Agenda — Jurupa Valley City Council, July 7, 2022 (part 2 of 3)

Section 7.

Implementation of Countermeasures

This penultimate step of the safety plan is determining and implementing the identification of specific projects and their priority for implementation of each project, or subsequently additional or modified projects.

Prioritization Strategy

The prioritization of the projects and initiatives identified in this report will be developed through a multi-tasked approach. Some initiatives will be implemented through changes to policies and standards along with regular reporting mechanisms. Others will be through programmed cap ital projects and companion efforts with area development and redevelopment projects. Yet others will be via grant -funded opportunities and can be advanced as funding is provided. Development of the Jurupa Valley LRSP qualifies the city for eligibility to receive Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding for roadway safety infrastructure at signalized intersections, non -signalized intersections, and roadway segments. Up to 90% of project costs for preliminary engineering (PE), right-of-way (ROW), and construction (CON) phases would be awarded for BCR applications and between $250,000 and $1 million would be available for each set-aside funding category: guardrail upgrades, pedestrian crossing enhancements, installing edgelines, and bicycle safety improvements.

Through the collision data, and statistical evidence (e.g. RCSD incident reports, and an expectation of higher traffic volume locations) staff ca n identify where our safety stakeholders can focus implementation of safety countermeasures in engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services.

Recommended Projects Incorporating Proven Countermeasures

Based on the strategies for the emphasis areas and the countermeasures listed in the previous sections, the projects/efforts listed in Table 10 are recommended to reduce collisions and provide for safer streets for all users.

The timing and priority of these projects will be determined based on the availability of implementation funding, opportunities to combine activities with new development and/or other capital projects, and the regular review of the plan’s effectiveness.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Page 41 ends

Capital Improvement Projects

The City of Jurupa Valley Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has many upcoming projects that aim to improve public safety on its road infrastructure network. Some of these projects either include or have the potential to include traffic safety devices and proven countermeasures to assist in addressing the issues identified in the previous report sections. A copy of the current CIP infrastructure program is included in the Appendix.

Key CIP and development -related projects that implement various street improvements and countermeasures include the following:

CIP Projects
Market Street Bridge Replacement
Replace the Santa Ana River bridge and widen Market Street to four lanes plus left turn lanes from north of Rivera Street in Riverside to north of 24 th Street/Via Cerro. Provide wider shoulders and a pedestrian walkway.

Mission Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Replace the bridge over the Santa Ana River east of Crestmore Road and add a Class IV cycle track to the south side of the bridge and provide raised median.

HSIP Citywide Fiber Optic and Reflective Border Signal Backing Plate Modification Project Develop citywide fiber optic interconnect between traffic signals to allow for adaptive traffic signal interconnect and add reflective border traffic signal backing plates on all traffic signals.

HSIP Citywide Guardrail Upgrade Project
Replace out-of-date existing guardrails in various locations within t he city with current Caltrans standard Midwest Guardrail Design sections and attenuators.

Development Projects
Rubidoux Boulevard and 20th Street/Market Street Intersection Modification Add second turn lanes, remove freeflow right-turn lane, and remove median -mounted traffic signal poles and setback corner poles to reduce roadside hazards.

High Visibility Crosswalk Installation
As a requirement for various development project significant impacts existing crosswalks will be replaced with ladder-type high visibility striping and pedestrian-actuated flashers at select locations.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Page 42 ends

Rubidoux Boulevard Guardrail Project
The CalPortland Company is contributing to a project to install new guardrail along the east side of Rubidoux Boulevard between Production Circle and Castellano Road. The city will partner with CalPortland to complete the project.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Page 43 ends

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion

PROGRAMS / STANDARDS
CATEGORY: SPEED MANAGEMENT
Appropriate Speed Limits for All Users – Identify locations where reduced speed limits may be warranted based on collision data or other appropriate metrics per AB 43.

Citywide
In 2014, the city reduced the speed limits on about 68% of surveyed (non-local) streets by 5 miles per hour. In 2021, AB 43 changed the rules for how speed limits are set in California. However, the rule changes do not take effect until June 2024 or until the Judicial Council completes additional steps.

Review residential neighborhood locations for radar speed feedback signs at selected locations. Citywide Prepare guidelines for analyzing the conditions suitable for the placement of speed feedback cameras to use in evaluating locations on the city street system to install speed feedback signs where speeding is an issue.

Install traffic calming measures on Local Streets in new development and on selected Neighborhood Collector streets. Residential neighborhoods In neighborhoods where there is curb and gutters installed, review options for installing traffic calming devices to slow traffic on selected neighborhood collector streets and those with a documented history of speeding problems.

Reduce the standard Local Street width from 40 feet to no more than 36 feet, unless there will be Class II bike lanes provided. Local Streets The city’s typical local street cross-section is a 40-foot wide street in a 60-foot right-of-way. The wider street cross- section encourages speeding even when there is on-street parking present. Local Street standard cross-sections should be reduced to no more than 36 feet wide regardless of the right-of-way width unless Class II bike lanes are being included. Develop design standards that incorporate Complete Streets criteria and components to accommodate all potential users of the right-of-way.

Reduce Collector and Arterial Street through lane widths to 11 feet wide.

Reduce select left-turn lanes to 10 feet if a raised median is installed and limited truck traffic is expected.

New development
Reducing lane widths will assist in reducing traffic speeds, will reduce crossing widths for pedestrians at intersections, and will reduce the amount of impermeable roadway surface and runoff. Narrower streets will also allow for wider runoff areas to create additional recovery area.

Reduce travel lanes by adding buffered bike lanes on Master Plan identified corridors.

Streets identified in the Citywide Master
Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Reduce travel lane widths and stripe bike lanes on streets identified in the Bicycle and pedestrian master plan. On Camino Real between Jurupa Road and Limonite Avenue study the option to install a road diet and reduce the 4-lane cross-section to a 3-lane cross-section with bike lanes.

CATEGORY: ROADWAY DEPARTURE
Wider Edge Lines Citywide
Develop citywide striping and marking standards using 6” lines for regular line work and 8” line for wide lines. Establish when to use thermoplastic materials and when to use water-based paint. Establish standard markings for bike lanes and crosswalks. Install wider lines with all new and maintenance restriping.

Enhanced Delineation for Horizontal Curves Citywide Add W8-1 chevron signs to curves where there is either demonstrated roadway departure incidents or engineer’s review of a documented design issue or roadside hazard. Add full-length pole reflective covers to all curve warning signs.

Longitudinal Rumble Strips and Stripes Citywide
Review rural streets with limited lighting for the application of edge line rumble strips. Apply to streets with a history of run off the road collisions. Priority application to those streets with a posted speed of 45 miles per hour or higher.

Install 6” edge lines on streets with a posted speed of over 40 miles per hour with limited street lighting.

Roadway SafetyEdge Citywide
On all streets with no curb and gutter and a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour and above install an FHWA SafetyEdge during all reconstruction and resurfacing projects and include with any new development where no curb and gutter, dike, or berm will be installed.

Roadside Design Improvements Citywide
Remove unnecessary roadside features (signs, furniture, fixed landscaping, etc.) and relocate others farther from the travel lanes to improve clear zones. Locate/relocate all new and replacement traffic signal, flasher, and street light poles farther from the travel lane when possible to limit the potential for vehicle strikes, especially by trucks.

Median Barriers Citywide Install raised medians on major and arterial streets to limit turning activity to select controlled locations, reduce left-turn conflicts, and limit mid-block pedestrian crossings.

CATEGORY: INTERSECTIONS
Traffic Signal Backplates with reflective borders Citywide Replace all traffic signal backing plates with reflective yellow perimeter plates to enhance signal visibility.

Corridor Access Management Citywide
Consolidate development driveways where possible and install raised medians with spaced left-turn/U-turn locations to reduce turning movement conflicts. Have developments access directly onto side streets instead of arterials to reduce turning movement conflicts at driveways.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Page 44 ends

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion Roundabouts Citywide
Install mini roundabouts along neighborhood collector streets to reduce travel speeds and eliminate stop sign violations.

Identify locations along two-lane collector and secondary streets for the placement of roundabouts in lieu of traffic signals or all-way stop sign control.

Yellow Change and All-Red Intervals Signalized intersections Evaluate all traffic signals to ensure that appropriate yellow and all-red intervals are in place. Identify locations where the installation of yellow or red time extensions would reduce yellow and red light running.

CATEGORY: PEDESTRIANS / BICYCLES
Crosswalk Visibility Enhancements Intersections Prepare citywide standards for crosswalk design and placement. Prepare an annual plan for crosswalk replacement with high a visibility design.

Bicycle Lanes Locations identified in the Bicycle and
pedestrian master plan
Install bike lanes per the city’s bicycle and pedestrian master plan and allocate an annual budget to install new bike lanes. Develop standards for installing bicycle facilities as part of all development and CIP projects. Create a bicycle facilities capital fund for development impact contributions that will support bicycle facilities development.

Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) Select uncontrolled crosswalks Identify locations that would be suitable for the installation of RRFBs and identify funding programs. Locations would concentrate on Safe Route to School corridors and access to parks and community facilities.

Leading Pedestrian Intervals Signalized intersections with regular pedestrian activity
At all traffic signals where there is regular pedestrian activity install leading pedestrian intervals to all pedestrians to begin crossing the street before the associated vehicle approach is released.

Medians and Pedestrian Refuge Islands Locations with regular pedestrian crossing activity
Identify locations with regular pedestrian activity where pedestrians must either cross more than four total lanes (through and turning) or at midblock locations where pedestrians may be crossing at a slower pace and review for the installation of median refuge islands to reduce the unprotected crossing distance for pedestrians.

Road Diets / Roadway Reconfiguration Select four-lane streets with traffic volumes not requiring four lanes
Road diets will reduce the street width without significantly the street capacity, especially when there are regular turning volumes at driveways or intersecting streets. Road diets will also reduce travel speeds, reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians, and can provide width needed to install bike lanes or buffers between travel lanes and parked vehicles.

Sidewalks / Walkways
Citywide per locations in the bicycle and
pedestrian master plan, all new
development, and safe route to school
corridors.

Develop an annual program for the installation of new sidewalk on streets, especially near schools, parks, and community facilities.

CATEGORY: CROSSCUTTING
Bi-Annual Road Safety Audit Citywide
Conduct a bi-annual safety audit of city streets to identify higher incident locations and potential in-fill locations for missing infrastructure. Coordinate with incoming and on-going development projects and identify public-private partnerships for to expedite safety improvements.

PROJECTS
CATEGORY: CORRIDORS
Install radar speed feedback signs
- Rubidoux Boulevard between: SR-60
and Mission Boulevard and between
24th Street and 30th Street
- Agate Street between Galena Street
and Mission Boulevard
- Tyrolite Street between Whitney Drive
and Mission Boulevard
Collision data, RCSD records, and Traffic Safety Committee proceedings have identified several corridors where excessive vehicle speeds are a regular issue. The installation of speed feedback signs along these corridors will assist in reminding drivers to watch their speed when traveling on these streets. In combination with other safety features and enforcement the signs will be part of a combined effort to improve safety and lower vehicle speeds.

Guardrails, edge line rumble strips, and wide edge line Rubidoux Boulevard between Production Circle and Castellano Road
This segment of Rubidoux Boulevard has had a regular history of run-off-the-road crashes over the years. As noted in the previous section, CalPortland Company has agreed to partner with the city on funding the installation of guardrail along this section of Rubidoux Boulevard. In addition to the guardrail, the city should install wide edge lines and install outside shoulder rumble strips to alert drivers that they are straying from travel lane.

Install Road Diet to reduce existing four-lane section to three lanes with median left-turn lane.
- San Sevaine Way between Etiwanda
Avenue and Mission Boulevard
San Sevaine Way has a history of drivers exceeding the speed limit and street racing. The installation of a road diet would eliminate the ability of drivers to drive side-by-side and provide a median left-turn lane for vehicles turning into the driveways and side streets along San Sevaine Way.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Page 45 ends

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion - Camino Real between Whitney Drive
and Limonite Avenue
- Bellegrave Avenue between Etiwanda
Avenue and Bain Street
The section of Camino Real between Whitney Drive and limonite Avenue has four-lanes with no left-turn lane, but has residential driveways along its entire length. There are no sidewalks along much of Camino Real, even though it is regularly used by students waking to and from the area schools. The wide street regularly has speeding issues which creates a safety problem. The road diet would allow for the development of sidewalks along Camino Real and/or bike lanes to improve safety.

Bellegrave Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Bain Street has four lanes with no turn lanes. It also has a substantial volume of school-related traffic from Jurupa Valley High School. A road diet to reduce the street three lane along with the extension of Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Bellegrave Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue would divert most through traffic away from this segment of Bellegrave Avenue and improve both traffic and pedestrian safety.

Install traffic signals and restripe to a five-lane cross-section Rubidoux Boulevard between 20th Street and 30th Street
Rubidoux Boulevard between 20th Street and 28th Street is mostly striped as four lanes with side street stop control at 26th and 28th Streets. The installation of traffic signals at 24th and 26th Streets along with restriping the street to five lanes will allow for progressive traffic signal timings to be installed to control the speed and volume of traffic on the street and allow for turning traffic to not stop in the through lanes when waiting turn.

Install Bike Lanes Etiwanda Avenue between Limonite
Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue
Install the bike lanes on Etiwanda Avenue per the prepared engineered plan through lane width reductions and reductions in some on-street parking.

Prepare traffic signal coordination plans.
- Limonite Avenue between Camino Real
and Beach Street
- Rubidoux Boulevard between 20th
Street and Mission Boulevard
- Mission Boulevard between Crestmore
Road and Valley Way
Traffic signal progression can be used to control both corridor speeds and volumes by metering traffic through signalized intersections at a specific rate. These corridors have had various levels of traffic signal progression in the past. With the implementation of the citywide fiber optic project there will be more opportunity to implement adaptive traffic signal timings that can assist with moving traffic along streets at a safer and more efficient pace.

Install raised medians
- Mission Boulevard between Bellegrave
Avenue and San Sevaine Way
- Mission Boulevard between Valley Way
and Pedley Road
- Limonite Avenue between Pats Ranch
Road and Etiwanda Avenue
- Limonite Avenue between Etiwanda
Avenue and Corey Street
- Rubidoux Boulevard between El Rivino
Road and 24th Street
- Sierra Avenue from north of Karen
Lane to Woodbriar Drive
These corridors are all five-lane streets that would benefit from the provision of raised medians to both separate opposing flows of traffic, but also provide access control and limit turning movements to controlled locations reducing the potential for collisions. Some segments of these streets have existing raised medians and some sections are being improved as part of ongoing development projects. In intermediate segments where there is no project to install raised median, capital projects need to be identified to finalize the median infill. These median projects could be funded through development impact fees or partially through grant funding if combined with other safety elements.

CATEGORY: INTERSECTIONS
Install yellow reflective edge traffic signal backing plates All traffic signals Complete the HSIP Cycle 5 grant-funded project to install reflective yellow edge backing plates on all traffic signals heads.

Remove northbound left-turn lane at intersection. Van Buren Boulevard / 56th Street With the development of a new signal-controlled median opening on Van Buren Boulevard at 52nd Street there is no need to maintain the uncontrolled left-turn access at the Van Buren Boulevard and 56th Street intersection. The connection of 56th Street to Van Buren Boulevard can be retained as a right-in/right-out access with expanded deceleration and acceleration lanes, but the new 52nd Street intersection will provide a safer access location.

Install leading pedestrian interval at traffic signals. Mission Boulevard and Pedley Road and Mission Boulevard and Glen Street
To allow pedestrians to begin their crossing maneuver without vehicles beginning to start moving, install leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections that have regular pedestrian activity. The leading pedestrian interval will initiate a walk light for pedestrian a few moments before the adjacent through traffic is released. This will hold any conflicting turn traffic that would conflict with the pedestrian’s path until after the pedestrian has begun crossing.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Page 46 ends

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion Install adaptive traffic signal controls with yellow and red light extensions, leading pedestrian intervals, and larger mast arm signage Mission Boulevard between Crestmore
Road and Valley Way
The signalized intersections in this segment of Mission Boulevard have regular pedestrian activity along with increasing vehicle volumes. The adaptive traffic signal timings along with leading pedestrian intervals will allow the traffic signals to adapt to changing traffic volumes during the day. The yellow and red light extensions are programming tools that allow the traffic signals to extend yellow and all-red light intervals if it appears that a driver may not get through an intersection before the conflicting traffic is released. The larger signage will provide a clearer and more prominent message to drivers, especially aging drivers and those with poorer eyesight.

Install traffic signals and left-turn lanes Intersections of Rubidoux Boulevard with 24th Street and 26th Street
The installation of traffic signals along with striping left-turn lanes will allow for safer controlled turns at these intersections and allow for the implementation of progressive traffic signal timings that can be used to control speeds and meter traffic volumes along Rubidoux Boulevard.

Install mini roundabouts
- Intersection of Tyrolite Street and
Halbrook Terrace
- Intersection of Skyview Road and
Sharon Way
These intersections have been used in the past as test cases for the effectiveness of lane striping on controlling vehicle speeds. Both have shown that additional traffic calming measures are required and the installation of all-way stop sign control has led to drivers just running the stop signs due to low off-peak traffic volumes. Mini roundabouts will provide speed control along the street without requiring vehicle to stop. As test locations, the successful implantation of these devices would support the installation of mini roundabouts at other problematic local and collector streets in the city.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Page 47 ends

Section 8.

Evaluation & Plan Updates

This final step of the safety plan is determining and implementing the process that will be used to evaluate the success of the plan, ensure implementation, and determine when an update is needed. Following the implementation of projects and application of countermeasures, the city will evaluate the success of the LRS P strategies based on Section 7 “Evaluation of Improvements” of the Cal trans LRSM v1.6. A database will be developed to track countermeasure installations, crash history, and field assessments on an annual basis. Feedback from the public, safety partners, and city maintenance crews will be included to provide a comprehensive evaluation.

The city will continue to host meetings with stakeholders at least once a year to discuss implementation of the plan and strategies for each emphasis area.

• The plan will be evaluated every three years starting in 2025 to see how many goals have been reached or need to be adjusted.
• The plan-initiated projects will be evaluated for effectiveness five years after their implementation to determine their effectiveness.
• Every two years on opposite years as the application ye ar for HSIP grant applications the plan will be reviewed to ensure it is current for locations where grant funding will be requested.

This LRSP is a living document that is recommended to be updated on a regular basis in order to utilize the latest data a nd detect trends. Collision data can be used to evaluate the success of the plan. The Jurupa Valley Department of Public Works will be the primary department responsible for updating this LRSP and will host stakeholder meetings to discuss implementation of the plan and strategies for each emphasis area.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix

A. Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Intersections B. Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Midblock C. List of Proven Countermeasures
D. Jurupa Valley Capital Improvement Program List

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix A: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations - Intersections Rank
Intersection
Collisions
Rank
Intersection
Collisions
2016
1 58th Street at Dodd Street 1 6 Kim Lane at Pedley Road 1 2 Canal Street at Mission Boulevard 1 7 Limonite Avenue at Peralta Place 1 3 Cantu Galleano Ranch Road at I-15 NB Off-
Ramp 1 8 Mission Boulevard at Sikh Temple Way 1
4 Cantu Galleano Ranch Road at Wineville Road 1 9 Mission Boulevard at Pacific Avenue 1 5 Felspar Street at Mission Boulevard 1 10 Riverview Drive at Vista De Oro 1 2017
1 63rd Street at Archer Street 1 7 El Palomino Drive at Limonite Avenue 1 2 Avon Street at Galena Street 1 8 Eucalyptus Avenue at Limonite Avenue 1 3 Ben Nevis Boulevard at Pedley Road 1 9 Grapevine Street at Philadelphia Avenue 1 4 Camino Real at Limonite Avenue 1 10 Lakeside Drive at Live Oak Drive 1 5 Country Village Rd at Oak Leaf Way 1 11 Mission Boulevard at Valley Way 1 6 De La Vista at Riverview Drive (E) 1 12 SR-60 WB On-Ramp at Valley Way 1 2018
1 Bellegrave Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 2 10 Jurupa Road at Mission Boulevard 1 2 26th Street at Hall Avenue 1 11 Jurupa Road at Van Buren Boulevard 1 3 28th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 12 Limonite Avenue at Ridgeview Avenue 1 4 53rd Street at Beach Street 1 13 Limonite Avenue at Pats Ranch Road 1 5 56th Street at Van Buren Boulevard 1 14 Limonite Avenue at Peralta Place 1 6 Camino Montura at Union Street 1 15 Lindsay Street at Mission Boulevard 1 7 Clay Street at General Road 1 16 Mission Boulevard at Vernon Avenue 1 8 Clay Street at Limonite Avenue 1 17 Mountain Shadow Drive at Winncliff Drive 1 9 El Rio Avenue at Hall Avenue 1
2019
1 24th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 2 8 Limonite Avenue at Pats Ranch Road 1 2 30th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 9 Limonite Avenue at Lucretia Avenue 1 3 Archer Street at Limonite Avenue 1 10 Limonite Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 1 4 Bellegrave Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 1 11 Mission Boulevard at Pedley Road 1 5 Ben Nevis Boulevard at Mission Boulevard 1 12 Mission Boulevard at Opal Street 1 6 Etiwanda Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 1 13 Mission Boulevard at Twining Street 1 7 Jurupa Road at Van Buren Boulevard 1
2020
1 24th/Market Street at Via Cerro 2 10 Beach Street at Jurupa Road 1 2 Etiwanda Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 2 11 Camino Real at Limonite Av 1 3 20th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 12 Country Village Road at Wagon Way 1 4 26th Street at Hall Avenue 1 13 Etiwanda Avenue at Jurupa Road 1 5 34th Street at Daly Avenue 1 14 Galena Street at Kingsbridge Lane 1 6 36th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 15 Granite Hill Drive at Pyrite Street 1 7 53rd Street at Steve Avenue 1 16 Limonite Avenue at Ridgeview Avenue 1 8 56th Street at Van Buren Boulevard 1 17 Mission Boulevard at Pedley Road 1 9 Armstrong Road at Sierra Avenue 1 18 Studio Place at Van Buren Boulevard 1 Source: Riverside County Crossroads Database, 2022.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix B: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Midblock Rank
Intersection
Collisions
Rank
Intersection
Collisions
2016
1 Rubidoux Boulevard: Production Circle to
Castellano Road 2 9 Granite Hill Drive: Camino Real to Pyrite Street 1
2 Felspar Street: 59th Street to 61st Street 1 10 68th St: Holmes Avenue to Carnelian Street 1
3 Hall Avenue: 28th Street to SR-60 W 1 11 Limonite Avenue: Beach Street to Bain Street 1
4 Rubidoux Boulevard: 26th Street to 28th
Street 1 12 Limonite Avenue: Mann Avenue to
Etiwanda Avenue 1
5 Wallace Street: Hall Avenue to 34th Street 1 13 Limonite Avenue: Etiwanda Avenue to Lucretia Avenue 1
6 Rubidoux Boulevard: 28th Street to 29th
Street 1 14 Mission Boulevard: SR-60 WB On-ramp to
Island Avenue 1
7 Canal Street: Alta Street to La Rue Street 1 15 Limonite Avenue: Lucretia Avenue to Wineville Avenue 1
8 Riverview Drive: Vista De Oro to Limonite
Avenue 1 16 Pacific Avenue: Mission Boulevard to
Rustic Lane 1
2017
1 Van Buren Boulevard: Holladay Street to 56th
Street 1 11 Pedley Road: Bravo Estates to Ben Nevis
Boulevard 1
2 Rubidoux Boulevard: 26th Street to 28th
Street 1 12 Jurupa Road: Mizar Way to Eclipse Avenue 1 3 Mission Boulevard: End to Crestmore Rd 1 13 Van Buren Boulevard: 56th Street to Jurupa Road 1
4 Rubidoux Boulevard 36th Street to Wilcox
Square Alley 1 14 Van Buren Boulevard: Bellegrave Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue 1
5 Armstrong Road: Sierra Av to 30th Street 1 15 San Sevaine Way: RCFD Station 17 Driveway to Wacker Drive 1
6 Granite Hill Drive: Camino Real to Pyrite
Street 1 16 Philadelphia Avenue: Chardoney Way to
Grapevine Street 1
7 Live Oak Drive: Frazer Drive to Lakeside Drive 1 17 Troth Street: 48th Street to 50th Street 1 8 Camino Real: Parkland Club Drive to Limonite
Avenue 1 18 Troth Street: 54th Street to 56th Street 1 9 Mission Boulevard: Tyrolite Street to Pyrite
Street 1 19 Etiwanda Avenue: Iberia Street to SR-60
WB Off-ramp 1
10 Rubidoux Boulevard: Production Circle to
Castellano Road 1 20 Pedley Road: Kim Lane to Golondrina Street 1
2018
1 Limonite Avenue: Mann Avenue to Etiwanda
Avenue 2 9 Market Street: End to 24th Street 1
2 Limonite Avenue: Peralta Pl to Camino Real 1 10 Riverview Drive: Kern Drive to Avenue Juan Diaz 1
3 Hall Avenue: Bell Avenue to El Rio Avenue 1 11 Limonite Avenue: Pats Ranch Rd to I-15 NB Off-ramp 1
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix B: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Midblock Rank
Intersection
Collisions
Rank
Intersection
Collisions
4 Hall Avenue: El Rio Avenue to 26th Street 1 12 Jurupa Rd: Felspar Street to Van Buren Boulevard 1
5 Hall Avenue: 26th Street to 28th Street 1 13 Van Buren Boulevard: Jurupa Road to Rutile Street 1
6 Rubidoux Boulevard: Avalon St to Production
Circle 1 14 Van Buren Boulevard: Rutile Street to
Bellegrave Avenue 1
7 Rubidoux Boulevard: 26th Street to 28th
Street 1 15 Mission Boulevard: Lindsay St to His Way 1 8 Limonite Avenue: Pacific Av to Limonite
Frontage 1 16 Mission Boulevard: Canal Street to Jurupa Road 1
2019
1 Limonite Avenue: Etiwanda Avenue to
Lucretia Avenue 1 6 20th Street: End to End 1
2 Van Buren Boulevard: Jurupa Road to Rutile
Street 1 7 24th Street: Hall Avenue to Rubidoux
Boulevard 1
3 Van Buren Boulevard: Holladay Street to 56th
Street 1 8 Agua Mansa Rd: Brown Avenue to Wilson
Street 1
4 Van Buren Boulevard: Limonite Avenue to
Holladay Street 1 9 Market St: End to 24th Street 1
5 Limonite Avenue: Morton Avenue to Van
Buren Boulevard 1
2020
1 Mission Boulevard: SR-60 EB Onramp to Soto
Avenue 2 11 Camino Real: Limonite Avenue to Canyon
Terrace Drive 1
2 Mission Boulevard: End to Crestmore Road 2 12 Mission Boulevard: SR-60 WB On-ramp to Island Avenue 1
3 Granite Hill Drive: Pyrite Street to Quartz
Canyon Road 1 13 Van Buren Boulevard: Holladay Street to 56th Street 1
4 Rubidoux Boulevard: Production Circle to
Castellano Road 1 14 Jurupa Road: Hill Place to Cedar Street 1 5 Rubidoux Boulevard: 36th Street to Wilcox
Square Aly 1 15 Mission Boulevard: Hunter Street to
Campbell Street 1
6 Armstrong Road: Gillam Street to Karen Lane 1 16 Jurupa Rd: Beach Street to Rutile Street 1 7 Sierra Avenue: Armstrong Road to Karen
Lane 1 17 Mission Boulevard: His Way to Conning
Street 1
8 Mission Boulevard: Canal Street to Jurupa
Road 1 18 Limonite Avenue: Troth Street to
Ridgeview Avenue 1
9 Fairbanks Avenue: Sedona Drive to Jurupa
Road 1 19 Limonite Avenue: Ridgeview Avenue to
Mann Avenue 1
10 Market Street: End to 24th Street 1 20 Limonite Avenue: Peralta Place to Camino Real 1
Source: Riverside County Crossroads Database, 2022.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix C: List of FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures

FHWA-SA-21-029
Roadside Design
Improvements at Curves
Horizontal curves account for 27 percent of all fatal crashes and 80 percent of all fatal crashes at curves are roadway departure crashes. 1 Roadside design
improvements at curves is a strategy encompassing several treatments that target the high-risk roadside environment along the outside of horizontal curves.

These treatments can reduce roadway departure fatalities and serious injuries by giving vehicles the opportunity to recover safely and by reducing crash severity.

Roadside design improvements can be implemented alone or in combination, and are particularly recommended at horizontal curves—where data indicates a higher risk for roadway departure fatalities and serious injuries.

Roadside Design Improvements to
Provide for a Safe Recovery
In cases where a vehicle leaves
the roadway, having strategic
roadside design elements, including
an added or widened shoulder,
flattened sideslopes, or a widened
clear zone can provide drivers with
an opportunity to regain control and
re-enter the roadway in their lane or
come to a safe stop before rolling
over or encountering a fixed object.
• A clear zone is an unobstructed,
traversable roadside area that
allows a driver to stop safely or
regain control of a vehicle that has
left the roadway. Agencies should
avoid adding new fixed objects
such as trees and utility cabinets or
poles in the clear zone. AASHTO’s
Roadside Design Guide details the
clear zone width adjustment factors
to be applied at horizontal curves.
• Slope flattening reduces the
steepness of the sideslope to
increase drivers’ ability to keep the
vehicle stable, regain control of the
vehicle, and avoid obstacles. Slopes
of 1V:4H or flatter are considered
recoverable (i.e., drivers can retain
control of a vehicle by slowing or
stopping). Slopes between 1V:3H
and 1V:4H are generally considered
traversable, but non-recoverable
(i.e., errant vehicle will continue to
the bottom of the slope).
• Adding or widening shoulders
gives drivers more recovery area
to regain control in the event of a
roadway departure.

Roadside Design Improvements to
Reduce Crash Severity
Since not all roadside hazards can be
removed, relocated, or redesigned
at curves, installing roadside barriers
to shield unmovable objects or steep
embankments may be an appropriate
treatment. Three common types of
roadside barriers are:
• Cable barrier is a flexible barrier
made from steel cables mounted
on weak steel posts. Flexible barriers
are more forgiving and have the
most deflection.
• Metal-beam guardrail is a semi-
rigid barrier where a W-beam or
box-beam is mounted on steel
or timber posts. These deflect less
than cable barriers, so they can
be located closer to objects where
space is limited.
• Concrete barrier is a rigid barrier
that has little to no deflection.

Clear zone provided on the outside of
the curve. Source: FHWA.
8%
reduction for
single-vehicle crashes.2
Flatten sideslope from
1V:3H to 1V:4H:
12%
reduction for
single-vehicle crashes.2
Flatten sideslope from
1V:4H to 1V:6H:

Safety Benefits:
1 Fatality Analysis Reporting System.
2 NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, (2008).
3 Elvik, R., and Vaa, T. Handbook of Road Safety Measures, (2004). 22%
reduction for all crashes.3
Increase the distance to
roadside features from

3.3 ft to 16.7 ft:
44%
reduction for all crashes.3
Increase the distance to
roadside features from

16.7 ft to 30 ft:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-030
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/rltci/index.cfm.

Reduced Left-Turn
Conflict Intersections
Reduced left-turn conflict intersections are geometric designs that alter how left-turn movements occur. These intersections simplify decision-making for drivers and minimize the potential for higher severity crash types, such as head-on and angle. Two highly effective designs that rely on U-turns to complete certain left-turn movements are known as the Restricted Crossing U-turn (RCUT) and the Median U-turn (MUT).

Restricted Crossing U-turn
The RCUT intersection, also known
as a J-Turn, Superstreet, or Reduced
Conflict Intersection, modifies
the direct left-turn and through
movements from cross-street
approaches. Minor road traffic makes
a right turn followed by a U-turn at a
designated location—either signalized
or unsignalized—to continue in
the desired direction. The RCUT is
suitable for and adaptable to a wide
variety of circumstances, ranging
from isolated rural, high-speed
locations to urban and suburban
high-volume, multimodal corridors.

It is a competitive and less costly
alternative to constructing an
interchange. RCUTs work well
when consistently used along
a corridor, but also can be
used effectively at individual
intersections. Studies have
shown that installing an RCUT
can result in a 30-percent
increase in throughput and a
40-percent reduction in network
intersection travel time.1
Median U-turn
The MUT intersection modifies
direct left turns from the major
approaches. Vehicles proceed
through the main intersection,
make a U-turn a short distance
downstream, followed by a right
turn at the main intersection.

The U-turns can also be used for
modifying the cross-street left turns,
similar to the RCUT.

The MUT is an excellent choice for
intersections with heavy through
traffic and moderate left-turn
volumes. Studies have shown a
20- to 50-percent improvement in
intersection throughput for various
lane configurations as a result of
implementing the MUT design. When
implemented at multiple intersections
along a corridor, the efficient two-
phase signal operation of the MUT
can reduce delay, improve travel
times, and create more crossing
opportunities for pedestrians and
bicyclists.

Example of a MUT intersection. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

RCUT
Two-Way
Stop-Controlled to RCUT:
54%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.²
Signalized Intersection
to Signalized RCUT:
22%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.³
Unsignalized Intersection
to Unsignalized RCUT:
63%
reduction in fatal and
injury crashes. 4
MUT
30%
reduction in intersection-
related injury crash rate.5
Example of a unsignalized RCUT intersection.

Source: FHWA
3 1 2
1 Hugher and Jagannathan. Restricted Crossing U-Turn Intersection. FHWA-HRT-09-059, (2009). 2 Edara et al. Evaluation of J-turn Intersection Design Performance in Missouri. MoDOT, (2013). 3 Hummer and Rao. Safety Evaluation of a Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn.

FHWA-HRT-17-082, (2017).
4 Hummer et al. Superstreet Benefits and Capacities. FHWA/NC/2009-06, NC State University, (2010).
5 Synthesis of the Median U-Turn Treatment, Safety, and Operational Benefits, FHWA-HRT-07-033, (2007).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Systemic Application
of Multiple Low-Cost Countermeasures
at Stop-Controlled Intersections
This systemic approach to intersection safety involves deploying a package of multiple low-cost countermeasures, including enhanced signing and pavement markings, at a large number of stop-controlled intersections within a jurisdiction. These countermeasures increase driver awareness and recognition of the intersections and potential conflicts.

There are several benefits to
systemically applying multiple
low-cost countermeasures at stop-
controlled intersections, including,
• Resources are maximized because
the treatments are low cost.
• A high number of intersections can
receive treatment.
• Improvements are highly cost-
effective, with an average benefit-
cost ratio of 12:1, even assuming a
conservative 3-year service life.

The low-cost countermeasures
for stop-controlled intersections
generally consist of the following
treatments:

On the Through Approach
• Doubled-up (left and right),
oversized advance intersection
warning signs, with supplemental
street name plaques (can also
include flashing beacon).
• Retroreflective sheeting on sign
posts.
• Enhanced pavement markings that
delineate through lane edge lines.

On the Stop Approach
• Doubled-up (left and right),
oversized advance “Stop Ahead”
intersection warning signs (can also
include flashing beacon).
• Doubled-up (left and right),
oversized Stop signs.
• Retroreflective sheeting on sign
posts.
• Properly placed stop bar.
• Removal of vegetation, parking, or
obstructions that limit sight distance.
• Double arrow warning sign at stem
of T-intersections.

FHWA-SA-21-031
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/stop/
fhwasa18047.pdf.

Example of countermeasures
on the stop approach.

Source: South Carolina DOT
10%
15%
reduction of nighttime
crashes at all locations/
types/areas.
reduction of fatal and
injury crashes at all
locations/types/areas.

Average
Benefit-Cost Ratio
12:1
$
27%
19%
reduction of fatal and injury
crashes at 2-lane by 2-lane
intersections.
reduction of fatal and
injury crashes at rural
intersections.

Safety Benefits:

Example of countermeasures on the
through approach.

Source: South Carolina DOT
Source: T. Le et al. “Safety Effects of Low-Cost Systemic Safety Improvements at Signalized and Stop-Controlled Intersections,” 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper Number 17-05379, January 2017.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-032
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
ped_bike/step/resources/
docs/fhwasa19040.pdf.

Leading Pedestrian
Interval
A leading pedestrian interval (LPI) gives pedestrians the opportunity to enter the crosswalk at an intersection 3-7 seconds before vehicles are given a green indication. Pedestrians can better establish their presence in the crosswalk before vehicles have priority to turn right or left.

LPIs provide the following benefits:
• Increased visibility of crossing
pedestrians.
• Reduced conflicts between
pedestrians and vehicles.
• Increased likelihood of motorists
yielding to pedestrians.
• Enhanced safety for pedestrians
who may be slower to start into the
intersection.

FHWA’s Handbook for Designing
Roadways for the Aging Population
recommends the use of the LPI at
intersections with high turning vehicle
volumes. Transportation agencies
should refer to the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices for guidance on
LPI timing and ensure that pedestrian
signals are accessible for all users.

Costs for implementing LPIs are very
low when only signal timing alteration
is required.
13%
reduction in pedestrian-
vehicle crashes at
intersections.1
LPIs reduce potential conflicts between
pedestrians and turning vehicles.

Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

An LPI allows a pedestrian to establish a
presence in the crosswalk before vehicles are
given a green indication. Source: FHWA
1 Goughnour, E., D. Carter, C. Lyon, B. Persaud, B. Lan, P. Chun, I. Hamilton, and K. Signor. “Safety Evaluation of Protected Left-Turn Phasing and Leading Pedestrian Intervals on Pedestrian Safety.” Report No. FHWA-HRT-18-044. Federal Highway Administration. (October 2018)

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-033
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
LRSPDIY/.

Local Road
Safety Plans
A local road safety plan (LRSP) provides a framework for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing roadway safety improvements on local roads.

The LRSP development process and content are tailored to local issues and needs. The process results in a prioritized list of issues, risks, actions, and improvements that can be used to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on local roads. FHWA has developed several resources including an LRSP Do- It-Yourself website which further explains the process and includes resources local agencies and their partners need to create and implement an LRSP. 1 1 https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/LRSPDIY/
2 Anderson et al. Noteworthy Practices: Addressing Safety on Locally-Owned and Maintained Roads A Domestic Scan, FHWA-SA-09-019, (2010). 3 Developing Safety Plans: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners, FHWA-SA-12-017, provides guidance on developing an LRSP.

Approximately 75 percent of rural
roads are owned by local agencies.
2 While local roads are less traveled
than State highways, they have a
much higher rate of fatal and serious
injury crashes.2 Developing an LRSP
is an effective strategy to improve
local road safety for all road users
and support the goals of a State’s
overall Strategic Highway Safety Plan
(SHSP).

