Agenda — Jurupa Valley City Council, April 6, 2023

Page - 1 -

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, April 6, 2023
Study Session: 6:00 p.m.

Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR STUDY SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

2. STUDY SESSION
A. MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 22327: PRE -APPLICATION
REVIEW (PAR) FOR 25 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON 9.7 ACRES LOCATED AT 8600 54 th STREET (APN: 166 -120-001); (APPLICANT: BETA STONE DEVELOPMENT LLC)

A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.

B. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.

C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.

Page - 2 -

Requested Action: That the City Council receive an introduction of the proposed project; and identify areas of concern and/or request additional information.

3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member

4. INVOCATION

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

7. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES -
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
B. PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING “DONATE LIFE MONTH”
C. NORTHWEST MOSQUITO A ND VECTOR CONTROL DI STRICT –

PRESENTED BY ERIC BA LLEJOS, PUBLIC INFOR MATION AND

TECHNOLOGY OFFICER

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.

Page - 3 -

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. UPDATE ON THE INTERAGENCY COORDINATING COUN CIL
MEETING OF MARCH 24, 2023

2. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF

GOVERNMENTS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING OF
APRIL 3, 2023

B. COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE ALTAMIRANO

1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY -

REGIONAL CONSERVATON AUTHORITY MEETING OF
APRIL 3, 2023

C. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY MEETING
OF MARCH 23, 2023

2. UPDATE ON THE METROLINK / SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY MEETING OF MARCH 24, 2023

3. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS
AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 27, 2023

4. UPDATE ON THE METROLINK / SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY – AUDIT AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 31, 2023

5. UPDATE ON THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING
OF APRIL 6, 2023

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

12. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT UPDATE

Requested Action: That the City Council receive and file the report.

13. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. MARCH 16, 2023 REGULAR MEETING

Page - 4 -

14. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.

B. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$3,225,021.47
Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated February 23 and March 9,16, and 23, 2023 as well as the payroll registers dated February 28 and March 3 and 17, 2023.

C. APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR

THE TRANSFER OF SURPLUS LAND LOCATED IN THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY

Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-23, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF JUR UPA VALLEY AND THE COUNTY OF

RIVERSIDE FOR THE INTENTION TO CONVEY FEE SIMPLE

INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 156-200-004, 163-152- 025, 165 -183-013, 165 -190-034, 165 -190-043, 165 -190-045, 170 -270-024, 174 - 320-021, 174-320-022, 182-210-007, & 183 -122-004 BY QUITCLAIM DEED

TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
D. CITY COUNCIL INITIATION OF A MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO TITLE 5 AND TITLE 9 MODIFYING REGULATIONS FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS; CEQA DETERMINATION: THE INITIATION OF

A CODE AMENDMENT IS NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA
Requested Action: That the City Council, b y motion, initiate proceedings to consider a Municipal Code Amendment to Title 5 and Title 9 modifying regulations for massage establishments.

Page - 5 -

E. APPROVAL OF SALES AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE TWO
MULTIFUNCTION SHARP MX 8081 HIGH SPEED COLOR DOCUMENT

SYSTEMS

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the award of RFP 2022-23-08 to CBE Office Solutions for the purchase of two multifunction Sharp MX 8081 high speed color document systems not to exceed $29,605.61.

15. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

16. PUBLIC HEARINGS

17. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT (RHNA) COMPLIANCE

UPDATE- POTENTIAL SITES FOR RE-ZONING

Requested Action: That the City Council receive a staff presentation on potential sites to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and provide direction regarding how to proceed.

B. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF THE 2023 -2024 PUBLIC SERVICE GRANTS

Requested Action: That the City Council receive a presentation from Clásico de las Américas and provide input regarding the 2023-2024 Public Service Grants.

C. DISCUSSION OF A MEMBERSHIP IN THE LEAGUE OF CALFORNIA

CITIES AND EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES

Requested Action: That the City Council discuss the cost and benefits for a membership in the League of California Cities and/or cost benefit of budgeting for non-member training for educational and training opportunities through the League of California Cities.

18. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

19. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT

20. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS

21. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

Page - 6 -

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with respect to one matter of pending litigation: In re National Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, Case No. 1:17-md-2804 (Federal District Court N.D. Ohio).

22. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANY REPORTABLE ACTIONS I N CLOSED

SESSION

23. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of April 20, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be m ade available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 2.A
STUDY SESSION: MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 22327: PRE - APPLICATION REVIEW (PAR) FOR 25 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON 9.7 ACRES LOCATED AT 8600 54 th STREET (APN: 166- 120-001); (APPLICANT: BETA STONE DEVELOPMENT LLC)

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council receive an introduction of the proposed project; and

2. Identify areas of concern and/or request additional information.

STUDY SESSION PROCESS
This agenda item is an opportunity for the applicant to introduce the proposed project to the City Council and receive feedback. The City Council will not take any action on the proposed project. Each City Councilmember will have an opportunity to communicate to the applicant regarding any issues that should be addressed prior to the item be ing reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a future public hearing.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to construct a residential community consisting of 25 single-family detached homes on 9.7 acres of vacant land at 8600 54th Street (APN: 166-120-001) with a density of 2.57 dwelling units per acre.

PUDs allow design elements and development standards not otherwise permitted in conventional zones within the City’s Municipal Code. The proposed pro ject would be required to incorporate five (5) out of the nine (9) below-listed mandatory project features to be eligible for a PUD zoning approval. Incorporation of the minimum five (5) mandatory project features does not guarantee an approval of the PUD rezone.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

1. Residential clustering that will provide for new neighborhoods combined with abundant open space.

2. Commercial development that provides products or services not currently available within the City.

3. Preservation of abundant natural open space.

4. The project will provide a substantial public amenity, for example, a significant public plaza, a public park, trails or a similar improved open space feature, including provisions for guaranteed long -term maintenance not at the expense of the City.

5. The project includes significant environmental benefits, such as preservation, enhancement and/or creation of a significant natural feature or open spaces with a minimum area of one -half (½) acre.

6. Additional public benefits and project amenities tha t advance the City’s identified objectives and evolving visions as identified in the General Plan and/or any Specific Plans.

7. The project will achieve greater energy efficiency than standard developments through the incorporation of green building techni ques, scoring at least a silver rating on the LEED or other equivalent rating system, or achieving a minimum of thirty (30) percent greater energy efficiency than the minimum required by California Code of Regulations Title 24 .

8. The project provides for a significant saving of water usag e over the life of the project.

9. Stormwater runoff controls .

The proposed community would consist of 25 single-family detached homes on minimum 12,250 ft2 (0.28 acres) lots. The unit mix would consist of 13 two - (2) story homes, and 12 single-story homes with homes ranging in size from 2,648 ft2 to 3,320 ft2.

The community would consist of the following public street improvements and amenities:
improvements to 54 th Street; new streets with landscaped parkways , sidewalks, and streetlights; community trail; and public park. See Exhibit A for the conceptual site plan.

EXHIBIT A: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

Page | 3

The proposed project would require the following entitlements:

1. General Plan Amendment: Change General Plan Land Use from Country Neighborhood (Low Density Residential) – 1/2 acre minimum to Medium Density Residential (MDR) – 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre.

2. Change of Zone: Change Zoning from Light Agriculture (A -1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zone.

3. Tentative Tract Map: Subdivide existing 9.7-acre project site into 31 new lots for 25 single -family detached homes , private street s and an alley , common open space, and a drainage basin.

PROJECT LOCATION AND SURROUNDING AREA
The project site is located at 8600 54th Street in the central area of the City. The general neighborhood consists of residential uses ranging in density from 0.4 to three (3) dwelling units per acre, recreational uses, and vacant land. The immediate surrounding land uses include a single-family home and vacant land to the north, and single-family homes to the east, south, and west.

EXHIBIT B: SITE LOCATION

Page | 4

TABLE 1: GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 166-120-001
TOTAL ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE 9.7 acres
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION * Country Neighborhood (Low Density Residential) – 1/2 acre minimum
GENERAL PLAN OVERLAY Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay (ELO)
ZONING CLASSIFICATION * Light Agriculture (A-1)
* Proposed project would require change to General Plan Designation to Medium Density Residential (MDR) – 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and Zoning Classification to Planned Unit Development (PUD).

PROJECT DESIGN AND SITE LAYOUT
Architecture, Amenities, and Landscaping
The proposed community would incorporate a mix of American Farmhouse and California Ranch architecture with there being 13 two- (2) story homes, and 12 single-story homes.

No home would exceed 28 feet in height. See Exhibit C for proposed architectural elevations.

EXHIBIT C: PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS

Page | 5

The proposed community would include amenities such as: improvements to 54th Street including a new multi -purpose trail ; new internal streets with available s treet parking; drought tolerant landscaping in the form of ground shrubs, front yard trees, and street trees for beautification and reduction of the heat island effect; walls and privacy fencing; a drainage basin to manage excessive water runoff; and a 0.45 -acre public park. The public park would consist of shaded seating areas, walking paths, fruit trees and bushes, and play equipment for children. The passive recreational features (seating areas & fruits trees) would be located in the western section of the park, and the active recreational features (play equipment) would be located in the eastern section of the park. See Exhibit D for the proposed park.

EXHIBIT D: PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK

Off-Site Improvements, Access, Maintenance
The project site would primarily be accessed from 54th Street with two (2) separate points of ingress and egress. Residents would have full right -of-way (ROW) access (left in/out, right in/out) onto 54 th Street. There would also be a direct pedestrian -only connection to Agate Street from the southern end of the community. No gated entries are proposed.

