Agenda — Jurupa Valley City Council, November 17, 2022 (part 1 of 3)

Page - 1 -

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, November 17, 2022
Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

1. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Leslie Altamirano, Mayor Pro Tem
● Lorena Barajas Bisbee, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member

2. INVOCATION

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.

B. A member of the public who wishes to sp eak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.

C. If the Meeting is conducted via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e), the public may submit comments to the City Council via email or via telephone prior to the Mayor calling the item. Email comment shall be sent to:

[email protected]. Telephone comments may be made by calling (951) 332- 6464, Ext. 140. Email and telephone comments are subject to the same rules as in-person comments.

D. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

E. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.

Page - 2 -

4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

5. PRESENTATIONS
A. RECOGNITION TO KEITH CLARKE
B. INTRODUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION/FINANCE STAFF

6. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

7. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

8. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN CO MMUNITY ENERGY - JOINT

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND TECHNICAL
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF NOVEMBER 9, 2022

2. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RI VERSIDE COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS – ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 2022
B. MAYOR PRO TEM LESLIE ALTAMIRANO

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY

REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 7, 2022
C. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERS IDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION
COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 2022
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific it em until it appears on an agenda.

Page - 3 -

2. UPDATE ON THE NORTHWEST TRANSPORTA TION NOW
COALITION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 10, 2022

3. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2022

4. UPDATE ON THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION

REDUCTION REVIEW CO MMITTEE MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 17, 2022
D. COUNCIL MEMBER GUILLERMO SILVA

1. UPDATE ON THE NORTHWEST MOSQUITO AND VECTOR
CONTROL DISTRICT MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 2022

9. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. NOVEMBER 3, 2022 REGULAR MEETING

11. CONSENT CALENDAR (COMMENTS ON CONSENT AGENDA TAKEN HERE) (All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved in one motion unless a Councilmember requests a separate action on a specific item on the Consent Calendar. If an item is removed from the Consent Calendar, it will be discussed individually and acted upon separately.) A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION T O WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN

THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.

B. REAFFIRM FINDINGS AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO MEET IN

WHOLE OR IN PART BY TELECONFERENCING UNDER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DURING THE COVID -19

STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCY
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -106, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE

CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH A TELECONFERENCE OPTION

FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC DUE TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY AND THE CITY
COUNCIL’S DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
Page - 4 -
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e), AND MAKING FINDINGS

AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME
C. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING
JUNE 30, 2022 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023
Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file the quarterly investment reports for Fiscal Year 2021/2022 quarter ending June 30, 2022 and Fiscal Year 2022/2023 quarter ending September 30, 2022.

D. REIMBURSEMENT TO CALPORTLAND COMPANY FOR GUARDRAIL

INSTALLATION ON RUBI DOUX BOULEVARD IN TH E CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY
Requested Action: That the City Council approve reimbursement to CalPortland for the guardrail installation on Rubidoux Boulevard and authorize the City Manager to release payment for $40,000.00.

E. ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION AT THE HALL AVENUE

AND AGUA MANSA ROAD INTERSECTION (AGUA MANSA

COMMERCE PREDEV, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes including public utility and public services purposes over the area as shown on Exhibit B of DED22-003.

2. Authorize the Director of Pub lic Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication of DED22-003.

F. CZA22005 - INITIATE A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT PERTAINING

TO THE PROCESSING AND TERMS OF EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT)

APPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

APPROVALS
Requested Action: That the City Council, by motion, initiate a zoning text amendment pertaining to the processing and terms of extension of time (EOT) applications for Community Development Department approvals.

12. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FRO M THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

Page - 5 -

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER M ASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 22051: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 FOR 118 CONDOMINIUMS ON APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT

THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH
STREET; (APN: 162 -230-012); AND APPROVING A PREVIOUS

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FINDING THAT NO FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APPLICANT: CENTURY

COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC)

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and adopt Resolution No. 2022-107, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF 118 CONDOMINIU MS ON
APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST

CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH STREET AND A

PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FINDING THAT NO

FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER T HE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APN: 162-230-012)

B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES AND THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE

1. Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing, receive public comments and close the public hearing.

2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-108, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS
AND DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS T O THE 2022

CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY BECAUSE

OF LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL

CONDITIONS

3. That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-18, entitled:

Page - 6 -

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.05, ADOPTION OF
CONSTRUCTION CODES, TO TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA

VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
(1) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, (2) THE 2022
CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE, (3) THE 2022
CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, (4) THE 2022
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, (5) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA
PLUMBING CODE, (6) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL
CODE, (7) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, (8) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUIL DING STANDARDS CODE, (9) THE
2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCE STANDARDS CODE, (10) THE
2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, (11) THE 2021

INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE,

TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS
TO SUCH CODES AND AMENDING CHAPTER 8.10, ADOPTION
OF FIRE CODES, TO TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022

EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, TOGETHER WITH

CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS TO SUCH CODE

C. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 21143: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 21003; CHANGE OF ZONE (CZ) NO. 21004; WAIVER OF MINIMUM NINE -ACRE AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARD; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO.
38151 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) NO. 22089; PROJECT:
“MADONE COLLECTION” PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
- SUBDIVIDE 6.92 ACRES OF LAND INTO 35 LOTS FOR SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED HOMES; LOCATION: 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN:
183-030-014); (APPLICANT: TK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC)

1. That the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2022-109, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING

AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND APPROVING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21003, WAIVER OF MINIMUM NINE-

ACRE AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARD, SITE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 22089, AND TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 38151 TO PERMIT A SCHEDULE “A” SUBDIVISION OF
APPROXIMATELY 6.92 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN: 183 -030-014) INTO THIRTY -FIVE (35) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, COMMON AREAS,

PRIVATE STREETS, AND A RETENTION BASIN

Page - 7 -

2. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2022-21, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGING THE
ZONE OF APPROXIMATELY 6.92-ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN: 183-030-014) FROM A-1 (LIGHT AGRICULTURE) TO R -4 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ,

AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA

D. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 21334: REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, REVISED SITE

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,

DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY,

VARIANCE, ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY APRO VED

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AND COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT TO MODIFY A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 231,000

SQUARE-FOOT SHOPPING CENTER, ADD ALCOHOL SALES FOR ON-
& OFF -SITE CONSUMPTION, AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT

CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON MISSION BOULEVARD AND
PYRITE STREET (APNS: 171-020-001, -002, -025); (APPLICANT: PYRITE

INVESTMENTS, LLC)
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and adopt Resolution No. 2022-110, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O F THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER APP LICATION NO.
21334 CONSISTING OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 37890, REVISED PERMIT NO. 1 TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 20018,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 22002, DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 22003, AND VARIANCE NO. 22003, TO PERMIT THE CONSTR UCTION OF AN APPROXI MATE 147,000

SQUARE FOOT DEPARTME NT STORE WITH ALCOHO L SALES FOR

OFF-SITE CONSUMPTION , AND ALCOHOL SALES FOR ON -

PREMISES CONSUMPTION AT A FUTURE RESTAUR ANT, AND
OTHER SITE MODIFICATIONS ON APPROXIMATELY 31.7 ACRES OF

REAL PROPERTY LOCATE D ON THE NORTHEAST C ORNER OF

MISSION BOULEVARD AN D PYRITE STREET, APP ROVING AN

ADDENDUM TO THE CERT IFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT AND APPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGREE MENT WITH

THE DEVELOPER REGARDING THE DESI GN AND CONSTRUCTION
OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS (APNS: 171-020-001, -002, -025)

Page - 8 -

14. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. APPOINTMENTS TO FILL TWO UNEXPIRED VACANCIES ON THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Requested Action: That Mayor Chris Barajas and Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano appoint one member each to serve on the Community Development Advisory Committee for a term , which shall expire on March 21, 2023, or until their successors are appointed and s worn-in, whichever is later and which nominations shall be ratified by a majority vote of the entire City Council, pursuant to Chapter 2.36 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

15. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

16. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

17. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of December 1, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be m ade available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.A
-1-

MINUTES

OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
November 3, 2022

2. INVOCATION was given by members of the Buddhist Meditation Center.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Lorena Barajas Bisbee.

4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Agenda.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

5. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES -
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
The City’s Pet of the Month for November, a 2 month-old male brindle pit mix, named “Snickers” was introduced to the Council. Anyone interested in giving this available pet a home is invited to contact the City’s Animal Control Services Department at https://www.rcdas.org. In light of the upcoming Veterans Day holiday, John Welsh , Animal Services Chief , announced that a doption fees are always waived for active duty personnel in the military branches and for Veterans.

B. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BATTALION CHIEFS
Fire Chief Bill Otterman introduced the City’s newest Fire Battalion Chiefs, Chris Tate and Alex Paul.

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-

6. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
The City Clerk announced that she received several emails regarding the proposed Wineville Marketplace development and those emails will be made part of the public record.

Robert Garcia, representing the J urupa Unified School District, thanked the City Council and staff for a great two years, especially Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee. He thanked the Council for their cooperative working relationship and for always doing what is best for the community.

Melissa Ragle, Board President, Jurupa Unified School District, announced the JUSD’s new “Culture of Kindness” campaign, which will highlight efforts across the district to raise awareness about the importance of empathy and thoughtfulness.

Joanna Medina requested that the future Wineville Marketplace development be placed on a future Agenda as there has been ongoing and conflicting information circulating about this development. She stated that the City of Riverside recently adopted a new ordinance, which prohibits camping and storing property in fire-prone areas like the Santa Ana River bottom. She encouraged the Council to adopt a similar ordinance.

7. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Chris Barajas referred to Ms. Medina’s comments and stated that the applicant has not submitted any plans for the proposed Wi neville Marketplace . He added that the ordinance that the City of Riverside just passed is the same ordinance that the City of Jurupa Valley passed two years ago. He announced that Jurupa Valley's first Veterans Celebration Parade is scheduled for Saturday, November 12 , 2022 at 9:00 a.m. He encouraged residents to enjoy the parade as the City shows support for its local Veterans and their families.

Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee announced that the third “Walk with a Doc” event will be held this Saturday, November 5th at Clay Park, 8029 Haven View Dr ive, at 9:00 a.m. The event will allow participants to walk with local phys ician, Dr. Veronica Contreras, while learning about health.

8. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments – Administration & Finance Committee meeting of October 12, 2022.

-3-

B. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors meeting of October 27, 2022.

2. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority meeting of October 28, 2022.

9. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

City Manager Rod Butler announced that City Hall would be closed on Friday, November 11, 2022 in observance of Veterans Day. City Hall will resume regular business hours on Monday, November 1 4, 2022. He reported that the California Department of Toxic Substances has found a new location near Barstow for the Exide battery soil samples that were being stored at the Stringfellow site. He noted how the Council took a strong united stance once they discovered those samples were being stored a t the Stringfellow site. He thanked everyone involved for getting this issue resolved.

Mayor Chris Barajas acknowledged Planning Commissioner Penny Newman for her efforts in alerting the Council about the soil samples that were being stored at Stringfellow.

10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. OCTOBER 20, 2022 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Minutes of the October 20, 2022 regular meeting.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

11. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS INCLUDED IN

THE AGENDA

Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda.

-4-

B. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-19

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-19, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY APPROVING THE “FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND RBE

GLENDORA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

NJK FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY, AND SGS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (PEDLEY ROAD PROJECT),” AND

MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA AND DETERMINATIONS

THAT NO FURTHER CEQA REVIEW IS REQUIRED

C. ORDINANCE NO. 2022-20

Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-20, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLE Y, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MU NICIPAL CODE

PERTAINING TO PARKIN G REQUIREMENTS FOR R ELIGIOUS

INSTITUTION AFFILIAT ED HOUSING DEVELOPME NTS, AND
MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMP TION FROM CEQA UNDER 15061 (B) (3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES

D. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$3,055,469.67

Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated September 29 and October 5, 12 and 19, 2022 as well as the payroll registers, two dated September 30 and October 14, 2022.

E. BIENNIAL REVIEW OF C ONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE AND

RESOLUTION ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE STA NDARD

CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROVISIONS OF CALIF ORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 2, SECTION 18730 AND APPROVING AN

AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the amended Appendix to the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and adopt Resolution No. 2022-105, entitled:

-5-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JUR UPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A PPROVING AND ADOPTIN G AN AMENDED

APPENDIX TO THE CONF LICT OF INTEREST COD E PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974

F. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND TRUE

CLEAN SOURCE, LLC FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES AT CITY

FACILITIES

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement by and between the City of Jurupa Valley and True Clean Source, LLC for an amount not to exceed $55,000.00; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

G. SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING

SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND KEVIN

RYAN FOR AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Kevin Ryan for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) administrative consulting and project management services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

H. APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 36827 LOCATED WEST OF OPAL STREET 195 FEET NORTH OF 45 TH STREET INCLUDING

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF

IMPROVEMENT BONDS (INVESTMENT CITY, LLC)

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 36827 and accept the dedications as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes over all of Lot “A” as shown on Tract Map 36827.
b. Release and relinquishment of vehicular access along Golden West Avenue the owners of Lots 3 through 9 inclusive abutting this road and during such time will have no rights of access except the general easement of travel as shown on Final Tract Map 36827.

-6-

c. Release and relinquishment of vehicular access along Opal Street the owners of Lots 1 and 14 abutting this road and during such time will have no rights of access except the general easement of travel as shown on Final Tract Map 36827.
d. Accept the real property in fee title of Lot 14 for water quality basin as shown on Tract Map 36827.

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 36827; and

3. Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreements and authorize the Mayor to sign them on behalf of the City.

I. CONSIDERATION OF A P UBLIC HIGHWAY UNDERP ASS

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND UNION

PACIFIC RAILROAD COM PANY FOR THE CONSTRU CTION OF A

GRADE SEPARATION CROSSING ON JURUPA ROAD

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Union Pacific Railroad Company for the construction of a grade separation crossing on Jurupa Road and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement i n substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

J. APPROVAL OF AWARD FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING

SERVICES FOR A COMPREHENSIVE CLASSIFICATION AND

COMPENSATION STUDY

Requested Action: That the City Council award the RFP 2023-02 for professional Human Resources Consulting Services to HR Dynamics & Performance Management, Inc., specifically, to conduct the Classification and Compensation Study including but not limited to ensuring compliance with all legal and non - discriminatory requirements i.e. federal, state and local requirements (ADA, FLSA, EEOC, etc.)

K. CITY COUNCIL INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REMOVE THE GENERAL PLAN’S SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY FROM

LAND WITHIN THE AGUA MANSA INDUSTRIAL C ORRIDOR
SPECIFIC PLAN (SP210)

Requested Action: That the City Council initiate proceedings to consider a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to remove the General Plan’s Specific Plan Overlay from the land within the Agua Mansa Industrial Corridor Specific Plan.

-7-

L. APPROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT

FOR SECURITY SERVICES WITH ALL AMERICAN PRIVATE

SECURITY, LLC

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Security Services between the City of Jurupa Valley and All American Private Security, LLC and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

A motion was made by Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Consent Calendar.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

12. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS

14. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. CITY COUN CIL DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL OF 2022 -2023

LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM

Staff Report presented by Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager.

Further discussion followed.

A motion was made by Council Member Lorena Barajas Bisbee, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Legislative Platform for the calendar year of 2022-2023.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, L. Barajas Bisbee, B. Berkson, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

15. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.

-8-

16. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Altamirano encouraged residents to exercise their right to vote on Tuesday, November 8, 2022. She shared where some of the early voting sites and ballot drop off boxes are located.

Council Member Guillermo Silva encouraged his constituents to reach out to him with any questions or concerns. He usually schedules one/one meetings with his constituents on Thursdays. He can be reached at [email protected] Mayor Chris Barajas thanked Pedley Elementary School for participating in “Local Government Day” in Jurupa Valley. He thanked Police Chief Jason Sexton, Fire Chief Bill Otterman and City Clerk Vick Wasko for coordinating such a memorable a day of learning.

17. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m.

The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held November 17, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
Page | 1
S

TAFF REPORT
DAT
E: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO.11.B
REAF

FIRM FINDINGS AUTHORIZING CITY COUNCIL TO MEET IN

WHOLE OR IN PART BY TELECONFERENCING UNDER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) DURING THE COVID -19

STATE AND LOCAL EMERGENCY
RECO

MMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -106, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE CITY

COUNCIL TO BE HELD WITH A TELECONFERENCE OPTION FOR

MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC DUE TO THE
GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY AND THE CITY
COUNCIL’S DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e), AND MAKING FINDINGS AND

DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME

BACKGROUND
At the beginning of the COVID -19 Pandemic, the Governor issued an Executive Order allowing the City Council and other City legislative bodies to conduct their meetings, in whole or in part, by telephone or other electronic means. This Executive Order expired but the Legislature adopted Chapter 165 of 2021 (AB 361) that allows meetings of a legislative body such as the City Council or commissions to be conducted by telephone or other electronic means if certain findings are made concerning an emergency and certain procedures providing for public comment are followed.

RETURN TO AGENDA

-1-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-106

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING

PUBLIC MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE

HELD WITH A T ELECONFERENCE OPTION FOR

MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC
DUE TO THE GOVERNOR’S DECLARATION OF
EMERGENCY AND THE CITY COUNCIL’S

DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e ), AND MAKING

FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE
SAME

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(A) City Council is committed to public access and participation in its meetings and the meetings of all City legislative bodies while balancing the need to conduct public meetings in a manner that reduces the likelihood of exposure to COVID -19 and to support physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
(B) All meetings of the City Council and other City legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City Council and other City legislative bodies conduct their business.
(C) Pursuant to Chapter 165 of the Statutes of 2021 ( Assembly Bill 361 ) legislative bodies of local agencies may hold public meetings via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e), without complying with the requirements of Government Code Section 54953(b)(3), if the legislative body complies with certain enumerated requirements in any of the following circumstances:
1) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing.
2) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. 3) The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. -2-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
(d) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention c ontinue to advise that COVID-19 spreads more easily indoors than outdoors and that people are more likely to be exposed to COVID-19 when they are closer than six feet apart from others for longer periods of time;
(e) Due to the ongoing COVID -19 pandemic and th e need to promote social distancing to reduce the likelihood of exposure to COVID -19, the City Council intend s to hold public meetings with an option for members of those bodies and the public to attend by teleconference pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e) based on the following findings:
1) The declared emergency is still in effect. On March 4, 2020, the Governor declared a State of Emergency in California related to the COVID -19 pandemic (the “Emergency”) and this State of Emergency has not been re pealed. On March 20, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-10 declaring a Local Emergency related to the COVID -19 Pandemic, which Local Emergency has been reaffirmed since that time, including the adoption of Resolution No. 2022-07 on January 20, 2022.
2) California State Department of Public Health and Riverside County have each recommended measures to promote social distancing. Thus, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health still requires that employers provide for physical and social distancing in the workplace. Additionally, the Riverside County Department of Public Health still encourages people at risk for severe illness or death from COVID -19 to take protective measures such as social distancing and, for those not yet fully vaccinated, to physically distance from others whose vaccination status is unknown. The County Health Department also continues to recommend that employers take steps to support physical distancing. 3) The City Council reaffirms the findings made in Res olution No. 2022-08 adopted on January 20, 2022. Staff will also present these findings on a monthly basis in the manner provided by Government Code Section 54953(e) thereafter should the above - mentioned conditions continue.

Section 2. The City Council will continue to hold in person public meetings during the Emergency with required social distancing to the extent practicable. The City Council shall have the option to conduct their meetings in whole or in part via teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e).

Section 3. Staff is hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 4. The City Council will reconsider the above findings within thirty days of adoption of this Resolution.

-3-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 17th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-4-
12774-0001\2619973v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-106 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 17th day of November, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 17th day of November, 2022.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.C
Q

UARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING
JUNE 30, 2022 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023
RECO

MMENDATION
That
the City Council receive and file the quarterly investment reports for Fiscal Year 2021/2022 quarter ending June 30, 2022 and Fiscal Year 2022/2023 quarter ending September 30, 2022.

BACKGROUND
A quar
terly investment report shall be received and filed with the City Council to provide a status of the current investments. City funds continue to be invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund, (LAIF). These reports present the City’s investment portfolio for quarter ending June 30, 2022 and quarter ending September 30, 2022. Quarterly reports include the State of California Pooled Money Investment Account Market Valuation for June 30, 2022 and September 30, 2022.

ANAL
YSIS
To pr
ovide an overview of quarterly investment report for investments held in L AIF with the California State Treasurer, for the quarter ending June 30, 2022 and September 30, 2022.

S
taff will continue to provide City Council with quarterly investment reports.

INANCIAL IMPACT
Thi
s item is for informational purposes only, there is no financial impact.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.D
REI

MBURSEMENT TO CALPORTLAND COMPANY FOR GUARDRAIL

INSTALLATION ON RUBIDOUX BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
RECO

MMENDATION
1) Th
at the City Council approve reimbursement to CalPortland for the guardrail installation on Rubidoux Boulevard and authorize the City Manager to release payment for $40,000.00.

BAC

KGROUND
R
ubidoux Boulevard is a north and south arterial street with a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour. The street is heavily traveled and traffic studies indicate a high volume of accidents on the northern portion of the road. CalPortland Company (“CalPortland”), a construction related company, is located at 1490 Rubidoux Boulevard in Jurupa Valley.

Cal P ortland’s offices are located slightly below the street level where Rubidoux Boulevard begins to curve on a downhill slope and recently had a vehicle veer off into their property. Earlier this year, the City and CalPortland initiated conversations to discuss enhancing safety along Rubidoux Boulevard.

ANAL
YSIS
The C
ity and CalPortland agreed that one of the potential solutions wa s to install a guardrail on the curved portion of the road. While discussing the safety concerns, the City agreed to participate in the installation of the guardrail up to 50% of the construction cost or $40,000 whichever amount is lower. This opportunity allowed for the City to improve roadway safety at half the cost.

C
alPortland took the lead on the project and hired the contractor to install the protective roadway barrier. Prior to commencing work, the plans were reviewed and approved by City staff. The guardrail was installed in July 2022 and a sum of $80,222.40 was paid to

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

the contractor by CalPortland. Public Works staff inspected the guardrail and installation was completed per the approved plans. Now that the project is complete, CalPortland is requesting $40,000.00 reimbursement from the City.

Staff is seeking authorization from the City Council to release payment of $40,000.00 to CalPortland.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

Upon City Council approval, the City will release a payment to CalPortland Company for $40,000.00 from Account Number 200-2000-54150. Funding provision was made in the Public Works Department budget for the Fiscal Year 2022-23.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************ SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *************************

INVOICE
Thank
you
for
your
business!
Ship
Date
Ticket
Number
Plant
Prod
Num
Description
UOM
Quantity
Shipped
Unit
Price
Tax
Gross
Price
Invoice
Due:

Phone:
(800)469-8010
E-mail:
[email protected]
Page:
1 OF
1 Invoice
No:

Invoice
Date:

Bill
to:

Ship
to:

Customer
P.O.

Cust
Order
#
Project/Order
#
Shipped
Via
Terms
Due
Date
We
impose
a
surcharge
of

2.25%
on
the
transaction
amount
on
all
credit
card
products,
which
is
not
greater
than
our
cost
of
processing.

We
do
not
surcharge
on
debit
cards.

Invoice
Amt:

Please
include
invoice
number
on
checks
&
copy
of
invoices
with
adjustments

ORIGINAL
SUBTOTAL:

Tax
:

Total
:

State
&
Local
Taxes
Customer

#
Ship

Sold

$40,000.00

$40,000.00
0 9/27/2022
N

1 0.000
%

Bill

09272022

09/27/2022
10/27/2022
10/27/2022
Net due 30 days
50%
Due for Guard Rail
Installation
$40,000.00
CITY

OF JURUPA

CITY OF JURUPA

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.E
ACC

EPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION AT THE HALL

AVENUE AND AGUA MANSA ROAD INTERSECTION ( AGUA

MANSA COMMERCE PREDEV, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY)
RECO

MMENDATION
I
t is recommended that the City Council:

1. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes including public utility and public services purposes over the area as shown on Exhibit B of DED22-003.

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication of DED22-003.

BACKGROUND
A
gua Mansa Commerce Predev, LLC, is the owner of the highlighted area as shown on Exhibit B of DED22-003.

The ar
ea located east of the Rubidoux Boulevard and El Rivino Road intersection, and south of the El Rivino Road centerline.

A
s part of the Agua Mansa Commercial Park development approval, the owner is required to improve the City parkway area in front of their property along El Rivino Rd. and other roads surroundings the site. The owner has entered into an agreement for the maintenance of the landscape and irrigation improvements.

The appl
icant submitted the required offer of dedication documents; staff reviewed the documents, and find them in compliance with the California Government Code ( 7050), local ordinances, and the conditions of approval for this development.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS

In anticipation of acceptance of the offers of dedications, staff prepared a certificate of acceptance as required by Government Code Section 27281. Acceptance of the offers of dedication will grant the City an easement for public road and drainage purposes and allow improvements along El Rivino Road.

FISCAL IMPACT

There is no impact to the general fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Take no action.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

************************ SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE *************************

Page | 4

ATTACHMENT 1
Offer of Dedication DED22-003 and Certificate of Acceptance.

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Attn: City Clerk

Exempt: Government Code Section 6103

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
APNs: 175-210-032,034,062 & 063

PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Government Code Section 27281)
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property granted by the easement deed dated the 1st day of August, 2022 from the Grantor, AGUA MANSA COMMERCE PREDEV, LLC , A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY , to the Grantee, C ITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted for the purpose of vesting title in the City of Jurupa Valley on behalf of the public for public road and drainage purposes, including public utility and public services purposes, and said street shall not become part of the City maintained street system until accepted by resolution of this council adopted pursuant to the authority granted to the undersigned as provided in Streets and Highways Code Section 1806 and Sections 1 and 2 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 669.1, as said ordinance was adopted by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Jurupa Valley Ordinance No. 2011-10 adding Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, adopting by reference the ordinances of the County of Riverside as of July 1, 2011, the date of incorporation of the City of Jurupa Valley, as well as the resolutions, rules and regulations of the County of Riverside implementing these ordinances. Grantee consents to the recordation of said easement by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: _____________________, 2022

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

ATTEST:

Paul Toor, PE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.F
C
ZA22005 - INITIATE A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT PERTAINING

TO THE PROCESSING AND TERMS OF EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT)

APPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

APPROVALS
RECO

MMENDATION
By motion, initiate a zoning text amendment pertaining to the processing and terms of extension of time (EOT) applications for Community Development Department approvals.

BACKGROUND
The Jurupa Valley Municipal Code governs how the Community Development Department approves permit and entitlement extensions. The proposed zoning text amendment will introduce new text or amend existing text to specify the extension of time process. The amendment improves the clarity and efficiency of the application process.

SUMMARY
Community Development Department approvals include provisions when work on a project needs to start and finish. If a project cannot start or finish within these periods, the applicant may file a request to extend the approval term. When granted, an EOT provides additional time to complete the project; otherwise, it may be considered expired or null and void.

The proposed amendment will modify provisions pertaining to the initial approval period, the approving body, the number of possible extensions, and the maximum extension time.

Additionally, the amendment will provide specific language identifying how the Community Development Department issues extensions, when they are available, and the terms of the extension.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANTICIPATED RELEVANT ZONING CODE SECTIONS
Table No. 1 identifies some or all of the chapters and sections that are anticipated to be amended. After a complete review and analysis, a recommended code amendment will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration.

TABLE 1 – ANTICIPATED JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS BEING AMENDED

SECTION TITLE INITIAL APPROVAL
PERIOD
Sec. 9.240.330. Site Development Permits 2 Years
Sec. 9.240.280. Conditional Use Permits 1 Year
Sec. 9.240.310 Public Use Permits 1 Year
Sec. 9.240.360. Setback Adjustments And Temporary Use Of Land COA* Sec. 9.240.270. Variances 1 Year
Chap. 9.290 Interim Use Permit 3 Years
Sec. 7.15.230. Expiration of Approved Tentative Maps And Vesting Tentative Maps—Extension of Time.
3 Years**
*Initial approval for Setback Adjustments and Temporary Use of Land are set by conditions of approval. **The initial approval for Tentative Maps are 3 years, vesting maps have an initial approval period of 1 year.

INITIATION
The following considerations apply to the initiation process, which only enables the code amendment process to begin:

1. Initiation of a code amendment does not entail an evaluation of the merits of the proposed project, but only whether or not to proceed with a formal evaluation process and public hearings.

2. The Council may express its opinions as to whether the City should proceed with the formal evaluation process, but should reserve its views regarding the merits of the ultimate action on the amendment until the ev aluation process and public hearing have been completed.

3. Once the formal evaluation process and public hearings are completed, the City Council will have the opportunity to approve or disapprove or make changes to the recommended Code Amendment.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The expenses related to the proposed code amendment would be paid from the General Fund.

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
22051: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 FOR 118 CONDOMINIUMS ON APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED

AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND
BEACH STREET; (APN: 162 -230-012); APPROVING A PREVIOUS

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FINDING THAT NO FURTHER

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APPLICANT:

CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC)

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive public testimony, and adopt Resolution No. 2022-107, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO PERMIT T HE CONSTRUCTION OF 118 CONDOMINIUMS
ON APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT THE

SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH

STREET AND APPROVING A PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL

DETERMINATION FINDING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL

REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALI FORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APN: 162-230-012)

BACKGROUND
In April, 2016, the City of Jurupa Valley City Council adopted Resolution No. 2016 -15 certifying an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Statement of Overriding

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

Conditions, adopting Specific Plan (SP) No. 1402 (Paradise Knolls SP), and approving General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 1406, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 36822 to allow the construction of a master planned community consisting of 650 dwelling units, along with commercial, recreational, and open space uses on approximately 107 acres on Limonite Avenue, west of Downey Street, a nd north of the Santa Ana River. The City Council also approved a Development Agreement that vested Developer’s rights to build the Project in accordance with th e land use entitlements for the ten -year term of the Development Agreement.

The Paradise Knolls SP, and TTM subdivided the 107.2 acres into six (6) individual planning areas (low to high-density residential, commercial, and open space) spread out across nine (9) separate lots. Pursuant to the conditions of approval for the SP, each planning area is to be developed with its own Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP).

See Exhibit A for the Paradise Knolls SP Planning Areas.

On September 28, 2022, the Planning Commission approved Master Application (MA) No. 22051 for 118 condominiums at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street (Lot 7 within Planning Area 2 of the Paradise Knolls SP) by a vote of 3-0-

1. MA22051 was subsequently appealed to the City Council by Councilmember Brian Berkson on October 6, 2022 pursuant to the provisions of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.05.100. See Attachment 1 for the notice of appeal.

On November 9, 2022, the Planning Commission considered Master Application (MA) No. 22118 for 35 detached condominiums at the northeast corner of Rancho Jurupa Drive, and Beach Street (Lot 9 within Planning Area 2 of the Paradise Knolls SP).

EXHIBIT A – PARADISE KNOLLS SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREAS

Page | 3

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes to construct a residential community consisting of 118 condominium (condo) townhomes on 7.94 acres of vacant land at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street (Lot 7 within Planning Area 2 of Approved Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) (APN: 162-230-012)). Although Planning Area 2 includes both Lot 7 and Lot 9, the Applicant is processing the two (2) communities under separate applications, each with their own respective Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP).

This proposed townhome community would consist of 25 individual townhouse buildings including 10 fourplexes, 12 fiveplexes, and three (3) sixplexes for a total 118 units . The unit mix would consist of 28 two - (2) bedroom/bathroom, and 90 three - (3) bedroom/2.5 bathroom units, and the homes would range in size from 1,164 ft2 to 1,609 ft2. All buildings would be two (2) stories in height. Residents would own the interior of their individual townhouse unit, along with the airspace above, while the exterior of the townhouse buildings and common area would be owned and maintained by a H omeowner’s Association (HOA). The community would include improvements and amenities including a private outdoor swimming pool and spa area, parking in the form of two- (2) car garages for residents an d on street for visiting guests , screen walls, extensive landscaping for beautification and privacy screening, decorative street and pedestrian lighting , and decoratively paved entrances with monument signage. See Exhibit B for the conceptual site plan.

The proposed project would require the following entitlement and plan:

1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map: Subdivide existing 7.94-acre project site into 17 new lots for attached condominiums (townhomes), private streets, private courts, and private open space; and

2. Neighborhood Development Plan: Develop project to be consistent with all of the goals, objectives, guidelines, and development standards set forth in the Paradise Knolls SP.

EXHIBIT B – CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

Page | 4

PROJECT LOCATION AND SURROUNDING AREA
The project site is located within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street in the southern area of the City. In the general neighborhood, there are residential, commercial, and institutional uses. The immediate surrounding land uses include vacant land to the north, east, and south, and the California-Nevada Electrical Joint Apprenticeship Training Center (JATC) to the west.

Nearby pending projects include Paradise Knolls Planning Area 2 – Lot 9 (proposed 35 single-family units on 2.62 acres), and Paradise Knolls Planning Area 5 (219 single-family units on 31.5 acres). Paradise Knolls Planning Area 1 - “Bridle Path at Paradise Knolls” is currently under construct ion (107 units on 16.35 acres). See Exhibit C for the site location and nearby surrounding projects.

TABLE 1: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
ACCESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 162-230-012
TOTAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE 7.94 acres
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Highest Density Residential (HHDR) – Up to 25 dwelling units per acre
ZONING CLASSIFICATION Specific Plan (Paradise Knolls Specific Plan)
EXHIBIT C – SITE LOCATION WITH SURROUNDING PROJECTS

Page | 5

PROJECT DESIGN AND SITE LAYOUT
Architecture, Amenities, and Landscaping
The prop osed project would provide for high quality townhome architecture, private amenities, and extensive landscaping that would provide beautification and privacy screening. The project would incorporate a mix of modern American farmhouse, and Craftsman style architecture that adhere to and reinforce the community theme of “River Ranch Trails .” See Exhibit D for architectural elevations of fourplexes. The proposed architecture would be consistent with the residential design guidelines set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) as it would incorporate: (1) authentic colors to the proposed architectural styles, (2) a mix of materials in transition (board and batten siding, horizontal siding, and stucco), (3) recessed doors and windows, (4) gabled roofs, and (5) articulated facades. All buildings would be two (2) stories in height at approximately 30 feet tall.

EXHIBIT D – PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE

The proposed project would include amenities such as an approximately 5,700ft2 outdoor swimming pool and spa area, a total 65 private parking spaces for visiting guests in street and off-street spaces, and pedestrian-oriented street neighborhood lighting that would honor the community theme of “River Ranch Trails.” Visitor parking would be permit only, and enforced through the homeowner’s association (HOA). Five (5) of the visitor -only parking spaces would also be equipped with electrical vehicle (EV) charging stations. See Exhibits E and F for proposed amenities. The outdoor swimming pool and spa area would include a full-sized pool and spa, large shade structure, lounge seat ing, barbeque area, and a building for storing pool equipment and restrooms.

Page | 6

EXHIBIT E – PROPOSED POOL AND SPA AREA

EXHIBIT F – PROPOSED LIGHTING

The project site would include dense , drought-tolerant landscaping that would both beautify the community, and provide substantial screening from the adjacent streets, and the California -Nevada Electrical Joint Apprenticeship Training Center (JATC) located directly to the west. The western portion of the community would include an 11 -foot plantable retaining wall, followed by a landscaped setba ck area with screening trees, shrubs, and a 6 -foot high wall decorative block wall (from top of grade). The northern portion of the community would include a 6-foot high decorative block wall along Limonite Avenue, followed by a sloped planting area, and r etaining wall with a decorative cable fence on top. The eastern portion of the community along Beach Street is not required to be screened by a wall per the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) , however, this project would provide a four- (4) foot decorative wall for increased privacy and pedestrian safety.

The southern edge of the community would also include a max 7.5-foot plantable retaining

Page | 7

wall, followed by a double row of trees and shrubs to provide beautification and screening.

As the southern part of the community would be raised above Rancho Jurupa Drive, and there would be a sloped planting area, there would be decorative cable fence along the southern edge of the community for pedestrian safety, and to allow for picturesque views of the future linear park, the Santa Ana River, and Santiago Peak.

Off-Site Improvements, Access, Maintenance
The project site would primarily be accessed from the future signalized intersection of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street, with direct entrances/exits being on Beach Street, and Rancho Jurupa Drive. The Beach Street entrance/exit would be restricted to right in/out, and the Rancho Jurupa Drive entrance/exit would have full right -of-way (ROW) access. The project site would have a main circulating street and the townhomes and garages would be accessed through private courts. The development would include a total of 65 visitor-only parking spaces which includes street parking and off-street parking spaces. As there is no visitor-only parking requirement in the Paradi se Knolls Specific Plan (SP), the proposed number of visitor-only parking spaces far exceeds the minimum requirement.

The community would be served by several off -site improvements. Limonite Avenue is currently being improved with new medians, and a new 12-foot wide multi-purpose trail along the south side of Limonite Avenue, directly north of the project site.

Beach Street is already constructed to a ROW width of 98 feet with two travel (2) lanes each way, a landscaped median, and 10-foot wide parkways on both sides for street trees and sidewalks.

This project would require the construction of Rancho Jurupa Drive to a full ROW width of 56 feet, with 36 feet of roadway, and 10-foot wide parkways on both sides for street trees and sidewalks. The intersection of Beach Street and Rancho Jurupa Drive would also be improv ed with a mini roundabout for improved traffic circulation, and increased pedestrian and vehicular safety.

All common area, including internal streets, courts, walkways, amenities, and landscaping within the community , would be privately owned and maintained by the HOA . All streetlights would be owned, operated, and maintained by Southern California Edison (SCE). Limonite Avenue, Beach Street, and Rancho Jurupa Drive would be publicly owned and maintained through a community facilities district (CFD).

Reduced Density and Housing Element (Regional Housing Needs Assessment) Implications
The Applicant is proposing to develop Planning Are a (PA) 2 (Lot 7 and Lot 9) at a lower density than anticipated per the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) at 14.9 dwelling units per acre (Lo t 7 – this project), and 13.4 dwelling units per acre (Lot 9 – pending application). PA 2 of the SP is designated as Highest Density Residential (HHDR – 25 dwelling units per acre) in the City’s General Plan, and has a target density of 20 -25 dwelling uni ts per acre within the SP. This density typically allows for mid -rise developments in the range of 4-5 stories in height.

Page | 8

As part of the Housing Element certification process, the City was required to tabulate anticipated densities from incoming projects, and select vacant sites to be re-designated to achieve the densities needed to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goal of 4,485 units to be built over the next eight (8) years. PA 2 of the SP was included in the tabulation at an expected 300 units (up to 25 dwelling units per acre). As a result of the decreased density proposed by Applicant for both Lots 7 and 9, the City would have a deficit of 50 units for the “Low” Income category in the RHNA. The City would have to re -designate approximately two (2) acres of vacant, undeveloped land at HHDR – 25 dwelling units per acre for its Housing Element to remain in compliance with State Law within six (6) months of this project’s potential approval. The City is in the process of identifyin g potential sites for re -designation in the event that this project is approved by the City Council.

ANALYSIS
I. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. The City of Jurupa Valley has prepared and adopted an Environmental Impact Report for the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP). California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines §15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations, allows a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be used as the environmental assessment for a project requiring further discretionary approval if it is determined that the Project currently under review does not propose substantial changes to the previously adopted or certified CEQA documentation. As the proposed project is entirely within the scope of the approved SP, and adopted and certified EIR, a Previous Environmental D etermination (PED) (included in Attachment 2 – Planning Commission Resolution ) has been made and prepared for the project.

I. GENERAL PLAN. The project is consistent with the General Plan.

A. Housing Element N o Net Loss. The Applicant is proposing to develop Planning Area (PA) 2 – Lot 7 at a lower density than anticipated per the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP) at 14.9 dwelling units per acre. PA 2 of the SP is designated as Highest Density Residential (HHDR – up to 25 dwelling units per acre) in the City’s General Plan, and has a target density of 20-25 dwelling units per acre within the SP. This density typically allows for mid-rise developments in the range of 4-5 stories in height.

As part of the Housing Element certification process, the City was required to tabulate anticipated densities from incoming projects, and select vacant sites to be re -designated to achieve the densities needed to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goal of 4,485 units to be built over the next eight (8) years. PA 2 of the SP was included in the tabulation at an expected 300 units ( up to 25 dwelling units per acre). As a result of the decreased density, the City would have a deficit of 50 units for the “Low” Income c ategory in the RHNA. The City would have to re -designate approximately two (2) acres of vacant, undeveloped land at HHDR – 25 dwelling units per acre for its Housing Element to remain in compliance with

Page | 9

State Law within six (6) months of this project’s potential approval. The City is in the process of identifying potential sites for re-designation.

B. Land Use Designation.

The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Highest Density Residential (HHDR) that allows up to 25 dwelling units per acre. The project demonstrates consistency with the residential section of the Land Use Element, in the General Plan including the following policies:
 LUE 2.1 Residential Development. Accommodate the development of single-family and multi -family residential units in areas appropriately designated by the General Plan, specific plans, the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay, and community and town center plans land use maps.

The proposed project is for a residentia l development on land that has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Highest Density Residential (HHDR).
 LUE 2.2 Higher Density Residential. Accommodate higher density residential development in walkable, pedestrian oriented areas near major transportatio n corridors, concentrated employment areas, and community and town centers, and promote the development of high quality apartments and condominiums that will encourage local investment and pride of ownership.

The proposed project is for a high quality mult i-family community along a primary transportation corridor in Limonite Avenue. The community would also be walkable, ownership based, and is proposed at a density consistent with the Highest Density Residential (HHDR) land use designation (up to 25 dwelling units per acre) in the City’s General Plan.  LUE 2.3 Infrastructure. Ensure that circulation facilities, water resources, sewer and storm drainage facilities, and other utilities available or provided by the developer are adequate to meet th e demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses.

All street and trail improvements, drainage infrastructure, and other utilities are found to be adequate to meet t he demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents and businesses, and consistent with the requirements set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP).  LUE 2.6 Buffering. Require setbacks and other design elements to buffer residential units from the impacts of abutting agricultural, roadway, commercial, and industrial uses, to the maximum extent possible.

Page | 10

The development meets the required setbacks set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP), and incorporates design features such as screen walls and dense landscaping to buffer residential units from any potential impacts of abutting uses.
 LUE 2.9 Design Compatibility. Ensure that new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures.

The proposed project successfully incorporates modern American farmhouse, and Craftsman architectural styles that are compatible with the surrounding area, and are two (2) of the permitted architectural styles pursuant to the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP).  LUE 10.9 Promote Unique Community Character. Use community plans to promote the development and preservation of unique communities in which each community exhibits a special sense of place and quality of design.

The proposed project reinforces the community theme of “River Ranch Trails” through its inclusion of high quality Farmhouse and Craftsman architecture, decorative street lighting and landscaping, and views of the Santa Ana River and surrounding communities.
 LUE 11.8 Signage. Require development projects to use high quality, well-designed signage that is architecturally integrated with and complementary to the proposed building(s) and adjacent development.

The proposed project would include high quality monument signs at both entrances into the community. The signs would have a decorative stack stone gabion base, and a backlit sign face readin g the name of the community, pursuant to the requirements of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP).
 LUE 13.1 Fair Share Infrastructure Funding. Require that new development contribute its fair share to fund infrastructure and public facilities, such as po lice and fire facilities, parks, streets, and trail improvements.

The applicant would be required to contribute over $470,000 in Development Impact Fees (DIFs) which would be allocated to fund fire services, roads, parks, schools, libraries, and other public facilities, as well as an Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fee of $2.50/ft2 (per the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance) that the City would use towards the provision affordable housing.

II. TITLE 7 – SUBDIVISIONS. Vesting Tentative Tract Map ( VTTM) No. 38257 complies with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act for the proposed 17 parcels. The Engineering Department has reviewed the Project for required travel lanes, access, circulation, grading, and drainage. The

Page | 11

recommended conditions address areas such as subdivision, circulation, access, grading, drainage, and water quality.

III. TITLE 9 – ZONING ORDINANCE.

A. Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP). The project site has a zoning classification of Specific Plan (SP) (Paradise Knolls SP). The proposed project meets the intent, permitted uses, and development standards of the Paradise Knolls SP. The project would be providing for a high -density residential community that generate a sense of place, and reinforce the theme of the community . Ad ditionally, t he project complies with all applicable Multi-Family Attached (Townhomes) development standards of the Paradise Knolls SP (Table 2).

TABLE 2: MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED (TOWNHOMES)

APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD

REQUIRED

MINIMUM

PROJECT COMPLIANCE
Setbacks
Minimum Front Yard –
to main structure

10’ from walkway
All structures would have a
minimum front yard setback
of 10’ from the walkway.

Minimum Corner Side
Yard 10’
All structures would have a
minimum corner side yard
setback of 10’ from the street
and property line.

Minimum Rear Yard 20’ between
structures
All structures would have
minimum rear yard setback
of 28’ between structures.

Garage Setbacks 2’ max No garage would be setback
more than 2’ from the court.

Other
Height Requirements 48’ max
No structure is proposed to
be taller than 31’ tall at its
highest point.

Private Open Space 100 ft2
Each home would include a
minimum of 100ft2 of private
open space in front porches.

Page | 12

Off Street Parking
Requirements
2 Spaces/Dwelling
Each home would include a
two- (2) car garage.

B. Inclusionary Housing Requirement (Chapter 9.267). The Applicant submitted the proposed project under Senate Bill (SB) 330 (“Housing Crisis Act of 2019”) which allows for an applicant to freeze the applicable fees and development standards that apply to a p roject at the time of submittal.

Master Application (MA) No. 22051 was submitted on March 9, 2022. As the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was not adopted until August 2022, the project is not subject to the City’s Inclusionary Housing requirements. The Applicant, however, is volunteering to comply with the requirement in the form of an in-lieu payment. The project’s compliance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance is included as a recommended condition of approval.

