 | P a g e

VICINITY MAP

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE S

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA POR SO ½ SEC.30, T.2S, R.6W

ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.

Subzone Boundary
152-020-021
152-020-022
152-020-012

Project Site

PATS RANCH ROAD
FREEWAY I-15
68TH STREET

IVORY STREET

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ZONE U

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC.10 T.2S R.5W
26TH ST

RUBIDOUX BLVD

AVALON ST

LOCATION MAPVICINITY MAP

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS

OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
178-140-027
¯
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT
P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI,
Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
SITE
¯

FOR DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND

DIMENSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE ASSESSOR'S

PARCEL NUMBERS, REFER TO THE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP AS OF THE DATE OF THE REPORT.
178-140-027
Subzone Boundary
14 | P a g e

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED ZONE Z LLMD89-1-C
PM 37528

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4, 7, 8, 9 AND 15 AND PORTION OF LOT 3, ALL LOTS OF MAP OF RIVINO HEIGHTS BLOCK 1, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGES 145 OF MAPS, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF RIVINO BOULEVARD (VACATED), ALSO TOGETHER WITH LOTS 1 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, OF RIVINO GARDENS, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21, PAGE 29 OF MAPS, ALSO TOGETEHR WITH PARCEL “B” OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 5218, RECORDED MAY 29, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0291639 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND PARCELS “A”, “B”, AND “C” OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA 1718, RECORDED JUNE 30, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0394779 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, ALL IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WITH SECTIONS 2 AND 3, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF.

ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT 175-170-040 (A)
175-170-046 (P)
175-200-001 (P)
175-200-008 (P)

175-200-008 (P)
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.

Subzone Boundary
ALL

PORTION
175-170-036
175-170-040
175-170-043
175-170-046

Project Site
175-180-001
175-200-001
175-200-002
175-200-003

175-200-003
175-200-004
175-200-005
175-200-007

175-200-008
175-200-009

VICINITY MAP
175-200-002 (A)
175-200-003 (A)
175-200-004 (A)
175-200-005 (A)
175-200-007 (A)
175-170-046 (A)
175-170-043 (A)
175-170-046 (P)
175-180-001 (P)
175-200-001 (P)
175-200-009 (P)

175-170-046 (P)
175-180-001 (P)
175-200-009 (P)

175-170-046 (A)

EL RIVINO ROAD
(A)
(P)
Legend
175-200-008 (A)

21 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

The following Assess Rolls for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were prepared for this report:
(See next page).

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 MAY 2022

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FY 2022-2023
FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
VOLUME 2

STREET LIGHTING ZONES
5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, AND 2-F
Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

SUBJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) - CITYWIDE

TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

ENGINEER’S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) has been prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum assessments that can be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel of land within each Zone of the District.

The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the pro visions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 , being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:

Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Di strict No. 89-1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing wi th Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Divisio n 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and arti cle of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.

I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of t he costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and be nefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on beh alf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:

3 | P a g e

1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited there by in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, sh owing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and par cels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the nu mbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.

4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2 -C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

May 19, 2022.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

Table of Contents
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 6 ASSESSMENT UNITS .................................................................................................................................. 6 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ................................................................................... 7 Description of Improvements per Zone ................................................................................................ 8 Maintenance Plans .............................................................................................................................. 10 PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ................................................................................................... 11 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 11 SPECIAL BENEFIT ..................................................................................................................................... 11 GENERAL BENEFIT ................................................................................................................................... 13 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .......................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 14 BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE ..................................................................................................................... 14 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 16 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 17

5 | P a g e

BACKGROUND

The Report is prepared in compliance with the requi rements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Par t 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and High ways Code.

Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all annual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professi onal engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.

The 1972 Act provides for the annual levy of assessments for the Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C, for the express pu rpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing landscaping, trails, fossil filters, bio-swales, st reetlights, traffic signals, basins, and graffiti a batement improvements. The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments f or an assessment district after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provisions in Proposition 218.

The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.

Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the Distric t. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.

In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners of the assessed parcels must approve any new or increased assessments. Zones included in this Report have been previously approved by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

6 | P a g e

PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans a nd specifications for the improvements are as set fort h on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.

There are 70 locations within the District: 41 separate assessment zones with 50 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 20 street lighting assessment zones with 20 locations.

There are
52 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (1 7) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consist of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F, G, P, and Z, an d Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on eight (8) locati ons within the District on Fiscal Year 2022-2023; these locations are in Assessment District Zone K, L, O, S, T , U, X, and Street Lighting Zone 2-E.

The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 61 exis ting Zones (70 locations). New or pending Zones wil l be presented to the City Council under separate reports.

Total number of Zones/Locations: 61 (70 locations)
Assessment Zones: 41 (50 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 20 (20 locations )

Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 34 – within 25 Assessment Zones

Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Location s (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 18 – within 18 Assessment Zones

The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:

Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z.

Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F.

ASSESSMENT UNITS
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.

7 | P a g e

Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, and X; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F

EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.

Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Lo cations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zon e 137, Zone 173, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone I, Zone M, Zone N, and Zone X; and Street Lighting Zon e 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 1 5, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, S treet Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, St reet Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2-A, Street Lighting Zone 2-B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, and Street Lighting Zone 2-F.

Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements no t yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone G, Zone K, Zone L, Zone O, Zone P, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone X, Zone Z, Street Lighting Zone 69, and Street Lightin g Zone 2-E.

Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Z one C, Zone F, Zone P, and Street Lighting Zone 69.

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:

The installation, maintenance and servicing of orna mental structures, fences, multi-purpose trails, including trees, shrubs, grass, and other ornamenta l vegetation, and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, street lighting, traffic signals, bridge lights, and drainage devices (bio swales and fossil filters), located in public rights-of-way within th e boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordina ry and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandbl asting, and painting of walls and other improvement s to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the fu rnishing of electricity for the lighting and operat ion of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.

Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution def ines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the c ost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but

8 | P a g e

is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the ma intenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.

