Jurupa Valley City Council
July 21, 2022

Table 7 ‐ Primary Collision Factor by Year
Primary Collision Factor 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total % Auto Right-of-Way Violation 172 118 114 161 67 632 13.1% Brakes 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.0%
Driving Under the Influence 57 46 61 75 100 339 7.0%
Following too Close 17 12 5 7 4 45 0.9%
Impeding Traffic 3 0 2 0 1 6 0.1%
Improper Passing 25 25 16 15 14 95 2.0%
Improper Turning 291 312 286 275 248 1,412 29.3%
Lights 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.0%
Not Stated 5 8 0 27 111 151 3.1%
Other Equipment 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.0%
Other Hazardous Movement 38 24 26 28 10 126 2.6%
Other Improper Driving 4 4 5 10 4 27 0.6%
Other Than Driver 14 11 12 8 6 51 1.1%
Pedestrian Violation 12 9 16 18 10 65 1.3%
Pedestrian or Other Under
the Influence
1 0 0 0 0 1 0.0%
Traffic Signal or Sign 36 66 55 52 29 238 4.9%
Unknown 14 13 20 17 16 80 1.7%
Unsafe Lane Change 2 8 4 6 0 20 0.4%
Unsafe Speed 253 262 279 294 201 1,289 26.7%
Unsafe Starting or Backing 45 39 47 40 32 203 4.2%
Wong Side of the Road 10 8 6 11 6 41 0.8%
Totals 1,000 966 954 1,045 861 4,826
Source: SWITRS collision data, 2021.

Collision Types

The collisions by type from 2016-2020 is seen in Figure 12 and listed in Table 8. Analysis showed four predominant collision types:

1. Rear end collisions {27.2%}

2. Broadside collisions {26.8%}

3. Hit objects {18.1%}, and

4. Sideswipe collisions {17.0%}

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Figure 12 – Collision Type – 2016‐2020

Table 8 – Collisions Type by Year
Collision Type 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total %
Broadside 268 275 238 282 231 1,294 26.8%
Head-On 32 38 50 48 55 223 4.6%
Hit Object 173 155 175 185 187 875 18.1%
Other 42 23 21 13 8 107 2.2%
Overturned 17 8 10 9 10 54 1.1%
Rear-End 283 265 267 292 207 1,314 27.2%
Sideswipe 163 172 161 188 137 821 17.0%
Vehicle-Ped 15 24 30 26 24 119 2.5%
Not Stated / Blank 7 6 2 2 2 19 0.4%
Total 1,000 966 954 1,045 861 4,826
Source: SWITRS collision data, 2021.

Collision Involvement

The collisions involvement, or what the vehicle collided with , is seen in Figure 13 and listed in Table 9. The top four most common collision involvements were:

1. Another moving vehicle {64.5%}

2. Fixed object {17.1%}

3. Parked vehicles {10.5%}, and

4. Pedestrian {2.3%}.

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Overturned
Vehicle / Pedestrian
Other / Not Stated
Head-On
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Broadside
Rear End
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Figure 13 – Collision Involved With – 2016‐2020

Table 9 – Collisions Involved With by Year
Vehicle Collision With 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total % Animal 3 3 7 1 3 17 0.4%
Bicycle 24 15 17 11 11 78 1.6%
Pedestrian 14 22 28 24 25 112 2.3%
Fixed Object 156 157 167 170 177 827 17.1%
Other Object 31 7 17 24 17 96 2.0%
Parked Motor Vehicle 107 107 103 90 101 508 10.5%
Non-Collision 8 7 7 2 7 31 0.6%
Not Stated 11 12 8 10 1 42 0.9%
Train 1 1 0 0 0 2 0.0%
Other Motor Vehicle - (same and other
roadway) 645 635 600 713 519 3,113 64.5%
Total 1,000 966 954 1,045 861 4,826
Source: SWITRS collision data, 2021.

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Train
Animal
Non-Collision
Not Stated
Bicycle
Other Object
Pedestrian
Parked Motor Vehicle
Fixed Object
Other Motor Vehicle
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Section 5.

Emphasis Areas

Emphasis areas were selected based on the “Challenge Areas” identified in 2020-2024 California SHSP and the results of the collision data review. The following 4 emphasis areas were identified, which support the SHSP high pri ority areas o f Active Transportation: Pedestrians & Bicyclists; Impaired Driving; Intersections; Lane Departures; Speed Management/Aggressive Driving as well as the SHSP focus areas for Distracted Driving; Emergency Response; Emerging Technologies, and Young Drivers (15-20):

1. Improper Turning

2. Unsafe Speed

3. Right-of-Way Violation / Failure to Yield

4. Driving Under the Influence / Distracted Driving

The following provides the strategies and goals for each of the four each of the four empha sis areas.

Improper Turning Collisions

Collisions involving improper turning typically involve failure to yield the right -of-way to either oncoming or crossing traffic. That failure to yield can be to other motorists, pedestrians, or bicyclists. These types of collisions can also result in roadway departures of vehicles for various reasons. Vehicles departing the roadway can become overturned, strike fixed objects along the roadway, or can include head‐on and sideswipe collisions with other vehicles. Intersections and street access, such as driveway s, may or may not always be a factor in improper turning collisions, though often improper turning at intersections can result in more severe collisions due to vehicle speeds and the presence of pedestrians and bicyclists crossing the street . A challenge for law enforcement is to determine if an improper turning collision was from distracted driving or other factor since narratives without any other neutral observer may not indicate cell phone or electronic device usage prior to collision.

Other notes from the collision data on improper turning collisions include:

• Nearly 30% of all crashes from 2016‐2020 were improper turning crashes • 63% of all crashes from 2016‐2020 occurred within 150’ of an intersection

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Strategies for Emphasis Area 1:
• Education
- Engagement with Sheriff, RUHS, JUSD, community groups, and Public Works to share materials and knowledge to increase public awareness of road safety. - Target the distractions created by cell phone or electronic device use while operating a motor vehicle, and the likelihood of anyone being involved in a collision due to cell phone/electronic device usage.
- Encourage the public to report incidents of failing to stop at stop sign and traffic signals to collect statistical data on high violation areas.

• Enforcement
- Saturated patrols to areas susceptible to distracted driving or where collision or traffic report data indicates regular incidents of failure to yield collisions, including failing to stop for stop signs and signals.

• Engineering
- Public Works add improved signage retroreflectivity, add left turn lane pockets, guardrail improvements, improved thermoplastic striping and markings, clearing of roadside obstacles, intersection improvements, provide appropriate width travel lanes to control speeds, and widening shoulders in an incremental systemic approach. Whenever possible widen shoulders at least 4‐6 feet to provide improved access to bicycles.
- Public Works provid e improved clear zone/sight distance, left tur n pockets, and/or roundabouts along high incidents streets including Limonite Avenue, Mission Boulevard, and Rubidoux Boulevard.
- Close the median opening at the Van Buren Boulevard and 56 th Street intersection to prohibit uncontrolled left turns and extend the southbound acceleration and deceleration lanes.
- Complete the five -lane cross -section of Rubidoux Boulevard between 20 th Street and 30th Street.
- Install larger mast arm left -turn signs at signalized interse ctions where collisions have been identified, especially for protected -permissive left turn locations.
- Review intersection lighting at high-incident locations.

• Emergency Services
- Ensure Opticom systems are updated and operating correctly at all signalized intersections.
- Review need for signals at fire station driveways.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Goals for Emphasis Area 1:

• Reduce the percentage of all improper turning and failure-to-yield collisions by 15‐ 20% and reduce the number of collisions resulting in death or severe injury by 10% by 2027.
• Reduce property damage to city assets by 20% due to collisions by 2025. • Work with RCSD and community groups on promoting driver safety information and training/defensive driving courses for residents to increase safe driving habits.

Unsafe Speeds Collisions

Speeding is an issue that results in multiple collision types and is manifested on various types of streets. In low speed residential neighborhoods unsafe speed can result in sideswiping of parked cars, striking roadside objects, collisions with pedestrian s and bicyclists, and broadside collisions with vehicles entering and existing side streets and driveways. On higher speed arterials, collisions involving unsafe speeds with typically result in more severe injuries and fatalities. These collisions involve roadway departures with vehicle rollovers or collisions with fix objects. As traffic volumes increase in the region, congestion has resulted in diverting overflow traffic from congested Caltrans freeways during peak hours onto the connecting city streets. Drivers then attempt to make up lost time by speeding along city streets.

A national trend however is the increase in aggressive driving combined with excessive speed. This has contributed to more collisions with both increased severity and ancillary damages. As driving is a goal‐oriented activity, with the purpose of arriving at a destination quickly, when combined with technology making automobiles more comfortable and powerful than ever before this has contributed to increased collisions .

Traffic collisions that occur close to intersections also could indicate instances of excessive speeding and/or distracted driving and the increased likelihood of a roadway lane departure, rear‐end or head‐on collisions.

Strategies for Emphasis Area 2:
• Education
- All stakeholders have open discussions with targeted groups likely to exhibit forms of unnecessary risky driving (young drivers).
- Obtain safety materials published by Caltra ns, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and other organizations and post information on the city’s website and distribute to other organizations and community groups promoting slower vehicle speeds and the hazards of speeding , especially to targeted drivers (young drivers).

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

- Work with RCSD and JUSD on promotion of responsible driving to school - aged drivers.

• Enforcement
- High Visibility Enforcement / Saturated Patrols
- Assist with identifying specific travel corridors with unsafe speeding and passing through citation history

• Engineering
- Identify corridors where excessive speeding and unsafe passing is likely to take place through RCSD citation history, roadway evidence (such as skid marks for rapid breaking, pavement rutting on the outside of curves, worn centerline markings, or high incidences of sign knockdowns or guardrail/fencing strikes), and concerned input through citizen/elected officials.
- Review high incident corridors, especially school areas, for implementation of traffic calming and traffic control devices for reducing speeds. - Prepare new street section standards that incorporate narrower streets and Local Street and intersection traffic calming.
- Identify locations for pilot project mini roundabouts, speed humps, and chicanes to reduce traffic speeds.
- Install sidewalks in areas where travel speeds are incompatible with pedestrian activity.
- Public Works to provide improved clear zone/sigh t distance, left turn pockets, reduce the number of roadside objects and hazards, improve/provide guardrails in areas with departure issues, and/or roundabouts along high incidents streets including Limonite Avenue, Mission Boulevard, and Rubidoux Boulevard.
- Work with Caltrans on expansion of ramp areas to provide necessary capacity to limit diversion of overflow traffic to city streets. - Public Works to review traffic management options, including traffic signal synchronization programs, and search for available funding to implement programs that allow for effective traffic flow yet reduce instances of aggressive driving.
- Incorporate traffic calming feature and Complete Streets designs into all new development activity.
- Review the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to identify priority locations based on collision and citation data.

• Emergency Services
- Work with staff to identify high citation locations for identification and implementation of speed reduction measures.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

- Assist in identifying options for enforcement of speeds in residential neighborhoods.

Goals for Emphasis Area 2:
• Circulate informational material on distracted & aggressive driving to promote safe driving practices in Jurupa Valley by 2025.
• Observe a reduction of unsafe speed / right of way collisions resulting in death or severe injury by 15% by 2027.
• Increase awareness of aggressive driving habits through a collaborative public awareness campaign.
• Improve driver perceptions of safety through reviewing Yolo County Public Works capital improvement projects.

Right-of-Way / Failure to Yield Collisions

These types of collisions are similar to the improper turning collisions discussed above in Emphasis Area 1. These collisions, however, do not involve the violating vehicle turning or changing streets. They are most often the at -fault driver running a stop sign or traffic signal or failing to yield to another driver backing out of a driveway. These collisions are often exacerbated by excessive or unsafe speeds by the drivers and/or a lack of attention to their surroundings or distracted driving. Collison reduction strategies can include increasing the conspicuity of others at high collision locations and of roadside objects and hazards. Reducing driver overload is also important. When drivers have too much information to process they often can miss key information that would allow them to avoid a collision.

Strategies for Emphasis Area 3:
• Education
- Engage stakeholders in open discussions with targeted groups likely to exhibit forms of unnecessary risky driving (especially young drivers). - Provide materials prepared by FHWA, NHTSA, and other sources on the dangers of aggressive and distracted driving to community groups.

• Enforcement
- High Visibility Enforcement / Saturated Patrols
- Assist with identifying specific locations with a citation and/or collision history.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

• Engineering
- Identify corridors and intersections where excessive vehicle right-of-way collisions occur by annually reviewing the top collision locations in the city. - Identify and document unreported collision locations by identifying roadway evidence such as skid marks, damage on the outside of curves, worn centerline markings, or high incidences of sign and signal knockdowns or guardrail/fencing strikes.
- Public Works provide regular maintenance of vegetation blocking sight lines at intersection and signs or signals.
- Maintain and refresh signs and pavement markings at or approaching intersections.
- Review sight lines at intersections and restrict on-street parking near intersections that will restrict adequate visibility.
- Review development plans and construction and update development standards to ensure that driveways are not placed too close to intersections so as to limit sight distances.
- Use corner bumpouts at Collector and Local Street intersections to increase the visibility of pedestrians preparing to cross the street. - Use colored bike lane boxed near intersection to alert motorists that the travel paths of bicyclists may cross with turning vehicles. - Provide pedestrian-actuated crossing controls at uncontrolled high activity crossings. Use leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections where there is regular pedestrian activity.
- Use larger-than-standard mast arm signage at signalized intersections that have protected-permissive left-turn operations.

Goals for Emphasis Area 3:
• Circulate informational material on distracted & aggressive driving to promote safe driving practices in Jurupa Valley through Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, the city website, social and religious groups, businesses serving alcohol in the city, and social networks.
• Observe a reduction of unsafe speed/right-of-way collisions resulting in death or severe injury by 15% by 2025.
• Increase awareness of aggressive driving habits through a collaborative public awareness campaign.
• Reduce property damage to city assets by 20% due to collisions by 2025.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Driving Under the Influence and Distracted Driving Collisions

In multiple locations, driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs, both recreational and prescription, has remained a challenge in traffic safety. As a primary collision factor, DUIs also will typically involve dangerous secondary collision factors. In reviewing DUI collision incidents in Jurupa Valley, the percentage of DUI collisions represents the amount of collisions involving DUI over the total number of collisions for each type for that year.

Of the DUI related collisions between 2016 and 2020:
• 26.9% (22/82) of all injury (KABC) collisions
• 15.9% of all fatal/severe injury collisions (22/138)
• Occur primarily on weekends (Friday‐Sunday)
• The number of DUI involved collisions has doubled in the last 5 years from a low of 46 in 2017 to 100 collisions in 2020.

Strategies for Emphasis Area 4:
• Education
- All stakeholders continued support of education, emergency, and enforcement efforts with the RCSD and the Office of Traffic Safety for grants to bring DUI and distracted driving education to local schools. - Support of mandatory treatment programs, peer group counseling for prior DUI offenders.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

- Continued efforts to describe adverse effects of alcohol and drug abuse and its consequences on the roads.
- Circulate informational material on distracted & impaired driving to promote safe driving practices in Jurupa Valley through Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, the city website, social and religious groups, businesses serving alcohol in the city, and social networks.
- Work with RUHS and Jurupa Unified School District on the distribution of materials to teens on the effects and consequences of DUI and distracted driving and riding with impaired/distracted drivers.

• Enforcement
- Continue high-visibility enforcement.
- Support RCSD efforts to obtain OTS grants for DUI checkpoints.

• Engineering
- Increasing the clear recovery zones, when funding and right of way is available, could reduce the severity of collisions by providing an area clear of fixed objects if a vehicle leaves the roadway.
- Adding or upgrading guardrail and end treatments.
- Improved marking and signage especially on curves.
- Improved lighting at intersections or horizontal curves.

Goals for Emphasis Area 4:
• Reduce the number of persons killed and severely injured in alcohol/drug- involved collisions to less than 5% of all collisions by 2025. • Prepare and provide driver educational materials on the city website and via handouts for distribution to stakeholders to community groups. • Identify locations where concentrations of alcohol and/or drug-impaired drivers have been cited or involved in collisions.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Section 6.

Proven Countermeasures

FHWA’s Proven Safety Countermeasures initiative (PSCi ) is a collection of countermeasures and strategies effective in reducing roadway fatalities and severe injuries on our Nation’s highways. Transportation agencies are strongly encouraged to consider widespread implementation of PSCs to accelerate t he achievement of local, State, and National safety goals. More information on the proven countermeasures can be obtained through the FHWA’s website at
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/. Summary sheets with detailed descriptions of each of the various countermeasures are included in the Appendix. The proven countermeasures are classified by general areas as follows:

SPEED MANAGEMENT
• Safety Cameras
• Variable Speed Limits
• Appropriate Speed Limits for All Road Users

ROADWAY DEPARTURE
• Wider Edge Lines
• Enhanced Delineation for Horizontal Curves
• Longitudinal Rumble Strips and Stripes
• Roadway SafetyEdge
• Roadside Design Improvements
• Median Barriers

INTERSECTIONS
• Backplates with reflective borders
• Corridor Access Management
• Reduce Left-Turn Conflicts at Intersections
• Roundabouts
• Yellow Change Intervals
• Systemic Application of Multiple Low-Cost Countermeasures at Stop-Controlled Intersections

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLIST
• Crosswalk Visibility Enhancements
• Bicycle Lanes
• Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

• Leading Pedestrian Intervals
• Medians and Pedestrian Refuge Islands
• Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons
• Road Diets / Roadway Reconfiguration
• Walkways

CROSSCUTTING
• Pavement Friction Management
• Lighting
• Roadway Safety Audits

Caltrans incorporates the PSCIs with other roadway safety-related countermeasures from the FHWA Crash Modification Factors (CMF) Clearinghouse. The Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) for Californ ia’s Local Road Owners (v1.6) includes 83 different countermeasures that may be utilized to develop infrastructure projects that are eligible for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding, including:

NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION COUNTERMEASURES
• Add intersection lighting
• Convert to all-way STOP control (from 2-way or Yield control) • Install signals
• Convert intersection to roundabout (from all way stop) • Convert intersection to roundabout (from stop or yield control on minor road) • Convert intersection to mini-roundabout
• Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs
• Upgrade intersection pavement markings
• Install Flashing Beacons at Stop-Controlled Intersections • Install flashing beacons as advance warning
• Install transverse rumble strips on approaches
• Improve sight distance to intersection (Clear Sight Triangles) • Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) • Install splitter-islands on the minor road approaches • Install raised median on approaches
• Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns • Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections
• Install right-turn lane
• Install left-turn lane (where no left-turn lane exists) • Install raised medians / refuge islands
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

• Install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (new signs and markings only)
• Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
• Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
• Install Pedestrian Signal (including Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK))

SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION COUNTERMEASURES
• Add intersection lighting
• Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
• Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) • Install emergency vehicle pre-emption systems
• Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before)
• Provide protected left turn phase (left turn lane already exists) • Convert signal to mast arm (from pedestal-mounted)
• Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) • Install flashing beacons as advance warning
• Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) • Install raised median on approaches
• Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
• Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns • Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections
• Convert intersection to roundabout (from signal)
• Install pedestrian countdown signal heads
• Install pedestrian crossing
• Pedestrian Scramble
• Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) • Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)

ROADWAY COUNTERMEASURES
• Add segment lighting
• Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone • Install Median Barrier
• Install Guardrail
• Install impact attenuators
• Flatten side slopes
• Flatten side slopes and remove guardrail
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

• Install raised median
• Install median (flush)
• Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
• Install acceleration/ deceleration lanes
• Widen lane (initially less than 10 ft)
• Add two-way left-turn lane
• Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) • Widen shoulder
• Curve Shoulder widening (Outside Only)
• Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves)
• Flatten crest vertical curve
• Improve curve superelevation
• Convert from two-way to one-way traffic
• Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) • Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) • Install chevron signs on horizontal curves
• Install curve advance warning signs
• Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) • Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
• Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers • Install edge-lines and centerlines
• Install no-passing line
• Install centerline rumble strips/stripes
• Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes
• Install bike lanes
• Install Separated Bike Lanes
• Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) • Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) • Install raised pedestrian crossing
• Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
• Install animal fencing

The countermeasures ut ilize crash reduction factors (CRF) established from the CMF Clearinghouse studies to determine effectiveness in reducing collisions. CRFs are used to calculate the expected benefit achieved with countermeasure implementation based on crash costs established in the LRSM. The benefit is compared to countermeasure costs to determine a benefit -cost ratio (BCR) for the project . Based on the ranking of BCRs , projects can be compared and a determination made as to which projects will provide the best return on investment and address the most serious safety issues.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Section 7.

Implementation of Countermeasures

This penultimate step of the safety plan is determining and implementing the identification of specific projects and their priority for implementation of each project, or subsequently additional or modified projects.

Prioritization Strategy

The prioritization of the projects and initiatives identified in this report will be developed through a multi-tasked approach. Some initiatives will be implemented through changes to policies and standards along with regular reporting mechanisms. Others will be through programmed cap ital projects and companion efforts with area development and redevelopment projects. Yet others will be via grant -funded opportunities and can be advanced as funding is provided. Development of the Jurupa Valley LRSP qualifies the city for eligibility to receive Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding for roadway safety infrastructure at signalized intersections, non -signalized intersections, and roadway segments. Up to 90% of project costs for preliminary engineering (PE), right-of-way (ROW), and construction (CON) phases would be awarded for BCR applications and between $250,000 and $1 million would be available for each set-aside funding category: guardrail upgrades, pedestrian crossing enhancements, installing edgelines, and bicycle safety improvements.

Through the collision data, and statistical evidence (e.g. RCSD incident reports, and an expectation of higher traffic volume locations) staff ca n identify where our safety stakeholders can focus implementation of safety countermeasures in engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services.

Recommended Projects Incorporating Proven Countermeasures

Based on the strategies for the emphasis areas and the countermeasures listed in the previous sections, the projects/efforts listed in Table 10 are recommended to reduce collisions and provide for safer streets for all users.

The timing and priority of these projects will be determined based on the availability of implementation funding, opportunities to combine activities with new development and/or other capital projects, and the regular review of the plan’s effectiveness.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Capital Improvement Projects

The City of Jurupa Valley Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has many upcoming projects that aim to improve public safety on its road infrastructure network. Some of these projects either include or have the potential to include traffic safety devices and proven countermeasures to assist in addressing the issues identified in the previous report sections. A copy of the current CIP infrastructure program is included in the Appendix.

Key CIP and development -related projects that implement various street improvements and countermeasures include the following:

CIP Projects
Market Street Bridge Replacement
Replace the Santa Ana River bridge and widen Market Street to four lanes plus left turn lanes from north of Rivera Street in Riverside to north of 24 th Street/Via Cerro. Provide wider shoulders and a pedestrian walkway.

Mission Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Replace the bridge over the Santa Ana River east of Crestmore Road and add a Class IV cycle track to the south side of the bridge and provide raised median.

HSIP Citywide Fiber Optic and Reflective Border Signal Backing Plate Modification Project Develop citywide fiber optic interconnect between traffic signals to allow for adaptive traffic signal interconnect and add reflective border traffic signal backing plates on all traffic signals.

HSIP Citywide Guardrail Upgrade Project
Replace out-of-date existing guardrails in various locations within t he city with current Caltrans standard Midwest Guardrail Design sections and attenuators.

Development Projects
Rubidoux Boulevard and 20th Street/Market Street Intersection Modification Add second turn lanes, remove freeflow right-turn lane, and remove median -mounted traffic signal poles and setback corner poles to reduce roadside hazards.

High Visibility Crosswalk Installation
As a requirement for various development project significant impacts existing crosswalks will be replaced with ladder-type high visibility striping and pedestrian-actuated flashers at select locations.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Rubidoux Boulevard Guardrail Project
The CalPortland Company is contributing to a project to install new guardrail along the east side of Rubidoux Boulevard between Production Circle and Castellano Road. The city will partner with CalPortland to complete the project.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion

PROGRAMS / STANDARDS
CATEGORY: SPEED MANAGEMENT
Appropriate Speed Limits for All Users – Identify locations where reduced speed limits may be warranted based on collision data or other appropriate metrics per AB 43.

Citywide
In 2014, the city reduced the speed limits on about 68% of surveyed (non-local) streets by 5 miles per hour. In 2021, AB 43 changed the rules for how speed limits are set in California. However, the rule changes do not take effect until June 2024 or until the Judicial Council completes additional steps.

Review residential neighborhood locations for radar speed feedback signs at selected locations. Citywide Prepare guidelines for analyzing the conditions suitable for the placement of speed feedback cameras to use in evaluating locations on the city street system to install speed feedback signs where speeding is an issue.

Install traffic calming measures on Local Streets in new development and on selected Neighborhood Collector streets. Residential neighborhoods In neighborhoods where there is curb and gutters installed, review options for installing traffic calming devices to slow traffic on selected neighborhood collector streets and those with a documented history of speeding problems.

Reduce the standard Local Street width from 40 feet to no more than 36 feet, unless there will be Class II bike lanes provided. Local Streets The city’s typical local street cross-section is a 40-foot wide street in a 60-foot right-of-way. The wider street cross- section encourages speeding even when there is on-street parking present. Local Street standard cross-sections should be reduced to no more than 36 feet wide regardless of the right-of-way width unless Class II bike lanes are being included. Develop design standards that incorporate Complete Streets criteria and components to accommodate all potential users of the right-of-way.

Reduce Collector and Arterial Street through lane widths to 11 feet wide.

Reduce select left-turn lanes to 10 feet if a raised median is installed and limited truck traffic is expected.

New development
Reducing lane widths will assist in reducing traffic speeds, will reduce crossing widths for pedestrians at intersections, and will reduce the amount of impermeable roadway surface and runoff. Narrower streets will also allow for wider runoff areas to create additional recovery area.

Reduce travel lanes by adding buffered bike lanes on Master Plan identified corridors.

Streets identified in the Citywide Master
Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Reduce travel lane widths and stripe bike lanes on streets identified in the Bicycle and pedestrian master plan. On Camino Real between Jurupa Road and Limonite Avenue study the option to install a road diet and reduce the 4-lane cross-section to a 3-lane cross-section with bike lanes.

CATEGORY: ROADWAY DEPARTURE
Wider Edge Lines Citywide
Develop citywide striping and marking standards using 6” lines for regular line work and 8” line for wide lines. Establish when to use thermoplastic materials and when to use water-based paint. Establish standard markings for bike lanes and crosswalks. Install wider lines with all new and maintenance restriping.

Enhanced Delineation for Horizontal Curves Citywide Add W8-1 chevron signs to curves where there is either demonstrated roadway departure incidents or engineer’s review of a documented design issue or roadside hazard. Add full-length pole reflective covers to all curve warning signs.

Longitudinal Rumble Strips and Stripes Citywide
Review rural streets with limited lighting for the application of edge line rumble strips. Apply to streets with a history of run off the road collisions. Priority application to those streets with a posted speed of 45 miles per hour or higher.

Install 6” edge lines on streets with a posted speed of over 40 miles per hour with limited street lighting.

Roadway SafetyEdge Citywide
On all streets with no curb and gutter and a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour and above install an FHWA SafetyEdge during all reconstruction and resurfacing projects and include with any new development where no curb and gutter, dike, or berm will be installed.

Roadside Design Improvements Citywide
Remove unnecessary roadside features (signs, furniture, fixed landscaping, etc.) and relocate others farther from the travel lanes to improve clear zones. Locate/relocate all new and replacement traffic signal, flasher, and street light poles farther from the travel lane when possible to limit the potential for vehicle strikes, especially by trucks.

Median Barriers Citywide Install raised medians on major and arterial streets to limit turning activity to select controlled locations, reduce left-turn conflicts, and limit mid-block pedestrian crossings.

CATEGORY: INTERSECTIONS
Traffic Signal Backplates with reflective borders Citywide Replace all traffic signal backing plates with reflective yellow perimeter plates to enhance signal visibility.

Corridor Access Management Citywide
Consolidate development driveways where possible and install raised medians with spaced left-turn/U-turn locations to reduce turning movement conflicts. Have developments access directly onto side streets instead of arterials to reduce turning movement conflicts at driveways.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion Roundabouts Citywide
Install mini roundabouts along neighborhood collector streets to reduce travel speeds and eliminate stop sign violations.

Identify locations along two-lane collector and secondary streets for the placement of roundabouts in lieu of traffic signals or all-way stop sign control.

Yellow Change and All-Red Intervals Signalized intersections Evaluate all traffic signals to ensure that appropriate yellow and all-red intervals are in place. Identify locations where the installation of yellow or red time extensions would reduce yellow and red light running.

CATEGORY: PEDESTRIANS / BICYCLES
Crosswalk Visibility Enhancements Intersections Prepare citywide standards for crosswalk design and placement. Prepare an annual plan for crosswalk replacement with high a visibility design.