The City has determined that the proposed internal circulation plan consisting of two (2) main streets looped by a private alley is unacceptable. As proposed, t he internal circulation will likely consist of the two (2) main streets dead ending as cul-de-sacs. The streets would be constructed to a ROW width of 56 feet with one (1) travel lane each way, street parking on both sides, and 10 -foot wide parkways on bot h sides with street trees and sidewalks. Residents would access their driveways directly from the street. It is recommended for landscaping to be adjacent to the curb to serve as a buffer for pedestrians and provide neighborhood beautification.

The proposed project would provide for several off-site improvements. The south side of 54th would be improved with a 10-foot wide parkway for curb and gutter, street trees and street lights, and a 14 -foot wide multi -purpose trail. See Exhibit E for the trail networ k.

The existing terminus of Agate Street south of the project site would also be improved with a cul-de-sac. At the time of development of the parcel(s) to the west of the project site, Agate Street would be extended north and its connection to 54 th Street would be completed.

Page | 6

EXHIBIT E: TRAIL NETWORK

The two (2) main streets, sidewalks, street trees, curbs, gutters, and drainage basin would be publicly owned and maintained through a community facilities district (CFD). The new multi-purpose trail on 54 th Street would be maintained by Jurupa Area Recreation and Parks District (JARPD). The public park would be maintained by the homeowner’s association but would also be accessible to the general public not residing in the proposed development. Individual homeowners would be responsible for the maintenance of their lots and homes.

CORE ISSUES

1. Horse Keeping. The applicant is proposing to construct a Planned Unit Development (PUD). A significant advantage of the PUD zone is that it allows and encourages innovative development projects through the flexible application of development standards. The project site is also located in the Equestrian Lifestyle Protection Overlay (ELO) which encourages new development within its boundaries to accommodate horse keeping, where feasible and appropriate.

There are several zoning classifications within the City that allow horse keeping but a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet is required for new developments , regardless of the zoning classification . Existing Light A griculture (A-1) lots, however, allow one (1) horse on lots that are up to 8,712 square feet in size, up to five (5) horses per acre. The City of Norco also allows one (1) horse on lots that are up to 12,500 square feet in size and zoned Agriculture Low Density (A-1). The lot sizes in the proposed community would range from 12,250 to 12,620 square feet. Given the flexibility of the PUD zone, and the project’s location within the ELO, it is recommended that the project include the non-commercial keeping of horses as a permitted use as the City already permits horse keeping on lots smaller than the one’s proposed, subject to development standards . Proximity to dwellings, structures, property lines, and other uses should be considered when developing PUD development standards e.g. set backs from adjacent homes. Other non- commercial animal keeping uses including sheep, goats, and chickens may also be considered.

2. Location of Public Park. The 0.45-acre public park is proposed to be located in the center of the proposed community. Although centrally located amenities are typically desired, the proposed location would make the park less accessible to the surrounding community and residents.

ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT PLANS

11/21/2022

11/21/2022
11/21/2022

ATTACHMENT 2: PERMISSION TO PUBLISH PLANS
1 Kumail RazaFrom:Jason Lee <[email protected]>Sent:Thursday, March 2, 2023 6:31 PMTo:Wayne Lu; formbstudio; Gabrielle NewmarkSubject:Re: Permission to Publish PlansHey Wayne,Thanks for the assist. I'm fine with our plans being published by the City.Kind Regards,Jason LeeCal Land Engineering & Associates, Inc.Office Address: 574 E. Lambert Rd.Brea, CA 92821Office: (714) 6711050 ext. 121Direct/Cell: (657) 2215512Email: [email protected]: (714) 6711090Website:www.callandeng.com From:Wayne Lu <[email protected]>Sent:Thursday, March 2, 2023 5:10 PMTo:formbstudio <[email protected]>; Gabrielle Newmark <[email protected]>; Jason Lee<[email protected]>Subject:FW: Permission to Publish PlansHello Ron, Gabrielle, and Jason,Please provide a brief statement/reply by email, that the City of Jurupa Valley has your permission to publish the plansassociated with the projectMA22327, also known as 8600 54thSt, Jurupa Valley, CA (APN# 166120001) in theirstaff report.I have a hearing with the city scheduled to discuss this project early April. Please kindly respond before theend of next week, March 10, 2023.Thank you! 2 Wayne LuAmalgam [email protected]:Kumail Raza <[email protected]>Sent:Thursday, March 2, 2023 10:00 AMTo:Wayne Lu <[email protected]>Subject:Permission to Publish PlansImportance:HighGood Morning Wayne,Could you please get a sign off in writing (email is fine) from the following firms that the City may publishtheir plans for MA22327 as attachments to the staff report?1.Form B Studio Inc.Architectural Plan Set2.Swamp PinkLandscape Plans3.Calland EngineeringTTMBest Regards, Kumail Raza | Senior PlannerCITY OF JURUPA VALLEY | T: 951.332.6464 ext. 2528930 Limonite Avenue | Jurupa Valley, CA [email protected] | jurupavalley.orgConnect with us on social media:Facebook | Instagram | Twitter*****CAUTION: THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF CLE. BE CAUTIOUS WHEN OPENING ANY LINKS OR DOCUMENTS.***** 1 Kumail RazaFrom:Gabrielle Newmark <[email protected]>Sent:Thursday, March 2, 2023 10:41 PMTo:Wayne Lu; formbstudio; Jason LeeSubject:Re: Permission to Publish PlansHello Wayne, I'm fine with my landscape plans being published by the City. Thank you. Gabrielle Newmark Swamp Pink Landscape Architecture 323.394.9693 www.swamppink.comCo-Founder, Program Director Industrial DistrictGreen(A Project of ADCCLA)Twitter:@GabrielleGreensInstagram: @industrial_district_green_laOn Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 06:31:31 PM PST, Jason Lee <[email protected]> wrote: Hey Wayne,Thanks for the assist. I'm fine with our plans being published by the City.Kind Regards,Jason LeeCal Land Engineering & Associates, Inc.Office Address: 574 E. Lambert Rd.Brea, CA 92821Office: (714) 6711050 ext. 121Direct/Cell: (657) 2215512Email: [email protected]: (714) 6711090Website:www.callandeng.com

2 From:Wayne Lu <[email protected]>Sent:Thursday, March 2, 2023 5:10 PMTo:formbstudio <[email protected]>; Gabrielle Newmark <[email protected]>; Jason Lee<[email protected]>Subject:FW: Permission to Publish PlansHello Ron, Gabrielle, and Jason, Please provide a brief statement/reply by email, that the City of Jurupa Valley has your permission to publish the plans associated with the project MA22327, also known as 8600 54th St, Jurupa Valley, CA (APN# 166-120-001) in their staff report.I have a hearing with the city scheduled to discuss this project early April. Please kindly respond before the end of next week, March 10, 2023. Thank you!Wayne Lu Amalgam Concepts 626-378-8171 [email protected] From: Kumail Raza <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 10:00 AM To: Wayne Lu <[email protected]> Subject: Permission to Publish Plans Importance: High Good Morning Wayne, Could you please get a sign off in writing (email is fine) from the following firms that the City may publish their plans for MA22327 as attachments to the staff report?1.Form B Studio Inc. - Architectural Plan Set2.Swamp Pink - Landscape Plans 3 3.Calland Engineering - TTMBest Regards,
Kumail Raza |Senior PlannerCITY OF JURUPA VALLEY | T: 951.332.6464 ext. 2528930 Limonite Avenue | Jurupa Valley, CA [email protected]|jurupavalley.orgConnect with us on social media:Facebook | Instagram | Twitter*****CAUTION: THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF CLE. BE CAUTIOUS WHEN OPENING ANY LINKS OR DOCUMENTS.***** 1 Kumail RazaFrom:formbstudio <[email protected]>Sent:Monday, March 6, 2023 7:24 AMTo:Wayne LuSubject:Re: FW: Permission to Publish PlansHi wayneThe City of Jurupa Valley has my permission to publish my landscape plans associated with the project MA22327, also known as 8600 54th St, Jurupa Valley, CA (APN# 166-120-001) in their staff report.Thank you.Ronald BallesterosForm B Studio , inc.10927 Downey Ave, Downey, CA 90241 562-861-3883On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 5:11 PM Wayne Lu <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Ron, Gabrielle, and Jason, Please provide a brief statement/reply by email, that the City of Jurupa Valley has your permission to publish the plans associated with the project MA22327, also known as 8600 54th St, Jurupa Valley, CA (APN# 166-120-001) in their staff report. I have a hearing with the city scheduled to discuss this project early April. Please kindly respond before the end of next week, March 10, 2023.Thank you! Wayne Lu Amalgam Concepts 2 [email protected]: Kumail Raza <[email protected]>Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 10:00 AM To: Wayne Lu <[email protected]>Subject: Permission to Publish Plans Importance: High Good Morning Wayne, Could you please get a sign off in writing (email is fine) from the following firms that the City may publish their plans for MA22327 as attachments to the staff report? 1. Form B Studio Inc. - Architectural Plan Set 2. Swamp Pink - Landscape Plans 3. Calland Engineering - TTM Best Regards, Kumail Raza | Senior PlannerCITY OF JURUPA VALLEY | T: 951.332.6464 ext. 2528930 Limonite Avenue | Jurupa Valley, CA [email protected] | jurupavalley.orgConnect with us on social media:Facebook | Instagram | Twitter-- 10927 Downey Avenue Suite D
3 Downey, CA [email protected]
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.A
-1-

MINUTES

OF THE REGULAR MEETING

OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
March 16, 2023

1. 5:30 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR STUDY SESSION ● Chris Barajas, Mayor
● Guillermo Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
● Leslie Altamirano, Council Member
● Brian Berkson, Council Member
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
Mayor Chris Barajas called the study session meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. Council Member Armando Carmona arrived at 5:35 p.m.