Description of Improvements per Zone

Street Lighting Zone 5:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 5 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Galena Street
Street Lighting Zone 7:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 7 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Jurupa Road
Street Lighting Zone 15 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 15 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Etiwanda Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 17 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 17 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

La Rue Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 19 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 19 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 39 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 39 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Limonite Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 41 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 41 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Riverview Drive
Street Lighting Zone 62 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 62 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20 th Street

9 | P a g e

Street Lighting Zone 69 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 69 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Carrerra Court Mustang Lane
Street Lighting Zone 86 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 86 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue Rutile Street
Street Lighting Zone 91 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 91 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Amarillo Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 93 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 93 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
37 th Street Wallace Street
Street Lighting Zone 94 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 94 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20 th Street Van Dell Road
Street Lighting Zone 102 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 102 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Fleming Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-A:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-A generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bain Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-B:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-B generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Mission Boulevard Pyrite Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-C:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-C generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Lamelas Cir Sunnyhill Drive
Street Lighting Zone 2-D:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-D generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Iberia Street Etiwanda Avenue

10 | P a g e

Street Lighting Zone 2-E:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-E generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20 th Street Caterpillar Court
Street Lighting Zone 2-F:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-F generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue
Maintenance Plans
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are volum inous and are not bound in this Report but by th8s reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection.

Copies are available in the office of the Riverside County Transportation Department, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. See the list below for plan numbers. Reduced maps of the maintained improvements are filled in Part IV of this Report; see Assessment Diagrams.

The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:

ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone 2 -A IP17 -007
Zone 2 -B IP16 -010
Zone 2 -C IP16 -009
Zone 2 -D IP18 -007
Zone 2 -E GP19 -007
Zone 2 -F IP18 -001

11 | P a g e

PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

INTRODUCTION
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the cons truction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value.
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflec ts the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Cons titution (“Article”) requires that a parcel’s asses sment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportio nal special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are ass essable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a p arcel. A special benefit is a particular and disti nct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.

SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trail s, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlight s, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti ab atement provides direct and special benefit to thos e properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).

Each and every lot or parcel within the District, r eceives a particular and distinct benefit from th e improvements over and above general benef its conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the cr eation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City r equired the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels.

Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.

In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the District by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for

12 | P a g e

those properties in close proximity to the landscap ing. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., cont rol sight distance restrictions and fire haza rds), improved neighborhood property protection a nd aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the District. Stre etlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the Distric t during the nighttime hours, and to assign right-o f- ways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.

Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District. Streetlights ar e installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed.

Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility.

The system of streets within the District is establ ished to provide access to each parcel in the Distr ict.

Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, s pecial benefit of the parcels within the District.

Finally, the servicing of streetlights provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being fo r properties within the District.

Because all benefiting properties consist of a unif orm land use, it is determined that all lots or par cels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights are apportioned on a per acre or per parcel basis.

Based on the benefits described above, streetlights are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government-owned easements, utility easements, or flood channel parc els. Government-owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or e xperience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or ot her structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not receive

13 | P a g e

any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.

Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including traffic signals, • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenan ce or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, t he installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and; • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.

GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcel s within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total streetlight servicing costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from othe r City Funds. Because the streetlights are located immediately adjacent to properties within the Distr ict and are maintained solely for the benefit of th e properties within the District, any benefit receive d by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit. As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.

14 | P a g e

PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES

INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.

The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire fiscal year (2022–2023), including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.

The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any s urplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.

The inflation factor, for those zones with an infla tion factor in place, may increase budgets for Zone s, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed. However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.

Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F, may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario County California Standard Metropolitan Statist ical area or, as implemented on December 2017, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistic s of the United States Department of Labor. The annua l CPI-U for All Items or CPI-U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI-U for All Items , or CPI-U for Electricity annual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property owners within each of the benefit zones in the District.

There is a two percent proposed inflationary increa se in the maximum assessment per parcel or per acre as applicable in Street Lighting Zones 7, 41, 62, 69, 86, 93, and 102 over the maximum assessment for fiscal year 2021-2022 (if applicable), and is c onsistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.

BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained dur ing fiscal year 2022-2023 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditure s, CPI-U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:

1. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 310-Exp. Detail Rpt.

2. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 320-Exp. Detail Rpt.

3. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; CFD-Exp. Detail Rpt.

4. City of Jurupa Valley Expenditures By GL dated 03/2 1/2022; CFD-LLMD 21-22 YEAR END ESTIMATES by GL-Final

15 | P a g e

5. FY 2021-22 LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estim ates by Zone dated 03/21/2022; CFD- LLMD 21-22 YEAR END ESTIMATES
The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were prepared for this report:
(See next page)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 551.23$ 1 551.23$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 551.23$ COST PER PARCEL 551.23$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 46.85$ 1 46.85$ Contingency 55.12$ 1 55.12$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 27.56$ 1 27.56$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 129.54$ COST PER PARCEL 129.54$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 680.77$ COST PER PARCEL 680.77$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 2.98$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 5 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 275.63$ 1 275.63$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 275.63$ COST PER PARCEL 275.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 23.43$ 1 23.43$ Contingency 27.56$ 1 27.56$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 13.78$ 1 13.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 64.77$ COST PER PARCEL 64.77$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 340.40$ COST PER PARCEL 340.40$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 369.17$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 369.17$ .