Bicycle Lanes Locations identified in the Bicycle and
pedestrian master plan
Install bike lanes per the city’s bicycle and pedestrian master plan and allocate an annual budget to install new bike lanes. Develop standards for installing bicycle facilities as part of all development and CIP projects. Create a bicycle facilities capital fund for development impact contributions that will support bicycle facilities development.

Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) Select uncontrolled crosswalks Identify locations that would be suitable for the installation of RRFBs and identify funding programs. Locations would concentrate on Safe Route to School corridors and access to parks and community facilities.

Leading Pedestrian Intervals Signalized intersections with regular pedestrian activity
At all traffic signals where there is regular pedestrian activity install leading pedestrian intervals to all pedestrians to begin crossing the street before the associated vehicle approach is released.

Medians and Pedestrian Refuge Islands Locations with regular pedestrian crossing activity
Identify locations with regular pedestrian activity where pedestrians must either cross more than four total lanes (through and turning) or at midblock locations where pedestrians may be crossing at a slower pace and review for the installation of median refuge islands to reduce the unprotected crossing distance for pedestrians.

Road Diets / Roadway Reconfiguration Select four-lane streets with traffic volumes not requiring four lanes
Road diets will reduce the street width without significantly the street capacity, especially when there are regular turning volumes at driveways or intersecting streets. Road diets will also reduce travel speeds, reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians, and can provide width needed to install bike lanes or buffers between travel lanes and parked vehicles.

Sidewalks / Walkways
Citywide per locations in the bicycle and
pedestrian master plan, all new
development, and safe route to school
corridors.

Develop an annual program for the installation of new sidewalk on streets, especially near schools, parks, and community facilities.

CATEGORY: CROSSCUTTING
Bi-Annual Road Safety Audit Citywide
Conduct a bi-annual safety audit of city streets to identify higher incident locations and potential in-fill locations for missing infrastructure. Coordinate with incoming and on-going development projects and identify public-private partnerships for to expedite safety improvements.

PROJECTS
CATEGORY: CORRIDORS
Install radar speed feedback signs
- Rubidoux Boulevard between: SR-60
and Mission Boulevard and between
24th Street and 30th Street
- Agate Street between Galena Street
and Mission Boulevard
- Tyrolite Street between Whitney Drive
and Mission Boulevard
Collision data, RCSD records, and Traffic Safety Committee proceedings have identified several corridors where excessive vehicle speeds are a regular issue. The installation of speed feedback signs along these corridors will assist in reminding drivers to watch their speed when traveling on these streets. In combination with other safety features and enforcement the signs will be part of a combined effort to improve safety and lower vehicle speeds.

Guardrails, edge line rumble strips, and wide edge line Rubidoux Boulevard between Production Circle and Castellano Road
This segment of Rubidoux Boulevard has had a regular history of run-off-the-road crashes over the years. As noted in the previous section, CalPortland Company has agreed to partner with the city on funding the installation of guardrail along this section of Rubidoux Boulevard. In addition to the guardrail, the city should install wide edge lines and install outside shoulder rumble strips to alert drivers that they are straying from travel lane.

Install Road Diet to reduce existing four-lane section to three lanes with median left-turn lane.
- San Sevaine Way between Etiwanda
Avenue and Mission Boulevard
San Sevaine Way has a history of drivers exceeding the speed limit and street racing. The installation of a road diet would eliminate the ability of drivers to drive side-by-side and provide a median left-turn lane for vehicles turning into the driveways and side streets along San Sevaine Way.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion - Camino Real between Whitney Drive
and Limonite Avenue
- Bellegrave Avenue between Etiwanda
Avenue and Bain Street
The section of Camino Real between Whitney Drive and limonite Avenue has four-lanes with no left-turn lane, but has residential driveways along its entire length. There are no sidewalks along much of Camino Real, even though it is regularly used by students waking to and from the area schools. The wide street regularly has speeding issues which creates a safety problem. The road diet would allow for the development of sidewalks along Camino Real and/or bike lanes to improve safety.

Bellegrave Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Bain Street has four lanes with no turn lanes. It also has a substantial volume of school-related traffic from Jurupa Valley High School. A road diet to reduce the street three lane along with the extension of Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Bellegrave Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue would divert most through traffic away from this segment of Bellegrave Avenue and improve both traffic and pedestrian safety.

Install traffic signals and restripe to a five-lane cross-section Rubidoux Boulevard between 20th Street and 30th Street
Rubidoux Boulevard between 20th Street and 28th Street is mostly striped as four lanes with side street stop control at 26th and 28th Streets. The installation of traffic signals at 24th and 26th Streets along with restriping the street to five lanes will allow for progressive traffic signal timings to be installed to control the speed and volume of traffic on the street and allow for turning traffic to not stop in the through lanes when waiting turn.

Install Bike Lanes Etiwanda Avenue between Limonite
Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue
Install the bike lanes on Etiwanda Avenue per the prepared engineered plan through lane width reductions and reductions in some on-street parking.

Prepare traffic signal coordination plans.
- Limonite Avenue between Camino Real
and Beach Street
- Rubidoux Boulevard between 20th
Street and Mission Boulevard
- Mission Boulevard between Crestmore
Road and Valley Way
Traffic signal progression can be used to control both corridor speeds and volumes by metering traffic through signalized intersections at a specific rate. These corridors have had various levels of traffic signal progression in the past. With the implementation of the citywide fiber optic project there will be more opportunity to implement adaptive traffic signal timings that can assist with moving traffic along streets at a safer and more efficient pace.

Install raised medians
- Mission Boulevard between Bellegrave
Avenue and San Sevaine Way
- Mission Boulevard between Valley Way
and Pedley Road
- Limonite Avenue between Pats Ranch
Road and Etiwanda Avenue
- Limonite Avenue between Etiwanda
Avenue and Corey Street
- Rubidoux Boulevard between El Rivino
Road and 24th Street
- Sierra Avenue from north of Karen
Lane to Woodbriar Drive
These corridors are all five-lane streets that would benefit from the provision of raised medians to both separate opposing flows of traffic, but also provide access control and limit turning movements to controlled locations reducing the potential for collisions. Some segments of these streets have existing raised medians and some sections are being improved as part of ongoing development projects. In intermediate segments where there is no project to install raised median, capital projects need to be identified to finalize the median infill. These median projects could be funded through development impact fees or partially through grant funding if combined with other safety elements.

CATEGORY: INTERSECTIONS
Install yellow reflective edge traffic signal backing plates All traffic signals Complete the HSIP Cycle 5 grant-funded project to install reflective yellow edge backing plates on all traffic signals heads.

Remove northbound left-turn lane at intersection. Van Buren Boulevard / 56th Street With the development of a new signal-controlled median opening on Van Buren Boulevard at 52nd Street there is no need to maintain the uncontrolled left-turn access at the Van Buren Boulevard and 56th Street intersection. The connection of 56th Street to Van Buren Boulevard can be retained as a right-in/right-out access with expanded deceleration and acceleration lanes, but the new 52nd Street intersection will provide a safer access location.

Install leading pedestrian interval at traffic signals. Mission Boulevard and Pedley Road and Mission Boulevard and Glen Street
To allow pedestrians to begin their crossing maneuver without vehicles beginning to start moving, install leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections that have regular pedestrian activity. The leading pedestrian interval will initiate a walk light for pedestrian a few moments before the adjacent through traffic is released. This will hold any conflicting turn traffic that would conflict with the pedestrian’s path until after the pedestrian has begun crossing.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Table 10 – Implementation Projects
Programs / Project / Countermeasure Location Discussion Install adaptive traffic signal controls with yellow and red light extensions, leading pedestrian intervals, and larger mast arm signage Mission Boulevard between Crestmore
Road and Valley Way
The signalized intersections in this segment of Mission Boulevard have regular pedestrian activity along with increasing vehicle volumes. The adaptive traffic signal timings along with leading pedestrian intervals will allow the traffic signals to adapt to changing traffic volumes during the day. The yellow and red light extensions are programming tools that allow the traffic signals to extend yellow and all-red light intervals if it appears that a driver may not get through an intersection before the conflicting traffic is released. The larger signage will provide a clearer and more prominent message to drivers, especially aging drivers and those with poorer eyesight.

Install traffic signals and left-turn lanes Intersections of Rubidoux Boulevard with 24th Street and 26th Street
The installation of traffic signals along with striping left-turn lanes will allow for safer controlled turns at these intersections and allow for the implementation of progressive traffic signal timings that can be used to control speeds and meter traffic volumes along Rubidoux Boulevard.

Install mini roundabouts
- Intersection of Tyrolite Street and
Halbrook Terrace
- Intersection of Skyview Road and
Sharon Way
These intersections have been used in the past as test cases for the effectiveness of lane striping on controlling vehicle speeds. Both have shown that additional traffic calming measures are required and the installation of all-way stop sign control has led to drivers just running the stop signs due to low off-peak traffic volumes. Mini roundabouts will provide speed control along the street without requiring vehicle to stop. As test locations, the successful implantation of these devices would support the installation of mini roundabouts at other problematic local and collector streets in the city.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan
May 2022

Section 8.

Evaluation & Plan Updates

This final step of the safety plan is determining and implementing the process that will be used to evaluate the success of the plan, ensure implementation, and determine when an update is needed. Following the implementation of projects and application of countermeasures, the city will evaluate the success of the LRS P strategies based on Section 7 “Evaluation of Improvements” of the Cal trans LRSM v1.6. A database will be developed to track countermeasure installations, crash history, and field assessments on an annual basis. Feedback from the public, safety partners, and city maintenance crews will be included to provide a comprehensive evaluation.

The city will continue to host meetings with stakeholders at least once a year to discuss implementation of the plan and strategies for each emphasis area.

• The plan will be evaluated every three years starting in 2025 to see how many goals have been reached or need to be adjusted.
• The plan-initiated projects will be evaluated for effectiveness five years after their implementation to determine their effectiveness.
• Every two years on opposite years as the application ye ar for HSIP grant applications the plan will be reviewed to ensure it is current for locations where grant funding will be requested.

This LRSP is a living document that is recommended to be updated on a regular basis in order to utilize the latest data a nd detect trends. Collision data can be used to evaluate the success of the plan. The Jurupa Valley Department of Public Works will be the primary department responsible for updating this LRSP and will host stakeholder meetings to discuss implementation of the plan and strategies for each emphasis area.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix

A. Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Intersections B. Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Midblock C. List of Proven Countermeasures
D. Jurupa Valley Capital Improvement Program List

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix A: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations - Intersections Rank
Intersection
Collisions
Rank
Intersection
Collisions
2016
1 58th Street at Dodd Street 1 6 Kim Lane at Pedley Road 1 2 Canal Street at Mission Boulevard 1 7 Limonite Avenue at Peralta Place 1 3 Cantu Galleano Ranch Road at I-15 NB Off-
Ramp 1 8 Mission Boulevard at Sikh Temple Way 1
4 Cantu Galleano Ranch Road at Wineville Road 1 9 Mission Boulevard at Pacific Avenue 1 5 Felspar Street at Mission Boulevard 1 10 Riverview Drive at Vista De Oro 1 2017
1 63rd Street at Archer Street 1 7 El Palomino Drive at Limonite Avenue 1 2 Avon Street at Galena Street 1 8 Eucalyptus Avenue at Limonite Avenue 1 3 Ben Nevis Boulevard at Pedley Road 1 9 Grapevine Street at Philadelphia Avenue 1 4 Camino Real at Limonite Avenue 1 10 Lakeside Drive at Live Oak Drive 1 5 Country Village Rd at Oak Leaf Way 1 11 Mission Boulevard at Valley Way 1 6 De La Vista at Riverview Drive (E) 1 12 SR-60 WB On-Ramp at Valley Way 1 2018
1 Bellegrave Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 2 10 Jurupa Road at Mission Boulevard 1 2 26th Street at Hall Avenue 1 11 Jurupa Road at Van Buren Boulevard 1 3 28th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 12 Limonite Avenue at Ridgeview Avenue 1 4 53rd Street at Beach Street 1 13 Limonite Avenue at Pats Ranch Road 1 5 56th Street at Van Buren Boulevard 1 14 Limonite Avenue at Peralta Place 1 6 Camino Montura at Union Street 1 15 Lindsay Street at Mission Boulevard 1 7 Clay Street at General Road 1 16 Mission Boulevard at Vernon Avenue 1 8 Clay Street at Limonite Avenue 1 17 Mountain Shadow Drive at Winncliff Drive 1 9 El Rio Avenue at Hall Avenue 1
2019
1 24th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 2 8 Limonite Avenue at Pats Ranch Road 1 2 30th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 9 Limonite Avenue at Lucretia Avenue 1 3 Archer Street at Limonite Avenue 1 10 Limonite Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 1 4 Bellegrave Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 1 11 Mission Boulevard at Pedley Road 1 5 Ben Nevis Boulevard at Mission Boulevard 1 12 Mission Boulevard at Opal Street 1 6 Etiwanda Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 1 13 Mission Boulevard at Twining Street 1 7 Jurupa Road at Van Buren Boulevard 1
2020
1 24th/Market Street at Via Cerro 2 10 Beach Street at Jurupa Road 1 2 Etiwanda Avenue at Van Buren Boulevard 2 11 Camino Real at Limonite Av 1 3 20th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 12 Country Village Road at Wagon Way 1 4 26th Street at Hall Avenue 1 13 Etiwanda Avenue at Jurupa Road 1 5 34th Street at Daly Avenue 1 14 Galena Street at Kingsbridge Lane 1 6 36th Street at Rubidoux Boulevard 1 15 Granite Hill Drive at Pyrite Street 1 7 53rd Street at Steve Avenue 1 16 Limonite Avenue at Ridgeview Avenue 1 8 56th Street at Van Buren Boulevard 1 17 Mission Boulevard at Pedley Road 1 9 Armstrong Road at Sierra Avenue 1 18 Studio Place at Van Buren Boulevard 1 Source: Riverside County Crossroads Database, 2022.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix B: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Midblock Rank
Intersection
Collisions
Rank
Intersection
Collisions
2016
1 Rubidoux Boulevard: Production Circle to
Castellano Road 2 9 Granite Hill Drive: Camino Real to Pyrite Street 1
2 Felspar Street: 59th Street to 61st Street 1 10 68th St: Holmes Avenue to Carnelian Street 1
3 Hall Avenue: 28th Street to SR-60 W 1 11 Limonite Avenue: Beach Street to Bain Street 1
4 Rubidoux Boulevard: 26th Street to 28th
Street 1 12 Limonite Avenue: Mann Avenue to
Etiwanda Avenue 1
5 Wallace Street: Hall Avenue to 34th Street 1 13 Limonite Avenue: Etiwanda Avenue to Lucretia Avenue 1
6 Rubidoux Boulevard: 28th Street to 29th
Street 1 14 Mission Boulevard: SR-60 WB On-ramp to
Island Avenue 1
7 Canal Street: Alta Street to La Rue Street 1 15 Limonite Avenue: Lucretia Avenue to Wineville Avenue 1
8 Riverview Drive: Vista De Oro to Limonite
Avenue 1 16 Pacific Avenue: Mission Boulevard to
Rustic Lane 1
2017
1 Van Buren Boulevard: Holladay Street to 56th
Street 1 11 Pedley Road: Bravo Estates to Ben Nevis
Boulevard 1
2 Rubidoux Boulevard: 26th Street to 28th
Street 1 12 Jurupa Road: Mizar Way to Eclipse Avenue 1 3 Mission Boulevard: End to Crestmore Rd 1 13 Van Buren Boulevard: 56th Street to Jurupa Road 1
4 Rubidoux Boulevard 36th Street to Wilcox
Square Alley 1 14 Van Buren Boulevard: Bellegrave Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue 1
5 Armstrong Road: Sierra Av to 30th Street 1 15 San Sevaine Way: RCFD Station 17 Driveway to Wacker Drive 1
6 Granite Hill Drive: Camino Real to Pyrite
Street 1 16 Philadelphia Avenue: Chardoney Way to
Grapevine Street 1
7 Live Oak Drive: Frazer Drive to Lakeside Drive 1 17 Troth Street: 48th Street to 50th Street 1 8 Camino Real: Parkland Club Drive to Limonite
Avenue 1 18 Troth Street: 54th Street to 56th Street 1 9 Mission Boulevard: Tyrolite Street to Pyrite
Street 1 19 Etiwanda Avenue: Iberia Street to SR-60
WB Off-ramp 1
10 Rubidoux Boulevard: Production Circle to
Castellano Road 1 20 Pedley Road: Kim Lane to Golondrina Street 1
2018
1 Limonite Avenue: Mann Avenue to Etiwanda
Avenue 2 9 Market Street: End to 24th Street 1
2 Limonite Avenue: Peralta Pl to Camino Real 1 10 Riverview Drive: Kern Drive to Avenue Juan Diaz 1
3 Hall Avenue: Bell Avenue to El Rio Avenue 1 11 Limonite Avenue: Pats Ranch Rd to I-15 NB Off-ramp 1
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix B: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations – Midblock Rank
Intersection
Collisions
Rank
Intersection
Collisions
4 Hall Avenue: El Rio Avenue to 26th Street 1 12 Jurupa Rd: Felspar Street to Van Buren Boulevard 1
5 Hall Avenue: 26th Street to 28th Street 1 13 Van Buren Boulevard: Jurupa Road to Rutile Street 1
6 Rubidoux Boulevard: Avalon St to Production
Circle 1 14 Van Buren Boulevard: Rutile Street to
Bellegrave Avenue 1
7 Rubidoux Boulevard: 26th Street to 28th
Street 1 15 Mission Boulevard: Lindsay St to His Way 1 8 Limonite Avenue: Pacific Av to Limonite
Frontage 1 16 Mission Boulevard: Canal Street to Jurupa Road 1
2019
1 Limonite Avenue: Etiwanda Avenue to
Lucretia Avenue 1 6 20th Street: End to End 1
2 Van Buren Boulevard: Jurupa Road to Rutile
Street 1 7 24th Street: Hall Avenue to Rubidoux
Boulevard 1
3 Van Buren Boulevard: Holladay Street to 56th
Street 1 8 Agua Mansa Rd: Brown Avenue to Wilson
Street 1
4 Van Buren Boulevard: Limonite Avenue to
Holladay Street 1 9 Market St: End to 24th Street 1
5 Limonite Avenue: Morton Avenue to Van
Buren Boulevard 1
2020
1 Mission Boulevard: SR-60 EB Onramp to Soto
Avenue 2 11 Camino Real: Limonite Avenue to Canyon
Terrace Drive 1
2 Mission Boulevard: End to Crestmore Road 2 12 Mission Boulevard: SR-60 WB On-ramp to Island Avenue 1
3 Granite Hill Drive: Pyrite Street to Quartz
Canyon Road 1 13 Van Buren Boulevard: Holladay Street to 56th Street 1
4 Rubidoux Boulevard: Production Circle to
Castellano Road 1 14 Jurupa Road: Hill Place to Cedar Street 1 5 Rubidoux Boulevard: 36th Street to Wilcox
Square Aly 1 15 Mission Boulevard: Hunter Street to
Campbell Street 1
6 Armstrong Road: Gillam Street to Karen Lane 1 16 Jurupa Rd: Beach Street to Rutile Street 1 7 Sierra Avenue: Armstrong Road to Karen
Lane 1 17 Mission Boulevard: His Way to Conning
Street 1
8 Mission Boulevard: Canal Street to Jurupa
Road 1 18 Limonite Avenue: Troth Street to
Ridgeview Avenue 1
9 Fairbanks Avenue: Sedona Drive to Jurupa
Road 1 19 Limonite Avenue: Ridgeview Avenue to
Mann Avenue 1
10 Market Street: End to 24th Street 1 20 Limonite Avenue: Peralta Place to Camino Real 1
Source: Riverside County Crossroads Database, 2022.

City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix C: List of FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures

FHWA-SA-21-029
Roadside Design
Improvements at Curves
Horizontal curves account for 27 percent of all fatal crashes and 80 percent of all fatal crashes at curves are roadway departure crashes. 1 Roadside design
improvements at curves is a strategy encompassing several treatments that target the high-risk roadside environment along the outside of horizontal curves.

These treatments can reduce roadway departure fatalities and serious injuries by giving vehicles the opportunity to recover safely and by reducing crash severity.

Roadside design improvements can be implemented alone or in combination, and are particularly recommended at horizontal curves—where data indicates a higher risk for roadway departure fatalities and serious injuries.

Roadside Design Improvements to
Provide for a Safe Recovery
In cases where a vehicle leaves
the roadway, having strategic
roadside design elements, including
an added or widened shoulder,
flattened sideslopes, or a widened
clear zone can provide drivers with
an opportunity to regain control and
re-enter the roadway in their lane or
come to a safe stop before rolling
over or encountering a fixed object.
• A clear zone is an unobstructed,
traversable roadside area that
allows a driver to stop safely or
regain control of a vehicle that has
left the roadway. Agencies should
avoid adding new fixed objects
such as trees and utility cabinets or
poles in the clear zone. AASHTO’s
Roadside Design Guide details the
clear zone width adjustment factors
to be applied at horizontal curves.
• Slope flattening reduces the
steepness of the sideslope to
increase drivers’ ability to keep the
vehicle stable, regain control of the
vehicle, and avoid obstacles. Slopes
of 1V:4H or flatter are considered
recoverable (i.e., drivers can retain
control of a vehicle by slowing or
stopping). Slopes between 1V:3H
and 1V:4H are generally considered
traversable, but non-recoverable
(i.e., errant vehicle will continue to
the bottom of the slope).
• Adding or widening shoulders
gives drivers more recovery area
to regain control in the event of a
roadway departure.

Roadside Design Improvements to
Reduce Crash Severity
Since not all roadside hazards can be
removed, relocated, or redesigned
at curves, installing roadside barriers
to shield unmovable objects or steep
embankments may be an appropriate
treatment. Three common types of
roadside barriers are:
• Cable barrier is a flexible barrier
made from steel cables mounted
on weak steel posts. Flexible barriers
are more forgiving and have the
most deflection.
• Metal-beam guardrail is a semi-
rigid barrier where a W-beam or
box-beam is mounted on steel
or timber posts. These deflect less
than cable barriers, so they can
be located closer to objects where
space is limited.
• Concrete barrier is a rigid barrier
that has little to no deflection.

Clear zone provided on the outside of
the curve. Source: FHWA.
8%
reduction for
single-vehicle crashes.2
Flatten sideslope from
1V:3H to 1V:4H:
12%
reduction for
single-vehicle crashes.2
Flatten sideslope from
1V:4H to 1V:6H:

For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/counter
measures/safe_recovery/
clear_zones/.

Safety Benefits:
1 Fatality Analysis Reporting System.
2 NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, (2008).
3 Elvik, R., and Vaa, T. Handbook of Road Safety Measures, (2004). 22%
reduction for all crashes.3
Increase the distance to
roadside features from

3.3 ft to 16.7 ft:
44%
reduction for all crashes.3
Increase the distance to
roadside features from

16.7 ft to 30 ft:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-030
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/rltci/index.cfm.

Reduced Left-Turn
Conflict Intersections
Reduced left-turn conflict intersections are geometric designs that alter how left-turn movements occur. These intersections simplify decision-making for drivers and minimize the potential for higher severity crash types, such as head-on and angle. Two highly effective designs that rely on U-turns to complete certain left-turn movements are known as the Restricted Crossing U-turn (RCUT) and the Median U-turn (MUT).

Restricted Crossing U-turn
The RCUT intersection, also known
as a J-Turn, Superstreet, or Reduced
Conflict Intersection, modifies
the direct left-turn and through
movements from cross-street
approaches. Minor road traffic makes
a right turn followed by a U-turn at a
designated location—either signalized
or unsignalized—to continue in
the desired direction. The RCUT is
suitable for and adaptable to a wide
variety of circumstances, ranging
from isolated rural, high-speed
locations to urban and suburban
high-volume, multimodal corridors.

It is a competitive and less costly
alternative to constructing an
interchange. RCUTs work well
when consistently used along
a corridor, but also can be
used effectively at individual
intersections. Studies have
shown that installing an RCUT
can result in a 30-percent
increase in throughput and a
40-percent reduction in network
intersection travel time.1
Median U-turn
The MUT intersection modifies
direct left turns from the major
approaches. Vehicles proceed
through the main intersection,
make a U-turn a short distance
downstream, followed by a right
turn at the main intersection.

The U-turns can also be used for
modifying the cross-street left turns,
similar to the RCUT.

The MUT is an excellent choice for
intersections with heavy through
traffic and moderate left-turn
volumes. Studies have shown a
20- to 50-percent improvement in
intersection throughput for various
lane configurations as a result of
implementing the MUT design. When
implemented at multiple intersections
along a corridor, the efficient two-
phase signal operation of the MUT
can reduce delay, improve travel
times, and create more crossing
opportunities for pedestrians and
bicyclists.

Example of a MUT intersection. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

RCUT
Two-Way
Stop-Controlled to RCUT:
54%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.²
Signalized Intersection
to Signalized RCUT:
22%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.³
Unsignalized Intersection
to Unsignalized RCUT:
63%
reduction in fatal and
injury crashes. 4
MUT
30%
reduction in intersection-
related injury crash rate.5
Example of a unsignalized RCUT intersection.

Source: FHWA
3 1 2
1 Hugher and Jagannathan. Restricted Crossing U-Turn Intersection. FHWA-HRT-09-059, (2009). 2 Edara et al. Evaluation of J-turn Intersection Design Performance in Missouri. MoDOT, (2013). 3 Hummer and Rao. Safety Evaluation of a Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn.

FHWA-HRT-17-082, (2017).
4 Hummer et al. Superstreet Benefits and Capacities. FHWA/NC/2009-06, NC State University, (2010).
5 Synthesis of the Median U-Turn Treatment, Safety, and Operational Benefits, FHWA-HRT-07-033, (2007).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Systemic Application
of Multiple Low-Cost Countermeasures
at Stop-Controlled Intersections
This systemic approach to intersection safety involves deploying a package of multiple low-cost countermeasures, including enhanced signing and pavement markings, at a large number of stop-controlled intersections within a jurisdiction. These countermeasures increase driver awareness and recognition of the intersections and potential conflicts.

There are several benefits to
systemically applying multiple
low-cost countermeasures at stop-
controlled intersections, including,
• Resources are maximized because
the treatments are low cost.
• A high number of intersections can
receive treatment.
• Improvements are highly cost-
effective, with an average benefit-
cost ratio of 12:1, even assuming a
conservative 3-year service life.

The low-cost countermeasures
for stop-controlled intersections
generally consist of the following
treatments:

On the Through Approach
• Doubled-up (left and right),
oversized advance intersection
warning signs, with supplemental
street name plaques (can also
include flashing beacon).
• Retroreflective sheeting on sign
posts.
• Enhanced pavement markings that
delineate through lane edge lines.

On the Stop Approach
• Doubled-up (left and right),
oversized advance “Stop Ahead”
intersection warning signs (can also
include flashing beacon).
• Doubled-up (left and right),
oversized Stop signs.
• Retroreflective sheeting on sign
posts.
• Properly placed stop bar.
• Removal of vegetation, parking, or
obstructions that limit sight distance.
• Double arrow warning sign at stem
of T-intersections.

FHWA-SA-21-031
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/stop/
fhwasa18047.pdf.

Example of countermeasures
on the stop approach.

Source: South Carolina DOT
10%
15%
reduction of nighttime
crashes at all locations/
types/areas.
reduction of fatal and
injury crashes at all
locations/types/areas.

Average
Benefit-Cost Ratio
12:1
$
27%
19%
reduction of fatal and injury
crashes at 2-lane by 2-lane
intersections.
reduction of fatal and
injury crashes at rural
intersections.

Safety Benefits:

Example of countermeasures on the
through approach.

Source: South Carolina DOT
Source: T. Le et al. “Safety Effects of Low-Cost Systemic Safety Improvements at Signalized and Stop-Controlled Intersections,” 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper Number 17-05379, January 2017.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-032
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
ped_bike/step/resources/
docs/fhwasa19040.pdf.

Leading Pedestrian
Interval
A leading pedestrian interval (LPI) gives pedestrians the opportunity to enter the crosswalk at an intersection 3-7 seconds before vehicles are given a green indication. Pedestrians can better establish their presence in the crosswalk before vehicles have priority to turn right or left.

LPIs provide the following benefits:
• Increased visibility of crossing
pedestrians.
• Reduced conflicts between
pedestrians and vehicles.
• Increased likelihood of motorists
yielding to pedestrians.
• Enhanced safety for pedestrians
who may be slower to start into the
intersection.

FHWA’s Handbook for Designing
Roadways for the Aging Population
recommends the use of the LPI at
intersections with high turning vehicle
volumes. Transportation agencies
should refer to the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices for guidance on
LPI timing and ensure that pedestrian
signals are accessible for all users.