IV. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION MAP Per Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, “A tentative map shall be denied if it does not meet all requirements of this ordinance, or if any of the following findings are made:”
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for th e type of development;
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development;
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems;
7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternative easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; and
8) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to

Page | 13

the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21 000 et seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act for standards and process.

Furthermore, the City’s Engineering Department has reviewed the project for access, circulation, grading, and drainage and has recommended conditions that would require the projec t to comply with mandated regulations.

The land is suitable for the proposed residential subdivision. The project will not cause any substantial environmental damage or impacts to wildlife and their habitats with recommended conditions and mitigation measu res. The project will not be a danger to the welfare of the general public. The project will not cause se rious public health problems. An Environmental Impact Report has been certified and adopted, and findings have been made pursuant to California Environ mental Quality Act. None of the findings for the denial of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map has been made. It is recommended for approval.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 1,000 feet from the boundaries of the project site. Additionally, a legal advertisement was published in the Press Enterprise on Monday, November 7, 2022. No comment has been received at the time of this report.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The time to process this appeal will be covered by the general fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022 -107 to approve MA22051 (VTTM38257), subject to the recommended conditions of approval.

2. Deny MA22051 (VTTM38257); (No action, maintaining the status quo)

3. Continue the public hearing and provide direction to staff.

CONCLUSION
The community would serve as a featured entrance to the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (SP), and honor the SP theme of “River Ranch T rails” by incorporating high quality farmhouse, and craftsman architecture, decorative features including, paving, lighting, and landscaping, and scenic views of the Santa Ana River and nearby mountains. The community would be well equipped with amenities such as the shaded private swimming pool, and spa area, and large amount of visitor-only parking spaces, benefitting the quality of life of residents and their visiting guests . The community would provide for a housing

ATTACHMENT 1:

NOTICE OF APPEAL

ATTACHMENT 2:

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-107

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-107

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP (VTTM) NO. 38257 AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TO PERMIT T HE CONSTRUCTION OF 118 CONDOMINIUMS ON
APPROXIMATELY 7.94 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST

CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND BEACH STREET AND

APPROVING A PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

FINDING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS

REQUIRED UNDER THE CALI FORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT (APN: 162-230-012)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. Century Communities of California, LLC (the “Applicant”) has applied for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 and a Neighborhood Development Plan (collectively, Master Application No. 22051 or MA No. 22051) to allow the subdivision of approximately 7.94 acres into 17 lots for attached condominiums (townhomes), private streets, private courts, and open space on real property located at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street (APN: 162-230-012) in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan Zone and designated Highest Density Residential (HHDR) (the “Project”).

Section 2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38257, a Schedule “A” subdivision of approximately 7.94 acres into 17 lots for attached condominiums (townhomes), private streets, private courts, and open space on real property located at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street (APN: 162-230-012). (b) Section 7.15.090.B of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that whenever a vesting tentative map i s filed, it shall be processed in the same manner as a tentati ve map unless modified by S ection 7.15.090, and shall have printed consp icuously on its face the words “Vesting Tentative Map.”
(c) Section 7.05.020.A of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides t hat the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designated as the “Advisory Agency” charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed vesting tentative Schedule “A” maps. Further, Section 7.05.020.A of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
(d) Consistent with Section 7.15.130.A of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code , the Planning Commission held a duly notice public hearing on the map. At the conclusion of the -2-

public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022 -09-28-01 approving the Project.
(e) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires denial of a vesting tentative tract map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. 7) That the design of th e proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a vesting tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resou rces Code Section 21000 et seq.), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Section 3. Neighborhood Development Plan.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of a Neighborhood Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” which Plan would ensure that future development within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan will be consistent with all of the goals, objectives, guidelines, development standards, requirements, and provisions set forth in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan. -3-

(b) Section 9.235.030.B of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that any use permitted within a specific plan shall be subject to the permit requireme nts specified in the plan.
(c) Section III of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan provides that the Planning Commission will review and approve, deny, or modify a Neighborhood Development Plan. The City Council has the authority to call up any item that was considered by the Planning Commission for consideration by the City Council. The Project was subsequently requested to be reviewed by the Council for re-consideration
Section 4. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 22051 was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On September 28, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 22051, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission regarding the Project.

Following the receipt of public testimony the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2022-09-28-01 approving MA No. 22051. (c) Pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.05.100.B “An appeal may be filed by an individual Council Mem ber or by the City Council, provided, however, that any such appeal shall be solely on the basis that the issues related to the application are important to the city and should be decided by the entire City Council, and, provided further, that an appeal by an individual Council Member or the Council shall not mean, nor shall it be construed to mean, that the individual Council Member or the City Council is expressing a view in favor of or in opposition to the application. ” Council Member Berkson filed an a ppeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Master Application No. 22051 on October 6, 2022 pursuant to Section

9.05.100.B.
(d) On November 17, 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 22051, at which time all person interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council regarding the Project. (e) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 5. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The City Council hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
(a) Pursuant California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub. Res.

Code § 21000 et seq.) and Section 15162 of the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff has considered the potential environmental impacts of the Project.

City staff has also reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Paradise Knolls Project certified by the City Council on April 21, 2016, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and prepared a Previous Environmental Document Review -4-

Determination in accordance with CEQA for the Project. Based on that review, the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department has determined that the Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, an d that the Project does not involve new information of substantial importance which shows that the Project will have significant effects not discussed in the prior FEIR. All potential environmental impacts associated with the Paradise Knolls Project and t he Project are adequately addressed by the prior FEIR, and the mitigation measures contained in the prior FEIR will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. (b) The City Council has independently reviewed the Previous Environmental Document Review Determination, and based upon the whole record before it, the Previous Environmental Document Review Determination, and its independent review and judgment, finds that that the Project is not subject to further environmental review pursuant to th e Guidelines because:
1) The Project and the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken do not involve substantial changes which will result in new significant environmental effects, and that the Project does not involve new information of substant ial importance which shows that the Project will have significant effects not discussed in the prior FEIR; and 2) All potential environmental impacts associated with the Paradise Knolls Project and the Project are adequately addressed by the prior FEIR, and the mitigation measures contained in the prior FEIR will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant.
(c) The custodian of records for the prior FEIR, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council determination is based, is the Community Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public review in the Community Development Department located at 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.

Section 6. Findings for Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 should be granted because:
(a) The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 meets all requirements of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. (b) The proposed land division will be consistent with the City’s General Plan including policies for the Highest Density Residential (HHDR) land use designation, in that the proposed land division will facilitate the future construction of one hundred eighteen (118) condominium townhomes at a density of 14.9 dwelling units per acre , which is below the maximum allowable density in the HHDR land use designation. (c) The design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with the City’s General Plan in that the design of the subdivision facilitates the development of a residential condominium townhome project, which is an allowed form of development within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan.
-5-

(d) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development in that as it is a relatively flat, undevelo ped, vacant lot in close proximity to other existing and planned residential land uses located to the north of Limonite Avenue, east of Beach Street, and south of Rancho Jurupa Drive. The Project site is physically suitable to accommodate the subdivision and future development of one-hundred eighteen (118) attached condominiums as there is adequate water and sewer connections, and other public services are available to the Project site.
(e) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development in that it proposes one hu ndred eighteen (118) condominium townhomes at a density of 14.9 dwelling units per acre, which is below the maximum allowable density under the General Plan Land Use designation of Highest Density Residential (HHDR – 25 dwelling units per acre).
(f) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat with the implementation of the recommended Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures.
(g) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan. The EIR determined that although development relate to the Specific Plan could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have b een required or revisions in the Project have been made or agreed to by the Applicant.
(h) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division in that the development would be in conflict with.

Section 7. Findings for Approval of Neighborhood Development Plan . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find and determine that the Neighborhood Development Plan should be approved because it is consistent with the provisions of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan.

Section 8. Findings for Approval of Master Application No. 22051 with Conditions.
(a) Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Master Application No. 22051 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 and the Neighborhood Development Plan) to allow the subdivision of approximately 7.94 acres into 17 lots for attached condominiums (townhomes) , private streets, private courts, and open space on real property located at the southwest corner of Limoni te Avenue and Beach Street (APN : 162- 230-012), all subject to the conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. (b) As part of the Housing Element certification process, the City was required to tabulate anticipated densities from incoming projects, and select vacant sites to be re-designated to achieve the densities needed to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goal of -6-

4,485 units to be built over the next eight years. The Project site was included in the tabulation at an expected 300 units (up to 25 dwelling units per acre). As a result of the decreased density proposed by Applicant, the City will have a deficit of 50 units for the “Low Income” category in the RHNA. In accordance with Section 65863 of the California Government Code, the City shall re-designate 2 acres of vacant, undeveloped land at HHDR – 25 dwelling units p er acre for its Housing Element within 180 days of this approval.

Section 9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 17th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-7-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-107 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 17th day of November, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 17th day of November, 2022.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Exhibit “A”
Neighborhood Development Plan

PARADISE KNOLLS
Specific Plan No. 1402

Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP)
Multi-Family Neighborhood – Planning Area 2, Lot 7
TTM 38257

Prepared for:

City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
951-332-6464

Developed by:

Century Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660
949-570-2553

Prepared by:

Matthew Fagan Consulting Services, Inc.
42011 Avenida Vista Ladera
Temecula, CA 92591
951-265-5428

September 2022

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-i

Table of Contents

1. Project Description 1
a. Overview 1
b. NDP Contents 1
c. Neighborhood Common Characteristics 7
d. Multi-Family Neighborhood (PA2) 7
e. Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 (TTM 38257) and Specific Plan Consistency 7

2. Development Standards/Product Type 8

3. Proposed Architectural Styles for TTM 38257 10
a. Modern Farmhouse 10
b. Craftsman 11

4. Landscaping and Streetscapes/Edge Conditions 13 a. Limonite Avenue West of Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition 14 b. Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition 15 c. Rancho Jurupa Drive (formerly "A" Street) East and West of PA5 Concourse Streetscape and Edge Condition 15
d. Local Streets – Streetscape 16
e. Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) and Rural Neighborhood PA4 (LDR)- Training Facility Edge Condition 16
f. TTM 38257 Landscape Plan with Street Trees 17
g. Proposed TTM 38257 Neighborhood Entry Monumentation 18 h. Proposed TTM 38257 Community Walls and Fences 20
i. Proposed TTM 38257 Lighting Options 21

Figures

Figure 1, Vicinity Map 3
Figure 2, Specific Plan Area Map 4
Figure 3, Lot Configuration (TTM 38257) 5
Figure 4, Trail/Sidewalk Plan 6
Figure 5, Multi-Family Attached Townhomes 9

Tables

Table 1, Lot Statistics 2
Table 2, Housing Types 2
Table 3, Tabulation of Dwelling Units 3
Table 4, Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes 8

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-1

1. Project Description

a. Overview

The purpose of the Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP) is to ensure that future development within the Specific Plan will be consistent with all the goals, objectives, guidelines, and development standards requirements provisions outlined in Specific Plan No. 1402. The Neighborhood Development Plan shall be approved by the Planning Commission either before, or concurrent with, approval of either a Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Permit, Conditional Use Permit, or some combination thereof. This NDP shall serve to accompany the curr ent project, Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 (TTM 38257). TTM 38257 will be approved only if found to be in conformance with the standards and guidelines outlined in the Specific Plan No. 1402. The Neighborhood Development Plan will be utilized to establish the street pattern, infrastructure, and design characteristics.

b. NDP Contents

This NDP contains the following information:

• Area map with project site identified. See Figure 1, Vicinity Map, and Figure 2, Specific Plan Area Map.
• Proposed lot configuration. See Figure 3, Lot Configuration (TTM 38257). • Lot Statistics (See Table 1, Lot Statistics).
• Proposed trails and/or sidewalks. See Figure 4, Trail/Sidewalk Plan. • Required park locations, types, and acreages. See Figure 3, Lot Configuration (TTM 38257) and also description under item e in this Section.
• Summary table of housing types and numbers (See Table 2, Housing Types). The Architectural Styles are contained in Sections 3 and 4 of this NDP.
• Tabulation of dwelling units per acre (See Table 3, Tabulation of Dwelling Units). • Summary table of development standards. Development Standards and Product Types are contained in Section 2 of this NDP. (See Figure 5, Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes and Table 4, Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-2

Table 1
Lot Statistics

LOT STATISTICS

LOT LETTER AREA (SQUARE FEET) AREA (ACRES) DESCRIPTION
A 6,450 0.15 PRIVATE STREET
B 58,478 1.34 PRIVATE STREET
C 5,892 0.14 PRIVATE STREET
D 2,825 0.07 PRIVATE ALLEY
E 7,315 0.17 PRIVATE ALLEY
F 2,281 0.05 PRIVATE ALLEY
G 6,688 0.15 PRIVATE ALLEY
H 2,825 0.07 PRIVATE ALLEY
I 2,777 0.06 PRIVATE ALLEY
J 6,593 0.15 PRIVATE ALLEY
K 2,981 0.07 PRIVATE ALLEY
L 6,707 0.15 PRIVATE ALLEY
M 2,281 0.05 PRIVATE ALLEY
N 3,225 0.07 PRIVATE ALLEY
TOTAL 117,318 2.69

LOT NUMBER AREA (SQUARE FEET) AREA (ACRES) DESCRIPTION
1 150,349 3.45 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUMS
2 37,637 0.87 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUMS/OPEN SPACE
3 39,207 0.90 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUMS/OPEN SPACE
TOTAL 224,744 5.22

Table 2
Housing Types

Housing Types Size Number of Units
Modern Farmhouse
Plan 1 – 2 bedroom/2 bath 1,164 Square Feet (SF) 16
Plan 2 – 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,386 SF 16
Plan 3 – 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,496 SF 16
Plan 4 – 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,609 SF 17
Total Number of Units -- 65
Craftsman
Plan 1 – 2 bedroom/2 bath 1,164 SF 12
Plan 2 – 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,386 SF 12
Plan 3 – 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,496 SF 12
Plan 4 – 3 bedroom/2.5 bath 1,609 SF 17
Total Number of Units -- 53
Overall Total -- 118

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-3

Table 3
Tabulation of Dwelling Units

Land Use Gross Acres Number of
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
per Acre
Highest Density Residential
(PA2 – Lot 7) 7.9 118 15
Figure 1
Vicinity Map

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-4

Figure 2
Specific Plan Area Map

SITE

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-5

Figure 3
Lot Configuration (TTM 38257)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-6

Figure 4
Trail/Sidewalk Plan

Note: A multi -use path (Class I) along Limonite Avenue is required; to be installed by the PA1 Developer.

Note: An open space trail along the PA 5 Concourse is required; to be installed by the PA5 Developer.

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-7

c. Neighborhood Common Characteristics

Although the design and mix of residential types within the overall Specific Plan may vary by neighborhood and by location, PA2 is required to have the following characteristics:

• Attractive, green, walkable streets /paths that provide a safe environment f or pedestrians, bicyclists, and children.
• A private recreational area is required.
• Comfortable walking and biking access to a neigh borhood commercial center with basic commercial amenities such as shops, markets, and restaurants.

d. Multi-Family Neighborhood (PA2)

The following information was taken from Specific Plan No. 1402 as it applies to Multi-Family Neighborhood (PA2)

• PA2, in its entirety, provides for the development of 10.4 acres with a target of 300 dwelling units and a target of 20+ dwelling units per acre.
• PA2 is located at the main Project entry (at the intersection of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street).

Approximately 2.6 acres are located southerly of PA3. The remaining acres are located southerly of Limonite Avenue, westerly of the main Projec t access, and easterly of the California/Nevada Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee (JATC) facility. • Attractive, walkable streets shall provide a safe path for pedestrians and bicyclists to amenities, adjoining neighborhoods, and/or the neighborhood commercial center (PA3). • Provide some orientation to the street and will provide linkages to the private and public open space/recreation, pedestrian networks, and commercial uses. • Private recreation facilities will be provided, for the sole use of its residents.

e. Tentative Tract Map No. 38257 (TTM 38257) and Specific Plan Consistency

The following highlights TTM 38257 consistency with Specific Plan No. 1402 and this NDP:

• TTM 38257 provides for the development of approximately 7.9 acres with 118 dwelling units and a density of approximately 15 dwelling units per acre.
• TTM 38257 is located southerly of Limonite Avenue, westerly of the main Project access, and easterly of the California/Nevada Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee (JATC) facility. • Vehicular access to TTM 38257 shall be provided from Beach Street and Rancho Jurupa Drive. • Attractive, walkable streets provide a safe path for pedestrians and bicyclists to private and public amenities, adjoining neighborhoods, and/or the neighborhood commercial center (PA3). • Primary pedestrian access to and from TTM 38257 is provided by sidewalks along Beach Street and Rancho Jurupa Drive, as well as from sidewalks internal to the Planning Area. • TTM 38257 residents have convenient access to the Recreational Conc ourse south of Rancho Jurupa Drive in PA5.
• Proposed architectural styles based on approved styles in Specific Plan. • Private recreation facilities provided: 0.13 acres with pool, spa, BBQ area, shade structure, restrooms, and lounge seating Figure 3, Lot Configuration (TTM 38257). • 64 guest parking stalls to be provided.

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-8

2. Development Standards/Product Type

The following Development Standards and Product Types are proposed for TTM 38257:

Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes

• Table 4, Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes
• Figure 5, Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes

Table 4
Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes

Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes
Development Standards
Lot Dimensions
Minimum Lot Width 30’
Setbacks
Minimum Front Yard – to main structure 10’ from walkway Minimum Corner Side Yard 10’ 1
Minimum Interior Side Yard 10’ from walkway
25’ between structures
Minimum Rear Yard 20’ between structures
Garage Setbacks 2’ max
Other
Maximum Structural Height 48’
Minimum Private Open Space 100 sq. ft.

Minimum 8’ dimension
Encroachments (fireplaces, AC units, media centers) 2’ 2 1 5’ public, 5’ private
2 At least one side must have 5’ clear

Note: average alley width 24’ and 30’ and average length 112’ varies per alley

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-9

Figure 5
Multi-Family Attached: Townhomes

Proposed Per TTM 38257

Recreation Area Enlargement (0.13 Acres)

1 Pool
2 Large Shade structure
3 Spa
4 Lounge Seating
5 BBQ Area
6 Restrooms/Pool Equipment

Recreation
Area

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-10

3. Proposed Architectural Styles for TTM 38257

a. Modern Farmhouse

4 Plex:

5 Plex:

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-11

6 Plex:

b. Craftsman

4 Plex:

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-12

5 Plex:

6 Plex:

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-13

4. Landscaping and Streetscapes/Edge Conditions

The following landscape components from Specific Plan No. 1402 shall apply to TTM 38257.

1 – Limonite Avenue West of Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition – SP Figure V-27

3 – Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition – SP Figure V-31

8 – “A” Street East and West of PA5 Concourse Streetscape and Edge Condition – SP Figure V-30

9 – Local Streets – Streetscape – SP Figure V-34

10 – Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) and Rural Neighborhood PA4 (LDR) – Training Facility Edge Condition – SP Figure V-40

Neighborhood Entry Monumentation – SP Figure V-22

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-14

a. Limonite Avenue West of Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition (TTM 38257 Landscape Plan Section H-H)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-15

b. Beach Street Entry Streetscape and Edge Condition (per TTM 38257)

c. Rancho Jurupa Drive (formerly "A" Street ) East and West of PA5 Concourse Streetscape and Edge Condition (TTM 38257 Landscape Plan Section D-D)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-16

d. Local Streets – Streetscape (per TTM 38257)

e. Multi-Family Neighborhood PA2 (HHDR) and Rural Neighborhood PA4 (LDR) – Training Facility Edge Condition (TTM 38257 Landscape Plan Section A-A)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-17
f. TTM 38257 Landscape Plan with Street Trees (created per SP Guidelines)

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-18

g. Proposed TTM 38257 Neighborhood Entry Monumentation

Key Map

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-19

Beach Street and Rancho Jurupa Drive:

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-20
h. Proposed TTM 38257 Community Walls and Fences (created per SP Guidelines) Legend

SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 1402 – NDP FOR TTM 38257 PAGE-21
i. Proposed TTM 38257 Lighting Options

Exhibit “B”
Previous Environmental Determination (PED)

Previous Environmental Determination
Paradise Knolls Specific Plan No. 1402

Master Application (MA) No. 22051
Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 38257

Lead Agency

City of Jurupa Valley
8390 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Kumail Raza, Senior Planner
(951) 332-6464 ext.252
[email protected]

Project Proponent:

Century Communities of California, LLC
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660

August 25, 2022

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

1.0 DETERMINATION
Based on the evaluation in Section 4.0 of this document, I find that all potentially s ignificant effects have been avoided or mitigated according to the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), State Clearinghouse (SCH) #20 14051049), City of Jurupa Valley Master Application (MA) No. 14115, certified on April 21 , 20 16. Ther efore, the Project is “within the scope” of the previously certified EIR. According to PRC §21166 and CEQA Guidelines §15162, CEQA does not require the preparation of any further environmental review.

City of Jurupa Valley
Signature Lead Agency
Joe Perez, Community Development Director August 25, 2022 Printed Name/Title Date

2.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (PED)
Once an environmental impact determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has been approved or certified for a project, no further action is required unless further discretionary approval for that project is required. CEQA Guidelines §15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations , allows a previously certified EIR or adopted Mitigated Negativ e Declaration (MND) to be used as the environmental assessment for a project requiring further discretionary approval if it is determined that the Project currently under review does not propose substantial changes to the previously adopted or certified CEQA documentation that would:
1) Create one or more new significant impacts.
2) Create impacts that are more severe.
3) Require major revisions to the CEQA document.

This PED has been prepared to determine if the request for is within the scope o f the analysis contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) SCH # 2014051049, City of Jurupa Valley Master Application (MA) No. 14115, certified on April 21, 2016, and to ensure that the by approving the request for Master Application (MA) No. 22051, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 38257, the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously. (See Table 1: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures)
MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

The previously certified FEIR is on file with the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, and is hereby incorporated by reference according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150.

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 38257 (“Project”) for 118 townhomes within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (PKSP) Planning Area 2 (PA2) Lot 7 on approximately 7.94 acres.

The proposed VTTM will have a residential density of approximately 14.86 du/ac.

The Project site is located on the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Beach Street, and is identified by the following Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 162-230-012.

4.0 ANALYSIS

Previously Identified Environmental Impacts

The FEIR determined that the previously approved PKSP would result in no impacts or less than significant environmental impacts under the following issue areas: Mineral Resources , Public Services and Facilities, and Recreation and Parks.

The FEIR determined that the previously approved PKSP would result in potentially significant impacts to Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources (archaeological), Geological Resources (paleontological), Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Utilities and Service Systems. With mitigation each issue area impacts were determined to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

The FEIR determined that the previously approved PKSP would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to Aesthetics, Air Quality, Land Use/Planning, Population and Housing, and Transportation and Traffic.

Current Environmental Impacts

When the PKSP was approved in 2016, the Project site was owned and operated by the Paradise Knolls Golf Course and included an 18-hole golf course, club house, maintenance buildings, and grounds keeper residence. Portions of the PKSP area are under construction.

The Project site (PA2) is in an area south of Limonite Avenue, north of Rancho Jurupa Road and the Santa Ana River with the California Nevada Electrical Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund facility to the west , Beach Street to the east, with vacant land and single-family residential MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

developments to the north and east. Because construction has not occurred on PA2, the physical conditions identified for PA2 in 2016 remain the same.

Applicability of the 2016 Certified FEIR

If the request for VTTM38257 is approved, the Project will incorporate the following as required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted with the PKSP FEIR:

 Plans, Policies, or Programs PPP)  These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project -based based on federal, state, or local law currently in place, which effectively reduce environmental impacts. The PPPs are listed in the MMRP attached to the FEIR.
 Mitigation Measures (MM)  These measures inc lude requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance with the provisions of CEQA. The MMs are summarized below in Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures
 Environmental
Topic/Threshold
Mitigation Measures (MM) Required to Reduce Impact Level of Significance
Aesthetics
Visual Character: The
proposed project will have a
significant impact on scenic
resources by removing the
existing golf course and
constructing a mixed-use
residential and commercial
development that will
substantially change views
and the character of the site.

MM- 4.1.6.1A: Visual Renderings: Prior to the issuance of any building permit for development under the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan, the developer shall provide a plot plan or site plan, landscaping plan, and visual rendering(s) that accurately illustrate the appe arance of the proposed development. The renderings shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the proposed project is consistent with the design guidelines of the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan, City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, and Municipal Code as applicable. The location and number of view presentations shall be at the discretion of the City Planning Department.

Significant
and
unavoidable.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

Light and Glare:

Development of the project
site would introduce
substantial new sources flight
and glare into the project area
from street lighting, parking
lots, and security light and
nighttime traffic, as well as
landscaping lighting.

MM- 4.1.6.2A: Light Management Plan: The project developer shall develop a “Lighting Management Plan” (LMP) for approval of the City to minimize light intrusion into neighborhoods to the east and north of the project site. A major restriction to be incorporated into the LMP will be to preclude or at least minimize any lights directed to the east, south or north anywhere on the site. Any lights oriented in those directions shall be elevated and directed down to the greatest extent feasible to minimize visual “hot spots” or glare during nighttime activities (e.g., the onsite commercial center). The LMP will include City contact numbers fo r local residents to contact City officials if lighting systems do not comply with the restrictions outlined in the LMP. Failure of users/uses to adhere to the requirements of the LMP will be cause for revocation of their use permit(s) and/or cancellation of their event.

MM - 4.1.6.2B: Landscape Buffer: As part of the project landscaping plan, the project developer shall provide massed plantings of trees of various types along the boundaries of the site to help reduce potential spillover of light and soften views onto the site from adjacent conservation areas.

Significant
and
unavoidable.

Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Conversion of Farmland to
Non-Agricultural Uses: The
NRCS defines some of the soils
onsite as prime soils if drained
and irrigated. The specific
plan also includes a Zone
Change (ZC) that would
convert the zoning from
Agriculture to Specific Plan
which would allow the
construction of residential and
commercial land uses.

MM - 4.2.6.1A: Community Farm : Prior to issuance of any discretionary permits for development within the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan property, the developer shall offer to dedicate a minimum of one acre of land within the Specific Plan to the City for “community farming” that will have full permanent public access and wa ter supply. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Division in consultation with the Riverside County Farm Bureau as appropriate.

Less than
significant.

Air Quality
Short-Term Construction
Related Emissions: Based on
the model outputs, NOX
emissions will be above the
regional threshold across all
three construction phases.

Application of SCAQMD Rules
402 and 403 will ensure than
fugitive dust impacts are less
than significant. Model
outputs show that the
emissions of the pollutants on
the peak day of construction
will result in concentrations of
pollutants at these nearest
residences MD thresholds of
significance.

MM - 4.3.6.1A: Daily Grading: The project shall require that the site preparation and grading contractors limit the daily disturbed area to 5 acres or less.

MM - 4.3.6.1B: Construction Equipment: The project shall require that the construction contractor use construction equipment that have Tier 4 final engines, level 3 diesel particulate filters (DPF), with oxidation catalyst that impart a 20% reduction.

Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022
Long-Term Project
Operational Emissions:

Modeling output show that
when all phases are complete,
the project would exceed
SCAQMD regional thresholds
for VOC and operational
emission rates would not
exceed the LST for receptors at
25 meters.

MM - 4.3.6.2A: Exceed 2013 Title 24 Residential Standards:

Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall demonstrate compliance with 2013 Title 24 Residential
Standards, which are at least 25 percent more efficient than Title 24 Part 6 energy efficiency standards, and that it meets Green Building Code Standards.

MM - 4.3.6.2B: Low Flow Fixtures: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall require all faucets, toilets, an d showers utilize low-flow fixtures such that indoor water demand is reduced by 20 percent.

MM - 4.3.6.2C: Water-Efficient Irrigation: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall require a water -efficient irrigation system be installed that reduces water demand by at least 6.1 percent.

MM - 4.3.6.2D: ENERGY STAR Appliances: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall require that ENERGY STAR appliances be installed in new homes.

MM - 4.3.6.2E: Recycling Program: Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, the developer shall demonstrate the project will implement a recycling program that reduces waste to landfills by a minimum of 50 percent and 75 percent by 2020.

MM - 4.3.6.2F: Energy-Efficient Lighting: Prior to issuance of building permits, project plans shall demonstrate that all lighting in proposed structures uses an average of 5 percent less energy than conventional lighting (see also MM 4.3.6.2B for guidelines).

MM - 4.3.6.2G: New Trees: Prior to issuance of building permits, project landscaping plans shall indicate that at least 2 trees per residential unit are planted for each phase of development (project total minimum 1,300 trees). These trees can be either relocated from the existing golf course or planted new.

Significant
and
unavoidable.

Air Quality Management
Plan Consistency: The
proposed uses would result in
more traffic than currently
allowed or planned uses (i.e.,
open space) generate. The
proposed land uses are not
consistent with the General
Plan land use designation and
so is not consistent with the
SCAG RCP Guidelines and the
SCAQMD AQMP.

There are no feasible mitigation measures. Significant
and
unavoidable
Cumulative Air Quality
Impacts: The project’s long-
term daily operational VOC
emissions would exceed the
SCAQMD’s thresholds;
therefore, the proposed
There are no feasible mitigation measures Significant
and
unavoidable
MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

project would contribute to
significant long-term
cumulative air quality
impacts.

Endangered and
Threatened Species: Because
of the proximity of the project
to the Santa Ana River and
potential habitat for
endangered and threatened
species, the project is subject
to Guidelines pertaining to the
Urban/Wildlands Interface for
the management of edge
effects as presented in Volume
1, Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP.

MM - 4.4.6.1C: Invasive & Non -native Plants: Prior to issuance of any building permits, landscaping plans shall demonstrate that invasive, non-native plant species shall not be used as landscaping materials on the site. Table 6-2 of Volume 1 of the MSHCP (Plants That Should Be Avoided Adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area) lists the plants that shall be avoided.

This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director.

MM - 4.4.6.1F: Fo cused Surveys: Prior to issuance of any occupancy permits, per MSHCP Section 6.1.2, Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools, if suitable habitat is present for least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and/o r western yellow -billed cuckoo and will be affected by the project, including any offsite equestrian facility, focused surveys shall be conducted according to currently accepted protocols. If any of these species is determined to be present, per MSHCP Sect ion 9 at least 90 percent of the occupied portions of the site that provide for the long-term conservation value for the identified species shall be conserved in a manner consistent with conservation of the species found to be present onsite. This would include 100 meters (300 feet) of undeveloped landscape adjacent to the conserved habitat. Although not stated in Section 9, if 90 percent cannot be conserved onsite, offsite mitigation that is biologically equivalent or superior would be required
MM - 4.4.6.1G: Consultation with US Army Corp of Engineers:

A Section 7 consultation will be required if a USACE permit is required to authorize impacts to USACE jurisdictional waters.

The project MSHCP Consistency Document incorrectly indicated that the project was not in designated USFWS critical habitat for federally listed species. However, PCR’s analysis indicated that critical habitat for LBV and Santa Ana sucker occurs within the Santa Ana River, portions of which briefly transect the southeast corner of the pr oject site but are completely avoided by the project. If the project requires issuance of a permit from a federal agency such as the USACE, a Section 7 Consultation pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) may be required. If the project can a void impacts to USACE waters and a USACE permit is therefore not required, FESA compliance, if necessary, would likely occur pursuant to the MSHCP (a USFWS Section 10a permit under FESA) in the event effects to LBV cannot be avoided. If the USACE determine s, through a
biological assessment or other review, that the issuance of a permit to is likely to adversely affect a listed species, the USACE will submit to the USFWS a request for formal consultation.

During formal consultation, the USFWS and USACE share
information about the proposed project and the species likely to Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

be affected. Formal consultation may last up to 90 days, after which the USFWS will prepare a biological opinion on whether the proposed activity will jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species which generally requires a minimum of an additional 45 days to issue.

Candidate, Non-listed
Sensitive, or Special-Status
Species: The proposed project
would affect sensitive species
through removal of vegetation
onsite as well as cause offsite
effects to riparian forest
habitat communities.

MM - 4.4.6.2A: Migratory Birds: Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the California Fish and Game Code (CFGC), site preparation activities (removal of trees and vegetation) shall be avoided during the nesting season of potentially occurring native and migratory bird species. The nesting season is January 15th through August 31st. Any construction activities that occur during the nesting season (February 15 to Aug ust 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors) in the trees and shrubs will require that all potential habitat be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist before commencement of clearing. If any active nests are detected, then a buffer of at least 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete as determined by the biological monitor to minimize impacts. In the event such species are identified within the limits of ground disturbance, Mitigation Measure 4.4.6.4B shall also apply. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Division.

The period between September 1st to January 14th is considered outside the nesting seas on and site preparation and
construction activities during this time would not be subject to nest surveys and monitoring as described above.

MM - 4.4.6.2B: Nesting Surveys: If it is determined that project- related grading or construction will affect nesting special status avian species, no grading or heavy equipment activity shall take place within the limits established in Mitigation Measure

4.4.6.1A until it has been determined by a qualified biologist that the nest/burrow is no longer active, and all juv eniles have fledged the nest/burrow. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Division.

MM - 4.4.6.2C: Burrowing Owl Pre -Construction Survey: To ensure direct mortality of burrowing owls is avoided, a pre - construction surv ey will be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance at the site. The pre-construction survey shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and submitted to the City.

This survey shall be required and conducted no more than 30 days prior to initiat ion of ground -disturbing activities. If construction is to be initiated during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) and burrowing owl is
determined to occupy any portion of the study area during the 30-day pre-construction survey, consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) shall take place and no construction activity shall take place within 500 feet of an active nest/burrow until it has been determined that the nest/b urrow is no longer Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

active and all juveniles have fledged the nest/burrow. No disturbance to active burrows shall occur without appropriate permitting through the USFWS and/or CDFW. If occupied
burrowing owls are identified in a development area, the burrows shall be avoided, if feasible. If it is not feasible to avoid the burrows, consultation with the Department will be necessary prior to relocating owls or compromising the burrows, and a Burrowing Owl Relocation Plan may be developed with approval from th e Wildlife Agencies and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority. To avoid active nests
adequately, no grading or heavy equipment activity shall take place within 250 feet of an active nest during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) and 160 feet during the non-breeding season. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department.

Riparian Habitat or Other
Sensitive Natural
Communities: The proposed
project would affect riparian
habitat through the discharge
of water from drainage
facilities into adjacent waters
MM - 4.4.6.3A: Deed Riparian/Riverine Area for Pyrite
Creek: Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that 0.29 acres of
Riparian/Riverine Area present onsite has been conserved in perpetuity by a qualified conservator such as the County of Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) or other approved conservation entity. This will mitigate for the loss of

0.145 acres (2:1 ratio) of such habitat to Pyrite Creek from project-related improvements along Limonite Avenue.

MM - 4.4.6.3B: Deed Riparian/Riverine Area for Santa Ana River: Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit, t he applicant shall demonstrate that up to 5.555 acres of
Riparian/Riverine Area present onsite has been conserved in perpetuity by a qualified conservator such as the County of Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) or other approved conservation entity. All Riparian/Riverine Areas located on the project site, including 3.195 acres of Southern Cottonwood/Willow Riparian Forest and 2.36 acres of the Santa Ana River will be avoided by the proposed project. The long-term preservation mechanism such as a restrictive covenant or conservation easement, shall include a restriction that access to these areas will not be allowed either by project residents or the general public.

Less than
significant.

Jurisdictional
Waters/Wetlands: The
project is also within the
jurisdiction of the Santa Ana
RWQCB. Under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act, the
RWQCB must certify that the
discharge of dredged or fill
material into Waters of the
United States does not violate
Federal, State, and local water
quality standards.

MM - 4.4.6.4A: Lake and Streambed Alteration : Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The following shall be incorporated into the permitting, subject to approval by the regulatory agencies.

Replacement and/or restoration of jurisdictional “waters of the State” within the Santa Ana River watershed at a ratio no less than 1:1 onsite or no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts. The applicant shall also restore any onsite or offsite temporary impact areas to pre‐project conditions and revegetate where applicable. Offsite mitigation may occur on land acquired for the purpose of in perpetuity preservation, or through the purchase Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022
of mitigation credits at an agency‐approved off‐site mitigation bank or within an agency accepted off‐site permittee‐
responsible mitigation area.

Habitat Fragmentation
/Wildlife Movement: The
project would significantly
fragment habitat or restrict
wildlife movement within the
project area and along Pyrite
Creek.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.4.6.1A through 4.4.6.1G and

4.4.6.4A.

Less than
significant.

Adopted Policies and/or
Ordinances: Compliance
with policies OS 9.3 and 9.4
require reuse of the existing
trees on the golf course to the
extent practical. The existing
golf course site contains
hundreds of trees of various
sizes and various species. The
loss of these trees could be a
potentially significant impact
to area biological resources
(e.g., nesting birds).

MM - 4.4.6.6A: Tree Preservation and Relocation Plan: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall provide a Tree Preservation and Relocation Plan prepared by a certified arborist to identify how and where the existing trees with the highest likelihood of survival shall be conserved onsite, either by preservation in place or relocation. This plan shall be consistent with the Tree Inspection Follow -Up Report prepared for the project (DEIR Appendix E).

MM - 4.4.6.6B: Implementation of Tree Preservation and
Relocation Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for each phase or tract map, the developer shall demonstrate that existing trees outlined in the Tree Preservation and Relocation Plan ( see Mitigation Measur e 4.4.6.6A ) have been either preserved in place or relocated within the phase or tract, as shown in the landscaping plan, to the extent practical. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Director in consultation with the applicant and the project arborist.

Less than
significant.

Adopted habitat
Conservation Plans: The
project site is located along an
approximately 3,400-foot-long
reach of the Santa Ana River
and contributes to reserve
assembly of MSHCP Criteria
Area Core A.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.4.6.1A through 4.4.6.1G and

4.4.6.3A and 4.4.6.3B.

Less than
significant.

Cumulative Biological
Resources Impacts: The
proposed project could have
significant impacts to
biological resources.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.4.6.1A through 4.4.6.1G, 4.4.6.2A through 4.4.6.2C, 4.4.6.3A and 4.4.6.3B, and 4.4.6.6A through

4.4.6.6C.

Less than
significant.

Cultural Resources
Archeological Resources: The
proposed project has the
potential to affect known or
previously undetected
subsurface archaeological
resources.

MM - 4.5.6.2A: Archaeological Monitoring Agreement: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley that a Cultural Resources Monitoring Agreement has been secured for qualified Tribal representatives, and that a professional archaeological monitor meeting Secretary of Interior standards has been retained by the Applicant to conduct monitoring of all mass grading and trenching activities and has the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earthmoving activities in the event Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022
that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist and Tribal representatives shall attend the pre -grading meet ing with the City and contractors to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring program.

MM - 4.5.6.2B: Native American Archaeological Monitoring:

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley that appropriate Native American representative(s), Project Archaeologist, and the Tribal representative(s) shall be allowed to monitor and have received a minimum of 30 days advance notice of all mass grading and trenching activities. During grading and trenching operations, the Tribal representatives and the project
archaeological monitor shall observe all mass grading and trenching activities per the Cultural Resources Monitoring Agreement. If the Tribal representatives suspect that an archaeological resource may have been unearthed, the
archaeologist, in consultation with the tribal representative, shall immediately halt and redirect grading operations in a 100- foot radius around the find to allow identification and evaluation of the suspe cted resource. In consultation with the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the archaeological monitor shall evaluate the suspected resource and make a determination of significance pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2.

MM - 4.5.6.2C: Treatment and Preservation Plan for
Archaeological Resources: If a significant archaeological resource(s) is discovered on the property, ground disturbing activities shall be suspended 100 feet around the resource(s).

The archaeological monitor and re presentatives of the
appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the Project Applicant, and the City Planning Department shall confer regarding mitigation of the discovered resource(s). A treatment plan and/or preservation plan shall be prepared and by the
archaeological monitor and reviewed by representatives of the appropriate Native American Tribe(s), the Project Applicant, and the City Planning Department and implemented by the archaeologist to protect the identified archaeological
resource(s) from damage and destruction. The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all archaeological artifacts that are of Native American origin found on the Project site to the culturally affiliated Native American tribe(s) for proper treatment and disposition. A final report c ontaining the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City Planning Department, the appropriate Native American tribe(s), and the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. All cultural material, excluding sacred, ceremonial, grave goods and human remains, collected during the grading monitoring program and from any previous archaeological studies or excavations on the project site shall be curated, as determined by the trea tment plan, MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

according to the current professional repository standards and may include a Gabrieleno Tribe curatorial facility.

MM - 4.5.6.2D: 100 -Foot Radius Protection for suspected Archaeological resources: Prior to grading permit issuance, the City shal l verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan: “If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground -disturbing activities and the archaeological monitor or Tribal representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100 -foot radius around the find and call the project archaeologist and the Tribal representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find."
Paleontological Resources:

The project site is underlain
by Holocene alluvium that
overlies Pleistocene alluvial
sediments. The Pleistocene
Alluvium beneath the project
site does have the potential to
yield paleontological
resources.

MM - 4.5.6.3A: Paleontological Monitoring: Excavation of areas ide ntified as likely to contain palaeontologic resources, such as any undisturbed subsurface Pleistocene sediments, will be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor. If paleontological resources (fossils) are discovered during project grading, work wi ll be halted in that area until a qualified paleontologist can assess the significance of the find. The project paleontologist shall monitor remaining earthmoving activities at the project site and shall be equipped to record and salvage fossil resources that may be unearthed during grading activities.

The paleontologist shall be empowered to temporarily halt or divert grading equipment to allow recording and removal of the unearthed resources. Any fossils found shall be evaluated in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines and offered for curation at an accredited facility approved by the City of Jurupa Valley. A report of findings, including, when appropriate, an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance, should be prepare d upon completion of the steps outlined above. The report and inventory, when submitted to the appropriate lead agency, would signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts on palaeontologic resources. This measure shall be implemented to the satisf action of the City Planning Department.

Less than
significant.

Cumulative Cultural and
Paleontological Resources:

Implementation of the
proposed project and related
off-site improvements would
require measures to identify,
recover, and/or record any
cultural and/or
paleontological resource that
may occur within the project
limits.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.5.6.1, 4.5.6.2A through 4.5.6.2D, and 4.5.6.3A.

Less than
significant.

Geology and Soils
Seismic related ground
failure: The site has a low to
moderate susceptibility to
lateral displacement in the
MM - 4.6.6.1A: Geotechnical Assessment Recommendations:

The develop er shall follow the recommendations of the
geotechnical assessment conducted by Leighton and Associates, Inc. These recommendations include 1) over excavating the Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

southwest portion of the site,
and the southern portion of
the site may be susceptible to
differential settlement from
liquefaction.
near-surface soils in the southern portion of the site to a depth of 15 feet or the depth whe re groundwater is encountered, whichever is shallower, and 2) providing stiffened foundations, as described in Section 3.2 of the geotechnical report. In addition, seismic settlement damage potential in the south - central portion of the site shall be mitiga ted by placing two geogrid layers within the compacted fill under the proposed structures.

Unstable Soil: The project
site contains wet, soft soils
that are weaker than
overlying driers soils and are
potentially unstable. The
project site soils are also
severely corrosive to ferrous
metals.

MM - 4.6.6.2A: Stabilization Measures : If wet soils are encountered during grading, the developer shall use the stabilization measures suggested in the geotechnical report, such as working large, angular broken concrete, asphalt concrete, or rocks, with a maximum size of 12 inches, into the excavation bottom until the bottom is firm. This material must be placed such that the material is not nested and voids are not created between particles. In addition, wet soils shall be dried back or mixed with sufficient drier soil prior to being placed a s compacted fill. As an alternative, geogrid material may also be used with crushed rock to stabilize soft wet bottoms. This measure and any alternative methods of achieving safe
stabilization shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

MM - 4.6.6.2B: Consultation with Corrosion Engineer: Prior to issuance of building permits and placement of underground utilities within the project, the developer shall consult with a corrosion engineer. Non -ferrous buried pipe, or ferrous pipe protected by dielectric tape, polyethylene sleeves and/or other methods, shall be used as recommended by the engineer.

Corrosion information will be presented to the developer’s underground utility subcontractors. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Less than
significant.

Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change
Greenhouse Gas Emissions:

The project will produce
9,314 MT of CO2e/yr. which
are above the SCAMD’s
screening threshold of 3,000
MMTCO2e/yr.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.3.6.2A through 2H. Less than significant.

Cumulative Greenhouse Gas
and Climate Change
Emissions: The project
projected emissions are above
the SCAMD’s screening
thresholds.

Refer to Mitigation Measures 4.3.6.2A through 2H. Less than significant.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Onsite Conditions Involving
Hazardous Materials: The
project may be significantly
affected by onsite
MM - 4.8.6.1C: Monitoring of Remediation Activities: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a qualified professional shall be retained to observe remediation activities on identified features of concern or areas of possible contamination such as, but not limited to, the presence of underground facilities, b uried debris, Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

contamination by hazardous
materials.
waste drums, tanks, soil staining, or odorous soils. Further investigation and analysis may be necessary should such materials be encountered during grading and/or construction activities.

MM - 4.8.6.1D: Discovery of Suspected Hazardous Mater ials During Construction: If any areas of contaminated soil or other suspected hazardous materials are found during grading, work shall be halted in that area until a qualified hazmat professional can be retained to evaluate the find and determine the most appropriate remediation and disposal of any hazardous
materials. The grading contractor shall notify the City within 24 hours of discovering any suspected hazardous materials and shall inform the City as to the planned remediation of the material prior to initiating cleanup activities. Contaminated soil or other materials shall be transported and disposed of following established procedures by a licensed contractor, and appropriate sampling and testing shall be done to determine if all contaminated soil ha s been removed. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning
Department.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Operational-Related Water
Quality Impacts: During the
operational phase of any
urban use, the major source of
pollution in storm water
runoff will be contaminants
that have accumulated on the
land surface over which runoff
passes.