An announcement was made that Spanish translation services is available for anyone who needs this service.

2. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
A. STUDY SESSION TO REVIEW OPTIONS FOR THE ADOPTION AND

FORMATION OF A NEW PUBLIC SAFETY/FACILITIES/MAINTENANCE

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD)
City Manager Rod Butler introduced the City’s consulting team. Mr. Mark Pressman from Wulf Hanson and Heidi Schoeppe, from Webb Municipal Finance.

Mr. Mark Pressman gave a presentation regarding the adoption and formation of a new Public Safety/Facilities/Maintenance Community Facilities District (CFD) that would apply to all new development in Jurupa Valley. Ms. Schopee provided an overview of how Community Facility Districts are designed to place the cost burden for new infrastructure development and services solely on new development and its owners which provides a mechanism for new homeowners to pay for the new infrastructure development.

Brent Howard, representing Webb Municipal Finance, highlighted how the special taxes are levied in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment and are paid for by the property owners in the CFD. He outlined the items that can be funded through a CFD, such as libraries, local parks, school sites and structures, flood and storm protection facilities, public safety facilitie s, and other local government facilities.

Following discussion, the City Council provide d direction to staff following the presentation by the City’s consulting team and directed them to return with specific recommendations regarding the adoption and form ation of a new Public

RETURN TO AGENDA

-2-

Safety/Facilities/Maintenance Community Facilities District (CFD) that would apply to all new development in Jurupa Valley.

Mayor Chris Barajas called the regular meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.

4. INVOCATION was given by Pastor Kermit R. Perry from 3Ps Christian Ministries.

5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Brendan Kearns.

6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve the Agenda.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

7. PRESENTATIONS
A. RECOGNITION TO LIEUTENANT JASON SEXTON
Mayor Chris Barajas and members of the City Council recognized Lieutenant Jason Sexton for doing an exceptional job w hile serving as Jurupa Valley’s Chief of Police. Mayor Barajas presented Lieutenant Sexton with a Recognition Plaque and wished him well on his new assignment. Lieutenant Sexton introduced his successor, Lieutenant Sean Vickers.

B. UPDATE ON JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND P ARK DISTRICT
PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS – PRESENTED BY COLBY DIUGUID,

GENERAL MANAGER
Colby Diuguid, General Manager, presented an update on the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District . He highlighted some of their special events and services. Some of the upcoming events include the Spring Fling on Saturday, April 1; Meet the Machines Event on Saturday, April 15; Jump Fest, Saturday, May 5; Concerts in the Park; and the July 3 Independence Day Celebration.

-3-

C. PRESENTATION FROM RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION D ISTRICT – PRESENTED BY JASON

UHLEY, GENERAL MANAGER
Jason Uhley, General Manager, gave a presentation on the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. He gave an update on the various projects that have been approved for funding including the Santa Ana Levee Restoration and the Dodd Street Storm Drain project.

D. UPDATE OF JURUPA V ALLEY VETERANS HOUSI NG PROJECT AND OVER THE EDGE FUNDRAISER – PRESENTED BY LAURA

ROUGHTON, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY RIVERSIDE BOARD

PRESIDENT

Board President L aura Roughton introduced David Hahn, Executive Director at Habitat for Humanity Riverside, who gave an update on some of their programs and services. He provided an update on the Veterans Housing Project in Jurupa Valley and the “Over the Edge” fundraiser on May 20, 2023 . He announced that anyone interested in applying for one of the Veteran’s homes is encouraged to apply by visiting their website at: www.habitatriverside.org

E. PRESENTATION ON THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) – PRESENTED BY ERNIE PEREA, CEQA

ADMINISTRATOR

Ernie Perea, CEQA Administrator, gave a presentation on the California Environmental Quality Act.

8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Patrick Spangler voiced concern that he has been dealing with flooding in his neighborhood since 2017. Due to the sloping terrain of his property, it is susceptible to flooding. He asked that something be done to find a permanent solution.

An unidentified speaker voiced concern that he lives two houses away from the previous speaker. He noted that he has photos showing the mudslide surrounding his home. He asked for the City’s help to resolve this issue.

Colin Markovich, Field Rep resentative for Assembly Member Sabrina Cervantes, announced that her office in collaboration with Senator Richard Roth, Community Action Partnership of Riverside County, Golden State Opportunity, and Reach Out, will be hosting a “Tacos and Taxes” event. F or households earning $75,000 or less, individuals may receive assistance filing their taxes at no cost. The event will be held Saturday, March 25 from 9 am to 2 pm at the Reach Out Offices, 8300 Limonite Avenue. Appointments are preferred at (951) 951) 371-6860.

-4-

9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND

ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Armando Carmona commented on the workshop that was held at Troth Street Elementary School, where the flooding issues in Mira Loma and the proposed San Sevine - Dodd Street S torm Drain project were discussed. He thanked all those who attended and provided input. He thanked Riverside County Parks for inviting him to be part of the clean-up of the Mary Tyo Equestrian Staging Area. Additional clean up events will be scheduled soon. He shared his recent visit to the Riverside County Animal Shelter where he and his wife attended their free adoption event. He encouraged those looking for a new pet to visit the shelter as there are many beautiful animals in need of homes. He acknowledged his wife for her volunteer efforts with some of the animal rescue groups, adding that they recently brought home a new family member named “Clyde.”

10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING

REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

A. MAYOR CHRIS BARAJAS

1. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments - Executive Committee meeting of March 6, 2023.

2. Mayor Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments - Administration & Finance C ommittee meeting of March 8, 2023.

B. MAYOR PRO TEM GUILLERMO SILVA

1. Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva announced that he was unable to attend the Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District meeting of March 16, 2023, due to a scheduling conflict.

C. COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE ALTAMIRANO

1. Council Member Leslie Altamirano gave an update on the Western Riverside County – Regional Conservation Agency meeting of March 6, 2023.

D. COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN BERKSON

1. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Riverside County Transportation Commission meeting of March 8, 2023.

2. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Northwest Transportation Now Coalition meeting of March 9, 2023.

-5-

3. Council Member Brian Berkson gave an update on the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority – Audit and Finance Committee meeting of March 10, 2023.

4. Council Member Brian Berkson announced that the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee meeting of March 16, 2023 was canceled.

11. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE

City Manager Rod Butler announced that the City was recently awarded a Highway Safety Improvement grant for a new traffic signal at 24 th Street and Rubidoux Boulevard. He announced that due to the rain, the ribbon cutting event for the new Reach Out Community Resource Center will be rescheduled to Thursday, March 23 from 4 to 7 p.m.

12. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. MARCH 2, 2023 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Minutes of the March 2, 2023 regular meeting.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

13. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF

THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS

B. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND MCE

CORPORATION FOR CITYWIDE STORMWATER CATCH BASIN

CLEANING

-6-

1. Requested Action: That the City Council reject all quotes received on January 4, 2023.

2. That the City Council approve the Agreement by and between the City of Jurupa Valley and MCE Corporation (“MCE”) for an amount not to exceed $49,225.00; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

C. FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND TK E ENGINEERING, INC. FOR ON -CALL

LAND SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the F irst Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and TKE Engineering, Inc. for On - Call Land Surveying and Engineering Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the sta ff report as approved by the City Attorney.

D. APPROVAL OF THE FIRS T AMENDMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND ST C TRAFFIC, INC. FOR ON-CALL TRAFFIC

ENGINEERING SERVICES

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc. for On -Call Traffic Engineering Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

E. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND
STORM WATER INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC. FOR

THE INSTALLATION OF CERTIFIED FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM

TRASH TREATMENT CONTROL DEVICES

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services, Inc. (“SWIMS”), for an amount not to exceed $66,750.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

F. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ON -CALL ASSESSMENT

ENGINEER SERVICES

-7-

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Harris & Associates, Inc. for On -Call Assessment Engineer services for an amount not to exceed $200,000.00 per each fiscal year through the initial term of the Agreement, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substant ially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

G. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND KOA

CORPORATION FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
FOR SUNNYSLOPE AREA SR2S SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURE, FEDERAL
PROJECT NO 5487(003) CIP NO. 19107

Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and KOA Corporation for Construction Management Services, in the amount of $196,384.00, for Sunnyslope Area SR2S Sidewalk Gap Clos ure, Federal Project No. 5487(003) CIP No. 19107, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.

H. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY A ND STC TRAFFIC, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR CITYWIDE TRAFFIC

SIGNAL COORDINATION AND SIGNAL HEAD SAFETY UPGRADES
CIP NO. 21112

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC traffic, Inc., in the amount of $411,691.80, for design services for Citywide Traffic Signal Coordination and Signal Head Safety Upgrades CIP No. 21112 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney; and

2. Appropriate $125,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) to the Project account to fund the total project costs.

I. ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF

ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE OF A PUBLIC WATER IRRIGATION

LINE OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE WHEELER UPFITTERS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT (REX 5600CA LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY), SOUTH OF MARKET STREET, WEST OF
HALL AVENUE, AND NORTH OF 24TH STREET

1. Requested Action: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of an easement for the purpose of accessing a public irrigation line (Access Easement) and an easement for the purpose of maintaining and operating a public irrigation line (Water Irrigation Line Easement), as described on Grant of Easement (DED22-001) attached to the staff report; and

-8-

2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED22-001.

J. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE 2022 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL

PROGRESS REPORT
Requested Action: That the City Council review the 2022 General Plan Annual Progress Report and provide direction to submit the report to the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD).

K. APPROV AL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 37890 LOCATED EAST OF PYRITE

STREET, NORTH OF MISSION BOULEV ARD INCLUDING

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROV AL OF

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT
BONDS – REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR

FURTHER DISCUSSION

1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Parcel Map 37890 and accept the dedications as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes over all of Lot “A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I” as shown on Parcel Map 37890.
b. Accept the easement for public utility purposes as described in easement note 3 on Parcel Map 37890.

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Parcel Map 37890.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Council Member Leslie Altamirano, to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item 13.K, which was removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

-9-

14. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT

CALENDAR

13.K APPROV AL OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 37890 LOCATED EAST OF PYRITE

STREET, NORTH OF MISSION BOULEV ARD INCLUDING

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROV AL OF

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT
BONDS
Council Member Brian Berkson requested that Item 13.K be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. He questioned why there is a triangular corner on the parcel that is not a part of the approved parcel map and how it will fit in the original site plan.

Paul Toor, Director of Publi c Works, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.

Following discussion, City Manager Rod Butler gave a commitment to make sure that the parcel in question is addressed properly in order to keep the overall timeline intact.

A motion was made by Council Member Brian Berkson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, to approve Parcel Map 37890, with the condition that no agreements or conditions of approval will be approved until the 12 foot triangle on the parcel map is properly addressed and accept the dedications as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes over all of Lot “A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I” as shown on Parcel Map 37890.
b. Accept the easement for public utility purposes as described in easement note 3 on Parcel Map 37890.

2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Parcel Map 37890.

3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and

4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related off -site improvements and survey monumentation.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

-10-

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS

16. COUNCIL BUSINESS

A. APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISO RY

COMMITTEE (CDAC)

Staff Report presented by City Clerk Victoria Wasko . Ms. Wasko indicated that the terms of office for both vacancies will coincide with the Council Member’s terms of office. She received three letters of interest and both Rachel Lopez and Andrew Mac Millan expressed interest in being re-appointed. All of the applicants were invited to attend tonight’s meeting.

Mayor Chris Barajas invited the following applicants to address the City Council:

Pamela Blynn, Griselda Flores, and Joanna Medina.

Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva thanked everyone who applied for the vacancies and for their desire to serve the City.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Chris Barajas, to re -appoint Rachel Lopez to the Community Develop ment Advisory Committee for a term which shall expire in December 2024.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

Council Member Armando Carmona thanked all those that applied, stating that he looks forward to collaborating with them in different capacities.

A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona, seconded by Mayor Chris Barajas, to appoint Joanna Medina to the Community Development Advisory Committee for a term which shall expire in December 2026.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

B. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF THE 2023 -2028 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED PLAN, 2023/24

ANNUAL ACTION PLAN, CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN AND THE

PUBLIC SERVICE GRANTS

-11-

Staff Report presented by Amy Sells, Principal Management Analyst. Ms. Sells provided an overview of the CDBG Program and how the funds are allocated. She reported as a CDBG recipient, the City is required to submit a Consolidated Plan every five years. She noted that during the previous five fiscal years, the City has received approximately $1.2 million per year in CDBG funds. Ms. Sells provided examples of the programs and services that are eligible for CDBG funding. She advised that the Council is being asked to approve the Consolidated P lan, 2023- 2024 Annual Action Plan, Citizen Participation Plan and Public Service Grants.

She provided information on the public outreach efforts, the organizations that applied for the public services grants, and the deadlines in order to meet the federal timelines.

Council Member Brian Berkson asked for additional information regarding the programs and services that are provided by Clásico de las Américas. He voiced a concern that he does not know enough about their services and what they plan to do with the funds.

Council Member Leslie Altamirano indicated that she was not comfortable taking funds away from Path of Life as their homeless services are needed to help the City.

Further discussion followed.

Council Member Armando Carmona stated that one of the results of the survey was additional youth centers and he thinks it is important to include youth programming.

He asked that Clásico de las Américas be considered for funding because it is an opportunity to invest in the community’s youth.

Mayor Chris Barajas stated the CDBG funds are the only funding source for the City’s homeless services. He is hesitant to reduce any funds for Path of Life or for the senior meals program. He suggested that $150,000 be allocated to Path of Life and the remainder allocated to Family Services Association.

Further discussion followed.

Mayor Pro Tem Guillermo Silva asked if the Council could request additional information from Clásico de las Américas.

Discussion followed regarding the timeline for submittal of the grants and the 30- day comment period.

Joanna Medina commented that Path of Life offers beds that are not effectively used as families with children are afraid to use those resources due to residents who have substance abuse issues. She encouraged the Council to look into Path of Life and its overall effectiveness.

-12-

Robert Ramirez encouraged the Council to take care of the youth and invest in programs that make them part of the community. He suggested that the Council determine how much of Path of Life’s services are being utilized.

Council Member Brian Berkson suggested that Clásico de las Américas be asked to present to Council so there is greater understanding of their services and how they will utilize the funding.

Further discussion followed.

A motion was made by Council Member Brian B erkson, seconded by Mayor Chris Barajas to receive and file the draft 2023-2028 Consolidated Plan, 2023- 2024 Annual Action Plan, Citizen Participation Plan and Public Service Grants, provide input as to what programs/projects merit CDBG funds over the next five years, request that Clásico de las Américas return to the next Council meeting and present how they will utilize the $13,759 in funding, and tentatively distribute the available CDBG funds in the amount of $163,759 as follows:

Path of Life Ministries: $130,000
Family Services Association $ 20,000
Clasico de las Americas $ 13,759

Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva
Noes: L. Altamirano

Absent: None

C. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION TO STAFF

REGARDING TRANSLATION SERVI CES DURING CITY COUNCIL

AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS

Staff Report presented by Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager. Mr. Flad reported that staff researched the cost of providing translation services for City Council and Planning Commission meetings. Based upon historical costs and estimates, those costs are expected to be approximately $1,000 per meeting. For budgeting and discussion purposes, staff is recommending an average meeting time estimation of

3.5 hours, which results in a total cost estimation of $1,000 per meeting. City staff also researched the costs of sign language at a cost of $1,000 per meeting, which can be added if preferred.

Discussion followed regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act and any special accommodation requests that could be made in advance of a public meeting.

Nicole Sims stated that she is hard of hearing. She asked that the City Council be mindful of speaking into their microphones. She stated that closed captioning

-13-

would be helpful if added to the City’s recorded meeting videos for those who are deaf or hard of hearing.

Following discussion, the City Council, by consensus, directed City staff to provide translation and/or ADA accommodations upon request and bring back a comprehensive budget program that includes the costs for closed captioning and translation services.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None
D. REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT (RHNA) COMPLIANCE
UPDATE
Staff Report presented by Mary Wright, Project Manager. Ms. Wright reported that when the City Council adopted the Housing Element in 2021 it included a program to redesignate and rezone 19 sites to make up the shortfall that was anticipated for the state mandated Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). She clarified that state law does not require the City to build housing, but rather demonstrate it has adequate land for residential development. Ms. Wright noted that when the Paradise Knolls project was approved in January 2023, it reduced housing density that was assumed in the 2021 Ho using Element. Due to this decrease in density, the City is now in deficit of its low-income housing RHNA obligation. As a result the City must redesignate and rezone 6.6 acres of land to be redesignated to Highest Density Residential (HHDR) to make up fo r the shortfall which , including the required buffer would be 8.8 acres. She reported that the City must identify and rezone land within six months of a project that makes the City go into deficit. She outlined the potential ramifications if the City does not meet its RHNA. She outlined various sites that could be considered to make up for the shortfall, including potential religious and commercial sites.

Irene Rodriguez voiced a concern that the proposal is for a lot of housing for such a small area. She questioned why the developer was allowed to change the project as it will affect the members of the community.

Roberto Ramirez stated that sites 2 through 10 are located throughout the equestrian lifestyle, however, Site 1 is feasible as it located ou tside of this area. He voiced concern that by adding high density housing, it will be a “cancer” in the community that will ultimately eat away at the equestrian lifestyle. He expressed his view that the proposed high density sites are not spread fairly across all the Council Districts.

Jose De Leon voiced his preference for site 1A located on Country Village Road as it is close to freeway access to reduce traffic and it will not alter or impact the environment. He encouraged the Council to leave the current equestrian and horse properties alone.

-14-

Philip Caballero stated that additional housing will negatively impact the equestrian community, noting that since he has lived in Jurupa Valley, he knows of at least seven horses that have been hit and kille d by cars. He cautioned that adding additional high density housing will bring additional traffic. He encouraged the Council to choose a site that is more suited for high density.

Nicole Sims stated that she and her family own Sims Tree Learning Center and they have been proud residents of Jurupa Valley for over 50 years. She encouraged the Council to consider personal and monetary values as new apartment residents may not appreciate the characteristics of an equestrian community.

Patricia Vega stated that her and her family love their current lifestyle. She asked the Council to consider other areas for high density housing.

Ty Burlsen voiced concern that adding high density housing to the equestrian areas is not compatible with the existing neighborhoods and will bring additional traffic to areas with no street lights.

Yolanda Montez stated that the potential sites to meet the RHNA numbers should make sense and should not be located in areas that will gentrify and displace the current animal keeping lif estyle. She stated that the residents feel ignored and disregarded as they have continuously opposed high density housing. Pobedy Montes donated her time to her.