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 7 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 551.23$ 1 551.23$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 551.23$ COST PER PARCEL 551.23$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 46.85$ 1 46.85$ Contingency 55.12$ 1 55.12$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 25.00$ 1 25.00$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 126.98$ COST PER PARCEL 126.98$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 678.21$ COST PER PARCEL 678.21$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 679.54$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 679.54$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 678.21$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 678.21$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 15 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 1,152.84$ 9.85 117.04$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 253.07$ 9.85 25.69$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,405.91$ COST PER ACRE 142.73$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 119.50$ 9.85 12.13$ Contingency 25.31$ 9.85 2.57$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 70.30$ 9.85 7.14$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 215.10$ COST PER ACRE 21.84$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,621.01$ COST PER ACRE 164.57$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,731.96$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 175.83$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,621.01$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 164.57$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 17 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 275.63$ 1 275.63$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 275.63$ COST PER PARCEL 275.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 23.43$ 1 23.43$ Contingency 27.56$ 1 27.56$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 13.78$ 1 13.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 64.77$ COST PER PARCEL 64.77$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 340.40$ COST PER PARCEL 340.40$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 374.22$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 374.22$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 19 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 730.59$ 4.72 154.79$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 730.59$ COST PER ACRE 154.79$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 62.10$ 4.72 13.16$ Contingency 73.06$ 4.72 15.48$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 30.00$ 4.72 6.36$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 165.16$ COST PER ACRE 34.99$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 895.75$ COST PER ACRE 189.78$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 346.27$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.36$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 346.27$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.36$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 549.48$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 39 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 187.98$ 0.37 508.05$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 187.98$ COST PER ACRE 508.05$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 15.98$ 0.37 43.18$ Contingency 18.80$ 0.37 50.81$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 10.00$ 0.37 27.03$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 44.78$ COST PER ACRE 121.02$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 232.76$ COST PER ACRE 629.07$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 414.21$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,119.49$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 414.21$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,119.49$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 41 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 551.23$ 3.84 143.55$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 551.23$ COST PER ACRE 143.55$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 46.85$ 3.84 12.20$ Contingency 55.12$ 3.84 14.36$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 25.00$ 3.84 6.51$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 126.98$ COST PER ACRE 33.07$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 678.21$ COST PER ACRE 176.62$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 941.57$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 245.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 941.57$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 245.20$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 62 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 450.00$ 6.45 69.77$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 450.00$ COST PER ACRE 69.77$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRE COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 38.25$ 6.45 5.93$ Contingency 45.00$ 6.45 6.98$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 83.25$ COST PER ACRE 12.91$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 533.25$ COST PER ACRE 82.67$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,538.34$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 393.54$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,537.76$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 393.45$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 69 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 695.08$ 20.18 34.44$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 884.65$ 20.18 43.84$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,579.73$ COST PER ACRE 78.28$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 134.28$ 20.18 6.65$ Contingency 157.97$ 20.18 7.83$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 78.99$ 20.18 3.91$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 371.24$ COST PER ACRE 18.40$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,950.97$ COST PER ACRE 96.68$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,697.01$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 183.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,697.01$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 183.20$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 86 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 718.72$ 3.87 185.72$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 2,275.98$ 3.87 588.11$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 2,994.70$ COST PER ACRE 773.82$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 254.55$ 3.87 65.77$ Contingency 299.47$ 3.87 77.38$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 100.00$ 3.87 25.84$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 654.02$ COST PER ACRE 169.00$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 3,648.71$ COST PER ACRE 942.82$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,523.55$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 910.48$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,523.55$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 910.48$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 125.16$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 91 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 377.18$ 0.5 754.36$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 377.18$ COST PER ACRE 754.36$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 32.06$ 0.5 64.12$ Contingency 37.72$ 0.5 75.44$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 18.86$ 0.5 37.72$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 88.64$ COST PER ACRE 177.27$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 465.82$ COST PER ACRE 931.63$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 938.35$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,876.70$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 938.35$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,876.70$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 93 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 1,288.40$ 3.66 352.02$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,288.40$ COST PER ACRE 352.02$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 109.51$ 3.66 29.92$ Contingency 128.84$ 3.66 35.20$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 60.00$ 3.66 16.39$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 298.35$ COST PER ACRE 81.52$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,586.75$ COST PER ACRE 433.54$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,163.75$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 317.96$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,163.75$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 317.96$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 423.01$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 94 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 255.31$ 2.38 107.27$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 255.31$ COST PER ACRE 107.27$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 21.70$ 2.38 9.12$ Contingency 25.53$ 2.38 10.73$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 47.23$ COST PER ACRE 19.85$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 302.54$ COST PER ACRE 127.12$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 459.88$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 193.23$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 302.54$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 127.12$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 102 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent 599.94$ 3 199.98 $ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 599.94$ COST PER PARCEL 199.98$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 50.99$ 3 17.00$ Operating Reserve 59.99$ 1 59.99$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 110.99$ COST PER PARCEL 76.99$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 710.93$ COST PER PARCEL 276.97$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 715.01$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 715.01$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 710.93$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 236.98$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 1,108.80$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-A (68-9963)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 100 Watt 9,500 Lumen LED Equivalent 112.87$ 3 37.62$ Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent 124.25$ 3 41.42 $ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 237.12$ COST PER PARCEL 79.04$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 20.15$ 3 6.72$ Operating Reserve 23.71$ 3 7.90$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 43.87$ COST PER PARCEL 14.62$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 280.98$ COST PER PARCEL 93.66$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 282.57$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 94.19$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 280.98$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 93.66$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 339.62$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-B (68-9956)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 50 Watt LED 335.73$ 16 20.98$ Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 122.27$ 16 7.64$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 458.00$ COST PER PARCEL 28.62$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 38.93$ 16 2.43$ Operating Reserve 45.80$ 16 2.86$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 84.73$ COST PER PARCEL 5.30$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 542.73$ COST PER PARCEL 33.92$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 545.78$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 34.11$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 542.73$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 33.92$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 419.78$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-C (68-9964)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 771.65$ 2 385.83$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 771.65$ COST PER PARCEL 385.83$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 65.59$ 2 32.80$ Operating Reserve 77.17$ 2 38.58$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 142.76$ COST PER PARCEL 71.38$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 914.41$ COST PER PARCEL 457.20$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 919.55$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 459.77$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 914.41$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 457.20$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 754.20$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 FY20-21 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-D (68-0238)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 85 Watt LED 1,201.60$ 8 150.20$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,201.60$ COST PER PARCEL 150.20$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 102.14$ 8 12.77$ Operating Reserve 120.16$ 8 15.02$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 222.30$ COST PER PARCEL 27.79$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,423.89$ COST PER PARCEL 177.99$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,431.90$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 178.99$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,423.89$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 177.99$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 1,224.52$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-E (68-0239)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 85 Watt LED 121.88$ 6 20.31$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 121.88$ COST PER PARCEL 20.31$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 10.36$ 6 1.73$ Operating Reserve 12.19$ 6 2.03$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 22.55$ COST PER PARCEL 3.76$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 144.43$ COST PER PARCEL 24.07$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 145.24$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24.21$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 144.43$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24.07$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 45.34$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-F (68-0240)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

16 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS

A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.

Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.

APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Page B-1

Page B-2

Page B-3

Page B-4

Page B-5

Page B-6

Page B-7

Page B-8

Page B-9

Page B-10

Page B-11

Page B-12

Page B-13

Page B-14

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-A
Serrano Business Center (PM 36828)

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 9, T.2S., R.6W., S.B.M. Schedule “E”

VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
156-210-093

156-210-093

Project Site
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-B
TR 36977

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA T2SR6W SEC 12 PSEC

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
171-260-013

171-260-013
Project Site

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2 - C
TR 32722

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 7, T.2S, R. 5W

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT

174-170-039
174-170-03040
174-170-03041

Project Site

16 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

The following Assess Rolls for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 were prepared for this report:
(See next page).