MM - 4.9.6.1A: Maintenance of Onsite Water Quality Basins:

The Home Owners Association (HOA) and all property owners shall be responsible to maintain all onsite water quality basins according to requirements in the guidance Water Quality Management Plan and/or subsequent site -specific Water
Quality Management Plans, and established guidelines of the Regional Water Quality Cont rol Board. Failure to properly maintain such basins shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of discretionary operating permits, and/or referral to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for review and possible action. This measure shall be implemen ted to the satisfaction of the City Land Development Division, in
consultation with the City Engineer, and Regional Water Quality Control Board.

MM - 4.9.6.1D: Groundwater : Prior to the issuance of any discretionary permit, the developer shall demonstrate to the City that locally derived groundwater from onsite wells will NOT be used on the project site, including for potable purposes, for irrigating any landscaped areas, or for irrigating any open space areas where human contact with groundwater may occur. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department and Public Works Director as
appropriate.

Less than
significant.

Land Use and Planning
Conflict with Land Use
Plans, Policies, or
Regulations (Regional): The
proposed project is not
consistent with SCAG’s
jobs/housing balance.

No feasible mitigation available Significant
and
unavoidable
MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022
Cumulative Land Use and
Planning Impacts: This
project will contribute to an
ongoing imbalance of jobs to
housing in this area, both now
and in the future.

No feasible mitigation available Significant
and
unavoidable
Noise
Short-term Construction
Noise Impacts: Due to the
proximity of adjacent
residential land uses,
construction noise impacts
are potentially significant and
mitigation is required.

MM - 4.12.6.1A: Construction Noise Reduction Plan: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Construction Noise Reduction Plan (CNRP) to the City for review and approval. The CNRP shall show how construction noise impacts will be limited near occupied residential dwellings. The CNRP shall include but not be limited to:
(1) During all project site excavation and grading, contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
(2) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment at least 300 feet away from the closest sensitive receptors to the project site (i.e., the single -family residences east of the site).
(3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and the closest noise-sensitive receptors to the project site (i.e., the single -family residences east of the site). (4) During all project site construction within a quarter mile of an inhabited dwelling, the construction contractor shall limit all construction -related activities to between the hours of 6:00 am to 6:00 pm on weekdays and Saturday during the months of June through September, and 7:00 am to 6:00 pm on weekdays and Saturday during the
months of October through May. No construction shall be permitted on Sundays or any federal holiday.
(5) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with approp riate noise attenuating devices.
(6) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. (7) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging.

MM - 4.12.6.1B: Notice of Construction: Prior to the star t of any construction -related activity on the site, the project developer shall post a notice at the project entrance at Limonite Avenue that is clearly visible to area residents. The notice shall give the name and telephone number of the construction
superintendent or other responsible person to whom residents can report excessive noise or other nuisance conditions on the project construction site. The sign shall be removed within 10 days of the completion of the last phase of project development.

This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department.

Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022

Long-term Noise Impacts:

The project would be
adding sensitive receptors
(residential) to an area
that exceeds a noise level
of 65 dBA. The project
does propose a sound wall
along Limonite Avenue
that according to Federal
Highway Administration
noise assessment
guidelines could reduce
the estimated noise level
“With Project” by 5 dBA.

However, the “With
Project” noise level would
still be greater than 65
dBA.

MM - 4.12.6.2A: Final Acoustical Study: Prior to issuance of building permit for each phase of development, the developer shall submit final acoustical studies based on actual building design and placement. The supplemental studies shall identify required wall weight and placement of noise control barrier (soundwall) along Limonite Avenue to ensure compliance to the City’s noise standards. At a minimum noise control barrier will be required to have a weight that is at least 3.5 pounds per square foot of face area without decorative cutout or line-of-site openings between the shielded area and the project site. Noise control barriers maybe constructed using one, or any
combination of the following material:
a. Masonry block;
b. Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), or one-inch- thick tongue and groove wood or sufficient weight per square foot;
c. Glass (1/4 thick), or other transparent material with sufficient weight per square foot; or
d. Earthen berm with landscaping.

A noise barrier must present a solid face from the top to bottom.

Preventable openings or decorative cutouts should not be made.

All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking to avoid flanking. In addition, supplemental acoustical studies shall require additional noise attenuation measures such as window glazing and mechanical ventilation if the proposed sound barrier does not sufficiently reduce the level of noise to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. As outlined in General Plan Policy N 8.6, any future exterior noise assessments shall use Level of Service C for traffic, and be based on designed road capacity or 20-year projection of development (whichever is less).

Less than
significant.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022
17 Population and Housing
Consistent with General
Plan Growth Policies: The
project would not be
consistent with the City’s
General Plan growth policies
because it contributes to a
continued imbalance of jobs to
housing in the region.

No feasible mitigation available. Significant
and
unavoidable
Population Growth: The
project would induce an
unplanned increase in the
population and the project
would significantly increase
population in a job poor-
housing rich area.

No feasible mitigation available. Significant
and
unavoidable
Cumulative Population and
Housing Impacts: The project
would contribute to
substantial unanticipated
population growth and is not
consistent with regional goals
related to jobs/housing
balance as it proposes new
unanticipated housing in a
housing rich area.

No feasible mitigation available. Significant
and
unavoidable
Transportation and Traffic
Conflict with Applicable
Circulation Plan and Traffic
and Level of Service: The
proposed project is generally
consistent with General Plan
goals and targets related to
traffic, it will not maintain
acceptable LOS and is
therefore inconsistent with
the General Plan.

MM - 4.16.6.2B: Onsite Circulation System: Prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit for each phase of the project, the following onsite improvements are required and shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:
(a) Construct an onsite circulation system per the detailed site plan and consistent with the Specific Plan Circulation Plan.

Provide project access roadways to Limonite Avenue and
Downey Street. Install stop signs, stop bars, and stop legends at all project access points on Downey Street. Install a traffic signal at t he project access point on Limonite Avenue. Install equestrian crossings and controls at the project’s two entrances off of Limonite Avenue.

MM - 4.16.6.2C: Safe Site Distances: Prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit for each tract within the Spec ific Plan, development shall provide adequate and safe sight distances at each project access and intersection within the project. A minimum of 275 feet of corner sight distance is required at each project access point on Downey Street. A limited use area shall be maintained where a clear line of sight can be established. The limited use area shall be used for the purpose of prohibiting or clearing obstructions to maintain adequate sight distance at intersections. The limited use area is to be kept clear of all obstructions, including vegetation to the degree practical. This Significant
and
unavoidable.

MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022
18 measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Cumulative traffic Impacts:

Potential short-term and long-
term cumulative traffic-
related impacts cannot be
reduced to less than
significant levels because the
City does not have authority
or control over all of the
affected transportation
facilities. Specifically, the City
does not have control over the
I-15 Freeway ramps for
Limonite Avenue.

No feasible mitigation available. Significant
and
unavoidable
Utilities and Service Systems
Water Supply and
Construction or Expansion
of Water
Treatment Facilities: The
project water demand of
233.3 acre-feet per year
would be within the existing
JCSD available supply even
with restrictions on imported
water. The proposed project
would therefore not require
the construction of new water
treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities.

However, a portion of the
project would be outside the
JCSD boundary and was not
considered by the WSA
MM - 4.17.1.6.1A: Reduction in Water Use: A Prior to issuance of building permits, project landscaping, irrigation, and building plans shall demonstrate the project achieves at least a 28 percent re duction in water use over “business as usual” conditions, consistent with State -mandated water conservation goals, in consultation with the Jurupa Community Service District.

MM – 4.17.1.6.1B: Annexation for Project Area outside of JCSD Boundaries: Prior to issuance of the first building permit for any portion of project development that is located outside of Jurupa Community Services District’s boundary, the area shall be annexed into the Jurupa Community Services District for the purpose of water and sewer service. The Project Proponent shall submit evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley that the property has been annexed in the form of a certified copy of the resolution adopted by the District’s Board of Directors approving the annexation and a subsequent submittal of the appropriate Local Agency Formation Commission certification.

Less than
significant.

Cumulative Impacts to
Water Supply Services: A
portion of the project would is
outside the JCSD boundary
and was not considered by the
WSA. Based on this, the
project’s water demand is
cumulatively significant.

Refer to Mitigation Measures: 4.17.1.6.1A and 4.17.1.6.1B. Less than significant.

Construction Expansion of
Electric and Natural Gas
Facilities: The proposed
project would substantially
increase the demand for both
electricity and natural gas,
which could cause the
construction or expansion of
Refer to Mitigation Measures: 4.4.6.2B, 4.4.6.2E, 4.4.6.G, and

4.4.6.2H from Air Quality Section.

Less than
significant
MA 22051
Previous Environmental Determination
August 25, 2022
19 electrical and natural gas
facilities in the project area.

Cumulative Impacts to
Energy Facilities: The
proposed project would
potentially contribute to a
cumulatively significant
increase in demand for
electricity and natural gas.

Refer to Mitigation Measures: 4.4.6.2B, 4.4.6.2E, 4.4.6.G, and

4.4.6.2H from Air Quality Section.

Less than
significant
Conclusion:

The Project site remains substantially in the same physical condition as it was in 20 16, except that development is taking place in the immediate vicinity consistent with the FEIR.

The Project is required to comply with the existing PPPs and MMs per Resolution Number 2016- 15 certifying the FEIR.

Based on the preceding analysis, t he request for MA22051 and VTTM38257 is within the scope of the analysis contained in the FEIR and the Project does not create new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of previously analyzed impacts as compared to those identified previously.

Exhibit “C”
Conditions of Approval
PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 1 of 15 ends

EXHIBIT C

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

1. PROJECT PERMITTED. MA22051 (VTTM38257) is for an approval for subdivision, and a Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP) to construct 118 condominiums at the southwest corner of Limonite Avenue, and Beach Street (APN : 162-230-012). Signs are not a part of this approval.

2. INDEMNIFY CITY. The applicant, the property owner or other holder of the right to the development entitlement(s) or permit(s) approved by the City for the project, if different from the applicant (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitor”), shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Jurupa Valley and its elected city council, its appointed boards, commissions, and committees, and its officials, employees, and agents (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, fines, penalties, and expenses, including without limitation litigation expenses and attorney’s fees, arising out of either (i) the City’s approval of the project, including without limitation any judicial or administrative proceeding initiated or maintained by any person or entity challenging the validity or enforceability of any City permit or approva l relating to the project, any condition of approval imposed by City on such permit or approval, and any finding or determination made and any other action taken by any of the Indemnitees in conjunction with such permit or approval, including without limitation any action taken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), or (ii) the acts, omissions, or operations of the Indemnitor and the directors, officers, members, partners, employees, agents, contractors, and subcontractors of each person or entity comprising the Indemnitor with respect to the ownership, planning, design, construction, and maintenance of the project and the property for which the project is being approved.

The City shall notify the
Indemnitor of any claim, lawsuit, or other judicial or administrative proceeding (herein, an “Action”) within the scope of this indemnity obligation and request that the Indemnitor defend such Action with legal counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City. If the Indemnitor fails to so defend the Action, the City shall have the right but not the obligation to do so and, if it does, the Indemnitor shall promptly pay the City’s full cost thereof.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indemnity obligation under clause (i) of the first sentence of this condition shall not apply to the extent the claim arises out of the willful misconduct or the sole active negligence of the City.

3. CONSENT TO CONDITIONS. Within thirty (30) days after project approval, the owner or designee shall submit written consent to the required conditions of approval to the Community Development Director or designee.

4. FEES. The approval of MA22051 (VTTM38257) shall not become effective until all Community Development fees have been paid in full.

5. INCORPORATE CONDITIONS. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project, the owner or designee shall inc lude within the first four pages of the working drawings a list of all conditions of approval imposed by the project’s final approval.

6. APPROVAL PERIOD – VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP . Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 38257 shall expire on September 28, 2025, 36 months after approval, unless within that period of time a final map shall have been approved and filed with the County of Riverside Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 2 of 15 ends

7. CONFORMANCE TO APPROVED EXHIBITS. The project shall be in conformance to the approved plans (listed below) with any changes in accordance to these conditions of approval:
a. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) No. 382527 (dated: 8/31/2022); b. Site Plan (dated: 9/15/2022)
c. Plotting Plan (dated: 7/13/2022)
d. Architectural Elevations and Floor Plans (dated 8/4/2022); e. Landscape Concept (dated: 9/1/2022);
f. Lighting Plan (dated: 7/26/2022); and
g. Trash Enclosure Exhibit (dated 8/8/2022)

8. MITIGATION MEASURES. This project shall be subject to, and comply with, all of the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted by Resolution No. 2016-15 in connection with the adoption of an Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan.

9. GENERAL MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY. The applicant shall maintain the property including the removal of debris, weeds, abandoned vehicles, code violations, and any other factor or condition that may contribute to potential blight or crime.

10. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. The property owner shall maintain all landscaped areas as approved on the final landscape plans in an orderly, attractive and healthy condition.

This shall include proper pruning, mowing of turf areas, weeding, removal of litter, fertilization, replacement of plants when necessary, and the regular application of appropriate quantities of water to all landscaped areas. The property owner shall maintain all irrigation systems as approved on the final landscape plans in proper operating condition. Waterline breaks, head/emitter ruptures, overspray or runoff conditions and other irrigation system failures shall be repaired immediately. The applicant shall maintain canopy trees in a manner that they provide the required shade coverage and encourages the canopy to grow to provide shade. The applicant shall avoid topping trees or pruning the trees in a manner that the trees do not achieve mature height and form.

11. ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS. The site shall provide and install infrastructure for five (5) Electrical Vehicle (EV) Charging stations. EV charg ing station plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

The five (5) charging stations shall be fully constructed prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy for the development project.

12. DRIVEWAY ENHANCEMENTS. All driveways leading directly into the project site shall have design enhancements such as decorative paving. Said enhancements shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

13. UNDERGROUNDING OF DRAINAGE. Driveway and parking areas shall not incorporate center swales, ribbon gutters, concrete valleys, etc. All drainage in common and private use areas shall be underground and shall not incorporate open gutters or swales.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 3 of 15 ends

14. STREET TREES. All street trees shall be a minimum of 36” box trees.

15. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit , the aesthetic impact of slopes and grade differences where the project adjoins streets or other properties shall be approved by the Community Development Director.

16. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREA. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer prior to the recordation of the final map, providing for maintenance of the property in perpetuity. The CC& Rs shall, at a minimum, include provisions for the following items unless it is deemed unnecessary by the Co mmunity Development Director:
a. Formation of a Permanent Organization for the ownership and maintenance of all common areas including, but not limited to, landscaping, parking areas, and circulation systems (areas) in perpetuity.
b. The CC&Rs shall identify the common areas for ownership and maintenance. The common areas shall include the following applicable items:
i. Access and Circulation Areas
ii. Drainage Facilities
iii. Landscaping and Irrigation
iv. On-site Lighting Fixtures
v. Walls and Fences
vi. All on-site storm water and w ater quality management post -construction facilities and features (BMPs) shall require maintenance by the property owner(s). Regulations for operations and maintenance shall be clearly stated in the CC&Rs.
vii. A cross -lot drainage easement/agreement shall be r equired among parcel(s).
viii. Only residents abutting the private court shall have access directly to and from their respective unit/garage.
ix. Other items the Community Development Director and City Engineer deem appropriate.

17. ON-SITE LANDSCAPING. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project, a “Professional Services” (PROS) application shall be approved by the Community Development Director. The PROS application shall include the following items:
a. Final (construction set) on-site landscape plans;
b. Completed City Agreement for Landscape improvements
c. City Faithful Performance Bond for Landscape improvements; performance bond shall be posted at 110% of the total cost approved estimate of landscaping, irrigation, labor, and one -year maintenance. The Community Development Director may consider a cash bond if appropriate.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 4 of 15 ends

Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the development project, the following events shall be satisfied in the order listed below:
a. Substantial Conformance Letter: The Landscape Architect of Record shall conduct an inspection and submit a letter to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department after the landscape architect has deemed the installation is in conformance to the approved plans; and b. City Inspection: The City landscape architect shall conduct an inspection of the installation to confirm the landscape and irrigation plan was constructed in accordance to the approved plans. Applicant shall pay any fees as sociate with the City inspection(s).

18. GRAFFITI PROTECTION FOR WALLS. Plans that include anti -graffiti coating or protection for the exterior side of all perimeter walls and exterior of building walls to half the height of the structure, to a maximum of 12 feet, shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project . Graffiti shall be removed from the property within 24 hours.

19. TRASH COLLECTION.
a. Detailed plans for trash enclosure(s) shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project. Walls of the enclosure and any solid gates shall have graffiti protection coating. All trash enclosure gates shall be self - closing.
b. An approval or clearance letter from the waste collection agency shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

20. OUTDOOR LIGHTING. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be maintained in good condition. Light fixtures shall be downward facing, shielded to prevent any light from flooding onto adjacent properties, and reflecting into the sky.

A photometric plan and exhibits of lighting fixtures shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

21. WALL AND FENCE PLAN. A Wall & Fence plan, including elevations, colors, and materials, shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

22. BACKFLOW DEVICES. The location o f all backflow devices , and any required screening of it, shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project. Backflow devices shall be located the gr eatest extent possible from the front property line.

23. UTILITY METERS. Utility meters affixed to the exterior walls of buildings shall not be visible from the internal private street. Where possible, exceptions can be made, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 5 of 15 ends

24. MAILBOXES. The design of all mailboxes shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

25. OUTDOOR POOL SHOWERS. The private swimming pool area shall be equipped with a minimum of two (2) outdoor showers. Showers shall be screened from the street, private walkways, and homes.

26. JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT (JARPD). Prior to the issuance of the first building perm it for a residential unit of the development project, the applicant shall annex into the existing Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (JARPD) District -Wide Community Facilities District (CFD) or form a new Community Facilities District (CFD) to contribute to the cost of park maintenance.

27. IMPACT FEES. The applicant shall pay the following impact fees (unless exempt) in accordance to Title 3 of the Municipal Code:
a. Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program . The applicant shall pay any owed DIFs by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.75 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
b. Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation (MSHCP) Fee. The applicant shall pay any owed MSHCP fees by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Municipal Code.
c. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program . The applicant shall pay any owed TUMFs by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.70 of the Municipal Code.

28. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING. The Project shall be subject to and the applicant has agreed to comply with the inclusionary housing unit requirement , not to exceed 7 % of the overall development, and/or the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee, not to exceed $2.50 per square foot . Within thirty (30) days after the project’s approval, the applicant shall notify the Community Development Director in writing the method by which the applicant proposes to satisfy the inclusionary housing unit requirement and/or the inclusionary housing in-lieu fee requirement.

29. LINEAR PARK – PLANNING AREA 5. No more than 125 building permits sha ll be released for the entire Paradise Knolls Specific Plan (Planning Areas 1 through 6) prior to the beginning of construction (grading) of the 4.25-acre linear park to be located in Planning Area 5.

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

30. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (ENGINEERING)

32.1. The use hereby conditioned is for a Schedule “A” subdivision, Vesting Tentative Tract No. 38257(TTM38257); being a subdivision of Lot 7 of Tract Map No. 36822 (TR36822), in Book 465, Pages 69 through 73, inclusive, of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California; more particularly Assessor’s Parcel Number 162-230-012; containing 7.94 acres gross. Lots 1 through 3, inclusive, are for residential and open space purposes; Lots “A” through “N”, inclusive, will be dedicated as private roads. The following e xhibit is hereby referenced: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.38257, prepared by Adams Streeter Civil Engineers, dated July 19, 2022.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 6 of 15 ends

32.2. The Tract Map preparation shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and the City of Jurupa Valley Munic ipal Code ; as it pertains to Schedule “A” subdivision, unless otherwise modified by the conditions listed herein.

32.3. It is assumed that the tentative map and site plan exhibits are all inclusive of a parcel or parcels of land legally subdivided in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, and local ordinance.

32.4. It is assumed that any easements shown on the referenced exhibits are shown correctly and include all the easements that encumber the subject property. The Applicant shall secure approval from all (if any) easement holders for all grading and improvements which are proposed over the respective easement or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, easement holder cannot be found, or is otherwise of no affect. Should such approvals or alternate action regarding the easements not be provided, the Applicant may be required to amend or revise the permit.

32.5. Improvements such as landscaping, streetlights, and other street infrastructure within the dedicated private right -of-way as shown on the referenced exhibit shall be maintained by a Home Owner’s Association (HOA) unless otherwise maintained by a public agency.

32.6. The Applicant provided a Focused Traffic Assessment (FTA) for Lot 7 of TR36822, prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., dated July 21, 2022. The Engineering Department has reviewed the findings of the report and finds them acceptable. Fair share contribution for the improvements at the intersection of Beach Street and Limonite Avenue as specified in these conditions of approval shall be required. Applicant shall also be responsible for any fair share contributions specified in the approved “Paradise Knolls Mixed Use Development Traffic Impact Analysis” for the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan.

33. PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT (ENGINEERING)

33.1. In compliance with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, Chapter 8.70, no grading permit shall be issued until the Tentative Tract Map (TTM) and all other pertinent Planning permits are approved and are in effect.

33.2. All grading shall conform to the Califo rnia Building Code, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley, the City’s Municipal Code Title 8, and all other relevant laws, rules, and regulations governing grading in the City of Jurupa Valley and state of California. Grading shall be performed in accord ance with the recommendations of the approved project specific geotechnical report.

Grading plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and financial securities for grading, if applicable, shall be in place prior to permit issuance.

33.2.1. Prior to approval of the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare a project specific geotechnical report for review and approval of the City Engineer for Lots 7 and 9 of TR36822 (PA2).

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 7 of 15 ends

33.2.2. A Geotechnical Due Diligence Review for the geotechnical recommendations, pertaining to PA2, outlined in the Paradise Knolls Specific Plan Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report, was previously prepared by Leighton & Associates, Inc., dated December 7, 2020. Applicant shall address outstanding comments on the Interoffice Memorandum dated August 26, 2022, pertaining to the above-mentioned technical document.

33.2.3. Any special considerations during grading operations with respect to the interim water quality basin as shown in the referenced exhibit shall be included in the report.

33.3. The Applicant shall prepare a “rough” grading plan or a combined “rough and precise” grading plan for the project site.

33.3.1. The grading plan shall be prepared under the supervision of a civil engineer licensed in the state of California (Project Civil Engineer) and he/she must sign the plan. The printed name and contact information of the Project Civil Engineer shall be included on the face of the grading plan. The grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.

33.3.2. The grading plan shall provide for accep tance and proper disposal of all off -site drainage flowing onto or through the site.

Should the quantities of flow exceed the capacity of the conveyance facility, the Applicant shall provide adequate drainage facilities and/or appropriate easement(s), if n ecessary, as approved by the City Engineer.

33.3.3. The grading plan shall provide for protection of downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a drainage easement(s), if necessary, as approved by the City Engineer.

33.3.4. Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented immediately following rough gra ding to prevent transport and deposition of earthen materials onto downstream/downwind properties, public rights -of-way, or other drainage facilities.

Erosion Control Plans showing these measures shall be
submitted along with the grading plan for approval by the City Engineer.

33.3.5. Applicant shall provide written proof and authorization from easement holders (if any) for work proposed over easements.

33.4. If grading is required offsite, the Applicant shall obtain a written notarized letter of authorization from the property owner(s) to grade as necessary and provide a copy to the Engineering Department. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and/or PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 8 of 15 ends

authorizations necessary to perform the grading shown on the site plan and grading exhibits.

33.5. All required mitigations for any applicable paleontological, archeological, or cultural resources issues shall be satisfied in accordance with the Environmental Mitigation & Monitoring Reporting Program.

33.6. A hauling permit shall be required for the import/export of material using City streets; the import/export location and the haul route shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. If the import/export location is outside of City limits, the Applicant shall provide evidence that the jurisdictional agency has provided all necessary approvals for import/export to/from the site.

33.7. Prior to approval of the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare a detailed final flood hazard/hydrology report for review and approval of the City Engineer for PA2.

33.7.1. The project proposes interim and final stormwater BMPs to capture and treat the onsite and offsite runoff from PA2. Applicant shall be responsible for the design and construction of both interim and final stormwater improvements. If any of the stormwater i mprovements are proposed to be completed by others, Applicant shall provide proof of responsibility for the design and construction of the improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
 Interim Condition: Runoff will be conveyed to an interim infiltration basin as shown in the referenced exhibit.

Overflow will sheet flow southerly through Lot 4 of TR36822 (PA5) to the Santa Ana River.
 Final Condition: The interim infiltration basin will be resized and relocated as shown in the WQMP Exhibit for
TTM36823. Runoff from PA2 will be conveyed to the
infiltration basin through public storm drain lines. Final design of the infiltration basin will treat the runoff from the drainage management areas identified in the WQMP Exhibit for TTM36823. Overflow will discharge into a levee along the southerly portion of Lot 5 of TR36822 (PA6) and into the Santa Ana River.

33.7.2. The Final Hydrology Report shall consider the grading plans and the impacts stormwater infiltration may have on the public roadway for the interim condition. The placement of the interim infiltration basin shall not impede the effective drainage of Rancho Jurupa Drive and shall comply with the general roadway drainage considerations for safety and clear recovery zone (CRZ) concept in the latest AASHTO manual, unless otherwise
determined by the City Engineer.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 9 of 15 ends

33.7.3. The placement of the interim infiltration basin a nd the point of discharge to the basin are subject to review of the storm drain and grading improvement plans by the City Engineer and may be required to be located differently. The Applicant shall coordinate with the property owner(s) of PA1 and PA5 for the construction of the interim improvements. Prior to the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall obtain a written notarized letter of authorization from the property owner(s) to construct and relocate the above - mentioned improvements. A copy of the lett er shall be provided to the Engineering Department. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and/or permissions necessary for the interim
infiltration basin.

33.8. Prior to the approval of the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, a Final Water Quality Management Plan (F-WQMP) for PA2 in conformance with the requirements of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCDC&WCD) for the Sa nta Ana River Watershed for approval of the City Engineer.

33.8.1. The F-WQMP shall provide any changes in pervious/impervious areas and BMPs.

33.8.2. Any onsite and offsite BMPs shall be designed and sized per the findings of the F -WQMP. Any changes to the proposed BMP sizing, design, and type; and impacts to the referenced exhibit(s), may require additional approvals.

33.9. Post-construction water quality surface features and facilities such as basins and bio-swales shall be designed and installed per approved project -specific WQMP and approved by the Engineering Inspector.

33.10. For disturbance of one or more acres, the Applicant shall provide evidence that it has prepared and submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPP P). The SWRCB issued WDID number shall be included on the face of the grading plan.

34. PRIOR TO TRACT MAP RECORDATION (ENGINEERING)

34.1. No Final Tract Map shall be recorded until all other related Planning cases are approved, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

34.2. After approval of the vesting tentative map and prior to the expiration of said map, the Applicant shall cause the real property included within the vesting tentative map exhibit, or any part thereof, to be surveyed; and a Final Tract Map thereo f shall be prepared in accordance to the City Engineer’s requirements, conditions of vesting tentative map approval, and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 7.20. All processing shall be through the City of Jurupa Valley.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 10 of 15 ends

34.3. Limonite Avenue along the project frontage is a City maintained road and classified as Major Roadway in the City’s General Plan Mobility Element.

Additional right-of-way was previously dedicated and accepted per TR36822.

The Applicant shall be responsible for the following along Limonite Avenue:

34.3.1. Dedicating on the Final Tract Map abutter’s rights of access along the northerly property line abutting Limonite Avenue. Lot access shall be restricted along Limonite Avenue.

34.4. Beach Street along the project frontage was previously dedicated and accepted per TR36822 as a public road with an ultimate right-of-way width of 98-ft. Applicant shall be responsible for landscape improvements within the westerly parkway of Beach Street.

34.5. Rancho Jurupa Drive along the project frontage was previously dedicated and accepted per TR36822 as a public road with an ultimate right-of-way width of 56-ft. Applicant shall provide full width street improvements from Beach Street to the westerly property line of the project site unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer.

34.6. Internal private streets “A”, “B”, and “C” to the subdivision shall be designed and improved to full width within the private dedicated right -of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 105 as show n on the referenced exhibit. Applicant shall dedicate public use easements for public utilities and drainage purpose together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles.

34.7. Private courts (Lots D through N inclusive) shall be improved as shown on VTTM38257. Applicant shall dedicate public use easements for public utilities and drainage purpose together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles.

Improvement Plans

34.8. The Applicant shall provide improvement plans for all onsite and offsite improvements including, but not limited to, street improvements, striping and pavement markings, streetlights, landscape and irrigation system, water system, and sanitary sewer system. All plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Riverside County Transportation Department “Improvement Plan Check Policies and Guidelines” as adopted by the City Engineer. All improvements plans shall be processed through the City for approval of the City Engineer.

34.8.1. The Applicant shall be responsible for the design and construction of the Traffic Mitigation Measures referenced in the FTA for this project and any other required improvements specified in these conditions of approval.

34.9. Rancho Jurupa Drive

34.9.1. 36-ft pavement section (18 -ft northerly and 18 -ft southerly of centerline measured from curb face to curb face).

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 11 of 15 ends

34.9.2. 10-ft northerly and 10 -ft southerly parkway to include 5 -ft sidewalk, curb adjacent landscaping, curb & gutter, and streetlights.

34.9.3. Traffic safety shall be considered for the interim infiltration basin at the end of Rancho Jurupa Drive. The interim infiltration basin shall provide a traversable section for errant traffic leaving the traveled way within the CRZ per the latest Highway Design Manual and/or an approved barrier at the discretion of the City Engineer

34.10. Intersection of Beach Street (NS) and Limonite Avenue (EW)

34.10.1. Applicant shall pay a fair share contribution for the new traffic signal as determined by the City Engineer.

34.11. Intersection of Beach Street (NS) and “C” Street (EW)

34.11.1. Turning movements shall be restricted to right -in and right-out only.

34.11.2. Modify geometries to provide:
 Northbound: Two through lanes.
 Southbound: One through lane and one shared
through/right-turn lane.
 Eastbound: One right-turn lane.
 Westbound: N/A.

34.12. Intersection of “A” Street (NS) and Rancho Jurupa Drive (EW)

34.12.1. Install geometries to provide:
 Northbound: N/A
 Southbound: One shared left turn/right-turn lane.
 Eastbound: One shared through/left-turn lane.
 Westbound: One shared through/right-turn lane.

34.12.2. Property line corner cut -back and curb return radius shall be per Riverside County Standard No. 805.

34.13. Intersection of Beach Street (NS) and Rancho Jurupa Drive (EW)

34.13.1. Applicant shall be responsible for the design and construction of a one -lane mini roundabout intersection. Design and PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 12 of 15 ends

construction shall be consistent with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer subject to feasibility .

34.14. Internal Private Streets

34.14.1. Streets “A” through “C” inclusive are internal to the subdivision and shall be designated on the Final Tract Map as lettered lots.

Road cross -section, intersection design, and included
improvements shall be as approved by the City Engineer.

34.14.2. Marked crosswalks to the recreational area shall be provided at the intersection of Street “A” and Street “B” and the intersection of Street “B” and Street “C” as shown on the referenced exhibit.

34.14.3. The private courts connecting to Street “B” as shown in the referenced exhibit shall have a minimum curb return radius of 5-ft, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

34.15. The construction of ADA compliant depressed curbs and access ramps shall be required at the following intersections:

34.15.1. Street “B” and Street “C”

34.15.2. Street “B” and Street “A”

34.15.3. Street “C” and Beach Street

34.15.4. Rancho Jurupa Drive and Street “A”

34.15.5. Rancho Jurupa Drive and Beach Street

34.16. Improvements shall provide appropriate transition to adjacent existing and future infrastructure; design of transition shall be reviewed an d approved by the City Engineer.

L&LMD, CFD, and Special Districts

34.17. Prior to final map recordation, Applicant shall annex into the CFD No.2019 - 001 Paradise Knolls for operation and maintenance purposes of various improvements in the public right -of-way, as approved by the City Engineer.

The annexation to the CFD shall be in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney.

34.18. Prior to final map recordation, Applicant shall annex into the CFDPS No.2021- 001 for City Public Safety Services. The agree ment to annex to a CFD for Public Safety Services shall be in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Participation in a CFD is intended to fully mitigate the incremental impact of new development on City public safety costs and PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 13 of 15 ends

maintain such levels of service at the standards established in the City’s General Plan.

34.19. Should this project be within any assessment/benefit district, the Applicant shall make application for and pay any reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the assessment/benefit district.

Utilities

34.20. Domestic water system improvement plans shall be prepared for required improvements for approval of the Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) and concurrence of the City Engineer. Water system improvemen t plans showing the locations of fire hydrants (see County Standard 400) off-site and on-site must also be approved by Riverside County Fire Department.

Necessary easements for water systems on -site, as determined by JCSD, shall be shown on the Final Tract Map “to be dedicated by separate instrument.

34.21. Electrical power, telephone, communication, street lighting, and cable television lines shall be designed to be placed underground in accordance with City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Title 7. The Developer is responsible for coordinating the work with the serving utility company. A disposition note describing the above shall be reflected on design improvement plans whenever those plans are required. Written proof confirming initiation of the design and/or application or the relocation, issued by the utility company, shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for verification purposes.

35. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT (ENGINEERING)

35.1. All grading and construction of infrastructure improvements within the public and private right -of-way in accordan ce with the approved plans, the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.70, and all other applicable requirements, shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

35.2. The Project geotechnical/soils engineer shall provide a Final Grading Certification, certifying to the completion of the grading in conformance with the approved grading plans, the recommendation of the Geotechnical/Soils report approved for this project and the California Building Code.

35.3. A licensed land surveyor or civil eng ineer shall certify to the completion of grading in conformance with the lines and grades shown on the approved grading plans.

35.4. The Project Civil Engineer shall provide Record ("As -built") Drawings of grading and all infrastructure improvements.

35.5. Improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, a site specific improvement agreement shall be signed by the City, and financial securities shall be in place prior to permit issuance.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 14 of 15 ends

35.6. The Applicant shall submit cost estimates for the fair share improvements referenced in these conditions of approval for review and approval of the City Engineer.

35.7. The Applicant is responsible for completing construction of all post - construction water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) facilities and features. These facilities and features shall be operated and maintained under the City’s CFD.

35.8. All utility extensions within the site shall be placed underground unless otherwise specified or allowed by these conditions of approval.

35.8.1. Utility extensions from the mainline or othe r points of connection within the public right -of-way require that the Applicant obtain an Encroachment Permit from the
Engineering Department. The City shall make a final inspection of work to verify that any impacts that the work might have had to other City owned infrastructure is restored or repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

36. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION/ CERTIFICATE OF

OCCUPANCY (ENGINEERING)

36.1. The Applicant is responsible for the completion of all grading within the corresponding parcel for which occupancy is requested.

36.2. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, all improvements within the public and private right-of-way shall be completed and accepted by the City.

36.3. Prior to completion and acceptance of improvements or prior to the final building inspection, whichever occurs first and as determined by the City Engineer, assurance of maintenance is required by the completion of annexation into the CFD No.2019-001 Paradise Knolls for all applicable improvements specified in these conditions of approval.

36.4. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall complete the annexation into the CFDPS No.2021-002 for public safety.

36.5. All fair share payments for improvements specified in these conditions of approval shall be paid to the City.

36.6. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, A pplicant shall e nsure that all streetlights within the public right of way, required from this project, are energized.

36.7. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall obtain acceptance of applicable improvements by JCSD. Written proof shall be provided to the Engineering Department.

36.8. All applicable mitigation measures contained in the environmental documentation and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for Paradise Knolls as it pertains to the project site shall be satisfied.

PARADISE KNOLLS PLANNING AREA 2 – LOT 7 (MA22051) REVISED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VTTM38257)

Page 15 of 15 ends

36.9. The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 3.75. – Development Impact Fee of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code , as amended, which requires the payment of the appropriate fee set forth in the Ordinance in accordance with the fee schedule in effect at the time of the final inspection.

The Applicant hereby agrees that these Conditions of Approval are valid, lawful, and binding on the Applicant, and its successors and assigns, and agrees to the Conditions of Approval.

Applicant’s name (Print Form): _
Applicant’s name (Signature):

Date:

ATTACHMENT 3: PROJECT PLANS

/0/1/2/3/3/i255/5/6/7/i255/8/9/10/11/9/7/12/i255/13/14/15/16/17/i255/0/3/18/12/i255/19/10/20/15/7/17/12/i255/21/22/i255/23/24/1/18/1/i255/25/i255/23/26/23/27/26/2/26/27/24/28/28/18/i255/25/i255/9/29/9/11/30/31/30/16/10/17/17/16/17/10/27/32/6/11 /33/34/35/34/36/37
/36/38/39/34/40
/41/42/34/41/i255/44/40/45/46
/47/48/49/34/42/50/47/38/51/40/i255/41/42/34/41 /52/53/54/55/52/54/56 /49/34/42/50/47/38/51/40/i255/41/42/34/41 /54/57/55/58/57/59 /39/38/39/41/33/i255/41/42/34/41 /60/53/57/55/61/62/54
/0/1/2/3/3/i255/5/6/7/i255/8/9/10/11/9/7/12/i255/13/14/15/16/17/i255/0/3/18/12/i255/19/10/20/15/7/17/12/i255/21/22/i255/23/24/1/18/1/i255/25/i255/23/26/23/27/26/2/26/27/24/28/28/18/i255/25/i255/9/29/9/11/30/31/30/16/10/17/17/16/17/10/27/32/6/11

9'-1"9'-1"
±30'-7"
Roof Plan
Scale:1/8"=1'-0"
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
8:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
Material Legend

1. Asphalt Shingle Roof

2. Stucco

3. Trim

4. Sectional Garage Door

5. Entry Door

6. Light Fixture

7. Attic Vent

8. Horizontal Siding

9. Recessed Window

10. Metal Railing

11. Board and Batten Siding
Color Legend
A. Roof: Westlake Cottage
Shingle - Ironwood HD
B. Stucco: SW 9542 Natural
White
C. Trim/Fiber Cement Panels:

SW 7069 Iron Ore
D. Garage Door: SW 6075
Garret Gray
E. Entry Door: Therma Tru
Doors - Rustic Clay
F. Siding: Hardie Plank Lap
Siding,The Statement
Collections, Arctic White
G. Siding: Hardie Plank Lap
Siding,The Statement
Collections, Night Gray
0 4 8 16
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A2.0BUILDING ELEVATION 4 PLEX

MODERN FARMHOUSE
9'-1"9'-1"
±30'-1"
Roof Plan
Scale:1/8"=1'-0"
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE

VALLEYVA
LLEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL
LEY
VA
LLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VALL
EY
VALLE
Y
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL
LEY
VALLE
Y
4:12
4:12
0 4 8 16
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A2.1BUILDING ELEVATION 4 PLEX

CRAFTSMAN
Material Legend

1. Asphalt Shingle Roof

2. Stucco

3. Trim

4. Sectional Garage Door

5. Entry Door

6. Light Fixture

7. Decorative Corbels

8. Board and Batten Siding

9. Recessed Window

10. Fiber Cement Panel

11. Metal Railing
Color Legend
A. Roof: Westlake Cottage
Shingle - Ironwood HD
B. Stucco 1: SW 6175 Sagey
C. Stucco 2: SW 7052 Gray
Area
D. Board & Batten: SW 6179
Artichoke
E. Trim/Fiber Cement Panels:

SW 9608 Habitat
F. Garage Door / Entry Door:

SW 7054 Oak Leaf Brown
9'-1"9'-1"
±30'-7"
Roof Plan
Scale:1/8"=1'-0"
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
8:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
Material Legend

1. Asphalt Shingle Roof

2. Stucco

3. Trim

4. Sectional Garage Door

5. Entry Door

6. Light Fixture

7. Attic Vent

8. Horizontal Siding

9. Recessed Window

10. Metal Railing

11. Board and Batten Siding
Color Legend
A. Roof: Westlake Cottage
Shingle - Ironwood HD
B. Stucco: SW 9542 Natural
White
C. Trim/Fiber Cement Panels:

SW 7069 Iron Ore
D. Garage Door: SW 6075
Garret Gray
E. Entry Door: Therma Tru
Doors - Rustic Clay
F. Siding: Hardie Plank Lap
Siding,The Statement
Collections, Arctic White
G. Siding: Hardie Plank Lap
Siding,The Statement
Collections, Night Gray
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A2.2BUILDING ELEVATION 5 PLEX

MODERN FARMHOUSE
9'-1"9'-1"
±30'-1"
Roof Plan
Scale:1/8"=1'-0"
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL
LEY
VAL
LEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL
LEY
VAL
LEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VAL
LEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE

VALLEY VA
LLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE

VALLEY VA
LLEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
Material Legend

1. Asphalt Shingle Roof

2. Stucco

3. Trim

4. Sectional Garage Door

5. Entry Door

6. Light Fixture

7. Decorative Corbels

8. Board and Batten Siding

9. Recessed Window

10. Fiber Cement Panel

SW 9608 Habitat
F. Garage Door / Entry Door:

SW 7054 Oak Leaf Brown
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A2.3BUILDING ELEVATION 5 PLEX

CRAFTSMAN
9'-1"9'-1"
±30'-7"
Roof Plan
Scale:1/8"=1'-0"
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
8:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
8:12
8:12
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
8:12
Material Legend

1. Asphalt Shingle Roof

2. Stucco

3. Trim

4. Sectional Garage Door

5. Entry Door

6. Light Fixture

7. Attic Vent

8. Horizontal Siding

9. Recessed Window

10. Metal Railing

11. Board and Batten Siding
Color Legend
A. Roof: Westlake Cottage
Shingle - Ironwood HD
B. Stucco: SW 9542 Natural
White
C. Trim/Fiber Cement Panels:

SW 7069 Iron Ore
D. Garage Door: SW 6075
Garret Gray
E. Entry Door: Therma Tru
Doors - Rustic Clay
F. Siding: Hardie Plank Lap
Siding,The Statement
Collections, Arctic White
G. Siding: Hardie Plank Lap
Siding,The Statement
Collections, Night Gray
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A2.4BUILDING ELEVATION 6 PLEX

MODERN FARMHOUSE
9'-1"9'-1"
±30'-1"
Roof Plan
Scale:1/8"=1'-0"
RIDGE
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL

LEYVALLE
Y
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL
LEY
VALLEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VA

LLEYVALLEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE

VALLEY VALLEY
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL
LEY
VA
LLEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE
VAL
LEY
VA
LLEY
4:12
4:12
Material Legend

1. Asphalt Shingle Roof

2. Stucco

3. Trim

4. Sectional Garage Door

5. Entry Door

6. Light Fixture

7. Decorative Corbels

8. Board and Batten Siding

9. Recessed Window

10. Fiber Cement Panel

SW 9608 Habitat
F. Garage Door / Entry Door:

SW 7054 Oak Leaf Brown
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A2.5BUILDING ELEVATION 6 PLEX

CRAFTSMAN
First Floor
86'-4"
47'-0"
48'-0"
P1 P3P2P4
AC Condenser
11'-4" 27'-6"
26'-9" 6'-4 1/2"
22'-6" 21'-1" 31'-8" 6'-9" 3'-6"
1'-0"
10"
14'-10 1/2"
Utilities
Second Floor
85'-6"
49'-0"
50'-0"
Bldg Area
First Floor: 3,924 SQ. FT. Gross
Second floor 3,991 SQ. FT. Gross
Total: 7,900 SQ. FT. Gross
P4
22'-6" 21'-1" 24'-10 1/2" 13'-6 1/2"
1'-0" 11'-4" 27'-6"
1'-0"
50'-0"
3'-6"
85'-6"
22'-6" 19'-10" 11'-1" 10'-0" 1'-0"
P3
P3
P1
P1P2
P2
P4
7'-2" 1'-6"
21'-1"
7'-2"
0 4 8 16
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A3.0BUILDING PLAN 4 PLEX
First Floor
109'-0"
Second Floor
109'-0"
48'-0"50'-0"
Bldg Area
First Floor: 5,026 SQ. FT. Gross
Second Floor: 5,131 SQ. FT. Gross
Total: 10,113 SQ. FT. Gross
P1
P3
P2P4P4
P1
P3
P2P4P4
P1
P3
P2P4P4
AC Condenser
22'-8" 21'-1" 24'-10 1/2" 13'-6 1/2" 3'-6"
45'-2" 21'-1" 31'-8" 3'-6"
6'-4 1/2"26'-9"
1'-0" 11'-4" 27'-6" 8'-2"
49'-0"
1'-0" 11'-4" 27'-6"
47'-0"
22'-6" 21'-1" 19'-10" 11'-1" 11'-0"22'-8"
50'-0" 0"
10"
14'-10 1/2"
Utilities
6'-9"
1'-0"
10" 22'-6"
7'-2"
0 4 8 16
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A3.1BUILDING PLAN 5 PLEX
First Floor
125'-10"
Second Floor
125'-10"
47'-0"
Bldg Area
First Floor: 5,699 SQ. FT. Gross
Second Floor: 5,819 SQ. FT. Gross
Total: 11,499 SQ. FT. Gross
P1
P3
P2
P1
P3
P2
P1
P3
P2
AC Condenser
11'-10 1/2" 42'-0" 26'-6 1/2" 11'-10 1/2" 3'-6"
38'-5" 42'-0" 31'-8" 3'-6"
1'-0" 11'-4" 27'-6" 8'-2"
49'-0"
1'-0" 11'-4" 27'-6"
47'-0"
42'-0" 19'-10" 11'-1" 11'-0"
3'-6"
34'-8"
6'-9"
1'-0"
3'-6" 26'-6 1/2"
P1
P3
P2
P1
P3
P2
1'-0" 11'-4"1'-0"
11'-4" 27'-6"
8'-2"
49'-0"
19'-10"11'-1"11'-0"
1'-0"
P1
P3
P2
7'-2"
0 4 8 16
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A3.2BUILDING PLAN 6 PLEX
19'-10 33/256"
49'-0"
Plan 1
2 Bed, 2.5 Bath
1,164 S.F. Net
1,281 S.F. Gross
Great Room
15'-5"x18'-11"
276 SQ. FT.

Bed 2
10'-9"x11'-11"
125 SQ. FT.

Primary
Bed
10'-5"x12'-7"
131 SQ. FT.