Although the development process
and resulting plan can vary
depending on the local agency’s
needs, available resources, and
targeted crash types, aspects
common to LRSPs include:
• Stakeholder engagement
representing the 4E’s:
engineering,
enforcement,
education, and
emergency
medical services.
• Collaboration
among
municipal,
county, Tribal,
State, and/or
Federal entities
to leverage
expertise and
resources.
• Identification of target crash types
and crash risk with corresponding
recommended proven safety
countermeasures.
• Timeline and goals for
implementation and evaluation.

Local road agencies should consider
developing an LRSP to be used as a
tool for reducing roadway fatalities,
injuries, and crashes.
3 LRSPs can
help agencies create a prioritized
list of improvements. LRSPs are
also a proactive risk management
technique to demonstrate an
agency’s responsiveness. The
plan should be viewed as a living
document that can be updated to
reflect changing local needs and
priorities.

Agencies have experienced
the following benefits after
LRSP implementation:

Infographic showing the LRSP process. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:
25%
17%
reduction in fatal and
serious injury crashes on
county-owned roads in
Washington State.
reduction in county road
fatalities in Minnesota.
35%
reduction in severe
curve crashes in Thurston
County, WA.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Enhanced Delineation
for Horizontal Curves
Enhanced delineation at horizontal curves includes a variety of potential strategies that can be implemented in advance of or within curves, in combination, or individually.

Potential Strategies In Advance of Curve Within Curve
Pavement markings (standard width
or wider)
In-lane curve warning pavement markings
Retroreflective strips on sign posts
Delineators
Chevron signs
Enhanced Conspicuity (larger, fluorescent,
and/or retroreflective signs)
Dynamic curve warning signs
(including speed radar feedback signs)
Sequential dynamic chevrons
Enhanced delineation treatments
can alert drivers to upcoming curves,
the direction and sharpness of the
curve, and appropriate operating
speed.

Agencies can take the following
steps to implement enhanced
delineation strategies:

1. Review signing practices and
policies to ensure they comply
with the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
principles of traffic control devices.

Consistent practice for similar
curves sets the appropriate driver
expectancy.

2. Use the systemic approach to
identify and treat problem curves.

For example, Minnesota uses risk
factors that include curve radii
between 500 and 1,200 ft, traffic
volumes between 500 and 1,000
vehicles per day, intersection in
the curve, and presence of a
visual trap.1

3. Match the appropriate strategy
to the identified problem(s),
considering the full range of
enhanced delineation treatments.

Once the MUTCD requirements and
recommendations have been met,
an incremental approach is often
beneficial to avoid excessive cost.

FHWA-SA-21-035
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/
countermeasures/horicurves/.

Chevron signs with retroreflective strips on sign
posts installed along a curve. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

Chevron Signs
25% reduction in nighttime
crashes.1
16% reduction in
non-intersection fatal and
injury crashes.2
Oversized Chevron Signs
15% reduction in fatal and
injury crashes.3
Sequential Dynamic Chevrons
60% reduction in fatal and
injury crashes.3
In-Lane Curve Warning
Pavement Markings
35 - 38% reduction in
all crashes.4,5
New Fluorescent Curve Signs
or Upgrade Existing Curve
Signs to Fluorescent Sheeting
18% reduction in non-
intersection, head-on,
run-off-road, and sideswipe
in rural areas.1
1 Albin et al. Low-Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety 2016. FHWA-SA-15-084, (2016). 2 Srinivasan et al. Safety Evaluation of Improved Curve Delineation. FHWA-HRT-09-045, (2009). 3 Lyon et al. Safety Evaluation of Two Curve Warning Treatments: In-Lane Curve Warning Pavement Markings and Oversized Chevron Signs. Presented at the 96th TRB Annual Meeting, Paper No. 17-00432, (2017).
4 Hallmark, S. Evaluation of Sequential Dynamic Chevrons on Rural Two-lane Highways.

FHWA, (2017).
5 Donnell et al. Reducing Roadway Departure Crashes at Horizontal Curve Sections on Two-lane Rural Highways. FHWA-SA-19-005, (2019).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-036
Longitudinal Rumble
Strips and Stripes
Longitudinal rumble strips are milled or raised elements on the pavement intended to alert drivers through vibration and sound that their vehicle has left the travel lane. They can be installed on the shoulder, edge line, or at or near the center line of an undivided roadway.

Rumble stripes are edge line or center line rumble strips where the pavement marking is placed over the rumble strip. This can increase the visibility and durability of the pavement marking during wet, nighttime conditions, and can improve the durability of the marking on roads with snowplowing operations.
1 Himes, S., and McGee, H. Decision Support Guide for the Installation of Shoulder and Center Line Rumble Strips on Non-Freeways. Federal Highway Administration Report No. FHWA-SA-16-115. (August 2016). 2 Bedsole et al. Did You Hear That? Public Roads Magazine, Volume 80, No. 4. FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HRT-17-002, (2017).
3 NCHRP Synthesis 339: Centerline Rumble Strips – A Synthesis of Highway Practices, (2005). 4 NCHRP Report 641: Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips, (2009).

With roadway departure crashes
accounting for more than half of
the fatal roadway crashes annually
in the United States, rumble strips
and stripes are designed to address
these crashes by alerting distracted,
drowsy, or otherwise inattentive
drivers who drift from their lane. They
are most effective when deployed
systemically.

Transportation agencies should
consider milled center line rumble
strips (including in passing zone
areas) and milled edge line
or shoulder rumble strips with
bicycle gaps for systemic safety
projects, location-specific corridor
safety improvements, as well as
reconstruction or resurfacing
projects.

Considerations
• Rumble strips are relatively low-
cost, and economic analyses have
indicated benefit/cost ratios that
exceed 100.
1 • Where rumble strips cannot be
placed due to noise concerns,
agencies may consider a design
using an oscillating sine wave
pattern (also known as “mumble
strips”) that reduces noise outside
of the vehicle. However, the safety
benefits of this design need more
study.
2 • Maintenance concerns:
• Where rumble strips are placed
along a pavement joint, there
are typically no issues with
joint stability if the pavement
structure and joint was already
in good condition.
• Studies have shown no
evidence of issues related to
snow, ice, or rain build-up in the
rumble strip.
3 Shoulder rumble strips and center line rumble
stripes are installed on this roadway.

Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

Center Line Rumble Strips
reduction in head-on fatal
and injury crashes on
two-lane rural roads.4
44-64%
Shoulder Rumble Strips
reduction in single vehicle,
run-off-road fatal and
injury crashes on two-lane
rural roads.4
13-51%
Example of an edge line rumble stripe.

Source: Missouri DOT
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/pavement/
rumble_strips/.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Median Barriers
Median barriers are longitudinal barriers that separate opposing traffic on a divided highway and are designed to redirect vehicles striking either side of the barrier. Median barriers significantly reduce the number of cross-median crashes, which are attributed to the relatively high speeds that are typical on divided highways. AASHTO’s Roadside Design Guide (RDG) recommends guidelines for the use of median barriers on high-speed, fully controlled- access roadways for locations where the median is 30 ft in width or less and the average daily traffic (ADT) is greater than 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd).

For locations with median widths greater than 50 ft and where the ADT is less than 20,000 vpd, a median barrier is optional. For locations where the median is between 30 and 50 feet, the RDG suggests an analysis to determine the cost effectiveness of median barrier installation. Median barriers can be cable, metal-beam, or concrete.
• Cable barriers are flexible barriers,
made from steel cables mounted
on weak steel posts, resulting in
less occupant impact force as it
absorbs energy from the crash,
capturing or redirecting the vehicle.

Due to larger deflection, median
width is an important consideration.

These barriers are more adaptable
to slopes typically found in medians.

Cable barriers tend to require more
frequent maintenance and repair
than other barrier types.
• Metal-beam guardrails are
considered semi-rigid barriers,
where the W-beam or box-beam
is mounted to steel or timber
posts. When impacted, they are
designed to deform and deflect,
absorbing some of the crash
energy and redirecting the vehicle.

Metal-beam guardrails often do
not require maintenance after
minor impacts. They deflect less
than cable barriers, so they can
be located closer to objects where
space is limited.
• Concrete barriers are usually rigid
and result in little to no deflection.

They redirect rather than absorb
energy from the impact. Rigid
concrete barriers seldom require
repair or maintenance. Some
agencies have used portable
concrete barriers as median
barriers. These barriers require
repositioning after an impact but
are typically less maintenance than
a post mounted barrier.

To reduce cross-median crashes,
transportation agencies should
review their head-on crash history
on divided highways to identify hot
spots. Agencies should also consider
implementing a systemic approach
to median barrier placement based
on cross-median crash risk factors.

Potential risk factors include:
• Traffic volumes.
• Vehicle classifications.
• Median crossover history.
• Crash incidents.
• Vertical and horizontal alignment.
• Median terrain configurations.

FHWA-SA-21-037
97%
8%
reduction in
cross-median crashes.2
of all fatalities on divided
highways are due to
head-on crashes.1
Median Barriers Installed
on Rural Four-Lane
Freeways
Median cable barrier prevents a
potential head-on crash.

Source: Washington State DOT
Safety Benefits:

For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/
countermeasures/reduce_
crash_severity/.
1 Fatality Analysis Reporting System.
2 NCHRP Report 794: Median Cross-Section Design for Rural Divided Highways, (2011).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
SafetyEdgeSM
The SafetyEdgeSM technology shapes the edge of the pavement at approximately 30 degrees from the pavement cross slope during the paving process. This safety practice eliminates the potential for vertical drop-off at the pavement edge, has minimal effect on project cost, and can improve pavement durability by reducing edge raveling of asphalt.

Rural road crashes involving edge
drop-offs are 2-4 times more likely to
include a fatality than other crashes
on similar roads.
1 Vehicles may leave
the roadway for various reasons
ranging from distracted driver errors
to low visibility, or to the presence
of an animal on the road. Exposed
vertical pavement edges can cause
vehicles to become unstable and
prevent their safe return to the
roadway. The SafetyEdge
SM gives
drivers the opportunity to return to
their travel lane while maintaining
control of their vehicle.

The SafetyEdge
SM technology only
requires adding one of several
commercially available devices to
the screed or endgate when placing
hot-mix asphalt. Forms for shaping
the edge of concrete pavement are
simpler and can be made on site
by the contractor. Some agencies
allow the SafetyEdge
SM to remain
exposed while a segment is under
construction, unlike conventional
pavement edges. However, before
construction ends, agencies should
bring the adjacent roadside flush
with the top of the pavement
for both the SafetyEdge
SM and
traditional pavement edge. Over
time, regardless of the edge type,
the edge may become exposed
due to settling, erosion, and tire
wear. When this occurs, the gentle
slope provided by the SafetyEdge
SM
is preferred versus the traditional
vertical pavement edge.

Transportation agencies should
develop standards for implementing
the SafetyEdge
SM systemwide on all
new asphalt paving and resurfacing
projects where curbs and/or
guardrail are not present, while also
encouraging standard application
for concrete pavements.

FHWA-SA-21-038
Example of the SafetyEdgeSM after backfill
material settles or erodes. Source: FHWA
Cross-section view of an overlay with the SafetyEdgeSM. Source: FHWA-SA-17-044 11%
reduction in fatal and
injury crashes.2
21%
reduction in
run-off-road crashes.2
Safety Benefits:
19%
reduction in head-on
crashes.2
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
safetyedge/.

Benefit-Cost Ratio Range3
700:1 to 1,500:1
$
1 Hallmark et al. Safety Impacts of Pavement Edge Drop-offs, (Washington, DC:

AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety: 2006), p 93.
2 Donnell et al. Development of Crash Modification Factors for the Application of the SafetyEdgeSM on Two-Lane Rural Roads. FHWA-HRT-17-081, (2017). 3 Safety Effects of the SafetyEdgeSM, FHWA-SA-17-044, (2017).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-039
Backplates with
Retroreflective Borders
Backplates added to a traffic signal head improve the visibility of the illuminated face of the signal by introducing a controlled-contrast background. The improved visibility of a signal head with a backplate is made even more conspicuous by framing it with a 1- to 3-inch yellow retroreflective border. Signal heads that have backplates equipped with retroreflective borders are more visible and conspicuous in both daytime and nighttime conditions.

This treatment is recognized as a
human factors enhancement of
traffic signal visibility, conspicuity,
and orientation for both older
and color vision deficient drivers.

This countermeasure is also
advantageous during periods of
power outages when the signals
would otherwise be dark, providing a
visible cue for motorists to stop at the
intersection ahead.

Considerations
Transportation agencies should
consider backplates with
retroreflective borders as part
of their efforts to systematically
improve safety performance at
signalized intersections. Adding a
retroreflective border to an existing
signal backplate is a very low-cost
safety treatment. This can be done
by either adding retroreflective
tape to an existing backplate or
purchasing a new backplate with
a retroreflective border already
incorporated. The most efficient
means of implementing this proven
safety countermeasure is to adopt
it as a standard treatment for
signalized intersections across a
jurisdiction or State.

Implementation challenges
include minimizing installation time,
accessing existing signal heads, and
structural limitations due to added
wind load in instances where an
entire backplate is added. Agencies
should consider the design of the
existing signal support structure to
determine if the design is sufficient to
support the added wind load.
15%
reduction in total crashes.1
Safety Benefits:

Retroreflective Border
Signal Backplate
Signal backplate framed with a
retroreflective border. Source: FHWA
Retroreflective borders are highly
visible during the night. Source: South
Carolina DOT
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safe-
ty Countermeasures, please
visit https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/
and https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/
view/dot/42807.
1 Sayed, T., Leur, P., and Pump, J., “Safety Impact of Increased Traffic Signal Backboards Conspicuity.” 2005 TRB 84th Annual Meeting: Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, Vol. TRB#05-16, Washington, D.C., (2005).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Corridor Access
Management
Access management refers to the design, application, and control of entry and exit points along a roadway. This includes intersections with other roads and driveways that serve adjacent properties. Thoughtful access management along a corridor can simultaneously enhance safety for all modes, facilitate walking and biking, and reduce trip delay and congestion.

Every intersection, from a signalized
intersection to an unpaved driveway,
has the potential for conflicts
between vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicyclists. The number and types of
conflict points—locations where the
travel paths of two users intersect—
influence the safety performance of
the intersection or driveway. FHWA
developed corridor-level crash
prediction models to estimate and
analyze the safety effects of selected
access management techniques
for different area types, land uses,
roadway variables, and traffic
volumes.
1 The following access management
strategies can be used individually or
in combination with one another:
• Reduce density through driveway
closure, consolidation, or
relocation.
• Manage spacing of intersection
and access points.
• Limit allowable movements at
driveways (such as right-in/
right-out only).
• Place driveways on an intersection
approach corner rather than a
receiving corner, which is expected
to have fewer total crashes.
2 • Implement raised medians
that preclude across-roadway
movements.
• Utilize designs such as roundabouts
or reduced left-turn conflicts (such
as restricted crossing U-turn, median
U-turns, etc.).
• Provide turn lanes (i.e., left-only,
right-only, or interior two-way left).
• Use lower speed one-way or two-
way off-arterial circulation roads.

Successful corridor access
management involves balancing
overall safety and mobility for
all users along with the needs of
adjacent land uses.

FHWA-SA-21-040
5-23%
reduction in total crashes
along 2-lane rural roads.3
25-31%
reduction in fatal and
injury crashes along urban/
suburban arterials.4
Schematic of an intersection and adjacent access points. Source: FHWA Tandem roundabouts with a continuous raised
median eliminates left-turn and across-roadway
conflicts. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

Reducing driveway density
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/cam/index.cfm.
1 Gross et al. Safety Evaluation of Access Management
Policies and Techniques. FHWA-HRT-14-057, (2018).
2 Le et al. Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at
Signalized Intersections. FHWA-HRT-17-084, (2018).
3 Harwood et al. Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways. FHWA-RD-99-207, (2000).
4 Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Oxford, United Kingdom, Elsevier, (2004).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Dedicated Left- and
Right-Turn Lanes at Intersections
Auxiliary turn lanes—either for left turns or right turns—provide physical separation between turning traffic that is slowing or stopped and adjacent through traffic at approaches to intersections. Turn lanes can be designed to provide for deceleration prior to a turn, as well as for storage of vehicles that are stopped and waiting for the opportunity to complete a turn.

While turn lanes provide measurable
safety and operational benefits at
many types of intersections, they
are particularly helpful at two-way
stop-controlled intersections. Crashes
occurring at these intersections are
often related to turning maneuvers.

Since the major route traffic is free
flowing and typically travels at higher
speeds, crashes that do occur are
often severe. The main crash types
include collisions of vehicles turning
left across opposing through traffic
and rear-end collisions of vehicles
turning left or right with other vehicles
following closely behind. Turn lanes
reduce the potential for these types
of crashes.

Installing left-turn lanes and/or right-
turn lanes should be considered
for the major road approaches
for improving safety at both three-
and four-leg intersections with stop
control on the minor road, where
significant turning volumes exist,
or where there is a history of turn-
related crashes. Pedestrian and
bicyclist safety and convenience
should also be considered when
adding turn lanes at an intersection.

Specifically, offset left- and right-turn
lanes will lengthen crossing distances
for pedestrians.

Offset Turn Lanes
Providing offset of left- and right-
turn lanes to increase visibility can
provide added safety benefits, and
is preferable in many situations,
particularly at locations with higher
speeds, or where free-flow or
permissive movements are possible.

At turn lanes with zero or negative
offset, turning vehicles can block
sightlines. For left-turn lanes, this
usually involves opposing left-turning
vehicles occupying the turn lanes
at the same time. For right-turn
lanes, this typically involves right-
turning vehicles from the major
road and vehicles entering the
intersection from the minor road.

In both scenarios, adding positive
offset to turn lanes enhances the
sight distance to approaching
vehicles that conflict with the turning
movement. Offset turn lanes should
be considered when there is a high
frequency of these types of conflicts
in order to reduce the likelihood of a
severe crash.

FHWA-SA-21-041
Left- and right-turn lanes on a two-lane
road. Source: City of Greeley, CO
Illustration comparing zero offset to positive offset of left- and right-turn lanes. Source: FHWA Left-Turn Lanes
reduction in total crashes.1
28-48%
Right-Turn Lanes
reduction in total crashes.1
14-26%
Safety Benefits:

Positive Offset
Left-Turn Lanes
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.2
36%
Zero Offset Positive Offset
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
publications/research/safety
/02103/02103techbrief.pdf. 1 Harwood et al. Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes.

FHWA-HRD-02-089, (2002).
2 Persaud et al. Safety Evaluation of Offset Improvements for Left-Turn Lanes.

FHWA-HRT-09-035, (2009).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-042
Roundabouts
The modern roundabout is an intersection with a circular configuration that safely and efficiently moves traffic. Roundabouts feature channelized, curved approaches that reduce vehicle speed, entry yield control that gives right-of- way to circulating traffic, and counterclockwise flow around a central island that minimizes conflict points. The net result of lower speeds and reduced conflicts at roundabouts is an environment where crashes that cause injury or fatality are substantially reduced.

Roundabouts are not only a safer
type of intersection; they are also
efficient in terms of keeping people
moving. Even while calming traffic,
they can reduce delay and queuing
when compared to other intersection
alternatives. Furthermore, the lower
vehicular speeds and reduced
conflict environment can create
a more suitable environment for
walking and bicycling.

Roundabouts can be implemented
in both urban and rural areas under
a wide range of traffic conditions.

They can replace signals, two-
way stop controls, and all-way
stop controls. Roundabouts are an
effective option for managing speed
and transitioning traffic from high-
speed to low-speed environments,
such as freeway interchange ramp
terminals, and rural intersections
along high-speed roads.

Example of a single-lane roundabout. Source: FHWA
Illustration of a multilane roundabout.

Source: FHWA
Two-Way Stop-Controlled
Intersection to a Roundabout
82%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.1
Signalized Intersection to a
Roundabout
78%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.1
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven
Safety Countermeasures,
please visit https://safety.
fhwa.dot.gov/provencounter
measures/ and https://safety.
fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/
roundabouts/index.cfm.

Safety Benefits:
1 AASHTO. The Highway Safety Manual, American Association of State Highway Transportation Professionals, Washington, D.C., (2010).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-043
Yellow Change
Intervals
At a signalized intersection, the yellow change interval is the length of time that the yellow signal indication is displayed following a green signal indication. The yellow signal confirms to motorists that the green has ended and that a red will soon follow.
1 Federal Highway Administration. “Automated Traffic Signal Performance,” (2020). 2 NCHRP Report 731: Guidelines for Timing Yellow and All-Red Intervals at Signalized Intersections, (2011).

Since red-light running is a leading
cause of severe crashes at signalized
intersections, it is imperative that
the yellow change interval be
appropriately timed. Too brief an
interval may result in drivers being
unable to stop safely and cause
unintentional red-light running.

Too long of an interval may result
in drivers treating the yellow as
an extension of the green phase
and invite intentional red-light
running. Factors such as the speed
of approaching and turning
vehicles, driver perception-reaction
time, vehicle deceleration, and
intersection geometry should all be
considered in the timing calculation.

Transportation agencies can improve
signalized intersection safety and
reduce red-light running by reviewing
and updating their traffic signal
timing policies and procedures
concerning the yellow change
interval. Agencies should institute
regular evaluation and adjustment
protocols for existing traffic signal
timing. Refer to the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices for
basic requirements and further
recommendations about yellow
change interval timing. As part of
strategic signal system modernization
and updates, incorporating
automated traffic signal
performance measures (ATSPMs) is
a proven approach to improve on
traditional retiming processes. ATSPMs
provide continuous performance
monitoring capability and the ability
to modify timing based on actual
performance, without requiring
expensive modeling or data
collection.
1 8-14%
reduction in
total crashes.2
12%
reduction in
injury crashes.2
Appropriately timed yellow change intervals
can reduce red-light running and improve
overall intersection safety. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:
36-50%
reduction in
red light running.2
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/signal/
fhwasa13027.pdf.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Pedestrian Refuge
Island
reduction in
pedestrian crashes.2
Median with
Marked Crosswalk
reduction in
pedestrian crashes.2
FHWA-SA-21-044
Medians and
Pedestrian Refuge Islands in Urban
and Suburban Areas
A median is the area between opposing lanes of traffic, excluding turn lanes. Medians in urban and suburban areas can be defined by pavement markings, raised medians, or islands to separate motorized and non- motorized road users.

A pedestrian refuge island (or crossing area) is a median with a refuge area that is intended to help protect pedestrians who are crossing a road. 1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020, March). Pedestrians:
2018 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 850).

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
2 Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors, FHWA-SA-08-011, September 2008, Table 11.

Pedestrian crashes account for
approximately 17 percent of all traffic
fatalities annually, and 74 percent
of these occur at non-intersection
locations.
1 For pedestrians to
safely cross a roadway, they must
estimate vehicle speeds, determine
acceptable gaps in traffic based
on their walking speed, and predict
vehicle paths. Installing a median
or pedestrian refuge island can
help improve safety by allowing
pedestrians to cross one direction of
traffic at a time.

Transportation agencies should
consider medians or pedestrian
refuge islands in curbed sections of
urban and suburban multilane
roadways, particularly in areas with
a significant mix of pedestrian and
vehicle traffic, traffic volumes over
9,000 vehicles per day, and travel
speeds 35 mph or greater. Medians/
refuge islands should be at least
4-ft wide, but preferably 8 ft for
pedestrian comfort. Some example
locations that may benefit from
medians or pedestrian refuge islands
include:
• Mid-block crossings.
• Approaches to multilane
intersections.
• Areas near transit stops or other
pedestrian-focused sites.

Example of a road with a median and
pedestrian refuge islands.

Source: City of Charlotte, NC
Median and pedestrian refuge island
near a roundabout. Source:
www.pedbikeimages.org / Dan Burden
46%
56%
Safety Benefits:

For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safe-
ty Countermeasures, please
visit https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/
and https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/ped_bike/step/docs/
techSheet_PedRefugeIs
land2018.pdf.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-045
Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacons
The pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) is a traffic control device designed to help pedestrians safely cross higher-speed roadways at midblock crossings and uncontrolled intersections. The beacon head consists of two red lenses above a single yellow lens. The lenses remain “dark” until a pedestrian desiring to cross the street pushes the call button to activate the beacon, which then initiates a yellow to red lighting sequence consisting of flashing and steady lights that directs motorists to slow and come to a stop, and provides the right- of-way to the pedestrian to safely cross the roadway before going dark again. 1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020, March). Pedestrians:
2018 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 850). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
2 Zegeer et al. NCHRP Report 841: Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. TRB, (2017). 3 Fitzpatrick, K. and Park, E.S. Safety Effectiveness of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treatment, FHWA-HRT-10-042, (2010).

Nearly 74 percent of pedestrian
fatalities occur at non-intersection
locations, and vehicle speeds are
often a major contributing factor.
1 As a safety strategy to address this
pedestrian crash risk, the PHB is an
intermediate option between a
flashing beacon and a full pedestrian
signal because it assigns right of way
and provides positive stop control. It
also allows motorists to proceed once
the pedestrian has cleared their side
of the travel lane(s), reducing vehicle
delay.

Transportation agencies should refer
to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) for information on
the application of PHBs.

In general, PHBs are used where it
is difficult for pedestrians to cross
a roadway, such as when gaps in
traffic are not sufficient or speed
limits exceed 35 miles per hour.

They are very effective at locations
where three or more lanes will
be crossed or traffic volumes are
above 9,000 annual average daily
traffic. Installation of a PHB must
also include a marked crosswalk
and pedestrian countdown signal.

If PHBs are not already familiar to a
community, agencies should conduct
appropriate education and outreach
as part of implementation.

Example of PHBs mounted
on a mast arm. Source: FHWA
Sequence for a PHB. Source: MUTCD 2009 Edition, p. 511, FHWA 29%
reduction in total crashes.3
15%
reduction in fatal and
serious injury crashes.3
55%
reduction in
pedestrian crashes.2
Safety Benefits:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-046
Road Diets
(Roadway Reconfiguration)
A Road Diet, or roadway reconfiguration, can improve safety, calm traffic, provide better mobility and access for all road users, and enhance overall quality of life. A Road Diet typically involves converting an existing four-lane undivided roadway to a three-lane roadway consisting of two through lanes and a center two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL).

Benefits of Road Diet installations
may include:
• Reduction of rear-end and left-turn
crashes due to the dedicated
left-turn lane.
• Reduced right-angle crashes as
side street motorists cross three
versus four travel lanes.
• Fewer lanes for pedestrians to cross.
• Opportunity to install pedestrian
refuge islands, bicycle lanes,
on-street parking, or transit stops.
• Traffic calming and more consistent
speeds.
• A more community-focused,
Complete Streets environment that
better accommodates the needs
of all road users.

A Road Diet can be a low-cost
safety solution when planned in
conjunction with a simple pavement
overlay, and the reconfiguration can
be accomplished at no additional
cost. Typically, a Road Diet is
implemented on a roadway with
a current and future average daily
traffic of 25,000 or less.
19-47%
reduction in total crashes.1
Road Diet project in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Source: Leidos
Road Diet Conversions
Safety Benefits:
4-Lane to 3-Lane
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
road_diets/.

BEFORE AFTER
Before and after example of a Road Diet. Source: FHWA
1 Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet” Measures on Crashes, FHWA-HRT-10-053, (2010).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-047
Walkways
A walkway is any type of defined space or pathway for use by a person traveling by foot or using a wheelchair. These may be pedestrian walkways, shared use paths, sidewalks, or roadway shoulders.

With more than 6,200 pedestrian
fatalities and 75,000 pedestrian
injuries occurring in roadway
crashes annually,
1 it is important for
transportation agencies to improve
conditions and safety for pedestrians
and to integrate walkways more
fully into the transportation system.

Research shows people living in low-
income communities are less likely
to encounter walkways and other
pedestrian-friendly features.
2 Well-designed pedestrian walkways,
shared use paths, and sidewalks
improve the safety and mobility of
pedestrians. Pedestrians should have
direct and connected network of
walking routes to desired destinations
without gaps or abrupt changes. In
some rural or suburban areas, where
these types of walkways are not
feasible, roadway shoulders provide
an area for pedestrians to walk next
to the roadway, although these are
not preferable.

Transportation agencies should work
towards incorporating pedestrian
facilities into all roadway projects
unless exceptional circumstances
exist. It is important to provide and
maintain accessible walkways along
both sides of the road in urban areas,
particularly near school zones and
transit locations, and where there is a
large amount of pedestrian activity.

Walkable shoulders should also be
considered along both sides of rural
highways when routinely used by
pedestrians.

Example of a sidewalk in a residential area.

Source: pedbikeimages.org / Burden
Paved shoulder used as a walkway. Source: pedbikeimages.org / Burden Safety Benefits:

Sidewalks
reduction in crashes involving
pedestrians walking along
roadways.3
65-89%
Paved Shoulders
reduction in crashes involving
pedestrians walking along
roadways.3
71%
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
http://www.pedbikesafe.org/
PEDSAFE/countermeasures_
detail.cfm?CM_NUM=1.
1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020, March). Pedestrians:
2018 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 850). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
2 Gibbs, et all. Income Disparities in Street Features that Encourage Walking.

Bridging the Gap, (2012, March).
3 Gan et al. Update of Florida Crash Reduction Factors and Countermeasures to Improve the Development of District Safety Improvement Projects. Florida DOT, (2005).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-048
Road Safety Audit
While most transportation agencies have established traditional safety review procedures, a road safety audit (RSA) or assessment is unique. RSAs are performed by a multidisciplinary team independent of the project. RSAs consider all road users, account for human factors and road user capabilities, are documented in a formal report, and require a formal response from the road owner. (See the eight steps for conducting an RSA below.) RSAs provide the following
benefits:
• Reduced number and severity of
crashes due to safer designs.
• Reduced costs resulting from early
identification and mitigation of
safety issues before projects are
built.
• Increased opportunities to integrate
multimodal safety strategies and
proven safety countermeasures.
• Expanded ability to consider
human factors in all facets of
design.
• Increased communication and
collaboration among safety
stakeholders.
• Objective review by independent
multidisciplinary team.

RSAs can be performed in any
phase of project development,
from planning through construction.

Agencies may focus RSAs
specifically on motorized vehicles,
pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists,
or a combination of these roadway
users. Agencies are encouraged
to conduct an RSA at the earliest
stage possible, as all roadway design
options and alternatives are being
explored.

Multidisciplinary team performs field review
during an RSA. Source: FHWA
10-60%
reduction in total crashes.1
Source: FHWA
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
rsa/.

Safety Benefits:
1 Road Safety Audits: An Evaluation of RSA Programs and Projects, FHWA-SA-12-037; and FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines, FHWA-SA-06-06.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Appropriate Speed
Limits for All Road Users
There is broad consensus among global roadway safety experts that speed control is one of the most important methods for reducing fatalities and serious injuries.

Speed is an especially important factor on non-limited access roadways where vehicles and vulnerable road users mix.

A driver may not see or be aware of the conditions within a corridor, and may drive at a speed that feels reasonable for themselves but may not be for all users of the system, especially vulnerable road users, including children and seniors. A driver traveling at 30 miles per hour who hits a pedestrian has a 45 percent chance of killing or seriously injuring them.
1 At 20 miles per hour, that percentage drops
to 5 percent.1 A number of cities across the United States, including New York, Washington, Seattle and Minneapolis, have reduced their local speed limits in recent years in an effort to reduce fatalities and serious injuries, with most having to secure State legislative authorization to do so.

States and local jurisdictions should set appropriate speed limits to reduce the significant risks drivers impose on others—especially vulnerable road users—and on themselves. Addressing speed is fundamental to the Safe System Approach to making streets safer, and a growing body of research shows that speed limit changes alone can lead to measurable declines in speeds and crashes. 2 Applications
Posted speed limits are often the same
as the legislative statutory speed limit.

Agencies with designated authorities to
set speed limits, which include States,
and sometimes local jurisdictions, can
establish non-statutory speed limits or
designate reduced speed zones, and
a growing number are doing so. While
non-statutory speed limits must be based
on an engineering study, conducted in
accordance with the
Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) involving
multiple factors and engineering
judgment, FHWA is also encouraging
agencies to use the following:
3 • Expert Systems tools.
o USLIMITS2.
o NCHRP 966: Posted Speed Limit
Setting Procedure and Tool.
• Safe System approach.

Based on international experience
and implementation in the United
States, the use of 20 mph speed zones
or speed limits in urban core areas
where vulnerable users share the road
environment with motorists may result in
further safety benefits.
4 Considerations
When setting a speed limit, agencies
should consider a range of factors such
as pedestrian and bicyclist activity, crash
history, land use context, intersection
spacing, driveway density, roadway
geometry, roadside conditions, roadway
functional classification, traffic volume,
and observed speeds.

To achieve desired speeds, agencies
often implement other speed
management strategies concurrently
with setting speed limits, such as self-
enforcing roadways, traffic calming,
and speed safety cameras. Additional
information is in the following FHWA
resources:
• FHWA Speed Management website.
• Self-Enforcing Roadways:

A Guidance Report.
• Noteworthy Speed
Management Practices.
• Jurisdiction Speed Management
Action Plan Development Package.
• Traffic Calming ePrimer.

FHWA-SA-21-034
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
speedmgt/ref_mats/.

Safety Benefits:

Traffic fatalities in the City
of Seattle decreased
26 percent after the
city implemented
comprehensive, city-wide
speed management
strategies and
countermeasures inspired
by Vision Zero. This included
setting speed limits on
all non-arterial streets at
20 mph and 200 miles of
arterial streets at 25 mph.5
One study found that
on rural roads, when
considering other relevant
factors in the engineering
study along with the speed
distribution, setting a speed
limit no more than 5 mph
below the 85th-percentile
speed may result in fewer
total and fatal plus injury
crashes, and lead to drivers
complying closely with the
posted speed limit.6
1 Reducing the speed limit to 20 mph in urban areas: Child deaths and injuries would be decreased. 2 Lowering the speed limit from 30 to 25 mph in Boston: effects on vehicle speeds. 3 FHWA’s Methods and Practices for Setting Speed Limits: An Informational Report, (2012). 4 Recommendations of the Academic Expert Group for the 3rd Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety.
5 https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/ref_mats/fhwasa20047/sec8.cfm#foot813 6 Safety and Operational Impacts of Setting Speed Limits below Engineering Recommendations.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Separated bicycle lane in Washington, DC.

Source: Alex Baca, Washington Area
Bicyclist Association
49%
for total crashes
on urban 4-lane undivided
collectors and local roads.6
FHWA-SA-21-051
Bicycle Lanes
Most fatal and serious injury bicyclist crashes occur at non-intersection locations.

Nearly one-third of these crashes involve overtaking motorists1; the speed and size differential between vehicles and bicycles can lead to severe injury. To make bicycling safer and more comfortable for most types of bicyclists, State and local agencies should consider installing bicycle lanes. These dedicated facilities for the use of bicyclists along the roadway can take several forms. Providing bicycle facilities can mitigate or prevent interactions, conflicts, and crashes between bicyclists and motor vehicles, and create a network of safer roadways for bicycling. Bicycle Lanes align with the Safe System Approach principle of recognizing human vulnerability—where separating users in space can enhance safety for all road users.

Applications
FHWA’s Bikeway Selection Guide and
Incorporating On-Road Bicycle Networks
into Resurfacing Projects assist agencies
in determining which facilities provide
the most benefit in various contexts.

Bicycle lanes can be included on
new roadways or created on existing
roads by reallocating space in the
right-of-way.

In addition to the paint stripe used
for a typical bicycle lane, a lateral
offset with painted buffer can help to
further separate bicyclists from vehicle
traffic. State and local agencies may
also consider physical separation
of the bicycle lane from motorized
traffic lanes through the use of
vertical elements like posts, curbs, or
vegetation.
2 Based on international
experience and implementation in
the United States, there is potential
for further safety benefits associated
with separated bicycle lanes. FHWA
is conducting research on separated
bicycle lanes, which includes the
development of crash modification
factors, to be completed in 2022 to
address significant interest on this topic.

Considerations
• City and State policies may require
minimum bicycle lane widths, although
these can differ by agency and
functional classification of the road.
• Bicycle lane design should
vary according to roadway
characteristics (e.g., motor vehicle
volumes and speed) in order to
maximize the facility’s suitability for
riders of all ages and abilities and
should consider the travel needs of
low-income populations likely to use
bicycles. The Bikeway Selection Guide
is a useful resource.
• While some in the public may
oppose travel lane narrowing if they
believe it will slow traffic or increase
congestion, studies have found that
roadways did not experience an
increase in injuries or congestion
when travel lane widths were
decreased to add a bicycle lane.
3 • Studies and experience in US cities
show that bicycle lanes increase
ridership and may help jurisdictions
better manage roadway capacity
without increased risk.
• In rural areas, rumble strips can
negatively impact bicyclists’ ability to
ride if not properly installed. Agencies
should consider the dimensions,
placement, and offset of rumble strips
when adding a bicycle lane.
4 • Strategies, practices, and processes
can be used by agencies to
enhance their ability to address
equity in bicycle planning and
design.
5 Bicycle Lane Additions can
reduce crashes up to:
30%
for total crashes on urban
2-lane undivided
collectors and local roads.6
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
ped_bike/tools_solve/docs/
fhwasa18077.pdf.

Safety Benefits:

Separated bicycle lanes may
provide further safety benefits.

FHWA is anticipating completion
of research in Fall 2022.
1 Thomas et al. Bicyclist Crash Types on National,
State, and Local Levels: A New Look. Transportation
Research Record 673(6), 664-676, (2019).
2 Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide.

FHWA-HEP-15-025, (2015).
3 Park and Abdel-Aty. “Evaluation of safety effective- ness of multiple cross sectional features on urban
arterials”. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 92,
pp. 245-255, (2016).
4 FHWA Tech Advisory Shoulder and Edge Line Rumble
Strips, (2011).
5 Sandt et al. Pursuing Equity in Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning. FHWA, (2016).
6 Avelar et al. Development of Crash Modification
Factors for Bicycle Lane Additions While Reducing
Lane and Shoulder Widths. FHWA, (2021).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-049
Crosswalk Visibility
Enhancements
Poor lighting conditions, obstructions such as parked cars, and horizontal or vertical roadway curvature can reduce visibility at crosswalks, contributing to safety issues. For multilane roadway crossings where vehicle volumes are in excess of 10,000 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT), a marked crosswalk alone is typically not sufficient. Under such conditions, more substantial crossing improvements could prevent an increase in pedestrian crash potential.

Three main crosswalk visibility enhancements help make crosswalks and the pedestrians, bicyclists, wheelchair and other mobility device users, and transit users using them more visible to drivers. These include high-visibility crosswalks, lighting, and signing and pavement markings. These enhancements can also assist users in deciding where to cross. Agencies can implement these features as standalone or combination enhancements to indicate the preferred location for users to cross.