17 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

The following Assess Rolls for Fiscal Year 2022-2023
were prepared for this report:
(See next page).

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 19, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.E

RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF ZONE EE (TROY

COURT INDUSTRIAL) TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD 89-1-C”), ON THE WEST SIDE OF TROY COURT

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-43, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE EE AND THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ASSESS MENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIII

D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-44, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ENGINEER REGARDING THE

PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENA NCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE EE AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF

ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-45, entitled:

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE EE AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEA R 2023-2024 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA

CONSTITUTION AND APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING

PROTESTS

BACKGROUND
Upon incorporation on July 1, 2011, the City of Jurupa Valley assumed the responsibility for certain City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C zones now within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. As such, the City is now responsible for the services and charges provided by the City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89 -1-C zones within its boundaries. City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89-1-C currently includes 70 locations within 61 zones; and currently maintains and services 52 locations (43 Zones) throughout the City of Jurupa Valley. The District contains 41 landscaping assessment zones and 20 street lighting assessment zones. The annual levy of assessments on the parcels within the boundaries of L&LMD No. 89-1-C is consistent with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

On February 4, 2016 the City adopted Resolution No. 2016-01 clarifying that the City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89 -1-C is distinct from the County of Riverside Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated and assumes all responsibility f or such district, including annexation of territory to the district.

The parcel owner, Daniel Karcher, requested annexation of the site into the existing City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C in order to cover costs associated with the maintenance of public improvements within the annexation known as Zone EE. The territory proposed to be annexed includes three parcels identified as APNs 167-110-035, 167-110-036, and 167-110-037, generally located south of Galena Street along the west side of Troy Court.

The annexation was formed in order to maintain the street right-of-way/streetscape area which maintenance includes:
 The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation within the public right -of-way park way landscaped area, as identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for this Zone;  The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris;  The installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities; and,
 The maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing.

Page | 3

ANALYSIS
Adoption of Resolution Nos. 2022-43, 2022-44, and 2022-45 will allow the City of Jurupa Valley to collect funds to maintain Zone EE of this Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District.

The proposed annexation will have an initial Maximum Assessment for the Zone in the amount of $5,100; to be equally divided by the number of assessable parcels within the zone boundary. These rates may be adjusted annually by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index over the base year of 2022. The owners have filed a petition representing their willingness to move forward.

Consistent with the City Council’s direction regarding compliance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the attached resolutions have been prepared and a public hearing scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on July 7, 2022 to receive testimony for and against the proposed assessments.

OTHER INFORMATION
None.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The property owners are responsible for the annual payments of the special assessment.

The City will file the special assessment with the County Auditor -Controller for inclusion on the annual property tax roll. The property owners have posted a deposit wit h their application to form Zone EE, in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the annexation. Approval of this resolution does not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability by ZONE EE. The City’s cost to administ er Zone EE annually will be reimbursed through the special assessment charged to property owners.

The revenue from this special assessment will be deposited into City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C and will be used to pay for the services as listed above. Both the revenue and expenses will be part of the City’s FY 20 23-2024 Adopted Budget, and there is no anticipated impact to the general fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide staff with further direction.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-43

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-

CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE EE AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 23- 2024 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF

THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHW AYS CODE AND ARTICLE

XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley proposes to annex territory, described below in Section 2 of this Resolution, to an existing landscaping and lighting district located within the City of Jurupa Valley, which was established pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of t he California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") and which is designated as City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (hereinafter referred to as the "District") and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution against lots and parcels within such territory to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described below in Section 3 of this Resolution for the fis cal year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024.

Section 2. The territory proposed to be annexe d to the District includes three (3) parcels identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 167-110-035, 167 -110-036, and 167 -110-037, located west side of Troy Court, south of Galena Street. Such territory is shown on a map on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection.

Section 3. The proposed improvements are briefly described as follows: The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation within the public right-of-way parkway landscaped area identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for this Zone; the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurten ant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris; the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities; the design, furnishing, construction, and installation of landscaping and irrigation improvements to meet the City’s current standards for L&LMD; and the maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing.

Section 4. After the proposed territory is annexed to the District, the District shall continue to be designated as City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated.
-2-
12774-0001\1909270v1.doc
Section 5. Lots or parcels of land within the territory proposed to be annexed to the District that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local governmental entity, the State of California, or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements.

Section 6. The City Council here by orders the City Engineer, or his designee, to prepare and file with the City Clerk a rep ort in writing in connection with the annexation of territory described herein to the District and the levy and collection of assessments against lots and parcels of land within such territory. This report shall be prepared in accordance with the Act and Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of May, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-3-
12774-0001\1909270v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-43 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of May, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of May, 2022.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-44

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE

REPORT OF THE ENGINEER REGARDING THE

PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED AS

ZONE EE AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF

ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), did by previous resolution order the City Engineer, or the City Engineer’s designee, to prepare and file a written report in accordance with the Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution in connection with the proposed annexation of territory to City of Jurupa Valley Lighting District No. 89-1-Consolidated as ZONE EE and the levy and collection of assessments against lots and parcels of land within City of Jurupa Valley Lighting District No. 89-1-Consolidated for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024.

Section 2. The Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council such report entitled "Engineer’s Report for City of Jurupa Valley Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Distri ct No. 89 -1-Consolidated, ZONE EE, Troy Court Industrial" (the "Report").

Section 3. The City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Report, and the Report is hereby approved as filed.

Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of May, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

-2-

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-44 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of May, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of May, 2022.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-45

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED AS

ZONE EE AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF
DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND

HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND APPOINTING A

TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") and as provided by Article XIII D of the California Constitution, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, by previous Resolution, has initiated proceedings for the annexation of territory described below in Section 4 of this Resolution to City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (hereinafter referred to as the "District") as ZONE EE, and the levy and collection of assessments against the lots and parcels of land within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024 to pay for the costs and expenses of the improvements described below in Section 6 of this Resolution.

Section 2. The Engineer selected by the City Council has prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council a report in connection with the proposed annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of assessments against the lots and parcels of land within suc h territory for fiscal year 2023-2024, and the City Council did by previous Resolution approve such report.

Section 3 . The City Council hereby declares its intention to order the annexation of territory described below in Section 4 of this Resolution to the District and to levy and col lect assessments against the lots and parcels of land within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024 to pay for the costs of the improvements described below in Section 6 of this Resolution. The Council hereby determines that the public interest requires this annexation to the District and levy and collection of assessments.