Costs for implementing LPIs are very
low when only signal timing alteration
is required.
13%
reduction in pedestrian-
vehicle crashes at
intersections.1
LPIs reduce potential conflicts between
pedestrians and turning vehicles.

Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

An LPI allows a pedestrian to establish a
presence in the crosswalk before vehicles are
given a green indication. Source: FHWA
1 Goughnour, E., D. Carter, C. Lyon, B. Persaud, B. Lan, P. Chun, I. Hamilton, and K. Signor. “Safety Evaluation of Protected Left-Turn Phasing and Leading Pedestrian Intervals on Pedestrian Safety.” Report No. FHWA-HRT-18-044. Federal Highway Administration. (October 2018)

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-033
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
LRSPDIY/.

Local Road
Safety Plans
A local road safety plan (LRSP) provides a framework for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing roadway safety improvements on local roads.

The LRSP development process and content are tailored to local issues and needs. The process results in a prioritized list of issues, risks, actions, and improvements that can be used to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on local roads. FHWA has developed several resources including an LRSP Do- It-Yourself website which further explains the process and includes resources local agencies and their partners need to create and implement an LRSP. 1 1 https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/LRSPDIY/
2 Anderson et al. Noteworthy Practices: Addressing Safety on Locally-Owned and Maintained Roads A Domestic Scan, FHWA-SA-09-019, (2010). 3 Developing Safety Plans: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners, FHWA-SA-12-017, provides guidance on developing an LRSP.

Approximately 75 percent of rural
roads are owned by local agencies.
2 While local roads are less traveled
than State highways, they have a
much higher rate of fatal and serious
injury crashes.2 Developing an LRSP
is an effective strategy to improve
local road safety for all road users
and support the goals of a State’s
overall Strategic Highway Safety Plan
(SHSP).

Although the development process
and resulting plan can vary
depending on the local agency’s
needs, available resources, and
targeted crash types, aspects
common to LRSPs include:
• Stakeholder engagement
representing the 4E’s:
engineering,
enforcement,
education, and
emergency
medical services.
• Collaboration
among
municipal,
county, Tribal,
State, and/or
Federal entities
to leverage
expertise and
resources.
• Identification of target crash types
and crash risk with corresponding
recommended proven safety
countermeasures.
• Timeline and goals for
implementation and evaluation.

Local road agencies should consider
developing an LRSP to be used as a
tool for reducing roadway fatalities,
injuries, and crashes.
3 LRSPs can
help agencies create a prioritized
list of improvements. LRSPs are
also a proactive risk management
technique to demonstrate an
agency’s responsiveness. The
plan should be viewed as a living
document that can be updated to
reflect changing local needs and
priorities.

Agencies have experienced
the following benefits after
LRSP implementation:

Infographic showing the LRSP process. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:
25%
17%
reduction in fatal and
serious injury crashes on
county-owned roads in
Washington State.
reduction in county road
fatalities in Minnesota.
35%
reduction in severe
curve crashes in Thurston
County, WA.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Enhanced Delineation
for Horizontal Curves
Enhanced delineation at horizontal curves includes a variety of potential strategies that can be implemented in advance of or within curves, in combination, or individually.

Potential Strategies In Advance of Curve Within Curve
Pavement markings (standard width
or wider)
In-lane curve warning pavement markings
Retroreflective strips on sign posts
Delineators
Chevron signs
Enhanced Conspicuity (larger, fluorescent,
and/or retroreflective signs)
Dynamic curve warning signs
(including speed radar feedback signs)
Sequential dynamic chevrons
Enhanced delineation treatments
can alert drivers to upcoming curves,
the direction and sharpness of the
curve, and appropriate operating
speed.

Agencies can take the following
steps to implement enhanced
delineation strategies:

1. Review signing practices and
policies to ensure they comply
with the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
principles of traffic control devices.

Consistent practice for similar
curves sets the appropriate driver
expectancy.

2. Use the systemic approach to
identify and treat problem curves.

For example, Minnesota uses risk
factors that include curve radii
between 500 and 1,200 ft, traffic
volumes between 500 and 1,000
vehicles per day, intersection in
the curve, and presence of a
visual trap.1

3. Match the appropriate strategy
to the identified problem(s),
considering the full range of
enhanced delineation treatments.

Once the MUTCD requirements and
recommendations have been met,
an incremental approach is often
beneficial to avoid excessive cost.

FHWA-SA-21-035
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/
countermeasures/horicurves/.

Chevron signs with retroreflective strips on sign
posts installed along a curve. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

Chevron Signs
25% reduction in nighttime
crashes.1
16% reduction in
non-intersection fatal and
injury crashes.2
Oversized Chevron Signs
15% reduction in fatal and
injury crashes.3
Sequential Dynamic Chevrons
60% reduction in fatal and
injury crashes.3
In-Lane Curve Warning
Pavement Markings
35 - 38% reduction in
all crashes.4,5
New Fluorescent Curve Signs
or Upgrade Existing Curve
Signs to Fluorescent Sheeting
18% reduction in non-
intersection, head-on,
run-off-road, and sideswipe
in rural areas.1
1 Albin et al. Low-Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety 2016. FHWA-SA-15-084, (2016). 2 Srinivasan et al. Safety Evaluation of Improved Curve Delineation. FHWA-HRT-09-045, (2009). 3 Lyon et al. Safety Evaluation of Two Curve Warning Treatments: In-Lane Curve Warning Pavement Markings and Oversized Chevron Signs. Presented at the 96th TRB Annual Meeting, Paper No. 17-00432, (2017).
4 Hallmark, S. Evaluation of Sequential Dynamic Chevrons on Rural Two-lane Highways.

FHWA, (2017).
5 Donnell et al. Reducing Roadway Departure Crashes at Horizontal Curve Sections on Two-lane Rural Highways. FHWA-SA-19-005, (2019).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-036
Longitudinal Rumble
Strips and Stripes
Longitudinal rumble strips are milled or raised elements on the pavement intended to alert drivers through vibration and sound that their vehicle has left the travel lane. They can be installed on the shoulder, edge line, or at or near the center line of an undivided roadway.

Rumble stripes are edge line or center line rumble strips where the pavement marking is placed over the rumble strip. This can increase the visibility and durability of the pavement marking during wet, nighttime conditions, and can improve the durability of the marking on roads with snowplowing operations.
1 Himes, S., and McGee, H. Decision Support Guide for the Installation of Shoulder and Center Line Rumble Strips on Non-Freeways. Federal Highway Administration Report No. FHWA-SA-16-115. (August 2016). 2 Bedsole et al. Did You Hear That? Public Roads Magazine, Volume 80, No. 4. FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HRT-17-002, (2017).
3 NCHRP Synthesis 339: Centerline Rumble Strips – A Synthesis of Highway Practices, (2005). 4 NCHRP Report 641: Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips, (2009).

With roadway departure crashes
accounting for more than half of
the fatal roadway crashes annually
in the United States, rumble strips
and stripes are designed to address
these crashes by alerting distracted,
drowsy, or otherwise inattentive
drivers who drift from their lane. They
are most effective when deployed
systemically.

Transportation agencies should
consider milled center line rumble
strips (including in passing zone
areas) and milled edge line
or shoulder rumble strips with
bicycle gaps for systemic safety
projects, location-specific corridor
safety improvements, as well as
reconstruction or resurfacing
projects.

Considerations
• Rumble strips are relatively low-
cost, and economic analyses have
indicated benefit/cost ratios that
exceed 100.
1 • Where rumble strips cannot be
placed due to noise concerns,
agencies may consider a design
using an oscillating sine wave
pattern (also known as “mumble
strips”) that reduces noise outside
of the vehicle. However, the safety
benefits of this design need more
study.
2 • Maintenance concerns:
• Where rumble strips are placed
along a pavement joint, there
are typically no issues with
joint stability if the pavement
structure and joint was already
in good condition.
• Studies have shown no
evidence of issues related to
snow, ice, or rain build-up in the
rumble strip.
3 Shoulder rumble strips and center line rumble
stripes are installed on this roadway.

Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

Center Line Rumble Strips
reduction in head-on fatal
and injury crashes on
two-lane rural roads.4
44-64%
Shoulder Rumble Strips
reduction in single vehicle,
run-off-road fatal and
injury crashes on two-lane
rural roads.4
13-51%
Example of an edge line rumble stripe.

Source: Missouri DOT
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/pavement/
rumble_strips/.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Median Barriers
Median barriers are longitudinal barriers that separate opposing traffic on a divided highway and are designed to redirect vehicles striking either side of the barrier. Median barriers significantly reduce the number of cross-median crashes, which are attributed to the relatively high speeds that are typical on divided highways. AASHTO’s Roadside Design Guide (RDG) recommends guidelines for the use of median barriers on high-speed, fully controlled- access roadways for locations where the median is 30 ft in width or less and the average daily traffic (ADT) is greater than 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd).

For locations with median widths greater than 50 ft and where the ADT is less than 20,000 vpd, a median barrier is optional. For locations where the median is between 30 and 50 feet, the RDG suggests an analysis to determine the cost effectiveness of median barrier installation. Median barriers can be cable, metal-beam, or concrete.
• Cable barriers are flexible barriers,
made from steel cables mounted
on weak steel posts, resulting in
less occupant impact force as it
absorbs energy from the crash,
capturing or redirecting the vehicle.

Due to larger deflection, median
width is an important consideration.

These barriers are more adaptable
to slopes typically found in medians.

Cable barriers tend to require more
frequent maintenance and repair
than other barrier types.
• Metal-beam guardrails are
considered semi-rigid barriers,
where the W-beam or box-beam
is mounted to steel or timber
posts. When impacted, they are
designed to deform and deflect,
absorbing some of the crash
energy and redirecting the vehicle.

Metal-beam guardrails often do
not require maintenance after
minor impacts. They deflect less
than cable barriers, so they can
be located closer to objects where
space is limited.
• Concrete barriers are usually rigid
and result in little to no deflection.

They redirect rather than absorb
energy from the impact. Rigid
concrete barriers seldom require
repair or maintenance. Some
agencies have used portable
concrete barriers as median
barriers. These barriers require
repositioning after an impact but
are typically less maintenance than
a post mounted barrier.

To reduce cross-median crashes,
transportation agencies should
review their head-on crash history
on divided highways to identify hot
spots. Agencies should also consider
implementing a systemic approach
to median barrier placement based
on cross-median crash risk factors.

Potential risk factors include:
• Traffic volumes.
• Vehicle classifications.
• Median crossover history.
• Crash incidents.
• Vertical and horizontal alignment.
• Median terrain configurations.

FHWA-SA-21-037
97%
8%
reduction in
cross-median crashes.2
of all fatalities on divided
highways are due to
head-on crashes.1
Median Barriers Installed
on Rural Four-Lane
Freeways
Median cable barrier prevents a
potential head-on crash.

Source: Washington State DOT
Safety Benefits:

For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/
countermeasures/reduce_
crash_severity/.
1 Fatality Analysis Reporting System.
2 NCHRP Report 794: Median Cross-Section Design for Rural Divided Highways, (2011).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
SafetyEdgeSM
The SafetyEdgeSM technology shapes the edge of the pavement at approximately 30 degrees from the pavement cross slope during the paving process. This safety practice eliminates the potential for vertical drop-off at the pavement edge, has minimal effect on project cost, and can improve pavement durability by reducing edge raveling of asphalt.

Rural road crashes involving edge
drop-offs are 2-4 times more likely to
include a fatality than other crashes
on similar roads.
1 Vehicles may leave
the roadway for various reasons
ranging from distracted driver errors
to low visibility, or to the presence
of an animal on the road. Exposed
vertical pavement edges can cause
vehicles to become unstable and
prevent their safe return to the
roadway. The SafetyEdge
SM gives
drivers the opportunity to return to
their travel lane while maintaining
control of their vehicle.

The SafetyEdge
SM technology only
requires adding one of several
commercially available devices to
the screed or endgate when placing
hot-mix asphalt. Forms for shaping
the edge of concrete pavement are
simpler and can be made on site
by the contractor. Some agencies
allow the SafetyEdge
SM to remain
exposed while a segment is under
construction, unlike conventional
pavement edges. However, before
construction ends, agencies should
bring the adjacent roadside flush
with the top of the pavement
for both the SafetyEdge
SM and
traditional pavement edge. Over
time, regardless of the edge type,
the edge may become exposed
due to settling, erosion, and tire
wear. When this occurs, the gentle
slope provided by the SafetyEdge
SM
is preferred versus the traditional
vertical pavement edge.

Transportation agencies should
develop standards for implementing
the SafetyEdge
SM systemwide on all
new asphalt paving and resurfacing
projects where curbs and/or
guardrail are not present, while also
encouraging standard application
for concrete pavements.

FHWA-SA-21-038
Example of the SafetyEdgeSM after backfill
material settles or erodes. Source: FHWA
Cross-section view of an overlay with the SafetyEdgeSM. Source: FHWA-SA-17-044 11%
reduction in fatal and
injury crashes.2
21%
reduction in
run-off-road crashes.2
Safety Benefits:
19%
reduction in head-on
crashes.2
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
safetyedge/.

Benefit-Cost Ratio Range3
700:1 to 1,500:1
$
1 Hallmark et al. Safety Impacts of Pavement Edge Drop-offs, (Washington, DC:

AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety: 2006), p 93.
2 Donnell et al. Development of Crash Modification Factors for the Application of the SafetyEdgeSM on Two-Lane Rural Roads. FHWA-HRT-17-081, (2017). 3 Safety Effects of the SafetyEdgeSM, FHWA-SA-17-044, (2017).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-039
Backplates with
Retroreflective Borders
Backplates added to a traffic signal head improve the visibility of the illuminated face of the signal by introducing a controlled-contrast background. The improved visibility of a signal head with a backplate is made even more conspicuous by framing it with a 1- to 3-inch yellow retroreflective border. Signal heads that have backplates equipped with retroreflective borders are more visible and conspicuous in both daytime and nighttime conditions.

This treatment is recognized as a
human factors enhancement of
traffic signal visibility, conspicuity,
and orientation for both older
and color vision deficient drivers.

This countermeasure is also
advantageous during periods of
power outages when the signals
would otherwise be dark, providing a
visible cue for motorists to stop at the
intersection ahead.

Considerations
Transportation agencies should
consider backplates with
retroreflective borders as part
of their efforts to systematically
improve safety performance at
signalized intersections. Adding a
retroreflective border to an existing
signal backplate is a very low-cost
safety treatment. This can be done
by either adding retroreflective
tape to an existing backplate or
purchasing a new backplate with
a retroreflective border already
incorporated. The most efficient
means of implementing this proven
safety countermeasure is to adopt
it as a standard treatment for
signalized intersections across a
jurisdiction or State.

Implementation challenges
include minimizing installation time,
accessing existing signal heads, and
structural limitations due to added
wind load in instances where an
entire backplate is added. Agencies
should consider the design of the
existing signal support structure to
determine if the design is sufficient to
support the added wind load.
15%
reduction in total crashes.1
Safety Benefits:

Retroreflective Border
Signal Backplate
Signal backplate framed with a
retroreflective border. Source: FHWA
Retroreflective borders are highly
visible during the night. Source: South
Carolina DOT
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safe-
ty Countermeasures, please
visit https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/
and https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/
view/dot/42807.
1 Sayed, T., Leur, P., and Pump, J., “Safety Impact of Increased Traffic Signal Backboards Conspicuity.” 2005 TRB 84th Annual Meeting: Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, Vol. TRB#05-16, Washington, D.C., (2005).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Corridor Access
Management
Access management refers to the design, application, and control of entry and exit points along a roadway. This includes intersections with other roads and driveways that serve adjacent properties. Thoughtful access management along a corridor can simultaneously enhance safety for all modes, facilitate walking and biking, and reduce trip delay and congestion.

Every intersection, from a signalized
intersection to an unpaved driveway,
has the potential for conflicts
between vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicyclists. The number and types of
conflict points—locations where the
travel paths of two users intersect—
influence the safety performance of
the intersection or driveway. FHWA
developed corridor-level crash
prediction models to estimate and
analyze the safety effects of selected
access management techniques
for different area types, land uses,
roadway variables, and traffic
volumes.
1 The following access management
strategies can be used individually or
in combination with one another:
• Reduce density through driveway
closure, consolidation, or
relocation.
• Manage spacing of intersection
and access points.
• Limit allowable movements at
driveways (such as right-in/
right-out only).
• Place driveways on an intersection
approach corner rather than a
receiving corner, which is expected
to have fewer total crashes.
2 • Implement raised medians
that preclude across-roadway
movements.
• Utilize designs such as roundabouts
or reduced left-turn conflicts (such
as restricted crossing U-turn, median
U-turns, etc.).
• Provide turn lanes (i.e., left-only,
right-only, or interior two-way left).
• Use lower speed one-way or two-
way off-arterial circulation roads.

Successful corridor access
management involves balancing
overall safety and mobility for
all users along with the needs of
adjacent land uses.

FHWA-SA-21-040
5-23%
reduction in total crashes
along 2-lane rural roads.3
25-31%
reduction in fatal and
injury crashes along urban/
suburban arterials.4
Schematic of an intersection and adjacent access points. Source: FHWA Tandem roundabouts with a continuous raised
median eliminates left-turn and across-roadway
conflicts. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:

Reducing driveway density
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/cam/index.cfm.
1 Gross et al. Safety Evaluation of Access Management
Policies and Techniques. FHWA-HRT-14-057, (2018).
2 Le et al. Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at
Signalized Intersections. FHWA-HRT-17-084, (2018).
3 Harwood et al. Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways. FHWA-RD-99-207, (2000).
4 Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Oxford, United Kingdom, Elsevier, (2004).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Dedicated Left- and
Right-Turn Lanes at Intersections
Auxiliary turn lanes—either for left turns or right turns—provide physical separation between turning traffic that is slowing or stopped and adjacent through traffic at approaches to intersections. Turn lanes can be designed to provide for deceleration prior to a turn, as well as for storage of vehicles that are stopped and waiting for the opportunity to complete a turn.

While turn lanes provide measurable
safety and operational benefits at
many types of intersections, they
are particularly helpful at two-way
stop-controlled intersections. Crashes
occurring at these intersections are
often related to turning maneuvers.

Since the major route traffic is free
flowing and typically travels at higher
speeds, crashes that do occur are
often severe. The main crash types
include collisions of vehicles turning
left across opposing through traffic
and rear-end collisions of vehicles
turning left or right with other vehicles
following closely behind. Turn lanes
reduce the potential for these types
of crashes.

Installing left-turn lanes and/or right-
turn lanes should be considered
for the major road approaches
for improving safety at both three-
and four-leg intersections with stop
control on the minor road, where
significant turning volumes exist,
or where there is a history of turn-
related crashes. Pedestrian and
bicyclist safety and convenience
should also be considered when
adding turn lanes at an intersection.

Specifically, offset left- and right-turn
lanes will lengthen crossing distances
for pedestrians.

Offset Turn Lanes
Providing offset of left- and right-
turn lanes to increase visibility can
provide added safety benefits, and
is preferable in many situations,
particularly at locations with higher
speeds, or where free-flow or
permissive movements are possible.

At turn lanes with zero or negative
offset, turning vehicles can block
sightlines. For left-turn lanes, this
usually involves opposing left-turning
vehicles occupying the turn lanes
at the same time. For right-turn
lanes, this typically involves right-
turning vehicles from the major
road and vehicles entering the
intersection from the minor road.

In both scenarios, adding positive
offset to turn lanes enhances the
sight distance to approaching
vehicles that conflict with the turning
movement. Offset turn lanes should
be considered when there is a high
frequency of these types of conflicts
in order to reduce the likelihood of a
severe crash.

FHWA-SA-21-041
Left- and right-turn lanes on a two-lane
road. Source: City of Greeley, CO
Illustration comparing zero offset to positive offset of left- and right-turn lanes. Source: FHWA Left-Turn Lanes
reduction in total crashes.1
28-48%
Right-Turn Lanes
reduction in total crashes.1
14-26%
Safety Benefits:

Positive Offset
Left-Turn Lanes
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.2
36%
Zero Offset Positive Offset
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
publications/research/safety
/02103/02103techbrief.pdf. 1 Harwood et al. Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes.

FHWA-HRD-02-089, (2002).
2 Persaud et al. Safety Evaluation of Offset Improvements for Left-Turn Lanes.

FHWA-HRT-09-035, (2009).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-042
Roundabouts
The modern roundabout is an intersection with a circular configuration that safely and efficiently moves traffic. Roundabouts feature channelized, curved approaches that reduce vehicle speed, entry yield control that gives right-of- way to circulating traffic, and counterclockwise flow around a central island that minimizes conflict points. The net result of lower speeds and reduced conflicts at roundabouts is an environment where crashes that cause injury or fatality are substantially reduced.

Roundabouts are not only a safer
type of intersection; they are also
efficient in terms of keeping people
moving. Even while calming traffic,
they can reduce delay and queuing
when compared to other intersection
alternatives. Furthermore, the lower
vehicular speeds and reduced
conflict environment can create
a more suitable environment for
walking and bicycling.

Roundabouts can be implemented
in both urban and rural areas under
a wide range of traffic conditions.

They can replace signals, two-
way stop controls, and all-way
stop controls. Roundabouts are an
effective option for managing speed
and transitioning traffic from high-
speed to low-speed environments,
such as freeway interchange ramp
terminals, and rural intersections
along high-speed roads.

Example of a single-lane roundabout. Source: FHWA
Illustration of a multilane roundabout.

Source: FHWA
Two-Way Stop-Controlled
Intersection to a Roundabout
82%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.1
Signalized Intersection to a
Roundabout
78%
reduction in fatal
and injury crashes.1
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven
Safety Countermeasures,
please visit https://safety.
fhwa.dot.gov/provencounter
measures/ and https://safety.
fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/
roundabouts/index.cfm.

Safety Benefits:
1 AASHTO. The Highway Safety Manual, American Association of State Highway Transportation Professionals, Washington, D.C., (2010).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-043
Yellow Change
Intervals
At a signalized intersection, the yellow change interval is the length of time that the yellow signal indication is displayed following a green signal indication. The yellow signal confirms to motorists that the green has ended and that a red will soon follow.
1 Federal Highway Administration. “Automated Traffic Signal Performance,” (2020). 2 NCHRP Report 731: Guidelines for Timing Yellow and All-Red Intervals at Signalized Intersections, (2011).

Since red-light running is a leading
cause of severe crashes at signalized
intersections, it is imperative that
the yellow change interval be
appropriately timed. Too brief an
interval may result in drivers being
unable to stop safely and cause
unintentional red-light running.

Too long of an interval may result
in drivers treating the yellow as
an extension of the green phase
and invite intentional red-light
running. Factors such as the speed
of approaching and turning
vehicles, driver perception-reaction
time, vehicle deceleration, and
intersection geometry should all be
considered in the timing calculation.

Transportation agencies can improve
signalized intersection safety and
reduce red-light running by reviewing
and updating their traffic signal
timing policies and procedures
concerning the yellow change
interval. Agencies should institute
regular evaluation and adjustment
protocols for existing traffic signal
timing. Refer to the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices for
basic requirements and further
recommendations about yellow
change interval timing. As part of
strategic signal system modernization
and updates, incorporating
automated traffic signal
performance measures (ATSPMs) is
a proven approach to improve on
traditional retiming processes. ATSPMs
provide continuous performance
monitoring capability and the ability
to modify timing based on actual
performance, without requiring
expensive modeling or data
collection.
1 8-14%
reduction in
total crashes.2
12%
reduction in
injury crashes.2
Appropriately timed yellow change intervals
can reduce red-light running and improve
overall intersection safety. Source: FHWA
Safety Benefits:
36-50%
reduction in
red light running.2
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
intersection/signal/
fhwasa13027.pdf.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Pedestrian Refuge
Island
reduction in
pedestrian crashes.2
Median with
Marked Crosswalk
reduction in
pedestrian crashes.2
FHWA-SA-21-044
Medians and
Pedestrian Refuge Islands in Urban
and Suburban Areas
A median is the area between opposing lanes of traffic, excluding turn lanes. Medians in urban and suburban areas can be defined by pavement markings, raised medians, or islands to separate motorized and non- motorized road users.

A pedestrian refuge island (or crossing area) is a median with a refuge area that is intended to help protect pedestrians who are crossing a road. 1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020, March). Pedestrians:
2018 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 850).

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
2 Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors, FHWA-SA-08-011, September 2008, Table 11.

Pedestrian crashes account for
approximately 17 percent of all traffic
fatalities annually, and 74 percent
of these occur at non-intersection
locations.
1 For pedestrians to
safely cross a roadway, they must
estimate vehicle speeds, determine
acceptable gaps in traffic based
on their walking speed, and predict
vehicle paths. Installing a median
or pedestrian refuge island can
help improve safety by allowing
pedestrians to cross one direction of
traffic at a time.

Transportation agencies should
consider medians or pedestrian
refuge islands in curbed sections of
urban and suburban multilane
roadways, particularly in areas with
a significant mix of pedestrian and
vehicle traffic, traffic volumes over
9,000 vehicles per day, and travel
speeds 35 mph or greater. Medians/
refuge islands should be at least
4-ft wide, but preferably 8 ft for
pedestrian comfort. Some example
locations that may benefit from
medians or pedestrian refuge islands
include:
• Mid-block crossings.
• Approaches to multilane
intersections.
• Areas near transit stops or other
pedestrian-focused sites.

Example of a road with a median and
pedestrian refuge islands.

Source: City of Charlotte, NC
Median and pedestrian refuge island
near a roundabout. Source:
www.pedbikeimages.org / Dan Burden
46%
56%
Safety Benefits:

For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safe-
ty Countermeasures, please
visit https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/
and https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/ped_bike/step/docs/
techSheet_PedRefugeIs
land2018.pdf.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-045
Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacons
The pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) is a traffic control device designed to help pedestrians safely cross higher-speed roadways at midblock crossings and uncontrolled intersections. The beacon head consists of two red lenses above a single yellow lens. The lenses remain “dark” until a pedestrian desiring to cross the street pushes the call button to activate the beacon, which then initiates a yellow to red lighting sequence consisting of flashing and steady lights that directs motorists to slow and come to a stop, and provides the right- of-way to the pedestrian to safely cross the roadway before going dark again. 1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020, March). Pedestrians:
2018 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 850). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
2 Zegeer et al. NCHRP Report 841: Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. TRB, (2017). 3 Fitzpatrick, K. and Park, E.S. Safety Effectiveness of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treatment, FHWA-HRT-10-042, (2010).

Nearly 74 percent of pedestrian
fatalities occur at non-intersection
locations, and vehicle speeds are
often a major contributing factor.
1 As a safety strategy to address this
pedestrian crash risk, the PHB is an
intermediate option between a
flashing beacon and a full pedestrian
signal because it assigns right of way
and provides positive stop control. It
also allows motorists to proceed once
the pedestrian has cleared their side
of the travel lane(s), reducing vehicle
delay.

Transportation agencies should refer
to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) for information on
the application of PHBs.

In general, PHBs are used where it
is difficult for pedestrians to cross
a roadway, such as when gaps in
traffic are not sufficient or speed
limits exceed 35 miles per hour.

They are very effective at locations
where three or more lanes will
be crossed or traffic volumes are
above 9,000 annual average daily
traffic. Installation of a PHB must
also include a marked crosswalk
and pedestrian countdown signal.

If PHBs are not already familiar to a
community, agencies should conduct
appropriate education and outreach
as part of implementation.

Example of PHBs mounted
on a mast arm. Source: FHWA
Sequence for a PHB. Source: MUTCD 2009 Edition, p. 511, FHWA 29%
reduction in total crashes.3
15%
reduction in fatal and
serious injury crashes.3
55%
reduction in
pedestrian crashes.2
Safety Benefits:

For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
ped_bike/step/resources/
docs/fhwasa18064.pdf.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-046
Road Diets
(Roadway Reconfiguration)
A Road Diet, or roadway reconfiguration, can improve safety, calm traffic, provide better mobility and access for all road users, and enhance overall quality of life. A Road Diet typically involves converting an existing four-lane undivided roadway to a three-lane roadway consisting of two through lanes and a center two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL).

Benefits of Road Diet installations
may include:
• Reduction of rear-end and left-turn
crashes due to the dedicated
left-turn lane.
• Reduced right-angle crashes as
side street motorists cross three
versus four travel lanes.
• Fewer lanes for pedestrians to cross.
• Opportunity to install pedestrian
refuge islands, bicycle lanes,
on-street parking, or transit stops.
• Traffic calming and more consistent
speeds.
• A more community-focused,
Complete Streets environment that
better accommodates the needs
of all road users.