High-visibility crosswalks
High-visibility crosswalks use patterns
(i.e., bar pairs, continental, ladder)
that are visible to both the driver
and pedestrian from farther
away compared to traditional
transverse line crosswalks. They
should be considered at all
midblock pedestrian crossings and
uncontrolled intersections. Agencies
should use materials such as inlay or
thermoplastic tape, instead of paint
or brick, for highly reflective crosswalk
markings.

Improved Lighting
The goal of crosswalk lighting
should be to illuminate with positive
contrast to make it easier for a driver
to visually identify the pedestrian.

This involves carefully placing the
luminaires in forward locations to
avoid a silhouette effect of the
pedestrian.

Enhanced Signing and
Pavement Markings
On multilane roadways, agencies
can use “YIELD Here to Pedestrians”
or “STOP Here for Pedestrians”
signs 20 to 50 feet in advance of
a marked crosswalk to indicate
where a driver should stop or yield to
pedestrians, depending on State law.

To supplement the signing, agencies
can also install a STOP or YIELD bar
(commonly referred to as “shark’s
teeth“) pavement markings.

In-street signing, such as “STOP Here
for Pedestrians” or “YIELD Here to
Pedestrians” may be appropriate on
roads with two- or three-lane roads
where speed limits are 30 miles per
hour or less.
40%
1 High-visibility crosswalks
can reduce pedestrian injury
crashes up to:
25%
3 Advance yield or stop
markings and signs can
reduce pedestrian
crashes up to:
42%
2 Intersection lighting can
reduce pedestrian crashes
up to:
1 Chen, L., C. Chen, and R. Ewing. The Relative Effectiveness of Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures at Urban Intersections - Lessons from a New York City Experience. (2012).
2 Elvik, R. and Vaa, T. Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Oxford, United Kingdom, Elsevier, (2004).
3 Zeeger et al. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments, FHWA, (2017).

Source: FHWA
W11-2, W16-7P
R1-6
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
ped_bike/step/docs/tech
Sheet_VizEnhancemt2018.pdf.

Safety Benefits:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
1 Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., “Handbook of Road Safety Measures.” Oxford, United Kingdom, Elsevier, (2004).

FHWA-SA-21-050
Lighting
The number of fatal crashes occurring in daylight is about the same as those that occur in darkness. However, the nighttime fatality rate is three times the daytime rate because only 25 percent of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) occur at night. At nighttime, vehicles traveling at higher speeds may not have the ability to stop once a hazard or change in the road ahead becomes visible by the headlights. Therefore, lighting can be applied continuously along segments and at spot locations such as intersections and pedestrian crossings in order to reduce the chances of a crash.

Adequate lighting (i.e., at or above minimum acceptable standards) is based on research recommending horizontal and vertical illuminance levels to provide safety benefits to all users of the roadway environment. Adequate lighting can also provide benefits in terms of personal security for pedestrians, wheelchair and other mobility device users, bicyclists, and transit users as they travel along and across roadways.

Applications
Roadway Segments
Research indicates that continuous
lighting on both rural and urban
highways (including freeways) has
an established safety benefit for
motorized vehicles.
1 Agencies can
provide adequate visibility of the
roadway and its users through the
uniform application of lighting that
provides full coverage along the
roadway and the strategic placement
of lighting where it is needed the most.

Intersections and Pedestrian
Crossings
Increased visibility at intersections at
nighttime is important since various
modes of travel cross paths at these
locations. Agencies should consider
providing lighting to intersections
based on factors such as a history of
crashes at nighttime, traffic volume,
the volume of non-motorized users,
the presence of crosswalks and raised
medians, and the presence of transit
stops and boarding volumes.

Considerations
Most new lighting installations are
made with breakaway features,
shielded, or placed far enough
from the roadway to reduce
the probability and/or severity
of fixed-object crashes. Modern
lighting technology gives precise
control with minimal excessive
light affecting the nighttime sky or
spilling over to adjacent properties.

Agencies can equitably engage
with underserved communities to
determine where and how new and
improved lighting can most benefit
the community by considering their
priorities, including eliminating crash
disparities, connecting to essential
neighborhood services, improving
active transportation routes, and
promoting personal safety.

Source: WSDOT
28%
for nighttime injury crashes
on rural and urban
highways.1
42%
for nighttime injury pedestrian
crashes at intersections.1
33-38%
for nighttime crashes at rural
and urban intersections.1
Source: FHWA
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/night_visib/
roadwayresources.cfm.

Safety Benefits:

Lighting can reduce
crashes up to:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Pavement Friction
Management
Friction is a critical characteristic of a pavement that affects how vehicles interact with the roadway, including the frequency of crashes. Measuring, monitoring, and maintaining pavement friction—especially at locations where vehicles are frequently turning, slowing, and stopping—can prevent many roadway departure, intersection, and pedestrian-related crashes.

Pavement friction treatments, such as High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST), can be better targeted and result in more efficient and effective installations when using continuous pavement friction data along with crash and roadway data.

Continuous Pavement Friction
Measurement
Friction data for safety performance
is best measured with Continuous
Pavement Friction Measurement
(CPFM) equipment. Spot friction
measurement devices, like locked-
wheel skid trailers, cannot safely and
accurately collect friction data in
curves or intersections, where the
pavement polishes more quickly and
adequate friction is so much more
critical. Without CPFM equipment,
agencies will assume the same
friction over a mile or more.

CPFM technology measures friction
continuously at highway speeds and
provides both network and segment
level data. Practitioners can analyze
the friction, crash, and roadway data
to better understand and predict
where friction-related crashes will
occur to better target locations and
more effectively install treatments.
1 High Friction Surface Treatment
HFST consists of a layer of durable,
anti-abrasion, and polish-resistant
aggregate over a thermosetting
polymer resin binder that locks the
aggregate in place to restore or
enhance friction and skid resistance.

Calcined bauxite is the aggregate
shown to yield the best results
and should be used with HFST
applications.

Applications
HFST should be applied in locations
with increased friction demand,
including:
• Horizontal curves.
• Interchange ramps.
• Intersection approaches.
o Higher-speed signalized and
stop-controlled intersections.
o Steep downward grades.
• Locations with a history of rear-end,
failure to yield, wet-weather, or red-
light-running crashes.
• Crosswalk approaches.

Considerations
• HFST is applied on existing pavement,
so no new pavement is added.
• If the underlying pavement
structure is unstable, then the
HFST life cycle may be shortened,
resulting in pre-mature failure.
• The automated installation method
is preferred as it minimizes issues
often associated with manual
installation: human error due to
fatigue, inadequate binder mixing,
improper and uneven binder
thickness, delayed aggregate
placement, and inadequate
aggregate coverage.
• The cost can be reduced when
bundling installations at multiple
locations.

FHWA-SA-21-052
Automated application of HFST.

Source: FHWA
HFST can reduce
crashes up to:
for injury crashes at ramps.2
63%
for injury crashes at
horizontal curves.2
48%
for total crashes at
intersections.3
20%
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/pavement_
friction/high_friction/.

Safety Benefits:
1 Izeppi et al. Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment as a Tool for Improving Crash Rate Prediction: A Pilot Study. Virginia Department of Transportation, (2016).
2 Merritt et al. Development of Crash Modification Factors for High Friction Surface Treatments. FHWA, (2020).
3 NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, (2008).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
47%
for pedestrian crashes.4
98%
(varies by speed limit, number
of lanes, crossing distance,
and time of day).3
FHWA-SA-21-053
Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
A marked crosswalk or pedestrian warning sign can improve safety for pedestrians crossing the road, but at times may not be sufficient for drivers to visibly locate crossing locations and yield to pedestrians. To enhance pedestrian conspicuity and increase driver awareness at uncontrolled, marked crosswalks, transportation agencies can install a pedestrian actuated Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) to accompany a pedestrian warning sign. RRFBs consist of two, rectangular- shaped yellow indications, each with a light-emitting diode (LED)-array-based light source. 1 RRFBs flash with an alternating high frequency when activated to enhance conspicuity of pedestrians at the crossing to drivers.

For more information on using RRFBs, see the Interim Approval in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
1 1 MUTCD Interim Approval 21 - RRFBs at Crosswalks.
2 “Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon” in PEDSAFE: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System. FHWA, (2013).
3 Fitzpatrick et al. “Will You Stop for Me? Roadway Design and Traffic Control Device Influences on Drivers Yielding to Pedestrians in a Crosswalk with a Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon.” Report No. TTI-CTS-0010. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, (2016).
4 NCHRP Research Report 841 Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments, (2017).

Applications
The RRFB is applicable to many
types of pedestrian crossings but is
particularly effective at multilane
crossings with speed limits less
than 40 miles per hour.
2 Research
suggests RRFBs can result in motorist
yielding rates as high at 98 percent
at marked crosswalks, but varies
depending on the location, posted
speed limit, pedestrian crossing
distance, one- versus two-way road,
and the number of travel lanes.
3 RRFBs can also accompany school or
trail crossing warning signs.

RRFBs are placed on both sides of
a crosswalk below the pedestrian
crossing sign and above the
diagonal downward arrow plaque
pointing at the crossing.
1 The flashing
pattern can be activated with
pushbuttons or passive (e.g., video or
infrared) pedestrian detection, and
should be unlit when not activated.

Considerations
Agencies should:
2 • Install RRFBs in the median rather
than the far-side of the roadway
if there is a pedestrian refuge or
other type of median.
• Use solar-power panels to eliminate
the need for a power source.
• Reserve the use of RRFBs for
locations with significant pedestrian
safety issues, as over-use of RRFB
treatments may diminish their
effectiveness.

Agencies shall not:
2 • Use RRFBs without the presence of
a pedestrian, school or trail crossing
warning sign.
• Use RRFBs for crosswalks across
approaches controlled by YIELD
signs, STOP signs, traffic control
signals, or pedestrian hybrid
beacons, except for the approach
or egress from a roundabout.

RRFBs used at a trail crossing.

Source: LJB
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safe-
ty Countermeasures, please
visit https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/
and https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/ped_bike/step/docs/
techSheet_RRFB_2018.pdf.

Safety Benefits:

RRFBs can reduce
crashes up to:

RRFBs can increase motorist
yielding rates up to:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Speed
Safety Cameras
Safe Speeds is a core principle of the Safe System Approach since humans are less likely to survive high-speed crashes. Enforcing safe speeds has been challenging; however, with more information and tools communities can make progress in reducing speeds. Agencies can use speed safety cameras (SSCs) as an effective and reliable technology to supplement more traditional methods of enforcement, engineering measures, and education to alter the social norms of speeding. SSCs use speed measurement devices to detect speeding and capture photographic or video evidence of vehicles that are violating a set speed threshold.

Applications
Agencies should conduct a network
analysis of speeding-related crashes
to identify locations to implement
SSCs. The analysis can include scope
(e.g., widespread, localized), location
types (e.g., urban/suburban/rural,
work zones, residential, school zones),
roadway types (e.g., expressways,
arterials, local streets), times of day, and
road users most affected by speed-
related crashes (e.g., pedestrians,
bicyclists).

SSCs can be deployed as:
• Fixed units—a single, stationary
camera targeting one location.
• Point-to-Point (P2P) units—multiple
cameras to capture average speed
over a certain distance.
• Mobile units—a portable camera,
generally in a vehicle or trailer.

The table below describes suitable
circumstances for SSC deployment.
1 Considerations
• SSCs can produce a crash reduction
upstream and downstream, thus
generating a spillover effect.2
• Public trust is essential for any type of
enforcement. With proper controls in
place, SSCs can offer fair and
equitable enforcement of speeding,
regardless of driver age, race, gender,
or socio-economic status. SSCs should
be planned with community input and
equity impacts in mind.
• Using both overt (i.e., highly visible)
and covert (i.e., hidden) enforcement
may encourage drivers to comply with
limits everywhere, not only at sites they
are aware are enforced.
• Agencies should conduct
evaluations regularly to determine if
SSCs are accomplishing safety goals
and whether changes in strategy,
scheduling, communications, or public
engagement are necessary.
• Agencies should conduct a legal
and policy review to determine if SSCs
are authorized within a jurisdiction and
how the authorization and other traffic
laws will affect a SSC program.
• Agencies should develop an SSC
program plan with consideration of
the USDOT SSC guidelines for planning,
public involvement, stakeholder
coordination, implementation,
maintenance, evaluation, etc.
3 FHWA-SA-21-070
Fixed units can reduce
crashes on urban
principal arterials up to:
for all
crashes.454%
for injury
crashes.
447%
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
speedmgt/.

Safety Benefits:

Considerations for Selection Fixed P2P Mobile
Problems are long-term and site-specific. X X —
Problems are network-wide, and shift based on enforcement efforts. — — X Speeds at enforcement site vary largely from downstream sites. — X X Overt enforcement is legally required. X X X
Sight distance for the enforcement unit is limited. X X — Enforcement sites are multilane facilities. X X —
1 Thomas et al. Speed Safety Camera Program Planning and Operations Guide. FHWA, (2021). 2 Montella et al. “Effects on speed and safety of point-to-point speed enforcement systems”.

Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 75, (2015). Note that this is an international study. 3 Speed Enforcement Camera Systems Operational Guidelines. NHTSA, (2008). 4 Shin et al. “Evaluation of the Scottsdale Loop 101 automated speed enforcement demonstration program.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, (2009). 5 Li et al. “A Before-and-After Empirical Bayes Evaluation of Automated Mobile Speed Enforcement on Urban Arterial Roads.” Presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper No. 15-1563, Washington, D.C., (2015).

Note that this is an international study.
6 Automated Speed Enforcement Program Report 2014-2017. New York City DOT, (2018).

In New York City, fixed units
reduced speeding in school
zones up to 63% during
school hours.6
P2P units can reduce crashes on
urban expressways, freeways,
and principal arterials up to:
for fatal and injury crashes.2
37%
Mobile units can reduce
crashes on urban principal
arterials up to:
for fatal and injury crashes.5
20%
The contents of this Fact Sheet do not have the
force and effect of law and are not meant to
bind the public in any way. This Fact Sheet is
intended only to provide clarity regarding existing
requirements under the law or agency policies.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Variable Speed
Limits
Selecting appropriate speed limits on roadways is important in maintaining a safe and efficient transportation network. Speed limits are established with an engineering study based on inputs like traffic volumes, operating speeds, roadway characteristics, and crash history. However, conditions on the roadway are susceptible to change in a short amount of time (e.g., congestion, crashes, weather). Drivers typically determine their operating speeds under normal weather conditions on a straight roadway section with good pavement quality and adequate sight distances. If ideal conditions do not exist and the roadway does not meet the driver’s expectations, there is a greater chance that a driver error could result in a crash. Providing variable speeds limits (VSLs) capable of adapting to changing circumstances could reduce crash frequency and severity.

Speed management strategies, including VSLs, are integral to the Safe Speeds element of the Safe System Approach. Because humans are unlikely to survive high-speed crashes, VSLs reduce speeds so that human injury tolerances are accommodated in three ways: improving visibility, providing additional time for drivers to stop, and reducing impact forces.

Applications
VSLs use prevailing information on the
roadway, like traffic speed, volumes,
weather, and road surface conditions,
to determine appropriate speeds
and display them to drivers. This
strategy improves safety performance
and traffic flow by reducing speed
variance (i.e., improving speed
harmonization). VSLs may also improve
driver expectation by providing
information in advance of slowdowns
and potential lane closures, which
could reduce the probability for
secondary crashes. VSLs can mitigate
adverse weather conditions or to slow
faster-moving traffic as it approaches
a queue or bottleneck.

Agencies can implement VSLs for
the following applications:

CONGESTION INCIDENTS

WORK ZONES INCLEMENT WEATHER
Considerations
• Particularly effective on urban and
rural freeways and high-speed arterials
with posted speed limits greater than
40 mph.
• Often implemented as part of Active
Traffic Management (ATM) plans
or incorporated into existing Road
Weather Information Systems.
• When used with ATM, VSLs can
mitigate rear-end, sideswipe,
and other crashes on high-speed
roadways.
• May be implemented as a regulatory
and/or an advisory system.
• Can be applied to an entire roadway
segment or individual lanes.

Source: WSDOT
34%
for total crashes.1
65%
for rear-end crashes.1
51%
for fatal and injury crashes.1
1 Avelar et al. Developing Crash Modification Factors for Variable Speed Limit. FHWA, (2020).
9:1- 40:1
Benefit/Cost Ratios
range between1
FHWA-SA-21-054
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
speedmgt/ref_mats/.

Safety Benefits:

VSLs can reduce crashes
on freeways up to:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
37%
for non-intersection, fatal
and injury crashes on rural,
two-lane roads.2
FHWA-SA-21-055
Wider Edge Lines
Roadway departures account for over half of all traffic fatalities in the United States. If drivers cannot clearly identify the edge of the travel lanes and see the road alignment ahead, the risk of roadway departure may be greater.

Wider edge lines enhance the visibility of travel lane boundaries compared to traditional edge lines. Edge lines are considered “wider” when the marking width is increased from the minimum normal line width of 4 inches to the maximum normal line width of 6 inches.
1 Applications
Wider edge lines increase drivers’
perception of the edge of the
travel lane and can provide a
safety benefit to all facility types
(e.g., freeways, multilane divided
and undivided highways, two-lane
highways) in both urban and rural
areas.
2 Wider edge lines are most
effective in reducing crashes on
rural two-lane highways, especially
for single-vehicle crashes.
3 Agencies
should also consider implementing
a systemic approach to wider edge
line installation based roadway
departure crash risk factors. Potential
risk factors for two-lane rural roads
include:
• Pavement and shoulder widths.
• Presence of curves.
• Traffic volumes.
• History of nighttime crashes.

Considerations
• Wider edge lines are relatively
low cost.
• Wider edge lines can be
implemented using existing
equipment during maintenance
procedures like re-striping and
resurfacing, with the only cost
increase being the additional
material.
• Paint may have a lower initial cost,
but more durable materials (e.g.,
thermoplastic) may result in a
lower life cycle cost based on their
longer service life.
• As the number of automated
vehicles increases on roadways,
wider edge lines may provide
better guidance for these
vehicles’ sensors.

Source: Texas Transportation Institute
22%
for fatal and injury crashes
on rural freeways.3
1 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Section 3A.06. FHWA, (2009). 2 Park et al. “Safety effects of wider edge lines on rural, two-lane highways. ” Accident Analysis and Prevention
Vol. 48, pp.317-325, (2012).
3 Potts et al. Benefit/Cost Evaluation of MoDOT’s Total Striping and Delineation Program: Phase II. Missouri Department of Transportation, (2011). 4 Abdel-Rahim et al. Safety Impacts of Using Wider Pavement Markings on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Idaho. Idaho Transportation Department, (2018). 25:1
Benefit Cost Ratio
for fatal and serious injury
crashes on two-lane rural
roads.4
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/night_visib/
pavement-markings.cfm.

Wider edge lines can
reduce crashes up to:

Safety Benefits:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix D: Jurupa Valley Capital Improvement Program List

FISCAL YEAR 2021/22—2025/26

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
Transmittal Message..………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Resolution of the City Council……………………………………………………………………..……………… 3

SUMMARIES
Project Summary with Revenue Source…………………………………………………………………….. 5 Funding Summary………………………………….…………………………………………………………………. 9

PROJECTS
Market St. Bridge, Crossing Santa Ana River…………………………………………………………………. 13-H.1 Mission Blvd. Bridge, Crossing Santa Ana River……………………………………………………………. 13-H.2 Bain St. Pavement Rehabilitation, Limonite to Bellegrave……….…………….……………………… 16-A.2 Traffic Signal Installation, Pedley and Jurupa……….…………….………….…………….………………. 16-C.2 Certificates of Participation (COP) Series 2016A – Debt Service……….…………….…………….. 16-F Van Buren Blvd. Widening, Santa Ana River to Limonite……….…………….…………………….…. 17-B.1 Limonite Ave. Widening, Bain to Homestead……….…………….………….…………….…………….… 17-B.2 Rubidoux Blvd./SR60 Interchange Improvements……….…………….………….……………………… 17-B.3 Jurupa Rd./Van Buren Blvd. Grade Separation……….…………….………….…………….…………….. 17-B.5 Mission Blvd. and Valley Way Intersection Improvements……….…………….………….………… 18-C.1 Granite Hill Dr. Pavement Rehabilitation, Pyrite to Edgewood Point…………………………….. 19103 Pacific Ave. SR2S Sidewalk Project, Mission to 45th……….…………….………….…………….……… 19106 Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure……………………………………………………………….. 19107 Market St. Widening, Santa Ana River to Rubidoux……….…………….………….…………….….…. 19108 Mission Blvd. and Rubidoux Blvd. Intersection Improvements……….…………….………….…... 19109 Master Plan of Streets………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 19110 Traffic Signal Installation, Ben Nevis and Pedley…………………………………………………………… 19111 Citywide Guardrail Replacement…………………………………………………………………………………… 19112 2020-2021 CDBG – Mission Blvd. ADA Improvements, Ben Nevis to Valley Way….……….. 20102 Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 1, Pyrite to Valley Way……..…………………….. 20103

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT’D
2020-2021 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD…………………………………………….. 20106 2020-2021 CDBG – Pacific Ave. Street Improvement Project, Mission to SR60……………. 20107 Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)……………………………………………………………………………………….. 20108 2021-2022 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Rubidoux Blvd. – SR60 to 29th, Limonite Ave. – Felspar to Pedley, Jurupa Rd. – Agate to Galena……………………………………………….. 21101
2021-2022 CDBG – Old Mira Loma Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 1, 50th, 48th, Martin, Troth, Marlatt, Dodd………………………………………………………………………………………………...…..

21102
Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 2, Bellegrave to Pyrite…………….……….…….. 21103 2021-2022 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD…………………………….……..………… 21104 2021-2022 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD….……………………………………………………. 21105 Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd. Gap Closure………………………………………………………………………... 21106 Bellegrave Ave. Widening, Cantu Galleano Ranch to Van Buren…………………………………… 21107 Riverside Dr. Widening – I-15 to Wineville…………………………………………………………………… 21108 2021-2022 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locatiosn TBD…………………………………………………………….. 21109 Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 3, Ben Nevis to Bellegrave…………………….. 21110 Van Buren Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 3, Bellegrave to Etiwanda…………………… 21111 Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Safety Upgrades…………………………………………… 21112 Mission Blvd. Street Improvements, Pyrite to Roughly 1,300’ East………………………………. 21113 2022-2023 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………………………………………………….. 22101 2022-2023 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………………………………. 22102 2022-2023 CDBG – Old Mira Loma Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 2, 58th, 56th, 54th, Ridgeview, Troth, Marlatt, Dodd……………………………………………………………………………………

22103
2022-2023 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 22104 2022-2023 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD……………………………………………………….. 22105 Sierra Ave, Armstrong to City Limits and /or Armstrong Rd, Sierra to City Limits Roundabout Study and Installation……………………………………………………………………………….

22106
2023-2024 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………..……………………………………….. 23101 2023-2024 CDBG – Glen Avon Area Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………. 23102 2023-2024 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 23103 2023-2024 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD………………………………………………………. 23104 2023-2024 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD……………………………………… 23105 2024-2025 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………………………………………………….. 24101

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT’D

2024-2025 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………………………………. 24102 2024-2025 CDBG – Country Village Rd. Pavement Rehabilitation, Granite Hill to San Sevaine Channel……………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. 24103
2024-2025 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 24104 2024-2025 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD………………………………………………………. 24105 2025-2026 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………………………………………………….. 25101 2025-2026 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………………………………. 25102 2025-2026 CDBG – San Sevaine Way Pavement Rehabilitation, Etiwanda to Mission…... 25103 2025-2026 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 25104 2025-2026 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD………………………………………………………. 25105 Valley Way and Jurupa Rd. Realignment………………………………………………………………………. TBD 58th St. Gap Closure……………………………………………………………………………………………………… TBD Camino Real Widening/Intersection Improvements, Jurupa Rd. to 700’ South…………….. TBD Daly Ave. Storm Drain Improvements………………………………………………………………………….. TBD Pacific Ave. Storm Drain Improvements……………………………………………………………………….. TBD

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026
1 TRANSMITTAL MESSAGE

Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and Residents of Jurupa Valley:

On behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley staff I am proud to transmit the FY 202 1-2022 to FY 2025- 2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This document is the result of several internal review meetings and previous City Council direction. All projects presented in this budget have been carefully examined to ensure the community’s capital improvement needs are met both now and in the future. You w ill find this CIP has been developed with a balance between the infrastructure needs of the community and the City’s financial capacity.

The CIP is a five-year planning instrument used to identify and coordinate the financing and timing of public improvem ents. The first year of this program is the capital budget you will see in the City’s overall operating budget. Projects slated for subsequent years in the program are for planning purposes only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are alloc ated funding in a future capital budget.

The City’s goal in providing a CIP budget is to develop a multi -year plan for capital improvement, update it annually and follow through with all capital improvements in accordance with the plan. In determining the relative merit of a proposed project, key management team members evaluate projects for feasibility, community enhancement, infrastructure preservation and safety.

City staff identifie d the community’s capital needs for each fiscal year, evaluated antici pated funding availability and presents a proposed CIP for the City Council’s consideration and direction to staff. The focus of the CIP is to combine a comprehensive planning document that identifies revenues with the capital projects expenditure budget. The document also augments the existing capital projects budget information and facilitates the long -range capital projects planning process.

The CIP includes a total of $ 127,597,526 in identified capital projects, with available funding of $64,398,726. There is $ 63,198,800 in “Unspecified” project funding , indicating that a revenue source has not been identified for these projects. There are 35 projects which are scheduled to begin design, construction and/or be completed in FY 2021-2022. These projects are intended to enhance the safety and quality of life for all citizens in the City of Jurupa Valley. The following is a list of some highlighted projects contained in the CIP:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026
2 • Van Buren Blvd. Widening, Santa Ana River to Limonite • Jurupa Rd. and Van Buren Blvd. Grade Separation
• Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure
• Market St. Widening, Santa Ana River to Rubidoux
• Citywide Guardrail Replacement
• Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 1 and 2, Bellegrave to Valley Way • Riverside Dr. Widening, I-15 to Wineville

The revenue estimates, although conservative, are strictly estimates. The actual amount of funds available for construction will vary based upon the state of the economy. The City Council will be updated throughout the year on the status of projects and co rresponding revenue sources.

The FY 202 1-2022 to FY 202 5-2026 Capital Improvement Program is a result of a total team effort of both City staff and City Council. I would like to thank staff and the City Council for all of the contributions that were made in developing the capital budget that will serve as the blueprint for Jurupa Valley’s future.

Sincerely,

Rod Butler
City Manager

PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
13-H.1 MARKET ST. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVER TUMF $ 502,200 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2 ,750,000 $ 2,704,198 $ - $ 7,956,398 13-H.2 MISSION BLVD. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVER Measure 'A' $ 566,621 $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 831,621 Measure 'A' $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135,000 Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - RMRA $ 73,537 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 73,537 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ 650,000 TOTAL $ 208,537 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ 858,537 16-C.2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, PEDLEY AND JURUPA DIF (Signals) $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 16-F CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) SERIES 2016A - DEBT SERVICE Measure 'A' $ - $ 1, 057,800 $ 1,060,000 $ 1,0 55,800 $ 1,059,250 $ 2,11 9,000 $ 6,351,850 TUMF $ - $ 5,525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,525,000 DIF (Trans.) $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 150,000 $ 5, 525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,675,000 TUMF $ - $ 400,000 $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 DIF (Trans.) $ 99,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 99,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500, 000 $ 7,500,000 TOTAL $ 99,000 $ 400,000 $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 8,849,0 00 DIF (Rialto) $ 183,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 183,000 TUMF $ - $ 617,000 $ - $ 1,542,914 $ - $ - $ 2,159,914 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000,0 00 $ 40,000,000 TOTAL $ 183,000 $ 617,000 $ - $ 1,542,914 $ - $ 40,000,000 $ 42,342,914 17-B.5 JURUPA RD. AND VAN BUREN BLVD. GRADE SEPARATION SB 132 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 18-C.1 MISSION BLVD. AND VALLEY WAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS DIF (Signals) $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 19103 GRANITE HILL DR. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, PYRITE TO EDGEWOOD POINT RMRA $ 445,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 445,000 CDBG $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 67 0,000 $ 670,000 TOTAL $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 670,000 $ 730,000 ATP $ 312,000 $ 2,46 6,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,778,000 Measure 'A' $ 34,500 $ 274,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 308,500 TOTAL $ 346,500 $ 2, 740,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,086,500 19108 MARKET ST. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO RUBIDOUX TUMF $ 140,000 $ 566,000 $ 3,417,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,123,00 0 19107
SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
19106

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
16-A.2
BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BELLEGRAVE
17-B.3
RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
17-B.1
VAN BUREN BLVD. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO LIMONITE
17-B.2
LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD
PACIFIC AVE. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS, 42ND TO MISSION 5 PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
19109 MISSION BLVD. AND RUBIDOUX BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS DIF (Signals) $ 189,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 189,000 DIF (Trans.) $ 77,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77,500 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 77,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77,500 19111 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, BEN NEVIS AND PEDLEY DIF (Signals) $ 322,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 322,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Gas Tax $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 HSIP $ - $ 509,200 $ - $ - $ - $ 509,200 TOTAL $ - $ 574,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 574,200 20102 2020-2021 CDBG - MISSION BLVD. ADA IMPROVEMENTS, BEN NEVIS TO VALLEY WAY CDBG $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 RMRA $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 Measure 'A' $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 TOTAL $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 20106 2020-2021 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 20107 2020-2021 CDBG - PACIFIC AVE.STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, MISSION TO SR60 CDBG $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 LRSP $ 36,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,000 Measure 'A' $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000 TOTAL $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 RMRA $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 TOTAL $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 21102 2021-2022 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, 50TH, 48TH, MARTIN, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD CDBG $ - $ 946,406 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 946,406 RMRA $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 TOTAL $ - $ 1,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,700,000 21104 2021-2022 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 21105 2021-2022 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 TUMF $ - $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 76,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60 0,000 $ 600,000 $ - $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 676,000 2021-2022 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, RUBIDOUX BLVD. - SR60 TO 29TH, LIMONITE AVE. - FELSPAR TO PEDLEY, JURUPA RD. - AGATE TO GALENA 21101
20103
MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, PYRITE TO VALLEY WAY 21103
MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, BELLEGRAVE TO PYRITE 21106
CANTU GALLEANO RANCH RD. GAP CLOSURE
20108

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

MASTER PLAN OF STREETS
19112

CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT
19110
6 PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
TUMF $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 140,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 67 5,000 $ 675,000 $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 675,000 $ 815,000 21108 RIVERSIDE DR. WIDENING - I-15 TO WINEVILLE MLRBBD $ - $ 1, 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 21109 2021-2022 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 80,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000 TOTAL $ - $ 80,000 $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,880,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 TOTAL $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ 2,100,000 $ - $ - $ 2,190,000 HSIP $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 Unspecified $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 TOTAL $ - $ 250,000 $ 4,457,600 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,707,600 21113 MISSION BLVD. STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PYRITE TO ROUGHLY 1,300' EAST Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000, 000 $ 2,000,000 22101 2022-2023 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ 70 0,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 CDBG $ - $ - $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 850,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 22104 2022-2023 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 22105 2022-2023 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Gas Tax $ - $ - $ 100,00 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 350,000 23101 2023-2024 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 23102 2023-2024 CDBG - GLEN AVON AREA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD CDBG $ - $ - $ - $ 875,000 $ - $ - $ 875,000 21111
VAN BUREN BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 3, BELLEGRAVE TO ETIWANDA 22106

SIERRA AVE, ARMSTRONG TO CITY LIMITS AND/OR ARMSTRONG RD, SIERRA TO CITY

LIMITS ROUNDABOUT STUDY AND INSTALLATION
22103
2022-2023 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, 58TH, 56TH, 54TH, RIDGEVIEW, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD
21110
MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 3, BEN NEVIS TO BELLEGRAVE 21107
BELLEGRAVE AVE. WIDENING - CANTU GALLEANO RANCH TO VAN BUREN 22102
2022-2023 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 21112

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SAFETY UPGRADES 7 PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
23103 2023-2024 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 23104 2023-2024 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 23105 2023-2024 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 24101 2024-2025 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,150,000 $ - $ 2,150,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,050,000 $ - $ 3,050,000 24103 2024-2025 CDBG - COUNTRY VILLAGE RD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, GRANITE HILL TO SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL CDBG $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 24104 2024-2025 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 24105 2024-2025 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 25101 2025-2026 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90 0,000 $ 900,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,100,000 $ 3,100,000 25103 2025-2026 CDBG - SAN SEVAINE WAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, ETIWANDA TO MISSION CDBG $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 925,000 $ 925,000 25104 2025-2026 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 25105 2025-2026 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 TBD VALLEY WAY AND JURUPA RD. REALIGNMENT Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD 58TH ST. GAP CLOSURE Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD CAMINO REAL WIDENING/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, JURUPA RD. TO 700' SOUTH Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 TBD DALY AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD PACIFIC AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 TOTAL 5,659,358 $ 19,227,406 $ 16,684,600 $ 10,173,714 $ 8,413,448 $ 67,439,000 $ 127,597,526 $ 24102
2024-2025 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 25102
2025-2026 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 8 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
19107 SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE $ 312,000 $ 2,466,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,778,000 $ 312,000 $ 2,466,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,778,000 19106 PACIFIC AVE. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMEN TS, 42ND TO MISSION $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 20102 2020-2021 CDBG - MISSION BLVD. ADA IMPROVEMENT S, BEN NEVIS TO VALLEY WAY $ 25,0 00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 20107 2020-2021 CDBG - PACIFIC AVE. STREET IMPROVEME NT PROJECT, MISSION TO SR60 $ 450,00 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 21102 2021-2022 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, 50TH, 48TH, MARTIN, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD $ - $ 946,406 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 946,406 22103 2022-2023 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, 58TH, 56TH, 54TH, RIDGEVIEW, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD $ - $ - $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 850,000 23102 2023-2024 CDBG - GLEN AVON AREA PAVEMENT REHAB ILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 875,000 $ - $ - $ 875,000 24103 2024-2025 CDBG - COUNTRY VILLAGE RD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, GRANITE HILL TO SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 25103 2025-2026 CDBG - SAN SEVAINE WAY PAVEMENT REHA BILITATION, ETIWANDA TO MISSION $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 925,000 $ 925,000 $ 535,000 $ 946,406 $ 850,000 $ 875,00 0 $ 900,000 $ 925,0 00 $ 5,031,406 17-B.3 RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEME NTS $ 183,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 183,000 $ 183,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 183,000 16-C.2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, PEDLEY AND JURUP A $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 18-C.1 MISSION BLVD. AND VALLEY WAY INTERSECTION IMP ROVEMENTS $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 19109 MISSION BLVD. AND RUBIDOUX BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $ 189,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 189,000 19111 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, BEN NEVIS AND PED LEY $ 322,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 322,000 20106 2020-2021 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 21104 2021-2022 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 22104 2022-2023 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 23103 2023-2024 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 24104 2024-2025 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 25104 2025-2026 MISC. TRAFFIC SINAL UPGRADES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 866,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,00 0 $ 250,000 $ 250,0 00 $ 2,116,000 17-B.1 VAN BUREN BLVD. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO LIMONITE $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 17-B.2 LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD $ 99,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 99,000 19110 MASTER PLAN OF STREETS $ 77,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77,500 $ 326,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 326,500

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - SIGNALS

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - RIALTO SETTLEMENT

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
9 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY
16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 19112 CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 21105 2021-2022 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 22105 2022-2023 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 22106 SIERRA AVE, ARMSTRONG TO CITY LIMITS AND/OR ARMSTRONG RD, SIERRA TO CITY LIMITS ROUNDABOUT STUDY AND INSTALLATION $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 23104 2023-2024 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 24105 2024-2025 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 25105 2025-2026 MISC. DRAINAGE REPARS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 215,000 $ 250,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 915,000 19112 CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT $ - $ 509,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 509,200 21112 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SAFET Y UPGRADES $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 $ - $ 634,200 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,863,000 20108 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) $ 36,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,000 13-H.2 MISSION BLVD. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVE R $ 566,621 $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 831,621 16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135,000 16-F CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) SERIES 2016 A - DEBT SERVICE $ - $ 1,057,800 $ 1,060,000 $ 1,0 55,800 $ 1,059,250 $ 2,11 9,000 $ 6,351,850 19107 SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE $ 34,500 $ 274,0 00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 308,500 19112 CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 20103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, PYRITE TO VALLEY WAY $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 20108 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000 21101 2021-2022 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, RUBIDOUX BLVD. - SR60 TO 29TH, LIMONITE AVE. - FELSPAR TO PEDLEY, JURUPA RD. - AGATE TO GALENA $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 21103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.2, BELLEGRAVE TO PYRITE $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 21109 2021-2022 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 21110 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3, BEN NEVIS TO BELLEGRAVE $ - $ 80,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000 21111 VAN BUREN BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3 , BELLEGRAVE TO ETIWANDA $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 22101 2022-2023 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 22102 2022-2023 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 23101 2023-2024 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000

GAS TAX

HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)

MEASURE 'A'

LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
10 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY
23105 2023-2024 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 24101 2024-2025 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 24102 2024-2025 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 25101 2025-2026 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 25102 2025-2026 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 940,121 $ 2,916,800 $ 2,460,000 $ 2,255,800 $ 2,259,250 $ 3,319,000 $ 14,150,971 21108 RIVERSIDE DR. WIDENING - I-15 TO WINEVILLE $ - $ 1,850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 $ - $ 1,850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ 73,537 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 73,537 19103 GRANITE HILL DR. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, PYRI TE TO EDGEWOOD POINT $ 445,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 445,000 20103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, PYRITE TO VALLEY WAY $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 21101 2021-2022 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, RUBIDOUX BLVD. - SR60 TO 29TH, LIMONITE AVE. - FELSPAR TO PEDLEY, JURUPA RD. - AGATE TO GALENA $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 21111 VAN BUREN BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3 , BELLEGRAVE TO ETIWANDA $ - $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 21103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, BELLEGRAVE TO PYRITE $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 21110 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3, BEN NEVIS TO BELLEGRAVE $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 22102 2022-2023 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 22103 2022-2023 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, 58TH, 56TH, 54TH, RIDGEVIEW, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 24102 2024-2025 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,150,000 $ - $ 2,150,000 25102 2025-2026 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 1,818,537 $ 2,400,000 $ 2,050,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,150,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 12,718,537 17-B.5 JURUPA RD. AND VAN BUREN BLVD. GRADE SEPARATI ON $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 13-H.1 MARKET ST. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVER $ 502,200 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2, 750,000 $ 2,704,198 $ - $ 7,956,398 17-B.1 VAN BUREN BLVD. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO LIMONITE $ - $ 5,525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,525,000 17-B.2 LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD $ - $ 400,000 $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1 ,250,000 17-B.3 RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEME NTS $ - $ 617,000 $ - $ 1,542,914 $ - $ - $ 2,159,914 19108 MARKET ST. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO RUBIDO UX $ 140,000 $ 566,000 $ 3,417,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,123,000 21106 CANTU GALLEANO RANCH RD. GAP CLOSURE $ - $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 76,000 21107 BELLEGRAVE AVE. WIDENING, CANTU GALLEANO RANCH TO VAN BUREN $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 140,000 $ 642,200 $ 7,324,000 $ 6,267,000 $ 4,292,914 $ 2,704,198 $ - $ 21,230,312

ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA)
SENATE BILL 132
TUMF

MIRA LOMA RBBD (MLRBBD)
11 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY
16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ 650,000 17-B.2 LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 17-B.3 RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEME NTS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 19106 PACIFIC AVE. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMEN TS, 42ND TO MISSION $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 670,000 $ 670,000 19110 MASTER PLAN OF STREETS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 21106 CANTU GALLEANO RANCH RD. GAP CLOSURE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 600,000 21107 BELLEGRAVE AVE. WIDENING, CANTU GALLEANO RANCH TO VAN BUREN $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 675,000 $ 675,000 21112 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SAFET Y UPGRADES $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 21113 MISSION BLVD. STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PYRITE TO R OUGHLY 1,300' EAST $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 22106 SIERRA AVE, ARMSTRONG TO CITY LIMITS AND/OR ARMSTRONG RD, SIERRA TO CITY LIMITS ROUNDABOUT STUDY AND INSTALLATION $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 TBD VALLEY WAY AND JURUPA RD. REALIGNMENT $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD 58TH ST. GAP CLOSURE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD CAMINO REAL WIDENING/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, JURUPA RD. TO 700' SOUTH $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 TBD DALY AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD PACIFIC AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ 250,000 $ - $ 60,595,000 $ 63,198,800 TOTAL 5,659,358 $ 19,227,406 $ 16,684,600 $ 10,173,714 $ 8,413,448 $ 67,439,000 $ 127,597,526 $

UNSPECIFIED
12 Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM 14.I
ACC

EPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATIONS ALONG HALL STREET

AND MARKET STREET A LONG THE FRONTAGE OF THE WHEELER
UPFITTERS PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, NORTHEAST OF HALL ST.