Samuel Rodriguez stated that he has lived in Jurupa Valley since 1995. He is worried that high density housing is slowly eroding the equestrian and animal keeping lifestyle. He encouraged the Council to consider other areas for the potential high density sites, stating that due to past actions, he feels “betrayed.” Mitch Harig asked that apartments and the traffic that they bring be kept out of the equestrian areas as residents want to keep their rural way of life.

Samantha Rojas stated that she is a proud member of the equestrian community.

She takes pride in riding horses, taking care of her animals, and cleaning up her community. She stated that considering high density homes in the equestrian community shows the Council does not believe that their lifestyle matters.

Kevin Sims described how many wildlife have disappeared over the years. He encouraged the Council to consider how bringing high density housing to the equestrian areas will cause more habitat destruction.

Council Member Leslie Altamirano asked if the religious and commercial sites could be looked at.

Further discussion followed.

-15-

Joe Perez, Community Development Director, reported that the state allows six months from a deficit to redesignate and rezone a site, which takes the City to July, 2023. Within that period of time it will be challenging to do a thorough and appropriate analysis on religious and commercial sites. He would be happy to direct his staff to do this analysis in the future; however it is not a potential solution for this situation. If the direction of the Council is to look at additional sites, he is willing to bring those back at the next meeting.

Following discussion, the City Council, by consensus, directed staff to bring back bring Sites 4a, 5a, 6a, 7a and 8a and sites where the property owner(s) have expressed interest in having their properties up -zoned outside the overlay.

Ayes: L. Altamirano, C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, G. Silva Noes: None

Absent: None

17. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

18. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
Deputy City Attorney Brendan Kearns had no report.

19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Council Member Leslie Altamirano announced that Healthy Jurupa Valley will be having an event at the Opal Car Wash in Rubidoux on Friday, March 17 from 4 – 8 pm. The event will allow residents to connect with their local businesses and organizations.

Council Member Armando Carmona thanked everyone for attending tonight’s meeting and speaking out on items of concern.

20. ADJOURNED IN MEMORY
Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned tonight’s meeting in honor of Norco City Councilmember Ted Hoffman. He conveyed condolences to his family on behalf of the City Council.

There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Chris Barajas adjourned the meeting at 11:27 p.m.

The next meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held April 6, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.

-16-

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.B

CHECK REGISTERS

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated February 23 and March 9,16, and 23, 2023 as well as the payroll registers dated February 28 and March 03 and 17, 2023 The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the annual budget process. The FY 2022-23 Budget was adopted on June 16, 2022. Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution throughout the fiscal year.

ANALYSIS
All expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the Government Code. The check register dated March 16, 2023 includes a $15,400.10 payment to Chase Card Services. The Statement, with purchase details, is attached herewith.

OTHER INFORMATION
None.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Check registers:
02/23/23 $ 1,102,477.78
03/09/23 $ 747,112.59
03/16/23 $ 235,907.36
03/23/23 $ 544.649.15

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD B. BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.C

APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR

THE TRANSFER OF SURPLUS LAND LOCATED IN THE CITY OF

JURUPA VALLEY

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2023-23, entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE COUNTY OF

RIVERSIDE FOR THE INTENTION TO CONVEY FEE SIMPLE INTEREST

IN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 156 -200-004, 163 -152-025, 165 -183- 013, 165 -190-034, 165-190-043, 165-190-045, 170-270-024, 174 -320-021, 174-320-022, 182-210-007, & 183-122-004 BY QUITCLAIM DEED TO THE

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY

BACKGROUND
Since the City of Jurupa Valley’s incorporation, the County of Riverside has afforded the City the opportunity to accept county owned land and buildings located in the City of Jurupa Valley. Recently, the County of Riverside requested the City consider the transfer of various small road remnant parcels that are vacant and situated along the City’s road system. For the County, the property is unusable remnant road parcels that are better served for City right-of-way safety and improvement purposes and to enhance the road system.

The property in the City of Jurupa Valley consists of approximately eleven parcels (4.03 acres) of unimproved land. On March 7, 2023, the County Board of Supervisors approved an Agreement that will convey fee simple interest in the Property by Quitclaim Deed, to the City.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS
The County of Riverside owns eleven parcels that total 4.03 acres of remnant property in the City of Jurupa Valley. City Staff has examined the properties and determined that accepting these property transfers could possibly be of benefit for future right-of-way safety and potential community purposes. The Assessor Parcel Numbers and full description and parcel maps may be found as an attachment to the Transfer Agreement.

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54221 (f)(1)(D) and the Surplus Land Act Guidelines Section 103(b)(3)(D), surplus land that a local agency is transferring to another local, state, or federal agency for the agency’s use is exempt from the requirements of the Surplus Land Act. The State of California Department of Housing and Community Development has preliminarily determined that the County has met all of the requirements under the Surplus Land Act for the purpose of declaring the Properties exempt surplus.

Accordingly, the Property was declared as exempt surplus land, as the Property is being conveyed from another local agency for the transferee agency’s use is no longer needed to be owned by the County. Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D).

Staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. 2023-23 to declare the Property exempt surplus land and accept the County’s notice of intent to convey the Property to the City.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact for the transfer of land . Maintenance, security infrastructure and insurance costs will be included in the 2023-2024 Annual Budget.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not approve the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and the County of Riverside for Surplus Land.

2. Provide alternate direction to Staff.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-23

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND THE COUNTY OF

RIVERSIDE FOR THE INTENTION TO CONVEY FEE SIMPLE

TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside is the owner of certain real property in the City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 156-200-004, 163 -152-025, 165 -183-013, 165 -190-034, 165 -190-043, 165 -190-045, 170 -270- 024, 174-320-021, 174-320-022, 182-210-007, & 183-122-004 (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of approximately 4.03 acres of unimproved land and is found throughout the City of Jurupa Valley; and
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside deems the Property an uneconomical remnant, which is longer required for County uses or purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Property is exempt surplus land under the Surplus Land Act (SLA) pursuant to California Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D) because the Property is being transferred to another local agency for the transferee agency’s use; and WHEREAS, the County of Riverside desires to transfer the Property to the City of Jurupa Valley; and
WHEREAS, the City of Jurupa Valley and the County of Riverside concur that it would be in both parties best interest to transfer ownership of the Property to the City of Jurupa Valley; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 25365, the Board of Supervisors may, by a vote of not less than four-fifths, transfer or sell real property or any interest therein, belonging to the County to another public agency, upon the terms a nd conditions as are agreed upon and without complying with any other provisions of Government Code if the property or interest therein to be conveyed is not required for County use.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley as follows:

1. Approval of Transfer Agreement. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, a general law city established under the laws of the State of California, he reby approves that certain agreement entitled “Transfer Agreement” between the City of Jurupa Valley and the County of Riverside in substantially the form on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the -2-

Agreement on behalf of the City. An original of the Transfer Agreement, when executed by the City and the District, shall be placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

2. City Manager’s Authority. The City Manager is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to take all actions necessary and convenient to carry -out and implement the terms of the Transfer Agreement, effect the transfer the Property to the City and approve and execute on behalf of the City all agreements, documents or instruments that are necessary and convenient to implement the Transfer Agreement and effect the transfer of the Property to the City, including but not limited to, property studies, escrow instructions, title reports, resolutions of title exceptions, certificate of acceptance for the Grant Deed, and other similar agreements documents or instruments.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 6th day of April, 2023.

______________________________
Chris Barajas
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-3-

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023 -23, was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 6th day of April, 2023 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 6th day of April, 2023.

Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.D

CITY COUNCIL INITIATION OF A MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT TO TITLE 5 AND TITLE 9 MODIFYING REGULATIONS FOR MASSAGE
ESTABLISHMENTS; CEQA DETERMINATION: THE INITIATION OF A

CODE AMENDMENT IS NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA

RECOMMENDATION
By motion, initiate proceedings to consider a Municipal Code Amendment to Title 5 and Title 9 modifying regulations for massage establishments.

BACKGROUND
As a part of the City Business Registration application process, the City has experienced issues with massage establishments including businesses not properly obtaining appropriate permits and not obtaining or annually updating their business registrations.

Staff from City Business Registration, Community Development Department , Code Enforcement, and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department have been collaborating to develop ways of improving the review procedures , coordination between agencies, and oversight of massage establishments within the City.

ANALYSIS
The purpose of the proposed Municipal Code amendments related to massage establishments is to deter prostitution or other illicit activity, clarify existing provisions , update review process , and incorporate stricter standards and penalties . Examples of potential amendments to the Code include:
 Requirement of a Conditional Use Permit for new massage establishments.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

 Requirement for massage therapists to be certified by California Massage Therapy Council.
 Establishment of a revocation proces s for a massage establishment that (a) violates the Municipal Code or conditions of approval, or has a massage business license revoked by the Chief of Police.
 Refinement of the City and Sheriff’s Department review process.  Provisions that are intended to prevent an illegal massage establishm ent to reopen.

Initiation process
A Municipal Code Amendment requires initiation by the City Council. The following considerations apply to the initiation process, which only authorizes the process to begin:

1. Initiation of a Municipal Code Amendment does not entail an evaluation of the merits of the proposed project, but only whether to proceed with a formal evaluation process and public hearings.

2. The Council may express its opinions as to whether the City should proceed with the formal evaluation process but should reserve its opinions regarding the merits or the ultimate action on the item until the evaluation process and public hearings have been completed.

3. The only issue before the Council currently is whether or not to initiate the Municipal Code Amendment to Title s 5 9 modifying regulations for massage establishments. Once the formal evaluation process and public hearings are completed, the City Council will have the opportunity to approve or disapprove or make changes to the Municipal Code.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
There is no requirement for public notice for an initiation of a Zoning Code Amendment.