A Road Diet can be a low-cost
safety solution when planned in
conjunction with a simple pavement
overlay, and the reconfiguration can
be accomplished at no additional
cost. Typically, a Road Diet is
implemented on a roadway with
a current and future average daily
traffic of 25,000 or less.
19-47%
reduction in total crashes.1
Road Diet project in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Source: Leidos
Road Diet Conversions
Safety Benefits:
4-Lane to 3-Lane
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
road_diets/.

BEFORE AFTER
Before and after example of a Road Diet. Source: FHWA
1 Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet” Measures on Crashes, FHWA-HRT-10-053, (2010).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-047
Walkways
A walkway is any type of defined space or pathway for use by a person traveling by foot or using a wheelchair. These may be pedestrian walkways, shared use paths, sidewalks, or roadway shoulders.

With more than 6,200 pedestrian
fatalities and 75,000 pedestrian
injuries occurring in roadway
crashes annually,
1 it is important for
transportation agencies to improve
conditions and safety for pedestrians
and to integrate walkways more
fully into the transportation system.

Research shows people living in low-
income communities are less likely
to encounter walkways and other
pedestrian-friendly features.
2 Well-designed pedestrian walkways,
shared use paths, and sidewalks
improve the safety and mobility of
pedestrians. Pedestrians should have
direct and connected network of
walking routes to desired destinations
without gaps or abrupt changes. In
some rural or suburban areas, where
these types of walkways are not
feasible, roadway shoulders provide
an area for pedestrians to walk next
to the roadway, although these are
not preferable.

Transportation agencies should work
towards incorporating pedestrian
facilities into all roadway projects
unless exceptional circumstances
exist. It is important to provide and
maintain accessible walkways along
both sides of the road in urban areas,
particularly near school zones and
transit locations, and where there is a
large amount of pedestrian activity.

Walkable shoulders should also be
considered along both sides of rural
highways when routinely used by
pedestrians.

Example of a sidewalk in a residential area.

Source: pedbikeimages.org / Burden
Paved shoulder used as a walkway. Source: pedbikeimages.org / Burden Safety Benefits:

Sidewalks
reduction in crashes involving
pedestrians walking along
roadways.3
65-89%
Paved Shoulders
reduction in crashes involving
pedestrians walking along
roadways.3
71%
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
http://www.pedbikesafe.org/
PEDSAFE/countermeasures_
detail.cfm?CM_NUM=1.
1 National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020, March). Pedestrians:
2018 data (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 850). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
2 Gibbs, et all. Income Disparities in Street Features that Encourage Walking.

Bridging the Gap, (2012, March).
3 Gan et al. Update of Florida Crash Reduction Factors and Countermeasures to Improve the Development of District Safety Improvement Projects. Florida DOT, (2005).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-048
Road Safety Audit
While most transportation agencies have established traditional safety review procedures, a road safety audit (RSA) or assessment is unique. RSAs are performed by a multidisciplinary team independent of the project. RSAs consider all road users, account for human factors and road user capabilities, are documented in a formal report, and require a formal response from the road owner. (See the eight steps for conducting an RSA below.) RSAs provide the following
benefits:
• Reduced number and severity of
crashes due to safer designs.
• Reduced costs resulting from early
identification and mitigation of
safety issues before projects are
built.
• Increased opportunities to integrate
multimodal safety strategies and
proven safety countermeasures.
• Expanded ability to consider
human factors in all facets of
design.
• Increased communication and
collaboration among safety
stakeholders.
• Objective review by independent
multidisciplinary team.

RSAs can be performed in any
phase of project development,
from planning through construction.

Agencies may focus RSAs
specifically on motorized vehicles,
pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists,
or a combination of these roadway
users. Agencies are encouraged
to conduct an RSA at the earliest
stage possible, as all roadway design
options and alternatives are being
explored.

Multidisciplinary team performs field review
during an RSA. Source: FHWA
10-60%
reduction in total crashes.1
Source: FHWA
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
rsa/.

Safety Benefits:
1 Road Safety Audits: An Evaluation of RSA Programs and Projects, FHWA-SA-12-037; and FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines, FHWA-SA-06-06.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Appropriate Speed
Limits for All Road Users
There is broad consensus among global roadway safety experts that speed control is one of the most important methods for reducing fatalities and serious injuries.

Speed is an especially important factor on non-limited access roadways where vehicles and vulnerable road users mix.

A driver may not see or be aware of the conditions within a corridor, and may drive at a speed that feels reasonable for themselves but may not be for all users of the system, especially vulnerable road users, including children and seniors. A driver traveling at 30 miles per hour who hits a pedestrian has a 45 percent chance of killing or seriously injuring them.
1 At 20 miles per hour, that percentage drops
to 5 percent.1 A number of cities across the United States, including New York, Washington, Seattle and Minneapolis, have reduced their local speed limits in recent years in an effort to reduce fatalities and serious injuries, with most having to secure State legislative authorization to do so.

States and local jurisdictions should set appropriate speed limits to reduce the significant risks drivers impose on others—especially vulnerable road users—and on themselves. Addressing speed is fundamental to the Safe System Approach to making streets safer, and a growing body of research shows that speed limit changes alone can lead to measurable declines in speeds and crashes. 2 Applications
Posted speed limits are often the same
as the legislative statutory speed limit.

Agencies with designated authorities to
set speed limits, which include States,
and sometimes local jurisdictions, can
establish non-statutory speed limits or
designate reduced speed zones, and
a growing number are doing so. While
non-statutory speed limits must be based
on an engineering study, conducted in
accordance with the
Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) involving
multiple factors and engineering
judgment, FHWA is also encouraging
agencies to use the following:
3 • Expert Systems tools.
o USLIMITS2.
o NCHRP 966: Posted Speed Limit
Setting Procedure and Tool.
• Safe System approach.

Based on international experience
and implementation in the United
States, the use of 20 mph speed zones
or speed limits in urban core areas
where vulnerable users share the road
environment with motorists may result in
further safety benefits.
4 Considerations
When setting a speed limit, agencies
should consider a range of factors such
as pedestrian and bicyclist activity, crash
history, land use context, intersection
spacing, driveway density, roadway
geometry, roadside conditions, roadway
functional classification, traffic volume,
and observed speeds.

To achieve desired speeds, agencies
often implement other speed
management strategies concurrently
with setting speed limits, such as self-
enforcing roadways, traffic calming,
and speed safety cameras. Additional
information is in the following FHWA
resources:
• FHWA Speed Management website.
• Self-Enforcing Roadways:

A Guidance Report.
• Noteworthy Speed
Management Practices.
• Jurisdiction Speed Management
Action Plan Development Package.
• Traffic Calming ePrimer.

FHWA-SA-21-034
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
speedmgt/ref_mats/.

Safety Benefits:

Traffic fatalities in the City
of Seattle decreased
26 percent after the
city implemented
comprehensive, city-wide
speed management
strategies and
countermeasures inspired
by Vision Zero. This included
setting speed limits on
all non-arterial streets at
20 mph and 200 miles of
arterial streets at 25 mph.5
One study found that
on rural roads, when
considering other relevant
factors in the engineering
study along with the speed
distribution, setting a speed
limit no more than 5 mph
below the 85th-percentile
speed may result in fewer
total and fatal plus injury
crashes, and lead to drivers
complying closely with the
posted speed limit.6
1 Reducing the speed limit to 20 mph in urban areas: Child deaths and injuries would be decreased. 2 Lowering the speed limit from 30 to 25 mph in Boston: effects on vehicle speeds. 3 FHWA’s Methods and Practices for Setting Speed Limits: An Informational Report, (2012). 4 Recommendations of the Academic Expert Group for the 3rd Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety.
5 https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/ref_mats/fhwasa20047/sec8.cfm#foot813 6 Safety and Operational Impacts of Setting Speed Limits below Engineering Recommendations.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Separated bicycle lane in Washington, DC.

Source: Alex Baca, Washington Area
Bicyclist Association
49%
for total crashes
on urban 4-lane undivided
collectors and local roads.6
FHWA-SA-21-051
Bicycle Lanes
Most fatal and serious injury bicyclist crashes occur at non-intersection locations.

Nearly one-third of these crashes involve overtaking motorists1; the speed and size differential between vehicles and bicycles can lead to severe injury. To make bicycling safer and more comfortable for most types of bicyclists, State and local agencies should consider installing bicycle lanes. These dedicated facilities for the use of bicyclists along the roadway can take several forms. Providing bicycle facilities can mitigate or prevent interactions, conflicts, and crashes between bicyclists and motor vehicles, and create a network of safer roadways for bicycling. Bicycle Lanes align with the Safe System Approach principle of recognizing human vulnerability—where separating users in space can enhance safety for all road users.

Applications
FHWA’s Bikeway Selection Guide and
Incorporating On-Road Bicycle Networks
into Resurfacing Projects assist agencies
in determining which facilities provide
the most benefit in various contexts.

Bicycle lanes can be included on
new roadways or created on existing
roads by reallocating space in the
right-of-way.

In addition to the paint stripe used
for a typical bicycle lane, a lateral
offset with painted buffer can help to
further separate bicyclists from vehicle
traffic. State and local agencies may
also consider physical separation
of the bicycle lane from motorized
traffic lanes through the use of
vertical elements like posts, curbs, or
vegetation.
2 Based on international
experience and implementation in
the United States, there is potential
for further safety benefits associated
with separated bicycle lanes. FHWA
is conducting research on separated
bicycle lanes, which includes the
development of crash modification
factors, to be completed in 2022 to
address significant interest on this topic.

Considerations
• City and State policies may require
minimum bicycle lane widths, although
these can differ by agency and
functional classification of the road.
• Bicycle lane design should
vary according to roadway
characteristics (e.g., motor vehicle
volumes and speed) in order to
maximize the facility’s suitability for
riders of all ages and abilities and
should consider the travel needs of
low-income populations likely to use
bicycles. The Bikeway Selection Guide
is a useful resource.
• While some in the public may
oppose travel lane narrowing if they
believe it will slow traffic or increase
congestion, studies have found that
roadways did not experience an
increase in injuries or congestion
when travel lane widths were
decreased to add a bicycle lane.
3 • Studies and experience in US cities
show that bicycle lanes increase
ridership and may help jurisdictions
better manage roadway capacity
without increased risk.
• In rural areas, rumble strips can
negatively impact bicyclists’ ability to
ride if not properly installed. Agencies
should consider the dimensions,
placement, and offset of rumble strips
when adding a bicycle lane.
4 • Strategies, practices, and processes
can be used by agencies to
enhance their ability to address
equity in bicycle planning and
design.
5 Bicycle Lane Additions can
reduce crashes up to:
30%
for total crashes on urban
2-lane undivided
collectors and local roads.6
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
ped_bike/tools_solve/docs/
fhwasa18077.pdf.

Safety Benefits:

Separated bicycle lanes may
provide further safety benefits.

FHWA is anticipating completion
of research in Fall 2022.
1 Thomas et al. Bicyclist Crash Types on National,
State, and Local Levels: A New Look. Transportation
Research Record 673(6), 664-676, (2019).
2 Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide.

FHWA-HEP-15-025, (2015).
3 Park and Abdel-Aty. “Evaluation of safety effective- ness of multiple cross sectional features on urban
arterials”. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 92,
pp. 245-255, (2016).
4 FHWA Tech Advisory Shoulder and Edge Line Rumble
Strips, (2011).
5 Sandt et al. Pursuing Equity in Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning. FHWA, (2016).
6 Avelar et al. Development of Crash Modification
Factors for Bicycle Lane Additions While Reducing
Lane and Shoulder Widths. FHWA, (2021).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
FHWA-SA-21-049
Crosswalk Visibility
Enhancements
Poor lighting conditions, obstructions such as parked cars, and horizontal or vertical roadway curvature can reduce visibility at crosswalks, contributing to safety issues. For multilane roadway crossings where vehicle volumes are in excess of 10,000 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT), a marked crosswalk alone is typically not sufficient. Under such conditions, more substantial crossing improvements could prevent an increase in pedestrian crash potential.

Three main crosswalk visibility enhancements help make crosswalks and the pedestrians, bicyclists, wheelchair and other mobility device users, and transit users using them more visible to drivers. These include high-visibility crosswalks, lighting, and signing and pavement markings. These enhancements can also assist users in deciding where to cross. Agencies can implement these features as standalone or combination enhancements to indicate the preferred location for users to cross.

High-visibility crosswalks
High-visibility crosswalks use patterns
(i.e., bar pairs, continental, ladder)
that are visible to both the driver
and pedestrian from farther
away compared to traditional
transverse line crosswalks. They
should be considered at all
midblock pedestrian crossings and
uncontrolled intersections. Agencies
should use materials such as inlay or
thermoplastic tape, instead of paint
or brick, for highly reflective crosswalk
markings.

Improved Lighting
The goal of crosswalk lighting
should be to illuminate with positive
contrast to make it easier for a driver
to visually identify the pedestrian.

This involves carefully placing the
luminaires in forward locations to
avoid a silhouette effect of the
pedestrian.

Enhanced Signing and
Pavement Markings
On multilane roadways, agencies
can use “YIELD Here to Pedestrians”
or “STOP Here for Pedestrians”
signs 20 to 50 feet in advance of
a marked crosswalk to indicate
where a driver should stop or yield to
pedestrians, depending on State law.

To supplement the signing, agencies
can also install a STOP or YIELD bar
(commonly referred to as “shark’s
teeth“) pavement markings.

In-street signing, such as “STOP Here
for Pedestrians” or “YIELD Here to
Pedestrians” may be appropriate on
roads with two- or three-lane roads
where speed limits are 30 miles per
hour or less.
40%
1 High-visibility crosswalks
can reduce pedestrian injury
crashes up to:
25%
3 Advance yield or stop
markings and signs can
reduce pedestrian
crashes up to:
42%
2 Intersection lighting can
reduce pedestrian crashes
up to:
1 Chen, L., C. Chen, and R. Ewing. The Relative Effectiveness of Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures at Urban Intersections - Lessons from a New York City Experience. (2012).
2 Elvik, R. and Vaa, T. Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Oxford, United Kingdom, Elsevier, (2004).
3 Zeeger et al. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments, FHWA, (2017).

Source: FHWA
W11-2, W16-7P
R1-6
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
ped_bike/step/docs/tech
Sheet_VizEnhancemt2018.pdf.

Safety Benefits:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
1 Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., “Handbook of Road Safety Measures.” Oxford, United Kingdom, Elsevier, (2004).

FHWA-SA-21-050
Lighting
The number of fatal crashes occurring in daylight is about the same as those that occur in darkness. However, the nighttime fatality rate is three times the daytime rate because only 25 percent of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) occur at night. At nighttime, vehicles traveling at higher speeds may not have the ability to stop once a hazard or change in the road ahead becomes visible by the headlights. Therefore, lighting can be applied continuously along segments and at spot locations such as intersections and pedestrian crossings in order to reduce the chances of a crash.

Adequate lighting (i.e., at or above minimum acceptable standards) is based on research recommending horizontal and vertical illuminance levels to provide safety benefits to all users of the roadway environment. Adequate lighting can also provide benefits in terms of personal security for pedestrians, wheelchair and other mobility device users, bicyclists, and transit users as they travel along and across roadways.

Applications
Roadway Segments
Research indicates that continuous
lighting on both rural and urban
highways (including freeways) has
an established safety benefit for
motorized vehicles.
1 Agencies can
provide adequate visibility of the
roadway and its users through the
uniform application of lighting that
provides full coverage along the
roadway and the strategic placement
of lighting where it is needed the most.

Intersections and Pedestrian
Crossings
Increased visibility at intersections at
nighttime is important since various
modes of travel cross paths at these
locations. Agencies should consider
providing lighting to intersections
based on factors such as a history of
crashes at nighttime, traffic volume,
the volume of non-motorized users,
the presence of crosswalks and raised
medians, and the presence of transit
stops and boarding volumes.

Considerations
Most new lighting installations are
made with breakaway features,
shielded, or placed far enough
from the roadway to reduce
the probability and/or severity
of fixed-object crashes. Modern
lighting technology gives precise
control with minimal excessive
light affecting the nighttime sky or
spilling over to adjacent properties.

Agencies can equitably engage
with underserved communities to
determine where and how new and
improved lighting can most benefit
the community by considering their
priorities, including eliminating crash
disparities, connecting to essential
neighborhood services, improving
active transportation routes, and
promoting personal safety.

Source: WSDOT
28%
for nighttime injury crashes
on rural and urban
highways.1
42%
for nighttime injury pedestrian
crashes at intersections.1
33-38%
for nighttime crashes at rural
and urban intersections.1
Source: FHWA
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/night_visib/
roadwayresources.cfm.

Safety Benefits:

Lighting can reduce
crashes up to:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Pavement Friction
Management
Friction is a critical characteristic of a pavement that affects how vehicles interact with the roadway, including the frequency of crashes. Measuring, monitoring, and maintaining pavement friction—especially at locations where vehicles are frequently turning, slowing, and stopping—can prevent many roadway departure, intersection, and pedestrian-related crashes.

Pavement friction treatments, such as High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST), can be better targeted and result in more efficient and effective installations when using continuous pavement friction data along with crash and roadway data.

Continuous Pavement Friction
Measurement
Friction data for safety performance
is best measured with Continuous
Pavement Friction Measurement
(CPFM) equipment. Spot friction
measurement devices, like locked-
wheel skid trailers, cannot safely and
accurately collect friction data in
curves or intersections, where the
pavement polishes more quickly and
adequate friction is so much more
critical. Without CPFM equipment,
agencies will assume the same
friction over a mile or more.

CPFM technology measures friction
continuously at highway speeds and
provides both network and segment
level data. Practitioners can analyze
the friction, crash, and roadway data
to better understand and predict
where friction-related crashes will
occur to better target locations and
more effectively install treatments.
1 High Friction Surface Treatment
HFST consists of a layer of durable,
anti-abrasion, and polish-resistant
aggregate over a thermosetting
polymer resin binder that locks the
aggregate in place to restore or
enhance friction and skid resistance.

Calcined bauxite is the aggregate
shown to yield the best results
and should be used with HFST
applications.

Applications
HFST should be applied in locations
with increased friction demand,
including:
• Horizontal curves.
• Interchange ramps.
• Intersection approaches.
o Higher-speed signalized and
stop-controlled intersections.
o Steep downward grades.
• Locations with a history of rear-end,
failure to yield, wet-weather, or red-
light-running crashes.
• Crosswalk approaches.

Considerations
• HFST is applied on existing pavement,
so no new pavement is added.
• If the underlying pavement
structure is unstable, then the
HFST life cycle may be shortened,
resulting in pre-mature failure.
• The automated installation method
is preferred as it minimizes issues
often associated with manual
installation: human error due to
fatigue, inadequate binder mixing,
improper and uneven binder
thickness, delayed aggregate
placement, and inadequate
aggregate coverage.
• The cost can be reduced when
bundling installations at multiple
locations.

FHWA-SA-21-052
Automated application of HFST.

Source: FHWA
HFST can reduce
crashes up to:
for injury crashes at ramps.2
63%
for injury crashes at
horizontal curves.2
48%
for total crashes at
intersections.3
20%
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/pavement_
friction/high_friction/.

Safety Benefits:
1 Izeppi et al. Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment as a Tool for Improving Crash Rate Prediction: A Pilot Study. Virginia Department of Transportation, (2016).
2 Merritt et al. Development of Crash Modification Factors for High Friction Surface Treatments. FHWA, (2020).
3 NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, (2008).

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
47%
for pedestrian crashes.4
98%
(varies by speed limit, number
of lanes, crossing distance,
and time of day).3
FHWA-SA-21-053
Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
A marked crosswalk or pedestrian warning sign can improve safety for pedestrians crossing the road, but at times may not be sufficient for drivers to visibly locate crossing locations and yield to pedestrians. To enhance pedestrian conspicuity and increase driver awareness at uncontrolled, marked crosswalks, transportation agencies can install a pedestrian actuated Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) to accompany a pedestrian warning sign. RRFBs consist of two, rectangular- shaped yellow indications, each with a light-emitting diode (LED)-array-based light source. 1 RRFBs flash with an alternating high frequency when activated to enhance conspicuity of pedestrians at the crossing to drivers.

For more information on using RRFBs, see the Interim Approval in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
1 1 MUTCD Interim Approval 21 - RRFBs at Crosswalks.
2 “Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon” in PEDSAFE: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System. FHWA, (2013).
3 Fitzpatrick et al. “Will You Stop for Me? Roadway Design and Traffic Control Device Influences on Drivers Yielding to Pedestrians in a Crosswalk with a Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon.” Report No. TTI-CTS-0010. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, (2016).
4 NCHRP Research Report 841 Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments, (2017).

Applications
The RRFB is applicable to many
types of pedestrian crossings but is
particularly effective at multilane
crossings with speed limits less
than 40 miles per hour.
2 Research
suggests RRFBs can result in motorist
yielding rates as high at 98 percent
at marked crosswalks, but varies
depending on the location, posted
speed limit, pedestrian crossing
distance, one- versus two-way road,
and the number of travel lanes.
3 RRFBs can also accompany school or
trail crossing warning signs.

RRFBs are placed on both sides of
a crosswalk below the pedestrian
crossing sign and above the
diagonal downward arrow plaque
pointing at the crossing.
1 The flashing
pattern can be activated with
pushbuttons or passive (e.g., video or
infrared) pedestrian detection, and
should be unlit when not activated.

Considerations
Agencies should:
2 • Install RRFBs in the median rather
than the far-side of the roadway
if there is a pedestrian refuge or
other type of median.
• Use solar-power panels to eliminate
the need for a power source.
• Reserve the use of RRFBs for
locations with significant pedestrian
safety issues, as over-use of RRFB
treatments may diminish their
effectiveness.

Agencies shall not:
2 • Use RRFBs without the presence of
a pedestrian, school or trail crossing
warning sign.
• Use RRFBs for crosswalks across
approaches controlled by YIELD
signs, STOP signs, traffic control
signals, or pedestrian hybrid
beacons, except for the approach
or egress from a roundabout.

RRFBs used at a trail crossing.

Source: LJB
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safe-
ty Countermeasures, please
visit https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/provencountermeasures/
and https://safety.fhwa.dot.
gov/ped_bike/step/docs/
techSheet_RRFB_2018.pdf.

Safety Benefits:

RRFBs can reduce
crashes up to:

RRFBs can increase motorist
yielding rates up to:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Speed
Safety Cameras
Safe Speeds is a core principle of the Safe System Approach since humans are less likely to survive high-speed crashes. Enforcing safe speeds has been challenging; however, with more information and tools communities can make progress in reducing speeds. Agencies can use speed safety cameras (SSCs) as an effective and reliable technology to supplement more traditional methods of enforcement, engineering measures, and education to alter the social norms of speeding. SSCs use speed measurement devices to detect speeding and capture photographic or video evidence of vehicles that are violating a set speed threshold.

Applications
Agencies should conduct a network
analysis of speeding-related crashes
to identify locations to implement
SSCs. The analysis can include scope
(e.g., widespread, localized), location
types (e.g., urban/suburban/rural,
work zones, residential, school zones),
roadway types (e.g., expressways,
arterials, local streets), times of day, and
road users most affected by speed-
related crashes (e.g., pedestrians,
bicyclists).

SSCs can be deployed as:
• Fixed units—a single, stationary
camera targeting one location.
• Point-to-Point (P2P) units—multiple
cameras to capture average speed
over a certain distance.
• Mobile units—a portable camera,
generally in a vehicle or trailer.

The table below describes suitable
circumstances for SSC deployment.
1 Considerations
• SSCs can produce a crash reduction
upstream and downstream, thus
generating a spillover effect.2
• Public trust is essential for any type of
enforcement. With proper controls in
place, SSCs can offer fair and
equitable enforcement of speeding,
regardless of driver age, race, gender,
or socio-economic status. SSCs should
be planned with community input and
equity impacts in mind.
• Using both overt (i.e., highly visible)
and covert (i.e., hidden) enforcement
may encourage drivers to comply with
limits everywhere, not only at sites they
are aware are enforced.
• Agencies should conduct
evaluations regularly to determine if
SSCs are accomplishing safety goals
and whether changes in strategy,
scheduling, communications, or public
engagement are necessary.
• Agencies should conduct a legal
and policy review to determine if SSCs
are authorized within a jurisdiction and
how the authorization and other traffic
laws will affect a SSC program.
• Agencies should develop an SSC
program plan with consideration of
the USDOT SSC guidelines for planning,
public involvement, stakeholder
coordination, implementation,
maintenance, evaluation, etc.
3 FHWA-SA-21-070
Fixed units can reduce
crashes on urban
principal arterials up to:
for all
crashes.454%
for injury
crashes.
447%
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
speedmgt/.

Safety Benefits:

Considerations for Selection Fixed P2P Mobile
Problems are long-term and site-specific. X X —
Problems are network-wide, and shift based on enforcement efforts. — — X Speeds at enforcement site vary largely from downstream sites. — X X Overt enforcement is legally required. X X X
Sight distance for the enforcement unit is limited. X X — Enforcement sites are multilane facilities. X X —
1 Thomas et al. Speed Safety Camera Program Planning and Operations Guide. FHWA, (2021). 2 Montella et al. “Effects on speed and safety of point-to-point speed enforcement systems”.

Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 75, (2015). Note that this is an international study. 3 Speed Enforcement Camera Systems Operational Guidelines. NHTSA, (2008). 4 Shin et al. “Evaluation of the Scottsdale Loop 101 automated speed enforcement demonstration program.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, (2009). 5 Li et al. “A Before-and-After Empirical Bayes Evaluation of Automated Mobile Speed Enforcement on Urban Arterial Roads.” Presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper No. 15-1563, Washington, D.C., (2015).

Note that this is an international study.
6 Automated Speed Enforcement Program Report 2014-2017. New York City DOT, (2018).

In New York City, fixed units
reduced speeding in school
zones up to 63% during
school hours.6
P2P units can reduce crashes on
urban expressways, freeways,
and principal arterials up to:
for fatal and injury crashes.2
37%
Mobile units can reduce
crashes on urban principal
arterials up to:
for fatal and injury crashes.5
20%
The contents of this Fact Sheet do not have the
force and effect of law and are not meant to
bind the public in any way. This Fact Sheet is
intended only to provide clarity regarding existing
requirements under the law or agency policies.

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
Variable Speed
Limits
Selecting appropriate speed limits on roadways is important in maintaining a safe and efficient transportation network. Speed limits are established with an engineering study based on inputs like traffic volumes, operating speeds, roadway characteristics, and crash history. However, conditions on the roadway are susceptible to change in a short amount of time (e.g., congestion, crashes, weather). Drivers typically determine their operating speeds under normal weather conditions on a straight roadway section with good pavement quality and adequate sight distances. If ideal conditions do not exist and the roadway does not meet the driver’s expectations, there is a greater chance that a driver error could result in a crash. Providing variable speeds limits (VSLs) capable of adapting to changing circumstances could reduce crash frequency and severity.

Speed management strategies, including VSLs, are integral to the Safe Speeds element of the Safe System Approach. Because humans are unlikely to survive high-speed crashes, VSLs reduce speeds so that human injury tolerances are accommodated in three ways: improving visibility, providing additional time for drivers to stop, and reducing impact forces.

Applications
VSLs use prevailing information on the
roadway, like traffic speed, volumes,
weather, and road surface conditions,
to determine appropriate speeds
and display them to drivers. This
strategy improves safety performance
and traffic flow by reducing speed
variance (i.e., improving speed
harmonization). VSLs may also improve
driver expectation by providing
information in advance of slowdowns
and potential lane closures, which
could reduce the probability for
secondary crashes. VSLs can mitigate
adverse weather conditions or to slow
faster-moving traffic as it approaches
a queue or bottleneck.

Agencies can implement VSLs for
the following applications:

CONGESTION INCIDENTS

WORK ZONES INCLEMENT WEATHER
Considerations
• Particularly effective on urban and
rural freeways and high-speed arterials
with posted speed limits greater than
40 mph.
• Often implemented as part of Active
Traffic Management (ATM) plans
or incorporated into existing Road
Weather Information Systems.
• When used with ATM, VSLs can
mitigate rear-end, sideswipe,
and other crashes on high-speed
roadways.
• May be implemented as a regulatory
and/or an advisory system.
• Can be applied to an entire roadway
segment or individual lanes.

Source: WSDOT
34%
for total crashes.1
65%
for rear-end crashes.1
51%
for fatal and injury crashes.1
1 Avelar et al. Developing Crash Modification Factors for Variable Speed Limit. FHWA, (2020).
9:1- 40:1
Benefit/Cost Ratios
range between1
FHWA-SA-21-054
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
speedmgt/ref_mats/.