AND 24TH STREET (REX 2353 LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY)
RECO

MMENDATION
It i
s recommended that the City Council:

1. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes along existing Hall Street public right -of-way as described on DED2 1- 005.

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication of DED21-005.

3. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes along existing Market Street public right-of-way as described on DED21- 006.

4. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication of DED21-006.

BACKGROUND
A
t the Planning Commission Hearing on November 10, 2020, the Wheeler’s Upfitters development was conditionally approved. The project proposed to construct 25,910 square foot commercial building generally located on the south side of Market Street, north of 24 th Street and west of Hall Street. As part of the conditions of approval, the owner was required to dedicate right-of-way along Market Street and Hall Street in order to accommodate the designated ultimate right -of-way for those streets by the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

The applicant submitted the required offer of dedication documents , staff reviewed the documents, and found them in compliance with the California Government Code (7050), local ordinances, and the conditions of approval for this development.

ANALYSIS

In anticipation of acceptance of the offers of dedications, staff prepared a Certificate of Acceptance as required by Government Code Section 27281. Acceptance of the offer s of dedication will grant the City with the rights over such land to improve and maintain the Market Street and Hall Avenue parkway to its ultimate General Plan designation.

FISCAL IMPACT

The applicant has completed the formation and annexation process into the City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C for the maintenance of improvements within the public right-of-way and is known as Zone Y . The property owners are responsible for the annual payments of the special assessment. The revenue from this special assessment will be deposited into City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C and will be used to pay for the maintenance of parkway landscape, streetlights, and catch basins . Both the revenue and expenses will be part of the City’s FY 2022-2023 Adopted Budget, and there is no anticipated impact to the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.J
AM
ENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR FY 2022-2023
RECO

MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement for Professional Services by and between the County of Riverside and the City of Jurupa Valley for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment in substantially the form attached and in such final form as approved by the City Attorney.

BAC

KGROUND
O
n June 7, 2018, the City entered into a professional services agreement (“Agreement”) with the County of Riverside (“County”) to provide various services. These services included roadway maintenance, drainage maintenance, special event support, engineering services, surveying, traffic signal maintenance, and other services as requested by the City.

The Agr
eement can be extended each year by mutual agreement between the City and the County. On July 18, 2019, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 extending the services through Fiscal Year 2019- 20. On June 18, 2020, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 extending the services through Fiscal year 2020-21. Most recently, on June 17, 2021, the City Council approved Amendment No. 3 extending the services for another year.

ANAL
YIS
A
s the City continues to develop and bring services in-house, the City has had to rely less on the County to provide the aforementioned professional services. While the City is no

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

longer utilizing most of the professional services, the City still relies on the County for traffic signal maintenance. Traffic signal maintenance services are critical and the County has consistently provided the necessary services. The County provides the service on a time and materials basis. The hourly billing rates for Fiscal Year 2022-23 are incorporated herein as Exhibit B-4 of the proposed Amendment No. 4.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The rates included in Amendment No. 4 are notably lower than Fiscal Year 2021-22 rates.

For the provision of traffic signal maintenance services , the approved City budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 includes a budget amount of $275,000. Additionally, when traffic signal maintenance and inspection services are needed as a result of development within the City, the charges for these services are recouped from the development and are not charged to the City.

For all other services , a specific scope and a corresponding fee will be requested on a task-by-task basis as provided in Section 3 of the Agreement . The services included in the Agreement are only provided as requested by the City and the City is not obligated to request any services. The necessary monies and source of funds for any requested tasks will be identified at the time the scope of the task is prepared.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement with County of Riverside

2. Provide alternate direction to staff

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.K
CO

NSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMEMT WITH RSG, INC. FOR AN

AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN-LIEU FEE STUDY
____________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION
That
the City Council approve a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) between the City of Jurupa Valley and RSG, Inc . in the amount of $10,000 and a total not to exceed amount of $54,135 for additional work on an affordable housing in-lieu fee study and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City.

BAC

KGROUND
O
n September 2, 2021, the City Council approved an Agreement with RSG, Inc. in the amount of $44,135 to conduct an Affordable Housing In- Lieu Fee Study in order to determine an appropriate fee the City could levy upon housing developers as an alternative to imposing an inclusionary housing requirement. The City currently does not have an inclusionary housing ordinance, but has been working with many recent housing development applicants to secure affordable housing as a component of approved projects. In some cases, the applicants are seeking to pay into a housing trust fund in- lieu of building affordable units on site.

O
n January 20, 2022, during a City Council Study Session, the City Council directed staff to analyze the feasibility of implementing an inclusionary housing requirement on housing development projects to ensure that affordable housing is either constructed in the City, or accounted for through the payment of in-lieu fees. RSG, Inc., prepared an Inclusionary Housing and In-lieu Fee Study and recommendation addressing the gap between market rate sales prices and rents for housing units in the City and sales prices and rents affordable to very low, low, and moderate income households. The study also contained a detailed analysis of the estimated development funding gap related to constructing the affordable units on site.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

At its Study Session on January 20, 2022, the City Council evaluated the potential impact of an in-lieu fee, as well as the data on inclusionary policies adopted by communities in the region. The consensus among Council members was to move forward with consideration of an inclusionary housing ordinance, but to set the inclusionary percentage and in-lieu fee at a level that more closely matches comparable cities in the region. The City Council also requested additional data needed before the item is scheduled for a future public hearing before the Planning Commission and City Council.

On June 22, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance establishing an inclusionary housing requirement for affordable housing and i n-lieu fee . The recommended resolution will be presented to the City Council at a future public hearing.

Due to the complex and ever-changing set of federal and state laws regarding compliance and advancements of affordable housing initiatives and policies, and additional work required to develop an affordable housing requirement and affordable housing in-lieu fee ordinace, an amendment to the cost of the Professional Services Agreement with RSG, Inc. is required. The amount for the First Amendment will be $10,000 for a total not to exceed contract amount of $54,135.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

It is recommended that $10,000 be appropriated for RSG's Professional S ervices Agreement for an affordable housing in-lieu fee study. The total amount of the agreement will not exceed $54,135 over the term of one year . The funding for this Amendment will be appropriated from the consulting services account in the Communit y Development Department FY 2022-2023 Budget.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Recommended Action
: That the City Council execute the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with RSG, Inc. for the completion of an affordable housing and in-lieu fee study in an amount of $10,000 and a total not to exceed amount of $54,135; or

2. Decline to approve the proposed First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with RSG, Inc. and give appropriate direction; or

3. Defer action and request additional information.

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.L
I

NITIATION OF ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO PROVISIONS

RELATED TO FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES TO COMPLY WITH SENATE
BILL 234
RECO

MMENDATION
That
the City Council initiate a Zoning Code Amendment to provisions related to Family Day Care homes to comply with Senate Bill 234.

BACKGROUND
On January 1, 2020, a Senate Bill became effective that would require the City to treat family day cares (small and large) as by -right residential uses. Senate Bill 234 (SB234) also:
1) Makes void any restriction in a written instrument relating to real property that forbids or restricts the sale, lease, or mortgage of a property for use or occupancy as a family daycare home;
2) Prohibits a local jursidicition from imposing a business license, fee, or tax for the privilege of operating a small or large family day care home; and 3) Allows local public entity to place restrictions on building heights, setback, or lot dimensions of a family daycare home, as long as those standards would be applied to other residential uses in the same zone as the family daycare home.

ANALYSIS
A review of the City’s existing zoning code confirmed there are inconsistencies with SB 234. For instance, the City’s existing zoning code requires a ministerial permit to establish a large family daycare home. Section 9.240.320 Family Day Care home established the application process and development standards. See Attachment 1. A ministerial permit process was permitted by State law, however, with the adoption of SB 234, this is not allowed. Therefore, an amendment is needed to make the code consistent with SB 234.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Created: 2022-06-08 13:49:16 [EST]
( Supp. No. 14)

Page 1 of 2 ends

Sec. 9.240.320. Family day care homes.

A. State preemption. Pursuant to the California Child Day Care Facilities Act (Health & Saf. Code Sections 1596.70 et seq., 1560.90 et seq. and 1597.30 et seq.), the California Legislature has declared that it is the public policy of the State of California to locate family day care homes for children in normal residential surroundings so as to give children a home environment which is conducive to healthy and safe development. It is the declared public policy of the state to provide children the same environment as would be found in a traditional home. The Legislature has further declared that this policy is a matter of statewide concern with the purpose of occupying the field to the exclusion of local zoning, building and fire codes and regulations governing the use or occupancy of single-family dwellings for family day care homes for children except as provided in Health and Safety Code Chapter 3.6 (Health & Saf. Code Section 1597.30 et seq.).

B. Small family day care homes. In accordance with the above-referenced state policies, the use of a lawfully occupied single-family dwelling as a small family day care home shall be a permitted use in all zones and shall not require any permit pursuant to this chapter.

C. Large family day care homes. In accordance with the above-referenced state policies, the use of a single- family dwelling for a large family day care home is permitted in any zone where single-family dwellings are permitted or conditionally permitted provided a large family day care home permit has been granted pursuant to the provisions of this section.

D. Accessory dwelling unit/guest quarter. No accessory dwelling unit or guest quarter may be used as a family day care home.

E. Large family day care home permit procedure. Enacted as part of the above-referenced state policies, Health and Safety Code Section 1597.46 provides that cities and counties shall not prohibit large family day care centers on lots zoned for single-family dwellings, but may require a nondiscretionary permit which shall be granted provided compliance with certain standards, restrictions and requirements is demonstrated. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 1597.46, the following procedures shall apply to large family day care home permits.
(1) Application. Every application for a large family day care home permit shall be made in writing to the Planning Department on the forms provided by the Planning Department, shall be accompanied by the filing fee set forth in County Ordinance No. 671 and shall include the following information:
(a) Name and address of the applicant and a statement that the applicant resides in the home where the day care will be conducted.
(b) The assessor's parcel number assigned to the property on which the home is situated (hereinafter, "the site".)
(c) A site development permit drawn to scale and in sufficient detail to clearly describe the following:
(i) The boundary and physical dimensions of the site. This may be hand drawn provided it is legible.
(ii) The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings, structures, walkways, yards, driveways and parking areas on the site and on the street in front of the site. (iii) A drawing with accurate dimensions of the sign proposed on the site, if any. (iv) Such additional information as shall be required by the application form. (2) Decision on permit. The Community Development Director shall, within forty-five (45) days of the filing of a complete permit application, approve a large family day care home permit if the approval

Created: 2022-06-08 13:49:16 [EST]
( Supp. No. 14)

Page 2 of 2 ends

standards of this chapter have been met; otherwise, the permit shall be denied. The decision of the Community Development Director shall be final. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1597.46(c), the approval of a large family day care home permit shall not be subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.).

F. Approval standards. No application for a large family day care home permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards, restrictions and requirements:
(1) The applicant shall obtain a valid state license to operate a large family day care home on the site within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the date of approval of a large family day care home permit. Within fourteen (14) days of issuance of the state license, the applicant shall provide a certified copy of the license to the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall ensure that the applicant has obtained a state license in a timely manner. If the applicant fails to obtain a valid state license to operate a large family day care home on the site or fails to provide a certified copy of the license to Community Development Director as provided above, the large family day care home permit shall not become effective and shall be void for all purposes. (2) The site shall be zoned for single-family dwellings. (3) The site shall provide at least two (2) off-street parking spaces, no more than one (1) of which may be provided in a garage or carport. These parking spaces may include spaces provided to meet residential parking requirements.
(4) The unloading and loading of vehicle occupants shall only be permitted on the driveway, approved parking area, or directly in front of the site and shall not unduly restrict traffic flow. Residences located on arterial streets shall provide a drop-off and pickup area designed to prevent vehicles from backing into the roadway.
(5) The applicant shall comply with all applicable State Fire Marshal regulations. (6) The site shall not be located within three hundred (300) feet of any other existing or approved large family day care home, small family day care home, board and care home, group home or halfway house measured property line to property line.
(7) To ensure the health and safety of children in family day care homes as specified within Health and Safety Code Sections 1597.30 and 1597.46, if the site has a swimming pool or spa, the pool or spa shall meet all current code regulations for fencing, gate latches, and alarms. (8) No more than fourteen (14) children, including children under age ten (10) who reside at the home, may be cared for at any large family day care home.
(9) Only one (1) large family day care home may be located on any lot. (10) An on-site identification sign may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of this chapter or may be approved with the large family day care home permit if submitted concurrently.

G. Revocation. If the applicant fails to comply with any requirement of this section or if the applicant ceases or suspends operation of the large family day care home for one (1) year or more, the permit may be revoked in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.240.340.
( Ord. No. 2021-03 , § 12, 2-4-2021; Ord. No. 2021-09 , § 4, 4-15-2021)

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.M
APP

ROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH T&B PLANNING FOR THE

PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
PROPOSED “VERNOLA RANCH” SPECIFIC PLAN ; CASE NUMBER:

MA22153 ( GPA22003, SP226A3, SP22001, TTM38504) ; LOCATION:

WEST OF PATS RANCH ROAD, EAST OF INTERSTATE 15 (I -15),

NORTH OF LIMONITE AVENUE, AND SOUTH OF BELLEGRAVE
AVENUE; (APPLICANT: MCCUNE & ASSOCIATES, INC.)
RECO

MMENDATION
That t
he City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an Agreement with T&B Planning for the completion of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed “Vernola Ranch” Specific Plan in an amount not to exceed $203,663 to be funded entirely by an advance deposit made by the applicant.

BAC

KGROUND
The A
pplicant (“Applicant” or “McCune & Associates, Inc. ”) is proposing a 153-acre master planned residential community located west of Pats Ranch Road, east of Interstate 15 (I -15), north of Limonite Avenue, and south of Bellegrave A venue, (S ee Exhibit A - Project Site Location Map).

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

EXHIBIT A. PROJECT SITE LOCATION

On June 17, 2021, the Applicant submitted a Pre-Application Review for staff to analyze and review the request to establish a new Specific Plan on the project site . On October 10, 2021, the project was presented at a City Council Study Session.

On June 23, 2022, the Applicant submitted the formal entitlement applications for the proposed “Vernola Ranch” Specific Plan . The entitlements for this project include a General Plan Amendment, new Specific Plan (replace the existing I-15 Specific Plan on the project site), and a Tentative Tract Map. The project would also include the repeal of the existing I-15 Specific Plan from the project site.

The proposed Vernola Ranch Specific Plan consists of:
• Over 1,500 residential units consisting of different housing products for a mix of incomes;
• 10 acres of public open spaces, parks, and recreation; and • A potential school site.

ANALYSIS
T&B Planning submitted the only proposal for EIR preparation services. Based on several important criteria, including the complexity of the proposed project , and the proposer’s ability to maintain work schedules, it is recommended that T&B Planning be awarded the contract for these services . The contract value including 10% contingency and reimbursable expenses (e.g. mailing, printing, or mileage) is $203,663.

ATTACHMENT NO.1
City Agreement for
Consulting Services with T&B Planning

-1-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND T&B PLANNING, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE VERNOLA RANCH SPECIFIC

PLAN PROJECT
(MASTER APPLICATION NO. 22153)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of July 7, 2022, between the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) and T&B Planning, Inc., a California corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term
This Agreement shall commence on July 7, 2022, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. Services
Consultant shall prepare a project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that meets all of the requirements set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statute and Guidelines (the “services”) for the Vernola Ranch Specific Plan Project (Master Application No. 22153), as the services and related tasks are described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance that is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Performance
Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. Payment
A. City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Quotation for Service, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Two Hundred Three Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Three Dollars ($203,663.00) for the total term of this Agreement, unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.

B. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council.

-2-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc
C. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.

Invoices shall be submitted between the first (1st) and fifteenth (15th) business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If City disputes any of consultant’s fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

5. Suspension or Termination of Agreement without Cause A. City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon Consultant at least ten (10) calendar days’ prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.

B. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to City. Upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section, Consultant will submit an invoice to City pursuant to Section 4.

6. Default of Consultant
A. Consultant’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to Consultant. If such failure by Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond Consultant’s control, and without fault or negligence of Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.

B. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve Consultant with written notice of the default. Consultant shall have (10) calendar days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. Ownership and Maintenance of Documents
A. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of

-3-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc
City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

B. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without Consultant’s permission. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.

8. Indemnification.

Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) with respect to any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively, “Claims” hereinafter), including, but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant’s duty to defend pursuant to this Section shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

9. Insurance Requirements.

A. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
a) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.

-4-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc
b) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
c) Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. If Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, workers’ compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. d) Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for Consultant’s profession. 2) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
a) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c) Workers’ Compensation as required by the State of
California; Employer’s Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.
d) Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. 3) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

B. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (“Additional Insured”) shall be covered as insured’s as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds.

-5-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc
2) For any claims related to this project, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.
4) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Consultant of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Consultant shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by City before work commences. As an alternative to City’s forms, Consultant’s insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

E. Modifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this Section.

10. Independent Contractor
A. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement.

Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,

-6-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc
employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

B. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

11. Legal Responsibilities
Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, state and federal ordinances, laws and regulations that in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws, and regulations. City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of Consultant to comply with this Section.

12. Confidentiality; Release of Information
A. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City’s prior written authorization.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager, or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the services performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

13. Assignment
Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without City’s prior written consent. City consents to the use of the sub-consultants described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub- consultants shall be borne by Consultant and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.

14. General Provisions
A. Notices
Any notices that either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, including, without limitation, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,

-7-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Boulevard
Jurupa Valley, California 92509
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant: T&B Planning, Inc.
3200 El Camino Real, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92509
Attention: Tracy Zinn
B. Licenses. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

C. Governing Law; Venue
1) City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 2) Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court’s judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

D. Prohibited Interest. No City officer or employee who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, Consultant, or Consultant’s sub-consultants, during his or her tenure or for one (1) year thereafter. Consultant hereby warrants and represents to City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of Consultant or Consultant’s sub-consultants on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

-8-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc
F. Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

G. Authority to Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

Chris Barajas, Mayor

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
T&B PLANNING, INC.

By:

Name: Tracy Zinn
Title: President

By:

Name:

Title: Secretary, Asst. Secretary, CFO, Asst.

Treasurer

[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]

-9-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

JN: 926-012

June 9, 2022

Kumail Raza, Associate Planner
Ernest Perea, CEQA Administrator
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Submitted electronically to: [email protected] and [email protected]

RE: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CEQA CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE VERNOLA RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT, CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.

Dear Mr. Raza and Mr. Perea:

T&B Planning, Inc. (dba T&B Planning) is pleased to present this proposal to provide CEQA Consulting services for the preparation of a Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that meets all of the requirements set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statute and Guidelines for the proposed Vernola Ranch Specific Plan Project (Project). T&B Planning will work under the supervision of the City to ensure that the EIR represents the independent judgment of the City.

We understand that the Project entails the development of a new Specific Plan and Specific Plan Amendment for Vernola Ranch, a residential community, north of Limonite Ave nue, south of Bellegrave Av enue, east of the Interstate 15 ( I-15) freeway, and west of Pats Ranch R oad. The Project proposes ap proximately 1,576 homes , recreation areas, a network of trails & parks, an internal street network, open space, landscaping, and street improvements on the approximately 153 gross acres site.

T&B Planning has been in business since 1974 and has served many public and private sector clients over our 46- year history, including the City of Jurupa Valley . Pursuant to the City’s Request for Proposals (RFP), the enclosed proposal consists of the foll owing exhibits, which concisely set forth our qualifications and professional methodology for completing services in a timely and efficient manner.

• UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH TO THE PROJECT AND

SCOPE OF SERVICES - EXHIBIT I
• ABILITY TO MEET PROJECT SCHEDULE - EXHIBIT IV
• LOCAL EXPERIENCE - EXHIBIT II • BUDGET- EXHIBIT V
• EXPERIENCE AND TIME COMMITMENT OF KEY

PERSONNEL- EXHIBIT III

Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. If you have questions or require any clarification pertaining to this proposal, please contact me at (714) 505-6360 ext. 126 by e-mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,
T&B Planning, Inc.

Tracy Zinn, President Nicole Morse, Esq., Vice President

Vernola Ranch Specific Plan EIR Proposal
Exhibit I: Understanding and Approach to the Project and Scope of Services

Page 2 ends

T&B Planning, Inc.

EXHIBIT I: UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH TO THE PROJECT AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

Understanding of the Project
Pursuant to the City’s RFP, the Project site includes several large undeveloped parcels previously occupied for agricultural uses. In 1993, the County of Riverside adopted the I -15 Corridor Specific Plan (SP No. 266), which included these parcels. The property is currently zoned within SP No. 266 for medium density residential (Planning Areas 10, 13, & 15) and industrial park (Planning Area 20).

The Project proposes a Specific Plan Amendment to remove Planning Areas 10, 13, 15, & 20 from the I-15 Corridor Specific Plan. The Project also proposes a new Specific Plan for Vernola Ranch, a residential community, north of Limonite Avenue, south of Bellegrave Avenue , east of the I -15 freeway, and west of Pats Ranch Roa d. The new Specific Plan will allow for high-quality and innovative development with a variety of public benefits. The Project proposes approximately 1,576 homes (single -family, multi -family, townhomes, and other housing types) recreation areas, a network of trails & parks, an internal street network, open space, landscaping, and street improvements on approximately 153 gross acre site. The Specific Plan will be divided into 20 Planning Areas to guide land use types and intensity. The Project also includes an overlay for a potential school site located at the northeast portion of the Project site.

In addition, the P roject is requesting a Change of Zone and General Plan Amendment to change from Medium Density Residential and Industrial Park to appropriate designations for proposed densities. A Tentative Tract Map will also be processed to subdivide the property and create the planning areas and phasing, which will include the additional ±39 acres south of the site (Commercial Planning Areas 11 & 12 of SP No. 266). However, pursuant to the RFP, it is our understanding that it has not been determined if the EIR will, or to what extent, it will cover the ±39 acres as no development is proposed in this area. As such, we will work with the City ensure that the ±39 acre area is appropriately analyzed in compliance with CEQA.

Approach to the Project and Scope of Services
Based on our review of the City’s RFP and our recent, prior experience preparing CEQA compliance documents for the City of Jurupa Valley, we do not propose any modifications to the scope of services set forth in the RFP dated May 27, 2022. Budget for Task 7 (Prepare Administrative Final EIR) assumes a light to moderate amount of public comment on the Draft EIR; if a large number of substantive comments are received that require written responses or revisions to produce a Final EIR, a budget augment may be necessary.

Assistance with Native American SB 18 and AB 52 consultation is not listed in the RFP, and our staff is available to assist the City with that process, if requested. Assistance with Native American consultation is not currently budgeted in this proposal outside of the 58 hours assumed under Task 10. Therefore, the approach, schedule, and budget provided herein reflect the tasks identified in the RFP provided by the City of Jurupa Valley without modification.

T&B Planning’s approach will be to prepare a thorough and objective EIR that has a high level of legal defensibility and contains mitigation measures that the project applicant can feasibly implement and that the City of Jurupa Valley can enforce.

Vernola Ranch Specific Plan EIR Proposal
Exhibit I: Understanding and Approach to the Project and Scope of Services

Page 3 ends

T&B Planning, Inc.

Our staff has a strong skill set in CEQA compliance for various project types, and also has familiarity with the City of Jurupa Valley through our preparation of CEQA compliance documents for other private applicant projects in the City. Pursuant to Task 3, our staff will review the Project’s “Planning Technical Reports” to ensure that each report has been prepared utilizing accurate and verifiable field techniques and professional work performance standards, and are prepared in conformance with all applicable CEQA requirements. T&B Planning will focus first on preparing the EIR sections that are not reliant on technical studies, as it is anticipated that many of the studies will still be under preparation or revision. Following completion of the technical studies, T&B Planning will prepare the EIR in accordance with the Checklist included as Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and following the structural format preferred by the City , with applicable Plans, Policies, and Programs (PPPs) and Project De sign Features (PDF) listed before Mitigation Measures (MMs). Due to T&B Planning’s extensive experience preparing EIRs, including those with a high degree of public scrutiny, our familiarity with the City of Jurupa Valley through our recent work on the BRE Space Center Mira Loma Logistics Project EIR, Aqua Mansa Road Development EIR, the Pilot Flying J Travel Center EIR, and the Rubidoux Commerce Center EIR, and our internal diligent quality control review and refinement process for all CEQA documents before delivery, we anticipate that the focus of City staff and City Attorney review cycles will be to recommend refinements that will bolster responsiveness to City concerns and the sensitivities of its decision-making bodies and constituents.

Quality Control and Project Management
For the proposed Project, a T&B Planning Principal-in-Charge will provide direction on strategic decision-making, provide expertise on highly sensitive or potentially litigious issues, and provide final quality control review of each deliverable before release to the City . Nicole Morse will be the Principal-in-Charge and has widespread experience in various project types, including residential. The T&B Planning Principal will serve as the day-to-day project manager and point -person for internal and external communications and project management. The Principal and analysts will work with the City to guide the project through its environmental compliance process and prepare and spearhead the preparation of the EIR. Other environmental analysts will also work on the EIR under Principal oversight.

Meeting Project Schedules and Budgets
We will be diligent in meeting the project schedule and completing services within budget. T&B Plan ning understands the importance of keeping CEQA projects on schedule and we will prioritize tasks in a manner that ensures the timely delivery of work products. Our internal philosophy is that the best defense against a scheduling delay is to be highly proactive and communicative from project initiation through project approval in order to quickly identify and overcome impediments that could otherwise materialize into a potential delay for the proposed Project.

Vernola Ranch Specific Plan EIR Proposal
Exhibit IV: Ability to Meet Project Schedule

Page 12 ends

T&B Planning, Inc.

EXHIBIT IV ABILITY TO MEET PROJECT SCHEDULE

T&B Planning understands the City’s expectation to complete the EIR in an expeditious and efficient manner and in a timeframe of 6 months with an EIR commencing date of June 2022 and public hearings held in late December 2022 or early 2023. Due to the need for a full scope EIR and a number of review cycles requested by the City in the RFP, we estimate that the schedule will be at least 1 4 months in length. This timeframe accounts for all City review cycles and CEQA required review periods. This schedule can be shortened by up 4 months if all of the technical reports are available at the time of contract execution and environmental topics could be scoped out from further review in the EIR through the NOP process.

T&B Planning shall provide the services se t forth in the RFP dated May 27, 2022 for the Veronal Ranch Specific Plan, pursuant to the following schedule.

Months 1-2
Task 1: Project Initiation
Task 2: Notice of Preparation
NOP Public Review (30 days)
Task 3: Technical Report Review
Task 4: Prepare Administrative Draft EIR
Task 10: Management and Coordination (ongoing)

Months 3-4
Task 4: Continue Preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR (includes 1st round City review/comment and associated revisions).

Task 10: Management and Coordination (ongoing)

Months 5-6
Task 4: Complete Preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR (includes 2nd round City review/comment and associated revisions)
Task 5: Prepare Public Review Draft EIR (includes two (2) rounds of review) Task 10: Management and Coordination (ongoing)

Months 7-9
Task 6: Circulation of the EIR and Public Notification
DEIR Public Review (45 days)
Task 10: Management and Coordination (ongoing)

Month 10
Task 7: Prepare Administrative Final EIR (includes 1st and 2nd rounds City review/comment and associated revisions)
Task 10: Management and Coordination (ongoing)

Vernola Ranch Specific Plan EIR Proposal
Exhibit IV: Ability to Meet Project Schedule

Page 13 ends

T&B Planning, Inc.

Months 11-12
Task 8: Prepare Final EIR
Task 9: Prepare Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Task 10: Management and Coordination (ongoing)

Months 13-14
Task 11: Attend Public Outreach Meetings/Public Hearings on the Project Task 10: Management and Coordination (ongoing)
Task 12: Project Close-Out

-10-
12774-0001\2684866v1.doc

EXHIBIT B

QUOTATION FOR SERVICE

Vernola Ranch Specific Plan EIR Proposal
Exhibit V: Budget

Page 14 ends

T&B Planning, Inc.

EXHIBIT V BUDGET

T&B Planning will provide the Scope of Services set forth in the City’s RFP dated May 27, 2022 for the provision of environmental consulting services necessary to complete the preparation of a Project Level EIR for the proposed Vernola Ranch Specific Plan project pursuant to the following not-to-exceed budget. Pursuant to the City’s RFP, the budget includes a 10% contingency.

Phase/Task Description
Budget
Amount

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 Project Initiation $6,150.00
Task 2 Notice of Preparation $1,490.00
Task 3 Technical Report Review $6,110.00
Task 4 Prepare Administrative Draft EIR $89,550.00
Task 5 Prepare Public Review Draft EIR $11,930.00
Task 6 Circulation of the EIR and Public Notification $5,950.00 Task 7 Prepare Administrative Draft Final EIR $19,410.00 Task 8 Prepare Final EIR $6,550.00
Task 9 MMRP $2,200.00
Task 10 Management and Coordination $13,630.00
Task 11 Attend Public Outreach Meeting/Hearings $10,660.00 Task 12 Project Close-Out $4,700.00
Sub-Total T&B Planning Labor: $178,330.00

CONTINGENCY FEE
10% Contingency Fee $17,833.00
Total Project Budget: $196,163.00
Reimbursable Expense Allowance (printing, deliveries, etc.): $7,500.00 Total Project Budget (Including Reimbursables): $203,663.00

Vernola Ranch Specific Plan EIR Proposal
Exhibit V: Budget

Page 15 ends

T&B Planning, Inc.

T&B Planning, Inc. Hourly Rates and Billing Policy
If at any time during the completion of this project, we are requested to perform services beyond the S cope of Work or if T&B Planning, Inc. is authorized to provide services on a Time and Materials basis, we will invoice for such work in accordance with the hourly rates provided below. The rates identified below shall be in effect for the duration of the contract.
• Principal ................................ ................................ ......... $205.00 - $245.00/Hour • Director ................................ ................................ .......... $185.00 - $205.00/Hour • Senior Associate ................................ ............................. $170.00 - $195.00/Hour • Senior Project Manager ................................ ................. $160.00 - $185.00/Hour • Project Manager ................................ ............................. $145.00 - $165.00/Hour • Graphics Manager/GIS Specialist ................................ .... $135.00 - $155.00/Hour • Senior Planner ................................ ................................ $135.00 - $155.00/Hour • Assistant Project Manager ................................ .............. $125.00 - $145.00/Hour • Analyst – Environmental ................................ ................... $75.00 - $115.00/Hour • Planner – Land Use & Entitlements ................................ ... $75.00 - $115.00/Hour • Associate – Development Services ................................ .... $75.00 - $115.00/Hour • Technician – Graphics & GIS................................ ................ $75.00 - $95.00/Hour • Assistant/Accounting Manager ................................ ........... $65.00 - $90.00/Hour

Reimbursable Expenses:

T&B Planning's hourly rates do not include out -of-pocket expenses (including, but not limited to, blueprinting, duplicating/copying, reproduction, GIS data acquisition fees, aerial photography, and delivery services). Provided below are the estimated costs of such expenses.
• CD-ROM or USB ................................ ................................ ................ $10.00/each • Black/White 8.5 x 11 Copy/Print ................................ ......................... $0.10/page • Black/White 11 x 17 Copy/Print ................................ .......................... $0.20/page • Color 8.5 x 11 Copy/Print. ................................ ................................ ...$1.00/page • Color 11 x 17 Copy/Print ................................ ................................ .... $1.50/page • Color Bond Plot ................................ ................................ .............. $10.00/sq. ft. • Binding Materials ................................ ................................ ........................ $3.00 • Book Folding ................................ ................................ ...................... $0.15/page • Aerial Photographs ................................ ................................ ........ $200.00/each • Mileage ................................ ................................ ...................... Current IRS Rate • Mailing ................................ ................................ ........... Current U.S. Postal Rate • Overnight Deliveries ................................ ............................. Current Carrier Rate • Same-Day Deliveries ................................ ...........Current Messenger Service Rate

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.N
PART

NERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF

RIVERSIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FOR

PART-TIME SERVICES OF AN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

COORDINATOR
RECO

MMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve funding and a partnership agreement with the County of Riverside Emergency Management Dept. (EMD) in the amount of $80,000 annually I $240,000 over three years.

BAC

KGROUND
The City of Jurupa Valley entered into an agreement upon its incorporation for the County of Riverside (RivCo ) to provide Fire Protection Services, which at the time included emergency management services. The County recently restructured and separated emergency services from Fire Services and now provides the opportunity for cities to enter into a separate agreement for these services. In the past, the CalFire emergency services position assisted cities by sharing the staff time of one coordinator per 3 - 4 cities weekly or as time permitted. While these services were helpful, the staff availability and scope of work provided were extremely limited.

The shifting of these positions to RivCo EMD, coupled with the desire to develop a more comprehensive and enhanced emergency services program, has necessitated the additional cost to participating cities. By entering into an agreement for ongoing enhanced service levels, cities have a choice for the type and amount of service suited to their individual needs and budget. The County initially provided four options for service levels but are now only offering Option C - part-time .5FTE (20 hrs. wk) or Option D - full- time 1.0FTE (40 hrs. wk) as shown in Exhibit B - Payment Provisions.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS
Through its Emergency Management Department (EMD), Riverside County (RivCo ) shall provide to the City of Jurupa Valley the services of an Emergency Services Coordinator (ESC) as described in Exhibit A and Attachment 1. Staff recommends that RivCo shall provide emergency services utilizing the designated service level of an ESC, Option C -.5FTE shared Coordinator.

Staff recommends entering into this agreement to assist with filling the identified gaps necessary to enhance and continue the build-out of the City's emergency management efforts, training, and new Emergency Operations Center (EOC).

As an example, this position would provide support for the following:
• EOC Readiness - Needs analysis, structure and systems analysis, alert and warning processes, analysis and build- out of future EOC location, EOC training, and section training, conduct assessment of situational awareness and common operating practices, continuity of government planning/training. • Response and Recovery Phase - Incident Response, Liaison - State and Federal Partners.
• Update Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). • Functional Needs Plan - update plan, review template, provide training and support.
• Liaison - State and Federal Partners.
• Grants - analysis of grant opportunities, support, guidance and submittal. • Community Outreach - will be able to attend events, make presentations • Training - WebEOC, alert and warning, EOC section/action planning, conduct exercises and drills, action plan local/regional level, functional needs assessment and training, mass care and shelter, concept and operations, and develop a CERT program for staff and public.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no additional impact to the General Fund as a result of this recommended action. As part of the Fiscal Year 2022 -2023 budget adoption process, the City Council appropriated $80,000 for this purpose. Staff has also applied for, and expects to receive funding in the amount of $25,147 in Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) funding from the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) to assist in offsetting the cost of this position.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.A
PUBL

IC HEARING REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
(ZONE EE ) TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED (THE “DISTRICT”) AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY; SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MISSION

BOULEVARD AND AGATE STREET INTERSECTION

RECOMMENDATION
1) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-69, entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ZONE EE) ; LOCATED

SOUTH OF GALENA STREET ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF TROY COURT, TO

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED, CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND

ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED

BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
BA

CKGROUND
The Lands
caping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), requires the City Council conduct proceedings to annex territory into an assessment district formed under the Act and to levy assessments within such territory.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

In connection with the City’s incorporation in 2011, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No. 12- 10 on July 22, 2010, to establish the Terms and Conditions of Incorporation, which require that the authority and responsibility for special assessment districts within the incorporated City associated with any County Landscape Maintenance District be transferred to the City upon its incorporation.

By its Resolution No. 2011- 26, adopted on July 1, 2011, the City Council assumed all authority and responsibility for the special assessment districts within the incorporated City associated with any County Landscape Maintenance Distri ct and specifically assumed responsibility for any and all special assessments levied in connection with such districts.

The County’s Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89- 1-Consolidated (the “County District”), established pursuant to the provisions of the Act includes various territories located both within the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “City Territory”) and outside the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “County Territory”). Pursuant to its Resolution No. 2016-01 adopted on February 4, 2016, the City declared that the City Territory is a district under the 1972 Act, which is separate and distinct from the County Territory, and designated such territory as the “Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated.”
At its May 19, 2022 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- 43 initiating proceedings for the annexation of territory to the Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (the “District”) as Zone EE and the levy and collection of assessments within such territory. Zone EE currently includes three assessable parcels 167-110-035, 167-110-036 and 167-110-037.

Further, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-43 declaring its intention to annex territory to the District and to levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024. Resolution No. 2022-43 set July 7, 2022 as the public hearing date for protests to the levy of annual assessments and the annexation.