Kitchen
Dn
Primary
Bath
W.I.C.

Lau.

Coat
20'-9"
Up
47'-0"
Entry
Bath 2
Garage
20'-2"x20'-4"
410 SQ. FT.

Second Floor
787 SQ. FT. Net
First Floor
377 SQ. FT. Net
W.I.C.
16'-0"16'-0"
Pwdr.
871 SQ. FT. Gross 401 SQ. FT. Gross
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A5.0UNIT PLAN 1
Plan 2
3 Bed, 2.5 Bath
1,386 S.F. Net
1,455 S.F. Gross
20'-9"
46'-0"
Great Room
16'-7"x15'-2"
Kitchen
Up
Pwdr.

First Floor
482 SQ. FT. Net
Garage
20'-3"x20'-4"
412 SQ. FT.
20'-9"
47'-0"
Dn
Primary
Bed
13'-11"x12'-5"
Bed 2
9'-11"x11'-8"
Bed 3
10'-0"x11'-8"
W.I.C.

Bath 2
Lau.

Lin.

Second Floor
904 SQ. FT. Net
Lin.

Coat
Primary
Bath
932 SQ. FT. Gross 523 SQ. FT. Gross
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A5.1UNIT PLAN 2
Plan 3
3 Bed, 2.5 Bath
1,496 S.F. Net
1,551 S.F. Gross
25'-9"
Dn
Bed 2
11'-1"x11'-0"
122 SQ. FT.

Bed 3
10'-11"x11'-1"
121 SQ. FT.

Primary
Bed
14'-6"x13'-4"
193 SQ. FT.

Bath 2
Lin.

W.I.C.

Second Floor
923 SQ. FT. Net
25'-9"
47'-0"
Kitchen
Great Room
15'-9"x24'-8"
322 SQ. FT.

Up
Lau.

Pwdr.

Coat
Garage
21'-4"x20'-4"
427 SQ. FT.

First Floor
580 SQ. FT.Net
48'-0"
Primary
Bath
954 SQ. FT. Gross 605 SQ. FT. Gross
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A5.2UNIT PLAN 3
Plan 4
3 Bed, 2.5 Bath
1,609 S.F. Net
1,675 S.F. Gross
22'-6"
50'-0"
Dn
Bed 2
10'-9"x13'-5"
144 SQ. FT.

Bed 3
10'-11"x11'-11"
129 SQ. FT.

Primary
Bed
11'-11"x14'-6"
173 SQ. FT.

W.I.C.

Bath
Lau.

Lin.
22'-8"
48'-0"
Garage
21'-11"x20'-4"
446 SQ. FT.

Kitchen
Great Room
21'-11"x13'-7"
292 SQ. FT.

Up
Second Floor
1028 SQ. FT. Net
First Floor
580 SQ. FT. Net
Pwdr.

Coat
Primary
Bath
1061 SQ. FT. Gross 606 SQ. FT. Gross
0 2 4 8
Architecture + Planning
888.456.5849
ktgy.com

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
AUGUST 4, 2022JARUPA VALLEY, CA # 200770
PARADISE KNOLLS PA2 - TOWNHOUSESCentury Communities
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 300
Newport Beach, CA 92660 A5.3UNIT PLAN 4

LOT 7 - TRASH ENCLOSURE EXHIBIT
TTM 38257
PREPARED ON: 8/8/2022

TYPICAL TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL
N.T.S.

Page | 1
120
S

TAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: KEITH CLARKE, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.B
PUBL

IC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES AND THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
RECO

MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council open the public hearing, receive public comment and close the public hearing.
2) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-108, entitled:

A RE

SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AS ADOPTED BY

THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY

BECAUSE OF LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL

CONDITIONS
3) That
the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022- 18, entitled:

AN O

RDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 8.05, ADOPTION OF CONSTRUCTION CODES, TO TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE (1) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, (2) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE, (3) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, (4) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, (5) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, (6) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, (7) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, (8) THE

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, (9) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCE STANDARDS CODE, (10) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, (11) THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND
DELETIONS TO SUCH CODES AND AMENDING CHAPTER 8.10, ADOPTION OF FIRE CODES, TO TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA

FIRE CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS

TO SUCH CODE

DISCUSSION

Building Codes

The California Building Standards Commission recently adopted the 2022 Edition of the California Building Codes, which is also known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 (California Code of Regulations, Title 24). The 2022 California Building Codes include the California Building Code, the California Historical Building Code, the California Existing Building Code the California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, the California Electrical Code, the California Energy Code, the California Green Building Code, the California Reference Standards Code, the California Residential Code and the International Property Maintenance Code. The accompanying ordinance will adopt these Building Codes and bring the City's building regulations into compliance with the latest codes adopted by the California Building Standards Commission. The 2019 State Building Codes have been in effect in the City since January 1, 2020 and will be superseded by these new 2022 State Building Codes.

Under State statute, specific referenced model codes must be adopted by the local jurisdictions within 180 days of the publication date of the model codes. The effective date for local enforcement of the new California Building Codes will be January 1, 2023.

Additionally, any modifications made by local agencies to the technical regulations adopted by the California Building Standards Commission may only become effective if the local jurisdiction makes express findings of needs for changes due to local conditions.

Further, these modifications must be directly related to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions i n the form of a Resolution and must be filed directly with the Building Standards Commission after its adoption.

published by NFPA, the 2021 edition of the International Reference Standards Code published by ICC, the 2021 edition of the International Residential Code published by ICC and the 2021 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code published by ICC.

It should be noted that the amendments to the administrative provisions and regulations, addressing elements of construction that are not regulated by the California Building Standards Commission, do not need to meet the test of being necessary due to climatic, geological or topographical conditions.

No new fees or changes to the current building permit fee structures are proposed as part of this building code adoption process. The City adopted the Riverside County building permit fee resolution upon incorporation.

Fire Code

A new California Fire Code has been adopted by the State Building Standards Commission, which will become effective January 1, 2023. State law allows local governments to amend California Codes, provided that the amendments are more restrictive and are necessary in order to provide a higher level of safety. The proposed ordinance will adopt and am end the 2022 edition of the California Fire Code, which is based on the 2021 International Fire Code (IFC).

Procedures

To accomplish the adoption by reference of the California Building Standards Codes, the first reading of Ordinance No. 2022- 18 is required and took place on October 20, 2022.

Then a public hearing on the matter is scheduled for November 17, 2022. A notice of public has been published twice prior to this hearing date.

The adoption of proposed Ordinance No. 2022-18 will adopt the 2022 California Building Standards Codes, as amended by the City, and bring the City's building regulations into compliance with the latest codes adopted by the California Building Standards Commission.

If the Council adopts Ordinance No. 2022- 18 on November 17, 2022, Ordinance No. 2022- 18 will take effect on January 1, 2023. As mentioned above, the State Building Codes will automatically take effect in the City on January 1, 2023.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

None. The proposed ordinance adopts the new Building Codes and Fire Code.

-1-

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-108

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE 2022 CALIFORNIA

FIRE CODE, AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, ARE

REASONABLY NECESSARY BECAUSE OF LOCAL CLIMATIC,

GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City o f Jurupa Valley hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. Certain model and uniform codes, located within Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and including building standards therein, are adopted and amended by the State of California in the 2022 California Building Standards Code and, on January 1, 2023, will become applicable in the City, subject to amendments made by the City pursuant to state law.

B. Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.5 and 18941.5 permit local amendments to building standards adopted by the State, based upon express findings that such amendments are reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological and/or topographical conditions.

Section 2. The facts set forth in Section 1 of this Resolution, are true and correct.

Section 3. None of the proposed amendments to the 2022 California Building Code are building standards requiring findings, and are instead administrative in nature. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley desires to modify certain building standards in the 2022 California Fire Code, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley. As required by law, the City Council hereby expressly finds, determines and declares as follows:

I. Climatic Conditions:

A. The City of Jurupa Valley located in Riverside County is located in Southern California and covers a vast and varied geographic area. The base climate in western Riverside County consists of semi arid Mediterranean weather patterns. Eastern Riverside Coun ty is a desert area with Mohave Desert temperatures and weather patterns. Those two primary areas are divided by the San Bernardino Mountain Range. Both areas outside of the mountain terrain annually experience extended periods of high temperatures with li ttle or no precipitation. Hot, dry winds, which may reach speeds of 70 M.P.H. or greater, are common to the area. Examples are: Santa Ana/ Foehn winds, afternoon surface -heating generated winds, and prevailing desert winds.

These climatic conditions cause extreme drying of vegetation and common building materials. Frequent periods of drought and low humidity add to the fire danger. This predisposes -2-

the area to large destructive fires (conflagration) which necessitates rapid identification, locating and extinguishment of all fires in the smallest stage possible. In addition to directly damaging or destroying buildings, these fires are also prone to disrupt utility services throughout the County.

Obstacles generated by a strong wind, such as fallen trees, str eet lights and utility poles, will greatly impact the response time to reach an incident scene. During these winds, the inability to use aerial type firefighting apparatus would further decrease our ability to stop fires in large buildings and place rescue personnel at increased risk of injury.

B. Although Riverside County occasionally experiences periods of significant drought, the County can also experience periods of substantial rainfall. Annual rainfall varying from three (3) inches in Blythe to over t hirty three (33) inches in Pine Cove. When Riverside County does experience heavy rain, or rain over a period of days or weeks, many areas of the County are subject to flooding. Runoff from rain drains either naturally into rivers, washes, and creeks or into flood control facilities. Flash flooding is also a common problem, especially in the Coachella Valley and the easterly portions of the county. Flash flooding is typically associated with short duration, high intensity precipitation events often associat ed with summer thunderstorms. Such events can occur even during a drought.

C. Water demand in densely populated Southern California far exceeds the quantity supplied by natural precipitation; and although the population continues to grow, the already- taxed water supply does not. California is projected to increase in population by nearly 10 million over the next quarter of a century with 50 percent of that growth centered in Southern California.

Due to storage capacities and consumption, and a limited amount of rainfall future water allocation is not fully dependable. This necessitates the need for additional and on -site fire protection features. It would also leave tall buildings vulnerable to uncontrolled fires due to a lack of available water and an inability to pump sufficient quantities of available water to floors in a fire.

D. These dry climatic conditions and winds contribute to the rapid spread of even small fires originating in high-density housing or vegetation. These fires spread ver y quickly and create a need for increased levels of fire protection. The added protection of fire sprinkler systems and other fire protection features such as identification and notification will supplement normal fire department response by providing imme diate protection for the building occupants and by containing and controlling the fire spread to the area of origin. Fire sprinkler systems will also reduce the use of water for firefighting by as much as 50 to 75 percent.

II. Topographical conditions

A. Natural: The topographical conditions of Riverside County vary from three hundred (300) feet below sea -level, flat desert communities, to mountains over ten thousand (10,000) feet in Alpine-like areas of the San Bernardino Mountain Range. In between these areas, developable slopes of 25 percent and greater generally occur throughout the foothills. Riverside County extends from Orange County to the State of Arizona and is mixed with congested urban areas, rural lands and wild lands. A large number of sensit ive habitats for various animal species and vegetation consist within large open space areas between major urban centers that impact building and structure location, which impedes emergency access and response. This variety in -3-

regions contributes to an inc reased emergency response time, which necessitates cooperation between local agencies.

B. Traffic and circulation congestion is an artificially created, obstructive topographical condition, which is common throughout Riverside County.

C. These topographi cal conditions combine to create a situation, which places fire department response time to fire occurrences at risk, and makes it necessary to provide automatic on-site fire -extinguishing systems and other protection measures to protect occupants and property.

III. Geological Conditions

Located within Riverside County are several known active and potentially active earthquake faults, including the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and Elsinore Fault. In the event of an earthquake, the location of the epicenter a s well as the time of day and season of the year would have a profound effect on the number of deaths and casualties, as well as property damage.

The major form of direct damage from most earthquakes is damage to construction.

Bridges are particularly vul nerable to collapse, and dam failure may generate major downstream flooding. Buildings vary in susceptibility, dependent upon construction and the types of soils on which they are built. Earthquakes destroy power and telephone lines; gas, sewer, or water m ains; which, in tum, may set off fires and/or hinder firefighting or rescue efforts. The hazard of earthquakes varies from place to place, dependent upon the regional and local geology. Ground shaking may occur in areas 65 miles or more from the epicenter (the point on the ground surface above the focus). Ground shaking can change the mechanical properties of some fine grained, saturated soils, where upon they liquefy and act as a fluid (liquefaction).

A. Previous earthquakes in southern California have be en accompanied by disruption of traffic flow and fires. A severe seismic event has the potential to negatively impact any rescue or fire suppression activities because it is likely to create obstacles similar to those indicated under the high wind section above. With the probability of strong aftershocks there exists a need to provide increased protection for anyone on upper floors of buildings.

B. Road circulation features located throughout the County also make amendments reasonably necessary. Located through the County are major roadways, highways and flood control channels that create barriers and slow response times. Hills, slopes, street and storm drain design accompanied with occasional heavy rainfall, cause roadway flooding and landslides and at times may make an emergency access route impassable. There are areas in Riverside County that naturally have extended emergency response times that exceed the 5 -minute goal.

California Health and Safety Code Sections 17958.7 and 18941.5 require that the modification or change be expressly marked and identified as to which each finding refers.

Therefore, the Board of Supervisors finds that the following table sets forth the 2022 California Fire Code sections that have been modified and the associated local c limatic, geological and/or topographical conditions described above supporting the modification. -4-

2022 CODE SECTION TITLE/SUBJECT FINDINGS I, II, III
101.4 Severability Administrative
102.5 Application of residential code I, II & III
104.1.1 Authority of the Fire Chief and Fire Department Administrative 104.7 and 104.7.1 Liability Administrative
104.13 Authority of the Fire Chief to close hazardous fire areas Administrative 107.2 Schedule of permit fees Administrative
107.7 Cost Recovery Administrative
111.1 Board of Appeals established Administrative
112.4 Violation and Penalties Administrative
202 Fire Chief Administrative
308.1.6.3 Sky Lanterns or similar devices I, II & III
503.2.1 Dimensions Administrative
503.2.2 Authority Administrative
503.6.1 Automatic opener Administrative
503.7 Loading areas and passenger drop-off areas Administrative 507.5.7 Fire hydrant size and outlets I & III
507.5.8 Fire hydrant street marker I, II & III
508.1, 508.1.1, 508.1.3 Fire command center I, II & III 509.2.1 Minimum clearances I & III
608.11.1.2 Manual operation II & III
903.2 Where required (automatic sprinkler systems) I, II & III 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems I & II
3204.2.1 Minimum requirements for client leased or occupant owned warehouses Administrative
4904.2.1 High Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps Administrative App Ch B, Table B105.2 Fire-Flow - Buildings other than one- or two-family dwellings I, II & III App Ch C, C103.1 Hydrant spacing I, II & III

Section 4. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. T he City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that nay one or more sections, subsections, subdivision, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.

Section 5. The City Clerk shall, and is hereby directed to, file a copy of this Resolution, together with a copy of Ordinance No. 2022-108 with the State Building Standards Commission, as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7.

Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 17th day of November, 2022.

-5-

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-6-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-108 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 17th day of November, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 17th day of November, 2022.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

-7-
Attachment A
Local Amendment Justification/Statement of Reason

Building Standards Law allows local amendments in accordance with the following:

For purposes of this subdivision, a city or county may make reasonably necessary modifications to the requirements, adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17958, 17958.5, 17958.7, and 18941.5, contained in the provisions of the code and regulations on the basis of local conditions.

Chapter 1 - Scope and Administration:

Section 101.4: This section is carried over from the existing Ordinance No. 2016 -15 this section resolves any conflict with the fire code provisions. Riverside County maintains its own severability clause and does not adopt the fire code text.

Section 102.5: This section is carried over from the existing Ordinance No. 2016-15 the scope and application of the fire code needs to be expanded to apply to the fire sprinkler systems for accessory structures constructed under the 2019 California Residential Code (CRC) which are now permitted to exceed 3,000 square feet in area. This existing modification maintains the applicability of the 2019 California Fire Code (CFC) Section 903.2 amendment to those accessory structures greater than or equal to 3,600 square feet in area. This has no change in intent for Ordinance No. 2016-15 and maintains the protection offered.

Section 103.4: This section is carried over from the existing Ordinance No. 2016-15 to resolve any conflict between state law and the fire code provisions.

Section 104.1.1: This section is carried over from the existing Ordinance No. 2016-15. It is imperative that enforcement capability be disseminated to other law enforcement entities within the Riverside County area because of its vast topography and diversity. This gives the Riverside County Fire Department greater enforcement capabilities due to the presence of these other agencies across the County of Riverside.

Section 104.12: This section is carried over from the existing Ordinance No. 2016-15 and grants authority to the Fire Chief, in cooperation with the Board of Supervisors, to close hazardous fire areas.

Section 106.2: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15 and relocated to the fees section of the fire code section 106.2. This amendment is necessary to identify that fees are in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance 671.

Section 106.6: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15 and relocated to the fees section of the fire code. This section is maintained in accordance with Health and Safety Code 13009 and 13009.1, and Government Code 53150, et seq. for cost recovery.

Section 109.1: This section is carried over from the existing Ordinance No. 2016-15 to identify

-8-
the board of appeals and additional criteria for clarification and implementation. The existing modifications to this section are consistent with Health and Safety Code 17920.5 where no board of appeals exists. This section provides for the ability to create a Board of Appeals as needed.

Section 110.4: This section is carried over from the existing Ordinance No. 2016-15 section 109.4 and relocated to this section to resolve any conflict with the fire code provisions.

Ordinance No. 2016-15 requires punishments and penalties for violations to be in accordance with Ordinance No. 725 and Health and Safety Code Sections 17995 through 17995.5.

Chapter 2 - Definitions:

Fire Chief: This definition is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This definition was added to designate that this term means the Fire Chief of Riverside County whenever the wording appears in the California Fire Code or this Ordinance. This is to distinguish obligato ry authority to the Fire Chief or any of the designated representatives for fire prevention measures and declarations in enforcing this Ordinance.

Chapter 3 General Requirements

Section 308.1.6.3: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2013-13. This section is amended to prohibit sky lanterns and similar devices. The California State Fire Marshal's office issued Information Bulletin 12 -005 indicating that there is a serious fire and safety hazard associated with sky lanterns, which i nclude the potential to start an unintended fire on or off the property from which they are released. They are known to travel significant distances from the point of release. The National Association of State Fire Marshals Resolution 2013-3 recommends imposing State level bans on their sale and use. Multiple fires have been reported to be linked to the use of sky lanterns including, but not limited to, a recycling plant fire in Smethwick, England which caused approx. $9M in damage and a wildfire in Shell Beach on the mountain above Pirates Code in San Luis Obispo County, CA. This is similar to the existing amendment by Orange County Fire Authority.

Chapter 5 - Fire Service Features

Section 503.2.1: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This correlation of the fire code is necessary for minimum fire apparatus access widths for firefighter operations and consistency throughout the county. This modification does not supersede County road standards contained in Ord 460 or Ord 461 where Ord 460 or Ord 461 is more restrictive. This modification has no change in regulatory effect.

Section 503.2.2 : This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016 -15. This section is enhanced to specify who has authority to designate Fire Lanes/Fire Apparatus Access Roads and modify minimum widths.

Section 503.6.1: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This section provides fire department and other emergency responders more rapid access to facilities with

-9-
motorized gates. Underwriters Laboratory (UL) "determined that fires today are more dangerous and pose more risks than in the past. Fire propagation is faster, and time to flashover, escape times and collapse times are all shorter" (UL Fire Safety Journal Issue 1). Placing our first responders on scene sooner or without disruption will provide for greater occupant and firefighter safety, and assist in property protection and medical emergencies.

Section 503.7: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This section provides additional width for apparatus access roads where utilized for loading/unloading or passenger drop off/pick up to prevent interference with operational access needs.

Section 507.5.7 : This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016 -15. This section provides for the siz e and quantities of outlets for residential standard, super hydrant standard, and super hydrant enhanced fire hydrants and that they shall be required as determined by the Fire Code Official.

Section 507.5.8: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. The section provides direct reference to Riverside County Fire Department Technical Policy 06-11 for specific requirements for the installation of blue reflective markers for fire hydrants.

Section 508.1, 508.1.3, and 508.1.6: These sections are carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. These sections have been amended to require fire command centers for structures larger than 300,000 square feet in size. To put into context, the Fire Command Center would be triggered when the buildings are approximately 2.5 times the typical Costco Warehouse store and approximately two times the size of a typical Walmart Supercenter. Large structures of this size pose numerous challenges to emergency responders due to the large amounts of fuel loads from the storage, manufacturing and/or processing of flammable/combustible commodities and other processes within the building. Challenges include wide distribution of smoke throughout the structure, difficulty for firefighters to locate and reach the fire and difficulty in search and evacuation of the public, employees and firefighters. These structures typically require numerous fire protection, early suppression and detection systems that may include, but are not limited to, fire pumps, multiple fire sprinkler systems, advanced fire alarm systems, smoke control systems, and refrigeration gas detection system(s). During a fire, the incident commander must have the ability to readily identify the status of the various suppression and detection systems and have access to other building information details that may include, but are not limited to, building floor plans, high pile/rack storage details, smoke control/ventilation systems, fire sprinkler zoning details, mechanical refrigeration equipment and piping details, and hazardous materials data sheets along with quantities and storage/use locations. A fire command center provides a centralized location for the incident commander to review details about the building and the incident and to effectively coordinate emergency responders and suppression activities with increased efficiency and speed.

The Riverside County Fire Department has experienced several incidents in buildings with and without Fire Command Centers. Incident Commanders found that having detailed information on built in fire protection systems and controls, building schematics and hazardous materials storage plans were vital towards mitigating the event. When this information was not available, firefighting personnel were forced to operate upon assumptions and much less information. In addition, this increased efficiency and speed results in facilities returning to operation more expeditiously after incidents or false alarms thereby reducing loss of revenue for the business.

-10-
Section 508.1.1 and 508.1.8: These sections are carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15 to identify the approved location of the fire command center and to indicate signage requirements for the entrance door.

Section 509.2.1: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This section encompasses other exterior fire protection water supply appliances such as Fire Department connections, and other exterior fire protection system control valves, or any other exterior fire protection system component that may require immediate access.

Section 605.10.1.2: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016 -15. This section specifies the location of manual crossover valves when manual operation is required by the Fire Code Official. The amendment specifies that the manual valves shall be located in an approved location immediately outside of the machinery room, in a secure metal box or equivalent and marked as Emergency Controls. This is to ensure that the valves are in readily accessible location(s) for access during an emergency.

Section 903.2 : This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2013.13 with modification. Modifications have been made to provide certain exemptions including, but not limited to, agricultural and greenhouse Group U structures constructed in accordance with the California Building Code and specific shade structures.

The existing amendment provides a base square footage requirement for all new commercial, industrial, and residential occupancies other than one- and two-family dwellings. Though the amendment includes a reference to the requirement for one- and two-family dwellings, the authority for residential fire sprinkler requirements resides in Title 24, Part 2.5 (2019 California Residential Code].

Automatic sprinkler systems have been successfully used to protect industrial and commercial buildings and their occupants for more than 100 years. Historically the place which has offered the least amount of fire protection to occupants was and still is their own home. This was brought to light in 1973 by the Report of the National Commission on Fire Prevention and Control, America Burning. At the time of the report approximately 8,000 people died in structure fires every year in the United States. Nine out of ten of those victims died in their home.

However, the U.S. Fire Administration report "Fire in the United States 2004-2013 17th edition" reflects that nonresidential fire losses are costly. "National estimates of nonresidential building fires and losses, from 2004 to 2013, annually accounted for only 7 percent of fires, 2 percent of deaths, and 8 percent of injuries. These properties, however, accounted for a disproportionately large annual dollar loss, 21 percent. Trends in nonresidential buildings showed a 14 percent decrease in fires, a 9 percent increase in deaths, a 7 percent increase in injuries, and a 10 percent decrease in dollar loss from 2004 to 2013."

The same report concluded "... that, overall, the fire problem in the U.S. continues to improve.

Ten-year fire loss rates are down. It is likely that several factors continue to contribute to these trends:... " which includes; "fire sprinklers, which quickly combat incipient fires, especially in nonresidential and multifamily buildings, and fire codes, which have been strengthened." Furthermore, the report reflects that The nonresidential building category includes industrial and commercial properties, institutions (such as hospitals, nursing homes and prisons),

-11-
educational establishments (from preschool through university), mobile properties, and storage properties. On average, about 89 percent of nonresidential structure fires, 88 percent of deaths, 91 percent of injuries, and 92 percent of dollar losses reported to National Fire Incident Reporting System from 2004 to 2013 occurred in nonresidential buildings.

Aside from firefighter and explosion fatalities, there has never been a multiple loss of life in a fully sprinklered building due to fire or smoke. All fire protection features have a reliability factor. Walls and shafts can be breached by means of poke-throughs and building alterations. Exit doors can be blocked or locked.

The California Residential Code is requiring that all one and two family dwellings be protected by sprinklers. It is still imperative, based on the geographical, topographical, climatic diversity of Riverside County, to continue to protect all structures greater than 3,600 sq. ft. by Fire Sprinklers, to ensure faster suppression to those occupancies that would not normally be required to be protected which would exhaust a number resources including water which climatically is so precious to our environment as a whole. It will provide for less run off into ground water due to suppression activities and less pollutants into the environment.

Mobile homes are a part of the American landscape. In 2007 alone, more than 95,000 manufactured homes were shipped nat ionwide. Manufactured housing also accounts for approximately 10 percent of the single-family structures in the United States. Despite the fact that we drive by them, respond to medical calls in them, and sometimes live in them, we often overlook mobile homes when it comes to training and prefire planning. However, as the deaths of two firefighters in Craigsville, West Virginia, showed, mobile homes can pose significant, and sometimes deadly, challenges. The burning mobile home is a less -than-stable platform, making search and possible rescue of occupants even more dangerous. The exterior walls are not as structurally sound when compared with those of most site-built homes. The narrow halls complicate search. If the first-due engine pulls up and the mobile home is burning from end to end, the firefighting strategy has already been decided. The fire must be knocked down in order to move in. If the home is in a mobile home park, again, protecting exposures is vital. Radiant heat can ignite the homes nearby.

Fire sprinklers can prevent the flashover from occurring and in many cases put the fire out and save valuable resources in the process, such as water, personnel, and environmental cleanup, limited displacement into County shelter(s), and less inconvenience to the family. The mobile home, because of its construction, requires fast water.

The National Fire Protection Association reports in 2007-2011, 11,400 structure fires per year were reported in manufactured homes, with associated losses of; 206 civilian deaths, 434 civilian injuries, and $179 million in direct damage per year nationally. The roof, for example, burns through more quickly than a typical residential roof and is not safe for firefighters. Mobile home fires can quickly grow out of control, because there's not as much wallboard and drywall, and there are fewer walls to keep the fire from spreading.

The record for automatic fire sprinklers is based on the simple fact that there has never been a multiple death of building occupants from a fire developing in a building protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system properly installed and maintained in accordance with nationally recognized standards (NFPA 13, 130, 13R, and NFPA 25).

-12-
AWWA Research Foundation has pub lished the following report: Impact of Fire Flow on Distribution System Water Quality, Design, and Operation. This report concludes the following:

"Water-efficient fire suppression technologies exist that use less water than conventional standards.

In particular, the universal application of automatic sprinkler systems provides the most proven method for reducing loss of life and property due to fire, while at the same time providing faster response to the fire and requiring significantly less water than conventional fire-fighting techniques.

It is recommended that the universal application of automatic fire sprinklers be adopted by local jurisdictions."

Consider the benefits: a single firefighter using a normal 1-1/2" fire hose can be applying between 175- 400 gallons of water per minute when attempting to extinguish a fire. On the other hand, a single fire sprinkler will be flowing only 18- to 40- gallons of water per minute. This means that over a 5-minute period, the following quantities of water are used:

Fire-fighter with 1-1/2" hose:
175 gpm x 5 minutes = 875
gallons of water 400 gpm x 5
minutes= 2,000 gallons of water
Fire sprinkler system:
18 gpm x 5 minutes= 90 gallons
of water 40 gpm x 5 minutes =
200 gallons of water

Section 903.3.5.3: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. The section limits all hydraulically calculated fire sprinkler systems to not exceed 90% of the water supply capacity. The 10% buffer in the hydraulic calculation is a common engineering business practice that gives some flexibility to account for system water pressures that may decrease as additional demands are placed on the water system from additional construction or as the system ages.

Section 3204.2.1 : This section is ca rried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016 -15. By requiring client leased or occupant owned warehouses to have a technical report completed by a fire protection engineer, it will minimize problems concerning commodity and sprinkler protection. By having an engineer complete a technical report for the proposed or existing building it will provide greater certainty that adequate protection for the commodities that are proposed will be sufficient.

By not having adequate sprinkler protection, it could be detrimental to the building and could also cause loss of life in the event of a fire. Geographically this can be a significant problem due to the seismic activity that Riverside County experiences. The Engineer can assess the adequate protection for the correct commodity classifications, ensure the correct seismic provisions are in place for the type of system to be installed, and provide a professional assurance to a very volatile type of occupancy. It takes a vast number of resources to extinguish a fi re of this type. By adding this requirement, it will ensure an added level of safety. Modifications have been made to provide clarification that certain reference documents are not required.

Section 4904.3: This section is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This section is required under State Law, Section 51178.5. The date of the State adopted and recommended Very

-13-
High Fire Hazard Severity Zone map has been modified.

Table B105.2 of Appendix B : This amendment is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This allows the fire department to still have adequate fire flow mitigation with sprinkler protection and not jeopardize main distribution systems by inadequately under sizing them and have costly upgrades for future projects . With the geographical diversity that the County has it is important that this requirement be added to ensure adequate water in the event of a fire.

Section C103.1 of Appendix C : This provision is carried over from the previous Ordinance No. 2016-15. This provision is to clarify the additional location of fire hydrants to be at intersections.

This requirement has been standard policy within Riverside County. -1-

ORDINANCE NO. 2022-18

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA V ALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.05, ADOPTION OF CONSTRUCTION CODES,
TO TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA V ALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE (1) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING
CODE, (2) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE, (3) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, (4) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, (5) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA
PLUMBING CODE, (6) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, (7) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, (8) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, (9) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA
REFERENCE STANDARDS CODE, (10) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA
RESIDENTIAL CODE, (11) THE 2021 EDITION OF THE

INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, TOGETHER
WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS TO SUCH CODES;
AND AMENDING CHAPTER 8.10, ADOPTION OF FIRE CODE, OF TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA V ALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE THE 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, TOGETHER WITH

CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS TO SUCH CODE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA V ALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows:
(a) Government Code Section 50022.1 et seq. authorizes the adoption by reference of the 2022 California Building Standards Codes, including the 2022 California Fire Code specified in this Ordinance.
(b) A duly noticed public hearing, as required by Government Code Section 50022.3, was held by the City Council on November 17, 2022, at which time the City Council heard and considered all public comments on these codes prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (c) At least one copy of each code adopted by this Ordinance certified as full, true and correct by the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley have been filed in the Office of the City Clerk at le ast 15 days preceding the public hearing on November 17, 2022, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50022.6. (d) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred and been fulfilled.

Section 2. Section 8.05.010 (“Adoption of Construction Codes ”) of Chapter 8.05 (“Adoption of Construction Codes”) of Title 8 (“Buildings and Construction”) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 8.05.010. - Adoption of construction codes.

-2-

Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the City of Jurupa Valley adopts the following codes by reference as the “Construction Codes” of the City of Jurupa Valley:
(1) California Building Code, 2022 Edition, V olumes 1 and 2 (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Division II of Chapter 1 and Appendix I, but excluding Appendices A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, and O from adoption;
(2) California Historical Building Code, 2022 Edition (Part 8 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations);
(3) California Existing Building Code, 2022 Edition (Part 10 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), excluding Sections 103 through 115 from adoption;
(4) California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including the Tables and Annexes thereto, but excluding Annexes E, F, G, H, I and J from adoption;
(5) California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), excluding Sections 103 through 107 and excluding Appendices A, B, C, E, F, G, and H from adoption;
(6) California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition (Part 5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Appendices A, B, D, H, and I, but excluding Sections 103 through 107 and excluding Appendices C, E, F, G, J, K, L, M and N from adoption;
(7) California Energy Code, 2022 Edition (Part 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations);
(8) California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition (Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations);
(9) California Referenced Standards Code, 2022 Edition (Part 12 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations);
(10) California Residential Code, 2022 Edition (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Appendices AH and AJ, but excluding Sections R103 through R114 and excluding Appendices AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AG, AI, AK, AL, AM, AN, AO, AP, AQ, AR, AS, AT, AU, A V , AW, AX, AY and AZ from adoption; and
(11) International Property Maintenance Code, 2021 Edition, as published by the International Code Council.

A copy of each of the above referenced Construction Codes shall be maintained in the office of City Clerk and the Building Official, and shall be made available by the City -3-

Clerk for public inspection while such codes are in for ce. All fees set forth in the Construction Codes adopted by this chapter shall be established by resolution of the City Council or ordinances of the County of Riverside adopted by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.” Section 3. Section 8.05.020 (“California Building Code Amendments ”) of Chapter

8.05 (“Adoption of Construction Codes”) of Title 8 (“Buildings and Construction”) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 8.05.020. - California Building Code amendments.

The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, as adopted by this chapter:
(1) Division II of Chapter 1 of the 2022 California Building Code is hereby adopted as amended in Section 8.05.030.
(2) Includes the adoption of Appendix I.
(3) Appendices A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N and O are not adopted.”

Section 4. Section 8.05.030 (“Administrative Provisions for Title 8”) of Chapter 8.05 (“Adoption of Construction Codes”) of Title 8 (“Buildings and Construction”) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

“Sec. 8.05.030. - Administrative provisions for Title 8.

This chapter shall be cited as the Administrative Provisions to Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, and shall apply to all referenced and adopted codes in Title 8, including the Construction Codes, unless otherwise provided. Division II of Chapter 1 of the 2022 California Building Code is hereby adopted, subject to the particular additions, am endments, and deletions as set forth below.
(1) Amendment—Section 101.1—Title.

Section 101.1 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the Administrative Provisions to Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and shall apply to all of the referenced and adopted codes in Title 8, including the Construction Codes, unless otherwise provided.
(2) Amendment—Section 101.4—Referenced codes.

Section 101.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
-4-

101.4 Referenced codes. The other codes specified in sections 101.4.1 through 101.4.13 and referenced elsewhere in this code shall be considered part of the requirements of this code to the prescribed extent of each such reference.
101.4.1 The 2022 California Building Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.2 The 2022 California Green Building Standards Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.3 The 2021 International Property Maintenance Code as adopted and amended by Section 8.05.040.
101.4.4 The 2022 California Residential Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.5 The 2022 California Mechanical Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.6 The 2022 California Fire Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.10.
101.4.7 T he 2022 California Plumbing Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.8 The 2022 California Electrical Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.9 The 2022 California Energy Code as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.10 The 2022 C alifornia Existing Building Code, as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.12 The 2022 California Historical Building Code, as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
101.4.13 The 2022 California Reference Standards Code, as adopted and amended by Chapter 8.05.
(3) Section 103.1 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
103.1 Creation of enforcement agency. The Jurupa Valley Department of Building and Safety is hereby created and the official in charge thereof shall be known as the Building Official. The function of this Department shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
-5-

(4) Addition—Section 104.11.5 —Application for request to use alternative materials, design, or methods of construction and equipment.

Section 104.11.5 is hereby added to read as follows:
104.11.5 Application for request to use alternative materials, design, or methods of construction and equipment. Requests for the use of alternative materials, design, or methods of construction or equipment must be made in writing on the City of Jurupa Valley “Request to use Alternate Materials, Design and Methods ” application form and an application fee must be paid at the time of request submittal. Applications shall be specific to a project add ress and approval for a specific project shall not constitute approval for use at any other locations. (5) Addition—Section 105.1.3—Permits required.

Section 105.1.3 is hereby added to read as follows:
105.1.3 Permits required. No person, firm, or corporatio n shall erect, re- erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert, or demolish any building or other structure in the city, without obtaining a valid building permit prior to commencement of any work. A Building permit is also required for the following specified items:

1. Retaining walls over two feet in height (measured from the top of the footing) and walls of any height if supporting a surcharge or any superimposed load other than the natural fill of level earth.

Retaining walls are required for any unsupported excavation with vertical banks more than two feet high or unsupported excavations of any height if supporting a surcharge or any superimposed load other than the natural fill of level earth.

2. Fence or fences over three feet in height constructed or made of any material including, but not limited to, wood, plastic, metal, chain link, wrought iron, masonry, block, brick, or stone.

3. Any sign which requires a Planning Department sign permit as specified in the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, except signs painted directly onto an existing building, or sign structure or sign board, or the refacing of a previously approved sign canister with Plexiglas, flexible sign face, or similar material provided no structural changes are made to the sign structure or canister.

4. Accessory structures of any size when noncombustible materials or ignition-resistant materials are required in Section 710A of the 2022 CA Building Code or Section R337.10 of the 2022 CA Residential Code.
-6-

(6) Amendment—Section 105.2—Work exempt from permit.

Section 105.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Work Exempt from Permit. Exemptions from the permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. A building permit shall not be required for the following:

Building:

1. One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet. Accessory structures of any size when noncombustible materials or ignition -resistant materials are required in Section 710A of the 2022 CA Building Code or Section R337.10 of the 2022 CA Residential Code are not exempt from the permit requirements.

2. Fences not over three (3) feet high.

3. Oil derricks.

4. Retaining walls that are not over two (2) feet in height measured from the top of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or any superimposed load other than the natural fill of level earth or impounding Class I, II, or IIIA liquids.

5. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1.

6. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route.

7. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops, and similar finish work.

8. Temporary motion picture, television, and theater stage sets and scenery.

9. Prefabricated swimming pool accessory to a Group R -3 Occupancy that are less than 24 inches deep, do not exceed 5,000 gallons, and are installed entirely above ground.
-7-

10. Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes, not including service systems.

11. Swings and other playground equipment accessory to detached one- and two-family dwellings.

12. In Group R-3 and U occupancies, window a wnings that do not project more than 54 inches from the exterior wall, when supported by an exterior wall and do not require additional support.

13. Nonfixed and movable fixtures, cases, racks, counters, and partitions not over 5 feet 9 inches in height.

14. Residential decks not exceeding 200 square feet in area, with a walking surface that is not more than 30” above grade at any point, is not attached to a dwelling, and does not serve as a required path of egress or required path of accessibility. Decks located in a front yard setback will require approval from the Planning Department of the City of Jurupa Valley.

Electrical:

1. Repairs and maintenance: Minor repair work, including the replacement of lamps or the connection of approved portable electrical equipment to approved permanently installed receptacles.

2. Radio and television transmitting stations: The provisions of this code shall not apply to electrical equipment used for radio and television transmissions, but do apply to equipment and wiring for a power supply and the installations of towers and antennas.

3. Temporary testing systems: A permit shall not be required for the installation of any temporary system required for the testing or servicing of electrical equipment or apparatus. A tempora ry electrical service is not exempt from permit requirements.

Gas:

1. Portable heating appliances.

2. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe.

Mechanical:

1. Portable heating appliance.

2. Portable ventilation equipment.
-8-

3. Portable cooling unit.

4. Steam, hot, or chilled water piping within any heating or cooling equipment regulated by this code.

5. Replacement of any part that does not alter its approval or make it unsafe.

6. Portable evaporative cooler.

7. Self-contained refrigeration system containing 10 pounds or less of refrigerant and actuated by motors of 1 horsepower or less.

Plumbing:

1. The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste, or vent pipe, provided, however, that if any concealed trap, drain pipe, water, soil, waste, or vent pipe becomes defective and it becomes necessary to remove and replace the same with new material, such work shall be considered new work and a permit shall be obtained and inspection made as provided in this code.

2. The clearing of stoppages or the repairing of leaks in pipes, valves, or fixtures and the removal and reinstallation of water closets, provided such repairs do not involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves, pipes, or fixtures.

3. The installation of water -conserving plumbing fixtures in the same location as replacements for existing plumbing fixtures shall not require a permit or inspection from the Building Department.

The replacement plumbing fixtures shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 8.05 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

Grading:

1. Grading requirements and permits shall be as required by the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. Chapter 8.70
(7) Amendment—Section 105.3.2—Time limitation of application.

Section 105.3.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
105.3.2 Time limitation of application or plan check. An application for a permit or a plan check submittal for any proposed work shall be deemed to have been abandoned 180 days after the date of filing, unless such application has been pursued in good faith or a permit has been issued; except that the building official is authorized to grant one or more extensions of time, for additional periods not exceeding 90 days each. The -9-

extension shall be requested in writing and shall demonstrate justifiable cause for the requested extension. Extensions will not be approved until all applicable fees have been paid to the City Jurupa Valley. (8) Amendment—Section 105.5—Expiration.

Section 105.5 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
105.5 Expiration and Renewal. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work on the site authorized by such permit is commenced within 12 months after its issuance, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 12 months after the time the work is commenced. The building official is authorized to grant, in writing, one or more extensions of time, for periods not more than 180 days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and shall demonstrate justifiable cause for the requested extension. Extensions will not be approved until all applicable fees have been paid to the City of Jurupa Valley.

Renewal: Extensions will only be granted prior to the expirat ion of a permit. When a permit has expired, work cannot be recommenced prior to obtaining a new permit. Requests to renew an expired permit shall be submitted to the Building Official, in writing, demonstrating justifiable cause and subject to the approval of the Building Official. If approved by the Building Official the fee shall be one-half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that the suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. To renew a permit after more than a year of suspension or abandonment the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee. (9) Amendment—Section 105.6—Suspension or revocation.

Section 105.6 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
105.6 Suspension or revocation. The Building Official is authorized to suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this code whenever the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect, inaccurate or incomplete information, or is in violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this code. The Building Official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this code if construc tion noise is generated in violation of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 11.05
The Building Official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this code if dust is generated in excess of local, state or federal standards or conditions of project approval. -10-

(10) Amendment—Section 105.7—Placement of permit.

Section 105.7 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Section 105.7 Placement of permit. The required permits and approved plans shall be maintained in good condition and be posted or otherwise made available such as to allow the Building Official to conveniently make the required entries regarding the inspection of work. (11) Addition—Section 105.8—Transferability.

Section 105.8 is hereby added to read as follows:
105.8 Transferability. No permit issued pursuant to Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code shall be transferable to any other person or apply to any location other than that stated in the permit.
(12) Amendment—Section 109.2—Schedule of permit fees.

Section 109.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
109.2 Schedule of permit fees. On buildings, structures, electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing systems, or alterations requiring a permit, a fee for each permit shall be paid as required in ac cordance with the current fee schedule as adopted by ordinance or fee resolution of the City Council.

The Building Official shall apply the applicable fee from the fee schedule to the proposed project, including, where applicable, an hourly rate using the billable hourly rates established by the fee schedule. The Building Official shall have the final authority to establish the appropriate fee category for the project submitted.
(13) Amendment—Section 109.4—Work commencing before permit issuance.

Section 109.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
109.4 Investigation fee. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this code has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may b e issued for such work.

An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be determined by the currently adopted fee schedule and shall not be less than the actual costs as determined by the Building Official. (14) Amendment—Section 109.6—Refunds.

Section 109.6 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
-11-

109.6 Refunds. The Building Official may authorize refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected.

The Building Official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit inspection fee paid when no work has been started under a permit issued in accordance with this code.

The Building Official may author ize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee is paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is started.

The Building Official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on a written request for refund submitted by the original applicant or original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of the fee payment. (15) Addition—Sections 110.3.3.1—Roof sheathing and shear inspection.

Section 110.3.3.1 is hereby added read as follows:
110.3.3.1. Roof sheathing and shear inspection. Roof sheathing and shear inspections shall be performed after roof sheathing and all structural shear panels or walls are in place and secured by nailing or other approved methods.
(16) Addition—Sections 110.3.7.1—Plaster inspection.

Section 110.3.7.1 is hereby added to read as follows:
110.3.7.1. Plaster inspection. Plaster inspections shall be performed after the application of the scratch coat.
(17) Addition—Section 110.7—Re-inspections.

Section 110.7 is hereby added to read as follows:
110.7 Re -inspections. A re -inspection fee may be assessed for each inspection or re -inspection when such portion of work for which inspection is called is not complete or when corrections previously called for are not made. The amount of the fee shall be the minimum building inspection fee or as set forth in an established fee schedule.

This section is not to be interpreted as requiring re-inspection fees the first time a job is rejected for failure to com ply with the requirements of this code, but as controlling the practice of calling for inspections before the job is ready for such inspection or re-inspection.
-12-

Re-inspection fees may be assessed when the inspection record permit card is not posted or othe rwise available on the work site, the approved plans are not readily available for the City of Jurupa Valley building inspector, for failure to provide access on the date for which the inspection is requested, or for deviating from the plans requiring the approval of the Building Official.

To obtain a re-inspection, the applicant shall pay the re -inspection fee as set forth in the established fee schedule.

In instances where re -inspection fees have been assessed, no additional inspection of the work will be performed until the required fees have been paid.
(18) Amendment—Section 111.2—Certificate issued.

Section 111.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
111.2 Certificate issued. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until all applicable fees have been paid to the City of Jurupa Valley. After the Building Official inspects the building or structure and finds no violation of the provisions of this code or other laws that are enforced by the City of Jurupa Valley, the Building Official shall issue a Certificate of Occupancy that contains the following:

1. The building permit number.

2. The address of the structure.

3. The name and address of the owner.

4. A description of that portion of the structure for which the certificate is issued.

5. A statement that the described portion of the structure has been inspected for compliance with the requirements of this code for the occupancy and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified.

6. The name of the Building Official.

7. The edition of the code under which the permit was issued.

8. The use, occupancy group, and division, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the 2022 California Building Code.

9. The type of construction as defined in Chapter 6 of the 2022 California Building Code.
-13-

10. The design occupant load.

11. If an automatic fire sprinkler system is provided.

12. Any special stipulations and conditions of the building permit. (19) Addition—Section 112.3.1—Authority to disconnect service utilities.