Section 4. The territory proposed to be annexed to the District includes three (3) parcels identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 167-110-035, 167 -110-036, and 167 -110-037, located on the west side of Troy Court, south of Galena Street . Such territory is shown on a map on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection.

-2-

Section 5. After the proposed territory is annexed to the District, the District shall continue to be designated as City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated.

Section 6. The proposed improvements are briefly described as follows: The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation within the public right-of-way parkway landscaped area identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for this Zone; the installation or construc tion of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris; the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities; the design, furnishing, construction, and installation of landscaping and irrigation improvements to meet the City’s current standards for L&LMD; and the maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing

Section 7. Lots or parcels of land within the District that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local governmental entity, the State of California, or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements.

Section 8. Reference is hereby made to the report of the Engineer entitled " Engineer’s Report for City of Jurupa Valley Landscape & Lighting Maintenance District 89-1-Consolidated, ZONE EE, Troy Court Industrial" on file with the City Clerk for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed to the District, the boundaries of the existing District and the zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the territory proposed to be annexed to the District.

Section 9. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2022, AT 7:00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER AT 8930 LIMONITE

AVENUE, JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR

A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE QUESTION OF THE

ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT DESCRIBED ABOVE IN SECTION 4 OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE DISTRICT AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 AGAINST THE LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY. All interested persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard.

Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of such hearing as provided by law by causing a notice of the public hearing and an assessment ballot to be mailed by first class mail to the record owners of the parcels in the territory proposed to be annexed to the District no less than 45 days before the date of the public hearing.

Section 1 1. The City Council hereby designates Victoria Wasko , City Clerk , 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California , (951) 332-6464 to answer inquiries regarding the hearing, protest proceedings, and procedural or technical matters.

-3-

Section 12. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 19th day of May, 2022.

Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
ss. CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that t he foregoing Resolution No. 2022-45 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 19th day of May, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 19th day of May, 2022.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

0 | P a g e

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 MAY 2022

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE EE

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL
Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

1 | P a g e

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT ....................................................................................................... 6 LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE ..................................................................................................... 6 PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE ............ 7 LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 7 PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 8 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 8 COST ESTIMATE ......................................................................................................................................... 9 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM.............................................................................................................. 12 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 13

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) AS ZONE EE
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

Pursuant to the direction from the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (“City Council”), California, this Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is prepared and hereby submitted for the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) in compliance with the provisions of Section 22565 through 22574 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), said Act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

This Report provides for the annexation of a portion of TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL to City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89-1-C as ZONE EE and establishes the Maximum Assessment to be levied in the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 (2022-2023) and continuing in all subsequent Fiscal Years, for this area to be known and designated as:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL
I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefor and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the 1972 Act, do hereby submit the following:

Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zone, as well as the boundaries of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and Assessment Roll, correspond with the n umbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessor Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
3 | P a g e

As of the date of this Report, there are no parcels or lots within ZONE EE that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

May 19, 2022.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For pa rticulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein. On this 19th day of Ma y, 2022 the City Council, City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, ordering the preparation of the Report pro viding for th e annexation of a portion of TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL to L&LMD No. 89 -1-C as ZONE EE did, pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Act, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2022-XX for a special assessment district zone known and designated as:

ZONE EE

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL
The annexation of ZONE EE includes the parcels of land within the development known as TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL. As of the date of this report, the zone contains five assessable parcels; also identified by the Assessor Parcel Number(s) 167-110-035, 167 -110-036, and 167 -110-037. As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zon e, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The following report presents the engineering analysis for the annexation of ZONE EE and the establishment of the Maximum Assessment to be levied and collected commencing Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and all subsequent fiscal years.

DEFINITIONS
Agency – Means the local government, City of Jurupa Valley.

Capital cost – Means the cost of acquisition, installation, construction, reconstruction, or replacement of a permanent public improvement by the Agency.

District – Means an area determined by the Agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement of property-related service.

Maintenance and operation expenses - Means the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement.
5 | P a g e

Ad Valorem Reduction – The corresponding general benefit value of the improvements.

Special benefit – Means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”

6 | P a g e

PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT

LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE

ZONE EE shall consist of a benefit zone encompassing the properties within the development known as TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL . The proposed improvements described in this Report are based on current development and improvement plans provided as of the date of this Report.

ZONE EE is generally located south of Galena Street along the west side of Troy Court, in the City of Jurupa Valley, in the County of Riverside, State of California. At the time of this assessment, the assessment zone consists of 3 assessable (legal) parcels and zero non-assessable parcels. ZONE EE consists of all lots/units, parcels, and subdivisions of land located in the following development area:

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL– Assessor Parcel Numbers as of date of this Report: 167-110-035, 167-110- 036, and 167-110-037.
7 | P a g e

PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE

The services to be funded by City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89 -1-C ZONE EE include the landscape maintenance within development designated as TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL. The proposed improvements, the associated costs, and assessments have been carefully reviewed, identified, and allocated based on:
a. Level of Service
b. Improvement Types
c. Proximity to Improvement
d. Levels of Special Benefit from Zone (on Public versus Private) The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant fac ilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lot(s) or parcel(s) of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than by assessed value.

It was determined that the improvements identified by this report will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within ZONE EE. The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the existing district as well as provide for annual maintenance of those improvements and the assessment revenues generated by the Zone will be used solely for such purpose.

LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS
The assessment will provide for l andscaping servicing and maintenance on public right -of-way and as approved by the City during the project approval. The following apply:

1. Servicing: the furnishing of water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any other improvements.

2. Maintenance: the furnishing of se rvices and materials for the ord inary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including the repair, removal, or replacement o f all of part of landscape improvements. Maintenance shall also include tree trimming for the trees identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for ZONE EE.

The benefits associated with landscaping improvements include:

1. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire protection.

2. Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties through well-maintained surrounding and amenities.

3. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuation noise.
8 | P a g e

PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION
The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the ZONE EE to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

The landscaping and streetlight improvements within ZONE EE provide direct and special benefit to the lots or parcels within the Zone. Therefore, the maintenance of these improvements also provides direct and special benefit by maintaining the functionality of the improvements and allowing the improvements to operate in a proper manner.

Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all (any) parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the maintenance and servicing of landscaping and streetlight are apportioned on a per parcel basis.

The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the Zone and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. A portion of the total maintenance costs for the landscaping and streetlights, if any, associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the Zone, but will be paid from other City of Jurupa Valley funds.

No property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property. Additionally, because the benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use , it is determined that each of the parcels within the Zone benefit equally form the improvements. Therefore, the proportionate share of the costs and expenses for the provisions of landscaping, as well as costs and expenses for the maintenance of the landscaping, are apportioned equally on a per parcel basis.

MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The following methodology was adopted by City Council in Resolution No. 2016 -01 dated February 4, 2016. Such methodology has been maintained in preparation of this Report. The purpose of establishing a Maximum Assessment formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustments to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which would add to the ZONE Y costs and assessments.

The Maximum Assessment formula shall be applied to all assessable parcels of land within the Zone. For ZONE EE, the initial Maximum Assessment(s) for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 are as follows:

1. The initial Total Maximum Assessment established within ZONE EE shall be $5,100.

2. The initial Maximum Assessment per assessable parcel, established within ZONE EE is anticipated to be $1,700.

The initial Maximum Assessment is subject to an annual inflator starting in Fiscal Year 2023-2024. The initial Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative 9 | P a g e

percentage increase in the CPI -U Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.

The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of ZONE EE’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. The proposed annual assessment (rate per assessable parcel) applied in any fiscal year is not considered to be an increased assessment if less than or equal to the Maximum Assessment amount. In no case shall the annual assessment exceed the Maximum Assessment.

Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual ZONE EE assessments may remain virtually unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish reasonable limits on ZONE EE assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase of the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjusted maximum amount. If the budget and assessments for the fiscal year require an increase and the incre ase is more than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, it is considered an increased assessment.

To impose an increase assessment, the City of Jurupa Valley must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D Section 4c, that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owner through the balloting process must approve the proposed assessment increase. If the proposed assessment is ap proved, then a new Maximum Assessment is established for ZONE EE. If the proposed assessment is not approve d, the City may not levy an assessment greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment previously established for ZONE EE.

COST ESTIMATE
The Ad Valorem reduction is the corresponding general benefit value of the improvements, and it is determined by identifying the general public benefit from the installation and upkeep of the improvements identified on this report. All proposed landscape, water quality improvements, and lighting improvements contained within this report are located directly in front of the assessed zone and the construction and installation of the improvements were only necessary for the development of properties within the Zone. Therefore, it was determined that any public access or use of these local improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the one or to the public at large. The Ad Valorem reduction for this assessment is zero.

10 | P a g e

The Assessment for each assessable parcel within ZONE EE is calculated by dividing the total Annual Balance to Levy minus the Ad Valorem Reduction by the total number of assessable subdivided parcels within ZONE EE to determine the Annual Assessment per assessable parcel.

𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝐿𝑒𝑣𝑦 − 𝐴𝑑 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑅𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑠 = 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑙 The Annual Balance to Levy is the Total Annual Landscaping Costs plus the Total Annual Streetlight Costs as seen in the following summary table:

11 | P a g e

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE

WHEELERS UPFITTER
FY 2022-2023

Total Assessable Parcels: 3
Cost Description Total Cost for
Zone EE
Cost per Parcel
for Zone EE
Landscaping:

Annual Landscaping Maintenance: $935 $312
Tree Trimming : $1,000 $334
Water (including water meter) $1,170 $390
Fertilizer Injector $220 $73.33
Electricity (including electric meter) $300 $100
Mulch : $137 $45.67
Calsense Single: $250 $83.33
Backflow Certificate : $50 $16.67
Graffiti Abatement: $5 $1.67
TOTAL ANNUAL LANDSCAPING COSTS : $4,067 $1,356

Streetlighting:

Streetlights LED N/A N/A
TOTAL ANNUAL STREETLIGHTING COSTS : N/A N/A

ADMINISTRATION (8.5%) $346 $116
INSPECTION (5%) $204 $68
OPERATING RESERVE (10%) $407 $136

TOTAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT: *$5,100 *$1,700
*Rounded to nearest hundred dollar
INITIAL MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER ASSESSABLE PARCEL : $1,700

12 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
(See next page)

13 | P a g e

14 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

Parcel identification for each parcel within ZONE EE shall be the parcels as shown on the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps.

ZONE EE includes the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) as of the date of this Report: 167-110- 035, 167-110-036, and 167-110-037.

The initial Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted annually by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U for All Items Index published by the BLS.

There are five legal lots within the boundary with seven identified Assessor’s parcels. The initial Maximum Assessments per assessable parcel for ZONE EE are as follows:

APN
(as of date of this report)
Maximum Assessment
167-110-035 $1,700
167-110-036 $1,700
167-110-037 $1,700

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 19, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.F

AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT TO ALL AMERICAN
ASPHALT, INC. FOR THE MISSION BOULEVARD PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION – PHASE II , CIP #21103, FROM BELLEGRAVE

AVENUE TO PYRITE STREET IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council approve and award a construction agreement to All American Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of $1,681,476.50 for the Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Phase II , CIP #21103 from Bell egrave to Pyrite (“Agreement”), for the work included in its bid proposal and a uthorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney; and

2. Approve a 10% contingency in the amount of $168,147.65 and authorize the City Manager to execute contract change orders not to exceed the total contract amount, pursuant to requirements set forth in the Agreement; and

3. Re-appropriate $ 89,000.00 of Gas Tax funds for the City’s On Call Pavement Repair Services, Account No. 54153, to the Project account; and

4. Re-appropriate $116,000.00 of Gas Tax funds from the City’s On Call Striping, Account No. 54151, to the Project account; and

5. Authorize the City Manager to record the Notice of Complet ion upon acceptance of the work by the City Engineer.

BACKGROUND
At its regular meeting on June 17, 2021, t he City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2021/22 through 2025/26 Capital Improvement Project (“CIP”). The CIP included Mission Boulevard pavement rehabilitation Phase II, CIP #21103 from Bell egrave Avenue to

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

Pyrite Street. The project will provide approximately 450,000 square feet of pavement rehabilitation on Mission Boulevard.

The scope of work includes grinding and overlaying the street, and rec onstructing the curb and gutter, sidewalk, and driveway approach. The road will be paved with rubberized asphalt pavement and will adjust the manholes and water valves to grade and striping.

HR Green, Inc. prepared the bid package for the project and the City Engineer approved the bid package on April 6, 2022.