Subsequent to the May 19, 2022 meeting and in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218, notice was mailed to the owners of the properties within the territory to be annexed, along with an assessment ballot for such owners to indicate support for, or opposition to, the proposed annexation. The notice indicated the amount of the proposed assessment for their respective parcels and the date, time and place of the public hearing.

ANALYSIS

It is proposed to include the additional parcels within the boundaries of the District and to levy assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024. Such territory is shown on a map on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection.

Page | 3

At the public hearing, the C ity Council must hear and consider all oral and written statements, protests, objections or other communications made or filed with respect to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments within such territory.

The assessment ballots must be tabulated at the public hearing. A majority protest exists if ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment and annexation exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment and annexation. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. In the absence of a majority protest, the City Council may adopt a resolution ordering the annexation and levy and collection of assessments within the territory.

OTHER INFORMATION

• City Council initiated proceedings for the annexation on May 19, 2022.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The property owners are responsible for the annual payments of the special assessment.

The City will file the special assessment with the County Auditor-Controller for collection via the annual property tax bills . The property owners have posted a deposit with their application to form Zone EE, in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the annexation. Approval of this resolution does not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability for Zone EE. The City’s cost to administer Zone EE annually will be reimbursed through the special assessment charged to property owners.

The fiscal year 2023-2024 (base year) maximum assessment for landscape maintenance and street lighting for each parcel is $1,700.00 and is subject to escalation beginning in FY 2023-2024 to account for reasonable increase cost for maintenance and inflation.

The revenue from this special assessment will be deposited into City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C and will be used to pay for the services provided in Zone EE. Both the revenue and expenses will be part of the City’s FY 2023-2024 Adopted Budget, and there is no anticipated impact to the general fund.

CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -69, ordering annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide staff with further direction.

-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-69

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY (ZONE EE); GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF GALENA

STREET ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF TROY COURT, TO CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED, CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND

ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY

AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERR ITORY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 -2024 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND

HIGHWAYS CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA

CONSTITUTION

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HEREBY
FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley initiated proceedings for the annexation of territory to City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (hereinafter referred to as the "District") and the levy and collection of assessments within such territory for the 2023-2024 fiscal year and caused to be prepared a written report (the "Engineer's Report") in accordance with the Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 2. Following notice duly given in accordance with law, the City Council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the Engineer's Report, the annexation of territory to the District, and the levy and collection of the proposed assessment within such territory for fiscal year 2023-2024. All interested persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. The City Council considered all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons and tabulated all ballots. The City Council hereby finds that a majority protest does not exist as defined in Section 4(e) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution. All protests and objections to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of the proposed assessment against lots or parcels of property within the annexed territory for fiscal year 2023-2024 are hereby overruled by the City Council.

Section 3. The City Council hereby orders the annexation of territory, which is described as Assessor 's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 167-110-035, 167-110-036 and 167- 110-037 generally located on the southeast corner of Mission Boulevard and Agate Street.

The District will continue to be designated as City of Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated.
-2-

Section 4. Based upon its review of the Engineer's Report and other reports and information, the City Council hereby finds and determines that (i) the land within the annexed territory will be benefited by the improvements as described in such Engineer 's Report, (ii) the annexed territory includes all of the lands so benefited , (iii) the net amount to be assessed upon the lands within the annexed territory for the 2023-2024 fiscal year, in accordance with the Engineer's Report, is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcel s in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements; and (iv) only special benefits are assessed and no assessment is imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.

Section 5. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made, which improvements are briefly described as follows: The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation within the public right-of-way parkway landscaped area identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for this Zone; the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris; the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities; the design, furnishing, construction, and installation of landscaping and irrigation improvements to meet the City’s current standards for L&LMD; and the maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing.

Section 6. Lots or parcels of land within the annexed territory that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local governmental entity, the State of California, or the United States shall be assessed unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such lots or parcels receive no special benefit from the proposed improvements.

Section 7. The City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment, with respect to the annexed parcels, as originally proposed in the Engineer's Report.

Section 8. The assessment is in compliance with the provisions of the Act and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

Section 9. The assessment is levied without regard to property valuation.

Section 10. The assessment is levied for the purpose of paying the costs and expenses of the improvements described in Section 5 above for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2023 and ending on June 30, 2024.

-3-
Section 11. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024.

Section 12. The improvements shall be performed pursuant to law.

Section 13. The County Auditor of Riverside County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount of the assessment and such assessments shall then be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments shall be paid to the City Administrative Services Director.

Section 14. The Administrative Director shall deposit all moneys representing assessments collected by the County to the credit of a special fund known as "City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-I -C Zone EE," and such moneys shall be expended only for the improvements described in Section 5 above.

Section 15. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the diagram and assessment, or a certified copy of the diagram and assessment, with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption.

Section 16. A certified copy of the diagram and assessment shall be filed in the office of the City Engineer, with a duplicate copy on file in the office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of July 2022.

__________________________
_
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of J urupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-69 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of July, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of July, 2022.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
0 | P a g e

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 MAY 2022

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE EE

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL
Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

1 | P a g e

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT ....................................................................................................... 6 LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE ..................................................................................................... 6 PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE ............ 7 LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 7 PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 8 MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 8 COST ESTIMATE ......................................................................................................................................... 9 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM.............................................................................................................. 12 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 13

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) AS ZONE EE
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

Pursuant to the direction from the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (“City Council”), California, this Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is prepared and hereby submitted for the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) in compliance with the provisions of Section 22565 through 22574 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), said Act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution.

This Report provides for the annexation of a portion of TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL to City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89-1-C as ZONE EE and establishes the Maximum Assessment to be levied in the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023 (2022-2023) and continuing in all subsequent Fiscal Years, for this area to be known and designated as:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL
I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefor and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the 1972 Act, do hereby submit the following:

Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zone, as well as the boundaries of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and Assessment Roll, correspond with the n umbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessor Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
3 | P a g e

As of the date of this Report, there are no parcels or lots within ZONE EE that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

May 19, 2022.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the Zone have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the Zone benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For pa rticulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map, a reduced copy of which is included herein. On this 19th day of Ma y, 2022 the City Council, City of Jurupa Valley, State of California, ordering the preparation of the Report pro viding for th e annexation of a portion of TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL to L&LMD No. 89 -1-C as ZONE EE did, pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Act, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2022-XX for a special assessment district zone known and designated as:

ZONE EE

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL
The annexation of ZONE EE includes the parcels of land within the development known as TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL. As of the date of this report, the zone contains five assessable parcels; also identified by the Assessor Parcel Number(s) 167-110-035, 167 -110-036, and 167 -110-037. As required by law, an Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map is filed herewith, showing the Zon e, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Zone as they exist, as of the date of this Report, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been assigned a parcel/lot number within a specific tract and indicated on the Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

The following report presents the engineering analysis for the annexation of ZONE EE and the establishment of the Maximum Assessment to be levied and collected commencing Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and all subsequent fiscal years.

DEFINITIONS
Agency – Means the local government, City of Jurupa Valley.

Capital cost – Means the cost of acquisition, installation, construction, reconstruction, or replacement of a permanent public improvement by the Agency.

District – Means an area determined by the Agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement of property-related service.

Maintenance and operation expenses - Means the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement.
5 | P a g e

Ad Valorem Reduction – The corresponding general benefit value of the improvements.

Special benefit – Means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”

6 | P a g e

PART I – BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT

LOCATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ZONE

ZONE EE shall consist of a benefit zone encompassing the properties within the development known as TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL . The proposed improvements described in this Report are based on current development and improvement plans provided as of the date of this Report.

ZONE EE is generally located south of Galena Street along the west side of Troy Court, in the City of Jurupa Valley, in the County of Riverside, State of California. At the time of this assessment, the assessment zone consists of 3 assessable (legal) parcels and zero non-assessable parcels. ZONE EE consists of all lots/units, parcels, and subdivisions of land located in the following development area:

TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL– Assessor Parcel Numbers as of date of this Report: 167-110-035, 167-110- 036, and 167-110-037.
7 | P a g e

PART II – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE

The services to be funded by City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD No. 89 -1-C ZONE EE include the landscape maintenance within development designated as TROY COURT INDUSTRIAL. The proposed improvements, the associated costs, and assessments have been carefully reviewed, identified, and allocated based on:
a. Level of Service
b. Improvement Types
c. Proximity to Improvement
d. Levels of Special Benefit from Zone (on Public versus Private) The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant fac ilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lot(s) or parcel(s) of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than by assessed value.

It was determined that the improvements identified by this report will directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within ZONE EE. The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape and lighting improvements within the existing district as well as provide for annual maintenance of those improvements and the assessment revenues generated by the Zone will be used solely for such purpose.

LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS
The assessment will provide for l andscaping servicing and maintenance on public right -of-way and as approved by the City during the project approval. The following apply:

1. Servicing: the furnishing of water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any other improvements.

2. Maintenance: the furnishing of se rvices and materials for the ord inary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including the repair, removal, or replacement o f all of part of landscape improvements. Maintenance shall also include tree trimming for the trees identified on the approved L&LMD Landscape Plans for ZONE EE.

The benefits associated with landscaping improvements include:

1. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire protection.

2. Reduced criminal activity and property -related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties through well-maintained surrounding and amenities.

3. Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation and attenuation noise.
8 | P a g e

PART III – FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION
The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the ZONE EE to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

The landscaping and streetlight improvements within ZONE EE provide direct and special benefit to the lots or parcels within the Zone. Therefore, the maintenance of these improvements also provides direct and special benefit by maintaining the functionality of the improvements and allowing the improvements to operate in a proper manner.

Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all (any) parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the maintenance and servicing of landscaping and streetlight are apportioned on a per parcel basis.

The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the Zone and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. A portion of the total maintenance costs for the landscaping and streetlights, if any, associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the Zone, but will be paid from other City of Jurupa Valley funds.

No property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property. Additionally, because the benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use , it is determined that each of the parcels within the Zone benefit equally form the improvements. Therefore, the proportionate share of the costs and expenses for the provisions of landscaping, as well as costs and expenses for the maintenance of the landscaping, are apportioned equally on a per parcel basis.

MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The following methodology was adopted by City Council in Resolution No. 2016 -01 dated February 4, 2016. Such methodology has been maintained in preparation of this Report. The purpose of establishing a Maximum Assessment formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustments to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which would add to the ZONE Y costs and assessments.

The Maximum Assessment formula shall be applied to all assessable parcels of land within the Zone. For ZONE EE, the initial Maximum Assessment(s) for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 are as follows:

1. The initial Total Maximum Assessment established within ZONE EE shall be $5,100.

2. The initial Maximum Assessment per assessable parcel, established within ZONE EE is anticipated to be $1,700.

The initial Maximum Assessment is subject to an annual inflator starting in Fiscal Year 2023-2024. The initial Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative 9 | P a g e

percentage increase in the CPI -U Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.

The Maximum Assessment is adjusted annually and is calculated independent of ZONE EE’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. The proposed annual assessment (rate per assessable parcel) applied in any fiscal year is not considered to be an increased assessment if less than or equal to the Maximum Assessment amount. In no case shall the annual assessment exceed the Maximum Assessment.

Although the Maximum Assessment will increase each year, the actual ZONE EE assessments may remain virtually unchanged. The Maximum Assessment adjustment is designed to establish reasonable limits on ZONE EE assessments. The Maximum Assessment calculated each year does not require or facilitate an increase of the annual assessment and neither does it restrict assessments to the adjusted maximum amount. If the budget and assessments for the fiscal year require an increase and the incre ase is more than the adjusted Maximum Assessment, it is considered an increased assessment.

To impose an increase assessment, the City of Jurupa Valley must comply with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D Section 4c, that requires a public hearing and certain protest procedures including mailed notice of the public hearing and property owner protest balloting. Property owner through the balloting process must approve the proposed assessment increase. If the proposed assessment is ap proved, then a new Maximum Assessment is established for ZONE EE. If the proposed assessment is not approve d, the City may not levy an assessment greater than the adjusted Maximum Assessment previously established for ZONE EE.

COST ESTIMATE
The Ad Valorem reduction is the corresponding general benefit value of the improvements, and it is determined by identifying the general public benefit from the installation and upkeep of the improvements identified on this report. All proposed landscape, water quality improvements, and lighting improvements contained within this report are located directly in front of the assessed zone and the construction and installation of the improvements were only necessary for the development of properties within the Zone. Therefore, it was determined that any public access or use of these local improvements by others is incidental and there is no measurable general benefit to properties outside the one or to the public at large. The Ad Valorem reduction for this assessment is zero.

10 | P a g e

The Assessment for each assessable parcel within ZONE EE is calculated by dividing the total Annual Balance to Levy minus the Ad Valorem Reduction by the total number of assessable subdivided parcels within ZONE EE to determine the Annual Assessment per assessable parcel.

𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝐿𝑒𝑣𝑦 − 𝐴𝑑 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑅𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑠 = 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑙 The Annual Balance to Levy is the Total Annual Landscaping Costs plus the Total Annual Streetlight Costs as seen in the following summary table:

11 | P a g e

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO. 89-1-C ZONE EE

WHEELERS UPFITTER
FY 2022-2023

Total Assessable Parcels: 3
Cost Description Total Cost for
Zone EE
Cost per Parcel
for Zone EE
Landscaping:

Annual Landscaping Maintenance: $935 $312
Tree Trimming : $1,000 $334
Water (including water meter) $1,170 $390
Fertilizer Injector $220 $73.33
Electricity (including electric meter) $300 $100
Mulch : $137 $45.67
Calsense Single: $250 $83.33
Backflow Certificate : $50 $16.67
Graffiti Abatement: $5 $1.67
TOTAL ANNUAL LANDSCAPING COSTS : $4,067 $1,356

Streetlighting:

Streetlights LED N/A N/A
TOTAL ANNUAL STREETLIGHTING COSTS : N/A N/A

ADMINISTRATION (8.5%) $346 $116
INSPECTION (5%) $204 $68
OPERATING RESERVE (10%) $407 $136

TOTAL ANNUAL ASSESSMENT: *$5,100 *$1,700
*Rounded to nearest hundred dollar
INITIAL MAXIMUM ASSESSMENT PER ASSESSABLE PARCEL : $1,700

12 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
(See next page)

13 | P a g e

14 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

Parcel identification for each parcel within ZONE EE shall be the parcels as shown on the Riverside County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps.

ZONE EE includes the following Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) as of the date of this Report: 167-110- 035, 167-110-036, and 167-110-037.

The initial Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted annually by the greater of two percent (2%) or the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U for All Items Index published by the BLS.

There are five legal lots within the boundary with seven identified Assessor’s parcels. The initial Maximum Assessments per assessable parcel for ZONE EE are as follows:

APN
(as of date of this report)
Maximum Assessment
167-110-035 $1,700
167-110-036 $1,700
167-110-037 $1,700

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/ CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.B
PUBL

IC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL

LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN FOR JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1
CONSOLIDATED (JV L&LMD NO. 89-1-C) - CITYWIDE AND APPROVAL OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
RECO

MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council open the public hearing and take testimony, if any. 2) Fol
lowing the public hearing, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-70, entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FO R ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, AND Z; AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2- E, AND 2 -F OF THE JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL LOTS AND

PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONES AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

BACKGROUND

The proposed assessments for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 34, 39, 41, 61, 62, 69, 73, 78, 86, 91, 93, 94, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F are described in the Engineer’s Report (Volumes 1 and 2).

Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Resolution No. 2021- 42, a public hearing was held on July 7, 2022, to receive testimony regarding the assessment levy for fiscal year 202 2-2023 for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2 -B, 2 -C, 2-D, 2 -E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89- 1-C. Notice of the public hearing was given by publication.

ANALYSIS

Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-70 confirms the assessment levy, as indicated in the Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C, and orders the placement of the annual assessment on the County’s Assessment Roll. Each year, the costs are updated and distributed in proportion to benefits received. The updated rates reflect an adjustment of 2.0% or 10.0% based on the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI- U) for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario and consistent with ballot propositions approved by the qualified electors when establishing each zone. The actual assessment of each zone is based on the budget for each individual zone prepared as part of the Engineer ’s Report.

OTHER INFORMATION

On May 19, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -41 ordering the preparation of the Engineer’s Report and Resolution No. 2022-42 declaring the intent to levy and collect assessments.

Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone G, and Street Lighting Zone 69 are not yet maintained. The improvements on Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone G, and Street Lighting Zone 69 have not been installed or have not been accepted for maintenance yet. Zone C is currently maintained by the property owner (s) within the respective zone boundary . Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riv erside Auditor Controller’s Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Page | 3

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The annual budget for F iscal Year 2022-23 totals $1,243,198. Including the respective zones assessment increase from the previous year, based on the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) applicable to each Zone. Adoption of this resolution will allow the City of Jurupa Valley to collect funds to maintain the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District. Budget detail sheets are provided.

All costs for administration of the District are currently paid by the assessments to the benefitted parcels within the District. I n order to meet the C ounty of Riverside Auditor - Controller's Office’s August 2022 deadline requirement for fixed charge submittals , District revenue for FY 2022 -2023 for the maintenance of landscaping, trai ls, fencing, fossil filters, street lights and traffic signals within certain areas of the City of Jurupa Valley has been identified.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Take no action. This would mean that the City of Jurupa Valley could not continue to collect assessments to pay for maintenance of improvements in these specific rights-of-way and would need to discontinue (a) the maintenance of landscaping, trails, fencin g, and irrigation services to these areas, (b) maintaining the stormwater facilities and BMPs including water quality basins and any other NPDES/WQMP/BMP related devices, and (c) paying for street light energy costs in certain CFDs.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-70

A RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGR AM AND
ASSESSMENT FOR ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, AND Z; AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, AND 2-F OF THE JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED OF THE C ITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND

LEVYING ASSESSMENTS ON ALL LOTS AND PARC ELS OF LAND

THEREIN WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONES AND STREET
LIGHTING ZONES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
WHEREAS, on July 7, 2022, the City Council (hereinafter the "City Council") of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the "City"), adopted Resolution No. 2022-70, pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code (herein after the “Streets and Highways Code”), which among other things, scheduled a public hearing on the annual levy and collection of assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within 40 Assessment Zones (hereinafter “Zone 4", “Zone 5", “Zone 6", “Zone 7", “Zone 9", “Zone 14", “Zone 16", “Zone 17", “Zone 21", “Zone 34", “Zone 61", “Zone 73", “Zone 78", “Zone 95", “Zone 102", “Zone 106", “Zone 126", “Zone 128", “Zone 132", “Zone 137", “Zone 141", “Zone 142", “Zone 173", “Zone 182” , “Zone A” , “Zone C” , “Zone E” , “Zone F” , “Zone G” , “Zone I”, “Zone K”, ”Zone L”, “Zone M”, Zone N”, “Zone O”, “Zone P”, “Zone S”, “Zone T”, “Zone U”, “Zone X” and “Zone Z”, and collectively “Zones”; and 20 Street Lighting Zones (hereinafter “Street Lighting Zone 5", “Street Lighting Zone 7", “Street Lighting Zone 15", “Street Lighting Zone 17", “Street Lighting Zone 19", “Street Lighting Zone 39", “Street Lighting Zone 41", “Street Lighting Zone 62", “Street Lighting Zone 69", “Street Lighting Zone 86", “Street Lighting Zone 91", “Street Lighting Zone 93", “Street Lighting Zone 94", “Street Lighting Zone 102", “Street Lighting Zone 2-A", “Street Lighting Zone 2-B", “Street Lighting Zone 2-C", “Street Lighting Zone 2-D", “Street Lighting Zone 2-E", and “Street Lighting Zone 2-F",, and, collectively “Street Lighting Zones ”) for FY 2022-23 to pay the costs of the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of multi-purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio - swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights-of-way; and graffiti abatement; and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly published as required by Resolution No. 2022-42 and Section 22626(a) of the Streets and Highways code; and WHEREAS, at the time and place of said public hearing, as set forth in Resolution No. 2022-42, the City Council held the public hearing and afforded all interested persons an opportunity to testify and be heard, and considered all oral statements and all written protests or communications made or filed by any interested persons and at the conclusion of said hearing determined that a majority protest had not been received; and

-2-
WHEREAS, the City Council may proceed, pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code, to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed, or as changed by it, and the adoption of such a resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment on all assessable lots and parcels of land within of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C for FY 2022-2023.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals/Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that
(a) The above recitals are true and correct.
(b) Compliance has been had with all of the requirements of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code;
(c) The City Council may proceed to adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment for JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C either as originally proposed or as changed by it; and the Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C either as originally proposed or as changed by it; and the assessments to be levied on the assessable lots and parcels of land in Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2 -F of JV L&LMD No. 89 -1-C for the installation and planting of landscaping ; the installation of multi-purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, foss il filters, bio -swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights -of-way; and graffiti abatement in said district during FY 2022-23 as contained in the report of the Engineer which is on file with the City Clerk (hereinafter the “Report”) are based on benefits derived by such lots and parcels.

Section 2. Authorized Improvements for Zones. The improvements authorized for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 141, 142, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, P, T, U, X, and Z of JV L&LMD No. 89 1 C are:

(a) The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; and,
(b) The installation of irrigation and electrical facilities; and (c) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone 4 is authorized to provide the following:

-3-
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails; (b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of multi-purpose trail lighting; (c) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of off-leash dog park facilities.

In addition, Zones 5 and 21 are authorized to provide the following:

(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails; (b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fencing.

In addition, Zones 14 and 16 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of decorative and monument lighting;

In addition, Zone 141 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of bio-swales within the public right-of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff. (b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone 142 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses. (b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zones A is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public righ t-of ways including incidental costs and expenses
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zones C is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.

In addition, Zones E, F, G, K, L, M, N, P, T, and O are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zones I is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans. (c) The maintenance of the landscape on the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue, at the frontage of the commercial parcel.

-4-

In addition, Zone S is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone U is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone X is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping on Cantu -Galleano Ranch Road, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.

In addition, Zone Z is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetl ights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 3. Authorized Improvements for Zones. The improvements authorized for Zones 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 126, 128, and 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zones 78 and 137 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

In addition, Zone 137 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The mainte nance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 4. Authorized Improvements for Zones. The improvements authorized for Zones 106, 132, 173 and 182 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:

-5-
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 5. Authorized Improvements for Zones. The improvements authorized for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F are:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-way including incidental costs and expenses.

Section 6. Confirmation of Report. The Report and the assessment diagram and the assessment of the estimated costs of the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of multi-purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fos sil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi- purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio -swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights -of-way; and graffiti abatement, in Zones within 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C for FY 2022-23 contained in the Report are confirmed.

Section 7. Levy o f Assessment . Pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code, the adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of the assessment for the installation, and maintenance and servicing improvements in Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z, and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for FY 2022-23 contained in the Report, and such assessment is levied. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution, together with the diagram and assessment contained in the Report with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, who, pursuant to Section 22645 of Streets and Highways Code, shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in said assessment.

Section 8. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Section 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.

Section 10. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7TH day of July, 2022.

-6-
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-7-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-70 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of July 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of July 2022.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 APRIL 2022

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FY 2022-2023
FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
VOLUME 1
ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, AND Z.

Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

SUBJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) - CITYWIDE

TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

ENGINEER’S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) was prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum assessments that can be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel of land within each Zone of the District.

The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:

Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and arti cle of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.

I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and bene fited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:

3 | P a g e

1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of lan d, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.

4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Zones 5, 6,7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, and O that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental age ncy that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

5. As of the date of this report, there is one parcel within Zone 4 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Valley. Parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Number 163 -042-043 is the location of Jurupa Valley City Hall. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots are not subject to special assessments.

6. As of the date of this report, there is three parcels within Zone 16 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Vall ey. Parcel identified by Assessor Pa rcel Number s 181052017, 181052018, and 181052004 correspond to the location of Jurupa Valley Operation Center. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots are not subject to special assessments.

May 19, 2022.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

Table of Contents
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 6 ASSESSMENT UNITS .................................................................................................................................. 6 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ................................................................................... 7 Description of Improvements per Zone ................................................................................................ 8 Maintenance Plans .............................................................................................................................. 13 PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ................................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 14 SPECIAL BENEFIT ..................................................................................................................................... 14 GENERAL BENEFIT ................................................................................................................................... 16 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .......................................................................................... 18 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 18 BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE ..................................................................................................................... 19 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 20 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 21

5 | P a g e

BACKGROUND

The Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all a nnual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.

The 1972 Act provides for the annual levy of assessments for the Jurupa Valley L andscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-C, for the express purpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing landscaping, trails, fossil filters, bio -swales, streetlights, traffic signals, basins, and graffiti abatement improvements. The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments for an assessment d istrict after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provisions in Proposition 218.

The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.

Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the District. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.

In accordance with Proposition 218, property owners of the assessed parcels must approve any new or increased assessments. Zones included in this Report have been previously approved by property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

6 | P a g e

PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.

There are 70 locations within the District: 41 separate assessment zones with 50 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 20 street lighting assessment zones with 20 locations.

There are 52 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (17) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consist of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F, G, P, and Z, and Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on eight (8) locations within the District on Fiscal Year 202 2-2023; these locations are in Assessment District Zone K, L, O, S, T , U, X, and Street Lighting Zone 2-E.

The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 61 existing Zones (70 locations). New or pending Zones will be presented to the City Council under separate reports.

Total number of Zones/Locations: 61 (70 locations)
Assessment Zones: 41 (50 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 20 (20 locations)

Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 34 – within 25 Assessment Zones Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Locations (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 1 8 – within 18 Assessment Zones.

The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:

Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z.

Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F.

ASSESSMENT UNITS
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, Z; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.

Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, and X; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F

7 | P a g e

EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.

Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Locations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zone 137, Zone 173, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone I, Zone M, Zone N, and Zone X; and Street Lighting Zone 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 15, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, Street Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, Street Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2-A, Street Lighting Zone 2-B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, and Street Lighting Zone 2-F.

Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements not yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone G, Zone K, Zone L, Zone O, Zone P, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone X, Zone Z, Street Lighting Zone 69 , and Street Lighting Zone 2-E.

Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone P, and Street Lighting Zone 69.

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:

The installation, maintenance and servicing of ornamental structures, fences, multi -purpose trails, including trees, shrubs, grass, and other ornamental vegetation, and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, street lighting, traffic signals, bridge lights, and drainage devices (bio swales and fossil filters), located in public rights-of-way within the boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicin g of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the lighting and operation of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.

Article XIII (D) of the California Constitution defines “maintenance and operation expenses” as “the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement”. The District’s funding includes, but is not limited to, the removal, repair, replac ement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the maintenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.

8 | P a g e

Description of Improvements per Zone

Zone 4:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 4 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fence, dog park, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Zone 5:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Zone 6:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 6 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue
Zone 7:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 5 generally includes landscaping and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Etiwanda Avenue Van Buren Boulevard

9 | P a g e

Zone 9:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 9 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Country Village Road Philadelphia Avenue
Zone 14:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 14 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fence, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Armstrong Road Sierra Avenue
Zone 16:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 16 generally includes landscaping, streetlight, and monument improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Crestmore Road Mission Boulevard
Zone 17:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 17 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Etiwanda Avenue Iberia Street
Zone 21:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 21 generally includes landscaping within public right-of-ways of:

Castlerock Road Galena Street Rutile Street
Zone 34:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 34 generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Lakeside Drive
Zone 61:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 61 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Cydney Circle Halbrook Ter
Zone 73:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 73 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Viaggio Circle
Zone 78:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 78 generally includes fossil filter and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
65th Street Limonite Avenue Pats Ranch Road
Zone 95:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 95 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:
54th Street

10 | P a g e

Zone 102:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 102 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Armstrong Road
Zone 106:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 106 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Country Village Road
Zone 126:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 126 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Harrell Street
Zone 128:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 128 generally includes fossil filter improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Granite Hill Drive
Zone 132:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 132 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20TH Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 137:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 137 generally includes fossil filter, streetlight, and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bain Street Bellegrave Avenue Birtcher Drive
Zone 141:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 141 generally includes landscaping, bio-swale, and streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

A Street Rubidoux Boulevard
Zone 142:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 142 generally includes landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fencing, fossil filter, traffic signal, and future bio-swale and graffiti abatement improvements within public right-of-ways of:
63rd Street Limonite Ave. Lucretia Ave. Wineville Rd.

Zone 173:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 173 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Caden Way/Project Driveway Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
I-15 on/off ramp Wineville Road

11 | P a g e

Zone 182:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone 182 generally includes streetlight and traffic signal improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Wineville Road Mission Boulevard
Zone A:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone A generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Limonite Avenue Median
Zone C:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone C generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Limonite Avenue Felspar Street

Zone E:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone E generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Hall Avenue El Rivino Road
Zone F:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone F generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Pedley Road Golondrina Street
Zone G:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone G generally includes landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Avalon Street 36th Street
Zone I:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone I generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue Etiwanda Avenue
Zone K:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone K generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Jurupa Road Pyrite Street
Zone L:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone L generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard 42nd Street
Zone M:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone M generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Riverside Drive Etiwanda Avenue

12 | P a g e

Zone N:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone N generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard 26th Street
Zone O:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone O generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Avlis Lane Viaggio Circle
Zone P:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone P generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Ben Nevis Road Pedley Street

Zone S:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone S generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Pats Ranch Road 68th Street

Zone T:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone T generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard

Zone U:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone U generally includes streetlight and landscaping improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard Avalon Street

Zone X
Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone X generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Etiwanda Avenue Parkhurst Street

Zone Z:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Zone Z generally includes streetlight and landscaping (median and parkway) improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard El Rivino Road Hall Street

13 | P a g e

Maintenance Plans
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are voluminous and are not bound in this Report b ut by this reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection.

Copies are available in the office of the Riverside County Transportation Department, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. See the list below for plan numbers. Reduced maps of the maintained improvements are filled in Part IV of this Report; see Assessment Diagrams.

The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:

ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone A GP14-020/IP14-007
Zone C GP16-025/IP16-012
Zone E GP16-043/IP16-019
Zone F GP16-040/IP16-016
Zone G GP17-025/IP17-006
Zone I LD17-569/IP17-010
Zone K LD18-229/IP13-006
Zone L LD17-351/IP17-003
Zone M LD18-642/IP18-008
Zone N LD19-162/IP18-011
Zone O GP17-034/IP16-001
Zone P Zone P/IP19-005

14 | P a g e

Zone S Zone S/IP19-006
Zone T Zone T/IP20-009
Zone U Zone U/IP21-001
Zone X Zone X/IP19-008
Zone Z Zone Z/IP21-002
PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

INTRODUCTION
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction , maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value.
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating as sessments reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Constitution (“Article” ) requires that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.

SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio -swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).

Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City required the original developer to install and /or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels.

15 | P a g e

Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.

In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the District by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properties in close proximity to the landscaping . Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety ( e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborhood property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the District. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians an d motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign right-of- ways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.

Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District . Streetlights are installed on and are for street purp oses and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed.

Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility . These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility.

The system of streets within the District is established to provide access to each parcel in the District.

Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the install ation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District.

The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental structures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets.

Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the District. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the

16 | P a g e

property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well -being for properties with in the District.

Traffic signal assessments are based on traffic studies and/or trip counts. For specific zone benefits, see Part III Estimate of Costs and Expenses.

Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that al l lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of electricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maintenance of landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are apportioned on a per acre, per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), or per parcel basis.

Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi -purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio- swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government-owned easements, uti lity easements, or flood channel parcels . Government -owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.

Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation;
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities;
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including, but not limited to, traffic signals;
• The installation or construction of any faci lities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, wa lls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and;
• The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.

GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcels within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement maintenance costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from other City Funds. Because the landscaping,

17 | P a g e

multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement improvements are located immediately adjacent to properties within the District and are maintained solely for the benefit of the properties within the District, any benefit received by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit . As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.

However, some traffic signal impr ovements provide general and specific benefit. It was previously determined that the costs and expenses for the traffic signal improvements are less than the County’s total maintenance cost. Percentages of the County’s total maintenance costs were previously determined from budgets at the time of annexation by Riverside County Transportation Department. These percentages are noted on the applicable Fiscal Year 2022–2023 budgets for those Zones with traffic signal improvements in Part III, Estimate of Costs and Expenses. Therefore, only the costs directly related to the specific benefit of the traffic signal improvements will be assessed to the applicable Zones.

18 | P a g e

PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES

INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.

The 1972 Act provides that the estimated costs of the improvements shall include the total cost of the improvements for the entire fiscal year (2022–2023), including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.

The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.

The inflation factor, for those zones with an inflation factor in place, may increase budgets for Zones, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed . However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.

Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 173, may be subject to an annual adjustment of two percent and the maximum assessment for Zones 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for All Items or the CPI-U for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside-San Bernardino -Ontario County California Stand ard Metropolitan Statistical area or, as implemented on December 2017, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor. The annual CPI-U for All Items or CPI-U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI -U for All Items, or CPI -U for Electricity ann ual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property owners within each of the benefit zones in the District.

19 | P a g e

BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained during fiscal year 202 2-2023 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditures, CPI -U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:

1. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 310-Exp. Detail Rpt.

2. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 320-Exp. Detail Rpt.

3. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; CFD-Exp. Detail Rpt.

4. City of Jurupa Valley Expenditures By GL dated 03/21/2022; CFD-LLMD 21 -22 YEAR END ESTIMATES by GL-Final

5. FY 2021-22 LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone dated 03/21/2022; CFD- LLMD 21-22 YEAR END ESTIMATES

The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were prepared for this report:
(See next page)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 137,573.61$ 6483.36 21.22$ Water 150,328.30$ 6483.36 23.19$ Backflow Certification 469.28$ 6483.36 0.07$ Tree Trimming 30,199.09$ 6483.36 4.66$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 13,257.21$ 6483.36 2.04$ Electricity 18,669.40$ 6483.36 2.88$ Field Inspection/Management 39,387.40$ 6483.36 6.08$ Repair and Replacement 22,994.93$ 6483.36 3.55$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 412,879.23$ COST PER EDU 63.68$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 35,094.73$ 6483.36 5.41$ Contingency 41,287.92$ 6483.36 6.37$ Cell Tower Lease Payment (40,986.63)$ 6483.36 (6.32)$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 35,396.03$ COST PER EDU 5.46$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 448,275.26$ COST PER EDU 69.14$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 229,699.43$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 35.43$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 229,699.43$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 35.43$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 218,575.83$
FY 20-21 CARRYFORWARD* (138,954.80)$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 4 (68-1536)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 11,943.79$ 1409 8.48$ Water 4,090.78$ 1409 2.90$ Backflow Certification 23.95$ 1409 0.02$ Tree Trimming 21,233.39$ 1409 15.07$ Field Inspection/Management 4,337.20$ 1409 3.08$ Repair and Replacement 2,371.03$ 1409 1.68$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 44,000.13$ COST PER PARCEL 31.23$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 3,740.01$ 1409 2.65$ Contingency 4,400.01$ 1409 3.12$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 8,140.02$ COST PER PARCEL 5.78$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 52,140.16$ COST PER PARCEL 37.01$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 77,782.50$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 55.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 76,257.35$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 54.12$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 31,148.36$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 5 (68-1537)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 4,473.34$ 30 149.11$ Water 916.77$ 30 30.56$ Backflow Certification 224.90$ 30 7.50$ Electricity 592.24$ 30 19.74$ Field Inspection/Management 654.18$ 30 21.81$ Repair and Replacement 1,471.60$ 30 49.05$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 8,333.03$ COST PER PARCEL 277.77$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 708.31$ 30 23.61$ Contingency 833.30$ 30 27.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,541.61$ COST PER PARCEL 51.39$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 9,874.64$ COST PER PARCEL 329.15$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,581.06$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 252.70$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,581.06$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 252.70$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 2,293.58$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 292.26$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 6 (68-1538)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 4,339.93$ 2095.48 2.07$ Water 2,921.97$ 2095.48 1.39$ Backflow Certification 57.30$ 2095.48 0.03$ Tree Trimming 1,870.00$ 2095.48 0.89$ Monument Lighting 160.80$ 2095.48 0.08$ Electricity 985.99$ 2095.48 0.47$ Field Inspection/Management 917.84$ 2095.48 0.44$ Repair and Replacement 636.63$ 2095.48 0.30$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 11,890.45$ COST PER ACRE 5.67$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 1,010.69$ 2095.48 0.48$ Contingency 1,189.05$ 2095.48 0.57$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 2,199.73$ COST PER ACRE 1.05$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 14,090.18$ COST PER ACRE 6.72$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,567.99$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5.52$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,567.99$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5.52$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 2,522.19$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 3,976.06$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 7 (68-1539)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 16,220.78$ 493 32.90$ Water 2,764.62$ 493 5.61$ Tree Trimming 1,122.00$ 493 2.28$ Electricity 1,859.22$ 493 3.77$ Repair and Replacement 834.90$ 493 1.69$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 21,679.52$ COST PER PARCEL 46.25$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 1,842.76$ 493 3.74$ Contingency 2,167.95$ 493 4.40$ Capital Improvements 2,418.71$ 493 4.91$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 6,429.42$ COST PER PARCEL 13.04$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 28,108.94$ COST PER PARCEL 59.29$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 23,840.87$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 48.36$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 23,840.87$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 48.36$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 4,268.07$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (3,976.06)$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 9 (68-1540)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 36,537.46$ 1228.98 29.73$ Water 22,842.28$ 1228.98 18.59$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1228.98 0.20$ Backflow Certification 172.83$ 1228.98 0.14$ Tree Trimming 14,209.01$ 1228.98 11.56$ Trash Receptacles 921.80$ 1228.98 0.75$ Electricity 2,532.50$ 1228.98 2.06$ Field Inspection/Management 8,953.98$ 1228.98 7.29$ Repair and Replacement 4,666.62$ 1228.98 3.80$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 91,086.47$ COST PER EDU 74.12$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 6,800.00$ 1228.98 5.53$ Contingency 8,000.00$ 1228.98 6.51$ Capital Improvements 4,336.88$ 1228.98 3.53$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 19,136.88$ COST PEREDU 15.57$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 110,223.35$ COST PER EDU 89.69$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 90,478.89$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.62$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 90,478.89$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.62$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 19,744.46$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (11,233.45)$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 14 (68-1541)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 108,240.00$ 5254.32 20.60$ Water 26,129.54$ 5254.32 4.97$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 5254.32 0.05$ Backflow Certification 59.53$ 5254.32 0.01$ Tree Trimming 17,932.20$ 5254.32 3.41$ Trash Receptacles 1,250.12$ 5254.32 0.24$ Electricity
(Including: Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV, Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen, Monument Lighting)
78,135.06$ 5254.32 14.87 $ Field Inspection/Management 29,339.34$ 5254.32 5.58$ Repair and Replacement 4,643.28$ 5254.32 0.88$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 265,979.07$ COST PER EDU 50.62$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 22,608.22$ 5254.32 4.30$ Contingency 26,597.91$ 5254.32 5.06$ Capital Improvements 12,427.60$ 5254.32 2.37$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 61,633.73$ COST PER EDU 11.73$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 327,612.80$ COST PER EDU 62.35$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 391,922.23$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 74.59$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 327,612.80$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 62.35$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 7,118.74$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 16 (68-1542)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRES Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 5,877.92$ 24.42 240.70$ Water 2,208.09$ 24.42 90.42$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 24.42 10.24$ Backflow Certification 901.68$ 24.42 36.92$ Electricity 164.79$ 24.42 6.75$ Field Inspection/Management 902.24$ 24.42 36.95$ Repair and Replacement 350.00$ 24.42 14.33$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,654.72$ COST PER ACRE 436.31$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRES Administrative Costs 905.65$ 24.42 37.09$ Contingency 1,065.47$ 24.42 43.63$ Capital Improvements 2,485.53$ 24.42 101.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 4,456.65$ COST PER ACRE 182.50$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 15,111.36$ COST PER ACRE 618.81$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 16,877.85$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 691.15$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 15,111.36$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 618.81$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 6,185.08$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 17 (68-1543)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 19,597.83$ 166 118.06$ Water 5,126.10$ 166 30.88$ Backflow Certification 127.15$ 166 0.77$ Tree Trimming 197.96$ 166 1.19$ Electricity 337.80$ 166 2.03$ Field Inspection/Management 2,762.19$ 166 16.64$ Repair and Replacement 1,500.00$ 166 9.04$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 29,649.02$ COST PER PARCEL 178.61$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 2,520.17$ 166 15.18$ Contingency 2,964.90$ 166 17.86$ Capital Improvements 3,106.91$ 166 18.72$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 8,591.98$ COST PER PARCEL 51.76$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 38,241.00$ COST PER PARCEL 230.37$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 39,308.06$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 236.80$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 38,241.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 230.37$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 6,523.38$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 21 (68-1544)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 5,989.50$ 118 50.76$ Water 1,312.30$ 118 11.12$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 118 0.42$ Tree Trimming 3,806.00$ 118 32.25$ Electricity 165.24$ 118 1.40$ Field Inspection/Management 880.00$ 118 7.46$ Repair and Replacement 55.00$ 118 0.47$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 12,258.04$ COST PER PARCEL 103.88$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 1,041.93$ 118 8.83$ Contingency 1,225.80$ 118 10.39$ Capital Improvements 3,106.91$ 118 26.33$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 5,374.64$ COST PER PARCEL 45.55$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 17,632.69$ COST PER PARCEL 149.43$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 13,093.99$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 110.97$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 13,093.99$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 110.97$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 4,538.69$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 2,631.58$
NOTES:

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 34 (68-1545)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 183.70$ 31 5.93$ Field Inspection/Management 56.30$ 31 1.82$ Repair and Replacement 355.21$ 31 11.46$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 595.21$ COST PER PARCEL 19.20$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 50.59$ 31 1.63$ Contingency 59.52$ 31 1.92$ Capital Improvements 500.00$ 31 16.13$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 610.11$ COST PER PARCEL 19.68$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,205.32$ COST PER PARCEL 38.88$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,168.34$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 102.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,107.44$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 67.98$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 826.50$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 61 (68-1546)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 171.60$ 14 12.26$ Field Inspection/Management 343.20$ 14 24.51$ Repair and Replacement 56.30$ 14 4.02$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 571.10$ COST PER PARCEL 40.79$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 48.54$ 14 3.47$ Contingency 57.11$ 14 4.08$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 105.65$ COST PER PARCEL 7.55$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 676.75$ COST PER PARCEL 48.34$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,901.50$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 135.82$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 676.75$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 48.34$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (178.49)$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 73 (68-1547)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7386 -Pats Ranch/Limonite 2,648.64$ 41.35 64.05$ Traffic Signal #7399 -Pats Ranch/64th 10,594.53$ 41.35 256.22$ Traffic Signal #7400 -Pats Ranch/65th 10,594.53$ 41.35 256.22$ Fossil Filters 734.80$ 41.35 17.77$ Field Inspection/Management 1,421.20$ 41.35 34.37$ Repair and Replacement 236.50$ 41.35 5.72$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 26,230.19$ COST PER ACRE 634.35$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 2,229.57$ 41.35 53.92$ Contingency 2,623.02$ 41.35 63.43$ Capital Improvements 3,106.91$ 41.35 75.14$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 7,959.49$ COST PER ACRE 192.49$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 34,189.68$ COST PER ACRE 826.84$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 25,834.37$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 624.77$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 25,834.37$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 624.77$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 8,355.32$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 17,772.89$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Traffic Signal #7386 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500).