Public notices for the public hearings of the proposed Zoning Code Amendment will be conducted on future dates.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Initiation of a code amendment is not subject to CEQA.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The expenses related to the proposed code amendment would be paid from the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Initiate proceedings to consider.

2. Decline to initiate the Municipal Code Amendment at this time.

3. Defer action and request additional information.

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: CONNIE CARDENAS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.E

APPROVAL OF SALES AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE TWO
MULTIFUNCTION SHARP MX 8081 HIGH SPEED COLOR

DOCUMENT SYSTEMS

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council approve award of RFP 2022 -23-08 to CBE Office Solutions for the purchase of two multifunction Sharp MX 8081 high speed color document systems not to exceed $29,605.61.

BACKGROUND
In 2018, the City leased three copiers with a 60-month term lease agreement. Within the last five years, t he City has added staffing to support the growth in Community Development, Building, Code, Engineering and Public Works. As part of the growth, the City has also purchased the Jurupa Valley Operations Center (JVOC).

Staff has an increased the need for high-speed color printing and scanning for blueprints, public works projects mechanical , architectural drawings, and building plans. To meet these needs, the City released an RFP for printers and copiers. A staff review committee interviewed the top three responding bidders. After completion of the interviews, a City team with representatives from multiple departments visited the top responder’s showroom to verify the capability and performance of the proposed machines. City staff toured the showroom wit h sample work d ocuments and tested the product to ensure quality, speed, and ease of use.

The City staff located at JVOC has also increased and has an increased need for color printing; large scale 11 x 17 scanning, and copying of Public Works documents. Two of the current copiers at City Hall will be relocated to accommodate JVOC’s staff growth.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.A

REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT (RHNA) COMPLIANCE

UPDATE- POTENTIAL SITES FOR RE-ZONING
______________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council r eceive a staff presentation on potential sites to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and provide direction regarding how to proceed.

BACKGROUND
As discussed at the City Council meetings of February 16, 2023 and March 16, 2023, the 6th Cycle General Plan Housing Element for the 2021-2029 planning period was adopted on December 2, 2021 and certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on April 21, 2022 as being fully compliant with State law. As part of the Housing Element certification process, the City was required to identify anticipated densities from projects in process as well as vacant and underutilized sites to achieve the City’s RHNA of 4,497 units for the 2021 -2029 planning period. This process r esulted in the identification of 19 sites, totaling 70.84 acres, proposed to be redesignated to the Highest Density Residential Density (HHDR) and rezoned to R-3 to meet RHNA. These sites are expected to be considered at public hearings of the Planning Co mmission and City Council later this year. Figures 1 and 2, below illustrate existing HHDR-designated sites in the City and the 19 proposed 6th Cycle redesignation and rezone sites.

The Housing Element sites inventory included an assumption that Planning Area 2 of Paradise Knolls would develop with 300 dwelling units at 28.4 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) as specified in the Specific Plan. The units were then broken down into 195 very low-income units and 105 low -income units as provided by State law whic h allows jurisdictions to use higher density as a proxy for lower income if certain requirements are met. However, on January 19, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing and approved

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

two residential projects on Planning Area 2 at densities lower than those identified in the Housing Element. Due to this decrease in density, the City is now in deficit of its low - income housing RHNA obligation as shown in Table 1.

Figure 1: Sites Designated Highest Density Residential (HHDR)

Figure 2: 6th Cycle General Plan Redesignation & Rezone Sites

Page | 3

Table 1 – 6th Cycle RHNA with Paradise Knolls Reduction Income Levels
Total
(du)
Very Low
(du)
Low (du) Moderate
(du)
Above
Moderate
(du)

2021-2029 RHNA 1,207 749 731 1,810 4,497
Housing Element RHNA
Surplus with 19
Redesignation/Zone
Change Sites
+250 +65 +362 +1,174 +1,850
Paradise Knolls Planning
Area 2 Modification
-195 -105 +153
Revised RHNA
Surplus/Deficit
+55 -40 +362 +1,327

Based on the RHNA deficit of 40 dwelling units in the low-income category, the City needs to redesignate a minimum of 6.6 acres of additional property to HHDR to make up for the shortfall. The 6.6-acre number is the amount of land needed to theoretically produce 40 units of low-income housing based on a net density of 17.5 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and a 65% / 35% split between very low and low -income housing. However, HCD recommends that an additional 15-30% of the RHNA obligation be included to provide a buffer in the event that other development proposals fall short of expectations. This would result in a revised total of 7.6 to 8.6 acres of land needed to be redesignated to HHDR.

Per the State’s “No Net Loss” law (Government Code Section 65863), if the approval of a project at a lower density results in the remaining sites becoming inadequate to accommodate the RHNA by income category, the jurisdiction has up to 180 days from the date of the approval to redesignate/rezone additional sites to accommodate the remaining RHNA. Given the approval of the two Paradise Knolls projects on January 19, 2023, the City must take action to redesignate additional land to make up the shortfall by July 18, 2023. The City must report its actions in the Annual Progress Report (APR) due to HCD on April 1 st of each year but does not need to revise the Housing Element or otherwise report its actions to HCD. In addition, although HCD does not proactively monitor the status of the City’s RHNA, if a report of a deficit is made to the State, HCD will investigate and has t he ability to decertify the Housing Element if they believe that proactive measures to remedy the situation are not being taken.

City Council Study Session
At the March 16, 2023 City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed 13 additional sites for potent ial redesignation to HHDR to make up the RHNA shortfall. In addition, the Council heard public testimony on the sites . Following City Council discussion, t he City Council provided direction to bring back Sites 4a, 5a, 6a, 7a and 8a, and a new site (Site 12a) located at 6464 33 rd Street based on a letter submitted on behalf of the property owner (Attachment 3). The six sites and the ELO are illustrated on Figure 3 below.

Page | 4

Figure 3: Sites for Potential RHNA Redesignation/Rezones and ELO

The City Council also directed that sites be brought back for consideration where a property owner expressed interest in HHDR land use designation and where the property is located outside the ELO. The only site that met that criteria is Site 12a, which is discussed below.

ANALYSIS
The following paragraphs include a summary of Sites 4a, 5a, 6a, 7a , 8a and 12a for Council consideration and discussion.

Site 4a
Site 4a includes three parcels of land totaling 10.33 acres located immediately west of Van Buren Boulevard and east of Hudson Street between 59 th Street and 56 th Street. The site is vacant and contains a number of off-road vehicle trails. Surrounding uses include Van Buren Boulevard, vacant land, mixed residential and a plant nursery to the east, single-family residences and vacant land to the south, Pedley Elementary School, single-family residences and a plant nursery to the west, and 56 th Street, a plant nursery and vacant land to the north (Figure 4).

Page | 5

Figure 4 – Site 4a

Table 2 below outlines the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for Site 4a as well as the potential dwelling unit yield if the site is redesignated to HHDR.

The site is located entirely within the ELO.

Table 2 – Site 4a

APN

Acres
Existing Potential Potential Units
ELO
(In/Out)
GP Zone GP Zone Very
Low
Low Total
165-080-002 4.35 LDR R-1 HHDR R-3 49 27 76 In
165-140-027 2.72 LDR R-1 HHDR R-3 31 17 48 In
165-140-028 3.26 LDR R-1 HHDR R-3 37 20 57 In
Total Site 4a: 10.33 117 64 181

Site 5a
Site 5a includes six parcels of land consisting of 21.21 acres located immediately east of Van Buren Boulevard and west of Pedley Road at 58 th Street. The site is primarily vacant but contains a few single -family residences and outbuildings.

Surrounding land uses include vacant land and single-family residences to the east, the Jurupa Valley/Pedley transit station to the south, Van Buren Boulevard, sin gle- family residences and vacant land to the west, and a plant nursery to the north (Figure 5).

Page | 6

Figure 5 – Site 5a

Site 5a is partially within and partially outside the ELO as shown on Figure 6.

Figure 6 – Sites 4a & 5a – ELO

Page | 7

Table 3 below outlines the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for Site 5a, the potential dwelling unit yield if the site is redesignated to HHDR and whether the parcels are within or outside the ELO.

Table 3 – Site 5a

APN

Acres
Existing Potential Potential Units
ELO
(In/Out)
GP Zone GP Zone Very
Low
Low Total
165-080-005 7.0 LDR R-A HHDR R-3 79 43 122 In
165-140-004 0.48 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 5 3 8 Out
165-140-029 4.5 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 51 28 79 Out
165-140-030 2.16 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 25 13 38 Out
165-140-007 1.18 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 14 7 21 Out
165-140-008 5.89 CR C-1/
C-P
HHDR R-3 67 36 103 Out
Total Site 5a: 21.21 241 130 371

Site 6a
Site 6a includes six parcels of land consisting of 13.81 acres located immediately north of Limonite Avenue at Baker Street. The vacant site is surrounded by mixed residential and commercial development to the east, Limonite Avenue and mixed residential development to the south, Felspar Street, a gas station/mini mar t and single-family residences to the west, and a portion of 61 st Street, vacant land and single-family residences to the north (Figure 7).

Page | 8

Figure 7 – Site 6a

Table 4 below outlines the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for Site 6a as well as the potential dwelling unit yield if the site is redesignated to HHDR.

The site is located entirely within the ELO.