The Notice Inviting Bids was published in The Press Enterprise newspaper on April 6, 2022, and April 13, 2022. The bid package was also uploaded to Planetbids, a web based procurement and bidding system.

ANALYSIS
Formal bidding procedures were followed in conformance with the Public Contract Code.

Four (4) bids were received and the Purchasing Manager opened bids soon aft er 3:00 p.m. with the following results:

Bidder Total Amount

1. All American Asphalt $1,681,476.50

2. Onyx Paving $1,776,000.00

3. R J Noble $1,780,390.00

4. Hardy & Harper $2,013,570.00

All bids were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. All American Asphalt , Inc. is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with a bid in the amount $1,681,476.50. The engineer’s estimate for the project is $1,500,000.00.

City Public Works/Engineering Department Staff will provide Construction Management and inspection services, which includes monitoring compliance with contract documents including temporary construction traffic control, preparation of monthly progress payment reports and various administrative activities related to the project.

OTHER INFORMATION
The project was evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined to be exempt as it is a maintenance project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total approved CIP Project Budget for the Mission Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase II, CIP #21103 is $1,700,000. The anticipated project cost is $ 1,916,000.00, which includes the 10% contingency to cover unforeseen field conditions as well as the Engineering testing materials. The project is funded by RMRA Page | 3

and Measure “A” funds . The budgeted funds are not sufficient to cover the total project costs. Approval of this Agreement requires that the City Council re-appropriate Gas Tax funds.

The total project costs are as follows:

Project Administration/Bid Package Preparation $51,000.00 Construction Contract $1,681,476.50
Contingency (10%) $168,147.65
Construction Support Services $15,000
Total ≈ $1,916,000.00

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve Agreement and related actions.

2. Provide alternative direction to Staff.

************************ SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *************************

MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, BELLEGRAVE TO PYRITE Attachment B
Project No. 21103
Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MAY 19, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: TIM JONASSON, SENIOR MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER (1) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND
CHAPTER 3.75 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY THE METHOD

USED FOR CALCULATING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR

RETAIL/SERVICE/OFFICE, BUSINESS PARK , INDUSTRIAL, AND

RESIDENTIAL USES AND COMMERCIAL LODGING AND MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENTS, AND (2) A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS,

AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA (CONTINUED FROM THE MAY 5, 2022 MEETING)

RECOMMENDATION

1. Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing and consider any public testimony;

2. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2022- 08, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, AMENDING CHAPTER

3.75 (DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL

CODE TO CLARIFY THAT THE METHOD FOR CALCULATING

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR RETAIL/SERVICE/OFFICE, BUSINESS

PARK, AND INDUSTRIAL USES SHALL BE BASED ON THE SQUARE

FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING, AND TO CLARIFY THAT FEES FOR

RESIDENTIAL USES AND COMMERCIAL LODGING ARE CALCULATED

BASED ON A PER UNIT BASIS AND THAT FEES FOR MIXED USE

DEVELOPMENTS ARE BASED ON THE COMBINATION OF THE LAND USES, MAKING CONFORMING REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 3.75, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) AND 15273(A)(4) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT;

3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-34, entitled:

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING

UNITS, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15061(B)(3) AND 15273(A)(4) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES

BACKGROUND
On January 21, 202 1, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -02 approving the “Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Jurupa Valley” (“Nexus Report”) and the “Master Faci lities Plan” referenced therein. Resolution No. 2021-02 also approved the method and rate for calculating DIF . On February 4, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2021 -02 amending Chapter 3.75 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code (“Municipal Code”) pertaining to DIF based on the Nexus Report.

Staff subsequently determined there were some ambiguities and inconsistencies between Resolution No. 2021-02, Ordinance No. 2021-02 and the Nexus Report. Staff is proposing some amendments to Ch apter 3.75 of the Municipal Code , consistent with the adopted Nexus Report, to provide that the method for calculating development impact fees for retail/service/office, business park and industrial uses shall be based on square footage of the building, an d clarifying that fees for residential uses and commercial lodging are calculated based on a per unit basis and fees for mixed used developments are based on the combination of the land uses, and also making other conforming revisions to Chapter 3.75. These changes are consistent with Resolution No. 2021 -02 and are in effect because Section 3.75.070 of the Municipal Code provides that “ The amount of the DIF, the description of the facilities and equipment to be financed by DIF, definitions of terms necessa ry to implement the DIF, and such other regulations as may be necessary or convenient to implement and administer the DIF to be imposed pursuant to this chapter shall be established by resolution of the city council.” In addition, Resolution No. 2021-02 did not expressly account for ADUs and the rate and method for calculating DIF for ADUs. Staff is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing DIF for ADUs.

ANALYSIS
A. Ordinance No. 2022-08 - Amendments to Chapter 3.75
Amendments are proposed to Section 3.75.060 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code (“Municipal Code”) to amend the definitions of the DIF Chapter to be consistent with the definitions contained in the Nexus Report. For example, the Nexus Report makes a distinction between Low Density Detached Dwellings, Medium Density Detached Dwellings and Attached Dwellings . However, Section 3.75.060 currently contains definitions for single family residential units and multifamily residential units.

Amendments are also proposed to add a definition for Commercial Lodging (keyed) Units and Business Park Uses, consistent with the definitions contained in the Nexus Report.

Definitions will also be added to address ADUs.

Page | 3

The Nexus Report and Resolution No. 2021 -02 provide that the method for calculating DIF for retail/service/office, business park and industrial uses shall be based on the square footage of the building. Specifically, the Nexus Report provides that “fees are calculated on square footage of building space basis for busi ness (retail/service, office and industrial, etc.) parcels to reflect the impacts of different building intensities for these types of de velopment.” See page 6 of Nexus Report. The rationale is that a 10,000 square foot industrial building constructed on a 15,000 square foot parcel would have a greater impact than a 5,000 square foot industrial building constructed on a 20,000 square foot parcel. So the method of calculating DIF should be based on building size and not the parcel size. Amendments to Section 3.75.110 of the Municipal Code are proposed to clarify that for retail/service, office, business park and industrial uses, the DIF is calculated based on the square footage of the building and not the acreage of the parcel.

Similarly, the Nexus Report and Resolution No. 2021 -02 provide that the method for calculating DIF for residential uses and commercial lodging is on a per dwelling unit/unit basis. Amendments to Section 3.75.110 of the Municipal Code are proposed to expressly state this as Chapter 3.75 is currently silent on how these fees are calculated.