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal s #7399 and #7400 were assessed at 100% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signals are 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 78 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 78 (68-1548)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 185.37$ 19 9.76$ Field Inspection/Management 15.03$ 19 0.79$ Repair and Replacement 18.78$ 19 0.99$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 219.18$ COST PER UNIT 11.54$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 18.63$ 19 0.98$ Contingency 21.92$ 19 1.15$ Capital Improvements 900.00$ 19 47.37$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 940.55$ COST PER UNIT 49.50$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,159.72$ COST PER UNIT 61.04$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,370.69$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 124.77$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,155.17$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 113.43$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 95 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 95

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCELS Fossil Filters 693.90$ 26 26.69$ Field Inspection/Management 70.97$ 26 2.73$ Repair and Replacement 56.77$ 26 2.18$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 821.65$ COST PER PARCEL 31.60$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 69.84$ 26 2.69$ Contingency 82.16$ 26 3.16$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 152.00$ COST PER PARCEL 5.85$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 973.65$ COST PER PARCEL 37.45$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,486.58$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 249.48$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,896.89$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 226.80$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 102 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 102

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7358 - Country Village/Vesada 9,844.97$ 18.24 539.75$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 300.00$ 18.24 16.45$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,144.97$ COST PER ACRE 556.19$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 56.10$ 18.24 3.08$ Contingency 66.00$ 18.24 3.62$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 1,500.00$ 18.24 82.24$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,622.10$ COST PER ACRE 88.93$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 11,767.07$ COST PER ACRE 645.12$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,798.00$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 427.52$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,798.00$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 427.52$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 3,969.07$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 6,470.82$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal #7358 was assessed at 75% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 106 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 106 (68-1551)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Fossil Filters 85.80$ 130.53 0.66$ Field Inspection/Management 171.60$ 130.53 1.31$ Repair and Replacement 28.60$ 130.53 0.22$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 286.00$ COST PER ACRE 2.19$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 24.31$ 130.53 0.19$ Contingency 28.60$ 130.53 0.22$ Capital Improvements 40.00$ 130.53 0.31$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 92.91$ COST PER ACRE 0.71$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 378.91$ COST PER ACRE 2.90$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,563.78$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11.98$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,349.55$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 10.34$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 905.95$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 126 (68-1552)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Fossil Filters 213.00$ 192 1.11$ Field Inspection/Management 21.58$ 192 0.11$ Repair and Replacement 17.27$ 192 0.09$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 251.86$ COST PER PARCEL 1.31$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 21.41$ 192 0.11$ Contingency 25.19$ 192 0.13$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 57.85$ COST PER PARCEL 0.24$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 309.70$ COST PER PARCEL 1.56$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,260.06$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32.60$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,690.96$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 29.64$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 128 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 128

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7389 - Rubidoux/20th/Market 2,313.75$ 1.4 1,652.68$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 736.96$ 1.4 526.40$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 3,050.71$ COST PER ACRE 2,179.08$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 259.31$ 1.4 185.22$ Contingency 305.07$ 1.4 217.91$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 564.38$ COST PER ACRE 403.13$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 3,615.09$ COST PER ACRE 2,582.21$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,005.23$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,146.60$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,005.23$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,146.60$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 609.85$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 2,672.84$
NOTES:

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal #7389 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 132 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 132 (68-1554)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #7338 - Bellegrave/Bain 3,535.21$ 32.61 108.41$ Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 1,868.56$ 32.61 57.30$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 974.33$ 32.61 29.88$ Fossil Filters 1,101.67$ 32.61 33.78$ Field Inspection/Management 550.00$ 32.61 16.87$ Repair and Replacement 220.00$ 32.61 6.75$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 8,249.77$ COST PER ACRE 252.98$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 701.23$ 32.61 21.50$ Contingency 824.98$ 32.61 25.30$ Capital Improvements 1,500.00$ 32.61 46.00$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 3,026.21$ COST PER ACRE 92.80$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 11,275.98$ COST PER ACRE 345.78$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,610.01$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 356.03$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,275.98$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 345.78$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 4,122.63$
NOTES:

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Traffic Signal #7338 was assessed at 25% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 137 boundaries would impact the traffic at these intersections.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 137 (68-1555)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 3,300.00$ 9.95 331.66$ Water 1,650.00$ 9.95 165.83$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 9.95 5.53$ Tree Trimming 770.00$ 9.95 77.39$ Bio-swales 165.00$ 9.95 16.58$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 1,102.89$ 9.95 110.84$ Electricity 170.41$ 9.95 17.13$ Field Inspection/Management 18.63$ 9.95 1.87$ Repair and Replacement 110.00$ 9.95 11.06$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 7,341.94$ COST PER ACRE 737.88$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 624.06$ 9.95 62.72$ Contingency 734.19$ 9.95 73.79$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,358.26$ COST PER ACRE #VALUE! TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,700.20$ COST PER ACRE #VALUE! MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 16,499.24$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,658.22$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 14,999.31$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,507.47$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* (200.66)$
NOTES:

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 141 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 141

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 24,750.00$ 80 309.38$ Water 6,348.63$ 80 79.36$ Backflow Certification 220.00$ 80 2.75$ Tree Trimming 9,900.00$ 80 123.75$ Traffic Signal #1152 - Limonite/Wineville 925.50$ 80 11.57$ Fossil Filters 213.22$ 80 2.67$ Field Inspection/Management 985.14$ 80 12.31$ Repair and Replacement 550.00$ 80 6.88$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 43,892.49$ COST PER EDU 548.66$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF EDUS COST PER EDU Administrative Costs 3,730.86$ 80 46.64$ Contingency 4,389.25$ 80 54.87$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 8,120.11$ COST PER EDU 103.99$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 52,012.60$ COST PER EDU 652.65$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 25,316.51$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 316.46$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 23,015.01$
PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 287.69$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* -$
NOTES:

Zone 142 also includes future parkway landscaping, bio-swales, fossil filters, traffic signal (#1505), and graffiti abatement (Phase 1& 2), which when completed may increase the per EDU assessment by $498.40, adjusted for inflation. At FY18-19 this amount would be $632.08, which when added to the current $277.69 be a total of $909.77.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone 142 is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Traffic Signal #1152 was assessed at 10% of the total maintenance cost at the time of annexation ($5,500). The signal is 100% owned and maintained by the City. Percentages were based on how much the developments within Zone 142 boundaries would impact the traffic at this intersection.

No changes on assessment from FY21-22.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

ANNUAL BUDGET
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 142

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Traffic Signal #4572 - CantuGalleano/I-15 514.90$ 9.6 53.64$ Traffic Signal #7348 - CantuGalleano/Caden 1,046.93$ 9.6 109.05$ Traffic Signal #7350 - CantuGalleano/Wineville 1,046.93$ 9.6 109.05$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 1,267.02$ 9.6 131.98$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 3,875.77$ COST PER ACRE 403.73$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 329.44$ 9.6 34.32$ Contingency 387.58$ 9.6 40.37$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 500.00$ 9.6 52.08$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,217.02$ COST PER ACRE 126.77$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 5,092.79$ COST PER ACRE 530.50$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,161.06$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 433.44$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,161.06$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 433.44$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 931.73$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 4,103.34$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 173 (68-1558)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Traffic Signal - Wineville/Mission 7,419.50$ 3 2,473.17$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen 4,431.90$ 3 1,477.30$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 11,851.40$ COST PER PARCEL 3,950.47$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 1,007.37$ 3 335.79$ Contingency 1,185.14$ 3 395.05$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 2,192.51$ COST PER PARCEL 730.84$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 14,043.91$ COST PER PARCEL 4,681.30$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,213.93$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,071.31$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,213.93$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,071.31$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 4,829.98$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD* 8,392.67$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE 182 (68-1559)

ANNUAL BUDGET

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 2,607.00$ 1 2,607.00$ Mulch 499.80$ 1 499.80$ Water 1,496.00$ 1 1,496.00$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 275.00$ 1 275.00$ Backflow Certification 100.00$ 1 100.00$ Tree Trimming 2,170.94$ 1 2,170.94$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 1 220.00$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 438.70$ 1 438.70$ Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED 499.19$ 1 499.19$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 6,810.63$ COST PER PARCEL 6,810.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 79.72$ 1 79.72$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 626.34$ 1 626.34$ Contingency - Landscaping 736.87$ 1 736.87$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 93.79$ 1 93.79$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,536.73$ COST PER PARCEL 1,536.73$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,347.35$ COST PER PARCEL 8,347.35$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,555.47$
MAXIMUM PER EDU ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 9,555.47$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,347.35$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,347.35$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 6,402.42$
NOTES:

Utility Provider: SCE
Water cost included in landscaping item.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE A (68-0023)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Landscaping/Trails/Fence/Dog Park 2,740.51$ 4 685.13$ Annual Landscaping Maintenance 3,183.59$ 4 795.90$ Mulch 331.63$ 4 82.91$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 284.90$ 4 71.23$ Backflow Certification 56.98$ 4 14.25$ Tree Trimming 227.92$ 4 56.98$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 134.97$ 4 33.74$ Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED 458.29$ 4 114.57$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 7,418.79$ COST PER PARCEL 1,854.70$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 48.68$ 4 12.17$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 560.01$ 4 140.00$ Contingency - Landscaping 658.83$ 4 164.71$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 57.27$ 4 14.32$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,324.79$ COST PER PARCEL 331.20$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,743.57$ COST PER PARCEL 2,185.89$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,791.27$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,197.82$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 8,791.27$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,197.82$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 0
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE C (68-9959)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone C is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 5,864.36$ 1 5,864.36$ Mulch 550.00$ 1 550.00$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 1 50.00$ Tree Trimming 295.58$ 1 295.58$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 7,009.95$ COST PER PARCEL 7,009.95$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 595.85$ 1 595.85$ Contingency 700.99$ 1 700.99$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,296.84$ COST PER PARCEL 1,296.84$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 8,306.78$ COST PER PARCEL 8,306.78$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,744.73$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 562.06$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 25,008.76$
NOTES:

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE E (68-0174)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 4,674.40$ 6 779.07$ Mulch 382.43$ 6 63.74$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 6 41.67$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 6 8.34$ Tree Trimming 509.34$ 6 84.89$ Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 347.08$ 6 57.85$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 6,218.25$ COST PER PARCEL 1,035.55$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 28.49$ 6 4.75$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 503.68$ 6 83.95$ Contingency - Landscaping 592.58$ 6 98.76$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,124.75$ COST PER PARCEL 187.46$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 7,343.00$ COST PER PARCEL 1,223.01$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,414.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,235.67$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 7,343.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,223.01$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE F (68-0175)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone F is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 10,940.16$ 24 455.84$ Mulch 995.79$ 24 41.49$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 24 10.42$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 24 2.29$ Tree Trimming 1,680.91$ 24 70.04$ Monument Lighting 569.80$ 24 23.74$ Water Quality Basin 5,698.00$ 24 237.42$ Fertilizer Injector 250.71$ 24 10.45$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 468.49$ 24 19.52$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 20,908.86$ COST PER PARCEL 871.20$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 39.84$ 24 1.66$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 1,740.56$ 24 72.52$ Contingency - Landscaping 2,047.73$ 24 85.32$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 46.88$ 24 1.95$ Ad Valorem RPARCELction (7.32)$ 24 (0.30)$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 3,867.70$ COST PER PARCEL 161.15$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 24,776.56$ COST PER PARCEL 1,032.36$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24,813.78$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,033.91$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24,776.56$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,032.36$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE G (68-9957)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Zone G is not yet maintained. Should that status remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor-Controller's Office, the assessment will not be submitted and therefore not collected.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 3,894.00$ 2 1,947.00$ Mulch 141.23$ 2 70.61$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 2 125.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 2 25.00$ Tree Trimming 256.78$ 2 128.39$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 2 110.00$ Streetlights LS-1 200 W 22000 Lumen LED 393.39$ 2 196.70$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 5,205.41$ COST PER PARCEL 2,602.70$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 33.44$ 2 16.72$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 409.02$ 2 204.51$ Contingency - Landscaping 481.20$ 2 240.60$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 39.34$ 2 19.67$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 963.00$ COST PER PARCEL 481.50$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6,168.41$ COST PER PARCEL 3,084.20$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,816.70$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,408.35$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,816.70$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,408.35$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT (3,351.70)$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD (2,621.73)$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE I (68-9960)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 5,270.31$ 25 210.81$ Mulch 548.99$ 25 21.96$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 25 10.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 25 2.20$ Tree Trimming 1,092.08$ 25 43.68$ Water Quality Basin 5,903.13$ 25 236.13$ Fertilizer Injector 259.74$ 25 10.39$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 1,347.17$ 25 53.89$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 14,726.42$ COST PER PARCEL 589.06$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF UNITS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 114.51$ 25 4.58$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 1,139.36$ 25 45.57$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 134.05$ 25 5.36$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 134.72$ 25 5.39$ Ad Valorem RPARCELction (13.19)$ 25 (0.53)$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,509.44$ COST PER PARCEL 60.38$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 16,235.86$ COST PER PARCEL 649.43$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 17,276.20$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 691.05$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 16,235.86$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 649.43$
ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Street lights costs include general and in-tract streetlights. Refer to Zone K Engineer's Report.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

Water cost included in landscape rate.

ZONE K (68-9961)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
Water meter cost included on landscape rate.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 5,811.96$ 4 1,452.99$ Water 1,777.78$ 4 444.44$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 4 62.50$ Backflow Certification 110.00$ 4 27.50$ Tree Trimming 1,025.64$ 4 256.41$ Fertilizer Injector 501.42$ 4 125.36$ Streetlights LS-1 100 W 9500 Lumen LED 245.29$ 4 61.32$ Electricity 341.88$ 4 85.47$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,063.97$ COST PER PARCEL 2,515.99$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 20.85$ 4 5.21$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 836.72$ 4 209.18$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 984.37$ 4 246.09$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 24.53$ 4 6.13$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,866.46$ COST PER PARCEL 466.61$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 11,930.43$ COST PER PARCEL 2,982.61$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,860.48$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,965.12$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 11,860.48$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,965.12$
ZONE DEFICIT (69.95)$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE L (68-9962)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 6,837.60$ 1 6,837.60$ Mulch 712.25$ 1 712.25$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 1 55.00$ Tree Trimming 256.41$ 1 256.41$ Streetlights LS-1 150 W 9500 Lumen LED 506.67$ 1 506.67$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 8,617.93$ COST PER PARCEL 8,617.93$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 43.07$ 1 43.07$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 691.58$ 1 691.58$ Contingency 813.63$ 1 813.63$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 50.67$ 1 50.67$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,598.94$ COST PER PARCEL 1,598.94$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 10,216.87$ COST PER PARCEL 10,216.87$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 10,255.95$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 539.79$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 10,216.87$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 539.79$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 4,665.68$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE M (68-0234)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 2,808.88$ 2 1,404.44$ Mulch 199.29$ 2 99.64$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 2 125.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 2 27.50$ Tree Trimming 512.82$ 2 256.41$ Streetlights LS-1 22 W 9500 Lumen LED 231.45$ 2 115.73$ Streetlights LS-1 84 W 9500 Lumen LED 118.38$ 2 59.19$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 4,175.82$ COST PER PARCEL 2087.9115

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 29.73$ 2 14.87$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 327.34$ 2 163.67$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 385.10$ 2 192.55$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 34.98$ 2 17.49$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 777.15$ COST PER PARCEL 388.58$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 4,952.97$ COST PER PARCEL 2,476.49$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,991.45$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,495.72$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 4,952.97$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,476.49$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 2,224.51$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE N (68-0235)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 1,641.02$ 10 164.10$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 10 25.00$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 10 5.50$ Tree Trimming 256.41$ 10 25.64$ Streetlights LS-1 39 W 9500 Lumen LED 384.21$ 10 38.42$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 2,586.64$ COST PER PARCEL 258.66$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 32.66$ 10 3.27$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 189.33$ 10 18.93$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 222.74$ 10 22.27$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 38.42$ 10 3.84$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 483.15$ COST PER PARCEL 48.32$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 3,069.80$ COST PER PARCEL 306.98$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,108.88$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 310.89$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,069.80$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 306.98$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD 1,485.67$
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED ZONE O (68-0236)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 13,395.36$ 4 3,348.84$ Mulch 1,395.35$ 4 348.84$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 4 62.50$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 4 12.50$ Tree Trimming 1,150.00$ 4 287.50$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED 753.63$ 4 188.41$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 16,994.34$ COST PER PARCEL 4,248.59$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 64.06$ 4 16.02$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 1,380.56$ 4 345.14$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 1,624.07$ 4 406.02$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 75.36$ 4 18.84$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 3,144.05$ COST PER PARCEL 786.01$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 20,138.39$ COST PER PARCEL 5,034.60$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 20,140.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,035.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 20,140.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,035.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE P (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 4,811.52$ 5 962.30$ Mulch 501.20$ 5 100.24$ Water 3,107.76$ 5 621.55$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 5 50.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 5 10.00$ Tree Trimming 800.00$ 5 160.00$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 5 44.00$ Streetlights LS-1 70 W LED 422.22$ 5 84.44$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED 291.75$ 5 58.35$ Electricity 300.00$ 5 60.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 10,754.45$ COST PER PARCEL 2,150.89$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 60.69$ 5 12.14$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 853.44$ 5 170.69$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 1,004.05$ 5 200.81$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 71.40$ 5 14.28$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 1,989.58$ COST PER PARCEL 397.92$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 12,744.03$ COST PER PARCEL 2,548.81$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 12,744.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,549.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 12,744.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,549.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE T (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 2,281.00$ 1 2,281.00$ Mulch 237.60$ 1 237.60$ Water 1,198.98$ 1 1,198.98$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 50.00$ 1 50.00$ Tree Trimming 500.00$ 1 500.00$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 1 220.00$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W LED 145.88$ 1 145.88$ Streetlights LS-1 22 W LED 117.84$ 1 117.84$ Electricity 300.00$ 1 300.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 5,301.30$ COST PER PARCEL 5,301.30$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 22.36$ 1 22.36$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 428.19$ 1 428.19$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 503.75$ 1 503.75$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 26.30$ 1 26.30$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 980.60$ COST PER PARCEL 980.60$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 6,281.90$ COST PER PARCEL 6,281.90$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 6,281.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE U (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 3,041.50$ 3 1,013.83$ Mulch 316.80$ 3 105.60$ Water Meter 64.90$ 3 21.63$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 3 83.33$ Backflow Certification 55.00$ 3 18.33$ Tree Trimming 247.50$ 3 82.50$ Streetlights LS-1 82 W 9500 Lumen LED 277.20$ 3 92.40$ Electricity 330.00$ 3 110.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 4,582.90$ COST PER PARCEL 1,527.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Streetlights 24.20$ 3 8.07$ Administrative Costs - Landscaping 368.50$ 3 122.83$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 433.40$ 3 144.47$ Operating Reserve - Streetlights 27.50$ 3 9.17$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 853.60$ COST PER PARCEL 284.53$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1 5,500.00$ COST PER PARCEL 1,900.00$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,500.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,833.33$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 5,500.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,833.33$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
CARRYFORWARD -$
NOTES:
1 Rounded to the nearest hundred.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE S (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021
Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Annual Landscaping Maintenance 13,038.72$ 1 13,038.72$ Mulch 1,459.50$ 1 1,459.50$ Water 7,923.36$ 1 7,923.36$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 250.00$ 1 250.00$ Backflow Certification 100.00$ 1 100.00$ Tree Trimming 4,400.00$ 1 4,400.00$ Fertilizer Injector 220.00$ 1 220.00$ Electricity 300.00$ 1 300.00$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 27,691.58$ COST PER PARCEL 27,691.58$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs - Landscaping 2,353.78$ 1 2,353.78$ Operating Reserve - Landscaping 2,769.16$ 1 2,769.16$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 5,122.94$ COST PER PARCEL 5,122.94$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 32,814.52$ COST PER PARCEL 32,814.52$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 32,815.00$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE X (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Annual Landscaping Maintenance 42,284.22$ 202.02 209.31$ Mulch 1,459.50$ 202.02 7.22$ Water 9,804.00$ 202.02 48.53$ CalSense Subscription & Monitoring 500.00$ 202.02 2.48$ Backflow Certification 100.00$ 202.02 0.50$ Tree Trimming 20,000.00$ 202.02 99.00$ Graffitti Abatement 3.25$ 202.02 0.02$ Fertilizer Injector 3,400.00$ 202.02 16.83$ Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Cactus Ave 5,000.00$ 202.02 24.75$ Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Sandstone Rd 10,000.00$ 202.02 49.50$ Traffic Signal El Rivino Rd & Cedar/Rubidoux Blvd 4,000.00$ 202.02 19.80$ Traffic Signal - El Rivino Rd & Hall Ave 4,000.00$ 202.02 19.80$ Traffic Signal - Agua Mansa Rd/ Market St 2,000.00$ 202.02 9.90$ Traffic Signal - Rubidoux Blvd & Market St/20th St 3,000.00$ 202.02 14.85$ Streetlights LS-1 LED (El Rivino Rd, Hall Ave, Brown Ave) 612.08$ 202.02 3.03$ Streetlights LS-1 LED (Rubidoux Blvd) 1,960.61$ 202.02 9.71$ Electricity 600.00$ 202.02 2.97$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 108,723.66$ COST PER ACRE 538.18$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs (8%) 8,684.46$ 202.02 42.99$ Inspections (5%) 5,427.79$ 202.02 26.87$ Operating Reserve, Repairs, and Replacements (10%) 10,855.57$ 202.02 53.74$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 24,967.82$ COST PER ACRE 123.59$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 133,691.48$ COST PER ACRE 661.77$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 133,524.00$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 660.94$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 133,524.00$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 660.94$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY 21-22 CARRYFORWARD2 -$
NOTES:
2 FY22-23 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED

ZONE Z (TBD)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

20 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS

A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Theref ore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.

Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the Riverside County Assessor.

APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Page B-1

Page B-2

Page B-3

Page B-4

Page B-5

Page B-6

Page B-7

Page B-8

Page B-9

Page B-10

Page B-11

Page B-12

Page B-13

Page B-14

Page B-15

Page B-16

Page B-17

Page B-18

Page B-19

Page B-20

Page B-21

Page B-22

Page B-23

Page B-24

Page B-25

Page B-26

Page B-27

Page B-28

Page B-29

Page B-30

Page B-31

Page B-32

Page B-33

Page B-34

Page B-35

Page B-36

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED º
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGUA
MANSARD
EL RIVINO RD
BROWN
AVE
HALLAVE
VICINITY MAP
ZONE E
POR. TRACT OF JURUPA RANCHO For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the applicable Assessor s Parcel Numbers, refer to the County Assessor s Map as of the date of the Report.
SHEET 1 OF 1
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT 1500 Iowa Avenue Suite 210 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 787-8421 Fax (951) 682-3379 175-220-021-6
Project Site
HALL AVE
JUNE 2017
NTSP S O M A S
175-220-021-6
EL RIVINO RD
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM / BOUNDARY MAP PM 24088
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED º
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEDLEY
RD
AG
ATE
ST
TO
M
CIR
TOTTEN PL
KIM LNGREG PLTERRIE TER
54TH ST
VICINITY MAP
ZONE F
POR. SE 1/4, S 1/2, SEC 14, T.2S. R6W For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the applicable Assessor s Parcel Numbers, refer to the County Assessor s Map as of the date of the Report.
SHEET 1 OF 1
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT 1500 Iowa Avenue Suite 210 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 787-8421 Fax (951) 682-3379 169310013-2
Project Site
PEDLEY RD
JUNE 2017
NTSP S O M A S
169310013-2
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM / BOUNDARY MAP TR 36912
12 | P a g e

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE I
4802 Etiwanda Avenue

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA POR NW1/4, SEC 16, T.2S, R6W

159-101-031

Project Site
159-101-051
159-101-051

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE M
PM 37125 – PILOT FLYING J

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 21 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, PORTIONS OF LOTS F, 20, 27, 28, AND 51 THROUGH 58, INCLUSIVE, OF THE HOOVER TRACT, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 17, PAGE 56, OF MAPS, TOETHER WITH THOSE PROTIONS OF LOTS 3, 6, 11, 14 AND THE SOUTH HALF OF A 40 FOOT ROAD OF THE MAP OF THE WEST COAST DEVELOPMENT COMPANY’S SUBDIVISION, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 60, OF MAPS, BOTH FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY.

For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
156-120-005 through 156-120-019 (inclusive), 156-
120-025, 156-120-028, 156-120-030, 156-120-032,
and 156-090-026

ETIWANDA AVE

RIVERSIDE DR
Project Site

VICINITY MAP
PM 37125

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE O
TR 32723

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA E ½ W ½ NW ¼ SEC 18 T.2S. R.5W.

VICINITY MAP
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
183-310-034, 183-310-035, 183-310-036,
183-310-037, 183-310-038, 183-310-039,
183-310-040, 183-310-041, 183-310-042,
183-310-043
Project Site
183-310-034
183-310-036
183-310-038
183-310-037
183-310-041
183-310-042
183-310-035
183-310-040
183-310-039
183-310-043
14 | P a g e

VICINITY MAP

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE S

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA POR SO ½ SEC.30, T.2S, R.6W

ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.

Subzone Boundary
152-020-021
152-020-022
152-020-012

Project Site

PATS RANCH ROAD
FREEWAY I-15
68TH STREET

IVORY STREET

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ZONE U

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC.10 T.2S R.5W
26TH ST

RUBIDOUX BLVD

AVALON ST

LOCATION MAPVICINITY MAP

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER AS

OF DATE OF ENGINEER'S REPORT
178-140-027
¯
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT
P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI,
Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
SITE
¯

FOR DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND

DIMENSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE ASSESSOR'S

PARCEL NUMBERS, REFER TO THE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP AS OF THE DATE OF THE REPORT.
178-140-027
Subzone Boundary
14 | P a g e

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED ZONE Z LLMD89-1-C
PM 37528

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4, 7, 8, 9 AND 15 AND PORTION OF LOT 3, ALL LOTS OF MAP OF RIVINO HEIGHTS BLOCK 1, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGES 145 OF MAPS, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF RIVINO BOULEVARD (VACATED), ALSO TOGETHER WITH LOTS 1 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, OF RIVINO GARDENS, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21, PAGE 29 OF MAPS, ALSO TOGETEHR WITH PARCEL “B” OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 5218, RECORDED MAY 29, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0291639 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND PARCELS “A”, “B”, AND “C” OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA 1718, RECORDED JUNE 30, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0394779 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, ALL IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WITH SECTIONS 2 AND 3, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF.

ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT 175-170-040 (A)
175-170-046 (P)
175-200-001 (P)
175-200-008 (P)

175-200-008 (P)
For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.

Subzone Boundary
ALL

PORTION
175-170-036
175-170-040
175-170-043
175-170-046

Project Site
175-180-001
175-200-001
175-200-002
175-200-003

175-200-003
175-200-004
175-200-005
175-200-007

175-200-008
175-200-009

VICINITY MAP
175-200-002 (A)
175-200-003 (A)
175-200-004 (A)
175-200-005 (A)
175-200-007 (A)
175-170-046 (A)
175-170-043 (A)
175-170-046 (P)
175-180-001 (P)
175-200-001 (P)
175-200-009 (P)

175-170-046 (P)
175-180-001 (P)
175-200-009 (P)

175-170-046 (A)

EL RIVINO ROAD
(A)
(P)
Legend
175-200-008 (A)

21 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

The following Assess Rolls for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were prepared for this report:
(See next page).

V
8 9 3 0 L i m o n i t e A v e n u e | J u r u p a V a l l e y , C A 9 2 5 0 9 MAY 2022

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FY 2022-2023
FOR

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING

MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED
VOLUME 2

STREET LIGHTING ZONES
5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, AND 2-F
Prepared By:

HR Green Pacific
1260 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 305
855.900.4742

www.hrgreen.com

2 | P a g e

AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

SUBJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) - CITYWIDE

TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL

ENGINEER’S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) has been prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum assessments that can be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel of land within each Zone of the District.

The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the pro visions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 , being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:

Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Di strict No. 89-1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing wi th Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Divisio n 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and arti cle of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of t he costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and be nefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.

Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on beh alf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:

3 | P a g e

1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited there by in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, sh owing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and par cels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the nu mbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.

4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2 -C, 2-D, 2-E and 2-F that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

May 19, 2022.

Steve Loriso, R.C.E. 64701

4 | P a g e

Table of Contents
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 5 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .......................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 6 ASSESSMENT UNITS .................................................................................................................................. 6 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ................................................................................... 7 Description of Improvements per Zone ................................................................................................ 8 Maintenance Plans .............................................................................................................................. 10 PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ................................................................................................... 11 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 11 SPECIAL BENEFIT ..................................................................................................................................... 11 GENERAL BENEFIT ................................................................................................................................... 13 PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES .......................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 14 BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE ..................................................................................................................... 14 PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 16 PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS ..................................................................................................................... 17

5 | P a g e

BACKGROUND

The Report is prepared in compliance with the requi rements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Par t 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and High ways Code.

Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all annual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professi onal engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.

The 1972 Act provides for the annual levy of assessments for the Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C, for the express pu rpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing landscaping, trails, fossil filters, bio-swales, st reetlights, traffic signals, basins, and graffiti a batement improvements. The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments f or an assessment district after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provisions in Proposition 218.

Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the improvements, and refers to the Report for details of the Distric t. The Resolution of Intention also sets a time and place for a hearing on the annual levy of assessments for the District.

6 | P a g e

PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

INTRODUCTION
The Plans and Specifications portion of the report describes the improvements in the District. Plans a nd specifications for the improvements are as set fort h on the list thereof, attached hereto, and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer of the City of Jurupa Valley.

There are 70 locations within the District: 41 separate assessment zones with 50 locations (Zones 4, 5, and 21 have multiple locations), and 20 street lighting assessment zones with 20 locations.

There are
52 maintained locations within the City. Seventeen (1 7) locations within the District have no improvements or have not completed the turnover process and are, therefore, not yet maintained by the City; and one (1) location within the District consist of improvements currently maintained by the property owner(s) within the boundary of the respective zone. The Assessment Zones that have no improvements are zones 95, 102, 128, 141, 142, F, G, P, and Z, an d Street Lighting Zone 69. The City will begin maintenance of the improvements on eight (8) locati ons within the District on Fiscal Year 2022-2023; these locations are in Assessment District Zone K, L, O, S, T , U, X, and Street Lighting Zone 2-E.

The Annual Engineer’s Report will cover the 61 exis ting Zones (70 locations). New or pending Zones wil l be presented to the City Council under separate reports.

Total number of Zones/Locations: 61 (70 locations)
Assessment Zones: 41 (50 locations)
Street Lighting Assessment Zones: 20 (20 locations )

Total number of Maintained Locations (Volume 1 Engineer’s Report): 34 – within 25 Assessment Zones

Total number of Maintained Street Lighting Location s (Volume 2 Engineer’s Report): 18 – within 18 Assessment Zones

The designation of the existing District and Zones is as follows:

Volume 1: Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, and Z.

Volume 2: Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F.

ASSESSMENT UNITS
Acreage based: Zones 7, 17, 78, 106, 126, 132, 137, 141, 173, and Z; and Street Lighting Zones 17, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, and 102.

7 | P a g e

Parcel based: Zones 5, 6, 9, 21, 34, 61, 73, 95, 102, 128, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, and X; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 19, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F

EDU based: Zones 4, 14, 16, and 142.

Maintained Zones/Locations: Zone 4 locations 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B, Zone 5 Lo cations 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D, Zone 6, Zone 7, Zone 9, Zone 14, Zone 16, Zone 17, Zone 21 Locations 1 through 3, Zone 34, Zone 61, Zone 73, Zone 78, Zone 106, Zone 126, Zone 132, Zon e 137, Zone 173, Zone 182, Zone A, Zone E, Zone I, Zone M, Zone N, and Zone X; and Street Lighting Zon e 5, Street Lighting Zone 7, Street Lighting Zone 1 5, Street Lighting Zone 17, Street Lighting Zone 19, S treet Lighting Zone 39, Street Lighting Zone 41, St reet Lighting Zone 62, Street Lighting Zone 86, Street Lighting Zone 91, Street Lighting Zone 93, Street Lighting Zone 94, Street Lighting Zone 102, Street Lighting Zone 2-A, Street Lighting Zone 2-B, Street Lighting Zone 2-C, Street Lighting Zone 2-D, and Street Lighting Zone 2-F.

Not Yet Maintained Zones/Locations (improvements no t yet installed and/or accepted for maintenance): Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Zone C, Zone F, Zone G, Zone K, Zone L, Zone O, Zone P, Zone S, Zone T, Zone U, Zone X, Zone Z, Street Lighting Zone 69, and Street Lightin g Zone 2-E.

Zero Assessment Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone 142, Z one C, Zone F, Zone P, and Street Lighting Zone 69.

DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
The improvements for the District and Zones may be generally described as follows:

The installation, maintenance and servicing of orna mental structures, fences, multi-purpose trails, including trees, shrubs, grass, and other ornamenta l vegetation, and appurtenant facilities, including irrigation systems, street lighting, traffic signals, bridge lights, and drainage devices (bio swales and fossil filters), located in public rights-of-way within th e boundaries of the Zones. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordina ry and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: repair, removal, or replacement of all or part of any improvement; providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandbl asting, and painting of walls and other improvement s to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the fu rnishing of electricity for the lighting and operat ion of any ornamental structures, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities; water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities.

8 | P a g e

is not limited to, the removal, repair, replacement and appurtenances, electrical energy, supplies, engineering and incidental costs relating to the ma intenance and operation of the improvements benefiting the District’s parcels.