Safety Benefits:

VSLs can reduce crashes
on freeways up to:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
37%
for non-intersection, fatal
and injury crashes on rural,
two-lane roads.2
FHWA-SA-21-055
Wider Edge Lines
Roadway departures account for over half of all traffic fatalities in the United States. If drivers cannot clearly identify the edge of the travel lanes and see the road alignment ahead, the risk of roadway departure may be greater.

Wider edge lines enhance the visibility of travel lane boundaries compared to traditional edge lines. Edge lines are considered “wider” when the marking width is increased from the minimum normal line width of 4 inches to the maximum normal line width of 6 inches.
1 Applications
Wider edge lines increase drivers’
perception of the edge of the
travel lane and can provide a
safety benefit to all facility types
(e.g., freeways, multilane divided
and undivided highways, two-lane
highways) in both urban and rural
areas.
2 Wider edge lines are most
effective in reducing crashes on
rural two-lane highways, especially
for single-vehicle crashes.
3 Agencies
should also consider implementing
a systemic approach to wider edge
line installation based roadway
departure crash risk factors. Potential
risk factors for two-lane rural roads
include:
• Pavement and shoulder widths.
• Presence of curves.
• Traffic volumes.
• History of nighttime crashes.

Considerations
• Wider edge lines are relatively
low cost.
• Wider edge lines can be
implemented using existing
equipment during maintenance
procedures like re-striping and
resurfacing, with the only cost
increase being the additional
material.
• Paint may have a lower initial cost,
but more durable materials (e.g.,
thermoplastic) may result in a
lower life cycle cost based on their
longer service life.
• As the number of automated
vehicles increases on roadways,
wider edge lines may provide
better guidance for these
vehicles’ sensors.

Source: Texas Transportation Institute
22%
for fatal and injury crashes
on rural freeways.3
1 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Section 3A.06. FHWA, (2009). 2 Park et al. “Safety effects of wider edge lines on rural, two-lane highways. ” Accident Analysis and Prevention
Vol. 48, pp.317-325, (2012).
3 Potts et al. Benefit/Cost Evaluation of MoDOT’s Total Striping and Delineation Program: Phase II. Missouri Department of Transportation, (2011). 4 Abdel-Rahim et al. Safety Impacts of Using Wider Pavement Markings on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Idaho. Idaho Transportation Department, (2018). 25:1
Benefit Cost Ratio
for fatal and serious injury
crashes on two-lane rural
roads.4
For more information on this
and other FHWA Proven Safety
Countermeasures, please visit
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
provencountermeasures/ and
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
roadway_dept/night_visib/
pavement-markings.cfm.

Wider edge lines can
reduce crashes up to:

Safety Benefits:

OFFICE OF SAFETY
Proven Safety
Countermeasures
City of Jurupa Valley
Local Roadway Safety Plan

Appendix D: Jurupa Valley Capital Improvement Program List

FISCAL YEAR 2021/22—2025/26

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
Transmittal Message..………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Resolution of the City Council……………………………………………………………………..……………… 3

SUMMARIES
Project Summary with Revenue Source…………………………………………………………………….. 5 Funding Summary………………………………….…………………………………………………………………. 9

PROJECTS
Market St. Bridge, Crossing Santa Ana River…………………………………………………………………. 13-H.1 Mission Blvd. Bridge, Crossing Santa Ana River……………………………………………………………. 13-H.2 Bain St. Pavement Rehabilitation, Limonite to Bellegrave……….…………….……………………… 16-A.2 Traffic Signal Installation, Pedley and Jurupa……….…………….………….…………….………………. 16-C.2 Certificates of Participation (COP) Series 2016A – Debt Service……….…………….…………….. 16-F Van Buren Blvd. Widening, Santa Ana River to Limonite……….…………….…………………….…. 17-B.1 Limonite Ave. Widening, Bain to Homestead……….…………….………….…………….…………….… 17-B.2 Rubidoux Blvd./SR60 Interchange Improvements……….…………….………….……………………… 17-B.3 Jurupa Rd./Van Buren Blvd. Grade Separation……….…………….………….…………….…………….. 17-B.5 Mission Blvd. and Valley Way Intersection Improvements……….…………….………….………… 18-C.1 Granite Hill Dr. Pavement Rehabilitation, Pyrite to Edgewood Point…………………………….. 19103 Pacific Ave. SR2S Sidewalk Project, Mission to 45th……….…………….………….…………….……… 19106 Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure……………………………………………………………….. 19107 Market St. Widening, Santa Ana River to Rubidoux……….…………….………….…………….….…. 19108 Mission Blvd. and Rubidoux Blvd. Intersection Improvements……….…………….………….…... 19109 Master Plan of Streets………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 19110 Traffic Signal Installation, Ben Nevis and Pedley…………………………………………………………… 19111 Citywide Guardrail Replacement…………………………………………………………………………………… 19112 2020-2021 CDBG – Mission Blvd. ADA Improvements, Ben Nevis to Valley Way….……….. 20102 Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 1, Pyrite to Valley Way……..…………………….. 20103

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT’D
2020-2021 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD…………………………………………….. 20106 2020-2021 CDBG – Pacific Ave. Street Improvement Project, Mission to SR60……………. 20107 Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)……………………………………………………………………………………….. 20108 2021-2022 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Rubidoux Blvd. – SR60 to 29th, Limonite Ave. – Felspar to Pedley, Jurupa Rd. – Agate to Galena……………………………………………….. 21101
2021-2022 CDBG – Old Mira Loma Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 1, 50th, 48th, Martin, Troth, Marlatt, Dodd………………………………………………………………………………………………...…..

21102
Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 2, Bellegrave to Pyrite…………….……….…….. 21103 2021-2022 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD…………………………….……..………… 21104 2021-2022 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD….……………………………………………………. 21105 Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd. Gap Closure………………………………………………………………………... 21106 Bellegrave Ave. Widening, Cantu Galleano Ranch to Van Buren…………………………………… 21107 Riverside Dr. Widening – I-15 to Wineville…………………………………………………………………… 21108 2021-2022 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locatiosn TBD…………………………………………………………….. 21109 Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 3, Ben Nevis to Bellegrave…………………….. 21110 Van Buren Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 3, Bellegrave to Etiwanda…………………… 21111 Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Safety Upgrades…………………………………………… 21112 Mission Blvd. Street Improvements, Pyrite to Roughly 1,300’ East………………………………. 21113 2022-2023 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………………………………………………….. 22101 2022-2023 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………………………………. 22102 2022-2023 CDBG – Old Mira Loma Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 2, 58th, 56th, 54th, Ridgeview, Troth, Marlatt, Dodd……………………………………………………………………………………

22103
2022-2023 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 22104 2022-2023 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD……………………………………………………….. 22105 Sierra Ave, Armstrong to City Limits and /or Armstrong Rd, Sierra to City Limits Roundabout Study and Installation……………………………………………………………………………….

22106
2023-2024 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………..……………………………………….. 23101 2023-2024 CDBG – Glen Avon Area Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………. 23102 2023-2024 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 23103 2023-2024 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD………………………………………………………. 23104 2023-2024 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD……………………………………… 23105 2024-2025 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………………………………………………….. 24101

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT’D

2024-2025 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………………………………. 24102 2024-2025 CDBG – Country Village Rd. Pavement Rehabilitation, Granite Hill to San Sevaine Channel……………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. 24103
2024-2025 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 24104 2024-2025 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD………………………………………………………. 24105 2025-2026 Citywide Slurry Seal, Locations TBD…………………………………………………………….. 25101 2025-2026 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Locations TBD………………………………………. 25102 2025-2026 CDBG – San Sevaine Way Pavement Rehabilitation, Etiwanda to Mission…... 25103 2025-2026 Misc. Traffic Signal Upgrades, Locations TBD……………………………………………… 25104 2025-2026 Misc. Drainage Repairs, Locations TBD………………………………………………………. 25105 Valley Way and Jurupa Rd. Realignment………………………………………………………………………. TBD 58th St. Gap Closure……………………………………………………………………………………………………… TBD Camino Real Widening/Intersection Improvements, Jurupa Rd. to 700’ South…………….. TBD Daly Ave. Storm Drain Improvements………………………………………………………………………….. TBD Pacific Ave. Storm Drain Improvements……………………………………………………………………….. TBD

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026
1 TRANSMITTAL MESSAGE

Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and Residents of Jurupa Valley:

On behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley staff I am proud to transmit the FY 202 1-2022 to FY 2025- 2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This document is the result of several internal review meetings and previous City Council direction. All projects presented in this budget have been carefully examined to ensure the community’s capital improvement needs are met both now and in the future. You w ill find this CIP has been developed with a balance between the infrastructure needs of the community and the City’s financial capacity.

The CIP is a five-year planning instrument used to identify and coordinate the financing and timing of public improvem ents. The first year of this program is the capital budget you will see in the City’s overall operating budget. Projects slated for subsequent years in the program are for planning purposes only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are alloc ated funding in a future capital budget.

The City’s goal in providing a CIP budget is to develop a multi -year plan for capital improvement, update it annually and follow through with all capital improvements in accordance with the plan. In determining the relative merit of a proposed project, key management team members evaluate projects for feasibility, community enhancement, infrastructure preservation and safety.

City staff identifie d the community’s capital needs for each fiscal year, evaluated antici pated funding availability and presents a proposed CIP for the City Council’s consideration and direction to staff. The focus of the CIP is to combine a comprehensive planning document that identifies revenues with the capital projects expenditure budget. The document also augments the existing capital projects budget information and facilitates the long -range capital projects planning process.

The CIP includes a total of $ 127,597,526 in identified capital projects, with available funding of $64,398,726. There is $ 63,198,800 in “Unspecified” project funding , indicating that a revenue source has not been identified for these projects. There are 35 projects which are scheduled to begin design, construction and/or be completed in FY 2021-2022. These projects are intended to enhance the safety and quality of life for all citizens in the City of Jurupa Valley. The following is a list of some highlighted projects contained in the CIP:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026
2 • Van Buren Blvd. Widening, Santa Ana River to Limonite • Jurupa Rd. and Van Buren Blvd. Grade Separation
• Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure
• Market St. Widening, Santa Ana River to Rubidoux
• Citywide Guardrail Replacement
• Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation – Ph. 1 and 2, Bellegrave to Valley Way • Riverside Dr. Widening, I-15 to Wineville

The revenue estimates, although conservative, are strictly estimates. The actual amount of funds available for construction will vary based upon the state of the economy. The City Council will be updated throughout the year on the status of projects and co rresponding revenue sources.

The FY 202 1-2022 to FY 202 5-2026 Capital Improvement Program is a result of a total team effort of both City staff and City Council. I would like to thank staff and the City Council for all of the contributions that were made in developing the capital budget that will serve as the blueprint for Jurupa Valley’s future.

Sincerely,

Rod Butler
City Manager

PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
13-H.1 MARKET ST. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVER TUMF $ 502,200 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2 ,750,000 $ 2,704,198 $ - $ 7,956,398 13-H.2 MISSION BLVD. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVER Measure 'A' $ 566,621 $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 831,621 Measure 'A' $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135,000 Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - RMRA $ 73,537 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 73,537 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ 650,000 TOTAL $ 208,537 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ 858,537 16-C.2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, PEDLEY AND JURUPA DIF (Signals) $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 16-F CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) SERIES 2016A - DEBT SERVICE Measure 'A' $ - $ 1, 057,800 $ 1,060,000 $ 1,0 55,800 $ 1,059,250 $ 2,11 9,000 $ 6,351,850 TUMF $ - $ 5,525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,525,000 DIF (Trans.) $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 TOTAL $ 150,000 $ 5, 525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,675,000 TUMF $ - $ 400,000 $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 DIF (Trans.) $ 99,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 99,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500, 000 $ 7,500,000 TOTAL $ 99,000 $ 400,000 $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 8,849,0 00 DIF (Rialto) $ 183,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 183,000 TUMF $ - $ 617,000 $ - $ 1,542,914 $ - $ - $ 2,159,914 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000,0 00 $ 40,000,000 TOTAL $ 183,000 $ 617,000 $ - $ 1,542,914 $ - $ 40,000,000 $ 42,342,914 17-B.5 JURUPA RD. AND VAN BUREN BLVD. GRADE SEPARATION SB 132 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 18-C.1 MISSION BLVD. AND VALLEY WAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS DIF (Signals) $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 19103 GRANITE HILL DR. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, PYRITE TO EDGEWOOD POINT RMRA $ 445,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 445,000 CDBG $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 67 0,000 $ 670,000 TOTAL $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 670,000 $ 730,000 ATP $ 312,000 $ 2,46 6,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,778,000 Measure 'A' $ 34,500 $ 274,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 308,500 TOTAL $ 346,500 $ 2, 740,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,086,500 19108 MARKET ST. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO RUBIDOUX TUMF $ 140,000 $ 566,000 $ 3,417,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,123,00 0 19107
SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE
19106

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
16-A.2
BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BELLEGRAVE
17-B.3
RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
17-B.1
VAN BUREN BLVD. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO LIMONITE
17-B.2
LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD
PACIFIC AVE. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS, 42ND TO MISSION 5 PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
19109 MISSION BLVD. AND RUBIDOUX BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS DIF (Signals) $ 189,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 189,000 DIF (Trans.) $ 77,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77,500 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 77,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77,500 19111 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, BEN NEVIS AND PEDLEY DIF (Signals) $ 322,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 322,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Gas Tax $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 HSIP $ - $ 509,200 $ - $ - $ - $ 509,200 TOTAL $ - $ 574,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 574,200 20102 2020-2021 CDBG - MISSION BLVD. ADA IMPROVEMENTS, BEN NEVIS TO VALLEY WAY CDBG $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 RMRA $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 Measure 'A' $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 TOTAL $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 20106 2020-2021 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 20107 2020-2021 CDBG - PACIFIC AVE.STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, MISSION TO SR60 CDBG $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 LRSP $ 36,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,000 Measure 'A' $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000 TOTAL $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 RMRA $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 TOTAL $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 21102 2021-2022 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, 50TH, 48TH, MARTIN, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD CDBG $ - $ 946,406 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 946,406 RMRA $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 TOTAL $ - $ 1,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,700,000 21104 2021-2022 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 21105 2021-2022 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 TUMF $ - $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 76,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60 0,000 $ 600,000 $ - $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 676,000 2021-2022 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, RUBIDOUX BLVD. - SR60 TO 29TH, LIMONITE AVE. - FELSPAR TO PEDLEY, JURUPA RD. - AGATE TO GALENA 21101
20103
MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, PYRITE TO VALLEY WAY 21103
MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, BELLEGRAVE TO PYRITE 21106
CANTU GALLEANO RANCH RD. GAP CLOSURE
20108

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

MASTER PLAN OF STREETS
19112

CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT
19110
6 PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
TUMF $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 140,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 67 5,000 $ 675,000 $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 675,000 $ 815,000 21108 RIVERSIDE DR. WIDENING - I-15 TO WINEVILLE MLRBBD $ - $ 1, 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 21109 2021-2022 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 80,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000 TOTAL $ - $ 80,000 $ 1,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,880,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 TOTAL $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ 2,100,000 $ - $ - $ 2,190,000 HSIP $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 Unspecified $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 TOTAL $ - $ 250,000 $ 4,457,600 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,707,600 21113 MISSION BLVD. STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PYRITE TO ROUGHLY 1,300' EAST Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000, 000 $ 2,000,000 22101 2022-2023 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ 70 0,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 CDBG $ - $ - $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 850,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 950,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 950,000 22104 2022-2023 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 22105 2022-2023 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Gas Tax $ - $ - $ 100,00 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 350,000 23101 2023-2024 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 23102 2023-2024 CDBG - GLEN AVON AREA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD CDBG $ - $ - $ - $ 875,000 $ - $ - $ 875,000 21111
VAN BUREN BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 3, BELLEGRAVE TO ETIWANDA 22106

SIERRA AVE, ARMSTRONG TO CITY LIMITS AND/OR ARMSTRONG RD, SIERRA TO CITY

LIMITS ROUNDABOUT STUDY AND INSTALLATION
22103
2022-2023 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, 58TH, 56TH, 54TH, RIDGEVIEW, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD
21110
MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 3, BEN NEVIS TO BELLEGRAVE 21107
BELLEGRAVE AVE. WIDENING - CANTU GALLEANO RANCH TO VAN BUREN 22102
2022-2023 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 21112

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SAFETY UPGRADES 7 PROJECT

NUMBER PROJECT NAME SOURCE OF
FUNDS

PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

PROJECT SUMMARY
23103 2023-2024 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 23104 2023-2024 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 23105 2023-2024 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 24101 2024-2025 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,150,000 $ - $ 2,150,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,050,000 $ - $ 3,050,000 24103 2024-2025 CDBG - COUNTRY VILLAGE RD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, GRANITE HILL TO SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL CDBG $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 24104 2024-2025 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 24105 2024-2025 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 25101 2025-2026 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Measure 'A' $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90 0,000 $ 900,000 RMRA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,100,000 $ 3,100,000 25103 2025-2026 CDBG - SAN SEVAINE WAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, ETIWANDA TO MISSION CDBG $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 925,000 $ 925,000 25104 2025-2026 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCATIONS TBD DIF (Signals) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 25105 2025-2026 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TBD Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 TBD VALLEY WAY AND JURUPA RD. REALIGNMENT Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD 58TH ST. GAP CLOSURE Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD CAMINO REAL WIDENING/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, JURUPA RD. TO 700' SOUTH Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 TBD DALY AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD PACIFIC AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Unspecified $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 TOTAL 5,659,358 $ 19,227,406 $ 16,684,600 $ 10,173,714 $ 8,413,448 $ 67,439,000 $ 127,597,526 $ 24102
2024-2025 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 25102
2025-2026 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD 8 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE
19107 SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE $ 312,000 $ 2,466,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,778,000 $ 312,000 $ 2,466,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,778,000 19106 PACIFIC AVE. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMEN TS, 42ND TO MISSION $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 20102 2020-2021 CDBG - MISSION BLVD. ADA IMPROVEMENT S, BEN NEVIS TO VALLEY WAY $ 25,0 00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 20107 2020-2021 CDBG - PACIFIC AVE. STREET IMPROVEME NT PROJECT, MISSION TO SR60 $ 450,00 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450,000 21102 2021-2022 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, 50TH, 48TH, MARTIN, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD $ - $ 946,406 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 946,406 22103 2022-2023 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, 58TH, 56TH, 54TH, RIDGEVIEW, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD $ - $ - $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 850,000 23102 2023-2024 CDBG - GLEN AVON AREA PAVEMENT REHAB ILITATION, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 875,000 $ - $ - $ 875,000 24103 2024-2025 CDBG - COUNTRY VILLAGE RD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, GRANITE HILL TO SAN SEVAINE CHANNEL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 25103 2025-2026 CDBG - SAN SEVAINE WAY PAVEMENT REHA BILITATION, ETIWANDA TO MISSION $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 925,000 $ 925,000 $ 535,000 $ 946,406 $ 850,000 $ 875,00 0 $ 900,000 $ 925,0 00 $ 5,031,406 17-B.3 RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEME NTS $ 183,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 183,000 $ 183,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 183,000 16-C.2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, PEDLEY AND JURUP A $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 20,000 18-C.1 MISSION BLVD. AND VALLEY WAY INTERSECTION IMP ROVEMENTS $ 155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,000 19109 MISSION BLVD. AND RUBIDOUX BLVD. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $ 189,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 189,000 19111 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION, BEN NEVIS AND PED LEY $ 322,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 322,000 20106 2020-2021 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 21104 2021-2022 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 22104 2022-2023 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 23103 2023-2024 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 24104 2024-2025 MISC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES, LOCAT IONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 25104 2025-2026 MISC. TRAFFIC SINAL UPGRADES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 866,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,00 0 $ 250,000 $ 250,0 00 $ 2,116,000 17-B.1 VAN BUREN BLVD. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO LIMONITE $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 17-B.2 LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD $ 99,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 99,000 19110 MASTER PLAN OF STREETS $ 77,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77,500 $ 326,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 326,500

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - SIGNALS

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - RIALTO SETTLEMENT

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
9 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY
16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 19112 CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT $ - $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65,000 21105 2021-2022 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 22105 2022-2023 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 22106 SIERRA AVE, ARMSTRONG TO CITY LIMITS AND/OR ARMSTRONG RD, SIERRA TO CITY LIMITS ROUNDABOUT STUDY AND INSTALLATION $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 23104 2023-2024 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 24105 2024-2025 MISC. DRAINAGE REPAIRS, LOCATIONS TB D $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 25105 2025-2026 MISC. DRAINAGE REPARS, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 215,000 $ 250,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 915,000 19112 CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT $ - $ 509,200 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 509,200 21112 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SAFET Y UPGRADES $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 $ - $ 634,200 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,863,000 20108 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) $ 36,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,000 13-H.2 MISSION BLVD. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVE R $ 566,621 $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 831,621 16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 135,000 16-F CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) SERIES 2016 A - DEBT SERVICE $ - $ 1,057,800 $ 1,060,000 $ 1,0 55,800 $ 1,059,250 $ 2,11 9,000 $ 6,351,850 19107 SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE $ 34,500 $ 274,0 00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 308,500 19112 CITYWIDE GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 20103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, PYRITE TO VALLEY WAY $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 20108 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000 21101 2021-2022 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, RUBIDOUX BLVD. - SR60 TO 29TH, LIMONITE AVE. - FELSPAR TO PEDLEY, JURUPA RD. - AGATE TO GALENA $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 21103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.2, BELLEGRAVE TO PYRITE $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 21109 2021-2022 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 21110 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3, BEN NEVIS TO BELLEGRAVE $ - $ 80,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000 21111 VAN BUREN BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3 , BELLEGRAVE TO ETIWANDA $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 22101 2022-2023 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 22102 2022-2023 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 23101 2023-2024 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000

GAS TAX

HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)

MEASURE 'A'

LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
10 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY
23105 2023-2024 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 24101 2024-2025 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 24102 2024-2025 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 25101 2025-2026 CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL, LOCATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 25102 2025-2026 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ 900,000 $ 940,121 $ 2,916,800 $ 2,460,000 $ 2,255,800 $ 2,259,250 $ 3,319,000 $ 14,150,971 21108 RIVERSIDE DR. WIDENING - I-15 TO WINEVILLE $ - $ 1,850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 $ - $ 1,850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ 73,537 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 73,537 19103 GRANITE HILL DR. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, PYRI TE TO EDGEWOOD POINT $ 445,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 445,000 20103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 1, PYRITE TO VALLEY WAY $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300,000 21101 2021-2022 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, RUBIDOUX BLVD. - SR60 TO 29TH, LIMONITE AVE. - FELSPAR TO PEDLEY, JURUPA RD. - AGATE TO GALENA $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 21111 VAN BUREN BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3 , BELLEGRAVE TO ETIWANDA $ - $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 21103 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, BELLEGRAVE TO PYRITE $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 21110 MISSION BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH.3, BEN NEVIS TO BELLEGRAVE $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 22102 2022-2023 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 22103 2022-2023 CDBG - OLD MIRA LOMA PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - PH. 2, 58TH, 56TH, 54TH, RIDGEVIEW, TROTH, MARLATT, DODD $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 24102 2024-2025 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,150,000 $ - $ 2,150,000 25102 2025-2026 CITYWIDE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LO CATIONS TBD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 1,818,537 $ 2,400,000 $ 2,050,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,150,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 12,718,537 17-B.5 JURUPA RD. AND VAN BUREN BLVD. GRADE SEPARATI ON $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 13-H.1 MARKET ST. BRIDGE, CROSSING SANTA ANA RIVER $ 502,200 $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2, 750,000 $ 2,704,198 $ - $ 7,956,398 17-B.1 VAN BUREN BLVD. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO LIMONITE $ - $ 5,525,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,525,000 17-B.2 LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD $ - $ 400,000 $ 850,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1 ,250,000 17-B.3 RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEME NTS $ - $ 617,000 $ - $ 1,542,914 $ - $ - $ 2,159,914 19108 MARKET ST. WIDENING, SANTA ANA RIVER TO RUBIDO UX $ 140,000 $ 566,000 $ 3,417,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,123,000 21106 CANTU GALLEANO RANCH RD. GAP CLOSURE $ - $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 76,000 21107 BELLEGRAVE AVE. WIDENING, CANTU GALLEANO RANCH TO VAN BUREN $ - $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 140,000 $ 642,200 $ 7,324,000 $ 6,267,000 $ 4,292,914 $ 2,704,198 $ - $ 21,230,312

ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA)
SENATE BILL 132
TUMF

MIRA LOMA RBBD (MLRBBD)
11 PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PROJECTED

CARRYOVER
21/22

PROJECTED
22/23

PROJECTED
23/24

PROJECTED
24/25

PROJECTED
25/26

PROJECTED AND

FUTURE YEARS

COST TO

COMPLETE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2021-2022 TO FY 2025-2026

FUNDING SUMMARY
16-A.2 BAIN ST. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, 54TH TO BEL LEGRAVE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ 650,000 17-B.2 LIMONITE AVE. WIDENING, BAIN TO HOMESTEAD $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 17-B.3 RUBIDOUX BLVD. AND SR60 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEME NTS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000,000 $ 40,000,000 19106 PACIFIC AVE. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMEN TS, 42ND TO MISSION $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 670,000 $ 670,000 19110 MASTER PLAN OF STREETS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 21106 CANTU GALLEANO RANCH RD. GAP CLOSURE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 600,000 21107 BELLEGRAVE AVE. WIDENING, CANTU GALLEANO RANCH TO VAN BUREN $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 675,000 $ 675,000 21112 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SAFET Y UPGRADES $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,353,800 21113 MISSION BLVD. STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PYRITE TO R OUGHLY 1,300' EAST $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 22106 SIERRA AVE, ARMSTRONG TO CITY LIMITS AND/OR ARMSTRONG RD, SIERRA TO CITY LIMITS ROUNDABOUT STUDY AND INSTALLATION $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 TBD VALLEY WAY AND JURUPA RD. REALIGNMENT $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD 58TH ST. GAP CLOSURE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD CAMINO REAL WIDENING/INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, JURUPA RD. TO 700' SOUTH $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 TBD DALY AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 TBD PACIFIC AVE. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,228,800 $ 250,000 $ - $ 60,595,000 $ 63,198,800 TOTAL 5,659,358 $ 19,227,406 $ 16,684,600 $ 10,173,714 $ 8,413,448 $ 67,439,000 $ 127,597,526 $

UNSPECIFIED
12 Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 21, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.K

AGREEMENT BETWEEN TH E CITY OF JUR UPA VALLEY AND RHA
LANSCAPE ARCHITECTS , INC. FOR ON -CALL LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN TH E CITY OF JURUPA VAL LEY AND VAN
DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHI TECTS, INC. FOR ON -CALL LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Va lley and RHA Landscape Architects, Inc. for On-Call Landscape Architectural Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney. 2) That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. for On -Call Landscape Architectural Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
Landscape architectural services are vital to planning and land development. On March 29, 2022, S taff published a Request for Pro posals (“RFP”) for On -Call Landscape Architectural Services to select a qualified firm to provide the services. The RFP was published on the City’s PlanetBids portal, a web based procurement and bidding system.

The scope of work advertised in the RFP included landscape design services, landscape inspection services, and plan checking. The RFP closed on April 20, 2022, and the City received seven responsive proposals.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS

The City received proposals from the following firms (in alphabetical order):

o Albert A. Webb Associates, Riverside, CA
o David Volz Design Landscape Architects, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA o Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Riverside, CA
o LandArq, Inc., Ontario, CA
o Landscape Dynamics, Riverside, CA
o RHA Landscape Architects, Inc., Riverside, CA
o Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc., Solana Beach, CA

Per Section 3.15.100 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, professional services are defined as services provided by any specially trained and experienced person or firm in areas such as accounting, engineering, finance, and planning. A greements for professional services are awarded by the City Council on the basis of the demonstrated competence, qualifications, and on the fairness and reasonableness of the cost of services to the City, and shall not be awarded solely on the basis of cost.

A review committee ranked the proposals per guidelines set forth in the RFP. Staff ranked the proposals and concluded that RHA Landscape Architects, Inc. (“RHA”) and Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. (“VDLA”) were equally qualified to provide the services.

RHA is a well-established full service architectural firm with over 42 years of experience.

Their specialties include community parks, streetscapes, and downtown revitalizations.

The firm has ongoing contracts with the City of El Segundo, City of Lancaster, and City of Chino. RHA also has extensive experience with the City of Jurupa Valley working as a subconsultant with Civic Solutions, Inc. since 2018. By approving the agreement, the City will contract with RHA directly. If approved, the initial term of the agreement is three years with the option to extend the term for two, one-year extensions.