Section 112.3.1 is hereby added to read as follows:
112.3.1 Authority to disconnect service utilities. The Building Official shall have the authority to order disconnection of utilities when a structure, building, or property is in violation of Section 111 or when the continued use of utilities creates or contributes to the existence of a “public nuisance ” as defined in this code or as determined by a court ordered action to abate such public nuisance.

When the Building Official has determined that approval for a temporary use of utilities or temporary occupancy per sections 108, 111, or 112 has terminated or violated the condition s of approval, the Building Official shall have the authority to order disconnection of utilities (20) Amendment—Section 114.4—Violation penalties.

Section 114.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
114.4 Violations, Penalties and Enforcement.

1. No person, firm, partnership, association or corporation shall violate any provisions of this chapter and any provisions o f the codes, rules or regulations adopted in Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

2. Any person, firm, partnership, association, or corporation violating any of the provisions adopted in Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code by reference, shall be guilty of an infraction, except where otherwise provided in this Title 8 or otherwise provided in the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. Any person violating a stop work order issued pursuant to section 115 of Division II of Chapter 1 of the 2022 California Building Code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any person who continues to occupy or any person who enters a structure which has been posted “unsafe” by the Building Official pursuant to section 116 of Division II of Chapter 1 of the 2022 California Building Code or Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to administrative penalties pursuant to Chapter 1.20 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
-14-

3. Every person, firm, association, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter or provisions of the codes, rules, or regulations adopted in this chapter by reference is guilty of a separate offense for each day or portion thereof during which the violation continues and shall be punisha ble thereof as provided in this code.

4. It is unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or joint venture, either as owner, architect, contractor, artisan, or otherwise, to do or to cause or permit to be done any work, as described in the California Building Standards Code as adopted by reference in Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, in such a manner that such work does not conform to all the provisions of Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and the provisions o f said California Building Standards Code, as so adopted by reference.

5. It is unlawful for any person to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, use, occupy, or maintain any building, structure, equipment, or portion thereof, in the city or cause the same to be done contrary to or in violation of any provision of this title or any provisions of the codes, rules, or regulations adopted in this title. No person shall violate any of the provisions or fail to comply with any of the requirements of th is title. Unless a different penalty is prescribed for violation of a specific provision of this title, any person violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with the requirements of this title is guilty of an infraction; provided, however, that any person who violates any of the provisions or fails to comply with any of the requirements of this title and has previously been convicted two or more times during any continuous 12 month period for any crime made punishable by this title shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to administrative penalties pursuant to Chapter 1.20 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

6. The Jurupa Valley Police Department (Riverside County Sheriff), the Fire Code Official, the Building Official, and the Code Enforcement Officer, of the City of Jurupa are authorized enforce the provisions of this title.

7. Violations of any of the provisions of Title 8 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code are also subject to any or a ll of the provisions of Title 1 Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.”
-15-

Section 5. Section 8.05.040 (“International Property Maintenance Code amendments”) of Chapter 8.05 (“Adoption of Construction Codes ”) of Title 8 (“Buildings and Construction”) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Sec. 8.05.040. - International Property Maintenance Code amendments.

The International Property Maintenance Code, 2021 Edition, is hereby adopted, subject to the particular additions, amendments, and deletions as set forth below.

CHAPTER I

SCOPE AND APPLICATION
SECTION 101 GENERAL
(1) Amendment—Section 101.1—Title.

Section 101.1 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
101.1. Title.

These regulations shall be known as the International Property Maintenance Code of Jurupa Valley, hereinafter referred to as “this code.” (2) Amendment—Section 102.3—Application of other codes
Section 102.3 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
102.3 Application of other codes. Repairs, additions or alterations to a structure or changes of occupancy classification, shal l be done in accordance with the procedures and provisions of the codes as adopted and amended in Chapter 8.05 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
(3) Amendment Section 102.8 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
102.8 Referenced codes and standards. The International codes referenced in this code shall mean the versions as adopted and amended in Chapter

8.05 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
(4) Amendment—Section 103 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
103.1 Administration, Enforcement, and Penalties.

Administration, enforcement, and penalties shall be as set forth in the Section 8.05.030 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

-16-

(5) Amendment—Section 302.4—Weeds.

Section 302.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
302.4 Weeds.

Premises and exterior property shall be maintained free from weeds or plant growth in excess of 4 inches in height. Noxious weeds shall be prohibited. Weeds shall be defined as all grasses, annual plants, vegetation, other than trees or shrubs provided; howeve r, this term shall not include cultivated flowers and gardens.”
Section 6. Chapter 8.10 ("Adoption of Fire Code") of Title 8 ("Buildings and Construction") of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

CHAPTER 8.10. - ADOPTION OF FIRE CODE
Sec. 8.10.010. - Fire Code adopted.

Except as stated in this Section or as amended below in Section 8.10.020, all of the provisions and appendices of the 2022 California Fire Code, inclusive of all of the inclusions and exclusions set for in each chapt er’s matrix, are hereby adopted and shall apply to the City of Jurupa Valley. In addition, the following provisions that are excluded in the 2022 California Fire Code are hereby adopted - Chapter 1, Division II of the California Fire Code is hereby adopte d, except that Section 103.2 and 111.3 are not adopted, and Chapters 3, 25, and Sections 403.11, 503, 510.2, 1103.2, and 5707 are adopted. The provisions of the 2019 California Fire Code and Appendices Chapter B, BB, C, CC, and H shall apply to all incorporated areas of the City by ratification. The California Fire Code shall be known as the Fire Code of the City of Jurupa Valley

Sec. 8.10.020. - Amendments to Fire Code.

The following amendments, additions, and deletions are made to the California Fire Code, 2019 Edition, as adopted by this chapter:

(1) Amendment-Section 101.4-Severability.

Section 101.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

101.4 Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this ordinance or the applica tion thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this ordinance, which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this ordi nance are hereby declared -17-

to be severable.

(2) Amendment-Section 102.5-Application of residential code.

Section 102.5 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

102.5 Application of residential code. Where structures are designed and constructed in accordance with the California Residential Code, the provisions of this code shall apply as follows:

1. Construction and design provisions of this code pertaining to the exterior of the structure shall apply including, but not limited to, premises ident ification, fire apparatus access and water supplies. Where interior or exterior systems or devices are installed, construction permits required by Section 105.6 of this code shall apply.

2. Administrative, operational and maintenance provisions of this code shall apply.

3. Automatic fire sprinkler system requirements of this code shall apply to detached accessory buildings 3,600 square feet or greater in accordance with Section 903.2. The provisions contained in Section 903.2.18 of the California Fire Code or Section R309.6 of the California Residential Code may be used for the design of the automatic fire sprinkler system for detached private garages.

(3) Addition-Section 104.1.1-Authority of the Fire Chief and Fire Department.

Section 104.1.1 is hereby added to read as follows:

104.1.1 Authority of the Fire Chief and Fire Department.

1. The Fire Chief is authorized and directed to enforce all applicable state fire laws and provisions of this
code and to perform such duties as directed by the
City Council.

2. The Fire Chief is authorized to administer, interpret, and enforce this code . Under the Fire Chief's
direction, the Riverside County Fire Department is
authorized to enforce ordinances of the City of
-18-

Jurupa Valley pertaining to the following:

2.1. The prevention of fires.

2.2. The suppression or extinguishment of
dangerous or hazardous fires.

2.3. The storage, use, and handling of hazardous
materials.

2.4. The installation and maintenance of automatic,
manual, and other private fire alarm systems and
fire extinguishing equipment.

2.5. The maintenance and regulation of fire escapes.

2.6. The maintenance of fire protection and the
elimination of fire hazards on land, in buildings,
structures, and other property, including those
under construction.

2.7. The maintenance of means of egress.

2.8. The investigation of the cause, origin, and
circumstances of fire and unauthorized
releases of hazardous materials.

3. The following persons are hereby authorized to
interpret and enforce the provisions of this code and
to make arrests and issue citations as authorized by
law and this code:

3.1. The Unit Chief, Peace Officers and Public
Officers of the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection.

3.2. The Fire Chief, Peace Officers and Public
Officers of the Riverside County Fire
Department.

3.3. The Riverside County Sheriff and any deputy
sheriff.

3.4. The Police Chief and any police officer of
any city served by the Riverside County Fire
-19-

Department.

3.5. Officers of the California Highway Patrol.

3.6. Code Officers of the City of Jurupa Valley
Code Enforcement Department.

3.7. Peace Officers of the California Department of
Parks and Recreation.

3.8. The law enforcement officers of the Federal
Bureau of Land Management.

(4) Amendment-Section 104.7-Liability.

Section 104.7 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

104.7 Liability. Any liability against Riverside County or the City of Jurupa Valley or any officer or employee for damages resulting from the discharge of their duties shall be as provided by law.

(5) Addition-Section 104.13-Authority of the Fire Chief to close hazardous fire areas.

Section 104.13 is hereby added to read as follows:

104.13 Authority of the Fire Chief to close hazardous fire areas.

Except upon National Forest Land, the Fire Chief is authorized to determine and announce the closure of any hazardous fire area or portion thereof. Any closure by the Fire Chief for a period of more than fifteen (15) calendar days must be approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors or City Council, as applicable, within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Fire Chief’s original order of closure. Upon such closure, no person shall go in or be upon any hazardous fire area, except upon the public roadways and inhabited areas. During such closure, the Fire Chief shall erect and maintain at all entrances to the closed area sufficient signs giving notice of closure. This section shall not prohibit residents or owners of private property within any closed area, or their invitees, from going in or being upon their lands. This section shall not apply to any entry, in the cour se of duty, by a peace officer, duly authorized public officer or fire department personnel. For the purpose of this section, “hazardous fire area” shall mean public or private land that is covered with grass, grain, -20-

brush or forest and situated in a locat ion that makes suppression difficult resulting in great damage. Such areas are designated on Hazardous Fire Area maps filed with the office of the Fire Chief. (6) Amendment-Section 107.2-Schedule of permit fees.

Section 107.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

107.2 Schedule of permit fees. Fees for services and permits shall be as set forth in the fee schedule established by the City of Jurupa Valley.

(7) Addition-Section 107.7-Cost recovery.

Section 107.7 is hereby added to read as follows:

107.7 Cost recovery. Fire suppression, investigation, rescue, or emergency medical costs are recoverable in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 13009 and 13009.1, as may be amended from time to time. Additionally, any person who negligently, intentionally, or in violation of law causes an emergency response, including, but not limited to, a traffic accident, spill of toxic or flammable fluids or chemicals is liable for the costs of securing such emergency, including those costs pursuant to Government Code Section 53150 et seq., as may be amended from time to time. Any expense incurred by the Riverside County Fire Department for securing such emergency shall constitute a debt of such person and shall be collectable by Riverside County in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under contract, express or implied.

(8) Amendment-Section 111.1 Board of appeals established.

Section 111.1 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

111.1 Board of appeals established. The Board of Appeals shall be defined and held in conformance with Section 8.10.030 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.

(9) Amendment-Section 112.4---Violation penalties.

Section 112.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

112.4 Violation and penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association of persons to violate any -21-

provision of this code, or to violate the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this code. Punishments and penalties for violations shall be in accordance with the City of Jurupa Valley ordinances, any applicable fee schedule and Health and Safety Code Sections 17995, et seq.
(10) Amendment-Section 202-Fire Chief definition.

The following definition in Section 202 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

FIRE CHIEF. The Fire Chief of Riverside County or the Fire Chiefs designee.

(11) Amendment-Section 308.1.6.3-Sky lanterns.

Section 308.1.6.3 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

308.1.6.3 Sky lanterns or similar devices. A person shall not release or cause to be released a sky lantern or similar device.

(12) Amendment-Section 503.2.1-Dimensions.

Section 503.2.1 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet (7315 mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm). For additional requirements or alternatives s ee Riverside County Fire Department Standards and Policies, as may be amended from time to time and the same are hereby incorporated by reference and may be reviewed in the Office of the County Fire Department.

(13) Amendment-Section 503.2.2-Authority.

Section 503.2.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall be the only authority authorized to designate fire apparatus access roads and fire lanes and to modify the minimum fire lane access -22-

widths for fire or rescue operations.

(14) Addition-Section 503.6.1 Automatic opener.

Section 503.6.1 is hereby added to read as follows:

503.6.1 Automatic opener. New motorized gates shall be
provided with means to be automatically opened remotely by emergency vehicle in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Standards and Policies, as may be amended from time to time and the same are hereby incorporated by reference and may be reviewed in the Office of the County Fire
Department.

Exception: Gates serving individual one- and two-family dwelling parcels.

(15) Addition-Section 503.7-Loading areas and passenger drop-off areas.

Section 503.7 is hereby added to read as follows:

503.7 Loading areas and passenger drop-off areas. On private properties, where fire apparatus access roads are utilized for loading or unloading or utilized for passenger drop-off or pick- up, an additional eight (8) feet of width shall be added to the minimum required width for the fire apparatus access road.

(16) Addition-Section 507.5.7-Fire hydrant size and outlets.

Section 507.5.7 is hereby added to tread as follows:

507.5.7 Fire hydrant size and outlets. As determined by the fire code official, fire hydrant sizes and outlets shall be based on the following:

1. Residential Standard- one (1) four (4) inch outlet and one (1) two and half (2 ½) inch outlet.

2. Super Hydrant Standard- one (1) four (4) inch outlet and two
-23-

(2) two and one-half (2 ½) inch outlet.

3. Super Hydrant Enhanced - two (2) four (4) inch outlet and one
(1) two and one-half (2 ½) inch outlet.

(17) Addition-Section 507.5.7-Fire hydrant street marker.

Section 507.5.8 is hereby added to read as follows:

507.5.8 Fire hydrant street marker. Fire hydrant locations shall be visually indicated in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Technical Policy 06 -11, as may be amended from time to time. Any hydrant marker damaged or removed during the course of street construction or repair shall be immediately replaced by the contractor, developer, or person responsible for removal or damage.
(18) Amendment-Section 508.1-General.

Section 508.1 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

508.1 General. Where required by other sections of this code and in all buildings classified as high-rise buildings by the California Building Code, in all buildings greater than 300,000 square feet (27 870 m2), and in Group I -2 occupancies having occupied floors located more than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access a fire command center for fire department operations shall be provided and shall comply with Sections 508.1.1 through 508.1.7.

(19) Amendment-Section 508.1.1-Location and access.

Section 508.1.1 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Location and access. The fire command center shall be located adjacent to the main l obby and shall be accessible from fire department vehicular access or as approved by the fire code official.

The room shall have direct access from the building exterior at the lowest level of fire department access.

(20) Amendment-Section 508.1.3-Size.

Section 508.1.3 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

-24-

508.1.3 Size. The fire command center shall be not less than 0.015 percent of the total building area of the facility served or 200 square feet (19 m2) in area, whichever is greater, with a minimum dimension of 0.7 times the square root of the room area or 10 feet (3048 mm), whichever is greater.

Where a fire command center is solely required because a building is greater than 300,000 square feet (27 870 m2), the fire command center shall h ave a minimum size of 96 square feet (9 m2) with a minimum dimension of 8 feet (2438 mm) where approved by the fire code official. Amendment-Section 508.1.6-Required features.

(21) Addition-Section 509.2.1 Minimum clearances.

Section 509.2.1 is hereby added to read as follows:

509.2.1 Minimum clearances. A 3-foot (914 mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of exterior fire protection system control valves, or any other exterior fire protection system component that may require immediate access, except as otherwise required or approved.

(22) Amendment-Section 608.11.1.2-Manual operation.

Section 608.11.1.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

608.11.1.2 Manual operation. An automatic emergency stop feature shall be provided in accordance with Sections 605.10.2.1 and 605.10.2.2. When required by the fire code official, automatic crossover valves shall be capable of manual operation. The manual valves s hall be located in an approved location immediately outside of the machinery room in a secure metal box or equivalent and marked as Emergency Controls.

(23) Amendment-Section 903.2-Where required.

Section 903.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

903.2 Where required. In all new buildings and structures which are 3,600 square feet or greater, an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided regardless of occupancy classification.

Where Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.21 of the California Fire Code require more restrictive requirements than those listed -25-

below, the more restrictive requirement shall take precedence.

Exception: Unless required elsewhere in this code or the California Building Code, automatic fire sprinkler systems shall not be required for the following:

1. Detached Group U occupancies used for
agricultural purposes.

2. Detached non-combustible equestrian arena
shade canopies that are open on all sides and
used for riding only - no commercial, assembly
or storage uses.

3. Detached fabric or non-combustible shade
structures that are open on all sides and used to
shade playground equipment, temporary storage
of vehicles and dining areas with no cooking.

4. Where determined by the Fire Chief that no
major life safety hazard exists, and the fuel load
does not pose a significant threat to firefighter
safety or to other structures or property,
automatic fire sprinklers may be exempted.

One- and two-family dwellings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system regardless of square footage in accordance with the California Residential Code. Fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in mobilehomes, manufactured homes, and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of
Regulations.

The following exceptions in the California Fire Code shall not be allowed:

a. Exception in Section 903.2.3
b. Exception in Section 903.2.11.3

(24) Amendment-Section 903.2.3-Group E.

Section 903.2.3 is hereby amended to delete the exception listed within subsection 2.

-26-

(25) Amendment-Section 903.2.11.3-Buildings 55 feet or more in height.

Section 903.2.11.3 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

903.2.11.3 Buildings 55 feet or more in height. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout buildings that have one or more stories with an occupant load of 30 or more located 55 feet (16, 764 mm) or more above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, measured to the finished floor.

Exceptions:

1. Open parking structures.

(26) Addition-Section 903.3.5.3-Hydraulically calculated systems.

Section 903.3.5.3 is hereby added to read as follows:

903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems. The design of hydraulically calculated fire sprinkler systems shall not exceed 90% of the water supply capacity.

(27) Addition-Section 3204.2.1-Minimum requirements for client leased or occupant owned warehouses.

Section 3204.2.1 is hereby added to read as follows:

3204.2.1 Minimum requirements for c lient lea sed or occupant owned warehouses. Designs of an automatic sprinkler system for client leased or occupant owned buildings containing high pile storage shall be based on the requirements of NFPA 13. The responsible fire protection engineer shall perform a survey of the building to determine commodity classification, s torage configuration, building height, and other infor mation related to the development of an appropriate sprinkler system design. The fire protection engineer shall also make reasonable efforts to meet with the building owner or operator to understand seasonal or customer related fluctuations to the stored commodities, storage height, and configuration. The sprinkler design shall be based on the most demanding requirements determined through the onsite survey and discussions with the building owner or operator. The technical report shall describe the basis fo r determining the commodity and sprinkler design selection, how the commodities will be isolated or separated, and include references to the design document(s). If a specific fire test is used as the basis of design, -27-

a copy of the fire test report shall be provided at the time of plan review.
(28) Addition-Section 4904.2.1-High Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps.

Section 4904.2.1 is hereby added to read as follows:

4904.2.1 High Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps. In accordance with Government Code Sections 51175 thro ugh 51189, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), located in the Local
Responsibility Areas (LRA), are designated as shown on the most recently published VHFHSZ IN LRA map, as recommended and published by the Director of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), which may be revised from time to time. The most recent VHFHSZ IN LRA map is on file at the office of the Fire Chief, which supersedes other maps previously adopted by Riverside County designating high fire hazard areas.

(29) Amendment-Table B105.2 Required fire flow for buildings other than on- and two-family dwellings, Group R-3 and R-4 buildings and townhouses.

Table B105.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

TABLE B105.2

REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW FOR BUILDINGS OTHER THAN ONE-AND
TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, GROUP R-3 AND R-4 BUILDINGS AND

TOWNHOUSES

AUTOMATIC

SPRINKLER
SYSTEM
(Design Standard)

MINIMUM FIRE-
FLOW
Gallons per minute)
FLOW

DURATION
(hours)
No automatic sprinkler
system
Value in Table
B105.1(2)
Duration in Table
B105.1(2)
Section 903.3.1.1 of the
California Fire Code
50% of the value in
Table Bl05.1(2l
Duration in Table
B105.1(2) at the
reduced flow rate
Section 903.3.1.2 of the
California Fire Code
50% of the value in Table
B105.1(2l
Duration in Table
B105.1(2) at the
reduced
flow rate
-28-

For SI: 1 gallon per minute= 3.785 Lim.
a. The reduced fire-flow shall be not less than 1,000 gallons per minute. b. The reduced fire-flow shall be not less than 1,500 gallons per minute.

(31) Section C103.1 of the California Fire Code is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

C103.1 Hydrant spacing. Fire apparatus access roads and public streets providing required access to buildings in accordance with Section 503 of the International Fire Code shall be provided with one or more fire hydrants, as determined by Section C102.1. Where more than one fire hydrant is required, the distance between required fire hydrants shall be in accordance with Sections C103.2 and C103.3. Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections.

Sec. 8.10.030. -Appeals and hearings.

All appeals or other hearings required by the provisions of the California Fire Code, 2019 Edition, adopted by this chapter shall be conducted pursuant to Chapter 2.40 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. Whenever the term "Appeals Board," "Board of Appeals" or other similar language is indicted by any of the codes adopted by this chapter, it shall mean the Hearing Officer pursuant to Chapter 2.05 of this Code." Section 7. Prior Ordinances Repealed. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, all former ordinances or parts thereof conflicting or inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance of the codes herein adopted by reference and any other ordinance in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and declared to be of no further force and effect; provided,. however, that this action shall not affect or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance and provided further that the Codes adopted by reference an d amended by Ordinance No. 2019 - 18 shall continue to be applicable to construction wherein plans have been submitted for plan check as of the effective date of this Ordinance so long as the initial permit therefor is issued no later than ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Ordinance.

Section 8. Effect of Ordinance . This Ordinance is intended to supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance.

This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 2023.

Section 9. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 17th day of November.

-29-

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-30-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-18 was duly introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 20th day of October, 2022, and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of November, 2022, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 17th day of November, 2022.

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1

120

STAFF REPORT

DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2022

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: KEITH CLARKE, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL

SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.E

CONSIDERATION OF TH E ADOPTION OF THE NEW CALIFORNIA

BUILDING CODES AND THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND SETTING

THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF THESE CODES FOR
NOVEMBER 17, 2022

RECOMMENDATION

1) That the City Council set the public hearing on the adoption of the Building Codes Ordinance and Fire Code Ordinance for November 17, 2022 and direct the City Clerk to publish notice of this public hearing and the proposed adoption of these codes in the manner required by law.

2) That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2022- 18, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 8.05, ADOPTION OF CONSTRUCTION CODES, TO TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE (1) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, (2) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE, (3) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, (4) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, (5) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, (6) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, (7 ) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, (8) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, (9) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERE NCE STANDARDS CODE, (10) THE 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, (11) THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL

PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERT AIN

AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS TO SUCH CODES AND AMENDING
CHAPTER 8.10, ADOPTION OF FIRE CODES, TO TITLE 8 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 201 9

Page | 2

EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN

AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS TO SUCH CODE

DISCUSSION
Building Codes

The California Building Standards Commission recently adopted the 2022 Edition of the California Building Codes, which is also known as the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 (California Code of Regulations, Title 24). The 2022 California Building Codes include the California Building Code, the California Historical Building Code, the California Existing Building Code the California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, the California Electr ical Code, the California Energy Code, the California Green Building Code, the California Reference Standards Code, the California Residential Code and the International Property Maintenance Code. The accompanying ordinance will adopt these Building Codes and bring the City’s building regulations into compliance with the latest codes adopted by the California Building Standards Commission. The 2019 State Building Codes have been in effect in the City since January 1, 2020 and will be su perseded by these new 2022 State Building Codes.

Further, these modifications must be directly related to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions in the form of a Resolution, and must be filed directly with the Building Standards Commission after its adoption.

The 2022 California Building Codes are based on the 2021 edition of the International Building Code, published by the International Code Council (ICC), the 2021 edition of the International Historical Building Code published by ICC, the 2021 edition of the International Existing Building Code published by ICC, the 2021 edition of the International Mechanical Code published by ICC, the 2021 edition of the International Plumbing Code published by ICC, the 2020 edition of the National Electrical Code published by NFPA, the 2021 edition of the International Energy Code published by ICC, the 2021 edition of the International Green Building Code published by ICC, the 2021 edition of the International Reference Standards Code published by ICC, the 2021 edition of the International Residential Code published by ICC and the 2021 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code published by ICC.

It should be noted that the amendments to the administrative provisions and regulations, addressing elements of construction that are not regulated by the California Building

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.C
PUBL
IC HEARING TO CONSIDER MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
21143: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 210 03; CHANGE
OF ZONE (CZ) NO. 21004; WAIVER OF MINIMUM NINE-ACRE AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARD; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO.
38151 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) NO . 22089;
PROJECT: “MADONE COLLECTION” PLANNED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT - SUBDIVIDE 6.92 ACRES OF LAND INTO 35 LOTS FOR SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED HO MES; LOCATION: 7586
JURUPA ROAD ( APN: 183-030-014); (APPLICANT: TK

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC)

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2022- 109, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21003, WAIVER OF MINIMUM NINE-ACRE AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARD, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
22089, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38151 TO PERMIT A SCHEDULE “A” SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 6.92 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN: 183- 030-014) INTO THIRTY -FIVE (35) SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, COMMON AREAS, PRIVATE

STREETS, AND A RETENTION BASIN
2) That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2022- 21, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONE OF APPROXIMAT ELY 6.92-ACRES OF

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN: 183 -030-014) FROM A-1 (LIGHT AGRICULTURE) TO R-4 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT), AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project, Madone Collection Planned Residential Development, consists of the subdivision of 6. 92 acres of land into 35 lots for single- family detached homes. The average lot size would be 5,420 square feet and the proposed single-family homes would include a combination of one- and two- story floor plans ranging in size from 1,215 to 1,800 square feet in floor area ( “The Project”). The proposed development would also include the following site improvements: residential amenities including open play areas, walking trails, exercise stations, tot lot, gazebo, BBQ area, picnic benches and seating areas; private street improvements, individual lot and streetscape landscaping, retention basin, and walls and fencing.

PROJECT LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
The Project is located at 7586 Jurupa Road. The site is located on the south side of Jurupa Road, with Camino Real to the east, Camino Real Elementary School to the south, residential uses to the west and northeast, and Patriot High School to the northwest.

Exhibit 1 shows the project location. Table 1 outlines the surrounding land uses and General Plan and Zoning designations.

EXHIBIT 1: PROJECT SITE

Page | 3

Table 1: Project Information and Surrounding Land Uses
Location Current
Land Use
General Plan
Land Use Designation Zoning
Project Site Vacant land LDR (Country
Neighborhood) A-1 (Light Agriculture)
North
Union Pacific Railroad
Jurupa Road
Patriot High School
Single Family Residential
• LDR (Country
Neighborhood)
• PF (Public
Facilities/Institutional)

• MDR (Medium Density
Residential)
• R-A-20000
(Residential
Agriculture – min.
20,000 sq. ft.)
• R-1 (Single Family
Detached)
• A-1 (Light
Agriculture)
South Camino Real Elementary
School
LDR (Country
Neighborhood) A-1 (Light Agriculture)
East Camino Real
Centennial Park
LDR (Country
Neighborhood) A-1 (Light Agriculture)
West Single Family Residential LDR (Country
Neighborhood)
• A-1 (Light
Agriculture)
• R-A (Residential
Agriculture)

REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS
The Project will require the following entitlements and waiver applications:
• General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21003: Change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) to allow for the proposed small lot single-family detached dwellings at a density of

5.1 dwelling units per acre. LDR allows for a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre and MHDR allows for a maximum of 8 dwelling units per acre. • Change of Zone (CZ) No. 21004: Change the underlying zoning classification from A-1 (Light Agriculture) to R -4 (Planned Development) to accommodate the proposed small lot single- family detached dwellings. The R -4 Zone shall not be applied to any area containing less than nine (9) acres unless the City Council grants a waiver to the minimum area requirement for an R -4 Zone. The subject property is 6.92 acres in area. As part of the change of zone request the Planning Commission shall review the waiver request and make a recommendation to the City Council.
• Waiver of minimum nine-acre area requirement for the R -4 Zone: Approve a waiver to allow a 6.92- acre area in lieu of the R -4 Zone minimum nine -acre requirement.
• Site Development Permit (SDP) No.22089: Proposed development of 35 single- family homes subject to the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards. • Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38151: Subdivide the 6.92 acres site into 35 lots for single-family detached homes and common areas and private streets.

Page | 4

BACKGROUND
Planning Commission Study Session
On January 27, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a Study Session to review, discuss and provide feedback on the Applicant's initial submittal. R esponses to the Planning Commission’s feedback are included within the October 12, 2022 Planning Commission staff report, provided as Attachment 4.

Traditional Neighborhood Development Standards
On November 5, 2020, the City Council initiated a code amendment to add desig n and development standards into the Municipal Code requiring new single- family residential subdivisions that have a density greater than two dwelling units per acre to create traditional neighborhoods that preserve the small town character of the communit y. The Traditional Neighborhood Design Ordinance was adopted by the City Council on February 3, 2022. The subject application was in process during the rev iew and adoption process of the Traditional Neighborhood Design Ordinance. The ordinance applies to all proposed development projects including those that were in the review process at the time of adoption. As such, the proposed Project is subject to the ordinance.

At the time of adoption of the ordinance, the Project did not meet some of the development standards contained in the ordinance, specifically standards related to setbacks, ratio of single-story to two-story homes, and Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Subsequently, the Applicant redesigned the project to comply with the adopted Traditional Neighborhood Development Standards, and to address initial comments from the Planning Commission. Initially the proposed Project had 42 units when presented to the Planning Commission at the Study Session. In response to comments from the Planning C ommission, the project was reduced to 36 units and was further reduced to the proposed 35 units to comply with the Traditional Neighborhood Development Standards. The Analysis section below outlines the proposed Project’s compliance with the standards.

Planning Commission Public Hearing
On October 12, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered the proposed Project. The Planning Commission deliberated and discussed the following items:

1. Camino Real Roadway Improvements and Project Access
: The Commission
discussed the proposed vehicular ingress and egress from the Project site to Camino Real specifically related to a dedicated right -turn lane on southbound Camino Real into the Project site and a dedicated left-turn lane into the Project site from northbound Camino Real. It was confirmed that the developer would be responsible for providing a 77- foot paved roadway section for Camino Real with an 18 foot wide landscaped parkway with sidewalk on the west side of Camino Real and one northbound through land with a dedicated left turn lane into the Project site and one southbound through lane with a dedicated right turn lane into the Project site.

2. Equestrian Trail on Jurupa Road: The Commission discussed the project’s impact to the existing equestrian trail along the project’s north property line along Jurupa Page | 5

Road adjacent to the railroad track. Staff confirmed that the existing equestrian trail will remain in place and will not be impacted by the project.

After the discussion, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.10- 12-01, on a 4-0 vote, recommending that the City Council approve the project. The October 12, 2022 Planning Commission staff report and excerpt of the meeting minutes are respectively provided as Attachments 4 and 5.

PROJECT DETAILS
A. Overall Plan. The proposed Project consists of a 35 -unit planned residential development of one- and two- story single-family detached homes with lot sizes ranging from 4,635 to 5,929 square feet in area, with an average lot size of 5,420 square feet. Approximately 75% of the homes would be one-story homes.

The development proposes varying front yard setbacks , architecturally enhanced designs, and single- story elements to break up long stretches of linear massing, and when combined with private outdoor spaces, such as front porches and generous front yards, promotes an interactive street scene that encourages pedestrian activity.

Pursuant to the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards, landscaped front yards and parkways, and front porches are the main streetscape design elements rather than garages. The single-story home plans would have either rear side loaded garages or front-loaded garages. The front loaded garages will be set back 12' from the front living area of the home. The rear side loaded garages will be tucked in behind the home and not be visible from the street frontage. Each lot will have private fenced back y ards. A 10- foot parkway is provided throughout the interior of the development. The interior parkways will be landscape adjacent to the curb and gutter with shade trees and drought tolerant landscaping. There will be 5-foot pedestrian sidewalk on both sides on the interior streets with connections to the common recreation areas . A Homeowner Association (HOA) would maintain all interior streets and common areas. Table 2 depicts applicable development standards. Exhibit 2 shows the proposed site plan for the Project, and Exhibit 3 is a 3 -D perspective of the south side of the end of “C” Street.

Page | 6

TABLE 2: PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Minimum Lot Requirements Per R4 Standards
Lot Size 3,500 square feet
Overall Area Per Lot Plus Open Space 6,000 square feet
Lot Depth 80 feet
Lot Width 40 feet
Lot Frontage (Knuckles or Cul-de-Sacs) 35 feet
**Setbacks (Minimum)
Front: Living Area (to R.O.W.) 20 feet / 25 foot average Front: Garage (to R.O.W.) 32 feet
Front: Porch/ Balcony (to R.O.W.) 15 feet
Interior Side yard 6 feet
Street I Corner 10 feet
Rear yard 10 feet
**Building Height (Maximum) 35 feet (2 stories maximum) **Ratio of two story homes 25%
**Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1 story home .40
2 story home .25 ground floor; .15 second floor
**Roadway Width
**Parkway Width
36 feet
10 feet with 5 foot landscape parkway and 5 foot
sidewalk
**Open Space 50% of lot area with 90% landscaped
** Traditional Neighborhood Design Standard

Page | 7

EXHIBIT 2 SITE PLAN

EXHIBIT 3
3-D PERSPECTIVE

B. Access, Circulation, and Parking. The development would have one access point from Camino Real connecting to “ A” street and the two interior cul -de- sacs (“B” and “C” Street). A dedicated right turn lane from southbound Camino Real and a dedicated left turn lane from northbound Camino Real into “A” Street will be provided The main entry would include decorative paving, decorative block walls, and monument entry signage. All interior streets would be private but publicly accessible. There would be no entry gates to the development.

Access to and from Kirby Street to the west would be gated and used for

Page | 8

emergency purposes only. The interior private streets would be 36-feet in width with a 10-foot parkway with 5-foot sidewalks and 5-foot landscape parkway on both sides of the street and decorative street lights. All lots would have a two- car attached garage and parking for two cars in the driveway. On-street parking would be permitted on both sides of the streets providing parking for guest and deliveries. Pedest rian circulation elements include the 5- foot sidewalks connecting to the 5-foot decomposed granite (DG) pedestrian trails to access all common open space areas. Sidewalk access would also connect to a new offsite public sidewalk with an 18 foot wide landscaped parkway along Camino Real to connect residents to nearby schools, parks and other community amenities.

C. Landscaping. Generous landscaping would be included throughout the proposed Project designed to reflect traditional neighborhoods with tree- lined streets and large landscape front yards. The plan includes one canopy tree in the 5-foot wide parkway as well as one canopy tree in the front yard setback area. The canopy trees would be 36-inch box size at planting. Some of the driveways are designed as “ Hollywood” driveways or also called ribbon driveways. There would be two 18-inch parallel concrete strips with turf grass in between. The total amount of landscaped areas throughout the proposed development, including yard, streetscape, and recreation/open space landscaping totals 130,350 square feet (approximately 3 acres). All plants would be compliant with California Green Building requirements for water conservation and the California Invasive Plant Council requirements for non- invasive plants. In addition, the final landscape plan would be required to comply with the water efficiency landscape design requirements of the zoning code. Exhibit 4 below shows the proposed landscape site plan.

EXHIBIT 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN

Page | 9

D. Open Space and Recreational Amenities. The proposed Project would include 25,789 square feet of common recreation and open space area.

Common recreation areas are provided on the north and south side of the development. Decomposed granite (DG) walking trai ls would connect to all amenities within the community from the sidewalks. The trails would meander throughout the open spaces connecting all exercise stations and other amenities. The amenities would include walking trails, exercise stations, a tot lot, seating areas, a gazebo, and a BBQ area. The common open space area would include the following:
• Open play areas will accommodate passive play opportunities and small-scale activities.
• Barbecue area with a picnic table, freestanding barbecue, hot coal container, and trash container.
• Tot Lot Play area including structures and equipment for various age groups.
• Gazebo/Shade Structure with picnic benches and trash containers. • Exercise Stations with diverse equipment throughout the community connected by DG walking trails.

Exhibit 5 below shows the proposed recreational amenities.

EXHIBIT 5: RECREATIONAL AMENITIES

Page | 10

E. Architecture and Building Design. The architectural character of the Project is intended to reflect traditional neighborhood design elements with a range of architectural styles including Craftsman, Traditional and Farmhouse with the following architectural standards:
• Detailing and coloring true to the style of home with traditional materials including: stucco, shake, shingle, vertical board, and batten wood siding; brick, stone and wood columns; and light earth tone colors • Five different floor plans each with 3 different architectural styles to create variety and interest in the neighborhood
• Varied roof pitches with large roof overhangs to reflect the architectural style and reduce massing.
• Flat tile , low profile “ S” tile, and metal roof styles to match the architectural style
• Single story homes make up 75% of the lots
• Single story homes on corner lots to reduce massing
• Varied garage placement including rear attached garages. • Garage doors with a minimum 6” recess and garage door windows that relate to the architectural style of the home
• Varied lot setbacks to create individuality and reduce monotonous streetscape
• Front porches on all homes
• Varied building plane setbacks to promote variety and articulation within building planes
• Exterior lighting to match the architectural style of the home with wall or ceiling hung ornamental coach lights with translucent glass Home Plans:

The proposed Project wo uld have five different floor plans, four single story plans and one two-story plan ranging from 1,215 to 1,800 square feet in area with a 434 square foot two-car garage. Each of the five floor plans would be available in any of the three architectural st yles; Craftsman, Traditional, or Farmhouse providing for a diverse architectural mixture in the Project. Table 3 below is a summary of each of the proposed home plans and Exhibit 6 illustrates examples of each of the various architectural styles. Details on the proposed building material and colors, and floor plans are contained in the R-4 Neighborhood Development Plan (Attachment 6 ). A recommended condition of approval requires architectural features and fenestration to be continuous on all sides of the dwelling units.

Page | 11

Table 3: Home Plan Summary
Plan No. Stories Floor Area Bed/Bath Height Garage Lots Total 120 1 1,215 SF 3 Bed/2 Bath 24 ft Rear 13,16,21,29 4
140 1 1,429 SF 4 Bed/2 Bath 24 ft Rear 15,17,21,32 4
160 1 1,601 SF 3 Bed/2 ½ Bath 24 ft Front 5,12,18,24,27,35 6 170 1 1,751 SF 4 Bed/2 ½ Bath 24 ft Front 1,3,7,8,10,14,19,20, 23,25,30,34
12 180 2 1,800 SF 4 Bed/2 ½ Bath 32 ft Rear 2,4,6,9,11,26,28,31, 33 9

EXHIBIT 6: PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
Plan 120 with Craftsman Elevation

Plan 140 with Farmhouse Elevation

Page | 12

Plan 160 with Farmhouse Elevation

Plan 170 with Traditional Elevation

Plan 180 with Craftsman Elevation
F. Walls and Fences. The wall and fences for the development would be made of decorative materials to be compatible with the overall architectural character of the development and surrounding neighborhoods. The proposed fences and walls include the following:
• North Property Line abutting the railroad right-of-way - 6-feet tall tan split face masonry wall with tan precision cap.
• South Property Line - 3-feet tall tan split face masonry retaining wall with a 3-foot tan tubular steel fence on top of retaining wall. • West Property Line - 6-feet tall split face masonry wall with tan precision cap.
• East Property Line - 6-feet tall tan split face masonry wall with tan precision cap and with tan split face pilaster with precision cap every 40 feet. The wall will sit on 3 to 5- foot varied tan masonry retaining wall.

Page | 13

• Monument sign at the entrance - Tan split face masonry wall varying from 3- 6-feet wall with tan split face pilaster at each end of monument wall. 18-inch ornate light fixtures on top of each pilaster. • Yard Fencing – 6-feet tall tan vinyl fence with access gate.

Details on the walls are contained in the R-4 Neighborhood Development Plan (Attachment 6).

ANALYSIS
I. GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION
A. Residential Land Use & Density. The Project will require amendments to the General Plan land use designation and zoning classification to allow the proposed Project at the subject site.
• General Plan Land Use Designation. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of LDR (Country Neighborhood). The proposed General Plan land use designation is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) to allow for the proposed small lot single- family detached dwellings at a density of 5.1 dwelling units per acre. LDR allows for a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre and MHDR allows for a maximum of 8 dwelling units per acre.

• Zoning Designation. The project site has a zoning classification of A-1 (Light Agriculture). The proposed zoning designation is R -4 (Planned Development) to accommodate the proposed small lot single- family detached dwellings. The R -4 Zone shall not be applied to any area containing less than nine (9) acres unless the City Council grants a waiver to the minimum area requirement for an R -4 Zone. The subject property is 6.92 acres in area. As part of the change of zone request , the Planning Commission made a recommendation that the City Council approve this waiver . The proposed Project site offers a unique opportunity to develop an entry -level traditional single -family neighborhood with various architectural styles, tree lined streets, generous front yard landscaping, open space, and recreational amenities that are not often found in a typical tract home development.

The proposed project meets all of the applicable development standards of the R4 zone and the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards within in the 6.92-acre site. Due to the unique qualities of the proposed Project, Staff supports the waiver request for the minimum site area and recommends the City Council approve the waiver.

II. ZONING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The project is subject to the R -4 and Traditional Neighborhood Development Standards of the Z oning Ordinance. The proposed project complies with all applicable development standards and no adjustments or variances are required. Table 4 below outlines the project ’s compliance with the applicable Zoning Code development standards.

Page | 14

TABLE 4. ZONING CODE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
and

TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Standard Does the Project Comply?
Lot Size Minimum Size: 3,500 square-
feet
Minimum Width: 40 feet
Minimum Depth: 80 feet
Yes, minimum lot is 4,635 sf and average
lot size is 5,420 sf. Minimum lot width is
42 feet and minimum lot depth is 109 feet.

Building Height 35 feet (2 stories maximum) Yes, single-story homes are 24 feet in height and two-story homes are 32 feet in
height.

Floor Area Ratio
(FAR)
1 story home 40%
2 story home 25% ground
floor; 15% second floor
Yes. Single-story ranges from 34%-40%;
Two-story ranges from 23%-25% first
floor and 13%-15% second floor
Open Space 50% of lot area with 90%
landscaped
Yes, open space areas range from 50%-
54% with 90% of open space area
landscaped
Ratio of two
story homes
25% Yes. According to the 25% ratio (25% of
35 homes is 9), 9 two-story homes are
permitted. Nine two-story homes are
included.

Setbacks
Front: 20 feet
Front: Garage 30 feet
Front: Porch/ Balcony 15
feet
Interior Side yard: 6 feet
Street I Corner Side yard:10
feet
Rear yard: 10 feet
Yes
Front: 20-30 feet
Front: Garage 32 feet minimum
Front: Porch/ Balcony 15 feet
Interior Side yard: 6-11 feet
Street I Corner Side yard:10-12 feet
Rear yard: 10 -31 feet
Parking 2 covered garage spaces Yes, 2 car garages p lus tw o uncovered spaces provided for each home
Streets 56 feet minimum right of way
36 foot roadway
5 foot landscape parkway
5 foot sidewalk
Yes, streets meet minimum requirements
Walls and
Fences
Maximum 6 feet high Yes, 6 foot high maximum fences/walls proposed
**The project meets all other applicable zoning code development standards III. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING . In response to the Planning Commission’s inquiry during the study session, the applicant voluntarily agreed to include three (3) affordable units at the moderate income level within the proposed Project. The City has since adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance that requires new residential developments to either include 7% of the proposed units as affordable housing or Page | 15

pay an affordable housing in lieu fee. Ordinance No. 2022- 14 was adopted by the City Council on August 18, 2022 with an effective date of September 18, 2022. As such, the applicant is formally required to provide affordable housing or pay an in lieu fee pursuant to the ordinance. The three proposed affordable units that would be constructed on-site comply with the 7% inclusionary requirement.

IV. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP. Subdivisions are regulated by Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Subdivision Code and with the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21003 and Change of Zone No. 21004.

Right-Of-Way Improvements
Kirby Drive shall be restricted to emergency vehicles only and existing residents to the south and west. It would be improved with a 24 -ft pavement section and a 4-ft easterly parkway to include curb adjacent landscaping and curb & gutter.

Camino Real would be improved with a 77- ft pavement section and an 18- ft westerly parkway to include curb adjacent landscaping, 5-ft sidewalk, and curb & gutter.

The intersection of Camino Real (NS) and proposed “C” Street (EW) shall be full access into and out of the project site. Northbound Camino Real will include one through lane and one left-turn lane into “A” Street. Southbound Camino Real will include one through lane and one right-turn lane into “A” Street; and “A” street will include one shared right-turn and left-turn lane out of the project site onto Camino Real.

The ultimate improvements for Camino Real include widening the roadway from two lanes to four lanes, which requires modification of an existing culvert structure over a flood control facility and a signal modification at Jurupa Rd. These ultimate improvements are included in the City’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), however, the Project is providing necessary dedication and roadway paving along their frontage to facilitate the future CIP roadway widening.

Water and Sewer Improvements
Water and sewer service to the project site will be provided by the Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD). The County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has prepared the r equired SANS 53 clearance letter, which states that JCSD will provide water and sewer service to the proposed subdivision.

V. FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION MAPS (SECTION 7.15.180) The project is in conformance with the General Plan, Zoning Code, and Subdivision Code with the approval of the General Plan Amendment No. 21003 and Change of Zone No. 21004. The land division is physically suitable for the type of development and density proposed . The design of the project will not Page | 16

cause substantial environmental damage, harm any wildlife, nor cause serious public health problems. See Attachment No. 1 (Resolution) for detailed findings for the approval of TTM No. 38151.

VI. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) Per Zoning Code Section 9 .240.330(3) -Requirements for Approval, no Site Development Permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:

A. “The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan and with all applicab le requirements of State law and the ordinance of the City of Jurupa Valley. ” The Project is consistent with the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and applicable State law. The proposed General Plan land use designation is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) to allow for the proposed small lot single-family detached dwellings at a density of 5.1 dwelling units per acre.