Description of Improvements per Zone

Street Lighting Zone 5:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 5 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Galena Street
Street Lighting Zone 7:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 7 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Jurupa Road
Street Lighting Zone 15 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 15 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Etiwanda Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 17 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 17 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

La Rue Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 19 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 19 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Rubidoux Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 39 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 39 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Limonite Avenue
Street Lighting Zone 41 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 41 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Riverview Drive
Street Lighting Zone 62 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 62 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20 th Street

9 | P a g e

Street Lighting Zone 69 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 69 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Carrerra Court Mustang Lane
Street Lighting Zone 86 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 86 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue Rutile Street
Street Lighting Zone 91 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 91 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Amarillo Street Mission Boulevard
Street Lighting Zone 93 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 93 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
37 th Street Wallace Street
Street Lighting Zone 94 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 94 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20 th Street Van Dell Road
Street Lighting Zone 102 :

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 102 generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Fleming Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-A:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-A generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bain Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-B:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-B generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Mission Boulevard Pyrite Street
Street Lighting Zone 2-C:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-C generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Lamelas Cir Sunnyhill Drive
Street Lighting Zone 2-D:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-D generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Iberia Street Etiwanda Avenue

10 | P a g e

Street Lighting Zone 2-E:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-E generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:
20 th Street Caterpillar Court
Street Lighting Zone 2-F:

Maintenance of improvements to be funded by Street Lighting Zone 2-F generally streetlight improvements within public right-of-ways of:

Bellegrave Avenue
Maintenance Plans
Plans for the improvements for the Zones are volum inous and are not bound in this Report but by th8s reference are incorporated and made a part of this Report. The Plans for maintained zones are on file at City Hall, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, where they are available for public inspection.

The following improvement plans are available for copies at City Hall:

ZONE PLAN NUMBER
Zone 2 -A IP17 -007
Zone 2 -B IP16 -010
Zone 2 -C IP16 -009
Zone 2 -D IP18 -007
Zone 2 -E GP19 -007
Zone 2 -F IP18 -001

11 | P a g e

PART II – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT

INTRODUCTION
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the cons truction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value.
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments reflec ts the composition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

In addition, Article XIII(D) of the California Cons titution (“Article”) requires that a parcel’s asses sment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportio nal special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are ass essable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a p arcel. A special benefit is a particular and disti nct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the district. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.

SPECIAL BENEFIT
The maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trail s, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlight s, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti ab atement provides direct and special benefit to thos e properties located within Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”).

Each and every lot or parcel within the District, r eceives a particular and distinct benefit from th e improvements over and above general benef its conferred by the improvements. First, the improvements were conditions of approval for the cr eation or development of the parcels. In order to create or develop the parcels, the County or City r equired the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels.

Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.

12 | P a g e

those properties in close proximity to the landscap ing. Improved erosion and water quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., cont rol sight distance restrictions and fire haza rds), improved neighborhood property protection a nd aesthetics, controlling or restricting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and increasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the District. Stre etlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the Distric t during the nighttime hours, and to assign right-o f- ways for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.

Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District. Streetlights ar e installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed.

Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purposes of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user of the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility.

The system of streets within the District is establ ished to provide access to each parcel in the Distr ict.

Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, s pecial benefit of the parcels within the District.

Finally, the servicing of streetlights provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being fo r properties within the District.

Based on the benefits described above, streetlights are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government-owned easements, utility easements, or flood channel parc els. Government-owned easement, utility easement and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on such parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant, narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generate or e xperience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or ot her structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels, they do not receive

13 | P a g e

any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.

Special Benefit of Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated Authorized Improvements and Services:
• The installation or construction of public lighting facilities, including traffic signals, • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing, or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenan ce or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, t he installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks or paving, water irrigation, drainage or electrical facilities, and; • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.

GENERAL BENEFIT
The total benefit from the works of improvement is a combination of the special benefits to the parcel s within the District and the general benefits to the public at large and to adjacent property owners. The portion of the total streetlight servicing costs associated with general benefits will not be assessed to the parcels in the District, but will be paid from othe r City Funds. Because the streetlights are located immediately adjacent to properties within the Distr ict and are maintained solely for the benefit of th e properties within the District, any benefit receive d by properties outside of the District will be in the proportions stated under Special Benefit. As a result, no property is assessed in excess of the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that property.

14 | P a g e

PART III – ESTIMATE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES

INTRODUCTION
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in Section 22569 of the 1972 Act.

The 1972 Act also provides that the amount of any s urplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the Zones is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.

The inflation factor, for those zones with an infla tion factor in place, may increase budgets for Zone s, which have not been accepted for maintenance, as if assessed. However, the amount to levy may be credited resulting in a zero assessment.

Each succeeding fiscal year the maximum assessment for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, and 2-F, may be subject to an annual adjustment that is the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for Electricity (as applicable) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario County California Standard Metropolitan Statist ical area or, as implemented on December 2017, Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Statistical area (“Index”) published by the Bureau of Labor Statistic s of the United States Department of Labor. The annua l CPI-U for All Items or CPI-U for Electricity adjustment will be based on the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on March of each year over the base Index. Any increase larger than the greater of two percent, the CPI-U for All Items , or CPI-U for Electricity annual adjustment requires a majority approval of all the property owners within each of the benefit zones in the District.

There is a two percent proposed inflationary increa se in the maximum assessment per parcel or per acre as applicable in Street Lighting Zones 7, 41, 62, 69, 86, 93, and 102 over the maximum assessment for fiscal year 2021-2022 (if applicable), and is c onsistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.

BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE
Projected maintenance cost for zones maintained dur ing fiscal year 2022-2023 was based on the best available data provided by the City for expenditure s, CPI-U increases for the area, and current maintenance rates. The following provided documents by the City were referenced:

1. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 310-Exp. Detail Rpt.

2. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; 320-Exp. Detail Rpt.

3. Expenditure Detail Report dated 03/21/2022; CFD-Exp. Detail Rpt.

4. City of Jurupa Valley Expenditures By GL dated 03/2 1/2022; CFD-LLMD 21-22 YEAR END ESTIMATES by GL-Final

15 | P a g e

5. FY 2021-22 LLMD & CFD FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estim ates by Zone dated 03/21/2022; CFD- LLMD 21-22 YEAR END ESTIMATES
The following Annual Budget sheets for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were prepared for this report:
(See next page)

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 551.23$ 1 551.23$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 551.23$ COST PER PARCEL 551.23$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 46.85$ 1 46.85$ Contingency 55.12$ 1 55.12$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 27.56$ 1 27.56$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 129.54$ COST PER PARCEL 129.54$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 680.77$ COST PER PARCEL 680.77$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 677.79$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 2.98$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 5 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 275.63$ 1 275.63$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 275.63$ COST PER PARCEL 275.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 23.43$ 1 23.43$ Contingency 27.56$ 1 27.56$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 13.78$ 1 13.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 64.77$ COST PER PARCEL 64.77$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 340.40$ COST PER PARCEL 340.40$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 369.17$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 369.17$ .

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 7 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 551.23$ 1 551.23$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 551.23$ COST PER PARCEL 551.23$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 46.85$ 1 46.85$ Contingency 55.12$ 1 55.12$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 25.00$ 1 25.00$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 126.98$ COST PER PARCEL 126.98$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 678.21$ COST PER PARCEL 678.21$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 679.54$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 679.54$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 678.21$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 678.21$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 15 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 1,152.84$ 9.85 117.04$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 253.07$ 9.85 25.69$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,405.91$ COST PER ACRE 142.73$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 119.50$ 9.85 12.13$ Contingency 25.31$ 9.85 2.57$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 70.30$ 9.85 7.14$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 215.10$ COST PER ACRE 21.84$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,621.01$ COST PER ACRE 164.57$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,731.96$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 175.83$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,621.01$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 164.57$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 17 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 275.63$ 1 275.63$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 275.63$ COST PER PARCEL 275.63$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 23.43$ 1 23.43$ Contingency 27.56$ 1 27.56$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 13.78$ 1 13.78$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 64.77$ COST PER PARCEL 64.77$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 340.40$ COST PER PARCEL 340.40$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 374.22$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 374.22$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 340.40$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 19 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 730.59$ 4.72 154.79$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 730.59$ COST PER ACRE 154.79$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 62.10$ 4.72 13.16$ Contingency 73.06$ 4.72 15.48$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 30.00$ 4.72 6.36$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 165.16$ COST PER ACRE 34.99$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 895.75$ COST PER ACRE 189.78$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 346.27$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.36$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 346.27$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 73.36$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 549.48$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 39 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 187.98$ 0.37 508.05$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 187.98$ COST PER ACRE 508.05$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 15.98$ 0.37 43.18$ Contingency 18.80$ 0.37 50.81$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 10.00$ 0.37 27.03$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 44.78$ COST PER ACRE 121.02$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 232.76$ COST PER ACRE 629.07$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 414.21$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,119.49$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 414.21$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,119.49$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 41 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 551.23$ 3.84 143.55$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 551.23$ COST PER ACRE 143.55$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 46.85$ 3.84 12.20$ Contingency 55.12$ 3.84 14.36$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 25.00$ 3.84 6.51$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 126.98$ COST PER ACRE 33.07$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 678.21$ COST PER ACRE 176.62$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 941.57$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 245.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 941.57$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 245.20$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 62 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 450.00$ 6.45 69.77$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 450.00$ COST PER ACRE 69.77$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRE COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 38.25$ 6.45 5.93$ Contingency 45.00$ 6.45 6.98$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 83.25$ COST PER ACRE 12.91$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 533.25$ COST PER ACRE 82.67$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,538.34$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 393.54$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 2,537.76$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 393.45$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Zone 69 is not maintained. No assessment will be submitted to Controller's Office.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 69 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 695.08$ 20.18 34.44$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 884.65$ 20.18 43.84$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,579.73$ COST PER ACRE 78.28$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 134.28$ 20.18 6.65$ Contingency 157.97$ 20.18 7.83$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 78.99$ 20.18 3.91$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 371.24$ COST PER ACRE 18.40$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,950.97$ COST PER ACRE 96.68$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,697.01$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 183.20$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,697.01$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 183.20$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 86 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 718.72$ 3.87 185.72$ Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 2,275.98$ 3.87 588.11$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 2,994.70$ COST PER ACRE 773.82$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 254.55$ 3.87 65.77$ Contingency 299.47$ 3.87 77.38$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 100.00$ 3.87 25.84$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 654.02$ COST PER ACRE 169.00$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 3,648.71$ COST PER ACRE 942.82$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,523.55$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 910.48$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 3,523.55$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 910.48$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 125.16$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 91 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 377.18$ 0.5 754.36$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 377.18$ COST PER ACRE 754.36$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 32.06$ 0.5 64.12$ Contingency 37.72$ 0.5 75.44$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 18.86$ 0.5 37.72$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 88.64$ COST PER ACRE 177.27$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 465.82$ COST PER ACRE 931.63$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 938.35$
MAXIMUM PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,876.70$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 938.35$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,876.70$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 93 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 22000 Lumen HPSV 1,288.40$ 3.66 352.02$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,288.40$ COST PER ACRE 352.02$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 109.51$ 3.66 29.92$ Contingency 128.84$ 3.66 35.20$ Maintained Positive Fund Balance 60.00$ 3.66 16.39$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 298.35$ COST PER ACRE 81.52$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,586.75$ COST PER ACRE 433.54$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,163.75$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 317.96$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,163.75$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 317.96$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT 423.01$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Deficits to be made up by the City of Jurupa Valley.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 94 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Streetlights LS-1 9500 Lumen HPSV 255.31$ 2.38 107.27$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 255.31$ COST PER ACRE 107.27$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF ACRES COST PER ACRE Administrative Costs 21.70$ 2.38 9.12$ Contingency 25.53$ 2.38 10.73$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 47.23$ COST PER ACRE 19.85$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 302.54$ COST PER ACRE 127.12$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 459.88$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 193.23$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 302.54$
PER ACRE ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 127.12$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD -$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
* There is a 2% infationary increase in the maximum assessment per unit applicable for this zone.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 102 (68-1560)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent 599.94$ 3 199.98 $ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 599.94$ COST PER PARCEL 199.98$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 50.99$ 3 17.00$ Operating Reserve 59.99$ 1 59.99$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 110.99$ COST PER PARCEL 76.99$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 710.93$ COST PER PARCEL 276.97$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 715.01$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 715.01$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 710.93$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 236.98$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 1,108.80$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-A (68-9963)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 100 Watt 9,500 Lumen LED Equivalent 112.87$ 3 37.62$ Street Lights - 200 Watt 22,000 Lumen LED Equivalent 124.25$ 3 41.42 $ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 237.12$ COST PER PARCEL 79.04$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 20.15$ 3 6.72$ Operating Reserve 23.71$ 3 7.90$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 43.87$ COST PER PARCEL 14.62$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 280.98$ COST PER PARCEL 93.66$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 282.57$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 94.19$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 280.98$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 93.66$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 339.62$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-B (68-9956)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 50 Watt LED 335.73$ 16 20.98$ Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 122.27$ 16 7.64$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 458.00$ COST PER PARCEL 28.62$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 38.93$ 16 2.43$ Operating Reserve 45.80$ 16 2.86$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 84.73$ COST PER PARCEL 5.30$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 542.73$ COST PER PARCEL 33.92$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 545.78$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 34.11$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 542.73$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 33.92$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 419.78$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-C (68-9964)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 150 Watt LED 771.65$ 2 385.83$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 771.65$ COST PER PARCEL 385.83$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 65.59$ 2 32.80$ Operating Reserve 77.17$ 2 38.58$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 142.76$ COST PER PARCEL 71.38$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 914.41$ COST PER PARCEL 457.20$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 919.55$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 459.77$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 914.41$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 457.20$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 754.20$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:
1 FY20-21 First year of assessment.

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-D (68-0238)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 85 Watt LED 1,201.60$ 8 150.20$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 1,201.60$ COST PER PARCEL 150.20$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 102.14$ 8 12.77$ Operating Reserve 120.16$ 8 15.02$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 222.30$ COST PER PARCEL 27.79$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 1,423.89$ COST PER PARCEL 177.99$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,431.90$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 178.99$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 1,423.89$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 177.99$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 1,224.52$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-E (68-0239)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Street Lights - 85 Watt LED 121.88$ 6 20.31$ TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 121.88$ COST PER PARCEL 20.31$

INCIDENTAL COSTS
FUNCTION PROJECTED ANNUAL COST No. OF PARCELS COST PER PARCEL Administrative Costs 10.36$ 6 1.73$ Operating Reserve 12.19$ 6 2.03$ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS 22.55$ COST PER PARCEL 3.76$ TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS 144.43$ COST PER PARCEL 24.07$ MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 145.24$
MAXIMUM PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24.21$
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 144.43$
PER PARCEL ASSESSMENT FY 22-23 24.07$
PROJECTED ZONE DEFICIT -$
FY21-22 CARRYFORWARD 45.34$
UTILITY PROVIDER : SCE
NOTES:

Carryforward amount per FYE Expenditure/Revenue Estimates by Zone report.

JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1-CONSOLIDATED STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-F (68-0240)

ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

16 | P a g e

PART IV – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS

A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith and made a part hereof.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a parcel has changed subsequent to the date of this Report, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate.

APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS
Page B-1

Page B-2

Page B-3

Page B-4

Page B-5

Page B-6

Page B-7

Page B-8

Page B-9

Page B-10

Page B-11

Page B-12

Page B-13

Page B-14

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-A
Serrano Business Center (PM 36828)

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 9, T.2S., R.6W., S.B.M. Schedule “E”

VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT
156-210-093

156-210-093

Project Site
For details concerning the lines and dimensions of the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel numbers, refer to the County Assessor’s Map as of the date of the Report

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-B
TR 36977

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA T2SR6W SEC 12 PSEC

171-260-013
Project Site

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2 - C
TR 32722

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEC 7, T.2S, R. 5W

174-170-039
174-170-03040
174-170-03041

Project Site

For details concerning the lines and
dimensions of the applicable Assessor’s
Parcel numbers, refer to the County
Assessor’s Map as of the date of the
Report.

ASSEMENT DIAGRAM/ BOUNDARY MAP

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED
ZONE 2-E

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 3, T. 2 S, R. 5 W, S.B.M.

ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER AS
OF DATE OF ENGINEER’S REPORT

VICINITY MAP
Subzone Boundary
175-160-027 175-160-044
Project Site
175-160-028 175-160-045
175-160-038 175-160-046
175-160-042 175-160-047
175-160-027
175-160-028
175-160-045
175-160-038
175-160-042
175-160-044
175-160-047
175-160-046

17 | P a g e

PART V – ASSESSMENT ROLLS

The following Assess Rolls for Fiscal Year 2022-2023
were prepared for this report:
(See next page).

ASSESSMENT ROLLS

STREETLIGHT ZONES
DISTRICT 68 1560
DISTRICT 68 1560

ZONE APN ASSESSMENT
5 167110020 677.79$
7 183112054 340.40$
17 179040023 209.00$
17 179040024 753.73$
17 179040022 141.53$
17 179040026 516.75$
19 178251011 340.40$
39 162220017 346.27$
41 182311009 414.21$
62 178020026 941.57
86 170340026 40.30$
86 170340031 3,656.67$
91 169100059 1,210.94$
91 169100053 2,312.62$
93 179252015 300.27$
93 179252035 281.51$
93 179252036 337.81$
94 178020033 1,163.75$
102 173130008 302.55$
Volume 2

ASSESSMENT ROLLS

STREETLIGHT ZONES
DISTRICT 68 9963
DISTRICT 68 9963

ZONE APN ASSESSMENT
2-A 156210097 236.98$
2-A 156210096 236.98$
2-A 156210095 236.98$
Volume 2

ASSESSMENT ROLLS

STREETLIGHT ZONES
DISTRICT 68 9956
DISTRICT 68 9956

ZONE APN ASSESSMENT
2-B 171260023 93.66$
2-B 171260025 93.66$
2-B 171260014 93.66$
Volume 2

ASSESSMENT ROLLS

STREETLIGHT ZONES
DISTRICT 68-9964
DISTRICT 68 9964

ZONE APN ASSESSMENT
2-C 174170056 33.92$
2-C 174170057 33.92$
2-C 174170058 33.92$
2-C 174170059 33.92$
2-C 174170060 33.92$
2-C 174170061 33.92$
2-C 174170062 33.92$
2-C 174170063 33.92$
2-C 174170064 33.92$
2-C 174170065 33.92$
2-C 174170066 33.92$
2-C 174170067 33.92$
2-C 174170068 33.92$
2-C 174170069 33.92$
2-C 174170070 33.92$
2-C 174170071 33.92$
Volume 2

ASSESSMENT ROLLS

STREETLIGHT ZONES
DISTRICT 68-0238
DISTRICT 68 0238

ZONE APN ASSESSME
NT
2-D 156140060 457.20$
2-D 156140061 457.20$
Volume 2

ASSESSMENT ROLLS

STREETLIGHT ZONES
DISTRICT 68-0239
DISTRICT 68 0239

ZONE APN ASSESSMENT
2-E 175160027 177.99$
2-E 175160028 177.99$
2-E 175160038 177.99$
2-E 75160042 177.99$
2-E 175160044 177.99$
2-E 175160045 177.99$
2-E 175160046 177.99$
2-E 175160047 177.99$
Volume 2

ASSESSMENT ROLLS

STREETLIGHT ZONES
DISTRICT 68-0240
DISTRICT 68 0240

ZONE APN ASSESSME
NT
2-F 169060005 144.43$
Volume 2
Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.C
PUBL

IC HEARING TO CONSIDER ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
NO. 22003 (ZCA22003) AMENDING THE JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING THE W -1 ZONE (SECTION

9.225.010) PERTAINING TO WATERCOURSE, WATERSHED AND

CONSERVATION AREAS
____________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing and introduce Ordinance No. 2022-12, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

AMENDING THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE W-1 ZONE (WATERCOURSE, WATERSHED AND CONSERVATION
AREAS) AND PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE W -1 ZONE, AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE

CEQA GUIDELINESBACKGROUND
Adoption of the General Plan
. On September 17, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 General Plan and initiated changes to the zoning map. The adoption included 21 land use amendments (LUAs) to the General Plan Land Use Map that added commercial and residential uses and buffered residential development from industrial uses. By law, a City’s zoning must be consistent with its General Plan. Many of the adopted LUAs resulted in making the existing zoning on the affected properties inconsistent with the General Plan land use designation. Upon General Plan adoption, the Council acknowledged that a zoning implementation program would be needed to evaluate the appropriate zoning of the Land Use Amendments (LUAs). The City completed its rezoning efforts for the LUAs on March 17, 2022.

Zoning Implementation Program . The last rezone, LUA #13 and 18, pertained to changing the zoning of property located adjacent to the Santa Ana River (east of Crest Steel) and at the southeast intersection of Jurupa Road and Van Buren Boulevard from

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

M-H (Manufacturing Heavy) and M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial) zoning to W- 1 (Watercourse, Watershed and Conservation Areas) zone. This was done in an effort to provide consistency between the General Plan Land Use Designation of Open Space - Conservation to a zone that would protect these areas from potentially harmful uses.

Concerns with the W -1 Zone. During the review of the rezone, it became apparent that some of the permitted uses in the W -1 zone could be harmful to natural resources. In addition, the W -1 zone included verbiage that described the intent of the zone as a temporary zone until development plans could be solidified at a future time. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council either (1) develop a new zone or (2) amend the W-1 zone to remove the uses considered inappropriate for land within federally protected floodplains and/or contiguous to significant watercourses and to remove references to the zone being temporary.

The City Council approved the last rezone of the Zoning Implementation Program and provided direction to amend the uses allowed in the W-1 zone as well as to eliminate the “temporary” intent of the zone.

On June 8, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and voted 4-0-1 to recommend that the City Council approve of Zoning Code Amendment No. 22003.

ANALYSIS
In accordance with the General Plan, the Open Space – Conservation land use designation is applied to land designated for light agricultural activities (where appropriate), preservation of non- Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) lands, protection from natural hazards, conservation of prime farmland and existing productive agricultural land, and preservation of scenic and other natural resources…” Importantly, the W-1 zone currently allows the following uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit, which have the potential to be very disruptive to W -1 zoned land. A few examples of these uses are as follows:
• Airports and heliports
• Mining Operations
• Oil Drilling
• RV Parks
• Sports fields
• Racing and competition events, other than between humans.

Since these uses are not consistent with the vision of Open Space - Conservation, it is recommended that they be removed from the code.

The proposed ordinance, if adopted, will allow the following uses without any discretionary review including three new uses:

12774-0001\2655804v1.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-12

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE W -1 ZONE
(WATERCOURSE, WATERS HED AND CONSERVATION
AREAS) AND PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE W-1 ZONE,

AND FINDING AN EXEMPTION FROM CEQA UNDER
SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN A S FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project Procedural Findings . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) At the March 17, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council initiated an amendment to Chapter 9.225 (“W-1 Zone (Watercourse, Watershed and Conservation Areas”) of Title 9 (“Planning and Zoning”) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, to amend the W-1 Zone and the permitted uses within the W -1 Zone (ZCA No. 22003) (the “ Zoning Code Amendment”), and requested that the Pla nning Commission study and report on the proposed Zoning Code Amendment, as set forth in this Ordinance.
(b) On June 8, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a public hearing on the proposed Zoning Code Amendment set forth in this Ordinance, at which time all persons interested in the proposed Zoning Code Amendment had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters . F ollowing t he receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimon y, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-06-08-01 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Zoning Code Amendment.
(c) On July 7, 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Zoning Code Amendment , at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on thes e matters.

Following the receipt of public testimony the City Council closed the public hearing and duly considered the written and oral testimony received.
(d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Zoning Code Amendment, amending uses permitted within the W-1 Zone, will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment is an administrative process of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. The City Council has reviewed the administrative record concerning the proposed Zoning Code Amendment -2-
12774-0001\2655804v1.doc
and the proposed CEQA determinations, and based on its own independent judgment, finds that the Zoning Code Amendment set forth in this Ordinance is not subject to, or exempt from, the requirements of the CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Section 3. Project Findings. The City Council hereby finds, as required by the Jurupa Valley Ordinances and applicable state law , that the proposed Zoning Code Amendment should be adopted because the proposed Zoning Code Amendment is consistent with the City of Jurupa Valley 2017 General Plan in that:
(a) Without the proposed changes, the W -1 zoning provisions have the potential to cause damage to the community’s natural open space resources. In addition, the zone as written, could result in the loss of property and harm to the public due to flooding. (b) There are currently inconsistencies between the General Plan and the Zoning Code. The ordinance addresses these inconsistencies and amends the Zoning Code so that the W-1 zone is consistent with the land use designation of Open Space-Conservation set forth in the General Plan.

Section 4. Amendment to Chapter 9.225. Chapter 9.225, W-1 Zone (Watercourse, Watershed and Conservations Areas) of Title 9, Planning and Zoning, of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“CHAPTER 9.225. - W-1 ZONE (WATERCOURSE, WATERSHED AND

CONSERVATION AREAS)
Sec. 9.225.010. - W-1 Zone (watercourse area) statement of policy.

There are some areas of the city which under present conditions are not suited for permanent occupancy or residency by persons for the reason that they are subjectdue to periodic flooding and other hazards. As a result of periodic flooding and other hazard s, the W-1 zone classification is intended to provide areas that maintain and protect the community’s natural open space resources.

The provisions of this chapter are temporary in nature, awaiting detailed plans of development for the lands and areas so classified. The regulations of this chapter shall apply to la nds so classified until either:
(1) A drainage and storm water control plan approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council shall have been carried out and put into effect; or (2) The lan ds have been subdivided and a final subdivision map placed on record in accordance with the applicable state and city regulations, including approval by the Planning Commission and City Council.

In either of these two (2) instances, the property may therea fter be reclassified into any other zone pursuant to regular zoning procedure.

Sec. 9.225.020. - Uses permitted.

A. The following uses are permitted in the W-1 Zone:
-3-
12774-0001\2655804v1.doc
(1) Field, tree and bush crops; flower and herb gardeningApiaries. (2) ApiariesNatural water recharge, percolation and watersheds. (3) The grazing only, of cattle, horses, sheep and goats and similar livestock, subject to the restrictions as to the number of animals per acre set forth in Section 9.175.020(A) (3)Wildlife preserves and sanctuaries.
(4) Golf courses, not including the construction of buildings. (4) Aquaculture.
(5) Water works facilities, both public and private intended primarily for the production and distribution of water for agricultural purposes.
(5) Hiking and equestrian trails.
(6) Scientific study/field work.
(7) Vistas and viewpoints.
(6) Utilities, both public and private.
(7) Aquaculture.

B. The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted:
(1) Airports and heliports.
(2) Any mining operation which is exempt from the provisions of the California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (Pub. Resources Code Section 2710 et seq.) and Chapter 5.65.
(3) Exploratory oil drilling, producing oil wells, oil storage tanks and appu rtenant facilities, but not including refineries.
(4) Racing and competition events other than between humans. (5) Hunting clubs, skeet, trap, rifle and pistol ranges. (6) Recreational vehicle parks.
(7) Tennis, badminton, volleyball, squash, lacrosse, han dball, baseball, racquetball and football, courts and sport recreational fields and uses. (8) Buildings and structures in conjunction with any use that is permitted under subsection (A) of this section.
-4-
12774-0001\2655804v1.doc
C. The following uses are permitted upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 9.240.330:
(1) Signs, on -site advertising , unless previously approved as a part of a granted conditional use permit.
(2) Meteorological towers.
(3) Water works facilities, both public and private intended primarily for the production and distribution of water for agricultural purposes.
(4) Utilities, both public and private.

D. The following uses are permitted provided that the operator thereof holds a permit to conduct surface mining operations issued pursuant to Chapter 5.65, which has not been revoked or suspended: Any mining operation that is subject to the California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (Pub. Resources Code Section 2710 et seq.).

E. Commercial WECS and WECS arrays with no limit as to rated power output are permitted, provided a commercial WECS permit has been granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.420.”
Section 5. Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Counc il hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.

Section 6. Effect of Ordinance . Thi s Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside adopted by reference by the City of Jurupa Valley in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance.

Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall ce rtify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.

PASSED, APPROVED , AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 21st day of July, 2022.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
-5-
12774-0001\2655804v1.doc
ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-12 was duly introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of July, 2022, and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of July, 2022, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 21st day of July, 2022.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.A
PRE
SENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023

CITY WORK PLAN
RECO

MMENDATION
That
the City Council receive and file the City of Jurupa Valley’s Work Plan for the 2022- 2023 Fiscal Year.

BAC

KGROUND
A
t the direction of the City Manager, staff has developed the City’s first Work Plan. In conjunction with the City Council adopted Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget, the Work Plan will serve as the “blueprint” for staff efforts during the upcoming Fiscal Year. The Work Plan is an annual operational document, organized by City Departments, that provides the City Council, public, service delivery partners, regional agencies and staff with a “one stop” overview of the City’s proposed tasks, projects and programs for the year. It is expected that the Plan will act as a “living” and evolving document that will continue to change over the course of the Fiscal Year. At the same time, the Work Plan is intended to serve as a guiding document for the established short term priorities, measurable key performance indicators, staff performance and transparency.

ANAL
YSIS
The W
ork Plan is intended to:
• Serve as a performance measurement and accountability tool for the City Council, Public and Staff.
• Communicate work product priorities for the upcoming year. • Demonstrate the organizations commitment to continuous improvement. • Inventory workload beyond “day to day” responsibilities.

The at
tached Work Plan is organized by City Department and will be utilized as part of the annual performance measurement process for each Department Executive. The

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 3

ATTACHMENTS

1. City of Jurupa Valley Work Plan
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target Completion
Date Status
1 Present a Solar Plan review, in-house training class (8 hours) to the Building Division staff Building 12/31/2022
2 Cross train all Permit Technicians to perform minor residential inspections Building 6/30/2023
3 Cross train 3 of the Building Inspectors to perform minor Public Works inspections Building 6/30/2023
4 Present a Swimming Pool Safety seminar for local Pool Contractors and staff Building 6/30/2023
5 Present Accela training to the Public Works Dept. and Dev. Services Dept. regarding deposit tracking and custom report writing. Building 12/31/2022 6 Complete configuration of Accela to process online payments for Building Permits Building 8/1/2022
7 Complete configuration of Accela to perform Electronic Plan check within Accela Building 8/1/2022
8 Develop training material and train Building Department Staff on Electronic Plan Check and Approvals Building 8/1/2022 9 Implement new fee structure into Accela ( after fee study completion and approvals Building 2/20/2023
10 Prepare staff report and ordinance language for adoption of the 2022 California Building Standards Codes Building 10/1/2022
11 Research and implement electronic signature software with template and text functions Building 3/20/2023
12 Implement Laser fiche archiving integration with Accela Building 4/20/2023 13 Prepare and Train staff on Updates to the newly adopted 2022 CA Building Codes Building 5/1/2023
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Building and Safety
2 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Building and Safety
14 Update Valuation Tables and Train Staff on proper method for determining project valuations Building 1/20/2023
15 Attend CALBO Training Building 6/30/2023
16 Submit the application for the CACEO Code Enforcement Dept. of the Year Award Code 8/30/2022
17 Ensure that 4 of the 7 Code Enforcement Officers obtain the ICC Residential Building Inspection certification Code 6/30/2023 18 Submit the application for Code Enforcement Officer of the Year for Irwin Salas Code 8/30/2022
19 Ensure that 4 of the 7 Code Enforcement Officers obtain the ICC Property Maintenance Inspector certification Code 6/30/2023 20 Ensure that 4 of the 7 Code Enforcement Officers obtain the ICC Zoning Inspector certification Code 6/30/2023
21 Ensure that all 7 code enforcement officers are CACEO certified Code 6/30/2023 22 Schedule code staff to attend CACEO training Code 6/30/2023 23 Integrate the Data Ticket system with the GoGovApps system Code 6/30/2023 24 Cross train at least 2 code officers to perform minor residential inspections Code 6/30/2023
25 Request reimbursement for city cost from Abandoned Vehicle Abatement program Code 6/30/2023
3 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
26 Implement a paperless Campaign Finance E-Filer application that will automate and validate financial campaign reports and provide a public viewing portal to allow the general public to view filing activity online.

City Clerk 7/1/2022
27 Convert the current part-time deputy city clerk position to a full-time position to address increased workload, provide
continuity,succession planning, and automate agenda process.

City Clerk 7/1/2022
28 Implement a paperless Form 700 Administration application to efficiently pre-notify annual filing deadlines and validate each required filing. Create a new repository for updates to the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and provide a public access portal where all Form 700’s can be viewed online.

City Clerk 7/1/2022
29 Expand the department’s records management division by providing support and training to city staff. City Clerk 7/1/2022 30 Coordinate the 2022 General Municipal Election for City Council Districts 1, 3, and 5, while ensuring all local, state, and federal laws are followed to ensure a fair and open election.

City Clerk 7/1/2022
31 Implement a City Council technology upgrade for agenda meeting management and technological upgrades. City Clerk 8/1/2022 32 Coordinate the construction of an archives center at the JVOC with climate controls and fire suppression capable of serving as a repository for the City’s permanent records.

City Clerk 2/1/2023
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program 2022-2023
Department - City Clerk
4 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program 2022-2023
Department - City Clerk
33 Work with the City Attorney to implement a lottery system for applicants who meet certain criteria to operate a retail dispensary in accordance with the voters' approval of Measure L in November, 2018.

City Clerk 4/1/2023
34 Continually improve operational processes to ensure excellence and efficiency. City Clerk Ongoing
35 Continue to comply with all legal mandates at the local, state, and federal levels to ensure open meetings, the integrity of the Political Reform Act; and compliance with the California Public Records Act.

City Clerk Ongoing
36 Continue to provide services in an open and transparent manner; continue to have cooperative working relationships with internal and external customers and continue to provide services in an expedited and courteous manner.

City Clerk Ongoing
5 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
37 Organize and execute special events (i.e. community cleanups, mobile vaccination clinics, blood drives, State of the City, Veterans Celebration Parade, Tree Lighting Ceremony)
Special Events Ongoing
38 Create and maintain an ADA-compliant website Communications Ongoing 39 Redesign official website to streamline service delivery, boost community engagement, improve public perception, and serve as the primary information source
Marketing/Communications 6/30/2023
40 Assist with interdepartmental communications to distribute transparent and timely information through webpages and e- newsletters
Communications Ongoing
41 Transition and publicize service-request platform, GoGovCommunications Ongoing 42 Improve community outreach communications through integration and/or enhancement of e-mail subscription management systemCommunications 7/30/2022 43 Establish and launch social-media marketing campaign to boost awareness, engagement, and following Marketing/Communications Ongoing 44 Develop social media strategic plan and social media policy Marketing/Communications 7/30/2022 45 Plan, design, and organize marketing in print and online to enhance the City's image and communicate city-related services, projects, and actions (i.e. badges, Budget in Brief, Community Profile, Council Goals, SOTC handouts, Legislation Platform…
Marketing/Communications Ongoing
46 Establish Strategic Communications, Marketing, and Civic Engagement Plan
Marketing/Communications/
Special Events 7/30/2022
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program FY 2022-2023
Department: City Manager's Department
6 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program FY 2022-2023
Department: City Manager's Department
47 Identify citywide locations to install permanent poles for marketing materials
Marketing/Communications/
Special Events 7/30/2022
48 Develop citywide branding standards Marketing 6/30/2023 49 Jurupa Valley Grade Separation Project - Outreach to impacted business and establish rapport, link businesses to Riverside County resources as well as connect them to JV's LEAP program. Maintain ongoing communication and schedule regular check in meetings with all area business owners
Economic Dev. 3/31/2023
50 Establish monthly events/workshops - promote small business participation, provide informative and educational presentations to assist in business retention strategies
Economic Dev. Ongoing
51 LEAP Program Outreach- Collaborate with consultant to disperse small business grant funds Economic Dev. 4/30/2023
52 AguaMansa Workforce Development - work with developer to target and prioritize recruitment of JV residents for 2,000-3,000 jobs
Economic Dev. 3/31/2023
53 Rubidoux Commerce Park - Work with Matt Englhart on proposed community garden project - Tour Huerta Del Valle Economic Dev. 1/31/2023 54 State of the City - Assist the Chamber of Commerce in the development of the State of the City presentation for the business luncheon
Economic
Dev./Marketing/Special
Events
2/28/2023
55 City parcel inventory - Catalog all existing city-owned parcels Economic Dev. 9/30/2022 56 ICSC - Assist with event registration, identify/schedule key developer meetings Economic Dev. 5/1/2023
57 Mayor's Visits - Develop Mayor's Business Visitation Program Economic Dev. Ongoing 58 Develop Retention Program for "Top" Businesses Economic Dev. 9/30/2022 7 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program FY 2022-2023
Department: City Manager's Department
59 Business Recruitment Strategy - Research vacant small business sites - attracting new businesses to the city Economic Dev. TBD 60 Mexican Consulate - Create program with Mexican Consulate Economic Dev.4/30/2023 61 68th Street Property - Develop plan for property Economic Dev. 3/31/2023 62 City Logo- Create logo and ID for Economic DevelopmentEconomic Dev. TBD 63 Broadband Plan - Research communities programs Economic Dev. TBD 64 Develop Emergency Operations Plan Emergency Services12/31/2022 65 Prepare an emergency needs assessment for both buildings for supplies, water, etc. Emergency Services 6/30/2023
66 Conduct 2 Trainings (EOC) - tabletop, functional, earthquake evacuation and Intruder Webinar Emergency Services Ongoing 67 SEMS/NIMS certification of staff IS 100, 200 & 700 Emergency Services Annually 68 CPR/FirstAid Training Emergency Services 9/1/2022
69 EOC Coordinator Consultant Position from Riverside County EMD Emergency Services 7/1/2022 70 Develop plan for EOC buildout for the new JVOC - Emergency Services 12/1/2022 71 Develop plan for EOC backup - City Hall Emergency Services12/22/2022 72 Submit earmark requests - Monitor and submit as appropriateLegislation 4/30/2023 73 Facilitate Legilative Tour in Sacramento Legislation 1/30/2023 74 Explore options for Council consideration fo a Federal Lobbiest Legislation 9/30/2022 75 Analize report and distribute legislative updates to staff and council LegislationOngoing 76 Prepare a legislative information page for website and collect info. for sharing on social media Legislation Ongoing
77 Hire grant writing support staff Grants 9/1/2022
78 Track grant opportunities Grants Ongoing
79 Coordinate Food Pantry operations ACM 7/30/2022
8 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program FY 2022-2023
Department: City Manager's Department
80 Develop Strategic Plan for the American Recovery Plan Act Funding ACM 7/30/2022 81 Continue to Manage the Study of the Hybrid Policing Model ACM 8/30/2022 82 Develop City Work Plans and performance measurement tool ACM 6/30/2022 83 Strategic Planning Process with Executives ACM 12/30/2022 84 Develop long-term comprehensive strategy for Santa Ana River/Downey Park ACM 10/31/2022
85 Coordinate tenant improvements and internal office move ACM 11/30/2022 86 Coordinate with RCCD on development of IE Tech Center ACM Ongoing 87 Conduct energy efficiency study at city buildings ACM 11/30/2022 88 Develop Council Goal Setting Process ACM 9/30/2022
89 Begin strategic planning for long term Civic Center needs ACM 1/31/2023 90 Improve coordination and communication with JCSD, RCCD, RCSD,JARPD,JUSD, Library, Animal Control, County Parks ACM Ongoing 91 Identify priority areas for coordinated traffic and code enforcementACM 10/31/2023 92 Explore feasibility of Trauma Intervention Program ACM 7/30/2022 93 Community Development Block Grant 5 year Consolidation Action Plan ACM 3/30/2023
94 Local Economic Assistance Program ACM Ongoing
95 Community Grants ACM 5/31/2023
96 Improve regional network via CCCA and WRCOG ACM Ongoing 97 CDBG Annual Allocation Process ACM Ongoing
98 5 Year CDBG Consolidated Action Plan ACM 6/30/2023
9 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
99 Update Land Use and Zoning Maps CD On-Going
100 Provide Quarterly development updates on major projects on City website CD On-Going
101 Update Planning webpage once a month CD On-Going
102 Conduct 4 Planning Commission training workshops CD On-Going 103
Housing Element Implementation: Apply for grant to help increase opportunities for disabled persons in affordable residential units rehabilitated or constructed through City or County programs.