Table 4 – Site 6a

APN

Acres
Existing Potential Potential Units
ELO
(In/Out)
GP Zone GP Zone Very
Low
Low Total
165-120-017 4.03 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 46 24 70 In
165-120-016 0.22 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 3 1 4 In
165-120-006 2.45 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 28 15 43 In
165-120-007 2.45 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 28 15 43 In
165-130-019 2.33 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 27 14 41 In
165-130-021 2.33 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 27 14 41 In
Total Site 6a: 13.81 159 83 242

Page | 9

Site 7a
Site 7a includes one parcel consisting of 5.61 acres located immediately north of Limonite Avenue between Downey Street and Corey Street . T o the east of the vacant site is a retail/restaurant development under construction. Other surrounding land uses include Limonite Avenue and mixed residential, vacant l and and a fire station to the south, Downey Street and single -family residences to the west, and single-family residences to the north (Figure 8).

Figure 8 – Site 7a

Table 5 below outlines the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for Site 7a as well as the potential dwelling unit yield if the site is redesignated to HHDR. The site is located entirely within the ELO.

Table 5 – Site 7a

APN

Acres
Existing Potential Potential Units
ELO
(In/Out)
GP Zone GP Zone Very
Low
Low Total
165-240-018 5.61 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 64 34 98 In

Site 8a
Site 8a includes five parcels consisting of 24.02 acres located immediately north of Limonite Avenue on either side of Beach Street. The vacant site is surrounded by single-family residences to the east, Limonite Avenue , Paradise Knolls and the

Page | 10

California-Nevada Electrical Joint Apprenticeship Training Trust Fund (JATC) to the south, and mixed residentia l, commercial and vacant land to the west and north (Figure 9).

Figure 9 – Site 8a

Table 6 below outlines the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for Site 8a as well as the potential dwelling unit yield if the site is redesignated to HHDR. The site is located entirely within the ELO.

Table 6 – Site 8a

APN

Acres
Existing Potential Potential Units
ELO
(In/Out)
GP Zone GP Zone Very
Low
Low Total
162-200-009 4.95 LDR A-1-4 HHDR R-3 56 30 86 In
162-200-008 5.0 LDR A-1-4 HHDR R-3 57 30 87 In
162-210-004 5.0 LDR A-1-4 HHDR R-3 57 30 87 In
162-210-011 4.99 LDR A-1-4 HHDR R-3 57 30 87 In
162-210-012 4.08 LDR A-1-4 HHDR R-3 46 25 71 In
Total Site 8a: 24.02 273 145 418

Page | 11

Site 12a
Site 12a is a new site added to the list at the property owner’s request (Attachme nt 3). The site includes two parcels of land consisting of 24.05 acres located at 6464 33rd Street southeast of the intersection of Florine Avenue and 33 rd Street. The parcels are cu rrently vacant but have been used for automobile storage on pavement that covers the entire site. The site is bounded by a drainage channel, Canal Street, SR -60, the Shadow Rock residential community, scattered single - family dwellings and vacant lands to the east and south, Florine Avenue and single- family dwellings to the west and northwest, and 33 rd Street, a nursing facility and vacant land to the north (Figure 10).

Figure 10 – Site 12a

Table 7 below outlines the existing and potential General Plan and Zoning designations for Site 12a as well as the potential dwelling unit yield if the site is redesignated to HHDR. The site is located entirely outside of the ELO.

The property owner recently subm itted a pre-application for a proposed residential development on the site. The proposed project includes two parcels (21.6 acres and

2.2 acres) for a total site area of 23.8 acres. The project proposes a zone change from M-SC Manufacturing Service -Commercial to R -3 General Residential and a new General Plan land use designation of Highest Density Residential. This new

Page | 13

Reviewed by: Reviewed by:

___________________________

__________________________
Connie Cardenas Michael Flad
Administrative Services Director Assistant City Manager

Reviewed by:

Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney

Attachments:

1. City of Jurupa Valley 6th Cycle Housing
Elementhttps://www.jurupavalley.org/DocumentCenter/View/2268/Preliminary- Revised-Jurupa-Valley-HEU-4-20-22-rev-CLEAN

2. 2021-2029 Housing Element Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites

3. Letter From Kevin Kohan Regarding 6464 33rd Street dated March 16, 2023

ATTACHMENT NO. 2
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT POTENTIAL

REDESIGNATION / REZONE SITES
Total Rezone: 19 Sites
T
otal Acres: 70.84 Acres
Potential Units: 1,197
Riverside
Ontario
Corona
Santa Ana
Anaheim
City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
¯
0 52.5
Miles
1 Pats Ranch Rd
Sk
im
mer Dr
Parkcenter Dr
I-15 Corridor
Specific Plan
Rezone Area: A
T
otal Acres: 6.00
Potential Units: 150
A-01* 6 BP SP ZONE HHDR I-15 Corridor 25 25 25 150 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area A
¯
0 500250
Feet
* Because the site is located in a Specific Plan which includes roads and infrastructure seperately, the mazimum density is assumed.
1 2
Eve Cir
N
Lynn
Cir
Country Village
Golf Course
C St
Eve Cir
N Ly
nn C
ir
Emma
St
Nettie S
t
A St
Ev
e
Cir
Country Club Dr
Cou
ntry V
illage
Rd
Eve C
ir
Gran
ite Hill Dr
Country Vi
llage Rd
Rezone Area: B
T
otal Acres: 5.80
Potential Units: 101
B-01 156230004 2.3 PF R -A-20 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 40 Vacant B-02 156220002 3.5 PF R-A-20 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 61 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area B
¯
0 500250
Feet

1 2
4 5
Gra nite Hil l D r
60 Be n Nevis Blvd
Pomona Fwy
45 60
Gra
nite Hill Dr
Pomo na Fwy
Rezone Area: C
Total Acres: 7.29
Potential Units: 127
C-01 173160002 0.8 LDR W-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 14 Vacant C-02 173160003 0.3 LDR W-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 5 Vacant C-04* 173160029 2.76 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 48 Vacant C-05* 173160030 3.43 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 60 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area C
¯
0 500250
Feet
*The northern half of C-04 and C-05 would be redesignated to HHDR and rezoned to R-3. The southern half of C-04 and C-05 would remain CR/C-P-S. In addition, the mixed-use overlay designation would be applied to the entirety of C-04 and C-05 to indicate the sites should be developed as mixed-use projects with commercial development on the southern half of each property and residential development on the northern half. 1 2
3 4 5 6
Qua
rt
z Canyon
Rd
60 Granite Hill Dr
Richardo Ave
Pomona Fwy
Pomona Fwy
45 60
Rezone Area: D
T
otal Acres: 29.90
Potential Units: 445
D-01 173120005 6.4 LI W -2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 112 Vacant D-02 173120006 6.4 LI W-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 112 Vacant D-03* 173120007 13 LI W-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 150 Vacant D-04** 169040003 0.2 LI W-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 3 Vacant D-05 169040004 0.8 LI W-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 14 Vacant D-06 169040005 3.1 LI W-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 54 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area D
¯
0 500250
Feet
* Although site size could result in unit count of 228 under the HHDR a more realistic unit count of 150 has been assumed. ** Al
though < 0.5 acres, this analysis assumes site would be consolidated with D-01. 1 2
3 Maria B
onita Av
e
Mission Blvd
Lin
co
ln Av e
Franc
isc
o
JrAve
Jose Ave
Pe
dley Rd
Pe
dl
ey
Rd
Mission Blvd
Rezone Area: E
T
otal Acres: 7.04
Potential Units: 121
E-01 169070002 3.54 MHDR R-D HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 61 Vacant E-02 169070031 1 CR C-1/C-P HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 17 Vacant E-03 169172075 2.5 CR C-P-S HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 43 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area E
¯
0 500250
Feet
1 Mission Blvd
Mis sion Blvd
Sikh Te mple Way
Rezone Area: F
T
otal Acres: 4.70
Potential Units: 82
F-01 171020006 4.7 BP A -1 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 82 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area F
¯
0 500250
Feet
1 Pionee
r Dr
Av
alonSt
Avalon St36th St
Avalon S
t
34th St
Pione
er Dr
Pontiac Av
e
Rezone Area: G
T
otal Acres: 2.40
Potential Units: 42
G-01 179101002 2.4 MHDR R-2 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 42 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area G
¯
0 500250
Feet
1 Sax
on Ct
Pacif ic Ave
Pacif
ic A
ve
46 th
St
Ri
ver v
iew
Dr
Allwood
St
Horizon
Ln
Lim
onite Ave
Limon
ite Av
e
Limonite Ave
Allwood St
Bonh
ill St
Rezone Area: H
T
otal Acres: 7.40
Potential Units: 129
H-01 182350002 7.4 MDR R -3 HHDR R-3 20 25 17.5 129 Vacant Map ID APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zone Proposed GP Proposed Min. Density Max. Density Reduced Potential Status City of Jurupa Valley
2021 - 2029 Housing Element
Potential Redesignation/Rezone Sites
Area H
¯
0 500250
Feet

ATTACHMENT NO. 3

LETTER FROM KEVIN KOHAN REGARDING
6464 33rd STREET DATED MARCH 16, 2023

Elevated Entitlements
280 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite H
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
Date: March 16, 2023
Attention: City of Jurupa
City Council
8930 Limonte Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Reference: Item No. 16.D March 16, 2023 Agenda: 6464 33rd Street, Jurupa Valley (APN: 177-110-016, 177-110-018)
Dear Honorable City Council Members,

My name is Kevin Kohan and I am a Principal Planner with Elevated Entitlements. I am representing the property owner at 6464 33 rd Street in Jurupa Valley (APN#: 177- 110-016, 177-110-018). This letter is regarding Item Number 16.D, Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Compliance Update. This letter is requesting the Council to strongly consider the approximately 23.8-acre site at 6464 33 rd Street as a designated Highest Density Residential (HHDR) land use. Currently, the property owner has begun the pre- application process with the City of Jurupa for a proposed land use designation change from Medium Density Residential to Highest Density Resi dential. The pre-application design for the proposed project includes approximately 535 dwelling units. The subject site is situated between existing si ngle-family development along Florine Avenue and new single-family development on Winter Park Avenue. These surrounding family housing developments are sorely in need of community spaces such as parks, playgrounds, and recreational spaces. The proposed project site, which is currently a dead end for Florine Avenue, Winter Park Avenue, and 33d Street, has the potential to bring these neighborhoods together around new community open spaces.