MHDR allows for a maximum of 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning classification is Planned Development (R -4). The approval of the General Plan Amendment and the Change of Zone will acc ommodate the proposed 35 single-family detached homes residential project.

B. “The overall development of the land shall be designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall take into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof. ”
The combination of the site design, building design, compliance with all applicable development standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval will ensure that the project as designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Project is consistent with the logical development of the land use and with the surrounding land uses. The proposed Project site offers a unique opportunity to develop an entry level traditional single- family neighborhood with various architectural styles, tree lined streets, generous front yard landscaping, open space, and recreational amenities that are not often found in a typical tract home development. The proposed project meets all of the applicable development standards of the R- 4 zone and the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards.

The proposed Project considers the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion in that it includes public right -of-way improvements along Page | 17

Camino Real, and sufficient on -site pedestrian and vehicular access, and vehicular parking.

The proposed Project takes into account topographical and d rainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof in that topographical and drainage conditions have been addressed through an approved Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan and proposed Conditions of Approval recommended the City ’s Engineering Department.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared for the Project. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is supported by an Initial Study that evaluated potential environmental effects of the Project. The proposed MND determines that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on t he environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures as contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) have been required or revisions in the Project have been made or agreed to by the Applicant.

Public Review Period
The public review period for the environmental document began on September 9, 2022 and ended on September 28 , 2022. To date, the City has not received any comments.

The IS/MND with MMRP and Appendices are available on the City's w ebsite at:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/View/2393/MA21143-PUBLIC-REVIEW- MND-9-9-22-v2

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The time to process this appli cation will be covered by a developer application deposit.

No additional costs to the City are anticipated.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
The Community Development Department mailed public hearing notices to property owners within 1,000 feet of the boundaries of the project site. The radius map of the notified area is provided as Attachment 8 . Additionally, a legal advertisement w as published in the Press Enterprise on November 7, 2022. To date, no comments have been received.

CONCLUSION
The proposed Project would provide much needed market rate housing at a lower price point for middle income families in a predominantly residential area. The project meets the General Plan policy goals of increasing residential density while proposing high quality unit design and innovative design solutions. The proposed project was included in the City’s approved 6th cycle housing element as a potential housing site. The higher density of this project would provide more affordable home prices than many other planned residential communities, enhancing access to much needed housing for the city’s growing population. Further, the Project complies with the Traditional Neighborhood Development Standards requirement for single- family residential Page | 18

subdivisions to be consistent with the aff ordable housing requirements of the General Plan Housing Element. The project would provide three affordable housing units on-site.

The residential community would be compatible with the neighboring school and adjacent residential communities.

Reviewed by: Submitted by:

Joe Perez
Community Development
Director

Rod B. Butler
City Manager
Reviewed by: Reviewed by:

Connie Cardenas
Administrative Services Director Michael Flad
Assistant City Manager

Reviewed by:

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 2022-109
a. Exhibit A: General Plan Amendment Exhibit
b. Exhibit B: Change of Zone Exhibit
c. Exhibit C: Mitigated Negative Declaration with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) - (Available on the City's website page under Development Services/Planning/Environmental Reports at
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/View/2393/MA21143- PUBLIC-REVIEW-MND-9-9-22-v2
d. Exhibit D: Recommended Conditions of Approval
Page | 19

2. Ordinance No. 2022-21 for approval of Change of Zone (CZ) No.21004

3. Adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-10-12-01 (without exhibits as these are the same exhibits as the one attached to Resolution No. 2022-108)

4. Planning Commission Staff Report from October 12, 2022 with all attachments, except for Resolution No 2022-10-12-01and resolution attachments, and Project Plans

5. Excerpt of the Planning Commission Minutes from October 12, 2022

6. R-4 Neighborhood Development Plan

7. Project Plan Set (Architectural, Civil, and Landscape Plans)

8. 1,000 Foot Radius Map with Extended Areas

ATTACHMENT NO. 1
City Council
Resolution No.2022-109
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-109

A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING

AND REPORTING PROGRA M, AND APPROVING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21003, WAIVER OF MINIMUM NINE-

ACRE AREA DEVELOPMEN T STANDARD , SITE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 22089, AND TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 38151 TO PERMIT A SCHEDULE “ A” SUBDIVISION
OF APPROXIMATELY 6.92 ACRES OF REAL PROPE RTY
LOCATED AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN: 183-030-014) INTO
THIRTY-FIVE (35) SINGLE-FAMILY RESID ENTIAL LOTS,

COMMON AREAS, PRIVAT E STREETS, AND A RET ENTION
BASIN

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Project. TK Management Services, LLC (the “Applicant”) has applied for General Plan Amendment No. 21003, Waiver of Minimum Nine -Acre Area Development Standard, Change of Zone No. 21004, Site Development Permit No. 22 089, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38151 (collectively, Master Application No. 21143 or MA No. 21143) to permit a Schedule “ A” subdivision of approximately 6.92 acres into thirty-five (35) single-family lots , common areas, private streets , and a retention basin, collectively all on real property located at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN: 183-030-014) (the “Project”).

Section 2. General Plan Amendment.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21003 to change the General Plan land use designation of the subject site (APN: 1 83-030-014) from Country Neighborhood (LDR) to Mediu m High Density Residential (MHDR) , as depicted in Exhibit “A” to this Resolution.
(b) Section 9.30.100.(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that proposals to amend the Jurupa Valley General Plan, or any part or element thereof, shall be heard by the Planning Commission during a public hearing on the matter. (c) Section 9.30.100.(2) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a recomme ndation for approval or disapproval within a reasonable time, by resolution, including therein its findings, and transmit it to the City Council with a copy mailed to the applicant. A recommendation for approval shall be made by the affirmative vote of no t less than a majority of the total membership of the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission cannot reach a decision within a reasonable time after closing the hearing, that fact shall be reported to the City Council and shall be deemed a recommendation to deny the proposal.
-2-
(d) Section 9.30.100.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that upon receipt of a recommendation of the Planning Commission on amendment of the General Plan, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest convenient day and shall give notice of public hearing in the same manner as notice was given of the hearing before the Planning Commission.

Section 3. Waiver of Minimum Nine-Acre Area Development Standard. (a) The Applicant is seeking approval of a waiver of the minimum nine (9) acre area requirement for premises in the Planned Residential (R-4) Zone. The subject Project site is approximately 6.92 acres.
(b) Section 9.100.030. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code pr ovides that the R-4 Zone shall not be applied to any area containing less than nine (9) acres unless the City Council grants a waiver to the minimum area requirement for an R -4 Zone. Further, waiver applications shall be processed in accordance with Secti ons 9.100.030.(1) and (2) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
(c) Section 9.100.030.(2)(a) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission shall review the waiver request and make a recommendation to the City Council.
(d) Section 9.100.030.(2)(b) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the City Council is the approving body for the nine-acre area waiver.

Section 4. Site Development Permit.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Site Development Permit No. 2 2089 to develop approximately 6.92 acres of real property located at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN: 183-030- 014) with thirty-five (35) single-family lots, common areas, private streets, and a retention basin. (b) Section 9.240.550.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code defines the term “traditional neighborhood” as “ a single-family residential neighborhood with primarily one (1) story homes proportionately scaled to the lot, with large front yards generous space between homes, useable outdoor space, wide parkways with canopy street trees and sidewalks, shorter and narrower streets, with pedestrian and street connections to other neighborhoods, commercial centers, schools, civic buildings, and park and recreational spaces.” (c) Section 9.240.550.C. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that all detached single-family residential subdivisions that exceed a density of two (2) units per acre, proposed or entitled after the effective date of Section 9.240.550 (i.e., March 5, 2022) , must be designed and developed in accordance with Section 9.240.550. (d) Section 9.240.550.D.(1) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that a traditional neighborhood design requires Site Development Permit approval in accordance with Section 9.240.330 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. The Site Development Permit must be processed concurrently with the corresponding Tentative Tract or Parcel Map and the required -3-

approval body of the tentative map shall also have approval authority to take action on the Site Development Permit.
(e) Section 9.240.330.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that no site development permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:
1) The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley.
2) The overall development of the land shall be designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall take into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof. 3) All site development plans which permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel shall, in addition to all other requirements, be subject to a condition which prohibits the sale of any existing or subsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley pursuant to Chapter

1.35 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code , in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.
(f) Section 9.240.330.(4)(d)(i) of the Jurupa Valley Mu nicipal Code provides that a site development permit application that requires the approval of a general plan amendment, a specific plan amendment, or a change of zone shall be heard in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.285.040, as discussed in Paragraphs (b)-(d) of Section 3 of this Resolution, and all of the procedural requirements and rights of appeal as set forth therein shall govern the hearing. (g) Section 9.05.110 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that notwithstanding any other provisions of this title, in the event that a project requires a general plan amendment, zone change, specific plan amendment, development agreement or other legislative action in addition to the tentative subdivision map, site development permit, conditional u se permit, variance or other quasi -judicial land use applications for the project, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council to approve, modify or deny the applications for the legislative action for the project and a recommendation to the City Council to approve, conditionally approve or deny the quasi-judicial land use applications. The Council shall hear the applications for the legislative actions along with the applicable procedures of Section

Section 5. Tentative Tract Map.
-4-
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 38151, a Schedule “A” subdivision of approximately 6.92 acre into thirty-five (35) single-family lots , common areas, private streets, and a retention basin, collectively all on real property located at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN: 183-030-014).
(b) Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designat ed as the “Advisory Agency” charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed tentative Schedule “A” maps. Further, Sections 7.05.020.A. and 7.15.150 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provide that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
(c) Section 7.15.130.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code pro vides that within fifty (50) days after the date of filing of a commercial parcel map, a public hearing on the map must be held before the Planning Commission. Section 7.15.130.B. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after the close of the he aring, the Planning Commission must approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the proposed tentative map, file notice of the decision with the City Clerk, and mail notice of the decision to the land divider, or his or her authorized agent, and any interested party requesting a copy. (d) Section 9.05.110 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that notwithstanding any other provisions of this title, in the event that a project requires a general plan amendment, zone change, specific plan amendment, development agreement or other legislative action in addition to the tentative subdivision map, site development permit, conditional use permit, variance or other quasi -judicial land use applications for the project, the Planning Commission shall make a re commendation to the City Council to approve, modify , or deny the applications for the legislative action for the project and a recommendation to the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the quasi-judicial land use applications. The Council shall hear the applications for the legislative actions along with the applicable procedures of Section

9.05.100. The decision of the City Council shall be made by ordinance or resolution as required by law and shall require three (3) affirmative votes of the City Council. The purpose of this section is to enable the City Council to hear and decide all of the land use entitlements for a project in a comprehensive and coordinated manner.
(e) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires den ial of a Tentative Tract map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
-5-
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. 7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantial ly equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Sect ion 21000 et seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other consideration s make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Section 6. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 21143 was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and Jurupa Valley Ordinances. (b) On October 12, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 21143, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and adopted Resolution No. 2022-10-12-01 recommending that the City Council approve MA No. 21143. (c) On November 17, 2022, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 21143, at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following the receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing. (d) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 7. California Environmental Q uality Act Findings and Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program , Attached as Exhibit “ B”. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:
-6-

(a) Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Cal. Pub.

Res. Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq.), City staff prepared an Initia l Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Project as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that Study, City staff determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) was prepared by the City in full compliance with CEQA.
(b) Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment peri od and of the intent to adopt the MND as required by law. The public comment period commenced on September 9, 2022, and expired on September 28, 2022. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at City Hall, 8930 Limonit e Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509. The City did not receive any comments during the public review period. (c) The City Council has reviewed the MND and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”), attached as Exhibit “B” to this Resolution, and all comments received regarding the MND and, based on the whole record before it, finds that:
1) The MND was prepared in compliance with CEQA;
2) With the incorporation of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and 3) The MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council.
(d) Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the MND and MMRP for the Project.
(e) The Community Development Director is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA.

Section 8. Findings for Approval of General Plan Amendment . The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that General Plan Amendment No. 21003 should be adopted because:
(a) The density of the proposed Project (5.1 du/ac) is consistent with the proposed Medium High Density Residential (M HDR) land use designation for the Project site, which permits up to eight (8) dwelling units per acre (du/ac). (b) General Plan Amendment No. 21003 is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.4. (“Housing Quality and Variety”) of the 2017 Jurupa Valley General Plan because redesignating the Project site from Light Agriculture (A-1) Zone to Planned Residential (R-4) Zone will provide additional variety of housing types and density to the City. Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.4 states : “Accommodate the development of a variety of highest quality housing types, styles and densities that are acce ssible to and meet the needs of a range of lifestyles, physical abilities, and income levels.”
-7-
(c) General Plan Amendment No. 21003 is consistent with Land Use Element Policy LUE 2. 9. (“Design Compatibility” ) and Housing Element Policy HE 1.1.20. (“Mixed Housing Types and Densities”) of the 2017 Jurupa Valley General Plan because redesignating the Project site will comply with the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards creating an entry level traditional single family neighborhood with various architectural styles, tree lined streets, generous front yard landscaping, open space, and recreational amenities that are not often found in a typical tract home development. Land Use Element Policy LUE 2.9 states: “Ensure that new residential developments are design ed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures. ” Housing Element Policy HE

1.1.20. states: “Encourage residential development proposals to provide a range of housing types and densities for all income levels, including market rate housing, using creative planning concepts such as traditional neighborhood design, planned unit developments, area and specific plans, and mixed-use development.”
Section 9. Findings for Approval of Wavier of Minimum Nine-Acre Area Development Standard. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that the waiver of the minimum nine-acre area development standard should be approved because:
(a) The Project offers a unique opportunity to develop an entry level traditional single-family neighborhood with various architectural styles, tree lined streets, generous front yard landscaping, open space, and recreational amenities that are not often found in a typical residential subdivision development.
(b) The Project meets all of the other applicable development standards of the Planned Residential (R-4) Zone and the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards within in the

6.92 acre Project site.

Section 10. Findings for Approval of Site Development Permit. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that Site Development Permit No. 22089 should be approved because:
(a) The proposed use will conform to all the requirements of the 2017 Jurupa Valley General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 21003. (b) The proposed use will conform to all applicable requirements of State law in that the Project will be designed to conform to all applicable requirements of State law as required by State law and conditions of approval.
(c) The proposed use will conform to all applicable requirements of the ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley. The Project site is currently zoned Light Agriculture (A- 1). The proposed Project includes an application for a Change of Zone from Light Agriculture (A- 1) Zone to Planned Residential (R-4) Zone. The proposed development of thirty-five (35) single- family residential buildings is an allowed use in the Planned Residential (R-4) Zone, subject to the Traditional Neighborhood Development Standards set forth in Section 9.240.5 50 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
(d) The proposed overall development of the land, as demonstrated in the Project site plan(s), is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. -8-
The combination of the site design, building design, compliance with all applicable development standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval will ensure that the proposed Project is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. (e) The proposed overall development of the land is designed to conform to the logical development of the land in that the proposed Project is consistent with existing single- family neighborhoods surrounding the Project site.
(f) The proposed overall development of the land is designed to be compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The proposed Project site offers a unique opportunity to develop an entry level traditional single-family neighborhood with various architectural styles, tree lined streets, generous front yard landscaping, open space, and recreational amenities that are not often found in a typical tract home development. The proposed Project meets all of the applicable development standards of the Planned Residential (R- 4) Zone and the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards within in the 6.92-acre Project site. (g) The proposed site development plans consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion in that it includes public right-of-way improvements along Camino Real, and sufficient on-site pedestrian and vehicular access, and vehicular parking. (h) The proposed site development plan s take into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof in that t opographical and drainage conditions have been addressed through an approved Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan and the proposed conditions of approval recommended by the City’s Engineering Department.
(i) The proposed site development plans do not permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel. The proposed Project has been conditioned to prohibit the Applicant from selling any constructed structures until the parcel on which the buildings are located is divided and a final map is recorded.

Section 11. Findings for Approval of Tentative Tract Map. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds determines and declares that the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 38151 should be granted because:
(a) The proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 38151 meets all requirements of Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. (b) The proposed land division is consistent with the City’s General Plan , including policies for the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) land use designation, which permits up to eight (8) dwelling units per acre. The proposed land division will facilitate the future construction of thirty-five (35) single-family homes at a density of 5.1 dwelling units per acre , which is below the maximum allowable density.
(c) The design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with the City’s General Plan and, with the approval of waiver of the minimum nine -acre area development standard and Change of Zone No. 21004, all proposed parcels will meet all applicable -9-
development standards for premises in the Planned Residenti al ( R-4) Zone as well as the Traditional Neighborhood Design development standards. Additionally, the Development Plan meets the criteria within the Planned Residential (R-4) Zone. (d) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable to accommodate the subdivision and future development of thirty-five (35) single-family residential homes as there is adequate water and sewer connections and public services are available to the Project site. Kirby Drive will be restricted to emergency vehicles on ly and existing residents to the south and west.

Kirby Drive will also be improved with a 24-foot pavement section and a 4-foot easterly parkway to include curb adjacent landscaping and curb and gutter. Camino Real will be improved with a 77-foot pavement section and an 18-foot westerly parkway to include curb adjacent landscaping, 5-foot sidewalk, and curb and gutter. The Intersection of Camino Real (NS) and proposed “C” Street (EW) will be full access into and out of the P roject site. Northboun d Camino Real will include one through lane and one left -turn lane into “C” Street. Southbound Camino Real will include one through lane and one right-turn lane into “C” Street. “C” Street will also include one shared right-turn and left-turn lane.
(e) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development in that it proposes thirty-five (35) single-family residential dwelling units at a density of 5.1 dwelling units per acre, which is below the maximum allow able density under the General Plan designation.
(f) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fi sh or wildlife or their habitat. An Initial Study was prepared that evaluated potential effects with respect to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities and Service Systems.

An MND prepared for the proposed Project determined that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been required or revisions in the Project have been made or agreed to by the Applicant. The Initial Study determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project may have a significant effect on the environment. As such, the proposed P roject will not cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (g) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. An Initial Study was prepared that evaluated potential effects with respect to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities and Service Systems. An MND prepared for the proposed Project determined that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures have been required or revisions in the Project have been made or agreed to by the Applicant. The Initial Study determined that, with the -10-
incorporation of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project may have a significant effect on the environment. As such, the proposed Project will not cause serious public health problems.
(h) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division . There are no easements on Project site that the development would be in conflict with. The proposed Project will connect to existing water and sewer lines and all proposed utilities will be required to be undergrounded.

Section 12. Approval of Master Application No. 21143 with Conditions. (a) The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Master Application No. 21143 (General Plan Amendment No. 21003, Waiver of Minimum Nine -Acre Area Development Standard, Site Development Permit No. 22 089, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38151) to permit a Schedule “A” subdivision of approximately 6.92 acres into thirty-five (35) single-family lots, common areas, private streets, and a retention basin, collectively all on real property located at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN: 183 -030-014), subject to the conditions of approv al attached hereto as Exhibit “C”.
(b) The City Council’s approval of the waiver of the minimum nine -acre area development standard shall become null and void upon the following: t he proposed development project has changed substantially from the approved conceptual development project of the waiver application.
(c) The City Council’s approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 38151 shall not be effective until the effective date of the ordinance adopting Change of Zone No. 21004.

Section 13. Certification. The Community Development Director shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 17th day of November, 2022.
______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-11-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-109 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 17th day of November, 2022, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 17th day of November, 2022. ___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Exhibit 1A:

General Plan Amendment Exhibit

Exhibit 1B:

Change of Zone Exhibit

Exhibit 1C:

Mitigated Negative Declaration with Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) -
(Available on the City's website page under
Development Services/Planning/Environmental
Reports at
https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/View/23
93/
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)Initial Study/Mitigated Negative DeclarationMadone Collection Planned Residential Development City of Jurupa Valley Master Application MA 21143Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38151General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21003Change of Zone (CZ) No. 21004 Lead AgencyCity of Jurupa Valley8930 Limonite Avenue Jurupa Valley, CA 92509Contact: Thomas Gorham, Principal Planner(951) 332-6464 ext. 215 [email protected] ByErnest PereaCity of Jurupa Valley, CEQA [email protected]:TK Management Services, L.L.C.Kevin Kent449 W. Foothill Blvd. #104Glendora, CA 91741(626) 808-5067September 09, 2022

MA21143 Madone Project
i
Table of Contents 1.0 FINDING......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration........................................ 2 2.2 Environmental Impacts Requiring Mitigation................................................................. 2 2.3 Public Review of the Document ..................................................................................... 3 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING......................................................... 4 3.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Proposed Improvements ................................................................................................ 4 3.4 Construction and Operational Characteristics ............................................................... 5 3.5 Environmental Setting .................................................................................................... 7 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 8 4.1 Aesthetics ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Agriculture Resources ................................................................................................ 12 4.3 Air Quality .................................................................................................................. 14 4.4 Biological Resources ................................................................................................... 24 4.5 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................... 32 4.6 Energy ........................................................................................................................ 38 4.7 Geology and Soils ....................................................................................................... 40 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................ 47 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................. 51 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................................................................... 55 4.11 Land Use and Planning............................................................................................... 61 4.12 Mineral Resources ..................................................................................................... 62 4.13 Noise .......................................................................................................................... 63 4.14 Population and Housing............................................................................................. 69 4.15 Public Services ............................................................................................................ 70 4.16 Recreation .................................................................................................................. 74 4.17 Transportation ............................................................................................................ 75 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................ 80 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ..................................................................................... 84 4.20 Wildfire ...................................................................................................................... 89 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance........................................................................... 915.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM............................................ M-1 MA21143 Madone Project
ii
Figures3-1 Vicinity Location Map/Aerial Photo........................................................................... 6 3-2 Lot Layout ................................................................................................................... 6 4.12-1 Noise Measurement Locations................................................................................ 644.19-1 JCSD Water Supply vs Maximum Daily Demand 2019-2024................................... 86Tables 2.1 Summary of Environmental Impacts Requiring Mitigation ......................................... 2 3.1 Land Uses/General Plan Designations, and Zoning Classifications ............................. 7 4.3-1 South Coast Air Quality Management District Regional Significance Thresholds ..... 15 4.3-2 Attainment Status Of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin..................... 154.3-3 Summary of Peak Construction Emissions ............................................................... 214.3-4 Summary of Peak Operational Air Emissions ............................................................ 224.3-5 Maximum Daily Localized Emissions Thresholds....................................................... 234.3-6 Summary of Localized Significance Construction Emissions..................................... 244.3-7 Summary Localized Significance Operational Emissions .......................................... 24 4.4-1 MSHCP Consistency Analysis ..................................................................................... 31 4.8-1 Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................... 48 4.8-2 Consistency with GHG Reduction Measures ............................................................. 50 4.13-1 24-Hour Ambient Noise Levels at Receiver Locations ............................................. 64 4.13-2 Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels ......................................................... 65 4.13-3 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment .............................................. 68 4.17-1 Base Year City and Project VMT Summary ............................................................... 76 4.17-2 Cumulative Year City and Project VMT Summary .................................................... 76 4.17-3 VMT Reduction ......................................................................................................... 78 4.19-1 Capacity of Landfills Serving Jurupa Valley .............................................................. 88 4.19-2 Project Waste Generation Compared to Landfill Daily Throughput ........................ 88AppendicesAvailable online at: https://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/Index/68Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimate Tables for the TTM No. 38151 Madone Collections, LSA, October 5, 2021 Appendix B Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis and Biology Report, LSA Associates, Inc., October, 2021 Appendix C Cultural Resources Assessment, TTM NO. 38151 Madone Collections, LSA Associates, Inc., dated October 2021 Appendix D Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Water Infiltration Test Report, Converse Consultants, April 22, 2021 Appendix EPreliminary Drainage Study; Encompass Associates, Inc., May 6, 2021 Appendix F Preliminary WQMP, Encompass Associates, Inc; April 30, 2021. Appendix GWater and Sewer Will Serve Letter, Jurupa Community Services District, October 25, 2021 Appendix HNoise and Vibration Impact Analysis, prepared by LSA, dated October 5, 2021. Appendix I TTM No. 38151 Madone Collection (MA21143) Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, LSA Associates, Inc., dated August 28, 2022 Appendix J VMT Mitigation Workbook Madone Collection Residential Project, City of Jurupa Valley, dated August 25, 2022 MA21143 Madone Project
1 1.0 FindingBased on this initial evaluation:I find that the proposed use COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be recommended for adoption.I find that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project Applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be recommended for adoption.I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets if the effect is a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated.” An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effect (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, pursuant to all applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required.City of Jurupa ValleySignatureAgencyJoe Perez, Community Development DirectorSeptember 09, 2022Printed Name/Title Date MA21143 Madone Project
2 2.0-Introduction 2.1-Purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that, for a project that is not exempt from CEQA, a preliminary analysis of the proposed project be conducted to determine whether a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared for the project. This preliminary analysis is called an “Initial Study.” Based on the Initial Study prepared for this Project, the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department is recommending that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted for this Project by the City Council. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is a written statement by the City that the Initial Study identified potentially significant environmental effects of the Project, but the Project is revised or mitigation measures are required to eliminate or mitigate impacts to less than significant levels. 2.2- Environmental Impacts Requiring Mitigation Table 2-1 identifies the environmental impacts that require mitigation. All other topics either have “No Impact” or a “Less than Significant Impact” as identified throughout this Initial Study. Table 2.1 Summary of Environmental Impacts Requiring MitigationEnvironmental Topic SectionDescription of ImpactMitigation Measure4.4 (a) Biological Resources Grading and Vegetation removal may impact nesting birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Burrowing Owl, Bat population, and Crotch Bumble Bee. BIO-1: . Burrowing Owl Protection. 30-day preconstruction burrowing owl survey is required BIO-2: Nesting Bird Protection. Vegetation clearing and ground disturbance shall be prohibited during the migratory bird nesting season (February 1 through October 1), unless a migratory bird nesting survey is completed 4.5 (b) Cultural Resources Sub-surface archaeological resources may be encountered during ground disturbance. CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring is required. CR-2: Archaeological Treatment Plan. If resource is significant, an archaeological treatment plan is required. CR-2: Final Report4.7 (f) Geology and Soils Sub-surface archaeological resources may be encountered during ground disturbance. GEO-1: Paleontological Inadvertent Discovery. Stop work and resource to be evaluated by a Paleontologist. GEO-2: Paleontological Treatment Plan. If resource is MA21143 Madone Project
3 Environmental Topic SectionDescription of ImpactMitigation Measuresignificant, a paleontological treatment plan is required.4.13 (a) NoiseConstruction noise will impact adjacent residences. NOI-1: Requires construction noise mitigation measure notes be placed on grading plans.4.17 ( ) Transportation Developments impact on increase traffic volumes.VMT-1: Electrical Vehicle ChargingVMT-2:Sidewalk ConnectionsVMT-3: High Destination Accessibility VMT-4: Traffic Calming and Safety Measures VMT-5: Improve Transit (Bus Shelter4.18 (b) Tribal Cultural Resources Sub-surface tribal cultural resources may be encountered during ground disturbance. TCR-1 through TCR-3 Requires monitoring during ground disturbance and treatment plan if significant resources are found.4.19 (a) Utilities and Service Systems Undergrounding of utilities and service systems may impact Biological, Cultural, Paleontological, Tribal Cultural Resources, and generate excessive noise.Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-2, CR-1, CR-2, CR-3, GEO-1, GEO-2, NOI-1, VMT-1 through VMT-5and TCR 1 through TCR-3 are required. A more detailed description of the mitigation measures can be found in Section 5.0-Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Programof this document. 2.3 -Public Review of the Document This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Notice of Intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration was distributed to the following entities for a 20-day public review period. 1) Direct mailing (or emailed) to owners or occupants of contiguous property and organizations and individuals who have previously requested such notice in writing to the City of Jurupa Valley; 2) Responsible and trustee agencies (public agencies that have a level of discretionary approval over some component of the proposed Project); and3) The Riverside County Clerk.According to CEQA Guidelines §15204(b), in reviewing this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, persons and public agencies should focus on the proposed finding that the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. If persons and public agencies believe that the Project may have a significant effect, they should: 1) Identify the specific effect, 2) Explain why they believe the effect would occur, and 3) Explain why they believe the effect would be significant.

MA21143 Madone Project
4 Comments are to be submitted to: City of Jurupa Valley8930 Limonite AvenueJurupa Valley, CA 92509Contact: Thomas Gorham, Principal Planner(951) [email protected] Description/Environmental Setting 3.1 – Project Location The Project site is located on approximately 6.92 acres at 7586 Jurupa Road. The site is located on the south side of Jurupa Road, with Camino Real to the east, Camino Real Elementary School to the south, residential uses to the west and northeast, and Patriot High School to the northwest. The Project site is identified by the following Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 183-030-014. (See Figure 3.1-Vicinity Location Map and Aerial Photoand Figure 3.2- Lot Layout ). 3.2 -Project Description General Plan Amendment (GPA) 21003and Change of Zone (CZ) No. 21004 The Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MHDR (Medium High Density Residential), a change of zone (CZ) from A-1 (Light Agriculture) to R-4 (Planned Development) and a tentative tract map to subdivide 6.92acres into 35 lots for single-family detached houses. The Project will include recreational area park, dog park, walking trails, exercise stations, tot lot, Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The R-4 zone allows for lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 6,000 square-feet for each dwelling unit and a minimum lot area of 3,500 square-feet. 3.3-Proposed Improvements Street Improvements and Access Internal StreetsProposed internal streets will be private roads. Dedication at entrance to accommodate public improvements will be required (i.e., curb ramps). Camino Real Camino Real improvement recommendations include: North Bound: One 12-foot-wide left turn lane, one 12-foot wide through lane, one 13-foot through lane/right turn lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road).

MA21143 Madone Project
5 South Bound: One 13-foot wide through lane, one 12-foot wide through lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road).6-foot-wide raised median for future UPRR gate assembly.18-foot-wide west parkway.Water and Sewer Improvements Water ServiceThe Project will connect to the existing water service available from both the existing 18-inch waterline in Camino Real, an existing 8-inch waterline in Kirby Drive, or existing 12-inch and 24-inch waterlines north of Jurupa Road. Sewer Service The Project will connect to the existing sewer service available from the 8-inch diameter sewer line in Kirby Road. Storm Drainage Improvements The Project’s drainage plan includes a series of storm drains and pipes which divert storm water to an underground water quality and storm infiltration basin located at the southwest corner of the site, the infiltration basin with overflow to the existing flood control storm drain south of the property. 3-4- Construction and Operational Characteristics Construction Construction of the Project is expected to take approximately 42 months (3.5 years). Estimated earthwork quantities include 4,000 cubic yards raw cut, 15,000 cubic yards raw fill, and approximately 11,000 cubic yards of soil import. Heavy equipment used for grading is estimated to require 1 excavator, 1 grader, 1 rubber tired dozer, and 3 tractors/loaders/backhoes. Heavy equipment used for building construction is estimated to require 1 crane, 3 forklifts, 3 tractors/loaders/backhoes, 1 generator set, and 1 welder. During all phases of construction, all construction equipment and materials storage would occur within the Project site. No off-site staging area for trucks or equipment would be required during construction activities. To avoid or minimize temporary construction-related traffic impacts throughout site preparation and construction activities, the Project Applicant would be required to prepare and implement a City-approved construction traffic management plan. OperationsTypical operations include vehicle trips from residents, visitors, and service and delivery vehicles and the operation of lawnmowers, leaf blowers, and maintenance equipment associated with single family residential neighborhoods.

MA21143 Madone Project
6 Figure 3.1- Vicinity Location Map/Aerial Photo
Figure 3.2- Lot Layout

MA21143 Madone Project
7 3.5-Environmental SettingCEQA Guidelines §15125 establishes requirements for defining the environmental setting to which the environmental effects of a proposed project must be compared. The environmental setting is defined as “…the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time the Notice of Preparation is published, or if no Notice of Preparation is published, at the time the environmental analysis is commenced…” (CEQA Guidelines §15125[a]). Because a Notice of Preparation was not required, the environmental setting for the Project is May 2021, which is the date that the Project’s environmental analysis commenced. The Project site is highly disturbed due to continued disking and its urban residential setting, as well as a recent brush fire that occurred on the northern portion of the site. As a result of the disturbance by the crop production and disking, the vegetation on the project site is sparse and ruderal in nature. Vegetation communities on the site consists of ruderal disturbed vegetation and nonnative grasslands.Dominant species within ruderal disturbed vegetation include Australian saltbush (Atriplex semibaccata), Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus), and mouse barley (Hordeum murinum). This includes areas recently burned in a brush fire. This land cover was the most abundant vegetation/land cover present on the site and occurs throughout most of the site. Dominant species within nonnative grassland areas include mouse barley, Australian saltbush, ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), and smilo grass (Stipa miliacea var. miliacea). This vegetation community was present throughout the southern portion of the project site. Onsite and adjacent land uses, General Plan land use designations, and zoning classifications are shown in Table 3.1. Table 3.1: Land Uses, General Plan Land Use Designations, and Zoning ClassificationsLocationCurrentLand Use General Plan Land Use Designation ZoningSite Vacant land LDR (Country Neighborhood) A-1 (Light Agriculture) North Union Pacific RailroadJurupa Road Patriot High School ResidentialLDR (Country Neighborhood) PF (Public Facilities/Institutional) MDR (Medium Density Residential) R-A-20000 (Residential Agriculture – 20000 sq. ft.) R-1 (Single Family Detached) A-1 (Light Agriculture) South Camino Real Elementary School LDR (Country Neighborhood) A-1 (Light Agriculture) East Camino Real Centennial Park LDR (Country Neighborhood) A-1 (Light Agriculture) West Residential LDR (Country Neighborhood) A-1 (Light Agriculture) R-A (Residential Agriculture) Source: Field inspection, City of Jurupa Valley-General Plan Land Use Map August 2022, Google Earth Pro.

MA21143 Madone Project
8 4.0-Environmental Analysis The Project is evaluated based on its potential effect on twenty-one (21) environmental topics. Each of the above environmental topics are analyzed by responding to a series of questions pertaining to the impact of the Project on the particular topic. Based on the results of the Impact Analysis, the effects of the Project are then placed in one of the following four categories, which are each followed by a summary to substantiate the factual reasons why the impact was placed in a certain category. Significant or potentially significant impact(s) have been identified or anticipated that cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. An Environmental Impact Report must therefore be prepared. Potentially significant impact(s) have been identified or anticipated, but mitigation is possible to reduce the impact(s) to a less than significant category. Mitigation measures must then be identified. No “significant” impact(s) identified or anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation is necessary. No impact(s) identified or anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation is necessary. Throughout the impact analysis in this Initial Study, reference is made to the following:Plans, Policies, Programs (PPP) These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project based on the basis of federal, state, or local law currently in place which effectively reduce environmental impacts. If applicable, they will be identified in the Analysis section for each topic.Mitigation Measures (MM) These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts. Mitigation measures are proposed to reduce impacts to less than significant levels in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. If applicable to the analysis for a certain environmental topic, Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)were assumed and accounted for in the assessment of impacts for each issue area. Mitigation Measures were formulated only for those issue areas where the results of the impact analysis identified significant impacts. Both types of measures described above will be required to be implemented as part of the Project if so, indicated in the analysis.

Potentially Significant or Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact MA21143 Madone Project
9 4.1 Aesthetics Threshold 4.1 (a). Would the Project: PotentiallySignificant or Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant ImpactNo ImpactHave a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, and ProgramsPPP 4.1-1As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal Code sections 9.100.010, a development plan (called R-4 Zone - Planned Residential) that includes, but is not limited to, development standards for structures, pedestrian walks, recreation and other open areas, walls, landscaping, and plans and elevations of typical structures to indicate architectural type and construction standards.PPP 4.1-2As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal Code section 7.50.010, all utilities serving and within the Project site shall be placed underground unless exempted by this section.The City’s General Plan defines scenic vistas as “points or corridors that are accessible to the public and that provide a view of scenic areas and/or landscapes.” Specifically, the City identifies publicly accessible vantage points of the Santa Ana River, Jurupa Mountains, and the Pedley Hills as scenic vistas1. From the Project site, the Santa Ana River is located approximately 2.5 miles south, the Jurupa Mountains are located approximately 0.90 miles north, and the Pedley Hills are located approximately 1 mile southwest. The Project site provides limited views of the Jurupa Mountains and Pedley Hills.PPP 4.1-1and 4.2-2above will limit building height and provide building setbacks between structures that would serve to limit blocking the existing views. Views of the Santa Ana River are not available because of intervening development, and topography. Based on the preceding analysis, public views of a scenic vista would not be significantly or permanently blocked with implementation of the Project. 1 General Plan pps. 1-17 to 1-19.

MA21143 Madone Project
10 Threshold 4.1 (b). Would the Project:PotentiallySignificant or Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impactwith Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No ImpactSubstantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Impact AnalysisAccording to the California Department of Transportation, the Project site is not located along a State scenic highway2. Additionally, no trees, rock outcroppings, historic buildings or other kinds of scenic resources of significant value are located on the Project site. As such, there is no impact. In addition, according to the General Plan, the Project site is not located within or adjacent to a scenic corridor or roadway3. Threshold 4.1 (c). Would the Project: PotentiallySignificant or Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with MitigationLess Than Significant Impact No Impact If located in an Urbanized Area, conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Impact AnalysisAccording to Census 2010, the Project site is in the Riverside-San Bernardino, CA Urbanized Area4. As such, the Project is subject to the City’s applicable regulations governing scenic quality.Plans, Policies, and ProgramsThe following apply to the Project and would help reduce impacts related to scenic quality. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:PPP 4.1-1 and PPP 4.1-2shall apply.The Planning Department has reviewed the Madone Collection Development Plansubmitted by the Applicant and determined that all applicable design and development standards have been met. 2California Department of Transportation, State Scenic Highway Program, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways, accessed August, 2022. 3City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-23: Jurupa Valley scenic corridors and roadways 4 United States Census Bureau, 2010 Census Urban Area Reference Maps, https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-maps/2010/geo/2010-census-urban-areas.html, accessed August, 2022.

MA21143 Madone Project
11 With implementation of PPP 4.1-1and 4.1-2, the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Threshold 4.1 (d). Would the project:PotentiallySignificant or SignificantImpactLess Than Significant Impact with MitigationLess Than Significant ImpactNo ImpactCreate a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The following apply to the Project and would help reduce impacts related to light and glare. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:PPP 4.1-3 All outdoor lighting shall be designed and installed to comply with California Green Building Standard Code Section 5.106 or with a local ordinance lawfully enacted pursuant to California Green Building Standard Code Section 101.7, whichever is more stringent.Outdoor Lighting and Glare The Project would increase the amount of light in the area above what is being generated by the vacant site by directly adding new sources of illumination including security and decorative lighting for the proposed structures. With implementation of PPP 4.1-3and compliance with the City’s Design Guidelines, impacts relating to light and glare are less than significant. Building Material Glare The primary exterior of the future structures will be typical of single-family detached housing and consist of non-reflective materials including stucco exterior and tile or metal roofing materials. Therefore, potential glare from the proposed Project is considered to be less than significant.

MA21143 Madone Project
12 4.2 Agriculture Resources Note: Because there are no forestry resources located in the City of Jurupa, the topic of Forestry Resources is not addressed. Threshold 4.2 (a) Would the project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Impact AnalysisThe Project site is designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” by the State Department ofConservation5. The Project site does not contain any lands designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as mapped by the State Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. In addition, no properties abutting the Project site are classified as Farmland. The City of Jurupa Valley’s General Plan considers agricultural land to be an appropriate use of land until such time as a property owner considers farming to be no longer economically viable which is why the General Plan designates agricultural land for eventual suburban and urban uses. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the conversion of any Farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore, there are no impacts. Threshold 4.2 (b) Would the project: Potentially Significantor Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less ThanSignificant Impact NoImpact Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Impact AnalysisAgricultural ZoningThe current land use for the site is Country Neighborhood and zoning classification for the site isA-1 (Light Agriculture). The County Neighborhood designation and the A-1 zoning classification n 5California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, https://databasin.org/datasets/b83ea1952fea44ac9fc62c60dd57fe48 , accessed August 30, 2022.

MA21143 Madone Project
13 is intended single-family residential on larger lots or for limited agricultural uses. The primary agricultural land use designations in the City are Small Farm (RR) and Ranch (EDR). The primary agricultural zones are A-2 (Heavy Agriculture), and A-D (Agriculture-Dairy). Based on this, the site is not considered a primary agricultural zone.The site is currently not being used for agricultural purposes. The Project is proposing a change of zone to R-4 (Planned Residential). The R-4 Zone is intended to allow development of subdivisions containing open areas that will be used for recreation purposes and is not considered a primary agriculture zone. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use.Williamson Act A Williamson Act Contract enables private landowners to voluntarily enter contracts with local governments for the purpose of establishing agricultural preserves. According to the County of Riverside Map My County (RCIT), the site is not within an agricultural preserve.6Existing surrounding uses include Patriot High School and residential development to the north, Camino Real Elementary School and residential development to the south, residential to the west and Centennial Park and residential to the to the east. Since the Project site does not have any current agricultural use and is not identified as farmland, implementation of the proposed Project will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. The Project therefore will have no impacts on existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. Threshold 4.2 (c) Would the project: Potentially Significant or Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Impact AnalysisThe Project site is located in an area largely characterized by a mix of residential and schooldevelopments. There is no land being used primarily for agricultural purposes in the vicinity of the site; therefore, development of the site would not convert existing farmland to non-agricultural uses. 6Riverside County Map My County (RCIT), Planning Layers Agricultural Preserves https://gis1.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC_Public, accessed August 31, 2022.

MA21143 Madone Project
14 4.3 Air Quality The following analysis is based in part on the following technical memo: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimate Tables for the TTM No. 38151 Madone Collections, LSA dated October 5, 2021, Appendix A to this Initial Study. Background Air Pollutants Air Pollutants are the amounts of foreign and/or natural substances occurring in the atmosphere that may result in adverse effects to humans, animals, vegetation and/or materials. The Air Pollutants regulated by the SCAQMD are described below.7Carbon Monoxide (CO). A colorless, odorless gas resulting from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels. Over 80 percent of the CO emitted in urban areas is contributed by motor vehicles. Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a byproduct of fuel combustion. The principal form of nitrogen oxide produced by combustion is nitric oxide (NO), but NO reacts quickly to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2commonly called NOx. Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 and PM10): One type of particulate matter is the soot seen in vehicle exhaust. Fine particles — less than one-tenth the diameter of a human hair — pose a serious threat to human health, as they can penetrate deep into the lungs. PM can be a primary pollutant or a secondary pollutant from hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxides. Diesel exhaust is a major contributor to PM pollution. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). A strong smelling, colorless gas that is formed by the combustion of fossil fuels. Power plants, which may use coal or oil high in sulfur content, can be major sources of SO2. Ozone: Ozone is formed when several gaseous pollutants react in the presence of sunlight. Most of these gases are emitted from vehicle tailpipe emissions.Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): VOCs contribute to the formation of smog and/or may themselves be toxic. VOCs often have an odor and some examples include gasoline, alcohol and the solvents used in paints.Federal and State Air Quality StandardsUnder the federal Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establishes health-based air quality standards for the above-described air pollutants that all states must achieve. The California Clean Air Act also establishes requirements for cities and counties to meet.South Coast Air Quality Management District Standards 7 http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality MA21143 Madone Project
15 South Coast AQMD was created by the state legislature to facilitate compliance with the federal Clean Air Act and to implement the state air quality program. Toward that end, South Coast AQMD develops regulations designed to achieve these public health standards by reducing emissions from business and industry.The City of Jurupa Valley is located within the South Coast Air Basin which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast AQMD. Table 4.3-1 describes the regional significance thresholds established by the South Coast AQMD to meet national and state air quality standards.Table 4.3-1: South Coast Air Quality Management District Regional Significance ThresholdsPollutant Emissions (Construction)(pounds/day)Emissions (Operational) (pounds/day)NOx 100 55 VOC 75 55 PM10 150 150 PM2.5 55 55 SOx 150 150 CO 550 550 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Significance Thresholds, March 2015. Attainment Designation An “attainment” designation for an area signifies that criteria pollutant concentrations did not exceed the established standard. In contrast to attainment, a “nonattainment” designation indicates that a criteria pollutant concentration has exceeded the established standard. Table 4.3-2 shows the attainment status of criteria pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). Table 4.3-2- Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air BasinCriteria PollutantState DesignationFederal DesignationOzone – 1-hour standard Nonattainment No Standard Ozone – 8-hour standard Nonattainment Nonattainment Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10)Nonattainment Attainment Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Nonattainment Nonattainment Carbon Monoxide (CO) Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Nitrogen Dioxide (N0x) Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Unclassified /Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Lead Attainment Attainment Source: California Air Resources Board, 2015.