CD On-Going
104 Update Land Use and Zoning Maps CD On-Going
105 Code Amendment: Inclusionary Housing Ordinance CD 7/15/2022 106 Document Imaging of Planning Documents CD 7/30/2022 107 Develop Housing Checklists in accordance with HCD & State Housing laws CD 7/30/2022
108
General Plan: Revise Safety Element (SB99-Identify residential developments in recognized hazard areas without two
evacuation routes.

CD 8/1/2022
109 Major Project Review: Shops @ Jurupa Valley-Revised Permit for hotel at Bldg. 19, and other revised conditions on 30 acres.CD 8/1/2022 110 Major Project Review: Pre Application for 72,288 sft Industrial Spec Building on a 3.68 acres (Havana Investment Spec Building)CD 8/1/2022 111 Major Project Review: Add 9 Mobile homes to Old Plantation CD 8/1/2022 112 Code Amendment: Development Standards and Processing requirements for Gasoline Service Stations CD 8/1/2022
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
10 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
113
Housing Element Implementation Work - Change zoning in
certain areas identified in Housing Element to be consistent with General Plan
CD 9/1/2022
114 Implement Community Development Fee Study CD 9/1/2022 115 Implement in house GIS and maintenance of system CD 9/3/2022 116 Complete and Implement Community Facilities District Fee Study
CD 9/30/2022
117
Code Amendment Part II: Comprehensive Revision of Alcoholic Beverage Sales regulation - Designate appropriate zones to allow distilleries, wineries, and breweries
CD 9/30/2022
118 2017 General Plan Final Document CD 10/1/2022
119 Develop Design Guidelines - Gas Station CD 10/1/2022 120 Community Benefit Permit: Amend the 45-day requirement for a hearing CD 10/1/2022
121 Major Project Review: Saddlehorn Ranch 32 lot subdivision for single fmaily homes on 19.42 acres. CD 10/1/2022
122 Major Project Review: Century Communities: Emerald Ridge South CD 10/1/2022
123
Create General Plan consistency with Zoning for shopping centers and business parks (e.g. center on (1) Jurupa & Van Buren (MSC & BP); (2) De Anza)
CD 10/31/2022
124 Create and implement SB330 Application Fee CD 10/31/2022 125
Code Amendment: Revisions to Detached Accessory structure and include a definition of detached accessory structure and add architecture review (consider noticing)
CD 11/1/2022
11 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
126 Code Amendment: Family Daycare Homes CD 11/1/2022
127
Code Amendment: Revise Sec. 9.245.040. - On-site advertising structures and signs to include a maximum percentage of window signage and possibly include a definition CD 11/1/2022 128
Housing Element Implementation: Develop Accessory Dweling Unit informational materials, user guide, and 'Permit Ready' sample plans.

CD 11/30/2022
129 "Small home lot development" - create process, policies, and possibly code amendment CD 12/1/2022
130 Major Project Review: Century Communities- Paradise Knolls PA 2 CD 12/28/2022
131
Major Project Review: Emerald Ridge North - Revision to TTM36947 and Amend development plan: For the purpose of extending “A” St. from existing CUL-DE-SAC terminus, Westerly to connect to La Canada Dr. Property is subdivided into 97 single- family residential lots and 118 townhome units, and include water quality basins, various recreational amenities, open space (including natural, graded, and community open space), as well as roadways and other supporting infrastructure on 42.68 acres.

CD 12/29/2022
132
Major Project Review: Rio Vista Specific Plan- 917 acres that consists of the following uses: 1,697 residential units, 1,428,768 sq. ft. business park, 1,269,774 sq. ft. light industrial park, 13.4 acre for an elementary school, and 572.6 acres of open space conservation and recreation.

CD 12/30/2022
12 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
133
Major Project Review: Rubidoux Commerce Park General Plan Amendment to modify Mira Loma Warehouse & Distribution
Overlay to allow a total of 1.3 million sq. ft. of logistics on 88.46 acres.

CD 12/30/2022
134
Major Project Review: Bellgrave Market Place - Pre Application for a 2,170 sq. ft. carniceria, cold storage 20k sq. ft., 3,600 sq. ft. feed store, 1,200 sq. ft. commercial kitchen, and fruit stand 2,100 sq. ft. office on 3.31 acres.

CD 12/30/2022
135
Major Project Review: Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. - New waste collection operations facility (office, shop building, truck parking empty bin storage, and alternative fuel facilities on 9.82 acres
CD 12/30/2022
136
Major Project Review: Mobile Modular - CUP for storage of shipping containers - refurbish to reuse and rent as offices on

3.31 acres
CD 12/30/2022
137 Major Project Review: Caterpillar Industrial Park CD 12/30/2022 138 Major Project Review: Hobbs - Las Palmas - TTM 37857 - 39 single-family lots on 3.84 acres CD 12/30/2022
139
Major Project Review: Madone Collection Residential (Camino Real) - Subdivision of 6.92 acres into 36 single-family units (includes 3 affordable units) (5.2 du/ac)
CD 12/30/2022
140
General Plan Implementation: Coduct a study of commercial truck movements and operations in the City and establish weight-restricted truck routes away from noise-sensitive areas.

CD 12/30/2022
13 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
141 Code Amendment: Adopt standards to address SB 9 CD 12/31/2022 142 Post map and Development Agreements on City website that identifies properties subject to DA CD 12/31/2022
143 Code Amendment Part II: Multi-family Development Standards revisions (parking analysis) CD 12/31/2022
144 General Plan - Master Plan for Pedley Town Center CD 12/31/2022 145
Code Amendment: Recycling Facilities (SDP in Commercial Zones & CUP in Industrial Zones; review required entitlement and standards as well)
CD 12/31/2022
146
Major Project Review: Mission Village Shopping Center - Development of a new Retail Commercial Shopping Center on

10.1 acres. Demolition of existing bldgs. on site to
accommodate eight (8) new ground up retail/commercial bldgs. and related site improvements for a new shopping center.

CD 12/31/2022
147
Major Project Review: O-Reilly Auto Parts Store - Construction of a new automobile parts supply store on 0.91 acres. NE Corner of Mission Blvd. and Agate
CD 12/31/2022
148
Housing Element Implementation: Affordable Housing
Development Review. Develop SB35 expedited review process guide and qualification checklist for the development of affordable housing units in the City for developers.

CD 12/31/2022
14 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
149
Major Project Review: District @ Jurupa Valley Specific Plan would permit development of up to 1,192 residential units; 3 million square feet of commercial and industrial land uses; a hotel with conference and hospitality area; and 7 acres of parks and open space.

CD 1/5/2023
150
Major Project Review: The Marketplace at Bellgrave -25,943 sq. ft. retail center with three tenants on 1.28 acres. Note: This is located east of Shops at Bellegrave
CD 1/15/2023
151
Major Project Review: Vernola Apartments – Phase B - Pre application for 200 (market-rate) apartment units on 8.3 acres of land
CD 1/15/2023
152
Major Project Review: Vernola Ranch - Pre-application for new residential community of approximately 1,576 single-family and multi-family homes on 153 acres.

CD 1/15/2023
153
Major Project Review: Paradise Knolls Planning Area 5- DR Horton - Subdivision of 31.59 acres into 217 single-family lots in Paradise Knolls SP site (PA-3 & PA-4) (6.9 du / ac). 220 sq. ft. subdivision within Paradise Knolls (Planning Area 5)
CD 2/15/2023
154 Major Project Review: New Plumbing Supply Store - Warehouse- 7,197 sq ft. on 0.56 acres - 3742 Riverview CD 2/25/2023 155
Code Amendment: Revise Sec. 9.240.340 - Findings and
procedure for revocation of variances and permits (change B & S Official to CDD and other recommended changes)
CD 3/1/2023
156 General Plan - Master Plan for Glen Avon Town Center CD 3/1/2023 15 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
157 Code Amendment: Mobile Vending - Revise Sec. 6.20 to consider standards CD 3/1/2023
158
Major Project Review: Limonite and Wineville- Diversified Communities - Pre-Application for Wineville Project proposing on a 33 acres; plan unit development for 263 Housing Units; 2 Commercial Centers
CD 3/1/2023
159 Major Project Review: SLRP, Inc. - For the subdivision of 162 acres into 54 parcels - Philadelphia Ave & East of Country VillageCD 3/1/2023 160
Major Project Review: Tractor Supply - Commercial center on

4.48 acres (Tractor Supply Center will be Phase 1 and two future drive-thru restaurants will be Phase 2). Potential restaurants can include Carl`s Jr., and Starbucks.

CD 3/1/2023
161 Implementation of the 5th Housing Element Housing Program - GPAs and CZs for 16 acres of land CD 3/4/2023
162
GeneralPlanImplementation:DevelopTownCenterStandards
and update the Zoning Ordinance to include them and to
integrate the Rubidoux Design Standards with the new
standards.

CD 3/20/2023
163 Repeal of the Agua Mansa Industrial Corridor Specific PlanCD 3/30/2023 164 Code Amendment: Part II: Add provisions for assessing the need for an emergency shelter and to establish "Low Barrier
Navigation Centers"
CD 4/1/2023
165 Code Amendment: Electric Fence Standards CD 4/1/2023 16 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
166
Major Project Review: Platinum Mini Storage- 88,898 sq. ft. mini storage facility on 4.73 acres in the MH zone and within half HI & BP land uses.

CD 4/20/2023
167 Major Project Review: Jurupa Valley Apartments @ Mission Blvd. - 72 town home style apartments on 4.70 acres CD 4/30/2023 168 North Pyrite Master Plan CD 4/30/2023
169 Housing Element Implementation: Review and update the Zoning Code to ensure that transitional, temporary and
permanent supportive housing and low barrier navigation CD 4/30/2023
170
Major Project Review: Nova Homes - 74-single-family lot subdivision on 25.07 acres North side of Limonite & East of Pedley Blvd.

CD 5/30/2023
171
Major Project Review: Limonite Medical Office Park- Medical park with commercial, office and restaurant uses on 19.99 acres. This includes a 247,650 sq. ft. medical and commercial center on 19 acres. Proposed commercial retail/medical offices development includes: Four 2-Story Medical Office Bldgs. (20,250 sq. ft. each); Four 2-Story Medical Office Bldgs. (38,000 sq. ft. each); Two Drive-thru restaurants (2,880 sq. ft. each); A one-story. 8,880 sq. ft. retail building; 247,640 sq. ft. overall bldg. area.

CD 5/30/2023
172 Repeal of the Mission de Anza Specific Plan CD 5/30/2023 173 Municipal Code Amendment: Density Bonus Law and Develop User Guide CD 6/1/2023
17 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
174 Code Amendment: Revise certain zones to include setbacks (ex.

Chapter 9.65 R-A to include setbacks) CD 6/1/2023
175 Code Amendment: Add an Airport Zone for Flabob AirportCD 6/1/2023 176 Code Amendment: Industrial & Residential Buffering / SetbacksCD 6/1/2023 177 Development Application Approvals and Timelines GuideCD 6/5/2023 178
Implement Senate Bill (SB) 10 Ordinance to zone any parcel for up to 10 units of residential density if the parcel is located in a transit-rich area, which includes areas near rail transit or bus routes with peak headways of 15 minutes or faster, or an urban infill site.

CD 6/6/2023
179
Major Project Review: KY Spices Manufacturing Facility - New 91,852 sq. ft. manufacturing facility for spices and canned foods on 4.78 acres.

CD 6/20/2023
180
Housing Element Implementation: Identify vacant and
underutilized properties as candidate sites for affordable or mixed market rate/affordable housing development and identify them in the Land Use Inventory.

CD 6/20/2023
181
GeneralPlanImplementation:AmendtheMunicipalCodeto
require that development entitlements comply with the Land Use/Noise Compatibility Matrix.

CD 6/20/2023
18 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
182
GeneralPlanImplementation:Developprofilesfor specific
industrial opportunity sites, including information on site attributes, allowed land use and development standards, relevant County or City approvals, and potential development incentives.

CD 6/20/2023
183
GeneralPlanImplementation:Beautificationof Commercial
Areas. Develop and adopt standards for the maintenance and beautification of commercial areas.

CD 6/20/2023
184 General Plan Implementation: Maintain up-to-date information regarding the location of mineral resource zones in the City.CD 6/20/2023 185
General Plan Implementation: Update City ordinances to require that all proposals for mineral extraction and reclamation be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council.

Maintain up to date information regarding the location of mineral resource zones in the City.

CD 6/20/2023
186
General Plan Implementation: Code Amendment to Implement Historic preservation initiatives and incentives, such as the Mills Act Tax Reduction program to encourage maintenance and
restoration of historic properties.

CD 6/20/2023
187 Activate 30 Opportunity Sites in the City CD 6/30/2023 188 Major Project Review: Retail Commercial Center - Paradise Knolls Planning Area 3 CD 6/30/2023
189 Major Project Review: Philadelphia Avenue Subdivision - 44 lot subdivision and 84.54 acres of open space CD 6/30/2023
19 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
190 Adopt Minor Revisions to the Municipal Code to clean up language CD 6/30/2023
191 General Plan - Master Plan for Rubidoux Village Town CenterCD 6/30/2023 192 Code Amendment: Modify Sec. 9.240.290.G.1 to allow separate conveyance of ADUs CD 6/30/2023
193 Code Amendment: Revise outdated Wireless
Telecommunication Facilities section CD 6/30/2023
194
Lighting Standards - Add lighting standards to address lights flooding onto adjacent properties as there are currently no standards for residential zones. Ensure this is addressed in all zones and include general provisions for lighting standards.

CD 6/30/2023
195
Code Amendment: Modify Extension of Time process for
TPM/TTM and other entitlements - Modify code to include a detailed process including required hearing(s)
CD 6/30/2023
196
Housing Element & General Plan Implementation: Establish and maintain a Land Use Inventory and a map that provide a
mechanism to monitor a) acreage and location by General Plan designation, b) vacant and underutilized land, and c) build-out of approved projects.

CD 6/30/2023
197
General Plan Implementation: Adopt Architectural Guidelines addressing site planning, building and landscape design, and signage. CD 6/30/2023
20 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion Status
Department: Community Development
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
198 General Plan Implementation: Adopt an Ordinance to maintain and protect landmark and historic trees throughout the City.CD 6/30/2023 21 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
199 Implement internal maintenance/service requests for facility improvements + work order tracking PW/Engineering 12/30/2022 200 Implement microsoft 365 suite for PW team - create sharepoint site, construction management/productivity tools PW/Engineering 9/30/2022 201 Continue recruitments for PW maintenance/engineering positions PW/Engineering On-going
202
Update website to improve information dissemination to the public. Update standards/procedures for engineering +
permitting, CIP projects, traffic, NPDES, maintenance information, PW/Engineering On-going
203 Proposed Public Works Committee - Review and recommend the structure and role/responsibilities of the current Traffic Safety PW/Engineering 9/30/2022 204 Streamline/develop working relationship with JCSD, RCSD, County Transportation, RCTC, WRCOG, Caltrans, and JARPD.PW/Engineering On-going 205 Ongoing reporting for SB1, Measure A, CDBG, ATP, HSIP and other funding sources PW/Engineering on-going
206 Complete transition from Waste Management to Burrtec, additional franchise fees PW/Engineering 9/30/2022
207 Implement Organic Waste Compliance Program per SB 1383 and negotiate service fees PW/Engineering 8/30/2022
208 Advertise RFPs and award contracts for the following on-call services: PW/Engineering 8/30/2022
209 Pavement Repair Services PW/Engineering9/30/2022
210 Citywide Tree Trimming PW/Engineering9/30/2022
211 Street Striping PW/Engineering 9/30/2022
212 Procure Landscape Service Truck and other City vehicles PW/Engineering 12/30/2022 City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program 2022-2023
Department - Engineering
22 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program 2022-2023
Department - Engineering
213 Establish Fleet Management Program (pool vehicles,
maintenance, fueling, etc) PW/Engineering 3/31/2023
214 Develop tree/landscape policy and guidelines PW/Engineering 3/31/2023 215 Plan and Begin City Hall Renovations + Facility Repairs PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 216 Collaborate with JCSD on open space/demostration garden on City property (beautification/stormwater treatment)PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 217 Continue responding to service requests and on-
going/maintenance operations PW/Engineering On-going
218 Develop and adopt an ADA Transition Plan to ensure compliance for federal projects PW/Engineering6/30/2023
219
Initiate update of GIS maps to include CIP projects,
hauling/sweeping routes, pavement moratorium, active
construction, and catch basins
PW/Engineering 6/30/2023
220 Continue to seek grant opportunities to fund future/unfunded PW/transporation projects PW/Engineering On-going
221 Update engineering standard drawings/specifications PW/Engineering 12/30/2022 222 Review/develop a billing structure for deposit based accounts for development/encroachment permits PW/Engineering 12/30/2022 223 Work with WRCOG to initiate Nexus Study to prioritize future TUMF projects for the zone PW/Engineering 6/30/2023
224 Review/Update ordinance for u-turn enforcement PW/Engineering 12/31/2022 225 Review/Update ordinance for truck restrictions PW/Engineering 12/31/2022 226 Udate/review Street Master Plan PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 23 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program 2022-2023
Department - Engineering
227 Update/Review Street Pavement Management ProgramPW/Engineering6/30/2023 228 Coordinate Golden West Pump Station Upgrades with RCSDPW/EngineeringOn-going 229 Advertise RFPs and award contracts for the following on-call services: PW/Engineering
230 Review and update storm water compliance/MS4 permit and inspection program PW/Engineering Ongoing
231 Develop plan and install full capture systems PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 232 Review and update 5 year Capital Improvement Project Program PW/Engineering Ongoing 233 Design current/future CIP Projects (RFPs, complete design, obtain clearances, prepare for construction) PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 234 Mission Blvd. Pvmt. Rehab. - Ph. 2 (21103) PW/Engineering9/30/2022 235 21/22 Citywide Pvmt. Rehab. (21101) PW/Engineering 9/30/2022 236 Van Buren Blvd. Widening (17-B.1) PW/Engineering 12/31/2022 237 Citywide Guardrail Replacement (19112) PW/Engineering 12/31/2022 238 21/22 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades (21104) PW/Engineering12/31/2022 239 21/22 Misc. Drainage Repairs (21105) PW/Engineering 12/31/2022 240 Pacific Avenue Street Improvements Project - CDBG PW/Engineering6/30/2023 241 Bellegrave Ave. Widening (21107) - Planning/Design Only PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 242 Riverside Dr. Widening (21108) PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 243 HSIP Citywide Traffic Signal Coord. and Safety Upgrades (21112) PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 244 Mission Blvd. Pvmt. Rehab. - Ph. 3 (21110) PW/Engineering 12/31/2022 245 Van Buren Blvd. Pvmt. Rehab. - Ph. 3 (21111) PW/Engineering 3/31/2023 24 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program 2022-2023
Department - Engineering
246 Mission Blvd. Street Improvements (21113) - Pyrite to 1500' east PW/Engineering6/30/2023 247 Market Street Bridge PW/Engineering 6/30/2023
248 Mission Blvd. Bridge PW/Engineering 6/30/2023
249 Limonite Ave. widening, Bain to Homestead PW/Engineering6/30/2023 250 Rubidoux Blvd. and SR60 Interchange Improvements - PAED Phase PW/Engineeringon-going
251 Jurupa Rd Grade Separation Project PW/Engineering 6/30/2023 252
Review/Processing/Inspection for current/future Development Projects during entitlement, map recordation, LLMD/CFD
formation/annexation, plan review, permits, construction, acceptance. Some major projects include, but not limited to:

PW/Engineering on-going
253
Rio Vista Specific Plan, Paradise Knolls, District at JV, Shops at JV, Vernola Marketplace Ph2, Vernola Ranch, Emerald Ridge North, Emerald Ridge South, Hudson Subdivision, Montecito, Space Center, Agua Mansa Commerce Park, Appalloosa Springs, Van Buren Marketplace, Las Palmas, and various others
PW/Engineeringon-going
254 On-going inspection + review of encroachment permits - processed 800 EPs in 2021 PW/Engineering on-going
255 Coordinate + Inpsect SCE RTRP Project PW/Engineering on-going 256 Coordinate + Inpsect JCSD/RCSD water/sewer CIP Projects PW/Engineering on-going 257 Coordinate with Riverside County Flood Control District - Trash Capture Device installation (RIVCO Funds) PW/Engineering on-going 25 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program 2022-2023
Department - Engineering
258 Coordinate with Riverside County Flood Control District - 5 year storm CIP PW/Engineering on-going
259 Coordinate with Riverside County Flood Control District - Pyrite Area MDP Update PW/Engineering on-going
260 Coordinate with Riverside County Flood Control District on Army Corp of Engineers - Santa Ana River Levy Project PW/Engineering on-going 26 Item
Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
261
Implementationof permittingsoftware,Accela,for Planning,Buildingand Engineering Departments through the ACA process and implement online payments
Finance 7/31/2022
262 Lease Back followup with City Hall callateral used for JVOC Finance/CM 7/31/2022 263 Develop the format for a New Quarterly Budget/Finance Overview to be presented to City Council as a Quarterly Information Item - Consent CalendarFinance 9/30/2022 264 Update City investment policy Finance 9/30/2022
265 Complete Billing and audit files for the Dept. of Justice COVID-19 grantFinance 12/31/2022 266 UpdateTyler/Edenfinancialsoftwaretouptodateversionsafteryearendclosing (explore cloud based options) Finance 12/31/2022
267 Evaluate procedures related to federal grants funding that include risk assessment and evaluation over reporting and compliance Finance 12/31/2022 268 Work with departments to complete the permitting software, Accela, for deposit and balance reporting Finance 12/31/2022
269
Ensure successful timely completion of annual internal and external audits that result in audit reports containing no instances of material internal control weaknesses and unqualified auditor opinion for annual audit Finance 12/31/2022
270 Create Investment Committee Finance 12/31/2022
271 ImplementnewinvestmentstrategyforidlecashtobroadenCityhorizonsbeyond LAIF Finance 4/30/2023
272 Work with Building Department to close out ALL old building permits issued before 08/2019 Finance 4/30/2023
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Administrative Services - Finance
27 Item
Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Administrative Services - Finance
273 Continue to train and cross train employees to ensure excellent service and support to all city departments, vendors and residents
All Admin
Svcs Div Ongoing
274 Review department-wide business processes to improve efficiency and internal controls and develop a cohesive Finance Department procedures manualFinance 3/31/2023 275 Identify strategies to expand cost allocation and reduce charges to General Fund Finance 3/31/2023 276 Finalize the implementation process utilizing Accela reports to balance with City financialsFinance 6/30/2023 277 New Financial system software - phase 1 RFP process Finance 6/30/2023 278 Develop project timeline to produce the City's first multi-year Financial Plan Finance 6/30/2023 279 Work with City Department to develop an asset inventory and ultimately a replacement schedule and asset replacement fund
Finance and
Purchasing6/30/2023
28 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
280 Complete an Employee Benefit Survey for Recruiting and Retaining Quality Employees HR/Risk 7/1/2022
281 Conduct a City Wide Total Class and Compensation Study and Develop a Compensation Plan Document HR/Risk 7/1/2022
282 Createupdatedsafetytrainingcalendarforall employeesfromJuly 2022 to June 2023. HR/Risk 9/1/2022
283 PreparefortheKickOffof OpenEnrollment2023includingvirtual health fair and benefit meetings. HR/Risk 10/1/2022
284 Update 125 Cafeteria Plan Document and review current Benefit Plan. HR/Risk10/1/2022 285 Developan ADATransitionPlanin coodinationwithPublicWorks Department HR/Risk 12/1/2022
286 Implement a HRIS Program to track and maintain employee's records and activities including work and salary history HR/Risk 12/1/2022 287 Market Long and Short Term Disability Programs vs. EDD CostHR/Risk 1/1/2023 288 Complete an Ergonomic Study of each department/staff needsHR/Risk 2/7/2023 289 CreateanInternshipProgramtoassistwithspecialprojectswithinthe City HR/Risk 6/30/2023
290 Continue to evaluate and transition contract employees to City staff. HR/Risk 6/30/2023 291 Purchaseandimplementa customerappformainlobbytocheckin guest, visitors, customers, and employees with QR Code. HR/Risk 6/30/2023 292 Implement the DOJ Fingerprint Process, employee ID program and E- Verification for the I-9 Immigration verification program. HR/Risk 6/30/2023 City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program FY 2022-2023
Department - Human Resources
29 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program FY 2022-2023
Department - Human Resources
293 CollaboratewithPublicWorksto updatetheVehicleMaintenance Program to track vehicles/trucks to maintenance schedule. HR/Risk 6/30/2023 30 Item Action Summary Division/Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program FY 2022-2023
Department - Human Resources
294 Developa RiskManagementManual/Planandtrainingsupervisorand managers on reducing risk liability. HR/Risk 6/30/2023
295 Transition Risk and Workers' Compensation Program from PERMA to HR/Risk 7/1/2023 296 Coordinate Annual Service Award HR/Risk Annually
297 ContinuetoupdateCityemployeesandmanagersonchangesinState and Federal Employment Laws. HR/Risk on-going
298 Conduct annual review and update Personnel Policies and ProceduresHR/Risk on-going 299 Develop a Supervisor/Manager Orientation Training ProgramHR/Risk 6/30/2023 300 Recruit and hire City staff as approved by Council. HR/Risk on-going 301 Coordinate and Maintain COVID-19 New Laws and RegulationsHR/Risk on-going 302 Conduct and Monitor Risk Management Controls for i.e. Liability Claims:

Trees , Sidewalk, & Employment Best Practices HR/Risk on-going 303 Coodinate Quarterly Safety Committee Meetings HR/Risk Quarterly 304 Coordinate Quarterly All Employee Meetings for City ManagerHR/Risk Quarterly 31 Item
Action Summary Division/ Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
305 Implement Shared Cloud solution (Dropbox, Office 365/Sharepoint) on department basis, or CityWide IT 7/1/2022
306 Upgrading User PCs - ALL users IT 7/1/2022
307 Technology access for redesign of City Hall Conf Rooms, cubes, offices IT 6/30/2023 308 Implement IT Policies for the City IT 6/30/2023
309 Install and rewire network rack IT 6/30/2023
310 Cybersecurity Best Pracitices and Impletmentation Training IT 6/30/2023 311 Server, Network Hardware upgrade/ replacement IT 7/31/2022 312 Accela - Training, expand to employees IT 12/1/2022 313 HDL Prime End of Life, Integrate Business registrations into Accela IT 6/30/2023 314 Work with Management Office/ Devyn to migrate web services from Civic Plus to Granicus
IT /
Management6/30/2023
315 Implement GoGov Ecitizen - Mobile App IT, Multiple
Departments12/1/2022
316 SmartSheet Application implementation for Public Works projectsIT/Public Works 12/1/2022
317 Create work at home, VPN access IT 6/30/2023
318 Conference Room renovation IT PW 7/1/2022
319 Training Room setup IT PW 7/1/2022
320 EOC Emergency Operations Center technology setup IT / Depts. 12/1/2022 City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Administrative Services - IT
32 Item
Action Summary Division/ Unit
Target
Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Administrative Services - IT
321 Setup Wife/ network for Charging station in Parking lot IT/PW 12/1/2022 322 Direct Circuit between City Hall and JVOC IT / 3rd party 6/30/2023 33 Item
Action Summary Division/Unit
Target Completion
Date Status
323 Utilize Leverage Purchasing Agreements by joining National Purchasing Consortiums
Admin/Fin/
Purchasing Ongoing
324 Review Bid documents and update language as well as review insurance liability to be compliant with current recommended amounts for fiscal year 2022-2023 Admin/Fin
Svc/Purchasing &
PW
7/1/2022
325 Introduce Micropurchasing strategy for federal funds Purchasing 12/31/2022 326 Work with Accounts Payable to establish procedures "from Req to Check" Admin/ Fin Svc 10/6/2022 327 Consolidate contract services to receive government discounts - such as CALNET/First Responder - AT&T
Admin Fin
Services/IT 7/1/2022
328 Tracking of purchases, receiving, vendor returns, warranty information Purchasing 9/30/2023 329 Establish procedures and tracking for Equipment and Fleet InventoryPurchasing/ Public Works 12/31/2022
330 Establish Equipment Surplus procedures Admin/Fin/
Purch/PW 8/17/2022
331 City Hall 1st Floor remodel project; procurement of furniture, equipment, supplies and services Purchasing/ Building Ongoing
332 Data analysis of all utility accounts for all City owned sites for service/account consolidation and costs savings. Example SCE
Fin/IT/AP/
Purchasing 12/31/2022
333 Begin data analysis for RFP requirements for purchase, Implementation and Deployment of Integrated Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Admin/Fin/IT/HR/
PW/Eng Ongoing
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Administrative Services - Purchasing
34 Item
Action Summary Division/Unit
Target Completion
Date Status
City of Jurupa Valley
Work Program: FY 2022- 2023
Department: Administrative Services - Purchasing
334
Assist with New Financial System - Upgrade & Implementation to ensure system includes Purchasing module the integrates bids, RFPs, requisition, purchase orders and receiving.

Admin/Fin/PW 6/30/2023
35 Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DAT
E: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.B
CI
TY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS FOR THE 20 22

GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
RECO

MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-71,entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CALLING A GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, FOR

THE ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL BY DISTRICTS 1, 3, AND 5 AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES

AND THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE
2) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-72, entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES

FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE STATEMENTS

SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022
BAC
KGROUND:

A
t their August 3, 2017 meeting, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2017- 12, providing for the election of the City Council by districts. Districts 2 and 4 held elections in November 2020. Districts 1, 3, and 5 will hold elections in November 2022.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS

The City of Jurupa Valley will conduct a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, to elect three (3) members of the City Council from Districts 1, 3, and 5 with the incumbents being Lorena Barajas Bisbee, Brian Berkson, and Chris Barajas.

The procedures for conducting a General Municipal Election are established by state law.

Pursuant to these requirements, the City Council is being asked to consider two resolutions. Resolution No. 202 2-71 gives notice of the election of officers, authoriz es the City Clerk to do all things necessary to conduct the el ection, and requests services from the County of Riverside to assist i n conducting and canvassing the election.

Resolution No. 202 2-72, adopts regulations pertainin g to materials prepared by any candidate for the municipal election, including costs of the candidate’s statement.

OTHER INFORMATION
The City consolidates with the Riverside County Registrar of Voters which conducts the election, tallies the results, and s upplies the City with certified election results. The County then bills the City for its pro- rata share of the costs. The costs for printing the candidates' statement in the sample ballot are recovered from the candidates. A candidate’s statement is optional. If a candidate decides to submit a candidate's statement, a deposit is required when the candidate submits his/her nomination papers.

If the actual printing costs are less than the deposited amount, the balance is refunded to each candidate. Should the cost be more, the candidate is billed for the additional amount.

In order to ensure cost recovery for any candidate's statements, the Registrar of Voters will propose a deposit based on the number of candidates. There is no filing fee.

The resolutions are required to initiate this year's election process and must be adopted and submitted to the County for consolidation by August 12, 2022. The nomination period for the election is July 18 through August 12. Should any of the incumbents choose not to run for re-election, the nomination period for that particular office will be extended an additional five days to August 17 , 2022, when candidates, other than incumbents, may file.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Every registered California voter will get a ballot mailed to them in future elections under AB 37, which was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 21, 2021. The law makes permanent a change adopted during the pandemic for the 2020 Election.

Sufficient funds to cover the cost of the election have been included in the 202 2-23 Budget. It is anticipated that the election will cost approximately $100,000. Funds for publication of Candidate's Statements of Qualifications will be paid by the candidates.

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-71

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CALLING A GENERAL

MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 8, 2022, FOR THE ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF
THE CITY COUNCIL BY DISTRICTS 1 , 3 , A N D 5 AS

REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW

CITIES AND THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare as follows:

A. Under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California and Chapter 2.05, Section 2.05.080 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 8, 2022, for the election of Municipal Officers by Districts 1, 3, and 5 for the purpose of electing the following members of the City Council:

1. A member of the City Council for the full term of four (4) years for District 1, with the incumbent being Lorena Barajas Bisbee.

2. A member of the City Council for the full term of four (4) years, for District 3, with the incumbent being Brian Berkson.

3. A member of the City Council for the full term of four (4) years, for District 5, with the incumbent being Chris Barajas.

SECTION 2. General Election Called for November 8, 2022.

A. Pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities and Chapter 2.05 , Section 2.05.080 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Jurupa Valley, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 20 22, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing Members of the City Council for the full term of four years by Districts 1, 3, and 5 as set forth in the Adopted Electoral District Map attached as Exhibit A.

SECTION 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 10002 and 10403 of the Elections Code of the State of California, this C ity Council hereby requests the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside (“Registrar of Voters”) to conduct the municipal election for the City of Jurupa Valley described in Section 1 of this Resolution (“Municipal Election”).

A. It is desirable that th e Municipal Election be conducted by the Registrar of Voters on November 8, 2022 with the Registrar of Voters establishing the precincts, polling -2-

places and election officers, and that the Registrar of Voters canvass the returns of the Municipal Election.

B. Except for those services routinely conducted by the City Clerk, delegation is hereby made to the Registrar of Voters and the County Elections Department of the powers and duties of the elections officer of the City to conduct the Municipal Election in accordance with all applicable laws and procedures.

C. The Municipal Election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election and only one form of ballot shall be used.

D. The City recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation, and agrees to reimburse the County for such additional costs.

E. The Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of the Municipal Election in the time, form and m anner as required by law.

SECTION 4. The ballots to be used at the Municipal Election shall be in the form and content as required by law.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is authorized to procure and furnish or to procure services to furnish all official ballots , notices, printed material and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia and other documents that they may deem necessary or advisable in order to properly and lawfully conduct the Municipal Election.

SECTION 6. The polls for the Municipal Election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Election Code of the State of California.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall complete the canvass of the Municipal Election and shall certify the results to this City Council in accordance with law . The City Clerk is authorized to procure such material, equipment, supplies and personnel as are reasonably necessary to accomplish the canvass.

SECTION 8. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the Municipal Election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

SECTION 9. It is the intent of the City Council that this Resolution and Resolution 2022-72 shall operate together to provide for the election of certain designated Members of the City Council by Districts 1, 3, and 5 described above. Nothing in this Resolution is intended to nor shall it be construed or interpreted to repeal or modify Resolution No. 2022-

72. SECTION 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 11. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption. -3-

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of July, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-71, was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of July 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES
NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of July 2022.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
A-1

EXHIBIT A

ADOPTED ELECTORAL DISTRICT MAP

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-72

A RESOLUTION OF THE CI TY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIF ORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS

FOR CANDIDATES FOR E LECTIVE OFFICE PERTA INING TO

CANDIDATE STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT
AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Jurupa Valley on November 8, 2022 may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candid ate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 4:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.

SECTION 2. FEDERAL VOTING RIGHTS ACT. Pursuant to Section 203, of the Voting Rights Act, the Riverside County R egistrar of Voters is required to provide election materials in both English and Spanish.

SECTION 3. PAYMENT.

A. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate statement in both English and Spanish.

B. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate statement into Spanish.

C. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of the printing, handling, translating, and mailing of the candidate’s statements filed pursuant to this section, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Action of 1965, as amended, and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the local agency his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statemen t included in the voter’s pamphlet.

D. In the event an estimated payment is required, the estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depend ing on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual costs. In the event of underpayment, the Clerk shall require the candidate to -2-

pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of an overpayment, the Clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election.

SECTION 4. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL . No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this Resolution after, or once nominating petitions are issued.

SECTION 6. All previous Resolutions establishing Council policy on payment for candidate statements are repealed.

SECTION 7. This Resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 8, 2022 and shall then be repealed.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 9. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 7th day of July, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-3-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-72, was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 7th day of July 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

NONE:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 7th day of July, 2022.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 7, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.C
I
NTRODUCTION OF A CITY ORDINANCE, ADDING SECTION 2.37 OF

THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLI SHING THE
PUBLIC WORKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE; AND ADOPTING A CITY

RESOLUTION CONFIRMING A STIPEND FOR MEMBERS OF THE

PUBLIC WORKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE PURSUANT TO SECTION

2.37.080 OF THE JURU PA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE; AND

ADOPTING A CITY RESO LUTION ABOLISHING TH E TRAFFIC

SAFETY COMMITTEE
RECO

MMENDATION

1. That
the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2022-13, entitled:

AN O

RDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 2.37 TO THE JURUPA

VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING THE PUBLIC WORKS

ADIVSORY COMMITTEE
2 That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-73, entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING A STIPEND FOR MEMBERS OF

THE PUBLIC WORKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

3. That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-74, entitled:

A RESO

LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ABOLISHING THE JURUPA VALLEY TRAFFIC

SAFETY COMMITTEE

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

BACKGROUND

The City’s Traffic Safety Committee was established in January 2015 with the adoption of Resolution No. 2015- 03. The Traffic Safety Committee serves the Council in an advisory capacity. The Traffic Safety Committee meets monthly or on as needed basis to review and discuss complaints from the public and make traffic safety related recommendations.

Established duties of the Traffic Safety C ommittee are limited to addressing complaints related to traffic and road safety. The Public Works Department has received complaints about trees, sidewalks, street sweeping, infrastructure, and other Public Works items, which fall outside the scope of the Traffic Safety Committee. A Public Works Advisory Committee would expand the role and responsibilities of the Traffic Safety Committee to address such items.

Jurupa Valley City CouncilJuly 7, 2022

Jurupa Valley City Council
July 7, 2022