Amendments to Section 3.75.1 10 of the Municipal Code are proposed to account for mixed-use developments. The Nexus Report states that “Should any mixed use facilities be approved for construction . . . then the DIF would be based upon the combination of the above land -use DIF. For example, for a mixed use development consist ing of a Commercial Retail (CR) and Very High Density Residential (VHDR) project, the DIF would consist of the combination of the number of square feet of Commercial/Retail/Service/Office and the number of attached dwellings included in the mix-use.” See page 16 of Nexus Report. The amendment are proposed to specify how DIF for mixed-use developments will be calculated.

Additionally, the proposed Ordinance amends Section 3.75.130 to remove exemptions for additions to existing commercial or industrial buildings because DIF is currently applied to the square -footage of building area . Prior to the adoption of the nexus study and latest fee schedule, DIF was charged to the acreage of the project area. The exemption for additions to existing residential units remain in place as the DIF is charged per unit.

Finally, the proposed Ordinance proposes to amend Municipal Code Section 3.75.130 to provide that as dictated by State law, ADUs that are less than 750 square feet in size are exempt from payment of DIF.

B. Resolution No. 2022-34 - a Resolution Establishing DIF for ADUs Resolution No . 2022 -34 seeks to clarify the DIF that will be imposed on ADUs.

Government Code section 65852.2(f)(1) provides that a local agency shall not impose any impact fee upon the development of an ADU that is less than 750 square feet.

Moreover, any impact fees charged for an ADU that is 750 square feet or more shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling un it.

Page | 4

Accordingly, Resolution No. 2022 -34 provides that ADUs that are less than 750 square feet in size are exempt from the payment of DIF.

1. ADU on lot with single-family residence
ADUs that are located on a parcel with a single family residence will be charged an impact fee at the rate charged for a Low Densi ty Detached Dwelling ($5,500 per unit), proportionate to the square footage of the primary dwelling. For example, if a proposed 1,000 square foot detached ADU is to be constructed on the same parcel as a 2,000 square foot primary dwelling unit the DIF would be paid as follows:

Size of ADU in SF 1,000
Size of Primary Dwelling Unit in SF 2,000
Ratio of ADU SF to Primary Unit SF 50.0%
Impact Fee for Low Density Detached Dwelling
Units Dwelling Units $5,500
ADU Impact Fee $2,750

2. ADU on lot with multi-family residence
ADUs that are located on a parcel with a multi-family residence will be charged an impact fee at the rate charged for a n Attached Dwelling ($3,292 per unit), proportionate to the square footage of the primary dwelling. For example, a proposed 1,000 square foot ADU to be attached to a 2,000 square foot primary dwelling unit would pay DIF as follows:

Size of Attached ADU in SF 1,000
Size of Primary Dwelling Unit in SF 2,000
Ratio of ADU SF to Primary Dwelling Unit SF 50.0%
Attached Dwelling Impact Fee $3,292
Attached ADU Impact Fee $1,646
CEQA
Staff reviewed Ordinance No. 2022 -08 and Resolution No. 2022-34, in accordance with the criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the State CEQA Guidelines. Staff finds that adoption of the ordinance will not have a significant impact on the environment and is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of State CEQA Guidelines . Amendments to Chapter 3.75 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code pertain to the method of calculating DIF and do not approve any actual development

Page | 6

Attachments:
1) Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report dated May 2020
2) Ordinance No. 2022 -08, clarifying the Method for Calculation Development Impact Fees
3) Resolution No. 2022 -34, adopting a Development Impact Fee for Accessory Dwelling Units
Development Impact Fee
Calculation and Nexus Report
For the City of
Jurupa Valley, California
May, 2020
evenue
ost
pecialists, LLC
Serving Local Governments Since 1975
May 29, 2020
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Via Mr. Rod Butler, City Manager
City of Jurupa Valley - City Hall
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
RE: 2019-20 Development Impact Fee (DIFs) Calculation and Nexus Report Honorable Mayor, Council and City Manager Butler:

The City of Jurupa Valley was incorporated in March of 2011. Since that time the City has relied upon the County's existing but increasingly irrelevant Development Impact Fee schedule.

Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C., was contracted to provide the technical expertise and assistance to staff in the identification of capital projects and other necessary capital acquisitions.

These capital additions are necessary in order to accommodate the extraordinary service demands generated from continued development. The capital acquisitions also act to preserve the existing Levels of Service (LOS) currently offered to and enjoyed by the existing community from the diminution of those existing LOS due to that same addition of new residential/business development. The proposed projects identified in this document and detailed in the companion Master Facilities Document (henceforth MFP), serve as the basis of the calculation of a schedule of development impact fees (henceforth DIFs) for all City infrastructure with which to finance the proportional share of development-generated capital needs.

City Council and staff, responsible for providing municipal services to a continually expanding residential and business community, must recognize that the magnitude of the DIFs is a direct function of the $838.1 million cost of the Level of Service protecting capital projects identified in the MFP. There is $137.1 million in development-generated project costs that can be financed with impact fee receipts. Approximately $618.0 million of the $838.1 million in projects have other revenue sources, or simply do not qualify for DIF financing. Existing DIF fund balances will finance approximately $6.9 million of the total projects. Unfortunately, there is a $76.1 million shortfall in full proposed project financing.

The following DIF Report calculates the Jurupa Valley specific DIFs based on the aforementioned reasons and the City's recently established General Plan and its effect upon requirements for public safety, circulation, storm drainage collection, general facilities and the quality of life facilities (public use facilities, parks etc.). The adoption of the DIFs will enable this City Council, as well as succeeding Councils, to continue to ensure that the City will be able to meet the basic infrastructure needs of new growth, without unduly burdening the existing population and business community for these development-generated capital costs. Adoption of the maximum DIFs contained herein and imposition upon the remaining development opportunities in Jurupa Valley would generate approximately $137.1 million in a combination of public improvement dedications and revenues limited for use on the many development generated capital expansion projects. Police service and public use facilities (community centers) projects have not been included, nor cost estimated, as they are fully provided by other agencies (JAPRD) or by an expandable contract (the Riverside Sheriff's Office).

Internet: www.revenuecost.com
Voice 714.992.9020 1519 E. Chapman Avenue • Suite C • Fullerton, CA 92831