MA21143 Madone Project
16 Threshold 4.3 (a). Would the Project:PotentiallySignificantImpact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactConflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Impact AnalysisThe South Coast Air Quality Management District is required to produce air quality management plans directing how the South Coast Air Basin’s air quality will be brought into attainment with the national and state ambient air quality standards. The most recent air quality management plan is 2016 Air Quality Management Plan8 and it is applicable to City of Jurupa Valley. The purpose of the plan is to achieve and maintain both the national and state ambient air quality standards described above. In order to determine if a project is consistent with the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, the South Coast Air Quality Management District has established consistency criterion which are defined in Chapter 12, Sections 12.2 and 12.3 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook and are discussed below.Consistency Criterion No. 1: The proposed project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan.Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers to violations of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards and National Ambient Air Quality Standards. As evaluated under Issues 4.3.3 (b) below, the Project would not exceed regional or localized significance thresholds for any criteria pollutant during construction or during long-term operation. Accordingly,the Project is determined to be consistent with the first criterion.Consistency Criterion No. 2: The proposed project will not exceed the assumptions in the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Consistency with 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) The SCAQMD adopted the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in March 2017. The growth assumptions used in the AQMP to project future air quality emissions levels are based on the projections of the Regional Transportation Model utilized by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which incorporates land use data provided by lead agency general plan documentation, as well as assumptions regarding population number, location of 8 http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan MA21143 Madone Project
17 population growth, and a regional housing needs assessment. When the 2016 RTP/SCS and the 2016 AQMP were prepared, the General Plan Land Use designation for the Project site was Light Agriculture (A1), and this was the land use incorporated into the 2016 AQMP.This second AQMP consistency criterion requires that the proposed Project does not exceed the growth assumptions in the AQMP.The Project site is currently designated in the City General Plan as Country Neighborhood (LDR) and City zoning as Light Agriculture (A1). This designation allows a variety of residential and related uses that would generate housing and population growth. A General Plan Amendment and a Change of Zone are being proposed to change the land use/zoning designations of this property to Highest Density Residential (HHDR), which would allow for development of multi-family uses at a density of up to 25 dwelling units per acre. Current forecasts indicate that the SCAG region will experience a population growth of 7 percent between 2012 and 2023, with a 7 percent increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and a population growth of 12 percent by the year 2031 with an 8 percent increase in VMT.9Air emissions are categorized into the following categories:Stationary Sources: Stationary sources can be divided into two major subcategories: Point and Area sources. Point sources primarily consist of permitted facilities with one or more emission sources at an identified location (e.g., power plants, refineries). Area sources consist of many small emission sources (e.g., residential water heaters, architectural coatings, consumer products and permitted sources that are smaller than the above thresholds) which are distributed across the region and are not required to individually report their emissions. Typical stationary emissions sources result primarily from the combustion of fuels, evaporation of solvents or fuels, and processing of materials. Hence, stationary sources are grouped under fuel combustion, waste disposal, cleaning and surface coatings, petroleum production and marketing, industrial processes, solvent evaporation, and other miscellaneous processes. Mobile Sources: Mobile sources consist of two subcategories: on-road sources and off-road sources. On-road sources are primarily passenger cars, trucks, and buses. Off-road sources are locomotives, ocean going vessels, commercial harbor craft, pleasure craft and off-highway Recreational Vehicles, cargo handling equipment, farm equipment and aircraft.10. Under the current land use designation of Country Neighborhood, the primary emissions sources would be primarily from passenger car traffic. Under the proposed land use of R-4 the emissions sources would not change from passenger cars. 9 P 3-18 10 2016 AQMP, p. 3-2, 3-6.

MA21143 Madone Project
18 With respect to air emissions, an industrial development would have less overall emissions because it would generate fewer passenger car vehicle trips, which are a major source of emissions. For example, 208 multiple-family dwelling units would generate a total of 1,537 average daily trips compared to 857 average daily trips with a 218,000-square-foot industrial building used for general light manufacturing.11Even though the change in land use wouldincrease the air emissions, none of the South Coast AQMD thresholds are exceeded. As such, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the Final 2016 AQMP.Consistency with 2022 AQMPThe Draft 2022 AQMP has been prepared by SCAQMD and has been released for public review but has not yet been finalized or is under public review and is anticipated to be considered for adoption by either the SCAQMD o rand CARB as of the time of this writing in September 2022. Although the Project is not required to demonstrate consistency with the 2022 AQMP because it has not been adopted, the following analysis is provided for informational purposes in light of the probability it will be adopted in the near future. The Draft 2022 AQMP builds upon measures already in place from previous AQMPs and includes a variety of additional proposed strategies such as regulation, accelerated deployment of available cleaner technologies (e.g., zero emission technologies, when cost-effective and feasible, and low NOx technologies in other applications), best management practices, co- benefits from existing programs (e.g., climate and energy efficiency), incentives, and other CAA measures to achieve the 2015 8-hour ozone standard, which is the most stringent standard to date.The SCAG region is diverse and large, and the types and classifications of land use used by one jurisdiction often differ from those used by another. The result is that there are many different land use types and classifications that SCAG must organize for its own analyses. Given the number of square miles the SCAG region encompasses, SCAG developed a simplified series of Land Development Categories (LDCs) to represent the dominant themes taken from the region’s many General Plans. This was developed in order to facilitate regional modeling of land use information from nearly 200 distinct jurisdictions. The LDCs employed in the RTP/SCS are not intended to represent detailed land use policies, but are used to describe the general conditions likely to occur within a specific area if recently emerging trends, such as transit-oriented development, were to continue in concert with the implementation of the 2016 RTP/SCS. SCAG then classified the Place Types into three LDCs. The agency used these categories to describe the general conditions that exist and/or are likely to exist within a specific area. They reflect the varied conditions of buildings and roadways, transportation options, and the mix of housing and employment throughout the region. The three LDCs that SCAG used are: 1. Urban: These areas are often found within and directly adjacent to moderate and high-density urban centers. Nearly all urban growth in these areas would be considered infill or redevelopment. The majority of housing is multifamily and attached single-family (townhome), 11 ITE Land Use Code 140-Manufacturing.

MA21143 Madone Project
19 which tend to consume less water and energy than the larger types found in greater proportion in less urban locations. These areas are supported by high levels of regional and local transit service. They have well-connected street networks, and the mix and intensity of uses result in a highly walkable environment. These areas offer enhanced access and connectivity for people who choose not to drive or do not have access to a vehicle. 2. Compact:These areas are less dense than those in the Urban LDC, but they are highly walkable with a rich mix of retail, commercial, residential and civic uses. These areas are most likely to occur as new growth on the urban edge, or as large-scale redevelopment. They have a rich mix of housing, from multifamily and attached single-family (townhome) to small- and medium lot single-family homes. These areas are well served by regional and local transit service, but they may not benefit from as much service as urban growth areas and are less likely to occur around major multimodal hubs. Streets in these areas are well connected and walkable, and destinations such as schools, shopping and entertainment areas can typically be reached by walking, biking, taking transit, or with a short auto trip. 3. Standard: These areas comprise the majority of separate-use, auto-oriented developments that have characterized the American suburban landscape for decades. Densities in these areas tend to be lower than those in the Compact LDC, and they are generally not highly mixed. Medium and larger-lot single-family homes comprise the majority of this development form. Standard areas are not typically well served by regional transit service, and most trips are made by automobile.According to Exhibit 29, Forecasted Regional Development Types by Land Development Categories (2012)-Western Riverside County, the City of Jurupa Valley is classified as being within the Standard LDC.12Buildout of the Project is consistent with the Standard LDC and would not be greater than assumed by SCAG’s regional forecast projections and also the AQMP growth projections. In order to exceed the growth assumptions, the Project would have to increase the intensity of development to the degree it would result in the entire city to be reclassified to the Urban or Compact LDC. As detailed in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, the development of up 35 dwelling units would increase the City’s population by approximately 131 persons assuming all residents came from outside the City. (3.75 persons/du with 35 units). An increase of 131 in relation to the current population of 105,384 represents an increase of 0.13 % and would not induce substantial population growth. As such, the General Plan Amendment and zone change does not result in the site being considered as being in the Urban or Compact LDC for purposes of growth projections used for modeling air quality emission assumptions in the 2016 AQMP. As such, the Project is consistent with the growth projections in City of Jurupa Valley General Plan and is considered to be consistent with the proposed 2022 AQMP.12 https://planning.lacity.org/odocument/2a7e374a-5c53-4db8-8ea1-a75f12a73b31/Appendix_L_SCAGs_2016-2040_RTP_SCS_Background_Documentation.pdf MA21143 Madone Project
20 Threshold 4.3 (b). Would the Project:PotentiallySignificantImpact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactResult in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Regional Air Quality Impacts Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) - Construction Related Impacts The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts related to construction related air quality impacts. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance.PPP 4.3-1The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403, “Fugitive Dust.” Rule 403 requires implementation of best available dust control measures during construction activities that generate fugitive dust, such as earth moving and stockpiling activities, grading, and equipment travel on unpaved roads.PPP 4.3-2 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality District Rule 431.2, “Sulphur Content and Liquid Fuels.” The purpose of this rule is to limit the sulfur content in diesel and other liquid fuels for the purpose of both reducing the formation of sulfur oxides and particulates during combustion and to enable the use of add-on control devices for diesel fueled internal combustion engines. PPP 4.3-3 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113, “Architectural Coatings” Rule 1113 limits the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere during painting and application of other surface coatings. PPP 4.3-4The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1186“PM10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads and Livestock Operations”and Rule 1186.1, “Less-Polluting Street Sweepers.” Adherence to Rule 1186 and Rule 1186.1 reduces the release of criteria pollutant emissions into the atmosphere during construction. Impact AnalysisThe Project has the potential to generate pollutant concentrations during both construction activities and long-term operation. Both construction and operational emissions for the Project were estimated by using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) which is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for MA21143 Madone Project
21 government agencies to quantify potential criteria pollutant emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects. The model can be used for a variety of situations where an air quality analysis is necessary or desirable such as California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents and is authorized for use by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Construction activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of VOCs, NOX, SOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction activities:Demolition Site Preparation Grading Building Construction Paving Architectural Coating Construction is expected to last approximately 16 months. Table 4.3-3 summarizes the construction emissions considering the application of PPP 4.3-1 through 4.3-4. Table 4.3-3: Summary of Peak Construction EmissionsMaximum Daily EmissionsEmissions(lbs/day)VOC/ROGNOxCO SOx PM 10 PM2.5Maximum Daily Emissions 26.6 33.8 25.3 <0.1 10.0 5.5 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Memo (Appendix A).As shown in Table 4.3-3, emissions resulting from the Project construction will not exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant. Long-Term Regional Operation Related Impacts Long-term emissions are categorized as area source emissions, energy demand emissions, and operational emissions. Operational emissions will result from automobile, truck, and other vehicle sources associated with daily trips to and from the Project site. Area source emissions are the combination of many small emission sources that include use of outdoor landscape maintenance equipment, use of consumer products such as cleaning products, and periodic repainting of the proposed commercial facility. Energy demand emissions result from use of electricity and natural gas. The results of the CalEEMod model for operation of the Project site are summarized in Table 4.3-4.

MA21143 Madone Project
22 Table 4.3-4: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions SourceEmissions (lbs/day) VOC/ROGNOXCOSOXPM10PM2.5Total Maximum Daily Emissions 4.8 2.0 14.0 <0.1 2.5 0.7 SCAQMD Regional Threshold55 55 550 150 150 55Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Memo (Appendix A).As shown in Tables 4.3-4, Project related air emissions do not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. Threshold 4.3 (d). Would the Project: PotentiallySignificant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificant Impact No Impact Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts related to a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:(Refer to PPP 4.3.1 through PPP 4.3-4 under Issue 4.3(b) above).Localized Air Quality ImpactsThe South Coast Air Quality Management District has established Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) which are used to determine whether or not a project may generate significant adverse localized air quality impacts for both construction and on-site operations. For the purposes of a CEQA analysis, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a receptor such as residence, hospital, and convalescent facility where it is possible that an individual could remain for 24 hours If the calculated emissions for the proposed construction or operational activities are below the LST emission thresholds then the proposed construction or operation activity is not significant for air quality. For purposes of this analysis, the sensitive receptor locations in the proposed project area are the residential uses and the Camino Real Elementary School. A receptor location of 25 meters was used for emissions assessment to present a worse-case scenario. Table 4.3-5 identifies the maximum daily localized emissions thresholds that are applicable to the Project.

MA21143 Madone Project
23 Table 4.3-5 Maximum Daily Localized Emissions Thresholds Localized Thresholds (pounds per day) Pollutant ConstructionOperationsNOX 144 270 CO 7431,577 PM10 6 4 PM2.5 4 2 Source: Localized Thresholds presented in this table are based on the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, July 2008. Localized Construction Emissions Construction is expected to last approximately 14 months. Table 4.3-6 summarizes the localized construction emissions considering the application of PPP 4.3-1 through 4.3-4.As shown in Table 4.3-6, localized construction emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for emissions for construction activities. Table 4.3-6: Summary of Localized Significance Construction EmissionsGrading Emissions Emissions (lbs/day) NOXCOPM10 PM2.5Maximum Daily Emissions 33.7 24.7 3.0 2.0 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 144 743 6 4 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Source: Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Memo (Appendix A).Localized On-Site Operational Emissions Typical operational activities include on-site sources such as energy use and vehicle trips associated with residential development. As shown on Table 4.3-7, operational emissions will not exceed the LST thresholds for the nearest sensitive receptor. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur for Project-related operational-source emissions and no mitigation is required.Table 4.3-7: Summary of Localized Significance Operational EmissionsOperational Activity Emissions (lbs/day) NOXCOPM10 PM 2.5 Maximum Daily Emissions 0.6 3.7 <0.1 0.2 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 1,577 4 2 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Memo (Appendix A).

MA21143 Madone Project
24 CO Hot Spot Analysis CO Hot Spots are typically associated with idling vehicles at extremely busy intersections (i.e., intersections with an excess of 100,000 vehicle trips per day). There are no intersections in the vicinity of the Project site which exceed the 100,000 vehicle per day threshold typically associated with CO Hot Spots. In addition, the South Coast Air Basin has been designated as an attainment area for CO since 2007. Therefore, Project-related vehicular emissions would not create a Hot Spot and would not substantially contribute to an existing or projected CO Hot Spot. Threshold 4.3 (d). Would the ProjectPotentially SignificantImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than SignificantImpactNo ImpactResult in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Impact AnalysisAccording to the South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The Project does not propose any of the above-described uses. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed Project’s long-term operational uses. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction and is thus considered lessthan significant. It is expected that Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City’s solid waste regulations. Therefore, odors associated with the proposed Project construction and operations would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 4.4 Biological Resources The following analysis is based in part on the following technical reports: Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis and Biology Report, LSA Associates, Inc., October, 2021 and is included as Appendix B.

MA21143 Madone Project
25 Threshold 4.4 (a) Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactHave a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following applies to the Project and would reduce impacts related to candidate, sensitive, or special status species. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: PPP 4.4-1 The Project is required to pay mitigation fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MHSCP) as required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.80. Existing Conditions The topography of the Project site is relatively flat with elevations on the site averageapproximately 830 feet above mean seal level (MSL). The Project site contains the standing ruins of two buildings. Land use in the surrounding area include single family residential, an elementary school, and vacant land. The Project site is highly disturbed due to continued disking, the urban residential setting, and a previous brush fire on the northern portion of the site. The vegetation community within the Project site is characterized as sparse and ruderal in nature. Dominant vegetation consists of ruderal disturbed vegetation and nonnative grasslands including Australian saltbrush (Atriplex semibaccata), Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus), and mouse barley (Hordeum murinum). Dominant species in the nonnative grassland areas on the southern portion of the property include mouse barley, Australian saltbrush, ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), and smilo grass (Stipa miliacea var. miliacea). Native trees within the project site consist of a single coast live oak tree while nonnative trees on the site include Peruvian pepper tree (Schinus molle), China berry (Melia azedarach), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.), gold medallion (Cassia leptophylla), Mexican palo verde (Parkinsonia aculeata), date palm (Phoenix spp.), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), and citrus (Citrus sp.).

MA21143 Madone Project
26 Sensitive Plant Communities/Species The Project Site is located within the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), however it is not located in the Burrowing Owl Survey Area orNarrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA). Additionally, the Project site does not occur within a Criteria Cell and/or Cell Group, Core and/or Linkage Area, Criteria Area Plant Species Survey Area (CAPSSA), Mammal Survey Area, Invertebrate/Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Survey Area, or Amphibian Survey Area. Narrow Endemic PlantsThe Project site is not located within a NEPSSA, and therefore the Project will not impact the Narrow Endemic Plants. Sensitive Wildlife Species The Project site does not occur within the MSHCP Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) Survey Area, which is classified as a Species of Special Concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). However, the site was assessed in September 2021 which included an evaluation of soil texture; vegetative cover; topography; and the presence of mammal burrows, rock piles, or other suitable areas for nest construction. The site has low vegetative cover, is mostly devoid of trees, and contains suitable substrate for ground squirrel burrows. However, no Burrowing Owl were observed within the Project site, and no Burrowing Owl sign was detected in association with burrows. Because there is the possibility of burrowing owls occupying the site in the future, the following mitigation measure is recommended: Mitigation Measures (MM) The following measures are required to be performed prior to clearing and grubbing within the Project site (Impact Site) to avoid impacts to burrowing owl: MM-BIO-1: Pre-Construction Burrowing Owl Survey / Burrowing Owl Protection.A 30-day pre-construction survey for burrowing owls is required prior to future ground-disturbing activities (e.g., vegetation clearing, clearing and grubbing, tree removal, site watering, equipment staging, etc.) to ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the days or weeks preceding the ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the project site prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities, the project proponent will immediately inform the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies and will need to coordinate in the future with the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to initiating ground disturbance. If ground-disturbing activities occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than 30 days, a pre-construction survey will again be necessary to ensure that burrowing owl have not colonized the site since it was last disturbed. If burrowing owls are found, the same coordination described above will be necessary.

MA21143 Madone Project
27 Threshold 4.4 (b). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactHave a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Impact AnalysisThe Biological Report concluded that the Project site does not contain any native vegetation communities, including special-status vegetation communities, or riparian habitat. As noted in Threshold 4.4(a) above, the entire property is disturbed, with vegetated areas dominated by non-native, ruderal species. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impacts on special-status vegetation communities or riparian habitat. Threshold 4.4 (c) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Impact AnalysisThe Biological Report concluded that the Project site does not contain any state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.). The Project site does not contain jurisdictional waters. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact on state or federally protected wetlands. 1313 MSHCP Consistency and Biology Report: Appendix B MA21143 Madone Project
28 Threshold 4.4 (d). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactInterfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?Impact AnalysisWildlife corridors link together areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. Corridors effectively act as links between different populations of a species. The Project Site area proposed for development does not represent a wildlife travel route, crossing or regional movement corridor between large open space habitats. The Project Site is bordered by existing roads, residential, and elementary school. As such, the Project will not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors. The site supports nesting opportunities for common migratory bird species. All migratory bird species, whether listed or not, also receive protection under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 191814. The MBTA prohibits individuals to kill, take, possess, or sell any migratory bird, bird parts (including nests and eggs) except per regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Department (16 U. S. Code 7034).Therefore, if vegetation is to be removed during the nesting season, a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted, and avoidance measures taken to ensure that no take of birds or their nests will occur per Mitigation Measure BIO-3. MM-BIO-2: Nesting Bird Protection. As feasible, vegetation clearing should be conducted outside of the nesting season, which is generally identified as February 1 through August 31. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. 14United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, August 8, 2017, Available at: https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/laws-legislations/migratory-bird-treaty-act.php MA21143 Madone Project
29 Threshold 4.4 (e) Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactConflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Impact AnalysisAccording to the General Plan, significant trees are those trees that make substantial contributions to natural habitat or to the urban landscape due to their species, size, or rarity. In particular, California native trees should be protected.15 According to the General Plan, other significant vegetation includes agricultural wind screen plantings, street trees, stands of maturenative and non-native trees, and other features of ecological, aesthetic, and conservation value16. The entire proposed Project Site is disturbed, with vegetated areas dominated by non-native, ruderal species. Native trees within the project site consist of a single coast live oak tree (Quercus agrifolia var. agrifolia). Nonnative trees within the project site consist of Peruvian pepper tree (Schinus molle), China berry (Melia azedarach), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.), gold medallion (Cassia leptophylla), Mexican palo verde (Parkinsonia aculeata), date palm (Phoenix spp.), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), and citrus (Citrus sp.)Concerning the single coast live oak tree on the site, the City of Jurupa Valley includes provisions for the protection and conservation of oak and other native tree and floral species within the City to protect the natural diversity. These provisions include the following General Plan Policies: COS 1.2 Protection of Significant Trees. Protect and preserve significant trees, as determined by the City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Significant trees are those trees that make substantial contributions to natural habitat or to the urban landscape due to their species, size, or rarity. In particular, California native trees should be protected. mature native and non-native trees, and other features of ecological, aesthetic, and conservation value.Open Space Policy 9.3 - Maintain and conserve superior examples of native trees, natural vegetation, stands of established trees, and other features for ecosystem, aesthetic, and water conservation purposes. Open Space Policy 9.4 - Conserve the oak tree resources within in the County (i.e. City). These policies are meant to preserve the, continued viability of habitat communities within the City. The single coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) tree onsite is a California native tree species endemic to Southern California.The County of Riverside has published Oak Tree Management Guidelines, March 2, 1993 which the City has adopted upon incorporation and apply to oak woodlands. Although the tree is not 15 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, Policy COS-1.2. 16City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, Policy COS-1.3.

MA21143 Madone Project
30 considered an oak woodland, the guidance provided in the Guidelines can be used as a basis for mitigating impacts to the tree even though it is not considered oak woodlands because impacts to individual trees are discussed in the Guidelines. Based on General Plan policies COS 1.2, OS 9.3and OS 9.4above, preservation is the preferred alternative. If the trees are to be preserved the following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce impacts:Mitigation Measures (MM)MM-BIO-3.Dedication of Open Space Lot and Tree Maintenance. If the tree is to be preserved, prior to the recordation of the Final Map, a lettered or numbered lot shall be provided for the tree to be preserved. This lot shall be dedicated to the City in order to allow for continued maintenance of the tree(s) the City or approved maintenance entity as follows: Construction of a wrought iron fence is necessary positioned just outside of the dripline around the tree to reduce the risk of injury in the event of failure. Landscape design must integrate the existing oak tree on site in a way that diverts excess water runoff or irrigation from accumulating and pooling within the tree's dripline. This final design must be reviewed by a certified landscape architect and approved by the Planning Manager. Strategic crown thinning to reduce loading on the stem. Heavier pruning of coast live oaks should occur during July-August and not more than 25% of the crown can be removed during any single year. All pruning should be performed or directed by an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist or Tree Worker in accordance with the Best Management Practices for Pruning by the International Society of Arboriculture, 2002 and adhere to the most recent editions of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Tree Care Operations Z133.1 and Pruning A300. Any oak tree maintenance activity onsite should be done at the direction of an ISA Certified Arborist or American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA) Registered Consulting Arborist. Oak tree pruning must be kept to a minimum (except initially as described in Item 4 above); it typically involves removing dead or diseased wood, hazardous branches, or limb structures and providing clearance. Pruning should be done early during branch development to avoid cuts greater than 4 inches in diameter. The smaller wound size will reduce the chance of infection. Excessive and injurious pruning is defined as the removal of more than 25 percent of the functioning leaf, stem, or root system of a tree in any 24-month period. Disinfected pruning tools must be used at all times and in between trees to reduce the spread of sudden oak death and other contagious diseases. Annual surveys by a certified arborist are recommended once the development is completed.

MA21143 Madone Project
31 If the tree cannot be preserved in place, mitigation for its removal is replacement with 15-gallon, nursery-grown stock at various ratios depending on the size of the oak tree pursuant to Mitigation Measure BIO-3. BIO-4. Oak Tree Replacement:Prior to the issuance of any tree removal or the issuance of a grading permit, the oak tree shall be replaced as follows: Coast Live Oak Tree: Replacement by five, 15-gallon trees (5:1 ratio) of the same species at the discretion of the City's Planning Manager. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-3and BIO-4, impacts will be less than significant. Threshold 4.4 (f) Would the project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Impact AnalysisThe Project site is located within the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan.17The plan provides coverage (including take authorization for listed species) for special-status plant and animal species, as well as mitigation for impacts to sensitive species.The conclusions and recommendations from the MSHCP Consistency Analysis, prepared for the Project (Appendix B) are listed in Table 4.4-1: Table 4.4-1: MSHCP Consistency Analysis 18MSHCP Element/Requirements Project Site Status Criteria Cell/Cell Group The Project site is not located within a MSHCP Criteria Area or Criteria Cell Group.Area Plan Subunit The Project site is not located within a MSHCP Area Plan Subunit. Habitat Management Unit The Project site is not located within a Habitat Management Unit. The Project site is not located within or adjacent to MSHCP Conserved Lands. MSHCP Conservation Areas The Project site is not located within a MSHCP Conservation Area. 17Regional Conservation Authority, Western Riverside County, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, June 17, 2003. 18 MSHCP Consistency Analysis and Biology Report, Appendix B.

MA21143 Madone Project
32 Public/Quasi Public (PQP) Conservation Land The Project site is not located within Public/Quasi Public Conservation Land. Narrow Endemic Plants (MSHCP Section 6.1.3) The Project site is not located within the NEPSSA. Additional Species Surveys (including Burrowing Owl, Criteria Area Species, Amphibians, and Mammals) [MSHCP Section 6.3.2] The Project site is not located within the Burrowing Owl Survey Area. No signs of burrowing owl were observed during the habitat assessment. However, due to the presence of suitable burrowing owl habitat within the site, there is a potential for burrowing owls to occupy the site. A 30-day pre-construction burrowing owl survey will be required to be conducted prior to construction activities. No other additional species surveys are required per the MSHCP. Riparian/Riverine Resources (MSHCP Section 6.1.2) Riparian/riverine resources are not present within the Project Site. No changes in hydrology are expected as a result of this Project. Vernal Pools (MSHCP Section 6.1.2) No vernal pools or seasonal depressions are present onsite. No vernal pools were identified within the immediate vicinity of the Project and therefore no indirect impacts to vernal pools are anticipated. Fairy Shrimp (MSHCP Section 6.1.2) Due to the lack of suitable habitat on the Project site, no impacts to fairy shrimp are anticipated. Delhi-Sands flower-loving fly Delhi Soil Series are not mapped within the Project site and therefore the site lacks suitable Delhi-Sands flower-loving fly habitat. No impacts to Delhi-Sands flower-loving fly are anticipated. Guidelines Pertaining to Urban/ Wildlands Interface (MSHCP Section 6.1.4) The proposed Project is not located in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area or other native habitats. As such, the Project will not result in significant indirect effects to biological resources. Furthermore, the Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines do not apply to the proposed Project. With implementation of PPP 4.4-1 and MM-BIO-1 through BIO-4, impacts are less than significant. 4.5 Cultural Resources The analysis in this section is based in part on the following technical report: Cultural Resources Assessment, TTM NO. 38151 Madone Collections, LSA Associates, Inc., dated October 2021 and is included as Appendix C to this Initial Study. Threshold 4.5 (a) Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5? MA21143 Madone Project
33 Impact AnalysisHistoric resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic event or person(s) and/or have a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damaging or demolition of historic resources is typically considered to be a significant impact. Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(a) clarifies that historical resources include the following: 1. A resource listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. 2. A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code, or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements [of] section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code.3. Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California.Historic Setting The Project site is located in a general location associated with Native American occupation and/or use during prehistoric and protohistoric periods. It is also an area associated with historic Mexican period rancho activity, American period ranching and farming activity, and, more recently, residential development. The Project site is currently vacant, a burnt-down residence constructed in 1915 and related shed/bunkhouse structure (destroyed during the fire) was used during the period when the property was cultivated (likely citrus) from the late 1940s into the 1980s after which the orchard was abandoned. Research and Conclusions A cultural resources records search, additional research, and a field survey were conducted for the project area. Records Search A record search was conducted at the University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center (EIC) , Riverside, for the Project site. This search included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites within a one-mile radius of the Project site. In addition, the MA21143 Madone Project
34 California Points of Historical Interest (PHI), the listing of California Historical Landmarks (CHL), the California Register of Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) were checked. Historic maps were also reviewed. The EIC records search and literature review revealed 18 cultural resources recorded within onemile of the Project Site. The nearest prehistoric resource was documented approximately 1,495 meters north-northeast of the site. None of the recorded resources will be impacted by the proposed Project. In addition, research failed to identify any National Register of Historic Places properties; no California State Landmarks; no California Register of Historical Resources; nor any California Points of Historical Interest in the immediate vicinity that will be impacted as a result of the Project. Pedestrian Survey A pedestrian survey of the entire project area was conducted as part of LSA’s Cultural Resources Assessment. The survey found that the project site has been subjected to decades of orchard cultivation and surface disturbance from weed abatement disking. Structural rubble, landscape dumping, and modern refuse were noted on the surface throughout the project site. Standing ruins of two buildings were documented on the property. A one-story adobe residence was located in the northwestern portion of the parcel and featured a poured concrete/brick patio and brick walkway on its south side. The roof and the entire interior (including the wood floor) burned, leaving the adobe walls largely intact. A related fire-damaged one-story shed/bunkhouse building is located approximately 300 feet east in the south-central portion of the parcel. The east half of the building burned to the floor. The resource was a relatively early example of a grove house and ancillary building with remnant windrow trees on a multi-acre parcel. While uncommon, the buildings’ methods of construction (adobe with mud-sill floors, various siding materials and composition roofing) are not unique and there is no surface indication of associated subsurface deposits. While the structures are historic in age, they were not designed by an architect of importance, do not possess any architecturally important elements, were not associated with any significant historic events, and the owners and occupants are not historically significant to the community. Based upon the conclusions reached during the evaluation, no mitigation measures or preservation are recommended for the structures. Although the structures were evaluated and determined not to meet the definition of a historic structure per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the potential exists that unidentified significant historic deposits (e.g. a privy pit or intact refuse deposit dating prior to the 1920s) may be present that are related to the occupation of these structure since the 1900s and earlier. Because of this potential to encounter buried historic deposits, Mitigation Measure CR-1below is required.

MA21143 Madone Project
35 Threshold 4.5 (b) Would the project:PotentiallySignificantImpact Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactCause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5? Impact AnalysisArchaeological SettingArchaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with former human activities, and may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool manufacture, tool concentrations, and/or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains. A summary of previous findings cited in the Cultural Resources Assessment relating to the archaeological setting are summarized below: Research and Conclusions A standard archaeological records check was completed through the University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center. This research was designed to compile data on previous studies, the identification of nearby architectural resources, and to place the Project site in a context for assessing the sensitivity of the Project site to yield evidence of archaeological resources. The recent research identified the Project site as having a moderate level of sensitivity for prehistoric archaeological and historic archaeological resources. The intensive survey of the property failed to yield any evidence of prehistoric or historic archaeological resources. While there is always a potential for buried resources, the potential is relatively low and, with no evidence of bedrock outcroppings and the extensive farming conducted over decades, it is unlikely buried resources will be identified within the Project site. However, since the area is still considered slightly sensitive (resources have been recorded within one mile), should any evidence of prehistoric archaeological resources be encountered during grading activities, the following mitigation measures are required: Mitigation Measure(s) (MM): Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following notes shall be placed on the grading plan:findings shall be prepared by the archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department and the Eastern Information Center.

MA21143 Madone Project
36 MM-CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Permit Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department that a qualified professional archaeologist (Professional Archaeologist) that is listed on the City of Jurupa Valley Cultural Resources Consultant List or the Cultural Resource Consultant List maintained by the County of Riverside Planning Department, has been contracted to implement Archaeological Monitoring for the area of impact for the Project. Monitoring shall be conducted in coordination with the Consulting Tribe(s), defined as a Tribe that initiated the tribal consultation process for the Project as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b) (“AB52”) and has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City. Monitoring shall address the details of all ground-disturbing activities and provides procedures that must be followed to avoid or reduce potential impacts on cultural, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources to a level that is less than significant. A fully executed copy of the Archaeological Monitoring Agreement shall be provided to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this measure. If the resource is significant, Mitigation Measure CR-2 shall apply.MM-CR-2: Archeological Treatment Plan:The Project Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a treatment plan to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall be per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code § 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementing archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource and subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. If historic Native American tribal cultural resources are involved, the Treatment Plan shall be coordinated with the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through TCR-3 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143.MM-CR-3: Final Report:A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the Project Archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department and the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside. If a historic tribal cultural resource is involved, a copy shall be provided to the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through 3 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143.

MA21143 Madone Project
37 Threshold 4.5 (c) Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess Than Significant Impact with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactDisturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to disturbing human remains. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance: PPP 4.5-1 The project is required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code §7050.5 as well as Public Resources Code §5097 et. seq. The Project site does not contain a cemetery and no known formal cemeteries are located within the immediate site vicinity. If human remains are discovered during Project grading or other ground disturbing activities, the Project would be required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code §7050.5 as well as Public Resources Code §5097 et. seq. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b), remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made by the Coroner. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) must be contacted and the NAHC must then immediately notify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

MA21143 Madone Project
38 4.6 Energy Threshold 4.6 (a) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Impact AnalysisConstruction Energy AnalysisConstruction of the Project would require the use of fuel and electric powered equipment and vehicles for construction activities. The majority of activities would use fuel powered equipment and vehicles that would consume gasoline or diesel fuel. Heavy construction equipment (e.g.,dozers, graders, backhoes, dump trucks) would be diesel powered, while smaller construction vehicles, such as pick-up trucks and personal vehicles used by workers would be gasoline powered. The majority of electricity use would be from power tools. The anticipated construction schedule assumes the Project would be built in approximately 14 months. The consumption of energy would be temporary in nature and would not represent a significant demand on available supplies. There are no unusual characteristics that would necessitate the use of fuel or electricity that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State. Starting in 2014, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted the nation's first regulation aimed at cleaning up off-road construction equipment such as bulldozers, graders, and backhoes. These requirements ensure fleets gradually turnover the oldest and dirtiest equipment to newer, cleaner models and prevent fleets from adding older, dirtier equipment. As such, the equipment used for Project construction would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards as fuel efficiencies gradually rise. It should also be noted that there are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities; or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel. In addition, as required by state law19, idling times of construction vehicles is limited to no more than five minutes, thereby minimizing, or eliminating unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel. 19California Code of Regulations Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling.

MA21143 Madone Project
39 Operation Energy Analysis Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation energy demands and operational energy demands. Transportation Energy Demands Energy that would be consumed by Project-generated traffic is a function of total vehicles miles traveled (VMT) and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The Project will result in: 1,161,285 VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 44,665 gallonsof fuel.20Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and relatedtransition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels, hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region, acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. Operational Energy Demands Occupancy of the single-family residences would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Energy demands are estimated at 759,599 kBTU/year of natural gas and 179,055kWh/year of electricity. 21Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by SoCalGas andelectricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes single-family homes reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project does not propose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total would be comparable to other single-family land use projects of similar scale and configuration. Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compliance itself with applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. In summary, as supported by the preceding analyses, neither construction nor operation of the Project would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, orwasteful use of energy resources. 20Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis. (avg 26 mpg passenger car) 21 Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis.

MA21143 Madone Project
40 Threshold 4.6(b) Would the Project:PotentiallySignificantImpact Less than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactConflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?Impact AnalysisThe California Energy Commission provides oversight for the preparation of rules and regulations for the conservation of energy such as Appliance Energy Efficiency, Building Energy Efficiency, Energy Supplier Reporting, and State Energy Management. The regulations directly applicable to the Project areBuilding Energy Efficiency Standards, Title 24, Part 6, and CALGreenTitle 24, Part 11. These regulations include, but are not limited to the use of energy efficient heating and cooling systems, water conserving plumbing, and water-efficient irrigation systems. The Project is required to demonstrate compliance with these regulations as part of the building permit and inspection process. 4.7 Geology And Soils The following analysis is based in part on the following technical report: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Water Infiltration Test Report, Converse Consultants, April 22, 2021 and is included as Appendix D.Note: There are no Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zones located in Jurupa Valley, therefore, this topic is not addressed in the Initial Study.Threshold 4.7(a1) Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than SignificantImpact NoImpactStrong seismic ground shaking? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to seismic ground shaking. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:PPP 4.7-1As required by Municipal Code Section 8.05.010, the Project shall comply with the most recent edition of the California Building Code which requires the Project to MA21143 Madone Project
41 comply with the approved recommended seismic design requirements contained in the Geotechnical Evaluation, EEI Engineering Solutions and be incorporated in the construction of each structure, to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards.The Project site is in a seismically active area of Southern California and is expected to experience moderate to severe ground shaking during the lifetime of the Project. This risk is not considered substantially different than that of other similar properties in the Southern California area. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to conduct site preparation and grading as well as construct the proposed structures in accordance with theapproved recommendations included in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project. (Appendix D). Threshold 4.7(a2) Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to seismic ground shaking. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program:PPP 4.7-1shall apply. According to General Plan22 the Project site has a high potential for liquefaction. According to the Geotechnical Evaluation for the Project liquefaction analyses determined that based on the relatively dense/fine grained nature of the soils, and bedrock being at approximately 35 feet bgs, with recommended remedial grading, liquefaction is expected to be negligible.The Geotechnical Evaluation indicates that the soil deposits underlying the property are not susceptible to liquefaction or significant amounts of seismically-induced settlement. However; liquefaction is possible within the northern perimeter slope. Per PPP 4.7-1 as a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to conduct site preparation and grading as well as construct the proposed structures in accordance with the recommendations included in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project.(Appendix D).22 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Safety Element, Figure 8-5: Liquefaction Susceptibility in Jurupa Valley.

MA21143 Madone Project
42 Threshold 4.7(a3). Would the Project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactLandslides?Impact AnalysisEvidence of ancient landslides or slope instabilities at this site was not observed during the geotechnical investigation. The subject property is not adjacent to any steep slopes and does not lie within an earthquake induced landslide zone.Per PPP 4.7-1- as a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to conduct site preparation and grading as well as construct the proposed structures in accordance with the recommendations included in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project. (Appendix D). Threshold 4.7(b). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Impact AnalysisConstructionGrading and construction activities would expose and loosen topsoil, which could be eroded by wind or water. The Municipal Code requires the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan to address site-specific conditions related to these activities23. The plan will identify potential sources of erosion and sedimentation loss of topsoil during construction, and identify erosion control measures to reduce or eliminate the erosion and loss of topsoil, such as use of silt fencing, fiber rolls, or gravel bags, stabilized construction entrance/exit, hydroseeding.Through compliance with the Municipal Code, construction impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant.OperationThe proposed Project includes installation of landscaping throughout the Project site and areas of loose topsoil that could erode by wind or water would not exist upon operation of the Project.In the proposed condition, storm water will flow to the internal street system and be conveyed to the southwest across the Project site towards the infiltration basin with overflow to the 23City of Jurupa Valley, Municipal Code, Chapter 6.05.010, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls.

MA21143 Madone Project
43 existing flood control storm drain south of the property. The use of the infiltration basin reduces the potential for stormwater to erode topsoil downstream. Threshold 4.7(c). Would the Project: PotentiallySignificantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificant Impact No Impact Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable because of the Project, and potentially result in on-site or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to an unstable geologic unit. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:PPP 4.7-1 shall apply.Landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, and collapse as a result of an earthquake are largely dependent on the underlying geologic conditions (e.g., bedrock, type of soil, and thedepth of the water table). The site is composed artificial fill material cementitious slope fill materials which are considered undocumented fill. Underlying the fill materials are older alluvial fan deposits consisting of silts, sands, and clays with gravel with bedrock at depths of 30 to 51.5feet. The granular earth materials were observed to be typically moist to saturated, loose to very dense and medium stiff to hard. The water table is at a depth of 18 to 29 feet bgs. Landslides:The Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation for the Project site states that evidence of ancient landslides or slope instabilities was not observed during the investigation. Thus, the potential for landslides is considered negligible for design purposesLateral Spreading: When subsurface sand layers lose strength because of liquefaction, lateral spreading can occur in overlying sediments allowing them to move down even the gentlest slopes. The potential for and magnitude of lateral spreading is dependent upon many conditions, including the presence of a relatively thick, continuous, potentially liquefiable sand layer and high slopes. Subsurface information obtained for the Geotechnical Evaluation indicate that the soil deposits underlying the property are not susceptible to liquefaction or seismically-induced settlement. Based on currently available procedures, the site does not appear to be susceptible to (lateral spread) ground surface disruption during a moderate seismic event. Subsidence/Collapse: Land subsidence can occur in various ways during an earthquake. Large areas of land can subside drastically during an earthquake because of offset along fault lines. Land subsidence can also occur as a result of settling and compacting of MA21143 Madone Project
44 unconsolidated sediment from the shaking of an earthquake. Cohesive soils such as clay and silt are particularly likely to cause subsidence since they shrink and swell depending on their moisture content. According to the USGS Land Subsidence in California Map, the Project site is not located in an area where subsidence has occurred.24Liquefaction: The occurrence of liquefaction is restricted to certain geologic and hydrologic environments, primarily in areas with recently deposited sands and silts (usually less than 10,000 years old) with high ground-water levels. It is most common where the water table is at a depth of less than 30-feet. As noted in the response to Threshold 4.7 (a2), according to General Plan25the Project site has a high potential for liquefaction.The Geotechnical Evaluation indicates that the soil deposits underlying the property are not susceptible to liquefaction. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to conduct site preparation and grading as well as construct the proposed structures in accordance with the approved recommendations included in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project. (Appendix D). Threshold 4.7(d) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Be located on expansive soil, as defined in the Uniform Building Code, creating substantial risks to life or property? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, and ProgramsThe following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to expansive soils. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance: PPP 4.7-1shall apply. Expansive soils are characterized by their ability to undergo significant volume changes (shrink or swell) due to variations in moisture content. Changes in soil moisture content can result from precipitation, landscape irrigation, utility leakage, roof drainage, perched groundwater, drought, or other factors and may result in unacceptable settlement or heave of structures or concrete slabs supported on grade.24 USGS Land Subsidence in California: https://ca.water.usgs.gov/land_subsidence/california-subsidence-areas.html 25 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Safety Element, Figure 8-5: Liquefaction Susceptibility in Jurupa Valley.

MA21143 Madone Project
45 The expansion index,EI, value is used by engineers and other professionals as an indicator of the soil’s swelling potential. According to American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM) Standard D4829, soil having an expansion potential of greater than 91 is considered to be expansive soil. Based on laboratory testing, the materials present near the ground surface have an Expansion Index EI=2 which is less than an Expansion Index of greater than 91. As such, risks from expansive soils are considered to be low. Notwithstanding, the Project would be required to construct the proposed structures in accordance with the approved recommendations included in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the project (Appendix D).Threshold 4.7(e) Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpactNoImpactHave soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Impact AnalysisThe Project does not propose the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. The Project would install domestic sewer infrastructure and connect to the Jurupa Community Service District’s existing sewer conveyance and treatment system. Threshold 4.7(f) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? The following analysis is based in part on the following technical report: Cultural Resources Assessment, LSA Associates, dated October 2021 and is included as Appendix C to this Initial Study. Impact Analysis General Plan Figure 4-18- Paleontological Sensitivity, indicates that the site has a high sensitivity (Ha) designation for finding paleontological resources26. Area paleontological overviews have been prepared by Dr. Samuel McLeod of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, these overviews included a review of applicable literature, geologic maps, and the identification of local resources known to the Museum. McLeod (2020) indicated that excavations in the exposed igneous rocks will not uncover any recognizable fossils, shallow excavations into older Quaternary Alluvium may not encounter 26 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-18, Paleontological Sensitivity.

MA21143 Madone Project
46 significant vertebrate fossils, however deeper excavations my encounter fossil vertebrates. Therefore, the following mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures (MM):MM-GEO-1: Paleontological Monitoring.Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified Paleontologist shall be retained to conduct monitoring as necessary during ground-disturbing activities such as vegetation removal, grading, and other excavations related to the project. The Paleontologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference and shall establish a schedule for paleontological resource surveillance based on the nature of planned activities. The Paleontologist shall establish, in cooperation with the lead agency, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work, if any is ongoing, to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of cultural resources as appropriate. If the paleontological resources are found to be significant, the Paleontologist/Monitor shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the lead agency, for exploration and/or salvage. Significant sites that cannot be avoided will require data recovery measures and shall be completed upon approval of a Data Recovery Plan. MM-GEO-2: Paleontological Treatment Plan. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground-disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre-grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground-disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (more than 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level. Unique Geologic Feature The Project site is relatively flat. The site soils generally consist of artificial fill, topsoil, and olderalluvial fan deposits soils consisting of silty sand with bedrock at depths of approximately 35 feetbgs. The granular earth materials are very loose to very dense. These features are common in the area. As such, the Project does not contain a geologic feature that is unique or exclusive locally or regionally. With implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2, impacts are less than significant.

MA21143 Madone Project
47 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions The following analysis is based in part on the following technical memo: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimate Tables Memorandum, LSA, dated October 5, 2021, Appendix A. Threshold 4.8 (a-b) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to greenhouse gas emissions. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance: PPP 4.8-1 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant shall submit plans showing that the Project will be constructed in compliance with the most recently adopted edition of the applicable California Energy Code, (Part 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) and the California Green Building Standards Code, 2019 Edition (Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations).PPP 4.8-2As required by Municipal Code Section 9.283.010, Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements,prior to the approval of landscaping plans, the Project proponent shall prepare and submit landscape plans that demonstrate compliance with this section.No single land use project could generate enough greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to noticeably change the global average temperature. Cumulative GHG emissions, however, contribute to global climate change and its significant adverse environmental impacts. Thus, the primary goal in adopting GHG significance thresholds, analytical methodologies, and mitigation measures is to ensure new land use development provides its fair share of the GHG reductions needed to address cumulative environmental impacts from those emissions.Thresholds of SignificanceA final numerical threshold for determining the significance of greenhouse gas emissions in the South Coast Air Basin has not been established by the South Coast Air Quality Management MA21143 Madone Project
48 District. General Plan Policy AQ 9.5 requires the City to utilize the SCAQMD Draft GHG thresholds to evaluate development proposals until the City adopts a Climate Action Plan (CAP). The City has determined that the SCAQMD’s draft threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is appropriatefor residential land use development projects. The 3,000 MTCO2e threshold is based on the SCAQMD staff’s proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary source emissions for non-industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD’s Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans (“SCAQMD Interim GHG Threshold”). The SCAQMD Interim GHG Threshold identifies a screening threshold to determine whether additionalanalysis is required. This threshold is also consistent with the SCAQMD’s draft interim threshold Tier 3.A summary of the projected annual operational greenhouse gas emissions, including amortized construction-related emissions associated with the development of the Project is provided in Table 4.8-1. Table 4.8-1: Annual Greenhouse Gas EmissionsEmission SourceTotal Emissions (MTCO2e per year)Annual construction-related emissions amortized over 30 years 17.8 Area Source 8.0 Energy Source 72.7 Mobile Source 398.6 Waste 8.4 Water Usage 15.8 Total CO2E (All Sources) 521.3 Screening Threshold (CO2E) 3,000 Threshold Exceeded NO Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Memo (Appendix A). As shown on Table 4.8-1, the Project has the potential to generate a total of approximately 521.3 MTCO2e per year. As such, the Project would not exceed the City’s screening threshold of3,000 MTCO2e. Thus, Project-related emissions would not have a significant direct or indirectimpact on greenhouse gas emissions that could impact climate change and no mitigation or further analysis is required.