VDLA has 50 years of experience specializing in landscape architecture, urban planning and design, and irrigation design. VDLA provides architectural services to other entities in the Inland Empire such as the Riverside County Transportation & Land Managem ent Agency and the Eastern Municipal Water District. VDLA is also familiar with the City and currently performs landscape inspection services for new landscape and lighting maintenance districts and community facility districts as a subconsultant with HR Green, Inc. By approving the agreement, the City will contract with VDLA directly. If approved, the initial term of the agreement is three years with the option to extend the term for two, one-year extensions.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

Each Agreement calls for a not to exceed amount of $75,000 per fiscal year. The majority of the services provided shall be reimbursed by developm ent projects. Services that are not reimbursable through development projects are funded through department budgets.

Page | 3

ALTERNATIVES

1. Decline to approve the Agreement between the City and RHA and continue to utilize their services as a subconsultant with Civic Solutions, Inc.

2. Decline to approve the Agreement between the City and VDLA and continue to utilize their services as a subconsultant with HR Green, Inc.

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

-1-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of July 21, 2022, between the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) and RHA Landscape Architects, Inc., a California Corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term
This Agreement shall commence on August 1, 2022, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, but in no event later than July 31, 2025, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City and Consultant may extend the term of this Agreement by mutual agreement for two, one (1) year extensions. The Agreement term and all extensions thereto shall not exceed a total of five (5) years.

2. Services
Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Performance
Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. Payment
A. The City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Quotation for Service, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) each fiscal year through the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.

B. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council.
-2-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
C. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.

Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant’s fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

5. Suspension or Termination of Agreement Without Cause A. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.

B. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.

6. Default Of Consultant
A. The Consultant’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.

B. If the City Manager or his or her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. Prevailing Wages
A. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by and in accordance with the requirements of Labor Code Sections 1720 et. seq. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute by this Consultant from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies -3-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $50.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any sub-contractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement.

B. Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html.

8. Ownership and Maintenance Of Documents
A. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

B. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
-4-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A, without the written consent of the Consultant.

9. Indemnification
A. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. In connection with its design professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”), with respect to any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense (collectively “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property which to the extent arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or any of its officers, employee, sub-consultants, or agents in the performance or its professional services under this Agreement.

In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault as set forth in California Civil Code 2782.8.

B. Other Indemnities. In connection with any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively, “Damages” hereinafter) not covered by Paragraph 9.A. above, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims, including but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant’s duty to defend pursuant to this Section 9.B. shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

10. Insurance Requirements
A. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
a) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
-5-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
b) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
c) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker’s compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. d) Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant’s profession. 2) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
a) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c) Worker’s Compensation as required by the State of
California; Employer’s Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.
d) Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. 3) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000 unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

B. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (“Additional Insured”) shall be covered as insured’s as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds. -6-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.
4) The Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Consultant of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Consultant shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City’s forms, the Consultant’s insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

E. Modifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable the City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this section.

11. Independent Contractor
A. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its -7-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.

Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

B. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

12. Legal Responsibilities
The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

13. Confidentiality; Release Of Information
A. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City’s prior written authorization.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

14. Assignment
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. City consents to the use of the sub-consultants described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub-consultants shall be borne by the Consultant and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.

15. General Provisions
A. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of -8-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice.

Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant: RHA Landscape Architects, Inc.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245
Riverside, CA 92506
Attention: Doug Grove, President

B. Licenses. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

C. Governing Law; Venue
1) The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 2) Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court’s judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

D. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant’s sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant’s sub- Consultants on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. -9-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
F. Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

G. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

-10-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

Chris Barajas, Mayor

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

CONSULTANT

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

[SIGNATURES OF PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF CORPORATION OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED FOR CORPORATION; SIGNATURE OF MANAGING MEMBER REQUIRED FOR LLC OR LLP]
-11-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant will be responsible for performing landscape architectural services on an “on-call or as-needed” basis during the term of the agreement. Consultant will work with City staff to complete assignments in the most cost-effective and responsive manner. Consultant will work with City staff to complete assignments in the most cost-effective and responsive manner.

Assignments will vary in size and work tasks may consist of development plan review, capital improvement projects, Community Facilities Districts (CFD)/Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD) services, landscape design services, and inspection services.

Services may include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Assist in developing City's Urban Forest Management Program • Assist in developing City's tree removal/planting policy and schedule • Conceptual designs
• Presentations and renderings
• Provide cost estimates
• Construction support services
• Trees and other plant evaluation
• Landscape inspection services
• Plan checking
Consultant's proposal to provide the services dated April 20, 2022 attached.

Request for proposals
On-Call Landscape Architecture Services
Public Works Department
Presented to:

The City of Jurupa Valley
A
pril 20, 2022
Prepared By:

RHA Landscape Architects - Planners, Inc.
6800 Indiana Avenue
Suite 245
Riverside, CA 92506
951 - 781- 1930
www.rhala.com

P
ublic Works Department
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
RE
: On- Call Landscape Architecture Services
RHA
Landscape Architects-Planners, Inc. is very pleased to submit this proposal for the City of Jurupa Valley for On- Call Professional Landscape Architecture Services. Greg Meek, Principal, and landscape architect with RHA has been providing plan checking services for the Jurupa Valley Planning Department for the past four years and has provided plan checks for over 200 projects. Greg and the RHA staff know the City of Jurupa Valley well and have a strong understanding of all federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations and city ordinances. RHA has a well-qualified staff and we are excited for the opportunity to provide all of the professional landscape architectural services needed by the City of Jurupa Valley. President Doug Grove, RLA, LEED and Principal Greg Meek, RLA are the RHA contacts during the proposal review process.

W
e understand that the scope of work includes performing landscape architectural services on an “on -call” basis for the Public Works Department which will include various projects within the City of Jurupa Valley including landscape architectural plan checking and inspection . We have provided in the past on- call services for several cities and are currently under contract with the cities of Orange, Lancaster, Chino, and Yucca Valley. We provide personalized services and are almost always available and very prompt with our responses when contacted. Located 5 miles from the Jurupa City Hall, we will feel like we are an extension of their staff! We make ourselves available by phone, cell phone, email, text, facetime , and zoom, when you have questions or need information.

O
ur specific scope of work will depend upon the nature of each project and may consist of any or all of the following:
• Working Knowledge of City codes, regulations, and permit requirements • Assist in developing City’s Urban Forest Management Program • Assist in developing City’s tree removal/planting policy and schedule • Conceptual designs
• Presentations and renderings
• PS&E Development
• CFD/LLMD Formation and Assessments
• Project drafting, including Computer Aiding Design
April 20, 2022
• Provide cost estimates
• Construction support services
• Trees and other plant evaluation
• Inspection Services
• Plan Checking
The RHA team offers a wide range of landscape architectural experiences and expertise to assist you in the development and rehabilitation of a wide variety of public spaces . Experience specialties include:

C
ommunity Parks Neighborhood parks
Sports Complexes Play Area Design and Renovations
Slash Pads Dog parks
Skate Parks Nature Parks
Water Reservoirs Recreation Areas
Preservation of Natural and Historic Sites Government Centers Public Office and Administration Facilities Pump and Lift Stations Streetscapes Downtown Revitalizations
W
ITH THE RHA TEAM YOU GET...
• One of California's leading landscape architecture, planning and design firms • LEED certified design firm focused on sustainable “green” design • Experienced Park design and urban renewal firm
• Experienced working relationship with public agencies • A solid reputation for the production of technically outstanding documents • A strong Quality Control program
T
hank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We enthusiastically look forward to an opportunity to present our team members and qualifications in person and to respond to any questions you may have. This proposal shall remain Valid for a period of no less than 120 Days from the date of the submittal.

Sin
cerely,
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

D
oug Grove, RLA, LEED® AP
President
951-781-1930 ext 121
951-686-8091 FAX [email protected]
On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter
Table of Contents
O rganization/Company Profile 1
Description of services 10
Hourly Rate Sheets 17
Exhibit A. Proposers Signature Page 19
Exhibit B Non-Collusion Declaration 22
Exhibit C. References 23
Exhibit D. Required Subconsultant Form 24
Copies of Landscape Architecture Licenses 25
Evidence of Insurability (Insurance Certificate) 26
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951) 781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com

RHA ORGANIZATION/COMPANY PROFILE
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

E
stablished in 1979, RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. offers a wide range of landscape architectural and planning services to assist public agencies and private developers in the design of variety of public spaces and facilities. RHA has been providing Landscape Architectural Services for over 42 years.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIRM
RHA Landscape Architects-Planners, Inc. (RHA) is a multi-disciplinary landscape architecture and planning firm with a history of producing exemplary products for public and private clients throughout Southern California. RHA is a State of California C Corporation.

R
HA is headed by two principals: Doug Grove, RLA, LEED AP the firm's president and Greg Meek, RLA.

We use a "team" approach under the direction of the firm's principals and its associates.

R
HA is located in the City of Riverside, at 6800 Indiana Ave. suite 245 only about 5 miles from the City of Jurupa Valley. The staff of seven (7) persons includes four (4) licensed landscape architects as well as support designers.

PER
SONNEL
The RHA organizational system utilizes a team approach. Under principal management, our project assignments are organized into teams of professionals, with each team led by a principal. RHA maintains a high ratio of one licensed landscape architect to designers.

RHA STAFF
Doug Grove, RLA - President/Landscape Architect/LEED AP Greg Meek, RLA - Principal/Landscape Architect
David Black, RLA - Project Manager/Landscape Architect Lauren McCullough, RLA - Project Manager/Landscape Architect Jennifer Iklady - Project Manager/Landscape Designer
Andrew Lytle - Landscape Designer
Kathi Beatty - Accounting
O
ver the course of the firm's 42 years of work in Southern California, RHA has garnered a number of prestigious awards from a variety of organizations, including the American Society of L andscape Architects, the American Planning Association, and the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS). One of the firm's projects, the General Plan for the California Citrus State Historic Park, was named the Outstanding Planning Project by the In land Empire Section of the American Planning Association, and 1 RHA ORGANIZATION/COMPANY PROFILE
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951) 781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com received a prestigious Honor Award from the Southern California Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects.

T
he firm also garnered CPRS awards for Excellence in Park & Facility Planning for the Cities of Upland (McCarthy Park), Riverside (White Park), Norco (Pikes Peak Park) and Riverside County (Ranch Jurupa Park). Pikes Peak Park was also given an APWA (American Public Works Association) award of excellence.

P
art of the success of our work stems from our ability to balance the needs and desires of a project's designer and builder, and of the public agency which is being asked for approval. We recognize that there are always a number of real world considerations --over and above "good design" --which must be accommodated in a project's design and implementation, and we seek to balance all these factors.

Kno
wledge of Applicable Codes
RHA's successful background in similar projects reflects our incisive working knowledge of all applicable local, State, and national building codes, standards and regulations. This includes Uniform Building Codes, State Administrative Codes, etc. We have worked closely with numerous review agencies for many years, and are thoroughly knowledgeable with review, approval, and variance procedures. We know how to work successfully with agency officials to achieve problem resolution and are also experienced and adept at interfacing with local agencies and officials.

P

HILOSOPHY
Design - Management – Service, RHA was founded on these principles … principles which allow us to approach each project with fresh ideas, and a special awareness of each client's specific needs. We offer a wide range of landscape architectural, planning, and urban design services, with the unique ability to guide interdisciplinary teams from site selection, analysis, through design, into construction, and evaluate landscape maintenance.

W
e are dedicated to providing each client with innovative design solutions, based on our understanding of the intricate relationship between people and the environmental factors, which through effective design, and are balanced by the economic and functional needs of our clients. Our staff combines training in the physical and life sciences with a thorough understanding of environmental design, construction technology, and project management to provide the serv ice demanded by today's market on schedule and within budget.

L

ANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Design of the land, the b asis of landscape architecture, any project involving manipulation of the environment for human use should include the services of a landscape architect. RHA is a full service landscape architectural firm with the capability to guide your project from conception through construction and beyond.

R
HA is unequivocally committed to deliver a high- quality project on time, within budget, and in a professional and competent manner.
2 RHA ORGANIZATION/COMPANY PROFILE
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951) 781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com Project Team Organizational Chart
Doug Grove Greg Meek
President Principal
Landscape Architect Landscape Architect

LEED AP
Jennifer Salazar Lauren McHugh David Black
Project Manager Project Manager Project Manager
Landscape Designer Landscape Architect Landscape Architect Kathy Beatty Andrew Lytle
Office Manager Project Captain
Accounting Landscape Designer
3 KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES – Doug Grove
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951)781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com Doug Grove, RLA, ASLA, LEED® AP
President
E
ducation:

BS/1985/Landscape Architecture/
Cal State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Ac
tive Registration:
1987/Landscape Architect/2799/State of California
LEED Accredited Professional – United States Green Building Council (USGBC) Mr. Grove is President, Principal Landscape Architect, and LEED Accredited Professional with RHA Landscape Architects - Planners, Inc. He graduated from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona in 1985 and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Landscape Architecture. A professional Landscape Architect for over 35 years, his wide range of experience in the public works sector includes in the design and project management of hundreds of park projects as well as housing development, streetscape, institutional and commercial projects.

M
r. Grove has established his ability to work efficiently and professionally throughout all aspects of project development.

His extensive experience has included management and design of projects from preliminary phases to construction documents, and coordination and observation of proj ect installation. He has been responsible for coordinating public meetings, design development, and approval on numerous public works and parks projects as well as following through with obtaining all other necessary approvals needed for final drawing and project completion.

M
r. Grove serves on the California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS) State Board of Directors as the Sections Representative and the CPRS District 11 Board of Directors as the Administrators Section Representative. He also serves on the Board of Directors for the California Turf and Landscape Foundation at the University of California, Riverside and the Building Industry Association (BIA) Riverside County Board of Directors. He is a past President of the CPRS State Development and O perations Section and a past Board Member for the United States Green Building Council – Inland Empire (USGBC-IE).

R
epresentative projects include (partial list):

T
rails
• San Marcos Trails Master Plan, San Marcos
• Orange Blossom Trail – Phase 2, Redlands
• Orange Blossom Trail – Phase 1, Redlands
• Arroyo Seco Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail, South Pasadena • Yucca Valley Trails Master Plan, Yucca Valley
• Barton Vineyard Apartments / Zanja Trail, Redlands
• Victoria Avenue Beautification and D.G. Walking Trail, Riverside • Presidio Hills Multi-Use Trail, Moreno Valley
P
ark and Recreation Needs Assessments
• Chino Parks and Facilities Master Plan
• Carlsbad Parks and Recreation Master Plan
• Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District Parks and Recreation Master Plan • San Clemente Parks and Recreation Master Plan
• Temple City Parks and Open Space Master Plan
4 KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES – Doug Grove
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951)781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com • Carlsbad Needs Assessment and Comprehensive Action Plan • Ladera Ranch Needs Assessment/Park and Recreation Master Plan, Ladera Ranch • San Jacinto Park and Recreation Master Plan, San Jacinto N
eighborhood Parks
• Dolphin Park Inclusive Playground, City of Carson
• Shadow Mountain Park Inclusive Playground, City of Moreno Valley • Moreno Valley Community Park Skatepark, City of Moreno Valley • Lancaster Skatepark, City of Lancaster
• Lee Owens Park, City of Whittier
• Acacia and Washington Parks , City of El Segundo
• Monte Vista Park, City of Chino
• Celebration Park, City of Ontario
• Rimgate and Tamarisk Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • Concourse and Mountain View Park Renovations, City of Lake Forest • Norco Ridge Ranch Park, City of Norco
• Stagecoach Park, City of Corona
• Machris Park, Town of Yucca Valley
• Hi-Desert Park, Town of Yucca Valley
• San Antonio Park, City of Upland
• Jameson Park, City of Corona
• Hull Park, City of Lancaster
• Pikes Peak Park, City of Norco
• McCarthy Park, City of Upland
• Upland Parks Renovation, City of Upland
• Cresta Verde Park Renovation, City of Corona
• City Park Renovation, City of Corona
• Twila Reid & John Marshall Parks Renovation, City of Anaheim • Judson Street Park, City of Redlands
• Montecito Ranch Park, County of Riverside
• Taft Park, City of Riverside
H
istorical Parks
• Aliso Viejo Ranch, City of Aliso Viejo
• Founders Park, City of Anaheim
• San Antonio Park, City of Upland
• White Park, City of Riverside
• Reyes-Adobe, City of Agoura Hills
• Hillcrest Park Renovation, City of Fullerton
• Jensen Alvarado Ranch, County of Riverside
• California Citrus State Historic Park, State of California and City of Riverside C
ommunity and Sports Parks
• La Palma Park, City of Anaheim
• Torrance Park, City of Torrance
• Yorba Park, City of Orange
• Oak Park Sports Fields, Pleasant Hill Recreation & Parks District 5 KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES – Greg Meek
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951)781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com

GREG MEEK, RLA

PRINCIPAL
EDUCATION:

BA/1979/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE/

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Performance Leadership – D unkinWorks 2016
Resolve - Negotiations training – Agreement Dynamics Inc. 2017 ACTIVE REGISTRATION:

Landscape Architect/2484/State of California
Certified Playground Safety Inspector (CPSI)
Mr. Meek is a Principal Landscape Architect with RHA Landscape Architects-Planners, Inc. He graduated from Texas A&M and holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Landscape Architecture. A professional Landscape Architect for over 36 years, his wide range of experience in the public works sector includes 3 years as the Senior Landscape Architect for the City of San Jose, the tenth largest city in the United States and 10 years of experience as a park development coordinator for various cities in California. He has been responsible for managing Park Dwelling and Park Impact fees, preparing and monitoring agency capital budgets, planning and managing agency capital improvement program, developing requests for services, agreements, and contracts, negotiating fees for services, preparing contracts, and managing staff and contractors.

M
r. Meek’s experience in the private sector has included business development, client and pr oject management, preparing budgets and cost estimates as well as the design of sports parks, neighborhood parks, schools, and streetscape projects. He has also provided consultant plan checking services for the cities of Diamond Bar and Palm Desert as well as in his capacity as landscape architect at the cities of Fullerton, San Jose, and San Mateo.

Representative projects include (partial list):
• E
lysian Park, Los Angeles,Californaia
• Marine Park, City of Santa Monica, California
• Lucinda Garcia Park, City of Monrovia, California
• Jurupa Valley Planning Department Plan Checking, City of Jurupa Valley, California • Lee Owens Park, City of Whittier, California
• Dolphin Park Inclusive Playground, City of Carson, California • Acacia and Washington Park, City of El Segundo, California • Hayward Square Park, City of San Mateo, California
• Beresford Park, City of San Mateo, California
• Martin Luther King Park, City of San Mateo, California • Poplar Creek Golf Course club House Landscape Renovation, City of San Mateo, California • Lake Cunningham Bike Park/ Extreme Sports Park, San Jose, California • Grand Terrace Fitness Park, Grand Terrace, California • Bagdouma Park Renovation Project, City of Coachella, California • Dateland Park Renovation Project, City of Coachella, California • Casmalia and Alder Street Beautification Project, Rialto, California • Terra Bella Specific Plan Landscape Design Guidelines, French Valley California • Stratham Homes Neighborhood Park – Jurupa, California • Menifee Town Center, Menifee California
• Rancon Medical Office Center Wildomar, California
• Mission Plaza, Riverside, California
6 KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES – Greg Meek
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951)781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com • Sycamore Creek Housing Development Temescal Valley, California • Rancon Medical Office Center Wildomar, California
• Eastside Park Phase II Improvements, City of Yorba Linda, California • Community Park Improvement Project, Poway, California • Comprehensive Park and Facilities Master Plan, Colton, California • C
amp Little Bear, Themed Park Development, Bell, California • Clarington and Mandeville Parks and Play Area Renovation Projects, Laguna Hills, California • Fo
ur Park Play Area Renovation Projects, Gardena, California • Eight Park Evaluation and Improvement Project, City of Indio • Downtown Fullerton Street Tree Improvement Project, City of Fullerton • Vista Community Sports Complex, City of Vista, California • South Gate Park Renovation and Beautification, South Gate, California • Washington Street Park Development, Diamond Bar, California • Yorba Linda Water District, Elk Mountain Park Feasibility Study, Yorba Linda, California • San Dimas Avenue Streetscape Improvements, San Dimas, California • Casmalia and Alder Street Beautification Project, Rialto, California • Terra Bella Specific Plan Landscape Design Guidelines, French Valley California • Stratham Homes Neighborhood Park – Jurupa, California • Menifee Town Center, Menifee California
• Rancon Medical Office Center Wildomar, California
• Mission Plaza, Riverside, California
• Sycamore Creek Housing Development Temescal Valley, California 7 KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES – David Black
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951)781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com

DAVID BLACK, RLA

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
EDUCATION:

BS/1999/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE/

CAL STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA
ACTIVE REGISTRATION:
2009/Landscape Architect/5509/State of California
Contractor License CA #789824(C27)
Mr
. Black has been a project manager at RHA Landscape Archi tects-Planners, Inc. for over 12 years. His varied experience includes consulting and plan check services for public agencies, construction observation services and the design of streetscapes/roadway improvement projects, grade separations, pedestrian and bike trail projects, neighborhood park projects, large scale regional park projects, hospitals, and community landscape planning assignments.

As a
professional landscape architect , Mr. Black has established his ability to work efficiently and professionally throughout all aspects of project development. His experience has included management and design of projects from preliminary phases to construction documents, and coordination and observation of project installation. He has been responsible for coordinating meetings with clients and governing agencies, overseeing project budget preparation, design development and construction administration on numerous projects.

Rep
resentative projects include (partial list):

Ho
me Development Agency Consulting Plan Review / Plan Check Services Logan Homes, City of Corona City of Jurupa Valley [6-years] Ryland Homes, City of Corona City of Banning
Highpointe Communities City of Lake Elsinore
Redhawk, County of Riverside
St
reetscape Projects School Projects
Mission Blvd Revitalization, RivCo EDA Emerald Meadows, Jurupa Unified School District Ramsey Street, City of Banning Eleanor Roosevelt High School, Corona-Norco USD Main Street, City of Corona
Co
mmunity Parks Utility Agency Projects
Lancaster Youth Baseball/Softball Center, Lancaster Letterman Booster Station, Eastern MWD Jameson Park, City of Corona Diaz Road Lift Station, Eastern MWD Rancho Jurupa Regional Park, County of Riverside Western Way Pump Station, Eastern MWD Orange Terrace Community Park, City of Riverside March Wastewater Reclamation Facility, Western MWD Corona Zone 6 Reservoir – Landscape Improvement Plans
Commercial Projects Landscape Analysis and Report, Upper San Gabriel MWD Gail Materials, County of Riverside Landscape Improvement Plans, Upper San Gabriel MWD Southern California Edison, San Jacinto Landscape Improvement Plans, Inland Empire Utilities Agency Riverside Medical Clinic, City of Riverside Shelter Belt, Eastvale Plant #1, Western Riverside County Shelly BMW, City of Buena Park Regional Waste Water Authority 8 KE
Y PERSONNEL RESUMES – Lauren McHugh
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC.
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 245, Riverside, California 92506 – (951)781-1930 – (951) 686-8091 – www.rhala.com Lauren McHugh, RLA
Landscape Architect
E
ducation:

BS/2006/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE/

CAL STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA
A
ctive Registration:
2009/Landscape Architect/5578/State of California
Ms
. McHugh is a Project Manager with RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. She graduated from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Landscape Architecture. She has more than 11 years of landscape design and computer aided graphic design experience with RHA. Her experience has included design of projects from preliminary phases to construction documents that include streetscapes/roadway improvement projects, pedestrian and bike trail projects, neighborhood park projects, large scale regional park projects, hospitals, and community landscape planning assignments.

Representative projects include:

Ne
eds Assessments and Master Plans
• Temple City Parks and Open Space Master Plan, City of Temple City • Carlsbad Needs Assessment and Comprehensive Action Plan, City of Carlsbad • Ladera Ranch Needs Assessment/Park and Recreation Master Plan, Ladera Ranch • San Jacinto Park and Recreation Master Plan, City of San Jacinto T
rails Planning
• Orange Blossom Trail – Phase 1, City of Redlands
• Orange Blossom Trail – Phase 2, City of Redlands
• Arroyo Seco Pedestrian and Bicycle Trail, City of South Pasadena Park Planning
• Celebration Park, City of Ontario
• Fergusson Park, City of Rialto
• Rancho Jurupa Regional Sports Complex, Riverside County EDA • Rancho Jurupa Park – RV Park, Water Play & Miniature Golf, County of Riverside • American Heroes Park, City of Lancaster
• Stagecoach Park, City of Corona
• Founder’s Park, City of Anaheim
• Tamarisk and Rimgate Parks, City of Lake Forest
• Concourse and Mountain View Parks, City of Lake Forest • Norco Ridge Ranch Park, City of Norco
• Whit Carter Park, City of Lancaster
• Eller Park, Town of Romoland
9 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description of Services - Projects

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES - PROJECTS
I. PROJECT APPROACH
Our specific scope of work will depend upon the nature of each project and may consist of any or all of the following: Conceptual/Preliminary Design Development, Site Evaluation and Selection, Program Development , Working Drawings/Specifications, Assistance during Bidding, Construction Observation, Inspection Services , Preparation of Maintenance Guidelines and General Consulting
T
he following design process is generally how we approach a typical project. This process will be customized for each individual project and may include any or all of the following services:

A. CO

NCEPTUAL PLANNING
Project Base Sheet – We will work from AutoCAD generated base data provided by Project Engineer.

P
roject Site Review – We will visit/review the site and verify existing site conditions and adjacent development.

Sc
hematic Design – We will prepare a rough Schematic Plan for Agency review/input. The products of the schematic planning phase initially will be rough sketche s, plan view studies/overlays and discussion, finishing with a loose, yet slightly more refined CAD drawing.

C
onceptual Plan – We will prepare a finished Conceptual Plan delineating the landscape development. This plan will be based upon design team and Agency input from the preceding Schematic Plan. The plans will illustrate the scale and relationship of the project components and will depict all landscape elements of the project, their approximate location, use, and general description. We will color render the completed plans.

B
. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Project Base Sheet – We will work from AutoCAD generated base data provided by the Engineer.

P
roject Site Review – We will visit/review the site and verify existing site conditions and adjacent development.

P
reliminary Design – We will prepare a Preliminary Plan delineating the landscape development. This plan will be based upon design team and Agency input. The plans will illustrate the scale and relationship of the project components and will depict all landscape elements o f the project , their approximate location, use, and general description. We will color render the completed plan.
10 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description of Services - Projects
O
pinion of Probable Construction Cost – We will prepare a preliminary opinion of probable construction cost.

C. CO
NSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS – We will prepare the following construction documents in sufficient detail for competitive bidding and construction:

P
lanting Plan and Details – Planting plants will specify all proposed plant material to be installed in the improvement areas. We will prov ide photos and descriptions of all plant material for review by the Agency. Details in concurrence with the Agency standards will be provided.

I
rrigation Plan and Details – This plan will layout all piping, valve, control equipment, and sprinkler heads for irrigation of the planted areas. The Irrigation Plan will define water wise irrigation design and equipment including water distribution devices, valves, lines, controllers and all components necessary to operate the irrigation systems. Details in concurrence with the Agency standards will be provided. We will prepare the various required water use estimate calculations, peak demand calculations, watering window calculations and pressure loss calculations.

S
oil Management Plan - In accordance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and any Agency /County specific ordinance we will prepare a Soil Management Plan that will include soil testing after mass grading to identify soil type, texture, infiltration rates and recommendations for soil amendments.

L
andscape Maintenance Plan - In accordance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and any Agency/County specific ordinance we will prepare a Landscape Maintenance plan that will include irrigation schedules, and a regular maintenance schedule.

S
pecifications – We will prepare notes/specifications identifying types and qualities of materials and methods to be used in construction.

O
pinion of Probable Construction Cost – We will prepare an opinion of probable construction cost based upon the construction documents.

D. B

IDDING PROCESS
We understand that Agency , RHA or the architect/engineer will disperse the plans and request bids from the appropriate contractors and will receive bids. We will answer questions and provide clarification as necessary and will assist in the evaluation of the bids received as required.
11 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description of Services - Projects
E. CO

NSTRUCTION OBSERVATION
RHA will make weekly field observation visits of the project during construction to review construction progress as requested by the Agency. The Agency inspector will provide the day-to-day inspection, organize the meetings and provide construction administration.

We will support the Agency, advising and making recommendations.

1. A p
re-construction conference will be conducted to be attended by the Agency, Design Team, and the contractor along with major subcontractors for the project. All of the requirements regarding the hours of operation during the length of the construction process will be carefully outlined. All of the required contracts, bonds, and insurance will be reviewed with the contractor. Construction schedules as provided by the contractor along with the schedule of values will be reviewed and approved.