The preliminary site plan we submitted for pre-application with the City of Jurupa proposes a new street grid linking the existing adjoining streets and a new re creation field and park area, which would be easily accessible to the surrounding community.

In addition to offering new connectivity and community spaces, the proposed project will contribute significantly to the City’s strained housing stock. Nearly 24 acres in area, the site would have an allowable density of 595 dwelling units under HHDR land use desi gnation. The pre-application proposal submitted to the City includes two and three story townhomes and apartments with a total of 535 units. We understand that the City’s proposed amendment to the 6th Cycle Housing Element is based on the State of California’s pressures to identify anticipated densities from projects in process as well as vacant sites to achieve the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goals of 4,497 units for the 2021-2029 planning period.

We are also aware that the City has been working to identify a number of sites for potential HHDR land use designations. On behalf of the property owner, we would like to present this property as an excellent candidate in this respect. The subject site is well situated in relation to other residential developments, is large enough to offer over 500 dwellings, is outside the equestrian overlay, and is currently in the pre-application process.

We thank you for your time and consideration and are available to answer questions or comments as requested.

Best,
Kevin Kohan
Principal Planner
Phone: 805-232-4383
[email protected]
Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD B. BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.B
CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF THE 2023-2024 PUBLIC SERVICE GRANTS

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council receive a presentation from Clasico de las Americas and provide input regarding the 2023-2024 Public Service Grants

BACKGROUND
Public Service Grants
The Public Service Grants are a component of the Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Annual Action Plan and each year the City advertises for applicants. T he City’s CDBG team, which consists of both City Staff and a consultant from GRC Associates, Inc. (GRC), published the Public S ervice Grant application on January 3, 2023 . The purpose of the grant application was to solicit grant proposals from qualified non -profit agencies that serve residents in the community that meet the demographic criteria established by HUD (low -moderate i ncome, homeless, etc.). The City received three applications by the January 31, 2023 deadline. Upon receipt, the City’s CDBG team reviewed each application based on the objective rating process approved by the CDAC during the 2019-20 program year.

In order to meet HUD timelines, cities must begin the CDBG grant process based on an estimated total allocation. On February 27, 2023, the City received notice of the final 2023-2024 CDBG allocation of $1,091,728, with the maximum amount available for Public Service Grants being 15% of this total allocation, or $163,759, which is less than what we estimated. The City received $220,000 in public service grant requests from Jurupa Valley serving non-profits. At the CDAC meetings on February 9, 2023 and February 23 , 2023.

The CDAC made recommendations based on an estimate of $170,000.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

A summary of each application is provided below.

Applicant: Family Services Association

Funding Request: $20,000

Current Level of CDBG Funding (not including CDBG-CV): 16,944.00

Service: Senior Nutrition Program

Summary: The FSA currently provides a senior meal program at the Eddie D. Smith Senior Center on Mission Boulevard. FSA recently reinstated the in-person service at the senior center and their team prepares an d cooks meals and provides nutrition -related resources and education. FSA’s application describes how receiving CDBG funds will allow them to provide meals to the seniors of the community.

Applicant: Path of Life Ministries, Inc.

Funding Request: $165,000.00

Current Level of CDBG Funding (not including CDBG-CV): $150,000.00

Service: Emergency Shelter, Outreach, and Prevention

Summary: Path of Life has been providing homelessness outreach and shelter to homeless Jurupa Valley residents since July 1, 2017. The proposed program will continue to address the urgent need of homelessness and lack of shelter beds in Jurupa Valley.

Path of Life’s program provides street outreach with supportive services, 4 reserved shelter beds for Jurupa Valley residents, and homelessness prevention.

Applicant: Clásico de las Américas (CDLA)

Funding Request: $100,000.00

Current Level of CDBG Funding (not including CDBG-CV): n/a

Service: CDLA Equestrian Training Center

Summary: The CDLA will provide Youth and Adult Eques trian Sports Programs and a facility to train, learn and leisure ride. The program will offer classes on horsemanship and provide access to the facility to train for equestrian sports. Designed for Jurupa Valley residents who want to learn more about horse management and equine husbandry.

On February 9, 2023, the CDAC met to hear presentations from each of the PSG applicants. The Committee was given ranking and budget sheets to allocate funding to the non-profit organizations. At the February 23, 2023 CDAC meeting, the Committee

Page | 3

Members finalized their funding recommendation to the City Council. The final recommendation is displayed in the chart below.

ANALYSIS

At the March 16, 2023 City Council Meeting the City Council had the opportunity to modify any of the CDAC recommendations – up to a maximum $163,759 in public service grants.

After a lengthy discussion by the City Council, they made a tentative approval of the $163,759 distribution as follows:

Path of Life Ministries: $130,000
Family Services Association $ 20,000
Clasico de las Americas $ 13,759

The City Council asked that Clasico de las Americas return to this meeting to present to the City Council their plan for the new funding amount and how it will benefit the low and moderate income residents of the city. In addition, a question was raised about the safety of the riders and the applicant was made aware of this and will address safety of the participants as part of their presentation.

A final recommendation from City Council will be included as part of the Community Development Block Grant 2023 -2024 Annual Action Plan for final approval on April 20, 2023. The funding cycle for these funds will begin on July 1, 2023.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

This briefing carries no financial impact.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternate direction to staff.

Non-Profit/Program
Name
CDAC-
Lopez
CDAC-
Oaks
CDAC-
MacMillan
CDAC -
Miller
CDAC-
McEachern
Final
Recommendation to
City Council
City
Council
Decision
Clasico de las
Americas $20,000 $15,000 $20,000 $125,000 $50,000 $20,000

Family Services
Association 20,000 20,000 $20,000 40,000 20,000 20,000

Path of Life 130,000 135,000 130,000 105,000 100,000 130,000

TOTAL $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $270,000 $170,000 $170,000 $163,759 Funding Allocated to Non-Profits by Commissioner

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: APRIL 6, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.C

DISCUSSION OF A MEMBERSHIP TO THE LEAGU E OF CALFORNIA

CITIES AND EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council discuss the cost and benefits for a membership in the League of California Cities and/or cost benefit of budgeting for non-member training for educational and training opportunities through the League of California Cities.

BACKGROUND
As part of a comprehensive, rete ntion and succession plan, the executive staff has realized that t he development of employees is crucial in securing the organization’s leaders of the future. As part of this preparation, education specif ically targeted at the local government level is recommended.

The League of California Cities ( Cal Cities) offers unmatched learning opportunities for city staff and leaders. Its conferences and events provide staff and local officials with a chance to hear from experts and explore new solutions to everyday challenges that cities face. Cal Cities offers year -round education and networking opportunities for new and seasoned city staff and leaders. Comprehensive, specialized programs allow participants to learn about new developments in their field while exchanging ideas on solutions to common challenges. They provide information, training and resources necessary to effectively run a municipality.

In addition to staff training, the education through Cal Cities provides Council Member and Commissioners the ability to engage in meaningful policy development discussions, pertinent educational workshops and relevant networking opportunities. Cal Cities is the largest association of cities in California comprising 478 cities in the state. Along with the education component, their mission is to expand and protect loca l control through advocacy to enhance the quality of life for all Californians.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

ANALYSIS

Annual membership dues are determined using a city’s population as set forth by the California Department of Finance. For cities with a population of 100,001 to 125,000 the 2023 membership dues are $30,057.

Below is a list of Membership Benefit s for city staff and elected city officials through the annual membership.

Page | 3

If City Council does not elect to participate through Cal Cities annual membership, there are opportunities to attend the many conferences through the non -member rates. Below is a chart that comprises these dollar amounts per person.

An average participation for each conference would typically be 2-7 people with a combination of staff and city officials.

Non-Member Rates Member Rates
Public Works Conference (2) = $3,000 = $1,250
Planning Commissioners Academy (7) = $11,725 = $4,725 City Clerks (2) = $3,000 = $1,000
Annual Conference (7) = $11,200 = $4,200
Municipal Finance Institute (3) = $4,350 = $1,350
City Managers Conference (2) = $3,500 = $1,500
New Mayors and Council (2) = $3,250 = $1,250
Total = $40,025 = $15,275

Difference of $24,750 from Non-Member Rates versus Member Rates

Membership Cost $30,057
Plus Membership Training Rates $15,275
Total $45,332

Total Costs with Membership $45,332
Less Non-Member Training Rates $40,025
Total Difference in Cost $ 5,307

FINANCIAL IMPACT

The funding for this action will be brought back to the City Council as part of the FY 2023- 2024 annual budget.

Page | 4

ALTERNATIVES

1. Note and file this request and elect to not become a member or budget for future training through Cal Cities.

2. Continue the matter to receive additional information from Staff and to provide additional time for Council discussion and consideration.

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************

Jurupa Valley City CouncilApril 6, 2023

Jurupa Valley City Council
April 6, 2023