MA21143 Madone Project
49 Threshold 4.8 (a-b) Would the Project:Potentially Significant or SignificantImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than SignificantImpactNo Impactb. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Impact AnalysisDetermining a project’s consistency with plans, policies or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions plans presents unique challenges because the impact is global and solutions require both global, federal, state, and local action. The following are the primary plans adopted at the State level to reduce GHG emissions: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) Scoping Plan is the state’s overall strategy in the form of measures that apply to emission sectors that comprise the state’s greenhouse gas emission inventory. The state’s implementation strategy primarily takes the form of source-specific regulations for energy producers fuel suppliers, and vehicle manufacturers. For example, California Light-Duty Vehicle GHG Standards and Low Carbon Fuel Standard. The Scoping Plan envisions a limited role for local government in implementing the state’s GHG reduction strategy, focusing on local government’s authority over land use and some transportation projects. The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (Sustainable Communities Act, SB 375, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) supports the State's climate action goals to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through coordinated transportation and land use planning with the goal of more sustainable communities. To this end, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), has adopted the Connect SoCal – The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategywhich charts a course for closely integrating land use and transportation to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. Implementation of Connect SoCal depends on partnerships with our local jurisdictions and County Transportation Commissions (CTCs). The land use strategies in Connect SoCal are based on a growth vision that was developed through extensive consultation with local communities, which proposes multiple different types of Priority Growth Areas, as well as identifying regional growth constraints. SCAG provides resources to help local jurisdictions align local plans and programs with the regional growth vision through a series of technical assistance and funding programs. Certain measures of the Scoping Plan and Connect SoCal are supported by the Project, such as energy conservation and energy efficiency measures. Other measures, while not directly applicable, would not be obstructed or impeded by Project implementation.

MA21143 Madone Project
50 The City is in the process of preparing a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in conjunction with WRCOG which will identify specific policies and regulations that are directed at the project level. Until such time that the City adopts a CAP, the Project is evaluated for consistency with the following plans, policies, or regulations to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as shown in Table 4.8.2, Consistency with GHG Reduction Measures.Table 4.8 - 2. Consistency with GHG Reduction MeasuresGHG Reduction MeasureConsistency AnalysisGeneral Plan AQ 9.5 GHG Thresholds. Utilize the SCAQMD Draft GHG thresholds to evaluate development proposals until the City adopts a Climate Action Plan (CAP). Consistent.The City has determined that the SCAQMD’s draft threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is appropriate for this Project. GHG emissions are 521.3 MTCO2e which is less than the 3,000 MTCO2e threshold.CSSF 2.44 Drought-Tolerant Landscaping. Require the use of drought-tolerant landscaping in all new development. Consistent. The Project is required to comply with Section 9.283 (Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirement) of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code. LUE 11.6 Energy Efficiency.Require development projects to use energy efficient design features in their site planning, building design and orientation, and landscape design that meet or exceed state energy standards.Consistent. The Project is required to submit building plans and is required to meet CALGreen Codes, CA Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards, and City’s water efficient landscape requirements; therefore, the Project is determined to be consistent with General Plan Policy LUE 11.6. ME 3.9 Pedestrian Facilities. Public streets shall provide pedestrian facilities in accordance with adopted City standards. Sidewalks shall be separated from the roadway by a landscaped parkway, except where the Planning Director determines that attached sidewalks are appropriate due to existing sidewalk location, design, or other conditions. Consistent. Parkway improvements on Clay Street include curb adjacent landscaping and sidewalk. ME 3.36 Bicycle ImprovementsConditionally Required. Require the construction or rehabilitation of bicycle facilities and/or “bicycle-friendly” improvements as a condition of approving new development, in accordance with Zoning Ordinance standards Consistent.The Project is providing a network of multipurpose trails, sidewalks and paseos to throughout the community. The trails will allow for biking, walking, pedestrian, and equestrian use. Municipal CodeEnergy Efficiency Consistent. As required by Municipal Code Section 8.05.010 (7), California Energy Code, prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant shall submit plans showing that the Project will be constructed in compliance with this section. Green Buildings Consistent. As required by Municipal Code Section 8.05.010 (8), California Green Building Standards Code, prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project MA21143 Madone Project
51 GHG Reduction Measure Consistency Analysisproponent shall submit plans in compliance with this code section.Water ConservationConsistent.The Project will comply withChapter 9.283. - Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements.Solid Waste Reduction Consistent. The Project shall comply with Section 4.408 of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards, which requires new development projects to submit and implement a construction waste management plan in order to reduce the amount of construction waste transported to landfills. Based on analysis above, the Project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. 4.9 - Hazards And Hazardous Materials Threshold 4.9(a) (b) Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Impact AnalysisExisting ConditionsThe subject site currently contains the ruins of two buildings with the remainder of the property highly disturbed due to continued disking and its urban residential setting as well as a previous brush fire that occurred on the northern portion of the site. Vegetation consisting of nonnative grasses, and small trees are present. During the biological assessment no, ponds, swamps, or lagoons were observed on the subject property.Construction ActivitiesHeavy equipment that would be used during construction of the proposed Project would be fueled and maintained by substances such as oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluid, and other liquid materials that would be considered hazardous if improperly stored or handled. In addition, materials such as paints, roofing materials, solvents, and other substances typically used in MA21143 Madone Project
52 building construction would be located on the Project site during construction. Improper use, storage, or transportation of hazardous materials could result in accidental releases or spills, potentially posing health risks to workers, the public, and the environment. The potential for accidental releases and spills of hazardous materials during construction is a standard risk on all construction sites, and there would be no greater risk for improper handling, transportation, or spills associated with future development that would be a reasonably consequence of the proposed Project than would occur on any other similar construction site.Construction contractors are required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding hazardous materials, including but not limited requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. As such, impacts due to construction activities would not cause a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. A less than significant impact would occur. Operational Activities The Project site would be developed with residential land uses which is a land use not typically associated with the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Although residential land uses may utilize household products that contain toxic substances, such as cleansers, paints, adhesives, and solvents, these products are usually in low concentration and small in amount and would not pose a significant risk to humans or the environment during transport to/from or use at the Project site. Pursuant to State law and local regulations, residents would be required to dispose of household hazardous waste (e.g., batteries, used oil, old paint) at a permitted household hazardous waste collection facility. Accordingly, the Project would not expose people or the environment to significant hazards associated with the disposal of hazardous materials at the Project site. Long-term operation of the Project would not expose the public or the environment to significant hazards associated with the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Threshold 4.9 (c) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Impact AnalysisThe Project site is located within one-quarter (0.25) mile of a mile from two existing schools. From the Project site, the nearest schools are Camino Real Elementary School located adjacent MA21143 Madone Project
53 to the Project site on the southern property border and the Patriot High School located northwest across Jurupa Road. The proposed Project is for residential use and not associated with operations that would typically emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous, or acutely hazardous materials. As discussed in the responses to issues 4.9 (b) and 4.9 (c) above, all hazardous or potentially hazardous materials would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local agencies and regulations with respect to hazardous materials. Therefore, regardless of the proximity of planned or proposed schools, the Project will not impact schools. Threshold 4.9 (d) Would the Project: PotentiallySignificantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificant Impact No Impact Be located on a site, which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Impact AnalysisThe Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List is a planning document used by the State and local agencies to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Below are the data resources that provide information regarding the facilities or sites identified as meeting the Cortese List requirements. List of Hazardous Waste and Substances sites from Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database. List of Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites from the State Water Board’s GeoTracker database. List of solid waste disposal sites identified by Water Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit. List of “active” CDO and CAO from Water Board. List of hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code, identified by DTSC. Based on a review of the Cortese List maintained by the California Environmental Protection Agency the Project site was not found on any list of hazardous materials sites.

MA21143 Madone Project
54 Threshold 4.9 (e) Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactFor a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the Project area? Impact AnalysisAirport Land Use CompatibilityThe nearest airport is Riverside Municipal Airport located approximately 2.25 miles southeast of the Project site. According to Map FL-1, Flabob Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, the Project site is not located within the airport compatibility zones.27Therefore there will be no impact on airport land use planning. Airport Noise The Project consists of single-family residences and will not expose people to excessive aircraft noise. The nearest airport is Flabob Airport located approximately 2.25 miles southeast of the Project site. According to Map FL-3, Noise Compatibility Contours Flabob Airport, Land Use Compatibility Plan, the Project site is located outside the 55 CNEL Noise Impact Zone.28The Riverside Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan states that single-family residential land uses are an acceptable land use within the 55 to 60 CNEL noise contour. Standard building design and construction methods would provide adequate noise attenuation to comply with the indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL and thereby not expose residents of the Project to excessive noise levels. 27Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, Riverside Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan,December 2004. Available at: https://www.rcaluc.org/Portals/13/PDFGeneral/plan/newplan/14-%20Vol.%201%20Flabob.pdf 28 Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, Riverside Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, December 2004. Available at: https://www.rcaluc.org/Portals/13/PDFGeneral/plan/newplan/14-%20Vol.%201%20Flabob.pdf MA21143 Madone Project
55 Threshold 4.9 (f) Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactImpair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?Impact AnalysisAccess to the Project site is proposed from Camino Real via Jurupa Road. The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities, nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route. During construction and long-term operation, the Project would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles. Project development and improvements will not result in a substantial alteration to the design or capacity of any public road that would impair or interfere with the implementation of evacuation procedures. Threshold 4.9 (g) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Impact AnalysisAccording to the General Plan29, the Project site is not located within a high wildfire hazard area. (Also refer to analysis under Issue 4.20, Wildfire). 4.10 Hydrology And Water Quality The following analysis is based in part on the following technical reports:Preliminary Drainage Study; Encompass Associates, Inc., May 6, 2021. (Appendix E).Preliminary WQMP, Encompass Associates, Inc; April 30, 2021. (Appendix F). Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter, Jurupa Community Services District, October 25, 2021. (Appendix G). 29 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Safety Element, Figure 8-10: Wildfire Severity Zones in Jurupa Valley.

MA21143 Madone Project
56 Threshold 4.10 (a) Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactViolate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Impact AnalysisPlans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to water quality and waste discharge requirements. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:PPP 4.10-1As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section B (1),any person performing construction work in the city shall comply with the provisions of this chapter, and shall control storm water runoff so as to prevent any likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. The City Engineer shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration and shall identify the manner of implementation. Documentation on the effectiveness of BMPs implemented to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City Engineer. PPP 4.10-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section B (2),any person performing construction work in the city shall be regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board in a manner pursuant to and consistent with applicable requirements contained in the General Permit No. CAS000002, State Water Resources Control Board Order Number 2009-0009-DWQ. The city may notify the State Board of any person performing construction work that has a non-compliant construction site per the General Permit.PPP 4.10-3 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section C, new development, or redevelopment projects shall control storm water runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water.

MA21143 Madone Project
57 Water Quality StandardsThe Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act30defines water quality objectives (i.e., standards) as “…the limits or levels of water quality constituents or characteristics which are established for the reasonable protection of beneficial uses of water or the prevention of nuisance within a specific area” [(§13050 (h)].31 Construction Impacts (Water Quality Standards)Construction of the Project would involve clearing, grading, paving, utility installation, building construction, and the installation of landscaping, which would result in the generation of potential water quality pollutants such as silt, debris, chemicals, paints, and other solvents with the potential to adversely affect water quality. As such, short-term water quality impacts have the potential to occur during construction activities in the absence of any protective or avoidance measures.The Municipal Code requires the Project to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Stormwater Permit for construction activities32. The permit is required for all Projects that include construction activities, such as clearing, grading, and/or excavation that disturb at least one acre of total land area. Compliance with the permit requires the preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for construction-related activities, including grading. The plan would specify the measures that would be required to implement during construction activities to ensure that all potential pollutants of concern are prevented, minimized, and/or otherwise appropriately treated prior to being discharged from the site. Operational Impacts (Water Quality Requirements) Storm water pollutants commonly associated with the type of land uses that could occupy the proposed structures include sediments, nutrients, trash and debris, bacteria and viruses, oil and grease, and pesticides. Pursuant to the requirements of the Municipal Code33, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required for managing the quality of storm water or urban runoff that flows from a developed site after construction is completed and the facilities or structures are occupied and/or operational. The Plan prepared for the Project (Appendix L), proposes todivert surface runoff to the water quality and storm detention basin located at the Southwest corner of the site.30 California Water Boards, Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, January 2019. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/laws_regulations/docs/portercologne.pdf 32City of Jurupa Valley, Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls. Available at: https://library.municode.com/ca/jurupa_valley/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT6HESA_CH6.05STWAURRUMADICO 33Ibid.

MA21143 Madone Project
58 Waste Discharge RequirementsWaste Discharge Requirements are issued by the Santa Ana Regional Board under the provisions of the California Water Code, Division 7 “Water Quality,” Article 4 “Waste Discharge Requirements.”34These requirements regulate the discharge of wastes which are not made to surface waters, but which may impact the region’s water quality by affecting underlying groundwater basins. Discharge requirements are issued for Publicly Owned Treatment Works’ wastewater reclamation operations, discharges of wastes from industries, subsurface waste discharges such as septic systems, sanitary landfills, dairies, and a variety of other activities which can affect water quality. Operational Impacts (Waste Discharge Requirements) To facilitate proper funding and management of sanitary sewer systems, the Jurupa Community Services District has adopted Sewer System Management Plan WDID 8SSO1058235(SSMP) thatincludes provisions to provide proper and efficient management, operation, and maintenance of sanitary sewer systems. Additionally, the SSMP contains a spill response plan that establishes standard procedures for immediate response to a sanitary sewer overflow in a manner designed to minimize water quality impacts and potential nuisance conditions. By connecting to the Jurupa Community Services District sewer system, the Project will not violate any waste discharge requirements. Threshold 4.10 (b) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Impact AnalysisGroundwater SuppliesAccording to the Water and Sewer Availability Letter issued for the Project (Appendix M), water service will be provided to the Project by the Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD). The district’s wells are located within the Chino Ground Water Basin. The Basin is adjudicated, which means if JCSD extracts water that exceeds the safe yield (i.e., the rate at which groundwater can be withdrawn without causing long-term decline of water levels, JCSD may incur a replenishment obligation, which is used by the Watermaster to recharge the ground water basin with State Water Project water. The Basin has been maintained by the Watermaster in a safe yield condition 34California Water Boards, Waste Discharge Requirements Program, July 3, 2020. Available at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/waste_discharge_requirements/35 https://www.jcsd.us/home/showdocument?id=1564.

MA21143 Madone Project
59 under this method of operation. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to contribute to a substantial depletion of groundwater supplies. Sustainable Groundwater ManagementThe Sustainable Groundwater Management Act requires governments and water agencies of high and medium priority basins to halt overdraft and bring groundwater basins into balanced levels of pumping and recharge. The act requires the prioritization of basins and subbasins based on a variety of factors such as population and number of water wells in a basin. Basins are ranked from very-low to high-priority. Basins ranking high- or medium-priority are required to form Groundwater Sustainability Agencies to manage basins sustainably and requires those agencies to adopt Groundwater Sustainability Plans. As noted above, the Project’s groundwater supplies come from an adjudicated basin. Adjudicated basins are exempt from the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) because such basins already operate under a court-ordered management plan to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Basin. No component of the Project would obstruct with or prevent implementation of the management plan for the Basin. As such, the Project’s construction and operation would not conflict with any sustainable groundwater management plan. Impacts would be less than significant. Threshold 4.10 (c). Would the Project: Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would:Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact (i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? (ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? (iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? Impact AnalysisExisting ConditionIn the existing condition site drainage sheet flows across the property from the northeast to the southwest corner of the property.

MA21143 Madone Project
60 Proposed ConditionIn the proposed condition, the existing drainage path will drain towards the water quality and underground infiltration basin located at the southwest corner of the site. During construction, the Project is also required to implement a Stormwater Pollution Control Plan per PPP 4.10-1.As proposed, the design of the storm drain system will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or impede or redirect flood flows. Threshold 4.10 (d). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or SignificantImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant ImpactNo Impact In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Impact AnalysisAccording to the General Plan36,the Project site is not located within a flood hazard zone.According to the California Department of Conservation, California Official Tsunami Inundation Maps37, the site is not located within a tsunami inundation zone. In addition, the Project would not be at risk from seiche because there is no water body in the area of the Project site capable of producing as seiche. Threshold 4.10 (e) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant ImpactNo Impact Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Impact AnalysisAs discussed under Threshold 4.10 (a) and 4.10 (c), with implementation of the drainage system improvements and features as described, the Project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan. As discussed under Threshold 4.10 (b), the 36 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Figure 8-9: Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).37 California Department of Conservation, California Official Tsunami Inundation Maps, https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps#:~:text=Coordinated%20by%20Cal%20OES%2C%20California,considered%20tsunamis%20for%20each%20area., accessed August 30, 2020.

MA21143 Madone Project
61 Project site is not subject to a Sustainable Groundwater Water Management program and will not substantially impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin 4.11 Land Use And PlanningThreshold 4.11 (a) Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Physically divide a community? Impact AnalysisAn example of a Project that has the potential to divide an established community includes the construction of a new freeway or highway through an established neighborhood. The Project is in an area largely characterized by residential development and school use. The Project site is bordered by Jurupa Road to the north, Camino Real to the east, Kirby Drive to the west, and Camino Real Elementary School to the south. As such, the Project will not divide an established community. Threshold 4.11 (b). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Impact AnalysisA General Plan Amendment (GPA) is being proposed to change the designation of this property to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) which would allow for development of single-family uses at a density of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. A corresponding change of zone (CZ) is also proposed to reclassify the site as Planned Development (R-4). The proposed Project would implement these new designations through a development plan that consists of 35 lots for single-family detached housing on 6.92 acres (5 units/acre) as shown in the proposed site plan (see previous Figure 3.2, Conceptual Site Plan).The applicable plans and policies relating to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project (including, but not limited to the MA21143 Madone Project
62 general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect are summarized below. South Coast Air Quality Management District 2016 Air Quality Management PlanRefer to Threshold 4.3 (a) in Section 4.2, Air Quality. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation PlanRefer to Threshold 4.4 (f) in Section 4.4, Biological Resources.California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan Refer to Threshold 4.8 (b) in Section 4.8,Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Southern California Association of Governments Connect SoCal – The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities StrategyRefer to Threshold 4.8 (b) in Section 4.8,Greenhouse Gas Emissions.Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control ProgramRefer to Threshold 4.10 (e) in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality.As demonstrated throughout this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation, including but not limited to the General Plan, or the with implementation of the PPP’s and Mitigation Measures throughout this Initial Study. 4.12 Mineral Resources Threshold 4.12 (a). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Impact AnalysisAccording to the General Plan38the Project site is located within Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) 3, which is defined as “Areas containing known or inferred mineral occurrences of undetermined mineral resources significance.” However, no mineral resource extraction activity is known tohave ever occurred on the Project site. Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or the residents of the State of California. 38 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Figure 4-16: Jurupa Valley Mineral Resources.

MA21143 Madone Project
63 Threshold 4.12 (b). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactResult in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Impact AnalysisThe General Plan Open Space, Mineral Resources (OS-MIN) land use designation is intended for mineral extraction and processing and includes areas held in reserve for future mineral extraction and processing.39The Project site is delineated as Country Neighborhood (LDR). Therefore, the Project is not delineated on the General Plan, a specific plan, or other land use plan as a locally important mineral resource recovery site. 4.13 Noise The following analysis is based in part on the following technical report: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis, prepared by LSA, dated October 5, 2021 and is included as Appendix H. Threshold 4.13 (a). Would the Project: PotentiallySignificant or Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?Impact AnalysisExisting Ambient Noise Levels The primary source of noise in the area is from vehicle traffic from Jurupa Road and Camino Real, and freight train operations on the Union Pacific Railroad, which ranges from a daytime range of 44.5 to 78.7 dBA and a night time range of 35.2 to 55.1 dBA. Noise Receiver Locations 39 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Land Use Element, p.2-28.

MA21143 Madone Project
64 Table 4.13-1 24-Hour Ambient Noise Levels at Receiver LocationsLocationDescriptionAverage Noise Level(dBA Leq)DaytimeNighttimeLT-1Southern edge of project site, near Camino Real Elementary School.54.4 42.9LT-2 West side of Kirby Drive, on utility pole. Approximately 185 feet south of centerline of Jurupa Road.55.1 43.7LT-3 4495 Corte Entrada, in the back yard. Approximately 60 feet north of centerline of Jurupa Road.56.243.9Source: Noise Impact Analysis (Appendix H).Figure 4.12-1 Noise Measurement Locations

MA21143 Madone Project
65 Construction Noise Impact AnalysisNoise levels associated with the construction will vary with the different types of construction equipment. Table 4.13-2, Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels identifies the level of noise generated by construction equipment.Table 4.13-2. Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels The City’s criteria for determining if construction noise results in a significant CEQA impact is as follows:1)The project is inconsistent with General Plan Policy NE 3.5: Construction Noise which states: “Limit commercial construction activities adjacent to or within 200 feet of residential uses to weekdays, between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., and limit high-noise-generating construction activities (e.g., grading, demolition, pile driving) near sensitive receptors to weekdays between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.”The southern boundary of the Project site is shared with Camino Real Elementary Schoolproperty. Therefore, the Project contractors must limit construction activities during the days and times required by Mitigation Measure NOI-1. 2) Construction noise levels exceed the levels identified in the latest version of the Federal Transit Administration Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.

MA21143 Madone Project
66 Construction noise will have a temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise level above the existing within the Project vicinity. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Noise levels will be loudest during the site preparation phase.The construction noise levels are expected to range from 77.6 dBA Leq at Camino Real Schoolapproximately 100 feet to the nearest structure to the south and 75.1 dBA Leq to the closest residential uses approximately 140 feet to the west. The construction noise analysis shows that the nearest receiver locations will satisfy the daytime 80 dBA Leq significance threshold established by the Federal Transit Administration Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Although construction noise levels do not exceed the noise threshold, sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site will be exposed to higher noise levels. To reduce construction impacts to the school and residential uses to the maximum extent feasible, the following mitigation measure is required. Mitigation Measure(s) MM-NOI-1-Construction Noise Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following notes be included on grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors.“a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the months of October through May.b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards.c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site.d) Construction equipment staging areas shall be located the greatest distance between the staging area and the nearest sensitive receptors.”Off-Site Operational Traffic Noise ImpactsAccording to Caltrans, the human ear is able to begin to detect sound level increases of 3 decibels (dB) in typical noisy environments.40A doubling of sound energy (e.g., doubling the volume of traffic on a highway) that would result in a 3-dBA increase in sound, would generally be barely detectable. The Project expects to generate a maximum of 340 daily trips at full occupancy. It takes a doubling of traffic to create a +3 dBA noise impact. Primary site access is via Camino Real and Jurupa Road 40 Caltrans, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, April 2020, p.7-1.

MA21143 Madone Project
67 with existing ADT volumes of 6,843 and 8,499, respectively as indicated in the City of Jurupa General Plan. The addition of 340 trips would create a minimal noise increase of less than 0.2 dBA.ConclusionWith implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 and PPP 4.13-1, the Project’s noise impacts will not result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.Threshold 4.13 (b). Would the Project: PotentiallySignificant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant Impact No Impact Result in the generation of excessive ground-bornevibration or ground-borne noise levels? Impact AnalysisThis analysis focuses on the potential ground-borne vibration associated with vehicular traffic and construction activities. Ground-borne vibration levels from automobile traffic are generally overshadowed by vibration generated by heavy trucks that roll over the same uneven roadway surfaces. However, due to the rapid drop-off rate of ground-borne vibration and the short duration of the associated events, vehicular traffic-induced ground-borne vibration is rarely perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way, and rarely results in vibration levels that cause damage to buildings in the vicinity. However, while vehicular traffic is rarely perceptible, construction has the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary ground vibration, depending on the specific construction activities and equipment used. Ground vibration levels associated with various types of construction equipment are summarized in Table 4.13-3.

MA21143 Madone Project
68 Table 4.13-3 Vibration Source Levels for Construction EquipmentThe closest structure to the Project property line is minimally 100 feet from the property line at the Camino Real School to the south. The estimated construction vibration level from a large bulldozer (worst case scenario) measured at 25-feet would create a vibration level of 0.089 in/sec and 0.011 at the closet structure, which does not exceed the 0.2 in/sec threshold. Threshold 4.13 (c). Would the Project:PotentiallySignificantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpactNoImpactFor a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?Impact AnalysisThe Project consists of single-family residences and will not expose people to excessive aircraft noise. The nearest airports are Flabob Airport, Riverside Municipal Airport, and Ontario International Airport which are 2.3 mi southeast, 3.4 mi south, and 8.4 mi northwest of the project site, respectively. The future airport noise contours for Flabob Airport and Riverside Municipal Airport based on the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission 2004) shows that the project site is outside the 55 dBA CNEL noise contour. Also, the airport noise contour for Ontario International Airport based on

MA21143 Madone Project
69 the Compatibility Policy Map: Noise Impact Zones from the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (City of Ontario 2011) shows that the project site is outside the 60 to 65 dBA CNEL noise contour. Therefore, the project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft operations. Standard building design and construction methods would provide adequate noise attenuation to comply with the indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL and thereby not expose residents of the Project to excessive noise levels. 4.14 Population And HousingThreshold 4.14 (a). Would the Project:Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than SignificantImpact No Impact Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Impact AnalysisThe Project site is located in a developed area of the City and is served by existing water and sewer facilities, gas and electric utilities, and improved roadways. No additional infrastructure will be needed to serve the Project other than connection to infrastructure adjacent to the site.Based on the California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2020-2022, the City’s population as of January 1, 2022 is 107,083 with a ratio of persons per household of 3.75.41Based on the number of dwelling units times 3.75 persons per dwelling unit, the proposed Project would increase the City’s population by approximately 131 persons assuming all residents came from outside the City. (3.75 persons/du with 35 units). An increase of 131 in relation to the current population of 105,384 represents an increase of 0.13 % and would not induce substantial population growth. 41 https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2022/ MA21143 Madone Project
70 Threshold 4.14 (b). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactDisplace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Impact AnalysisThe Project site consists of undeveloped vacant land. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not displace a substantial number of existing housing, nor would it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 4.15 Public Services Threshold 4.15 (a). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? 2) Police protection? 3) Schools? 4) Parks? 5) Other public facilities? FIRE PROTECTION Impact Analysis Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) MA21143 Madone Project
71 The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to fire protection. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance: PPP 4.15-1The Project applicant shall comply with all applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire prevention and suppression measures relating to water improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire access, access gates, combustible construction, water availability, and fire sprinkler systems.PPP 4.15-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, the Project is required to pay a Development Impact Fee that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for public services that would be created by the Project. The Riverside County Fire Department provides fire protection services to the Project area. The Project would be primarily served by the Riverside County West Riverside Fire Station No. 18located approximately 0.5 roadway miles north of the Project site at 7545 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, CA. Development of the Project would impact fire protection services by placing an additional demand on existing fire protection resources should its resources not be augmented. To offset the increased demand for fire protection services, the Project would be conditioned by the City to provide a minimum of fire safety and support fire suppression activities, including compliance with State and local fire codes, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, paved access, and secondary access routes. In addition, as required by the City’s Inter-Agency Project Review Request process, the Project plans were routed to the Fire Department for review and comment on the impacts to providing fire protection services. The Fire Department did not indicate that the Project would result in the need for new or physically altered fire facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives. Furthermore, the Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for fire protection services.42Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share funds for the provision of additional public services, including fire protection services, which may be applied to fire facilities and/or equipment, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for fire protection services that would be created by the Project. Based on the above analysis, with implementation of PPP 4.14-1 and PPP 4.14-2, impacts related to fire protection are less than significant. 42 City of Jurupa Valley, Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, Development Impact Fee, June 10, 2020. Available at: https://www.jurupavalley.org/168/Municipal-Code MA21143 Madone Project
72 POLICE PROTECTION Impact Analysis Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) The following applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to police protection. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance: PPP 4.15-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, the Project is required to pay a Development Impact Fee that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for public services that would be created by the Project. The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department provides community policing to the Project area via the Jurupa Valley Station located at 7477 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, CA. The Project would increase the demand for police protection services. The Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for public services, including police protection services43. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides its fair share of funds for additional police protection services, which may be applied to sheriff facilities and/or equipment, to offset the incremental increase in the demand that would be created by the Project. In addition, as required by the City’s Inter-Agency Project Review Request process, the Project plans were routed to the Sheriff’s Department for review and comment on the impacts to providing police protection services. The Sheriff’s Department did not indicate that the Project would result in the need for new or physically altered sheriff facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives.Based on the above analysis, with implementation of PPP 4.15-2, impacts related to police protection are less than significant. SCHOOLS Impact Analysis Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to schools. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance: 43 Ibid.

MA21143 Madone Project
73 PPP 4.15-3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant shall pay required development impact fees to the Jurupa Unified School District following protocol for impact fee collection. The Project proposes thirty-five (35) new single family residential units that may directly create additional students to be served by the Jurupa Unified School District. However, the Project would be required to contribute fees to the Jurupa Unified School District in accordance with the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (Senate Bill 50). Pursuant to Senate Bill 50, payment of school impact fees constitutes complete mitigation under CEQA for Project-related impacts to school services. PARKS Impact Analysis Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to parks. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:PPP 4.15-4Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008. The Project proposes thirty-five (35) new housing units that may increase the overall population of the City (assuming some residents will come from outside the city limits) and generate additional need for parkland. The payment of development impact fees will reduce any indirect Project impacts related to parks. OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES Impact Analysis Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) The following apply to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to parks. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance: PPP 4.15-2 above is applicable to the Project. As noted in the response to Issue 4.14(a), Population and Housing, of this Initial Study, development of the Project would add approximately 131 persons to the population of the City assuming that all new residents come from outside the City limits. This low number of persons in relation to the current population of 107,083 would not significantly increase the demand for public services, including public health services and library services which would require the construction of new or expanded public facilities.

MA21143 Madone Project
74 The Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for public services. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share of funds for additional public services. These funds may be applied to the acquisition and/or construction of public facilities.44Based on the above analysis, with implementation of PPP 4.14-2above, impacts related to other public facilities are less than significant. 4.16 Recreation Threshold 4.16 (a). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant ImpactNo Impact Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Impact Analysis Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP)The following applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to other public facilities. These measures will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to ensure compliance:PPP 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008. As noted in the response to Issue 4.14(a), Population and Housing, of this Initial Study, development of the Project would add approximately 131 persons to the population of the City assuming that all new residents come from outside the City limits. This low number of persons in relation to the City population of 107,083 would not cause a substantial physical deterioration of any recreational facilities or would accelerate the physical deterioration of any recreational facilities. The payment of Development Impact Fees will reduce any indirect Project impacts related to recreational facilities. 44 Ibid.

MA21143 Madone Project
75 Threshold 4.16 (b). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less ThanSignificantImpact No ImpactInclude recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Impact AnalysisAs noted in the response to Issue 4.14(a), Population and Housing, of this Initial Study, development of the Project would add approximately 131 persons to the population of the City assuming that all new residents come from outside the City limits. This low number of persons in relation to the City population of 107,083 would not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse effect on the environment. In addition, no offsite parks or recreational improvements are proposed or required as part of the Project. 4.17 Transportation The following analysis is based in part on the following technical reports: TTM No. 38151 Madone Collection (MA21143) Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis, LSA Associates, Inc., dated August 28, 2022 and is included as Appendix I. VMT Mitigation Workbook, Madone Collection Residential Project, City of Jurupa Valley, date August 25, 2022 and is included as Appendix J. Threshold 4.17(a). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant ImpactNo Impact Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Impact AnalysisThe City is served by transit service by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), the closest route to the Project site is Route 49 on Mission Boulevard approximately .44 miles north along Camino real and .75 miles north east along Jurupa Road. The Project is not proposing any improvements that would interfere with current transit serviceor bicycle travel. In addition, the Project will provide adequate pedestrian facilities, including upgrading the existing sidewalks along public streets abutting the site, as necessary.

MA21143 Madone Project
76 Threshold 4.17(b). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactConflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Impact AnalysisChanges to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines were adopted in December 2018, which require all lead agencies to adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a replacement for automobile delay-based level of service (LOS) as the new measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. This statewide mandate took effect July 1, 2020. Impacts related to LOS will be evaluated through the City’s development review process apart from CEQA. The Jurupa Valley Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelinesprovide several screening thresholds for determining if a VMT analysis is required. A project VMT analysis would not be required if a project is located in a Transit Priority Area (TPA) or a low VMT area, or if the project is a local serving retail project or other neighborhood use, including projects that generate fewer than 250 daily trips. Based on the TTM No. 38151 Madone Collections (MA 21143) Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Technical Memorandum,the proposed Project will not screen-out, requiring a full VMT analysis. The full VMT analysis and forecasting used the Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model (RivTAM) to determine if the Project would have a significant VMT impact. The analysis included ‘Project generated VMT’ and ‘Project effect on VMT estimates for the Project Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) using the following scenarios: Baseline Conditions. Baseline Plus Project Conditions. Cumulative No Project Conditions. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. Under the VMT methodology, a project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if, for residential projects, in the Baseline Plus Project scenario the net VMT per capita exceeds the City’s average VMT per capita. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS Table 4.17-1 summarizes the base year citywide average/significant threshold and project VMT per capita. The Project VMT/Capita was estimated utilizing RIVCOM model runs consistent with the methodology recommended in the City’s TIA Guidelines.

MA21143 Madone Project
77 Table 4.17-1 Base Year City and Project VMT Summary City*ProjectDifference Percentage Difference Significant Impact21.9 28.1 6.2 28.31 % YesSource: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Appendix I)Project Significant VMT Impact As shown above, the proposed Project Average VMT/Capita is 28.31 %above the City average base year VMT/Capita and based on the criteria outlined in this report, the proposed Project exceeds the existing City of Jurupa Valley VMT/Capita and thus has a significant transportation impact.Cumulative Significant VMT ImpactAccording to the City of Jurupa Valley Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (dated August 2020), if a project is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than significant. Because the proposed Project is not consistent with the RTP/SCS, the cumulative impacts are considered to be significant and, hence, a cumulative analysis was required and conducted. Table 4.17-2 summarizes the citywide average/ significant threshold and the project VMT per capita for the cumulative year. Table 4.17-2 Cumulative Year City and Project VMT Summary City*ProjectDifference Percentage Difference Significant Impact22.5 27.8 5.3 23.55 % YesSource: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Appendix I) As shown above, the proposed Project Average VMT/Capita for the cumulative year is 23.55 %above the City average VMT/Capita for the cumulative year, resulting in a significant impact.Based on the Guidelines, when project VMT exceeds the threshold of significance, the project will need to mitigate its CEQA transportation impact. Projects must propose mitigation measures, strategies, or project design features to reduce project VMT. The following VMT-reducing mitigation measures, strategies, and project design features are recommended based on the Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), August 2010.

MA21143 Madone Project
78 The following Mitigation Measures are required: MM-VMT-1 Electrical Vehicle Charging: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, construction drawings/plans shall include Level 2 electric vehicle charging plugs in at least 50% of the proposed 35 units.MM-VMT-2 Sidewalk Connections:Prior to the issuance of a building permit, street improvement plans shall show sidewalks within the development that connect to the existing sidewalk to the south on Camino Real and to the existing crosswalks at Jurupa Road. The following are listed as mitigation measures; however, they are project design features that are included in the MMRP and as conditions of approval for the Project.VMT-3 High Destination Accessibility: Benefit to walking distance to area schools and Mission Boulevard transit corridor. VMT-4 Traffic Calming and Safety Measures:Provide for the placement/refreshing of high-visibility crosswalks at 5 locations determined by the City.VMT-5 Improve Transit (Bus Shelter): Provide one (1) bus shelter along Mission Boulevard. Location to be determined by City and RTA. Impacts With Mitigation:Table 4.17-3 shows the resulting reductions after application of MM VMT-1, MM-VMT-2 and VMT-3 through VMT-5. Table 4.17-3 VMT Reduction: VMT- 1 –Electric Vehicle Charging StationsT-143.9 %VMT-2 –Sidewalks and Pedestrian ImprovementsT-180.16 % Project Design FeaturesVMT-3 –High Destination Accessibility T-31A1.0 %VMT-4 –Traffic Calming & Safety MeasuresT-3517.5 % VMT-5 –Improve Transit (Bus Shelter)T-461.0 %Total VMT Mitigation Reduction23.56 %Unmitigated VMT 27.8Mitigated VMT21.25 Threshold 22.5Source: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Appendix I) With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, strategies, and Project Design Features, the project VMT is anticipated to decrease to 21.25 miles per capita, which is below the cumulative year City’s threshold of 22.5. Therefore, the project’s impacts under CEQA for traffic and transportation will be less than significant after mitigation. MitigationCAPCOA Reference VMT Reduction/VMT MA21143 Madone Project
79 Threshold 4.17(c). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactSubstantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?Impact AnalysisAccess to the site is already in place from the roadways abutting the Project site. The Project is proposing the following street improvements that will meet City standards. Camino Real improvement recommendations include: North Bound: One 12-foot-wide left turn lane, one 12-foot wide through lane, one 13-foot through lane/right turn lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road).South Bound: One 13-foot wide through lane, one 12-foot wide through lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road).6-foot-wide raised median for future UPRR gate assembly. 18-foot-wide west parkway.In addition, the Project is a located in an area developed with residential and school uses, and as such, would not be incompatible with existing development in the surrounding area to the extent that it would create a transportation hazard because of an incompatible use.Threshold 4.17(d). Would the Project: Potentially Significant or Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess Than Significant ImpactNo Impact Result in inadequate emergency access? Impact AnalysisThe Project would take access from existing roadways abutting the site including Jurupa Road, Camino Real, and Kirby Drive. During the course of the preliminary review of the Project, the Project’s transportation design was reviewed by the City’s Engineering Department, County Fire Department, and County Sheriff’s Department to ensure that adequate access to and from the site would be provided for emergency vehicles. In addition, the Project is located in a developed area with residential and school uses. The Project would not be incompatible with existing MA21143 Madone Project
80 development in the surrounding area to the extent that it would create a transportation hazard because of an incompatible use. 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources The following analysis is based in part on the following technical report:Cultural Resources Assessment, LSA Associates, Inc., dated October 2021 and is included as Appendix C. Threshold 4.18 (a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? Impact AnalysisHistoric Context Research identified the current Project area as a general location associated with Native American occupation and/or use during prehistoric and protohistoric periods. It is also an area associated with historic Mexican period rancho activity, American period ranching and farming activity, and, more recently, recreational activity. The Project site is located in a general location associated with Native American occupation and/or use during prehistoric and protohistoric periods. It is also an area associated with historic Mexican period rancho activity, American period ranching and farming activity, and, more recently, recreational activity.Research and ConclusionsA record search was conducted at the University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center, Riverside, for the Project site. This search included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites within a one-mile radius of the Project site. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest (PHI), the listing of California Historical Landmarks (CHL), the California Register of Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) were checked. Historic maps were also reviewed. The California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Eastern Information Center (EIC) indicated that 38 surveys were completed within a one-mile radius of the project site. The EIC MA21143 Madone Project
81 records search and literature review revealed 18 cultural resources recorded within one-mile of the Project Site. None of the other recorded resources will be impacted by the proposed Project. The remnants of the structures (residence and shed/bunkhouse) were damaged in a recent fire and as found in the Cultural Resources Assessment While uncommon, the buildings’ methods of construction (adobe with mud-sill floors, various siding materials and composition roofing) are not unique and there is no surface indication of associated subsurface deposits. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-3will ensure impacts remain less than significant.Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-3will address if any historic cultural resources are also historic tribal cultural resources.In addition, research failed to identify any National Register of Historic Places properties; no California State Landmarks; no California Register of Historical Resources; nor any California Points of Historical Interest in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. Threshold 4.18 (b)Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? California Native American Cultural Places (SB18)Senate Bill (SB) 18 created a process for consultation with California Native American Tribes in the CEQA process. Prior to the adoption or any amendment of a general plan or specific plan, a local government must notify the appropriate tribes (on the contact list maintained by the NAHC) of the opportunity to conduct consultations for the purpose of preserving, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places located on land within the local government's jurisdiction that is affected by the proposed plan adoption or amendment. Tribes have 90 days from the date on which they receive notification to request consultation, unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe (Government Code §65352.3). The Planning Department notified the area California Native American Tribes per the requirements of SB-18. The Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and Soboba Band Luiseño Indians requested consultations. As a result of the consultations the Mitigation Measures noted below are required for the Project.

MA21143 Madone Project
82 Tribal Cultural Resources consist of the following.1. A tribal cultural resource listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources.2. Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: (A) Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. (B) Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. 3. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Native American scoping, pursuant to the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52, was initiated by a request of the Native American Heritage Commission for a Sacred Lands File search and AB 52 contacts list on September 7, 2018. The NAHC responded by letter on September 24, 2018. The NAHC has no evidence that sacred lands are present on the Project site Assembly Bill (AB) 52 created a process for consultation with California Native American Tribes in the CEQA process. Tribal Governments can request consultation with a lead agency and give input into potential impacts to tribal cultural resources before the agency decides what kind of environmental assessment is appropriate for a proposed project. The Planning Department notified the following California Native American Tribes per the requirements of AB52: Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation Soboba Band Luiseño IndiansSan Manuel Band of Mission IndiansTorres Martinez Band of Cahuilla Indians.Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla IndiansAs a result of the SB-18 and AB-52 consultation process, the following mitigation measures are required: Mitigation Measure(s)MM- TCR-1: Native American Monitoring Agreement. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Permit Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with the Consulting Tribe(s) for Native American Monitor(s) to be onsite during ground disturbing activities allowed by the grading permit. A Consulting Tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed MA21143 Madone Project
83 AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b). Ground disturbing activities and include excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, grading and trenching.The Monitoring Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, the following provisions:a) Provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice to the Consulting Tribe(s) of all ground disturbing activities.b) In conjunction with the Archaeological Monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measure CR-1 under Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21347, the Native American Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources. c) The onsite monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Native American Tribal Monitor(s) have indicated that all upcoming ground disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. The Project Proponent shall submit a fully executed copy of the Monitoring Agreement to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this mitigation measure. If there are multiple Consulting Tribes involved, a separate Monitoring Agreement is required for each. The Monitoring Agreement shall not modify any condition of approval or mitigation measure. MM-TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery: The Permit Applicant or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of the grading permit. If, during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed: a) Ground disturbing activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. Ground disturbing activities are allowed on the remainder of the Project Site.b) The Consulting Tribe(s), the Project Archaeologist (retained by the Permit Applicant under Mitigation Measure CR-1, Retain Professional Archaeologist, of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration document for MA21143), and the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department shall meet and confer, and discuss the find with respect to the following:1. Determine if the resource is a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined by Public Resources Code §21074, if so:2. Determine if the resource is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register on a “Local register of historical or resources” pursuant to Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k); or3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code § 5024.1 (c) as it pertains to the Consulting Tribe(s): (1) Is associated with events that have made a MA21143 Madone Project
84 significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage, (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past, (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values, or (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.c)If the resource(s) are Native American in origin [and not a historical resource as defined by Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k) or §5024.1 (c)], the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Consulting Tribe (s) deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If multiple Consulting Tribes (s) are involved, and a mutual agreement cannot be reached asto the form and manner of disposition of the resource(s), the City shall request input from the Native American Heritage Commission and render a final decision.d)If the resource(s) is both a tribal cultural resource and a historic resource, the Project Archaeologist, the Consulting Tribe (s), and the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department shall meet and confer and discuss the appropriate treatment (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural and historic resource. Treatment, at a minimum, shall be consistent with Public Resources Code § 21084.3 (b). The appropriate treatment shall be prepared in conjunction with the Archaeological Treatment plan required by Mitigation Measure CR-2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until the appropriate treatment has been accomplished. MM-TCR-3: Final Report: If a Tribal cultural resource is also a historic resource defined above, the resource shall be included in the Final Report required by Mitigation Measure CR-2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143. 4.19 Utilities And Service Systems The following analysis is based in part on the “Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter”, Jurupa Community Services District, dated August 28, 2019 and is included as Appendix G.

MA21143 Madone Project
85 Threshold 4.19 (a). Would the Project:Potentially Significantor Significant ImpactLess than Significant with Mitigation IncorporatedLess ThanSignificantImpact NoImpactRequire or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Impact AnalysisWater ServiceThe Project will connect to the existing water service available from both the existing 18-inch waterline in Camino Real, an existing 8-inch waterline in Kirby Drive, or existing 12-inch and 24-inch waterlines north of Jurupa Road. Sewer Service The Project will connect to the existing sewer service available from the existing 8-inch diameter line in Kirby Road. Storm Drainage Improvements Drainage for the Project will consist of storm drains, catch basins, and an underground water quality and infiltration basin. The site drains from the northeast to the southwest through the proposed storm drain lines and conveyed to the water quality and infiltration basin located in the southeast corner of the project site. High flows will be conveyed through an existing storm drain located along the southern boundary of the property. Electric Power Facilities The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Edison electrical distribution facilities available in the vicinity of the Project site. Natural Gas Facilities The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Gas natural gas distribution facilities available in the vicinity of the Project site. Telecommunication Facilities Telecommunication facilities include a fixed, mobile, or transportable structure, including, all installed electrical and electronic wiring, cabling, and equipment, all supporting structures, such as utility, ground network, and electrical supporting structures, and a transmission pathway and associated equipment in order to provide cable TV, internet, telephone, and wireless telephone services to the Project site. Services that are not provided via satellite will connect to existing facilities maintained by the various service providers.

Jurupa Valley City CouncilNovember 17, 2022

Jurupa Valley City Council
November 17, 2022