2. W
eekly to the job sites will be conducted including meetings with the general contractor and the Agency to ascertain the progress of the project and its compliance with the contract documents. Meeting minutes will be prepared for distribution.

3. All necessary drawings/specification clarifications will be prepared to further indicate project requirements.

4. A
ssistance will be provided for the development of change orders as related to the original scope of work along with the review of contractor submittals including reviewing and approving all cost breakdowns.

5. All s
ubmittals provided by the contractor as required in the contract documents will be reviewed and approved including shop drawings, samples, and product data.

Turnaround ti me for review of submittals will be one (1) week from receipt of submittals in RHA’s office.

6. A
ssistance will be provided as to the appropriateness of all testing and inspection related to the project.

7. U
pon completion of the project, a final punch list will be prepared for items to be corrected on the project by the contractor. Assistance will be provided in coordinating all of the required guarantees and operating manuals for all of the components of the irrigation systems.

8. A f
inal inspe ction of the project at the conclusion of the landscape maintenance period. We will make recommendations for acceptance by the Agency as appropriate.

9. W
e will periodically review the as-built drawings in the field and at project completion for accuracy.
12 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description of Services – Plan Checking and Inspections

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES - PLAN CHECKING & INSPECTIONS
RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

RHA is currently performing landscape plan check and inspection services for the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department. In the past RHA has provided plan checking services for the City of Lake Elsinore, City of Highland and the City of Corona. We know the City of Jurupa Valley’s ordinances, City Wide Design Standards and goals as well as the City’s Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance requirements.

Plan Check and inspection Process
T
he following is the approach we are proposing to use to provide plan checking services to the City of Jurupa Valley;
K
ickoff Meeting - Before the start of any plan checking for the City of Jurupa Valley, RHA would complete another review of the development requirements, ordinances, guidelines, and standards as they pertain to architecture and landscape development. We would the n prepare an architecture and landscape plan review check list and review it with the planning department. This review will insure we have covered everything needed for plan review as well as set up priorities for the items which have been issues in the past and are the most important to the city.

We have found with other cities , that to accomplish planning goals such as the removal of blight, beautification through color, increased visibility for safety, maximizing tree shade, or elimination of turf for water use reduction, focus priorities are identified. We want to understand the long- term goals of the City of Jurupa Valle y and help the city achieve these goals.

Sample Page of Plan Check List
13 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description of Services – Plan Checking and Inspections Transfer of Plans and Information – We have found the most efficient way to accomplish plan checking is by the electronic transfer of plans forms and information. By using Drop Box or other file transferring systems, large documents can be transferred and reviewed quickly and efficiently . Depending on the project , we are often returning review comments the same day. If plans cannot be transferred electronically, Greg Meek from our office passes by City of Jurupa Valley twice a day on his way to and from work and can easily pick up or drop off plans and documents.

P
roject Tracking – An electronic file and a hard file is kept of all plan checking document s. We use the p lanning departments numbers assigned to a project but we also give it a second RHA number by the year the project is received. We keep an additional ongoing project status log of all projects so that we know where the project is in the approval process at all times. Many development projects are in review for several years and often change owners, that’s why our project tracking process has to be accurate & detailed.

P
lan Review Log In - We will prepare a plan review log in spreadsheet that will assist in tracking the status of the projects and ensure that services are completed in a timely manner.

P
lan Review Experience and Philosophy – RHA Landscape Architects, Planners is made up of highly experienced landscape architects and designers which understand the importance of an accurate and efficient plan review process. Greg Meek will be doing most of the plan checking for the City of Jurupa Valley and he has provided plan checking services for over 15 year s for several cities. Greg worked for the cities of Fullerton, San Jose, and San Mateo, so he has a unique understanding of city processes. Our staff also provides landscape architectural design services for housing projects in several cities by a couple of different development companies. Because we have been on both sides of the counter, we are very knowledgeable as to the elements and information that are expected. We provide plan checking that protects the city’s best interest first, but will be efficient and consistent.

We will always be available to communicate with your staff on all projects that have special considerations or are politically sensitive.

1. Fi
rst Plan Review
a) Review the project site on Google Earth or visit the site to become familiar with the project area and what is around the project site.
b
) We will review the plans and submitted documents. Often the first review will be a conceptual landscape plan. After reviewing the site and submitted documents, comments will be prepared and developed into a review comment letter. Plans may also be redlined if it will assist the applicant with understanding the comments. The comment letter and redli ned plans will be returned to the planning department for distribution to the project owner or developer. A written response to each comment will be requested Riverside County Community and Cultural Services Division RHA Plan Review Log Landscape Plan Review and Landscape Maintenance Cost Analysis Received Reviewed
by
Returned
to County Comments Received Reviewed
by
Returned
to County Comments Received Reviewed
by
Returned
to County Comments
First Plan Review
No. Project Description
Second Plan Review Third Plan Review
14 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description of Services – Plan Checking and Inspections from the landscape architect preparing the plans or the project owner . This response to comments is to be returned to the planning department with the next submittal. c) W
e will confirm quantities and area measurements by inserting an electronic copy (PDF, JPEG, etc.) of the plan into AutoCAD and creating a digital measurement field for all landscape areas.

2. S
ubsequent Plan Reviews
Often landscape plans will need to be modified and submitted several times to become approved. The most common reason for multiple plan check reviews is the information is missing or the comments were not addressed. Additional plan check reviews generally do not take as long to complete because we are already familiar with the projects. The following tasks are performed during plan checks that occur after the first plan check.
a) W
e will review the revised plans for conformance with the previous plan check comments. We also look for unrequested changes to the plans that might conflict with the plan requirements. b) We will update quantities and measurements as needed.

3. Compliance Inspection Services
After the Landscape Architect of record provides a letter stating that the project was installed per the plans and specifications, RHA will provide site inspection s to confirm the landscape is substantially complete.

Additional inspections will be provided at the request of the City Planning Department.

4. Direct Contact with the Applicant
At the request of the ci ty planning department, RHA will receive calls and discuss plan review comments with the applicant. RHA will only explain, provide clarifications, and reinforce landscape requirements with the applicant. Decisions as to deviations, modifications or exemptions will have to come directly from the c ity planners.

Plan Check and Inspection Billing
Plan Checking and Inspection Fees
Plan checking and inspection will be provided at the agreed upon hourly rates. Portions of the hour are rounded up to 15- minute increments. The number of hours required per project depends on the size of the project and the response of the applicant to the review comments. We have had some clients that resubmit plans without responding to comments which triggers another review cycle. We have found that in the City of Jurupa Valley it is not uncommon for us to have to review a project three times until they respond to all the comments.

L
arge housing development projects often take as much as 4 hour s to provide the first review. Each review after becomes shorter but usually not less than 1 hour. Small projects rarely take more than two hours to review the plans and write the review comment letters.

M
onthly Billing
An Excel spread sheet is often used to provide a summary of hours spent on each project plan check. 15 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description of Services – Plan Checking and Inspections The projects on the tracking and billing sheets are listed by city assigned numbers, project name, project address, hours billed, date plan check was completed and a project number assigned by RHA.

Hours are totaled weekly as this information can be provided to the c ity for tracking purposes , upon request. RHA will use any format the city requests for billing and tracking purposes.

The following is a sample of the billing sheet used by the City of Jurupa Valley; Av
ailability of Staff
RHA is currently completing plan checking services and inspection requests within a couple of days of receiving them (two weeks is requested by the cities). Greg Meek and David Black are currently providing the plan checking services which are accurate and ef ficient. We could easily handle additional phone calls and very high workloads. Due to our proven plan checking system s, it would be very easy to have additional staff assist with plan checking if needed.

U
se of Technology for Conducting Plan Reviews
Over the past six years providing plan checking services for the City of Jurupa Valley we have gotten away from hard copy or paper plan submittals during our plan checking process. We have found that it has made plan checking faster and less costly for the applicants. We receive, distribute, track and store all of the plans and documents electronically. Our turn around time has been as fast as a couple of hours but our average is about three days verses two weeks that it used to take sending hard copies back and forth.

Everything goes through the planning department. With the Covid-19 virus, some cities may never take hard copies again because it has forced us to use technology to stay safe . With some agencies we have been using Bluebeam to provide comments and as a method of transferring documents. RHA has all of the software needed to use a ny of these processes. We even have a d rone to do flyovers and aerial photography of our projects, before and after. It has been great for looking at areas that may not be accessible on foot.

RHA Landscape Architects-
Planners, Inc.

Project Name Case # Hours
Deposit
Fees @$/hr Date
RHA
Phase
Barrington Place -Frontier [DB]
landscape inspection
2018-
16406 0.50
$

87.50 04.05.19 8.20
Barrington Place -Frontier [DB]
landscape inspection
2018-
16407 0.50
$

87.50 04.05.19 8.20
Barrington Place -Frontier [DB]
landscape inspection
2018-
16408 0.25
$

43.75 04.05.19 8.20
Barrington Place -Frontier [DB]
landscape inspection
2018-
16409 0.25
$

43.75 04.05.19 8.20

16 On-Call Landscape Architect Services April 20, 2022 City of Jurupa Valley
RH
A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Fee Proposal
Typical Hourly Rate Fees
R
HA’s Fees for plan checking services will be charged at the Hourly rate of $175.00 per hour and will be performed by the Principal Landscape Architect.

T
he following are estimates of the costs for different plan check tasks:

I
nitial Plan Check includes obtaining landscape plans & documents from the planner, checking plans and documents for compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Ordinance and Design Guidelines, and providing a comment letter with recommendations for compliance from the plan check. 2 hours @ $175.00/Hour = $350
1st Recheck include obtaining recheck landscape plans & documents from the planner, rechecking plans and documents for compliance and response to previous comments, and providing a recheck comment letter.

1.5 hours @ $175.00/Hour = $262.50
2nd Recheck include obtaining recheck landscape plans & documents from the planner, rechecking plans and documents for compliance and response to previous comments, and providing a recheck comment letter.

1.5 hours @ $175.00/Hour = $262.50
3rd Recheck (if needed) include obtaining recheck landscape plans & documents from the planner, rechecking plans and documents for compliance and response to previous comments, and providing a recheck comment letter.
1 hour @ $175.00/Hour = $175
A
dditional rechecks include obtaining recheck landscape plans & documents from the planner, rechecking plans and documents for compliance and response to previous comments, and providing a recheck comment letter.
1 hour @ $175.00/Hour = $175
P
lan Check Inspections include visiting the site, documenting conditions out of compliance with pictures & notes if they exist and providing an inspection comment letter. Multiple lots in housing done at the same time take about .25 hours ea.
2 hours @ $175.00/Hour = $350
P
lan Check Re-Inspections include a second visit to the site, documenting conditions out of compliance with pictures & notes if they exist and providing an inspection comment letter. 2 hours @ $145.00/Hour = $290
A
dditional landscape architectural services that are plan check related such as meetings, consultations, evaluations, etc. will be billed at the hourly rate of $175.00 per hour.

R
eimbursables for inspections, pick-up, and delivery of plans are included in the above hourly rates. 17 6800 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 245, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 (951) 781- 1930 LICENSE #1512 FAX (951) 686 - 8091 E - MAIL: [email protected] NO
RMAL HOURLY RATES 2022
Senior Principal
Principal Landscape Architect
Project Manager
Landscape Designer
Administrative Personnel
$210.00 per hour
180.00 per hour
130.00 per hour
110.00 per hour

80.00 per hour
REI

MBURSABLE ITEMS
Reimbursable items such as the cost of blueprinting, graphic reproduction and plotting will be billed at our direct cost plus 15%. Auto travel will be charged at $0.585 per mile. Where we are able to utilize direct billing to Owner established accounts the "plus 15%" is not applicable.

OV

ERTIME REQUESTS
It is RHA's responsibility to schedule the project's completion under normal conditions without the use of the staff on an overtime basis. If the owner adjusts the deadline or requests that work be completed earlier than originally scheduled and thus requires overtime, the fees shall be adjusted to cover the increased costs incurred by RHA. The hourly rates for overtime will be one and one-half (1½) times the hourly rates above.

TE

RMS AND CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT
We will bill on a monthly basis in proportion to the time spent on the project to date. All billing statements are due within 15 days of Engineers receipt of payment from client. Interest will be charged at the rate of 1½% per month on the past due balance thirty days and over. RHA shall have the right to stop work should accounts become past due. 18 19
20 21
22 Request for Proposals for On-call Landscape Architectural Services 15 RFP for Landscape Architect Services

EXHIBIT C

LIST OF REFERENCES

ON-CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
PROPOSER: ________________________________________________ Following are the names, addresses and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which PROPOSER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years:

1. Name and Address of Agency
Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Date Completed
Type of Work

2. Name and Address of Agency
Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Date Completed
Type of Work

3. Name and Address of Agency
Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project Contract Amount Date Completed
Type of Work
$250,000
$50,000
RHA Landscape Architects, Planners
City of Chino - 13220 Central Avenue, Chino, CA 91710
Carolyn Baltzer, Projects Manger (909) 334-3401
Current Contract
On-Call landscpe Architecture Services & Park Improvement Projects Nichole Jones, Project Manager, (661) 723-6173
City of Lancaster - 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93534 Current Contract
On-Call Landscape Architecture and Park Improvement Projects Cheryl Ebert, PE. (310) 524-2321
City of El Segundo - 401 Sheldon Street, El Segundo CA 90245 Current Contract
On-Call Landscape Architecture and Park Improvement Projects $140,000
23 Request for Proposals for On-call Landscape Architectural Services 16 RFP for Landscape Architect Services

EXHIBIT D

REQUIRED SUBCONSULTANT INFORMATION
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
West Coast Arborist
(909)783-6544
21718 Walnut Avenue
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
Certified Arborist WE-7655 BUM
Arborist Services - Tree Evaluations
24 25
26 -12-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
Regular 2022 hourly rates attached.
6800 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 245, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 (951) 781- 1930 LICENSE #1512 FAX (951) 686 - 8091 E - MAIL: [email protected] NO
RMAL HOURLY RATES 2022
Senior Principal
Principal Landscape Architect
Project Manager
Landscape Designer
Administrative Personnel
$210.00 per hour
180.00 per hour
130.00 per hour
110.00 per hour

80.00 per hour
REI

MBURSABLE ITEMS
Reimbursable items such as the cost of blueprinting, graphic reproduction and plotting will be billed at our direct cost plus 15%. Auto travel will be charged at $0.585 per mile. Where we are able to utilize direct billing to Owner established accounts the "plus 15%" is not applicable.

OV

ERTIME REQUESTS
It is RHA's responsibility to schedule the project's completion under normal conditions without the use of the staff on an overtime basis. If the owner adjusts the deadline or requests that work be completed earlier than originally scheduled and thus requires overtime, the fees shall be adjusted to cover the increased costs incurred by RHA. The hourly rates for overtime will be one and one-half (1½) times the hourly rates above.

TE

RMS AND CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT
We will bill on a monthly basis in proportion to the time spent on the project to date. All billing statements are due within 15 days of Engineers receipt of payment from client. Interest will be charged at the rate of 1½% per month on the past due balance thirty days and over. RHA shall have the right to stop work should accounts become past due. 18 -1-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ON-CALL

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of July 21, 2022, between the City of Jurupa Valley (“City”) and Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc., a California Corporation (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. Term
This Agreement shall commence on August 1, 2022, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed in accordance with the Scope of Services, but in no event later than July 31, 2025, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City and Consultant may extend the term of this Agreement by mutual agreement for two, one (1) year extensions. The Agreement term and all extensions thereto shall not exceed a total of five (5) years.

2. Services
Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. Performance
Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. Payment
A. The City agrees to cause Consultant to be paid monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Quotation for Service, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) each fiscal year through the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.

B. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council.
-2-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
C. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.

Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant’s fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

5. Suspension or Termination of Agreement Without Cause A. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.

B. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.

6. Default Of Consultant
A. The Consultant’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant’s control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.

B. If the City Manager or his or her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, he or she shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. Prevailing Wages
A. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by and in accordance with the requirements of Labor Code Sections 1720 et. seq. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute by this Consultant from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies -3-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $50.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any sub-contractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement.

B. Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html.

8. Ownership and Maintenance Of Documents
A. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of two (2) years after receipt of final payment.

B. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City Manager, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
-4-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A, without the written consent of the Consultant.

9. Indemnification
A. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. In connection with its design professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”), with respect to any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense (collectively “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property which to the extent arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or any of its officers, employee, sub-consultants, or agents in the performance or its professional services under this Agreement.

In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault as set forth in California Civil Code 2782.8.

B. Other Indemnities. In connection with any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively, “Damages” hereinafter) not covered by Paragraph 9.A. above, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims, including but not limited to, Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant’s duty to defend pursuant to this Section 9.B. shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions or Indemnitees.

10. Insurance Requirements
A. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
a) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
-5-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
b) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
c) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker’s compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. d) Professional liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant’s profession. 2) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
a) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
c) Worker’s Compensation as required by the State of
California; Employer’s Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.
d) Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. 3) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed $25,000 unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in his sole discretion.

B. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (“Additional Insured”) shall be covered as insured’s as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Additional Insureds. -6-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Additional Insureds. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the Additional Insureds shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Additional Insureds.
4) The Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that the insurer shall endeavor to provide thirty (30) days’ prior written notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City prior to any action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits.
6) Within one (1) business day following receipt by Consultant of any notice correspondence or notice, written or oral, of an action or proposed action to suspend, void, cancel or otherwise reduce in coverage or in limits of the required insurance, Consultant shall notify City of such action or proposed action.

C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.

D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City’s forms, the Consultant’s insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications.

E. Modifications. City Manager may, with the consent of the City Attorney, waive the provisions of this paragraph or provided for other forms of insurance as may be necessary to enable the City to receive adequate insurance protection as contemplated in this section.

11. Independent Contractor
A. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its -7-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City.

Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

B. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

12. Legal Responsibilities
The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

13. Confidentiality; Release Of Information
A. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City’s prior written authorization.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

14. Assignment
The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. City consents to the use of the sub-consultants described in Exhibit A to this Agreement provided the costs of such sub-consultants shall be borne by the Consultant and shall not exceed the costs described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.

15. General Provisions
A. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of -8-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice.

Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.

To City: City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant: Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc.
462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 107
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Attention: Yale Hooper, Principal

B. Licenses. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

C. Governing Law; Venue
1) The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. 2) Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Jurupa Valley. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court’s judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

D. Prohibited Interest. No officer, or employee of the City of Jurupa Valley who has participated in the development of this Agreement or its administration shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant’s sub-contractors, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City Council or City of Jurupa Valley has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant’s sub- Consultants on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. -9-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
F. Time is of Essence. In carrying out the provisions of this Agreement, both parties acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence.

G. Authority To Execute This Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

-10-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

Chris Barajas, Mayor

ATTEST:

Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

CONSULTANT

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

[SIGNATURES OF PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF CORPORATION OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED FOR CORPORATION; SIGNATURE OF MANAGING MEMBER REQUIRED FOR LLC OR LLP]

-11-
12774-0001\1689919v1.doc

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant will be responsible for performing landscape architectural services on an “on-call or as-needed” basis during the term of the agreement. Consultant will work with City staff to complete assignments in the most cost-effective and responsive manner. Consultant will work with City staff to complete assignments in the most cost-effective and responsive manner.

Assignments will vary in size and work tasks may consist of development plan review, capital improvement projects, Community Facilities Districts (CFD)/Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts (LLMD) services, landscape design services, and inspection services.

Services may include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Assist in developing City's Urban Forest Management Program • Assist in developing City's tree removal/planting policy and schedule • Conceptual designs
• Presentations and renderings
• Provide cost estimates
• Construction support services
• Trees and other plant evaluation
• Landscape inspection services
• Plan checking

Consultant’s proposal to provide the services dated April 20, 2022 attached. 1 City of Jurupa Valley
Request for Proposals for
On-Call Landscape Architectural Services
Principal Contact:

Yale Hooper, Principal-in-Charge
Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc.

Tel. 619.294.8484.x20
Mobile: 619.992.1679
[email protected]
APRIL 20, 2022
2 Table of Contents
Section Page
Cover Letter .............................................................................01 Organization / Company Profile ..............................................04 Organizational Chart ...............................................................06 Key Personnel Resumes ..........................................................07 Description of Services ............................................................16 Additional Forms .....................................................................22 Relevant Experience Sheets ....................................................33 3 April 20, 2022
City of Jurupa Valley
Public Works Department
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
ATTN: Paul Toor, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Re: RFP for On-Call Landscape Architectural Services
Dear Mr. Toor:

We are pleased to submit our qualifications and rate proposal to provide On-Call Landscape Architectural Services for the City of Jurupa Valley. As a consulting landscape architectural firm, VDLA has served in on-call consulting roles for various entities, including Cities, County agencies, school districts, the Federal government and military, water districts and others.

VDLA has been providing on-call landscape architectural services as contracted with Jurupa Valley since 2016, and prior to that, we performed services for Jurupa Valley under our contract with the Riverside County Transportation & Land Management Agency.

VDLA is uniquely qualified for Landscape Architectural Design, Plan Checking and Inspection Services, and has an expressed interest in serving the City of Jurupa Valley.

Our experienced staff that will be assigned to this contract are already familiar with policies and procedures inherent to successfully performing these services.

VDLA is highly experienced, with our core staff having worked together for over 20 years.

Our staff holds credentials such as licensed landscape architects, certified irrigation designers and auditors, and recycled water site supervisors.

We take pride in providing professional services to public entities, where we offer creative solutions and a sensible, cost-effective approach. Please see the personnel resumes herein for the staff that will be committed to the City of Jurupa Valley throughout the duration of this contract.

Sincerely,
Yale Hooper, Principal-in-Charge, CID, CLIA, RWSS
Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. (dba VDLA Landscape Architects) 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 107
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Email: [email protected]
Phone (mobile): 619.992.1679
Landscape Architecture
Planning
Water Management
Graphic Communications
462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 107, Solana Beach, CA 92075-2042 | Tel: 619.294.8484 | Fax: 619.574.0626 | Web: www.vdla.us Principals: Mitch Phillippe, CA LLA #3781 | Yale Hooper, CID, CLIA, RWSS Associates: Ling Chan, CA LLA #5435, LEED AP | Denise Armijo, ASLA | Brett Allen, ASLA, CA LLA #6595, CID, CLIA, RWSS 4 Organization / Company Profile
A. Business Name and Legal Business Status
Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. (doing business as VDLA Landscape Architects) 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 107
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Riverside County Field Office:
18581 Old Town Front Street
Temecula, CA 92590
VDLA is a California S-Corporation
B. Non-Profit Status
Not Applicable
C. Company Overview

1. Firm History
Van Dyke Landscape Architects (VDLA) is a certified small business concern founded in 1972. For 50 years VDLA has specialized in landscape architecture, urban planning and design, irrigation design and water resource management services, graphic communication and community outreach services. The firm also serves as a technical advisor and provides as-needed consulting design services, independent/outside plan check review and field inspection services to a variety of public agencies and water districts throughout the Southern California region.

2. Number of Years in Business (50 years total)
• Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. (dba VDLA): Incorporated in 2006 (16 years) • Van Dyke LLP: 2001 to 2006 (5 years)
• Van Dyke & Associates: 1972-1980, 1984-2001 (25 years) • Van Dyke/Halsey: 1980-1984 (4 years)
VDLA has been providing as-needed consulting design services, independent/outside plan check review and field inspection services throughout the Southern California since 2006 (16 years).

Firm Certifications
CA DGS Small Business #1188980
California DIR #1000063862
5 Organization / Company Profile

3. Company Hierarchy
• Yale Hooper - President / Principal
Certified Irrigation Designer #45214
Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA)
Recycled Water Site Supervisor (RWSS)

• Mitch Phillippe - Vice President / Principal
CA Licensed Landscape Architect #3781
• Brett Allen - Associate
CA Licensed Landscape Architect #6595
Certified Irrigation Designer #58129
Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor (CLIA)
Recycled Water Site Supervisor (RWSS)
• Ling Chan - Associate
CA Licensed Landscape Architect #5435

LEED AP
• Denise Armijo - Associate
Note: See Next Page for Organizational Chart for On-Call Services to City of Jurupa Valley

4. Company Size
VDLA staff of 16 employees has a focused interest in providing our clients with technically sound landscape architectural services. Firm Principals Yale Hooper and Mitch Phillippe have been with VDLA for 23 years and 33 years respectively, and our three Associates have all been with VDLA for nearly 20 years.

Proposed Number of Staff to Provide Services: 5

5. Location of Office and Staff Allocation
VDLA Landscape Architects
462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 107
Solana Beach, CA 92075
(16 Staff at this office location)
Riverside County Field Office:
18581 Old Town Front Street
Temecula, CA 92590
(5 Inspection personnel utilize this location as a field office as-needed) D. Financial Interest
“None” - VDLA holds no controlling or financial interest in any other organization, and is not owned or controlled by any other person or organization.
6 Organization Chart
Professional and
Technical Staff
Alexa Hudson
Accounting
Manager
Yale Hooper
Principal -
Quality Control
Manager
Brett Allen
Project
Manager
Ling Chan
Graphics and
Production Manager
Elaine Sitz
Plan
Checker
Patrick Shannon
Landscape
Inspector
Additional Inspection
Staff As-Needed
Additional Plan
Ck Staff As-Needed
Evin Lambert
Project Manager,
Director of
Arboriculture
Jen Wilson
Director of
Horticulture
Angel Cabral
Arbor Care
Consultant
7 Key Personnel Resumes
8 YALE HOOPER | PRINCIPAL
Principal in Charge, Landscape Inspector
(Management Contact Authorized to Sign Agreements)
Mr. Hooper is President of Van Dyke Landscape Architects and serves as Director of Irrigation Services, Construction Administration and Inspections Manager. He will provide Principal level leadership and oversight for the proposed services. He has 20+ years of experience in irrigation design and construction management coordinating with water districts, public agencies and municipalities, civil engineers, industry product manufacturers, and contractors.

Mr. Hooper’s experience in the region provides him with thorough familiarity with regional and local standards and regulations, as well as micro-climates affecting planting and irrigation designs.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
On-Call Landscape Plan Checking & Inspections
City of Jurupa Valley
Oversees VDLA staff who provide a wide range of services including landscape plan checking, landscape site inspections, water management, central control irrigation management/setup and landscape design services.

On-Call Landscape Architect Services
Riverside County Transportation & Land Management Agency Oversees VDLA staff who perform tasked design projects, updating of County standards or ordinances and technical writing services for the County, and for County-maintained right- of-way projects, including streetscape medians, landscaped rights-of-way, and public trails.

On-Call Landscape Plan Checking and Inspections
Riverside County Transportation & Land Management Agency Oversees VDLA staff who perform plan review and plan checking, including project Conditions of Approval, County ordinances and submittals for County maintained landscape projects. Projects range from existing parkways and medians to freeway interchanges.

Mr. Hooper also oversees VDLA services for on-site and off-site landscape inspection services for newly constructed privately maintained sites, and new and existing County maintained sites (LMD, CSA and CFD) and CalTrans Rights of Way. Inspection services include areas maintained by outside contracts.

On-Call Plan Checking
Eastern Municipal Water District
Oversees VDLA staff who perform plan review and plan checking including review of plans for conformance to EMWD submittal and graphic standards. Documents reviewed included Recycled Water Use Exhibits, construction documents for on-site irrigation and related civil plans.

EDUCATION
Irrigation Design
Mesa College, San Diego

EXPERIENCE
24 years with VDLA

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Irrigation
Designer (CID) #45214
Certified Landscape Irriga-
tion Auditor (CLIA)
Recycled Water Site
Supervisor (RWSS)

AFFILIATIONS
Building Industry
Association
Irrigation Association (IA)
EPA Water Sense Partner
Water ReUse Association
American Society of
Agriculture &
Biological Engineers
9 BRETT ALLEN | ASSOCIATE
Project Manager, Landscape Architect Design Manager,
Certified Irrigation Designer | LLA #6595
An Associate of the firm, Mr. Allen will serve as the Project Manager and Landscape Architect Design Manager for this contract. He has significant design experience on prior contracts for VDLA. Mr. Allen has a strong background in landscape architectural design and construction, irrigation design, native and adaptive regional plant materials, planting design, soils and appropriate planting techniques. Mr. Allen also has expertise with large scale irrigation master planning, irrigation design, and construction administration. He has significant experience in preparing designs for parks and public areas, including streetscapes, irrigation point of connection master plans, demand analyses, hydraulic analyses and coordinating this information with multi-disciplinary teams in both the public and private sector. Mr.

Allen’s project management experience includes projects for cities, counties, school districts and private development including park and recreation facilities, libraries, plazas, corporate campuses, streetscapes, roundabouts, public corridor improvements, and public use areas.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
On-Call Landscape Architect Services
Riverside County Transportation & Land Management Agency Mr. Allen has been a Project Manager for on-site and off-site landscape inspection services for newly constructed privately maintained sites, and new and existing County maintained sites (LMD, CSA and CFD) and CalTrans Rights of Way. Inspection services include areas maintained by outside contracts. Mr. Allen also managed design and renovation projects for medians and right-of-way areas within various LMD, CSA or CFD zones.

On-Call Landscape Inspections
City of Jurupa Valley
Mr. Allen has served as a Project Manager and an Inspector for landscape site inspections, water management, central control irrigation management/setup and landscape design services.

Van Buren Boulevard / I-215 Interchange, Riverside, CA
Mr. Allen served as Project Manager for conceptual design options and landscape architectural construction documents for the new Van Buren Boulevard / Interstate 215 interchange. The adjacent March Air Reserve base features a vintage aircraft museum as well as frequent military air traffic that can see the graphic ‘jet’ landscape features from above. The features can also be seen from vehicles passing or exiting the I-215.

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in
Landscape Architecture,
Arizona State University

EXPERIENCE
18 years with VDLA

REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Landscape
Architect State of
California - #6595
Certified Irrigation
Designer #58129
Certified Landscape
Irrigation Auditor
Recycled Water
Site Supervisor

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of
Landscape Architects
(Past President, San
Diego Chapter)
Building Industry
Association
10 ELAINE SITZ | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Plan Checker | LLA #6595
Ms. Sitz is a Plan Check Specialist with the firm and has over 30 years of project experience, encompassing institutional projects, multi-family housing and residential community development, park and recreation facilities, corporate office site design, and public agency projects. From 1986-2015, Ms. Sitz owned and operated her own landscape architectural business. She adds immense value to the plan checking department at VDLA. Ms. Sitz currently reviews landscape and irrigation projects for multiple agencies for conformance with applicable ordinances and regulations including water conservation ordinances and the required landscape water budget calculations, parking ordinances and sight distance requirements.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
On-Call Landscape Plan Checking
City of Jurupa Valley
Ms. Sitz performs plan check services for the City of Jurupa Valley predominantly for City maintained right-of-way areas and basins. The plan check streamlines irrigation methods and materials and directs applicants toward plant material which is appropriate for the site and coordinates the material and design with existing plant material in the area taking into account the micro-climate of the site, the amount of anticipated foot and vehicular traffic and visibility safety.

On-Call Landscape Plan Checking
Riverside County Transportation & Land Management Agency Ms. Sitz performs off-site plan checks of private and County maintained projects for conformance to County standards, ensuring conformance to RCTLMA submittal and graphic standards, approved landscape concept plan and Conditions of Approval, and verifying that plans conform to Ordinances 348, 460, 461 and 859. Ms. Sitz assists in periodic updates to the standard requirement check lists, standard details and specifications for use by plan checkers and applicants to help streamline the plan checking process.

Ms. Sitz frequently collaborates with applicants to aid in resolution of design issues, inter- departmental coordination, and regular collaboration with County Planning Department, Valley-Wide Parks and Recreation, various CSA’s and water districts.

On-Call Landscape Plan Checking
City of Lancaster
Ms. Sitz reviews landscape plans and verifies that plans conform to City of Lancaster standards. Ms. Sitz has periodically assisted in the development of a standard requirement check list, and electronic approval stamps for use by plan checkers.

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Agriculture in
Landscape Architecture,
Purdue University

EXPERIENCE
30+ years

CERTIFICATIONS
Licensed Landscape
Architect
State of California
- #2585
11 PATRICK SHANNON
Landscape Inspector
Mr. Shannon is a landscape irrigation inspector with over 30 years of experience in the landscape and golf industry. Prior to joining VDLA, Mr. Shannon owned a landscape business and brings a wealth of technical and operational experience to the firm His responsibilities include on-site inspections to verify that installed irrigation, hardscape and landscape conforms to approved landscape plans. Mr. Shannon offers experience in directing daily operations and turf maintenance programs, design and implementation of rebates and renovations, as well as design modifications and preparation of construction documents.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
On-Call Landscape Inspections
Riverside County Transportation & Land Management Agency • Inspector of private and County maintained projects for RCTLMA • Assists in updates to standard requirement checklists, details and specifications • Collaborates with applicants to aid in resolution of design or inspections issues On-Call Landscape Inspections, City of Jurupa Valley
• Inspector of private and Agency maintained projects
• Assists in updates to standard requirement checklists, details and specifications • Collaborates with applicants to aid in resolution of design or inspections issues

EDUCATION
Certification in Golf and
Sports Turf Management
from Cuyamaca College

EXPERIENCE
3 years with VDLA

AFFILIATIONS
Golf Course
Superintendents of
America Association
(GCSAA)
Irrigation Association
12 LING CHAN | ASSOCIATE
Production Manager, Graphics Specialist | LLA #5435
Ms. Chan’s experience includes roadways and streetscapes, corporate site design, civic, institutional and educational facilities, community planning, park and recreation design, open space and habitat preservation, and trails development projects. Ms. Chan is accomplished in the areas of conceptual and site-specific design, planting and hardscape design, creating computer graphics and computer graphic simulations, and preparing materials for public/ community group meetings. She has gained the knowledge and capability to successfully process preliminary and final documents with City and County governments. She is well versed in coordinating and developing plans to meet the needs and requirements of the client, public agencies, and stakeholder group in both the private and public sector.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Yucaipa Uptown Streetscape, Yucaipa, CA
Ms. Chan finalized preliminary design concepts, refined the design to gain final consensus, and produced construction documents for the Yucaipa Blvd. Uptown Streetscape Project.

The project encompasses landscape, hardscape, street furnishings and lighting for approximately four blocks in the downtown business district.

Rancho California Road / Anza Road Roundabout, Temecula, CA Ms. Chan provided conceptual graphics that were prepared to assist the County’s efforts in community consensus building. Landscape design, trail amenities and signage for the proposed roundabouts draws on the Temecula Valley Wine Country Design Guidelines to reflect the unique character of the region. Plantings were selected to support the theme in the adopted Wine Country Community Plan Streetscapes Design Guidelines, as well as abide by requirements of the Citrus / Vineyard Policy Area. 42nd Avenue Streetscapes Renovation, Bermuda Dunes, CA
Ms. Chan provided designs for the new landscape improvements and renovation of existing medians along 42nd Avenue within the City of Bermuda Dunes and was responsible for inventory and assessment of existing planting materials and irrigation system, schematic design, and graphic exhibits for agency meetings.

Van Buren Streetscape Assessment, Riverside, CA
Ms. Chan provided conceptual design options and landscape architectural construction documents for the Van Buren Boulevard / Interstate 215 interchange as well as an assessment of existing medians with conceptual designs. Located adjacent to the March Air Reserve Base, the interchange cloverleaf features drought adaptive Palo Verde trees, earth-tone gravel and cast-in- place concrete panels emulating a jet fighter theme.

Paseo Santa Fe Sign, Vista CA
Ms. Chan provided graphic design, conceptual designs and final construction documents for a new theme archway monument for the Paseo Santa Fe district in downtown Vista, CA working closely with Martin & Libby Structural Engineers to develop the final design and details for the archway monument.

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in
Landscape Architecture
California Polytechnic
University, Pomona

EXPERIENCE
21 years with VDLA

REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Landscape
Architect
State of California - #5435

LEED AP

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of
Landscape Architects
13 Sub-Consultant Personnel
14 As lead arborist, Ms. Lambert focuses solely on arboricultural consulting and helps clients protect their most valuable assets. She graduated with a bachelor’s degree in Environmental Horticulture Science and a minor in Plant Protection Science from California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. Prior to joining Monarch in 2018, Ms. Lambert worked in the tree care industry for eight years. Her background in the roles of both contractor and third-party consultant has given her the opportunity to perform thousands of tree risk assessments, develop tree protection plans for development projects, develop tree policies and multi-year tree care plans for homeowners’ associations, appraise the value of specimen trees, and conduct year round monitoring of the health and structure of native oak and sycamore trees.
• ISA Certified Arborist WE – 9776A
• ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist # 667
• ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified
• ASCA Tree and Plant Appraisal Qualified
• CA Pest Control Adviser #123990 – Cat. A
• CA Qualified Applicator License #127421 – Cat. B
Mr. Davenport is the president of Monarch Environmental. Prior to founding Monarch Environmental, Matt operated a commercial landscape maintenance company and was honored as a top 35 leader under 35 by National Association of Landscape Professionals.
• ISA Certified Arborist WE – 7385A
• ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified
• Certified Water Manager #15775
• Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor #80741
• EPA Water Sense Partner
• C-27 License #563879
Ms. Evin Lambert, Director of Arboriculture
Monarch’s team of arborists have performed thousands of tree assessments throughout California, including level 3 assessments utilizing an IML Resistograph on more than one hundred specimen trees. Monarch’s extensive combined experience has given them the opportunity to help preserve urban forests, as well as enhance the safety and wellbeing of the residents of many communities.

Matt Davenport, President

15 Ms. Wilson was named Director of Horticulture at Monarch in 2019, serving to develop and drive the firm’s horticultural philosophy. Her role includes landscape consulting, staff development, continuing education, and arborist support. With a background in environmental horticulture and landscape design, Ms. Wilson has extensive experience in wholesale/retail nurseries, consultation and design, maintenance, and arboriculture. Prior to joining Monarch, she managed collections at the Huntington Botanical Garden in San Marino, CA for ten years.
• ISA Certified Arborist WE – 13376A
• Qualified Water Efficient Landscaper #1236
Mr. Cabral has over eight years experience in the landscape and tree care industry, working as a tree care consultant, project manager, plant health care manager, branch manager and tree care sales estimator. He has a wide variety of work experience, including eight years as a Fire Explorer for the City of Redlands Fire Dept and over two years as a Firefighter for Cal Fire in the City of Highland. His understanding of how fire poses a huge risk to Southern California landscapes is critical in keeping the Monarch team informed and proactive in fire safety. As an EMS responding to 911 dispatch in San Bernardino for twelve years and a field training officer for American Medical Response, Mr. Cabral is unflappable, swift to take action, and puts his work first.
• ISA Certified Arborist WE – 13969A
• CA Qualified Applicator License #152727
Ms. Jen Wilson, Director of Horticulture:

Mr. Angel Cabral, Arbor Care Consultant:

16 Description of Services
17 Description of Services
A. General Understanding of Requirements in the Scope of Services VDLA is uniquely qualified for Landscape Architectural Design, Plan Checking and Inspection Services, and has an expressed interest in serving the City of Jurupa Valley. Our experienced staff that will be assigned to this contract are already familiar with policies and procedures inherent to successfully performing these services, as VDLA has been providing on-call landscape architectural services to Jurupa Valley (as a sub- consultant to HR Green) since 2016. Prior to that, we performed services for Jurupa Valley under our contract with the Riverside County Transportation & Land Management Agency.

VDLA has the capacity to perform all of the services listed in the RFP in-house, with the exception of developing the City’s Urban Forest Management Plan, and with certain aspects of the City’s tree removal / planting policy and schedule. For these last two items, we have added Monarch Environmental as a sub-consultant to our team. The Monarch Environmental team of arborists have extensive combined experience including development of Urban Forest Management Programs and tree removal assessments and policies.

VDLA is an experienced consultant that strives to prevent problems from arising by being pro-active and identifying potential problems before they become an issue in the performance of a contract. Clear communication and a detail-oriented approach has been a tenet of our success in providing on-call services to public agencies. Our track record of maintaining contracts long term speaks to the success of this approach. 18 Description of Services

1. Work Plan and 2. Work Reporting Mechanisms
Landscape Design Services Assignments
VDLA management meets monthly to assess overall trends and staffing needs. Internal staff meetings are held on a weekly basis. Planning and allocation of work assignments assures adequate staffing and compliance with schedules. Our management approach is summarized below:

1. Meet with City staff to review each task order to determine project goals, scope and schedule.

2. Prepare detailed scopes of work and task-based line item fee proposals, including gathering and managing sub-consultant proposals and agreements

3. Negotiate final scope and fees, receive Notice to Proceed

4. Organize work assignments, deliverables and milestones in overall schedule with our team including sub- consultant firms

5. Hold weekly or bi-weekly team meetings utilizing Microsoft Teams or similar software

6. Attend in-person meetings when necessary

7. Meetings with City project managers or staff will be scheduled for key milestones, or more often if desired.

8. For instance, the City project manager can participate in the weekly or bi-weekly team meetings if desired.

9. Perform detailed Quality Control for work products, including coordination of our sub-consultant team drawings and bid documents into cohesive and thoroughly plan-checked deliverables to the City

10. VDLA Internal Project Tracking is handled in a live Google Document for up to date project information, which includes:
* project or task order name, job number
* project manager and staff assigned to project
* key tasks with due dates for assigned staff
* quality control review dates for internal and sub-consultant work products * Client review milestones
* Client delivery due dates
19 Description of Services

1. Work Plan and 2. Work Reporting Mechanisms (continued) Landscape Inspections
Upon receipt of request for landscape inspection services, and within two (2) business days, VDLA (Consultant) shall:

1. Upon receipt of inspection requests, VDLA inspectors will review project plans and (if applicable) Conditions of Approval, and will coordinate a date for performing the inspection within the City’s required time frame (typically within 48 hours of receipt).

2. For regular periodic inspections of City-maintained “zones” or specific maintenance areas by various outside maintenance contractors, VDLA inspectors will set up a pre-determined schedule with the City to perform weekly, monthly or bi-monthly inspections. If desired, VDLA can also provide review of contractor submittals for new installation projects.

3. For projects just beginning construction, a pre-construction meeting will be set up for team review of project requirements and inspection milestones. Subsequent inspections typically begin with an open trench inspection to visually inspect all irrigation systems, including sleeve depths, locations and materials, static pressure of the mainlines, soil test results, valve installation, lateral lines, joint connections, etc.

VDLA utilizes an appropriate inspection checklist, and documents any deficiencies on a triplicate form which is signed by the contractor, acknowledging their understanding of the corrections. A copy is provided to each entity at the site.

4. The second new construction inspection typically is a post-inspection performed at 100% completion of the project to verify that irrigation, planting or other hardscape / amenity elements comply with the approved plans & specifications, and that all previous deficiencies have been satisfactorily addressed. Once all corrections have been made, VDLA notifies the City that any “conditions” may be cleared and the project turned over. The third inspection (if required) is the bond release inspection.

This is a simple inspection to verify the site has been maintained properly and there is no damage to the landscape or hardscape improvements.

5. Projects may also be tracked through a tracking sheet which documents progress with color coded dates. Projects with multiple meters (Points of Connection) are inspected and tracked per POC.

6. Checklists and inspections for larger projects are provided per irrigation water meter or Point of Connection so that when conditions have been satisfied, any associated landscape areas may be “finaled” and a maintenance period started, or phases cleared for that meter without being held up by other non-compliant areas of the project.

7. VDLA will coordinate as necessary with a developer, contractor or agency personnel to conduct project turnovers and clear conditions in a timely fashion.

20 Description of Services

1. Work Plan and 2. Work Reporting Mechanisms (continued) Landscape Plan Checking Typical Review Items

1. Review and approve Conceptual Landscape Plan by applicant.

2. Landscape Plan Cover Sheet and Title Block.

3. Landscape Irrigation Plans (per Ord. 348, 460, 461, & 859), IA standards,and ET requirements.

4. Landscape Planting Plans (per Ord. 348, 460, 461, & 859), WUCOLS & Sunset zones, proper location.

5. Landscape Irrigation Details and Specifications. Landscape Planting Details and Specifications.

6. Verify Maximum Allowable Water Allowance (MAWA). “California Friendly” planting palette.

7. Plans are aligned with Riverside County TLMA Comprehensive Landscape Guidelines and Standards.

8. Verify Maintenance Responsibility.

9. Line of Sight conditions.

10. Consistency with other planned improvements.

11. Irrigation System designed with velocities less than 5 feet per second (FPS) or 7 fps brass/copper.

Landscape Plan Checking Work Flow and Reporting Items
Upon receipt of first plan check submittal documents, and within ten (10) business days, Landscape Plan Check Consultant (Consultant) shall:

1. Review for completeness of submittal. Document any submittal deficiencies and advise the City as necessary. Identify any additional reference materials required for a thorough plan check, such as related off-site improvement plans, maintenance issues, approved landscape conceptual plan, studies, or memoranda.

2. Review project with respect to the relationship between the on- and off-site improvements in order to achieve an understanding of the overall project concept.

3. Review conditions of approval. Review plan submittal documents for conformance with these conditions.

4. Compare construction documents against the approved landscape conceptual plan for landscape improvement for tree layout, plant material density, overall landscape improvement compared to landscape conceptual plan. Compare construction documents against approved landscape conceptual plans and approved conditions to verify street widths,sidewalk type and location, trail location and width, right-of-way line, and any identified or other potential discrepancies found within the construction documents or existing approved conditions . Notify City of any identified or potential discrepancies.

5. Conduct detailed review of the plans based on the City’s plan check protocol, professional landscape judgment and experience and industry standards. This review includes verification of compliance with City Ordinance 460, 461, 499, and 859. In addition, report studies, and other supporting documentation are reviewed for accuracy and appropriateness.
21 Description of Services

1. Work Plan and 2. Work Reporting Mechanisms (continued) City’s Urban Forest Management Program and Tree Removal / Planting Policy & Schedule VDLA has added the expertise of Monarch Environmental to our team for their experience in creating Urban Forest Management Programs and the science and practice of Arboriculture. Since 2008, Monarch Environmental has built a strong reputation by setting clear expectations and delivering results. Monarch has managed city tree and enhancement projects, as well as extensive work with homeowner associations. Monarch’s team of arborists have performed thousands of tree assessments throughout California, including level 3 assessments utilizing an IML Resistograph or PiCus 3 Sonic Tomograph hundreds of specimen trees. Their extensive combined experience has given Monarch the opportunity to help preserve their clients’ urban forests, as well as the safety and wellbeing of the residents of many communities.

Developing comprehensive tree policies and urban forest management plans serve to establish common goals, promote good maintenance practices, and facilitate budgeting and record keeping for a community or for City-wide programs. The primary objectives of the policies include the following:
• Develop recommended tree palettes and urban forest population goals, paying special attention to species diversity, expected lifespan of existing trees, and projected maintenance needs. • Develop planting plans for under-forested areas as well as tree replacement projects, being careful to minimize the potential for risk, property damage, litter nuisance or excessive maintenance costs. • Develop and maintain detailed GIS tree inventories for planning, budgeting, record-keeping and management purposes.
• Clearly define best management practices for tree pruning and health care, following ISA and ANSI standards. • Develop tree removal criteria and removal authorization processes.

Monarch Environmental Company Background
Monarch Environmental, Inc. is an independent third-party horticultural consulting company established in 2008.

Monarch provides vendor accountability, horticultural expertise and practical solutions our clients. Our distinguished team consist of experts who are both experienced in the field, and educated in the classroom. Monarch Environmental services include contract management, horticultural assessments, project management, and a variety of consulting arborist services such as tree inventories, tree management plans, tree protection plans, tree palettes, and Level 2 and 3 Tree Risk Assessments.
22 Signature Page, Non-Collusion Declaration,
References, Licenses, Evidence of Insurability
Request for Proposals for On-call Landscape Architectural Services

11 RFP for Landscape Architect Services

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

PROPOSER’S SIGNATURE

ON-CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

The undersigned, having become familiar with the local conditions affecting the cost of work, hereby proposes to furnish all management, tools, supplies, equipment, material, transportation, and labor service necessary to perform and all work performed under any contract resulting from this proposal.

By submission of this proposal, the undersigned certifies that this proposal has been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement as to any matter relating to this proposal with any other proposer or competitor.

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Request for Proposals for On-call Landscape Architectural Services

15 RFP for Landscape Architect Services

EXHIBIT C

LIST OF REFERENCES

ON-CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

PROPOSER: ________________________________________________

Following are the names, addresses and telephone numbers for three (3) public agencies for which PROPOSER has performed similar work within the past two (2) years:

1. Name and Address of Agency

Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project

Contract Amount Date Completed

Type of Work

2. Name and Address of Agency

Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project

Contract Amount Date Completed

Type of Work

3. Name and Address of Agency

Name, Title, and Telephone Number of Person Familiar with Project

Contract Amount Date Completed

Type of Work

Request for Proposals for On-call Landscape Architectural Services 16 RFP for Landscape Architect Services

EXHIBIT D

REQUIRED SUBCONSULTANT INFORMATION
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
NAME LICENSE NO. AND CLASSIFICATION
TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK CONTRACTED:

ADDRESS

CITY, ZIP
Mr. Matt Davenport, Monarch Environmental ISA Certified Arborist WE-7385A 949.207.3770
34237 Via Santa Rosa
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624
Ms. Evin Lambert, Monarch Environmental ISA Certified Arborist WE-9776A 949.207.3770
949.207.3770
34237 Via Santa Rosa
34237 Via Santa Rosa
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624
Mr. Angel Cabral, Monarch Environmental ISA Certified Arborist WE-13969A Consulting Arborist services
such as: tree health and risk
assessments, development of
urban forest management
plan and tree removal and
planting policies; inspections
of irrigation installations
Consulting Arborist services
such as: tree health and risk
assessments, development
of urban forest management
plan and tree removal and
planting policies
Consulting Arborist services
such as: tree health and risk
assessments, development of
urban forest management
plan and tree removal and
planting policies
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEOFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDLSUBRLTR INSDWVD
PRODUCER CONTACTNAME: FAXPHONE(A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext):E-MAILADDRESS:INSURER A :INSURED INSURER B :INSURER C :INSURER D :INSURER E :INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBERPOLICY EFFPOLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCELIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIABEXCESS LIABWORKERS COMPENSATIONAND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE$DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADEOCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence)MED EXP (Any one person)$PERSONAL & ADV INJURY$GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE$PRO-POLICYLOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER: $COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT$(Ea accident)ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)$OWNEDSCHEDULEDBODILY INJURY (Per accident)$AUTOS ONLYAUTOSHIREDNON-OWNEDPROPERTY DAMAGE$AUTOS ONLYAUTOS ONLY(Per accident)$OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCECLAIMS-MADEAGGREGATE$DEDRETENTION$ PEROTH-STATUTEERE.L. EACH ACCIDENTE.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE$If yes, describe underE.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGENAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / NN / A(Mandatory in NH)
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORETHE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED INACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIODINDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THISCERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THISCERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIESBELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement onthis certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGESCERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDERCANCELLATION
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03)

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEDATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$$$$
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
3/17/2022
License # 0E67768(619) 788-5795 50206(619) 574-628813056Van Dyke Landscape Architects462 Stevens Ave., Suite 107Solana Beach, CA 9207511150 A 2,000,000XXPSB00024089/1/20219/1/20221,000,000Cont Liab/Sev of Int10,0002,000,0004,000,0004,000,000Deductible02,000,000A XPSB00024089/1/20219/1/2022No Co. Owned Autos 2,000,000A PSE00017469/1/20219/1/20222,000,0000A XPSW00021439/1/20219/1/20221,000,000N 1,000,0001,000,000BProf Liab/Clms MadePAAEP01028039/1/2021Per Claim2,000,000BDed.: $10k Per ClaimPAAEP01028039/1/20219/1/2022Aggregate4,000,000RE: All OperationsPacific Bluff is Additional Insured with respect to General/Hired & Non-Owned Auto Liability per the attached endorsement as required by written contract. Insurance is Primary and Non-Contributory. Waiver of Subrogation applies to General Liability and Workers' Compensation.30 Days Notice of Cancellation with 10 Days Notice for Non-Payment of Premium in accordance with the policy provisions.

Pacific Bluff Management5326 Mt. Alifan DriveSan Diego, CA 92111 VANDYKE-03MAUJEN
IOA Insurance Services4370 La Jolla Village DriveSuite 600San Diego, CA 92122Ali [email protected] Insurance CompanyArch Insurance Company X9/1/2022

X XXXXX XXXX

23 Experience
24 KEY FEATURES:
• As-Needed Design Services
• Inspections
• Plan Checking
REFERENCE:

Mark Hughes, RCTLMA
Principal Engineering Unit
Supervisor
T: 951-955-6767
Email: [email protected]
Riverside County Transportation & Land
Management Agency (RCTLMA)

RIVERSIDE, CA
VDLA has been providing as-needed landscape architectural services to the Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency (RCTLMA) since 2007. Essential to these services is a close working relationship with County departments and the ability to interface with plan applicants and contractors during inspections.

As-Needed Design Services
2009 to present
Project scopes range from a new freeway interchange to renovations to existing medians. All designs focus on low maintenance and low water and/or native plantings; some work around existing plant material to remain. Services include site assessments, schematic designs, graphic exhibits for agency meetings, construction documents for hardscape, landscape and irrigation, and cost estimates.

Inspection Services (2009 to present)
Van Dyke Landscape Architects works closely with RCTLMA to inspect existing right-of-way areas, providing assessments of planting and irrigation systems and efficacy of current maintenance crews. This scope also includes inventory of plant material, irrigation controllers and equipment and electric utilities. Recommendation are given to increase water conservation through plant material choice, irrigation upgrades and maintenance practices.

Plan Check Services (2007 to present)
Scope includes review of plans for conformance to RCTLMA submittal and graphic standards, approved landscape concept plan and Conditions of Approval, and verification that plans conform to Ordinances 460, 461 and 859.

Under this scope Van Dyke has developed a standard requirement check list for use by plan checkers and applicants to help streamline the plan checking process. Services also include meeting with applicants to aid in resolution of design issues and to ensure regulatory conformance and inter-departmental coordination.

RCTLMA Comprehensive Landscape Guidelines & Standards (2009) Van Dyke Landscape Architects was contracted to develop a comprehensive document to guide design and submittals within the agency’s jurisdiction. The process required careful review of existing guidelines, standards and regulations and identification of conflicts or deficiencies within existing documents. Van Dyke then worked closely with multiple disciplines within the agency to produce a comprehensive document which outlined current standards for design and submittals, including clarifying and/or prioritizing any conflicts between regulations. Scope included guiding water conservation standards as well as producing standard details and titleblocks, specifications and a California Friendly Plant List.

1 County of Riverside
Guide to California Friendly
Landscaping

Prepared by:

Riverside County Planning Department

In association with:

October 1, 2007

25 KEY FEATURES:
• Landscape Design Services
• Landscape Site Inspections
• Irrigation Water Management
REFERENCE:

Tina York, PE
Development Services Manager
HR Green
(951) 255-3478
[email protected]
VDLA has been working with the City of Jurupa Valley since 2014, providing a wide range of services including landscape plan checking, landscape site inspections, irrigation water management, central control irrigation management and setup, and landscape design services. Specific tasks include: tree trimming inventory, point of connection (POC) / Electrical / Water Meter Inventory Maintenance Inspections. .

City of Jurupa Valley

JURUPA VALLEY , CA

26 KEY FEATURES:
• Plan Checking
• Standards Development
• As-Needed Design Services
REFERENCE:

John Wuerth
Civil Engineering Assistant
T: 951-928-3777 Ex.4334
Email: [email protected]
Eastern Municipal Water District
On-Call Services

PERRIS, CA
EMWD Plan Check Services
2006 to 2009 and from 2012 to Present
Scope includes review of plans for conformance to EMWD submittal and graphic standards. Documents reviewed included Recycled Water Use Exhibits, construction documents for on-site irrigation, and, when appropriate, related civil plans.

Plan review included evaluation of projects from the recycled water meter downstream for compliance with regulatory permitting requirements, including environmental, local, regional and state codes, and any applicable conditions of approval for the project.

Scope also includes reviewing Recycled Water Use Exhibits and irrigation plans as related to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Title 22 compliance, Environmental Regulatory Compliance (ERC) and EMWD Recycled Water Guidelines and Specifications. VDLA serves as prime contact for all plan check reviews and schedules and conducts meetings with the applicants and their design team, Cities and County of Riverside personnel, as well as EMWD staff, including Operations & Maintenance Department, Environmental & Regulatory Compliance Department, Engineering Department Point of Service Engineers, and the Water Conservation Department.

During the plan and exhibit review process, proposed pipeline size requirements and limits are reviewed, locations of existing and proposed facilities are verified using EB Web and SmallWorld software. VDLA also provides input and processes data from plans into CityView and Sport programs for other department uses. Our staff also reviews EMWD’s AutoCAD standards in preparation for converting files to GIS.

VDLA also performs as-built drawing review for EMWD conformance, completing and processing the meter release paperwork, and closing out the project Work Order once the EMWD inspector indicates the construction has been completed.

Part of the VDLA scope included preparation of sample / typical planting and irrigation designs for residential homeowners within the EMWD jurisdiction.